Okay, this is the pre-Inaugural 2017 show, the pre-U.S. Presidential Inaugural, Heaven Help Us All, I call it the Doomsday Inaugural. We already have a Doomsday Cabinet selected. So, so, so, so. Here we are. I don't have to tell you any details about the show because you already read it in the intro. So, why be redundant? Yes. It is snowing today in northeastern New Jersey. How many inches do they anticipate? They say two to three for us. All right.  Well, I don't use a car brush. I use a kitchen broom, the older kitchen broom. It's quicker. A few wipers. I'm gentle around them. Okay. All right. But it's a lot faster for pushing and brushing. Pushing the snow off. But anyway, so, my lower back feels better. It just went out of whack for no logical reason. I was sitting in a car. I went, I went, I attempted to get out of the car and it went on me. It feels, the pain and spasming goes away when I lie down or stand. But if I sit in a more of a jackknife position like I'm feeling now, unless I have a cushion behind me, it depends on how I'm sitting and it comes back. I never get hurt or feel discomfort or pain while exercising. Now, of course, I haven't been exercising several days because of this. It's like a sciatic, but sciatic is more excruciating. But it goes down the leg. Yeah. It goes down your leg is right. It's bad.  He says it is. He says it is. They'll pay us back after we build it. Chances are my predictions, my intuition says that the middle class will get screwed into paying for this ridiculous wall. Of course, the middle class will get, will get stuck with the bill because the rich should never get stuck with the bill in the United States. You think his rich buddies and him and Trump is going to pay for anything unnecessary that won't work like this wall? No, the middle class will get stiff. As always, so you know, to rehash our past few shows, Donald Trump's victory speech and campaign promises are totally the opposite of his cabinet selections, totally the opposite. So don't hold your breath for Make America Great again. Maybe there's a disclaimer in microscopic words that says, for the wealthy, Make America Sick again. Well, they're already rich, but you know, for some reason, the top 1%, the wealthiest people on earth always seem to be these greedy old geezers with one foot on a banana peel and one foot in a grave, and they still don't have enough money, amazing, simply amazing. They all have one thing in common, they don't have enough. Well, I just want to show you some of the coupons that come in. I get an envelope with coupons, you know, some of them from pizzerias, some of them from restaurants, buffets, Chinese takeouts, people who do roofing, people who do tiles, you know. But I get a couple of these.  Donate your car. Look, it's a fundraiser. Well, let me tell you something. The government should be taking care of our veterans, not having these poor people that put their bodies and lives on the line for war profiteering, racketeers, you know, they should be taken care of by our system, not by relying on donations, okay. After what they've been through and when they return to the United States, when they return home, they should not have to rely on fundraisers, which most likely have a president or CEO sucking up most of the fundraising money, all right. Our system is despicable. They should be taking care of our vets, all right.  I mean, anything, any money they can raise as long as they're giving most of it to the vets, I'm all for. But people in a country like this, people that are poor, whether they be veterans or not, should not be in that homeless situation in this type of country. You know what I mean? Not with the unfair distribution of wealth that occurs. Well, hey, if we give it to the vets, we can't give it to the military. We can't give it to the corporations and the rich or tax cuts and et cetera. It's all a matter of distribution. Oh, you're talking about the bogus job creators? Yeah.  That's it, period. The money, even if all the jobs were in the United States, even if they were, the money will pool at the top. That's what it's meant to do. It's not, and you know what it's like? It's having a big wine glass, and right before the wine overflows, they just replace it with a larger wine glass, and then a larger wine glass. So nothing trickles or drips downward. All right, lucky seven bells for our show. We need all the luck we can get this January, beginning of January. I guess the inauguration is Monday, right? Friday, 20. Oh, it's the 20th. Mr. Obama is going to get his last speech, I believe, this week on Tuesday. It would have been nice if his last project was to get a real liberal Supreme Court justice in there. Well, he's not got a liberal one in there, but he's got a diesel one in there, but they're blocking him. The same as they've been doing now for his eight years.  Well, they've been doing a good job at that. Well, they've always done that. They vote. They want to steal your social security and Medicare. That doesn't belong to them, but this is the thing. Everything they do, the Republicans, is anti-poor and anti-middle class.  Keep on re-electing these incumbents, electing and re-electing them. They looked at the four counties in Kentucky for on Obamacare, and etc., and voted for Trump. They said, don't touch my Obamacare. Don't touch my Obamacare. Don't touch my social services, but we're going to vote Republican. Very interesting. That is a very interesting point, Rev. Dr. William J. Eisenman. Let us contemplate a little bit on that. You fall asleep. Let us contemplate. We should contemplate contemplation, actually. No, I mean, it's like—it doesn't make sense. That's great. As old man Leonard Nemoy used to say, it is very illogical. You are—you know that the left wing, the progressives, are responsible for your social services in its entirety, including the invention of social security. Whatever food stamps you get, Obamacare, it's all coming from the left, from progressives. But you consistently vote right wing. Now, let us analyze this.  In a lot of instances, it's because they don't understand what I just said before. They'll vote for Trump, but they'll say, don't touch my Obamacare. But that's like— It's the opposite, you know, party that gave them Obamacare. Yeah, that's right, yeah. I just echoed. So some of them don't know. If you go and make—they've done their studies— They don't understand it. There is no understanding of it. They did do studies. They go in the street and they ask people, do you like the Affordable Care Act? That'd be most people like it. Because it sounds— When they say, do you like Obamacare, they say no. Because the word— It's the same thing. Because the word Obama is in there. Exactly. Because them, our people, associate Obama with the black man in the White House. Yeah, that's correct. So if you're talking to somebody from down south, instinctively they're going to go, Obamacare. I don't want nothing of that guy. I think he would medicare and medicate, because if they're on it and everything, and they'll say, don't touch my medicare. But the goddamn Republicans aren't going to do that. Well, they're going to—they're not going to borrow it, they're going to steal it. They're going to destroy it. It's—even though you paid into it. They want—look, these people— What they really want. These people are rich. These Republican senators and congressmen and right-wing Supreme Court justices, they're pretty financially independent. So they have theirs.   Now, they take bribes.  They are a horse for the corporations. So they're not—they're not feeling any remorse by stealing your social security. No, and they keep raising their income don't they? Hey, even if they weren't wealthy, 175,000 a year, not counting perks, I think you can pay for your own individual retirement account, your own health insurance. Listen, if my brother-in-law has to pay $500 a month as a business owner for a moderate—moderate, not the worst, not the best—a moderate, decent health insurance, I'm sure that these people in Washington can afford a upper-tier health insurance and an individual retirement account next day, they can put money away. Come on, 175,000 a month. Why should they care about that if you and the government are going to pay for them? Because we the people do not hold anyone's feet to the fire. Nobody is held accountable for anything. It's like the more infamous you are, the more you succeed in today's America. As Republicans, they win again. Once they lose as a crook or an ethics person, look at Newt Gingrich for Christ's sake. Nor the Oliver North. Point next there, he can go on and on and on.   What did he put in charge of the environment, some ExxonMobil? Wait a minute, Tillerson's going to be Secretary of State. Sessions is going to be a date. Yeah, the Attorney General. The whole cabinet is pro-corporate right-way. That's correct. And he's supposed to make America great again, but not for the poor middle class. It's not going to happen. Hey, we're going to have a first lady that has lots of new photographs that anybody can look at.  Not this one. Why did that stuff hurt anybody this time around? Times have changed. Billy Bush on the bus didn't hurt him at all. And that stuff would hurt him at all. None of it hurt him. Everything he did was against what should have been done. But people were captivated by his speeches at the rallies. He tapped into... Ah, excuse me. Of course my legs, I tends to feel better. My back. He tapped into inner feelings of these people at the rallies that really... They really scratched them where they had stopped. They really dug what he was saying. And he probably knew it too. He gave them the idea that he was an outsider and he was going to change things. Same thing Obama did. But they liked his aggressiveness towards them people. Those people. Them people. It's always pointing the blame towards people that do not deserve the blame because they are not too blame. Look it over there. Look it over there. Big distraction. By the way speaking of Snap and things like that. They're looking into food stamp, EBT, being able to buy from like Fresh Direct. Which is like a grocery store where you can buy stuff and it's delivered to you online. You can order online your food. Isn't that company kind of pricey? I have no idea about it. Fresh Direct, is that... I noticed a company, Blue Apron. Blue Apron, Luvo, there's a whole bunch of them. But the point I'm trying to make is that they are trying to make it so you... You can buy online. They don't have to go to the brick and mortar store. Well, buying online, buying online every year is growing by leaps and bounds. Buying online is gradually taking the place of stores. I'm sure DHL, FedEx and UPS and... Oh, Amazon is the other one. Fresh Direct and Amazon. And the Postal Service. I bet all the parcel delivery companies are statically... You're gonna love it? Are statically hysterically... No, that's not the right word. Statically happy.  That purchasing is going from the retail store to online buying. Probably the people who make dry ice and ice packs. I bet they're happy too. Yeah, they will be healthy. You know what I mean? Things of that nature. Things will change. And what will be easier for the people on the stand? Yeah, and this is not... These meals, because my mother gets food delivered. She gets... And I forgot what it was. One or two. She gets two weeks worth of grub of vitals. Ah, frozen stuff. No, actually no. Well, you can't eat two weeks of food one day. On the contrary, it comes delivered... It comes delivered refrigerated, but not frozen. It comes delivered fresh, and then I, in turn, freeze it after I rotate the stock.  I put the older meals in the front, and I put the newer meals in the back. But what I'm saying is it's not like Swanson Hungry Man dinners or Encore Marie Calendar, they're decently prepared meals that you would get in a good cafeteria. They're decent food. It's decent food. You get a menu. You choose from the menu. It just so happens that her health insurance company, Wellcare, I think it's called, pays for it 100% for my mom. But there are other companies now doing it. Now, between that, between Amazon and eBay and the Google Shopping and this company and that company, everything is becoming online shopping and companies are offering free shipping and handling. A lot of companies are offering free shipping and handling, as well as the lowest price you can find, which means, forget about mom and pop retail stores. They're going to be a dinosaur of the past, because you're not going to save any money at a mom and pop retail store. Their prices are through the roof. But then again, their leasing cost is to have a store or probably through the roof. Their rent is probably through the roof. So, you know, forget about them. Now, you've got the corporate chains. They are encouraging online shopping and as a rule, the first products that get shipped out by truck are the online purchases first and then the stores secondarily get the stock. I must say, I deal with a company called Chewy for my cat food and things of that nature. Cat food for the cats, right? And lately, Chewy has been delivering next day. It's incredible. Absolutely. They must have a warehouse not too far in Northeast somewhere. I have no idea. That's another thing. These companies have more than one warehouse. So, if the company is based, like for instance, If it's next door. I order from a company to save money. I order from Swanson Vitamins. They're in Fargo, North Dakota. But the warehouse that my order comes out of is in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. I'm in New Jersey. That's why I get it in a timely fashion. And this is what is going on with these companies. They have multiple warehouses in different regions. You don't have to wait that long for your product and the shipping costs are lower and lower in a lot of cases. They're free if you have a certain minimum order. They're free. And this is, listen, everything possible that they can come up with is going through the personal computer, tablet, or laptop. All through the computer. Some days soon, I know they have the technology already. You don't even need a password. They have something that can read the iris of your eye right through the monitor, which is second to DNA. Because you've got to be careful who you're dealing with nowadays. You know what? You can't fake DNA though. The iris is almost as good as DNA. You know what I mean? Because everybody's guilty nowadays until proven innocent. Everybody's, hey, there's a lot of scamming out there. And they're slick. They're very slick. They're very slick. Now, I don't know how true this is, but a former classmate of mine sent me this information that the blood-sucking, greedy, a big-nosed geek, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook wants to start charging people for their posts. Certain people. Certain, not everybody.  Why would he charge you? He makes money off his ads, doesn't he? Yes. And all the spamming that you get hit with, all the ads. Yeah. Yeah, why he doesn't have enough money. Now, I don't know how true that is. A friend of mine says, no, this would be all over the news if this was true. Nobody would make a post. Nobody would. Hey. You know what people concurred with me? I go to Twitter. I hang out. I would say, you know what? I have two Facebook pages. I have five Facebook groups. You think I'm going to pay you for my uploads and my posts?  I go to Twitter and just sacrifice the Facebook before I pay him anything. Sure. I know when I upload something on my page, he nags me to pay five dollars to boost my visibility of my posts. Oh, yeah. Yeah, right. Oh, yeah. I'm going to pay. No, I ignore it.   And you got to kind of finagle, you know, it's hard to get rid of. You know, they're getting more obnoxious sales in the United States. More high pressure. So, but it's no way. When he bills me, I'll say, you know what? Terminate my account. I'm not paying you one penny. One penny to that guy. So anyway, I'm just going to show you when we take a break, you'll see the message I got. Maybe it's true. If it is, bye-bye Facebook.  I don't know. I don't know. But I'll post it anyway. I just want to say greetings to my top administrator from Uncensored Hard-Hitting Truth, Mr. Sash, Boyle, and this week, this show, this very show, when we go on break, you will be hearing the debut of the sensible sage Sash Boyle from San Francisco, California. He will be making his debut with his very first video for our show, Progressive Discussions. You will hear Sash Boyle. So move over, Debbie, from the same Progressives. Move over, chubby, no-neck, St. Yooker, of the young Toyx, and that little chatterbox, Yorkshire Terrier, that girl that hangs out with you.  Oh, she's too much, man. And you know what? Debbie from the same Progressives is like Jill Stein. She only seems to reply to women. She must be one of them dar feminists. She doesn't reply to men or me. But anyway, she only has a female outlook, focus. Yeah, but you know what? It's like, you can be in a not an organization, in a field, a profession. And in that profession, like working in a company, you can have coworkers, you can have ambassadors that are very good at what they do and are very knowledgeable. But that doesn't mean you have to get along with, that doesn't mean you have to be friends, you know, or you have to like each other. You can even hate one another. But you can still function together as ambassadors to the profession. Hey, look at Hollywood. I read a whole list of over 30 couples, I mean, 30 actors and actresses that hated their co-star in a movie or a TV show. As soon as the cameras off, they didn't really talk to each other. But they worked together. So you can not like one another, but you can still respect each other as an ambassador to the field. Now, the field of natural health, holistic health and nutrition and physical fitness and exercise. There are lots of quirky, eccentric people. There are lots of egomaniacs.   You know, there are some people I literally want to punch out but I respect them for being great ambassadors to the field to the profession and we all need a team. We need these ambassadors. We need a Debbie of the same progressives. We need a Michael Moore and though I'm not sure if you support Hillary or not, some say it's a lie, whatever, or sank. You did support Hillary? Why this sash says no, don't believe it. Wait a minute, you know what? I'm going to make a statement. I'm really anybody who supports Hillary Clinton or might be a closet neoliberal.   Make up your mind, everybody. This is my message across the board. I don't like sneaks.  I don't like sneaky people. Now, Michael Moore, either Michael Moore and Doris Hillary Clinton or he didn't. As did Bernie. Bernie, Bernie capitulated. You either had Trump or you had... Bernie could have brought the legions to Jill Stein. That didn't happen. Was I 100% happy with Jill Stein? No. I thought her rallies reminded me of Woodstock. They were too hipster. I don't know who this vice presidential, the black guy Baracko was. I didn't like his last name. It sounded too much like Barack Obama. I didn't really know anything about him. America didn't know anything about him. She constantly had a saccharine sweet smile when Nicaria was on. Dr. Jill Stein never stopped smiling. That bothered me. Again, she was very hipster. Everybody was like Woodstock if you ever see her rallies. Come on man, look what a profession. Was I happy about any of the candidates for 2016? I was only happy with Bernie until he just simply gave up the grassroots revolution. Him and Jeff Weaver decided to endorse Hillary Clinton. No third progressive party being created. No independent run and no joining of the Green Party. He was flat out after the nomination. He said, I endorse Hillary Clinton. That was a huge disappointment to us, Bernie Bros. and Bernie Krets. That was basically the only choice if you want to win. She was the only one who could look in. You're missing the point. Look at the numbers Bernie Sanders had. They would have flocked to the Green Party. You're not following me. I really don't understand what you're saying. After Bernie lost his only choice for numbers was the Democrat. I know that, but I'm trying to explain something to you. I don't understand what you're saying. You know why I don't understand what you're saying? Because his legions would have followed him to the Green Party. Of course they were. They love Bernie. It was a chance to take. The Democrats already had the numbers. The Green Party's numbers would have had it been made. So here we go again. Corporatism, the slicer of the two of you. Capitalism, corporatism, blah, blah, blah, blah. Hillary was not for free college education. She was not for universal healthcare. But we have to settle for Clinton because you people and your two-party system you're just as bad as evangelicals and your role versus way to abortion issue. You people are too into the Democrat forget about the FDR Democrats and the JFK Democrats.  It's gone. But you and others I recognize that right now. You and others want to save it. Who? You. Bernie. Santas. Other people want to save the Democratic Party. The DNC. It's the only thing that has the numbers. Number one. But that doesn't mean you want to save it. I mean, Ellison would probably make a great VP choice in the Green Party or in the Third Party. What's wrong with the Third Party? Well, he's running for something in the Democratic Party. Well, now Schumer wants is promoting is endorsing Ellison to head the DNC. Bernie's got Chuck Schumer on the same page with him which I'm kind of shocked but good, great. Well, Bernie works with the Democrats. Well, the Chuck Schumer who else is he going to work with? He competes with them. Chuck Schumer is the head of the Senate Minority, right? That's correct. Or the Senate Democratic Democrats. Right. Okay, let us now sink our teeth into these readings for this pre 2017 New Year, January pre-endoral show. Because the next show you'll see will be the post-endoral show. Now, the Trumpan Z's will be in charge. Well, there's also a lot of arguing going on about the Russians and I watched that entire interview between Sean Hannity and Julian Assange of WikiLeaks when Sean Hannity went to London, England to interview him and it was great and Julian Assange I didn't know he was a computer by trade. He's a computer security specialist and I listened to Julian Assange he's got quite a head on his shoulders and I believe and Sean Hannity believes and it was really important for someone to go over there and interview Julian Assange of WikiLeaks so let me based on the interview let me salute and dedicate this week's show to Julian Assange of WikiLeaks but there are people who I feel are closet Hillary supporters that want to blame the Russians for hacking and want to side with the CIA and the Obama administration and blame the Russians. Well, not only the CIA all 17 intelligence agencies say you believe your government the Russians. I don't there are the people in charge listen, if I'm working for a company and my CEO is an asshole you think I'm going to like suddenly like say that I like the guy I mean, you know, it's like I know they're in charge so you have to accept their stuff too and Julian and then you got to go look for the truth when there are two competing uh Washington College, yes if they both can't be truth so the problem is how do you find out when you got two big horns, horn sheep ramming their heads together and one is white and the other one is brown you got to like it's pretty hard to take a side well, you're not supposed to take a side until you find out which one is and that is where the independent critical free thinker with an open mind comes in and me and Saash we had a discussion and it was a perfect sample on how to discuss and debate like civilized people uh how two critical free thinkers would discuss subject you got to keep an open mind all right go ahead oh I'm sorry the writer paperback writer asks a great question regarding those who are criticizing president elect Donald Trump that war man before he has even taken the oath of office the war has lots of LED lights on what do they hope to gain by their negativity you know people today if you hit a raw nerve and you criticize them and you have a basis for what you say they always call you a hater where they call you a toxic negative negativity but it's okay for them to bitch your mom remember when Gary no pull that on me fair minded people who love our country and respect the office of president of the United States should give that a good deal of fun but in fairness this is also true Trump deserves exactly the same respect that he gave president Obama no more no less well when he went to visit when he went to visit president Obama he was very nice to him during the campaign and for five years about the MERS certificate come on the only time I think he was actually nice to him was when he visited the white house I think but then again I watched that video with Sheriff Arpaio and the lawyers let me tell you something they have quite a case against Obama Obama's birth certificate I have to there's no case whatsoever what the video show do you not know and listen to what we've said in the last few weeks did you see the duplicate no you don't have to look at that at all similarity analysis you don't have to look at that at all I've told you at the same time the man was born in the hospital when the birth certificate was issued there was a newspaper article of his birth back that up a real newspaper article that is correct so all these handwriting analysis forensic document from Italy and Sheriff Arpaio got all these experts garbage you could take a pile birth certificate and do the same thing so you think that these people in Arizona are just that relentless exactly what are you kidding me the right wing has been relentless since the 90's against Hillary and Billy Boy well they got white water the inside the White House with the travel gate but then they get their way with Newt Gingrich poisoning Bill Clinton's mind about getting rid of Glass-Steagall and Newt Gingrich well you are out of it my pa no I mean Larry Summers and the other jerk off Newt Gingrich was 1994 1992 actually I think he was in with 96 with the bullshit well very far when Rush Limbaugh was statically happy that the Republicans took control of Congress back then I remember him carrying on anyway fair is fair that's the American way have we forgotten Trump's ongoing strident promotion of the birther insult is it really fair to criticize the disgusting behavior of those who criticize Trump when in fact they are following his example well they're all corporates they're all corporates both major parties thank you I'm sorry they are I mean Bernie that's why we don't need another one if the elections were fair Bernie will be being sworn in office Bernie Sanders will be taking the oath next week January 20th if the elections were fair and square mind you there are still many numbskulls like the southern blacks and gay people to have this affinity attraction to Hillary Clinton they have this thing for Hillary Clinton maybe they don't like Bernie because he's a Jew from Brooklyn, New York he's a northerner and Bill is from Arkansas maybe it's a southern thing yes but the Democrats have since they changed from being Dixie Crats has always had the blacks helping them helping the blacks Democrat, the party itself Lyndon Johnson for Christ's sake with the civil rights laws I mean that's why the blacks in the south went for Hillary Bernie Sanders marching with Martin Luther King getting arrested for him that of course meant nothing no it didn't mean anything and the point of it is that when you they did not notice the changes in Billy and Hillary the corporate ass kissing changes which occurred since the 90s I feel your pain not just the changes in the Clintons but the changes in the party itself as a whole with the DNC and Deborah Washerman Schultz and the whole thing that happened from the beginning of the campaign 2016 campaign the whole transformation that I remember not 2016 I heard the term maybe two or three maybe a few years in the past about Blue Dog I never heard the word Blue Dog Democrat before that the Blue Dog Democrats oh you know when I first heard heard it heard it with Lieberman Dodd and who's the other guy I know Senator Dodd I know there were certain turncoats who voted right wing Lieberman and Dodd Lieberman was a god damn Manchurian candidate yeah Dodd was anti-universal single payer universal healthcare but he was for Dodd and Dodd Frank you know they were for reigning in Wall Street the Dodd Frank act so they were kind of like moderate Democrats they were corporatists in some ways of voting and then they were progressive in other ways yeah well 100% progressive is the only way to hold on being 100% progressive is the only way you're going to truly help the poor in the middle class not by being a moderate there you go is that what they mean by centrist the word centrist is like saying I'm a moderate I vote the center where I won't get hurt while you're riding the fence you don't want to make waves in other words you're a fucking sycophant you're a political sycophant whoever's in charge I will sick as fuck it's like when somebody a team wins the world series all of a sudden you see local people buying the cap of the winner of the world series they get along wait they go along to get along people like to be associated with a winner all the politicians and stuff they always like to be around a winner yeah I'm not a bronco fan but as soon as as soon as they won all these people Denver you know I rooted for Denver because I like Peyton Manning and I knew he was retiring and I wanted to see him get one more Super Bowl ring I like the Manning family and for him I did it for him not that I like Denver but what I'm saying you get the message sycophants they just they go with the winner they're like chameleons like a politician if he's in front of working class people he or she sounds progressive if they're in front of corporate CEO's they sound like a scumbag but they do it behind closed doors oh like Goldman Sachs speeches like Goldman Sachs speeches because they can't do it out in public it would ruin their image you see yeah that's what the late great jack the lains is I can't die it'll ruin my image well there he died but he died he died of an infection like a respiratory infection I'm surprised he used to take a truckload of pills I got it it is outrageous the way president Barack Obama U.S. Senator Charles Schumer Representative Nancy Pelosi and the media are reacting to Donald Trump's election appointments and leadership what about the goose neck Elizabeth Warren the fake Native American I wasn't a supporter of Trump during the prime but once he became the nominee he had my support and I must say since he won the election his work ethic selection process and leadership skill have impressed me greatly I think he's only taken Christmas and Thanksgiving off since his election and the quality of his appointments is unprecedented he has attracted some of America's greatest achievers and leaders his daily use of Twitter to bypass the media and to go directly to contact with the American people is highly affected on the other hand the behavior of Bill Clinton Hillary Clinton and the media is disgusting what do they think they are accomplishing by all their negativity they not only do not want to work with Trump toxic negativity they are actually trying to undermine his effectiveness that's how Pollyanna saw everything toxic negativity you're a hater you're a hater if the these leftists have their way they will destroy the American way as they have tried to do during the eight years of Obama we'll make sure that the American way is the best way I hope you would join me in supporting Trump as he becomes president of our great nation there we go this guy sounds like a flag waiver let's give our full support in his pledge to make America great again I wish I had whiskey in this tea make America great again their pledge America okay you're Kate Smith singing God bless America I read the editorial with shock and dismay you are explicitly crediting the president elects comment as the reason the attempt to gut ethics oversight in the Congress failed in fact it was the torrent of news articles Monday evening and Tuesday morning that brought the Republicans attack on the office to the attention of the public leading many to call email or write their representatives in protest they had far more to do with it than Trump I don't understand why you would avoid taking credit for your role in forking this disgusting bid to weaken ethical oversight Donald Trump's tweets didn't oppose gutting the office of congressional ethics instead he criticized the timing of the proposal your editorial did a disservice to all the organizations and individuals who voiced objections on ethical and constitutional ground what I understand Donald Trump spends a lot of time on Twitter more time on Twitter than he does preparing for the most important job in the world into the wee hours of the night what I hear in about two weeks a man who lost the national popular vote by more than 2.8 million votes will be inaugurated as the 45th president of the United States because of an outdated system the country holds on to call the electoral column with more than 38 million citizens gets 55 votes in the college Wyoming with 582,000 people gets 3 votes that gives the citizens of Wyoming an out of balance proportional advantage by about 358 percent per person so much for one person one vote I have a solution Hillary Clinton won in California by more than 3.4 million votes oh she did she did that's a fact she won the popular vote you look happy about that I am happy about someone else winning the popular vote over Trump it didn't have to be Hillary but it was you must learn to accept facts as they are unfortunately we have the same crappy capitalism let's put it this way we don't have democratic socialism you're forgetting one thing like skin to nape you're forgetting one important thing when you discuss right and left wing the crumbs the crumbs oh you mean like my grandfather said a few crumbs is better than nothing so they are not the same they are not two sides of a coin so if we had the ideal that's another matter and the oligarch didn't interfere and the American people were not suckers then we would get a whole loaf of bread a whole grain bread like Scandinavians get instead of a handful of crumbs because we have the votes to get anything we want in the congress and the senate oh yeah you mean we the people yeah we have the numbers but this electoral college shit that's a problem continue I have a solution Hillary Clinton won in California by 3.4 million votes she lost in Pennsylvania Michigan and Wisconsin by about 103,000 votes combined my solution is for Democrats to relocate voters from California to Pennsylvania Michigan and Wisconsin as needed in time to establish residency for the 2020 election is this a serious proposal no but it does illustrate the absurdity of the system we use to select a president of all Americans that's right right on I want to salute my friend from Facebook of New England great new englander Mr. Dan Dudley Mr. Dan Dudley I salute you with my lucky Blackthorne Shalely weapons grade out to Dan Dudley we had a very invigorating chat last night he's like he's a truth seeker yay he's not a right winger he's not a neoliberal hipster jackass he's a truth seeker like myself and he tells it like it is what? a truth seeker by both sides well you have to you have to determine what are the facts before you well of course you can't say like for instance some people are farther to the left than myself and Dan Dudley some people believe in giving special treatment to groups of people that are lobbying and we don't and that's that there are differences you don't have to kill each other over but I look at it this way if I don't have equal opportunity to get benefits myself I don't give a fuck about any lobbying group fuck them if James P. Madonna is not filling up his belly with the finest food and filling my freaking wallet up I ain't giving to any lobbying group fuck you go ahead that's only me well our government is already skewed in that area skewed in giving cow talent I'm talking about to all those who already have I'm talking about lobbying no no of course the rich don't deserve a red cent I'm talking about lobbying groups we're special we're more important than there are all those other people you know like let's say the gay is a lobbying and the lesbians lobbying I'm talking about the money the minorities lobbying who cares about those lobbies I'm talking about where money goes oh you're talking about the money going to the top like what Bernie Sanders says disproportionate disproportionate of the of the wealth in America right a tax tax system yes you know it's like it's like with the jobs I mean okay you're outsourcing all the jobs and the company the corporation is not paying taxes and then they bring the products back from China and they don't pay tariff on it so they're getting off scot free okay now they're super super wealthy and successful and now they got poor America poor downtrodden America without a pot to piss in and they expect them to buy their products interesting how that works they're on their side they don't have that long term political view of reality you gotta cause they are issuing personality personal stuff and that's what I'm saying when you're dealing with money you do not deal with personal likes and dislikes you follow the money trail right and where it leads you open your big flap and mouth you know if your business is to manufacture a product you need customers you gotta have people to buy them now if people don't have surplus cash anymore because the middle class is shrinking and the poor is growing and the poor have no surplus cash then guess what all the all the things that people really don't need all the luxury items jewelry picnic table in the backyard or whatever all those industries stop selling and it goes down to it goes all the way down to bare necessities like food home heating things like that shelter I hated that song how disturbing close on the back roof over the head food on the table to read an editorial that maintains a one to one cause and effect relationship that has zero proof this particular oddly tempered tweet came toward the end of an unsavory attempt by house republicans to gut the independent ethics watchdog panel oh at the point of president elect donald trump's tweet it had already become clear that many people had spoken up against putting ethics on a back burner there was no mention of this in the editorial well this may seem like a small point to some it's my strongly held believe that our free press must never be intimidated or be reluctant to tell the whole story in this age of demonizing journalists and first amendment rights while tweets are ostensibly part of that right a president of the united states must never be allowed to feel that it that that it excuse me to feel that it is a substitute there's no it there for responsible questioning and responses at news conferences this is no time for major media outlets to turn the other cheek the entire story must always be told no matter where it leads or what it arouses in the American people well I guess the tweet is the modern version of the fireside chat yes but they are saying that it was Donald Trump's tweet who made the republicans back off and it wasn't it was the people okay who saw what was going on they wanted to kill the ethics panel so they could do whatever they wanted to do because that crux and this is why I'm grateful to people like Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer who are have the blow horn have the loudspeaker to reinforce public what's the word this approval when I was younger my little brother was annoying they always are my mother always used to say ignore him she had the right idea what about a nice five knuckles shuffle right across the chops is there really nothing else to write or talk about other than Donald Trump's very obvious need for attention well that's how he is he was coddled are we really interested in seeing his picture every time we turn on the computer people like his hair and his pouty lips I am certainly I like Ivanka's pouty lips not interested in what he posts on twitter there is something else to be taken into account a friend toastmasters told me that sometimes you need to look at a problem from a different angle toastmaster I like my toast a little bit dark not burnt but a little dark the new president will have many challenges it is possible that his approach may yield some results he needs a chance to prove himself you don't judge a book by its color yeah alright chief so what do you think break time? ok you will now we will now go to promo by our announcer William H. Morrow III and you will see the debut of our uncensored hard hitting truth administrator the sensible sage and you will also see some very comical south to the border Donald Trump wall cartoons what do you do? yeah very comical they are comical I said and we will be back for the bounce of our show and to those to the person that complained that James P. Madonna got up from his chair go fuck yourself how do you like them apples? you like apples? how do you like them apples? ok 2016 year review here we go uncensored hard hitting truth coming at you well the water flinch still dirty has been since 2014 Monday ranch nothing happened one guy died of a heart attack the code access pipeline a few more things happened dogs, water hoses police shootings killing people for just being sassy, small like weed being black corruptions at a minimum sterling, garner, castile, list goes on and then dallas people start shooting back and all of a sudden the cops take notice maybe we shouldn't just murder people wholesale gorilla shot, psychopaths love animals Orlando 50 people dead in nightclub shooting turns out a gay guy didn't like other gay guys very sad there was a kid that got accused of building a bomb just put a bunch of crap in a suitcase just cause he wanted an obama to recognize him he did lost a lot of icons, ali, prince glenn fry, gary shanling, kerry fischer list goes on first glee is dead dnc convention neoliberals decided to split the party subvert the progressives alienate them gaslight them and because they did not integrate the progressives the dnc lost so there you go they sold the nomination yet they still wind about the russians shenanigans going on in new york iowa, philadelphia california people are sheep hillary hillary everyone's against hillary she's did everything perfectly fidelic astro died kind of a gray area wikileaks you know dnc never refuted the veracity of the wikileaks they just blamed other people like the russians seems to be an ongoing theme brexit, austerity riots in france it's going on all over the world not just here in the u.s and conservative people like trump are getting hired and elected into those offices france england here, italy and we are here in the left left with the most hated candidate to run against the most hated candidate that was an election for the ages we need more truth now more than ever the main stream media is coming after what they call fake news even though they're the corporate owned news and they're by as controlled as a message you get which is pretty much fake and propaganda 101 i would just say that the winners this year the dakoto access pipeline protesters those guys stood their ground and they used the alternative media the main stream media finally took notice when the veteran showed up the fight goes on there but power to the people, they won protest does have an effect the fight goes on that should inspire us and we should all want the truth and we should all want to take care of each other denmark, finland, scandinavia ontario now they're all working on basic income and helping the human race progress by eliminating things like homelessness poverty and trying to create a more perfect union which is what we should be doing here not creating a more perfect cesspool for one percent to take over all right sash boilham california i am done here and happy new year if you like this one, james know we'll get you some more uncensored hard hitting truth peace i want to talk about the very foundation of our entire organization the newsletter that was founded by my cohost and mentor the reverend doctor william j eisman in 1977 and that newsletter is called censored newsletter censored is truth and news fighting censorship and conservative propaganda we believe we are living in the end times and you need newsletter censored newsletter censored provides the kind of truth that most people are afraid to hear can you handle it newsletter censored is for the independent critical free thinker with an open mind besides the reading of censored newsletter censored also has the god project and how to defeat a conservative there is nothing in the mainstream media or the press like newsletter censored so simply go to www.newslettercensored.com and with your gift to support this work get your free annual subscription to the newsletter that started it all in 1977 newsletter censored you need newsletter censored that's www.newslettercensored.com greetings this is james p. madonna of mega life 21 hard hitting podcasts holistic health talk and progressive discussions I want to talk about the very foundation of our entire organization the newsletter that was founded by my co-host and mentor the Reverend Dr. William J. Isman in 1977 and that newsletter is called censored newsletter censored is truth and news fighting censorship and conservative propaganda we believe we are living in the end times and you need newsletter censored newsletter censored provides the kind of truth that most people are afraid to hear can you handle it newsletter censored is for the independent critical free thinker with an open mind besides the reading of censored newsletter censored also has the God project and how to defeat a conservative there is nothing in the mainstream media or the press like newsletter censored so simply go to www.newslettercensored.com and with your gift to support this work get your free annual subscription to the newsletter that started it all in 1977 newsletter censored you need newsletter censored that's www.newslettercensored.com the best way to join our organization is to get your free annual subscription to newsletter censored with your gift to support this work the newsletter of hard-hitting truth and news fighting censorship and conservative propaganda since 1977 there is nothing out there like the newsletter censored in the mainstream media or the press this newsletter is the very best way to join and be a part of our organization we're living the end times so you need newsletter censored go to www.newslettercensored.com for hard-hitting truth you need newsletter censored and now back to the show bye bye okay we are back thank you very much sensational sensible sage sash boiled H. Morrow the third for doing promo oh we are back okay now we will continue with the balance of this week's progressive discussion show geek that brother hold on gotta have the lucky seven bells carry on no research suggests the way to stop a life long peanut allergy they could be dangerous is to feed your baby peanut foods yeah but we want to take that chance we don't know if he is allergic to it the first time out of the box oh is that like the influenza vaccine having a dead influenza virus in it a homeopathic preparations have have something that causes the symptoms alright the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases part of the federal government's national institutes of health issued new guidelines so they get rid of it to healthcare providers and parents they say peanut allergies can be stopped by introducing children to foods that contain the legumes as young as early infancy you hear that people they're legumes they're not nuts the new rules follow scientific research that showed introducing foods with peanuts during infancy can prevent allergies the NIAID said peanut allergies are a growing health problem with no treatment or cure it usually develops in childhood and remains into adulthood in a 2010 survey about 2% of US children had a peanut allergy which was more than 4 times the estimate in 1999 the decision to rework the guidelines came after a trial of more than 600 infants found that a regular peanut consumption until age 5 reduced the likelihood of an allergy by 18 1 Dr. Anthony Fauci NIAID director said people operated under the incorrect assumption that they should prevent their children from eating peanuts because they may be an allergy risk as it turns out counter-intuitively that works against the child Fauci said the new guidelines will save lives and lower healthcare costs we expect the widespread implementation of these guidelines by healthcare providers will prevent the development of peanut allergy in many susceptible children and reduce the prevalence of peanut allergy in the United States the new guidelines are being embraced by the American Academy of Pediatrics which put out recommendations 17 years ago that some families should avoid feeding children peanuts until they turn age maybe the same thing could be done with an allergy to bee stings by giving a child apis, homeopathic apis Dr. Astan Fashir Professor of Pediatrics at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York represented AAP on the guidelines and helped write them he said the three-year-old rule was dropped in 2008 was replaced by the guidance that feeding children and peanut products early is okay he encourages people to forget the old recommendation and follow the new guidelines he asks parents to consult a doctor when picking a peanut food to feed their children and to be aware of choking the guidelines are based on whether a child has eczema or an egg allergy good indicators of peanut allergies really? well, eczema is not spelled an idea that there's a connection to an egg allergy it's not spelled that way good indicators of peanut allergies are eczema and egg allergy it's just coincidental that it has to be that way Fauci suggests parents check with their doctor before moving forward with peanut food just like the chicken pox virus is related to herpes zoster which is the shingles want to send a shout out to personal trainer extraordinaire in the up here in the northeast mr. mario petrus of petrus fit check out his facebook page petrus fit mario petrus the creator himself mario petrus okay the letter writer proclaims that the white working class voted against itself in the last election because it is ill informed ill informed we have access to information from all sources now they're just numbsculls suggesting that a vote for Hillary Clinton would have provided them with federal entitlements of greater value and the federal taxes they would pay on their increased productivity occasioned by more better paying work in an expanding economy sure better paying work on the contrary your reader should be thankful for the ill informed working class whose increased productivity is necessary to pay for the government benefits the informed believe they are entitled to for the about what the rich think they are entitled to and what they get and what they don't pay for I hope that's what they meant there is no anxiety regarding the January 20 inauguration of Donald Trump say it at least one thing is evident Trump and his soon to be administration have incorporated their version of George Orwell's news speaking how they address the American public News speak which is a concept coined by George Orwell in his novel 1984 refers to a language used by those in power that is designed to confuse the public's understanding government policies and actions and to diminish the range of their thought therefore it is incumbent upon the press to remain vigilant and to fulfill its essential role of imparting news and commentary of interest to keep the public informed the public informed from the mainstream American media is not the way to go news on the internet is becoming more and more tricky and controversial so there is only a small handful of sources I respect talking about like I like democracy now I like Gronysander's page Jill Stein's page not many it shows that's a good page your cradle in my view lacks integrity in my opinion your paper favors one party more than the other you constantly lambast and ridicule Republicans and conservatives but he prays and filter non-favorable information on Democrats and liberals it is kind of disheartening I think that our press has lowered its journalistic standards so much I am still holding out hope that you realize that you have a fiduciary responsibility to report the news and not manufacture it suit your needs or agenda really so if the newspaper criticizes Republicans and conservatives then this person considers that bashing lambasting one side he hit a raw nerve with somebody you are picking on him you are negative because you are telling him something they do not want to hear or they might not even be aware of it because of their allegiance to their party I bet these knuckleheads believe and trickle down economics which doesn't exist it can exist but they don't let it exist but I bet these knuckleheads why would you let it exist you know we had this argument how many times well if it trickles you have to the CEO has to arrange it to trickle but it's got to go to the CEO first of course no not of course it goes to the lower you are making this up just to antagonize me because you are not getting the point I am talking logic you are talking the same logic who decides if the money is going to trickle down or not where the money is coming from the grand poobah comes down from the universe where the money is coming from in a company in a corporation in anything comes from the top but if the money you want to distribute but you have to allow it why do you want to give it to the guy on the top first well he usually collects the profits from the products being sold but he never trickles it down that's why I said he's not allowing it to trickle because there's no such thing as trickle down no there's not because it pulls at the top and the CEO decides to share the prosperity of the corporation with the employees he decides it which he doesn't do but government does not work like that and the money comes from government not from the CEOs the guy who owns Papa John's people pizza made a statement we are not obligated to share the prosperity of our company with our employees so that debunks trickle down economics right there that's not the point I'm arguing that's not the point just to bust my balls you are arguing as things are right now all the benefits go to the top yeah they pull up I want to change that well then why have a CEO then what's the difference the CEO is not government he's not making government decisions of where the money is going to go oh so what you're saying what's the 35 that airplane I want to buy so what you're saying is if it's a company let's say that makes office equipment like staple guns staplers you want the employees to get a percentage of the sale of those staples staplers I don't know how you can understand it because you're missing are you the knucklehead that told me that cops shouldn't have guns like the bobby's in London England or was it somebody else you're changing the subject I'm talking about ultra liberal ideas that don't work trickle down doesn't work cause it's never been done I just said that no you didn't you want to continue it in the guise that it does well you're saying it can't be done right I said I don't want it ever to be done well how do you then how does an employee prosper this is the argument we already had how does an employee prosper with the company how does an employee prosper with the company you are putting a factory in place of the government the government makes these decisions with money not a factory so you're talking about more or less a democratic socialism correct not more or less more well that would have happened if we would have had an administration with people like Sanders and Stein and Ralph Nader it might have also happened or Dennis Kucinich too if people like yourself what happened to him by the way that don't misunderstand why you've got to continue giving to the guy upstairs for you to benefit the way it is look at all the major charities why do they have to have a CEO it's a fundraiser forget the CEO that's nothing the government gets the federal reserve prints the goddamn money from the government why don't you just say having corporations that privately owned corporations with shareholders and the CEO bad idea it sucks it doesn't work that's it it's capitalism well I never said I was a fan of capitalism well it sounds like it when you want to continue it what the hell do you think trickle down is well it would be nice to share the prosperity of a company with your employees the company is different from government you can do anything you want with the CEO of your stinking company I couldn't give a shit what you do so that's why they get away with all the shenanigans they get away with CEOs, presidents forget the CEOs going to those on the top well that's why they get away with the shenanigans that they get away with because they can they seem to get away with it but people like you wanting them to do it and continue it I'm talking about I know what you're talking about I'm talking about the teabaggers that some of them don't have a pot to piss in that for some reason believe in this flag waving capitalist American way I'm talking about them they are talking about money going to some jerk on the top and then hoping he would share it with those idiots on the bottom hey the same thing goes I'm not talking about that the same thing goes for TV evangelists like Joel Osteem there's no I don't see the poor and the homeless being helped by him he's pulling he's taking donations and helping himself and his family so he's like a corporate CEO also it's part of the system he is a corporate CEO religion is a business I'm talking about government well not originally originally it's always a business so you're not in favor of Christianity tithing was given to help them evangelize or do what they want to do well so it's always been there so then why are you the reverend why are you why do you have the God project religion has always been a business cause it ain't my business is it in the bible that there's a business there tithing is a business tithing is a business you're taking in money and you're using the money to continue your business now the concept of tithing can be corrupted it is corrupted in the sense of tithing when it's going to his Cadillac or its mansion and not to the people again well socialism can be it has been corrupted also by the Soviet Union by Lenin, Stalin, whatever yeah so what does that have to do with trickle down you're way off the subject no you have this raw nerve about the words trickle down you seem to know what it is you seem to know you're like Billy Morrow you want to make it sound like you know it all and James don't that's what it is I know what it is if you don't understand a concept it is no a shame to admit you don't understand something I know what trickle means what does it mean I know what down means I mean your concept well when it comes to companies a president or a CEO yeah when it comes to the government and the board of directors the government well the assholes that are in congress the senate, the president see the people we the people well we're supposed to be there we're not there now and why is that we haven't accepted our charge no we've been brainwashed we've been intimidated whatever we're brainwashing there is no whatever there's a logical reason for everything the history books you had in school and I had in school were horseshit and everyone else had including the tea bags well I didn't have just one book see that's the difference well every grade I had I should have another book no I didn't get a history book no I didn't say that I go to the library and enhance my readings yeah try to get America's youth to spend a lot of time at the library but I did and that's me me me me I was not America's youth okay but the point is trickle down is not a good thing most of my balls continue with the show alright understand that or it continues because you have a reverence for the CEO which I'm trying to deflate well if somebody has a job usually they have supervisors and you know it goes up up up up up but that's a different thing like a pyramid okay different entirely from where the money comes which I'm interested in not the person or who he is to me whether he's my boss or whatever well the employees through blood sweat and tears produce the profits for the companies so why give it to the CEO ah oh he's finally getting around to it folks that's the setup I want to do away with it somebody has to make managerial decisions for a company not my money not my money do you make managerial decisions for your newsletter of course you do is it the CEO's money first or my money first who produces the wealth for the company for the people who actually produce it then it's my money first why would I want it going upstairs and it trickled down to me grab the concept man the concept is garbage because supposedly I think the stockholders own the corporation own as far as owning it but they don't but that's an investment they're investors we're not again talking about a factory or a company talking about the United States government and where it puts its money okay and they have made decisions at least from the 70s to provide all benefits to those who already have trickled down see it I am a straight man who met and fell in love with a transgender girl okay I will call Eve I fell in love besides we dated for almost three years and they were the happiest of my life in all that time we never once had an argument she said I had given her the strength to come out to her family and begin her transition I was planning to oh god what's going that far without any indication that anything was wrong she dumped me one day and weeks later began dating her friend another transgender girl oh two trans two transgenders as a couple so it's not it can't call them lesbians you can't call I don't know what to call them I wanted to walk away I wanted to walk away I wanted to walk away and take time to heal but he's maintained that I was important to her and we could remain friends yeah usually the feminine wants the significant other to be the masculine but in that case it was like two fens for the next few months we tried but her new girlfriend treated me like I was a threat while I was emotionally hurting she seemed to take intense pleasure in showing me how happy they were to get that oh that's pettiness that's pettiness it eventually led to friction friction and now my ex thinks I caused it maybe the ex was never meant to be because I was jealous beforehand but then he should just let it go he cut off all contact with me like I said the love was not I stood by her when she absolutely needed my support but when the time came to give a little back I was abandoned hey what did Captain Kirk say to Charlie you know the other girl has to feel it too it's not just you you know what I mean I'm worried I will never trust anyone again and I don't know how to get back myself it's very difficult to trust nowadays can you help you're a it might help if you consider that there are more than physical changes when making the kind of transition Eve was undergoing she may have felt that her trans friend was better able to relate to what she was experiencing than you were that's why you're looking chicks have some of them have gay friends because they talk girl talk related it was cowardly of her to just dump than to tell you she had doubts about your relationship and it was selfish of her to pressure you to hang around as just a friend it also was not real what you are feeling is normal however it might help you to move forward if you keep in mind that all women are not the same that building trust takes time and give yourself time to heal before replacing I've had people look me straight in the eye and lie to me so that gives you an example how tough it is to trust nowadays not only nowadays it's always been some people can do that they can look you in the eye and lie and not flinch how many Indians could a low rate of trust only taco back then the Native American was always demonized they were called savages of course the white settlers and the pioneers were all innocent they didn't do anything wrong as they stole the land from Native Americans that's how it was President elect Donald Trump says that no computer is safe when it comes to keeping information private expressing new skepticism about the security of online communications his administration is likely to use for everything from day to day planning to international relations Trump rarely uses email or computers despite his frequent tweeting you know if you have something really important write it out well tweeting is a modern way of writing it out and have it delivered by courier you want to spend the money it's cheaper to tweet the old fashioned way maybe the cheap fashion way is to just tweet every time you want to say something it gets around I like to hit your fairness with my chilelli and then there will be no heat why does it sound like a fucking helicopter pissing me off because there's something in the blower don't belong there well then you got a particle something a knucklehead knucklehead of maintenance people that are coming here the maintenance person could do nothing the blower is encased in a case so the problem is you can't get into it it's like but yeah I got you you'd have to put a whole new blower in because I'll tell you what it can be digressed no computer's safe no computer's safe Trump has repeatedly cast aside allegations by US intelligence agencies that Russia tried to influence the presidential elections were acting Barack Obama ordered sanctions on Russia spy agencies last week closed to Russian compounds expelled 35 diplomats the US said we're really spy so they pulled like an FDR routine with the Japanese Americans they pulled something a little bit similar not quite as harsh but the Russians have gone back to Russia they kicked out of the United States well you say it with like you believe oh Russia ruined Hillary Clinton's campaign oh I'm shedding a tear you don't think the Russians did I no let's forget about the Russians I think that Donald Trump is a slightly lesser of the two evils compared to Hillary Clinton that's my take on but that's your personal opinion we're not talking about that we're talking about let's forget about Russia for a minute did someone besides Comey want to give bad information about Hillary Clinton bad information bad information aside from whether it was true or false bad information you mean motives well there's a motive behind it obviously well of course Donald Trump relished in any bad information coming out about Hillary Clinton when Bernie was in the primaries his support has relished also in bad information about Hillary Clinton but you know hey DNC did their dirty deeds and somebody did the dirty deeds with the final election so there was an agenda an agenda was to hurt the Hillary Clinton campaign in some way shape or form now I find the dealings between Vladimir Putin and I believe it's ExxonMobil to be suspicious it's not suspicious they have business dealings there's an Arctic Circle there's this oil near the Arctic Circle whatever it is they have business dealings and that is why Trump likes Mr Putin it has to do with Trump Trump is always looking for the next buck even though he's a multi billionaire Trump's whole cabinet is all about making money for the big boys and girls so if you're a multi-billionaire something happens in your brain and you're just not satisfied that's the way it seems to me whatever the point is somebody had an agenda see if she wants to run you know if I let her out now you know that somebody is going to come over and say the mamba wants to come back in the mamba wants to come back in by that time we'll be banged on oh yeah there's agendas there's agendas you know if you want to use Sherlock Holmes deductive reasoning there are go ahead there are agendas obviously agendas of greed agendas of big business this particular agenda was to hurt the campaign yeah right he plans to meet with intelligence officials in coming days to learn more about the allegations he said he wants US officials to be sure because it's a pretty serious charge he pointed to intelligence failures on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the US invasion and declared himself an expert in the area I know a lot about hacking he said he don't use computers but he knows a lot about hacking how the hell does he yeah sure he does and hacking is very hard thing to prove he's an expert you know it could be somebody else he added cryptically that he also knows things that other people don't know and so they cannot be sure of the situation there are people who are trained in hacking just like there are people who are trained in internet security and there are people who just know programmers probably originally programmers that learned how to hack usually in other countries I know in third world countries like I know for a fact that computer wizards in Columbia South America even learn how to hack and so the world the world learns how to hack if you got the foundation in computers before the word hacking became a common word we used to hear about people that get off getting viruses and trojans and you know what I mean usually probably a little scrawny little ugly geeks that don't have any manhood so this replaces their lack of manhood to create a virus to screw up a big organization and make trouble guarantee guarantee go ahead what time is it is it that time two minutes after four that clock is a little fast one more one more for the world congressional republicans are planning a massive overhaul of the nation's tax system next year the rich are going to get more of a tax break I can guarantee you that a heavy political lift that could ultimately affect families of every income level and businesses of every side well if you're going to strangle the middle class you're going to strangle small businesses because that is the middle class their goal is to simplify a complicated tax code they want the flat tax I bet that rewards wealthy people with smart accountants as well as corporations that can shift profits and jobs overseas it won't be easy see that's what the flat tax is it allows companies to pay even less taxes it just happens it works that way the last time it was done was 30 years ago Ronald Reagan senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and speaker Paul Ryan and two pieces of shit have vowed to pass a tax package and will not add to the budget Washington term is revenue neutral yeah what about the revenue going into the military that's over 50% of the budget right 57% of the total US budget it means that for every tax cut there has to be a tax increase oh sure the middle class strangle them make them poor create winners and losers oh yeah the top 1% or 20% become the winners and everyone else below that become the losers lawmakers would get some leeway if non-partisan congressional analysts projected a tax cut would increase economic growth raising revenue without increasing taxes nevertheless passing the package will require some tough votes some key republican senators want to share the political risk with democrats they argue that a tax overall must be bipartisan to be fully embraced by the public I don't see anything wrong at all with taxing the rich they don't like it fuck them I see a big problem with taxing the middle class when our tax system was never set up to tax anything but the rich the rich well it's a progressive tax system like you said thousands of times thousands of times but it's also been corrupted over the years with deductions and etc etc etc corrupted just like if you look in the dictionary and you read the definition of liberal and socialism and so on and so on communism they're not negative at all they actually sound very positive but they were corrupted and what corrupts nice things that are corrupt themselves so the problem goes back to the human nature they cite President Barack Obama's health law which passed in 2010 without any republican votes as a major policy initiative that remains divisive congressional democrats say they are eager to have a say but McConnell who faulted democrats for acting unilaterally on health care is laying the groundwork to pass a purely partisan bill McConnell said he wants the senate to tackle a tax plan in the spring after congress reveals Obama's health law but you know that these scumbag CEOs are probably pushing the republican congress for this because they are the culprits they are the ones that offer the bribes and they send the lobbyists so this is my deep hatred for the CEO above all the Republican party is always seeking tax cuts because that's the agenda of their puppet masters House Republicans are more eager to get started but haven't yet sent a time some things to know about the republican efforts to overhaul the tax code the House Republicans have released the outline of a tax plan that would lower the individual income tax rate from 39.6% to 33% and reduce the number of brackets from 7 to 3 the gist of the plan is to lower tax rates for everyone and make up the lost revenue by scaling back exemptions deductions and credits the plan retains some of the most popular tax breaks including those for paying off a mortgage going to college making charitable contributions and having children the standard deduction would be increased giving tax-baker payers less incentive to itemize their deductions the non-partisan tax policy center says the plan would reduce revenues by 3 trillion dollars over the first decade with most of the savings going to the highest income households hey man, you people voted for it you re-elected these incumbents you know Billy Moro got so mad when I said he was mentioning how philanthropical people like Bill Gates is yeah, it's a tax write-off for these people it's not from the goodness of their heart he got so mad, he says you and Reverend Bill you gotta be so negative about it you can't look at the positiveness of rich people donating to charity well, I'm being honest there's a reason why they're donating so much Senate Republicans had yet to coalesce around a comprehensive plan or even an outline President elect Donald Trump's plan has fewer details he promises the tax cut for every income level with more low income family paying no income tax at all the tax policy center says Trump's plan would reduce revenue this has been a mega-life 21 production


Hey everybody, we're gonna take a look at how to take this and turn it into this. Now if you haven't seen the video yet, be sure to click the link in the description and go check it out. I could have just done nothing but just play the song and just switch keys with no setup. But I wanted to connect it even more so that each time we hit a key change it feels more natural and it feels more like, oh I felt like this was coming and there's a very simple way to do that. And it's literally just throwing a five chord in front of the new key. Now here's what I mean. We've talked about this whole celebrity singing thing and how funny it was and all that stuff and that's not really what this video is about. This video is just more using that as a way to say how do we take something that is this questionable. And turn it into something that we might actually be able to listen to. Individually there were some clips of people who sang quite well. And there were some clips of people who didn't. But regardless when we squashed it all together it made no sense whatsoever. So my job as in this case I suppose the accompanist I had to figure out how to make it sound a little less like mass chaos. In the first four clips we start in the key of C and we very simply just go up up up up all the way in whole steps to F sharp. So we start here then we go to D then to E and then to F sharp. For me as the accompanist trying to keep up with the singers and make it sound reasonable I have to use some device to allow us to move through those keys and have it sound good. Alright so what is this five chord deal really quick for anybody who doesn't know I'm gonna just kind of cover the super super basics of what this is. Take any major scale right so C major and just give every single one of those notes a number one two three four five six seven and then that is one repeated. The chords just follow the numbers. So if I say five chord that just means the chord that's built from the fifth note of the scale. One two three four five. Right so when we say we're gonna use the five chord of the new key here's what we mean. We started in C and we're going to D. So the five of that new key one two three four five. So it's A and we're just gonna use an A chord. That motion of moving from the five chord to the one chord is like the most common sound in western music. It's a very compelling motion that leads us from that five chord to our home base of the one chord. Basically without getting super in-depth and complicated about it the five chord is all you need to set up just about any key change and it doesn't matter how strange of a movement it is from one key to the next if you put a five chord in front of the new key it's gonna work better than if you just jump straight there with no setup. So let's just take a couple examples of doing this. So I'm gonna start this song in C and I'm gonna just throw it into a couple different keys. Let's as a first one why don't we do what we do E. So we're gonna go from C and then we're gonna play the next line in E which is a major third that's kind of a strange jump and I'm not gonna do anything to set it up and you're gonna be able to see how strange it sounds. It's just odd to jump from one place to the next with no context. So throwing that five chord in front of the new key can help establish that context or at least prepare our ears before we land in that new spot. Check it out. So even though it's still an odd thing to move from C to E when we throw that five chord of E in which case it's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, B. So when we put the B chord in front of the E chord it prepares our ears to be able to make more sense of it once we go into this new unusual key from where we just were. So this single device can clear up so much of the weirdness that comes from jumping around from key to key to key to key as our video in question did but just using the five chord to prepare our ears for each key change can really, really help make it sound a lot more natural. And that's what the feedback from a lot of you on YouTube and on Instagram was. A lot of people were like, how does this sound like it works? How does this sound a little bit less like I want to punch myself in the face? Really just like, what makes this sound more natural? And the answer is, well we gotta give your ears some context so that when we drop into this new unexpected place it's not as violent. It's not as offensive for us to listen to it's just a little bit more sensible and we can do that by giving our ear a little bit of context before we get there. So throughout this entire song we're jumping around from key to key to key and a lot of what I did was literally just put a five chord in front of the new key. Now it didn't always work exactly that way there were a few times when I had to use some other device or honestly there were a few times when I just gave up and so we wound up with what the final product was but using that five chord in front of the new key that was single-handedly the biggest device that I utilized in order to make it sound a little smoother and make it sound a little more natural. Now in the case that any of you would like to look at the music for this I have no idea why anybody would want to do that but just to see what chords I actually used I'm gonna put like, it's not the fully written out music but I put together a lead sheet with just the chords so you can kind of see how I approached the chord structure for moving around all these different keys so I wrote the melody in there and then I put all the chords that I used along with it so if you want to check that out there's a link in the description thanks so much for watching this video and we'll see you in the next one