Well, hello everybody. Thank you for being here. I apologize for us being slightly late. My name is Jamie Ho from the Straits Times in Singapore. I have the privilege of moderating this very distinguished panel. Let me just get straight into it, as I said, because we are slightly late. Let me introduce my panel. I have Prime Minister Han Duk-soo from the Republic of Korea, Kais Ollengren, the Minister of Defense from the Netherlands, Foreign Minister Javier Gonzales Ollichea from Peru, and Mike Froman, the President of the Council on Foreign Relations, who obviously brings to us in public service in the U.I. red states. What I'll do is let me frame the discussion that we'll have today. First, obviously, we've seen the title of this session. We'll talk about how the Pacific can and must continue to be the vanguard for growth, especially inclusive and sustainable growth for itself and for the world. Second, we'll also then talk about the unique sort of security aspects to which the world, and that's where the Netherlands probably, by the perspective, looks to the Pacific as well. I'll ask these questions in the first instance to the panelists. They will have opportunities to respond. Let me just say that I will, after their first remarks and their first answers, open the floor to questions from all of you. It's my intention to have as much of that as possible. And then after that, we'll see whether there are follow-up questions, and we'll keep this open and free-flowing as possible. Let me start the conversation first with Peru. Peru will have the very unique responsibility this year leading APEC, and I was very keen and very interested to see that they had a little theme and tagline to outline what they plan to do, empower, include, and grow. So I'm going to ask the minister to outline for us why he chose those themes to guide his presidency of APEC, and the floor I now turn to you, minister. Thank you very much, Mr. Ho. It is a real pleasure and an honor to share this panel with distinguished speakers and with the audience. For Peru, it is a real challenge that we are taking on for the third time in the presence of APEC, and we've been favored with chairing it in 2024. This is the space of greatest growth in the world, and we believe that this is the best possibility, the best opportunity among economies that make it up. I'm speaking about 21 countries in order to cooperate in the increase of investments and trade, because as we understand things, there's no possibility, there's no chance for development without a flow of investment, without understanding and valuing private companies at full and without respecting conditions offered by each country. And in my case, conditions that are absolutely stable in Peru, and in equal macroeconomic conditions for national and foreign investors. But this opportunity that is being given to us is something we don't want to project to Peru. We believe that all economies should benefit from this encounter that has three goals, three main goals. That is the possibility for the host countries that has been fixed in the agenda, mainly to approach trade and investment for an inclusive growth, and also promoting the economic transition from informal sectors to sector reformers. Almost two-thirds of the population of the world lives in precarious conditions. And this is not just a challenge for economies and the world, but also for the destruction of jobs in this disruptive era. And where we see three factors, and that is the new ways of communication and bioengineering, something that has changed the world, creating social pouches that put at risk political and social governance, and finally sustainable growth for development. Because it's a good thing to differentiate growth and development, but nevertheless to just leave it as statistics without reflecting the reality in each country. And this is how this was approved by the 21 countries which, throughout the second week of December, in Lima, set as a priority agenda. But we know that this forum also allows to make different proposals from different perspectives in different areas. And this is what we hope that APEC 24 will do. That is, we hope that it will come out of the box in order to promote cooperation, not just in Asia Pacific. But we hope that this will be a great opportunity to tell the world that we are going to prioritize trade and investments, but we want to be part of global solutions. We are quite fortunate to have Korea here as well, because they do take on the presidency immediately after Peru. So I'm going to ask the Prime Minister to provide his perspective on what his goals are. But obviously at the same time, Korea has put forth quite coherent Indo-Pacific strategy, which I think will sort of frame the approach to the region in the coming years as well. So I wanted to ask him to take the floor now to talk a little bit about Korea's perspective. Maybe bring in, I suppose, as a good segue to talk a little bit about your perspectives on security and climate issues, supply chain issues, if you may. And maybe frame everything in the, again, a very nice tagline that you have framing your Indo-Pacific strategy, which is free, peaceful, and prosperous. Maybe talk about the free and the peaceful part as well, Mr. Prime Minister. Thank you very much. I'd like to, first, would like to emphasize and that I was surprised recently that, yes, previously there was a rather more coherent emphasizing of the importance of this region. But as we went through some of the countries, now many European countries are very much interested in the Indo-Pacific, and they actually publicly presented their Indo-Pacific strategy, including France and others. So this Indo-Pacific region is now getting a renewed attention quite a little bit different from the previous one. But two things are clear in this region. One, this is the most economically dynamic region. And second, this region has the elements and characteristics of diversity from a very high-tech, advanced, technologically advanced country to the countries who think that they are being left behind, and also the countries with great resources while the others are very much poor in their natural endowments. So, but one thing is clear. This region, because of its diversity and its dynamic characteristics of their growth process, mainly from globalization, not enforcing more regulatory framework or, you know, restraining some of the private initiatives, but always we went into the, you know, characters of market economy, globalization, cooperation, and cooperation with the world. I think that there are three elements now at this juncture we can emphasize in this region. The first one, the fact that was taken for granted that globalization will continue should be subject to some kind of, you know, a little bit different way to look at that globalization. Geopolitical situations are changing in this region. Whether we like it or not is a fact that we must take for granted. Then certainly some responses should be made. And this supply chain, whether I should say disruptions, but some supply chain, you know, the challenges are actually occurring in this region. And some kind of dynamic shifting of their, or relocation of their production consumption, you know, structures should change. So this region is subject to the exposure to the result of the, you know, global supply chain shifting. But at the same time, without this region, the acceptance and accommodation to respond to that, you know, supply chain shifting, it will be a little bit hard for this region to go to completely very different continents or to the countries very far from this region. So the problem is occurring here.  That's the challenge which we are now, we should address in this region. Of course, intergovernmental as well as private cooperation is important in taking this issue into a more acceptable level of accommodations. Businesses are understanding the issues. And at the government level, we have, you know, some kind of Indo-Pacific economic framework of prosperity, supply chain agreements that are actually acting to address these issues. The second issue I'd like to emphasize is how to address the climate change as a whole of this region, but also as an individual country. You know, this region accounts for 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions. And the key, yes, we have a lot of areas that we should, you know, react to this kind of quite unfortunate fact. But the most important one will be the energy transition. And I don't think that this region is so good at renewable energy, solar or wind. They still have a lot of challenges to make a real dent in energy transition. So I'd like to propose a new initiative by Korea, which was made public at the General Assembly session by our presidents, which is called Carbon Free Energy Initiative. That is just a kind of consultation body, which will take into account all the general emission impacts of the sources of energy, not 100% limiting to solar and winds, including hydrogen, including nuclear, and renewable, of course, and the new sources of energy that will emerge in the process of our technological breakthrough. So with this initiative, and by joining from a lot of countries and members of this region, we would like to make carbon neutral Pacific. We are also cooperating with Pacific Islands countries where climate change is an existential threat, and Korea would like to be a green ladder to breach the climate gap. We will use our ODA, and Korea will increase its contributions to multilateral climate funds, including Green Climate Fund and GGGI. The last point I'd like to make is that we should cooperate on reinforcing the platform, cooperative platform, for making our growth potential in this region. That is cooperation for sustained and inclusive economic growth, and importance of rule-based open and fair economic order, digital innovation, inclusive growth will be the main elements of the directions and ways we would like to pursue corporations in this region for growth in the future. APEC is very important. APEC has led regional corporations through rulemaking, command vision, and action plan. And APEC set forth through Zaya Vision 2040 in 2020, three pillars, trade and investment, innovation and digitalization, sustainable and inclusive growth.  So there's some worries and concerns whether in these geopolitical situations APEC will be capable enough to draw some agreements and so on. But in San Francisco I really would like to command the United States for its leadership in making under these situations, making agreed statements, which has a lot of very important elements. Korea will continue these efforts next year and we would like to leverage APEC again on the basis of government as well as private partnership. And we would like to reinforce the corporations among the private businesses in this region with close corporations from the government. Thank you. Thank you Prime Minister. Minister Ollengren, if I could now turn the questions to you as well. And I think you will provide a very interesting perspective as we sort of segue to include the talk about security issues as a partner of the region from the outside looking in. Maybe you could explain the context to which obviously the EU and your country the Netherlands has very recently stepped up its cooperation and engagement with the Pacific. Tell us why this is sort of a new step forward for you and to what extent external partners such as yourself see the importance of the Pacific in setting sort of the groundwork for the rest of the world. Well thank you for that question. I think for the Netherlands it sort of comes natural because we have been a seafaring nation for centuries and that means for us that principle is something that we value very much because free seas mean free trade. And Indo-Pacific is an important region to us. We were one of the first countries to have such a strategy as the Prime Minister of Korea mentioned, a strategy for the Indo-Pacific and many other European countries have followed suit. And I think it's also important to show our partners in that region that even now as of course we are very preoccupied by the war in Ukraine that does not distract us from continuing to be a reliable partner to the countries in the Pacific and a credible partner to the countries in the Indo-Pacific. And there are several reasons for that. I think first of all because the globalization and the interconnectivity is on every level and in every area. So as Minister of Defence I deal with security issues but you cannot discuss security issues without thinking about cyber and hybrid threats without thinking about the economic resilience that we need or climate change as was just mentioned that is really interconnected. I think also for our global economy and the prosperity that we want for people we need to uphold the principle of the free seas. We have seen it you know the Black Sea when it was not free the whole world was disrupted. Africa was directly affected by the fact that the grain from Ukraine couldn't pass through the Black Sea and that was a bit of a wake-up call. We're seeing it today in the Red Sea as the vessels cannot pass through anymore have to make a detour it's two weeks extra and that means that a lot of people are being affected by this and businesses being affected by this. So the principle of the free sea is very important and it's part of our rule-based order that we also must uphold and the question is how can we do that and how can we cooperate with the partners in the Indo-Pacific. To give you a concrete example is that we have decided that we will dispatch a frigate every second year to do the route through the region and it's much appreciated by the countries in the region. And of course we do not come alone we partner up with other countries European countries United States and of course the countries in the region and I think that is very significant to contribute to the principle of the free seas and by actually showing presence by actually reaching out by cooperating by doing joint exercises together also to show that in there is really not a far away and that also means if we ask something of our partners in the Indo-Pacific because we are concerned about something that happens in Europe it goes two ways. We are of course very impressed by the Republic of Korea and the defense industry that they built and we now see also the necessity of having reliable partners in that field and those partners and we will talk a lot about strategic autonomy in inside Europe and I think that is something we have to work upon but that does not mean that we turn a blind eye to those partners who are extremely reliable and important and innovative and the last point perhaps to make is the geopolitical situation I think we really have to take that into account. We see tensions building up in many places in the world and I already discussed Ukraine Middle East of course as we speak the Sahel in Africa but also in the Indo-Pacific and be it North Korea China Taiwan the maritime presence in the South China Sea there are so many possible threats that could occur and that could lead towards further instability to prevent that and also to work on deterrence I think these partnerships are extremely important and we feel it's very for us it comes natural as seafaring nation but also I think being part of the European Union knowing the importance of this economic prosperity and knowing how economic prosperity and stability and thus security are linked to each other thank you minister obviously the Netherlands being a seafaring nation is obvious and close to the heart of those of us here from Southeast Asia so glad to hear that Mike I'm going to turn to you now and you are the only non-politician on this panel so the question I'm going to represent diversity the question I'm going to ask you therefore maybe a little bit more academic in making you sort of provide a perspective as well on the United States obviously this is a complicated year for many of us all around the world with elections you will have one too you see ongoing wars that are going on in the Middle East and Europe with all this sort of as the backdrop how confident are you that the United States will continue to lead in the ways that has that have already been outlined by this panel economically strategically and what is the capacity to do so this year and how would they do it well let me start by building on the prime minister's comments about the dynamism of the region this region and I'm defining it as the Indo-Pacific the word half comes to mind this over the last few decades this region is accounted for half global GDP growth half manufacturing growth half the growth in trade half of all patents almost half of all research and development spending half of foreign direct investment half the from a demographic perspective half the growth in working age adults it's a very dynamic region now it doesn't mean that doesn't have its problems the demographics it's grown a lot of working age adults but many Asian countries specific Indo-Pacific countries face serious demographic challenges including Japan and China also 97 percent of all of the global emissions growth come from this region and yet it's some of the most vulnerable countries in the world the island nations of the South Pacific who are facing the challenges of climate change I just say that by way of context that the US has made it clear that it is a Pacific nation and while it obviously maintains very strong alliances with Europe and it's very strongly engaged in the rest of the world the Middle East and elsewhere it is also a Pacific nation I think endemic or a symbol of that was the fact that even while these wars were going on President Biden did convene the APEC conference that the Prime Minister referred to in San Francisco and demonstrated the continuing commitment of the US to the region the last few years has been this debate about in the region about don't make us choose between the US and China Singapore chief among those who make that argument I think we've actually sort of moved on from that argument in terms of US engagement in the world I think we've done it for a couple reasons one I think there's more of a consensus within the Asia Pacific region in the Pacific region of the nature of the China challenge whether it's the use of economic coercion against Japan and Korea or the South the militarization of the South China Sea or the challenges to the Philippines most recently on on its stake in the South China Sea or the Belt and Road Initiative which has been seen to have downsides as well as upsides US at the same time I think has come forward with a number of additional pieces of architecture for the Indo-Pacific the Quad, AUKUS, the trilateral engagement with Japan and South Korea, IPEF this new IPEF investment mechanism to attract investment focus on infrastructure the global infrastructure initiative for the Asia Pacific and I think rather than asking countries to choose one or the other I think we're all getting used to a world in which there's not a China block and there's not a US block in the Indo-Pacific but in fact it's more polyamorous one might say right the countries use India as an example since they're not represented on the panel India loves the United States for technology for nuclear cooperation it loves Russia for munitions it loves Iran for oil and I think we're all getting used to the fact that we'll be loved by some for some reasons and they will love others for other reasons and all that does is point to the need to be much more a much more complex world and the need to be much more sophisticated in how we engage in our relations across the Indo-Pacific we can't expect people to be in one camp or the other I think we're getting the US is getting used to that to answer your question about the nature of US leadership but we can provide alternatives and provide mechanisms to cooperate with others where it matters most the last thing I would say is and this I think has been very important really since Prime Minister Abe's rise in in in Japan the Asia Pacific is not waiting and the Indo-Pacific is not waiting for the United States to coordinate ASEAN continues to strengthen itself CPTPP continues to grow Singapore has been a leader in developing digital economic partnerships and agreements and it's finding its own way to develop alternatives and to balance the other natural forces in the region including China while attracting the United States to be continuously engaged thanks Mike as I said I was going to open the floor up to questions after this but you have another two minutes to think about them because Minister Gonzalez Soletre you've asked for the floor to respond to something which is very good please go ahead yes thank you very much I would like to build on what Mr Prime Minister of South Korea has said he was talking about globalization just like the minister from the Netherlands was saying making emphasis on armed conflicts at the same time Mr Fromman was talking about mechanisms for cooperation well besides all of that I think that today more than ever today more than ever we can paraphrase what a Nobel Prize awarded has said which is that beyond war and beyond politics we cannot deny reality and possibly the mother of all battles will not be the current conflicts that are very serious we must say and we need to solve them however I think that the most important thing will be the consequences that derive from those conflicts for example for example job reductions um illiterate or what we could we can call a neo illiterate people people who lose their job after 50 years old and they cannot be reinserted into the working life so with all these armed conflicts we are creating a world where inclusion will not find its place anymore however because we are experiencing many threats to social security in many countries in just a couple of tickets of this millennia things have changed radically only we have foreseen actually that in 15 years old jobs will disappear children going to school in america and preparing them themselves for the future when they grow when they when they're gonna grow old they will not be prepared for the new world so this is disrupting current and future markets and it's creating this asymmetry of economics in the region so we are facing a moral dilemma what should we do as economists and as governments and at the same time we have the possibility of managing in artificial intelligence and to make good use of it so this is an existential dilemma as well as a conclusion i would say that development and the better economy is are not enough we need to focus on the social insecurity and injustice that we are living today such as in exclusion and job losses in japan for example there are certain hotels with no workers hotels that are managed by an artificial intelligence so this is a challenge we need to increase the amount of investment but at the same time we need to find disruptive solutions and solutions that will provide us with alternatives to face the world of the future and so that the people who were born during covid are going to be able to face this new social Darwinism that's the final comments that i wanted to say thank you very much i will now have a little bit of time for questions from the floor the only thing i would ask is when you do put up your hands the mic will come to you and please stand up as you ask the question thank you hi brad olson i'm an economist from new zealand and also one of the global shapers just a very brief comment before the question i i fear that the panel might have forgotten the second half of the pacific that's in the south and i recognize that there's not many of us representatives here but i guess a question to the panel how do you see that engagement going with those countries that don't have as much resource that don't have that much ability to be on the global stage there's not representation here at davos from australia from new zealand from most of the pacific islands um you know we are quite literally a world away how do you see that engagement happening is it country to country bilaterally is it through multilateral organizations a peck asian how does that engagement look as you know there is a lot of fraction in the region there is a lot of concern there is a lot of other issues how do you engage with those other countries thanks thanks a lot i think the prime minister made reference to that as well in terms of the assistance and the focus that they will have career as far as the pacific island is concerned about i'll probably make the prime minister take that on if you could and the floor if anyone else would like to take it on as well after that please let me know well there is no single solutions to this problem uh we should do it on an individual basis uh you know individuals individual countries that are in this region and private sector is also very important in in reducing and reducing the size of the problems by cooperating with the with the government and at the same time in some kind of you know platforms like a pack will be a quite an important platforms for us to engage we have been trying from 1989 through the a pack we made a vision we we made a concrete discussions on trade and investments how how can how to ensure inclusivity in that process i don't think that we have been successful 100 but the focus was always there so but what is good in this region is that yes there are some disparities and discrepancies among the members but in overall as mike has just said we are getting stronger and we are getting much better than before we have some rooms for maneuver so i think that uh you know on an individual basis through oda and also you know cooperative oda i should say maybe japan korea us can work together to help those countries left behind through various ways and also individual countries we can do it korea this this year we increased 43 percent of our oda and by 2030 we will double the current you know amount and pacific islands countries are clearly our one of the main targets for creating and working platforms to work together we had a summit meeting with pacific islands last year may and we will do it with some of the cn members yes so so i think that future is it's not so bleak it's bright and here there is a potential there's a willingness and there is some financial you know leveraging process we can do it maybe i'll ask a mike to help chime in as well because i mean when we look at a pacific and i and i and i sympathize with the question because the a large part of the pacific obviously we look at in terms of the potential and the strength of the the main countries like united states and china and korea in the pacific but on the other side you have the pacific islands the south pacific who on issues like climate change will be the worst affected as well maybe take us back to your time at the us tr and in the administration how you approach those questions in terms of approaches towards assistance in terms of strategic issues for that part of the pacific well i i think that excuse me i think the uh those vulnerable countries are getting more and more attention in fact eight out of ten of the most recent climate disasters came from this region uh and you see a lot of competition for the attention of the pacific island nations between the us china other uh other forces in the in the in the region as well are engaged with them to try and figure out how to take this forward the world bank under ajabanga laid out a toolkit for climate disasters very much with the small island nations in mind and how to make sure that they had what they needed in order to address this but it's going to be an ongoing set of issues including what happens in islands where it becomes increasingly uninhabitable i don't think of australia and new zealand as poor nations in the south pacific by the way new zealand punches way above its weight internationally including on trade and on on on climate and australia obviously plays a very critical role including on security issues around around the world we just saw it in the in the red sea their participation as well but i think collectively we all need to focus on the most vulnerable countries and do what we can in terms of mobilizing resources finding ways of using blended finance there's issues around climate resilient debt covenants i'm sure you know more about it than uh than i do and how to and that that work has begun at the mdb's the multilateral development banks but there's still a lot more work to be done to refocus their balance sheets and what can be done through insurance and other mechanisms to try and address their particular needs of adaptation we've almost run out of time before i get to wrapping up i just want to make sure that there's no one final quick question um to be asked i'm mr maru the trade minister papanikini good morning everyone and thank you again for the panel um i wanted to say this is uh the leader of the pacific in terms of the biggest nation of the pacific i want to remind our audience papanikini is a third of the nations the world's rainforest we are the lungs of the world after now court meeting after court meeting our people have not been able to monetize carbon credit or able to access any sort of funding from all these climate funds that we talk about they all want to preserve forest they want to support the world but there's no incentive we have a choice of deforestation continuing to do logging operation or to bring it to a halt and assist the world at this time but right now all the great nations like the us they keep talking they keep polluting but we have the funds to support nations like ours who are the lungs of the world we want to do more but there's no incentive and this esteemed audience need to be reminded of that the other factor our small vulnerable island states were really affected by climate change you don't see funds available to even build seawalls for that matter no one is stepping forward to provide assistance in this area they are really innocent island nations and they're really being affected by major industrialized nations of the world and your actions to continue to follow the environment I think something more needs to be done and I came here to echo their voice and to stress that the time for talking is over we must see action now to support island nations who are really affected by climate change and to support nations like Papua New Guinea to preserve our forests so we continue to be lungs of the world thank you thank you minister um on that note I think your message has been heard loud and clear I think at least the panelists here would be fully aware of the responsibilities and the next steps forward um on that front can I ask each one of the panelists um unfortunately these things uh time often flies and we wish we had more time if you could recap uh if you imagine yourselves now in 2025 we're sitting here again in January and we're looking at sort of a post-mortem of how we did in 2024 would you see and how what would you see in terms of the good news that will come out of the Pacific in terms of the leadership it is going to provide whether it is within the realm of APEC or external partners looking in um give us a sense of what you hope to see uh this coming year might maybe start with you and then we'll end with the prime minister well I'd say if when we were here last year uh there was a lot of concern a lot of discussion about the U.S.-China relationship around decoupling etc and I think this year we've already seen some significant progress in terms of stabilizing the relationship based on the summit meeting that President Biden President Xi had in November in California I think one of the areas of potential good news while there's so much other less than good news out there in the world is that the U.S.-China relationship may be stable throughout 2024 and that hopefully in 2025 we can continue to build on that stability to actually make progress on outstanding issues very good thanks minister so you talked about leadership so you were talking about leadership how our leadership is going to be in 2024 and 2025 and here I come with my own perspective the perspective of a very peaceful country a country with a long-standing tradition for peace we consider and thought hegemonic leaderships and individual leaderships should open the way for a collective leadership with shared values avoiding the dichotomy between what we say and what we do let me give you an example yesterday in a closed session sorry I cannot disclose the comments that were spoken and who said those comments but I can tell you that one of the participants said that there was this like these double standards because people make wishes that concern everybody good wishes best wishes for everybody however when we look at what they do we see a very big difference and that difference also remains in the public opinion so I would I would prefer a shared leadership a collective leadership with shared values and this does not imply becoming a big powerful country but having the moral authority and the exemplarity of doing what we say and saying what you what we do so in 2025 I would like for this a shared and collective leadership to be appreciated and shared at the end of the day excellent thank you minister all in good now what's your office well as a minister of defense of course I see that defense spending in the Indo-Pacific is is on the rise I also see alliances that are are being being formed and tensions that are there rising diminishing but still there in a very complex situation so I think it's crucial to have dialogue continued dialogue also between our part of the world and the Indo-Pacific United States and all countries involved we have the European Union and NATO to organized contexts in which we can have that dialogue also with other parts of the world it's extremely important to keep that going I think but the most important thing is that we all agree on the rule-based order that we all agree that we can we can have our differences and we have we make different choices as nations and as countries but that we all uphold this rule-based order because it profits all of us every single country and that would be my wish for next year that there that we have that common base that we have that common ground and that leads us towards well maybe increased defense spending but also in the understanding that military conflicts usually don't solve things they only increase instability and lead to different questions on how to stop military conflicts so for deterrence yes but for actually starting military conflicts that would be very very bad step thank you thank you Prime Minister you have the final minute of this panel well on a macro terms I think next year will be much more price stabilizing here and you know with the subsiding of the inflation very high interest rate will be will not be accelerated on the basis of that I think some countries in this in the specific countries like Korea will put more emphasis of his policy on some kind of solidarity and we will work more closely with Pacific Islands and ASEAN members mainly in digitalization processes how to make how to contribute to not increasing the disparities but you know contributing in its own way with the projects with those countries that they are not be left behind in this in this AI world which will be critically will emerge as a as a you know great great equalizer thank you thank you Prime Minister thank you distinguished panelists all of you I'm sorry we extended a little bit over time but thank you much for very much for staying with us thank you


Ladies and gentlemen, the story you're about to hear is true. The names have been changed to protect the innocent. Dragnet, brought to you by Chesterfield, America's most popular two-way cigarette. Chesterfield king size at the new low price, and Chesterfield regular.  You're assigned a homicide detail. On the way back to the office, you receive a call. It's about an attempted suicide. You're in the immediate vicinity. Your job? Check it out. Who do you like in the World Series? New York Giants? Cleveland Indians? I guess that question is on everybody's mind right now. Of course, the series starts Wednesday at New York's famous polo grounds. Then the action moves to Cleveland's great municipal stadium. You fans who have been to these great ball parks know they have one thing in common. The giant Chesterfield scoreboard signs, which instantly flash the official scorer's decision. It's a hit. Yes, sir, as the big signs say, Chesterfield's a hit with baseball fans everywhere, with millions of smokers around the country. It's America's most popular two-way cigarette. Whether you enjoy the World Series at the ball park, on TV or radio, there's one thing for sure. You'll enjoy it much more with Chesterfield. In the whole wide world, no cigarette satisfies like a Chesterfield. Buy Chesterfield king size or Chesterfield regular, both at the same price in most places. Get a carton today. Dragnet, the documented drama of an actual crime. For the next 30 minutes in cooperation with the Los Angeles Police Department, you will travel step-by-step on the side of the law through an actual case transcribed from official police files. From beginning to end, from crime to punishment, Dragnet is the story of your police force in action. It was Tuesday, March 24th. It was windy in Los Angeles. We were working the night watch out of homicide detail. My partner's Frank Smith. The boss is Captain Warman. My name's Friday. We were answering an ambulance follow-up, attempted suicide. It was 11.52 p.m. We got to 2296 Whitworth Drive, front door. Places sure learn that.  Yeah. You're the police? Yes, ma'am. This is Frank Smith. My name's Friday. Come on in. Thank you. He's in there to study. Who is it? Carl Hamlin. Are you Mrs. Hamlin? Yes. The door is locked, huh? Hamlin. Hamlin. Come on, open the door. He has a gun that he was going to kill himself. Yes, ma'am. Is there another key to this door? No. Well, give me a hand, Frank, and try to force it. Yeah. All right. Wait a minute, wait a minute. Let's try it this way. All right. Come on. This isn't not a gift. No. Is there another way into the room, ma'am? No, this is the only door. How about windows? What? Windows leading into it. Yes, off the front porch. Came in here drunk because of the scene. Down this way? Yes. There's the window here? Yes, there is. Can you see anything? No, let me have your flashlight. Yeah, here you go. Yeah. I can see him there on the floor. Can't you do something? He might still be alive. Well, the screen's locked. You got something to cut it with? Just a minute. Try these keys. That's got it. Good. Let's see if we can get the window open. Yeah. I can't. I'm going to have to break this, ma'am. Well, I don't care as long as you get to him. All right. I'm going to hold the light for him. Yeah. You better stand back, ma'am. The glass is here.  All right. Can you reach the latch from there? Wait a minute. Yeah, I think so. Yeah, I got it. I'll give you a hand then. Can you see if he's still alive? Just a minute. We'll have to get into the room first, ma'am. Watch your step there, Jeff. Yeah. All right, come on. I'll give you a hand. All right. As soon as the ambulance gets here, will you show the attendant how to get in? Yes. Can you tell if he's alive yet? No, ma'am. I'm not sure. You want to get the door? I'll check the victim. Yeah. How about it? You know, we better have the attendant look at him. All right. Take a look at that. I wonder if we could enforce the door. Well, the chair and the knob. Locked and bolted. They must have wanted real privacy. Looks like he's got it now. That's the room right there. Yes, ma'am. Hi. How are you? He's dead. You want to wait in there, ma'am? I didn't think he'd really do it. Just a minute. No, nothing. He's dead. That his wife? Yeah. I'm sorry to have to do this, ma'am, but there are a couple of things I've got to know. Go ahead. You want to give me his full name? Carl Hamlin. His age? 43. Does he live here? No. We had a house over in Bronson, 947. Do you have to go through all this? No, that's all, Mrs. Hamlin. I'll get the rest of it later. Frank. Yeah? You want to finish up here? Sure. It's all so wrong. Carl's dead. It's all wrong. Yes, ma'am. Is there anything we can get for you? No. Do you want to go in the other room and sit down? That's better. Would you like to call your doctor for you? I've already called him from my mother. He's on the way over. Where is she now? In the back bedroom. She's lying down. This whole thing's been a shock for her. Yes, ma'am. I understand. When I talked to it, he said for me to give her one of the spells he prescribed. He's supposed to make her sleep. Mm-hmm. You're going to have to talk to her. Yes, we probably will. I hope you won't have to do it tonight. This whole thing's been a terrible shock to her. She's not too well anyway. Well, we'll try to avoid upsetting her any further. I'd appreciate it more than I could tell you. All right, Miss Hamlin. There are a few questions we've got to ask if you feel up to answering them. I might as well get it over with. What do you want to know? Do you want to tell us what happened? Well, Carl came over tonight drunk. He caused a big scene. Your husband doesn't live here, then? No, we're separated. I see. Who was here when the shooting took place? A mother and myself. Anybody else living here? No, just the two of us. All right. What time did Mr. Hamlin get here? I'm not sure. I was asleep. How big of a party? I was asleep. I don't know. Carson, you weren't expecting him, then? No, no. The last time I saw him, I told him to leave me alone. That I'd get a court order if I had to. We've been separated about a week this time. This isn't the first time, I know. No, there's been other times. This was the worst. I told him I was finished, but I didn't want anything more to do with him. He's been calling. Here, where I work, most of the time he was drunk. He kept asking for reconciliation, saying how sorry he was and asking me to take him back. I'm not blaming it all on him. I know some of it was my fault. All right, do you want to go on? He called me this afternoon. He had to see me. Had it all worked out so we could get back together again. I told him I didn't want to see him. I said for him to stay away. He came home and told my mother about it. I said Carl might show up, but if he did, I didn't want to see him. All right, go on. I kind of half expected him to show up, but he didn't. I went to bed. After the 1030 news, mother stayed up to read. First I knew if there was anything wrong when I heard the shot. I got up and came right downstairs.  She told me that Carl was inside, that he'd shot himself. I tried to call him. First I thought he was playing some kind of a joke. My mother said she'd heard Carl fall down in the room. I called you right away. Good job, ma'am. What do you got? DOA slip. I'll put it on the call of photo lab in the corner. Okay. I checked the gun's 38 revolver. One shot fired. I'm going to fit for the story I just got from his wife. Mm-hmm. I'll make the calls. Wonder if I could use your phone, Mrs. Hamlin? What? Like to use your phone, please. Oh, it's in the hall. The table there. Thank you.  Yes, in a way. Why do you mean that? She's over 70, Sergeant Friday. A thing like this isn't easy to go through at that age. I see. Well, my mother and Carl didn't get along. He always said that she caused the trouble between us. He told me a couple of times that if she'd keep her nose out of our business, we might be able to get along. Uh-huh. Wonder if it'd be possible for us to talk to her. You have to. Yes, ma'am, we do. I'll go see. All right, thank you. Crew's on the way, John. Is there going to be more policemen out here? Yes, ma'am. We'll try to make it as brief as possible. I'd appreciate it. We'll do everything we can. I'll go get my mother. Thank you. She gave you the story? What does she know? What do you mean? She says she wasn't in the room at the time her mother saw it happen. She'd turn anything in the other room.  Can you sit over here, mother? Yes, dear. These men want to ask you some questions. This is my mother, Mrs. Gaylor. Sergeant Friday. This is Officer Smith. How do you do, ma'am? All right, ma'am. How do you do? We'll try to make this as brief as possible, Mrs. Gaylor. Just a couple of questions we've got to ask. You go right ahead. Are you tired, mother? You tell them and they'll stop. Yes, dear.  I'm not sure. I think it was about 11.30. No, I told me Mr. Hamlin might be coming over. But that time at night, you'd hardly expect anybody to come call him, would you? No, ma'am. He did. He always was doing something no one else did. I think he just sat around and tried to figure things to do that was different. Mm-hmm. Like tonight, came in drunk, yelled about how he wanted to have a showdown. I didn't know what he was talking about. Mm-hmm. Started to yell at me. Told me how the split-up was my fault. Started to curse at me. Mm-hmm. I'm 73, Mr. Friday. I've seen a lot of things. I've met a lot of people. Isn't anybody who can talk to me like that? I told Mr. Hamlin. Told him to get out of the house. That's when he pulled this gun out of his pocket. Yes, ma'am. Had it right in his coat, the outside pocket. I see. I told him. I said, Mr. Hamlin.  That's what I said to him. Oh, ma'am. He just looked at me and said, Yeah, you'd like that, wouldn't you? Those are the exact words. Then he told me how he was going to kill himself to show me. Mm-hmm. I thought it was some kind of dramatics. But Hamlin was that kind, you know, always play acting around. Yes, ma'am. Not this time. Next thing I know, he ran into a study and locked the door. After that, there was a shot and I heard him fall down. Right then is when Nora came into the room. Oh, I'm Miss Gaylor. I think we have all the information we need now. Okay, if I go to bed then. Yes, ma'am. Right ahead. Good night, then. You want to help me, dear? Yes, mother. I'll be right with you. I'll be waiting up for you. Mr. Friday. Yes, ma'am. Anything more you want to know about Mr. Hamlin? I'll tell you. No, I don't think there'll be anything else, ma'am. There is. I'll tell you. All right. Thank you, Miss Gaylor. I'll be in my room, though. All right, mother. I'll be right there. I mean, it's a lot better than I thought she would. Miss Hamlin. Yes. Did your husband ever talk about suicide before? Yes, several times. Just this last week, I thought he was being dramatic again. I didn't pay much attention to him. It's so hard to tell if he was drunk or if he really meant something. Well, the years we were married, I don't think he was ever really serious. You got it wrong, haven't you? He was this time. 1.14 a.m. The photographer got to the house and took pictures of the room. The coroner removed the body to the county morgue, and at 2.37 a.m., Frank and I left the house. We went back to the office and filled out the 3.11.1 form, listing the death of Carl Martin Hamlin as a suicide. Frank called the coroner's office to find when we could get the results of the autopsy. They told us we'd have unnecessary information like that afternoon. 3.18 a.m. We signed out of the office and went home. At 10.15 a.m., Frank and I left the house. At 10.15 that morning, we got a call from Ray Pinker. He asked us to come right over to the crime lab. We were running a routine check this morning. Came up with a couple of things I think you'd like to know. All right, what do you got, Ray? Yeah, take a look. This is a bullet we fired from the gun found in the victim's hand. Yeah. Now, there. You can see it weighs 130 grains. Uh-huh. Now, this is the bullet that killed the man. Take a look. That's all out of shape. See anything else? Well, looks all right to me. Yeah, what are you building, Ray? Well, I checked this one pretty carefully. Made sure that all of it was here. You know that none of the lead had been sheared off my bone tissue. Yeah. None missing. It's complete. Yeah. Now, take a look. Yeah, let me put this one on the scales. Now, check it yourself. 95 grains. Yeah. 35 grains difference. Let me show you something else here. I figured the length of both bullets. They don't check out either. What's it mean, Ray? Bullet that killed Hamlin's a 380. It's a European calibration. Uh-huh. Gun he had in his hands, a .38 revolver. Yeah. 380's automatic ammunition. Yeah. This fellow Hamlin pulled a pretty neat trick. Well, what do you mean, Ray? He killed himself with a bullet that couldn't possibly be fired from the gun he was holding. Huh. Sometimes you're out of place. Yeah. Might as well tear up the forms you filled out on this one. No suicide. Yeah. You gotta find a murder gun. You are listening to Dragnet, the authentic story of your police force in action. Today, one-way cigarettes, one size, that is, are almost obsolete because they just don't give smokers what they want. Either way, you'll like Chesterfield best. It's America's most popular two-way cigarette because only Chesterfield gives you the right combination of the world's best tobaccos. Tobaccos that are highest in quality, low in nicotine. Best for you. You and I smoke for relaxation, for comfort, for satisfaction. And in the whole wide world, no cigarette satisfies like a Chesterfield. You smoke with the greatest possible pleasure when your cigarette is Chesterfield. Yes, these six words, highest in quality, low in nicotine, mean Chesterfield is best for you. Get a carton of Chesterfields. Chesterfield regular. Chesterfield king size. Both at the same price in most places. This is the best. Chesterfield. And the time to change today. 11.12 a.m. Frank and I along with Ray Pinker left the crime lab and we drove out to see Nora Hamlin. From the physical evidence on hand, the way the door had been locked and the fact that the windows had been bolted from the inside, it appeared unlikely that anybody could have left the room after Carl Hamlin had been shot. Yet from the information we'd gotten from Pinker, there had to be another gun involved in the killing. 11.24 a.m. We got to the house on Whitmore Drive. Good morning. I didn't expect to see you back so soon. You want to come in? Yes, ma'am. Ms. Hamlin, this is Mr. Pinker from our crime lab. Ray, Ms. Hamlin. It's nice to know you, Mr. Pinker. How do you do? Are there some more questions you have to ask? Yes, ma'am, that's all right. I wonder if we could take another look at the study. Sure. Didn't the man who were here last night get what they needed? Well, we'd just like to check it again with Mr. Pinker here. Uh-huh. Well, you know where it is. How's your mother feeling this morning? She had a good sleep. The doctor gave her a sedative. She's still in bed. We'll try not to disturb her. Well, you go ahead with what you have to do. I'm trying to get the house in order. If there's anything you want, I'll be across the hall. Thank you. Thanks. Right over here, Ray. Mm-hmm. This is where we found him. You can see there where we had to break the window to get in. Mm-hmm. Right? Yeah. You got that sketch you made last night? Yeah. Yeah, here it is. Want to take a look, Ray? Yeah. You can see the body was about here. Mm-hmm. Over here. And the feet were about here. That's about right, isn't it, Joe? Yeah. It was right next to the chair there. Mm-hmm. That's the way I got it there. Just about on the perfect line between the floor lamp and the chair over there. Mm-hmm. What about the gun? In his right hand. Was the gun in his hand when you found him? Yeah, that's right. Pictures from the photo lab will bear that out. Sure is out in left field. How do you mean? I talked to Doc Newbar when he sent the bullet over. Mm-hmm. The way he described the wound, it's pretty tough to buy that a right-handed man could shoot himself so the slug would end up where it did. Exactly how do you mean? Well, the bullet entered just to the right of the center of his chest. About here. Uh-huh. Came to rest under the right arm. Here. Line of travel's way off. Sure would have been an easier way to do it, huh? Yeah. What about the door when you found it? We'll show you how it was locked. Give me that chair, Frank. Yeah. There you go. No. The key was turned. The bolt was thrown. And then this chair was propped up under the knob like this. Mm-hmm. How about the key? Was it still in the lock? Yeah. It sure looks like he meant the door to stay shut. Yeah, we could figure that. The place looks pretty solid. Blaster walls. Not much chance of anybody getting through them. Mm-hmm. You checked the bookcases? What do you mean? And you haven't pulled away from the wall? Well, I looked at them last night. They all seemed solid enough. Mm-hmm. Now, you got any ideas, Ray? I don't know. The way that door looks, the rest of the room, doesn't seem likely anybody could have shot him then going outside and locked the door. I think they could have come in through the window. You had to break it? Yeah. Well, it's set up. You shouldn't have any trouble finding the suspect. What do you mean? Find a butler a bit like an envelope. How do you find him? You didn't see a shell casing around last night, did you? There wasn't any reason to look for it. Mm-hmm. There's no sign of one now. Looks like the room's been cleaned. Yeah. Well, I guess we better check with the Hamlin woman, huh? We'll get this stuff away from the door. Ms. Hamlin? Ms. Hamlin? Oh, yes, Sister Matt. Something you want? Yes, Matt. Has anybody been in the study since we left last night? I didn't know. I wasn't supposed to. You've been saying about it. Well, did you clean the room? Yes, I told you. I was straightening up the house. I ran the vacuum in here. Did you see an empty shell casing? I don't know what you mean. Well, it looks like this, ma'am. See? The brass part on this bullet. No, I didn't see anything like that. Have you emptied your cleaner since you used it this morning? No. Wonder if we could see it. Sure. I don't understand what this is all about. But if you want to see the vacuum, I'll get it. If you want to tell me where it is, I'll get it for you. Oh, there's no trouble in the closet here in the hall. Can I give you a hand with it? It's not heavy. You want the attachments, too? No, ma'am. Just to clean it itself. All right. There it is. All right, if we use a piece of this newspaper. Sure. Yes, you know what you're doing.  Yeah, just flip that little catch on the side there. If you'll tell me what you're looking for, I might be able to help. How about it, Ray? Yeah. Here it is. 380? Yeah. What's all that mean? Do you have another gun in the house, Ms. Hammond? No. You're pretty sure about that? Yes. What makes you think there might be another one? How many shots did you hear last night, Ms. Hammond? What do you mean? Well, just that. How many shots did you hear? One. How about that? Yes. Why? We've got reason to believe that there were two shots fired. What difference does it make? How many there were? Pretty big difference. Why is it important? My husband killed himself. Can't be sure how many I heard. One, two, three, a half a dozen. What difference does it make? Well, I would try to explain it to you. Your husband was holding a .38 caliber revolver when we found him. But the bullet that killed him came from a .380 automatic. I don't know what you're talking about. What are you trying to say? Well, I don't think you'll understand this.  You're not serious. I'm afraid we are, ma'am. But this whole thing is ridiculous. The evidence makes it true. Who'd kill him? Who'd have a reason? We'd like to know that, too. Would you get your mother, please? What do you want to talk to her about? What if you'd get her? I'm not going to have her dragged into anything. She's had enough trouble. There's no reason for you to make any more. Don't worry about it, Nora. Mother, you shouldn't be out of bed. I heard the talking. I've been listening. I haven't seen you before. You policemen, too? No, ma'am. I'm Ray Pinker. How do you do? Jesse Gaylor. Nora's mother. How are you? Now, what's all this about, Mr. Hamlin? Not killing himself. That's right, Ms. Gaylor. What makes you think it is? A lot of things. Do you have a gun in the house? You mean a pistol? That's right. Might? Why? Where is it? In the table there. Left-hand drawer. I'll get it. How about it? .380. That gun belonged to you, Ms. Gaylor? Yes. My husband had it. Mm-hmm. All this talk about Mr. Hamlin. If he didn't kill himself, who do you think did? Well, that's what we're trying to find out. Uh-huh. But you've got somebody you're looking at, haven't you? Somebody you figured did it? This is your gun. Uh-huh. You're the only person who witnessed the shooting. That's right. Well, why don't you tell us about it? Because if I did, you'd never believe it. We'll give us a try, huh? All right. Mr. Hamlin came here last night, like I said. He was drunk. Came in and started yelling. I was sitting in that chair, reading. He started to curse at me. Yeah. I didn't pay him no mind. Told him to go away. But Nora was through with him. He wouldn't go. Yes, ma'am. All of a sudden, he pulled out a gun and started waving it around. He said if I didn't get Nora, he'd kill himself. I thought it was just some more of his play act. Yes, ma'am. I didn't pay any attention to him. Figured when he was through, he'd go away. I went back to the book. Made him mad or never. Mm-hmm. He grabbed the book out of my hand and shot. Shot right at it. Then he threw it into the fireplace. He threw your book into the fireplace. Is that right? That's right. Just all of a sudden, something happened to me.  I took the gun out of the table then, shot him. Got real scared and ran into the study. Closed the door behind him. Mm-hmm. I heard him lock the door and move something up to the door. Must have been the chair. Yeah. I guess it was. Right after that, I heard him fall down. Right after that, Nora came into the room. Why didn't you tell me, mother? There wasn't any reason to. I had to think about it. But I'd done what I had to do. I was going to call you men this morning and tell you the truth. It really was. You believe that? Well, I guess so. I really was. Just all of a sudden last night when he shot my book, I've never been so mad. I really wanted to kill him. You remember it all pretty well, don't you? Yes, I do. All of it. You want to get a coat, Ms. Gaylor? I'll not take you downtown. Yes, sir. I'll do it right away. Better go with the thing. Yeah. Is it going to be all right? We don't decide that, ma'am. But she told the truth. Isn't that going to make a difference? We'll put it down that way. You want to get that book ready? We're going to need it. Yeah. She didn't say a word about it. Yeah, I know. The story's still pretty hard to believe, isn't it? Here we are. Here's the book handling shot. Slug is still in it. Looks like a 38.  What is it, Mr. Friday? Holy Bible. The story you have just heard is true. The names were changed to protect the innocent. On July 14th, trial was held in Department 96, Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the county of Los Angeles. In a moment, the results of that trial. Now, here is our star, Jack Webb. Thank you, George Fenerman. You notice how many king-size smokers are changing to Chesterfield? Everywhere, king-size smokers are finding it out. No other king-size cigarette has Chesterfield quality.  What a pair. Chesterfield king-size and Chesterfield regular. They satisfy. Jesse Margaret Gaylor was examined by three psychiatrists appointed by the court and found to be insane during the commission of the crime. A sanity hearing was held and she was made a ward of the state. She was placed in the state hospital at Mendocino for treatment. This week, a group of men are meeting in New Orleans for the 61st annual conference of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Dragnet is pleased to extend its best wishes to our top law enforcement officers and to thank them for the protection they give our homes and families. May their convention be an outstanding success. You have just heard Dragnet, the series of authentic cases from official files. Technical advice comes from the Office of Chief of Police W.H. Parker, Los Angeles Police Department. Technical advisors Captain Jack Donahoe, Sergeant Marty Wynne, Sergeant Frans Brasher. Heard tonight were Ben Alexander, Lillian Powell, Olin Suley, Virginia Gregg. Script by John Robinson, Earl Schley. Music by Walter Schumann. Hal Gibney speaking. Watch an entirely different Dragnet case history each week on your local NBC television station. Please check your newspapers for day and time. Chesterfield has brought you Dragnet, transcribed from Los Angeles. Ladies and gentlemen, Gunsmoke brought to you by L&M Filters will now be heard on Saturday night. Chesterfield's Perry Como show will be heard Monday, Wednesday and Friday nights. Consult your radio listings for the time. That's Gunsmoke and the Como show, both on another network. L&M Filters are sweeping the country and the reasons simple. No filter compares with L&M's exclusive miracle tip for quality or for effectiveness. And notice how easy it draws. You get much more flavor, much less nicotine. Yes, only L&M gives you effective filtration and no other cigarette has it. Our statement of quality goes unchallenged. L&M is America's highest quality and best filter tip cigarette by L&M's now king size or regular, both at the same low price.


매우 어려워버린 것 같다 그게 뭐지? 시작해야 되나? 마이크가 망했다 오늘은 인도네시아 틱톡을 보셨나요? 오 오케이 한국인가요? 볼일이 좋아요 네 볼일이 좋아요 뭐를 Balilek한테 잘ût여보는거요? 그리고 아프가고讖어본적은요?  렛츠고 렛츠고 이거 진짜 멋있다 인도네시안 트렌디션 오 진짜? 그 친구가 봤어 그래서 결혼했죠 인도네시안 클로스는 정말 멋있어 안녕하세요 인도네시아 인도네시아 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 네 오우 간단한 것만 아 너무 잘생겼어 그냥 한국말이야? 그게 진짜 귀엽다 케이팝은 블랙핑크? 아 맞다 나의 삶이 괜찮아 자연적 이게 뭐야? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 인도네시아 사람들이 한국말을 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 인도네시아 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 그런데 나는 인도네시아를 잘 못 읽어요 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 한국말 할 줄 알아요? 아 진짜요 너무 긴다 다음년에! 아프리카 가자 이거 어떻게 만들지? 이거 인도네시아의 음식 음식? 아, 오케이 너무 잘생겼어 너무 빨리 만들어졌어 음악이 너무 좋아 너무 빨리 만들어졌어 너무 빨리 만들어졌어 아, 드디어! 오우! 드디어! 오우! 브레이드레이스! 오우! 브레이드레이스! 런덩! 런덩! 브레이드레이스! 고추! 어떻게 먹을 수 있을까요? 이 영상은 아니다. 스파이시풀은 재미없어요. 오우! 오케이, 형. 스파이시풀은 얼마나 뺀 거예요? 쇼핑몰이 와우 멀리시아? 인도니시아? 카카오토 카카오토는 카카오토 카카오토는 카카오토 There are many tall buildings And my studio And the apartment Fancy It's crazy When I pictured Indonesia I'll be honest, I pictured just jungle And just the ocean And I didn't expect the highest guys for neighbors The more you do I'm so pretty 인도니시아 So many So many different clothes That's for Halloween, right? It looks really nice Were those like Traditional Indonesian clothes? Yeah, I think because it's a big country So there are many Different types of tradition And clothes 인도니시아 is so big It's so close to Australia We should take over Korea needs more space Just one island, please One island We're finished What's the same girl? Oh no It's really similar to the Polish flag Oh, it actually is It does I think there might have been using the wrong flag But I talked to people this entire time Because I just picked like a Red Sometimes it's confusing I apologize to Poland I apologize to Indonesia It's okay He dropped but He dropped but hide more Like a mask What do you call it? He cut? Respect Respect You don't have to wear a mask No one's wearing a mask Corona is over It's okay We're all like fully vaccinated Indonesian people help Other countries Africa They do a lot of volunteer work That's good Look at that He's a good guy A true Muslim I don't know if he's a Muslim or not This is true Mashallah Oh cute Maybe he's like stop No more Welcome to Tik Tok What's going on? I'm sure it's funny But to us, we're just like a weirdo We should study Indonesian I think this is kind of trend Follow me Oh We gotta do that Korean version Korea has the Pepsi logo Jesus Christ It was like the Russian flag Russian I think Indonesia was colony of France It was like Netherlands Netherlands Are you Dutch? No They were colony of the Netherlands So they changed the flag To Indonesia for celebration of their independence Netherlands is red, white and blue Yeah I love Indonesia Korea was colony of the Netherlands We have similar history We know about this feeling I really respect that they got Independence from them And I really like proud of them We feel you guys Also independence in Korea Is so important Congratulation for independence When did they gain independence? 1945 1945 August 17th So it's very similar to Korea It's two days We're brothers Yeah We took wrong guy The water is so clean Oh he speaks English Where is he from? It's so clean I'm gonna drink the salty water I think you can You can, so hard Salt is good for you Maybe you're wrong We're not even talking about Video They're pretty girls It's so fancy It's so like Butter Soondag Makasa Mangaeling Bali Bali It's so cool We just have hanbok Yeah But they have a lot of different kinds of things We're done For me It was interesting And also like the ocean It's crazy It's so clean We're jealous of you guys Let's share Maybe if there's a chance I wanna go Indonesia too Especially Bali We should try We should try surfing there Of course I was in Jakarta twice And the food was so amazing I just wanna try a bunch of fried fish Grilled fish Let's go to the fish market That would be awesome So Dan I know these are hard times And with the Omicron virus spreading It's only tough times But let me tell you We're all brothers and sisters And remember Love matters the most Regardless Of our gender Religion Ando made me open my eyes Although it's once blind But now I can see I guess I have so much culture I agree I have so much more to learn about the world Because I thought Ando was just Just an island It's the island It seems like they have everything Yeah Very interesting culture I love Indonesia Aku cinta kanwo Aku cinta Indonesia Hit the like button And subscribe And make sure you get the notification bell too And as always love matters the most And I'll see you next time That was my life Thank you We're brothers Thank you for finishing the video Thank you for watching my video Thank you for inviting us Thank you I have to run back


We were occupied the last time we met and considering the general character and arrangement as regards the fluid portion of a candle and the way in which that fluid got into the place of combustion. And now I have to ask your attention to the means by which we are enabled to ascertain what happens in any particular part of the flame, why it happens, what it doesn't happening, and where after all the whole candle goes to. Because as you know very well, a candle being brought before us and burned disappears if burned properly without the least trace of dirt in the candle stick. And this is a very curious phenomenon. We will examine this dark part first and now I take this bent glass tube and introduce one end into the middle of the flame. You see it once that something is coming from the flame. At the other end, you will see that something from the middle part of the flame is gradually drawn out and goes through the tube and into that flask. And there behaves very differently from what it does in the open air. It not only escapes from the end of the tube but falls down to the bottom of the flask like a heavy substance as indeed it is. We find that it is the wax of the candle made into a vaporous fluid, not a gas, you must learn the difference between a gas and a vapor. A gas remains permanent, a vapor is something that will condense.  This is very different from what you have outside the flame. And in order to make that more clear to you, I'm about to produce and set fire to a larger proportion of this vapor. For what we have in the small way in a candle, to understand thoroughly, we must as scientists produce in a larger way if needful that we may examine the different parts. Here is some wax on a glass flask and I've made it hot as the inside of the candle flame is hot and the matter about the wick is hot.  This then is exactly the same kind of vapor as we have in the middle of the candle. I have arranged another tube carefully in the flame and I was able by a little care to get that vapor to pass through the tube to the other extremity where I will light it and obtain absolutely the flame of the candle that will place distant from it. Now, look at that. It's not that a very pretty experiment and you see from this that there are clearly two different kinds of action. One, the production of the vapor and the other, the combustion of it, both of which take place in particular parts of the candle. I shall get no vapor from that part which is already burnt. If I raise the tube to the upper part of the flame so soon as the vapor has been swept away, what comes away will be no longer combustible. It is already burned. How burned? By burned thus. In the middle of the flame where the wick is, there is this combustible vapor. On the outside of the flame is the air which we shall find necessary for the burning of the candle between the two intense chemical action takes place. Whereby the air and the fuel act upon each other and at the very same time that we obtain light, the vapor itself is consumed. If you examine where the heat of a candle is, you'll find it very curiously arranged. Suppose I take this candle and hold a piece of paper close upon the flame. Where is the heat of that flame? Do you not see that it is not on the inside? It is in a ring exactly in the place where I told you the chemical action was. And even in my irregular mode of making this experiment, if there is not too much disturbance, there will always be a ring because the heat is where the air and the fuel come together. This is most important for us as we proceed with our subject. Air is absolutely necessary for combustion. And what is more, I must have you understand that fresh air is necessary or else we should be imperfect in our reasoning and our experiments. Here is a jar of air. I place it over a candle and it burns very nicely in it at first, showing that what I have said about it is true, but there will soon be a change. See how the flame is drawing upwards, presently fading and at last going out. And going out why? The jar is full of air, partly changed, partly not changed, but it does not contain sufficient of the fresh air which is necessary for the combustion of a candle. These are all points which we as young chemists have to gather up, and if we look a little more closely into this kind of action, we shall soon find certain steps of reasoning extremely interesting. We have the case of the combustion of a candle, we have the case of a candle being put up by the one of air, and we now have the case of imperfect combustion. And this is to us so interesting that I want you to understand it as thoroughly as you do the case of a candle burning in its best possible manner. I will now make a great flame because we need the largest possible illustration. Here is a larger wick made from these cotton balls. All these things are the same as candles after all. If we have larger wicks, we must have a larger supply of air or we shall have less perfect combustion. Now, look at the black substance going up into the atmosphere. There's a regular stream of it. Look at the soot that flies off from the flame. See what an imperfect combustion it is because it cannot get enough air. What then is happening? Why, certain things which are necessary to the combustion of a candle are absent and very bad results are accordingly produced. But we see what happens to a candle when it is burnt in a pure and proper state of air. Recall the charred ring on the paper, and on the other side, you see the burning of a candle produces the same kind of soot, charcoal or carbon. Let me explain to you, as it is quite necessary for our purpose, that although I take a candle and give you as the general result its combustion in the form of a flame, we must see whether combustion is always in this condition or whether there are other conditions of flame. And we shall soon discover that there are and that they are most important to us. Here is a little gunpowder. You know that gunpowder burns with flame, we may fairly call it flame. It contains carbon and other materials which all together cause it to burn with the flame. And here is some pulverized iron or iron filings. Now, I propose burning these two things together. My object being to make the gunpowder set fire to the filings and burn them in the air and thereby show the difference between substances burning with flame and not with flame. Now, here is the mixture. And when I set fire to it, you must watch the combustion and you will see that it is of two kinds.  You will see them burning too, but without the production of flame, they will each burn separately. There is the gunpowder which burns with the flame. And there are the filings. They burn with a different kind of combustion. You see then these two great distinctions and upon these differences depend all the utility and all the beauty of flame which we use for the purpose of giving off light. When we use oil or gas or candle for the purpose of illumination, their fitness all depends on these different kinds of combustion. There are such curious conditions of flame that it requires some cleverness and nicety of discrimination to distinguish the kinds of combustion one from another. For instance, here is a powder which is very combustible consisting, as you see, of separate little particles. It is called lycopodium and each of these particles can produce a vapor and produce its own flame. But to see them burning, you would imagine it was all one flame. I will now set fire to a quantity and you will see the effect. We saw a cloud of flame, apparently in one body, but that rushing noise was proof that the combustion was not a continuous or a regular one. This is not an example of combustion like that of the filings I had been speaking of to which we must now return. Suppose I take a candle and examine that part of it which appears brightest to our eyes. Why? There I get those black particles which already you have seen many times evolve from the flame and which I am now about to evolve in a different way. I have arranged the glass tube so as just to dip into this luminous part as in our first experiment only higher. You see the result. In place of having the same white vapor that we had before, we now have a black vapor. There it goes as black as ink. It is certainly very different from the white vapor and when we put a light to it we shall find that it does not burn. Well, these particles, as I said before, are just the smoke of the candle. Why? It is the same carbon which exists in the candle and how comes it out of the candle wax? It evidently existed in the wax or else we should not have had it here. And now I want you to follow me in this explanation. You would hardly think that all those substances which flew around London in the form of soots and blacks are the very beauty and life of the flame and which are burned as those iron filings were burned. I want you now to follow me in this point that whenever a substance burns as the iron filings burnt in the flame of gunpowder without assuming the vapor state, whether it becomes liquid or remains solid, it becomes exceedingly luminous. What I have to say is applicable to all substances whether they burned or whether they do not burn, that they are exceedingly bright if they retain their solid form and that it is to this presence of solid particles in the candle flame that it owes its brilliancy. I have here a piece of carbon or charcoal which will burn and give us light exactly in the same manner as if it were burnt as part of a candle. The heat that is in the flame of a candle decomposes the vapor of the wax and sets free the carbon particles. They rise up heated and glowing as this now glows and then enter into the air. But the particles when burnt never pass us from a candle in the form of carbon.  I shall tell you about this later. Is it not beautiful to think that such a process is going on and that such a dirty thing as charcoal can become so incandescent? You see, it comes to this. That all bright flames contain these solid particles, all things that burn and produce solid particles either during the time they are burning as in the candle or immediately after being burnt as in the case of the gunpowder and iron filings. All these things give us this glorious and beautiful light. I have mixed potassium, chlorate and sugar. I shall touch them with a drop of sulfuric acid for the purpose of giving you an illustration of chemical action and they will instantly burn. Now, from the appearance of things you can judge for yourselves whether they produce solid matter in burning. I've given you the train of reasoning which will enable you to say whether they do or do not. For what is this bright flame but the solid particles passing off? When the particles are not separated, you get no brightness. The flame of a candle owes its brightness to the separation during combustion of these particles of carbon. I can very quickly alter that arrangement. Here, for instance, is a bright yellow flame from propane and a Bunsen burner. Supposing I add so much air to the flame as to cause all to burn before those particles are set free, I shall not have this brightness. There is plenty of carbon in the gas, but because the atmosphere can get to it and mix with it before it burns, you see how pale and blue the flame is. The difference is solely due to the solid particles not being separated before the gas is burnt. You observe that there are certain products as the result of the combustion of a candle and that of these products, one portion may be considered as charcoal or soot. That charcoal, when afterwards burnt, produces some other product and it concerns us very much now to ascertain what that other product is. This vessel captures all the products of the candle and you will presently see the vessel's walls become quite opaque. The sides of the jar become cloudy and the light begins to burn feebly. It is the products you see which make the light so dim and this is the same thing which makes the sides of the vessel so opaque. If I take a spoon that's been in cold water, wipe it dry and hold it over a candle so as not to soot it, you will find that it becomes dim just as the vessel's walls are dim. And now, just to carry your thoughts forward to the time we shall next meet, let me tell you that it is water which causes the dimness. I will show you that we can make it without difficulty assume the form of a liquid.


Falling as I am, still I miss the ground, was written by Dr. Sumerian. That's me. If you enjoy it, you can find it on the wiki and a link in the description below, and it is under a Creative Commons Share Like Attribution 3.0 license. SCP-1959 during its brief containment at Orbital Site 2001. Its current whereabouts are unknown. Again, from between the stars, living empty, crawling with purpose, a dream of a thousand worlds, like wet supple flesh prepared for carving. Denied, it screams for release for the abattoir to begin slick work. A void, a billion candles, a trillion voices, abiding silence. Release, it writhes below, more flesh for culling. Simple surrender, my love, green, blue, and beauty. Ake to catch the world, stretching forever. Refuse, the skin that was mine. Falling as I am, still I miss the ground. It is nice to know that I'm not alone out here, and I will see you all again on Tuesday.


Hey guys, it's Nate, AKA The Foot Accountant. Welcome back to the channel. Today, we are making our first video of the year on one of the most popular trading methods and short-term investing methods in FIFA Ultimate Team the past couple of years. It is called Thursday Flipping or Weekend League Flipping. Basically, what we do is we buy cards before division rivals and Weekend League rewards on Thursdays and sell them afterwards because that coin induction on the market actually makes prices rise for meta players that people want to upgrade and put into their squads. So, there's a lot of stuff to talk about in today's video. This is actually not the first Weekend League rewards, of course, but is division rivals rewards. And I still think that's gonna have some sort of an impact on the market because some people will be taking coins from rivals rewards. They've been grinding the game, getting rewards that way. They've been playing the game. I forget, like I've played just a couple. I need to play a few games tonight, man, so that I can get packs, right? People that are on the full game right now are grinding the game. This game rivals and squad battles to get these packs. Like this is how you get the packs in the game right now. So, a lot of people are gonna be playing div rivals and there's gonna be a lot of rewards that come from it. A lot of people will take the tradable packs and I don't think that's a bad option, in my opinion, at this stage in the game, taking either the coins or the tradable packs. A lot of cards are still inflated on the market. A lot of cards that are pretty cheap in terms of their rating are gonna be pretty cheap on the market and that means for me that I think, sorry, low rating, but actually kind of expensive still. You know, guys like a Tamori or maybe a guy that's like an 80 rated card that is still going for like three to five K because of SBCs. So, I might take the tradable packs or the coins. Kind of decide between the two, however many coins it is and maybe what packs you get. Kind of decide is it worth it to take a chance or not on that right there. But, these rivals rewards that come out on Thursday, I know I'm making this video early but I wanna give you guys plenty of time to prepare and there's a lot to talk about. These rewards coming out I do think will cause some prices to rise on the market like it always does. And a lot of stuff we're gonna talk about today actually pertains to team of the week number two and just very popular players that are on this game. So, I wanna talk about all the stuff that could rise for the Thursday flipping period. A lot of times we buy these players on Wednesday. So, I make this video earlier before awards so that you can actually have a thought and kind of a concept of what is going on and what some players you might want to buy would be. So, I look at this popular players page on footbin all the time. You go to the footbin homepage, players drop down and go to popular because these are the players people are searching up because they A, wanna know their price because they're either selling the card or they want to buy it and put it in their teams. So, there's a lot to talk about with players on this page but there's a couple things that I wanna mention, right? The stuff that is gonna rise after division rivals rewards is going to be meta cards from people that are upgrading their teams. They got coins, they got packs and they want to get a better player in their team, all right? So, you have to focus on meta. It's gotta be Premier League, it's gotta be Bundesliga, it's gotta be a top five nation in my opinion that's really gonna go up the most and it's just gotta be a player that's hype, right? That's why I look at this top 50 players list because if these are the players people are searching up the most on footbin, those are the players that they're wanting to buy the most or they're looking at and they're interested the most. So, as I look at this list, I see a lot of different players. You see low rated players with a very high price, low rated players with a lower price but still kind of high and then high rated meta players with a high price and all types of cards in between. The things, the cards that I think you wanna focus on on Wednesday today for rewards, to see them rise after that period would be cards that are very meta, that are decently high rated, that aren't gonna get packed that much during rewards because some people are just gonna take the coins as well and you might not see that much of like a dip in the market on some cards, you might just see them start to go up. So, and that's one of the things we're gonna talk about today, timing that buy zone but I also just wanna talk about the players that you wanna buy too. I know some of these guys are getting expensive, right? Sané, 141,000 coins, Dembele, 78K, Lucas René is not that expensive but some of these really meta players, Havertz, 130, these guys are pretty expensive, right? So Thursday flipping, the meta players that you might wanna be buying are probably ones that are gonna be pretty expensive and I'll talk about some players that are in a low range that might be very investable as well. So again, we kinda talked about the players, it's gotta be meta, it's gotta be popular. Let's talk about some, you know, market movements and like timing of those movements, right? Last year on this first rivals rewards night, there was a lot of panic selling and we saw it earlier this week even on some cards on Sunday night. Let's click into a player like Usman Dembele and look at what happened before the squad battle rewards that were played on Sunday night. Now, this might not exactly show us everything but you can see that on Sunday night, he peaked on Monday, the daily graph doesn't show the full story but Sunday night what happened was a lot of cards were sold off. This Usman Dembele was like 90 or 85,000 coins morning time on Sunday afternoon evening. He got sold off down all the way to around 70,000 coins during the squad battle rewards period and right when squad battle rewards came out, people got coins and they bought cards back. He went from 70,000 coins and later hit 92 on Monday. So what I wanna focus on is that drop off. I think there is going to be a decent amount, not a huge amount but there's going to be some sort of selling off of cards tonight on Wednesday night as we head into the rewards period on Thursday, all right? That's the one thing that I wanted you guys to focus on first because there is going to be a bit of a sell off headed into that period and that's actually gonna be when you want to time these buys. I don't know what else content's gonna come out that factors prices as well. The team of the week which we're gonna talk about factors into prices but the drop off which is before the actual rewards period is when you wanna buy because when those rewards come out, people are gonna be taking the coins, they're gonna open the couple packs that they get from rewards and stuff is going to start to rise. So that is thing number one. If you're buying a gold card that is a meta card like an Usman, like a Hernandez, like a Joe Gomez, this is also a decent time to maybe buy somebody for your team that's very high rated, like a Hazard maybe or like an Mbappe if you still haven't bought him or maybe a Pogba because yes, Friday the full game comes out and people will open packs for ones to watch but those meta players are just gonna get more and more expensive and they're gonna even explode more on the market as more and more coins are input into this game. So I would look to buy those players before rewards and I would even, you know, look for some drop off, right? When you're looking around the market, say, hey, what players do I want to buy? Again, you look for meta, you look for popular, you look for how easy they are to link in people's squads. Example Mbappe is a lot harder to link than somebody like Willian who wasn't super popular or meta but just harder to link makes him possibly not go up as much. Again, just gauging the hype around that player of course but that's kind of what you want to do with that. Looking at these buys before rewards, looking at the drops, comparing prices on full bin, watching how many percentage points a car has dropped compared to other players may give you a better opportunity of picking a card to invest in that might have, you know, more potential to rise or a higher profit percentage and make more use of your coins. That's getting pretty technical but you get the idea, right? Just watch for drop off some Wednesday night on meta cards, Brem, Bundesliga especially, maybe some La Liga, French, Brazil, of course all that stuff as well, off of this top 50 players list and just popular players that you know in foot. That is option number one. Now I want to talk about the actual rewards period as well because people are going to be opening packs. People will take the tradable packs because they're going to take the gamble and you're going to have a bit of supply come on the market. Players like this and this is a card that I have put in my mind is somebody that I want to closely watch during rewards on the Thursday division rival timeframe, right? Because this is what happened with this card on the rewards line on Sunday, right? He went down and then boomed right back up. What happened with this Tamori was during squad battle rewards, he got a lot of supply. So he went from like, I think he was actually at 7K at rewards and squad battles. He went down almost a thousand coins and then quickly shot right back up. I think that there might be a small window during rewards if you're awake for it, wherever you are in the world. For some of these low rated cards that are still very meta like Tamori, maybe even a guy like Nathan Ake or other very low rated cards that are going to get hit with supply but are also very meta. Venetius Jr. would fall in this category. Nacho Fernandez would fall in that category. Other other cards below, even Alex Tashiera possibly and Babu and Dombele. Those are types of players, Hwanghee Chan, he's 18 or coins so he might not go that much higher but low rated players like that that are still very meta, you know, 80 and below, they're gonna get packed, they're gonna have some supply, their price will probably drop for a short amount of time and then they will bounce back up as people have demand and coins to go buy those players. That's one way you can look to make coins on Thursday as well in my opinion with low rated players and one also way to make coins with these early weeks of rewards and I'm actually gonna talk about this as we have the first or second week and week and we have Team of the Week cards coming onto the game. Team of the Weeks are incredible, incredible cards to buy in the rewards period. Cards that are impacts for Team of the Week and cards from prior Team of the Weeks, right? So obviously right now when I'm recording this, Team of the Week 2 is not out yet. This is a prediction made by Foot Donk, Illegious Design and Harrison, right? I'll leave the link to this prediction in the description for credit for those guys. This is a good one and of course, there's a lot of potential with this Team of the Week this week. There's also some interesting information that any, all of us who have early access or pre-order the game will get one of these cards intradable. I'll tell you about that in a second and there's a lot of market potential with this too because a lot of cards could be going out of packs and this Team of the Week could be juiced. We'll see what EA wants to do with it and all that but link investments are also a big part of Thursday flipping and we talk about that throughout the entire year. Cards like Sun, who it links to and if you pack an informed Sun during your rewards, right? Who's gonna be linking to a player like this? Cisoco and Dambalay, maybe Harry Kane. Other regular on as a left back in the 4-5-1 formation, it would be a very popular link. So a card that's gonna get packed a lot or even some of these cards that like Chilwell is gonna be a left back in the prem, not very meta but let's say, what's a good card here? Let's say, Hamas has a right wing, very interesting. That's quite an interesting card. I don't see any cards right. Maybe Renato Sanchez, right? Let's just use this as an example, right? Renato Sanchez is a league on midfielder. He gets onto the game and he drops, his new card drops the prices of a league one midfielders because he's super hyped, super meta or whatever. Cards that are in the actual team of the week too are also good buys on rewards days. Not as much this week as maybe in future weeks because of the amount of packs that will be open because weak link rewards has a lot more of a tradeable pack supply than division rivals. But with informs like this, what you see often is in the first hour or two or three, after rewards, people pack those cards, they sell them, their prices drop and if they're meta, they bounce right back up because people buy these informs for their squads for the week in league, which I know we don't have that sort of demand now but just with, we're at this stage of the game where everybody wants coins, right? And division rivals is going to be putting coins out on the game and people are playing this game to learn it to get better at it and to develop their teams. They know that playing games will get them those coins that they need. So that's why I'm again, shouting out this team of the week. This is a prediction, of course, when the actual team of the week comes out, watch those cards in the first hour or so and you might be able to pack yourself, not pack yourself but you might be able to snag yourself a deal as one of those drops and then rises later with the influx of coins on the market. Now I mentioned this is something that's flying under the radar if you're still watching this point in the video, GGSU because this is some big information that really not a lot of people are talking about. As a part of the deadline day stuff that's going on with Ones to Watch, EA is not only, not only giving us a Ones to Watch pack, they're giving us this deadline day pack, right? Which is going to be granted before October 16th but let me talk to you about what this deadline day pack is. Starting, if you started playing FIFA by, basically if you pre-ordered FIFA and you started playing before the actual release date which it would be 12 a.m. on October 9th, you'll be granted the deadline day pack, I think that actually says Pacific so I guess you could, if you get on FIFA before this time, you'll be granted the deadline day pack which includes the Ones to Watch loan items which I think it's like a guaranteed or three or four untradable Ones to Watch loan players that will be a part of the OTW squad and also you'll be getting an untradable Team of the Week player item via a Team of the Week untradable one player pack on or before October 16th. So this should be before October 16th because this is coming out on October 9th and EA so far has been on top of their release dates in terms of the rewards that they're giving out, I believe, except for some of the attacker packs, defender packs and stuff like that, I think those are supposed to come out on the 9th as well. So all I'm saying is, if you played the game before the actual release date for the standard edition of FIFA or before this time right here, you're going to be getting an untradable player from Team of the Week two and if this is Team of the Week two, that is crazy. That is something that has never happened before and that's gonna impact the market because that gives people in FIFA, basically a lot of people, it gives them a inform in their club. Now, of course, a lot of us are gonna pack these guys in the bottom but you get a chance at Neymar, Haaland, Lewandowski, Chilwell, Hernandez, Courtois, Sanchez, Sun, if these guys are in Team of the Week tomorrow or today, that's crazy and that's why I wanted to point this out at the end of the video today and just to talk about it for a second because this is wild, like this is honestly crazy, the potential that we have here, getting an untradable once-to-watch player for pre-order in the game, a certain amount of time ahead of the actual release is one thing but giving everybody who played and got on the game before the standard edition releases a Team of the Week player from a Team of the Week that could be stacked, that's wild, all right? And I wanted to point that out and I think that's important because that's gonna affect the market in the future. So that's why I wanted to say something about it today. Also, one last minute thing, Team of the Week cards, this could be some sort of an investment as well. I don't know if you would really see these cards prices drop unless there's a player in Team of the Week two that would impact any one of these card prices from Team of the Week one. Team of the Week two cards would be a possible and decent investment as well for rewards coming tonight or coming tomorrow on Thursday with the division rivals rewards and the coins that that's gonna put on the market because people are just gonna go buy cards with the coins that they do. Yeah, so again, that's what I wanted to make this video again today was just about the division rivals rewards and I know you guys are like, it's only rivals, how is this gonna change the market? I do think it is gonna cause the market to go up. There are gonna be a few packs opened, not a ton but a few and I think that could bring some supply to the lower rated players which we could see them dip rise again and be a possible investment with that right there. Now, if you're a bit sketched on this and you're not sure, just be careful. Right coins are precious, right coins are precious especially at the beginning of the game but just kind of be careful if you're not wanting to invest I totally understand, right? Because we have a big day on Friday with all the stuff coming out regarding like the full edition more people getting on the game FIFA points and packs being open it's gonna be wild, it's gonna be crazy the whole wants to watch promo as well but I just wanted to make this video today talking about the potential for a market rise on meta players and usable players because people are getting coins from division rivals. You guys enjoyed this video, smash thumbs up on it, comment down below if you have any questions and subscribe to the channel if you're new. It's been Nate for Foot Accountant. Catch you guys later, peace out.