Data is definitely setting up. You see like Intel, for example, right? Got rejected three times in the same area. Welcome to Access a Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success, profitability and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge, master your process and own your future. Hey guys, good evening everybody. Welcome to another edition of the Access a Trader dot com nightly wrap up show. Hope everybody is doing well. Can we talk about the latency? Right, could all of us acknowledge what the hell is going on here? Is it me or every broker on the planet at the open is having a delay or pause or some sort of latency to disseminating prices at the word go? Now look, I traded some incredibly volatile markets before 9-11, right? The mortgage mess. Are you telling me one share and four share accounts are so rabid at the open that there's latency everywhere?  Anyway guys, good morning, good afternoon, good evening everybody depending where you're watching this broadcast. Hope everybody had a good day today. Weird day. I think that's the best way of saying it. Really, really weird day. So I had a very specific plan coming in today. If you watch the broadcast over the weekend, we had the first close on the IWM broke, literally broke rising support first time since September of 2020. You had selling nonstop for the last several weeks in high beta name, including the names that came out with their earnings, they were all sold, right? Everybody's telling me over the weekend, Dan, you gotta watch silver, you gotta watch silver. There's no day that should ever start out that silver is your top watch. I would rather not trade than silver being my top watch. All right, so that's out of the hand. So you had this really, really weird formula being set up for the day and the market gapped up, right? And that was fine. And again, I tweeted out, and we talked about this at the webinar this morning. I wanted to give, I don't wanna call it the bears, but I wanted to give the sell side the benefit of the doubt this morning, at least for the first two candles. For those of you guys who don't know what two candles I'm talking about, I trade 60 minute candles and only six of them throughout the day. So I wanted to give the sell bias just from my plan to kind of play out to see if it'd actually come into fruition. And this was the weirdest freaking day, I think in a long time, not monetary wise. There was nothing wrong. There was some pivots really went. Amazon really good aggressive. We'll talk about the individual pivots in a second. But what I thought that was really odd about this day, everything that should have happened went completely the opposite direction. Stocks that should have stopped that supply, for example, a cash roll move went right through it. We saw some incredible aggressive call buying going on. I'll talk about that in a second. But it just felt odd. You know, there's certain days that felt odd, but the craziest thing of all, the absolute craziest thing of all, we are in, I'm in New Jersey, right? We're literally have two feet of snow. I bought a generator in September. The reason why I bought a generator, I finally it's through in the town, I bought a generator. For the last year or so, we've had these really weird small storms.  So I finally said, you know what, I'm just getting a generator. So I finally got a generator. We got two feet of snow. I still have power. Weird day, incredibly weird day. So here's kind of what's happening here. If you guys watch the video over the weekend, the one thing I kept on reiterating to the point of, this you're gonna make some money.  There's always days that you're better. There's certain days that you're worse. But the one thing that we kind of talked about over and over again on the weekend update was this kind of gang mentality. You remember, it's us versus them. We're gonna put this out of business. So let's unify, do this, do that, the other thing. And I've always maintained the point. And I think this was a very fair point over the weekend that you could buy whatever you want, right? You could buy whatever you want. No broker or anybody else should tell you how to allocate your money. But there's a big difference between us versus them or stabbing yourself in the throat repeatedly. And unfortunately, you know, when I spoke to my son over the weekend, dad, you gotta buy AMC, right? Why didn't they, why would you even say that? Tick tock, okay. Top watch GME, you know, GME just went from like 30 to 500. Top watch GME. And the moral of the story is, you know, we continue to be, and when I say we, human beings continue to be their own worst enemies. And it's fine to have conviction.  And unfortunately, again, retail got their piece of the pie, right? Last week, they did what they had to do. And unfortunately, the hold the liners and all that stuff, they're gonna absolutely murder today. After the close, you see GameStop trading in the 180 AMC. Again, you know, top watch, right? Tick tock says top watch. The stock is traded down to 11, so again, guys, there's a time and a place to take a stand for everything. But like I said, every single day, if you're ever going to take that shot, make sure it's technically not because you're fighting against the machine or you're trying to prove a point.  So guys, just be very careful.  And unfortunately, again, you see what's going on after hours right now, unfortunately a lot of good people, hardworking people, just got caught up in the excitement and they're seeing some really aggressive prices being taken down. So again, is it a learning lesson? You know, some lessons just don't need to be learned because all you need to do is kind of listen to folks kind of been there before. So hopefully all jokes aside, hopefully everybody is staying well. What I thought, what I like, what I saw today, okay, was the idea that Beta actually made a stand. Okay, your Amazons of the world, your Netflix's of the world, NVIDIA woke up, Roku woke up, Tesla woke up. And ironically, I was looking at Tesla. This was one of my, this was literally one of my top plays. This was literally going to be my top play of the day before the upgrade this morning. And I was watching this 780 level over the weekend and hell, this thing would have confirmed 780. It was a really big move. But again, this is why we talk about you have a plan, you have to wait for it to confirm. You don't guess, you don't anticipate, you wait for things to confirm. And now all of a sudden, Tesla reclaimed this whole macro range and now it's literally like a day away from getting at the top of the ranges. And you saw some notable call activity today. The 900 weeklies came out, the 875 weeklies came out. So there's betters, right? There's betters back in the name. Amazon, right? They report tomorrow. And the big question was can Amazon finally, maybe kind of wake everything up. The big buzz is everybody wants them to split their stock, obviously. At first I was like, well, why split their stock? There's a reason why institutions like buying this thing there's lack of retail. But at some point, you have a stock that's going to be completely untradable. At times when you look at the level two on Amazon, you might love the setup and you're looking at a $3 to $4 spread with a hundred shares in each lot. So you can literally take the offer and be down four or five points right away. And if you get a bad move in the futures market at the same time you're buying the stock, you'd be down $15, $20 in absolute seconds. So cross our fingers, cross our toes. Hopefully after tomorrow's earnings they will split their stock. I think I could speak for everybody. I think this is the one who really deserves it. And again, I don't know about 10 to one, 20 to one, at least three to one.  I don't need 10 to one, five to one. Give us at least a three for one split. Give us something that could at least attract some more liquidity. Just kind of narrow the spreads. Everybody wants to be in this thing. It's a monster. So tomorrow we will see if there are more aggressive buyers coming in ahead of earnings, stepping in ahead of earnings. You can see here this is very, very close at least from the macro wise before they report tomorrow evening that if they could just reclaim the December 29 highs, maybe has one more push ahead of earnings. I think the weirdest bet that I saw today, not just one bet, but several bets was FUBU, right? So if you guys remember FUBU had this really big run last week, I even believe, and I could be wrong, but I even believe that Citron got bullish at this thing at some point, whatever it was. But we saw some really weird bets today. There were buyers coming in, not just like 10, 15 grand. There was a buyer that came in for the February 19 calls, excuse me, February 90 calls, okay? The stock is at $52. He came in for the February 19 expiration 2019 90 calls for 750 grand. He came later for another $300, $400,000 for the same expiration, but the 85s. So basically somebody's coming out and saying I'm willing to put, to drop $1.1 million in premium for the stock, oh, by the way, almost doubles in the next two weeks. Just saying, these people, they are very uncertain, right? They're not uncertain. So for example, a guy came in this morning and he bought the 230, I think he bought the 235 weekly puts and he dropped $6 million on the premium, right? $6 million on the premium drop this morning. You saw the stock going all the way down, like really, excuse me, went all the way down initially to that 220 level. So the options market really is aggressive on certain aims. And when something stands out so aggressively, like a $6 million bet on the weekly puts on GME or this FUBU play, that is getting very, very interesting. And you can see here on the daily chart, right? It's just very, very close. They're really jumping and getting aggressive. So we have to watch this thing, especially on dips. If this thing dips in the next couple of days and we continue to see these buyers coming in for the 85, 90 calls, man. You know, a brother got to play, right? A brother definitely got to play. So we got to keep an eye on that. Other than that, beta is definitely setting up. You see like Intel, for example, right? Got rejected three times in the same area. Very interesting chart. You got Roku waking up, right? Testing the 10 day moving average. If he could just get above this channel here, it could wake up. Tesla, again, this was my number one short idea coming into today's session. Again, who cares? If you're in this business and you know, it's all about getting likes and all about being right. You're in the wrong business. It's all about price action. So all of a sudden, just like on a dime, this thing not only did not confirm Friday's price action, but it started reclaiming levels. So if Tesla can just reclaim this 10 day moving average, maybe it wakes up again. So there's a lot of value every single day when you do in your prep work. The question is always not, you know, not whether it's right or wrong technically. The question is how many things are actually going to confirm? And that's always the case of being a non-biased trader. Again, you have an opinion, you did your research, you put in the work, but you can't paint yourself in a corner because if you do, you're gonna be fighting price action and the most important part is you're gonna be bleeding money until you're right. And the end game is always the same. Can you be right before you lose your solvency, right? And that's kind of the name of the game and that's unfortunately what happened to players in GME, both long and short, AMC, both long and short, so forth and so on. So again, it's not about being right. It's about being profitable or at least not going on till. And that's a very, very important part of this type of environment that is so juiced up mentally and so emotionally charged up and a lot of people are just focusing on, you know, let's stand together, it's unified, it's all versus them instead of actually taking the price action for what it was. So let's talk about today's pivots. Again, I was watching for the IWM, right? This is like, you know, I was watching, I go, listen, this thing goes red. And the funny thing is the early value in the morning today was all on the short side. Things really got pulled. At one point the doubt was up like 350 or so. You saw really good polls today in Facebook, in Netflix, in plug, right? So really good, really aggressive polls. So in a weird way, you could be wrong on the indexes and still be technically right. So let's talk about this. So IWM, we were watching obviously Green Thread never got there. Matter of fact, IWM not only had a good day, it reclaimed all levels of supply. Again, this market is bananas, absolutely bananas. And sometimes you just turn around and say, I have no idea what's going on. And that's me turning around right now and saying, I'm clueless, I'm absolutely clueless. I have some long plays for my watch for tomorrow. I have some short plays when I'm watching, but honestly, I am completely clueless.  And the most important part is you have to patiently wait to see what confirms. So let's talk about the action. Everybody, right? Social media, top watch, SLV is break. Okay, SLV went up like 40 cents. And I said, look, this is really not my thing. So it took out 27, 40, went to like 28 and just got destroyed. Just based, anybody bought it after the open got hit. FUBU, 47, 75, 48 needs to build, got upgraded this morning. Again, FUBU really, really big move. The catalyst came and traded actually as high as the $54 after the close. Watch those buyers guys, watch those out of the money call buyers if they continue to call back. TSIA's SPAC name, 1580, excuse me, 1480, 15 needs to build. Here was TSIA, right? Close pretty much at the highs. I think if this thing gets above 16, it should go more. So keep an eye on this TSIA for tomorrow, but almost a dollar move there. ADMS, nobody had a chance to trade. It opened up at 625, actually ran to 750, got halted, some sort of FDA news and stock went to like nine and change actually, but I'm pretty confident to say nobody got this trade. Plug, I shorted, got some pretty good cash flow right away. 62.30, 62 for builds below can flush. Here was plug, right? Here was plug, traded down initially into the 61.20s, then all the way down to the 60 area before kind of reclaiming again flush as a flush as a flush, Amazon. And again, this is how weird this tape was. The initial response was look, 32.60 for cash flow move, report tomorrow. Now what's cash flow on Amazon? 20 points, 15 points. Yeah, Amazon hold my beer. Amazon got above, right? Amazon got above this 32.60 is almost at 33.50, just a six sick move. And a lot of you guys are still holding calls. If you could just clear out this channel, one more move tomorrow ahead of earnings could give a nice move ahead of the release of numbers tomorrow. So if you're still holding a good job there, AG 24 needs to build, it traded literally to 24. NVIDIA 519 for builds below can flush. Here was NVIDIA. The funny thing is I actually liked NVIDIA to the upside tomorrow. But here was the 519 flush, right? Here's the 519 and it went down to 516 before a nice reversal. So that's how weird this day was. You're actually getting value to the downside here as well. So take on the way down, take on the way up. Monster move, NEO, not a big move. 55 held twice for builds below can flush. Here was NEO, not a big move at all. So it broke the 55, went down to like 54.30s and then stock came back up. Again, market's very, very strong now. If you quarter for cash flow, good job. Here was this little sucker. NAK for all you small cap lovers, any close over 69.70 is good. NAK had a nice little move, really nice move. So here's the 69.70 and the stock only went to 85 cents. Actually pretty amazing if you traded this thing. Really good move there, I wanna move. And I believe that's it, right? I think that's it. So look, it's a crazy tape. What else can you say? I mean, it's very, very hard to really try to digest everything that happens on a day-to-day basis. Tomorrow, I'll watch Tesla, I'll watch NVIDIA, I'll watch Intel, more NVIDIA than Tesla, let's be honest. We'll watch Amazon for another spike. But again, can anything happen? Anything does and everything will. Guys, God bless, I wish you the best. Stay safe, everybody, I'll see you tomorrow.


Live from Orlando, Florida, it's theCUBE, covering Cisco Live 2018, brought to you by Cisco, NetApp, and theCUBE's ecosystem partnership. Welcome back, this is Stu Miniman, and you're watching theCUBE's coverage of Cisco Live 2018 in Orlando, Florida. Happy to welcome to the program, welcome back to the program first, Vinu Thomas, who's the CTO of Presidio, and welcome to the program for the first time, Brad Hizinski, who's a general manager with Intel. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. Thank you Stu for having us. All right, so we're about the midway point to the show. It actually been many years since I'd been at Cisco Live, 26,000 people here, seeing a large transformation in what's going on from Cisco, still dominant in the network space, but talk a lot about cloud. We're here in the DevNet zone, where one of the big news pieces was 500,000 developers registered on the platform here. What's your take on the show so far? Yeah, I mean, Presidio has been a long-term partner with Cisco. We've been a golden master partner for the longest time. As Cisco started to really transition into the software-defined world, Presidio started investing along with Cisco. So back at the DevNet zone, you'll find that Presidio has a number of showcase items about DevOps, especially on things like Cat9k and Hyperflex. So we are excited on this partnership with Cisco and with Intel and what we are trying to do, so good times. Yeah, Brad, same for you. So absolutely, I think this is my fifth Cisco live and seeing the evolution of Cisco as they traverse from becoming a hardware-centric company into a company that's truly evolving around software and services and capabilities as the world becomes more complicated, they're truly innovating in ways to create the business outcomes that customers are looking for in these complicated environments. And as Intel, it's been really exciting because we transform it to a data-centric company. We talk a lot about that. The Intel technology has been the underpainting of many of the Cisco technologies that are continuing them down this path. And of course, our great partnership with Presidio, it just, it's a great triangulation effect and it's great to see at Cisco live. Venue, change isn't always easy. I think back actually, I've worked a long time on the vendor side and when Cisco came out with UCS and started doing things like VBlock, there were some folks at Presidio who were like, we make a lot of money racking, stacking, cabling, these solutions. Converged infrastructure, hyper-converged infrastructure, cloud solutions. Talk a little bit about the partnership, how Presidio's been helping to expand and mature with these offerings. Yeah, you know, the whole digital transformation is the one that's driving this move from legacy three-tier architecture into conversion to hyper-converge into multi-cloud. And what we've realized along this journey is we had to transform ourselves. So we went from saying, you know, we wanted to be the number one digital transformation solutions provider building secure digital infrastructure in a multi-cloud world. And for us to be in a position to put that vision into execution, we had to really partner with Cisco, partner with companies like VMware and VBlock and obviously the other providers from the hyper-converged space and also with Intel to really try and take our ability to not just rack and stack, but to design solutions. So we created what we call as Presidio Data Center solution set where we bring all this together. We're able to do some custom modification on these things. And we had to do that because that's what our customers were asking us for. And then wrap that around with managed services so we can essentially offer a true platform as a service. Yeah, I'd love to hear from your viewpoint. What are your customers saying to you when, you know, they say, I've got a cloud strategy or I'm building my cloud strategy. What does that mean to them? What's important to them? And you know, I'm sure you've got solutions that fit. Yeah, we've seen a slight change. It used to be that it was a cloud-first strategy. And now I would kind of call it as a cloud-right strategy which is let me choose the right cloud for the right type of workload, make sure that I have an optimized workload placement in which cloud. And one of the value ads that we bring is we can evaluate all those workloads and applications and your use cases like your data center and then recommend to you in partnership with Cisco and Intel what is the right placement for your workload. Now when you look at what is coming up in the future is, you know, the world is getting into containers and you look at Cisco's strategy with containers, you know, their Cisco container platform, what they're doing with Google. Presidio is right in the center of that along with Intel where we are building solutions in a multi-cloud fashion. So Hyperflex for the on-prem, running on top of Hyperflex is a Cisco container platform. And then we are able to then take that and merge that with Google Cloud. That's what customers want. They want that flexibility to say if this is the workload that needs to be on-prem, great. If this is something that I need to move as my applications get container rights, that's what they want to go to. Brad, I mean, you've got a large team playing in all of these environments. I remember, you know, optimizations for virtualization back in the day. When I was first learning about containers Intel Developer Forum was one of the places I went to go learn about this. But build on what Vinu was saying as to, you know, where your teams are making bets and helping to, you know, optimize and build solutions for customers. No, absolutely. I think Vinu said it very well. Especially if you auger in on the world of cloud. One of the challenges I think enterprise customers have really had is it's about clouds economics. I think that's basically the underpainting of what Vinu was talking about is that the economies of scale and capability of the large public cloud service providers have caused most enterprise customers to pause. So I think what customers are really looking for is how do I deploy applications with scalability, with ease of deployment, while having policy around security, networking, compute storage, et cetera. And then move the applications around the data center. What Intel does is we work very closely with Cisco as they're designing a lot of these platforms. Hyperflex as an example is, you know, utilizing, best utilizing some of the underpinnings of the C compiler or whether it's the ISL instruction set, the storage acceleration libraries which are part of the CPU telemetry in which they can take the code from SpringPath and really fine tune it to get the best performance. And then by the time Presidio gets it in-house, they further fine tune it for the customer needs. And so it's just a great triangulation. And then we want to scale when Cisco scales in the market Intel wins across the entire stack of compute network and storage. So therefore, it's very, very, we're all in the same boat row in the same direction. It's a very good point to the partnership. Yes, it's so funny because so much of this wave, we talk a lot about simplicity. And it's like, oh, well, HCI and public cloud, we're going to make it really simple. It's going to be heterogeneous.  It's like underneath the covers, there's a lot that goes in to make sure that it's, I say we're in a world of hyper-optimization because there's a lot of things that have to, to talk a little bit about that. So a perfect example of that is what we built in partnership with Intel and Cisco is a Presidio data center solution set. So the challenge our customers were having is, yeah, it's great to get a hyper-converge but the hyper-converge has to plug into something. It has to be on a rack. It has to be, power cooling has to be measured. We have to get telemetry data using Intel CPU. So what we decided to do was we built a custom-based solution, call it a cloud in a box with hyper-converged, with the networking gear in it, with advanced software solutions, with power cooling and we wrapped around our professional services and managed services. And what we also helped our customers to do is if they decided that they want to consume this as a service in an RPEX model, we could do that. If they wanted to do it in a CAPEX, we could do that. So we made it very flexible because it's not just about hyper-converge. Hyper-converge has to connect. Hyper-converge has to be load balanced. Then there's a possibility that you want to connect to a GCP or an AWS. So there was a lot of things that we could do with that. Yeah, Brad, we talk about customers want to have a similar operating model, whether it's in their data center or outside of their environment. I think Intel at the bottom layer helps, but how do you help make sure there's flexibility as customers choose all of their various solutions in a multi-cloud world? Well, first and foremost, I think that has a lot to do with we have a significant partnership with most of the public cloud service providers. It's no secret that, whether it's GCP, it's AWS, or it's Azure, or even Baidu Ali Baba Tencent, that these data centers are built upon Intel technologies. And then as you get back into the on-prem data center at the enterprise, the close work we do with Cisco and with partners like Presidio, I'll give you a perfect example is, when you look at one of the strengths Cisco has had traditionally over the years, it's this developer community. And it was the developer community what seems to have been born in networking, the networking space, and it's really created scale for Cisco. Well, as you look at the nascent technologies, there's two things we see. One is application developers inside of the enterprise IT don't have a simple way to build applications. So they go do a swipe on AWS, start an instantiation and write an application. But with things like OpenShift and working with Cisco on a Red Hat enterprise easy DevOps platform, or things like container development. We work very closely with Google and GKE on the Kubernetes development and the Kubernetes engine, as well as with Cisco. And so then when you bring that all together and you say, now we have a developer community of a technology which is clearly the future which is containers. And Cisco working with Intel, Cisco working with Presidio, Intel working with Presidio, it's really a three-legged stool and how do we refine the capabilities and also help define the future roadmap requirements in order to become, add more value for the customers. And I think that's just to piggyback to what Brad said. I think that's a key aspect to write is when you look at our customers, when they ask us to come up with stuff, Cisco, Presidio, Intel, we are not shy to make those investments because there might be customer requirements that are very unique and it's almost bespoke that we have to work on those kind of solutions and it's great to have partners that are ready to invest with us and make those investments and make those changes. Great, I want to give you both a final word. What should we look for going forward? Some areas maybe that you're pushing new solutions and you talked about analytics and the like. What should we look for as the partnership continues to grow in the future? Yeah, so when you look at Presidio's go-to-market here, we are focused on three key areas. One is digital infrastructure, multi-cloud and then security. And in addition, we want to really focus on data analytics and business insights. So digital infrastructure for us is the whole software-defined infrastructure that's getting more and more automated and orchestrated. Multi-cloud, you know, you're going to see us make more investments in container technology as well as working with companies like Google and Intel in the whole GKE, the Google Kubernetes engine. And then in the security part, at the end of the day, everything that we do has to be secure. It's not about putting point products, it has to be a full-fledged strategy. And then the last thing our customers are asking us is we've built us this software-defined infrastructure in a multi-cloud along with security. Can you give me business insights? So this is where we're working very closely with Intel and Cisco on Tetration, which is the whole network flow and security analytics that, you know, obviously is powered by the telemetry from Intel CPUs. And you're going to see us make more investments there with Tetration, with, you know, obviously app dynamics and companies like Splunk. So I think that's what you're going to see us do a lot in the future. Yeah, and I think, well said, Manu, and I think at a very basic level, all of the software, all the complexity, all of the security is going to require more insatiable desire for compute. But Intel's clearly investing beyond compute. We're very open about becoming a data-centric company, looking at about how this tidal wave of data is coming in a world of billions of connected devices. So as Intel continues to invest, whether it's in FPGAs, storage, memory technologies, you know, the blog for the launch of Hyperflex 3.5 just went out, an all-NVME version of Hyperflex. And then we're going to talk on Thursday about using Optane, Intel Optane technology as a caching tier. FPGAs over into Silicon Photonics technology. There's just a wealth of capabilities in Silicon that Intel's bringing the market to bear. And working with our partners, again, like Presidio, to understand, by the way, the way we do business at Intel is, we have an account team that also calls on Presidio. And what we do is our team triangulates with them. So Presidio is understanding the future roadmap of technologies from Intel. At the same time, Cisco is understanding it. Cisco then can innovate on platforms based on Intel technologies. But as Presidio knows what's coming down the pike, they can start building their plans for how they can then take it from Cisco's hands further encapsulated into a valuable offering, say cloud in a box, as you said so well, and deliver easy business outcomes for the customers. Yeah, absolutely. For a long time, we watched the TikTok coming out of Intel as what drove innovation and new advancements in the industry. Now everyone's moving faster. Even Intel, it's not the chip itself. That is the driving factor of all the change. So Brad, Vinu, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you so much. I really appreciate all the updates and congrats on the progress. All right, we'll be back here with lots more coverage. Three days wall-to-wall coverage of Cisco Live 2018 here in Orlando. I'm Stu Miniman and thanks so much for watching theCUBE.


Welcome to World's Best Videos, we've come by the list of facts about social media sensation Niels Weisser. Let's get into it. For those unfamiliar with Niels, he is a model and aspiring DJ who has gained an immense following across social media, particularly on Twitter and Instagram. Niels Weisser was born on September 26, 1998 in Phoenix, Arizona. He is currently 18 years old and resides in New York City. He attended Corona the Amar High School in Newport Beach, California. Weisser was on the selling team while attending high school. He has a sister named Kendall Weisser and two loving parents. Kendall has had a huge influence in his life and was one of the reasons why Niels got into the modeling industry. He also worked for his father's company which provided services in the medical field. Niels has graced the pages of Bogue and Fashionista and has opened fashion shows owning the runway for many brands. He has done work for companies like Dolce & Cabana, American Eagle, Maybelline and Vanity Team Magazine. He is currently represented by IMG Worldwide according to his Facebook page. When he was 8 years old, he was running his first business which was a car washing business. He is now the owner and founder of the clothing line website called Living Regal. He is extremely popular on Vine having amassed over 31 million video loops. Niels Weisser was nominated as Social Media Star of 2016 by Models.com. In an interview he did with Colorista Squad, he displays his tattoos. He shows the tattoo that's inside of his mouth that says Regal. The reason for the tattoo was because a few years back he was going to live his life Regal. Regal basically means that he can do whatever he wants in life because he can. Even though he had mentioned that he is not a fan of social media anymore, he sure is growing his pages at amazing rates. He has over 440,000 likes to his self titled Facebook page. On Instagram he has amassed over 2 million followers and is following 155 people. On YouTube he only has 3 amazing videos but still has over 50,000 subscribers. On Twitter where he shares his thoughts and opinions he has over 221,000 followers and is following over 1,000 people. Well that concludes the video guys hopefully you guys did enjoy and if you did remember to smack that like button let us know in the comment section below which you'd like to see next and if you haven't already subscribed please do subscribe to keep up with the world's best videos.


My name is Johanna Kinyavich and I'm Head of Outreach and Engagement at the Institute of Physics. Well, I mean, I could say that the Institute of Physics is a professional society for physicists, but alongside seeing physics as something that you can study and have a successful career in, we see it as part of our culture and something that can be seen through many different lenses, including art. This project started with the Institute of Physics and wanting to expand its Physics and Arts in Conversation series, which was initiated by IOP fellow and physics writers Gwairin Farmalay. And they'd already done projects with the Royal Opera House and the Royal Shakespeare Company, and they approached me as a contemporary art curator to build a relationship with the Visual Arts Organisation that they could then continue this series into. Light and Dark Matters is a collaboration developed between the Institute of Physics and Tate Modern in celebration of the International Year of Light, in which we bring artists and scientists together to explore light, dark and dark matter. My name's Marianne Mulvey and I'm Curator of Public Programs at Tate Modern. Light and Dark are concepts that many contemporary artists are working with today. They are asking the big questions about perception, about the politics of light, who has access to it, how are we using it, what is the cost to our world and they're also using Light and Dark to think about our place within the universe. At Sunrise, Astronomer Lucy Green brought a group of about 20 people for a walk along the South Bank to explore the activity of our nearest star, the Sun, and see London waking up. Our big discovery was that the Sun is this dynamic, violent object and that has a real impact on us, even though you might not appreciate it. My name's Lucy Green and I'm a space scientist working at UCL. The Sun isn't just a scientific object, it's also been a source of inspiration for art for centuries. The Sun is there in our myths and legends but also in our literature and in particular Shakespeare writes a lot about the Sun. Artists collective The Drawing Shed are pioneering a new technology at Tate Modern today, invisible ink typewriters in which they're inviting members of the public to come record of their thoughts and their experiences of the things that we keep in the dark. Part of what we're doing is to look at the hiddenness of some of the things which we want to explore as artists, which are around issues of democratic access to light and we use black light in order to explore those things as a metaphor. The first session we brought together the mathematical physicist Robert Degraaff, the artist Lillian Lin and the artist and theorist Sean Kubit in a conversation called The Power of Light where they discussed what compels artists and scientists alike to make advancements and discoveries with this energy.  Children are all scientists after all. They're always curious, they're always learning. For the conversation Are We Darkened By Light, we brought together the astronomer Narik Kukula, artist Katie Patterson, cosmologist Catherine Heymans and the architect Azif Khan. As an astronomer I think we really have lost touch with the stars and with the night sky. More than half the world's population live in cities and urban areas now and of course with the street lights, which we need to see our way around at night it does block out the stars. That's part of our natural heritage, it's something that for thousands of years people took for granted and now we're completely blind to it. For Light Duck Capture we invited a really influential Instagram photographer called Oliver Lang to invite Instagrammers across the globe to share their images of transformational light. In addition to that we've got a couple of light sources which we're playing with because photography is about reacting to light so one of them is a laser so we're using a laser and a droplet of water to spread the laser light and actually project the contents of that droplet of water which is a whole lot of microbes we've put in there. Harnessing Light is a conversation between the artists Roger Hyans the collective flow motion Harold Haas and Kishan Dalakia chaired by Sean Kubit. So in the future wireless data communication or wireless data will be served by all the lights around us. At the end of the day artist Susan Shipley takes a group of people for a walk along the South Bank exploring materiality of light and the politics of light. I can sort of meld a kind of quasi-artist talk or reflections on sun and the sort of materiality of sunlight which has been important in my practice and see if we can sort of sync that up if you will with a kind of walk. I feel like Like in Dark Matters has sparked off series of conversations between artists and physicists and really highlighting the ways in which art can interrogate physics from a slightly different perspective and this is something that I'm hoping that we can build on in the future.


Hi, and welcome to this screencast where we're going to use anti-derivatives to find the distance traveled by a moving object. Let's recap what we know so far about finding distance traveled by a moving object. Mainly, what we know is that to do this we need to have a graph or table present that gives us the velocity of the object. Then we estimate the distance traveled by the object over a time interval by subdividing the time interval appropriately and then forming a rectangle sum, and then the sum of the areas present estimates the distance traveled. Now we said earlier and you read in the section that what we're doing here is going backwards from our usual method of derivative taking. Earlier in the course we learned that if we are given position and take a derivative we end up with velocity. Now we are given velocity and we're trying to find out something about position. So we're going backwards through the derivative process and we're going to call this backwards process anti-differentiation. Here's an important definition. If we're given a function g then the function f is said to be an anti-derivative of g if f prime equals g. So f is a function whose derivative is the given function g. And this is our situation here. We're given velocity which is the derivative of position and we need to work backwards to find position. We'd say in this language that position is an anti-derivative for velocity because taking the derivative of position gives velocity. We can use anti-derivatives to find distance traveled as follows. If we're given an object's velocity function as a formula then we first try to find an anti-derivative for velocity which will be another formula. Let's call that anti-derivative s of t and this s of t in some way represents the position of the object relative to a starting point because s prime is velocity. And so s of t has the right fingerprints to be the object's position. Then we'll simply compute s evaluated at the ending time minus s evaluated at the starting time. This gives us a difference in position which is another way of saying the distance traveled. So let's do a concrete example. Here's the function for velocity that we used in screencast 412.  Now I claim that the following function is an anti-derivative for that velocity. Negative 0.75t squared plus 10t minus 1 half cosine of 2t. That is if I take the derivative of the second function I'll get my velocity function. Now on the next slide I'm going to verify this is indeed the case that if I take the derivative of this anti-derivative I end up with my velocity that I started with. And then I'm going to use the fact to find the distance traveled by the moving object on the interval from 0 to 5. So we were given a velocity function v of t equals negative 1.5t squared plus 10 plus sine 2t. I'm going to claim that the function s of t equals negative 0.75t squared plus 10t minus 1 half cosine 2t is an anti-derivative for that velocity. So all this requires is simply that I take the derivative of the thing that I claim is the anti-derivative and see if I end up with the velocity function. That would make the new function s of t an anti-derivative for velocity. So here I have set up the derivative of my anti-derivative and hopefully they will sort of cancel each other out and I'll end up with v of t. So let's chug through the derivative process here. So I'm going to take the derivative first of all of this first term and that would give me negative, there's a 2 times 0.75 times t. The derivative of 10t is 10. I have a minus 1 half and now the derivative of cosine 2t is going to be negative sine 2t. And then I have to use the chain rule and take the derivative of the 2t on the inside and that gives me a 2. Now let's just see what this shakes out to be. I have several cancellations I can do. The 1 half and the 2 cancel. I have a minus and a minus and makes a plus. And let's just keep working here. Negative 2 times 0.75 is negative 1.5. That's times a t. I was adding on a 10 and now all that's left over here is the sine of 2t. And that is indeed equal to what I said it should be equal to velocity. So this function s of t is actually an anti-derivative for velocity because its derivative is velocity. Now the point of finding this anti-derivative for velocity is that this is in some ways something like a position function for my moving object. And so I can use it to find the distance traveled. We're going to look at the distance traveled by this object over the interval from 0 to 5. So I'm going to take my position and figure out where it was at 5 and subtract off where it was at 0. And that difference there should give me the difference between the starting position and ending position. That's the total distance traveled. So now I have a formula for s, which I had on the other side. Let's carry that over to here. I'm going to put 5 in and put 0 in and then subtract. So s of 5 would be negative 0.75 times 5 squared plus 10 times 5 minus 1 half cosine of 2 times 5, which is 10. And now I'm going to subtract off and in this bracket is going to go s of 0. That would be negative 0.75 times 0 squared. That's just a 0 plus 10 times 0. That's also just a 0. Minus 1 half cosine of 2 times 0 and that's also a 0. A lot of things in that second set of brackets will go away for us. The first set of brackets will be negative 0.75 times 5 squared is about equal to, should make that approximately equal to negative 18.75. 10 times 5, of course, is 50. Minus 1 half cosine of 10 is not anything sort of natural. It just comes out to be negative 0.419536. That's accurate to six decimal places. And inside here I have 0, 0, and cosine of 0 is equal to 1. And so this becomes a negative 1 half inside the square brackets there. Now I'll skip all the arithmetic here and just say this comes out to be about 32.1695. That's in meters because this estimate here is of a distance travel. And if you remember back to screencast 4.1.2, we did some pretty high level estimates of that distance travel. For example, using 25 rectangles. And it was coming out to be pretty close to 32. So this is a very good estimate here. In fact, it's highly accurate. We could actually make this an exact quote unquote estimate by instead of writing this decimal expansion here, just keeping it at cosine of 10. So with antiderivatives, we have a way of actually finding the exact value of the distance traveled by this moving object. So with all that, why should we ever use estimates at all when finding distance traveled? When we can get a lot more accuracy using antiderivatives. Well, there are two main reasons. First of all, we have to have a formula for velocity in order to do any of this. And that just doesn't always happen. In fact, most functions in real life are given as graphs or tables of data or verbal descriptions. And formulas are very hard to come by sometimes. So this method of antiderivatives is not a method that applies in many cases. Second, even if we do have a formula for velocity, finding an antiderivative for that formula could be hard or even impossible. You might be wondering, rightly so, where did I even come up with the antiderivative for velocity that we saw in the previous slides? And that would be a good question. Guess and check would not be a very good approach. But systematic ways of finding derivatives can be very complicated. And much of second semester calculus is spent on techniques for finding these. And even so, again, some functions don't even have antiderivatives. So we can find distance traveled with great accuracy using antiderivatives in this process. But don't throw away the estimation techniques just yet.


Hi, I'm John DuVetter with the North Dakota State University Extension Service. I'm an area livestock specialist and I'm pleased to welcome you to our program on backgrounding calves in 2015. Each fall our ranchers have to make some production and marketing plans in typically about half of them wean their calves and feed them for a period of time to heavier weights which we call backgrounding. The fundamentals and factors which go into the profitability of this enterprise vary quite a bit from year to year. We've had recent years of extremely high grain prices. We've had years of rising rapidly rising cattle prices during this backgrounding phase but today 2015 we're faced with fairly cheap abundant feed and a cattle market which has been on the down slide. So I think to get things started here and get a little insight into the economics of what the potential is for backgrounding this year I'm going to ask a few questions of our livestock marketing economist Tim Petrie who's stationed at the NDSU campus in Fargo. So Tim I guess you know this market's really been moving a lot mostly down. What are your price expectations for the 550 pound kind of vaccinated calf coming off the cow going into the market today? Yeah sure I agree that we really have had a volatile market with last year record high increases and then the last couple of months we've had a big downtrend main causes for the decline being a contra seasonal downward fed cattle market caused by many factors including a backlog of heavy cattle and record weights also record high pork production. You're going to hear record a lot today record high pork and poultry production in a stagnant export market. So yeah price expectations is a very good question somewhat difficult to answer probably due to the wide range in prices for the same weight and greater calves at the same market again due to many factors such as are they weaned or unweaned are preconditioned to have health programs and so on. So I expect another twenty to thirty dollar range like kind of happened last year and in prices at the same calves at the same market. And so as we can see in the chart we have a more normal seasonal pattern this year with declining prices in the second half compared to last year when they went up every year so keep that in mind. We are expecting calf prices to be about twenty five to thirty cent percent lower than last year so for example a 550 steer last year that brought 280 is closer to $200 even to 210 this year. Of course every market has good news and bad news for those selling calves the bad news is we're below last year and probably below earlier expectations of a few months ago but the good news is we still have the second highest prices ever but for those buying calves it's still going to mean that they're going to have to come up with a lot of money. I think we'll sell a lot of steer calves in that 195 to 210 area and again like always heifers are really discounted this time of the year twenty dollars are for the lower end even more so that puts them in about 175 to 190. Sometimes we see some preferences for the real light calves especially when we have a good winter wheat crop down south and they need some grazing animals. I would think with the price of wheat this year not looking too optimistic there'd be some interest in grazing. What do we see on the slide on the weight classes between lights and heavy? Okay yeah well we really haven't had a good test the light calves yet because we have such good conditions out in North Dakota and there hasn't been much weaning or light calves brought to market but for sure the price slide is a lot less than it has been the last couple of years there are several reasons for that. Most of the calves coming to market now are not weaned or preconditioned and are balling calves and that's typical of an early market again not many being sold. You mentioned winter wheat and that is the big one. Winter wheat planting is way behind schedule particularly in Texas and Oklahoma and it's dry down there and so that market has not materialized yet with the weather pattern where we they are expecting rain and we hope that we get it but so far that is not materialized and so the market is really encouraging producers to wean and precondition calves. Looking at the charts for instance for last week average 550 steers were about 205 but the 750 dates were only $10 behind at 195 so last year the market was $40 different so we need that winter wheat crop to really materialize to get any spark in those lighter calves. Well you've given us pretty good indication where she's trading in this early market and also said they were kind of seasonally normal trying to slide down as the runs of calves come to town. Can we expect some when we can hit a seasonal low and when can we expect some recovery or is this all guessing games? Yeah well that's a good question and yeah calves do usually reach a seasonal low in November when all the cattle come off of pastures and the big runs hit the market as the chart shows the market has already declined since August about 20 to 25 percent so the big seasonal decline is behind us in fact it's one of the largest in history declines here in the last couple months so some weakness still may occur especially in those unweaned calves without a health program or you know that are the less optimistic calves there but and you know there's a lot of volatility uncertainty in the market which causes buyers to be a little bit more reluctant on those calves that don't have a health program and so on but if we can get some rain in the winter wheat belt and get some seasonal strength back in the feeder in the fed cattle market so that is which is possible that would support prices however we're not going to go back to last year's prices for sure and cyclically we are on the downtrend so we need to keep that in mind. Well we know backgrounding works really well when you're in a rising market because then the price cattle get more valuable every day you got them and you feed them and take care of them. Big question now is what are these six seven eight hundred pound feeders going to be worth come January February March because if we had a good idea on that then we kind of know how this is going to pan out. Yeah that's always the sixty four dollar question and while calf prices tend to increase after the first of the year the heavier weights often do decline after the first of the year would be a normal seasonal pattern however the range in prices for those heavier weight cattle do narrow because they have been weaned they have had a health program and so on January to March feeder cattle futures are trading below cash prices now in fact just a couple weeks ago they were a lot lower they've rebounded 10 to 12 dollars so we've got January futures in it about 180 now and the March futures in a little dollar so lower than that still below the CME cash settlement price which is all six fifty to eight fifty calves so the futures is still discounted to the current cash market so I think there is a first step we do have to look at the futures market as a target hopefully we can get some strength as I mentioned before back in that fed cattle market and we can do better than that but also keep in mind that there's always risk in a volatile market so producers need to keep that in mind as well. Well we got a little idea where the cattle are trading where they might be going using the futures of a bit of a guide feed is fairly cheap interest is kind of low fuel cost is down quite a bit what would be your cost-to-gain target for calves doing that two to two and a half a day in a background program. Yeah okay feed prices do vary quite a bit across the state and we do have a wide variety of feed stuffs and speakers later are going to discuss some of those it even depends on if you're selling corn to the elevator versus buying corn there might be a 30 cent difference there so that obviously affects our bottom line but you know I think now we should look at the low 50s for a cost-to-gain some certainly with lower feed costs and lot costs and so on will do it in the 40s a few might even be up in the 60s but let's shoot for those lower $50 range is a good starting point. Well that is kind of with those kind of cost-to-gain projections and kind of our slide on the weight classes narrowing up this year when you put it all together what's the budget show a little room here to make some money. Yeah absolutely on my website I have an Excel spray a sheet that producers can use plug-in their own information there's also a calf web break even budget there so in the example you see on the screen now I just brought in a 550 weight calf at $205 and then a 750 calf out at $175 in January March whatever you want to use I have a two and three-quarter pound to gain corn at $3 again corn is kind of all over the board my example shows about a $50 per head return and interestingly enough I went back to last year at this time when calf prices were a lot higher 280 calves were projecting 230 out came out to $50 last year at this time so the market does try to I think encourage some backgrounding and some return there and very similar to last year but you know it looks like we can background calves as we all know however there are many factors that affect calf prices and there is risk and we've seen that in the last couple years but that's how it looks right now. Well thank you Tim for sharing those insights into the economics maybe backgrounding this year is there anything else you want to pass along as we close. Well you know again going back to that wide range in calf prices and if you look at the bottom level and add value to some calves that helps heifers are always discounted this time of the year and sometimes are really a nice market class to background because every 50 pounds we gain prices on steer calves so you know just look for some of the best opportunities there for making some money. Thanks.