Hey guys, Andy Elliott. In this video, I want to talk to you about my take on substances like weed, drugs, porn, and alcohol. Okay? Now listen to me. The reason I'm going to share this stuff with you guys is because I want you guys to go to another level. So if I always talk sales, always talk business, always talk money, and I don't talk about this stuff, you may never get that stuff because of some of these advices. So check this video out. It's going to help you out a lot. Alright guys, Andy Elliott. In this video, I want to talk to you about porn. When have I ever talked to you about porn? Never. But now we're getting to the point. Now we're training over 500,000 sales. People will get 150 million views every 28 days on social media. I think I need to start talking to you guys a little bit. I'm not trying to become this space of this person, but about some things that are some core values that I live by so I can share it with you. Okay? That's it. So if you look up to me, if I mentor you, if you like what I have to say, I want you to hear me out on this. So number one, how I think about weed and substances and stuff like that, things that are drugs that literally dilute the way you think. I'll include alcohol into that as well. I need you to understand this. I never want to lose my state. I always want to be in control. Now I'm not telling you that you don't have a group of buddies, a group of friends that you trust that you can find a safe place.  He dies. Dude, you're in prison now. That fast. Your life's over. So when it comes to drinking, I would say, you know, two times a year, three times a year, you find a group of people that you love, that you trust and you can go to a safe place. If you want to have a drink with them, that's all on you. You know what I'm saying? That's completely up to you. But I'll tell you if you're going to do it, do it that way. Because people that do it the other way, they always tend to get into trouble and trouble will always find you when you're out drinking. And if you don't know what I'm saying, I mean, you'll know one day and you'll be like, damn, I should have listened to you. Okay, drugs. I don't like to alter my state. I see a lot of guys that, you know, they do drugs that say, I want to go home and after a long day, I want to smoke weed and relax. Why would you want to wind down, dude? Your goal is to keep your edge. Stay sharp. Stay strong. You don't want to wind down. If you go home at night and you're wanting to be a savage and you go smoke weed, instead of studying, staying fired up, letting your mind race and being like, dude, I'm going to keep growing my business.    I'm going to go have a drink. I need to go home and have a beer. Number one, dude, it's disrespectful if you have a family at home that's been waiting on you all day long because you've been working to go home. And now you're saying, I'm with them. I'm supposed to bring special energy to them and I'm going home having a drink because they're worthless to me. Dude, you should go home and have a blast with them and not be drinking. Secondly, if it is just you and you go home and you're winding down to have a drink, why would you want to wind down? Wind up. Is your bank account where you want it? Wind up, dude. Turn the training on. Train. Get better. Did Kobe Bryant go home and have a drink and wind down? Or did he wind up? Alright, put it on the calendar. November 28, 9 a.m. Mountain Standard Time. I'm going to be releasing the news that's going to shake the world.  So, be on the lookout. November 28, 9 a.m. Mountain Standard Time. I will be going live on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook.  I'm going to be streaming live so you need to set your calendars now.   See you on the call.   Why would you want to give away that pain? I use that pain when somebody burns me, when somebody screws me.   They're like, I need to go have a drink. Dude, why don't you feel that and understand it and let it bother you? That's called being alive. Like, don't you want to be alive? Like what? You only want to be sober when it's good and then when it's bad, you want to go get drunk?  Which you can't be drinking when you're going through it. Matter of fact, you need to lean into it, fill it and overcome it and become great.  And then I want to get into porn for a minute. I'm going to tell you this, right? I think we're in an era right now that people literally get what they want the second that they want it and that's why nobody has anything. So, if I right now was like, dude, I want to go and I want to feel good so I'm going to go watch some porn. Well, dude, first of all, that's fake. That's not real. So, you're never going to have anything real in your life and you set this standard that's how I live.   Guys, I mean, I need you to understand this. If you go this road, number one, it just proves you're undisciplined.  We're doing this. How powerful would that make you? How strong would that make you? How strong willed would you become? You know, I was talking to a buddy of mine named Ed Milet and he was saying that people, they somewhere along the way lose their will to win. They get to a certain point and then they sell out. Every day we need to be working on building our will to say no, to say no to things that we want to do but we know that aren't good for us. Is drinking alcohol good for us? No, say no. Is doing drugs good for you? No, say no. Listen, by the way, I'm being a good leader to you right now. Okay? Some of you may say, man, I can do that and get away with it. Yeah, but one day you're not. Okay? Do you want to really keep running the edge? You want to really keep testing yourself and seeing how far you can get? Is that really what you want? Dude, why don't you say no to all that and now you don't have anything to worry about?   Now, you don't have to watch porn. You'll have the hottest chick in the world.  You'll be high because of how amazing it is. And then alcohol, dude, I'm drunk on life, man. Dude, literally, if you don't understand how great life is, dude, you're missing it. Say no to this stuff, say yes to this. So, guys, as I'm building a massive business, we're building a massive following. I'm going to hit some topics sometimes that aren't normally the things that I talk about. But I want to talk to them with you because I know there's a lot of people giving a lot of bad advice out there. And I don't want you to get caught up in any of it and get caught up in one of those lies or get distracted, make a bad decision that you can't take back. Okay? So, I love you guys.  Anything that I know I want to share with you. Let's continue to grow. Let's keep killing it. Let's go through a season of saying no. Let's go do what's right and what we know we need to do. Let's build the life you deserve. Let's get it. Hey, guys, I just want to tell you, you're the true one percenters. You made it till the end of the video. Do me a favor. Share it with a friend that wants to go to another level. Make sure you like the video. Comment below so I know who you are. Set your notifications and then subscribe to the channel. We got daily sales training videos dropping. I'll see you soon.


Now, this is how Ilya Shapiro got in trouble because Ilya Shapiro put out a tweet that basically said look The most qualified liberal appeals court judge Who should be nominated to the Supreme Court? is a woman and her name is sorry Srinivasan Srinivasan, sorry Srinivasan and Ilya Shapiro, who is a column a libertarian, I think said if you are progressive liberal The judge that is most qualified That has gonna be the best for you as a liberal Democrat would be Srinivasan and she happens to be Indian of Sri Lanka and in terms of skin color pretty dark, but She doesn't count. She can't be nominated to the Supreme Court. She will not be placed on the Supreme Court Even though she's the most qualified candidate not by skin color not by sex but by ideology and objective qualifications for legal scholars She won't because she's not black enough She won't because she's not black from the right side of the world She won't because her people Were not enslaved at least not in America who knows what was done to them in previous generations in India Or wherever it is she comes from but this is the insanity insanity of Racism she is Shalinese So off the coast of India Shalinese I'm not sure I'm not sure Shalinese is I'm sure that I'm sure the I Don't know what culture I mean culturally. They're probably very much like India. I don't know that would be interesting I don't know much about the people in Ceylon, Sri Lanka, but My point is who cares Who cares where exactly she come from What matters is her qualifications Okay, Sri Lanka is Ceylon Thank you under Freeman. I appreciate that. I I suspected that but it I'm glad I wasn't gonna say it. I'm glad you Qualified that Tamil culture. I'm told is the culture of South India, which is Sri Lankan, but it doesn't matter She's an American. I don't know if she was born in America But she's an American and a enormously qualified judge and she won't go to the Supreme Court now because of her anything She has done said written now because she's not qualified. She's the most qualified at least according to Ilya Shapiro But because she's not from Africa Well, it's not even true because their ancestors are not for Africa. We live in a sick culture that produces this kind of results Now unfortunately for Ilya And Ilya, you know is a just to give you a sense of who Ilya is He is a legal scholar He has worked for the Kato Institute for many years He has just been appointed the executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution Which is a very prestigious position Georgetown is a top law school and of course in a heart of dc and You know Ilya is a great guy. I follow him on Twitter. I follow a lot of his stuff He's a he's a good guy. He's super smart. I don't agree with him on everything, but he's super smart And and really interesting So he said say in a series of tweets he criticized Joe Biden's pledge to consider only black women for the soon vacant Supreme Court and in the course of arguing That This judge judge siri whose name I can't pronounce would be far and away the best pick for biden Shapiro tweeted and this was his big This is how we got into trouble Shapiro tweeted, but alas He doesn't fit into the latest intersectionality hierarchy So we'll get less a black woman Now what he means here is I guess siri is a is a man So he it is I thought he was a woman. Okay, so it's a black. It's a it's a it's a Man from Sri Lanka is this bell in court judge. I thought it was a woman for some reason anyway What got him in trouble was we'll get Alessa black woman Now Ilya is not arguing that black women Alessa He's arguing here. What he's saying here is That the best candidate of all of any color skin, which is a bizarre way to put it For a progressive leftist is Sri this guy Sri right And as a consequence of that You're gonna get somebody Alessa Who's a black woman not because black women Alessa But because Biden has said he'll only choose a black woman, but you can see How this is easily misunderstood and Shapiro knew this and deleted his tweet quickly and apologized for it and all Did all the right things, but it was too late too late the dean of the law school flipped out Students flipped out You know, they piled on Shapiro They called him a racist, which is if you if you know anything about Ilya Shapiro and you followed his work You know that is ludicrous He was placed on the day today. He was supposed to start yesterday No, sorry on Tuesday. He was supposed to start as executive director of this new center. It was placed in administrative leave There's going to be an investigation about whether he violated the policies and expectations of professional conduct and so on All because some people chose to read a tweet that he wrote in a way That he's clearly not intended And that he criticized Biden's choices Now this is Georgetown University Georgetown University University. It took no discriminatory action in 2018 When a feminist professor said And I'm quoting right quoting That entitled white men Who supported Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, but the entitled white men deserve miserable deaths While we castrate their corpses and feed them to the swine Indeed when some students demanded something to be done about this professor Georgetown went out of it their way To defend that females professors free speech rights So you can call white men You can You can claim they deserve death And you can describe how you're going to castrate them and feed the corpses to swine And that's okay But to argue for a colorblind supreme court To argue for a president to choose The most qualified candidate rather than the candidate who has a particular color skin And even there a particular heritage worth a particular color skin because Who knows if if if swine is more black or less black than whoever Biden ultimately nominates That Deserves condemnation. I mean this is just unbelievable and this is not Idiots, this is the dean of the Georgetown University Law Center.  Don't worry And uh, whatever food they order in the school of reimbursed them I mean we've gone So soft as a culture Sit in should be illegal Never mind giving them a safe space to cry and providing them with food Amy wax is not good.  This is the kind of stuff that We're getting to the kind of attitude the kind of Stuff that we're deteriorating to because Of the succession with race that appears to be on all sides All right, I'm gonna play you. This is uh, it's one minute long. So we're gonna play this oops No, we're not we're gonna it's of intolerance and bigotry and anger and hateful Sexual oppression. What if Michael Dyson call you and mean mean white man?  Yeah. Yeah, you're not mean at all.   I'm kind of tan So am I white? How tan am I? Am I more tan when I'm in Puerto Rico than when I'm in Toronto, Canada Does tanning count? How dark is dark? What is white? He was actually not black. He was sort of brown. And he's not black now. So Dyson's not black. He's just brown Is black just a figurative to coming from from some ancestry in Africa? How much blackness counts as black?  Yeah, now Joe is dark. So Maybe Joe's not white, but what is white? Who qualifies? Where do we set the criteria? Is there pigment meter? Is there a meter that defines who's white? Who's black the whole thing?   Well, I'm italian and he was bright. Yeah, italian whites Suddenly the british didn't think so They categorized them as a different race And they were dark skinned and they will look down upon Down not black. Well So jao says it's not exactly like that, but that you know, it's somewhat like that It's not exactly like that, but it's somewhat like that Where do you define? Where's the boundary? What defines you on what side? Isn't that weird? Yeah, it's really weird black and white thing is so strange because the shades and brown There's such a spectrum of shades of people unless you're talking to someone who is like 100 african From the darkest place where they're not wearing any clothes all day And they've developed all that melanin to protect themselves from the sun You know it's even the term he got into trouble with that from the darkest place and he could all day He got he got into trouble for saying that but It's about me. I'll tone it. I mean not me. I'll tone it It's about sking pigment That's all they matter that all it is It's skin pigment And yet we're taking skig pigment And we're turning it into something important Something significant something that we evaluate people based on something that gets you or doesn't get you into the supreme court Melanin, thank you That's the deciding how much melanin do you have in the skin?  It's a it's a and when you use it for people that are Literally my color. It becomes very strange. Yeah.  It's despicable when Joe Biden does it. It is despicable when Students at Georgetown do it. It's despicable when whoopee does it whoopee only counts racism When it affects black versus white Well, it turns out that other people have different views of racism whoopee and she's suffering the consequences of that Now there's a sense in which people Goldberg is right Since there isn't such a thing as race. It's a made-up thing And nazis were Anti-Jewish they hated Jews. They killed Jews. They slaughtered Jews They also hated blacks If there were more blacks in the environment, they would have slaughtered them too They hated gypsies. They killed gypsies left and right, you know, the the the this these arguments about a concept That has ultimately no legitimacy Is horrific and the more we emphasize it the more we get away from Martin Luther King's vision of a colorblind society The more we get away from a society of individualists The more we get away from Intermarriage, which is I think the best thing that happening in the world today the rise of intermarriage So Joao says You're an actually light brown skinned people with slightly black facial features. The class fight is black over here It wasn't always like this. I know it wasn't But it's the trend in brazil right now again copying the us brazil was Better than the us with regard to this I think in the past and it's people are copying the us We're becoming More racist not less racist More focused on this and again, you're getting it from the right From people like richard who want to make a big deal out of group differences. This is what's important in life And you're getting it from the left black lives matter We got to elect a black woman to the supreme court I mean our what matters is our genetic makeup and that matters almost entirely For our health not for anything else. It doesn't determine our moral character. It doesn't determine our productivity. It doesn't determine The choices we make The kind of persons we are It determines elements of our intelligence, but even there. I don't think the most important ones And there's just no such thing as race in genetics There's lineage there's a place where you came from and if you do a 23 in me You'll find that you come from a lot of different places a lot of different places Thank you for listening or watching the iran book show If you'd like to support the show We make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening. You get value from watching Show your appreciation. You can do that by going to iran book show dot com slash support by going to patreon subscribe star locals and just making a appropriate contribution On any one of those any one of those channels also if you'd like to see the iran book show grow Please consider sharing our content and of course subscribe Press that little bell button right down there on youtube so that you get announcement when we go live and for you Those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who already supporters of the show Thank you. I very much appreciate it


Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome. Welcome to the Stock Swish Show Market Review. The spy here going to take a look and see what the market is doing right now. It's rallying. Are you surprised? The answer is no. I had 100% conviction that we were going to hold in here between yesterday and this whole look that we've had for the last week or so. I forgot the minutes were announcement route today. Actually, this morning, when I was looking at the market and it was squished watching around, and I said the call today was bullish slash neutral. But then obviously, the minutes announcement came out at 2 o'clock. Market had a reaction, a hard strike down, made the bottom entail in the 15 minute chart, and quickly, quickly bounced. We could even close over the high today. That's not completely ridiculous, actually. Not even a dream target, but we are on our way to the next number here. We're going to do it right now. This market's going to go over the high right now. Look at this. They call this market long for the whole year. I've been saying we're higher the whole year and we're going to make a new high right now, actually. All right, let's go all the way back. Let's go all the way back. I did talk about this in a video and I was explaining this back from before, but let's really go back now. Again, I read gaps. That's how I determine what to trade, what direction to trade, what stock to trade. It's the reason that I've called the market so well is because I'm reading the gaps. The market had a bullish gap back here. This is all the way at the beginning of 2012. Carry the market higher, nice rally into 2012, and that was the instigator here that was assigned to lift everything up, and then, of course, continue. 2013 was a nice bullish year, true. 2014 has been a nice bullish year, true, but if you knew how to read gaps, you would have been in this knowing this was going to continue higher back all the way here at the beginning of 2012. And look at what this market has done since then. That's beautiful and it's amazing, just in that span of time in the two years here. Here we go. We're going to go over the high right now. This is the thing of beauty, I tell you. So let's go back to May. This was the time in here when everyone was saying, market's going to come in, market's topping, market's extended, market needs a correction. Traders were shorting this. You don't short tops. There was nothing to short in here. I know we had a couple of red bars, big whoop-de-doo, that's the people doing some profit taking in here, but even all of this was happening, and I said the market was higher, then the market gapped up. I talked about this gap and I realized it very quickly, quickly, quickly after I saw that this was a significant gap in the market, and I did say this gap could hold the entire year of 2014. And who knows how long it could hold. It's going to hold as long as it's going to hold. This spawned a rally up where the spine made new highs, came in, gapped down here. This isn't a gap down that broke this chart. Came in, retested, held in here, held where. Again, support and resistance are areas held in support here, and nice bounce off of this area and was looking for the market to continue higher even in here. Pulled down a little bit again, people are shorting this, and here's what's going to happen here. People should never short this market, but people did, and they're going to have to get out when it gets over the area again. Next target is 202. 203. 203.50 is actually a number. 203.50 is something. It's a number. And anyway, so then the market came in, and we had a bearish look to ourselves for about two days. That's it. Two days, but I knew it wasn't really going anywhere, and even though we gapped down yesterday morning, I said the market was along. That was a great call. I saw it five minutes into the open at 9.32 to buy the market yesterday. We bought the market yesterday. This was new buying. New buying that came into the market yesterday. Held on a bearish gap down, triggered on a daily buy, set up, rallied into the close, and now, higher through higher today. The minutes were out at 2 o'clock today. This morning, the market sloshed around a neutral slash bullish area this morning because it was waiting for the minutes announcement at 2 o'clock. And here we are. We're making a new high right now. What a beautiful chart here. Over 58. Here we go. Markets that spies the new highs here right now. Wow. Here it goes. Look at this. Amazing. So, once again, I said in the next four to six months, the market is going to see some crazy, crazy bullish numbers, some target in the spy and accuse that nobody's even thinking is going to even happen. It's going to be some crazy number that nobody even expects to be happening because so many people have called the market to crash and that we're too extended and that we're getting toppy. And as a result of this, I think people are taking profits too early. Also, they're not buying when they should be buying because it's all the things that could be along here and making money while the market's driving higher. And then what's going to happen is people will also buy late. So, what's going to make this market go to some crazy, crazy numbers is a combination of everything and that's why the number is going to be crazy for the target. People are shorting this market that shouldn't be shorting it because they think it's extended and they want to get a reversal move. That's the wrong thing to do. They keep trying to do it, making attempts and they keep getting stopped at every time. So, then that creates a lift. Second thing that's happening here that's going to make the market go a lot higher is that new buying, new money is really coming into the market and it's going to continue to do so. The next thing is going to happen or it's happening here is that people are going to see that they missed the chance to actually buy and they're going to buy and they're going to buy late because, again, you should be in this long already. And then people are going to buy late, like now or even past now actually because what's going to happen is every time somebody looks at this, they say, well, I think this is too late to buy and then they're going to not do it. Then they're going to wait for somebody else to happen. They're going to say, well, it's too late here. It's going to come in for correction here and then it's still not coming in for correction as you see in here today with us over the high. And then eventually people are going to come late to the party and buy that always happens and then you're going to get some huge massive move up to some crazy number and that's what's going to happen too. And you know, it's going to be the next four to six months. Spy can hit 250, 225, 230, 250. I'm not even going to discount a number like 300 here. It's just the timing of it, timing of it. I think the spy hits 300 in the next 12 months. That's all I'll say for that. I'm not going to say with definitive 100% conviction before the end of the year, but in the next 12 months, I think it happens. The bullish market's going to run continuing to 2015. But I know it's going to hit a crazy number that no one expects in the next four to six months. And then we'll see how we act. And I'm not saying we drive straight up. We're going to have activity like we've had in here. But when people say the market's going to crash, you're going to do something crazy, crazy bearish. There's no indication of that. There's no at bearish activity. It's even at remotely happiness market. Markets have a nice rally and you just play the trend. You run, run with it. That's the right thing to do. This idea of playing momentum as a trader to get a reversal.  That's what's going to happen in here. People that short of this market keeps happening. It keeps happening. You see keep happening here. This is why you have this type of extension that's happening here now, where you have this beautiful lift here today and even yesterday because I know people tried to make an attempt to short the market yesterday. You can see it on the 15 minute chart right in here. When the market came up and retested the resistance yesterday in here, people shorted this. It was not as short. It was a long and then it rallied. This was the rally into 230 reversal time yesterday. The funny thing is that I like to go short. I like to short stocks and I'm shorting stocks in a bullish market successfully, which is hilarious, but what's even more hilarious is how extremely precise and well I've called this market not just a real-life time, but for extended, like I'm calling things are going to happen out ahead of time and they are. Like I said, the spy was going to hit 200 way before it did, way before it did, and I'm seeing things so far in the future in advance. How am I seeing this? I'm reading the trading action. I'm reading the price. I'm reading the power of money and the way it's moving and reading the gaps. I'm reading the gaps. That's how I'm seeing all this is going to happen. I'm reading the gaps and I understand it, but the funny thing is I like to short. I'm reading a bullish market well and I like to short, but I think you have to learn how to re-gaps. If you learn how to re-gaps, you'll learn how to reprice accurately. It's extremely important and you can study stuff. You can do all the things you want to do above and beyond them on top of your chart reading and chart analysis and reading a price, but I don't think you have to. How do I know? Because I'm not and I'm calling this well, so if you read the price in real-life time, how something's actually acting right now, you can get it. You can do all the study you want above and beyond if you have time to do the stuff outside of it, but all you have to do is read price and money in a chart. And if you do that, that's all you need to do to be able to trade successfully. All the analysts, all the institutions, all the hedge funds, they're doing the work. All the extra work that they have to do the study analysis, let them do it. And then when they take a position in something, I see what's happening with the stop or the market and then I'm just reading the price action. So I don't have to do that other extra work because those other people, the people that are putting the money into the market are doing that work. I don't have to do that work as a trader, which is a beautiful thing if you know how to reprice, which I do in the gaps. So lovely bullish move here in this market and I'm just going to continue to see things in the way that I've seen them. I have no idea where we open tomorrow morning. I have no idea where we close tonight. It's too early to say it's 3.15. We didn't get up near the number and we did get over the number and this is extremely bullish and I mean, this is basically setting up like a breakout play for the possibility that we could gap up tomorrow or open neutral tomorrow and just run like crazy higher tomorrow. I don't know. But we'll have to see where we close exactly in here today. So again, nice reaction here in the minutes, bullish reaction in the market, carry the market up over, broke over the high a little bit. This still counts. Wherever we close today doesn't take away from the rally that's happened here and the fact that we got over the high and the gap down failure yesterday to go lower, even into a deeper level of support is confirmation at the market's higher, which you're seeing the fall through today. So there's no surprise really in this here, although I think people were surprised yesterday how extremely bullish the market traded, but I called it well into 932. Time was up. It was so early yesterday when I called that. I'm like it was early. And again, it's because I was reading the gap. Yeah, it set up earlier in the queues. I'm still in the first five minutes of the day. Still in the first five minutes of the day yesterday plus five, but set up earlier actually in the QQ queues. So again, the next four to six months are going to, the market's going to run up and continue higher and in the next 12 months, the market could go to some just amazing number like 300 from here. And that's huge. I mean, that's huge, huge. Just because something is bullish doesn't mean that it's can't go higher. Just like something, if it's trading down doesn't mean it can't go lower. And every time the market has activity like it had in here and like it had in here takes away from this looking at this extended look. When I read this and I say, when I look at this chart here, if I just go, my brain just snapshots this chart here, I say, beautiful, perfect. Okay. I don't say extended. I don't say anything like that. And I don't say anyone should be shorting this either because they shouldn't be. But to see from the last few months, the market was going to continue to do this was pretty darn good. And if you go back and track all my market calls on YouTube, you can see how I've tracked it over and over and over again every time I see something. So I'm putting it out there now. The next four to six months of market is going to go and continue bullishly to some crazy number unless it does some gap down where I see is breaking the chart, which I don't see setting up now, but will in my time, if it doesn't, and we'll make the call, I also see that there's a possibility that the spy somewhere between now and the next 12 months could go to 300. And that's not even ridiculously out of the water. I mean, it's just not here. Here, look at this. We could close the 202 today. 250 is a number somewhere. I'm getting that. Where am I getting that? It's just coming to me. I think 203 203 50 is something that number sticks in my head. So great job. Anyone who went along the market yesterday and held it into the target, which you got to market going to the target today again, would you go along this? It'd be aggressive to trade during the minute period. I don't suggest that something trader should do. Look at this here. Spy is going to close and try to make it up to 201 for the close 45 minutes left in the day. It's very likely could happen. And we'll look to see for follow through tomorrow and this unless we have a different look to ourselves tomorrow morning in the gap where we gap and the spy. But this looks like we're going to run up into the close. It also looks like we're probably going to gap up into the post market tonight and tomorrow morning because this is so strong looking people. This is just so strong looking and who would have ever short this market. But people did. I know they did. I'm on a thousand email list from a million different educational companies out there and all different stock tip things telling people that market was going to crash, telling people to short this market, telling people to sell out of the longs, telling people the market's going to need a correction, telling people the markets extended. They were all wrong. And I was right. So how do I know to stick to what I know here to keep reading and making these calls? Because I have a high level confidence in myself in reading price direction. And that comes from one thing and one thing only my analysis of gaps, my analysis of every bullish gap that I see in this chart and the bearish gaps that I don't see the follow through in, like the one that gap down yesterday and reversed and the one that gap down here and didn't go anywhere. And the bullish gap that happened here that lifted the market and the one back here that held. So I'm analyzing these things. And if you're just looking at body extension, you can't tell anything because this is a large red bar and this is a small green bar. So it's not even about that. Okay. It's about looking at it. And again, I have a 26 point rating system where I look at, which is based on technical analysis, when I'm looking at the chart and then determining what this gap is going to do. If this gap is going to follow through on the gap up or on the gap down, whether it's a long or whether it's a short. And that's how I do it and took me a long time to figure this stuff out.  So good job anyone today here that went along the market yesterday. Follow it through. We'll see where we head tomorrow. We're headed up to the next target, which is 202, 203, 203.50 in the spy. The next two days, Thursday and Friday in the market, we'll see where we go and just let the market rally. And no one should be showing this market. It is not the right thing to do. The market is extremely bullish. And the last two days have proven that completely 100%. Have a great day everyone. If you need any more information, if you're interested in the upcoming golden gap class to learn how to read gaps in the way that I do, I teach a class, I teach people how to look at these things the way that I see them through my eyes, through the analysis, through the study. The classes September 27th and 28th, email me and Melissa at the stockswush.com. If you'd like more information or want to sign up, fall is a great time to trade. Fall is an amazing time to trade. And if you think this market is bullish, you haven't seen anything yet. And you heard it right here at the stockswush.com, which is me, Melissa. Have a great day everyone.


Well, while we wait for the AV guy, let me tell you a bit about my museum because I don't think a lot of you may have visited it. Has anyone here visited? Okay, so a couple. So we're in Sydney and the museum was founded about 27 years ago by Holocaust survivors. Many people are actually really surprised to find such a museum in Sydney, but really Australia and New Zealand saw a massive influx of survivors come here. They really wanted to get as far away from Europe as possible. They wanted to start a new life, and this saw a great influx in our communities. And so my museum is a really special place, and this is the feedback we get from visitors, is it's a very personal experience. So when I started there 14 years ago, we always had Holocaust survivors on the floor. As visitors came and learned through this history, they spoke to actual people who had survived it, and this was a really moving encounter. It was very personal, and I think it was very special, particularly compared to some of those really larger institutions overseas, like the United States Holocaust Memorial. And this, especially for the staff who know these survivors, this has been really important to us. I think it's been hard because really we know that this time is ending. We have now about 40 Holocaust survivors who share their stories, many of which though who are children. And these programs, we get the feedback it's really, really popular. And so when schools come, they do a three-hour program. They do one-hour seminar with one of our educators. They listen to a testimony from an actual survivor for one hour, and then they go on a museum for a tour for another hour. And it's always the survivor voice that makes the greatest impact. And we've been doing these Remember Me programs. So once a month, we have a Holocaust survivor give a talk to the public, and they book out all the time. We can facilitate about 250 to 300 people, and they will be sold out before it comes. And so we have this dilemma, because we know that this wonderful experience we can offer is coming to an end. And so we've been really grappling with like, what do we do? How do we preserve this for future generations? And surprisingly, you would be really kind of curious to know that up until the year 2012, the museum actually didn't consider testimony as part of its project, as part of its collection. It's when I launched this moving image and sound archive that it finally was reclassified as actual objects. And I think that was really important for us, because there is an extra kind of care in the preservation. And just since this is a conference, I'll let you know what we're kind of doing. So everything is being accessioned onto our collection management database, which we use an axial product called AdLib for those of you who go and attend the axial conferences. We've been using Trent to do our transcripts. It's an online transcription service. It works pretty well, though a lot of times the transcripts need cleaning. We have volunteers doing that. And we preserve in three different formats, which is an MP4 for access. We're doing a movie file for working and JPEG 2000 for preservation. Now, I'm very interested in preservation. So if anyone is working in this area, it's something that always is the pain of my existence, please come talk to me because I'm really curious to hear what everyone else is doing. So how are we using this? So when we redid our new permanent displays a couple years ago, we were thinking about how to use testimony and we debated this to no end. Do we have those screens where you know it's just on a loop? Do we have one story where a visitor follows a survivor around? Do we have clips? Do we do audio? Do we do audio only? Do we do audio visual? And so one of the things we created is this app called Voices. So Voices is actually based on the technology employed by Mona, the Museum of New and Old Art at Tasmania. So it's their platform, which is really great to reuse because it's not reinventing the wheel. And what you have to do is in our displays, there's these icons. And when a visitor sees that, you can actually listen to testimony. So we made it so you first had to listen to the survivor testimony. It was very important for us. And then once you listen to the survivor testimony, you have the option of listening to a perpetrator, a witness, a curator, a historian. And we even have human rights people in this field of human rights talking about the implications today. And it works very well. We had a lot of debates whether or not it should be the audio only or if it should be the video. And we went with audio because we really felt it was important not to have people staring into their phones. We wanted them to engage with the displays. We wanted them to be looking at the objects as they went through. I'll tell you one thing that didn't really work, though, since we're among friends. We did faces. And the reason we did faces is because we wanted the displays to be personal. Not everyone is very apt at reading the differences in faces. We found for some younger demographics that they had a really difficult time differentiating between older white men. And that was a struggle for us. And we didn't know that at the time. But just if you're thinking of doing that, be warned. We didn't get all away from video. We do have video listening stations throughout the museum where you can select and there's clips that basically speak to different themes. And so most of our material actually comes from the USC Shoah Foundation. And this is a massive archive. They did 2,500 interviews in Australia with Holocaust survivors. And it is a wonderful resource. And basically these are very long interviews. They go for about three hours and they have tons and tons of questions and it's a whole of life interview. So it starts with someone's childhood. It comes right up to their story of migration and their present day. The problem with these are they are, well, they're a really valuable resource. They are really difficult to use in exhibitions. They are hard to cut. They are also hard because they go on for so long that really when the crux of the story is two hours in, the person doesn't really have the energy to really speak to the events like they should. Now I should still say we do continue doing these sorts of testimonies. Anyone who contacts the museum will do these three or four hour blocks and we keep them in our archives and they are great for research. But presentation, they're really hard. So in 1992 when the museum opened, we have this collection of testimonies that were filmed specifically for the opening. And these are my favorite ones and they were done basically with the mindset of they were going to be used in the exhibition. And I think these are really brilliant as well because they are highly produced. So if the survivor starts a story and it doesn't start in the wrong stop, the actual director stops them and has them stop like at a very good point where it can be edited. And the fifth or the sixth days, you know, memory doesn't serve me right anymore. We were put into cattle wagons to go to concentration camps. You know what? A big relief. A big relief because I was so naive, we were so badly informed, it was kept so well secret that I thought I'm going to meet my first husband and my parents and my sister. It never entered my head that it could be extermination camps. I was sure I'm going to meet them so that when we were herded into the wagons and the terrible conditions, I'm sure that you heard it. I mean, we just, we couldn't lay down, nobody wanted to lay down anyhow, but we just could sit under, shoulder to shoulder, under boards, I mean floorboards, and there was a pail for usages of the toilet, men, women, children, old people, young people, newborn children, you name it, it was there, and no food, I mean for the trip who cared about us, nobody. I started with my girlfriend singing because we were happy we are going to meet our parents and everybody shushed us up. You made who wants to sing because we were happy, you know, we thought we are going to meet them, but more do we want, we will be reunited. And so then, so we've had a few testimony projects like that, and so they're on various backgrounds and we have quite a big collection, but starting around in 2012, we started to realize that our objects, our collection is also stories, like we knew that, but like we started talking about more of them as actual placeholders for people's stories, these containers of memory. And so we became very interested in going back to our donors and filming them regarding items that they have collected in the museum. And for me, I think really when the survivor generation passes, it's going to be our collections that are really going to come to the forefront. And having them talk in their own words about the meanings of these collections, I think is going to actually come to the forefront. So we started this project going back to their homes. Now I'll also say, because we've gone back to a show of style filming, because we always have these debates, should you do it in the studio or should you do it in somebody's home? And there's pluses and minuses for both, because in the studio you have a very nice consistent look. It's very easy for exhibition. You have control of sound and lighting very easily. But in their homes, there's something special, I think the person is more comfortable. They can be a little bit more relaxed in their interview. Also, you can you get a sense of who they are by their surroundings, the pictures on the end table. And so I think it does add a little bit of personal touch to it. And we do go back and forth and we film in both ways. My name is Judith Nechum, N-A-C-H-U-M. I was born the 7th of July, 1928, on the German check border, which was called Sudeten. And we live there in that place in our house with my father and my sister till 1938. This number I got in Germany, it must have been issued in Erderand, because I don't think that I got a number in Auschwitz. I had a blue frock and nothing else, no coat, no undies, not anything. This number was stitched to my overalls, always on the left side, was here. And that number stayed with me till we came back home. I had to have it. It had a meaning for me. I thought if I survived the war and I have got something to prove it, then my father is going to come back, because whatever I worked hard, I would tell myself, if I can do it, my dad will be able to do it. I also had my first love. I was 16 years and I fell in love with a boy who came from Westerbork, from Holland. He was a Dutch boy and to my eyes he was the most beautiful human being that I have ever seen. I had always a complex that I had neither good-looking nor have I got a good figure and that this boy fell in love with me was just something special. So this was the number that my father and my boyfriend whose name was Thomas would survive the war and would come back not wanted, not my father and not Tommy and not his mother and not his father. I just had to have it. I needed something to prove after my hair grew back again that I was really there. That's why I kept it. So our latest filming project, because one of the things I'm always asked is how do we keep their voices alive? How do we preserve things, this material for the future? And so going through our archives, one of the things that struck me is we actually didn't have any full-length testimony of our survivors. It's one thing that just wasn't present. And I was particularly inspired, I don't know if anyone saw the Stong Lines exhibition at the National Museum of Australia. It was a fantastic one where they had filmed Aboriginal elders full-length and they were placed through the exhibition and it brought a real feeling of community in. And so we embarked on another filming project. It was actually quite a big setup to film our survivors. And what we did in this filming is we were trying to accomplish three things. So again, we were going with the object interviews. And one of the ideas is, too, is we can create pepper's ghosts with the exhibitions. We can have full screens, you know, them with their object there. But we also did two other things. So we were trying to capture very short vignettes of their story, something from three to five minutes that could be edited, either for educational purposes or for displays to use as certain junctures. And then we also did FAQs. So frequently asked questions, because there's some that the students always ask.  And so we asked everybody these sorts of questions and how we're going to use it. I actually don't know, but it was felt that we should do this for a time when they're not here to answer these questions that, you know, we do have the possibility. I'll show you some of this footage as well. Welcome to the Sydney Jewish Museum. My name is George Kronowski. I was born in Poland and I am 91 years old. She came back with one of the officers. I had to jump into the cupboard and hide behind the clothes. And I would be as quiet as a mouse. It was dark. It was so dark. It was dark. It was so dark you couldn't see anything. And I had lice and I was itching. And I couldn't scratch because the slightest movement would have given me away. And I could hear the creaking, the noise, the laughing. It was an eternity. I thought the night would never end. I carried always a piece of bread. It was a definite hang-up because the hunger, what I have experienced, it always left me with the fear that I won't have something to eat.  I said, what's wrong with me? Look, I'm carrying a piece of bread. So she said to me, Carmel, say her name. Even it's very, very, that's all you have a hang-up. You're doing very well.  And I did. And I'm happy to tell you I've lost that fear. I don't carry anything anymore with me. This belt was the only thing they left us from our own position. Every time I changed camps or time passed, I had to make another hole because it became smaller and smaller. Eventually, I don't think even that this was enough to hold up my trousers. So little, so small I was. I actually, what I really love about this format of testimony is that you really get to see all of their gestures. I found when we interviewed the child survivors, they would often kick their feet, like their little kids in school. You can see them gripping their hand. A lot of the information that you actually really lost with the portraits. And it's now my new favorite. And this was done with the anticipation of being able to create a really beautiful exhibition, maybe Pepper's Ghosts. Maybe we could 3D scan our objects and really make something immersive with it. But I'm still being asked, how are we going to preserve for the future? So I don't know if anyone is familiar with the work that the Shoah Foundation is undertaking. Is anyone familiar with this at all? OK. Yeah. So this is their dimensions of testimony project. Now, I should say the Shoah Foundation is located at the University of Southern California. And they have a massive research budget because they actually do a lot of research for the film industry there. And they benefit from a lot of this. And so this is a volumetric filming orb that they created. The original filming was actually 123 cameras all around here. You can kind of see the red lights. I think the British Museum is doing something very similar right now with David Attenborough. And basically what you can do with all of these views is in the future when there is something in the round, you can create a hologram or a hologram like holograms are with lasers. But we'll use the word hologram just for convenience. And so they've been doing this project. And so that has inspired us. And I'll show you one of the things that you can do with this project. So what you could actually do with all of these views, these are all projectors, is you can project all in like a three dimensional array. And so you actually have a sense of volume when you are filming. It doesn't actually come out very well on the screen, but it is actually really fancy. So we are now creating an array. And this is what ours is looking at. Though we are actually experimenting with doing something in the round in 360 degrees. At the moment we're looking at more of 120 degrees. And this is 19 cameras. There are mirrors, these are mirrors in between. So you actually get 52 views out of all of these cameras. And with the 52 views, basically some companies are already kind of experimenting with these screens in the round where the projections come in and you can walk around and you can get a three dimensional view. And the more views you have, the more opportunities you have to create something. One of the issues with this, and why we've kind of gone with 120 degrees rather than the 360, is we have a data management issue. As you can imagine filming with one camera how much data you collect, we are planning on doing at least a nine day shoot up to a 15 day shoot. And we are expecting to generate anywhere between 400 to 800 terabytes worth of data. Which is its own problem, which is giving us a massive headache. It's actually half of the issue, which is why we said, okay, people really don't need to see the back of that. And if you're listening to a testimony, then like, does someone actually have to look behind them? But there are arguments about like, well maybe you should just do it in the round because one day if you do want to have Holocaust survivor stationed in your museum around you will want that back view. I don't know. We're still kind of working out that budget right now and how to manage all of the data. I am pleased to say that the Shoah Foundation is helping us with all of this. So their tech people are working with our tech people here because we're actually looking to build, they do have a traveling rig that is now being sent all around the world. They are using 23 different cameras for it and a green screen, but we're looking at constructing our own that can stay in the Australian New Zealand region and kind of collect stories all around here. And just so you can see with the camera. So if you see this T right here, that's your subject. So this poll is put. So you can see how the poll has moved to the other side. So that's what the mirror does is it just kind of gives you those alternative views. And so this is a project that we are hoping to start in April and fingers crossed it all goes well. As of now, nobody's actually using the kind of three dimensional ish projections as of yet, but hopefully within the next few years, we're gonna be able to actually do a display with all of it and as technology catches up, this is kind of how we're seeing the best way to future proof ourselves. So that's it. If anyone has any questions or if you wanna talk to me during the tea, very happy. It was so brilliant and really compelling and amazing to have it documented and available for the public. So we've got a microphone down the back somewhere for questions. Does anybody have a question for Shannon? Thank you very much. That was really good. I did have a question. You mentioned data management issues, which was what I was thinking when you were showing that. What are you doing? Where are you up to so far in terms of managing all of the video that you have? Yeah, so if we were in the US, it would all be a lot easier because a lot of these servers and infrastructure, we would just be able to loan, but it doesn't actually exist in Australia. So that is becoming a problem. So we're looking to actually borrow the hardware from the Shoah Foundation Institute and bring it back to us. They're actually gonna help us a lot with the data management and backup because it really is past our infrastructure. Right now, we're kind of leaning towards LTO tapes because that is the most economical way and then we would keep, we're doing two hero cameras. So one will be the full length and then we're doing a second, which is portrait because marketing likes that for Facebook and whatnot. And so we would have those two files available on site and then everything else would go into a cold storage is looking because otherwise, like to build a whole server, we're talking about 75,000 is what we're gonna, just for this. Thank you. And I think the mic is working now. I don't think we've got time for any more questions, unfortunately. I'm really sorry, but Shannon will be available in the afternoon tea break and things if people want to have a chat. Thanks, Shannon.


Hello, my friends. This is a very important message for anybody riding rag brie this year Have you always wanted a hot pink t-shirt that says team dozer on it? Well, now is your chance because we're selling them for 20 bucks You can order them right now up until July 2nd And then we will have them waiting for you at the rag brie expo the day before rag brie starts We are not shipping these out. They will only be available at the expo and they are so cool And we're gonna rock those things all the way across Iowa. So again buy your shirts now team dozer 20 bucks Rag brie 50. It's a big deal


it. So a couple things, a couple house cleaning things that I want to talk about is number one, we've got a lot of great response from the free two-hour course that we're offering. So again if you don't already know about that at my investingclub.co.co we are offering a free two-hour webinar course for non-members. And the way that it's going to work is you have to reserve your spot, you have to register because there's limited seating every single week. Right? So we have a set number of people that we allow into the webinar every single week and the only way to get access is to register. And if you register and you're not going to make it to the webinar please cancel it so that you could give your spot to someone else that needs it. We've been getting a lot a lot of positive feedback from people who've seen the webinar. And as a bonus if you watch the whole webinar you will get access to a free 10-hour mini course but you have to watch till the very end. So that's at myinvestingclub.co. Number two is in the description of this video when I posted on to YouTube after it's done being live there's going to be a link to register to the San Jose Meetup. And the San Jose Meetup is going to be really cool because Bao's first student who made one million dollars on Fannie Mae and who's made eight million dollars overall who lives in the Turks and Caicos is coming to San Jose to visit and help us with the Meetup.  The one thing is that the event is free but there's a $20 ticket fee and that ticket fee gives you two drinks at the bar and this is kind of just to help the venue.  Let me see if there's anything else that I have to talk about. People are saying that YouTube live is not working. Can you guys see me? Just give me like a thumbs up or something if you can see me. I can see you. I can see you. Okay cool that's fine. All right so San Jose Meetup is going to be really really fun.


So, in the last few lectures we discussed the notion of compactness, we discussed of compactness. However, as we saw there is an important there are lots of important spaces which are not compact. However, note that several important spaces which are not compact for example, R n. These places are however, locally compact, locally compact which is the next property we shall study ok. So, let us define locally local compactness ok. So, let x be a topological space. So, we say x is locally compact if every point x in x has an open neighborhood u such that u closure is compact right. And example it is clear that is locally compact because we can take any point and we can take a disk of let us say it is one around it. So, the closure will be this closed disk and this is obviously closed and bounded in R n and therefore, it is compact right. And so, one of the main propositions a very useful proposition we are going to prove about locally compact spaces is the following. So, the following proposition is very useful x is locally compact if and only if for any pair x comma w where w is an open subset containing x we can find an open subset v such that x is in v which is contained v closure and v closure is contained in w v closure is compact. So, in other words given any x and given any open subset w which contains x we can find a neighborhood v of x such that v closure is compact. So, this is v closure ok. So, let us prove this it is clear that if this condition holds for any pair x comma w we can find v such that x belongs to v v closure is contained in w and v closure is compact then x is locally compact right. We simply apply this condition we simply apply this condition to the pair right. So, when we apply this condition to this pair we will get that there is an open subset u which contains x and u closure is obviously, going to be contained that inside it x and u closure is compact. So, this proves that. So, that is precisely the meaning of being locally compact. So, let us prove the converse let us assume x is locally compact ok. So, now recall the following assertion. So, which we have already seen before. So, let y contained in x be a compact subspace ok this is more general. So, consider the following more general assertion. So, let y contained in x be a compact subspace x be a point in x minus y then there are open sets subsets c and d y is contained in c x is contained in d and the intersection c and d are disjoint. So, let us see how to prove this. So, this is our x right and this is our y and this is our x right. So, for each point y in y we can find a neighborhood since x is host of we can find a neighborhood u sub y of x and v sub y of y such that u sub y containing x v sub y containing y such that u sub y intersected v sub y is empty right. So, cover. So, we can cover y as we can write it as a union of all these v sub y's right. As y is compact this implies there is a finite sub cover and then we let u be equal to the intersection of these u y sub j's. Each u y j contains x. So, this implies that x belongs to u, u is a finite intersection of open sets and therefore, it is open and right. So, it is not we can cover. So, y is contained in this sorry y is going to be contained in this and since y is compact and from what we had seen in one of the earlier lectures if we can put y into a collection of open subsets then we can find a finite sub collection of that collection such that y is contained in that. So, x belongs to u let us look at. So, let d be equal to u and let c be equal to this union j equal to 1 to n v y j's right. So, this v y j's could be something like this. So, then c contains y and d intersected c is equal to u intersected union j equal to 1 to n v y j this is equal to union j equal to 1 to n u intersected v y j, but this contained in union j equal to 1 to n u y j intersected v y j which is empty. So, this proves our general assertion which is something and we had seen the same proof before earlier as well. So, we will use this general fact ok. So, suppose now we return to the proof of our assertion. So, we are assuming that x is locally compact and we want to show that x has this property. So, suppose we are given where w is open and x is contained in w. As x is locally compact this implies there exists a neighborhood open subset such that u closure is compact. So, this is our x this is w and let us say u closure is this. So, consider the closed subset y defined as u closure minus w. So, u closure I will write it as minus w, but this same as u closure intersected with x minus w. W is open. So, x minus w is closed. So, this is and we are intersecting two closed subsets. So, that is a u closure is compact and compact subspace of a host of spaces closed and therefore, the intersection of these two is going to be closed. So, this closed subset it looks something like this right. So, from u closure we are removing w right. So, this region is y and x does not belong to y right. So, thus a closed subspace of a compact space since y is a closed subspace of u closure which is compact this implies that y is compact. So, thus using this general result that we proved yeah. So, thus there is there are open sets such that y is contained in c, x is contained in d and c intersection d is empty right. So, c could be some open set like this. So, c contains y right and d could be some open set like this. So, we can replace d by an open subset which is smaller than d as long as it contains x yeah. So, we may replace d intersection u right. So, u contains x. So, therefore, d intersection u also contains x and assume d is contained inside u. So, so, our set d is going to be contained inside u right.  So, now no point of y the closure because if y is a point in y then there is a neighborhood of y namely c such that c intersection d is empty right. So, this implies that y does not belong to the closure which implies the closure intersected y is. So, as the closure is contained inside u closure and the closure intersection y is empty this implies the closure is contained in u closure minus y and as y is equal to u closure minus w this implies that u closure minus y is equal to u closure intersection w which is equal which is contained in w right. So, thus we have found open set d such that x is in d, d closure is contained in w, d closure is compact ok. So, this completes. So, this proposition is very useful and this this set theoretic check is very easy and I will leave it to you as a simple exercise. So, ok. So, next we are going to talk about so compactifying locally compact spaces. So, note the space the open interval 0 1 is locally compact. So, that is clear because I mean if we take this interval 0 1 then given any point x we can find a small closed interval around x and we know that this closed interval is yeah homomorphic to 0 1 which we proved is compact right. Now, notice that it is contained. So, this interval 0 1 is contained as a dense open subset it is obviously contained in the interval 0 1 and also in s 1 right. So, to see this note that 0 1 is homomorphic to r and using the stereographic projection yeah r is homomorphic to s 1 minus this north pole. So, r is homomorphic to s 1 minus this north pole n. So, this implies that and this is embedded inside s 1. So, although we can compactify a locally compact topological space in many ways there is one compactification which is special among all these and which is now which is what we are going to explain now yeah. So, we want to compactify. So, thus they can be compactify a locally compact topological space. However, one particular compactification is very special we shall next describe that ok. So, we will do that in the next lecture. So, we will end this lecture here.


This systematic review examined the effectiveness of interventions aimed at promoting plant-based proteins from lower environmental footprint sources. It found that half of individual-level interventions targeting people with chronic diseases successfully reduced red slash processed meat intake in the short term. Additionally, most microenvironmental studies focused on increasing plant-based diet and dining facilities, resulting in positive dietary changes. This suggests a need for more research on how to effectively promote plant-based proteins from lower environmental footprint sources in the general population. This article was authored by Rimante Ronto, Gulsasa Burri, Gianna Maxi-Laila Robbers, and others.


What do you make of the sentiments by Deputy President Ruto, because he has missed other functions and this is one of them that he has also mentioned things to do with money being used illegally or wrongly. I think the fact that he did not attend the Naivasha meeting is not lost on us that he was not invited and people from his faction are not invited. But we saw excuses from the organizers of the meeting saying you know they are adhering to COVID protocols which is laughable because we know why some people, some quotas are not invited. I think in the history of constitutional making especially after 1997 Naivasha has become a mutilation venue. You have a very nice idea and document and then it is taken to Naivasha and it comes out as something else. So the kind of consensus that goes on in Naivasha is not consensus in the real definition of consensus. It's some negotiated arrangements by politicians. I want to fault the Deputy President in one thing that he is not maintaining consistency in terms of honesty. On one hand he is telling us that you know we will stop rege. This is not something that we will allow to pass through. On the other he is coming out soba and saying we must have consensus. So we know where he stands but sometimes he comes out and it appears as though he does not know where he stands. Because if you oppose this report then oppose it in its entirety. You do not come in when you are meeting certain quotas and then you begin saying but we need to have a consensus. We need to agree. I think I fault him on that. He is on both sides of this divide. But that said it is important that we build consensus around these issues. Because in as much as the BBI task force is saying it went around the country. If you look at the annex to the BBI report, this report that we are now discussing, you have about less than 400 people listed, individuals listed as having participated sent the emails and stuff like that. Then you have groups, individuals mostly comprised of politicians. If you remove groups that comprise of politicians then you have a very small demographic that actually participated in airing their views. And that is not to discount people who gave their views. What I think was missing was meaningful public participation. Not just holding a baraza where politicians are addressing the people and telling them this is what you need. I think meaningful public participation means that the people are coming up with solutions to their problems. Rather than the political class telling them by the way this is what you need. I think we turned it over its head. Now these senators before this particular in Naivasha before they went for this consensus meeting they were expressing concerns over the watering down of the powers of the Senate. And after meeting they are now saying something different. They have changed the song. If we could listen in to what Senator Urengo said after they had that meeting in Naivasha over the weekend. The Bridges initiative was one that went round the country seeking the view of all Kenyans which has culminated in the report that we now have. The report seeks to ensure that no one is left behind by creating shared prosperity. Shared prosperity means that all communities in Kenya from all corners have a share in the resources. One of the methods that this will be achieved is by increasing the minimum amount of shareable revenue to the counties from 15% to 35%. Ensuring that greater resources percolate to every corner of Kenya. Father it creates award development fund which will be sourced with 5% of shareable allocation. Youth are equally catered for under BBI. Our youth have a host of issues that have prevented them from achieving their full potential. The issues have hampered the youth and they are now faced with numerous problems that make their lives a bit of a misery. BBI the process called the building bridges initiative was one that went round the country seeking the view of all Kenyans which has culminated in the report that we now have. The report seeks to ensure that no one is left behind by creating shared prosperity. There are concerns raised to the power of this summit and now the 15% to 35% they haven't even told us how they will get to that who is going to find that. And Wangiko and Kini have been suffering what you stand on this. Two things. I want to see Nio Rengo. Honesty is the best policy. What do I mean? You're talking about the youth have faced challenges that he's named. I'll tell you for free. That photo you've seen there. That is the problem facing the youth. That photo. I'll tell you. That is the entire misery. The pain. The unemployment. Everything in one photo. They say a photo is 1000 words. That is it. Now shared prosperity. Laughable, right? Because why do you reduce Kenya into communities? When you're talking about leadership, it's a problem. We have politicians and all our leaders. When you're talking about leadership, why do you see me as A? Let's say Kikuyu and you as A. Let's say Lou. Why can't I see you as a Kenyan? Serve the people because we are Kenyans. Serve the people as citizens of Kenya. You see, that's what I'm saying. That is a problem that we're seeing right there. The issue like you just raised, they've changed their tone. That is because political parties in Kenya are owned by individuals. They are owned by individuals. We have Jubilee. We've seen the owner there. We have seen the owner of ODM there. And so they will be panel beaten to a certain tone. When you talk about this, they are saying every country will have two senators, a male and female. My question to them is, they are forgetting, but my question to them is one. What happens when it comes to voting? Remember, Senate votes via delegation. What happens when both senators are not on the same side? That is a question they should answer. I think just in addition to what he said, first I should mention that the owner of Jubilee was not present. That was the caretaker. I think the owners have been speaking behind the scenes. We were talking about the issue of a Senate that has been watered down. If we adopt the kind of structure that is being proposed where the executive is in comity with parliament, where the executive sits in parliament and parliament sits in the executive, then most functions that are currently under the National Assembly should move to Senate. Because Senate as presently structured is already watered down. It happened in Naivash again coincidentally. But for us to go the way we are proposing to go, we must have Senate as an upper house. It happens across the world where we have a bicameral parliament. I think that is something that we must consider. That Senate must be an upper house. It must be given more roles because now you would have a National Assembly that is not really playing oversight. But is working towards government agenda. So that is something that must be addressed. But I must also fold Senate for this, that even with the little authority and roles that they have been given under the current constitution, they have not really performed their best. We have seen committees of Senate, for example when they are grilling governors, they are playing politics and playing card games with governors. Yet they are supposed to be very decisive and to take very stern action against such individuals. So I think Senate has failed in that manner. But that said, we must also improve Senate. And as we talk about the youth, it is disappointing that senior Rengo is saying that the youth are covered under BBI. Recently asked a colleague of mine to pinpoint where the youth are covered under BBI, where the youth are benefiting. And if we go systematically, and I'm glad my colleague has mentioned that these things that are being sold to the youth so that the youth buy into BBI are things that the Jubilee government has failed to do. When you talk about help, it doesn't even have to do with amending the help act. It has to do with policy. And in addition to what he has said, I have friends, in fact this afternoon was talking to a colleague of mine who is now practising as an advocate. But at the time that he was not, he actually wrote to help. And since that time, to the time he started making remittances to help, he was not queried about paying back his loan. So this is a policy issue. It does not even have to do with statutory amendment. That is one, two, when you are talking about the youth being covered in terms of, and Nudin has mentioned this, in terms of tax holiday, the people who will benefit most are not the youth, because we have seen in tenders across board where you have individuals who are benefiting through youth. So you have an individual who is perhaps 60 years old, a politician somewhere who uses a youth to register a company, and then that company is used to obtain a tender, and then they are paid. So in that case then, when you grant tax holiday, there are some issues that are impracticable. They may appear flowery and selling it to certain sections of our society, but then they are impracticable. So I do not think that the youth are covered anywhere. In any case, the current constitution covers the youth more than what the BBI proposes.


So I'll call to order the Monday, October 21st meeting of the Arlington Redevelopment Board recorded by ACMI. Thank you for coming out tonight for what's going to be a brief meeting, I think, hope. First up, we have the Housing Corporation of Arlington represented by Pam Hallett, Pam, come on up. Pam is seeking an extension to the special permit request on dockets number 3519 and 3520. We're not reopening the special permit hearing or public comment tonight. This is just a request for an extension. I don't want you to speak, but given everything that each of you does for the town, I'm inclined to recommend that we approve that. Thank you, thank you. I'm Pam Hallett with the Housing Corporation of Arlington. We are into our closing phase, but one never knows. And we looked at the date that these expire and it's early December. And I thought, wouldn't that be horrible if we get to the final week in November and we could be inching over that first week in December for closing? And I would have to, at that point, be panic-stricken and have to come back and delay closing to get the extension. So we really are doing this as a way to prevent me from having to panic and as a way to prevent just sort of putting off the closing for another week or two to wrap this up. We also need the permit in order to close and we're not gonna be able to get the permit if it's about to expire or it expires. I know Mike well enough to say that he will say, it's expired, Pam, you gotta go get it extended. So we've asked it to be extended. Aaron and Jenny and I talked about how long it could be a month, but why don't we just say six months just to say it? And so it's done and we don't have to worry about it. That's really why I'm here. Okay, great, questions? Go ahead, David. You go first, I'll handle this one first. Well I'm also, as you know, very supportive of the project and I know you've been working diligently to secure your financing and that it's a complicated project with complicated financing and these things take time. I just wanna make sure that we do this correctly procedurally and I haven't been involved in one where we've had to extend a special permit previously so this is new to me and I was looking at the zoning bylaw 3.3.5B which relates to this. And it does talk about granting extensions for good cause and I just wasn't clear exactly what that means. Is there a standard that we have to consider or can we just make a decision that there's good cause and grant the extension? I've had a conversation with Jean about this briefly. And we're going to be getting into it. Is that also your question, Jean? Something similar? When we were doing recrudification, as you know, a lot of the things, these citations in the zoning bylaw are directly from 4DA. They're just sort of a restating of what's in Mass General Law. However, in this particular case, there's not exactly a clear understanding of what good cause means. It's actually in quotes. So I think that there would be a bad reason to do something. If there might be something bad that is happening with a site perhaps and maybe there's a reason that a city or town would not want to extend a special permit for certain, for other reasons, there's not a particular standard nor is it required for you to have for the applicant or the petitioner, in this case, to request us to make a determination or have any sort of determination of what exactly constitutes a good cause. So in this case, it's simply, she's returning to the Special Permit Granting Authority and in this case, it's the ARB, not the ZBA, but it could also happen with the ZBA. And respectfully requesting that the time be extended based upon the circumstances that have been presented to you this evening and also in the letter or letters that have been provided. Beyond that, you could ask additional questions if you have concerns or other thoughts about what will happen between now and the time that things are permitted or what happened since the time that the permit was actually granted. I think that might be the bigger question. So. Can I sort of weigh in a little bit? Yep, go ahead. And so has also been exploring this. I looked up 40A to see if it shed any light on this and it has the exact same wording. Word for word, the same wording which is okay because it's nice when our bylaws track it exactly even if it's vague. So it sort of seems to me, and I don't know and I didn't have a chance to do more research but it sort of seems to me that I'd be interested in what was the good cause for having to come back. You know, what prevented you from having used the permit already and completed the project. So I would like us to have on the record what is the good cause for that? And second is what is the good cause for needing the extra six months? So it's two different good causes. Good cause for not having completed within three years and good cause for needing the extra six months. Your letter described why you need the extra six months which is fine and I think adding more affordable housing is a definite good cause in Arlington but what we don't have on the record, what I'd like to hear is the good cause of why. It took three years to get here. Yes, exactly. So unfortunately the way affordable housing is funded, you have to have all of your zoning in place to even apply to the state. So we had to do that which is why we got it three years ago. We then applied and with the kind of deluge of applications that go in, the first one was turned down because 84 other organizations put in applications. They only had enough to fund 29 and so they had not seen ours before so we automatically got kicked out. That's sort of how they do things. First time through, you don't get funded. Second time, we went in and we were very close but we didn't get in within those under 30 groups. It was very close and I pulled together an entire conversation of all the lenders with the town and Malden redevelopment because honestly the state said the first time, I don't believe that there's $3 million that's committed locally. I don't believe that Pam.  So second round, I pulled together an entire conference call and even at that point they said to Ben Alora Wiener, Laura, I want that on writing from the town, the manager, town manager. Alora was like, okay, fine. They're like, what? They really didn't believe because towns don't typically support the applications to this kind of amazing amount of money. And so when we finally got there, now they're all so excited and every information session I go to, they go and Arlington now goes $3 million.  So that's good for us but it took us a long time to get there because they didn't believe it. So how did taking, what is it, two extra years to get the funding? Was that what it was? Well, they only have one round a year. So you go in the first round, you get kicked out. You go in the second round, you get kicked out. You go in the third round and you get it. So it took you three years to get the funding and that's the good cause for needing an extended line you didn't have to. Get it done within three years. And without the state funding, the project would not have happened. Oh, absolutely not, right? We needed the 9% low income housing tax credits and the investors in, yeah. Okay. I don't know the rest of you, and it sounds like a good cause to me. Do you agree? I agree. Seeing that there are no other questions, so there are, I think I would move to approve the extension of special permit, number 3519 Arlington for six months from December 5th, 2019. The extension of the special permit. Yeah. So move. Second. All in favor. Aye. Aye. And then I would move that special permit, number 3520 for 117 Broadway, be extended for six months from December 1st, 2019. So motioned. Second. All in favor. Aye. Aye. All set. Thank you all very much. All right. And Jean, if you would like to see our closing checklist, I'd be happy to share. No. I don't doubt what you said, I just think we needed to hear. Oh, I have no problem at all. Thank you very much. Thank you, ma'am. All right. Any members of the public wish to be heard in open forum? I guess that would be me. Yeah. Go ahead. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Sir Erding Street. I just have a few comments about the board meeting the last one, two weeks ago. I thought it was a very good meeting. We had a lot of people talking about housing situation from different viewpoints. Our town manager spoke of it as a first step in broader community involvement going forward. And I think most of the people who left that meeting had a very good feeling about it. And fortunately that didn't last very long, less than 24 hours. The first action of the next step forward turned out to be killing off the residential study group the very next day. I'm extremely disappointed in those town officials who took this ill-considered unilateral action. And I think it was taking two steps back from where we were. Thank you. Thank you. Any other comments, business to attend to? Just one quick thing. I circulated in a flyer format. We've been working with a MIT practicum student group who have been looking at Broadway as in Broadway from the Somerville border to a little past Warren Street. And they're going to be having a community planning workshop on October 28th next Monday at the Hardy School at seven. They're also going to be coming to the redevelopment board meeting on December 4th to share their final presentation with you. So we'll have that scheduled. But if anybody is available to attend this preliminary presentation and then also a sort of workshop so people can actually provide some feedback to the students, that would be very welcomed. Yeah, I'd like to go. Good, I hope to see you there. And we're hoping that ACMI is going to record it, but still working on those details. There's a lot of meetings happening that evening, unfortunately, we had actually really hoped to be at Thompson School, that would have been ideal, and then the Fox Library, but there's just a lot of competing things, including precinct meetings and all sorts of stuff. Students have a finite semester, and once you plan a date on their calendar, it's pretty hard to walk back from that. We did actually try to, but it's proven to be challenging, so we decided to keep the date. I may be able to attend that. Great. Yeah, let me tell you. Thanks. Well, it'll be a posted meeting, so. So we all go home. No worries, however many of you want to attend. Yeah, I'll attend without having to do this. Okay, so any other comments, questions, concerns, anything? What's coming up for the next couple of meetings? The next meeting is November 4th, and CVS is coming back, because that was the date that we continued it to. I think we are going to announce the release of the bike parking guide, save any lingering comments that we are still getting from a couple of people. I'm looking at it. Including David. And then I think I have a couple of other things list lined up on the agenda that I'm not remembering offhand, but primarily CVS is coming back. And then November 19th, I think is the meeting after that. That one will involve another, a newer hearing. There's two hearings, I believe, that evening. So. 18th. 18th, sorry. That hotel is not coming back till. December 21st, or sorry, I don't have my calendar with me, but the second meeting in December, December 16th. 16th. It's a good thing that I don't have to remember these days. No, they are posted meetings. So. Okay. Okay. Good. And December 4th is when the students will be here. Motion to adjourn. Second. All in favor. Aye. Aye.


To conclude the bedtime routine, play them a children's meditation to help calm the mind. It could encourage the child to imagine a favorite place, count breaths, or focus on calming sensations which would allow them to sleep better. If you are looking for a way to enhance your child's bedtime routine and provide them with a sense of calm, then you need to explore our chi-coil PEMF technology. Just like the soothing children's meditation mentioned earlier, the frequencies produced by the chi-coils are crafted to promote relaxation. If you find any of these tips helpful, let us know in the comment section. Like and follow for more.


So far in this series, we have developed quantum field theories for the electron in a hydrogen atom and for photons in the radiation field. To combine these, we need a description of how these fields interact. This should take the form of an interaction Hamiltonian, H-hat interaction. To find this, we will consider the interaction between a charged particle and the electromagnetic field, as described by classical electrodynamics. To do this requires us to apply the methods of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. In this slide, we will look at a very brief overview of this formalism. For motivation, we will consider the simple problem of a mass falling in a gravitational field. Let q be the height of the mass above the ground. q dot, the time rate of change of q, is the upward velocity, and gravity pulls downward with a constant force F. Newton's law, mass times acceleration equals force, becomes mq double dot equals minus mg. Where m is the mass, q double dot is the upward acceleration, and g is the gravitational acceleration. In Lagrangian mechanics, we generate expressions for the kinetic energy k and the potential energy u. k equals one-half mass times velocity squared, one-half q dot squared. u equals mgq, force times height above the ground. Then, we form the function l equals k minus u, called the Lagrangian. The equation of motion is then given by the Euler-Lagrange equation. The time derivative of the derivative of l with respect to velocity equals the derivative of l with respect to position. l depends on q through the term minus mgq. So the derivative of l with respect to q is minus mg, the right side of Newton's equation. l depends on q dot through the term one-half mq dot squared. So the derivative of l with respect to q dot is mq dot, and the time derivative of that is mq double dot, the left side of Newton's law. Lagrangian mechanics does not introduce any new physics. It is simply an alternate mathematical formulation of Newtonian mechanics. Our example problem is so simple that Lagrangian mechanics is redundant. We can simply form and solve the Newtonian equations directly. However, in more complicated problems, especially those with many variables in complex geometries, it can be very difficult to develop and solve the Newtonian equations. But, very often it is much simpler to write the expressions for the kinetic and potential energies, and form the Lagrangian and evaluate and solve the Euler Lagrange equations. In Hamiltonian mechanics, we denote by p, the derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to velocity, and call this the conjugate momentum. For our example problem, this is simply mq dot, the mechanical momentum of the particle. We solve for q dot equals p over m, and form the Hamiltonian, h equals pq dot minus the Lagrangian. We substitute for q dot in terms of p to arrive in an expression for h in terms of p and q, p squared over 2m plus mgq. This is the kinetic energy plus the potential energy, which is the total energy. The Hamiltonian equations of motion are q dot equals the derivative of h with respect to p. In our example, this is q dot equals p over m, and p dot equals minus the derivative of h with respect to q. p dot is mq double dot, and minus the derivative of h with respect to q is minus mg. So again, we arrive at the Newtonian equation mq double dot equals minus mg. The Hamiltonian plays a central role in quantum mechanics. In our application so far, throughout the quantum mechanics series, and up to this point in the quantum field series, we could write down the Hamiltonian by inspection. But for a charged particle interacting with an electromagnetic field, it is not obvious how to do this. We need to work through the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism to discover the form the Hamiltonian takes for this problem. So let's do that. We have a point particle with charge q at position x, with velocity v equals x dot, and electric and magnetic fields e and b. The electric force, Fe, is parallel to the electric field. The magnetic force, Fm, is perpendicular to both the magnetic field and the velocity. As we discussed in video three of this series, the total force on the charge is q times the quantity e plus v cross b. Writing mass times acceleration, mx double dot, equals this force, gives us the equation of motion. Here, x boldface is the vector position with components x, y, and z. Let's look at the first component of this vector equation. mx double dot equals q times quantity ex plus y dot bz minus z dot by. In video three, we show that the electric and magnetic fields can be derived from a single vector potential a. e equals minus time derivative of a, and b equals curl of a. From these relations, ex equals minus ax comma t, where the comma t notation is a shorthand for the time derivative. By equals ax comma z minus az comma x, and bz equals ay comma x minus ax comma y. Therefore, the first component of our equation of motion can be written d by dt of mx dot equals minus q ax comma t.  Here's that expression again. We want to get this into the Lagrangian equation of motion form. d by dt of derivative of l with respect to x dot equals derivative of l with respect to x. The left side has the correct form, but on the right there are three terms that are derivatives of coordinates other than x. To fix this, let's consider d by dt of ax. This equals ax comma t plus ax comma xx dot plus ax comma y, y dot, plus ax comma z, z dot. A subtle point here is that this expression has two types of time derivatives, d by dt ax and ax comma t. The first is the total derivative of ax with respect to time, and the second is the partial derivative of ax with respect to time. The left side represents how the ax value seen by the particle changes with time. The four terms on the right represent different ways this can happen. First, at a fixed point in space, ax can be changing with time. That's the ax comma t term. The partial derivative of ax with respect to t, assuming no change in the spatial coordinates. Another way the particle can see ax changing with time is if ax changes in space and the particle moves through space. Those are the last three terms. ax comma x represents how fast ax changes with the x-coordinate, and x dot represents how fast the particle's x-coordinate is changing with time, and similarly for the next two terms. We solve this equation for ax comma t and substitute into the top equation. This gives us d by dt of mx dot equals q times, in parentheses, all for expression for ax comma t, plus the remaining terms from the right side of the top equation. We will combine the d by dt terms and put them on the left side. We also see that four of the terms on the right sum to zero.  Here's that expression again. This has the form of the Euler Lagrange equation of motion. On the left we have d by dt of an expression we can interpret as the derivative of l with respect to x dot, and the right side can be interpreted as the derivative of l with respect to x. Identifying the derivative of l with respect to x dot as mx dot plus qax, and denoting this as the conjugate momentum px, we can solve for x dot equals px minus qax over m.  For the derivative of l with respect to x dot, the one-half mx dot squared term gives us mx dot and the qx dot ax term gives us qax. And the derivative of l with respect to x gives us the required right-hand side of the equation of motion. Given l, we can form the Hamiltonian. h equals px x dot plus py y dot plus pz z dot minus l. Let's look at the x dot terms. For px x dot, we substitute for x dot or above expression in terms of px and ax. Minus l gives us a minus one-half mx dot squared term into which we substitute for x dot and a minus qax x dot term into which we also substitute for x dot. After a bit of algebra, we end up with quantity px minus qax squared over 2m. In addition to this, h will have corresponding terms in py ay and pz az. For a free particle, the Hamiltonian is h par equals p squared over 2m. Our derivation shows that if the particle has charged q and an electromagnetic field a as present, then the Hamiltonian becomes quantity p minus qa squared over 2m. This represents the sum of the particle and interaction Hamiltonians. If the particle moves in a potential u, the resulting Hamiltonian due to the charged field interaction is the same with the addition of a u term. Let's expand this expression. We have 1 over 2m times a sum of three terms, quantity px minus qax squared, etc. plus the potential u.  We identify the first two terms as the original particle Hamiltonian. The remaining terms are therefore the interaction Hamiltonian. This interaction Hamiltonian is the expression we have been seeking that when added to our separate electron and photon quantum field theories will give us our desired single interacting theory.