All right, I am alive Hey guys, everyone thousand you look tell We've got I've got a challenge I want to do That's a food here. I Was gonna be the really hot noodle challenge but all I could find was the I Couldn't get this in the double pot the two times in four times, but I did get it in Spicy and I tasted a little bit of that powder So I know that's not gonna understand it so now to make this hot I have here Which is a really Louisiana crystal. It's Um It's hot sauce is extra hot and here with it. I'm also going to add Louisiana hot sauce Habanero and it says just one drop does it Okay, today we went to a restaurant. What's it called? Where I got the wings It's something like a like a Hooters.  Hey, yeah, we're still up Nancy here So anyway So I got these these are leftovers. I ate about Santa what I did was Monkey kind of threw down the gauntlet on me. I got the What was it the extreme? Yeah, it says some about real taste of fire or something. She says I'm lucky. She's coming. She's getting a chair so I Told the waitress. I said, you know, she ordered her wings. I said all has a bonus But I'll have the extreme her eyes got big Welcome for the caboose. I wasn't sure what kind of couplers you need Or anything, but I figured you can change them if they didn't work or anything just have it sitting there You know, maybe in a train yard or something. So we're glad you like it That's what we've been trying to get out to you for a long time, but So anyway The wings back to the wings so I thought the waitress I said I'm gonna have the extreme And I will change them out Okay, I figured you would but I wasn't sure what You know, I can remember I've seen your train, but I couldn't really see what kind of couplers you had but cool So anyway, we was I told the woman The waitress or waitress I said, I won't have the extreme and she probably got big.  I'm like, well, yeah, but she can Make me do it well cuz she said If you can handle it, yeah, you did I did say that but I also gave in out Yeah, but then after that, you know, then that woman then our waitress She's like, are you sure you want to get on now? I got you. I can't go. Wow. No, never mind doesn't know what's out These are tied with the hottest ones ever had in my life, which was up in Ohio So I'm also going To put these wings With that little bit of sauce there in here as well This this is her challenge because you know, we didn't know if we could find the hottest which we couldn't It's pretty spicy So I had to do it so this was this one won't do Freezers so I'm going to point you down here just for a minute This is the one drop does it okay, well one drop We're going to the hospital. All right Whoa, that came off fast Oh Extra hot she got out of the elevator at the door crack for so she didn't have to fumble with the key card She walks in I can smell that down the elevator. So here we go.   So what I want to do is I'm going to take a bite of some of the noodles and one whole chicken Let me get some water Now he's thinking for the water This really ate me up man at the at the restaurant His eyes were watering my kids just started going Oh, yeah The girl says I warned you I warned you so where'd you go? Oh That's why since she's not what I talked to you Anyway, that's why we missed your life feed on Facebook because we was at Maze Yeah, but it was nicer. It's got a lot of bad reviews and I was like man is wasted 30 bucks 45 Because we had to pay five Oh You are going to be sorry be careful. What's the noise in the background the microwave? That was a microwave I put it on for another night But yeah, I was worried about the reviews It was it was nice everything was good anything I'd like to see more food Because all they had was their thing and they just some chips nachos and cheese and hot dogs That was pretty much it but they did have pop of water which is okay, but I didn't kind of ride Oh boy, I couldn't stand on it Two seconds. That was funny A girl did better than I did a young girl. I know that one like 13 She started to stay down a lot of time back in her home But well soon I jumped on it though.  She didn't know it was gonna be hot Hey, right She's looking for the way to relax on it right now So if I don't want to get up in the light, I'm like, you know, this is on it, right? Why no? Yeah, it's on my day, right had zombies chasing coming out and climbing on it. It was really cool Yeah, and the haunted house also had a haunted house there. It was neat, but yeah I thought it was really cool. She screamed all the way through it Of course made me go first I only got started once but that doesn't mean I don't have fun, you know, because I love haunted houses Yeah Let me get this out here. I won't drop by to this Somebody else came. You have two Welcome to the Shade Bear All right. Oh my god This is It's gonna be bad.  I can do a live stream on my train store. Oh What what time Yeah, we're in the truck Yeah, we can put in listening and I can watch Yeah, we check out about 11 o'clock Yeah Yeah, so it doesn't really matter whatever time you want to do it So let's know and we'll catch it We go over You're on at the same time. Hello at the same time Yeah, I'm in red. This is Steve But I thought I got out of it because we went to Walmart right after we got the bowls There's a two burner stay up here. There's a microwave refrigerator sink.  We're on at the same time. What's that? Hello, YouTube Hello, how's it? Hello Murray. Welcome to this show. I warn you this will be hilarious laughing out loud and then I thought we got out of it because we didn't pick up any forks I said I have kind of a dilemma on issues with what I said not need what she goes There's forks in the truck Who carries?  What's up? I'm not eating No, I'm just I'm doing a challenge Okay, it's hot noodle. It's happy. Hello Nancy's telling me it's happy. Hello By the way, hello, it's happy. I'm gonna be mister I'm happy in a moment grumpy And I didn't break the noodles up before cooked Man, this is It's gonna be bad. It's gonna be hotter than the regular stuff. I just know it is gotta be I don't know that thing got air in it Hey, let's see if you can eat that whole thing Got the noodles That's good That's gonna see It's happy I'm just happy These girls crying, you know Talk amongst yourself for a minute Why eat slowly Kids in self is in trouble See this is what I get Okay, Shay, there you go Alright Nancy I tried that it was awful Yeah, but I put the hottest wings I've ever had in my life on here in here and also added this hot sauce Extra hot And this fire sauce is all in here and I'm just dipping that sauce there I hope you're slipping in the truck You're sleeping on a gurney, I don't know Here we go guys Let's do this You're gonna fart flames I already have Can you handle it? No You okay? Are you a wife?   Have you seen the hot wing video with Jack Black?  That's hotter than the peppers I did Really? I threw in the peppers Shaber, you will be in bed tomorrow Forget going anywhere tomorrow Yeah, but we'll watch your video Maybe if he makes it I might be watching from the emergency room Well, we're in your place, Gainesville's full of doctors The emergency's right up the road, remember? We saw it on the way to the thing Are you still on fire?  Oh, hell no I had to be here first And now I eat like ten of them things It's getting worse Monkey, monkey, ah Don't pick on him Oh, jeez, he deserves it I love you I have to take my dog out We'll be back in a few minutes I know that Yeah, I'll have two here But anyway, because I can't smoke in here I smoke outside And we're not on the balcony Even though we're on the third floor He's tired Oh, jeez Hear that?    Bases were all made up And they had saws And all kinds of stuff And then we went on the haunted house I was just I carried him though He shaked a little bit He didn't bark at him Except for that one time The first The guy that jumped out in the corn maze Yeah, the corn maze But the chainsaw kind of went up at her He was just protecting her He was like And then the guy pet him And then Bruno was like Oh, it's a game I only barked at one Like I said, he thought he was protecting us It's funny But the thing was that you had to go through people To be able to get even in there Because we had to pay And Nobody said a word Until near the end Unbelievable Grabbing a suit and walking out People would pet him They loved him Hey, is that your dog? Yeah I should have said No, I just sold it off When you do these challenges You need to have something like ice cream Or crackers nearby For a rescue Maybe crackers, but again But you can't have that Ice cream, little lactose things I can take those lactate pills Some tongues, too Well, I did make some tongues She said a Walmart I'm ready to get a ladder Because this place is packed So I'm ready to get a ladder She said you want some tongues I'm like nah, I just want to get a ladder I'm a busy Walmart I tell ya I've been in some busy mushrooms Christmas Thanksgiving When everybody goes into the store For Black Friday Or whatever it is That's what it reminded me of today It was like Ugh I felt claustrophobic I was ready to get out of there myself I was not happy I think you need to eat more noodles Noodles, too I will if you try one I think that was a big buy And a big piece of chicken No, you don't One, two We'll go to lift something together I'm getting ready to Because she grabbed a hold of it I grabbed a hold of it The answers don't need any more We'll be left in the show One, and I'll go to pick it up And she's still counting I'm like, no, look We've got our hands on it We'll just pick the damn thing up I know, guys work with it all the time One, two I don't want to count to three Because I have to do it with my patience To get them out of the wheelchair So I count one, two, three So they know I'm getting ready to pick them up You know what I mean? So then they're prepared Okay, but I'm prepared When I grab a hold of it It's important that you should be on watch next This is just wrong I need something to drink Oh, I thought you were on purpose Are you a chicken?  Yeah, my niece has got something Going on Some kind of food challenge That she wants him to do I got those hundred year old eggs And I ate one last weekend Saturday night she was sleeping I ate one and got like a minute of the video But I didn't get it I think I told them that I didn't eat the whole thing I took one bite But I took half of it It wasn't that bad But I got the gag in a little bit When I looked at it It wasn't the taste It was just, you know, green But it didn't taste bad But so I got to do that one again Which is She can, you know, laugh I'm sure she could But trying to get her to do the coke challenge Then suck down the coke And try not to burp The first one at Burps loses There you go guys Monkey Read what I said before the last post I need one with you and monkey He's not feeling good Eat that Let me ask you I'm back I'm moving I took another bite She had the doggy out She was the doggy Musta makes a good one I got to go I'm sorry, I got to go guys Thanks for hanging out and being here so late Hospital bed I don't need more of that I don't Bye Take care Thanks for watching We appreciate it We're going to go Nancy Thanks for watching Enjoy your caboose Yeah, we'll watch a feed tomorrow Just kind of like give us a heads up Before you do it so that way We'll know And we'll We'll tune in for you Or tune in with you on that I said shaker needs to change his sub Sub button The one he has Up there is a sad one Oh, do you have a sad one? I'm checking it out But right now I definitely I literally got to go Alright, I love you guys Thanks for watching Nancy We'll tune in to you tomorrow Alright, thanks guys Have a good night See you soon Bye-bye Bye-bye Shit Shoot


2019 marks the 30th birthday of the World Wide Web. In those 30 years the world has changed a lot, not in the least because of the web. The web has changed the way in which we communicate, in which we find information about things, in which we learn things, also the way in which business is done all over the globe. And to me the most important thing of the web is that it is something for everyone. When Tim Berners-Lee created the web his idea was that it should work for anyone regardless of where you come from, where you're now, where you're going. This independence of anything was the most important thing. It was about connecting people, about sharing information. Unfortunately as you know the web is under threat these days from different angles. One of the most important problems is that we have lost control of our personal data in our online and offline lives. And actually this is something that worries me, I guess a lot of you as well, maybe that's why you're here. It also worries Tim Berners-Lee himself because this is not why he created the web. Fortunately there is a plan, an idea of how to solve things and that plan is a project, a mission called SOLID. So I'm here to talk about SOLID today and with SOLID we aim to reshape the relationship that people have with their data and the applications that they use. And fundamentally SOLID is about choice. We want to get back to that web where we can choose whatever we want to do independently of the large platforms that are there. So today let's talk about universality and innovation, main drivers behind the original vision of the web. Let's then have a look at the web of the future, what a new relation between apps, data and people should look like. And finally let's of course also talk about development, how will the developer experience change if we make all of these things happen. First of all of course, let's talk about the web. Let's talk about the role of centralization in the history of the web and let's talk about a main problem that we have today which are of course the walled gardens. So 30 years is a long time, maybe too long for many of us to remember the world before the web. But what happened before the web was very hard to exchange information because there was high heterogeneity around the world. There was different hardware that people use, different softwares, it was very hard to communicate. It was also very hard to innovate because if you wanted to build software for which machines would you build, for which platforms would you build, right, those were hard questions these days. So the main thing that the web changed was universality. The web strived to be universal because it was independent of many things and anyone in this room and everywhere else can use the web regardless of the hardware you're using. You can use it from a laptop or from a mobile device. You can also use it with whatever operating system you want, with whatever browser, the choice is yours. And this was a real revolution that the web has brought. This is very great for innovation because instead of wondering which system to pick, you just build for the web and it works everywhere. At least that's a philosophy. And how this works is through standards that provide the needed interoperability. The web, because of these things, brings freedom of expression to everyone across the world. And the principle there is that anyone can say anything about anything. And it has given a voice to many people who didn't have such a voice before. And the good thing is we all have our own spaces on the web. Everyone can create a website, you can set your opinion and I don't have to agree with it, you're free to do so and no one controls that. And if you want to discuss the opinion of someone else, well, we can link to them. We don't have to copy them, we can just point to it even though we might agree or disagree with them. The other side of freedom of expression is that of course people started doing that, they started exercising their rights, they started writing their own blogs and websites, sharing things from wherever they wanted to share them. So there was a very good time about creativity. Unfortunately, that time seems to be a bit behind us, given what's currently happening, I'll talk more about that in a bit. What I have seen because of that revolution is lots of social platforms, if you still remember, what is it, 15 years ago, things like delicious for sharing bookmarks, flicker for sharing pictures and so on. So there were platforms that were enabling the independence that people had and they were enabling them in sharing content because they made it so much easier. The other side of it is that the web also made innovation easy. Because anyone can build anything for any reason, it's like the developer's equivalent of freedom of speech. And this is called permission-less innovation because you can develop whatever you want, you don't depend on hardware, software, you just build for the web. So you don't need anyone's permission to join the web and launch a new idea. And if you say, well, of course, think again, because in app stores that's not the case. You depend on the centralized party to have your app approved, right? So the web is completely different in that regard. Permission-less innovation has been responsible for crazy ideas, things that 15, 20 years ago seemed like pure sense fiction, but nowadays are pretty normal. I took an Uber to get here, of course I did. What else would I have known, right? And this shows the power of universality and permission-less innovation. Now, of course, this has some assumptions about whether or not there are central parties. So let's talk about history of centralization and decentralization. When the web started, decentralization was actually the default assumption. Many things were decentralized back then, the internet, email, and so on. So that's not new about the web. What was new about the web is universality, the fact that the decentralize system would work with many platforms. And the first threat to this universality started with the browser wars. If you still remember around, well, the end of the 90s, the 2000s, if you didn't have internet explorer, well, you're out of luck, that's the one browser you need. But this means that you were obliged to start buying certain kind of computers that would be capable of running this software, otherwise you would be excluded from the web. And this also means as a developer you depended on Microsoft for your speed of innovation. So even things like obliging people to use a certain browser can have a very big impact on the ecosystem. So the universality is important. So how did the browser wars end? Well, they never really ended. They just got replaced by another war. Because at some point it didn't matter any more which browser you were using. What mattered was the first page that you used to get on the web. And that means that, well, if you're not on Google as a company, you're out of luck. So this means that we see that ranking in search engine is certainly a target and not great content. This again provides a danger. It also means that if you as a developer want to innovate, well, you better make sure that whatever you do ranks highly on Google. If not, there's no point. So again, that's another way of how innovation is impacted by centralization. It didn't really. It just got replaced by yet another battle. And these are, of course, the platform wars that are still ongoing today. You're not on Facebook while you're out of luck. There's a couple of things you cannot use because you only have to sign in with Facebook. And what we saw is that clicks certainly became much more important than having high quality content. So this has totally shaped the way that we use the web. And for developers, it means that while you either compete on Facebook, if you also try to harvest lots of data, or you depend on Facebook because you need people to log in with Facebook on your website, otherwise they will not join. So this coples your innovation to their innovation. And this is not great for universality, privacy, or innovation. So let's do a bit on this last topic of the walled gardens that are created by such social media. And by the way, I don't aim to pick on any platform in particular. This is happening to the web with a couple of examples. So what happened today is that our data has become centralized and only a handful of platforms on the web. What used to be on people's personal blogs a couple of years ago is now on Facebook, is now on Twitter. And of course, those platforms, they must be credited for providing a great user experience. But at the same time, we have lost control of the web. This has far-reaching consequences for privacy. I don't have to tell you that.  However, it also endangers the web's universality. And this is bad for all developers who want to build things on the web.  Like, hey, it works better with a native app. The great thing about the web was that finally we could use one piece of software to browse all information of the world. Now that we have had this for 30 years, what do we do? We start using specific apps again to browse information. So this is kind of a big step backwards if you think about it. This creates the walled gardens because what those social networks and other networks on the web do is they harvest data. Their main business model is getting better. This creates a situation where, for instance, I cannot share a photo on Facebook with my colleagues on LinkedIn. I have to either move the data or move the people. And this creates those gardens where you have to really climb across them in order to be able to share content. This is not the web. On the web I could just link to things and there were no barriers before. Of course, the main problem here is that this massive centralization, it also hurts the choice that people have. And let's be honest, if you have a budget and time to build one API integration, will you choose Facebook.com or will you choose a very specific provider with lots of privacy? I mean, there's a market reality. We have to follow what is happening, obviously. So this means that developers start depending on such centralized platforms for data and identity. And if you don't want to depend on them, well, you have to become one of them, that's the reality. So people lose control of their data and it's very hard to switch to other apps because if you switch to another app, well, too bad because your data is left behind. So this means that even if you have great ideas for innovation, people are locked in. So you cannot convince them as easily to move around. And this brings us back to the irony of permissionless innovation because you can ask like, hey, how did this happen? Didn't we have this great idea that we could build whatever we want? And I think that this innovation is so permissive that it even allows platforms that go against this idea. And I think it was very beautifully phrased in The Guardian where they said that the Facebook founder has no intention of allowing anyone to build anything on his platform that does not have his express approval. Having profited mightily from the web's openness, he has kicked away the letter that elevated him to his current eminence. I think it's really, really beautiful metaphor and if you see the web as a native platform you see all those letters that people are getting because of the web and then you build a platform, climb on top and you just kick it away because it's not needed anymore. And that's kind of what happened, unfortunately. However, let's not keep on talking too much about the past and all the problems. They're there. We know about them. Let's have a look at a different way to do things that might prevent what's happening today. So I'll talk about SOLID and the most important thing there is choice. We want to give people back the choice that has always been theirs on the web. So the SOLID ecosystem enables people to pick the applications, the websites and so on that they want to use while at the same time giving them the opportunity to store their data wherever they want and that's the new thing. So this means that people can control their data and they can share it with the apps and the people that they choose. How does this work concretely? Well, this is a view that we're all very familiar with today. It's a social media post and how this would work today is that all of the pieces of data that built this view, they're stored in a single centralized space. What we're saying here is that you will get the choice to store your data wherever you want. So concretely, if this is my social media post, well this profile picture there, it's mine. So I store it in my data space in my data pod. My name, of course, mine is also stored there. The text itself is also stored in my data space. If you place a comment on my message, well, this comment is yours. Your data space, the picture is yours. Your data space. If someone else replies to your comments, well it goes in their data space. I think you get the picture. Even a piece of data as small as a like, if you say this is yours, and it can be stored on your data space. So you can choose for whatever piece of data you create where it is stored. And this creates a very different world. So first I briefly look at what we have today. In essence, the problem that we have is that data and applications are coupled together. So when we say Facebook, when we say LinkedIn, we mean my Facebook and my LinkedIn because it's the data that they have about me in an application. And this has a couple of problems. As I said before, it's very hard to share data across things. Another terrible problem is synchronization. If, for instance, I indicate on Facebook I'm going to this event, well, then Doodle won't know about it or Mike Hellner won't know about it. So because data is closely tied to the applications, you have this constant synchronization problem and you can share across boundaries. So that's what happens with data silos. But what if we push the data out of the data silos? The applications on this side don't contain any data because the data is in people's personal data pots. And this completely changes the picture because I can pick any application. I can, for instance, start with a social feed. I can post a picture and a picture is stored in my personal pot. And then when I open a photo gallery application, well, I can view the same picture. So there's no need to synchronize it. There's only one copy of it, really. And this switching between apps is really important. Now, this is great for privacy, obviously, because I can control what apps get to see my data. It's also very great for a choice because now I can pick any app I want. If I don't like an app, I can move. If I don't like my data provider, I can move. So that's a story for people. There's also a very intriguing story for developers because this is what you have today. We have a single market for centralized apps where the competition is based on data ownership. Here on this site, whoever has most data will win. It doesn't matter how good you are, just get the most data you can. This is really bad because if someone has a creative idea, they have trouble entering the market. Suppose you invent something really simple. It's called a slider of disagreement. It's a feature that we want. We want to indicate on the social feeds to see more or less content we disagree with, filter bubbles and stuff. It's a feature everyone wants if you build it while tough luck. You will never get an option because you cannot enter the market since you don't have the data. This is what happens when you have a competition based on data ownership. Very bad for innovation. Indeed, if you think about it, can you name me any feature that Facebook or Twitter or LinkedIn have built in the past five years that really have drastically changed your life? You probably can't. They don't have to innovate to have the data already. If you want to innovate too bad, you don't have the data. This changes when we move data out of apps and to your people because then you get a separate competition between data storage and applications. And this is not a competition where the winner takes everything. This is a competition where multiple things can coexist. Here, I can pick my app independently of my storage provider. And the app that I like might be different from the app that you like. So you pick whatever you like, I pick what I like, and it still works. Also, storage-wise, we might have choices. Like, I might want to store my data in the cloud, you might want to store it in your basement on your own server. All of those things become possible. And this will also change the way we think about markets because right now you cannot choose. You can't say, hey, I will pay you 10 bucks a month if you don't mind my data. Well, you cannot do that. Here I expect there will be lots of choice. And just to give you an example of how interesting it will be, I expect that there will be free providers of data storage, but there will probably be minor data, there will be the terms and conditions. I expect there will be paying solutions and they will not mind my data. I even expect there to be a solution. So, if I choose my data there, then, of course, they will definitely mind my data. And this just shows how much choice there can be, such an ecosystem with two markets, and the kind of innovations that you can have there. So, this is a theory on how it works on a higher level. Let's have a concrete look at what is there in a solid ecosystem. So, SOLID is a project started by Tim Berners-Lee, and it's much bigger than that. It's, in fact, a lot of people working on these things and sharing these values. So, it's not a company, it's an organization, it's not just software either. It's an ecosystem, it's a movement, it's a community. An ecosystem, in the sense that SOLID, one of the main tasks we have, is defining standards for interoperability. And we try to define as few standards as we can. So, what we mostly do is reusing existing web standards, existing W3C standards to enable these kind of things. So, it's not a new web, it's the existing web with a couple of existing standards that we bring together. SOLID is also a movement in the sense that we want to shift the way that apps are being built. Because nowadays, as a developer, you depend on data to succeed. Like if people join your application, you need to first ask them lots of questions to get the data, and one of your biggest tasks is collecting data. But what if you don't keep the data that you access people's data that they provide to you? They can skip all those data harvesting tasks and focus on what you're really good at. And finally, SOLID is also a community, so there's different people in there, there's different companies, organizations trying to make SOLID into something great. Because SOLID is based on standards, anyone can build or host software for SOLID. So this means that you don't have to be a server at your workplace. There's open-source software for that, so nothing stops you from doing that. You can run service space somewhere, you can use one of the three community servers, all of those things are possible. So a lot of choice there. Now, the SOLID server, what is it exactly? Well, it acts as a data plot, personal storage of any kind of data, it stores it and it will guard your data. And in fact, a SOLID server is just stored for link data. And I will explain link data in just a bit. The SOLID server is completely application agnostic, so you can build any kind of application with it, you're not restricted to specific domains. All the application-specific logic resides inside of the client applications. And in a way, a SOLID server is just like your website. This is nothing totally new or revolutionary. It's just like the old days where you would start your own website and it's just like the pages, it's composed of elementary pieces of data. That's the only difference. But conceptually, it's like just getting your own website. What kind of data is inside of a SOLID plot? Well, anything you can imagine. Like it's your personal data store, whatever you want to store there. But I'm thinking specifically of profile data, pictures, comments, likes, anything you do online or offline, you can store there. It's your space, it's your space. What are clients then? Well, SOLID clients are browser apps or perhaps native apps that read from your pod or write data to your pod. So what can we have? Well, the idea is that you give app-specific permissions. So you say, look, this app is, for instance, photo apps. You can only see my photos. Don't touch any of my other personal data. Friends can give you permission to access things. So if one of my apps is free, then I can use any of my apps to have a look at their pics. And what those apps do is they deliver a unified experience. So you can browse your friends' pictures along with yours. Like if they use totally different applications to create pictures, it doesn't matter. You use your apps and you have a seamless experience of everything in your network. If you think about it, this is kind of how computers in general run. And then I use whatever program I have to open those files. Well, it's very similar, except it's for the web. So what kind of apps can we build? Well, this is where your creativity comes in. Anything you can envision, you can build with SOLID. Just like you can build anything for the web. Permissionless innovation, right? So calendars, social feeds, photo sharing apps, perhaps even a system to organize conferences like this one, all of those things are available. So you can build it with SOLID. So that's about the ecosystem. Let's also talk about the community of people making things happen and what is the current state of all of these things. Well, also the SOLID server is there. There's several apps. And I would say at the moment, don't let the general public look at it. It's very around the edges. But as a developer, you can already go there and start building things. So there's a lot of places such as those two where you can store your data.  It doesn't really matter. I, for instance, I have my own server. Application-wise, we have a data browser. We have contacts apps, photos apps, and so on. So all of the things you would expect. Now, the difference is that these apps don't work with one single backend. They work with the other ones. And, of course, we also have a couple of software libraries that make it easy for developers to build on top of SOLID. For instance, authentication is there, data processing, so all the low-level stuff you need to get started. Now, SOLID is currently transitioning. It used to be a research project under MIT Wings. Now it's becoming much bigger. And there's also a startup within the ecosystem that tries to kickstart it. So it starts with MIT as a research prototype. But the truth is, and I'm a researcher myself, in research, once you prove it works, you have to move on. So there's no time for building things like a user experience, production-grade software, and so on. So this is why it's a good idea that it's taken to the next level. And one of those startups is called Interrupt. And it's a startup that Tim Berners-Lee himself called Interrupt. And now we want to maintain a couple of common building blocks as open source. We want to create tools for developers. And we want to offer services and apps. Now, it's very important to understand that these things are different, because I've heard some people being very concerned about this. So you have this ecosystem, and now there's a startup and you're going to take your data again, and you're going to have to do business in there. We have to do that. And I'm an academic myself, I don't care too much about business, but if you don't do that, it doesn't work. You need a couple of companies to drive the ecosystem, to make sure that commercial things are being built as well. And I think that by showing, yes, there is economic value in such a way of thinking as well, that there's a lot of difference about maintaining production, great software and so on. So interrupt is now taking on that role for the ecosystem. However, very importantly, interrupt, as the only company with Insolid is never going to work. Like we need competition to grow there. Because remember when I was talking about the two markets, the whole idea is based on competition.  But the whole goal of this is that there comes competition to the ecosystem that there's different companies with different views trying to build this for everyone. While there's a time I look like while a couple of years ago 2014 was the start of the common UX experience. So if you want to start building on Solid, it's now a lot easier. And we hope that in some months we'll have an MVP of the ecosystem that not just works for developers, but also works for regular people so we can send anyone there to try and have fun with it. And maybe as of today, if you like what I'm talking about, you can also become involved and this is a new step for the Solid UX part. How does development on top of Solid work? Well, there's two things we need to talk about. On the one hand, the way APIs and clients work is obviously going to change substantially. And then we also need to look at, given these changed circumstances, how we should start developing web apps. So what you have currently is if you look at what developers do, they're building apps that are going to be built together in the same way. And on the other hand, they're going to build apps. Well, I will build a backend and a frontend and they will work together, but X will not work with any other backend and the backend itself will probably not work with any other application. So this is how we build things today. It's all reinventing the wheel basically. And this is easy because we exactly know what's going to happen. So this app will need data from different sources, but they are the same source that the other app will work from. So this is more ecosystem thinking than the other side. So we need to start agreeing on things. We need to make things work together, like see the bigger picture. And indeed, if you look at the current approach of building APIs, well, that doesn't really work well with a backend. So this will be very specific for an application. It will be very specific for a certain backend. So all of the requests in there make a lot of assumptions on how things work, how the backend works, and so on and so forth. And this is not sustainable because first of all with Solet, with this way of thinking, there will be multiple servers. So this privilege connection you don't have. And also, who says what should we actually do is not possible. We have to transition into something else. I think this is what it will look like. So basically the application specific logic will become quite a bit smaller. And in this logic we will not start doing HTTP requests directly because we don't know where to send those requests and we don't know what those requests should look like. So what I think is that we'll see clients that have a query engine that has a lot of information, a lot of information, a lot of information that we can provide queries. So you don't tell where data should be found, you just tell what it is that you want to see. It's up to this library to then translate this into concrete HTTP requests, but you don't have to care about this. And this also means that the ecosystem is at liberty to change interfaces, to have access to all of the components. But the good thing is that this library will be reused across multiple clients so we only have to write once basically. Now, since there will be lots of data on different places, interoperability is going to be crucial. And in fact you'll notice that there's quite a lot of initiatives that look a bit like solids and that's true. This ID by itself is not extremely new, it's a lot of data. In fact, the way that we're currently approaching apps is the crazy way of doing things, like who said that in order to use an app we have to push our data there. There's quite some initiatives with the same goal like keep your data, reuse apps. However, from what I see is that solid is the maybe the only one actually strongly focusing on interoperability. I see many examples of this. How is the real problem interoperability? How are we going to ensure that each app works with each data pod that you can find online? So here are some challenges that we have to counter. Because if we need, if we all store our own data wherever we want, how can we connect it to other people's data? And how can apps share data without having to agree on everything first? Like the photo, a like, a comment or is it possible that we are thinking differently about that? And finally, how do we integrate data from multiple data pods? Because at every point in time applications will need to start harvesting data from different places. Well, those challenges in solid, we solve them through linked data in the RDF form. So let me explain how that works. Linked data is nothing special. It is the cornerstones of the web, which are URLs and links. For instance, this piece of data, which looks a lot like JSON, is me liking this edition of FOSDEM. But how did I do that? Because if you go to this home page, you will see that there is no like but I still liked it anyway. Now the good thing is this is my piece of data. So I created it. I store it in my personal data space. But how can I still store it? So this is URL for me. This is URL for FOSDEM. And this is me saying, hey, I like this thing out there on the web. And this is a real like. I created it. It is as good as anything else except I am in control and I can store it wherever I want. So this is how we connect information from different places on the web together. And even though they are stored in different places, we can store it in different places. The other thing is about interoperability. And there is a lot of things to be said about it. But what we are focusing on nowadays is recognizing shapes. And if you have an application that wants to work with social feeds, all you have to do is recognize this particular shape. It is a like given by a certain person for a certain object at a certain time. That is all you have to do. And this like could, for instance, have much more attributes or could have comments attached to it and so on. Or maybe even have a picture attached to it. It doesn't matter. Your app only has to recognize one specific ship. So this means that if you are building application for SOLID, you don't have to know everything in the SOLID ecosystem. If you only care about likes, you don't care about that. So SOLID is not one big specification of how everything should look like. It is small specifications you can mix and match whatever you want. So if you just want to do likes, well, recognizing this shape is sufficient. Final question, if data comes from many different places, how do you combine it? Well, that's a nice thing. You can just concatenate data from different sources. So this is my like. This is another person's point because we're all using your rise and we're using the same ships. So these things show why link data is a good way of approaching a decentralized environment of different data stores. Which brings me to the final point is as developers, how will we build apps on top of that? And what we've realized is that the developer experience is going to be the most crucial factor to have success But in fact for anything and we've also learned is that we should really pay attention to front-end developers Because they're the ones building the apps that people see and together with UX designers They bring solid to people so as a solid community, we shouldn't in my opinion try to focus too much and to answer Well, we'll build the back ends will build the specs will build the applications. I don't think that's really our job Because frankly I want to back end myself. I don't know what the user wants So the idea is that we want to enable developers to build things on top of solid instead of doing it ourselves But of course by enabling developers to build nice things we also enable ourselves So that's a very strong argument for investing in developer experience because this is the way that we can make an ecosystem spread Like if we give developers the seats to start building themselves it will be so much faster and better If we just give them applications as an example and then say well if you want to build something just build something Now making sure that they have a great experience while building decentralized apps is very important That said building decentralized apps is a bit more complex than centralized apps because you don't control the back end You don't control the data model so we need to think about a very good experience there And for me I think it's very important to make sure that the simple things are simple but that the complex things are manageable Because honestly link data has reputation for being complex but there's a very nice quote I think that hits to the core of this People think RDF is a pain because it is complicated however the truth is much worse RDF is painfully simplistic but it allows you to work with real world data and problems that are horribly complicated So indeed decentralized environments are complex, data is everywhere, different shapes, different formats It's much easier to be in a centralized space so we should remind ourselves that yes we're tackling a complex problem However if we succeed in making the simple things simple then we're quite good Now the link data developer experience that I've seen over the past couple of years was following the way of JSON APIs And what is that way? Well simple, you gather some input from the user then you send a specific API call to your back end You parse the JSON response, you traverse the JSON tree structure and then finally you obey the dog This is very classical old school JSON And if we make that the RDF equivalent, well we gather data into a query, we send the query to the server We get RDF back, we parse it, we traverse the graph and then we obey the dog However this is horribly complicated and this is not what the cool kids are doing nowadays And what are the cool kids doing? Well they're doing things like React, Vue.js, Angular and so on So if you want any chance of succeeding we of course have to be there We have to think of what the link data experience would look like in these frameworks And here's an example of what link data looks like in React For instance I can say welcome dear user and give their first name I can show their profile picture by just adding the simple components I can give them a link to their inbox, to their homepage, I can give them a list of their threads So this whole five step process forget about it, just declaratively say what it is that you want Just play it to the user and that's it Now you might notice those tiny expressions in there, I call them micro query expressions And they're very crucial to make things happen There's quite some magic behind them because they look very simple, they look like just JSON objects Actually every one of those expressions, every single one is going to the web to get data So how does it work? Well it's a language called LDFlex And LDFlex tries to expose link data without the complexities of RDF And RDF is the underlying model of link data So you can see things like give me the user's name, give me the user's friends Give me the first name of the user's friends, give me the first name of the friends of the user And go to a random thing out of the web and find their blog So these are just data expressions for getting things online So at this point you could say like who, you just invented yet another query language Congrats, why couldn't you reuse? Well actually it's not just a query language LDFlex is a domain specific language for JavaScript This means that every expression is actually just a JavaScript expression So data.user.friend.firstname is plain JavaScript And now here's the trick, it feels like a local object It feels like traversing a JSON graph in memory However underneath it uses proxy which can do basically magic to any property So what's actually happening is that this expression will behave like a web query If you put a weight keyword in front of it What will happen is that the LDFlex software will go on the web Will go find a list of your friends from your data pots Will then go to your friends data pots and get their names So a very simple forward expression like this one actually hides a query on the web And this is how we can make the simple things really simple And I think that small inventors like this one are crucial to provide a nice developer experience to Solem So we've talked about universality and innovation Why it is so important that we go back to the core values of the web We've talked about a new way to think about apps, data and people We want to build apps in such a way that the data is controlled by the people, not by the app Now we talked about decentralized development, how it's significantly more complex But it can be managed with the right developer experience So given all of this, what would I expect the future to look like? He built it and that became the future However, Tim himself actually prefers this slight alteration of the quote The best way to invent the future is to predict it Think about that for a second We can say what we want the future to look like And I want the future to look like this I don't want apps to own our data I want to re-control our own data that we can choose apps that we want This is what we with SOLID want the world to look like This is what we predict And the next step is to invent those things that we feel are necessary to make it happen So they include standards, they include software implementations They also include developer experience So all of you can help us invent that future But truly thought, I don't think that our main problems are technology In fact, there's many more to tackle SOLID will need a very diverse community in order to be successful And I say diversity, I'm talking in the first place about different people Coming from different places, with different backgrounds, with different views on a problem That's important I'm also talking about a very specific skill set and a very diverse skill set As Tim Riesli said himself, we should assemble the brightest minds From business, technology, government, civil society, the arts and academia To tackle the threats to the web's future Because this is not just something only for developers Even though we play an important part in that I think if we succeed, this is something that's going to be very important to everyone Thank you


I'm having a Donald moment, don't ask, it's my turn to eat humble pie, humble pie because I have mispronounced two words, two complete words in the last 230 videos I've made. I first of all am grateful to all of you who had written copiously to inform me that I had mispronounced these words. I stand corrected. Fish have gills, not gills. If they are somatic narcissistic fish, they may have a few gills lying around, but all of them have gills, and so do we as embryos. Second thing, a thin slice in modern accepted pronunciation is sliver, not sliver as I had mispronounced it. So you see, I'm a modest person. I acknowledge my mistakes. Today we are going to discuss, by the way, had I been modest, had I been truly modest, I would have been perfect. So today we are going to discuss two issues which I trust you may find of interest. The first one is the shared fantasy of this somatic narcissist, and the second one is how do narcissists brainwash codependence. It's a highly attuned and specific process known clinically as entraining, and search as I might and as I've tried all over the internet. I couldn't find a single video that described the process of entraining between a narcissist and a codependent, so this is going to be probably a first. Now before we get to the somatic narcissist shared fantasy, many people have difficulties getting to grasps with the concept of shared fantasy. Shared fantasy is simply another name for co-idealization. Co-idealization is a process whereby the narcissist idealize a potential source of supply and later an intimate partner so as to make it possible for himself to idealize himself. So he idealizes his partner. His partner is perfect, she's brilliant, she's the most beautiful woman on earth, she's an amazing cook, she's great in bed, she's this, she's that, and that makes him special because if his partner is special and unique and unprecedented and without peer, peerless, etc. etc. then the narcissist is equally unique and special and peerless. It's a process of co-idealization and idealizing the partner helps the narcissist to idealize himself. Now many, many women who end up with narcissists equally tend to idealize their partners, either they are narcissistic or they are borderline, borderlines also have a false self, or there are certain types of co-dependence. This this subspecies of co-dependent needs to idealize her partner in order to derive from the partner what she needs. Or there's a general need to idealize the male partner. It's socially and culturally mandated to say you know my man is the best, my husband is the best, and you you come across these flinging matches between women comparing their men to each other. Either they devalue their men collectively or they tend to idealize their men collectively. So at any rate co-idealization means that the woman needs to idealize the man in order to be with him and the narcissistic man needs to idealize his woman in order to be with her. Now I'm saying man and woman because I'm always as always I'm taking an idealized heterosexual couple but this equally applies to homosexual couples, lesbian couples, transgender couples. The dynamic inside the couple is pretty identical between the intimate partners on condition that one of them is a narcissist. So the narcissist idealizes his partner and his partner idealizes him back. The reason the only reason for transitioning from the shared fantasy to other phases like the bargaining phase, the main reason is when there's a failure of co-idealization. When one of the parties fails to idealize the other either because reality is too overwhelming and does not allow for confirmation bias, reality is too much. I mean you can idealize that to a point. You can even be delusional, you can even self-deceive but there's a limit even to this. If reality is too much presents too many challenges and countervailing information and data it's difficult to idealize. So this is one reason and the second reason is that the partner pushes to de-idealize, to devalue. We'll discuss that at some other time but when there's a failure of co-idealization the shared fantasy unravels in ways that I've described in previous videos. One of the reasons that I failed to mention in previous videos, one of the reasons that women end up betraying or cheating the narcissist is because they need to reassure themselves that they are normal. You see the narcissist drives his intimate partner to an ultimate level of insecurity. The narcissist partner feels that she doesn't know herself anymore, that she is a strange, that she is alien. She looks at herself and she says is he right about me? Am I that bad? Am I that defective? Am I that deformed? Am I that evil? Am I that vicious and malicious? Am I, am I, am I? The narcissist creates via a process of ambient abuse and gas lighting in some cases, if he's psychopathic, gas lighting. The narcissist creates a sphere, an environment of extreme uncertainty and this uncertainty pervades even self-knowledge. So the intimate partner is not sure anymore who she is. Her very identity is challenged and fractured and disintegrates. She has no parameters, clear objective parameters as to how she should behave, how her acts, in which ways her actions impact the world, what should be the consequences of her behavior or misbehavior. She is totally lost. The narcissist creates a cloud of insecurity within which she meanders. There's no path. And so because she is so lost, she sometimes needs to resort to a normal man, a non-narcissistic man, in order to ascertain, in order to make sure that she is normal, that she is okay, that she is the stable, mature party, that it is the narcissist who is distorting reality, who is deflecting information via a self-serving, self-interested lens, that it is the narcissist who has no access to his emotions and has no empathy and therefore totally fails to grasp and understand what it is to be human. She needs to reassert herself as a normal person with a coherent and cohesive identity.  She misses all that within the shared fantasy. The shared fantasy is a kind of ectoplasm. It's a kind of emanation from the narcissist's mind. It's a miasmic, twilight zone projection. It's the narcissist's mind writ large and she's trapped in the shared fantasy as one is trapped in a nightmare and can't wake up. Or if you watch a really, really good horror movie and then you start a jump at every turn, this is the shared fantasy. It's not overall a pleasant experience because the intimate partner in the shared fantasy tends to lose herself. She is rendered selfless, not in the classic sense, not the opposite of selfish, but selfless, without self, without core, without identity. She feels that she is deserving and disintegrating in some murky fluid, some gory liquid. The narcissistic shared fantasy is a kind of a dark wisp, dark wisp of smoky, through a glass-darkly existence. And many, many intimate partners of narcissists need other people, need to have sex with other people, need to make love to other people, need just to talk to other people, to extricate themselves from this twilight zone gaslighting and from this entraining, which we'll discuss a bit later. When I say women cheat on the narcissist or betray the narcissist, they have to resort to other men. Even if these men are objectively inferior to the narcissist, even if these men are repulsive, they are still better than the narcissist. They are still superior to the narcissist in critical ways, because they provide a reality test they restore. They restore in the intimate partner the feeling that she knows herself and knows the world. They resuscitate the erstwhile theory of mind and theory of world demolished by the narcissist. The somatic narcissist shared fantasy has all the elements of the cerebral narcissist shared fantasy. After all, both the somatic and the cerebral are narcissists. Don't forget this critical fact. They are both narcissists. They both share 90% of the apparatus of narcissism. They come to narcissism for the same reason. They gravitate towards the narcissistic solution. They deploy narcissistic defenses for the same reasons. They have the same etiology, same causative chain of events led to the adoption of a narcissistic false self in childhood. They had been abused. They had been traumatized. They had been spoiled. They had been smothered. They had been instrumentalized and parentified. The only difference between the cerebral and the somatic is that the cerebral is highly endowed intellectually, is highly intelligent. So he uses his intelligence to obtain supply. The somatic is not the brightest star in the galaxy, but he is still a star. He is still a star as far as his body is handsome. He has good looks. He is muscular. And if he is not, he works on it. His body builds this and that. He is athletic. And he loves women. He doesn't love women, actually. He loves access to women's bodies. He desires women. He is passionate about women because they are in possession of their bodies and he needs their bodies to masturbate with. Or he needs their bodies to soil and despoil if he is a somatic, somatic narcissist. At any rate, he needs their bodies. So he is very much into women. His eyes light up when he sees a woman. The cerebral is very much not into women. The cerebral regards women as enemies, as a ratification and embodiment of the maternal principle. And the maternal principle is the principle of pain, of frustration, of engulfment and enmeshment. So the cerebral rejects women as a solution, as a narcissistic source of supply in the physical sense. He rejects sex. He rejects their sexuality and psychosexuality. The somatic, because he has no choice, not because it's his preference, but he has no alternative. He is not bright. He is not brilliant. He doesn't have 190 IQ. And he looks good. So he uses his body. That's the only difference between them. They both extract narcissistic supply and they're both obsessed with narcissistic supply. They're addicts. They're compulsive about it. Now the somatic shared fantasy, obviously, will revolve around his body. Similar to the cerebral, he looks for three functions in an intimate part. Admirer, playmate and mother. Admirer, he wants someone who will admire his body functionality.  Admiration should be overt, should be expressed, should be repeated.  A somatic is the type of man who would tell you that he is handsome and tall and imposing and amazing and how women cannot resist him when he enters a bar. A somatic is the kind of person who would bodybuild and develop visible muscles and then draw your attention to them. The somatic doesn't realize that many women are turned off by this because it indicates a high level of self-centeredness, egotism. The somatic is obviously like every narcissist. He is the center of his existence and of his being. You can never replace his self. His self is the libidinal object. He is in love essentially with himself. He is infatuated with himself. All libidinal catexes, all the investment of the life force is in himself. He is his own best, foremost, number one sexual object and in this sense a somatic is autoerotic. He needs women's bodies. He needs the bodies of his intimate partners but he needs these bodies to masturbate with, to masturbate on, to despoil and to soil.  It gives him enormous pleasure. So this is the admirer function and then there's a playmate function.   Either it is pyrotechnic, the somatic places emphasis, puts emphasis on performance. On ability, on endurance, on perseverance, on outcomes like how many orgasms did you have.   Now the most somatics usually have very mechanical and brief sex, very unsatisfying. If they pay attention to the partner, they pay attention to the partner not because they want to please her, not because they are concerned with her welfare and well-being and with her pleasure but they are concerned with the outcomes. So if they please the partner, the partner will praise them, the partner will tell them that they are the greatest lovers ever and this is what they are after. If they make the partner climax, if they give the partner multiple orgasms, this is another notch in their infinite belts. So playmate, admirer, playmate and now we come to a very crucial function, the mother. Now in the case of the cerebral narcissist, the mother function is very clear. It's a sexless function, you need to be sexless and you need to mother the narcissist the way a good enough mother would. You need to love him unconditionally, you need to accept him, all his quirks, his abuse, his misbehavior.   That's the cerebral. So the cerebral is not interested in you as a woman in the final stage. He's much more interested in you as the good enough mother he had never had.  It is a test.  And he's very stable and very faithful.  Well, in this case, you are merely a replica of his original mother and the repetition compulsion is complete. There's approach and avoidance, constant approach and avoidance intended to test you and intended to render you a good enough mother. The somatic is a different story. And that perhaps is the greatest difference between the somatic's shared fantasy and the cerebral's shared fantasy. There's nothing much differentiating the two. And by the way, many somatics are convinced that they're geniuses.  These are hulks and hulks with muscles and nothing much more than that. They have brawn but not brain. And yet they are convinced that they are, they could have taught Einstein physics and of course Stephen Hawking. So these self-styled, self-imputed genius somatics are very sorry sight indeed. But the element of the admirer and the element of the playmate in the cerebral shared fantasy and the somatic shared fantasy are pretty similar. The only difference is that the admirer and the playmate with the cerebral narcissist should compliment his brain, his intelligence, his intellect, should build upon his accomplishments real or imaginary in the field or in the intellectual field. And with the somatic, she should emphasize his body, his irresistibility and submit to his sexual preferences and orientation, which sometimes is sadistic. When we come to the mother, to the mother role of the intimate partner, there's a big difference between the two.  The somatic is turned on by insist. The cerebral is turned off by insist.  She is forbidden. And she is forbidden because she is inaccessible.  She is emotionally unavailable. She is selfish. She is narcissistic. She is depressive.  So the cerebral puts the mother on a pedestal, removes her, so to speak, from his life because she causes him endless pain and frustration. He converts her into a symbol, an emblem, an emblem, a virgin Mary. And like a virgin, she is untouchable.  And Freud was the first to notice this dichotomy, this dichotomous thinking, a form of splitting, the Madonna-Hore complex. The mother is the Madonna. All other women are whores. That is typical only, only with the cerebral. That's where Freud was mistaken. With the somatic, the idea of insist actually turns him on, exactly opposite to the cerebral. Where the cerebral would be turned off when the intimate partner becomes mother.  He becomes sexless.  Ironically, when this last stage of the shared fantasy, when you had assumed willingly or unwillingly the role of a mother, is when the somatic is likely to be all over you. He finds the idea of insist, a turn on. He is aroused by the, by incestuous thinking. Actually, he usually verbalizes incestuous phrases and, and there's roleplay. Many somatics engage in roleplay where they ask you to play the mother so that they can get aroused sexually. So there's a lot, a lot of incest, incest roleplay with somatics, because it turns them on. These are the elements of the shared fantasy of the somatic. The other stages in the shared fantasy are identical to the cerebral.  The somatic's way of testing you is not verbal abuse, it's cheating on you. That's his way of testing. Will you accept him unconditionally? Will you forgive him? Will you love him? Despite his misconduct and misbehavior, despite his betrayal and cheating which are recurrent, he's a serial cheater. So this is his way of testing you and all the rest is absolutely identical. He pushes you away. If you fail the test, you move on, or you move on to bargaining. You try to, to agree with him, to, to ask him to modify his behavior, for example, not to cheat anymore, et cetera, et cetera. In the bargaining phase, he pushes you away seriously. He pushes you to cheat actually. Or he would initiate group sex of three sons in this stage, in the bargaining stage. Or when you show signs of exiting the shared fantasy, many somatics initiate group sex in three sons and so on, because they want to denigrate you. They want to, to make you a slot.    So in the last stage of the shared fantasy, when you're showing signs that you had failed the test, that you are not willing to accept the narcissist, the somatic narcissist, cheating and betrayal and you're about to leave. You're about to abandon him. Or if you gravitate and move on to the next phase, which is the bargaining phase, and you're trying to negotiate with the somatic narcissist and modification in his behavior, you're trying to discipline him, you're trying to tame him, to domesticate him. In both cases, he would try to push you to become slottish and horish.  And then he will of course discard you.  So this is the somatic shared fantasy. I later on, during this pandemic, I seem to be going on forever. I will have a special video dedicated only to the somatic shared fantasy, but I wanted to give you the rudiments.


Alright, so the Charleston draw came out around this time yesterday and there's a lot of players playing in this one It's a big event WTA 500 event on the green clay Which is kind of weird to see when you watch the event, but some players some big names are playing It's got a big top 10 list, but some big names have also pulled out So let's go to the withdrawal list. So here are the withdrawals for Charleston We have Danielle Collins. She pulled out Simone Halop's also out Arne Lee, Martin Kober Mughalruth is pulled out, Osta Penko, Diaz, Petkovich, Ruz, Sharif, Svetolina is out and Svjantek has also pulled out of this one for obvious reasons She's just played one three of the biggest tournaments on the tour So she deserves a week off so some big names out there and okay So here is the top of the draw you can see there Sabalenka is up the very top She got a wild card She gets a buy on the first round top eight seeds get a buy in the first round Sabalenka she awaits the winner of risk versus McNally We're going out in the first round then we got Putinseva taking on a qualifier winner of that match takes on either another Qualifier or the number 15 seed and this a mova in the second round then we've got the number nine seed Keys taking on gas and over winner of that match takes on either bulk of a debts It's taken on Davis then we've got a qualifier taking on Paulini winner of that takes on the number six seed Pagola so Sabalenka is not in great form. So who does who wins who comes out of this part of the draw It's gonna be tough. I've got no idea Pagola was good last week But again, this is a clay court event. So who's gonna be well on clay? Maybe and this some over might be the one to watch out for because the Nissan Mova was a French open semi-finals a few years ago So maybe a Nissan Mova is the one to watch out for or maybe keys But yeah, I feel like you know the top seeds in this one. I don't know It's hard to pick them especially Sabalenka at the moment second part of the draw now the second quarter of the draw We've got Jabor the number four seed She gets a buy in the first round should take on either either Navarro or Bregel in the second round Then we've got Wong versus Bagu winner of that match takes on either a qualifier or the number 14 seed Tom Yanovich in the second round then we've got the number 12 seed Cornei taking on parks winner of that match takes on either Rusei or the American Baptist there then we've got Sastin bitch taking on Kalanina winner of that match takes on the number five seed Rabakina so the two big names Jabor Rabakina, I think they're the names to watch out for Rabakina's played well on clay in the past So, you know don't don't overlook her don't think that just because she's a big hitter doesn't mean she could play on clay She can she's very good on the clay so yeah interested to see how this one plays out again being a WTF 500 event You just never know what's gonna happen bottom half of the draw now the second or the third quarter of the draw We've got Fernandez the number seven seed getting a buy in the first round She'll take on an either Lynette or volley net so we're going at it in the first round Then we've got Rodgers versus Canepi winner of that match takes in either French or the number 11 seed Kaviteva in the second round Then we've got the number 13 seed Stevens taking on Zheng winner of that match takes on either a qualifier or Alexandrova In the second round, then we've got Zavatsko taking on Yuan winner of that match takes on the number three seed Carolina Pushkova we haven't seen much up because she's been injured for the most part I guess if you're looking at form You're probably gonna go with Fernandez or Kaviteva or Stevens hard to pick Pushkova right now because she is Still coming back from that hand injury But again, it's one of those events where I don't know You know the top seeds might not be the ones who wins and the bottom section of the draw We've got the defending champion the number eight seed Kudamatova She plays a qualifier in the second round because we've got two qualities going at it Then we've got Kondru versus the wild card Fruvatova who had a good week last week in Miami Winner of that match takes on either Wong on the number 10 seed Benchage in the second round Then we've got the number 16 seed Zhang taking on a qualifier winner of that match takes on either another Qualifier or Lu in the second round then we've got Hartono taking on Bondare winner of that match takes on the number two seed Palipa Dosa and I think but Dosa is gonna be the favorite for this tournament Even if you know she's the second seed She's definitely in better form than someone like a Sabalenka So she's probably the favorite to win the whole thing definitely got to watch out for her Kudamatova is the defending champ worth watching out for her, but also Benchage Benchage, you know having a good week last week. She can play on clay. I think she won Madrid a few years ago, which is a big clay court event So watch out for her as well anyone could win especially coming off Miami. It's it's a very quick transition from Miami to the clay I mean, but Dosa is the favorite I think to win it and she's probably the one everyone expects to win it But I don't know it's a tricky one for me. Maybe Sabalenka comes good. Maybe I don't know Maybe Jabor comes good and and win something. Maybe Pliscavo. This is her return. I I don't know It's gonna be tough, but I think for Dosa the favorite and she's the one to pick for the W and for the win But let me know in the chat. Let me know in the comments. What do you think? Who's gonna win this event in Charleston?