Timing continues to be everything. I was literally just having a conversation with my guy Josh H yesterday about this We did a live stream last night and we brought it up there, too And it's been a conversation. It's not like it's been a secret that Ravens have been interested in bringing back one per nail McPhee But a lot of us have just been waiting and almost expecting this move to happen Now, of course, there are a lot of other dominoes that were out there as far as edge setters and more past rushes that the Ravens could add via free agency One of the biggest names. I don't know what I have this hood on one of the biggest names that was out there Not even Judevian Clowney because you're Davian Clowney While Ravens could sign him it would take a lot to do that and they would have to resend one to bring it No, that just that just probably wasn't gonna happen But one of the biggest names besides the Judevian Clowney that's out there was one clay Matthews and For if some strange thing for some odd reason if it didn't go down with per nail McPhee Then clay Matthews would have been the next man up that I would have expected the Ravens to make a move on but bringing back per nail McPhee it makes sense it makes sense and This will be one of those situations where it's third times the charm Third time is the charm city, right? But anyway, this will be his third stint with the Ravens because he was obviously drafted back When was he drafted? He was drafting the fifth round. I forgot what she it which year And then he went on to go with the bears and then he joined the redskins and whatnot and while he didn't rack up a Bunch of sacks or whatnot. He did get precious and he did set the edge well, too And that's the same thing that he did when he is here Even last year, but the only reason that they didn't work out for him last year was because he got hurt he got hurt and He was showing Jaylen Ferguson the ropes being a good example for him and he was one of the team leaders too, but He got hurt and then again Jaylen Ferguson He had to be thrown into the fire a lot earlier than he and a lot of us anticipated him being thrown into the fire But one good thing about that is that he that was on-the-job training It was little on-the-job training because he didn't get to shadow somebody. He didn't get to sit back and oh, okay That's how you do it. Oh, okay. Okay. That's okay. I like that I appreciate that. No, he had to be thrown in early because of the situation But now with pernell McPhee coming back This was probably one of the best moves that the Ravens could have made it's probably one of the best moves they could have made and it It's not obvious. It's not a sexy move and actually it kind of is though. It kind of is Because with pernell McPhee again setting that edge He was missed dearly throughout the season after he got hurt. He was missed dearly Providing pressure. He's somebody that can provide both exterior and interior pressure They can move them around and again Ravens what they've been doing this offseason They've been getting guys that they can move around again wink is like Wink is probably drooling. He probably is man like oh, I cannot wait for this season to start I got some stuff up my sleeve He you know, he can't wait man But the Ravens are getting guys that can move around on that defensive line They're trying to get more active on that defensive line trying to create more pressure From the defensive line because that was a problem rushing for Ravens would get nothing Nothing No pressure whatsoever They are trying to create a situation to where yeah, of course, they're gonna have their times when they rush five six seven You know wink he gonna rush all 11 on someplace but They want to create a situation to where they don't always have to send so many people You know wink don't mind Blitzen now, you know, he don't mind Blitzen But they wanted to where they don't have to bring so many people just to get pressure to where they can create pressure from right there so This is gonna be fun and again guys that can move around and do different things Pernel McPhee, he can move around Kaleas Campbell. He can move around Derek Wolf. He can move around Justin Madibouke the rookie He can move around So this is what they need it makes sense it makes sense it makes a lot of sense So with Pernel McPhee coming back I'm happy about this movement. This is a move that that I really like and um It's actually a little more exciting than I even thought it would be like initially when I first heard And when we first heard months ago that they were interested in bringing back Pernel McPhee It was like, okay, cool. I could understand why But I think after having gone through free agency having gone through the draft and everything and really seeing everything that the Ravens Have done to address this team and again shout out to my god JT remember the Titans remember the Titans Ravens remember I remember y'all remember Pepperidge farm remembers too But we all remember the Titans and that game just is stood out so much And it obviously haven't had a big impact on the Ravens like we continue to talk about Because this entire offseason they've been addressing that game They've been addressing it. It's like they they've been it's funny because it's not only that game But they've they've been addressing All the games that they lost this last season they've been addressing those games throughout this offseason Who they lose who last season they lost to the Titans That's the most recent loss in the biggest one too playoff game. What happened there. Can we ran all over him? He them out them outside runs and runs it on the edge. Nobody could contain on the why they could stop him What they do they got more physical linebackers. They got faster linebackers that could cover more They got linebackers that just in case running back goes to the edge and he's running to the outside You got linebackers with some speed that can catch them. What else do we do? Well speaking of the edge We couldn't set it Titans did Titans took it up. They took it over So we got a Kaleas Campbell We got a Derek Wolf. We got guys that are good and run support and can provide some pressure too Then they bring back Panel McPhee So that takes care of that game and then also obviously that game we had We had her some receivers now. Yeah, we had some receivers, but those receivers Most of our receivers in that game. They look like cornerbacks because they would just swatting footballs down all game So what did Ravens do the tour the two receivers that they drafted The two receivers that they drafted are they specialized in not dropping the ball Now again, you may say well, isn't that what is receivers supposed to specialize in catching the ball? No, no, no, no There is a difference There is a difference These receivers specialize in not dropping the ball They could have got some other receivers They could have got some of more high-profile name receivers, but the receivers that they got Specialized in not dropping the ball They have some of the lowest drop percentages the lowest drop rates in The Kaleed from the collegiate level So they made sure that they addressed the receiver position and they got some speed too They got speed too Because you can have all the speed in the world, but if you can't catch your ball, it does no good It does no good So Ravens addressed adding some speed and adding some guys that can catch So again, all stuff they got to do with that Titans playoff game Then we go to the game before that they lost against the Browns Said in the edge was the biggest thing there's a biggest thing and then Just consistently running that football JK Dobbins They added them In a draft and just not tackling poor tackling who they get they got Patrick Queen and they got Malik Harrison That game with the Browns was just it wasn't bad. It wasn't poorly coached Wasn't bad coaching at all not at all It was poor execution though boy, that was some bad execution that game worse. There was all season The worst that it was all season terrible execution fumbling Nobody's wrapping up. There's so many miscommunications. Oh goodness. It was gross But again, they they taking these losses and they like a We won 14 games, but let's look at the three games that we lost And why? We're gonna address that we're gonna make this team better and Then of course the chiefs game chiefs game was a mix of quite a few things Chiefs game poorly coached poorly poorly coached But with the chiefs and because that is somebody who the Ravens are gonna have to overcome On their way to get to the promised land so to speak this Season if they want to get to the Super Bowl, you're gonna have to beat the chiefs. You have to you have to and In order to beat the chiefs you got to match fire with fire, man So the receivers at the Ravens added more firepower More firepower and they're not done yet. I know they're not done yet. I Do not think they're done at wide receiver And I just didn't they're not done No, they drafted Duvenay and pro shea and I'm looking forward to both of them Of course, they brought in some more undrafted free agents One is Michael Darius who I was actually looking at today And I was actually getting ready to do the video about him, but then this came up So we're gonna do that video a little bit later, but I Know Ravens aren't done yet and then at the tight end position too I still think they're gonna bring in the veteran there But they still got some more moves that they gonna make For sure for sure. No way that this dude named Eric D'Costa No way that he's finishing a symbol in this team No way he's finished just putting these guys together putting this roster together and of course we got a long ways to go but I'm Thoroughly convinced that he's still got some more moves to make and some more significant moves Significant moves One thing And I know this this doesn't really have anything to do with panemic feet, but it's been on a lot more Ravens minds as Everyday passes Who's gonna get signed next and who's not gonna get signed? Because again, I've been trying to send little messages. So when it does when the time does come They can be a little less painful people just a little bit because even though even though you can know something's coming It can still hurt It can still hurt So they got some big contracts to give out soon Ronnie Stanley Again, you think he's gonna want to settle for something under what Larry me tonsil got no Especially him being much better than Larry me tonsil Crazy how that worked out right because the Ravens were gonna get Larry me tonsil. They were interested in Larry me tonsil Gas mask video came out. Hey, this is why you always got to be team keep it clean So you never know who's watching you never know who's recording even though He was looking directly at the camera when he was there when he had that gas mask on so anyway stock dropped But Dolphin said hey, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, you hold up right there.  You come to Miami He buy it was happy like oh Ravens. Well, yeah, I could have been winning more, but who would have been so cold but anyway Ronnie Stanley, he's not going to settle for less than what Larry me tonsil got And he's gonna get he's gonna get probably not even just one million more probably a couple mil more than that Is he gonna get it from the Ravens?  He gonna make some bread, man He's gonna make some bread and then of course Lamar Now when you pay your quarterbacks, that's that's when it just sends a shockwave through the entire team and a lot can change a Lot can change Now it is a beautiful thing though because with Lamar Jackson with him being the type of quarterback that he is He is an elevator of the entire team He elevates the offensive line because they get to do a little less work Because he can move around so much. He can help make them better He elevates whatever running backs back there because why he can move around because and the defense has got to worry about him running to and Then boom, okay. It's like oh man. Well that that takes pressure off the running back. That's next to him With the wide receivers They got to do more they they're gonna get a little less catches because of this Ravens offense, but His play style if safe instance, they they get locked up at first He moved around in a pocket. They break free of that cornerback. He can buy them some extra time to break free now And he can help make them better tight ends. Oh, we even got to get to the tight ends We ain't got to get to the tight ends Because you know he's gonna feed them tight ends, right? And then with the defense Those long drives that the Ravens put together that makes the defense is better because one the defenses They they they get more well rested and then two with the Ravens long drives most of the time They're scoring touchdowns. So that forces the defense or that forces the opposing offense That puts more pressure on them to pass the ball and do less running So the defense is in they they in pass defense most of us like, okay, we just got to sit back and like they always say Oh, they they they pin their ears back in the end wind But anyway, so Lamar is one of those quarterbacks that can he can help everybody He can help everybody and when he's hot. He's hot Now when he's not Get a little rough When he's hot, he's hot and it just makes everybody that much better So that doesn't take away from the fact that the Ravens still got some very tough decisions to make but One decision that they did have to make that wasn't so tough and which was a small decision was bringing back one Pranel McPhee. So like Pranel McPhee isn't anymore with the Baltimore Ravens He was for a little while for a couple months, but now he's not anymore I'm out. I love y'all team. Keep it clean. I see y'all later on


What's up YouTube? This is a video right up for the challenge LDab in the web category of CSAW CTF 2018. So it gives us this link here and we can go ahead and visit it in our browser. And we're greeted with this AnyCop directory with a search field and looks like a listing of employees with some information. So from the headers of the table here you can see that it has OU, CN, SN, given name, and UID. So I'm going to assume given based off of the challenge title LDab and some of these letters here that this is a reference to LDAP. So LDAP being the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, which is kind of, at least from my understanding, a Windows thing. What Microsoft includes as part of Active Directory and stuff that you would see in a domain controller for handling multiple users in a big corporate network or kind of business infrastructure, etc. So it is like segregated or split up into a hierarchy, whoa, sorry, that was a weird hierarchy, not hierarchy, auto-carcophagus. OU is the kind of abbreviation for organizational units. CN is kind of the abbreviation for canonical name, at least from what I'm understanding. And I'm not an expert here, so please do criticize me in comment. I would appreciate that. UID is from what I understand the unique identifier that will keep track of one individual user. So that is kind of the special spot here. What I'm going to assume again is that this is LDAP injection being a web challenge with a search functionality. Normally you'd expect like a SQL injection kind of thing, but this is a different kind of database structure. So it's LDAP. And there is such thing as LDAP injection. And I've actually seen this before in the Sands Holiday Hack Challenge. You can actually take a look at some of these things for OWASP. There's some information on, okay, this is how you can test for LDAP injection. And it goes through and explains that an LDAP search filter is constructed in Polish notation or prefix notation, where the queries that you're kind of trying to use like and or etc. don't come while you're kind of building out your condition. They kind of come before you have the parts of your condition. So it gives you an example here on Wikipedia. Rather than saying 5 minus 6 times 7, you essentially say times minus 5, 6 in that group again times 7. So kind of weird to read. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense in my mind, admittedly, but it is a thing. So that's what LDAP and that's what we're working with. When I had seen LDAP injection before, it was for the Sands Holiday Hack Challenge. So my first like gut instinct was to go review this page. But this was kind of a specific thing that's supposed to be crafted for the Sands Holiday Hack Challenge. So they were giving a kind of specific example where they're actually reading out of the page itself. And the attributes or some of the inputs that you're using were actually being implemented in the request back to the database. So if you, I guess, have taken part in the Sands Holiday Hack Challenge 2017 before, you may recognize this. Admittedly, this is a rabbit hole for the challenge that we're working with right now. There are some really cool tools though, like something that I don't remember the name of, but I know there is like an LDAP dump thing that you could probably find the GitHub page for whatever cool weapon that thing is. And again, please direct me in the comments to share the knowledge, spread the love here. What I ended up doing, again, because I dislike that prefix notation, that Polish notation for actually searching for stuff, I knew that I had a wild card that would work, and I would be able to retrieve stuff just like that other than searching for strictly someone named like Bob. I could return everything with a wild card, an asterisk there. But I wanted to be able to reach out more based off of a given field, like a canonical name, unique identifier, etc.  Thanks, Google. And some of the top results here were from payload, all the things, the GitHub repo, which is an incredibly awesome archive. If you haven't seen that before, totally check that out. Huge props to ever put this thing together. It's incredible. It has a lot of payloads and like sample commands that you can just literally slap at a service or application and just see what it does. Kind of help fuzz a little bit. So I got to this LDAP injection page where it gives us an example here, and you can start to, again, throw some of these filters at the application. I thought I'd just try this payload here, go ahead and throw it in the search field, and this gets results for us. And if you go ahead and explore it, you can see, whoa, there's the flag. Kind of crazy simple, not a whole lot, very difficult, hard thing. But again, that's just knowing your arsenal, trying to track down this example payload. And admittedly, it's probably a better thing for me to kind of piece this together and understand a little bit more. But I think if I could just detect, okay, there is LDAP injection in a vulnerable service, at that point, I would say, okay, let's put together what would be a query or whatever attack to load something that we need. So at this point, I feel like I've done that. I've just tracked down the payload that is getting what we need with the UID, unique identifier segment here. So cool. Hope that one was kind of interesting. Hope that one was kind of neat. Totally keep this in mind. LDAP injection is a thing. And once you recognize it, once you're kind of seeing OU organizational unit, CN and canonical name, et cetera, know that that is your target and know that that's what you can narrow down your search for. Hey, quick shout out to the people that support me on Patreon. Thank you guys so much. This list is getting long, and it's just incredible, really surreal that you're just willing to like from the goodness of your heart from literally just generosity that's built inside of a human to help out another human being. So thank you. $1 a month on Patreon will give you a special shout out just like this in every video just to make you feel special and good and warm inside. $5 a month on Patreon has a little bit more incentive in that you get early access to everything that released on YouTube before it goes live. So if I like to record videos in bulk, it'll be published in like a shared Google Drive that you'll have access to before YouTube will gradually like delay schedule or release. And that's hopefully not too much $5 on Patreon. That's all it asks for. If you did like this video, please do like comment and subscribe. Link to our Discord server is in the description. It's a cool community full of CTF players, programmers and hackers. If you want to come hang out with me or other cool people, that's the place to do it. We like to get together for CTF competitions. So CESAW right that's happening this weekend. Again, kind of piggybacking off CESAW. Pico CTF that's coming out very, very soon, 2018. We're stoked for the game. So please do join the party. I will personally greet and welcome each and every one of you if I'm awake and functioning. Hey, thanks again guys. Hope to see you on Patreon. Hope to see you in the next video. Love ya. Bye.


I'm Jenny, one of your Fox Sports Girls. Military children are some of my greatest heroes. Thank you all for your winning attitude and everything you do for your mom and dad. We're all proud of you.


Hi everybody, happy Tuesday. I'm Joe for jazby'scasebreaks.com coming at you with 2021-22 Panini Revolution Basketball. Eight box, pick your team number 11, the first inner case of a fresh master case. So let's actually select the inner case first. I had that earmarked for 11 and 12 already. And for those of you watching live, 12, pick your team 12, that second inner case is already in the store. So we've got a good shot of running that back tonight. All right, we'll roll the dice. One, two, three for the left side, four, five, six for the right side. We'll use that one right there. Six, one, two, three, four, five, six. And so this side we'll do for break 12, maybe later tonight. Pick your team 12, right here. All right, big thanks to this group for making it happen. Thanks for grabbing all of your teams straight up. No filler, appreciate that. Alan ended up with that double last spot. Mojo, Nix and Spurs, 70% of the time, 100% of the time. Thanks everybody for getting in. Now there was the Celtics, Milwaukee at Celtics, game two and Celtics bouncing back in strong fashion. They beat the Bucs 109 to 86, really stifling the Bucs. Giannis got 28, nine and seven assists. Bobby Porter's at 13 points, Drew Holiday at 19 points, but that was about it. Conaton at 13 points, but Brooke Lopez really struggled. Only a couple of points from him. Not even a three point chance. Matthew's four points. So kind of a rough day at the up. Grace and Alan only five points, only put up one three. Didn't make it. So yeah, over the course of the series, I think Bucs will adjust. They've got some good players, but not having Chris Middleton I think is gonna just kind of starting to show. All right, here's first box. All-card ship, Jason Tatum. Had a nice game today, 29 points, a few rebounds, eight assists, three steals and a block. It's Davion Mitchell Vortex. It's Davion Mitchell again. Jonathan Kaminga as well. Rookie card for Golden State. John Morant Groove. And this is numbered. It's a Dennis Schroeder. Five out of 60, Sunburst. Nice looking card for Houston. That's gonna be for Rob. And we've got an Evan Mobley Rookie Revolution insert for Cleveland. That'll be for Dave. All right, box one in the books. Sorry guys, it's almost 80 degrees in here. All right. Next box. Good luck. Tyrese Halberden is Pacers Gear. And we got a Jalen Johnson.  That'll be for Kevin. And there's a Scotty Barnes Rookie card. Your MBA Rookie of the Year. People at Yolkish Fractal. Jonathan Kaminga insert. Another Scotty Barnes. This is a Rookie Revolution insert. And we got a BAM out of bio impact. 98 out of 149 for Miami. That'll be for Brian. Big Dawthing and Mobley should have been. Should have been Rookie of the Year. Yeah, I think even, I think Vegas had Evan Mobley as a pretty strong favorite. But maybe, maybe they, yeah, I don't know. I don't know what the, actually have not looked up how, I think it was close. The voting is pretty close. We've got the sounds of the Warriors in Memphis on in the background. That game just started. You can still have, you still have time to vote in our poll. Who wins game two? Golden State leads the series one, nothing. Golden State, the road favorites minus two or is it Memphis plus two? I think early on, Golden State were heavy favorites according to voters in our chat. One point, there were like 85% just thought that Golden State would do it. Win game two, but, ooh, nice Josh Giddy. That's a Josh Giddy galactic. Whoo! Vortex insert galactic parallel for Johnny and O.K.C. Nice. If he hadn't gotten injured in the middle of the season, I wonder if there was, if that rookie of the year race would have been a lot closer.  Aim with that one. Anyway, now, Golden State's at 59%. So a little less confidence. Just as this game is getting underway. So just a few minutes into the first quarter, Grizzly's up eight nothing. Dylan Brooks, maybe Flagrant? Dylan Brooks ejected. There was a windup, a slap on the head. Yeah, Flagrant, Flagrant for sure. Says big doc, Flagrant too, even. So he has done those. Yeah, just watching basketball throughout the season. There's another Josh Giddy for you, Johnny. But the windup is a big thing. So if you kind of see a windup happening, I think I feel like I've, it's always been Flagrant too, almost. 128 to 149, Lonzo impact. Dave with the bulls. Yeah, silly move by Dylan, Dylan Brooks. And he's a star, he's, he contributes significant minutes there.  There's a Donovan Mitchell, then there's Davion Mitchell. I want to say in college, Davion Mitchell actually wore the same number as Donovan Mitchell. So it'd be kind of funny to see like D Mitchell 45 or I think that's not a Mitchell number, 45 on his on the back. All right, we are halfway through this intercase break. Tramon Green took an elbow to the face. This is pretty physical, physical series here. We're just, we're just only a few minutes into game two. A lot of time left in the first quarter game just started but Grizzlies are still up eight and one. On the Warriors. Gary Payton Jr. is your lead scorer for the Golden State Warriors with one point. That was a free throw. Tom Moran has to make some shock waves here without Dylan Brooks. And we've got a Moses Moody fractal autograph for the Warriors. Warriors come out to play, Shang with Golden State. The fractal perils are numbered when they're autographs. That's 35 out of 100. Then we've got an impact, Wendell Carter Jr. Mr. Wendell, that'll be for David. There's a number right there, 24 out of 149. Trey Young Shockwave, Joel Embiid, Astro and Zach Levine. Next box, Tyrese Maxie, Jonathan Kominga Shockwave, Evan Mobley Vortex for Cleveland. Those all go to Dave. John Moran lift off. We'll see a big dunk from John Moran today. Michael Loos with Memphis. And behind Brandon Ingram is Carl Malone. Autograph. That's Aime. Taranova with the Utah Jazz. Fractal parallel, 92 out of 100. And behind him is Christoph Porzingis. 253 out of 149 impact parallel for Brian and the Wizards. All right, second last box. This is Picker Team 11. Picker Team 12, the second intercafe from that master I just popped open. Available now, Picker Teams. Kate Cunningham, Astro. That's for Detroit. That'll be for Michael L. And Vince Carter, another old school player here. This is for the Raptors. Dino DNA, Rob. Nice, Vinsanity. And a cubic Kailari, 14 out of 50. Gonna be for Brian and the Heat. Final box. Final box, Picker Team 11. Good luck, everybody. Last box, here's a nice Jalen Green. Die cut for Houston. Gonna be for Rob. I think I see a little, I see a card flipped around. Might be an autograph there. Got a Jalen Suggs Fractal. And the autograph is another old school player. That's Jamal Crawford. Clippers. That's gonna be for Brian Kay and the Clip Show. There you go. And a sunburst, Zach Levine, 18 out of 60. That's for the Bulls. That's gonna go to Dave Rob. Sunburst pattern looks really cool, Dave. And the last little bit here, there's Jameon Green. Got an elbow to the face in the locker room. Josh Christopher Astro. There's Dylan Brooks, Flagrant II. Exited early in the game. Joshua Primo right here. And there you go, gang. I'm Joe for jaspeaskacebrakes.com. That was Revolution Basketball. Pick your team number 11. 12 is in the store. Probably run that back tonight. We'll see you for that, jaspeaskacebrakes.com. Bye-bye.


The radical, fundamental principles of freedom, rational self-interest, and individual rights. This is The Iran Brookshow. Hey everybody, welcome to Iran Brookshow. It's Wednesday, April 19th. Hope everybody's having a good time. Yeah, I mean, I think the most important news story right now actually is the one we haven't heard the result of. I'm waiting. We'll talk about it tomorrow would be my guess. And that is what we need to hear from the Supreme Court about the ruling regarding the abortion pill. That's probably the biggest story right now, but we won't know much about it until, you know, we get word from, we get word from the court. So should you hear before midnight today, it's unlikely they just don't say anything and let the ruling of the appellate court stand. It is that is possible. But I expect I expect some word from the Supreme Court by, I don't know, by 5 p.m. East Coast time or something like that. Hard to tell exactly what's going on in the chambers of the various justices. We'll see it's a big it's a big decision.  But at least this will get get things going. All right. That's the news we don't have yet and hopefully we'll have soon. Let's see. Colin says great show last night really appreciate that Colin thank you. Hope the rest of you enjoyed that show if you haven't yet go listen to it. It's it was not it didn't have a huge number of people live or a huge number of people watching it last night so early morning. So if you haven't seen it yet, go go watch it. It's about it's about organized crime and drugs and drug legalization and the consequence of organized crime and drugs and everything. So I thought it was pretty good show Ryan. Thank you Catherine. Thank you. They all got started on our path on our path towards getting to $250 which is our goal for the news roundup shows. So thank you guys. All right. Let's see. Danny will get to your question in a little bit. Let's start with with kind of the news. I guess over the last weekend, large numbers of teenagers in, you know, in various areas in downtown Chicago, aggregated together hundreds of them outside in various junctions around Millenium Park but also in other areas in the downtown vicinity. There was a number of videos floating around YouTube and other places of some of these teenagers beating up on passes by not exactly clear what what the passes by did to deserve the beatings but well probably nothing. Nobody deserves a beating like we saw on these videos. But to invoke the beatings to generate the beatings but it does look like it was a pretty brutal weekend. Police are not much to be seen on these videos. Police were way outnumbered by these teenagers and it looks like police backed off. A lot of stores shut down and actually had to find different ways through back alleys and so on to get their customers out because the exits seem dangerous to go into these crowds of teenagers. This is Chicago. If you remember during 2020 Chicago was one of the worst cities. In Chicago, these the so-called demonstrations around Black Lives Matter turned very quickly into riots and and turned very quickly more so than I think in other cities into looting. So in Chicago, many people, many gangs turned turned the demonstrations into opportunities to loot, particularly to loot high end stores on the millionaires mile and Michigan Avenue Louis Vuitton and other stores like that were looted. People ran in, grabbed bags, grabbed other stuff and ran out. In Chicago, I remember the mayor defending the looting, basically calling it just a form of reparations. Yep, reparations, redistribution of wealth, a little bit of redistribution of wealth is not a bad thing. I've argued, not surprising, you know, Chicago had some of the worst riots in in Millennial Park, where passerbys again were beaten up, where police were beaten up. It was brutal. This is continuing. I don't think that the the teenager, you know, there was some event with police that sparked I think this teenager, you know, wasn't exactly a demonstration and it wasn't exactly a riot. It's hard to characterize it again. But this violent outburst and against, you know, law-abiding citizens in in the city, it's just brutal. And the fact that the police will do very little or nothing. Police are supposed to have the kind of equipment to deal with riots. If there are beatings going on, it is the police's responsibility and job to do something about that, including, I don't know, using tear gas, using whatever mechanisms they have in order to break up a riot. You can't just let ordinary people be beaten up by people just because they're teens or just because they're large numbers of them does not give you an excuse to do that. And if you don't have enough police, hire more police. But of course, this is Chicago. Chicago is super tolerant of riots, super tolerant of disruption. You know, you should, I don't necessarily recommend watching these videos. And some of the videos, the attribution is questionable. We're not exactly sure. But of course, the mayor of Chicago just elected a super left-wing mayor. Chicago is just a disaster zone. The mayor came out and said, well, of course, we're always against violence and we'll get property crime and we're against this stuff. He said, it's not constructive to demonize youth who have otherwise been starved of opportunity in their own communities. So basically, it's not their fault that they're beating up people and that they're robbing stores and that they're committing vandalism. Because, you know, they're starved of opportunities and this is just another form of redistribution, reparations. This is to compensate them, you know, beating once in a while makes them feel better, I guess, given how oppressed they are the rest of the time. He says, quote, our city must work together to create spaces for youth to gather safely and responsibly under adult guidance and supervision to ensure that every part of our city remains welcome for both residents and visitors. Good luck with with Chicago's recovery. If this is the attitude of Chicago leadership towards violent crime against people just going in and out of stores and visiting the city.  Many commentators expect that the coming weekend will see teenagers again. And it is it is just it certainly is unbelievable the extent to which Chicago voted, given the history of violence, given the amount of violence that's happening in Chicago, that Chicago voted for a soft and crime progressive instead of somebody who ran explicitly on and we don't know how good he would have been but on a on a tough and crime agenda and they rejected that. Laurie Lightfoot, you know, condemned what was going on. You know, she she said this was reckless disrespectful and unlawful behavior. As I've said before, we as a city cannot and will not allow any of our public spaces to become platform for criminal conduct. More importantly, parents and guardians must now must know where their children are and be responsible for their actions instilling the important values of respect for people and property must begin at home. Yeah, where was she when she was mayor? I guess she's still mayor. She's the city mayor. The turnover hasn't happened yet. But where was she? What happened to all that redistribution stuff? What happened to the to the soft hand of the police and the soft hand of the city authorities during the BLM riots that inflicted Chicago and the looting that happened during that time? Give me give me a give me a break. Why not deploy the National Guard given given that the police seem to be outmanned outnumbered. There are lots of things that can be done. Lots of things that can be done. But I know. All right. So Chicago is still a mess. It looks like India, the population of India just according to UN estimates at least just surpassed the population of China. So for the first time, India has more people in it than China has. I think this is a big deal. It represents both a decline of China. I think China is in real trouble. Demographically, it is not only a shrinking population. It's going to start shrinking, but it is an aging population, dramatically aging population. It is lacking. It's going to lack in the decades to come the vitality of a youthful country. This is on top of the increased authoritarianism, increased regulation, increased control of the economy, which is going to slow economic growth in spite of the fact that the Beijing government just announced 4.5% annual growth in the first quarter of this year. That's below what they had said as a target 5%. It's still high, 4.5%, but is it real given that these are numbers produced by Beijing and these are numbers primarily based on government investment in infrastructure. So I think the change in population numbers represents a shift. While India, in terms of size of economy and GBDP per capita, is still far behind China, it has the population growth to sustain economic growth. It also has a significantly younger population. What India needs in spades now is basically a liberated economy and get rid of all the regulations and controls and just obstacles that both federal and local governments in India put before businesses to allow them to expand and to allow them to grow and to allow them to create wealth. And then what India needs is significant capital investment. They need new capital to come in. They need US and European companies to set up shop there. And of course for that, they need to lower trade barriers. They need lower barriers on foreign investment. They need to liberalize the economy. India has this massive potential. They have a very large number of highly educated individuals. They have some of the best engineering schools in the world. They have a real potential to become an economic superpower, which they are squandering. They're squandering with their control and regulations and limitations on foreign capital and everything else. They're squandering by sticking to the caste system. While officially it doesn't exist, it still very much exists where people are categorized from whom they are born, not by their own ability. So India has massive potential and massive, all kinds of constraints, artificial constraints placed on it that restrict its ability to grow and raise its own standard of living. Indians are still relatively poor, even as compared to the Chinese. And again, huge upside, young population, growing population, they need the liberty, the freedom and the capital to turn that upside into something real, into real economic growth and real economic wealth. Let's see, one second. Let's see. So you remember, as part of the documents that came out during this latest leak, that, you know, Tarkov Kostin and many others, particularly in the right, made a big deal out of the fact that it looked like Ukraine was running out of ammunition for its Soviet-era air defense system. And this was a sign that Ukraine was losing and they came to this massive conclusion that Russia was winning, Ukraine was losing. And a lot of this coming out of one document that stated that Ukraine was running out of ammunition for its air defenses and therefore was vulnerable for Russia basically gaining air superiority, dominating the skies, taking over the skies and having a free reign in bombing Ukraine. Well, today it was reported that Ukraine has just received, on Ukrainian soil, two batteries of Patriot anti-aircraft missiles. These are batteries that were promised, one by the United States and the other by, I think, a couple of NATO countries. It had been promised months ago that the Ukrainian teams have been training on these systems over the last few weeks and months. They are finally fully trained. The training took only four months instead of a full year. The Ukrainians are highly motivated and fast learners and therefore these systems are now being deployed in Ukraine. The Patriot missile system is light years ahead of anything that the Ukrainians have had before this. It is significantly ahead of any of the Soviet-era systems. It is significantly ahead of systems that the Russians have. These Patriot missile systems basically are going to secure the skies for Ukraine. Ukraine is finished because it can defend itself from the sky. The sky rhetoric, as usual, was just propaganda and nonsense and with no consideration for the fact that the cavalry was coming. In the cavalry, in this case, are these two Patriot systems. These are super sophisticated missile systems. They launch a number of different types of missiles. They are super expensive and they take months to train people on and now they've been trained and they have been deployed. The systems, we'll see where the Ukrainians deploy them, but these missile systems should be able to protect Ukraine both from Russian airplanes. I don't think the Russians have anything that can stop themselves being shot down by these systems. They can also shoot down missiles. They can shoot down ballistic missiles. They can shoot down cruise missiles. This will provide enhanced security to Ukrainian cities, Ukrainian forces from air attack. There is also talk for the first time of Israel providing the Ukrainians with air defense systems that don't replace, not instead of the Patriots, but overlap with the Patriots that provide for different type of projectiles, different type of missiles shot into Ukraine. If Ukraine can deploy Israeli systems as well, it will have an unbelievably robust air defense system much better than most other countries have. Indeed, it will guarantee a denial of the airspace to the Russian air force, which is pretty striking, because you would think, again, as I've said many times, you think that the Russians would dominate the skies over Ukraine and that has not happened and now, with the Patriot systems deployed, certainly will not happen. More reason, more, I guess, validation of my argument that Taka Kossom was just plain lying the other day and so is Candace Owen and so are the rest of them who are arguing that the documents that were released showed Ukraine was going to lose an unbelievable buy-in to Russian propaganda, but that is today's, much of today's right is serving that purpose of being a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda. So, yes, a lot of speculation about next steps in Ukraine, a lot of speculation about this idea of a spring offensive. It would be interesting to see if that spring offensive becomes a reality and it would be interesting to see where the Ukrainians choose to launch that offensive. Remember, the Russians basically have been using in the last six months to beef up the defenses, to build defensive lines. So it's going to be interesting where the Ukrainians identify a weak spot and where they choose to try to puncture those defensive lines. It's going to be an interesting cat and mouse in the next few weeks. Russians trying to figure out where the Ukrainians are doing, the Ukrainians trying to pretend they're doing one thing while doing another thing. It'll be a strategic, you know, a really interesting strategic game going on on the ground in Ukraine. All this while Bakhmut continues to hold. Who knows for how long, still, but continues to hold a massive, I think, distraction for the Russians while Ukraine prepares for this offensive. Okay, let's see. We are way behind on the super chat, so I just wanted to let you know that. We still have over $200 to go for the $250. Again, you know, it's really important that we raise the $250 every show or at least most shows as an expression of support for this format. This is still running as an experiment and we need to see if this is viable. Otherwise, we'll have to switch to a different delivery format, a different program format. I think some of you value the new shows. Hopefully many of you do, but those of you who do, please consider supporting this using the super chat or as a multi-contribution, www.urunbrookshow.com. Patreon, those are probably the two best ones. It seems like fewer people are using Subscribestar, so Patreon or PayPal through www.urunbrookshow.com. Super chat is important. It's a significant way in which we fund the show. It has become a significant way in which we fund the show over the last couple of years, so please consider doing something. We've got about 60 people watching, so we need about $4 from each of you, maybe $5 from each of you to get to where we need to go. It would be great if you'd consider doing $4 to $5. Volta, thank you. Vladimir, thank you for using the sticker feature without asking a question. I only got two super chat questions, so the show today is likely to be pretty short. A news item out of the European Union, which I found particularly interesting and I think actually good news. The European Union is this conglomeration of many countries. I can't remember how many in this, 17, 18, maybe 18 countries. But one of the challenges has been that every one of those countries has a different legal system. Every one of those countries has different corporate law systems. Every one of those countries has a different tax system. So there's a lot of difficulty in terms of setting standards that are European-wide and that can make it easier for businesses to function, and maybe one of the most important of those, and a legitimate function of government, and therefore particularly important, regulation is not a legitimate function of government, and that is the patent system. So in the past, if you'd wanted a patent, a product, a drug or something in Europe, you would have to file 17 or 18 different applications in all the different countries. Lawrence says they are 27 members.  Anyway, you'd have to file in 27 countries, you'd have to file different patent applications, which is a major hassle, a huge legal expense, and basically a pretty cumbersome. Lawrence says now it's 28, so it's changing by the minute. As of 2023, there are 28 members of the European Union. Anyway, over the last couple of weeks, it was announced that 17 countries, 17 EU countries, have agreed on a uniform system that will allow companies to apply for one patent only, and it would be covered in all 17 countries. This is massive. This includes, by the way, some of the largest, this will include the largest economies in Europe, Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands. I don't think Spain is part of it, but Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands are part of it, so 17 countries are part of it. It will dramatically reduce the cost of filing for patents. It will dramatically lower the cost of doing business in Europe, particularly innovative business. It will increase the incentive to innovate and to invest in Europe, and this is a major step forward for European countries. It would be nice if this was actually agreed upon by 28 countries, but now that a standard has been set and an organization has been established to file this patent, I think it will be relatively easy for other governments to join this, as compared to just sitting aside from it. I'll note that this is particularly good for small to medium-sized businesses, again, for companies like startups, because they're the ones who don't have the money to file in 28 different jurisdictions. So now, instead of 17 jurisdictions, they can file in one. I don't think this is slight. I think this is significant, particularly given that this covers the largest economies and should bolster innovation, bolster investment in small to medium-sized enterprises in the Union. This is the kind of stuff the EU needs more of. It needs more standardization across the entire system. I am, for one, I know many people are not. I am, for one, a fan of the EU, not because of Brussels, not because of the regulatory state. It's awful, not because of the control from Brussels. It's awful, but because anytime you can create a union where there's free movements of good capital and labor, that is a massive step forward as compared to the alternative. I think Europe would be a lot poorer today, if not for the EU. And I think right now the UK is suffering from not being a part of the EU for a variety of different reasons. While the UK just signed a big trade agreement with the Pacific, that trade agreement that Donald Trump did not want us to sign and America is not part of. The UK is not a part of, TPP, I think it was called. It still has a lot less free trade today. The UK has a lot less free trade today than it did with the EU. And generally what the UK has done with its court independence from the European Union has been mostly very little and mostly wasteful. Anyway, TT IP, it's still early days post-Brexit. We'll see. So far the Conservative Party, which was the one pushing for Brexit, has done almost nothing positive with regard to Brexit and has done very little. And I think the UK is suffering already the consequence of it. Again, I'm not against Brexit. As I said at the time, I'm for Brexit if they do the right thing. So far they have not done the right thing. So far it has been a waste. All right, let's see. All right, that is it. We're still way behind on the super chat. Thank you, John. $20 really appreciate that. Thank you, Volta. But again, at this point, $3 from every person on the chat, on the listening live would get us over the top. A few Johns with $20 would get, you know, $9.20 questions would get us to where we need to be. And we'll provide some questions. We only have three questions to answer. So there's plenty of room for you guys to do super chats. OK, Danny from Hungry, I take it. The book Why Machines Will Never Rule the World makes a philosophical and technical argument about the limits of AI and the possibility of many of the claims being made. I'd love to see more about this or this discussed on objectives, forums. I mean, yeah, I mean, basically I agree with what the book is trying to say, although I'm not sure I agree with the argument that they're particularly making. I haven't read the book. I've just basically looked at a summary of what the book says. But I think that the whole idea of AI gaining what's called artificial general intelligence is ultimately impossible. I don't think artificial general intelligence or what human beings have. I don't think can be reduced to zeroes and ones in the sense of it cannot be reduced to mathematics. I think it has something to do with biology in a way that I don't think we yet understand. I think the only way you are going to create artificial intelligence is by using biology.  I think it has to be sentient. It has to have consciousness to actually be intelligent in a way human beings are intelligent. There has to be consciousness. Consciousness as far as we can tell in the universe only is connected with living beings. Computers are not alive. They cannot be conscious. So again, I think in order to get to the point where artificial intelligence has the capabilities that some people are so afraid of, it's going to have to be, again, it's going to have to be biological and that's not in the cards anytime soon. So yes, I think that's absolutely right. Now, whether I mean this book, which is selling for $130 hardcover $42 paperback $37 in Kindle, why machines will never rule the world artificial intelligence without fear. I like the title Jobs Langreb and Barry Smith are the authors. You know, it's probably over my head, so I'm probably not going to buy it. It's probably too mathematical for me, but it is an interesting topic. It is a topic I think objectives have a lot to contribute to both in terms of the philosophy and the integration with the mathematics and the biology of it. So I encourage people to read. It strikes me just again reading about this that I agree with the conclusions. You know, they say there are two reasons for the claim that artificial general intelligence cannot be created.  I think that's right. I would add to that it's biological and it requires consciousness. And without life and consciousness, you cannot have artificial general intelligence. It's not mathematical. You can't model it mathematically. And then the second reason is systems of this sort cannot be modified mathematically in a way that allows them to operate inside a computer. Again, that makes sense to me. But I don't know that because I can't prove it. I wouldn't know where to even start thinking about how to prove something like that. So this is beyond my, what do you call it, my pay scale. But I do encourage people who are interested in this. I do encourage objectivists who are interested in philosophy of consciousness who are interested in math and science and interested in AI to look into this book and examine it. It does look like a fascinating, fascinating book. Pay grade. Thank you. Above my pay grade. John. John is also asked a question for $30. Thank you, John. So we're like, we've raised $100. We're $150 short. So again, just letting everybody know. How does nihilism play into both mob violence and mass shooting? Well, it's the, nihilism basically is an attitude of resentment, hatred of the world, of reality. And it leads to, at least the desire to see things destroyed. At least the desire to see things crushed and flattened. And it, it of course makes it possible. Nihilism generally creates this attitude of uncaring about human life. It's just basically attitude that human life is meaningless. Life is value less. There are no values. Life is not a value. And while one's attitude towards oneself is that reflects one's attitude towards oneself. It also reflects one's attitude towards other people. That is other people don't matter. Their life doesn't matter, beating them up, killing them, shooting them, whatever. It doesn't really matter in the, in the big scale of things. And therefore it is, it is fine to engage in those kind of activities. Now I don't think you can explain every phenomena by reference to nihilism. It's not clear that a bunch of teenagers out that maybe they're drinking. Maybe they're just upset. Maybe they're mad. Maybe somebody pushes somebody. Maybe because of that push, somebody punches somebody.  It's not clear that what motivated that is nihilism. It could be just the nasty human beings. It's just, it just, you know, there is such a thing as kind of a mob mentality, a second-handedness, a just follow-the-mob kind of you that is reflected in it. So I wouldn't, I wouldn't say that all more violence is nihilistic, even though sometimes it is, sometimes it's purely motivated by that. But a lot of the theft, a lot of the riots, a lot of the slamming is motivated by anger. It's motivated by a sense of entitlement. And it could be motivated by, again, somebody pushing you. Or angered police because of the way police shootings are often framed or justifiably at police because what police really have done or doing. There's a lot that goes into kind of the mob violence that we're seeing.   And that's much more nihilistic at its core, at its roots, it's hard. Now, some of the mass shootings are not.  The great replacement theory, which Takako Kosen has promoted. So it's that, that's just hatred. That it's not necessarily nihilism, it's not necessarily hatred, but it's ideologically motivated. So some mass shootings are motivated by racism or motivated by some ideology that is driving the shooting. So not every act of extreme violence is motivated by nihilism, but certainly nihilism can drive extreme violence. All right, we're about halfway there, guys. Frank asks, is gun control an experiment of the left to establish a taboo resulting in contributing to a culture of fear and its mockery anarchy? No, I mean, I don't think so. I mean, gun control is prevalent in many countries around the world.  Most countries have a lot of countries, I don't know about most, I've never looked at the study, have really strict gun control rules. Certainly Europe has that. I don't think you can just own a rifle in China or in Japan or in South Korea. I don't think you can own an AR-15. So I don't think so. I think gun control is an attempt to rid society of violence. It might be a bad attempt. It might be an inefficient attempt. It might be an attempt that involves violating individual rights to the extent that you have a right to own a gun in order to defend yourself. But I don't think it's a malicious event to establish some kind of taboo and establish a culture of fear and mockery. I don't see it that way.  I mean, much, much, much on orders of magnitude safer than America's, safer than the most gun-friendly place in America.  Culture makes us safe. Guns lead to shootouts. So culture makes us safe. And having a culture like in South Korea and Japan where you're completely safe and there's almost no violence is pretty cool. I mean, the cultures, they have other problems, but that is a pretty cool feature of those cultures. The fact is that America is more violent than Europe is, in spite of the fact that we have guns and they don't. We're much more violent than Europe. So, I don't view, you know, gun control as the most pressing, or anywhere near the most pressing problem that we have in America today. We have far, far bigger problems than gun control. Gun control, I think, is a relatively minor issue in the grand scale of things. South London, even South London, is a lot safer than many parts of the United States. You can look at the numbers. And London generally is a lot safer than a lot of cities in the United States. And a lot of cities where guns are allowed in the United States. So guns are not what make you safe. Culture, in fact, a police saying, but primarily culture, is what makes you safe. Guns do not keep you safe from extreme government overreach.  That is, extreme government overreach is a consequence of the population wanting extreme government overreach. Extreme government overreach in a place like the United States is not going to come as a surprise. It's not going to come as some big action against you. It's slow and steady, and you keep voting for it. You keep voting for it. South London, knife crime is out of control, maybe, but just compare. Compare motor rates in South London with Chicago. And you tell me what's better. And there are plenty of guns in Chicago. Or compare it to St. Louis, or compare it even to some cities in Texas. Yeah, I know. I don't make any friends by not making a big deal out of gun control.  I think I lost a bunch of subscribers yesterday. Maybe it's over legalizing drugs. Maybe it's something I said during the news segment in the morning. Maybe I said something negative about Trump or DeSantis. By the way, DeSantis seems to be really floundering, really floundering. Yesterday he went to Washington, D.C. and schmoozed with congressmen. At the end of his visit, three congressmen came out and endorsed Trump. Nobody endorsed DeSantis. So I fear those of you think DeSantis is going to save the Republican Party that he is thoroughly squandering his opportunity. Did I criticize Trump yesterday? Maybe it's a criticizing Trump. I lost a bunch of subscribers a lot yesterday, surprisingly. Hunter Hunter says, I recently had to pay my state's annual business privilege tax. Could there be possibly a more ridiculous name for a tax? Probably not a business privilege tax. It's a privilege that the government has let you have a business. There was something in California that I thought was a real winner. The Equalization Board. California has an Equalization Board that is responsible for sales tax or something. But it's an Equalization Board. It's right out of Atlas Shrugged or unbelievable. They're there to equalize us all. Nicholas Navarro says, do you have an opinion on Steve Schwartzman as a business person, CEO of Blackstone? Look, Steve Schwartzman, certainly early in his career was a phenomenal business person. There's no way Blackstone could have reached the size and influence and success that it has reached without its management being phenomenal and truly incredible from a business perspective. At some point, when Stephen got to the point of great wealth and great success, he decided that he wanted to be beloved as well and he wanted to sign on to the latest coolest social justice ideas. I don't know when that happened, maybe 10 years ago. But by that point, Blackstone was already this amazing powerhouse. He started advocating for ESG and all kinds of other nonsensical policies. So the fact that he was a very successful, very good, very competent, very effective CEO, I guess did not prevent his ultimate corruption. And so I wouldn't judge somebody like Stephen Schwartzman just based on the last 10 years. I would also really consider his early career versus his more political career in the last decade or so. All right, let's see. All right, on our last super chat question, we're still about 130 short of our goal, which is a big hole. I know it's going to require $3 from everybody watching right now. So that's a big hole. So that's fine if we don't make our numbers today. We made them yesterday, but made them yesterday in the morning anyway. So let's take Frank's last question. So if anybody wants to pitch in to get us closer to the goal, that would be incredibly cool and incredibly wonderful. But if not, I completely understand. Frank says, countries worried about climate change may consider nuclear power, but some raise their concern about storing radioactive waste. What can be done? Well, a few things. One is France uses technology in its nuclear power plant that basically has almost no radioactive waste. The waste is minute and tiny. Second, you can find a deserted place in your country and dig a very, very deep hole. Nuclear waste is not large in size. It doesn't take up a lot of space.  We have the technology to do this. That mountain in Nevada in the United States could have contained all the nuclear waste that the United States generates without any problem, without any leakage for tens of thousands of years. It would have not been an issue. This is all artificially created fear mongering. There is no technical problem of nuclear waste. Look again at what Scandinavian countries are doing. Scandinavia is the only part of Europe that is actively expanding their nuclear power facilities. I think Finland just opened a nuclear power plant last week. This is after 18 years being constructed way over budget and way over price, but at least it opened a nuclear power plant. That's an achievement. They have somehow solved this problem. I think every country can solve the problem. I think it's a lame excuse. It's not anything else. Germany went off nuke, which is tragic. I talked about that yesterday or the day before yesterday, which is tragic for Germany. It just means I'll have to burn more coal and I'll have to buy electricity from the French who are using nuclear power for it. All right, everybody, thanks for being here. Thanks for participating. Thank you to all the superchats. Thank you for the support. Thank you to all the superchatters for their support. Really appreciate it. And as I said, you can support the show on a monthly basis on Patreon or on you on bookshow.com. See you all tomorrow morning for another one of these shows. Another one of the new shows. And please let me know if this continues to be a value to all of you.


The main aim was to put together all prison directors in Cambodia. The WTAB department has been working in places of detention for more than 20 years and we have been working in almost all the prisons in the country. But it's the first time that we really had all the directors together. We could present what ICRC is doing in Cambodia and we could also discuss about WTAB projects in prisons. In the first place, we have a 3rd place in the district. We have a 165th place in Cambodia. We have a 2nd place in Cambodia. We have a 1st place in Cambodia. In fact, they didn't come from the WTAB department to choose a prison. They came from the deputy of the director general because he also recognized that the good initiatives taken by the director can be copied in other prisons and he wanted to show this to all the other prison directors. In the last few years, I have seen big changes in the language and mindset throughout the prison system, both at management level and in the prisons, is the idea that prisons are not a place of punishment, which is the mindset in the past, but rather a place for corrections, a place where detainees can be rehabilitated.


So, we focus on fireworks around the Fourth of July, but it's important to note CPSC year round is concerned about fireworks. We deal with what's coming into this country at the ports to make sure those are compliant. We make sure what's out in the marketplace is compliant. And most recently, we're doing recalls, and we do them on a regular basis. Make sure if a firework is overloaded, we'll do a recall with the company, get it away from consumers. CPSC removes thousands and thousands of illegal fireworks from the marketplace just to keep the consumers safe. It's a wonderful time of the year. We celebrate our nation's birthday just a few reminders. First and foremost, make sure that fireworks are legal in your community. Beyond that, make sure that you're not using professional fireworks. Leave professional fireworks to the professionals. If your firework doesn't ignite, don't try to reignite it. Make sure that you have a bucket of water or hose nearby if you're going to do fireworks in your yard. And beyond that, most importantly, don't give fireworks to kids. I do want to mention sparklers because sparklers, we think are safe. They burn as high as 2,000 degrees. They can burn. We see the highest rate of injuries in children under five because of sparklers. Be careful with sparklers. We want consumers to celebrate safely, but just be careful. So I work here in Washington, D.C. as a pediatric emergency medicine physician. And what I do is I treat ill and injured children. And injuries are actually the highest cause of death amongst children aged one and older. So this is why we're here today to talk about firework-related injury and safety. Because ideally, rather than treating these injuries after the fact, we want to get to them at the prevention level, prevent them before they even happen. These injuries we see are indeed from legally available consumer fireworks. There's terminology out there, safe and sane. This applies to fireworks that don't create huge explosions or aren't airborne. However, I would argue that when it comes to children, there really is no safe and sane firework. We're seeing these injuries in children under five. Now, children of those age, they explore the environment about them by touch and feel. So even if a nearby adult is the one holding the sparkler, all it takes is that split second for the toddler to reach out towards that shiny alluring flame, and it's all over. Because at those high temperatures, within two to three seconds, that child can sustain what we call a full thickness third degree burn down to the bone. And even though the majority of injuries we're talking about are burns, again, many full thickness down to the bone, we do also see other injuries that can be even more severe. Eye trauma, where you have penetrating injuries or something actually goes into the eyeball that can lead to permanent vision loss. We see in the worst case amputation of fingers of hands or even other parts of the body. Si bien nuestros datos para el 2018 son preliminares, ya nos cuentan una historia muy seria. Cinco personas murieron por incidentes vinculados a dispositivos de tipo coete aéreo. Algunos de ellos de uso profesional. Nuestro mensaje es muy claro. Hay que dejar la pirotecnia profesional en manos de los profesionales. Más de nueve mil personas fueron tratadas en emergencias el año pasado por lesiones vinculadas a fuegos artificiales. Casi la mitad de las víctimas menores de veinte años. Y las luces de vengala o las estrellitas fueron la causa principal de lesiones en niños pequeños. La mejor manera de mantener a la familia segura es no haciendo, no adquiriendo y no acercándose a los fuegos artificiales ilegales o de uso profesional. Hay que dejar la pirotecnia profesional en manos de los profesionales. Es mejor asistir a un espectáculo público. Si opta por usar fuegos artificiales, asegúrese que sean legales en su área y tome precauciones. Nunca hay que darle ningún tipo de fuego artificial a un niño, incluyendo luces de vengala o estrellitas. Siempre hay que tener agua en caso de emergencia. Nunca hay que tratar, por ejemplo, de volver a encender un fuego artificial que no se prendió y definitivamente no hay que usar fuegos artificiales ilegales.


Hello, everyone. I am Sanjay Gupta. I welcome you on Sanjay Gupta Tech School. In this video, I'm going to demonstrate you how you can use login flow in Salesforce. Let's understand the requirement of login flow. So we need to create a login flow, which will check whether user accepted terms and condition at the time of login or not. So I'm jumping into the org. So what we are going to do, we will be having a checkbox. So I'm going to show you on the user object. I already created a checkbox. So here you can see I have created a checkbox that is terms and condition accepted. So initially it is false, right? So whenever a user logs in. So our flow will be checking whether this checkbox is checked or not. If it is not checked, then a login flow will be there at the time of login and it will ask user to like, do you agree with terms and conditions or not? If user checks that checkbox, then this checkbox will be checked and on the next login that flow won't be launched, right? So now I'm taking you to set up where we can search login flow. So here login flows option is available and here you can see we can create new login flow. So you just need to click on new and from here you can select flow. If you have visual for space created, so you can select that as well. But in this demonstration, I'm just going to use flow on it. So I need to select the flow. Then here I need to provide the type then flow. So I also need to create a screen flow that we can link here. Then user license you can select Salesforce or maybe other licenses with which you want to connect us. So based on your license, you can select particular profile. So let's say we select standard user profile. So now if standard user profile user locks in, then only that particular flow will be launched. And if you want to render flowing lightning runtime, you can enable this checkbox, right? So I'm just canceling it as of now. So first let's see how we can implement a screen flow. So because after creation of the screen screen flow, you can only will be able to link your screen flow with the login flow. So just I'm opening this as I already created it. So I'm going to open each and every element and we'll show you so that you can also implement it in your org. So this is a simple screen flow. So first I created this decision. If I open this, so here you can see the label is check terms and condition. Then I have one outcome that is not accepted. And here I have used this dollar user dot terms and condition accepted, right? So you can simply type, I'm typing it again. So dollar user. So this is a global variable which will give you the information of currently logged in user. So you can select it and then you can search for terms and condition accepted. So this is a field which I already created in the org, right? So initially it will be false for the first time. So if it is false, then we need to move here on this direction. Then here we have this screen which will be having this display text. So this is a display text which you can search here. You can just click and have it here. Then put an API name and then the label or the message that you want to display. Then this is a checkbox which also you can search here, right? So click on this checkbox. It will be available here. Put a label. API will be populated automatically. So this way the screen will be created. So right now, okay. So after this login, I just need to have one more condition. So I just need to put one condition here. So we need to check whether user agreed or not. So if this checkbox is equals to true, it means user agreed. So in that case only we need to update the user that part, right? So you just need to apply this checkbox, which will check the user's response, which we are receiving here. And if I open this, so this is update record element, which will update the user record, which user record currently logged in user's record. So this way we provided the condition and we need to put true in this checkbox so that when second time user logs in, so this checkbox will be true. So your screen flow or login flow will not be launched. So it will be launched, but won't be visible on the UI, right? So now I'm going to save as and activate right now coming here. So I'm just deleting it so that I can recreate it for you. So I'm clicking on new selecting flow. Now here I am labeling it as terms and condition then terms underscore condition flow user license. I'm selecting a salesforce profile. I'm selecting standard user and this checkbox and I'm clicking on save, right? So this way this login flow is connected with the standard user profile. So every time whenever a user that is related to standard user profile logs in. So in that case your login flow will be launched. So what we need to do, we need to search for the user now. So here I have a user. So I'm just copying the username so that I can log in and I already know the password. So if you don't know the password, you can reset and set the password, then you can try it. And here on this record, you can see this checkbox is already checked. So I just need to edit it. And initially I am marking it unchecked. So right now it is unchecked. Right. So now I'm going to log out. In your case, maybe initially this will be unchecked by default because I just did some demonstration. That's why it was already checked. So now it is unchecked. I'm logging out. So I'm going to log in with this user username and password. And here at the time of login, you can see our login flow is there. So do you agree with terms and conditions? So here we have this checkbox next button. If you want to remove this pause button, so this is possible. So what you can do, open your screen. Okay. So right now, like we are logged out, so we won't be able to modify it through system admin. So I will show you that later on. So right now what I'm going to do, I'm just clicking on next without enabling this checkbox. So that I will again log out and we'll show you by logging in, like whether this screen flow or this login flow is launching or not. So if we keep it unchecked, so it will be launched again. So I clicked on next. So right now I am logged in as my another user. So here you can see now I am logging out again. And I'm going to log in again. So again, you can see this login flow is launching. So if I enable this checkbox, click on next. So this time again, I'm going to log out and again, I will be logging in with same user. But this time you will see that login flow won't be launched. So you can see you might have noticed that your flow finished that masses was coming, but it was finished because that checkbox was already checked. When we did attempt second time. So first time login flow launched, and it was displaying on the UI. Second time also login flow launched and it was displaying on UI. But third time login flow launched, but it doesn't didn't display the screen on the layout because that checkbox was already checked. Now I'm going to log out. And I will be going to log in with my system admin user so that I can show you that user record as well as how we can remove that pause button from the floor. So if I go to users, so here you can see this is now checked. This is checked. That is why so I'm just refreshing it. Okay, I need to open that flow again. So it is opening the version one. I'm going back. So if you want to open different versions, so what you can do click on this button view details and versions. So our latest version was version three. So we need to open that. So version three is activated. So I'm going to open it. So here you can see we are checking this checkbox which we are receiving here. If it is checked, then only this condition will be true. And then only user record will be updated and once it is updated. So this field will be having the value as true. So once all these parts are executed then next time when user will be logging in. So user won't see that screen.  Right now from screen if you want to remove this pause button. So you can configure the footer and you can just hide the possible. So only finish button will be there. So this way I just demonstrated you how you can configure your login flows and also remember the requirement of login flows. So I'm just going to show you that one more time. You can manage your login flows through this. You can use login flows to introduce business processes during login such as to prompt for multi-factor identification, accept terms of service or collect information about the user. After user complete the login flow they are logged in. This space lists available login flows and the user profile associated with each right. So this you need to take care while implementing login flows in Salesforce.