Hello everybody, welcome back to another AI video, and this one is going to show you how to swap faces inside mid-journey, but we're going to swap a face into an image with multiple faces in it, where multiple people in it. Let me show you what it looks like, and then I'm going to show you step by step how to do it. Here's the original image. I just downloaded this for free off of pixels. It's just a lady looking at the camera, and she's got a neutral expression, and you can see all of her face. So that's why I chose that image. Now, here's the second image, and this one has clearly four people in the shot. Now, I swapped in her face on all of them, and you'll see here that you'll see the, when I go from one to one, so here, and I go quickly, you'll see that all the images are swapped, all four of them, and then in the final one here, I was like, hey, I just want to swap out this girl on the bottom right face, and I want all of them to remain the same. So watch this, click on it, first, second, and third images are the same. The fourth one has swapped out. Now, let me show you how to set it up, and then I'm going to show you how to do it. It should take only a couple minutes. All right, welcome back. So the first step is we have to create our own server on Discord. On the left side here, you'll see this little plus sign, click on that, and you'll be able to add a server. Then it asks you to create your own server, click on that, and then it says for me and my family, or me and my friends, or for a club or a community. It's for me and all my friends. I don't have any friends, but if I did, eh, whatever, we're going to call this face swap multi, whatever, something like that. So I know what it is. So this is multiple face swapping, click on create. When I do that, you'll see up here at the top right, I've got my own server. Beautiful. Let's keep rolling on the left side. You're somewhere over here, you're going to see the sailboat, and that is the mid journey. You want to click on the mid journey bot there, or the mid journey server. Left click on that, and you'll load up all of this stuff here. Don't worry about any of that stuff. Go to the right side, and you're going to see mid journey bot. Left click on that, click right here on top of the bot, and then it says add to server. Go ahead and click on add to server, and then it's going to ask you what server you want to add it to. I'm going to go ahead and add it to whatever the one I just made was called face swap multi. Click on continue. I'm going to go ahead and authorize it to do all those things. Why not? I trust it. And then I'm going to hopefully pass the capture. I think I'm human. Oh man, which one has a crab? I've never had crabs before. Okay, anyway. Yeah, too much info. I'm going to click on verify human. Okay, authorized. Good stuff. Let's go back to that server and let's see where we're at. Okay, so we're in face swap multi. Mid journey bot has been added. Now we need to add in the next bot, which is the insight face swap. This is the one that makes it all possible. So I'm going to get the link. I'm going to paste it in. I'm going to show you how to do it. All right, welcome back. So I just went and grabbed the link. Here it is. You just have to click on this link. I am going to put a link to this in the description below so you can just copy and paste it and you don't have to go digging around for it. So here we go. I'm going to left click on it and watch this. It says an external application insight face. Just go ahead and click on continue. But before you do that, of course, you have to pick the server. So we're going to do what we did in the last one face swap multi. Hit continue, hit authorize and hit I am human. Okay, I'm human. Let's go. No crabs. All right, I don't have crabs. Beauty. Okay, so now at the top right here, if we click in the face swap multi, we've got the insight face bot and we've got the mid journey bot. Now I need to show you how to create IDs and then swap them in. All right. So the first thing I'm going to do is I'm going to just drag and drop in the image that we want to use for this. This is not a required step, but I want to show you what we're working with so you can see the difference. So I'm just going to go to my desktop here. I'm in my finder and I'm just going to drag and drop in this image of Karen. She I made a video about her earlier. She's got an AI virtual chat girlfriend or something like that. So this is the image that we're going to be using. Now we're going to go ahead and create an ID for Karen. Yes, she wants to speak to your manager. Let's create that ID to get this going forward slash save ID. This is a new command that's been enabled by using inf insight face swap. When you do that, hit enter, you get two options. You can drag and drop or click to drag and drop image on top of that. And then you can also give it a name. So I'm going to go back into my finder or if you're on a PC, your windows explorer, and I'm going to drag that image right here. So that is the image. And then I'm just going to call this Karen. C A R Y N. And then I'm going to hit enter. When I do that, notice that the C was capitalized. So it is case sensitive. Just keep that in mind. So here it is. It says ID name Karen created. Now let's get to swapping. All right, everybody, welcome back. So now it's swapping season. So in the last one, we forward slash save ID, and we create an ID named Karen. Now we're going to go forward slash swap ID. But before I do that, I'm going to click on my finder and I'm going to drag and drop the image in so I can show you what it looks like again before I start hitting buttons and swapping out faces. So here's the original image. So here we go. And it's got these four people, all different images, even the bottom left here has a different angle to his face, all attractive, etc. Now let's go ahead and swap in an ID.  This is another new function or new feature that's specific to insight face swap. Hit enter. When you do that, it's going to ask you to drag an image in. And it's also going to ask you for an ID name. Let's go ahead and do that. So I'm going to go to my finder and I'm going to use that same image so I can show you the difference here. So I'm going to drag and drop it there. And then under ID name, we're going to use the ID that we just created called Karen. C-A-R-Y-N. When I hit enter, it's going to swap out, but it's going to swap out all four faces. Now in some cases, that's probably something you might want. If you're doing, for example, an art piece and you want to show everybody looks the same or something, there you go. This is one way to do it. But I'm now going to show you. Well, let's look at it first. Here's the original shot. And now let's look at the revised. You'll see that her face has changed. His face has changed a lot. His face changed a whole lot and her face changed too. So okay, quite a bit there, but let's work with the bottom right one. So again, for some cases, you want to switch out all the faces. But now I'm going to show you how to use it so that you only swap out one face. Excellent. So just make sure that you've saved both of these images and you can just right click on the image, save image as. Now I'm going to go to my finder and you'll see here that I have one.jpg and then I've got new one.jpg, which is the one with all of the faces and the new swapped faces on it. So now I'm going to go to my browser. In this case, I'm going to go to Google Chrome and I'm going to go to a website called Photopea or Photopea. I'm not sure how to pronounce that. What you need to do now is you need to go to your finder or your explorer and grab the first image. So in this case, it's called one.jpg. I was going to drag it and drop it right on top here. I didn't log into anything. It supports itself through ads and there we go. That's our first step. The second step is you want to grab the new image that we just made. And in this case, it's called new one.jpg. I'm just going to drag and drop it and drop it right on top of it. Now, obviously it's not the same size. So just for speed sake, I'm just going to go ahead and increase the size. If you were to do this slowly, you may want to decrease the size of the bottom image, but I'm just going to do this quickly to show you the technique. So if now we look at it, we've got our background image and we've got our regular image. So here's the new image.  So what we want to do now is we want to basically keep one of these faces or whatever number of faces you want and then get rid of the others. So it's very easy to do. The first step is you want to hold down the alt key on a PC, option key on a Mac. Very important. Alt key or option key.  Now add raster mask. When you do that, you'll see it created a black mask. That's very, very specific. You can do the same thing inside Photoshop, the exact same steps. I'm using photopea because it's a free tool and not everybody has a copy or a recent copy of Photoshop. Okay. So with that step, now all you got to do is go to the left side here and you're going to see a few tools. The one we want is this brush tool right here. You can just press B or you can just click on it. And now let's just go ahead and change the size of the brush. So up here at the top left, you'll see here this little thing here. It says brush size. I'm going to go ahead and increase it to 1000 because I just want to do this quickly.  Now what I'm going to do is I'm going to go ahead and start painting on or over the faces. So again, you'll see here that the color is selected to white, which we want. The mask is black and all you got to do is this. Watch this. Look at that. I have changed her face. Let's change this guy's face. That's it. And again, this is a free tool and this is the technique. Whoa, Nelly. So there you go, guys. That's all it takes. Thanks for watching. Time for stuff coming up.


Hey, marketing your company right now is uber important, it's of the utmost importance. I'm going to go in here and show you something that we do, we do a ton of marketing in general, whether it be leads, whether it be training, whether it be helping you blow up your brand, your business. There's a lot of things that we focus on that are all about, that are all about helping agents and driving traffic. If you have a business, you've got to be blown up your business. I mean, we're on the phone. The phones are going off like crazy. We're all on the phone nonstop because we help, don't tell anybody, we help like 1200, 1500 agents a month with insurance leads.  I didn't even, we didn't even help people with insurance leads 18 months ago. And now we've got a massive company to where we're always all on the phone constantly. We run out of, we're like running into other offices, the break room taking calls.  You want a free strategy session with these guys? Call in and say, hey, Cody said, if I called in<PHONE_NUMBER>, that you would give me a free strategy session on how to help my business or a free script. Cody said, hey, if I called in, you would give me his elite 2018 killer script that we sell on the website for free as well. Whatever you want, we're here to help.  Or say that maybe you want to, maybe you're on a mission to help a lot of people, but you, but you want to schedule a actual consultation session with me.  And you want to spend an hour with me diving into the numbers of how to take you from, hey, I'm this guy making 60K. Dude, how do I make 600K next year? I'll give you specific steps and we will walk specifically from, hey, I'm the dude. I'm making 60K. I want to make 600K. What are the steps? And how do I do that? Will you get to talk to me for a few minutes? We get to spend an hour together diving into your business and the numbers? Dude, I'll take you from 60K to 600K to 6 million freaking dollars. That's how we roll because we think big. But the first thing is your marketing's got to be on point. You got to be doing content daily. Content is king. You've got to have a team that is behind you where everyone's on the same mission, where the phones are ringing, to where you're blowing up your brand, whatever you want, we're here. But at the end of the day, it is all about marketing. So call in, say, hey, maybe you want a free strategy session with one of our consultants. Dude, those people, they were all on the phone. They'll help you too.<PHONE_NUMBER>, 833-40 Agent. Say you want a free script. Dude, call and we'll give you a free script. Say you want to learn how to close our leads. Call in. We'll help you with that. Say you want to schedule a one-hour consultation with me on how to blow up your business. Then we're here to help with that as well. Any way we can help, that's where we're here. We're on a mission to help agents. We're on a mission to change the face of this industry and we're on a mission to help you.


As some of you may have seen, I got the Stringer version 2.0 release done yesterday and everything uploaded, so yeah, that's a huge relief on my part. I've been working on that literally just that for like a month straight. And I'm glad to be done that and move on to something else. I have some stuff planned for the future with that, some stuff for a V2.1 and 2.2 release, but I'm going to give myself something else to do for a little bit before working on those features. I had mentioned in a previous video when talking about this and what my plans after getting this done, like what I'm using Stringer for, the pattern engine more than anything else, but the thing is a whole using it for other stuff. And one of these is a project called Langley, which is just another punny name for a grammar DSL, kind of like what you see with Antler or Yak or Bison, those various parser generators. And the idea is largely the same to provide that, but in an actual like integrated with the run time kind of way, and actually have it integrated entirely with the MS build system because there are hooks that they provide that you can do that. And any of you who have worked with any of those parser generators know what I'm talking about. The workflow gets a little weird because you have to build things separately and it's just, it's clunky. It's not like this project exists just for that point. Like I actually want to use Stringer as the engine behind it, which is why it's not exactly defined as like a Lexar or a parser or a tokenizer or any of those specific components. It's literally just a back end engine that can be used for that stuff, but it's like for Langley more than anything else. That being said, now that the 2.0 release is done, I will have a example, a tutorial on using it for validation because it still does those things. It just never actually generates a parse tree. And essentially Langley is the sort of domain specific language for defining the grammar and spitting out the parse tree that any .NET stuff can consume. I mentioned where I was going with all this. I had mentioned that some of this actually needs to be written in IL. And I'm not super happy about that, but that's just sort of the reality of it. Part of the reason why I am designing a specific DSL for this stuff is that working with language is not that easy, mostly because the tooling is really bad, not because working with language in and of itself is somehow really complicated. Some of the people who stick purely with theory, like if you learn that stuff in a purely academic environment, they will make it complicated, but that's more of an issue with just how academics approach things. Now it's not super practical. That was another thing. The default parser that Stringer uses isn't necessarily like a PEG grammar or an LRK grammar or anything like that. It's similar to PEG, and it might actually fit PEG quite well. But it was designed purely around, like, let's have actual source code examples, and can I parse the entirety of that? Yeah, it was designed much more practically, not around a specific parsing theory. But I need IL. And the reason for that is that especially in language stuff, you have multiple inheritance problems. You really do need multiple inheritance, and that's sort of a problem, because C-sharp doesn't support that, Visual Basic doesn't support that, and F-sharp doesn't support that. And some people would be quick to be like, oh, but interfaces are how you do multiple inheritance. To be correct, no. Interfaces are how you establish a contract in the interface to that type. It's not actually inheriting, it's implementing. This is an important distinction. With language stuff, you actually have a very serious need to inherit from two different types for semantic purposes. And going off interfaces really doesn't work that well. And while you can do it, you wind up with a very convoluted API where some stuff is inheriting directly from other classes, but then you also have interfaces and for calling certain members that have to be static because of what they are, like the parser for that token. Some of them are found in the class, whereas some of them you have to use the interface, but then you also have to provide a static class that has that in it, and you have to keep track of what's what and just it. The whole thing is immensely easier if you have multiple inheritance. And there's a pattern for properly doing this. You see that Java sort of has this worked out since they introduced. I don't know what they're calling it, but default method implementations for interfaces. C-Sharp has more recently introduced that as well. And there are other languages that implement it fairly well. I can't say C++ implements it particularly well. C++'s approach was important. It certainly led the way in actually doing it. In hindsight, mistakes were made at the time they were doing it the best they knew how. But it is what it is. Some people might be quick to point out that, oh, but C++ has a special managed runtime, and you can do that and no, you can't. It does for the .NET framework, but not for .NET Core. So that's a problem, obviously, since .NET Core is very obviously the way forward. Maybe Microsoft will port that over, but for the time being it's just simply not there. And it would be... Bizarrely, it would actually be easier to write some of this in IL than in C++ because C++ has a lot of funky stuff going on, and I don't need that. I don't need very strict control over how the memory is managed and exactly how pointers work and all that. I literally just need the multiple inheritance and a little something special with exactly how and where methods are defined, but overwhelmingly it's just needing multiple inheritance. Yeah, I don't need all the C++ fuckery, different projects maybe, but not for this. So there is two extensions already out there that exist for working with IL, and both of them have their problems, and I'll cover that. The one I had mentioned was IL Support, and IL Support is... What it tries to do, we figured out, just really isn't going to be maintainable long-term. This is unfortunate. Maybe the guy... Jean-Philippe, I believe it was a while ago, since I last interacted with him, and I'm not good with remembering names, but I think it was Jean-Philippe, but it's Insomniac on GitHub. He's the author. And what IL Support did was intermix the two. So you'd have a, say, like C-sharp project, but the special IL Support C-sharp project would allow you to have IL files in there as well, and it would compile the two together. But it did this through a little bit of trickery, and it seems like going forward, it's just not going to be that maintainable. The other one is IL Proge or something, and I don't remember what the name is for that at all. The issue there is that it doesn't have any syntax highlighting, which is particularly annoying, and as you'd expect then, it also doesn't have any IntelliSense, which IL Support does offer both. Which is good. It also, there are a number of issues, they're aware of them, it's all over the readme. So I got to figure out before I can really move forward. Am I going to basically just hand write and hand compile the, well not hand compile, but make like a build script for doing the IL and then import that into an actual like C-sharp or VB project that does the rest. It works, but that's clunky, and makes it considerably harder for people to contribute to. Also means that I don't have any highlighting for IL nor IntelliSense. The IL Support's approach is ideal, but we've, that thread in the issue that I had brought up that something wasn't quite working. We went very in-depth into trying to find a solution and it's not looking good. Plus, he seems to have other responsibilities and can't contribute much to it, at least based on how many contributions have been happening recently. Although that may also just be because he doesn't himself think that it's very maintainable going forwards. So the other option that I have been considering and it's something I've really got to sort of do anyways, going forward it would be good to familiarize myself with the LSP, the Language Server Protocol. This is because if you implement an analyzer that also can communicate over the LSP, you have an analyzer that can work with basically any tooling that implements the other side of the LSP. That's really important and sort of abstract, but basically if you have in this example an LSP for IL, any editor that supports, that implements the LSP client side, I think it is, can get information from that LSP, from that language server. So things like syntax highlighting. You implement the classifier in that LSP compliant analyzer, Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Eclipse, I think JetBrains, Vim, and Adam, plenty of others just get syntax highlighting. You implement the IntelliSense side of that and all of those and everything else that supports it just gets IntelliSense. That's extremely, extremely useful. So it would be good to familiarize myself with that and obviously since IL isn't a particularly sophisticated language, it's basically just assembly, like it's assembly. It does not have a complex grammar at all. That would be really the ideal sort of project to familiarize myself with the LSP. And then once that's been implemented, it's literally just dealing with the how do you get ILASM and ILDASM for the specific platform that you need to work with. And that's a little bit trickier, but there are ways around that and yeah. So I'm leaning towards implementing that, which is definitely a few months long project. I really prefer it. It just existed. Microsoft, this has been your thing for a while. Why is there no project support? Why is there no editor integration? I get that you don't mean for people to be programming in it, but it has to happen sometimes. Please, why did you not do this? Yeah, it might be worth it. It definitely seems to be worth it to do that. Even if it's just a learning exercise to get familiar with how to write the LSP and how to integrate that with at least a few editors. Yeah. That's really all I got to say for that. You're probably going to be seeing an ILLSP soon-ish. Also, look forward to December 17th of this year, so 2019. I'm part of the F-Sharp Advent this year.  Certain programming communities do an Advent calendar kind of deal centered around the programming language that the community is built around. So, like I said, I got mine in the F-Sharp one, which I know I don't dabble too much with, but I do know some neat stuff about F-Sharp. You'll have to wait to see what the topic is about. Every day, just like you would do with a normal Advent calendar, you get these articles that get published, and the managers of the event make sure that they get spread around pretty well, so there's good visibility. But, yep, mine's the 17th. So, look forward to that. I'll have an announcement on here, obviously, enough, but yeah, I'm happy about that, because it's good recognition. And since we're on that subject anyways, I've actually been talking a little bit with a project manager. I'm not going to say who or what not, but a project manager at Microsoft, because they're quite impressed with the performance I've been getting out of Stringer, and they're sort of talking about whether or not certain things that I did would be applicable to their Regex engine and shit like that. So, really nice to see recognition. This is what I was talking about in previous videos, that a big part of why I'm really not doing added development anymore is because despite doing impressive stuff, I've been met with hostility from them, but welcome recognition from the other side. When these go in tandem for enough years, do you want to contribute to a community that's hostile to you?  Actually really heartwarming to get recognized like that.  Until whatever I don't know what I really got in the video pipeline. I'll try to have that tutorial done soon. The next day or two should be because it's basically implemented. I just got to do the video. Until then, have a good one.


Good afternoon everyone and welcome back to theCUBE where we're coming to you live from Detroit, Michigan at KubeCon and called NativeCon. We're going to keep the KubePuns coming this afternoon because we have the pleasure of being joined by not one but two guests from Kubea, John Furrier, my wonderful co-host. You're familiar with these guys. You just shadowed with them last week. We broke the story of their launch and featured them on theCUBE in our studio and studio conversation. This is a great segment, real innovative company with lofty goals and they're really good ones. Looking forward to this. If that's not a tease to keep watching, I don't know what is. Without further ado on that note, allow me to introduce Amit and Shaqid who are here to tell us all about Kubea and I'm going to blow the pitch for you a little bit just because this gets me excited. They're essentially the Siri of DevOps but that means you can create using voice or chat or any medium. Am I right? Is this, yeah? You're hired. Excellent. We'll take it. We'll take it. Who knows what I'll tell the chat to do or what I will control with my voice but I love what you're saying. Absolutely. I'll just give the high level conversational AI for the world of DevOps. Kind of redefining how self-service DevOps is supposed to be essentially accessed, right? As opposed to just having siloed information, having different platforms that require the operator or somebody who's using it to know exactly how they're accessing what they're doing and so forth, essentially the ability to express your intent in natural language, English or any language I use. It's quite literally a language barrier sometimes, both from the spoken as well as code language and it sounds like you're eliminating that as an obstacle. We're essentially saying turn simple complex tasks into simple conversations. That's really what we're saying. So let's get into the launch. You just launched a fresh startup. You guys are going to take on the world. Lofty goals, I had the briefing. Where's the origination story come from? How did you guys get here? Was it a problem that you saw, you were experiencing, an itch you were scratching? What was the motivation and what's the origination story? So, essentially everything started with my experience as being an operator. I used to be a DevOps engineer for a few years for a large company. On later stages, I even managed an SRE team. So all of these access requests, Q&A stuff is something that I experienced nonstop on Slack or Teams, all of these communication channels and usually I found out that everything happens from the chat. So essentially back then I created a chatbot. I connect this chatbot to the different organizational tools and instead of the developers approaching to me or the team using the on-call channel or directly they will just approach the bot. But essentially the bot was very naive and they still needed to know what they want to do inside the bot. But it still managed to solve 70% of the complexity and the toil on us as a team so we could focus on innovation. So, QBI is a more advanced version of it. Basically with QBI you can define what we call workflows and we convert all of this complexity of access requests into simple conversations that the end users which could be developers but not only are having with a DevOps team. So that's essentially how it works and we're very excited about it. So you were up all night answering the same question over and over again. Is that the point? I need to say, screw it. I'm going to just create a bot, but it gets at something important. I'm just joking, probably happened, right? That was probably the case. You're up all night, tell us. Yeah, I mean, it was usually stuff that we didn't need to maintain. It was trending requests and questions that just keep on repeating themselves and actually we were in Israel but we served three different time zones of developers. So all of these developers as soon as the day finishes in Israel, the day in the US started. So they would approach us from the US. So we didn't really sleep answering these requests. Because that's 24 hours. Yeah, 24 hours for a single team. The old clock goblets, you can catch it a little sometimes. So you basically take all the things that you know that are common and then make a chatbot answer as if you're you. But this brings up the whole question of chatbot utilization. There's been a lot of debate in the AI circles that chatbots really haven't made it. They haven't been good enough. So because of NLP and other trivial things that haven't really clicked. What's different now? How do you guys see your approach? Cracking the code to go that kind of reasoning level. Bots can reason, now we're in business. Yeah, most of the chatbots are general purpose, right? We're coming with a domain expertise. We know the pain from the inside. We know how the operators want to define such conversations that users might have with a virtual assistant. So we combined all of the technical tools that are needed in order to get it going. So we have a DSL domain specific language where the operators can define these easy conversations and combine all of the different organizational tools which can be done using the SDK. Besides this fact, we have a no code for less technical people to create such workflows even with no code interface. And we have a CLI which you could use to leverage the power of the virtual assistant even right from your terminal. So that's how I see the domain expertise coming in that we have different communication channels for everyone that needs to be inside the loop. That's awesome. And I can add to that. So that's one element which is the domain expertise. The other one is really our huge differentiator. The ability to let the end users influence the system itself. Like how? Give an example. Sure, we call it teach me feature. But essentially, if you have any type of a request and the system hasn't created an automation or doesn't recognize it, you can go ahead and bind that into your intent and next time, and you can define the scope for yourself only, for the team, or even for the entire organization that actually has to have permissions and access to requests and controls and so on. Yeah, I love that as a knowledge base. I mean, a custom toolkit. Absolutely. And I like that you just said for the individual. So let's say I have some crazy workflows that I don't need anybody else to know about. I can customize my experience. Do you see yourself, this is really interesting and it's surprising to me, we haven't seen a lot of players in this space before because what you're doing makes a lot of sense to me, especially as someone who is less technical. Do you view yourselves as a gateway tool for more folks to be involved in more complex technology? So I'll take the, it's not that we haven't seen advanced virtual assistants. They've existed in different worlds. Up until now they've existed more in CRM tools, call centers, right? You go on to Robert Ray, Calvin Klein, you go and chat with, now imagine you can bring that into a world of DevTools that has high domain expertise, high technical amplitude, and now you can go and combine the domain expertise with the accessibility of conversational AI. That's a unique feature here. What's the biggest thing that surprised you with the launch so far? The reaction to the name, which is Cube in Hebrew, apparently. Which by the way, we have a TM and R on our cube.  The Cube, the Cube. What's up with the trade marshal today, John, here? We're here to share information. Open source, open source, open source, sorry about that. Where are you slide this time? The CubeCon, the Cube, and Kubea. In the Hebrew we have the saying third time, we all have ice cream. So. I think there's some ice cream over there. There is. All kidding aside, all fun. What's been the reaction? Got some press coverage. We had the launch, you guys launched with the Cube in here. Big reception. What's been the common feedback? And really, I think I expected this, but I didn't expect this much. The fact that people really believe in our thesis. Really expect great things from us, right? We've started to work in with. Rolling out dozens of POCs, but even that requires obviously a lot of attention to the detail, which we're rolling out. This is effectively what we're seeing. People love the fact that you have a unique and fresh way to approach in the self-service, which really has been stalled for a while, and we've recognized that. I think our thesis is what we're doing. So as a startup, you have lofty goals, you have investors now. Congratulations. Thank you. They're going to want to keep the traction going. But as the North Star, what are you going to take? What territory are you going to take? Is it new territory? Are you eating someone's lunch? Who are you going to be competing with? What's the target? What's that? What's that? I'm sure you guys have it. What are you taking over? I think the gateway, the entry point to every organization is a bottleneck. You solve the hard problem first, that's where you can go into other directions and you can imagine where other operational workflows and pains that we can help solve once we have essentially the dev off. This is the green field, new opportunity. I believe so. What do you see out there in old Stodgy? Today we're on an internal developer platform, service catalog type of use cases, but that's kind of where we can grow from there and have the ecosystem essentially embrace us. How about the technology platform? What's the vision for the innovation? Essentially you want to be able to integrate with all of the different cloud providers, cloud solutions, SaaS platforms, and take the headless approach that we're using right to the chat from everywhere to anywhere. So essentially we want in the end that users will be able to do anything that they need inside all of these complicated platforms which some of them are truly complicated with plain English. So what's the biggest challenge for you then on that front leading the technology side of the team? So I would say that the conversational AI part is truly complicated because it requires to extract many types of intentions from different types of users and also integrate with so many tools and solutions. So it requires a lot of thinking, a lot of architecture, but we're doing it just fine. Awesome, what do you guys think about KubeCon this week? What's the top story that you see emerging out of this? Just generally as an industry observer, what's the most important story? Maybe it's them. Announcement halo. Yeah. You see, I mean you guys are in the automation and tent-based infrastructure, I get that. So obviously everyone's looking to diversify their engineering, diversify their platforms to make sure they're as decoupled from the main CSPs as possible. So being able to build their own and we're really helping enable a lot of that in there. We're really helping prove the point that open source together with managed platforms can really play a very nice game together, so. Awesome, so are you guys hiring, recruiting? Tell us about the team DNA and your telly if you're in the bay. Check our openings, or LinkedIn. We have a dozen job postings on our website, obviously engineering and sales, then go to market. So when the cube comes to Tel Aviv and we have a location there. Yeah, it's a sort of telly of office happening right now. We would be hosting you. With the C and the cube with the K over there. All one happy family. We'd love that. Get some ice cream. We'd love that. All right, so last question for y'all. You just had a very big exciting announcement. It's a bit of a coming out party for you. What do you hope to be able to say in a year that you can't currently say right now when you join us on the cube next time? No, no, absolutely. I think our thesis that you can turn conversations into operations, it sounds obvious when you think about it, but it's not trivial when you look into the workflows and to the operations. The fact that we can actually go a year from today and say we got hundreds of customers, happy customers, who've proven the thesis or sharing knowledge between themselves, that would be euphoric for us. All right. You really are about helping people. Absolutely. It doesn't seem like it's just lip service from both of you. No. It's going to be levels of bot, like level one bot, level two, level three, and then finally the SRE gets on the phone. Are we going to reach bot singularity? Is that what we're exploring right now? Like some kind of escalation bot. Levels are the right thing to do with bots. We're actually playing a feature we want to call a handoff where a human in the loop is required, which often is needed. Machine cannot do it alone, we'll just... Yeah, I think it makes total sense for GEOs, ops at the same but not exactly the same. Really good solution. I love the direction. Congratulations on the launch. Thank you so much. Thank you very much. It's exciting. You can obviously check out that news on Silicon Angle since we have the pleasure of breaking it. Absolutely. If people would like to say hi, stalk you on the internet, where's the best place for them to do that? Beyond our Twitter and LinkedIn handles, of course. So we have kubi.ai. And we also have a free trial until the end of the year and we also have free forever tier that people can sign up, play and come say hi. I mean, we'd love to chat. I love it. Well, Mitch, Shaked, thank you so much for being with us. Thank you so much. John, thanks for sitting to my left for the entire day. I sincerely appreciate it. I can help out. And thank you all for tuning in to this wonderful edition of theCUBE, live from Detroit at KubeCon. Who knows what my voice will be controlling next? But either way, I hope you're there to find out.


The number one reason crowdfunding campaigns fail is because of lack of information and guidance. There's an abundance of information online because there's different, several types of crowdfunding. You have equity crowdfunding, and then you have product crowdfunding, and then medical bills, and all these other things. What we do is we focus specifically on artists, and artists' crowdfunding is very, very different than any of the other types of campaigning. When we focus specifically on the creators and we provide them with this coaching, it's a game changer. We're raising, what, four times the amount of the competing, yeah, a lot more.


This study compares the latest cancer profiles, trends, and determinants between China and the United States, USA. The results show that in 2022, there will be approximately 4,820,000 and 2,370,000 new cancer cases, and 3,210,640,000 cancer deaths in China and the USA, respectively.  Age-standardized incidents and mortality rates for lung cancer and colorectal cancer in the USA have decreased significantly recently, but rates of liver cancer have increased slightly. Rates of stomach, liver, and esophageal cancer decreased gradually in China, but rates have increased for colorectal cancer in the whole population, prostate cancer in men, and other seven cancer types in women. Increases in adult population size and population aging were major determinants for incremental cancer deaths, and case fatality rates contributed to reduced cancer deaths in both countries. The study concludes that the decreasing cancer burden in liver, stomach, and esophagus, and increasing burden in lung, colorectum, breast, and prostate, mean that cancer profiles in China and the USA are converging. This article was authored by Chang Fosya, Xu Sidong, Healey, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


What in the wild, wild world of sports is going on?  But I made a shirt change, how about that? And welcome to our new setup. Yeah, we did a whole new setup just for Romance Month. That's it. We're going to do a new setup every month. And I know it's like the 7th or the 8th or whenever we're actually posting this.  For a Roman? Sorry, I was moving. I apologize. And so this is Romance Month. We're going to catch up though. We're going to watch all Romance films having to do with love. Whether it's a rom-com, whether it's stuff like Lunchbox, whether it's whatever, and obviously there's a thousand new films coming out this month as well. Yeah, that's a busy month. All that. But the first film in Romance Month we watched was Barley? Barley Keep Barfy. It's Corbinized. I'll take it. Is it Barley? Barley, how do you say it? Borelli, right? Oh, Borelli? Yeah, Borelli Keep Barfy. Not Barley? Not Barley. It's Barley Keep Barfy. Barley Keep Barfy now. Barley Keep Barfy. Yeah, it's a great soup. The 2017 film directed by Ashwini Ayer Tawari. I hope I pronounced that right. Oh, based off of a novel. Based off of a book. Based off of a book and starring just a couple of people. Just a few people. Nishman Karana, Creedie Sennan. Sennan? Yeah, Creedie Sennan. Rajkumar Raab, Pankaj Tripati, and... Our Dost. Our Dost. And wasn't there... Yes, there was. I have it on my list as well. As well as the narrator was Javed Akhtar. Yes. And there's also quite an extensive resume for... Where is she? Sema. Oh, yes. Sema, the mom. Yeah, yeah. Anyways, but yes, so this will be a 100 minutes spoiler review this Romance Month. So we're watching all films, Love and Romance. Yep. And this one is a comedy romance. Almost basically a rom-com, essentially. But it'll be 100 minutes for a review if you haven't watched it. Go watch it. We also on Netflix. Yep. Watch it and come back. Rick, your initial thoughts, please. Well, this is our ninth film this year, 216th all-time, 134th Hindi. And I have a little paragraph for this film based on the book, The Ingredients of Love. I said, a good romantic comedy looks like it was easy to make when, in fact, they're incredibly hard to pull off. And the bulk of that difficulty falls upon the shoulders of the writers. Thankfully, Beverly Kibarfi is not only a well-written screen play, but a well-crafted movie all the way around. While, at first, I was concerned about one aspect that really strained credulity, and it would change, or that the toxicity of these stereotypical guys was going to make the movie a bittersweet swallow at best. The brilliance of the writing and the strength of the acting made this movie get better and better with each passing minute, and ultimately, especially in the last 30 minutes.  Yeah, I really liked it as well. Yeah. This is insane. And there's, we'll talk about all the aspects of violence. I was probably the same as you. I was really worried for a little while.  How are you going to redeem it? Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And so we'll get into all that. But they, and it's, I think this is probably the most rom-com-rom-com we've seen. I would agree. In terms of like the stereotypical format of a rom-com, this hits all the buttons. You know they're going to get together in the end. Yep. Like, he's going to have some, or he or she is going to have something going wrong. They're going to have to redeem. Right. They're going to have to do all that. Right.  Seriously. So mean. But we'll get into that. But yeah, I agree with you. This is a really, right after it ended, I was like, I enjoyed that. Yeah. That was nice. Exactly.  Exactly. They did a really great job in the last 30 minutes of doing some things that I legitimately was like thinking to myself, how are you going to, I was like, how are you going to pull this off? Yeah. So if you have one to get, if you have a watch, go watch it. Because we're obviously going to get disposed. But yeah, that was my thing too.  Right. Exactly. He literally waterboarded his friend. Right. And we're still going to get less and less of a girl. We're still going to like him at the end and let him know. So what's going to happen here? Right. And so I, me and my wife did kind of figure out what was going to go on. I was still worried a little bit. I was like, now did you predict, because I never know these things and you did, did you guys predict that she knew the whole time? No. No. I figured that he told her. Okay. At some point. When we found out is basically when he was like, the engagement is set and we need you there. Okay. So you knew early on. Yeah. We were like, clearly, clearly we think. I didn't know because it was getting really late into the film. And I was like, we still haven't. Right. That was part of my. What are you going to do here? But it was a really sweet reveal and what they did. Agreed.  He realized. Yeah. That's the thing. They got him to a place where he went, you know what?  Yeah. And we needed that. Like to like, like big time. Yeah. The writing, I think, why it was well done in that aspect is I think he was a guy who never thought of himself cool. Right. But he wanted to portray that he was a cool person. Right. That he's seen in films of young, I'm going to talk Bachchan. Sure. Or villains. Right. Like all those type of villains and he wanted to be that style of person. Of course. Because he thinks that's what girls want. But in real life, he's this sweet guy. So he's like putting on this front. Right. And that's why he's still, I still wouldn't have wrote it this way. But like waterboarding Rajkumar Rao. I was like, I was like, what are you doing? He was, I feel so bad for Rajkumar Rao in this film. I know. So bad. But even he, he at a point, it's like, even though he was the sweet guy that was being manipulated, he too started to get it up. He got it up. Yeah. He figured out why. Exactly. And then it just became about, I'm watching this sweet girl and her sister being played by these douchebags. Yes. I'm like, please don't let this just be a movie about toxic masculinity. Yeah, yeah. Somehow the guy gets the girl on the end. Yeah. Don't just make it easy. And so it's, it was, if you like the romcom genre, I think you'll enjoy this. Love this movie. It's, it's, you, you feel good in the end, even though it takes you a minute to get there. And like, even though, I think the entire film is, I feel good, but you're, you're wondering like, how how are you going to redeem him? And that's the biggest question. And thankfully, while you're thinking that, you're not like so detested by him that you're struggling through the movie. You're enjoying the movie and you like it and it's lighthearted, but you're thinking, okay, if you're going to turn this into a good movie. Wow. And they, I thought that's why I think the writing was brilliant. Writing was wonderful. Brilliant. And I thought all the actors did amazing. I, I chalked it up to, it was like early, like in all their careers, because it sounded dubbed most awesome dubbing. Yeah. Specifically, the ice cream segment was dubbed. And it was like a lot of the actors, it was just, I know it's a thing in some Indian films, budget reasons. Not all of it, but a lot of it. You hear some, like, you could, like, clearly that wasn't on that day. Right. In filming.  I'm not going to hold it against it. Me too. It's kind of that. It's part of what the industry's done. Whatever I just wish they would get away from it. But I thought all the actor, I mean, how could you get away from it? I think Rajkumar, once again, to have Rajkumar and Pankaj in the same film with Ayakwet Rajkumar, a young Pankaj. Yeah. He has this innocent lovable. And Pankaj has this, this, obviously he has an intensity, but he's also has the lovable John Candy-esque feel about it. Yeah, but you know, you probably have the same thought while I'm watching him and I love him in these roles, because this is kind of a similar role to the role he played with her and Mimi. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And if you, if you added some energy and some comedy, it's kind of like how he was in Stree, but they're very different, right? But as I'm watching this, I'm like, okay, this is the guy in Mimi, this is the guy in Ludo, this is the guy in Stree. This is the guy who does this in Merzifer. That weight, that dramatic power. He can just turn that dial all the way down and play just this kind of meek, mild mannered kind of. Yeah. That's amazing. He is, he might be, if you go by like how much an actor can do, he might be the best actor. He's so versatile in Indian cinema. As is Raj Kamaral. Yeah. They're very versatile actors. Versatile actors. Great versatility. But the fact that Pankaj can do, and I know Nawaz, we've only seen a little bit of comedy with Nawaz, and he did a great job in that Salman Conville. Right. He was a party, he was hilarious. And I know he can do it, but the fact that, obviously, Danny DeLewis might be the greatest actor of all time, but I've never seen him do comedy. No. I agree with you. There's a versatility aspect that's very different from other actors. The like with obviously Robin Williams. Right. The fact that you can do so much. Great versatility. Are you technically a better actor if you can do everything so well? Like Meryl Streep. Yes. Versatility. As opposed to just one thing. Right. And so, he's so impressive. I love him so much. Me too. Raj Kamar, I thought did a great job in terms of, and he's always great. He's always, and he has the same, he can be so intense, but he's always this meekness about him. Yeah. And he's so innocent. He's so innocent a lot of the times, but he also, when he flips the switch into being this douche. Yeah. And he does it so well and so naturally. Yeah. He's one of the best parts about the film. Creedie. I think she's, I really hope, I think she's signed on to a film with Anyard Cascio. Really? I think, I think I heard that. That would be wonderful. Because I, again, I enjoyed her in this as much as I did in Mimi. Yeah. I just, I think she's a really wonderful actress. And I'm looking forward to whatever else she's going to be working in, because I just, I, she has a likeability. She has a charisma. She has a great screen presence. She seems to be a pretty well trained actress who's got the believability down. She doesn't do anything with indicating this whole cast. Yeah. I, I enjoyed this film as much as I enjoyed Mimi in terms of the whole cast. The sons. Yeah. The couple in Mimi that. Yeah. Yeah. But yeah, she, I think she did a, a super phenomenal job in, in bringing the level. I thought it was kind of weird in this film how they kind of shifted gears in terms of who was the leading actor. Right. Yeah. Because in the beginning it's her. Yeah. And you're like, this is her story. It's her story. And it switches to a Euchman. Right. And then it almost switches to like it switches a few times. It really does. So that ultimately it kind of becomes the narrator's story. I feel like it's going to be her film. And it's going to be her story. But it really gives you her perspective. It gives you Euchman's perspective. It gives you Raj Kumar's perspective. Yeah. It even gives you a little bit of Pankaj's perspective. Pankaj's perspective. Yeah. And Euchman, as always, he's such a good actor. Such a good actor. He's very versatile as well in terms of he can do a lot of comedy. Yeah. This role doesn't, no, comparatively with Raj Kumar. Obviously Raj Kumar is playing the character role a little more in this one. Exactly. But I think he did, he's always believable. He's one of my favorite actors. The nice thing about this, and it's part of what I meant in the paragraph, when I said it's really hard to pull off a good rom-com. This one's really hard. In script, I would have been, I would have had some concerns about, are we going to be able to pull this one off? And it'd be believable and entertaining.  I'm like, please take us to a place, not just for the moral of the story, but for this character. Yeah. Please bring him to a place of realization he's been a dick, so that he can ultimately be heartbroken and win her in the end. And that's a testament to him, the actor playing the role. And what you want to do in rom-coms, because it's its own genre obviously, and it's a very specific genre. You know the format and people like the format. They like to sit and be like, I'm going to watch this movie, it's going to be fun and it's happy in the end. Yeah. Exactly. That's the genre. And I thought they did a phenomenal job at the end. I did too. And with his great job. With obviously, you know, a lot of people might not have caught what they were going to do. Right. But I loved the way they did it. I did too. The fact that Raj Kumar, I don't know who I was looking at, clearly he's faking that. Right. But then they let him, and I thought he did a phenomenal job delivering that speech. And she did a wonderful job listening. In a chemistry between him and Raj Kumar. She's like, yes. And then he was calling Raj Kumar to come out. And she was like, nope. And I was like, that's a very sweet moment. Very sweet. It's one of those moments you have to have in a rom-com of, like, this is the feel-good moment of the film. Exactly. And the fact that everybody knew and was putting on this thing. Pankaj was like, I just figured out a few days ago. Yeah. But they're so happy that. And I assume we don't have the benefit of being able to tell what was about taking that. But again, one of the challenges not just in rom-com, but it's very difficult to adapt a book to film. Very, very hard, because there's so much you can't include that in the book is imperative to the story. So you have to decide what are you going to leave out and still make it work. Yep. So I, yeah, I thought, and I thought also there's the composers of the score. Oh yeah, the score. Were multiple composers working together as a team. And they did what you need to do. Again, very, very tricky because you need a lot of music to drive the storytelling in rom-coms a lot of the time. Mm-hmm. But the risk is it can be overscored. Yeah.  And I didn't, I never felt that way with the score. I thought the score was really nice. Yeah. I liked the score a lot. I loved all the songs, creedy, with, yeah, we got Pankaj dancing. We did. We got a little, we got a little musical number of him strutting his stuff a little bit. And I loved it. My favorite's like Manoj or Pankaj or Nawaz dancing. I'm very happy because I think they deserve their own attitude. Songs. You know, we talk, we talk also a lot about, you know, all the actors, the directors, the primary figures that are responsible for the bulk of the creative moviemaking. But one of the things we talk about often what it needs to be is the casting and Mukesh Chabrah who does he's the big zillion casting. Great casting. He's also the director of the, the last Sushant film. So he's gone into directing. Oh, I didn't realize that. Yeah. But he is probably the biggest casting director in India. Yeah. And I, it's just one of those moments where I recognize and I put down on my notes who are the key people that I felt were responsible for this being so good. And in addition to who we've already mentioned one of the groups of people who typically doesn't get heralded in reviews are the casting people. Yeah. We've, I think the last casting was the consistency with which we saw Abhishek do his casting. Of course. And there's a consistency with if you see Mukesh Chabrah's name on something you pretty much are guaranteed you're going to have a pretty stellar cast. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. And I also thought the story was really kind of I don't want to say progressive because obviously we're this was 2017. So, but the fact that the dad he wanted what was better for her very true. Obviously the mom was like, I just want you married and I thought the mom did a great job playing that character. She did.  Exactly. That if this isn't an arranged marriage that the guys can just turn you down. Yeah. That conversation with her and Pankaj of why is that this would be different if I was a guy and Pankaj was like this is the society. Yeah. And he said it raised her as a boy which it really wasn't that he raised her as a boy it was just he was more progressive and non-letalistic in things. Oh, and before I forget because I had said there was one thing that kind of strange duality for me. The one element I would have maybe changed and it's just a maybe changed was the fact that Ayushman's writing about her was just happenstance that all of those particularities were so specific that she thought the book was about her and she had a secret admirer was just happenstance I was waiting for the shoe to drop and would have liked to maybe have included the prospect that he really had been and was too terrified to admit it. And then I thought it was more just she doesn't see stories of girls like this in India and so I think that and that's why for me it's it's that it's very very I assumed it was just she doesn't feel like she fits in society and finally somebody wrote a something wrote something about that of a girl in India that kind of fits her but yeah I understand but overall I'm very happy with our first film I was where I was finished I think I me and Steffo said that was nice I enjoyed that film and that's always what you need because you're not going to get like Oscar worthy stuff in wrong but that's what you're looking for you're looking for to have a good or been introduced to Shakespeare like what should I start with Shakespeare I always say go to Romeo and Juliet go to Romeo and Juliet because that's the one that doesn't have the weightiness of all of the other ones it's the more accessible it's not considered I still think it has a lot of artistic merit but that's what you get when you have rom-coms you have a very particular formula and a feel that it's supposed to do but very rarely is it awards it doesn't have to be but let us know what our next film should be it just has to be about love overall it doesn't even have to be a comedy it doesn't have to be a rom-com honestly, if there are more rom-coms like this because I said this is probably the most rom-com-ish rom-com we've seen if there's more of this please let us know because this is we haven't got a lot of this in a new film no, like a star is born would qualify for love and that thing ain't no rom-com technically, Lunchbox would have qualified there's an endless amount of Indian films that I have to do with love love is the theme just let us know what should be dumb, dumb


What's up everybody, Jason here for JaspysCaseBrace.com 2021 Upperdic Goodwin Champions 4 box break, first name, first letter, number 7 just sold out So again, this is a fresh case, 7 and 8 will be a part of this one, guys Remember, everybody gets a random letter from the list below Remember, we're only shipping insert number cards and hits Remember, no base card ship, of course, don't play our exceptions All non-human cards, including maps, coins, animals, vehicles, etc. will be randomized In one lot to one person at the end of the break, even if they're numbered and their relics Still gonna go in one lot, so just so you guys know Here are at least two hits per box, including, but not limited to Autographs, reveal the cards, manufacture patches, relic cards, etc. So, there you go guys, here we go Here's dice, fillers, and customer names, and the letters, let's roll it And we got a 1 and a 6, 7 times, good luck One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven Seven times, Travis down to Steve Burch Seven times, one, two, three, four, five, six, and seven Seven times, seven times, L down to all other letters So Travis, you have L, Peter with K, Michael with the VWZ combo Michael P, that is Peter with R, Michael P with J, Michael Robinson, you have N Travis with C, Bennett with P, as well as A Travis M, that spells Pam Michael P with D, Steve Burch with T, Bennett with S, and Steve Burch with all other letters So, it's alphabetized there And if anybody wants to take a quick look at the end I don't think there will be any trades, but I'll leave it open for like 30 seconds Alright, so we'll have four on the left, four on the right guys One, two, three on the left, four, five, six on the right Oops, sorry, that doesn't count, I'm going to slip it off There we go Five, one, two, three, four, five, six So this will be for the second half, which I'm very confident we'll probably sell this one out too I think these have been selling really well, so I don't see why we wouldn't do more of these tonight But eventually, we are going to sell out though guys, I think we only have like two more master cases left between us and Instagram that are selling them You know, we might sell out pretty quick But remember, we do have these available for personals on Instagram You won't see it on the website, but I think they're like 200 bucks still, you can ask Teddy And you would pay via Balanced O to need for Rip-O-Mesh Personals are shouldn't be too sealed, whatever you guys want So it's not too much of a pricey box The last time I checked it was like 200 or something I might know some places we're selling them for 300 So I don't know if the price has gone up, but I think our price was still the same Somewhere around there So check it out, jaspys.com Swizzit card All the heads right there Alright, so again, those plain cards, the animal cards will be going in one lot to one customer Let's just put this to the side already Isaiah Todd And we got Toby Miller Letter T that is going to Steve Burch And the Jordan, Platinum Legacies Michael, letter M going to Travis Check this out guys, I think I think we have a Swizzit card and yes, it is a Allen Iverson 40 40 out of 99 AI, the answer And that's going to letter A for Allen Ben and Paige 3D, Sky Brown Letter S with that one That's going to Bennett again Jean Montero Letter J that is going to Michael P Wayne Gretzky, letter W It's going to Michael P in the combo spot Next one Second box Bucks 2, Bucks 2 Bayeron, Laura Ooh, look at that, Josh Gitty That's awesome right there Josh Gitty, letter J for Michael P Relic of Isaiah Todd Letter I Part of the All Other Letters spot Jonathan Caminga Another J to 499 Riff Raff The Riff Raff Gaudi Red Alright guys, next box 3 out of 4 Lady Luck Relic The historic Riviera Hotel and Casino was demolished in 2016 It was bought by the Las Vegas Convention and visitors authority This chip features engravings of the Oh, it's a chip, it's a plane chip That's cool, that's actually pretty cool Alright, well everybody will have a shot at that Of course, that's part of the non-human stuff It's very heavy actually The chip that they obtained with this product Right Michael? It's like cool chip, but it's like random No, they do sell well Some of these do really sell well John Taffer Like I said, right off the bat Obviously you know you're getting into it You're gonna have a 1 in 14 shot So depending on some box Some boxes will have a lot of nice stuff like that And some boxes aren't gonna have any of the non-human stuff But that one's really nice And LeBron James Gaudi I don't know if that's a number It looks really cool though I think it's more sleeves really quick 1 in every 1,660 packs So that's probably, well how many packs are in a box? 20 packs? So 5 boxes is 100 packs It's 1 in every 83 boxes Alright LeBron James 2L for Travis Cloak in Letter C, go to Travis And an autograph here of Mike Macias Letter M, go to Travis D Oh that's right Alan are they playing right now? There's one game going on at 430 Do you know what channel is that on? Is that on CBS Sports? Remember the channel they were supposed to be playing on? Oh no it's on Channel 4 I don't know I would hope for multi-seasons I would hope for one of these other NFL Or other competitors Get the opportunity to work with the NFL It looks like to be honest The XFL is already like Kind of partnering up with the NFL with technology So that's a good relationship right there already I know the Alliance Football League Really wanted to become that kind of minor league system team for The NFL and then at the time XFL when it was stolen by Vince McMahon He was just like we're going to just Run the NFL out of business Which was not going to happen Like the Rock and his XY business partner Kind of really want to transform the XFL Into a really competitive league And you know probably be like a minor league team Kind of deal for a lot of these players That may not be able to make the NFL right away But the only option is to go to Canada Or that's it you know They can still play here in the NFL Nice Australia World Map Travelers World Travelers Map Spain? Australia? Has anybody been to Australia? So I would hope the USFL lasts for a little bit But I don't know I think XFL might Be the one to really last longer Yeah it's on channel 4 actually So which is NBC I'll put that game on There's only one game today and then the rest are tomorrow I believe So it's I think New Jersey Generals Battling the Birmingham Stallions I don't know if NFL Europe was a minor league Or not I remember though it was actually pretty cool though But I don't know if it really was I think NFL players did play there though Like you're right I think so Like because it was during the summer right So it's kind of like to get better Just kind of sucks I think all the way to Europe though Another Travelers Map Taipei from Taiwan Non-human stuff It's getting some nice hits here Two maps in that Chip from Vegas So that's already two hits technically So we're at least supposed to get two I usually see three but If not those are probably just hits already Colby Stevenson And there you go three hits Melissa Humana Pardez Letter M Who has Letter M? Travis does what a break for you Travis And a Gaudi LeBron James Letter L another one for Travis This was actually really cool 58 out of 99 Wow another one Paige It's Peranek I really like that kind of Outer space feel Wozze Zeta Paulin Morakawa Ryan there you go guys That was The four boxes right there Got some nice stuff guys So you got a 1 in 14 shop for the non-human stuff So the Travelers Map And the Lady Luck Relic And then Giddy Pretty nice autographs too So you can get that in all the playing cards Whatever else is non-human Here we go So we got the customer names there Just got a new dice roll New list Roll it One out of five six times One Two Three Four Five And six What a break for you Travis Boom Travis Deeg congratulations man After six times you won the non-human stuff as well Next house in the store JasperysCaseBricks.com


What's up guys, welcome back to Hades, the roguelike where you are playing as Hades' son, whilst trying to escape.  Okay, I wanna talk to you, at least. I'll give them hell as you once did, Achilles, though doubtless many of the shades who stand against me first arrived in Tartarus because of you.  Yeah, Creek mythology is awesome. Seriously, this game is amazing. I am having so much fun. I don't know who that is. Talk to you later. How are you holding up, boy? Eating well lately? All three mouths full and happy? Each terrifying maw of the infernal watchdog surplus responds affirmatively to one after the next as if to reassure the other. And I'm a pet the doggie. Here, boy, just as long as one of your three heads enjoys these pets. Yay. You know what?  I'm gonna pet the dog if I want to pet the dog. Let me pet that one head. I can't wish it would let me pet the other three. Oh well. What do you want, Dad? Who's this nibbling shade to your immediate left there, father? Already found someone new to do the busy work. And here I thought I was utterly indispensable. This guy's fun. I kind of want a cosplay. Not gonna lie. That shade, boy, is my newly designated contractor. One whose responsibility is to work on this house. Though who shall pay for everything my subjects here demand I do not know. Interesting. You're trying to guilt me into funding the exorbitant furnishings you desire. Perhaps once we are finished with repairs for all the carnage you have sown throughout my realm, then we might finally have time for all the needed renovations that have piled up. Needed. Right. Nice. I'm just gonna continue hacking and slashing my way out of hell. Some sort of special offer for me, my good shade. Ooh, sweet zirst. A fountain chamber in the depths of Tartarus sounds like an excellent idea. What's that there? Something from the fates? I don't think I have the funds to do anything. Definitely don't, but this is still awesome. Legally, this is cool. You have returned. Yes. Doctor's guide you child. You have outgrown this house. Of that I am now surgeon. Should you return again here, I shall keep you safe. Cool. Good to know. Seriously, this game's style is amazing. Whatever this is. Shadow presence. There we go. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Oh. So let me have it. Give me everything you got. I don't remember having you on payroll, mate. Yeah. Who's your supervisor? Why are you British? Oh, I'm not about to wrap my sources, pal. Just try and beat it out of me. Okay. I'm guessing he's there to teach you how to use your weapons. Let's see how this weapon goes. I am not... I love bows and arrows, but especially games like this. Okay. Hello. I breathe. This is awesome. I do like that I get away with more. I say get away with more. I mean, can hit longer range more consistently. Might help me stay alive a little bit longer. All right, let's go on escape. Is that really what they're called? Oh, God. We are taking you. Let's go Poseidon's path. Let's see where this leads me. So keep it, babe. Come on.  Oh, my God. You gotta switch back to the sword. I don't know, felt easier for you.  Can I punch you? Yay. Oh, goody. I don't know what that is. Okay. Yay. Aw. I do love the fact that Achilles has a spear. Skelly. The Animated Ske- No, I want to- The Animated Skeleton and I, we seldom get along. He's too talkative for me.  Simply as though you're an expert in the ways of war. Ooh, cool. Severus. Killis. Yo! That's actually kind of cool. Also, I like that there is a kind of difference in the catholic gods and the Olympian gods. That's cool. That's really neat. Looks like some really big nerd. Thank you. Severus. Yeah. Pet the pooch. Can I stab Hades? I want to stab Hades. I'm sorry for reading that out. I just loved the voice. Weird. Yeah. And a scoop. Dianacis. Yeah. Sweet. Hey there, Zagman. How's it going? Look, you have got to get here with the rest of us already. We've been saving you a spot. Let me see what I can do. Make mine a little sweeter for you in the meantime. Yay! Oh my God, Dianacis is the best. I'm gonna go with Drunken Strike. Leave it to the God of Wine to liven things up around here. Hell's yes. Really, updated. Oh, Dianacis, sweet. Perhaps I ought to feel a kinship to the easygoing son of Zeus for it is said that some mortal blood in him, not just divinity. Actually, yeah. Dianacis' birth is weird. Like, really weird. Come here.  Come on, let's go. It'll be mine. This could even lock a weapon back at home. Yes, I know. Palm of Power or what looks like Aphrodite. I could potentially get a Coral Fract. That was a really bad joke and I am very sorry for it. Take that! Sucker! Okay, yes, I will. Hi there, in the name of Hades, I look at this, I accept this message. Yep, let's talk with Aphrodite.  God, do I love the design! And so, I've decided I shall aid you for the moment. Are you interested? Absolutely. I'm going to take this. And the power to break hearts. Sweet. Sure, I don't see why not. Aphrodite wields her body under charm much of the ways than the same lethality as I could wield a spear. I've seen her handiwork firsthand and it is often noted as pretty as she is. Ha! I don't even know. I want more weapon choices. This way. Die! I don't know what they do. Oh my god.  Okay, awesome. Let's go with the hammer. I'm going to be doing that. Key and death, or we're going this way. Made it this far. Ha ha! Got to be honest, not sure what else I was expecting. But... Blasted spank traps everywhere. Yep. That seems like a good place to end this episode. So... Yeah. This game is a lot of fun. I will see you in the next episode of this series which will most definitely be happening. But yeah, that's all I have for now. I hope you all have a fantastic day and as always, peace out guys.


Welcome to Spotlight Advanced. I'm Liz Wade. And I'm Bruce Gulland. Spotlight uses a special English method of broadcasting. It is easier for people to understand no matter where in the world they live. Two eyes. One nose. Lips surrounding a mouth. These simple parts help make up one of the most important part of people's bodies. The face.  But it may be far more important than you think.  Today's Spotlight is on. The human face. You are happy. Smile. Now you feel anger. Frown. Point the corners of your mouth down. Make a crease or line in the skin above your eyes. By moving your face into these positions, people already know how you feel. You do not even have to say a single word. In fact, some experts believe that your face can produce more than 10,000 different expressions. All these expressions are possible because of the muscles in your face. They form a kind of mask over your skull.  Your face is covered in muscles. To make an expression, you can move a few muscles at the same time. Or you can move only one muscle. Each combination is a different facial expression. The expressions on your face send a message to the person who is looking at you. Without using words, people can understand how you are really feeling. These facial expressions are a form of non-verbal communication. But did you know that your face may also be sending a message even if you do not want it to? The BBC produced a special series of programs about faces called The Human Face. In this program, they followed the story of a married couple in England called Eden and Mandy. Eden and Mandy were having a difficult time in their relationship. They fought often. They thought their marriage was probably over. But they decided to try one more thing. Mandy and Eden flew to the United States to meet with Dr. John Gottman. Dr. Gottman is a psychologist, a scientist who studies people. The BBC's The Human Face program described how Dr. Gottman attached machines to Eden and Mandy. He asked Eden and Mandy to talk to each other. As they talked, Dr. Gottman and his team of scientists observed how Eden and Mandy's bodies changed while they talked. Dr. Gottman found that arguing was hurting Eden and Mandy's relationship. But he also believed there was more. Their facial expressions were making things worse. As they fought, Eden and Mandy began to exchange looks of disgust and contempt. These expressions communicate hate and a lack of respect. Eden and Mandy never said they hated each other, but their facial expressions were communicating the message even without words. This might make you think about your own facial expressions. What are you communicating with your face? Can you see what other people are communicating with their faces? Experts say that facial expressions are not always the same between cultures. For example, people in one culture may use their eyes more to communicate a message. They will notice when the eyes are more open or closed. They will notice the lines around the other person's eyes. Reading a person's face is something we just do. We do not think about it. However, experts say there are at least seven facial expressions that everyone on Earth can recognize. They are universal expressions. These expressions are happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, contempt, and disgust. You can probably easily imagine what each of these expressions look like. You do not need language to communicate these feelings. Your face can communicate them for you, whether you want it to or not.  If you have, you know that making funny faces will usually make a baby react and maybe even laugh. Babies love to see different faces. When does this ability to recognize different facial expressions appear? Many scientists have studied how babies react to faces. We do know that babies recognize faces very soon after they are born. In 1974, researchers studied babies who were about nine minutes old. They showed the babies a picture of a face, a picture of shapes, or an empty page. When researchers moved the picture, they observed the babies. Researchers found that babies looked at the picture of a face longer than the other pictures. Even a few hours after they are born, babies will recognize their mother's face.  After a few days, babies can see the difference between a sad or happy face. They begin to copy the expression on a face. And around five months later, babies can recognize that a sad voice goes with a sad face. Researchers do not know exactly why or how babies develop these abilities so quickly. It may be that this is an important skill for survival. Babies around eight months old begin to change their behavior based on their mother's facial expressions. In one study, researchers looked at one-year-olds. They wanted the babies to walk down a small incline. When the mothers smiled at the babies, the babies walked down the small hill. But when the mothers frowned, the babies did not go down. Our faces communicate a lot of information at every age.  And we can understand what people are thinking just by seeing their face. Researchers try to understand why we need these skills. Some experts say that people who are good have a better chance at building relationships, getting a job, and working well with others. That is, our faces help us to be a part of a community. They connect us with other people. Have you ever thought about what your face communicates to others? What does your face show? Tell us what you think. You can leave a comment on our website or email us at contact at spotlightenglish.com. You can also find us on Facebook and YouTube. The writer of this program was Liz Wade. The producer was James Totten. The voices you heard were from the United States and the United Kingdom. You can listen to this program again and read it at www.spotlightenglish.com. This program is called What Is Your Face Saying? Visit our website to download our free official app for Android and Apple devices. We hope you can join us again for the next Spotlight program. Goodbye.