It is time for this debate as it is being said on International Day of Women and Girls in Science. PowerPoint of order. Presiding Officer, I am aware I made a point of order this afternoon on business in Among the Office for Education and Skills for the Cabinet Secretary. I would like to point out in the Spirit of Fairness that I am grateful for the very direct and immediate intervention of the Office for the Administgeons of Parliamentary Business, rysgwlad o'r rhaid i'r ddaisgafolau rai, ac mae gafodd ddau oedd wrth gael ddau, rydyn ni'n rhaid, ar 25 ddau. Felly, rydyn ni'n ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau i'r ddau, ac rydyn ni'n ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau i'r ddau'r ddau'r ddau, i ddim yn cymdeithasol i gyd, fyddai'n gweithio ychydigrwyno ar gael. bob amddwg yw'n gwybod a'i dweudhaeth wrth adeiladau ti'n gweithio'n viadfaith ynndyn y gwerth iawn. Onw'r regimes yma yn angen ei amdannu gan chi, a ddim yn dweud sut yn ei cynnig. Mae'n fwy mwyn o'i cymateb cydweithio i'r lleol, lleiannol i'i cydweithio i'r lleol. Mae'n fwy mwyn o gen i chi, dweud amdannu'n llyth i chi'n gweithio i chi'n cymryd cyfan ein cydweithio i'r lleiannol, I invite members who wish to speak in the debate to press their request-to-speak buttons. I call on cabinet secretary John Swinney to move the motion. I would like to draw the Parliament's attention to the procedural connection between this debate and rule 9.16.7 of the standing orders, which states that the Scottish rate resolution must be agreed before stage 3 of the budget bill is able to proceed. This rate resolution debate is set against a backdrop of one of the most challenging periods for the economy and public finances that we have seen since devolution almost quarter of a century ago. Over the course of the last year, we have seen Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine, a cost of living crisis, spiralling inflation and a continuing economic impact from Brexit, all while recovering from a global pandemic. We have been forced to navigate all of that essentially with our hands tied, giving the limited fiscal powers at our disposal. Not only are we unable to borrow to support businesses and households in these challenging times, but we also have no legislative powers over key policy areas that would support the wider economy such as the energy market and immigration. Therefore, in the 2023-24 budget, we have taken the difficult but necessary decisions to allow us to protect our vital public services, upon which so many households, communities and indeed the Scottish economy relies on. We will cautiously support the resolution today, but since it is an emergency, we understand the need to protect the public finances. However, if the public finances improve and the economy improves, is it the Government's intention to restore the lower levels of taxation before this resolution? Minister, I want to thank Mr Rennie for his support for the resolution, for his constructive engagement and indeed for his enthusiasm when he wants to start talking about the 24-25 budget at this stage. As I am sure he appreciates, we will set out decisions on tax policy at each budget in turn, which will take into account a number of factors, including the prevailing economic conditions. However, at this point, vital and now more than ever, we are guided by the principles of our framework for tax, which we published in December 2021, and one of those principles is engagement. That is why I heard of the Scottish budget that the Deputy First Minister and I listened to a range of stakeholders, and we thank all those involved for their input. We heard a consistent message from our engagement that we need to use tax powers to support and invest in our public services, to reaffirm our commitment to reaching net zero emissions, tackle child poverty and to support the economy. Our income tax policy for 2023-24 responds to that, seeking to strike a balance between ensuring that there is enough money for public spending and acknowledging the challenging economic conditions facing households and businesses, and to support Scotland being a great place to live, work, study and do business. Our proposed income tax policy for 2023-24 is for there to be no changes to the starter, basic or intermediate rates and bans to protect those on lower incomes. We also propose no change to the current higher rate threshold of £43,662 and lowering of the top rate threshold from £150,000 to £125,140. Finally, we propose raising the higher and top rates of tax by one pence, bringing them to £42 and £47 respectively. We have estimated that the income tax policies that I am asking members to vote for today will raise an additional £519 million for the Scottish budget in 2023-24. Those policy changes that are grounded by our principles of taxation will enhance the progressive approach to tax that we have taken to date. The majority of additional revenue raised from those changes will come from those individuals and households in the top two income desiles. Our approach will mean that we can continue supporting our leading social contract with the people of Scotland while ensuring that the majority of taxpayers still pay less in income tax than if they lived elsewhere in the UK. Crucially, as set out by the Deputy First Minister in his budget statement in December, the changes announced for 2023-24 mean that we will be in a position to exceed the health resource abarnate consequentials received from the UK Government with substantial additional investment for our national health service. Our NHS is a precious public asset, and by choosing to raise more revenue from tax to invest in vital front-line services, we are making an investment that will benefit all of us. I would like to close by reminding members that not only have we had to make these income tax policy choices in the difficult economic climate that we face, but within what has been frankly political chaos set by the UK Government in the past year. 2022 saw a total of four UK chancellers in the space of four months. We saw constant new turns on tax policy from UK Government ministers, and we should not forget the ill-judged tax cuts from their short-lived and mini-budget in September and the impact on financial markets that many in Scotland are still facing as a consequence. That chaos presented significant challenges for developing our transparent income tax policy in Scotland. The UK Government's financial plans look increasingly bleak, and there is no doubt that that will present significant fiscal challenges for us here in Scotland. The OBR estimates that the UK has entered the recession, but will last for over a year. Just last week, the IMF suggested that Britain will be only the only G7 economy forecast to shrink in 2023. This Government is clear on what its priorities are. We are choosing to invest in the economy, to invest in our leading social contract and to invest in the people of Scotland. That is why I ask members today to vote to ratify the proposed changes to Scottish income tax set out in the budget 2023-24. I now call on Liz Smith. The minister is quite correct that there is a convention in this Parliament. It is rule 9.16.17 of standing orders that a rates revolution absolutely must be passed before stage 3 of a budget process so that that can happen. I think that it is very clear that there are strongly different views about tax policy. In fact, I think that Mr Rennie has just opened up another difference of tax opinion. I will be interested to see what he is saying this time next year about liberal party policy. We do have that difference of opinion, but of course there is the restraining order upon us that if we were to vote against a resolution it does actually mean that we would be prevented from collecting any tax of whatsoever. Of course, I think from that angle that, particularly just now, that would send out an irresponsible message because it means obviously a time of great economic difficulty and of people who are under the caution with raising sufficient revenue. That is a difficult thing and I think that it would be irresponsible to vote against it so I can put on record that we will not be opposing the rates resolution, but I do want to put on record that we have very considerable differences of opinion with the Scottish Government about tax. Now, Presiding Officer, in recent weeks this Parliament has witnessed several debates, whether in the chamber or in the committee, about the economic priorities that will be required as we continue our efforts to tackle the very difficult economic circumstances that the minister has referred to. The fallout from the war in Ukraine, the many problems of supply change and energy cost labour markets and having to adapt to a post-Covid and post-Brexit landscape and, of course, the significant changes that happened with UK Government policy in fiscal terms. Despite our differences and the committee's report, I think that we have agreed on some main objectives in this, especially in relation to addressing the skills gap and retraining and in terms of encouraging different policies that will promote economic growth and also to ensure that we can do something about the labour market in flexibilities. I am grateful to both the cabinet secretary and to the minister for engagement on that basis, because there is a huge issue about people leaving the labour market post-Covid, either because of long Covid issues or because they have decided for one reason or another that they wish to come out of the labour market. We had an exchange at stage 2 and I do share the cabinet secretary's concern about that. Of course, we are especially keen in Scotland to ensure that it remains a very attractive place in which to work and to live and to invest, and I think that it is very important that that is something that is right at the centre of our delimination. I am grateful to Liz Smith for giving me an interest in the line of argument that she is developing, because essentially she goes into territory where the tax system can be utilised to try to create incentives, but she will appreciate that that is not within our range of responsibilities. Without me trying to make a big constitutional song and dance about it, does she accept that those are legitimate areas where additional flexibility might be of use in trying to address the very specific and real issue that she raises in relation to participation in the labour market? Yes, I do, cabinet secretary. I think that tax incentives are absolutely critical and we have had some considerable differences of opinion about the behavioural aspects of different tax policies, and that is something that I am sure we will rehearse again as time goes on, but you are quite right. It is important that incentives are very much part of the tax decision. Taxes, the decisions that you make about them, are very much about the choices that you have chosen. You have taken different decisions on tax policy from what we would like to see, and we are particularly concerned about what the Fiscal Commission's recommendations are about where we have to focus in light of the statistics that they have produced for the next few years, because there are some really worrying trends coming down the track for that. I think that there are a lot of issues that we have to think about. We also have to think about the fiscal framework, which is due to be renegotiated. The cabinet secretary signed that fiscal framework back in 2016, and I think that there is a lot of interesting debate to be had about that and ensuring that the fiscal situation for this Parliament is as effective in line with what the UK is saying to us. There is general agreement that there are issues about quite a lot of aspects of what we need to focus on. Obviously, the political debate is going to continue about how we address those things, but I can put on record again that we will not oppose the rates resolution when it comes to decision time. I would like to begin by saying that I thought that it was deeply unfair of the cabinet secretary to make the minister of finance chuckle as he got to his feet. Tax is a very serious business, and I thought that the cabinet secretary was a serious man, but I will put that on record. I am very happy to confirm that I was not in any way deliberately trying to make the minister chuckle. I was just somewhat discomforted by the fact that I was having to move the resolution. I thought that a speech was due to follow, but thankfully the minister came to my rescue a bit. In fairness, I think that that is a matter for the minister of finance, and we will hear from him later. In a sense, I am pleased to see those proposals come forward. Ultimately, what we are seeing is that the powers are granted by the 2016 Scotland Act being used. We have some £19 billion being raised directly by those powers exercised by the Scottish Government. That represents some 35 per cent of all revenues available and 44 per cent of revenue funding. It is important that we see that bit of the budget, that part that is under its control, being used and exercised. Indeed, the other day, the cabinet secretary described this as being in the foothills of variation of tax policies. I am someone who is pleased to see that. That is what devolution is about. I would also note that those are progressive measures. Tax is a part of the social compact for those who benefit from public services are asked to contribute. Those who have the ability to pay more do so. Scottish Labour will be supporting the rate resolution this evening. I note that the use of the top rate of tax was something that we called for back in 2019. That brings me to the next point. Reflecting but not necessarily completely mirroring the comments from Willie Rennie and Liz Smith, we need to look at the effectiveness of the powers. The behavioural impact needs to be studied. I suspect that they might be overstated, but we need to examine in detail whether or not the behavioural impact will take away from the mechanical increases that would have been predicted. Likewise, we need to look at the effects of fiscal drag, which I think is of concern to the finance committee. In particular, the interactions between the Scottish bans and rates and other taxations, particularly national insurance, which we have some anomalies now in our tax regime. Finally, we need to look at the fact that the inflection point at which we start paying more tax in Scotland compared to the rest of the UK is £28,000. That will take in people who are in promoted post and teaching profession nurses. We need to examine all those issues in the round and be evidence-led to ensure that we have a progressive taxation, but it is also effective. I think that it is important that we assess that. Ultimately, I believe that, while that is progressive, raising taxes is not a benefit in and of itself. While I absolutely support the right of the Scottish Government to have a different taxation policy from the UK Government, that is really important. If we are going to have a sustained higher level of taxation, we need to continue to test and challenge to ensure that we get commensurate benefit. I would seek to do that. Finally, the clear point of fact with the fiscal framework is that it operates on the basis of average tax receipts per person in Scotland and their growth being higher than the rest of the UK. If that is sustained, we have greater tax receipts and more money to spend in Scotland. I would say to the Scottish Government that we need an increased focus on growing jobs and wages, because that will ultimately be good for the exchequer in Scotland, but it is also good for Scottish people. We will be supporting the right resolution. These topics are ones that I would seek to explore in months and years to come as we explore tax devolution and tax variation in Scotland. I would like to start by picking up on an issue that has dogged our debates on taxation in recent years. It has not come up this afternoon, but it did during last week's debate on the budget, and I did not have time to pick up on it then. It was whether or not Scotland is better off as a result of income tax devolution. We are all at the stage now where we recognise that, as a result of the specific arrangements in the fiscal framework, it is true to say that, in recent years, Scotland ended up with less revenue to spend on public services than if income tax had not been devolved. That is completely separate to the question of whether or not we have benefited, our public finances have benefited as a result of the changes that we have made to income tax through that devolution. It is absolutely true to say—I will come on to this later on—that our public services have substantially benefited from the progressive changes that we have made. I think that we benefit the debates that we have on tax in this Parliament to recognise the significant difference between those two, particularly when, I believe, there is a cross-party consensus on the need to reform the fiscal framework. As I said last week, despite the immense challenges, that is the greenest budget in the history of the Scottish Parliament, and that is funded in part by the most progressive tax system in the UK—a point confirmed just earlier today by the Institute for Fiscal Studies. By raising the higher rate of income tax and the additional dwelling supplement, the highest earners and those buying holiday homes and extra properties will pay a bit more to fund the public services that are so desperately needed during this cost of living crisis. Scotland has extremely limited devolved taxation and revenue raising powers. We certainly need more powers over tax borrowing and a more functional reserve, but we have an obligation to make the best use of the powers that we have. In 2018, the Scottish Greens worked with the Government to deliver progressive changes to income tax. We award the tax paid by the lowest-paid workers and increased it for those on higher incomes. Our public services are better off to the tune of £1 billion as a result of the progressive changes that we have made in the past couple of years. Given the monumental pressure that the budget is under and the need for high-quality public services during this economic crisis, we need to go further. I am proud of the agreement that we reached on those further changes, which will raise more than £1 billion for our public services. We might be in a cost of living crisis, one pushing many households to crisis point, but there are plenty of high-income and wealthy people in this country who can afford to pay a bit more. Those on the highest incomes can afford an extra penny on the tax rate paid on the top slice of their salary, and those in the position where they can buy a second home or a holiday home can absolutely afford to pay a bit more on that purchase. It is incumbent on those who are opposed to those progressive changes to both explain why they think that the most privileged people in our society shouldn't be paying a bit more right now and to explain what they would cut from the budget if they were to prevent those changes. I welcome in particular the contribution that Liz Smith made to this debate, recognising the challenges that would be posed by voting down the rates resolution and the position that the Conservatives have come to. I absolutely agree with the points that Ms Smith made about labour market participation. I would commend to the chamber the study by Sheffield Hallam University on this that found that there is a substantial number of people in Scotland, perhaps in the tens of thousands, who would like to work but are currently on incapacity benefits because they are unable to find the kind of employment that meets their needs as a disabled person. Those are not people who are trying to avoid being in work. Those are people who have not yet put the right employment support in place for them to join the labour market and for them to contribute to our public finances through their tax revenue. In the period leading up to the publication of this budget, both the STC and Unison produced their own papers on tax reform. Both sets of those papers advanced the principle that those who have the most should contribute the most. And while most of their specific proposals were for long-term legislative change, rather than for this budget, I believe that they deserve a large share of the credit for these immediate-term progressive changes to income tax and the additional dwelling supplement that we are voting on today. The long-term changes that they have proposed will not be lost as we move rapidly from one annual budget cycle to the next. Despite the challenges, this budget delivers for people on planet. It includes a record £2.2 billion to tackle the climate emergency. It delivers more affordable public transport, it provides essential support to children and families, and it does so by having the wealthiest in our society pay a bit more. That is something worth voting for. Thank you. I now call on Alex Cole-Hamilton. Thank you very much indeed, Presiding Officer. Scottish Liberal Democrats have considered the vote on the rate resolution separately to that which will come on the budget after recess. In this debate a year ago, few would have predicted double figure inflation or that Vladimir Putin would invade the sovereign territory of Ukraine, and nobody could have foreseen the extent to which the incompetence of the Conservatives would trash the economy and the public finances. Public services have had to brace themselves against these winds. It has been a protection operation, in the words of Sir Anton Muscatelli, as he told the Scottish Parliament's Finance Committee. But it is essential to grow the economy, because Scotland has underperformed relative to the UK since tax powers were first to be involved. The Scottish Fiscal Commission believes that ministers may already be losing out almost £700 million of income tax revenue, and worse still, it is expecting Scotland's economy to grow more slowly over the next 50 years. Today, IFS analysis shows that average net household income will be reduced by £110 next year through the tax and benefit changes. The bottom third of households with children will gain on average around £1,200 a year due to the child payment, but poorer houses without children will, in the IFS words, see virtually no change in their incomes. They have rent-a-pay, rising food and energy bills, which is why we need to see progressive changes to the budget such as a new national emergency insulation programme. We have supported modest tax rises previously to deliver essential investment, and we will do so today as we are in an emergency. However, for those on the higher end, the cumulative effect of tax changes matters. Next year, someone earning £50,000 will pay over £1,500 more in Scotland than if they lived elsewhere in the UK. Somebody earning £150,000 will pay on with £4,000 more. These are talented people, and we are already short of the consultants we desperately need in our NHS, cyber analysts, tech innovators and the best engineers. I do not believe that one-off defined and limited tax rises have a significant impact on behaviour, but they need to be confident about the future intentions of governments. I think that is where the intervention of my friend and colleague Willie Rennie came from. If they think that they have lost control of the tax rises, the confidence drops and that affects that behaviour. When these individuals come to way up where they want to live and work, it could cost us dearly if the Scottish Government has lost that confidence. They are mobile and there are opportunities elsewhere in the United Kingdom. It is an imperfect science, but I am not convinced that the Government understands what they are thinking and their behaviour really matters to that tax take. Where is that evidence? I think that higher tax payers are worried about the long-term intentions of the SNP Government. The presence of the Greens does not reassure them. It adds to the uncertainty about the direction of taxation and the perception that the Government may go much further and take tax to extraordinary levels. They do not know what is going to happen next. The social contract is also being stretched by Government incompetence. The ferries have become a symbol of that, then the Scotland wins the best chance for generations to bring serious money into the public purse, but Scotland's prize seabed was sold on the cheap. I fear that the national care service will be the next shambles. I worry that we are coming to a tipping point that some will say that enough is enough. I am telling the Scottish Government today that you cannot guarantee our support if you bring forward further tax increases. Scottish Liberal Democrats fought for tax powers for this Parliament. When we proposed a moderate penny for education in 2016, it was for a defined purpose and period. It was designed to make education the best again, driving the economy and growth. Now there is a crisis in every corner of our NHS and social care. It is unprecedented, so we can see the logic in a penny, a further penny that is, for health at this moment in time. Putting aside the refusal of the SNP Government to acknowledge their role in bringing back— If you could please conclude, Mr Cole-Hamilton. You can see the necessity in fixing. I would like an answer from the cabinet secretary in their closing remarks. Will those tax increases remain if that health crisis abates? I do not think that that answer was given to Willie Rennie, so if he can find it in himself to give it to us in his closing remarks, I would be very grateful. Thank you and I call on Tom Arthur to wind up up to four minutes, minister. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I am conscious that it is me that stands between members and recess, so I will keep my remarks as brief as possible. I begin by thanking and voting across the chamber for their contributions this afternoon. I also welcome that no member is intending to vote against the SRR and welcome that pragmatic approach. If you could just give me one moment, I would be grateful if members who are just coming into the chamber could do so quietly and if conversations could cease. I will say just to build on the response that I gave to Willie Rennie's intervention in direct response to Alex Cole-Hamilton's question. He asks about what our future policy will be on tax and different budgets. As other members have eloquently summuried the very changed landscape that we found ourselves in over the past year, I am conscious that it was only three years ago that we became familiar with the term Covid and we still have three years to run until the next election. I think that members would agree that it is a sensible, prudent and practical approach to recognise decisions around taxation are best taken at the budget in line with a range of circumstances. I will give way to Mr Rennie. I completely understand that point. The world is unpredictable, but I hope that he understands our point about the balance. We need to have proper evidence to make sure that in future years we do not create behavioural change with a cumulative effect on tax and that we consider the possibility of reversing tax changes that we have brought in an emergency. I hope that he understands that. I do entirely. That speaks to the importance of the independent and robust assessment and forecast provided by the Fiscal Commission and the Government's own process of engagement. It is also hearing to the principles and objectives that are set out in our framework for tax. I recognise that the devolution of income tax affords us the opportunity to take a different approach in Scotland. Devolution affords us the opportunity to take a range of different approaches across a range of areas. Our powers over income tax and taxation more widely are central to enabling us to do that, to fulfil that commitment to delivering the best social contract that we possibly can. I would note the recent findings from the IFS report that recognise that the Scottish Government's changes to the income tax and benefit systems over the past six years will make the Scottish system considerably more progressive than that of the rest of Great Britain. I would also recognise that, from the same report, the findings that, since 2017, the poorest 10 per cent of households will see their incomes increased by £580, 4.6 per cent per year, compared with the rest of the UK, England and Wales, where the richest 10 per cent will see their incomes fall. Amongst the poorest 30 per cent, Scottish reforms to the income tax and benefit system are set to raise the income of households with children by around £2,000 per year on average. That is made possible because we have those powers over income tax. It also speaks to the point that powers are for a purpose and they can affect real change and, in this change, material change changes the circumstance that individuals on low incomes find themselves in. I conscious that we are out of time now, but I want to once again thank members from across the chamber for their constructive input and, indeed, to thank them for their support or at least lack of opposition to the Scottish rates resolution. That concludes the debate on the Scottish rate resolution. We will now move on to the motion. Rule 11.3.1 requires that the question on the Scottish rate resolution be put immediately after the debate. The question therefore is that motion 7853, in the name of Tom Arthur, on Scottish rate resolution be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and there will be a short suspension until our members to access the digital voting system.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasewrakes.com coming at you with our second to last Blacks party break. This is 2022, Panini 1 football, 10 box, half case, pick your team, number 7 from jaspyscasewrakes.com, big thanks to this group right here for making it happen. On Thursday the 20th, 2023, Alan you ended up with a last bottom mojo with the chiefs before we pulled the remaining teams out for that filler.  So congrats to you. Fresh case, half case, that's right, Carl, not only is there a wax party opportunity here, but the cards themselves, I think, really sweet, sharp looking cards. Ooh, someone helped Will out with that little project. Will is two cards away from completing the Griffey playing years registry in PSA 10. That's quite a project. Got the 2001 TOCS just missing 98 score and 95 donors. Always happy to try to help someone complete a set. So we've got a new camera where it automatically sets at a certain level, but I have to change it automatically. Anyhow, there's 10 on the left side, these two stacks, and 10 on this side right here. We'll roll the die, we'll go 1, 2, 3 on that side and 4, 5, 6 on this side, and then that's the side we'll do. 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, so this is the side we're going to do, this we'll save for the next break. Here we go.  Good luck. First out of the gate is going to be Vellis Jones Jr., three-color patch and autograph. That is 54 out of 9, I think this new camera has better zooming in capabilities than before. It's a little kind of bright, but I don't know what we'll figure that out. Anyway, Bear's, that's going to be for Ryan Hite, what's the next transcendent break coming up? That's what we're waiting for. Next one is, is Aidan Hutchinson, one of one, day one, one of one, nice, that's going to go to Chris, who bought the Lions straight up. Chris, all aboard the Big Hit Express, whoop, they call Aidan, you can wreck some games, turn the tide in some football games this year, I would imagine. Next up is, is Traylin Burks, 86 out of 99. That's Chris with the Titans, another team he bought straight up. What's my hot take for, you want a hot take? I'm not very good at hot takes, Sheila, my takes are very, very warm, measured, calculated, logical. Oh, look at this, once a pot of time, Roger Stalback. My hot take is, that's three out of five, by the way, let me do the train was the first Nathan. All aboard the Big Hit Express, whoop, Will says B-John Robbins and finishes RB1, Steelers beat Vegas, I don't know if that's that hot, that's probably going to happen. My hot take is, the last Vegas Raiders, as a wild card, wins the Super Bowl that's going to be in Vegas this year, Super Bowl is in Vegas this year, right, or this next year. This season's Super Bowl will be in Las Vegas. That's where they're going to win the Super Bowl. Devonte Adams will be your rare wide receiver MVP. We got another once a pot of time, that's Jake Plummer, 48 out of 90, and I like that I can kind of zoom in right here. We haven't had that capability in a little bit. I didn't say Jimmy G was going to leave the, that's going to go to James with Denver, that's why I said Devonte Adams is going to, no, I don't know what my hot take is going to be. I'm going to have to, my head is not in NFL mode to be honest with you. Broncos make the playoff, that's kind of a hot take, right, will definitely not being a homie. We got Kyle Hamilton, 56 out of 75, day one autograph. The camera kind of washes out my hands a little bit. I want the makeup department to fix that, Frank with the Ravens. I don't have any hot takes for the NFL season. Are there some, I don't know, I'll mess with these settings, some other good. Could be too long in the pool, yeah, the chlorine maybe. Here is Skye Moore, reach for the Skye. There's a snake in my boot, and that is 22 out of 35.  How much is this for a box? I'm not sure, but we're doing group breaks of these, so we sold them by team, Carl saying 350, we might have some of this available on our personal breaks channel on Instagram, they're live tonight at Jaspy's Breaks, if you wanted a box all to yourself. Could be a buffalo ear maybe, nixing Broncos, winning it all would be nuts. Aves, Nuggets, then Broncos, actually, yeah, maybe Denver is a city of destiny. Rockies to the World Series, could be a city of destiny. There's Alec Pierce, 48 out of 99 for the Blue Horses, Duel Relic and Autograph, and that will be for Nathan and the Colts. Oh, there you go, thank you Will. There's a price right there, Michael. Alright, next is Crystal Lave, nice. That is 13 out of 49 on Crystal Lave, Duel Relic, On-Card Autograph, Saints, Eugene, one that's spot in the filler. That would be a hot take, Jimmy G playing a full season. Jimmy G making 17 starts. Alright, 10th and final box, good luck. Second half to my right and in the store, jaskyscasebreaks.com, is going to be, ooh, the Wonders, Ladanian Tomlinson, that looks cool. Looks like an On-Card Autograph right there, which is also sharp. That is 5 out of 6, one off a train whistle, but still awesome. For Adam Copperman, there you go, Adam, bought the Chargers straight up. Nice. There you go. I'm Joe for jaskyscasebreaks.com and that was Panini, one football. Yeah, nice, nice LT there, yeah, he played for the, for your Jets for a little bit too. This is Chargers edition, but I went to one of the Jets for a few seasons, right? It's also a wax party, invite break, ladies and gentlemen, so let's flip back over to the main list. Let's gather everybody's names, 1 through 32, great Hall of Fame speech. I want to say, I liked Ladanian Tomlinson's Hall of Fame speech too. All right, there's all the names right there. Name on top, after 5 out of 6, we'll get an invite into the wax party, good luck. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11th and final time. After 11, fingers crossed, good luck, a lot of sad faces here. The saddest face of spot two, saddest face, saddest face even, okay, sorry Steven, appreciate you trying though. Next face though is the name on top after 11, and that's going to be John Jackson with the spot he won in the filler. Name on top after 11, congrats to you John, you got an invite to the wax party. I'm Joe for jaskyscasewrakes.com, I'll see you for the last wax party invite break and then we'll run that randomizer tonight, jaskyscasewrakes.com, bye bye.


Welcome back to the Julia Kalada show presented by Buffalo Wildwings I'm Sam Murray joined now with Stevenson softball head coach Julia Kalada and coach Three double-headers last week three splits and those three wins sophomore Morgan Fulton pitch really well Talk about her performing especially this late in the season. Yeah She has really come out strong for the past couple of starts as well as closing some of our second games She's throwing with a lot of confidence a lot of authority hitting her spots really well And we're getting a great game caught by both Alex and KK behind the plate to help her out So she's just doing a really great job keeping us in games I think she has a good approach of attacking batters, but also knowing her job Not anything fancy. Just keeping the score to a point where we can outscore the opponent. Yeah, and then at the plate We cannot not talk about junior Aaron Steffi in the six games last week in five of them She had multi-hit games. She's 18 multi-hit games this season talk about her performance hitting over 400 this year as well. Yeah, she's doing a really great job for us in the lead-off spot And a lot of the people in front of her in the lower half of our order like Caleb Riles have been getting on base for her as well She's done a great job in the field at the plate with the power numbers But we also have to know that she has you know double-digit stolen bases as well So she's doing a great job of doing what she can with pitches some of her hits are you know five six hole We have some home runs So she's just hitting the ball to all fields really well And then you mentioned stolen bases freshman Caleb Riles when she gets on bases is pretty lethal in that area She set the single season record with stolen bases believe she has 21 this year the previous record was 19 Talk about her rookie year. Yeah, I think she's having a great year She's made of a lot of adjustments and we know if she gets on first. It's an automatic double Can you just imagine how much more she can we can get out of her in the next three years? It's gonna be crazy, but yeah, she did a great job. I think she's 21 for 21 Most still is not even close, but I think she could get to 30 and beyond Maybe even add in a couple more this year for her. Yeah talking about this year only a few left You have Lycoming a conference doubleheader big conference doubleheader on Saturday And then a non-conference doubleheader versus York talk about those matchups Yeah, Lycoming is really crucial for us We need to go out play a really great two series games and sweep them to give ourselves Take care of us and give ourselves a shot for playoffs as well as we have a doubleheader Next Tuesday against a really good York team, which will be a good test a warm-up into the playoff round If we're so lucky to make it. We've had a really great season this year We've maybe not taken advantage of some of the the splits that we have had But I think overall with our power numbers and our offensive numbers leading in the conference that we're doing a great job Well coach, we wish you the best of luck and hopefully you get some softball in this weekend and we'll see you back here next week For coach Julia Colotta, I'm Sam Murray and this has been the Julia Colotta show


A former House of Representatives Minority Leader Dr. Wumi Bewaji has observed that the appointments made by President Balaamit Tinibu are not lopsided, contrary to insinuation in some quarters. Bewaji, who is the Executive Secretary Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reform, spoke against the backdrop of comments that Tinibu's appointments were concentrated in Yoruba Land, stating that he sees no lopsidedness here and insists on the appointments being fair and balanced. Joining us to discuss this is Are Dotson Hassan, he's a legal practitioner and President Yoruba Council worldwide. Dotson, it's so good to have you join us. Good evening. Great. Let's start by looking at Mr. President's appointments so far. I mean, the most recent of those appointments is the CBN governor, who is yet to be ratified by the National Assembly, and two young people, a Minister for Youth and a Minister of State for Youth Affairs.  And these were not just people from other regions of the country, these were people from the Southwest. What are your thoughts on that? Well, to really clarify, Ashurajibullah Khmer, you know, who is a digitalized Nigerian, is a man that knows his honours, is a man that chooses his disciples with a good heart. And he's not sentimental about the ways he's been appointing his cabinet. You can see from the spread of his ministerial appointment, definitely he picked in consonance with the national spread. And prior before now, his essays, his aides and all that are all from the North, from the East, from the South, South. I don't think there is a Legos voice to that, as far as his appointment is concerned. There might be some concern about all these guys are people that have been around. Ashurajibullah will never appoint a dollar. He will never even appoint, especially to, to, to oversee some sensitive positions that he knew to resolve. He would definitely go for the deck. And from the, from the world goal, looking at the FRS appointment, you can see these are people that have been as part of his inner cabinet and that is the, the, the FRS. But now we have the Caduto, the, the EBA. And then we've equally gotten on other appointments that are of other races within his cabinet. So most courageous enough to have given the, the North to ensure we have economic stability. Nigeria for a long time, we are, we are really here to feel the, the essence of democracy, the essence of governance. I can bet you we are really getting the, the much expected results of a president who understands both the foreign policy and the, and the, and is the local, is only in our governance properly. What results are you making reference to, if I might ask? Yes, if you look at the economic policy and the planning at that date and in terms of foreign direct investment assurance at that today, they just secured the Chinese North for the, for the real life, for a bigger real life. And we, and so, as of yesterday, even during the UN side meeting with ExxonMobil, with companies, with a lot of other interests, I think it's enough assurance. And it's giving confidence, it's providing leadership both at the, at the ECOAS level and also within the country. So leadership is very key in governance. That is one key thing that you must really salute the, the, the president for. The president is not running a one-man show and he's not running an ethnic pseudo-governance. We have witnessed what ethnic pseudo-governance means. So this is not a Yoruba government. There might be some level of people that have worked with him from the time past. Let me look at his SDF. The SDF is from the, the middle ground. So we are looking at how much he's been growing his office. You know that this is a man that understands the youth, looking at the arrays of youth. This is the government for the first time that price youth appointment. So go and look at the recent appointment of all the SDF. We are in the bracket of youth. I don't know how. Since, since you've gone to the youth part, I want to thank you for going there. You talked about the, you know, economic policy direction of the government. Might I ask what exactly it is? Because Nigerians are trying to understand what Mr. President's economic policy plan is. That's one. Secondly, with how bad our economy is and the downturn that we're facing with the post, you know, subsidy removal era. Why do we need a minister of youth and a minister of state for youth? How smart a move is that? Because you're singing the praises of the president all fine and well. But is that a smart thing to do in an economy that's very bloated already? Especially when we should be cutting the cost of governance. So governance is a system. Appointment of officials in key positions that needs to drive the government are very important. And in terms of the innovation Ashwaju is bringing, in terms of having minister of state in some places and at the same time guiding the ministry of transport to the economy and transport, that's of the youth to instill the need to balance the ties among the both the female and the male so that they can be and also to give the women a voice. So our best can we appreciate a president who in his wisdom believes that the economic blueprint that we have set down at the moment looking at the way the cleanup exercise is moving like a tsunami within the CBN you could, from your own look, go out the CBN, the recovery from the CBN at that date. We are also getting feel as Ashwaju gas is blueprint in pumping the real re-administration, re-overhauling of MNPCs. You can see how for the first time you can see how MNPCs already don't remitting in the traditional account. I'm so glad. I really appreciate you for helping me to go in the directions where I want to go tonight. Let's talk about the MNPC. It's a limited liability company now. It's supposed to do business and of course accrue monies, but let's leave that part. As of yesterday, Dangote has been said to import crude oil into this country. In the next two weeks they're going to take receipt of the crude. This is what the refinery is going to be refining. Yet the MNPC has told us that they cannot supply crude oil to Dangote because they have pledged the oil, our crude, to an African bank so that they can use it to pay loans. The average Nigerian is asking how the MNPC is working to benefit Nigeria and Nigerians and to ameliorate our sufferings even after we've taken out this subsidy. Help me make sense of this move by the MNPC to send our crude out of the country. They have not been able to tell us who and who they're giving this crude, apart from the bank whom they have said allegedly they want to give in payment of loans. The other entities, they have been tight lipped about it. How is this going to help us and our economy that again is in a state of limbo? Well, before now, I think one of our own positions from the table of your back house worldwide, and I like a lot of like minds is the fact that the way the MNPC is currently positioned is highly opaque, invested with a lot of corruption. And for the fact that Mr. President is wanting to get it right. I believe you understand his game plan. In view of the question to that effect, for me, my first advice is that there is a new for total cleanup of the MNPC. I will not give the total note that the MNPC has really met the expectation of Nigeria for many years down the line. MNPC has always been to me as just like an ATM to some chronic corrupt elements. And in view of the fact that he's a president, we still need to let him know that he is not just booting out the MNPC. But there is a need for total audit as what we are getting of the MNPC. But as far as the MNPC making the entire oil and gas sector a collateral to a bank without appropriate admittance by the National Assembly. Because for you to guarantee the national aspect, because a whole lot of these are just coming out under this administration. Meaning these have always been in existence in the previous administration. And it shows the fact that there is still much needed intervention. Much needed intervention beyond the fact that the president is coming up with a policy driven plan to ensure that both the oil and gas and the petroleum sector are divided. And there is a need for decentralizing the distribution refinery and all that. The refineries because we know as a day the country's refineries are yet to be on the capacity to work. But the surprises are given as well as a fact of the plan to re-overhaul the entire oil and gas sector. But for the Dalgothi to import and the need of the MNPC not to sell to Dalgothi, I believe it is a good policy plan by the MNPC. And that is why I want to advise Mr. President that there is a need to really shake up MNPC beyond just retiring those who are just 15 months to retire. But not just for them to retire. There is a need to really filter the entire MNPC that much. All the networks of the MNPC, there is a need for total audit. As you can remember, let me remind you, from years back, the former governor of Kaduna State Airways mentioned that from the day MNPC is established through this movement, they have not been sent in an audit of what MNPC is making. How come MNPC is now trying to show our remit money and trying to show some elements of our colleagues, some chameleonica positioning of themselves? It won't undermine the fact that we are not satisfied with the privacy of the petroleum products as I did due to the landing course and all the necessary things. But Mr. President, because the issue of oil and gas that is in need, because these are areas that concerns you and I, there is no way we need to begin to pass anyone in the back as to gas the own MNPC area. This is an area that we want the President to pay very much needed attention to firstly audit also to put a price, which we cannot continue to afford the over 600 dollar or proposed increment. But for the fact that MNPC is a private limited company, there is a need for us to really understand because there is still much nexus between the federal government and MNPC because the entire asset that the company is managing belongs to the federal government there. And from the exclusive listing of the constitution, this is still the asset of Nigeria. So MNPC is only playing a managerial capacity like a consultant to the federal government. But still holding and that is why as you are asking me these questions, I'm only trying to throw more life into it. That there is a need for President to ensure that there is reduction in the pricing of the oil and there is a need to also bring the exchange rate dollar rating of the country by ensuring the local market, by ensuring our refinery work. Because if our own refinery is working at 100% capacity, I'm sure there should be $15 per litre of oil. Okay Dawson, let me bring you back to what brought us to MNPC because we're almost out of time. As at yesterday or day before, we realised from some investigative reports that subsidy is not necessarily gone because as at August the federal government had paid $169.4 billion to subsidise fuel and petrol in this country. But Mr. President did make us believe that subsidy was gone. Again, there are several questions that need to be answered by Mr. President and those who work around him. I go back again to ask why do we need two ministers for youth? What are these two people going to do that one person cannot do? Should Mr. President not be thinking about reducing the cost of governance, working with a small group of people who can deliver as opposed to breaking the record of having so many people on his roster? This is your final answer as we wrap up. Well, to me I believe in view of the fact that the, let's talk about the cabinet. The cabinet is a balanced cabinet, balanced in the sense that the workings of the office of the president are especially considering the height of poverty that we have in the land, the height of the tension that we currently have in almost every sector of the economy. It requires, it requires reconstruction. Nigeria at the moment is undergoing reconstruction. This is not a matter of laying the batting of the former president, Muhammad Wari, and the batting of Ashouraju. Ashouraju is coming up with a new driving force. Okay. Trying to see all the necessary loopholes as far as the country is concerned. Well, we have to go Dutton. Thank you so much. Unfortunately, we do not have time. We've run out of time. Dutton Hassan is a legal practitioner. He's also the president of the European Council worldwide. Thank you. Always a pleasure to have you on the show. Thank you. All right. Well, that's it on the show tonight. I want to thank you all for watching. We'll be back tomorrow talking about the latest political stories and talking about development. I'm Mary Annaclone. Have a good evening.


We must remember that the Holy Spirit in certain sense inhabits everything in everyone in the universe, even unbelievers. So let me get this straight. Christians and non-Christians all have the Holy Spirit. Is that right? Not reading the Bible, not understanding how to read the Bible, not trying to execute a text which is to read something into the text and in many cases to make the text fantasy to make it say something that that was never even imagined in the writer or even the hearer of the text. That can be dangerous and we see that with people who are thoroughly unqualified to be on YouTube or in someone's churches or anywhere teaching the Bible. That applies to a person like an Isaiah Salvador. That applies to a person now it looks like maybe even a Dr. Sam Storms who might have had some respect but now when you hear what he's stating it calls into question whether we should even listen to what he said in the past on other things, even things that he may have been right about. In Isaiah Salvador's or any of the people that are looking to do anything they can to try to prove that their deliverance ministry that is them supposedly casting demons out of Christians is biblical. They will even resort to taking a text, twisting a text or believing something that is complete heresy and what I'm going to play for you of him repeating and even agreeing with Dr. Sam Storms if you don't see this as heresy well then also we would have to impugn your level understanding. This cannot pass and I would love to see if anyone is going to come out and rebuke him or if anyone's going to come out and and just publicly disagree. I doubt that that would be the case at least from folks in his camp because again the issue is not what the Bible says for them the issue is how can we make sure that you see us in the right light and again keep frequenting us keep following us keep subscribing to us and so forth but the scriptures are clear and what he's going to say has no biblical basis as a matter of fact as he reads this tell me if you can cite the scripture that he's referring to. The argument from 1 Corinthians 3 is based on the idea is getting good that a demon indwelling a Christian is a spatial and spiritual impossibility as for the former it's argued that there's not enough room that being for a demon to indwall Christian for both the holy spirit and a demonic being to coexist in the same human body he's already off to a bad start because no one is stating that the reason why a demon cannot inhabit a christian because it's not enough room no one makes an argument the reason for the demon not being able to inhabit a christian is because the holy spirit is there the holy spirit has now taken up residency in the heart of the believer it's not that it's an issue of not being enough room that's not the issue the issue is can this darkness dwell in a place that has now been claimed by the lord and is now a temple of the holy spirit before i get to where he agrees that everybody including unbelievers non-christians that would also include muslims that would also include atheists that would also include buddhas that would also include satanists that they also have the holy spirit before i get there let's just listen to this argument and take it apart it would be too crowded but this is the think of spatial beings in physical terms i would ask as i would as easily ask how can the holy spirit and the human spirit both dwell in the same body wouldn't that be just as crowded mary magdalene had seven demons inhabiting her the gathering demoniac was inhabited by about 6 000 demons enough at any rate to enter and destroy 2000 pigs and if the presence of the holy spirit crowds out quote unquote crowds out demons then demons couldn't exist anywhere because the holy spirit exists everywhere it's not that sin can't be on earth it's not that unholy demons can't be on earth uh even though the lord's spirit prevails all over the earth that's not the point the point is that in a holy temple or in this case a vessel that's been set aside and has the spirit inside of us because remember that's been the issue all along men walking around on this planet not having the holy spirit in them that compels them to come closer to christ that's been the issue and goddess promised that that is what's going to happen and when it does there is no more fellowship with light and darkness did you guys just see that what he just said here look at this what if the presence of the holy spirit crowds out demons then demons couldn't exist anywhere because the holy spirit exists everywhere that's powerful because people say well how could a demon and and the holy spirit dwell in the same place well friend the holy spirit dwells everywhere how could a demon dwell anywhere if that's the case if that's the case poor logic how could a demon dwell anywhere that's a good point there some of y'all should use that argument the difference of the presence of the lord being somewhere versus being in something is two totally different things the presence of the lord being before someone or someone before the presence of the lord or that spirit of the lord also being in someone is a completely different thing the second argument is that this would be a spiritual impossibility that is to say how can the holy spirit inhabit the same body with an unholy demon but again we must remember that the holy spirit in certain sense inhabits everything and everyone in the universe even unbelievers of course in the case of the latter he does not indwell them in a saving or sanctifying way now you heard that that's him saying now he's reading from sam storm but he's in agreement he says in a sense the holy spirit is in everyone else as well is that true let's listen to him again let's make sure that i'm not taking him out of context you've heard what he said previously and let's think about this that is to say how can the holy spirit inhabit the same body with an unholy demon but again we must remember that the holy spirit in certain sense inhabits everything and everyone in the universe even unbelievers of course in the case of the latter he does not indwell them in a saving or sanctifying way the holy spirit does not even in a sense inhabit everything and everyone again that would mean that the holy spirit inhabits the non-believer the holy spirit inhabits the satanist the holy spirit inhabits muslims the holy spirit inhabits buddhas the holy spirit inhabits atheists the holy spirit inhabits this camera The Holy Spirit inhabits my computer. The Holy Spirit inhabits my cat. The Holy Spirit inhabits my dog. That is not true. That's borderline if not outright pantheism. That is complete heresy. What is the purpose of the Holy Spirit coming in the first place if he's already in everyone? Jesus makes this point about the coming Holy Spirit to dwell in us. It's been prophesied all throughout the Old Testament. We see it in Jeremiah. We see it in Ezekiel. We see it in Deuteronomy. We see it in Hosea. We see it in a lot of different places in the Old Testament. And then Jesus speaks specifically on this to the disciples as well in John 14, 15, and 16. In John 14 he says, but the helper of the Holy Spirit whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring you to remembrance all that I said to you. But not just in chapter 14. He reiterates it again in chapter 15 verse 26. He says the same. He says, when the Holy Spirit comes, when he comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, he will testify about me and he will testify also because you have been with me from the beginning. And so he's not saying that you already have him. He says you will have him. He will come. The identifying mark of every believer and only believers is that we have been baptized into the Holy Spirit. We all have the Holy Spirit in us. According to Romans chapter 12 verse 13, Paul, let's make it clear that all believers, all Christians have the Holy Spirit. But maybe if listening to them, maybe we should say that everyone has the Holy Spirit, including non-believers. This is, this seems to be a heresy to me. If I'm wrong, I would love for someone to point out the scriptures that tell me differently. The Holy Spirit is after all omnipresent. Okay, so again, this idea of how good a demon in the Holy Spirit be in the same place, completely unbased. What are you talking about? The Holy Spirit's everywhere. So this is him not just reading Sam Storm's writings, but also in agreement and then given his own analogy. He is in complete agreement. Now, I don't know if he necessarily knows what he's saying. Maybe he's just going along with it because it helps him to make his point that demons can be inside of Christians, which helps him to bolster his point that you can cast out demons, which is all he seems to do is cast out demons out of Christians. But again, I'm still waiting for the text, the scripture that they point to. That's like saying the Holy Spirit can't come into a club because there's demons in the club. What do you even mean? Of course, the Holy Spirit can dwell where there's demons. The Holy Spirit, after all, is omnipresent. I hope some of y'all are getting set free here. Some of you just, you will never be convinced, so you could just continue to live however you want to live. But there's some of you that are actually here for truth and you want to be convinced and you're interested in this stuff. Which is rich because if you want truth, then why not go to the scriptures? Why not lean to what the scriptures say, but you just simply don't? Again, tell me if you've heard the scripture. Maybe I've missed it, but so far I have not heard the scripture. And I'll go ahead and provide a link to the actual article that you can read for yourself and see does he cover this? No. And every time that Sam Storms mentions anyone having a demon in them that's going to be cast out of them, none of those people, none of those examples are someone who has the Holy Spirit in them. Not one, which is an argument they cannot make unless they write another scripture or unless they twist the scriptures even more so. He dwells everywhere. And again, this is not me. This is Sam Storms. So this is his writings. And though it's Sam Storms writings, you concur. You're adding your own analogies to it to most of the point. And you're saying that people who understand this will be set free. No, you are deceiving people. Whether you do it intentionally or unintentionally, I'm starting to believe that it's probably more intentional, but it's still you promoting a heresy. You may also recall from the book that you may also recall from the book of Job that Satan had access to the presence of God, indicating that the issue is not of spatial proximity, but of personal relationship. The Holy Spirit and demons are in close proximity when outside of the human body. So why would they not be in close proximity while inside the human body? Finally, the Holy Spirit and dwells the Christian even though even I'm sorry, the Holy Spirit and dwells the Christian even though the latter still has a sinful nature or sinful flesh. In other words, if the Holy Spirit can inhabit the same body with an unholy human sin, why could he not inhabit the same body of someone with an unholy demon? There's two points about what he just made. First, how in the world does a person who claims to have the Holy Spirit, who claims to walk in the power of the Holy Spirit, not recognize or not defend the power of the Holy Spirit in someone? Clearly, all of us who have the Holy Spirit and all of us who are truly saved know that the Holy Spirit in us, there is a difference. He causes something different. The life that we have prior to the Holy Spirit, our walking, our talking, our thoughts prior to the Holy Spirit, is vastly different than after receiving the Holy Spirit. That just cannot be overstated, nor could it be overlooked. The fact that he or anyone else would undermine the actual power of the Holy Spirit. Why would someone claim to know the power of the Holy Spirit yet dismiss the power of the Holy Spirit in a believer's life? That's the main reason why a demon cannot dwell in the same life inside of a believer because of the power of the Holy Spirit. And then secondly, one of the problems that people come up with or don't think this through is that because you sin, your sin is not a result of a demonic influence. Now, can a demonic influence kind of exacerbate it? Sure, without question, especially if you're not a Christian, but even if Christians have the Holy Spirit and can they still sin? Well, sure, because what's causing the sin isn't a demon. What's causing them to sin is the flesh. Think about it. The very first two people on the planet to sin, to err or depart from what God's word was, was Adam and Eve. They did not have a demon in them. They did have a demon speaking to them, namely the devil, but they were not demonically possessed. What he did was distort the word of God, which we see here. And also what we see are them appealing to their own desires. Adam and Eve didn't sin because they were demonized or possessed or oppressed. They sinned because they simply wanted to. It's the flesh. Remember what the Bible says about the flesh in Galatians 5 16. He says, but I say walk in the spirit and you will not carry out the desires of the flesh. Notice he's not saying the desire or the whims or the unction of a demon, but the desires of the flesh. He says, for the flesh sets its desire against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh, for these are in opposition of one another so that you may not do the things that you please that you please. And so that if you are led by the spirit, you are not under the law. Now the deeds of the flesh are evident and I won't cover those deeds because you can scream yourself, but it's not saying the things of a demon. These aren't the desires or the whims or wishes of a demon. This is the desire of the flesh again. We have this flesh and there are certain things that we want to gratify in the flesh. But if we are being led by the spirit, which we have always appeared in us, then we should not do those things. The difference is the person who has the spirit will be led by the spirit versus the person who does not have the spirit. Again, that goes counter to this new thought from these people that everyone, including unbelievers, has the spirit within. They can also be led by the spirit by that same logic. It strikes me that the force of this argument appears to be more emotional than biblical. Thank you, Sam Storms. When are you going to be on the podcast? It strikes me that the force of this argument appears to be more emotional than biblical. People always emotionally react. Pastors get emotional. Oh, how could a demon dwell on the same?  So how do you know what anything about demons?  You're not thinking of eternal spiritual dimensions. We're talking about an unseen realm that has no space. How could a demon and a holy spirit be in the same area? We're not talking about spatial. We're not talking about your bedroom. So it's an emotional response, not a biblical response.  They never have as well. But then again, I will take in place myself as well as hundreds of other men of God who have shared the gospel and seen people delivered compared to theirs. But more to the point, you stated that this is an emotional argument and not one that's based in the scripture yet. And still you did not give an actual scripture. There is no biblical basis. And yet what he'll do is he'll cause his audience to agree with him, not reading, not thinking that this is indeed, in fact, what they're saying a biblical argument, though, there's no recitation of a biblical verse. It is that side that is more emotional and not biblical. Again, this is complete heresy. This is wrong. And someone's going to say, why are you always bringing up what this person is saying or what others like him are saying? Because they keep bringing up these heresies. They keep doing things to harm the body. When you sin, it's not the result of a demon. It is the result of your flesh. How do you bring that under control? How do you want to have? How do you have peace? If you indeed want to have peace, do you want to have peace? Do you want to be made whole? Well, then the first step is to go to the actual deliverer and then watch him set you free, whom the sun sets free. Guess what, guys? Jesus said and he meant it, you are free indeed, without question, thoroughly, completely. And it's continuous according to the tense of the verb that's used there. And so to say otherwise, one would be a lie. But then also to say that other people have the exact same thing as you. Notice what Paul says in 2 Corinthians 6. He says, Do not be bound together with unbelievers for what partnership has righteousness with walllessness or what fellowship has light with darkness or what harmony has Christ with below or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever. Well, according to Isaiah, according to Sam Storms, a believer has everything in common with an unbeliever. We have the same Holy Spirit. But according to Paul, that's not true. Or what agreement has a temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God. Just as God said, I will dwell in them and walk among them and I will be their guide and they shall be my people. Therefore, come out from the midst of them and be separate. But according to them, this also applies to an unbeliever. They may not say that applies to them, but when you make the statement that the unbeliever also has the Holy Spirit in them, just not in a sanctifying fashion. Well, what is the Holy Spirit doing in them then?  Is the Holy Spirit in the unbeliever, in the Satanist, in the atheist? Is he sitting there just taking pictures? No. The reason for the Holy Spirit comes in us is to cause us to move and to keep the commands of the Lord, according to the prophecies from Jeremiah, from Ezekiel, from Deuteronomy, from Moses. So my friends, do yourself a favor. Do not listen to people who can one, cannot back things up with Scripture, but to have a point to prove and to do so to the detriment of the people that listen to them. These people are not interested in someone being delivered because if they were, then everyone around them would be delivered. But what we see are people who have no idea or control of the Scriptures. Now, if I have, if I'm wrong and there is a passage that tells us or passages that tells us that the Holy Spirit is in everything and the Holy Spirit is in everyone, including the Muslim, including the Satanist, well then I'd be willing to listen. But until then, I have no other choice but to assume that these people who are promoting heresies and do so gladly, I've got to put them in the category of a heretic.


Llywodraeth James Digby ddigbyr i'r Llyfrgegrwydd, ac rwy'n dweud am ein locon a'r Llyfrgegrwydd. Rwy'n dweud am ein locon a'r Llyfrgegrwyddau Llyfrgegrwyddau. Rwy'n dweud yng Nghymru, mae'n dweud yng Nghymru sydd o'r bydau a'r real trwybr ac yng Nghymru sydd o'r pwladenol ar y strategaidd yn taethafol ymlaen. Cymru'r Llyfrgegrwyddau, mae'n dweud yng nghymru ymlaen o'r Llyfrgegrwyddau ac yng Nghymru fel yr anru. I'm one of the commanders that are moving the simulated units and reporting back what we see on the ground to our planners up in HQ. African Lion is a multinational annual exercise conducted by US AFRICOM. It involves international partners, takes place across a few countries, and it's against a near-peer enemy in a fictional scenario where we practice warfighting. So, in terms of operability, we've got a British contingent and we're working to an overall US and Moroccan combined task force. That's on a high level, but on a low level, I sit on a desk with an American colonel, a Moroccan colonel, and a few captains of each. I'm interacting with Italians, Dutch every day. We're getting food together, we're talking together, learning about each other's systems. So, both professionally and personally, it's all about creating those relationships. African Lion tests our ability to be able to deploy against the kind of enemy that we haven't fought in a while. We always need to be preparing for the worst-case scenario, and strategically, we are best placed to do that by practicing large-scale exercises such as African Lion. It's a great feeling working alongside joint-nation partners. I've deployed with Americans before, I've never worked with Moroccans before, or Italians or Dutch. It's something we do every time we deploy, and it's always a good time. We always have a laugh about the different things we eat and the different way we say things, but we always come away with hopefully a few new patches, a few new stories, and a good sense of a relationship between the nations. I joined the Armed Forces because I was ambitious, I wanted to travel the world, I wanted to make a difference, and I wanted to work with people that I admired. So far, I've gone to a few places, I've done a few things, there's much more to be done, there's a lot more places I want to go, so that's why I'm in the Army.


Can you say bride, drew, and glue? Well, if you can, and the resulting words are clearly identifiable, then you don't need my advice. But if the result is somewhat like bride, drew, and glue, or even worse, pride, true, and glue, then you have a problem with voice plosives, followed by a sonorant consonant at the beginning of words, that is, with voiced onsets. And this is a typical problem that applies to many Germans, even in their own mother tongue. Test yourself. Do you say Grieche when you mean Grieche? Do people understand Dreck when you mean Dreck? Or do they even hear the name Glas when you want to refer to Glas? Got the problem? Even though the initial voiced plosives in these words occur in both languages, Germans often seem to have problems with them in these special contexts. And this is a problem that also occurs when they speak English. So, what can we do to solve this problem? Well, the solution is quite simple. Practice these words, but use a nasal consonant that is homo-ganic with a plosive in front of it. So, bride becomes bride. Drew is slowly pronounced as drew, and glue becomes englu. And once you can do this, just shorten the initial nasal until it disappears. Here are some more examples. Block, block, block. Brow, brow, brow. Drove, drove, drove. And glow, glow, glow. And grow, grow, grow. And so on. I hope my advice helps and you will produce truly voiced onsets from now on.


You must remember this.  Space Mountain is currently sitting at 105-minute wait. I checked for a fast pass, but the only thing that they have open is Aladdin's Magic Carpets. So, probably not gonna do that. I'm gonna keep on checking the app to see if I can get a fast pass for something other than the Aladdin Magic Carpets. But it's around 8 o'clock and the park closes at 11 so they are literally all booked up for tonight. All booked up! Just when I was about to give up, I kept on tapping that my Disney Experience app and you'll never believe it. I got myself a Winnie the Pooh pass. Oh, it's a food. We're after happening right now. The camera was shaking. That is awesome. What a beautiful view. Now I wanna ride something I have not done in a very long time. This beauty right here. I literally cannot remember the last time I rode this carousel. But I really love it. It's a beautiful carousel. Look at it. Which one do we take? This one looks good. Oh, yes, I like him. Oh, but what about him? They're all really, really nice. I don't know. What do you guys think? Number 74? Or should we go with number 2? Oh, I like this big guy. We weren't quick enough for the big guy. Oh boy, I'm like panicking. Okay, I found one right here. And I guess this is gonna be my steed for this evening right here. And how is your day today, sir? Going pretty well? Got a light load here. We're coming to a stop. Oh, it looks like we got off the carousel just in time for the projection show. Oh, I wanna see what it's like from here. That was actually pretty back there. But I still think the projections are best enjoyed staring directly in front of the castle. Just my opinion. So I know I said that there was gonna be snacks. And I really do need to eat. I'm actually starving. But there's not much to choose from. I'm over here in Liberty Square. And there's not like any desserts or anything like that. Oh, I do know something I can get that I haven't had in a long time. And what I decided to get, the turkey leg. Wow, this is something that is like a staple that I have not had in a very, very long time. I am not even sure how I go about eating a turkey leg. It's been so long. Gonna unwrap the paper. Give you guys a good look at this bad boy. Oh yeah, that is huge. $12.99. I guess I'm just gonna bite into it. Isn't something you can just walk around the park and eat. Especially while you're trying to film something. I'm gonna have to sit down or something. It's getting very difficult. Unfortunately, I had to give up on the turkey leg. It was way too much turkey leg. And it's very difficult to eat an actual vlog at the same time. So I decided to just throw out the rest. And maybe save a little room to get some dessert on the way out. That sounds like a very good idea. But first, I wanna go do pirate to the Caribbean. Yo ho, yo ho, adventure land for me. But before I get to my journey on pirate to the Caribbean, I wanted to pull over here and take a look at this beautiful courtyard they got here. This is just separate from the queue itself. Wow, it is so pretty over here, isn't it? Like, what do they even have this for? Just to have it? Look at that. So beautiful. I remember coming in here one time and taking photos. And it was amazing during the day. Oh, I can smell it. Oh ho ho ho ho. Nobody's here. I get to just peek around and look at things. How cool is that? Ah. A lesson I learned if you ever ride pirate to the Caribbean, avoid the outsides of the seats, because that's where the water comes in. So I'm gonna sit directly in the middle. Love me a little pirate. I love the smells. That's like the biggest thing I think. I don't know. As soon as I get a whiff of that, just rushes back good memories. Now we do have about 10 minutes left until the park closes. And from the way it looks over here, it looks like it's pretty dead. I think we're gonna try to go ride Big Thunder Mowen and hopefully get on without any weight. We can get a good look at the guys going to town on Splash Mowen up there. Under refurbishment, if you guys didn't know, they're literally just tearing it apart, ripping it apart. What? The Florida weather is not too nice to shingles and runes and stuff like that. So that's why it's important that Disney keeps up on the refurbishments here. And that's a little bit why Disney is so magical. That's how I feel. Oh yeah, Big Thunder Mowen. I'm so excited. And it looks like it's just a bottle walk on. Well, no lines until we got to this point. Oh, there it comes. That was definitely the wildest... Sorry, folks, park's closed. Walking out of Frontierland, I've stumbled upon probably the most inconspicuous bench right here. What is this even doing here? I like it, though. 22 seconds I sat on that bench for, but it felt like much longer. This big owl home? The Kisker Knight. Oh, that probably wasn't the best place to hear the Kisker Knight, but as soon as it started, I like froze and I stopped. I was like, oh no, Kisker Knight! And I just literally stood there and just watched. It's so magical. Literally one of my favorite things. If you end up doing a park close, just stick around to hear that once, because it really is magical. And I feel like that was a job well done tonight as Magic Kingdom. I actually had a great, great night. Oh, before I go, though, I did want to get a snack. A dessert snack. And if I'm looking for a snack, which better place than the confectionary? Oh man, there are so many things to choose from. Look at this jumbo Mickey sugar cookie right here. Oh, or they got a Mickey Mouse red short sugar cookie right there. Oh, I'm kind of torn. Ooh, what's this little striped sugar cookie down there? So many good things. I don't know. But take a look at those cake pots. There's a rose cake pop and then a Mickey cake pop. Decisions are going to have to be made. And actually, no decisions were made because I got them both. The rose one is chocolate cake on the inside. And then the Mickey one is the vanilla cake. So I was like, why not? Ears first. Wow. The ears were actually just marshmallows. We didn't even touch the cake part yet. The Mickey cake pop is going to be hard to top. But look at this. It topped the Mickey cake pop. There's like a little raspberry jelly in there, too. Oh man. Now my teeth are probably all chocolate. Love the life you live. We'll see you next time. Bye.


Have fun. Where's mine? Everywhere. Yeah, I covered it. Oh no I didn't say it. Did you? I never. Oh, only one. Where's yours? I've got like there, there, there, there, big one there. We covered them up pretty well. Oh, oh. You have that ankle tattoo, don't you? I do. And it says modest on it. Yeah. I guess I kind of have... But not like... On the movie! movie Crazy Rich kind of style. I mean I went to the Vendee Fair Hollywood Oscar party you know this year. That was pretty crazy rich. That's pretty cool. I hired an airport concierge to greet me. Oh you did that was too much. I hired the Warner Brothers hired them so. Too much. Warner Brothers didn't. Yeah I was at I was at the Gap and I got a both a large t-shirt and a medium t-shirt. Wow. Navy blue same and you know what I bought both because I'm just that kind of skinny fat.  Never. Oh cool.  We used to have like matching toothbrushes as kids and I used to put my brothers take my brothers by accident and I was just like what is this taste in my mouth. Not mine. Bad. Proud Lisa.  I my finger is my backup toothbrush. Really?  In like three months of what someone has been eating. Yeah that's my point. No. Okay. Now divulge a hidden hidden billionaire. No I've never. Yeah but you know what I'm open for invites. Yo. Aquafina at gmail.com. Nothing that I can repeat. I have good stories. I don't have I don't have visible talents much like secret ones.  I mean who doesn't have that. No I know. You know you can fight with your armpit. Right. Yeah that's just kind of like more just existence. Yeah whatever. More of a church thing.  I was at Comic Con in New York and Lucy Liu walked past a group of people and I absolutely lost my I completely lost my job myself. She walked past and I just blurted out I love you at her back and she turned around with a kind of I did the same with Andy Serkis like I'm a massive Andy Serkis fan and he was at this pre Oscars party and then we saw the Cinema Con in Las Vegas and I was just like I have to say hello to you I love you so much and he's the kindest guy. Mine's Mandy Ptinken. That speaks for itself. Oh my gosh. Yeah I would absolutely. Oh completely. I mean like I mean just so many actually like so many like like people who you you wouldn't suspect like maybe just comedians who I love back in the day like David Tell is one of my favorite comics. I love David Tell. And every time I see him like I just I just turned into mush. Yeah that's hard. Yeah it is real. It must have been a really good fun atmosphere on set. What's your sort of happiest or funniest memory from working on this epic comedy? I think for me definitely it was I mean it's it was the last day of set. We were filming all night shoots for the entire week. We were in Marina Bay Sands and we had all wrapped this massive wedding reception. The poor B camera crew had to go off and film like a sunrise and so they went on their own like we're gonna miss everything. Like 10 minutes later the entire cast and crew come and join them and we're situated at the the Merlion there in Singapore and we all just had this final sort of family moment and we saw the sunrise. It was just so so special. That was my favorite moment. My favorite moments were definitely any scene I had with Awkwafina. She and I we have the same sense of humor. We go places many jokes that we made were cut out but I mean we just had such a connection. She's a huge star so I was really excited to work with her. I had a scene or a couple of scenes with Lisa Liu an amazing actress who was in the Joy Luck Club which was the last film to feature an all you know an all Asian cast a Hollywood film. So yeah it was wonderful to have that continuity and she's she's got the wonderful energy. But a funny memory was that when we were filming in Langkawi at the four seasons we were kind of mugged by a group of monkeys.  It was like the monkeys in Wizard of Oz. So without wings.  No but we you know I remember meeting he was just a sweet guy and then we had this first scene together it's when Rachel comes to my house and I couldn't I couldn't do it man I couldn't it's so hard working with this guy he's so funny you know what I mean he's and it's and it's magnetic and everyone was breaking and it was very difficult to continue on the scene with this guy around. It is to to work with Nora who is exceptionally smart on so many levels and you could just see that it's lovely when you have a scene partner who you don't have to kind of explain yeah and then and we can just kind of read each other's minds. Yeah I'm like the best yeah.


What's going on guys, it's your boy DPJ here today with another Destiny video and today I could have some amazing news but then again it could just be a load of fan made bullcrap but it's definitely worth a cover in a video anyway but before we get into the video if you guys want to be in with a chance of winning this resurrectionist emblem simply drop a like on this video and tell me what your favourite past raid weapon is, a win will be picked in a few days so keep an eye on your youtube sub box, ok so just over a few hours ago I was tweeted this image right here you guys are seeing on screen now, it shows what seems to be remakes of all well most of the old raid weapons then from the water glass and then from the quarters end raid, now looking at them for the first time to me they do look legit but I just don't know, I don't know people have got so much time on their hands nowadays you just never know but I'll go through the weapons and the perks on them anyway and I'm sorry if you can hear the noise in the background of cars and shit it's really hot here at the moment I've got my window open but yes ok so the first one we can see is called beginning and end it's a hand cannon and these are obviously the water glass weapons or the remakes so the first one is beginning and end oracle disruptor this weapon does bonus damage to oracles in the vault of glass then we've got lightning firefly precision kills with this weapon cause the target to explode with arc energy I mean who comes up with these things it's just ridiculous then we've got a vision of separation obviously the remake of the vision of confluence it also has oracle disruptor and then it has zen eclipse causing damage with this weapon increases its stability and makes the next precision shot have solar energy because if you all remember the vision of confluence was a solar burn weapon possibly one of the best weapons ever to come into destiny then we have pre-deaths ending hidden lightning missing a shot from this weapons burst will fire a fourth shot with arc energy then we have a fiends introduction glass half negative the bottom half of each magazine causes additional damage and has void energy let me have kabah's companion pocket puncher precision hits will charge your melee weapon will be used as melee when equipped and will cause bonus damage that's just ridiculous I mean like like I said I've checked the database I cannot find these I've checked reddit I cannot find these I've searched Google I cannot find anything on any of these whether they've just been datamined or they've just fan-made I have no idea yet okay so let's move on to the crawler's end raid remake weapons we've got the word of taken obviously suggesting if these were legit that the crawler's end raid will return with taken themed okay so the word of taken obviously the remake of the word of quarter will have light this weapon does bonus damage to taken enemies then we have blighted gift rapidly landing three precision hits returns around to the magazine that does void damage then we have strings of ear yuts taken mark enemies that are hit with this weapon are highlighted and shown on radar better enemies that are marked will take arc precision damage by this weapon only then we have blighted edit blight breaker this weapon is bonus damage to taken summons and projectiles destroy taken vandal shields and cause bonus damage to blights and then we have the abyss taken taken leech bane this weapon has a chance to disorient taken wizards then we have focused hipfire this weapon has focused and hit fire at the same time precision shots will have solar energy and then we have string of blight connecting fate rapidly landing three precision shots will create a taken chase the orb that will go after the target works on multiple enemies and cannot be destroyed now these do sound legit and I mean if they are fake and our fan made it's taking a genius to come up with them I mean look at the images they look absolutely they look like they've been data-mined but like I said all in all do not get excited these could be fan made which I'm probably heading towards I mean because there's no leak from anywhere else and I can't find anything of any of these weapons on Google ready or in the database but still they are pretty badass if they are fan art and it's definitely worth me making a video to cover them anyways it's definitely worth you guys seeing these and checking them out now if you do know where these have come from and if you know who the creator of these if they are fan made let me know down below in that comment section and I will give all credit to them in that video description but yes guys let me know what you think about these down below in that comment section to me they're kind of look badass but yes I could be jump to conclusions I could be just over hype because I want not all rates to return but let me know what you think down below in that comment section hope you enjoyed the video thanks for stopping by as always and I'll catch you on that next one


So welcome along to Field Mill, home of Mansfield Town. Her response is necessary. It was disappointing the defeat against Harrogate Town on Monday evening. Clearance from Richard O'Donnell, who slipped, and it plays it straight towards Bowery. O'Donnell recovered well. It's fumbled by the keeper, and it's in for Bradford City! Corner from Connerwood came into the box. He won for him to collect, but he completely fumbled it. Novak plays it in behind. Harry Pritchard is in here. Can he find the back of the net? Pritchard still strong challenge by Mansfield Town, that cries for a penalty. Finds a Pritchard, lovely flick. The time whistle goes then here at Field. Cut with a shot from distance, and he had to be saved. Spread it out to the right with Huzanna. Gets his ball into the box, he's deflected, and it's nearly into the back of the net. And ball into what Pritchard in behind of these shots is toward. Comes it's towards goal and Mansfield Town have been able to pull one back. All time whistle goes here. Mansfield Town won brilliant, brilliant Bradford City 3.


I'm O'Brien. Welcome folks, this is Tom O'Brien of TFNN. We have five days a week, we go seven hours a day, we go 24 hours a day on the internet at TFNN.com. Always remember folks, whatever you think about, you bring about whatever you focus on grows. Hope everyone's having a great day, safe day. It's making a great night, folks. Always do your best, but don't overdo. When you overdo, you deplete your ball, you're gonna go and get yourself, and it'll take you longer to accomplish your goal. Macadamias, let's take a look at it out here. We have the Dow Industries up 60. NASDAQ's up 172, S&P's up 34. Goal contract up $3.80, traded 17.80 an ounce. We have Silver Dow in 47 cents, $21.63 an ounce. Light Sweet Crew up 72 cents, $86.60 a barrel. Notes and bonds, you have the 10-year note trading up 14 ticks, at 112.18. The 30-year, almost a full point, 31.6, at 124.20, and King Dollar. King Dollar down 200 to 17 ticks, trading at 106.444. The Euro is at 103. The yen is out here at 139, and the British Pound is at 118 to one US dollar. Our phone number's<PHONE_NUMBER>. Give us a call, folks. I know it's going on in your world, in the world of the S&Ps. Let's take a look at them. What do you have? Well, we take up the spy first. You're on a confirmed ABC structure in the way up. The PPI came in this morning, and, you know, futures exploded top side. We're going to have volume in the spy today. You know, the spy made it to 402, bottom line as the, you know, nine more points to make that 411. I expect we're going to make it, you know? And intraday, you know, as I just did in the update there, when you see what happened intraday, bottom line is that came down, tested a low of yesterday, dramatically lighter volume. This is in the futures now. You can see here, that's your spike. Your spike was coming into the close 10 minutes before the close. You had 126,000 contracts traded. You got the low of 39, 64. Well, when we came down, the first, even the first leg down, when the missiles basically hit Poland, and my understanding right now, you have two people that are dead, Palmer, bottom line. Even the first one was only 97,000. So it was 97,000 against the 126. Then your next bar had 76,000, and your low out there today had 76,000. So bottom line, that's telling me that you still want higher price, because when you do look, when we go to the volume for all the indices also, what you're going to see, and you've heard me say this a million times, bottom line, you got to a higher price.  NYSE, we're at 639 million, so that'll do over a billion. The composite though, the bottom line composite's got big volume. The composite right now, we're at 4.3. We're going to do 5.5, 5.6, something like that. So if you go over and take a look at it, we know that the composite has been the weaker indices. The bottom line is, guess what? It's the weaker indices, but now it wants a higher price. So bottom line was game up here for the composite. Again, it's 12,169, and we're at 11,375. Let's go to the note and bond market first, because I want to show you that the note and bond market are also making, my take, this would be a counter trend bounce, but it's powerful. Bottom line is that you got 1.5 million contracts today. It's not going to be an ABC up, because I believe we're coming into 2.6, let me see what that is. It's 2.5, 5.9, yeah. So it's not an ABC up, but when you just take the aspect of, so the way Fibonacci expansion contraction works, folks, is that the bottom line, you get a 0.382 or 5.06181, right? 0.382, 5.06181. Well, a 0.382 is a normal bounce in a bad market, and that's what it's doing. And so we'll see it, this thing was going to make a run to 113.29, and we'll see how that shakes out. If it bust it, guess what? You'll go to a 50% retracement, which is the 115.15. And if that's what you do, the bottom line is that the correlation is direct. The correlation is direct between interest rate structure, the US dollar and the US market. And if we take a look at it, this dollar right now today, it's intriguing here, there's no doubt. The dollar basically is trying to put in a little low here today. We got to 105.340, the swing point here is 104.636. You know, so we'll see where this ends up at the close, because if it does end up over 106.281, the volatility is going to continue, and it's going to basically grind all the way up. The thing that's intriguing here, okay, you know, when I was interviewing Steve Rhodes yesterday, he was talking about the aspect. He showed us, you know, all the lows that had come in established when he's using his program, right? And, you know, there's a couple more things that have to get done for the lows, but I can tell you, the way this market's trading, man, this is what normally does happen at major lows, you know. My take is that we still have the big ABC on the way down. That's where my head's at, you know, and it'll take quite a bit to break that. But this is how you do make big lows, meaning if you go, then it looks like it's going to fall apart, and then it comes right back, then it looks like it's going to fall apart and then it comes right back again. We'll see. We'll see how that shakes out.  My take's going to be, when we finish the ABC structure, you get into that swing point, as you get into that swing point, well, here, we can do this quick. As you get into that swing point, what ends up happening simultaneously, which should be happening, if that's where we go, is that we're going to see the dollar. The dollar will actually be down at this low. So if you get into the swing point, we're talking about the 411 and the S&P. If the dollar gets into the 101, that and you get into it and the volume drops off the cliff, well, that's the setup, man. And then we'd go to the bonds. And we go to the bonds simultaneously, so you'd want the bonds either at a 0.382 or 618, because then you'd have that triangle that's happening, and inside that triangle, your probabilities that the bounce is over, and then you can position yourself. But that's how I think, and that is the most deviant you can do. And you know what my saying is, folks, the market's price, the market's place is to take the most amount of money away from the most amount of people in the least amount of time, and guess what, if we do that, that's what's going to happen. And I'm talking about professionals. I'm not just talking about you and I. I'm talking about fly it out. The reason that that rally was so big is that the professionals were on the wrong side of this last week. We weren't, but they weren't. But the bottom line is that you get the gist of it. The Dow Industrial is right now up 52. You get the Nasdaq up 171. S&Ps are up 32. Walmart, man. It's talking about Walmart. Walmart killed it, man. The bottom line, Walmart, large ABC up, it's finished in one day. You know, it's a breakout of 20 million shares. You're up 10 and a half dollars. Stay right there, folks, who come right back.