So we've been receiving a lot of requests. What's the deal? How does the sweep leg action work? Well, we've got some videos we just put up and we're talking about it specifically today. Is it go wide? Does it go narrow? Does it go fast? Does it go slow? We're gonna talk about it in this video, so check it out. Everybody, it's Eric Johnson from Airtate Throws Nation. In today's video, we're gonna talk about a simple thing that I've been seeing all kinds of throwers doing wrong. And you might say, well, coach, how could you be seeing all kinds of throwers doing this wrong? We're in the middle of a quarantine. It doesn't make any sense. You're not seeing any throwers. Well, we are still working with a small group of our throwers here and there, sneaking out, maintaining social distance. But the one thing that we have been doing is we've been doing a series of webinars every week and we're doing members training. And so we're getting videos submitted to us from our members all over the United States and actually all around the world. And so one of the things that we're noticing is what we're gonna talk about in this video and it's gonna help you guys as well. So what is that one thing? Well, one of the things that we're talking about is the path of the sweep leg. So one thing is that it has to be long. Now, if you looked at some of our recent videos, we've talked about some home training, talk about critical drills that are gonna add distance real fast, like doing 180s and 360s, because they teach the entry axis and they teach a really critical thing of how we're gonna sequence upper body, lower body, you're gonna see that. So I can do a drill pretty simply and I can move around and you can see how I'm gonna be able to keep it wide. Now watch when I'm doing that drill, is that right or is that wrong? It's not 100% right and here's why. The thing that we wanna do and the problem and the drill we want you guys to focus on, we're giving you one of our drills from our system, it's a really simple drill and we're teaching the action of the sweep. So one of the things we've done for a lot of times is we tend to put a cone here. When you tend to see young throwers who tend to cut in, right, so you see a lot of throwers and they cut this way and they're spinning here, the one thing is we've always put a cone here so we teach our athletes to get out. The other thing that we tend to do is work the band. Here we go, band on the knees. So here's one of the things we do for years and now we incorporated putting the band and creating stretch on the band. Now, can I create stretch on the band slowly? You can. Now, the drill that we're gonna talk about is the sweep leg kick. If you're an online member, we go through this in a different level of detail because we, online members are utilizing the system and so there's a whole connection sequence, right? Our throwing chain reaction.  This will put two to three feet on your shot put right away. It's a really simple drill and what you wanna do is the following. So when we talked about this, we've trained athletes to come out, right? So now you can see how it's gonna help me take the wide path. So now when we use the band, we hinge and we're creating tension here. We want tension in the legs. So if you look at me this way, when I turn and I'm creating this, a really great example of that is looking at Daniel Stahl, looking at Frederick Dakers, right? He gets a really wide base and so when he goes, he gets that, you would see how the band would create that tension. This is one of the reasons why we incorporated. We wanna start teaching our athletes to feel that and our bands are a really easy tool to provide that feedback. Now, when we go over here and we're talking about how we're gonna create stretch, we're gonna be kicking out. So to create that stretch, you automatically have to do what?  It should make you move your sweep leg faster. So we use the band as part of that process and we use the upper body and we're feeling that motion. So one of the drills, again that we use in our system, we talk is the sweep leg kick. And so one of the things we're gonna do is we're gonna be hinging, opening long, staying here and we're gonna be getting that sweep leg to kick out. And again, for years we've done stuff like the cone and a lot of times people will put things and they'll kick over here. To us, that starts the motion late. You look at somebody like Robert Harding, you look at Daniel Stahl, you look at Frederick Dakers, you look at Malachowski, you look at all these top throwers and what you're gonna notice is that that sweep leg is really roaring early and fast. So we have multiple ways of doing it and this is always the challenge when you're a thrower or a coach, not one way fits all, that's one of the things. That's also something that we take into account, that's one of the things that our system is really good about, that we have six pillars and we identify the issues in each of the pillars so that we can create a custom formula for every athlete. Wanna learn more about our system? Check that link below. So one of the things, again, the sweep leg kick is really a pretty simple drill. Again, we tend to break it down. We know you guys aren't gonna wanna sit here and listen to 15 minutes of explanation on the drill. That's why we have our membership for those of you guys that really wanna dive deep. We did a video talking about the sweep leg path. The right side is the rotational side. The left side is the linear side, right? It's moving this way. Now it has to have some degree of rotation from the left foot into this position here but the key is, what are we seeing all the time? Here. Okay, now watch when I do the drill here. Right? So a more aggressive sweep leg and getting that leg out and around is absolutely gonna add distance now, I guarantee you.  Go get into your throws. Get your sweep leg much more active. You're gonna notice the increase in speed. Speed is the name of the game. That's one of the things that we're always focusing with the throwing chain reaction system. We're getting our athletes on balance. We're teaching balance, repeatable positions. That in turn is able to automatically get faster and we have to know how to increase the speed. The shot put, again, being a more rotational sweep is gonna be more this way, right? So this is where we're gonna be rotating here and kicking it out this way and so you're gonna, again, you're gonna notice that I'm gonna be there, okay? And again, who I think does that phenomenally well, Joe Kovacs, Tom Walsh and really Ryan Krauser, those guys have incredible sweeps. You look at all these guys, you're gonna notice that they have these really dynamic, aggressive sweep legs. So the sweep leg is a vital part of the throw. So at any rate, that's gonna be your simple drill for today. This is how you're gonna add that distance. Quick, go out, try it, put this to use. Comment below, we wanna hear how many of you this helps. We're really confident this is a really simple thing to learn how to do it. Now, there are tricks and there's timing and there's other aspects and there's the pillar one and the setup, but for the most part, getting that sweep leg much more active and aggressive right from the beginning of the throw keeps it moving fast and helps it accelerate and helps you move through your finish a lot better and that additional speed means further throws. So thanks so much for watching guys. Like you said, hit that smash that subscribe button for me, little thumbs up action. Comment again, tell us how this drill works for you and we'll see you on the next video.


Charlie, the William Weld Professor here at the Harvard Law School and a co-founder of the Berkman Center and also, of course, the founder of the Poker Society internationally, teaches, most importantly, for this context, evidence where he really thinks about information that's necessary to persuade, information in context, how we deal with all these human biases and limitations of our corporeal selves and try to assess a societal version of the truth collectively. So Charlie, take us away towards lunch. A Jonathan Zittrain and I started the Berkman Center as a means of claiming and reclaiming, building an open cyberspace that would somehow integrate with all our lives in ways that would make life better. So truthiness is a rhetorical poker game that the net lets people play. There is a truth that is self-evident, that all men are created equal. This moral truth defines Americans as a people. Built on this moral foundation, our founders wrote our constitution in our name. I am a teacher of evidence and the American jury. These are two classes. Both are about the American means for determining legal truth. In evidence, we study what legal truth is and how the law lord makes it using jury trial and then how the law lord plays it in the rhetorical poker game of truthiness that's played with the other lords of truth who vie for mind space and credibility. The journalism lord, the science lord, the lord of religion, to name just a few of the others. I'm not sure that this is, can you see this cube two ways? Can you all see it two ways? Is there anyone who cannot see it two ways? Is there anyone who can see it both ways at the same time? No, you can't because to see it in a different way, you must change your point of view. So this becomes a metaphor for truth. In the American jury class, we study the place of the American jury in American life. As conceived by our founders, the jury and its truthiness lay at the foundation of the American Republic and at the core of American civic life. In the class, we study the decline of the jury under the pressures of American corporatism and American racism. As you look at the Necker cube and contemplate the two-sidedness of truth, you can ask yourself, is there a truth we share? Well, I believe there is a truth we share. I think it's our sense of justice. I think of the great Paul Newman depiction in the verdict, his closing argument, when he speaks to the jury and says, you are the law. I believe there is justice in our hearts. So the truth, the verdict, ver dicto, speak the truth. That's what juries are told to do. This is Bill Stuntz. Bill taught criminal justice here for the last part of his career. He started at the University of Virginia. At the age of 49, he learned that he had colon cancer. And he set about then writing the book that is the statement of his life, called The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. It's a book I recommend to all of you. This is the honest statement of a man who was archly conservative in his way, an evangelical Christian, rock, rib, Republican, but a book in which he tells us what he learned. And it's in some way quite surprising. His thesis focuses on what you might call the romance of American justice with proceduralism and its disconnection from the feeling of justice, the extent to which law developed through the war and period and after, the idea that to defend freedom, we do it with procedure. But somehow looking at the procedures in a way that at the end of the day make us blind to the result that comes out and is justified at the other end, so that our prisons are bursting with discrimination. The system that used to be based with a jury at its core now works almost entirely in terms of prosecutorial discretion. So this is a passionate book. I want to introduce you to a case and to an idea. Yeah, I'm going to. We'll hear argument next in case 10, 13, 20, Blueford versus Arkansas. What is that? That's the audio recording of the opening of a case that was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States. Oh, we could go Wednesday. All of the Supreme Court cases, arguments are recorded. And the opportunity to be in the environment of the argument with this kind of life is remarkable. So this was Blueford versus Arkansas, the issue before the Supreme Court, a question of double jeopardy. A guy's prosecuted for first degree murder with manslaughter a lesser included offense. The jury is instructed to consider the first degree murder charge first. And only if they all vote to acquit to move on down to the consideration of the manslaughter charge, they retire. They consider the capital offense. They vote unanimously to acquit. They move on down to the manslaughter charge. They can't agree. They hang. They come back in. The judge sends them out to reconsider again. They come back in where hung. A mistrial is declared. The issue is the prosecutor now re-prosecutes the defendant and includes in the prosecution first degree murder. And the defendant says, I was put in jeopardy before a jury of my peers already once. And they acquitted me. And the issue before the Supreme Court is exactly this issue that Stuntz is focused on. Procedurally, there is no final verdict. In justice, this man has been put in trial for his life before 12 of his peers. And they voted to acquit. Our champion in this fight, you will recognize, I hope, Elena Kagan. What the judge said, what the prosecutor said, what the defense counsel said, and then what the jury said, it's clear that they all thought that they had to unanimously agree on something before they could go to the next crime. And again, there's no suggestion in what anybody said that they could go back up. Is there any suggestion that they couldn't go back up? That is extraordinarily important. And isn't it usually assumed that the jury is not finished until it's finished? Just a clip. But you get it. It's Scalia against Kagan. It's substance against procedure. And this is a fight that we will see in many forms as the wisdom of Bill Stuntz penetrates further and further into our judicial thought. With the net, we have the potential to break through to the truth of we the people, the truth we look to in ourselves, and we feel as fairness. So there was, at one point earlier in my career, a play with television in which I moderated with Fred Friendly as producer, a series called The Constitution, that delicate balance. Fred Friendly, I consider to be a mentor and a person who stood in back of us as we had the idea of the Berkman Center. It was initially an idea that had public education very much in its mind. I believe that we are now at a point where we can reach for, excuse me for one moment, where we can reach for those aspirations of public education. And when I say public education, I mean it as public civic education. Education, excuse me, education about what it means, what it is to be a citizen, what it is to participate, what it is to actually be part of building a civic society and constructing it with your membership. I taught my class yesterday. I'm about to now to go to the second class. Yesterday, my students watched 12 Angry Men, marvelous. And they watched it in the context of thinking about the jury room as a rhetorical poker environment, where the idea is to pay attention to the techniques by which one juror bullies another and to the techniques by which the bullying is overcome. It's an opportunity I'm hoping to carry forward what I see as the wisdom of Lady Gaga on the one hand, the hook that she represents into the sensibility of, to me, a world, and the brilliance of John Paul Frey, whom I believe walks on water. I speak specifically of the Digital Public Library of America and the potential that I feel in it to treat library as community space, as place where education takes place. And for me, that has to do with a combination, an aspiration to teach law and poker through the net and to have it be a participatory event in which God bless them, people come to libraries and play. I'm now the principal investigator of a Berkman project called the Mindsport Research Project. It's a conceptualization of strategic games as something as important for kids to engage in as physical sport. And it starts with connect for and checkers and chess and bridge and poker. And the idea of imagining cyberspace, not as just a virtual space, but as an integration of the virtual and the real, the online environment that would support gatherings and community environments where people play the games face to face that they learn and enjoy to play online. And to use that as the core of an intellectual spine to teach the way poker in the real world actually works. So that's my inflection point. Thank you all very much. Please have lunch.


Hello, welcome to SSUnitex, so we'll decide and this is continuation of PySpark interview questions and answers. So recently one of my friend has attended interview with Delight. So this question was asked there. So let's assume we are having an input data frame that is having total two columns. First is the department name and second is the gender. So in the output of this data frame, we want to have the department name and how many total employees that we have. How many male employees that we have and how many female employees that we have. So how we can achieve this output? So you can pause this video and you can think how we can achieve it. So let's start. So first what we can do, we will be going to create total four columns. First could be your department name and second could be your male employee. Third could be your female employee. In the department, we can go with IT and here if the gender is male, then we want to have one, otherwise we'll be going to have as null. So in the second row, here we can see it is having the female. So this time your male will be null and your female will be one. Once we'll be going to generate this data frame, then we can go and simply create one more data frame that could be your final data frame. So it will be having department name. And total employee and then the male employee, then the female employee. So here the department name will be IT and the total we can get the count on the group by department name. So here it should be have four. In the male employee, we can go and sum of this male employee column that we have created. Similarly, the sum of the female employee that we have created here. So by using this approach, we can simply get it. So let's jump to browser and we'll try to see in practical. So here let me try to execute the cell for creating this data frame. And it is having the same data that we have seen in slide and Excel. So now next, as I told you, we can simply select the department name column. So we can go with department name. So df1.department name. And this would be df1 not the df. Here we can use the when condition. So when function is not all able directly. So we have to use the pyspark.sql and we can import this when function. So inside the when function, we can simply check df1.gender. If this gender value is male, then we wanna have one. And let me put the alias of this as male employee. Similarly, we can also do the same thing for the female. And this time we'll be checking this as female. And here the alias we can put as female. Let me put this into another data frame that could be df2. And let me use the display of this df2. So it should be having total three columns. First is the department name. Second is the male employee and third is the female employee. So till now we are good. Next, we can simply go with df2.groupby. In the groupby, we can specify department name. Next, we can use aggregate and inside this df2, we can specify your count. So the count function we can simply use for checking the total number of employee. So total number of employee we can go with department name. So we can simply get the count of this department name. And let me put the alias of this as total employee. Now, next we can also go and try to do the sum of this df2.male. So this will be total male employee. So let me put the alias of this as total male employee. The same thing we can also do like sum of this df2.female. So this will be your total female employee. Let me put the alias of this as total female employee. Let me put this into display. Then we'll see the output of this. So it should be going to have the output as expected. If we can scroll down. So here we can see we have the department name as IT. It is having total four employee, three male and one female. In the HR department, we can see total five employee. All those are female. So in the male, we can see null. And here we can see the sale. So in the sale, we have total six employee, four male and two female employees. So by using this approach, we can simply achieve it. So I hope guys you have understood how we can write the query for getting this output. So thank you so much for watching this video. See you in the next video.


Hello and welcome to the first ever bunt and bad baseball festival first pitch to the at bat shows bunt but doesn't bunt university of the pacific is winning by two runs they're beating university of san diego that was a curveball ball it's a fastball ball fastball and it hits them so he showed bunt on the first pitch ultimately gets hit takes first base he's the first runner of the inning next guy up what's he gonna do is what is that he put his bat in front of him okay and then he shows bunt first pitch takes it shows bunt second pitch takes it shows bunt third pitch strike two and one's the count he's gonna foul that one off now he's got two strikes on him no more bunting he fouls that one off he fouls that one off two two still fouls that one off good ab takes ball three full count fouls that one off walk that's the best display of baseball you're going to see this inning he battled there coach says no outs no outs no outs and they gave that picture the heave ho so you're out of here they bring in a new pitcher they say hey man trust your defense just let just trust your defense we'll get we'll pick you up okay so now we're showing bunt super early lefty comes out first pitch and they get the bunt down the third baseman gobbles it up and oh no air mails it so all the runners move and the run scores and the tying run gets the third base for the next batter is he gonna show bunt on the first pitch because everybody has so far four for four they all showed bunt he gets it down to the pitcher turns throws and another error which scores another run oh the next batter shows bunt again and he shows bunt again and he gets it down and they don't get him so that's just like an infield single or sack I mean yeah they score another run oh and he's I gotta pause it they're all every batter five for five has showed bunt on the first pitch how did this happen did did that the pacific have to put in a bunch of pitchers to play the infield and they took advantage of it were they bunting all game how did we get to the eighth inning and they just decided everybody bunt anyway that's a foul ball he doesn't get it down is he gonna stick with the bunting approach duh of course he is oh one goes to bunt again hit by pitch so now the bases are loaded there's still no outs they've taken the lead next batter swinging are you gonna swing why you're swinging you got a donut on are you just gonna practice bunting are you gonna swing he doesn't show bunt he shows a little but though with his little thing let's see a little like a little twisty he's taken a lot of pitches and a four pitch walk okay so maybe they would have rather to bunt because they walked in a run on four pitches anyway that guy not showing bunt next batter comes up first pitch he shows bunt six out of seven batter showed bunt on the first pitch that isn't out but they score a run so that's a sack bunt that's like a standard baseball play one of the few ones we're gonna see here next batter the bunt's off they're up by three there's two runners on drive them in bud two oh and that's in place second baseman gobbles it up hesitates hesitates hesitates safe safe catcher hesitates hesitates they run to second he doesn't what the hell's going on another run scores during all that oh my god so the balls hit to the second baseman who's playing in he gobbles it up almost acts as if he's gonna look like it's almost like he told himself gobble it up and look the runner back to third but the runner was just running so it was you don't have to look them back just throw home and then he's safe catcher comes up doesn't let him doesn't let the ball take him to the base then the runner run first is like I'll go to second and the shortstop he's more interested in catching it and throwing home so he doesn't get the guy out nor does he gobble up the ball and another run scores so now the coach comes out and says hey man it's not your fault it's not your fault well you're out of the game we're bringing in this dude who's got a nice little jaunty run I mean that's alrighty but he's he's jogging in like he's a lefty look at that jaunty run done done done done first pitch high okay next pitch pass ball runner on second moves to third oh no this pitcher and the catcher do not get along that's fouled back two and one on the dirt three and one walk throws the bat throws the padding next batter comes up first and third one out steals second oh boy now it's second and third oh no that's another pass ball okay the runners stay put that's good news that's let's get it together strike one let's get it together full count oh my goodness wild pitch catcher has no idea where it is run comes home to score and the batter goes to first because that was ball four now it's 14 to eight we got another runner on third this kids up takes that pitch takes that one oh my god the curveball doesn't break wild pitch another run scores what is going on high fastball two and two holy smokes runner advances full count in play third baseman gobbles it up throws across the diamond where was that all inning that's a nice play but the runner did score there's two outs now oh another curveball doesn't break there you go one and one two and one finish strong here there's no one on base two and two and they strike them out and end the inning oh my god so to recap it went the bad plays were hit by pitch walk error error infield single hit by pitch walk sack bunt fielder's choice error pass ball walk stolen base wild pitch wild pitch ultimately san diego plated 10 runs on just one hit in the bottom of the eighth taking advantage of two pacific errors while bringing home every runner that reached base if you're into zany and quirky baseball go check out our dudes we got ice and maybe you need to laugh after watching this which is just stressfully bad so go watch we got ice they make a ton of fun videos and they're cool i like them


Welcome, everybody, back to the Independent Investor Channel for my M1 finance tutorials. This is something that I regularly roll out on the channel. I haven't done these for a while, and the portfolios have grown. They do a funny thing when you ignore them. In this video, I'm going to jump into the dividend growth portfolio comprised of 95 holdings across all 11 sectors. I've strategically broken up the sectors. I'll give you some insights on how I have done that and actually go through the total comprehensive list of the dividend holdings that make up this dividend growth portfolio. As mentioned in this video, I will provide you a courtesy copy of the dividend growth portfolio in its entirety, all 95 stocks. All you have to do is just email me and I'll send you a link to the portfolio in its entirety for direct use or indirect referential use. I do that free of charge as a service to my subscriber base to the Independent Investor Channel. With that, guys, we'll kick in here and take a look at the performance of the dividend growth portfolio. Another exciting opportunity to share with you guys an update on a portfolio that is somewhat novel in its approach, but it is working out fantastic for me. This is my dividend growth portfolio. This is comprised of close to 100 holdings. I think I'm just shy of that at 97, 98, something like that. It doesn't really matter. I've had the account since December of 2019, so just under two and a half years old. It's performed fantastic. Bring your attention over here to the earned dividends, which are ever-increasing with this portfolio. I dividend reinvest or portfolio reinvest the dividends as they come in, so I don't render any income off of this. There's no point to that. That's not why I built this. I built this to get up to a sizeable six-figure amount and continue to fund this on a dollar cost schedule, which is fairly modest. It works for me. It allows me to segue a little bit of surplus capital to the tune of about $150 every two weeks, so $300 a month goes into this. I don't miss the money. It goes in here. It helps embolden the bottom line of the portfolio, and it's done quite well for me. The market gains here at just over $8,300. Total dividends rendered to the portfolio just shy of $2,000. Total capital gain in this portfolio, $10,302. Nothing too crazy. You've got to stack a high society for doing nothing but just investing in the stock market. You be the judge is investing gambling. If you went to the casino and won $10,000, you would have thought that your life had changed. In just under two and a half years, I've been able to build this portfolio up to something and didn't rely on luck to do so. I relied on a good sound plan, and that plan has to do with how I've broken down this portfolio. I'm going to share it with you now. Here is the chart over time, slightly angled and up swinging to the right. We can go down here and check here. Looks like we're down in a couple of sectors, which is totally fine. For the most part, the portfolio has done quite well. We're looking at energy being the top outperformer here. Technologies will catch fire with those latest earnings that have come out. Healthcare has been just a silent killer throughout the entire year and into last year as well. We don't leave out any sectors here. We want to make sure that we're gaining from all of the sector inflows as appropriate. These sectors in and of themselves, I'll click in here and just show you technology for example. You guys have an idea. These are comprised of single stock. These are comprised of single stock with the emphasis on dividends. You might be wondering why I don't own Apple, why I don't own Microsoft in here. Those are comprised or held in other accounts, much larger accounts in much larger amounts. The dividend portfolio was aimed to take the stocks that I wanted to own in lighter amounts and group these together. Now, these are wonderful companies. Cisco in and of itself could be a core holding, but I've chosen to really allocate my capital in this way and it's really paid off. It's really been quite nice for me. Let's go back here to the portfolio and just take a quick look. Let's see if we can jump back in here. That's how that's comprised. That's technology and then we jump in here to Staples just to give you another example of how I've got this broken down. Now, I do have this portfolio to share with the grander subscriber group. You're going to have to email me and I will share this portfolio. I do not seek out affiliate income anymore through M1 Finance. I actually just share these free of charge. All you have to do is email me and I'll send you a link to this entire portfolio in its entirety, all 98 holdings. This is just the staple section. This is quite large companies like Diageo, BTI, British American Tobacco Kellogg, Unilever, Colgate, Palmolive, Altria Group, Wal-Mart, Philip Morris, Heinz, Procter & Gamble, Mondelez, Kimberly Clark, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Costco to round out the top end of this group here. Now, this is just Staples. About 13 holdings in there, I guess, is what I counted, 15 consumer Staples. Very cool. Let's kick in here and we'll look at the total comprehensive list of the holdings. 95 holdings, so close. I've got a little pay dirt here. I've got a little leeway. The reason why I'll leave a little bit at the top is for when some of these large companies, which these are beastly large companies, okay? When they spin off, I will be forced to sell the shares if I carry 100 holdings in here, so I carry a little bit of insurance buffer at the top of this portfolio because 100 is the max and M1 Finance won't allow you to hold any more than 100 in one given portfolio pie. I hold a little bit of room at the top. Otherwise, I would fill this up with 100, but I've had that happen before where I think it was Exxon that spun off Woodford, I believe, or Woodside. As a subsidiary, and I earned shares in it, and I was forced to have to buy into the company or parlay off the shares, but you can see here from a dollar perspective, I'm about a buck away from 1,000 on my top end holding. You can see here how each of these holdings, only one is close to $1,000 in the holding with Shell and then McDonald's leading up second largest holding here. These will change over time as the dollar amounts change, but you get down into the 700 mark. I've got three $700 holdings and a good handful of $600 holdings here with Cisco and Abvy, Southern Company, Duke Energy, which are great dividend payers. There's Travelers Insurance Company, a Dow component. Down in Intel, we know that that's been really crushed IBM has just not gone anywhere in the last 10 years. That's fine. I'll just render the dividend and be happy to do so. Home Depot here, American Tower, REIT, Goldman Sachs, Digital Royalty, which has just been crushed here on the REIT side of the house, which is fine. MasterCard has done well. This has been a real disappointment. Disney has just really underperformed. They'll get their act together and turn that story around. Merck has been fantastic. Starbucks, WP Carry, ExxonMobil, fantastic. Look at that Sonofi, fantastic performance there. Dominion being down. I would buy Dominion here, certainly. Texas Instrument, that's a surprise to me, as well as STAG with data storage. That's a surprise to me, those two, but it is what it is. If I was investing in the stock market, never to be surprised. I don't think I would be doing it right. Look at Lindy. Look at Lind. That's a fantastic holding right there. Look at Air Products. Two of my favorite in the material sector. You bet. T-Mobile doing great. That's actually my carrier. I'm not sure what all the hype is about. I don't think they're the best. I think Verizon is the best, and Verizon gets no love at all in the stock market. Pepsi, TJ Maxx, there's Enbridge, there's Costco up $100 bill, right? AT&T still struggling to get out of their own way. I believe that they will in time. There's a good stretch of negative there, Leggett and Platt down pretty good. I would buy Leggett and Platt right here. Mm-hmm. AMD, Medtronic, Caterpillar, Morgan Stanley, there's Bristol Myers Squibb down to touch. I would buy Bristol Myers here. Coca-Cola, medical properties, REIT, that's pretty disappointing. Verizon, very disappointing there on the Dow component. Verizon, very disappointing. Cold storage. It's actually doing quite well. That's actually up, contrary to the rest of the holdings in the REIT space. John Deere, one of my faves, Kimberly Clark, United Health, almost own a share of her. So you can own fractional shares within M1. And so it's kind of cool. You can own piece of these companies like Cummins, right? Bank of America down huge with the banking debacle going on. That happens. Well, it'll recover when banks decide to recover. There's Raytheon Technology, one of my favorites. There's Mondalees, Northrop Grumman, Hines, General Dynamic, FedEx, Warner Brothers has just been an absolute disaster since it was spun off 3M. Altria Group doing fine. The banks, again, all the banks are going to be down right now, which is totally fine. We'll buy the sector when it's down. JP Morgan, that's a big surprise there. But yes, some pretty good red on the bottom end of this, met life, some insurers are down. Anything financial related is down. And it's fallen to the bottom of the list here. I will look for that to recover. But like I said, funding this account with about $300 a month, it's a program that anybody can adhere to.  The idea here is that we're offering relative ideas that the masses can enjoy and seek out their exposure to the markets and become a participant in financial markets, as opposed to a spectator. Guys, I appreciate you tuning in. We will kick you back and we'll conclude the video. And so we've come out of the Dividend Growth portfolio. Hope you've enjoyed. This is a cool way of spreading out your wealth. There's going to be pockets of weakness in any of the sectors at any given time. And this is a cool way of absorbing that pressure. I don't think you're going to get rich overnight investing in this capacity. But I don't think that's the point. And I think a lot of people underestimate the power of protecting your money to the downside. Yes, going for capital appreciation. This portfolio has done that. Going for dividend growth. This portfolio has done this. But I think what a lot of investors miss is the seeking out protection to the downside.  I've been very satisfied with its ability to weather storms and be defensive in nature. I really hope you guys appreciated the transparency of this offering here. If you enjoy the content, I'd invite you to subscribe to the channel. We do all kinds of different products on the Independent Investor channel. We have the independentinvestorgroup.com. That is independentinvestorgroup.com where I offer my Viper group. You can sign up for a year's membership on that offering. We do have social media presence on TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, as well as Facebook, which is now meta. We have a Facebook group there, which I would cordially invite you to join. If you enjoy the content, man, leave your comments at the bottom. Give me a shout out. Tell me what's going on. Hit the thumbs up on the video. It helps to support the message. And as always, good luck in your investment future.


Well, our next case is a 30-year-old female who's got left-sided weakness after a Kiari decompression. Let's have a look at some of the images. The Sagittal T1 series shows a pretty round appearance of the cerebellar tonsils. In no way are they compressed or peg-like. And it looks like one of your colleagues, Dr. Schupeck, went in here and took out the occipital bone and made plenty of room for the cerebellar tonsils. There is a little bit of cerebrospinal fluid in the cisterna magna. It's not compressed. There's no fluid outside of this area. When we look at the axial T1 weighted image, let's focus on the cranioservical junction. It looks fantastic. It looks like the surgeon really made a lot of room for the patient, the cord, and the cranioservical junction is completely unencumbered. And the ventricular size is totally normal. So I am a little baffled. I'm wondering maybe if her symptoms aren't coming from the cervical spine. And I might look at the entire cervical spine as a neuro-imager. Let me ask you the first question. And perhaps you can enlighten me as to what is going on here, because I don't have a clue. What's the diagnosis? A, inadequate decompression. B, hydrocephalus with slip ventricles. C, pseudo meningocel. D, cerebellar tosis. E, dandy walker continuum. OK. I am going to go with cerebellar tosis. But let me take some of these other possibilities that you mentioned. Inadequate decompression. I think you dealt with that. There is a suboccipital craniectomy that goes all the way up pretty much to the sinus, really beyond the equator of the cerebellum. So you can't say that's inadequate. So I think that one is out. Pseudo meningocel, generally this procedure, or at least in some manifestations of it, will include a dural graft that can leak. Pseudo meningocel is a very common cause of failure. But I don't really see one here. So you would expect the CSF to be out in here somewhere. Right. In the soft tissues, evidence of a CSF leak. So we don't really see a pseudo meningocel. OK, what about dandy walker continuum? Dandy walker continuum, because it's a continuum, can have a lot of manifestations. But one of the ones that's going to be true of all of them is that the inferior cerebellar vermis is going to be involved in some way. It looks pretty healthy right there. Sure. In fact, it looks kind of chubby. Right. And then you also lose the bottom of the fourth ventricle, or at least the fourth ventricle, is very wide and gaping and communicates with this area, which isn't present here. So let me move on to the next question. And I just want you to think about one thing.  But we'll get to that in a second. Because I think most imagers have no idea of that condition. I've never heard of it. Question two, causes of posterior fossa decompression failure in Kiari may include which of the following? A, insufficient posterior fossa decompression? B, overvigorous compression? C, unrecognized hydrocephalus? D, pseudomonin-gaseal formation? Or E, all of the above? I am going to go with all of the above, but I'm going to focus on the one that you mentioned, which is cerebellar ptosis. That would be great, because I never heard of that. Right. And what can occur is the idea, of course, is you want to decompress the tonsils to reestablish flow in the CSF spaces at the base of the skull, because that's part of the problem. On the other hand, you can be too successful. That is, if that suboccipital craniectomy is taken above the equator of the cerebellum, as it is in this case, cerebellum can drop down. And I think you can see that there's a little bit of an impression on the cerebellum by the residual occipital bone right there. And in a sense, can reestablish some of this obstruction. And that is a poorly understood cause and not that uncommon cause of failure. So the bone is pressing on the cerebellum, and the cerebellum is kind of sagging down a little more. It's sagging down and can reproduce some of the obstruction at a different place in the CSF pathway. So unlike eyelid ptosis, where your eyelid droops, now the cerebellum is drooping. Cerebellum is drooping. So cerebellar ptosis is the diagnosis. I learned something new today from my esteemed neurosurgical colleague. We'll move on to the next case.


Here's some mahogany that I cut yesterday. I'm only... I'm basically only cutting the thickness. I'm not worrying about this distance because this is going to be cut on lumber mill to get an exact distance here because these are all going to be joists. So this surface doesn't really matter, but I need exact measurements there and there. So I'll do those cuts on the lumber mill. And these are some boards I did. Like last week, you can see they get a lot darker, more reddish-brown after you cut them and they're out for a few days. All right, I'm out here cutting wood for my second floor. Oh, camera's getting a little fogged up. It started raining. Anyway, there's a lot of different ways I can do this. I'd kind of like to take these logs out of here right to my lumber mill and cut them all there, which would mean either rolling them or putting them on wheels and carting them out of here. But I'm about 300 meters from the boat and there's no smooth path to get out of here yet. I want to have one eventually, but right now I don't and I really want to get this floor up. So I'm doing it the way I can do it right now, which is take my chainsaw and cut these. This is mahogany, otherwise known as myo rojo around here. Anyway, take my chainsaw and just cut this into slabs, into slices, and then take the slabs to my lumber mill and then, you know, cut the cut the widths there. So like say I'm trying to make a two by six. I'll cut the twos here, take it to my lumber mill, cut the sixes there, because if I'm cutting joists, I really want the six dimension to be accurate. The two dimension doesn't have to be perfect, so I can do chainsaw that. And the same with floorboards. You know, the top and bottom surfers of the floorboards, they're not super important right away, but the sides where the floorboards are sitting up next to each other, I want those to be straight, so I'll cut those on the lumber mill too.  But anyway, I'll worry about that later. Right now, I want to cut this into slabs. There is a problem though, if I just cut this into slices, I'll get a couple good slices, and then all the middle ones will split, because the way this wood works, it like, it always wants to bend away from the center. So if I cut some slabs off over here, they'll kind of warp this way a little bit, but as I get more toward the center, the top part and the bottom part will be trying to warp away from each other, so it'll end up with split ends. So to avoid that, I'm just going to cut this right down the middle, lay the pieces down, and then cut the slices. And you know, I won't get as big boards then, but I won't have some crooked curve going right through the middle. I'll have, at least I'll have a straight cut going through the middle. So that's, that's what I did over here. So these guys are all basically, you know, half the, half the log. Man, not a good job on that. Look at those. Man, I'm getting really good. It's just amazing how fast you can learn a skill like this. Humans are cool. Humans are super cool. I love humans. Well, I don't, I don't love when they're not meeting their potential, but like, the potential humans have is so awesome. Anyway, all right, I'm gonna, I'm gonna cut this in half. Oh, and I obviously rolled the log until I found a crack that's going vertical. So I'll basically cut right along that crack to get rid of it. And then there's another crack going around here, but hopefully that doesn't run very, very deep through the wood. To get my straight lines, like a lot of people use a chalk line for this. I'm just using a previous board that I cut that is pretty darn straight. And I'll just lay it there and, you know, just run the chainsaw along the side of it. Of course, now you're gonna be like, well, how do you get the first board cut? Oh, I don't know. I just eyeball it, keep checking it and try to get it, get it really straight.  I gotta get this going, man. I'm gonna measure one and three quarter, yeah, one and three quarter noodle units. And that way I'll end up with a true one and a half. Now, when I do a cut down the length of something, the first cut I'll do, I'll look down the chainsaw blade, you know, the chainsaw bar, and also look through the cut I've already done and make sure they're, like, if my eye is lined up with the cut I've already done and it's also lined up with the chainsaw, that means they're parallel so I can cut straight the whole way down. But then once I have a side that's flat, I'll keep my eye looking along the edge of here and then I know the distance between there and there and I'll move over a tiny bit, make sure the chain bar is lined up with my eye and I'll just keep going back and forth like that. And as long as I can see down a flat edge here, it's really easy to keep the line parallel to that. Well, maybe I shouldn't say really easy, but I mean it's tedious because you have to pay attention. Although once you kind of get used to it, you know, just holding the chainsaw the same way the whole time, it kind of defaults to pretty much the right position anyway, so it's not like you're wandering off, so you don't have to pay attention as much. I don't know, just get into a rhythm and do it. All right, I'm going to do it. All right, a couple of chainsaw safety tips. Make sure you're alert when you're chainsawing, like doing anything like this, you gotta be alert. If you start getting too worn out that you can't pay attention, that's the time to stop. The other thing specific to chainsaws is whenever I move my feet, I stop the chainsaw. So as I'm walking backwards, I'll do my cut and I'll stop the chainsaw for a second, then move my feet once I'm planted. I mean it only takes like half a second, then I can start cutting again, you know? But always make sure when your chain is moving, your feet are on solid ground. Although definitely don't take this as a chainsaw safety video, like do the chainsaw safety stuff you're supposed to do. Yeah. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. Hey, it's gone. And here's all my boards from that half, right here looking good. Same thing. Great. What do you think, dog?


suspense and the producer of radio's outstanding theatre of thrills the master of mystery and adventure William M. Rogson. One of the criteria of a good story is that the characters change for better or worse during its telling. We submit the following as an example with the pious hope that its moral may reach the heart of any who needs it. Listen listen then as Miss Kathy Lewis stars in the bridge which begins in just a minute. Another visit with Joe and Daphne Forsythe. Joe honey. Hi Daphne where you been? Out. Do you love me? Sure I love you a lot. A whole lot? Alright what did you buy? Well. Come on you never start a conversation like that unless it involves money. I bought a hat.  It was a real bargain. How much? Seven dollars. Well that's not too much it could have been worse. Sweetheart. Oh no what else? Well when I bought the hat I needed shoes and a handbag to go with it didn't I? Uh huh. And I found just the right one. How much? Twenty one fifty and that's for both of them. Twenty one fifty and seven dollars more for a hat? That's some bargain that hat. I'm sorry. Well we're lucky we got the payroll savings plan. A bond every payday is one way to make sure we save something. Gee honey you're smart to invest in them. They pay your four dollars for every three. And it's a good thing for us they do. Can you ever forgive me? I guess. Oh you're so sweet. Why ain't you so sweet to me?  Come here you. Oh ciao. And now the bridge starring Miss Cathy Lewis. A tale well calculated to keep you in suspense. Saturday nights in West Chester. The party is at George and Laura's tonight. But it's the same party as it was last Saturday at the Kincaid and the Saturday before it's Millie and John. Same people doing the same thing. The husbands haven't seen each other since they came up from New York last night on the 505. And they may not have another reunion until the 849 picks them up at Chappacoa Monday morning. The wives have been adjourned since yesterday's PTA meeting will not reconvene until the community theater luncheon at the country club day after tomorrow. The kids are presumably asleep in a score of homes watched over by a TV watching babysitter with or without date. Saturday nights in West Chester. Togetherness in West Chester. Hey Liz what are you doing over here in the corner all by your little self. Thank you. Never heard of such a thing how about a fresh drink. No thanks. Come on Liz live a little. I'm fine. Dance. That's about all the host can offer with a guest's husband in the room. I doubt if you'd notice. Who is she George. She. Who. That. Girl. Dancing with my husband. Oh aren't you being pretty possessive about old Max. She makes me feel possessive. Who is she. You met her when you got here. Don't be obtuse George. Answer my question. Well her name is Edith Elwood works for the competition Marlon advertising been there about three months. Funny Max has never mentioned why should he must be a hundred others like her on Madison Avenue that pretty. She married. Give it up that's why she's working. Oh George have you ever seen them together. You know. Bunch. What is this a third degree because you're eating. You know how it is we're always taking people to lunch it's part of the business. Thanks for telling me George for heaven's sake Liz I haven't said anything you said enough now look Liz don't you go getting any crazy idea where you're going out I need some fresh air but it's raining cats and dogs out there but differences in me I seem to be all wet. Stand close to me under this one. Like this. Like this. Oh I adore the rain. Was raining the day we met. In front of 485 you stepped off the curb practically up your knees that's because I was looking at you and said of where I was going. Poor boy. Now isn't that just like a woman I forgot not about it. Somebody else out here where. Speak up friend or phone. It's me Max.  It'd be all right if I were out here with someone else. I'd better go back and eat a wait a minute. Is your wife getting in your way Max. Now what kind of a remark is that I couldn't help overhearing. Oh that that was just. Party talk. Was it. I remember that cold I remember it very well. Almost turned in the moon. I forgot. What's the matter with you tonight. You've barely been civil to people all evening and now you're out here moping by yourself. I'm sorry Max. I've been thinking. Thinking what. Times you've called recently to say you have to work late. How long it's been since you've asked me to have lunch with you in town you know I've got two new accounts to worry about in addition to all beautiful. What. Who's beautiful. You call.  Now look Liz George drove it over here this evening I didn't you sure would like to drive her back wouldn't you. Well as a matter of fact she lives only a couple of miles from us and I. Did offer to give her a lift. Max. All right Liz I'll tell George he'll have to take her home. Anything to keep peace in the family. To you. I don't know what I'd have done if you hadn't given me a lift Max with this rain and all. No trouble at all eating. Max tells me you don't live very far from us. That's right I was very fortunate to find a house right on the river I should think an apartment in town would be more convenient to your work here but I just love to be outdoors and if I do say so myself I have a green thumb with roses Max is good with roses too I get stuck myself. Sorry please slow down a little I'm only doing thirty five it's too fast for this narrow twisty road in the rain and there's that bridge at the bottom of the hill is will you pipe down and let me do the driving or maybe you'd rather walk maybe I would I think you're a wonderful driver Max I didn't say he wasn't. You don't know this road like I do and neither of you know it as well as I do I get right down this hill with my eyes closed Max. In a moment we continue with the second act of suspense how can heroism be acknowledged and symbolized recognition of outstanding heroism takes the form of America's supreme military declaration the Medal of Honor it is awarded to those members of the United States armed forces who distinguish themselves conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life above and beyond the call of duty in action involving actual conflict with an enemy for recipients in the Army and Air Force the medal is a gold finished bronze star with the head of the ancient goddess Minerva in the center a laurel wreath in green enamel surrounds the five pointed star which is suspended by two links from a bar bearing the inscription Valor and surmounted by an eagle with wings outstretched the ribbon pad directly above is light blue with 13 white stars arranged in the form of a triple chevron the president of the United States is the only government official authorized to present the Medal of Honor the award is made by the commander in chief in the name of Congress thus accounting for why this highly esteemed decoration is sometimes incorrectly referred to as the congressional Medal of Honor only a very small number of the many millions of us armed forces personnel past and present have been presented this great symbol of courage to which free men can aspire the Medal of Honor and now sparring miss Kathy Lewis act two of the bridge we're still alive the river must be 40 feet down there and we're hanging right over it we're gonna fall any second we're gonna fall I'm sorry it's all my fault Liz why I haven't been driving like an idiot we're alive it's all that matters Max the headlights the dimming short problem there they go I've got to get out even stop but keep your hands off that door there's nothing under you but water there's a car coming across the bridge they'll see us we're hanging at least 10 feet below the floor of the bridge they couldn't have seen us even if our lights have been working there'll be another one come along we slipped a little but whatever we're caught on is still holding there's a flashlight in the glove compartment you're close to it either I don't know where to look so dark here I'll get it let me have it Liz I'll see if I can tell what's holding it nothing to hang on to out here I'll commit a button absolutely smooth try the other side even if you're closest to the window what's that on my hand it's like blood my nose is bleeding my nose I'm hurt it's broken I'm sure it's broken I'll be disfigured it's just a nose I take this light see if there's anything out your side we can hang on to out here I can't see anything what was that I couldn't know that I'm hurt I'm in shock I you just have a nosebleed I don't want to die I don't want to die hysterics aren't going to get us out of here whatever's holding us must be under the back wheels we better climb into the back seat and reduce the strength I'll go first not the heaviest all right you're next to you can't no I can't you'll pull out push no I'll give me your hand thank God at hell do you smell something I was hoping you wouldn't notice it gasoline yes the car tip at this angle of thanks we can't believe we catch fire we'll burn out if we're careful I'm getting out I've got to get out sit down let me go down around slug you back to what you started either hold please hold call it again we're all up even shut up in a moment we continue with the third act of suspense another visit with Joe and Daphne Forsythe yeah yeah I'm up I'm up I forget breakfast I'll shave it Joe it's not time to go to work then why'd you wake me up you were snoring you were snoring loud oh really I just wanted to quiet you I thought I was quiet you sounded like a buzz saw going through a pine nut pretty good pretty good I wish I could be with you at 2 30 in the morning you can go back to sleep now oh gee thanks you can get a good night's sleep to our savings bonds will protect us the money we invest is used to protect our country and its freedoms why all around us we can see the safeguards that our bonds are paid for how about that so you see when you buy that savings bond with every paycheck you're really investing in a secure night's sleep now then this house I'm not what good night Daphne good night Joe and now starring Miss Kathy Lewis act free of the bridge there comes another car when it's right above us let's try yelling all together as loud as we can so they didn't have to wait for the next place for the next time I do so am I I've never been so scared in my life well why don't you show it then we've got to face it those cars up there will never be able to hear us over the sound of their motors we've got to wait for one that's coming from the same direction we were every car that's passed has been coming from the opposite direction they can't see the hole in the God rail where we went through but a car coming down that hill the same way we were would pick it up in their headlights somebody's got to come along later let's hope it's sooner we'll be too late I have an idea couldn't we break open the back window and then we could climb out over the trunk break it with what here my shoe that safety glass eat it it's like a ball peen hammer to crack it out Max how is the window put in a metal strip all around it held with screws come out if you remove the screws probably but they take a special screwdriver and we have an any screwdriver I have a mail file in my purse mail file it might work on a Phillips screw I could tell better if I had a flashlight sorry Max I said I was sorry my cigarette lighter are you out of your mind you smell like gasoline for remember just trying to help the best way you can help us to stop having ideas can't help you can help it I don't hear you going into hysterics won't work Liz the file's too soft just bends at least it'll be like someone sure to find it's not too late what do you mean but girls there's no use kidding you every time the car goes over the bridge whatever's holding us gives a little maybe you didn't notice the last time was the worst but it will hold it's got to I wouldn't bank on it are you kids lean back as far in the car as you can do balance my weight what are you going to do I'm going to roll up the front windows why in case we go into the drink no no no these rear windows you get the one on your side now listen to me carefully I don't know how deep the water is underneath it but with these windows close we'll have a couple of minutes after we get to get our breath and our bearings if the water's shallow we may be above the surface and we'll have no problem if we're completely submerged we'll have to roll down the windows let the car fill up and then swim out no no no I can't I can't you can't watch I can't swim I can't swim I hear a car yeah this may be the one that shakes is loose sit tight now I don't feel the bridge shaking maybe he's coming down the hill the way we did he's stopping maybe roll down the way yes we're here eat it too you better hurry pal this car may let go any minute just a couple more feet eat it that's here give me your hand okay honey safe and sound how in the world did you ever come looking for your baby sitter got worried when you didn't get home she phoned me bless her are you all right yeah Liz and I are fine but you'd better get eat it to a hospital she's had a nose come on George please take me away from this awful place after this truck he's pounding to make the hill they always do coming across the bridge flash your light down there backs look deeper than I thought well pal looks like you just lost yourself an automobile I almost lost a lot more than that tonight huh George would you please take me home come on George you must keep your date waiting my day well you brought her to party didn't you it's only polite to see her home only do you mind dropping Liz and me first we're tired we want to get the bed don't we honey which Kathy Lewis starred in William and Robeson's production of the bridge written by Alan Botzer and Mr. Robeson supporting Kathy Lewis and the bridge were Virginia Greg Jerry Hausner and Bill Quinn listen listen again next week when we return with another tale well calculated to keep you in suspense


So, you know what re-energize me. The wife tax me in a cell phone. Hey, Eka, how are you? We just come back from the grave of my husband. Because the ceremony three days after died. We just come back. He said, Eka, I'm the one who lost someone who I only have. They have no children. So, you can understand what I'm feeling, Eka. But the next time he sees it to me. But Eka, go back to your hospital.  Go back to your patient. I know you are very frustrated. But go back. That is what she said. That is the only thing the old tax really, really make me alive again. That's true story. It's very hard job. But again, that re-energize me. Okey, I come back again. I kept with the challenging. So, that really happened with me. And I have never forget all my life like this. So, you can remember, the wife who lost her husband re-energize me. To come back again to my dangerous job.


Welcome to my channel, I am Arpita Karwa and this is a video wherein I am going to give you a very simple blueprint on how you can complete people in environment which is one of the most important units of UGC net paper one. I am sure that all of you must be anxious because exam is coming nearby and you have not yet started people in environment. There is so much to study and you don't know what to study, what to concentrate on and what to leave. So this video is aimed for all those who have not yet started people in environment and who want to complete this monster like unit in less than an hour. In this video I am going to tell you the three most important sections on which you have to focus if you want to get good marks in the people in environment section. I am also at the end going to reveal three key portions which you have to skip altogether because from these three portions no questions are asked these days. So make sure you watch the video till the end so that you exactly know what to study and what not to study because I strongly believe in the idea that it is not about the hard work, it is about the smart work. You should always know how to work smartly so that you can get more marks in less amount of effort and time. So without wasting any more time let's jump right into the topic but before that if you want to stay updated with all these revision video series make sure you subscribe to my channel you can also follow me on all the social media platforms so that you get notified about my latest videos updates about UGC net examination. So let's start. If you look at the major important topics that are asked in UGC net exam from these section people in environment the topic which will be on the top of the list would be major pollutants and their sources. I was analysing the previous year paper and I was amazed to see that every year out of five two questions are asked from this section so you can very well imagine how important this section is and only by looking at these pollutants and their sources you can easily get those two questions right. So if you look at the important pollutants you will figure out that there are substances like carbon monoxide which is produced by the incomplete combustion of fuel that means when we are running vehicles or during this transportation of ours a lot of carbon monoxide is released in the air. Another important pollutant is methane which is produced during the production of coal. So agricultural practices is one of the major sources of methane. There are a lot of other pollutants like sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, particulate matter, ozone all these things you need to take care when you are jotting down the important pollutants for this particular unit. Make sure that you understand both the things. The question can be asked either of the ways either they can ask you that carbon monoxide is produced a maximum in which of these particular activities or they can ask you that vehicles or transportation leads to the production of which particular pollutant. So either way the question can be asked and if you are very sure about the answer then nobody can take those four important marks from you. So make sure that today itself just after watching this video you make a list of all the important pollutants and their major sources. Another important thing which is asked from people in environment unit is the per capita consumption or per capita emission. Now you will be surprised to know that at least one question is asked every year where we are given a list of countries and they ask us to put them in an order in which the country which is consuming a particular thing at the highest is at the top and the country which is producing a particular thing at the lowest is at the bottom of the list. For example, in December 2017 there was a question that rank these countries according to the per capita consumption of energy. On the other hand there was another question in July 2018 where they asked us to rank the countries according to the per capita water consumption and can you know the you know can you tell me the answers of these two questions. If you look at the per capita energy consumption then Russia is the country which is at the top. If you look at the per capita water consumption then it is USA. My question to you is that which country do you think tops the list of CO2 emission. If you know the answer put that in the comment section below and I love to see what you have to reply and how do you know if this question comes in the exam too. So google the answer if you don't know and make sure you feed it in your brain because this might turn up in the exam this year. Another interesting trend that I have seen in last two years is that a lot of questions they are asking about meteorological disasters which they were not asking before that. January 2017 then again in June 2018 I have seen them asking questions about world meteorological organization. There was another question in the paper where they asked us to tell which of the natural disasters listed is a part of hydro meteorological disaster and the correct answer was tsunami. Then they were also asking questions about meteorological hazards. So make sure that you study a bit about hydro meteorological disasters or meteorological disasters so that if they ask you a tricky question you can answer it this time in the exam. Now that we have looked at three most important topics which you must study for the unit people and environment you should also know what you don't need to study at all because these topics are the ones from which they are not asking any questions these days. It is very important to know what not to study even before knowing what to study why is that? Have you ever seen a person climbing up a mountain very quickly so that he can be on the top for the first time but then once he climbs to the top of the mountain he realizes that he has climbed a wrong mountain he wanted to climb another mountain but he did not see which mountain he is climbing and he just keep on going on and on and on and he regret his decision. The same thing happens with a lot of students we start reading so much about people in environment of some other topic and later we realize that whatever we have read that doesn't make any sense because that is not important from exam point of view.  The first important topic which you should not study at all are the definitions on environment and the definitions on the ecosystem for example they might give you definitions on atmosphere, lithosphere, who are producers, who are composers, who are decompositors. Now these questions are not asked from past four five years so I am assuming that the same trend would be followed and no more questions would be asked on these topics. So you can exclude it from your study pattern. Another important thing that they don't ask is population pyramid and food chain. I have seen a lot of UGC net books having this information if you are reading from any of these books make sure you skip this portion because they have never asked any question from population pyramid or from food chain. Another thing that you can skip very calmly and without any regret is the national reserves and the biological reserves in the national parks. So if you look at these list of biological reserves that are being given in the UGC net books you will feel horrified. You will feel as if you will never be able to learn all of them. But let me tell you there's a good news you don't have to learn any of them because they are not asking any questions on national parks or biological reserves. So you can keep that aside and only focus on the three topics that I have given. Also if you're very eager to study more you can study more about the natural disasters like earthquake, floods, tsunami, landslides because they are asking a few questions these days from these topics also. So with that note I would like to take your leave and try to give you a very simple blueprint following which you can easily in our or so complete the entire people in environment portion without feeling as if you have not touched it at all. So it's always good to do something rather than leaving the topic completely. So it's better that you just study these portions and if you're lucky enough all the five questions would be from what we discussed on even if you are not so lucky I'm telling you that at least three out of five questions would be from what we've discussed in this video. So with that note I would like to take your leave before that if you have not yet subscribed to the channel I think you have good reasons to do that. Also make sure that you follow me on all the social media platforms. If you want to look at the previous year papers of UGC net paper one or paper two solve previous year papers are available on my website link is in the description box below we'll meet very soon in the next video lecture till the time we meet next happy learning keep loving literature and stay tuned to


Just a moment. Lyndon Johnson. Oh yes. How are you? I hope I'm not interrupting your dinner or something. No, no. We finished some time ago. Gordon, we, I just learned tonight, our folks have been out looking at these libraries and is there no way in the world that we could reconstitute as nearly as possible in the president's office at the library, the president's office here. Well, we haven't thought of it, but it's possible. I hate to build me a little one out there inside and say, this is the way the president's office looked, and here's his desk, and here's his chair, here's his FDR picture, here's where all these people sat. Now that is the most attractive thing they tell me to the people who go in here. It is Truman discussing where he sat in this office. Yes. I've seen the one that's in Kansas, President Truman. Lady Bird said, well, we have a trouble. She said it just ought to be. We just should have thought of it.  And now we've got a bunch of can't do philosophy. She says that the ceiling is not high enough. Well, maybe we don't have to have the same height ceiling. But maybe, and maybe we can have the same over room. Maybe we've got different dimensions.  And we ought to say, we see relatively a few people come through the President's office here. But all of them want to see where the President worked. Just as much as they want to see where the President was born when they come to our little house. That's one of the basic things. And it's going to be remembered and impressive on them a lot more than some book up in a shelf. And if we could, that's the one thing I want. I'd like to have as near a reproduction as finances and architectural requirements would permit. I don't say it's got to be 18 feet high or 14 or it's got to be 38 feet long. We might have a little card on the door and say this is not an exact reproduction or something. But I'd like for it to be such and say where they get an impression that here's where the President worked. Because they all want to see that. They all want to, that's what they come to see. Well, Mr. President, we'll get the dimensions and we'll try to several locations, or maybe there's more than one and it would be nice if we could do it to do it exactly. Because I think the quality of that room is the total thing and it may be possible to do it. Well Truman, they tell me they've done a rather good job out there. Well that's the main thing in the whole place. There isn't much to see as the Truman Library accepts that. That's why sort of people orient towards it. Right off the lobby and as I recall it's pretty exact even to the height. It's a wing off of a low building so they could reproduce it exactly. In fact that's the whole feature of the whole Truman Library. So it was easy to do there and goodness me if that's what you'd like we'll make every effort. I'd rather have that than anything else about the building. I'd gather that all right and we'll see. I'm in there now. I'm in that office tonight and I come in sometimes at 6.30 in the morning and I'm here late and I would like for them to see just where we work. And I'd like to have the exact replica as near as possible. But I would accept anything that would be better than nothing. I think we'll try to make it exact and incidentally it's a beautiful room. It really is a beautiful room. So we ought to try to see if we can do it by going through a floor or something. That part I see thrills. Just a question for this room and plan you know but we'll see what we can do. I see thrills come in here. Every person walks into it. I think it's a beautiful room and if you could work on that. How are they coming on it? Well they're pouring away. In fact the place that might go is just about we've had to catch it right now because there'll be pouring floors above that pretty soon. But it's not too late right now. Oh for God's sake. The only problem is if we have enough space the height I think we could work. But just a question whether we have enough space and plan to reproduce that oval. We'll take some space for somebody else. I know. Well we'll see what we can do. You do it. Thank you. I know you can. And when we're going to open it. Well I think the latest plans are really for opening is in June of 70. It'll be done earlier in that construction but then you'd have to put all the exhibits in. And I think the max and I think the safe date for sort of an official opening would be around June of 1970. I thought I was going to make it anyway. That's what I heard. The contractor is going along. And it's hoped that he might be done in January, February, March. But it's going to take a little time to move in. Get all the exhibits arranged. Are you generally happy with it? Well the best thing about this president is that the contractor is very good. And he's doing a very good job. And everybody we're all very happy with the quality of the job so far. And that's of course very important. Now what about our exhibits? Well Mrs. Johnson's been working with Arthur Drexler and I think the whole thing is coming along fine. I think the general design as far as I know of it looks very good to me. Of course if we can get this oval in where I have in mind your office. I don't know if we have enough room but if we can then everybody would be happy. You just get it. Make it smaller. I'm sure we'll get it. Thank you Arthur. Thank you. Waiting. Waiting.


Now there is a practical question again because it needs practice how to work out a cash flow statement. And in fact this is one of the difficult statement we find to prepare. I used to suggest to students that there should be a working paper and use that working paper, opening, closing, differences and then reconcile those differences and see whether there is inflow or outflow. But anyhow, so these are again two years balance sheets. Let me just give you a share capital paid up. Then we have general reserve, then we have retained earnings and this is part of equity. The total equity comes through and then we have non-current liabilities debentures. Debentures are loaned and then we have trade payables, we have provision for taxes and total liabilities and equity. So total liabilities and equity is equal to total assets. Now net current liability, non-current liabilities are there, property, plant and current assets are there and property, plant, accumulated depreciation and we have intangible assets. So this is another assets which is non-current, intangible. Intangible which don't have the physical substance like goodwill is the good name of a business. The patent copyrights is the simple rights so they don't have but still we pay for it and if we pay for it, it's an outflow. And if we amortize it, if we reduce it it means we are not getting any money out of it but we are charging that loss to the profit and loss account as a depreciation as an amortization. So adjustment is in the profit and loss. Then current assets inventory, we got prepaid expense, we got short term investments. Now these short term investments is a part of cash and cash equivalent. If they are short term, if they are long term, then they are the investment activity. But if they are short term then we have trade receivables, then we have cash and bank balance. Now look here in the cash and bank balance, you have opening 4500 and now you got closing 3200 which mean that in the whole year there is a drop in cash by 800 and these figures are in 1000s actually. Then total again balance sheet equals. Now they haven't given you the full statement of income. They have just given you the comprehensive statement of income and there is operating profit given separately. Then we have financial charges and then we have before tax and then we have less tax and we got the profit after tax and that will be added to the retained earning in the balance sheet. Now figure of 46,350 is operating profit and clearly it is before interest in tax. So we start from here to prepare the statements. Now the additional information regarding this income statement and balance sheet. A plant originally cost 20 million having a book value of 6 million and that 6 million is after taking out a 14 million depreciation on this particular plant which you have sold for 9.8 million. State away 9.8 million is your cash inflow and so far profit of 3.8 million is concerned. It is taken to profit and loss account. So we need to remove it from the profit and loss account. Because we are taking the whole amount as a inflow in the investing activity. Depreciation expenses and amortization again we have given the operating profit. It means they have already taken care of this depreciation and amortization. So we have to add back those two figures. No change in the value of short of investment. So it is a part of cash and cash equivalent. So it will be adjusted towards the end of the cash flow statement. Now a dividend of 8 million were declared and paid by the company during the year. It clearly given that we have paid. So it is an outflow and that outflow will be reported as a financing activity because it is paid to the shareholders. Now if there is a dividend received. Let's say if you invested somewhere and you got a dividend income. Now that income will be if you receive will be reported normally in the operating activity. But alternatively it can be reported in the investing activities because it is out of the investing activities. Thank you very much.