today I want to share with you and review my favorite day pack for hiking for day hikes specifically we're going to review the osprey tempest 20 liters for women this is hands down the best day pack for day hikes in my opinion there is a similar version for men's alex has that one so if you want to see a review from alex leave a comment and we will get him to review his men's version but for right now we'll focus on the tempest 20 liters for women if you are in the market looking for a new backpack this is the one this is the best out there in my opinion i've used it for so many years and it's still my absolute favorite and i'm going to share with you what makes this backpack really special so we'll start first of all with the number one thing that i always always look for when i'm choosing a day pack and that is the back frame so it's very important for me because i have a very sensitive back that the frame is comfortable so with many other even osprey backpacks they are not all as comfortable and as soft as this one they have this technology with air foam that kind of adjusts and bends and takes the shape of your back so when i wear this backpack the frame is not very rigid with my other backpack it's really painful and it's just difficult to keep wearing it for an extended amount of time while if you see right here it really is taking the shape of my back that's the number one thing that i absolutely love about this backpack the second thing is the separate compartment for water bladder not all backpack have a separate section just for the water bladder usually have to open inside of the backpack to place your water bladder it makes it difficult to grab anything else in your backpack while for this specific backpack it's separated so i already have water bladder right here i usually use it for my osprey three liters water bladder but for right now this is the one that i found this is 1.5 liters and it's very simple so before you fill your backpack with anything really right now i have a couple of things inside just to give it some some shape but you open this section you slide your water bladder and then i hope that you guys can see it here but there's a clip you just run it through this hole and then clip it and then this way it keeps the water bladder a little bit lifted this way you have some space at the bottom of your backpack and then i can attach the the tube and then just run it either left or right however is more comfortable for you for right now i'm gonna detach it i do by the way have a full video about my osprey three liters water bladder i talk about just a general review and then i talk about how to clean it how to dry it so i will leave all of those videos in the first comments you can go and check it out but anyway so water bladder separated from the inside of the backpack which is pretty convenient the other thing that i love about this backpack are all of the pockets that are available to you so first there is an upper pocket that's pretty wide so anything that you need to access easily like usually here i would throw my sunscreen maybe emergency blanket maybe extra battery so they would live in there and then in the main section of the backpack there is another little mesh pocket i hope that's how we call it and it's got a little clip right here we usually like to use this clip to to attach our keys this way we don't lose them and then inside there's enough space 20 liters this is enough even if you are going for a very long day of hiking it's enough space and then you've got one pocket to the right and to the left either for your hydro flask or for your nudge in water bottle and then there are hip pockets for your snacks or goo tablets chewies i think you can fit your iphone in here i actually don't remember yeah i don't think so especially with with a case i don't think the iphone is gonna fit in there and then the one that i love the most is this outer mesh and it's got an elastic mesh so even if you have a lot of things with you that you want to fit in there you can squeeze them in because it is pretty elastic i use this backpack not just for hiking but i also used it for biking it was pretty comfortable for biking i used it for rock climbing especially i used it when i went snowshoeing before rock climbing i learned this little trick right here you know how with rock climbing you have to have a helmet with you this piece right here you can use it the helmet has plenty of holes so you can run it through one of these holes and then attach the helmet to your backpack there we go i think it looks just fine helmet taken care of i did the same thing with snowshoes before and it probably wasn't the the best idea you see how it's gone a little bit loose probably when i use the snowshoes because they are pretty heavy i'm not sure if it was built intentionally for helmets like this but it does the job another cool trick right here on the left side there is a pocket i'm not sure what it was meant for but this is what i use it for i usually have my gopro with me when i'm hiking to take footage and it fits perfectly in there how cool so if i need to use my gopro just grab it fill and then put it back this is probably one of my favorite things about this backpack and then it's got it's got a strap right here and then another hip strap there we go and it also has a whistle like having a built-in whistle so that when you are packing you don't even have to think about it you don't have to think about the emergency kit having a whistle this is great i think the majority of all spray backpacks they do have the built-in whistle which is really cool i also like that they give you a bunch of holes right here to attach your trekking poles all spray did a very good job of thinking about the very tiny details when it comes to designing this backpack and like i said if you're looking for a new one this is the right one it comes in different colors if i'm not wrong there's blue they have purple and they have green maybe other colors so i'm going to leave a link to this exact backpack in the first comments if you guys enjoyed this video please give it a thumbs up and subscribe to the channel i share gear reviews like this every now and then thank you so much for watching my name is Habiba this is trekking pals and i will see you soon on a new adventure bye


Live from Madrid, Spain. It's theCUBE, covering HPE Discover Madrid 2017. Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Welcome back to Madrid, Spain, everybody. This is theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. We're here covering HPE Discover Madrid. I'm Dave Vellante with my co-host, Peter Burris. Vaibhav Parmar is here, he's a partner with PWC. Good to see you again. Good afternoon, thank you for having me here. Yeah, you're welcome. So, PWC obviously, people know it as top consultancy, global capabilities, deep industry expertise, but give us the update on sort of your role and where you're focused. Sure, so I represent our technology consulting organization at PWC and basically we work with our clients and our business partners in bridging the gap between the business solution and the business outcome that are intended and all of the enabling technologies that get to the outcome. And so our role is to design solutions, help implement and get them deployed and make sure they work properly. All with the objective of this technology has to be aligned to the outcome, the business results that are being intended. So we provide that traceability from the beginning to the end and we are the part of the consulting organization that focuses on the use of these new and emerging technologies for bringing that business realization. So anybody who's followed the tech business obviously has been following cloud and the impact that cloud has had on customers, on industry competition, on how companies partner, go to market, et cetera, and achieve outcomes. So hybrid cloud is all the rage. Hybrid IT, what does that mean to you? You hear it from Hewlett Packard Enterprise, what does it mean to PWC? Sure, so I think the word hybrid has become very pervasive now as we think about technology, as we think about IT. And there's several definitions to the word hybrid or the terminology hybrid IT. First, it's the use of multiple types of technology environments to deliver the outcome. It could be a public cloud provided by one of the major cloud providers. It could be all of the on-premise traditional data center technologies and infrastructure. It could be a combination of both using some third-party intermediary in a co-location or in a hosted manner. But that's one part of the hybrid definition. The second part of it is actually being able to access services and capabilities that are built and innovated by the providers. So if you look at where Microsoft is going with Azure and all of the platform as a service capabilities that they've introduced into the marketplace, how do we take advantage of that so that we're not building individual Lego blocks? We're actually taking Lego blocks that have been built and assembling them for some type of a business outcome. So hybrid is also taking advantage of the services that have been pre-built, pre-defined, so that we can fuse them together to get the result that we're looking for. And the third part of hybrid is what we're now starting to take advantage of with the public cloud providers, which is we use what we need and only pay for what we need. In the traditional model, we buy this much and we may be used to using this much at some point in time, this much at some point in time. I think in a new and emerging model, we only want to pay for what we need and what we use, whether it's in a public cloud manner or it's in our own data center manner. So hybrid is also that flexible consumption and economic model associated with all of this technology and the infrastructure. So what's the predominant conversation going on with customers today? Are they saying, Bob, help me get to the public cloud. I don't want to have all this infrastructure in-house or are they saying, look, I can't move everything to the cloud, but I want that cloud experience in my own operations. Hybrid IT obviously is the latter, but what's the dominant discussion with customers? So I think it starts often as the first because customers hear that, hey, everybody's talking about the public cloud, maybe I need to be there. But then very quickly, we come to the conclusion that a public cloud by itself may not be enough or adequate and we actually need to think about the hybrid model for a number of reasons. It could be for data governance and compliance reasons. There are jurisdictions and municipalities that have data residency requirements which make public cloud more difficult to use. It could be for performance reasons where a lot of the applications and the use cases are of a nature that an on-premise environment will continue to make more sense. So very quickly, we move to the point of view that a hybrid model is the more probable and practical model, but the conversation also is not so much that I want to be in the public cloud or I need a hybrid cloud, it's more so around, here's the outcome in the business result that I'm looking to achieve. It could be that I want to get more features out to the market faster. It could be that I want to take advantage of innovation that's available to me so that I don't have to invest in that myself. It could be that my developers are antsy for all of this new technology that's available and they don't want to be encumbered by more traditional life cycle activities. All of that then leads to the decision or the discussion on, okay, well this sounds like a cloud-oriented mindset, let's talk about what is available to us to get more flexibility, to get more agility, to get the developers all the tools that they're looking for. And that's where we quickly start saying, okay, the public cloud has all of these offerings, but again, it may not be adequate enough and we need to complement that with a non-premise environment and the hybrid model becomes a natural landing point. So the technology's a means to that outcome end. Okay, so in thinking about the realities of hybrid cloud, hybrid IT, whatever you want to call it, how do you actually, you've named some attributes and some parameters, how do you actually bring those to the clients, how do you make it real? Sure, so I think we have to think about what is it that we need to make it real? Again, if we think about it from a developer point of view, they want quick access to environment so they can do testing, they can do code reviews, right? And the environment has to be stood up in a very timely manner. Today it takes time to request the environment, to do all of the configurations, make sure all the security processes are in place, but the developers want quick access because they want to turn that code over very quickly. So that's one part of what is needed to make this real, let's think about the developers. The second part of it is around operations. We want this to be safe, we want this to be secure, we want this to be aligned to our corporate policies on regulation, on use, whatever it might be. And so we have to think about, okay, well, what are all of those elements that make this compliant, that make this highly aligned to our security policies? The third part is the economic part of the equation. Again, we want to only pay for what we want to use. How do we make that a reality in an on-premise world where we're used to traditionally spending a lot of money at one time and then we're just amortizing that over time? Well, in this new world, we need that economic model as well, right? The ability to only pay for what we need yet still have the capacity that we're looking for. So when we think about what is needed to make this a reality, I think it's the infrastructure in an on-premise environment has to look and feel very much like the infrastructure that's in the public cloud. Highly accessible, you can turn it on and turn it off when you need it. You can spin up these environments when you need it and then you turn them off when you don't need them. It's the consumption model and the economic model. Again, I'm only going to pay for what I need and not for excess capacity. So that capability has to be there as well. And then the third is the fact that developers are highly motivated by these innovative capabilities that are available in the public cloud model. So, firewall as a service, storage as a service. How do we make that equally available in an on-premise environment? The on-premise world and the cloud world have to look very much alike from an infrastructure point of view, from an application and services point of view, and from an economic and sourcing point of view. That's what's needed to make it a reality. Is the Delta, so that all sounds great and it's consistent with what we see in our research. But then, but when you start to peel the onion on what exactly goes in on-prem, it isn't exactly like the cloud, but maybe it doesn't have to be. Does it just have to be substantially better than what was there before and substantially mimic the cloud? With some other attributes that the cloud can't deliver, for instance, data residency and other locality stuff, maybe governance, maybe not. I mean, that's one you got to really think through. Some of the cloud guys would say, hey, we got great security and great governance, but is it mapped to my edX as an organization? So, there's some nuance there, but I guess my question is, how close do you actually have to get to satisfy the sort of customer demand? How close to that cloud model? So again, I think I would say we can try to match it from a CPU to CPU point of view or from a storage terabytes, petabytes point of view. But again, our observation and our experience in working with our clients is it's not so much at that level, it's more so at the behavior level. Again, if I'm a developer, I don't want to wait two, three weeks for somebody to stand up an environment. I want to be able to stand it up in 30 minutes or an hour because my code is a microcode. It's not a big monolithic waterfall-oriented code anymore. So if I have a microcode that I want to quickly test, I want to be able to have the environment that's quickly accessible, and when I'm done with it, it can go away. So it's those functional attributes that we have to match. How we technically match them, we can go in many different directions. I think one of the things that we're excited about where HPE is going as an example is with Azure Stack. The availability of Azure Stack in collaboration with Microsoft in an on-premise environment looks and feels very much like the public cloud environment with the ability to get the microservices that we're looking for, with the ability to spin up and spin down the environments in the timely manners that we're looking for. Those are the attributes that I think are the, what we see as our clients looking for and behind the scenes how we technologically enable them, it doesn't have to be a like-for-like match. So the exciting thing is we're seeing the evolution take place, we're seeing the availability now, and it's time to start taking advantage of it. So we talk about hybrid cloud, but in many respects we're really talking about multi-cloud. That's really going to be the challenge.  So a number of years ago, we had a lot of mini computer companies with a lot of specialized networks and if you were running a plant, you'd have all these little mini, and you'd say, I want a single network for everything. And they'd say, yeah, bridge my network, gateway my network, all this other stuff, and along came TCPIP and flattened everything. And that drove a lot of the mini computer companies into, I mean, HP survived because they were one of the first ones to address and adopt TCPIP in a big way. So here's the question. We're going to have hybrid cloud, but it's inevitable we're going to have multi-cloud. Because we're going to have SaaS, we're going to have IAAS, we're going to have on-premise, we're going to have Edge, and all these have to share attributes, as you're saying, of the cloud experience. How are companies going to start thinking about flattening all those different cloud options so they are not recreating the legacy of having to manage all this stuff, but adding a transaction cost of having to do that through a contractual arrangement. Where is this going to end up? Sure. So I think there's a couple of ways to think about that. If we think about the cloud model, you mentioned those terms, infrastructure as a service, you have platform as a service, and you have software as a service. I think we're making a lot of progress on the infrastructure as a service layer, becoming more and more flatter, and more and more consistent across the different providers. Consistent across your private cloud providers, consistent across your public cloud providers, and what I mean by that. Give us an example. So an example would be as we look at where technologies like OpenStack and OpenShift are going. You're essentially turning all of this infrastructure into virtual elements, right? I want a computing resource. Whether it's this company's CPU or this company's CPU, it shouldn't matter. I'm looking for storage. Whether it's this company's storage or that company's storage, it shouldn't matter. I just need high-speed storage, which might be flash, or I need more traditional storage because it's all static data, which may be more disk-based storage. We're becoming more and more flatter from that point of view. And behind the scenes, again, it could be a white box, it could be a branded box. It doesn't really matter to us anymore. So we're making good progress at the infrastructure layer. And on top of it, we've got good control mechanisms to be able to access that infrastructure function. Again, through OpenStack-type technologies, right, that provide this control mechanism so you can provision, you can source, and you can manage and operate. As you get to the next level, which is platform as a service, this becomes a little tricky because this is where you're getting into the application layer that's taking advantage of that infrastructure. And here, you do have differences between the cloud providers. One cloud provider may choose to offer a set of platform services that are built one way, whereas somebody else may do it a little bit differently. And so that does require some contemplation, right? Are we going to go down this path or go down this path because getting a firewall function from this provider, it still gives us a firewall function that this provider provides, but it's done a little bit differently. And that may not be always, you may not be able to make it flat, right? Because it's just the nature of how the application layer is being built up. As you move to the software as a service layer, this is purely at the application layer now, right? And there you will always have differences. Software as a service coming from one CRM provider or HR services provider will be different than another one. But what they've done is completely abstracted all of the underlying requirements. You don't need to worry about infrastructure. You don't need to worry about platform. You're purely sourcing the software function. So I think as going back to your question of where will we get to when it comes to flattening all of these things, I think at the infrastructure layer, we will get there because it's happening. At the platform layer, we may not get there because it's the nature of the business and the functions that these providers are developing and making available. And at the software layer, we won't get there because it doesn't make sense, right? We're going to focus on the business outcome and not necessarily the software itself. Well, how about at the governance layer? My last question, at the governance layer across all these multi-clouds, the SaaS, the platform as a service, the infrastructure, can we get to a common governance model? And why is your approach, talk to me as a customer, how can you help me get to that common governance model? Why is that approach better than just sort of doing it on my own or doing it with a cloud provider? Sure, so you bring up a great point that despite the fact that we will have variances in the cloud providers and the cloud capabilities, yeah, we do need some way to properly manage, run, orchestrate, operate, and govern all of these different multi-cloud scenarios that we will be in as a large enterprise. And so governance becomes a key tenet of how do we make this successful? And governance has a number of different definitions behind it. It's the operating model and the policies by which you provide access to the cloud services. So how do we make sure that a developer isn't just clicking a button and spinning up environments without the right controls behind it? Whether it's in this cloud provider or in this cloud provider. So putting in the policies and controls in place is one element of governance. The second part is having a consistent mechanism for connecting into those cloud providers through the right APIs and interfaces so that when somebody says I need additional storage, you're not having to create bespoke processes and technical interfaces between one provider and a different provider. You almost need an abstraction layer that provides all of the transparency in the back end so you can plug to provider A, provider B, but on the front end to the developers, to the architects, it looks like I want more storage, right? And this machine will do all of the translation behind the scenes. So that's the second part of governance. The third part is on the operating model, on the operations itself. How do we make sure that the cloud provider is holding up to their commitments in terms of reliability, availability, right throughput, all of these commitments that they've made so that we can get the performance results that we're looking for? Well, provider A is going to have a different set of mechanisms to run and operate their environment compared to a provider B. So governance also includes this element of looking at all of those different mechanisms by which the environments are being monitored and operated and giving us that consistent view. So we know that, yep, we're getting the services and the performance and the throughput that we're looking for. And we've got a common set of processes and tools that allow us to interface into each of those providers on the back end. So we're not having to do all of this B spoke tools development, we can do it in a common way. And the fourth part to governance is ongoing controls. So how do we make sure that what we're expecting to use, what we're expecting to consume is aligned to the forecast and that we're not deviating. If we are deviating, there's a good rationale behind it, right? If the developers say over the next six to 12 months, I'm expecting to use this much storage and this much compute because it's aligned to these business objectives, how do we make sure that's what ends up happening and that the developers aren't spinning up extra environments without the right discipline behind it. So that's a part of governance as well. Excellent, well great framework, my buff. Thanks very much, we got to leave it there.  Absolutely, it was my pleasure. Thank you, David, thank you Peter. You're welcome. All right, keep it right there, but we'll be back with our next guest. We're live from HPE Discover, Madrid 2017. This is theCUBE.


If you look at a building like this one, and governments, I will often say, you know, government helped build this building with your tax dollars we invested in making this incredible space to teach people. And of course, this is what a strong economy builds. But it's the people in the building who build the strong economy. It's the students who come out with a world-class education who go on to create the opportunities for the future. If faculty, and goodness knows, Okanagan College has some of the best faculty you will find anywhere in Canada. It's the faculty that are committed to passing on that knowledge and creating a sense of appetite for innovation and imagination, initiating that spark of curiosity that each of us have, but sometimes we need to rediscover. That is what builds a strong economy. I'm being taught by business professionals from skill sets within the regions that they work. I'm not being taught from a textbook, but from business experts, owners, and mentors. I'm being taught by the people that are still connected to their profession in their community. My name is Drew Vincent, and I'm proud of the legacy that this school has built. And 50 years later, our little college in the Okanagan is recognized and respected across this country for living its mission of transforming lives and communities. And I am living proof. Thank you very much.


Fast mail is the mail provider that I use and I Their spam filtering is fantastic because not only do they have sort of a generic spam filter like like most mail providers do They also let you configure your own spam filter And it is very trainable Unlike Google's where you know you move a message out of the spam folder and then the next one that matches that just goes right back That's not what happens with fast mail.


Tämä on se, miten se on tehty tänään. Täältä oma hämme. Täältä oma hämme. Täältä oma hämme. Can you imagine, or do you know, how it feels? It hurts. 8.5 % of world population is suffering diabetes. And the number is increasing. This means that big part of us is injecting insulin every day. The good news is that we have insulin. Insulin is a peptide hormone. And peptides are very good drugs with low toxicity. But they degrade in stomach. Which means that we cannot take them as a pill, but we need these old-fashioned injections. Skin consists of several layers. And in order to penetrate them all, we need quite a long needle. This needle is hitting the nerves and causing the pain. And the pain decreases people's willingness to take the medicine. So we don't want to change the drug. But maybe we can change the way to deliver it. And my idea is to use poros, silicon, nano needles. These nano needles would penetrate only the outermost layer of the skin. Which actually is the most effective barrier. But they do not cause pain. They would be poros so that we can load the drug inside the needle before the use. And actual use would be as simple as applying a blaster. In addition we are using silicon. Which means that we can have electrical control to the system. And maybe in future we can have the sensing also to the same device. I have research plan ready. In University of Turku we have excellent and unique facilities for making poros biomaterials. In addition we know how the surface charge affects the peptide loading and release. I have already contacted a collaborator in London and he is very willing to help me with this project. I would love to go there to make these needles because they have top notch micro fabrication facilities and they can help me to test these needles in living system. So I want to take the pain away from peptide injections. I have everything ready. And in order to show that this can work only the funding is needed. So what if instead of long needle we had this. Thank you. That was awesome. Perfect. So just before we go over to the judges. Which remind the audience actually the judging criteria they are really looking for here. So for the scholar award they are looking for the most novel, scientifically ambitious and society relevant ideas. And of course how well they've pitched and communicated here today. So over to the judges. Guys please ask questions. Mari. Thank you Martin very much for the good presentation. I would like to ask that how are the IPRs of these needles than if you have collaborator in London. So have you been thinking that how to protect this? Yes we've been thinking about it a little bit and in London they have some IPRs processes going on but we are not quite there yet. So we need to study it a little bit more and meanwhile do the IPR processing also. Great. Then Vince you have a question. I was wondering how is the drug loaded on these needles and whether or not you are thinking about the storage place for the drug in the silicone micro needles. How do you load the drug there? So the idea there is that there is a film we can make Poro's film on below those needles also. So we can load the drug there and there is a lot of Poro's volume. So empty volume basically inside those needles what we can use. And we just put from the solution we put the peptide inside the needles. I actually had quite similar question. We actually invested in a company out of University of Waterloo that's commercializing micro needles and I think, I'm not sure if it's, where the true difference is actually that's using patches for testing biomarkers from the interstitial fluid in the skin. So I understand the taking out something from the skin just because of the physics of it, because of the capillary. But I don't understand how you push something in there because of how you put something in the blood. How you actually put, does it make sense? And also second question, I'll just use my time. We have to move on. We can talk later. Thank you so much.


Alright, here we go guys 2022 Donna's an impeccable football hobby two box mixture number 10 random team style I'll let you look at the results right here. Thanks for joining everybody. Good luck not gonna recap this one It's gonna be pretty quick or a few minutes behind. I'd like to make up a little bit of time here This will be a quick one just a two boxer. Good luck everybody Donna's hobby first Heck yeah, David at least you get the excitement And you can hear something we have to have it on mute regardless, so but we have subtitles, so I guess All the sub-pattles are kind of getting in the way sometimes Peer strong junior rated rookie got elite series Michael or legends series Michael Vick wrote of the Super Bowl Patrick My Homes and red press proof Josh Jacobs Travis Jones rated rookie the rookies James Cook for Buffalo Great Iron Kings Drake London Falcons rookie and press proof red rated rookie Derek singly Texans It's almost over Bonte Wyatt God Derek Brown no name variation Panthers Naji Harris elite series Eric Weddle Rams champion right there, so I I forget that I've got he was like, you know what? It's December. I'm ready to play football for the team that is gonna go into the Super Bowl All pro kinks max Crosby Raiders patch card number to 100 T Higgins elite series Waddle and press proof red rated rookie David O'Jabbo Sauce gardener rated rookie for the Jets The rookies Bailey zappy Patriots Kenneth Walker the third camps rated rookie for the Seahawks press proof red Isaiah Simmons Fadarian Mathis a Santa dude a Santa would be awesome T Higgins power plus straight Lance and press proof red Eric Kendricks Breeze Hall rated rookie Dominators to Sean Watson Peyton Manning single Terry Quay Walker rated what rated wookie Be a good Star Wars car 2049 John met you the third rated rookie Otto for the Texans When we had more wookie characters and Star Wars Me miss me miss speaking like that like happens like once or twice a night now too many words too many words to be said Wookie waited wookie New York Giants That's just how their accent is actually Cooper cup How they would say George Pickens canvas rated rookie for the Steelers and press roof Kaderious Tony to 100 for the Giants Not more than last year rant. Yeah, forest fired really a John Todd's and rated rookie. No, no no tougher than last year the rookies George Pickens aided Hutchinson rated rookie and a Steve Young Last night in a 12 and a 12 12 boxes. We pulled two downtown's the other Yeah, yesterday during 12 boxes. I pulled two night moves. So you just don't always get a downtown sometimes This is a night move. Sometimes it's a great iron marvels, but the SSPs are just as common as they were It's like to a case it seems like yeah Kenny Pickett or around there Jones Team power wins it Khalil Shakir Dominators McCaffrey rookie Kenny Pickett great iron Kings and Walter Jones press-proof gold to 50 for the Seahawks Seeping pole one of these last few packs here. Come on Santa.  I Still have to see violent night. I haven't seen it yet Tom Brady action all pros Drake London rated rookie canvas and a purple Kenneth game. Well number two two ninety one for the Eagles Has anyone seen violent night, I think it's on peacock right now I Might watch it. I don't know when but I might red press Trivnik Bosa for the Niners Grand Theft Alvarado game winner. Oh nice Serian Davis price I Didn't see who hit it. I just I'm celebrating aqueous test Dak Prescott worth watching for sure Yeah, it seems like it's pretty solid Yeah, since I will never get injured and I mean Dude, Santa's been a part of my life since the beginning, you know Press proof read jok. We should core Moa. You start having like a over under for presents delivered each year That's a stats Howl souls visited all of them Lumps of coal more and more by the year now No metal bar card. I see a monster in here All right, Gabriel Davis 18 a 50 base parallel for the bills and to a number 39 of 75 for the dolphins As well as Carson Wentz two of ten commanders Vikings rookie Otto Lewis scene five of 35 Elegance patch auto Pats drew Bledsoe 70 of 75 or color patch on the dual Bledsoe cool Bledsoe Redemption Cooper Cup immense patch auto Rams Out of you pretty sweet Rams combo spot hit to I believe yeah, Kristen s Chargers master strokes auto lance all worth 12 of 25 and on the back is Elegance patch and helmet rookie Otto Chris Olave 9 of 75 Saints congrats to the Saints There we go nice box of impeccable there. Thanks again, everybody We've got another Don Russ and impeccable mixer coming next


All right ladies and gentlemen welcome on back to wrap it up not just for this day Not just for this week not just for this month But of course for the entire calendar year of 2023 great to see all our students and members alike inside our live trading room for those That's still sticking with us. I know that Tiago just left before I thought I saw a few more of us Just split like a banana a moment ago great to see bill mark Jeff At least a few of our students joining us here and perhaps a few more of us otherwise in social media facebook live the LinkedIn Twitter YouTube etc Let's see how long you have me for here in this meeting because actually earlier today to wrap up my calendar year It's a major internet issues Spectrum you got to love them They always tell you when they restore the internet, but they don't tell you that the internet goes out to big Yeah Not only that the Jack your bill up 30 bucks without telling you so without further ado Let's hop into this meeting here FLJ up like 48 to 50 percent as I'm talking and I mean also looking at the daily chart here for the meantime There doesn't seem to be too much historical Resistance to work with here. So it's a nice trade. I got a bit of an iceberg You could even see that on my level three on the trade station matrix right there at 215 So yeah, I mean hey easily enough just to put this on our watch list to begin FLJ For those of us still with us you're heading into the clothes Well, hey, I mean hopefully you could find a runner and this looks pretty good to begin I don't expect many of us to have been actively trading this year thus far because hey for Friday We normally don't expect to be as aggressive, especially from like 12 p.m. To 2 p.m. So no if you were in this from earlier if you're in it right now kudos to you But that's where I say hey for the next 90 minutes. Can there be more? Possibly that I mean hey for now. We'll definitely put this on our list to begin Now though what we'll do is really just go right from top to bottom Otherwise, of course, we'll talk about the crypto mining stocks here in just a bit They had a bit of a pullback with the market today Pop this up on my screen here as well, which I normally like to show at least the spy So on the bottom of my five-minute chart you could see the spy ticker. That's just the stock market Essentially just dropping off early on today You know I was told that there was a bunch of options expiring today But you know that we already went through that that was already a couple weeks ago for the quadruple witching triple witching Whatever that was right? I mean that was just monthly yearly quarterly whatever so I Think it could just be profit-taking given how much we did move up just from the last month and a half But I think that we're gonna see more of a run over time So, you know whether it be this afternoon or next week as we go into 2024 So hopefully we do see that but hey, we'll go from top to bottom here. See what else we could add to our list This is where Dyslexia kicks in I'm telling you I swear just obviously I say it with truth just every day in our trading room But it's for this reason you tend to see stocks that have the same You know symbols that have similar tickers near each other on the gainers list This happens so frequent. So you got s n t g up a hundred eighty two percent Then you got s x t c get it s and the t there in the same The G and the C look pretty similar, right? So yeah, s n t g Stock popped up pretty nicely earlier on today from two up towards like eight basically a four x there, right? So no beautiful run up, but now this thing's selling off. So we're gonna pass on it for right now S x t c same deal, you know popped up earlier this morning and pre-market at least there and then same fate Now this cga was flying on upward it actually kind of jumped above the s x t c as I was recapping them So cga nice pop here as we just kind of get to this one out. This is China green a g ink That's the name of the company in the watermark there. So yeah, hey, we said it earlier today as well This is the type of day time the day as well where we're gonna see a lot of these like really low float really small cap stocks make a pop and Very few of them end up being like very strong day trades over a period of time So this is popped up nice I'm gonna put this on our list because it is good timing with this meeting and nice trend so far The order book is really bad though. So if this shakes back down 20 30 40 cents within a blink of an eye Don't be surprised there This why CBD trade has been a tease for years, I mean it's in the name CBD So if you're familiar with that and like thought oh you see that make a strong move up Maybe with like the pot stocks over time or the more CBD becomes commercialized like a pop Well, maybe certain companies, but this thing has been taken a licking basically since 2021 and even before then So it's another short squeeze doc ended up popping up pretty nicely today in pre-market, but big red candle here for now, so 80 TX same fate Astr not terrible. I mean it's moving inch and slowly back up to the view up price there But not a great need to add that here at this point FSR this was a little disappointing at least, you know Pushed up a little nicely at first But really wanted a lot more out of this trade and it gave us next to nothing So, you know from really like 184 183 price it pushed up to maybe 193 it's like 10 cents worth But when you're looking for an extra seven cents and you're not trying to get out at 193 And then the thing pulls back a little bit.  I guess towards that area 183 184 resistance now But for right now, I'm gonna pass here. I'm not really too tempting just yet All right, you got POL former runner actually C4 ended up pushing up yesterday. We were covering that in class So just to check it on that one for the time being, you know popped up pretty nicely earlier today pulled back here POL already making that same move just across the given day here So give me a quick sec here There we go got a love in your home offices right outside your right Uh, you have a nice window up at your home office and you got someone blasting music from the car right outside your home office That's lovely All right, let's see what else we can grab you're heading into the clothes though Again, we'll jump back to the crypto mining stocks like Riot Mara, etc in just a bit. Oh Oh speaking of which, you know in traders dyslexia and whatnot remember we had sing just on the gainers list as well Just yesterday CING a little alongside that it was also SING for for a little blip there So I guess SING up 9% today All right, so I really don't see if there's anything It's not really much else that looks that great here on the gainer side Not nothing really looking like a familiar name towels the only thing that I just want to click on briefly But this thing is really flat now across the afternoon almost looks like a buyout actually, but I don't think it is I think just the China markets just at this point Heading into the new year as well, of course just flat at this stage So let's actually get to some of the miners here in the meantime actually will jump to the losers list next but Mara, I mean it's down 15% is it possible for this to squeeze upward into the clothes Absolutely actually I do think that there's a great case to see that not just because old Josh here likes the Bitcoin stacks But if you recall When stacks like Mara and Riot heading into this time of the day are either at the highs or lows They really don't make continued moves like every time Mara is at 15% we put on the watch list Does it really make that like dollar to dollar pop higher? No, and that's what we've been saying for a long time Well, you stopped her down 15% today, or they is likely to continue to squeeze lower I don't think so. I don't think so and with that Mara could be more tradable here heading into this afternoon with that in mind and Riot and this is the only stock I am in right now as a trade Just one of our students Tiago is in and out of this from earlier today, too I believe he was watching it just before he yields a split a moment ago But you know just I was chatting with him I was saying to you folks in the chat board as well. I said, hey, let's see if we can get 1555 to 1560 to act as support So it shook around for a little bit not really my cup of tea to like follow this for 30 minutes flat But if it's not gonna break lower then there was a case to see that squeeze up So specifically for Riot Mara, I mean, that's what we were kind of just calling out CLSK, I'm sure you're gonna see this across the board then with the other Mining stocks out there, but Riot and Mara have always been the two most active of them And you know, I favor Mara more than you know, Riot at times, but I like riot it every now and then so I add both to our List here for potential squeezes So those two really the others I don't really have as much of a focus on let's just go down the loser side here though For right now see if there's anything else looking good Everything you're hard to borrow got a bunch of stocks are down like, you know, 30% nearly 27% this these two obviously down big GMM pass. There's our cat-and-trade Bitcoin mining stock I think we just flashed that just a moment ago and there's our CLSK. There's our Mara and all the others AAOI stock dropped off like really nicely earlier today. This guy clobbered. Wow from 22 down a 17 fifth or 18 basically you'll call it Pretty sharp move down The stock we've done pretty well on in the past just back when it was a bit cheaper It's moved up and not that it's too expensive, but with the move up the order book has thinned out a lot So it's not always the most tradable stock nowadays this AAOI just because of liquidity, but it could be a fun one All right, so hey that was quick that was brief, but that's for a reason, right?  So I like what we got We got a decent list here at this point So if there is anything else that I missed let me know I mean there could be one or two That's popping right now suddenly you never know love to see it check Benzinga pro our trusty scans here So maybe there could be there's our FLJ. That one's already on our list. Oh, you need is one really Astr I don't think that was looking that great before so It's Joe it's trying to inch up so that's the one that we said was like kind of like near the VWAP price It didn't look terrible You know didn't have a great need to put it on our list just at the time and well It's trying to pop up a little bit more for the for the time being and over the VWAP if we could at least hold here Then I wouldn't mind putting more of a focus on it All right, so you let me know unless if there's anything else looking twice as good as this I think this will be the last one. I'll slip on our watch list here at the bottom ASTR But I'd like right and Mara more for the dead cat bounce to move back up FLJ just I mean that's looking pretty sharp here right now and a couple more like we said So folks without further ado Hey, just got to do my housekeeping first and foremost if you're new to new to this YouTube channel new to our social media streams and Platforms just look to at us. Just go right to YouTube Especially at cyber trading you hit the notification bell icon right there subscribe as I say be a friend tell a friend look to spread The good word of cyber trading University But hey to you and your own to you and yours you and your family happy and healthy new year to our students Of course most importantly like Grant Bill Margaret had John before Lewis Lawrence Ray Jeff Mark and all our students otherwise You know, we've been saying all across our holiday season here How thankful we are to all of our students just to be a part of cyber trading University? It's not just the education that myself and Fausta provide to you But it's the camaraderie and energy that you bring to us and you know just all that together We make for a great team and you know just again happy and healthy new year to you and your family We are so grateful for you to be a part of us. So with that said folks. Hey, we got about 75 more minutes. Hey, we're not done just yet.  We'll be good to go. All right folks But hey best of luck trading if you're not joining us in our trading room again We look forward to seeing you next week into 2024 Of course with that in mind the market is closed on Monday New Year's Day And we will be back on Tuesday. All right folks take care


Greetings and welcome to the Introduction to Astronomy. In this lecture we are going to talk about different types of galaxies that we see in the universe and how they have been classified. But let's start off looking at how galaxies were discovered. Well when were galaxies discovered? Well as early as the 1700s it was suggested that they might be similar to our Milky Way and might be other galaxies. But it really was not known. They were called the spiral nebulae and there was a great debate as to whether they were part of our Milky Way galaxy and nebulae like other types of nebulae that we see. And as late as 1924 astronomers were very divided as to what these spiral nebulae were. Were they part of our galaxy or were they external galaxies like our Milky Way? In 1925 Hubble announced the discovery of Cepheid variables in Andromeda. That meant he could calculate the distance and found out that they were definitely not part of the Milky Way. They were much too distant. Now Hubble also worked on a classification scheme for galaxies and he classified them based on their appearance. So what did they look like? Now that's not all that difference than how stars were originally classified based on the appearance of their spectra. Now what we saw here was that there were elliptical galaxies on one arm of the classification and those are ellipticals and then that split into spiral and barred spiral galaxies. Spiral galaxies forming one arm here and barred spirals splitting apart. There were some similarities between the different types of spiral galaxies. And we had the S0 or lenticular galaxies which were kind of the border in between those and the irregular galaxies which really didn't fit any other classification. So let's take a look at each of these types of galaxies and what do we see? We see spiral galaxies and they have a very distinct spiral or pinwheel type structure. They consist like our galaxy of the disk, a central bulge, a halo and the spiral arms. These have ongoing star formation so are currently forming stars and they have emission nebulae and open clusters of stars that show that star formation is occurring. So we can see the pink color of hydrogen regions there and the bluish color of the overall of the spiral arms which show that stars have to be forming currently in these galaxies. They also have a population of old stars in the bulge and halo of the galaxy. So star formation has occurred over an extended period of time. So if we were formed stars long ago these galaxies are still forming stars today. Now similarly we have the barred spiral galaxies. This is what our Milky Way is. They have a similar properties to what we call normal spiral galaxies with the difference being the bar running through the center of the galaxy. So instead of the spiral arms going straight down to the center there seems to be a bar of stars through the middle and the spiral arms seem to pick up off the end of that bar. About two thirds of spiral galaxies have a bar. So while we call them normal and barred spirals it's the barred spirals that are actually the more common galaxy. The reason for the bar is still something we do not know. That's a big question mark as to why some of these galaxies form a bar and others do not. So how can we classify spiral galaxies? Well they are given the letter S to represent spiral or SB to represent a barred spiral. So that divides them as spiral and spiral with a bar and then we use the lower case letters A to C after the S or the SB. So you'd have SA, SB, and SC proceeding this way across the diagram and SBA, SBB, and SBC proceeding down on the lower arm. Those with the A mean that they have the largest bulge and the most tightly wound spiral arms. Those with the C classification would have the smallest bulge and the least tightly wound spiral arms. So you see that how tightly wound the spiral arms are for an SA and how wide open they are for an SC. And of course an SB would then be in between those. Our Milky Way would be classified as an SB for barred spiral and a lower case B. It's intermediate. It's not very tightly wound but it's not wide open as well. The next type of galaxy we want to look at are the elliptical galaxies. Elliptical galaxies are called that because they have an ellipsoidal or spherical shape. Although they are squashed spheres. And there is no trace, none of a spiral arms or a disc in these galaxies. They also have no dust, no young population 1 stars, and no emission nebulae. So none of the things that we talked about with spiral galaxies that showed that they had current star formation. These galaxies had star formation long ago and have not had star formation for billions of years. They come in a wide range of sizes from giant ellipticals which are the largest galaxies in the universe to dwarf ellipticals which are among the smallest galaxies in the universe. Now how do we classify an elliptical galaxy? Well they are given the letter E for an elliptical galaxy and these are given the number 0 through 7 to specify how squashed the galaxy appears. So an E0 is a spherical galaxy and an E7 is an ellipsoidal shape about the thickness of say an American football. So they are much flatter but not near as flat as you would expect in a disc galaxy. A disc galaxy would be far flatter than these. Now how about the other types of galaxies that we look at? We have irregular galaxies as you may guess from the name do not have any regular shape. But they do have cold gas and dust meaning that they have star formation. Like a spiral galaxy they have population 1 and population 2 stars and they are classified as IRR for irregular galaxies. They can be further subdivided but we are not going to go into that detail here. And then finally we have the lenticular galaxies. Lenticular galaxies are an interesting combination of both spiral and elliptical galaxies. They are classified as either S0 or SB0 meaning yes they can have a bar, the S meaning not spiral in this case but referring to the fact that they are a disc galaxy. So they are sort of a combination as to how they are named as well. They are disc galaxies with no cold gas and no dust meaning no star formation in these. So they would look in terms of their stellar populations like an elliptical galaxy. But their shape is closer to that of a spiral galaxy. So they are a very different type of galaxy. Now how do galaxies evolve? How do they change over time? Well perhaps originally this was thought to be an evolutionary sequence that galaxies might go from one to another. You might be able to imagine an elliptical galaxy compacting down into a disc galaxy and then somehow developing perhaps spiral arms. Now that was what was originally thought although we now know that this could not happen. So where is an elliptical galaxy going to find cold gas and dust to become a spiral? There is a big difference in terms of the properties and star formation. Can a spiral un-collapse to become an elliptical? Could you instead go this direction to the left on the diagram? That's hard to think of although it's quite possible that two spiral galaxies in a massive collision could end up forming an elliptical galaxy. A spiral galaxy on itself will not evolve into an elliptical nor will an elliptical evolve into a spiral. So we do believe that galaxies evolve but they evolve through collisions not just on their own. They will pretty much remain whatever shape they currently happen to be. So let's go ahead and finish up with our summary. And what we've looked at this time is that galaxies are classified by their appearance and we gave five types. The spiral, the spiral, the barred spiral, the elliptical, the irregular and the lenticular. Each of these types is divided into subclasses and we discussed galaxy evolution as being caused by collisions between galaxies that cause them to merge together. So that concludes this lecture on galaxy types. We'll be back again next time for another topic in astronomy. So until then, have a great day everyone and I will see you in class.