Okay, so I'll give it a start Oh passcode Five three three seven five six at the passcode So mighty nine for nine But only if you join the zoom you can see it right here, right? I don't know if someone maybe can share it on the platform Okay, you're good Okay, then I'll kick it off with the automotive work group first of all, let's Take a short look on what we are aiming for so we want to see and discuss the conditions prerequisites whatever is needed in the automotive sector to target use cases there we Want to derive requirements from the use case and what it means to the kernel what it means to the development process of it We know there is the iso 2 6 2 6 2 which put high demands on the safety in the car and Yeah, and to start with we are very open for any use case Which could come up and the first use case which we took What the dashboard? Why have we selected the dashboard there are multiple reasons than there one is that it comes with A good explainable system So if we take the dashboard with warning signs warning signs are the gear indication warning signs are The check engine oil pressure whatever you can expect and they need to be there Displayed as safety information because if something is wrong with your car, you need to be informed Another thing which is happening is that in the past it were originally were light bulbs Then they turned into LEDs and the LEDs are now going into the display so you can see it's much more software driven than in the past But this gives you another reason to put it in because the next thing is someone may wants to start nice Blending around it wants to make it more pretty wants to have some animated whatever things in there to have the Telltale experience matching the whole car infrastructure The another thing which is nice of this is that it's not only software driven these days It's also that It has a good timing constraint So if you imagine the use case you're driving on the highway with a maximum speed suddenly a light bulb goes on So I because everybody of you will just hit the emergency brake check the manual and look what the light Means or maybe you just wait for some time to look for the next parking place or even go home Because the thing well my car will not die. It feels just driving normal But I know should know about it this gives you more relaxed timing constraint than hard real-time demands The last benefit which we have in with this use case is that there is already a demo Implementation of it available which was created by the automotive grade Linux. They mentioned us as a partner project and Typically also referred to us if it comes to the questions and their instrument cluster use case working groups and so on the latest release Which a GL did I guess is called There was one last octopus I guess and We are still a needlefish the main reason why we are a needlefish is that it's our demos QT based with the latest license changes of Q People moved on and say well It's not so commercially attractive for automotive anymore for some members at least and by this the main track is now going to flutter There's a new rendering framework, but the lower layers Where we are looking in into the kernel into the graphic subsystem. It's basically independent from this upper layer So and what we did as extension with these meter Eliza Layer, which we put to the york to tools is that we add this little Danger sign, which you can see there In real systems, you would not put this danger sign so this danger sign is for you illustrating that we are in the system that we hook on do some modifications and This illustrate this just we detected the fault This is danger and then we would reboot trigger watchdog or whatever and go into a safe state All right You will find a lot of these Instructions in the meter Eliza on the github repo. So just go on github.com a leader tech meter Eliza Slides will be uploaded as mentioned. So for this, there's no need to click on it now It provides a longer description on it how to use it and it gets combined with a work group automotive We did this because we had people hopping on and off the discussion the work groups And we discussed it again and just again how things look like and well documentation is very important It's not only important for safety It's also important for open source and principle and you want to make life easy for people to hook on so we started with this description We moved on a little bit on this we figured out that while some people may use open-soothed tumbleweed rather than many others using maybe Fedora Linux or Go also for you going to use so by this we saw there are differences Next thing what we did was setting up a docker container so that you have a docker file Then some people were didn't want to run the docker file to create the image So we were providing the image and we were growing this step-by-step And from time to time there are always people who want to start from scratch again So they just follow the instructions Currently we have a new joining in the group is said. Oh, yeah, I know there is this docker file I know everything is available, but I want to read the instructions again And actually I found already two broken links because your project just updated things and that's where we Want to have something continuously running so that things really work whenever you join in and for this We also set up a continuous integration. We did this together with the tools investigation and code improvement work group We have a git lab runner. You may wonder why source code is on github while the CI runs in git lab It was a little better for the user handling and the forking of it if you use the github actions you couldn't fork repositories and you can You need much more Configuration and can have some pitfalls if you don't do it right people may have access to your servers And we have a server underneath and this is better maintainable with GitLab and here it's actually in this way that when someone joins The group and is listed in the git lab. This person can actively It just trigger a pull request in github on a local branch on a fork Refer this in the git lab CI and do a run So it could be if you want to save computation performance if you don't have a disk space or whatever So these kind of things you can do with the CI It's not only building it's also checking that the system boots because if it would just build you don't know if things work out of the box and When it's built we also do a QAM a boot and share later on The rendered image so you can see that it really goes into rendering. It's not the one with the danger sign Which I took a screenshot From but there's all the danger sign in there. However what we figured out it's not always the build Which costs the issue it could be just recently that the cooks are can stack which we are using had The client and server certificates expired. So 7th of April We suddenly saw our CI failing when like what has gone wrong. So we were looking all the sources We couldn't find the sources Changes in there. We saw there was something on master but the master was not changed by us or we were not pulling it and Well, you could argue if we would have put it directly to a GL It may have been seen easier But we're not yet there that we say we are as stable that we would like to provide our Modifications to a GL what we did instead also then for the analysis We have an open qa setup running hosted by code thing on their servers And what you can see with this orange line in there You can basically move it from left to right It's from gnome testing and so on where we do a qa more emulation Reboot the system and you can move the slider to see an expected and the real rendered also So you do basically a initial run you take check the timings and then you can just see that the danger is in there And for the broken part You could see that there was just the danger in the reference but no longer in our rendering part All right, and then next to it you have the full information You also get a video recording of the testing phase in the logs You have the serial outputs you could we could see okay our signal source control at which we have there as a mock This was still operating. We could see how at the boot go on. Is there any version change and so on? so this is from the testing part and Then further we go for Pipeline flow so what we had in here is that we said From a development perspective We start with a meter Eliza Within the meter Eliza. There are the bit bake recipes the bispe recipes Can point to everything you can even add also component if you want to go there and then This meter Eliza is taken from the Docker file So it's very third in the Docker file we generate the docker image from it and this generated docker image Which would you download so either you download your meter Eliza you download a docker file Which pulls the meter Eliza or you download the pre-made docker image and we generate this on a regular base So we do it more or less once a week that we build from scratch and every night We just do a diff or using an ass state build and then also this docker image is the base for the GitLab CI which means the GitLab basically is Acting like the user so if you're using the system also GitLab is using it whenever something would broke in the docker image Or in the docker file or in meter Eliza the CI will show it So there's really a dependency flow in there to the documentation around and then later on The GitLab of course builds the QEMO image the QEMO image as built and downloadable for someone Is there to then go into the open QA so the open QA grabs it does the testing What is missing currently as a link back is that the open QA is not reporting back to the GitLab So if the GitLab CI is running It does not really do the check it could say well our CI passes Because from their this perspective the booting work there is an image generated You need to check manually while we have this little intermediate step and therefore now Another part is there that we also work on as bomb generation So we are just switching it on we figured out that some Function were not there so we were giving it back to AGL and then was not an AGL topic It was more the Yocto project topic. So They discussed it there and added some feature did some back porting For us because we're not on latest Yocto version And so this is just getting enabled Additionally also we as mentioned we have CS state So that we have cache point reason there if you would do a normal build He takes you 100 gigabyte or something like this. This will not be there, right? Yeah, so As already mentioned partially this gives you various starting points which are all interconnected and For me personally the most fancy one is that you can really just change two lines pointing to a new GitHub branch and Just let the whole flow go through that the things compile get the queue open QA run Without even the need that you don't things locally and this is very helpful because When someone contributes a new feature in GitHub or a new bug fix whatever gets in We can just simply point to this PR Let the testing be done and make a comment in the GitHub will request that the checks worked out up to the test cases we are doing and But this nobody has to manually check it. It's basically two lines changes We could most likely also automate some part there, but we haven't done this yet Right I guess I have One picture here, so let me just shortly see if I can start this So you just see it in operation Was pretty fast, I guess we still have the time for it Let's try to run it from within the presentation, but it never works as you like to So the right screen So what you can basically see is we open the terminal to Start the QM or image so the instrument cluster is booting just normal and then You can see that we have the terminal window so Here we log in and Start our signal source control app the signal source control app is a mock Which has different options so you can see you can interrupt the next message you can Hook or blocks a system and by this is for us a checking interface. This is just the visual part There's just a command line interface which is run in our testing You would not need to do so, but the open QA test for example this does the check also via the control app and The original pros wire name pipe, but it's hard to interact with it So we just have a little bit of graphics command line interface for it So if we run like this now something was not rendered properly anymore you see the danger sign propping up and The watchdog gets triggered and soon we should see that the things reboots the rest of the system You could see was still operating but there was some corrupt messages, so we just start the system up and similarly Guess we do another run and then there should be the danger sign detected So we do have one question in the chat. Oh, cool. Nice Well, we had two and I just went and answered one of them, but okay Then I'll just so What is QMU me relating for this example? Would what would the equivalent be on an automotive target? Yeah The QMU basically represents the standard AGL system and We took this QMU because it's an easy access. It's not something which would go into the real system later on so we basically Yeah, just need an easy starting point for people to do something and this is a good question because if you would do the full Analyst of your system, you will see most likely different slightly different interfaces because it's an x86 architecture rather than arm architecture, which is heavily used in automotive. So We just the this is a demo. This is a startup This is good for checking things, but it's not as good as you would go with the real hardware setup and Yeah, the equivalent automotive target on this would be you would take some hardware set up We were looking with reference hardware from AGL We have for the systems work group later and I will talk about the Xilinx example One said it was a Xen Which we also now look into maybe the automotive work group We were discussing also options like an orange pie which gives you arm hardware But still if you go to automotive and come up with the raspberry pie an orange pie rock pie Whatever you take they just say well, that's hobbyist hardware if you suddenly pick up something like ST micro NXP Qualcomm Samsung renaissance if you take this kind of hardware if it's more or less a similar thing, right? Just was a not as good BSP support Maybe like the community of suddenly it becomes attractive and this is what we want to bring in there and also find a hardware later On which is not only going for instrument cluster use case, but for telematics artists and so on so this would be the upcoming part Right the S-bomb was all to the second question where does the S-bomb come into play So the S-bomb will be in the built phase So we will try we will build the whole system it grabs all the information Which is in there for your to we know that it will not be complete and 100% correct because it can just be as correct As the data which is provided So if there are any issues and in the certain component if there is dual licensing multiple licensing this way not be perfect and As this is is the docker image stage or before basically it's Not taking the docker image as such, but it's going Afterwards it's going in the build the docker image is there to enable our build to do the octa build and the SPD x generation As bomb generation is in the octa build if we talk about the systems work group later on There we need to see how we combine this because we were most like not only have the octa build We also have the bass Western there and the xan build We may go everything into your clothes that we have just one bill to about the multiple would also be there And then it's inside the docker, but not the S-bomb for the docker image Container will be an interesting topic also on top later on good Got this is a main answer for the question. Let me get back to my slides All right, we already touched the STPA a little bit by Kate in the session before What I really like about this STPA thing is it's I get asked is it a replacement for something do I need to do this things I Make my way around with the answer and they will that's something which is the where Available it's quite new and a lot of the other techniques are coming from the 70s and 80s and haven't evolved too much And this gives you an additional view and if we're talking about safety and it can add value to your safety analysis Why not using it and here as mentioned this? Interaction with complex system it really helps you to just understand and we have pre-existing software, which is also not Typical in the automotive safety world, but here you can really look into a system model the things you already know and get this as a support So for our example, we started with a fairly simple drawing with this delta requester can signal and so on We took it to a next level where more interactions were in there Well, it goes through all these parts here and Just they what we learned for example about this phase was There are examples of save rendering engines. So there was some I guess some cute Library which was aimed and got an easel. I guess even a ZLD qualification But it turned out it if I read it correctly that it's mainly a tool qualification And anyway, it's a good thing to sell and it will definitely improve the quality of the component because it's developed according to it But whatever goes in there in the forward path basically need to be checked until the display and all the mechanisms which you're doing are pointless If you make to make sure that things are in there So you cannot make everything safe in this forward part You will always have a backward checking element in there which guarantees it could be In the display comparison go on audience question What you mentioned things like a soul and other things like that and I was just concerned that the audience may not know What those things are? Oh, yeah, so the easel is the automotive safety integrity level which ranging from Qm quality managed up to Azel D. I guess I just lost the mic could be Okay, good. I don't hear myself anymore. So it was just good. Perfect. I couldn't hear myself anymore. So there was just confused so The easel D would be really something for autonomous driving very high level more more Messeds tools to be used Testing in-depth and so on while lower level easel A and B you could find for lower level of safety others functionality are breaking and so on Actually breaking as a higher one break easy. So the easel D this is one of the very crucial things but our rendering of the telltale's for example, it's just an easel B level and There if you're coming from aerospace basically just turn around there. I guess it's going with zero C Highest level and then it goes up to five where it's lowest level. So here higher letter means higher level of safety to be fulfilled All right. Yeah, and this is basically here The parts so and for our part for this display rendering You would do a check in the backward pass and need to make sure that whatever got rendered is properly rendered And here you would do the check so whatever mechanisms you do in the forward pass is nice But it's not the one which you need to do in the end because you need to make sure what there So and this caused a lot of discussion because we were saying what do we do? What do we do properly for forward backward and this gives to the original first slide? Basically, which Kate was showing Understand your system sufficiently and do the measures where you need to and you need to understand your Linux system that you put the mechanism that the right places and The next picture which I want to see about this control structure is not following STPA It's not an STPA diagram But we see these three different regions of it the one region this yellow part is basically The functioning part. It's the plane function which you do which you would like to do as good as possible and Then you want to make sure that what you have done is running properly. This is the Kind of orange little bit orange style color here You would do checks you make sure that you have a monitoring and whatever gets rendered is really properly rendered and the last part of it is this really dark orange one at the watchdog because This is a fundamental system part of our work this challenge response watchdog is Something which is very much known in automotive. It's also in other industries used and basically this watchdog Make sure it's clever enough Checking elements in there and for us it means if we don't have real time scheduling in the Linux kernel So there could potentially be something in a very very seldom case which caused something to stock Which caused delayed execution and here this watchdog would send continuously messages So it's outside of the Linux system It's external watchdog for now with the watchdog module and does this check and this is just the last safety case and If you do a proper system design, this would never be triggered. So it's intended not to be used It's just your final safety net that nobody will Buy and then we have a safe state We have all this discussed we started with a demo as I show how it all was set up So this first QM or demo was done more than a year back I guess almost two years back and then we start all this discussion to write down Demand design how does the system operate and now we're at a state again where we need to map the model and the implementation so we need to understand much more which subsystems are involved and Then also involve the workload tracing which will be the next session by sure and also have an improved Implementation why do we need to an improved implementation so far? We have mocked certain things so we are not doing for rendering check We concentrated on the fundament of the watchdog But not on the specific rendering mechanisms and if we want to do a workload tracing the workload should represent reality and Here we did from our analysis from the discussion figure out Oh, we mocked up a little bit too much if we really want to understand the workloads so What we see is We have now a CI we can easily modify. So whenever we improve this For a step-by-step whatever we do on this additions. We can check it properly and We need to improve the Information on how the components are involved.  This is this component. This is safety monitor. This is the tell-tale checking and so on so we update this We update the monitoring app as next step and this is the part needed to have the workload tracing Further outlook on things. We also want to do is to merge the automotive use case into the systems work group demo because Currently we are plain Linux system and whoever works with automotive will most likely ask where at the auto So where the RTOS? How do you handle these kind of things? Oh, I'm running in an SDV software defined vehicle environment I want to use containers I would like to have virtualization involved and for this we pick it up to see how does our analysis change When we involved this kind of system. We had the part about the QMO here comes a part that we We're discussing currently the exciting sue one or two. This came from the demo from Stefano shown last year during open source someone of America and We may then move forward maybe to a Zecria system which gives you also AI in their AI vision parts robotics So for wider use cases and not limiting us to an instrument cluster We still see a lot of room to trim down the kernel configuration Trim down the image size because it's based on the plane yok to pokey We may not need all the things example could be we have thrown out the Wi-Fi driver because we believe that we don't need The Wi-Fi was in the instrument cluster at least not for the initializes if someone comes up and finds a fancy feature Was it who knows and what we also make as a hypothesis and assumption We have workloads tracing for medical and we hope to see Similarities when we trace it to certain kernel parts kernel subsystems So that both things together will give us an idea which is really crucial Which is maybe more relevant to more use cases where we need to concentrate on first and get a high value for a lot of other industries and Yeah, we don't see it as a safety element out of contact whatever we do because we say Any safety element out of context always runs in an assumed context So our assumed context is a tell tale if we would Certify something or not we but a project would use it to certify based on this tell to use case It doesn't mean that you can do an other system out of it But maybe an other system will have Similar demands to the kernel similar check them there may be stronger real-time requirements But this need to be there Because in the end what would really burns down from this use cases checking a memory region against another memory region within a specified time and This is maybe also something which goes to the medical devices where you need to make sure that Whatever you said as glucose monitoring level goes forward in the proper things Yeah last part on this if you see this drawing I just took two examples You could have park distance control, which you know from your ultrasonic beeping part if you go there Or you can even end up with certain camera use cases and basically you see very similar things the We have another sensor rather than maybe the engine sends a signal to say check engine The beep sends the this the ultrasonic sensor sends a distance rather than showing it on the screens You have a speaker and for camera. It would be more image data which need to be processed And this gives you a scaling factor. It gives you a base all will require a watchdog mechanism and Yeah, so we hope that we can go further with more advanced use cases and also fulfill certain others requirements and by going with the hardware from Currently a QA motor or something like the exciting spot or Well, well, so basically look for something which gets a good community support which gets a good PSP supports It could be anything else as well Just which is available to others We may have something which also goes into telematics others and so on Right, do we have something more in the chat any questions from the audience? Yeah, there was a question the last is the S-bomb intended as an input into the docker image It could be an input for the duck image basically We would most likely see it as an artifact and see the changes of the artifact which goes in so there's not a direct demand for this because Yeah, the S-bomb of the docker image would be another question It could be a double ass bomb There's one for the build system and the alignment around it how we build this thing what is involved there our first S-bomb approach went more into The S-bomb of the system in use so there's a S-bomb of the device use not the tools which have been used to generate the image Which would anyway also need an S-bomb in the end if it's all still based and then you are with the S-bomb within the docker That's two parts of it


Well those who enjoy Bemidji's trail system may have to find an alternate route on the east side of the lake this coming summer. Lake Bemidji that is. The Minnesota DNR says the Paul Bunyan State Trail Bridge over the Mississippi River east of Lake Bemidji is scheduled to be closed for repairs July 9th through the end of August. The Parks and Trails Division of the Minnesota DNR will replace the deck railings and certain substructure elements on the bridge increasing its weight bearing capacity so emergency vehicles can travel on it in the future while repairs are made the trail will be closed at the bridge and the DNR says there is not a safe option for an alternate route. If you enjoyed this segment of Lakeland news please consider making a tax deductible contribution to Lakeland PBS.


Yw'n rangef am ysgrifennu i'r cyfnwys yw'r hyffordd hynny? Fy oedd yn rhoi'r ddweud, ond mae'n gweithio'r ddweud. Felly yw'r ddweud, ac mae'r ddweud yn ychydig ffaintig. Felly mae'n amser gen i ddweud i ddim yn gweithio'r ddweud, ac mae'n gweithio'r ddweud. Mae'n ddweud gennym yn dod yn ddechrau. Mae gennym i ddweud. Mae'n ddweud o'r ddweud. Mae'n ddweud o'r ddweud i'r ddweud. ac mae'n cael ei sicr ar y cwliaeth i'r holl sy'n mwyfath i bob rhan o weld yn ôl phasweol iawn, ond mae'n sgwrd ei wneud â'i cyffredinol.  Felly, all round, excellent star, but that's all it is. You mentioned character, obviously, taking the lead twice in the game. It looked probably for a little bit as though all it was maybe going to win like that, and of course Harry Pritchard off the bench and we find a way to win our important, is that? Yeah, and I'm so pleased he headed it. You know, I keep saying headings are dying out.  So I was screaming that he had to head it when he was in a great ball from Ants. We were right behind it, had to head it. I think he was thinking about chesting until I was screaming. That's the one bonus about having a crowd today. I think he might have chested it, that and volleyed it. So great header, but yeah, we went with something slightly different today. I wanted to play clarking because he didn't fix his nature and to get him forward at the great chip in the first half and also had a header at the back post, maybe should do better with. But Pritchard's been excellent for us as well. We know he's got a goal in him, Pritchard, and that was a nice little combo. But I thought there was some really big performances from today and this is what I will really look forward to watching about later tonight. Coming off the bench as we mentioned and scoring the winner, Harry Pritchard, while we've not got a massive squad in terms of movement, is that encouraging? Is it to see players that you can bring off the bench and you can't make any of that like that? Yeah, listen, we know we're going to ring with a tight squad. We'll bring a couple in to sort that out about that. But when you turn around and you get Clayton to come on, you know, Big Ben, who had a up to Christmas last year with the best defensive record in the league, you know, so. Zele, desperate to come on young Keirne. We've got Jaco's come back and showing up well since he's come back from his lawn. I've never seen him play Tyler French today. And everyone's screaming out that we need a right back because we let two go. Tyler's done really well this pre-season and deserved his chance today. So a lot of positives, as I said, but it's 100 per cent less. We're not getting carried away. We know that. There'll be bumps in the road. But it's a start we wanted and it was a start we deserved. And a good preparation, really, I guess, for Doncast to show it back out on Tuesday night. Is it a different type of game? Yeah, we knew our boat and we're going to play today. I would imagine we'll know Doncast is going to play on Tuesday. A different game, but we'll be ready for it. You know, we'll make changes. There's no doubt about that. The lads who were on Ventsadale play and some of the couple of young boys will start as well. But we're winning to have it. So you want to go to Doncast and put in a good performance and try to win the game. You know, we won't be going just because the side won't be the same as it is today. That doesn't mean I say we take it any lighter. We had a good game against them in pre-season. So we'll look forward to Tuesday now.


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we are going to discuss the following question and the question says that find the range of the values of x which satisfy the inequality minus 1 upon 3 is less than 2x upon 9 plus 1 is less than equal to 2 for x belonging to R the set of real numbers graph the solution set on the number line. Consider the inequality minus 1 upon 3 is less than 2x upon 9 plus 1 is less than equal to 2. Here the LCM of 3 and 9 is 9 therefore we multiply the whole inequality by 9. As we know if we multiply an inequality by the same positive real number it does not change the inequality so we get minus 1 by 3 into 9 is less than 2x upon 9 into 9 plus 1 into 9 is less than equal to 2 into 9 which implies minus 3 is less than 2x plus 9 is less than equal to 18. Now on separating the two inequalities we have minus 3 is less than 2x plus 9 and 2x plus 9 is less than equal to 18. First let us consider minus 3 is less than 2x plus 9 we know that on adding or subtracting any positive real number to an inequality does not change the inequality so we subtract 9 from both sides of the inequality we obtain minus 3 minus 9 is less than 2x plus 9 minus 9 which implies minus 12 is less than 2x which implies minus 12 upon 2 is less than 2x upon 2 which implies minus 6 is less than x mark this in equation as 1. Now consider 2x plus 9 is less than equal to 18 here again we subtract 9 from both sides of the inequality we get x plus 9 minus 9 is less than equal to 18 minus 9 which implies that 2x is less than equal to 9 which implies x is less than equal to 9 by 2 which is equal to 4.5 so we have x is less than equal to 4.5 mark this in equation as 2 now on combining in equations 1 and 2 we obtain minus 6 is less than x is less than equal to 4.5 now as x belongs to R the set of real numbers range of values of x is all real numbers lying between minus 6 is less than x is less than equal to 4.5 where 4.5 is included in the range and minus 6 is not included in the range as minus 6 is strictly less than x and x is less than equal to 4.5 now let us graph the solution set on the number line first of all draw a number line and mark values as 0, 1, 2, 3 and so on and minus 1, minus 2, minus 3 and so on on the number line at equal distances. As minus 6 is strictly less than x therefore mark minus 6 with an open dot which shows that minus 6 is not included in the range also x is less than equal to 4.5 therefore mark 4.5 with a closed dot which shows that 4.5 is included in the range now shape the number line between minus 6 and 4.5 the shaded portion shows the solution set of the given in equation which includes 4.5 but does not include minus 6. This completes our session hope you enjoyed this session.


From around the globe, it's theCUBE, covering Fortinet Security Summit. Brought to you by Fortinet. Welcome back to theCUBE. Lisa Martin here at the Fortinet Championship Security Summit. Napa Valley has been beautiful and gracious to us all day. We're very pleased to be here. I'm very pleased to welcome a first-timer to theCUBE, Rupesh Chakshi, VP AT&T Cybersecurity and Edge Solutions at AT&T Cybersecurity. Rupesh, welcome. Thank you. Thank you so much for having me, Lisa. I'm looking forward to our conversation today. Me too. First of all, we're in Napa. We're outdoors. It's a beautiful venue. No complaints, right? We're at a golf PGA tournament. Very exciting. Talk to me about the AT&T-Fortinet relationship. Give me a good insight into the partnership. Sure, sure. So as you said, you know, beautiful weather in California, Napa. It's my first time. So it's kind of a new experience for me. Going back to your question in terms of the relationship between AT&T and Fortinet, a long-lasting, you know, 10-plus years, you know, hand-in-hand in terms of the product, the technology, the capabilities that we have brought together in the security space for our customers. So a strategic relationship. And I'm so thrilled to be here today as Fortinet invited us to be part of the championship. Tom, talk to me. So your role, VP of AT&T Cybersecurity and Edge Solutions, give me a dive into what's in your purview. Sure, sure. So I sort of, you know, run the P&L or the profit and loss center for product management for all of AT&T, cybersecurity and Edge Solutions. And the whole concept behind putting the teams together is the convergence in networking and security.  And my team and I focus on bringing new product and capabilities to the marketplace, you know, working with our sales team from an enablement perspective, go-to-market strategy. And the whole idea is about, you know, winning in the marketplace, right? So delivering growth and revenue to the business. And competitive differentiation. Yes. So we've seen so much change in the last year and a half. I know that's an epic understatement, but we've also seen the proliferation at the Edge. Yes. What are some of the challenges that you're seeing and hearing from customers where that's concerned? Joe, as you stated, right? There's a lot happening in the Edge. And sometimes the definition for Edge varies when you talk with different people. The way we look at it is, you know, definitely focused on the customer edge, right? So if you think about many businesses, whether I'm a quick-serve restaurant or I'm a banking institute or a financial services or an insurance agency or I'm a retailer, et cetera. You know, lots of different branches, lots of different transformation taking place. So one way of approaching it is that when you think about the customer edge, you see a lot of virtualization, software-driven, a lot of IoT endpoints, et cetera, taking place. So the cyber landscape becomes more important. Now you're connecting users, devices, capabilities, your point of sale system to a, you know, multi-cloud environment and that, you know, encryption of that data, the speed at which it needs to happen, all of that is very important. And as we think ahead with the 5G and Edge compute and what that evolution revolution is going to bring, it's going to get even more excited because to me those are kind of like, you know, playgrounds of innovation, but we want to do it right and keep sort of, you know, cyber and security at the core of it so we can innovate and keep the businesses safe. How do you help customers to kind of navigate Edge cyber security challenges and them not being synonymous? That's a great, great question. You know, every day I see, you know, different teams, different agendas, different kind of ways of approaching things and what I tell customers and even my own teams is that, look, we have to have a blueprint, an architecture, a vision, you know, what are the business outcomes that we want to achieve, what the customer wants to achieve and then start to look at that kind of technology, kind of convergence that is taking place and especially in the security and the networking space, significant momentum on the convergence and utilize that convergence to create kind of full value stack solutions that can be scaled, can be delivered so you are not just one and done but it's a continuous innovation and improvement and in the security space you need that, right? It's never going to be one and done. No, I think we've seen so much change in the last year we've seen obviously this rapid pivot to work from home that was particularly overnight for millions and millions of people. We're still in that to a fair amount. There's a good amount of people that are still remote and that probably will be permanently. There's those that are going to be hybrid and a threat landscape has exploded. I was looking at and talking with Forty Guard Labs and the nearly 11X increase in the last 12 months in ransomware is insane and the ransomware as a business is exploded so security is a board level organization for businesses I assume in any industry. Absolutely, absolutely. I agree with you. It's a board level conversation. Security is not a technology problem. Not about picking a tool. It's about the business risk and what do we need to do? You mentioned a couple of interesting stats, right? So we've seen two things I'll share. One is we've seen 440 petabytes of data on the AT&T network in one average business day. So 440 petabytes of data. People don't know what a byte is. So you can imagine the amount of information. So you can imagine the amount of security apparatus that you need to protect and defend and provide the right kind of insights. And then the other thing that we have seen along the same lines of what you were mentioning is significant ransomware, but also significant DDoS attacks, right? So almost like we would say around 300% plus DDoS mitigations that we did from last year, year over year. So a lot of focus on protecting the customers, securing the endpoints, the applications, the data, the network, the devices, et cetera. The other two points that I wanna mention in this space, again, going back to all of this is happening, right? So you have to focus on this innovation at the speed of light. So artificial intelligence, machine learning, the software capabilities that are more forward-looking have to be applied in the security space ever more than ever before, right? That means do the... We're seeing alliances, right?  You see the national security agencies kind of leaning in and saying, hey, let's together build this concept of a digital trust because we're all gonna be doing business whether it's a public-to-public, public-to-private, private-to-private, all of those different entities have to work together. So having security in a digital trust is important. Do you think that the Biden administration's fairly recent executive order is driving the catalyst of that? Absolutely. And I give the president and the administration a lot of kudos for kind of taking it head-on and saying, look, as a nation, we need to take care of this. And I think the other acknowledgement that it is not just one team or one company or one agency, right? It's a whole ecosystem that has to come together, not just national at the global level because we live in a hyper-connected world, right? And one of the things that you mentioned before was like this hybrid work. And I was joking with somebody the other day that just in reality, the word is location, location, location, I think in network security and networking, the word is hybrid, hybrid, hybrid, because you got a hybrid workforce, a hybrid cloud, you have a hybrid, you have a hyper-connected enterprise. So we're going to be in this sort of, you know, hybrid work for quite some time. We are and it has to be secure and organized. You know, all the disruption of folks going to remote work and trying to get connected, one, be on video conferencing, kids are in school, spouse working, maybe kids are gaming. That's been, the connectivity alone has been a huge challenge. You know, Fortinet is doing a lot there with Linksys, especially to help that remote environment because we know a lot of it's going to remain. But in the spirit of transformation, you had a session today here at the Security Summit. You talked about transformation and transformation plan. We talk about that word at every event, digital transformation, right? Infrastructure, transformation, IT, security. What context were you talking about transformation in it today? What was the transformation plan mean for your customers? That's a great question because I sometimes feel, you know, overused term, right? Then you just take something and add it. It's IT transformation, network transformation, digital transformation. But what we were talking today in the morning was more around sort of, you know, again, going back to the network security and the transformation that the customers have to do. We hear a lot about SASE and the convergence we are seeing, you know, SDVAN take off significantly from an adoption perspective, application aware experiences, et cetera. Customers are looking at doing things like internet offload and having connectivity back into the SAS applications. Again, secure connectivity back into the SAS applications which directly ties to their outcomes. So the three tenants of my conversation today was, hey, make sure you have a clear view on the business outcomes that you want to accomplish. Now the second was work with a trusted advisor and AT&T in many cases is providing that from a trusted advisor perspective. And third is that going back to the one and done, it is not a one and done, right? This is a continuous process. So sometimes we have to be thinking about, are we doing it in a way that we will always be future ready? Will we always be, you know, able to deal with the security threats that we don't even know about today?  And you think, man, we really weren't future ready when the pandemic struck. There was so much that wasn't there. And when I was talking with Fortinet earlier, I said, you know, how much has the pandemic been a catalyst for so much innovation? I imagine it has been the same thing that you've seen. Absolutely.  What is it going to be? And the first thing was, hey, we're all going to work remote. Is it a one week? Is it a two week thing? Right? And then if you're like the CIO or the CISO or other folks, you're worried about, how am I going to give the productivity tools, right? Businesses in a one customer we worked with, again, to back to innovation was said, hey, I have 20,000 call center agents that I need to take remote. How do you deliver connectivity and security?  So I think, you know, it is accelerated what would happen over 10 years and 18 months. And it's still unknown, right? So we're still discovering the future. That's, there will be more silver linings to come, I think.  One of the things I noticed in your abstract of your session here was that according to Gartner, the convergence of network and security into the SASE framework is the most vigorous technology trend coming out of 2020. Are you seeing that? That's a big description, most vigorous.  And we are definitely seeing it, you know, we saw some of that in the second half of last year as the organizations were getting more organized to deal with the pandemic and the change. And coming into this year, it's even more accelerated. And what I mean by that is that, you know, I look at sort of, you know, three things, right? So one is going back to the hybrid work, remote work, work from anywhere, right? So how do you continue to deliver a differentiated experience, highly secure to that workforce? Because productivity, human capital, very important, right? The second is that there's a back and forth on the branch transformation.  So businesses are thinking about how do I do that branch transformation? And then the third is explosive business IoT. So the IoT endpoints, deeper into manufacturing, into airports, in many industries, we continue to see that. So when you think about Sassi and the framework, it's about delivering a framework that allows you to protect and secure all of those endpoints at scale. And I think that trend is real. I've seen customer demand. We've signed a number of deals, we're implementing them as we speak across all verticals, healthcare, retail, finance, manufacturing, transportation, government agencies, small businesses, mid-sized businesses. Nobody's exempt. Nope, nope. Not at all. Talk to me about, Kirst, you've been at AT&T a long time. You've seen a lot of innovation. Talk to me about your perspectives on seeing that and then what do you think is a silver lining that has come out of the acceleration of the last 18 months? So you know, I get the question, you know, I've been with AT&T a long time, right? And I still remember the day I joined AT&T Labs. So, you know, it was one of my kind of dream coming out of engineering school. Every engineer wants to go work for a brand that is recognized, right? And I drove from Clemson, South Carolina to New Jersey, Holmdel.  Yeah, you are. So I've, you know, think innovation is key and that's what we do at AT&T. I think the ability to kind of move fast, you know, I think what the pandemic has taught us is the speed, right? The speed at which we have to move, the speed at which we have to collaborate, the speed at which we have to deliver. So agility has become, you know, the differentiator for all of us and we're focusing on that. I also feel that, you know, there have been times where, you know, product organizations, technology organizations, you know, we struggle with jumping this sort of S-curve, right? Which is, hey, I'm holding on to something. Do I let go or not let go? And I think the pandemic has taught us that you have to jump the S-curve. You have to accelerate because that is where you need to be. And in a way, going back to the sassy trend, right? It is something that is real and it's going to be there for the next three to five years. So let's get ready. I call that getting comfortably uncomfortable. Yep. No business is safe if they rest on their laurels these days. Yep, absolutely. I think we've learned that. Speaking of speed, I want to, I want to get kind of your perspective on 5G where you guys are at. And when do you think it's going to be really impactful to, you know, businesses, consumers, first responders? The 5G investments are happening and they will continue to, you know, happen. And if you look at, you know, what's happened with the network, what AT&T has announced, you know, we've gotten a lot of kudos for our 5G network, for our mobile network, for our wireless network. And we are starting to see that innovation. And that innovation, as we anticipated, is happening for the enterprise customers first, right?  So we're seeing that, you know, momentum. I think on the consumer side, it is starting to come in and it's going to take a little bit more time as the devices and the applications catch up to what we are doing in the network. And if you think about, you know, the value creation that has happened on the mobile networks is like, if you think about companies like Uber or Lyft, right, did not exist. And many businesses, you know, are dependent on that network. And I think it will carry on and I think in the next year or two, we'll see firsthand the outcomes and the value that it is delivering. You go to a stadium, AT&T Stadium in Dallas, you know, 5G enabled, you know, the experience is very different. I can't wait to go to a stadium again and see if the mobile game or live music, I think that sounds great. Rupesh, thank you so much for joining me today, talking about what AT&T is doing with Fortinet, the challenges that you're helping your customers come out at the edge and the importance of really being future ready. Yes, thank you. Thank you so much. I really appreciate you having me. And thanks for Fortinet to invite us to be at this event. Isn't that nice? Yes, thank you, Fortinet. For Rupesh Takshi, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE at the Fortinet Championship Security Summit.


So it's called, in English, it's kiss, kiss, kiss. So the words in English are kiss, kiss, kiss, when daddy leaves to work, kiss, kiss, kiss, when mommy hugs me, kiss, kiss, kiss, when we meet each other, kiss, kiss, kiss, when we say goodbye. And it's actually, I believe, the theme song of a children's television show in Korea. So it's a very popular song that a lot of people, if they grew up there or lived there, would know. But it's Apaga Chudanete Po Po Po. So can we say that all together? Apaga Chudanete Po Po Po. Omaga Anajodo Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Bandbamyang Bangapwagal Po Po Inh devotional Bangapwagal Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Po Po po po po Yeah, so maybe let's try that one again. Hail. Can you do just the first part before the po-po-po's and then we'll pause and repeat that. Okay. My brain can't do a whole line at once. Sure. Sorry. Should we start again from the beginning? Yes. Okay. Apagachudanete. Apagachudanete. Po-po-po. Po-po-po. Po-po-po. Omaga anayodo. Po-po-po. Po-po-po. Omaga anayodo. Omaga anayodo. Po-po-po. Po-po-po. Manamyeong banggaptago po po po. Sorry. Manamyeong banggaptago po po po po po. Hailjil. Hailjil. Tanto manayo. Tanto manayo. Po po po. Po po po po. So maybe then I'll sing a line and then you can sing it with me because there's a bit of tune with it which is actually quite nice and you can also, I discovered, sing it in English. You just need to put the kiss, the po-po-po is kiss-kiss-kiss so you just need to put that in the end to make it work the same. So it goes... Hey, old you tend to manaya po-po-po. Hey, old you tend to manaya po-po-po. It's hard to do the tune when I'm not singing it all the way through for me so I think I... You might sing it all the way through. We'll listen. Help me out here please. So it's... Daddy got you done at the po-po-po. Oh my God, I know you're the po-po-po. By now I'm young, by now I'm a po-po-po. Hey, old you tend to manaya po-po-po.


So, if you're not on Twitter, a lot went down over the weekend. I didn't necessarily partake in the conversation, but in a nutshell, Jimmy Dore put pressure on AOC and other members of the squad to withhold their votes for Nancy Pelosi, deny her the speakership if she doesn't promise a floor vote on Medicare for All. Now, I didn't talk about this online, but I've been thinking deeply about this, and I have quite a bit to say. So let me give you some context in case you're not on Twitter. So Jimmy Dore tweeted out, progressives in Congress can actually force a Medicare for All vote if they withhold their vote for Pelosi as speaker to do it. I ask all progressives to pressure your favorite progressive congressperson to withhold their vote for Pelosi and demand a Medicare for All vote. Now what's interesting is that AOC actually responded to this pressure, but not directly to Jimmy Dore. She responded to Justin Jackson, who's an NFL player, who basically relayed Jimmy's message to her, and he says, if AOC and the squad don't do what Jimmy Dore has suggested and withhold their vote for Pelosi for speakership unless Medicare for All gets brought up to the floor for a vote, they will be revealing themselves. Power concedes nothing without a demand. AOC then responded, saying, problem with this idea is that there isn't enough thought given to step two. The Democratic votes aren't there yet. And with a razor-thin margin, the dem knows are greater than the margin. So you issue threats, hold your vote, and lose, then what? If you want to know who's opposed, look at the cosponsor list. In contrast, you can use leverage to push for things that can happen and change lives, i.e. a $15 an hour minimum wage vote in the first 100 days, which is doable, elevating longtime progressive champions to important positions of leadership, also doable, that's the opportunity cost to weigh. Justin Jackson then responded to that, saying, why aren't they there? The people of the party are there. It's not acceptable. Leadership isn't there. If they have no threat of not staying in leadership, what's the point? Pelosi was speaker for two years with no Medicare for All vote. What is your plan to force her to get a vote? AOC then responded, saying, why aren't they there is a real question. We watched the presidential debates and saw how many fiercely defend our for-profit insurance system, but know that the movement pressure, positive support, primaries, popularity, organizing, et cetera, is working. More cosponsors now than ever. Justin Jackson responded, saying, would love for Democrats to be on the record denying their constituents health care during a pandemic. Sounds like good politics for the progressive movement and our goals. AOC responded, saying, I respect that. And in an important way, they are on the record. There are 118 House Democrats who have publicly signed on to guaranteed health care during this term. They are listed here. Justin Jackson says that sounds like 118 House Democrats who can use their leverage to get a Medicare for All for a vote. It's unacceptable that a 118 coalition of Democrats who support Medicare for All cannot even get a vote, something to consider. So I like the way that Justin Jackson thinks, and I'm just going to put this out there into the ether. If he were to run for Congress with his name, recognition and celebrity status, he could get elected and do a lot of good. But let me just say this. I do hear people who are a little bit skeptical on the left about this plan because in the event of floor vote for Medicare for All actually does come up and it fails, could the Democratic Party establishment then use that as evidence, basically, that it's just not popular enough. And if Democrats don't support it, then we shouldn't have it. Yes, that's a possibility. But I think that we can use it more to our advantage than they can use it to their advantage. The failure to pass Medicare for All during a pandemic, that's better for us when we're playing politics than it is for them in actuality because when you have the support of the people behind you, I think that you need to use that to your advantage. Now for the leftists who don't think that this is a good idea because it will ultimately fail. So basically what this comes down to is political theater, right? That's the counterargument. And that's fine. I kind of see that argument, although I sighed more with Justin Jackson in this is good for us in terms of optics and getting them to go on the record denying their constituents healthcare during a pandemic. And even if it's the case that you don't necessarily agree with the strategy of getting a floor vote on Medicare for All, ultimately what Jimmy Dorr is doing is really important. He's getting them to not just roll over and die and accept that Nancy Pelosi will be the Speaker of the House. It is overwhelmingly likely that she will become the Speaker of the House again. But with that inevitability, understand that there are things that you can do. Use your leverage as a bloc that is growing in Congress to perhaps deny her Speaker of the House unless she gives you something, anything, fight. That's the main thing because ultimately we're all disappointed. Like individuals who helped these folks get elected, you're just not challenging leadership enough. You're not challenging leadership enough.  And I get it, right? There are these interpersonal relationships, there's pressure. And part of the reason why the left is losing is because they always get steam rolled by the establishment. I mean, look at what happened with the Negotiations for the Heroes Act. Primila Jayapal and Mark Pokan did actually fight Nancy Pelosi to include a paycheck replacement provision in the Heroes Act, but they got steamrolled and they just kind of were left hanging. Like even if you don't win this battle, be vocal and try to use this as evidence for the next fight to kind of set yourself up. Well, since we didn't get this, I want this this time. Like the problem with the left in Congress is that they just don't challenge leadership enough. Nancy Pelosi does not get the resistance that is deserved for someone as out of touch and corporatist as she is. And Kyle Collins, he made a really good point. He said, like, look at the way that the Tea Party put pressure on Republican leaders. You had two Republican leaders step down because, you know, the Tea Party was so uncompromising. And we just, we don't have that equivalent on the left because there's just, there's, I don't know if there's the block isn't big enough. So they don't feel confident. But you have to fight. Like you have to put these things out there. Like don't just accept that Nancy Pelosi will be the speaker. Now, if all you need is like 10 to 15 votes to deny Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House in that position again, do something to get her to bend to your will, get some more concessions. And behind the scenes, you know, maybe that's happening. AOC says that we are doing this in terms of, you know, committee appointments and whatnot. And that's fine. But the overall thing that I want, you know, leftist members of Congress to take away from this is that we need to see some life in you. We need to know that you're willing to fight because, I mean, for all the great things that they do, the good policies that they advocate for, they just don't challenge leadership enough. And them leadership, they're the problems. So if you don't fight them, you will never get the policies that you want, regardless of how many members of, you know, Congress we elect that are leftists. So I just want to see some fight. Like if you don't agree with Jimmy Dore's Medicare for All Demand and a floor vote on that, that's fine. But fight, show us some signs of life. And look, I actually do agree that the floor vote on Medicare for All is probably a really good thing to do. Just going forward, we had a campaign on this. We could show, you know, the constituents here when we primary corporate Democrats that they denied health care to their constituents. Now sure, if they know it's not going to pass, they could vote for it. And that kind of, that strategy could fail. But I mean, look, I just want them to fight. I want you to fight. No more calling Nancy Pelosi, Mama Bear. No more playing 40 chests in politics and actually show us that you're fighting. And, you know, the counter argument from AOC and members of the squad will be, well, you don't see it, but we are fighting. Behind the scenes, there's negotiations that are taking place that you're not privy to. And sure, we don't know what's happening behind closed doors. But after time and again, you keep losing and you're not getting any say in bills that are popular that Democrats vote on. Whenever Pelosi continues to reject you in favor of more centrist Democrats, that's evidence to me that whatever you're doing behind the scenes is not enough. So fight. Show some signs of life. Show us that you're there to put pressure on leadership and fight. And if you don't want to fight in this specific way and you don't agree with this particular strategy, do something else. Just challenge leadership. I don't think that is too big of an ask for a movement that got you in Congress. Challenge leadership. And that really is the biggest takeaway. I want them to challenge leadership. They don't do it enough. I don't want to hear you call Nancy Pelosi mama bear and appear on magazine photo shoots with her. I want to see you fight these individuals because Nancy Pelosi is an objectively terrible human being who is denying millions of Americans Medicare for all during a pandemic. And yes, it is the case that Mitch McConnell will vote it down. But Nancy Pelosi is complicit because she won't even allow a vote on it. So look, I really, I give credit to Jimmy Dore for this. He was actually trending on Twitter because of this campaign. And ultimately at the end of the day, we need to acknowledge that we are the bosses of politicians and it's not unreasonable for us to ask for more even for members of Congress that we respect. This isn't unreasonable. We're not being unreasonable. The individuals who deny Medicare for all to their constituents during a pandemic, they're the ones that are being unreasonable. So I'll leave that there. I think that expecting politicians to do better, even ones that we support, that's a good thing. And I'm never going to disagree that we shouldn't always ask for more because we should.


Oh that looks good. I love it guys. High five We are off to get our Christmas trade finally. Yes, it is at least when we're filming it is Christmas Eve, right boys We're gonna open open some boxes with all of you later. You better believe it 2020 running shoes are starting to arrive. It's good good times in the studio in 2020. Okay, here we go boys Just like that butter my bread Duffy rolls into house into house Don't tell mama I got the boys a little treat at ace hardware. Oh, there we go. Kit Kat. What'd you guys get? Okay, let's oh my Michael wants me to open it. Okay, Christmas treat. Oh, you lucky duck you lucky duck I think we'll do this one. All right Perfect, oh that looks good. I love it Okay, there's our little tree. Our house is not huge. So we're going with the we're going with a little guy Okay, Michael time to go. I just dropped the boys off at the house. We have not decorated yet They're gonna go down for some quiet time and naps. The tree is still up on the roof. So we'll get that off I'm headed in to yes the pool and the rec center and Gonna give it another go just see how it feels. So Yeah, I'll get you an update later on after the tree is decorated on how the knee feels Thank you for all the comments on yesterday's vlog. Oh, yeah, by the way, I've got the J bird earbuds in This is a completely side note. I think I'm gonna do a water test. That's right I'm just curious to see how water proof they actually are. So stay tuned I'll probably doing that in the next day or two. Oh, what a great day again. Merry Christmas. All right, let's go And we're back three hours later getting on the physical therapy right now I will get you the update on how the run went today the pool Lifting all that good stuff. All right physical therapy Get the Christmas tree Okay, you guys put it over by that stand Somebody grab it here Seth grab it here at the end grab it here at the end Go go go go. Yay. It does Michael. It does Michael Okay, can you guys stick it in the stand? Isn't it fun? Does it look good? It's smaller, but it's like it looks amazing, right? And they wanted to give us a tall one, but it was sparse the sparse It's just perfect. All right, Merry Christmas everyone. Look at that. The tree is decorated It's Christmas Eve in real time when I'm filming this and so bunch of boxes have arrived We're gonna open these up in one second first the run today Second day in a row. Okay, I'm gonna put it at a Three slash two on the pain scale for the knee for today's run six miles I think it was about 735 a mile for the average so six miles 10k And I went to the pool went to the gym Um, I did my PT here at the house And that's that. All right, and we'll wake up tomorrow and I'll try and run again one day at a time right now Does that sound good? So that's my update on the run today But first or but now let's open up some shoes and yes This it's quite a few shoes that have arrived and my hope is that yes I know Christmas came early for me this year with these shoes But what I'm really hoping is that you can get some value out of me Running in these shoes testing them out for all of you And then giving you my first impressions and full review in early 2020 So that is the game plan for all of these shoes Like a lot of people are really interested. They're wondering why I never did a full review of the asex glide ride So so many people are asking me Guess what? I'm gonna do a full review of the asex glide ride Even though I already talked about that shoe in the in my 2019 running shoes of the year Okay, so let it begin. We're now I won't run in these shoes. Well, I obviously have to be I have to be vigilant right of my knee Um, but in early 2020 the goal is to run in these shoes. So all right enough talking here Let's open them up and we got the we got the trusty knife here for those that don't know the story This knife is dull as a butter knife. Don't worry. It is not sharp at all and my buddy in high school It's an elk antler. He made this he made this knife for me Blake shout out to Blake So don't worry. It's dull as a butter knife. So here we go Uh-huh. Oh, oh, I almost forgot. Okay. All right. This is a fun box. All right So, uh, let's see. These are actually not for me. You better believe it. So, uh, another pair of Nike next percents. That's right. So these oh man. So guess what? Remember Remember the next percent giveaway for maybe two weeks ago These are going to be shipped out to the Philippines in a couple days from now So I forget the winner. Uh, what was his name? Anyway a gentleman in the Philippines won these So these are yours, buddy. They're going to be sent to you probably in two days from now I will get to the uh, to the p o to the mailbox to the post office and send these out to you Here, let's see what is is. Okay Uh-huh And again, we're we're just we're testing shoes. We're testing shoes. Okay Oh, yeah, you better believe it. Okay, you know this box Boom. Skechers in the house. There it is. Skechers in the house work. Oh, yeah There it is. Oh my goodness. So this will be a shoe that I test out for all of you in 2020 with a hyperburst midsole The speed speed six from Skechers. There it is. Oh, it's looking it's feeling real lightweight And that's even with a hold on. Let me pull this out. Oh my goodness Wow, okay, that feels incredibly lightweight. Okay, good work. Skechers. I can already tell this is going to be a fun shoe All right, we're going to put this away Okay, and the next shoe from Skechers. Oh, yeah the go run Ride eight there we go. So I ran in the seven last year loved it a lot. It did the job, you know I would say I would call this a good like, um Easy day shoe or just getting the miles in shoe go run ride eight. There it is very lightweight Okay, so here we go the next shoe also from Skechers. So this is the hold on This is my first trail shoe From Skechers. This is crazy. This is I mean, I never thought I'd be running in a Skechers trail shoe But here it is the speed trail Man Wow interest I'm looking at the the outsole for the first time. That's the first thing I look at On the bottom of a trail shoe just to see the lug depth interesting. Okay Very fascinating Skechers. All right, there it is. So this is this. This is the speed trail from Skechers I'm real quick. I know this is not a Skechers. I can tell you that right now. In fact, I'm pretty I'm pretty excited about this box. Okay, here we go next shoe from adidas butter my bread Butter my bread. There it is the adidas adi zero adios five. They'll look at that guy. Oh gray I'm a big fan of gray. So good work. Uh, we will put this through the paces So I ran in the adios four in early 2008 19 So I will put this through the paces in early 2020 for all of you As you know, many elite marathon runners Many they're either sponsored by adidas or Nike adidas or Nike So adidas has really I would say Put a good fight up against Nike because obviously Nike Has probably the most athletes in the elite fields of these marathon races But I'm excited to see adidas continue to give them Competition when it comes to running shoes at the elite level for marathon racing There it is the adidas adi zero adios five. Okay. What else is in here for shoe and the adidas adi zero RC two this is a shoe. I've never run in before the adidas adi zero RC two Oh, man. So that's an engine. It's like an orangish color. Very cool. So I've never run in the RC two lineup from adidas I'll be excited to again test this out for you all in early 2020. There it is Okay, one more one more one more box to go I actually already know what it is because I opened it a couple days ago I couldn't I couldn't wait and question of the day before we open the box How did you do on your Christmas or running hall? Did you get some new running shoes? Did you get some new running gear? What did you receive from hopefully some loved ones out there that know you're a runner and they're taking care of you So that is the question of the day. What did you get on Christmas that's connected to running? Maybe it's uh, maybe actually I think a great gift down the road that I would like to give to other runners is uh registration Like cover registration fees for other runners because registration fees cost a lot of money these days So I think that'd be a great Christmas gift for down the road someday. Okay. Here we go last shoe This is a shoe that um It's not really being labeled as a it's it's it's a jogger shoe. It's a jogger shoe Aka a dad shoe. Okay. So here we go the nike the nike Cruiser one the nike cruiser one There it is. Oh, yeah with that react phone through the midsole and it's it's being basically marketed as kind of a jogging shoe Aka kick around the house Let's go jog three to five miles. Have a good time relax kick back chill out a little bit I'm actually excited about this shoe the nike cruiser one there it is. So I love you all merry christmas once again Thanks for being here. Thanks for watching on christmas day when you get when you this is publishing on christmas day So all right onward and upward and uh, that's that I guess that's that All right, so we're gonna toss it back on the right to Last year's christmas celebration here at the demore household on the right And you know what I'll toss it back to a vlog from maybe three years ago A christmas celebration from three years ago at the demore household. All right, there you go. See beauty work hard And love each other. See you tomorrow


These were the four features that Rutherford put forward in his model. You can pause the video to go through each of them. Alright, the first, second and fourth feature holds very true, but the third feature was a little problematic. This one right here was a little problematic. It said that electrons revolve around the nucleus in circular paths. So let's have a look at an atom. Here is your nucleus. This right here is your nucleus. And this is an electron moving in circular path, revolving in circular path around the nucleus. Now any object that moves in a circular path experiences a force towards the center. In this case, you can see that the nucleus is always positively charged, electrons are negatively charged and unlike charges attract, right? So there will be a force towards the center which will be experienced by this electron. And if there is a force towards the center, there will be an acceleration towards the center. And that is also something that you will learn in physics in much more detail. That every object that is moving in a circular path, even if it is moving with the same speed is undergoing an acceleration. And why is that? Because they can say that acceleration is really change in velocity, right? Per unit time. Over here, the speed might not be changing but the direction is constantly changing, right? The direction in which the electron move, it constantly changes. So as a result of that, there must be some acceleration, right? Because there is change in velocity. Now why is it towards the center? Well, there is... We won't really go into that right now but you can say that because there is a force being experienced by the electron which is directed towards the center, there must also be an acceleration in that direction, right? The same is true for any system really which is undergoing a circular motion. Let's say if you have a ball tied to a string and you are making the ball go in circles. In this case, imagine what is the force that is experienced by the ball. Well, you're not holding the ball directly, right? You are holding it through a string. So the tension force in the string, that force is keeping the ball go in circles. And if there is a force towards the center, there will be an acceleration towards the center as well. Whenever there is a force, there is an acceleration. Again, if you're not familiar with that, you will learn more of that in physics. So now every object undergoing a circular motion has an acceleration towards the center and that acceleration is really called centripetal acceleration. The same is true for the electron moving in a circular path over here. Now if a charge is accelerating, accelerating charges, accelerating charges, they irradiate energy. They irradiate energy. And what form of energy can they radiate? Well, they can radiate energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation. For example, radio waves, microwaves and any kind of electromagnetic radiation. But if the electrons are constantly radiating or losing energy, then they must really lose their speed, right? They're losing energy. They can't keep on moving in a circular path around the nucleus because they are constantly losing, giving away energy. So they must really spiral. They must spiral like this, spiral like this and then strike at the nucleus. Well, that will make the nucleus highly unstable. So how does an atom exist at all? This was the biggest drawback of the Rutherford model, which his model couldn't really explain that. And later on, the scientist, Niels Bohr, he came up with a new model, a new structure of an atom, which explained how electrons can move, how electrons can revolve around the nucleus.


Thanks, Aaron. I don't really know if I can do that this time. This this was screwed up That's a hot mug guys. Hey guys, this is my review for Tokyo Gore police. This film was suggested to me by a friend of mine He's helped me out with a few of my videos in the past So I thought I would review one of the ones that he suggested and I Really regret the last two hours. This is by far one of the weirdest movies.  This is one of the tamest parts of the movie The film follows this main character who's part of this super secret very high-tech kind of weird industrial sort of police That goes after these people called engineers that are essentially mutant like human beings that can more Weird creatures out of themselves and gore and blood and shit and everywhere And there's some sort of conspiracy in terms of who killed her father as she's trying to go after the guy who killed her father and Essentially, this is like Power Rangers on meth The film is shot in very low quality very awkward and weird up close-ups weird dynamic angles Going for the most hokey-ass and cheesiest crap I'm only gonna try meth once I'm not gonna be like that guy This movie was Horrifying this movie got to a point where I was so desensitized that shit like this didn't even get to me anymore In the end it turns out that the person that she's been after is Actually the son of the person who killed her father because that guy was also set up by the person who became her surrogate father What a twist could I say that I had an enjoyable time watching this no not at all This was actually really grueling to get through I had to pause several times and I'm still feeling unwell Aaron, I'm very much hoping that the other movies you suggested to me are not like this one because I never want to watch this again And kind of going back to the very strange Japanese culture There is a bit of trivia about this movie that is incredibly Disturbing apparently one of the creators of this film got the idea from a brothful he visited at a go-go bar in Thailand How am I supposed to read that any other way than the way that I am currently thinking it I do not want to have any knowledge of the back room dark seated shit These guys have been up to because this this movie is a bad movie if you are interested in weird as gore effects You might be interested in it. The fact that this was made in two weeks apparently is a pretty cool little bit I can't imagine how overworked everyone was Considering this is a near on two hour long movie, but there are also scenes that are just drawn out and repeat They even re-show this scene and that is actually tame in comparison to the flying middle finger hand Overall, I would highly highly suggest you do not try and search out this movie not kidding.   I am just saying don't go and see it Maybe you look up the clips of it on YouTube, but do not go and see this movie unless You want to regret your life decisions are more than you already do anyways guys. That's all for me I hope you enjoyed this video.


My name is Sam Vaknin and the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited, I'm a professor of psychology, and Appearance is notwithstanding, I'm a man. And so I would like to offer a few observations about women. My observations are 100% based on studies and science, and so they would tend to clash head-on with a lot of bias, prejudice, and unmitigated online nonsense. Isn't it usual on this channel? It is. So let us plunge writing. Today, to be a sexually boundaryed, a sexually principled woman, nowadays it's considered a shameful pathology. If you don't put out immediately on a first date, or after a few minutes on Tinder, something's wrong with you.  Now don't get it wrong. Casual sex is not the invention of this generation. Casual sex came into being when I was born in the early 1960s, and it has been with us since. But in the past, until about 20 years ago, casual sex was optional. It was a choice. Today, it is the norm. It is not an option. If you don't do casual sex, something is seriously wrong with you. You don't know how to have fun. You're not getting the maximum out of life.  Women have always been the guardians of the status quo.  And then having appropriated these, they became the ferocious guard dogs. They became women, became the enforcers of societal discipline, and the main agents of socialization. So men set the tone, men established the rules, men had created the expectations, the male gaze defined everything, females included, and then women stepped forward and became the most zealous members of the male cult. Now that has been the case throughout history. Females, for example, are the most ardent pro-life activists, anti-abortion activists. Women in Muslim countries are much more extreme than men in their perception of female transgressions and in the punishments that they ask and demand to meet out to their sisters. And so there is this tradition of mobilizing women to defend male interests and the male structure of society, male-dominated structure of society, non-colloquially as patriarchy. And ironically, feminism fed into this traditional role. Feminism had rendered women less empowered, less emancipated, more heartbroken and disillusioned than ever in their personal lives. You could easily say that feminism had utterly ruined, utterly ruined the chances of the modern woman to have a personal life to start with. What with career and studies and so on, nothing much is left. Women sought for well over 150 years, maybe 200 years, women sought equity and equality with men. They started by demanding the vote, equal wages, equal access to education and healthcare, equal employment opportunities, equal promotion policies in the workplace. And women had attained equity and equality in many fields and actually supremacy and superiority in many others. It's not to say that this battle is over. Women are still discriminated against. There's no wage equality and women are harassed and assaulted sexually in many workplaces. This war is still ongoing and it's a meritorious war. It's a war that men should support. It's a war that men should wage on behalf of women, together with women. But instead of doing this, men had reacted largely by abandoning a mass all women who men have just walked away, resentful, bitter, angry, enraged, entitled, they threw a spoiled brat, collective temper tantrum and they just walked away. Sometimes they did it even institutionally, like the MiGTOW movement, men going their own way. The whole monosphere is based on this, on disengagement between the genders. Men didn't take well to the ascendance of women. Men don't regard favorably women who compete with them and outdo them in many fields. And so men had abrogated any commitment and any investment in women for women and with women. Both parties, men and women, gave up on intimacy and gave up on the prospect of a relationship. Today, majority of men and women are actually either officially single or actually single. With men all but gone away, all but vanished, women were forced into the role of men, into the erstwhile roles of men, like for example, providers and breadwinners. Women are attempting to fulfill the void left behind when men had walked away. Women are attempting to become the new men and this is what we call in sociology, the stalled revolution, S-T-A-L-L-E-D, the stalled revolution. Women are becoming much more masculine. They are coerced into classical masculine roles, traditional masculine roles, because there's no one there. Men just aren't there. But something strange, psychologically speaking, something strange that happened to women in this inexorable process of becoming the new men. They became converted. They had transformed the inevitable into an ideology. They are now zealous, caricatured men, women. Women are now acting, acting out male stereotypes. They are implementing male sexual scripts and gender roles as the pillars of their newly defined femininity. I'm going to repeat this because this is mind-boggling and mind-warping. Women were forced to become men because men had absconded, men had walked away, so women were forced to begin to fulfill male chores, take on male responsibilities and male roles. Having been forced into this position, they had transformed it into an ideology. It's cognitive dissonance, of course, and so they had transformed the cognitive dissonance into an ideology. They said, actually we want it. It's not that we are forced into it, it's that we want it.  And these male artifacts are the pillars of their newly defined femininity. One such stereotype is the self-objectifying slot in a tank top, makeup and high heels. If you talk to any young woman, she would tell you that the way she dresses is an integral part of her femininity. She has a right to express herself through the way she dresses. Her clothing is not just clothing, it's a statement about her essence and quiddity as a female. And yet women don't dress the way they do because they are expressing their femininity. Women dress the way they do to attract the male gaze and male attention.  Women totally comply with male expectations on how to be dressed, how to behave, how much makeup to put, what type of makeup to put, how high the heels and how short the dress and how tanked or cropped the top.  Today is to give men what they had always dreamt of, to fulfill men's deepest fantasy and desire.   And men are getting this, men are getting precisely this from women nowadays. Women are there to fulfill men's most hidden wishes and fantasies. Is this emancipation? Is this liberation? Is this empowerment? Or is this a much more profound phase of enslavement than women had ever experienced in human history? Vossiferous protestations aside, studies conclusively show that women had also assimilated the male double standard.  It's my choice. And I don't care what people or men say about me. And I don't care what anyone says. I'm going to continue to behave the way that gratifies me and satisfies this. Of course, at a nonsense, it's a desperate and flimsy attempt to resolve deep set cognitive dissonances, deep set conflicts. Because the truth is, women judge other women as sluts. Women slut shame other women much more than men do. Women had internalized the male double standard. They are conflicted about their conduct or misconduct. Women secretly crave more in most instances of casual sex. And yet, they're not getting it. And they're not getting it.  And so they're there in casual sex, passed from one man to another, randomly, total strangers, and they pretend that they like it, that they are agentic, that it is their choice. That's the way they wanted, wanted and always did want it. They're liberated. They're emancipated. But then when we conduct studies with these very women, structured interviews, journal entries, longitudinal studies, when we talk to these women over time, we discover that deep inside, they're ashamed. They're ashamed. They feel guilty and depressed about what they're doing to themselves. They feel they're not getting a fair shake. They are not realizing either their potential or their goals. They're not getting anywhere with all this casual sex. To resolve the cognitive dissonance that this lamentable state of affairs had created, many young women pretend to be agentic and carefree. And when I say young women, I'm misleading you. It's increasingly more prevalent among older women. So it's spread. This malignancy had spread to all women of all ages because many women today are divorced. They're forced into a state of singlehood late in life. And many women are refugees from abusive relationships and they are not young anymore or not as young anymore. So women of all ages, women of all ages to resolve this cognitive dissonance, they pretend to be agentic, carefree. They pretend to make choices. They are in control, they will tell you, when in reality, they're actually drunk most of the time. In well over 90%, between 80 and 90%, depending on the study of casual sex instances, the woman is drunk to the point of blackout. In 20% of the cases, she is in blackout. These women are devastated in most of these encounters.  The other 57% claim to like it, but then when we drill deeper, they tell you the sex is horrible. And indeed, anywhere between 10 and 20% of women orgasm, the others don't. We have studied by Ornstein, Ornstein, Wade, Cohen, Armstrong, many, many others. They are hundreds of studies. You can't fly in the face of these studies. You can't deny them. The evidence is absolutely crushing and overwhelming in well over 20 countries on five continents. The situation is identical everywhere. Women, with their feminism, had pushed themselves into a corner, and they don't know how to get themselves out of that corner, except by pretending that the corner had been a choice or a strategy all along. You know, it's not a bug, it's a feature. It's not a defeat. It was claimed in advance. It's a tactical retreat. But actually feminism, feminism had defeated women. They feel defeated. The depressed rates of depression and anxiety and suicide among women had quintupled and tripled over the last 15 years. And men, what do men do in the face of all this? They are jubilant. They're celebrating. Heaven had descended on earth. Men take advantage of this self-inflicted female injury. Men had become aggressive about demanding immediate sex, and they offer nothing in return. And women end up with the worst of both worlds. The women are being held responsible the way men used to be, responsible for a career, for home, for children, and so on. The way men used to be. But at the same time, they're suffering from slut-shaming, the double standard, and harassment, as women always had. Feminism failed to get rid of obnoxious male behaviors. If anything, it had exacerbated them. There's an increased, marked increase in sexual assault well over one quarter of first days and in rape. There is also a strong deterioration in the quality of sex, even in one nightstands. Anal has taken over. Anal has taken over from vagina. And most women will tell you that anal is not exactly what men think it is. Women don't like anal, the majority of them. So it's a men's world, and men are imposing the sexual education that they had acquired from pornography on women. And women are forced to become porn stars, including forced to create self-phonography, which is then posted online, or used to blackmail them. Men manipulate women.   That's the way you should be. But privately, men still shame these women, call them sluts, hoes, mock them, pass their names and details. Whenever you go to a new city, if you know where to look, you'll get a list of women available, as easy lays, and the local sluts. Men manipulate women. They egg on women. They push them to implement this ideology, because it's good for men. This ideology is a disaster, an unmitigated disaster for women. I see no plus, no plus in the existence of the modern woman, none, only minuses. I'm talking about the private life, the personal life, not the professional life. The private life is demolished and eradicated beyond reconstruction in my view. And Western men are the worst, because they egregiously lie and pretend to be tolerant of female unbridled sexuality. Whatever it takes, baby, I'm with you.  They keep telling women what they want to hear these Western men.  What is your strategy and vision? Why are you going with all this? No man is saying this, because it is the men's interest to perpetuate this condition, where women offer free sex and ask for nothing in return, not even a second date. And so Western men especially perpetuate this dysfunctional and self-defeating female behaviors, and it's a toxic macabre dance.  Name calling is the scoundrel's last resort. When you don't have good counter arguments, you name call, you go ad hominem, you attack the messenger, not the message, because there's nothing to say against science and against hundreds of studies. What can a woman say, a modern woman? How can a modern woman refute a single sentence I've just said? Every word I've just said is backed by dozens of studies. I refer you to my video on hookups, where I made a literature review with 91 studies. So every sentence I said is backed by science. What do women have to say to counter anything I said?  And I'm more of a woman lover definitely than any feminist. The double standard is deplorable. It's an abomination.  And the sexual behavior of men has different social costs or no social costs or even social rewards, whereas an identical behavior by a female, by a woman, would be penalized somehow with social opprobrium up to losing your job. So this is the double standard.  He is a player.  It's double standard and it's horrible because men and women, men and women were created equal, not identical. Thank God they are not identical. It is the difference that creates attraction and it is attraction that creates life and perpetuates it. So men and women should never be identical and that's women's mistake. They're trying to be identical to men, but they are equal. And the double standard impinges on that equality, but it is a fact. To ignore the fact of the double standard is delusional, self-deceiving, and costly in terms of relationship prospects and reputation. The way to overcome the double standard is not to outman men, but to teach men to be more considerate, compassionate, and respectful. Women fail to appreciate the reputational halo effect. The notoriety of a woman carries out into other ostensibly unrelated areas of their lives, of her life, of breaching social norms and mores, even if they are deplorable, like the double standard. It carries a lifelong, it's a lifelong, all-pervasive sentence.  When I'm single, I'm highly promiscuous, but when I'm in a relationship, I can be trusted to be self-respecting, decent, and boundaryed. No man is going to buy this. Once a woman had made the choice to be self-trashing, self-objectifying, unboundary in sex, that's the end. She acquires a reputation and she is no longer relationship material. She is a commodity to be passed around, sometimes by multiple men in group sex settings. It's much less rare than you would believe. Go online and read Rothman's work on trains. Train. It's a new name for multiple men having sex with the same woman one after the other, not together. There's this, gang banks, there's group sex, and it's a growing phenomenon. These are growing phenomenon even in high school, but they're targeted at specific women, the women who had acquired the reputation. So you can't say this.  You can't say in sex I'm drunk and self-trashing with my colleagues, but I expect my colleagues, the same colleagues, to respect me at work. You can't say this, it's not going to work. It's not going to work. And now let me get to the counter-argument, the only counter-argument that can be offered by women, any woman who is listening to this video. She can have only one counter-argument. Why? Because everything I said is backed by decades of scholarly literature with hundreds of thousands of interviews and people who participated in these studies over five continents. There's no escaping anything I've said. It's all 100,000, 1000% true. You can't argue with science. You can't argue with facts. You can't argue with the preponderance of studies. Meta-analyze properly. Studies which were well-crafted, well-conducted, well-designed. You can't do that. It's the end of the road. It's the final station. The train must stop here. The buck must stop here. So when women face this, they have a trump card. It's exactly like black people. When you argue with them about some things, they have a trump card.  The same with women. You argue with them about some things based 100% on science and studies, and they have a trump card.   No speech act founded on science is hate speech. None. Wherever the data may lead, we are obligated to follow. If our preponderance of well-crafted studies or meta-analysis of such studies point to the conclusion, to a conclusion, and that conclusion is politically incorrect, one has the moral obligation to adhere to the facts, regardless of the prevailing censorship, regardless of a threat, the dictatorial, totalitarian threat of cancel culture, regardless of mob rule through social media, or the oculocracy of social media. If I look at the data and the studies are well-designed and convinced me, and there are hundreds of them, and they're over decades, and they're everywhere, and they're also identical results. I don't care if these results are politically correct. I couldn't give a damn. I couldn't care less. I follow that my God and my religion are data. My God and my religion is the scientific method. My sacred literature of these studies, their facts, you cannot argue with them however unpalatable they are, however much they undermine your self-justifying resolutions of your cognitive dissonance. Women behave in ways which create in them enormous dissonance and conflict, and to resolve this, they are lying to themselves and to others, and men are happy to collaborate with these lies, to perpetuate them, to enhance them and amplify them, because it works in favor of men, and it works against women. Feminism is the greatest disaster that had happened to women, ever, absolutely ever, and this is supported by science, not by propaganda and indoctrination, and other nonsense, academic nonsense, academic political nonsense. They are facts, and they are known facts. These are the only two entities in science, so there are facts, casual sex has severe, long-term, deleterious mental health effects, and they affect women only. Fact. What to do? It's a fact. Victim-hood movements are being infiltrated by covert narcissists and secondary psychopaths. Fact. Lately. These are facts.  These people are narcissistic, psychopathic, and Machiavellian. Facts. Unpleasant facts, because so many women are engaged in these kind of activities, had adopted these kind of behaviors, because these behaviors made them more men than men, more emancipated, more liberated, more empowered, more in control of their destiny, or so they believe. This is psychopathic defiance. It's narcissistic grandiosity. Studies are saying this, not me. So we need to look at these studies, and we need to base our decision-making and our entire future on these, on data, clear-eyed look at reality. We need to emerge from the cocoon of ideology. We need to demolish political correctness. It's a scourge. It's a malignancy on the body of human progress and enlightenment. And we need to begin to talk, talk less, as we say in Yiddish, talk business. And the business is simple. Women had fallen prey to their own contorted thinking and their own confabulated ideologies. And men are delighted to leverage this increasing self-deception in their favor. Men are taking advantage of women's confusion and befuddlement and disorientation. And they're egging them on, and they're increasing, increasing the miasma in which women are immersed and embedded, because it's good for men. They're getting everything they want, and they're giving nothing in return. Women, wake up, wake up. It's already way too late.