Hey Psych2Goers, welcome back and thank you so much for your support. Do you think everyone who is depressed acts the same? Depression is a serious medical illness that can last for long periods of time and negatively affect how you feel, the way you think, and how you act. It can cause you to hold on to negative thought patterns, which lead to habits that can worsen your overall mood and well-being. So to help you become more aware of how your depression can worsen, here are six signs your depression is getting worse. Number one, extreme loneliness. How often do you feel lonely? While it's normal for everyone to feel lonely once in a while, it can be a sign that your depression is getting worse if you notice this feeling resurfacing more and more often. On top of this, you may also be overcome with a feeling of irreversibility that comes with this loneliness. You might feel that getting too close to anyone in the future is both hopeless and impossible. In the end, this type of loneliness caused by a worsening depression can lead to a desire to further isolate yourself from others. Number two, you're not sleeping. Have you noticed changes in your sleep quantity and quality? Changes in your sleep pattern can be an indicator of worsening depression. This includes both insomnia and excessive sleeping. Depression can affect your sleeping patterns because of the impact that it has on your energy levels and overall mood. The cycle of having a lack of sleep and worsening depression is extremely difficult to break because of the self-perpetuating effect these two behaviors have. As reported by the Sleep Foundation, it can end up taking a heavy toll on your overall well-being, making it one of the biggest signs to look for when diagnosing worsening depression. Number three, social withdrawal. When was the last time you enjoyed some time with your family or friends? When depression gets worse, you may find it more and more challenging to enjoy socializing with others. As we've mentioned, depression can be very hard to deal with because of how each of the symptoms can feed off of other symptoms. Social withdrawal is caused and promoted by other symptoms of depression, including low energy levels, emotional numbness and feelings of guilt and worthlessness. So while it's okay and quite normal to spend time alone, it's also important to understand the difference between being alone and feeling lonely, as the latter can very easily negatively impact your mood and worsen your depression. Number four, feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Do you often think about the past and the choices you've made back then? Since depression can make it hard for you to see the positives about yourself, your self-esteem may end up taking a huge dip. In these moments, you might find yourself constantly thinking about the past and ruminating over situations where you made a mistake or were in the wrong. This type of thinking can end up worsening your feelings of guilt and worthlessness, which can lead to habits of social withdrawal and create a difficult cycle that negatively impacts your depression. Number five, you feel numb. Have you recently lost interest in things that you used to enjoy? Psychology Today reports that this can be attributed to worsening depression, as it's known to not only intensify negative emotions, but also make you feel numb about the things that you used to love. This feeling of numbness can make it very difficult to find any motivation to do things like exercise, socialize, or any other activity that you may have enjoyed in the past. Additionally, it may also make it difficult to find the energy to do essential tasks, such as cooking meals or working. And number six, your eating patterns have changed drastically.  A drastic change in eating patterns might suggest worsening depression. According to Susan Albers, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Cleveland Clinic, people who are suffering from worsening depression will either return to food to try to lift their mood up and cope with difficult feelings or be too exhausted to prepare a meal for themselves and eat. Both situations can lead to poor eating habits, which may heavily impact your mood and create a negative cycle that fuels your depression. Albers recommends connecting with other people to avoid isolating too much, as others may be able to help support you and help you break out of these cycles. So did you find this video helpful? Let us know in the comments below. Be sure to like and share this video with others who might benefit from it, and don't forget to subscribe and hit the notification bell icon to get notified whenever Psych2Go posts a new video. The references and studies used in this video are added in the description below. Thanks so much for watching and we'll see you next time.


is Avishar Patel and he will tell us about strange meta. So please go ahead. I think that you can also see us in the screen, okay? Great. Yeah, looks good. All right, so thanks for inviting me and I'll be speaking about a body of work which has led to what we would like to consider as a universal theory of strange metal behavior from which arises from spatially random interactions. So this is just a quick recap of strange metals. I suppose a lot of people are already familiar with strange metals, but what they are is that there are several two-dimensional or layered materials which have strongly correlated electrons and they are displaying their phase diagrams, compressible metallic phases that are unusual and they are unusual in the sense that unlike land of Fermi liquids, they have electrical resistivity whose temperature-dependent scales linearly with temperature as opposed to T square and this often occurs near some kind of quantum critical point. The exact type of quantum critical point differs between different materials, but there's usually evidence that there is approximate quantum criticality to strange metal behavior. So in the T-linear resistivity in and of itself is not that unusual because one definitely can find it at high temperatures where phonons are activated so above some debi or block reconnaissance scales, but what is very interesting about this and these strange metals is that this T-linear resistivity extends down to very low temperatures. So for example, there's this result on NDLSCO cuprits where the superconductivity suppressed by magnetic fields and the T-linear resistivity extends down to temperatures below 10 Kelvin where the phonons are certainly not playing a role and there's also this very beautiful experiment from last year on magic angle twisted bilayer graphene where again the linear T-linear scaling of the temperature dependence of the resistivity can extend down to temperatures that are like 40 millikelvin where there are no phonons and this T-linear behavior and the resistivity is often accompanied by other signs of strong interactions like a T log T specific heat which implies a strong temperature dependent to normalization of the quasi-particle effective mass. So this low temperature T-linear behavior is definitely a signature of strong interactions. So since this is a strongly interacting metal and not a land of Fermi liquid, what is usually done when it theories is to consider a Fermi surface coupled to coupled to some bosonic mode that can mediate strong interactions between electrons. So such a bosonic mode is inevitably gapless at low energies and there's no screening and that that bosonic mode comes from critical fluctuations of order parameter near a quantum critical point. So you couple your electrons to that bosonic mode and there's a very old canonical theory, I think was first pointed out by Patrick Lee in 1989 that if you just do self-consistent early Ashburg equations for the fermion and the boson propagators in two special dimensions, one will find that you get a fermion self-energy that's omega to the two-third which destroys quasi-particle peak in the spectral function and you have a metal which is without quasi-particles which is a non-firmly liquid. But you know if from the point of T linear resistivity this theory is rather useless because what happens is that it's a translationally invariant clean system and because of that there's a conserved total momentum and you heard of a finite charge density so you cannot there's no way there's not a compensated metal you just have one fermi surface at finite charge density so you can't excite currents without exciting momentum and because you can't relax momentum that means you can't relax currents and you get you get an infinite DC conductivity up to you know like vegan clap processes that would occur if you put it on a lattice which would give a T square resistivity at best so there's no way you can get T linear resistivity out of this. So in order to get you know this pretty large T linear resistivity down to very low temperatures you need to be able to relax momentum and the only reasonable way you can do that is to consider the effects of disorder and impurities in the in your system and that can cause momentum non-conserving collisions and relax momentum. So one can naively try to add disorder to this theory of the non-firmly liquid metal the simplest thing to do is just add a random potential term for the fermions and if you do this that changes the low energy structure of the fermions green function and because of that if you do your Eliashberg theory again you get a different kind of land-out damping for the boson you get z equals 2 boson with this diffusive propagator instead of z equals 3 and then you get a different kind of fermions self-energy in two dimensions which is not omega to the two-third but it's a less violent omega log omega frequency dependence plus of course a constant that comes just from the random potential itself and this this omega log omega fermion self-energy leads to a quasi-particle decay rate that's that scales as energy so you if you do this calculation finite temperature you find that it scales as temperature and just this this omega log omega self-energy also produces this t log t specific heat however from the point of view of transport you know what what happens is that your fermion boson interactions the fermion scatter of bosons that that are mostly close to zero momentum because the boson propagator is pq at near q equals zero and those are for momentum conserving forward scattering processes that don't relax any current or momentum and you don't so therefore the this fermion boson interaction doesn't give a transport scattering rate that's linear in temperature even though you have a quasi-particle decay rate that's linear in temperature so we need we need something more than just you know just this this very naive treatment of disorder in the problem and one way to well what we figured out is that you know having just potential disorder is not enough and actually in in your material and whatever disorder is intrinsic to it will also affect or the interactions between between electrons so one can there are like stm measurements on on q-prates which show that like the superconducting gap can vary quite dramatically between between different regions in space and that that that is sort of evidence that the interactions that lead to superconductivity are also varying quite dramatically so that's the disorder in the interactions and one can also think of this from a hover type model that you have a t and a u a hopping and a hovered u and if you have disorder in your hopping then that that leads to disorder in the spin-spin exchange coupling that's derived in second order perturbation theory so instead of t square over u now you have t plus delta t square over u and that leads to delta j and delta j is delta t over t so one one that that you can have a random exchange interaction that way and if you decompose that with the hovered stratomics transformation you get a random boson mass but you can also rescale your bosonic fields in a spatially dependent way and transform that random mass disorder in the boson to actually a random a disorder a random coupling between a random yukawa coupling between the the fermions and the bosons and this in in this this theory this this leads to considering a random g prime shift in in the uniform yukawa coupling so take the same theory as before but now we add this this spatially random yukawa coupling and so if we do that we can again do our ali ashberg theory and compute compute the fermion self-energy in two spatial dimensions and again it's omega log omega but now there are two sources of omega log omega there there's one that comes from the that's the previous one which comes from the g interactions and now there's also the the randomness in the g interactions gives another omega log omega term so basically the coefficient of omega log omega is affected by the randomness in the interactions and boson is still still got this diffusive form which is q square plus mod omega so this this looks very similar to what we just had with only potential disorder but for transport this this random interaction this this randomness in the yukawa coupling actually makes a huge difference so if we you know try to compute the conductivity within within perturbation theory people it's compute conductivity by resumming self-energy and and vertex corrections to the to the current current correlator so they're usually just these these four diagrams with the self-energy and the the ladder diagram and then these two aslam as larkin diagrams so what one finds is that you know the the g interaction it continues to just induce forward scattering between fermions and bosons and therefore it it just cancels the most singular contribution just cancels between between the self-energy and the simple vertex correction and what but the g prime interaction is not forward scattering anymore because but it's disordered so you can actually have large angle and momentum relaxing scattering and yeah so then what happens is that the g prime interaction doesn't cancel between self-energy and vertex corrections and therefore you get a transport scattering rate that that is similar to uh it just comes from from the self-energy contribution and while these aslam as our larkin diagrams in in the limit of life's furby energy they only they almost cancel each other and you know they only produce a scattering rate that's energy square over the fermi energy so that's not not important for for the most singular piece so now you do now have a t-linear piece that comes from comes from the g prime interaction doesn't cancel with vertex corrections in the transport scattering rate so one gets a transport scattering rate which is a residual resistivity which just is just determined by the potential disorder it's just v square and then we have this this correction which is linear in energy so that would be linear in temperature you know you know finite t calculation and that's g prime square times t so yeah at at low temperatures as as t goes to zero this this g prime square t term is smaller smaller than than the residual piece which is like what you you could see like this twisted bilayer graphene experiments for instance and you know one can also compute ac conductivity at finite frequency and then there is this mass renormalization in optical conductivity which has this this log form which is also in there there is also experimental evidence for this that's a recent paper by Antoine Georgian and company on on this thing so yeah that's basically it Aviska, sorry there is a question in the chat from Pierce Goleman who is asking if the disorder in g prime is also giving a residual scattering rate? Yeah not not within not within this Eliasberg calculation and you know this Eliasberg calculation can also be formally justified by a large n syk type construction which I haven't invoked just to keep things simple but it's there in the papers but within within the scope of this calculation it doesn't generate a residual piece but if you are not using that that large n construction it there it will I mean there will be higher order diagrams which generate some residual contribution I think so you'll always have some some residual residual resistivity plus linear t correction. Well can you hear me I wonder that's a kind of self-serving result though is there any way of measuring the g prime disorder is there any way the experimentalist who improved their sample and brings the residual resistivity down to a tiny amount can can still say that you know I mean it looks to me as if you can always say well you've got the most wonderful sample you've ever made with a tiny residual resistivity but I still declare to you that it's disorder that's driving your resistance linear resistivity how can you test your idea? Yeah I mean there are you know there are different ways of inducing disorder in experimental samples I think the most common way is irradiation and that that creates a lot of residual resistivity but one would have to let me give you an example. Serium Cobalt indium-5 it has a linear resistivity linear rise is probably 100 times maybe even 150 times larger than residual resistivity can one then still boldly go and say well I still think you've got disordered coupling to your critical bosons? Yeah I would I would think that's the case I do when these these two can have they're not they're not the same thing they're they're right so how can I test that hypothesis that it's coming from disordered coupling to critical bosons? I mean one thing that critical bosons do is well they can condense it you could have a phase transition so that will happen even if they're ordered even if the coupling is ordered but I would like to know yes how to quantify the randomness in the boson coupling in an experiment? Yeah so yeah I was just going to say that if you know that you do have the randomness in a coupling that when you do have a phase transition to the ordering phase like all parts of the sample may not order at the same time so you could have some emulsion of of ordered phases and disordered phases if you could see something like that. Is the hypothesis falsifiable? Sorry Pirs to interrupt you but I mean from the formal it's just showing the residual resistivity is the coupling V and the slope is the randomness in the coupling. Thank you Natasha I've understood that perfectly but what I want to know is whether this hypothesis is falsifiable by experiment whether it's always going to be something that you can claim is the case. I don't have a complete answer to that question I was maybe if you use there is absolutely no evidence of any inhomogeneity at all near a phase transition like this it just looked the sample just if you take zoom in with STM or whatever and the sample looks exactly the same you know exactly the same phase at all points in the sample then there's no like you're not having any kind of variation in the order parameter close to a phase transition then yeah then maybe then this then this theory doesn't apply thank you so maybe we can let just a wish card conclude if you'd still want to say something otherwise there are other questions here oh no I think that yeah that was that was okay okay okay okay thanks very much so maybe we thank you first sorry and let me the additional question here in the audience just a second yeah I have quick technical question maybe you can just very quickly answer you have two terms both omega log omega one you explain come from small momentum scattering in other you said doesn't involve small momentum scattering is due to randomness of the interaction yes how you how you get omega log omega which doesn't involve small q scattering it's just maybe you can sketch quickly how you got it right so let me just go back to right you have we have this this diagram you're this self-energy right so if if it's a g prime term there's a additional line for disorder averaging that that you have to add that so what happens is that the momentum being carried by the boson and the internal fermion are different now they're not they're no longer the same because you know it's not you have a small q boson but you also have the disordered line and the the change in the fermion momentum is the boson momentum plus the momentum in the disordered line so it can be quite big so it's not small small q scattering there are other two very quick question please i also want to ask some technical question in the last slide you explain one over tau transport it consists of two terms one is v square and another is related with g prime yes if you take a look at the contributions at the same slide you look at the e sigma g and sigma g prime you can see that g and g prime has different dimensionalities at the same time in your Lagrangian you put them side by side so it is supposed that they have the same dimensionalities so i want to understand what is the dimensionality of g prime because it is not just some technical problem now it has important consequences in one over tau oh yeah g prime and g are the same or different sorry no there i believe that this is misprint but then you see that it gives you v square so if it is proportional to v square so you will have both terms proportional so just in the normalization so i want to understand this yeah i think we did yes so the question is why if you took the self energy the contribution of the boson to the self self energy the terms in g and g prime of different dimension one is divided by v square and the other is not so it's just a misprint or there is they are really different dimension no they are they are they are different and there's this result for the self energy yes so maybe we'll discuss later so some other question was coming from this now okay i'm sorry i have to cut because we're already running out of time so let's thank again i wish that was a nice talk and i'm ready


Hey Ellen, this is Megan with Oxmore Toyota. I just wanted to send this quick video greeting just to personally introduce myself. I did receive some information through one of our business partners that you're now in the market for a new 2016 Toyota 4Runner. When you can, go ahead and give me a call. You can reach me at<PHONE_NUMBER> and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Bye!


So welcome to the open document editor's dev room, we can start with the first presentation by Imakat. It's going to be a funny one, so we start on the right note. Okay, thank you. I'm glad to know that there's someone welcoming you, so I don't have to welcome you myself. Okay, and before we begin, anyone still playing Pokemon Go now? Oh, that's cool. Okay, I'll share your stories, hopefully I can make it sure. And one of my friends, she went to interview for a new job, and the interviewer asked her a question, saying, this position requires a persistent character. And can you show your persistency? And then she turned off her cell phone and said, look, I'm still playing Pokemon Go. Yes, I'm persistent, and you are persistent too. And, okay, some introduction, let me introduce myself. I'm from Taiwan, an open source office liberal office community. And I'm a member of the Apache National PMC. Also, I'm a member of the Women's Human Infants in Taiwan. And besides that, well, I'm a game player for almost three decades. Yeah, that reveals my age. I'm from Amistos to Windows 95, 98, and now I'm playing Linux Steam. And PC Game, I play PC Game, MUD, have anyone heard of MUD? MUD? Yeah, wow, that's cool. Okay. Did I know you? Okay, cool. We are mobile games. And my favorite game genre is always RPG, role-playing games. And, well, okay. All in all, it started as a spreadsheet. A spreadsheet is actually a very convenient space to store the information because you don't have to worry about the metadata, the data size, data type, or precision, anything. So I use spreadsheet to store all kinds of data information. For example, the journal account, including the account of this trouble. And also the student scores. I use those to record student scores or the attendees list. And this is also true when it comes to games. Since I play games a lot, I also create a lot of spreadsheet to store game data. For example, the Ultima 7, anyone heard of this? Anyone heard of this? Wow, that's cool. Okay. It also reviews my age again. And part of the 7th tile, the lost items of the main character, I use it to record what item is lost and what is replaced and the crew, how to find it. And to come to a closer age, playing spaces versus zombies, I use it to record the planes, the course, and their genre. And also this is a Chinese game, Sanctuary Battle. I used to record all the heroes I got. And this tree is amazing. Yeah, it's just amazing. Now it goes for Pokemon Go. In Pokemon Go, every Pokemon has its compact power. I believe many of you have already know. And we often compare Pokemon by their compact power. For example, you see the Charmander is 500 and the Squirtle is 400. It's apparently stronger. And some species are just stronger than the others. For example, the Krabiaba is just stronger than the male Nidoran below. And even within the same species, their CP may still be different. So they are still different from one another. So Pokemon of the same species share the same set of base stats. For example, you can see that for Pikachu, its base attack is 112. And the defense is 101 and stamina is 70. And the Snowball below is much stronger. Its attack is 177, defense 194 and stamina is 190. And in addition to these base stats, they are still also individual values. And individual values are added to the base stats and range from 0 to... There are three values range from 0 to 15. And also there's level. Pokemon has their level. And this level is indicated by R, the R below the CP. So you can see that... And there are these two ball pigs. The one above is of level 20. And the one below is of level 25. Yeah, and the R is longer. So level can be advanced by power-up. And each power-up advances the level by half. So in order to get the strongest Pokemon, we first choose the strong species with high base stats. And for Pokemon of that species, we pick the Pokemon with the highest individual values. And then we power-up to a maximum to advance its level. So now the question is how do we get lower individual values? Actually individual values are hidden. The Pokemon company won't let us to know. If you pick into the individual values, you'll be banned from the game. But we are hackers, you know. We can still calculate it from hints and clues. Actually there are several websites that calculate Pokemon individuals for you. For example, for this Gigipuff, you can see that its CP is 472. Well, it's not quite clear. Its HP is 162. And to power-up, it takes 4,000 Stardusts and three candies. So let's see. If we got up Gigipuff and 472, 162 and 4,000. Yes, we haven't powered it up yet. And then calculate. We've got eight possible combinations. Then we further limit the result. We further limit the result. Team leader's appraisal. For me, I'm in a red team. The team leader? Yes? Yeah, red team. Boo. Okay, team leader. The team leader says overall Magikarp has a strong Pokemon. You should be proud. And then he says its HP is stronger than the strongest feature. And I'm just impressed. It's attacked. And it's got excellent stats. How exciting. So let's go back to here. Team leader appraisal first through the team leader and strong Pokemon. My HP is the strongest feature. It got impressed as its attack. It got excellent stats. How exciting. Well, it limits to one value. It's 25, 14, 8, 14. Okay. With this online calculator, actually, I created, actually, I actually created, sorry. With this online calculator, I actually created a more advanced spreadsheet to score. Oh, sorry. I actually created a spreadsheet to score all my strongest Pokemon. Yeah. That's crazy thing I did. I always did something like this. Yeah. And, you know, I always do things that's useless. I like to hack useless things. Okay. Now, back to my slides. And it also, it also tell you how strong it's possible. It could possibly be, for example, the trigger, trigger, so before we see, we saw you require one. It can go to 1,000 and 800 CP and require 174,000 star dots and 190 candies to power up. So then I have a next question. My Lapras has a following IV. It's level, it's 20, 13, 12, 11. And to go to Pokemon level 39, it takes 200,000 star dots and 220,000 into CP, 2080, 800. But I only got 29 candies. So should I power it up? And Lapras is so hard to catch. So should I power it up? And how strong it would be? And to get the answer, I have to be able to calculate CP myself. And actually for popular game like this, someone already has already hacked it. So I just do the Google and found this CP formula. Yes. And you can see that attack is base attack plus the IV attack and times the CPM.  And also CP is attack times square root of defense and square root of stamina and divided by 10. OK. First, the first part of the base stats. Base stats, it can also be found on internet, someone already found it. So also I copied it and put, I copied this table. Secondly, the CPM, CP multiplier. CPM is actually a list of constants increased with levels. They can be found on internet too. And for high levels, they are calculated at real time using this formula. So for example, my battery base is 167, 151 and 120. That is 14, 159. So I apply this formula, I get a CP of 100 and 1039. And that's exactly what I got. OK. Return to my lab plus problem. The amount of stats and candy to power up can also be found on internet too. So from level 20, I found that I can only got to level 25. And to level 25, apply the film, I found the CPM of level 25. I found that I can get a possible CP to 2077. OK. That's where I got now. OK. It seems worth it. It's quite strong. So using this formula, I create a more advanced spreadsheet and to tell all the possibilities of my pokemons and how it could be. OK. OK. Then with the ability to calculate the CP actually application, the calculator is just one step away. You know it's only simply brute force. The pseudocall is quite simple. I loop through each possible level and each stamina, each attack and each defense. And if the calculator is CP, it's CP I got. And then boom, I got an answer. And the result it was 79 times 15 times 15 times 15 times 15 to 260,000 times. That's huge number and you won't stop. But we have ways to refine it. See, if we know the start us table, if we know the start us, actually we can limit the number of possible level from only four levels. And for newly coped pokemons, the level will always be whole number. So it will limit to two levels. And HP is actually the stamina as a whole number. So apply this formula. I can only also limit the IV stamina to one or two values. So the number of runs is reduced to 900 times and it's the last smaller. Now, first refinement with team leader appraisal. For a better team, the first appraisal is total stats. If it amazes me, it gets up more than 36. If it is a strong Pokemon, it goes 30 to 36. And if it is a decent Pokemon, it goes 23 to 29. But if it's not great in battle, it is less than 23. The second appraisal is its best stats. And HP is strongly future and as God is impressed as its attack. Whatever is listed, they are equally its best stats. And the third appraisal is maximum stats value. If I'm brought away by its stats, it's 15. The maximum is 15. God has seven stats. It must be 13 or 14. If they indicate in battle, I'll get the job done. It's between A and 12. It won't point to greatest in battle, it's less than A. So with this, let's see. The GGBARF we just got here. And with the CP of 472. And HP of 162 and Stardust, 4,000. And for me, my current level is 30. And it's team leader, so I got strong Pokemon. It's AP, strongly future, impressed with its attack. And excellent house stats, house sighting. Okay, then I got the result. Okay, this is done. Oh, but I see I still have five minutes. So let's show a short story. Sorry. One morning in November, when I woke up, I found my Araratus gets much stronger than I expected. Then I remember, it's weird. Actually, not only Araratus, everything, everyone is changed his power. So I went to the Pokemon fan page and found this. Yeah, the Pokemon. We have just made adjustment to a CP. And that's terrible. And it's lucky that I haven't published this calculator yet. And I quickly searched the internet and found someone has already found the table. Yeah, and I immediately applied it. And that's the first story. Second story, the other day when I woke up, when I'm working, I had something that I never seen. So I went to the Pokemon fan page again. Oh, new Pokemon added. There are Tokai P and Pichu hatching from eggs. And that's terrifying me because this time I already published it. So I spent all my coins to hatch these Pokemon and to get their data. And for those I haven't had, I even asked all my friends if they have already hatched it in order to get their data. Yeah. So the lessons I learned from here. If you are creating some game hiking tool and you don't have commercial support, you have better not publish it. Because it's really a nightmare, you know, if the game change. You know, if the game change, you have to update it immediately. And the second lesson I learned. For strong pox species like Dragonite, best stats take the largest part of the CP. You see, the tag is 263 plus 15. Defends 201 plus 15. And Stemline is 182 dot 15 dot 11 plus 11. Actually Dragonite is just stronger whatever its IV is. And the second inform factor is always its level. And for IV, we are calculating it doesn't really matters. Okay. Thank you very much. Any question? Yes. Oh, yes, I forgot it. Just, actually you can get from here. I put it on GitHub. That's another topic I'll talk about this afternoon. I put it on GitHub. And also, currently I only put it. I still not put it on, sorry. Yeah, I still not put it on the LibreOffice extension yet. But I check and just it runs smoothly on LibreOffice too. Yeah. Maybe I'll just upload it later. Yes. Any question? No question? And I hope you enjoy this. Thank you. And here are links. Thanks. I'm just checking. Everybody's got everything. Don't leave. We still have sessions. Don't leave this room. We still have sessions.


Everybody forced here ripping a box of 2023 Donor's football hobby for Daniel T. Let's go Daniel Let's find something nice here Tank Delrayed rookie to start So go on there Evans dominators burrow road of the Super Bowl Tyler Steen Excuse me power plush Josh Allen great iron Kings Tyreek Simmons red O'Connell rated rookie Jake Hainer the rookies Bomb squad mims Clayton Tune There's an a-chan A-chan elite series for the Dolphins tank bigs be canvas rated rookie. You're sorry, and I can portrait rated rookie for the Jags and It's 25 rated rookie Kenny Macintosh Scored last night. I think Kenny Macintosh at 25 rated rookie Carlson Joey Porter, Jr. digs there Kellen Winslow Derek Forrest, Jr. Roderick Jones Boza B. John Robinson bomb squad Brian branch Steve Young will Anderson portrait rated rookie followed by JK Dobbins Key on white Jersey Kings Tony Pollard number to 399 Jersey card on the Pollard. There's a Pollard Dominators there and a highlights Pollard a lot of Pollard A lot of sap Roshan Johnson. There's a Will Anderson, Jr. Elite series rookie for the Texans there great iron King Jackson Smith and Jigba and a Gabriel Davis purple numbered 78 of 500 Brandon I and Deontay Davis Good God Vaughan Jalen Carter the rookies Champus here Harrison butler Marvin Mims red rated rookie fun needs to go to bed Vaughan that I tell you that I bought a Ross I Dowling auto Chris Rodriguez, Jr. For reasons on but I don't even know Elite series Tony Pollard There we go the rookies auto tank big speed at a 299 It's happened dude. It's two bucks. I had to do it. Thank big speed the rookies auto their app nice one there Jake Heyner red Michael Thomas Henson Hooker rated rookie O'Connell the rookies No-name variation of single Terry Yeah, it's like less than three bucks. It was like less than four bucks for shipping in the card Purdy there. He has no like pro uniform autos It was a Virginia Cavaliers Ross I Dowling auto, which is crazy. It was a second rounder. I guess I guess products I guess collecting was different back then. It's not the same as it is now where they have autos of so many guys Breesie Erlacher Macy Smith portrait butte rated rookie red Tyler Scott Michael Wilson rated rookie aqueous test Lave Jaden Reid bomb squad. I know Vaughn's on eBay right now looking up Ross I Dowling autos too. There's no he is Puka Nakua rated rookie Puka Quentin Johnston tank Dell great iron Kings and a Desmond King to 75 Saxons manual Forbes Anthony Richardson the rookies which Eisen Will Anderson jr. Rated rookie jackham and Godwin. All right Daniel that is gonna do it for your break Appreciate the order get those cards out to you


When I go back home, I would definitely want to stay connected with organizations like the Cancer Council and the Starlight Foundation. The organizations that I've followed over these two years, I've been a part of their campaigns, more so because I want to implement what they do in Australia back in Pakistan. My first goal is to connect with a global alumni so that I will be stay connected with this program, this Australian Awards. I definitely would love to stay connected with all my Australia Awards friends and also the other classmates from all over the world. Pretty much, you know, wherever you go, you already have a friend because of this. I would say my friends from the university itself and also my colleague because even it's just the short period of time, but we really have a great time here in Australia. I definitely want to stay connected with my fellow alumni, the friends that I have met here, and a lot of the professors that I have been building a very strong relationship with through my work. I would stay connected with the professional association in Australia because they can give me an update related to their careers, development, and also the funding of research. I want to stay connected to a network of academics, researchers, and NGO people that will benefit my career and journalism, definitely. I want to stay connected with my friends. I have many friends here now, and at the same time, I want to contact with my academics because if I do future studies, it will be very important. Oh, I want to stay connected to the whole country when I go home.


Hey Virgo, this is Kelly from House of Virgo. Here to do your next 24 hours love reading for Virgo's Sun, Moon, Rising, and Venus. Some of the messages may or may not resonate, just take what fits, leave the rest. This reading is for Virgos and Virgos only, okay? If you would like to get a personal reading, there's a link in the description box below. All the links are down there for whatever you need to contact me or to get a reading with me. All right, let's take a look here, Virgo. You've had some pretty great readings the past couple of days. So let's see what the love energy is past, present, and future. Okay, nine of cups in the past, the eight of swords, and the four of pentacles. The present is the three of swords, the queen of wands in the world, and the future is the page of pentacles, the ace of wands, and the knight of wands. I can already tell you, just looking at the cards right here right now, already the first thing that came to me is somebody here in the past, definitely feeling like you are the end all be all to everything for them, okay? That abundance, that wish come true, just complete contentment.  This is it, this is where I've landed with Virgo. This is my person, but this person struggling, there was a lot of restrictions and there wasn't any movement, okay? Could have been the world restrictions that was going on, this person didn't wanna let you go, okay? If it wasn't the restrictions, it could have been both or that this person was just kind of like in victim mode and they hid a lot of their insecurities. Let's take a look and see what the love messages are. Okay, true love, this is the romance of a lifetime, forgiving and learning. As you release and heal the past, you experience more love in your present moments. Honeymoon, okay, and soulmate, all right, Virgo. So yes, this is your soulmate, there's no doubt, okay? And I feel like that, was that recently? I'm not sure, but, and it's definitely true love, like you know deep in your heart, Virgo, that this is your true love, this is your person, okay? We do have fire sign energy here, Leo Sagittarius Aries for the only court card that's showing up here, okay? That could also be your energy as well. There's a lot of healing that needs to be done in order to move forward in this connection, okay? Because I feel like these are two very contradicting cards here in the past. This person really feeling like you were it and you were everything, but they were unable to make a move towards you, okay? That eight of sorits energy is like, they restricted themselves, they were in this mental imprisonment, the four of pentacles. This person was like long-term trying, their intentions were to hold on to you, right? You, it's like they wanted you, but they just couldn't make it happen. They withheld and they just would hold back a lot of stuff. Yeah, at the same time, that nine of pentacle energy is, or sorry, that nine of cups energy is like, they knew you were it for them. There was just something that made them very happy to be with you and a sense of like emotional contentment and peace with you yet. They were very restricted. Let's take a look at this nine of cups energy here, Virgo. Okay, the magician. Yeah, this person was, they may have manifested you. You guys might have met a certain way and it was like, kids met the way you met, okay? You were definitely brought together for some type of purpose. The magician is Virgo Gemini energy, but I feel like their intentions were to kind of like bring this relationship, you know, the things that they hoped for, and wanted with you into reality. They were very inspired by you. And I do feel like they wanted this stuff, but they had a lot of that holding back, holding back, holding back. So it was like, they'd stick their toe in and be there with you and then pull back out again. And that might have been a cycle that you were in with this person. Okay, we do have the king of swords to clarify. So for some, it could be, it could have been Aquarius, Gemini or Libra. However, that king of swords, you know, he's intentional, he or she was very intentional. Their intentions, like the king of swords is very honest. Their intentions were to be with you. They had a lot of this holding back energy. I do feel like you are their true love, okay?  They may not use that word, but you are their other half. At least that's how they felt in the past. Let's take a look at this eight of swords, okay? Yeah, this person with a star needed a lot of healing, a lot of internal healing. That eight of swords energy can sometimes be like mental depression or anxiety. Like this is like on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Like this person, you probably did bring a lot of healing energy to them. And I feel like a lot of the reason why they were holding onto you for so long is because they knew that you had some type of a gift or there was something about you, okay? Let me see. It just feels to me like you had this ability with this person to bring them hope, okay?  At least that's how they felt in the past. Like they can't even believe, they couldn't even believe that someone like you would just be interested. They had you, I don't know that they had you up on this massive pedestal, but they were just so incredibly in awe of you. And this person felt very negative about themselves. About themselves. Let's take a look at this four of pentacles. And they also withheld. They blocked their heart and they withheld. Might have been very focused on money, career, work, but just not letting anybody in, but yet not wanting to let you, not letting you in, but not wanting to let you go. Okay, seven of wands, very defensive. This person had a very defensive energy. Not trying to like blocking their heart. I feel like this, your person in the past just didn't want you to know how they felt about themselves or they didn't want you to see that side. They really wanted to manifest something here, but they didn't want to see. Want you to see that they had these things about themselves that they were hiding. And they did not that just with you, but with everyone. It was almost like a false mask, but I do feel like it is, and it was true love for them with you. It may still be. Let's take a look. I just want to get one more card for this seven of wands. Yeah, strength with all their might and all their courage. They withheld big, big, deep insecurities and things like that in the past. Now, the current energy is the three of sorts, the queen of wands in the world. And I really feel like this is you, Virgo. We'll take a look at your person going into the future, but right now, I just kind of feel like your heart is broken and you are, you're in boss mode here with the queen of wands. And with the world, like it's 2021 here, you are like closing this book and going off to write a whole new chapter in your life. There might have been a third party affair. Now, third party could mean another person, but it could have been a place or a thing. No matter what it was, could be anything.  They just had other things or even if they didn't have other things or they didn't tell you that they had other things, they treated you like there was other things going on for them, okay? And you may have always felt like they were just blocking and withholding, yet wanting to be with you. And it's like leaving you kind of waiting, like a stalemate, let's say, yeah, I just saw that with the three of swords here, because then we have two swords here. So this interference caused a stalemate in this relationship. And I feel like for you, Virgo, currently you're the one who's given the three of swords, like you're walking away. I just see you. See this three of, ah-ha, there's your two of swords. Just what I said, I was clarifying the three of swords. Was a tool, a tool, it was a stalemate. A decision, a compromise needed to be made in order to, and a decision in order to move this thing forward. And I feel like, Virgo, you're making this decision that you are, for now, just walking away. You're not investing. You're not putting anything into this anymore. You might have even blocked this person, or you're just not making any decisions and you're keeping quiet. You don't wanna see, you don't wanna know. Let's see this queen of wands, okay? Oh yeah, Virgo, because you know that you deserve this knight of cups. You know that you deserve someone to come in and bring you that love, not just the romance, but to love you, right? And to give you that attention and that security and that safety. You know, someone who actually comes forward and, or just somebody new who is on the same page as you and is ready to take action as the knight, okay? So you're standing here. I don't care, look, it's Leo Aries Sagittarius but you're embracing the element of fire at this time. All right, Virgo? You are just being confident. You're quite feeling like, you know, Virgo, that you probably already have another offer. You may be getting another offer from someone who's like really interested while this other person is just keeping you a stalemate. This can be the Pisces card. So it could be a Pisces coming in for you. If your past person was a Pisces, it's not them. This is somebody new coming in but this knight of cups is very charming and romantic.  You want passion and you want romance. That's what I feel. This person could be coming in from, you know, out of town. Now for some of you, this could be your person in the present coming in and offering this love, right? But you have to know that the knight of cups, because if you decide to just break it off with them like say you're out or you're done or just go, this could be your person coming in but you have to understand based on the other cards and the stalemate, this person would be coming in from the past because you're leaving, okay? And that knight of cups will come in and he goes, he's constantly in movement so he doesn't stick.  But Virgo, no matter what, I see you're like, you're moving forward.  Oh, you just wanna go to dinner? Oh, okay, and you'll do it. Like, you're just fine with it, you know? But you're gonna, you're keeping it moving. Let's see the world. Yeah, five of swords. So you're the one who's doing the shutout, the cutting off, you're keeping it, wow, Virgo, taking a lot of courage for you because I feel like Virgo, you are so patient and loving and understanding and compassionate, but I feel like at some point, you know, all Virgos get to a point like where they're just completely exhausted and then when they're done, that's it. That is it.  You know, after all that, you know, that just doesn't seem like it's gonna fly for you.  But that five of swords, I don't know, that's tough. I kind of feel bad for your person because I feel like for some of you, this is an abusive relationship and you're leaving it. You're getting out of it. You're closing the book on it.  You need like a real thing. And for them to not even acknowledge that and then just come in with this, you know, there could be a sorry attached to it, but I had a boyfriend when I was 16 and he told me, his mother used to say to him, sorry means you'll never do it again. Never tell someone you're sorry unless you're intending to change the behavior, right? And for some of you, I feel like you really tried to pour some healing energy into this connection with this person in the past. You've really tried to be like, you know, a star in their life, but it feels like either this person was too blocked and they just couldn't do it. That this person just has some stuff they need to work on internally, you know, if they can't work on that stuff, even if you guide them to that water to drink, you know, it's up to them to take the drink, you know? So for you, it's just, I feel like has gotten to a point where it just feels abusive, like you'll be with them, you know, maybe you're with them in the past and then they disappear.  So I feel like with that five of swords, you are kind of taken on the narcissist thing.  I just feel like you're having to like throw it back and say, I'm done here. I'm done, I'm moving on. The rest of this year, I'm going traveling because things are open up now.  I'm gonna go write that book.   Like the two of swords has to go to the three because it's next in line. The two never just stays the two, it has to go to the three.  And then the five of swords is here. The challenge though is gonna be for you to be in the four of swords energy where you can not just cut off, but stay gone. Okay, so let's see what's going on in the future of this person. There is a struggle here and the forgiving and learning, I mean, I feel like what's gonna help you move forward if that's what you choose to do at this time. You're gonna have to really forgive this person for not being capable of giving you what you want. You might have tried. Okay, but in order to move on and be happy, this is probably like the best thing for you to do if you can manage it to say, okay, this had nothing to do with me. This has nothing, this is their childhood traumas or whatever things that were going on. And I've done my very best to love this person and try to be there for them. But I can't fix these. They're psychiatrists that take years to try to help people's childhood traumas, right? Or whatever things that might have happened to them or however they were raised or whatever it might be. And I feel like you have to forgive and just say, I didn't cause this problem and I'm not taking it with me. Okay, and learn from it so that you can experience more love in your life going forward. And I'm just gonna say this again, Virgo. I do feel that this person, they felt like you were their true love. They just didn't know how to do it. Whatever might have happened to them if they had a bad breakup in the past, they're just really, I just feel like you gotta leave them be for a while. You just gotta move on with things, okay? So, all right, let's take a look, cause I was saying, okay, we do have the honeymoon card here. So if there's any holidays or anything come, I think the 4th of July here in the United States, wherever else you are in the world, if you have any holidays coming up, there might be getting together.  They might try to buy you a ticket or they might, there might be communication about some kind of a ticket or something. Doesn't have to be a holiday coming up like now. It's just any time going forward. The night of wands is here, travel, and the ace of wands with like a new beginning, okay? Now, for some of you, this could be like a lot of fun times with somebody. Okay, somebody else very well could be that. The ace of wands can be like a very physical card. The ace in the night of wands, okay? I feel like, you know, you might get some communication from someone, you know, with that page of pentacles, where there's, you know, it's not love communication, but it's more kind of like, you might be talking to somebody's, could be somebody you work with, or you might be talking to somebody about work or money. You know, this person comes across as being very patient, could be talking about ideas and concepts and stuff, but I kind of feel like you're gonna be holding a torch for someone and that person's gonna come your way. Very physical, lusty energy here, but we'll put some clarifying cards to see, you know, who is this person?  For some of you, it could be a fire sign, Aries, Leo, Sagittarius going forward, could be traveling with a fire sign. Let's see, show me this page of pentacles. What is this message with these page of pentacles here? Okay, oh, oh. All right, Virgo, this is your person, feeling the loss, grieving, remorse, regret. Okay, five of cups here. It's your past person, okay? This person feeling abandoned and feeling unloved because you walked away, maybe they offer their cup and you're just like, no, because either you don't trust it or you just feel like the cycle's gonna repeat. And they're coming, they're gonna keep trying to talk to you. And they might actually try to get together with you and, you know, either again or, well, it would be again because it's a past person, okay? And they may try to communicate with you but not lovey-dovey stuff like real communication. Their thoughts and ideas and plans and things they would like to execute with you, okay? This person comes in very inspired that Ace of Wands. There's a very strong physical attraction here. And I feel like they're going to try to come to where you are or travel somewhere with you. Let's take a look at the Ace of Wands, okay? The High Priestess. Wow, huh, it's gonna be a surprise. This person is a very, like they're kind of like low-key. That's how I wanna say, they're a bit low-key. Now that can be Pisces cancer, Virgo energy for some, but this person's very low-key. They don't really say too much, but I don't know, with that Ace of Wands, it's like a new, they've been thinking, trusting their intuition and a new inspirational idea or a plan, you know, a new beginning initiation. This person gets like some kind of courage and takes lead. Let's clarify that. Yep, the world to clarify the High Priestess. And here they come. Traveling the world, they've been thinking about it and they're gonna probably reach out to you and say, what do you think of this idea? What do you think if I come there? What do you think if I come visit? They're gonna try to up the ante. Are you still gonna take it? You might not, okay? But you might, because the honeymoon card is here. Enjoy the holiday bliss. I'm gonna get more clarifiers because that, like I said, the knights are in and out. The knights are in and out. Oh yeah, nine of cups. We're starting, we're ending the reading the way we started with this person. You are still a wish fulfillment for this person. They're gonna keep trying. Burko, what? What? What are you gonna do? I almost feel like some of you are like, I know.  And then, you know, I just wanna pull another clarifier. I feel like we're continuing the story. Yeah, it's ten of swords. They're just like surrendering, you know, giving up here. But it could also very well have them tell you that and come in and then end it on there. It could be an upper hand thing. Burko, you just gotta be very careful. You just gotta pay attention to like long, look, they say pay attention to words and actions must match, but no, I mean, yeah, but that's not the whole equation. It has to be the pattern. You have to pay attention to the pattern of their words and their actions. That's how you know history repeats itself. You can't just jump back in because their words and their actions are meeting up at the exact same time. You have to say to yourself, okay, their words and actions are meeting up at the exact, but can they maintain that? Can they maintain that? Because look, it's very easy for us to get up at five o'clock in the morning, once a week, but can we maintain that? That's the consistency is what you need to see, right? In the moon, yeah, a lot of secrets with this person. I don't know, Burko, I'm not gonna tell you what to do, but it kinda looks like, you know, this person truly does love you, but they have a lot of fears, the question might be, okay, yeah, I see you have those fears, and I know you wanna be with me and I get it, but you keep coming in, you know, you're breaking my heart and then you're coming back in. You're breaking my heart and you're coming back in. And these could be reversed. You could be doing the same thing in reverse to this person, but the cycle keeps happening, and it's either you have to find a way to change the dynamic of this relationship if you're gonna stay with this person, or you have to move on. And I feel like a lot of you are presently, you know, when this energy comes in, because you feel like, oh, it's a stalemate again, I feel like a lot of you might be just deciding, I'm out, like a foxhole kinda, you know, like reactive kind of an I'm out. You might need a little time to think about this, right? Cause I do feel like this is your true love as well.  But this forgiving and learning definitely needs to happen. I feel like you both wanna spend time together when you're both free to spend time together, you know? I mean, it could just very well, I don't know, I don't really, I don't see many Virgos ever settling for like a casual relationships, many Virgo women. You know, if they are, they're probably like feeling hopeless that they might even deserve more than that. Or they're just so busy in their lives that they don't have time for anything else. And if that's your situation, well, I guess you don't have to worry about it. Love yourself first, your self-respect makes you more romantically attractive, Virgo, I feel like that's really what's going on here, right?  Okay, here's the deception card. I knew that was gonna come. Someone's wearing a false self-mask in this relationship. And I said that already, hiding behind, you know, this person needs some type of healing. They need a mentor or a life coach or someone who's gonna give them good advice, good direction, okay? Because it's not necessarily cheating with somebody else but it's like pretending to be who or not, not living, not showing our authentic selves, you know? I feel like this person maybe has issues with perfectionism or has been in situations where they just don't feel worthy enough of love or maybe again in their life. But I feel like Virgo, if your person said to you, hey, this is really how I feel. I had something that was really hard for me in the past and it really broke me. Virgo, your person just doesn't understand the kind of healing energy that you have. Like you're so compassionate and loving and warm and willing to give. And if they could just see and understand, I feel like you would definitely, like you wouldn't do the work for them but you would help guide them to get the healing because you value the relationship so much and you value yourself. But I feel like you're coming to a point here where it's like, yeah, but I mean, I can lead them to water but if they're not gonna drink it, what am I supposed to do, right? Like if you've been giving all your love and everything and they're just not responding to that, then it may be time for you to just move on and just love yourself instead first, right Virgo? Yup, five of pentacles because I feel like you feel like you're left out in the cold a lot of the time. Just simple things, even if this person, it's a lot of work to be with them. That's all I'm saying. Some of you can do it, some of you can't. But I feel like it's a lonely place with them because this person doesn't feel like they can be what you need them to be. And yet they don't wanna lose you at the same time. That's really not fair, they should let you go. But they're not gonna be strong enough to do it. You may have to be the one to do it, Virgo. But just know you're probably their first true, true love or you are their true love. Like you've touched a place in their heart that I don't know that this person has ever experienced before, okay? They may have thought that they did, but I don't know that they truly ever did. And that probably got very scary for them, because true love, true love is vulnerability. True love, that's the lover. So that's total no shame, opening up, not hiding anything. All right, Virgo, I'm gonna leave you reading there. I hope you enjoyed it. It was a little bit longer than usual, but yeah, please do hit like, share, and subscribe, and I'll talk to you guys very soon. Take care.


Jeff Frick here at theCUBE. We're at the LA Convention Center at E3. It's our first time coming to this convention. It's 68,000 people in every single hall and outside, inside, hotels. It's pretty crazy. Great to see you. Thanks so much for having me. Years ago, it was really much more about a trade show so that the big people who are going to buy the disc could actually come to E3, check out our games and place their disorders, and now it's really much more of a consumer phenomenon as well. Less of a competition like brands trying to outdo each other, but let's make this more about the games than the Booth babes and those things. It's funny, everything's changed and nothing's changed. People are always super excited. There's always gamers that want to see the newest stuff. That hasn't changed at all, but just the sheer technology differences. So we're doing this series as part of the Western Digital Data Makes Possible, and data is such a big part of what you guys do. You can really start to understand who your players are, and so if you're gonna do an upsell offer, you can understand like, oh, this person has actually already purchased this type of material, so I'm gonna give them this type of upsell versus this type of upsell, or, you know, I see all my players are really struggling on level three and no one's making it through. What's wrong with level three? They're spending too much time in an area not knowing what they're doing. We'll go, okay, right, we need to change that. We need to signpost that differently. We need to turn around and say, how can we make it clearer to the player so they know what they do, but also keep the rewards so that they feel like they've achieved it. They feel like they've figured it out. Right. We place people in front of the game in very early stages to see if our core ideas are working, and then based on that, we then look at video footage, interviews, and all that stuff to kind of, that feedbacks into the design loop of the process. Previously, years ago, to get some of these insights, you would have had to be one of the largest game companies on the planet, and now with, you know, the democratization of these different game engines and then the democratization of this type of like tooling and online services that are available, it really creates an amazing opportunity for all developers everywhere. We see these tremendous booths that are here, fabulous graphics, VR coming down the pike, CPU and graphical chips are all over the place. So basically power and internet and 5G's coming, mobility is gonna be way, way faster. The horsepower that you need to run these kind of games is actually pretty staggering. We compute a lot of stuff on the GPUs, the CPUs, tons and tons and tons of objects. We have physics constraints and things that are costly for the computation cycles, and then there's like memory issues. You know, we have streaming that we have to kind of get better at. These worlds are very large, and so to store the things that you're gonna see and do takes a lot of actual, you know, hard drive space and the speed at which we can load and unload things is a critical factor in terms of, you know, unlocking the freedom of your experience. Right. We really have a PC development technology that is easy to port to Xbox and PlayStation. So we have a private cloud in Europe and a private cloud in North America.  Oh yeah, we run it totally on our own infrastructure and it has its advantages because we're completely in control, but I think now we just don't need to make the big investment in hardware up front. We can solve all the problems in a cloud solution and then deploy either privately or publicly. It's much more flexible now than it was. We know from our creator standpoint, the biggest thing that they complain about is, hey, I want to grow, right? Like I've been streaming for X amount of years, I've been creating content, how do I grow? At Twitch we have like the broadest means of ways to monetize, but also the lowest barrier of entry to take advantage of them. And our subscribers, by the way, they know that they're supporting you and proud to do so. You know, they enjoy supporting the kind of creators, because they know if they didn't support you, you might not be streaming and they love being playing a role and keeping their favorite creators around. The content that you see here today is much more diverse and much broader. You know, we still have a long way to go as an industry, but it's very different than my first E3 17 years ago. It used to be gamers played games because of the technology, and now they play games because of the games because no one cares about the technology anymore because you could do almost anything on any device now and now, so it's really important to us as game developers to hide the technology from players and just give them a great experience. And every year, you know, new stuff rolls out, slightly newer Xbox, slightly newer PlayStation, better PCs, so we just stay up to date with the drivers and make sure that we support whatever crazy hardware is coming out and it all works. Right. You're watching theCUBE from E3 at Lincoln Vincent Center. Thanks for watching.


An easy way to form almost any question in English from espressoenglish.net. Forming questions in English can be confusing, but today I'm going to teach you a simple formula that works for asking questions in almost all the verb tenses. This formula is called QUASM. Question word, auxiliary verb, subject, main verb. Let's see how it works in the present simple. Where do you work? The question word is where. The auxiliary verb is do. The subject is you. And the main verb is work. Here are three more examples. What does Martha think about the project? How do you like your new apartment? How many kids does Bob have? The formula also works in the past simple, where the auxiliary verb is did. For example, how did they learn English so fast? When did you get home? What did the manager think about your idea? Where did he buy that shirt? To form questions in the present continuous, the auxiliary verb is is or are. And the main verb is in the ing form. For example, what are you doing right now? Why is he ignoring me? What time are we meeting up for dinner? Who is she dating these days? In the past continuous, the auxiliary verb is was or were. And the main verb also has the ing form. For example, who were you talking to yesterday? What was Jim doing when you called? Why were the children eating candy before dinner? How was he feeling after the surgery? Let's look at the present perfect. In the present perfect, the auxiliary verb is have or has. And the main verb is the past participle form. For example, how much have you spent on clothes this month? How long has Mary worked at this school? This also works for the present perfect continuous. As in the questions, what have they been doing all day? Why has the client been complaining? To form questions in the future, we can use will or going to. But the formula still applies. For example, who will you invite to the party? What will your parents think about your plan? When are you going to clean your room? Why is she going to quit her job? And finally, we can use the quasm formula for making questions with modal verbs. For example, what would you do if you had a million dollars? How could we improve our English? Where should I go on my next vacation? Why can't I open this file? Here are a few exceptions to the formula. Yes or no questions do not use a question word. But they still follow ASM, auxiliary verb, subject, main verb. Let's look at some examples. Do you like bananas? Did he enjoy the movie? Are they studying English?  Has Jane finished her homework?  Is he going to accept the job offer? Should we take the earliest flight? Questions where the main verb is be also don't follow quasm. But remember when forming these questions that to be always comes before the subject. For example, are you thirsty? Is she a teacher? Were your parents angry when you failed the test? Was her ex-boyfriend a basketball player? A few more exceptions are reported questions, indirect questions, and subject questions. These also do not follow the quasm formula. But I'll teach you those in a future lesson. If you want to improve your English and master all the verb tenses as well as more complex sentence structures, check out my Advanced English Grammar course, which will help you take your English from good to great. Click on the link in the video or in the description for more information.


Time in the offices. It was good. It was good. Now time for dinner. You're going to Papi's house? Wow I love you, Seth. Good to see you, buddy. Wanna wave to YouTube? Hi YouTube All right good Good to be back good to be back at the house after a big day waking up at 5 a.m. And Getting a run in getting a lot of work done boy. That was a productive afternoon and Angie had a great so yesterday's vlog was titled the hashtag QD Ask me anything or ask YouTube ask me anything something like that and Angie had a good question How long and this was it how long does it take to? Film edit publish the daily vlog and I get that quite often that question And it's basically come down to this about 30 minutes of filming where I'm actually holding the camera or Setting up a time lapse outside about 30 minutes approximately and of course all of these times are flexible depending on the day Editing I've got it down to 30 minutes folks now listen some days I really spend more time because I have time this pat this summer like whoa not much extra time to do High-end vlog editing so right now for these five to seven minute vlogs that you've been experiencing over the last two To three weeks. It's been or maybe two months really yeah, two to four four weeks It's been about a 30 minute edit So I feel pretty good about that the longest thing You know what takes the longest is actually choosing the song a lot of times so And then for publishing I hit upload and I'll go do a run or I'll go mow the front yard Because at my house it takes about 20 to 30 minutes to upload then I'll hit publish Title it thumbnail it and then be on my merry way. So I'd say every day It's about an hour to an hour and 15 minutes of my time Angie great question and yes the comment of the week is coming up stay tuned in the meantime I'm just getting some food and the boys are off with Kate the great sister Merce and We're just here just living life on a Monday. So So tempting to sit in this here chair and read these here books But instead a little bit of virtue practice and a little virtue and doing this Evening walk the battery is flashing. So I got to keep this extra quick promise to answer some of your questions But rather than from yesterday's vlog go check it out. I pose the question doll of you What would you like to ask me and true love or true love and I I should say and so how did you know? Let me just make sure I don't fall into a hole. Okay. How did you know Brigid was the one? Thank you, Rachel for that question beautiful question and there's so so many ways to answer that question Rachel, but I don't even know where to begin other than to say I Love Brigid's Positive attitude true loves positive attitude and her energy like she's alive Does that make sense? She's alive and many of you have commented in the past saying that Brigid could have her own YouTube channel Her own vlog. She never would because she doesn't she's not on social media But I agree wholeheartedly wholeheartedly and I would one up you and say she could have her own TV show She wanted she's that positive and encouraging and loving and That was the first thing that I noticed when we met at the Celtic in downtown Denver an Irish pub So Rachel I could go on for hours and hours about how I knew But that was one of the things that stood out to me was She just like love life was full of life and was so encouraging and positive Toward me when I met her so anyway does that was one more question that I wanted to answer, but I can't find it now hmm anyway, what is Something that is popular today that maybe you like But you have a good feeling in five years you're gonna look back on and be like wait a minute That was kind of silly or not really something I maybe should have enjoyed so much So that's the question today. What is something that you really like right now? It could be food. It could be a social media. It could be clothing. It could be music Anything that's really popular right now that you like which in five years you're gonna look back and be like Each other we're back on track. We're back on track I'm caught up on editing caught up on life a little bit with the house except for the painting Dave See you


to hashtag entrepreneurship Tuesday at Y in the morning at Y254 channel is where you can find us across all our social media handles at Michelle Ashira is where you can reach out to me in this particular session we look into another interview about getting to understand how important it is to invest in the music industry and joining me is none other than Binti Raqail hello how you doing I'm fine how you I am no we are happy to have you on board this day okay so starting us off when did you discover that you have talent in singing I'm okay I discover like three years ago that I've been singing church youth choirs since I was young but I never realized that it's gonna be part of my life so I think three years back that's when I discovered that I can really write something and put it into a song okay and why did you take you long to actually you know manifest whichever you actually desire for the longest period of time in your life you happen yeah yeah so when you just still okay when we are growing you still learning and you still come along with many challenges so it takes time to realize okay so how long have you been into the music industry now three years now mm-hmm okay so when you're starting off what a couple of challenges you're facing just getting into this new space and what were you employed prior to this are you in this full time at the moment now I'm not in it's full time because it hasn't started to give me much revenue yet yeah okay so for someone who is watching this and they really want to get into the music scene but there's also the aspect of you and as much as some the expectations that you have that you have to invest before you actually get your returns well you tell that person who feels that I'm not about to jump you know and take a risk like that one okay music come come with passion so first if you have the passion that's the first step and if you want you okay next I think you also have to have like a good job or a review that can assist you in doing the music and also yeah you shouldn't give up did you have someone who held your hand while starting off in this industry okay I have my family and partly some friends who really give me a courage and push me up yeah what was your experience when you went to the studio for the first time and which song was that that you went to actually record okay it's weird because the first song that I made I didn't put it on the studio but the first song that I did on the studio was a Christmas song all right so looking back I'm just checking your profile on YouTube you have a couple of songs these are Pokemon song known as I want I don't want to mispronounce this word the Pokemon song it's me time which means I'm it's sweet it's it yeah and then these I do and then what I've noticed is that there's a like a back-to-back release from August and just your reason jam I did I do yes I do yeah so is that like an intentional was that an intentional upload or intentional release of your music yeah okay what was the whole idea about it okay I actually did the videos early this year before COVID so after COVID started I was like I didn't know how to release them you know so that's why it took a long time a long time to release like almost what I have time okay looking back three years down the line do you regret venturing into this space no I don't regret at all because I think music is part of me and I really feel happy and content inside all right for someone who is watching this and let's go back to the fact that it's an investment right before you get any return it's like any other business so for someone who is watching this and wondering I'm I'm working somewhere else maybe employed or running my own business and then these music I'm actually just putting in all like it's definitely investment and waiting to the returns how do you show your patient and actually persistent and just going forward yeah okay actually if you have just like I've said before you have to have the passion and also music it's not like one thing like you can see my first video I did it on 2017 then I saw it's something that you have it has to be consistent you have to put you more energy into it so consistency is also very important right and what makes you like resilient because it's not easy yeah that's why I say if it has to be passion okay Raquel you have a different sound when comes to music and you have numerous amazing artists currently in the game what is so different about Raquel okay what's different about me okay I think it's because I do all kind of music okay yeah and I find it so difficult to specialize in one of them because I really want to write my idea and what is my it's in my mind so when I say I only specialize in gospel it's it's difficult for me to do that so I just decided I'm going to do all of them okay so you don't put in a box explore yeah all right so I've listened to your performance song and I loved it even though I understand I think about the same it's about love so on that note let's listen into one of your song and then we'll get back to this conversation all right


This paper will be a bit different to what you usually see at these kinds of conferences, so we're not trying to estimate any causal effect or show some interesting correlations that might be indicative of one, but rather we try to provide a methodological contribution showing you what is possible with the new data which are available electronically nowadays. So the main motivation for the paper is that, as you all know, migration data is highly problematic. If you want to look at international migration between several countries at the same time, there are a few sources with which you can reliably do that. You probably know most of them, what bank has nice data, there's the OECD migration panel data for example that we use here. Even in those data sets where people have made a great effort to standardize definitions and so on, you have problems with inconsistencies, these data come out two or three years at best after migration has happened and in some countries you even don't get any information because they don't provide any data which can be put into these kinds of formats. At the same time you have more and more geolocated data which is generated by smart phones, by activity on the internet, think of for example sending a tweet, which if you don't turn off the setting will be georeferenced so you know exactly the geolocation of the person who just tweeted and the same is possible with something similar as possible with Google and that's something we'll be using. And as you probably know migrants try to get information, so they don't only ask the friends, acquaintances, family, but of course young people especially in cities or in places which are electrified, they look up things on the internet and there's not that much research on that yet but I think it's very, very interesting how people get these kinds of information. So a research question could be summarized as is online search behavior in some way predictive of migration moves from the origin countries where people search for information to some destination countries and might we be able to develop some kind of proxy of demand for emigration or demand for information about migration possibilities on there? In our concrete case we use Google Trends. If you don't know that yet, it's basically a tool to summarize Google search volumes across the world so if you could just put it on the standard setting and enter a word, so here this is the word visa which is somewhat problematic because it can be confounded for the financial service but anyway then you get a map for example of search volumes in a particular year, darker colors mean there have been more searches for that term and then you can basically download also the time series behind that data down to a weekly level for example if you need that, this would be an annual snapshot here which gives you some variation of a time and some information about search behavior in a particular country. You can also zoom in but we're not going to do that today. So potentially people could Google hundreds of thousands of things. Actually you could take the Merriam Webster or another big book with potential words and look through all the potential words which are somehow related to migration. That's of course a problem since we'll have annual migration data that means we would have many more potential regressors, many more time series for individual keywords then we would have observations and that of course doesn't work. So we took to some website called Semantic Link to reduce the number of potential keywords we use also to be sure that we don't cherry pick too much what kinds of words we include in the search volumes we include. So what we did was we took this website which is based on a big corpus of written works and looks at correlations of particular words in these and we entered the word migration here and then took the words which are correlated with this heavily. So I guess most of you can't read that but these are terms like emigration, visas, undocumented quotas, multiculturalism. This is another example, this is immigration you'll see in a second what you get for emigration. This helps us to go down to your keywords and then we translated these into French and Spanish as well, always included all kinds of different spellings like British American, plural, singular and so on and ran these through software to get the time series data from the website. So this is our keyword list, we not only used the word migration we also used the term economics because you know economic issues can also indicate either reason to be attracted to foreign country or to leave your own country. So there's a whole lot of words and the approach doesn't depend on any particular of these. We then took the OECD international migration panel data as a yearly panel since we started that project two years ago we're still using the data up to 2013. Part of the reason is that we would like to have proper out of sample experiment next year maybe or next month where we use the new data which came out. After that you see if our approach still works. So in this data if you haven't worked with them you get migration numbers per year from almost all countries in the world to 33 OECD countries. There are a few OECD countries which are not well covered because they for example don't have good migration data but in general the data are as good as it gets I think for these kinds of international cross country regression. We then combine that with world development indicators to get some idea of how widespread internet uses literacy in the countries of origin then with a nice data set by Jacques Militz and Fari Toubal on spoken languages in different countries to get an idea of whether for example English is actually spoken in the country we think our English keywords should be working in and then of course the usual things like distance and so on which make a difference for migration flows. We then have two specifications we test. One is panel fixed effects regression basically where we have the lock inflow to the whole of the OECD by each foreign nationality. You can do the same with each country of origin doesn't really change much. Then you have a vector of these time series for each search term we include. Then origin specific control variables as I said for example population size GDP and so on. You can add destination specific control variables like the GDP or the growth rate of the OECD indicating how attractive it is at any particular moment and then we have fixed effects for the country of origin time fixed effects per year and narrow term. Our second specification is closer to what forecast is used. This puts us basically against the benchmark of just expecting last year's inflow of migrant for this year which is quite a good forecast if you look at the R squared of that but we want to do better than that so we use, we try to cancel these kinds of things out so we control for last year's inflow as well plus the percentage increase in the inflow two years ago to this year so for example if migration has been growing by five percent per year we would expect it to grow another five years in the baseline to make sure that it's not just picked up by our Google trends variables and then we have our trends variables and all the other controls as well. So main result I didn't put it in a table because it's not very informative to look at the individual keywords but what we see is that depending on which specification we use the R squared of these regressions within R squared increases by at least a hundred percent and almost or can triple and sometimes almost quadruple but of course if you have run these kinds of regressions you start from a very, very low variation that you can explain so typically we use for example we're modeled by Anna Maria Meida that she has published in a really good paper as a benchmark case and with her specification we get in R squared of 0.006 and that increases to say twice that or even up to 0.2 if we look at specific groups. What kind of specific subgroups of countries for example when we exclude countries which really just use English or Spanish as the local language basically by definition. We include countries for example where only five percent of the population can speak English then our performance gets better which I think makes sense if people don't actually look for information in that language that shouldn't be very predictive of migration but of course if you add lots of different regressors to your regression model and your risk overfit so just by chance all this variation of the keywords can very nicely explain the changes in migration over time and that's a massive problem and that's a mechanical problem simply by using too many variables which jump around a lot so there are a couple of approaches from machine learning literature mostly how you can address that and I'll go through these briefly with one slide. One is variable selection models these have been developed for example in biostatistics when people had millions of different genes which they wanted to link to a particular condition then it's quite clear you have one dummy variable as the outcome back in the days you had very few people who were whose genome was fully translated into a matrix and then you had to come up with some models and these variable selection models usually work by selectively kicking out the least informative regressors and they can tell you whether what remains of the model is correlated with your variable of interest and these models would suggest that keeping half of our keywords in the model make sense and interestingly they drop out some of the standard gravity variables which don't add anything to the model. Then out of sample estimation here the idea is that if there's a mechanical overfit coming from adding too many regressors which are artificially correlated with the outcome then that should not work if we take only part of our sample to estimate the model and then use the coefficients to predict the numbers on the rest of the data and one nice method for this which does it in a standard way is K-fold cross validation that means drawing sub-samples out of the data for example dividing it up by ten different folds as they are called and using nine of these to train your model or to estimate your regression and then testing it on the remaining 10% and then going systematically through all ten possibilities how you can do that and then you get kind of yeah pseudo out of sample estimates. What do these look like? So two typical things you would look at are the R-squared and the prediction error. This is the basic model so this is the Maida model. Sorry for the small script. In R-square in specification two ranging between just under 0.4 and up to 0.6 note that here the fixed effects are counted as well. This is an empty model so that includes hardly anything just last year's information and what we would expect from that. So no other economic or social control variables that does just as well as the other model and this is our model. So this is the Maida model basically with our Google keywords and since this is a histogram depending on the standard you set you can call that significantly better. I think it's significantly better in terms of the R-squared. This is when deleting all the other controls just keeping the keywords. So once you have added the keywords and the economic and so on controls don't add that much and this is something I'll come to on the next slide or two slides. And what about the prediction error? So if we were good at predicting outcomes every three or four years and then having some prediction which is very far off reality that wouldn't be good. So what you usually do is that you use the root mean squared error. So squaring the error to make large deviations from reality very, very painful. And what you see here is that these are again the two models in the beginning and here these are our models with Google search terms which have a lower forecasting error. So that looks quite good. Another way to reduce the dimensions to work against this problem of overfitting is to use standard technique, principle component analysis to get some vectors from your data that are or to have a lower number of potential control variables and add these to your model if you just add for example five vectors which can capture 80% of your variation in 50 keywords. So then automatically you have your risk less that there will be an artificial increase in your r squared for example. And if we do that we can look at these principle components and our fifth principle component is what seems to be driving that. The problem with principle component analysis is that it's very, very difficult to interpret these. It's very abstract. What we can see is that the first PC and probably also the second are somehow related to increased computer use. So this is quite reassuring that it's not just increased computer use which is explanatory of migration next year but it is explanatory of increases in the Google search volumes. And with this method we think we are able to kind of disentangle that to some extent. But there will be some work needed on that. Finally we try to put some meat to our rather abstract paper and you perhaps know the Gellop world poll, this hugely expensive data set which is based on surveys in all sorts of countries and they have these nice questions on migration intentions. The advantage of working with someone from the OECD is that they had access to these data. So we could actually test our data against the Gellop world poll questions which are used a lot in the media and have been used by some researchers for nice papers. And we did kind of a horse race using our variables against this one on question which is ideally if you had the opportunity would you like to move permanently to another country or would you prefer to continue living in this country? And if yes, to which country would you like to move? From that you can build a dummy variable and test that. So the Gellop world poll is unfortunately only available on a subsample of our data not available for all years, not available for all countries. But in these countries where we add our data the Gellop question becomes insignificant and our keywords perform as before. So they seem to capture part of what the Google world poll tries to measure with that question. So to wrap up since I'm running out of time our paper tries to show that using such terms can improve prediction of international migration flows and potentially from that we could develop some indicator of something like interest in migration or interest for information about migration so I think that's part of the research process to understand better what exactly we are approximating here yet we think that can help policy makers in several respects. And one of the examples that we are thinking about including is for example evidence on post disaster situations so for example I have a few graphs and if you're interested on the earthquake in Nepal where you saw search volumes in economic terms and migration related terms drop down right after the earthquake two years ago due to lack of power and so on and then suddenly search for a week or two in the aftermath. And in these kinds of situations potentially our approach could be interesting. Thank you.