The other thing is I think couples would be better served in the early stages of dating is to do what I call radical honesty, laying your cards on the table, and the rules of engagement. Because couples are better served to talk about their values and what a relationship should look like for the two of them. Banging your cards on the table, that's merely unpacking your past relationship history for both yourself and giving the other person an opportunity to get a sense of what your your your it's like your job resume. And I also want to see how you ended each relationship to determine your level of emotional maturity. This is why we it's it's it's important to talk about the past relationship


At these points, I would like to introduce to you the first speaker, Orlando Taylor, who is distinguished senior advisor to the president, executive director, center for the advancement of STEM leadership, Field Graduate University. Prior to his current appointment, Dr. Taylor served as president for strategic initiatives and research at Fielding, where he was also the principal investigator and director for a national science foundation funded grant to advance women in STEM fields into leadership positions at the nation's historically black colleges and universities and tribal colleges. Before that, he served in several senior leadership positions at Howard University. I just happened to interact with, at that time, Dean Taylor at Howard University. I really enjoyed interacting with him. He was one of the architects of the American Association of Colleges and Universities, the National Science Foundation funded preparing critical faculty for the future project. Dr. Taylor has been a national leader for many years on issues pertaining to diversity and inclusion. It is a distinct privilege for me to welcome Dr. Taylor, and we look forward to your presentation today. Well, thank you, Dr. Phil, for that introduction and good afternoon, and I should say good morning and afternoon to the audiences today. This is a very important panel, very important workshop, and I'm honored to be the lead speaker. I want to focus on that topic of leadership as an essential requirement for broadening participation in STEM, because that is indeed what is a very important dimension of the whole question of diversity, equity, and inclusion and access in STEM. Rather than start with the model that many people start with, which is social justice, I don't start with that. While social justice is important in our nation and representation is important in our nation, I start with the competitive to competitive leadership, but the competitive advantage of the United States and claim that the United States will be unable to retain a STEM global leadership without more diversity and inclusion. And really, there are a lot of data one could cite to make that case. For example, the large number of STEM graduates in other countries, for example, in China and India, more global competition for STEM workers around the world. In fact, many individuals who formally sought to advance their own work in the United States are thinking in other countries, in other continents, Australia, and Asia, and in Europe, in Canada, so that we have much different competitive environment than we had, say, 50 years ago or 60 years ago when the United States pretty much dominated the STEM disciplines. At the same time, there is a decline in the relative numbers of white male college students. And that's the population that has sparkly fed into the STEM disciplines, white males. But that relative population is declining, only about 43% of all U.S. college students, for example, white males. And the rapid growth is in women, 57%, and purses of color, which now constitutes close to 40% of all students and colleges and universities. And some projected in the near future, the majority of students in American colleges and universities will be students of color to represent it in STEM. So that's really the context, in my view, why representation is so important. Also, at the outset of our workshop this afternoon, I think we need to be very mindful that different times and situations often require different approaches for change. And most of us have been focused on something some researchers call first order change, where we rearrange or we refine, or we add new dimensions to an existing structure or organization. Re-engineering, if you will, current structures. That's been a classic model that colleges and universities have followed for decades. We leave the organization the way it is, the curriculum the way it is, and we try to, we may tinker around the edges to make the organization of the institutions more acceptable and more effective with different types of students. But that's a first order change, and that's one approach. But that would argue that as a second order change, we need to take a much more interest in. That is changing or transforming the fundamental ways in which a structure or an organization does business. In other words, creating new models with new functions. Also, I think it's important for us to distinguish between leader leadership. Most people will hear the word leadership, and they'll think about whole titles. But leader is usually one with designated or articulate or titular authority and resources to make an implement organizational decisions and change, whereas leadership is anyone who acts or persuades others to act, to advance an organizational agenda with or without a formal leadership title. Many of us knowing universities that the department secretary, for example, may play a major leadership role in student support, for instance, and faculty support. They're not the dean, they're not the department chair, but they play an important part of leadership and student leaders, faculty leaders, alumni leaders and so forth. So I argue that we need second order change to advance rapid participation in STEM. That's because despite that case of efforts to achieve equity and inclusion in STEM, underrepresentation is confused. I argue that new approaches are required to achieve equity along the way also inclusion. Leadership is required. The focus is on fixing higher education. More than fixing Center for the Ambassador of STEM Leadership. It's a collaborative center research and development center funded by the National Science Foundation originally in 2016. It's a center that has three major components. There's a research component, the primary component, but there's an education component and an outreach knowledge transfer component. And it's a collaboration between and among four entities, the University of the Virgin Islands, North Carolina ANP State University, both historically black colleges, universities rather, the American Association of Colleges and Universities, that is a correct name. They changed their name to go. What was the Association of American Colleges and Universities, AAC and U, and it's still AAC and U, but it's American Association of Colleges and Universities. And my institutions are building graduate university in California. Now, we have this project with College Castle as our acronym and our goals are shown on the screen. I won't go through every one of them, but the key ones, one I would like to mention is too, we seek to examine, elucidate, and promote the intuitive and often unwritten codes of excellence and leadership that result in the broadening participation and success of AAC, U, and STEM. If you go to the literature or go to the books on leadership, you probably will not find these codes. And yet, these institutions do very well. The reason that I start this conversation with the HBCUs, I could use other, I could use HSIs, I could use tribal colleges, but today, because of time, I only focus on HBCUs. I want to just comment on why I start with HBCUs, and I could because I said MSIs. Remember that HBCUs, if you go to the literature, produce a disproportionate number of African American STEM undergraduates despite low budgets, body facilities, to blue chip students, et cetera, in some fields. While these institutions only comprise about 3% of the total number of higher education institutions in the country and enroll today about 9% of African Americans. In some fields, they produce more than 25% of all African Americans with baccalaureate degrees. For example, in a recent study that math, it was 33%, the physical science is 37%, and of the top producers of baccalaureate degree recipients, African American baccalaureate recipients who obtained doctoral degrees in STEM, seven of the top 10 are from HBCUs. So the question that one has to ask right off, how is that? How could they do that with the budgetary situation that they often face, the political climate they often find themselves in, and so on. And I'll comment on that momentarily. Council is grounded in Bowman and Gallus as four frames of academic leadership. And I would invite you to take a look at their book. There's a most recent version of it. I think you can see it on the screen. We'll make it the name available. It's called Reframing Academic Leadership. It was published by Josie Bassie in 2021. It's the second edition of a book. Originally came out with Bowman and Gallus, same thing, Reframing Academic Leadership. I believe it's the most important book on the topic at the moment. I urge you to read it. Because four frames of leadership that Bowman and Gallus or Gallus and Bowman speak to really serve as the foundations for our work in Castle. The first frame is called Structural, which focuses on a leader who focuses on goals and plans, tasks, strategic initiatives, metrics, and so forth. Political frame, which most people don't want to get involved with, don't want to get into the politics of higher education. But it focuses on political, I mean, coalition building, conflict resolution, and the like. Human resource frame focuses on human needs, relationships, team building, and the like. And the symbolic frame focuses on inspiring faculty and indeed the whole academic community, building a sense of belonging. Sometimes they may use slogans and so forth to do work. But those are the four frames that Bowman and Gallus speak to. Now, with respect to HBCUs, you'd have to argue if you say, well, they're so successful. Could it be leadership at various institutional levels, which I've implied a moment ago? And could it be the addition of a fifth frame that Bowman and Gallus don't talk about? We call it in Castle, the soul of leadership. We're not talking about soul food or soul music, we're talking about the collectivity of values, beliefs, legacies, perspectives, spirituality, personality, and cultural context that provide the basis for how one sees the world, how one interacts with people, objects, institutions, and the physical environment, and provides the framework for leadership. And so the one would argue that this dimension of leadership is a critical attribute of leadership in HBCUs. So then we go back to the question, why are HBCUs so successful and broadly participation in STEM? Castle claims, indeed it is leadership, many institutional levels. And that leadership is derived from the African-American cultural context or the African-American cultural experience. There are some common phrases I put on the screen that you often would hear in these institutions, standing on the shoulders of others. Students being told they've got to be twice as good and work twice as hard to be successful and so forth. A high value on road models and mentoring the young, very important dimension, and a strong adherence to traditional cultural values. Never forget where you came from. Take the next to your community and to your family and to God. In our work at Castle, we have learned several things that we have a special edition of the Journal of Negro Education, as Danny that's published in December 2021. I'm not sure it's available yet, but the date will show December 2021. It's on our work and the work of others who have focused on leadership, the broad participation in STEM. But there are some lessons we've learned as I'll leave you with these thoughts. Number one and most importantly, and this is a nod to one of my colleagues in the audience today, context matters, context and leadership matter together. Secondly, broad participation requires more focus on the concept of domain, more than a focus on the domain, using now the Bowman and Gabba's model. Broad participation requires a focus on institutions, systems and leaders, which is a bit of a difference from a focus on the students. Viewing the student as the problem, the student that needs to be fixed, not the institution, not the leadership. So the broad, the lesson that we have learned in CASEL that it requires a significant amount of attention and in many cases, re-engineering, both in thought and practice on systems and leaders. Then one thing we've learned for certain is that HBCUs and other MSIs should be seen as having successful, maybe even the best models for broad participation, and indeed can inform all, all of American higher education, not just minority serving institutions, so that if one really wants to, to learn how to do this, they should make a pathway to the places like Howard or Morehouse or Spelman. And I have the time to go into some of the numbers, but if you take a stool like Spelman College, which is a 2000 student institution, women, a women's college, and you know women are underrepresented in STEM, that's another talk for another day. Spelman ranks number two in the country in terms of producing African Americans of either gender of any, of any sexual designation and obtaining doctoral degrees upon their graduation from undergraduate school. It's only 2000 students. You can think of a lot, I know a lot of institutions, predominant white institution with far more students than Spelman, far more African American students, right in Atlanta, for example, Georgia State has 10,000 students, 10,000 African American students. That's more than Morehouse, Spelman, and Clark Atlanta put together. They ranked 39th in terms of producing African Americans who obtained doctoral degrees in STEM. Spelman is number two. Morehouse is number 11. Clark Atlanta is in the top 20. So there are lessons to be learned from all institutions. And so rather than seeing these institutions as a special focus that could only deal with their population, they have models that could be useful for all of us in higher education. And I'll stop here.


Canvas recently released their new rich content editor, which is for those of us that have been doing this for a while. What you see is what you get editor. In today's video, I'm just going to briefly show you the process of embedding an image using the new rich content editor. Let's go ahead and get to it. The new rich content editor will show up any place in Canvas where you can edit text. This can be editing pages, but most often folks experience this when replying and making discussion posts. Let's go ahead and look at a discussion post as a good example of how to do this. I'm in my course cafe with just a general discussion post right now, and I want to embed an image and a reply. I'm going to click the reply button here, and this is going to bring up the new rich content editor that you can see in this bar across the top. There's a bunch of different features, most of which you're probably familiar with, such as editing the text and changing the alignment. The tool that we want to look at today is this one right here. When you thumb over it, it says images, and this is the tool that you need to click on to embed an image into a post. Let's go ahead and try it out. I'm going to click on it, and just like the option to upload image. That's going to bring up the upload image tool. As you can see, there are a couple of different ways to do it. You can actually just plug a URL in here. You can search images on Unsplash, or if you have an image on your computer that you want to attach, you can do that from here. Now, it does have drag and drop functionality, which is pretty nice, because you can just bring up the image file on your desktop, drag it, drop it, and it's good to go. I'm going to go the old-fashioned way, and I'm going to click here, and attach an image that is located on my hard disk. You can see that I've got an image sitting on my desktop that I want to embed of a microphone. I'm going to go ahead and click on it, and then click Open. The image will show up here, and then I'm going to click Submit, and there it is. The other thing I want to show is that there are some options built in. This is important, especially when it comes to accessibility. If you click down here under Options, click on the image, select Options, which will pop up, and you can see over on the side that this image option comes up. One of the things that you want to do is add alt text for your images so that they're accessible. I'm just going to say a photo of a microphone. I've got that on there, and then it should be good to go. If you're doing images that aren't necessarily needing a description, such as decorative images, you can check this box, but for almost everything, you're going to want to have alt text put in there. You can also change the size of the image. If you want it to show up a little bit bigger, you can change it to large, or large, or add a custom size here, or shrink it down. All of these are nice, and honestly are a fair amount easier to use than the previous tool was. I am done here, so my image is good to go. I'm going to go ahead and click Post on my reply, and now I've submitted my reply with my embedded image. This might be a little bit different if you're making a page or setting up an assignment. The general process is the same, and it seems to be a pretty big improvement over the former content editor. All right, well, that is how to embed an image using Canvas' new Rich Content Editor. Thanks for watching.


Guys another product review here for cmp sportswear.com today We're talking about our women's cap sleeve jersey here a lot of cool things and subtle details that we've incorporated in this jersey It's a lightweight about an 80 to 20 politus band ex knit fabric Again the cap sleeve the tapered sleeve for the ladies Solid craftsmanship triple flatlock stitch on that on that cap sleeve there We went with the v-neck fit the overlapping collar right here as well We can go tagless with these if you guys don't want the tags and then just do the heat press on the inside But a hundred percent fully customizable cutting so Customizable with names whether it's a team name and number or it's where the individual athlete's name and number but uh We pretty much anything you can dream up We can put on these jerseys and again very lightweight very breathable for the field whether they're training in them Or where they're competing in them So I'd advise you to check us out cmp sportswear.com hit us up. We'll get you a quote get you guys squared away


What's good Josh is well Ross back at the game with another video and you see The robe is back on so you already know what that means man. I'm feeling Luxurious, I'm feeling good and I know some of you guys wanted me to bring back the robe. So Roe Ross has returned you're welcome and I am still the undisputed YouTube wrestling champ of the world We're gonna check out roll rumble winners. Nobody asked for now There's been a few times where we're sitting here watching the rule of rumble And there's a few people in the world rumble match that we're thinking maybe should win or could win And ultimately it's somebody that we didn't expect nor did we want to win You know Vince McMahon having his way with creative and and pretty much picking people He wants to see headline WrestleMania. We've seen that all too many times So we're gonna check this out wrestling's premiere I think this may be the first time I've ever checked out any videos from this individual So I'm gonna check this out see what he's talking about and we're gonna go from there appreciate all love and support Damn, I didn't press play automatically, but appreciate all love and support you guys have shown and let's see what wrestling's premiere Has to bring to the table on this very interesting topic Share of bizarre winners over the years some were welcoming others not so much the 1999 Royal rumble was headlined with a hundred thousand dollar bounty throughout the build Stone Cold Steve Austin was constantly being targeted He was forced to enter number one This was done in an effort to prevent Austin from headlining WrestleMania and in turn becoming the head of the company as Champion had to go through hell just to get the spot And I think everybody expected Austin to win it It just made sense because the corporation were thrown inside but in a surprise turn of events It was Mr. McMahon. Yeah booked himself to win the Royal rumble. Why to add more drama on Austin's pursuit of championship gold It was kind of smart because same Valentine's Day massacre did a good pay-per-view buy 450,000 buys and it's all from the heat that the Austin and command few generated especially from the Royal rumble itself And gave Austin another dramatic obstacle to overcome ahead of WrestleMania So it's very very different to the rest of the list throughout the 2000s WWE got the Royal rumble winners Right, I wouldn't even say for the most part because when I see who won they all made sense Obviously in hindsight the Chris Ben while one sticks out I'm sure Eddie girl would have been cool in that spot But the 2000s Edge wins in 2010 and then 2011 comes around and at this point there was a few favorites The result wasn't entirely surprising I'd say but the favorites were John Cena and of course Alberto Del Rio Del Rio's win came only four months after his debut and showed that there was a bright future It was from out of nowhere though Not the build but the fact that around summer same time this guy hadn't debuted and he was gonna be the one to face Edge at WrestleMania for the World Heavyweight Championship The problem comes down to how hard he was pushed and that all started here Another problem though was who else could win this rumble the only candidates were John Cena and Maybe see young punk and Randy Orton So that wasn't much it looks like the new era was the way to go I guess throughout the year the new wave of talent was becoming more and more notable others were given another chance at Superstar One of those to receive this chance was Seamus as a baby face Seamus was revitalized and became one of the strongest booked wrestlers on the entire roster His character was I remember when Seamus first came into the mix into WWE here. They were booking him strong They were booking him strong. I remember that. I was like they they really into the Seamus guy Fresh from what he used to be and had some height behind him at the time He didn't seem as a likely winner He did look like a potential secondary winner though, but the first was Chris Jericho Jericho's return had some oddness about it, but he was the favorite and just for this They decided to change it like that It didn't stop them in the past and for somebody like Chris Jericho to add the royal rumble to his legacy would have been cool That would have been nice Second fiddle but not to mention their match as well It's a very forgettable rumble and a very forgettable winner as well The next one though was the opposite John Cena after a widely inconsistent 2012 Which was highly a overexaggerated as the worst year of John Cena's career. He looked to rebound in 2013 to explain this properly His year is like the chiefs the warriors or even a team like man sitting out doing well, but it certainly wasn't his worst It was his worst since probably 2008 though the moment 2013 began everyone and their mom knew who was winning the royal rumble And it wasn't Dolph Ziggler or Ryback. It was John Cena This one might seem as false advertising if you read the title because there was some definitely that wanted him to win But it was not the interesting and predictable Predictable isn't always bad But when it's John Cena and the height of his push winning the royal rumble in the year of 2013, that's a different story I think they could have had him face the rock with another scenario and have somebody challenge for the world title here The redemption storyline was gonna happen anyways And a better world though triple threat drama the rock winning the royal rumble or even the arctic winning the rumble itself It sounds so far-fetched and ridiculous, but I would have preferred it over John Cena winning just something other than him here It wasn't even bad It just happened the early tens had some I didn't downright bad decisions towards the rumble And this pales in comparison to a couple of others towards WrestleMania 30 season The only topic in the fence is might was that of Daniel Ryan? Yeah, no, it was it was Daniel or bust That was it. Anything else was like I well No It was Daniel Bryan or bust There were some people that could have got by with it at the time Uh, I think, um, Roman Reigns. It's crazy saying that Roman Reigns at the time Could have been a better likely choice and the people would have bought into it, but nah People wanted Daniel Bryan to win it. This was Prime yes movement right here Ryan's influence had taken the world by storm And the heights he reached have never been toppled since So on the fans' eyes, there was only one man to win it off the build for the rumble made sense Bryan got his ass beat repeatedly by the Wyatt family and the authority Surely he'd turn it around now, right? Nobody else seemed like the favorite. That is until Batista returned cool to see him back It's been a while the fans shared that sentiment for all of two minutes because They turned on When they all expected to see Daniel Bryan The winning was horrific Yeah, just maybe if he came out number 30 as a surprise there would have been less outrage But the floodgates were open and letting off Ask 10 people. Did you like Batista winning one will answer yet? It also ruined his return because from there he was always going to be a heel in the fans' eyes Yeah, and that sucks because Batista's return was pretty much overshadowed with the fact that no one Wanted to see him win and only wanted to see Daniel Bryan. That was it He became boo Tista from then on And that thought's unfortunate because he's Batista. I grew up watching him tear down the opposition Yeah with loads of charisma So seeing them become hated and yet some people actually hated him personally for taking that spot It was kind of said him being brought in like this was going to cause problems And that's exactly what happened Even he believed that this wasn't the right way to go Not many were asking for a Batista rumble win in the year 2014 Hell they even want Roman Reigns in the shroom to win it And I guess McMahon was like, okay Heading into late 2014 the shield as a trio was no more Each man drifted into a direction and they seemed primed for super successful careers Roman Reigns though was to WWE that clear stand His size and look was helping him a lot and he didn't have much experience Especially at the main event level, but they were going to make it work Upon his return in December Roman Reigns was slowly turned up It also didn't help that Daniel Bryan had just returned as well And the thing is with peak Daniel Bryan the fans will make noise and don't care who's in the way Here it was Roman Reigns come rumble time It was set up to force everybody to cheer for Roman Bryan was eliminated early on and that was the beginning Ambrose and Ziggler were the ones Once Bryan was eliminated in that rumble very early Oh Oh It uh It was it was it was going to be a uh a very interesting uh rest of the rumble Were set up to be the big obstacle But they turned on the match and even when the rock came out It's like hey cool to see you rock. Fuck you Roman Nothing was going to help him and Rusev was cheered to win it But he did it and the conclusion saw the fans tweak Can't tell WWE Network On the other net it was a mess And the Roman push coupled with a few other things led to WWE suffering then record low ratings It hurt the product a lot and fell forced because Roman Reigns was talent He was just green and needed direction not misguided It should have been slow and natural Sometime like beating Rusev for the US title WrestleMania and winning the world title There we go. So that sounds much better. We're gonna turn on him anyway Such as how it is But we would have had a lot more goodwill from the rest of the audience And a minor thing to mention is that see on punk interview You guys remember that see on punk interview with Cole Cabana That was when see on punks like oh, they gotta make Roman look strong And a lot of people a lot of people from there were like hey, this guy's overpushed This 2015 run was very bumpy But he ended the year being cheered after some clever booking as well It was very smart of them to book it the way they did But this is not the video for that's for another time Roman Reigns's issues with the authority intensified after he took out Triple H at this point We all knew what was up, especially because Roman won the title and was forced to defend it The thing is Triple H returning, you know like and winning the whole thing. I feel it was average Like I want to say it's Trish. It's not it's not it's not bad, but it just came off as unnecessary I think there was an injury crisis at the time and the likes of John Cena set the rounds weren't there But there could have been a better winner, right? Because that Triple H and Roman Reigns match was so boring Oh, man, I honestly think and I'm gonna stand by this I think I had a discussion with someone in the comment section when we was talking about this Where I was like, no Dean Ambrose shouldn't have been the guy to win that Win that Royal Rumble. I think he should have be only because The main event Would have been a little bit more interesting Y'all can't tell me the main event in WrestleMania Dean Ambrose versus Roman Reigns Would have been a little bit more interesting because now You kind of you kind of would have been able to play with something here Like you could have that could have been the moment you turn Roman That could have been the moment because everyone would have cheered Dean Ambrose Roman Reigns would have tried his hardest to like really, you know Like really try to stay true and honest, but He would have hurt the negativity from everybody else, you know Maybe Dean Ambrose could have been like, you know, the people don't love you, bro You know how this ends, you know what I'm saying and he finally turns I think that would have been a greater story to tell than Roman versus Triple H because we knew how this was gonna end Yeah, all I remember from that match is Roman accidentally spearing Stephen or something like I don't remember much from it Dean Ambrose a shield main event with the two facing off could have been special To set it between those two in the action the match itself would have been better Yeah, what it wasn't to be and it was another disappointing Roman Reigns match The hype for the Royal Rumble in San Antonio was real It was by far the most star studded Royal Rumble in almost 10 years and gave off an unpredictable feeling It could have been the undertaker rock lezner gulbert chris jericho That hype and excitement for a Royal Rumble had in me felt in years when the match happened It just happened the favorites disappeared like that and we were left with Roman Reigns and Randy Orton Roman was a surprise intro and let me tell you the dread and lack of excitement They're like who is it five four three two one is it Finn is it omega is it Nakamura?  And just thinking about it now It was funny and it still is like when you look at that time period everybody hated this man Obviously some people cheered him and won not but the majority buddha They did not like him and at this point whoever was the opponent in the ring It didn't matter if it was John Cena Rusev hell even Jack Gallagher They would cheer him and that's what happened as Randy Orton managed to win the entire thing with the fence cheering It was a bit odd to see him win But the betting was in his favor a few days earlier personally I didn't understand why Orton needed to win the Royal Rumble The story was him infiltrating the Wyatt family and turning the whole thing into ruins It doesn't really need a Royal Rumble and that kind of fell flat too That fell flat That fell flat Granted I give what he's saying it didn't need the Royal Rumble You could have just had him do that on his own, you know, I'm saying didn't need the Royal Rumble win But yeah, that that definitely that match that few just fell flat I was expecting a little bit more, but it didn't go nowhere. So I mean, I didn't have a problem with him winning It was it was a anybody but roman situation at the time. So all right, let's give it to randy Victory then again another story was in front of them and that's of course the chris jericho storyline So if they weren't going to do that, what were they going to do? That leaves one more story the undertaker and with 2007 aj styles one of the most perfect Immaculate eras arrestors ever had I know for a fact that they would have burned down the building built it up and did it again That was the wwe title would have been incredible Randy Orton was an odd choice and it didn't help that the WrestleMania match was disgusting and forgettable I remember watching WrestleMania 33 the next day in the morning and I didn't know the results, you know So start the show at 11 a.m. I didn't watch it. I knew this match wasn't gonna be good I literally skipped over and later learned that I didn't really miss much. It was bad. It sucked Which was not a surprise to me. So all in all rumble Randy Orton is the rumble winner Was pretty underwhelming due to what came out of it. But 2018 and 19 rumbles were not really offensive They were inoffensive. It seemed like the right calls at the time It's just the aftermath that was an issue for a bunch of them with the WrestleMania 36 on the horizon Though it met yet another challenger was to be determined in the rumble for the woman And didn't seem like there was many favorites I remember at the time thinking it would be Shayna Baszler because she had unfinished business with Bailey and Becky Lynch But it turned out to be charlotte and wife because At the end of the day, it's always her. It's always the wheels keep on going She leaves she comes back beyond all she's gonna win the title again. That's how it always is That's that's crazy.  There was only one Woman that could have won the entire thing. That's Sasha Banks But she got injured She got injured at the time it led to charlotte's stat panning once again This all leads me to 2022 2022 the most disappointing set of royal rumble winners in recent Rhonda Rousey and Brock Lesnar the rumbles like the You know both matches. They did not have a true favorite. We were going into it. It's like, oh He could win it. She could win and we didn't really know who had the best chance The woman's rumble had me believing Sasha Banks would win because of her return and the men's for me was aj styles Even though he didn't really look like he had a much of a chance to begin with when you look at the build The pay-per-view didn't have much height behind and with the lack of favorites It turned out to be very uninteresting Rhonda winning the rumble is dull I did not care for and it led to what nobody in the right mind would ask for and what it was going to lead to And ever since she came back her form was nothing closer to 2018 run Four years is a long time in wrestling and it seemed like time has passed her by Then at the main event Brock Lesnar who all he has to do is say the two words title shot Enter that number 30. Yeah, it was one of the worst things WWE did in 2022 That's not really saying much because if you ask me it's probably going to be the first thing on my mind It wasn't that good and it was a waste of a royal rumble, you know It also didn't help the matches themselves are very forgettable Like if it was a good rumble people like um, at least it was a good match But it wasn't then he had Brock Lesnar randomly coming in and destroying half the roster before winning the whole thing So it was dumb. All right, so that's the royal rumble winners. This is nobody asked for very good I just thought about going back a little Possibly to Hogan's second rumble victory It's just didn't make sense for me to go back all the way because I thought it was unnecessary So that's why I started with 99 because if you go back a lot of the winners were like this and that And definitely definitely for someone like Lux Luger There had to be a lot of people that actually wanted him to win it in 94, right? There just had to be so that's why I started with 1999 I went away for a couple of days because I was trying to think of the next video I was going back and forth. That's what caused me to release this so late So I apologize for that. I got a couple of videos on my mind. These are some of the videos I have on okay, I wish I could do them this month, but I can't guarantee all of them I don't for effect the first two Actually, the first three are this month for definitely definitely that one obviously is going to be very very long I'm very excited to make it I may have to check out without durag vids. Oh, brother Oh, no, this is a dope man. I'm gonna go ahead and give this a like Uh, and I'm gonna go ahead and subscribe y'all go subscribe to wrestling's premiere Give him a subscription Shout out to to the dude, man. This was a pretty good video.   It's over I was just like, yo, this is This is what we're doing This is this is how we go start off wrestling manias. He's okay. All right, cool So, yeah, I I'm in the greens with a lot of these man, but comment down below. Let me know Which some of the uh, which are some of the winners that you felt like They shouldn't have won like, uh, I don't I don't know how I feel about this They they made the wrong decision here. Let me know down below, man I appreciate y'all kicking it. We I can't even talk man. I can't even talk How much is in the video there? I'm in the video. Roll bros is out. I'm done. I'm done


What's going on everyone? Sam here with Leighton Sports Guards. We are doing 21-22. Revolution, basketball, hobby, eight box, case break, number 48, random team style. Here is a look at your results again. As always, there is a link in chat if you want to check that out, as well as a go on the website under the results tab. Let's do it. These are always fun. The auto checklist in this is always great in my opinion. See if we can hit our galactic out of this too. That'd be awesome. Got a couple of optic PYTs up and then we've got a great 10 box Tuesday. Rich killed it with the 10 box Tuesdays this week. They are awesome. The football one, the baseball one was a lot of fun. Basketball is sold out already. We've got Noir first off the line, Immaculate and Impeccable. And then we've got in football, we've got two boxes of select hobby from this year, 21. We've got a box of 21 NT and a box of 2020 select. Astral, Joellen B and Vortex really go bare. Stifle Tower. See if we can hit a big galactic rookie. That'd be so sick. Groove, Derrick Rose, Moses Moody rookie, Warriors. Yeah, it is going to be fun when update comes out. Update is always awesome. Fractal rookie is Jalen Johnson and Shockwave of Devin Booker, son. Shockwave is Galactic. There you go, Sixers. James Hardin on the Shockwave. Gabriel S. Congrats, buddy. Galactic Hardin. Let's go, baby. That's awesome. As a Sixer too, Austin Reeves. So Galactic. Revolution comes out after the trade deadline a lot of times. So that's why you see Hardin's a Sixer. Demontus Sabonis, Astral rookie, Revolution Duarte is because that's why like Sabonis is on the Kings, Halliburton Pacers, McCollum Pelicans, Simmons on the Nets, all those kinds of things. Vortex is Fractal of Demontus Sabonis, again, speaking of. Shreve Cooper rookie. Nice Galactic, man. That's awesome, dude. Mo Bamba, just base. Fractal Lute Duarte, I believe, yes. And John Linkominga, Vortex rookie. Astral Quintengrimes rookie. And Jeremiah Robinson, I'll do a box one onto box number two. So we're looking for generally about four autos per case here, usually it'll fall about one over two boxes. So that's why you're not guaranteed an auto, but they are pretty solid. You see them a lot. And it's a good checklist, dude. It's a really cool checklist. Every year it is. Groove, Derek White, Ayo Dasumu rookie, and Keon Johnson. There's six cards in that. We might be shorted one card in one of these packs here. Got Zyre Williams, gonna be our first auto. Going to the Gris rookie auto. There you go. Memphis, Keon QI. Got Shay Gilgis Alexander, 68 out of 149 on the impact.  Hey, this is a Josh Giddy Groove rookie and Stanty Alderman. Your next fan? Yeah, I know. I am sorry as well. It's kind of tough. There's Luca Astral, nice one there, Mabs, and Shockwave Franz Wagner. You're all in on the magic this year? Yeah, you might as well. Liftoff Lebron, that's pretty cool. Fractal, there you go, Lakers, and Sandro Mamakujavilli. That one's a, that one ain't easy. That ain't an easy name. Especially when he's in NT, he's these RPAs, you actually have to say the name. Again, just be like, here's a Sandro. Fractal Capella, Vortex, Kate Cunningham, there you go, Detroit, nice one there. You gotta actually like, full on say the name. It's always tough. Astral Zyre Williams rookie, Cam Thomas, Nets, Astral Nicola Jokic, and Josh Giddy rookie revolution for the Thunder. Max Box, here we go. Hey guys, got a fill up Elements. That is the next one we got to fill up. Halfcase number 14. Yanis Vortex, that's Fractal, and Kai Jones, Draymond Green. Jeremy Grant, you got a refresh on the main breaks, everyone should come up. Liftoff, John Collins. I can just drop the link to them. Yeah, no, it got added later. I had the same thing, it wouldn't show up for me. There's a Georgia's Calatisikis on the Astral rookie, and a Cade-based rookie. Bucks, then Pistons there. Gordon Hayward, Astral, Shockwave Dame, 11 to go on that one, breaking relatively soon. Groove John Wall, Corey Kispert rookie. Joshua Primo, that is Cosmic, 49 out of 99, rookie for the Spurs, and Vortex rookie, Scotty Barnes. Isaiah Todd, on the Impact, 88 out of 149, rookie Wizards, then a Jalen Green rookie. Rockets. Astral, John Morant, there you go, Grizzlies, and rookie revolution, Jeremy Robinson Earl, on to box four. These are sharp, you get caught on one of these, they are like weapons of these boxes. Gotta be so careful. Lamello, Drew Holidaygroove, Dearon Sharp. Oh, CJ McCollum, 24 out of 25 pelicans. There you go, New Orleans, Elvis R. Heck yeah, knew that was coming. Chris Middleton on the Sunburst, 52 out of 60, and Vortex is Rudy Gobert. I would have bet my life if you were going to say that when I hit one, that was it. Jericho Sims, Groove, Rookie, Nix, Kessler Edwards, Jared Butler, Brutal dude, Brew, Tau, Astral, Alonzo Ball, Devin Booker, Shockwave, Sons, Io Dasumu, Rookie Revolution, Fractal, and Chris Duarte, base rookie, Bulls and Pacers there. Jared Butler, Fractal Rookie, and Chris Duarte, Rookie Revolution, Pacers. Kai Jones, Astral Rookie, Dallin O'Banton, Islanders for the NHL, I don't have really anything against the Islanders. Jalen Brunson, and John L. Kominga, Vortex, Rookie, Groove, Rudy, Warriors, on to box five. Look here again everyone. Did not, no, same kind of situation with football. Plus we didn't really have any big hockey fans in my family. Chris Paul and Tray Man on the rookie. So it was kind of like, yeah, unless I really wanted to, they were like, you don't really have to bother with this. Piles Turner, 94 out of 100, going to the Pacers. There you go, Indiana. Who's got Indiana? That's pretty solid actually. Elvis R again. Got Santy Aldema, Cosmic, 30 out of 50, Rookie for the Gris, and Kate Cunningham, Shockwave. Jaden Springer, there's a Kominga base rookie, JT Thor, Mo Bamba, Vortex, Cat, Tendulz. Vortex is Zach Levine, got Jalen Johnson, Luca Garza, Gary Trent, that is Jalen Suggs, Rookie Revolution, Josh Christopher, Astral Rookie, Alfred Shengun, both of the Rockets there, and last pack, Astral Ben Simmons, and liftoff Zach Levine on the groove for the Bulls. There you go, Chicago, Vortex, Carly Anthony Towns, Sandro Rookie, Dennis Schroederfractal, James Bookknight, Rookie Revolution, Kate Cunningham on the Astral Rookie, there you go, Detroit, Simian C, and Cantons, always good to pull a Kade parallel. Ain't nothing wrong with that. Groove J, there you go, Grizzlies, and Keon Johnson, is Astral Norman Powell, and liftoff Lebron on the groove, there you go, Lakers, nice one there, Lakers. Got Shaquille O'Neal, nice shack for the Lakers. He's got LA, that's so awesome. A and B on the one spot, picking up the Shaktis Auto, Diesel, congrats man, Ben Simmons, impact. Oh yeah, that's the 149 on the Ben Simmons, Bones Highland, Groove, Rookie Nuggets, Santy Aldema, Gannis Astral, there you go, Bucks, and Franz Rookie Vortex on the groove. Bones there, maybe we get an extra, who knows, who knows, who knows. Got one of those other super short prints. Who is this? Reggie Jackson on the anniversary, 45 out of 75, and Jaylen Green Rookie, that's aren't terrible, that's probably the best team of all of them. Thank you, Sean, dropping the link again here, Astral, Michael Porter Jr., Supernova, Lebron, eight to go on that element. Let's get her filled guys, Rookie of Revolution, Jonathan Kominga, that is Fractal, Kai Jones Rookie, Zach Levine Fractal, Shockwave KD, Austin Reeves Rookie Astral, got a Kade-based Rookie, Pistons, Reeves going to the Lakers, Lakers doing very well after that shack. Wes Brick on the Astral Vortex, Jason Tatum, Curry Kawhi Leonard on the groove, and Corey Kispert. Got Harrison Barnes on the anniversary, 49 out of 75, Kings, and Supernova Lebron. Just picking up some more Lebron, Zach Levine Fractal on the lift-off, Bulls, Joe Wisekamp Rookie, Cam Thomas Fractal Rookie, first Mobley, that's a Vortex Rookie for the Caps. Davion Mitchell, Astral Rookie, Scotty Barnes-based Rookie, Kings and Raptors there. Astral Deandre, 8 in Rookie Revolution, Moses Moody going to the Warriors. Darius Garland groove, Brandon Boston Jr. Rookie, got Julius Randall, that is Cosmic, 62 out of 99 mix, and lift-off Jalen Green on the groove, nice one there for the Rockets. Isaiah Jackson on the groove, followed by Quentin Grimes, and last pack of the break. Good luck here, guys. Got Astral Chris Middleton and Vortex Nikolaj Jokic, that'll do it for the break. Let's do a quick recap. We had Shaq going to the Lakers auto. Miles Turner, that is 94 out of 100 for the Pacers. CJ McCollum, 25 pelicans. Zair Williams going to the Grizzlies. And how about a galactic? Shockwave James Harden. Yeah, and there is the galactic. Case, case hit right there. That'll do it for the break, everyone. Thanks again. Coming up, we've got Optic PYTs.


This 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium is stock number 11972Z. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. You're new and used sports car headquarters. This 2010 Ford Mustang has the 4.6-liter V6 motor, pumps out 315 horsepower. This was the last year that you could get the 4.6 in the Mustang. This car has been fully-safetyed and inspected by our service shop as a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off, and this car is 100% ready to go. One of my favorite colors on the Mustangs is Kona Blue, metallic. We shoot all of our videos in 1080p, 60 frames per second, so if you have HD capabilities on your computer, tablet, smartphone, or television, turn them on right now because it is definitely your best way to check out the quality and condition of the car before seeing it in person. If you like the video and want to subscribe to our YouTube channel, the lower right-hand part of the screen is a subscribe button. Click that, and then click the bell notifications to get updates each and every day. We do videos of our great inventory here at Summit Auto. This one comes with the 19-inch painted alloy rims and polished aluminum course. It has the Goodyear Eagle RSA Tyres. These are P245, 45R18s, and they have a really good amount of tread left. I'd say probably 60 to 70% of the tread left on there. Front fender is in excellent condition. I didn't see any dents or dings on there. Headlight lenses are nice and clear, and it does come with the factory fog lights. Front bumper is in nice shape. I didn't see any major scuffs or scrapes or cracks, and it's never been drilled into. The hood is in pretty nice shape. It does have a couple little dings on it. I did notice. One right there and one right there. But other than that, pretty nice. Passengers side front fender is in excellent shape. No scuffs or scrapes or dents or dings. Passengers side rim, no scuffs or scrapes on there. As you go down this side of the car, take note of how clean the body is, how reflective and mirror-like that paint is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away or even if you're close by, you just cannot make the trip down, but you're still interested in purchasing the car. You can see the car here, the car, and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here. So when you do get here, there's absolutely no surprises, no discomfort of your own home. Very nice and clean down that side. This back rim is in excellent shape as well.  Which would make sense because it's a rear-wheel-drive car. As we come around the back, rear bumper is in great shape. The trunk lid is in excellent condition as well. I kind of wanted to show you that Kona Blue. See if we can get a little bit of the metal flake to show up there. It's got just a little bit of pearl in it. It's really a cool color. There you go, you can see it just a little bit there. Anyways, coming around to the driver's side just as clean as that passenger's side. No dents or dings on the rear quarter. This back rim is in nice shape too. It does have the capitalist feel-fill which is a really nice feature. Never get gas on your hands again. And down the driver's side, door looks really good. Do you get power mirrors? We'll take a quick look at the trunk before we check out the interior here. Trunk area is very nice and clean. And I believe this one comes with a spare tire. Yes it does.  You get the grabber blue stripes and the grabber blue stitching. Side curtain airbags, no rips, no tears, no major wear on that seat, power driver seat, factory floor mats, auto headlamps, windows, power locks and power mirrors. You get that leather bolstering on the doors as well as the blue stitching and the Mustang logo there. The back seats are in excellent condition as well. No rips or tears back there and it does have the latch child safety system. Side curtain airbags. We'll hop inside. Turn the ignition on so you can see the miles. This one does have 45,853 miles.  Very nice and clean. Cruise controls on the left. The steering wheel is in nice shape. No major scuffs or scrapes on there. Bluetooth and audio controls on the right. And notice you do get the blue stitching on the inside of the steering wheel there as well. You also get the Mustang logo in the center there. This one comes with the Shaker sound system. Six disc CD changer. AM, FM and serious satellite radio capabilities. On here. You do get heated seats. Sink for your Bluetooth cell phone. Stability control. That's your trunk popper. Hazard lights and your automatic transmission. Passengers side, floor mat and seat are in excellent condition. No rips or tears on there. Looks really good. And the headliner on this car is absolutely perfect. It feels very clean inside this car. I'd be highly surprised if it was ever smoked in. And you do get map lights up there. This one also has the ambient lighting where it changes the color of the cup holders. As well as down by the floorboards when the lights are on. And you can change that color to match whatever color you want. You do that through the cluster there. We'll start it up and then we'll take a quick look under the hood. Starts right up. No check engine lights or anything like that. I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today. And hopefully from this HD video you'll be able to tell just how clean this car is all the way around. Inside and out. Under the hood we have the 4.6 liter V8 motor. Engine bay is very clean. Runs very smooth. Once again this car has been fully inspected by our service shop. Has a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off. See the washer fluid is topped off there. And this car is 100% ready to go. And I'd highly recommend this car from a quality and condition standpoint. Really good looking too. And to see more pictures of this car one of the other 450 new and used cars, trucks, SUVs, minivans, Wranglers, Mustangs, Challengers, Chargers, GT500s, Corvettes, Camaros, we've got to go to that website right there. www.summitauto.com Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at summitauto.com. If you'd like to check out more HD videos you can go to youtube.com. Remember to like, subscribe and share on this video and all the videos that you see there. Also click the bell notifications to get updates every day we do. Videos of our new and used inventory at Summit Auto. In fact in a second we'll see a link to subscribe to our YouTube channel in the upper left. A link to more Mustang videos like this one in the upper right. A link to this vehicle on our website in the lower left and a link to one of our latest YouTube videos in the lower right. Click those check us out and we're super excited to help you with this Ultra Clean 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium and Kona Blue Metallic. Thank you so much for checking out the video and remember to like, subscribe and share.