what is up guys karma medic here and welcome back to another dose today i'm going to be talking about the situational judgment section on the uk cat also your boy gone you haircut i finally got rid of that huge helmet that wolf like hair that i had on my head before you guys already know how this video is going to work i'm going to go through some general tips about situational judgment that i think are really useful and then i'm going to put myself in the corner of the screen and solve questions on camera live so that you guys can see my thought process and see the kind of things that i'm thinking about when going through these questions recently a lot of you guys have been asking for a q&a i'm sort of so you can get a better insight to who i am where i come from my background things like that so if you have any questions at all academically related personal related medical school related whatever it is feel free to leave a comment on this video or any of the videos in the future and i'm going to be doing a q&a soon also follow me on my instagram page you guys can ask me questions there not only for the q&a but about anything that you like so with that out of the way let's get right into the video so the situational judgment section is supposed to test your integrity your honesty your ability to work in teams things of that nature sort of the non-academic aspects that are required to be a doctor and to practice medicine a lot of the situational judgment section is going to revolve around medical ethics or moral dilemmas so you want to make sure that you have those things down if you don't know the four pillars of medical ethics are autonomy beneficence non-malevolence and justice let's have a quick rundown of what those things mean autonomy means that the patient is completely within their right to decide what they want to do with their body what they want to do with their course of treatment and to make decisions on their own if competent beneficence means that you want to do good and you have the intentions to do good non-malevolence is that you have the intention to not do harm you don't want to do something that could cause harm and justice is that you provide equality and treatment for all regardless of their ethnicity background color whatever it is it's equal treatment for all people now specifically for situational judgment something that is extremely extremely useful it's a document by the gmc which is the general medical council if you don't know it's a document by them called tomorrow's doctors and this document kind of outlines what it expects of doctors in the future how it expects them to act what it expects them to do and having a good read of that is going to be something that can really help in solving situational judgment questions i'm going to put a link to that document in the description down below so definitely click on that in the very least have a skim read through it you definitely want to be aware of the sort of things that they talk about in that document it covers different topics from respecting the rights of your patient not abusing your power as a doctor and a whole list of other things that are very very common and come up in situational judgment sections now keep in mind that the situational judgment section doesn't require any medical knowledge the way that these questions are marked is that you get partial points if you're close to the correct answer and then full points if you are on the correct answer so first and foremost when answering situational judgment questions you want to decide which part of the extreme spectrum you're on are you on that this is a very important consideration or this is not important at all because if you decide that then at least you can get partial marks and then you can try and figure out how extreme you want to be is this very very important or just important how they decide what the right answer is for a situational judgment question is that they pose this question to a panel of doctors and the doctors all give their opinion and whatever the most popular opinion is is what is considered right so it's not always going to be a hundred percent there you can't really say that answer a is definitively a million percent correct it's a what a majority of doctors said that they would do if they were in that situation one questioned on a panel so yeah in my opinion the best way to study for situational judgment is to do lots and lots of questions you're gonna see over and over again the same sort of themes the same sorts of questions come up so once you start to recognize those patterns over time you can figure out what the answer is really easily all right guys before we get into the questions i want to tell you a little bit about medify medify is a uk cat resource question bank that i've been using for the last little while to prepare myself for the decision making and situational judgment videos on the homepage you can see here what your performance is against other students taking medify so you know if you're performing at an average level below average or above average if you're someone who relies on doing lots and lots of practice like myself and like i always tell you guys in every one of my uk cat videos i honestly think this is really useful you can see for every section there's hundreds of questions to do and when you're done practicing you can check your performance how are you doing in each of the sections so there you can see your weaknesses you can see where you need to improve where where you should focus more of your time and you can also track your history too to see if you're keeping up with the schedule that you set for yourself if you're slacking and you probably need to do more studying after you've done a bunch of practice you can go take the mock exams so they actually have four mini mock exams for each section and then seven full mock exams this is honestly more mocks than you'll ever need to do in my opinion the mocks are really useful because it'll help you practice your timing you'll have a set amount of questions to do in a set amount of time and that'll make you really focus and harness down on your ability to do questions under pressure so yeah guys if medify is something that you might be interested in if you need that extra practice to excel you in the UK cat feel free to check out their website i'll leave a link in the description okay now having said all of that for the general tips let's jump straight into the questions okay guys so i've got my computer down here i'm gonna be reading the question and saying out loud or focusing on what i think are the most important words or the most important pieces of information and then from there i'm going to go on to tackling the questions question one a medical student satnam is working on a busy busy hospital ward an elderly patient mr anams has been discharged that morning and is getting ready to go home mr anams has difficulty walking as mr anams is leaving the hospital satnam observes him taking a pair of crutches that have been left unattended okay satnam knows that a doctor must provide authorization in order for crutches to be removed from the hospital he also knows that authorization has not been provided in this case so how important to take into account are the following considerations for satnam so the mr anams should not leave the hospital with crutches that have not been properly authorized okay so directly from the passage we know that you require proper authorization in order to take the crutches so this question is saying how important is it that we get proper authorization well i would definitely argue if first we're going to decide which half of the scale this is on this is definitely on the important side of the scale the passage directly says crutches need to be authorized this is saying how important is it that crutches are authorized so i would go for very important in this case that no one else appears to have observed mr anams taking the crutches without them being authorized this is not important at all okay so when a bad act happens when something negative happens that could jeopardize jeopardize the public's opinion of medicine or could jeopardize a patient's health whether or not someone saw that act occurring is totally unimportant and this comes up so many times over and over again note this down whether someone sees a bad act happening has no relevance to the fact that a bad act has occurred because it's still going to have the same consequences it could still affect patient health patient safety which is always number one so this is always unimportant at all make sure you write that down next question okay new paragraph before we start the new paragraph um i recently made a video where i was giving away my uk cat notes and i told you guys to send me an email there and i would send it to you i've now put a link in the descriptions that you can download them directly i think that i have some really really good notes in there for the situational judgment section so i would highly recommend checking it out i'll put a link to that download link in the description here as well and i'll link you to the video question number two dr right works in the hospital and how important is it that she is confident about the competence of the surgeon i think that that's something that's very important obviously competency of the surgeon is going to be something that's extremely important in deciding if the surgeon should do the surgery and it's going to help the patient decide if they want that specific surgeon to do the surgery on them so i would definitely say that this is on the important half of the skill whether that's very important or important if we know that the surgeon is competent this is something that's objective about them if they've had successes in the past so i'm going to go with very important how important is it that she has no evidence that the surgeon has been insensitive to women this is very important and this is also a topic that comes up over and over again i remember now from a year and a half ago when i took this exam this this theme comes up very very often if you don't have evidence of rumors if you don't have evidence of something bad having happened if allegations are being made it's very important to not believe those allegations straight away if someone is slandering someone or someone has said something crazy has happened or some person did something really bad it's really important not to take that as truth immediately you have to assess all the evidence you get you need to check for yourself you need to know for yourself the fact that she has no evidence that the surgeon has been insensitive is definitely important that telling natalie about the rumors may affect natalie's confidence in the surgeon this is also very important if we confirm to natalie like oh yeah the rumors are true or maybe they're true then that's going to affect how natalie thinks of the surgeon that's going to affect how natalie speaks about that surgeon and that could go on to influence his reputation so definitely telling natalie about the rumors i would say is not a good idea and it is of great importance in this situation okay so the third question how important is it that if she does not inform miss troper again about the risks associated with her pregnancy miss troper may decide to become pregnant for a fifth time become unwell this is clearly very important we know that she's already once not taken into account the information that the doctor gave her and she's gone against the recommendation of not getting pregnant because it puts her at an increased risk and she is now at an increased risk so we want to make sure that the patient actually understood what the doctor told them the first time if they realized the amount of harm that they could be causing themselves and we want to make sure that they don't get pregnant again as that could further increase harm to the patient always remember that first and foremost in these questions the number one thing is maintaining patient safety minimizing patient harm that's like at the very top of the pyramid of important things that you want to do in these questions and what you want to prioritize patient health and safety is absolutely number one patients or the public's view in medicine is also something quite up there that's important but number one is patient health and safety important is it that the information about the risks to miss troper's health is provided to her in a respectful and caring way again very important if you're ever giving information to a patient about the risks of their health you always want to do this in a respectful and caring way this question should be quite obvious and hopefully it is quite obvious you never want to give someone information in a disrespectful way then miss troper is provided with sufficient information for her to be able to make an informed decision about whether to become pregnant again if we go back to what i said at the beginning of this video one of the four pillars of medicine is autonomy the patient should always have the ability to make their own informed decision and this question is directly saying that we want to give her enough information for her to make her own informed decision this is 100% very important and definitely needs to happen miss troper's entitlement to be able to make her own decisions about her health and lifestyle this is basically a question about the same thing autonomy miss troper definitely needs to have autonomy and this question is saying that we will give it to her so this is very important okay next question medical students lucy and carl these are two friends or maybe they're not friends but they're two students in a classroom and that's important to take into account always know if it's two students if it's a doctor and a student if it's a lecturer and a doctor if it's a patient and a doctor you always need to remember the rules of who we're talking about here because that comes into importance in the questions so how important is it that hospital policy should be adhered to hopefully this is extremely simple and easy for you to answer obviously very important hospital policy is there for a reason rules and regulations are in place for a reason and they should always be adhered to that she does not know whether carl has been given permission to record the tutorial again i would say this is very important let's analyze why if carl does know that he has not been given permission to record and he is recording then he is knowingly and willingly doing something incorrect and he should definitely be told and that's something that needs to change if carl has no idea that he shouldn't be recording this session and he hasn't been given permission and he's recording the session again he should be told but that makes his intention very different and that is extremely important so whether carl knows that he's breaking the policies or not is going to be very important and the patient's right to confidentiality do i really need to explain this hopefully not um patient confidentiality confidentiality is of extreme extreme importance always preserve patient confidentiality unless absolutely necessary and there is a series of of times when breaking patient confidentiality is okay um but certainly this is not one of the fact that patient identifiable information is mentioned during the tutorial again obviously very important if patient identifiable information was not mentioned during the tutorial then this wouldn't be an issue because it says in the passage that you're allowed to discuss tutorials as long as the lecture grants permission and patients are not discussed so if there was no patient name then this doesn't even matter the fact that patient name is mentioned or patient identifiable material is mentioned is definitely important okay new question li and chris are working as junior doctors together really interesting scenario so the crux of this question is that it's affecting patient health and safety it says in the passage that when dealing with patients he's made some mistakes this is like the key important thing you need to take away from this passage okay his personal life and personal issues affecting patients how important is it that chris's behavior at work could increase the workload for other staff i would say this is important on the direction of important or not or not important how important this is i'm not really sure so look chris's behavior could increase the workload of other staff okay so if chris is slacking or if chris is making mistakes or if chris is not paying attention to what he's doing that's that is that is an important thing and that's going to have important consequences on other people working around him that are going to have to make up for that so i would definitely go with that least important whether it's very important or not i don't think this is the most important part of this question it is important but the the crux of this question the most important part is that patient safety is being jeopardized so i'm just going to go with important not with very important the fact that chris has made some mistakes when dealing with patients is of utmost importance it's the most important part of this whole question is that his personal life is now affecting patients affecting health and safety of patients so very important that chris has been irritable with patients again very important the patient's perspective of the doctors around them and the patient's perspective of the field of medicine as a whole is something that needs to be preserved as best as possible and if you are talking to patients in a way that does not reflect the utmost best values that doctors are supposed to hold and preserve then that is definitely very important that chris has been irritable with members of staff again this is this is also very important you don't want to be irritable with with anyone if you have personal problems if you're going through something that's totally okay and personal problems and emotions happen all the time being irritable with other members of staff is something that's not professional at all and if a patient were to see two members of staff bickering with each other or being disrespectful to each other that's definitely not going to help preserve the image of the field of medicine one sec let's move on to the second type of question that comes up in situational judgment section which is about the appropriateness of specific actions simon is a medical student how appropriate are each of the following responses by simon in this situation assume that the following responses would be said politely so okay that's also something important to consider how the responses are said because you could misinterpret the tone just from reading so keep in mind that this is being said politely dear cecilia you are part of the committee i would never deliberately exclude you in any way that is super important to say first things first you want to make it clear to cecilia that this was something that was unintentional i didn't do this on purpose to you let's try and find out what happened so very important or sorry very appropriate second thing we should look into what arrangements can be made for when people are not able to make the meetings on time okay that sounds pretty pretty good like people are going to be unable to make meetings all the time for whatever different reasons some family emergency came up my brother needed help my friend i'm feeling sick i wasn't having a good day whatever people are going to be unable to make meetings all the time so being able to set some sort of infrastructure that gets around that problem for example skyping in or being sent the meeting notes or giving your input through text is something that should definitely be done so yeah i would say this is very appropriate thing to say i'm sorry can i ask why you feel that i deliberately excluded you from the meeting the first thing i'll take away from this statement is that this isn't inappropriate this isn't a bad thing to say this isn't going to cause any problems so the bottom c and d are going to be canceled and then i'll have to decide if this is air b this definitely isn't wrong of simon to say but it might also might not be the best thing like this could cause her to just you know get mad and i'm going to go with appropriate but not ideal there's definitely better things you can say in the situation like some of the things that we saw previously i'm sorry i thought you would have known that the doors are locked at 6 15 that's a super appropriate thing to say this is like this is a pure fact you know like the doors close at 6 15 this is something that i guess you should have known but he's not saying it in that way he's saying i thought you knew or i thought you should i thought you would have known um that the doors are locked at this time so i think that's totally appropriate and yeah it's a good piece of information to say because if she didn't know that now she does and there's no reason for this whole argument that's something that she should have been aware of next question okay next question so complete the assigned personal tasks for margaret without mentioning that do not seem to be related to his development i think in this case who's it sen sen definitely wants to let margaret know that this is not what he's supposed to be doing sen is here to learn and to develop and to experience clinical things and so that's what he wants to do so if he just completes these tasks without mentioning anything then maybe margaret will think that he's okay with doing that and he won't be able to get the full learning experience that he wants so if he just does these tasks without mentioning that's i think that's an inappropriate thing to do but i wouldn't say that's like very very inappropriate this isn't going to have negative impacts on on their relationship or on patient health and safety so i would say this is inappropriate but not awful suggest to margaret examples of more clinical tasks that he could get involved with during the attachment i think this is definitely an appropriate thing to do sen wants to improve his clinical learning his clinical development and that's what he's here to do that's what he's here to learn seek advice from the academic tutor responsible for the learning attachment i think that's definitely very appropriate and i'll tell you guys why this is another one of those things that comes up over and over and over again seeking advice almost always when seeking advice this is a very appropriate thing to do asking someone for help asking someone for their input someone who is older someone who's more mature someone who is supposed to be overlooking what you're doing is always going to be appropriate if you're unsure you should be asking for help you should be seeking advice um so i definitely definitely think this is a very appropriate thing to do and if i remember correctly this is also included in my notes if you haven't downloaded them already links in the description okay new question tell the patient to inform the senior doctor how his behavior makes patients feel the next time this occurs who are we who's Cameron Cameron's a medical student so i feel like maybe it's more important that the medical staff like medical students or other doctors tell the doctor that his behavior may not be appropriate i don't think it's okay it's not a bad thing if the patients do this themselves in fact if a patient does this that it should be a real wake-up call for the doctor to reevaluate their actions and how they're behaving yeah i think i think this is appropriate so if if you're a medical student you can tell the patient like hey this might be something you might want to bring up with your doctor so that they're aware this can cause and at the beginning of a conversation where hopefully the doctor can change this kind of behavior seek advice from another senior member of staff about the senior doctor's behavior what did i just say about seeking advice seeking advice is almost always going to be a very appropriate thing to do discuss the situation with peers to find out what they would do in that situation i think this is appropriate but there's a balance and this is the reason i'm not going to put very appropriate so again discussing with someone seeking advice from someone talking to someone is almost always going to be a good thing however in this situation you don't sort of want to spread this bad information about the doctor right even though it's with peers with other medical students or maybe this is not other medical students this could be friends outside of medical school but i think the point is the same if you want to ask for advice you can maybe ask one or two friends in private ask for their opinion see if they can give you a different perspective but this is definitely something you don't want to be like spreading around so the act here of asking for advice or talking to someone else about what they would do i don't think it's bad but you also don't want to like go out and spread that information as a factor just let everyone know so i would say appropriate but not ideal but this is kind of tricky but i think b is a pretty pretty good response okay next question medical student gamma gamma gamma rays gamma jemma okay so something super super bad has occurred patient allergies some of the most important things you need to know down and be aware of it's one of the first things on a patient's medical chart there's like a huge section that says like allergies and if not you write no known adverse reactions i believe nkda or something like that but anyway this is a very very important piece of information and the fact that the doctor right wrote no when she said yes is of huge importance so before i read the question this is definitely something that the doctor needs to know and he needs to know soon okay whether this is corrected directly in front of the patient or after the patient is up for debate and i would probably say that after is maybe more appropriate um let's see what the questions are but before we start the question this definitely has to be changed inform dr mitchell once the patient has left the room that he appears to have made an error with the computer record 100 like this is the most appropriate thing to do you maybe don't want to do it while the patient is sitting there because you don't want to undermine the confidence that the patient has in the doctor but you have to let the doctor know and once the patient has left the room is a great time to do this so very appropriate change the computer record after dr mitchell and the patient have left the room to avoid dr mitchell being embarrassed okay i think this is very inappropriate i'm going to explain why although it says to avoid dr mitchell being embarrassed which like you might think is a good thing you don't want to embarrass the doctor in front of the patient which is kind of true but this is super super wrong a you're changing information when you're not authorized but anyway you're doing it without telling the doctor which has two problems a the doctor is unaware that this change has been made b it's being made without his permission and this is like definitely a huge no no you definitely need to inform the doctor in a respectful way in a nice kind way but they need to know and they need to make the change themselves ask the patient to repeat this his answer to the question that's kind of cheeky it's like it's like saving the doctor in the situation without embarrassing him it's kind of like when your best friend says something stupid when you're out and they're talking to someone who they're interested in and you kind of try and butt in to fix their response or to ask another question to change the topic i think this is a pretty similar analogy so yeah i'd say this is appropriate like you can say oh sorry i didn't hear that could you repeat it please the patient will repeat their answer the doctor will hopefully notice this time and change his input so yeah i think this is pretty appropriate but definitely talking to the doctor after is going to be the better thing to do a dental student real is when you're the team captain or the team leader of the group and another member has come to you with complaints about a third member which is totally possible this happens all the time in group projects so let's see what's going on how appropriate is it to take no action unless further complaints are received from other members of the group i would say that this is definitely inappropriate a complaint has been brought up something has been said there is a disagreement and it should definitely be addressed to dismiss this complaint and ignore it until something else happens means that more bad things could keep happening in the meantime so this is definitely inappropriate you definitely want to take action on this is this a very inappropriate thing to do i think the answer very inappropriate is reserved for when you're causing negative harm or you're causing like very big consequences to happen which i don't think this action would so i'm going to say inappropriate but not awful next question suggests to Jerome that he raises his concerns with elizabeth directly i definitely think this is a good idea and i think this is like i think this should be the first course of action to be taken the the team captain is there to sort of oversee these things and to make sure that everything is going okay but i think first things first a direct conversation between the two parties involved might be the best way to go about this next question speak to elizabeth directly to raise concerns about the time and effort she's dedicating to the group project definitely definitely appropriate first of all you're directly speaking to elizabeth you're not going through other people which is definitely good and you're directly raising concerns about the things that the other team member was concerned about so you're working towards solving the problem you're making actions you're taking initiative to solve this problem so i think it's a very appropriate thing to do i think i'm going to stop there i've currently been recording for about 40 minutes so i need to cut this down i need to make it down into an appropriate length for you guys to see i hope you enjoyed that video i hope you were able to make use of my thought process and logic as i went through these questions don't forget to ask me lots of questions for the q and a leave them in a comment down below you can leave them on my instagram page as well i hope you enjoyed it this is the fourth in the series can't believe i've made four of these now and yeah guys take care have your vision i know a lot of your exams are coming up really soon so good luck good luck good luck practice hard and i hope you guys do well i'll see you guys in the next video peace


فسألوا أهل الذكر إن كنتم لا تعلمون الحمد لله رب العالمين والصلاة والسلام على من أرسله الله ورحمة للعالمين وعلى آله وصحبه وإخوانه إلى يوم الدين أما بعد The question that was asked is What is the ruling for a sister who is on her menstruation To enter the Masjid in order to learn Quran To participate in a Halakah The ruling regarding this matter is as follows There is no evidence which is clear cut That prevents the woman who is on her menstruation to enter the Masjid That prevents the woman from entering the Masjid Since there is no evidence The original essence is She can't be stopped So we have to understand The original essence is that the woman is allowed to enter the Masjid Unless there comes an evidence that stops her from it So we have no evidence that is clear That indicates that the woman is not allowed to enter The Masjid watch is on her menstruation The second thing is that We also receive a great portion of what من المؤيدات Things that support This strong This original essence of We have evidences that support That the woman is allowed to go to the Masjid Whilst she is on her menstruation Is the hadith of عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها That which Bukhari narrated أن مؤيدة كانت سوداء لحي من العربي فعتقوها فجاءت إلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فأسلمت عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها She mentions a woman who used to be a slave of hers She freed her This woman went to the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم And she took Islam عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها خباء في المسجد أو خفش She used to live and reside inside the Masjid Here we find out We know لا يخفى عدم الإنفكاك We know that we cannot separate from this woman الحيظة من هذه المسجد She's a woman She's bound to have her menstruation It's bound to happen to her And we also know That no evidence has proven ولم ينقل عنه صلى الله عليه وسلم And there's no evidence that has been transmitted to us From the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه أمرها باعتزال المسجد وقت حيظتها That the Prophet ordered her to leave the Masjid أو ليس to be in the Masjid while she was in her menstruation So we have the evidence that we don't find there We also have the براعة الأصلية Which is that the woman is originally allowed to go to the Masjid Even though she's on her menstrual cycle Then we have no evidence proving it Thirdly we have this evidence that clearly can show That the messenger didn't order her anything She resided in the Masjid and he did not order her Some may argue and say This, for example, is وقعة عين It's a specific scenario You can't take this And try to make it a general ruling So it's وقعة عين وحديثة لا عموم لها It has no generalization We will say to those people We will say to them First of all, this issue is not only We're not only using as this As a وقعة عين in which we brought وقعة عين means It's a particular scenario that took place You can't give it a general ruling We will reply by saying First of all, we have an evidence Which is براعة الأصلية The original essence was that You had to provide us with an evidence To say that a woman is not allowed To enter the Masjid While she's on her menstruation You have to provide us an evidence That doesn't allow her You haven't done that You haven't provided anything strong Two The original essence was that She was allowed And three, now we have this evidence So it came as a help and a support With the براعة الأصلية It came as a support With the قاعدة براعة الأصلية Also, the حديث of the Masjid And it also strengthens this Which is the Masjid said That the Muslim does not become impure Does not become impure We also have Where you قوي هذا الحكمة What also strengthens that ruling Is That the people who were doing In the Masjid That were staying there Not one of them Have we ever had a narration Where the messenger Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam Ever said to them Remember While you are on your جنابة Women While you are on your menstruation Please do not come to the Masjid We don't have All of these And remember the جنابة And the حيوب Take the same ruling من باب القياس From the angle of analogy Also, we have another حديث That strengthens that the woman Can go into the Masjid While she is on her menstruation Is the حديث Of عائشة رضي الله في حجة الودع لما حاضت When it happened to her Her menstruation took place She came to the messenger سرية رسول الله She wanted to do Hajj So her menstruation started The messenger said to her If Ali عائشة do ما يفعل الحج Do what the people of Hajj are doing غيرا لا تطوفي بالبيت حتى تطهوري Except Do not do طواف On the Masjid حتى أنت حتى أنت تقرأ أنفسك So the messenger فقط تفعلها من صلى الله عليه وسلم هو أن تفعل طواف حوالي كعبة لكن He did not stop her صلى الله عليه وسلم من الدخول إلى المسجد He did not stop her from entering the Masjid للمكثي فيه To stay in it And the reason Why he stopped her From it is because The Tawaf requires وضوء And it's obligatory For a woman to be In a state of purity When she's doing a Tawaf The messenger كلالي عليه السلام Indicated that to us That Tawaf That Tawaf It requires وضوء عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها She said أن أول شيء بدأ به أي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم The first thing That the messenger started with حين قديم مكة When he came to Makkawit أنه توضأ ثم طافة بالبيت That he done Tawaf But first what did he do He done وضوء So we know that The messenger عليه السلام When he came to من حرم عليه السلام He done Tawaf Before that He done وضوء We know that The professor عليه السلام is Hajj He's Hajj عليه السلام Every action that he did محمولة العلال و جوبي في الأصل The answer is that All the actions of Hajj Is obligatory Unless A evidence shows That it's not obligatory Unless There comes an evidence That shows That it's not obligatory So the fact that The professor عليه السلام came And he done Tawaf Around the Kaaba After he purified himself Shows that the purification Is an obligation That the person has to be Upon what He has to be upon طهارة He has to be on وضوء When he goes around the Kaaba So Aisha Didn't have that Because she was On her menstruation But he said to her Do everything else The people of Hajj Are doing Except you cannot Do Tawaf Around the Kaaba Read the Quran If the people of Hajj Are reading the Quran Also read it No problem He did not prevent her From anything عليه السلام Only thing he prevented her From what The only thing he prevented Her from was Is to do Tawaf Around the Kaaba Now We know That قاعدة Is تأخير البيان To delay The clarification عن وقت الحاجة When the need was there هي لا يجوزوا في حق الرسول It is not It will never happen From the messenger That the messenger عليه السلام Will tell Aisha To not do Tawaf Around the Kaaba But he would delay telling her عليه السلام عليه السلام He would delay telling her Not to go into the Mesjid Also other Evidences show That prove That a woman Who is on her menstruation She can enter the Mesjid Is the fact When the messenger عليه السلام Took the company ads The man This man من أثال Who later Will become a companion But when he was The prophet took him As a spells of war عليه السلام And the prophet He bonded him in the Mesjid And he kept him in the pillar عليه السلام And this is before He became a Muslim We don't find That the messenger عليه السلام Asked him How his state was Was he upon Jannaba The prophet didn't ask him And as I said The Jannaba And the Haive Also When they Weft The messenger عليه السلام The food Who used to come to him Like when the Weft Came to the messenger عليه السلام When they Used to came to They would come to him In the Mesjid عليه السلام Before they all Became a Muslim He never Conditioned Any one of them He didn't Conditioned them عليه السلام Or asked them How the state was Are they pure Or they're not This shows that He's not And he's not The messenger عليه السلام Is so valuable For a disbeliever To enter the mesjid If a disbeliever Is allowed To enter the mesjid And Allah God, bless him God, bless him إلا المشرق Who are the messengers Don't bring The forbidden After this It shows you That this is a Disbeliever And he's allowed To enter the mesjid So whatever You think of A woman Who's on a Mastration Who's a believer حيث يستطيع أن يدخل المسجد أو يستطيع أن يستطيع أن يستطيع القرآن حتى يستطيع أن يستطيع القرآن و يقولون أنهم يأخذون أيضاً فلم يريد دليل، ثابت، صريح، يمنع الحائضة من دخول المسجد وقراءة القرآن ورسيطة القرآن المسجد عايشة رضي الله تعالى عنها she said كان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يذكر الله في كل حياني The messenger used to remember Allah in all of his times so that the word here is every time the messenger used to remember Allah so that every time will also mean when he was not pure and when he was upon عليه صلى الله عليه وسلم حدث الأسغر والأكبر anyone who wants to take this عموم this generalization and specify it فعليه بالدليل he has to bring an evidence any time when he wants to say he has to bring an evidence so insha'Allah we will stick to the براعة الأصلي a woman is allowed to go into the masjid while she's on her menstruation she can read the Quran she can even hold the mustahaf if she wants to it is highly recommended it is mustahab that the woman on the masjid tries to stay away from entering the masjid until she is pure she also stays away from reading the Quran or even holding the mustahaf while she's on her menstruation but if she chooses to she wants to or she has a lesson in the masjid and she has to participate in that lesson and she might miss it or she's studying the Quran or anything it is her right no one is able to stop her from it سبحانك اللهم بحمدك أشدو الله إلا إلا الله أستغفرك أتوب إلي


Hey guys welcome back to Come Again TV the only place on YouTube we're all geek culture collides I'm Shannon and today on the show we're taking a look at the Hot Wheels 2020 holiday edition of the Evil Twin So I picked this up at my local Kroger uh I know Kroger isn't uh all isn't nationwide It's mainly in the Midwest I believe I know the south the southern states have Windixie I'm not sure on the eastern or western states but here in the Midwest we have Kroger and that's where I found this Hot Wheels by Mattel the Evil Twin and I mainly I was mainly looking for Greg from Cool Classics told me about the Kroger edition of the red Batmobile 66 Batmobile so that's what I was looking for they were they had very minimal Hot Wheels cars and it was an exclusive to Kroger couldn't find it didn't want to leave empty handed so I bought the Evil Twin and there's the back here's the other vehicles in the edition we've got the Evil Twin fast gas and paradigm shift rockster torque twister and carbonator so we're going to go ahead and take a moment to appreciate this in the package and then we're going to tear it open while I give you some information on the Evil Twin the Evil Twin is a Hot Wheels casting designed by Larry Wood which debuted as part of the 2001 first editions it is based on a 1950s Cadillac with custom features such as its two namesake exposed engines chopped roof line and teeth in the grill it has been used in numerous series since its first appearance including a super treasure hunt and convention exclusive vehicle the Evil Twin was also featured in the Hot Wheels Velocity X video game in 2004 a similar vehicle was released named Too Cool also designed by Larry Wood the vehicles included in the 2020 Hot Wheels winter series are the Evil Twin fast gas and paradigm shift rockster torque twister and carbonator the information for this was obtained from Hot Wheels dot fandom dot com so there you have it guys the 2020 Christmas edition of the Hot Wheels Evil Twin hope you guys enjoyed this video make sure you tune in to come again tv for more videos just like this one and also hop on over to Cool Classics give him a subscribe and check out Greg's videos over there take care geeks if you enjoyed that video make sure you hit the subscribe button right there so you stay up to date on all things geek culture also go ahead and check out one of these two playlists on the side for more videos just like the one you just watched i'm shanon if you're coming in tv the only place on youtube where all geek culture collides take care geeks


What motivates altruists like my favorite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?  Is nihilistic envy the primary force driving her?  You know, I don't think so. I mean, there's suddenly, I think an element of nihilistic envy. But there is the issue of she believes she's doing good. She believes she's being moral. She believes she's being just.  She has a whole rationalization around this. The evil of gentrification. The fact that poor people would be crowded out of those neighborhoods in the Bronx or in Brooklyn or whatever. Where Amazon was going to put its headquarters. The fact that there were no transportation solutions. The fact that this was polluting or whatever, whatever the excuse is, right? But there were rationalizations that all come together as I'm trying to help the poor. I'm trying to help. And you know what? We don't need more jobs in New York. We've got enough jobs in New York. There's no shortage of jobs in New York. And I am the central planner trying to guide the economy to be better, to be cleaner, to be more energy efficient and to help poor people. And that's how she holds it. She doesn't hold it as and, you know, I want to destroy. I want to kill.  No, she holds it as I've been taught all my life and my responsibility is to help the needy. And the needy here is not Amazon. Amazon's rich. I don't need to help Amazon. And the needy is not the people who are going to work for Amazon because it was the headquarters. They were mostly white collar jobs. The needy are the poor people and they're going to be crowded out of the neighborhood. The real estate price is going to go up. And they're going to be traffic jams everywhere and they won't be able to get to their jobs, even if they have jobs. And it's just going to be a disaster for New York City. And plus all the tax breaks that Amazon got in order to get to 40,000 jobs, she would say, wait a minute, those taxes would go to much better causes within you. We could do something with the money. I mean, I don't want to give it to Amazon. So there are massive rationalizations that people do. And not everything is motivated by hate. It could be motivated by a wrong view of morality. That is, they get economics and they get morality wrong. And I'm not saying she's innocent because I don't think she's innocent. I think she bears moral blame for getting it all wrong because she's, she should be aware enough to see the disastrous consequences of her actions. But I don't think it's, I don't think you jump from, oh, this is anti-femal care and it looks like it's going to destroy stuff to therefore the nihilists. No, she's just an altruist. She's just, she's just a collectivist. She's just a central planner, like all of them. And the motivation is I want to do good. And good is defined in this way I describe. And almost nobody holds in their mind, I want to destroy. So that might be an emotional motivation, but very few are truly nihilistic. And I don't get the sense that what drives AOC is nihilism per se. I think she takes her altruism semi-seriously, as compared to other people who don't take it seriously at all. She takes it semi-seriously. And that's why nobody can argue against her because You don't see it as the sort of nihilistic, egalitarian strain in her. I mean, not yet. I mean, it could be that it is, it could be what drives her as envy, but I haven't seen a real envy, a real viciousness, a real... So Warren would be more that access or? I mean, again, I don't know because, you know, motivations are very hard to ascribe to people. One is I think a power luster. I think she's always been a power luster. I think she... So there's a certain nihilism there. In any power-lusting person, there's a certain nihilism because what's the power for? But I think she'd love to control people's lives. I think she enjoys being really, really smart and thinking that she can control things. No, I mean, I mean, there were certain aspects of Obama that were nihilistic, although I never thought he completely moved all the way. So this is the difference in Leonard Peacock's analysis of the D1s and the D2s. I still think most of these people are D1s.  Bernie just wants to see the world burn. I mean, that's my sense of him. And there are others that want to see the world burn. You know, they want Venezuela. Emotionally, that's really what's driving them, is seeing the world burn. But luckily, I still think that that's a minority. I don't think Silicon Valley leftists are nihilists.  And they shouldn't. And I think it's evil for them to do so because they should know better. So they're evading, right? So there's moral blame to be had. Do you believe in... Equate them with nihilists. With AOC, do you believe in the conspiracy theory that there's someone behind her and she's just sort of a puppet in a certain way? So maybe she doesn't come across to you as nihilistic, but... There's somebody behind everybody, right? So behind Trump is Steve Bannon's lackey, who's still in the White House. I forget his name, who survived all the purges and is still there at the White House. You know, advising Trump and is one of his closest advisors. Behind, you know, behind every one of these, behind Bernie Sanders, there are all the intellectuals at the universities who hold these leftist ideas. Are there people behind AOC that are helping her out and providing... Of course, of course. Stephen Miller is the guy, Steve Miller is the guy in the Trump administration. But of course there's somebody behind AOC in a sense of some intellectual guru, some financial people within the Democratic Party that are helping her to the system. I mean, that's true of any politician. These politicians are not self-contained, right? They don't just rise up with all the knowledge. They have intellectual influences. They have people who advise them. They have financial influences. But I don't think it's a conspiracy theory.  They're influenced by other people. And so I don't think there's some ominous thing. Now are some of the intellectuals who feed people this stuff nihilist? Yeah, probably. Suddenly, I'd say the nihilism in AOC is much more around, and this is generally... Okay, so yeah. So there is a nihilistic streak. But I think the nihilistic streak is much more around identity politics, much more around the race, gender, those areas I think are much more vicious and much more nasty than some of the economic issues, which I think are just plain vanilla, left of center. I mean, she says, Europe has universal healthcare. Why shouldn't we? I mean, is that nihilistic to say? Is Europe crumbling? Is Europe burning? Is the stories we're getting from Europe? Never mind. Deeper analysis. People dying in the streets? No, they're not dying in the streets. The healthcare system seems to work. And all the stories are, it's fine. It's actually supposedly... I mean, this is a mythology, but supposedly better and cheaper than ours. So she's just advocating what everybody on the left is advocating for. She just does it in a more colorful, and I think in an more effective way than everybody else. So the nihilists are more the professors at the universities. The nihilists are more the Norm Chomsky's, the... Well, they're more self-conscious, certainly, right? And then... I don't know if they have agendas more fundamentally destructive. They want to centralize control of everything because what does identity politics mean? They want to redistribute wealth in all kinds of sophisticated ways. They want to be able to monitor and control everything that you do. They're the real authoritarian threat behind it all. AOC is one more incremental step in that direction.  I think she's effective at leading in that direction. But I don't think she is. And just like Trump is, I don't think he's an all-out authoritarian, even though he's moving the country in that direction. I don't think AOC is an all-out authoritarian, nihilist who's moving us, but she is moving us in that direction. Yeah. Because if you're not for freedom, you're for more control. And therefore you're going to go in that direction because controls breed further control. I want to make sure I understand you, Ms. Rand. Why is it so... I'm still not quite sure why you're so harsh on those who would sacrifice for other people. Because I look at them. Just look at them. Because they are... They don't hesitate to sacrifice whole nations. Look at Russia. Communism is based on altruism. Look at Nazi Germany. The Nazis were more explicit than even the Russians in preaching self-sacrifice and altruism. And self-sacrifice for the state, for the folk, the people. Every dictatorship is based on altruism. Now you can't fight it by mirroring saying, it's a difference of opinion. It's a difference of life and death. So your view is that if we all became more comfortable, with our natural tendencies, that is to say selfishness, there would be less horror, less war, less Hitler. There wouldn't be any. So with the more selfish we are, the more tranquil and peaceful the world in which we live? And more benevolent toward other people, if we're rationally selfish. By that I mean a selfishness which can justify once every action rationally, not the kind of win-worship, as I call it, which consists of just indulging your own desires and urges of the moment, and there is no innate natural idea, you know. There isn't, huh? No. Well, I have a lot of innate tendencies. You think they're innate. You know what I would say? Check your premises. Check my premises? Yeah. Check the basic ideas behind any feelings that you might feel at the moment, and you'll see that your feeling comes from your premises. Good or bad, but they're held subconsciously, and they will direct your feelings, and you will think it's innate, but it isn't. How do you avoid? Let's take your thesis then and accept it. Now I'm going to be selfish. You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to be real talented and charismatic, and I'm going to develop a lot of wealth, and I'm going to have a lot of money and a lot of banks, and pretty soon nobody's going to be able to compete with me because I've already purchased all my competitors. And now I have dictatorial power over people, and I can name the price of bacon or price of oil or whatever it is, the commodity I'm selling. You know, I agree with you that you're very talented and you could accomplish a great deal and already have, but you're talking about the impossible. In a free society, nobody can become a monopolist or a dictator. The system itself, the free market, will destroy you.