Welcome back into another edition of the Falcons audible presented by AT&T Cameron Dicker hits a last second field goal against Atlanta Falcons this weekend and the Falcons lose 20 to 17 to the Chargers at home. They fall one game below 500 on the season. He's Dave Archer DJ Shockley. I'm Derek Rackley We're gonna talk about all things that happen in that game and then we're gonna turn to page We gotta turn to page quickly this week fellas. We got a game coming up here as we record this show in about 24 hours so excuse me 48 hours, so we got a we got to move on to the Panthers But let's start with the Chargers Dave. Let's start with some some first reactions here We are kind of talking about next week, but we'll come back After losing this game. Is it getting to the point to where it's a must-win situation this week on Thursday? Yeah, I don't think it's a must-win unless you're being eliminated, right? Yeah, but because you're one and two in the division and now you're tied with Tampa again Who's two and one in the division if you begin to start doing the math Then you think you can't drop a division game, right? You need to win the division game So but it unless you're all being eliminated. I don't ever like to use the must-win center. Got it DJ. What about you? Yeah, I thought similar obviously with where you stand hum is you know Our says mentioned the where Tampa stands and obviously, you know, they got a big one at the end over the Rams I don't like to say must-win either unless that's you know the last game of the season It's gonna get you into playoffs but other than that I think you still got a lot of football left to play but I do understand the importance of winning inside your division Yeah, that's a big deal. So in that sense of must-win, I think yeah, but for the entirety of the season still got a lot of ball Yeah, no, I feel you guys I understand which direction you're going I'm gonna flip it slightly on you guys and take some of what like like the coaches would tell us Guess what every week in the NFL is a muscle in situation. So they're not saying over there Oh guys, you know, it's just okay Let's just go out there and play our best and if it's not good No, the guys on the team and the coaching staff they're saying we're going out to win the freaking game this week So that's kind of what some of the reactions our fans you probably will be are looking at it Saying yes, it is a must-win if they want to stay pace in the division But let's talk about what happened this past game because Dave we talked about it Well before we walked in the studio here this morning kind of a weird game Like Falcons came out like gangbusters just marching down the field They come up short on the second drive, but they still get points on the board and then all sudden you click over into the second Quarter and like it's like a different game two different teams Atlanta kind of slows down the chargers kind of speed up a little bit What was your take? What was the kind of shift in momentum between quarter one and two?  You had you had a lot going on You're able to mix in some pass. You kind of were dictating throughout the entire part of those first two drives I mean I looked at the play sheet and I said Atlanta to run 21 plays in the Chargers run three Yeah, I'm going wow just you talk about domination You had like you had the ball for like 12 minutes and 12 and a half minutes of the first quarter And you only had ten points Yeah, and you if it felt kind of a little deflating there And I think the Chargers got a little bit of a boost that they got a stop down there It made it it was only ten nothing Then let's say you have 14 not that how much difference is that I don't know You go down to these two you punch two touchdowns in the first two times you touch it That feels a little bit different than getting stopped and taking a field goal I felt like that the Chargers got a little bit of momentum off of that And then started to put some things together in a second quarter DJ It's got it's got to be one of those situations though where Atlanta gets up 10 Nothing on the Chargers in the first quarter and you got to feel like you're in a good position But then you got to think at some point Herbert is gonna figure this out Like he's a top five call it quarterback in the league for a reason and Dave you talked about the two touchdowns would have felt Better the Chargers respond with two touchdowns in the second quarter and it really just kind of flipped the game around Yeah, you think early in the ball game there wasn't I want to say much attention But the Chargers are trying to do other things with their offense and then they said, okay We got to do back in number 30 that can really make things happen And they started feeding him in multiple ways out the backfield started, you know giving it to him and he was making some plays making some positive runs and I think early in the ball game the Falcons were really good on early downs I mean you're talking about first and second down were really big for him and they were able to you know Being third is short or maybe not even get the third down Then you get to that second quarter and the Falcons have was like three straight three and outs or something like that And now okay here the defense gains confidence for the Chargers now their offense starts to pick up And Eckler starts to get going a little bit. I give it to him And he ends up taking it down But this was I thought just most some of the time was a lack of execution As far as hitting some guys some guys dropping some balls some guys You know Mario not really hitting a lot of guys sometimes I mean it was a multitude of things that culminated in why they were able to come back It just wasn't one or two guys, but obviously your execution that second quarter I think didn't match what you had going on in the first Yeah, and I think if you're looking for a play to look at that kind of flip the thing the script for for the Chargers Was a third and 15 play from their own 10 yard line or 12 yard line And your rush doesn't quite do what you're looking for to do you wanted to push Herbert left or right? When he escapes forward It's a problem because he's got a big arm He could throw on the move or he can take off like most quarterbacks But if you shove him either way he his percentage goes way down when you shove him out the other direction Cut the field in half he escaped forward found Palmer on that deep end cut and that got him going and all of a sudden boom Then they they converted six consecutive third downs from that point on which led to the two touchdowns At that point you'd kind of been had him off his sorts He was kind of not feeling it and he wasn't finding guys and the next thing you know He got the ball to Palmer got some of the receivers. We knew he wouldn't work with Williams or Allen in the game Right, so I get Everett in the game. I got some guys I started getting them the football and they started feeling okay about themselves So you kind of gave them a little breath of fresh air there on that third 15 conversion Here's another thing that I thought was big in a game, too And you talk about what the Chargers were doing on those I mean four in that particular drive they converted third downs and on the other side for the Falcons because you were bludging them So badly in that first quarter they started to add more guys to the freight They start to add more good I think they brought in a couple extra D linemen. I mean they were adding linebackers They were doing a lot of run blitzes and now you look at it you go second to 10 second 11 Here comes third and eight or nine and that makes it a lot tougher So they changed their plan going in that second quarter as well so Falcons end up Having a really good first quarter 145 yards of offense 92 rushing But then the second quarter as we talked about Chargers 166 yards of offense It was kind of like you poked a bear a little bit and they came alive Falcons continue to do what they do all season long and that's run the football They've had success Dave I want to ask you a question about the presidents of the presence of Cordero Patterson back in the lineup Because it seems like Arthur Smith now. He's got options. He's he's seen enough from Algier He's seen enough from Huntley to have confidence that those guys can continue to run the rock And now he's playing a little bit of CP in the backfield a little bit of CP on the outside Did you see enough to be encouraged from from Cordero Patterson moving forward now that he kind of gets his legs back underneath himself? Absolutely, and you know what he's capable of doing So I asked Arthur and his crew on his coach's show Did you have him on a pitch count? He goes? I wouldn't like to call it a pitch count But we were monitoring how much they were using him. So Essentially me saying this it was there was some kind of count that he was on as to how much they wanted him Exposed so to speak to the to the contact and how much he was carrying the football But you saw it right out of the block you go no backs the first play the game It's a little bit out to him outside He gets nine and you go back and hand it off to him and he runs for about seven So you got so by do to answer your question We talked a little bit about this last week and I said CP was definitely playing this You got it But his versatility and that package is gonna expand now I think you'll see that in the Carolina game And that's the part as we get to that and we start talking about Carolina That'll be part of the game plan that Carolina has it necessarily seen Because they didn't see PC CP what 11 days ago when we get to Thursday, right? I didn't I didn't get a chance to hear the call of When he runs over the guy, I would have loved her I was trying to set that up. I mean Can we talk about him running over Drew tranquil on that play through even over through I mean Through his body Because they had to remove his helmet from his chest I mean listen Drew had a good game like he was all over the field made a lot of tackles And there are just certain times when you don't want to run the tape back And that's one that drew tranquil is never gonna want to see again and conversely CP gonna be shown that one to his kids and his grandkids for years I thought I thought it was classic defilements have a mic'd up with Grady this week And they actually had they showed him when this happened and his face was like God this grown man just obliterated another I could I could think of as John Collins posterizing somebody Like that that's kind of way it felt and I know it felt that way to try and call the first thing that hit the ground For twinkle was his name plate. Yeah, I mean boom and his name plate was the frizz back at the ground I asked CP a post game and he just got a big grin on his face. He said hey man. He was between me and the goal And I wanted to go You know last week I got fired up with a passion where Kyle Pitts and this one like I mean he got up through It's almost like CP is too cool to do it, but it's like he wanted to talk so much So much Still had the where fall to get the ball over the line like if I ever did that So, you know we talked a little bit about the offense defense, you know struggling a little bit on third down Dave Let me ask you this like Where do they need to sharpen their swords on that side of the ball? Well, I mean you got it Let's keep it in perspective now.  He runs a depot or runs a crossing round So from a perspective if I'm teaching I would assume if you're John Hoke or whoever you're doing the DB coach Or if your D&P's you're saying, okay, I cannot give up the inside right and so Cornell if you look at the play Palmer gives him a little stutter step outside. He's already inside already. I mean just protect the inside take that away I don't have any help inside I can use the sideline as the extra defender if he decides to go that way and I can funnel him But he got beat inside right now. Yeah, that's that's what I wrote down. It's like he missed I don't know what the technique was I said, but I wrote down He missed a jam at the line of scrimmage You gotta get your hands on them exactly at least mess up the timing at the start But he got off right away right cut inside and right after you get like a big play They just to give it right back up, right? So now you know you can now you can't you don't have enough time if you're Jalen Hawkins Who hopefully comes down and tries to make the play he can't even get there in time right right because he wins so quickly So now Herbert's getting the ball out before we ever get any pressure So yeah, it was that from a technique standpoint. There's certainly things they can improve on yeah now Having the guys out there you would like to have out there Well, there's a lot of teams that aren't doing that in fact the Chargers played without their two best receivers a lot of that I thought the same thing. I mean when you watched the game I thought there were a couple times in crossing routes over routes We were a step behind or the communication wasn't there You know you're passing it off or you're not passing off the technique you talk about I thought was a issue in the game because you think about that last one But there were other plays throughout the game where Herbert climbs in the pocket And he finds a guy over the middle like even just the dig right in the middle You can see Corny Armstrong pointing on that third and 15 like somebody's supposed to come help him Or is he supposed to go with him and look like he was a little unsure on that particular play So I wonder on the back end is there still some communication stuff that they have to work out when it comes to play similar to that Well, that's what's big about when we talk about it all the time if we can buy time as quarterbacks for extra time Then it's hard to stay Disciplined in the back end because if you're an if you're an intermediate defender a linebacker or a safety It's in that intermediate area and a guy flashes in front of you your eyes naturally at the quarterbacks moving up Your eyes are naturally to go to him and there's a guy in behind you Can you stay disciplined enough if it's a zone to stay in that area take that throw away making throw the ball underneath I think those are still some things they're working through. It's not an overly old team or in a lot of cases Not an overly experienced team in certain areas, so they're still working through some of that stuff I do think they had a really good defensive stop late in the game If you remember Palmer catches a seam route with about five minutes six minutes to go into game And they get it to the eight yard line Atlanta bows their back right there and holds them and makes them kick a field goal Which tied the game as opposed to them punching it in and taking the lead and I thought that was a big moment for the defense Yeah, and you know we've I understand it happens, but I as soon as that happened I thought back to the coup miss that he had because he's just been so automatic all year was a 50 order I mean that's not a chip shot or anything, but it looks like he just pushed it right away And I'm thinking if it's only had that field goal right now It could be a different story on that margins tighter Yeah, what you're talking about rack because you only had I think he had nine possessions in this game normal NFL games It's somewhere around 12 possessions. Yeah, so if you're gonna run the ball as well as we're running it And let's say the other team runs it to some success Now was sudden it's a it's an eight nine possession game And so if you miss shots like that or miss opportunities get a guy open the end zone you're missing That comes back and magnifies itself because you're not gonna get that many shots So you have to be that much cleaner when you play. All right, so we can't really do anything about that one now It's a loss as we've mentioned Atlanta Falls a game below 500 on the season now tied with Tampa an overall record, of course Tampa Holding a slight edge right now This episode in part brought to you by the Home Depot Everything you need for your next home improvement project is just a tap away on the Home Depot app The Home Depot app digital toolbox gives you access to how-to guides Project calculators and image search so you'll know exactly what you need to pick up with the tap of the finger You can rent and reserve the right tools for the job Also browse through millions of items from top brands that you can have delivered right to your door Whatever your project find exactly what you need with the Home Depot app download the Home Depot app today But guys let's kind of talk let's move forward because like we said like the team already has to move forward because as we record They got a game in about 48 hours or a little bit more than that because they're playing on Thursday night football Again, it's another one of those situations. You can't make any excuses right short week Guess what a lot of teams in the NFL do this every single week. They got a plan a short week So but the only difference in here arch as we just played this team as you mentioned about 11 12 days ago What did Carolina learn from the last game against Atlanta when they lost that you think they're gonna try to change their game plan To put out a better performance at home against Atlanta Well, the front seven will all have neck rolls on because the run games coming Yeah, because in case you didn't watch the Cincinnati game Joe mixing just went completely off For a team that does not run the football Cincinnati We played them a few weeks ago and they ran for like 40 yards or something like in the game now burrow through it all over the Place but mixing just scored five touchdowns four on the ground and the week before that Atlanta touched them up for 175 on the ground. Oh, by the way, Atlanta just ran for 200. Yeah, what do you think's coming run the rock?  We can't overthrow it. We can't overthrow. We can't drop them You got to hit them because we talked about limited possessions. Anyway, must it how hard is it? You and I know in quarterbacks and you played quarterback as well How hard is it to put 12 13 plays together every time you go in the field? It's nice to have a couple of drives like that right a holding or something Explosives you know that you have a 30 40 yard play the short in the field and give you some energy It's a momentum and get that other team reeling gotta hit those shots. Yeah, and there and the personnel is there I mean we've seen a more concerted effort to get the ball downfield to Kyle Pitts Obviously Drake London can do it even the shots that we've got to Demir bird OZ has had some opportunities the guys are there But you're right when they do take the shot downfield when Mario to finds that guy down the field they got to find a way to connect or You got to bail your quarterback out like you got to make a better catch, right? Your wide receiver has got to go up over the top of somebody you got to fight through contact whatever it may be DJ As good as many arts where we you know About one here and there, you know, right you did it too. So let me ask you this question What adjustments do you think that Carolina is gonna make let's take Atlanta's running game out of it? Which what adjustments do you think they'll make either offensively or defensively to give them a better chance to come away with a Win in this game, you know, I think over the time PJ Walker who they said will be starting on Thursday night I think is a guy that I think they want to use more with his legs He hasn't really used his legs at all. I went back and looked at it in his five games He has three attempts for 25 yards This is a guy that's considered a guy who can move and run He doesn't really use his legs now I think that's a part of the game that I know they want to probably implement because he's got a can get on the edge He can get on the corner You've seen other quarterback to create plays with their legs and arms Maybe this is a game on a short week where the plan kind of stays similar Everybody knows when you have these short games for fans who don't know there's not really much you do on the field It's all about getting your body back and prepare ready to go So the plan is somewhat similar aren't talking about the Falcons game somewhat similar, but adding a wrinkle here They were CP. I think they're gonna have a similar plan But maybe now you use PJ Walker more in the run game I'm we're on the edge that gives them maybe another what they feel is an advantage in this game to help them All right. I got a question for you then. Okay. Tell me Baker Mayfield came in the game and play and took him down and they scored two touchdowns He played pretty well in his relief performance. I'll be at the game was probably over and you can car at garbage time or whatever But Baker got some kind of rhythm going So now PJ Walker supposed to start. Okay, and you know that there's probably a much shorter leash Mm-hmm on you potentially in this game So tell me your mindset is you're going in does that make you want to make more plays and all of a sudden Maybe you put the ball in harm's way more or do you play within the game plan? What do you what do you think his thought process is knowing the bakers on the sideline getting ready to come in potential? That's a really great question because as a guy who's actually been in that role before Your mindset early goes to I gotta find ways to keep myself on the field and when that happens There comes force there comes you trying to do a little bit more within the play now Maybe they may help him maybe because in the past He wasn't a guy who was really trying to push the ball down a field trying to force the ball into those tough spots I mean we saw him in the last game That he played here. He had a two or three just blatant over throws or throws He didn't hit that he probably wanted back and here's a game where you just saw a guy come in who you know They brought in for a reason and now he played solid, you know Whatever time he was in but the mindset is I gotta make plays and whether that turns into him making mistakes Or him becoming a better player We'll have to see on Thursday night, but in my mindset is every time I'm on the field I gotta make that series count. I gotta make that play count because if we're not moving we're not you know getting first As we're not scoring points. They're looking we gotta find a way to get in the end zone and Here comes another quarterback behind you who gives cable of doing it It makes it it makes it difficult for the mindset of a quarterback Especially when you know they will pull you and another guy can come in Yeah, I mean, I think it's a great question that you pose to a margin guys You know kind of talk about it as guys that have been in that situation before and I know that Atlanta's probably gonna prepare Defensively for both guys and I wouldn't be surprised if they're actually okay if they bring Baker may feel because if you know Mayfield's coming in. He's a gunslinger.  Maybe they're gonna be licking their lips a little bit on that one You guys talked about quarterbacks I do want to flip this a little bit because if you remember the last game There was a certain dude named foreman that had 26 carries 118 yards and three touchdowns Dave what Adjustments if any need to be made so he doesn't hurt them getting into the end zone as many times as he did in the last match Yeah, I think there's a bit there'll be a ton of studying rack on on their blocking schemes And some of the things they wanted to do we obviously misfit to run a number of times it gave him some creases There's also gonna be the ability for them to use what I was talking about for us to use and that's play action because we're gonna be Wanting to stop the run.  Maybe a little bit bigger players on the field destroy Anderson find himself on the field And all of a sudden you got that five linebacker set Or do you go away from that and put an extra defensive lineman on the field to create some clog up in there? To where the linebackers can get you know You can hang up some of those second level blockers so the linebackers can flow to get to fill some of these holes And then the other part of it is are you creeping the safety? Yeah, you know because if you see teams and we talk about all-time shock if they if teams want to play too Deep you got to be able to run it on if they're gonna play cover two or cover four You got to be able to run it because they don't have that that eighth guy to get in there Yeah, but does Atlanta shift to more single high safety and now all of a sudden Richie Grant and or Jalen Hawkins Is in the box and so and that's what they're thinking to over there Okay, how can I take advantage of that DJ more potentially or somebody like that? Let me let me go back and pose a question to arch okay going back to PJ Walker now You talked about obviously having another guy come in last week He throws three interceptions talking about being able to use the play action game to push the ball down the field Kind of two-fold on the Falcon side. Are you in the mindset of okay?    You saw it. They began to actually literally double. I hear guys say oh, he's double covered No, that's where two guys are coming from the same zone to a receiver That's not double coverage when you actually clamp a guy where you walk a guy out and they actually were doubling him inside and out Because that's the guy he wants to throw the ball to so you pay attention to where he is and then stop the run And if they can make some plays God bless them down the field make them make those plays Are you cautious after throwing three picks the previous week? Probably It goes back to what you guys are talking about played very much if it's PJ Walker or it's Josh Allen, right? That's a different story. Exactly.  Yeah, Walker's only what started five games in his career And maybe his future's in the balance and all I I mean like you said Josh Allen ain't worried about the future He's good. He said they're expecting me to throw the rock All right, so those are kind of some of the big picture elements that we see coming down on Thursday night Is the Falcons go on the road play play face the fan Panthers again Is it difficult to beat a team last question twice in a season and even more so this close together Yeah, it is because actually in division it makes it even harder because you know the personnel You know they want to I mean ours just we just talked about the entire personnel and what they want to do I'm sure they over there saying the exact same thing here their group of guys who they want to get the football to and this Is how they're going to do it. Here's someone to the sets that they're gonna show us and with it being so close You can expect it kind of be similar. So yes, it's absolutely hard on both sides With the short amount of time and who you're playing to be the team twice like that So DJ talked about it. This is you know, it's a different week in preparation.  Yeah, by the way, I'm not worried about their mindset Yeah, this drives me crazy when people start talking about the other teams mindset. Who cares what their mindset is?  I don't care We're coming get ready. Yeah. Yeah, they got enough to think about correcting some mistakes that they made last week So that's that's the story of the NFL who makes the least amount of mistakes and then who makes the plays down the field So we'll see how that ends up shaking out. That's gonna do it here for the Falcons audible presented by AT&T We appreciate however you get your podcast material continue to like subscribe review Spotify iTunes Atlanta Falcons calm and YouTube and we'll be back here to break it all down next week and hopefully these guys will have all of their best analysts cap on Yes, sir. Great work fellas. How about them dogs? How about them dogs? Yeah, by the way, Georgia Bulldogs hasn't been released yet number one in the country Number one in the country Dave you may you went out on a limb last week on CP. I'm gonna go out on a limb Georgia Bulldogs. Oh, wow Standing on a tree stump. Thanks so much for joining us everybody. We'll see you next week


Golden cup with them because there's going to be open runs of optimal course for time if you want to do that Does anybody have questions on the time? The only change about the name of call sign chaos or mad dog. Who am I talking about? The sea services Only I see my awesome fifth Anglico family, but today You gotta push the wood you gotta push the log all the way up there we go. There we go


But good afternoon, everyone, and welcome. This is Melissa Armo with the Stock Swoosh. Market's breaking out today, and it really looked heavy this morning, even though we gapped up. And then we ended up holding. So you could have played the market today as a day trade, as an option trade, and called a late, late call in this here for the trading room to push. I mean, I saw this was going to break out. So I called the trade here, which is kind of late. Why? It's after 10 o'clock. After 11 o'clock, we're into the 11 o'clock hour, but I saw the market was going to break out. So 280 is the first number. We're almost there. The market could, it might, have a massively big day today. I've been calling the market bullish all year. I do think the market is bullish into 2019. I think we closed the year strong. Yes, the elections turned out pretty much the way that everyone expected to. I think the market could have had a more bullish reaction if the Republicans had kept the house. But either way, the market really thought that the Democrats were going to win the house, and the Republicans were going to keep the Senate. And that is what happened. So the market reacted positive to what occurring, what it thought was going to occur anyways. So let's just take a look here at the queues. So the spy trade is working out. The queues trade is working out. And there's just big targets for these things here today. We'll even look at the diamonds. Typically, actually, this looks like this could have a big move too. So this option trade I'd call it. I didn't call it a day trade in this. Called the day trade in the queues, called the day trade in the spy. They're working.  The lungs are in play today, 12 o'clock, noon. I believe the market closes near the high. If you have time to hold what these trades hold them to big targets, the target for the spy today, for the dream target would be 282 or beyond. The dream target for the QQQs today would be 178 and it very well may get there. So good luck, everyone. And the stops that I called in these really should hold for most of the day. So watch your numbers, make sure you get out with profit and good luck.


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here So we're talking about that scream six teasers that dropped earlier this morning I'm gonna talk a little bit more about that a little bit more about that image that came out of our exclusive first look at Ghostface in the movie that came out from entertainment weekly and go over some of the comments that Matt and Tyler radio silence had to say in This exclusive interview that was released alongside this image of ghost face in this worn-down Ghostface mask of what I can only assume is of course something from the past so We got that teaser this morning It was mostly just seeing the four woods world survivors with the new characters on the subway Having Mindy get attacked at the end seeing different knots to other horror movies and not to West Cravens cursed a knot to Friday the 13th Jason takes Manhattan a knot to I There were so many things the one that stood out to me was definitely Jason obviously Ghostface 2 since it's their movie and then These other references they even had a reference to their own recent work with ready or not Where somebody was present dressed as Samara weaving's character from that movie So which I thought was a nice little nod to that So all of these different references and the DNA that they still are trying to keep of screen But doing it in this fashion. I appreciate it because we've never had a screen movie I believe set on any Halloween type of setting so the way they're gonna weave in those nods and homages to other Things in the horror in the horror spectrum doing it in this matter via the costumes on Halloween. Obviously, that's great I think I even saw the Baba Duke, which is we know as terrorist favorite But I want to jump into these comments from Matt and Tyler before I talk about this image of the worn down Ghostface mask now Matt and Tyler have explained a few things regarding screen six mostly about the characters that have come to New York And why they're here? They've started up by saying they have all come to New York to go to school said Tyler Gillette One of the things that was so exciting to us was bringing the story and bringing the slasher icon into a new location I think across the board for the writers guy and Jamie as well. This was such a fun opportunity to explore what? What that would feel like bringing the world to scream into that setting the teaser is a good example of how we're Having fun with that throughout the movie. That is one of many sequences in the movie that uses the city Really to its benefit and it's surprising in thrilling ways They go on to say that the this article mentions of course that Courtney Cox is bad gale weathers They've chimed in talking about gale weathers They said it's always good to see gale weathers and how her life has evolved It's really nice to see gale in her element in New York now in her element I assume means she will be acting somewhat similar to how we saw her in screen to And just kind of being what we know she had going on for herself prior to her return in screen five Just seeing how she acts in New York and seeing what her life is like We know we're expecting to see her her house That's one thing we hope to see going off of the filming that went on this past summer in the idea that we will see her house so They also had comments about Hayden. They said that Hayden was wonderful. She was really great It was fun to have her around to tell us about screen four. She had a lot of great stories She got to share it's that screen family. It's continuing to grow for us now They were asked about Samara weaving in her role all they simply said was she's in the movie We can't really because of spoiler stuff explain that I guess But we've been wanting to work with Samara again since the minute we wrapped on radio Not so it was just a joy to get her out to Montreal to shoot with us I mean your guess is as good as mine is what her role will be Seems like she has something very important going on in the movie since they're so tight-lipped about it So they also confirmed that of course Roger L Jackson will be back No surprise there he'll be voicing ghost face once again and they seem to have alluded to this new mask And why there is a new mask and there's a reason for this new looking mask now Roger will voice ghost face and talk a smidge about and he's talking a smidge about this new version of the mask featured in the film Which again was the image that you see on your screen They said that it will all make sense in the context that you see in the movie That's what Tyler Gillette said that was another one of the really interesting risk and creative the creative approaches in this movie It's meta in a different way and the mask very much factors into that now They said it was not an arbitrary choice. That's what Ben Bettennelli open said. So They did this for a reason. What is going on with this mask going off of what we were non It stated is happening in this theater like museum-esque location people have been spotting online If you don't want any real spoilers click away again I'm saying these are comparable to finding out the grass is green on the other side because that's really my thoughts on this I don't think these are major at all It seems as though there are costumes from ghost face sprees of the past Being held up somewhere in this movie. This is going off a viewer and on tweets and some behind-the-scenes images now Where are the mask for these costumes the mask or missing? Do we have a case where somebody is going around doing something similar? What Roman did in screen 3 with Marine Prescott pictures, but doing it now in the vein of ghost face masks Could you be seeing something like that go on or given that also in the Teaser we see a shot of ghost face with one version of that mask that we don't see in this exclusive EW picture Could we have two killers working against each other and not knowing that one exists? And we can have a ghost face versus ghost face scenario play out and Also, of course for the people out there who think it's stew mokker I will say that yes, there is a chance that stew mokker will be in screen 6. However If they're trying to keep it grounded in the sense that they're not doing anything out of the ordinary as Unrealistic as some people find Roman to be then stew will not be back. If they're keeping it grounded stew is not going to be back Still coming back as far more unrealistic than anything would scream through just to throw that out there. However Could you have somebody again that is tied to the past that has had access to all of these past? Past evidences from the other sprees that now wants to just wrap up loose ends. They're coming for all the survivors They'll they'll end it all by going for Sydney and then that'll be that Could it be something like that where you have somebody who wants all of this to end? It could be Leslie mokker. It could be somebody connected to stew mokker It could be somebody connected to the carpenters may begin its tears that I know I had a video like that out once Or it could be none of that and it could be one of the new characters and they're trying to throw you off And they're doing a very good job at doing that. However, also just to wrap it up. They said something about Neve Campbell Now they said that Neve Campbell's absence Their departure affected the script greatly. He argued or Gillette admitted this He argued that there's a silver lining to the actress's absence evidence in the movies depiction of the young survivors from the previous film We love never were huge fans of Sydney Prescott But it it felt like there's an opportunity to really dig into this new carpenters And I think people will be really surprised and pleased when I was successfully this movie does that I know I will be because again when they say that it affected it greatly I do want to add this it could be a case where she just had several pages of material But that those pages could have equated to maybe ten minutes of screen time Let's that there's a possibility something like that Even though the material they wrote was a great amount or what was written was a great amount the actual screen time It translated in wasn't much so greatly affecting the script and how it translated into screen time Is different that's just how I always have interpreted that type of stuff because screenplays can read a lot longer to you and Appeared longer than how you actually execute it when those are done But you guys can let me know what you think is going on with this old mask and why it's being used down the comment section below Because apparently there's a reason for it What do you think is going on in the teaser with Mindy? If you haven't already of course make sure you subscribe turn on post location in this video in the description I'll have links to all my social media accounts. I'm on Facebook toward an Instagram You can message me there, of course They let me know if there's any movies news or reviews like me to cover in the future and with all they Guys, I will see you in the next video


When you're getting your data ready for analysis, sometimes you need to do the same transformation to many different scores, like doing reverse coding or logarithmic transformations. Or maybe you need to take variables and convert them into ordinal categories. I want to show you an example of how to use Jamobi's transform function to take z-scores and identify whether they are extreme or not using the plus or minus two standard deviations criterion.  And then I get to choose a new transformed variable. Now what I'm going to show you can be done with a computed variable, but the advantage of doing it with a transformed variable is it saves that transformation function and then you can apply it to multiple variables at the same time if you want. The first thing we need to do is we need to define the actual function that we're going to use, the transformation function. And so I'm going to come right here to transform. I'm going to click on that and right now I don't have any transforms. I'm going to come down here to create new transform. And that brings up another dialog from the bottom. And now I'm going to label the transformation. And again, this is something that can be applied to multiple variables. And so it's not the name of a variable, but it's the name of what you're going to do to variables. And I'm going to call it extreme. And I'm going to say is score more than two standard deviations from mean. And I'm going to be using the z score so I don't have to compute everything else. And then what you have here is a variable suffix. And the idea is that if you have many different variables like q1, q2, q3 for question one, two, three, and doing a logarithmic transformation on all of them, it can create a new variable that includes, for instance, q1 underscore log or log and then in parentheses q1. There are a lot of different ways to do it. I'm just going to put this right here and say extreme. And then I'm going to do the recode condition. Now right now it's asking me just to replace it with something else. I have to do add recode condition. And source means the variable that you're starting with. And again, you can leave that there because you're going to choose that variable in the next dialog box. I'm simply going to say, if it's greater than two, then I'm going to say, assign the text, yes. And you have to put text in single quotes so it knows, otherwise it's going to try to read it as a variable name. Then I'm going to add another recode condition and say if it is less than negative two, and then that is also extreme. So I'll say yes. And then else says otherwise, just do this. Otherwise it's no. So that's simple. So I'm going to close that and now I've defined that transform function. And you can see that it's available now. There's extreme right there. And I'm going to use extreme, but it wants to know what variable it is I want to transform. That's why there's the question mark there. So I'm going to come right here and I'm going to choose z score. And once I do that, you see it fills in immediately where we have the nose and down here we have a z score of 2.097. That's greater than two. So it says yes, that's extreme. And this is a function that I could apply to other variables if they're on the same scale. And so it makes it easy to prepare a lot of variables, sometimes using rather complex functions, but rather quickly in a way that's easy to set up and easy to understand what's happening.


All right, thank you for inviting me. Thanks for participating in this event and in this debate and thank you all for coming. Let me just correct one thing about the description of my position. I am not for a minimal state. I am for a limited state and I think there is a big difference between a minimal state. I don't think this is an issue of size. I don't think it's an issue of how big the state is. This is purely an issue of whether there should be a state and then if there is a state what should it do? And I believe in a limited state, a state limited, a government limited to the protection of individual rights and that should be its only function and it should be of a size necessary for it to fulfill that function. When we think of living in a society, when we think of what happens when we come together in a social context, there are only two options. We can either live by the rule of gangs, we live by the rule of violence and force or we can live in a right-respecting government state. There are many options in between. We can have mixtures of them, we can have some gangs and some protection of rights, but the end of the day it extremes. There is a right-respecting government which I think is the appropriate way to live or there is gang warfare. Communism is gang warfare. It is one particular gang in the name of the proletarian inflicting its ideas on everybody else and monopolizing the use of violence over a region, but it's about violence. Nazism is a form of gang warfare. And I actually think anarchism is a form of gang warfare. Without the monopoly, but it is a system of legitimizing force that force is something to be traded in, force is something to be negotiated. It is a system that places might above right. Most societies today are a mixture of those two. We have elements of organized monopolistic coercion, the state regulating the state redistributing wealth and all of that. We have elements of relative freedom from coercion where the state is actually protecting our rights, protecting us from crooks and criminals and fraudsters, arbitrating disputes rationally and objectively. We don't have, in my view, in the world in which we live today, which is a mixture of these two extremes if you will. We even have today a form of anarchy within our societies. It's called the mafia. We have different groups of mafia. They interact with one another primarily through the use of force, although they sometimes have what we call treaties and arrangements on who gets the inflict violence against whom. Gangs in southern Los Angeles have very strong, you know, those kind of relationships where they inflict violence, but they also have agreements about this area. I sell drugs. Those area you sell drugs once in a while. We fight and we kill each other, but generally they have their own little governments within a new region in which the big government, the federal government does not protect rights. Those neighborhoods in LA are not, the government is not protecting rights. So to me, this issue of anarchy or, I don't know, stateless society, which I assume means no government, is on the same category as authoritarianism because it is a system of legitimizing force. Are you going to tell me how much time I have? Because I've lost track. Okay, so how much time do I have? I've only spoken for four minutes? Well, oh, I have four minutes left. Ten more minutes. Okay, cool. So that is, I consider anarchy a form of authoritarianism. And I think it's inevitable outcome, the inevitable outcome of any anarchy, the inevitable outcome of any system that places might above right is that that who has the most might wins, that who has the most might inflicts his ideology, his ideas, his power over everybody else. What's much more interesting to me is what a proper government looks like. And I think a proper government is necessary for human success, human flourishing, human production, human reason to be achieved. The fundamental, the fundamental means by which human beings survive, the fundamental means by which human beings thrive, the fundamental means by which we as human beings achieve success, including happiness is by the use of our reason, by the use of our mind. The enemy of the mind, the enemy of reason, and therefore the enemy of human life is force, coercion, authority. It is somebody else using violence against us. Violence is the enemy of thinking and therefore the enemy of human life. Therefore, to live in a society, to live in a community, to live together, which is an enormous value for human beings, there is an enormous value for us to be together, not to be isolated on desert islands. To live together, we must, we must extract violence from human interaction. One thing that is unacceptable is the use of force between individuals. One thing is unacceptable is to use coercion. Therefore, coercion, violence, force must be extracted from human society. That is why we form government. That is the role of government, to be the monopoly over the use of retaliatory force. What we don't want is individuals based on their whim, based on their emotion of the moment, based on their ideas, using force on other people because they think they somehow have been wronged. That use of force has to be placed under objective authority. It has to be placed in the, in the, the behest of that agency responsible for protecting our rights. Individual rights are the means by which we subjugate a society to moral law. It is the means by which we recognize the fact that an individual, individual has a right to his own life, is free, must live his life free from coercion, free from force. And the job of government is to protect that individual from criminals, mafias, gangsters, to protect that individual from the use of force against him. And to arbitrate disputes between us even when there's no criminal involved. Sometimes good, rational individuals disagree. And there has to be a mechanism by which that dispute is resolved without us having to go into the street to duel it out. Peaceful resolution of disagreement is an important function of government. But all of these functions are complicated. They're hard to figure out. What is violence? What counts as force and coercion? How should disputes be resolved? Where are rights being infringed? And how does one protect against the infringement of rights? All of those questions, procedures about discovering who is, who did what? What are the procedures of evidence? What are the procedures of courts? How do you determine the guilt of somebody or the innocence of somebody? Do you use a jury trial in that case? How does a jury trial proceed? The whole process of defending individual rights is a complex, complex process. It is not obvious. It is not simple. And it must be done objectively. It must be done based on ideas, based on rational ideas, not based on whim, not based on I'll do it my way, you do it your way. How do we, how do we resolve things if that is done? There has to be one ultimate authority that determines which way is right. What rules of evidence count? What rules of evidence don't count? What is legitimate? What is illegitimate when presenting facts? Or what are facts? How do we determine them? So the government's job is a complex one because it requires objectivity. It requires dedication to the facts of reality. But there is no way around it. Government is not a necessary evil as many menarchists would argue.  Without it, we cannot, we cannot peacefully plan long term, know what the clear rules and guidelines are for behavior, know where we violate somebody else's rights and where we don't. Without it, we have no certainty whether our actions are legitimate or illegitimate. Whether we're going to be prosecuted by some legal agency or not be prosecuted by a legal agency. Government is required in order to provide that objectivity which allows us to plan for the future, to think, to act and to pursue a life, liberty and happiness. So, government is a necessary good. Anything that undermines, undermines the legitimate function of government works against the individual, his rights and his ability to live a successful life. Now, the fact that governments today don't live up to the standard of what a good government should be is not a reason to abandon the idea of good government, the idea of individual rights. And to the extent that life in the world today is pretty good, to the extent that people do produce and build and create stuff is to the extent that governments are indeed protecting those realms in which we are acting, protecting our rights in those limited realms. The fight needs to be to properly define individual rights and to bring about governments that properly understand the limited role in only protecting those rights, to get governments to stop violating our rights, to stop adhering to the gangs who advocate for redistribution of wealth or advocate for regulating this industry versus that industry, to eliminate the rights violating aspects of government and secure the rights protecting aspects of government. Thank you. Thank you. What is the difference between objective and non-objective law and what are the consequences in society of each? That is one of the most important questions today. And objective law is a law which defines objectively what constitutes a crime or what is forbidden and the kind of penalties that a man would incur if he performs the forbidden action. Objective means definable, graspable by irrational consciousness. Therefore, an objective law would be a law which a man can understand and apply so that every man ahead of committing an action would be able to tell what is the crime forbidden, what penalty would he incur if he commits it and can make a decision accordingly. To be a law-abiding citizen he should be able to understand the law and apply it as guidance to his own social actions. Now, a non-objective law is one which cannot be defined. It means a law without specific definition which may have as many different interpretations as there are men. Under a non-objective law, a citizen cannot tell what is permitted or forbidden. He cannot tell what action is socially accepted, what action will be punished and what will be the nature of the punishment. A non-objective law is left strictly at the interpretation of the authorities, usually the judges and the dictatorships, it would be the commissars, but in any case a non-objective law is one which a man cannot interpret himself, a law that is not defined and is in fact undefinable. The best example of it is of course anti-trust legislation where a man cannot tell actually what is permitted to him or what is forbidden and may commit a legal crime without knowing that he's doing it. Mr. Ryan, a very popular legal doctrine holds that law is actually what the judges say it is and that legislative enactments are only sources of the law which the judges use to derive what they believe the law is. Do you believe this is a primary cause of the present state of non-objective law? It's not the primary cause, it's one of the manifestations. I believe if I'm not mistaken it was Justice Holmes, Oliver Wendell Holmes who originated that doctrine. He was the worst philosophical influence on American law. That is a statement of pure non-objectivities, is the formula for tyranny, because if the laws are whatever the judges interpret, I don't see the purpose of having any laws at all. It simply means that whatever the judges or the authorities decide at any given moment will determine what happens to the citizens of a country. It is not a formulation of law, it's the destruction, the negation of the concept of law.


at here. So the first thing, the first couple of things, one is that we at the Hyperledger community work with the Linux Foundation Rules, one of which is, of course, antitrust policy. We go by the antitrust policy. The other is the Code of Conduct, which says that even when you disagree with people, you are not disagreeable. These are the two operating principles. Other than that, we are completely open. Everybody's welcome. And that is the message of this group. So I had prepared a short set of slides to guide our conversation today, but I'm more interested in hearing from people about what they would like to see here in this group in the coming year. We have had some fantastic presentations last year, so I'll go over some of them just to remind everyone what we started and what we had here last year. The other thing I want to say is that Miguel has raised his hand, so I'm going to let him speak. And anyone can interrupt at any point. That is the other. Oh, I'm breaking up. Okay, sorry. Yeah, I thought maybe it was just me, but you've been kind of cutting it out. Maybe because I'm turning my head away from my webcam. I don't know. Or maybe it's my internet connection, which is probably choppy. So based on all this dust, maybe we should go down the list and ask people to speak because if my internet is bad, it's not a good thing that you won't be able to hear me anyway. So it might be better for other people to speak. So I see that David is here. David Boswell, who is a community architect in Hyperledger. So one of the themes of this meeting is how to present what we already have, the resources that we already have to others. Okay, so that's. Hey, I heard you mentioned my name, so just to introduce myself quickly. Hey, everybody. My name is David Boswell. As we've been said, I'm a staff member at Hyperledger. I just wanted to dial in and hear what the group was planning for the year. And again, just to see if I could support it. Now, I didn't hear everything you said because you are chopping up a little bit, so I don't know if there is a specific question for me or not. I'm happy to answer it. Well, one of the things that came up is how can we better present our materials to the group? Okay, yeah, I caught half of that. I'm sorry, I'm just not hearing. Maybe if we type in chat or something, I can respond. Okay, so the question, please let me know how we can share our resources. So is this share our resources within the group or more broadly to the whole community? Because I think there might be different strategies for both. So just by the way, I don't know if my audio is coming through or not, so if people are having a problem hearing me, let me know. Okay. So for broadly, one thing that we've been talking about recently is making better use of some of our channels. So for example, last year, we were experimenting with live streaming virtual hyperledger meetups, and that's actually been really effective. It's, excuse me, that's something that might help. It's helped us connect with more people. The YouTube platform is our YouTube channel is growing pretty quickly. We have over 12,000 subscribers and we've seen, for example, live streaming a presentation helps connect with a lot more people, like up to 20 more people at a time, you know, in real time, see the presentation there. So we're playing around with, you know, how do we roll that out more broadly? Again, it started off with virtual meetups. Now we're looking at doing presentations that SIGs are doing. So anyway, that's a thought that's just come up in recent discussions. As far as sharing within the group, I have to admit, I'm not that familiar with what's been done within the identity working group in the past. I mean, if there was, you know, if somebody, you know, wanted to share what the strategy was in 2020, I'm happy to, you know, talk through, you know, maybe ways that we could, you know, tweak it or take some best practices from other groups. Like I said, I was here just kind of learn more. You know, I admit that I don't know a ton about what the group has been doing. And I see somebody else is asking, yeah, maybe if we're talking about, you know, a 2021 strategy for the group, maybe wrapping up or maybe starting with, you know, a wrap up of 2020 activities and strategy could be useful. I see that Michael also asked for that in the chat. Yeah, I'm not hearing any talk right now. I see some chat. I don't know, is anybody able to maybe do a recap? Hey, David, it shows you being on mute, my friend. Yeah, I was just saying that I, you know, I was, it seems like it would be helpful for me and maybe some other people in chat too are asking for maybe a recap of both what the group has done in 2020 as well as maybe a recap of the charter. Like I said, I don't have a lot of history of the group. So it's hard for me to make recommendations about maybe things to do differently. And I see other people in chat are saying a little bit of history would be helpful too. I don't know, maybe we lost Fippin. Yeah, I think he's having some audio problems. Yeah, yeah. Does somebody else have some of that history of the groups they want to share? Can you hear me at all or no? A little bit. I mean, at all, yes. Yeah, it seemed like it chopped a little bit, but I heard, I wasn't hearing you for a second, but yeah, I'm hearing you now. Okay, I'm going to make sure that that link is good off that presentation. And then I'll also put in the chat, in the chat, the link to the identity working group Wiki. Are people able to hear me or no? Still no. It's really cutting in and out. I hear you some. Okay, sorry. Well, some. All right, I'm going to put in the chat. Maybe I'll share my screen and I'll run through it what I can. Yeah, this isn't really working. Yeah, I understand. All right, presentation link I sent. I'm going to start sharing the screen. If you can hear me, it's great. Otherwise, we take it from there. The charter has the material. Otherwise, you know, we call it a day for me anyway, and you guys can continue. I wasn't expecting this. Yeah, and Vivin, if it's helpful for me to show up at another call to talk through maybe 2021 plans. Yeah. Sorry, that didn't mean to interrupt. You know, so I can try to share the screen and work through it, but I don't know whether it's going to. So can you guys see my screen at all? Yeah, I see your screen. Yeah, we can. Okay, so it's basically, you know, this thing is for everybody for you to be participating rather than anybody else. So I think it would help if people go through this, go through why they're here. And some of you have participated in this quite extensively. So it might be better because then you can talk about what you have taken away from this group and what we can share. So should I be calling on people or how does this work? I'll be happy to pipe up. Jim St. Clair, first time coming to the meeting. I'm active with Dan in TOIP as well as several of the Diff working groups, and I've been making an effort for 2021 to get more into the hyperledger SEGs and working groups as well. I'm from LeMedic. Our focus is patient-centric identity management and part of Providence Health Systems in Seattle. Let's go down the list, if we can. So can jump in, I guess. My name is Chris Patronakis. I am a postdoctoral researcher at SIRT, which is Greece's largest research institute. I'm representing the Pharma Ledger Horizon 2020 project, in which we are leading the technical efforts for identity management, and we are looking towards the technical solutions of artists to business. My name is Roland Forre. I'm the CEO of the company Small Business IOC. We are working on hyperledger ND and hyperledger areas on supply chain environment related to other goods and the identity. I'm Michael Hermione. I'm a self-sovereign blockchain architect. I live on a cattle ranch in Alberta, Canada. My project is the Trusted Digital Web. I've been around the whole SSI decentralized identity thing for about three years now. Time to time I get very deep in terms of my contributions and times like today I'm just working around. I've just recently published a white paper called SSI Public Data Usage Licensing that may be of interest to this group. Public Data Usage Licensing. I'll drop a link in the chat. Thank you. So what are the themes of that particular paper? So the overarching scenario in general when you know from the early days of SSI and I go back to Joe, I forget, Joe A's. He had some principles of SSI, but there's a whole idea that you would present your identity that you'd have your own self-sovereign identity and that you would present that identity to a website or to an application and that you would control how your identity is used, how the identifier is used, how that application could attach identity. There's kind of this nirvana scenario, but I've never seen anybody actually act on it. So this white paper talks about how Alice, a user, might present a personal data usage license to an application in terms of what she's choosing to selectively disclose to that application and then in turn the white paper looks from the application side. Bob's app will have a set of roles that's also defined by a similar set of claims in terms of personal information it needs and depending on what Alice is willing to disclose, she is able to have certain roles within Bob's application and vice versa. It's a little bit long, the white paper, but it's an easy read. Great. I've seen your name and your contributions because I am a lurker. The other thing I'll pitch because it's very top of mind is I'm investigating a file format, a serialization format for verified credentials. And it's kind of related to this idea of how do you present your identity or how do you present a credential to another application. Yeah, and so there's an active discussion going on in the CCG mailing list. I can post a link there. Thank you. Yeah, like I said, I'm a lurker on the CCG mailing list. You can hear me better now, I hope. Yeah, we can, yeah. Yeah, because I did reconnect. So hopefully that makes things easier and better. Yeah, that's a lot better. So Stefan, I think you should go because you made a presentation or two, especially from the European perspective. And I'll go back to the slides to show the various places that we have had these presentations. But Stefan, please. Okay. So my name is Stefan Mui. I'm a financial consultant working for the Digital Transition Matters. I've experienced in my background. It's certainly in compliance and legal issues for the banking sector. I'm currently working on identity proofing, well, remote identity proofing specifications for the Etsy standardization organization. In fact, we just released a couple of a few weeks ago a draft to that effect. I'm also working on a new assignment for the European Commission on KYC Portability, which is not directly related to, I would say, decentralized or SSI schemes, but certainly is somehow related to that topic as well. And that's something I've been involved with the European Commission work for on that theme, wider theme for a couple of years. And this is relevant because you may know that there's work I'm doing currently to revise the EIS framework and make it more consistent with the latest trends in the identity arena. Beautiful. Alfonso. Hi, thank you for everything. Hi, everyone. I'm Alfonso Grobella from Merida, Mexico. I came to this group interested in IoT for smart cities, in particular solar panels. And then I became quite interested in SSI, still learning. I am part of the Hyperledger new Latin American chapter and a co-chair of the learning materials and development working group here also at Hyperledger. Happy to be with you learning every day. That's a spirit. Dan Bachenheimer, who's of course been a stalwart contributor to this group, and he has made a presentation last year, which I call out in my slides. Anyway, Dan, please go ahead and talk about your interest and what we should be doing going forward. You know, that is the key theme of this meeting. Are you around, Dan, or...  Gary DiGrucio. Basically, I saw that you just joined and we are just going down the list of participants talking about what we should be working on for the next year. And I had a presentation ready, but I had some audio problems. Looks like the audio problems have gone away, but basically, what are you working on? That kind of thing. So, actually, I've been on something of a hiatus since the summer. I'm actually just getting back into participating with the group, so I'm still trying to come up to speed on what's going on. Oh, beautiful. Okay. Jim is already gone. Alfonso, David, Chris. Now, Luca Boldrin, who's another person who has contributed to this group. Yes. Hi, everyone. My background is on certification authority and PKI stuff. My company is mostly trust service provider in the hiatus framework. But we are working since a few years, at least, five years, of course. In the self-sovereign environment, we are developing from there. We're very much connected to the hiatus world, which Stefan mentioned before. And we are now looking forward to what's happening with the new mood of integrating identity with payment systems with the concept of central bank digital currencies and the like. I'm fond of this group and I try to attend, even if I can't make it very regularly, because of the diversity of the amount of different topics which are addressed in quite transversal with respect to other fora. So thanks, Deepin, for keeping me down. All right. The next person, I think it's Charles. No. Anyway, I think everybody is gone, so gone over why they're here. So I'm going to try to go over the slides that I had prepared. It looks like I'm in a better shape now. So the roadmap slides. The first call that we had, not the first, but one of the first calls that we had was with Kim Cameron, who's a legend, obviously. But his main theme was how people are, the personal digital transformation is happening and how that is, you know, it is a process. It is not something that is going to happen like the crack of a whip. It is going to happen slowly. And he's had, you know, his views are also in that slide, and that slide will be, you know, this slide has links to all of the recordings that we have had. And then we had a talk about the data protection regulation. Stefan mentioned some about Europe. We also had people from India talking about it. And in one of the slides, following slides, I will show how things have changed between 2019 and 2020. Then the next one is Dan's known traveler digital identity, which has all these elements in play, which is, you know, the serialization format, the semantics, the way in which these things can be presented and so on. Then we had several sessions on contact tracing and anonymization in the first days of the pandemic. And people were kind of upset saying, you know, what does this have to do with identity? But slowly looks like more and more people are drawn into this. And there is a whole session today at WHO, like Jim mentioned, vaccines, credentials, initiative or smart vaccines or whatever it's called today. And European, this is the next one which Stefan talked about. And one of the main things that happened last year was, of course, the creation of TOIP, the new group in the next foundation. Then we had a presentation on cactus with identity focus, also a presentation from the Global Legal Entity Foundation with roles in the enterprise. Another one was the universal wallet concept, which also had a very interesting presentation. Then vaccinations and COVID credentials, then MPC securing the enterprise using unbounce technology, then on consent management's semantic working group from TOIP. Now there's three groups in TOIP dealing with semantics. Well, I should probably not say TOIP, I should say TOIP because Jim Jordan is very particular about that. And the state of SSI, which had a membership of 65 people in this call that was given by Drummond, and he's going to come back next month. Then biometrics, which is a big topic, and how does biometrics coexist with SSI? And Cary, which is a digital key management solution that is top of the mind for everyone today. Two things that I want to say is that somebody had asked what is the charter of the group? The charter was to talk about all identity problems in or identity solutions in a hyperledger. And we have to say that identity is one of the foundational concepts in blockchains. Many of these talks have nothing to do with DLTs or blockchain directly. But in the end, they all come back to the idea of a global witness, which even in SSI uses some form of DLT. This is just a screen showing the comprehensive data protection laws in 2019. And I just wanted to show you the transformation that happened and looks like China started out a new law for data protection of its citizens. But I do not know how effective that will be because the government is engaged in surveillance according to many. We have no real idea. The other place that things changed was in Egypt. In Africa, there are some places where the privacy laws are being enacted. In the United States, as you know, that kind of a comprehensive privacy law is not there, and it probably will never be enacted because there's a very strong pushback against that kind of a situation. Although in country, it is a federated system, so there's lots of different ways in which the laws can be enacted. Jim, you have something to say? Oh, you just touched upon it, but I was going to comment in general that number one, the HIPAA privacy law is going through a notice of proposed rulemaking, which will probably expand the context around patient consent and patient access. And to your last point, obviously, California already has the CCPA. They're going to the CPRA, and there's about, according to the legal newsletters I follow, about 14 states. So it wouldn't surprise me if the Biden administration started looking at something federal that would harmonize privacy laws because the problem is probably going to come up that different states have different laws that mimic GDPR or have similarities to it, which will make it too hard to operate without federal guidance. Yeah, I think GDPR was a very important law because of the fact that it is not only protecting European citizens, it is protecting citizens elsewhere. Because of the way the law is enacted, most global companies have to comply with the law, which means that they enact similar laws, I mean similar protections, even in the countries that do not have such a law. I don't know what the Canadian situation is because here in this map, it shows that Canada is blue, which is a comprehensive data protection law has been enacted. I don't know too much about it, and the whole of South America seems like it's got some solid protections the Russians have, and so does Australia. So in order to comply with all of these, obviously the move is towards giving the data back, control back to the citizens. And so to recap, some of the things that we talked about here, one of them is the make the material accessible and searchable, which was the first point I opened with, although I couldn't be heard. We have a paper that is about identity and blockchains, and it has been stalled for a couple of years now, because we felt like the landscape was changing so rapidly that we did not have a way to keep up with it. So things looks like things are shaking out, and there's more clarity. I think the whole point that a personal digital transformation is underway, where people who are even so-called digital natives are slowly realizing the deleterious, the bad effects of over-sharing and the lack of protection. So it is not just the older people who are used to a more personal data protection, but also everyone else. And I think that that's what Jim was talking about, that he was talking about specifically about the healthcare system, but unless there's a comprehensive law that protects everything from financial transactions to healthcare, to various other forms of data gathering and misuse. Of course, that goes directly to this whole vaccines credentials and interoperability situation with the smart vaccine certification certificate. And we also work with the Digital Identity Foundation. Dan, you had something to say, please. Well, yeah, to your previous point, yeah, you mentioned biometrics before in the same thing as what Jim was talking about with health credentials. We see a lot of federal and state in the US and other countries banning the use of biometrics for various reasons. And yet GDPR, as you were saying before, covers that as not just personal data, but sensitive personal data, just like health. So I just was bringing that up in the context of what you're talking about in terms of comprehensive laws to protect all PII, including health, including biometrics and others. But that was it. Yeah, but since you are the biometrics czar of this group, I would ask you to say, what are the prospects? Because the problem is, it's two-edged, right? One is biometrics are seen as a kind of a nuclear option, meaning if you lose that and if somebody can spoof that, then they really can't take over somebody's identity. On the other hand, that is linking someone very definitively with their biometrics. So you have the two sides of the same of this coin. And I'm wondering whether you can say something more about what's happening there. Yeah, you kind of said it, but when we talk about health credentials and identity credentials, right now the US CDC provides you the little white card that sometimes they actually fill in your name, first name and last name, and then it would say the date and what vaccination you got. But it's not bound to an identity. Even if they filled in my name, it's still not bound to an identity. Now, there's all this activity, as you're saying, like the WHO is doing today. Now, we do have folks representing this, but in general, the other health credential activities that we see out there in the news, they really either don't think of identity or think of it in passing, of how you bind the identity, both when you are at the lab getting a test or getting a vaccination, how do they identify you? So that when you then get something associated with you, perhaps it's you, and then you go and travel and present that vaccination or that test result, how do they know that it was provisioned to that person? And not their brother or not somebody that they paid to take the test for them. And one of the most secure ways of doing that is through biometrics to bind an identity claim, including a health credential, to the presenter of that claim. Now, then you talk about the ability to potentially spoof a biometric. There is that potential. In ISO world, we published 30107-3 that talks about presentation attack detection. And there's algorithms, techniques to detect presentation attacks in face, finger, iris, voice. Is it foolproof? No, but there are methods to detect it. Anybody that says anti-spoof, I discount right away because you can detect spoof, you can't have software to not have somebody attempt to spoof you. They will attempt, and the best you can do is detect it. Anyhow, there's movements of more privacy enhancing biometrics that do matching in the hash domain. And we'll see more about that. You're giving up a bit of performance accuracy in that case to get more privacy. And in some cases, that's going to be acceptable, especially in humanitarian cases. Launching nuclear codes, you probably don't want to lose performance in terms of accuracy or border crossing, but there's other things that low financial risk transactions could use that. Anyhow, happy to answer any questions, but that's a quick brain dump. Yeah, I mean, you know that we had that presentation just a couple of weeks ago on biometrics and SSI. I think that the carry thing there is sort of not correct there, but I wanted you to have that separate. But anyway, going back to the biometrics and SSI, is the use of biometrics and SSI contradictory or? No, not at all. Not at all, right? And KVTI, you mentioned that before. KVTI.org, go and watch the little video, read up about it. But basically, it's another, your biometric identifier is another verifiable claim where packaged into a verifiable credential that to have that seamless travel experience, I selectively disclose certain information, let's say, to my airline. We selectively disclose it to the departure boarder agency, the rival boarder agency, the security agency, maybe my car rental agency, but let's focus on my airline. So I have as an attestation, my wallet, my boarding pass information, and my passport information, including my biometric, the only biometric that's required in all a KO 9303 documents, the e-passport and data group two is an ISO compliant photo. So that is a biometric, it is included in a verifiable credential called an e-passport today. We have the same thing in KVTI. So what is that by me? I could share selectively disclose ahead of time my boarding pass information and some of my basically passport information, my photo, my first name, last name. I share that with my airline. Now I'm getting ready to board this A380, you know, 525 people. I don't have to take out my boarding pass, my passport. I walk up to the boarding gate. It captures my face. It does a 1 to 528 to 525, I guess, search. It says, oh, yeah, that's, I recognize his face. It is Dan. I've updated my manifest that he's biometrically bored. I have a more accurate manifest. And that's an example using biometrics in SSI. Now where GDPR comes into play is I and 525 other people shared my sensitive personal data with that airline. They have to protect it. They have to tell me how long they're going to use it. How are they going to protect it? When are they going to delete it typically within 24 hours?  So GDPR does apply, maybe not to my, you know, to my, or maybe differently to my wallet than it does to the airline, because now the airline has, at least for a certain amount of time, PII, including biometric information for a bunch of folks. Yeah, I mean, you mentioned two things which I think is important, which are important. One is, I do, I do believe, I do not believe, I subscribe to the notion that Ian Grig said, and which, which makes sense, which is basically identity is an edge protocol. That means that the more nodes, the more things that attest to my identity, the more difficult it is to spoof that identity. Because there are, let's say, if you use a palm veins or a gate along with something else, then it is pretty sure that, you know, I am the person who I say I am. Of course, the other other part is, you know, the presentation, you know, the what is, what is needed in order to identity proof. This is what Stefan was talking about, which, of course, the NIST also goes into great detail about what is needed for identity proofing, which, of course, makes it legal to use multiple methods and strengthen your proof, you know. So it's very difficult to spoof somebody if you're using multiple methods that are different domains, including biometrics. But in the end, biometrics, we spoke about this briefly, which is do you store that information directly in the, you know, in some kind of a data space, or you store a hash-based sort of a matching pattern that cannot be reversed. And you said that for recoverability, sometimes that data is stored. But with all the stuff that has been happening in terms of people breaking in into all the honeypots, all the different places where data is being stored and being able to get that data out, the movement towards personal digital transformation that Kim Cameron was mentioning is leading to decentralization, leading to ways of storing data on the edges in a way that can be one recovered to revoked and presented. And since decentralization would prevent a large-scale thievery of this data, then that's even better. So the next thing here, you know, which is financial use cases. So these are the themes for 2021, and people will be showing up and talking about some of these. The financial use cases for digital currencies, I've mentioned because I'm involved with the digital currency global initiative, and I had forwarded that to the identity working group and the capital markets working group so that people can participate directly in that and digital currencies as you know are our hot item right now, especially with cryptocurrencies and everything else going haywire. But this is about developing standards for digital currency interoperation, and I believe that identity is one of the pivot points for that. Going down the list, we have capabilities versus access control links, which, you know, I have linked to that paper that actually is W3C, I believe was who have hosted that, and we want to talk about that. The last item solid is Sir Tim Berners Lee's effort for having pods. So we'll talk about that, and also about Kerry as a DKMS. And obviously, a lot of this work is already going on in, you know, different places, but we want to, you know, we want to talk about it in the context of hyper ledger. So the one of the last things I would say is that there's a hyper ledger global forum happening, and if you have any ideas for a paper for presentation, please present it to the program committee, and hopefully they will choose your paper. And I will send out that information as well on the mailing list. I think that's about it for now, and I hope this has been useful, even though I started out with a bit of a problem with the audio. Anyone else has anything to say, including David?  Yeah, thank you. It was helpful to hear more about things that have happened and things you're planning, for example, that paper. Again, if there are ways that this group is wanting support, you can reach out to me. We've done, we have published a couple of papers, for example, for some specialist groups. So, you know, there's a process we could follow. I know some other working groups of published papers as well. But anyway, thanks for letting me listen in and, you know, let me feel free to reach out if there are ways I can help what you're wanting to do this year. Yeah, thank you. Thank you. Bye. Bye. Thank you. Bye.


What's good Josh the boros back again with another video so once again Roman Reigns has the best segment on Smackdown per usual He was basically getting into it with Adam Pierce per usual About what's happening at Elimination Chamber. I like that. He addressed Edge basically calling out it's and it's didn't want to smoke He was scared like I like how he's just Boasting up his heel persona like Edge don't want these problems. He doesn't want to mess with me. He knows what's up So I like that he brought that up Then Adam Pierce is basically giving the stipulations what's gonna happen at the Elimination Chamber and Roman Reigns is not having it. He's the guy that pretty much runs things in WWE the way they presented it presented himself now like he chooses when he wants to have the matches in At what time, you know, I like him just really Going with this notion like I'm the number one guy so I get to choose and do what I want to pretty much Basically originally he was going to be in Elimination Chamber But Paul Heyman was like no he will be at Elimination Chamber He will defend his championship at Elimination Chamber And whoever wins on the Smackdown side of the Elimination Chamber match Will be able to face Roman Reigns right after which I find to be Just hilarious.  So I think it was the next pay-per-view after summer slam correcting correct me if I'm wrong We're basically He was gonna be in the match between the Fiend and Braun Strowman He was going to be in the match, but he didn't show up to the very end of the match and then that's how he Gained the Universal Championship. So comment down below. Let me know what pay-per-view that was. I honestly forgot but Yeah, man, I'm liking this a He'll doing heel tactic things. I'm all for it Roman Reigns best thing on WWE television as it stands I love what he brings to Smackdown I do like the fact that Adam Pierce also said Jey Uso is gonna be involved and Kevin Owens and from I think I want to say I've seen like some of the Like the promo promo art or you know the promo card for the match. I believe Daniel Bryan is also in the match I'm not sure who else is in the match so comment down below. Let me know as well But this opens up storylines because I honestly think Kevin Owens is cool But I think this storyline is it's met his course. So I would love to see if Daniel Bryan I believe he's in the match wins the elimination chamber and He faces Roman Reigns even though he's gonna be tired I want to see how they're gonna drag this to WrestleMania because I'm pretty sure they're they're gonna find a way to get Somebody that won the elimination chamber match to possibly end up feuding with Roman Reigns or maybe Edge chooses Roman Reigns Who knows this is this is probably the get the best part of WrestleMania season is finding out who the Royal rumble winners going to face and this is probably one of the better times only because We have Roman Reigns as one of the best heels We have seen in the company in a long time, man So comment down below. Let me know what your thoughts and opinions who y'all think is gonna win the elimination chamber match On the smackdown side of things and and let me know if you guys are still enjoying this awesome He'll run by Roman Reigns because I know I am but I appreciate all the love and support wrote to 40k, I appreciate y'all kicking with me. I'll see y'all in the next one. Peace


Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States. Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to present first the chairman of our task force on the matter that brings us here today, Lois Harrington. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President, Mr. Meese and all the rest. Today the President is creating a task force to study the problems of those who are victimized by crime. He is doing so because of his deep concern for these often forgotten citizens. We give a great deal of attention to those who break the law, but the system often neglects those whose harm forms the very basis for the system's existence. This President wants to end that neglect. He cares about the problems of victims. Proclaiming victims weak and creating this task force are certainly signs of the priority he has placed on meeting their needs. Crime is a problem of major concern in America. We confront a situation in which people are afraid to be on the streets and they are afraid in their homes where they expect to feel safe. The problems of crime and the victims left in its wake exist in every community and cut across every age, ethnic and economic line. We must find a practical, effective and humane way to deal with this crippling problem. It is clearly one which has many dimensions and which must be addressed in many different perspectives. It will be the focus of this task force to study the problems of the victims. These victims include the most vulnerable and the least able to help themselves. The elderly, our children, the handicapped, they include the frightened, the homeowner who feels his home not to be a safe haven, the teacher and the student who find their schools unsafe, the owner of the small business such as a small grocery store who is such a target for the armed robbers. They include those trapped and without options living in the most dangerous areas of our cities. We will also consider the manner in which society itself is victimized. The changes this threat has forced on the way we live our lives and the hidden costs and everything we buy imposed to cover theft and the protection against it. After looking at these and a variety of other areas we will prepare a report outlining the scope of the problems we find as well as those solutions which public and private institutions can provide. And in conducting our investigation we will of course speak to all those in the system, the judges and the attorneys, the police, probation correction officers, but mostly we want to hear from those who are our chief concern the victims of the crime. Determining how best to deal with the victims and helping them through the first shock of the attack, protecting and guiding them through an often impersonal and threatening court system, ensuring that they have a chance to be heard and helping to ensure they won't be harmed again as an enormous task and enormous challenge. We may not be able to prevent this from being a country in which the innocent are victimized, but we can reduce the number of victims and ensure that those victims who remain are treated with care and concern. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. What as Lois has just told us, the innocent victims of crime have frequently been overlooked by our criminal justice system and they're pleased for justice have gone unheeded and their wounds, personal, emotional and financial have gone unattended. So I'm signing today an executive order establishing the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime. This task force which will involve both government officials and distinguished private citizens will conduct a thorough review of national, state and local policies and programs that affect victims of crime. It will report later this year to me and to the Attorney General on how we can expand and improve our efforts at all levels of government to assist and protect our fellow citizens who are victimized by lawlessness. I think it is especially appropriate that this task force is being established during Crime Victims Week. In proclaiming Crime Victims Week, I stated that our commitment to criminal justice goes far deeper than our desire to punish the guilty or to deter those considering a lawless course. Our laws represent the collective moral voice of a free society, a voice that articulates our shared beliefs about the rules of civilized behavior. Both the observance of Crime Victims Week and the creation of this task force are entirely consistent with principles that lie at the heart of our nation's belief in freedom under law. Those principles will lose their meaning and our citizens will lose faith in them if we concentrate solely on punishing criminals and ignore the suffering of those upon whom the criminals pray. They should not be treated as ciphers on a statistician's chart.  Our concern for Crime Victims rests on far more than simple recognition that it could happen to any of us. It's also rooted in the realization that regardless of who is victimized or the extent to which any one of us may personally be threatened, all of us have an interest in seeing that justice is done not only to the criminal but also for those who suffer the consequences of his crime. In creating this task force, I have no naive or polyana view of the scope of the problem that we face or the ease with which sound practical solutions can be developed and put into practice. But I am convinced both that we should and that we can achieve more than has been accomplished in the past. This problem causes personal hardships that those who have not suffered directly at the hands of criminals can scarcely imagine. It merits our most serious attention. Moving closer to a solution will demand the best coordinated efforts of concerned private citizens and of responsible public officials at the federal, state, and local levels. The task force is intended to help bring that about. The Constitution that I am sworn to uphold speaks in its first sentence of the importance of ensuring domestic tranquility for our citizens. Consistent with that responsibility, I am committed to elevating and improving our efforts on behalf of victims of crime. This task force is designed not simply to demonstrate our concern but to make a swift, serious, and substantial contribution to solving the problem. I know that its members under the chairmanship of Lois Harrington will meet the challenge. I would only emphasize as they begin their task that all of us in the administration stand behind them eager to contribute and assist in any way. And now I shall sign the executive order. I'm going to see Francis Kim today, the board secretary, sir. Nice day. We'll talk about that later.


Hi everybody, Joe for jaspeescasewrakes.com. Looks like this is our last box of 2022 Panini National Treasures FIFA World Road to World Cup soccer, one box picker team number 21. There may be a chance we may get another case or two of this in the near future, so just keep an eye on it. World Cup coming up. Gosh, we're already tomorrow's November. It's crazy, just a few weeks. We need to tad less. Big thanks to this group for buying their team straight up, I appreciate that. Here on Monday the 31st, happy Halloween everybody. Alex did that last bottom mojo, and we pulled a few teams out for that number block, and we did that randomizer in a separate video, but there are the results right there. So it's a serial number break that only applies to those three teams right there. That's my side over here. All right, let's see what we got inside over there. Center of my camera a little bit here. Good luck everybody. All right, all right, all right. There's the stack of cards right here. We'll use this blank card to slow play some of the hits. Here it is, 37 out of 99, Hyun Min Sung. That'll go to Korea. And Soon Hwan, there you go. Next up is Julian Alvarez, 29 out of 99. Rookie card for Argentina, that'll be for Wen Chun, with Argentina here in Hermosa Beach, who's in charge of shoveling the Jasky Park and offer snow. Yeah, we got a guy. We got the snow guy that comes here and takes care of all that. Next up, Luis Sinistero, 13 out of 99 for Colombia. That'll be for Daniel. 74 out of 99, Diogo Dalot for Portugal. Triple relic for Alex, last bottom mojo. All right, I drive the plow, right? Fully licensed, fully licensed, Terry. Next is two out of 99, that's Ridel Baku for Germany. Daniel, with the Germans. Five out of 10, Romelo Lukaku for Belgium, David. Right, we melt the snow with all the heat that we pull. That's right, Gilo. That is what we do.  We've got La Taro Martinez for Argentina. 30 out of 99. Has ever snowed during a soccer match? Yeah, many times. It's Wen Shun with Argentina and they play on. I think they kind of do it like American football where they'll like shovel, they'll shovel like all the outlines of the lines that are out there. And sometimes they'll get fans to like shovel like the stands and stuff like that. 20 out of 49 for Belgium. Dennis Praet, Jersey and autograph. It's another one for David. Next up is Gilberto Silva. National Archiving, 46 out of 99. Brazil, that's a number block team. And so if you're not familiar, we go by that digit right there. So it goes to number six. And that will be for, there you go, Brian Heyman. There you go, Brian, number six, Brazil. And the last one here is, whoo, what a way to end it. CR seven himself, Cristiano Ronaldo. And his autograph on card autograph, seven out of 10. Jersey number, man.  That is on, you know, this might be his last World Cup.  He just has to play well. That's awesome. Alex, congrats to you. And that's that ladies and gentlemen. I'm Joe for jaspeyscasebreaks.com. Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us. I'll see you next time for the next soccer break. Bye bye.