All right, we're ready to begin. Hello and welcome everyone. Thank you for joining us for our program, Galatius, California, Tales of Rascality, Revelry, Interpretation and Depravity and the Birth of the Golden State with author Gary Neu. I'm Laura Shepherd, Director of Events at the Mechanics Institute. And we're very pleased to welcome Gary back for his new book. Now, certainly after such a tumultuous day at our nation's capital yesterday, this reflection on California history may not make us so proud of our past, but it certainly gives us character and also shows us that anything is possible here in the Golden State. Galatius, California tours the rambunctious and occasionally appalling amusements of the Golden State, including gambling, duels, knife fights, racist dining and gluttony, prostitution, fandangos, cigars, con artistry and demon drink. Historian Gary Neu unearths a myriad primary sources, which some of which have not even been seen before, to create this wonderful book of tales of California. And again, we're very pleased to welcome Gary back. Now, of course, in the middle of all this story is Mechanics Institute, since we were founded in 1854, and we continue to be one of San Francisco's most vital literary and cultural centers in the heart of the city. And of course, in 1854, we were one of the more civilizing influences with our library and our chess club, civilizing wild San Francisco. So if you're new to the Mechanics Institute, please see our website and also tell your friends to join up on our e-list to hear about more of our programs that are all happening online. Also, our talk will be followed by Q and A. So again, if you have questions, you can put them in the chat and Pam will be reading off the questions to Gary and we'll have a nice conversation afterwards. Also, the book, Palatius, California can be purchased at alexanderbook.com and Pam will also put that in the chat. So if you'd like to purchase books from our local bookstore, that would be great. And now I would like to introduce our guest, a Sierra Nevada native and current resident, Gary Newey taught at the Sierra College from 1987 to 2012. There he founded the Center for Sierra Nevada Studies and served as its director until his retirement. His previous titles include Sierra stories, tales of dreamers, schemers, bigots and rogues, also published by Hay Day, which won the gold medal for best regional nonfiction from the next generation indie book awards and also illuminated landscape, a Sierra Nevada anthology, which he co-edited and also distant horizon documents from the 19th century American West. And you can visit his website at garynewey.com. And also I wanna thank our great colleagues over at Hay Day for collaborating on this program. It's always a pleasure to work with our local publishing house. So once again, I wanna say that Gary's writing is as wonderful, colorful and as entertaining as his subject. So please welcome Gary Newey. Well, thank you, Laura. Thank you for that lovely introduction. I wanna say thank you to you at Mechanics Institute and to thank you and Pam who's running the keyboards for our little band here tonight. As Laura mentioned, this is the second time I've spoken for Mechanics Institute, very different circumstances. It was in 2017 when I talked about my then book Gold Rush Stories. It's different now, of course, we're all in our little Zoom cubicles and I hope you all are doing well in these challenging times. I know I've been stuck in this house since March and I gotta tell you, the people who actually live here really wish I would leave, but what are you gonna do? Hopeful at Eastern. I am glad to be here and thank you all for being here tonight. I'd like to talk to you tonight about and you saw the cover. I'm gonna go about my book, my new book, Coletius, California. And I thought I'd start by talking about the origins of the book. As Laura mentioned, I've written other books about 19th century America. I'm gonna do a little show and tell here. A book called Distant Horizon documents of the 19th century American West with Hay Day illuminated landscape on Sierra Nevada literature, which I did with my friend Rick Heidi. Laura mentioned was Sierra Stories, which is unusual stories of the Sierra Nevada, also a Hay Day and Sierra College Press book. And when I was here before in 2017, it was Gold Rush Stories, which are stories about California Gold Rush, a Hay Day and Sierra College Press book too. And when I did these books, there's something I discovered and I really didn't realize this until I did my Gold Rush Stories book. And that is when I looked at these events and the individuals that I was writing about invariably with very few exceptions, whatever they did, whatever was impactful or noteworthy was tied to a vice. When they were doing it, they were gambling or they were drinking or they were smoking or they were fighting or dueling or eating too much or involved in a crime like prostitution or they were con artists or they were involved with certain forms of entertainment or listening to a singer or watching a stage show at the time of the event. And I thought to myself, if I'm going to get a real sense of what this 19th century world of California and the American West is like, I should focus on the common denominator which are the vices. So I decided in Helacious, California to write about in the 19th century California world about these various forms of vices and how they impacted the development of California, the birth of the Golden State, the Gold Rush Year all the way through the end of the 19th century and to focus on that. And that's what the nature of the book is. So our theme tonight, what I'm going to talk about in Helacious, California is life in 19th century California. And it was a period of enormous memorable change. And if we look at it, we see the development of a vision of California that we have today that's a not always accurate one. The vision we have of California today is we're innovative, we're a kind of classic, we're rule breaking, we're on the cutting edge of societal development. And many of those kind of venerable California traits as we see them today can be traced back to the 19th century in California and with these vices attached to them. The time period that the book deals with is from 1821 to 1900, from when Mexico gained independence from the Spanish empire all the way to the end of the 19th century. And an examination of the vices of the time period. And if you think of California in the 19th century, there were huge changes, enormous changes. And most of them in the 1821 to 1900 period occurred in the first 30 years through 1850. Just think about this. California went from being a distant outpost of an empire, the Spanish empire, to a largely ignored province of Mexico, Alta, California, to a short lived independent republic, the Bear Flag Republic, to a period at the beginning of the Gold Rush era in which there was a curious mix of what historians call a self-governing dominion in which California was basically on its own with very little law and a military governorship and then statehood. And all of that happened within about a 30 year period within a generation with all of the major social changes, with all of the different legal systems, with all of the various cultures that were rushing in to California. And then you layer on top of that the impact of the seminal event of 19th century California which is the Gold Rush in which you have huge population bursts, 1500% increase in population in one year. 300,000 people come in a matter of months basically to California. You have the single largest migration of people to a single place for a single purpose in 600 years since the Crusades. Huge changes. And out of this comes this vision we have of California. And if you look at this old California period, I really think it can be summarized in a string of four letter words. And you don't have to, you don't have to cover your ears for these four letter words. It's words like fear and love and lust, hate, loss, pain, hope. And probably the most significant one of this time period, the word free. Personal liberty, freedom from government interference, freedom to do whatever you wanted without fear of a retribution was hugely important. But it wasn't just exclusive to 19th century California. This is true throughout the United States. And they are really true today. They describe all of our experiences regardless of the year. Human nature doesn't change much. But what made old California's experience different which is I focus on in Alacias, California is that there was a sense of immediacy and urgency and intensity that was very, very unique. And it helped define the California we know today in a very complex and complicated way. 19th century California was all about rapidity, all about rapid change. There was a Scottish observer who came to the California Goldfields in 1853. His name was John David Borthwick. And when he wrote about society in the gold rush, he wrote this, he said, the everyday jog trot of ordinary human existence was not a fast enough pace for Californians in their impetuous pursuit of wealth. The longest period of time ever thought of was a month. Everything was turnover, everything was change. Everything was impermanent. This was a world, 19th century California that was dedicated to impermanence. It was a world that revered change. It expected change, it desired change. It was the stamp of this society. And out of this, how it played out was there was this live for the moment, anything goes ethos that developed. It translated into specific things for instance, like courtships were very short in California. Throughout the United States in the 19th century, courtships were either short or very long. And in California, they were uniquely short. It was not unusual for courtships from meeting somebody to getting married to take place in a day or two. That was not uncommon in the 19th century. That also leads to another characteristic, which was that marriages were often very brief in which the short courtships led to incompatibility. And as a result, California led the nation by far in divorces. Just to give you an idea, the second state in terms of divorces per capita was New York. California was one. California had twice as many divorces per capita annually than New York, which was the second state. It also was a world in which because everything changed rapidly and things were ephemeral. Towns, relationships and so forth that quick resolutions to disputes were also quite common. And this could take the form of violence. Dueling, for instance, was a way to bypass, in some cases, a non-existent legal system. And so California was characterized by a sense of violence and quick result resolution of problems that was really remarkable. One thing I learned in writing this book that I've spent a lot of time in the 19th century talking about and writing about these things is I thought forever that the center of violence in mid 19th century America was New York City with the gangs of New York, the Five Points region and so forth until I read some groundbreaking research, recent research by historian. I hope I pronounced his last name correctly. His name was Eric Moncanon, I believe. And he did a study of violence in mid 19th century America and found that without question, the most violent place, the murder capital of United States was Southern California. It was Los Angeles specifically, far greater than New York. And so there was a lot of this rapidity and an urgency and immediacy that played itself out in the day-to-day activities of Californians in the 19th century. It leads to something that is really quite unique, I think, in examining the American West in that California in the 19th century because everything changed so rapidly really didn't establish any traditions because people were here for a short time or they moved or they changed their outlook or their profession. Real traditions really didn't establish themselves. And there's a historian by the name of James Gregory who I've quoted in the book, wrote a fabulous essay called The Shaping of California. If you please indulge me, I'm gonna read from the book here. He wrote this. He said, continuous repopulation is the critical drama of California's history and the source of some of its unique cultural claims. Wave after wave of newcomers from an ever-changing list of places that have remade California again and again over the years, each time adding something new, even while they allow the state to retain its most paradoxical tradition, their tradition of change. So of all the traditions that California had, it changed. One of the characteristics as well was the response to all of this by institutions, by the government. And one of the things that the 19th century showed was that there was a pattern. Whatever the vice was, drinking and gambling, say we'll use that as an example, there was outrage. In the beginning of California as a state, there were some of the first earliest legislation was restrictions and prohibitions on gambling in which the legislation said, we disapprove of these excesses and vices and we are gonna pass legislation to regulate and prohibit it and then comes the end of the pattern which is they were ignored. They paid no attention to it, but they addressed it. So you have constantly in California this dichotomy between change and addressing it and not doing anything and rapid change and urgency and immediacy and intensity that characterized 19th century California. And that's what this book here, Volatius California focuses on, how these vices impacted the development of the state and how it demonstrates the fact that there is constant change, a transition, almost constantly roiling transition between addressing something and not addressing it, between changing something and not changing thing a very complicated world that sets the stage for events to come in our present day world. That leads me to the title of the book which is Helatius California and why did I choose the word Helatius for the title? Well, if you've heard the word Helatius, you're probably like I was when I started this process. When you hear the word Helatius, you think of something terrible like there was a Helatius car accident. But in reality, and this is the reason I chose the word Helatius for the title, Helatius has two meanings depending on how you use it. Helatius can mean something astonishing or awe-inspiring or it can mean something appalling and destructive or it can mean both at the same time depending on how it's used. Let me give you some examples. This duality perfectly reflects, I think, the fact that California in the 19th century did stuff that was impressive, but it also did things that were disconcerting and troubling, sometimes at the same time, it was very complicated nature of the state. And so, just to give you a couple of quick examples, the nature of Helatius. I'm sure you've all encountered at some time or another one of those hailstorms that sweeps across Northern California, particularly if you live in the foothills or the Sierra Nevada, which they got those big old hailstones, bigger than golf balls that sweep across the landscape. Well, if you look at that hailstorm in one way, you look at that and say that is astonishing, amazing demonstration of the power and majesty of nature. But you look at the same hailstorm and you can say, that hailstorm was dangerous, knocking down tree limbs and cracking windows and breaking car windshields. It's just destructive and damaging and terrible. That's Helatius, a Helatius hailstorm. But you can also look at it and say, that was an astonishing hailstorm that was very destructive, both at the same time simultaneously. That's Helatius. And California demonstrated that, that it had this mix constantly, that was good and bad, light and dark, impactful and destructive, remarkable and horrifying, sometimes all at the same time. And what the book does is it looks at some of the events and devices and how this played out. Let me give you two more examples. This is more in tune with the way I wrote the book through storytelling. Two more examples of Helatius. And for both of these, we need to go into the time machine. And the first one, we go back to November 21st, 1897. And there we see in the San Francisco Call newspaper, an article written by a man named Isaac Coggin. Now the name Isaac Coggin may not mean anything to you. He was a San Franciscan. But my guess is that you may have been, probably have been, to the venue he's responsible for. If you go to Golden Gate Park, there is the big, beautiful bandshell outside, bandshell for outside concerts in the middle of the park. Well, Isaac Coggin in the 1890s was the general manager and conductor of the Golden Gate Park Band. Back when outdoor concerts were incredibly popular. And when he took over, the structure for the concerts was kind of this rude wooden structure, but they became more popular than money was allocated to build this big, beautiful bandshell structure that is still there today. So Isaac Coggin was a well-respected, well-known figure in San Francisco society. But on November 21st, 1897, a newspaper article appeared in the San Francisco Call newspaper. Excuse me just a minute. Oh, I got a little frog in my throat. And in this article in the San Francisco Call newspaper, respected newspaper, Isaac Coggin tells the story of something that happened to him at Lake Tahoe 30 years earlier. And it was very much a surprise to people who knew Coggin. And what Coggin relates is that when he was a young man in the 1860s, he worked as an agricultural laborer at Lake Tahoe and he had a day off. So he decided to go hunting along the shoreline of Lake Tahoe and he took his favorite dog and he was hiking along the shoreline of Lake Tahoe when all of a sudden his dog sniffed and turned and started running. And just parenthetically, the dog was running very fast. They did not find the dog for three days. And when they found it, it was cowering under a porch of a cabin. Well, Coggin quickly found out why the dog had run off because as he stood on the shore of Lake Tahoe, he looked up the hillside away from the lake and he heard this crashing banging noise and trees were falling over and boulders were rolling by him and splashing into the lake. He didn't know what it was. Was it an earthquake, a landslide? He had no idea. But Coggin decided that the safest place for him to be was up in a tree. So he climbs 20 feet up into a pine tree and there he looks up the hill. He looks up the hill and he sees the trees and the crashing noise and emerging from the forest comes this creature.  And as it crashes through the trees and the rocks and passes by Coggin, remember he's 20 feet up in the tree, the head of the creature passes by five feet above him. And Coggin says the head of the creature is 14 feet wide.  The neck is 14 feet across and he estimates the humpy bumpy body of this to be 600 feet long. And then he watches as the creature, the serpent rumbles down to the lake and enters into the water and swims out into the lake and disappears. Coggin in this article says there were nine other eyewitnesses to this. Well, we hear this today and we think this guy is just nuts. But this was at a time when in the 1890s, it had been 40 years since Yosemite had been, Yosemite Valley had been opened up for tourism and still the estimates are that more than half of Californians did not believe a place like Yosemite existed. This was only four years after a giant sequoia was cut down in 1893 to go to the Chicago World's Fair to demonstrate to people back east that there were trees that big, they didn't believe that. And it was a time period in which in San Francisco in particular in the 1890s, a very popular event, I guess you'd call it was something called spirit photography where it was widely believed that you could photograph the ghosts of dead relatives. So maybe a large creature 600 feet long living in Lake Tahoe was not so far out of the ordinary. That's astonishing, that's elacious. That's part of the mix of California. Those of you who are familiar with Lake Tahoe lore know the story of Tahoe Tessie, which is supposedly a Loch Ness-like monster that lives in the lake. This may have been, Coggin's story may have been a building on that or may have been the origin of that story. So that's the astonishing part of hellacious and there's stories like that in California where people are impressed by the wonders that California has. But then there's the other part of the equation. And for this, we need to hop in the time machine and go back to 1855 to the North Fork of the American River. And there, it's in the Gold Rush period, there are prospectors wandering along the North Fork which goes through Auburn. And they're wandering along the shore of the river bank of the North Fork looking for a place to dig into gold pan.  And so they think it's a good place to dig up this already loosened dirt to do some gold panning. And they start digging away the dirt when all of a sudden they see a flash of red. And they're taken aback and they dig a little bit more and they see more red. And then finally, as they move away the dirt, the arm of a body falls out of the river bank of a young man wearing a red flannel shirt. And they remove the body and according to, and they don't know this young man, there's no identification. And according to the accounts of this event, the miners say nothing. It becomes eerily silent. And they take the body and they lovingly take it up the river bank away from the river and they bury it and they form a kind of rudimentary coffin. And then they bury the young man. They say absolutely nothing. And then they move on. And recounting this event later, one of the individuals, one of the miners said, we said nothing because we were so moved by the fact that this young man, his family would never know what happened to him. His friends would never know what happened to him. And as soon as we walked away, no one would ever know where his grave was. And to us, it was so deeply moving because we knew that, but for the grace of God, that could be us. Well, that's salacious too. That's part of the mix. This light and dark, remarkable and horrifying, impactful world that California found itself in. And it played itself out through the vices, through indulgence and also rejection, through anything goes, not worrying about the consequences, to trying to regulate and prohibit it and oftentimes failing. 19th century California wasn't all frivolity and dancing and Barbary Coast excesses and gold rush, what I call your Pate Your Wagon Syndrome, everybody's happy and is almost comical. It was a mix. It was very much reflective of human emotions and it was so intense. Everything happened so rapidly. Now I changed a little bit what I wanted to talk about tonight because of the events as Laura mentioned in her introduction, the events of yesterday. In Washington D.C. As I watched that in horrors, I think we all did. I couldn't help it, I've written lots of books about the 19th century, a lot of the time my head is spent in the 19th century. I couldn't help but think about events that took place back in the 19th century that had some similarities to this.  Human emotion and human nature doesn't change much but the circumstances always do and so it's never the same. But I do subscribe to a philosophy that's attributed to, falsely attributed to Mark Twain and he supposedly said actually to someone else that are not quite sure who said that history doesn't repeat itself but on occasions it does rhyme. It sounds similar, it looks similar but it's not exactly the same. And as I watched the events yesterday, I thought in the 19th century there was the assault on the Capitol building in 1814 by the British when they burnt the Capitol building down. I thought of 1855 when there was violence on the floor of the Senate, when Charles Sumner was beaten on the floor of the Senate about the fact that guns were drawn in a political debate on the House of Representatives floor in the 1830s and as I watched the reaction to events yesterday, I saw and still see it today, the immediacy and the urgency and the intensity of the response in American life to the events of what happened in Washington DC yesterday. And I thought to myself, that's got to be the same kind of intensity and emotional urgency that you saw throughout the 19th century California experience where people want immediate action, they're emotional, they're passionate, it's similar I think. And so as I thought about this, I thought in the time we have remaining, I thought I would just share with you, take some of the important issues of today and some of the parallels that took place in 19th century California. Today, I think the three major issues that face us are election disputes and violence, whole issue of racial reckoning and the pandemic. Well, let's start with election disputes and violence. We saw the outgrowth of that yesterday. Well, on November 2nd, 1852, it was election day in the United States, presidential election year, Franklin Pierce was elected president that year. In Sacramento, a fire broke out and it probably was an accident, but at the time the belief was that the fire was set by individuals who were unhappy with the results of the presidential election, who thought the election was corrupt and probably influenced by outsiders, probably foreign interference. Sound familiar? Well, the results of this in Sacramento was there were six dead, there were 2,500 buildings destroyed, 2,500 buildings destroyed, and in today's money, in excess of $500 billion, 500, half a billion dollars worth the property damage. So there's a similarity. When it comes to racial reckoning, we are of course seeing the aftermath of the George Floyd death. Well, in California, there was a racial reckoning as well. In the 1850s, the black population of California were heavily restricted. There was no slavery in California, but there was major discrimination and in particular, one thing that the African-American population of California hated was the fact that blacks were not allowed to testify against whites in court. So this led to a series of what at the time were called the colored conventions in California, three of them, to discuss legal remedies for injustices and discrimination against African-Americans in California with the focus on this testimony issue. And one of the delegates from Nevada County, the county where I was born, born in Grass Valley, one of the delegates to the first convention said this. He said, it is with pride I say we are resolved to let them see that all we want is an equal chance and open field and a fair fight. We intend to disprove the allegation that we are inferior to them. These are words that could be said today. The end result of this was that the testimony ban was not lifted. An assembly bill was introduced in soon afterwards, assembly bill 339, which was called an act to restrict and prevent the immigration and residence in the state of Negroes and mulattoes. That was the title of the bill. And under the proposed law, blacks who visited California had to register entry into the state and they were restricted in their entry and blacks who lived in California had to carry a registration certificate proving their residence. And if they did not have their certificate, they could go to prison. This was not compulsory for any other group in the state and other groups like the Chinese and native Californians were also heavily discriminated against. Only the blacks were targeted in this way. And the law didn't pass for technical reasons, but for black Californians, it was so disgusting that this was even being considered that ultimately 15% of California's black population migrated to Britain, so these accused had some similarities to today's world too. And then the pandemic, of course, I must say that when I wrote this book, if I had had a crystal ball, I would have entered something, written something about pandemics. But I literally, on the day I received what used to be called Gallyproofs, the PDF, the printout of what the book looks like, literally on the day I got it was the day they were starting to have restrictions on lockdowns in California over COVID-19. So I couldn't do it. But there was a pandemic that impacted California as well. In the mid-1850s, specifically 1850 itself, there was a cholera pandemic. And the cholera pandemic was part of, we're into almost the end of year one of the COVID pandemic. This cholera pandemic in the mid-19th century, part of three waves of the cholera epidemic in the 19th century, this particular wave lasted 30 years. And in 1850, roughly 10% of California's population died in the cholera pandemic. And it hit very hard, it lasted at its height about 30 days. Including in Sacramento, there were 17 doctors who died from cholera, which was virtually all of the medical corps in Sacramento in 1850. There's a monument to them in the old Sacramento Historic Cemetery. It was about 1200 people. But the population of California in 1850, this was before everybody was here for the California Gold Rush, was about 100,000. So if we had the same percentage of our population die today, it would be about 400,000 people. The cholera pandemic in 1850 saw widespread denial of the fact that it was impacting them and the aggressive promotion of bogus cures of quackery, which has some similarities to what is happening with us today. There are parallels. It's not exactly the same, but there are similarities. And what I tell my students when I teach history is that the goal, the ideal goal of history is to learn from it, that hopefully we won't make the mistakes in the future. But the sad reality is that oftentimes we don't learn from it. And it's a testament to what I think is important, which is to get as much information as you possibly can to learn as much of the history of the past so that you have a database that you can draw upon that's if issues affect us, hellacious issues affect us in the future. We have a response, something we can draw upon to make informed decisions. This 19th century California was a remarkable time period, very complicated with all of these different aspects impacting the direction of California life. And I'd like to leave you with something from the book that I think demonstrates this dichotomous nature of California in the 19th century as reflected in its entertainment's advices and so forth. This is a story from 1859. I'm just gonna read it from the book and let me set the stage a little bit. In 1859 in San Francisco, there was a tourist attraction by the name of the Mountaineer Museum. And it was run by a man named John Adams who was a migrant from Massachusetts. He was a shoemaker by trade but he had become an animal collector, hunter and trapper. And he went by the name, this is a name I'm sure you've heard, he called himself Grizzly Adams. And he had this museum in downtown San Francisco on what became the Barbary Coast and there he displayed all kinds of wild animals. He had bears of all kinds including a grizzly bear named Samson. He had elk and eagles and African lions and tigers. He had mountain lions. And he was especially proud, his advertisements emphasize this. He also had an enormous hog. Well, at the same time of this, and he's always, Adams was trying to promote his museum all the time. Well, at the same time this was taking place, one of the most popular sports athletic endeavors of the time period is something that doesn't exist anymore. It's called pedestrianism. And pedestrianism was walking races and it took various forms but the most famous of these were marathon walking races in which a group of men who would walk until all of them dropped out but except one it was akin to the marathon dancing of the Great Depression. And the great proponent, the great superstar of California pedestrians was a man named James Kennevin. He called himself Uncle Jimmy Kennevin and he was lionized for his gumption and his perseverance in this pedestrianism activity. There was actually a biography that was written about him that sold well called the Life and Adventures of James Kennevin Champion Pedestrian of the World. And so it was proposed by Kennevin to Adams to work together to promote Kennevin and Grizzly Adams Museum. So let me read this to you. This is from the book. In 1859, in a moment that perfectly encapsulates the intersection of the eccentric and extraordinary in old California entertainment, Uncle Jimmy Kennevin proposed staging a public spectacle in association with Grizzly Adams.  In return, Uncle Jimmy, who was at that point essentially destitute would receive handsome compensation for the deed. Grizzly Adams wholeheartedly agreed to the promotion and with this quote unquote piece of recklessness as it was called in the Life and Adventures of James Kennevin Champion Pedestrian of the World, Uncle Jimmy quote accomplished much to his own pecuniary assistance and to Adams delight. At the conclusion of the stunt and only a few seconds after Kennevin left the cage, the bear attacked one of Adams handlers and tore off the man's right arm. There you have it. The astonishing and horrifying all at once, Palacios, California. That was the nature of the world that California found itself in 19th century and which impacts us to this day. Thank you. Thank you, Gary for that wonderful introduction to your very, very, very rich and colorful book. I'll just start off to ask you first of all about the book cover. And do we know more about, I mean, California, the great promoters and advertisers of everything from the simplest to the most extravagant. Do we know anything about this gregarious gal on the cover? This is a very bold advertisement, isn't it? Very unique. This is, yes, this was when we were, I was looking for images for the book. I came across this and the wonderful designer of the cover, Ashley Ingram from Hay Day, said this would be perfect one because it kind of has the sass and the fire that you're talking about in the book. The interesting thing about this image is that the title of it is Young Man Smoking a Cigar. Young Man. And it's clearly a woman. And the belief is, I think it's a theatrical photograph. That this was an actress and it was quite common in those days for men to play women and women to play men in theatrical productions. And that's what I think this is. But in terms of kind of the attitude that was part of the world in 19th century Cal, I think it's just a perfect image for it. But that's all we know. There was nothing other than the fact that it was identified as a man. All right, well, we're gonna go on to some of our questions from the audience. Pam's gonna read out the questions. Here we go. We have a question from Andrew Ogus. Two, we asked two questions. The first one is, is there evidence of gay relationships in the freer days of early California? And the answer is yes. You have to kind of read between the lines that when you read the stories, there will be references to what were essentially gay partners. But they will couch it in such a way that it's veiled and kind of coded, but you get an idea that this was actually a gay relationship. And you find this a lot in diaries, in particular during the Gold Rush days. I was able to, and I wrote my Gold Rush book to have access to the state library to letters and diaries that hadn't been looked at for decades. And there are references to these kinds of things as well. There's also evidence, and I present this in the book too, that there were relationships across the board in illegal activities like prostitution too, that were also involved in the gay community or were gender variant in some way. And so it was, it's there, but you really have to look and you kind of have to understand the code to get the reference. It's not explicit, explicitly mentioned. The second question is, were the divorce laws more liberal here than elsewhere? Yes, the answer is yes. Not in the beginning, but as time went on, the divorce laws became the most liberal in the United States. And in particular, what's interesting about the actual statistics is that at least three quarters of all the divorce actions were introduced by women. And marriages were quick, courtships were quick, but women had a greater degree of control over their marital destiny than in other places. Other places in the United States during this time period, divorce was a two-part process. You had to get permission to pursue a divorce action first and then do the divorce action. And in many cases, women were denied even the first step. So California made it easier to get divorces. And in many respects, it was because of the nature of the California society and that women were relatively rare and that relationships started quickly and ended quickly. So yes, absolutely much more liberal. The next question's from Colleen Casey. When the cholera epidemic occurred in 1850, did people wear masks in social distance or what did they do to limit exposure? Yeah, that's nothing like today. The responses were, let me preface this by saying, when all this happened, when all the COVID stuff happened, I looked at, because I knew of the cholera pandemic, I looked at the reaction to communities to the arrival of the cholera epidemic because they know it was common. And you look at, and most of this happened in November of 1850, you look at the newspapers in October in Sacramento, for instance, and they will say, well, there's reports of cholera in San Francisco, but it's not gonna hit us.  And then there's cholera a week later in Stockton. Oh, but it's not gonna come to Sacramento. And then the next thing you know, the Sacramento Union newspaper, for instance, is publishing daily what's called the Mortality Report, listing everybody that's died in Sacramento that day and every single one of them says cholera. And 10 days earlier, there were no cases and they were not at all fearful of it. Major denial. The response to it was, there were advertisements galore during this time period for elixirs and potions that you could take to cure cholera. Most of them were just repurposed. They were patent medicines had been around to treat diarrhea, for instance, that were sold as cholera pandemic cures. And probably the worst of all of the responses was in Sacramento, in which cholera is a water-based disease. In Sacramento, they came to, some entrepreneurs came to the conclusion that the problem was people weren't drinking water that was natural enough. The water was what was bringing the cholera to them. And so they went down to the river, Sacramento River and just dunked barrels in the river and sold the water as quote unquote, Sacramento Strait. And that was sold as a cure for cholera and it actually was a delivery system for it. But in terms of the kinds of things we see today, there was nothing quite like that. Another question from Carol Verberg. Considering how reluctant people were in the 19th century to record any details about vice for publication, how did you track down this info? Well, I have to disagree a little bit. It depends on who you look for. There are lots of people who kept diaries that were almost daily records of various vices, gambling and drinking, particularly drinking. There was one man named Alfred Doughton who kept a diary for 50 years and virtually every day he listed how much alcohol he drank. And he actually invented different terms for being drunk. He called it being tight or being bamboozled in different names like that. There are records of people who kept records of gambling and vice and there are commercial records of prostitution. They're there. And finding them has become increasingly easier. When I first started doing this stuff 20-something years ago, you had to go find the actual documents and nothing was digitized today because things are digitized, you can find them much easier. And a great resource, if you're gonna do any research on this, I wanna recommend is the California Digital Newspaper Collection, which was run by UC Riverside, I think it is, that's all searchable and has newspapers from the mid-19th century all the way up to today as a great research tool. And it's much easier today, but the material's there. And a lot of people were reluctant, you're correct in your question, people were reluctant, but you can still find it. And it's fascinating to see the extent that people would go to indulge their vices. I have a question from Eric Craig Moody. Is there evidence of people moving to California to get a quote, California divorce unquote? And during the 50s of the 20th century, there were Nevada divorces. Was there was something similar going on in the 19th century with California? Well, I must confess, I'm not familiar with the term Nevada divorce, but that's the answer to your first question, which is people coming to California to get divorced. Yes, it happened. There were young men who had married prior to the Gold Rush and came to California during the Gold Rush and then never returned to California, back from California, never really intended to. And divorces were processed rather quickly in that regard. And then women, because of the liberal divorce laws, California divorces really were unique in that respect. And really could be categorized as California divorces, but certainly there are people who came here for a variety of reasons, and certainly one of them was to marry and to divorce as well. I have a couple of questions. Gary, I wanted to find out more about, I was intrigued by all the description of the Fandangos, and I was wondering if there was more influence, what kind of influence the California's culture had on the general popular culture? Yeah, the California's is really kind of the sad story of what happened, one of the sad stories that happened in 19th century, the negative side of the hellacious formula. And the California's culture very much influenced the early American period, as it's called, which is from the early 1840s, in which the Fandangos, the dances, the social events were oftentimes a mixture of the California culture and the Americano, norte Americanos, they're called, coming together and sharing their different cultures. That happened quite frequently. And the Fandangos, the dances, definitely absolutely impacted the California Gold Rush period. There are references galore to Fandangos in the California Gold Rush period, but also the culture of the Californians in terms of cattle raising, of horse culture, in terms of early standards of gambling. For instance, the Californios were significant in the development of these, quote unquote, recreations, I guess you'd call them. And the culture continued to have an impact and still does up until this day. But politically and in social status, the Californios took a major hit in 19th century California. And particularly in political status did not really recover for a long time after that. I have also another question about, for your research, do you have a favorite politician that comes to mind in terms of their impact on the California, the state of California or politics or culture?  That's a great question. It's hard for me to use the word favorite because the whole tenor of this book was kind of the bad stuff. But there was one political event that has some real resonance today and I have it in the book in which there was a duel that took place between a newspaper editor and a politician in Sacramento. And the newspaper editor was named Gilbert. And the politician was named Denver and he was a state official. And Gilbert had written an editorial about the governor at the time, Governor Bigler and Denver didn't like it. And so he insulted the newspaper editor. One thing led to another typical 19th century California thing led to a duel. And outside of Sacramento, they had a duel with rifles. That was very common, pistols, rifles, rifle dueling. And most duels in the 19th century neither side wanted to shoot each other. It was just a test of honor. But the newspaper editor was very angry about this and insisted upon it being a serious duel. And Denver, the politician, killed the newspaper editor. He was never arrested. It was just part of how dueling worked in those days, the code of dueling. This is where the politician part comes. That's all preface to what I'm gonna talk. Now, Denver became an increasingly prominent politician and some years after this duel, he was chosen as the governor of Nebraska Territory. And out of Nebraska Territory was carved out Colorado Territory. And when Colorado became a state, this governor of Colorado Territory, they named the state capital after him. His name is James Denver. And Denver, Colorado is named after a politician who killed a newspaper editor in Sacramento in a duel. So those are the kinds of things that 19, just another quick one. It wasn't until, since I had talked about Lake Tahoe earlier, Lake Tahoe was not known as Lake Tahoe officially until 1945. Prior to that, it officially was known as Lake Bigler. And it was named after a, I think of the third governor of California, John Bigler, who I rescued some people in a snowstorm on the positive side and on the negative side. He was also an alcoholic and pretty corrupt. But Lake Tahoe was named Lake Bigler until 1945 when they finally changed the name to Lake Tahoe. That's, there's political shenanigans involved there too. There's one last question. It's from Gary Craig Moody. How has COVID impacted the post-publication activities of your book, book tours and things like that? Well, it had just eliminated it completely. I've, for my other books, I figured it out once. I think I've done 300 and something presentations on my other books over the years, including Mechanics Institute. And for books like mine, you really have to go out and meet the public and people want to meet you in historical societies and so forth. That's how you get the word out. That all ended. I had to go and every one of them got canceled. This, the one tonight is the first one that I've had, including Zoom presentations, were canceled because in many cases, the groups were not proficient with Zoom. And so those got canceled. This is the first one that I've done since June and since COVID hit. It's tremendous impact. And I miss it. I miss it a lot. The coolest part of doing this is greeting people and talking to people and hearing their stories because I learned so much from them that everybody's got a story in their local community that I just find fascinating. And so it's, I miss it, but it absolutely made your impact. Gary, could you repeat the name of that resource you mentioned, the California Digital. Is this a website or is it a, what is the name of it again? It's the California Digital Newspaper Collection. And it is a website. You go to it and it's all searchable. You put in anything, you know, for instance, if you want to see the actual article of the serpent that Isaac Coggin has, just write Lake Tahoe Serpent and it'll come up. And you can see the images and you can see the description. It's great and you can, it'll cut and paste it for you. It'll put it into text for you. It's a wonderful resource. And I use it all the time. I have a friend of mine who's writing a book about one of the Clatchies and who owns the Sacramento Bee, uses this all the time. Great resource, California Digital Newspaper Collection. It's cdnc.unr.edu, is that correct? That's it. Okay, excellent. Wonderful. Well, that's a great resource for anyone else who's doing any writing on California history or topics thereof. We're so pleased, Gary, to have you back and also to promote your fabulous book. It's written, as you said, it's storytelling, it's sassy, it's detailed, it's a great read. So everyone really encouraged you to purchase a book online, either at alexanderbook.com or at your local, through your local book vendors and just enjoy this wonderful reflection and description of our California history and also how there's so many parallels today. So once again, Gary, we all wish you all the best. Everyone be in good health, stay safe and we look forward to seeing you at our next programs. Check our website and we will greet you again. So good night, everyone. We'll just open for a minute to say our goodbyes. Thank you and happy new year. Everyone can unmute and just say goodbye if they want. Thank you very much. Good night, everyone. Thank you. You're awesome. Very interesting. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Great we live in. Thank you. Good to see everyone. You did it. Bye-bye. Okay, I'm going to go ahead and close the doors. Thank you so much, Gary. I definitely am going to look at that website. And so long. Thank you. Thank you.


You had a survey on Instagram that I found fascinating, and it asked your audience, do people know the real you? And half answered yes. How sad is that to you that only half answered yes? Do you know what the truth is? I'm not surprised. I feel like we've lived in a world that's constantly tried to get us to fit in. Like we were always told to fit in, stand in line. And then when you grow up, everything's like, oh, how do you stand out? And how do you, it makes no sense, right? I remember going to school and everyone was just like, stand in line, right? Fit in, like we're the same uniform. And then when you grow up, it's like personal branding, stand out, be yourself. And it's like, okay, so I'm not surprised that people don't know the real them because I think people are scared of being themselves because that may turn people off. Everything comes with connotations. We've been taught to be a certain way of what's normal and acceptable. All of those things. I remember the first time I wore robes on a street, right? It was like so scary. I was like, what if someone who knows me sees me? Like I'm gonna feel weird. And then you think about it and they're like, why? Like, you know, why do we think that?  So for me, the big, I'm not surprised by that is my first point. I don't feel surprised by it. And to those who answered no, what's your advice to them to allow people to see the real you to be more authentic? I think the first thing is you've got to get comfortable being you. See, no one will ever be comfortable with you being you if you're not comfortable being you. And I think we first try and prove ourselves to other people. So my favorite, this is like, I talk about this all the time. It's probably one of my favorite pieces of insights. It's from a writer named Cooley in the 1900s. And he said, today I'm not what I think I am. I'm not what you think I am. I am what I think you think I am. So what he means by that is we are living in a perception of a perception of ourself. If I think you guys think that I'm nice, then I feel nice. If I think that you think I'm weird, I feel weird. So we're constantly living through the perception of a perception of someone else. So my first thing is get away from that. Take that away, figure out how you feel about yourself. So I would say happiness is how you feel about yourself when you're by yourself. Right, like how do you feel about yourself when you're by yourself when no one else is around? And start there. When you mention that, of these perceptions, the first thing I was thinking is how exhausting, right? Did you want to know what you're thinking then what you're thinking of me and then now I'm going home? That just sounds like an exhaustive day. And we've been friends for 12 years. These thoughts never cross our mind. It doesn't happen around friends, right? When we're around the people that we have a relationship with already, we're not constantly second guessing ourselves and feeling inauthentic. But when we're around strangers and we're trying to impress them, instantly all of that self-doubt creeps in and all of a sudden we put up this facade. So one of the easiest ways for me to fake it until I make it as I'm working through this process of trying to get more comfortable as an introvert meeting more people and having to put myself out there is treat people like they're already your friend, right? Assume that they already like you, start there that we're already friends and then you don't have this inauthenticity that you're struggling with. I really like that. That's such a great tip. I love that. Yeah, and I think the other one is like just get comfortable being you and figuring out what that means. Like if you just observe when do you feel uncomfortable? So I found this, when I go to an event that I'm not speaking at that is not about what I do but I'm attending, I've observed that I prefer finding a one-to-one conversation in a corner and going really deep with someone rather than trying to mill around the popular circles and try and have and direct the conversation. It doesn't work for me. So now I can be myself by going, it's okay if I don't network at this event, if no one knows that I'm here, it's fine. I'm gonna go off and have a meaningful conversation with one or two people. When you know that, you just feel the pressure of yourself and you're just like, yeah, like, I can't be, you know. And then you can be, so it's just observing when you feel at your best and then figure out how to do that in each place. And that's gonna take testing and time.  And we've all been in that position. But you gotta do it once. You gotta do it once, you have to do it once. Yeah, exactly.


Tissue engineering and cell-based therapies offer promising solutions to treat bone defects caused by non-union or a vascular necrosis. These techniques involve the use of stem cells, biomaterials, growth factors, and mechanical stimulation to induce bone formation and repair. Stem cells, such as MSCs, ESCs, and IPSCs, can differentiate into osteoblasts and provide a scaffold for new bone formation. Biomaterials, such as ceramics, biopolymers, and composites, can be used to create a three-dimensional environment for stem cells to grow and proliferate. Growth factors and mechanical stimulation can further enhance the process of bone formation and repair. Clinically, these techniques have shown promise in treating non-union and AVN, but more research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these techniques and optimize them for maximum effectiveness. This article was authored by Jose R. Perez, Demetrius Corupis, Demetrius Corupis, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


All right, welcome to the February 27th, 2024 Aries Cloud Agent Python Maintainers meeting. Normal PRs and issues to talk about release 1.0, things going on that we're well aware of, adding support and ACAPI for it on creds, the out of band invitations that came up this week, and Ian's been working on that, and then the discussions and comments that are going into upgrading wallet types. So those are the topics for the day. If anyone has anything else, let me know, and we can hit those as we go. Reminder, this is a Linux Foundation and Hyperlegger Foundation meeting. So the antitrust policy of the Linux Foundation is in effect, as is the code of conduct of the Hyperlegger Foundation. So please follow that. Posted in the chat the information about the meeting. So feel free to jump in and edit PRs. I think we're pretty up to date on the PRs. Oh, that's a new one, but oh, open last week. Okay. That one will get updated.  But anyway, this is the W3C format. One, we've got the new exchange to peer related fixes. Be good to get those moved forward. I don't know if Daniel can hand them off to anybody. This is definitely not going to happen. I don't, yeah, this is not going to happen. The please act. So this will be closed soon. We've removed please act and retired the protocol in the Aries RFCs. So this will be closed with a reference to that. These two will be closed. And then the last one, Akif is now working on this did rotate protocol from the Akif from the BC Gov team. So we're working on that now and that will be completed. Might even have been completed yesterday. He was hopeful to have it finished. Daniel did a lot of the work. Akif had some additions to it and then test cases to write. So that was moving forward. And then these ones are likely to be closed. I would think although Daniel did work on that one. So pull requests are pretty up to date issues. The big ones are the upgrade. I haven't had a chance to re review those, but we'll talk about those a bit. These are documentation things. Eventually I'll ask someone to look at that one. It's pretty minor stuff, but nice to clean up. I don't think there's any of these we want to really look at. So I think we're okay to move on to the topics because the ones that are in here that we want to talk about are covered by the topics we're going to go through. So if I go back to the meeting, let's move release 1.0 down and do that at the end. Ian, did you have a meeting with the what's cooking folks yet or is that still being arranged? It's still being arranged. I had a discussion on Discord with the developer in Myanmar. All kinds of non hyperledger related difficulties in that kind of thing. Yeah. So they've got another developer they're bringing on the project and so they were going to schedule a meeting for Wednesday morning with everyone so that I could get an update. But then I got a text on Discord last night at 10pm asking if I wanted to join the developers meeting, but I was asleep by then. So hopefully we'll still be on. I'll follow up with them like first thing Wednesday morning. I'll just ping them and just make sure or I'll you know follow up and get a status. But it's been slow. The work has been slow on that one. One thing you want to do is encourage them to be ready for an Acapug presentation for next Tuesday if they can. Okay. So no matter where they are, I'd really appreciate it if they could come on and present where they are. Yeah, it looks like there's a couple of issues with the demo. I sent them a couple of updates that they need to make. I pointed out a couple of changes they need to make and then there were some other issues that I ran into. I'll try and work with them to make sure they get at least the demo working. Yeah. Okay. I'll include that in the instructions and just assume that. But if you could, yeah, it'd be great if you could arrange your meeting with them this week. Yeah. Okay. Oh, out of band invitation supporting peer dates and connection reuse. So I had kind of thought but wasn't sure that was supported. And so put in a topic to say, okay, let's make sure this works. And after looking at it for a bit, Ian's determined it is not supported. So Ian is working on that. There's an issue in that he's put and documented what he's working on. But to summarize it quickly, enabling creating peer dates that can be used in invitations, reusing the same peer did in all invitations, whether they be used single use or multi use invitations. And that is necessary to use did peer did types two or four is necessary in an out of band invitation to allow a invitee, the person receiving the invitation to find out and reuse the connection they already have. So you have to have a did that is fully resolvable as it did. So a did solve that is published on a ledger works and we've used that in the past, but a peer did type two or four is also a fully self contained did doc inside the did string. And so they work for connection reuse. So that's what Ian's adding support for. He's adding a way to bypass. So the default method would generally that you'd use the peer did two or four as the way to generate a peer did and use it for all invitations. But also adding a way to bypass that. So a an agent could choose to allow for separate ones if they want, not use reuse. And there's use cases for that of which Ian has worked on one in the past. And then and then working on the invitee side to make sure that reuse is enabled there by default. I think I think on the invitee side that everything should work. I think so. Yeah. But yeah, by tour side. First is to add support for creating did peer through the through the wallet did create endpoint, which right now the did peer to and did for doesn't work. And also, we're going to put a tag on or enable putting a tag on the did to specify which did is actually going to be used as the did for invites. And then just make integrate that into the event invitation. Okay. Okay. Thanks, Ian. Upgrading wallet types. So we've had a number of convert conversations here. So the specific issue we have right now is we have an ask our wallet type. And and we have an ask our and non creds wallet types, wallet type. And we want to enable a a occupy instance to upgrade from ask our to ask our and on creds. But we want to also give a tenant in a multi in a multi tenant occupy configuration, the ability to upgrade upgrade on their own time. So we don't have to run an occupy upgrade that upgrades all the wallets, because that will require all of the controllers simultaneously updating their code to use new endpoints. What we want to enable is allowing each tenant to choose when they want to upgrade, giving them a mechanism that they can indicate, okay, upgrade. And, and they would do that in a way that simultaneously updates their endpoints. So the scenario we envision is that a tenant controller will release a new version of their controller will scale down all of their old controller instances will start up new ones. In the new ones, there will be a upgrade wallet type command executed as part of the initialization. So an endpoint to do that that will trigger the batch operation that will update all of the all of the records necessary in the wallet, all of the relevant records, and then we'll proceed with using it and the new controller will use the new endpoints that are required when you go to ask our and on creds. So that should give every tenant full control over their upgrade. Ask our to ask our and on creds is the current use case. We do anticipate that at some point there will be another wallet type. So this is very similar to a version to version upgrade. But you know, and in a traditional app where you and upgrading a version requires updating the database in some way. In this case, the database upgrade is constrained to just upgrading data records. There's no change in the database schema or structure of the database. So no need to, you know, do anything like that. And, yeah, and, and as I say, it comes with an associated change in endpoints. So that's why we think this this will approach will work in and others comment on what I just said, did I cover it correctly? Yeah, so just there's two tickets that we've created. So the first ticket is just to make sure that the acupy can support both wallet types simultaneously. Because right now the way we initially did the non creds integration was when you start up acupy either with Ascar or Ascar non creds, it'll enable the appropriate endpoints. So we need for the multi tendency for all of the endpoints to be available. So that's what the first ticket describes is how the making sure that acupy can support that. And then the second ticket is the actual upgrade process, how the upgrade process is going to be built. And it needs to work for multi tendency, the way Steven described, but it also needs to work for a single tenant acupy as well. And just kind of related, like we have to think about this multi tendency upgrade anytime we do anything that is a breaking change. So in this case, you know, it's, it's fairly straightforward. We're creating new endpoints for the non creds. So, you know, the controller has to switch over to use the new endpoints. And then, you know, they do the upgrade when they, you know, when they do, when they do their update to the controller. But anytime there's a breaking change now, I think we need to evaluate. Yep. And I think this is really something we want to get finished for the 1.0 release. And it'll be a barrier to getting to 1.0. But being on 1.0 is also a benefit. So you're, we're doing a carrot and stick on this one, I think, which is helpful. So I think that's the plan here is we get all this work done in preparation for the 1.0 release. Does that sound right to anyone? Any comments? Okay. As far as the 1.0 release, we've got our flag. We still haven't had really the LTS discussion. And it's something I'll probably think about while I'm sitting in a cabin in the woods to try to go over exactly what that would mean. We have got this resolved. So this one is now resolved. That one is almost resolved. I guess that's to be completed. But we're pretty close to that. And then if I come back to issues, if we go to 1.0, so the biggest one that's a concern is this one. So we'll have to think about this one. I don't know if anyone, Shar, Alex, or Adam can talk to Daniel about what he suggests we do with this one. But this is, this one would be a good one to finish off. I know Daniel had that as a sort of a local branch that he was doing to make sure and running a bunch of tests. So he had an easy way to do it. Maybe if one of the three of you could talk to him about that and see if we could get someone to take that one over, at least understand how to do it and move it forward. Good. Thanks. Thanks, Shar. Akif, I don't know if you were there when I first talked about this. Any comments on did rotate at this point? You're on mute if you're speaking and if you're not. Sorry, my mic was frozen. I'm going to some changes up today and hopefully start getting the process going for getting some comments on that. Excellent. Good. So it's pretty close. You're happy with it? You think it's going to be an issue to finish or is it all right? I think it'll be fine. I do have a question just regarding the hang-up portion. I don't think it's too critical for the rest of the stuff, like the actual rotation part of it. Just in terms of the way it was written as the hang-up message takes a to-did and I'm not sure if the intention there was that to link it to the did that was initially you were trying to rotate to. So that was something I wanted to maybe ask Daniel about, but it's not documented in the RFC, so I don't know what the intention was there. I would say post it on Discord and I would talk to Sam about it because I think Sam did the did rotate. I'm pretty sure the intention of hang-up is to tell the other one, hey, I'm deleting your record, so I'm never going to be able to receive a message from you again. You can do what you want. Yeah, so I think in that context it wouldn't even matter if you sent it with the did that you were trying to rotate to because the intention is to just sever the connection altogether. Exactly. The intention is to sever the, you can confirm that with Sam, but yeah, that is definitely the intention of the hang-up. Okay, otherwise the rest of it is looking pretty good. Excellent. Good to hear. Okay. Okay, the last one that I realize will come up and I hesitate to ask because we just are still not completely finished defining and deciding exactly what to implement, but I think we're there for what pretty close for what we're going to do for upgrading. The next one we're going to have to consider from an anon creds is how to add a new did method. Creds supporting did method. We've not done that yet. We do have a potential offer from Hedera because they want to add one to Acropy, but that is another one we want to support, which is, yeah, another did method, another ledger basically. So one hopes that with the anon creds ledger agnostic there is a straightforward definition of how you do that, but as far as I know we have not tested that theory and so that will be the next thing that comes up. I don't know, Ian, if you have any comments, have you seen anything in that area yet? Have you taken a look at that? Well, the way that the new anon creds module is architected, it's got, I can't remember the term exactly, something like a plugin. So theoretically we should be able to do it, but I suspect we've got other touch points in the code, like just, for example, on the wallet create where we're creating dids in the wallet, it's got the hard-coded list of did types that support. So depending on how much support we want, there might be other places, but I think if, I mean, there might be some tinkering if we want to do it by a plugin, but I don't think for adding a new ledger and a new did type, I don't think it's going to be too onerous, but there's just might be some places in the code where we've got stuff hard-coded still. Yeah, okay. Okay, good. Okay, well that's starting that conversation. We're definitely going to have more to come on that one, so just be ready for that. Any comments from anyone else before we wrap up? We're just at the end of time. All right. Okay. Alex, while you're here, Acreta is working great, just so you know, we're continuing to use it in BCgov, certainly, and highly successful at running our tests and getting things done. We're adding a, the last one we're going to add is a verification test where you, in the initial setup, you get a credential, and then in the loop for each agent is just hammering on a verification to see how much we can hit a verification service. So what's that? Awesome. Okay. I heard that. Excellent. Okay. All right. Well, thanks all. That wraps up, and we'll see you at the AcrePug meeting next week, and we'll talk about probably some of these things. Again, if anyone has any topics they want to go over for the AcrePug meeting, let me know. Otherwise, have a great week. See ya.


we wanted to plot. Maybe we just want to focus on September 8th. And so before we can get into that, we need to create a new column. So if we create new columns in data frames, we just need to specify it within quotes and square brackets. And in particular, we're going to use the PD on to date time. And you can see it's telling me to click it. And what this does is it takes hours or it takes dates, and it takes time and combines them into a single date time object. And so in order to do that, we need to provide it what our date is. And then we tell it quote space quote. And then we tell it what our time is. And that space just allows the date time object to not have not have the time running against the date, but to space it out. And so if we look at the top five rows, we can now see that we've got this date time object, which is a combination of the date and the time. And additionally, if we look at the data types of our new data set, we can now see that date time is this special type of data called a date time object, which means that we can use it in Boolean or conditional statements to find dates that are greater than our date of interest or less than. And so to go ahead and get that data, we can create a new variable called solar subset in which we want the solar date time that is greater than 2021 September 08. And and we want similar data in which the date time is less than the ninth. And so what this will do is it will extract the data that is above the September 8 at midnight. But before September 9 the midnight, so we'll effectively get all 24 hours of September 8. And then we don't really need all of the subset. So I'm going to extract a few columns. So we want, we still want all the rules, but we really only want, well to show you, we can really just extract date time and produced kilowatt hour. And so I forgot this print statement here. And so there is how we could extract just the date time and just the produced kilowatt hour. But it's not necessary because we can always just call out specific values within our ggplot. So this is what our new data set looks like and we can see that now it's just September 8. So then we can create our line plot. So we can say ggplot with the subset of data because we're just plotting the 8th at this point. And we can say geomline aes x equals date time as before and y equals produced kilowatt hour. And so here we can see that this is looking a lot better. We can see that this is the early hours of September 8. This is the late hours. We can see that it's spiked sometime in the middle of the day as solar power is likely to do. But we can improve how this looks. I'm just going to copy it, paste it down here. And we can use the theme command as we did with the box plots early on to actually change this axis. So we can say axis text x. And now before we said element blank because we were removing it, but in this case we're changing it. So we say element underscore text and we tell it what we're changing. And so we can just change the angle to 90. And so now we can see that this is a little bit more readable and we can see that this spike happens. It hasn't attached the time to it so it's not terribly useful because it's cut off that little bit. But we could assume that if the time was here it would be an even better representation.


Well, perhaps one reason why I was asked to participate here is that we have been doing a undiagnosed disease program at UAB outside the network and prior, actually, to the existence of the network. So maybe there are some lessons in terms of how this can be scaled into a non-NIH-funded environment. It happened because I was the chair of an external advisory committee to the UDP in its early days, so I was exposed to it and had some opportunity to learn how it works. Invited Bill to UAB, he met with the CEO of our health system and the dean. They bought it as something that was the right thing to do and a good thing to do, and we've gotten about $200,000 a year for the past four years from our institution to move this forward. We view it as a clinical program. Obviously, it's not funded as a research program. We, and I mean by that all the various consultants, bill for our services in the traditional way, but we do have some money to grease the wheels, which is where that funding is used. In part, to hire nurse practitioners, this is the announcement about the program, but here are the players besides myself, two physicians who dedicate a small amount of their effort to full-time nurse practitioners, that's where a lot of the money goes, and they're the ones really that are the kind of engine of the program because much of what we end up doing, as you'll see, is to facilitate workups and to make it easy for consultants to get engaged, and that's really what the nurses largely accomplish, and we have a genetic counselor who also dedicates Potter for Time. We have a whole cadre of consultants, both in the adult and pediatric world, none of them are paid anything to participate in this program. They do bill for their services, like any other, and they agree to prioritize patients and to try to coordinate all of our workups, our outpatient workups. We don't bring people in, obviously we don't have the funding to make that possible, but it works reasonably well and why they stay engaged is because it's really, really interesting, I think. We have meetings that occur that, by the way, graduate students and genetics trainees attend as well as even some basic scientists, and they're just fascinating meetings. You see all of medicine unraveled in front of you when you hear the different consultants go back and forth about what could possibly be going on with this patient, and although it's not a basic science program, it does stimulate people to take things back with them, and that's, in my mind, one of the major goals of this program. So here are some numbers, they're not that up to date, so we haven't actually compiled them in the last, say, six months, but I would guess that we are at about 250 referrals at this point, and many of the workups were still in progress, but we actually have made diagnoses that have changed the course of treatment for patients. So if you ask the question, which I think is important if you're going to define mission and think about where it's going, so what's the soul of the program? So I didn't think of this as, you know, we're successful if we can cure somebody. That's, in my mind, that's the job of the NIH altogether, not anyone institute or anyone program. I saw this program as an engine of diagnosis that would take mysteries and solve them, and that would be the point from which the entire community could get involved to try to understand now what can we do about this. But I always thought, and I came to this conclusion when I was involved in that external advisory committee sitting in on some of the meetings here, that this was very much old-fashioned medicine, the part of medicine that, sadly, has gone by the wayside, which is that doctors listen to their patients and talk to each other, two things that happen very little these days in the pressured environment of day-to-day medicine, but then wedded to modern medicine and all the various genomic approaches and so forth. And so I saw the UDP almost as backstopping a dysfunctional healthcare system and providing something for patients who were desperate, largely because people really just weren't mobilized to use the tools that actually were at their disposal to help them. So in thinking about scalability and sustainability, just a few comments, some of which are connected to things other people have said all day. The role of sequencing, without question, that's been the most powerful tool at our disposal in terms of making diagnoses. And I'll be the first to advocate for good quality phenotyping. However, I will admit to you that there are times when we made a diagnosis by sequencing, and you sort of kick yourself that either you didn't think of the thing because it wasn't a new discovery. It was just a very rare condition presenting in a somewhat atypical way. And the honest truth is if I had done nothing at all other than sequence, then I would have come to the same answer. And we're going to see a lot of that, and that's why I was saying before, we really need to look carefully at process. What's the shortest distance to the answer? The answer being not the cure, but what the underlying pathophysiology is. And the network that's been set up to help facilitate functional validation is, I think, of huge value. And certainly, we would love to have access to that just as I'm sure many others in the community. The point I made earlier about lessons that are learned about how to do this most efficiently. In my mind, it's certainly not my field, but somebody who's an expert on process management ought to be looking in and asking the question, how efficiently can you do this? Because if it will be scalable, it will be because it gets to be more efficient. The idea of push diagnosis occurred to me, I guess, at one point when we made a diagnosis, and this I'm sure happens to all of you, that in a million years we wouldn't have made except by sequencing. It was nowhere on anybody's differential diagnosis. However, when you looked at the, in this case, it was an MRI of a young child, it wasn't that unfamiliar a picture. And the question is, how many other kids out there are out there who have the same condition and the same MRI? And the reason it's never been diagnosed is sequencing is new. It hasn't been used all that widely so far. And nobody would ever have thought of this gene until very recently, and probably even not to this day. Can we be coming up with tools to go back into radiology and saying, how many more Pantocerebellar atrophy patients do you have in infancy, which is what this was, that we could be asking this about? So every time you make a diagnosis, yes, maybe these are ultra rare, and some of them probably are. Some of them are probably just rare, and nobody ever thinks of them because they don't really surface as well-defined syndrome. So I'll bet you you'll find many more diagnoses if you could push this out rather than wait for the patients to come to you. We have, I think, productively partnered with what we call the Center for Clinical and Translational Science at UAB. And that's been, I think, a good way for us to reach both the clinical and also the clinical investigation community. And surely that network is one that could be captured to facilitate the expansion of this. We worry a lot about underserved communities. It takes a fair amount of sophistication, nevermind health insurance, to know that there even exists this kind of resource. And I think there are a lot of folks out there who don't have that sophistication, don't have a physician whom they can push to refer them. And I think there's a lot of need to try to reach underserved communities, which is something we're focusing more on now. We've heard a lot about patient networks and mobilizing them. And I'll also just mention the possibility of professional networks, including perhaps various of the professional societies, who I think would find it really fascinating to get involved in thinking through how to take the expertise that they have access to and mobilize it in this way. So in conclusion, really, I think this is scalable. It is not inexpensive. Why did UAB put money into it? I think the answer was in part because they knew, based on the experience at the NIH program, that it would have a kind of halo effect, that patients would benefit from this. And it would be something that they could point to as something that they'd really contributed to the community. And I don't think that uniquely motivated in that way. And when kind of approached in the right way, be surprised what you can make happen.


Everybody forced here ripping three basketball boxes for Scott f big ones for Scott. You got two obsidian basketball from 21 22 And from the same year as a prison first off the line Heck yeah, man. Good luck scholars. He's some big shimmers in that prison box, but first let's see Big rookies in the obsidian as well.  You go Evan Mobley on the rookie Jersey auto Out of obsidian 21 of 99 on them on the Mobley Congrats Scott first box with a banger. We got blue flood carl Anthony Towns That's awesome. Almost a T-wolves color match and a Mobley magnitude as well number 10 99 Wow, dude Good good first box. All right three base Dominique Wilkins Yana sent to the Combo and Kemba Walker Got a Celtics auto here Robert Williams the third Galaxy autos numbered 43 of 149 and a worm 47075 on the galaxy auto Dennis Rodman Yeah, Cleveland's gonna be an interesting team 100% We got Ray Allen Sonic's purple numbered 3 of 99 and a magnitude Paul George Orange numbered 31 of 35 Prism first off the line time Alright, we got to manifest those big shimmers Silver and Irland's Noel Silver prismatic James Harden as they live hers Daniel Tice four of ten on the gold shimmer Daniel Tice Nice color looking for a better name there, but I assume it would have been sick orange nowara 44 49 and Chris Duarte on the sensational signatures rookie on it nice Duarte Jared Butler Definitely would love to see a better shimmer next time Right color down silver Killian Hayes pistons red Jada McDaniels Number 21 of 299 Sharif Cooper Pulsar Dwayne Wade rookie hyper JT Thor Moses Moody rookie base card and a great round the third Silver Devin Vacelle next up is a hyper shake Milton Prismatic Booker Scotty Barnes rookie base and a Kaminga rookie base Wow Big card gold shimmer rookie Moses Moody Congrats Scott That is absolutely gorgeous 10 out of 10 That's more like it with the gold shimmer Beautiful color match That's awesome man Big card We will get that mag absolutely Got blue ice Gordon Hayward 112 of 125 Cameron Thomas base Wow that was awesome That yes I am gills that's correct Ruby wave Keldon Johnson Purple eyes Kyle Anderson Number 124 of 149 Isaiah Jackson I don't think I ever have wild Yeah this gills guy he's a Big intellect Silver Chris Paul How do you know that? He knows nobody really well yeah Purple Ben Simmons 95 out of 99 You're gonna be like the guy that won the eight leg Parley in the championship Davion Mitchell rookie base Do you guys see that? Guy won an eight leg Parley he predicted every Champions League game down to the score today Want a good chunk of change on fan duel Ruby wave Kam Reddish Hyper Daniel Tice His name was gills 311 Gills 311 is that you that won the 10k? Got a Kade Cunningham Pierce Isaiah Todd Good band Austin Reeves you got Silver Rudy Gay Is a widescreen Silver Zion Williamson The auto is a Nimesh Keita Rookie Silver Auto Kings Rookie there Nimesh Keita Book Knight Rookie Base Ruba 37 I saw Incubus Sugar Ray Wow Some band names right there man Sugar Ray good lord Ruby wave Sharif Cooper Nice color match there Blue Rookie Sancho Mamacalashvili Number 37 of 199 Got Silver Jalen Brunson Hyper Rookie Trayman Eve 6 oh boy Eve 6 oh my god goodness Alright that'll do it Congrats on the Gold Shimmer Moses Moody Scott and the Mobley Jersey Auto We'll get those right out to you


This study examined the spatial variations in the relationship between landslide susceptibility and its explanatory factors in Nianshan, China. It compared the performance of geographical random forest, GRF, against random forest, RF models, finding that GRF achieved a higher accuracy with an area under the curve AUC of 0.86 as it considered the spatial heterogeneity among variables. Additionally, the local feature importance derived from GRF allowed researchers to identify the impact of conditioning factors varied across space, providing implications for policy development by local governments to focus on different conditioning factors in specific counties to prevent and mitigate landslides. Furthermore, the study used spatial cross-validation, SEV, to evaluate the model performance, which addressed the over-optimism bias in model error evaluation. This article was authored by Xiaoyang Dai, Yuncheng Zhu, Kai Sun, and others.


I think that should be your mission statement that you want to personally touch voice to voice as many property owners as you can so that you'll own the market share because it doesn't matter how many listings you have or how many transactions you do compared to the rest of the market. Market share is how many real relationships you have with property owners because that agent is going to do all the future business. Hey, what's up everybody? Ricky here. So I just had an incredible phone call with an agent in Pennsylvania. He's I think he said he's seven years in the business four or seven. I can't remember how many years, but it was an incredible phone call. I'm going to share it with you here in a minute, but the phone call came from the three to one club that I created. It's an Instagram club three to one club stands for have no fear three to one.  You get scared. You got that those butterflies in your stomach. You say to yourself three to one and then just do it. For example, making phone calls, right? Everybody's scared to make phone calls.  But you just freeze. You just can't seem to get your finger to push the button. So dial the phone number or get the dialer started. But you know this is what's going to make you successful. You say to yourself three to one and then hit the button and start calling. So that's what the three to one club is all about to overcome your fears. And I started this on Instagram and after this phone call I'm about to share with you. I'll give you the details on how to be a part of the three to one club where you can win conversations with me, phone calls. I'll call you. You may win a free copy of one of my books and along with all other kind of prizes I'm giving away. So enjoy the call and I'll talk to you afterward. Hey, what's up buddy? It's Ricky Carruth. Good. How about you, man? I'm doing fine. How about you? You're located. Nice. Nice. How long you've been in real estate? Nice. Nice. Yeah, for sure, man. So I'm just I'm about to pull up to a to a meeting. But I wanted to give you a quick shout and just see if you had like a real quick like specific question or something that I could I could really bring you a lot of value really quick. Yeah, I mean, here's the thing, dude. There's no right or wrong answer, right? Like everything works. But at the end of the day, you have to figure out what works best for you and see, you know, certain things that you do may only plateau you like you may only do so good at certain things. But there's going to be other activities that will actually you can see exponential growth in your business. And for me, for me, I mean, it's just a lot of people do really well with online leads and stuff. But I think that's more like team leaders that that have a system lined up so they can feed their team they can feed their team members.  So why not do what's the most effective and most efficient, which to me is property owners cold calling property owners, because those people control the market share whoever whatever agent has the most relationships, real voice to voice lifelong relationships with property owners owns the market share. And so I think you should be I think you should be on a huge mission to just dominate as far as being the agent that has the most lifelong relationships in place with the most property owners in your area. I think that should be your mission statement that you want to personally touch voice to voice as many property owners as you can so that you'll own the market share because it doesn't matter how many listings you have or how many transactions you do compared to the rest of the market. Market share is how many real relationships you have with property owners, because that agent is going to do all the future business, the most future business. You know, we trade stocks, we trade stocks on future earnings of companies. So I trade market share on future deals of agents and future deals of agents is how many relationships they have with property owners who are going to be buying and selling. A lot of people look at owners as just sellers, but that's your source of buyers. And that's why in my phone scripts, that's why I don't say do you want to buy or sell or do you want to sell? You thought about selling. I say, hey, I don't want to take it too much of your time today, but a house over there close to you just sold and I didn't know if there's anything I could do to help you. You know, I don't really ask them if they want to buy or sell because I don't know which one they want to do. And it emphasizes the fact that I want to help them. And then from there, it's like, wow, this guy is different. Man, I think I can really get behind this guy. Sure. Sure. Are you collecting email addresses? Yes. Yeah, email, create a huge database, send a weekly email every single week on the same day forever. I've sent mine every Wednesday since 2007. 11 years every Wednesday.  This is our guy, you know, that that email builds the relationship for you and does all the hard work for you. While you can just continue calling new people and trying to put more deals together. No, that's true. I love it.  If you go there, there's free training. There's ebooks. There's webinar. There's the Facebook group you can join. You can find my YouTube there. You can find I have I wrote two books you can buy on Amazon that are there.  Oh, I definitely will. I definitely will. I appreciate the phone call. Yeah, man. I got a role but it was really good to talk to you man. Let's stay in touch. Absolutely. I appreciate it. Okay, buddy. See you. So I thought that was a pretty incredible call. So if you want to be part of the three to one club, this is what you do. Okay, you go to my Instagram account at Ricky Caruth. You follow me.  Okay, you do this for all of my posts for your chances to win a phone call with me where you can ask me any question you want. Free books. I'll sign them and mail them to you along with all kinds of other prizes I'm giving away. So join the three to one club overcome your fears and be great today tomorrow and forever. Do it for yourself. Do it for your friends. Do it for your family. We'll talk to you guys real soon.