All right guys, welcome back to the channel. If you're new man with bobby guys, you really wanted me to react to Why jerka left Islam for Christianity as far as I know jerka is of Albanian descent and hence grew up in a Muslim family That's quite interesting for me personally because I am of Macedonian descent and I grew up in a Christian family However later in life. I decided to revert to Islam before we start the video guys If you enjoyed the content leave me a thumbs up subscribe to the channel If you haven't already and check out the links in the description box with no further ado. Let's have a look I sort of got I'm not lying The most depressed moment of my life accepted Christ Worst month of my life Close closest person my life.  They literally not with God all the blue pill liberals said drop her She's crazy. I was like, they're the exact same. They don't believe in God red pill blue pill Immediately want to went on a crusade called every red pill are and it really muddy my relationships with the dating community guys They want to have me on none of them would have me on and I tried the Christ thing and I hated Jesus Like I was punching walls in Texas all alone saying I hate Jesus does the worst month of my life lost job I mean banned from twitch everything no money the worst things that happen all alone and The first time as an adult.   I didn't sleep. I said I need to know crisis real Okay So he's talking about getting drunk taking drugs and then entering a meditative state I would say that those states are mutually exclusive because if you truly would be Meditating then you would be sober if you're completely sober you can concentrate on what is the easiness of the moment This is what meditation is about. However, when you're drunk, you're dampening your neofrontal cortex and therefore you're doing the exact opposite of Meditating you're sedated if anything you're intoxicated and therefore you're not in a meditative state Using some new agey lingo here when you're drinking alcohol, you're lowering your vibration and when you're meditating You're actually elevating your vibration sleep. I said I need to know crisis real.   I ever had that bled in tonight And I started sleeping on my beanbag.  It was like laying down and it was a dream I knew I was awake, but am I awake the girlfriend?    I was surrounded by similar people here and guess what? This is simply drug talk. They're the best dream I ever had the channeling and then Everyone they are taken from me But they left me and the feeling was you can't go to them. They don't want you so I felt very alone Then it got dark. No God the highest level of psychosis I've ever felt in my life and I said, okay, I Drowning the first ever Time I had a what's I think called sleep paralysis. Yeah, and I had no idea. Oh spiritual. I didn't handle demons No, I was more that sounds like your channel demons Well, it's not like I'm spoke out or anything. I'm yeah, this man had experiences without a spiritual framework when I was my early 20s I was experimenting with lucid dreaming sleep paralysis out of body experiences and all of those things I was really proficient at it. I trained myself to exit my body every single night I would fly over the city come back to my body, etc. However, I had no spiritual framework and then when I returned to orthodox Christianity the faith of my parents the faith of my nation If you will this is when those church fathers started warning me of demonic Possession because every single time when you leave your body your body is open to demonic Possession people believe that because they have a spiritual experience out of a sudden their spiritual Masters but you do not think that you are bodybuilder on your first day in the gym You do not think that your UFC fighter if you enter an octagon and you look around you out of a sudden What you're the UFC champion? Of course not, but this what is happening with spiritual experiences, especially the drug induced kind None of us were ready for those spiritual Experiences not me back in the day and not jerker either It is not as if you've been leveling up meditating for years training your consciousness No, you induced a psychotic state through drugs in that state You are vulnerable your vulnerable for possession and those are things that most new ages for example have no clue About you have no idea how many people from the new age then seek Exorcism or the Islamic equivalent Which is Rukia to get rid of those demons that have possessed them self-harming Psychically not like with a nice like I hate myself. I hate myself.  I know I'm asleep. This is sleep browsers wait I don't believe in sleep browsers. This is not just chemicals firing my head The love I have for my mom that I'm losing here in this dream. It's not just chemicals in my head This is spirit. I'm in the spirit world. I Swear to God. I'm not lying at the deepest point.   Let's test it. Christ is king Woke up.   Don't you understand if I didn't say I only went in the dream state the darkest state of my life just to do that. I swear to God. I'm not lying Then Nothing no love for Christ didn't care for Christ didn't come to God. There's nothing Just burst it out as an adult. Yeah in orthodox Christianity. This was called pre less Which is a false spiritual epiphany. It is a spiritual deception. You believe that you experienced something for you It was absolutely real. You think that you found God, but ultimately as you said yourself nothing crying That's it. Nothing one hour. You're doing that Jake Paul ritual that you were criticizing mark for it No, his was a breathing ritual mine was a self-harm ritual without call where you really get trashed worse Yeah, probably The point is I'm not channeling demons. I just wanted to go deep into that darkness and yo But how do you know are you a master shaman?  How would you distinguish between a demon and an angel? How would you truly know do you have any experience previously to this?  You don't believe in God No, no at the time, but I said to myself wait dreams are wish fulfillment from Freud I don't believe in chemicals in my brains causing dreams like sneak on and entertain and these Wait a minute that is spirit So let me understand this if Christ is king work and Carl Jung said if a symbol affects billions of lives The symbol is real because it's not all of our mental psyche, right? I said to myself.  They're all I don't like this and Then I started reading about well, I was reading for weeks Yeah, turning the other chick did not work in practice either so therefore no wonder that you hate them because ultimately Christians went to the crusades They went to war and they are they surely did not turn the other cheek destiny kept saying aren't you worried that your band on Twitch? You're not doing anything for this band.   But I said to doesn't I don't care and I was like very not everyone family friends What are you doing? You're not working here. You don't have a girlfriend. You don't have friends Whatever, I don't care. I don't care. I'll figure it out. I'm a nomad. Just kick it to LA Literally found out all depictions of Jesus were masculine and it's a Psyop that he's feminine and they're all buried throughout history Found out everyone on earth was a Christian and that was the default religion before all the new ones I go so deep into Christianity. Alright, so this doesn't make any sense whatsoever in Islam Yes, we do have the claim that Islam is the first religion However, how do we back up this claim first and foremost we need to dissect what Islam means Islam simply means the submission to God We are worshiping one God alone. We are submitting our will to that God This is why this claim is congruent if we go back to the first man and the Christians will agree as well that the first man Is Adam Adam submitted his will to God. There was nothing else. There was no cross around There was no other symbol around.  There was no Jesus around So Adam surely did not say Jesus is Lord during his time It is absolutely irrational and this is why Islam is the only religion that has this red thread and clearly displays What religion is religion is the relationship to God human to God Adam was a Muslim a believer someone that submitted his will to that one God There was nobody else There were no other people around and there was only this one God and he always will be he is transcendent of time He will never change. So therefore if we have this all transcendent God this timeless God and we have one human around This human doesn't even have a conceptualized religion He only has a relationship of submission to God a pure state of Islam And then the story moves on to the other prophets. We have Noah. We have abraham We have moses and we have jesus an independent of the time frame Independent of the cultural customs of the people those prophets submitted their will to God This is why we say that if you look at abraham, abraham wasn't a Jew and this factual even if you ask the Jews Abram was not a Jew. He was not practicing rabbinic or talmudic Judaism Neither was he a christian because jesus wasn't around during his time He was a man that believed in one god alone. He submitted his will to one god But enough rambling. I hope you get the point however with christianity We cannot make that point because yet again jesus wasn't around for the longest time The cross symbol wasn't around for the longest time So how will you make a congruent argument for Noah being a christian or let alone Adam the first man being a christian. This is a non-argument and I never saw christ in the dream. I saw more of like uh Really just the word crisis king and then i'm like Right on twitter and i started my crusade Yeah, and it cannot be of course that you've been learning about christ over and over and over and over again And then you took drugs and then your subconscious brought up those words, right?  That's the ultimate test, right? And i'm like, okay, tell it on youtube tell this and i was always like afraid that nick funtis was Psyop and stuff.  I know his chat's gonna call me a degener.  We start arguing on the phone. Then we're cool on the phone. Let's get on the show Immediately I said i'm walking with god. I can't stop smiling I bet this smile is gonna translate into high-level comedy. Maybe I can do 80% comedy on the show Literally sat down and looked at my refreshing. I said no i'm 29. I'm late.    He's good-looking. This is the ultimate creator.  I read the whole bible.    That's how viral I am. Okay, but now look at this David Dobrik's David Dobrik's management team reached out to me said hey We want to do a seven thousand dollar process marketing you through a million accounts We have this monopoly on the system software we made Seven thousand a week. I said no, I'm too famous.  I'll do it myself They said we're doing it for free. You're gonna remember us. I said what? Six hundred thousand viewer clip.  Don't be like Tate Start every eight big youtubers are moving to Miami just to work with me So they're like i'm gonna have one day with sneaker one day with this guy and everyone's cross-pollinating viewship with me You're telling me christ is not real All right, that's it for today's video It is an absolutely amazing example of the issues of our time Because people nowadays conflate becoming viral with the true faith with meaning fullness How does this mean anything as I said already you have hollywood stars that are rich and famous You have a Kanye west that was talking about jesus Who cares if you were a true christian and i bacon they surely was a real christian You would understand that christians are commanded to live a lowly life christians are commanded to live poorly Jesus himself if you believe in him said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle Then for a rich man to enter the kingdom of god Of course the bible proclaims as well that the love of money is the root of all evil So now you're talking about viral clicks. You're talking about money. You talk about fame How does this go hand in hand with christianity? This is a genuine question If you truly believe in jesus and jesus in the bible tells you that it's almost impossible to enter the kingdom of God as a rich man Why are you even aspiring to become rich in the first place and moreover the real question here is of course How do you know that you saw jesus in the first place matter of fact you said that you never saw jesus So, how do you know that your experience was real? How do you know that you haven't been demonically possessed if you look at certain dark magicians like elastar crawly for example He used drugs extensively cocaine alcohol opiates To become demonically possessed There was the whole name of the game take drugs get demonically possessed and channel certain information Now count one and one together If you look at christianity if you look at true christians you look at practicing monks bishops arc bishops, etc Do those people take drugs for spiritual experiences? Do those people enter into sleep paralysis lucid dreaming if the answer to this is no Which it is then the follow-up question becomes Why do you then believe that your experience was authentic and come in directly from jesus as i said already It is contradicting the statements of jesus all the followers of christ were poor But as i said it is a great example because it shows the delusion of our time people believing They will get some sort of meaning from clicks. You won't take those clicks with you You won't take the money with you when you're standing in front of your creator as muslims We believe that there is only one creator We're not dividing his power further into a holy spirit into a son. No, he is one He is unique He is the almighty all power lays with him and in him We seek refuge away from the devil in him. We seek refuge not in a lesser creature All right guys, but this is it for today's video If you liked it leave a thumbs up if you haven't subscribed already guys Please do so and if you want to support this channel by patreon for example all the links are in the description box below Thank you so much for your ongoing support guys and as always may god bless you all much love and peace


Hello everybody, this is the Reconservable status update, we will be 7 people here, so this is Valerie, I guess you know most people, but some of you don't know them, this is Valerie, Chris, Maria, Simon, Vagrant, Steven, and I'm Heuger, and we are way more people who worked on this, I guess many people are missing on these slides, so if you know a name missing, please tell us, we want to fix the slides afterwards and put credit where credit is due. Okay, what is... Okay, so I'll give a brief introduction to reproducible bills, probably most of you or almost all of you know what it is, but I just want to make sure everyone has a nice starting point. So what is the goal of reproducible bills? The first goal or the goal, the motivating goal is really to prove that binaries came from the source code that we think that they came from. And why do we want to prove this? Well, I think we all like free and open source software because we can trust what the programs that we're running have been produced by a community that we trust, we can inspect the code if we want to, we can change the code if it's doing something that we don't like. But we don't generally download the source code when we want a new program, and we especially don't download the source code when we're a user that is not also a programmer and said we download the binaries. And the binaries could have been compiled not by a friendly Debian developer but by a malicious actor who compiled it not from the source code that we think it came from, but some modified source code. Or it could have been compiled by a Debian developer who do love and trust, but their compiler is compromised and added some malicious code to the program anyway. And if you don't believe me that this happens, you can watch the beginning of any other reproducible bills talk that starts off with lots of exciting notes and scary things that can end up on your computer. So, how do we achieve this goal of reproducible bills? How do we prove that some binary that we've downloaded came from the source code that we think it came from? To do that really the only way is to take the source code and recompile it and see if it matches the binary you just downloaded. But in general you can't do that for a lot of reasons. You can recompile the source code but get a completely different binary. That was the norm of the software world for many years. I'm sure you're all aware. So, in Debian to achieve this goal of reproducible bills is generally two branches of work, or I like to think of it as two branches of work. The first is the compilation of the binary program should be deterministic and it should be random. There should be no randomness every time we compile. But it also should depend on things that change constantly like the time of the build or the host name of the machine that you're building on. So that's one area of work. The second is the build environment for any binary program or any binary package should be reproducible as well. If you have a binary you need to know some things about the build environment to reconstruct it exactly and in general we pass around binaries but we don't know a lot of important information about the build environment. So this is solved by the build info file which you've probably heard of and other work in that way. So, yeah? Yeah, so the first rebuild of Debian was done in 2013 with a rebuild name comparing whether packages were reproducible. There we were at 24% and four years later at 94%. It was pretty nice. While this looks very nice, first we are at 88% instead of we're varying the build part, but the other part actually that the tools to verify this in practice and but just on the random test side, these tools are mostly not existent yet. The workflows are not existing and the build info files are only accessible to the Debian developers. So we are not at 95% but rather at 50% or something. If you want to check the progress, there's test reproducible builds org which was previously known as reproducible. Debian that was still available under this name. There you find all these numbers, the tests, the statistics. If you haven't looked at it, there you'll find everything. So you don't necessarily need a tin full of data to care about reproducible builds. Say you can or you feel like you can trust your tool chain perhaps internally to a company perfectly. There are still some benefits to adopting reproducible builds in practice. I'll just demonstrate this through a few bugs that we've found. Here's one security bug. During the build, what it would do is generate a fairly random string that it dumps it in under user share as you get under the open ID into your secret. That's the random ID there. Every installation therefore shares the same secret even though different builds will have different secrets. So Debian was shipping the same private key to a lot of users and I'm a security expert but that's probably not very secure. That's in G-browns. Then you get to sort of other just random weird behavior. So what we were seeing is this manual page here. Sometimes it said usage off and then sometimes we compiled it. It would say should you throw it over that under user share. And this happened in a lot of band pages. What did you do with Dr. Book-Germain? Chris West-Forks found the coding question using Memcopy. I see people are already spoilering the joke. The Memcopy man page rather explicitly says the memory errors may not overlap. And the reason it turned into an O is that you can check it out. Yes, you just change Memcopy to Memmove or it goes away. Although I needed to adopt that package and upload it as Dr. Book-Germain. You also get some other silly things. Here's a package that fails to build from source, 0.46 for the time. It's because the test suite, it's a Python test suite, test suite to generate a type thing, generating test cases. And this is like a random number. It's testing the random number generator. So it's a regular bit. Dodgy as the deterministic test. So 0.46 at the end of the time, it will generate a list that doesn't contain all of the elements because it will generate a, a, a, a, a, b or something like that in its test. Details don't matter. And you could do the nice Commodore romance. And yeah, that's Python parsed. It's very fun. And we managed to find that too. We just said I'm making it usable. Cool, thank you. Okay, so now we'll talk about some updates from the last year for re-produceable builds. We had a re-produceable build summit in Berlin in December of 2016. And who attended? Not just Debbie and developers, but all of these various projects had people who attended and I probably miss them. For some reason we never made a complete list, but this is everyone that I remember. So we worked together for three days, collaborated on various, like what does re-produceable build mean for all of these various projects? And what can they get out of it? How can we work together? So one thing that we did that, that we're all proud of, I guess, is that we made a definition like what, what does it mean for a build to be re-produceable? So, well, I'll read it. A build is re-produceable if given the same source code, build environment and build instructions. Any party can re-create bit by bit identical copies of all specific artifacts. And if you go to re-produceablebuilds.org, slash doc, slash definition, all of these like italic words are defined in more detail later on in that document. So that's cool. So now we all read all those projects. You can't disagree now. And other things that we did at the re-produceable build summit include talking about build-on profiles for RPM, and we did a lot of cross distro collaboration on things like upstream package fixes and stuff like that. That's great. I guess this would be my part. So I'm maintaining, apparently, up to 29 on-boards. And then we also added an entire ARM architecture on 64. Thanks to CodePink for donating some moonshot systems. Unfortunately, they're not running Devian, but in a lot of ways it's good to test another distribution to see if there are variations introduced by running the host on Ubuntu. So that's great. So we've got 29 boards wearing away. And some of them, newer ARM boards tend to be on ARM 64 hardware. And so we're experimenting with running a few builds with ARM HF Tarrou on ARM 64 hardware. And some of you may know that it has some quirky issues. But we'll be working on sorting those out. And I think DSA is working on similar problems. And I thought to chat more about that. A lot of projects. We also added, we got some more resources from Prophet Bricks for AMD 64 and i386 testing. So it's a lot faster than last year. And we're working on more collaboration with more projects. So one example, Bernhard Wiedemann from Ubuntu's user is very active now. He sends lots of patches upstream and also has set up a test environment to build users twice. And we will share the results and present our reproducible builds org. There's also the same coming from Geeks, asteroid and leader. But there's also other new projects like Intoto, Taze has been reproducible. So there's a lot of things which happen due to the summit in Berlin and Hamburg reason one. One thing we also started in Berlin was the build testing. So the 94% figure that Holger mentioned before, that is first testing while fixing the build path. If we run builds under different build paths, then the number drops down to about 79-80%. So it accounts for about 10-12%, maybe a bit more for packages that may or may not reproduce. So there are a few reasons why you might want to build under different paths, including while to strip out part of the prefix of your build path, including privacy running under parallelism and to make it compatible across different distros as they don't have the same sort of stable build path set up and to make it easy for users to build under their home directories. So there are lots of sources for this. By far the biggest source of this is debug info generated by GCC because GCC is used as the main C compiler. It does have an option to strip out the prefix of the build path. So all you're left with is the relative path under the source root. So we've been experimenting with this for a couple of years. There have been various hurdles. One thing was called DWAT producer, which is a debugging info field that records the compiler flags passed into the compiler. And if we give dash f debug prefix map to strip out the unreproducible prefix of the path, this unreproducible value will end up in DWAT producer in the final part. So some of it will be made reproducible, but then another part of it will be made unreproducible. So we send in the patch to GCC to strip out this flag and they accepted this patch. But now we've seen in other parts, in other build systems, they will unconditionally record C flags and so on into parts of the build output. So this is interesting, you know, things around and around. Golang recently, what Golang and Rusty have made progress recently, they have similar flags. We're sort of still exploring, starting off exploring this area. It remains to be seen whether they, you know, they're sort of chasing this flag around and around, will crop up in those build systems as well. To sort of stop this from happening, we introduced this new environment called build path research map. So it's very similar to the source state Epoch environment variable that we introduced to lots of different pieces of compiler's build systems and so on. So we wrote a spec for it and we have written a patch for GCC to do this. Based on our tests, we have managed to make 1,800 packages out of about 26,000 in-devion reproducible under different build paths. So that's about 6 to maybe 7% of the total. Because it's an environment variable, a lot of people are like a little bit uneasy at doing this because usually, you know, it's not a, it's not the, you shouldn't use environment variables too much. It's usually best if you're controlling a program directly to give command life flags directly to the program. So at the moment we're getting some resistance from GCC developers about this. The discussion is still ongoing but sort of, I think this particular environment variable is acceptable because it's not about giving extra information to GCC. It's sort of about taking away existing unreproducible information that it already has from the environment. So we'll see how that goes in the next few weeks. GoLang and Rusty, with these options, they're probably going to be in the next couple of months the first reproducible compiler step we'll see ever. So GoLang, I was hoping because I'm the maintainer of Rusty as well, I was hoping that Rusty would be first but GoLang kind of jumped in and had a little bit in the last few weeks. So now we'll talk a little bit about reproducibility tools. So re-protest, we have a tool called re-protest. It was written by a GSOC student last year. The idea is you can give it an arbitrary build command. It'll run it with like varying the time, the username and things like that, sometimes even the kernel personality and then get the output and run DevScope on it. So you can use this to test your build processes. You can also run it under like virtual container, so like an S2 or something. We're working on, at the moment it's very dev-specific, it relies on auto-package test code. We've been working on reducing the diff of it at the moment with duplication code for various historical reasons and then we're going to hopefully deduplicate it and then eventually make a district vendor. So we have someone working on getting it to work on Arch Linux, which I found. So next up is DevScope. DevScope is used when we have tested some things, whether they build reproducibly and we found out they're not. So they're different and we want to find out what exactly makes them different. And DevScope is good for it because it impacts archives and converts various formats to something that would be easy to read and it generates a nice output that you can read and find out what was the cause of unreproducibility. So that has been quite a lot of work on DevScope throughout this year and for one very important aspect is that it now works much, much better on huge files with huge differences, like GCC size big files and you can now control how detailed is the output so it won't take want it up all your memory for just displaying it. You can now save that by product of DevScope with Jzone file and then tweak around how the output looks and use it again. And there has been quite a lot of speed optimizations since Lamby who did it with Vitatales and so there has been very good speed improvements like from three hours to eight minutes and so there has been also a progress bar added to DevScope so you won't get bored while you wait for these savings and there also is ways to control how the DevScope behaves on different files what files are created excluded and what's the maximum depth of container and bugs so you have now more control over how it operates we have added some debugging, login new utilities so you can see what's going on better and we have added quite a lot of new formats that it displays and I see so it now converts them all to something readable, something displayable and it shows you nice output in the format you find usable most we also added output formats so you can use whatever you like there has been for HTML output there is visual compression of images of pictures that are part of packages so you can see what exactly is different if there are differences between them so I haven't mentioned a lot of things but the debugging DevScope goes pretty fast there has been a lot of small improvements in it we have all of these tools for analyzing or testing for reproducibility so where we need to go from here is to, in Debian at least actually prove that the packages we publish are reproducible and who has been able to reproduce them we are producing building profiles now describing the build environment of all binary depths being uploaded to Debian so it's possible to see now specifically which build machine which developer built the package and the environment in which the package was built what that means and this was the topic of my talk yesterday using these building profiles it is possible now to attempt to rebuild the official Debian packages byte for byte I expect this should work 94% of the time the remaining issues we've already observed in the Jenkins test setup those packages many of them do have patches available to make them reproducible where those have not been already applied by the maintainers I believe Shiman has started to make enemies against these packages starting with the most most essential security critical or necessary packages as part of the build process getting all of those reproducible this is something that individual maintainers can also help with be extra careful now that you're building Debian packages in a clean virtual build environment that's relevant for all packages if you build them on your own machine wherever possible consider soft only uploads and this will help ensure the archive stays clean make binary uploads illegal yes we should and that leads into policy up changes upcoming yeah we have this bug to be reproducible and I've spoken here with the policy team quite a lot about what needs to be in policy to make this real so we will say the packages should be reproducible for that we need to define reproducibility which Valerie has shown that we have this definition base already so we need to put this in there we need to explain that it's a very controlled environment so we don't expect that you can rebuild packages reproducibly everywhere but in a clean csh root with the right dependency installed we need to define that there's more that also the build pass needs to be the same the build options need to be the same and we also need to mention that for reproducing it will need build info files we need to be accessible and there will be new packages and well I hope this is doable to write this into a coherent text tomorrow even assuming that we all agree we as a debbie agree that we want this in policy the debbie is really ready for this now it should be a normal bug so if your package is unreproducible it's bug but this is where we want to go 1,300 packages which are failing at the moment but we had user share doc transition in policy when there were several hundred packages still having the documentation in user doc so I would like to ask you to raise your hands if you think we should have this in policy now we somebody really against that and says we should only have a policy when there's 200 packages left for something can also disagree by writing to the bug yeah we want to do it at the beginning of the cycle and it's short and Buster will not be reproducible I would still think that there will be essential packages which are not reproducible or maybe it's just the build essential but it will still be a buggy distribution but it will be a way less buggy distribution yeah and the other thing we need to work on is really user interfaces there's a bug for app with a patch which you can try out today and add it to your app the app will warn you if you install a package which is unreproducible um that we also need to fix sbuild and pbuilder that you can rebuild packages in that way and we need to distribute thread, info, fires this is all work still needs to be done so how you can help first thing, I mean join our lovely team we will smiley face and do this and as previously mentioned our team is much bigger than this across distribution etc so if you aren't necessarily a devian but please join our team very friendly etc as a package maintainer you can check out the packages open you page and there's a rep column which is next to the auto package test c i column which will tell you very quickly whether which of your packages are really reducible or not and then you can find out more details on tests.reproducible, hyphen build and all if you have any outstanding packages etc against your packages please imply them and upload them before we NME them and then push them upstream it's probably a bit easier for the maintainer to push packages upstream there's a really established relationship there you know or be accepted in between etc if you have some spare time please have a look at our outstanding toolchain issues so obviously fixing one package is very virtuous but to be divine you can attack the toolchain issues which will affect the reproducibility status of many packages at once in particular if you have Java experience as in on the Java compiler itself there's some interesting Java.issues that there are many around there there's quite a few in tech dvips and if you want to delve into the interesting source photograph there's an interesting bug that will break if you get to take a few weeks we have two ISE channels we have Debian reproducible and reproducible builds both on OFTC the website and the mailing list please come with any questions you have any help and finally we would like to ask our sponsors so the co-infrastructure initiatives sponsors the work of some of us like Red and German Chris and myself and Ed and Mattia and our funding is only running to the end of the year we need more funding next year so if that's one part to do and profit breaks and code things for the hardware plus Debian there's more RAM 64 what's coming and thank you all for your contributions we have time for questions first shameless plug next tomorrow in my presentation reproducible builds are very important for embedded development as well especially in updates but I'll expand on that later but the question is developers both in Debian and outside of Debian where can we go to find out how to make our software reproducible what are the best practices like best GCC compiler flags to be used and that kind of stuff reproducible builds.org slash doc so thanks for your talk are there any plans for source only updates to new no but this is FTP master territory because that's sort of the only part that's missing for doing source only updates uploads you can do source only uploads today not to new not to new, that's right that would be good it would be great to to somehow relax that or work it out so then we can just go completely source only yeah, that's definitely on the radar thanks to you all for this effort I have a specific question because you said in Diffoscope you are using some visual comparison of images how is this done image magic this can do some kind of say it's same similar magic I just outlined in the pixels that are different and making for jig animation that also shows the difference maybe I need to read the docs in your bug filing experience so far have you received pushback against reproducible build patches more reproducibility in general than if so, of what type so the most general response is cobwebs and tubbleweeds so that's at 80% of the time the bugs somewhat go unlanguished until many things may have seen some of them only a few maintainers have pushed back in a big way often to do with severity and things like that but in general, no that's mostly apathy at the moment and so I mean hopefully policy change will do that and NNUs typically motivates developers if I put it that way could we maybe have a room show of hands how acceptable would it be for you as maintainer if at the time of filing the bug with a patch they would immediately upload to delayed 7 yes good idea, yes so at the time they filed the bug with a patch for reproducibility issues they would immediately upload to delayed 7 is that a good thing or a bad thing good thing we have already announced we will be doing this with delayed 15 reduce that and if you don't like us to MMU please reply to the bug MMU would you say no so you mentioned that there are 1200 packages that are now reproducible and you sort of teased that there are some interesting things with graphics and other things are there other qualities that are common among these 1200 packages that are reproducible or are there either juicy stories you can tell us about them I think the common thing is that they are harder problems we looked at them and didn't find obvious things one thing we have done is categorized the areas of reproducibility so we will go through a different scope reports and say oh yeah this is caused by a build path or this is caused by graphics which means we can then rank these issues by sort of severity of impact so if one fixed this toolchain issue versus this toolchain issue you will make 33 packages reproducible so all this categorization is done already the number of packages that are uncategorized is actually quite small so about this scope can you please clarify what the current status is because I seem to remember a previous release cycle when it was kept out of testing because it wasn't going to be security supported or too fast moving target is that still the case or is there any stable interfaces that we can rely on in stable and so on I believe it was kicked out of testing because there was a security issue with live archive or something like that it wasn't to do with oh so that's what's on the difference no it was just like there was an RC bug in some dependency so they forgot okay thank you this is a little bit less of a question than it is a comment but the I want to just mention that this reproducible build effort this is like a huge effort across all of Debbie and it's touched the toolchain so the numerous packages is in the entire infrastructure and it's just been one of the best run global changes to Debbie and that I've ever seen in the time I've worked on the project I mean I was a little slow to come around to the merits of reproducible build by itself but even before I came around to that just how well the team has worked with the rest of the project made me want to help you even if I didn't wasn't on board entirely with the goal so thank you very much for like running an amazing project across Debbie thank you so much for that it seems like that's it thank you once again listen to us and I hope you'll hear from us soon thank you


What's up everybody, Jayce here for jayspeakscasebrakes.com 2020 puny legacy football six-box half case break random teams that were ages sold out We're giving you guys 20% off a very very good price guys 32 slow to spots everybody gets around team NFL No veteran common ship all donated great price in the break compared to what boxes are selling for and again We're gonna go by group break checklist for these autographs here So Legacy there you go We'll view the checklist here like that And again before we do anything like that let's run my customer names and teams Let's roll it and we got ourselves at three and a two five times. Good luck one two three four five Jeremy down to Sanford have their five times and let's go five times here One Two three four and five chiefs down to the Cardinals Jeremy the chiefs Richard with the Jaguars Vikings Oliver with the bucks Richard That's one with your patrons Mike with the Seahawks Richard with the Ramsbury with the Panthers Colton's 49ers Juan with the bangles. There you go Juan Richard with the Saints Sean with the Texans Adam. We have the Titans Matthew with the bills Christopher with the Ravens Colton with the Packers Shannon with the Bears Colton with my Eagles Sean with the Chargers Gregory with the Colts Justin with the Falcons Charles with the Redskins Richard with the Dolphins Steelers Broncos Colton with the Judges Christopher with the Raiders Juan with the Giants Nicholas with the Lions Richard with the Cowboys Phillip with the Browns and Sanford with the Cardinals So again, if you guys want to trade I'll give you guys a quick minute I'm gonna start ripping some of these boxes, so I'll turn on Nick camp so you guys can see that I was about to say Matthew gonna trade the Bulls Then I realized obviously the Bulls all these teams are up for trade guys I mean trying to make proposal trade with everybody I'm gonna close it right now once I'm done with this box bearish for Seahawks Shannon saying you want to accept that trade Michael. Let me know it's not Closer right now. I'm feeling the bearish for the Hawks. All right All right by the time I finish this box guys, if there's no trades. I'm just closing in pretty been there for like three minutes, so Here you go. Here's a here's the schedule right there bills for Atlanta going once going twice Try one of the clothes and I'll accept that trade right there If you're good with that Matthew, I know you proposed a bunch. Let me know All right, try one of those guys. We got one trade in bills for Falcons There you go guys One trade there you go guys Yes, Matthew you did bills for Falcons better not get it right Justin had the Falcons and you had the bills, right? There you go. That was the one trade I did accept before I close the trade window. Okay. Yeah, okay. Yeah Sorry car blockers. I close it already. I Have the trade window open for like a good at least like five minutes as I can see I'm recording. I'm at seven minutes a little longer than usual, but Sorry, man. We got Harrison Smith. We got Hunter Bryant and do we have a duo? Jacob Eason and Hunter Bryant. Yes, we do.  Jesus. Stop taking them guys Colts and lions So we'll have to randomize that Colts Gregory lions Nicholas. Oh, we got Devon Bush Devon Singletary, it's trade module Justin now has the bills Another patch auto Wow in the same box How about this time you get to keep this one two out of five Jacob Eason Colts Gregory Two out of five.  I mean look the salary caps is like I guess they're always going up, right? I'm assuming especially in all sports really but I mean he is getting paid He is gonna be the highest paid polyporter back in two years, right because he's on his rookie year this He's so on his rookie year this year and next year So think about it You're getting that guy for a steal this year if there is football and the following year for a steal, you know I mean and so Really we think about it like They kind of have him on a cheap deal for the next two years So, I mean them adding that running back from LSU Clyde Edwards. I mean that's gonna help you right there, you know, I mean But you know what I mean, like it there's still like time for the chiefs to still add pieces and You know at the same time. I think you just got to be smart with your money I don't think it's wrong to pay your quarterback the most because obviously if we all know when you think of the chiefs It's Patrick Mahomes, you know, and he's he's the reason why They're really winning. Of course, it's a team sport, but you know without Mahomes They don't win that Super Bowl right or you know get to the Super Bowl and stuff like that So I don't think it's a problem paying the quarterbacks Their money, especially that he deserves it and he's gonna get the most money But I still think there is room enough to play around with people. You know what I mean? That's for sure CJ Henderson Jaguars with that one. Yeah, more and more. I'm thinking baseball is not gonna happen I think a lot of people are starting to follow the it's not safe Which I don't blame them man. If they don't feel safe, they don't feel safe and obviously the The union obviously agreed on the money specifics, right or contract with still I mean what really needs to go up on to see guys is the money towards white receivers really You know what I mean? Like there are some so talented white receivers out there. I Feel like that is becoming kind of a thing where you're finding so many different receivers in so many different places Being versatile running backs, you know, I can do it all like Christian McCaffrey. I don't know the NFL today is just so talented. It's amazing It's just it's crazy You can even say that if I was changing like ten years AJ Dylan Packers, I definitely think so too, but there are tackles and guards. I do make a lot of money. They're gonna be wrong They do You know, Brandon Brooks was eyes paid Guard in the NFL and I think you got a good good amount, too Now is it Patrick Mahomes have a money? No, but they do deserve a little bit more But they do get paid very well You got to keep those you got to keep your line and your defensive line, you know what I mean Really really fresh and really really really well. I'm taking care of but always room for more for them for sure. I think so That's why the defensive line and stuff like that gets paid Good big bucks, right? But again at the end of the day there's a lot of players and uh Positions that get factored in that we all I think we all can have a say that each spot deserves to get paid a little more Right, and yes, I'm with you too Matthew like everybody needs to get paid more than if I was cheap. Yeah It's true. I mean, I think everybody deserves to get paid more Yeah, NBA has definitely changed and NBA does does drop some money for sure and they have those like You sign a one-year deal you opt out of the second-year deal And you get paid a lot more because the salary caps just continue to increase and like the players keep on making more and more and more Which I think that's why NBA players are content with their pay and then be I mean, of course They probably want more like everybody obviously everybody's always gonna want more, but I think it is something like that you can look towards right That is another thing too. Actually. Yes, right is right It's only a 12 man roster with a couple of players, you know probably on the team itself So you could spend more money that way or an NFL. Yeah, you have to divide up between 53 players plus another 12 You know practice squad players, so I had to be like over 60 players, which is true You know, but at the end of the day guys, I mean obviously we we want to make as much money as possible I think they'll also that Even if you're Part of 53 man roster, I think you're still making at least a mill Which I'd be very happy with you know, I think most players, you know Would be very happy with that hell I think back of quarterbacks or third extreme quarterbacks that don't even like really play get paid mills if not at least close to a mill So obviously these players at the end of the day are Making their money, but yes, I know we see it as the owners are also making their money, but at the same time They did they did put up the money to purchase that team, right? Or they did invest into whatever it is to to be the owner and to And to make as much money as they can so The end of the day everybody has to make money some are gonna make more than others. That's just the way it is But I think definitely I mean I think in every field people deserve to make more money Let's just not talk about football. Let's just talk about other careers, you know, like teachers and this I mean I think teachers are very very underpaid You know, they deserve to get paid more for what they do on a day-to-day basis I mean, but Yeah, I think if I was really really pushing through they're not trying to have that stuff delayed And I think they're really really pushing that we also are in attendance for these games, which don't get me wrong I want to see my Eagles play this year. This is one of my favorite times of like the eight-year four-year turnaround window for my Eagles playing in California They play the Cardinals this year, which the in-laws now move to Arizona I got a place to stay there always watch the Cardinals play against the Eagles And then they play in Santa Clara this year to play against the 49ers So I definitely want to go to both those games if I have the opportunity, but I Just don't think it's gonna happen But hopefully they still keep this same schedule for next year and they just push it back a year not like Continue on with the rest of every single year, you know at the end of the day. I think we need to get this Obviously this virus on Contained and obviously once we get the vaccine that's definitely gonna help So that way we can all go back to our usual day-to-day life and work life And I have some family members affected big time, you know Tyler Johnson Yeah, I just can't see football out of all the sports I can see NBA still playing because like you said you brought it up Brad There's less people playing basketball 12-man roster plus a coach or two whatever it is. So less people In an area rather than having 53 players all in one place on one sideline Then you have the other 53 players on the other sideline including the refs, you know Including all the coaches or whatever it is, you know, so it's kind of more tough for me to Envision that football is going to come back although I really want him to you know So I can definitely see basketball being okay NHL kind of in the same boat as well I think they're doing a good job too But at the end of the day, I think it all just I just think it really has to come down to the players Agreeing to be part of this bubble and not breaking the rules and not going out You know really commit to doing this because I mean at the end of the day, this is their job If they're your job tells you like this has to go down and this is what needs to happen Then obviously you kind of have to do it I get I get it being a part from your family for a couple months might be rough if you can't bring them along But same time you kind of been with your family this whole time since What March? How long has it been? You know what I mean? I don't I just I just don't like that excuse of A player saying about family what about family, you know Because you've kind of been with them for much longer than you normally would have right? Your family kind of knows how the how the how the way goes you're traveling x amount of time of the year You're traveling this much time of the year and then you have these months to spend time which I think players have spent more time with their family now than they have in their whole career really You know from not traveling for the last like four months So I don't like that. I don't really like one player say that, you know I would be totally okay Being away from my family for two months because obviously I got to spend all this time with them Being safe and healthy and then obviously now trying to be Safe as well and being in that bubble that they want us to be in so nothing happens to any one of us On the team exactly, you know, I mean Jared and picnic. Oh, is that right? Well, that sucks man. Well, hopefully it's still going well for you But yeah, you know what I mean like at the same time I think you guys Understand what's going on if that was the case it has to do with public breath, you know Realize that hey, you know, we're just all trying to be safe here and whatnot Jared pink me. Yeah the dare to tear I pulled one in the first half. I don't know if there's going to be one in this half, but Falcons of this one nice Brad. Well, that's good man. That's awesome Obviously, I'm lucky and blessed enough to see my wife every day. She also works here So even a plus I guess spend more time with her although I'm always in this side and she's on that side so Don't really get to see her much. But yeah, man. I it'd be really tough for me not see my wife for Over four months, but at the same time, I think we both would agree or Understand why it's happening and just kind of got a pull through Falcon so actually this is a trade mojo, right? Matthew got that one. Um, she does the customer service and then she does the uh Sorting and shipping so she kind of does all the back-end work that no one really sees But a couple other people as well All right two more boxes guys All right guys two more boxes again coming up after this is another bowman sapphire break That's sold out straight up number seven and then we're gonna end the night with prism mega five box Two round teams each number three So anything else that's all though will break tomorrow last two boxes jubber So you do Henderson, I mean some people some people really don't brandon some people love to collect sets But as you can see now, I think it has shifted because For group breakers, it's much easier and quicker to sell you know non-heavy base cards, but There's still a lot of people that love base cards brandon. Honestly, there really is Maybe not every set of course, but I mean prism select Optic all those heavy based products bowman people love that stuff bills without them Justin there you go.  I mean, obviously the shipping is not going to be cheap If you sell it online, but no, I think people kind of already realize that Selling sets is going to be a little expensive when it comes to shipping. That's what you're trying to say, but All right, you guys last box tonic and all Nice little joe borough mini 32 out of 100 There you go. It's gonna go to the Cincinnati Bengals one Yeah, I I know we wanted to start selling some just we haven't had it. We haven't reordered In a while. We kind of just had what we used for our Hit packs and stuff like that, but I can ask and see if we can kind of Give some out or sell some out per se. I know we wanted to sell some stickers Or like throw them in customers boxes, but I don't think we've had to reorder in a while since covid so But I can see I can ask nick maybe tomorrow if he's here I have no idea did they actually cut up some of those jerseys that he wore Where he spelled it uh Spelt it differently Harrison Bryant Tyler Murray for the Cardinals and Jonathan Taylor. Look at that little added bonus Oh the mini was spelled different. Oh, wow, that's probably like a super short print or something In fact, did they spelled it that way? We should look that up. Maybe that's a big here at there. John and Taylor another one right there for the Colts I didn't realize that Yeah, bronze for Harrison Bryant going to Philip And there you go guys. That was a break. We've got to do one randomizer One one randomizer Here, oh wait, did I look closer? Yeah, I went through this right. This is all just baseball Oh, um That was an Austin Hooper. It was not numbered, but you know, we're on a penicillin. That's okay All right, so here you go guys. So all these hits will go out to the rifle teams We'll be tagged on there And again, this will be randomized here Colts Lyons, Eason and Hunter Bryant Here we got a nice Eason L5 there All right you guys, so let's see Who's gonna get this hit here? Colts Lyons And uh, it's a three and a two five times one two three four five Going to the Colts. What a break for the Colts. There you go Gregory There you go, congratulations guys, and there you go. That was a break everybody uh Coming up next is a sapphire number seven and they're going to end off tonight with a Prism mega box break. Appreciate it guys to ask these casebricks.com


headline news update. Good afternoon, folks. Steve Rhodes coming to you live from the shores of very sunny Delray Beach floor to this year. 1 p.m. Update killing. We have all the U. S. indices trading to the downside. That was off 383 points, a little over 1% S and P 1% at 42 points. NASDAQ a half or percent or 78 points. Brussels down a quarter of a percent. That's five points. The semis are 57, one and seven tenths percent. You've got gold trading out at 1,900. That's up 12 bucks. Silver is up 37 pennies. That's trading at 24, 37 lights. We crude up $4 and 58 cents. Straight out at 96, 18. Let's go take a look at our nine panel market update chart. We begin by looking at the ES mini price traded up this morning right to where we have both buyers and sellers. So there's a brand new profile. It did form. We discussed that last week. The bottom of this profile is where support is where the buyers are hanging out is at 45, 29. Now you have both buyers and sellers hanging out at 43, 69. And that's since price got up there. Looks like the sellers have a little bit of an edge if price can overcome that level. That level again is 43, 69. We should see a move to the top of its daily profile, which will line up with a descending trend line. And that move would take us to 44, 84. That is the significant area of resistance. If we take a look at the spot volatility, it's still well above its 50 day exponential moving average. So that's always a problem for the S&P 500, the ES mini, any bad news. And we see a swift decline. Again, that decline should find support at the 41, 78 level. And that's inside the ES mini. The NQ right now, no new profiles or anything for us to take a look at. We know that both these have bottom patterns, TD9, Roadsman, Dominicator signals. So in this case here, the real level for the NQ to be watching is the bottom of that daily profile. That's at the 14, 342 level. Price can get back in there. You'll be looking at 14, 653, 14, 860. In the case of the US dollar index, continues to find resistance at its TD9 count top. That was back at the 97 to 44 level, but price is above the top of a daily profile that is attempting to form. So it really has a neutral signal. Goldilocks, a brand new profile that did form on Friday, the bottom of which is 1871. The top is which is at 1924. We're trading right now at the 1899 level. Silver also finding resistance. It has a descending trim line as well as the top of its profile at the 2467 area. So that's where its battleground is. In the case of lights we include, it's breaking out. It will break out if it can close above 1983. That's its TD9 count top. Natural gas just consolidated with inside its daily profile, as is the 30 year curriculum. Folks, stay tuned for the trader's end show. But if you're off to start your Monday, have a magnificent one and thanks for joining us.