destruction. There would be peace from San Francisco to New York, to London, to Paris, and to Moscow. In Russia, too, they celebrated. The war was over and they showed their joy with a great military parade. Instead of dancing and singing, they marched each to his own taste, we thought. The war was over and American soldiers and sailors couldn't get home soon enough. There were families waiting, and the greatest military machine in history melted as we laid aside our arms. We thought the nations of the world had learned that the ways of peace are richer than war. Russian soldiers, too, would probably have liked to go home to their families. But Soviet leaders decided otherwise. Russia had gone into Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, and kept their military might to enslave these countries. The war was over. Of what use were military planes? In the United States, we set about destroying them more quickly than we made them. We used the metal to make pots and pans, bicycles and cars. The Russian leaders, too, wanted peace, they said. But they set about proving it in an odd way. They not only didn't destroy their planes, they kept on making more. War was over. And from the sands of North Africa to the jungles of the South Pacific, the materials of war were left to rot. This is the happy price of peace. There was peace. Yet in Moscow's Red Square, there was the ominous roar of the monsters of war. The war was over and the American people were glad to see the shells destroyed. There was peace. And the Russians proudly pulled their biggest guns through the streets. The Soviet leaders said they were for peace. And this was their proof. Did States believe there was a better way to show their will to peace? Over 10 million men were discharged from the armed forces. And in San Francisco, statesmen from 50 nations assembled to form the United Nations. Asia, Africa, South and North America came men of goodwill. There was hope that at long last, men had learned that aggression leads only to war. The work done, they signed the United Nations Charter to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war. To promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. To practice tolerance and live together in peace. This was the great hope of mankind. Russia too signed the Charter. In London, the United Nations got to work. It is not easy to undo the ravages of war. There was a great deal to do. Russia had emerged from the war in serious need of help. Through unlawed committees like this one. The United Nations provided relief. Russia received hundreds of millions of dollars of help. Most of this help came from the United States. When the Soviets get something for nothing, they're happy and cooperative. Shiploads of goods from America started pouring into Russia. American ships with American goods for the Russian people to help them recover from the wounds of war. To help them build a peaceful and richer life. From America came tractors to plow the Russian wheat fields so the Russians could have bread, boilers, tractors, motors, tools, medicines, leather, cloth, food, seeds, fertilizer. From the factories and fields of the United States, a flood of goods poured into Russia and filled thousands of warehouses. The United States wasn't the only country that helped Russia. From Brazil came food. From Canada, Great Britain, Australia, India, and many other democratic nations scattered all over the world. Goods were given to Russia to help feed the Russian people and to rebuild her factories, her cities, and her farms. From ship, to warehouse, to wagon, to store, and milk from the United States in a Russian store. And Papa Stalin smiles. Russia's leaders cynically accepted our aid to help rebuild. They continued to plan for world conquest, for peace. The world needs more food. The United Nations decided to work for more food. Russia walked out on this work. Relief is temporary. What the world needs is more food production. The United Nations set up the food in agricultural organization to help with advice and information. So observers traveling in various countries show farmers how to grow more food. Better food. The more food, the greater the chances for peace. Russia wanted peace, she said. But she wouldn't join in this work. The children of the world need more milk. Russia would not join in the work to achieve more milk. Playing bigger hogs produces more meat. All the nations of the world gain by working together through FAO. Russia refused. Second only to food is the problem of health. Russia wouldn't join in the work of the World Health Organization. The war left millions of children in need of medical care. Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Denmark, Greece, Poland, Hungary, and many other nations have benefited from WHO. Disease has no respect for geographic boundaries. But Russia would not join in this work. Another problem was the refugees. War victims with no place to go. Again, there was the empty Russian chair to end set up the International Refugee Organization. To give these people new hope for life, it taught them new trades to earn a living. It taught their children the language of the new lands they were going to. The International Refugee Organization gave hundreds of thousands of innocent victims of war a chance to start a new life. Oh, chartered a large fleet of ships. And more than 80 countries welcomed the refugees. Soviet Russia didn't admit a single one. Instead, she enslaved untold millions of Czechs, Hungarians, Germans, Poles, Greeks, Bulgarians. Over a quarter of a million refugees have already entered the United States. Russia didn't lift a finger to help. Russia has not joined in any of these works for peace. The United States has joined in all. There's an old proverb. Actions speak louder than words. There have been other ways in which the American people have worked for peace. One of the most important is the Marshall Plan. The nations of Europe needed American help. In Paris, statesmen got together to plan the economic recovery of Europe. Ernest Bevin represented Great Britain. Molotov came from Russia. There was danger of economic chaos in Europe and help was needed. The United States and the nations of Europe were ready to cooperate. But the Russians walked out. The nations of Western Europe went ahead without Russia. And soon the Marshall Plan goods started coming. Europe needed machines, steel, coal, generators, locomotives. Bridges and roads needed to be rebuilt. The whole of a war-torn economy had to be put back together again. Temporary relief was not enough. What was needed was to help Europe back on its feet again. Without help there was danger of chaos. Russia called American help to Europe warmongering. The Russians called rebuilding of houses warmongering. With the help of the Marshall Plan, railroads were electrified to save coal. War-torn roads were rebuilt. Working together, the Marshall Plan countries helped each other. Factories were rebuilt to make tires, wheels, gears, pistons, nails. All these were needed for recovery. To grow more food, irrigation canals and dams were built. Ships and docks were built. To survive, Europe needs to trade across the waters. Now at the end of three years, European agriculture, industry, exports and trade have greatly increased. And the damage of war is fast disappearing. Working together with the aid of the Marshall Plan, the nations of Europe have come a long way toward recovery. Recovery for peace. This is the Marshall Plan. Men and machines at work producing clothes, shoes, food, houses, machines all over Europe. Recovery was leading to new hope. And the Russians didn't like it. Remember Molotov walking out? When the Russian walkout failed to stop the Marshall Plan, orders went out to communist leaders to sabotage it. In France, the communist leader Thorez repeated the lines fed to him by his Russian bosses. In Italy, Togliatti incited the people to destruction and sabotage. The communists tried to stop economic recovery by strikes and riots. Why? Communists don't want recovery in Europe. They want poverty and chaos. In chaos, communists have the chance to seize power, to achieve power.  See what happened in Germany after the war. The Nazi lies and aggression had led to war. And in the end, the German people paid a heavy price. Once again, the nations of the world would have another chance to work for peace. As in Japan, there was an occupation. General Eisenhower represented the United States. There were, however, three other occupying nations. Great Britain, France and Russia. Germany was to be given a chance to become a peaceful member of the community of nations. They agreed that Germany was to be unified and given a peace treaty at the earliest possible date. American, British and French zones of Germany. There were free elections. The people voted for a government of their own choice. The ballots counted. Responsibility of government was given to German officials. The destruction of many years to rebuild. And the Western nation spent billions of dollars to help Germany back on her feet. As in the rest of Europe, ships, docks, trains and bridges had been shattered. The German people needed homes, clothes and food. They needed coal for heat and machines to dig coal. Needed coal to make steel and steel to dig coal. And the American people helped. They brought food. They didn't come as conquerors. They came to work for peace. What happened in East Germany, which was occupied by the Russians? German youth was taught to march with banners and to swear blind obedience to Moscow. Must have worked for a unified Germany and to give her a peace treaty. Instead, they taught German youth to fight and riot. So there can be no unity and no peace. Except on Russian terms. In 1948, the Russians tried to force the Western nations out of Berlin. They closed all means of transportation to starve the people into submission. But the Russians couldn't close the airways. 13 months. American and British planes flew in supplies to help a city keep alive. Russians were losing face before the world and they abandoned the Berlin blockade. Finally, let us see what happened in Japan. When the Americans first landed in the Japanese islands, there was a great deal of fear in Japanese hearts that the Americans came as conquerors to enslave them. Instead, the Americans came to help Japan back to the ways of peace. Working with Japanese representatives, food was brought from the United States. The main problem was to help the Japanese people to help themselves. There was much to be done. It takes many factories to build machines like these. Yet machines like these are needed. If Japan is to have prosperity, steel, rubber, and cotton are needed. And the American people have helped with supplies, machines, and technical help. The Japanese people have performed many miracles in rebuilding what war destroyed. It takes a lot of skill to build a ship or to make steel. And it takes a lot of time to heal the scars of war. There's a whole generation of young people who need training in the ways of peace. Schools and teachers are needed. American technicians have helped. American educators have trained Japanese teachers in democratic processes. To guard the health of the Japanese people, many more nurses are needed. American nurses have been sent to Japan to help train them. After a war, there is danger of epidemics. Typhus, malaria, cholera, tuberculosis. Equipment, drugs, hospitals, nurses, and doctors are needed. The American people have sent this help. Working together, Japanese and American doctors and nurses have done a heroic job. Democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. They keep it that way by free elections. As in Western Germany, the American occupation had a single purpose. To help the people back to peace. Under a government of their own choosing, Japanese people have come a long way in a few years. They have good reason to be proud. Americans believe that Japan has earned the right to a peace treaty. This was the purpose of the recent visits to Japan by John Foster Dulles. Ambassador Dulles went to Japan to explore the terms of a treaty which would bring Japan back into the fellowship of nations seeking peace through collective security. A peace settlement stated Ambassador Dulles should restore Japan to a position of dignity and equality among nations. Returning home, Ambassador Dulles said, American policy for Asia can be put in one word. Peace. But peace, said Ambassador Dulles, has been slow in coming because another great power talks peace and promotes war. Russia will not join in a peace treaty for Japan, said Jacob Malik, Russian spokesman. His bestia, official Soviet government paper, bitterly attacked the United States for seeking a peace treaty with Japan. Stalin, over 25 years ago, outlined the strategy of victory over the West through revolution in the East. The Soviet leaders saw that Chinese manpower would be good fuel for the furnace of violence they sought. In 1950, the first step in this new expansion was planned. An attack on South Korea, North Korean communists were summoned to Moscow. And an attack on the Republic of Korea was planned. A North Korean army was trained by the Russian military. And they were supplied with Russian planes, Russian tanks, and Russian guns. And while this was going on, the Russian leaders kept telling the world they worked for peace. The communists attacked South Korea and the United Nations went to her aid. The communist design of violent revolution was revealed in November 1950. The Chinese communists joined in open attack on the United Nations troops. Against all this, concluded Ambassador Dulles, stands the American effort for peace. This, the Japanese people have seen with their own eyes. The plans for a peace treaty for Japan go forward. The American people will persist. Until this purpose is achieved, they look forward to a peace of trust and opportunity. A treaty which will remove the moral scars of war and restore Japan as an equal in the community of nations. A treaty of peace that will give the young ones everywhere a more secure and happier life. This is the American will for peace.


This video will talk about solving exponential equations. When we were doing log equations, remember we had to isolate and get one log, a single log on one side. We want to do the same thing, we want to isolate the exponential term on one side and everything else on the other. And we've done some of these with light bases, but now we're going to come across problems where we can't really figure out what the same bases are. So if an exponential is base B, which is not 10 or E, then logs of the base can be used along with the change of base formula. So here we have a problem where we want to get to this exponential all by itself. So we need to add the 3 to the other side. So we're going to have 9 to the 3x is equal to 78,465 when I add 3 to both sides. And now I need to take the log with the same base. So log base 9 of 9 to the 3x is equal to, and I took the log base 9 on that side, I'm going to take the log base 9 on this side of 78,465. And this log and the base are inverses, so they undo each other and I have 3x is equal to log base 9 of 78,465. And then we have this case here now where we can convert this and change the base on it. That would give us the most exact answer that we could put in our calculator around if we wanted to. So we can say that this is 3x is equal to, remember it's the log of the argument, so log 78,465 over the log of the base, which is log 9. And then for our final answer then we just have x is equal to, and this whole thing divided by 3, and this is what we call an exact answer. We haven't rounded anything, it is an exact answer. So what are we going to do here when we have two bases but they're not the same? We can take any kind of log we want, it doesn't make sense for us really to go to log 7 or log 4 because we don't know anything about those. And we would have to convert later anyway, so why don't we just take a log. And we can take a log or a natural log. Some people like to do it, set it up as ln 7x is equal to ln 4 to the 2x minus 1, and some people would rather do it as the log of 7x is equal to the log of 4 to the 2x minus 1. It doesn't matter which method you use. Some people like to just use ln and then when they get to e they don't forget. So let's just do this one with an ln, we've done so many with logs before. Let's do this one with ln. So here is the equation I'm going to use, and we have the property that says log of a raised to the c is equal to c times the log of a. So we're going to use that property here. So x times the natural log of 7 is equal to, in parentheses, since more than one thing in that exponent, 2x minus 1 times ln 4. I got an x over here, but I also have an x in here. So that means that I need to distribute my ln 4 to both of those things, so I can get that x term out of the parentheses. So over here, I have x times ln 7, and that's going to be equal to, and then when I distribute, I will have 2x times ln 4, and then I will have minus 1, or just minus, if you prefer, ln 4. Now I've distributed, so I need to collect the x's. I will move this one to the other side. I'm going to subtract it. I will end up with x times ln 7, and then minus my 2x ln 4, and that will be equal to, on the other side, that negative ln 4. I have an x term here, and I have an x term here, and they have a greatest common factor of x, so I can factor that out. I have an x, and what do I have left over? Well, in here, I'm going to have, here's my common factor. So what's left is ln 7, and then here is my common factor of x, so what's left is minus 2 ln 4, and then on the other side, we still have minus ln 4. And then our final answer will give us that x, and that's going to be equal to what we had over on the other side, negative ln 4 divided by, and what do we have in blue down there? We have ln 7 minus 2 ln 4, and that would be our final exact answer. Okay, now take some time and try the next problem before you watch how the solution happens. Again, we have different bases, and this time we do have a base of E, so I definitely want to take, in this case, the natural log of both sides. And then we want to apply the property that says log A of C is equal to C, times the log of A. Again, we have parentheses here with an x inside it, and here's an x. So I need to distribute into my parentheses. I want to keep my x as positive if at all possible, so I'm going to take this term and go that direction, this term and go the other direction, which the x ln E stays on this side. And then I end up adding x ln 3, and that will be equal to, when I add it's 2 positive 2 ln E. So again, what did we do up here? We collected the x's on one side, and over here now we are going to take the greatest common factor. So we have a greatest common factor of x ln E plus ln 3. Cuz again, here's my greatest common factor, so that's on the outside. And then that will be equal to the 2 ln E. And so for a final answer, make sure that we can always see it. We keep our x, but we're going to divide everything off of it. So x is going to be equal to our 2 ln E divided by ln E plus ln 3. And I probably should have done it a lot earlier, cuz we have one more step. We have to remember here, the ln E, the exponent on E that will get me E is 1. So everywhere that I see that I had ln E, it's really just 1. This is a 1, and this is a 1. So my final answer should really be x is equal to 2 over 1 plus ln 3. That's the final answer.


Welcome to Whiteboard Friday. I'm Itamar Blower and today I'm going to be talking about EEAT quick wins that you can utilize to help your website appear more credible in the eyes of users and Google. So first let's start with a bit of context as to why this is all quite important. So with the helpful content updates that we've seen over the past 18 months, we've seen three of them which is quite significant. We've seen in August 2022, December 2022 and also again in September 2023. So seeing so many helpful content updates really warrants the question of, well actually there's something going on here but why is Google really trying to emphasize this to users? Obviously you can see this robot here. This is what Google is fighting with at the moment. With so many AI generated content, large language models being put into the mix, there's a lot of difficulty in terms of how you can distinguish in terms of whether a website is actually credible and real versus one that isn't and simply isn't actually helpful for users, hence helpful content updates. So let's bring this all into examples and we're going to use a YMYL niche of the medical niche for these examples to cover what exactly each individual letter in EEAT means. So first of all we're starting with experience. This is the newest one that was introduced and it's all about first-hand involvement in how you can actually demonstrate that you have experience in what you're writing about on your website. So an example in the medical niche could be having photos on your website where you're performing client diagnosis and things like that to actually demonstrate that you have experience working within this industry. The second one is expertise. And expertise is fundamentally important especially when it comes to YMYL niches because it's about showing high levels of skill. So certain ways to do that is if you have accreditations and degrees listed on your website so users can see that you know what you're talking about. You've been through the exams and you really do have that level of skill within your field. The third one is authority and this is all about how if you've been cited in certain publications and essentially websites that are really authoritative in your niche and this can come in the form of having relevant backlinks from credible sources in your industry. The last one is trust. So this is all about reliability and credibility. So this is where you want to exactly display to users why they should trust you and avoid ways that they wouldn't trust you such as 404 pages. The user's not really going to trust the website if they're landing on lots of 404 pages. Another example could be stock images. If you've got stock images on your website people can see that really clearly and they might just think you're not genuine enough and they can't trust you. So that's a breakdown of all of the letters within EEAT. So let's get into some EEAT quick wins. Quick win number one use real authors. This is fundamental when it comes to EEAT helpful content. Users want to be convinced that the person who's writing the content actually knows what they're talking about. So if you're not using real authors that's a problem because again it's something that people can see and they might not trust you. So use real authors whenever you can. The second thing is author bios. This is where instead of just having a name of an author you want to have a bio there so that users can read through and understand exactly why they should trust this person because then again that demonstrates what kind of experience and credibility they have. So all of these EEAT aspects. Third one is author pages. So once you've got your authors you've got their bios have an author page that's directly linked to that author so it specifies everything to do with their experience credibility. You can link out to other pieces of content they've written their social media profiles. That's another way to really help boost EEAT and it's something that users and Google love to see. Next we've got schema markup. So this is more for your search engines because schema markup is code that describes code. So you can use schema markup across your content across your author pages to specify who the person is who they are so Google better understands who the person is behind the content and what their credibility is fundamentally. Next we've got the inclusion of the time of edits within content. So say for example you're publishing medical related content. Things can change a lot within your within your niche and also there's lots of people that you might want to review the content. So this is where within your content you can specify who wrote the content when it was last edited who actually edited and revised that version of the content. So this is something that you can do as well to make it very clear for people in terms of knowing the sort of timeline of that content and that helps users and Google pull up more faith within that content itself. Next we've got using original images obviously no stock photos which means you should actually go out there get some original images that you can include within your content because that again adds a whole nother level of trust to users that you are who you say you are and people can actually see that on the page. Next get help from chat GPT. So this wouldn't be complete without talking about chat GPT in an AI world that we live in but chat GPT can actually help in terms of if you've got content written down you can put it into chat GPT and essentially ask it to critique it ask it based on EEAT signals and what they mean you can ask chat GPT to provide some further analysis and ways for you to improve that content. So that's a really useful tip that you've got there. The last one is if you don't actually have experts within your niche go hire them go reach out to your network go on certain websites and hire somebody to help you with the content even if they don't work for you full time just so you've got a bit of help from somebody who is an expert that really adds a lot because then you can use that and mention in your content that it was actually written alongside an expert in their field. So those are some EEAT quick wins but there are some things that you need to remember the first one is that quick wins does not equal laziness. So all of these tips here it actually requires some thought and it's not something that you can just go ahead and do in a lazy way because there have been real world implications where this has gone wrong and one example is Sports Illustrated that has somewhat recently used fake authors and has used AI generated content that didn't actually have a lot of sort of human due diligence or human additions to. So that's very important to keep in mind. The last one is that EEAT fundamentally is a must now for Google. So the recent edition of experience means that it's so important to have actual experience and specifying to users why you know what you know because you've actually been there and done it. So that's really important and it does warrant actual testimonials from people. So I hope you enjoyed this quick and short EEAT quick wins. I've been it to my blower. Thank you so much. And if you want to catch me online, ask any questions, feel free to reach out on LinkedIn.


I'm Chuck O'Brien. I'm Chuck O'Brien. He did. He did. He did. I had my butt. Alec Neumann. Paul. Paul. Stefan from Washington State. Go Barton. And Diwali. Before you start, I'd like to present you with the fly that we carried to the summit. And back at Jelly Bean. Who to say? Well, I thank you very much. I'm afraid to ask, I know the flag, but I'm afraid to ask if Jelly Bean's helped nourish you on the climb. You'd be surprised, though, we're beginning to run the government with them. They get us through a lot of late afternoon meetings. And be surprised at the very important affairs that are being discussed in the jar of Jelly Bean's is going around the table. And we, we always, I'm always interested in seeing the different styles. Some just grab a handful, and some pick each one out one at a time, or it's passed on. You know, the poet, William Blake, once wrote, Great things are done when men and mountains meet. And now I would add women to that statement and then say, all of you certainly proved him correct and even more than correct. And so it is with great pride that I accept this flag. By carrying it each step of your climb and planting it on top of Mount Rainier, you also planted courage and the capabilities of disabled people firmly in the minds of all Americans. Your triumph on Independence Day during this international year of disabled persons clearly illustrated the independence disabled people can achieve when given the opportunity. I take particular pride in fact, in fact that we have in our White House staff someone who also serves as an example of that independence and self-confidence that disabled people can attain. I'm talking about Hal Crence, who carried this flag to you on our behalf and I know he would have liked to have been on the mountain with you. Your 11-hour battle with snow, ice, and altitude while carrying 40-pound backpacks demonstrated to all of us that with spirit and determination, challenges are made to be met. We sometimes hear of the faith to move mountains well, you have the faith to climb mountains and that faith is in yourselves. When you came down from that mountain it wasn't the experience leading the disabled but rather those who could see leading those who could not those who could hear helping those who could not and the tremendous bond that was forged by this experience where you complemented each other and joined together to accomplish a great goal is a significant lesson on what all of us as Americans can accomplish if we work together. Nancy and I followed your progress and when you reached the top we with the rest of America shared your joy and were inspired by your courage and we also must acknowledge the courage of your families because we saw you too on television and on television heard through the radios the walkie-talkies that you were carrying the joy from the top of the mountain all of you and your shouts as they were heard down below I know there must have been some tense moments during the climb and that the support you received from your families was an important element in your success and I'm sure that Chuck O'Brien's twins will celebrate their birthdays with more than the usual sense of pride the corporations which sponsored this event believed in you we must all work toward seeing that all businesses appreciate the possibilities of the disabled as fully as those gathered here today as I stated in my February 6th proclamation of the International Year of Disabled Persons disabled Americans represent one of our most underutilized resources your successful Mount Rainier Ascent speaks more about the capabilities of our disabled citizens than any words can possibly state so congratulations and thanks to all of you for what you have shown and given to all of us and I should be very proud to keep this frame thank you very much thank you all for being here I think I better let you get into some shade now for this slightly different climate than Mount Rainier we should have brought you back part of the glacier right here in the rose dry air God bless you all thank you


Working remote is awesome. I get to wake up, run to my computer, get work done. Then for lunch, I get to eat amazing food. And after work, I get to go to the beach and enjoy whatever country I happen to be in. Fortunately, these days, there are a ton of jobs that will allow you to work remote and a lot of them tend to be high paying. And many of them don't require a college degree or previous experience. And in this video, I'm going to present 10 of the most common and best ones that I've found. And some of these jobs have the potential to make you more than a business owner. The first one I'm going to talk about is the easiest one for you to possibly get into. It's also going to be one of the lowest paying and that is customer service representative.  People might call into a company because they're having problems with a product or a service or they need technical support and you help them. Now, this one is probably going to be the least desirable one that you hear on the list. You're going to have to deal with Karen's all day, for instance. But the reason I kept it on the list is because of the fact that it's probably the easiest to land. Just about anybody can land a job doing customer service within a few weeks or a month. And this is typically a job that can be done remote or fully remote. And by the way, the difference between remote jobs and fully remote jobs is that remote, you typically do have to be within a certain area. So yes, you can work from your home or you can work from a coffee shop, but they might require that you're within the city or within the state or the country. Fully remote jobs, on the other hand, give you the ability to work anywhere in the world as long as you can do the job during the times that they tell you to. So if you're somebody who wants to travel the world, you would want to go for a fully remote job. And customer service representatives or customer care support, they're going to make around $39,000, $40,000 a year. So it's not great, but at the same time, it is a job you can land really quickly. And then once you land it, you can start looking for better ones. Overall, I'm going to give this one a five out of 10 when it comes to the money score. Next one on the list is going to be a human resource assistant. Now, of course, you'd start off as a human resource assistant. And then eventually you might work into the higher level HR roles, which tend to be really well paying. And human resources is exactly what it sounds like. Basically, you're going to be helping with hiring people, firing people, making sure that everyone is compliant. And according to LinkedIn, 85% of HR professionals claim that they can work effectively with a remote arrangement. Now human resource assistants do make about $45,000 a year. So it's a little bit better. This one, I'm going to give a four out of 10 when it comes to the money score. Next one on the list is a sales development representative. And this is one I've talked about quite a bit on this channel. Another name for this one is business development representative. And this is essentially a tech sales role. And what SDRs and BDRs focus on is not so much closing sales, but they focus on prospecting and getting leads. So they connect with as many people as they possibly can. A lot of the time that's going to be through email or LinkedIn. And then they would pass those people off to more experienced salesmen. Now, this is a role where I've interviewed people on this channel where they have literally gotten a job in two weeks. I think the craziest interview I did was with Della. She got a job in about a month and a half and she was making over $100,000 a year. Like imagine that she literally went from a stay at home mom with no experience to making over $100,000 a year in a month and a half. That is the kind of opportunity that you see as an SDR. And typically they will leave you to your own devices, but you have to perform. This is not one of those roles where you can just show up to work, do maybe an hour or two of work and then you're done. This is one of those roles where you absolutely have to perform. But with that being said, SDRs make about $78,000 a year. There's also a ton of room for moving into other positions that pay even better. It's also one of the most valuable skills you can learn in general. Almost all billionaires say that they had some sort of sales role in their background and there's probably a reason for that. This one gets a 10 out of 10 money score. Next one on the list is going to be an accounts receivable specialist. And basically with this role, you're going to be taking care of all sorts of different invoices or past due payments. And in some cases you might help to negotiate contracts as well. So somebody was supposed to pay for some sort of service that you gave them. They're six months past due, a year past due, you would be reaching out to them and telling them, Hey, you need to pay this. If you don't pay it, it's going to start compounding. And if you don't pay it after a certain amount of time, we're going to have to send it to a debt collection agency. Now, this is another one of those roles where you can very easily work remotely. There's pretty much no reason why you would ever have to come into the office for this one accounts receivable specialist make about $45,000 a year. There are other roles that you can move into that pay much better than that. Also, depending on the industry or the company that you work for, you can get paid a lot more. But yeah, this one, I'm going to go ahead and give it a five out of 10 money score. Next one on the list is going to be an email marketing assistant. Now this is one where you would start off as an assistant learning email marketing and helping experienced email marketers. But eventually you would move into higher level roles. And I can tell you right now, email marketing is one of the most valuable skills that you can learn. I think I've heard estimates that for every $1 that's spent on email marketing, you get $30 to $35 back. And those estimates are actually on the lower side. So of course, you have to do the work, right? You have to create the content in order to market via email, but it is incredibly lucrative. Typically, if you even get like, you know, a dollar 20 back, if you spend $1 for many businesses, that's actually going to be worth it. So if we're talking about getting 30, 40 X back on your money, that is why this skill is so valuable. Now email marketing assistants make about $53,000 a year. So that's pretty good for something you can get into relatively easily right off the bat. This also does fall under the umbrella of digital marketing, which is something that I have talked about quite a bit on this channel. Digital marketing is one of the best skills you can learn and one of the best careers you can get into, especially at the entry level. And as I've mentioned before, my friend Seth is probably the best in the world at getting people digital marketing jobs. I'll put a link to his free masterclass down in the description, as well as the pinned comment below. He's going to go over the different types of digital marketing and the best ways to get into them. So overall, I'm going to give this one a nine out of 10 when it comes to the money score. Next one on the list is going to be a junior underwriter. Now what junior underwriters do is they basically review loan applications and make sure that the information on those applications is correct. So not only are you making sure that the application itself is correct, but you're also making sure that the person who applied is telling the truth, right? So there's a little bit of kind of private investigator stuff going on here, like you are going to kind of look into the person and make sure that if they say they're making $100,000 a year, they actually are. So junior underwriters make about $64,000 a year. This is one you can get into relatively easily and it's one that you can oftentimes do remotely. There's really no reason you have to be in an office for this one and a lot of businesses will let people work remote. So this one, overall, I am going to give an eight out of 10. Next one on the list is going to be a quality assurance analyst. This is another one I've talked about on this channel. It can be a phenomenal career to get into. And basically, your job here is to make sure that there are not going to be any bugs or identify problems that might happen in software before they actually happen. Or if they do actually get out to the customer to fix it as quickly as possible. So for instance, for some reason, over the last six months, my bank account, whenever I log in on my online portal, will not let me transfer money from one account to the other. Clearly, my bank has not hired enough quality assurance analysts because I have to do everything on my phone instead of logging in on my computer. But anyways, quality assurance analysts make about $68,000 a year. So this is a super valuable position. And the reason it's so valuable is not only does it help a company get products out faster. So for instance, maybe you get a product out a week or a month faster, which could possibly make you millions more dollars. But on top of that, it's going to decrease churn because customers get incredibly annoyed when stuff doesn't work when software is malfunctioning or there's bugs and stuff like that. A lot of customers are just going to go to a competitor. Now I'm going to go ahead and give this one a nine out of 10 on the money score. And the next one is very similar to quality assurance analyst. And that is quality assurance data engineer. And they basically do very similar things, but they work specifically with data, which requires a certain skill set. So if you're working with data, you're going to have to really know your stuff when it comes to statistics. And there's usually specific types of software you're going to have to be very proficient with. So quality assurance data engineers make about $79,000 a year. This one is a little bit more difficult to get into, but super valuable one. This one also gets a nine out of 10 money score. Next one on the list is going to be a webinar producer. Now this is one you've probably never heard of. Basically, this is very similar to an event planner or an event coordinator, but they do it with online events. So running a webinar, especially if there is a bunch of different people that are speaking and there's hundreds or thousands of people that are watching you live can be very stressful. And not only do you want to take care of the technical side of things, aka making sure everything is running smoothly. But on the other side, you also want to make sure that the people who are watching the webinar have a good experience. And of course, this one can be done remotely. And webinar producers earn about $66,000 a year on average. This one, I'm going to give a nine out of 10 money score. Next one on the list is a medical assistant. So this is another one where you can get into relatively easily sometimes with a short certification process. And there are certain types of medical assistant jobs that can be done remotely. So for instance, calling people to remind them to take their medications, calling people to remind them to go to their doctor's appointments, etc. And this is actually one of the fastest growing jobs. According to BLS, it's growing at about 29% over the next 10 years. And medical assistants make about $38,000 a year. Now I'll be honest with you, the entry level jobs aren't going to be one of the better ones on the list, but I do see a lot of higher paying jobs popping up down the line. And I also wanted to include this one to show you that it's not just business, technology, entertainment, marketing, etc. type jobs that you can do remote, even medical jobs you can do remote sometimes. So for instance, before I quit my job as a pharmacist, there were times when I was working remote. So I'll give this one a five out of 10 when it comes to the money score. Check this video out right here. I made it just for you. Go ahead, gently tap that like button, hit the subscribe button, ring the notification bell and comment down below any thoughts, comments, criticisms, etc. And I will see you next time.


Jmovi makes it easy to share files by simply emailing or putting in a shared box the file that you've been working on because it has the data, it has the transformation, it has the analyses. There is, however, a really interesting, more sophisticated alternative to that. And it's called the open science framework. And if you want to go here to osf.io, I can show you a little bit about how it works and how Jmovi is very well adapted to it. The open science framework is a free service that really facilitates collaboration and reproducibility and research. You can create a free account. And one of the important things here is that it allows you to integrate a number of other services. So for instance, maybe use Dropbox or Google Drive or Box. It can bring files in from those. Or if you're the programmer type, you might use GitHub or Amazon Web Services. Again, those are integrated. Now, I personally like to upload files one by one into osf. That way I have a better sense of what's there. I don't put something in a folder by accident. But this is a way to share your work, both with specific other people for collaboration, and to share your results with the world. I want to show you how this works by having to go to an example. If you go to this web address bit.ly slash Jmovi dash OSF for open science framework, I've set up a read only access to my files here so anybody can look at it. They can see what's there. They can't change it. But this is a great way of collaborating. And right now I've got the files from the first chapter on the Jmovi course. And one of them is sharing files.omv. Now you may remember what this looks like in Jmovi itself. Right here, we've got the iris example data. And I've got some charts that are broken down by categories. I got some statistics. Let me show you what those look like when we're in OSF. If you click on this file right here, it's going to open up in your browser. I've got it open already. So I'm just going to move over. And here what you have is an exact reproduction of the results that we have. We have the same table. It looks exactly the same. And we push it down a little bit. We have the same charts. And it's all there. And in fact, even though people can't modify it, they can download it. And then they can open it themselves in Jmovi and start working with the data and see what they can get out of it. And so this is a wonderful way of collaborating and sharing results with people. And Jmovi is one of the few programs that opens its files natively in OSF that makes it so easy to share. One other thing I want to point out is because this is just a web page. Not only does it work on a browser like a Mac Windows or a Chromebook, it even works on smartphones. You can open it on an iPhone or an Android or a tablet, and you'll get the same results and you can explore and share the results that way. So if you want to have a step up in your collaboration and in your sharing and really a way of disseminating the research, OSF, the open science framework, can be an excellent alternative that works so well with Jmovi.


Welch yn y Toffey TV, mae'r Evern News Daily. Evern have announced their books for the 2021 season and they've reported losses of £120.9 million for that financial year. Evern have said Covid-19 impacts. I've been taking into account with that, that's the reason why the losses are so big. They said the inability to generate revenue due to Covid-19 has had a detrimental effect on Evern's books. This was highlighted by gate receipts being just £0.2 million for the whole season. I think they're normally around £15 million, so that shows you the impact of that. I've just not simply not having the ability to create that kind of money and it all adds up of course. Obviously there was a retraction in the transfer market as well which stopped the ability to sell players and generate money from that. The prices just way in their teams didn't have as much expendable income to be able to buy players as well so obviously that impacted Evern as well in the whole scenario. Covid has made a huge dent in this as with other clubs as well. The club did however report a record turnover of £193.1 million so obviously improvements there but when you look at the overall pitch yet it's not great. The biggest, the kind of clearest message from this is that Evern simply have to generate more money. Yes there is the caveat of Covid being in there and putting that financial hole in there but Evern do have to create money. Farad Meshiri also put £100 million into the business for shares so there is that as well but Evern need to create a situation where they become self-sufficient. You can't always rely on an owner and these financial numbers, financial results basically say that. Yes it's been a really difficult time with Covid-19 but Evern do have to get better on and off the pitch and create more money to run as a sustainable business because quite simply isn't sustainable if it continues to lose the amount of money it's losing. Hopefully there'll be nothing like Covid and the effects that Dara's had on it going forward and this will be just one of those times in the history where things were great and Evern improved from but right now we need to get better at everything we do. Stan Collymor has claimed that Deli Alley should consider retiring from football at the age of 25 if his heart still isn't in the game. Collymor's speaking about the fact that Alley hasn't started the game for Evern since joining from Spares on Deadline Day in January and says he has to ask himself serious questions about whether he's still got the desire to play in the Premier League, desire to play at the top level and if he hasn't maybe retirement because the way he went on to quote Ash Barty who of course it was a women's tennis player that retired as the world number one, age 25 and said if your heart isn't in it at that top level then you need to be prepared to walk away. So to Deli, Evern have got 11 games left this season, we've got to get points on the board, we need them to come up big and score some goals and then maybe that will help and reclaim his form and settle all this talk down. I'm going to talk about him over the last two or three weeks. Omer Evern player, Luca Dean has spoken out about leaving Evern in January and how his relationship with Rafa Benitez broke down. He was speaking to Laquip in France while he was away on international duty and said that he questioned Rafa Benitez's tactics, felt that Evern could have more possession than what the Spaniard wanted and said from there they fell out basically and then it ended up with Luca Dean leaving the club. He's already come out and said he didn't want to leave Evern and you know we felt as though one man had ruined this whole relationship with the football club which is sad really. Benitez of course, I mean the most gallwn thing I think for Evertonians and Luca Dean was a week after selling Luca Dean Benitez was sacked and we have missed Luca Dean let's be honest since he's gone but that is it he's moved on and we have to too I guess. Evern have made more progress at Bramley Morddoch regarding their stadium construction with the installation of the fourth core which means that there's now four corners of the structure that are above ground. It's really taking shape down there now. You know you watch any of the drone footage it's incredible. Evern have got a video on their website as well today talking about this latest milestone and Alango Roach official called it a huge milestone in the building of Bramley Morddoch Stadium. So go and check that out you'll be able to see all of the footage of that on Evern's website. Robin Olson who spent last season on loan at Everton said that he wanted to stay at the club and was very happy at Everton but things changed during the summit and he wasn't able to remain at the club. Olson then moved to Roma and has now joined Aston Villa on loan in January but it did a good job for Everton last season when he was called upon did Robin but yeah he's at Villa now. And finally Dominic Calvert-Lewin's agent says that he isn't a absolute rubbish that he assigned any contract or any agreement with another club. He said that Evern's number nine is focusing on finishing the season strongly with Everton and helping his club improve and climb up the table.  That is it for the Everton News Daily give the video a thumbs up, subscribe if you haven't if you want more videos join us on Patreon the link is in the description. See you later.


When one explores the most fascinating and ancient structures resting all over our planet, you will inevitably be confronted by baffling feats on engineering and ingenuity, tasks that, to modern math, escape understanding or, indeed, explanation. The main consensus regarding these ancient structures has always been a tricky thing to explain. To claim that these marvelous structures were built by primitive people with only primitive tools at their disposal does not only seem absurd to most who have visited such sites, but ignorant of their true past grandeur and the specific characteristics of each of these places. Ancient sites, such as Giza, Machu Picchu, among many others, still contain very confusing artifacts, anomalous evidence, which tells a very different story to that of mainstream history. Apart from the Baghdad Battery, largely claimed to have been an ancient form of electroplating, there has been little in the way of physical evidence to suggest the use of electricity within the academically researched ancient times. Yet, there are many remnants left, which suggest such activities. Not only are there countless clear examples of past machine work stone, but most importantly, there is evidence of errors made by these same tools, mistarts, and discovered fault lines. These particular stones discarded, laid bare in the quarries, revealing all the hallmarks of the machine engineering that went into building these wonderful places, these artifacts, once rubbish, now historical treasures. They can tell you the shape and movements of the tools that were being used, showing just how these machines cut into the stones, core drillings also discarded during manufacture, and cut stones discarded due to faults and cracks, revealing the complete preliminary cut marks left by the ancient stone cutters. These fragments of past activities are clearly some of the most important in unraveling these sites' ultimate secrets, yet it is rarely shared in the public arena and even less frequently researched by official bodies. Along with this vast and perplexing array of remnants, mercilessly left where they fell, strewn amongst the debris of disruption, lay countless extremely hardy machine stone jars, vessels made from some of the hardest rocks on earth. Some of these jars were made with a round bottom, perfectly machined, balanced on a base no bigger than the tip of a chicken's egg. Sir William Flinders Petrie ultimately realized that only lathe turning could have produced the symmetry and balance found on thousands of these bowls and vases, and Petrie was no fool. In 1894 he founded his own archaeological body, the Egyptian Research Account, which later became the British School of Archaeology in Egypt. He stated, for example, a bowl maker attained curves of exact circularity by rotating the bowl around a fixed blade, and formed a lip by shifting the centering of the bowl. Another round bottom vase had walls of such uniform thickness that it balanced perfectly on a curved base. To have a very well-respected researcher and specialist of the ancient Egyptians to admit to a conviction of the use of power tools in these pots construction seems like quite a stunning position to take, especially when one considers that while metal chisels could have been used to shape soft limestone within ancient Egyptian times, the metals that were available to them, copper, bronze, and during the 1st millennium BCE, wrought iron, were far too soft to work such rock into such exquisite designs. It seems Petrie would like to remain honest regarding his conclusions, yet also incomplete with his explanations, preferring to let the receiver of said information make their own realizations, preferring to avoid complication by a, by this time, rather visible enemy. One could only conclude that these relics and ancient monuments thereof were not the work of the Egyptians, but further evidence to suggest that these baffling structures were built far before the ancient Egyptians, before academic understandings by a highly technologically advanced pre-cataclysm civilization. We find it difficult to see how such work was undertaken, or an explanation for our finding can be made without the use of power tools. Thankfully, the more we learn regarding these enigmatic places, the more we become aware of regarding their true history, and the closer it seems we become to finding those who built them. When asked what are the largest, heaviest, and indeed the once most difficult stones to ever have been cut, transported to, and precisely placed within the great structures of the Giza Plateau, we would have previously stated that the granite ceiling blocks found within the king's chamber in the Great Pyramid were the largest known, with some of these stones weighing as much as 100 tons. However, it turns out that there exist many other stones upon this mysteriously created plateau, which far exceed the pyramid's inner megaliths. Unsurprisingly, these discoveries are rarely shared academically, or indeed to the many people who pay to visit the Giza Plateau each year. The Valley Temple is but one example of these other, less mentioned, marvelously enormous stones, eight of which are still present within the structure's ruin, the largest of which still being roughly 3x3x6 meters in size. Furthermore, the same similarly sized stones can also be found within the Kefren Pyramid Causeway Temple. The structure is also rarely discussed or shared by Egyptologists or archaeologists alike. It seems that academics who fear a loss of funding from particular bodies tend to merely ignore that which they are confronted with, which they simply cannot explain. Again, the same enigmatic megalithic blocks can be found in the Causeway Temple of the Miserinus Pyramid. One finds the same highly eroded, thus extremely ancient stones. It seems that these huge stones seemingly litter the Giza Complex, and amazingly, they are successfully ignored merely due to their controversy. Yet, the largest to be found anywhere upon this man-made plateau are to be found hidden in plain sight. Overlooked for many millennia, the still remaining foundation stones upon which much of the east side of the Kefren Pyramid once stood were not lifted into place, but were indeed transported to this location and precisely placed into position. These stones are so massive and so perfectly dropped into the surrounding landscape that thousands of people have walked right over them every year without ever realizing what they were standing on. Although the true depth and thus complete scale of the block is currently unknown, if it is of a cubic shape, it would appear to be roughly three-quarters the weight of the pregnant woman of Baalback. She weighs around 1,001 tons, which would make our foundation stone anywhere from 500 to 750 tons in weight. Clearly, a controversial yet incredible discovery, one which takes our understandings of the sheer undertaking that was Giza, are still at an early stage. Nonetheless, such discoveries move us one step closer towards finally understanding just who could have built the Great Pyramid Complex of Egypt. Many ancient sites found all over the world can no longer be explained away with currently attested academic opinion, who they say built them, why, or when they were created. The most popular of these anomalies are the ancient monuments that can be found upon the Giza Plateau. Currently explained as having been built by our copper-tua-wielding ancestors a mere 4,000 years ago, somehow successfully creating some of the most precisely built and indeed enormous ancient structures found on Earth, decidedly choosing to use granite blocks many tons in weight as their building material of choice. Ironically, although these sites are somehow exclaimed as having been built by the ancient Egyptians, any actual literal explanation of how this was actually done has never been provided. Not only is academic opinion severely lacking any logical understandings as to the construction of these sites, they seemingly attempt to ignore, and in some cases conceal, additional controversial anomalies they simply cannot understand. Enormous stone megaliths are hidden all over Giza, and especially around the base of the Great Pyramids, and not only were these buildings adorned with incredibly hard granite but also basalt, a similarly tough stone, and another which would be near impossible to have hewn with mere copper implements. Known as Giza's basalt floor, it is what many people now see as the smoking gun for evidence of advanced engineering having once been responsible for the construction of the site. Amongst the remaining fragments of the basalt floor is overwhelming evidence of ancient machinery telltale precision signatures left on many stones, suggesting high technology was responsible for the shaping of Giza's enormous stones. Cut marks that could only have been left by high-speed disc-cutting, striations, precise ridges, and countless other curious features have been thankfully left upon these stones, and these surviving tool marks could one day be used to actually identify the technology once used to build the site. We now feel that the evidence to suggest that the modern attested and masked published theories regarding the origins of the Giza Plateau, its age, and indeed its creator's past capabilities, is currently incorrect and is now overwhelming, and that it is only a matter of time before a revival of this past knowledge and indeed understandings again begins to flourish. Egypt, undoubtedly one of the most controversial places for modern history to try to keep the control of in regards to its origin, its true age, or original builder. When one either visits the Giza Plateau and is lucky enough to gaze upon these three great pyramids or merely able to peer upon them through their computer screens, the first thing that will usually cross one's mind is awe and amazement, yet this is often instinctually followed by an air of wonder, a curiosity as to how these miraculous structures were built, who could have possibly built them, and most importantly of all, why. Yet these questions, and indeed the pursuit of their answers, has been a mission for many well-funded deceptive individuals for many years to work very hard to distract you from either asking or pursuing as personal line of inquiry. For example, the Golden Mask of King Tut, along with the many other undoubtedly spectacularly valuable artifacts encrusted with precious metals and jewels that can be seen littering Egypt in its many museums and in the mountains of literature, books, and touring exhibits, which are published, pushed, and permitted in regards to this spectacular area of human history. Today, the sixth and the last chariot of King Tutankhamen from the military museum in the Cetadel, which is worth there since 1987, to the gem. So we were keen to show you the moving of this very nice artifact and the packing and unpacking method, professional method you are using by my colleagues in the ministry. The Tutankhamen exhibit comprising about 5,000 pieces will display for the first time all of Tutankhamen's artifacts in one place. Experts from around the world have been consulted on how best to preserve and display the collection. When museum workers accidentally knocked off the beard of King Tut's burial mask in 2015 and hastily glued it back on, there were fears that modern chemicals would cause permanent damage to the artifact, but scholars around the world put their heads together to save the golden mask. The museum will also be a venue for international conferences on Egyptology. There is something in you always. We found out today in my talk the family of Tutankhamen through the name, how Tutankhamen died, no one murdered him. My excavation and the well of the monks that we are doing right now, important excavation looking for the tomb of Arkhiz and Hamun, maybe soon a tomb will be revealed in the valley of the monks or the western valley of the kings. Most of the artifacts in the Tutankhamen exhibit have been relocated from the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. Their new home is only about 2 kilometers away from the place where the young Pharaoh's tomb was discovered in 1922. Egyptian officials say the gem will be the world's largest archaeological museum when completed and will hold about 100,000 artifacts in total. We have now 3000 employees and workmen working inside the project. We are respecting our schedule, we'll be ready from the engineering part by December 2018 and we are deciding now the perfect time or the ideal timing for the partial opening. In addition to King Tut's exhibit, the museum will display objects related to some of the greatest historic Egyptian kings, such as Ramses II, Akhnaten and Amenotep III. The ancient Egyptians, although claimed as ingenious, were merely adaptive, just like the equally acclaimed Romans and Incas of Peru. These re-inhabitants merely rediscover the creations of a far older, far more advanced predecessor, who I believe not only constructed these sanctuaries, which these well-studied ancient civilizations merely used to enable the flourishment of their own cultures, in turn leaving a smorgas board of architectural artifacts for funded academics to excavate and subsequently parade around, usually bombarding many individuals with deep insights into their lifestyles, culture and death practices, are yet, as I would have predicted, nearly always absent, that which supports my posit. Any logical explanation or demonstration of how these people built these structures in which they once inhabited, like a void in their academic study, one which is not only consistently ignored and concealed by these same academics, but are unknown facts to all of modern humanity to this day. This mystery is a result of the incredible nature of these structures, the precision involved in their constructions, and the enormity of some of the stones used in the building of the structures. Many of you may have seen my recent videos, or be a keen follower of my work, and as such, are aware of the fact that due to my in-depth study of the unknowns regarding these sites worldwide, and the collection and collaboration of the similarities and differentiabilities I have personally collected and categorized regarding many of these ancient structures, I have personally been able to establish a very strong evidence-based hypothesis regarding the identity of three separate law civilizations, which I have established using signatures within their style of building, and by default, differentiations in their styles of building, to unquestionably identify them as separate yet particular groups responsible for the different unexplainable structures spanning the entire globe. Yet although these groups have indeed crossed paths, such areas as Aswan Quarry and most significant to my own research in Italy, where the polygonal civilization built upon the Cyclopians' work, allowing me to establish which preceded which, and although these groups have been established to have abandoned projects midway through, thus indicating that they came to a sudden and untimely demise due to cataclysm. The civilization responsible for the pyramids, and indeed the movement of the blocks at Baalbeck in China, which all far exceed 1,000 tons, is yet another civilization which far predated all which I have already identified. These three civilizations are the polygonal civilization, the Cyclopian civilization, and the Neolithic civilization, each with their own unique building techniques and identifiable stone-cutting signatures in their technologies. The pyramid builders were unimaginably more capable than all three, and although the Neoliths, who indeed have created some astonishingly advanced ruins, could have quite possibly been a surviving remnant of this civilization, this digression is for another time. Though at sites such as Baalbeck, the trilithon, which contains stones over 1,000 tons, there are Cyclopian stones built atop the stones, and at other places in the world polygonal masonry has been found, such as Aksum in Ethiopia, where the toppled obelisk is said by some to be in excess of 1,000 tons. I have never, and now strongly feel will never, find any indicative evidence of these civilizations building the footings under any of these gigantic megaliths, as they were not responsible for their creation or placement. Additionally, the civilization responsible for the pyramids, and these enormous megalithic blocks elsewhere, were also the civilization who created the false door. A mysterious rock carved feature, also found littering the now exposed mega metropolis found beneath the Guatemalan rainforest by penetrative radar. Taikal, part of this metropolis, the place where the plaque illustrating a past global cataclysm was once found, also has pyramids built solely leading to these false doors, with one found in Peru, built into the only rock face containing a very peculiar crystal known for its resonance qualities in amplifying radio waves. I feel that much of the spectacles found in modern Egyptian museums are merely distractions from the really important truths which we should all be focusing on instead. Such as the true age of the pyramids, structures which in the past I have also independently identified as still possessing three separate identifiable stages of attempted casing stones for conservation, each significantly older or younger than each other, with the true exoskeleton of the structures made of stones far in excess of 1,000 tons. Join us next time where I will expose the controlled opposition within the fringe fields of archaeology which have stemmed from a growing pursuit for the truth of these facts, with a focus upon the water erosion hypothesis of the Great Sphinx, why it is a misdirection, and the Sphinx's true, original, undeniable identity, facts and truths exposed, which are undoubtedly highly compelling. There are so many astonishing, seemingly unexplainable features of the Great Pyramids of Giza. It makes one wonder why anyone would still believe the academics' tale of events, stating that they were the work of copper-wielding ancestors many thousands of years ago, and to sit across such vast area of land, with the largest Chiops covering many acres, yet is no more than a quarter of an inch from being perfectly cardinal aligned, just seems like a preposterous premise to push. In the previous video, the astonishing similarities that many years of exhausting research surrounding the unexplained ruins was explained, how M.H. the channel's producer had catalogued and mapped a number of identifiable features across many ruins. Each of these identifying characteristics uniquely exclusive to one ancient civilization found upon and within unexplained ancient ruins across the entire globe. These signatures' similarities, and by default, their many differentiations, has allowed him to establish the identity of three separate civilizations. Civilizations which appear to have restarted consecutively, thus, as one would expect, branched off in vastly different directions of development, having to rebuild a modernized society from the remnants of the previous. Their past existences denied by historians for many years, but I strongly believe that we will be the generation which bucks the trend, shifting a paradigm which has affected nearly everyone's lives negatively in some way. As critical mass awareness approaches, as we continue to push onwards, regardless of their attempts to stifle the truth, the efforts and sacrifices made, and given by individuals who perceive this deceit as a breach of all of our independent liberty as human beings, is finally cracking their shields of ignorance. Predictably, these same institutions who have made lives so difficult are now slowly admitting they did indeed once exist. The proof of these separate groups, which Mystery History's producer named the Cyclopean, Polygonal, and Neolithic civilizations, all had advanced capabilities, each separate from each other, yet fortunately each possessing their own unique identifiable features, which still litter many of these existing sites. Impenetrable fortresses, ingenious architectural design, visually impressive and mentally baffling methods of masonry are just a few of these ancient civilizations' legacies. Polygonal masonry, for example, yet to be fully understood by modern man in regard to its construction. The Treasury of Atreus, which contains Cyclopean masonry techniques displaying intimate knowledge of weight-bearing architecture, which the academically-attested builders simply did not possess knowledge of. Underground towns and cities, the town in which the Flintstones inhabited, carved deep into some of the toughest bedrocks on earth. Derencuyu, being one of the largest, which instead of being a fortress built above the ground, placed in a strategic location atop a hill or mountain, was carved into the earth. To claim such feats were even possible by our own well-known ancient ancestors with the access to the tools they had at the time is simply a preposterous illogical stance to take. One which, if given as the answers to such sites' origins, can be seen as nothing short of the abandonment of one's senses in return for an undisturbed income flow. A ridiculous explanation for the city's origins forced upon the academic world for fear of losing their income and career, and in turn down the throats of students who desire good grades. Stretching many kilometers into the earth, enormous rolling stones were placed at strategic passageways, and although we have no idea how they move such stones, they were clearly placed there in an attempt to stop some form of invader, one they felt as if such measures were not undertaken, would have been vulnerable to. They hypogeum in Malta, with acoustic properties which we are yet to fully understand. The subject of our next video, with some astonishing discoveries we have unearthed during further research of this underground layer. These ancient sites tunneled deep underground, rumored to have been lit by miraculously clever, naturally-fed gas-fueled lighting systems, balanced flames eternally lighting the inhabitant's pathways. Yet, as mentioned in our previous investigative film, the pyramid builders were responsible for the movement of stones, which reach well into the thousands of tons, setting them quite literally a world apart in their eventual technological capabilities. And due to our identification of no less than three separate phases of casing stones adorned upon the Great Pyramids, which due to the decayed and incredibly eroded condition of the stones beneath them, with casing stones also varying in age, it appears clear that they were all possible conservation efforts, undertaken at different times within ancient man's past, after no less than three cyclical developments of our civilization. These factors, mystery, history not only perceives as clear evidence supporting the hypothesis of multiple lost generations, but also clearly displays their different methods of accomplishing these tasks. Furthermore, they can clearly show all who wish to study them, whether attempting to amass, as the channel has, a large, privately-held collection of proofs, evidences, and upart studies that were hidden all over Earth regardless of one's reasoning. I implore all to merely study the casing stones of Giza's pyramids, for more than enough proof of many lost civilizations, and the pyramids and their past builders' tremendous age. Additionally, we want to make it clear to all that we encourage discourse, the organically grown nature of the channel's demographic, is its most important characteristic. We do not reject other people's disagreements to anything presented, or that is claimed on occasion, as long as they are willing to attempt constructive discourse in the pursuit of that which is the ultimate goal, the truth. If you have made a private discovery, or would prefer subjects or opinions to be shared with the Creator with discretion, need advice or assistance regarding historical issues in any way, get Mystery History's opinion on something, don't hesitate in contacting him, the antiquarian Creator who runs the show. This can be done via private email correspondence, Facebook, or Patreon. He does take a while to get back to you, but he always does. The channel, with hard-earned, hard-fought work and determination, has finally established a decent foothold in the doorway of antiquity, presenting ruthlessly logic, non-conclusive, rationally-grounded ponderings which are solely based upon facts, facts the Old Order have no answers to. Thus, the channel's content is now the front-runner in this cause-and-effect paradigm shift, slowly being witnessed all over the world. The consequential loss of academia's undeserved credibility, built upon a false persona of all knowingness, slowly being realized by more and more people every day as a fraudulent attempt to profit from misplaced faith, thus public support and belief in their opinion, diminishes by the day. Now perceived as a dangerous, highly efficient, naturally talented distributor and conveyor of the seeds of doubt, which sprout many curious, yet logically sound questions, continues to cast this cloud of intellectual uncertainty over academia, and those who are deservedly exposed as mere regurgitators of permitted information. Or a book pusher, whose sole content is to pick on easy targets, while offering no solutions to that which they object to with such vitriol, feeding from a sour cream which they skim from the top of a divisive status quo, offering no alternatives, or even instilling any passion to have any positive effect in any way. They merely profit from their obedient maintenance of a division within our species, ultimately slowing our prosperity and moralities to a near stagnation. By sticking to my ethics and being completely honest regarding every subject, every word spoken, subject by subject, we are now the forerunner in our field, a starter pack of our hidden past, with a new sister channel which stitches each journey together into larger historical picture fashioned as hour-long multi-subject feature-length films, so regardless of your own particular format preference, the channel now caters. However, although we may have established a large seat at the table, many individuals who masquerade as having the same mission at heart are nothing but saboteurs and moles, attempting to lead its followers on a wild goose chase, diverting traffic away from burning curiosities, controlled opposition within the derogatory labeled field of fringe research, an audacious choice of wording, as it is an accusation by funders who intentionally permit only a certain area of global history to be studied, something which is far more fitting to the label fringe researcher than any astute individual who grew weary of their lack of knowledge with the method of construction of chiops being just one among many thousands worldwide. And as promised, I will now expose one of these moles, their methods of misdirection, and how to spot them yourself. First, I shall play my original research on the Sphinx enclosure, who discovered it, the explanations they gave at the time, and after this previous research has been shown to you, I will explain what I find to not only be deliberately ignorant and complacent by one of the most highly regarded supposed fringe researchers of them all. Any public acceptance and acclamations should always be perceived as suspicious, simply due to the controversy of our role within challenging status quo. They should instead be looked upon as an indication that said individual is most likely compromised, this is due to their rarely being public popularizing of individuals in our field of study, and any that do are generally perceived by the powers that be as paid-off shills. Thus, the reality of the site's age is naturally far too controversial a question to ask. Anyone, alive or now dead, who claimed to be within the same field of study and discovery as me and many others, who receive such warm receptions by those they in essence should be a risk to, have outed themselves as nothing more than funded individuals, placed in particular positions of influence on specific platforms, to try to lead a charge which unfortunately forms a tail-chasing orbit, one which unless said follower recognizes these funded individuals' tactics will never escape from, slowly extinguishing any healthy inquisitive manner as mentioned in the previous video. The severe undulating erosion upon the walls of the Sphinx enclosure undoubtedly show that the Sphinx had been heavily weathered, long before the Sahara became a desert. Therefore, one must suspect that it could indeed be over 9,000 years old. Not knowing exactly how much rainfall there's been in the distant past, the Sphinx could indeed be far older than this. The most notable scholarly advocates, Robert Scotch argues that the Sphinx may be far older than 12,000 years. Robert Baval and Graham Hancock proposed that the Sphinx may have been built around 10,500 BC during the last age of Leo. Anthony West believes everything on the Giza Plateau testifies to an advanced, secure and long-settled civilization. Therefore, he suggests that the Sphinx may have been built not during the age of Leo, but the whole processional cycle earlier. In around 36,000 BC, a date he feels is more in keeping with the history of Egypt as chronicled by certain Egypt kings. Regardless of an exact date, all of these talented Egyptologists propose a date set much further back within history than currently accepted and they have provided considerable evidence to back up such conclusions. At the time of disclosure, the argument sent shockwaves through the Egyptologist establishment. Not because of the datings, Egyptologists and mainstream historians have grown quite inept at ignoring data, but more because it was realized that there is indeed no other explanation for their arguments. There is little doubt that the Sphinx enclosure was subject to severe erosion within its lifetime, and although it could have been explained away as a naturally formed enclosure, we fortunately know from analysis that the limestone blocks dug out from there were then used within the building of nearby Sphinx temple. Interestingly, no other site in Egypt shows the same type or degree of erosion. Was the evidence hidden away? Concealed from the public in what could only be called a conspiracy. Sediments surrounding the base of the monuments under once existing watermark upon the stones halfway up the great pyramid sides indicate just that. Two-inch thick salt incrustations once found within inner chambers, silt sediments rising to 14 feet around the bases of the pyramids, found to contain seashells and fossils that have been radiocarbon dated at nearly 12,000 years old, have indeed slowly vanished over the years. These sediments could only have been deposited in such great quantities by major sea flooding. A watermark was also once clearly visible on the limestone casing stones of the great pyramid. These stones were unfortunately unknowingly removed by invading Arabs. These watermarks were halfway up the sides of the pyramid, or about 400 feet above the present level of the Nile River, 200 feet above the base. It seems the last remaining shred of evidence, the enclosure, survived due to the talented individuals that were required to spot it, individuals who are thankfully on our side. Egypt craves the mountains of money the structures generate, but also redistribute a small slice of such into stopping people from pondering for too long in regards to their age, astonishing construction, or indeed, original purpose. The reason for the channel's creator reluctantly coming to this conclusion is that most of the content created by the individuals is done for the sole purpose of distracting said viewer, and making their job of distinguishing that which is fact from that which is looser fiction, for example, the water erosion patterns do indeed exist, and were first discovered by R.A. Schwaller-Delubic, a French mystic and alternative Egyptologist with first claimed evidence of water erosion on the walls of the Sphinx enclosure made by him in the 1950s. John Anthony West, however, not surprisingly plagiarized Schwaller's work, jumping on his discovery and over a number of years building it up as not only having a fictional origin, but also age and reason for existence, and also a widely spread conspiracy to try to quash people's suspicions of a greater age without encouraging them to pursue such watermarks further or indeed any other possible reason for existing. All these individuals are funded deceivers, conceived due to an uncontrollable rise in people that had begun approaching the obvious facts that no matter how astonishing the artifacts, the gold death masks or jewels found drenching Egypt's museums, people began to perceive truth and understanding as a far more precious thing to observe and learn from. The fact is that the Sphinx was originally surrounded by water, the enclosure merely forming its banks. However, this is probably one of the most important discoveries I have ever made by searching archives and manuscript. Most highly qualified Egyptologists know that the enclosure was built to contain a lake called the Lake of Anubis, a dog not a cat. Furthermore, before the Spanish invasion, a waterline could be seen nearly halfway up the Great Pyramid, and as my previous video explained also within the Great Pyramid, a layer of sea salt nearly 2 inches thick in some places was reported, although none remains to this day as it was taken away discreetly to cover up the reality and true age of the site, that there was indeed a great flood. And third and finally, the phases of casing stones which are clear attempts to conserve the monument from further erosion can be identified as the work of at least three separate lost civilizations. This strongly suggests that throughout our existence we have been susceptible to near extinction on several occasions. Why did the Egyptian authorities cover up what was found behind Gatenbing's door? Why was there a waterline that could be seen halfway up the pyramids themselves? And why did they dispose of proof of sea flooding without telling the world? We find the entire series of events highly compelling.