Now, the people agreed then, and I believe they agree now. They voted our way on election day. They also made their voices heard during all those crucial legislative battles or spending in taxes. I think our people are disillusioned with the policies of big government. With boom and bust, with high inflation followed by higher unemployment, I think back in 1980, interest rates, 21.5%, double digit inflation for two years in a row. Productivity and the rate of growth in the gross national product dropping for the second year in a row. Almost 8 million people were unemployed and business failures were increasing. Then came the present recession, a legacy from the years of spend and spend and tax and tax and even more Americans out of work. In the six days, our economic program will have been in place one year. It has brought down interest rates. It's gotten the gross national product going in the right direction. It's given us the first real tax cut for individuals in almost 20 years and gotten inflation only a year ago, the number one economic concern of most Americans down from 12.4% in 1980 to an annual rate of 5.1% since January. Maybe it's time to ask Speaker O'Neill and the liberal leadership of his party if they really want to return to the policies that gave us a trillion dollar debt. Are they willing to pledge to the American people that when a new Congress begins next year, they won't try to take away the income tax cuts and the historic reform of indexing taxes to inflation, which probably was the biggest tax increase over the years this nation has ever had. Let me go a step further and speak a moment about one of our major concerns right now, jobs. You might have noticed the rhetoric from our liberal critics has already reached a crescendo. The trouble is that they call their compassionate solution the perfect illustration of what they call I should say their compassionate solution is the perfect illustration of why the United States is suffering from such deep rooted problems. Last week they stampeded the house with another temporary public make work program for at best 200,000 people. It would carry all the old flaws of that wasteful discredited CETA program. Most important, it's no answer for the man or woman laid off sitting around the table at nights wondering how they'll put their future back together again. We've taken a different approach. Beginning way back in February we started working on a program that would meet criteria for a real long-term solution. The Senate House Conference just acted yesterday and I called on the entire Congress to act next week to pass this legislation that will provide job training for one million people or more per year in the private sector. So my question to the speaker is which is it going to be, tip, temporary or permanent, 200,000 or one million, make work or training for lasting jobs, a political solution of spend and spend borrow and borrow or real economic opportunity for people looking to us for effective help and leadership. We can't go back to the failed policies of the past. We must stay the course toward less inflation and more jobs. But beyond issuing this challenge and citing the statistical evidence of how far we've come, we intend to remind the American people of an even more important change. In this administration, we haven't talked about the era of limitations or no growth or learning to do with less. We've talked about instead incentive, opportunity and expansion. We're emphasizing the all-important goal of capital formation as the way to withstand and renew our industrial base. We haven't tried to get government to redistribute a shrinking economic pie. We've come up with a recipe for a bigger and better pie that all Americans can share in. Now, incidentally, let me interject with all this economic talk that this morning some of the press began speculating that somehow recent attempts on some social issues, such as the place of prayer in school, the abortion problem and all, were somehow just a political gimmick and now we discarded that and we're moving on to something else. I believe this country is hungry for a spiritual revival. I also believe that what Teddy Roosevelt said once is true, the presidency is a bully pulpit and we're not going to give up on those social issues that have to do with the morals of this country and the great standards that made this country great. We'll be working for them. One other thing, we're rebuilding America's military and strategic strength. We've adopted a foreign policy that speaks openly and candidly about the failure of totalitarianism, a foreign policy that advocates the moral superiority of Western ideals like personal freedom and representative government, a foreign policy that calls for a global crusade for freedom and democracy. It's this combination of strategic strength and rhetorical candor that for the first time in years has taken American foreign policy off the defensive. Most important is strengthen the chances for a lasting peace by providing a credible base for important new peace initiatives, especially in the arms control area and in regions like the Middle East. A new political consensus, the support of the American people has made all of this possible. Our institutions are working again and this time for the people and not against them. I don't mind saying I think that's a record to be proud of. I think it's something the American people want continued and that's the message we're going to get to them this fall and now you're going to get your dessert and I'm going to sit down and have a cup of coffee with you. And wanted it to be very successful and worked for weeks on it and then stood up for an evening service in a little church out in Oklahoma and there was only one fellow out there in all the midst of the empty pews. So he went down after the opening music and said, my friends, you seem to be the only member of the congregation that showed up and I'm just a young preacher getting started. What do you think should I go through with it? And the fellow said, I'm just a little old cowpoke out here in Oklahoma but I do know this, if I loaded up a truckload of hay to took it out in the prairie and only one cow showed up, I'd feed her. Well, the young preacher took that as a cue, got back up in the pulpit and an hour and a half later said, amen. He went down and he said, my friends, you seemed to stuck with me and as I told you I'm a young preacher getting started. What did you think? And he says, well, like I told you, I don't know about that sort of thing but I do know this, if I loaded up a truckload of hay, took it out in the prairie and only one cow showed up, I sure as hell wouldn't give her the whole load. But anyway, they've given me a little time here so anyone has a question? Mr. President, before you do take questions, I would like to say thank you for sharing your time with us today. More importantly, for your significant recognition of the British press, to the best of my knowledge, you're the first President since Harry Truman who is so honest in this way and we hope that you'll find it well enough worthwhile that this will be the first. President King, thank you very much. I hope it will be too and I'm surprised that it's been so long since they had that. I would have gone back even, I happened to agree with Mr. Coolidge who said the business of America is business. Now is someone with a question? This industry is down a lot, so we just finished pulling in the executives in our ministry and I think you'd be pleased to know that the over long message that we got back in the comments was that they strongly support your position and your activities and I think that it's going to succeed and keep up their work. Well thank you very much. I don't have any answer to that. We will, we will do that. I think that what we've seen, this is probably the eighth recession since World War II and every one of them we've seen government go for the quick fix, the artificial stimulant and each time the next recession has been deeper and worse and inflation has been higher and so forth and our recovery isn't going to be as fast as those have been, but I think it's going to be lasting. There's a hand over it. We're going to have a better face with business leaders and where you get your input now, on face to face basis, are you going to do your people or are you personally talking to them in a way that will get you closer to what their problem is? Well, a little bit of all of that. Not only our people but we have a number of meetings and have had them usually, we have them in the Roosevelt room, the Roosevelt room, we now have a task force made up from the private sector of business people who are out stimulating nationwide the private initiatives, the private methods of doing things. They have acquired a data bank now of what various communities have found, partnerships between business and say their local government with regard to the problem of dropouts in school or charitable activities, whatever it might be and then they are passing this word seeing that this is distributed to all other communities so they can see what the fellow in the next town is doing and do it themselves. Over 40 states so far the governors have to work with this task force appointed their own statewide task forces. So we have that input. We have a businessman's task force similar to what we did to all the agencies and departments of government to come back and tell us how modern business practices can be put to work to make government more efficient, more economical, more effective. And so between all of those things I think we do have contact. And yesterday I met with quite a group of chief executive officers who were in here who have been working nationally on the summer jobs program and similar to in New York what they call partnership where the business community and the government got together to see how many young people could be put to work and the meeting yesterday was not only to thank them for a job well done this summer but to make sure that they were on hand to do it again next summer. The most impacted industries I applaud your efforts and Ambassador Brock's efforts to hold back the pressure of employees. I applaud your non-protectionism policy but in your capital foundation situation accelerated depreciation when can we get this when can we have to achieve this to be able to survive as a proud manufacturer in the other textile industry the proud manufacturing industry. And I'm looking desperately around here for help because I know that this is a part of our tax package. I think that Ambassador Brock I spoke with him in that place we can hold him back the pressure of the proud manufacturers to stop imports because of the globalization and non-protectionism which we agree with but in trying to do this the only way we can survive is by mechanization and we can't get them through congress and bills or anything like that so we're impacted and we're labor intense. Now I'm sorry one of my people here that don't know because I thought that this was him Mr. Feldstein. I'm not quite sure what you're asking about and certainly the tax fall was changed and accelerated depreciation is now available for all industry. Talk about something special for the textile industry. Well not textile sir that's one of the big mistakes apparently in the country we have two distinct industries and while globalization is this administration's policy which is excellent, 10-5-3-5-2 is what Plant in Germany can write off for one year and we have to still take 5 and we have third world countries and we can't mechanize until we get some parity in WEC countries. You'd like to see more incentives for capital information? Well our industry because it's so labor intense I just want to know if that is it. Well let's look into that what the situation is we'll be very happy. We'd like to have them we really would. In the face of today's economy I think we are each concerned within our own industries as to what use for C is the potential of specific taxes that would apply to industries in terms of today's economy and the need to close the budget gap. What do I see as the potential for specific taxes as they apply to industries? We recently had taxes applied to the tobacco industry in the last decade. You talked about excise taxes. Well I have to tell you having been dragged kicking and screaming into the support of reforming the tax system this time because it was the only way we could continue getting the continued reduction in government spending and all that I myself and personally opposed to any others. I believe in our tax cut program and the additional cut and the as I said that will come next July and then the indexing of the tax structure and I believe my intention is that we go further with cuts in government spending and I don't want to see any additional tax cuts as a matter of fact I look forward to a day when I mean tax increases I look forward to a day when we can cut some more. Contributions campaigns are I think there is some opposition now to political action committees and my question may be a little harder than some of the ones that have been asked here is how do you feel about PACs in general? Would you like to see them abolish that some Congress would or continue? No, as a matter of fact I notice that there was nothing wrong with political action committees when they were all over on the other side only when business began having them that they became an evil. I don't think they're an evil at all. I do think that some of the things that have been injected into electioneering by the government I'm not totally in favor of a number of those things I believe that as long as there has to be publication or exposure of who contributes and who gets the contribution then I think government is going too far in their limitations as on the individual's right to do what they want to do and that's what's led mainly to the political action committees but let's be frank about this in 1968 was that wait a minute I got the right election yes and Humphrey was running shortly thereafter Cope in a magazine article written by Al Barkin the director of Cope revealed that they had spent $68 million on the presidential campaign on behalf of one candidate of candidate Humphrey and there didn't seem to be any uproar about that as a political action committee. No I think that I think this is fine I have one more question this is a personal note if I may some years back I recall a high privilege of sharing a podium with the then governor of California in San Diego prior to a oceans industry meeting that we both attended and I had the high privilege of spending about an hour prior to that affair I came away tremendously impressed with all of your philosophies and ideas and so forth I went so far as to wage or a dollar that we would be walking you to the next house for today please consider this a belated welcome and I come to your house to collect my pocket I'm afraid I still owe you the dollar because I found out since I've been here anytime I go anyplace I'm a group I'm not allowed to pause here or there as we move on I haven't had any money in my pocket since I got to that wasn't a question let me take the one more and then we'll call it yes because I have a date with Gene Kirkpatrick certainly with the help of exporters what is government hoping to do to help U.S. manufacturers export industrial product what can government do to help in the export of more products well we have been working very hard on that very subject we recognize that with all of our feeling of anti-protectionism that free trade is still not completely fair trade in the world we've been working with our allies in Europe with Japan trying to get more fair trade to get quotas and restrictions and so forth removed we've been successful to a degree as successful as we'd like to be and we also are doing our utmost to find and stimulate for in markets I know that we've we've had people from our administration in 23 different countries simply on agricultural problems alone trying to stimulate those markets in the Caribbean initiative a large part of that is based on it's not only for national security because that is really kind of our front door about 50% of everything that we import comes through by sea that area and some of us can remember back in World War II in the early days when tankers and freighters were being sunk with inside of shore off off Florida but out of that we have come forth with the Caribbean initiative which is a plan to help develop those little island states but not in the usual way of the hand out but a hand up involving private enterprise there and in that kind of investment and to build their economies and all but we're doing our utmost to strengthen foreign trade but also to meet eyeball to eyeball with those trading partners that talk free trade but don't quite have it we're against subsidizing for export as they are doing and we'll keep on that path well I wish I Karen you look there's a lady over here and that lady hadn't raised a question yet alright just this has to be one more I know because can't keep the United Nations waiting thank you Mr. President I represent Nature magazine which is a scientific magazine possibly one of the best scientific journals in the world I wanted to ask about freedom and censorship as you may be aware the Pentagon a few weeks ago caused several papers to be rejoined of major scientific media and national security and you also know because of Dr. Keen's commitment to science and technology science and technology flourishes in an atmosphere of academia do you have any views about censorship of scientific material in this realm let me just answer that but I think it's quite a coincidence that you and Jim watched and managed to get the same same table there must have been an interesting conversation let me just say this one thing and I am as opposed to censorship as anyone but a problem that is just I think now being recognized as it should have been in years past is the extent to which we have given our potential adversary the Soviet Union American technology it has been stolen by them but also it has been given to them by us just with carelessness in our own attempt to be an open society to the point that they have benefited to our detriment by the acquiring of scientific knowledge that they never well maybe they could have eventually founded by themselves but at their pace of going they couldn't have equaled what they have today so some of these things and if here and there something goes too far we'll rectify that but I think what you heard about and read about was just an attempt to close some of these avenues where just by reason of attendance at scientific forums and seminars they have gone home with things that they have then turned to military advantage and the sophistication of their military buildup for time we thought that it was all quantity and that we were the masters of technology but their technological sophistication is a real threat to the whole peace loving world and certainly to this nation and the rapid strides that they've made so that's what's back of that not any desire in our part to close off legitimate transfer of knowledge and information now I do have to go and you're going to get dessert put apart yesterday Jean so we have a letter from you to Mr. Christy which we'll thank him for that and encourage him to help you on the Middle East initiative as soon as Jean is okay he'll come in you need your bonus question I heard from everybody Clark himself called so far as I am


Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sita Raman shall be presenting the budget on February 1st. But before that, we thought of looking back at some interesting facts about the previous budgets. RK Shanmukham Shetty had presented the first Union budget of Independent India on November 26th, 1947. In pre-independent India, the first ever budget was announced on April 7th, 1860 by James Wilson of the East India Company. The highest number of budgets have been presented by Morarji Desai, who presented a total of 10 budgets. Interestingly, he presented it twice on the occasion of his birthday, which happened to fall on February 29th, in 1964 and 1968, both of which were Libyans. In 2017, the real budget was merged with the Union budget. The only prime ministers still date to have presented our budget are Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi. Till the year 99, the Union budget was announced at 5 p.m. on the last working day of February. This was changed to 11 a.m. by former Finance Minister Jaswant Sinha. Another change took place in 2016, when the Union budget, which was always presented on the last working day of February, was changed by former Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to February 1st, 2017. In terms of word count, the longest budget speech was delivered by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, during his stint as Finance Minister in 1991. While on the other hand, the longest budget speech in terms of duration was delivered by Finance Minister Nirmala Sita Raman. And lastly, on February 1st, 2021, the first paperless budget was presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sita Raman.


I introduce Father Dave Smith, who's a priest best known for his work with at-risk young people. He's a professional wuxer. He has been nominated three times for Australian of the Year. Father Dave fights for Julian Assange, human rights and interfaith issues. Thank you for doing this, Father. Hold it up. Bring him home. That's the message. And I'm bringing my iconic image of the crucified Assange with me as ever. Something done for me by my friend Luke Cornish. I appreciate some people see this as sort of a little blasphemous using the icon of the church to depict the suffering of Julian, but we forget that before the cross was an icon of faith, it was originally a symbol of imperial power. The cross was a way of killing people you didn't like and not just disposing of them efficiently, but of killing them slowly and publicly. It was a way, you think of the, after the revolt of Spartacus, 63 BC, 6,000 men crucified along the Via Rapia, a 200 kilometer stretch.  It was their way of letting us know that we are powerful and you are nothing. Who do you think you are to speak out against us to raise your hand, to raise your voice? This is what will happen to you if you oppose the power of the empire. I mean, empire's changed, but the message stays the same. And this is what we've seen for our dear brother Julian. It's been 12 years last Thursday. Last Thursday, 12 years that Julian was first taken into custody. 12 long years, I have a 13 year old daughter. She was one year old when Julian lost his freedom. And for what? For the sake of repressing the truth that he'd already told? No, for the sake of making a public example of him. For the sake of getting the message out there that the empire is powerful and you dare not speak the power. I mean, this is the age old battle. I don't want to sound like a Marxist, but what if you said that you say, the rich do as they will, the poor do as they must. This has always been the battle. People who have the courage to speak truth to power have always paid the price. And Julian has paid the price. But for God's sake, surely he's paid enough. Surely the time has come to bring the man home for the sake of his family, for the sake of justice, for the sake of this country. God bless him. God defend him. God strengthen them in body and in spirit. Strengthen his family. Bless his partner, stellar and his lovely children. Bless his father, John and his brother Gabriel. And Lord God, bring him home. Amen.


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we are going to discuss the following question which says that evaluate 4 tan inverse of 1 by 7 minus tan inverse of 3 by 4 plus tan inverse of 16 by 63. We know that 2 tan inverse of x is equal to tan inverse of 2x upon 1 minus x square if x square is less than 1 and tan inverse of x minus tan inverse of y is equal to tan inverse of x minus y upon 1 plus x y provided x into y should be greater than minus 1. With this key idea let us proceed with the solution. We are given the expression 4 tan inverse of 1 by 7 minus tan inverse of 3 by 4 plus tan inverse of 16 by 63 which can be written as 2 into 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 minus of tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus 16 by 63 First let us solve 2 into 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7. From the key idea we know that 2 tan inverse of x is given by tan inverse of 2x upon 1 minus x square if x square is less than 1. Here we assume x as 1 by 7 and x square should be less than 1 that is 1 by 7 square which is equal to 1 by 49 should be less than 1 which is true. Therefore we can write 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 as tan inverse of 2 by 7 upon 1 minus 1 by 7 square which is equal to 2 by 7 upon 1 minus 1 by 49 that is tan inverse of 2 by 7 upon 49 minus 1 upon 49 which is equal to tan inverse of 2 by 7 upon 48 by 49 that is tan inverse of 7 into 49 by 48 is equal to tan inverse of 2 by 24. Therefore 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 will solve 7 by 24 and the expression 2 into 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 can be written as 2 tan inverse of 7 by 24 and using the same formula that is 2 tan inverse of x is equal to tan inverse of 2x upon 1 minus x square if x square is less than 1. Here we can assume x as 7 by 24 and x square should be less than 1 that is 7 by 24 square should be less than 1 which is equal to 79 upon 576 which is less than 1. Therefore 2 tan inverse of 7 by 24 can be written as tan inverse of 2 into 7 by 24 upon 1 minus 7 by 24 square which is equal to tan inverse of by 12 upon 49 upon 576 which is equal to tan inverse of 7 by 12 upon 576 minus 49 upon 576 which is equal to tan inverse of 7 by 12 upon 527 upon 576 can be written as tan inverse of 7 by 12 into 576 upon 527 is equal to tan inverse of 336 upon 527 into 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 is equal to tan inverse of 336 upon 527 all we can write 4 tan inverse of 1 by 7 is equal to tan inverse of 336 upon 527 which has solved the expression tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus tan inverse of 16 by 63 that is we have tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus tan inverse of 16 by 63 and we know that tan inverse of x minus tan inverse of y is equal to tan inverse of x minus y upon 1 plus x y provided x into y is greater than minus 1 here we can assume x as 3 by 4 and y as 16 by 63 and we know that x into y should be greater than minus 1 that is 3 by 4 into 16 by 63 that is 48 upon 252 should be greater than minus 1 which is true so we can write tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus tan inverse of 16 by 63 is equal to tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus 16 by 63 whole upon 1 plus 3 by 4 into 16 by 63 which is equal to tan inverse of 189 minus 64 upon 252 whole upon 1 plus 48 upon 252 which is further equal to tan inverse of 125 upon 252 whole upon 252 plus 48 upon 252 which is equal to tan inverse of 125 upon 300 into 252 upon 252 which is equal to tan inverse of by 12 therefore the value of the expression tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus tan inverse of 16 by 63 is equal to tan inverse of 5 by 12 now we have 2 into 2 tan inverse of 1 by 7 as tan inverse of 336 upon 527 tan inverse of 3 by 4 minus tan inverse of 16 by 63 is equal to tan inverse of 5 by 12 substituting these values in the given expression we get tan inverse of 336 upon 527 minus tan inverse of 5 by 12 and using the same formula again that is tan inverse of x minus tan inverse of y is equal to tan inverse of x minus y upon 1 plus xy provided x into y is greater than minus 1 here we can assume x of 336 upon 527 and y of 5 by 12 and we know that x into y should be greater than minus 1 that is 336 upon 527 into 5 by 12 should be greater than minus 1 which is true therefore we can write tan inverse of 336 upon 527 minus tan inverse of 5 by 12 as tan inverse of 336 upon 527 minus 5 by 12 upon 1 plus 336 upon 527 into 5 by 12 which is equal to tan inverse of 4032 minus 2635 upon 6324 divided by 6324 plus 1680 upon 6324 which is equal to tan inverse of 1397 upon 8004 therefore the value of the expression for tan inverse of 1 by 7 minus tan inverse of 3 by 4 plus tan inverse of 16 by 63 is given by tan inverse of 1397 upon 8004 which is the required answer this completes our session hope you enjoyed this session


Hello, and welcome to this episode of the security angle. I'm your host, Shelly Kramer, Managing Director and Principal Analyst here at theCUBE Research, and I'm joined by my colleague fellow analyst and member of the CUBE Collective Community, Joe Peterson, for our conversation today about consumer and enterprise gen AI cyber risks that we suspect might be keeping CISOs up at night. Joe, great to see you. Hey, great to be here today. So we're gonna dive in here on a thorny topic and one I think that's top of mind across the board for many. So according to a survey of some 300 risk and compliance pros by a company called Risk Connect, 93% of companies anticipate significant threats associated with gen AI. Okay, well, that's no surprise, right? But only 17% of those companies have trained or briefed their entire organizations on the risks of gen AI and only about 9% of those say that they're prepared to manage these risks. Okay, that's an attention getter. So why so low? Why is that number so low? Well, for one thing, I mean, it's early days. And I think that it's safe to say that there's so much of a rush to embrace AI in many ways that thinking about risks in some way is just not top of mind. And I think what organizations are doing is that they're not thinking about the potential impact of the risks that AI presents. So when you look at the risk though, gen AI is expected to reach 77.8 million users in 2024. That's a very big number. And even more impressive, that's double the adoption rate of both tablets and smartphones over a comparable period of time. So when you think about that, and then you think about adopting a wait and see attitude with these adoption numbers, it's a risky strategy or it's actually probably no strategy at all. A similar survey from ISACA that was published in the fall of 2023 surveyed more than 2,300 pros who work in audit, risk security, data privacy and IT governance. Their data showed that only 10% of companies had a comprehensive gen AI policy in place. And more than a quarter of the respondents said they didn't have any plans to develop one. Okay, that keeps me up at night. So all of this leads us to our conversation today, which is a focus on what we're seeing as the top consumer in enterprise gen AI cyber risks. We've narrowed that down to what we think the foremost pressing risks are, and these include model training and attack surface vulnerabilities, data privacy, corporate IP exposure, ooh, that one gives me, that's one that keeps me up at night, gen AI jail breaks and back doors. So we're gonna kick this off.  Let's hear it. I am, and but before I go there to your point, Shelly, even the companies that are developing policies don't really have a good way to enforce them. So it's great that they have a policy in place. Right. But behind closed doors, what I'm hearing CISO say is, well, we can enforce this part of it here, but we can enforce that part of it there, which is kind of scary, right? It's very scary. They're not doing that publicly, but that's what they're saying in private. So, but onto our top four things, and you're right, I'm gonna tackle the first two. The first is model training attack surface vulnerabilities. So collection of data happens in many ways and through many means, right? This lack of clean data can be problematic. Gen AI also stores this data for unspecified periods of time in often insecure environments. So there's lots of problems right there that I layered on top of that, right? This whole combination can lead to access and manipulation of data as well as potential bias. So we're dealing with dirty data maybe, right? So that's a problem, right? That's problem one. Data privacy is sort of the next on our hit list. And the framework around data collection is thin. And the rules around the type of data that's input into generative models is thinner sometimes. So we got the skinny going on there, right? Without an enforceable data exfiltration policy, you're kind of in a quagmire. And there's potential for models to learn and replicate what is private corporate information in an output. So what is that stuff? It spells breach waiting to happen. It is a breach waiting to happen. To your point about control and even seeing what's happening, I remember, gosh, it was about this time last year. Actually, maybe a little bit later in the year, Gen AI and Microsoft or Cheshire BT and Microsoft could just announce an alliance and all of that sort of thing. And we had people within our organization at the time who were all in on AI and who were all of a sudden using AI to generate articles and things like that. And I remember saying, gosh, we need to have some structure here. We need to have some rules in place. And we can't just, I would see content that was produced by someone on our team who really typically wasn't a great writer. And then all of a sudden his work required tons of editing. And then all of a sudden, I'd see these articles that were coming out that were written using Cheshire BT that didn't sound like him, that there was no way I could fact check and all that sort of thing. So it is a very real problem. And by the way, that organization that I led at that time was an organization of 30 people, right? So imagine if you have 3,000 or 30,000 employees and what a big problem this becomes, right? So, and then that leads us to the third risk on our list which is corporate IP exposure. So take my example of you've got people within your organization who are all in on using Gen AI, I think that's great. But when you don't have guardrails and you don't have policies and you don't have monitoring and auditing in place and all of these guardrails, then you have a very real chance of exposing your corporate IP without, it's generally speaking an unintentional thing. But when people might be loading proprietary corporate data into something like Cheshire BT or some other Gen AI platform and it's like they're not thinking about risks. They're not understanding what the risks are. And this kind of error intentional or otherwise can lead to the exposure of IP, API keys and other corporate information that is incredibly dangerous. So I think that when we talk about we're not just, we're not, our goal in having these conversations isn't to inspire fear, right? I mean, we want people to be using Gen AI. We want people to be benefiting from this technology, but we also live among CSOs and security professionals and watch what's happening from a threat actor standpoint. So we know that these are things that people really need to pay attention to. The other thing that I think is incredibly important, the fourth on our list today is Gen AI jail breaks and back doors. And you know, Houston, we have a problem. Gen AI guardrails are meant to protect organizations until they don't. And so how and why are these AI guardrails that some organizations may have in place being circumvented? The easy answer is because they can be. And I think that I ran across some information from Carnegie Mellon University researchers from Carnegie Mellon and the Center for AI Security, AI Safety announced in the summer of 2023 that they had found a way to successfully overcome guardrails.  So for folks hoping to deploy LLMs in public facing applications, it's important to know that security researchers realize that attackers could get these models to do whatever they wanted, including engaging in racist or sexist dialogue or equally as threatening writing malware and using LLMs for malicious purposes. So, and it turns out that these researchers found that fooling an LLM is really not all that hard. So, and the other part of this is that online forums and hacker tools can be easily accessed to learn tips and tricks to circumvent established gen AI guardrails. And these are often, as I said, called jail breaks, attackers sometimes generate deceptive content, sometimes they launch targeted attacks. And really don't take my word for it, just Google it. Google how to circumvent AI guardrails and you'll see all kinds of tips and information. Does that make you nervous? Good, it should because it's happening. So these things are all really, really things that we think are important to pay attention to. And now we're gonna talk a little bit about some best practices to kind of work your way through this. Yeah, you made a really good point. We want people to be aware of what's going on, but we also wanna provide some tips and tricks that we're seeing organizations use. And one of the things that I think about, especially if I go into a smaller company that doesn't have a big budget for security, I tell them to spend their money on end users, right?  And one of our best practices is train your employees. Have a conversation with them about what it is you're trying to protect and why it's important. Because at the end of the day, you're trying to protect their job. That's really a shortcut way to say, if the company's not viable, you're not gonna have a job, right? So if our corporate secrets leak out, for example, it matters to you. And here's why it matters to you and draw that line. And build an AI governance plan. If you don't already have one, you need one, right? Something, a can that we've been kicking down the road in IT for a long time is classifying corporate data. Now, the bigger organizations do a great job of it, but the smaller shops are busy keeping the lights on and they quite frankly haven't had the time. So there's tools out there that you can buy that will help you classify data. If you don't have the time to do it, you don't have a big staff, there's tools that can help you do that, right? So it's really important to know, stack-rank the data and know what the really important stuff is and where you keep it. And then understand how your data governance and security tools work best together. Yeah, yeah, super. And again, just like we talked about four risks to be concerned about, these are four pretty easy best practices that aren't that hard to embrace. So we're gonna dive in a little bit to some of these and give you some deeper thoughts on that. And I'm gonna start with building AI governance into your organization. And to me, this is very similar to Joe. I know you've had these conversations for the last decade plus. I certainly have had them about security and making security foundational in every single thing that you do. Well, I think that AI, building AI governance is also a foundational thing these days. And so what is AI governance? It's a process of building technical guardrails around how the organization deploys and engages with AI tools. I like what the artificial intelligence governing and governance and auditing program. It's AIGA program. It's an undertaking by the University of Turku, which and they've developed this around AI governance with the EU's AI regulations in mind. Their goal is to study and develop governance models for AI and for services and the business ecosystem that's emerging around responsible AI. I'll include a link to that organization and our show notes because it's definitely worth checking out what they're doing. But their AI governance framework includes consists of three layers, environmental, organizational and the AI system itself. And each layer kind of contains a set of governance components and processes linked to the AI systems system lifecycle. So again, I'll include a link so that you could check out more because they have a lot of resources that they've developed around this AI systems lifecycle. So when you're thinking about building an AI governance framework, I think that it's important to start with really embracing the fact that this is a strategic undertaking and it starts right where you would expect with the assessment of your organization's unique needs. Every company is different. Every company's at a different place in terms of awareness, adoption, use, understanding, all of those sorts of things. So assessing your organization's unique needs, including the ability to safely handle sensitive data responsibly is really important. Other key parts of this exercise and strategy included having an understanding of both ethical and legal standards and establishing your own frameworks on those fronts. And then when it comes to AI, understanding that transparency is incredibly important as our algorithm regulation and accountability within your organization and team. And then when I say accountability, I'm also going to mention auditability and that's key. So making sure that you have a process in place for engaging in ongoing monitoring and adaptation. And we've been talking about this as it relates to digital transformation also for a decade plus. And I think that strategically these days, this applies to so many things that we do, but it's monitor, measure, tweak, right? It's monitoring what's happening and adapting as needed. And it's kind of a universal formula and it applies as much to AI governance as anything else. And I think that when we think about applying this at the code level, effective AI governance helps organizations along the way with observing, auditing, managing and limiting the data that's going in and out of AI systems. And this AI governance is truly business table stakes today. So I know you agree. I do agree. I know you agree. And you touched on this earlier, employee training is so, so, so important and there are many lessons to be learned from shadow IT which still takes place all the time. But over the last decade, again, security teams have tried very hard to rein in shadow IT. Figures from Gartner revealed that 41% of employees acquired, modified or created technology outside of IT's visibility in 2022. And in 2023, shadow IT and project management survey from Captera found that 57% of small to mid-sized businesses have had high impact shadow IT efforts, okay? So those are big numbers. I mean, 57% having high shadow IT issues, that's a big deal. So Gen AI is a different animal but it's taking off way more rapidly than shadow IT did. And it is, I'm gonna go back to my story about managing my team a year ago. And there were people who were very cautious about thinking about using Gen AI and adopting it. And then we had people on our team who were just rushing in and they didn't, they were glad that there was not a policy and guide rails and rules and regulations in place because they just wanted to use it. They wanted to use it and play and learn and experiment. And all those things are great and they're commendable but they're also scary as hell. And so they had those things that rushed to innovate and learn, experiment with new technology should not be stifled within an organization but you've got to have rules and employee education in place and they really need to understand, employees need to understand the types of the risk that's possible and they need to understand the differences between a Gen AI model and a proprietary AI model. And again, while these things are fun to use and experiment they're also really super easy to misuse and there are huge repercussions of adding sensitive data to a Gen AI model. I mean, it could have lasting business consequences. So when you think about limiting things like limiting access and implementing strict protocols as it relates to the management of sensitive data really needs to be a very high priority initiative and it needs to be something though that you don't just do. You do and you talk to your people about it and why it's important. And by the way, you don't just have that conversation once. You have that conversation over and over and over again. Yeah, you do. And classifying data really helps in defining who gets access to what. Yeah. Right? That's the other side of it, right? And it helps to minimize your risk profile and accidental data exposure. So it's you proactively locking that data down, right? And part of the way you lock it down is by classifying it. We talked about that a little bit earlier but the classification is super important. It's one of those things that takes a lot of time and a lot of effort and it's a can that's been kicked down the road in some places and some organizations just because they've had other more mission critical priorities. But what's happening now with AI is it's forcing that data classification conversation to come back up. Yeah. Right? Yeah. And so that's what we're seeing. And we had talked about something else proactive a little bit earlier that you can do. And it's the idea that policies and education are great but data governance and security tools are the way that organizations can enforce adherence. So tools like DLP, threat intelligence, cloud native application protection platform, CNEP, extended detection and response, XDR. Now that can be XDR, it can be MDR or whereas a managed XDR, right? If that helps you out more but have it in place. These are tools that help prevent unwanted exfiltration and I don't know if you've seen some of these in action but the user, if you're starting to send something that's risky, the user actually gets a note that pops up and it says.  Are you sure you want to send this, right? Yeah. So it kind of is, and you're notified in IT too if you haven't seen this in action it's kind of cool but the idea. That's the part of this that I really like. It's not so much the notification that goes to the employee that says, are you sure you want to do this? It's the notification that goes to IT that says, hey, watch what she's doing. Hey, Joe's on the loose. Careful, she's on the loose.  Well, shut her down. So Shelly, I know that you've got some things to share with us about tools and the whole tool roundup around this so. You know, and one thing I'll just get back up though and say real quickly is that, you know, we have talked about all of these tools. We've talked about DLP. We've talked about CNAP.  I think the important thing is that this is not something that you necessarily need to build from the ground up. You don't need to recreate a wheel here. There are some amazing tools, some amazing vendors out there who have already done the hard work and created a lot of these solutions that are very easy for you to use and rely on. There's also a managed security services, you know, so that if you don't have the talent in the team to do it yourself and the expertise to do it yourself. So I really encourage you to not walk away from conversations like this feeling overwhelmed but know that there are some very real solutions out there. And I'll be sharing link in the show notes of this episode, some of the prior episodes that we've done where we've taken a dive into some of these tools and maybe that'll help you along the way. So now we're gonna talk a little bit about, you know, kind of a quick roundup of some folks that we think are doing some interesting things. You know, the global AI cybersecurity, cybersecurity market is not small. It's expected to reach about 38.2 billion by 2025. And it is predicted that 50% of organizations will actively rely on AI-driven cybersecurity tools by 2023, which is now. 88% of cybersecurity pros believe that AI will be essential for performing security tasks more efficiently. And 71% of those survey thinks that it could be used for conducting cyber attacks within three years. And I'm laughing because it's already being used to conduct cybersecurity attacks. So anyway, and we've talked about this on our show before. So the thing about AI is that it's terribly exciting and there are so many great things that we can do with that. But in addition to the great things that we can do and things to be excited about, cybersecurity threat actors, nefarious people are learning and using AI tools and at a very rapid pace. So we need to be out in front of those. So here are some cybersecurity solutions that we think have an interesting take on securing gen AI. I'm gonna start with Google Clouds. Google Cloud and they have a product called Security AI Workbench. It's built with Duet AI and Google Cloud and the Security AI Workbench offers AI powered capabilities that help assess, summarize and prioritize threat data across both proprietary and public sources. Pretty cool. Microsoft, not surprisingly, Microsoft Security Copilot is a tool that's integrated with Microsoft's security ecosystem, has interoperability with Microsoft Sentinel, Defender and Intune. Copilot leverages AI to enhance threat intelligence and it also helps automate incident response, which is very key these days. CrowdStrike's Charlotte AI is interesting. It has NLP capabilities on the Falcon platform. We've talked about this before and it allows customers to ask, answer and act. CrowdStrike estimates that the tool allows customers to complete security tasks a whopping 75% faster, absorb thousands of pages of threat intelligence in a matter of seconds, reduce the analyst workload, improve efficiency, write technical queries 57% faster and this is even if you're new to cybersecurity. So those are some pretty significant assists here with these tools. And I wanted to mention one more company that I'm paying attention to, Joe. This company's in your part of the world or close anyway, they're in Raleigh. It's company called HowSo. They were formerly called Dive Plane and what I like about what they're doing is they're all about AI that you can trust, audit and explain. And the HowSo engine is an open source ML engine that provides exact attribution back to input data, which allows for full traceability and accountability of influence, which is really the foundation of everything that HowSo builds. And they have something called a HowSo synthesizer and that is data that's digitally generated and behaves like you would expect it to behave without any privacy or compliance risks built on the HowSo engine. So synthetic data that you can trust, there are lots of use cases for this, for what it is that HowSo is doing. I mentioned they're located in Raleigh, I think, which is kind of the heart of healthcare, the healthcare world. And so there's a lot of use cases in the healthcare space when you think about organizations and how they need to be able to securely both analyze and share data, both internally and with other agencies, think doctors, hospitals, the pharma, all of that sort of thing. So anyway, I'm really impressed by what HowSo is doing. I love their commitment to trust, audit, explain and I think we're gonna be hearing a lot about them in the future. They sound cool, I need to check them out. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, so the three that I'm gonna highlight are First Cisco Security Club and this is the marriage of Gen AI into Cisco Security Club with the goal of improving threat detection, making policy management easier to administer and simplifying security ops with the help of advanced AI analytics. My next one is security scorecard. So this tool utilizes chat GPT-4 to deliver detailed security ratings that provide a unique understanding of your overall security posture. The tools use NLP queries and customers receive actionable insights. So that sounds pretty cool. And my last one is synthesis humans. So these guys create perfectly labeled images and video for MI models. So this is data generation and labeling at scale and teams can use the information for realistic security simulation or even cyber security training. Wow, that's really cool. I think that there are some and you know what, I think that these seven companies have some great solutions. I will also say that I think that, you know this is kind of the tip of the iceberg. There's some really innovative things that are happening in this space. I think that, you know as we were talking about this as you were talking about this I was thinking about what IBM is doing with its Watson X governance. We should maybe even do a whole episode on that because they're doing some really, really interesting things there and I think that they are very much a part of the AI security conversation and equation. So note to self, we're going to tackle IBM here in one of our episodes soon. Well, Joe, my friend with that I think we're going to wrap this episode of the security angle and it has been an interesting dive into the consumer and enterprise gen AI cyber risks that we know that keep us up at night. And we know that these certainly are keeping CISOs up at night but thank you our viewing and listening audience for being along with us on this journey today and we will see you again right here next week.


I want to speak today on the title, Dead Dog Mentality. I want to read the verse in just a second. But we want to continue talking about our faith and our position in Jesus Christ. When I was born, I was born into a family, and I was the first born mom and dad. I didn't choose to be born in this family, even though if I would have the choice, I probably would still choose that family, but it wasn't my choice. I was born in a family as an infant. I was born in a family without any abilities to do anything at that moment, but in that family, I right away occupied a position in the heart of my father and in the heart of my mother. And this position was called a son. I was an infant, but also a son. With years, I grew older, I learned how to walk, I learned how to talk, I learned how to write, but I still maintained the same position, a son. Then time came when I became a lot older, I graduated from school, I became a driver, I learned how to drive. I got a Facebook account. I still maintained a position in their heart as a son. I forwarded until I started to preach and I started to minister in the church. I still maintained a position, a son. I got married and have my own family now, have my own house and have my own vehicle, but I still am a son. I will have children and one day I will be old and one day I will be toward the end of my life and I will still have the same position as a son. My position in the family never changed. My condition always does. Here's pictures of when I was a kid. See, I went from this to this and to this. But no matter what condition in life I had, whether it was crazy, I had long hair, short hair, my physical appearance, I still had the same position. And this position that I have in the heart of my parents is nothing to do with what I did. It has nothing to do even with what I do. It has to do with my birth in the family. Same thing happens spiritually. Because you get saved as a children of God, you acquire a position in the heart of God that you can be in diapers today conditionally. You can be conditionally in the place where you're still maybe struggling or still not there where you're supposed to be. In the heart of God you are His child. He doesn't look at you through your diapers.  He looks at you through the love and the affection He owes to you. Not because of what you've done, but because of your birth into His family. You know, my father and my mother, they love me. My father and my mother, you know, they have a special place in their heart. When I think of that place, it has nothing to do with my abilities. It all has to do with my birth. And that helps me to understand. When I look at God, and for example if, you know, I didn't have maybe a day of prayer or I didn't read the Bible and my thought wasn't into it, or in some ways I don't measure up. I always reflect at the fact that when I was an infant, my parents didn't throw me on the streets because I couldn't vacuum the house. I always remind myself that when I was an infant, and because I cried too much and annoyed them and then I couldn't hold certain issues on my body, I released them into this little thing called diaper.  And I made a mess, but still then, though they were not very delighted about me doing that, but still they were not planning how do we get rid of this kid? They had love. Because of that position in the family, my conditions always improved. My conditions always changed. So the same happens with our relationship with God. If you look at this graph, you will see that our condition, it fluctuates, but our position in God always remains the same. When you became a Christian, you have a position in the heart of God as a child of God. You're special to Him. You mean a lot to Him.   There is nothing they can do or cannot do to make you disown them. God's love is even greater. When you begin to meditate and how much He loves you, because of this position you have in His heart, the condition you have in your life today, that condition will always change. You will grow out of your diapers. You will learn how to walk. You will learn how to talk. You will get your license spiritually speaking. You will get into your own house spiritually speaking. You will overcome. One day you will be a leader. One day you will be a pastor.  The position and the love that God has for you will never change. You will change because of that, but God's love for you will never change. And when you receive that love, when you receive that position, when you receive that understanding, you are free not to get stuck in the situation that you are in, but to constantly evolve, constantly grow, go from one stage to another stage. Go from poverty to prosperity, from weakness to strength, from sickness to healing. From disappointment to God's appointment, because God's love is constant. Your problems are not. Does somebody say amen? If you read Corinthians, if you can put the Corinthians verses. Corinthians, Paul starts a letter to Corinthians and he says this to the church of God and he describes, he says, you are sanctified in Jesus and called to be saints. You have this picture of Corinthians. They are holy people. He says, and you are in him righteous. You are sanctification. You are redemption. You are God's wisdom. So you see this picture of Corinthians and then Paul begins to take a turn.  How fast they grafted from chapter one to chapter three. They became carnal in the same epistle. And then if you continue to read chapters later on, he says, actually there's sexual immorality among you. And he says, and by the way, you're also puffed up. First two, he talks about their position in Christ. He said, you are holy. You are sanctified. You guys are awesome. He says, and you guys are fleshly. You guys have some issues with lust and you got some issues with pride. You may say, how can one church, how can one person have all of that in themselves? The same way, a child can be a son and still wear diapers.  And they become who they are in the heart of their parents. Can somebody say amen? It's a basic truth, but without this truth, we will never grow as Christians. And without this truth, few problems happen. People could not understand how Christians can have demons because they don't know this truth. People cannot understand how can you be healed in the stripes of Jesus and still have symptoms in your body? How can you have victory in Jesus and still struggle with something? How can you be righteous in Jesus and still have certain behaviors that you're not happy with? In Jesus Christ, you are righteous. But in life, you are becoming that which Jesus gave you for free. Can somebody say amen? It's like the story of this Japanese soldier who went to war, World War II. And he went to war in Philippines. And when he was there, the war after a few years, the war ended. And this brother, Hiro Onoda, he was a Japanese soldier who continued to fight World War II 29 years after the war was over. He was hiding in the mountains of Philippines, fighting, war was over. The position that the war was in already, that the war is over, war is done. But the condition this man was, was the condition of, I still have to fight. I still have to fight. I still have to fight. They kept bringing flyers. The Japanese were bringing flyers on the mountains, dropping through the aeroplanes. So the people will read the flyer that the war is over. And when he would see the flyer, he would think that this is a propaganda.  When one of his workers, there's three of them. When one of them defected to the enemy and he came back and he says, listen, you don't have to fight no more. The war is over. He says, listen, they paid you. I'm not going to believe that lie. And he stood his ground until one day a college student heard about this man and decided to put a backpack on and go into the mountains in Philippines and search for him. And he found him and he says, it's been 29 years since the war you're fighting has already been won. It has already ended. I'm sorry, it has already ended. You need to come back home. And the man said this, I'm not going back home until the very man, the general, that sent me to this war comes and tells me that the war is over. The college student leaves that meeting with him, goes back to Japan, he tracks, took some months to track the general, who is a librarian now. Comes to the general, who is a librarian, says, please, I'll buy you a ticket. We've got to help this poor guy who's still fighting a war that's already ended, 29 years ago, that go into the mountains with this librarian who used to be a general. They sit down with him and they tell him, the war has ended. He can now come home. Positionally, the war ended 29 years ago. But because his mind was not changed, he still was in that war for 29 years. What happens today? God did it 2,000 years ago, but many people still live in sin. 2,000 years ago, Jesus ended Satan's reign over this earth spiritually. But we can still live in bondage practically because that's why we need to go to church. That's why we read the Word of God. That's why we listen to podcasts so that our mind gets renewed. It's not a propaganda. It's not a preacher's have to say something. It's not a pep talk. It's not just inspiration that people's lives can't change. People can be healed. People can be delivered. People can prosper. You don't have to repeat the cycle of the past that they've always seen. Through the blood, through the cross, through the Word of God, through the Holy Spirit, our life can be changed. And that's why we come to church to hear that, to change our thinking, to align it with the Word of God. Can somebody say amen? If you have your Bible, I will read 2 Samuel 9 verse 8. And this is a story of David finding Mephibosheth, who was the son of Jonathan and grandson of King Saul. And David remembered the contract he made with Jonathan and decides to search him out to show him kindness. And when the news came to Mephibosheth, this is what had happened.  Mephibosheth said of himself, Why should you look at me if I'm just like a dead dog? Dogs have a simple purpose in the family. Very little purpose, not too much purpose. They take up their food and then they make up a lot of mess. But they're still good. They give certain responses, certain feel in the family, bring things together. Dogs are not bad.    A dead dog cannot be petted.  And Mephibosheth says about himself. He says, Why is the king interested in someone who's a dead dog? He says, I don't even have teeth. I can't even bark. I'm nobody. My life is meaningless. My life is purposeless. My life has no purpose and no meaning. The dead dog mentality plagues our country today. Yesterday I came across a statistic. A suicide rate in America recently reached a 25 year high. Every day in America 105 people die out of suicide. Suicide is the second leading cause of death among college students. Suicide kills more Americans than car crashes making it number one form of self injury. Across the globe suicide is the 15 leading cause of death taking lives of 800,000 people a year. One person dies in this country by suicide every 13 minutes. And every 40 seconds in the world somebody takes their own life. In a single year 8.3 million have had suicidal thoughts. For every person that commits suicide 25 people attempted. For every person that commits suicide 25 people attempt to take their own life. Around the world 350 million individuals have been affected by depression. American association of a suicide finds that untreated depression is number one risk for suicide in young people. More than half of people who attempted suicide talk about their suicidal thoughts and the feelings beforehand means they expressed it to someone. They told someone I feel this and afterwards this is what happened. 80% of those who seek treatment for depression see improvement within 6 weeks of getting professional help.  He feels completely purposeless and senseless. As Suicide is a very sensitive topic. It's a very sensitive for those of us even in the church and for those of us who ever had somebody who took their own life. I came across to a wonderful gentleman just last Sunday who came to me and he says, you have no idea what I went through just 3 days before that. He says I was on the edge of taking my own life. With tears rolling down his eyes. A young man that if I would point this young man you would say you have so much to live for. You have such a destiny. You have such a purpose.   You must see that what the enemy does is the enemy bombards us in our condition, in our circumstances, in our environment and our predicament. It's not what we're surrounded with that's the biggest problem. It's what creeps into our head. And the enemy settles a fact in our mind.  Your life has no purpose. Your life will never change. Your life will never get better. Your health will never improve. You will never find somebody to settle with. Your finances will never change. Your situation will never change. Your marriage will never change. So you know what just opt out. There are people all around the hospital in this city who would pay any price to take your health and to give you theirs. If you have a heart that beats, lungs, kidneys, bones that are not broken. If you have a brain that operates. If you have nerves that are connected to your brain and none of them are injured.  Go to someone laying on a dialysis today. And you will see they'll pay any price just to have the body. Not the life, just the body that you have. But the enemy uses our situation to paint a new picture of a lie and give us a picture.  Your life has no meaning. Why? Because your parents are getting divorced. Your life has no meaning. Why? Because your husband left you. Your life has no meaning. Why?  Your life has no meaning. Why? Because you have a little minor health condition. Your life is purposeless. Why? Because somebody didn't shake your hand in the church.    Can somebody say amen? See this dead dog mentality comes from four reasons. Number one is because of our past family history. Mephibosheth, his grandpa was consulting a witch doctor. His grandpa Saul was a maniac. And many times when we come from a family where we see a traces of depression. Where we see traces of demonic attacks. We see traces of divorce. It begins to affect us. The demons use the past history of our family. To infiltrate our mind. Not just our circumstances, but to infiltrate our mind. To paint a picture. You are worthless. You have no purpose. And your life has no future. But just because you had a past, it doesn't mean it has to be your future. Just because you had a past, it doesn't mean it has to be your future. Can somebody say amen? The second thing that the enemy uses to bring this mentality over dead dog. Is that he uses our past trauma. Mephibosheth at the age of five, he was dropped by a nurse. When the war broke out and his father was killed in a battle. His nurse dropped him at the age of five. Being dropped by someone who is supposed to carry you. Brings a trauma into your life that many people seldomly recover. Without help of professionals. And without the help of deliverance. And we have many times people who get dropped. The people that you trusted in and they maybe break the trust.  Or just the words that were called into us. Or certain situations that created in us in our past. Where we carry a certain drama. Certain trauma, certain drama. And what it does is it creates a mindset. I'm not good enough. I'll settle for anything. My life is not going to mean anything. I'll never get married. If they find out my secret, if they know what I've been through. You know, they'll never want to be with me.  Because every trauma, the Bible says Jesus Christ came to heal the broken hearted. He didn't come just to put a bandaid on it. He came to completely cure and completely restore our trauma in Jesus' name. Because somebody say amen. But another reason why many times we have this mentality is because of the name calling. Word means from a mouth of shame.  How would you like to be referred by that name?  I don't know why they call them. Who ever thought of them. Who was drunk maybe. Who called them like that. This is completely inappropriate. But a kid walks around every day being called with this weird name. Maybe your name is not Mephibosheth.  We'll never amount to anything. I'm not successful. I don't amount to things. That's why one of the first things that God did with people when he met them is he would change their names. He would change some names who were bad into great. And some names who were good into great. He met Abraham and Abraham's name was Abraham means a glorious father. That's a good name. And God says no. That's a name that reflects your father. You're going to kick it with me? And you're going to be a father of multitudes. We're going to add one more A, Abraham. Jesus meets Peter and says that you're shaking. He says no wonder you're acting like that. He says I'm going to give you a new name. You're going to be a rock. God comes and meets Jacob.  You trickster. You lie. You always trick your way to the top. And God says I will give you a name Israel because you wrestle with God and you will prevail with man. God always when he meets you, he rips the label that people put on you, that you put on yourself. And God says I'm going to give you a label that reflects a relationship you have with me. God wants to change your name. And you need to change the way you call yourself. The way you see yourself.  And you have to tell yourself I am blessed. You have to tell yourself you are good looking. You have to tell yourself that you are righteous. If you don't tell yourself and you expect someone else to do that.   And somebody say amen. The last thing is why we get this mindset is because of our current environment. For Mephibosheth he lived in this place called Lobodar. It's called no pastor. He lived in a place that was parched. Lived in a place that was famined. He currently at that point when he lived there was nothing growing. Kind of electricity. Without irrigation we're just a desert. And in those days if you are like that you're not going to make it because everything was based on farms. And so he lived in a place that was parched. Place of no pastor. And so no wonder was easy for him to live every single day with a mindset. I am a dead dog. I am no good. Nobody is interested in me. And I will never amount to anything. I'm crippled. My grandpa was a psychopath. My legs are not walking right. I live in a terrible location. All of the property of my father has been taken away. I've been traumatized. I've been called with names. And I'm old.  And the Bible says while this was happening. There was something else happening behind the scenes. A long time ago his daddy Jonathan and David made a pact together. They made a covenant. And the covenant said where David is going to be nice to Jonathan's descendants. And one of these descendants was Mephibosheth. And when David became a king things were going good. He had a lot of finances a lot of resources. He thought to be nice to the descendants of Jonathan his friend. And he comes and sends a messenger and says find me a Mephibosheth. And bring him into my court I want to be nice to him. For his father's sake. Not for his sake but for his father's sake. And I want to tell you something today. The reason why David was nice to Mephibosheth. Was not because of Mephibosheth. It was because of a covenant between his father and David. Mephibosheth had nothing to do with it. It's almost like Mephibosheth see and David comes to Mephibosheth and says come. You will come to my court and Mephibosheth says I'm nobody. David says it has nothing to do with you. I'm not coming here because of you. I'm not coming here because of your education. I'm not coming here to hire you as somebody to be in my court. This Mephibosheth stop thinking about yourself. You're so conscious that somehow you qualified or you maybe applied for a lottery. It has nothing to do with you. I am being kind to you because of your daddy. You happens to be with your daddy. That's why. I want to tell you something today. God's goodness and grace is not dependent on you. It's dependent on Jesus. The Bible says God made a covenant with Jesus. You know we see five covenants in the Bible. We see the Adamic covenant. We see the Noah's covenant. We see the covenant God made with Israel. We see the covenant God makes with David. And there is one more covenant God makes. And it's not with us. It's with Jesus Christ. When he makes the covenant with Jesus Christ and you are in Jesus. God wants to treat you good because of that covenant. God wants to treat you good because of that covenant. You are positioned in the covenant with Jesus. That means that your life can change dramatically. That means that your life can be transformed. It's interesting. What I love about Mephibosheth is that though he felt below the carpet. He still dragged himself to the king's court. He admitted how he felt. He says I'm not good. I'm terrible. Yet he still ended up in the king's palace. That encourages me. I can feel like a dead dog.  Sometimes I can think like a dead dog. But I still have to act like God calls me. Even if within myself there is a battle going on. Because how I lived, what I've been, who dropped me. Who was my grandparents, the generational curses. But if the king calls and the king says. I am interested in you. My feelings, my thoughts, my past, my trauma. All of that has to go back in the trunk. Because the king's word has to prevail. And what the good is, is not only we see how he felt. But we also know where he was feeding himself. The Bible says he was eating at the table of the king. I want you to learn this today. How you feel should never determine where you feed. How you feel should never determine where you are feasting. How you feel should never determine where you are sitting. You may be feeling like a dead dog. But God says I want to position you at my table. That means with the way you feel. You act what God says. And you will see that your feelings will take a back seat. And we see what happened with Mephibosheth. Is that the properties of his father. All of them was restored to Mephibosheth. Because he acted not on his feelings. But on the word of the king. Not only that. We see when he was seated at the king's table. His lame legs. His crippled legs. They were covered by the table. And nobody saw except him and the king that Mephibosheth was crippled. When you begin to stop acting on how you feel. But start acting on what God says about you. You will begin to see that you will no longer be conscious. And people will no longer be conscious of your infirmity. Of your situation. And your past or your background. They will see you as a different person. Because you will present yourself as a different person. When our Lord Jesus Christ faced a Lazarus tomb. And the Bible says that everybody cried and groaned. Jesus Christ, he says he groaned inside. That means the tone of his voice. His emotional, his facial expression changed. And the Bible says the shortest verse in the Bible. Jesus wept. He emotionally got down to the level that he was in. He was crying. He was broken. He was shot. Emotionally Jesus was connecting with where people were. But what I love Jesus for. It's not only that he feels the emotions. It's that he's not led by emotions. Because you see in the next verse he says show me where you buried him. And you would think oh he wants to go see by the grave and just cry more. He wants to go and just groan more. But he comes to the grave and he says remove the stone. Why would you say that? Because Jesus felt one thing. He acted completely on a different level. See you can feel the level of death. Make sure you act on the level of life. You can feel the level of depression. Make sure you act on the level of God's promise. You can have tears rolling down your eyes. Confusion filling down your mind. You can have emotions raging against you. But when all of that is done you said I know who I am. I know who is behind me and who lives inside of me. His name is the Holy Spirit. You can have prognosis. Symptoms raging in your body.  And your heart be confused. But your heart is submitted to the word of God. And God's word settles everything. Because somebody say amen. I want to challenge each person this morning. How you feel has very little to do with your future. You can feel like a dead dog. You can feel like you don't have ideas for your future. You can feel like your finances will never change. You can feel like your future in relationship will never change. But God says I want to be good to you. Because Jesus paid a heavy lofty price on the Calvary. And God says allow me to be good to you. By not imprisoning your future. To the predicament of your mindset today. Set free your mind to dream with God. Set free your mind to be on the level of God's promise. Not on the level of your situation. Or on the level of your feelings. And when you set your mind free. And you say I'm crippled. And you say I am from the place of no pastor. I've been traumatized. But in my mind I let it out. And I say God I'm going to be at the king's table. He prepares me at table. In the presence of my enemies. In the presence of sickness. God says come up. Sit down. Let's eat. He said but Lord the enemy is staring at me. Do you see the dirty looks the enemy is giving to me. And God says keep eating. Keep feeding. Keep feeding. Keep eating. Why? And drive the devil nuts. And if he can't stand you blessed give him a chair.


So this is the common iliac on the right side, dividing it to the external iliac and the internal iliac. And it's accompanied by the respective vanes. This is supine cadaver, female cadaver. The narration is from the right side, the camera person is on the left side. So let's focus on the internal iliac to see the distribution of the internal iliac inside the pelvis on the right side. We can see that the internal iliac is dividing into two principal divisions. This is one division which we have picked up here. This is the anterior division and this is the posterior division. So let's take a look at the branches of the anterior division. The first branch, this one that we can see here, this is the obliterated umbilical artery and you can see it is fibrosis. This is the one which forms the medial umbilical ligament. That's the distal part of the umbilical artery. The proximal part of the umbilical artery is patent and we can see it is giving branches. These are the superior vesicle arteries which supply the bladder from the dome of the bladder. So the next branch is this one. This is the uterine artery and we can see it is going to the uterus. And the important relationship of the uterine artery is this structure which is going right under that. This is the ureter. So the mnemonic that we use to remember this is water runs under the bridge. Water being the ureter and the bridge being the uterine artery. So that is the second branch. The third branch is supposed to be the operator artery. But in this case, we see an anatomical variation. This is the operator nerve that we see here. And accompanying this operator nerve, we have this artery here. This is the operator artery. In this particular case, the operator artery is not arising from the anterior division. It is coming from the posterior division of the internal aliac. And it is going through the operator canal in the operator membrane. So this is supposedly the third division of the anterior division of the internal aliac. Now let's look deeper. We see this artery here. This is the inferior gluteal artery which comes out of the greater sciatic foramen below the piriformis. And accompanying that, we have this artery here. This is the internal pudendal artery which also exists through the greater sciatic foramen and reenters the perineum through the lesser sciatic foramen. Now let's take a look at the posterior division. And this is the posterior division. We can see that the posterior division is giving this branch here. This is the iliolumbar artery. The next branch, as I already mentioned, is the operator artery which should not be coming from the posterior division but it is coming. The next branch that we can see here is this one running medially. This is the lateral sacral. And finally, the main posterior division we can see is going inside and my instrument has also gone in. That is the superior gluteal artery which comes out from the greater sciatic foramen above the piriformis. So these are all the branches of the internal aliac that we can see on the right side with its anatomical variations. Thank you very much for watching. Dr. Sanjay Sanyal signing out. If you have any questions or comments, please put them in the comment section below. Have a nice day.


We're going to do the break first and then at the end with the new dice we're going to re-randomize your names and the top 18 we'll get into that noir break which is sold out coming up in a separate video. Big thanks to these folks for getting into the action. Let's go names and teams through the break first four and one five times for each list one two three four and a one fifth and final time after five we've got Richard down to Robert all right four to one five times for the teams one after five we've got wizard down to the Mavs no trade windows in these little filler breaks we just want to get straight to one these spots all right so here's the first half of the list right here Jimmy Connell with the gris we've got where the Pelicans the Robert Runkle with the Pelicans Sean Maddock with the heat so on and so forth all right so let's get all this on one page let's sort by column B let's just print and rip TWC trained with no clue all right right out of the gate right on top is LeBron James bringing a championship back home to LA that was very nice that goes to Matt and the girls got triple J Zach Levine we've got some stars on the background here that's it is that exclusive to this set looks cool though and a Zion Williamson rookie card nice Pelicans Robert Runkle not a bad pack at all the LeBron Zion rookie card and this Zach Levine card as well for the Bulls Robert Runkle nice all right so now we're gonna take all these names again right here put them all into a new list and roll some fresh dice there it is right there and let's see top 18 so more than half of this break are gonna be in that noir break after five and six eleven times gonna make you sweat it out a little bit 1 2 3 10 and 11th and final time so from 19 down to 30 my apologies thanks for giving it a shot though congrats to the top 18 I got Matt Jimmy Sean Brian Matt Matt Sean Roger Robert Richard Matt Kevin Matt Robert Brian Nicholas Robert and Matt Lieber and there you have it we'll put a little rooftop next to your name so you know you won that in one of these little filler breaks right here thanks for watching thanks for trying I'll see you next time on jazby's case breaks.com


Hi and welcome to the session. Let us discuss the polyquestion. The question says a cricket ball is projected to the velocity of 29.4 m per second. Find first part is the greatest range on the horizontal plane and second part is the angle of projection to give a range of 44.10 m. In the question we have given that cricket ball is projected with the velocity of 29.4 m per second. That means initial velocity that is 0 is equal to 29.4 m per second. We have to find the greatest range on the horizontal plane. We know that greatest range which we denote by r is given by u squared by g. Now here u is equal to 29.4 m per second. So we have 29.4 whole squared by g is 9.8. This is equal to 29.4 into 29.4 divided by 9.8. On simplifying this we get 88.2. So greatest range on the horizontal plane is 88.2 meters. Now this is our answer to the first part. Second part we have to find the angle of projection to give a range of 44.10 m. Let alpha be the angle of projection for a range of 44.10 m. We know that range is given by u squared sine 2 alpha by g. Now here we are given r as 44.10 m. We have 44.10 equals to u is 29.4. We have 29.4 whole squared into sine 2 alpha by g is 9.8. Now this implies sine 2 alpha is equal to 44.10 into 9.8 divided by 29.4 into 29.4. On simplifying this we get 1 by 2. So we have sine 2 alpha equals to 1 by 2. This implies sine 2 alpha is equal to sine 30. This implies 2 alpha is equal to 30 degree and this implies alpha is equal to 15 degree. Hence our required answer of the first part is 88.2 meters and of the second part is 15 degree. So this completes the session. Bye and take care.


I was getting this for you man, I didn't touch you at all. You did. The other part was an accident. And then you just...  Do you feel vulnerable right now? Yeah. Come on.