What's good Josh what Ross back again with another video? So I know we weren't able to do a live stream reaction For you guys tonight for Monday Night Raw, but we're definitely gonna be checking out I think we're gonna check out NXT this week and most likely we'll check out Friday night smack now So be on a lookout for that But I was able to check out some of the clips some of the major Story points for this episode of Monday Night Raw and they started off raw with a Great promo from Sami Zayn even Sami Zayn and Kevin Owens was out there to start off raw to pretty much address Roman Reigns and solo going for the tag team titles at night of champions And it was one of those things where Sami was was heated like I love that Kevin Owens really didn't say much. He didn't have to say much Sami was like Man, like it's it's not enough that you're WWE champion It's not enough that you're the Universal champion It's not enough that you've had the title for over a thousand days coming up to coast over a thousand days It's not enough You just had to come for us You have to come for these titles and I love the intensity was bringing the crowd was into it He was like you're not getting these Roman Roman get not getting these titles At the end of the day, you've cheated majority of your title reign to even retain the title I like that he brought that up. He brought up that Kevin Owens should have won He brought up that he should have won when he faced Roman He's brought up how he's single-handedly by himself destroying the bloodline from within They wanted to only just destroy the bloodline, but seems like Roman is doing it himself They brought all that up and they let him know We finally get to get revenge on you We didn't think this was gonna happen, but we finally get to get revenge on you and that's what we're gonna do You're not taking these titles from us. We're not letting you take these titles from us and ah Man, that was great Sammy really killed that promo even though Kevin Owens was out there. He was just chilling Sammy had that fire. The crowd was hyped. This is why Sammy is in the position He's in now and I am really looking forward to seeing that match Because I think that match could potentially be match of the night could still the show And it's gonna be the main event and once again Once again, it's just cool to be able to see that the tag team title once again It's gonna main event a pay-per-view and may close out the show in a great way So I'm looking forward to that But the judgment day comes out and this is and I want to make a notice this crowd tonight They were on it and they didn't have to pipe in crowdchains for at least for this segment They were on it judgment day comes out What not and pretty much Finn Balor's like yeah, you know, I could have sworn last week I was done with the bloodline But now y'all back to square one and Damian Priest was like yeah But I was probably gonna take care of y'all or what not, you know, I don't think y'all gonna win But you know Finn Balor's like but if you do win The line starts with us as in they want shots at the tag team titles Which I would not have a problem with then Rhea starts to talk and the crowd Goes crazy Rhea.  She's starting to get the mommy chance Wow, like she soon she started talking crowd went crazy for her Crowd went crazy. She basically let them know and in case you didn't forget judgment day runs Monday Night Raw as We expected whatever. All right, cool. And then I Like what Kevin Owens did here Kevin Owens. Well, no, it wasn't Kevin Owens It was it was I believe it was Sammy's aim.  He was booed out the building. I mean booed They were booing him every time he picked up the mic You barely could hear and I like that they at that in part of the promo because Kevin Owens like yo I can't hear you. I don't understand what you're saying. I can't hear you.  And a big brawl ensues and I like that and I think they're gonna start going with that gimmick of Every city he goes to depending on the type of crowd they have Every city he goes to it should be hard for him to talk because the crowd is going to boo him It's now part of his gimmick like the crowd doesn't like you so much. You can't say a word I love that it gets the crowd interacting with the wrestler and it's it's always a good fun time to boo Dominic So great opening segment love the promo that Sammy was talking that talk like Roman We're gonna take care of you you're not taking these titles from us And you're gonna receive the beats at night of champion. So that should be an interesting one Hopefully that that does happen, but that's how they started off the show. I believe there was like a battle royal for it to see Who would be the number one contender for a goon thirst intercontinental championship? Let's stop Ali. We know why they did it now It makes sense why he's won like two weeks in a row because they're going over to Saudi we Okay, he's not winning but You know saying like I cool What ifs we got to talk about Cody's promo Cody promo he comes out Great ovation fans love him or what not and he tells the story of the the the frog and The the scorpion and basically, you know the scorpion is to get to cross this river Frogs are I ain't gonna take you because you don't see me and then the scorpion like I'm gonna see you He gets halfway across the river with the scorpion on his back Obviously the scorpion sings him frog is like why he's like scorpion's like it's in my nature my bad, bro You know I'm saying but it was you know, it was a nice nice little tale to compare him to you know the to compare himself as the frog and Brock Lesnar as the scorpion and that's it.  I'm sorry And I think you're coming after me.  It's my time. So do me a favor Get out of my way So I hope they at some point announced some type of stipulation. They're supposed to be having a Face-off next week on wrong. They gotta have a stipulation. I do not want to see this match as a regular match, bro I don't I don't care. No Mega the stipulation Mega the stipulation it helps Cody in a sense, you know, storyline wise make it a stipulation something because I Honestly, if I'm if I'm WWE, you gotta have this you gotta have Cody Have to have him This is a situation you gotta have him win because it's no point of tying it up with him and Brock to in this view Have him beat Brock twice because it's not that many people that have done that Consecutively beating them back-to-back paper views to really drive home. Cody is the goddamn guy. Okay. All right, cool It was okay promo fact promo segment. I definitely still enjoyed the Usos I'm not usos Sammy's ain't Kevin Owens mainly cuz Sammy came out there with that intent intensity And I was really hoping that Cody would match it just a little bit more, but he's more like He's more of the methodical intensity, which I appreciate his promos But I really would have loved for him to just really dig in the Brock Like, you know, the dude attacked me again from behind as I already beat him What more do you want from me as the infamous tire Tyrese meme? So but definitely enjoyable. We'll see what they do next week. Um, and then we got to talk about the end of the show so I believe the Judgment day ended up having a match with Sammy Zane and Members of the judgment day end up having a match with Sammy Zane and Kevin Owens I believe it was Finn Balor and Damien Priest or whatnot and Pretty much, you knew there was gonna be some shenanigans at it, too. Now for the previous week, I believe Kevin Owens and Sammy Zane had a match with the members of Imperium or whatnot and And they ended up losing so it it kind of made sense that they would kind of get involved in this match And they pretty much Imperium with Walter out there Now Walter go through out there Sammy and Kevin Owens to lose this match to Damien Priest and Finn Balor, which was a very It made sense storyline wise they beat the tag champs, which is kind of crazy But the tag champs lost due to outside interference They were kind of pretty much outnumbered and you can see Paul Heyman up at the front with the red iPhone You can in sing wedding. He's talking to Roman pulling the strings there You know, they got involved in that match or whatnot. You also know that you know Judgment day. They I don't know if they still have a little mini alliance with With the bloodline but all this they're just talking to Roman you kind of pulling the strings a little bit It's gonna be very interesting to see how this plays out because it's one of those things where you know Sammy and Kevin they're they're going against some some crazy odds because you know Roman's gonna do whatever he can to get those titles off of them But I do think the Usos are gonna be the reason that does not happen But hey overall from the segment that I did see it was pretty cool pretty enjoyable y'all let me know Did you guys enjoy a raw tonight? What you rate wrong a scale to one to ten, man? Let me know what was the the match or the segment that you enjoyed the most What match are you looking forward to the most going in to night of champions? But I appreciate all love and sport you guys shine on channel road to 150k and I'm singing speedy youtubers and champion world Appreciate y'all kicking me see you next one. Peace


Hello again committee for the record bring here from Legislative Council If I understand why I'm here is to follow up on the testimony you heard last week from some people including the ACLU on a few different cases and what their implications are for our current fair and impartial policing statute Am I right about that generally? I mean there were two questions, and I'm not sure who's clearly Put to you or not The one question was just kind of basically understands 1373 and how Southern district of New York Presumably has said the second circuit Opinion is no longer valid given the Supreme Court case in other words. Why is 1373? Unconstitutional at least as followed by some courts. Okay, the second pride question is To answer so what you know if that doesn't matter for us as far as whether we Based on the southern district of New York case can say well, that's no longer the law We don't have to follow 1373 if that makes sense. Yeah, what's the argument that essentially probably going to repeat tomorrow? Why that's not enough for us to just ignore what 1373? If that's the case I think so So Yes, there was a and as Leah testified there was a Southern district of New York case That came down very recently at the end of November That found that because of the United States Supreme Court decision in Murphy versus in CWA The prior precedent of the second circuit could not survive after Murphy was handed down So I can't remember how much she spoke about the murky case this was a Decision that turned on the anti commanding commandeering doctrine and the 10th amendment of the Constitution a little bit of history is that New Jersey repealed its anti sports gambling statute in 2014 and That law was or that That law was challenged by the professional sports leagues and in CWA New Jersey lost that case in the district court and in the third circuit But the Supreme Court granted certiorari and addressed the question of whether a federal statute that prohibits modification or repeal of State law prohibitions on private conduct impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of states This has to do with the federal regulation that prohibits sports betting so the question was in the murky case Whether a federal statute prohibits modification or repeal of a state law prohibition on private conduct impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of the state So does that with that infringe upon the anti commandeering doctrine and the 10th amendment so in that case the court ruled in favor of New Jersey and found that The federal prohibition on sports betting was an unconstitutional violation of the anti commandeering doctrine and specifically it says that because because murphy turned on Murphy really distinguished between an invalid federal measure that that seek to impress state government into the administration of a federal program as Distinguished from a valid federal measure that prohibits states from compelling passive resistance to particular federal programs so Essentially what this the recent Southern District of New York case said is that the former second circuit case can't survive murphy Because murphy said it doesn't matter whether Congress is seeking to command states To do some affirmative action or impose some prohibition The basic principle is that Congress can't issue direct orders to state legislators Regardless of whether or not they're issuing a direct command or whether they're prohibiting state legislators from undertaking something Okay, and I can talk to you about a little bit about the anti commandeering clause the reasons for it the rationale for it That's murphy talks a lot about this They say that It's based on sovereign authority the way that our federal government is established It impinges upon citizens liberty to be governed by their preferred state and local policies Underbinds political accountability So it's difficult for citizens to distinguish between federal and state immigration policy There's no credit or blame Proper credit or blame on state or local officials when state or local officials actions are orchestrated by the federal government And it also shifts a portion of the cost of immigration enforcement to the states and by forcing states to allow employees to participate in the federal regulatory scheme, so The anti commandeering doctrine provides that the the Congress can't Shift a portion of the cost of their policies to the states because then they are not required to do the cost-benefit analysis of their own legislation and also Take the consequences of their own legislation if it turns out to be Unpopular or not to work very well So that's sort of the purpose of the anti commandeering doctrine and with the southern district of New York said was after murphy That's second circuit precedent is no longer good law. They have to follow the outcome of the US Supreme Court And so to get to your the second part of the question about so what does that matter? I would say that You know that case the southern district of New York case they are within our circuit so There it's not a higher court than the Vermont district court But it is the same jurisdiction so it certainly does not impose any mandatory Authority to the Vermont district court But I think it is persuasive authority. I think it's relevant authority District courts tend to look at the decisions of other district courts within their circuit to find out what the other district courts are doing But again, it does not It is not binding authority on our court So I think it's a relevant decision to look at But I don't think it necessarily means that for our purposes That federal statute is unconstitutional because it's not a court with jurisdiction over them So Does this mean I mean three have to have either the second circuit Or the Vermont district court explicitly saying that 1373 Is unconstitutional under whatever doctrine presumably following the southern district of New York and the anti-commandeering doctor Do we do we need them to go that far for us to say? Well, let me put it a little bit differently, I'm sorry Do we have to follow the law of the Vermont district courts interpretation then the circuit second circuit? Interpretation of federal law as the law that binds us. I think generally yes But I don't I'm not saying that you can't do what you like with With our fair and impartial policing statute But I think typically you can look to You know when as as lawyers were taught to look to your Look to the jurisprudence that is within your jurisdiction First you look to What is from a higher court? Within your jurisdiction because that's considered Binding authority, but if there is nothing that's from a higher court, you can look into the you can look at The same jurisdiction, but not necessarily a higher court as being relevant or persuasive authority I think that's a question About whether it is or not because of its age and the relevant supreme court decisions that have been handed down since it was decided It's related to Martin's question, but so we don't I mean what I'm partly hearing is we don't have Clear direction from a higher court Directly is handed down to us But can you talk more about what meet what persuasive and relevant authority means? I mean does that mean that if we were to? Either produce legislation or an after policy some other means at the state level that That we would that we just have legal grounds then to Argument that 1373 is Yeah, I mean I think I was speaking mostly in terms of what the court will use like it It's a Vermont district court were to consider this issue. I think that they would look to the southern district case as relevant Persuasive authority because it's another court that is in their jurisdiction within the second circuit But I also think that I can't think of an example off the top of my head right now But I think that this the legislature Creates policy based on Non-binding court cases all the time Based on its judgment about whether or not That policy would be considered unconstitutional And I can I can think about some examples and get back to you following up on that so other examples were In a finding section that we have Said that we this is the way we see the law as it stands now because of the Supreme Court opinion and such are we To explain why we're taking this step if in fact we go beyond our past interpretation of 1373 No I cannot look at one, but it sounds like something we have done before and I would be glad to look into This is why we are yes, I think that you couldn't I mean I think it is common practice to put something in legislative intent about About a court decision and that being the policy rationale behind the legislation I know that specifically we're doing because of a case from our I can think of the third-party rule when the when that electronic privacy bill passed it was sort of directly Taking action based on a decision that came down That ruled on the third-party rule. So that's one example. I can think of I don't think it's directly on point here because that was a Decision that had a pretty clear ruling But I can all look into it I had a question. So just more so about procedure if If a court case were to arise would the state itself be the plaintiff bringing in action against the federal government or how would that? Yes, I believe so So that's it could presumably be we're not giving us grant money because they're saying we're violating 1373 Yeah, it's related to Martin's question That could happen at the level of the state, but if the municipality lost funding then that would have to be kind of like the city of Mobile yarns. Yes, right. Yeah Yeah, because that would be the one you would have standing So if there were this Sort of scenario where the municipality or the state of Vermont were bringing it would it be for in financial terms? I'm just trying to think of what would be the remedy sought Right. So if funding was denied It would likely be a reinstatement of funding That would otherwise be Oh to the state under federal law or the state would otherwise be entitled to Right, and then you get to the whole situation of how much does it cost to bring a suit and what is the potential remedy in that balance? I suppose the attorney general now that's yes taking to account. Yes As they always do Is there a Any for fair and impartial policing? I know we can't say if there's something you can't name anybody But I have begun a committee bill. Okay. I thought that that would be the avenue that you would want to take So it would seem to me, I don't know if the committee agrees that whether we should Okay, great. Thank you Yeah, I was gonna say if you can get hold of them Chief and maybe even come up a little early Like maybe like quarter after


Appalachian Wireless and Samsung have VBL and Wireless all January. Samsung Galaxy S9 just a penny. Galaxy S9 plus $99.99. Note 9 just $249.99. That's $200 off normal pricing. While supplies last, two-year agreement requires eStore for details. January is halfway over and many people are already struggling with their New Year's resolutions. One of the most popular resolutions every year has to do with weight loss and fitness, and many stories are very similar. I was 30 years old and 325 pounds, and I just decided I wanted to get healthy, I wanted to look better, I wanted to feel better, I wanted to live longer. Michael Pinson says his weight loss journey started nearly 10 years ago, but was much more than just a New Year's resolution. You definitely have to change your lifestyle. You have to eat better, you have to exercise, and exercise alone and losing some weight will make you feel better, and then that pushes you to keep going. And many people find success keeping those resolutions by sticking together. If it wasn't for group fitness, I don't think I would have succeeded like I have. But Michael Pinson took those group classes to the next level. After the first year that I took ripped classes, I became an instructor. And just a couple of months ago, Michael's story put him on a plane to Los Angeles. Tina and Terry Shorter, the founders of Rip, called me and asked me if I would be a part of their transformation edition. They have themes for each one of their seasons they come out with, and they wanted to do a major weight loss transformation edition. Michael hopes to continue to show others facing similar struggles that fitness and weight loss goals are possible to achieve. Well, I post my story often. I post a lot of pictures, I know. But I do that to inspire someone else to get up and to get moving and to feel better about their self.


So, for months now Donald Trump has been ranting about the danger that mail-in voting poses to our democracy, because according to him, if we allow widespread mail-in voting, that will make our election susceptible to fraud and abuse. It doesn't matter to him that the facts don't match the rhetoric that he's using. It doesn't matter to him that the fraud rate for mail-in voting is literally less than 0%. To him, he knows that with how poorly he's polling against Joe Biden, the only way he's going to be able to win is if he suppresses enough votes. And that really is true for every single election. Republicans know that they are much more likely to do well if turnout is low, and so they try to suppress as many votes as they possibly can and cross their fingers and hope that that was enough. Now, with Donald Trump, he was really hoping that this pandemic would be a sort of natural vote suppressor, because if people are logical and they don't want to come out to vote in person and risk their own lives or expose others to this really deadly contagious virus, they just stay home, which is perfect for him. But during a pandemic, of course, mail-in voting is a logical solution to this problem. Now it's not just something that we need during a pandemic. I think that mail-in voting is one way to strengthen democracy and actually increase turnout. But to him, this is all about winning. It's all about him. Now, we know that he's going to continue to fear monger about mail-in voting. We know he's going to attempt to delegitimize mail-in voting. But the lengths that he's going to sound the alarm about mail-in voting and delegitimize it are now reaching new levels. Like we are talking about really scary territory to where if he could, I have no doubt in my mind he would be a dictator. Because he tweeted this out last week with universal mail-in voting, not absentee voting, which is good, 2020 will be the most inaccurate and fraudulent election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. May the election, until people can properly, securely and safely vote, think about what we just read. The sitting president of the United States just floated postponing an election because of some type of manufactured crisis he's trying to create. This is exactly what they do in authoritarian regimes. In fact, our country condemns other regimes with leaders who postpone elections. Not the day after Donald Trump made this tweet, his own administration condemned Hong Kong for postponing their legislative elections. So it's okay for him to float postponing an election because of some bogus reason, but when other countries do it, this would be enough for us to invade that country to bring democracy to them. Maybe the United States should invade itself because now we are very clearly entering dangerous territory here. And the good news is that Donald Trump doesn't actually have the legal authority to do that. But I mean it's still dangerous and so much so that this may have been a line that he crossed even with right wingers because most of the conservative subreddit was even against him. Not necessarily because they're worried that he would be a dictator, but because I mean just generally speaking, electorally speaking, this is a terrible strategy. It's making him look bad. It shows that he's worried. But I mean, this really is a new low. He genuinely would be a dictator if he were able to do that. That's what he wants. Protect his own reelection campaign at all costs, even if democracy is hurt by his actions. And ironically, he's claiming that mail-in voting is going to lead to democracy being illegitimate. But no, what he's doing currently is hurting democracy. Make no mistake about it. He's not worried that mail-in voting is going to hurt democracy. He's worried that mail-in voting is going to increase the fairness of this election and bolden and strengthen our democracy. And according to him, what's funny is that the people who are trying to offer mail-in voting as an alternative during a pandemic, they're the ones who are actually attacking democracy, ironically. He's making the case that if you are for mail-in voting, if you're giving people an extra option to vote, you're the one who's trying to hurt democracy. It's insane. So the state of Nevada, their democratically elected legislature, passed a law allowing their citizens to vote by mail. And his response is very telling, because he's threatening legal action against them. So RNC Chairwoman Ron McDaniel tweeted this out. Trump supporters are out in force today protesting Nevada Dems' attempts to ramp through mass mail-in voting and ballot harvesting. Republicans want to use the pandemic to destroy election integrity. That is projection right there. Trump then responded to that saying in an illegal late night coup, Nevada's clubhouse governor made it impossible for Republicans to win the state. Post office could never handle the traffic of mail-in votes without preparation, using COVID to steal the state. See you in court. This is like a true mask off moment for Donald Trump. First of all, he's inadvertently admitting that when more people come out to vote, Republicans lose elections. So who is it again that is worried about democracy? Now second of all, the language that he's using here after he floated the possibility of postponing the election is illegal late night coup. So you postponing the election over a manufactured crisis, that's not a coup attempt. But expanding people's ability to vote by mail, that is tantamount to a coup to Donald Trump. Unbelievable. Now what he said there at the end is truly telling. He says the post office could never handle the traffic of mail-in votes without preparation. Theoretically speaking, if you are genuinely worried about mail-in voting, what would you do as someone in a position of power? Ideally, you'd want to give them more resources, make sure they are capable of doing adequate delivery of mail during an election where we have a record number of people voting by mail. But instead, he's doing the opposite. Because if we're not going to buy into his lies about it leading to fraud, then the way he's going to stop mail-in voting is to just completely cripple the US Postal Service. And to do just that, to carry out this agenda, he put one of his friends who donated to his campaign in charge of the US Postal Service who's doing just that. So this headline from the New York Times, really it says it all. Mail delays fuel concern Trump's undercutting postal system ahead of voting. The President's long campaign against the Postal Service is intersecting with his assault on mail-in voting amid concerns that he has politicized oversight of the agency. By the article goes on to explain, President Trump's year-long assault on the Postal Service and his increasingly dire warnings about the dangers of voting by mail are colliding as the presidential campaign enters its final months. The result has been to generate new concerns about how he could influence an election conducted during a pandemic in which greater than ever numbers of voters will submit their ballots by mail. In recent weeks at the direction of a Trump campaign mega donor who was recently named the Postmaster General, the service has stopped paying mail carriers and clerks the overtime necessary to ensure that deliveries can be completed each day. That and other changes have led to reports of letters and packages being delayed by as many as several days. Voting rights groups say it is a recipe for disaster. Quote, we have an underfunded state and local election system and a deliberate slowdown in the Postal Service, said Wendy Fields, the executive director of the Democracy Initiative, a coalition of voting and civil rights groups. She said the president was deliberately orchestrating suppression and using the post office as a tool to do it. Kim Wyman, the Republican Secretary of State in Washington, one of five states where mail-in balloting is universal, said Wednesday on NPR's 1A program that election officials are very concerned if the post office is reducing service that we will be able to get ballots to people in time. So if he can't delegitimize mail-in voting because we won't believe his lie about it being fraudulent or leading to fraud, he's going to delegitimize mail-in voting by letting all of us know that if we are going to vote by mail or planning to vote by mail, that maybe our vote won't be counted in time or maybe our ballot won't get to us in time. This is outright sabotage of the election. If he knows that mail-in voting is going to be the main way that people are going to be casting their votes in the 2020 election and he's going to sabotage that system, which is going to make mail-in voting effective or a possibility at all, he's basically fixing the selection for himself. Because again, if he suppresses more votes, that's better for him. So let's look at how many people might want to vote by mail. In Kentucky, based on their June primary, mail-in ballots accounted for 85% of total votes. I repeat, the overwhelming majority of people in a red state like Kentucky voted by mail when it comes to the state of Vermont. Requests for mail-in ballots increased by 1,000% in Michigan. There's been 1.8 million requests for mail-in ballots compared to 500,000 requests in 2016. So think about this. If as many people as we're expecting want to vote by mail and they are not able to, this election might actually be illegitimate because of Donald Trump, this is outright sabotage and there should be consequences for this, legal consequences for this. Donald Trump should be sued. This is unacceptable. This should terrify every single person who cares about democracy. Donald Trump is a tyrant. He would be an outright autocrat, a dictator, a literal dictator if he could. But in wherever he's able to make a difference and kill democracy, that's what he's trying to do. And he's manufacturing this crisis and he's complaining that it is the people who advocate for mail-in voting who are truly trying to hurt democracy. This should scare everyone. And you have to be prepared during this election. If you get your ballot early, cast it immediately. Don't wait. Take precautions. Make sure you're tracking your ballot. If you have that ability in your state, understand that this isn't a normal election. This is the first election that we're all living through. We're voting during a pandemic. So take precautions and understand what's at stake here. Trump is quite literally trying to rig the election before our very eyes. And the sad thing is he might actually be successful and there might not be anything that we can do about it. We just have to sit back and watch in horror as this wannabe dictator tries to stack the deck in his favor because he knows he's gonna lose unless he suppresses the vote. This is nauseating.


Good morning or I guess afternoon. Yeah, how we doing? Hi. Yeah. Yeah, it's all good Yeah, thank you No, those those kind of things are always nice, you know and You know they come after wins, which is ultimately what's important and hopefully we can keep that moving Keep that going for us moving forward You know Yeah, I think you know each each week requires, you know a Different effort and you know a different plan And we've been better, you know in some weeks than others, but through eight games We found our way to four wins and got the job done four times So hopefully we can improve that, you know as as we move forward, but I think you know as far as finding our identity I think we're still working on it, you know, we're still chipping away trying to improve in certain areas and get better in certain spots But you know while you're doing that you got to find ways to win and we've done a decent job of that so far You know Yeah, for sure, you know, I think you talk about what CP has done in the first, you know Half of the season he's played well Kyle's done a good job. He continues to improve and get better week to week for us you know, but we're at our best when everybody's getting involved and You know, you're finding ways to get different guys, you know going in the run game get Mike going in the run game You know and in the past game spreading the ball around making it difficult on defenses to Key in on on what you're trying to do. And so, you know, I think our guys will continue to step up I thought Russ did a nice job for us last week, you know a couple of key catches and starting to get his legs back under of them after having been out for a little bit so Guys like that Tajik Sharpe, Alameda Zakiya. So Zee had a great game for us last week Different guys are going to step up at different times for us throughout the year I mean listen, I love Dan and you know, he's he's an awesome person. He's great coach. I had I Really enjoyed playing for him and so You know wish him nothing the best, but he knows what this week is about for both of us is about trying to get a win And he's he's an incredible competitor. So once we're playing. It's it's about going against their defense and And I'm sure Q will be locked in the same way I don't know about massively differently, you know, I think every every years, you know You evolve and you feature the players that you have differently and I think he's done a nice job of You know using the guys that they have there in Dallas and and trying to you know emphasize their strengths and allowing them to play fast and You know physical and fly around I think you know, he's done a their defense has played really well this year I think he's done a great job You kind of go back to I mean it's impossible to pick one You know Dan, I mean he's a he's a he's a great friend and You know a guy that I have a ton of respect for so it's impossible to pick one, but there's so many times I mean, he's he's for the people who were here and got to know him There's he's as good of a person as you're gonna find and so Like I said, you know, I don't have one that I can pull from I've got tons and he's just a great person Yeah, yeah, yeah Text him in the middle of the season. He's always asking about how my kids are doing and stuff like that. So He and Stacy are great people and yeah, he's he's kept in touch and I've kept in touch Yeah, you know, I think You know, I have to think about it for a second. He's put me on the spot, but You know, I think with each coordinator what what they ask you to do or what they emphasize from you might be a little bit different and You know, I've always felt like You know, you've got to find the way that your game fits into, you know, what they're trying to do And you know, I feel like my skill set is you know has been productive with a lot of different people and You know, you try and you try and tweak things here and there But I'm always, you know, always trying to group things in my brain in similar ways You know to try and keep my feet my footwork Whether it be different play action past concepts that he has and things that I have not done You know, I try and group them in specific things so I can get myself Feeling like it's something that I know or feeling like it's something that you know, I've done at a certain point in my career but You just try and do what what they're you know, what they're asking you to do and you know I think every you know every head coach and every every coordinator is different from what they expect from you Yeah, I mean art does a great job of that not not just for myself but for all our guys, you know He you you know He does a great job of adapting to the people that we have and each You know each year is gonna be different each You know sometimes each week depending on who's up and who's down is gonna be different and you got to You know try and accentuate the things that guys do well But then you know in position to be successful and I think you know for me I feel like he's done a really good job of that put me in positions where I'm comfortable He's constantly asking me about you know, how I feel about certain things that we're doing and I've really enjoyed, you know that back and forth Mario Davis You know just I don't know you just you play, you know, I think you know I talk to our coaches all the time about you want to get to the point where you're playing on autopilot, you know and you're not really thinking you're just going out there and Reacting to what you see because you you know done the work to put yourself so that your eyes and feet are in the right spot But when you're making a play that's off schedule you you know, you're you're just trying to get the first down and You know, that's that's as simple as it is. I don't really know what else you think about I mean, I kind of feel like I'm you know, I kind of feel like I've done this throughout my entire career and some weeks, you know probably You know happens more often, but You know, I really think I've played the same way for a long time I think, you know, I You know, I don't know I think it comes down to you know making the plays on the field Sunday You know, I think he he's got a knowledge of my skill set for sure, you know and And I hadn't know some of the guys, you know on their defense too and they know me and you know those kind of things But I think more so than anything, you know He what I've learned from him and what he's gonna do is he's gonna have his guys ready to play and they're gonna understand what they're trying to do and He's he's really good about that. So I know that, you know, the familiarity of knowing that their guys will be ready to go Those guys are gonna know what they're trying to accomplish on the defensive side of the ball We're gonna have to step up to that and and you know, you know match that and you know, hopefully be better than that Like Yeah, he's he's been critical, you know saving saving plays for us You know, those are the unsung heroes You know that kind of create explosive plays And Mike's willingness to do it and and the physicality with which he does it You know is is is huge for us I've you know, nobody appreciates that nobody appreciates it more than I do and And you know, he's he knows that he knows how I feel about that, but he's done a great job for us in terms of past protection Yeah, that's that's just who Jake is, you know weekend and week out He works extremely hard does a great job during the week of getting himself ready to go understanding The players that he's going against and coming up with it with a really good game plan for himself in terms of run game and past protection and You know, he's he's a he's just a solid player and more often than not those are the type of weeks. He's gonna have he's gonna be rock solid for us Where they You know, I don't view it as anymore, you know, this is This two different teams, you know to two different years completely different, you know spots of of the season so I've played long enough to know you got to let things go and you got to move on to what's in front of you And worry about the things that are in front of you CP I can't you know, it's hard to say because I can't speak for you know previous experiences that he's had Since he's come into the building he's worked hard He has a unique skill set You know and I think our coaching staff has done a good job of You know putting them in spots to make place and to bring the best out of them So I can't speak on on the previous eight But this year, you know from the moment he got here He's been locked in dialed in and done a great job for us Yeah, just be really clear with him, you know, if we're running routes or doing things like that what I expect You know, we talk a lot on the side one-on-one, you know about, you know If we're running this route, I'm really expecting you to be at this depth or at this spot He's he's receptive and and you know, he's got the ability to then do it, you know, which is it's one thing to know It's it's really important that you're able to do it and You know that part of it has been really productive for us, but he's worked hard You know, he really has we asked him to do a lot of things and line up in a lot of different places And he's worked really hard to get himself ready week in and week out Yeah, I mean he's he's he was a great teammate for for a long time and You know playing a little bit different role and position then he was here in Atlanta, but He's doing a nice job. He really you know He's always been a physical player for him to kind of move down more into the box and play some of that linebacker spot I mean, he's he's more than capable of doing it and he's played really well. So I Know he's a great player and I know how tough he is and how hard he works. So it's gonna be a challenge More on the other end like when you're learning the system like damn I didn't know it as well as I thought I was you know The conversion rules or stuff like that early on I feel like sometimes it gets you that way but No, I mean for the most part, you know, I feel like You know, I feel like I've got a consistent approach and know, you know what I can and cannot do and try and play to my strengths Is there any parallel Yeah, I think it's different, you know, I think You just don't see it as often, you know in football to basically You know, they basically rebuilt one-third of their team in the outfield that'd be like that's replacing the whole, you know Offense or you know special teams or something like that. It's just it's just That part of it is different I think the things you can, you know, draw on though in terms of comparisons is about, you know Really the team, you know, kind of grinding through the season Finding their way and then coming together at the right time and getting hot at the right time and you know, I think those are the things that translate, you know from baseball to football to basketball to whatever it is and It's a team, you know that when you watch from the outside perspective didn't lose any belief Didn't lose any confidence even through the ups and the downs and I think I think it was like after the all-star break They had like 18 games in a row where it was win-loss win-loss win-loss, right up down So I'm not sure of the exact number, but that's kind of the pattern we've been in And so hopefully we can get to that point where we push through that or able to stack some wins, you know Back-to-back and get hot like they did Thank you guys appreciate it


All right, yes, thank you so much for your lecture today, Dr. Sheth. At this time, we will open the floor for any questions from our audience. You may submit a question to Dr. Sheth through the Q&A feature. Oh, someone was asking me, is pulmonary embolism less common in masona syndrome? I'm not sure, I'll be very honest with you, I'm not sure I have read any statistics, but I would think that the patient is at risk for PE just like with any other DVT. It's just that, I think, but they are the main risk for this patient is actually chronic venous inefficiency. But I have to say, I haven't read anything that they're less, they're going to be treated with anticoagulants for sure, and they also have going to be treated with a thrombolysis and then scant. Okay, the other question is, what is the difference between hemodynamic significance to noses for instigating stenosis in the partial artery? Well, it's basically when we say hemodynamically significant, in my mind, it's whether the patient needs any kind of intervention or not. And so in the peripheral arteries, it's really, so when we, it's really, it's very difficult to answer the question because a lot depend on the degree of collateral vessels the patient has. So yesterday I was reading a CTA where the patient had multiple occlusions, they had stem that were occluded, but because they had good peripheral circulation, they actually had good flow in the distal bilateral extremities. So in the peripheral, in the lower extremity in particular, it really depends on the degree of collateral arterial circulation that forms. And so I can't say I have a good answer to it. I know that in the common carotid artery, in the, I'm sorry, in the internal carotid artery, we used to say 70% or more is hemodynamic significant in that, that this patient may benefit for endoterectomy, but I think they're doing less and less endoterectomy now and managing these patients more with medical treatment. So that's the answer I have, but it really depends on particular in the lower extremity about the degree of collateral circulation. Okay. The next question is based on the appearance of the thrombus, can we write in the report thrombus is stable or not, calcification, echogenic? Okay. So, and I have more experience with the veins here, but if, but that's actually probably for us, but let me, let me talk to them because that's what I know more about. If the vein is expanded, so the diameter of the vein is increased, then that's a, that's a sign that the thrombus is likely acute and fresh thrombus can actually be anechoic. So I think that more, a lot of the thrombi we're going to see now, echogenic, which makes them easier to recognize, but I think to see if something is acute or chronic, I will first look at the, the diameter of the vein, if the vein is expanded, that's a sign that it is more acute. If there is normal or decreased diameter of the vein, if there is just wall thickening and webs, so little echogenic lines, but, but not real thrombus, then I think you can say that it leads it's sub-acute and if there are calcifications in a vein where the wall is thickened, then it's much more likely to be chronic. And now we don't say, so I think Dr. Niddleman, who is Jefferson and is really an expert on venous ultrasound, he likes to say, if you see sequela from a previous DVT, he doesn't like us to say it's chronic DVT, he likes to say it's post-hombotic changes, and in this case usually the vein will be small, you have thickened wall, you may have echogenic webs and sometimes you will see collateral veins as well around the area. So if you see a lot of collateral veins around an area, that's also an indication that this may be at least sub-acute or chronic. Can I explain the concept of systolic tick again? Okay, so it's here. Okay, let's see. So basically what happens, okay, when you have an intraaortic balloon pump, okay, you want to give as much because the heart cannot pump. I mean, the patient usually have marked decreased ejection fraction, and I'm not a cardiologist, I'm not sure I get the physiology right, but what happened is that you have the initial systolic peak with the normal peak of the order, and then there is the assisted systolic with in diastolic the balloon expands to kind of try to move more blood forward in patients with low ejection fractions. This is why you have the second systolic peak. This one is reflex diastolic augmentation when the balloon expands to push more blood forward. How do we assess deep venous insufficiency? So I don't do this routinely, so what you look for, you look for with reverse solar flow and venous, and you know, flow going in a wrong direction in a vein, but I'm sorry, I don't do this routinely, so I cannot answer any better. I apologize for that. If peripheral arteries are biophysic or monophysic flow, should we write peripheral arterial disease in the ultrasound report? Okay, so biophysic is at least if you have some flow below baseline, okay, if you have a short systolic upstroke and some flow below baseline, I think that's okay because sometimes the triphysic, the third peak, is very, very small and you can't see it. If you have monophysic flow, yes, you have to suspect that there is something else going on and we're concerned about peripheral arterial disease. Yes, if there is monophysic flow and if you have tautous perverse, that's even more of an indication that there is either an occlusion or stenosis more centrally. And so let me look at the last two questions, so please report the concept of monophysic or gel flow, okay, so that really depends where you are. So in the, we were talking about peripheral or gel systems, so in the peripheral arteries, in the arms or the legs, because we supply, they supply muscles, which is a high resistance bed, you should have a short systolic upstroke, you should have reversal of flow, transient reversal flow in diastole. If you have a more central stenosis, the theories, the flow will become very turbulent and there may be some vasodilator and other chemical phenomenon at work, which will say that the flow becomes, you have a parvastatus where you have a lack of sharp systolic upstroke, you have a more sloppy initial systole, and then you have turbulent flow because of the stenosis or the occlusion, and so you have a lot of turbulent flow, you have more flow in diastole, that's the best explanation I can give you. Okay, two more, so if there is positive upstroke in the femoral vein, does it indicate, so okay, so when you look at this positive upstroke in the femoral vein, so you should have some positivity, now sometimes you have a lot of positivity because the patient's in cardiac failure, and so again what I always do is look at the other side, if both sides look the same and there's increased spasitility, it's possible the patient has cardiac failure, and sometimes you'll see this, right, because patients came with low extremity dima, usually bilateral, and you know the question is that, is that heart failure? If it's unilateral, then I worry, and one of the things that it can be, if it's unilateral, and there is increased spasitility as opposed to decreased spasitility that I showed you, is that you may be dealing with an arterial venous fistula, you have to look at the artery, there are other signs to look at, the patient has a risk factor, does the patient have a recent procedure, etc. Okay, so it's past one o'clock, so I think I'm going to stop, I really thank you very much for attending, and I thank you for the excellent questions, I hope I was able to answer most of them at your satisfaction, thank you very much.


t. Let's do a bodybuilding show. Did a bodybuilding show. Everybody was like, Lane, you're crazy. Like all my friends from high school, like you can't win, I won. And it's like, oh, I can do something else. And then it was, let's try a PhD. Let's do that, right? This is like progressive overload for life.  And so I love what Goggins said. It didn't really resonate at the time, but now I understand. He said, I'm not here running 100 miles to be like the most in shape person. I'm doing this so when I get a call at 3 a.m. in the morning, finding out my mom died, I don't fall apart.  And I think that's the, I know I'm going to a long monologue here, so I apologize. But I think one thing about having kids that's the hardest thing about having kids is knowing that they have to fail. They have to experience pain. They have to experience trauma because if they don't have a little bit of that when they're young, God forbid the first time something bad happens to them, they'd be in their 20s. Jordan Peterson says it's the single worst thing that we can do to our kids is to do something for them that they can do themselves. That thing you build confidence in children is you let them fail and let them figure it out.  Just the other day, my daughter, she wanted to go work out with me. First time she asked to work out with me, right? This is the first time? Daddy's heart melted. First time, she's six years old. So I'm like, okay, you know, I'm like, I just want to encourage her to have fun, right? Yeah, you got to build a relationship.    I'm like, honey, I know you can do this, okay? Just keep pulling, right? So then she did 45 pounds and she's like, I did it. I'm like, yeah, you did it. I'm like, you want to try more? She's like, yeah, let's try more. So we did 50 and she got that. And then we did 55 and she got that, right? And then the next day she goes, can we go do that again? I'm like, yeah, sure, let's go do it again. And she got, she ended up getting 65 pounds. And she's stepping up to the bar and I'm like, she's like, it's heavy. I'm like, I know, but you can do it. And she goes, I know, it's such a cute video. And she went and did it, but it's like, that's, at first it was hard and she wasn't able to do it. And then the other thing was she watched me when I was coming back to, I love this story.  She had seen me like go through injuries and I'd kind of told her about it because she asked me about it. And I said, you know, your dad was really good at this. I almost won a world championship, you know? And then I had all these issues and pain and you know, and she would come and just watch me train in the garage. And then one day I was talking to her about this and she goes, are you going to try and be a champion again? Like my chest grew like three inches immediately.  Like, so when I was getting ready for nationals last year, she got to come to nationals, so to my son. And the day before, she's like, I'm scared for you. And I'm like, what do you mean? She's like, well, what if you don't win?  I'm like, no, I have to win this. And then I get to go to the world championships and I'd have to win that, you know? She's like, I'm scared for you. What if you don't win? I said, you know, honey, that might happen. But you know what's important is I never gave up. Like I was really frustrated. I was really upset. I felt like there was times when I couldn't do it, but I didn't give up, you know, tearing up talking about this. And so like when I won the next day at nationals, first off, this kid is screaming so loud in the audience. It's so cute, you know? And then the last deadlift, I pull it, I turn around to go back. She rushes the platform. You know, you're not supposed to do this. She rushes the platform, comes up, hugs me, you know? And then I like, after I asked if I could take her out in the metal stand. So she gets to walk. I've got so many great pictures of me like holding their hand, walking out to the metal stand with me. They put the metal around my neck and I put it around her neck. And she's like looking at like, you know, like so excited. So then I went to Canada, won the world championship. I was FaceTiming whether she's so excited. So I get back literally now every single person, like every person that we meet, she's like, my daddy's a world champion. Like we're out at a restaurant and the waiter comes over, she's like, my daddy's a world champion. You know, like it's so cool. But I'm like, that, again, I don't want to like overemphasize why I wasn't doing it for my kids. You know, I was doing it for me. But what a great lesson they got to see. You know, like, and my, like I said, my best friend, Mike, he was at, he was at nationals and he was actually at Worlds too. And he said, dude, your daughter is going to remember that for the rest of her life. Oh yeah, 100%. He's like, you know, she got to see her dad struggle and get through it. And you know what? Kids, you can say whatever you want. It's about what you do. 100%. And you said the right thing though when she asked you, what if you lose? I might, honey. Yeah, you might. I might, that happens in life. Sometimes we put a lot of work in and we do it and we don't win. So the biggest powerlifting meet in history is this weekend. It's called Sheffield. It's invite only and it's different than any other powerlifting meet in history in that you have to, the winner is determined by who breaks the world record by the greatest amount. Wow. Okay. In their weight class. Wow. So you're not, so you're going to see people going for broke and taking lifts that they usually wouldn't take because it's all about who can break the records, right? And so my old coach, Ben, so my current coach is a guy named Zach Robinson with data-driven strength. I used to be coached by Ben Escro. Zach was not able to come to Canada for Worlds because he was doing his PhD data collection.  We have a great relationship. And you know, I was texting with him yesterday because his girlfriend, Leah, is the French national champion and has a good shot to like basically win this whole thing. Like she is a beast. This girl's like, competes in the 63 kilo class and has squatted like 460 pounds. Dead lifts over 500 pounds. Like it's crazy, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So Ben's over there handling her and we're just like talking about the meet and stuff. And I said, you know, I think one thing I've always had is confidence. And confidence doesn't necessarily mean you have the confidence that you're going to win.    And then when it got down to it, the Mexican national champ, he'd won three years in a row in my weight class and he's, I would have the bigger deadlift. He had the bigger squatting bench. So we got to deadlift. I was down by 33 pounds. And I remember Mike went up to Ben and he was like, dude, like his mic doesn't really know how powerful that was. I was like, dude, like, how's he doing? Like, and I was, Ben thought I was out at your shop and I had my earphones turned off and Ben goes, he's going to win. And even before that, speaking of the confidence thing, I was just having such a good time. I went up to the Mexican national champ. I fist bump, I said, let's give him a show. We smiled at him. So it's like, cause I'm like, man, I'm not even supposed to be here. You know, like how cool of an experience to actually be at IPF worlds and just be in the mix and have a shot. You know? So like, you cannot get that like level of experience and confidence without doing. You can read all about it. I mean, Brian Callan said this, right? You can read every book about boxing. You can shadow box, you can watch guys, you can analyze fights, but if you've never been punched in the face, you're not going to be able to handle it the first time it happens, right?  It's the great dichotomy of life. Whatever makes it easier in the short term will make it harder in the long term. Whatever makes it harder in the short term makes it easier in the long term. 100% well said. Lane, always a pleasure, my friend. It's a great one, yeah. It's a good mic drop, right? Thanks for coming. Guys, I always have such a great time with you all. You guys are great dudes. I was telling people, you know, every time I get to get a chance to go out to mine pump, you know, we don't always agree on everything, but one thing I'll say is those guys met me like at the worst part of my life, and you guys were like so supportive. Sal, you were texting me so much. Like, is there anything we can do?  Oh, thanks. Awesome. Same, same, appreciate it. Thank you, bro. Appreciate it. Today we're going to teach you everything you need to know to build a strong, well-developed chest. When I think of weak points and areas that I struggled with developing for a really long time, chess was up there with the world. Yeah, it was for me. It was for me, for sure. I got more caught up in the weight I could lift versus how I was developing my body. I think it's one of the most challenging muscles to develop for most people because the form and technique.


They cry, can't you see? Over his body How are their hearts that's believing? That's when he dies they can't rest And with the death of Al-Kawom Tears are shedding east and west Even the sky sheds tears for him With Al-Kawom later With him gone ever Is there great tears?  They cry, can't you see? Over his body With his death the days are darkened And his Shi'a cry For these tears they waste The cost of a love so too many This loving of Al-Kawom An oath, an oath that Shi'a Imam Qawom was the Quran That his followers read The love of Ahmed they had won But now their hearts are dead Imam Qawom was the Quran That his followers read The love of Ahmed they had won But now their hearts are dead Over his body They cry, can't you see? They cry, can't you see? Over his body The day turns dark with deep anger Like when Heidel's blood The same darkness poisons his son That blood did not start with It was shaped her and she Cries instead This pure bloodline was always killed So Qawom's death was fate And Shi'a hearts love is instilled For Mehdi they will wait Over his body They cry, can't you see? They cry, can't you see? Over his body


So guys I am back with another Cyberpunk 2077 video and today we check out yet another new Incant to the game. This one though, me and many players feel there's much more to it, but today we're getting to it all. How's it going guys, my name is DPJ and if you do enjoy the video leave me a like, it really helps out and if you like what you see and want to see more be sure to subscribe. Okay so this Incant I believe was data mined just after the 1.5 patch, but the little girl involved I believe was added into the game with the 1.6 patch update. Okay so if you come to city centre Corpo Plaza and use either these fast travel points, I'm right now in the Reconciliation Park point where it's this park she's found, but any fast travel point here is fine. So from the point I am at guys, again I am at the Reconciliation Park point, follow the direction and take on screen now. You'll end up at this spot where a little girl is standing if you can interact with. Now sometimes she speaks to you, sometimes she yells at you, sometimes she starts showing signs up and other times, she basically signals that she's watching you. Now I've witnessed a few things that can happen with this girl, but what's creepy about the fact is guys if you run away from her, she follows you. Now I've almost run out of this entire park and she follows you right to the edge of it, then she turns back around and makes her way back to the initial spot where she can be found, where those bottles and cans are lined up by that tree setting. Now she will sometimes lead you to a tree and start throwing things at this tree among doing other things. Now her name is Arabella Lavasha and there's already been a lot of speculation theories based around her. Now I've researched online and I found a few reddit posts about who this girl could be, but I did eventually find out guys that she is indeed an easter egg from the world of Nat 19. Arabella is a character in the forgotten realm's campaign of Nat 19, she is a member of the Vistani and daughter of Lavash. So it's definitely a reference to this and her, but is there something more to this or is it just an easter egg reference? Many think there might be something more to it, I am one of them. Now you will notice that she does have a green marker on a mini map too. Now whether she is part of a new gig, a new gig to come that ain't in the game yet or something else, we are trying to figure that part out. Now she for some people doesn't appear, for others she does. For me and my main high level character, she was here night and day, she's also here on my newly created level 7 character. But guys if you know anything more about this please let us know down below, if you want to try and solve this mystery, you know where to look. But there we have it guys, yet another new encounter in the world of Cyberpunk 2077, added with a 1.6 update patch. And there we have it guys, the end of the video has arrived, if you enjoyed it leaving a like really helps out, feel like what you see and want to see more, be sure to subscribe and hopefully guys, I will see you on that next one.


This study proposes a low-cost and reliable smart fire alarm system that utilizes ultraviolet, UV, detection technology with an aspherical lens to detect fires emitting photons in the 185 to 216 nanometer range. The system integrates the aspherical lens with an accelerator and a digital compass to determine the fire's source direction, allowing for safe evacuation and effective firefighting. Artificial intelligence is employed to reduce false alarms and achieve a low false alarm rate. The system's wide detection range and direction verification make it an effective fire detection solution. Upon detecting a fire, the system sends a warning signal via Wi-Fi or smartphone to the user. The proposed system's advantages include early warning, a low false alarm rate, and detection of a wide range of fires. Experimental results validated the system's design and demonstrated high accuracy, reliability, and practicality, making it a valuable addition to fire management and prevention. The proposed system utilizes a parabolic mirror to collect UV radiation into the detector and a simple classification model that uses Fourier transform algorithm to reduce false alarms. The results showed. This article was authored by Tsong Tuan Chuong, Tan Hung Nguyen, Van Quang Vu, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


I stumbled on something, John, that I now find has been here for about six months. And that is if you go into settings, this is on your iPhone, settings, music, and I'm going to go there with you here to make sure that we're going to the right place. So we go to settings, we go to music, which I will find, I swear. And then if you look in the audio section, well, first of all, there's the Dolby Atmos stuff. If you have AirPods Pro or AirPods Gen 3, I highly recommend turning on the Atmos stuff and playing around with that because it's really awesome. Like it's so well done. If you have tracks downloaded onto your phone that are not yet Atmos, you need to delete them so that you can hear the Atmos versions of the tracks. But but there's some fantastic stuff like Abbey Road is amazing. It's awesome that there's other stuff that's good too. But the second thing in the settings, music, audio section there is audio quality. And you get to pick what type of quality you have on different on different methods, right? So for downloads, you can tell it how you want it and you get different options of how that's going to work. You can do lossless or not. Wi-Fi streaming, of course, you get to pick. But the one where it gets interesting is cellular streaming. And there are four options if you are an Apple Music customer and two options if you are not. The options are high efficiency AAC with low data usage that's available to everyone as is high quality AAC 256K. And then you get two lossless versions if you are an Apple Music customer. Just the typical ALAC up to 2448 and then what they call high res lossless, which is ALAC being Apple lossless audio codec up to 24192K. So if you have the ability to hear frequencies that only dogs could hear, maybe that'll make a difference for you. So yeah, and it's that I've set mine on cellular streaming to be the high efficiency AAC with low data usage and it like generally the only place where I would hear stuff like that is in the car and I have not noticed a difference.