best, man. I guess. Yeah, it's all South Eastern Asian dishes are all very, very similar. All bar from each other. Five out of 10, down to the middle jazz. Jersey Card Sons, Chris Paul, number 73 of 99. Game used for the Sons there. Massive Rookie Patch Card. Zyre Williams Grizzlies, yeah, 19 to 25. Immaculate Ink, Evan40A, Nix, 14 to 49. Three Color Patch Auto Pistons, Adrienne Dantley, three of 10. That's pretty cool. Game Ward Patch Card Pistons, Adrienne Dantley to 10. With the auto. Now we've got Red RPA Lakers, Austin Reeves, Sander with the Lakers. Great Reeves. He's having a good season. There we go. We'll get that. Magda, of course. Nice Red RPA Reeves. Give me just a moment, guys, and we'll do this recap. Does the food court at the mall count? There, I mean, it's possible there's decent Thai places at like a mall, but I just wouldn't, I wouldn't expect that. Well, like, because... Like the Altamont Mall or something? Yeah, they have, I forget what place it is, but they, I don't think it's... It's possible, I'm going to assume no, Donny. I forget what it's called. We will show you the way. I don't know who we is, maybe it's just me. Maybe it's just Chinese. Maybe I'm the only person that likes Thai food here. All right, Relics, here we got Zyre Williams, Chris Paul, Herbert Jones, Chris Middleton, Donovan Mitchell, Keldon Johnson, Pascal Siakam, Quentin Grimes, Shreve Cooper, got Miles Turner, Autos, now we had Adrian Dantley-Pistons, Evan Forniea-Nicks, Derek Fisher, Scotty Lewis, Wendell Carter Jr., Latrell Sprewell, Devontae Graham for the Pelicans, Greg Brown III, Rookie Patch Auto Redemption Blazers, Devontae Graham again, got Prime Patch Auto Gold Redemption, Nix, Miles McBride, that'll be a sweet one. Nice McBride, to 10. We had Red RPA Lakers, Austin Reeves, 7 to 49. Rookie Introductions, Bones Highland Auto for the Nuggets to 99. Shadow Box Signatures, Zion Williamson, Pelicans to 75. RPA Warriors, was Moses Moody to 99. And we had that Paul Gasol Award Winners Auto, Number 2 49 for the Grizzlies. And I'll do it. Thanks again, everybody. We've got football coming up now. What's the price point on Thai food? It's just about the same as like a Chinese restaurant.  Yeah, that's all right. Like pineapple fried rice is probably around there. Like 40 dollars for two. Normal meal. I'll say normal meal you would go out to eat for.  Right. Two must-own stock in Chipotle or something. He is always eating that. I mean, I'd probably be in the same boat, but that we get a pricey after a little bit. That's the thing. Don't get the drink. Drink water. That just closed out the, I did. Dang it. Yeah. Green curry, I think is my favorite as well. Good balance of sweet and savory. Got to get it spicy for sure though. Time for some Funkadelics. Column nice three. All right, let's do the random now. Four 2022 Illusions football hobby, eight bucks number 13, random team style. Here we go. Happy Friday, Matthew. Good luck. Eight times four and four. Yeah, that's how I teach Chipotle is like you get good food. It's a little expensive for the flavor, but it's dependable. Eight times on the names. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight. Eric P down to Richard B and eight times on the teams. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight. Dallas down to Miami. I had some of the best barbecue I've ever had yesterday. It's called Nessos. It's an Okowi. Dude, it's not, I wouldn't even call it a restaurant. It's just the food truck. Not even. It's like a little building I walked into. It's like an old house.  They just like leave. Amazing though. Like it would legitimately really good. Anyway, Eric P Cowboys, Jonathan S Chiefs, Taylor B Chargers, Greg B Vikings, Russell B Falcons, Jonathan S Texans, Richard B Steelers, Kenny S Jags, Kyle F Colts, Chad H Giants, Tiffany H Bengals Raiders, Glen C Packers, William H Bears Rams, Andrew A Bills, Matthew R Eagles, Paul F Lyons, Michael T Commanders, Mike I Saints, Matthew W Bucks, Nick S Broncos Cardinals, Paul F Niners, Michael T Titans, Joe L Jets, Colin R Browns Panthers, Sam A Seahawks, Michael T Patts, Kyle T Ravens, and Richard B Dolphins. Get those results posted. We'll start in a couple minutes here. Tim, I don't know what you're talking about. Like after I eat a bowl of Chipotle, like I am stuffed. Yeah, Chipotle is like it's like a two meal. Like one bowl is like a two meal thing for me. Yes, the thing. Like if you eat Chipotle and you're not like. Then again, I get a bowl though with like rice and beans and meat and veggies and salt. Yeah, I don't know about the other stuff. I've never actually gotten, I've gotten a burrito there. I've never gotten anything else from there. Yeah, same. But like, unless I'm going out like, I don't know, like doing something like physical activity or whatever, like a one bowl is probably going to be cool for the day. Realistically, yeah, maybe a snack. But yeah, like as far as meals go, yes. That's how I feel anyway. Yeah, no, I agree. Like the amount of Taco Bell I ate today, that's like that was like my one meal. Yeah. That's how I see it.  Oh, well, what are you going to do?  Now we'll keep picking up donuts around here, man. Yeah, stop getting donuts every, every, every day, two days. Pizza, the other days. I don't, I don't need this place to give me doughnuts or pizza. I can do that my whole time. That's what I'm saying.  Circle K, they're good. Yeah. All right, y'all, let's get started here. Everybody forced here ripping 2022 illusions football hobby, eight bucks over 13 random team style. Results can always be found at latesportscards.com. Thanks for joining everybody. Good luck. Exactly, CJ. There's, there's truth to that. Hey, what's up, Joey? There's truth to that for sure.  Break and attest the circle K's doughnuts. So that's why. No, I wasn't, I was just questioning. I was like, okay, really? No, because I forget who I told that. They're like, how could you like circle K over like racetrack or a Krispy Kreme? Like, okay, Krispy Kreme is different, but like. I haven't had a fresh Krispy Kreme doughnut. Oh, that's, okay, that's different. But anyway, like, yeah, I don't know. Most, most gasation doughnuts. That's why I'm skeptical. That's why I was like, oh really? All right, Niners, Tyrion Davis Price, RPA, first pack to $299. Lamar Jackson, three at $50 on the Operation Detonation. Cool looking card for the Ravens. You got a purple J-Rod out of the, the hit list pack? Got Drake London, Rookie to $499 for the Falcons. It happens, it happens. Mystique James Cook. The one guy hit that one looked short for Ronaldo. Allusions number 13, I have only one Matthew W. and a Matthew R. There are no Matthew M's in this break. Yeah, let me see if there's somewhere else. No, it's not a typo. Looks like you're number 14. Looks like you're in the next one. There's no, there's no Matthew M in this one. I'm looking at the sheet right now. Yeah, everything's correct here. Looks like you're in the next one. Whoa, one of four. Funkadelic, Aaron Rodgers Otto. Whoa, Packers Funkadelic, man. That one's worth a Funkadelic. There you go, Glenn C. There he is, future Jets or something? I don't know. You get some awesome power sound bites. Funkadelic is pretty funny on an Aaron Rodgers card, honestly, bro to $399 for the Bengals. It's not your mention. Yeah, that card fits him. Who needs, yeah, you don't need Sammy Gummy to say a Funkadelic. 600 points. I'm only going to say it for a card like that. Sam says we're like all of them. Rookie Ritter to $1.99 for the Falcons. We've got a Illusionist, Justin Jefferson, Vikings to $1.99. Rika, tick, tick, soft card to Rookie Jersey or the Jets. Aaron, Aaron Rodgers is amazing. This is random team style break. So every price was the same. St. Salvin Camarita, $4.99, Mystiques and Mirror White. All good, Matthew. No harm done at all. Wanda Robinson, Rookie Jersey for the Jets. Daven Cook. Rika, heroes, Justin Herbert. Oh, nice. First box you open in the case has the case hit. Wow, man, what a box. What a box. Chargers of the case hit. Hollow heroes, Justin Herbert, soft card to $3.99 for the Jets and Mystique Rookie Hassan Haskins to $3.99. Titans, $109.99 random teams, Illusions, 8 bucks. It's amazing. Chief Skymore, Incident Impact, Rookie Jersey. Amazing, Matt Stafford. Hey, Donald, how you doing, man? Pickens there. T. Higgins to $1.99. Bangles to $3.99. Commanders, Mystique Rookie Jahan Dotson. Saints, Crystal Lave on the Rookie Auto to $75. New Orleans, nice one. Shining Stars, Justin Jefferson. The OG Funkadelic would have been a... Who was the guy that threw the no-hitter on acid? It's $4.99. Tarnal Mooney, Bears. Joe Burrow to $2.99. Bangles, King of Cards. Or Bill Walton. Yeah, yeah, there you go, Vaughn. Matt Corral, Panthers. Rookie Endorsements, Auto to $35. You go, Panthers. I don't see... I just don't see the Niners going out and getting a veteran quarterback. They're better off honestly just spending money on other positions at this point because they have Perdy who is playing well and then you even have Lance as your backup going in the next season. So they should not bring in... The money should be spent elsewhere for them. Elijah Moore, number to $35 for the Jets. Funkadelic, Drew Brees. Titan's, Traylon Burks on the Rookie. Black Ice, Auto to $3.25. You go, Saints. Jonathan Taylor. T. Will's being the Grizzlies tonight, huh? Grizzlies look rough without Adams. To $4.99. Tyler Lockett, Seahawks. To $1.99. Aaron Rodgers, Funkadelic Packers. There he is again. I just don't think Aaron Rodgers is going to retire either way. Rookie Jumbo Jersey Falcons, Desmond Ritter. Damien Pierce. He's got a... That's a big contract. To $3.99. Cooper Cup Rams. And Illusionist, Javonte Adams. Well, I mean that scenario, okay, I get it. Yeah, I think... I mean, he's likely to end up on the Jets or like... I mean, even the Titans could make a move for him. I just... I don't know. The Raiders, of course. I mean, teams that have okay rosters and that just want to win, really. Mystique, Sauce Gardner. Oh, that's a Mosaic Mystique. That was really tough to spot from here. Turn it around. Very easy to spot. Mosaic, Sauce Gardner Mystique. I wish it was more parents on the front. It's really... I mean, it's the design. It's not that... It's the Mosaic's fault. Very nice. That's awesome. There you go, Jets. Bailey Zappi, First Impressions. RPA to 25 Pats. That's a $4.99 Derek Carr Raiders. Illusionist, Kenny Pickett Steelers. I agree with that, Taylor. I hope he retires. I think basically everybody is tired of Aaron Rodgers. Calvin Austin, the third. Steelers, Rookie Endorsements. Auto to 50 with the Green Ink. I think it's like 95% of the people that want Aaron Rodgers to retire. Maybe more. Maybe more. Do they still own Bear's fans? Kirk Cousins, 3x9 Vikings. Steak, Wondale Robinson. No, Brett Favre's still worse. Brett Favre committed a felony. A big one. Amazing, Tom Brady. 400 points, ran it to everybody at the ends. James Cook. Yeah, Aaron Rodgers is a dolphin, so it'd be kind of funny. Yellow Diamond, T. Higgins-Bangles, the 299. Funkadelic, Dan Marino-Dolphins, the 399. Did he not get charged? I mean, that's crazy. Is he gonna? Cook Brothers, dual jersey. Bill's Vikings, random at the ends. It's $4.99 Mike Evans for the Bucks. DeAndre Swift-Lions on the pass card, $63.75. Rodgers is a good quarterback. He's still in above average quarterback. He can lead a team to winning. The Packers are better down the stretch this year. Even if he went back to the Packers, they'd be a fine team next year, push for that division. But I think everyone's just tired of him. That's all I'm saying. James Williams-Rickett at 399 for the Lions. Mystique Christian-Watson-Packers at 299. Hey, what's up, Frederick? Definitely not saying Rodgers' talent. He's taking a small step back, but he's still a good quarterback. But his head and heart gotta be in it, though. And are they? Skymore to 175, Chiefs. Mystique, Kenny Pickett, Steelers. Sometimes it doesn't feel like it. Yeah, it doesn't look like it sometimes, but I'm not gonna wait on that. I'm just saying, is it? Ravens, David O'Jabbo, Rookie Otto to 99. Rookie signs. I don't even know. I don't even want to know, Frederick. You may be tired just talking about something like that. Like seven year time? Mac Jones to 499, Pats. To 199, Illusionist, Desmond Ritter, Rookie Falcons. Bradshaw and Pickett, Dual Jersey Steelers. He didn't sleep at all. Oh my God, what the heck, man? That's crazy. I wouldn't say Packers' offense was all and all. You want to watch it awful. Check out the Bears or the Titans without Tannihill. To 399, Ezekiel Ali at Cowboys. Or the Atlanta Falcons. Felix Jones Jr., Rookie Jersey card for the Bears. I think from expectations standpoint, it was awful. Yeah. It's 199, Kenneth Walker, the third Seattle. To 299, Illusionist, Tyree Kale for the Dolphins. Yeah, like the Packers would be fine team next year. Like they'd probably make the playoffs in the NFC. They'd make the right moves. Like they probably should have been in the playoffs more than the Bucks. Or the Seahawks, honestly. Like down the stretch, like at that time, they were better than the Bucks and the Seahawks. Austin Eckler Otto to 35 for the Chargers. Their defense had gotten better. They had shrunk some ice games together. Their receivers were actually catching passes. The running game had got going a bit. They were making it work. The early in the season, they were brutal. That's fair. Early in the season, they were just terrible. To 499, Kenan Allen Chargers. To 399, Mystique Rookie, Pierre Strong Jr. Patriots. Would they have to trade for Sean Payton? Drake London, Rookie Otto for the Falcons. 15 of 75. There'll be no London on this track. Sean Payton, day one checklist. To raid first round back for Taisal Hill. Dude, trading for a coach just sounds so crazy to me. Yeah, that sounds absurd. Depending on the coach. But like, I mean, the Bucks traded for Gruden and won a Super Bowl. The 399 Tyree killed Dolphins like the year after. But Sean Payton, my good coach, but had Drew Brees as his QB. And didn't even go back to a Super Bowl after they won that one.  Bucks, Kate, Otto, Rookie Otto, number to 199. Like, come on. Is that the coaches one, though? I mean, 15. No, I get that.  A lot of player turnover. You're the same person. To 25, Jiu-Jitsu, Mr. Chiefs. To 299, Colts, Mystique Rookie, Alec Pierce. Yeah. Yeah, he was the Bounty Gate coach, that's for sure. Skymore, Tyree, Kale, Dual Patch. Five of 10 Chiefs. Nice card here. Ejavu, the Bounty Gate thing. Bounty Gate scandal. Oh, yeah. Okay. Debo, Sambino, 499 Niners. Mystique, Bailey, Zappy. Quarter-all Patterson. Falcons, Jersey card. Not the Flakey.  Givante Williams, the 399 Broncos. DK Metcalf, the 399 Funkadelic for the Seahawks. The Rogers Funkadelic was the 4. It was one of one of four. Mark, Gastonow, Jets on the Jersey Auto to 25. Immortal, Immortalized, actually. Jets, Traylon Burks to 75. Titans on the Shining Stars. Yellow Diamond to 299. Michael Pittman Jr. for the Colts. To 50, Mystique, Desmond Ritter, Falcons, Rookie. Jameson Williams, Lyons, Rookie, Auto to 49. There we go. Trayfon Walker. Maybe Rogers just didn't want to sign the fifth card. Is that all I got? Guess we'll go with four? Yeah. There's always exceptions to those things, like vets, I think. It seems like it. Alec Pierce to 199. Colts, Rookie. Zemir White, Raiders, Mystique. Titans, Hassan Haskins, Rookie, Endorsements, Auto to 199. Derek Henry. Black Ice, George Pickens, Rookie. To 50 for the Steelers. That's a pretty cool one. To 299. Mystique Rookie, Pierce, Strong Jr. Patriots. Sausgardner, Richard Sherman, dual patch card for the Jets. And the Seahawks to 75. Random at the end. Rookie, Idols. Kenny Pickett to 499 Steelers now. The Rookie. Illusionist, Jamar Chase. Belish Jones Jr. Rookie, Jumbo Jersey for the Bears. St. Rookie, Chris O'Lavet at 399. Got to 399. Aaron Rogers, Funkadelic again for the Packers. Oh boy, man. All these Funkadelic, Aaron Rogers. Is that the only card he's got? I feel like we haven't seen another card. They knew what they were doing. First impressions. Rookie, Jersey Otto. John Metz, the third for the Texans. 77 of 249. So 50 is an amazing Tom Brady. Bucks, 6 of 50. Yellow Diamond, James C. Williams at 299 Lions. To 299, Austin Eckler, Funkadelic, Chargers. Ikem, Aquonu, Rookie Otto. Panthers to 199. John and Taylor. Of course, it's getting an attack. Let's go, Magic. Of course, I'm not going to say anything to you. 2 out of 399 for the Dolphins here. Funkadelic, John Elway. Peer Strong, Jr. Patriots on the Rookie. Endorsements Otto to 10 with the Purple Ink. There we go. Jamar Chase, Operation Detonation. DK Metz, cap to 199 Seattle. 2, 399. Illusionist Travis Kelsey, Chiefs. Falcons, Desmond Ritter. Rookie, Incident Pack, Jersey, number to 25. Patch card. To 75, Tyree Kill, Dolphins. Illusionist Malik Willis. How did out of bio make that? What was that all about? Sky Moore, Incident Pack, Rookie, Jersey, Chiefs. Sauce Gardner, Rookie to 499 Jets. Got to 299, Texans, Rookie, Mystique. John Metz, the third. Hamilton, first impressions. RPA, 18 of 75. Baltimore. Three-color patch. Rookie, safety there. Rookie, Yellow Diamond, Desmond Ritter to 299 for the Falcons. To 399, King of Cards, Malik Willis, Titans. Hey, Andrew, what's up, buddy? Panthers, Luke, Keekley, Superlatives, Otto to 49. Cool hit, Panthers. Walker.  Yeah, it happens. Happens a lot.  How about do something, though? To 499, Travis E.T. on Junior Jags. Funkadelic, Kyler Murray. Broncos, Drake, Dulcet, Rookie, Otto to 199. Rookie, Aiden Hutchinson to 399 for the Lions. Now we've got to 399. Aiden Hutchinson, Mystique, Lions. Who had to come back, Tim? Who was down? Pickett and Merino, Steelers, Dolphins, Dual Jersey. Random at the end on the Rookie Idols. Yellow Diamond, Russell Wilson to 299, Denver. Yeah, that sounds about right. Shark's defense is Swiss cheese. Plus Canes are a really good team. Really good team. Buccaneers, Chris Godwin, Jersey Card, Highlight, Swatches. Got Najee Harris, 175, Steelers. Now we've got to 199. Cardinals, Rookie, Mystique, Trey McBride. Bears, Darnell Mooney, Superlatives, Otto to 49. Last couple of packs, everybody. We have some randoms to do. It's Illusion, so it's needless to say. Jalen Waddell to 499, Dolphins to 399. Illusionist, Travis Kelsey, Chiefs. Come on, Magic. And Sauce Gardner, Jets, back of the break to 199. Rookie, endorsements, Otto. All right, four randoms here. First one, we've got points, cards. Top two, we're going to get points. Top spot, 600, second spot, 400. Then in this order after that, Steelers, Dolphins, Pickett, Merino, Dual Jersey. Cook Brothers, Bill's Vikings, Dual Jersey. And Jets, Seahawks on the Sauce and Sherman. Good luck on those.  All right, again, top two spots get points here. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and 10. Paul F gets 600. And then Glenn C gets the 400. Let's get to the rest here. Pickett, Merino, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and 10. Let's go with Steelers. I've got the Cook Brothers here. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and 10. Vikings and the Sauce and the Sherman. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and 10. Jets. Classic Sharks, Tim. Classic Sharks. Relics. Chris Godwin, Skye Moore, Desmond Ritter. The Ritter's the 50. Most of these are not numbered. Bielish Jones Jr. Corderole Patterson to 10. We have Skye Moore and Tyree Kill. Bielish Jones Jr., Bradshaw and Pickett. Deandre, Swift to 75. Ritter again. Skye Moore, Wondale Robinson, Sauce Gardener. Autos now, it's Sauce Gardener. Darnell Mooney, Greg Dulcich. Luke Keekley, Kyle Hamilton. Pierre Strong Jr., purple link to 10. Ike Makwonu, John Mechie III, Hassan Haskins. Hey, what's up, Gunner? How are you tonight? Jamison Williams, Mark Gastinot for the Jets there. Kate Aughton, Drake London. Austin Eckler, David O'Jabo. Calvin Austin III, Greene to 50. Bailey Zappi, RPA to 25. Black Ice, Traylon Birx to 25 auto. Matt Corral, Greene to 35. Chris Olaveta, 75. Tyrion Davis Price to 2.99, RPA. And Hollow Hero's case hit, Justin Herbert, Chargers. Congrats on that. And Funkadelic Auto Packers, Aaron Rodgers, one of four. There we go. That'll do it for the break. Thanks again, everybody. The allusion is coming up. Yep, there's gonna be a Super Bowl break this year. 400 boxes. Magic or something, Chopra. Yeah, it just happens like in these situations. They don't have anyone that can completely take over a game. Lock it down. Let's go, Magic. Who would they want that game? Oh, did Rich say that earlier, Tim? He didn't tell me that. You guys always know more than me. What were you saying, Donnie? I was reading chat. Yeah, who's the guy that was supposed to be that guy in Magic? Like the closer, whatever you want to call it. I mean, it'll probably end up being Paloban Karo, but he's still a rookie. So, but he's like the best, probably like one-on-one score on the team. Oh, it's all good, man. It's all good, Matthew. All right, let me type in Ricky. I just, I just, it's, God. It's so funny. Damn it, Donnie. It is.  Hunter? I want it to get like good, like the second season. You know what I mean? But this is kind of all the animated series go. Like there's always a, like filler and, I'm sure it'll pick up and get pretty good.  Someone's gotta die, right? Like, I mean, the whole, the whole clump force is probably gonna die at some point. Not necessarily. What if Hunter dies and then Crosshair takes Hunter's spot and Crosshair is like back to bad batch? Do we do something like that? We're gonna hold Mega at turns in the Hunter. That Crosshair kills Hunter. Oh, and then takes his spot. Welcome to the breast of the batch or like that. Maybe Crosshair will sacrifice himself for them. That's probably what's gonna happen, something like that. I feel like Racker would like overestimate his strength and get killed by something. He's almost done that like twice already. Yeah, it happens. Cole, Cole, Cole. Oh, let's go. Oh, let's go. Random time for 2022. Illusions football hobby, 8 box number 14. Random teams. Good luck, everybody. Three and two, five times. Rich did not say that illegal. I was literally here. Five times here. Names first. One, two, three, four, and five. Joe M. Down to Justin C. And we have five times on the teams. One, two, three, four, and five. Jaguars. Down to Chargers. How many randoms is this? This is a boxer, Donny. I'm gonna say three, including points. Three including points. So I'm gonna say Joe M. Jags. Taylor B. Jets. Joe S. Colts. Matthew M. With the Titans. James F. Browns. Panthers. William H. Giants. Matthew R. Dolphins. Thomas R. Ravens. Ben B. Bengals Raiders. Thomas B. Niners. Thomas R. Bucks. Nelson V. Broncos. Cardinals. Christopher S. Packers. Steven U. Steelers. Joe S. Bills. Thomas R. Seahawks. Mike A. Chiefs. William H. Cowboys. Joe S. Falcons. Sam A. Bears-Rams. Evan R. Lyons. Nelson V. Patriots. Jeremy H. Saints. Joe S. With the Vikings. Craig K. Commanders. Victor O. Texans. William H. Eagles. And Justin C. Chargers. Let's get the results posted. We'll start in a couple minutes here. No. Never retail product. I'll hop in a photo. Yeah, that's good. We don't even have a whole lot of retail right now anyway. We still have some of those 2020 sell-o-pack boxes and some like blasters that we sell in the front of the shop. Like just, we have like very few blasters. Some mosaics and prisms. Yep. Yeah, just a little bit. Maybe I'll rip one. I want to pull a Genesis. 40 or something for 2021? It's only 2021 prism mosaic. We've probably gone up at auction somewhere. That's 40 bucks. That's not bad. Usually we don't buy that. So we must have, someone must have walked up with something like a case at a show or something. Like I don't know. Do they randomly? Maybe it came with something we ordered? I don't know. I don't know. I'll be right back guys. And we're going to get started. I need to get some water. It's four of 10. Cross over rookie patch auto dual booklet. Trevor Lawrence, Mack Jones. AFC South. AFC East. One of two. Nike Saloon. Drew one of a kind. Treasure produced with 14 grams. A 14 carat. A body auto number nine. Blue shimmer. Bukaios. Let's do it. Everybody forced here. Ripping 2022 illusions football hobby. Eight box break number 14. This is a random team style. Thanks everybody for joining. Good luck on the break. Oh yeah. There's room for personals. Greg. There is room. Here we go. Oh magic. Let's go. What are they called? Kickball? Kickball. Foul? What? Oh cool. Looks like he was grabbing. That's what I say. Cap. Oh nevermind. They score off that. Sauce Gardner Jets Incident Impact Rookie Jersey card. Jonathan Taylor. Let's see a one of one auto. Funkadelic man. No. I can't do that again. I hope that was the biggest one. Walton. I could be a Funkadelic anyway. 309 Kyle Pitts Falcons. James. Well James that would be not great. Incident Impact Rookie Jersey Matt Crowell Panthers. Did we learn nothing after a global pandemic? Did we learn nothing? Or America. No of course we didn't learn. That's true. That's true. We don't learn anything. Joe makes it into 499 Bengals. Got Funkadelic. DK Metcalf to 299 Seattle. James you should request it. You should. Can you please put? I'm finished with these. Can you put them in the big stash? Recycle these please. You should request it. The DK to 75 on the Operation Detonation Seattle. Redemption now. We've got George Pickens. First impressions autograph. Memorabilia red for the Steelers. It's not being so wasteful. Save the chips. Hashtag. Hashtag recycle the chips. So 399 Chris Olave for the Saints. There we go. Funkadelic. Bradshaw to 199 for the Steelers. Oh here we go. Isaac Bruce on the Superlatives out of the 25 for the Rams. That's cool. Debo Samuel. You can see if Michael Myers is on cameos to get a sound. Funkadelic baby. Yeah baby. Rookie Mini. Yellow Diamond to 299. Breeze Hall Jets. Mystique David Bell. $50 for a diamond. I don't know about this game Don. I'm getting nervous. I mean. Come on Magic. Let's go. Cave York Browns on the Rookie Auto here to 25. You go Browns. Herbert Operation Detonation. See. Bad times. Aaron Donald 7 to 10 Rams Green. And Mystique Vilish Jones Jr. Rookie Bears at 399. What?  You think he's watching the game? Oh yeah. Look where he has it on. What is that for? Got Kenneth Walker III. Sean Alexander. Jewel Jersey Seahawks. Drake London. Christian Watson. Packers Rookie to 499. Funkadelic Terry Bradshaw. Cowboys CD Lam. Jersey Card. Highlight Swatches. Donald Operation Detonation. Chris Olave. Saints Rookie to 399. Got Mystique. Rookie's Amir White Raiders to 299. First impressions. Packers Christian Watson. Rookie Jersey Auto. 1-16 of 299. Nice hit. Packers. Chris Olave. Got Debo Samuel to 1-99. Auto for the Niners. No, Auto. Sorry. Just to 1-99 Niners. Funkadelic Terry Bradshaw to 399 Steelers. Bills Dawson Knox on the Superlatives. Auto to 99. Got Jamar Chase. Operation Detonation. Devontae Smith to 499 for the Birds. Mystique Kyle Hamilton. Tyler Bady Ravens on the Rookie Auto to 99. Yeah, he was joking, Jay. James always coming here saying crazy stuff. Juju Smith Schuster to 399 Chiefs. And Camp Cards Joe Burrow to 1-99. Bengals. Joe Scheiste. 3-3 out of the play-in. Come on, Magic. Saw Skarner, Richard Sherman, Duel Jersey random to those teams at the end. Seahawks and Jets. Really turned over. Sick, dude. Just going so well, Donnie. Oh, yeah, looks like it. Nick Chubb to 499 for the Browns. My illusionist, Kamara Mystique Trevon Walker. Got Kyle Hamilton, Ed Reid, Duel Jersey Ravens. Got the Deja Vu there. Najee Harris. Tua Tonga Vilao to 399 Dolphins. Mystique Alec Pierce-Coltz, Rookie to 399. All of them Florida. We need the last germs. First impressions. Brian Robinson's Jr. RPA to 75 Commanders. Joe Burrow. Jay's going to order the- Yes, the old chips, please. To 199, Tyler Lockett Seahawks. Camp cards, Aaron Rodgers Packers to 299. That's terrible right now. Eagles, Mike Quick, Elusive Ink to 75. Wow. Mike Quick Eagles. Matt Stafford to 499, Borda Rams. Heck, yeah, Jay. There's got to be a term for someone like that, right? Kyle Phillips, Rookie Auto Titans to 199. Scavenger. Yeah, scavenger. Jay hasn't paid for a meal in a year and a half outside a restaurant. To 399, Ezekiel Elliott Cowboys. Mystique Rookie, Alec Pierce-Coltz to 199. Okay, so this brought up a tough memory. I used to work in a barbecue restaurant. There was legitimately a guy that would eat fries. Was this like a regular? No, some that worked there. He would eat the fries. From plates or like baskets or whatever.  Like, not even- I'm not joking. I wonder where that guy is now. I was like, this is unbelievable. It's a yellow diamond to 299, Russell Wilson Broncos. Stibulus Jones Jr. If it's like a fry or a chip, that's one thing. But if it's like- No, it was like fries, but it wasn't a one-time thing. Damian Pierce, Incident Pack, Rookie Jersey, Texas. He got fired for something. I forget. I mean, someone that'll do that is going to get fired for something eventually. Like, that's just like an unhinged person. Aaron Tondo, the 175 Rams. Dude, I'm telling you. Malik Will is that sick to 50 on the Black King of Cards. Black frame there. Anyway, I don't want to talk about that anymore. We were talking about that. It brought up that memory. I couldn't- I couldn't keep that one in, guys. I couldn't do it. Yeah, it's that for that guy. The 25 Operation Detonation Russell Wilson Broncos. I'll never speak of it again. Redemption George Pickens, First Impressions, Automem for the Steelers there. There we go. Steelers again with the Pickens. What's the base look of the Operation Detonation? Like, I don't- That's not base. Oh, it's gold. That's gold to 25, I think. Okay, gold. To $4.99, Justin Fields. Yeah, gold looks good. All the colors are good. The gold black look really good. Yeah, gold looks really good. Fields to $4.99, Bears Burrow to $3.99. King of Cards, Bengal. I don't know why I thought it was base because I'm top loading it. So obviously, my head's not where it needs to be right now. It's all right, Donnie. It's all right. Quandre Dig, Seahawks on the Superlative is in to $1.99. Quandre is now related to Trayvon and Stefan, is he? I- Pretty sure he's not. I feel like we would have known. I don't think they're brothers or anything, but they might be like cousins or something. Yellow Diamond, James Conner to $2.99 Cardinals. Because I think I've heard something about them. Ritter, King of Cards. I don't think they're like- Yeah, I don't think they're like six- Well, I guess the sibling's still sibling. I feel they're related somehow. That might be. Montrell Washington Broncos, Rookie Otto to $75. They're not really related. Okay, not really related. Gotcha. Just worked in hotels for one salt cook. Just not to say none of the format for a guy that returned for a bad review. Nice Black-Eyes Rookie Skymore Chiefs to $50. Illusionist, Najee Harris to $2.99 Steelers. Dang, Jay. Yeah, don't mess with chefs. Us overworked people, underpaid people working in the kitchens making your food. I've heard there's- Don't get mad at cooks.  This isn't like anything like Forrest talked about, but I went to a Chili's to get a Door Dash for her one time. And- Yellow Diamond, Deandre Swift to $2.99 for the Lions. I don't know what happened, but all you hear in the back from the chef is just cursing and swearing and all this, and the manager starts doing it. It was like, this is a bad situation. TJ Watt, Trophy Collection Signatures Redemption Steelers again.  They're not being okay, I guess. I don't know. To $175, AJ Brown Eagles. It legit felt like a Kitchen Nightmare situation. I thought Gordon Ramsay was going to pop out of nowhere. Commanders Brian Robinson, Jr. Rookie Endorsements Order to $1.99. Cup Amazing. So $4.99, Ryan Tannehill Titans. Mystique Jahan Dotson, Commanders Rookie to $2.99. First Impressions Tyquan Thornton on the RPA for the Pats, one of 25. Sauce and Sherm on the Jetson Seahawks Dual Jersey. So if we end up with just two of these, I'm going to give one to each. They're both non-numbered, but that'll be random at the end. And if we get a third one, if not, we'll get one to each because there's two of those base ones now for the same card. Yellow Diamond Seahawks Treyland to $2.99. Not Seahawks. Niners Treyland, not Seahawks. Red Lobster. I'd crush them, Red Lobster. I love them. Treyland Berks, Rookie and his 10-pack Jersey Titans. Oh, nice. That is a Jack Lambert, TJ Watt, Trophy Collection. It's a 10. Gold at 10. What a card for the Steelers. Those cases?


All right, we are now recording, please go ahead. Wonderful. Shall we start at the top with GitOps Working Group, where I did have a little bit of conversation with Alexis about this right at the beginning when he was first proposing it. I think the main thing here is they wanted a neutral place for a bunch of companies to collaborate. And if that isn't what the sandbox is for, I don't know what it is. Yeah, I spoke to him the other day and it was like it's very much that they want to make sure that the Working Group produces stuff that might live longer than the Working Group, which might not potentially last for that long in the end, but they want somewhere to collaborate that's ongoing past that and maintain the things. I think it's a great initiative. I'm just thinking that do you think it will be a confusion with a with a naming working group, like we have working groups as as entities in TOC in CNCF. And now it's like kind of like a project name initiative name in sandbox. I think it's probably a right now, but if the Working Group shuts down and they just maintain the project, it probably needs a different name that's not working group then but the moment there is the it's the app. It's like a standard. It's a good point. I don't love the name but I don't want that to be a reason to say no. Absolutely. Yeah. Oh, Chris is saying as long as working groups done on code should be fine. Do they have code or a project that they want to check in. It's a good question. I don't think so. I think it's more documentation. The moment is for the contents of the working group repo under that's under flux. Yeah, but it would potentially have outputs of the working group after that. Can we create a I was wondering if we could create a repo under the TOC org, like other work groups. She moved it to a GitHub organization called GitOps Working Group. We don't really care where the working group or project lives as long as it's a neutral independent org. Yeah, I wonder if we should just say yes and then say hey this might cause confusion with other working groups that are part of six. So if you were able to think of another name. I think it's fair. I'm just wondering if, you know, the fact that it's not a project doesn't necessarily have, you know, code yet. And it's a working group. We have a lot of working groups. We have a lot of SIGs. If we just move it to wherever the SIGs are working groups live today. Maybe this speaks to a slightly broader problem of bureaucracy potentially getting in the way of just people getting on and doing work. So I think when they set this up, they had four or five different companies who wanted to get involved and wanted to get on and work. And I think they just didn't want to go through the rigmarole of a SIG and they were like, we just need to just need a GitHub repo and we can just get on with it. I don't know whether that says something about the way SIGs are managed. I guess should we just say yes to this and then have a separate conversation that isn't during this call about what we do with working groups and SIGs but move on to other voting now. That sounds like a good idea. Yeah. So let's put in the chat. So unless anyone has any other questions, votes for GitOps working group. Hang on. I've put a note in here that they do actually have their own repo over under SIG at delivery. They are both a working group and a project is the plan not one or the other. Got it. Okay. Because I was a bit, I was, that's why I asked Alexis back because I was confused. Is this a working group or a, or a project and he said both because they want to have as effects that outlive the working group. No. Okay. Have we got enough? Not yet. I'm at five. That's five without including Michelle who voted before you asked for votes. Excellent. That passes. Thank you. Yeah, is that enough for? Yes, we can move on. Right. So next up is to various data store. So it's like, it's like a gateway to the limit projects to install them easily easily on Kubernetes. So they've put like a similar projects like Longhorn and Rook. I don't think like they're exactly like Longhorn, because Longhorn is like the entity that contains everything. Here it's like it's, it's enablement for a limit projects. I guess it's more similar to Rook. It's a company. And it is a company. Yeah. And they have like their projects are open source, but they're a part of CNCF. So, do you have any opinion about this? I've certainly, I mean, I've certainly known limit and DRBD for a long time. Until I saw this project, I haven't, surprisingly, I haven't encountered it in the Kubernetes ecosystem. I'm a little surprised given how famous DRBD was. Yeah, they worked, Linbit was involved with open source Kubernetes site for a while. Beyond that, I'm not too familiar with them. This idea of having a operator for deploying, deploying their, their application seems fine. I think it'll be more interesting if they ever intend to go into incubation. We have an outstanding question I think right now of what we want to do with storage systems in general. That'll come up here. Also, I've had a recollection we have talked before or hesitated before about operators, whether an operator is in itself sufficiently interesting as a project. You know, it's just an operator. It's not really, it's just kind of glue, isn't it? It's also a CSI driver, it says as well.  But do we want CNCF projects for operators for essentially every bit of software out there? No, I don't have, there was a Postgres operator, what would we? I mean, I would actually, when you would, Liz, when you were mentioning that like my SQL Postgres was exactly what came from my mind. I mean, in fact, if there's actually a good one that you don't need, that's why the DBA does, I would think that that actually would be very valuable. I think I completely agree that it would be valuable and it would be a good example of an operator. I'm just wondering, like there could be a thousand, maybe we need a whole other kind of category of project for operators. It just feels like. But isn't, isn't, I mean, if our goal is to faster, you know, adoption of Kubernetes get more. I would think that would be a great thing if they're actually good operators that could bring popular workloads on top of Kubernetes. And I, to be honest, some of these operators, if they operate as just a pattern, right? So depending on how much business logic goes into it, and if they're so sophisticated, they could easily dwarf some of the platform components. So, I guess I'm not sure. Actually, I'm not clear. And to be clear, it seems like it's more than just an operator in this case, it looks like it's the CSI driver and other components as well. Yeah, so they're saying everything under this Piraeus data store organization. Yeah, I think, yeah, I think so. That just seemed a bit more. And do we know anything about how this compares to some of the other. No, I just, but, you know, again, if I want to, you know, I think the, I think Lynn, Lynn bid and DRBD, I mean, that those are really, really credible software. That's open source software. Yeah, I'd say again, like I have no objections for moving this to sandbox. We have a number of CSI drivers and even the Kubernetes repo. I think it's the question will be if they want to move any of these individual projects to an incubation level. They do also have under why do you want to contribute your project. It talks about increasing the visibility of the project to attract more users and contributors. Does it already have like a community, you know, is there a community around it or is it kind of one company's not that necessarily has to be a gate for sandbox but do we think it's, it's there to be a community project. I mean, so far it's clearly just a limb limbit project, but, but you know, again, the limbit stuff is very popular. Yeah. I mean, they have a decent size ecosystem like Shing said, probably more pop, I mean, they're, they're the different scale there. They're deployments. I would even claim it's perhaps more popular than Seth, for example. Yeah, is it.  Take it to a vote. Michelle was a plus one. I don't know if you already saw that that passes, we can move on. Thank you. These two clown query submissions are they. Do you think it's just the second one is an updated version of the first one. I think so consider them together, please. It's basically a one person project. There's a few other people who have one or two commits. But it's like six other people, but it's very small. The repository was created last year and of last year, so it's relatively new. But it's 20, 20. Yeah, seems to be active. And one person contributing mostly. I kind of feel like it's for the future, maybe we can introduce an extra column for when the GitHub repository was created like I always derive this information myself. APIs. I feel like that would be useful. Sounds like a good idea to me. Just tracks me as being too new to know if it's got any traction and doesn't have any, doesn't give us any compelling reason why it needs to be in sandbox get more traction like it's been asked, you know, people said they won't collaborate on this. I'm struggling a little bit to see how this would be. Definitely, you know, why would we recommend this over a prior custodian, for example, when they say focus more on questions and monitor less on actions, more focused on actions. Does feel a bit early to me. Um, do we want to go to a vote personally and no, I think it's a, it's too early to see not compelling that it needs to be in sandbox. Probably enough that it doesn't pass, I guess. Can move on. I see a note on the next one. Why is young Amy said email for corrections. Is that he never got back to me and the challenge is that he put his name instead of the project name and it's not exceptionally clear. So the repository is empty like there are no PR is no issues. I mean, yeah, it's a, it's a, again, it's a single person project since last September. Seems way too early. This is definitely not ready. Which I call it Calabash. Calabash. Tuna land. Also a one person project that's very new. Oh, he says it has two contributors, but they're actually the same person. Also, also November the 15th. And they actually position themselves so the goal is of Tuna land is to flatten the learning curve with existing CNCF projects by intentionally bonding them behind the language interface. But if you look at the repository, like there is no example of such integration with any of the cloud native projects. I'm just curious of what they mean by that. It seems very, very early. It's very rough. More probably just got created November last year. Sorry. Didn't mean that. I wonder if we should establish those sort of like men time, like men lifespan, like your get every co needs to be at least a year old or something. We're letting in the Github's working group. Which is, but that's a working group though right. Well, but if it was a project, I mean, if, if Microsoft and Amazon and Google came together and said we want to build a project for Tuna land. We need a neutral place. We'd kind of go yeah, let's do it. I guess it could also be that someone takes some proprietary software, let's just say it's really good and put it on GitHub and might be relatively young but might have years of development behind it. It's multiple factors right it's not just me. I guess I guess what I'm saying is well that is all very true and possible. I suspect that we're going to be effectively dealing with more, not quite spam but then we are going to be dealing with the opposite problem, but I'm just wondering maybe just a fact if we're going to find a hard, hard guideline like we generally expect, you know, one of or three of the following six, you know, like multi large corporation collaboration pre existing user base or, you know, a year's worth of evidence of contributions or so I don't know. It feels like there's some mechanistic stuff that we can do here to filter with that would save us time. I mean, the one out to be honest, I don't know if we're willing to do that but the one I like the most is some kind of a user adoption. We could, even if it's subjective that would exclude a lot of project. Yeah, I mean I don't know how good of a metric it is but even things like stars forks or number of people watching isn't it's not user adoption but it's like a mediocre proxy metric for that and a few of these are at zero on some of those. Although it's also a game game that people can gain something like that. That's the thing. Are you looking for projects to have a certain number of these things people achieve those things and then kind of go, you have to let me in. Well, no. No, I wouldn't put it as a record. It's a it's necessary but not sufficient. Yeah. Yeah, I think you're right some guidelines about. Yeah. Some of the kind of things we're looking for. Maybe. I mean maybe requesting testimonials from two users or something as part of the form. You know, at least for somebody to go find somebody who's willing to write like a repair three sentences about why it's cool or something. Actually, yeah, and if it was about looking for a neutral collaboration space. That could be, you know, okay, we don't have this yet but you know, two other organizations want to come together and get involved. Yeah. Because it's always hard to find developers collaborators, you know contributors but at least they can find some users. Anyway, something to think about I don't want to derail that just something that occurs to me as a way of like getting a some sort of filter on here so that we don't because I definitely feel like we're visiting some here where we just really sure that we're not going to push them through and it seemed way too early or whatever. Yeah. All right. Amy, do you want to think about how we could phrase something like that or should we maybe try and think up some examples of how to do that offline. Yeah, I'm a little concerned that the form is going to get a little too long. But that doesn't mean that we can't add things so we'll take this. We have like an FAQ about some of these points. Yeah. I believe we're in Cuban vaders. Yes. You've invaded. Excellent. Thank you. I don't think quite about anything based on space. This is super cute like major cute points here seems like a fun project. It's based on a games framework or default which has a license that I'm just trying to read but I'm just trying to get a non commercial license. I would, I'm really unsure about this. I mean it's like so it's based on a and it's based on a game engine with a non open source license. Yeah, we'd have to take a look at it. Yeah, I'm a little bit familiar with the default folks. Do you want to check that out first and then if it's okay to come back for another vote or come back for a vote? Yeah, I'll do some research on on my end. Maybe they can move to another engine. Alrighty, we'll leave that to you Chris. Curie fence. November 2020. Well, very recent. I think their website looks super fancy application security platform. I think Matt Klein was working with with them so Matt knows a little bit more because I think they're using envoy filters as part of their solution. Yeah, it talks about extending on the proxy. Did you get the impression that he's positive about it? I think so. But I don't want to speak on his behalf. They have his picture and a quote from him on their website. And as well as Chris from Cisco and this guy James from eBay. So if we're looking for a couple of users to say something they did that on their website for whatever that's worth. If it's super envoy specific should it be like an envoy sub project if it's a plugin or something. It seems very security specific which I don't think would fit into the envoy. Well, they tend not to host all the filters within the envoy project itself. So it's a web security firewall right that's, yeah it's interesting. I don't, I don't know are there any other web security firewalls in our space here. Web application firewall sorry. Not that I know of. Interesting. Why they want to contribute. That's interesting. They're wanting to, I think they mean assure users that curie fences and going to do the elastic change maneuver. That's pretty, pretty interesting. I mean, unlike the other recent, very recent projects it does have a whole lot of people equally contributing which is encouraging not just one person. And do we think they all come from, well I guess they could come from, they could come from the same organization and just, you know, right well should we go to vote that passes we can move on to different things with an s that's like a go. Yes, I think these folks present they did not present I mean they. This is a submission that came back. This is a reapply. Yahoo, or if I recall, maybe Yahoo Japan. What did we tell them last time. We had a question around spiffy spire. Yeah, address that. Oh yeah, how is different to spawn. We see this one last time. Mm hmm. Yeah, that's a reapply. Do you all remember what the, what the gap was. If I recall the to see just wanted to understand how does this differ from spiffy spire and if it potentially integrates with that. I think that was the summary. Yeah, it's used widely in production at and Yahoo and it's related companies as far as I know. I think it's kind of compactable with, you know, it's an alternative to spire, and it looks like that kind of concentrated on some of the more kind of enterprise he features like tenancy support, I guess multi tenancy. There's a UI. And of course I'm in trouble with spiffy because that's a lot of spiffy X599 ideas as well. So it's got some overlap. Yeah, that's pretty interesting. You know, if it's used in production somewhere like Verizon, that's a big old. Any other comments or should we make a vote. Let's get votes. QVN press you've dropped something in chat context or explainer really. I think that yeah just reference for people interested. It's been a while since I've come across over and mostly in the open stack days. I can see a contrast against Calico. And I can see also a comparison against Calico, and I can see this project compared against OVM Kubernetes. How active is the OVM community these days. I think it's still used fairly widely. I just don't know how active. Open V switches still still kicking around. Find a neutral place for better adoption and community collaboration. Is this, I feel like I'm getting rapidly out of my depth here, but if we adopt something like that, is it overlapping with that kind of OVM world in a way that No, I mean this is a CNI implementation right. This is a driver. It's basically all it is to work with open V switch and so on. Comes from Aluda, which did Alibaba buy them and trying to remember who or bite dance. Do you remember Shang by any chance. I think they're independent.  We see. Maybe. I'm trying to someone bought them. I just don't remember who another Chinese company. But looking at their website, it's just, there's still a member of CNC. Yeah, I know. Looks looks independent to me. Not bad if they're quiet. It looks like, you know, the team has people from lots of different companies. Oh yeah, maybe Aluda. I'm confusing them with Chi Cloud. I'm going to take off by dance. All by, by dance.  I suppose is my worry. I mean they're fairly if you look at the releases, they've been pretty good. Pretty consistent at least compared to the other. I don't think Open Vs which is just going to go away suddenly overnight or anything. Yeah, no, it's going to stick around for a while. Any other comments or should we do votes? K8 dash. Is this indeed as in the recruitment people? That is correct. Optimize for mobile. Joe. Also relatively new. Relatively new project. I'm looking at the. At the top commuters. Oh, no, it's March 31st, 2019. So it's been a while. So I guess I have a concern around naming since Kubernetes has a Kubernetes dashboard called Kubernetes dashboard. This may end up getting confusing. Yeah. I agree. It's not had a lot of work. I mean, like, it's like the top commuter has 10 commits. It's like. It's just. It's not clear how much. Very big. 10 commits with 436 lines of code. Not really even very big commits. Number three makes up for it though. Yeah. 109,000 line vendor in commit. I always try and be the person who takes that carried out myself. So I'll get the negative scores. But I mean, I think the combination of age and the amount of activity. Pays an interesting picture. Given that it's not super new, it's March, 2019, at least with from the contributor page. But nobody has a lot of commits in there. Months like. The stretch between July and January, it looks pretty dead all together. So I don't know how active or how much of a. Like growth future this has. I wonder like what the story is like, is this maybe an internal project that they. Over is that why there was just one very, very large. I really like to understand more. Look at that. Look at the GitHub tree in master. It shows 300 commits and. Some of them emerge. Some of them are coming from like the users that are not a part of the GitHub. Like. Seems like there's more, but yeah, there is a. The majority of the activity starts. Around October last year before that, that was pretty idle. Maybe it was not on GitHub. And most of the committers are just don't have to have accounts. Yeah, that makes a lot more sense. Yeah. It looks like an internal indeed project that they maybe flip the bit on. Yeah, that makes a lot of that makes more sense because it's, yeah, it's actually much more. I'm going to guess that the Kubernetes project. Don't. Well, should we ask you to see if they're. Concerned about having multiple dashboards. It's a good idea. It's also the very first dashboard project that wants to join CNCF. We don't have anything else. Yeah, I don't know if we should ask. I definitely feel like the dashboard project was like explicitly forked out and said people said we don't actually want this. Seems sort of imply that like. Let many flowers bloom as long as it's not in our space. So what does it now is it. Well, I mean, I think it's still in the rematch still be in the repo, but it was. I think that like it was. Sort of everybody said, Hey, this thing is not, we're not fully confident security of this thing. And like, so I think it's there sort of for historical reasons, but I don't think it was. I think it was sort of explicitly unendorsed at some level. And there's other dashboards out there, right? VMware has octant. I think there's people have built a ton of these things. The clouds have all built their own too. Yeah. So I guess they want to contribute it. That's even got hacked over first. Should he vote for this? Can we put in a yes with a please rename or something like that? Something less generic. We definitely want to rename. Or do we want to ask Kubernetes if they have a concern? I'm just thinking from like an end user perspective, since there's already a Kubernetes dashboard. We make it clear that this is something new and different. I'd ask them to rename personally. Okay. Shall I do a vote for Kim Vanessa's. Okay. Subject to rename. Yeah. Sounds good. So we made it. Hey. Good. So exciting. What's the stock distribution thing about that? So yeah, I mean, it's been languishing in Docker. And everyone has their own forks of it. Yeah. Yeah. So basically, we've not appointed maintainers from. Get lab and get hub and harbor and. Digitalation. Who are all using it. And production. So. Hopefully we can kind of. Unfaulk it all and get people contributing again by being at NCF. So. I was planning to move it to apply for incubation pretty soon. Yeah. I think that's a good idea. Yeah. I think that is in reduction use everywhere. Definitely. Yeah. Do we have a feel about the name? I, we don't have a, we don't, I need, it needs a new org name because it hasn't got its own org, but I have no idea. But I kind of tried to think about renaming it. I kind of like distribution for historical reasons now. Cause it's always been called that. And I kind of come around to it. Cause I was thinking like. It's a totally new name, but I think maybe an org name that's. Like there are like, um, you know, something about registry or something might be good, but, um, I kind of, but I will, I'm not really attached. I'm a fifth. The maintainers want to rename it or if anyone wants to rename it, I don't mind, but you know, it's always been distribution. It's kind of the people who use it and know it as distribution and OCI and things. It's got a community around it, I think. Any other comments? Seems like a great addition. It's very cool. That passes. Distribution deal. Yeah. I was thinking of ideas for you, Justin. Yeah, that's kind of nice. Cool. I think that's it. All right. As far as part. Otherwise I can turn the recording off. Yeah. We're in the midst of TOC elections. Yeah. Yeah. I think we could stop the recording. Do we want to just take a couple of minutes to go?


Well there's a lot of different characteristics about what defines the best warrior. Really what we want to see is we want to see the soldiers that build cohesive teams, that are disciplined, physically fit, and well trained. And so that's exactly what defines our best warrior competitors out here. Well I don't think I'm the best. I think I'm surrounded by a lot of good other officers. I think that's what brings out the best in people, which is surround yourself by good competition. That way it brings you up to other people's level. That way you actually get to push yourself, test your limits, and really find out a lot of things about yourself. I think I'm the best warrior because I stepped up to the challenge. I came out here, I'm representing the cohort. I'm the only one that's out here. And these warrior tasks and drills fit in because it's stuff that we don't do regularly in the army and it's skills that if we don't use them we lose them. And it's things that it separates you as a soldier absolutely. Well I think teamwork is an important part of being the best soldier because you need to be able to effectively communicate with your team to get the mission done. We work better in groups than that as a single unit. So for my peers in the competition career counselor wise I think they're pretty solid, two pretty solid soldiers. They've actually taught me stuff while we're here. I've taught them a little bit, communicated, being able to just talk to each other because we're all on a different basis. The next step will be to go on to FORSCOM. 36 double MDC is a direct reporting unit to FORSCOM. So whoever wins our soldier in NCO the year for this year will go on and compete and represent our command at the FORSCOM level.


I'm gonna put that off.  Anyway, here we go. So I'm, I don't know, 40 hours in, maybe one day. What's one day plus 12 hours? 36, almost 36 hours, no more than that. I think more than that. Well, anyway, yeah, 36, 40 hours in to a 60 hour keto reboot. Really quick as you're jumping on, have you done a reboot before? Just curious. 60 hours long is the best thing I've ever found. I do this so I don't have to be so regimented constantly on my eating plans. Like I get to, it gives me a lot of flexibility. So this is pretty amazing. If you've ever done before, it's pretty cool.  Mine's about half gone because I'm using it. And then you get the option to eat or not. And what I mean by that is you can go 24 hours and go with your first meal. You can go 36 hours, you can go 48 hours, or you can go for the full 60 hours. The idea behind this is to let your body rest and recover, repair. Also, you're gonna learn about how you emotionally are attached to food, but you get, they're still in ketosis the whole time. So you're really protecting your body. It's an unbelievable kit. It's just awesome. This is by far, we revamped the kit a handful of months ago.  But you don't have to, that's the cool thing is that we get to reboot your way. So someone to go lie to me, not in the moment. Sipping drinks in the woods. Yes, if you jump back on the reboot wagon this weekend, that's awesome sipping drinks. I like that handle, that's pretty cool. So the really cool thing is, is a few benefits that I've noticed. So I've been doing this. I've done 50, 60, I don't know how many reboots. I've done a lot of them. And what's interesting, when you're doing a reboot, like I said, there's an emotional attachment to food. Sometimes people don't realize that attachment to food. So when you're on a health journey and you're emotionally attached to food it can make your journey really tough. It can make it really challenging. So this kit basically helps taper down the overall appetite. It elevates your ketone level. So with elevated ketone levels you get increased focus, mental clarity, energy. You just feel really good. And what I really like about this kit is that you're not getting that excessive bowel movement effect during cleanses. What's up, Derek Smallman? Hey, I never heard of you coming over. Are you coming out to Dallas with me? Let me know. Give me a shout if you're coming to Dallas. What's up Cisco? What? What? Dude. Everybody say hi to Francisco. I think that's who it is. Cisco, Cisco, man, in the house. But anyway, this has been great because I'm a big fan of, I like to eat. I like food. I eat a lot of protein. I like to work out. And I'm like, should I really go that many days without food? And what I've found is even though I like to work out even though I like food a lot taking that break every once in a while really helps me out. It helps reset my system. My system helps give me a rest. Gives me appreciation for food. Yes, Derek texts me, buddy. We got chat logistics. But my appreciation for food. So I really like this. I don't do this all the time. I do it at max once a month. We have some people that will do it more than once a month. I like to say people that are more unhealthy or maybe more really obese or have a lot of weight to lose could do it more often. You just don't wanna give them a pattern of always not eating. You gotta eat food. Food's the fuel, man. You gotta put it in your body, get strong. But one of my favorite products is right here. And I think this was Derek. Derek, are you the one to ask me for these? I think you did. I found this in my box. So I will save this for you, but this is a Keto Pro. And I'm a little biased. My name is also the Keto Pro, one of them. So I'm a little biased, but this is our Keto protein. And this has been a big change for us recently. We used to use a broth. Which the broth is really good. It just didn't bring down my appetite enough where I felt like I was always in a fight for food. And I hate that. Like especially when you have four kids at home. You're running an international business. You got life going on. You got everything happening.  It's not pleasant.  But this really tapers my appetite down.  And now I don't have to eat. I promise you it saves you a lot of time. So what's up Washington? Kamie's in the house. So one of my new additions to this is this flavor here. But it's really simple. Like if you think about your iPhone, which I'm using right now, you need to reset it, right? Every once in a while you have to do a soft reset. Sometimes you have to do a hard reset. So I like to say this is that are I fast for five days is like a soft reset.  And then every once in a while you have to do a hard reset. And that's what I call the 60RQ reboot. It's like it's resetting it. The problem I have is there's a lot of cleanses out there that actually aren't really giving you the reset that you're looking for. They're actually causing excessive stress on the human body and we don't want to do that. Your body naturally knows how to cleanse and detox itself. We just want to encourage you to be better at that and give it a break. But we also want you to feel good. We want you to be able to go live your life at the same time. And that's what we've done over the last six years, five years since we started the fasting protocols with ketones. And so it's pretty remarkable for me. I am on a goal for the month of July to drop 10 pounds for the month of July. I'm over halfway there. I got a week left, so I'll be just fine. But I'm over halfway there and this is a nice little accelerator for me because I will drop probably an extra pound to a pound and a half over the last two days. Now the scale will show me more. The scale is going to show me drop in maybe three or four pounds. But the reality is, is I probably only going to drop, let's say I burn 3000 calories. That's, I can almost get two pounds. There's 3,500 calories in a pound of fat. Does anybody know that? Did anybody know how many calories in a pound of fat is? There's 3,500 calories in a pound of fat. I did work out yesterday. Today I'm going to go on a long walk. I will work out tomorrow when I come off my fast. And even on the day I come off, I don't eat a lot of food because when you come off fast, you don't typically need to pound a lot of food. So 3,500 calories.   So I'll probably burn almost two pounds of fat. I'll probably get the third pound or the two and a half pounds by the end of Wednesday because I won't be eating a lot. By Thursday, I'll be back in my full eating like I normally do. And as because I'm trying to drop some body fat, I'm a little bit less calories, eating a little tighter than I normally would. So just kind of give you guys a perspective. Sometimes you see people do a reboot and they're like, I lost 10 pounds.  They dumped a lot of waste and that's okay. That's good. That's part of the reset and getting your body healthier.  So you'd have to go run a marathon or something for more than that. It's insane when you think food calories versus fat, calories burned. Yeah, it's cool. Because so when you get the ketones, ketones have about five per gram. But ketones burn more than carbs and carbs and sugars with fats the highest when it's ingested. So anyway, it's pretty neat stuff. Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba. So that's all I got to say. So anyway, who's doing the reboot with me? If you are, give me a shout out. Let me know. Send me a result if you have a testimonial or if you feel better, if you're feeling good. Most people notice in the reboot, they notice more energy, more focus, better mood, better sleep.  Somebody just commented, only one pound, wow. It's simple. What happens is that people want to or expect to lose a successful amount of weight. I will lose probably five or six pounds on the reboot. But I probably will only lose two to two and a half pounds of fat on the reboot. That's important because what happens is your weight has bacteria in it. When you don't eat food, it doesn't have, it doesn't fill up as much. You don't have to eliminate as much. It does some things come out there because your body's getting rid of waste, but your bowels are empty.  These are kind of simple concepts. Also, I'll be deeper in a state of ketosis, meaning that I'm gonna be wasting out excessive fluid that my body doesn't need. Maybe my knees a little swollen. Well, it'll be less swollen after the reboot. So that's less weight. Because that water and that fluid has been released out of my body. So if I go back to normal eating, my bowels are gonna fill up to a certain level. So that'll add up a little bit of weight. My body might hold a little bit water differently, especially depending on what I eat. So this is why the scale can really screw people up is that they're like, I lost all this weight and I gained it back. I can literally in one night, I could go to bed tonight. I could eat a certain type of food. I could wake up tomorrow being nine pounds heavier than I was this morning. Like, I know that. So it doesn't surprise me when that happens. I don't freak out because I know it happened, right? So this is important because when people are on their weight loss or health journey, they let a scale dictate it and they don't understand the mechanisms of what's all happening. What's up, Australia? We should talk today. I'm going crazy. They're buzzing me when we're done and when I'm off, I'll be around. But with that said and done, 60-hour keto reboot, it's on. It's on like Donkey Kong. If you haven't done this with us, drop down the reboot down below and let's do a reboot, man. Let's do this thing because it is a game changer. If you really want to change your health and changing your health isn't just about what you eat. It's about how you think. It's about how you make decisions. It's about what you eat. It's about what you take. It's about how you move your body. It's about how you sleep. It's all of those aspects and that's what matters the most. So that's why there is no one diet that will ever work for everybody. It does not exist anywhere in the world, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever. You have to create a lifestyle that you're ultimately going to do. So with that said and done, cheers. I'm out here. Can your body weight fluctuate if you stay in flight or flight? Yeah, of course it can. She said, or he or she said, can your body weight fluctuate if you stay in flight or flight? Yes. I'm going to give you a couple of examples. Has anybody ever heard of the breakup diet? I'm waiting to see if anybody heard of it. Anybody ever heard of the breakup diet? So stress, so flight or flight means that your body's under high amounts of alert or stress. So they can do two things. One, initially it can actually drive down appetite. It can cause people to not eat very much. They are heart rates racing all the time. Their metabolism is actually being stimulated in some levels. Their heart rate, maybe their normal average heart rate runs at 80 a day and they're running at 120 and they're burning more calories because they're just literally in a panic all the time. So that can be happening when somebody goes through high levels of stress. They can lose a lot of weight at their high levels of stress. Doesn't mean you can make them healthy. This means that they lost a lot of weight. Potentially they're going to lose some muscle mass in that journey too. But then you have the flip side of that where people are under high amounts of stress. Their cortisol level, stress hormone stays high all the time.  And then you start to store fat rapidly at the same time. So when you look at, does it fluctuate when you're in a fight or fight? Yes, will it be substantial really quickly? Probably not. Minimal and then it becomes chronic. It becomes more sustainable over time. So I hope that answers your question. My mom, actually ironically, my mom says she's seen a lot in the world, but one of her favorite things to use as an anti-stressor is ketones. So she drinks her ketones to help, she drinks her ketones to help reduce her stress. Funny, I don't know where my ketone packs went. Anyway, I got a 10 day, I'm dropping money. They want a 10 day ketone, 10 servings. But anyway, she drinks her ketones as a way to kind of calm herself down. So when a client goes to the hospital or whatever else she drinks him and just brings her back down into a normal range. So that makes them really, really valuable for that. People under high amount of stress, usually I wouldn't recommend this at that point. I would say let's get ketones in your system. Let's get you managing your life a little bit.  When people are in a fight or fight all the time, you don't want to necessarily change everything really fast. Because what happens is they never climb a normal. They constantly are bouncing from one thing to the next. And usually they get further from their goal. So just consistent drinking ketones will help get them in a better place, do some IFasting and then set themselves up for a reboot when that time comes. So I'm not sure who Kat Kent wants to go live with me and I'm not gonna accept it. So I don't know who you are, sorry. Anyway, I gotta go. I think my little girl's waking up. Cheers y'all. Angela, hey, we gotta talk still. By the way, Angela, we gotta talk. We gotta talk.


How much do you know about dicks? I haven't done this quiz yet, so this is exciting. Good, good, good.  You know this. I really do know this? No. Why would I know this? Because you think I have this much experience? No, you, but this is your lane.  I'm gonna go with 14.2, because it's in the middle. She got it wrong, ladies and gentlemen. The answer is 13.5 inches.  That is a ridiculous response.  Wow. What percentage of American women have used a vibrator in the past month? 50%. Think 50? I'm gonna say 50. I think it's probably 20. But 50 is wrong, for sure. Really? 20%. God damn. A lot of women out there are afraid or ashamed or embarrassed. I think a lot of vibrators aren't designed in a way that's women-friendly or inviting. So why don't we do this? How is it not invited? This is how they design sex toys. Does this seem inviting to you? If it was lubed up, it seems inviting. Microwave or lube or anything.  Okay, all right.  This is the vibrator that I use. It's sleek. It's tidy. It's attractive. That turns on. That's a vibrator. Yeah, here.  What percentage of men age 15 and up are circumcised worldwide? I'm gonna go with 30. Do you want to go with 30%, ladies and gentlemen? You got it right! Are you circumcised? I am. Are you happy about that or do you wish to grow back? No, I'm happy being circumcised. Who grows it back? What is the most affected form of birth control? Let's go IUDs and implants. Yes, look at that! I did my research. Good job! I definitely did my research in that department where I think there's no kids. I have a copper IUD, so... The other one's like here. No, no, it's in there. It's in there. Okay, got you. It's up in there. Ooh, true or false? Smoking causes stronger erections. False, it's actually the opposite. She's correct. What is the clitoris shaped like? This right here, this question is gonna tell me all I need to know. The other answers are like... This is the only one that seems logical. But the other answers make it seem like it's... It's something that we don't see.  Like it's something... Oh, I see it is, so you're telling me that now. Like what end of the boomerang? If it's a wishbone, what end of the wishbone? The boomerang would be round though and a wishbone has an actual point. Point at the top. I'm gonna go with a wishbone on this. I just gave you the answer. Yeah, yeah, bang bang. Top question or bottom question? Quickly leave that looking. Uh... Quick, just click top or bottom. I'll take the top question. It's a topper.  Just in case you guys are curious.  Oh shoot. Is douching a good idea? Yes? Or how? Yo, you gotta stop at all these questions or something for y'all, for women and their vaginas. I think it's important for men to have a good understanding. Funny you say that because when I speak on it, like when I speak about this type of things on Snapchat and I make certain jokes or it's like I'm at fault. Women feel like he can't talk about that. If I say something about pH balance, it's all of a sudden like I'm the devil. I would love you to talk about pH balance. Done it and I get literally pitchforked and like drug out to the nearest town. Scientifically speaking, I'm like, oh, they both seem to be sure why not. Hell no. It's douching a good idea. Sure, why not. Hell no. We'll go sure why not. Cause women still do it. Hell no. And I'm nifty. It's just like the hymen.  Oh my God. We're just not douching anymore. Okay, we're not wearing corsets. We're not staying in the kitchen. Sorry to burst your bubble, Cleo. Women have progressed and these are easy to take. I know you're mad about that. Last question before I let you go. Okay. Sex is to Cleo as what is to what? Sex is to Cleo what Batman is to Gotham. You know what, I love about that. This is our second time doing this cause the first time I didn't record.  That's why you get the big bucks. Mission accomplished. What's going on? I'm here with Cleo Thomas, who is a actor and is a rapper. How many partners have you had?


Water enters a pipe flowing at a uniform velocity u. As a result of passing through the pipe, the velocity becomes non-uniform and the flow at the exit follows a profile as shown in the figure below.  Note that little r is going to be the actual axis up and down, measured from the zero, that's the radius, and big r is the constant that represents the overall radius of the pipe.  If the radius of the pipe, big r, is three inches and the maximum velocity recorded at the center of the pipe outlet, u max, is 10 feet per second. Determine the inlet velocity that's uppercase u. Okay, so this is a conservation of mass problem. So we are going to start with our Reynolds transport theorem, simplified for the conservation of mass. So dM dt of our system, got a little bit ahead of myself there, which is zero, because we're analyzing a control volume is equal to, and then I'm saying d dt integral of density d volume plus the integral across the control surface density velocity vector d area vector. And then I will pose the question, can we eliminate that second term? The answer is yes. Why is it yes? Because we have steady state analysis in this problem. We weren't explicitly told that, but we can see that there's no opportunity for water to build up in the pipe or to be draining out of the pipe. It's just that regardless of when we look at the problem, the conditions are the same. If you've been running water through this pipe for 10 hours or two hours or a million and a half years, time has no effect on the problem. So I am going to add steady state to my assumptions. That's steady state. And then I am going to assume incompressible flow because we are analyzing water and for our purposes, all liquids are incompressible unless we have enough information to deduce otherwise. Incompressible implies to us that the density does not change at all. And then I was told that I have a uniform flow at the inlet. So that's not really an assumption that I need to make. I think that's enough information to move on. So because we have steady state analysis, this entire second term is zero because nothing can change with respect to time. And remember, this entire integral is the thing that is being derivated with respect to time. It's D that thing with respect to time. So I have zero is equal to the integral across my control surface of density, velocity vector, the area vector, and then density is constant. So it comes out, then I divide both sides by density and I have zero is equal to the integral across the control surface of the velocity vector times the area vector or rather the integral of the velocity vector with respect to area. And that's across the entire control surface, which is going to be my entire outside surface as crudely drawn here. There are only two orifices, that is two points at which fluid is crossing the boundary. So I am going to split that integral across those two and write this as zero is equal to the area across the inlet, which doesn't have a state point. Let's call that one. And over here we will call this two. And remember that the area vector is always defined in the outward direction. So this is across area one, that would be velocity one, the a one. And I'm adding the integral across a two, the velocity two, the a two. And then the first integral is going to simplify because that's uniform flow. So I'm going to collapse the vectors and write that as the velocity that's day one on average times area that's day one. And then if my vectors are in opposite directions, I have to add a negative. So because v one is to the right and the area at state one area vector is to the left, they're in opposite directions. So this collapses to a minus or rather a negative quantity. But I cannot simplify the integral on the right in such a manner because the velocity changes as a function of where it is within the area. So I have to leave that as an area integral a two v two a two. And then I will bring v bar one a one to the left. And I will recognize that I already have a name for the average velocity at the inlet. That's big you. So I'm going to write that as you times a one. And that's equal to the integral across a to the vector two times the area differential. Okay, now how does that simplify? Well, my velocity vector has a profile. And I was told that that velocity, which is really the velocity in the x direction. So I really should be writing you to follow the nomenclature as established in the problem.   In order to be able to evaluate this integral, then I'm going to have to write d a in terms of r. So I am going to be representing that circle in terms of radius. So quick little recap of calculus when I'm talking about integrating across a circle where the theta position doesn't matter. Then what I'm saying is I'm evaluating a whole bunch of little circular slices. This is called an annulus from the inside to the outside. And this annulus has an area that's a d a and that annulus is area because it's infinitesimally thin that is equal to two times pi times the radius that would be the circumference of that circle times dr. Does that make sense? So we're taking the circumference of this circle and we are multiplying by the thickness of the ring. So we're saying that it's such a thin circle that's basically a rectangle. So we're taking the height of the rectangle, which is the thickness, which is dr multiplied by the width of the rectangle that's wrapped around the circle. I'm making a lot of hand gestures that you can't see, but just imagine in your mind me holding an apple pencil and then moving my hand around in a circle over the image as though that's helpful. Hopefully you guys got a good foundation in that from your calculus classes, but when we're evaluating an integral for a circular section and the only thing that matters is radius, we split it into an infinite number of circular rings called annulus or annuli because it's plural. And the d a term is two pi r, which is the circumference of that annulus times dr, which is the thickness, the height, whatever the size from the inlet to outlet direction. And we are integrating from an r position of zero to big R. So I will plug that in over here. d a is really two pi r dr. And we are integrating from zero to big R.  That's not really a good two. Let's try that again. Two times two times pi times r dr. And then it's just a matter of evaluating the integral. So I will split that integral. And I will, here, let's split it after I bring everything inside the parentheses.  So I split the integral and evaluate them separately. And for that we apparently are out of room. I will write big u 181. And I will copy and paste this onto a new page. So I am probably best off just getting rid of that. And look, we have an integral zero to big R. And look, we have another integral from zero to big R.  So I have u max times two times pi. And then this becomes the integral of R with respect to R from zero to big R. Then I'm subtracting, bringing out the constants, constants, the constants, I'm bringing out the constants like you did it again. Then I'm bringing out the constants guys, times the integral from zero to big R. Guess that's also big R squared in the denominator. And we have R, R squared. So that's R cubed dr. Then I am evaluating the integral, that would be the integral of R with respect to R is one half R squared, evaluated from zero to big R, which means that I have one half times the quantity, big R squared minus zero, zero squared to zero. So this is just going to be u max times two times pi times one half times big R squared minus the integral of x cubed with respect to x would be one quarter x to the fourth. So it's going to be one over four times a little r to the fourth evaluated from zero to big R, which is going to be one quarter times big R to the fourth minus zero to the fourth. So I have one quarter times R to the fourth.  Well, that's cool. Some stuff is going to start canceling. I'm excited. R squared is going to bring this down to R squared and then two divided by four is one half. And over here, the two and the one half start canceling. So I have u max times pi times R squared minus u max times two times pi two divided by four is one half. So I'll write that as e max times pi divided by two just to be a little bit more straightforward times big R squared. So then I could factor out the stuff that's in common, which would be u max times pi times R squared.  Let's try that one more time. One minus one half. There we go. And one minus one half is one half. So this would be u max times pi times big R squared times one half. And don't forget the left hand side of this equation was u. It's the thing that we're looking for times area. And the area at the inlet is going to be pi times big R squared because the area of a circle is going to be pi times radius squared and the radius is three inches.  Hey, look, I have pi appearing on both sides and R squared appearing on both sides, which means this collapses all the way down to u is equal to u max divided by two. I think we can handle that calculation. u max was 10 feet per second. Therefore, the answer to the question is 10 divided by two, which I'm pretty sure is five. But just for good measure, let's have a calculator double check our math for us. 10 divided by two. Haha, it's five. Look, we did it. Five feet per second. So that wasn't too bad, was it?  Ain't no party like a simplification of the Reynolds transport theorem to the conservation of mass and then simplifying it all the way down to just a constant multiplied by one of the numbers that you were given.


If I don't eat leftovers for dinner, then I can have the leftovers for dinner instead of lunch. I don't know. Anyways, welcome to my channel. My name is Jocelyn J. And in today's video, we're gonna be talking about how I've invested, or five ways I've invested in my 20s, invested my money in my 20s. And I know you all like the vlog kind of style content. So what I've been trying to do is to have like searchable content, like five ways to invest your money in your 20s or whatever this title is gonna be, but showing a little bit of my personality and my day-to-day, especially since the weather's starting to break. All right, so since today is over 50 degrees, I'm actually about to walk to Subway and get a little sunlight so it can energize me to crush it today. More of these because these make drinking water so much better. But I went with this like, I forget the name a little bit, but this is Draymond Green's choice of sandwich. Not the biggest Draymond Green fan or anything like that, but the sandwich actually looked pretty good. I did a poll and I saw that you all were interested in investing. So I figured I'd go ahead and make a video talking about my experiences, investing my money. I'm a front end developer and also a content creator on YouTube for those of you all who don't know. So if you could give this video a thumbs up, I'd really appreciate it. It helps out with the algorithm a lot. One, it'll push this video to other people who may be interested in watching this kind of content. Also, it lets me know as a creator if you like this video and wanna see more content like this and I wanna make sure that I am making videos that you all like. So also subscribe to the channel to watch more content like this and become a part of this amazing community. So I definitely didn't grow up talking about like investing in terms of like investing in 401Ks, Roth IRAs and stocks. You know, I come from a single household and that really wasn't at the top of our list. So I will say that I am very fortunate to be able to have an experience or have experiences investing my money and to be able to do that and to make this video. So I'm very blessed and fortunate. So I definitely wanted to say that. In this video, the main purpose, the main purpose of this video is to share my experiences along with, you know, giving some advice that I think is beneficial. I'm also gonna talk about some of my mistakes. Give this video a thumbs up if you wanna see a like, you know, five reasons or five mistakes to avoid in your 20s, some sort of video like that. I think those are really beneficial. I definitely watch them and I think we all have some sort of experience that we've had that we regret in terms of either investing our money or just spending our money poorly. First thing that I would recommend is to take advantage of your employer's 401K benefit. If you aren't familiar with a 401K, a 401K is a retirement plan that's also a tax advantage retirement plan where you can contribute to it directly from your paycheck pre-tax. When I first started working, like fresh out of college, 22 years old, I didn't really take advantage of that 401K opportunity. I invested a little bit of money and the reason being is because I wanted to have like the largest paycheck possible. So fast forward, you know, months later, I don't know what prompted me to do this but I like found some sort of like calculator that showed me how much money my paychecks would be based on how much I contributed to my 401K. To basically see if there was a major difference between like investing 3% into my 401K compared to like my max contribution that my employer would match, which was 12% and I'll get into that in a second if that's confusing or you're not familiar with that kind of like terminology. So basically I quickly came to the realization that I was screwing myself over by not investing or not contributing to the max 401K that my employer matches.  On top of the fact that my employer matched up to half of 12%. So basically if I contribute 4%, my employer matches 2%. If I contribute 10%, my employer matches 5% and then if I contribute to the max, which is 12%, they will match me at 6%. So that's literally free money that I'm getting from my employer. So I'm glad I did it because listen, compound interest is a thing. So my 401K goal right now is to invest enough money or at least enough money to have around 100K by a little bit earlier than like age 30. Next thing is I know that some of you all may not be able to invest into a 401K right now. So the next thing I wanna talk about is investing into the stock market. And for example, I have used Robinhood. For one, I've learned from my mistakes of not holding when it comes to the stock market. To give you an example, I invested in one share of ETHRELM in mid-November. It was like $465, that's all it cost me. And then for some reason I pulled out, I started losing some money and I was like, oh, okay, I'll do this later. Cause I typically like to be pretty organized with my investing, like, okay, I wanna have X amount of dollars here and there with no credit card debt, for example, that's when I'll start investing my money. But like three months later when I reinvested in ETHRELM, ETHRELM went from $465 a share to like maybe $1,100 a share, $1,200 a share, which is almost like 300% increase. So if I would have just held and just, you know, dealt with the ebbs and flows of the stock market, especially cryptocurrency, your boy would have made an extra like $800. Luckily I did reinvest in ETHRELM over a month ago and have, it's been growing, I think it's gonna continue to grow, at least I hope so. Praying to God that ETHRELM hits 10K. But ETHRELM isn't the only thing I invest in, I also invest a little bit in the Bitcoin along with a few other stock. So that leads me into the third recommendation that I have, which is to experiment as a computer science grad and, you know, engineer. We did a lot of experiments and experiments are how you figure whether or not something works out.  We're all in different situations. I like to experiment for myself and to figure out what works best for me in life. But with Robinhood and stocks, I'm really just experimenting. I don't invest a ton of money. I invest about 10% of my total portfolio. One thing that I realize is that it doesn't make sense to have over six months of emergency fund just sitting in a savings account, at least not for me right now with a stable job and passive income. It makes more sense to either invest that in a 401k Roth IRA or put that money into stocks. And I'm gonna be honest with you, it's been great investing in cryptocurrency and learning more about like investing in stocks and just the overall market. It's been great, especially when you see that you're actually yielding return. So now I basically invest in any money that I'm not using for debt. So if it's not going to my student loans or my credit card debt, then it's gonna be going into my 401k or into stocks. So like the past year, I'd say I started investing in a Roth IRA. It really benefits you when you're young, especially when you're not in that crazy high 35, 30% tax bracket. And for those of you all who aren't familiar with a Roth IRA, it is similar to a 401k. It's a retirement account. However, it provides tax-free growth and withdrawals. However, you do have to pay taxes to that amount you contribute to from your paycheck. And that's where that not being in a super high tax bracket can really benefit you. As of right now, you can contribute to up to $6,000. I'm pretty sure if you're under the age of 50 years old. The huge benefit of a Roth IRA is that your money grows tax-free. I know it's a pain because you're contributing to it directly from your paycheck. You know, and it's taxed like off-grid. You have to be patient and you're playing the long game. With 401ks, the benefit is, hey, you're not being taxed, you know, from your paycheck when you're contributing to it.  Make sure that you research these things on your own for sure the percentage of money that they're gonna take out of your 401k when you're eligible to take that money out is gonna be different based on your tax bracket. So let's say you're in the 24% tax bracket and you have a million dollars at age like 55 or 60 and you wanna withdraw that. They're gonna take 24% of that, which is $240,000. So long-term, taking, you know, 20% out of 5% from your paycheck by putting it in a Roth IRA early and being able to withdraw it with no tax penalty is significantly better than taking a huge chunk out of your 401k where you thought you were a millionaire and now you're not. The fifth tip that I want to share with you is to just take risks. Taking risks is something that is really important in life whether it's taking a new job, taking a new role or investing money. Risks can help you in the long call but if you don't take any risks they'll end up hurting you long-term for sure. For example, I would have never known the power of investing into the stock market if I would have never pulled out and lost money in the beginning. But then I realized had, wow, this stock, this share went from $465 to $1,200 in a matter of three months and if I would have just held I would have actually profited 300%.   Take advantage of that, you know, time is money and time goes faster and faster. It seems like as you get older, especially as you have more responsibilities and find yourself spending money on things you didn't have to spend money on when you were in your 20s. Since you're in your 20s you have the ability to invest and see that money grow long-term which is a huge benefit and take advantage of that. So that concludes this video. I hope this was helpful. This is my first time doing an investing video. I'm not an expert. I'm a developer, not an investment banker but I'm learning along the way. I'm reading this book where it talks about being an amateur and sharing things when you're an amateur. So that's basically what I'm doing. I hope this was helpful. Give this video a thumbs up if you enjoyed it at all. I wanna see more content like this. Subscribe to the channel if you haven't already. I really appreciate it if you all can become a part of this community. Hit that notification bell so you can know right away when I release a video and as always have a blessed rest of your week. I'll see you all soon. Peace.