While everybody is panicking, there are a lot of good lessons here for how to improve your life and also how to deal with this kind of situation in the future. Now, I think the biggest lesson here above everything and the biggest lesson for how to act and what to do during this pandemic is one thing. The lesson is how to deal with fear. Hey guys, Alex Hine, author of the book, Master the Day. So the first link in the description, I've included a free journaling worksheet and you're also going to get an email every three or so days on how to use journaling to kind of conquer your inner state to build a really amazing life. You can check it out right there below. So the first lesson we're really learning here is that people's outward responses are a response or a reflection of their inner state. Now you may know someone that is already a worry-wirt, an anxious type, or maybe someone whose life is always in a state of breakdown and they're always having some drama. Well, those people, of course, have 10 times the worries and the drama now. So a person internally anxious now demonstrates that externally. They're reading the news all the time. They're sharing all these things. They're freaking out in what they're buying in the markets. Internal anxiety, internal worry, internal fear and insecurity now is reflected 10x. You may have friends that are naturally secure, calm people. Maybe they're not too stirred up either way in general by life and now you see a deeper reflection of that. They're still about the same. Not too worried, not taking too many precautions. They're kind of still in the middle and maybe you have a friend that's like the brave type. Always the hero, always the savior, always the warrior and they're going to go out on their mission to do these things. They're going to demonstrate abnormal courage or abnormal stupidity. And maybe you know those people now too and they're traveling whatever they're doing. People's inner state is now being reflected outward times 10. For me, big lesson number one is to observe that, but then also observe not to make decisions from fear and anxiety. For me in my own journey to improve myself and kind of reach that 10x life in every quadrant, the number one thing that I noticed was that if I took advice from people, the average person on how to build an exceptional life, I never would have achieved anything that I've done.  They're afraid because they have no friends. They're afraid because that's their only source of support. Is that the right reason to be in a relationship? Hell no. Look at the amount of people that never go after their passion or what they love or what really excites them in life because the fear of how am I going to pay my rent? What if it doesn't work out? What if I look stupid? Do I have what it takes? All those reasons are due to fear. So I just did the exact opposite. And look how many people want to travel the world and have these unique experiences that only a select few have. And they don't because of fear. This country is so scary. What if I just like I'm just worried and I don't have enough money and how am I going to get the time off?  And most humans live their entire lives not dictated by what they want to do but by the things they're afraid of that keep them in the box. Now I think the third lesson here is one of the biggest success and fulfillment hacks is doing the opposite of what you see everyone doing. Like I said you know when I first talked to people about wanting to write a book what is everyone's response? Oh wow that's a big undertaking. Oh do you have a publisher? You're going to find a publisher? I mean that is how you're going to write 120,000 words.  And so I heard everyone say ah meh meh meh. So I said screw that. I'm going to do the opposite of what everyone does. And now I have self published books that have sold more and had more impact and made me more money than 99.9% of self published books. And I'm not that special. It's because I ignored the masses. When people say oh like I was 21 I wanted to go meditate in the Sahara Desert on a vision quest.  I said screw that. I went on it anyway was one of the most impactful memorable trips of my entire life.  But for me the lesson here is you observe the collective panic the collective fear how most humans live. Coronavirus is just an expression of what's always been there underneath it all. And of course there is some reason for genuine panic and genuine worry and precautions more than panic. But really it's just another manifestation of the low level of fear and anxiety humans always are dealing with. And their lives reflect the small lives of humans who cave to fear rather than that powerful inspirational excitement of someone who can defy the norm and build something incredible. Now to help you kind of stay in this positive state I'm going to be releasing some content ideally daily if I can swing it on 5 to 10 videos on really how to deal with what's going on now. And really from the perspective of not talking about coronavirus or health or anything like that but focusing on how to still have that 10x expression of your life in every domain while the chaos is going on. So stay tuned over the next coming week two weeks three weeks four weeks however long this goes on. And again check out the first link below for the journaling it's just like a little white paper to work on and you'll get some weekly journaling exercises to help you stay focused amidst everything going on. So check it out down there below and then my last related videos right on over here.


Hi guys, how you doing? This is Rich from Mississippi Live, and I think Aurora cannabis is entering a buy zone it's now at $9.85 and Analyst rating right now is a moderate buy and it's so close to a strong buy now the reason why I think that a Aurora cannabis is entering a buy zone is they have mentioned that they will be profitable in Q4 of 2019 if that holds true that will be the first time ever in the history of Aurora cannabis that they've actually shown a profit I Believe Aurora cannabis is oversold. I think it's undervalued under appreciated it's ranked number 52 out of 86 companies in medical products and I believe this is a company that has enormous upside because of the fact that they are international because of the fact that they have all the right partnerships and Because of the fact that edibles legalization is coming because they're about to be profitable. I think that Aurora is a buy Okay, now remember rich TV live is strictly for education entertainment purposes Always do your due diligence always do your research before you invest anything that we talk about here rich TV live, okay? there's a lot of Catalysts that are coming along the way So it could still go a little bit lower. Don't forget. We've seen Aurora twice go to $5 But in my humble opinion, I Believe that Aurora is approaching a buy now we look at the three-year chart You can see that Aurora has had some huge moves Specifically, let's take a look in the last two years actually So over the last two years you can see that they've had a couple times that they've gone down Dramatically so April sorry August 14 2018 last summer they hit 534 So be careful we could see them tumble lower But the upside I believe it to be tremendous because look it hit 534 August 14 and then on October 15th two days before legalization It hit 1507 That's almost a 200% Jump in two months So this industry is highly volatile and you're gonna see big moves up and down then in January It hit 668 before it exploded all the way up to 1322 on March 19th now we're seeing a consolidate again All the way down in 994 and it seems to go every time it gets below that $10 region And it gets around $9. It seems to have a balance It could get down to $8. It might even get a little bit lower I'm not suggesting you buy it today But I see the upside being tremendous in Aurora cannabis and I believe with all the catalysts coming them being profitable Edibles legalization The entire sector growing year over year. I believe Aurora cannabis and revenues growing quarterly sales growing I believe that's enough catalysts to see Aurora cannabis go back to that $15 range and beyond Okay, remember this is rich TV live if you're not winning you're not watching we bring you the winners and we bring them to you first I believe Aurora cannabis is undervalued underappreciated under exposed. It may go lower I'm not suggesting you buy it today. I think it could still go lower because we still have another Usually brutal month of July in the summertime and typically August too So we still have two potentially bad months But last year last July is when we saw the beginning of the resurrection now remember I just showed you Aurora cannabis had a very tough July and Hit a bottom in August so we may see a similar thing happen here So we may see it go lower But at the same time I won't be surprised to see it go above $10 11 and in that 13 to $15 range in the year And definitely in the distant future. This is your boy rich from which to be live bring you technical analysis of Aurora cannabis I believe it is moving into a buy zone and Hopefully it will be there soon Thank you for watching is your boy rich from which to be live if you like this video smash the like button Comment down below share the video everywhere if you want to stay connected You can see all of our social media feeds right there And you can go and learn about all these stocks and do all your due diligence at WWW.RichTVLive.com. Thank you very much for watching. It's your boy rich. You're not winning. You're not watching Bring your winners. I'll bring them to you first. I'm out.


All right, hello and welcome to this project briefing on social annotation across content hypothesis and JSTOR a case study I'm Jeremy Dean for my hypothesis we build social annotation or social reading technology And I'm VP of education which means I oversee our education products and services This is my first time at C&I and I'm thrilled to be here. I'm here Thanks today to my longtime colleague and collaborator Alex Humphries from Ithaca JSTOR where he is VP of innovation They are of course C&I member organization and it was really his idea to share this project We've been working on with this community and like I said, I'm excited to do so and we're joined here Also by Laysha Palin who is really the rock star of the panel. Sorry Alex Distinguished professor of information science at CU Boulder Laysha's a rock star because she's a computer scientist and information scientist So I think she's got things very relevant to this community And she's also one of the most enthusiastic and innovative users of our tool hypothesis in the classroom And she was able to join us coming down from from Boulder today. So down is it down? Boulder's north I think So brief look at the agenda I'm gonna offer Introduction to what hypothesis is and some might not be some of you might not be familiar Laysha will give the pedagogical perspective and discuss how she's used hypothesis in her courses and Alex will discuss Why this matters to JSTOR and maybe why this matters to many in the audience who are in the in the business of libraries and working with libraries? And share details of the pilot project that we've been working on and then we'll provide you all then we'll provoke you all in a Discussion on how we might scale the project that we'll share today So hypothesis was founded by Dan Whaley who sit in the audience. Maybe you can wave his hand Dan saw a problem with information on the web He recognized that much of this kind of the content on the web did not provide space for discussion and Where comments were enabled? It wasn't particularly healthy discussion and on the other hand He saw the emergence of social networks that could be powerful places for people to engage in discussion But themselves could be unhealthy in part because they were separate from the context in which they were engaged But simply content and conversation were disconnected so he founded hypothesis and This is our mission To build new infrastructure connecting the connecting the world's people and ideas over every web page and document on every platform like Google Docs But everywhere and our solution is a standards-based open-source framework that enables diverse collaborative services Wherever you are all based on a new unit of speech the annotation Now I'm an English professor so I would quibble with it as a new unit of speech But I think it is being used powerfully in a new context and that's really what excited me about joining hypothesis originally When I taught I always emphasized annotation in my courses because I knew that reading closely and thinking and writing about the reading was critical to my student's success But I also believe that those skills and practices are critical to a healthy democratic society more broadly That the idea is that instead of sharing a web page or a document You can share a link to a piece of content within that resource along with your commentary as a former hypothesis colleague has Described it if the web is an information fabric web annotation increases the thread count of that fabric And of course we all want higher thread count sheets, right? One of the critical things that we recognized early on was that if this was going to be done right the infrastructure was key This functionality could not be proprietary so high hypothesis was open source from the start And it had to be interoperable so early on we advocated for and led it initiative to make annotation of web standard through the W3C And this is what it might look like a single place to access and organize your notes as you explore the web and other resources a Single space to engage in conversation and community building across that content There are wide ranges a wide range of use cases that hypothesis is already enabled through our technology There is of course the everyday internet citizens and how they engage with content and with each other online There's how scholars engage with the information that is on the web For example the climate feedback group is a collection of climatologists who use hypothesis to comment on popular journalistic coverage of climate change Sometimes provoking retractions through their work There is scholarly publishing itself from bio archive using hypothesis for feedback on pre prints to the journal elife using Hypothesis in peer review to a wide range of journals using hypothesis for community engagement post publication And then there is the classroom context, which will be our focus today the value proposition is Three way for students teachers in schools overall for students The tool makes learning fun and provides them note taking and discussion functionality everywhere. They go for teachers and engages the students So they can see that they've done the reading and know where they're struggling and For schools this can improve retention and we can provide rich data on this fundamental activity that is reading for classes a Key thing that we did when we started building out for education was to integrate in the learning management system for those in the libraries I don't know how much you're Interacting with the learning management systems, but the LMS is the everyday hub for students and teachers It's where rosters are added by the registrar teachers enter grades there students submit assignments and tools like hypothesis can integrate through The learning tool interoperability standard so that students and teachers can access tools like hypothesis without having to log in Hypothesis now works with over 300 institutions of higher education largely North America I know many of these schools are represented in the attendees today We largely work with digital learning offices and centers for teaching and learning But I think there's a real opportunity for us to work more closely with many of you here who work out of the libraries I Want to close by sharing the results of a study we conducted last spring at University, Minnesota in a freshman composition course If you can see it this show this shows engagement data with course materials over the duration of a term The red is from the sections not using hypothesis The green is from the courses using hypothesis And what we're seeing is that the students using hypothesis are more engaged with the content over time Accessing it more frequently as the data here shows. I Think every teacher and everyone involved in storing reading materials for courses like those in libraries We want to see this kind of sustained engagement with the content But for more on what hypothesis social orientation looks like in the classroom. I'm going to hand it to Laysha Thanks, Jeremy. Hey, everybody. I'm Laysha Palin. I'm really glad to be here from the University of Colorado This seems like a really exciting conference, and I'm glad to be able to talk about The way we've been using hypothesis in the classroom. It's been a real transformative Experience for me as an instructor 25 years of instruction, but in this last year and a half. I feel like I've done In improved leaps and bounds in my own pedagogical practice with students and that the students themselves are also telling me that they're having a Very different kind of experience in my classroom and to me I think it's because of what I'm able to do with readings assigned readings difficult readings With hypothesis as a support for me and for them. So I'd like to tell you a little bit about What we're doing and what I'm doing the first thing I might want to just make sure you're all aware of Or maybe recall your own college experience, which is that most students don't do the readings That they're assigned and if you don't want to admit that I'll at least admit that even as somebody who eventually became a professor I myself did not always do the readings that I was assigned in the classroom And what a loss that was because I ended up having to reread all of them anyway to move into my perfect my position as a professor and so What the only you know the ways we can reinforce that is to one not reinforce it and just Regurgitate the material in the classroom the next time therefore Disincentivizing the students who actually did do the work We can cold call a student just to embarrass them and hopefully next time They'll read the reading if they didn't do the reading We can give pop quizzes and all these are very kind of Confrontational ways of engaging with students in the material Which is not what you want in a classroom where you're trying to bring people along for 15 weeks Ideally in a learning community if you can at least if you can create that and you can't create a community when you're in this kind of This kind of relationship where you're testing They're they're they're reading and their commitment to the material and so when students don't read it really drives the The content of the course what can be done in the course in the classroom to the lowest common denominator And so the opportunity we have today with the state-of-the-art with these Hypertext support technologies with hypothesis in particular is to move readings from this peripheral thing that we assign and Can't quite depend on as instructors So something that becomes a centerpiece around which we can have elaborate discussions and springboard New that our projects and other related work that we do because we know everyone has read the reading And so yes So my point is that the readings as you'll see in an example is that they become sites for peer-to-peer interaction and for my Individual interaction with students and it really creates a much more customized experience for students even in a fairly large classroom when I can't Speak to everyone every single time with every single reading I get to every student a couple times over the course of the semester and so they feel that my involvement is Right alongside them in that reading All right, and so what I'm going to show you now is after An example from a sophomore class I taught last semester It was a sophomore level class 2000 level class, but it had mostly freshmen and sophomores in it And we had to engage with some really difficult material It's we're in a new department of information science Many of you might know what that is but many people others do not and there aren't textbooks really for information science And so we rely on the research literature to teach students important things around methods And the philosophies of information science And so this class is called information ecosystems and it teaches about the social life of information Which itself is sort of a heady kind of topic and so we're really asking students to deal with abstract concepts right away and And so the one example I want to show you today is a demo from A paper that they were assigned that had just been published or was about to be published I'm a co-author on it, but we were getting into some very difficult issues around disinformation and the rise of disinformation during the COVID pandemic as it related to Vaccine resistance and as it was tied to medical racism So I just said four very you know big ideas that are all tied together in this paper the looking at large-scale social media records to Show students how these how these things come together and how they might want to research them so let me So I think I have to Exit to get out of this you and get into my demo of you here Okay, great. Thank you. All right, let me just Launch this so I'm not going to give you a full-blown demo of hypothesis But this is the real live reading that we had in class and I want to show you first just the extent of this Research paper its length and I remember giving this to sophomores its length and its mix of methods Which are both quantitative and qualitative in this paper? They're encountering the Tuskegee Syphilis study, which is the first time many of them have encountered this So we have to establish what medical racism is and then we have to establish how it's being re or co-opted Once again in some complex argumentation around the COVID-19 vaccine distribution So I just want to show you the I'm just scanning through just to show you the range of this is qualitative Interpretivist work that they're reading about here, and then they actually get down to network Network graphs that show how different groups are communicating with each other So it's a large it's a big range of material and then what you see over here on the right are the students annotations and I'm going to specifically show you How they respond to my prompts and a little bit about how I've developed my pedagogy here Just to show you what how powerful this can be so here you see all my Annotations that I've made and I have two types one is a guidance annotation which Gives students I landmark things for them and give them background that if I could be with them one-on-one in a much smaller group I might say hey, you might not understand this phrase. This is what this means if you want to learn more about this go here This is a really difficult piece. This is the big point skim over that and don't struggle there I want you to focus on something else So those are that's the guidance so they feel supported and coached when they're tackling a big paper And then I give them prompts and the prompts they have to answer and the prompts are a range of pretty difficult Questions that ask them to reflect on what the reading means It asks them to summarize what different parts of the reading says It asks them to respond in their own personal experience And so I do a whole mix of things and for a paper of this size about 30 pages I have about 25 annotations throughout prompts throughout and the reason I say that is is that by having the annotations throughout They actually have to read the whole paper rather than just skip from one annotation to another Which they'll do if you only put in three and I learned that lesson So the trick is if you get them to read the whole paper They're at first a little bit resentful of professor Palin, but then after that very first reading They get through the whole paper and these are students who are Hearing I mean, you know, they're in such pain right now. They're experiencing all these things in the world around With what we're experiencing they they're looking for careers information science sounds like something that might help them solve All these problems, but even for them. It's a hard thing to define by the time they get to the end of this paper They have said to me professor Palin I finally understand information silence science and I see how all these things come together and it's Wonderful because they've read each piece of the paper. So it's not just getting them to read it's getting them to read slowly and Reflexively and start knitting things together and not being afraid to ask questions So just as an example in this class. I had 47 students by the time they got to this reading so here's a first prompt and 44 of all students are applying to these prompts throughout Okay, they're reading the paper you go down to some next prompts which I'll get to real quick and then close up They are so you can see they're annotating really extensively and Right and so the the amount of writing they put into this is similar to what they would do if they had to write a one or two page Summary of what the paper is about but it's just much more extensive so I'm going to close there on that and then go back to the presentation and close out with a few of The the lessons so I've experienced this wild success by create using By using hypothesis as a way to coach them outside the classroom so that when they come back to the classroom They they report feeling these things because they've read they feel this personal pride They're ready for a class like they've never been ready before a class before they feel cared for they talk about that Because they're getting what they crave. They just don't know how to read or why it's valuable And they're starting to even understand why it's important to be self-disciplined about things like reading at a at a young age In their college experience, which is just great and so The one thing I want to close on is this point It's not just that each individual person is reading and that I might be responding to them and saying oh, that was a really interesting Comment you made Joe It's that they all walk into the classroom on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 12 30 And every they know that everybody in the room read the paper Not just themselves, but that everybody read it and that I read all of their annotations And so what that means is our conversation starts after everyone has done the reading and I Pull out certain things that seemed especially potent And we talk about those things and then apply it to whatever project we're doing information science project We're doing in the class so I can offload lots of things to outside the classroom But the feeling that comes into the classroom is this kind of readiness and preparation and this kind of commitment to each other Around this learning experience, and that's what the breakthrough has been for me This is just one classroom experience and so in speaking to the themes that Jeremy and Alex and others are talking about in this room is that you know, we no longer need to think about sources The the use of the sources the uses of the sources being divorced from each other We can think about the network power of reuse of materials scholarly materials that can support Contemplation individual contemplation and Collaboration around scholarship and this seems to be an essential thing that we need to do right now. So thank you so much All right, if I hit slide show will it come back so that I don't have to crane my neck. Yeah, I'll crane my neck That's okay. Hi. I'm Alex I'm from Jaystore If you don't know who Ithaca is come see me afterward. You should probably know some of you work for it So first of all I feel like I need that experience in a lot of the meetings that I go to Because that experience of people having read the materials is important. I As you know, I work for Jaystore Jaystore is an enormous library has an incredible rich Content usually it's associated with the research enterprise But all of that material is largely driven is very important for the educational enterprise You can see our little usage annual usage chart at the bottom huge peaks During turn when term papers are due when students are doing research Undergraduates writing papers is a large part of our usage But some of our usage a lot of it is actually driven by more directed usage where a teacher is Sharing an individual link to a canonical article sharing including Jaystore material and syllabi and We would want people reading this material because it's just as complicated Some of it as the material that Laysha was just just showing to have an experience in an environment where they can Collaborate with their teacher and learn like that But there are some barriers and hurdles to that happening So right now teachers already do this they share Jaystore materials with their classes. I'm sure they do that for some of your platforms as well That happens in a few ways. So a teacher might share a link in the syllabus Problem with that is that students tend to drop off Especially because the whole authentication thing gets really complicated and it's very easy especially for when people are offline to Not be able to authenticate or get lost in a proxy server somewhere Teacher instead to avoid that could embed a PDF onto the J onto the into the LMS That allows the student to have immediate access But the nobody sees that usage and so actually it's against Jaystore's terms and conditions because that usage isn't Isn't visible and that's very important to our publishers to be able to see that teachers do it all the time though and then even when they do get access the Students can have to read the material and as we just saw reading that material is really Challenging and it's intimidating and especially if I'm you know at a community college or an early undergraduate Getting the scaffolding and supports for that environment for those challenges is really important So for the past year ish We've been working on a pilot project But between hypothesis and Jaystore to solve that problem We developed it about a year ago allowed into the summer and it's been running at 30 institutions in the fall semester and the spring semester We've been gradually Expanding it to more and more institutions as there's been interest and we're seeing some positive results We've worked with teaching and learning centers across at each of these institutions to build awareness Provide supports for teachers like Leisha to be able to use the integration And have conducted follow-on quality qualitative interviews with those who have used the integration to make sure that it's worth scaling and that there are Nobody gets dropped in the handoff and all of that so what that's allowed us to do is Have an environment where teachers can embed Jaystore material directly into the LMS using the hypothesis integration and do so in a way that Students immediately get authenticated at so they don't there's nothing lost on the way and it's on the Jaystore Platform so our publishers see the usage we see the usage usage and it's within our terms and conditions that then creates the environment that Leisha was talking about for collaborative learning and And for collaborative learning So let me show you what that looks like really quickly although And then we'll go from there. So you already saw with Leisha's quick demo canvas This is a test version that we have teacher assigns an individual in this case. It's an article One of the more canonical articles in Jaystore called. What is it like to be a bat? We're now as you make an assignment you select the teacher selects the tools that they want the the the Students to engage in whether it's a quiz or whatever in this case They select a hypothesis reading assignment and then choose Jaystore article when you're putting together a syllabus you have links of Materials that you're going to refer your students to that's what we ask for here They can get that from the Jaystore platform and then when they do that what we're doing is so the teacher has already Authenticated into the learning management system. They just sign in every learning management system as a has controls like that That's associated with an institution Jaystore And so an institution code and hypothesis gets accessed based on that We've worked with hypothesis to map the institution codes between Hypothesis and Jaystore so that we can then connect that we know we can look up for this teacher whether they have access to this to this article Jaystore is rapidly trying to expand access to all of its materials But still there are some things that not everybody has access to so we want to check that We verify that they do and if they do they can go ahead and create the experience This is a and so what this is essentially an iframe So this is a hosted environment that they the student gets to directly from the learning management system The left side of the pane is Jaystore's part. That's on Jaystore platform. That's hitting every reuse hits Jaystore And this is significant use so this is not just a single Download but you saw the number of comments that Laysha was engendering every one of those refreshes is a page view and a content access That publishers and librarians should care about One class of one assignment of one article at UC Santa Cruz led to to 30 people led to over 300 content accesses of that article That's great. We're thrilled about that And then the students don't have to reauthenticate get access and because it's at the site level not individual Privacy is protected. We never Jaystore doesn't know student accounts or your teacher accounts or anything like that or see the annotations Those annotations are then kept within the context. They can be kept private as a As a student I can write notes to myself I can write them to my class if I have a hypothesis account. I can save them for perpetuity and archive them I don't have to if I don't want to but the the context of this as a classroom is very important because annotations We don't want all of social Conversation in the wild that conversation around your paper would have been very different if it were in a public forum And it creates this collaborative learning environment that can be really excited Really powerful that's especially important in an era where there are all of these forces like chat GPT That may offer alternatives to the kind of close reading and engagement with materials that hypothesis And these tools can provide Chat GPT, I you know, I would argue that especially in the humanities a Summary of an article is not the same thing as the article itself and engaging with the actual text and language Deepins the understanding and Lisha's example absolutely testified to that What we learned during this pilot was that those who used it were over the moon at the At the ease we had very a lot of very strong and positive Experiences we did have some trouble some struggles driving awareness of this J store materials are not always thought of as textbook materials. So this was a little bit different kind of Activity, but as they grow as teachers had awareness We're seeing gradually increasing Interest and value and so over the next year. We're going to be extending the pilot Expand it to many more schools as we can it's still a pilot So there's some infrastructure that we need to continue to develop to scale that build awareness and then the other thing I'm really excited about is Sneaking in a plug to add image annotation J stores very interested in having we have a lot of images that are vital to what we have on the collection and Being able to annotate those in the same kind of environment is really exciting Can't be done now, but we're going to be doing some testing to be able to do that And that's how we're planning to do to scale it within J store environment And I'll hand it over to Jeremy about scaling beyond that one concern I have is that we've made it look too easy for you how all this works and so We're not going to turn to talk about scaling this operation or scaling this case study But I want I've heard that One of the things about CNI that's so great is that It's not the presentations that are great. It's the conversations that follow So now the pressure is on you guys because we're going to provoke you in a discussion of some of the topics that we've brought up today, so You all know that educational content is increasingly digital And that that content is delivered by many many different platforms some of them represented in the membership here or in attendance And so students every day are navigating They're going from the LMS as we saw and navigating multiple sources of content every day And they don't have a unified experience because sometimes those places have native tools that they can they can leverage Sometimes those content platforms do not and then when they're in the LMS They have other tools that they can access and so even though it looks really easy to do what lace is doing and What we're doing with the J store pilot. There's still a lot of infrastructure there's still a lot of work to be done to truly make a good experience for students in this environment and I Want to return to a sort of mirror image of the problem that hypothesis began with This is you have to be ready for this right I want to hypothesize that some version of the original Hypothesis hypothesis exists within the education space There's the LMS where a lot of content is being delivered There's some learning tools that students can access in there and then much of the content most of the content that students are Accessing is actually outside the LMS And so they're moving back and forth and they have certain tools in some places and no tools in the other and other places there are different tools in other places and So the problem that we're dealing with I think is trying to create a better experience for students and for scholars as they're navigating all these different platforms and That's where we want to employ you guys to start to think through Do you see this as a problem from your perspective wherever you sit in this? Marketplace what are your challenges? How can we address those challenges together? And so with that we're going to open it up for Q&A and discussion What happens to that doubt it So I'll answer a part of that but I'll turn it back over to Jeremy to answer it fully so the the so the demo I showed you was back was That reading is already nine months old So so the the content lives indefinitely in the local canvas instance But students at least at CU don't have eternal access to that canvas instance Certainly like So I'll be teaching that same class again in the fall. I already know where Based on things that students understood and what they didn't understand how I want to introduce things reintroduce things so it's a it's a it's so it's it's a lot of data about Student learning it's all so externalized I also use it to prep the next time the the actual readings themselves. And so yes having that content is helpful Just some small examples. I mean this is much smaller But you know, you know one of the big things I do is write a lot of letters of recommendation for students And it's really helpful to go back and say what did Louise how do we perform in that class? And what did you really think and so I can write a much more Much richer kind of much richer experience of each student that comes through And that's wonderful too I mean they come to me for other reasons because they know I know them through their Writings even if they didn't talk in in in in class I'll just add that one of the things I think you'll appreciate about Dan and hypothesis and how We've gone about building this infrastructure is that it's been deeply archival in its nature, right? And that's part of the problem is some note-taking platforms aren't really attending to the true source of a document and to locating You know commentary and discussion in those original sources and hypothesis has built its infrastructure So the things are grounded in you know unique identifiers for documents Whether that's a web URL a PDF fingerprint or stable URL in the case of the J store integration But then the trick is showing those annotations in the proper contexts, right? So Laysha has probably continued access to her courses at CU Boulder She should be able to take her prompt annotations and move those to a new context a new course Those students again depending on the university policy may not be able to go back and see those annotations in context In the in the course, but they're anchored to that document and that document has a unique Identifier in the world again, whether it's a URL or PDF fingerprint, right? So theoretically not all the infrastructure is built there, but theoretically students in Glacier's course if they Graduate undergrad and they go to information science, you know graduate school and they go to a different university That university also has access to the same, you know repositories They could we can reconstitute their annotations for them in those new contexts because all the infrastructure is in place for them Once they're in that, you know have access to the content they can call up their annotations again I hope that helps answer the question It does include book chapters. So not entire books book chapters. I mean theoretically you could add a hundred chapters Great That's right Absolutely, I mean, I think that's the crux of the problem right there and the crux of the opportunity And that's absolutely what we're working on the JSTOR Implementation is meant to be a model for that others might follow We are working with some textbook publishers as well as you know in conversations with other journal journals and journal repositories But it really only works if we that's the idea of the interoperable infrastructure is that it has to include all these different partners content platforms tool providers for really to be a universal, you know seamless up Experience for for students and for scholars and so we are in conversation We've launched a coalition called the social learning across content coalition, which includes a number of I think I actually have a slide for it. It's not hidden But yeah, I think Elsevier is part of that Dan and Hathi trust Evesco ProQuest all of these folks have committed to the idea of interoperability and starting to address the challenges of all working together so that tools like hypothesis could work more easily across all those different content platforms and then JSTOR is one of the first sort of concrete prototypes that has come out of that conversation But it only works if this is because you know students and and teachers are agnostic about the source of the content Right, I'm a big fan of JSTOR, but the article I might need is in you know Epsco or ProQuest or something like that and so unless I can access those other you know content providers It's limited For Alex you said that the 30 students in Lace's class generated 300 hits wasn't Lace's class was another it was another class But it generated 300 hits against JSTOR content accesses, but yes, so are aren't you afraid of hit inflation or You know having an artificially large amount So the way JSTOR and I'm not the best person to talk about this, but the way JSTOR accounts content accesses tries to Be careful with that with hit inflation Which can happen when you're just doing web data content accesses is usually a single PDF download or A set number of page views within a session and so 300 means they've come back multiple sessions I mean as far as is that what you were talking about with inflation or are you worried or do you think that JSTOR doesn't want that usage well It may affect your usage statistics in a way that is you're not prepared for It's possible. I I think I'd love like that problem right like I that sounds like a good problem to then have to work through and See what we'd have to change to address But I I'd love to see that additional usage so and you are tracking it on a granular level as to page views Yes, we we log. Yes. Yeah Counter it's all counterfeit. Thanks Save me time Bruce You know I have seen some interesting annotations done on Transcripts as a way that are time bound within the video And that can be a nice way to deepen the enrichment of A video and sort of force that close reading for it if you want to call it that of a video I thought that I bought this this is working on the image and video annotation this this calendar year So we're expecting to add that but I think that's part of it, right? There are video annotation platforms and their text annotation platforms and their ways to mark up images But if you're using a bunch of different places to take your notes and having your conversations and it's not unified So you really need to have a system that's taking into consideration all the not the content providers only but also formats of different Document types images video, etc This I guess I don't think about it like that. I I mean I have readings. I need students to cover in a course So I don't assign more or less To compel the reading I It's my my attachment of what they learn in the reading to Projects and things that are is meant to compel them and then you know if that doesn't work But it usually does because we're all we all then become pretty invested together Then some what's great about hypothesis is that it's integrated with the learning management system And you can assign I don't care if it's one point out of a thousand or ten points out of a thousand They will still read that paper, you know, we're just like, you know So so so there's just all those things together that keep them So I don't so I don't do more or less because of that. I just want them to read the ones I say and Please commit to that. Yeah The guardrails really help with that Yes I Love it. Yeah She's gonna earn an administrative role actually for all her advocacy for hypothesis So my learning curve Was three semesters which it wasn't that bad because the first semester was still a success Just not I wasn't as honed in what I came to by the third semester So so what I didn't show you was that in addition to the prompts that I asked students to write to They are also writing additional ones on their own. There's a lot. So I mean I must have I don't know Maybe maybe 800 annotations per paper like that for 50 students or something like that. I don't know So that's question What so so what I what I did learn was that? the biggest shift in my practice was Asking students grads as well asking them to annotate at least three times in a paper in a paper or an article They would do three times and They would do the beginning and the end and then somewhere in the middle they so they weren't reading it It was more than before because I at least got them to open up the file Right and so that I'm like, okay I have to be and so then I the slide we skipped because I was using too much time And that's my fault was I want I I realized I could use this as my Virtual me so if I could read so I'm teaching ethnography class right now for Computer science, which sounds crazy. I know but but it's with 50 students and when you're teaching ethnography class Ideally, you just want to teach five people at a time and you want to go out into the world and show them how to see things Which you can't do that. So like so the whole philosophy is how do you How can you coach students without being there and so what the annotations do? Yes, it gets them to read the paper and I have to make them do that But I prompt in a way that I'm acting like a coach Like I'm always whispering in their ear as though I'm reading right next to them And so some of that heavy stuff around the Tuskegee stuff a lot of these students had never heard of it before And we could get to the end of the paper and they've read some really disturbing things about Disinformation online right now and how black Americans are being attacked And at the end I asked them how are you feeling about this? How are you feeling about your classmates? What do you want to bring to the classroom and that's that kind of coaching slash Therapist maybe a little bit which gives them at least a place to kind of talk about that reading and and perhaps bring it back To the classroom or at least let others read it there even if they don't want to talk about it So that's how I evolve knowing that I could be that kind of person to them and not just read the paper I could be their coach and their person that supports them And I think with that we're at time, but we're gonna be around for the remainder of this Conference so please pull us aside and I hope you guys will you know consider that you know What laces being what laces done supporting students giving students an opportunity for peer learning in the kind of difficult content that? Some of you are providing or some of you are starting on your campus is really important to get them to engage with so thanks for everything


Hey, everybody, what's up? It's Rob Dodson. Welcome back to The AliCast Show. Today, I want to talk about headings and landmarks, the importance that they play in accessible navigation. So headings, as you're familiar with, whenever you're looking at a web page, what a sighted user is often going to do is they're going to scan the document looking for areas of larger text or bold text to figure out what the important content is. Sort of like the quintessential example is a newspaper, right, where you've got the big headline that tells you the really important story. And you've got smaller subheadings to tell you the less important parts of the page. And so in general, headings help you form an outline or a skeleton for a document. Now, for a stream reader user, though they don't get those same visual affordances, we can still convey that outline or that structure to those users by using the correct semantic elements. So in particular, using the H1 through the H6 tags. And so let me show you an example of a before and after experience when we do a good job using headings. So this is a little site that I've put together. It's kind of like a little lifestyle consumerism site type thing. And what I want to do first is just go through this with a stream reader. And this version does not really have any headings whatsoever, even though I've styled things to look like I've got some big sort of heading sections. If I turn on my screen reader, and if I open my rotor, so in voiceover, there's a little sort of menu we can open to find all the headings and landmarks and things like that. Link's menu, form controls, no items in window spots. Link's menu. OK, I can see that there's no headings whatsoever. So that means the only real way that I can navigate through this document or the primary way that I'm going to navigate through this document is just kind of to like go line by line. Link, lifestyle, link, two items in cart, today's posts, food, link, image, a pile of citrus, eat fresh every day, laurum, ipsum, dollar. Now the problem is there's nothing really telling me the hierarchy here, so I can't really tell if a piece of text is big and important, if it's defining a section for me. It all just sort of seems like it's at the same level of importance in the document. So it's kind of hard to tell or to interpret what it's trying to convey to me. Now let's look at the same version, but this time, using proper H1 through H6 tags. Lifestyle, web content, you are currently online. So I'll open the headings menu for starts. Link's menu, heading's menu. All right, and I can see there's a bunch of different heading levels inside of here. So heading level one, lifestyle. Level one tells me, boom, this is the page that you're on. Level two is going to tell me the major sections, like today's post, and there's also another one down here called hot list, right? So now I can jump to two different sections of the site. And then within each of these, the articles have H3 headings. And in voiceover, I can actually navigate by heading even, so I can say control alt command. Heading level three, lovely landscapes, heading level three, inspiring minimal workspaces. Right, so I've actually increased the efficiency of the user navigation experience using a screen reader. And in fact, if you look at some screen reader surveys where they ask folks who use assistive technology, like what's kind of your primary way of navigating an unfamiliar page? A lot of folks say the first thing they do is they try and navigate by heading. So that way we're helping them kind of skip any repetitive or boilerplate content and get right to the important sections of the page and start to form that structure in their mind of what the document looks like. I should also mention that with headings, there's kind of like an order that we want to follow, right? So starting with H1 and working our way down to H2, H3, H4, and so on, what I see a lot of developers do is they will skip levels because headings have a little bit of default styling. So someone might say, oh, well, I've got a smaller heading here in my design. So I'll just skip H2 and H3 and go right to H4. In general, you don't want to do that. In general, what you want to do is you want to use the heading levels in order, in sequential order, right? So if you have something that is secondary content, use an H2 for it and then you use CSS to style it down to whatever size your design calls for. Another interesting technique that you can do with headings, which I've actually done on this site, is sometimes you have areas where the design does not call for a heading. Like we have kind of this main content area and then we've got this hot list area. The hot list area has a heading, right? But this main content area doesn't. But we've kind of indicated to the user that it's really important by making it like big and central. And so one thing we can do is we can actually take a heading and we can just position it off screen using CSS. So that way our screen reader user is still going to get that content. They're still going to get that affordance conveyed to them that this is an important section. But that way it doesn't have to be in our design if the design doesn't call for it. So for instance, if I go up here and I start again at lifestyle. Voice over off. Voice over on Chrome. Lifestyle, window, lifestyle. Visit heading level two, today's post. So you can see that even though there's not a heading on screen that says today's post, kind of like snuck one in there. So that way the navigating experience is a lot more efficient. Now the other side to this, beyond just headings, since headings are good for forming the kind of the skeleton of your page, is you can also define major regions of the page using landmark elements or landmark aria roles. All right, so I'll show you the section over here in the W3C docs on landmarks. So there's a few HTML5 elements like aside and footer and header and main and nav that I think a lot of developers are familiar with but don't always use that frequently because they don't give you any default styling. So a lot of times people just use divs for everything and then they apply CSS to them. But one of the cool things that you get from using these landmark elements is that they have these kind of semantic roles built into them and users can use them to navigate the page more effectively. So here is that same site. This time I've also added landmark elements. So my main content here is inside of a main tag instead of just a div. My navigation up here where it says lifestyle and it has little shopping carts instead of a nav element. My sidebar is inside of an aside element. So now when I turn on my screen reader, voiceover on Chrome, lifestyle, window, heading menu. I can open the rotor, voice, form, control, no items, landmarks, menu. Go to the landmark section. Navig main, complimentary, heading level two, hot list. Boom, I've gone right over to my sidebar, right onto that H2 and now I've skipped everything else on the page that I wasn't interested in that I didn't want to navigate to and I know because maybe I'm familiar with the document that over in that sidebar is the hot list or whatever and that's what I want to see, right? I want to see the current articles that are trending and whatnot. So using proper headings and using landmark elements, you can really, really increase the efficiency of the user navigation on your page. So if you're working on a site right now, go through, look at your heading level, make sure it makes sense and forms a proper skeleton and then look for places where you can add landmark elements to kind of region the page up a bit better. That about covers it for today. So if you have any questions for me, you can always leave them down below in the comments or hit me up on a social network of your choosing. As always, thank you so much for watching and I'll see you next time. Hey, if you want to learn more about navigating headings and landmarks using screen readers, we've got a couple of videos over in our playlist that you can check out, give them a look. Again, thank you so much for watching and I'll see you next time.


Thanks for checking out this movie review video. This is for the 1971 Italian giallo film release This case of the scorpions tail now this one's by Sergio Martino. So hopefully by now I keep forgetting to do this hopefully by now when this video comes out I actually have a playlist on my youtube channel for Sergio Martino films because I know I've talked about doing that and then I just keep forgetting to do that But other than that I actually have an entire playlist of just tons of giallo film reviews So you can check those out if you care about something like that and if you're checking this review out I would assume you probably are at least somewhat interested in some giallo films Anyway, the case of the scorpions tail from 1971 directed by Sergio Martino Who also did some other films such as your vices a locked room and only I have the key that is the longest title All the colors of the dark the strange vice of mrs. Ward torso the suspicious death of a minor and American rickshaw just to name a few Written by Eduardo Manzanos who also wrote scripts for satanic with a K The strange vice of mrs. Ward night of the devils and a lot of westerns That was a big thing back then a lot of Italian westerns Saro Scavelini who also wrote the script for your vices a locked room and only I have the key All the colors of the dark and of the pleasure of the torment and American rickshaw, which I still need to review that and Ernesto Gestaldi who wrote scripts for the vampire and the ballerina Werewolf in a girl's dormitory the whip and the body which is a boba film and I have a review for that Your vice I have the your vice is sorry your vice is locked room and only I have the key I've said so many times now all the colors of the dark the case of the bloody iris the strange vice of mrs. Ward torso the suspicious death of a minor and Yes, that's that's it for now George Hilton stars in this film as Peter Lynch. Yes, the Insurance Investigator who ends up being the killer There you go. This is a spoiler review because it's very old. So just know that George Hilton stars in this is Peter Lynch And he's also been in the films the moment to kill the strange vice of mrs. Ward all the colors of the dark My dear killer the two faces of fear the case of the bloody iris and the killer must kill again Just to name some of his horror related films now. I like him personally what I've seen him in I think he does a very excellent job So I was very happy to see that he was in this one and there was someone else who shows up in this one Who I've seen in other things as well playing inspector Stavros was Luigi pastilly Who's also been in the iguana with the tongue of fire, which I've not seen yet a bay of blood Which I love and have a review for and you guessed it your vice is a locked room and only I have the key How many times am I gonna say that during this review? Oh my gosh This is actually considered to be one of Sergio Martino's best films now after watching it It's a pretty it's a solid it's a solid good giallo film And I definitely enjoyed it especially on a one-time through watch I don't know how much rewatch value it's really gonna have but it's solid enough I'll definitely rewatch it at some point, but I would say in comparison to other stuff Martino's done I think the strange vice of mrs. Ward is definitely better than this film Mainly story-wise This looks good Looks beautiful not just from the standpoint of the actual filmmaking because Martino does a good job His his cinematography is really good. The directing is really good acting is really good And just the locations that they shoot at especially at the very end on the ocean with the boat and the All the rocks on the you know on the coast that they go into Looks beautiful awesome But then also within the city all the architecture and that's something that I love about Giallo films in general is there's a lot of that that ends up being shown in these films and it just makes me want to live in 1970s Italy it really does that's part of the reason I love giallo film so much Pretty boring beginning of this film unfortunately with the lady in the red hat who we Learn is Lisa or Lisa as they say her name She's just walking as the opening credits are happening. That's really boring But you do get to see a decent amount of the city. So that's kind of cool, but I was like Is this it like she's just walking but you know Older films that kind of took their time a little bit more I laughed at the really fake airplane that they end up showing here when it's it's going between that What's supposed to be the airplane, you know flying and then intercut with the scenes of Lisa having sex with her Male companion who is obviously not her husband and then baboom their plane explodes Which we find out in the end even though it's in question for a bit Her husband was on most likely and thus they were gonna do a sequel to this and they plan that out Yeah, but the intercutting was was funny just because the plane looks so fake and stupid So I laughed at that I had to Philip blackmailing Lisa is a really good scene, especially when they show the black gloved Killer type looking guy in the trench coat watching them talk And then obviously that's followed up with Philip and it ending up being killed And we find out much later that that was kind of the henchmen of laura So laura had the same idea as peter ends up having in the film To go after lisa for the one million dollars in insurance money for the Life insurance that her husband had And they both knew at that point they were both kind of vying for her So actually I think for that reason it might be good to do a rewatch to kind of see like How they're both going after her at the same time because they both know that she's Withdrawn that million dollars And has it in cash on her The music when lisa enters the ransacked apartment Is a series of discordant noises that add to the tension very very well And it makes you feel like something is going to happen Now this is the one where something obviously did happen because that's where she finds philip has been stabbed So that discordant music making you feel like something's going to happen It happens so it worked really really well and it's kind of unsettling at the same time that music So I think it worked for what she eventually finds which is you know him crawling on the ground bleeding like crazy Not sure why peter thinks introducing himself to lisa is a good idea He's supposed to be investigating her now This is when you just think because it's early on that he's just there to do his job For the insurance company, which he is that's why he's there But he you learn by the end obviously he had his own motives because he's like, you know I'm sick of my job and all the money I save for my job and I don't get any extra money So I'm going to take some of that extra money for myself. So But I just didn't understand why he introduces himself to her It doesn't make like an ounce of sense He's supposed to be investigating her and even if even if he's not going to do that And he's going to go through this plan. He shouldn't want her to know who he is So I think they do that Within the script just to make sure that people feel like he's legit in what he's doing And not really trying to hide things necessarily. They don't want them to look too suspicious So I think that's why they had him introduce himself. So it makes sense from that standpoint But from kind of like a would he really do this standpoint? It doesn't make sense in my opinion Interesting reveal with laura saying that she was about to marry lisa's husband Which makes the timing of his death extremely suspect Um that is a really good setup because it's one of those things where you're already getting suspicious of lisa But then all of a sudden Boom another twist Her husband had another lover and they were going to end up getting married Which means that she was going to end up getting that insurance money when he died. So then it brings up the question Did she have plans to have him killed as well? Because in the end you find out that she had plans to have lisa killed because she wanted that money Now did she only want that money because lisa's husband was gone? Or did she always plan to get her hands on that money by offing lisa's husband after she married him? Makes you think I definitely expected lisa to get killed much earlier in the film But she does get killed especially when she got that money out. I was just like you're really making yourself A target right now by pulling out all that money and plenty of people knew that she was getting that money because I think there was actually a I think there's a part where they actually showed there was a Newspaper article about it at the same time. So a lot of people knew that she had that money The focus on john handing a crisp bill to the guy at the restaurant is meant to kind of drum up suspicion As him as the potential killer But then it's followed by peter catching someone at laura's place When john went to talk to laura And I believe that was then revealed that it was laura's henchman who had killed philip So that kind of then takes some of the suspicion off of john But then I kept thinking back to that like they zoom in on him using that like crisp bill because it looks a lot like the Like crisp bills that were given to lisa when she took out that million dollars. So Um Like most giallo films there are plenty of moments where they're trying to just drum up suspicion in many different Directions in order to kind of throw people off which I thought they did a pretty good job because I didn't guess that it would end up being peter I really didn't Cleo casually drops the idea for lisa's husband not being dead Which is exactly what I thought was going to end up being the case I thought the killer was going to be your husband because there was a little bit of suspicion Especially with cleo dropping that saying that Oh, well, or maybe he's just not even dead in the first place and I was like Oh, I think they placed that in there and did it like kind of quick As a way to be like the information was always there But no in the end it just ended up being another one of those little tidbits to get you to think otherwise Move you further away from peter as a suspect So based on the conversation in the rain laura was planning to have lisa taken out But someone else got there first which was peter we talked about The slow motion scene of laura running to the door as the lock is being jimmied is a really good tense scene I love that scene. That might be one of my favorite scenes in the film Between the music and how they handle that the slow motion and the physical acting of the the actress who played laura I thought that was really cool It's just like going back and forth between like the lock being jimmied and her like no Going for it. That was a cool moment. I really like that one The spray of laura's blood on the window when she eventually does get killed is awesome They kind of do the shot from behind into the side where he's putting it You see that he's going for the knife in her neck and you just see the spray of the blood coming out on the window It looked really good. And then they show it from the other side Of the window very very cool I Like how it's an automatic assumption. It's a sex maniac when women end up getting killed now. It's not just in this film It's in giallo in general It's always this thing when more than one woman has been killed Well, sometimes depending on the film even when one woman's just been killed. They're like, ah, must be a sex maniac out killing again So I just thought that was funny that came up in this one because it happens all the time uh, the paprika can the moment where Cleo's has cooked for uh, peter and she made some goulash And it's still in the pot and he almost kind of like has to spit it out Because the paprika is too uh, too strong and then you find the entire can of paprika in there I felt like that was very over the top like nobody would do that like first of all some Uh, most people probably wouldn't drop an entire can in there, but even if they did by accident I'm sure they would know it and they wouldn't just leave it in there. It was just kind of It was dumb. I think it was put in there as like a way to kind of work towards them than Getting to having sex, but there's so many ways to get characters to have sex That are better than that in my opinion The sideways camera there was this weird sideways camera thing that they did During a conversation between peter and stavros. I thought it was terrible It looked bad and it was just severely distracting It was very hard to get like your bearings when you're trying to watch that scene Because it's literally sideways and it kept going like between the two of them I hated that scene. I had a big problem with it It's p.  Because I don't think he would actually be working with the police because he's not a police officer I mean, I don't obviously know how Uh, insurance, uh, investigating really works But especially not in italy in the 1970s But it just seems weird to me that his employer would be like, yeah, just stick around there I guess because it was a million dollars It was so high stakes that they wanted him to do all the work he could But regardless, he was still just treating it like a vacation And I guess in retrospect that was probably because he knew where the million dollars was It was in that underwater cave, which is an awesome hiding place Not just from the standpoint of it was smart because it was very well hidden But from the standpoint of it looked great for the film, especially the inside shot Yeah, I really like that about it. So Oh peter Why would clio think peter wouldn't know when she left the boat to go see what he was doing when he was Diving under with that bag which ended up being the money that he was hiding She got up and she like snuck out. She's like, he'll never know that I left the boat Well, the boat isn't that large and they were sleeping like right there And she was probably going to be gone for a long time. Also, he probably would have heard the noise of her getting into the water Obviously that did happen because he ends up showing up behind her while she's in the little Kind of like cave grotto where he had everything hidden So I just I was just like this is dumb. How does she think that he's not going to wake up? peter's plan was pretty intricate down to the duplication of the cufflinks Which is where the title obviously of the film comes from The case of the scorpions tale how he was like, I'm gonna put one of them at this crime scene I'm gonna put another at this crime scene and kind of try and throw everyone off So he basically went to killing additional people just to keep the ruse up and kind of distract Like this film tries to distract the audience in order to get away So it was cool Rough moment for cleo when peter lets her know she didn't actually call anyone for help When he's coming at her the whole plan has been revealed and she's trying to Fend him off and she thinks that she makes an sos call basically and he reveals Oh, you know, you actually have to turn it on in order to make that happen I thought it was like a that's a rough moment But she gets that spear gun nails him in the shoulder, which I thought was cool I actually literally made a noise when that happened I was like oh because that would that would hurt that would hurt The camera work through and around the rock at the end is pretty great That is one thing that surgery martino has done a lot in this film a lot of camera movement It's not really sitting still a whole lot Lots and lots of movement kind of around characters and moving with characters and moving around scenes The best of which is what I just talked about when he it was moving like you're looking at Peter coming for Cleo Through so like a hole in the rocks and then it kind of like moves back and pans to the side and you see her hiding Behind the rocks and then it kind of pans up a great camera movement very engaging for the audience and it just it looks great And like I said the the camera was pretty much just about always moving in this film, which is wonderful It really does keep you engaged Also to point out to kind of go with what I just said that there are a lot of camera shots that are end up being through things Or around things like objects And I think that gives it this interesting kind of like voyeuristic element to the film Which I think is cool in in two separate ways in one way because it's almost kind of like a little bit of the Killers POV type thing But also just from the standpoint of like you're an observer of what's going on Like it makes you feel like it's a little more realistic. It kind of sucks you in more for that reason Uh, there's a lot of focus on eyes in the film now. This is done in some other giallo films Um, most recently I'm trying to remember what the most recent one was that I watched that had that to it Was it knife of ice? I think it may have been by Umberto Lindsey. He had a lot of focus on eyes in that one um People but also the dolls and the painting in laura's attic That had a lot of focus on the eyes of the dolls and the painting of that creepy person whose eyes were just like this It was nuts and then that glass in the eye scene With the bottle Nailed in the in the head and that glass in the eye. Oh, that was an awesome scene gore wise kill wise That was a wonderful scene. It looked really really great, but such a focus on eyes This is the ultimate as far as being sick of your job goes since peter explained How much money he saved for his insurance company? It is the ultimate to go to this length of Hating your job and being jealous that you're saving all this money for this job And you're not getting enough. So um, it's Not the best motivation. I've seen in a giallo film. It's definitely not the worst. It's kind of Little in between ish So, uh, that's basically all I have to say about the film. I'd love to hear what you have to say about it So put some comments down here and let's talk about it. But out of five stars with half stars in play This one's solid I'm gonna give it a three star rating. I was between three and three and a half because of the story, but Now, you know what? I want to bump it up to three and a half actually just because The camera work is so good and the story is pretty solid and I didn't guess who it was in the end So I'm going three and a half on this one. This one's solid Um, quite like it. So like I said, let's talk. Let's get nerdy and uh, yeah Do me a quick favor though hit that subscribe button That is your best way to repay me if you like this video or any video I have ever done I really do appreciate that anytime anyone subscribes. I'm just trying to build this nerdy horror Film community so we can keep talking about these awesome films And also hit the notification bell button because that way you'll know whenever I'm putting up new videos Whether it's an in-depth review like this one of my no spoiler reviews for newer films or an unboxing video haul video Opinion piece any of that stuff. So I'm doing a lot of different videos. So Regardless, I appreciate you taking your time to watch this and until next time keep it brutal. Oh And this is what I watched it on I I meant to do that in the in the beginning But here you go the case of the scorpion's tail on arrow release on blu-ray. So anyway Once again, keep it brutal


In the morning, use the hashtag C3T, or write us an email to hello at 3tlingew.org. It's a laser physicist, it's a science-slammer, you know, it's a very big picture. It's just, it's about television, Microsoft. It's about picture, how you get them and how they're related to each other. And how our image is informed by them. Thank you very much. Yes, good morning. Good morning everybody. Let's get started. First of all, me, why am I standing here? I'm a physicist, which changed to biophysics to build a microscope. I told that about a comic during and explained to her like half an hour. And she drew that picture. She's a very good artist and follow her on Twitter and I want to thank you again for this great image. I'm a physicist and somehow I got my boss to biochemistry and started building microscopes. The talk's name is about the four things in life. So let's first have a look at the four things which I'm talking about. Here you can see a one-set piece. You can see a little piece of glass on it. There are cells on it. You can't see that in this camera. You have to use your first microscope for this. And that's a face-contrast microscope. And the first picture you get, that looks like that. You see a little bit on the right-hand side, there are some little structures. On the left-hand side, you can see the shapes from the sand piece. So a feeling for the size. If I zoom in to 20, you can see a little bit more of the cells. At 40, you can see. You see the cores of the cells and also the cell periphery. If you want to see more of the details, you can't use a face. You have to use flour since microscope. So you color and you put ionates and you register the slide. And then you can see the structures in the cell. So we still use the 40 times of magnification as we use it here. And change to fluorescence. And here, you can see we get very beautiful images you can see here. And that's why I really love the field of microscopy. If we zoom in in one of these cells, on the left-hand side, you see the whole picture on the right-hand side. It's just the part of the cell. There you see there are a lot of things in there. And if you zoom in even more. So you want to see the internal structures of the cell.  It looks like Lord Spaghetti. So before I tell you why this is happening. So what are these kind of things? You can see there, these are microtubules. That's very important part of the cytoskeleton of the cell. So they can keep shape. It's formed from proteins, which form such rings, fall from 13 parts, which form like a cell case. The diameter is 25 nanometers. On such of these macroscopic pictures, you can see 25 nanometers. They don't appear to size. So if you look at the scale bar on the top right corner, this doesn't fit. These tubes are way bigger. And that's not because of magnification. But here, this is the key reason. Then physics. Some of you have already heard about the fraction limits. And Abe had come up with this. The most important part for Christens is this person over here. That's Rayleigh. He came up with the Rayleigh Criterium. And this Criterium tells you how can you, if you have two point shaped sources, when can you still defect them. So for Christens' macroscopy, all the styles we use, which gave us these very nice pictures, are just form sources. This is 250 nanometers. If you go smaller, you can't tell them apart anymore. At least not with normal macroscopy. You can go around to use a refresh limit. There are various points. But you have other problems if you use these other techniques. I have a few of these. The first is structure dilumination. Sim stimulates emission depletion. And the last one is single molecule localization. 240 for stats, the Nobel Prize was awarded in Chemistry. How you use the techniques to go around this fraction? For Sim, you use free transformations. Stat goes into laser technology. So you directly use the light you're going to use. And the last one, storm, you use a fitting of signals. Stat is a completely interesting technique. But it's a little bit boring in this context here. Sim and storm need a lot of calculations and a lot of programs. That's what I would like to talk about today. I'd like to start about Sim. Sim works like a firing. We use the Mojev pattern effect. On the left hand side, you have two grids. If you move them back to each other, there are funny structures. You maybe notice when you're going out to barn with the car and you see how the pattern also happens on bridges. On the right hand side, you can't see much. So start shaking your hand. Can you see something? I hope you do. You should see a person in a red hoodie. This also is based on this more fringes effect. If you don't shake your head, you just don't see it. Okay, someone will see it. So it works. So using this Mojev fringes, you can see something. That's why we're using it in microscopy. We use a grid and we illuminate it. We project this grid into our sample and shift it, turn it around and again. That's how you make this Fourier transformation from this Rodeida. That's how they look like. If you put them on top of each other, you get this flower-like shape. Fourier transformation, what? That's just a transformation from the image to the frequency space.  So what you get out of it are these funny shapes in the circle in hand. That's like a normal microscopy picture. But sim, these rotations, etc., it allows us to get more information from the corner parts. And using this technology, you can get such a picture. And you can see here, we have much more information in one of these images. Just because we have rotated and shifted. So we have taken several pictures. How does it work? We take the Rode data, the shifts, the rotations and put it into a software. For example, here, FairSim. FairSim is an open-source software. If you want to just look at GitHub and have a look at it. And someone I've suited with at the University of Bielefeld. No reaction. It's early in the morning. The Rode is software. And for sim, usually there are only the software from these microscope developers. And then it's just a black box. And I just wanted to start a free software, open-source software. And in February, there will be the next paper about it, which will be also an open-access paper where they start co-optation of GPUs. They will beat every commercial software there. And commercial software needs two minutes for one image and this one 30 milliseconds. And that's, yeah, right. And the nice thing about this technology is you can use the Rode data and perhaps someone thinks, oh, we could do it even better. Maybe this grid isn't a perfect sign and we use another one and we have different software and we could put it into another software and then our picture will get even better. The Rode data is just fantastic. If you take away something from this talk, then Rode data is great. And so I have another picture here. It's a sim image. And it's an image that's really great. So the Rode data is a super-solution for globalization, macroscope from liver cells. And it was found that in diagnostics. So the applications where it has to be fast, there was really an advantage from super-resolution for certain diseases because the pores in the liver cells have the perfect size to use super-resolution paper and open access. You can look at it online. Please do that. And this is from my dear colleague, Fjola Mönchmüller. And now we go to localization microscopy. That was my PhD thesis. And the technology is called Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction, or DSTORM for short. And this is about blinking for the chemicals and dyes on it with chemistry. And the dyes don't want to do that anymore. And one out of 2,000 is working. And the others are off. And if you look at that in a microscope, that's what it looks like in the beginning. I turn on the laser. And then I really need a laser for that. And then by and by, they all turn off. And then they start flashing. And these signals are really signals from the individual molecules. They are point-sized. And if I record these signals, 10,000 or 20,000 pictures as raw data, and then from such a blurred picture, we can get this one. If I put it into the right software, it's called RapidStorm or ThunderStorm, very creative naming. Also free software. You can download it in just Google for localization software, ThunderStorm, and localization software. And with ThunderStorm alone, you get different results. But you can, if you reconstruct it, like here, you can see that, aha, it's not just one microtubule, but there are two. And you can really distinguish the two and which made the biologist in me very happy. It's very clear that this is just an improvement in resolution and how it works. Thank you to Ricardo Enricas, who made this video. If you can see, if you record the blinking of the Eiffel Tower, then at first you search for the signals and the same way you do it in the cell. And then you reconstruct the picture dot for dot. And the signals we found are also diffraction-limited and blurred. But if you do it point by point, you know that every point is a single dot. And the resolution is only dependent on the number of photons and not the limits of the optics. And that's why the resolution is increased substantially. If you want to do more colors, there are some problems. So we stay in France with the colors. So chromatic aberration causes this blur. And if you use a white light and from red, white blue, it's smeared. And it's chromatic aberration. Normally, you have to correct that with registration. And you take the two pictures and try to make them match. But such a registration is never perfect and there are bound to be errors. In my PhD thesis, I developed a technique that is specter de-storm. And we make color from raw data. And you can look at the software, how the software works. Raw data are great. And here's some more examples of what it looks like. And we can just make two colors. We can also make 3D reconstructions. All this looks a bit pixelized. But we are really at such a high resolution that you can hardly believe it. And because you hardly believe it, I will give you a little comparison of scale. And so we went down from the beginning. So this little sphere on the right side has a diameter of 150 nanometers, which really isn't a lot. And such a cent coin has 15 millimeters diameter. And if we imagine that one of these physicals is a pinhead of 3 millimeters, then for comparison, the cent piece would be 300 meters of three soccer fields. So to remember the picture from the beginning, these pinheads of physicals are these little green dots that you can see on the normal fluorescence microscopy. So we are really, really well into it, getting stuff out of the data. So it's probably a good idea to build your own microscope because there's a spectral demixing de-storm. There was nothing like that. So here's a time lapse how we built our microscope. So we just move it into another room. And some people say, especially in the life sciences, DIY bio, no, you don't do that. Don't you have enough money? So you can just order one. And I say tinkering is science. And science is tinkering. And that's part of it. Otherwise, there's no progress. Otherwise, we wouldn't have this wonderful technology. Many of these things were developed in 2006 to 2008 because there were some crazy physicists who teamed up with biologists and thought, how can we increase resolution? I don't understand that. Everyone who thinks that should think about it and listen to me for some more. And building this microscope works because there is open software. And it's micromanager based on an imageJ. An imageJ is used by biologists for image processing. But micromanager is wonderful. And the modern microscopes can be controlled by that, our STD storm can control all our different microscopes that we have. They were detected. And anyone has a new device without a driver, he just rides a driver, puts it into micromanager community, and everyone can use it. It's wonderful. And what's also cool is this picture here. This is a picture from my 12 euro microscope, which I have here. So the software which can control the most advanced microscope can also control this 12 euro microscope, which you have from online order. And Arduino also works if you build your own microscope table. So look at this, it works. So some people thought, hey, building ourself, wonderful, we can. So there's a blueprint for cost effective to just have microscopy, so such microscopes like these you can buy for 800,000 microscopes and can do two colors and 25 nanometers resolution. But you can build it for 20,000 euros with two colors, 40 nanometers. And it's important that we do these, think about these things. Because our universities say we can offer to students things from research. And what that means for third world countries where there's a university who wants to research, I don't think I have to emphasize it anymore if you look at the numbers. The same is for SIM. As fair SIM, I talked about it before, fast SIM is an idea how to do structured illumination microscopes cheaply. And if you look at the commercial offer, it's about a million for a commercial SIM microscope can do four colors, needs time minutes for the image reconstruction. Or you just use the open free software and buy the parts with not quite quite as beautiful, really neat surfaces. A lot cheaper, 25 kilo euros, three colors and 30 milliseconds for fast SIM. And it's just wonderful. The team, yeah. So that was really the applause for all the people who work in this field. And I'll meet them again in two or three weeks. Maybe they're watching. Hi. So why do so few people play with microscopes if you're working in the life sciences to research first and foremost, talk about, think about their experiment and the cell and the little bit of life that they have.  And sometimes you have completely different ideas doesn't so stick a banana in your head or something silly. All this works a bit slower. So thinking about open data, open source and making the software available. But more and more, I realize that it really can't work differently. And what I want to tell you is it's not so much about pictures but about data. And it's about making everything open and accessible. And we need good people who can write better software as I can do. I'm just a physicist. So programming is just with a hammer. And it's just a sculpture, although it should be a painting.  So there's the conclusion. I talked about the diffraction barrier and how it makes problems. So I talked about better computers, better software culture, modern cameras, and all in all, better technology so we can have super resolution such as SIM and D-Storm. And then we can make cheap DIY things. But it's mostly about data. So microscopy is data collection and not necessarily making pictures. So raw data are great. So I hope you remember that.  So many people have opened their software and published on the open access and published data on the internet. And it has to be more, so be patient with us. But it'll be more and more open science and everyone can play. And I invite everyone who has love for imagery construction and programming. And so look at the things I told you about today. And maybe have other cool ideas that we didn't have in our labs. And so I say thank you very much for listening. I'll be in the assemblies, hacking and communications near the Zendertzentrum by the wardrobe. And yes, thank you very much for your attention. Thank you very much for the extra applause for open science. We have time for about four questions. Signal Angel, is there something from the internet? Unfortunately, no. Here are the microphones. I will start with you. Question. You can start immediately with your question, but I want to say something. I have micro-etchor running here on this crabby 12 euro microscope, I put your ascent. And even with a 12 euro microscope, you can see the magnification here. It's pretty impressive, though. What is the star? There, you can see the edge of the star. Softer, which runs very well. OK, that's about the question. Easy question. You said you made several pictures, and then you put them together, and then you have the whole picture. So what is happening when the things start to move on the microscope? Answer, that's an important question. If you want to look at dynamics and biology, you have to be very fast. Using Sibon outside in the beginning, if you want to high resolution, you have way different problems. If you have to structure the nation, you have 15 pictures, five pictures, rotation, movement, rotation. If you manage to take these 15 pictures fast enough, let's say in 20 milliseconds, and you have enough emission, if you have a fast reconstruction, you have the possibility to observe these dynamics in biology. If you have to take 20,000 pictures, then I won't be able to observe very fast processes. But with modern CMOS cameras, you have the first approaches of this localization microscopy. In one brush, you take 10,000 pictures, reconstruct them, and then in perspective, you have four pictures. Then you have high resolution microscopy. That's a start for slow dynamics. In principle, all this microscopy technology, such as concentration microscopy, you exchange resolution with time. So what you see in space, you lose in measuring time. So for one of these two color images, it takes you about 10 minutes. OK. A question? If you use self-built microscopes, how are the data reproducible questions answered? In fact, even the commercial build is not like a standard. It was self-constructed. So that's your numbers, maybe three. You have optics that are standardized in a strong way. Yes, OK. If you add something yourself. A person asking asks, are there more standardized optics? So why is this?  You still need a good objective. And you have to use a standard objective. And that's the point. That's the point where it stands in force. And camera and all the optics. You just standardize material. And once you've built this microscope, you have to characterize, you have to test measurements. And then it works. Then it's reproducible. But still, they're looking very, very good results. And they think, yeah, that's good. But still, it looks like a real microscope. But yeah, it is a real microscope. You must be afraid to build your things yourself. You have to do good test measurements. Then you have reproducible measurements. But the same for commercial measurements. You have to prove they're stable. Otherwise, hm. Question? There are different types of techniques, such as conversion microscopes, to go through these limits. For example, using different wavelengths. Was this, in fact, a green, or was it colored? And are there other approaches using maybe UV, or X-UV, or maybe emulsion microscopy? So you can, beyond this diffraction limits, you don't know where this 150 nanometers are coming from. So is it going in this direction? Answer? Wavelength is not really helping. In conventional way, this is not very helpful. If you want to tune a wavelength to get a better resolution, why would you want to do this? So you're not losing time. So you want to observe life forms. If you go into your hard UV and you look at living cells, it's only a very short time you can do this. If you have a cell which is able to move fast enough, it will move away if it's able to. You can hunt them, basically. We also have to have fun in the lab, okay? So wavelength, it's not very helpful. It's in maybe a little bit. You maybe use 405 nanometers. That's the best resolution where you can change the grid, but you can't go into your UV. In standard microscopy, there are also other approaches such as convolution or kind of focal microscopes where you can't just take out and calculate something else. But if you really want to go to this resolution of 150 nanometers, you can still see a structure. There are still structures smaller, which you can see. And we use red light. So it's 643 nanometers. So the wavelength is not that important. The point is, as many of us as possible have to come out. That's what gives our resolution. Last question from the Internet. The Internet asks, what's the size of such a microscope? I didn't know what are the relations between size and complexity of such a microscope itself. Also, there are two sides of the thing. If you have a commercial microscope, they're not allowed to sell it. If you are able to look into this ocular and you can switch on these lasers, it makes sense that you're not allowed to do this. Because otherwise, you only have two eyes and you're able to get lasers into them. So all the thing is bigger because it should be stable in temperature. And in the end, you want to have the standard size boxes. In your own boss, microscopes, you have big advantage. Why do I need oculars? I just want to do a higher resolution. I don't want to look through them. So my formation is perfectly aligned with my camera. I'm just looking at the monitor. And later safety is perfect. Because I seem to be tempted to look into this. So I just see it on the camera. So the philosophy of how to do this is just completely different. You can get a point in the middle, but the point you really save money is these big boxes, heavy things, stable status. Whereas possibilities to save something, you can put in a filter, you can soft them, the software knows what it's doing. You can click something. In a cell phone set up, you have to screw a little bit and then you have to put this in there. And you have to look, is everything still set? It may be a little bit annoying. It's not that nice and user-friendly, but still there's a solution. In its high cost, you have also maintenance and support. And so you have a guarantee which you don't have on your own building. It doesn't change anything on the price. Okay, thank you very much, André. Thanks again. Everyone who is interested in physics can stay here and talk about certain afterwards. So let's thank the speaker again. And we are thanking you for listening to your translation. This has been Pink Dispatch and Frau Blauwal. Please give us feedback.