And then I didn't hear anything about her until six days after I didn't know who she was or that she had disappeared. His wife said, no, we had an unplanned vacation on the 22nd. He dumped our dogs, set fire to the, somehow set fire to the family car and had it crushed.  Wow. Set fire to the family car and how? Well, it somehow burst into flames while he was digging in the backyard. Love it. So ultimately, outside of all of that, he's a known, he's a known person in his local area for being, oh yeah, he's been like in trouble for this in trouble for that. He's lived in about eight or nine states, I think. Right. 20 millimeters, that's a good, that's a good sheet, man. It's a good amount. It's a solid, yeah. It's a solid sheet. All right. I guess are you ready? We'll start. We're ready. Let's roll. Yeah. Okay. Let's go. All right. Here we go. I'm Scott Rouse, my body language expert and analyst. I train law enforcement in the military in the interrogation and body language. And I created with Greg Hartley, BodyLanguageTactics.com. Mark. I'm Mark Bowden. I'm an expert in human behavior and body language. I help people all over the world to stand out, win trust, gain credibility every time they speak, including some of the leaders of the G7. Chase. I'm Chase Hughes. I am a behavioral expert, number one bestselling author in behavior profiling, persuasion and influence. And I develop tactics for intelligence agencies and I train the general public, right? I'm Greg Hartley. I'm a former army interrogator, interrogation instructor, resistance to interrogation instructor. I've written a bunch of books on body language and behavior and Scott and I put together BodyLanguageTactics.com.  Excellent. All right. But today we're going to talk about Steve Panky. And Steve is in trouble for the suspected murder of a girl named Jo Nail, Matthews, back in 1984. Greg, you found the video, why don't you give us a little bit? Yeah, so this is one of those cases. Apparently this guy showed a lot of interest in the case way back in 1984, which made him a little suspicious of him over time. When they found the body, I think then there's some other reasons in their long list. If you go out and do your research, there's a long list of reasons they indicted him. He has run for governor of Idaho twice. He's moved around a lot. His story's an interesting one. Where we got this video is he was willing to sit for an hour on a park bench and talk to a reporter. And the parts of the video, we're looking at are deep into that interview, not the very first part. So we'll talk a little bit about his baseline and what we saw of it. You can find plenty of video of him because he ran for governor twice. Excellent. All right. All right. Well, this is a cold case. So let's view it that way and we'll get started. You ready? Yep. Here we go. At least it looks as if it was you that's commented on a few stories online. Right. The Greeley Tribune story as well as another one. Read the comments. One of the comments was who, question mark, why question mark. Yeah. And then another comment was without a deal, this may never be resolved. Right. And what did you mean by without a deal, this may never be resolved? Just that. Without a deal, it may never be resolved. What kind of deal would you be looking for? Well, not necessarily for me.  A deal was made to avoid a jury trial. And that's how it's done. Deals are done all the time. So if you read all those comments, I did say who, why. Okay. Mark, you wanna go first? Yeah, sure.  If you go back and you look at one of our older videos on Prince Andrew, there are some similarities to I think, to what we're seeing with Prince Andrew. Let me take you through it. Deals are done all of the time. And then there's this downward inflection. He informs of this. Deals are done all of the time. Then he waits, but the interviewer isn't giving him any kind of confirmation that he's buying into this whole thing. And he's a long way into this now. I mean, he built up to this and he hadn't really got any explanation, but deals are done all of the time. So he looks to him, do you confirm that? And the interviewer comes back with nothing for him. So he looks sideways and leans in with that kind of feeling of, are you not going with this? Do I need to give you anything more? Is this going well for me? And it reminds me of Prince Andrew going. So, well, you see in the Navy and that leaning and that look, like the interviewer were going, oh, I see, deals are done all the time. Oh, in the Navy, I get it. Well, okay, let's just call off everything. Stop the whole interview. You've just absolutely proved it to us. No need for any more interview on this. That for me, that lean in, that ask for confirmation, for me is a red flag of someone is going on here. He really desperately wants some confirmation and the interviewer isn't giving it to him. I'm going to leave it at that because this is absolutely packed and I want plenty of other stuff for others to cover. Greg, I want to go to you. What do you got for it? Yeah, so I'm just going to cover two points, two very important points. He does something we call a push-pull word in here, not necessarily for me. Well, hell, if you ask me, it's not about me. If I'm talking about a deal, it's certainly not about me. When he does that, he purses his lips, he turns away and he eye blocks. As he does that, it's not necessarily about me. That's point one. When he comes back, Mark, when he's doing that other piece, he's starting to educate and you can see it. It's almost where he's in his space, where he's going to educate, put his head down and drive that. From that, start paying attention to his lips and him licking his lips in that piece because it's going to build up throughout this as fight or flight starts to get in. And I'm going to leave it at that and hand it to what do you got, Chase? If you watch this back, you'll see a sudden shift from abdominal breathing to chest breathing and you'll see him hold his breath firmly until he figures out what the question is about. And then you see increase in the breathing rate there. And there's use of the word, not necessarily for me, tremendous point of potential deception there, but there's a redirect to something called a positive admission. So I'm going to admit that this other part of the question was me, which is indicative of people who are typically guilty on the behavioral table of elements. Just write down the numbers. He would have scored a 12 and you needed an 11 or higher to have a high likelihood of deception. Explain what that table is. So the table of elements is a periodic table of all human behavior, my best attempt at such. And everything can be added up to include relaxed gestures and stress gestures and everything that we could possibly do. Someone's swallowing, crossing their arms and it's got a deception rating number on every behavior. Where can we get that Chase? Oh, thanks, Scott. Go to chaseuse.com right here and download it absolutely free so you can watch the rest of the videos with or the debates. Hey, Scott, one quick note. People have asked us to go back and explain. So when I say a push pull word, what I mean is a word that has negotiability in it. Like you say, I'm 100% honest. Well, if you're honest, you don't need to say 100% or not necessarily me instead of not me, right? That kind of thing. Right, perfect, perfect. All right, well, now as we go through these and each one of these videos, it's important to keep in mind what we're seeing. A lot of people are gonna say, well, there's not a whole lot here.  It's packed, it's packed. And we all forgot the shits and giggles because there's so much in it and so much going on. Having said that, keep in mind that, and I'll explain to you the way the brain works when you begin lying. Lying is a complex task. And when you begin lying, you use the frontal cortex as engaged because that's where you do all your multitasking. That's where all that happens. And once that's engaged and you're trying to talk and you're trying to do other things to get your point across, that's when you start doing things like in what we saw in this clip where what I call loose illustrators. Where you'll be talking. And the next thing you know, your hands are just moving, but you're not emphasizing specific words or phrases like illustrators do. Like I just said, specific words or phrases, that's an illustrator, those are illustrators. Another thing we see in here that is just beautiful that we see throughout the whole, through this series of videos we're gonna watch, is it starts shaking like this the whole, the entire time. That's part of his baseline when he's doing this. I watched one of the governor, when he was running for governor, I watched one of the things that he wasn't doing that. So that's not part of his natural baseline. So in this situation, he's got so much going on. He's trying to think about what he's gonna say, make sure he gets his point across, make sure he's saying it correctly because he's not said this stuff out loud the way he's saying it now before. And we'll go over why in a little while. So those are really important to pay attention to why he's doing all this. And that's what you're looking for. It's his brains firing off so many things because it's prefrontal cortex is busy, busy, busy. All right, anybody got anything else? Yeah, I mean, just one thing, which is look out for that moment where he pauses for a very, very long time and goes through a number of very, very small movements. I would suggest, and we see that breathing change as well at that point, that I would say is him going, hang on, what's my strategy gonna be here? And he can't work it out. Yeah, so he's really, he's on his toes here. So pay attention to that cadence throughout. I think it's important. Yeah, because it changes often. At least, you know, it looks as if it was you that's commented on a few stories online. Right. The Greeley Tribune story as well as another one. Read the comments. One of the comments was who, question mark, why question mark. Yeah. And then another comment was, without a deal, this may never be resolved. Right. And what did you mean by without a deal, this may never be resolved? Just that. Without a deal, it may never be resolved. What kind of deal would you be looking for? Well, not necessarily for me.  A deal was made to avoid a jury trial. And that's how it's done. Deals are done all the time. So if you read all those comments, I did say who, why. Yeah, right, here we go. Let's look at number two. And then can you tell me why you want it to be resolved? So it's, so it's, so it's resolved. So it's over with. So that family has the same closure that I have, okay? That's.  Oh, absolutely, absolutely. Without a doubt. Okay, Greg, you wanna go?  I'll try to keep it short. This one is so loaded. Let me first start by saying, listen to his mucus membranes crackling as he tries to move his mouth. He's mouth grooming, meaning he's moving his tongue around. That's fight or flight setting and stress. He goes into this, so it's resolved. That's not the word I think I would typically use. That seems like closure might be a word I would use or something I would poke on. What do you mean by resolved? They know that she's dead. So what are you talking about? Then he does his shoulders up, but he doesn't ask for requests for approval. He doesn't raise his brow saying, hey, do you agree with me? And then when they get to, and I'm gonna just hit one point on this and leave most of it to you guys, when they get to, wouldn't you like your name cleared? His brow rises like, oh, never thought of that one. And that immediately would make any interrogator turn on him and go after him really hard. At no, absolutely. And then he shakes his head. No, while he's saying yes, absolutely is what I would do. So there's that piece of body language that he uses consistently throughout this messaging for negative when he's saying a positive message. Scott, what do you get? All right, when he starts saying, when he gets to the point where he says absolutely without a doubt, his voice has been fairly strong up to that point. But then he does what's called fading facts, whereas it gets quieter as you go along. And he seems almost like he's calming down, but he's flipping out because his mouth is open quite often, quite a bit of the time. And I go with the other thing, Greg, about the fight-or-flight kicking in, his mucus and messing with his mouth. His mouth is open because you see him take that deep breath and then sort of relax as he starts going along. This starts getting quieter and quieter as he moves along. Another thing when his head's shaking, no, it's going between shaking, no, and shaking, yes. And then it does this little Indian bobble a little bit back and forth as he's doing that. I've never seen this before.  I've never seen this before. So this is bizarre behavior for me. So unless anybody else seen anything like that before? I've seen people do that under high duress when they're trying to figure out which way to, I won't use my eloquent English for what I would usually say, but yeah, when they're trying to figure out which way they're going, I've seen it in an interrogation room, yeah. Okay, cool, cool. All right, so that's all I've got for that one. So that suggests to me that he's working and he's working through his, he's been confronted with something and he's being deceptive about it. All right, Chase, what do you got? So we see when he says absolutely and without a doubt, we see micro little shoulder shrugs with both of those little phrases. We also saw everything everyone else talked about here. If I was the interrogator, I would say personally, what's the most emotional reason that you have for this to be resolved? Just on a personal level. And that would reveal probably a lot more. I think we would get either a baseline or a good deviation from baseline from this to catch him up, forcing him to bring some kind of fabricated emotion into the conversation. And on the BTOE behavioral table, he only scored an eight for this. Mark, what do you got? Yeah, lovely.  And so her behavior just floods out. She doesn't have a part of her brain to kind of hold back that instinct. And here's what I see in this character that we're watching, which is very similar to Peach, is when Peach wants me to play along with the game and play ball, she will take the ball and she'll just nudge it along with a nose, going, are you gonna play? Are you coming along with me? He does exactly the same thing. After he says that family deserve to have, so the family have the same closure as I have, his head goes to one side and he starts to moderate the conversation by just nudging the ball along a bit. Watch him to say, are you gonna play along with this? Are we gonna move along on this together? And the interviewer is having none of it, is putting under some real pressure here because he's not gonna move along, he's not playing along with this. So go back to that and watch that, and watch that little ball being nudged along by this little puppy. Brilliant. Yeah, as usual. And then can you tell me why you want it to be resolved? So it's resolved, so it's over with. So that family has the same closure that I have, okay? That's...  Oh, absolutely, absolutely, without a doubt. All right, here we go. So what's the next one? It's one last thing. Did you hear earlier this summer that her body was exhumed or found, I should say? Yes. On Northern... Yes, I saw that online. That's a totally legal thing to do is look online. Yeah. When a Greeley cops come to you and accuse you of, or wanna talk to you about this, it's a pretty prudent thing to go online and check on what's the updates. So... All right, Chase, what do you got? Yes, we have something that David Givens is the original researcher, as far as I know, on this topic. And this is a chin withdrawal. The lower jaw pulls back and away from the interviewer here. And that's kind of a self-regulation. He's saying, I need to really reign this in. This is a big question. Totally legal. This is the first time both of his hands come to life, symmetrically, or at the same time at least. And he almost comes forward off the seat. He almost gets his back off the chair here, leans forward to get some generating focus, generating some more interest. And we also see his side preference or gestural hemisphere tendency for positive, negative. When people do this gesturing thing, we see to his right, when he's talking about the police, he's gesturing to his right. So if I was the interrogator, where would I want him? I would want to be on his left and the door to the interrogation room that where all the police are, not me, of course, are to his right. We would wanna set that up that way just from that short conversation there. And he uses the words about this. Not the incident. He was absolutely comfortable saying that his son was murdered. He used the word murder very comfortably. Then he says about this. So this is called psychological distancing or severity softening, depending on who you talk to instead of steal, somebody might say take. Instead of saying rape, somebody might say have sex with. So there's kind of a good stack there. I'm gonna leave the rest of it alone. There's a whole bunch here. I think everybody else unpack on the deception score. He scored a 12 for this. Excellent, Mark, what do you got? Yeah, so I wanna get on a couple of things. Obviously, that's a totally legal thing to do, to look online. Yeah, it is a totally, it doesn't really need saying. And the fact that he says it, obviously, I'm sure as you watching this, when you heard that, you went, hang on, hang on. We do the same. That was for all of us, I think, a laugh out loud when he says that because it doesn't need saying that going online is legal. We know that. So if that's legal, what does he think isn't a legal thing to do? What's the opposite of that would be my inquiry here. But I just wanna say the other thing I wanna say is just how good this interviewer is. Just really good. And there's a lot of Colombo fans on the panel here right now and I'm sure watching at home, you might be a Colombo fan as well. The interviewer opens with one last thing, which obviously isn't the last thing because we've got a whole bunch of other stuff that we're gonna talk about. It isn't the last question done. But in my understanding, that was a classic Colombo method of going, oh, right away, one last thing. That thing of just trying to disarm somebody, disarm somebody by going, oh, thank you. This is finished. Okay, I can now answer and get this person out. Brilliant fun watching this, including the interviewer who's clearly a Colombo fan as well.  Well, he begins as out of his baseline for what we've seen so far, he begins answering a lot sooner than he does with the other ones. And he says, yes. It's like he asked the question and boom, there's the yes. So this is one of those answers I think he's prepared for. Because he's thought about this. A lot of these things he hasn't said out loud. I don't think anybody's come, he's been interviewed about these things, but he's been thinking about them since then, how to phrase them, how to put them together so they sound more believable. So he just fires off that yes as he begins to answer. Also, Greg, you said his sheet had 20 misdemeanors. When you have someone who's gotten away with a lot of things before and they're thinking they're gonna get away with this as well, you'll see him get all giggly about it. And that's what we're seeing here. He's getting that thing like, man, this is nothing for me. I think he feels like he's getting away with this as well because he's gotten away with so many smaller things, so many little bitty things. We've had the conversation Greg and I did about how there may be some other things to look for in the towns. He's been at lived in so many different places to look in the towns if somebody from those police departments are watching, look around and maybe there's some things that this guy did in your town that you're looking for the answer for. Start looking at this guy because he looks like he believes he's getting away with something. And his answer, when he leans back and starts to give an answer, it doesn't have quite the punch he wants it to have even though he's given it. So that's why we see him get, another reason we see him get kind of iffy with all that behavior. Greg, what do you got? Yeah, so I always talk about fighter flight because it is one of the most powerful things in our bodies. And Scott, you started talking about prefrontal cortex and that starts turning off once you get into fighter flight. So once the amygdala identifies a threat, then you start dumping stress hormones in your body and that starts to turn off and you start to think like a cat instead of a human. You respond. And he's doing some of that. I rarely have heard this much dry mouth outside of Sear School. I mean, I've interrogated real prisoners and Sear School guys. And this sounds like Sear School, dry, dry mouth, all of the aggression and things that go with that. So it takes blood flow away from the mucous membranes and you can't miss it. In fact, in Sear, you would see people starting to build up protein in the corners of their mouth from mucous membranes being destroyed by stress. Only place I've seen it. His blink rate increases when he touches his nose. This is a stress comforter for him. That's an adapter in some way.  But in this, you'll see further into the interview, he does it in a couple of stress times.  At accused, he leans out, drops away into a nervous laugh. And Scott, I think he's flirting with disaster as a term I would use. I think he thinks he's got some potential to dance around this thing. And he may even be intentionally engaging the police this way. But I think he's gonna get hooked if he keeps doing what he's doing.   And Chase, I think you did a brilliantly eloquent explanation of that once before when a little kid goes, it's that same thing. They don't even believe what they're saying. And that nervous laughter at the Greeley police we'll see again. I think this guy is in for real trouble. And if I were interrogating him, I would be all over that nervous laugh. I would be all over the things where he's talking about, if you're accused, I would be all over those pieces along with some of the other stuff in the background. So thanks, that's what I got, Scott. Yes, one last thing. Did you hear earlier this summer that her body was exhumed or found, I should say? Yes, I saw that online. That's a totally legal thing to do is look online. When a Greeley cops come to you and accuse you of, or want to talk to you about this, it's a pretty prudent thing to go online and check on what's the updates. So. Excellent. All right, we good? Yeah. All right. Move forward. In 1989, we moved, I was married at the time, we moved to Ketchum, Idaho and then Shoshone, Idaho. And in Shoshone, I joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I had a rocky marriage and when they were talking about families lived forever, it sounded really good to me. And when I got the ordination and was baptized and all of that, the bishop asked me if there was anything I wanted to confess, if there was anything like bothering me that I needed to get off my chest. And I said, yeah, back when I lived in Colorado, this girl disappeared and I had this weird conversation about it and it bothered me. And so anyway, the bishop then told the stake president which is in Kerry and there was a lieutenant with the Sun Valley Police Department who was also in the Kerry stake thing. I had to clean my glasses there because I just spat my water over my glasses laughing. This one's funny. Yeah, this one I'm gonna focus on something very odd because it's first time I've ever seen it. Go first. Yeah, so in this one, when he gets asked the question, he goes to internal voice as he works out dates. Now I'm gonna give you a great example of that. As you sit thinking about where you were in eight months ago on this day, think back, watch yourself having an internal conversation. That's internal conversation when people's eyes drift down to their left and he has an internal conversation and he does this weird thing.  He looks left, he accesses, then he looks right, has a really weird eyebrow flash. And I wonder what it is, but then he tells me what it is because as he's speaking, he edits. That's what he does when he's editing what he was going to say. Cause you watching me does exactly the same move again. Now, if I'm interrogating him and I'm sitting across the place and I'm asking him questions, now I know when he's making changes to his story. And if you're going to interrogate this guy for law enforcement, give me a call. I'll tell you where to look for it because this is going to be one you can use. This guy has a tell that he can't hide. You can see it coming.  He does a the nose touching thing that I talked about earlier for stress when he talks about a rocky marriage. I think this is a good, another indicator for him for stress. So there's two you can have if you're going to interrogate the guy. Chase, what do you got? Yeah, so we see a reconformation here of his baseline for gestural hemisphere which is right and left positive. And it's so powerful that he gestures to his right which is where all of us would gesture towards the future in a timeline. He gestures to the past that direction because that's so hardwired into his hemispheric tendency which I think is a great confirmation video there. And he makes this what I call a mini confession. And just a quick wrap of that is from a police standpoint this mini confession is it stems from our natural need to say that something happened. I did something. We have a need to confess. That's why a lot of it is addictive in churches. And there's even confessionals that are non-religious. So in a police scenario, a guy might be there for a homicide and he might say, well, I did not commit any murder or anything like that, but I have 13 grams of heroin in the ashtray of my car and I've been meaning to tell somebody about it. I just want to let you know.  Everything's been deleted. And the husband says, well, it's just somebody from work but I have been meaning to tell you I downloaded this app called Tinder a few weeks ago. I thought it was just for networking but I deleted it just a couple of days later. That's a mini confession. And we see some embarrassment here as he's talking about the church and this slight head shake, I think is his baseline to communicate that what he's saying is of little significance and he wants you to agree that this is just not a big deal. This is not a very significant statement. It's not a big deal. Deception score on this is an eight according to Chase Hughes anyway. Mark, what do you got? Yeah, so body language wise throughout that there's just too many adapters to even count. I mean, it's just so rampact with them. I just want to leave you at home to kind of go through and go, okay, there's one, there's one, there's one, there's one, there's one. Look, Mark, I want to remind everybody what an adapter is. Well, so it's something that you're gonna do which is gonna, I would say alter the world around you in order to make you feel more comfortable with it because I would suggest psychologically what's happening is you feel like you're not controlling this well but you can control something around you. You can control something around your body with your own hands. That's the way I look at it. I don't know whether that concurs with you guys but that's the way I go for it. Okay, here's what I wanna really pick out on is he's using in his storytelling what we call nested loops which is he's taking you on a journey that just keeps changing location and changing tack and changing tense and changing the characters and it's tiring. It's just tiring to listen to this thing because it doesn't get anywhere. So by the end of it, when he goes Sun Valley Police you don't wanna question it because you're kind of like, I'm exhausted just by going through this long list of things. 1989, married, married, two locations, church, rocks, marriage, families live forever, cough, ordination, baptism, bishop, confession, back where I lived, girl disappeared, bothered anyway, state president, lieutenant, Sun Valley Police.  That's his tack. I will just agree to all of that because I don't wanna get in there and try and undo this. And of course, what you do is an interrogator as an interviewer on this is to go, yeah, I actually do want to unravel some of that. Like, tell me about families live forever and that cough. Like, what does that mean to you? What does it mean? What do you mean by families live forever? Those are some of the places that I want to go on this. It's tiring and quite hilarious to listen to. That's what I got. Excellent. All right, well, here's what I got. Now, I talk about loping. It's something that I coin where if someone's talking, telling a story and everything seems fine. And in this situation, what we're seeing is we're seeing sort of version two of that because we're seeing in loping, but at the same time, we're seeing what I call, I don't know what to call it, but a contrast addiction because his words are going longer and they're lasting longer. Even though these short words are small, it takes longer to get them out. So he's kind of cruising along at that speed saying, speaking like that. So we see in his baseline this contrast addiction. So it's not like the really short choppy words where he's talking like this and a little fast and the words are going quickly. They're just be talking like this where the words are going slowly. They're almost stuck together. They're almost syrupy as they go along. The part where he talks about where he talked to the bishop and he said, and when he asked me, was there anything you wanted to confess? Was there anything that bothered him? And he said, yes, there was a girl that disappeared. He didn't know how to approach that or he knew how, but he was still being careful as he went through this. I think what we're seeing here because the way he started talking about this and at the point where he says, this girl disappeared, it bothered me. And he says, and so anyway, that's bridging. He's leaving so much out. I mean, there's so, you can have a so and that's all that you can leave a lot out there. You can have it and leave a lot out there. And you can have again, you can have another so. But then when he says, anyway, that's the big one. That's anyway, we went and did this as we're going through that. Now with all this bridging happening, I think here's what happened. I think he thought if he confessed to this guy, the bishop, he's not gonna tell anybody. So I think what's happened is the bishop went to whoever the police said, hey, man, I'm talking to this guy. I think he killed this girl. So that's when they said, okay, well, quite, we'll start asking about it because he leaves that part out too. He calls it a weird conversation. Then he goes in and the bishop calls so and so and then he's somehow connected to it all. And all that is just his little pieces of information. He's not saying what happened in that interrogation that he went through. Here go the edit when he's thinking. Yeah, yeah. So I think he told, I think he spilled this guy. And I think this guy said, look, something's up with this guy. I can't tell you everything, but trust me, something's up with this guy and you talk to him. That's what happened. And he's not talking about that. And I'm sure the guys that interviewed this guy or interrogated him are like, that's exactly what happened. I think I got a hundred bucks that says that's exactly what happened. And the whole time he's doing this, we don't see any emotion whatsoever. Nothing, but other than these fake smiles we see because we don't see a Duchain smile at all, we see almost the giggly little thing, but that's not even real either. That's just that uncomfortable blurt out of I'm uncomfortable. And I'm trying to move on from this. You get what I'm talking about. That's what I think happened. I think he told somebody, I think he told that Bishop what happened. The Bishop goes to the cops because they're not supposed to or whatever. And that's what's happened there. All right, we good? In 1989, we moved, I was married at the time. We moved to Ketchum, Idaho, and then Shoshone, Idaho. And in Shoshone, I joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I had a rocky marriage and when they're talking about families live forever, it sounded really good to me. And when I got the ordination and was baptized and all of that, the Bishop asked me if there was anything I wanted to confess, if there was anything like bothering me that I needed to get off my chest. And I said, yeah, back when I lived in Colorado, this girl disappeared and I had this weird conversation about it and it bothered me. And so anyway, the Bishop then told the stake president which is in Kerry and there was a lieutenant with the Sun Valley Police Department who was also in the Kerry stake thing. I'm not accusing the cop of doing whatever caused her demise. I'm saying that I think under the circumstances back then that a cop could have been involved in it, okay? They lied a lot to me. Okay, I've talked a lot. All right, Chase, what do you got? We see two instances right away of psychological distancing. Whatever happened to that girl and demise, whatever and demise. We know it's a murder. We already know that his baseline, if he's comfortable, he says the word murder. So there's two there. And there's a single shrug when he says, whatever happened to this girl or whatever happened? And there's some over-politeness here which according to me and a couple of articles, this self-effacing comment when he's saying, I've talked too much is a spike in politeness. So a spike in politeness is different than just someone being polite. I did an interrogation in Los Angeles a few years ago and somebody walked into the interrogation room calling me bro and dude the whole time. And all of a sudden I started digging down and I said, has anybody ever seen you take anything from here or here? And he goes, oh yeah, no sir, no sir, absolutely not sir, not at all. So that's a spike in politeness. So with all of those things added up from this video, his behavioral table deception score is 16. Greg, what do you got? Yeah, so a couple of things. I'm gonna give you some homework to go back and look at the rest of the video.  When he breaks, the only time you see Blinkrate really increase on him is when he breaks eye contact. It's really interesting to watch. I mean, some of these will be a 30 second span video with two Blinks. That's amazing. Yeah. That's hypnotic stare is what I've referred to that as. The guy's trying to convince you. You'll see him here. His cadence, now we talk about voice, his cadence shifts in this conversation. He says, I am not accusing the cops of dot, dot, dot, doing dot, dot, dot, whatever led to her demise. That's a lot of editing. That's talking and editing at the same time. There's also in the case when he says accusing here, he breaks eye contact. The only time he does it in the entire video I've seen is he breaks eye contact down. And that's submission typically. Most people don't break eye contact down. They're thinking they move their eyes around and they go from there. The other thing is he's got this okay. When he's asking for approval, when he's wanting to make sure where you're going, okay, okay, and you'll hear it. If you go back through the video, you'll see it. Now all the stuff is starting to come together and then he starts to try to tell his second part of the story. His first part of the story is I'd never heard of this girl before six days after she's dead. That's his defense. Second part of his story is in the cops, we're in on it somehow. He's starting to tell his conspiracy theory story now. And he does a lot of requests for approval. Forehead comes up. You don't see that through the rest of the video. It's when he hits these things he's trying to convince you of, you see the brow rise. That's what I got. Scott? Here we see he's speaking a little louder comparatively to the way he's been talking so far. It's almost like this, when he gets out about the cop and he's talking about how they could have, he could have been involved with the cops could have been involved. He again goes to those short choppy words. He goes from the longer words or they're long and like that they go to the short choppy words. And he sounds a little more, the sound is a little more aggressive toward this. So I think this is a rehearsed answer. Well, when he's said before, because apparently he has a big backstory with his conspiracy theory there. So I think the answer was ready. There's no emotion here again, except for what sounds like anger. But that's going to happen when you're dealing with psychopath. You're going to get a little bit of that. And then I've got three things that I had to check off because of you and Chase, Greg. So, Mark, what do you got? Yeah, so let's look at the logic that he gives before that okay to try and see whether we're going to play along with this. I'm not saying a specific cop murdered someone. That's fair, yeah. I am saying a cop could have murdered someone. Well, yeah, that's, yeah. Yeah, a cop could have murdered someone. Yeah, absolutely. So it's very, that is brilliantly structured because it's hard for us to not say, well, yeah, okay, that's a possibility. A cop could have murdered someone, but a specific cop, that would be an absolute allegation of somebody specific. But we can sign up to the second idea, which means, hey, maybe we can sign up to the first idea. He's putting in something very easy for us to logically sign up to there and doing the okay. And actually the interviewer is great. Clearly doesn't give him the okay on that. Goes, I'm not signing up to any of that. Here's what I really love though. If you go in there and you play that final bit after I've talked a lot, what you'll see is one frame where the side of his mouth comes up into a half smile. I'm willing to put $100 for Scott on Wishing Dupers Delight there. I think it's fast enough. And it's just in the right place around, I've talked a lot and that idea of, yeah, and I've talked some really good stuff. I quite enjoyed some of my stuff that I did there. That was pretty smart stuff that I just did. I think we're seeing Dupers Delight. Now, I could be wrong because it's a really tricky one. It's a really tricky one, but at home watching this, why don't you put in the comments what you think? Do you think I'm right? Do you think I'm wrong? You'd be the judge. Man, that's what I got. Excellent. All right, well, that's pretty good. I'm not accusing the cop of doing whatever caused her demise. I'm saying that I think under the circumstances back then that a cop could have been involved in it. Okay? They lied a lot to me. Okay, I've talked a lot. All right, let's move on. Let's move on. I think if I simply state the truth in, I didn't know she existed or disappeared until six days after the fact. Once that's established, okay, I had this short conversation. Now, if I would like to have my name cleared, yeah. They've got all of this stuff. They have really screwed up my life by taking all of that stuff. I don't think they're gonna find anything, but I think they're gonna leave this shadow of disappearance of evil with me.  So who wants to go first? I'll make mine short. This is simple. Never mind the elephant in the room. I don't think they're going to find anything. Hell, I guarantee you they're not finding anything in my house, just that's pretty simple. The next piece is here's his whole story. I didn't know about this girl. If you buy that, okay, then it must be somebody else and it is them trying to hurt me yet again and here's what they're going to do. That's his whole story. He just did his closing argument early in the game because this is actually earlier than some of the other stuff. His body language, I'll leave all that nuanced body language and all of that tweaking and moving alone and then there's cadence. Listen to that cadence, that chop, chop, block, block, chop, chop, block, block, block, navigating a minefield and that's what I got. Right, Chase, what do you got? So I'll just cover two things here. There's a prolonged eye contact again where he's selling this hard. I think he blanks one time as he's talking about this thing. I didn't know she existed or even disappeared. Didn't know. But Mark made a brilliant video of us talking about, I think it was Andrew when we're removing ourselves a certain number of times from something and in his initial part of the statement, he says, I think, well, if I simply state the truth in, and he says the word in, in this statement. So I'm gonna count it as four, there were five total. We'll count it as four. Some of those things will lump them together. And we see some concealed uncertainty here with the gorilla in the room that Greg mentioned. And there's a failure to clearly state that you were accused of something you didn't do. We see this with Bill Clinton. We saw this with Anthony Weiner. We saw this with Colonel Russell Williams, who was a Canadian Air Force Colonel, a failure to clearly state that you're being accused of something. We see it with guilty people all the time. Total deception score 14. Mark, what do you got? That's a big score. That's a big score. Chase, I know that you love it when I bring in the Romans, but at this point, I'm gonna go to Thessalonica because I think it's a great place to go because, yeah. Yeah, I'm gonna go to Thessalonica. I'm gonna move to... My wife will get it. He was in my first period of class in the eighth grade. So Thessalonica, the Thessalonicans is a Bible verse. There's a verse in the Bible, and it says abstaining from the appearance of evil, not only the idea of just staying away from evil, but if you're a godly, righteous person, you should stay away from even the appearance of something evil. What he says is they'll leave the shadow of the appearance of evil with him. Well, that's really interesting because in order to create a shadow of evil, you would need somebody to cast light onto that evil and that evil to block that light so you would get the shadow of evil. The metaphor here I would suggest in his mind is there is something evil here that can cast a shadow. I think if he didn't think there was anything evil there, he would go that they are casting the shadow of evil, that they are the evil one, but their light, their investigation has hit something solid and evil and that has cast the shadow.  There, that's what I got. I hope you liked that one, Chase. That was brilliant. You didn't have to make up a word for it, but... That was brilliant. That was brilliant. Wow, that was... See how we should go and last. That's why I try to make you go last on these things. Now, here's me with... You gotta wrap it. Dang it. I gotta go back to the brain on this. And again, we're dealing with that prefrontal cortex. That thing is on fire right now.  So as it's burning to help him multitask, it's being shut down because he's almost in a panic state at this point. So that's why we're seeing him. That's why we see every bit of body language we're looking at in this which has been covered by everybody else. That's what we're seeing and how he's talking. Even though his words get choppier and smaller and faster as he goes along. Then he stops and they're all choppy and small. So there's no loping in here. He's just fighting his way through it as his brain is taking along and fighting to stay to keep that part of his brain open. So I think that's what we're seeing there which just nails down the deceptive... I want to chase on this deception through the roof, man.  It's unlimited. So if not a guy contact, I'll give him 100 points.  There, okay. I think if I simply state the truth and I didn't know she existed or disappeared until six days after the fact. Once that's established, okay, I had this short conversation. Now, if... You know, I would like to have my name cleared, yeah. They've got all of this stuff. They have really screwed up my life by taking all of that stuff. I don't think they're gonna find anything but I think they're gonna leave this shadow of this appearance of evil with me. So if you like this show, go ahead and subscribe and hit the like button and we're all good. I'll see you guys next time.  Absolutely not.


In my video on pomegranates and prostate cancer, pomegranate pills appeared useless in the treatment for prostate cancer, and the same disappointing results with a pomegranate beverage, but that was just a pomegranate extract, as well. So maybe the pomegranate itself cannot be blamed for the ineffectiveness seen in the study, but rather the low dose of the pomegranate active principles in the extract. But what is the active principle? Extracts will boast about the level of ilagic acid. Definitely one of the more potent of the phytochemicals found in pomegranate, however it's not as strong as the pomegranate itself. What they mean is that the components may act synergistically. The whole may be greater than the sum of its parts.  So what if you add them both together? What do you think would happen? 30% suppression plus zero suppression equals 70% suppression. That's synergy, where 1 plus 1 is greater than 2. Here they are under a microscope. That's what prostate cancer cells look like. Here's with the 30% compound. Here's with the useless one. And here's with both. So any attempt to characterize the power of a medicinal food by standardizing a single chemical is missing the entire point of plant-based medicine. So the standardized extracts represent a cynical, money-driven attempt to replace the power of the pomegranate with the power of ilagic acid. But the pomegranate needs no such tricks or enhancements. It's powerful as is. So why don't they just try the fruit out on cancer patients? Because you can't stuff a pomegranate in a pill, so you can't compare it to an indistinguishable sugar pill placebo. Drugs are easy to study. People don't know if they're taking the active drug or the placebo, but they tend to notice if they're eating a pomegranate or not.  Of course, the patients wouldn't care if they got better. Who cares? But to change medical practice, we want to know if the fruit is actually something special. I suppose you could create some kind of pomegranate smoothie versus some fake smoothie, but that sounds logistically difficult. Researchers tried powdering it. 199 men with prostate cancer either got a placebo or a tablet three times a day containing 100 mg of whole powdered pomegranate.  It comes out to be about 6 pomegranate seeds worth a day. One one-hundredth of a pomegranate a day. Since they could fit so little in a pill, they tried to maximize their chances of beating back the cancer using diversity. If you have two groups of people eating approximately the same amount of fruits and vegetables, but one group ate a relatively low biological diversity diet where they ate tons of really healthy foods, with less variety than smaller servings of a high diversity diet, which group would win in terms of protecting their DNA from free radical damage? The high diversity group. This suggests that smaller amounts of many phytochemicals may have a greater potential to exert beneficial effects than larger amounts of fewer phytochemicals. Same result for inflammation. Greater variety in fruit and vegetable intake is associated with lower inflammation, even if you eat the same number of servings. Same with improving cognitive function, greater variety in fruit and vegetable intake was associated with a better mental status, executive function, attention, and memory function in some cases even after adjustment for total quantity. So, if you have two people eating the same number of servings of healthy foods, the one eating a greater variety may do better. So, the researchers didn't just put in some pomegranate powder, they added some powdered broccoli, too, and some powdered turmeric, and some powdered green tea concentrate. So, a fruit, vegetable, spice, and leaf, but tiny amounts. That's like one floret of broccoli a day, less than an eighth teaspoon a day of turmeric, and about one-sixth of a tea bag worth of green tea. All great plans, but could such tiny amounts actually affect the progression of cancer? Yes. In the group of men with early-stage prostate cancer trying to avoid surgery, the PSA levels rose in the placebo group, and it rose nearly 50%, indicating the cancer continued to flourish. Whereas in the pomegranate broccoli term or green tea food supplement group, the PSAs didn't rise at all, and those with more advanced disease already had surgery irradiation trying to avoid chemo, a 70% greater rise in the placebo group. That was enough to significantly delay some of the more toxic treatments. So significant short-term favorable effects. See, they only had enough money to run the study for six months, because it was a non-commercial endeavor funded by charity. This wasn't some supplement company. In fact, there was no supplement until the investigators dreamed it up from scratch. Of course, now there's a supplement, given the study's extraordinary results, but the only reason the researchers put the foods in pill form was to match it with the placebo. In my mind, what this study should tell cancer patients is to eat curried broccoli with fruit for dessert and sip some green tea. A completely plant-based diet may even shrink the tumor, not just slow it down, but there's no reason we can't do both.


Hi everyone. We're going to talk about the video sequence editor in Blender. Any one of you is using it or has used it? Whoa, we have a lot of people. You're crazy. The video sequence editor was meant or might have been removed in Blender 2.80, but it made it thankfully for better or for worse. So in this presentation, we're going to talk about that, about the good side of the sequence editor, the bad side about any. The recent improvements that happened in the project because it is under active development again, even if it's a little slow. We're going to talk about the future of the sequencer or what it could be at least and finally we'll talk about how it can help it become the tool it's meant to be. I'm Nathan. I founded a small social company called GD Quest, Game Design Quest. We make tutorials with and for free software that we use exclusively. Our mission is to bring people together to become game developers. Anyone has used the Godot game engine here? Yeah, a few persons. Thank you. So we make tutorials. Everything is free and the thing is, so you have a few tutorials like this one, a series that's meant to get you started creating games in 2D in this case, the three you want following. This led me to become an occasional contributor to Blender because we edit all our videos with the video sequencer or our tutorials. We created an add-on that is included in Blender 2.81 called Power Sequencer to help you create videos better. It helps to edit faster and as a result yet I'm now working on the sequencer itself, making small contributions to help push things forward. Now if you've used the sequencer, you should know one thing.   The cursor is always lagging behind. It's also making the UI freeze as soon as you have a little too much to render. The cuts in your footage can provoke micro-freezes as you are playing back. Even if you are using proxies or things like these, the effects are pretty demanding. And finally, the video rendering process is very long. The thing is as an editor, even if you're doing a 3D movie or anything, you need the playback to be smooth so that you can get a sense for the rhythm and the feel that the spectator will have in the end.  It looks like a very old program, the drawing you can see. I'm really talking about the sequence editor area, not the rest of Blender because it got a nice upgrade with 2.80. But the visuals of the sequencer feel behind the rest of Blender, making it feel like it's unfinished or lacks a bit of polish. The sequencer has clunky controls. You know these, the green and pink sequences you can see, are effect sequences. They are unintuitive. They get in the way. They make it hard to use the sequencer. They are confusing in general. Also, basic editing operations that are kind of standard in other video editing programs don't work exactly the same way in the sequencer and are inconsistent between tools, making it harder to use than it could be. The sequencer does not feel part of Blender. It really feels like its own program, a bit separate from the rest. You can add a 3D footage as a scene in the sequencer, but here you have an example of trying to grade a strip that you select using the compositing area and just nothing happens. Instead, you have to use the same functionality that's duplicated in the sequencer and that's specific to strips, applying a curve in this case. Audio tools are really bare bones. That's all the audio tools in the sequence editor. There is no way to preview your audio. There are no effects, no mixer, no cross fades. It's just limited. You have to use something else to do audio editing. I lied because I think that the sequencer is amazing, kind of. It has a lot of potential. First, it's the most stable free and open-source video editing tool that I've used and even commercial software tends to crash. I don't know if anyone has used Sony Vegas or Premiere. I've had lots of issues with them. Can anyone relate? Yes, a few persons. Thank you. The sequencer has crashed on me once or twice with a reproducible bug, but overall I've had a great experience using it. Another thing that's really important is that you can keep editing your projects during playback. So you can playback the video and move handles at the same time. It just works. The sequencer is part of Blender. Okay, there are connections lacking between some areas like the ability to use the node compositor to grade your shots. But it's only one new area to learn, not an entire new program. So as a Blender user, as someone working on a 3D or a 2D movie, this is great because you can use the G shortcut to grab a strip to make it move. You can add 3D scenes as strips as well. So there's some consistency with the rest of Blender and some connection with some other features in the program. It also benefits from Blender. That is, the sequence area is not a complete program, a complete project for developers to make from scratch. Instead, every improvement to the animation tools, for example, the improvements to the user interface in Blender 2.80, all the new file browser that's coming in the next version are all usable with the sequencer. It's not something separate that would take extra maintenance, giving it a lot of potential once again. The sequencer is flexible. If you have a team, if you have a developer in-house, you can use the Python programming language to add new features. You also have existing add-ons that you can use to add features like the ability to, there we go, transform strips directly from the preview. A feature that's lacking, so you can change the opacity of your footage, you can change the position, the scale, the rotation, all sorts of things. Then, I should say that the sequencer is already part of the way there. Of course, it needs improvements, but it already does a lot. It's already there and it's already used by animators, by professionals. So, it has, hopefully, its place in the program. It's been used for storyboarding and annotations by the animation studios, by the Blender animation studios. So, hopefully, the sequencer is here to stay, especially now that we have a maintainer for a very long time that was the problem. There was no one willing to dive into that very old code and make it up to date. But we have someone, even though he's working part-time at the moment, leading the work done by other contributors and helping it move forward. Now, the sequencer lacks one thing. It's lacking a vision. It's lacking some concept, some design goals, some target users that are very specific and help funnel down the development. One problem that we have on the VSC channel, on the online chat, is that you have people coming to request all kinds of features that are specific to the needs of a video editor working on movies, on TV shows, all those kinds of things. And there's not enough people to develop all that, but it would also not necessarily make sense as part of Blender itself because the sequencer is not a video editing suite. There are dedicated free software projects like the Olive editor that definitely and specifically targets professional video editors. That's very promising. There is KDN Live for people editing videos in general. So doing the same thing as part of Blender would not necessarily be meaningful. After all, it's a digital content creation tool. The sequencer is really a sequence view. So right now, as I was saying, it feels like a program of its own, a little separate from the rest. But the graph editor, the file browser and other areas just interact with other parts of Blender. You can use them in conjunction. The sequencer doesn't always feel that way. If you see it as a way to view your Blender project as a set of sequences that you can move back and forward in time and edit, it would make a little more sense, like the NLA editor, nonlinear animation tools. It could be a tool for virtual filmmaking. You have the example of Unity's tools right now. We discussed that with some Blender developers on the chat again. It's nothing set in stone, of course, but it's a possible direction for the tool. There is no tool in the free software world to allow you to just edit, sequence your movies where you can preview, work directly from the 3D scene, jump around your shots by moving forward in the timeline, those kinds of things. And there are some game engines that are doing that right now. The thing is, Blender 2.80 already has the EV rendering engine. That would be a perfect match for those needs. Now, there are some improvements that are being made right now and that are coming in the next versions of Blender. You have improvements to playback and rendering, let's say, in general. The prefetch is the ability for the sequencer to cache and render the frames ahead of time, just like you would see in something like After Effects, for example, so that you can then get smooth playback. So you edit a part of your video and the next frames are already pre-rendered and you can work seamlessly. It works in the memory and on the disk. It's already coming in the next version and will keep being improved moving forward. You have some tweaks being made to improve storyboarding with Blender. So this is the hero movie. You can see that it's using strips in the top right corner. There's a problem with the fact that you can't jump from a scene strip in the sequencer, so you can add some animation as a sequence in Blender, but you can't easily jump back and forth between the 2D view and the sequencer strip. There are improvements coming to the user interface. There are features in Blender that are really powerful in the sequencer. The thing is, they are more confusing than they could be. And we have Peter Fogg, a contributor working with William, who's working on UI and Blender and other contributors, simplifying everything, making it clear what works, when, what options do. So every panel is being remade right now, one by one. You're going to have some improvements to editing. You're going to see the toolbar from the rest of Blender appear with a bit of delay, but it's coming, making the tools much easier to use, much more discoverable. You also have a working progress patch to show thumbnails on the videos, that's also happening, and in general, a variety of quality of life improvements. Now let's talk about the future, a possible future. Again, there is no clear roadmap at the moment, but we have improved user experience as a goal, making it much smoother using the sequencer for the first time, for first time users, and for artists, modernizing the look maybe a little bit, moving the clunky FX trips to modifiers to be consistent with the rest of Blender, making the experience smoother in general. One thing that Richard the maintainer wants to do is a sequencer timeline API. It's getting a bit technical, but the idea is that right now you can't use footage with different frame rates in Blender. You have all kinds of issues with that. The thing is Pixar developed Open Timeline I.O., an interchange format, a data format that you can use to kind of standardize how you handle footage, the position on the board, the length of the strips, and those kinds of things. This would bring quite a few advantages and improvements in the sequencer. For you, the user being able to just put the footage in the sequencer and have it work, but it would also be much easier for developers to contribute. I'm picking up C, working on the sequencer is really hard. You would also have the ability to change the playback speed. Right now we use a hack in add-ons to do that, but you might be able to play at 20% faster, 40% faster, the kinds of things you see in general in video editing programs, and that saves you time editing videos. Now improvements coming to color management, I should say fixes. I don't have a great understanding of that, to be honest, but I saw that some bug that would prevent you from using color management in the sequencer has been fixed recently, and there are people reporting issues that they have, so hopefully this will get better moving forward. Another thing that the maintainer Richard wants is to make these features from a great add-on called the VSC transform part of the sequencer itself. I've heard that there was work being done on widgets to manipulate 2D images, and we could bring that to the sequence editor as well so that you could just move stuff, select stuff from the video preview. Finally, there's always the project to improve performances in the sequencer. When it's coming, I don't know, but at least a fair part of the operations needs to be modified to use all of your computer's power. Here you have a video being rendered in the background. It's using roughly 2 cores, 30% of the CPU power. It's not using the graphics card, and there are improvements that can be made there. Finally, as I was saying, if the idea of pushing the sequencer into the virtual filmmaking direction is taken by the team, by the developers, sequencing movies, being able to preview all the shots from the sequencer using EV could be something for the future. Now, you can help with that whether you are an experienced developer or not because there is a lot of work to do. You can make a difference by helping with code, of course, as Richard himself says, patches are always welcome. You can use C all now. You can develop in Python. Python developers are welcome to add new features to refine some existing features that are made in Python. We need help. Feedback from editors, from people using the sequencer. We are just a handful of people talking every day, every week on the VSC chat. If you are using it, please come talk to us, tell us what are the problems that you encounter so that we can improve these areas. Sometimes it's just a matter of changing how things are presented in the user interface. The feature might be there, and you might just be missing it. Finally, we need help with testing, reporting bugs. People are doing it, of course, but again, as the sequencer is not the most used area in Blender, I think it's not getting as many bug reports and as many fixes as a result as it could. As I was saying, patches are welcome. You can get in touch with us on Blender.Chat slash channel slash VSC. There is a video sequence editor channel there. We have a list of easy tasks for people who want to get started. There is Peter Fogg, Tint Wotin. You can message him on the board. He's maintaining a document with things like these, so you don't have to go through, just jump in the sequencer, jump in the source code, and all of that will help you get started to guide you with the code or whatever. I should add one last thing. It's that the maintainer was busy, so he's a guy who has a full-time job. He's quitting now. He might be working more on the sequencer. At least he's looking forward to doing some more if he can. But with that, I want to say thank you for listening to my rant. One last thing. You see the shameless plug on the screen right now if you want to get in touch, watch tutorials, learn game creation. We do a lot of free code. Finally, I will be there for the duration of the event, so come talk to me anytime. Thank you once again. Bye-bye. Enjoy the conference.


Everybody forced to it ripping 2021 select football hobby three bucks number 11 random team style You can always find these results at lane sports cards calm. Thanks for joining everybody and good luck See what we got The Chiefs aren't a bad team. He got my homes as an option for some color so I can just be tough sometimes man If we get you nice my homes here sensation silver Nick Chubb for the Browns club level Stevenson for the Patriots on the rookie and a Mac Jones Premier level Mac Jones club level Bateman try color premiere level for the uh, Ravens Number 88 of 199 a field level silver Patrick Mahomes Ty Johnson Silver concourse fry moot rookie Steelers John Elway So we got gold or tie-dye the Justin Fields concourse there gold concourse Eagles colors. Maybe it's a dark green. Yeah, it's Eagles Nice Miles Sanders concourse gold your birds 10 out of 10 on the bookend. Oh, there's some damage there Right there Gonna send an empty boxer wrapper to the eagle spot.  You got silver concourse Jags DJ shark trail Williams Jacob Harris try color concourse rookie for the Rams to 18 of 249 and bucks tie-dye Otto Devin White nice hit for the bucks here 25 out of 25 Bateman Premier level Raji Harris Jacob Harris Rams again here 36 of 199 rookie Jersey Otto Joe Mixon Silver snapshots Rottlesberger for the Steelers silver Premier level Brandon Cooks Texans Tri-color club level Titans Desmond Patrick rookie 63 of 149 a silver club level Tyron Matthew Chiefs Smith Mercedz These mills Justin Fields a Tylenwallis concourse silver for the Ravens Had Frymuth Smith Michael Pittman jr. 50 of 75 Colt's Jersey card. I guess that's the only way to go, right? Pull a 101 this break now Premier level silver. Whoops The Titans Desmond Patrick Dan Alvin Camara maroon concourse Calvin Ridley Falcons that one's 126 of 149 The silver concourse Peyton Manning Colts Oh, it's pre-season tonight. I didn't even know just ready for the regular season Wilson concourse got silver sensations TJ Watt Steelers called level silver Marlon Humphrey for the uh Ravens Tick-tock link is in the bio for you guys get a link is in the bio got a full break schedule there We break seven days a week group breaks and personals Tri-color Jalen Darden Bucking Ears Premier level 179 of 199 silver field level Derek Gore rookie for the Chiefs. It's Patrick Silver Stafford Rams concourse tie-dye after the Javante tie-dye Texans Quantity of mills Concourse tie-dye Texans it is David Johnson Texans number 19 to 25 on that one silver premier level Jim Kelly for the bills Sermon, there's a mill selection silver concourse Darden for the Bucking Ears Javante Premier level Hey, thanks for the fire and the rose Appreciate it guys moose and brandon Justin Fields concourse red there you go bears 57 and 99 and a can and a long loose tie-dye auto for the uh for the Vikings 15 of 25 tie-dye die cut Get that a fields mag for you bears trade Nixon concourse maroon quity pay Colts rookie 103 of 149 Teres Marshall Jr silver Zach Wilson Premier level and Anthony Schwartz 16 of 75 rookie jersey auto for Cleveland Elijah Vera Tucker Click the link in the bio if you'd like to join some breaks I could parse in silver snapshots for the Cardinals deandre Hawkins Website link is in the bio premier level silver rookie chiefs Derek Gore the Lyme green Derek Henry for the Titans Premier level 43 of 49 silver club level for the Bengals jamar chaser's a few Really tiny like dimples in the top right look at a boxing wrapper for the Bengals now More Adams Wilson only phenomenon the silver concourse Uh, really for the Falcons Malu Ellinger 2 2 Atwell 11 and 99 Rams jersey card and in brandon And in brandon got it silver premier level Seahawks Dwayne Eskridge I don't see him much these days You gotta baby He was sleeping at the shop yesterday He was snoozing the whole time. He was here. I was like go figure One place you think you'd be awake and like looking around at stuff. He's just knocked out You got zack wilson 7 of 99 on the rookie jersey auto jets big hit there. Congrats new york jets 7 of 99 That mag for your jets All break prices are different. This one was random team three box select hobby. It was a 144 99 silver snapshots tom brady bucks Silver premier level Jalen waddle dolphins nice waddle Silver phenomenon bills josh allen silver club level panthers jibba hovered Chuba Brady and the uh club level tri-color for the buccaneers 57 of 149 he's back you guys he's back Cub level silver titans aj brown got remandre stevensson Would not like the sound of that Silver concourse dealers troi paul amalu. That was some loud thunder. Kyle pits premier level tri-color for the falcons now Uh 128 of 199 silver premier level digs for the bills Yeah, that's still run of the business brandon. It's crazy Congrats on your second though Concourse silver for the colds of sam ellinger Tommy tremble illegal Ervin smith a jr 23 or 49 jersey card for the vikings Yeah, silver premier level on was rike for the lions And thanks mason appreciate it man Make sure you guys throw us a follow if you're not a follower already and the link for the website is in the bio Group breaks in personal seven days a week. There's a chase. Is that wilson purple concourse for the jets jets crushed at 27 to 75 Andrew g with the jets Beautiful card there man 27 to 75 again This actually looks pretty good for a concourse the concourses have been pretty tough on centering this year so far Looks pretty good might not be perfect, but Yeah, that's a nice one right there silver concourse derrick gorge chiefs and a jamar chase premier level tie-dye for the cowboys premier level rookie simi fahoko 23 to 25 for the cowboys kevin byard 86 of 99 titans auto Got tricolor zack wilson now figures 99 98 and 249 for the jets Crazy man andrew g congrats on the break Silver field level calvin joseph cowboys kyle trask got a future franchise is gold. It looks like yep Future franchise is gold. It's gonna be number to 10 Dolphins two or waddle would be my guess it is jail in a waddle. That is nasty looking Look at that thing Congrats dolphins here five out of 10 Future franchise gold Short printed insert already you got the gold on it too.  We'll do a uh a recap of the break there Tight for me again guys tiktok link is in the bio. Make sure you follow us Breaking seven these a week We had relic here viking servicemen jr. Colts michael pittman jr. Rams 2 2 at well autos now tie-dye kenny nwangu vikings tie-dye devin white bucks Titans kevin byard jersey auto jacob harris rams and anthony schwarz for the browns Gold future franchise dolphins jail in a waddle five out of 10 It's a nice zack will since your tricolor concourse jets 98 of 249 purple concourse to jet zack wilson 27 to 75 and rookie jersey auto now 7 of 99 out of a three boxer that is incredible for the jets and concourse red for the bears jesson fields 57 of 99 that'll do it. Thanks again everybody another three boxer coming up next


So in the previous video we looked at the orbit of a set. Now we're going to look at the stabilizer. Again I have my set G and my group G. It consists of a set and a group operation and I have my arbitrary set. We're going to act on that. So the stabilizer I'm going to take an element of A and I'm going to define the stabilizer which is a set. It's going to turn out to be a subset of this and I'm going to define this on my element A that I chose from A as all the G's in my G set such that G acting on A just gives me A back. So take the element of A and I look at all my elements of my G set and I see which one if I act on this A is going to give me just the A back. And I claim that this is a group. It's not only a set that under this operation that this is a group and it is a subgroup of G. And to show that it's a subgroup of G, well it is a subset of G because is this going to be some of the elements of G. So we're going to have associativity. Let's look at closure. For us to have closure let's have G1 and we have G2 and we make them an element of the stabilizer of A here in G. And so what we need to show now is that if I take G1 and I compose it with G2 that that is still an element of this stabilizer of A so that I must show this. Now to show this what I really want to what I really need to show then is that G1 composed with G2 under this group operation dot A must still be A. So if that is so then I've shown that there is closure. Now let's assume to the contrary that it's not like that that it's not like that. Well by the first property of group actions I can write three write this quite legally as G.1 and G.2 acting on A and I'm suggesting still that that is then not equal to A. But G2 is an element of GA. So by this property G2 dot A that must just be A. So I'm left here with G1 acting on A and I'm still saying that that's not A. G1 is an element of the stabilizer of A. So by the way that I've defined it this is just A so A does not equal A that's a contradiction. In other words this initial assumption that we did you know assuming to the contrary that it's not as false and this is so. So if G1 and G2 is an element of the stabilizer of A then the composition under the group binary operation is then still an element. So we have closure. Let's see if we have an identity element. Well we know that by the second property of group actions that E dot A equals A and if that just follows the definition of what we have there by the stabilizer therefore E must be the identity element must be an element of the stabilizer of A. Lastly does every element that falls in May does every element have its inverse. So I'm saying if G dot A equals A I need to show that show that G inverse dot A equals A. So the G inverse dot A equals A. So what can we do here? If we have G dot A if we have let's have a look if we have we can just rewrite this as A equals G dot A. A equals G dot A and let's I need to show this G inverse A equals A. So let's take G inverse A and I'm just going to rewrite this instead of A I'm going to use that. So I'm saying G inverse dot G dot A and by the second property by the second by the first property of group actions I can rewrite this as G inverse G acting on A. We've just shown that you know or by the properties by that binary operation that's just E that is just E dot A and E dot A by is just that is just equal to A. So we have shown you very cleverly that G inverse dot A equals A and that obeys the properties that we set the definition that we set for the stabilizer. In other words we have closure, we have the associative property, we have an identity element and we have that for every element in this stabilizer of A we have that the inverse is also there. So indeed we have shown that the stabilizer of A is that is a subgroup that is a subgroup of G. So remember we just think we take a specific A and then we construct the stabilizer that's all the G's that you know that will have that will lead to this property where that element of the G said X on A that we still that we still get A so every A might have a different stabilizer, a difference stabilizer and then this according to the group action if I take all these elements and I apply that binary operation it is still a group and therefore a subgroup of G.


Unicam is a web-based video platform that synchronizes with Google Drive and is available for all DCU students allowing them to create videos from their own devices such as their laptops or their mobile phones. To use Unicam simply go to the website at dcu.uni.cam and you'll be prompted to log in with your Google account which you can do by clicking the green Google button. You'll be asked to enter in your DCU credentials so proceed through each of the screens to do that. After signing in you'll be brought to the Unicam homepage the third button allows you to upload a video file you've already recorded and the first button on the left allows you to create your first video recording directly in Unicam so click that. In the window that appears you'll have to select your audio and video inputs but most of these should be recognized automatically. In this case my microphone and my camera are already recognized and a name has also been entered for me so if I'm happy with that setup I just click next and now I'm actually into the Unicam recording screen so to commence recording I just simply navigate to the top menu bar and click the circular red record button. The red button will start pulsating slowly so that means that I am recording at present so I can continue to speak directly into my device the camera is capturing me the microphone is capturing me and I can continue with my video presentation or narration and when I'm ready to finish I just simply click the circular red button again to stop the recording the video will now start processing I can then see that the video has recorded and I can play it back by clicking the play button or I can delete it by clicking the delete button over on the right or indeed I can click the back arrow to go back to my home screen where I click the hamburger menu and my sessions in the top left corner of the screen and I can see there that my recording is at the top of the list the video has automatically been stored in Google Drive so to access it I simply open a new tab and go to Google Drive in my Google Drive I'll find a Unicam folder and I can see at the top of the list is a video from Unicam that I modified just a few minutes ago and if I want to share this for example if I want to submit it as part of an assignment to loop I just need to change the sharing settings so by right clicking on the video in question I click share advanced and in the access panel I click change and switch it to on anyone with the link and then click save it then means that anyone with whom I share this link will be able to view the video so highlighting the link to share and pressing control and c on my keyboard means that it is copied so then I can go to loop and paste it into the assignment submission or paste it into a discussion forum email it to somebody or paste it in my loop reflect e portfolio whatever is required of me


Hello friends welcome back to the channel in today's video we've got up to 10 Pokemon that you're going to be able to hunt super easy and you'll copy your Pokemon Scarlet and Violet from one location we're going to cover all the details in today's video but before we get into the video please subscribe to the channel remember you can always unsubscribe later if you would like to so yesterday we are showcasing another location where you're going to be able to hunt multiple different Pokemon in their shiny form super easy as always got to give a big shout out to Sukuro Gaming's who actually discovered this location which we can showcase today which hopefully you can take into your own games and have a lot of success shiny hunting with or in game you are going to want to come onto your map and you're going to want to head right up and north into this area which is right next to the ground blind shrine and you're going to want to come to this area so if you've got the shrine unlocked then you can just head straight here and then follow my directions to where we're going to be going where this whole method kind of centers around so once you're here you want to just head up to this area up onto the top of this cliff here and it's not right on top of here but you'll see a little ledge to the side of you to the left and that is the ledge that you're going to want to hop up on and this is where we're going to base ourselves for this whole method so this area here you can see this is the view you've got a good view of the terrain the top of the cliff in front of you and you're going to be able to set up your picnic here as well that's a big thing so you're going to be able to set your picnic up and down which is obviously one of the big things that we're going to need to do throughout this method so here we are and i'll just bring it up on the map once again so you know exactly where we are in regards to everything and like i said at the start of the video this location you can hunt up to 10 different shiny pokemon super easy so the first pokemon that we are going to cover today is going to be toad school and toad screw and before we start any shiny hunt of course make sure that you save your game have auto saves off because if you are creating a sandwich and you are using herbomistica you don't want to waste those if you're not successful in your first hunt you're going to want to come into your picnic and set up a sandwich as always i will put an overlay on the screen now giving you some examples of how you can get the ingredients to give you that encounter power level three and the sparkling power level three for each individual type that we'll be looking for in these games and the sandwich recipe list will be listed in the description as well so just grab it and use it because it is quite useful for mixing and matching a bunch of the herbomistica if you've got different varieties for this one we can use two sweet herbomisticas and this should give us the exact sparkling power and encounter power that we need as you can see we've got that sparkling and encounter power level three for ground types we've got the added bonus of the title part as well but these are the sandwich powers that you're going to need for this first example and like i say the ingredients recipe list will be in the description if you want to refer to that and of course once you have done the sandwich the first thing you're going to want to note is that you've got 30 minutes in total to take advantage of the sandwich powers and where we are located you are going to just want to view the toteschool and toteschool that come in in this location there's going to be about three families in total that will come in so about 15 in total sometimes it does take a little while for the third family to come in but if you don't want to wait for it then you can just set up your picnic once again and it is just setting it up despawning everything on the field that's currently there that isn't a shiny and then you want to just take your picnic down once again and then the spawns should just pop back in on to the field and as you can see there there's three families there and this is what you will repeat over and over again until the shiny does spawn in and it's a super easy shiny to go for for this one very little effort involved and you're going to be looking out for a white toteschool that is the shiny form i'll put them on the screen now for you and then the toteschool is going to be a very vibrant pink purple color very easy to spot so this one isn't going to be too hard you're not going to have to concentrate too much on it and like i say you're going to just repeat this method of setting your picnic up despawning anything that's not a shiny and then taking your picnic down for the pokemon to spawn back in and hopefully the shiny won't take too long for you to get and of course if you don't get the shiny if you're unlucky on the first 30 minutes with your sparkling powers then you can just reset your game and use the same sandwich recipe once again and repeat the process for another 30 minutes so you're not wasting resources hence the reason why it's very important before you start any of these shiny hunts to just save your game just in case you are a little bit unlucky with not getting the shiny the first time through when you set your sandwich powers up and after a little while here we go we eventually get these shiny toteschool so we get the pre-evolution here but just make sure when you do get the shiny to save your game first of all so in case you have any mishaps and the shiny gets away then at least you can say reset your game and come back into it and you're going to be able to get the shiny no problem at all also having a false swipe user in your party is advisable just to get it down to one hp and then it gives you a better chance to use some of these more special pokeballs to catch the shinies in and one you've called that toteschool if you want to evolve it into toteschool the evolution then all you need to do is use one rare candy and then this should be enough because it evolves at level 30 to get this pink shiny which is one of the nicest shinies i think in the newest games so the next shiny that we're going to go for is sudo wudo it is a rock type you want to set up your sparkling and encounter power for rock type pokemon and if you can set your picnic up and get these powers set up in the rain this is going to be the easiest shiny hunt for you because the sudo wudo in the rain will despawn themselves as you can see here as long as it's raining they will run out of the field of focus and more will spawn in giving you better chances of the shiny coming in very quickly meaning that you don't need to set your picnic up and down of course rain is pretty random as a weather so it's just dependent if you can get the rain set up in this area and once you do it shouldn't be too long for you to get the shiny sudo wudo in your game next one is going to be an electric sparkling and encounter power and you're going to get raichu spawns in this location with the sandwich powers active and again it's just going to be a case of just setting your picnic up and down here until the shiny does spawn in the nice thing about raichu is there are lots of spawns coming in every time you set up and take down your picnic next one is going to be for fighting type and bug type heracross so fighting type sandwich powers for heracross for the sparkling power and again a little bit like raichu you're going to get lots of spawns in for this pokemon next one is going to be for bramble gas the ghost type sandwich powers for encounter and sparkling power are advisable here again just setting up and taking down your picnic to spawn in new pokemon until the shiny does spawn in next one is a sparkling and encounter power for normal type and that's going to be dealing and it's evolution that you're going to get spawning in in these locations again a little bit like the toteschool and toteschool going to be in families of three and normally about 15 at a time so you just want to set up your picnic and then take it down again to respawn the pokemon in this area and you can use your camera and then zoom function if you'd like to in game to get a closer look at the flower which would be the big indicator for the dealing in particular being a shiny next one is going to be poison type sandwich for encounter power and sparkling power for fungus and moongus in this area so once you do set up at just like every other example in this video you're going to just get these families of three coming in about 15 at a time and again you probably want to use your zoom function on this one as well just to be able to kind of spot the fungus as they are rather small but purple is the color that you're looking for not the regular red next one is dark type sandwich with sparkling power and encounter power for mass chief and mabo staff and they are going to appear again in family groups so you'll get the evolution and the prevolutions here again you can use the zoom function not really necessary but shinies for these ones easy to spot and you want to just repeat the process over until you get the shiny appearing now the next one you're going to have to wait until it is night time set up a flying encounter and sparkling power level three for this pokemon and that's it's going to be murkrow and honchkrow and very easy shinies to spot bright pink compared to their regular kind of dark blue colors so easy to spot like i say you might want to use the camera function if you want not really necessary though but it has to be at night time when you set your sandwich powers up for these pokemon to spawn in just make sure it's night time in the game if it's not then you can just close your game down put your clock forward 30 minutes and then set your sound next one is going to be a steel encounter and sparkling power and this is going to get you for stress the bug and steel type pokemon again a very easy shiny to spot here it is going to be a gold color rather than the kind of steel and red color that it is in its regular form again just take down your picnic set it up again you're going to get a bunch of these spawning in at a time so it should be quite an easy shiny for you to get and as you can see when it does come in make sure you save your game when you do get the shiny because this pokemon can explode like i'm going to show you an example here of forest stress when you're trying to catch it one of its moves is explosion so if you don't save before coming in and encountering forest stress and it does explode on you then you've lost the shiny and you don't really want that to happen so more important than any of the other ones make sure you do save before you go in and get this shiny because then you can just reset your game come back into it and encounter it again and give yourself another shot at getting this shiny and not losing it but a really nice shiny though nonetheless and this generation 2 pokemon kind of forgotten about but also a nice one to go after and hunt of course and that is every single shiny that we're going to cover in this location if you have tried this location for yourself and you've got other pokemon by setting up other different types of sandwich please let me know down in the comment section below but a great location where you're going to be able to get a lot of shiny pokemon really easy just in this one location i hope you found today's guide useful good luck shiny hunting if you have found it useful please drop a like on the video it does massively help and if you're new to the channel make sure you do subscribe so you don't miss any more shiny hunting videos that we do as well as the other scholar and violet coverage that we constantly put out on the channel thank you for tuning in have a great rest of your day and i will see you all in another video very soon so until i have friends take care of yourselves and bye bye


Hi, my name is Shaw Selby. I'm an explorer with the National Geographic Society and founder of the Conservation Technology Development Lab, Conservify. For more than a decade, I have been researching technology innovations for conservation. It is through that work that I've been helping to advise XPRIZE on what I believe will be one of their most environmentally impactful challenges to date. Rainforests across the globe are facing unprecedented threats. These ecosystems are critically important to the livelihoods of Indigenous communities. They serve as habitat to a significant portion of terrestrial biodiversity and play an important role in global climate regulation. The audience here at the Earth Optimism Summit knows this better than most, but the need to better understand and protect this environment has never been more urgent. Fortunately, we live in a time where we have the ability to build better tools to help us understand and protect our planet. This is the promise of conservation technology, where we can leverage the remarkable speed of technological innovation to design something that can monitor and collect data at a frequency in fidelity that was never before possible. These tools not only make our jobs easier, but they can fundamentally change the types of questions that we can ask. When we design the solutions with this as the core goal, we can create some amazing and accessible ideas. In many ways, places like the Amazon have reached a critical turning point with respect to deforestation, wildlife degradation, and climate change. The entire world watched as the forests burned last year, caused mostly by human activity and unsustainable agri-business. We are losing pristine rainforests and the living things within them before even getting the opportunity to document and study them. The scientists and conservationists watching virtually today do an incredible job at pushing that science forward, but we're losing things at a faster rate than we can support. But it doesn't have to be that way. XPRIZE aims to catalyze the development of better solutions through their 10 million dollar rainforest XPRIZE. That cleans our air, purifies our water, holds many of the important solutions to tomorrow's problems. The future of humanity is at stake. How can we monitor the tropical forest? We need your help to find a better way to understand and document the biodiversity in our rainforests. Please visit rainforest.express.org to find out more and get involved. The teams that will find a solution to this issue will be made up of a diverse group of experts, engineers, scientists, community members, and more.  Come join us to learn more about it.


We are still on earning per share and here we are going to talk about conversion of potential shares into the ordinary shares and how they affect on the earning per share. Silk company has 8.5 million ordinary shares on January 1st, 2018 and during 2018 it did not issue any ordinary share. So, in the beginning you have 8.5 million shares. In addition to these shares, silk company also had the following convertable loans in issue in 2018. You have done convertable bonds or convertable debenture, whatever you have done, I have kept these two, it is 12% and it is 15%. Here 12% loan which is convertable 4 years time at the rate of 1 share per 10 rupees of loan. Note that when we talk about conversion, there is no time frame in this. We assume that it has been converted in the beginning of the year, it is written that you have to convert it within 4 years but because it has been issued, that is why we have to assume for diluted earning per share that it has been converted in the beginning. Now, following one of the 15 shares, you have 2 years time but the rate again is 1 share, in exchange of 16 rupees, you have to give 1 share, in the first case you have to give 1 share in exchange of 10 rupees and in the second case you have to give 1 share in exchange of 16 rupees. Following also relevant, that is the earning of 2018 is 10.2 million and the income tax rate is 35%. Now, compute the basic earning per share, let us see the basic earning per share. For example, earning is number of share outstanding, 10.2 million divided by 8.5 so it comes to 1.2. Now, let us see first of all, what will be the impact of 12% loan in our earning and numbers. Interest saved, if you take 12% of that loan of 2.5 million, that is 300,000 and from this, if you minus the tax then the balance is saved, you have 195. Remember that when you are taking out the interest from there, then you will have to get the tax. That is why the income you are adding, you have to get the net of tax.  You see, 10 million was in the beginning and because of this, the saving you got is 195. So total earning has become your 10.395,000 and the number of shares has become 255. If you are issuing one share in exchange for every 10 rupees, then the number of shares will become 250 and the total number of shares will be 8.75 million and the earning per share will be 1.8 million. Now, see, there was 1.2 in the basics and what has been deleted is that it has become 1.8 million. So it means our earning has deleted and that should be reported in the balance sheet, sorry, in the income statement, footnote. Now, if we look at the 15% bond, then you have on 15% on 3 lakhs, 300,000 and if you minus the tax, then it becomes 292.500. And the number of shares you have to issue on 16 rupees, so if you divide 3 million from 16, then it becomes 187.5. Now, this is incremental. So, see in incremental, the rate that you have issued, the earning per share has come out to be 1.5 stick, whereas the basic is 1.2. So, in this case, earning increased. So that is anti-dialuted and that should not be recorded and that should not be reported. Only the diluted earning per share is supposed to be recorded. If you look at the total, the total earning is 292.500 plus 10,495.500. Divide the number of shares, so that becomes 1.3. Again, it is anti-dialuted because 1.2 and 1.3. So, anti-dialuted is not supposed to be recorded. Thank you very much.