Oh my god, man. I Guess so dude That's my fault just chuck the ball up forget a read we're just want to chuck the ball up to Tyree kill Good call though.  Good call bro. Good call. Yeah, it's kind of nice that dude. He chucked it to the 90s I like what Miles Sanders is showing me today boys. I like it. I'm not at all mad at boys That can't be two yards What could I have done right there? What could I have done? I feel like I could have got busy right there. I Feel like I got to just stick with this inside zone to I feel like it's popping pretty good for me right now.  Julio that's why we got them in the first round. What a catch man. God damn.  Just stay at him telling you I'd like to look some getting against this defense man Exactly. What did that animation does get knocked out every time but Julio brought his big nuts from playoff time Tyree Tyree he'll out.    I was just too afraid to Tyree kill right there. Shame run I was just too afraid to Tyree kill right there.    Hit him man.   He just runs everybody else That's the bunch here. We go. Oh my god. I'm so asked for that.  This one be a snap inside zone right here First thing I'm garden is inside zone or this you know No, don't run out of the box Scared man if you scare go to church chat You scare go to church chat I'm out of that one run go off now is it might be another snap throw to the middle of the field Might be one of those. I don't know what snap throw to the middle. I'm not gonna decode that I'm not even worried about that. I'm not even remotely worried about setting up the blitz I'm not even like that's not I'm just gonna stop the snap throw.  Oh? Man, oh, come on game. Don't give him points blindly.  All right, man two minutes left. I'm not gonna play. No, uh, I'm not gonna give up No more points. I just gotta play some decent office.  Good tackle. Good tackle. That was looking meaty chat.  That was it looking meaty They put seven people in coverage over there.      I can't wait to play this new CFM with my homes.  I don't want Tyree kill touching the ball on this kickoff. I Mean it was it was third and 18 David like what's my other call chuck it and get in completion and make him not use the time out Fully could expect just a run right here fully could expect just run See if I'm could start tonight that dude answered me I will take a look at my team when this game is over But I had the chiefs just know that I had the chiefs What if all we gonna find somebody to use around defense? Brandon, what's up man? 18 seconds left Humble just come out run strong wing. Come on man strong wing.  Stop being cute.  You can't run another post. Here we go strong wing seven running backs or seven tight ends in the game Come on. Let's see it. Oh gun bunch. We're still gun bunching.  I think 1,000 percent. That's always the cause three deep right there Except maybe in salary cap when you don't have fast everybody being fast DB's maybe you need a couple more linebackers out there But I think that's always the call.  Just quick snap dive Call time out.  God Ken folk my guy. What's up, man? With the sub. Thank you. I appreciate it. Put some pennies in the chat for him I'm really in a slobber knocker right now. Dude. Just turn the ball over already for me This is worse than without enforcers like no way to make him fumble with what I'm called it Good job boys. Way to be there. Way to be there. Look at this Herman. Boom.  Oh green hunt going out wide.  What am I playing against right now?  Oh my god, man This is a good drive. It's a good drive I just gotta get them in the longest I can't I can't get them in a long pass situation I mean, this is like just I'm just I'm like to do symbol. I am getting out. Hey, I'm not there's nothing bad going on right now You just gotta make a couple tackles It'll be good Like come on boys. Where are we at man?  No way a dive should be popping me like this man Christian Wilkins, that's your side kiddo I mean, dude, this guy is making lunch for tomorrow at work right now.   This is a drive from heaven from heaven right now Good drive, man.  You can't even be mad at this kid right now You can't be mad at him.  What?  All right Oh, I'll tell you what if he if he do all this walking if this man does all this walking If he does all this walking Like Moses If he does all this walking for three for three You can't do all this walking Got my water bottle. Oh man, you got to get off of this He should have snapped. He had me.  Come on. We're shot Melvin You have to you can't be getting bumped on somebody literally no Big fast fan, you know what big strap doesn't Don't get bumped on there you go. There we go. There we go. All right. Blitzing it up a linebacker Starting to beg dive third and goal from the four wolf man. What's the wolf man got?  You know what it is running back wheel right here 1 million percent and it doesn't matter what pass play his gun tight doubles It doesn't matter what pass he's in it is 1 000 percent Going to be a running back wheel right here Go pick.  That's a good drive though. Really honestly though Blitzing that linebacker saved me that drive switching that up I think one of y'all in the chat said just started blitzing every linebacker Blitzing that middle linebacker instead of keeping them in his man coverage Definitely definitely one that's held the three right there because one of those dies was going to pop in the ends on If I didn't do that. I swear y'all think I don't be why y'all think I don't be why it's listening to the chat man I'll be listening. I'll be listening to each of y'all boys, man Man, I don't know who just shed me that damn fast.  You tried it. It was close. You tried it. It was close Sam, okay. We like when they go to that Ah, I hate that, but I didn't like it. I didn't like it. I didn't like it I'm sorry chat. I know I know that's like against that's like a cardinal sin for me right there But I didn't like I didn't like what I saw Running back. Come on kid.       They are he's want to rage blitz That's okay. We still want to inside zone this Come on.    No, I can't run inside zone.  I just don't want to turn the ball over I feel like I can hold him out of field ball range chat. How you feel? How we feeling? I feel like I can just hold him out of field ball range Even if I do I don't want to lose giving him a field ball. That's all That's that's the exact call I should have did last time No, I can't go.   I mean he can run.  This is $600 a week, bro. I gotta like make my god at least make some I gotta make some I gotta make some mechanics beat me I just I had one bad play that drive was really bad. Honestly Strong each wing all we gotta do is stop this we can win I'm in trouble because melvin's not gonna run with him.     Tyree kill.  That's all Such an easy play.     I kicked the deep chat. I'm talking to y'all. I kicked the deep. So what?  He returned left, which is good.  I gotta press him or he could do that quick lookie pass, bro. I have to press him.    What happened with my other safety, bro? What What This is just it.   I that was worth the time out. That was 1000 percent worth of time out I thought covered too. I'd be able to audible to cover too.   Just absolutely worked right there Let's get it.  He's gonna Blitz everybody. I'm being trouble lost again Oh my god, man All right, that's ain't nothing crazy, but that's just awful man.  Just just the kid is awful Just just just awful.   I'm just I just tried to audible to cover too He does that motion killed me he audible to cover too. I tried to hurry up like where does this dude go, man?  Like But I had to move because it's covered too. I just had to move Lonnie Ballantyne out far enough to cover this So I'm panicking to move him out. Why?     What's on if I'm chucking it? It doesn't matter. What's out here?  God damn it, man Good game, man He didn't play bad. I let him run the ball too much really gave up those runs to Tyree kill when I can't give up anything else I can't give up and there's nothing else that could beat me but Tyree kill.    I definitely saw him throw off the back foot when I saw him throw that first of all I knew I was beat but once I saw him throw that I was like, all right, that's not gonna be complete That John was a super dot good game. No Disappointed in that he played great play smart.


We're starting all came together. I will say this is the Development Review Board for Burlington November 16 We are expanding seeing some technical difficulties With the website link and as people have signed in realize The original link was not operative and a new link has been sent out to people And it's posted now on the website and So just for board members Jeff and Chase I guess those of us here We do have an issue that People who want to participate may not be able to participate and so we're going to proceed with our meeting Understanding that people have a legitimate if people wanted to participate and they could not they have a legitimate gripe For us to have to reopen hearings Does that make sense everybody? That makes sense. Okay so We'll get started what we take up items for those I don't know who's listening to this now, but we take up items that they are on in the agenda And when we take up each item we ask the applicant either on Zoom or in person To participate and to sign in here or to give staff an address if they're on Zoom Well, hopefully this all will work Communications there are some communications that were posted for one 11 cultures to Avenue that were posted a little while ago I think those are the only new communications that we've had Okay Minutes there are no minutes posted right now. Okay, um, I see them I'm gonna get used to that week behind Okay. Yeah Okay, the first item on the agenda is is a consent agenda item 111 cochester Avenue there has been a request to Discuss this by matter member of the public Who is she is present? Okay? so with that we're going to treat 111 cochester Avenue not as a Consent but as a regular hearing is the applicant here Mary. Ah Okay Well, I know excitement you actually get to be And Mary can you Sharon is here Can she participate? Okay, so and if you would introduce yourself short gale Henderson King from Whitenberg representing Medical Center, okay, so we've got two people who are going to participate right now And I'm going to ask the applicant gale and the member of the public Sharon busher to swear that tell the truth The whole truth under pain and penalty of perjury Okay, and Since this was recommended for consent, which I'm sort of assuming you were okay with Then maybe what I like to do is hear what Sharon busher has to say the issue that she's raised. So Sharon. Do you want to go ahead and raise your concern? Thank you, I Haven't had a chance to see any updated communication. I Apologize I was appealing my property tax value and I just got done so I called Mary earlier today and The proposal to make this temporary structure permanent is really not something that I'm opposed to I think it's been there for a long time and has it blends in and it's been landscape. My question to Mary was I Don't know if indeed in the process of going from temporary to permanent There was a requirement to have somebody an engineer or someone look at the structure To determine if indeed it could become permanent temporary buildings potentially have life fans and I spoke about the I worked at the hospital full disclosure. I retired in 2019 and February of that year and Was what to module B frequently? and it was It was definitely you knew you were in a prefab Structure and so my question was for the safety of the employees. I Imagine that in this transition someone would evaluate the structure as far as Determining it now to become permanent and I wasn't once again for the chair and for the rest of the board I wasn't sure if that was germane, but it certainly was an issue that I felt compelled to raise Appreciate that Mary The last Ryan Standard conditions one through 15 isn't one of them that TPW So we might we might clarify that but Sharon, I think that's one of the standard conditions is that the issue that you're raising Which is really more building code issue is not really within our purview But I think I understand that to make sure that that's reviewed is what you're really asking about and I think we can Highlight that and the conditions Yes, and thank you. That was my point to make sure that it when the process Proceeded that someone would evaluate it to make sure that the structure was a stable and able to Be considered permanent. I wasn't sure if we had criteria that that the city had Established for going from one determination to another Thank you Do you have anything you want to ask or add or comment on at this point at this point We submitted this afternoon, which I believe is up on the web right now the latest Department of Public Safety Inspection that was done in February of 2021. Yes, so at this at this point Whatever conditions come with the permit. We're fine with Then we will when we deliberate we will Clarify that Building inspection request as part of the conditions This is any other comments at this point we will close public hearing Does the deliberation happen tonight? It'll happen tonight Hey The next item is 240 242 Pearl Street. Ah This is just like a regular meeting here and Ryan or Mary can you see if there's any members of the public who want to comment on 240 or 242 Pearl Street? Okay, you understand. There's a little bit of a caveat on what we're doing tonight. I do So and if you would introduce yourself your yes, hey Brad. Yes I don't know why I can't come in as a panelist, but I'm here and I'm listening and I'll only unmute myself when it's time to vote because I can't see or be seen We may not I've given the trouble I've had getting in tonight Oh now I can be Okay, I think you're legitimate now AJ there you are I just I think we should be careful about voting on anything tonight Well, you missed the beginning I Didn't miss the beginning. Yes. The link was wrong the link wasn't working so I posted a new link So it's entirely possible that members of the public and applicants may not have been able to get in a new link has been posted But not everybody has gotten to it So we're sort of proceeding with the understanding that If people raise an objection because they did not get a chance to participate that would definitely be grounds to reopen hearings And and take new testimony Point that might be a good one. We might don't want to vote tonight on these matters Yeah We can deliberate but not vote we might want to take that off at our December meeting Well, we're not gonna vote We may want to continue the hearings to allow people if they can't get in to easily show up the next meeting I think that's probably not an unreasonable kind of thing to do Instead of voting but I Agree, I think we vote tonight and then we find out later that we have to Reopen the meeting. We might as well hold off on the vote. Okay well To the first applicant that may revise what I said, so we'll see how it goes So for I guess it's just you who's participate Do you want to raise your right hand? Do you swear to tell the truth and hold truth on paying a penalty of perjury? I do. Okay, so you are requesting a sign That is I believe the sign the size that it originally was Yes, I would I'm The owner of Pearl Street Pipe and beverage a tenant of Lakeside Pharmacy Holdings July 1st 2020 our building was destroyed by fire. I Had the Continuing bad luck to be the only business that had its sign actually painted on to the storefront So we discovered in April we had to get a permit where all the other All five other signs are back up on the building. They were just cleaned or refaced and put back up our sign Was actually painted on to the front of the storefront. So we had to get a new sign Paint it on new material and put on to the store front Now it's been a long process confusing process and I understand the reason why I'm here now is Because the city is saying the sign is a different size than what was there But I submitted a picture I don't know if you can pull it up over the weekend of the old sign And it measures the same as the new sign that we put up the old sign was there in 1983 when I moved in has been there ever since We took the measurements right off of that Gave it to the sign people to fabricate the new sign So what I'm saying is I don't see if that's the reason it came for the real, you know I'm only going by what was there and I I That's the that's the new sign over the weekend. I posted a picture of the old sign With a tape measure in front of it showing that it's the same size At least I thought I did it. I don't know if you could pull up the picture. I posted I know we had pictures from the last time that you I did but no I did this over the weekend. I added, you know Believe I got it in properly Well, when it wasn't working at juncture my car I was on the phone on the way here Yeah, so if you can't pull it up The only thing I could do is pass my phone around. I'd like to ask a marriage I know I know you're doing six things The issue with the sign is a non-conforming sign that is destroyed It was a thing, you know, the joining break they just talk about if a sign is destroyed Isn't there can it be replaced the same size within a certain amount of time? Or it can't be replaced at the same year one year and So that was the issue when they came in the first time Was that we were as board had deemed that he had applied in a timely manner So if he applied in a timely manner, wouldn't he be allowed to keep the size the same as it was? Well, the first issue was the timeliness and the DRB's decision was to send it remand it back to staff for Continuance of review Replacement of a non-conforming sign requires DRB review right and the two choices are to be brought into substantial substantially greater conformity or To be conforming So staff's obligation was to go back and look to see what was permitted there and the last two Parallel signs for the front of the building were issued in 1980 and I've given in the staff report those dimensions That's three years before we open So that's all that's been permitted So that that's so I don't know what sign or even if those two signs were among those destroyed in the fire That's why no finding is possible The sign that he has proposed Does not equal the same dimensions of the two signs permitted in 1980 What would we have to do if What would he have to do if he wanted us to approve the sign that's currently up It would have You would have to be convinced it's in substantially greater conformity So that's one of the two choices that we have my understanding was this Hold on From what he has indicated to me from testimony here that he has replaced the sign to the same dimensions That was lost in the fire if that's true Then we have never done a permit for a sign of those dimensions Okay, but that I guess my question is different than that If we were to approve what is up now is that essentially saying that Could we do that under one of the two choices that we have Well, two signs have been permitted for the front if one of those If his replacement sign can be found to be Substantially more conforming than one of those signs then you can permit it And and from reading it's right. It's Just get the back down the sign that you're wanting to put up is what's the dimension of that? It's 10 feet by 20 inches Now can I ask a question here because there are right there? There are six signs on that building from the front of that building you keep only talking about two I've been there since 1983 when they overhauled that building at that time And that's when we put up the sign. I'm talking about That those are the dimensions that have been there since 1983 And like I said all the other signs including the liquor store sign that was my other sign That was permitted just to in in like 2018 They just took them down washed them and we put them back up I'm only trying to put back exactly what was there And we run into a problem that a lot of what goes on the city's not permitted And so then when something like this happens we have to do oh if it wasn't permitted What does that mean we have to do and can we approve it and this seemed like a rather minor kind of thing But it's it's part of a ongoing kind of issue Yes, Jeff Mary if The sign had been there more than 15 years And therefore Qualified for some sort of grant following or could be pursued as a violation under the statute of limitations and blah blah blah and it then was destroyed It seems to me that we would be looking at whether the person could replace the sign that otherwise Was there and allowable? But for the fire does that question make sense I don't understand the claim that the side has been up since 1983 doesn't really fit with Permitting the story we have you don't have a permit for it. It would be grandfathers There would have to be a determination that the sign has been there that length of time and so I guess my question for the applicant that is the sign you're seeing on the screen right now the Bell Street beverage sign Is that the sign that it's been on the building? Since you have been involved 1983 correct It's the size of the sign Right the size and so what is the size of that side? Sign you're looking at right now is 10 feet those panels measured 10 feet the Panel measures 24 inches with a 2-inch molding that went around the outer edge Brings it down to 20 inches So that's why we determined our new sign to be 10 feet 20 inches And the writing on the side the new side is a little different I think now No, actually though the lettering is Exactly the same size we abbreviated street my scene here that that the two that were permitted in 1980 were One six by 12 feet and two feet by 16 feet I've put the dimensions in the staff report And and one of those at least two feet by 16 feet is bigger than what the applicant has proposed In area in area And I think both with and length and so I think one of the options was if That the the new sign is more substantially conforming Right it's smaller it's so it would seem to Bypass these concerns Since what has been already permitted I'm not sure if I understand that correctly, but If you find that his replacement sign is more conforming than what was approved that is an option Can I ask a question you say you have two signs permitted for that building which The when I moved in in 83 we we had two signs So the there's now six signs on that building Four of them have nothing to do with me So those signs wouldn't be put they came along after me they wouldn't be permitted. I Have not included all the signage that it wasn't relative to your business There's pharmacy signage and there's signage on the west side of the building But I did not include those because what you were proposing to replace was a parallel sign on the south side of the building On the front of the building. Yeah Okay So there are there are other sign permits you're correct Permits This is more confusing to me. Do we know that the permits you're referencing are For this sign or they for different signs? I have referenced only permits that were approved for this location on the building Okay Okay, and a reminder that the sign regulations have more recently changed. That's why we're in this position But if one was approved for two feet by 16 feet and we had one of ten inches by 20 feet that would seem to be smaller And that is up to the DRB discretionary review Okay, I think we have While we can go around But I think we have a few facts in here that will help us Okay else you want to add at this point no like I said I'm just trying to and put my business back together here. Yeah, and we may as you raise concerns about Deliberating we may not vote tonight Apologies for that, but we don't vote. I we vote before the next meeting Genesis what we do is try to vote either Before this after the next meeting at two weeks The all set Thank you, we're gonna close the public hearing on this item. Thank you. Thank you Okay Oh, okay for tonight for For tonight for tonight. Yes. Well We can reopen it The next item is 53 front street and And I don't know if you heard the snafu with the Zoom link was incorrect And so we we've reestablished it But we don't really know if everybody who wants to be part of this hearing is able to be part of this hearing so We're reluctant to actually deliberate tonight. Okay, and We also have to leave the door open if somebody a week from now says hey I wasn't able to participate. We have to give them the opportunity So is anybody else we know if anybody else is here there is no one else in the attendee list Okay, so if you would raise your right hand You swear to tell the truth and whole truth on a pain and penalty of perjury. I do okay, so It's modern straightforward on a little lot with requests for a variance on coverage It's DRB discretionary review for additional coverage to establish an ADU. Yes, and can we Ryan's going to bring up some plans. Do you want to walk us through this? Sure What you're looking at there is the proposed new coverage and you can see the dashed lines are an existing garage That is going to be removed The my glasses don't quite reach that far but the existing garage 576 square feet it looks like and that the new ADU is 548 And that will also include so basically the the the vertical rectangle in the new construction is the ADU and then that little Side piece is a combination of kind of storage and shed and a sauna The Main house is Naturally down lower on the sheet. This is on front street Thank you So that dark area to the to the top of the page is the new ADU Storage and sauna and on the bottom right beside the vehicle is a second parking spot and Then kind of in an L around that parking spot is the proposed stormwater Additional stormwater Catch do you want me to go through the I think the zoning numbers or just to understand the Coverage yeah Well, it's interesting. I think the way I broke it down and the way Mary broke it down and here's a little bit different So I'll probably go through it the way Mary broke it down since that's probably more relevant than mine So the the existing house under the base coverage We've got the existing house 790 the existing parking at 104 and the proposed parking at 128 the new ADU at 548 The sauna storage at 153 and the condenser pad at four and a half feet and then under the bonus coverage We've got the porch the deck and the sidewalk out front so The the total base coverage Was 17 27.5 with the ADU Mary subtracted the area the ADU at 11 79.5 Plus the bonus coverage equals 14 88 or 38 point three six coverage That's without the ADU the entire lot coverage base plus bonus plus the ADU is the 20 36 and a half Which brings us to 52 point 48 percent? And this is our residential mediums. We have 40 plus 10 so 50 so we're 2.4 8% over the total allowable lot coverage And the issue is that we have discretion to give over it for an ADU Up to that very discreet amount and the condition is that the stormwater program approves mitigation measures To address stormwater flow and we receive that yesterday. That's your Retention area. Yeah. Yeah And and the allowable extra coverage is 650 square feet and we are Yeah, 548, but we're not that much over. We're not using out of the 650. I think we're looking at three 309 Additional 388 You don't need the full Additional number of the ADU you don't need any part of that. Exactly. Yeah Yeah Size structure building. Thank you. I want to see if any board members have any questions for the applicant I I think I may have answered it but Mary page page for you have minimum side Is 10% of luck over well you say it's five feet But the plan say 3.8 feet, but now I see the plans also say that it's based on 10% so based on on 10% of the lot width and this is a very tiny lot and It's And the existing setback for the house Yeah, yeah, it is compliant with setbacks. Yeah. Yeah, I see now. Okay 3d have a square feet is the lock size, right? 3880 I believe Okay, any questions from the board for the applicant Thank you. Yes, it's it's I think it'll be nice for them I Did also just as a I was sitting at my computer at five o'clock times. I don't know if you got my ah panic That's what you got back.  Yes, so I did identify lighting I can leave this with you and I can submit a digital copy upload it But essentially what it shows is there was a question about lighting These indicate the existing lights You know the doorways would each have new lights. I don't have the fixtures selected, but they would naturally be downlights And they would be located at each door The trash and recycling was located inside the existing garage and it will be relocated to inside the storage space So that will be outside inside and hidden And then the mailbox currently there's a mailbox on the front porch of the house and they'll put the adu mailbox in the same location beside it So that was I think those were the primary and the storm water I attached the the erosion prevention and sediment control approval So you have that and I think the storm water was also approved By james charard So and I can leave these like I said with you and if you can submit them digitally for I will do yep Yeah Are you keeping the tree that's in that part? We are trying to keep the tree. Yep. We're looking at um Doing helical piles with a slab on top It's a way to preserve that That is it. We will close the public hearing subject to what happens in two weeks when we Looked at delivery, but anybody else has asked for more information Great Great. Thank you. Thank you Should I sign in here that I missed that too? Please. Please. Thank you Thank you enough for coming in. Thank you So we have a Meeting Sketch plan for 253 south union street There's one member of the public. I'm not sure if that's the applicant or not Yeah Oh, perfect Ah, so we have uh somebody here So Because and can you introduce yourself? We just see gba conference This is sketch plan, which is somewhat informal It's it's ready for us to hear something about what you're trying to do And for us to be able to give you some feedback on it. So if you want to Walk through the the plans that would be great In short, and this is this is very preliminary of course if we're keeping a sketch plan but uh, we are looking at Right now this building is a law office. We're used is still in the law office And we are looking to convert it back into residential Uh, it's quite a large you see there is before and she's trying to do zoning tips here So to the let's say to the that's the delineation point between medium density or density residential So we when you see it says 940 square feet addition there that would Be similar in size and nature to the existing store building And through the review between those two buildings, but this is the front of the building We see no changes to this we just uh, it's just the deck up of the that storage area Remove that using Having us where the four windows are that is brick But it's only four inches of brick that can match the six human tissues panel, but be more of the ill That is just hold if you go to the next one. Do you want that one? We missing it I think he's looking five of seven Yeah, it's skips it. It skips right past it Huh, what if you we used to air purrs down where it says four of seven Do do you want to screen share Steve? Yeah, so I'm going to promote you to a panelist so you can screen share There you go. Are you there Steve? He's muted. There you go. You're muted Here, I'm unmuted. Okay You can go ahead and screen share now All right, does that work? We see it Great So this portion back here is what I was talking about that is the it was a clamored into a below the existing deck and this deck of the bits a bit It's good sprawling. There's a lot going on in the back of the back of the building here And so we're here hoping to remove this portion under here. Um, and again, this was built in the 80s The original building was built in 1848 and then at some point this L was at It's not part of the it's not part of the original and this is the same dust the L is ignored And so we're hoping to clean them and this is the parking spots on this easement for this driveway access And so we are intending to keep those six parking parking area here Make a little green back here for the easement I don't really have any information Other than this box. It's more just to see We just want to question. Um What are are the access to the units going to be Internal through central hallway or will each one have an access point externally? Oh This unit And then all the other units who would have access from that deck in the back And so there wouldn't be a central hallway back here and an entrance along this edge And so three of the units back here would be uh access via this deck and then the access Through this entryway and then one here. So I guess the answer is there's a mix What about the addition the the 940 square foot addition Yeah, so originally through this So I guess I want to comment a few things on circulation a little bit. Um, Sorry, I understand that the the Piece that's in the rm district is there because that's where the rm district is But it's sort of a disappointing mass Stuck in the middle of a narrow piece of land Where you've got all this land in front. So the whole Project is Disproportional in terms of its use of green space And building proportion and it would be nice if that could be better managed I understand that it's easy to just do it like that. Maybe that's all that you're trying to do right now Um, and I just so then the other one of the other things is the Flow From the building in the back to the sidewalk in front That it seems like it would be good to have a clear path So that people can walk out that door and get to the sidewalk right now. It sounds like You're walking around the building or I'm not really sure how one's supposed to do it It's not going to clear those parking spaces sound like you're going to be entering the You're going to have to go around the building to get into the building from those Four or five parking spaces you have access from the adjacent property Yeah, well, they're really great now this driveway the building is right up against the driveway So really we're hoping to make this an access point through here and then up to the sidewalk So I'll definitely show that here That's a that's a great comment And apart the parking from the neighboring site. Is that accessing your units? And so you'll have to have some sort of pathway for that too Right and that's where this starts to seem like we could have a nice walkway down here to tie all this together Yeah, I think it's the RM district piece that's thrown in there that sort of Makes everything you're doing on the front piece somewhat questionable because that piece seems not to work and You know, so anyways, if you're really going to be doing that in the future, you may want to rethink some of the Landscaping and courtyard sense of the first phase Any of the comments from the board here on on this I will say it's a building walked by a lot and I love it. It's a it's a gorgeous building. Um, It's nice to see it maintained You know and used comments here This is something was worth without eda accessibility In the staff comments Have you have you looked into that at all? About accessibility. Yeah Yeah, so this new the new It's nearly impossible to make the existing building accessible So we are going to have accessible units in the benediction So now to determine where some of your handicap parking spaces go You got it. Yeah And it'll also be locating probably some HVAC units on the ground maybe somewhere. So that'll be Yeah, so we're talking about air source heat pumps and so We want to keep these as minimal as possible and so rather than group them all together And we showed this all to be here on our permit application Like to group those separately so they don't become one big You know in here for equipment, let's look at the ground You think they won't be They wouldn't And Oh, they wouldn't they would be and the buildings are the additions are flat roof buildings Is that what i'm saying? Yes, and this this gallery here is already a flat roof building And uh, and you can on the third floor here Currently there's a sliding door you can walk out under this room But this building will match that it'll be the same height as the existing Existing and as you well know it doesn't really need to Be the same material it could be You have a little more freedom I'm gonna look at Some cement board panels. Maybe it's a more interesting Sort of arrangement of materials, but it definitely don't want it to try to overshadow the beauty of the front piece Well, it's sort of going to be hidden from the front piece Yeah Yeah, I mean you'll you'll see it when you're walking south on the sidewalk. Yeah But I mean you have to look you have to look yeah Most people aren't going to get past the beautiful person Well, I've always wondered about those extra posts on the porch It looks like it's really odd. Yeah I think they must I don't something must have been failing to decide that they haven't had to add more posts. I don't know Yeah, these these guys. Yeah, those two Yeah I'd like to look at Getting rid of them Getting it back to what it was Definitely a nice facade. Any any other questions on the board here? No Well, it looks like a nice project And it needs a lot of development. This is really just We're gonna make sure we learn heading down the wrong path, that's all Yeah, good I think that's it. We'll look forward to seeing it another time Great. Thank you very much for your time. I appreciate it Nice We have one other item on our agenda, which is the meeting schedule How come there aren't any Wednesday meetings? Is that just the quirk of the year? If there were any alterations Celeste has Changed the meetings and I don't think we found any did we? Um, g re let me open it. Um I think there was One Celeste has created the schedule There was just the shift in the week. Do you like Wednesday meeting time meeting for dr B was just the town meeting always switch from the first to the eighth. Yeah, that was the only adjustment for dr B Next year just on tuesdays Because it's a five week month exciting By the way, this is a five week month So Our next hearing is not until december 7th. It will not be in two weeks. It'll be in three weeks. Thank you for the On top of the calendar to mary good Okay, so we have to approve this Can I have a motion to uh approve the review board meeting schedule? Jeff second second Brooks any discussion All in favor All right. Hi unanimous all right Okay, and um We're gonna close the public hearing So we come with our public hearing and we at least discuss the deliberative process On december 7th Well, that's what I wanted. Yeah, when are we going to deliver? Is there any implication of needing to Reworn if there were issues with the meeting? No notice was appropriate We don't need to re-worn it if we just Decide not to deliberate and Wait Right, we're essentially running the risk that somebody's going to come forward and say they wanted to be heard Right weren't able to Which is probably Not a very big risk, but a risk nonetheless. Don't we I think we need to make some sort of Motion on the mod be on colchester app because that expires at the end of november. No Wasn't it in november? They have come before you in adequate time So they've been they've been brought it has been brought for proper review So we don't need to take action on that by the end of november and our 45 day starts from tonight You have 45 days The last before I done Um, I didn't recognize voices. Could you tell me who motioned in second the calendar a j Motioned and Brooks second. Thank you. Jeff Jeff. Oh, okay. Jeff mention. There we go. Yeah I mean the issues tonight weren't very controversial. No, I mean I mean of all the meetings I would feel comfortable running the risk. This would probably be the one But I hate to think that there may be somebody out there that Has an issue What's the consensus here from the board in terms of Celebrating or waiting for december zone I It doesn't feel like there's any time constraints on any of these like the sign Is already up We're just deciding if that's okay Uh, I don't know nothing felt Super time constrained. That would be the only thing that would make me want to Try to make some decisions. So yeah, I I'm in favor of waiting And then the next Question would be if we're waiting our next meeting is december 7th December 7th We could yeah, I just wait until that. I mean there's only two items and I just wait So the question is do we deliberate these items at the end of that meeting is that AJ you weren't here. You weren't here at the beginning the consent agenda item came off and as a public was a public meeting I saw that I saw that I was there for that So we have three items, yeah I say we just wait to deliver it at the end. Yes, okay Then we will do that. We're going to celebrate the end of the december 7th We don't need to make a motion to do that, right? You can set your deliberative agenda Sorry, I didn't realize that we decided I think that you know, we're in agreement We're probably not going to get somebody coming forward if we deliberate now. It's all fresh in our minds Of course, you know, I think we just don't vote and then it would make the voting easier next time maybe or Maybe you're not gonna like expression your mind isn't really we've had we've had Meetings in the past where we've waited to deliver it. It hasn't been a problem. Most everybody knows What we're going to do? Yeah, and if anyone were to submit anything else Okay, we have to reopen here to accept it and then Okay, it's good. Sorry Sorry about that All right, okay. Are you adjourned? We are we're adjourned We're adjourned Recording stopped Thank you everyone Okay, you guys thank you for making an exciting merry uh meeting there guys


Congratulations, you went somewhere you weren't supposed to go, saw something you weren't supposed to see, and prevented a tidy resolution to a messy problem. Needless to say, you're fired. But before you go, take this certificate of insanity. We're giving it to you to ensure that no one believes you, and to ensure that we can promptly replace you without incident. There is a truck waiting for you outside. Take care.


Hello everyone, I welcome you in the first live stream and as far as I can see we have five people here. So I'm ready to answer any questions about the virtual linguistics compass, about linguistics online, we've got classes, well and even about robots, so any questions, I can't see anything in the chat, but maybe questions are going to come up pretty soon. Well, if you're interested, let me say something about the virtual linguistics compass. The whole thing was started in the 1990s, believe it or not, before we produced the website which originally was called linguistics-online.com. Before we started that, we produced CD-ROMs, maybe some of you still know what CD-ROMs are, CD-ROMs with linguistic information. They were pretty popular, we had a course called Introduction to Linguistics in English and in German. On separate CDs we had a course with Muton de Groyter, Interactive Introduction to Phonetic and Phonology, and later we produced the CD for William LaBos Atlas of North American English and for the Big Varieties of English Project with Ben Courtman and Edgar Schneider. From these CDs and the knowledge we gained through these CDs, we generated more and more linguistic content, and as early as 2001, we started the virtual linguistics compass and first of all transferred the components we had created for the CDs to the newly founded virtual linguistics compass and our initial idea was to produce online classes as many as possible. Let me look at the chat. Hi, welcome to you all. Any questions? So that was how the whole project started. And the first course we produced, the first true course started in 2003 and it was the course History of English. The reason for such a course, which was a true online course, was simple. A colleague of mine went into pension and we didn't have anyone else who could teach that class except ourselves but I didn't like the idea of teaching such a sort of static knowledge. Not many things are changing in the historical development of English, maybe only the linguistic insight about it and so we produced the course online and the success was enormous. Now, in about 2004, we had material to produce more courses and the next one we started was an introduction to linguistics class and then of course phonetics and phonology because honestly, I can't see anyone teaching phonetics with full sound support from several languages these days. There is live in class. You need technical support in order to produce sounds in Arabic, click sounds and all sorts of realizations of phonemes, multimedia is much better than what we can do in class. So that was in 2004 or 2005, we had three courses, a phonetics course and a introductory course and we had the History of English course. And these courses were modified and became better and better and then after a certain time around 2008, we asked ourselves, what shall we do in class with so much material now on our online platform? What can we do in class? Are we still delivering content? Well, the idea was possibly not. Why should we deliver content if it's there digitally?   It's all there. It's on the web. So why not? And so the idea was to develop a new teaching learning concept and this teaching learning concept for which we were awarded many prizes here over here in Germany is called the inverted classroom concept. So the inverted classroom concept simply says content delivery is digital, content acquisition is self-guided and that's always the first step. And after that, we meet in class to discuss things. Let me illustrate this on the basis of the topic, let's say the phoneme. Everything about the phoneme, the physical view, the functional view, what are minimal pairs, Troubert's course approach, Daniel Jones' approach, even the Quaternay's approach about the psychological view of the phoneme. All that is done digitally. Students go through a digital learning unit. Today we call it topic. Now, once you've done that, it doesn't make sense to repeat that all in class. For what reason? It's a waste of time. If it's there digitally, you don't have to do it in class. So what did we do? We first of all thought, well, we could give some presentations about different topics. We could solve problems. Well, our first approach in around 2008, 9, 10 was simply was criticized by the students because we overburdened them with too much work. A year later, again, with our three courses, Introduction to Linguistics, Phonetics, Phonology, History of English, we did not introduce new topics. We simply repeated what we offered online. Students' evaluations were bad. We were criticized heavily and we were criticized heavily because the repetition of something which is there digitally is that waste of time. So what did we do? We developed what today is known as suggestions for in-class activities, questions, questions feeds, competence training and so on. And so that is today the basis of our learning units. If you enroll to any course on the Virtual Linguistics Campus, enrollment is free, registration is free, I will say something about it in a second. Then you see the idea that each learning unit, first of all, is introduced by a sort of guideline which contains our guiding questions called how to proceed. And it is finished with a suggestion for in-class activities. And that's the concept, the inverted classroom, digital content delivery, self-guided content acquisition and in-class, subsequent in-class training using data, using the Internet, of course. So whenever you go into class with me here on campus, you would have to use your smartphones or your computers in class. And we do research, we investigate, we analyze data and so on. Before I say something about the Virtual Linguistics Campus, let me comment on what Sarah Issa has just posted into the chat. Could you please give lessons about Lambda Calculus? I believe the few videos on YouTube regarding Lambda Calculus are clear enough for us as students. Well, I could do that, but we found out that the videos we have produced on more general topics in linguistics are far more popular. So if we serve students with specialized topics, then we have to have specialized courses because all our videos are linked up with the courses we offer via the Virtual Linguistics Campus. We have two videos on predicate logic and two videos on propositional logic. So they go into logics and meaning and the representation of meaning. Maybe, Sarah, you look at them first and you see what you can do with them. But of course, Lambda Calculus itself is a topic which is a little bit too specialized in order to become a single part of our efforts. So first of all, I would postpone that perhaps. Okay, we welcome a few users here from the Philippines and okay, that's it. But now let me say something about the Virtual Linguistics Campus. I don't know whether you have created your account on that international open educational resource platform which offers content on almost every area in linguistics. The Virtual Linguistics Campus Internet address is easy to find. Just type in into Google Virtual Linguistics Campus and you find everything you need. First of all is an open educational resource platform. That is everything we produce, text, images, videos, animations, whatever. All these things can be reused without asking for copyright regulations. All you have to do is quote that the content comes from the Virtual Linguistics Campus. That's it. Well, and then that's the first thing to make content, linguistic content available to the world. I personally can't see why linguists introduce topics like consonants or vowels in class. If you have the option to listen, to see animations, to do all sorts of things with that stuff digitally. So that's available to you first of all. For this reason, registration on the VLC, as we call it, is free. Secondly, the courses which are offered on the Virtual Linguistics Campus are also free. They are open and there's no restriction as far as the numbers of participants is concerned. And there are no fees whatsoever, but the courses are fully certified. They are certified, not in terms of credit points, because credit points first of all are internationally a little bit different. And secondly, only universities themselves can certify things. So what we do is in our certificates, you will be given specific type of information about the workload, the workload in hours. So that's the next thing. Certificate in terms of workload. And all our courses involve a workload of roughly 90 hours to 120 hours workload. So they're much more complex than the ordinary short internet courses, which rarely are more complex than let's say two weeks or so. Two weeks and four hours per week. These are real courses which you could deliver on campus. The courses we offer, well, it's the full undergraduate program in linguistics, introduction to linguistics, speech science, that's a course in phonetics. What else have we got? The nature of meaning, course on semantics and pragmatics, words and word structure, our course on morphology. Then the course, the structure of English, a course on English grammar. In the history of English, historical linguistics, psycho linguistics. Currently we are planning a revision class for exam students. And what else do we have? Well, then of course our big fieldwork classes currently available, Welsh and Japanese. We're working on Arabic linguistic fieldwork exploratory courses online. That's unique in the world of online linguistics. No one else has got such a thing where you can explore language by applying linguistic methodology without knowing the language, without even understanding the native speaker. That is possible and that's new. So we invite you to register to become part of the virtual linguistics campus community, which has a long tradition, as I said at the beginning, more than 20 years now. Full experience of a full linguistic background. To say something about my background. Well, I'm as a linguistic person at the university. I'm now retired. I was retired last year, but I still work on robot projects, working with humanoid robots. I spent three years in the United Kingdom and half a year in the United States. My teachers, my teachers were David Crystal in England, Mike Garmin in England. I had classes with Peter Roach and Trudgill. In Germany, my teacher was Eckhart Koenig. I was heavily influenced by a German politician called Klaus Knutzmann. And in America, I cooperated with William LaBeouf. So I learned a hell of a lot from these people and being there was simply wonderful. And when David Crystal returned to Germany in 2014, the first thing he did with me was a video on motivations about becoming a linguist. Do you find that video in our channel? Just look for it. It's a fantastic video. It shows the expertise of this man who I admire for his linguistic background and who I also admire for the way of teaching linguistics. And I hope that my way of doing things via video and also via the natural linguistics compass come close. They will never reach the expertise of David Crystal. So much I wanted to tell you. I can't see any further questions. So if you don't mind, we can say goodbye at this point unless there are any questions. Next time, perhaps in a month or so, let's see how many members our Facebook group has then currently we have more than 20,000. The virtual linguistics compass has almost 2,500 registered users and our YouTube channel, 88,000 subscribers. So if you want to help us, just advertise for our material and once more, it is free. The videos, for example, on the YouTube channel are all in the Creative Commons license, which means you can use them freely. You can show them in class. You can put them into your presentations or whatever you want to do. You can only show parts of them. Absolutely free. That's it. That's what I wanted to tell you. I will now leave this live stream and save it and put it into our channel and then other people can watch it too. So thanks for listening and thanks for being with me. Bye-bye.


Hello, and welcome to this presentation on ST's new Silicon Carbide Power MOSFET. Based on the advanced and innovative properties of wide band gap materials, ST Silicon Carbide, or SIC MOSFETs, feature very low RDS on-times area for the 1200 volt rating combined with excellent switching performance, translating into more efficient and compact designs. Applications include solar inverters, power supplies, HEVs, and electric vehicles and traction systems. The main features and benefits of ST's Silicon Carbide MOSFETs include the industry's highest temperature rating of 200 degrees Celsius for improved thermal design of power electronic systems, a very low on-state resistance over the entire temperature range for higher system efficiency, significantly reduced switching losses, also at high frequency, with minimal variation versus the temperature for more compact designs, a cost-effective simplified gate circuitry, and a very fast and robust intrinsic body diode for more compact systems. This figure compares the variation of on-state resistance as temperature increases. Not only does our device reach the industry's highest temperature rating of 200 degrees Celsius, but it also achieves the lowest on-state resistance among comparable competition devices. It also shows a very tight on-state resistance variation as the temperature rises. The following table compares our 1200 volt, 80-milli ohm SIC MOSFET with a trench gate field stop IGBT of the same voltage rating and equivalent on-state resistance. You can see that the SIC MOSFET exhibits significantly reduced switching losses, even at high temperatures. This enables designers to operate at very high switching frequencies, which is one of the main advantages of SIC MOSFET technology versus existing silicon IGBT technology. In addition, the variation of eon and eoff with temperature is very small. For example, the eoff of the SIC MOSFET increases by only 25 percent as the temperature rises from 25 degrees Celsius to 175 degrees Celsius, while the eoff of the IGBT increases by 90 percent. When tested in a continuous current mode 5 kilowatt boost converter application board at a switching frequency of 100 kilohertz, ST's SIC MOSFET solution provides the highest efficiency at full load, as shown here. The silicon IGBT-based solution reached its practical limit at 4 kilowatts, so it is not a viable solution. The efficiency of the 1200 volt SIC MOSFET is almost the same as for the IGBT, even at 4 times the switching frequency. In this slide, we can see that the SIC MOSFET-based board is switching at 100 kilohertz, while the IGBT-based board is switching at 25 kilohertz. By operating at a much higher switching frequency than the IGBT-based solution, the SIC MOSFET solution enables much smaller, lighter, and cost-effective designs. Such benefits have been demonstrated in a study conducted with an Italian coil maker. By using our SIC-based 5 kilowatt boost converter, they reduce the volume by 60 percent, the losses by 30 percent, the weight by 60 percent, and have cut the costs in half. Another advantage of SIC MOSFETs is that driving them is almost as easy as driving silicon MOSFETs and IGBTs. You just need a plus 20 volt gate drive to get the right on-state resistance and an adequate current capability to ensure high switching speed, 3 to 5 amps would be best. ST's TD350E driver, widely used for driving silicon IGBTs, is a good option when a buffer stage is required to obtain the proper current capability. Thanks for your attention. For further information, please visit www.st.com.sicmos.