In just a moment, AutoLite presents Suspense with Jimmy Cagney. Harlow, tonight I understand we have an AutoLite Suspense special. Every bit of special is your star performance as the AutoLite Resistor Spark Plug Maestro. Is that a plug for me or for my favorites AutoLite Resistor Spark plugs have? Hell, with no offense to either Harlow, it's neither. Tonight, Jimmy Cagney and AutoLite and Suspense are dramatizing one of our great American tragedies. It's so tremendous a problem it warrants our entire nation warring against its grimness and the grim reaper who is its symbol. Tonight's Suspense story will remind you to drive carefully behind AutoLite Resistor Spark plugs or any other, Harlow. Then let's join the AutoLite audience and listen. Suspense. AutoLite and its 60,000 dealers and service stations bring you Radio's Outstanding Theater of Thrill. Starting tonight, Mr. James Cagney in Anton Leader's production of No Escape. A tale well calculated to keep you in. Suspense. The only thing I can do now is tell you how it happened. Without any bunk. I don't care what you've heard or read about me. I'm not a devil or a mad dog. I don't know what people think happens to a fella. Do they think all of a sudden I turned into stone? I'm no different than anybody else. If I don't eat, I get hungry.  I'm just like the next guy and that's the whole idea. This, it happened to me, sure, but it would have happened to anybody. It could have happened to you. It was supposed to have been one of them days you circled on the calendar with a red pencil. You see, with a little town like ours, 23 miles from the big city right on the main highway, we get the speed artists going both ways. Yeah, and every couple of days they manage to leave something behind to remember them by. Like a kid with a broken back or well, well, you get the idea. So a couple of years ago, the Chamber of Commerce started a safety campaign to name the safest driver of the year. Something to kind of keep the guys in their toes. And this year, the fellow they chose for the award was yours truly. And tonight was the big doings with a few well-chosen words from me, a lad who was a public speaker, was a wonderful bus driver. I got to the house a little after six. Teddy, my kid brother, was just leaving. Hiya, Vickshaw. Hello, ladies and gentlemen in this corner of the world's champion driver. That's me all right. Hey, that's a swell picture of you in the paper. You don't look so bad for an older man. Right, I'll beat your ears in. Say you've called to say you should wear your blue suit and try to look human. That I would like to see me too. Sorry, I can't wait though. I'm late for a date. I'll see you in the morning and you can tell me how you slayed. All right, Ted, so long. I gave myself the words, shower, shave, the blue suit like the lady said. Eve looked left to me like I was at least five years old. I didn't mind a bit. Ever since Ma died in 42, I'd kept the house going for the Teddy because a kid needs something like that. But he was getting out of school in June and then maybe Eve and I... Well, it was nice thinking about it. So nice that I guess I forgot all about the time it was passing. Yeah? Look, slow motion. You should be halfway over here by now. Okay, Eve, honey. You got this beach ready?  Yes, Mama. Be right over. Eve lived outside of town. I'd really have to step on it to pick her up and spend some time rehearsing the speech and then get to the high school auditorium by eight. I got into the car and I decided to take the canyon road through the hills where there wasn't any traffic. I could make better time that way.  Let me get my thoughts together. I got to get this part exactly right. You've got to see it just like it happened, or else it's all a waste of time. All right. I was on the canyon road that wound up through the steep hills, the wall of the mountain on one side of the road, and the deep canyon on the other, about 10 to 7, but already dark. Nobody on the road but me, so I stuck pretty close to the middle. And every turn, the scream of the tires, but I wasn't worried about that. Four brand new tires, hardly a week old, and good brakes. I never take chances with things like that. Going about 50 miles an hour, maybe a little bit better. But I was all alone on the road, so what difference did it make? I was maybe two-thirds of the way up to the top, right where the road makes a wide curve. I remember I put a cigarette in my mouth and I pushed the dashboard lighter in. I heard the lighter click and I started reaching for it. And then a pair of headlights blazing out of nowhere. And then a screeching horn, a car coming the other way. I felt my inside double up like a fist. I slammed my foot on the brake, swung the steering wheel to the right. I didn't feel anything hit and I thought, oh, God, it's going to be OK. I jammed on the emergency. I jerked the door open. Now look back. The road was empty.  And at first, it didn't register with me. Well, maybe half a second I just stood there wondering what happened. Then I saw the reflection of the flame lighting up the whole canyon. I went to the side of the road and looked down. The car was about 500 feet below, burning. And the horn still blasting away like the driver's body had fallen against it. I started down the canyon. It was almost straight down. I fell and I rode. I came to my feet again. Why didn't that horn stop? Why didn't it stop? And then it did stop. And I realized that I had stopped. I had stopped, too. What was I waiting for? To get my wind, that's all. I went down another few feet. And then I stopped again, holding myself against the tree. Come on. Come on, Harry. Get going. No. No. What good would it do to get down there? I couldn't help it. I was in that car. It was too late. Nobody could help. Far down the road, I saw another pair of headlights starting the long climb. I went back to my car. I told myself I was going for help. I drove around to the top of the hill. There was a little gas station up there. I was almost there. An old fellow in white overalls was putting around the pumps. I started slowing down. My whole life was about to be smashed. I'd have to tell them the truth. What good would it do? What about Eve? What about my kid brother Teddy? What's more important than a man's own family? I reached the gravel driveway to the gas station. The old guy heard me coming and started straightening up. Now, I swung back onto the highway and pushed the accelerators to the floor. I got to Eve's house a little before 7.30. It was funny. I thought I was okay until I reached for the door handle. And then my finger seemed to go dead and my heart stopped. It started going a mile a minute. That's me. It was hard. Sorry, I'm late, Eve. Where in heaven's name have you been? Honestly, if you aren't the most aggravated... Harry Graham. What? Look at you.  I know. Let's go in and out. I'll clean up a little. What in the world happened? I had a flat tire. I had to change it on the road. Flat tire? Oh, fine. All right. Wait right here. I'll get the wisp room. All things to happen tonight. All right, all right. Happened. Lay you off, will you? Harry. I'm sorry. Well, don't just stand there. While I'm doing this, take your comb out and start combing your hair. Took my comb out and turned toward the whole mirror. Funny. Did it look any different than yesterday or the day before that? I was still Harry Graham. After... After he finished with me, we went back to the car. Get in.  Why don't you let me drive into town? Okay, if you want to. See, now I turn left at the next block, don't I, for the Canyon Road? Canyon Road? Yes, we can save some time going that way. No, no. Huh? No. No, I don't want to go to that Canyon Road. I want you to go the regular way. But we're going to be late.  I'll drive the car myself. Harry, we always...  All right.  What have you got against Canyon Road? It's too dangerous at night. Well, all I've got to say is that when they picked you for the safest driver of the year, Harry Graham, they really hit the jackpot. We got to the high school auditorium just a couple of minutes late. But it turned out we weren't the only ones late. We got to the main table. I saw that the chair next to mine was empty. Police Chief Blake, who was supposed to introduce me for my speech, hadn't showed up yet. And then when the dinner was ended, Chief Blake came through the door and he looked awfully. He went over to the chairman of the meeting and whispered something, pointing at me. And then he started for me and I thought my heart would quit beating. I was looking for a way to escape, maybe when... Hello, Harry. Oh, hello, Chief. Folks, folks, please. I'm sorry I'm so late. I've just come from Canyon Road. Another terrible accident. The car went over the canyon. Four people killed and burned. We still haven't gotten them out of the wreckage. It looks like they were forced off the road. Another dirty, hit-and-run case. My boys are up there now looking for traces of this other car. And I don't have to tell you that we're going to keep on looking till we find out who it was. That's why I had one of my boys bring me back to town here at this meeting tonight. Because now it's even more important to let a fellow like our friend Harry Graham here know we appreciate his good work and wish to the saints that were more like him. Yes, after what I just saw on Canyon Road, I'm really proud of Harry Graham. For suspense, Auto Light is bringing you Mr. James Cagney in Radio's Outstanding Theatre of Thrill's Suspense. This show hits with the zing of a set of Auto Light resistor spark plugs. It gets me right between the optics. I know. I've been doing a little research. Yes? The frigid facts on faulty driving should dispel the optical illusions of any automobile driver foolish enough to relax his vigilance for one single moment. Every 30 seconds a man, woman, or child is injured on our streets or highways. This year, 32,300 people are doomed to death. By Cornelius Hap, I never stopped to realize. You know, Harlow, it takes 10 seconds and 336 feet to stop a car traveling in 60 miles an hour? That's why brains are more important than brakes. Why, the man behind the wheel should be aware of the speed at which he's driving. Why, safe and sane, are synonymous words to drivers who value their fellow's lives as well as their own. In other words, Hap, just because Auto Light resistor spark plugs give your car more pep. Don't try to use all of it, eh? Exactly, Harlow. But there's more. An auspicious guy or gal who not only knows and keeps the rules of the road, but also keeps his temper in his head when some bungling bunny gives him the hog, the road hog treatment. Yes, Hap, it's sad but true that one right way to wrong driving is to always demand your highway rights. Be sure to be safe. Right, Harlow. And now let's get back to suspense. And now Auto Light brings back to our Hollywood soundstage Mr. James Cagney as Harry in No Escape. A tale well calculated to keep you in suspense. I had to keep my eyes on the table. I couldn't even look at the Chief as he stood there praising me. All I could see was that burning wreck at the foot of the cliff, and all I could hear was that awful horn blowing. I had to bite my lips to keep him screaming. I did it. Harry? What? Oh, what? Open your feet, son. We'd like to hear a few words from you. Yeah. All right, folks, I don't think anybody wants to listen to me tonight. Please, let's forget it. No, Harry.  Come on, Harry. But listen, listen. Go on, Harry. Oh, well, all right. I'm afraid I'm no great Shakespeare, the speechmaker. Just a lucky thing my girl's a good English teacher. I don't believe we should honor a man for safe driving any more than we should honor him with a gun. When a man gets behind the wheel of a car he doesn't give up his responsibilities to his fellow men. No one can escape the responsibility of being his brother's keeper. And that goes for... That goes for... Harry? What's wrong? Listen to me. How can I stand up here and read a speech after what Chief Blake just told us? No. I can't do it. I'm sorry. I can't do it. I guess Harry's right after all, folks. I guess maybe we just better call the meeting off. I know I've got to get back to Canyon Road as soon as I can. Come on, Eve. Come on. Let's get out of here. All right, honey. Yeah, Chief. You can do me a big favor. A fellow brought me down here. I had to beat it right back to the accident. Oh, so? I've got to get back down myself right away. Can you give me a lift? Well, I sure like to, Chief. I'm going home by the way of Canyon Road. We've gone that way before, honey. But I'd be much obliged to you, Harry. Harry? Okay, okay. Let's go. It's too bad the meeting had end like this. When I have a hunch you feel like I do, Harry. Like you can't sit still until you find the rat who killed those people. Well, I promise you this, Harry. Whoever he is, we'll get him. Wasn't that one for the book? Less than two hours after my accident with the other car going over into the canyon, I was back on Canyon Road. Only this time with Eve sitting behind me and the chief of police in back.  I promise you I won't give you a ticket. Okay, Chief. Honey, push the lighter in, will you? Lighter? For my cigarette. Oh, sure, sure. The speed better, Chief? Fine. Harry hates this road. I wanted him to take it earlier tonight. Well, it's all right if you got good tires. Oh, you don't have to worry about that. I had four brand-new ones put on just last week.  Oh, thanks. A voice didn't sound right. A voice didn't sound right. Then I remembered. When I picked her up tonight, I told the reason I was so messed up was that I'd had to change a tire. She was thinking about that now. I knew she was trying to figure out why I'd lied to her. Nobody said anything after that. I reached the part of the road just before it made the big bend. I started slowing down. I hope I got you here quick enough, Chief. Yeah, you did fine. Is this where it was? Yeah, just around this bend. Yeah, that's right. But how did... Huh? Nothing. Again, again I'd said the wrong thing. What was the matter with me? How was I supposed to know that that axon was around the bend? I was cutting my own throat, but now... Now I'd made the turn and there was the red flares burning on the road and a big crash truck at the edge of the canyon. And police cars blocking the highway. Just pull over the side, Harry. Okay. Ah, they're coming down there, Fraser. Oh, hello, Chief. You're ready to start bringing them up soon. That's a... That's a walkie-talkie he's working with? Yeah. He keeps contact with the men down in the canyon. Say, Harry, why don't you come along with me and really see how we work here? Oh, thanks, but I've got to get Yvonne home. The school teachers have got to get up early. Isn't that right, baby? I don't mind waiting if you'd like to stay. Yes, come along, Harry. I don't mind waiting, Harry. Now it was me against all of them. Oh, I was sick about that car down there in the canyon, those four bodies inside. But, well, nothing could change that now. And I was fighting for my own life. And they wouldn't break me down. I stood with my foot on the bumper in a cheap lake leaning against the fender of my car while his boys gave me their reports about the hit-and-run car and didn't bother me a bit. Two of them told about the plastic car and they made a tire mark they found on the road. Does it help you any, Chief? Not much, Harry. No tire. A lot of people have no tires. You, for instance. I kicked my new front tire for them. Kicked it hard. They brought over an old fellow in white overalls. The guy in the service station where I had almost turned in to report the accident. The chief asked him if he thought the car he'd seen was a hit-and-run. There must have been just about that time, you know. The way this fellow scooted away for no reason at all. I don't know what kind of a car it was, though. A black sedan, I'd say. Like this one, maybe? Well, might be. Might be that. But there's two darks, I'd be sure. Well, first thing tomorrow I'm gonna get myself a green convertible. Everybody got a good laugh out of that, but I would have to be careful. It mustn't go too far. It was me against all of them a guy might get from walking a tightrope. Thinking back now, sure seems screwy, but that's how I felt. And maybe that is the worst thing that happens to a guy in my spot. The way it turns you into a wild animal against the world. Hey, Charlie. With the fellow with the walkie-talkie over near the crash truck. Okay. Come on, Harry. Let's go over. Something flopped coldly in my stomach. And then lay still. This was the test. If they didn't break me down now, they could never do it, never in a million years. All the people who'd come up in the town started gathering around the crash truck. I wanted to run and never stop running. But I didn't move.  And I bit down hard on my lip till I tasted blood. And then the bundle rested on the ground. And everyone seemed to edge away from it like it could hurt them. And the cable went down into the valley again. And then there was a second bundle. And then there was a third. And then a fourth. And over and over like a drumbeat, like a prayer I told myself they wouldn't break me down. And then someone pushed forward from the crowd. Joe man down. A little tailor. He seemed shy and embarrassed as though he had no business being here. Chief Blake. Oh, yeah Joe. My boy Philip, he didn't come home for supper tonight. You want to look? Well, you know how a woman is. Rose will feel better if I tell her, okay, I looked and it wasn't. Well, you know. All right, Joe. Doesn't hurt none. Thank you. No. No. I'd better go back to my rose. Sorry, Joe. Wait a minute. Yes. Do you know who Phil was going to be with tonight? His best friend was Mike Roebuck. They were always together. The gold dust twins, everybody called him. Thanks, Joe. Excuse me, chief. I must go to Rose now. Praise her. Get back to town. Everything is wrong. Just see if Mike's home. Okay. I couldn't take any more. I started back for the car. My legs felt like they weighed a ton. I heard a sudden movement in the crowd behind me. They wouldn't break me down. They wouldn't break me down. I opened the car door and Eve was there. I'd almost forgotten her and I was sure she knew the truth. They brought up all four? I don't want to hear anything now. I'm taking you home. Wait, Harry. Listen, I'm telling you. Kiss me, Harry. Hold me and kiss me.  Hold me. All right, all right. Now stop it. Harry, if you know what's been going through my mind. Okay, okay. Now stop it.  Then when I saw you come back to the car, the look on your face. Oh, Harry. How could I have ever thought... All right, all right. Now, we'll talk about it later. I'll never talk about it again. Never, Harry. So, it was all over with. I was going to be okay. God, I wasn't proud. I felt rotten and sick. And now that it was all over, the strength ran out of me like water running out of a glass. But what good would it have done to crucify myself? It wouldn't have changed anything. I wasn't a bad guy. It could have happened to anybody. And now, now I was going to be able to take care of my own Eve and my kid brother Teddy. Was that a bad guy? A fellow who wanted to do right for his family? I started the car. I put in gear and then look at me through the windows. It was Chief Blake. Signaling me to wait. I turned the key off. Whatever it was, I was very tired. Come on out, Harry. I've got to get Eve home. Come on out of the car. Harry, do like I tell you. Come with me. What do you want? Come with me. When you drove up here tonight, I didn't think it would end like this. You know about it? Listen, you've got to believe me. It shouldn't have happened to a fellow like you. You've got to hear my side. Right here, Harry. What? Take a look at this fourth body. Why should I? Pull the blanket back, Harry. Oh. No. No. Teddy. That's it. The whole works. I don't care what you heard or read in the papers. That's the story. Just like it happened, no bunk. And thinking back, I guess I kind of hit the nail on the head in that speech that I made that night. You know, that part about no man can ever escape the responsibility of being his brother's keeper. Thank you, James Cagney, for a magnificent performance. Mr. Cagney will return in just a moment. Well, after that performance of Jimmy Cagney's and your heartfelt expressions on the rights and wrongs of the driving man, it's hard to switch the conversation to auto-light resistor spark plugs. I'm sure you'll find a way. Yes, I think I'll just say friends, switch to a set of auto-light resistor spark plugs just as quickly as you can swing into a service station. When you replace your narrow gap spark plugs with wide gap auto-light resistor spark plugs, your car will idle smoother. Give you better luck with lean gas mixtures. Actually save you gas dollars. Once more, auto-light resistor spark plugs cut down spark plug interference with radio and television reception. Switch to auto-light resistor spark plugs today. And remember, auto-light means spark plugs. Ignition engineered resistor spark plugs. Auto-light means batteries. Say full batteries. Auto-light means ignition system. The lifeline of your car. And now here again is Mr. James Cagney. It's always a pleasure to appear on suspense, but I was especially pleased when Tony Leader asked me to do tonight's story. That's because I feel strongly about the kind of thing that happened to Harry Graham. I believe that any person who gets behind the wheel of a car assumes a great responsibility to himself, to his family, to his fellow men. That one moment of carelessness or recklessness or drunkenness can mean a lifetime of pain and misery for someone. And it might be you or me. Yes, when you're driving an automobile we are our brother's keeper. Over the holiday season and all the time drive carefully. Next week on Radio's Outstanding Theater of Thrills Herbert Marshall will appear in a story with a Christmas atmosphere. Another study in James Cagney is now appearing in the photo play of William Saroyan's prize stage hit The Time of Your Life. Copies of tonight's suspense play No Escape by Larry Marcus will be available for educational use by groups interested in highway safety. They may be obtained by Writing, Suspense, the Columbia Broadcasting System, Hollywood, California. Music was composed by Lucian Morrowack and conducted by Lud Blusken. The entire production was under the direction of Anton M. Leader. In the coming weeks, suspense will present such stars as Ronald Coleman, Robert Montgomery, Dana Andrews and Frank Sinatra. Make it a point to listen each Thursday to Suspense, Radio's Outstanding Theater of Thrills. And next Thursday, same time, here Herbert Marshall. Suspense show? All right, Mr. Wilcox. Auto Light and CBS wish to thank the radio editors and columnists of America for electing suspense as the best mystery show annual balloting conducted by Motion Picture Daily for the magazine Fame. Good night. Switch to Auto Light. This is CBS, the Columbia Broadcasting System.


Hello everybody, welcome back to another Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2021 tutorial and this one I'm going to show you how to add a song to any track or any video inside Premiere Pro. It's very easy to do. Let's just follow along with me here. I'm in the editing workspace as you can see here and the first thing I'm going to do is I've brought in some footage. I'm now going to double click inside the project panel and it is going to pop up a option to add content. I can add in video, images, music, etc. For me, I've got my music on my desktop and then the ones that I'm going to use for this video are in something called the Music Bend folder. So I'm just going to go ahead and add in one of these songs. Let's go with this one, Elven Cliffs. Okay, good. We've added a song. It's a lot longer than this video clip. No worries. The next step is I'm going to click on the song and I'm going to drag and drop it underneath the audio track. So I've put it on audio too. If your video does not have any audio attached, you can just drop it into the audio one slot. It doesn't really matter. Now you're going to notice here that the audio is a lot longer than the video. So I'm going to go out here to the end of it. I'm going to right-left click on it and I'm going to pull it. Holding down the shift key so that it snaps to the length of the video. So the audio and the video are the same length. Let's hit spacebar and quickly hear what we got. Okay, good. That is honestly all there is to it.


I'm a Nigerian originally from Nigeria but I live in Finland and I came to India in 2001 and went straight to Kerala for seven-a-side and after that I went to Goa to play with Sporting Club to Goa. I never have a clue about Indians. I came and I saw it different world entirely so I start from there. I'm just here to play I want to see how good I am and that's where I start from and I'm here to play for the team and to help the team as much as I can and I really enjoy I have a bit of my stay right here now. The crowd are amazing and the club also is amazing and you know it's like one of the best team in the in Indian League and I like Indian mostly. You know it's good to be here and it's a very interesting place to be.


$42,000. Let's watch it last. Let me look at the market. The option. The option. Oh no, the option. No, not yet. Then take it out. You go back and look at that because it's pulling in. The market's pulling in. The market hasn't made a move yet. And I don't know what it is. It isn't, it isn't. Leave it said. Leave it said. Let it say. Here, BBY. Forget it. Go right to the BBY. Yeah, for the BBY. Okay, this goes to $41,000. Okay. What's the average price? It's $42.50 is my average. It's three times 3,000 shares right now. What's your name? Right on the top of your head. You have to know that you have to think. You can't even decide a kid. I've got too many other things to think about. Too many other things to think about. It's $3,000. It's $4,500. It certainly is, yes. That's exactly what it is. It is. We hit two people. You could be in that one. I'm going to move it off because BBY was the one. And we'll go over this later. It was beautiful and everyone should be in it. And you could be out of it, actually. It got to the first target. I'm going to direct Phillip here. Soap does an amazing job. Susanne just made $950. She's out. Great job, Susanne. And here we go with wonderful start to March. And you're not going to believe what the calendar said today. I'm willing to let you know what is no longer necessary in my life. Here it goes. What a quality job that I've made. Yep, I'm doing it. Hold 41 now. I'm just saying. How much do you want? Just short $1,500. Okay, let it go. Nearly $16,000. Let it go. But you better get out of it when I scream too. $17,000. Pay attention. $18,000. Pay attention. Pay attention. This is it. This is the morning move. $2,000. $10,000. $19,000. Come on. A little bit longer. Take it. Take it. Take it. Take it. $18,000. Close the avatar. What was that? $1,500? Yeah, somewhere in that region. But obviously when you press the button and it takes you out of the market, you lose it. I know. I know. I don't use this thing. I use hot keys though. You trade a little bit differently. Yeah, I do. The limits. I am from that, to be taken out. Okay, well we'll talk about that more later. Yeah, we'll talk about that more later. Yeah, we'll talk about that more later.


Let's look at an example of how a baseball game would actually play out. If you've been following my intro to baseball playlist I've been explaining a lot of different concepts Individually and sometimes I know it can be tough to understand how they all work together So let's try to take it step by step here and see how a baseball game would actually flow One of the first things you'll notice when you turn a baseball game on on television or the internet is that you'll have some Sort of scoreboard on the screen which is convenient because you can turn on a game and regardless of where things are In the game you can tell what that a matter of seconds everything that's going on And if you go to a game in person these things will probably be on the scoreboard there, too They just might look a little different This will include a few things first is the teams so the visiting teams listed first and the home team second just like All American sports are it will also say which inning it is So we'll start with first inning and it'll either say if it's the top or the bottom of the inning Or it'll have an arrow to that effect It'll also have the count which again is how many balls there are and how many strikes there are the number of outs Which may also be in dots and then they'll have a diagram showing which bases have runners on them Also within the last few years most broadcasts have started to include how many pitches a pitcher has thrown But we're gonna leave that out for now Our purple team being the home team will start in the field first both teams will have their batting orders So whoever the first hitter is on yellow team will come up to bat this being the beginning of the game He starts out with no outs no count nobody on base So the pitcher will throw his first pitch and we'll say this is ball one again A ball is a pitch that is not in the strike zone and the batter doesn't swing at which means the count is now one and Oh, so the catcher would then throw the ball back to the pitcher and he would throw his second pitch Let's say the batter swings and misses now the count is one and one one ball one strike Again the catcher would throw the ball back to the pitcher and let's say now the batter hits the next pitch into right field He'll run to first base and this is a single the right fielder will pick the ball up He'll throw the ball back into the second baseman who will throw it back to the pitcher So our scoreboard will now add a little marker to show that there is now a runner on first base And the count will reset back to oh and oh for the second batter So the pitcher throws his first pitch to the second batter and he's gonna hit it to the third baseman a ground ball Who will field the ball and then throw the ball to the second baseman who is now covering second base Remember, there's now a force out at second base So now that the second baseman has caught the ball and stepped on the base the runner who was on first base is now out We have our first out on the scoreboard and our batter is safe at first base So our little first base icon stays there down on the scoreboard The second baseman will throw the ball back to the pitcher and the third batter comes up Let's see. He takes the first pitch meaning he doesn't swing and it's called strike one So now it's on one The next pitch he hits the ball off of the wall And the runner who started on first base runs to third and then the batter will run to second base for a double So our fourth batter comes up And sometimes the fourth batter is called the cleanup hitter because he uses a broom handle to hit instead of a bat That's not really true So let's say with his bat he hits the ball a fly ball to right field And both runners can see from where it's going that it's probably going to be caught by the right fielder So they stand on their respective bases and as soon as the ball is caught they tag up and run Potentially the right fielder could throw either one of them out But these guys are both very fast and so he'll just throw back into the infield So lots of things happen here. The first thing is that we have our hitter is out That's the second out of the inning our runner on second base runs to third And a runner on third base has just tagged up And ran home to step on home plate and score run And therefore we would classify this not as a fly out for the batter, but as a sacrifice fly One thing to note is that as we saw there the number of things that can happen and therefore the potential for crazy plays is increased As the number of runners on base increases Our next hitter comes up to bat and he hits a foul ball. This is strike one Count as 0 and 1. Let's say he takes the second pitch outside Which means it's off the plate on the opposite side of the hitter An inside pitch on the other hand would be thrown between the hitter and home plate Anyway, it's now one ball and one strike and the batter hits the next pitch Over the fence into the stands for our home run The runner on third base will draw home and score And the batter will run all the way around the bases and come around to score a second run on the play So now it's three to nothing still two outs Our next hitter comes up and he hits a ground ball to the shortstop who throws to the first baseman for the out The third out of the top of the first inning thus concluding this half inning There would then be a commercial break and when that's over the yellow team will be in the field playing defense The purple team will come up to bat in the bottom of the inning Play nine of those innings and you have yourself a baseball game


Soy foods have become controversial in recent years, even among health professionals exacerbated by misinformation found on the internet. Chief among the misconceptions is that soy foods promote breast cancer because they contain a class of phytoestrogen compounds called acoflavones. Since estrogens can promote breast cancer growth, it's natural to assume phytoestrogens might, too, but people don't realize there are two types of estrogen receptors in the body, alpha and beta. Unlike actual estrogens, soy phytoestrogens preferentially bind to and activate estrogen receptor beta. This distinction is important because the two types of receptors have different tissue distributions and often function differently and sometimes in opposite ways. And this appears to be the case in the breast, where beta activation has an anti-estrogenic effect inhibiting the growth-promoting effects of actual estrogen. Having we've known for more than 10 years, there's no excuse anymore. Effects of estradiol, the primary human estrogen, on breast cells are completely opposite to those of soy, phytoestrogens, which have anti-proliferative effects on breast cancer cells, even at the low concentrations one gets in one's bloodstream eating just a few servings of soy. Which makes sense, given that after eating a cup of soy means the levels in our blood cause significant beta receptor activation. So where did this outdated notion that soy could increase breast cancer risk come from? The concern was based largely on research that showed that the main soy phytoestrogen genestine stimulates the growth of mammary tumors in a type of mouse, but it turns out we're not actually mice. We metabolize soy isoflavones very differently from rodents. The same soy leads to 20 to 150 times higher levels in the bloodstream of rodents. The breast cancer mouse in question was 58 times higher. So if you ate 58 cups of soybeans a day, you could get some significant alpha activation too, but thankfully we're not hairless atomic over-reacted mice, and we don't tend to eat 58 cups of soybeans a day. At just a few servings of soy a day, with the excess beta activation we would assume soy would actively help prevent breast cancer, and indeed soy intake during childhood. Adolescents and adult life were each associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. Those women who ate the most soy in their youth appear to grow up to have less than half the risk. This may help explain why breast cancer rates are so much higher here than in Asia, yet when Asians come over to the US to start eating and living like Americans, their risk shoots right up. For example, women in Connecticut, way up the top of the breast cancer risk, keep in their 50s, have like 10 times more breast cancer than women in their 50s living in Japan, but it's not just genetics. Since when they move here, their breast cancer rates go up generation after generation as they assimilate into our culture. Are the anti-estrogenic effects of soy foods enough to actually change the course of the disease? We didn't know until the first human study on soy food intake and breast cancer survival was published in 2009 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggesting that among women with breast cancer, soy food consumption was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and breast cancer recurrence, followed by another study, and then another, all with similar findings. That was enough for the American Cancer Society, who brought together a wide range of cancer experts to offer nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors, concluding that if anything, soy foods should be beneficial, and since then, two additional studies have been published for a total of 5, and they all point in the same direction, 5 out of 5 tracking more than 10,000 breast cancer patients. Pooling all the results, soy food intake after breast cancer diagnosis was associated with reduced mortality, meaning a longer lifespan and reduced recurrence, so less likely the cancer comes back. Anyone who says otherwise hasn't cracked a journal open in seven years. And this improved survival was for both women with estrogen receptor negative tumors and estrogen receptor positive tumors, and for both younger women and for older women, pass the edamame.


IOT is a practitioner of shamanic rights and energy healer. I think starting the new year in the right way is the best thing anybody can do. And if you would like to start the new year, balancing, harmonious, clearing, cleaning chakras, soothing your nervous system, healing old wounds and finding ways that you have way more peaceful capacity and clarity about your path and direction. And that's by the way just some of the benefits of doing shamanic work. Then I ask you please to join me. I'm Debbie Daschinger. I am a certified shamanic energy practitioner. I've been working with groups. I've been working with people. In the beginning, someone was working on me before I became certified in all of this and it was life changing. I remember my Peruvian shaman saying to me over the eight months that we worked together, Debbie, this work seems so simple, but it's so profound. And she was right. I saw myself constantly shifting and changing and my world growing. I'm so pleased with my life right now. And I want that for you too. I've also seen with the people that I have worked with what is magnificent, whether it's in privates or groups to a person, everybody states that no matter how they started in the class, by the time we're done with the class in the one hour session, they're remarkably different and peaceful. I think we could all use a lot of peace right now. And that peace, by the way, builds every week that we work together. I am opening another class in the new year and I am inviting you to join and I'm inviting you to really special time. I'm about to go to Mexico City to a 4,000 person event and I've been asked to speak on stage and I am speaking about shamanism and I am offering the attendees for that weekend only a special price, a half off price. So this is incredibly affordable for everybody. I look so forward to working with you and helping you. And if you'll go to the website, you'll see all the beautiful, yummy things that are gonna be offered. I'm doing this right now because I wanna offer you for right now until I'm finished speaking this special price so you can get half off too. What a beautiful way for you to know you can start the new year. Shamanism is something that is so near and dear to my heart and it has helped me tremendously. I've seen it help my clients, my friends and I'd like to offer an open door, extend a warm welcome to you to join. Wouldn't that be beautiful if right now you know that in the new year you've got six delicious one hour sessions in a group where you get to be focused on, you get to receive, you get to shift, you get to grow. The website is myvisibility.site slash shamanic. You could see it at the bottom of my screen. Myvisibility.site slash shamanic. I'm Debbie Dashinger. I believe so much in this work that I'm willing to extend an outrageous situation.  Don't worry, I got you. They're really powerful by the way. Really powerful for letting things go. And any traumas you have, any wounds you have, we work on those as well. New year, new you. Are you in? I hope so. And I can't wait to get to meet you and to share this exquisite, powerful, ancient work with you. There is a reason why, for me, it's in the Inca lineage, why they have released this. It's part of a prophecy, literally for this time. And so I'm fully on board as part of my mission to help folks heal, to help them shift, to help them remember, remember why they're here and what they came here to do and how magnificent you truly are. I hope you will join me. My visibility.site slash shamanic. New year, new you. This will be just magnificent.


right? So we have to charge money in order to give the coils to people, right? So the coils start at $399 and if you compare that to other people selling the same similar, not the same, similar technology, usually it's not as good as us. Actually all of them are not as good as ours. They're charging $800 to $900 for the same thing, okay? Same or less. So when you think about the prices, you have to also consider who are you comparing this with? What other modalities are you comparing this with? And then you can, you know, decide whether it's affordable or not, okay? USA is different. You look like La Bamba. Who's La Bamba?


Our military should be the most prepared in the world. And as your Senator, I promise to support those brave men and women who fight every day for massive earmark spending. Like a few years ago, we spent over $6 billion making 2,000 tanks that the Army specifically told Congress they didn't want or didn't need. That is prepared.


One of the more interesting laws in the Torah is found in the book of Numbers chapter 35 and the book of Deuteronomy chapter 4 where we learn about the Are Nikvlat, the cities of refuge. If someone kills unintentionally they had to flee to one of these cities and were told there were six of them, three on one side of the Jordan River, three on the other side of the Jordan River, and in these cities of refuge the person who killed unintentionally would be safe from any relative of the victim that might be seeking revenge. What's strange is that later on in the Torah in the book of Deuteronomy chapter 19 verse 9 we're told that at some point in Jewish history we're going to add three additional cities of refuge and the question is why? Why will there be at some future point nine cities of refuge rather than six? So the passage in Deuteronomy chapter 19 is introduced by telling us that it's speaking about a time when God will expand our borders because all of the people of Israel are observing and obeying the commandments of the Torah. My mononies and many others suggest that this chapter Deuteronomy 19 is speaking about what will be taking place in the Messianic age. It will be in the Messianic age when we will add three additional cities of refuge. Now this is actually very perplexing because we would assume that at a time when, as the prophet Isaiah describes in chapter 11, when the wolf will lie down with the lamb and we're told there will be world peace, why at a time like that will we have additional cities of refuge? We would have thought that perhaps at a time when the whole world will be living at peace and there'll be not more killing going on but probably less killing going on so we would assume maybe there should be fewer cities of refuge. Maybe eliminate them altogether. But why go from six to nine? Why add three additional cities of refuge at a time that we are describing as the Messianic age, a time of world peace? This problem is similar to a problem that we have with the Yom Kippur liturgy. Yom Kippur, the day of atonement in the Jewish calendar, takes place at the end of 40 days of intense spiritual work and preparation. 10 days before Yom Kippur is Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. And this 10-day period of time is called the Aserikim Echuva, the 10 days of repentance where Jewish people do tremendous introspection, moral stock-taking and they work on repenting and changing, getting rid of their negative behaviors, returning to God, improving their behaviors. And this entire 10-day period of time is preceded by the entire month of Elul, 30 days of preparation. So we have here a 40-day period of time when in the Jewish world there is intense introspection and stock-taking and working to improve ourselves. Yom Kippur is the last of these days. And what happens toward the end of Yom Kippur, we have the afternoon prayer service called Mincha and the Torah is read. Now this is the very end of this 40-day period of intense spiritual work and improvement. What is it that the rabbis decided we should read in the synagogue on Yom Kippur at the end of the day, at the end of this 40-day period of spiritual work and repentance? Strikingly, the rabbis ask us to read Leviticus chapter 18, which is a long chapter describing sexual prohibitions ranging from not having sexual relations with our parents or with animals and everything in between. Now we would have thought that on this incredibly spiritual day, at the end of 40 days of intense spiritual work, this is not the kind of message we would need. We would think that maybe a more sublime, a more spiritual message would be more appropriate. Why do we need to hear at the end of this 40 days, at the very end of Yom Kippur, that you know what, it's important to remember you shouldn't sleep with your mother. Don't sleep with your cow. I believe that these problems are very similar. Why is it that during the Messianic age, when humanity has reached a very high level, we're living in peace with each other? Why do we have to have additional cities of refuge for people who might kill accidentally? And why on the holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur? Do we have to read about these incredibly perverse sexual prohibitions that we wouldn't consider doing on our worst day of the year? I believe the answer to these questions is similar. Both situations are discussing what happens when you are on a very high level. And the problem when you're on a high level is how do you stay there? How do you stay on the high ground once you're there already? And one of the great problems is if people that have reached a high level convince themselves that they've arrived, they've finished the race, and now they can relax and take it easy, they are setting themselves up for a fall. The great danger of reaching a high level is that you can become complacent and assume that you are such a high person now, you're in such a high level, that you could never imagine doing something terrible. We know that physically, if someone is on a high place, let's say we've always seen the movie, someone who's at the edge of the 88th floor of a building, and there's a big crowd down on the street below, and everyone is looking up at this person at the ledge. And in order to make sure that the person doesn't fall off the ledge, they're going to start screaming at him, don't look down, don't look down, because if someone's on a high level physically, and you want to ensure they don't fall, you tell them don't look down.  If you convince yourself that you're unable to fall down, you will fall down. So during the Messianic Age, we're not going to have more cities of refuge because they're going to be actually more killings going on, but they will be a sign for us in order to let everyone remember that if we're not careful in the Messianic Age, even then it would be possible to take a life, God forbid. And the same thing happens at the end of Yom Kippur, at the end of these 40 days of intense spiritual work, in order to just let us leave realizing that we're not going to be stuck on that high level we've reached. We need to be vigilant, we need to work hard to stay there. And one of the things that Arturo teaches us in order to help us stay on the high level once we've climbed up for so many, so many days is to look down and to realize, God forbid, if we're not careful, we're capable of committing the most terrible sins.


O say can you see by the dawn's early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming, Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight, O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming, And the rocket's red glare, o'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming. And the rocket's red glare, o'er the ramparts we watched


Hello friends, I am Sanjay Gupta. In this video I am going to demonstrate you how you can print the list of prime numbers which are available in array. Before starting, you can note my information, you can follow or subscribe my YouTube channel through this URL youtube.com slash sanjaygupta underscore tax school. You can download my programming app Takamis which is available on Google Play. Now coming on to the topic, in this video I will be demonstrating you how you can print the list of prime numbers which are available in array. For that purpose, first I am including a header file that is stdn.h then inside main function I am going to implement an array. Size is 10 then i, j and a variable f which will be used for flag then I am using printf which will display the masses. Enter elements on console then for loop this for loop will repeat scanner statements so that 10 elements can be received and all the elements will be stored inside array a. So with the help of this for loop all the elements will be received and all the elements will be stored at different indexes which are available inside array. Now I am going to implement the concept of nested loop so that I can print the list of prime numbers which are available in the array. So first I am implementing a loop starting from 0 it will repeat 10 times because adding is containing 10 numbers. I am again declaring a variable n so here I am assigning a of i into n so n will be receiving first element of array then I am initializing f with 0 then I am implementing for loop j equals to 2 j less than n and j plus plus so this is the condition of prime number because prime number the number which is prime it is divisible by 1 and itself that's why I am starting loop from 2 and it is repeating less than n times so n is containing the element which is available inside array so suppose a of 0 index is containing a number 11 so n will be receiving 11 loop will start from 2 and it will repeat till 10 so from 2 to 10 all the numbers will be available for the division so that we can check whether the number is prime or not so inside this loop I am going to implement if condition n modulus j w equals to 0 so I am trying to divide n with j if it is divisible then I am changing the value of f to 1 and I am breaking the loop so this is the j loop which is checking whether the number is prime or not so here n is divisible by j if it is completely divisible then f will become 1 and loop will be terminated so after this loop I have to check the value of f so if f w equals to 0 it means this if condition is false all the times and if this if condition is true then only f will be containing 1 so if this condition is true that is f w equals to 0 then I can print percent d is prime and I am printing value of n so this way you can see I have implemented the complete code at last I am writing return 0 so here you can see n is receiving a number then f is initialized with 0 every time whenever this j loop will be beginning j is checking whether the number is divisible by j or not if it is divisible then f will become 1 otherwise it will remain 0 so if f is 0 after completion of j loop then I can print number which is available inside n variable that it is prime and then I will be incremented and another value of array will be assigned into n for checking so this way all 10 elements which are available in array will be checked and those numbers which are prime will be displayed on console now I am executing this code you can see it is asking for 10 elements so I am entering 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 and 20 you can see the list 11 is prime 13 is prime 17 is prime and 19 is prime so 12 14 16 18 and 20 all six numbers are not prime and 11 13 17 and 19 are prime numbers if you want to display these results on separate lines you can apply slash and here so again I am executing this code again I am entering 10 numbers you can see the result 11 13 17 and 19 are prime and other elements are not prime so four numbers are prime out of these 10 numbers and six numbers 12 14 15 16 18 and 20 are not prime so this way I have checked all the elements which are available inside array and the and only those numbers which are prime are displayed on console and remaining elements are not displayed so this way I hope you have understood how you can check which element is prime available in array or which are not prime which are available inside array if you want to watch more programming related videos you can follow my youtube channel through the URL that is youtube.com slash sanjay gupta underscore you can also download my programming app Techimus which is available on google play so keep connected with me learn programming because programming is very easy thank you for watching this video


ni'nicswp gyda mae hynny, ond yn syr fan hyn yn ei petholces iawn, ac yn uwch, neud iechyd mae y pethau yn gwybodaeth gyda ni'mu ac ein stryd yn hynny. That next question is question 1, Kezia Dugdale. To ask the Deputy First Minister what engagements he has planned for the rest of this glorious day. The first minister is currently in the United States on Government business, and has asked me to answer questions on her behalf. Later today, I will travel to Rottus yn ei prifodol i gaelGovernodau Arfer, oherwydd i yn ddechrau i'r honi Ffocw Leland Rhath Ellieag yn gadob gyda'r dderfnyddio. Gwisiddodd Duc Ddol? Y journalists' y Push News published today confirms that two thirds of North Sea operators have been forced to cancel projects because of the recent fall in Oil Price. That's bad news for the industry, the economy of the North-east and for thousands of oil workers and their families. They need to know what the future holds for Scotland's oil and gas industry. Can the Deputy First Minister confirm when an updated oil and gas bulletin will be published? I can confirm that. The Government is considering the implications of the United Kingdom Government's budget back in March, which contained substantial changes to the taxation arrangements of the North Sea oil and gas sector. Once we have confirmed the extent of those changes and the implications of those changes, which obviously will flow through, into what we hope will be investment decisions made by companies given the fact that there has been such radical change in the taxation regime of the North Sea, the Government will publish the next version of the oil and gas tax bulletin. Presiding Officer, I did not hear a date there. The truth is that the SNP Government has had time to do the work. It has been one excuse after another. That is the fourth time in this chamber that somebody in his seat has refused to do that. Once upon a time you could not move for SNP oil bulletins, but since the collapse in the oil price, we have had nothing but radio silence. That may be because the collapsing oil price has demolished the SNP's economic credibility. We now know that the SNP will amend the Scotland bill to push for full fiscal autonomy within the UK. Something the right-wing Tory-backed benches will cheer because it means the end of the Barnett formula. Can the Deputy First Minister tell us what the oil price needs to be to balance the books under full fiscal autonomy? The first thing that I would say to Kezia Dugdale is that the Government publishes an annual oil and gas bulletin that reflects the changes to the North Sea oil and gas tax arrangements. The UK Government made very substantial changes to the taxation regime back in March. We want to see the implications of that in the oil and gas sector. That is necessary because there is every opportunity for companies to change their investment decisions because the UK Government has accepted the fact that it has got the taxation regime so badly wrong in 2011 that it has now changed those arrangements. When it comes to the issue of full fiscal autonomy, I think that Kezia Dugdale should learn the lesson from the fact that she has been going on and on and on about full fiscal autonomy for nine months all the way up to the general election and the Labour Party delivered the worst performance that they have delivered in 90 years in this country with a hemorrhage of their vote and the loss of 40 of their 41 seats. That tells me that Kezia Dugdale is out of touch with public opinion in Scotland. The Office of Budget Responsibility published in a full fiscal analysis within 24 hours. We have not seen one from this Government in over a year. We have got tired of waiting for this Government to do a fiscal analysis, so we have published our own. I hear cries of Mickey Mouse that it is not credible that they should listen because this is being verified by SPICE and independent experts. This is the oil paper that the SNP Government will not print. He did not answer my question, so let me give him the answer. We would need a global oil price of $200 to balance Scotland's books under the SNP's plans for full fiscal autonomy. So disastrous is the SNP's policy that is predicated on an oil price that has never been reached before. This is a number that has been approved by SPICE so that they can laugh all they like, but it is the reality of the situation. A Labour amendment to the Scotland Bill would establish an independent expert commission to look at the impact of full fiscal autonomy on Scotland's public finances. It would not have any politicians or any Government employees on it. The Scottish people would then have once and for all a full expert analysis of the impact of full fiscal autonomy. So can the Deputy First Minister tell us whether or not the SNP will back that amendment? Of course, it will be interesting to see what degree of dialogue and discussion there has been between the Labour Party and the Conservative Party about taking forward that amendment, because that would just be what I witnessed on Monday when I was in the House of Commons, the continuation of the Better Together Alliance between the Labour Party and the Tories over the Scotland Bill. I would have thought that the Labour Party might have learned a lesson from the Better Together Alliance. The Better Together Alliance has been described as a disaster for the electoral performance of the Labour Party in Scotland. If Kezia Dugdale is interested in taking forward a rational and considered discussion about full fiscal autonomy, I suggest that she only has to look at her back benches. Alex Rowley, speaking in the devolution committee debate on 21 May, said that the Scottish Government has put forward a stronger case and has a case for full fiscal autonomy. That is where the problem arises for the Labour Party. I am keen to move away from the politics of fear and have a discussion. What the Labour Party comes here, week in, week out, is to peddle the politics of fear. It did not work in the general election and it will not work now. In all that anger and all that posturing, I think that the answer was no. This is a finance secretary afraid of the verdict of impartial economists, running scared of the consequences of his own policy. What does it mean that £7.6 billion is worth of cuts over and above what the Tories are offering? Why? Because the truth of full fiscal autonomy is known by his colleagues in Westminster. It is the SNP constitution spokesperson who said that it would be a disaster. It was his new MP for East Lodian who described it as economic suicide. This is less about North Sea oil and more about the SNP's snake oil. He is trying to punt at something that he knows to be dodgy. For the sake of Scotland's schools and hospitals, should the Deputy First Minister not abandon this disastrous plan for full fiscal autonomy? It is interesting to listen to Kezia Dugdale's question that she uses language, which falls into the category of language that her leadership counterpart or her leadership rival, Ken McIntosh, talked about, as being about the negativity of the Labour Party defining itself against the Scottish National Party. That whole approach has been tried for months after months after months, and it has not worked for the Labour Party. What fiscal autonomy is about is about building on the powers of this Parliament, powers that over the past 16 years have seen an improvement in the economic performance of Scotland, where our GDP per head used to be sixth in the United Kingdom and it is now third in the United Kingdom, only behind London and the south-east, where productivity has increased from 96 per cent of UK levels in 1999 to being in line with UK levels in 2012. The moral of the story is that, where we can exercise distinctive economic policies in Scotland, we can transform the economic performance of our country. For me, that is what fiscal autonomy is all about. It is about enabling this Parliament to take the decisions that are right for Scotland, not to be at the mercy of a chancellor, a Tory chancellor that comes along one Thursday and takes £100 million out of our budget without a buyer leave. I want this Parliament to decide our own economic future and the Labour Party should see the opportunity of that for the people of our country. Ruth Davidson, to ask the Deputy First Minister when he will next meet the Secretary of State for Scotland. I met the Secretary of State for Scotland on Monday and we speak by telephone on a weekly basis. We know that standards of literacy and numeracy in our primary schools are falling. Even the First Minister said that she was frustrated that we do not have as much data for our primaries as we do for our secondary schools. That clearly has to change. One of our leading literacy experts, Professor Sue Ellis, told the Parliament this week that having a national bank of surveys and tests that schools can use as they see fit was, and I quote, one of the most useful things that you can do. Scotland does not have those kinds of tests right now. I think that we should, along with national testing, so that parents and policy makers have a far clearer picture of how pupils are progressing at every stage of their education. Does the Deputy First Minister agree? Where I agree with Ruth Davidson, the point that the First Minister made in response to Ruth Davidson on 21 May, is that there is not sufficient nationally held information on the performance of school pupils in the primary sector. I need to improve the availability of that information. That information exists child by child. It is obviously the subject of discussion between parents and teachers in the interaction that we would all expect, which takes place in our schools, the length and breadth of our country, about the performance of individual children. That is absolutely essential information to satisfy parents that children are progressing satisfactorily through the education system. However, where there is a weakness, that information is not collated and collected nationally, and that is the area that the Government is currently exploring. Obviously, the input of Dr Ellison to that process is the input that the Government will consider carefully. Ruth Davidson, the Deputy First Minister is right that I raised this in May. The reason that I am raising it again is because we need a clear direction from the Scottish Government and at the moment we are simply not getting it. First of all, we had the Education Secretary using a speech to publicly praise international education systems that employ rigorous testing and said that, for Scotland, and I quote, nothing is off the table. The First Minister then told me on 21 May that she wants more data on what is happening in our primary schools and she did not rule out further testing. However, this weekend, the leader of Scotland's largest teaching union revealed that he had been given, and I will quote directly, a categorical assurance from the Education Secretary that such testing would not happen. It seems that this Government is saying one thing to policy makers, another thing to Parliament and something different entirely to the teaching unions of this country. I appreciate that the First Minister is not here to give her answer, but can I ask the Deputy First Minister what is the Scottish Government's actual position on primary school testing? Back in the 13 May, Angela Constance answered Mr Buchanan in a topical question where she said, the Government's position is not to reintroduce things such as national testing, which is onerous for teaching staff and children. We need to address the need for more intelligent use of information. The First Minister then said to Ruth Davidson on 21 May that I am not, though, simply going to give Ruth Davidson a yes or no answer or jump to making decisions before we have properly considered what the right thing to do is. We need a new national performance framework, but we must ensure that the data that we are collecting and the way in which we are collecting it are right, proportionate and sensible. Mr Flanagan in the Herald newspaper at the weekend said, the Government wants to look at what data is in the system and use it more effectively, and they want to look at the role of different assessment, and we have no difficulty with that. What is happening is that the Government is doing what I think the public would expect us to do, which is to discuss the issue with a range of different stakeholders, to take their opinions and to establish that new national performance framework. In answer to Ruth Davidson, the Government is developing that new national performance framework and we will share information with Parliament once that process is completed. What Ruth Davidson should be assured about, and I hope that the parents of Scotland are assured about, is that the Government's absolute determination to work with our education system, with parents, with pupils and with stakeholders to improve educational performance and educational attainment in Scotland. That lies at the heart of the Government's agenda. Is this the question? Mark Doffreyser. The Deputy First Minister will be aware from media reports that Tayside doctors have claimed that the health board have manipulated waiting time figures by barring surgical teams from seeing patients, potentially putting them at risk. I know that the Scottish Government has asked the chief medical officer to investigate, but can the Deputy First Minister assure us that, given the seriousness of those claims and the potential threat to patient safety, the CMO's findings that we have made public are the earliest opportunity? I can give Mr Fraser that assurance that any findings or relevant information will be made public at the earliest possible opportunity, because we believe that it is essential that the public are reassured about the effectiveness of clinical services. Let me make a couple of points on this. Mr Fraser raised the issue that there was allegedly a ban on specialist surgeons entering the nine wells A and E department. Yesterday, on five separate occasions, specialist surgeons attended patients at the nine wells A and E department, as is normal practice on a regular basis. Mr Fraser also raised the issue of patient safety. That is absolutely central to the debate, because it essentially determines the effectiveness of clinical services. At nine wells hospital, nine wells hospital was required, as all hospitals in Scotland are required, to improve their performance on patient safety against the hospital standardised mortality ratio. They were required to increase that by 20 per cent by December 2015. I can say to the chamber that nine wells hospital has achieved not only that level early, but that it has achieved a 22.1 per cent improvement in hospital standardised mortality ratio. What that means is that patient safety within the hospital is improving, it is improving faster than it is improving in other hospitals in the country. I think that notwithstanding what the chief medical officer looks at on behalf of the health secretary, members of the public, and believe you me, that issue matters to me as an elected representative of the people of Persia who regularly use nine wells hospital. My family has used nine wells hospital and has an excellent clinical care for nine wells hospital. I think that we have to consider those issues and be reassured by the effectiveness of the hospital in improving patient safety. The Deputy First Minister will be aware that the Arches venue in Glasgow city centre in my constituency has gone into administration with a potential loss of 130 jobs. Aside from the fact that the Arches is one of Glasgow's most cultural venues, this is obviously a very worrying time for the staff facing redundancy. Can the Deputy First Minister assure those affected that the Scottish Government will offer all the support that it can? I very much understand the significance of the point that Sandra White raised on behalf of the Arches in her constituency. Creative Scotland is working hard with the organisation and with other partners to explore options regarding the future of arts programming of this nature in Glasgow. Creative Scotland agreed with Glasgow Life and Glasgow City Council to bring forward some of this year's support for the Arches, £92,000 from Creative Scotland and £37,000 from Glasgow City Council to assist with the delivery of the current arts programme in the short term. I reassure Sandra White that we will look in all ways that we possibly can do to assist in safeguarding the future of what I recognise as a significant cultural venue in the city of Glasgow and a venue that contributes a great deal to the culture life of Scotland. Question 3, Willie Rennie. To ask the Deputy First Minister what issues will be discussed at the next meeting of the cabinet. The cabinet will discuss issues of importance to the people of Scotland. In the last few years, John Swinney has repeatedly told us that the time for full financial powers was now and the need was urgent. Can he try to explain what his MP Tommy Shepard meant when he said that full fiscal autonomy would be a disaster and a silly thing to do? What Tommy Shepard was doing was explaining the approach that the Government set out in its manifesto where we made clear that the delivery of full fiscal responsibility would have to take place over time. I do not see why that should be a particular revelation to Parliament because on the Kalman powers, the Kalman powers were published in 2010 in a command paper and only in the spring of next year will we see the devolution of income tax powers. That is the point that Mr Shepard was making. The Government has set out on repeated occasions the importance that we attach to acquiring the economic powers in Scotland that will enable us to strengthen the performance of our country, create new opportunities and open up possibilities for the people of our country. Willie Rennie. So they are no longer urgent. On full fiscal autonomy, the SNP, to be frank, has been all over the place. It was in the manifesto, then out, then back in again. Now its MPs say, let somebody else decide. It started as the okey-cokey and it's ended as pass the parcel. It's no wonder that, considering the £7.6 billion price tag, shouldn't the Deputy First Minister just admit that his full fiscal autonomy plans are a disaster and would be a silly thing to do? The one thing that you could say about the Scottish Liberal parliamentary group in the House of Commons is that they couldn't play pass the parcel, because there's not enough of it, and there's barely enough over there to play. They're not even all here today to play pass the parcel. Mr Rennie asked about the Government's and the Scottish National Party's commitment to full fiscal autonomy. The First Minister made clear during the election that we would bring forward amendments to enact this during the Scotland Bill. I made it clear on the 31 May on the Politics Scotland programme. I heard with my own ears that Angus Robertson would make it clear in the House of Commons on Monday. The question is, do the Liberal Democrats have any interest whatsoever in equipping this Parliament with the powers to strengthen Scotland's economic performance and deliver new economic opportunities to the people of Scotland, or are they prepared, just like they were prepared to do for the past five years, to resign themselves to decisions taken by Tory ministers that axed our budget and reduced public spending in Scotland? I want that control to rest here so that we can decide the future of our country. To ask the First Minister what the impact of the Chancellor's in-year budget revisions will be on Scotland. The Scottish Government's budget will be reduced by £107 million as a result of the announcement made by the Chancellor last Thursday. The Government believes that this to be utterly unacceptable. Not only has this Parliament already set its budget, but this country voted in the clearest possible terms against further austerity. Despite that, just a week or two after David Cameron promised to govern with respect, the UK Government is reducing budgets yet again. I met the Chancellor on Monday to put forward an alternative, which encouraged him to use the flexibility at his disposal, and I hope that every party in this chamber will join us in calling on him to do exactly that. I thank the Deputy First Minister for his answer. I know that the First Minister wrote to party leaders to ask them to join with the Scottish Government in condemning the approach from the Chancellor. I wonder if the Deputy First Minister could advise us whether there has been any response from party leaders. Also, in light of the upcoming July budget from the Chancellor, whether he expects perhaps a different approach from the Chancellor to be taken in relation to consulting with this Parliament and the Scottish Government before making such decisions at the dispatch box. To the best of my knowledge, we have not received any replies to the First Minister's letters that were issued on Friday. The second point that Mark McDonald raised is in relation to the forthcoming United Kingdom budget in July. The Scottish Government set out to the Chancellor on Monday an approach that he could take, which is within the fiscal mandate that the Chancellor has legislated for in the last Parliament that would enable him, over the course of the next five years, to invest about £93 billion more in public expenditure and public services than is the subject of the current plans of the UK Government. We will advance that argument and discuss it with the Chancellor on any opportunity that we have, and we had that opportunity on Monday to take that forward. However, the Government believes that the correct approach at this stage in economic recovery is to invest in public services and public spending. We argued for an increase of 0.5 per cent in real terms in public spending over the course of this parliamentary term, and we encourage the Chancellor to consider that issue. I advise the cabinet secretary and the Deputy First Minister that we have not yet received the letter, but we will indeed respond to it when we do. We share the Scottish Government's concerns about in-year budget revisions. The Deputy First Minister, of course, has a number of options to consider. He has already said that he might raise taxes. Could he tell us by what level? Is he also considering using the new borrowing powers that devolved to Scotland in April this year? I would have thought that my opposite number in the Labour Party would have known that I have already committed to using the borrowing powers that we acquired in April to their full extent for this current financial year. That is a piece of elementary information that reading of the budget document would have satisfied, so I am a bit surprised that Jackie Baillie has raised that with me, to the tune of £304 million. On the second point about taxation, as Jackie Baillie knows, in the spring of next year, we will acquire the Calman income tax powers, the Scottish rate of income tax. However, what the Obligers to do is if we wish to change one tax rate, we have to change each of the three tax rates in unison. If we, for example, wanted to increase the top rate of income tax, we would have to increase the basic rate of income tax and the higher rate of income tax into the bargain. That was what the Calman process delivered. Of course, the Calman proposal has not even been implemented before it has been unpicked because of its unsatisfactory nature. Of course, I will consider all the taxation decisions that I have to make. I will make them in good time in the budget process and, in the normal fashion, I will advise Parliament accordingly. To ask the First Minister what action the Scottish Government will take following reports that more than 14,000 people facing bills for personal and social care are in arrears. Local authorities set charges for social care, and they have a duty to ensure that the charges that they make are fair and affordable. Where people are in genuine hardship, local authorities are able to take into account individual circumstances and waive or reduce charges. The Government is supporting the implementation of integration of health and social care around the country with investment of more than £500 million over three years. We have also increased the local government finance settlement to over £10.85 billion in 2015-16. We have already ensured that those in the last six months of a terminal illness do not pay for the care that they receive at home, and we are currently working with COSLA to improve the fairness and the consistency of the system for charging for social care. I hope that the First Minister shares my concern that thousands of Scotland's disabled and elderly community are falling to debt because of social care charging. He mentioned the talks that are on-going with COSLA to try and tackle Scotland's care tax. Those talks have been going on not for weeks or months but for years and with no avail, and I believe that last year the disabled organisations walked out of those talks in frustration. Can I ask the Deputy First Minister whether he will take a new tack? My colleague Siobhan McMahon is about to launch a consultation on a member's bill to abolish the care tax in Scotland. Will the Deputy First Minister reach out across the chamber to other parties and work with us to abolish his tax on Scotland's disabled community? I certainly can say to Mr McIntosh that the Government will engage carefully with the proposals that Siobhan McMahon brings forward. Ministers would be happy to have that discussion with Mr McMahon on how those issues can be taken forward. Of course, there are a whole range of different complexities around the care charging regime, which varies from area to area with different positions taken by different local authorities. There are certain standards that the Government requires to be taken forward, and we have enacted some changes in that respect, which I set out in my earlier answer to Mr McIntosh. However, the Government will continue to take forward the discussions with the relevant interested organisations to ensure that the concerns that have been legitimately raised are properly addressed. Minister, whether the Scottish Government met its 2011 pledge that there would be no compulsory redundancies in colleges throughout the college merger process. In 2011, the then Cabinet Secretary for Education and Life Law learning, Michael Russell, made clear our wish that colleges avoid compulsory redundancies. Ministers have since done all in their power to encourage colleges to follow that lead, particularly at the outset of the college reform programme, when the Minister for Skills and Life Law learning wrote to all college principals encouraging them to adopt a policy of no compulsory redundancies for staff. The then Cabinet Secretary for Education in guidance to the Scottish funding council repeated the expectation that colleges avoid compulsory redundancies. I thank the Deputy First Minister for that answer, but the fact of the matter is that the Scottish National Party should never have made a firm pledge over which it had no legislative control and for which it has obviously conveniently shifted the blame of compulsory redundancies on to college principals. However, the Scottish National Party does have that legislative control over the spending on college places. Why has it allowed college places to fall by a third since 2008, with clearly more cuts to come, as was evidenced by Fife College this week? First Minister, we have been around this territory before about college places. The number of places to which the Government committed to maintain was at 116,000 places, full-time equivalent. What we know from the data is that that figure has not only been maintained, but we have delivered 119,000 full-time equivalent college places in the college sector. I would like to take this opportunity to thank those in the college sector who have dealt with a process of reform that has been challenging—I accept that it has been challenging—but it has delivered greater full-time equivalent places for the college students of our country, which has given those individuals a greater ability to enter the labour market because their skills have been at a more sophisticated and effective level. That is what our economy needs. We need to have people who have deep skills who can contribute to our economy, and the college reforms have delivered exactly that. Members who leave the chamber should do so quickly and quietly.