So people, the farm for me, the grind for me is finally over. Solstice of Heroes Gear, Majestic Masterwork and all characters finally acquired. Today I'm going to bring you guys the tips and tricks and cheeses I use to get all of this and to be honest I didn't really rush so hopefully guys you've still got a few bits and bobs left to do and my help I will give you in this video will help you out which will be pretty cool. How's it going guys my name's DPjen and I'd like to thank you for stopping by and checking out the video if you do enjoy it leaving a like really helps out and if you're new around to enjoy daily Destiny 2 videos be sure to subscribe.  So yes people Solstice of Heroes Gear and all characters and my main we're going to start with is the Hunter look how sexy he looks when it loads up because black screens console loading times as you well know are shocking but as you can see looking absolutely beautiful. Now the shader I'm using here and how many people are going to be asking is new monkey succession and it's just incredible I mean there's plenty of amazing shaders but just like the red paired with the fire glow paired with the subclass which makes it obviously glow even brighter so if I was to do that you can see it doors down if you didn't know that basically I think everybody knows that to be honest. But yes I'm quite happy with this gear I mean the actual whole Solstice event to me some of the challenges and some of the characters were a little bit overwhelming through the everyday dude who works or studies I mean getting all of this done and every character is going to be a crazy grind. Now today I'm going to bring you guys all the tips and tricks and cheeses I use on every character so if you've got anything left to do hopefully it will help you out we're going to start with my Hunter. Now the Hunter drained armor set the green armor set the one you first get I mean it's relatively easy to do but I'm still going to give you guys a few tips you can see you do quite much on screen now. For the helmet complete a run through the European area zone land precision finer blows you have to do 50 of these and defeat 50 fallen combatants I mean this is relatively straightforward I mean I don't really use any cheeses here. Necess is a perfect spot to get fallen also landing the 50 headshots at the same time or if you are lucky enough to load up the European area zone and get the fallen version you should get all of this done in at least a couple of runs of that. The arms complete playlist strikes after do 10 of these collect solar orbs in Gambit or Crucible 100 of them and unlock 10 Solstice packages. The chest loot chests in the European area zone collect elemental orbs of any type in any activity 500 and defeat enemies in the European area zone while equipped with a solar subclass. Now while you are defeating enemies in the European area zone with a solar equipped subclass and defeating 75 of these you should get that amount of orbs and I'd probably say it would take two runs of doing the European area zone to probably get those chests too. I mean you could get 10 chests in a single run but being realistic I'd say two either way and within that you should get at least 100 150 orbs for that. But another great place of collecting orbs is on Mars and load up an escalation protocol. Kill as many as the floor as possible from their spawn then basically load into the same area or the different landing zone on Mars and load up the escalation protocol again. Rinse and repeat till you get your 500 orbs. But the requirements and the other remaining pieces of gear like with the legs complete public events unless there's 10. Complete sources of heroes, bounties, 5 and defeat opposing guardians in the Crucible or Gambit. You should realistically get these 500 orbs by doing them.  Collect arc orbs in any strike 100 and complete Crucible or Gambit matches 10. So yes basically I mean there's a few cheeses you can use here but realistically if you wear everything at the same time doing strikes, playing Crucible, looting chests in the European area zone realistically you should have already got that 500 orbs from doing them. So let's move on to the hunter renewed set. The helmet complete bounties and you have to do 50 of these. These you can just obviously stack from anywhere on the game every planet offers 3. Then you've got Gambit, Hawthorne, Savala, Lord Shaxx, the Gunsmith, Aida One, Werner, the Forsage of Calus. All of these count. Now if you are out of bounties and you've done all of them or some of them are just too long for you to do Eververse also sells bounties too which costs notes. Now if you've got plenty of these notes spare the first 2 or 3 you can keep doing so you can just rinse and repeat these 2 or 3 bounties and they're actually relatively straightforward to do. So for the 50 bounties which is probably the longest part and it's renewed army requirement, that's what I'd say you do. Now you have to loot 50 chests in the European area zone and defeat enemies with Ark weapons. Now the risk runner is your best friend here but you could use any Ark weapon. There's been a lot of misfits here and there, the Warcliffe Coil too but there are plenty of Ark weapons for you to get through this with. The 50 chests in the European area zone though you can't get away from you literally have to do that. Arms complete heroic public events, collect Ark orbs in any strike and defeat Cabal combatants while matching the day's event element. Now the heroic public events I did are Nessus. If you do it right you can rotate between artifacts. Edge, the exodus, black and assistant area. By the time you've done one another one will spawn in so just go to Nessus and do it that way you can get this done in easily 25, 35 minutes so hopefully that helps. Collect Ark orbs in any strike 500. A game people, the risk runner is your best friend here and defeat Cabal combatants while matching the day's event element. Now this for me, the Forge on the EDZ is just so simple, it's unbelievable. So go to the Forge on the EDZ, so many Cabal spawn and you can get this done in a couple of runs. The chests complete gambit matches. Collect Elementor orbs and defeat enemy combatants with Void grenades. Now the collect Elementor orbs, 1500 and the 500 orbs are required for the arms from a strike. I did this in a Fireteam F3, I loaded up the Playlist strikes and was searching for the Dreaming City Strike that corrupted. Upon loading this up in my Team F3 we just made our way to the Blind Well and we got this done in about three or four runs of the tier 3.  So keep that in mind. Defeating enemy combatants with Void grenades. I did this at Shiro Tree from the Dreaming City's Last Wish raid, the checkpoint which you can actually type in a wish to get to. It's pretty simple to do and I've made a video guide and that also. Now I will link any video guide I've made within the video description so if I mention anything I've already made you'll find it linked within the video description. So do check them out. There's probably something there that's going to help you out people. But yeah, the 200 Void grenades needed. I did that at Shiro Tree using that top tree Teva. As soon as the door opens, Teva their enemies and just grenade. And this works wonders people. You'll get this done in about three or four runs easily. Now the legs complete daily or weekly challenges. These can be any challenges people from Crucible Gambit, Ikora, the Vanguard Strikes, the Daily Missions, PvP, whatever. So that isn't too hard to do. Defeat enemies in Strike Playlist while matching the day's event element. 300 of these. Again people you can do this while searching for the corrupted strike on a dream in city through the Vanguard Playlist and you'll get this done relatively quick. And as a team, defeat opposing guardians in the Crucible or Gambit using Void weapons. Well you know what you gotta do here people. Any Void weapon you've got, go into PvP and just slay. The class item, complete patrols in the EDZ, 25. Collect elemental orbs of any type in the European area zone, 300. And defeat mini buses in the European area zone. Now the collecting elemental orbs of any type in the European area zone I'm pretty certain you'll get this done while you loot in the 50 chests from the European area zone, which is the requirement on the helmet. So that you shouldn't really have an issue with. Defeating mini buses though, they use a cheese for this. You wanna get the Kabal event on the EAZ. The one by three buses spawn at the end.  This again people I've made a video on which you'll find linked within the video description. And you can get this done. It's about three enemies every two minutes. So you should get this done relatively quickly using that cheese. So what we'll do now is people will remove onto the Titan and the tips and tricks I used here. Now a lot of the requirements are the same. It's what I've covered on my hunters. So I won't bother mentioning them. Let's get into it. I've completed this. I just haven't applied the masterwork yet, as you can see. But I'll do that another day. But the shader I'm using here is called Satua Tribe which is of course I've claimed the shader people. I've claimed the shader. I do apply it to a lot of my weapons. I've probably got none of them here. I don't want me to prove it to you guys. But yeah, I do. I've claimed the shader. But let's start with the Titan's drained armor requirements. Now the helmet complete a run on the EAZ. Land position final blows. 50 and feet high of combatants 50. I mean Titan's a great place to do this. Or Mars and the escalation protocol for that matter. Arms, loot chests in the European Aerial Zone. Complete sources of hero bounties and defeat enemies in the European Aerial Zone while equipped with an arc subclass. And gain people relatively straightforward. Chest complete adventures. Collect solar orbs in strikes and defeat opposing gardens in the crucible or gambit. Legs, complete public events are necessary. Collect void orbs in the crucible or gambit and unlock sources packages. These are basically the same requirements as the Hunter just on different planets. So use the same tips. Class item, complete playlists, strikes, collect elemental orbs of any type in any activity and complete crucible or gambit matches. Let's move on to the renewed armor set for the Titan. Complete gambit matches. Collect elemental orbs using a matching arc solar killer or void kill subclass and as a team defeat opposing gardens in the crucible or gambit using arc weapons. Complete heroic public events. Complete daily or weekly challenges and defeat minibuses in the European Aerial Zone. Exactly the same requirements for the Hunter. Just use the same tips. Defeat enemies in strike playlists using a subclass that matches the arc solar or void day. Loot chests in the European Aerial Zone and defeat fallen using a subclass that matches the elemental day. Complete bounties. Collect void orbs in any strike and defeat enemy combatants using solar melee attacks. Now there is a cheese for the solar melee attacks and you can do this with the help of a sword.  Just to be sure though, make sure you aren't in your solar subclass otherwise it won't work. This I've made a video on which you'll find the link in the video description. Okay so complete patrols on the I.O. Collect elemental orbs of any type in the European Aerial Zone and defeat enemy combatants with solar weapons. The Sunshot people is your best friend for any requirement of getting kills with solar weapons. This thing is nasty, it's underrated and I don't see many people using it and I don't understand why.  So yeah the cheese is here which you can use are the ones I've already stated on my Hunter and all will be linked within the video description people. Okay so now we'll move on to my Warlock who again people is looking absolutely epic. Now I don't know why that is not completed. I mean I've done it on my Hunter, I've done it on my Titan. I thought it automatically did it on my Warlock obviously. Now will I get that done later either way. So let's look at the requirements for the Warlock-drained armor set. Now if you guys want to know the shader, the shader I'm using right here is the cognition of the nine. Beautiful white and blue still revealing the gold which looks amazing. So yeah let's move on to the Warlock-drained armor requirements. For the helmet complete run through the European Aerozone, land position 500 blows 50 and defeat Cabal combatants. Arms complete, playlists strikes, collect elemental orbs of any type in any activity and defeat opposing guardians in a crucible or gambit. Chest complete adventures, collect arc orbs in a crucible or gambit and unlock sources packages. Legs loot chest in the European Aerozone, collect solar orbs in strikes and defeat enemies in the European Aerozone while equipped with a void subclass item. Complete public events are necessary, complete sources of heroes, bounties and complete crucible or gambit matches. Again people a lot of the same requirements I've already covered on my Titan and Hunter. So let's move on to the renewed set. Defeat enemies in strike playlists using a subclass that matches the elemental day. Collect elemental orbs of any type in the European Aerozone and defeat minibuses in the European Aerozone. Again people, a lot of these tips and tricks I've covered on other characters. Complete bounties, collect elemental orbs using a matching arc, solar or void subclass and as a team defeat opposing guardians in a crucible or gambit using solar weapons. Complete gambit matches, complete daily or weekly challenges and defeat enemy combatants with void weapons. Complete heroic public events, collect solar orbs in any strike and defeat hive combatants using a subclass that matches the elemental day. Complete patrols on Titan, loot chests in the European Aerozone and land arc superfinal blows. Now the arc superfinal blows I did this at the same checkpoint she or she in the last wish raid upon a dream in city as I did my void grenade kills on my Hunter and I got this done in literally five minutes. So yeah it's pretty simple to do that there people. But yeah that is it guys for the renewed and drained armor sets for all characters. So let's move on to the majestic legendary set for all three characters as the actual challenges are the same across all characters. And this is to master work that actual gear. So for the Titan, Warlock and Hunter complete a prestige nightfall with a score of 200,000 or better. Now it's important to mention if you have all your legendary gear applied across all three of your characters if you're doing this, doing these on one character should complete them across the board on every character. So you should only really need to run these challenges once and get them completed on every character. That's why I was confused about my Warlock not getting the gauntlets done when I only did it on my Hunter but yet my Titans are completed automatically. So it's really weird that it's but ho ho that's the way it goes I'll have to get that done later. So yes complete a prestige nightfall with a score of 200,000 or better. I did this people on the hallowed layer strike and I'll show you guys the challenge card just to make it easier for you guys. I did this in a team obviously I had two hunters running Tether and we also had a Titan running Hammers and it was relatively quite easy people. We have a power hand kept of 176 which is still pretty easy people. Modifiers are used for solar singe, you don't want to be going into this using arc because the end part is just nuts. We have match game, extinguish and black out. Now it should be quite easy for you guys I mean the last room I mean the amount of adds that spawn I mean we did way over 200 I think we did about 240 and I found it there you go people the hallowed layer 242,000 is what we did. So we got through quite easy and we had plenty of points spare guys. So yes that's the one I suggest you try in this week as it is here and you may even land yourself as well people. The amazing shotgun that is I don't know I'll do that right that one then and mine is Ambition, mine is a curade roll which dropped a few weeks ago actually but it's a great great shotgun. Okay so let's move on. Complete play of the strikes with Klamet, you need 5 of these like I said, doing them on one should complete them across the board. Complete the shattered throne in a dream in city with a fire team of 2 players or fewer. Now you can actually cheese these people and I made a video on this what you can do is you can load this up in a team of 3 and at the very last part when you kill the boss the third person just backs out obviously he doesn't get this complete for himself but he will have the 2 remaining people and they will get this completed. Reset your season 7 valor rank in a cruiser but this is retro active by the way so if you've already done this it should auto complete. If not you better get grind in PvP and defeat challenging combatants throughout the system. There's multiple places you can do this, the Mars, the Lost Sector, you can do this in the Menagerade, I mean I got this done and even realised so yes that shouldn't be an issue for you people and yeah guys this is that and that is this complete solstice gear majestic on every single character and the grind was real. Shame it would probably be absolutely pointless armor come shadow keep I mean even though it is 2.0 armor confirmed I mean it's gonna be so many other armor sets we're gonna be chasing I'm not sure many of us will be rocking this then but hey ho still it's time for us to play for right now I'm gonna be going back to being boy actually I'm gonna be grinding PvP I need to play about 20 more rumble games to get my red rixis and I need to do that before shadow keeping a new season but yeah guys that is it for the video hope you enjoyed it I really do again I apologise about my voice I have been coughing and splurring all over this video but I will cut that out for you guys but guys I hope you enjoyed the video if you did leave me a like really helps and if you're new around to enjoy daily testing the videos be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I will just turn notifications on by hitting that bell button but guys thanks as always for stopping by hopefully you enjoyed the video and hopefully I will see you on that next one


Let's go ahead and get started. I had two main questions I wanted to ask. Unfortunately, we didn't get the notes included from our... Oh, no, we did. Yeah, from the call last time, which is discussion of Heat and Tosca regarding cloud native network functions. But before we dive in, can I just check here? So, Leia, I appreciate you joining from Huawei, Sweden. Interesting that we're not getting anyone from China this time. And Leif, is this the first call you participated in? Yes, that's correct. No, that's all. Okay. Welcome. Can you tell me about cinch.com? Yeah, so we provide messaging solutions. We have like a two-sided business model. We are like one of the largest segulators, but we also provide like infrastructure towards operator primarily done in the messaging within SMS, MMS or CS, but software operators. Great. And so I guess I would... But we have a few more folks on now. Could I just ask everyone to please enter your info in this Google doc to sign in for the call? So I would love to just have a short discussion on the concept of conformance for CNFs. So I've been beginning the conversations with LF Networking and CNTT about their plans and with VNFs, they are essentially demonstrating software or conformance against either heat or Tosca templates. But my impression is that the heat part definitely doesn't make sense for CNFs. And even Tosca is a little unclear whether there's a fit there or not. And so I guess I would love to hear from anybody on the call and maybe Robbie would be willing to speak up first on the question of your thoughts on CNFs with Vodafone and how you're looking at going about conformance, demonstrating that they work correctly and then also how they will interwork with other parts of your network. Thank you, Don. Yes, so CNF is conformance specifically. I think Tosca has been chosen in Vodafone as the language for service description. And this is why in LFN, if you look at the OPP program... I'm sorry, Robbie, you said Tosca has? Yes, Tosca. Okay. Yeah, so if we're trying to apply this to the CNFs, it might not make sense. It might make sense. It depends how really this is being defined. So Tosca as a language, it could sit on top of other description language like Helmstratt, for example. It does not have to be pure Tosca to be able to define a service that is composed from CNFs as only Tosca language. So it could be any language underneath, but Tosca will be the umbrella language that will define the overall service end-to-end. And the individual components, it could be other languages. This is one way of doing it. The other way is go natively Tosca. So everything is just defined as Tosca from the GitGo. And that will make it simpler really to perform compliance testing and that will make it more compatible with the way we're working OPP. Now as Vodafone, I don't think we have a strong opinion for now how CNFs should be presented since this is still, we're trying to figure out really the right way to do that. But I think within this forum, it would be good to understand what would be the best architectural decision to take in terms of supporting a conformance testing and which way to go. Okay, great. I appreciate that feedback. Would anybody else be willing to share an opinion? Raymond, I don't know that you've joined a call before. I'd love to have you introduce yourself as well. Hi, yeah, sorry. Sorry, yeah, I haven't joined a call before. So I'm from Expo. We do test and measurement software and hardware for telcos. We actually found out about your telecommunication group at the recent KubeCon. So myself and my chief architect, Alex Devagori, have been trying to get a little bit more active with the Tug. So we're just at the moment in very much observer mode just trying to figure out exactly what's going on and what's happening. But yeah, we're trying to just see how we can fit in and how we can hopefully contribute to building a better community. Great, we're glad to have you. I guess I would ask, have you were at KubeCon in San Diego? Have you looked at the process of containerizing some of your current network functions? Yeah, so I think we're less in terms of actually building network function stuff. I think we're building less network functions as sort of in a post-network function service assurance space. But yes, there is a lot of work going internally to containerize a lot of our stuff. I keep telling the NFV guys that yes, we need to be more container happy but we do have at least one group that is working on containerization of a lot of stuff. So yeah, there is definitely some work going internally as well as the fact that we have fairly recently sort of tried to shift our architectural focus on heading into a cloud native world. Great, yeah, I'm glad to hear that and that is sort of the point of this group. So let me open it up for anyone else then I would love a question. Have any of the rest of you worked on TOSCA in terms of using that with a Helm chart? I personally have not used that but we're looking at reading some papers and articles. It seemed to me very powerful way of doing it because you could mix not just CNFs, you could mix other technologies like PNFs for example within the service definition or even BNFs. That makes it more flexible in that way. Personally, I have not used it directly with CNFs, we use it with BNF and Vodafone but all the evidence shows that it provides some more flexibility in definition of the network. Are you going to be at the CNTT meeting in January in Prague? Yes, I will be there. Can I ask you if anybody else in the call is planning on going? Yeah, I will probably also join in coming from CINCH. Great, I know that they're planning to begin to come up with a plan for CNF conformance but you don't have any more insight into what the plan is that that, what's likely to occur at that meeting, do you? Well, I do actually because myself and Mark prize from Maxis, we're organizing the meeting. So the plan is to, yeah, the plan is in Prague to get together, Jim Baker is sitting up a session that we can sit together and do some brainstorming. We would like to have as many talk people as possible contributing into a discussion. We know we have a lot of the RA2 folks from CNTT will be actively part of that discussion. But yeah, this is the plan, kind of trying to think about it in there and see what would be the general direction of the community feel like. And this is something we could report back to the talk here after the discussion that happens in Prague. Yeah, do you know Manoj Nair from Netcracker? No, I don't. He has a document. I'm not going to share it now but I have encouraged him to post it into the Tug Slack channel talking about current approaches for a CNF modeling. And he's looked at a variety of different scenarios of how you can use Tosca types or a Tosca Kubernetes profile. But I'm just a little unclear whether any of those have a kind of traction right now or are going to be the preferred way forward. Yeah, I have not seen the documentation unfortunately. I will look for it. Yeah, so hopefully that'll occur in this Slack channel in the next couple of days if we could have a set of conversations there around it. He had just given me an advanced copy but I don't want to paste it in without his okay. So I guess I would just check again with this group. Is there anyone else who would be interested in sharing an opinion on that question on CNF modeling and conformance and any alternative opinions? Yeah, I wonder if this group has just want to pay more attention with the entity or because I think we have more discussions than before on the entities progress now, right? Lacey, a little bit more please. Yeah, I mean for this talk meeting I think we are currently talking about more and more stuff around the same DD as work. Like the CNF modeling, maybe the same testing also. Sorry, maybe the deflation of the templates. Something like that. So it's like we're going to more cooperate with those entity activities. Yeah, it's a little bit up in the air to be honest. I mean, we're definitely interested in collaborating with CNTT, I think the key question is that CNTT has been very VNF focused today. And so it's just not clear yet for a model on how that would work with CNFs. So just a comment on actually in CNTT we do have a whole reference architecture focusing into a cloud native. So we do have two tracks, one of them is completely to your point VNFs and the other is a CNF focused. So the only thing we talk about in there is CNF and cloud native. Well, so Robbie, I mean, I might have missed it but when I last looked at the RA2 documents about that second track, there wasn't really any information there yet. Yeah, it started after Antwerp. So now we do have at least the first three chapters drafted and I talk about the model and approach taken to use Kubernetes to run cloud network functions. So I'm not sure what was the last time you looked at it but there's been a lot of work happening. I'm just pasting a link in to, and I think it was Antwerp was the last place that I looked. So I guess, which of the chapters here would you say most of the work has taken place in? So it would be like chapter three, the high level architecture? Yes, so chapter two had just finished the requirements and chapter three and four, where the focus currently is on. Just looking at it from high level and then going into the component level specifics for the search and architecture. If you look at chapter three, there is more information than chapter four at the moment because of nature of it. Chapter one discusses the approach that will be taken to do that and will be useful really to look at what would be the approach in terms of multi-clusters? How do we deal with the lifecycle management of a cluster itself and what the pressure model will look like? Right, so I definitely see more material here. Right now, it looks more descriptive of how the Kubernetes manages environments and such. I'm not seeing yet a discussion, for example, around Helm. Yeah, so for like 4.8, you say the reference architecture must support the usage of Kubernetes application package manager using the Kubernetes APIs, like Helm v3. So I'm glad to see the reference to Helm v3, but I don't quite see the details here about how you... So I'm particularly focused on this conformance question, which I guess does seem like one of the most important outputs of the RA2 work. Absolutely, so if you look at the way CNTT really position itself is looking at the infrastructure layer more than maybe the orchestration layer. Now, having said that, one of the things that will keep coming up is how do we help within CNTT specifying requirements to assist programs like OVP phase 2 or OVP phase 1 to do the compliance certification program. Now, although we in CNTT, we said this is not something we're going to directly cover because it's our view of this orchestration kind of level, but as we start looking at OVP phase 2 with the CNTT tag group, the hope is really to collaboratively come up with a way to move forward. So I'm not expecting CNTT to specify in details what would be the right mode of... Is it Doska or is it Helm or is it a combination of both? We're hoping that collaboratively we can figure something together and that will be driven by the waiver verification program at the Tug and with LFN will come up with it. Okay. I mean, I guess I'd love to get your current thinking on it. Let me just go ahead and share a little bit of my thinking on the subject. So there's a project that CNTF has been investing in called API Snoop. And just to be clear, I'm going to give you a quick overview of this, but I have slides that I'm working on to walk through this process in detail and provide a lot more context for it. But what it does is use the audit logs in Kubernetes to evaluate the process. And look at every Kubernetes API call that it's making. And then it's able to classify all of those and say, okay, there's these stable APIs and these beta APIs and these alpha APIs. And so the user interface I've pasted it into Zoom is admittedly a little confusing for this use case because it's a little confusing for this use case because it's currently being used more for a different use case which is trying to look at the other side of certification, the platform side, and looking at which of the APIs are not being covered by the current tests. But the same software infrastructure could also essentially be used to look at a CNF and say, okay, does the CNF only use publicly accessible APIs and what version of Kubernetes would be needed in order to support the necessary APIs at the stable where the beta level. Yes, actually, I like that. I just looked at the whole page. I think this is certainly one of the things that can be leveraged a lot in the conformance application program. I do feel there is different level of verification needed. One of them is the conformance, compliance to just Tosca or HIT or whatever that format we decide to test against. And that would be just compliance. That means like offline testing. And then there will be the validation testing which is the second category in my view which is looking at the APIs. And one of the things that are important for CNTT is to make sure that all CNFs using the same APIs. So this kind of tooling will help us a lot to really identifying if a given CNF is really using the APIs that we standardize as CNTT moving forward. And the third level would be the performance. And I do imagine things like Testbed project, for example, which is mainly focusing on the performance can also fit into that verification program to deliver that performance metric and measurements that needed to start also defining how the characterization of the CNF will be within the accepted range of CNTT. But yeah, absolutely, yeah. Great. And I would just mention, Robbie, that the API Snoop project is entirely open source. And so as I said, it's not quite set up for what's needed yet, but it's something that I think could be pretty easily adapted to it. It also kind of follows the model of the current Kubernetes certification where, which is a self-certification that any organization can run, but then it can be validated by a third parties to ensure that Kubernetes platforms are actually conformed the way they're supposed to be. And the other side of that is, so we haven't actually done that for the application side. But there's certainly a scenario where you could use API Snoop to do so. Yep. I might call on Watson for a minute. Watson, I appreciate you being willing to wake up so early to do this call. Is there anything that you might add so far into the conversation about API Snoop and Toskey and such? Yeah, as far as API Snoop, I think I would recommend select what you said as far as trying to maybe validate the use of APIs as Kubernetes and it's interesting when we're talking about the different, let's say, I don't know, problems between maybe the vendors and service providers and the whole idea of should be for Kubernetes and all those issues that could come up from that. Trying to make it to where we're all having some kind of like a fair place to where vendors can make and collaborate their CNS and try to avoid some of the issues there. API Snoop seems like it could help to contribute there. And things like that. There's so many problems or ways to describe how the different vendors collaborate. Like if you were to take, say, the Etsy standards and all the different standards that we try to make to ensure that everyone plays nice with each other even though they might have closed source offerings and things like that, it seems it comes back to making sure that APIs are strong and validating each other. So API Snoop, I think, would help with that with Kubernetes. Yeah, I'll just make the point that API Snoop itself is open source, but it definitely works completely against a closed source CNF. There's no need, so it's a runtime application, API checker, so there's no need for the source code, the CNF, to be open source. So I guess the question I might ask for Robby and also Lea and anyone else on the call who has an opinion is how you do see, let's say that we have a CNF and it's installed via a home v3 chart and it's doing something like the broadband network gateway or some kind of routing of traffic or firewall or something like that. I'm curious your view on how that is interacting with the existing MANO platforms that operators are using today. I guess Robby, as you've looked at this work, do you see it occurring as orchestrated by ONAP or what are you seeing as kind of the, I think it would be southbound connections, but I'm not sure that's the right metaphor. Yes, to be fair, I think ONAP is an orchestration platform. If you look at Kubernetes, it has some orchestration capabilities, but I don't think the capabilities that are covered by Kubernetes at the moment is equivalent to the flexibility we have within ONAP. Just to interrupt for a second, I find that the fact that ONAP and Kubernetes both describe themselves as orchestrators, very confusing. Yeah, it is. And this is what part of the confusion of the answer I'm going to give you in a minute, which is it's not clear yet exactly what role Kubernetes will play in the existence of ONAP. And we do feel ONAP is still important in the CNF world and having that way to have a southbound to your point from ONAP to a Kubernetes platform to orchestrate CNFs is really important. Now, how they will end up really implemented in real life, this is still to be seen and explored. I don't think we do have a clear answer, even within CNTD itself to what's the recommended way of doing that. This is something we would like to also highlight and we did highlight as a gap in the industry, trying to figure out really what would be the relationship between Kubernetes and ONAP moving forward. Now, if we look at it from different approach, if we look at Kubernetes as standalone platform to starting with and then think about how do we hook it up into ONAP, what benefit do we get by using hook it up to ONAP. I think this is the way we start to look at it. If we just forget about ONAP for a second and then look at it from pure cloud native concept and then when we start to think about services, I'm sure ONAP will have more important role to play there. It's not clear to me at the moment how would that be felt. Okay, I mean, I was hoping you would say yes, it is clear to me and here's how it's going to work. Yeah, I hope that too. Le, would you like to speak up on that question of ONAP and CNF connections? Actually, I think we have been working on the ONAP for this CNF for a while. Actually, we recommend the way that they are currently moving forward to the containerized working nodes. They try to using this, how to say the CNF, to treat it as the artifact inside the whole existing electrical management so that they can directly adopt the current credit way or how to say the helmet way to provision those CNFs. So I think that's what they are currently doing and actually in our internal implementation, we are actually using not only the helmet but also the TOSCA, the heat, but even actually we even developed our own version of the TOSCA to help our product because we still think they are not good enough to feed for our special requirements. So I think the helmet is good enough for maybe some general purpose application but for the telcon applications are still some requirements there cannot be met. So we still need to investigate on the helmet to see if everything can be done via the helmet. I guess our policy is just become more and more open so we are trying to transit to using the helmet but still I guess need some time to make it more how to say to meet every requirement from the product. That's not an easy thing. So it's still ongoing progress. Yeah. Could I appreciate that feedback? Could I call on Michael Peterson for a second? Michael, would you be willing to tell us what we should be doing here? Yeah, I think it's a tough discussion and decision to make so I'm honestly not really sure at this point what would be the right approach forward. Yeah, that's a recurring theme here on the call today. Yeah, but any views on, I mean, have you worked with Tosca much in the past? No, I briefly looked into it. I think it was a few years ago. Otherwise, I haven't really used it much to be honest. And the work you've been doing in the CNF test bed, you haven't yet been trying to package up in Helm charts, but in fact, you've been more focused on getting the actual installations correct, just doing it manually. We've actually created quite a few Helm charts at this point to try and try and shift away from running everything using a mixture of Ansible and just shell scripts. So a lot of the examples we have now actually based on Helm charts. Great. Okay. But whether it's all working on Helm or not, the goal is to get there.  Of course, of course. Although I guess even there your aim is to have some of that work containerized and running that it would run on the node to set things up first, correct? I think that would definitely be the end goal. Again, having everything in like a modular fashion that also makes it a lot easier to do custom deployments or do modified deployments without having to redo everything. So again, having building blocks to set up what you're planning to use should definitely be one of our end goals. But at this point, we're not really there. We did some updates to I guess just the Kubernetes deployment recently where we've tried splitting that up into hardware provisioning and then the software stack of Kubernetes provisioning on top of that one. But I guess that's it's under to do for 2020. That's for sure. Okay. Hey, Robby, could I ask you one more question before you have to depart? Sure. Yeah. It was the CNF definition question. Where can you point me in where in the CNTT work? I presume you're referencing the Etsy specs in order to define a BNF. But I'm curious if you have worked on a definition of a CNF. Actually, within the CNTT, what we did, we referred to the definition that been defined by the tag group. So that's very nice of you, but I don't know that we have the best definition yet in the in the white paper. Yeah. So I've been in a few calls within the tag group to define that. I don't think we still got to a conclusion. But within CNTT, we thought this is where the right way of defining it, not within CNTT itself within the tag group. So yeah, we did not really define it in CNTT. We were relying on others to define it for us. Okay. Because I think we were still having a debate. And I know we were still having a debate within the tag group on, I think they were at version nine or something on the white paper in definitions. I just posted the link. Actually, if you look at the section on the document. Yes. Well, no, that's the, that's the cloud native definition, which is great. And that one, I think there is uniformity on and people find that useful. But it's specifically for the definition of a CNF. I think was a little less. Yeah, if you scroll down a little bit, I agree. If you scroll down a little bit, it said the CNF is also working on a set of cloud native principle and CNF definition. So this is where we really added the link to there and hopefully once that finalized, we can just copy and paste it here. Yes. Okay. So I do appreciate the site by reference and now, but of course it means that the tug group actually doesn't need to, to come to consensus on that definition. Those were most of the areas that I was looking to cover today. Would, is there anybody else on the call who would like to, to voice and Robbie, I understand you have to go now, but thank you for, for joining the conversation. I would like to share an opinion on any of these issues. I still just wonder why would, why we wanted to understand the, the usage of this helm or the Tosca or something like that. The purpose of this discussion. Well, the, the, what was driving it is that CNTT is going to be moving forward very likely with the OVP, the verification and compliance program. And so I'm trying to understand how that program would work about how you would be able to demonstrate CNF's as being conformant. But I definitely don't think we have a consensus there. As I said, I am going to put together. Some details about API snoop and talking about how that could be used to show the conformance of specific helm charts, but that doesn't speak about how to show interoperability with the man of systems. Right. So actually it's kind of like we are going to use the OVP to to certificate CNF or what? I guess they haven't figured it out, but I think the natural thing that they're looking at is what is the smallest changes they could make to the, the VNF tools that would allow them to certify CNF's as well. Then what about the CNF testbed? So what's the relationship between the same type that were in the OVP? Yeah, so today there's none. I mean, we've certainly talked about using the testbed to run CNF's and demonstrate that they do work. The question is just that it's not set up for that today in any sort of automated way. And so, I mean, one of the advantages of API snoop is that it doesn't need the same level of infrastructure and set up to spin things up and demonstrate it. I guess Michael or Watson, would you, either of you want to make a comment about the CNF testbed and using that for certification? Actually, I guess if we are going to do something like that, we'd better just set up, you know, like some relationship or mappings too, that they can describe those relationships because it's a little bit confusing, you know, there's so many programs there. Oh, I totally agree. And I mean, I think it's, it's problematic. So we definitely need to have clarity here for vendors, particularly for vendors who are just getting started in the space and trying to come up to speed, that we would like to have a simple story for them about what the process is to get certified. And as far as the CNF testbed, yes, it's a bit too set up still for the vendors and service providers. Also, another thing that we're working on is how the output is viewed. So something a bit nicer for people to consume on what's valid and what has been validated or what conforms and what doesn't. So, yeah, I mean, let me just make a quick statement on that, which is that one of the huge strengths of the current Kubernetes conformance program is that it is a self testing framework. It doesn't require very many resources to run. So essentially any Kubernetes vendor out there who's created their own implementation can just run Sonabui or there's other ways, other test harnesses, but a relatively simple container and run through this whole test and within half an hour or so get a detailed log showing where they pass or fail on everything. And where the testbed, Michael Watson, how many servers is it right now? It's like four. And it takes quite a while to spin up and have everything get configured just on the Kubernetes side. I think the Kubernetes side right now we use two servers, one for running as a master, a small server for the master and then we have a bigger server running as the worker node. Okay, but my only point is they're quite substantial. It can be. It can be. I think at this point it's manageable, but there are definitely plans to scale it up and have some bigger clusters and some cross server communication going on in the cluster as well. Okay. So I guess I would be curious on your thoughts then on a conformance program. I mean, it seems like there's at least three things that we're discussing here where something like a Tosca template could be essentially entirely a static analysis ahead of time to just look at that template is conformant and parses correctly. And then you have the runtime analysis that you could do with API snoop of looking at what API calls are actually being made. And then you do have the test bed that you could look at some performance analysis and look at the ability to actually move meaningful amounts of traffic. Yeah, and I think I think all three approaches should be considered and it's something that I think we should aim for. At this point we have some performance testing in place and that's still being worked on. And I think we're not really at the point yet where it makes much sense to try and take in the conformance testing on both the templates and the runtime, but it's something that should be considered when we get to the point where we start having developers actually deploying and testing on the CNF test bed. And then we should definitely figure something at least a bare minimum in place to begin with. And then of course it's something that can be scaled up afterwards. Yeah. So, Watson, could I give you the last word here? Anything that you would add? Yeah, again, as far as the test bed, I think it's important for obviously for us to get it working easier for people to install. One of the things obviously is it's a little bit different than maybe the other conformance tests because you need smart mix. There's hardware involved, that kind of thing, and maybe in the future even A6 and stuff like that. So that's where it kind of comes a little bit more difficult. And again, we need to make it a bit easier to consume the results that people are a bit confused about that part. So. Yeah, I definitely agree. Okay, would anyone else like to comment or any other feedback on the meeting? I definitely am the one taking an action here on trying to document a few of these questions in more detail. Okay, last chance, and then I'm going to end the call. Really do appreciate everybody joining today at this awkward time, particularly you Watson, I think it's 545 a.m. where you are. Yeah. So we will look at whether we want to move this an hour back for January. But appreciate the call and happy holidays. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.


Everybody what's going on, I am Greg Sussman joined today by Jim Sonison Fandle as we go over the top stacks in week 14 in Daily Fantasy. What's going on Jim? I'm befuddled Greg, like how do I pick three stacks on a 13 game slate? This is tough, I feel restricted and I feel like it's your fault, so I'm a little bitter today. I'm kind of with you here Jim, I'm looking at this list and I'm a bit perplexed myself where I see the Seahawks are playing the Jets and there's no Russell Wilson or DK Metcalf to be found anywhere on this list. What is happening? They're running too much, it's very obvious. Also like the Jets aren't going to keep pace with no Denzel Min, so it's tough for me to get jazzed about the Seahawks, they're probably going to hit value, like they'll be good plays but are they going to be great plays? Probably not. So I think that I'd rather go with these guys who I think should be in more competitive games that can give us the true juice that we need. You talk about the best human football, right, the Kansas City Chiefs and you may not think any game they play is going to be close, but you're facing probably the coach of the year in Bryan Flores, it's a whole lot different, Patrick Mahomes and Tyree Hills, the first stack here that you want to go into and Bryan Flores has done a fantastic job with these Miami Dolphins, defense as a whole and they've kept things close which may be why you like the Chiefs in this spot. Yeah, the Chiefs are weird because usually we run away from bad matchups and this is a bad matchup, this Dolphins defense is legit. Like you said, Bryan Flores doing an awesome job. So we don't want to target bad matchups with 31 out of 32 teams, but with the Chiefs that might actually be beneficial because it keeps the game closer for longer and allows them to keep that foot on the gas for all four quarters. Not like they, you know, tend to keep take it off regardless. They love to throw the football, but I think this is a good spot. We've actually seen Patrick Mahomes light up really good defenses so far this year. He dropped a 40 burger on the Ravens. Ravens have a better defense than the Dolphins. So I think that bodes pretty well. Also put a 31 against the Bucks. The Bucks, you know, maybe not as quite as good as the Dolphins, but having those two data points to me says that Patrick Mahomes against a very good Dolphins defense can still put up a good point total. He is lower, lower sour than Aaron Rodgers likely to be a little bit less popular too. So I think that this is actually a pretty good pivot off of that packer stack against a very beatable Detroit Lions team. So that's why I want to go with the Chiefs here. I think the Dolphins can keep things competitive. And there's also very logical ways to go with this game. You get Patrick Mahomes, you get Miles Gaskin on the bringback or Mike Gisicki, and then you stack Mahomes with Tyree Kill. He has double digit targets in four straight games in five of the past six as well. He actually has six deep targets in two of those six games, which is just disgusting because we know how efficient those deep targets are too from Patrick Mahomes. So yes, the matchup is tough. The Dolphins are very good, but I kind of think that's an advantage here for the Chiefs. It should be a very close game. I think the Dolphins could cover the spread. And if they do, we're going to see a lot of Mahomes and a lot of Hill. And I'll take that every time no matter whom they are facing. So I think that the Chiefs are a good spot to go this week. I like them a tiny bit more for tournaments than the Packers. But looking for a meeting outcome, go with the Packers. If you want that true, true, true ceiling, I think the Chiefs have the slight edge. It's a tough matchup for them, but Holmes with Tyree Kill and that deep ball, it's unbeatable, you'd think. Russell Wilson, DK Metcalf, I mentioned earlier, also have that similar connection against the Dolphins. It's a weird spot, but the Chiefs have the ability to just put a point on anybody as you mentioned here, Jim. And that combination with Mahomes with Tyree Kill is just lethal on any Sunday. And this Sunday, we expect more of the same. Up next, coming off the Rare Week 13 by it's top of Brady and the Buccaneers. Brady is paired in your stack with Chris Godwin. Mike Evans battling something here this week. You worry about his availability on Sunday, if that's the case, Chris Godwin and Antonio Brown are both going to step up against a beatable Viking secondary. It's not the Mike Zimmer secondary of old. There's no roads closed in Minnesota, which means Tampa Bay will have an opportunity to really let the offense explode, we hope, here on Sunday, especially coming after some rest. Yeah, a lot of times I will get concerned when an offense doesn't have a good player. Mike Evans was finally healthy. He was playing really good football. So if you were to take Mike Evans out of most offense, I'd be pretty concerned about it. But I think we've seen Tom Brady do well with depleted resources earlier this year. He had a game back in the first couple of weeks where there was no Chris Godwin. It was before Antonio Brown signed before Rob Gronkowski really came to life. And it was basically just Mike Evans.  And I think that that ceiling is still there for Tom Brady, even if there is no Mike Evans, especially now with Chris Godwin, hopefully healthy with that finger issue, but then also Antonio Brown being in town in Gronk, playing really good football. I think this is a pretty good situation for Tom Brady, even if there is no Mike Evans. The reason I want to go Chris Godwin over Gronkowski, over Brown is that the relationship here is a bit more long lived outside of Gronk, obviously. I know that Antonio Brown had that really good game with Tom Brady back in New England, but Godwin and Brady even working together since training camp. We just haven't seen a lot of that because Godwin has had a couple of different injuries. We've had some weird games to this team. So I think the chemistry should be there for Tom Brady and Chris Godwin. I also think the Vikings are gonna keep pace here, similar to what we talked with the Dolphins. That's a good thing for Tom Brady, for Chris Godwin, for Antonio Brown and Rob Gronkowski too. This Vikings passing offense actually ranks eighth in schedule adjusted passing offense once bought ahead of the Buccaneers. So I think this is a great game to stack on both sides. And I think that it's a pretty logical way to stack it here if there is no Mike Evans. You get Tom Brady paired with one of those three pass catchers remaining. You run it back with Adam Thielen, Justin Jefferson or Dalvin Cook, despite a tough matchup. So I want to stack games where I know where the ball is going. We might have a better idea of that if Mike Evans sits. So yeah, usually I'm in a downgrade teams when they're missing a really good wide receiver. And that is what Mike Evans is right now. But I think because they're viable alternatives because they've seen Brady do well without pieces in the past. And because the scheme should be competitive, I am okay still going Tom Brady here. I think he just has the upside that we need on a slate with so many good quarterbacks available. Yeah, you pointed it out. I think that was the important spot, Jim, that with so many wide receivers out earlier this year, Tom Brady still went off for over 30 fantasy points. And all he had really was Mike Evans in that matchup. Now you have Antonio Brown there. You have Chris Godwin there. So the possibilities are about for Tom Brady to be able to give you the points. And Chris Godwin being his favorite target, you'd expect this Sunday if Mike Evans isn't active, it puts a lot of entry here in the stack. If Minnesota can keep pace, and I agree, I think they will. Then Tampa Bay is going to be a popular stack target. And I think it makes sense on Sunday. Speaking of wide receivers out or banged up, that brings us to E.J. Brown of the Tennessee Titans. That explosion ability reminds many of Julio Jones of just how he could just burst through and it's that big number 11. But big number 11 may not be out there. And you know what the other former first round pick on this Titans team in Corey Davis to potentially step up? We saw it last week and Ryan Tannehill has his connection. Now I do feel like whenever we talk about Corey Davis, he blows it.  Why is this weekend going to be different against Jacksonville? Well, unfortunately, because my boy Marcus Mariota is no longer his quarterback. Back in the day where we had Corey Davis flop a lot, it was a different situation for sure because this year Corey Davis has been really rock solid. It's not just what he did against the Browns in week 13. In the games he's played with E.J. Brown, he has 25% of the overall targets and 44% of the deep targets. That is massive, massive volume that can lead to big days like he had. So I don't think that was a blip. I think that he's been pretty legit. Now I will say if E.J. Brown can't go, I would downgrade this offense. We're talking about that with Mike Evans before. He is that alpha who you want out there and it would downgrade the entire offense. So if E.J. Brown can't go, I would downgrade Corey Davis, downgrade Ryan Tannehill, downgrade Derek Henry. But I think that if we assume E.J. Brown's good to go, he played through that injury last week, I would feel pretty good about this passing offense because Derek Henry is shaping up to be the most popular running back on the slate. That's justified. I think that Derek Henry should be the most popular running back on the slate because he is a very good play this week. But in those situations, you can just pivot to the same team and use the passing offense here because we know the Jaguars can't stop the rush but also cannot stop the pass. They're actually worse against the pass than they are against the rush. I think that Mike Glennon can keep this game kind of close. He's slinging a deep, letting it fly, kind of seeing what happens. And I love that person. I think it's great. So you can feel good about this game being at least somewhat competitive. Maybe the Jaguars hanging around until the fourth quarter allowing the Titans to throw the football a little bit. That means that Tannehill has upside. He's had 29 or more Fando points, three separate times this year. He's got a great top 26 in one other. He tends to go off in the same games that Derek Henry goes off. So you could actually pair Tannehill with Derek Henry as well. Very much on board with that. That was one of our stacks for last week, which obviously the Henry part did not work out. But I think it could work out for this week. So I think that it's a good week to go back to the Titans passing game. You can run it back with either James Robinson or DJ Shark on the other side. Shark is $5,900 on Fando. That is a delicious salary. Given the downfield work that he gets, he had five deep targets from Glennon last week. So I think this is another game where we kind of know where the ball is going. We know how to stack it up. And there's a lot of upside on both sides. So I do think that Henry deserves to be the most popular running back on the slate. But that also gives us a chance to pivot here, go with this Titans passing offense, who also, as we saw last week, does have a lot of juice as well. Derek Henry may be that most popular running back. AJ Brown may miss the game, but Corey Davis is going to have to step up on Ryan Tannehill as the quarterback. We hope that's exactly what happens unlike the Marriota years. You mentioned DJ Shark. We talked about him yesterday with Tom Becchio right here on the hurry-up. And he was a player that we were super high on last week and those targets were there. The receptions were not. Underwhelming game, ultimately from him. Hopefully, if you're using Shark at this decreed salary that you get what you're looking for from Mike Glennon, who's just going to sling it like you mentioned. Ryan Tannehill is also going to sling it. Hopefully, it's the Corey Davis. Hopefully, AJ Brown plays. And hopefully, this Titans team is flying around the field on Sunday. That's the new for us here on the Fandola hurry-up. Jim, I am ready for week 14. Let's do it, man. Yeah, I wish we could have gone through like six more stacks, but hey, you know, I can settle, Greg, and we can make up for it next week by talking more stacks and more stock up on Monday. I cannot wait. The great news about Sunday is that the 4 p.m. window has like six games. So we are going to be locked and loaded and we leave two witching hours for Scott Hansen. So, yay. For Jim Saunders, I am Greg Salsman. Thank you so much for watching the Fandola hurry-up. Good luck in week 14. And we'll see you back here on Monday for another edition of the Fandola hurry-up.


Humans have a very neat way of determining sex, but you're already aware of that.  All the females have two copies of the X chromosome and all the males have an X and a Y chromosome. Now the females, aka the moms, can only give out an X chromosome to her kids. So all of her gametes will have just this X chromosome, making all of them identical to each other. That's why moms are called homo-gameric, meaning that she always has the same gametes. Meanwhile on the other hand, dads have an X and a Y chromosome. So half of his gametes will have the X chromosome and the remaining half will have the Y chromosome. Because of the fact that he has two different gametes with him, we call him heterogamedic. Now because of this heterogamedic factor, dads can either give out an X or a Y chromosome to his kids. If he gives out an X, he will have a baby girl. If he gives out a Y, he will have a baby boy. Now let's flip this entire system. If we flip it completely, we will have an opposite version of this XY system. So instead of having females with two copies of the X chromosome, we're now going to have males with two copies of the X chromosome and females with an X and a Y chromosome. Now you must be thinking that this is a little absurd, something like this might not even exist. But let me tell you, it definitely exists and it exists in every single bird that you can see around you. Birds have an opposite version of the XY system as their sex germination system. Let's take a closer look at this. Now before we move on and figure out how exactly the sex is getting determined in birds, let me ask you a question here. Don't you find this a little weird? I mean a few seconds ago I just told you that XX are always females and now I'm telling you that these are males? And vice versa, all of a sudden I was so convinced, we were so convinced that XY are males. But now they are females? What is going on? Now we would have still tried to make some sense out of this.   I mean they don't even share a single gene. Then why are we calling these sex chromosomes X and Y when they are nothing like X and Y? Now scientists were equally as confused as we are right now. So they decided to give new letters or assign new letters to these chromosomes that we can find only in birds. The sex chromosomes of course. So instead of calling them X and Y, they decided to call them Z and W. So instead of having XX males we now have ZZ males and instead of XY females we now have ZW females. Now that we have the whole letter and the name part sorted out, let me present this to you in a much clearer format. There we go. So now we have ZZ males and ZW females. Since birds have it the exact opposite of us, we now have homogematic males or males with the same gametes and heterogametic females or females with different gametes.  Meanwhile the females will give out either a Z or a W. Now based on this entire information I'm pretty sure you can come to one major conclusion. Can you guess what that is? That's right. This time moms are the one who gets to decide, whoops.  If the mom gives out a Z then we're gonna have a baby boy bird and if she gives out a W then we're gonna have a baby girl bird. Now let me give you something to think about here. You already know that the Y chromosome has the main sex gene which kind of goes ahead and activates the male parts in a baby and that's why the baby ends up becoming a boy. So with respect to that or with regards to that, what do you think happens in a bird? Given that they have the exact opposite system to ours. What do you think? Can you guess? Can you pause your screen here for a second and guess exactly what might happen? My first guess or my only guess when I started learning about this was that you know what? It's the exact opposite. So definitely W will have some kind of main sex gene that will go ahead and activate the female parts of the bird. I mean that makes complete sense right? And that's why it ends up becoming a female because why gets to decide everything here? I'm pretty sure W gets to do that too in birds. But turns out that I was wrong and if that is the guess that you had then you're wrong as well. It turns out that W doesn't have the main sex gene. In fact, W doesn't have a lot of sex genes to begin with. It only has maybe a couple. It barely has any sex genes that we can connect the entire sex determination system to. So if W doesn't have the sex genes, who does? I mean there's only one candidate left at this point so we're just going to go with a safe bet that it's them. Z is the larger of the two chromosomes and contains most of the sex linked genes including the main sex gene which kind of determines the entire process. Now you're probably thinking at this point that how is that even possible? Because both the male and the female birds have Z chromosomes in them. Then how exactly is the sex getting determined? Take a closer look. Tell me the one thing that jumps out at you from this particular image. Correct again. It's the number of the Z chromosomes. The number of the Z chromosomes differs in both the birds. The males have two of them and the female has only one. Accompanied by a W chromosome. So you see the sex determination pattern in birds does not really depend on one chromosome with the main sex gene like it does in us. In fact this depends on the amount of sex gene that a bird gets. So this pink colored thing that you see over here that's the main sex gene. So if the bird has two copies of the Z chromosome it will definitely have a higher amount of the main sex gene compared to the females which have only one copy.  On the other hand if it has a lesser amount of the main sex gene or just one copy of the Z chromosome then it's definitely going to be a female. So now you must be thinking that if it's the number of the Z chromosomes why do we need this W at all? Is W absolutely jobless doing nothing just existing? The answer to that question is we don't really know. We do have some theories which suggest that W kind of supports the Z chromosome in making the bird more female by contributing to a few traits or very specific traits but other than that we don't really have much of an answer. In fact this whole thing about the number of Z chromosomes determining the sex of the bird is also actually a theory but it's the best one that we have so far and it makes the most sense. But this is what really baffles me. Let's assume that W is jobless, that it doesn't really have anything to contribute to this entire sex determination system. In that case we should have found a bird that has only one Z chromosome because that's all it needs for it to become a female bird. So why can't we just have a bird with one Z chromosome and nothing else? So a bird with genotype Z0. But so far we have not found a bird like this anywhere. So these birds, these Z0 birds, they don't exist at least not that we know of but wait, wait, wait, wait. If you think that this is where the weird ends, think again because even though we might not find Z0 birds we do have Z0 butterflies. Wait, my butterfly has flown away, give me a second. There you go. We do have Z0 butterflies even though we don't have Z0 birds and yes, butterflies also follow the same system as the birds where they have a Z and a W chromosome and that's why the world of biology never ceases to amaze me and the world of animal sex is just downright weird but fascinating because if you think that all of this was complicated wait till you find out about the temperature-controlled turtle babies and the platypus which actually has 10 Z chromosomes. Yeah, good luck with that science.


Now we will see when the instinct asks us for collaboration and cooperation. Hamlin and Von Dey van the Root also adopt the moral tradition, harm and fairness-based definition of moral concerns that serves for them to distinguish morality from the amoral. What I have just said is that in a traditional way, there is a feeling of harm, we want to save ourselves from every loss. Mentally or intuitionally, we are more focused on fairness, justice is part of our responsibility and the decisions we make are influenced by our environment. That is why the decisions we make in the beginning are based on fairness. And this is where our brain decides whether we are going moral or amoral, whether we are talking about morality or immorality or immorality. So Tmasello sees cooperation, collaboration and joint commitment as moral ends in themselves and therefore part of the definition of morality or as social interactions that contribute to the development of moral judgment. He says that when a lot of moral ideas are being learned, then there are two things that are in collaboration and cooperation. To do something together, to help each other, to help each other, he says that this is good and that these values are learned. And this is the beginning of morality from here. Because we learn all age, empathy, sympathy, we learn to bond with people, we learn to sacrifice for people. So we will learn these things through collaboration from now on. Each point to young children's acts of inflicting harm and being harmed as significant contributors to the development of moral judgments regarding welfare. From here, he is aware that the two of us have the same problem. If the two of us are happy or our needs are the same, then if we help each other, we will try to give them the same happiness or player that we like, then this is a feeling of welfare. This is fairness. So his judgment here is based on the contrast and comparison. What do I like? What is better for me? What do I like? What do I like? My friend or the one I am going to collaborate with, he also likes the same. He also likes the same. So he should also get the same. So this is an equality and a matter of fairness. Then what collaborative and cooperative activities can take many forms and goals including ones for non-moral and morally wrong ends. Our psychologists say that collaboration and cooperation cannot be taken positively every time. Why can't it be taken positively? Because it can be done in a wrong way. If some children are doing something wrong, then others will collaborate with them or cooperate with them. And it will be wrong. They are making fun of a weak child of their own class. So start making fun of all of them. If someone starts smoking from one of them, then start smoking from the other. Then you collaborate with them and cooperate with them. You can't understand every form of justice. If it is positive, positive things, like in our Qur'an it is said that do good deeds and do not do bad deeds. So this is the case. The person who will do good deeds will collaborate with the one who will do good deeds. This value is the beginning of children's morals. That is to cooperate, do good deeds for each other, help each other, but for good deeds. So finding suggests that younger children form global normative judgments. So our researches tell us that children decide their good deeds and bad deeds by learning from the people of their own heart. The way the norm is adopted, the way the values are good there, they think they are good. The people of their idgid who are called bad are bad for them. So a positive environment can create good morals. Whether it is a child's home, his school, or his playground, where all the good rules are going on, they help each other, the children are playing, they are helping each other. So this will be a good environment. Children will learn morals here. But if it is a culture of killing, stealing, cheating, lying, then the children will collaborate with them. They will try to learn. So giving a positive environment, especially in the context of early childhood education, is very important in the context so that children grow up with their positive values.


Zach it seems like spring training just started but you already faced live hitters yesterday how did you feel on the mound? I felt good it's always good to face some hitters even though it's your own team so it's not that fun but I try to let them know what's coming I try to put myself in there she's this the first time they're facing a pitcher as well and I'm facing hitters so it was good to get the work in and get some guys swinging a little bit just to get the competitive juices back on. Does it give you an indication of where your stuff is at at this point so early?  I have to imagine this spring much different than a year ago you were still coming back from that Achilles issue do you feel a lot better? Yeah absolutely I mean I think the other day I was thinking about I was learning how to walk in the underwater treadmill about this time last year so big difference you know doing PFPs and just feeling like a normal healthy pitcher so it's good to be just another one of the guys. In what ways was it hard for you last year to get in the swing of things because I know I spoke with you towards the second half the season when you joined the team and you said your lower half still not a hundred percent? Yeah it was tough I didn't feel like my lower half ever kind of came around to sync up with my upper half my arm felt so good last year my legs and it was hit or miss one day I feel pretty good like I was really close to being myself and the next day I come there and I didn't feel very good and you know just the strength in my foot and my calf just wasn't there so I wasn't able to repeat my delivery and really be that consistent I found a way to to put some together some good outings at the end but this offseason I really focus on getting my strength back and it's a world of difference just from my bull pens and then the live BP the other day. What was it about your experience with the Yankees last year that led you to wanting to sign with them in free agency in this offseason? You know there was a couple things one of the bigger things for me was you know when I was in Baltimore I had a lot of success coming in New York and you know doing well in this division I felt like I wasn't able to show them what they had seen before I just based on the injury I just wasn't able to be myself and you know that little home run I gave up and it wasn't very little was actually the winning run that that was just I was like that's not me you know that's I didn't show them you know my best stuff like I did when I was a visiting player coming in and that was something that stuck in the back of my mind obviously having a chance to go the postseason again and win a World Series I feel like this team out of the options I had was the most likely to win a World Series and multiple you know that's why I was seeking a you know multi-year deal with the team I felt like it was gonna be competitive every year and I know with the ownership here that they're gonna not only get free agents but they're gonna make some trades at the deadline if they feel like they need to improve the team and that's big you know I want to be you know with a team that's all in and trying to win a World Series I know that's what they're gonna do here. Talk about going all in trying to win obviously you are back out of vino that bullpen again is setting up to be pretty nasty what are your views on what you guys have done with bullpen and how deadly you can be back there? Yeah it's it should be a lot of fun I always say as long as we can stay healthy and and guys pitch or you know not try to do too much I feel like there's a lot of guys have had a lot of success in the bullpen I feel like the biggest thing is not trying to like one up each other if that makes sense it's just trying to be yourselves you know for me I'm coming in a bullpen with guys to strike out a ton of guys and that's never been my thing I'll strike out you know my fair share but I'm not gonna strike out a hundred guys like Chapman and and you know out of vino and battances so I think trying to just continue to be myself and for everybody down there I think if we do that and we stay within ourselves we're gonna have a really really good bullpen. Was that any part of changing ZACH to ZACK and hopes you're gonna get a couple more strikeout? I hope it works out that way that would be nice. Is it even fun for you a guy that's been in the league for a long time to watch some of those guys throw with the stuff they have? Yeah it's interesting you know I you know I had a couple good guys in Baltimore that went in front of me but you know when you have seven guys that have the ability to to close on other teams and pitch in high-level situations it's fun you learn a lot you know guys are talking to me about my sneaker I'm talking to them about their breaking balls it's it's cool to be around a lot of guys with a lot of talent who have had a lot of success and you've just picked their brains I feel like and it's gonna make it's gonna make me better it's gonna make everybody I think in the pitching staff better because we're not just talking to relievers but I'm sitting there you know talking to Jay Hap talking to CeCe you know trying to get as much out of him for this last year as I can and then you know talking with Paxton who's had a lot of success so it's gonna be a fun year for the pitching staff. Zach thanks for the time. Hey Bet.


Yo, how's it going everybody? Today's a very interesting video as you can tell for a couple of reasons Number one. Yes, I shaved number two. Yes, I got a haircut. I think I look classy now number three What the heck we're playing a fan game. We haven't done that in so so long What is up with that and why is this fan game in particular? So gosh dang special well This is the most recent fan game by jelly Liam who you may know as the developer of the final night Series and they have a very very special fan game release for us today because this is actually a rejected Unfortunately fan game title so some very quick back story a couple of years ago actually in 2020 jelly Liam made a post saying scouting animators for a fan verse pitch and basically they announced that they were in talks with Scott to try and get a pitch made for the fan verse and for the past two years They've been working on exactly that and slowly over those two years. They were dropping hints and small little teasers nothing much I think the biggest thing we got was this banner on their Twitter Which showed off some sort of giant amalgamation and matronik and then a couple days ago He made a tweet saying I'm currently at a make or break point in my life if this doesn't go through I have little opportunity left in the field of game development, but either way You'll know what I've been up to for the last two years. Hopefully not in the way of me just dropping what could have been now Unfortunately, the pitch did not go through however. I would like to point out fortunately It doesn't seem like they will be quitting game development, which I'm very excited to hear But yeah, fortunately the pitch got declined for being quote too risky Whatever that means I couldn't be more ominous Scott But anyways, they put out a tweet saying we're excited to show you all what our pitch towards the fazbear fan verse initiative was The project we have been working on for the last two years Unfortunately after lengthy negotiations, we have been declined and the title that got revealed to us was Afton Built and you can see a terrifying look in William Afton's spring trap in the background and it looks insane already And yeah, that's exactly what we're gonna be checking out today the unfortunately rejected fan verse title But if you're excited nonetheless for Afton built hit the like button subscribe and let's hop into it Warning this game contains flashing lights loud noises and jump scares This is a proof of concept pre-budget demo and everything is subject to change the next few messages will inform you What is considered temporarily place order content includes player character animations most user interfaces cutscenes currently? animatics okay sound effects environmental models enemy and level music unfinished content includes level openings and endings Charms perk system and collectibles Williams in level Commentary AI manager for larger levels pre-level loadout system anything past the first level of the game unfinished content includes emails tapes papers and other forms of voice The music ended Background in the level save games full option menus springtrap suit piece collectibles the cult room linear story segments in each map optimization and general performance Okay, wow, okay choose a graphics option. Let's go balanced. I guess right in the middle. Hey, I don't want to skip You just running in even as an animatic that was awesome. Oh Afton built. Oh my god. Look at him. All right. I've actually had to turn down some of the settings So um if things look a little bad, I'm sorry, but I have to go with performance mode So we have new game in continuous get past the tutorial straight to the level select. I don't think I want to do that Let's just do new game Ooh, ooh home base an abandoned industrial unit. I reworked into my house and workshop Well, well, well look at me. So I've heard the the demo is about like 40 minutes So this might be a pretty long video. I like that loading screen though. Oh, here we go another animatic So we've got Afton home Transferring memory Okay, welcome the Afton robotics personal assistant device and do that in claws 374 of your employee handbook Since we value the physical fitness and strength of all our employees in case of emergencies We will start your routine with some exercise. This is awesome Connection away, please perform the minor physical efforts known as moving. Okay walk over to the garage door with W&D if you are unable to move please contact an Afton robotics representative at the number. Oh, I can jump to no number All right five five five eight zero. So I need to go to the door. They said Hello Afton. I just want to look at you man. Good. God. You're creepy. All right. Let's find that door, huh? Here's crouched down by bending your knee joints bending might okay. It's not control. Oh, it's Q Is that what that said? Oh, no C. Okay wonderful. We know we can depend on you making a quick escape if necessary Speaking of speed. How about you show us what you got? Well, I don't what I don't like the sound of showing you what I've got But I'll show you all I'm running baby. I'm running here. We go Congratulations, you've exceeded our last measured record of no connection to database Please contact your supervisor to collect your badge at the listed fee. Hey, so certain situations listed in class 87 It might be a safe bet to take to higher ground if you have not neglected your upper arm training routine You should be able to climb anything up to one point five times your height Okay, so I got a climb up this truck Here we go. Oh I made it ascend the catwalks. I can I see the catwalks. Can I make that jump hold on? Oh You betcha I can All right. We are on the catwalks. This looks awesome. That wasn't so awesome Make this jump. Come on. Pull yourself up. Heave boy. Heave. Oh What's up there? Almanus. All right, let's keep on walking keep on walking. Make sure you don't fall and What is this out this direction? Return power to the building. That's too much power. That's way too much power It's the perfect amount of power. Do I take fall damage? Do we think I help not? I Do but I'm alive and I live hey Freddy return to the workshop All right, how much do we want to bet that William Afton is not going to be in the same place? He was When we left him. Oh, no, he's still here All right, let's interact. You don't sound too good. Hand unit long time since I've been able to get out of that miserable suit After I do all my self one for making a work after all interesting It doesn't look like this Workshop is regulated Hello, yo, is anyone here me? Hello. Hello. Hello. Hello there.  I've I've just awoken from a very Terrible nightmare and I need a lot of help You're the one who freed me from the suit, correct? Yes, sir. Yes, not head. Yes, I See I Guess I owe you a favor for that I Apologize if this is a lot of information to take in right now if you can lift me out of the stock I'll give the liberty of explaining everything Okay Hello All right Judging by the look on your face You seem shocked that I'm even here and I'm sure you've got a lot of questions. You'd like answered a little bit Yeah, this form that I currently inhabit. It's less than ideal What the hand unit I've had if you're able to free me after so long So now that we're both here. Why don't we strike a deal? Oh, if you can help me regain possession of my true form I can show you endless Possibilities the type of things people people dream of like infinite pizza Over life itself. Well, we're just pizza. Well, we best get started. Let's see the calendar Yeah, calendar. Oh That doesn't look good. Oh, no, what's up? 2023 Hmm that makes things a little more complicated than I anticipated This material that we're after it has a shelf life. Okay, however, it can stay fresh and useful if it remains Inhabited like me for example This remnant we're after remnant Harder to obtain but I have no doubt that the two of us have the capabilities to acquire it Okay in order to protect my life's work of creation and Manufacturing the canisters that held the remnant were fitted with tamper locks that would ignite and burn If someone other than me tried to get a hold of them. Oh wow I've interfaced your goggles to detect these you should see it in your overlay now my overlay Okay.  We tried to expand our franchise to the Southwest and Arizona much further than the Western The managers had to pull the models down Ice packs because the plastic shells kept deforming from the heat. Hey, where'd you go man? Trust me? I never went back there if we find an animatronic with an Inhabited remnant core. There's a height chance. It'll be hostile and on guard mode Okay, we'll have to stun them music our surroundings before we're able to pry their tamper locks off, right? Try moving our friend here in front of that scooper arm Okay, I will say the game is a little quiet, so I apologize if at some ports it is quiet Scoot scoot. Where did you find this anyway? These things aren't exactly public knowledge. Hmm. I have my ways The power cord usually leads to the button to activate it. It should speak for itself. Right, right, okay Now how can I an individual? Get up there. Also, this is so interesting So we have the um like the the Freddy Hollow costume from FNAF 3 the scooper from sister location and also the the shocker the controlled shock also from Sister location. Oh, I made it. Oh what I do First order bring up my tool wheel from here. I can select my stun my stun bombs my stun bombs Stun bombs can be used to power electronics via their buttons with my Detainer and tablet. I can detonate bombs that are in sight middle mouse, okay? Okay now stun Freddy, right? Do-do oh, I gotta place it and now let's back up a bit Good blew me good blue middle mouse middle mouse. Okay, but not middle mouse.  Oh But that process can be very long our best bet is to disable the animatronic permanently Okay, do I do it again have some dynamite or highly explosive weapon relaying around it as it turns out Utilize the environment around us to finish it off for good Do you have a map lying around anywhere? I'll note down the locations of the active remnant course. Oh wait, can I? Now Freddy you say I will detonate Okay, that didn't do anything. All right a map. Sorry. I was messing around with uh with Freddy. All right. Yeah, so I I Kind of messed up saving Freddy. So he's still kind of possessed Whoa Okay, I did it. So did I save Freddy? I don't think I did I think I messed up Oh demo tutorials notice in this demo of Afton built you are given access to most of the game's tools Okay, sure. I'll just do it because it is my first playthrough camera. Let's place one right here. Oh, I see it Okay, so I can look around cameras and then get out Got it got it got it move around Okay, so we got a spotlight here.  All right. So yeah, this is just a pretty simple tutorial Getting you used to all the uh the mechanics. Oh, so I go to nevon mr.  Can dues garble Junkyard open yard remove the animatronic tamper locks Close all flooding valves. Oh, oh wow gain entry to flood control. I have so many things I need to do here. What? Dude, this place is awesome. So this is mr.  Yo, Fredbear Fredbear my man.  I have so much stuff.  What is that noise? Oh, oh my god Hello, what the frick are you? What do I do with you?  I have so much I have so many objectives, but I don't know what any of the mean Flow control please let me in question mark Nope. Okay. Cool. How do I get out of here? Hey end unit. Oh, I need a search Okay, wow, this is gonna take a while. Okay. I got it. Oh, I got it.  What animatronic are you? I got bolt cutters. I don't know from where Hey Okay, oh, it's just like a mungus Da da da George. Oh, man. Is he saying no, don't do that. I'm so confused. Okay green purple red blue Hey golden freddy. Do you get this just trapped me in a corner? I couldn't move. I couldn't do anything Foxy you son of a gun. That was a cool jump scare though. I liked uh I'm not gonna say I liked Being devoured by foxy because that that would be weird and I didn't like it, but it was cool And I'm glad I spear I fell in a hole Uh, can I get out? Oh, no. Oh, no Oh, what's this? Oh, I was supposed to do. Yeah. I know guys. I meant to do that guys I 100 percent meant to do that and also know how to get out of here See what I tell you. I just wanted to look at bonnie.  No thing on bonnie. All right, let's get this over with again. This says it's gonna be quiet This doesn't sound that quiet That's all I'm gonna say Like that that sounds quite loud Uh, but I I made it did I do it did I do it? No foxy. No foxy. No Bad foxy go bad fox go away. Yeah Yeah Oh, yeah, okay. Wow. I'm like halfway done with this Okay, I just got a new Awesome No, no, no That's a bad fox bad fox. All right. It says cut off cut loose the bonnie animatronic I did see the bonnie animatronic down that down that away You know near the death the fox of death unless that's a bonnie that does look like a bonnie Let's go to that bonnie. Let's see what that bonnie is all about. Hello bonnie Cut loose cut loose. Oh, hey Hey That sounded nasty Okay, so I did that Overcharge it.  Awesome. Now what? Electrocute do these others first. Uh remove the animatronic tamper locks and close all the flooding valves on the trench I think I can do the trench Oh, there's one Uh, don't die, man Awesome. Here. Let's close this up. Awesome. All right. That bonnie makes it a bit difficult to hear Especially if there's a killer fox around. I also wish I had a flashlight. Oh, uh, oh here we go Is that the last one? Uh, yes it was doesn't chase me That's good. Oh Never mind. That's a false alarm. Oh Can I do anything with you bonnie? Do you need to be blown up bonnie? Let's try blowing up bonnie That did not do anything. Oh wait. Oh wait. Let's try doing this.  Wait, hold on Fox out this way. Oh, boy. You move fast. You move fast. You move fast Ready ready ready go go. Maybe that is what I have to do. Okay, so I need to lower hit So I was on the right track He's just being a bit of a annoying foxy. Oh He's a very close foxy too. Put it on move move. He tricked me He tricked me that sly fox Please please please. I didn't get one If it was any other minigame besides. Hey press these buttons. I'd be I'd be killing it I'm so bad at these minigames.  I wish it was just like a mouse minigame Wow, I got like two Oh shoot. I'm not I'll be honest. I know I'm not the best at beating this section, but um We're slowly getting there. Whoa No, not there. Luckily the hitbox is pretty forgiving. How many I did? We're gonna find out This is always my safe spot. I've got a rhythm to it I run up here. I just walk over here. Then I jump down onto that How many do I have left? Just one. All right, this should be Oh, I I can lean. Awesome. This should be pretty Easy to get this one. Where'd he go? I don't know. He went somewhere. Let's go Come on Foxy, where'd you go? I see you. Oh my god. Done. Is he done? Is he done? Is he done dead?  What are I electrocute foxy? Awesome, but like comes always in the sewers. He smelled He's sniffing. That's a cool shot Oh, I pushed Bonnie into the sewers so he gets electrocuted Okay, I said I wasn't the best at the press the letters minigame, but we did it Is that it? I don't I don't see any more And I think the it did say at the start like nothing's finished besides like the first level not available in scott demo Yeah, yeah, so I think we're done here. This was sick if it turns out there is a bit more to do I of course will do a second video on this, but this was fun again I wasn't the best at that minigame. I know but I had fun. This was really fun I really do hope we can see more updates on this in the future I don't know if they're gonna keep working on this. I I don't know, but I would love Absolutely love to play more of this game. I really hope they do more with it because this is a fantastic idea I had a lot of fun. I Now playing the game and very sad it got rejected. I think this would have been a Fantastic addition to the fan verse, but that is going to do it for today's video Hey, if you want to see more fan games in the future hit the like button I did stop playing them after quite a while But if you do want to see me hop back into playing some more fanat fan games, let me know But thank you so much for watching this video and I'll see you all on the flip side. Goodbye