We have a nice holiday. All work. No, no. All work and all work. Trying to get a training desk, downside, all that. Casting. Now? Yeah, we got it. Okay. You got everybody here? Let's get started. Welcome. The Design Development Review Commission is made up of volunteers with expertise or interest in historic preservation and design. We generally meet on the second Thursday of the month to review cases. Staff to the commission are our urban design and historic preservation staff. They are available to answer questions if you have them, but please do not interrupt proceedings if you do indeed need to speak with one of them. The meeting generally proceeds with the staff calling the case and describing it. I will call for the applicant to come forward afterward to add to the basic description of the request if necessary or if the applicant wishes to do so. If so, the applicant should keep the presentation to 10 minutes or less. The commissioners will then have the opportunity to ask questions. At this point, I will ask if there is anyone in the audience who wishes to speak for or against the proposal. Audience comments should be kept to two minutes per person. If there is, the applicant will have an opportunity to respond. This rebuttal shall not exceed five minutes. In most of the cases, we will make a decision tonight after all information has been presented. If your case is denied or if you feel that our decision was made an error, you and anyone with standing have the opportunity to appeal it within 30 days of the decision. If you plan to speak about a specific project you must have signed in. The sheet was at the back and it's now in the front by the podium. Also, and so that members of the public understand, commissioners are under strict instructions to avoid discussing DDRC meetings and applications with members of the public or with each other outside of these proceedings to avoid ex parte communications. If you wish to speak during the course of these proceedings, please stand and raise your right hand. You affirm to tell the truth in these proceedings? Thank you. Could staff please call roll? Mr. Boknight. Here. Mr. Brim. Here. Ms. Moore. Here. Ms. Fuller-Wilt. Here. Mr. Wynn. Here. Mr. Savry. Here. We have quorum. Great. Does the agenda order still stand? We've had one change since publication under the historic version of the consent agenda. Item number three, 2009 Lincoln Street, a request for preliminary certification for the Bailey bill, has been deferred. The DDRC utilizes a consent agenda for those projects which require DDRC review, but which meet the guidelines and typically require no discussion. If anyone wishes to discuss an item on the consent agenda, I will ask that you speak up after the consent agenda is read and we can pull the item for discussion onto the regular agenda. If staff could please read the consent agenda. Certainly. Next item on the consent agenda is 1132 through 1136 Woodrow Street. This is a request for preliminary certification for the Bailey bill. The structure is in the Melrose Heights, Oakland Architectural Conservation District. The next item is 3213 Michigan Street, a request for design approval for exterior changes and preliminary certification for the Bailey bill. Again, this is in Melrose Heights, Oakland Architectural Conservation District. The next item is 3012 Lincoln Street, a request for preliminary certification for the Bailey bill. This is in Earlwood Protection Area A. The next item is 1310 Lady Street and 1224 Sumter Street. This is the Keenan Building. The request is for a certificate of site plan approval for an individual landmark, which also sits within the City Center Design Development District. And lastly is 1310 Lady Street once more. This is a request for design approval for exterior changes to the existing individual landmark. Is there anyone who wishes to take an item off the consent agenda for discussion? If not, could we have a motion to approve the consent agenda and the meeting minutes from December? To make a motion? I move that we approve the consent agenda and the minutes for last month's meeting. Is there a second? Okay. Have a vote, please. Mr. Bucknight. Yes. Mr. Brim. Yes. Ms. Moore. Yes. Ms. Fuller-Wilt. Yes. Mr. Nguyen. Yes. Mr. Sabre. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Could you present the first case, please? This is a request for a certificate of design approval for new construction on a vacant lot at the corner of Piccadilly and Gis Streets in the Granby Architectural Conservation District. It's addressed as 300 to 302 Piccadilly Street. This is just the second proposal for new construction in Granby since the district was created back in 2010. Granby is a unique neighborhood in which just three historic house forms exist. And on Piccadilly Street, just one of these three forms is present. Not only is there a little variation in size, style, scale and massing, but the variation in that area is down to less than a quarter of an inch. Staff has worked extensively with the applicants on the plans that are being presented today to ensure that the extreme consistency on the street is being continued. Staff finds that the plans are compatible with the guidelines and therefore will not go into detail regarding the plans, but we'll be happy to respond to any questions. So staff finds the proposal for new construction at 300 to 302 Piccadilly Street complies with section 5B of the Granby Architectural Conservation District Guidelines and recommends granting a certificate of design approval with the following conditions. The setback and height of the new structure will be consistent with adjacent structures. Roof pitch shall be 1212, 1212, 812 and 312 reading from the front to the rear of the structure. Facia cornerboards and trim shall visually match the historic trim found on adjacent millhouses. Doors shall be four panel or half light over two panel wood or fiberglass. Windows shall be one over one aluminum clad or wood. Sightings shall be smooth cement fiberboard or wood with a reveal of approximately four and a half inches. No metal vinyl or PVC products shall be used for any architectural feature. If visible from the public right of way mechanical units will be screened. Driveways will be concrete brick or granite and shall be no more than 12 feet in width and all details deferred to staff. Do you want to go through the slides or is the applicant here and wish to speak? Have you been sworn in? Hold up your right hand. Do you promise to tell the truth in these proceedings? And did you sign in? If you'd also sign in. State your name for the record. Michael Kennedy. And this is Keith Angcone. So we don't have a whole lot to add in addition to what you know the plans and everything else we've submitted but just want to say we're both excited about getting the project off the ground. We both went to the University of South Carolina and lived adjacent in Olympia in 2006 and we love the neighborhood and we're looking forward to be able to be a part of it long term. So thank you. Are there any questions for the applicants before they go? Thank you. Anybody who wishes to speak in support of the application? Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission. I'm Bob Gild with the Granby Mill Village Neighborhood Association and we want to endorse enthusiastically the proposed infill for 300 and Piccadilly and also the companion lot that you'll be hearing in the next case. We're very pleased that if this project goes forward it'll represent the first infill in Granby under the Architectural Conservation District Guidelines. We're very grateful for the staff, for Amy and Megan to work very closely with both the neighborhood and the developers to make this happen and it's really nice to see some progress. A personal note, my first year in law school I spent in the house that used to be on this very lot burned down one of the handful of losses in the neighborhood because largely the mill village remains intact but the few missing teeth that are on the block make a big difference in a streetscape that's relatively uniform as Megan was mentioning. So filling in those gaps is a really important step forward for restoring the architectural integrity of the neighborhood and so we want to enthusiastically endorse the proposal and thank the developers for their enthusiasm as well. Thank you. Would you like to speak? No. Anybody else who wants to speak for? You're the only one here so I guess not. Any comments before we move to a motion from the commissioners? I'm personally glad to see this happening. The missing teeth need to be filled in so this is a great way to do it. Would anybody like to make a motion? Let me ask one question. There are a lot of conditions with this and you're amenable to the conditions that staff has outlined. So just for the record you're saying yes. Good, okay. We can't really hear you but that's fine. I think the main thing is we understand that you're on board. So would anybody like to make a motion? I'll give it a whack. Okay, based on the evidence presented and section 5B of the Granby Architectural Conservation District, I move that the Design Development Review Commission approve a certificate of design approval for the 302 Piccadilly Street. That's the name of the project I guess. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. For the approval of design for 300 to 302 Piccadilly Street proposed, I'm sorry, with all details deferred to staff. Is there a second? Second. Any discussion? Do we have a vote please? Mr. Boknight. Yes. Mr. Brim. Yes. Ms. Fuller-Wilt. Yes. Ms. Moore. Yes. Mr. Sabre. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. Next case please. This is a request for a certificate of design approval for new construction on a vacant lot on Piccadilly Street in the Granby Architectural Conservation District. The plans submitted for this lot are identical to those from the previous case, so I don't think there's really any need to go into further detail. And the conditions for approval are identical, but I'll read them again. Staff finds the proposal for new construction at 300, or excuse me, 313 to 315 Piccadilly Street complies with section 5B of the Granby Architectural Conservation District guidelines and recommends granting a certificate of design approval with the following conditions. The setback and height of the new structure will be consistent with adjacent structures. Roof pitches shall be 12, 12, 12, 12, 8, 12, and 312, reading from the front to the rear of the structure. Facia, cornerboards, and trim shall visually match the historic trim found on adjacent millhouses. Doors shall be four-panel or half-light over two-panel wood or fiberglass. Windows shall be one-over-one aluminum clad or wood. Siding shall be smooth cement fiberboard or wood with a reveal of approximately four-and-a-half inches. No metal, vinyl, or PVC product shall be used for any architectural feature. If visible from the public right-of-way mechanical units will be screened. Driveways will be concrete, brick, or granite, and shall be no more than 12 feet in width, and I'll do details defer to staff. Thank you. Does the applicant wish to speak? Does anybody wish to speak in support? It would be the same comments. Okay. So, I guess at this point I'll ask for a motion. This pillow will please. You've had practice. This will be so much better. Right, that's great, thanks. Well, may I just ask, what is the name of the project? That's where I kind of got. New construction. Okay, based on the evidence presented and Section 5B of the Granby Architectural Conservation District, I move that the Design Development Review Commission approve a certificate of design approval for new construction proposed at 313-315 Piccadilly Street with all details deferred to staff. Is there a second? Second. Any discussion? Do we have a vote, please? Mr. Bocknight? Yes. Mr. Brum? Yes. Ms. Fuller-Wilt? Yes. Ms. Moore? Yes. Mr. Wynn? Yes. Mr. Savry? Yes. Motion passes. Wonderful. I think that's the end of our cases, and I don't believe, well, correct me if I'm wrong, does anybody have anything that they want to move into to note we're just keeping executive session under other business on the agenda, so we'll just look to hear from y'all if you feel the need for it. If not, we don't need to move into it. I think we're good. In that case, could I have a motion to adjourn? So moved. Second? Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. All adjourned. Thank you. Thank you. How about that? That's a record. That was quick. I can't not go back to work now. I feel guilty. I gotta go back to work.


This is theCUBE, live from the Moscone Center in San Francisco. This is SiliconANGLE's continuous coverage of VMworld 2010. Now, Inside theCUBE. We're back to continuous coverage of VMworld 2010 live. I'm John Furrier from SiliconANGLE. We are in theCUBE. theCUBE is a social media broadcast that acquires knowledge, and this segment is going to be very fun. We have a group of entrepreneurs part of the Cloud Computing Club, and I'm proud to say that I was one of the co-founders of with Nate Demaco and James Waters, and these guys have been in the trenches from Cloud from the beginning, and I'd like to introduce to my left is Rich Miller, Bernard Golden, and Randy Bias. So these guys are entrepreneurs. They've been out in the field, ton of experience in the business. Cloud has arrived. They were there at the beginning. So we're going to share our experiences about why the Cloud is so big and relevant and entrepreneurship. What are the opportunities for startups? Because there is a lot of opportunity, VMware is putting forth a framework that is going to enable a lot of growth. And we heard from Todd Nielsen that for every dollar of VMware license, there's going to be about $15 of ecosystem money. So that's money. And the VC panel we had here on Wednesday was talking about huge dollars going into Cloud. So we're going to get the reality of kind of what's real, some proof points, and so the first question will go right down the line. We'll start with Rich. What is the reality of Cloud? And just at a high level, the entrepreneurial opportunities, it's a shift, it's big, it's relevant, it's happening right now, and we're on the scene here at Moscone. Well, there are two baskets, as I see it. Entrepreneurially, you're looking at Cloud backward, taking what's existing, a lot of legacy stuff, making it work appropriately, making it work the way you'd like it to work in a Cloud, getting all the benefits. Then huge entrepreneurial opportunities, Cloud forward, building new apps, Greenfield, all things web, web app, looking at this as a, you know, doing new things, not trying to repeat the old. And if you drop them into those two categories, enterprise is paying first for the legacy, but where the real fun is, and where the entrepreneurs really start to kind of converge, is on the Cloud forward stuff. Cloud forward, great message, good angle there. Bernard, what's your angle on this? Well, we see a lot going on in apps. I was in a breakfast this morning, and basically the whole message, the whole theme was apps, kind of driving everything, which is interesting, because it's kind of a change from a lot of IT organizations. Traditionally they've been very infrastructure focused, so a lot of stuff around apps, and stuff that helps apps. The other thing that came out of that breakfast was a lot about Cloud management. How do you manage these environments? How do you manage a lot of discussion about end-to-end management instead of siloed management? For sure there's great opportunity there. I don't know how to solve the problem, but there's great opportunity around that. Randy, you got a growing business right now. You started as an entrepreneur, and you grew a business, you're growing like crazy. You're on the doorstep of all the cloud scaling. Cloudscaling.com is your organization. Talk about your experience and what you see going forward. So the ecosystem is growing. There's a lot of people out there in the trenches deploying. As VMware changed with this VMworld this week, I mean, what's different, and what are you guys seeing from your customers and prospective customers in the environment out there? And what are the key issues holding things back, or what are the key issues that are going to accelerate real cloud deployments? And cloud service providers are part of this show too, and that's a new dynamic we're seeing. Well, one of the things that's pretty obvious about this show, and kind of you could almost draw a bright line over the course of the last year or 18 months, is that now we're no longer talking as much about infrastructure, getting that right, whether it's in the public cloud or in the enterprise. Today we're talking about platform, and not so much platform as a service, but here what you're looking at is the constructor, the construction kits, the piece parts by which you start putting together platforms and then specific software applications that are cloud-oriented. This show, both the influence of Spring, vFabric, all of that, the cloud, the director, all of that starting to look at moving up the food chain, much more about platform, much more about the construction of applications. On a scale of one to 10 rich, real deal, 10 being real deal, with the Spring source framework or zero non-starter. Spring, oh, it's already in the bag. It is, this is a real deal. What we have here is the beginnings of truly platforms, whether they're built inside the enterprise or platforms as a service, the construction kits for real applications, absolutely.  Well, what I'll say is that what we hear about a lot and what we work on a lot is security. A lot of companies saying how do I secure my app, particularly in a public cloud environment? What do we do around that? Something that's kind of a second order is we get called in a lot with companies that say I put my application up in a public cloud, and the magic's supposed to be that it's scalable. How come my app's not scaling? And then we end up doing a lot of architecture reworking. So I think architecture is a big deal. This is a, if you want to take advantage of cloud computing characteristics, your application has to be ready to do that. So I think that that's a big challenge. Drill down on the architecture thing and it's not scaling thing. Just expand on that a little bit. What are the issues there? Well, the vision is somehow, automagically, load goes up and the application starts, spawns extra resources, extra instances. In the past, the way that happened was maybe had to provision hardware and then admin had to sort of go in and reconfigure everything. The application had to be brought down, brought back up. If you want to move that from a hands-on thing to an automagically kind of thing, your application has to be written such that it can gracefully add and subtract resources. You have to have a management framework that supports that. And those are new kinds of things basically because the old model was very static, very hands-on. So those kinds of challenges or concerns that we run into a lot? Randy, you're getting your hands dirty out there. You're stitching all these things together and you got a lot of successes. Talk about your experiences and things you've learned that were surprises and things that were not surprises and challenges going forward. The two pioneers in cloud computing, they're folks like Amazon and Google and what they have really pioneered is operating in a massive scale. I mean, moving from enterprise computing to cloud computing is like moving from the assembly line mechanism for manufacturing cars to the robotics factory mechanism for manufacturing cars. It's very, very different. If you actually look at Amazon's operations team, there's two core components. Infrastructure engineering which writes software that automates hardware and data center operations which changes out the hardware. And there's nobody in between. Just like in a robotics factory for cars, you have people who design the robotics in the factory and you have the people who do QA on the line and do maintenance on the robots. And there's really nobody in between. And so, when you go and you look at these guys and what that means and you talk about scalability like Bernard's talking about, you'll notice that somebody like Google has a huge number of sort of horizontal services, something like Google FS or Bigtable or MapReduce which are sort of these horizontal services across the entire data center that every single application leverages. And that's how a single application for Google is able to get scale. But when you look inside an enterprise data center, every single application is its own silo, sometimes all the way down through the network and the storage. And that's part of the reason why it's difficult to scale. There are also application architectural constraints, of course, which somebody like Bernard can help you out with. But the fundamental way that you're actually designing the data center and how you provide horizontal services is also what's going to enable true platform as a service to work on top of any infrastructure as a service. So if you kind of ignore one to the detriment of the other, if you don't build an infrastructure as a service right with those horizontal service layers, then you can't really do the rest of the job. We had theCUBE down in Orlando for SAP event. We had the CIO of Levi Strauss-Tom Peck on it. And one of the things that came out of that conversation, Randy, was busting down the silos. And he absolutely saying, from his organization standpoint, he wants to bust down those silos. What can you share?  What's the team configuration like? What's the dynamic? And just what are some of the conversations that you have? People like, hey, we love you. And all of a sudden we can't do that. I mean, we've talked at the cloud clubs about some of the politics and just riff on that a little bit. It's going to be scary. Are you sure you want me to go there? Yeah, go ahead. We've got to bring it out on theCUBE. In our most successful engagements, we basically sideline the CIO and his entire stack because they wanted to do enterprise computing with a cloud label on top of it instead of real cloud computing. And they were obstructionist and they did not know how to desiloize themselves. I mean, if you think about it, Enterprise IT as a centralized department has effectively been a monopoly inside of that each of those enterprises for 30 years. And they do not understand how to fix their own monopoly. And the only way that you break down a monopoly is through competition and through funding those successful competitors. That's part of why you see Salesforce.com being so successful in the marketplace. Their core competition for the longest time was internal implementations as CRM. And so if you really want to build a real deal cloud today, you've either got to have a CIO who's a visionary and is willing to make significant dramatic changes to the organization. Or you have to sideline the CIO in a stack and you actually have to go rogue and you have to build out a whole separate cloud division, build out true cloud computing there and then somehow roll that back in or roll IT under it at a later date. How do entrepreneurs out there learn from that? So what would you share? Obviously sideline in the CIO is always kind of a rogue. It's not a real long-term strategy but you want to get the CIO there but what you're basically saying is is that CIOs are doing it because they're under pressure. CFOs, CIOs under pressure and they're saying, just do cloud and they want to go cloud but the monopoly if you will, kind of like an old mainframe mindset is pushing back. And what they'll do is they'll throw some cloud out there and call it cloud, right? Is that what you're saying? And they're not really doing real cloud? Is that what you're saying? I'm saying that just running, just providing virtual servers on demand is not a cloud. If you look at the bar that an Amazon or a Google or the pioneers in cloud are set, it's about very low friction self-service IT capabilities which can only be delivered through automation. And I'll tell you a brief story about a colleague of mine who's now at VMware. I don't want to mention his name, he was at Credit Suisse. They built one of the first real deal clouds there five years ago and as soon as they had it up, they had a self-service portal and UI and API and everything as soon as they brought it up, they put in a ticket wall because the IT support staff felt threatened that people could turn on their own servers and they didn't want them to. So they said, fill out a ticket and then we'll use your password and your credentials to turn on a server for you. So that's the sort of mindset that's been broken down. That facade was needed to keep the heat shield almost from the attacks, right? From the sabotage? Is that what you, yeah? It's not so much sabotage. It's, you know, any organization that builds up is going to send out the antibodies whenever you put something really distinctive and new in it and to Randy's point and actually to Bernard's about architecture, if you try to take the way things have been built up until now and just drop them into a set of virtualized servers and say, that's cloud, it isn't. It's basically taking a, and creating a virtual version of your old data center. That's not going to get you where you want to go. Okay, so play out how you think it's going to go down. Do you guys think it's going to be organically bottom up or top down or both? I mean, how is this going to be like client server kind of evolve that way? You know, some PCs were hanging around, lands came around.  Can I ask you something? I was very interested. I heard a guy from Forrester this morning talk and if you might know, Forrester came out with a report not too long ago that it was something like building your own private cloud.  And the interesting stat that he came out with was if you ask enterprise developers, something like 25% of them are doing cloud based stuff, typically in Amazon. If you go to the infrastructure group, something like 6% of them say, oh yeah, we're doing something around cloud. And that told me two things. One, there's a lot of stuff going on that is stealthy or semi-stealthy. And the second is, there's a big bow wave of stuff that's being done up in some public provider that's going to somehow go into production. And I don't know if that's going to go into production in that public provider, or if eventually the development team is going to come back to the ops team and say, I've got a gift for you. I'd like you to start running it. And by the way, it's designed as a cloud, it's architectures as a cloud, and you need to have the infrastructure to support that. So it's a very interesting strategy. Open the present, hey, I happen to have a cloud right here. Well, so it's a very, to me, that was a very interesting set of stats because that implies there's a lot of impending change coming down the road toward internal IT groups. Well, we've talked about bursting out, taking the enterprise and bursting out to the cloud. A lot of the app development, a lot of the pre-production versions of these apps exist in the cloud. And what's going to happen is, as soon as you open the door and people are feeling safe enough, it's going to be inbound, not bursting out, it's going to be bursting in. Randy, one of the things I'm hearing is that data security is the number one issue around cloud. Can you talk a little bit about that from your experience? So is that true or is it not true? I think it's a little overblown. I mean, security's definitely a concern. I mean, you would be foolish not to be concerned about it, but I think you are going to take the same steps you would if you were going to use an outsourced data center facility, managed hosting. I mean, it's not, I think one of the things that's really humorous about this is people get really worried about the hypervisor when the hypervisors are relatively proven, relatively secure technology, but then they ignore things like VLANs, which are completely unauthenticated and everybody assumes they're secure, but in actually a cloud environment, they're far less secure. So there's a weird disconnect between what is a real security issue in the cloud and what people's concerns are, because they don't understand the underlying technologies or structure so much. And then when you look at some of the folks who are building certain offerings, there are kind of on-demand private cloud offerings that people are working on where you're not going to share your server and pretty much all those issues go away. And so it's just, it's really, some things have changed, most have remained the same. If you take your same kinds of ways that you go about enforcing security today behind the firewall and bring them out to the cloud, they're mostly tree-as-like. Actually, not to confuse the issue, you've got security and then you've got the pragmatic issues of compliance. Most of these people, most of these organizations live under a cloud, if you'll pardon the expression, which is their requirement to be compliant with various kinds of regulation, whether it's defined by the industry, by the enterprise, regulatory, and being compliant means hitting the checklist. Those checklists have been built on the back of last-generation's architectures, last-generation's technologies. How do you determine whether a cloud implementation of a production app is compliant? These guys are very conservative if there's any risk of not meeting compliance. Well, that's a big message here. That was a big message here for VMware in this hybrid cloud was that compliance was one of the things that they were wrapping around that. I mean, is that a real deal? Is that going to be good? Is that going to be no big deal? I think compliance has to change not so much the technology. I mean, really, what do we think is valid and all of these aspects of compliance have got to be revisited? So I was doing security before a lot of the regulations went in for compliance. And in the early days, kind of mid-90s, the focus was around actually building secure systems. And there was a certain amount of best practices that came out of that. And then those were codified into a lot of the regulations. And those codifications of those best practices are about 10 or 15 years old a lot of the time. And so the way that they don't translate to the cloud is if you just take them piece, if you just say, look, we have to have perimeter firewall. You're on a cloud and where are you going to put your perimeter firewall? There's no perimeter, right? But should you have host-based firewalls? Should you have intrusion detection? Yeah, all of that translates. The problem is is that you have to, we've been moving away from a perimeterized world for 15 plus years, but you still see a lot of organizations, security organizations that don't know how to provide real deal security, clinging to what's easiest as opposed to trying to figure out what is real security? How does that mesh with the compliance requirements they have and coming up with a strategy that melds those two? And most of those strategies will actually translate directly to the cloud because it's about bringing the security closer to the data. Absolutely. One of the things that's happening here, guys, is cloud service providers are very visible in the announcements and IT's changing and that IT can provide the kinds of services that cloud service providers can provide. And Dave Vellante, Wikibon and I were talking about, well, that might not be true that cloud service providers will always stay at the bit ahead. And we had Verizon on yesterday talking about some of their things. Is the cloud service provider model going to be ahead of IT? And will that be the security compliance component of IT? How do you guys see the whole cloud service provider evolving all the above observations, predictions? To believe that somebody like Verizon is at the leading edge of implementing cloud services is, well, I don't want to dig on them too much, but it doesn't really make sense. If you actually look at the leader, that's Amazon. And in 2009, Amazon had 43 major releases, four per month. Who can keep up with that pace? Google, Yahoo, maybe Microsoft, but certainly not any of the major telco service providers are not geared up to be software development or featured delivery shops. And the same can be said of most IT departments who look at any of these projects as being two to three year kinds of engagements that they're going to do six to nine months to do diligence on. In our engagement with the largest telco in Korea, one of the largest in Asia-Pac, we stood up their private cloud in eight weeks. Eight weeks, soup to nuts. So what's the prediction on the viability and position of the cloud service providers? These guys have to get in the game. They've got to build out more capabilities and they've got to stop worrying about the virtualization piece, which is trivial, and start thinking about the portfolio of services that run on top of that. Platform as a service offering, mobile device offerings, integration to 3G and wireless systems, enabling new mobile apps, social media apps. They've really got to think about how what's the new set of cloud applications that's driving Amazon to 80,000 servers and more than half a million VMs in four years time? What is that? I mean, the enterprise is not adopting right now. These guys are going to get in the game by actually going to where the fire is, not where the smoke is, and then they've got to actually build cloud-class systems in the same way that Amazon or Google does, and they've got to have an ecosystem of services that actually allows them to be competitive on a portfolio basis, not on a virtual machine basis. You don't feel strongly about that, do you Randy? No, I don't feel strongly about that. They'll distinguish themselves on the basis of either markets they serve, geographic markets, industries, or the collections of added value features that they'll specialize in. Okay, final question to wrap up guys, because I look at that clock, we're a little bit long. What is the outlook of cloud? And just give your perspective, just from your entrepreneurial position, and also as a practitioner and as a guru, all of you guys are there in the trenches, you're building businesses, you're getting stuff done. Just share in your mind what this future will unroll to look like. I mean, will it really be game-changing? What are some of the things that you may see? What is your vision? Well, it already is a game change. What the focus is right now for the next few years, it's going to be all ops and apps. I mean, it's operations making the management of the infrastructure work correctly, and building the next generation, the cloud forward apps. Full stop. Bernard? Where do you go from that? Well. Oh, your perspective. I mean, you're in there. The thing that, you know, is there's no question in my mind in five years or 10 years, we will look back on the way IT has been done with this kind of very manual, very long time.  You'll just go, you know, yeah, that was quaint and that was good, but there's a reason why we don't do that anymore. Dialing a phone. And we're dialing a phone. And so I, for sure, there's no question. There's going to be a lot of pain between now and year X. And that pain is going to be localized into different groups. But for sure, this is the way IT's going to be done in the future. No question about that. This is the biggest disruption that there has been to the IT industry in 30 years. And it will be a 20 year transition. And if you look at how many mainframe companies are still standing in the same way that they were standing before, that just tells you the amount of opportunity there is. It is huge. There are all kinds of ways for you to figure out parts of this equation. Solutions for different parts of the problems here, which are enormous, as Bernard and Rich can tell you. I mean, there's just a huge number of problems to solve here. There's all kinds of clever ways that you can get in the game and you can be involved and you could be part of the disruption rather than be part of the disrupted. And that would be my key message. Disrupt.  We'll be covering it on cloudangle.com and siliconangle.com. Thanks guys so much. Rich Miller, Bernard Golden, and Randy Bias in the trenches, true entrepreneurs. Been there, done that from the beginning and now going to ride the wave. So good luck with everything and we'll check back in with you. Thank you so much. Thanks John.


We delay the start of our scheduled program to bring you a bulletin from CBS News. Washington. The State Department has issued a statement in response to the proposal by Jacob Malik, the Soviet delegate to the United Nations for a ceasefire in Korea. The State Department said that if Malik's proposal is more than propaganda, adequate means for discussion and end to the conflict are available. The State Department said we are ready to play our part. This bulletin has come to you from CBS News. We now resume our regular program. Broadway's My Beat from Times Square to Columbus Circle, the gaudiest, the most violent, the lonesomest mile in the world. Broadway's My Beat with Larry Thor as Detective Danny Clover. The nighttime starts at the river before it closes over Broadway. A wind drifts in with the moistened shadows, flings them into the street, flattens them against the gutter, picks a man waiting for a bus and wraps darkness around him. And a light comes on, and another, and down the street there where the crowd has gathered against the traffic signal, high above them a neon sputters, flames. The spectaculars dance, somebody runs into the street and yells, come on, and everybody does. Night has come to Broadway. And where I was, there was a wind. The built-in wind, a thing composed of poor ventilation, tears, shared and unshared, and bottled chemicals. It was the basic ingredient of the city morgue, though not to be found on blueprints or bills of specifications. It was something new to the man walking beside me. This place? Just take it easy, Mr. Larson. I'll tell you something. I guess it'll sound funny. I've read about places like this, and I've closed my mind to what I read. I guess I never wanted to visualize anything. Right here, Mr. Larson. What was your daughter wearing? Mrs. Larson wrote it down for me. You see, I wasn't home when Ruth went to the movie, so Mrs. Larson... Ruth was wearing a skirt and blouse, pink bobby socks and saddle shoes. I guess you want to know this, too. She was five feet one, she was 14 in May. She had brown hair and brown eyes. And I want you to know, Mr. Clover, I guess all fathers feel the same way. My Ruth was... Well, our friend said she was a remarkable child. She's going... We're going to send it to... under that sheet. This girl was found in a vacant lot between your home and the theater your wife mentioned when she called. How... I mean... Look, you know I... Beaten, fractured skull. I have to look, don't I? Yes. If it's your daughter. Ruth's a nice girl. She started to go to parties with boys, and she always gets home by 11 o'clock. She's going to be a dancer. When people come to the house, she dances for them. Mr. Larson... You see, as I... as I told you... Before... Ruth... Ruthie... Who did it? What monster? Who did it to you? Who? The shivering with a scurry from wall to wall enraged at the wound the death of his child would clawed across his heart, torn inside his throat. The helpless, futile rage of the animal whose small range of understanding has been kicked, beaten, thrown against the barbed wall of violence. Not once. Not once more did he look at his child. Now try only to wipe out the memory. Try to strangle it long ago laughter and sobs that the child had let echo through him. And finally, the collapse. The heap on the concrete floor. When you call quietly to the officer on duty to help you lift the men carry him to a place where he can sleep away the fury of his dead. Then back to your office and close the door on it. Stand at the window, watching the squalls of the night time wash against it, beat against it. Then stare at the walls. Then hear the door open for it to let it all in again. Danny? What do you want? Dr. Sinski's report. He was busy on another. He asked me to bring it to you, so... Leave it on my desk. Not going to look at it, Danny? Why? I know what's in it. I thought I did too until I glanced it over on the way to your office. You better take a look at it. You're so eager I don't want to spoil it for you. Tell me about it, Muggevin. You tell me. I'm Muggevin. And this one's no different. Is that all, Muggevin? That's what I've been trying to tell you. This one is different. Just what you saw when you first found her. That's what's in the report.  Nothing else. Give me another motive. Why, a 14-year-old child... Clover speaking. Sergeant Tartaglia, at this end, homicide, Danny. Woman in backyard of house at 1845 West 11. People named Murray. Upstairs wants you on it. Shall I tell him you're agreeable, Danny? Tell him I'm... bring me a motive, Muggevin. Upstairs wants me to run an errand. She's over here, Mr. Clover. Right here. Dead. Beaten. I'd say her skull had been fractured, Mr. Murray. I don't understand it. I just don't understand it. Tell me what happened. We were sitting in the library. A knock came on the back door. I wanted to answer it, but Beatrice said I looked so comfortable. There was just you, too, in the library. You and your wife. And Sis. Sis? My sister, Claudia. She can't hear anything. She's deaf. She never goes out of the house. I take care of her. Who's in the house with her now? Who's playing that organ? Oh, Sis plays. I see. Go ahead. Well, there was this knock on the door, and Beatrice went to the door, and I heard her talking to someone. At least I think I did. I want you to know I'm not sure about that. I kept reading, that's all. Sis was practicing. Didn't your wife scream? Didn't you hear anything? No, no, no I didn't. I happened to look up my book a little later, after she went to the back door. How much later? Well, I don't know. I looked up, and she still wasn't there. She hadn't come back yet from answering that knock on the door. That's right. So, I went out back. The back door was still open, but there wasn't anybody there. I called to her, and then I started toward the alley, and I stumbled. I stumbled over Beatrice. Then what did you do? Well, I called the police, and then I told Sis what had happened. You speak sign language? Yes, I learned it when I was very young, so that I could speak with Sis. She's been with me all the time. How long have you been married? Fourteen years. Why, what's that got to do? Happily. Course happily. Do you have any children? No, no, that's something Beatrice and I agreed on. Sis needs taking care of, and Beatrice is always so busy. Busy? Busy doing what? Clubs and auxiliaries, you know. She was well-liked, got things done. She was admired and well-liked.  Nobody would want to kill Beatrice. Nobody. Mr. Murray. She was a middle-aged woman, Mr. Clover. Everybody she knew was her friend. She did charity work. People came with troubles. Anybody. She'd help them. Why would anybody want to kill her? What motive would he have? What motive, Mr. Clover? It was there again. What motive?  What motive for that? And for Mrs. Beatrice Murray, admired, liked, charitable, a woman to whom the trouble came, a childless woman who sat in the evening and sewed together the patchwork of her day while her husband read and his sister released the music she couldn't hear. What motive for that brutal death? Because you find no answer, share it with Dr. Sinski. Ask the question of him, burden the gentle doctor with it. You put me a question, Danny, that is not strictly in my department or in my education. Mind if I bum another cigarette? Oh, here. Up south. Thanks. You've been with us a long time, Doctor. Some of it must have rubbed off. Danny, I deal only in known quantities. You boys bring me the wounds you find I wash them, bandage them.  Like I know, like I know my name, your name, that this Mrs. Murray was murdered by the butt of the same gun that hammered away the life of the child. Why? Tell me why? I'll go out and buy my own pack of cigarettes. If I had gold, you could have it, Danny, no strings to it. No. For the question you ask, go consult a specialist, a man who puts the microscope of his training to the emotions. The department psychiatrist? Yes, to him. Perhaps he will agree with me.  I've read about them, had them screaming in my office. They dream up hate against themselves. For this they kill. An animal, a child, a woman. Excuse me, Danny. Please. Are you looking for me, Geno? Yes, Danny. Fresh homicide. Alley on West 10th. Muckerman's got a squad car waiting now. Let me finish my cigarette on a tar-tag, Leo. Sure, Danny. We're sure, if you want. It's finished. Yeah. Put your flash on her. Hold it. Hold it right there. Where's that music coming from? The apartment upstairs. Danny, the back of her head, it's... Uh-huh. Keep your flash still. We've seen it two times already. In a short space. This makes three. It made three. The woman staring into the beam of the flashlight Muckerman held close to her face, staring in the final disbelief that this had happened to her in this place, in this time. She lay in awkwardness, her dress disarranged, her hand where it had frozen trying to straighten the wisp of blood clotted hair under her black straw hat. The alley wind found the white lace at her throat, riffled it, and the murdered woman made three. You are listening to Broadway's My Beat, written by Morton Fine and David Friedkin with Larry Thor as Detective Danny Clover. The Peggy Lee Show, bowed in over most of these same CBS stations last Sunday night. Folks who heard it will be back tomorrow for more of Peggy's charm, Peggy's vocals, Peggy's previews of coming popular musical events. Enjoy the Peggy Lee Show for lighthearted and summer listening at the Starz Address. The night music of summer spills into Broadway from the scarred throats of the loudspeakers hanging over the record shops. And this summer's kids in the off-the-shoulder cottons and the transparent California sports shirts squeeze each other into the doorways and lap it up. And then someone shrills a new diversion in a new shop window on a new corner and Broadway's youth rebops on down to it. It's an old ceremony on Broadway that's dancing in the streets in the sweating barker with a fistful of passes to happy upstairs lands just the price of the amusement tax, kid. That's old, too. A girl in the swimsuit lying on the billboard beach, never aging, but old. And the touch of summer's night on your eyelids, that's familiar, too. It's all happened to you before. And where I was, where Muggevin was, it had happened before, too. To a 14-year-old girl named Ruth, to Mrs. Beaters Murray, and now to the woman lying dead in an alley not feeling the touch of the man who at first timidly and then with effort twisted the purse out of her hand. She was holding on to it so tight, Danny. Open it. So tight. Yeah. Killed the same way as the other two, wouldn't you say, Danny? Uh-huh. Maybe our fair city's being honored with a mad killer, huh? Maybe.  Looks like it. How long does it take to go through the purse, Muggevin? Just sorting the unnecessary stuff, Danny. Tissues, compact, change purse, Bobby pins. The cell slipped for... Let me see. Hold the flash a minute, Danny. Yeah. There for China wear. Tortoise chocone with silver edging. That's all no identification. Well, I haven't tried this inside flat yet, Danny. Yeah, here it is. New Social Security card made out to... Hold it again. Alma Russell, 4212 6th Avenue. That's around 8th Street, Danny. Maybe she was on her way home, took this alley and cuts through to 6th. Killer knew she took it sometimes, waited for her here, slugged her, and made sure she was dead. Got a confession, Danny, it puzzles me. You alone in the world? Three of them dead. That girl, that woman with her husband and the sister who plays the organ. No, this one. I could understand it if... If what? There wasn't a mark on him, Danny, other than the beating from the gun, but not a mark. And this girl's young. About 25, I'd say. Pretty, neat, clean. I bet she was attractive. Sweet. What are you building, Magda? We've had him before, Danny. The guys who wait in alleys go to moving picture houses, talk to little girls, and they're making a lot. This kind we've had before. And in a way I could understand it. But the killer who... You said he was sick. Dr. Sinski called him a paranoid. Whatever they call him, it scares me. He's sick. I got her niece, lives three blocks from me with my brother. She's... Funny. You're trying to talk about her like the girl's father did. Go call them, Lord Magda. Danny, the thought that it could happen... Go call them. I'll wait for you. And in a little while, the young woman who had hugged death in an alley was attended to by gentle people, which is the miracle of violent death in a great city. The intern, the stranger in the white jacket, knelt beside her and shook his head and thought a thought that included both of them. An ambulance driver looked at her and bit his lip when he put her on the stretcher. Then the alley was no longer remarkable. It resolved back unto itself. A play of refuse, newings in the shortcut home. It was the end of something or another. For me, it was the end of the day, home now in bed. Adjust the mind not to dream. This can be done by a policeman assigned a homicide. Sleep the night through and wake and have the coffee and read the paper and get to work. Going out of the address on 10th Street because a girl named Elmer Russell once lived there. Ring the bell. Adjust your mind again to the fact that you're going to talk about the murder of a young woman at 8.30 in the morning. You from the police? Yes, I am. Come in. In here, the kitchen. Sit down. Thanks. What's your name? Danny Clover. Mine's Perdan, Ethel Perdan. I'm mine host to the borders. Had your coffee yet, Danny? Uh-huh. Me too. You won't mind if I try making up this face of mine, do you? I say make it up because that's the phrase that she was... How is it that you're expecting the police, Mrs. Perdan? Well, I read them more in papers, don't I? Elmer got killed, didn't she? She lived here, didn't she? So who should I expect? Humphrey Bogart? Yeah. How does the lipstick look, Danny? Kissable or otherwise? Otherwise, huh? Look, Mrs. Perdan, I want you to tell me everything you can about Elmer Russell. Sure, sure. Can you reach that mascara, Danny? Yeah, right there in the shelf, see? Thanks. What about Elmer? I'm made. Clean, sweeps, dust, a buck an hour. Who'd she work for? Oh, she never said. Quit a job a couple of weeks ago. I think she got another one just the other day. Well, I guess that's the best I can do with my facial equipment. Mirror, mirror on the wall. Eh. What else about her? Well, I don't know what else. She paid board, kept to herself, was no trouble, didn't talk, except her, how do you do, and a very well thank you. Nice table manners. Broke her bread and never left much crumbs. Nice girl. What about boyfriends? None here in my establishment, all ladies. What happens in the street, I wouldn't know. Help me with my coat, will you, Danny? You going someplace? Well, sure I am. I want to look at Elmer's room. First land and door on your right. You want to talk to me soon again, Danny? Maybe, after I look at Elmer's room. I'll be easy to find. Your place, your morgue.  Somebody's got to cry for her. And watch her leave for a session of weeping through mascara eyelashes. The past time, the protest against her being bitter and lonely and unwanted. And into the dead woman's room, search it, note its primness, handle the modest belongings of a girl who had washed, dusted, arranged the belongings of other women in other richer rooms. The pile of old magazines carefully saved on the closet shelf. You can't stand the new ones. The fan magazines, the romances, truer than her own because they were printed on slick paper. The dresser, lined with the thin layer of inexpensive underclothes. The wardrobe with the bargain flowered prints. The starched maids uniformed the cloth coat in the moth-proofed bag. And that was it, the sum of Elmer Russell's life. And then back to headquarters and the concern of Sergeant Geno Tortaglia for your tiredness, for your paleness. Danny, not that it is mine to meddle, but, well, you should exhibit yourself to the sunshine more. Low on far rock away on your day off. Geno. Bring cheeks of tan to your cheeks. Bare your pale feet to the vitamin-filled rays of... My pale feet bother you? Nothing whatsoever about your personality bothers me, Danny. It's only that... I know, Geno. You'd feel better if I got sunburned. Well, it is the fashion of the season. There's a rumor murder is the fashion. Yeah, this also. Three, the members of the opposite sex. It would be so simple. If only somewhere I could find where their lives had been touched by one man, by one killer. Danny, don't whip yourself. I put the boys working on it like, yes, they can't find it either. All they come up with is a reading on a sales slip. Huh? The sales slip you found in the purse of the deceased Elmer Russell. It seems the girl bought a teapot from a place called Ivers, paid $200 for it. And this makes a mishmash upset your colleagues in the department. $200 for a teapot bought by a girl who makes a buck an hour. Doesn't it upset you? Something we can do for you, sir? Yes, there is. I'm from the police. Good. Are we interested in some Chinaware today? Yes, we are. I want you to take a look at this. This is a sales slip. What is it? It's for a teapot, one that costs $200. I don't understand why we're lifting our eyebrows, sir. Of course it did. A strategy teapot on the current market is worth at least that. This sales slip was found on a young lady. A young lady that's been murdered. I see. The young lady happened to have purchased this teapot here. I see. Her name was Elmer Russell. I see. How does a dollar an hour made buy a $200 piece of China? By paying $200 for it. Miss Russell paid exactly that much. Then you remember Miss Russell? Oh, indeed, yes. We sold it to her ourselves about three weeks ago. I remember the transaction well. She'd called the day before to price the teapot. The next day she came in with the money about midday on a Thursday. Unless it was a day off, she was in uniform. Didn't it seem strange that a house made it? Yes, it did. I might as well tell you. Tell me what? The sales slip says $200. She didn't pay that for it. She paid $194 to tax included. We paid the difference out of our own pocket. In the trade we are known as a sucker for hard luck stories about teapots, and Miss Russell had one. You want to tell me about it now or later? Miss Russell was dusting the China at the home of her employer. Broke a stretch of teapot, hid the debris, bought another one before the accent was discovered as a replacement. Just one more thing. Did she say who this employer was? She did not. However, there are some regular clients of ours who eat off the stuff. Like who? The Wellens, for example. The Crandalls, the second and third. The Murrays, the West... Which Murrays? West 11th. The Paul Murrays. Are we being helpful? We'll never know how much. Oh, it's you, Mr. Clover. Please come in. Thanks. Mr. Murray... You want to talk to me, don't you? This way down the hall. Oh, Claudia. That is Cissus practicing. We don't want to disturb her through this door. In here, the library. Now...   Yes? A paranoid. A paranoid? A person who's quick to find a reason to kill, and he doesn't need much of a reason. Just cross him... A crazy man? You could say that. Well, they tell me a lot of crazies are clever. But why come to tell me about it? You should be out looking for the man. I just thought I'd stop by and let you know how we were progressing. I'm busy. Oh? My hobby, model trains. I was assembling this engine. It's a diesel. Careful work. Must take a lot of patience. Please put it down. It's fragile. I don't allow anyone to touch it. All right. I said I stopped by to let you know how we were progressing. Come back when you can tell me the killer's name. And from what I've been reading, you'd better hurry up three killings indiscriminately by the same man. By the same man. The way we figured, Mr. Murray, is that the killer was really only interested in killing one person. He killed the other two to make it look like what you said, indiscriminate killings. I don't understand. To make it look like murder without a motive, without plan. But there was motive. What motive for killing a 14-year-old girl? None. Part of the plan. And that housemaid? None. But that was the killer's mistake. If he'd killed someone else, I wouldn't be here now. You... You don't know what you're talking about. Aren't you going to ask me why anyone should kill your wife? There was no motive. Like the others. The killer had one. He had a wife. A wife who didn't want the burden of an afflicted sister-in-law. That's only a guess. Did your wife ever complain about your sister? Get out of here.  She wanted children, didn't she? Your presumptuous, your crude. Get out of here.  Sis, your sister. You never let her be anything but a child. I don't have to take these insults and put that down. Put that train down. You're crazy. Crazy you broke it deliberately. All that work and you...   For a broken toy train.  That's how you're going to convince me.  Cop an insanity plea. You're going to try harder than that. That's right. Settle down. Took my train. Cut it out, Marty.  That 14-year-old girl.  She'll find out what happened. We'll let her know. Oh, it's so hot in here. The most somest mile in the world. Broadway. My Beat. Broadway's My Beat stars Larry Thoras, detective Danny Clover, with Charles Calvert as Tertaglia, and Jack Krushan as Muggevin. The program was produced and directed by Elliott Lewis, with musical score composed and conducted by Alexander Courage. In tonight's story, Joseph Kearns was heard as Paul Murray, featured in the cast were Charles Davis, Martha Wentworth, and Harry Bartel. Two styles of music, both tops in popularity, are heard every Sunday over most of these same CBS stations. Guy Lombardo's sweetest music, This Side of Heaven, is one. The other is the singing style of Mario Lanza, new vocal sensation of the airwaves. Enjoy Guy Lombardo and his Royal Canadians and the Mario Lanza show tomorrow night. Stay tuned now for us, sing it again, which follows immediately over most of these same CBS stations. Bill Anders speaking. This is CBS, where you meet Adventure with Charlie Wilde on Sundays on the Columbia Broadcasting System.


We're supposed to have McDonald's breakfast a quarterback bar called an audible Mexican buffet breakfast, and it was a delicious first full day to explore we found a Little tour deal that we're gonna go on so I think we've got about an hour to kick it Tyka kept everybody up all night except for me. I slept great. So everybody's all grumpy.  I don't know what the tour goes But two hours. Hopefully we get the best views while we are lazy people So we're doing this in the morning that we can go hike on our foot by night Steer afternoon see what's going happening. So put in baby Tyka seat and it's time to rock I was told Stoney told us the best view in the entire park that you could get to without hiking like a maniac because we're all lazy Oh, dude, would you? Yeah, yeah, say you say you had a seven out of ten Squirrel flying skills. Would you launch seven out of ten? Say you were as good as a Squirrel jumper as you were a powerlifter, right? You know what that means? Yeah That means that I've already been skydiving like over a thousand times Well, and you've already done a billion reps at a deadlift, but it doesn't mean you're the best. Yeah, we're good Yeah, you're not great. You're good. You do it if I was seven out of ten, so yeah, you're launching. I would I would do it I don't know if I did I'm also a pussy. I'm scared of heights. I never do it real life the same Cool story about a lady first woman that white water rat. Yeah. Yeah, let's hear it. Her name was Georgie white Or it is what Georgie white, okay, and she went down this river. You remember I told you it's eights nines Yeah, she took her life jacket with cans and float it down the river twice. What's time period? Do we have a general general 1950s? Yeah, so the temperature is 40 to 50 degrees Now she did that a couple of times and then she got her first inflatable boat from the army It was already rafting companies. She actually blew them away Because she was low budget She would put cans so we merged the cans the thing that why she was low budget They would get barbecues and then canned you wouldn't know what you're getting the spaghettios green beans. Here you go I love spaghetti. Oh, yeah, so so it was really cheap for her to run her tours.  His name was silent Mike. He was alive. He was real He gave everyone such it's real we all look upon him as a star in the sky. He's a rapid machine He keeps his motor clean. He's the coolest man. I've ever seen We'll take it four bars we like it. Yeah, what do you gotta say you gotta say you agree to you was about me It was about me. It's your turn. Yeah. Go. I gotta say something nice about Tony.  I'll get it in the Because I'm always constantly trying to focus on nutrition things one piece is actually my favorite food in two It's the pizza is the food I eat least Because a diet and whatever just because it's hard a lot of fat a lot of carbs But it is my favorite food. So I'm excited. No pineapple on pizza. Don't don't bring that to me Or tonight, that's for two here's two. Yeah me barter friends anymore you eat pineapple on pizza But I mean go to yeah, that's a big difference. That's a big difference. Oh, it is well, but it's just not supposed to be there, you know I mean, you're not supposed to be here, but somehow That's funny. You invited me.   It was actually what eight out of ten seven out of ten Okay, he's mr. Negative Nancy. That's give it like a Seven and a half out of ten pretty decent now. We're gonna grab a football. Hopefully you go chill in this beautiful weather Where we dropping did we got to get Matt's right away. I'm all out of Matt's Mike with jokes that no one understands. Yeah, the whole world Yeah, you're an old dad when it is dead, bro. No No, it's old dude Barson old dad. He doesn't get anymore. That's his issue even Geo got it At least you know it's relevant You don't know about it, but at least you know you're relevant I can't wait. I don't drink that often, but I do Like a good drink here and there we got a little local desert magic IPA When I drink kind of the pans I like some whiskeys and things like that, but typically a beer or wine We're just kicking it dude.  We'll see maybe it's a dinner event.  I'm lazy Cheers


Nancy and I had a sad duty yesterday, but one that also had its proud moments. We traveled to Mayport, Florida to pay tribute to the young men of the USS Stark, 37 of whom were killed last Sunday after an attack on their ship in the Persian Gulf. Yesterday we saw the bravery of the families of these young men. Despite their terrible loss, their courage was a tribute to the valor of their fallen sons and husbands. But as Lincoln noted long ago, at such moments there really are no words. The deeds of our heroes are their own best testimony to their love for our nation and for our people. We can take some comfort, though, in knowing that the Stark's mission was a vital one for us as a free people. Since 1949, American ships have patrolled in the Gulf an area that is a vital, strategic and economic crossroad for the nations of three continents, an area that in the hands of a hostile power would be a choke point of freedom. And that's why we owe the crew of the USS Stark and their brave families such a deep debt of gratitude. It's a debt that should be on all of our minds this Memorial Day weekend, as we recall those who have fallen in our nation's service. In addition to remembering these young men and all the others who struggle and sacrifice protected this nation, we celebrate this weekend another moment when brave men and women work to make our country one nation, indivisible. Only 200 years ago, delegates from seven of the original 13 colonies met in Philadelphia to begin work on forming a new government. It marked the beginning of that famous miracle at Philadelphia, a miracle that brought forth perhaps the most enduring document or instrument, I should say, of human government ever known, our Constitution. Over the years, historical and legal scholars have continued to marvel at its wisdom and prudence. In some mysterious way, it seemed to provide for every contingency. It set up a structure of government strong enough to maintain national unity, but flexible enough to change with the times. One part of our founding father's genius was their provision for amending the Constitution. They knew they had created a good document, but not a perfect one. In fact, even two centuries ago, some of them, especially Thomas Jefferson, were troubled by one omission, the lack of a limitation on public borrowing by the federal government. They knew from firsthand experience how tyranny abused the fiscal powers of government, how excessive borrowing and heavy taxation led to inflated currencies and economic hardship. Well, even in their reservations about the Constitution, the founding fathers were perceptive and wise. I think most of you know how badly out of control federal spending has gotten in recent years. Today, the national debt is two and a quarter trillion dollars. In 1985, the Congress tried to do something about its excessive spending by passing a bill called Graham Rudman Hollings that put deficit spending on a steady decline until we reached a balanced budget in the early 1990s. But lately, Congress has been returning to its old ways and forgetting the solemn promises it made under this law. That's why I'm one of those Americans who has always believed a constitutional amendment mandating that Congress balance the budget is the answer to what ails us. And we've tried to get such an amendment through the Congress so that the state legislatures could vote on it. This reluctance by the Congress has inspired a number of Americans to try another method provided for in the Constitution, a constitutional convention, one with delegates from each state who could propose a balanced budget amendment and then send it on to the state legislatures for approval. Only two more states are needed to call such a convention. And believe me, if the Congress continues to balk at passing the balanced budget amendment, I think the drive for a constitutional convention will pick up steam. So this Memorial Day, as we think of those who paid the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, we should not forget to also reflect on our own duties, to the way of life and the system of government for which they died. Certainly wasting our national wealth and burdening future generations with mountains of debt does not keep faith with those who have struggled and sacrificed to begin a new form of government here on our shores. And I hope you'll do something else as well. Keep especially in mind the brave sailors of the USS Stark.  Until next week, thanks for listening and God bless you.


Hello everyone, welcome back to another session in dentistry and more today's topic is adenoide cystic carcinoma which is the most common neoplasma of submanipular and sublingual gland. So which is also known as cylindroma adenocystic carcinoma or adenocystic basal silk carcinoma. So let's get into details of adenoide cystic carcinoma. So adenoide cystic carcinoma which is a slow growing but aggressive neoplasm with remarkable capacity to recur and profound tendency to invade perineural lymphatic spaces, okay. So this is as I told most common neoplasm of submanipular and sublingual salivary glands and also it is seen in minor salivary glands in the palate. So 50 to 70 percentage of this seen in minor salivary glands the palate is the most common site and it is a third most common malignant neoplasm seen in the salivary gland after mucoepidermoid carcinoma and polymorphous adenocarcinoma. So this is the third most common malignant neoplasm of salivary gland and the most common neoplasm of submanipular and sublingual gland and it is most commonly seen between fifth to seventh decade. Actually there is no gender predilection for this disease this neoplasm and there is a slight female predilection as reported. So in clinical presentation the pain is a common and important finding it is a slow growing mass. Patients often complains of a constant low grade dull ache which gradually increases in intensity. Facial nerve paralysis may develop with parotid tumors. Palatal tumors can be very smooth surface or maybe even ulcerated. Tumors arising in the palate or maxillary soiness it may show radiographic evidence of bone destruction so it may involve the bone maxillary bone and it will distract it. So while moving on to the histopathologic features the adenocarcinoma is basically composed of mixture of myoepithelial cell and ductile like cells that can have a varied arrangement. So there are three basic patterns of the disease that is cribriform type, tubular type and solid type. So cribriform type which is well differentiated and tubular type is moderately differentiated and solid type is undifferentiated type. So you can make out from the picture it is well differentiated moderately differentiated and undifferentiated. So usually a combination at these is seen on the tumories classified based on the predominant pattern. So whichever pattern is seen in the histopathology section. So we will categorize this adenocarcinoma. This is the most classic and best recognized appearance which is characterized by islands of basilar epithelial cells that contain multiple cylindrical cyst-like spaces which is resembling Swiss cheese or honeycomb pattern. So in adenocarcinoma the cribriform type shows Swiss cheese or honeycomb pattern. So this might be asked as a short note Swiss cheese or honeycomb. It is not just seen in adenocarcinoma there are few others in your plasm also. The same pattern is seen. So these spaces often contain a mildly basophilic mucoid material and a hyalinized isonophilic product or a compound mucoid hyalinized appearance is seen. So sometimes the hyalinized material also surround these cribriform hyalins. So it is like a Swiss cheese honeycomb pattern with hyalinized areas. So whereas tubular pattern these are tubular structures that are lined by stratified cuboidal epithelium. So it is lined by stratified cuboidal epithelium. So in the longitudinal section the ductile structures are viewed as ducts or tubules. That's why it got this name tubular pattern. The tubular lumen can be lined by one or more several layers of cells. So that is second pattern our tubular pattern whereas a third pattern solid pattern. tubular pattern is a group of cuboidal cells with little tendency towards ducts or cis formation. There is no ducts or cis formation. Instead it is arranged in nests or sheets of varying size and shape and you can see areas of necrosis between there is no tubular pattern it is necrosis may be seen. It is arranged in nests or sheets of varying size and shape and there are cellular pleomorphism and mitosis also observed. So that is solid pattern and now we have the treatment options and prognosis treatment mostly the surgical excision is opted and also associated along with x-ray radiation. Radiation alone is not recommended it is going hand in hand with surgery and cure it is basically low minor gland tumor is more deadlier than the major gland tumors so the palatal tumors will be more deadlier with less prognosis rate. So that's all about adenoid cystic carcinoma. So we have to learn carcinoma that is mucoepidoma and carcinoma. So similarly adenoid cystic carcinoma also important shot not it is frequently asked one. So these are the neoplasm malignant neoplasm which is seen in adenoid that is the salivary or the gland like structure. So we have seen adenoma toid or endogenic tumor the gland like so from the name we get this idea the gland cystic cyst formation in the glands and the carcinoma ok. So which is also known as cylindroma adenoid cystic carcinoma or adeno cystic basal cell carcinoma. So I will come up with another topic in the industry and more thank you.


Psych2Go is a digital media organization that raises mental health awareness by presenting psychological topics in a digestible and relatable manner. Please, share our content with those who need it. Do you know or suspect anyone of struggling with depression? Is it a family member or close friend? If so, if you're not sure how to confront them without making things worse, we've made this video on things to avoid saying when talking to someone with depression. We hope you find it helpful. If you do, please share it. We thank you for your support. Sometimes, a well-intentioned remark can be misconceived as something hurtful or ignorant. So it's very important that you know how to be careful with your words. Here are five things you should never say to someone who's depressed. 1. You're not trying hard enough. No, some of you might feel that this one is pretty obvious, but a lot of people are actually guilty of saying this to someone with depression.  You may believe that happiness is a choice, but depression most definitely is not. Sometimes, it's because of things that are out of a person's control, like their genetics, traumatic experiences, or a chemical imbalance in their brains. So be sure not to make them feel as if you blame them for any of it. 2. It's all in your head. This is another common mistake a lot of people make when they try to comfort someone with depression. Though we might not see it, mental illness is just as real and serious as any physical illness. Sometimes even more so because of all the stigma surrounding it. In fact, a book titled Depression, The Misunderstood Illness, written by Dr. Leslie Lim in 2008, shows that depression is the most misunderstood mental illness of them all. Depression is different from the occasional bout of sadness you might feel during times of hardship. It's not just as simple as going through the normal ups and downs of life. People struggling with depression often find it hard to get out of bed, eat, sleep, or do anything worthwhile. So you shouldn't tell them that they're simply overreacting or making a big deal out of nothing. 3. You have nothing to be depressed about. Another common misconception most people have on depression is that there is a specific cause for it. In truth, according to a 1998 study by Ingram Miranda and Segal, anyone can have depression, no matter how popular, wealthy, or accomplished. When you tell someone with depression that they shouldn't be depressed because they have no reason to be, you may come off as insensitive and unsympathetic. Though your intention may be to remind them of all the blessings they have in their life and all the reasons they have to be happy, it's not a good way of going about it. Instead, you're making them feel like they're ungrateful. 4. You seem fine to me. You don't seem depressed to me, or you look pretty okay to me, may sound like a compliment to you. But to someone who's depressed, it may seem as if you're invalidating their feelings and struggles. Saying this will make the person feel bad for confiding in you in the first place. It can erode their trust in you, and make them more guarded instead of more open. 5. I know how you feel. When you say this, you're most likely trying to convey sympathy and understanding. However, to people who are depressed, it may feel disingenuous or offensive. Unless you've ever been diagnosed with clinical depression by a licensed professional, you don't actually know how the other person feels or what they're going through. Don't offer them advice that trivializes their struggles. Depression can't be cured with just a bit of exercise or sleep, a cup of chamomile tea, or some new friends and hobbies. It takes a lot of dedication, hard work, resilience, and inner strength. Let us know in the comments below if you have someone in your life who's depressed, and you want to be there for them. Offer them a hug or a shoulder to cry on. Help them see that there is hope and that things can get better. Let them know you care about them and that they're not alone in this. You might not completely understand or know what to say, but it means a lot to them to know that you care. If you know someone who may benefit from online counseling, we actually partnered up with Better Help, an affordable online counseling platform that you could utilize. They're constantly striving to improve their services and terms and conditions. The link will be in the description box below. What do you think of these points so far? Did we miss anything? Let us know in the comments below. And please subscribe to Psych2Go for more psychology content. Don't forget to like and share this video with someone who might be able to benefit from it. And as always, thanks so much for watching.


Hello everyone. Welcome to our pre-owned vehicles of the week. I'm Gabrielle and I'm over here at Oxmore Toyota. Now this week we are going to be featuring three certified pre-owned Toyotas.  Why don't we go ahead and start with this forerunner right here. So the first vehicle is a 2021 Toyota forerunner TRD Pro. That exterior color is in the magnetic gray metallic. It is four-wheel drive. Now you are going to have those alloy wheels. There's going to be navigation, sunroof. You'll have bluetooth, heated leather seating. There's the eight-way power driver seat with lumbar support. There is also going to be a clean car fax. Now that interior is in a black. The mileage on there is 29,347 and the price is $62,995. Our second vehicle is a 2022 Toyota Highlander XLE. That exterior color is in a silver. Now this vehicle is going to have alloy wheels. You're going to have blind spot monitoring, a sunroof, bluetooth. There's a clean car fax. You'll have a power liftgate and heated leather seating. That interior is in a black. Now the mileage is $20,515. The price is $45,995. Our last vehicle is a 2021 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE Premium. That exterior color is in a blizzard pearl. This is all-wheel drive.  There's going to be a sunroof, bluetooth, clean car fax. There's a power liftgate. Now you're going to get 38 miles per gallon on the highway, 41 for the city. That interior is in a black soft text. The mileage is $29,096. The price is $43,995. All right now if you all have any questions on any one of these three certified Toyotas feel free to let us know. All of our contact info is listed right here. Again with that certification is the seven-year 100,000 mile limited powertrain warranty. All right guys, we'll see you soon. Bye.