I wanna talk about how long ago this happened. This happened obviously in the early part of 2000, over 20 years ago, or 20 years ago. But that's just so long, where that makes no sense. Why would we even bring that up? That's gotta be that woman, Julie Roy. She's bringing it up, right? She has to, she's out here. She's got a bullseye. She's got a dartboard with John MacArthur's face in the middle of on the bullseye. She's got a vendetta against him. She has a desire. She's got to ax the grind, and she wants to grind it in John MacArthur's back. Well, let's just for the sake of this, say it's true. Let's say it's true. Now I'm not saying it's true. I'm not saying it's false. Again, I've never spoke with Julie Roy's. I've seen a couple of the interviews, and I did see this past weekend's interview when she was on Sacred Woods broadcast, and I know she also did one with Ruslan. I didn't find her to be not credible. Now, I did say that the time on the lavish lifestyle of him or the prosperous life, I didn't see the issue there. I didn't. I thought that maybe she might've been searching for a story, but she might've been right. I could be wrong, but I'm trying to be fair here. I'm not trying to get into her mind and look into her heart and see her motives. I don't know. But let's say for the sake of everyone who wants to impugn her integrity. Let's say she is wrong. Does that mean the story's wrong? So there are times where even a person with bad motives makes an accusation against you and the person is correct. So that doesn't absolve you of your issue, your role. So let's put that aside, guys. We're gonna judge what was stated and then go with that. First of all, if Julie Roy's motives are your defense, you have no defense. I wouldn't care if Julie Roy's right now is in a car at a stakeout outside of John McCarthy's house. That would not excuse him of any wrongdoing. Get away from the fact that the person who brought this to light, because what we did not do is once the secular community got a hold of what Ravi Zacharias did or what Karl Lentz did or Eddie Long did, why do you think CNN is running this about Eddie Long? Why are they talking about Ravi Zacharias? We didn't impugn their motives. And so don't do the same for her. Now, I don't know anything about Julie Roy's. I don't know if she's doctrinally sound. I don't know if she's a heretic. I don't know anything about, I don't know if she's the most godly woman on the planet. I do not know. We really expect the pastors and the church, even though we don't think that they should. We actually do expect them to make, yeah, and Julie Roy's, she does have an ax to grind. That doesn't necessarily mean that what she said was true. I mean, or was true or false, actually. Am I a fan of Joe, am I a fan of Julie Roy's? No, I think she clearly has an ax to grind. Does that mean that what she says is wrong? Everything that she says is wrong? No, I don't think that, I don't think so either. But now, do I think that her doctor clearly not? I understand that something happened some time ago. Right. But there are consequences of sin and there is no statute of limitations to the consequences of sin. As a matter of fact, oftentimes when God deals with us for our sins, it's not immediate. Right. It's usually after the second time, the fifth time, four years later, five, it doesn't matter. Right. But you cannot hold other folks accountable, like you said, the Carl Linces of the Worlds, the Ravi Zacharias of the World, and people who, and I don't know that he did specifically, but other people have held, let's say Brian Houston, responsible for not reporting what his father did. Right. At least Brian Houston didn't put somebody out to the wolves.  God bless Eileen Graham. Yeah. That is, if what, and I'm saying if, I don't know, if what Julie says is true, and I have no reason to believe, but if she said, what she said is true, that's an awesome woman. That is the way she handled things. That is an awesome woman. If what Julie Roy said is true, every single person on the elderboard, and I guess one was a pastor now, you got to go. Absolutely. Yeah, I think so. Absolutely. John MacArthur, if what was said is true, yeah, and there is no other side of the story, even if John MacArthur did not know, even if what she said is true, you didn't meet with the woman, that's bad. Right. And if you did not know, that's bad. No, if what she said is true, you have to go. Let's just see, is he qualified? Let's see, because this isn't your qualified day one, and then going into year two, you don't have to worry about it. You've already overcome that barrier, that hurdle. 10 years later, you don't have to worry about being qualified. No, this is what you have to be at all times. That pastor is going to have to give an account for what is happening in that church. Is he at fault for all of that that's going on? But if something is rampant, then we've got a problem. If something is rampant, then we have a problem. With MacArthur, and we'll deal with one of the issues that I know people want to talk about, but in over 50 years, spread out, it seems like, it seems like that the level of scandal is less at least compared to most other pastors over 50 years. Have you ever seen or heard of a story of someone being prosecuted and everyone thought the person was guilty? Everybody thought the person was guilty. Everybody, by all accounts, all the evidence stacked up and this person was guilty. This person was wrong off with his head. Come to find out, wow, we made a mistake. So be careful, you might be right. You might be right. And even if you are right, I still say, in some of those things, it still may not disqualify him. I don't think it does. That's just me. Do you see that on the screen? Yeah. Okay, read that statement for me there. Read that statement. Every reformed believer on YouTube, join me in demanding that. Read it again, sir. Take two. Read it again. Asking that every reformed believer on YouTube, join me in demanding that John McCrudden step down. When did he make that statement? In 2022, after the story broke, after he heard all the facts, after all the information, the same reports that we got, he got. Okay. Same reports. But in fact, it's in the same video, it's in the same video of the clips that I just played. All right.  He got to get out of here. 20, 20 seconds. Facts, facts. 2023, he's saying, what exactly is he saying right to the second? That John MacArthur should not have to step down, that he's not disqualified from being a pastor now. John MacArthur writes a letter to the little girl, telling the little girl her name is Wendy Guay. Tell him to read that. Okay, so now, notice this.  So that's one of the things I did look into. Because I think you may have put a picture of the letter up or something. I was like, I'll do it. I did. When I read it, and it was hard to read. Some of it was, I couldn't make all of it out. Right, it was a little grainy, little grainy. Okay, so I couldn't make every word out.  I wasn't clear. Yes, absolutely. Yes, yes, she could, yes, yes. I didn't see that in the... The father admitted it. The father admitted it. The 79 dude? The 79 dude admitted it, yes. It's a sexually assaulting his daughter and they kept him in the church. Yes. Come on, Doug. I'm very disappointed. And you know Corey's seen all this? Yeah, he's seen it. Oh, yeah. I know for a fact he's seen it. Everybody's seen it and then knows about the story. Even the people in the comments, they've seen it. Everybody's seen it. On this channel, I know they've seen it. Over here, and Corey's seen it, too. Corey's bugging right here. If he's seen that, but if Corey has seen all this right here. Yes. He's out of pocket with supporting Mr. MacArthur. He's out of pocket there. And Corey wants to be a pastor. I'm very saddened, bruh. I'm very saddened, bruh. I'm saddened. As we all should be. As we all should be. Multiple, multiple. Absolutely. Absolutely. Multiple things here. I'm really, I'm really stuck because, I mean, I saw stuck, my mind is like, right now, my whole thing was to ask the grind state. That was my thing. I didn't dive all the way deep like on this right here. And now that I'm looking at this stuff, and I am gonna go back and read the statement and do all that stuff. And I don't understand how Corey could support a man who was, who allowed that to go on. Corey has made the comment publicly that public sin does not require, I mean, public sin does not require public repentance.  The lie is straight from the pit. And I'm about to show you biblically, biblically. In two passages of scripture, we've always read it, but it seems like we forget because of personality instead of the precepts of the word of God instead of scripture. So let's do this. And I believe this is the spirit of God, you know, that's taking control over this live regarding this situation. Because I was pretty much done after that last clip, but I wanna make sure we're clear that you're clear most importantly, Daryl, and then others who are watching this, and I'm going on record and I'm challenging Corey to make this right. Because that's twisting the scripture to say that public sin does not require public repentance because in actual fact, it does. Matthew chapter 18, let's go there. Matthew chapter 18, we all know the text. We're gonna go to one of them. Matthew 18 verse 15 through 17. All right, Matthew chapter 18 verse 15. It says, if your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private. Notice, go and show him his fault in private.  Verse 16, but if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you so that by the mouth of two or three witnesses, every fact may be confirmed. Verse 17, if he refuses to listen to them, so it was private, semi-private, and now it's going public, verse 17. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. So now, the question you have to ask yourself is this. How is it that he is put out of the church as communicated if he doesn't repent? That's the first question, right? That's the first question.  Be clear of the names you're talking about. The person that refuses, yeah. The person that refuses to repent, okay? He or she is put out of the church because they refuse to repent over a clear sin, okay? You're right. I was gonna bring this first up to you. I was gonna bring this to you in defense of Corey, but the reality is I can't cause he's in clear sin. So how did this person now that's put out of the church, how are they allowed to come back into the church? Answer, there must be public confession and repentance in order for biblical restoration to, let's go to the second one. This one is in First Corinthians chapter five, First Corinthians chapter five. Paul Rice is actually reported that there's immorality among you and an immorality of such a kind that does not exist even among the Gentiles that someone has his father's wife.  Okay, so we all know the story. So let's go down. This is go down. Verse five, verse four rather, in the name of our Lord Jesus, he says, when you are assembled, now this is public, it needs to be dealt with publicly. In the name of our Lord Jesus, when you are assembled and not with you in spirit, with the power of the Lord Jesus, I have decided to deliver such a wanted Satan for the destruction of his flesh so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. Your boasting is not good. Do you not know a little Levin? Levin's the whole lump of dough? He's given a command. Clean out the old Levin that you may be a new lump just as you are in fact, unleavened for Christ our Passover also has been sacrificed. Therefore, let us celebrate the feast now with old Levin. Know with the Levin of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. Verse nine, I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people. I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world or with the covetous and in swindlers or with idolaters. For then you would have to go out of the world but actually I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called pseudoideal fos so-called brother. If he isn't immoral person or covetous or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or a swindler not even to eat with such a one. For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church but those who are outside God judges. Notice verse 13, the B clause. Remove the wicked. He didn't just say remove the man. No, he called this person sin wickedness. Remove the wicked man from among you. Put them out. Now, how are they brought back in? Second Corinthians chapter two. Cory, you're in the chat. You can have to explain this, bro. The Corinthians church puts the man out, right? Paul writes the church in the second letter in his second epistle about the same sinning brother. The church now puts church discipline on him inflicts church discipline, but now it's enough. Paul is telling, okay, it's enough. Fall back, y'all. It's enough, it's enough. He's repentant. How do we know? Verse one. But I determined this for my own sake that you would not come to you in sorrow again. For if I cause you sorrow, who then makes me glad but the one whom I may sorrow for?  For out of much affliction and anguish of heart, I wrote you, I wrote you with many tears not that you will be made sorrowful but that you might know the love which I have especially for you. But if any has caused sorrow, he has caused sorrow not to me but in some degree in order not to say too much to all of you. Sufficient, verse six. Sufficient for such a one is this punishment which was inflicted by the majority so that on the contrary, you should rather forgive and comfort him. Otherwise, such a one might be overwhelmed by excessive sorrow. Wherefore, I urge you to reaffirm your love for him. For to this end, I wrote so that I might put you to the test whether you are obedient in all things. But one whom you forgive anything, I forgive also. For indeed what I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything, I did it for your sakes and the presence of Christ so that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan for we are not ignorant of his schemes. And you got first Timothy five, which actually Corey even cited that text in his video in 2022 about the sinning elder. If the sinning elder refuses to repent, he says they're here to be rebuked in the presence of all so that the rest would not sin. That's what Corey said. He flip-flopped on this on something. Corey, if you there, you made a statement. Dad, you better be right. If you coming at somebody, you better be right. That's what you were saying. And I agree with that. I agree that you should be right if you're gonna come at somebody, right? I mean, that would only make sense to go at somebody with all the facts and know that you're right, right? How do you explain the written confession? How do you explain that?  You would be better to say that. The obvious evidence is there than to say support him because he's allowing pedophiles, written confessions in his church, bro. Written confessions. You can't support somebody who's allowing pedophiles to be in his church and lead the church. You can't support that man, bro, and be able to defend yourself, biblically, morally, in any way. But when a man admits to touching a daughter and to preach it, okays it, tells old girl, chill out, you're good. We're gonna keep letting, bro. You have no defense, homie. None, with this particular situation, you have no defense. You can't say, you can't say you're not sure. You can't because you have the man admitting to doing it and then you have MacArthur saying he's good. So you cannot sadly, sir, because this hurts me to tell you, you can't defend a man. You were wrong for coming out saying you're in support of a man who's allowed a young lady to go back into the danger zone of her own father. Just because you spent time in prison does not mean you can ignore this here. You can't. You can't, and you can't, and then you can't support the man that's supporting them, bro, my heart, Corey. Now he just flipped this year. He just flipped this year. He just flipped last month. He flipped last month. So since he's flipped. How? So a month ago, every time you lose in support, bro, and I will say this, the people that are supporting you, you almost got to question them. Bro. Bro. So the people that are supporting your ministry, whatever you got going on, you got to question them. You got to question them hard. So the people you got following, are they really good Christians? Holy, you know, believers? Are they? How can you say they are?  I mean, fam, you gotta get on this now, though. The question was asked, would you allow your daughter, would you go to Grace Community Church, excuse me, if Eileen grilled your daughter? Now, for the record, bro, do you have any girls? Yes, sir, two of them. How many girls you got? Two. Two. Would you allow your daughters to go to Grace Community Church, knowing what they've done, knowing what Mark Arthur has done? With the evidence out there? No, of course not. Of course not. And if Mr. Corey knew that evidence, and he did, then he ain't making much sense to me. He's not making any sense to me on that. See, when he made that statement, right? I even got notes on it. I understood what he was saying. I understood his point and my thoughts on it was, according to way I've been listening to him, things he's said in the past, I know he wouldn't tolerate that. But now, if you've read the confession, which y'all say he did a year ago, if you've read the confession, you're lost, sir, on this one. You're losing. You're losing. You're losing. I know he felt like he was clear. I know he felt like the benefit of the doubt was, of course I wouldn't allow Mark. I understand, and I understood it at the time. But if you were privy to that info, fam, you shouldn't have been defending MacArthur on anything at that point. On anything. I pray, Mr. Corey, you explain yourself, bro. I pray that you, man, because you hurt my heart, bro. Well, I'm hurt from all these people defending the situation. It ain't just Corey, I'm hurt. I'm hurt about everything. Wow. He hurt my heart. He hurt my heart with this. Yeah. With two kids in the Jeffco school system, Stephanie's school he ran for and won a school board seat in 2019. Right before things got ugly. I did not anticipate that happening. And it was, it was a surprise to me. This summer, schoolie and other board members got this anonymous letter, which included a picture of her home. We live in your community, said the letter. We are not concerned with the efficacy of masks or vaccines. Only the rights of Jeffco parents to send their children to school while choosing for themselves what's best for their families. The writer urged schoolie to change Jeffco's school mask policy. We expect you to stand up for our rights. Please do the right thing. The intention was to intimidate and to make me feel unsafe and scared. And what we then find is we get these letters if we had no idea. So from now on, you now know it needs to stop. At a subsequent board meeting, schoolie broke down about what she called a veiled threat. Please leave my family out of this. A police investigation was launched to find out who was behind the letters and if they broke the law. It's gone too far. Who wrote those letters? Oh, I wrote those letters. Yeah, that was me. You wrote those letters? Yep. It was apparently fingerprints on the letters that led investigators to David Morrill, a parent and anti-mask advocate who explained to me why he sent unsigned letters. So it wasn't just me. I didn't want them to think that I was just speaking for myself. What were you trying to prove by taking pictures of their house and then sending them pictures of their own homes? Well, again, that we all live in the same neighborhood, but I was actually there, that I cared enough to want to speak to them personally. Morrill acknowledges he never spoke to a single board member in person at their homes. You don't see going to the school board members' homes and taking pictures of their homes and sending those to them as being over the line or a bit of an invasion. No, no, I don't think so. I certainly didn't see it that way at the time. It's unfortunate that they feel that way. Tony, if you remove the wife's testimony from Julie Roy's article, the article doesn't exist, it vaporizes. Like 90% of her article is the testimony of the wife, which I'm not necessarily saying is true or untrue, but she characterizes it like this is a established fact that anybody can go back and say, well, duh, of course we need this, we can't, we don't know. Apparently a jury found the wife's testimony on some things to be compelling. Right, and that's part of what I'm gonna fill you in on here. If we're innocent until proven guilty, then we can assume that he's guilty, I think, right? Can't we? I mean, we can assume that. Yeah, because nobody ever has a conviction overturned, do they? That's what they said, like, you know, well, yeah, OJ was found innocent, so I guess he must not have done it, right? It's provable fact now. It's like, okay, let's not get out over our skis, but she leaves out a couple of important things. Number one, the husband maintains his innocence on the sex abuse charges. To this day, he says, I didn't do that. And there was no physical evidence that he did. That was another part of the red flag for me was there's no evidence of this. And I realize it in a lot of these kind of cases, you know, especially when the accusations come to light with children years down the road, there can't be any physical evidence. But it's something that readers probably should have been aware of. The other part of this, other than him saying, it's something that women and mothers should be aware of. Yeah.  It's the mom's fault that this happened if this actually happened, because that's the mom's role, is to protect the kids. Right, how did she not know? I don't know. I mean, I don't want to re-ajudicate, but she definitely bears some responsibility. There's some patriarchy for you, lady. I'm not going to call out the other channels who had come to the defense. I love MacArthur. I'm not going to call out other people who have not. They've had everything else to say about everybody else. They've talked about all the low-hanging fruits, the heretics. You can talk about Marcus Ryder's all day long and be right. You can pretty much say, hey, you know what? Marcus Ryder's doesn't wash his hands and you'd probably be right. That's how we do it. But again, someone who's like, yeah, this guy's, this ain't Marcus Ryder's we're talking about. Then what are you going to do? And so guys, that's our issue. That's our issue. Who do you follow? Do you follow Paul? Do you follow Barnabas? Do you follow Paulus? Do you follow John MacArthur? Or do you follow Christ? That's you on tape. You really broke my heart, though. Real talk. You broke my heart. You broke my heart. Hello, everybody. Welcome to the BCV channel. I am your host, Pastor Seco Woods. Please do the following. Please like, subscribe, share, hit the notification bell at the bottom of this video. That way, whenever I go live and post any content, you'd be one of the first to view it. Also, if you'd like to support this ministry financially, you can do so by clicking the donation links below at the bottom of the video. Thank you so much. Those of you who have been consistent and faithful and making the BCV channel and Love, Life, and Marriage with the Woods a part of your regular support and giving. If you'd like to be a body lifer and thank you to those of you who have chosen and have decided to become a body lifer, I do appreciate that. We thank you so much. But body lifers are those who decide to make this ministry and Love, Life, and Marriage with the Woods. A part of their regular giving. And so there's no obligation. Of course, your local church should come first. But if the Lord has allowed you to have additional resources that you would like to bless ministries and you would consider Love, Life, and Marriage with the Woods or the BCV channel, a blessing to you and helps you to grow and be edified, then we definitely appreciate your support as well. If you'd like to support the ministry also through the BCV merchandise, you can do that by clicking the BCV link below at the bottom of this video. You can purchase hats and hoodies and other items as well. The BCV store is open. And we thank you so much for that. Moderators, thank you for holding it down. Facebook family, thank you as well. Please like and share this video. We want to get the word out. Let me jump right in and respond to these two hicks, these two idiots, as you just heard, particularly JD Fall, the drug addict who said that basically that it was Eileen Gray's fault for her children to receive what has happened to them. If that's not demonic and if that's not wicked and if that does not show you how ungodly and probably how unsaved this demon is, I don't know what else to tell you, but I will ask this question to JD. Let me go ahead and volley that same statement and sentiment back to you. I guess it's your wife's fault as well for you to be beating on her and beating on your children when you came home and assaulted them, right? So I think his wife's name is Mandy. I believe it's Mandy's fault for what happened to her and to her child. She should have been protecting them since you were supposed to be protecting them, but you betrayed their trust by beating them and assaulting them, therefore having a criminal record now against yourself. So I'm assuming that that would be equal and justified as well too, right? So your wife is just as culpable and responsible for her demise and for her being assaulted and beat down by her so-called husband. Sorry, excuse of a man like you are, right? Here's a little bit different, doesn't it? Anyway, I wanna get into this topic. This is a special broadcast and I want to just basically get right into this because I do have a lot to cover and I have a text that I want to expound upon and hopefully have all of us to rethink and also be forced to think biblically. Yeah, think biblically. Yeah, that's what I want. I want us to think biblically. I'm gonna go to my screen real quick and look at the poll. I put this poll up on purpose because I knew that there'll be some who will still struggle with answering the question and some who will try to be spiritual about it but that's not gonna wash and I'll tell you why in a minute. The poll question was, in light of recent events involving Seiko and Corey regarding John McArthur, who's right? Who's right? Even if it wasn't me and it was someone else in Corey, the question was, in light of recent events involving John McArthur, I'm sorry, excuse me, in light of recent events involving Seiko and Corey regarding John McArthur, who's right? 62% says me, that is Seiko. 22% of you said Corey. 15%, that's one five. 15% said I don't want to choose, I like both of them and I didn't have enough character space. So I had to say B-O-F-U-M. I can say both of them because YouTube only gave me 35 characters so I had to squeeze that thing in and put a little country spin to it but everyone should have said me and I'm not saying it to be prifle, I'm saying that because of the issue at hand and of course I'm gonna provide scripture because I have no other option. If I'm going to be a true follower and an ambassador for Christ, I must say what scripture says. I cannot say anything outside of scripture and then claim to be a faithful ambassador of Yahweh. I can't, therefore I won't. And by God's grace, I will always strive to say what the word of God says and provide BCV to everything related to life and godliness either by precept principle or by we see observable patterns of practice in the word of God. So hopefully these numbers will change before the stream is up but if not, we see pretty much where people's loyalties lie and a lot of it is not always regarding the truth. It's not always regarding the principles of the truth. It's mainly regarded to the persons or personalities and it's sad, it's sad. But I wanna lay out the foundation of what we wanna talk about today. Of course the title of this stream and this live as you saw in the thumbnail is who's side are you on because you're gonna have to pick a side.   You're gonna have to make a decision. You're gonna have to make a decision. And hopefully by the end of this live people's minds will be made up that they follow people who follow Christ, period. But let's jump right in the text. Joshua chapter 24 verses 14 to 50. I'm just gonna go through these scriptures because I wanna lay out the foundation and then bring us into the main subject and the main scripture that I'll be presenting in just a moment, but Joshua chapter 24 verse 14 through 15. Now therefore, Joshua says, fear the Lord and serve him in sincerity and truth and put away the gods which your father served beyond the river and in Egypt and served the Lord. Verse 15, if it is disagreeable in your sight to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves today whom you will serve. Whether the gods which your father served which were beyond the river or the gods of the Amorites and whose land you are living. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. First Kings 18. I'm just gonna try to just read these scriptures without providing any commentary. Gonna be hard, pray for me. First Kings chapter 18. Verse 20, so Ahab sent a message among all the sons of Israel and brought the prophets together at Mark Carmel. Elijah came near to all the people and said, how long would you hesitate between two opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him. But if Baal, above all, follow him. But the people did not answer him a word. Matthew chapter 15, verse 14. Matthew 15 and verse 14. Jesus says, leave them alone that is the Pharisees. Leave them alone or let them alone. They are blind guides of the blind. And if a blind man guides a blind man both will fall into a pit. First Corinthians four. First Corinthians four, verse 16. Therefore, Paul writes, therefore I exhort you, be imitators of me. Be imitators of me, Paul says. First Corinthians chapter 11 and verse one. Be imitators of me just as I also am of Christ. Verse 19, just gonna scroll down. Same chapter. For there must also be factions among you. So that those who are approved may become evident among you. Philippians chapter three, verse 17. Philippians three, 17. Paul writes again to the Philippian church, brethren, join in following my example and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. Chapter four of the same epistle. Verse nine, the things you have learned and received and heard and seen in me. Practice these things. Practice these things. And the God of peace will be with you. First Thessalonians chapter one and verse six. You also became imitators of us and of the Lord. Having received the word in much tribulation with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Chapter five of the same epistle, verse 21 and 22. But examine everything carefully. Hold fast to that which is good, abstain from every form of evil. In the second book of Thessalonians, chapter three, verse nine. Paul writes, not because we do not have the right to this but in order to offer ourselves as a model for you so that you would follow our example. Ephesians chapter five, verse 11. Ephesians five, 11 says, do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness but instead even expose them. First Timothy five, 22. Do not lay hands upon anyone too hastily and therefore or thereby share responsibility for the sins of others. Keep yourself free from sin. King James says, keep yourself, keep thyself pure. First John chapter four, verse five and six. They are from the world, John writes. Therefore they speak as from the world and the world listens to them. We are from God. He who knows God listens to us. He who was not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. Second John, verse 10 and 11.  Just wanted to read these verses to you. I have one more to read. The lower brother's one to my remembrance just as I was citing these texts. And so I wanna share this one with you and something here. This is going to be, I'll just go there. I'll just go there. Let me go back to Job. Job two, it started verse eight and nine. Nine, verse 10, eight through 10. Job two, verses eight through 10. Of course we know what happened to Job. He's suffering. He doesn't know why. We know why because we have the notes. But Job had no clue. He had no idea what was going on. And he's going through it. Verse eight, he says, and he took a pot shirt to scrape himself while he was sitting among the ashes. Then his wife said to him, do you still hold fast to your integrity?  I mean, she's seeing him go through this. She's seeing him suffer. She may mean well, but it's our counsel well. It's a counsel good. Let's see. But he, that is Job verse 10 said to her, you speak of the foolish women speaks. Shall we indeed accept good from God and not accept adversity? And all this Job did not sin with his lips. Let that sink in for a second, ladies and gentlemen. Sometimes it can be those who are closest to you that will teach or that will tempt you and teach you to sin against God. Sometimes it'll be your own people. Sometimes it'll be those that you trust that lay in your bosom, that sit under your roof in your bed. It could be your own people sometimes that will tempt you or I to sin against God. Let that sink in the ladies and gentlemen. Sometimes it could be the very people that you take time out of your busy schedule to tune in, to subscribe to, to follow, to financially support, to sew into their ministry. It can be the very ones that you yourselves are unsuspecting of that can teach, that can say the most ungodly thing because all that time, they may not have said anything before, but all of a sudden, you hear that hiss. You hear Satan's hiss in their speech of temptation. This is why the Bible tells us what to always be on the alert. Always, always. Doesn't matter who it is. Sometimes we let our guards down. Yeah, when we're around family and friends and things of that nature, it's understandable. But we're always to be discerning. Always. There should never be a time when we hear the word of God taught and we don't have our spiritual antennas up. We should be like the Baranians. We should be like the men of Isacar who understood their time so they knew how to respond. We should be like the Baranians that examine everything that Paul said, examine the scriptures daily to see what these things that Paul said were true. That it just take what Paul said because he was an apostle. You're not to take what I said or what I say or what I teach because I'm sick or worse. No, you take what I say and then you take this book, this inspired book, Holy Spirit inspired book and you take this and you take it, you open it. You ask the Lord to give you understanding because without understanding, I don't care how many languages you know. You can know HEB and Greek and Aramaic and Latin but without the spirits, understanding and illumination, you just have words. You may have information. You may have information, yeah, but you don't have illumination. Which one you want? Which one you want? You want to be finessed? You want to be wowed and roused and dazzled because of a person's knowledge or do you want to be impacted for God's glory by the foolish thing that can confound the wise? And some of you, unfortunately, have been wowed and it is a struggle for you to make a decision. But let me just say this to you, we make decisions all the time. You know what's significant about our choices and about our decisions? Some of the decisions that we make and some of the choices that we make have eternal, will have eternal impact. Some will have temporary impact, some will have temporal momentary impact but it's going to have impact nonetheless. We make choices every day. How do I know?  And some of you may think, oh, he came on at the same time that Cory comes on because it's five o'clock. Well, no, I have things to do. And so since I have things to do, my brother, Cory, doesn't own the five o'clock slot. God does. And so usually I would come on at seven but since I want to make sure that I get this information out and I have to rush through it and still meet my personal time, this is why I'm doing this special broadcast at this time slot. Now, I will say this. I will say this, brothers and sisters, you are going to have to make a decision who you're going to follow and who you're going to support. To not make a decision in this situation right here, I'm going to say this lovingly but I'm going to say it as real as I possibly can.  Dang, Seco, that's kind of messed up. No, it's not. It's the truth. Let me tell you why I know it's the truth because like I said before, you make decisions, you make choices all the time. Let's play exercise and let's play a little game, shall we? I'm going to put up, I'm going to put up or I'm going to make a statement of two names. I'm going to give you two names. And you tell me in the comments which one do you choose, okay? Do you choose or would you choose? Let's see. George Meyer or Elizabeth Elliott? Which one would you pick? Which one would you choose? Who would you follow? Who would you support? Would you support George Meyer or Elizabeth Elliott? Which one? Which one? Let me give you another one. Paula White, Paula White or Nancy Lee DeMoss-Walgamuth. Which one? Paula White or Nancy Lee DeMoss-Walgamuth. Which one are you going to pick? Which one? Which one? You only have two choices. Which one do you pick? You're going to pick George Meyer. You're going to pick Paula White or you're going to pick Elizabeth Elliott or Nancy Lee-Walgamuth. Which one are you going to get? See, I know my wife. She knows her word. David said Nancy, gracious Emmy. Gracious Me said Elizabeth hands down. Yeah. Let me give you another one. Let me give you another one. Probera said Elizabeth and Nancy. Ms. Moby said Elizabeth and Nancy. Later, Saturn said Nancy. She's speaking truth. Don't know her either. Yes. Yes, Nancy changed her name again. Oh, what? Come on, man. I didn't say it all that. So, yes, so let me give you another one. Joe Lowstein or your local pastor who's faithful in the Word of God? Whoever your local pastor is. Who do you pick? Joe Lowstein or your local pastor who's faithful and appreciative in teaching of God's Word? Which one do you pick? Who do you pick? Who do you pick? Which one do you choose? I'm trying to see something. Will said local. David said local. So, we're making all these choices, right? I know, Darrell, I know that's right. Not Joe. Yeah, a local pastor who's faithful, exactly. Exactly. Now, who do you choose now? In this situation regarding John McArthur, Saker Woods, Corey Minor. Keep it real, I'm looking for consistency. In regards to this situation right now, who do you choose? Who do you pick? Because you chose other people. Who do you choose? Regarding this situation, regarding pertaining to John McArthur and his defending child molesters, pedophiles and wife beaters, who at one time Corey was ably against it, calling for McArthur to be removed. Melbourne says Corey, okay. All right. So, again, so we do make decisions. We do make choices. The problem comes when our personalities, our personal personalities gets in the way. And that blinds and that skews judgment. And it never should. It never should. It never should. I was talking with my daughter Nyla last night, matter of fact, we went to go get a bite to eat. And she was just sharing with me. She had went to a fellowship and was really blessed by the fellowship and the ministry that she was able to and be invited to visit. And she's like, you know, I really wanna get more involved in doing activities in a local church. But she was like, but where can we go? I mean, and y'all know our story. Y'all know our struggle. We were at a place that we thought, we were at a place that we thought we would be able to dig our heels in, be committed. We went through the membership class and then they started dealing with the BGLO, Black Greek letter organization, you know, Fras and Sororities. And then they had this LGBT affirming reform Jew, speak at the church. We had already left. We just left a week before they brought them in there. Which caused other people to leave. And then come to find out we were talking to someone else. Didn't even know this was by God's providence. They were struggling with the same thing. We didn't even know these people. I was actually met them doing business. My wife and I did. And we just were talking and I said, you know, well, you know, kind of find out that this individual was a believer and saw her plaques and saw Bible scriptures and things on her shelf.  She said, yeah. I said, man, we praise God, you know, it's this small talk, this small talk.   And, you know, we're gonna try to find us a church as well too. And she said, yeah. So, yeah, I attended a church out in the Woodlands. And my wife immediately and I was saying in our head, we were like, oh, Lord, please don't say it, please don't say it. And she said it. She said the name of the church, impact. And as we were walking out of the office, the lady asked us to do an about face and come back in because she wanted to know why did we leave? And that was another 45 minute conversation. And this was sharing our experience and sharing what happened and things of that nation. And she was sharing the same struggles. And all three of us were in the office there and was like, why is it that the churches came to say what the word of God says? Why do we have to be like the world? What is it about the today's church that is causing us to now have to be forced to make a decision, to be forced to be forced to choose because they've compromised the gospel. They've compromised sound doctrine. They've compromised and now are siding with the world. Places that you thought and that you would just believe and know are biblical and sound when it comes to putting this thing into practice and emotion, it's just all fluff, it's all paper. And of course we know there's no perfect church. But I felt my daughter's concern. Right now we're attending a fellowship, but when you are looking for something, you don't wanna just settle. And so the place that we're attending, we like it, but we're not sure that's where we wanna be, but we're there. But when we were attending Impact in our area here, we thought that this was a place that we can just make ourself at home and get connected and the Lord had other plans because what we're not gonna do is compromise. What we're not gonna do is settle. What we're not gonna do is lay down and let the devil run over God's people in God's church. We would rather be spiritual vagabonds than to settle and compromise. And unfortunately that is some of you. You're settling and compromising over personality instead of standing upon the precepts and principles of God's word. And so this live is for all of us and particularly for those of you who are straddling defense. You know you need to make a decision. You know you need to take a side and pick a side because the word of God commands us to. Either we're gonna be for God or we're gonna be for Satan. Or we're gonna be for the body of Christ or we're gonna be for the household of Satan. We can't have it both ways. Jesus said, no man can serve two masters. No man, no one.  And this is why I read to you those scriptures because I didn't want you thinking that I'm making this stuff up. Paul said, follow me as I follow Christ. That's what Paul said. Paul said, join me in following my example and observe the pattern of those in whom you see walk in you. These are not suggestions, ladies and gentlemen. John said, this is how we know from the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. Those who are of the world, they speak like the world. The world follows them. Those of us who are of God will listen to the people of God. So there's a decision you must make. And unfortunately, again, some of you by your non-decision have already made your decision. You rather follow people because of their personality and their tone instead of the fact of saying, well, wait a minute. Yeah, they're talking nice and they're talking gentle and soft-spoken, but wait a minute, that's heresy. To say that I can sin publicly and not be required to repent publicly when we see in Scripture, Matthew 18, teaches otherwise. First Corinthians chapter five teaches otherwise. First Timothy five teaches otherwise. That's not of God, that's of Satan. And especially when you know that that teaching had never come out of the mouth of Cory Minor before. But we'll take it because it's Cory.  I would be marked and avoided for real. And you know what? Rightly so. I don't think Satan was yelling in Eve's ear when he said to her, have God said? Have God really said? I don't think he was probably having a bullhorn in her ear. I don't think he was being boisterous in her ear. I don't think so. I think it was subtle. I believe it was soft. I don't think he was being bombastic with his deception. That's the why he comes as an angel of light. He comes with smooth speech. He doesn't come with thunderous tones. No, he's smooth with it. And that's how we know. But for many of you, for many of you, you're rather subtle than staying upon the word of God. And I say that, I say that to your shame. It's time to make a decision, brothers and sisters. Stand for who is standing for what's right. Stand for what's right. Make a decision, draw a line in the sand. You can't have it both ways. Stop looking at people and look at what these people stand for and what they preach and what they promote and who they stand for and who they stand with and what they're standing for. This is why I laid out some of these clips because these are some of the people that our brother, I know for a fact, based on my conversation with him, has allowed to be in his ear. And again, it's time for you to make a decision, ladies and gentlemen, it's time to make a decision. My decision is made by God's grace. I'm going to follow those who follow Christ. I'm going to support those who follow and submit to Christ. Period, point blank, end of discussion. My Bible is open to Exodus chapter 32. I'll invite you to go there with me. Exodus chapter 32. We're going to focus on verses 25 and 26, but I'm also going to come back and read the remaining portion of Exodus 32 in verse 25 and 26. We're focusing on that right now, but we're going to come back and circle the wagons and go over that entire chapter a little bit. Exodus chapter 32. This is after Moses comes down from Sinai with the tablets. He sees Israel in idolatry and sin. Verse 25, now when Moses saw the people were out of control for Aaron had let them get out of control to be a derision among their enemies, then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, look at this, look at this, whoever is on the Lord's or whoever's for the Lord, excuse me, come to me. Do you see that? Whoever is for the Lord, notice what he said, come to me. You know that the notes, they didn't make a decision. They had to take action. They had to decide who they were going to follow. That's what Moses said. If you're for the Lord, if you're on the Lord's side, you come where I am, you come to me.  No, no, no, you come to me. I'm not the one that's out of bounds. I'm not the one that's out of pocket. I'm not the one that's in sin.  You show your allegiance to God by coming to the people of God who represents God, who follow God, who submits to God's authority in his kingdom, in his rule. Yeah, that's what Moses said. Why did he say that? Because of sin. And now people have to make a decision. Are you going to stay in sin? Are you going to come out of sin? Are you going to repent? Are you going to make excuses for sin? Are you going to turn from it and show your turning from sin by making tangible steps, making your calling in election short and bearing forth fruits and keeping with repentance. Don't tell me that you follow Christ. Don't say that we follow Christ but there's no evidence of that. That's not what they did. Moses said, whoever's for the Lord, come to me and notice, and all the sons of Levi gathered to him. That's it? Yeah, God has a remnant. You know who was serious about God when it's time to deal with sin. You know who's serious about God when it's time to confront sin.  You don't have to guess. There's a lot of guessing right now in this situation.  I like Corey, but you know what I mean? I just pray y'all get it together. We can't get it together. Somebody has to repent and it ain't me. Somebody has to make it right and it ain't me. Somebody's about to apologize. Somebody's about to go before God's people publicly the way that they did publicly and cause all this confusion and it's not me. Amos 3-3 says, how can two walk together unless they agree? We don't want to make anybody choose to make a decision. Well, no, that's what the Bible says. The Bible says, no, you didn't make a decision. It's not what you're gonna do. Who are you gonna follow? Who are you going to follow? And let's go back to the beginning of this text. Let me start in verse one. Let's give you a little context here. Now, when the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, look at this. The people assembled about Aaron and said to him, Aaron is the leader. And Aaron is in charge now since Moses is gone to meet with the Lord. He says, it said, come, the people, come to Aaron. Come make us a God who would go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us up from the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him. And he's been gone for a while and they don't want to wait. And so now they got to have something to worship, they're saying. Notice what Aaron said in verse two. Did Aaron rebuke them? Did Aaron say, no, you must be out your mind. We're not doing that. I refuse to do that, no. What did he do? He compromised. Not only did he compromise, but he crafted the very thing that they wanted. Verse two, Aaron said to them, tear off the gold rings which are in the ears of your wives, your sons and your daughters and bring them to me. And then all the people throw off the gold rings which were in their ears and brought them to Aaron. He took this from their hand and fashioned it with a graving tool and made it into a molten calf.  Now when Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation and said, tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord. Do you see this? Do you see how wicked this is? Verse six, so the next day they rose early and offered burnt offerings and brought peace offerings. And the people sat down to eat and to drink and rose up to play, having orgies and everything. Then the Lord spoke to Moses, go down at once for your people, God is funny, for your people whom you brought up from the land of Egypt have corrupted themselves. They have quickly turned aside from the way which I commanded them. They have made for themselves a molten calf and have worshiped it and have sacrificed to it and said, this is your God, O Israel, who brought you up from the land of Egypt. The Lord said to Moses, I have seen this people and behold, they are an obstinate people.  God's like, man, let me just start from scratch. Just saying nothing, but look what Moses did. Now mind you, this is a whole entire nation of people and Moses is now interceding. Just like Christ intercedes for us when we ask the food.  Lord, you're the one who did this. I'm just a vessel, I know you know this, but Lord, I'm just bringing it to you. Lord, you're the one who did this. You just called me to do this, but Lord, by your might and by your power.   Remember, Abraham, Isaac and Israel, your servants to whom you swore by yourself and said to them, I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heavens and all this land of which I have spoken I will give to your descendants and they shall inherit it forever. So the Lord changed his mind about the harm which he was about to do, which he would do to his people. Then Moses turned and went down from the mountain with the two tablets of the testimony in his hand, tablets which were written on both sides. They were written on one side and the other. The tablets were God's work and the writing was God's writing engraved on the tablets. In other words, God wrote this. He autographed these tablets of stone. Verse 17, now when Joshua heard the sound of the trumpet as they shouted, he said to Moses, there's a sound of war in the camp. But he said, it is not a sound of the cry of triumph, nor is it a sound of the cry of defeat but the sound of singing out here. Verse 19, and it came about as soon as Moses came near the camp that he saw the calf and the dancing and Moses' anger burned and he threw the tablets from his hands and shattered them at the foot of the mountain. He took the calf which they had made and burned it with fire and ground it to powder and scattered it over the surface of the water and made the sons of Israel drink it. Oh, that sounds kind of harsh, doesn't it? Huh, wow, why did Moses just talk to him? Why did Moses have to get an attitude? Why was Moses angry? Moses should have just had a conversation, he should have just pulled them all to the side and told them we shouldn't do this y'all, y'all shouldn't do this. Moses shouldn't embarrass the people like that, making them drink their idols and see that's the problem. Many of us are more concerned and worried about people being offended when they've already offended our God. Moses didn't care about them being hurt or them being offended. His anger was righteous anger. His anger was righteous indignation and he showed it. Now, interestingly, this didn't just happen real quick. He had to, this took some time for him to destroy that calf and to burn it and to grind it and to powder it and he forced them, he made them drink it. He made them take the consequences of their sin upon themselves. Yes, sins feel good until we have to pay the price for it. Verse 21, verse 21 y'all. Then Moses said to Aaron, what did this people do to you that you are brought such great sin upon them? You were Moses just asking Aaron, bro, how did you let this happen?  You're supposed to be the teacher. You're supposed to be the example and you're the one that is compromised. You're the one who has vacillated. You're the one who is now taking orders from the people instead of representing God and telling people, no, this is what we're going to do and remind them. Notice what he says in verse 21. What did this people do to you that you have brought such great sin upon them? Aaron, you did this. No, not them. You, you're the leader. You're in charge to who much is given, much to require, remember y'all? And that's what I have to ask. That's what I have to ask my brother, Corey. Corey, what did the mob do to you, bro? What did the mob do to you? What did these people do to you to have you now compromised? To have you okay, sin and wickedness? What did they say to you, bro? Did they, did somebody threaten you? Did somebody promise you something? Who changed? Because the Corey of 2022, brother, it's not the Corey of 2023. Who got in your ear? Who influenced you? Who made you now capitulate? Who made you now fall into compromise and in sin? Who? Because based on the evidence, based on what we have, there's no reason to support a preacher like John MacArthur who has been defending, protecting, financing pedophiles, child molesters and wife beaters, brother. No reason for it whatsoever. There's no new information that will ever change that fact. If anything, we should be doubling down on it.  You think your information is more succinct than what Elder Hon Cho's information was and he's the one that did the investigation. Based on your conversation in mind, who else will be knowing more information besides Julie Roy's and others who have done this report? And I know you've been talking to the mob. That's the fact. You alluded to that on the conversation. So what have you done? What made you change? That's what Moses is asking Aaron, bro, what does people do to you man? Verse 22, here it is right here, peer pressure. Verse 22 and 23, do not let the anger of my Lord burn. You know the people yourself that they are prone to evil. Now he's blame shifting. For they said to me, make a God for us who will go before us for this Moses, the man who brought us up from the land of Egypt. We do not know what has become of him. I said to them, whoever has any gold, let them tear it off. So they gave it to me and I threw it into the fire and out came this calf. Oh my God, look at what happened. It just came out, it just happened. Now, verse 25, when Moses saw that the people were out of control for Aaron had let them get out of control. Notice it goes back to the leadership. It goes back to the teacher. That's who it goes back to. For Aaron had let them get out of control to be a derision among their enemies. Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, whoever is for the Lord, come to me. And literally it says, whoever is for the Lord, to me. They understood what it meant. And verse 26, the B. Claw says, and all the sons of Israel gathered to him. He said to them, thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, every man put his sword on his thigh and go back and forth from the gate in the camp and kill every man, his brother, and every man, his friend, and every man, his neighbor. It's judgment, ladies and gentlemen. They've gotten involved in idolatry. They've gotten involved in worshiping that which is created versus the creator himself. And now judgment has come upon these idolaters. So the sons of Levi did as Moses instructed and about 3,000 men of the people fell that day. Then Moses said, dedicate yourselves today to the Lord for every man has been against his son and against his brother. In order that he may bestow a blessing upon you today. In other words, God says, do this. It doesn't look right to those who are on the outside, but God says, I bless those who are obedient and take sin seriously. Yes, that's what God does. And when we have to deal with sin, it gets ugly. When we have to deal with sin, yes, it gets messy. When we have to deal with sin, it can be bloody. And I'm not talking about physical bloody, y'all. I hope y'all get the spirit behind what I'm saying. But when we have to deal with sin, it is not going to look good. Can you imagine? These Levites, this is family. These are people that they have grown up with. And now they have to enact judgment upon those who were in sin. And I thank God we're not under this dispensation and covenant, but the principle I believe is clear. The principle I believe is very clear. When God in his word tells us how we are to deal with sin, let's not play games with that. If God tells us how we are to respond to those who are in sin and he does and he has and he will by his spirit, but more importantly, primarily through his word, we can't play these games and go back into memory lane and say, well, you know, I remember when he was this and I remember when brother so-and-so and sister so-and-so did this for me and none of that matters. They're in sin. They have not repented. They're making light of it. They're enjoying their sin. They're not being accountable or responsible for their sin and they're causing other people to sin. God says that they must be dealt with. They must be dealt with. And sometimes dealing with sin is harsh. Yep.  That's unfortunate.  Some people need to be removed and excised out of our life. It's time out for the pusillanimous men. It's time out for them. It's time for us to be bold. It's time for us to take a stand for what is right. Even if it means you stand alone, you and I are to stand. Why? Because God's word commands us to be bold. He says the fear of man brings a snare. But he who trusts in the Lord will be kept safe. That's what the word of God says. We cannot afford to play games in these last days. We cannot. What did you say? Read Mark 9, 42. Brother, I was trying to do my Bible study, man. Let me see. Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for him if a heavy millstone be hung around his neck and he had been cast into the sea. Y'all see that? That is definitely true. That is definitely true. Again, I want us to understand something. Like I said, I read those scriptures to you all for a reason. I read those scriptures to you because I want you to understand that we make choices all the time. And I make it even practical. Some of you are moderators for Corey knowing that our brother is in sin. Let me ask you, if the shoe was on other foot and it were me, would you still do that? Oh, let me put it this way. What would it take for some of you to take a stand? How about that? What does it take? What would it take for some of you to take a stand for what is right? The man has clearly said that John MacArthur's not the bad guy. The man at one time said, just a year ago, that John MacArthur needs to step down, he's not qualified. Now he's re-qualified? What changed? And what new information does this brother have whereby these statements are being made and there's no accountability, there's no answer? He's not responsible to give an answer now. See, when you and I align ourselves with certain things, that gives our support to that very thing. Yeah, and it's unfortunate. What does he have to do?   Yes, he should. He owes somebody an apology publicly. Mop-up says, Pastor Secker, what do you want us to do? Abandon Corey? What do you mean by abandon? What do you mean by abandon? I want you to break down your words, elucidate that. Tell me what I said that's unbiblical. Is Corey in sin? You tell me. You tell me. What does the Bible tell us to do? What does the Word of God tell us to do? Some of you saying people had no problem marketing and avoiding me and abandoning, quote unquote, me and I didn't do anything. Just saying, what does it take for you all to make a biblical decision? And notice, nobody can argue with the verses that I gave you. You know why? Because they stand on their own. You see in scripture, people being told to follow those who follow Christ. You see that. The question is, do you want to see it? That's the question. Testament said, Mop-up, if we abandoned Corey, we would be doing another subject. Yeah, I know everybody's not in sin. That's wrong, that's a lie. No, everybody's not in sin. I'm not sure where you get your theology from, but no, everybody is not in sin. We sin, but no one lives in sin as a pattern of life. No, sir, try again. Try again. How about you hold brother Corey accountable? How about some of you reach out to him and say, brother, what's going on? Saw your videos, saw what you said last year, what changed this year? What about that? Because again, we make decisions all the time.  No, let me give my excitation first. I give my excitation first. Some of you, again, I'm just going to encourage you. Count the cost of what you are doing. Count the cost of this, of this life. What I do is not for everyone. I know what God has called me to do. I know what he has commissioned me to do. Therefore, the cost has already been counted for me, and I don't expect for people to do things the way that I do it, but I want to encourage you. Do what the Lord has commissioned and called you to do. When you and I say, and when you and I see a brother or sister fall into sin or air, and we have the ability to come alongside and to help them and to hold them accountable, we need to do that. We need to do that. We definitely need to do that. No, there will not be a 7 p.m. video. This is a special video, special stream today. But again, I want to, again, encourage us. I want to encourage us that we're going to have to take a stand. This is not a game. This is not a joke. This is why I laid out the scriptures as best as I could to make sure that you understand that we all have choices. And we all make choices. But some of us are making choices based on personality. We are now violating Proverbs 11-1. We're making unjust weights and measures instead of just saying, hey, this is not right. This is wrong. If this brother can't see this, then I don't want to support anything that's going to violate the Word of God. Because one minute you're saying, okay, John, John, John. Because one minute you're saying, okay, John McGrath is not in sin for this. Then what else is he going to say he's in sin for? Or who else? It always starts with the little stuff. Always. Always. And so I caution you. Guard your hearts. Please, guard your hearts. My warning to the mob is this. I don't know who y'all think y'all are trying to intimidate. I don't know. I know David Morrill. David Nomorrill has been trying to circle the wagons now and trying to garner and gather people like deal with Christians and others to pull up, I guess, information and data, whatever like that. Do what you will. But understand this. I'm not here for games, dude. With none of y'all. And I don't play when it comes to the word of God. I don't play when it comes to souls. And I definitely don't play when it comes to family. And I know you're going to watch this video, but it's not a game. You're playing dangerous games.  That's not, that's not going to happen. Doing that over here. It's dangerous, sir. It's dangerous. It's dangerous. You don't know nothing about that, man. Facts. They don't. And so my advice to you is this. David Morrill, the mob, deal with Christian, April Chapman, Michael Williams, Ricky Gantz, Ricky Caldwell, bottom line dad, whoever you are. Cade of truth, which is not. I'm going to let Mr. Bean stare you. But play with something safe, man. Don't play with me. Period. Y'all already know how I move. But if you want a war, you'll get one. But I advise you to count the cost yourself. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm done. That is my time. I appreciate it. Let me go through these comments real quick and I'll let you all go. If there are any for me. Let's see. Gracious me said, when you come out of seriously false doctrine, it takes years to learn what who to trust. So when people show themselves untrustworthy after trust has been. Yeah, it's definitely sad. It's definitely sad. Yeah, all the while while court documents proving what this man did and puts money on his books while in prison for his crimes. It still is. And it's still a member of Grace Community Church. Yeah, still a member by Eileen Gray is in bad standing. The mob is the mob on the individual I just mentioned. David Morrill and DeWolf Christian, April Chapman, Kate Uptrue, Baren Bapes, Ricky Gantz, Ricky Caldwell, Bottom Line Dad. There's a few of them. But I mean, they're just people that's trying to man for they keep and protect John MacArthur, put it that way. That's who they are. That's who they are. And it's interesting that people like April Chapman and she left her church because her pastor did not did not handle abuse cases correctly.  You should just stay there if you're going to be supporting MacArthur. Yeah, because talking about me makes money. Remember that talking about me makes makes money for them. Why bully at this age? Because they have nothing better to do and see here's the thing. They do it to the wrong person. And that's what I said. Don't play with me. Well, play with something safe, man. Don't play with me. And I mean that with every fiber of my being. That's why they won't pull up.  They will more or no what time it is. He's front like he wants to do it, but he won't. I mean, I'll wait, but it's going to be on the right terms because we already know how to get down. We already know how they move. They're liars. They're devils. And so, yeah, I'll definitely camera with them. We have a moderator and it can be in public. But you saw the clips of these two clowns made those two Hicks. They mocked. Eileen Gray mocked her. And that devil, that devil Jordan Hall, JD Hall, said that it was Eileen Gray's fault. What happened to her and her children? Who says that but a demon? And so I'm convinced. I'm convinced that these people not say they don't know God. And it's evident that JD Hall doesn't look at his life now. So that's all I got y'all. But I thank you all for being a part of this being part of this live. Please like, subscribe and share this information. I really do appreciate it. It helps us to get this channel through the algorithm. And a lot of you have not been receiving notifications as well. So we're still working on our website to have the mailing list. So you can have that information daily and be up to date and abreast of what's going on with our channel. But you can support the ministry through the links there. Let's take it across the screen and also in the description below. We do thank you for that. And to be part of this live. We do thank you for that. And the BCV merchandise. You can go to the to the website and hit the link there. Our BCV store is open up and running. And do thank you all for that as well too. All right. So yes, I wanted to do this special live. But hey, but tune in tomorrow. Tune in tomorrow. Tomorrow night, 7 p.m. Dr. Dennis Swanson will be my special guest. We're going to be talking about bullies in the body. Bullies in the body. Addressing confronting spiritual abuse within the church. Dr. Dennis Swanson is my special guest. He's a former member and faculty member at Grace Community Church and the Master's Seminary University. He's been there for 25 years. He definitely has some stuff to say. And so we're looking forward to that conversation on tomorrow.  I'll try to open up the floor for questions in case you have any. So looking forward to this conversation on tomorrow. All right. So again, tomorrow night, 7 p.m. It's an interesting time. Tune in. But again, thank you, moderators. I appreciate you all for holding it down. Facebook family, thank you all so for joining. That is my time for the special broadcast. I thank you for yours. Y'all know the drill. Whatever you do, do all to the glory and honor of God. God bless.


This is the second year of the CBI KPMG Infrastructure Survey, and it's been really interesting to compare the messages from this year and last year. The key message coming out from businesses is, well, action to speak louder than words. We've seen a lot of good announcements from government over recent months about all the changes that they want to see in terms of our infrastructure.  And so the key message is we need to see infrastructure improvements. Roads is a really big area of interest for all respondents of the survey. Local roads in particular, we've seen a deterioration in our local road network over the last five years, and that's a big area for attention. And the other area that comes out is energy. If you look at the responses from businesses in terms of the competitiveness as they see it of our infrastructure links, they believe that particularly in energy and transport, we're lagging behind our international counterparts. And compared to our EU competitors, 61% of businesses say that the UK's infrastructure is not up to scratch by comparison. It is all about delivery. We have seen some really important announcements over the last few months, in particular the government's announcement about the UK guarantees programme. Now, that will be a game changer in terms of financing infrastructure in this country. We've got the bill going into Parliament to implement that, and that should unlock pension and other capital markets funding to go into our infrastructure in this country. And that's a really important step forward. But the key is how quickly can we do it. We need to see some decisions taken over the next couple of months that actually get schemes started with the backing of UK guarantees.


Do you know how many people visit Imam Musab Najafar and don't cry by his grave? Do you know? Because they say we don't know anything about his life. No Imam of Ahlul Bayt was tortured like Musab Najafar. No Imam! Aba Abdullah there is no day like Aba Abdullah but there are no years like Imam Musalqa.


Here's an interesting proposition. Is a service boot by definition American? If you look at this boot, you can see quite clearly that it is in a service boot pattern. But this boot is made in Italy with a soft crepe sole. So is it in fact a service boot? G'day, how you going? Welcome to my channel Boot Lossophy and if you haven't been here before my name is Tech. In accordance with the millennia old cultural protocols of Australian First Nations peoples, let me first acknowledge the traditional custodians of the lands and waters that I live and work on, the Wajik people of the Nungar Language Group. Today I'm taking a look at this pair of what I might call service boots made by Italian company Astor Flex and called their dowel flex boot. Now Astor Flex call all of their models a name that ends with flex. So for example I have already reviewed their Chelsea boot called the Bitflex which you can see by clicking on the link up there. Now full disclosure, this pair of boots was provided to me by Huckberry for review but the video is not sponsored and I'm not really obliged to say anything other than that how I truly feel about these boots, good or bad. You should know though that I'm quite a fan of the brand Astor Flex as I found them very comfortable and casually stylish in the past. Let's see how these shape up to the others that I had from earlier. If you like the look and you like the review of them you might want to take a look at them on the website and I'll leave a link in the description box below. This dowel flex boot definitely uses a service boot pattern which is commonly associated with American heritage style boots. The dowel flex is quite different to the other six inch boot called the boot flex. I've also previously reviewed that boot and you can watch that review up there in the corner. I can now see that the boot flex is in fact a Southern European work boots style used by farmers and shepherds in Southern Europe mainly Portugal, Spain and Italy and Central Europe. This dowel flex boot on the other hand is modelled after what I've been used to calling a service boot pattern. Here's the interesting thing, are service boots actually American? European makers don't call similar boots service boots and if they call them anything other than a Derby boot for the opening they probably call them ankle boots. And if as an American you really want to blow your mind jump outside your own borders and google images for the tricker's logger boot to see what the Brits think a logger boot looks like. This dowel flex boot has a five inch shaft similar to a US Marine boondocker style from World War II and it's constructed with just three basic panels being the vamp piece and the two quarter pieces. The lined and ungusseted tongue is sewn to the vamp piece and there is a single piece backstay up the middle. It has an interesting inner heel counter stitched into place with a piece of suede on the inside of the boot. The toe box is a round plain toe box and the whole set of uppers is set on top of a natural crepe rubber sole using the stitch down method of construction which I'll get into when I talk about construction methods. Now aesthetically it's a very simple looking boot and because of the simplicity it's very attractive as an everyday casual boot. In this dark chestnut new buck leather that's slightly lightly oiled the mid brown color moves around as you walk and flex the uppers. As such I think it's a casual boot for casual relaxed or social occasions. I think the most appropriate outfits to go with this boot would be casual and relaxed chino pants or jeans with a t-shirt a polo shirt or relaxed button-up shirt. For example a pair of light washed jeans and then oxford cloth button-down shirt with or without a jacket would give you the appropriate relaxed vibes or you could pair the boots with a pair of khaki chinos and a blue button-down shirt with a dark blue blazer and that would be suitable for a casual friday in a professional office. You can also of course wear the boots with a pair of dark or mid-washed jeans and a simple t-shirt to go to a summer's barbecue or an afternoon at the pub. This is such a traditional looking boot and so casual with it that I'm pretty sure it would go with almost any outfit as long as you get your colors right. Stick to basic neutral colors like brown, blue, black, gray, white and olive green. Before we go on let me just give you a brief description and history of the brand. Estor Flex is an italian company founded by the Travanzoli family in the 1890s in a small town that had a lot of family-run boot and shoemaking workshops. The company grew through the years especially after the First World War into an industrialized factory setup and they continued making traditional stitched-down shoes from the same town. Today the family ownership is into its sixth generation and the current owners have embraced an eco-conscious mission to the boot-making ensuring that they use vegetarian leathers to avoid the chrome salt spillage as well as natural rubber for their soles, water-based dyes and non-solvent glues. They've had a partnership with Huckbury for about 10 years now and also make loafers, Chelsea boots and chuckas all called something flex. When I've reviewed Estor Flex boots before like the brown flex chucker up there people have commented that as an italian maker it's not very refined. It's interesting people from different countries seem to travel a lot more than people from others and often it's people who have not traveled perhaps that expect italian footwear to be all sophisticated Gucci products when they see which they see on their TV screens. In fact Italy has a centuries old tradition of making footwear for workers and peasants that have continued to develop into very functional economical shoes and boots for relaxed kick-around casual wear and light work wear. Now let me talk about the construction. As usual I'll start from the bottom and I'll work my way up. At the bottom is this very soft crepe rubber sole. It's slightly over one centimetre thick and the very low block heel is also made of crepe rubber and glued onto the outsole. This type of crepe sole is made of natural rubber. When I was a child I spent some time in Malaysia living near a rubber plantation and I used to watch the liquid rubber being poured into curing trays mixed with acids and then rolled through rollers called crepiers producing sheets of this crepe rubber for storage and transport. This type of outsole is probably most famously used in Clark's desert boots. It is extremely soft and shock absorbing however can wear quite quickly and definitely picks up all sorts of dirt and gravel and sand and anything else you care to mention.  If you don't mind that it's a very practical outsole for a casual boot because of its grip and comfort but being a bit unsightly probably not great for a dressy occasion. Above the crepe rubber outsole is what looks like a leather midsole. Now it could actually be made of leather board.  There is no shank that I'm aware of and as a result it's actually very flexible and in fact not very stable if you flex it from side to side. The heel is actually very low it's only about 25 millimeters tall and the height difference between your heel and the ball of your foot is only a drop of about 10 millimeters. As a result the weight of your feet don't exert a great deal of pressure into that gap between the heel and the ball of the foot. The inside of the boot is also very flat and so for someone like me with slightly collapsed arches while it's a very comfortable boot to lounge around in it would probably begin to feel painful under the arches if I stood around for too long in it. I have had to insert a heel lift in order to make sure that I have enough of a height difference between my heel and my forefoot in order to feel comfortable. I think I can categorically say that while this is a comfortable casual lounge about boot it is not a boot for standing around in all day and definitely not a work boot or even a boot to go for a long walk in. Moving on up while staying inside the boot there is no cork filling because there's no cavity caused by a welt. This is a stitch down boot and so does not use a welt around the outside of the boot. There is however a thin leather comfort insole made from soft calfskin that's lightly padded with memory foam for comfort and it's not removable. As I said this boot uses the stitch down method of construction in order to fix the uppers to the sole. In this method of construction the uppers are lasted around the last and then flared up and the flared out edge is sewn directly onto the midsole. It is a 360 degree stitch down construction meaning that the stitching of the uppers to the midsole goes all the way around the boot. The crepe rubber outsole is then glued to the midsole. The stitch down stitching is nothing to write home about. While structurally sound it's not particularly good looking. However you have to remember the price which I'll get into as well as the rough casual users that I think you might put this boot into. Otherwise the stitching on the uppers is okay. The quarters are attached to the vamp with a double row stitch while mostly everything else is single row stitched. The toe box is totally unstructured and it's very soft and pliable which is one of the comfort factors when you put the boot on. The heel counter is also soft I'd say and presumably is either a thermoplastic like salastic or a thin leather board or even cardboard. I suspect it's cardboard. It uses an internal heel counter and on the inside I'm not sure you can see it's covered by a piece of suede to give your heel some grip against slippage. The edges of the collar and running down the lace facings it's covered by a rolled edge of leather. This is unexpected for a boot at this price point quite sophisticated. I think I've already said that the tongue is ungusseted however it is the only piece of the uppers that is lined and as this lining thickens the tongue I find it doesn't slip over which many of the tongues in my other ungusseted tongue boots will tend to do. At the rest of the boot vamp and shaft are unlined. I'm not sure this is necessarily a bad thing because it it does not feel uncomfortable and does seem to breathe better in our hot summers. There are eight antique brass eyelets and they are backed with inset washes so they should not mark the leather in the tongue. The laces provided are a pair of flat woven cotton laces and I think suit the look of the boot. The uppers leather is newbuck. Newbuck leather is a corrected full-grain leather. The most famous type of newbuck leather is the yellow newbuck leather used by Timberland Boots. In this case it's about 2.2 millimeters thick which is about average for thicker newbucks. When I said that newbuck leather is corrected I mean that they lightly sand or buff the grain side of the leather ever so slightly so as to create that slightly velvety nappy feel to the surface. This creates a surface that is more resistant to scratching than smooth grain leathers. In this case it's a bovine newbuck that's rotated in a drum in water and then naturally dried and from the feel of it I believe also lightly oiled. This will help to create a certain water resistance and what it also does is create a subtle patterning and show a difference in coloration as the oils move around inside the leather. In many ways this is I suppose the ultimate pull-up leather. I find this quite an attractive leather because of the way the oils move around. Within a few weeks it was starting to show wear and patina. However what I don't like about it is the way the creases form very quickly on the vamp and in one area on the right boot here at the very top there are some creases that are beginning to look like loose grain. Look once again though I have to remind myself of this as a casual kick around boot. Caring for newbuck is simple I think regular brushing is a must. With this texture I find that it picks up a lot of dust and you always know that because when you rub or stroke the boots with bare hands your hands come up feeling a little powdery. The second tip is to apply some type of waterproofing spray before your first wear. Anything you can use to waterproof suede should be okay for newbuck and the one that I use is Tarago's Nano Spray Protector because it's a reasonable mid-price. It will soak the leather as soon as you spray it on and darken it but don't panic because it will dry back to the original color. If the newbuck gets marked you can use a suede eraser to rub off the marks literally and then if it spots give the whole boot a light rub over with the eraser. Immediately after this and also from time to time I think give the boots a brush with a stiff brushed suede brush to clean up the light nap not the copper type but the plastic type. I never saddle soap my newbuck leathers I think the waxes in the saddle soap can penetrate the corrected surface and make the nap stand down and look a little too shiny. Otherwise it's a tough leather again look at an old pair of Timberland yellow boots that they can take punishment. As for sizing fit and comfort I've already spoken about the comfort. At first step it's pretty comfortable and the shock absorption is definitely good but to be honest after a long day your feet might ache because of the flat nature of the sole and the lack of arch support. It's kind of like slippers your feet feel good in them but you probably wouldn't walk around outside all day in slippers. The unlined uppers though allows your feet to breathe and they are soft and supple despite being over two millimeters thick so your feet I think will like them. In terms of sizing the Huckbury website equates a US 8 with an European 41. Now this is tricky. First off my size measured on a US brand new device is eight and a half and I usually wear US Heritage boots a half size down in US 8s. My European sizing can be all over the place but I measure between an European 41 and 41.5. However if you place your trust on the Huckbury conversion then I'd say to you to order in the size that you usually wear in US Heritage boots so for me what Huckbury calls an eight is the right size. It's reasonably snug in the heel waist and the ball of the foot without actually pinching and the rounded toe shape of the last gives me a good feel in the toe box without any toes feeling squashed. Now let's turn to value. On the Huckbury website the link is below they are listed at US $225. This puts them in the lower price range of all service boots and you can compare them to Thursday captains at $200 or their vanguards at $265. The Blake stitched helm holless is $295. The red wing iron ranger not as sleek but certainly sturdily made maybe even better made is $350. So in price terms bang in the range and maybe even at the lower end of the price range for a boot like this. In value terms what you get is an eco-conscious boot if that's important to you some comfort in the wear and shock absorption feeling more like slippers than rugged boots an interesting leather and reasonably well made QC. Look all in all I think it's about bang on the money where the price meets the value in my opinion. Huckbury do have sales often through the year as they move inventory so if you see these on sale I think that would be a good pickup and so to summarize yeah looks like a service boot but not really a service boot. I'll be European and call it an ankle boot. It's fundamentally an attractive casual boot that you can wear anywhere except to the most dressy occasions or the most professional suit and tie offices. I really feel at home wearing it at home kicking around in the house relaxing even lounging in front of the TV with my feet on top of the lounge don't tell my wife. Going for walks around the neighborhood is fine and it's very comfy to do that. Stand around and all day I don't think so I have to get some sort of arch support insert. Price to value is about right and it's easy to care for so there you go. I hope you liked the review and if you did please click on the like button if you're not subscribed click on that button as well. Until the next time guys take care of yourselves and I'll see you soon


Welcome to the Crimson Engine, my name is Rubidiam. Today we are looking at this camera, the Canon M50, which I think is a game changer. The M50 came out about a year ago, I heard about it, I saw it on people reviewing on YouTube. I thought it was cute but not a real filmmaker's camera and, you know, I was wrong. I got my hands on one a couple of weeks ago, I'm still up here in Vermont. I didn't bring much in the way of film gear, so I thought I would just play around with it and see what I could get. And it turns out that it's absolutely fantastic for a bunch of the stuff I do. I'm able to take really high quality stills on it. The stills are as good, if not better, than my Canon 5D Mark II. I'm able to take really great video on it. It has face-chasing autofocus. It has an external mic, the Rode video mic I'm using right now that fits into the hot shoe. It has a heap of custom controls. You can change ISO aperture and shutter speed, obviously, but you can also have them on automatic and set ranges where the camera will adjust, but then it won't go beyond if you're worried about ISO going too high. It comes with some awesome inbuilt Canon color science. It doesn't have C-Log, C-Log 2 or C-Log 3. It does have the ability to load a picture profile, so I loaded a custom C-Log EOS picture profile from my 5D Mark III, and actually the colors look pretty good. I ended up not shooting with it as much because I ended up using the inbuilt picture profiles more than I used my own custom one, just because it's easier for monitoring. This camera doesn't have a inbuilt, you know, waveform or false color. I didn't bring an external monitor to monitor it, but it does have this great flip around screen, which is something the DSLRs don't. I was surprised how good the audio on this thing is. I haven't got the microphone right next to my mouth like I usually do on my C200 videos. It's still really usable. The camera also has like a lot of mirrorless cameras, a stabilized sensor. What are the downsides? This isn't a 4K camera. Technically, it is. You can set a 4K, but then it then crops the video into somewhere here, and I just found that with already a small sensor, which we'll talk about in a second, the crop was just, you know, kind of unusable. Yeah, the sensor size is small, meaning that you're going to need a very wide lens if you want to get a wide shot. You know, what would normally be a, and God don't quote me on this, I'm just pulling these numbers out of thin air, but if you wanted like a 25 mil shot on your full frame DSLR, you're going to want like a 16 mil on a camera like this, because the sensor is so small. The lens that the camera comes with is a 15 to 45, or at least the kit that I got did. It's not a constant aperture, it changes, but it's fast enough for most stuff, I would say, definitely for still photography. You can go out and get other Canon M lenses if you want to get something super shallow depth of focus, or something that has take much better low light photos. But for, you know, the YouTube videos that I've done here and the other little bits and pieces that I did up in Montreal while I was in Vermont, the lenses work great. I didn't find myself needing anything. It doesn't have ND, it doesn't have internal ND like the XC cameras do, the XC 10, the XC 15, but you know, you can always get a screw on filter for the front of the lens. But the biggest advantage is this thing is tiny, it fits in your pocket. It's just so travelable, so portable. It's just something to have on you and it's not slow, like you can take multiple 5,000 by 4,000, I think it is the raw size, still frames a second. It's just the camera that you have is a lot better than the camera that was at home because it's too big to bring. And the trouble with point and shoots traditionally is that they're not good enough quality to warrant bringing both your phone, which already have to bring and them. But I would say that Canon has looked at that problem and has really aggressively marketed this thing. It's $600, $700, depending on what kit you get. And it takes epic raw stills. It takes really great video with a whole bunch of controls that you wouldn't have on your iPhone. And all in all, just like a really great unit. I wouldn't call it a A cam or a B cam, I call it a C cam, something that you can throw in your bag when you're going away for a weekend where you might not want to take photos, but it's great to know that if you see an amazing sunrise or you stop at a really beautiful place that you didn't know you were going to get, or you meet someone really interesting that you can take photos or take video of them and still have it good enough quality to use in your regular work. At least that's my perspective. The sensor of this camera is tiny, but it is 50 times bigger than the sensor of an iPhone. And it really does make a difference. I believe you can get a M to EF adapter if you're going to bring this camera along with your DSLR or cinema camera and you want to use the same lenses. Getting the M50 means getting M lenses, which are a whole different range. But I have to say that the jump into this camera was a lot better than the Fujifilm XT2, which came with all different kinds of menus, was a prettier camera, looks a little bit more like a Leica, but was a lot harder to learn the features of and get to use. Whereas the M50 straight out of the box, I didn't even need to look at the manual. I just knew where everything was because it's the same as my cinema and DSLR cameras. M50 has a flip around screen for vlogging or for doing things like this. Whereas the XT2, I believe it kind of flips up and down, but doesn't get all the way around. It doesn't articulate to that extent. That's my look at the Canon M50 mirrorless digital and video modes. I really like this camera. I really plan to shoot a bunch more with it. Thanks very much for watching. Leave your questions in the comments and I will see you next time.