What's going on, everybody? Welcome back to another edition of the Fandal Hurry Up. You're with Justin Henry. Today I'll be talking about the Atlanta Falcons and their top three fantasy football options heading into the 2022 season. Now the Atlanta Falcons are going through a little bit of a rebuild, but it's okay. I got three guys that can help out your fantasy team. The first is Kyle Pitts, who had an amazing rookie year over a thousand yards, only one touchdown, so he left a little bit to be desired, but we know what the framework is for this amazing second year player. Kyle Pitts is gonna have a strong season. He's being drafted right now as one of the top four tight ends in fantasy drafts. I think he has potential to be a top two option. That's even with Marcus Marriota as the quarterback. So a lot of people are concerned about his value overall because of the quarterback situation. Marcus Marriota has been able to help a lot of the tight ends that he's played with. We saw Delaney Walker have a Pro Bowl season with Marcus Marriota, so I'm not too concerned about Kyle Pitts' value, and he's gonna be the wide receiver one for this team. In order for the Falcons to move the ball, it's gonna have to go through Kyle Pitts, and I do expect him to increase his touchdown production that he had last season. The next player I wanna talk about is Drake Lennon, first round pick, eighth overall, big frame receiver, six foot four, 220 pounds, all the things you wanna see in a prototypical wide receiver one, but he is a rookie. So you wanna be careful when you're drafting him. Probably having that wide receiver three range don't reach too far on him. He'll be an amazing talent, especially later on down the league for those dynasty guys, a great pick. But for redraft this season, I like him, but more as an upside wide receiver three play, especially later in the year. So if you see him struggling early on, go ahead and trade for him. I think he'll be a good player. He's the type of receiver you wanna have, big frame, can go get the ball, uses his hands and great body control. So just keep him on your draft board, make sure that he's not slipping too far because people don't recognize the name, but a great rookie pick. And last but not least, wanna talk about Cordero Patterson, who had a phenomenal year last year, kind of came out of nowhere. Everybody expected Mike Davis to be the guy that took over the running back backfield. And it was Cordero Patterson who stepped up, had a monster season, including catching the rock as well, played a little bit of that combination, running back wide receiver role. So we saw them using him very versely. And then towards the end of the season, he fell off a little bit. So that's why you'll see his draft capital go a little bit lower than it should. Earlier in the year, he was valued as like a top 50 player. And then towards the end of the season, he was a back hundred player. So I think right now where he's going in drafts is perfect.  He'll probably be, you know, in the RB3, RB4 range and have potential for more. So I don't think we should write Cordero Patterson completely off, but don't expect the same production we saw early in the season last year. Let me know what you guys think. Are those your top three players for the Falcons? Or you got somebody else in mind? As always, take advantage of the offer below and we'll see you on the next hurry yet.


What's up everyone take down here welcome back to the channel today I'm going to be sharing with you my biggest fears. Yes take down has fears So the reason I decided to make this video is Halloween is right around the corner I have nothing else planned for a Halloween video, and I don't think I shared anything like this yet So that's why I decided to do it today. So my first fear is heights That's something that's been one of my biggest fears for my entire life. Honestly, it's getting a lot better I think the reason for that is I worked retail for five years and working retail You're required to go up ladders get big heavy awkward things off the shelves for customers And that's something I didn't like doing. It's not that I'm scared of heights. It's what I'm doing at the height What the task is so if I'm up a ladder and I'm having to lean off or shift my weight or anything like that That's what really freaks me out since I'm not working retail anymore heights isn't a big concern of mine It's definitely not my preference. I don't prefer to go up a ladder to do anything But I'm coping with it. I'm getting a lot better at it And it's something that I can deal with if I have to go do it. It just depends what I'm doing at heights So I guess it is still a fear of mine. I don't like heights, but I'm getting a lot better at it It's not like a few years ago a few years ago. I'd get up a ladder whenever I was at work I would get up the ladder and I would just start to shake my legs would start to buckle and I just couldn't do it So now that I'm not in that job. I'm not required to go up ladders pretty much every day I don't have that problem right now if I have to go up a ladder. I'm okay with it It just depends on what I have to do on the ladder So it's getting a lot better the next thing is a really big thing with me and it is public speaking So whether it is in a crowd at school at work Whatever the case may be if I have to talk in front of a crowd or a large group of people I can't do it.  I used to hate doing debates or anything like that That's why whenever I was in high school I switched English classes because I could not get up to do it.  I don't like when everybody is staring at me Everybody is listening to me. Everybody is watching me I think that honestly is the biggest thing for me I think honestly that is the reason why this is a fear of mine. It's just I don't like people staring at me I don't like getting all of the attention. I think that must be the biggest thing That's why this is one of my fears So the next fear is going to the doctors I don't know if it's necessarily going to the doctors as if I'm scared of the doctors I just don't like to receive bad news So if I know I'm either a sick or there's a problem with my body or whatever the case may be Or if it's the dentist or whatever it is If I know by going to the doctors I'm going to receive bad news I try to hold off and postpone going to the doctors as long as I can I know at times that's probably not the smartest thing to do Because if I am sick and I don't get it looked at whatever the case may be It could get worse and it could cause more problems But that is honestly a risk I take I'm just so scared to get bad news If I see that there is a problem I just try to keep my eye on it And hope that it goes away on its own Most of the time if it doesn't I will go to the doctors Eventually but I never go to the doctors right away It's just one of my biggest fears I don't think it's just doctors It's probably some other stuff too But doctors is the one thing that reminds me of it Because I just don't like to receive bad news So that's one reason why I avoid the doctors I avoid the dentist I avoid stuff like that Just because I don't want to receive the bad news So if I don't have to go to the doctors I won't go to the doctors So these have been my biggest fears I know I only chose three there's probably more But these are my biggest fears right now Most of them I am getting better at Most of them aren't as bad as they used to be Whenever I was in high school they were way worse most of these But right now it's kind of settling out But they're still the biggest fears that I have right now Comment down below what kind of fears you have How you are dealing with them Are you coping with them or are they getting better Let me know down in the comments And I'll see you guys in the next video Hope you guys did enjoy Please take care Peace


We did not want to participate in something that we believe to have some kind of smell to it and we are declaring by walking out that we're not participating in this connectivity. We're here to say today that we believe that there's something evil about using the procedure of a house especially something as severe as holding someone in contempt of Congress to further political aims. A full house vote on criminal contempt charges has been scheduled for next week and if it passes the matter would then be handed over to the local U.S. Attorney and Scott he's unlikely to move to prosecute his own boss Eric Holder so that's likely about as far as this will go.


Everyone's different here at the Canopy Workspace, different organisations, projects and specialisms. But here inside the Entopia building, there's also a common goal that brings us together. There's a collective desire to accelerate change, and sustainability is at the heart of it. The Canopy is all about collaboration, a community sharing and learning from each other's experiences. And this is Canopy Connect, a podcast where you can get to know your fellow members at the Canopy. This time on the podcast. Hi, my name is Patrick Usborne and I'm the co-founder of Perpendicular Architecture and established the Positive Collective. So, let's connect. So the reason why we formed Perpendicular Architecture was on the back of three main issues, which were, and still are, happening. And that was firstly to do with how do we actually really tackle sustainability with an evidence-based approach, which was being talked about an awful lot, but not really understood fully. Secondly, also innovation in construction. So there was a lot of designs being put to the front which claim they were sustainable, but actually the way in which they were built were very traditional and actually inherently use a lot of carbon to build them. So we felt actually there was an opportunity there to really think about how we could build innovatively with that sustainability mindset. And then lastly, social value. Social value was always put one side by many architectural firms, which we found not the right approach and actually by integrating social value from the outset alongside sustainability and innovative design. Those three married up really well and that's what we wanted to focus on and that's why we started Perpendicular Architecture. So the work we do day by day is almost two-fold. So it's actually in a traditional architectural sense that we design and deliver buildings along with our clients. We're working in particular on a lot of housing schemes, so for private professional individuals who are going to be needing to build 100 homes, for example, on a site. So we'll be working alongside them. The other part is very much an educational part. So all of the clients we work with, they know they need to do more. They know they need to think about sustainability in a completely different way in which they were dealing with sustainability before, but they don't know how. So they come to us to have a better understanding on the process to be able to achieve a sustainable development, a building, and we'll help them through that. So we'll engage with them and we'll advise them from a very early stage in a consultancy piece who they should be working with. And then once that team is established, then we'll work with them to deliver those buildings. Sustainability, we always are wary of that word because it's so overused. So the way in which we're approaching sustainability now is moving beyond our net carbon zero goals for 2050 and how can we start to regenerate the environment around us? And we're finding actually a lot of architectural firms have signed up to the ROBA 2030 Challenge. They understand exactly what needs to be done and that's really positive. That's a huge benefit. However, not all of them will be integrating how to build innovatively and also how to integrate social value into their designs. Even though you'll have architectural firms who are very good at one or two of those, there's fewer which are good at all of those and it's a big ask. It's very complex trying to integrate all of these different ways of thinking and design. It's very difficult to do, but that's certainly something that we're hoping to strive to be able to do and grow from there. We've been working with and collaborating with others in particular to try and find ways to integrate social value without necessarily fully quantifying it. So the issue with social value is that it's very qualitative approach to design. It's very much based on the needs of the local stakeholders, the local community, depending on the building that you're building. So trying to really understand how can you fully design alongside the local community, the local stakeholders, is the first step to be able to do that and really put placemaking at the forefront. Because if you're looking at the quality of life that we have at the moment, there is huge, vast improvements that can be made to where we are at the moment and that's evident in so many places. Not least, for example, the NHS and the amount of money the NHS is spending in particular on improving people's health through living in poor conditions. We've all seen stories of mould infestations in particular housing. So it's very clear housing is not fit for purpose at the moment. There's an enormous amount we can do to help with that. But also in terms of placemaking and ensuring that we've got happy communities who are encouraged to speak to one another, to rob shoulders with each other outside of their own homes and there's a lot that can be done in terms of placemaking as well. The future vision that I see is a fully integrated society and what I mean by that is that we are reconnecting ourselves to the local environment around us. So that's the local biodiversity, nature in particular, but also each other. And that's where the social value comes in. So I very much see the future where we can fully realign ourselves and understand each other's needs and actually support each other in a way where value overrides this idea about cost or this idea about that to be able to succeed in life we need to earn a certain amount of money. These are just such basic principles which are no longer the right way to go. For us to be responding to the needs of our planet but also each other in society we need to do so much more to actually create value and think about the benefits to the environment and each other. So yeah, my vision for the future is definitely one where people can work collectively together to support one another and in doing so supporting the environment around them as well. I really was interested in the canopy, mainly from when I joined the Accelerator program about a year ago. So there was the Accelerator program in the built environment two years ago now. In fact, time flies by and that was a brilliant six-week program to really understand how we can grow our business and collaborate with others. And when I heard that Antopia will be opening and part of that building will be for the Canopy members it just made complete sense. The big huge benefit of being within a community is to be able to share knowledge seamlessly and the industry, the construction industry historically has been very blinked in the way in which they approach a problem and they look within the industry first to be able to find a solution. When actually a solution might come from any direction and often or not it will do. So to be able to sit alongside other, those who are looking into agricultural issues, into textile issues, into a whole raft of different sectors and bringing that knowledge within will inevitably help the problems that we're trying to solve. And I think hopefully vice versa as well for us, especially on the back of being a member on the Accelerator program, is that we found as architects we're almost in hopefully a strong position to be able to bring people together and to actually find a home for some of the solutions people are coming to the fore with. So especially in terms of the material and innovation is actually we're very well placed to be able to specify the materials that others are innovating with and actually seeing those being built with. If you want to know a little bit more about what Peppenticler does, the best way of doing it is coming down to the ground floor in Entopia and I'll pretty much always be there apart from the odd trip away from Cambridge to be able to have a conversation and we always feel conversations are far more powerful than reading a website. However, we do have a website and our website is always being updated alongside a dedicated website for the positive collective which if you enter that into Google, you'll get the website. Thanks for checking out this episode of Canopy Connect. Log in to your Office R&D profile to connect with your Canopy neighbors. Just head to the members page and find them. This is a Canopy podcast made by Newell-Ottman. The Canopy is part of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership supported by the European Regional Development Fund. Thank you for listening.


Do you want streams for free be nice? You would like streams for free. It would be nice I think streams for free are a good thing. I wouldn't even say a great thing and There's plenty of ways to get streams for free that are not scams And that's what we're about to talk about right now So let's get into it the first way matter of fact I want to say this not only are we gonna say that the ways to get streams for free that are not scams But we're gonna give you the deep dive within each topic on how we've gone about it seen it helped artists do it themselves So you can apply it for yourself. So make sure you stay all the way through because it's coming from real experience and You know, it's free. Check this out. Cory Telling why content is one of the top free Breakdowns and how we will go about it going to 2023. Yeah, right like today not content You know that that's already been out there in a way people have been moving before. Yeah. Yeah I mean content is the great equalizer because me one for the most part is Relatively cheap to free depending on your initial investment to be able to create the content right like the equipment Most of us got phones. So we have the ability to at least create something You know I'm saying even if it's not amazing, but I says the great equalizer because that one Tiktok that you shot could hit a thousand new people could hit a hundred thousand new people, right? And so it has a chance to Offset the cost of other things that you maybe would want to spend money on or even get you attention For free that you have to pay for a great example is everybody watching this YouTube video right now, right? All this attention is free We could have paid for it which all are here because we put this podcast episode out, right? And so you need to be looking at your pieces of content the same. I'm gathering people for free I'm building people up for free Now the way that we typically Explained the clients to go about it is one just pick somewhere between one to three platforms to focus on I think I would say maybe two at least because I do think that one is just power numbers To you're able to learn a lot faster about cultural differences of platforms and things like that because you can compare the stuff Right. Oh, they act this way when I post on YouTube versus when I post on my tiktok or whatever So I do think that's important and then you know, we believe in like omnipresent buildings So trying to hit the same person or group of people on a couple of different platforms and a couple of different places So because I say pick one of three platforms Commit everything you can to just learning the ins and outs of those platform how the algorithm works What content creators not just music artists, but just content creators are doing on that platform in order to stay Relevant and also what music artists are doing. I'm a firm believer in every platform you commit to Go find like three to five other artists who you just like the way they do things and just like study them And I watched them and see if they're doing things that you could copy and emulate to some degree That's the big thing right there. Mm-hmm behind the people that you want to emulate Yeah, yeah, cuz like they already figured out a lot of hard work You know, now you just come on behind and out of your own style and like characteristics to it So really big on that and then the last thing we always tell them to do was like make sure you actually use a platform Use it at least like 30 minutes Maybe an hour a day scroll through tiktok scroll through Twitter Whatever the platform you've chosen to master is you need to be using it pretty consistently because we talk about a lot There are a lot of times cultural things that you're doing your content that determines whether or not it goes Not the content itself.  Do you use tiktok?   So tiktok lame as fuck, bro Shit ain't for me It's like you got to use it, bro But literally we just start people that man pick pick a handful of platforms that you're gonna commit to one to three like I recommend at least to Find some regular content creators that you can study Find some music artists who use that platform where that you can study and then just use that shit use the platform every day 30 minutes to an hour at least just to get a feel for it and I guess the fifth tip will be just start making shit I'm saying start experimenting because there gonna be a lot of things that We could say and maybe even other like social media gurus might be saying to you that won't really click for you until you start Creating things and you get why we're saying what we're saying, right? Oh, this is the reason the hook is important because I know it's my watch time keeps falling off in the first two seconds Oh, that's why Sean keeps I need a hook on my videos to hold people's attention, right?  Let me take a quick second to say if you're an artist trying to blow your music up Or if you're a manager music professional in general trying to help an artist blow their music up I have something that's a game changer for you and it's completely Free as you may know we've helped multiple artists go from zero to hundreds of thousands of streams We've helped multiple artists go from hundreds of thousands of millions of streams chart on billboard go viral all of that stuff And we've now made the way we've branded multiple artists and help them go viral completely free step-by-step in Brand man network all you have to do is check out brand man network comm you apply It's completely free, but the thing is we're not gonna let everybody in forever So the faster you apply the better your chance of getting accepted brand man network comm check it out Back to the video. I'm gonna go back to when you talked about the fact that artists should find people They want to look at as an example on the platform. Yeah now There's some specificity to that and then there's one thing I want to add Don't necessarily look for artists who are big on the platform because they're already a big name a household name They might be doing some cool stuff and it might be getting engagement, but they might be winning because they're already winning Yeah, you know I'm saying so find somebody who's new and they're upcoming and you like what they're doing And there's things that you could pull from them because they're probably winning because they're good at using the platform Yeah, which is very very different especially when you're starting up And all you're trying to do is trying to figure out how to use the platform again and it's about what you like you like how they're moving about it and You can see yourself doing the type of content that they're doing right because you might not Be somebody who's gonna go outside and come up with these weird locations and shoot these beautiful shots or anything like that You might just be a bedroom person in it So you're like, oh, yeah, they're making the bedroom work or I like to move outside And I would keep doing that because I hate being in the house and just creating in this space So maybe you like going and do different locations so that's something you might want to do all those things matter And then besides other artists just find other creators Yeah, that are doing shit that you feel like you can apply to yourself So now, you know, you might not be able to do it exactly the same way because you want to figure out how to make it matter to an artist All right but you can still find that inspiration for from a couple and I don't know if you said how many you would recommend that people like five or seven Okay, yeah, I would say seven max seven max, especially if you're talking about artists and non-artists Yeah, and then that whole idea is to siphon the things from them that you would like to repeat. So that means You aren't taking anything Holy from anybody. Yeah, right. I just need to find oh that one specific format I like that they do that and they're winning with that format this one specific format I like that they do that and then I Want to flip that because the entire game when it comes to content is about stacking formats It tick tock really brought that to a head But now people are copying it so you know it's going to become more and more relevant on other platforms where You find a perform at their works and that format will kill but that doesn't mean I could just drop any type of content now That that format will be the only thing that's doing well on your page and you're trying to figure out Well, should I only just do that now? No You do that format you exploit the hell of that format and that format might become the 80% that you're doing at the moment But formats don't last forever So you need to always be testing to find the next format in the remaining 20% So you got this 80 80 80 20 20 20 oh snap. I got a second format So now I just had added a second format and now I'm doing these two formats 80% of the time possibly all right or maybe it's like a 60 20 between those two but in the rest of it I'm trying to find another format. Oh snap now. I got three formats experiment experiment experiment now I got four content formats that work.  One of them just died out. It's not doing good anymore But I still got three left Most people find themselves in a position where they got one that format start popping And then it dies and they don't know what to do and they feel like oh my page just stopped working forever and now I might need to start a completely new page because I'm shadow band or something like that It's a life cycle that happens with these formats and if you don't exploit formats You probably don't even know why it worked in the first place All right, so you need to start being able to understand why a format's working before you even Maximize the platform to its fullest. So format stacking is a huge Key and how you should look at Your approach to your content as well. Make sure you like subscribe share this thing I didn't mention before but we will mention it in the future. We are going to get to 1 million subscribers We're only at 123,000 right now, but we set our sights on a 1 million subscribers and we're serious about it We're happy that y'all are long for the journey But don't keep this sauce to yourself Share it with your family friends and whoever so we can get there. That's all I ask I'm brand man. Sean. I'm kory and we out


So I'm part of the National Agency for Spatial Planning. We have published a 2019 report on land data about Kenya, Tanzania, South Sudan, Uganda, South Africa, Namibia and Senegal, which will continue in 2023 with Botswana and Zambia also. The objective of Land Portal is to develop SOLE for 12 African countries between now and next year, 2024. Although the SOLE reports are the product of independent research, this is only the first stage for land data. The Open Guide for Land Governance is a tool for national and local government agencies, with a mandate for or an interest in making their land governance data open and available for others to reuse. The guide is the result of a collaboration between the Land Portal Foundation and Open Data Charter. To mark the new publication, the Land Portal has convened this panel to discuss key questions and issues that have emerged in land data and information. A few additional logistical notes about the webinar before beginning. I just wanted to say that it is organized as a dynamic conversation with our panelists who I want to thank. So it is a dynamic conversation to get more insights into these initiatives. We'll have a few rounds of questions with our panelists. And then the audience will have the opportunity to participate by asking your questions. For the questions, it's very simple. Please use the Q&A button. The panelists will answer so that we can get as much information as possible. Let me introduce to you the lineup of speakers that we have for today from Land Portal and all the different organizations. Thank you for organizing this webinar. It is an honor to have with us today the Director of Spatial Planning of the National Agency for Spatial Planning. This is Umu Kalsum Kulesek who participates in the planning of this same national agency. Then we have Abdu Karim Imbenghe, head of the National Observatory of Territories. Next up is Charles Tom Bayer, project leader of the Open Up Guide project in Senegal and co-leader of the Open Data work at Land Portal. Natalia Karfi will also speak. She is the Executive Director of the Open Data Charter and Open Government Partnership Steering Committee, who has also worked on the production of this report on Senegal. We also have with us Dr. Labali Ture, solely Senegal researcher. So first of all, the Director of ANAT is going to speak. Considering the amount of time that we have, we would like the Director to give some pointers, some introductory remarks. Mr. Director General, the floor is yours to give us the general introductory remarks. Mr. Jigoh, if you're available, the floor is yours. Thank you very much. Mr. Hangom, go ahead. Okay, I'm going to give some introductory remarks. I am part of the National Plan for Territorial Planning and Development. I would like to thank the Land Portal for their collaboration with ANAT in the framework of this webinar. Thank you also to all the people who are participating in this panel, including my dear friends, Labali Ture. The National Plan for Territorial Planning and Development, validated by His Excellency Mr. Maki Sal, President of the Republic, during the Presidential Council on Territorial Planning held on January 24, 2020 and approved by decree number 2022-843 of April 12, 2022. Analyzing territorial information, taking into account land information as a determining factor for good land governance. The data is a crucial point of our national plan. And indeed, with regards to the new orientations of public policies, the mastery of territorial information is a mandatory condition for establishing credible territorial policies that produce results. So, this information is at the beginning, diagnosis and development of strategies, and also at the end of territorial action, and largely determines its chances of success and results. In Senegal, poor mastery of territorial information is reflected, among other things, in a poor command of the dimensions of geographical structuring of community space, an eponymy that is sometimes confused and not standardized, poor mastery and sharing of geographic information, poor mastery of decentralization texts, which results in confusion about missions and prerogatives, the absence of a territorial information system, especially on the actors and their interventions. And the absence of a system for monitoring and evaluating territorial action. Given the role in place of territorial information and the low level of knowledge of the territories to guide development choices, it is necessary to promote the production, updating and sharing of territorial information, particularly land information. It seems like we have a connection problem. Hello. Sorry, I lost my, my connection broke. Yeah, no problem, continue. So the different actions recommended are the production of updated geographic reference, the implementation of geographic information that meets the needs of development actors and promotes the implementation of geographic information systems. Senegal has a national system for public statistics. This system is the national statistic agency and demographics, and these institutions produce data for the various bodies. Senegal, however, the problem with this system in Senegal is that it is not centralized and doesn't facilitate access to data, particularly for strategic and territorial planning purposes. It is also necessary to rethink the system to include local authorities. There are also key data users that exercise specific functions and provide services. The next step is establishing an appropriate legal framework for pooling, sharing and using territorial information. Access to information is not easy for all users and legal frameworks must be put in place for the sharing and use of information. This can be achieved by setting up a single platform that allows useful information to be published in standardized formats, such as on the National Territorial Observatory to enable the planning of the state of development of territories. This will facilitate regulated access to information according to the needs of each user. Regulation and standardization of toponomy. Toponomy concerns the transcription of place names, but also to create a system for territorial entities throughout the national territory. It is important to establish a uniform addressing system at the national level to put into place a sustainable development of the territory as established by the January law. The digital platform is an interactive web mapping application that will be accessible to the public. The census system for all citizens with a specific address allows us to access all information regarding occupation of space, public buildings, but also the people and institutions who risk accountability for tax. The process of putting into place this system and telecommunications system is in progress. The observatory is attempting to collect data from the territory and following development and monitoring policies that takes into account the decision of all stakeholders. We are accountable to law 2020104 of 12th of January 2021 bearing orientation for the planning and sustainable development of territories in article 30. There is also a law from 6th of August 2022. There is an interactive system accessible to the public, which shows all maps and prospects to carry out. In this framework, PNADT is carrying out dynamic mapping and monitoring indicators, as well as the execution of queries for spatial analysis purpose and the download of maps and data. This device contributes to give a new breath to land use planning in Senegal because it accompanies the process of granting the location visa decree number 2022 1088 of May 5th 2022 for coherence in the occupation of space. It is a kind of certificate of territorial coherence. We have been involved in each of these actions. And we pay special attention to the implementation of these actions. We are committed with Land Portal to continue with this reflection. I wish you a successful webinar and a good day to all participants. Thank you. Thank you very much for this detailed exhaustive summary, Mr. Jiggle, particularly regarding the legal documents and the technical aspects. What is important is that you said that information is in the beginning and in the end a success of policies. That is the interest of information, particularly of land data. So you have overcome all the shortcomings of weakness of information in order for a production and updating of this information about the territory. So thank you again, Mr. Jiggle. We're going to move on to the next part of our discussion now. Now all the other panelists are going to participate. I don't know if Charle Thum is ready, is available. Charle, you led the work on land data and you recently published the results for Senegal. Would you like to speak to us a little bit about your experiences in Senegal? Charle, are you there? Yes, I am. Thank you. Thank you, Carter. And thank you also for the remarks by the Director General. I think it was very interesting and it's very exciting to hear that so much is happening in Senegal at the moment. And this is of course why this partnership with the government of Senegal and Anat is so exciting. So let me briefly provide an overview of the results. And I just want to remind our viewers that the reports that you see there are available on the land portal website for download for more detailed investigation into the results. But we can say that in terms of responsible land governance and I think the Director General reflected some of these key points already. But the problem that many countries face is how to improve land governance in the face of these competing demands for resources. And responsible land governance is the way we use and control land in a way that is socially legitimate and democratic. And the lack of responsible governments has a range of negative consequences, which I won't go into detail but which have already been mentioned as well. So in order to exercise responsible land governance, we require data and information. This access to information is crucial for achieving good land governance and to be able to open up land related data can help to democratize that information ecosystem and strengthen the flow of information. From all perspectives and all levels. And I think this can address some of the problems and make the governance of land more democratic, more socially just, and the state of land information and the open up guide our tools to assist in the opening up of this information. And briefly in terms of how we have implemented the process in Senegal at the moment is through two phases and we've been dealing with phase one, which is really mapping the information ecosystem and conducting an assessment of the openness of those resources. And that allows us to understand and describe the state of land information in Senegal in light of the existing policy environment. So what are the findings for Senegal with regards to how land data is government governed. Very interestingly, if we look at the data governance framework in Senegal, we see that there is a strong enabling framework for developing an access to information regime. This includes the international obligations that Senegal already has, as well as its constitutional commitments and a data protection act. And the international instruments Senegal has already signed a lot of commitments at the national level. There are some instruments that are under development, including an open access law. And this is part of Senegal's ogp commitments for 2023. There is also already an existing data protection act. So either these frameworks that are in existence can start serving as the basis for an operational framework for data sharing and increase data availability, because that is an area that Senegal is still lacking in. And Senegal has signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the African Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, all of which provide for access to information as as a right. And if the API law is implemented, it really starts providing a solid underlying operational framework for Senegal. The way we assess the open data in Senegal is to look at openness against 10 open data criteria across six categories of data. So we look at land policy data, we look at land tenure data, we look at land use data, we look at land development data and land value data. These data categories are derived from the framework for land administration, because these are the land related services that people are expected to deliver. And it is important to note here that in assessing the data for openness, we don't just look at data that is public. We look at 10 components of which publishing data online is only one component. And this is something that I want to emphasize because in a number of situations, countries are publishing data, making that data available and putting it online. But this is not the same as saying that the data is available as open data. We look at whether it is machine readable. What is the license regime if there is a license provided is the data downloadable. How comprehensive is the metadata. We look at uniform resource identifiers, and these 10 criteria together determine the openness of data. So when we look at the results for Senegal, I think it's important that we keep this in mind, because there might be some data that is considered to be available, and it's online. But in this assessment, it would not necessarily be considered as fully open data. So what were the results for Senegal. If you look at this graphic, we can see that legal and policy data is considered to be partially open in Senegal, and there's also a range of other land data types that are partially open. The land development data was only considered to be a little bit open. The land development data largely relates to the land development plans that are published by a nut and made available on its website and its portal, but they are often as PDFs, and as the land development plans, so not very open and that is a little bit one of the reasons for the slightly lower score. In terms of land tenure data land use data and land value data. We can say that there is some data available, but it is typically not open and not online, although it is there it does exist digitally within government departments. There are various kinds of opportunities for making the data more open. And in conclusion, I would just like to say that perhaps what is needed in the way forward is to look at an open land data roadmap for Senegal, where we can use the results from the solely baseline and the open up guide to draw up a roadmap with stakeholders and not as the leading partner to set out categories of data that could be opened up through in some cases purely technical refinement, and I think this would already achieve quite positive impacts for Senegal in terms of improving the openness of data. So with that, I would like to, at this point hand over to Carter and just maybe reflect very quickly on, I think there is an interest and an awareness about open data and the demand for open data in Senegal. While there are some gaps, I think good progress is being made in terms of putting data online and making data available. And I think if you look at the statistical agency and the work they have done, there is clearly also quite a lot of capacity in Senegal with regards to open data and opening up of land data. So thank you, thank you Carter. Thanks a lot for, so apparently we think that we see that land data are not fully open yet, but there's a lot of hope here. I followed this presentation. So I see there's a big opening wheel. I see there are a lot of progress making. And what you said, and did you say that in Senegal we have a low project for what is about data access. And that for me, a lot of hope to improve data and land data access. So I think we can, inside it later, I see there's a lot of questions. So, Umu and Abdul, the Umu and Abdul with land data in Senegal, how are they useful in Senegal? And what does it mean for Senegal? In Africa, land data are more open and more guaranteed for people regarding those data who are just published. Are you online? Yes, we are. Then Umu, the floor is yours. Thanks a lot, my dear Carter. I thank Mr. Jigoh and every panelist and participants. So thanks for the question, Carter. And thank you for Carl for the presentation about land data sharing in Senegal regarding this study for the category of sharing data. And there's an opening of data produced by the agency. Data related to GeoDZ, so there's a call to just produce, like Jogwarapical data, a good mastering of unrestriction and brings less land conflicts and that stop collective territory to give more land than they can. And about analysis of data and sectorial land. So there are land data about the worst land data about subterranean or electrical data. And about telecom, the communication data. Also socio-economical data and educational rights. So those data are only part of the ones who produce them. They are shared thanks to conventions. They are only published under the ANA format. But they cannot be shared. You need the right to the data producer. So that's why it's important to have better land data sharing thanks to the next law. That will help us a lot to have more auto land data sharing. Thanks, Carter. So that's a bit succinct. Thanks a lot, Umu. That's the structure of ANA because it was short. Difference between data produced by ANA and those who are not produced by it but shared by it. So it's a structure who produced it and responsible if yes or not. So it's all about badminton and land data sharing. I think Abdu will speak. Abdu is responsible for land. Can you hear me? Yeah, I can hear you. So the floor is yours. Thanks a lot, Carter. I'll join you, Umu. So hello everyone. Thanks, Carter, for this great presentation, introduction. So we just saw the case of Senegal and this analysis has great points. What's about land data changes and with the opening data, it will be a good political trend, with all the data that are produced in those land plan changes. So the ANA makes available those data more and more. since 2008, and they are all available on the portal VATGEO and also on our portal to have all those portal available and they are open. However, there's also with obstacles at the political level, particularly a poor mastery of information. So all state structures that produce these statistics don't have accuracy, which means that a good part of the data produced comes from Anat. So the aim is to push the governments to adopt these new policies of data exchange to make data accessible to all stakeholders. Another negative point is the lack of territorial information systems, because today the idea is to connect the data directly to councils. Today if we have territorial information about these councils, these districts, we would be able to aggregate all this information integrated and treated centrally. In order to overcome all these shortcomings, the state is putting in place mechanisms to remove these gaps, because our organization is a framework and a model for the collection and sharing of territorial, of land data. We couldn't give more information about the mission of our organization during the discussion, but I wanted to present these points after Charles' presentation. Thank you very much. That's the situation. It's not fantastic because, as our colleagues said, access to data is quite difficult. Nevertheless, I see that there is hope because of the observatory, which has been put into place, and this will contribute to accessibility of all this information. Thank you very much, Abdu, for your presentation, which was really relevant. I'm going to turn to Nathie now. Nathie, why is measuring openness important and how should stakeholders interpret the results presented in the Soli? Thank you very much, Qatar. Here I am. And thanks, everybody, for putting together this seminar. So understanding the state of the art of where government data is as far as openness is very important in order to develop an open data policy that actually addresses the challenges that are being found. The Open Data Charter, the organization that I lead, has been working with tools like the Open Up Guides on different themes around the world. And when we performed these open data assessments worldwide, we have found that in most cases, there is a lot more digitized data, digitalized data than expected. But the thing is that that data is not open following what Tommy actually explained. So data is digitized, but it's not being fully open or fully shared with citizens. So there's a good expectation that data can be open rather quickly. We have found that understanding and having a picture of where of the data sets and the different organizations within government that actually create that data is very important for different things. One of them is that any open data policy in order to be successful actually needs to have a participatory approach to it. It's very important to understand the different areas of government that are creating data because it's not always just one office. There's always one office that leads a theme, but there's always data that is being created and collected by different ministries that actually can help with, in this case, land data understanding. Also, it's very important to connect with data re-users to understand the data demand. We know that opening up data, it's not easy. It's not cheap. It takes on resources, both human and monetary resources. So understanding the data and demand side of the open data policy is very important so that once the opening of the data starts, the government is actually responding to the demand side of data. And you can guarantee that that data is going to be reused because just opening up the data is not enough. The government needs to promote also data re-use. So if you connect data creation with data demand from the get-go, from the very design of the open data policy, you will be guaranteeing that that data is actually going to be reused and prioritized participatory. And then one other thing that we found out throughout the implementations of the open up guide and open up guides worldwide and in this case in Senegal, is that doing this exercise of understanding and mapping out the different data sets has also helped create what we call people interoperability. We connect different actors that haven't been speaking to each other inside of government and from government with civil society and academia. So creating that open data community that can actually help promote the open data policy both from the publication to the data reuse side is very important. Connecting the people that are working within the field is very important for a successful open data policy. So that picture that you might say that you get when you create this mapping of open data is very important to set the stage for that conversation with a multi-stakeholder forum of people around the open data policy. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Natalie, for the very relevant information you just shared with us. It's important to satisfy information sharing and especially to understand the context that exists in each country. Before speaking about new public policies or improving data policies, we must see what exists already and this does allow us to understand this context. The other point that was interesting is that this enables a sharing of experience where we can learn from each other. Thank you very much, Natalie, for your input. I'm going to turn now to Labali. Dear colleague, given the initiatives on open data in Senegal, particularly those of the government and OGP, how important is open land data for researchers and civil society? And how can open land data become a priority for the government in the support of service delivery? I'm asking the country because you're a researcher and I guess you're the right person to ask this question. So please go ahead. Thank you very much. Thank you everybody. I'm very happy to participate on this panel, especially as the co-author of this report on Senegal. I'm delighted to share this space with you. The question is very important and I think that in Senegal, the problem isn't the production of data. It's the operational aspect. We created the national geomatics plan in Senegal and it allows the establishment of Senegalese geospatial data infrastructure, which is a strategic tool to promote the control of territorial resources, the sharing of knowledge and the optimization of territorial development. However, the problem is the development of the initiative and that was my problem as a researcher. There are certain points that are fundamental for research. When we talk about land data, I refer mainly to data regardless of the topic that can be led by different experts, whether they are lawyers, biologists, whatever. We all address the question of land data, but the problem for us is knowing what has been done by who, how and when. We receive many reports, but often it's difficult to access this information. So the data exists, but the level of sharing and access is very weak. That means that for research and civil society, which also has the obligation to access and improve data, we have to distinguish land data from land information. Data is the objective, but information is the starting point. A researcher can help with the right mechanisms and documents to make progress with claims and can help to create trustworthy, reliable data. And that's what I think we really need to reflect upon. Can the data that exists today, can it be made accessible to the scientific community in general? Because they are used in a standard that allows us to access this information. Because usually it's civil society and researchers that carry out this, that organize this data, this information. So we have access to data, but not to the most important data. I think that today, having taken a step back, I think that there is a need to look at the mechanisms that exist today and what isn't working. We can create millions of platforms, but they are useless if the people who create them are not aware of the potential of data. What is the point of having a project worth millions if there isn't any access to the information it provides? It is only useful if civil society can reuse this data for other projects. So that's what we need to solve when it comes to land information at the national, regional and continental level. So that I think that in Senegal, at least, there's a problem with the law, but there are mechanisms, but there's also a problem with the format of data. Because it's one thing to share data, but under what format will we share it? Which format should we send the data in? What kind of file? What kind of document? That's important too. And that's what the GICC has partly solved, but unfortunately, there is still a lot of shortcomings in terms of the creation of data. If we allow openness for civil society and research, we will obtain a lot more land information in Senegal. That would be my answer to that question. Thank you very much. I see one thing coming up often, which is the lack of access to land data. I think every person who has intervened today has highlighted this point, this lack of information. To take what Labali said, it is essential to transform data into accessible formats. This goes for researchers and civil society alike, but also for public decision makers in order to improve public policy. Thank you very much. We have many different questions. We're looking at them, but before moving on to the questions, I would like to know the progress made by Senegal regarding land data in particular. As I said earlier, the point that keeps coming back is the lack of access and difficult access. But the discussions on open land data in Senegal continue to develop and evolve. With this renewed focus on open land data, a key question that is emerging is what more can Senegal do to open data for both government and society? Omo Kalsoum, you have the floor. Thank you. I think Dr Labali partly responded to this point, because he spoke about Senegal's implementation of a national plan, the geometric plan, was the result of a partnership with geospatial data producers. The problem now, as he said, is the meeting of the commitments that were part of this geometric plan, because the national plan should enable the implementation of geospatial infrastructure in Senegal with a strategic approach that is based on the sharing of information and which can improve the development of the territory, because this is a process and everything is connected. So to carry out this process, we need a framework, and that is involved in GCCC and in other land data products, so to Senegal, with many partners, and some other projects as well. And that should enable the development of many different projects based on this sharing of information. So more than the actual data, it is important to share information in all sectors of our activities. And Karim said earlier that there is a lack of sharing. There is some accessibility. There is a link on the Anart website actually, which leads to Geoportal, where there is a sharing of data produced by this institution as to decision makers. The state is the first user of data, because adequate information sharing allows for land prospects and even social planning. Decentralization has meant that certain collectives have to take responsibility for territorial management and space management. This would enable decent land governance. These data are necessary for the first territorial planning. So today what we need to do is to create common paths for the development of this information, as well as departmental knowledge sharing that should benefit these territorial collectives. It would also improve land governance. The private sector, civil society, researchers, universities, are also stakeholders which will benefit from the opening of land data. So how can we contextualize this to see how each stakeholder can access and benefit from this data, from this information, and which will be the sharing system and which will be the format for data sharing. That is what I can respond. Thank you, Mu. It seems like all stakeholders are interested in land data. We're talking about civil society, researchers, the private sector, universities, governments, etc. But as you know, regardless of who the stakeholders are, the problem remains the taxing of information. So that's a general point that has been emphasized. But generally, I see a series of points that we must assess. We have a series of questions coming up that address some of you directly. I'm going to turn to Charles again. Charles, when it comes to sharing land information in Senegal and its evolution and progress, sometimes we see announcements, mechanisms, structures, platforms which are put into place or which should be put in place. Which ones would be of interest for open land data? What can Senegal do to open up more land data and information for governments and civil society? Charles, thank you very much, Kader. I think Omo referred to an important point just before this. She said that the sharing of data and information is a process. I want to emphasize that because it sounds simplistic, but I think that is what Senegal needs to continue to do, to continue on this journey, to continue with this process. And I'm just going to very briefly highlight some key issues that are important for going forward. One, it's to utilize the existing open data capacity in Senegal that exists within ANSD and are not. It is there. And I think that that is a very good starting point, a very good foundation. The second aspect is not to collect more data, that is of course important, but to improve the openness of the data that has already been collected. And I think Lavali also emphasized that there is already quite a lot of data that can be made more available, that can be made more open. A third point would be about improving the availability of spatial data and not only statistical data, and that means releasing some of the data that is contained in these development plans in GIS-ready formats. Another aspect is to improve the metadata of existing data and also to harness existing initiatives that relate to land titling, to agricultural reform in Senegal to introduce the discussion on open data and making that data in these initiatives available and public as part of the thinking right from the beginning. And then of course something that Senegal is already working on is continuing to refine its policy and legislative framework. There is a Data Privacy Act or Data Protection Act. There is work being done on an open access law and I think these initiatives need to continue. And then finally, and I think there was a workshop in Senegal towards the end of last year as well and I will emphasize this again, come up with an open data roadmap scheduled and plan out in a very concrete fashion some key steps that can be achieved going forward. And I think Anat would be a good organization for example to lead such an activity. Identify some categories of data that can be made open and work along identifying some gaps, some challenges, some best practices, some standards and continue on I think a very good journey that Senegal has already started. I'll leave you with that, Khadir. Thank you, Shari. Thanks a lot, Shari. So there are existing structures like the Anat as well as the Anat, the NSD, National Statistical Agencies. So mechanism existing. So now we are in a formulation and in a phase to have all of this data open widely for public. So I think we are on time. Okay, now Abdul Karim regarding the Lambda data and attribution. Where do you see realize progress to make Lambda data more accessible? Thank you, Khadir for this question. Like you see for National Observatory of the Butcheries, state of Senegal has met with a certain number of missions. The first was to be a decision-making tool but also a collect and spreading and sharing to show you all data. So there was a rotation law, the law 21.4 acts of rule. This brings and shows the interest of state of Senegal to these subjects. So there was an act from presidents on it. So the first mission is to follow the territorial change, making more easy the sharing of data for every stakeholder. So like you know, like Mr. Abdi to set it, the difficulty today is when those data are mine, how can there be more spread and more accessible? So there were some regional committees of piloting in different regions of Senegal to bring those data from government parts to other people. So those committees who will be governed by will be ruled by governors and for cadastral people, members were not and for the state of Senegal. So there are some initiatives we are going on. And so it was planned to have a land committee and there were some and so the objective of INET is to focus on land. And it was to focus on land politics. So that's for today, but Jewish cad and that's it for Senegal. Thanks a lot. Thanks a lot to everyone. I see that observatory will make a national collect for data. So what I remember is not only for collecting, it's also for data spreading. So it will be here for the accessibility of data. Thanks a lot, Karim. I'm back to Nati. Nati, are you here? Yes, here I am. Nati. So at the beginning of the movement of opening of data, how does data contribute or how this movement can contribute the equity in land data? And that's part of the return of data in Senegal. So what do you think about it, Nati? Thank you very much for that question. You cannot change what you don't know. So having land data can help make informed decisions that change the reality into a more equal one. Open data can help promote informed participations of citizens and better understand the challenges that they are facing. Open data is also critical to promote accountability so that citizens can actually understand what governments are doing and the public policies that are being implemented in this regard. But to actually unlock public value of governmental data, capacity building and data literacy are going to be critical to actually work on equity so that everyone can actually use and understand the data that is being published and is not left out to technicians to be able to reuse that data. Data reuse is a critical moment of the life of data. So understanding the demand, once again I'm going to repeat it over and over again, but understanding the demand of data is critical. And then I just wanted to connect this process, as Tommy said, like the steps forward. I wanted to connect this process forward for Senegal, which I know there's a lot of things to do. Unfortunately, everybody here is moving forward with that agenda is to better connect this process with the OGP process so that it can be a real participatory process of co-creation between government and civil society organizations and an international commitment on moving forward this agenda together, also connecting data creation with data reuse and actually promoting the enhancement of the open data community in Senegal. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Nati. I think that's clear. Equity is important. Land data needs to be made much clearer in order for us to have a much more encouraging context to work in. Labali. Labali, naturally, as a defender of open data, who can benefit from land information and how can we improve the ecosystem of land data? Because this is essential in terms of making this information accessible. I think that this panel today is actually a good starting point for solutions. These kind of conversations are crucial in order to spread awareness about the importance of land data because often people aren't ready to share data out of ignorance. But if we do things intelligently, we can create mechanisms and tools that allow the exchange and sharing of data. This exchange today and research is happening, but often people keep their data. We forget that we're not going to become richer by keeping our data for ourselves, but that we actually enrich everyone by sharing. I think that today the sharing of land data and open data will allow a set of stakeholders to make progress through reliable data because public data is not accurate. We shouldn't decide about a territory unless we have very accurate data. We're talking about very general data. This kind of data won't help us to make decisions. We need to create a very accurate level. That's why open data will allow stakeholders, researchers, civil society to improve. But I also want to talk about the private sector because State Department publishes data at a certain level. But more and more we see the emergence of private structures who are producing data quite frequently at a different level. Open data does not necessarily mean data created by public services. We are talking about different types of stakeholders who are producing data. We're talking about data producers with quite limited restrictions and rights. That's why when I talk about land information, all the data that was created about COVID, what did we do with this? At one point it was enough for researchers to have access to this data in order to be able to make progress faster. So we need to learn to do the same thing in different projects that have a common thread. We are not capitalizing what has been done. Everyone uses their own data and keeps it a secret, forgetting that sharing is enriching ourselves. Sharing is helping to make decisions. Sharing is giving the other the opportunity to create something that you are not able to create. So this is about communication, about sharing, about showing people that data is the objective. Information is available. But in order to create data we need information. So we need to help our states to create reliable data. For me, research today comes from civil society, the private sector and the state together. We need to continue to spread awareness and to show the relevance of open data. Today many countries are working on this issue, particularly because data is already available but they're not shared. Everyone collects data based on the standard that that particular person likes. It is essential for me, for any project, especially a territorial project, to talk about land data. So there needs to be awareness spreading in Senegal, in civil society, that will benefit everyone. It will lead us to produce this kind of data and to be more open about it. Thank you. Thank you very much, Doctor. I think there are two very important points that you just made. One about information being available and the other is about is that when we share, we enrich ourselves, we become wealthier. Those are two lessons learned from your speech. If information is not shared, we waste time, we have agencies doing the same thing, doubling down on, doubling over on work that has already been done and in the end this data isn't actually available. So we're going to begin the third round with Umu. Earlier we spoke about the question of who should open data work for. So I'm going to start with Umu. How can open data contribute to the situation in Senegal? To the alleviation of land governance in Senegal? So we're talking about accessibility to data. Umu, you have the floor. Hi Umu, sorry to interrupt here. I just quickly want to say I've been informed by the technical support group that we should restrict our answers to a one and a half minute final statement because we only have 10 minutes left. So just to let you know about that, please. Thank you. Thank you. So I'll be really quick. Go on. So really quickly to answer the question of opening data. Let this is a great shared for a small scale. Also for governance, land governance, territorial governance, a good social strategic planification, a security for investment, productive investment. So that brings those investments, a better knowledge of the land, and let a better current in the space and super position of rights will be avoided. And thanks a lot, Kader. Kader, your mic is close. Okay. Thank you, Umu. I said it was synthetic and clear enough. I will avoid the synthesis because the time is flying. Abdul, what's the importance of open land data for investment in the land sector and how that answers this objective? Thanks a lot, Kader. So the sharing of land data is now really important and crucial for the politics, like in elaborations of strategy. We need those data and also at the end of the process, a consideration we need that has need to be collected before and after. So like with good land, territorial politics will have good observations and that allows us to have good sharing of data. It will let us be aware of the impact of politics on also on demography. So it will allow us to take better decisions. However, we need to fix more rules on investment, realizations of those goals. It will allow us all our actors, stakeholders like investors or strategy people to have a better access on land data. Thanks a lot. Thanks a lot, Abdul. So on what said Abdul, what was said is sharing. So like sharing is getting richer. So to share is really important for land governance. Keeping in mind those responses, how do you see open data serving researcher and question on society and bringing options for international issues. Thanks a lot, Kader. We're all okay saying that research is determined for our country. It brings a lot of knowledge. It's moving forward. It also let us have innovations and the fact that research is aware of those data can let the others more and better evaluate it. A simple example. So it's fruit with collaboration with research. We can have tools who take into account local realities. Nowadays, that's what we still need. Research is permanent. So research goes even for both projects. And so for public data, it's important to take into account that land data people are working with researchers to overcapitalization of that as and what we deal with it for local governments and public politics research. That was one of the biggest mistakes was to disconnect research from the local projects because research is like one of the most important parts of the process. That's it, Kader. Thanks a lot. Yeah, I totally agree. We have to let it at the center of. So what I see is like in these issues, there are some research institutes so it's more and more like it. So it's implemented more and more. So Nati, I see that Odyssey emphasized which opportunity you see how countries, depositories of data can think to exploit those opportunities. Thank you very much. I know we have just a couple of minutes, so I'm going to be super brief. I think it is very important to understand the public problem that we're trying to tackle with opening up the data. As we already know from the open data community that the idea that publish and then they will come like the data users will come has already been proven wrong. They won't come if the demand of the data is not being met. But also it's very important to understand that open data policies also mean working on cultural change within government and within citizens because it's to understand that the data that is being created by government actually belongs to the citizens and so cultural change can take time and that's why data literacy is very important. The work that has already been done in the implementation of the open up guide is a very important first step towards a great direction and I'm really looking forward towards the future of the Senegal land portal policy. Okay Nati, okay, okay, merci beaucoup. Merci beaucoup. Thanks a lot, thanks a lot. So you emphasize this important point we already saw that regarding this data and collecting such is and because everyone is looking for the data but it's already found so it's about pertinence of sharing. So some percentage of the country's and the public implementation and meanwhile some think that open data can be a problem how to bring together those propositions that normally seem not the same. Hello Sean. Thank you very much. I think seeing as we have just got about 30 seconds left what I can say is that a lot of the data is not personal data intensive and the problems of privacy it's not an open data problem it's a data management problem it's a data governance problem but I think Senegal through also this process and all the initiatives that we have seen in Senegal is well on its way to this process that Nati referred to which is about trust. I call it creating trust, trust between government and citizens trust about how data is used and I think opening up data is a process and it's a process and a conversation that is designed to generate trust, trust in the data and trust in how it is used and I think looking at what we have done here today we are well on the way I think in that process and I actually look forward to continuing this level of engagement and this level of stakeholders and webinar participation and engaging because I think that is really the right track and so I see a lot of opportunities in front in front of us here. Thanks a lot Charles. The access data problem is not only Senegalese but it's worldwide. It's a big problem. I can't see if we were between government and people. So now to conclude it was constated that you will see just few of land that I was were public. That's an open question for the different panelists. If somebody wants to answer please take the floor because I think one interesting point is mutualization and synergy among stakeholders. There was a legal case led by GICC but it is necessary to have a legal process that contextualizes the whole situation about spread and stocking of data. That would allow enable the definition of the geographic conditions the respect of authors so that would allow mutualization and synergy among stakeholders and users of data. Thank you. Thank you Kadir. Thank you very much Umu. Okay La Balie, Charles, Abdul. If you have anything to add before I move on to the different questions that we have planned. Well Kadir I don't know if you're reading the messages but they're saying we should stop and just thank everyone for coming first because we're over time. Just have to have a look at the messages. Yeah yeah absolutely absolutely thank you Kadir because we were supposed to finish at half past two now it's half 34 past so what we're going to do is we're going to put all this content in the report and the same for the questions so I'm sure we'll have the opportunity to respond to these different questions that are being asked. Thank you very much. I see that there was a huge amount of diversity of stakeholders, participants, I saw technical people, land experts, researchers, academics, public administration etc so thank you to all participants particularly our panelists and the technical team that dedicated part of their time to organizing this webinar. So once again thank you and see you next time bye.


Hi there, YouTube family. I could not be more excited to be bringing you this video of dupes, but it is with one of my favorite YouTubers, Everyday Heidi. If you guys don't know who Heidi is, I can't wait to introduce you to her. I love this girl.  She is a makeup lover like me. She does her makeup so flawlessly, and she has the best videos. She doesn't go overboard on her videos. I mean, she doesn't make super long videos, which I love. The other thing that I love is that she always gives the best recommendations. She loves drugstore like I do. She loves to do dupes like I do, and she's just down to earth, but she is gorgeous. You guys, her skin is absolutely beautiful. She has these big, beautiful brown eyes.  She works with color. She loves color like I do. We have a lot in common except for she's probably like 30 years younger than I am, but she is so fun. And I couldn't wait to do this video with her. She reached out to me actually because she is the one that originally thought up the cheaper and better videos, so I'm happy to be bringing you cheaper and better by Everyday Heidi and Mrs. Melissa M. We are doing this video together. So please go over, tell her that I sent you her link to her channel, and her video will be right below. So please do that because this girl deserves so many more subscribers than she has. And I see big things in her future because she's just, she's all that cheaper and better is the thought process behind the dupes videos. So we're going to get into these. Hopefully you will enjoy them. They are really, really close this time, you guys, and I got some really good ones. So we decided to do five. I'm going to bring you five. Here we go.  And that was the case with the Maybelline Loose Fit Me Powder and the Laura Mercier. This is just her translucent powder. You guys, the Maybelline Fit Me has a ton more in it. And yes, the Maybelline Fit Me does come in different colors. I have mine in light, but these two powders, this is the Fit Me first. These two powders are so luxurious. And if you've ever used the Laura Mercier, you know what I'm talking about. Finally milled. It feels so nice on the skin. It's just a beautiful powder, but that's exactly the way the Maybelline one feels too. So I can put these both on and I'm telling you, I can't tell the difference. Once you buff them into your skin, the Maybelline is every bit as good a powder as the Laura Mercier. And I am so glad that I found this because, you know, this is a mini of the Laura Mercier. That's all I've ever had or been able to forward, da-da-da. But this is, I think, $23 and this one is $8. So get yourself some Fit Me Loose Setting Powder because, and it comes in different shades. So that's the cool thing about it. So you're going to get just a teeny, tiny bit more coverage from it and that blurring property and all the good stuff about setting your makeup.  But it's a great one for like in the summertime when you're sweating. You need to have that makeup to last all day. So good, you guys. Blurring effects, so good. And I have looked and looked and looked, you guys, forever for a dupe for the Mark Jacobs Omega Bronzer because this puppy is so dang expensive. This bronzer is beautiful. It's a beautiful bronzer. It is not too warm. It's not too cool. It has the most perfect, perfect balance between those two. And it does have that coconut smell. It is infused with that coconut smell. And I'm going to build this up so you can see it a little bit better. So that one right there is the Mark Jacobs one. Then, all of a sudden, here comes Milani with their silky matte powders, their bronzers. And you guys, this is a dead on dupe for it, I think. Number two is in Sun Kisses, or I'm sorry, Sun Kissed. And you guys, this is every bit as night. It has that same smell that the Mark Jacobs one does. So they've done the coconut smell on there, too. Now, I will say that this one is a tiny bit more on the cool side. But you guys, you blend that into your skin. And I'm telling you, you can barely tell the difference. I use one on one side, the other on the other side. It is so close. I know that this Mark Jacobs one would last me forever. But if you can't go out and spend, I think that's $54. If I'm wrong, you'll see it up here. But if you can't go out and spend that, try this from Milani. It is silky. It doesn't have any glow in it, like the Mark Jacobs one doesn't. But it does have that silky feel to it. It is long-wearing. It's gorgeous, just absolutely gorgeous. So I wanted to bring that to you for sure this time. I also wanted to bring you a couple of lippies. I'm really excited about these. Because this time, again, this is one where I was just swatching lipsticks across my hand thinking, do I want to keep these or not? And I came across these to you guys really happy about this. OK, so the first one is Snob from Mac. I love Mac's lipsticks. This one, I think, is either a satin formula. Yes, it's a satin formula. I love Mac's lipsticks. And Snob is just right up my alley. This is more on the blue side of a pink. And I just, I really love it, you guys. But Blushing Pout, number 682 from Maybelline. This one is a Mac. So it's not the same finish, although when I look at it on here and the lasting power and everything, it works the same exact. You guys, this is the Maybelline. This is the Mac. Unbelievable. I mean, we're talking if there is any sort of a variance there, it is so minute. And I'm not kidding as far as their opacity. I actually think that the Maybelline, because it's matte, might be a little bit more vibrant than the Mac, which I really do like. But I love them both. They're so pretty, aren't they, you guys? And I'm not kidding. There might be a variance in the hue of just a minuscule amount. But wow, I love it. I absolutely love it. And I love that I found a dupe for it. I absolutely love that, too. All right, you guys. Next, I have Anastasia Beverly Hills Lip Gloss. This is such a great formula, you guys. I love it because it's opaque. I have it on today. I love it because it's opaque. I love it because the color will pop on it. Now, not all of her lip glosses are like that, but this particular one is. And this one is in Dusty Lila. I just think it is so gorgeous, saturated, beautiful. Yes, it probably looks like the lip gloss form of these over here. But I love it. And I love the formula on it. I love that it has a little bit more lasting power than other lip glosses do. It's not a super thin formula, but it's not a sticky formula either. And I absolutely love that. So guess who came out with the dupe? It is Wet and Wild. This was last year. They released their, I think it's last year. They released their Rebel Rose collection. And this is called Pretty Poison. And you guys, we're talking pretty darn close. Now, I will tell you that this had quickly become one of my very, very favorite formulas. Now, you can tell that right here, it looks just a little bit darker, but get that on your lips and you can't tell a difference. I am not kidding. I put this, one of them on my bottom lip this morning and one of them on my top. And I couldn't even tell the difference. And it is such a good dupe as far as the formula goes. It's lasting power, how it's not sticky, but it's not too thin that it's gonna come off.  I love these, you guys. They're really, really good. And finding this color that is a soft pinky purple, I absolutely love that too. Okay, the last one came about because when I was doing a video for you guys, I was comparing all of the powders that are on the market right now that claim to be radiant or glowing. And I didn't put the Hourglass Ambient Light powders in there. This one is called Luminous Light. I didn't put them in there because they're more expensive. It was more of a drugstore overview. I'll make sure I link that one below for you too. But these powders really are very good quality. Lots of people love setting their under eyes for them because they give just a little bit of a light without being sparkly, without having shimmer, anything like that. They just seem to illuminate. And you get the right color for you, whether you're dark or lighter. And it just seems to be like glowing magic on your skin without having shine or anything like that. They really are beautiful powders. And I have this small one. And I also have the palette that I bought last year. And I like all the colors. But in that video, because they were out of stock at that moment, I hadn't even talked about the Milani Prep Set and Glow Powder. But this one, I'm about to hit pan on this one, you guys. This is such a great dupe for the Hourglass powders because it has that same little tiny bit of luminosity. It's not a glow. You can't really say that it's a glow. And yet it's not just a flat matte powder either. It's somewhere in the beauty of the middle of those two. And it is just fantastic. The creaminess, that feel of it, it's just so, so good. So that is my last recommendation to you guys. If you can't afford this, these are so expensive. These powders are very, very expensive. But if you can't afford it, you're gonna find a really good dupe in the Milani Prep Set and Glow. And yes, Milani still is making this. I was glad that they are. I just, they were out at the time and I thought, why do they always just continue the things that I love the best. And many of you said that you already love this for a glowing powder in that video. So I was glad that I tried the two out up against each other and found out that, honestly, you guys, there really is not a lot of different, but these have colors, you know, different colors. And this one has only one color. But I actually love this one a little bit more because of the price point, obviously. And I don't feel guilty about reordering one that costs like $10, this compared to one that costs like $30 some dollars to get one. So that is everything for today's dupes. You guys, cheaper and better at the drugstore. Things that I find at the drugstore that I go ahead and I buy over high-end because I don't feel a bit bad about buying it because the price point is great. And the quality is every bit is good. I love bringing you these videos. I love the concept that Heidi came up with. Please go over and show her some love. Tell her where you came from. Tell her that you came from our family and that you are over to visit her. And don't forget to subscribe and just show her some love. She's a great gal, you guys. I mean it, you'll really fall in love with her. She really is a fun YouTuber. Thanks guys so much for watching today. Hope you're all in good health. I will see you all in my next video. Much love from me to you. Take care of yourselves. Bye-bye.