Let's get this out of the way right now. I know it looks like someone actually busted on my face I got a cold sore.  I have to be on camera so much this week. Oh, it's so brutal, man It's so brutal.  Let's talk wheel of mud the script writers were in their duffle bag last season There's no doubt about that and although we're off to a rocky start at the start of this season It is the same script as last season, so I'm not that worried last season we started out Oh, and what however we did complete our challenge wheels, so we salvaged Fred Warner and amazing news They're dropping a 97 overall Jason Kelsey turns out this center prestige might have been one of my best prestigious ever dude I mean a 97 center is so good I'm almost a hundred percent sure they have not put that in the game yet though Even though there's like a ton of Super Bowl players in the stores right now Oh, by the way, you guys are seeing this video the day before the Super Bowl So I'm gonna give you my Super Bowl prediction right now. This is coming out on Saturday My prediction is the Eagles beat the cheese by three I'm gonna say 31 to 28 and I have officially made my prize pick for the Super Bowl Mahomes more than half a passing yard duh and Jalen Hertz more than 46 and a half rushing yards for anyone out of the loop I recently started working with prize picks. They are amazing It's the easiest way to play daily fantasy sports and they have this crazy promotion for the big game where Mahomes only needs To throw for half a passing yard, so that's a free square take that one and then like I said It's Jalen Hertz season, so I'm doing more than 46 and a half rushing yards.  I think he's gonna be running like a madman I can't wait to see it. So on the top of the description is a link to prize picks code MMG is an a hundred percent deposit match Up to a hundred dollars for first-time depositors, so let me know what you guys think I can't wait for the big game a huge shout out to prize picks for sponsoring and enjoy the rest of the video Oh my god. He already came out Proceeds God we're gonna have to wait on Justin Jefferson. Alright, but for now we get the best center in the game So he has a 98 run block 98 run block power 97 run block finesse. This is an endgame center I will never be replacing him no matter what unless of course he gets a golden ticket, which is not gonna happen Or maybe he gets Super Bowl MVP. You never know don't count it out He gets a zero AP post up in the fifth slot or a zero AP nasty street He gets secure protector for one. I believe secure protector stops inside stuff. I'm actually gonna go with post up I'm gonna go with the free post up I just did a little research it seems like a lot of people are running post up over nasty streak on their centers So I'll take their word for it Plus my left guard and right guard are silvers right now So they're gonna need all the help they can get and if Kelsey can Dominantly win the blocks with them that will be awesome takes a lot of pressure off of them So the Jason Kelsey prestige Bays off it really only paid off because they made it to the Super Bowl I don't think he would have gotten another card if we're it not for that. I'm a happy camper right now He's boosted to a ninety eight. He's officially the highest overall player on my team as for the team We're a 78 overall. We know it's gonna be a really really difficult game. It was tough last game We got absolutely massacred. I think we definitely have to get Elijah Hicks out of there I got to get a strong free safety in cuz he was a big liability last game And then we go quarterback and half back if I get to choose I guess let's see what this wheel spin gives us and we'll go from there And all right gentlemen the first wheel spin from the pre Super Bowl episode You guys have so much good content. You get this wheel of mud you get the Super Bowl tomorrow in real life This spin sucks so much late in the season like it's actually useless, but it is so Good right now. I can get three packs from the store that cost coins. There is a Super Bowl fantasy pack It looks like a guarantees elite players. I think we go three of these That's definitely the route we take and I swear to God if I pull 97 Jason Kelsey I'm gonna put my fist through my wall you guys remember when I pulled 94 all Madden. Hey, you know what? I never had a punter last year. So there's a chance. I oh just kidding. I get two picks this round There's no way I'm taking him Bobby Wagner 85 our third player is an aka that actually could be nasty Hey, it's the low overall milk man. We didn't actually lose the milk man. We just downgraded him I think Wagner JJ was pretty obvious here. I love the punter, but I can't actually use him Super Bowl players Now we get Reggie Raglan another middle linebacker. I could kind of lock out my linebackers right now or Milton Williams at Detackle I'm actually gonna go Milton Williams. I just got Bobby Wagner. I don't think I need Reggie Raglan I'll take it the tackle that around three's got the highest overall players another.  Detackle and Justin Watson. You know what? I'll take it. All right pack number two I wouldn't hate some online my cues. I'm really hoping that's not one of my best options So it sucks Mercedes Lewis. I don't know if I'd go that either Zeke yikes. This first round is a bummer I guess I'll go Mike Hughes and Zeke our Super Bowl peg Derek Nadi again. Our second round also has a left guard Definitely take that. All right. We got a left guard strong. Oh, I might take him put my free safety unless this is a really good Nope tray flowers. It is all right third and final Super Bowl pack Steve at water 87 to start us out I don't mind if I do Kyler Murray. I got a QB I almost don't want at water because I already have strong safety and a free safety But I can get John run you put in the right guard.  I might take Tevin Coleman It just depends what this is, but I might I'm taking them damn We didn't really pull anything that great, but we filled a lot of important positions. All right So here's what the team looks like right now I got tray flowers at free safety wagger an outside linebacker Mike Hughes actually sucks He's horrible, but we're gonna do our best to get somebody else in there Milton Williams JJ Watt and then an offense my offensive line do my offensive lines actually pretty good now. That's huge However, I didn't put in Kyler or Tevin Coleman yet. Yes, I put in Tevin Coleman, but I kind of anticipate these next two wheel spins I get somebody else. Let's just see. Okay with this wheel spin. I would love to get a quarterback That's not Kyler Murray, but I'm stuck with Kyler. I know we can get the job done Actually had him as my quarterback in a different video. Wow. I've been getting this one a lot Five Madden 20 packs match the player. So for example, if in Madden 20, I pulled Lamar Jackson I could get the best version of Lamar Jackson in Madden 23. All right, five game changer packs Let's see what we got here gentlemen. I think a cracked quarterback is best case scenario. Oh Brian burns doesn't he have oh wait. No, no, no, he does it. Brian burns has a mid He has a 91 overall Michael Strahan ain't that bad court Clement It's fun. It's a Super Bowl past Eagles player Desmond King and Bailey would be good and Derek Brooks would be really good Derek Brooks has an insanely good card. It's just not the position. I want Desmond King has a 95 overall corner Champ has a 96 which I've used before and Derek Brooks has a 96. Okay. These are three excellent options right here Right now. I'm leaning towards Desmond King. I want Desmond King the most out of any of those Matt Ryan has an insane QB called Maddie ice. He's got 87 speed. He's a 96 overall. Oh, he's good, dude I might go Matt Ryan. I'm definitely leaning towards that I don't know what I could get that would supersede that if I pulled Derek Henry Maybe that's the only thing that would supersede Matt Ryan Alex Oka for Carl Lawson Kevin Green Derek Brooks again. Why I'll scare. It's got a good card.  These are gonna be amazing. The fact that he's 87 speed makes me really like this I was worried he was gonna have like 60 speed. He does get his signature ability. Although I'll be honest I don't know which one it is. It's gambit starts on faster passes that can't be picked off by AI defenders That's awesome. Does that technically operate as Gunslinger? Sorry Glock Purdy, but Maddie ice is taking over Oh, he gets nasty abilities in the final slot hot route master Gunslinger identifier I'm gonna run hot route master fearless and then probably set feet lead or something like that if he gets it set feet lead for Three AP should get set feet lead fearless hot row master. I might have to rethink this in the future It's very expensive seven AP just for Matt Ryan. I think in the long run I probably don't need hot route master since Hawkinson can get tight end apprentice But for now I'm cool with this That leaves the final spin of today's episode. I'm hoping it can be a defensive player probably a really good corner Look at the corner would be the best case there for me. It's playoffs 90 to 95 to be totally honest with you guys I don't know why she killed Griffin keeps getting cards, but he got a 93 overall corner This is a 90 to 95 playoffs card and he's pretty damn good. He's really just like a very solid corner all around He's not incredibly tall. He's not incredibly fast, but he's just good pretty physical too So I'm excited to have him.  We get my cues out of there We got tray flowers at strong safety. My team can very much win games right now I sure what abilities he gets he gets something for discounted though I'm gonna give him deep out zone KL and I'll probably switch him in sauce Then sauce can be my slot corner. All right Shaquille griff is the final edition today So Maddie ice Shaquille Griffin and a ton of roleplayers This is a huge team-building episode right now, but we got to come out with a dub to keep them Alright, so here's how it looks defense. We got Fred Warner, Troy Palamalu, Micah Parsons, Shaq Griffin, J.J.Y. Milton Williams, sauce carter, Megatron and tray flowers up top then offensively We got a brand new offensive line other than Rashid Walker who is still putting in some reps over there left tackle We got Justin Watson at wide receiver, Tevin Coleman at halfback. It's funny. I say Tevin Coleman I never looked at his stats. How good is Tevin Coleman? 91 speed 89 excel 91 change the direction He's just mid, but you know what? I could give him an ability I'm gonna give him jukebox because nobody can stop me and lighting up Tevin Coleman makes us 12-12.  That's actually fire. Let's go Let's hop into this game. Let's get a huge W boys and I gotta spend the challenge.  He's got the jail it hurts. The rest of his team isn't too scary though Of course the challenge will before I return this kick. I gotta see what our challenge wheels gonna be Looks like it. Oh not zero turnovers. Actually. I could do that. Oh This is a tough one best player cannot lead the team in yards So I'd say the best player in our offense. It's tough because like how do you determine the best player? I'm just gonna go by overall TJ Hawkinson is the highest overall player on my offense The next highest is Justin Jefferson after Justin Jefferson is Tevin Coleman So TJ Hawkinson cannot lead this team in receiving yards. Let's just see how this first play opens up I see Coleman great row got rocked. We may actually have the blockers for it Hey Devin Coleman third and one. I'm gonna go Coleman out the backfield. I'm just gonna take this first down dude I'm getting a hit now. It looks like Matt Ryan's gambit ability does turn off after four plays And it probably charges back up. I don't get it for the entire game Look at Jason Kelsey and that is literally Kaonte Ingram who just got seven yards rushing right there second and three. I see Justin Jefferson I want to make sure no way That was Justin Jefferson's first touch of the football dude. This happened in another game Maybe Justin Jefferson just kind of fumble prone. That was the first time he touched the football the whole game You can't even say he was tired.  All right. We got to fight through it tough fumble to start this game Oh, I almost had that too. Ah Good throw. I am kind of scared of a run. There it is He nice tackle by Shaq Griffin. I don't think he runs it again. He doesn't he's gonna pass I think I've got everything. No way Let's go Great work defense. He goes for it. He turned me over first. He's gonna go for it. Oh, no, I'm on Otito Agbania He goes with the whip route and he is gonna get it I will say even if I wasn't on Otito Agbania I wasn't gonna stop that because I wasn't gonna go over that whip route I think he gets that no matter what now He runs it kind of figured and that's where Fred Warner is second in goal. I'm scared of the run man He's not gonna run it He is really just camping in that pocket. Let's go Dude, is he getting scared or what? I swear he had like three different passes and he's gonna settle for the field goal Dude, he converts on a previous fourth down and now he's gonna now he's gonna take it I'm so happy about that. I'm not gonna lie though. That's so unfortunate about Justin Jefferson He had no reason to fumble But he fumbled Tevin Coleman get a little spin nice work. I'm really liking Tevin Coleman, dude Let's hit Coleman out the backfield here beautiful My best player is definitely not leading in yards right now. So that's good, but I do want to hit my best player I want to hit Hawkinson here I'm gonna hit him. He looked right at that. I don't know if Hawkinson was open. I'm gonna look at Mike Irvin What a window? If that's 96 Mike Irvin, that's a touchdown, but that's a beautiful throw from Maddie I sound third and ten. That's a huge conversion. I still believe in the run. Let's go.  Oh, we had that. There's Coleman beauty Dude, there's a detac about to come light me up. Do I just take this we play for the win gentlemen We always play to win gentlemen. There he is beauty Beauty and he gets ball at half. So I have to score with no time I can't give him the ball back can't a ingram is in because our boy is getting hit right now I'm just gonna go down. That is fine by me. I'm gonna go five wide. Oh Justin Jefferson. Hey He's got a fumble in that drop right there. Oh, I need these points because he gets ball at half I need these points. There's nothing wrong with my abilities that fumble. Oh that fumble. All right Hey, that's okay The fumble sucked We've got a whole second half to go actually get ourselves in the end zone prove that we deserve to win this ball game And win this ball game. All right, three to three Make a mistake throw that post throw it throw the deep post. Yes Throw it. I literally said throw it and he throws it for a touchdown That was a hell of a ball I thought for sure that Paula Molly was gonna be able to catch up to that and all of a sudden I'm down by seven We got Phillips The silver I think it's is that Kyle Phillips or something like that. Why is Justin Watson not in why is that bozo in?  Oh Kelsey to the second level I'm not gonna lie though Kelsey with nasty streak would have flattened his user there There's there's no way I run right behind Kelsey again and we're money. Yep Hey, it's having Coleman out to the 49 Watson's up there. He's in the window. Oh What a laser clamped like crazy, but Hawkinson's got one this time. He misses It's to the one oh to the one I'm gonna run this let's go quick base get in there Coleman here put seven up Oh, wait, wait, it's not seven yet. It's not seven yet. It's not seven yet. It is now seven. Let's go. Does he just do the same thing?  What what was that? I've never seen that before. What was that shit? I'm on the wrong, dude.  You got to be thinking about making a mistake You're not gonna you're not gonna not turn the ball over, right? Hell of a dude this Jalen hurts is a God.  What do you know fourth quarter tied up? We'll must script writers are back in their bag nice throw and it's a touchdown two minutes 40 seconds down by seven My offense is not spectacular, but we've made it work This is gonna be a really tough touchdown, but we got to go get it Coleman He's on it, but he just wasn't in front of it. That's the two-minute warning and I've got a crucial third and five right now I'm tempted to run the ball. We follow Jason Kelsey. I think I can get this on third and five Let's believe in Coleman third and five follow Kelsey follow Kelsey Let's go. I fell but that's a first Irvin Irvin with a very nice whip route did it didn't Michael Irvin like just recently Did he recently get fired for like an assault allegations or something shitty? I thought this is gonna be my best power-up legend and all of a sudden. He's getting in trouble. He's there Silver Maddie ice is legit, bro 17 for 21 90 There he is Hawkinson highball comes down with us. Let's go There can't be any time on this clock when I score. I can't give him time to get in field ball range All right. All right, Justin Watson. Ah Script writers why script writers? Why do you do this to me? Why do you raise my heart rate like this role? I'm not built for this somebody dude Do the script writers need to raise or do they need to be fired? I can't figure it out quick base goddess to touchdown last time. I still have a time out to use Let's go Coleman.   What is that? He had him. Oh my god. I thought that was a sure fight. Look at this Look at the separation and then he just glitches up and steals the ball.  Oh 18 to say was game over great game. I can't wait to watch that highlight dude I as soon as I snapped the ball. I was like, oh my god. We just won the game the separation was ridiculous It's script writers. I actually hate you whoever wrote the script for this game, bro You're fired so I'm in five wide I motion Phillips over to distract his user out the gates That's like 80 yards of separation. I throw it as soon as I can snap throw look at this. What happened? It's like Hawkinson slow down. It's just an animation.  Watch this ball glitch, bro Watch this ball glitch up and out. Look at the trajectory The whole trajectory of the ball changes. Oh That hurts so bad Tevin Coleman had 85 scrimmage yards DJ Hawkinson at 62 so I did complete my challenge with the question would be what do I Salvage I could salvage the wheel spin where I got three store packs That would mean I get to keep my left guard my right guard my right tackle. I'd keep Justin Watson I'd keep Trey flowers. I'd keep Wagner. I'd keep Milton Williams. I'd keep JJ Watt. That's a whole lot of players I'm definitely not keeping chat griffin. He is really good But in comparison, no I keep Matt Ryan Matt Ryan was crazy good. None of that was on Matt Ryan We we just got so unlucky that game the fumble and that last play if either of those go our way We win the game. I gotta breathe this one in breathe this one out and make my decision in the next episode So the start of next episode you'll see my team You'll know we now move to oh and to so if I want a chance at making a playoffs I must win the next five games in a row. All right boys. I love you Thanks for watching as always let's redeem ourselves next game Somebody find the script writers and talk to him for me bro cuz I'm pissed. I love you guys. Thanks for watching. I'll see you soon Peace


Hi everyone, Joe for Jasper's casebreaks.com last break of the night 2019-2020 Panini contenders optic basketball picker team 107 big thanks to this group right here for getting in on it Thanks to Aaron double-ass about mojo finishing off the break appreciate it. Thanks everybody for getting in the end of the break will Give away some money as well We're gonna select the box. We'll go we'll go by row We'll go one two three four if I roll a five or six. I'll just roll again Four bottom two boxes right there The next two boxes are already up.  That's rookie RJ Barrett For the Knicks that's gonna go to That's gonna go to Derek and the New York Knicks Brandon Ingram Triple J Jaren Jackson Jr Michael Porter Jr. And nice Jalen Brunson Soft second year Jalen Brunson. What a season he had this year 55 out of 125. Yeah, he's gonna get pay Great year for him. I've got a randomizer Kevin Garnett Charles Barkley Timberwolves Sixers Joe Brunson who Now he had a good season Joe. He's got to respect that Maybe maybe not a good maybe not a good Sun series, right? I'm gonna laugh when the Sun zone Yeah, cuz he's been building up since the preseason almost for an entire calendar year He's gonna get roasted big time Cuz he's he wrote a lot of checks He wrote a lot of checks There's LeBron James superstar die cut Uniformity Kemba Walker Porzingis Ben Simmons blue Ben Simmons and Nicholas Claxton. No, no RJ. No Zion. No, John Moran Nice gold though Anthony with the Nets Six out of ten right there and the Ben Simmons was number two that's sixers edition going to Aaron Yeah, I mean we have not seen the big names we saw a hachimura I think in the first inner case a Kobe white as well That's about it All right, let's do a couple randomizers will do one for this and one for the break credit same dice roll All right, so let's go to random.org The first thing we'll set up is the Timberwolves and Sixers right there and Let's gather everybody's names if you bought at least you follow the instructions Like Aaron did if you bought an even number of teams half of those become entries Anthony got ten teams. That's five entries Derek got two teams. That's an entry Han got two teams. That's an entry Mark got four teams. That's two entries Mike got two teams. That's an entry Patrick Davis got two teams. That's an entry and Roy got two teams That's I think every single person bought an even number of teams nice good work So there's Aaron Anthony Derek Han mark Mike Patrick and Roy Nice, so let's gather all these names up here put them into the second blank list one dice roll for both lists It's gonna be come on ram.org 11 times not this late at night two three I know right four five So I'm trying to get out of here and it's like 11 times eight nine Ten and 11 than final time there you go Minnesota gets that that two player card historic picks fifth overall Yeah, the late night 11 always kills me here and the top four after 11 will get a hundred dollars break credit each one two three four five six seven eight nine ten and Finally 11 than final time Anthony Anthony Derek Anthony Congrats you hundred dollars a break credit each going your way Anthony I'm gonna send you one code for 300 bucks Derek. You'll get a code for a hundred bucks as well Thanks everybody for watching for breaking with us. What a great week of breaks join Jason tomorrow and And he'll continue on with all the stuff that we have on jaskies case breaks calm Thanks everybody jaskies case


Felly, ddweud o'r bwysig o'r cyffredinol. Now, it's time to move on to the next item for business, which is consideration of business motion 11143 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau setting out a business programme. I call on George Adam to move the motion. Thank you, Presiding Officer, I'm moved. Thank you. I call on Russell Findlay to speak to and move amendment 11143.2 up to five minutes, please. Thank you, Presiding Officer. The Scottish Government has spent more than £80,000 in papers about breaking up the United Kingdom. They've just wasted more taxpayers' money to publish their latest instalment of propaganda, which they now want to debate in Parliament. Even Humza Yousaf admits that those sit on a website and nobody reads them. Policing is one of the many public services for which the Scottish Government has full responsibility. The outlook is dire for our hardworking police officers who protect the public. In recent months, we've heard a series of shocking announcements about Police Scotland. One senior officer described SNP cuts as slash and burn. The Justice Committee has been told that more than 2,000 police officers could be taken off our streets. The police say that they will no longer be able to investigate every crime in the north-east of Scotland. The Police Federation put it in the starkest possible terms. People may die. We're seeing a rise in recorded crime, and that is just what is being reported. The former chief constable said that policing is not one of the SNP Government's priorities. Yet, in the duration of this parliamentary term, the SNP Government has not dedicated a single debate solely on Scotland's police force. Although we've already had multiple debates endlessly arguing about independence, my business motion amendment proposes ditching the SNP's planned debate on independence and replacing it with a much-needed, long-awaited discussion on the future of Scotland's police. I'm giving SNP members the opportunity to make it clear where their priorities lie. Is it with the police and giving them the resources they need to keep the public safe, or is it with their own political obsession with independence? I know that my party and I will be backing the police, and I urge all members to do the same. I move the business motion amendment in my name. I now call on Martin Whitfield to speak to and move amendment 11143.1 up to five minutes, please. I'm very grateful, Presiding Officer, and for the formalities I move the motion in my name. The amendment seeks to alternate a debate from one that the Scottish Government wish to have with one that the Scottish people wish to have. In the previous amendment that has been put, which, unfortunately, because of preemption, we will be unable to support, shows that across this chamber there are priorities that exist. My amendment would allow the Scottish Government to talk about the homeless crisis that we have here in Scotland. That which is not unique to Scotland, but one in which our constituents suffer differently, be it they live in a city and we have Edinburgh that is just called a housing crisis, and those that live in the country, and I think in particular of the constituents across the south of Scotland, but also that homeless crisis that applies to our students. I'm more than happy to give way. As I understand it, the members on both sides are keen to ditch the debate on immigration and the fact that immigration powers should be in the hands of this Parliament. This week alone, we learned that 7,500 children are stuck in the asylum system run by the UK Government. Is that not something that we should be debating? I'm very grateful for that intervention and it will be interesting. It will be interesting to see how the motion is indeed framed. If indeed it talks about those individuals that the intervention made mention of, because there is no indication there in the title that's been offered that that's what it's going to talk about, whereas both in the amendment that's been proposed from the Conservative Party and the amendment that I move, we are speaking specifically about challenges that we face here in Scotland that our constituents face, particularly with regard to homelessness. Soon after the recent report from the Trussell Trust on a horrendous increase in the number of emergency parcels that have had to be handed out and provided for, we are living at a time where there are crises in our community. Those crises are many and varied, as we've heard across this Chamber, but one in particular and one I urge consideration for is in the state of the homelessness, a situation that during Covid we showed that we could deal with and now we have abandoned those people. I move the motion in my name, Presiding Officer. I call on George Adam to respond on behalf of the parliamentary bureau up to five minutes, Minister. Thank you, Presiding Officer, and it's been a while since we've had one of these discussions at decision time, Presiding Officer. As always, I will try and work constructively with other business bureau managers and I will continue to do so in the future. Martin Whitfield's amended proposal for discussion is valid and of merit. We no doubt will discuss this at future bureau meetings, but it is my belief, Presiding Officer, that Scotland's Parliament must discuss Scotland's future. Mr Whitfield and I made the disagree on what that future holds for us, but it is my belief that Scottish independence provides us with the tools necessary to deal with the issues and the challenges, such as the ones that Mr Whitfield wishes to discuss, and that shows the need for the building a new Scotland series of papers, Presiding Officer. With regard to parliamentary process, there is nothing in the standing orders that prevents us from discussing matters beyond the powers of this Parliament, and it is not unusual for the Scottish Parliament to debate and vote in motions in areas that are reserved so that proposed building a new Scotland debate is not new or novel in that sense. We've had numerous debates in the Parliament on reserved matters that have allowed the Parliament to take a position or send a message to those who are responsible for such decisions. In fact, nuclear weapons was the subject of a member's debate just last week, Presiding Officer. On 4 October, the Government brought forward a debate on the UK Government's two child benefit cap. Members of the Scottish Labour Party, the Scottish Conservative Party, took part in that debate without raising any issues with the reserved nature of the topic, and some members of the Labour Party even criticised us for being too narrow when focusing on the debate on the two child benefit cap instead of the wider issues with the UK Government's universal credit system. On migration itself, this is an important discussion for us to have in this Parliament. In April this year, the Scottish Government led a debate on the UK Government's proposed illegal migration bill, and the Labour member supported the Government's motion, albeit with an amendment, and no such opposition to the relevance of that debate as well. Scotland's population is projected to begin to fall within the next decade and the opportunity to discuss this role and that migration can play in addressing Scotland's distinct demographic challenges should be welcomed by all elected members. With regard to Mr Finlay, it was another exciting and riveting presentation from Mr Finlay, but at the end of the day, as of 30 September 2023, there were 379 more police officers than in 2007. With Police Scotland recruiting almost 600 officers this year alone and around 1,480 new recruits since the beginning of 2022. Once again, there is a difference between the reality and what Mr Finlay talks about. Scotland has more police officers per capita than England and Wales and higher peer ranges for officers of all ranks and high levels of investment over the last decade, with 30 officers per 10,000 population compared to 25 in England and Wales. The recently agreed pay deal is for 12 per cent increase over two years for the police workforce and for police officers remain the best paid in the UK. We will take no lectures, we will listen to no scenario from the Conservatives that we are not dealing with the police and make sure that Scotland crime is at an all-time low since the 70s and Mr Finlay might as well sit down because there is no point in boring us anymore. With that, I would like to say that I have made my arguments forward and I believe that Scotland must discuss Scotland's future. I remind members that, if the amendment in the name of Russell Finlay is agreed to, the amendment in the name of Martin Whitfield will fall. The first question is that amendment 11143.2 in the name of Russell Finlay, which seeks to amend motion 11143 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau setting out a business programme, be agreed. Are we all agreed? No. The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to vote and there will be a short suspension to allow members to access digital voting.


In an inspiring gesture of community engagement, Shanice Butcher, the crowned 2023 Carnival Queen, has been sharing her life story of overcoming hurdles and beating the odds. Butcher, an avid advocate of the youth and other social causes, has consistently used her voice to call for resistance to the stigmatization and stereotyping of individuals. Emphasizing the need for second chances and using herself as a prime example, the Carnival Queen sought to bring positivity and encouragement to the young women who frequented the new beginning's transit home. People go from many experiences and those experiences may not be the best. And coming from somebody who can resonate with the girls at the transit home, who basically go through a lot in their life, I believe that second chances are something that is necessary and considering the fact that I was able to get a second chance to tell my story and take back control of my life. I just wanted to come today and just allow them to see that their experiences in life should not define them and should not also limit them. Via a moving and motivational talk hosted on November 18, 2023, Queen Butcher encouraged the girls never to give up, but to dig deep instead, believing themselves and their potential and consistently rise above adversity. The impromptu time of the activity was attributed to the unexpected arrival on island of an esteemed colleague and distinguished inclusion, expert in self-discovery, Dr. Jackie Evans Phillips. It's always been a mission of mine to come back home and create a difference. I have an organization called the Dream Big College and we are on a mission to empower girls to be change makers by helping them decrease anxiety and depression. And so working today with those girls here was really, really, really a pleasure, really helping them discover the girl power gems. Letting them know that inside of them that they are gems and no matter what their circumstances are, no matter what they've been through, that there is greatness inside of them. Apart from the motivational talk, Queen Shannis Butcher has proposed a Christmas decorating event aimed at bringing festive cheer to the occupants of the new beginning's transit home. She believes that the proposed initiative will bring smiles to the faces of young residents and contribute to fostering a sense of togetherness and given during the holiday season. From the Ministry of Equity, Social Justice and Empowerment, Gervoy Marius.


Birth defects are a major health concern worldwide, with approximately half of all cases being unexplained. Early diagnosis and treatment of these conditions can help reduce morbidity and mortality rates. In this paper, we reviewed current practices in diagnosing and treating birth defects, including prenatal screening, and discussed the need for further research into the causes of these conditions. This article was authored by O.M. Gorbitik, I.A. Mekdonsky, and H.V. Kirolo.


Hello and welcome to NewsClick. I am Paranjoy Gohar Thakurtha and with me here in the studio I have Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India, Dinesh Divedi. Thank you Dineshi for coming here. We are going to discuss what are the options before the Supreme Court of India after its judgment of the 14th of December and the government's application, the union government's application to change, modify, alter that judgment. And what are the implications for the entire controversy surrounding the purchase of Rafale fighter aircraft? Dineshi, these three judges, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gokoyi, Justice SK Call, Justice K.M. Joseph, gave a judgment. And in a small part of the judgment, we read and hear about it. And in this, what they said, all of them were absolutely shocked. In their conclusion, they wrote that we find no reason for any intervention by this court on the sensitive issue of purchase of 36 defence aircraft by the Indian government. And now, after that, the government has issued an application to amend it. On the pricing issue, the Supreme Court has stated, the pricing details have been shared by the controller and auditor general of India. And the report of the CAG has been examined by the public accounts committee and only a redacted portion of this report was placed before parliament and is in the public domain. And the Chief of the Air Staff is stated to have communicated his reservation regarding the disclosure of the pricing details, including the details pertaining to the weaponry, etc. Because if all of this information is spread, then this is bad for the national security. Then Rahul Gandhi made a media conference. And he said that the CAG's report has not come yet. And this CAG's report, when the public accounts committee, which is the Chief of the Air Staff, has not come yet, then the government gave an application. He said, there is something wrong in this. This is not true. And he wrote that where the government has already shared, it should be in the past tense, it will be shared. Instead of this, it should have been. So everyone will understand how is this possible? And after this, everyone feels that why the Supreme Court has given such a judgment. And it seems that there is a very serious issue behind this, that a statement was given by the government in a sealed cover. And the government himself said, these statements appear to have been based on a note submitted by the Union of India along with the pricing details into sealed covers. And these sealed covers were submitted to this Honourable Court in compliance with the order dated 31st October 2018, which had directed etc. This is a very serious issue and you are a lawyer, please explain to people in a simple language what the meaning of this judgment and the application of the government is and how to proceed from here. As you said, this statement is in the judgment. If you look at it, then the nature of that statement is very categorical and clear. There is no reflection of any kind of doubt on it. Therefore, it is obvious that where did this question come from? Now, if we look at it in this context of the petition, then there is no pleading in the petition regarding this. There is no pleading from the government regarding this. In the name of pleading, there is only a note in the confidential sealed cover. And this note? No one has seen it. Is there a sign of someone or not? No, we are told that it is unsigned. That is what we have read in lots of places. So it is not verified, it is not signed. There is only a statement in the name of pleading in which the judges have relied. Now, if a judge gives a clear categorical statement like this in his judgment, then it is obvious that it is based on something. And there is only a note because there is no pleading. So this is a very reasonable assumption that the judges have relied on the same note and come to this part of the judgment. What is the application of the government? I will also come to that. And there is no judge? You are right that the modification of the government is a statement. This thing is impliedly admitted. Now the question is that if this statement has come from that note, then obviously the government has mislead it. If it has come from that note. Because it is a serious charge. But we don't know that. No, I am just inferring. So one reasonable inference is that it has come from that note. And if it has come from that note, then it means that the government has mislead it. Now what will be the second inference? Which is really dreadful. If the government has not mislead it, there is no pleading. There is no verified on oath. There are no arguments related to that. So this means that if the government has mislead it, then the judges themselves have created it. Which is a dreadful thing. No, there are three judges. This is why I am saying this. So the second aspect is that I think I would be the last one to believe that. What is my possibility? This is the first part of the mislead. Now when the press conference took place, I think that the government had a panic reaction. Because maybe they felt that there would be a privileged issue. Then there would be another exposure. And if the privileged issue arose, then the statement of fact was admitted. Then there could be a contempt draw. So the question is that what did they do now? They tried to take out the third course. Which we say that the government tried to be too clever by half. You have moved a modification application, but you are noting that there is only inference from this statement. Now if you... This is the bleeding that is coming now in their modification. That the judges misread it, misinterpret it. I don't understand this. And can you speak English? I don't understand this. I don't speak English because I am also very weak in grammar. That's why I don't speak English. Because we learn to speak English, to read, without learning English. So that's why practice is over. What is the future? What is the past? And what is the present? The problem is that the modification admits that inference is based on the note. So that's the problem. Now if we are talking about misreading, as I was saying, it is impossible to imagine that three learned judges, three intelligent, smart judges, of the highest court, of India, of the highest court, three educated judges. How did a simple sentence misread it? I don't understand this. That is impossible to imagine. If there was a single judge bench, you would have doubted that a judge misreaded it. Two misreaded it, and the third misreaded it. This is impossible for me to imagine. It is impossible. And these are facts. Once CAG sent a report, and this report was sent in Sanskrit. But everyone knows it. After that, the Public Accounts Committee, everyone knows this. So I am actually very astonished and very surprised. Therefore, I am pointing this out to you. If you look at it, this statement of the government, in this modification application, clearly implies directly, indirectly, an aspersion is cast on the Supreme Court, that three judges are not very intelligent, who are not able to understand a simple grammar, who are not able to understand a simple sentence. I mean, according to me... Do you want to say that the Indian government presented that note? It is absurd. It really queers the entire scene. And are you lying? So if we are not able to believe that three judges can misinterpret it, misread it, a simple sentence, statement in the note. So, for me, to impute a lack of intelligence to the Supreme Court or to put a concoction on the Supreme Court is unimaginable. Sir, you are a senior advocate. Now look, what is likely to happen for you? The petitioners, in this, Mr. Shoriji, Mr. Yashwant Sinha, Mr. Rishan Bhushan, one review petition, and all the points you are saying, all those review petitions are written. The question is, that today the Supreme Court of India has the highest priority. What can be... What happened? What are the options before the Supreme Court? I think the options are very limited. And now, the Supreme Court will have to understand the honorable judges that whether they will accept the charge of misreading or not accepting then they will have to say that you mislead. There is no other option. That means, there are only two options in front of the Supreme Court. Both are bad. The first option is that you mislead us. The second option is to accept a far-fetched argument. And say that you misread it. But then that will create a lot of embarrassment. Then that will lead to lots of embarrassment and lots of face-saving problems. Mr. Dinesh, do you think this matter is going to be resolved soon or will it take time? It will take some time because as far as I understand if the court adopts the rational procedure then at least that part of the statement that has been submitted in the confidential report which is saying that you have misconstrued that part will have to be shown to the other side. It will have to be shown to the petitioners. Otherwise what will happen? The note will not remain open. That portion which is seeking clarification will have to be disclosed. Because the other side will have to give an opportunity. Mr. Dinesh, even today the CAG report was redacted and then the BSE was given. This has never happened in the history of India. If CAG presents a report once then all of you should take their opinion from the defence ministry. And then when the report is final when the final report is done that is a public talk. It is presented to parliament. So how is this possible that CAG report can be redacted? But the issue when we go there we don't understand that as we have heard from the newspapers and media is that the normal of the redacted report but sometimes the redacted reports have been submitted regarding some sensitive issues. So now if the redacted report is final whether or not it is final No, it is not, sir. I don't know. Actually I am not conscious of that. I spoke to many people who were former CAG who were with the Indian Party who were the political party who were with the Indian Party who gave reports of the redacted report they didn't. If they say that there is no redacted and there is no instance then your point is right that it cannot be like this. So until today, we are not telling that. I am saying this. So since I do not have confirmed factors this way or that way then I will not positively be able I have a question for you about politics. Sure, sure. I am very interested in it. In Sanskrit, Raksha Mantri Nehramalaseeta Raman said that after this Bofors Gautala, Rajiv Gandhi, Junao Har Ganesh, 1989. This time, Mr. Narendra Modi and Mr. Rafel Muddaki won the 2019 Lok Sabha Juna. This is my last question for you. I think this is the best answer we can get from the government. The Bofors Gautala has been around for so many years. The government has been around for so many years. It may be the end of the day, but we don't know the outcome. But the issue is that these people say that the corruption issue is not going well based on Rafaal. They think this is very important. We are reading in the newspaper every day that Mr. Muddaki himself is saying that we are not guilty. Before that, did you say that you would not let us eat? I am saying that if this has not cut much ice amongst the people, why are you giving explanations in every corner of India? Why? You are afraid that it will have an impact on the cities. Maybe they will trickle down and you are trying to prevent it. But you are not winning or losing because of any issue. You are losing because of an overall perception. The question is where is the perception based on the government? This is a matter of view. The issue of farmers, the issue of jobs, the issue of corruption, all of these will have an impact on the whole. There will be no issue related to the entire country. But it has an impact because the Prime Minister himself is explaining to the world that it has an impact. Thank you, Mr. Minesh. We will tell you the time. There are a few months left. The issue of corruption will really be affected by this. Will a common voter or a common man be affected? But this story... If you allow me to say one thing, what you said has an impact on Mr. Kharkis' press conference that he has immediately applied for a modification. I understand this very well. I understand that he is a very big and educated lawyer. This was a very panic reaction. And he made a mistake in that panic reaction. He should not have filed a lawsuit. I have my own opinion. I never filed a lawsuit. It should not have happened. Because the Supreme Court is putting this in a very odd situation. So today, time will tell what will happen. But the options that are before the Supreme Court... Getting limited. Are limited. And both of them will show the working of the highest score of the land in not so good light. In fact, the modification application does reflect that. Therefore, the government has to redact. Thank you once again, Dinesh Ji, for coming to this interview. Thank you so much. Thank you very much. He explained in simple language what are the options for the Supreme Court of India as far as the referral matter is concerned. And both those options will not throw this country, this country's government and this country's apex court in good light. Thank you very much for being with us on this program. And keep watching Newscake.


Welcome to the Rich TV Live podcast. I'm your host Richard D'Souza on this December 28th, 2023. Only a couple of trading days left in the year and we're here. All right. So Bitcoin is at 42,482, kind of down today, 2%. So definitely slowing down the momentum that it had yesterday and all the Bitcoin related stocks went up. A lot of cryptos were up. And that's slowing down today. Now let's talk about the hottest stocks of the day. N, V, F, Y. 149% gainer today. We had that God candle, then another candle, then another candle. These are the hourly charts. So you can see that it's done quite well. Put it on your radar and put on your watch list. If I look at the one year chart, you can see that this is actually, it hit an all time high today or a 52 week high today. So very, very bullish price action for N, V, F, Y. Now up 151%, not really my style to go and buy it now. It's already made its move, but definitely want to watch. Put on your radar, put on your watch list, watch their news. And if they continue to do well, in my opinion, might be a nice play. Now 2023 has been the year of the large caps, the Magnificent 7, Bitcoin, large caps have done quite well in 2023. But small caps have really struggled. These penny stocks, anything under $5 have really struggled in 2023. I think there will be a rebound for small caps in 2024. So stay tuned for that. SIDU up 115%. So another trade that's doing really, really well today. SIDU up 116%. You can see that big candle. And this is the one year chart. And you can see it's clearly come down for much higher levels. So $100 stock at one point. And we're now sitting at $9.  And now we're sitting at $9 after dropping from $100. So massive gap to fill. I have no idea if it will or not. But if it does, could be a 10x from here. CING. All right. So this is another one having a big day today up 123%. So a couple of last minute Christmas gifts for Santa here, for investors, a couple of nice trades. Big, big bullish green candles here. And CING had a nice day yesterday. It's having a nice day today. So we did mark it up yesterday and told you that we definitely want to keep our eye on this. And the momentum continues here on CING. Now at $8.78 up 120% on the day. SNES up 109% on the day. We look at the yearly chart looks very similar to most of the small caps this year come down from much higher levels. And this was a large cap and it's now a small cap come all the way from 50 bucks of 47 cents. Can you believe that? And now doing this trend reversal where it's back to 82 and up 111%. So put SNES on your radar and on your watch list. There are four trades today up 100% and they're one of them. ZJYL is a $210 stock currently up 70% on the day. So very, very bullish price action for this play here. But it's really expensive. So I'd be careful. Mbots is a 43% gainer today. Look at the one year chart and you can see that it's another one that's come down from higher levels this year and starting to do this what I always call a dead cap bounce off the bottom. And now starting to gain some steam here. So the charts been all over the place and the RSI kind of looks like it's near high zone. So I'd be careful here. But Mbots up 43% another one of the top trades on the day. AMD just hit a 52 week high. They continue higher AMD chip maker. Draft Kings has had a monster year. Definitely keep your eye on them for next year. Meta also a monster year for Meta. They continue higher. They hit a 52 week high today. So lots of 52 week highs across the board. Apple looking pretty strong with struggling to get past that $200 mark micro strategies despite the fact that Bitcoin's down today continues higher on news that they're buying more Bitcoin and they're going to raise another $5 billion to buy even more Bitcoin. So they are definitely loading up RBLX Roblox. I told you guys that they were going to fly and they are flying. They continue to go up the video the number one chip maker and AI stock in the world just under 500. And every time they get to that 500 mark they seem to sell off. So going to be interesting to see if we can break that and square starting to stay in the green and just continuing that trend up Uber been a great year for Uber absolutely killing it. And they just hit a 52 week high. Amazon trading around a 52 week high. Google trading around a 52 week high. So we're seeing lots of highs across the board here as we finish off as the second last day of trading for 2023. Here's Ethereum had a monster day yesterday was well over 2400 pulled back a little bit at 2372. Moderna hit a hundred bucks. So keep your eye on Moderna. Tesla the Tesla ETF that I'm watching very closely. They're slightly red as Tesla is also red today. All right. Coinbase watching them closely. They're slightly red today as Bitcoin's pulled back. So it's Coinbase. Cardano had a nice day yesterday but they're pulling back today. Bitcoin also a nice day yesterday having a pullback today. GBTC pulling back with Bitcoin one of the largest holders of Bitcoin in the world and in America. Maddox had a nice day yesterday. They're pulling back today. BITF BitFarms had a nice day yesterday. They're pulling back today. CLSK another Bitcoin miner had a nice day yesterday. They're pulling back today. So you can see the trends and riots pulling back today after a nice day yesterday and Mara pulling back today after a nice day yesterday. All right. Want to wish everyone a happy holidays. Merry Christmas. Hope you enjoyed your holidays. I don't want to wish everyone happy new year. I'm your host of the most. Your boy Rich from Rich TV. If you're not winning, you're probably not watching. You're bringing the winners, CEO interviews, breaking news, trending topics, and we bring it to you first. We'll be here every step of the way for all of 2024 and keep you updated on all the players as they happen. Right now, NVFY, the biggest mover of the day, up 147%. Have a great day. Happy New Year's. Your boy's out. Peace.


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here since I'm a Halloween ends in this video here again today Going over some some of my thoughts about the test screening reactions and going because I've had like two sent to me and Going over things that I think they could have done to make this movie different going off of the narrative We know we're going to get and how I think this could have benefited us with a different character Some we already know who's been here from the previous two movies I'll get into that in a second and also talking about Laura Strode's recent not Laura Strode Jamie Lee Curtis is recent words that she shared with people people magazine or people calm when talking about The final shot of how it ends and how this might have been just an outright blatant spoiler of What her fate will be in this movie? so to start off with when it relates to this character of Corey Cunningham Corey Cunningham. We know is supposed to be the Main focus going into Halloween ends. That's the assumption going off of the synopsis and The details that have already been coming out online And if you're someone who really doesn't want to have any major things leaked to you It'd be best of course they offer the Halloween subreddit probably start leaving any real major Halloween Facebook groups or start muting search terms on Twitter Because we know that the events of Halloween ends again are jumping four years into the future Lori Stotis was living with her granddaughter and trying to finish her memoir and Myers hasn't been seen since Lori and and Lori what it says here is Lori finally decides to liberate herself from rage and fear and embrace life However, when a young man this young man of course Corey stands accused of murdering a boy that he was babysitting It ignites a cascade of violence and terror that forces Lori to confront the evil she can't control now I've already seen people say why are they doing this whole random Corey thing? Corey is a random character. We're now just about to meet and also I think only makes people a little bit more divisive or a little bit more unattracted to this time jump because you could have just had the ending of Halloween kills Lead into the events of Halloween ends if it stuck the course of what it looked like We were going to get which was a three-part trilogy set in the same night Which would have been ideal for a lot of Halloween fans because it erases all of these questions about where Michael was and You know the idea of why does he always come back on Halloween and stuff like that? So with that in mind, you know knowing how you're doing a time jump Picking up with a character of name Corey Cunningham I feel like it kind of makes the endings of Halloween kills no matter which version you watch kind of Useless to someone who many years from now will watch these movies and then turn on Halloween ends And it just jumps four years into the future starts off with something very random and Then focuses on this kid Corey Cunningham what you could have done Because again, it is describing that he will get stand accused of murdering a boy that he was babysitting So it's most likely that he didn't really do anything directly intentionally to murder said boy Or murder a kid whoever he's babysitting so well it does say he's a boy What you could have done is not apply this to Corey Cunningham We already have a character who's been through a lot that we could have focused on and did a done a character study of Besides introducing this new character Halloween ends could have taken the same concept with Corey Cunningham and applied it to the character of Allison Nelson Allison has recently lost her mother. She lost her father. She lost her ex-boyfriend She went through so much. She found out that her grandmother isn't actually as crazy as she was thought to be Throughout most of her childhood and that her mother's resentment towards her grandmother probably wasn't rooted in all the stuff It probably should have been it probably was a little bit too exaggerated because she wasn't crazy She got to meet Michael Myers herself She saw what Michael Myers is capable of and she was a part of that mob that went after him in Halloween kills out of fear and out of Frustration also just wanting to again, maybe get some revenge for the demise of her Her father and now at this time her mother who has died it died at the hands of Michael Myers So there's so many things that she's dealing with That trauma and everything that she's dealt with could have been applied to her You could have had a movie where she's the one standing accused of killing a young boy She gets sent to an asylum or something else. She could be set free, you know Nothing's brought against her and the town of Haddonfield kind of just doesn't like her because they think that she actually did do something But then it's of course established throughout the movie that it was indeed an accident That clearly seems like what they're gonna do with Corey Cunningham. The problem is Nobody cares about Corey already and we haven't even met him yet. I'm not saying that Corey won't be a well-written character I just think that a concept like this could have been applied to the character of Allison Nelson And again just to borrow what Dave McCrae again is taught about taught about this already multiple times Dave McCrae's comments about his Halloween 5 concept What you could have done is done this same concept with Allison Nelson who four years later we see that she's still struggling a lot with what happened four years ago and Unfortunately, she could have ended up in a predicament when she was babysitting that unfortunately led to an accident where she On an unintentionally killed the person.  She's she's deemed innocent mostly because it was an accident and Bodies could start dropping around the town of Haddonfield four years later They think it's Allison because she's been blamed and maybe mocked and The town hates her because she what she did what she did to that little boy They don't want to repute a Michael Myers of the town hates her So when bodies start dropping around all these four years later, the fingers are getting pointed at Allison You could have some tension with Lori due to her connection with Allison And you know, you could build up this anticipation with your audience playing placing this seat of doubt Is it actually Allison or is it Michael Myers is back you the audience can actually be established to know that Michael is back But the characters around you don't know and it builds to this final revelation that Allison wasn't the one killing these people Like the town thought she was it was Michael Myers who had indeed returned That's something that would have been I think a lot more effective instead of applying this concept to Corey Cunningham And just to talk about Lori Strowed Jamie Lee Curtis's recent comments that she had She said something about the final shot of the movie Saying that the last shot was part of a night shoot and I was in a car It was a close-up of me in the car and when we got out of the car It was 4 30 in the morning and there was the picture of my face on the screen now Again just drawing a lot of assumptions and making assumptions going off of what she said that is an indication Of course that Laura Stroll makes out of this movie alive I would imagine Michael Myers is gonna die Laura Stroll probably is gonna get the upper hand over Michael Myers and the test screening Reactions that I've been hearing about have been mostly mixed the person who reached out to me They said that they enjoyed the movie overall But it was very different from what they got to experience compared to the other two they said and they understood that it was a Departure like John Carpenter stated But let me know what you guys think about all this down in the comments section below If you haven't already of course make sure you subscribe turn on post notification number is a video in the description I'll have links to my social media accounts on Facebook Twitter and Instagram You can message me there of course limiters any movies news or views let me to cover in the future with all that in mind guys I will see you in the next video


I had an Iraqi refugee who used to work for Mercy Corps in Iraq, but she's Kurdish. So she was twice displaced, one under Saddam, and a second time again during the clashes that were happening with the war that was happening after the Iraq war. She found herself in the U.S. and although she was legal, she couldn't get a job, but she had like a Fulbright scholarship now, one in a thousand get a Fulbright. You know what I mean? It's a prestigious thing to do. Like, I know if I apply right now, Holly will not get in probably. So we needed to help her. So we threw a dinner for her and she was the only refugee that within one dinner she was able to land a job at Columbia Cornell. So that was really lovely because the other other refugees like had found kitchen work or found retail work or found like handy work, but this was like a professional institution that was present at the dinner and she was able to get a job immediately. So she didn't have to live on her friend's couch and she got her own apartment and seeing her life transformed that way and how about her family also is something that I'm very proud of. It's those moments that I really care about. And to be, you know, very honest, like for Komida, like these refugee dinner series, like they don't make us any money, right? It's all about like the how much can we help out and part of the community.


So, let's start by just looking at the first sentence that I've already translated, and this was from the very first video. So in a hole in the ground, there lived a hobbit, and I translated it as Nehi Lotum Svekevna L'Rider Chobi Shupu Ki Chabju. So Nehi is the in preposition for lack of a better word, but it's the modal tag. Lotum Svekevna, so Tumsve, if we look at the dictionary here, Tumsve is the ground. Kevna is a hole, so this is a ground type hole, in other words a hole in the ground, and Nehi means in. So L'Rider Chobi is a hobbit. Shu separates the Sumti from the Celbri. Within the Celbri we have Pu, which is the past tense, Ki, which makes it sticky, and Chabju, which just means X1 dwells in X2. And I've chosen not to use the X2 position, because then that would mean that L'Rider Chobi would have to come before the dwelling itself, and I wanted to put the dwelling in before that to sort of match the way the English has that. So that's basically what I did.  So what I thought I would do is, I don't know. I don't know if this is even going to work, but I will try to make some really simple English sentences out of this. So for example, you know, I could imagine that really the first thing that you're saying is the hole was not nasty, right? I mean, that's pretty straightforward. And then you can go on and say the hole was not dirty. The hole was not wet. The hole was not filled with the ends of worms. So let's just go with that and see where it leads. So the hole, of course, we know is going to be like Kevna Leb, because you know what I'm talking about when I say hole. It's the previous mention of hole right over here. Now was not, so shoe, nah, and then we need some word for nasty, not being the negator. So if I look in the dictionary for nasty, what have we got? We've got nothing. We have absolutely nothing. So I would probably need to look for some synonyms for nasty. So let's just see. So what have we got? Highly unpleasant, physically nauseating. What else have we got? Well, it's not a person physically or mentally damaging. No. So really, we want something like, I guess, unpleasant. Is there an unpleasant? There is. Well, unpleasant isn't creepy. That's not really yet, but I guess this works, Tolpuha. An event seems unpleasant, and we don't really have an event. We have just basically a noun. So that's not really great. What about pleasant? Pleasantness? No. Just pleasant. An event seems pleasant. Well, how about melby? Melby, maybe. So rather than just go through some of these things, let's look at one of the words that I've looked up before. So repugnant. See that's really what we want. Repugnant. Maybe there's a different synonym dictionary that I can look at, like thesaurus, synonym for nasty. Yeah, so there's a whole bunch of these. Repugnant is in there, so repellent, I guess, is another one. But I mean, we've got a perfectly good word here for repugnant. So X1 is repugnant, so regne. So it's not repugnant, right? So not regne, and that's pretty much that. So, the whole was not nasty, and then we can say, you know, the whole was not dirty. So let's see dirty. Oh, great.  Let's see, there's... So this is composed of na and jinsa. So jinsa means clean. So like kevna, juna, and then, well, clean. So there's a word that there's a schmavo that you can use to indicate the direct polar opposite of something. And we want the direct polar opposite of jinsa, and that's tohe. So if I can say na tohe jinsa. So the polar opposite of jinsa, clean, would be dirty, and it's not dirty. So I guess that's good enough. Let's stick a sentence separator in there. And let's say the whole is not wet. The whole was not wet. So let's go see what wet is. Okay. Shilmo, works for me, kevna, juna, what was it again, shilmo, shilmo.  Maybe we should try to combine this. So first of all, one nice thing that I kind of, one nice feature that I kind of like about Lujban is the ability to refer to previous sumti based on their first letter. So if I wanted to refer to kevna, as long as there was no other sumti starting with ke, I can just replace this with the letterol ke. Ke is the letterol ke. It's actually the variable ke. And when you just use it as a sumti, it basically means the previous sumti that started with ke. So in other words, it's just it. But the it refers to a specific thing that started with ke. So we can just replace that here. That does kind of shorten things a little bit. Ke. So ke is the same as letoomsve kevna. So ke shuna rigni, e ke shuna tohe jinsa, e ke shuna shilmo. But again, that's still a lot of repetition. So what we really want is to combine this. And in video five, I talked about connectives. So what are we saying here? It was not a nasty dirty wet hole. Are we saying it was not nasty, or it was not dirty, or it was not wet, or possibly some combination of all of them? Or are we saying it was not nasty, and it was not dirty, and it was not wet? What we're certainly not saying is not it was nasty and dirty and wet, because it was actually none of those things. So I think maybe, let's just try this, e, oh wait, no, we can't use that, because this is actually the breedy. So we need the connector for breedy tails, which is gihe. So this is where you want to have and, gihe, and then na tohe jinsa, gihe, na shilmo. Okay, so I think what this is saying is that the hole was not nasty, and it was not dirty, and it was not wet. Na applies to, I think, let's go to the crash course in Lajban. And let's look up na, or actually, let's first go to the sort of dictionary that is in there, and look up na, just to see the usage here, because I do want to get it correct. And I'm not going to get it correct, because I am not an expert in Lajban. So let's see, ne, ne, nansha, nai, preposition of truth, it is not true that. Or it's the left negator in conjunctions. So it kind of looks like na here comes after e, so it is not true that. There's also tohe, which basically means anti. So if we go back to here, I'm not sure I can put na in there. Yeah, I think this is really what it is. So na pretty much negates the entire breedee. So here's the breedee. The breedee would be that the hole is repellent. Na would negate that, so the hole is not repellent. It could be something else, but it's certainly not repellent. And the hole is not unclean, and the hole is not wet. So it's not any of these, actually.  In other words, in other words, a cannot be true and b cannot be true, which is really the same thing as saying not a and not b. So anyway, so that's not bad. I guess let's continue, filled with the ends of worms, okay, so it was not. So the hole was not filled with the ends of worms. So that's kind of the, let me put an e in front of here to separate from the previous breedee. So let's, let's just write this like we're four years old. The hole was not, now we need a word for filled. So is there a word for fill, fill? Yeah? Okay, so x one fills with material x two. Oh, look at this. Here we go. Shulno x one is full or completely filled with x two. So it's not filled with x two. Okay. So what are the ends of worms? Well, it's going to be low. Worm ends, worm type ends. So that would be a tanru, right? So we worm, worm, okay, shulno, here we go. Worm type and now ends. So what's an end? An end finished termination of a thing or a process. Okay, that's possible. This is a verb meaning to stop. That's not it. Stop process. No, no, no. So x one is a tip. So fun mo or jeep no. I think, I think probably fun mo is kind of more like it. So fun. All right. So there we go. That was not filled with the ends of worms. So now we can just add that by just combining with gihe and making that a brief detail, gihe. So there we go. Na shulno, lo shulno, fun mo. Now one thing that I like to do is just sort of take what I've translated and pass it into the parser just to make sure that I'm not just going down the wrong path. So it parses, which is great. And I just sort of, I use purified minus, minus FM. So na rigne, we can see that na is associated with rigne, which rigne, rigne, which is good. So it means that we're negating specifically rigne, na tohe jinsa, so tohe is associated with jinsa and then we're negating that. So that's good.  So this is properly formed as a tanru, and lo shulno, fun mo is one sumti, and that applies to shulno. So it looks pretty good according to the parser. And an oozy smell. So the hole was not filled with an oozy smell. So let's say e, and then we can do ka, na shulno, not filled with, okay, an oozy smell. If it were just a smell, it would be lo, lo smell. So what's a, maybe odor, an odor. How about a stench? Is there no stench? Well, no, of course not. It's going to be an odor. It's probably a bad odor, right? Is salpanchi is an odorous with odor X2, with smell odor X3. That makes no sense at all to me. Se, basically means you swap X2 with X1 of ponchi. So this would actually be X2 is a smell emitter with odor X2 detected by observer X3. That's what that really is supposed to mean. So an odorous, I think, an odorous item, I think is what they meant to say. But in any case, the hole was not filled with an odor, sure, lo ponchi. And now, of course, it has to be an oozy odor. And of course, there's not going to be oozy in here. I mean, that just wouldn't make any sense. Is there even ooze? No. So we're going to have to look up a synonym, right? What is oozy? Clammy, mucky, that's muddy, muddy. That kind of fits what we're going for here, because a hole in, basically we're saying that the hole in the ground doesn't have a smell of like, you know, awful mud. So is there mud? There is. Der Pesku, D1 is a quantity of mud. That works pretty well. So der Pesku, der Pesku, oops, put this over here. That isn't now a tanru, meaning mud smell, so a mud type smell. I guess that would mean an oozy smell. See, ooze is basically, you know, kind of like flowing, but I think really, you know, maybe mud is flowing kind of, when I think of ooze, I kind of think of like a thick, disgusting mass, and that's kind of what mud is. So I think that's fine. Let's just tack it on. Okay. It is kind of unfortunate that here we have shulno, and we've got shulno repeated. Really, why don't we simply use a sumti connector to form, I guess an and, of la shulnu fanmo and la der Pesku panji. So that would be eh. Now I need to make sure that I have my connector right, because nah here applies to this entire thing, right? So what we're saying is not a and b. And remember, what we really wanted to say was not a or b, because that is the same as saying not a and not b, in other words, neither a nor b. So what this is saying is that a and b are not true simultaneously. One of them could be true. So I don't want eh, in fact I want ah, which is or. So that's this right over here. So I guess literally what I'm saying is here is that the hole is not filled with either the ends of worms or an oozy smell or both. So that's kind of nice. So that is how I break that up, and I think that's pretty good.  So what we're saying is here, again, it is not the hole was not dry, right? So we can start doing the same thing. Chew nah, okay, so what's dry dry, ah, sudga, ah, any other sense of dry, no, sure, arid dry, um, sandy, oh, well, it's already got sandy in here. So dry sudga, sudga, okay, and I think we're pretty safe and just tacking on gihanna. And now we need something like bear. So what is bear basically means devoid of anything. This one is bear or naked or nude without cover or clothes or protection. I do not think that that is the sense of bear. Well, I did say empty, okay, empty, kunti. It's empty. It's hollow. It's got nothing in it. Gihanna, kunti, gihanna, kunti, um, and it's not bear or empty, gihanna, now sandy. Is there a sandy? Well there's a sandy abrasive material and there is a quantity of is made of sand. Oh, that works, right, chanre, so in other words, it's not made of sand. It's just not sandy, chanre, okay, that works. So the hole is not dry and not bear and not sandy with nothing in it to sit down on, okay. So the hole ad did not have nothing in it to sit down on, okay. This is definitely a more complicated sentence here. So the hole did not have, well we know how we're going to do that, so it has nothing in it to sit down on. This is really the structure that we're going to go for and then of course we're going to tack on na. So it has nothing in it to sit down on. So let's just take a look at sit, okay, so there is sit, there's to sit, stizu is a chair, a piece or a portion of a piece of furniture intended for sitting. I think that's really the sense that Tolkien is going for here. I don't think he's saying, well there were no rocks in it. I think we're to eat, I mean he's not talking about worms to eat, but more comfortable things I think. So I think stizu is something, we want something to do with stizu. So it has no stizu. So okay, so what does it mean to have something to sit down on? So has, well okay, so there's has a chair, you know again that's kind of like or has chairs or sitting furniture, right. Again this would be writing as if we were four years old, right. So ku shu has chairs, so na, oh ka shu na, the whole has no or the whole hadn't had no as in zero has like zero chairs. It did not have na. I don't know what have is yet, but zero chairs is no, that's the number zero, okay. So what does have contain probably because a whole would contain something. So contain, see what we've got, sure includes contents, that works, vasru. So na vasru no los stizu. So what does this mean? The whole did not contain zero chairs. It did not contain zero chairs. It's kind of a funny way of putting it, but so is there some other thing that we can do because really what I want is, you know, to sit down on, right. Because no, it has no thing in it. So we know what in it is right vasru contains to sit down on no thing in it to sit down on. Now when you're creating an infinitive like that. So to sit down would be la new and what is what is the verb, what is the gizmo for sit. So this is to set basically. And of course it would mean to sit on.  So here, I kind of remember that there was some word for purpose. There isn't actually a word for purpose, but peel know is basically about like, kind of like tool use or something. So x one uses x two for purpose x three. And what I'm thinking is no thing, no thing for the purpose of sitting upon, right. So if we can have for the purpose of as sort of like a modal tag, then we can just say, you know, to sit on. And here's a nice example of the grill used a computer to get the necessary information. So unfortunately this modifies the celebrate. So here, Pee Ho, Pee Ho, is there a tap Pee Ho, no there isn't any, that's unfortunate because tap Pee Ho would would basically mean a tool usage for purpose. So I don't think I'm going to be able to use a modal tag because again, modal tags apply to celebrate not sumpti, but there is the ever useful poi, which is so you know, perhaps I can use something like well, first of all, dash D is a thing, right. So dash D is, you know, x one is a thing. And then maybe I can say dash D poi, a thing, which and then has as purpose. So let's see where where is peel know a thing which has as purpose. So that would be te peel know a thing which is used for that's not what I mean. Because it's a thing x two is the tool so set peel know. But then again, I again, I need this purpose here. So sell plea for reordered places. Let's see what that is. X one is used by x two for purpose x three again, not quite what I'm going for. See the problem is that no matter how I reorder this, I really want a tool for purpose x three right x what I want is x one is a tool for purpose x x two so is there like a tool. Well there we go. How about this x one is a whatever used for doing x two well, strictly speaking, a chair is not used for sitting right you're the one that's sitting on it. But let's go with it and see what we come up with maybe. So dash D poi to cheat. So now we have a thing which is a tool for doing x two. So we need an action or phrases and that's just that just means to sit on for for sitting upon a thing which is used for sitting upon unfortunately I really don't like it I don't like the fact that you know it's it's saying like you know a hammer is for hanging pictures it it's not you know that that's really not it.  Well maybe maybe I can use a Tanru right because it's I mean sit dash D is thing right so so Zutze dash D is a sitting thing. It could mean a thing that is sitting but you know it could also mean a thing that you're sitting on. You know in which case no lo Zutze dash D would kind of mean you know no sit type thing so no thing to sit down on it's better it's better let me think if I can come up with something else okay I don't really know why I didn't find this before but Cosmu seems reasonable X1 which is basically a new lo new an abstraction is a purpose use of X2 so if I want to say a thing for sitting on then I guess I would say so Cosmu so set Cosmu would be the object with purpose X1 right so set Cosmu set Cosmu is X1 is an object with purpose X2 or X1 has purpose X2 where X1 is a thing or what else was it a thing or an event and this is an abstraction abstraction basically meaning something with lo new in it so to sit on so really what I want is dash D X1 is a thing I think I could just say lo sec Cosmu you know which which just means a thing with a purpose now because this is a Sumti I'm going to have to say bet in order to attach another Sumti to it so be lo new so so literally what this means is thing thing with the purpose of sitting I think this is really really close to what I want and of course if I say no it means no thing for the purpose of sitting I guess that would do it so so let's get rid of this so the hole had no Vasru what was Vasru again did not contain so was devoid of the hole was not oh yeah that's not what I wanted was it the problem is that I've got pretty much a double negative here right Vasru means contains and what I want to say it does not not contain it did not oh well no I have no in here so I have no in here so it does not contain zero of these things okay so the hole does not contain zero things zero things no I have to do that zero of things with purpose to sit on okay that's that kind of does it or to eat or to eat so things for the purpose of well this is nice because now what we want to do is we want to connect this one new and then eat with which I think is see job but I'm not sure no see jazz food what's eat shit car shit car shit car so what do I want here with nothing in it for sitting on or for eating so ah something like that maybe so let's go ahead and plug this into the parser and see how the grouping happens okay so cool Navasru great no great so that's none of these things law secos move bet law news it's a ah and then these things so bet applies to all of this which I wanted to make sure I wanted to make sure that I didn't like break out of bet so I think that's pretty pretty good so what I'm saying here is that cut the hole is not does not did not contain zero of things for the purpose of sitting or eating okay so that is pretty good okay and then we have this colon and it said it was a hobbit hole and that means comfort well hobbit hole we know that that's going to be a tanru because it's a hobbit type hole so that would be reader hobby kevna more reader hobby kevna hobbit hole so the hole was a hobbit type hole now with the colon really what we're doing is we're pointing out a contrast and we saw in the last video that however is kuhi so we want to put kuhi in here however the hole or in contrast but in contrast the hole was a hobbit hole and that means comfort so what we want here is a is a causal structure and we went over cause and effect so this is the cause of the effect that it was comfortable so we could do is it what's a reha so this is a physical or mental and then there's I think kuhi I already did key I think no that's not it let me look it up well okay here let's just look at the reason creenu that's kihu is a reason justification or explanation right so kihu which comes from creenu justifiably because of reason so that's interesting after all okay so kihu means because of reasoning so it was a hobbit hole we don't want it was a hobbit hole because it was comfort comfortable we want it was comfortable because it was a hobbit hole so se will will sort of invert cause and effect so i se kihu bo bo is required to separate kihu from the rest of the sentence it basically says that kihu now sort of applies to this part and to this part so so the so the previous statement is the cause and the effect is that it was comfortable comfortable okay uh it doesn't feel comfort it is comfortable makes x2 comfortable about i really don't like this because for something to feel comfort it it it's basically a subjective experience uh is comfortable with okay so this is also a subjective experience um what we're really going for is it causes comfort so i mean this would be great and makes everyone comfortable um so kufa gao is probably pretty good therefore it makes how about everyone comfortable i se kihu i se kihu bo kuh shu kufa gao kufa gao uh raw raw just means all not read or copy raw i think just raw alone means all so let's go ahead and plug that in because i'm not sure nope doesn't like it so it's not raw and even this doesn't work oh yeah okay could yeah i think it was because of bo bo needs an e so it needs a sentence before it so kufa gao raw okay that's not gonna work um um everyone all persons right raw prenu raw prenu or even raw low prenu all persons uh so maybe that is what i need here raw low prenu let's separate that over here so in contrast the hole was a hobbit hole therefore the hole uh makes all persons comfortable so so i think that's reasonable so unfortunately i did have to break it into uh basically five sentences uh i may be able to change this to maybe just this se kihu um now se kihu takes what does it take does it take a breedy um it takes an abstraction so i think lonu so what this means here so se kihu means uh with reason uh with with cause uh and then you give it an entire uh um you give it an entire do you give it an abstraction or a breedy now i can't remember yeah i plugged it into the parser and of course it doesn't parse unless you say lonu so it basically takes a an abstraction i guess so um so basically what we're saying is here is um that it causes uh the event that the hole makes everyone comfortable do i need this here or can i leave it out like this so in other words um does the x1 position here necessarily is it necessarily the same as the x1 position here i'm gonna have to research that one and i think the answer is no you really do have to specify um because lonu does not take a breedy tail it takes an entire breedy so lonu ka shu kufa gao lonu ra loprenu means effectively um that the tunnel tunnel the the hole is giving comfort to everyone so there we go four sentences to make the the second sentence of the hobbit now it's it's rather longer and i once had a theory that um sort of the the the utterance the length of an utterance that the amount of time that an utterance takes in any language to state some concept is is constant um you know if if you just you know get it down to its bare minimum you know you don't use flowery flowery music and that's my sort of kakamimi reasoning for why spanish to my ears sounds so fast and quick uh it's because you have to get in a lot more syllables in the same amount of time in order to express the same thing that you would in english now that could totally be completely untrue i don't know um i'm not an linguist so um you know it's possible that you know this stuff can get spoken in the same amount of time as this stuff does now the other thing is that um tulkin you know was an author i mean he he wrote very well uh i am not an author so you know i would not be able to make uh to put together a sentence like this if i wanted to say exactly that even in english um so i would certainly not be able to get the same um you know the same emotions and intensity and emphasis of the english um the same senses as the english so um i would love to get rid of kak but i don't think i can because each sentence um each sentence uh has to has to have a breedy and the the breedy has to have an x1 um i suppose that um i could connect breedy tales uh that would allow me to just get rid of this part right in the same way as this part uh but the problem is that in the english you know we've got we've got commas as separators um that could mean maybe that i could use a forethought but unfortunately there's no forethought connector for breedy tales there's only afterthought connectors so i i just can't do that so i think i'm just probably going to leave it here like this and if anybody has uh any other ideas that that uh you know maybe i should have tried leave it in the comments um i am going to really go out on a limb and open myself up to criticism by putting this sentence into one of the live chats for for the lojban language and you know just hoping that uh somebody recognizes it and uh and uh has something constructive to say about it um i know that when i've put in some simple sentences into the lojban chat uh i have gotten corrections and don't get me wrong i've learned from them but it was a little bit depressing so i'll i'll see what happens and you know hope for the best so anyway i guess that's about all i wanted to to do in this video is just translate this one sentence um if you like that um well give it a like obviously um if you don't like it give it a dislike uh it's all it's all impressions um but obviously i'd like more likes than dislikes and if you're really interested you know please let me know that you'd like me to continue trying to translate some of these sentences from the hobbit um the next sentences are also fairly long i think um it goes on and on about like describing the the tunnel and the hallway and the doors that are on it and well it describes the the front door that it has a little shiny brass knob and a round window like a porthole and and the tunnel goes into the into the hill and it's got you know lots of peg holes and it's got lots of doors opening out onto kitchens and pantries and you know all that stuff uh it just goes on and on and on so that that might be kind of fun to translate um i kind of like the fact that the first sentence is approximately the same length as the as the as the first sentence in english um not so much uh the second set of sentences uh but okay that's fine i'll i'll take it um anyway i guess that's about it so thanks for watching i hope you had kind of a an entertaining time and i will see you on the next video and i did spot one issue here which is remember that i said that kuh refers to the previous sumti that started with k so i do have to scan to see if i have anything starting with k and i do um although this is not a sumti so i can continue uh this is a sumti though so i think unfortunately that means that i need to take this kuh and change it to la kevna and let's see and this kuh uh refers to this kevna which is fine okay now i think it's good and uh when i did give this to the chat uh one suggestion did come up which i kind of like um is that sure new fun mo worm ends should probably be using jipno so before i was looking at jipno and i decided to go with fun mo um and it turns out that fun mo is more like the last part of something whereas uh jipno is just you know a tip or a point um and if we look at uh this page here in lojban.org there is a lot of um interesting example sentences for a lot of gizmo and fun mo does seem to indicate that this is like the final part or the the ending not an end as in you know the last thing so i think i'm just going to change fun mo to jipno and now we'll call it done