What is one simple, simple fix that could change Lamar's game and help take it to another level? Do you think that Greg Roman finally gets to picture and will really mix up the offense this upcoming season? Shirayvins keep Matt Judon or Yonikin Gakue? These and many, many more questions on this episode of NFL Questions from subscribers. YouTube team keep it clean. What's going on? It's Engraven here with another video and another episode of NFL Questions from subscribers. What this is is a series where you can ask me any NFL question you want to based off of any NFL team and we answer in the video just like this. Now if you want to be part of NFL Questions from subscribers then you can send me an email at teamkeepitclean at gmail.com. Don't send it to any other emails or else your question will not be a part of Questions from subscribers. I love y'all team keep it clean. Shout out to all the patrons. If you want to become a patron you can go to patreon.com slash Engraven Viz is in the description. If you ever want to send anything to us the team keep it clean. The PO box is down below in the description. Twitter, everything, merch, mask, everything is down below in the description. I got a lot of stuff down there so y'all make sure y'all check it out. Well team keep it clean. I love y'all. I appreciate y'all. Let's keep this thing going and let's get into these questions. First question came from my boy Fernando. He said I'm just going to keep this short. We need a wide receiver with size and speed bad. What do you think we should draft? Well who do you think we should draft? I really don't think they should draft a receiver. I don't. I would not be convinced in the Ravens' developmental ability for them to draft a wide receiver. Now Hollywood he's been coming along fine but there's still a lot of questions about Boykin and from what we saw last year with Duvenay and Proche there's still a lot of questions and really what we've seen over the course of the Ravens history is still a lot of questions for them at wide receiver. A lot more questions than answers so I would rather them sign a free agent that was already developed already knew his stuff and already just has has panned out because I think that would be a much better route for them. And he said so I think we should trade up in the second round for Cadarius Tony. This man is special and what we need also love the V is appreciated. I've heard his name a lot and I got to do my own research about him too. I've heard Wato have heard Terrence Marshall so I got to start looking at guys now too but I just I would much rather Ravens just sign a free agent. Next question came from my boy Anthony L. He said what's up hope all is well with you and the fam. How do you feel about the Ravens signing Deon Kane? Didn't really watch a lot of highlights of him but do you think he can be a good number one and depending on cap space do you think Ravens can still land a proven number one for example Alan Robinson. So no I don't think Deon Kane is going to be that number one and he's not commanding a lot of cap room. He signed to a future deal so it's going to be super cheap. It's not going to be anything that just shakes up the cap or anything like that. So I wouldn't worry about the money with him from what I saw with him. He looks like a 5050 guy. He got good speed. He's quick. Everything about it looks good. I didn't see really any of his blocking ability but everything is a receiver. Everything looks good. He's six foot two. Like I say good speed. Real good speed. Good and open space can make people miss. But I think the biggest thing with him has just been the lack of opportunity. So but I don't think that's really going to change with the Ravens because the Ravens are not this team that's just feeding all these different receivers so much. It's not going to be like oh somebody that we signed to a future reserve contract. I mean a future contract is not like they're going to oh they're going to step on a scene they're going to shine and they're going to take over. It'd be nice to see them get some time but I just I don't see it happening just to be realistic. So I don't think this has any hindrance on the Ravens free agent options at the wide receiver position. And with Allen Robinson I don't I don't think they're going to get him. I never thought they were going to get him. I would love if they did get him but I don't see them getting him. Next question came from a boy Justin P. He said I know I've been getting on your nerves a little bit. LOL would share my podcast and YouTube channel just trying to get to where you at and your major inspiration to myself and many others. Anyway on to the Ravens. That ain't nothing man. And keep doing your thing man. Keep pushing keep going man. Keep going. And then my biggest advice to anybody trying to do the YouTube channel podcast any of that stuff do it your way and be patient. Do it your way and be patient. Because we talked about this more extensively on the podcast but there's going to be a lot of people that do like your style. There's going to be a lot of people that don't like your style. But as long as you like your style and you having fun with what you're doing then all that's going to come. The growth is going to come the support is going to come and just all that stuff is going to come but you got to just keep doing your thing be consistent and be patient. So no I ain't got no problem with you continuing to share it with me man. So keep on doing it man. What he said. As I said in my previous podcast episode he did a little plug there and YouTube episodes did another plug there. He said Greg Roman has to go point blank period. He is stunting Lamar's growth with his 1960s three yards and a cloud of dust scheme. Lamar is a pocket passer who so happened to be born and blessed with extreme athletic ability and speed. All that is God given. You can't coach that either. You have it or you don't. He can play in a pro style offense. He did in Louisville when he won the Heisman. So you have a Heisman trophy winner and league MVP a QB and you want to keep the training wheels on. It's ridiculous. You saw when he gets to play freely. He puts up monster numbers. Look at all those five touchdown games from the 2019 season. Those weren't flukes. I say all this to say let Lamar play the QB position the right way. And yes I do agree with that. And my thing with that is that I feel like with Lamar Jackson Greg Roman in the offense that it's going to be a nice thing when they stop relying on him so much and they can that's when they can really open it up when they stop relying on his legs so much because what they do and I mean not to say you you do want to use your weapons on your team but Lamar is the weapon. He is the weapon and there's a lot of plays. There's some plays that just they get so obvious and what not and we call them out all the time. Y'all call them out all the time. But there's that that keep where Lamar rolls out but keeps it and tries to scramble for a first and oh that player is so cringy. I hate when he was seeing that. Oh it's so annoying and they do it so much and so frequently and it's like oh boy. And then there's of course all the third and twos. You know when it's third and two Lamar is doing they're going to do the RPO Lamar is going to keep and try to get them yards. But you just it's more about balance that's the biggest thing because we know Lamar going to get his he's going to get his through the air get his on the ground but it's about balance. If you can have better balance that can go such a long way and really open things up for your quarterback because he is your quarterback. You drafted him in the first round for a reason and you drafted him at the quarterback position for a reason. He plays quarterback for you so let him do that. You saw what he did in college and like you mentioned you saw what he did in those games throwing four or five touchdowns. He can do that but you got to open this thing up and some people may say oh well Lamar maybe he struggles with that in practice that's why they're not doing it in the real games. Okay get him through the struggles get him through if somebody's struggling with something and you just be like oh you know what since you struggle with that we're not going to do it we're not going to work on it forget about it. No keep doing it keep doing it. That repetition is it's going to it's going to build their confidence up and it's going to build just there it's going to build whatever skill that is up to whatever they need to work on it's going to build that up because they're doing it over and over and over again and so they're getting a better feel for it they're getting used to it they can acclimate it to it so all the same stuff needs to be done with Lamar Jackson. Yep I don't have to mess around let me be an offensive coach for the Ravens man we're going to have that boy right. Next question came from my boy Darryl W he said what's going on in graven hope you and the fam are safe and in good health I've seen a lot of videos analyzing different aspects of Lamar Jackson's game they talk about his arm angle his difficulty with throwing passes outside the numbers his lack of a true number one receiver etc but the one thing I have never heard anyone talk about and I believe would help his game too tremendously improve is to simply learn to take snaps on the center oh yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes you even got to say nothing else after that yes I agree so much with this so much anyway he said this move would have an immediate impact on how defenses play Lamar number one it lessens the likelihood of bad snaps yes and and us as Ravens fans we know all about that from last year but anyway moving on he said especially in games in bad weather like in new england number two it keeps the defense on their toes because they don't know if he is taking a one three five or seven step drop y'all saw I was messing up with my count on my hand I was trying to read and count at the same time anyway but that's true as well just standing back in the pistol even a half decent defensive end can pin their ears back and get them to have to move around number three it would add a new wrinkle to the rpo Lamar running in a direction for a handoff will make the entire defense shift this could help with naked boots play action with crossing routes in the overall run game yes yes I don't have anything will need to add anything to that that was that was perfect oh boy the title of this question is called what if did y'all hear that what if my guy it came from a boy Rodel he said my guy is clear that the Texans are in rebuild mode it's clear we only build on defense it's a matter of time before the Texans trade Watson once he departs I feel like JJ Y is next with us just signing coach Anthony Weaver do you think we make a move at JJ Y not that I want him or we need him but it just feels like the Ravens thing to do you know what you know ignore offensive knees and get defensive once so yeah I could see it happening I could definitely see it happening and I feel the same way it's not a move that I would want but it wouldn't hurt but it just the money I just I could definitely see but especially with them possibly losing Panamik Fee with them Jude on Yannick and Gakwe Tyus Bowser not saying they'll lose all four but they're definitely going to lose at least two of them at least two and probably three but bringing in a JJ Y is a very Raven-esque move so I could definitely see it happening I mean he you know he wants out of Houston the Sean Watson getting ready to be out of Houston so the Texans fans will have already they're already prepping for the blow they know it's coming Texans the brass knows it's coming Texans ownership they are they all know everybody knows it's coming so it's not like it's gonna shock anybody when it does actually happen but is but him going to the Ravens would be very yes Raven-esque um but I just hope if it does happen I just oh boy I just hope the money is right and it ain't nothing crazy and they ain't trying to like because JJ Y is not the same JJ Y they gotta remember that but we'll just see what happens next question came from my boy Sean Ivy he said what's up in gravy and hope all is well with you and your fam been a while since I chimed in but believe me I'm always watching appreciate you man he said now begins a time of great speculation known as the NFL offseason oh yeah it's a lot of fun too all the mock draft analysts and Mr. Know-it-alls with voice uh they they will voice their opinions and contradict themselves about what moves the Ravens will make and which direction they think the Ravens will go I enjoy the madness and listening to the gossip but I keep it a thousand and I think realistically although the popular first round pick would be that Phantom number one wide receiver those who really know know is going to be either O-line or pass rush I believe the wide receiver position will be addressed and I'm confident we will find a fit even if the player is on the team already I wanted Roman to be fired but I think he finally gets the picture I believe if we pass the ball eight to ten percent more and mix it up well while still dominating with the run but show effectively we can pass opponents we'll be guessing uh at the point while we win more and more I like that and I love how he put that he said pass the ball eight to ten percent more so he's saying he's not saying to revamp everything to absolutely change everything just add in a significant significant more of a significant amount of passing uh into the Ravens offense and he said mix it up well yes mix it up well exactly and then he also said while still dominating with the run but show effectively that we can pass yes I love it especially since Greg Roman is still here but anyway he said uh opponents will be guessing at the point while we win more and more especially when it counts in the playoffs my question to you is do you believe that dog is on the team already and just waiting to be fired or is he elsewhere waiting for us to pounce also okay so we'll do question by question so is that dog already on the team you know who got some dog in on his team Hollywood does Hollywood does he got the mouth he'll talk he'll talk he'll taunt one thing with Hollywood though we need that playoff Hollywood in regular season that playoff Hollywood man he he just he gave that much more effort man he's in playoff time Hollywood steps it up against the Titans against the Beals against the Titans last year Hollywood steps it up so I really feel like Hollywood got that in him he obviously ain't got the size he ain't no six foot five wide receive anything like that but he got that help but the one thing that I would really love to see from Hollywood during a regular season take that contact take that contact and and I know he ain't gonna be running nobody over but he did he did get that little step for him I forgot who he gave that step for him too but he gave somebody that step for him I remember that game I don't remember who it was against but I remember to play but take that contact and try to get them extra yards because that could make a big difference because you and you just never know you may slip through a defender's arms and take off but besides Hollywood DuVernay too DuVernay is the physical he's physical and DuVernay don't shy away from contact DuVernay could be something serious man but he would just have to get the shot to get the chance I just tried to say shot and chance at the same time I said shot but anyway he would have to get that if he could get that oh man but he would have to get that opportunity consistently Boykin Boykin got the physical tools but I feel like up here up here is where things have been slipping a bit but with Boykin I think it's all about that opportunity man and I think that's one of the biggest things with Raven when it comes to Ravens in their wire receivers is opportunity opportunity because there's that lack of opportunity man so with that being said I just um I feel like the person they could already be there but it's about how Ravens used him how Ravens implement them in their offense so anyway and he said do you believe that Giro gets the picture and will finally mix it up more despite what he did in the past based off of history I'm not the most confident person in the world and the offense coming up at least at least the passing offense I know the Russian offense is going to be just fine they're going to be good probably going to be great but as far as the passing offense I do think Giro knows but I think hardball knows too like hey hey buddy it's it's time it's time NFL is the what have you done for me lately leak it stands for not for long so I don't think that Greg Roman is going to be uh giving this pass over and over and over again I think it's now or never like early on too so we'll see what happens with that um and then he said or will his stubborn style be his demise oof that's a big yikes uh thanks again fam love watching the growth of the channel uh you keep building your network big things in your future peace from showing from east b-ball hey appreciate you man and thank you for supporting always bringing like I love with his questions and even his comments on the videos too he always brings that perspective and it's like oh okay I see you next question came from my boy Ryan K he said bro after the emotions have subsided I feel good about where our team is actually Harb's recent presser helped me to see things from a more optimistic and objective lens sometimes we get worked up because our expectations have been disappointed not necessarily because the situation is really that bad example Greg Roman situation we are a couple of years away from making the big dance sometimes building on what you have is better than blowing things up that's a lesson for life that is true that is a lesson for life but I still think that they should have went in a different direction um so I I respectfully disagree with that about uh blowing up the offense hey hopefully I end up being wrong hopefully this thing ends up working itself out and this offense can take off continue running really good and then end up passing well as well um but I just under Greg Roman the and I know history history is meant to be broken records are meant to be broken but Greg Romans history as an offensive coordinator we know who he is we know what he's done and hopefully I'm wrong but we we know what he will do we've seen it year in year out the cap Tyrod Lamar we've seen it oh Alex Smith was in there a little bit too but we've seen it so I just my expectations they've they've lowered a bit hopefully doing the offseason I just don't know but I just don't know and that's not me being negative that's just me being realistic about who our offensive coordinator is I'm hoping for hoping to be wrong I'm hoping for the best man I'm not walking around like oh man these ravens they suck they this I'm no ain't unlike that but my expectations they just they took a hit once they confirmed like like he was staying on like oh okay okay so we'll see what they do this season and I mean we won't really know till we know we won't know till we won't know in preseason we won't know anything in preseason we'll hear of course all the reporters and all that and all the analysts of oh Greg Roman he's installing this this this in the offense wow this passing offense is gonna look they look great that's gonna be all that preseason talk all that no all that training camp talk that's what it's gonna be oh man this passing game is gonna be crazy you know how it goes every single year but we won't know anything until weeks one through one once the one through five because after one week you can't see it after two weeks you can't see it even after three you start to start to see a little bit something but you gotta see that consistency you gotta see that consistency and then it all depends on the opponents too but you you really want to see that consistency so I say after week five then we'll really really know what we're in store for but it is what it is next question came from a boy Isaiah as he said engraving I just got the news that rg3 got released what are your thoughts on how he played with the ravens while for the time that he was on the roster was he good or bad I hope your family is doing well and stay safe appreciate that Isaiah I'm sorry he did all right but he did what he was expected to do he wasn't expected to come in here and be this amazing quarterback anything like that he would he came in here to be a transitional piece while the ravens inserted their new qb of the future because when they sign an rg3 that's when and they tried to sign rg3 a couple years before but he was like no I'm not ready but then when they sign an rg3 that was meant to be the transitional piece from the for the ravens to go from Joe Fleco to whoever would be next and that ended up being Lamar Jackson so rg3 was brought in not to be this amazing player but to be an amazing mentor to be an amazing teammate and just in case anything happened to come in and fill in and try to pick up where Lamar left off at so while his play when he was on the field it wasn't the best wasn't the flashiest he did all right and he did everything that he was supposed to do as a teammate next question came from a boy Logan he said how come the ravens always lose in the playoffs to a quarterback of the number 17 this almost seems scripted that is very very very very funny I love that question and because I okay josh allen yeah he's number 17 but then uh last year we lost to tana hill he's number 17 then the previous year we lost to um uh philip rivers he was number 17 so that's funny I like that question but I know under the flacco years they lost to other quarterbacks whose number weren't 17 but so I guess if you were to your question why under Lamar Jackson uh in the playoffs do we always lose to a quarterback whose number 17 but also the only playoff game that we've won while Lamar Jackson has been a starter in the playoffs has been to a number 17 next question came from tanya she said that ain't great but how you know fam doing are we doing good really good appreciate it I was looking at the peace kurt want to put out with hollywood and mark ending up right next to each other in the end zone lamar has showed frustration with receivers for being in the wrong place and running the wrong routes this is a big problem imagine how many times this happens because I have seen Lamar hesitate and it could be because receivers are not on the same page that is another major problem Lamar has to deal with he is really left out there to get things done on his own coaching has to be held accountable shaking my head what are your thoughts yeah that's got to be uh very frustrating um as a quarterback when if your receivers are doing the wrong thing because you you spend so much time throughout the week practicing repetition over and over and over and then if in the in the game your receivers they they run in all these routes and one receiver supposed to be emptying out this space so this receiver can be there but both receivers end up in the same but they both end up in the same place it's got to be super frustrated so um I could understand why that why that would make Lamar hesitant and then if there's a breakdown with the offensive line on top of that and it just it's a perfect storm and it's a it's a it's a recipe for disaster so again Lamar still he got he's still got some issues too but when that happens I'm sure that's got to just drive him insane and we've seen plenty of times when he's shown that frustration which I ain't got no problem with man I ain't got no problem with anybody showing frustration when they upset on the field or anybody showing the happiness when they they having success on the field uh emotion is part of the game but I we have seen it be just very uh heated at times when stuff like that happens and and he'll he'll tell them too you'll see him do some like a little hand moving or something like that or he'll go like that so he'll show them like oh you should have been here blah blah blah but yeah hopefully that can be fixed uh this off season how oh it's a long list of ways next question came from a boy ace he said do you think Lamar has to move on from Joshua Harris and that's his uh qb coach been his qb coach for a long time now um no I wouldn't say that because if especially if he's been uh coaching Lamar since his college days uh and Lamar obviously had a lot of success there and he's had a lot of success in the NFL too but I think that the the coach that they should move on from uh they already determined that he's staying with the Ravens this season so Lamar kind of stuck with him but anyway his next question he said did you see the interview with Steve's been seeing about how the Ravens route concepts are elementary we'd love to know your thoughts on that uh yeah yeah we definitely saw it and I mean it is what it is but that that kind of uh brings to light why uh Greg Roman's passing offense is always bottom of the league because of those routes and I feel like there's a lot and we talked about this so much through the season but I feel like there's so much like simple stuff you can do to just open up the offense but they haven't done it and I can't can't like I'm not going into the season expecting just this huge turnaround I would love that but I just I can't expect it so it is what it is next question came from Ebony she said I ain't graven out at the Raven season is over who stays and who walks um I think there's walks I would actually like for him to stay but I think he walks I think Willie Snead he walks and I'm just going based off of pending free agents and anybody that I could see getting cut um Tyus Bowser met Judon Yoneke and Gakwe Pranel McPhee I think Judon walks um I think Bowser I think they try with Bowser I think they really try with Bowser but I could see him walking Yoneke and Gakwe um I think he walks but I think he walks because I think the timing is just really really bad because not that they it would be impossible for them to sign him but he would command big money and he just uh the Ravens only gonna have like 10 to 15 minutes we'll see we don't know the exact numbers because the exact cap hasn't come out yet but I think he walks Pranel McPhee I think he walks as well um now if I had to choose one of those four of the the defensive end pass right outside linebackers to stay uh I think it would be Bowser but I think it's gonna be hard though man because Bowser he's gonna be able to get more money on the open market um but if they if Ravens had to choose one I also think he would be Bowser um so I think he's the most likely to stay but I also think he could he could walk too Derek Wolf I think he stays um who are Chris Moore I think he he walks he's going um any other pending free agents oh DJ Fluker I think Fluker I think he walks as well so I think that uh oh Jelly Justin Ellis I think that um I think he walks too I think he walks as well so yeah oh and Massacre Massacre I think he walks um Gus Edwards I think he stays Patrick McCurry stays and ah yeah that's about it next question came from BB said bro I'm so disappointed in the Ravens release in Geno Stone again to be dropped twice in a season it has to be difficult no camp due to C-19 the Ravens are in need of a true free safety as we have discussed before to let Geno go is a big mistake he had no time to develop on the wink hopefully the Ravens take a safety either in the first or second round this upcoming draft thanks again for team keep it clean yes I um with Geno Stone I never got a chance to look at like Finn on him heard a lot of good things about him um but I do agree about the Ravens needing that that true free safety now they got by with the Sean Elliott and Chuck Cloughty did that thing but I feel like that secondary could be even better if they had that range free safety and if they could move the Sean Elliott to that strong safety role um so we'll see what happens I don't envision them doing that I do envision them taking a safety for some depth but hmm we will see we will see because the Sean Elliott his contract is coming up yeah I think this the last year of his contract because he was a what a fifth or sixth round pick I forget um out of Texas but his first year in reserve second year in reserve third year shout out to him because he played the whole year played this whole year didn't get hurt so I'm happy for him but now he's on his fourth year only first round picks get that fifth year option this is the final year for the Sean Elliott man this is the final year of his contract so it's time it's time this year is going to determine whether he stays or whether he goes and if he goes or if he stays this year will determine how much money he gets and the last question on this episode of NFL question from subscribers came from new era he said that we're still in the playoffs well this was obviously before we because right now we're out of the playoffs but he said this is more of an off-season question but I wanted to know who you think the Raven should keep between Judon or in Gakwe in my opinion Judon has played better ever since in Gakwe was traded to the Ravens true but in Gakwe has shown he can be better than Judon when he was playing with the Vikings and Jaguars after the game Judon had versus Titans this decision for me is just getting harder he started the season slow but he's gotten better also less penalties yes yes yes yes yes yes Judon he improved a lot and that's something that I often forget about because the beginning of the season he started off a bit slow but that second half of the season he played a lot better but also got to remember that that second half of the season Yanik and Gakwe was right there too so I'm sure that helped out Judon a lot because people are probably commanding more attention to Yanik and Gakwe and Judon got a little bit less attention so that allowed him to thrive so that that's a good thing Judon I think Judon is the more valuable player I really do because with Matt Judon he's not just a pass rusher he's somebody that you can move around and do different things with you could have him drop back you could have him cover tight end or something like that you could have him pass rush you can have him do all that stuff but with Yanik and Gakwe he's a pass rusher that's it he's a good pass rusher but he's a pass rusher that's it now with Yanik and Gakwe I did read that and John Hubbell talked about it at the press that he only played 20 snaps against the Beals in the playoff game 20 snaps this is the guy that you acquired via third round picking some change and 20 snaps in the playoffs when your pass rush wasn't anything serious against a team that never runs the ball and in that playoff game they never ran a ball they didn't run that's concerning but that also lets you know how they felt about Yanik and Gakwe in that situation so this is why I could see a scenario with both of them and like I said earlier I could see a scenario where both of them end up walking to where it ends up being either Yanik and Gakwe or Matt Judon even though I know the Ravens they gave up to get Yanik and Gakwe but I could see them being like uh you know what it didn't work out it didn't work out like we intended it to because you would think that normally I would think that okay yeah they traded for this guy this gonna be the guy that gets the deal it's gonna be him and this season wasn't a bad season for him the numbers weren't sexy anything like that the pass rush was nice but he would he would just get all so close to finishing but just not finish but um it could be a situation where it's neither I think they would be leaning more to and Gakwe because of what they gave up to get him but I wouldn't be surprised if both of them ended up walking I think Judon definitely walks but I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being both


Hello there, this is Bhaveya Kaushal and here are 4 news that rocked the tech world this week. Reports suggest that the new government is planning to restructure the tax distribution for tech giants. According to the new system, taxes will be redistributed according to the areas where the company has more number of users. Apple has done some serious adjustments in its App Store guidelines. Notable ones include a new update that will prohibit apps from facilitating the purchase of ammunitions. Tesla cars will now have a video game to keep you entertained while driving. Elon Musk recently revealed in an interview that he is working to bring the popular shooter video game Cuphead to Model X, Model S and Model 3 Tesla cars. Indian IT giants are taking steps to ensure that Huawei's chaos doesn't affect the Indian context. If reports are to be believed, Infosys is reviewing its contract with the Chinese telecom major and many other companies are to follow the same lead.


Okay, so this is a good one. This is like pv equals nRT. Anyways, a sample of nitrogen gas stored in a 4 liter container at 32 degrees Celsius exerts a pressure of 5.0 atm. Calculate the number of moles of nitrogen. Okay, so we've got a volume. Temperature is 32 degrees Celsius, but we want to convert that to Kelvin, right? So we're going to add that to 273. So it's going to equal 305. Thank you. 305 Kelvin. And it exerts a pressure of 5.0 atm. Calculate the number of moles. So n. And we know r, 0.21, I'm sorry, atm liter. You can figure that out eventually anyway. Okay, so we use the equation pv equals nRT. Okay, and we're looking for n. So we've got to divide both sides by RT. RT cancels that. We've got n equals pv over RT. And now we just plug everything in. So p5.0 atm times v over r is equal to 0.821 atm times liter over 1 mole Kelvin. And you multiply that by 305. Okay, so now we're going to just have to multiply and divide. So you see here, atm cancels with that atm, right? Liter cancels with that one. And then 1 over something. So it's over over. It's going to be the inverse. So the Kelvin will cancel there. You can also think of it like this is its own problem, right? So where Kelvin is going to cancel. Okay, so now we've got mole over over again. Right? So this is going to be moles out here. So now all we have to do is multiply this out. So 5 times 4 divided by 0.821 divided by 305. And the number of moles I got is 0 moles.


We discussed the issue of masks in school It's important to make clear that it's a minority a minority of people who are opposed to masks in schools But this minority is vocal in some cases threatening aggressive even violent. Oh, okay. Here we go I've told you guys about this before but the left-wing Democrat state media Loves to employ this tactic where they try to make things that are completely normal seem like they're outside the bounds of normalcy And another tactic is a play here where they want their viewers They want left-wingers and other Democrats to think that the only legitimate protest is one that is pushing a left-wing agenda Or a Democrat party agenda and you can say the same thing about elections They think the only legitimate election is one that they win and you've got to just love the complete lack of consistent standards here We're talking about very peaceful parents who might get vocal sometimes about not wanting their kids to be in masks Eight hours a day seven days a week and let's not forget that beyond calling these clearly violent protests mostly peaceful They also went out of their way to defend violent rioters who threw bottles and rocks at their own reporters video shared on Twitter of Water bottle being thrown at your crew on one occasion. This seems like it was protesters trying to trying to create trouble This was a story that went viral in right-wing media Frankly they claim CNN was covering it up, which is ridiculous But we even moved because some protesters didn't want to be on camera So we moved to accommodate them and another smaller group of protesters came around and Started sort of shouting us down. They had a loudspeaker. They're trying to shout us down They wanted us they wanted us to move to a place where we couldn't see the protesters that were taunting the police And that's when this water bottle gets thrown at one of our guys didn't want to look like we were Running that's when somebody hit me with a water bottle and then we sort of just started moving toward our cars They continued to sort of pelt us with whatever they could find You know a lot of people are very angry suspicious of the press the corporate media. It was intense There were people who were angry at everything and everybody and we happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time I'm gonna cover more of this completely insane segment But first take just a moment to hear about this special offer from prepare with drone tech calm these days The future is still more uncertain than ever. That's why people who know what's coming are using today to prepare You can't wait until the last moment by then it's too late The most important thing you need is long-term storage Emergency food it stays fresh for up to 25 years and will be there when you need it I strongly recommend my patriot supply America's leader and self-reliance. They're the only source my family uses for emergency food planning and right now You can save $50 off a four-week supply of delicious meals that provide 2000 plus calories a day calories give you the energy you need to survive and saving $50 is impossible to pass up But supplies are limited so go to www.preparewithdronetech.com right now and stock up. That's preparewithdronetech.com There's no time to lose do it now and remember we just went through years now of violent left-wing mob protest and riots that spread across this entire country while people on CNN kept insisting that it was mostly peaceful None of these parents have burned anything down Some of them have gotten into scuffles maybe a handful, but most of these people are just very vocal I don't want to get too ahead of myself on this clip, but I'm warning you right now if you have some tape You better wrap it tightly around your head because it's probably gonna explode this the majority who support masks parents And yes students some of whom are just fed up with the aggressive minority I'm sorry. Who is telling these kids or these parents that they can't wear a mask? They're free to wear a mask the problem that we're having is that schools want to force kids to wear masks Fed up with the aggressive minority. I think we're This is like mind-bending gaslighting going on here You're you are you trying to tell me right now that these black clad antifa chuds these Communist mobs that they're not an aggressive violent minority Yet they get complete cover and even promotion and protection from this guy and his Democrat Party bosses This it's just the exact same thing that they do with every Protest that isn't a Democrat or left wing led protest. They did it with the Tea Party They did it with the pro Trump protests.  Oh She flipped off these adults. She's a child But she flipped off adults for the high crime of protesting not even really protesting just standing around peacefully with signs and that Saluter there as we should say Fiona joins me now along with her finger and her mother Megan Downey Thank you both so much for being with us this morning Fiona, why don't you just walk us through what happened on the bus on the way to school that day? Okay, so the protesters are there every single day and They come over and they just hold up their signs and for me. I was just fed up and I was built with anger Okay, so what we have here is a child flipping off parents who are peaceful and are just making their voices be heard What is it that we always hear from these people that that people should go out and make their voices be heard We are constantly told how utterly American protest is and how crucial it is to democracy Oh unless you're protesting something that the state media doesn't agree with but just get ready because I know those of you Who are parents out there would never in a million years teach your child to disrespect parents much less flip off peaceful parents Who are just making their voices heard But like I said these people can rationalize anything and as long as it's against people that they disagree with well Then anything goes and I just decided to give them finger because I thought it was the best thing I could do but So so when you drive past them to get into your school, I mean, what are the signs say and how does it make you feel? Um, they say like stuff like masks aren't the cure I can't remember the rest but and by the way, what's wrong about that sign the mask is not the cure Well, there's no arguing against that the mask is most certainly not the cure And in fact there is no cure for COVID and there isn't gonna be a cure for COVID it makes me just really angry and I don't know it makes everyone else angry and We're all disannoyed with it. All right, just think about that for a second She just admitted that they're peacefully standing there with signs every day and that that just made her angry and because she's angry She's not allowed to express that anger towards the people she disagrees with But do you think for a one second that that standard applies to you and how you might respond to their protests? Of course not Megan you got a text from Fiona basically saying um, well, what did the text say? Yeah, she said mom.  Um, do you think they saw the message you delivered?  So I'm I'm proud of my daughter and I'm fine with that No, I'm just smiling because it's one of those challenging parenting moments Okay, I'm starting to see what's going on here This mother thinks that she's got the next grid of Thunberg because her child flipped off an adult Who was peacefully standing with a son? So then the question you have to ask is why this child's so angry when she sees signs that state something that she Doesn't agree with and does she think that it's perfectly acceptable if she's protesting if other people get very upset and Come back at her just as aggressively well then this standard should just apply to all of us if we see a protest We don't like well. We could just go over there and start flipping them off She seems to have it in her head that these people don't have a right to do what they're doing when they do and I just wonder What kind of crazy justifications mental gymnastics these people are doing honestly? I understood her frustration and her anger It's been 18 months of this pandemic, which has been hard on all of us in different ways But especially I think on adolescence and but the other side could say the exact same thing They feel like their kids have gone through a lot having to wear masks all day every day And apparently it didn't make any difference because they're having to do it again But none of that matters those kids those parents they don't matter their concerns aren't legitimate only their concerns because they're on CNN That's not something you're supposed to do but sort of your whispering to yourself right on you know It's sort of you gotta be careful with that. Where does this go from here? Do you think in the coming days? Are these people gonna be outside your your informant? I should know I mean they can't be out there all winter It's gonna get cold and I ask again What kind of a parent teaches their child that is okay to disrespect other parents? I don't claim to be the best father ever, but I would never even consider teaching my child such a lesson I have no idea. I hope that the school can do something about it I mean they're right outside of school property. No, that's not school property. That's public property And so no, there's nothing that you can do or the school can do you can't have these people arrested For the high crime of protesting something that you happen to agree with and I just want to reiterate how Disturbing it is that CNN and this mother are teaching this child this lesson That there's something wrong if people are protesting something that you disagree with or something that you agree with that It's perfectly acceptable to disrespect them in their faces. Well, no doubt if the same people did the exact same thing back to her They're gonna have a problem with it I just want to throw something else out there now that she's allowed her daughter and CNN has brought her daughter into the National public debate. How are they gonna react when people come back towards her very negatively? Well, I think that that's really the entire purpose of all this at least as far as CNN goes I think her mother probably thinks she's the next Greta Thunberg or something But CNN wants to put her out there because they know now that people are gonna tweet her or email her or maybe Protesters at the school will protest her specifically and then they're gonna act all Outraged about that and use it to demonize these people even more you spread a message And I think they saw it and I think a lot of people are seeing it And I understand your frustration because it is a minority this vocal aggressive minority who are protesting masks And and sometimes you have to deliver a certain message back It's just amazing how the language and the tone completely changes when they're talking about a minority Which they see as likely white people and conservative or Christian or Republican either way This is a minority they can all rally around hating and I'd like to see his proof that it's a minority of parents That don't want their kids in masks eight hours a day seven days a week And even if it was just a minority of students, what's his point there? Like you're right to protest suddenly goes away if the majority doesn't agree with you if that's the case then the vast majority of left-wing Democrat Party protests are a small minority of very vocal people who lucky for them have the backing of major state media Complex is like CNN and MSNBC. All right folks That's about all of that that I could take for one day But as always I thank you for watching if you enjoyed it Please hit that like button and let me know what you think in the comment section


What is going on everybody? It's Stas here. Welcome back to another video. So in this video, we're going to be doing an overall market update. Looking at the Dow Jones, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, we're going to be talking about one trade that I made today on the 11th of March in 2019, as well as taking a look at some other stocks and ETFs that did very well today. And trust me guys, there were a bunch of stocks today that did very well. And we're also going to be looking at some that I potentially want to trade here over these next couple of days. But before we do get into the topic of today's video, for everybody out there that finds value in these videos, you enjoy the content here on YouTube, feel free to go down below and hit that like button. Guys, it really does support the channel and supports me in general. And if you're new to the community, you're new to my channel here, feel free to go down below if you want to stay further connected with our community. Two links are down below, the free Discord group chat as well as the free Facebook group. You'll find a ton, a ton, a ton of value in there if you want to learn more about trading, stocks, investing and just want to be a part of a very helpful integrated community. Again, all of those links are down below in the description box. So like I said guys, a bunch of stocks did very well today. And you can tell here by the SPX, the SPX, the Dow and the NASDAQ, they did absolutely amazing today, right? The SPX was up about 1.47% at the close, up about $40 on the day. The Dow Jones today, guys, up about 200 points, up about 0.8% on the day. And the NASDAQ did the best out of them all today, guys. We can see it's up around $4 here, up about 0.06%. But this is for after hours because these are the futures. But if we take a look here, you know, on the one day, one minute, we can see the move that we made today, guys, from about 70, 75, all the way up to, let's see, where did we close at? I believe it was at around, what was it, like, 70, 90? We can see a move of about 1.5, 1.6, 1.7% in the NASDAQ, up about, let's say, 100, let's see, about 110, 120 points in terms of the NASDAQ from the open to the close of the market. And this was heavily due to a bunch of tech stocks, including Apple and Facebook, that we called out and talked about in yesterday's video, doing very well, as well as Amazon, Netflix, Google, Microsoft, all of them had a fantastic day in the NASDAQ is obviously a very tech heavy index. And we're going to be diving into those charts in terms of these tech stocks in a couple of minutes here. So stay tuned here. And let's start off this video, like we always do, guys, talking about the SPX, the S&P 500, the 500 largest publicly traded US company. So for all you guys have been following the channel for a while now, you know that we've been identifying multiple indications that are indicators, rather, that the SPX in the entire market was selling off, right? We called out the double top, we called out the break below the channel here on the 30 day 90 minute chart, we called out the break below the 50 SMA, the EMA, and then the 180 SMA a couple of days ago. But today, guys, we actually got a very clear bounce here on the 180 SMA on this 30 day 90 minute chart after we dip below it a little bit on the previous trading day. And we can clearly see, you know, we're popping up here, we're breaking above the 50 SMA, we broke above the EMA line, everything is pointing to an uptrend reversal now that we're really just continuing that uptrend that we've been on this whole 2019 here that we can clearly see on this 2000 or rather this 180 four hour chart. So what did we talk about in the previous video? We were talking about what did we want to see? We wanted to see whether or not the SPX was going to break out of this resistance at about 2740. And we can clearly see guys, we had no problem of doing that. We also talked about breaking out of the 50 SMA. We had no problem in doing that as well. So at this point, we're back at that 2785, 2790 resistance that we were at a couple of weeks ago really last week and a little bit the week before where we have difficulty breaking into the 2800 level, the 2810 to 2815 level. And that is what I'm really going to be looking for for the rest of this week and heading on for the rest of this month, guys, this month guys, I had a little tongue twister there. But are we going to get back into that 2800 level? We're obviously going to be testing the 2790 level here in the next coming days. If we do end up pulling back tomorrow or the next day, you know, we might be heading towards this 50 SMA support level. If we do end up pulling back, but still I'm going to be watching that pump up to the 2790 resistance and to see whether or not we're going to break above it, hold it as a new support and continue this uptrend and ultimately break out of the 2815 resistance that we topped off. Really, we saw a double top there a couple of weeks ago. You know, we struggled to get out of there. So this is something that I'm very interested in seeing. And if we clearly quickly clear this drawing set and I draw a new trend line here for you guys, we can see, you know, this is what we're looking at in terms of the SPX here and the fact that we're holding a higher low from the previous low at about 2690, 2700, this determines that we're still uptrending, we're still pushing up and on a broad basis here on an overall, you know, 180 analysis of the SPX, we're still uptrending, we are still pushing up. But let's say tomorrow, you know, we end up selling off, let's say we get rejected by the 2790 level resistance and we start to push down, you know, that might be a different story because from there, if we start to push down over the next couple of days and then we end up breaking this level and start to test, you know, 2700, which a lot of people in the YouTube community, a lot of investors in general have been saying the 2700 flat level for the SPX is a very, very critical spot. And it really is a critical spot. You know, if that does end up happening, this could be a sign that we're selling off. And at that point, this is going to look like a head and shoulders pattern, right, the left shoulder, the head, and then the right shoulder, which is something that we called out, really not called out because it didn't quite happen yet. But we talked about that, you know, over the past couple of videos that this could be a potential pattern forming, if we do end up getting rejected here and slowly start to sell off, do you guys understand and see what I'm saying here, the left, the head, then the right, and then if we do end up pushing down here, you know, that would be a full completion of that pattern. And we could continue to sell off potentially from there in terms of the SPX, the S&P 500. So let's take a look now at the Dow Jones. You know, unlike the SPX, where we broke out of that 50 SMA resistance here on the 180, the Dow Jones is still really trending below that resistance, the 50 SMA resistance. But the good thing that we do see here is that we broke out of that other resistance that we were talking about and looking at in the previous video, which was at about $25,400. And the interesting thing with Dow Jones today, guys, was that we had a ridiculous swing. If you guys recall, this morning, I believe the futures were down nearly 200 points in terms of the Dow Jones, then we ended up swinging up 200 at the close, meaning we had a 400 point swing today in the Dow Jones. And let me explain why this happened. For those of you guys that have been paying attention to the news in general, you saw that Boeing, one of the biggest companies in the Dow 30, in the Dow Jones, actually dropped a ton today, about 12%, I believe 10, 11, 12% today. And this is because one of their 737 planes crashed. And this was actually the second plane that has crashed in a six month span. It actually ended up killing, I believe, 157 people, if I'm remembering right up the top of my head right now, about 149 passengers. And eight crew members ended up dying. It was an Ethiopian flight, I believe it was an, were they flying out of Africa into Africa, something like that? The plane ended up actually, no, I think they were flying out of Africa. The plane ended up crashing within an hour, right after takeoff or something like that. Everybody ended up dying, tragic, tragic news, really very, very tragic. And this ended up dropping Boeing stock, which in turn ended up dropping the Dow Jones heavily this morning. And the fact that we, you know, let's see if we can actually see it here, the gap down, right, we can see the gap down from 25, all the way, 25, 400, all the way down to 25, 200. And then we had that 400 point swing. So this gap down actually put us below this resistance that we're talking about here at about 25, 400.  And now we're under the 50 SMA, and we're looking to hold that old resistance that we broke out of this morning as a new support level. So that's exactly what I'm going to be, you know, end up, you know, looking for tomorrow is whether or not we're going to maintain this level as a new support, and then slowly start to fill the gap back up to the next resistance, which in this case is at about $25,900. If we test this level in the next couple of days, we end up breaking out of that level, you know, we could be testing those highs that we saw a couple of weeks back at about 26,200, which happens to be the next resistance, which is here at 26,200, where we topped off back into the beginning of November in 2018. So keep an eye on those levels, guys. But again, you know, if we clear this drawing set very quickly, we can see, you know, we're maintaining the uptrend here on the longer-term basis on the 184-hour chart. The higher low has been made from the previous low at about 25,000 flat. The low here is at about 25,200. These are very good signs that we're maintaining the uptrend. So that's what the Dow is looking like right now, guys. I want to see the breakout of there, the big, big dip in the Boeing stock really caused the Dow Jones to drop pretty heavily this morning, but we saw a very, very nice recovery here.  Again, like I said, the tech stocks today, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google, Microsoft, they all did absolutely amazing. So we talked about the potential hold, or actually I think it did end up holding this 180S in May when I recorded my last Market Update video this past Friday. We talked about this being a new potential support level. And the fact that we did end up holding this is a very good sign that we're continuing the uptrend in the NASDAQ. And we can see here today, guys, with the big, big move that we saw. We ended up breaking the resistance here at about 7,100. And now we're testing the next resistance at about 7,200. So very big moves today in the NASDAQ guys, very big move. We ended up breaking through two critical resistances, one being the 50S in May here on the 184-hour chart, the next one being the 7150 level I just talked about. And now tomorrow what I'm going to be waiting for, as you guys could probably tell, is a potential break above the $7,200 level and for it to hold that resistance as a new support to potentially push even higher and continue this uptrend push to test the next resistance, which now it's looking like we have to finally draw this one out because we're testing this resistance here, which is going to be at about $7,300 and $7,366 right around here, which we ended up topping off at in the middle of October in 2018. So very, very strong move here, guys, very strong move. Honestly, you would probably think that we're due for a pullback here due to these large, big, green candlesticks. We could potentially pull back. And if we do pull back, look for the hold on this support and a potential trend in this horizontal pattern here, maybe for a couple of days before eventually popping out. And if we do pop out, again, that's going to be the continuation of the uptrend. That is what we want to see in terms of the NASDAQ. So overall today, guys, again, very strong green day, very, very strong green day, a bunch of stocks ended up doing very well. And for those of you guys that actually watched my video that I uploaded previously today about three stocks I'm looking to swing trade, take a look at that if you have not yet watched it, maybe watch it after you watch this video, there's going to be some key insights there on what I'm personally looking to trade. So make sure you go check that out. I'm going to be talking about some other stocks in this video. I'm not really going to be mentioning those three that I talked about in that video, because I want you guys to go check that out at the shorter video. But let's talk about now what I ended up trading today. And you guys probably can tell if you guys were in the Discord group chat this morning, I talked about trading Boeing stock. Boeing stock, like I said, guys, it tanked today on that news of the Ethiopian flight crashing. Again, the second 737 flight that ended up crashing in a six-month window, very, very tragic, very, very tragic. And the stock fell from a matter of, I think it was like 425 or something, we talked about it on Sunday's video and yesterday's video as a potential entry point. But thankfully, we didn't get in. I didn't get in. I'm sure a lot of people did get in. If you did get in, you probably got burned. I am sorry. But we ended up dropping, like I said, to about, I think like 360 or something like that. And if we take a look here, on the one day minute, one day, one minute, we had a very nice fill, not a complete fill, to the top here at about 423. But we had a very nice push from 365 all the way up to about $400. And the really, honestly, guys, I got in roughly at about, I think it was like 375 this morning when I saw this big reversal pattern starting to form. And really, the first thing that I saw that really pointed to me that, okay, we could be reversing to the upside here, is this double bottom at about $370. We ended up dipping down to 365. But once we did pop up back into the 370 level, that really confirmed this double bottom here. For those of you guys that don't know, a double bottom is a reversal pattern that we like to look for, for a stock to push to the upside, just like a double top is a pattern, a reversal pattern for a stock to push to the downside, like we saw in the SPX a couple of weeks ago, or really last week. This is what you can use for, you know, a stock reverse to the upside, but we just have to view it, you know, on the double bottom basis, right? And if you mirror this image to the upside, it would be a double top, right? And we can see it would push it, right? It would push to the downside, but that's besides the point. We see this double bottom here, like I said, and this ended up pushing up. Once we started to push up out of the resistance at about 375, that is when I ended up taking a position in Boeing stock, and I ended up just riding it up 2%. Really, I know you guys that have been watching for a while, you know that I typically take about 1% to 2% profits on my day trades just to play it safe. And that's what I ended up doing today in Boeing stock, right? I got in here, ended up riding it up about 1%, 2%. Now, it was 2%, riding it up to about $385. And that was it, guys. But let's say, if I ended up holding it throughout the entire day, I could have made roughly 7% on my money, roughly about 6%, 7% if I held to the peak here. But, you know, it's all about taking a conservative approach in my personal opinion with my personal style. This way, you can be more consistent, right? Because if you try to aim for the home run trade every time, meaning you want to grab as much profit as possible, you want to be greedy, greedy, greedy, you know, you're going to get bit in the butt a lot. And this is something that I talk more in depth on in my 90% of traders fail video, right? Being too greedy will come and bite you, which is why I like to be very conservative. I like to take my profits when they're on the board at about 1%, 2% on day trades. And when I'm swing trading, it's a different story, right? When I'm looking to trade a stock, hold it for a month or two, you know, I like to grab maybe 5%, maybe 10% at some points in certain stocks that I'm swing trading. So, Boeing, guys, very, very strong move here, very strong move. And this is actually one that I'm watching tomorrow for another potential move. Maybe we do end up filling back up to about $415. And if we take a look on the 20-day one hour, we can see exactly what I'm talking about, right? This gap down from $422 down to about $365, we filled about half the way there at about $400. And let's say we end up holding $400 as a new support tomorrow, and we start to fill back up, we can move from $400 back up to about, you know, $415 for a potential 3.5% move. And this is a lesson that we can all take when looking at Boeing stock, right? When things happen like a tragedy with this plane crash, let's say an earnings report, right? A miss on earnings report, some news that comes out that's truly drastic, people overreact sometimes, right? Investors, they sell their shares, people sell, they panic. There's a lot of overreaction, which opens up a huge margin of profit, which is what we as traders look to capitalize on, right? We saw the overreaction, not saying it was an overreaction, it was a 100% tragic event, but we saw that big sell-off all the way down to $365, and you look, or really, I personally look, and a bunch of traders out there look to capitalize on this overreaction, right? To see if we can start to fill the gap back up. And that's exactly what I personally did, and I know a bunch of other people did that as well, when they capitalize on this move up in Boeing, right? And now, you know, we're going to look for this, you know, next fill back up to about $415. And this is also, you know, what other, you know, longer-term investors, for example, look for. Whenever there's an earnings miss, but the fundamentals of the company are still in sound, in check, and the stock falls, longer-term investors look to hop in those points as dip buys, right? This could potentially be, not saying it is, do your own research, right? This could potentially be a nice little dip buy for the longer-term investor. This is what people look for. Dips from news earnings reports that could be overreactions to hop in and average down on their positions, right? That's just a little lesson that we can get here from Boeing stock and things like this, guys, they happen literally every single day in the stock market.  Not always do they fill the gap, not always, guys. You know, more times than not, the stock does end up just selling off more, but, you know, there are instances where we gap down and we slowly start to fill back up. So that is what I'm looking at in terms of Boeing stock ticker symbol BA. Now, let's take a look at some other stocks that did very well today that I'm looking to potentially trade here over these next couple of days. So Apple, guys, we called this one out yesterday, and it's looking like it's filling the gap from where we called it out at about 176, the old resistance, which is now a new support, back up to about 185. So this is a stock I'm watching very closely to potentially trade tomorrow. Another one that did very well today was YY. This one filled the gap from about $77 up to about $80. I called this one out this morning in the chat. I personally didn't trade it, but it ended up going according to plan exactly how I ended up calling it out. I called it out, I believe at about $77-ish or something like that. And from there, we did end up filling the gap all the way back up to $80. So now tomorrow, I'm going to be waiting to see, are we going to hold $80 as a new support to slowly fill the gap back up to $85. Ticker symbol YY, very interested in seeing what's going to happen there. Let's take a look at some tech stocks. I said all of them did very well, at least the ones that I track. Amazon up $50 today, up about 3%. It's looking to test this resistance for a potential breakout there to the next resistance at about 1770. That could be a potential 100-point move there in Amazon. Netflix today up about $9, up about 2.6%. Looking for a potential breakout of that 50-SMA there, that resistance, very strong resistance there. Google up about $33 today, guys, up about 3%. We actually did call out Google in yesterday's video. So whoever ended up trading Google today, congrats to you. You did very, very well. Up $33, the perfect bounce on the 50-SMA, the perfect continuation of the uptrend. That's what we're seeing. And Microsoft, guys, up about 2% today. We're at that resistance at about 112. Looking for a potential breakout to test all-time highs. Or are these all-time highs? I'm pretty sure they are at about $116. Yup, they are all-time highs. So these are our levels, guys, on the tech stocks that I'm watching very, very closely. And again, for those of you guys that want to see three stocks that I'm personally thinking about swing trading, go check out the video that I uploaded before this one today. You'll find value in it, I guarantee you. But that's it for today's video, guys. I'm going to wrap it up here. For everybody that did end up enjoying this video, feel free to go down below, hit that like button, subscribe if you're new, and drop a comment. Let me know what you guys ended up doing today. I would love to know. As always, I appreciate all you guys watching for all the longtime viewers. I appreciate you all so much. If you're a new viewer, I appreciate you for staying this far as well. I'll catch you all in the next video. Have a great one. Peace out.


It's like, no, no, they're geniuses. It really helps. So I would say to people, no, do not go out and say, I'm going to be great at the two things I'm worst at. Say, I'm going to let people know what I'm great at, know what I'm decent at and what I'm terrible at. And when they ask me to do things I'm terrible at in short bursts, I will grind through that and let them know that I'm going to do the best I can in an area that's hard for me. I love that because I feel like such a big part of all of this. This emotional intelligence piece is just so important and it's often missing in these environments where there's this burnout, where is this frustration? And it's not just the self-awareness. Self-awareness is great, but it's also the self-compassion. So once you recognize those strengths and weaknesses and saying, you know what, like I can be compassionate around the fact that I'm just not tenacious. That's not me. I will block myself off. I'll create two hours where I'm going to force myself to do it, but then after those two hours I'm going to be compassionate to myself knowing that I put myself in a burnout state. I put myself in a place that is great frustration for me. And I think so often we are quick to be self-awareness and focus on self-awareness like, oh, great. I know these strengths and weaknesses. Then we get really excited when we can read other people.  And we love that side of things, but we're not always good at taking these and practically using them in our life to create that work environment for ourselves and others to be most successful. Self-compassion is far more, if you stop at self-awareness, now you just know why you're feeling bad about yourself sometimes. But you have to go, no, I'm actually supposed to celebrate who I am. And that's not a sixth grade poster for like, that's reality. We had pastors, a couple pastors called us up after this came out and they took it.  And I thought, how dare I be a pastor if I can't come up with a good talk? He did this. He realized I have no WRI. And then I said, well, what do you have? And he told me, I said, so you're probably a great counselor, right? And you probably are really good at working with your staff. He goes, oh, I love that. I'm like, you can't have all of these. So he said, okay, now I can borrow somebody with WNI to help me write my homilies. I'm not going to feel guilty about that anymore.  I don't like to do counseling. And I look at their working genius. I'm like, yeah, that's how God made you. So why don't you organize your work to the greatest extent possible to lead into your geniuses? And it changes everything.


The next item of business is topical questions, and if a member wishes to request a supplementary, they should press the request-to-speak button during the relevant question or enter the letter's RTS in the chat function if online, and at question number one I call Megan Gallagher. Thank you, Presiding Officer, to ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to appeal the decision of the Court of Session that UK Government acted lawfully when enacting a section 35 order in relation to the Gender Recognition Reform, Scotland Bill. We note the judgment and will consider its terms. Devolution is fundamentally flawed if the UK Government is able to override the democratic wishes of the Scottish Parliament and veto our laws at the stroke of a pen. The Scottish Parliament passed this bill with a large majority, including members of all parties. It's not really an answer on the timeframe, though, is it, Cabinet Secretary? SNP ministers were warned on multiple occasions that their gender self-id bill threatens the protection for women and girls in Scotland. However, the SNP ignored our warnings. The scandal of the double-rapist Islay Bryson proved that predatory men will try to exploit self-identification to gain access to vulnerable women's spaces, but the SNP plowed on regardless and took the UK Government to court to get this bill enacted. Does the cabinet secretary think that the £230,000 wasted on this court challenge was money well spent? Until ministers make a decision on the appeal, those are still live legal proceedings, and it does restrict what I can say on the matter. With reference to some of the examples that the member gives, I point out that that is under the current gender recognition act, as passed by Westminster, and appropriate right the way through the United Kingdom. On the matter of the issues that were debated at Parliament, I point out that at no point did the UK Government suggest, threaten or even approach the subject of a section 35 being ordered as the bill went through Parliament. It was subject to two consultations in public and a very large amount of parliamentary scrutiny. While the Government is disappointed with the judgment, we will take time to reflect on that, and we will come back with our decision on the appeal in due course. On the timeframe, there is no answer on the amount of money that the bill has already cost the taxpayer. Opinion poll after opinion poll has shown that the SNP's gender bill remains unpopular, with each of its provisions, such as letting 16-year-olds change their legal gender, being opposed by a large majority of the public. When it comes to wasting further taxpayers' money with a potential court appeal, will the cabinet secretary be listening to the public and ditch this bill for good, or will she be in favour of her green coalition partners, who want to spend endless amounts of public money getting this flawed bill enacted instead? I am sure that Meghan Gallagher must be aware that the costs are already in the public domain because I answered a parliamentary question on it, so we are certainly not hiding anything on the costs to date. The reason why this was an important legal challenge and it was not a decision that we took lightly, we considered it very carefully, but there is an emerging pattern of interference in devolved matters by the UK Government. The routinely now ignore constitutional convention that the UK Parliament will not legislate for devolved issues without the consent of the Scottish Parliament. In 2021, the UK Government of course referred the UNCRC incorporation bill to the Supreme Court. It has now ignored legislative consent decisions of this Parliament on several occasions such as the European Union Withdrawal Act, the UK Internal Market Act, the Professional Qualifications Act and the Subsidy Control Act. There are also several instances in which the UK Government has refused to acknowledge the Scottish Parliament's view that legislative consent is required, such as the Nationality and Borders Act. As we have seen with the breaches of the sole convention, once this sort of intervention has happened, the UK Government will find it easier to justify using this power again and further erode devolution. The Government makes no apologies for standing up to the power of the Scottish Parliament. The next supplementary question will be from Karen Adam. I agree with the cabinet secretary that the court of session ruling was a demonstration of the fundamental flaws of devolution. A equal note last Friday will have been disappointing and traumatic for many. Will the Scottish Government give an unequivocal commitment to continue to do all that it can to support the community? What assurances can the cabinet secretary give today that any decision in relation to the ruling will be treated with the utmost sensitivity? The section 35 order raises very serious questions about devolution, as I have said in my previous answers, but we acknowledge the specific impact on the chance community has had. Yesterday, I had a series of calls with LGBTQI and women's organisations and I heard about the disappointment and dismay in the trans community. I want to be very clear that, no matter what happens with this legal challenge, the Scottish Government remains committed to the LGBQTI equality. That is why we are taking forward legislation on ending conversion practices in Scotland, why we have published our non-binary action plan and why we are taking forward steps to improve access to NHS gender identity services. I am very grateful. When the cabinet secretary made a statement to Parliament in April outlining the intent to take the suggestion, I asked her about the wider supports for trans people in the intervening period because a vacuum is created in any legal process. She said at that time that although the Government viewed the bill as important, it was not the only area that they are working on to support the trans community in Scotland. Can she update the chamber further in terms of what is being done to support trans people right now and in any further intervening period before the Government takes the decision? I thank Paul O'Kane for that question and he did quite rightly raise the wider and varied concerns of the trans community when we discussed this item in the chamber previously. I mentioned some of those aspects in my answer to Karen Adam around the non-binary action plan, which was a very important piece of work that has been undertaken by my colleague Emma Roddick. We are absolutely committed to taking forward that end-of-conversion practices bill before the end of the year. We are very keen to make sure that we are moving forward on this and particularly around aspects around health services, where I know that there are a number of concerns in the trans community. We have started to see improvements there, but there is still much more work to do. The Court judgment has vindicated the concerns of women's rights campaigners that the gender reform bill would negatively impact on the operation of the Equality Act and therefore on the protections for women and girls. Now that the Government has been forced to face the folly of their position, will they take this timely opportunity to apologise to women's rights campaigners for dismissing their concerns as not valid? Clearly, all the way through the passage of the two consultations and of the bill, there were meetings with a varied number of groups who supported the bill, those who supported the bill's but suggested changes and those who were vehemently opposed to it. I would point out to the member that the judgment, although it was based on the gender recognition, is around the aspects around the section 35 order, which quite frankly draws a corch in horses through the devolutionary process. That is something that I am disappointed that the member is not more concerned about. 86 MSPs from across the political spectrum supported the underlying aims and principles of the bill. Just as equally there are many who undoubtedly would not support any form of change to gender reform in legislation, but given that many of us who did support those principles did so under firm reassurances from ministers that the legal advice they had sought was sound, can I ask if it would now seem prudent for the Government to make some of that legal advice public if nothing else to demonstrate that it acted in good faith with Parliament? Clearly neither the Scottish Government or UK Government routinely published their legal advice, so this is not something that is a special significance to the Scottish Government, but also exactly the same process that the UK Government would hold to as we have discussed the section 35 order. What I would say to Jamie Greene is that he is quite right to point out that there were differing views as that passed through, but it did pass through Parliament. This is a bill that passed through with the consent of the large majority of MSPs, including people from all parties, and it is disappointing that the voice of the Scottish Parliament has been vetoed at this nature. To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the letter from the UK foreign secretary to Scotland's constitution secretary, what its response is to reports that the UK Government may withdraw foreign commonwealth and development office support for Scottish Government overseas meetings? I will be helpful to the member and to the chamber to provide some background and context. In April, the former foreign secretary James cleverly wrote to me and issued inaccurate and misleading guidance to UK overseas missions regarding the Scottish Government's international engagements. I wrote him as to cleverly seeking agreement and consultation on how the guidance could be amended or withdrawn. I did not receive or reply. I then received another letter from Mr cleverly in October raising the matter of meeting between the First Minister and the Prime Minister of Iceland. This letter also contained inaccuracies and I wrote back to Mr cleverly, but again I did not receive or reply. This week I received yet another letter, this time from the new foreign secretary, Lord David Cameron, including the threat referenced by Dr Alasdair Allan. This is all the most surprising, as Lord Cameron had a few days earlier cancelled a meeting that we were due to have this week to discuss these issues. Scottish Government's only interest in pursuing our international work is promoting Scotland's interests. Yesterday we published detailed evidence setting out the way that the Scottish Government international offices support trade, jobs and vital business connections. The report also refers in positive terms to the working relationship with the FCDO in overseas posts and I look forward both to continuing to promote Scotland's interests and to working with the UK Government counterparts. I thank the cabinet secretary. The Framers of the Scotland Act were clear that the reservation of international relations does not have the effect of precluding the Scottish ministers and officials from communicating with other countries, regions or international or European institutions, so long as the representatives of the Scottish Parliament or the Scottish ministers do not purport to speak for the United Kingdom or to reach agreements that commit the UK. Can the Scottish Government confirm that it would seem that the Government here is being accused of not respecting the devolved settlement for clarity? Can the cabinet secretary confirm whether the First Minister or indeed any other minister has purported to commit the UK to any international agreement? First, Dr Allan was quoting from the explanatory notes around the Scotland Act, so it is a statement of fact in his question. In answer to the question specifically, no Scottish Government minister has or would purport to speak for the United Kingdom or to reach agreements that commit the UK. In fact, I asked James Cleverley for any examples of such a thing. He said that he had none. We invite FCDO officials to attend our formal meetings. It is impossible to predict where and when informal meetings will happen during large-scale events such as COP28.  The engagement that Scotland undertakes with our international partners plays a key role in helping to attract inward investment and to promote brand Scotland. That is now being threatened by an unelected Lord for the sake of the UK's politics of insecurity and petulance. Does the cabinet secretary agree that, regardless of one's view on the constitution, anyone who cares about the standing of this Parliament should recognise and call out this attempt at muscling Scotland's elected institutions? Anyone in doubt of the benefits of our work overseas should take a look at the report on the work of Scotland's international network, which highlights the real benefits being delivered to Scotland now. Trying to limit that work will only reduce the opportunities for Scottish businesses, cultural organisations and individuals and, in so doing, impact negatively on the lives of us all. While the Scottish ministers clearly have a role to play in promoting Scotland abroad, that should never infringe on the devolution settlement, which of course reserves foreign affairs to the UK Government and by meeting with President Erdogan of all people to discuss foreign policy, namely the situation in the Middle East, the First Minister acted against both the spirit and letter of an established protocol that requires FCDO official attendance and is crucially a requirement that applies equally to UK ministers as it does to Scottish ministers. Given that his Government's own annual report highlighted a number of good examples of joint international working by officials from Scotland's two Governments, where FCDO support has been critical, will he now give a firm commitment that all future Scottish Government meetings with overseas officials will have a representative from the Foreign Office present? Donald Cameron has brought up the letter of the law. The Scotland Act states very clearly. Let me quote again to the chamber what it says. The reservation of international relations does not have the effect of precluding the Scottish ministers and officials from communicating with other countries, regions or international or European institutions so long as the representatives of the Scottish Parliament or the Scottish ministers do not purport to speak for the United Kingdom or to reach agreements which commit the UK. I have always been happy to be accompanied by representatives of the UK embassies or high commissions whenever I undertake international meetings. That is the position of the Scottish Government. Unfortunately, the FCDO officials sometimes do not make themselves available. Thank you. That concludes the Topical Questions.