know you like it long get your minds out of the gutter I meant the videos not that other unmentionable cigar so today a short video about rejection and no shashanim I'm not rejecting you just have much to say about it rejection is denied in the American psychological associations online dictionary as denial of love attention interest or approval and antagonistic or discriminatory attitude towards you or a group of people okay first of all we tend to label nowadays labeling is a contemporary sport so everyone labels label themselves and others toxic toxic is a big a big label the name of the game everyone and his dog and his mother-in-law are labeling everyone else as toxic the neighbors the discarded spouses and so on so forth toxic is not the same as difficult and difficult is not the same as complex you could be a very difficult person I am a difficult person for example you could be a complex person and I like to think of myself as complex but you may not be toxic a toxic person is someone whose effects whose impacts on other people are such that they cause them damage harm and hurt a toxic person is someone who breaks other people regresses them reduces their functioning renders them dysfunctional causes them pain intentionally or unintentional many people are toxic and they're not toxic because they're evil they're not toxic because they mean to be toxic the toxicity is not intentional premeditated it's just who they are like a snake it's toxic reviruses contagious you know and so because we tend to label each other today more than ever people are concerned with how they are perceived and with possible rejection everyone is a spectacle everyone is a theater production everyone is a movie in the making a work in progress and everyone via social media and other means is hunting hunting for feedback everyone is defined by an external gaze attention the attention economy attention is the fuel that keeps the engine that keeps the car of modern society going and so when we hunt for other people's input and then use this input to define who we are other people's feedback becomes the determinant of our identity we live through other people's gaze we experience ourselves through their eyes this is really bad and it leads to anxiety because if you're rejected if you're ignored if you can't see yourself in someone's gaze then you don't exist it's an existential threat so people catastrophize and then having catastrophize they act on their own catastrophic scenarios as if these scenarios were facts and not just possible scripts or fears or anxieties so this is the sequence I don't exist unless and until I'm noticed and seen I need to be seen in order to exist I my identity emerges from other people's gaze through other people's gaze their gaze defines me their gaze infuses me with my identity I have to collect this collective view of me these these eyeballs they delineate and demarcate my boundaries within which I exist and subsist so you know social media companies monetize eyeballs we don't monetize eyeballs but we use eyeballs as identity markers we collect eyeballs it's like a hive hive mind of eyeballs which then serves to define us and if you fail in if you fail in this enterprise of attracting a sufficient number of eyeballs to you then this is a catastrophe and that's why people catastrophize and then catastrophizing is about the future it's anticipatory it's predicting a bad outcome but people are so used to magical thinking that whatever happens inside their heads they confuse with reality if you wish something to happen it will happen if you think about something it will occur if you imagine something it will become reality this is magical thinking we are encouraged to think magically you know the secret of this bullshit so when we imagine a catastrophe it becomes instantly a fact a reality the catastrophic scenarios that we conjure up in our tortured minds the scenarios that say you're not you're not you're not going to be seen you're not going to be noticed no one will pay attention to you you're going to be ignored then you will die obscure forgotten these scenarios these catastrophic scenarios are perceived as overwhelming dysregulating terrifying facts these possible scripts become actual and we act as if they were actual to avoid this terror this fear of rejection you need to adopt a specific posture in life throughout life when and with everyone this is who i am this is who i am it's a take it or leave it proposition because it is a take it or leave it proposition some people are going to take it and some people are going to leave it so i'm going to accept anticipate and accept a certain amount of rejection as ineluctable as inevitable being rejected will not kill me will not kill me i may even grow stronger i am or i am and i can't be liked and accepted by everyone say to yourself these three things number one rejection will not kill you repeat after me rejection will not kill me number two they reject you they've rejected you it's their loss not yours their loss each and every one of us is an entire universe rejecting someone is like rejecting the galaxy rejecting a whole world of emotions and memories and cognitions and facts and fun people who reject are stupid so it's their loss not yours number two repeat after me it is the loss of those who rejected me not mine number three not everyone rejects me it's a fact look around some people don't reject you you some people do reject you some people don't reject you sometimes some people difficult people complex people get rejected more often than accepted but there's not a single man alive or woman alive who are rejected universally with no exception none not one so look at those who accept you and ignore those who reject you not everyone rejects you this proves that the rejection has to do with the people who are rejecting you not with you it proves that you are capable of being accepted and liked and even loved so it's being rejected is not something that has to do with you being rejected is something that has to do with those who have rejected you because you can prove easily that other people are other people accept you so it's it's not something in you that causes the rejection of course everything I've just said when I said it's a take it to leave it proposition this is who I am accept me as I am or go away etc etc certain amount of rejection is never everything I just said is not a license to harm other people to hurt other people you need to avoid harming other people or hurting other people it's the only rule but if you don't harm other people if you don't hurt other people if you're just difficult or complex or just you being you then the hell with rejection life is too short to spend any time or resources or energy on haters and crazies and mad jobs out there just blow on ignore them the vast majority of them are anyhow not worthy of your time attention thoughts or any other kind of resource rejection is about the rejector the person who rejects it's never ever about you remember that next time you're inevitably rejected


A surprise attack with toxic chemical agents may be visible or invisible depending upon the method of dissemination. If a soldier panics now, loses his head, or becomes so concerned with protecting himself that he forgets about his mission, the enemy's attack will have succeeded. This attack did not succeed. These men are trained. They know what toxic chemical agents are, how they act, and the protective measures to be taken against them. Nerve agents are among those most likely to be employed in chemical operations. Nerve agents. You will be shown how you can protect yourself against these toxic chemical agents, GA, GB, V, and others. They are usually clear, colorless liquids that evaporate and form invisible clouds. Nerve agents were first discovered by German scientists shortly before World War II. They were looking for a better insecticide. They found that the highly toxic properties of the new chemicals made them suitable for another purpose as well, warfare. Nerve agents were a deadly addition to Germany's arsenal of secret weapons. May 1945, the Allied armies pushed deep into German territory. Contrary to many expectations, the German defenders did not resort to toxic chemical agents. That they had made preparations for the use of toxic chemical agents on a massive scale, however, can be seen from the following photographs taken by the American occupation forces. In the American occupation zone alone were stockpiles containing over 100,000 tons of chemical munitions.  These aerial bombs were also loaded with GA. Most of the chemical munitions were destroyed by neutralization or burning, but for the nerve agents, this method was considered too hazardous. Instead, they were loaded aboard worn-out ships, towed far out to sea, and sunk. The loading and storage facilities in the Allied occupation zones were dismantled. The factories that manufactured the nerve agents were all in the Russian zone. They too were dismantled, taken behind the iron curtain, and put back into production. Here is a demonstration to show you the rapid deadly effects of a nerve agent on a goat. The dust and smoke you see are from the exploding round. The nerve agent is invisible. The invisible cloud has now reached the goat. In a short period of time, it will be possible to see its effect. The visible symptom here is a loss of coordination. The goat's muscles begin twitching. The trembling and twitching of the animal's muscles will soon become full-scale convulsions. When this happens, breathing becomes impaired, and the goat will die from paralysis of the muscles that control breathing. The total time, less than two minutes. The symptoms of nerve agent poisoning are running nose, tightness in chest, dimness of vision, difficulty in breathing, drooling and sweating, nausea, vomiting, cramps, twitching, jerking, staggering, headache, confusion, drowsiness, coma, convulsions, cessation of breathing. If you detect any of the symptoms shown, stop breathing, mask immediately, take atropine. Although their effect on the body is the same, the nerve agents differ slightly in their physical characteristics. GA was the first to be developed. Unlike the others, it has a faint odor, something like fruity chewing gum. It would probably be encountered in the form of a non-persistent vapor or aerosol. GB has no odor. It is about four times as toxic when inhaled as GA. It also would normally be encountered in the form of vapor or aerosol. V agents are also odorless. The most important difference, however, is their slow rate of evaporation. Although a V agent may be used as a vapor or aerosol, it is most likely to be encountered as a liquid contaminant, producing casualties by contact as well as by inhalation. Unlike most toxic chemical agents, nerve agents can enter the body anywhere. They can be inhaled through the nose and mouth. When they enter this way, they work very rapidly. They can be absorbed through the eyes. This way, too, they take effect very quickly. When absorbed through the skin, they do not take effect as quickly, but the effects are the same. Nerve agents act upon the muscles through the nervous system. Every movement of the body depends upon muscles. Voluntary, those which obey our commands. And involuntary, such as those which regulate breathing, circulation, and digestion, over which we have little or no control. The release of acetylcholine from nerve endings is responsible for muscular contraction. Acetylcholine causes the muscle to contract. Cholinesterase, a second chemical, causes the muscle to relax. The cholinesterase combines chemically with the acetylcholine, causing it to break down into waste products. When the acetylcholine has been removed, the muscle can relax. Here's what happens when a soldier has been exposed to a nerve agent. This soldier doesn't know it yet, but the artillery rounds that have been exploding upwind contain nerve agent. It is already beginning to take effect. He is getting a runny nose, a symptom of nerve agent poisoning. At this point, a soldier trained in chemical defense would have put on his protective mask. This soldier did not. Now he's aware of a tight feeling in his chest. His vision is getting blurred because the pupils of his eyes have pinpointed. The chest muscles are among the first to be affected. They feel tight, unable to relax. They cannot perform their work of pumping air in and out of the lungs. They are growing weaker.  Nerve agents can harm you only if they enter your body. Your protective equipment is designed to keep them out.  It is the best in the world. When properly fitted, it will protect you against inhalation of all known casualty agents under combat conditions. With nerve agents, speed and masking can mean the difference between life and death. Both liquid nerve agent and high concentrations of nerve agent vapor can enter the body through the skin. To prevent this, you will wear protective clothing, permeable, which is clothing that has been impregnated with special chemicals, which will virtually stop all vapor and slow down, but not stop, the penetration of liquid nerve agent. Certain specialized units will be provided with impermeable clothing. This clothing will protect the wearer from contact with liquid nerve agent, as well as from nerve agent vapor. As soon as the mission permits, clothing should be very carefully inspected, and if possible decontaminated. Splashed areas may be cut or torn away. Keep in mind, however, that this lessens the protection against further exposure. Liquid nerve agent on the skin should be washed away as soon as possible with water, and if available, soap. If you are ever subjected to a nerve agent attack, don't stop to ask questions, mask immediately. And if symptoms of nerve agent poisoning appear, you have still another form of protection, your atropine injector. This is to be used only after symptoms of nerve agent poisoning appear, never before. Here is how the atropine works. Normally, the acetylcholine is neutralized by combining with a relaxing agent, cholinesterase. But nerve agents knock out the relaxing cholinesterase, causing the acetylcholine to build up until it paralyzes the muscle. Atropine blocks the acetylcholine, permitting the muscle to relax. Nerve agents work fast, so the atropine must be injected quickly in order that it can go to work before the muscles become paralyzed. That is why the injection is given through your clothing. There are two types of atropine injectors. You should be familiar with both of them. One of them is the auto-injector, a hard plastic tube containing atropine, and an injection needle, which is triggered by a coiled spring. You remove the wrapper. Pull off the red safety cap, press the blue end of the tube hard against the muscle until the needle releases the fluid into the body. For self-injection, the thigh muscles are the easiest to reach. The injection procedure for the atropine sirrette is somewhat different. The sirrette is removed from its container. The plastic cover is unscrewed and discarded. The wire loop is pressed down firmly with a twisting motion, as far as it will go. This will pierce the inner seal at the base of the needle. To make sure that the seal has been broken, the tube is then gently squeezed from the bottom until a drop of the liquid solution appears at the tip of the needle. The wire loop is removed and discarded. The needle is injected into the muscle. The injector is grasped at the point where the needle joins the tube. The tube itself must not be squeezed until the needle has been completely inserted. Then the tube is squeezed slowly until the entire contents have been injected. Atropine will be given at 10-minute intervals. Normally, only a medical officer would give more than three atropine injections. If medical help is not available and the casualty obviously needs it, additional atropine will be ordered administered by the officer or NCO in charge as long as necessary.  Remember, nerve agents can strike suddenly without warning. Keep your protective mask with you at all times so you can get it on in a hurry. Nerve agents can either be seen or smelled. Your first warning will be the symptoms they produce. A runny nose, a feeling of tightness in your chest and throat, or blurring or dimness of vision. If any symptoms appear, stop breathing and put on your mask. Give the alarm. Then inject atropine immediately. You must get used to wearing your protective mask as you carry out your duties. And remember, unmasking is a command procedure. If liquid agent has splashed on your face or in your eyes, it must be removed fast. Stop breathing. Flush your face with water and mask. Even though you may have survived a nerve agent attack without harm, others may not be so fortunate. If one of your buddies is in trouble and your mission permits, you should do what you can to help him. This nerve agent casualty is still breathing.  First, put on his protective mask. He must not breathe any more contaminated air. Inject him with atropine. Then continue your mission. You have done all you can for the time being. But suppose you find a soldier who exhibits severe symptoms of nerve agent poisoning. For him, atropine alone is not enough. First, turn him so that he lies on his back. At this stage, he will be breathing with great difficulty or not at all. Now, every second counts.  Put on his protective mask. Next, give him an atropine injection. Then begin artificial respiration. Tilt his head back. Grasp his arms just above the wrists and place them over the lower ribs. Rock forward and exert steady uniform pressure. This will force the air out of his lungs. Move his arms outward and upward above his head as far back as possible. This draws air back into the lungs. Repeat the cycle 10 to 12 times per minute at a steady uniform rate. Since mouth to mouth rescue breathing cannot be performed, the chest pressure method being used here is preferred. This nerve agent casualty has been wounded. The man giving aid decides that the back pressure method of artificial respiration is necessary so the casualty is turned to the face down position.  His elbows are bent and one hand placed over the other. The mouth is cleared of mucus and foreign matter. With one knee on each side of the casualty's head, he places his hands on the middle of his back. Fingers spread downward and outward, thumb tips almost touching. He rocks forward with a slow even pressure until resistance is felt, releases the pressure quickly, rocks back and grasps the victim's arms just above the elbows. Continuing to rock back, he draws the arms upward until resistance is met, then lowers them and the cycle repeated. The important thing is to maintain an even regular rhythm as close as possible to that of normal breathing. Even though it may take some time for normal breathing to be restored, don't give up. If another person is present, he can take over, being careful not to break the rhythm. It is essential that the air passages be kept free of fluid. If fluid accumulates in the protective mask, it should be emptied out. Again, the mouth is cleared of mucus and foreign matter before the mask is replaced. When the air is no longer contaminated, the order to unmask is given. Now, the mouth-to-mouth method of artificial respiration can be used. This is always the preferred method in uncontaminated air. A second atropine injection is given 10 minutes after the first one. A third injection may be given after 10 more minutes. The administration of atropine should be stopped when the symptoms of nerve agent poisoning begin to diminish. A dry sensation in the mouth is a sign that sufficient atropine has been given at that time. As soon as possible, the casualty's clothing should be inspected for the presence of liquid nerve agent. If any is discovered, it should be decontaminated. This applies to everyone who has been subjected to a nerve agent attack. As soon as the mission permits, troops should inspect themselves and each other for signs of contamination. Following an attack, nerve agents must be assumed to be present until proven otherwise. Protective masks are worn until the order is given for their removal. To determine whether or not it is safe to unmask, the squad leader will order the tests be made of the air. The chemical agent detector kit is used to make the initial test. If the test is negative, the squad leader will have two or three men remove their masks for a period of five minutes. They then remask for an additional 10 minutes. If at any time during this test, symptoms of nerve agent appear, runny nose, constricted pupils, or tightness of the chest, the men will give themselves an atropine injection. When the full 15 minutes have gone by with no sign of nerve agent poisoning, the air can be presumed to be uncontaminated and the order given to unmask. If no chemical agent detector kit is available, the test is made in the following manner. Two or three men will breathe deeply, then stop breathing. As they hold it, they crack the seal of their protective masks for 15 seconds, keeping their eyes wide open. The men reseal and clear their masks. After five minutes, their eyes are examined for constricted pupils. If these are found, the men are immediately given an injection of atropine. If their pupils are not constricted, they again crack the seals of their protective masks this time taking three or four deep breaths. They reseal and clear their masks. Five minutes later, the men are examined again. If symptoms of nerve agent still have not appeared, they will remove their masks for five minutes and then remask for an additional 10 minutes as in the earlier test. If symptoms still have not appeared at the end of 10 minutes, the atmosphere can be considered safe and the order given to unmask. However, personnel should always remain alert for nerve agent symptoms. There is always a possibility of a nerve agent attack. If it should occur, you know what to do. You have learned the characteristics of nerve agents. You have been shown how they act upon your body and the steps you must take to protect yourself. You have also been shown how to assist others. Remember, when the enemy employs nerve agents, it will be for one reason, to prevent you from carrying out your mission, either by killing or incapacitating you or by making you so engrossed in protecting yourself that you forget everything else. Don't let this happen. Continue your mission.


and how the board, how boards had used that. Sure. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good evening members of the board. So chapter 44, section 53G allows any regulatory body in Massachusetts to require an applicant for a permit, in this case a comprehensive permit to pay for in advance, to pay for the retaining of outside consultants. The subject matter for those outside consultants can be as the board deems necessary. Typically a board will seek outside consultants for a skill set that the town might not have or in a small rural town, the town might have no staff. So for example, a traffic engineer or a landscape architect or an architect are typical consultants retained to review comprehensive permit projects. In this case, the board has the right and the authority to require the applicant to pay into a dedicated fund set up by the town treasurer. And that fund would be used for the town to hire a third party consultant. So whether it's a supported services consultant or a traffic consultant or a civil engineer to review the stormwater calculations. The board, they're not mutually exclusive. The board can require an applicant to pay for seven, 10, 12 consultants or just one. The amount to be required is subject to the board's discretion. Generally speaking, especially with a nonprofit, I think the board starts small with a reasonable amount. And if the board needs additional money, then the board can require that. Any unspent money by law has to be returned to the applicant so the town doesn't get a windfall here. The town can't keep any unspent money. Usually, but not always, the board has a kind of a short list of consultants that it wants to hire. And tonight, for example, would say to the applicant, we are thinking of hiring A, B, and C and X, Y, and Z. And the applicant has a chance to oppose the hiring of A, B, C or X, Y, Z, but only under two reasons. One is that that consultant has a conflict of interest or that consultant is not qualified. Those are the only grounds to object. And an objection to the selection of a third party consultant goes to the board of selection in Amherst's case to the council. So the appeal doesn't rest with the board of appeals. And I think I can predict that this board of appeals is not gonna choose a consultant that's not qualified or a consultant that has a conflict of interest. So generally speaking, the applicant and the board reach an agreement on the third party consultants for supportive services, for example, where that short list might not be so readily apparent, the board might actually ask the applicant for some suggestions for a third party consultant. There's nothing wrong with that. And again, I would just recommend, Mr. Chairman, that the amount of money the board asks starts small, 5,000 is usually a good number, 7,500, 10,000 is typically the limit for the first round. If the board isn't sure of who it wants to hire now, then the board could still ask the applicant to pay into the fund, subject to they reserve their rights to challenge the selection under those two limited circumstances. So let me stop there, Mr. Chairman. And I'm happy to go further, but I think. I think that gives us, that's a really good brief, succinct description on 53G and I appreciate it very much. So I see this as, in this case, in this application and with non-profits, there are things that are not up to the same specifications as we find with some for-profit operations, whether it's site design or other things. So they're not final in design. And that's why sometimes 53G can be very, very helpful to the board to get an other opinion on whatever it is that we're concerned about. And so I think 53G is a great tool that we can use appropriately, but only those things that are most important to us and not routinely used as a third-party consultant or peer review on things that we can use, either as town staff or other people to evaluate. I was thinking very seriously of asking for some peer review on the supportive services plan, because it's very important to me, but I would want to withhold judgment until we've had a chance to review the entire plan as a board before we make that request. And we may learn enough about it that we're all satisfied with it without having a peer review, but I wanted to make sure that you understood where I was coming from at this point was my first reading of the peer review without having a full discussion. But so that's where my inclination is going forward, but I want to make sure that we have time to discuss this and we'll decide that later. And of course, at this point I don't have any, I don't have it, I don't think the board has or the staff has a specific recommendations for a supportive services peer review. So we'll leave that to a later point in time after we discuss the supportive services budget in the next meeting. So the last thing that we have on the agenda is to go through the list of questions that were raised for the applicant to get back to or to get back to us on. I just want to make sure that we have them all morning and I've written some down here and I want to make sure that you have it there. So we asked about allocating parking when it snows and we're looking at some kind of an idea of alternatives to just pushing it onto the papers. Give a comparison of the SRO building valley. Okay, I know what this was about. Is there a way to give a comparison of how valley management has the ratio of tenants to parking? So just go through your SRO buildings and just give us the ratio of tenants to park. Oh, okay. Okay, so that gives us a measure for what you do in other places, right? Yep. You're going to provide something on the medical van where it will park and turn around when the handicapped places are occupied. You're going to have a room elevation showing the closets. I know we have the size of the closets but one of the board members wanted a drawing of what it looks like in the room. Smoking pavilion and sightings. Couple of different options, pros and cons of those and now we want chairs. Make sure there's chairs on there. Identifying the, we have to identify the peak roof measurements. I remember there was a discussion about the, my notes don't make sense here, just identify what page on the application has the roof's comparison of the roof with the peak roof and the moderate roof. And I think Mr. Chalmers, yeah. Mr. Chalmers will be able to provide that for the, and we can share that with the members. We'll want to review the management plan and I will, I think referral and selection criteria is something we didn't get a chance to discuss but we're going to have more information on that. Is there anything else that members of the board want to have an answer to before we move on for the evening? And Maureen, is there anything significant that I did not raise? I'm sure there are some things but is there anything significant that I did not raise? I have one which is the RSC will help with transportation options and what are those options? Detailed options. Yeah, Ms. Hardy. I have that Mr. Langsdale wanted to, your corner of the building to the house at 126 North Hampton Road, is that right? But I think Ms. Laughler answered that question with, did you have a number? Yeah, it's roughly 175 feet. We have a survey that shows the existing building but it doesn't have a neighbor's house and I used all of your GIS to approximate. So it's in that range of 175 feet. We can measure things out if we go back to the site. Mr. Langsdale, is that satisfactory? Do you want them to go back and measure and take it and get another? No, that's not a fact. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Thanks Ms. Hardy. Anything else Maureen? And then regarding having a elevation of the, carrier units, I believe that you are proposing a few different size units and therefore would you like a elevation representing each of the types of unit sizes or just one standard? That's a question for the board, I guess. Well, I think there are three different, there are very different styles. It would make sense, we have two options. You can do one in Seattle, this is represent and then assert that these are representative of the different models of each apartment and that might solve the problem. But if they're not all the same, then I think we ought to have a drawing for the clauses for each type of apartment you have. Okay, I think Ms. Brestrup has a question or comment? Yes, go ahead. I think that when you were talking about the elevations of the interiors, you were really specifically focused on the closet and is that the case? So you're really limiting that to the closet, right? That's right. Thank you. I'm not asking, nobody's asked for an elevation of all the everything in the apartment. That's a much bigger job. Yeah, thanks Chris. Yeah, thanks for the clarification. All right, one last, Ms. Harding.  I shouldn't be now. Mr. Langstail asked us to supplement a description of the RSC's role in helping with transportation options. So that should be on our list of things to do. I think Marine just mentioned that too, yeah. Okay, sorry. No, that's all right. All right, I think we've got Ms. Laughler. And I believe Mr. Langstail also requested a site walk up Northampton Road prior to the next meeting. We're leaving, he did and we're not gonna require that. I'm encouraging people to do it, but I'm not gonna require that. And if you wanna get together and do it, I can't do it because of open meeting rules, but if you wanna, I encourage people to do that, I do it often and it's a hike. All right, I think that's pretty complete list of items. And as I said, we will come out with an agenda for the next week working with the applicant, but also with the staff so that we can cover fully the items that we wanna discuss and not have to break it off in half again and disrupt our concentration on these really important matters. So that is useful to us so that we've got as much time as possible to prepare and bring back good detail. Yep, it's in everybody's best interest to do that. So we'll do that sooner rather than later and we'll let everybody know. The next meeting is on the 20th of August and everybody has indicated they can attend. Lastly, I had no other items on this application to discuss. So I would move that we suspend the public hearing on this matter till 630 on August 20th. Is there a second? Second. Is there any discussion? This is a roll call vote. If there's no further discussion, I vote aye. Mr. Langsdale? Aye. Ms. O'Meara? Aye. Ms. Parks? Aye. Mr. Maxfield? Aye. So this will be on the 20th of August. We will continue with this supporting services plan and we will identify the other topics as an addition to public comment that we will have on the 20th. In each of our meetings, we provide the opportunity for the public to comment on any matter that is not the subject of this public hearing. So if there's anybody out there who's attending this meeting virtually and they wish to speak on a matter, not including the matter before the board tonight, we would welcome their comments. Please raise your hand and then if recognize, identify yourself and give, enlarge your comments to three minutes. I don't see any hands raised. Do you, Maureen? Okay. If there's no public discussion, I move that we adjourn this meeting of the ZBA and to meet again on August 20th at 6.30. Is there a second? Second. Mr. Maxfield, any discussion? It's a roll call vote is required. I vote aye. Mr. Langsdale? Aye. Ms. O'Meara? Aye. Ms. Parks? Aye. Mr. Maxfield? Aye. Motion is unanimous, motion carries. I want to thank everybody for their work tonight and we will see you all in two weeks and we'll get out to you before that agenda for that meeting and a list of questions we have for the applicants. Thank you very much.


Everybody forced here ripping 2023 archive six series baseball 20 bucks case number three random teams You can find the random results anytime at leatonsportscards.com so link and chat for you as well Let's go ahead and get started. I think I dropped a link. I did not Sean's dropping the results link where you guys That's my wingman over there. Gotta make sure I got my polo ready Gotta get my slacks pressed Yeah, right, dude, I might just wear shorts I bring like four outfits for a 24-hour trip, you know, I'll be better prepared to just sleep and what I'm gonna wear the next day Like a psychopath Got a Nikoladolo Reds auto to 99 on 2020 Bowman there Nikoladolo Reds, there's a Nikoladolo in every case. It seems like Beast oh he needs he needs more respect Our graph signer Salvador Perez, so he's only been with the Royals. That's gonna go to the Royals to my knowledge. I mean Salvi dude never play for anybody except them Check baseball reference Yeah, only been with the Royals. That's going to the Royals congrats on that one next I've got a white socks Dylan cease 2022 tops auto to 76 white socks Dylan cease Yeah, I can't imagine I just wanted to make sure You know, you know, it's also his current team. So I guess that rule would also just be that it's weird It's weird as I keep forgetting our kind of the archives rules that we made It's confusing. Yeah, I could see you on Yankees. He's just like a good defensive Gary Sanchez White socks Gavin sheets rookie auto to 97 It's 2022 he's like if Gary Sanchez was good. That's how I imagine Salvador Perez It's good as rookie year. Yeah And defensively it just got worse somehow. Yeah So white socks hit a lot White socks consistently probably the best team so far through the two and a few cases here Marlins 2022 tops auto Pablo Lopez 95 out of 99 Dude's Dylan twins though. Ha the world series You do you think they're gonna make it that far illegal at some point? Got a mark can a nice a stadium club auto for the A's 10 of 10 Mark can a stadium club auto 2021 see a lot of seats. We've seen some g-elito. We've seen some Andrew Vaughn Prospects are on different teams of the White Sox as well Adam Fraser to 74 Pirates auto 2018 tops Adam Fraser Pirates auto clutch hit in the ALDS Giants 2019 bowman auto Elliot Ramos the 54 Elliot Ramos Giants 2012 triple threads trot relic the three 19 heritage roof reactor PSA Ben touch these That's pretty good man, so that's pretty solid and a redet risotto here 2021 to bowman auto to 98 angels I Have an Xbox Brett.  I don't have money for a PC got PS5 nice Cossus Red Sox is 74 on a 2021 Bowman auto 2020 Bowman car nice Cossus Go Red Sox Idrace now a 2020 Bowman auto of CJ Abrams the 98 to 79 reds Bowman auto Tyler Stevenson 2017 Bowman Reds Tyler Stevenson Royals now an MJ Melendez prospect auto 9 of 72 that is a 2016 not so 2018 2018 Bowman MJ Melendez Royals to 72 auto Nice the Mitch Handiger Mariners auto to 55 on a 2020 tops card next up on a 2017 first Bowman paper card pirate Shane Bos auto to 68 Relic wrote out Trouty. That's funny. You just got baseball left tonight baseball or sorry basketball basketball and football A's auto to 46 on a 2017 not 2018 2018 Maddelson 18 tops raised now say Josh Lowe 2016 first Bowman paper card there on the auto to 99 Joshua Lowe Josh Lowe as he goes by now raise Actually, none made like zero. I haven't heard talk about it at all A's auto Marcus Simeon to 46 17 Ginter Marcus Simeon A's auto and a one-on-one on the back one of the White Sox Lucas Geolito Grants White Sox facsimile auto below the real auto 2020 Archives right or sorry heritage 2020 heritage there you go White Sox one-on-one Geolito. All right, that'll do it case number four coming up next


Today was about evolving design maturity within an organization and it was awesome. We had probably about 85 people and it was super energetic, great dialogue through the whole day. It's been amazing to have great conversations and detailed conversations about really like solving problems for humans, design, just talking with peers that are interested in what they've heard and what they've learned and eager to share. I've had a ton of conversations throughout the day.