What does it feel like to be successful? Now I know. Welcome back to my channel. I hope you're all good. Today we're going to be chatting about my July, wrap up all the books I read in July and let me tell you it was my most successful reading month of the year so far. I read 13 books in July. The most books I've ever read in a month actually was 14 so we could have like topped it. I didn't even read that much in the last week of the month so we could have we could have topped it. I really I played myself but I am still happy with 13. So if you don't know how I do my wrap ups I'm going to talk about all my reading statistics first and then we'll get into talking about the individual books. So I read 13 books. I read a total of 3,715 pages. This works out to about 119 pages per day which is a pretty good number and an average book length of 285 so I read quite a few shorter books this month but I really enjoyed that. I like reading some shorter books. It gets the numbers out what can I say. So I did have an average rating of 3.26 which is the second lowest average rating I've had so far this year for a month but uh that was that was because of one particular video really and it's all your fault. I hope you're happy because I've told mom. So I don't feel that bad about it was because of like three books I read from one particular video so it's not really that representative. So in terms of the individual star ratings I gave I didn't give out any five stars this month which is kind of sad. I feel like we're gonna get so many five stars in August if you watched my new TBR game, share this plug, if you watch my new TBR game you'll know I have so many good books lined up for August so I feel like we're gonna get a lot of five stars in August so it's okay. I gave one 4.5 star, three four stars, three 3.5 stars, four three stars, one 2.5 star and one one star. In terms of the genres that I read I read three contemporary. I didn't actually read any fantasy this month which fantasy is usually my most read genre so that's kind of crazy. I read one historical, three mystery you love to see it, three non-fiction, two sci-fi and one thriller. In terms of the audience very interestingly nine were adult and four were YA so usually that is like 50-50 but I read a lot more adult this month which I don't know how I feel about that. I really don't know how I feel about that. I didn't realise I didn't read as much YA as usual. In terms of how I acquired the books one was a gift, one was sent from the publisher, one was on script and 10 were books that I previously owned or bought myself so I read a lot of books this month that I bought which is kind of interesting as well like usually I read a lot of books I've been gifted because I am gifted a lot of books very luckily or from publishers but I read a lot that I've bought this month. In terms of like if it's a series or not four were part of a series and nine were stand-alone. I think for the years a whole it's like 50-50 standalone or part of a series and like I'm trying to not read as much series I'm trying to or at least I'm trying to finish series that I am in the middle of because I think for like reading vlogs specifically I start series and then I don't continue them in reading vlogs because I don't think people are gonna care about like seeing me read the second book in a series which I know is stupid and I know you do care but I just start the series and then I never continue on with them. Are you not ashamed of yourself? In terms of author race I read from four black authors, two Latinx authors, one Mexican author and six white authors so that was under 50% white authors which is like always my goal and in terms of author status two were debut authors, four were authors I had read before and seven were new to me. Okay so let's talk about the individual books now I always try to not like listen. I struggle with like not going on about the books for like five minutes even though I've already spoken to you about them in reading vlogs like it's a real it's something I struggle with I really need to contain myself.  Let's talk about the three books that weren't featured in any reading vlog that I kind of read just on my own so first is Freedom is a Constant Struggle by Angela Y Davis. This is a collection of essays and speeches by the activist Angela Davis and this was really insightful I gave this four stars. I listened to the audiobook and she narrated the audiobook so I'd really recommend the audiobook for that purpose because she you know puts the emphasis where she would put it in speeches and stuff and there's also like interviews that she's done with people that's put in this. I thought that this was really really interesting it touched a lot on prison abolition and that's a topic that I'm really interested in particularly like in the context of the United States and the prison industrial complex you know how much money is tied up in prisons how rich companies get from exploiting the prison system also just how entrenched in racism the prison system is and hearing her speak about how prisons particularly in the format that they're in in the US like are not conducive to rehabilitation or you know actually helping society in the grand scheme of things so I thought that was really interesting she also touched a lot on Palestine and the Palestinian struggle which I also really found very interesting to read about so I really really recommend this I found it very very educational and insightful and I would say the reason I gave it like a four star and or five star was that there's a lot of repetition because these are a collection of speeches and like sometimes there'll be like a very similar passage in like three of the speeches so you're just listening to it again and of course it's like relevant because each time she was giving that message to different people in that place but I feel like maybe for the purposes of the book that could have been edited a bit I don't I don't know next I read furia furia this is like a YA contemporary about this girl she loves to play football she plays soccer it's not soccer you know you're gonna play a game girl play it right I love football if you don't know that mean football now I found her loving football and like the journey of her playing football and the sexism that exists and and how difficult it is to play football she has to hide it from her family that was super interesting but a lot of it is taken up with this romance with this her childhood friend who has become a really successful footballer for Juventus and I just like didn't I didn't buy into it I would say at the start there's a lot about the football her playing football and at the end there's a lot about her playing the football but the whole middle section is this romance and so by I was just I just wanted us to talk about the football and like her you know struggling in this very like patriarchal society to like play the game that she loves but then we had a lot of it about the romance and then by the time we got to the end and we finally got more about the football I was just a bit disconnected and like uninterested it wasn't bad like it was fine I gave it three stars but I just wasn't in love with it I just felt like the romance didn't add more than it took away I feel like sometimes wire contemporaries there was this tendency to make it all about the romance when the actual topic that the rest of the book was about was much more interesting to me listen don't get me wrong the romance is fine but I was just like let's just talk more about football that's what I came here for next I read home by Nnedi Okorafa this is this equal to binti which I feel like a lot of you know about this is like a novella trilogy basically and I'm reading this as part of my objective to finish series that I start I made like last month I think or this I saw this month I made a series spreadsheet about all the series that I've started let me tell you I wanted the ground to like swallow me up you good no you're not you're not baby and it's okay I am so ashamed at how many series I've started and haven't continued so this is like an easy place to start because they're short novellas that I can access quite easily so I'm gonna I read this one this month and I'm probably gonna try and finish the series next month even though I I don't think I've loved any of the books like they're okay I've given I think both of them three stars I gave this three stars the basic thing in this binti is going home and discovering what home means to means to her a science fiction and I really like the world that's been built up but I just struggled to read this it took me like a whole week to read it and it's like 160 pages I just didn't really want to read it I think I listened to binti as an audiobook and I think I preferred that but I couldn't find the audiobook for this anywhere listen I'm excited for the satisfaction of finishing this series but I just thought it was okay I really don't have any thoughts about it like it was fun I enjoy the world building I think the writing itself is great but something I something around it I just didn't click with okay and then let's quickly okay I'm gonna try and not spend too long on these I will point you towards all the videos that these are in let's talk about all the other books I read this month so first I read history of what comes next by Sylvain Neuvel I read this in a tri-chapter tag where I read the first chapter of three books and I read the whole book of whatever one interested me most and this was by far the wackiest like oh my god this first this book was made for the first chapter challenge because let me tell you the first chapter of this ends in a way that you're like oh oh shit uh okay too much drama for me this is a sci-fi about this lineage of women who throughout history have tried to get humanity to the stars basically is kind of their their motto in this one they are trying to manipulate kind of like the space race from like the end of world war two into like the 60s I guess I just thought it was so interesting I just thought this was Sylvain Neuvel does some of my favorite sci-fi I think he's my favorite sci-fi author like Fire Long Mile and it was just like strange like it's a difficult book to describe to you but I really loved how it manipulated real events from history and kind of like inserted our main character Mia into it and like she took the credit for it and it just makes it more believable because there is an element of truth to it and you can kind of you know fiction is a lie these books are a lie and every fiction book has to convince us that it's real basically it made it so much easier to do that because you're like Mia was there Mia was pulling the strings Mia was behind it all my queen Mia was there it's a conspiracy theory that I'm actually interested in so yeah I really really enjoyed it it hasn't had great reviews it's strange it's told in a very strange way like there's no speech marks it's like just told through dashes and it's never like this person said like you've got to keep track of who's talking because it's literally just told through dashes so it's like weird I understand why a lot of people didn't like it but I would really recommend it I thought it was very imaginative I gave it four stars and I love Sylvain Duvall and I can't wait to read all of his stuff because I think he's actually a really really great sci-fi author so listen I say don't listen listen don't listen don't listen to everyone saying it's crap because I really enjoyed it then next I read two books for my booktuber scavenger hunt video where booktubers give me prompts and pick what I read and then send me on to the next booktuber so a moment of silence please a moment of silence a moment of silence I don't want to talk about it I don't it was hard enough to talk about this in the vlog I can't even look at the wall without sad pics I read The Seven Dance of Evelyn Hardcastle and I gave this what did I give it 3.5 I gave this 3.5 star this was a five star prediction fuck you know fuck my life many of you probably know this is the story of Evelyn Hardcastle who dies at this party that our family are throwing and our protagonist is waking up in the body of a different party guest every day and he has to like relive the day and try and figure out who killed Evelyn Hardcastle listen I love the premise I love the idea of it I love the vibes so like the first half of this book I was into it like I was like we're going somewhere this is so much fun I loved you know waking up in these different bodies the detective work the complexity but then for me the book just started to trip up over itself and thought it was like so clever and it didn't work it was supposed to give but it did not give what needed to be gave I feel like it spawns so many threads that by the end I was like this isn't satisfying like the way that it ended was like like that's it that's it that's it it also had that thing where like the body like here's how it all happened and I'm just like can we avoid that I know it's hard to avoid that but like let's please avoid that because it wasn't satisfying and then also for that video I read honey girl by Morgan Rogers I really enjoyed this it's I gave it four stars on the trees everyone says it's a romance but I categorized it as a contemporary because I don't think it's really about the romance so we follow in Grace she's like a very kind of like burnout stressed person she's given everything to her career for most of her life and she goes to Vegas and she gets drunk and gets married to just go out there and it's about her not only kind of figuring out this like new relationship in her life but it's about her coming to terms with like the burnout that she's facing how difficult it's been to me up to her parents expectations how she's been on this treadmill for so long and she's kind of reached this endpoint of like her phd and stuff and she's like oh shit what do I do now so it's not really about the romance the romance plays a role in kind of facilitating grace realising stuff but I feel like it's much more about the journey that grace goes on and I thought it was beautifully written like some of the most beautiful writing so I really really recommend this okay then I did a video where I tested out whether beautiful covers means beautiful insides whether if a book has a most beautiful cover whether I'm gonna love that book I read Fat Chance Charlie Vega by Cristal Maldonado and I loved this I gave it 4.5 stars this is my favorite book I read this month this is the story of Charlie Vega who is fat and it's about not only you know the way that like society kind of disrespects her because of that her mom tries to put weight loss shakes on her boys constantly use her to get to her best friend but it's also about like this romance that she has with this guy at her work and it was just really beautiful like I really I really just loved it she's incredible she's a beautiful person her talent and brilliance is beyond I just thought it was such a nice YA contemporary it's like one of my favorite YA contemporaries I think I've ever read I really loved Charlie as a character I loved the storyline I thought it was placed so well I thought it was written so well it had that kind of like softness that I really like in YA that kind of like soft joyfulness that I think is really cute and I would just recommend this to anyone who reads like YA contemporary romances then I read a book that I think is very forgettable I read Circus of Wonders by Elizabeth McNeil I gave this 3.5 stars this is about this young girl her name's Nell right who has birthmarks that kind of you know it's set in like Victorian times so she's very much singled out because of her birthmarks and it's about her being sold into the circus and the kind of life that she leads there now this is like your historical fiction that knows it's clever that knows it's a great book and is a bit more like serious I thought this book's discussion of the abuse that many people faced in circuses in the Victorian times was great particularly after seeing films like The Great Showman which you know everyone loves but that guy was not nice he took advantage of marginalised and disadvantaged people to make money off of them basically so I thought his discussion around that and the toxicity of circuses at this time was very good but I was just a bit bored and I wasn't as into it as I wanted to be the ending the ending the last like epilogue did get me I'm not gonna lie I'm thinking about that right now and my heart I know I don't look upset don't get upset don't worries my heart is breaking a little bit I'm not gonna lie to you but on the whole it just was like a bit lackluster for me and I just wanted something more and it never really gave me more and then I read The Mystery of the Blue Train by Agatha Christie and I gave this three stars so this is the sixth in the Urquiporo series which as many of you know I'm reading in order and listen it just wasn't for me it was just a bit boring and the ending I said in the video how my favourite kind of endings from Agatha Christie are when it's not only the person you couldn't expect being the murder but it's the it's the way that the murder was done that is crazy and like unexpected and this just wasn't that it was just a bit like okay it's about this girl who is murdered on the train that her husband is on but they're like getting a divorce and it's this whole thing and it was just okay it wasn't the best Urquiporo for me then in a wrapped up episode if you don't know I have wrapped up a lot of my books and I unwrapped them and I read them I read Where No One Is Watching by Alyssa Cole I gave this 3.5 stars this one was also a bit disappointing for me particularly because of the ending again so this is about kind of gentrification in Brooklyn this woman have town her street houses the previously owned by black people keep getting bought up very suddenly and why people keep moving in and something sinister is going on and I really enjoyed again like the first maybe even 200 pages of this it was really good really slow suspense building like a really good thriller and at the end it went fucking bonkers and I just feel like if you're gonna go fucking bonkers it needed to happen a bit earlier because it was just a bit like too much too quick like it was like I wasn't expecting that at all I felt I feel like I then needed to continue that kind of suspense for slow pace or be crazy a bit earlier I would have accepted either of them but for me reading this I was like oh my god and then these last three books I'm just gonna like speed through I read them because they are Kylie Jenner's favorite books for a video I will link that like all these videos if you want to go check it out I read Only Love Is Real by Dr. Brian Weiss this is a psychiatrist he believes he can connect you to your past lives we all have past lives and if you have a pain in your shoulder is because you were stabbed in the back in Roman times I gave it one star I didn't buy into it didn't really like it didn't even like the writing itself the guy needed a co-writer and it just wasn't good wouldn't recommend it don't waste your time then then ladies and gentlemen I read Pretty Little Liars now I gave this three stars listen this was shit it was awful it was trash but I enjoyed the reading experience I'm not going to lie to you I did enjoy the reading experience the rules don't apply it was awful but like I kind of admired it for its awfulness these people are awful it's problematic as shit but I enjoyed reading it please don't judge me and then finally I read The Four Agreements by Don Miguel Ruiz this is another like spiritual self-help book about the secrets behind the world I thought it was interesting but I also felt like it was kind of just like saying common sense and like passing off as like oh my god I'm so genius it was like don't take things too personally always do your best I'm like girl these are things we just need to like know like they're just common sense they're just normal human morals I didn't think it was anything super insightful so I gave it 2.5 stars so there we have it that is all of the books that I read this month plus obviously the three that I don't own physically so a great month in terms of volume for me but not in terms of like ratings I didn't have many like great books in terms of ratings but I'm still happy with how the month went let me know how your reading month went down below in July I would love to know any plans you've got for August as well and if you've gone to the end comment a train emoji for the mystery of the boot train comment that down below thank you so much for watching as always I really really appreciate it I cannot thank you guys all enough for your support lately I just love making videos and I'm just I'm just enjoying it so much so thank you so so much and yeah I'll see you very soon in another video bye


Now, since we are talking about elemental semiconductors, so we will see whether I can further classify elemental semiconductors because earlier what we have done, we have classified the semiconductor itself. We have classified the type of semiconductor which are intrinsic semiconductor, extrinsic semiconductor, we have say elemental and compound semiconductor. So compound semiconductor is not something which we are studying in this particular class. So since we are discussing about the elemental semiconductor, let us further classify elemental semiconductor and see whether there are different kinds of elemental semiconductor also. So there are two kinds of elemental semiconductors. The first one is intrinsic and the second one is extrinsic. So when I say intrinsic, what I mean to say a semiconductor which is in purest form, let us say it is germanium semiconductor. So entire semiconductor is just made up of a single element germanium. What I mean to say when I talk about extrinsic semiconductor is there will be small amount of impurity added to it. For example, arsenic may be added inside the germanium or silicon semiconductor. So these impurity will tremendously increase the conductivity of the semiconductor. That we will discuss little bit later. Right now let us talk about intrinsic semiconductor and see how it works. So we are trying to gain more insight with respect to how it works and what happens inside the crystal lattice or how the electron comes out of a particular nucleus and things like that. So since we are taking example of silicon and germanium only, these are group 4 elements. We know that the nucleus will have plus 4 charge. So let us say we have silicon and germanium lattice, it will be like this. All of you draw this. So every circle represents a nucleus. And these branches which I am drawing, these branches represent some sort of bond. It is a covalent bond, electron sharing is happening. So one line represents one electron is plus 4, plus 4, plus 4. So we have one electron here, one electron there. So like this electron sharing is happening and silicon or germanium complete their octets. So you can see that electrons are tightly held inside the covalent bond. And these electrons cannot just break free on their own. So what will happen is that if you supply energy, now you can supply energy using different means. You can supply energy using EM wave, you can just give heat, you can heat it up or you can apply a large amount of electric field. So there are multiple ways you can generate energy and give it to the electron. So once let us say this electron gets sufficient energy, what will happen? This electron will just leave the bond. So bond is sort of broken. So there will be a site which is open here and electron can come over here and set. So this electron which was there earlier at this site becomes free and this electron can come under the influence of external electric field and can conduct electricity. At the same time this hole, you can say that this hole is positively charged which has plus E because earlier it was neutral. So if minus E charge comes out, plus E will remain. So this hole will also attract the neighboring electrons. So this electron suppose jumps over there like that. So hole will get created here. So in a way hole is also moving, getting it. So hole also moves and electron also move. So in the intrinsic semiconductor there is a current due to electron movement and current due to hole movement. So the total current is due to both of them. And because of the charge conservation, I can say that the amount of electron current will be equal to amount of hole current. Because number of holes that are getting generated per unit time is same as number of free electron getting generated per unit time. So the rate of generation should be same. So like this you can understand that how an intrinsic semiconductor works. Any doubts both of you? Anything? No sir. No. Okay tell me one thing, why carbon is not a semiconductor? Carbon also has the same crystal lattice. Why carbon is not a semiconductor? But silicon and germanium are the semiconductors. So do you like need a lot of energy to remove the electron? Why? See you are not too sure. So see the thing is when it comes to carbon, the outer most shell electron, they are forming the bonds and they can only become free and start conducting. The inner shell electron will not come out. But when you compare the outer most shell electron of carbon with outer most shell electron of silicon and germanium, carbon is much closer to the nucleus, the outer most shell. So because of that you need lot of energy and the energy becomes more than 3 electron gold. So carbon is classified as non-metal and not the semiconductors. So this is a brief of intrinsic semiconductor. So we do not use intrinsic semiconductor. All the useful application happens for the extrinsic semiconductor only. So we can discuss extrinsic semiconductor in greater detail now. Now extrinsic semiconductor like what we discussed earlier, you can put impurity in extrinsic semiconductor. All of you write down extrinsic semiconductor. So it is nothing but you are adding impurity to the intrinsic semiconductor. So it is intrinsic plus a small amount of impurity. Now impurity does not mean that you can add anything. So although the name is impurity but it is very selective kind of material that you have to add. So there are two ways you can add impurity or two types of impurity which you can add in intrinsic semiconductor and make it extrinsic. These are you can add trivalent, if you add trivalent impurity on intrinsic, this will become p-type semiconductor. And if you add pentavalent, you add pentavalent impurity to the intrinsic. This will become n-type semiconductor. So these are the two types of extrinsic semiconductor that we are going to discuss. Let's see first what happens if I add pentavalent impurity to a pure semiconductor. Let's see how it affects the overall conductivity. So we will first talk about n-type semiconductor. So arsenic is one of the example of n-type semiconductor. So the amount of impurity that you add is very less. It is like 1 out of 1 million atoms. So like this you add the impurity. But then even though it is just 1 out of 1 million, there are so many atoms that even this kind of concentration of the impurity can also generate good amount of free electrons that we are requiring for them to conduct the electricity. Let's see how it works. Suppose you have impurity which is pentavalent. Now of course since it is very less, 1 out of million sort, so a pentavalent nucleus is bigger chance that it will be surrounded by the tetravalent elements. The impurity will be surrounded by the actual atoms because they are much more in numbers. So now tell me how many valence electron a pentavalent element will have? So tell me how many valence electron the pentavalent element will have? You are not able to hear me? So they will have 5. You have problem in answering some questions? Kondaneya, why I mean you can't answer the simple question which I am asking here. Let's keep it interactive. Let's not keep it like a monologue. Keep answering whenever I am asking. Otherwise you can as well watch a recorded lecture what is the point of taking a live session, isn't it? Okay sir. Anyways, so pentavalent element will have 5 valence electrons. So the 4 electron will get shared by the 4 neighboring tetravalent elements. What will happen to the 5th valence electron? Will it create a bond? Not too sure. It will not create a bond. So it will remain in the orbit of pentavalent element. Only 4 electron can create a bond. So this electron is not participating in the bond. Now tell me whose energy will be more? This electron which is not participating in the bond or the electron that are participating in the bonds? This one, right? Electron if it participate in a bond its energy will go down. So if you draw an energy diagram for this n-type semiconductor, let's say this is energy, right? This was the normal so to say valence band and this is the normal conduction band. This one. This is conduction band, the upper one and the lower one is the valence band. Now can you show the energies of the electron? All of you, there will be electrons like this. What are these electrons? These electrons have participated in the bond. These valence electrons have participated in formation of bonds. Where the energy level of these electrons will be which are not participating in the bond formation? In the higher one. Will it be in the conduction band? Inside the conduction band? This is conduction band. See now if electron is in the conduction band it means that the electron is free to jump from one nucleus to other. Is this electron free to jump from one nucleus to other? It is not. No sir. It is not. But then its energy is higher than the valence electron but is not yet in the conduction band. So there will be a layer at this location. But then the good thing about this particular electron level is that it requires very very less amount of energy for these electrons to jump to conduction band and start conducting. Getting it? So you do not need to now put the valence electron in the conduction band because you have these electrons which already have higher energy. So you just need to supply this much energy. You know this energy is approximately 0.01 electron volt. So we have increased the conductivity of this material by doping it or putting impurity of pentavalent element. All of you clear about it? So but for it to go to the conduction band it should enter like the bonds. So for that one electron should be removed and for that you need energy so that is more than 0.01 electron volts. No this electron you are not just removing electron from one of the atom. See if you remove this electron from here some of the electron will get attracted and come here. What you are doing is you are just making it free. It is loosely held to this nucleus. It will go to some other nucleus and some other electron will come back here at plus 5 site. So like that you are just increasing the mobility of the electron. You are not creating a charge as such. Or you are not taking electron outside of the material. It remains inside only. But you are increasing its movement. So this is n type semiconductor. Now let's see what is so special about the p type semiconductor. So in p type semiconductor we are doping a trivalent element on tetravalent element. So let us say I am doping boron or aluminum. This is plus 3. So what will happen here is that plus 3 has only 3 valence electrons. So it will create boron like this and it will have an incomplete octet. So there will be a hole like that. Getting it both of you? Yes sir. Now this hole will try to attract the electron. So electron will leave one of the site and go to the other site. And this will move the hole here. So like that movement of the charged particles will start and you can say that electricity is not conducted. Getting it that's how the p type semiconductor works. And let us try to build the energy diagram of p types. So let's say this is the normal valence band and we can say that this is normal conduction band. These are the electrons that have participated in the bond formation. Now can you guess how we can draw the energy levels further? So technically you don't need like any energy to like move it right because anyways there will be a hole. So by itself the electrons will start moving. Okay now tell me one thing. If there is a site the energy will be there with respect to the site also. So this hole which is there that hole itself will have some energy. And when electron is inside that hole then it will have a certain energy. Whose energy will be more a site without or a hole without electron or when electron reaches the hole. Which one the energy is more? The when the electron reaches the hole it completes the octet. So energy of the hole goes down. So the hole has slightly higher energy if it doesn't have an electron. So we can say that this is the level for the holes. Now for the electron to start conducting all electron have to do is to jump from the valence band to where? Yes sir. No they have to just jump to the hole. That's what it is happening right?  So it doesn't need to go to conduction band to conduct electricity. It can just reach up to the site of the hole and electricity will get conducted. So even this energy is 0.01 electron volt. Are you guys clear? Yes sir. And one more thing there is a thermal equilibrium condition. The derivation is not in our syllabus but then the formula is given. So we will just take it as it is. Write down thermal equilibrium condition. This tells us that number of electrons per unit volume multiplied by number of holes per unit volume is equal to n i square. So you understand right? Any n h are the electron and hole concentration in a particular type of semiconductor. And n i is the concentration of charge carriers in the intrinsic semiconductor. Suppose I take silicon semiconductor so it will have a fixed value of n i. For silicon it has a fixed value of number of charge carriers per unit volume. For germanium fixed value of n i. But when you add impurity inside it and number of electrons and number of holes they will get changed. But the product of that will remain a constant which is n i square. Yes sir. Fine. Let us take a numerical. Both of you do this. Suppose the pure silicon crystal has 5 into 10 raise power 28 atoms per meter cube. Pure silicon has this much concentration of atoms. It is doped by one parts per million of pentavalent arsenic. You need to calculate number of electrons and number of holes. What is given is n i equal to 1.5 into 10 raise power 16 per meter cube. Do this. What are we done? Sir is n e 5 into 10 to the power 22. Yes. And n h will be 4.5 into 10 to the power 9. You got it? Yes sir. Okay. Good. So basically one part per million is one out of 10 to the power 6. So if you are putting a doping of arsenic like that. So you can count number of arsenic atoms per unit volume. That is nothing but number of free electron that can get generated. Because every arsenic atom will give you one free electron. So n e will be nothing but number of arsenic atoms per unit volume. This divided by 10 raise power 6. Now we have n i and n e and n e into n h is equal to n i square. From there you can get the value of n h. So numericers like these can get asked in your exams.


So, Corey Bush appeared on CNN for an interview and she was asked a really important question. She was asked if a criminal justice bill came up, but it excluded ending qualified immunity. Would she be willing to compromise? And I was delighted to hear her answer. She said quite frankly, no, I'm not. This is what I want to hear. I want to see progressives in Congress make demands. I want to see them draw lines in the sand. I want to see them plant their feet firmly in the ground and say, I can't support this if it doesn't meet my requirements, my criteria. And I think that it's pretty common sense to have a bill related to criminal justice that doesn't include an end to qualified immunity is absurd. I mean, this really is one of those issues that has support across the aisle, right? So there's no reason for any criminal justice bill to not have qualified immunity. So I have no issue with her answer there. However, there was another question that the CNN host asked to Corey Bush and her answer here wasn't necessarily that great to me. She asked, okay, so if you have these demands and whatnot, will the squad actually bind together and make their demands have teeth? Will you stop bills from getting passed in the way that Joe Manchin does if it is the case that it doesn't meet your demands? To put it lightly, Corey Bush's answer here killed my soul. Take a look. Question I think Congress is facing right now is, would you accept a qualified immunity alternative that would hold police departments accountable if it means getting the George Floyd police reform bill through Congress, even if it's not 100% of what you initially wanted? Right now we need to end qualified immunity period. That's my stance. So you are not willing to compromise on that? So we compromise on so much. We compromise, we die. We compromise, we die. We compromise, we die. I didn't come to Congress to compromise on what could keep us alive because it holds police officers specifically accountable because the thing is this, if you don't hurt people, if you don't kill people, if you are just and fair in your work, then does qualified, do you need the qualified immunity anyway? You know, so the thing is, there's all of this safety net. The safety net shouldn't be there. But let me say this, where are all of these special protections for nurses and for other people in other positions that do very dangerous work? That's just trying to help people. So no, I will not compromise on that. We need to end qualified immunity. And the reason why there is this open lane for compromise is because they see that people will do it. I didn't come. St. Louis did not send me here. St. Louis being number one for police murder in the country per capita and has been that way for years. The people did not send me here to save their lives by falling down on the one thing that we need at the most. No. And I, you know, I don't want to belabor this and I hear the passion in your voice on this issue. But if it comes back to the house with a compromise on qualified immunity, would you vote against that? I'm not prepared to support that. Senator Joe Manchin from West Virginia has essentially, you know, used what seems to be a veto power against a lot of progressive priorities, including some of the ones that you've mentioned. But in the in the house, Democrats have this two seat majority. There are six members of the squad, of which you are a part. What's stopping you from flexing that same power for your agenda? You just said you would vote against a compromise on qualified immunity. Are you prepared and the rest of the squad prepared to use that kind of veto power that you have if you vote as a block?  But I can't speak for the rest of the squad members at the end of the day. My sister Ayanna rep Ayanna personally says that all the time you vote alone and you're voting for your districts. So you're voting for the people who voted you in, you're voting their needs and their If Ayanna Presley actually said that, you should never take her advice again, Cory Bush. That is not a good way to get anything accomplished in Congress. You vote alone. I understand that there is a need to make sure that you are meeting the demands and the needs of your constituents. You would deny that, but there's a lot of overlap when it comes to what your constituents need. Every district in America would benefit with Medicare for all. Every single black and brown person in every single district in America would benefit by seeing qualified immunity come to an end. So sure, you have to make decisions at the behest of your constituents. But if you ever want your demands to have any teeth whatsoever, if you don't bind together, you're going to accomplish absolutely nothing. There's a reason why, whenever something passes the House, every single article that talks about it says, well, it's effectively going to be dead on arrival in the Senate. Because Joe Manchin and Kirsten Sinema, they always bind together. And they're so willing to torpedo bills that it's just this default assumption of, well, this isn't going to pass because Joe Manchin isn't going to support it. Now, I'm not saying that you should be defeatist and overly obstructionist and end up stopping good things from getting passed because they don't meet 100% of what you want. But there comes a time when you have to fight. And if you're not willing to bind together with other progressive lawmakers, you're never going to get anything that you want. Now I can rationalize the explanation that a lot of them gave for not blocking the COVID Relief Bill because there were a lot of progressives that were upset that they didn't block it in the House when the minimum wage of $15 an hour was excluded, myself included. But I get them saying, look, we just, we need to get it out as soon as possible. We had to pass it. People needed that money and we couldn't wait any longer. Sure, it wasn't what I wanted, but we had to get it out there. First of all, that's not necessarily what progressives are saying. Oftentimes, they praise that bill as being incredibly progressive, one of the most progressive pieces of legislation in decades, even though it did fall short. But if you're going to say that about that bill, the COVID Relief Bill, I can give you a pass if you truly believed that we just had to get that out as soon as possible. But when it comes to binding infrastructure bill, this is going to be a test for them. If they don't actually make their demands crystal clear, then it shows you that they're not going to be very effective. Now, part of wielding your power effectively, there's a learning curve to that, right? You have to build up your confidence. You have to learn what to do, how to make deals, how to bargain. So it's going to take time. I'm not expecting them to be strategic masterminds as soon as they get into Congress. But there are some things that I think are pretty basic, common sense things. Binding together is the one thing. Because if you don't bind together, then the squad, you know, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, it's not really going to be threatening to corporate Democrats. They're going to continue to steamroll you. And we desperately need substantial changes. Now what worries me is that the obvious weakness from progressive lawmakers, it is hurting other progressives who are running for Congress. I've seen so many people post online, oh, well, this is why I don't even care if Nina Turner gets elected, which is going to make my head explode to think that people actually have this conclusion. If anything, you know, you should fight harder to get someone like Nina Turner in there who could be a possible leader. But you know, a lot of people think, look, here's the thing. If you're going to run as a Democrat, this is going to happen every single time you're going to be overly deferential to Democratic Party leadership. And, you know, the only way to actually get progressive lawmakers in Congress that are going to fight and not be subordinate to the Democratic Party's demands and what the leadership of the party wants is you have to get someone in there who is either an independent or part of a third party. And to that my answer is my criticism of Corey Bush and members of the squad like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that they don't fight as much as they should. I think that also is applicable to Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders, I think he is more effective legislatively speaking. I think that Bernie Sanders, you know, now being in a position of power where he is the Budget Committee chairman, sure, he can force votes on things like a 15 dollar an hour minimum wage. But by and large, he still has been pretty deferential to Democratic Party leadership. And sure, it would be great to see a Green Party in Congress or some Socialist Party member in Congress. But the reality is that once you get to Congress, you're still going to have to caucus with the Democratic Party. You're not going to be able to caucus with the Republican Party if you're a socialist, right? You're not going to find any common ground with them. So you're still going to get assigned to committees by the Democratic Party. You're going to caucus with them. You're going to try to build support for your legislation, finding co-sponsors within the Democratic Party. So the same issues that make members of the Democratic Party seemingly weak in the face of Democratic Party leadership and the establishment within the Democratic Party, that's going to be applicable to members of a third party or an independent. I mean, we see it with Bernie Sanders. So, I mean, you know, we see this and it's easy to get disappointed. But I don't want you to take away that the situation is hopeless. I want you to take away that this is more evidence that we need an inside outside strategy. There needs to be more organizations on the ground pushing for change. And we shouldn't look to elected progressives as the leaders who are going to spearhead these movements inside outside. That's the key strategy. This is what everyone will say. Professor Richard Wolff, Cornell West, you can't just, you know, vote people in Congress and expect everything to be copacetic. Expect them to fight for you because that's not the way that this works. We've seen with Obama that when we just like vote someone in power and expect them to do the right thing, it's not going to work out that way. Now, I'm not in any way comparing, you know, members of the squad to Obama because that's that's different. Obama actually was a corrupt sellout who took money from Wall Street and large multinational corporations. Whereas members of the squad, I think that the reason why they're ineffectual is because they don't know how to wield their power. They're relatively new when it comes to Congress and that's not to make excuses for them. They should be fighting harder. But I think that what this gives us the motivation to do or should motivate us to do is build up that pressure on the outside. Sure, continue to elect more progressives on the inside and make sure that we do everything in our power to expand the number of elected progressives in Congress. But on top of that, we can't expect them to just be the leaders. We have to be the leaders, organized labor and organized socialist organizations actually have to be the leaders. It should be the grass roots that dictates the terms, not actual members of Congress. This has to be bottom up. And I think that when we acknowledge that and we actually learn how things are changed, you know, fundamentally and comprehensively in this country, then, you know, what's happening will make sense. But of course, you know, I do expect better from members of the squad. And I've been incredibly disappointed, particularly in this congressional session, because now is the time when the squad for the very first time actually can kind of like show everyone who they are. And they've obviously not stepped up to the challenge, which is really disappointing. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that I think that their sellouts that doesn't mean that I think we should waste our time dedicating energy into primarying them. I mean, everyone should just be automatically primary to begin with. So that is a moot point. But we shouldn't get disappointed. Rather, we have to apply pressure from the outside.  So I'm going to I'm going to give up. No, if anything, if you're disappointed, you should be even more engaged and actually motivate people in your area to apply pressure. Again, outside inside strategy, this is what we have to do. So I mean, look, I'm not going to go out of my way to beat up on Cory Bush, AOC and members of the squad. To me, if I see that I'm disappointed in them, which I am, I'm not going to go out of my way to tear them down. I'm going to try to build them up. I think that people like Cory Bush and AOC, Jamal Bowman, members of the squad, their intentions are absolutely pure, but it's easy to get misguided and, you know, to be afraid of what can happen if you actually are out of line. The Democratic Party can very easily crush you. And so speaking up is something that's difficult. It requires a lot of courage, but honestly, all it takes is one. All it takes is one person to be a leader and to be a wrecking ball and to rally the troops and the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus leadership, Mark Poe, Ken and Primula Jayapal. They very clearly don't want to rock the boat. These are good people who are pushing for good things, but they obviously don't want to rock the boat. And we need someone who's going to rock the boat. So my hopes is that when Nina Turner gets in there, she actually will continue to be a firebrand and apply pressure to the Democratic Party establishment, because, you know, it's not the case that going along to get along is going to benefit you. You might have a longer career in politics, but whether or not you actually accomplish what you set out to accomplish, you know, doing what you've been doing, just going along to get along isn't the way to do the things you wanted to do. So I'll leave that there. You know, this ain't it. If you vote alone, then you are going to be absolutely ineffective in Congress. And if you truly want to accomplish things and get what you want, you can't listen to what Ayanna Presley said here. You've got to bind together and block votes, block legislation. If it doesn't include what you want, do exactly what the corporate Democrats like Joe Manchin and Kristen Sinema are doing. Otherwise, you're not really going to be taken seriously. You'll be irrelevant as it relates to legislation. And we don't want that to be the case. It's early in this congressional session. So what I would say that progressive lawmakers should do is turn it around and flex that muscle that they have because they do have it. They just haven't shown it yet. And that's frustrating, but that's what they need to do. If they want to get what they set out to accomplish, actually codified into law, I don't leave that there.


Oh sorry, I did not notice you. I was busy buying something from Amazon. They seem to have everything on their side and the process is so effortless. How do you think they built such a software system? Well, I think one major component is their inventory management system. They keep track of their inventory in such an intelligent way. What do you mean by intelligent? Can you elaborate? So inventory management is the act of measuring the amount, location, pricing and the mix of products available. So when we go to the Amazon homepage we see that their inventory gets updated based on current purchasing and seasonal trends and fluctuating customer demand. Hence logistics and analytics play a large part in inventory management. So it is very interesting to see how my Amazon homepage could be quite different from yours. Amazon customizes my homepage based on the items I viewed as well as my shopping history. Yes, that's true. My homepage will be based on my shopping history. Moreover, the ease of buying on the platform is also essential. The payment gateway is another module in the platform which offers ease of payment for both the buyer and the seller. Payment gateway is a service that authorizes electronic payments like online banking, debit cards, cash cards, etc. Payment gateway acts as a middleman between the bank and the merchant's website or application. When a user wishes to make a payment, the Amazon website sends the encrypted card information to the payment gateway. Then the gateway confirms the validity of these details with the bank and the required amount of money gets transferred from user's account to the Amazon account. So we looked at two components, the inventory management system and the payment gateway. There are many more components which make up the website. Yes, that's true. So many components make up any commerce website such as Amazon. So here is a question for you. We discussed that an e-commerce website has several components. Could you list a few of them? You can pause the video, write down your responses and then continue. In this video, we discussed various components of a large software system. For example, the inventory management system, the payment gateway and so on. So it's important for us to think in terms of components. Software can typically be divided into several addressable components called modules which are all integrated to satisfy the overall requirements.


All the way at the top of the Apollo Saturn stack on top of even the launch escape tower is a tiny little silver ball Which I neglected to paint silver on this model, but this little silver ball played a huge role in Apollo launches This is what the Apollo command and service modules looked like before they launched on a mission to the moon or to low-earth Orbit if it was Apollo 7 or Apollo 9 the cylindrical service module held all the consumables for the mission And the command module is this gumdrop shaped module up top that was the only piece of the spacecraft to actually come back Through the atmosphere at the end of a mission on top of that was the launch escape tower or the launch escape system The launch escape system is this lattice like structure and the four solid rocket motors that would fire to pull the spacecraft away from an exploding rocket if anything went wrong in the initial phases of launch The four solid rocket motors actually had more power than the redstone rockets that launched the first two Mercury suborbital flights In the event of a launch anomaly these four rocket motors would fire and pull the spacecraft free of an exploding rocket and land the Astronaut safely in the ocean or if need be although it wasn't ideal they could land on land But pulling the spacecraft free of an exploding rocket during a launch abort wasn't enough There had to be some way of knowing exactly where the spacecraft was going and what angle it was flying That is where the little silver ball at the top of the launch escape tower comes in that little silver ball is bored with eight holes And they feed information to the cue ball the cue ball is similar to a pitot tube on an airplane a Pitot tube measures airspeed in flight and feeds that information into the flight computer where the pilot can see it The cue ball does something similar It doesn't measure airspeed, but it does measure air pressure and that's actually where it gets its name Pressure is sometimes referred to as cue so air pressure ball cue ball It's not just referenced to it looking like a bald man's head But the cue ball didn't gather data just for data's sake it gathered data for a very important reason for one It could actually help the rocket stay on course because the cue ball measured air pressure coming from all sides It could tell if the rocket was off its nominal trajectory by as little as an eighth of an inch It could actually tell the engines all the way down at the bottom of the first stage to Gimbal to correct for that off nominal trajectory But there was an even more important role that that cue ball played and that was in a launch abort In the event of a launch abort the cue balls measurement of air pressure on all sides would help determine Which way the spacecraft and the launch escape tower were flying making sure that the crew landed safely Away from the launch tower So this tiny little barely obvious silver ball at the very top of a Saturn Apollo stack played a huge role But if you look at it before certain launches in video or in images you might see it look a little bit bulbous That's because it had to be covered right until the last minute Just like pitot tubes are covered right before an airplane leaves the ground and with good reason if those holes Become blocked at all the data can be faulty and this can lead to big problems Insects building nests in pitot tubes have brought down full jets So the risk of something clogging those holes and having a real problem developed was significant The cue ball cover was two halves of a sphere held together by a two-inch rubber band with a razor blade Positioned behind the band pinched between the halves of the cover a wire rope was connected to the top and bottom of that razor blade and to both halves of the cover and that rope was then rooted through a Polly on the crane at the top of the launch umbilical tower and directed down a tube on the side of the structure It was connected to a weight housed inside that tube that in turn rested on a lever controlled by pneumatic valve The valve is actuated from the launch control center Rotating downwards and allowing the weight to drop down the tube pulling the wire that cut the elastic That separated the halves of the cue ball cover to expose the cue ball to the air This might sound like a super intense Over-engineered solution to the problem of covering the cue ball before launch after all airplanes just take off the cover manually before a flight But this couldn't happen with a Saturn launch to the moon Because the cue ball played at such an important life-saving role in a launch abort It had to be kept covered until the very last second It wouldn't do to manually uncover it before launch There's still a chance for something to block one of those holes The cover was only removed in the final five seconds before lift off And it had to be done remotely and it had to be sure that it would separate That's why the solution to the cover and separating it was so intense The cue ball as well as the entire launch escape structure as well as the boost protective cover over the command module Were jettisoned around the two-minute mark into the flight Once it was clear that there was no need for the launch abort system It was thrown away and the crew went off on their way to the moon a lot of you guys have asked me about the cue ball So I hope this answers your questions And this is the kind of question that I love so let me know what kinds of things you would like to see me dig Into in future episodes down in the comment section below and because I can already hear you guys asking Yes, this is a Pete t-shirt. I have limited edition Pete t-shirts now and I'm super excited I've got the links you need to buy one yourself in the description box down below So definitely check that out you guys love Pete you guys have asked for it So I gave you Pete merch Pete merch will be available for a limited time So definitely check that out sooner rather than later as always leave any other questions comments anything in the comment section below Be sure to follow me on Twitter and Instagram for daily vintage space content and with new episodes every single week Be sure to subscribe right here. So you never miss a video


تشرف بل اشتغالي بالعلم ولا تبغي به ما عشت يا بدا بدا وياله من شراف العظيم الحمد لله رب العالمين له الحمد الحسن والثناء الجميل وأشد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له يقول الحق وهو يهدي السبيل وأشد أن سيدنا ونبينا محمد صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وأصحابه والتابعين لهم بيحسان إلى يوم الدين أما بعد إن شاء الله تعالى المشاكل الذي سأتحدث عنه هو الخلاف وعلاجه الخلاف الذي يتحدث and kills to it إن شاء الله تعالى المشاكلة جدا وكذلك جدا ونستطيع أن أستطيع أن أتحدث عنه من all of its corners أو أن أتحدث عنه جيدا بسبب أنه أصبحت كبير ولكن ما سأفعله إن شاء الله تعالى هو أن أتحدث عنه بشكل جيدا أول هو دمه الافتراق كيف الله ربكت وخبرت عن هذا المشاكل والأخر إن شاء الله تعالى هو حقيقة الافتراق ومحقيقة التفرق ما هو the reality and what is the true definition of the word افتراق because if a person doesn't perceive something the way it should be perceived and doesn't have a correct understanding of it what will happen is they will assume something that isn't افتراق disunity, he thinks this is disunity and something that isn't disunity he would think it is it is not and vice-versa so إن شاء الله تعالى we require and we need as أصولين they say الحكمة على شيء ونفرق عن تصوره to give a ruling on a matter there has to be perception there has to be a correct perception of it إن شاء الله تعالى I am going to start by talking about ذم الافتراق ذم التفرق and then I will speak about حقيقة التفرق later افتراق is the ضد الاتلاف افتراق is the opposite to اتلاف which is to be unified is to be disunified is to the opposite to it is to separate them become groups and cut off تهديب اللغات الأزهري مقايس اللغة لسان العرب and Arabic dictionaries they mention that افتراق is the opposite to اتلاف and there are many نصوص evidences from the كتاب and the sunnah that urge us to become together and to come together and there are many evidences that tell us to stay away from becoming groups and dividing الله تعالى وعتصم بحب لله جميع ولا تفرقوا وذكروا نعمة الله عليكم إذ كنتم أعداء فألف بين قلوبكم فأصبحتم بنعمتي إخوانا وكنتم على شفا حفرة من النار فأنقذكم منها كذلك يبين الله لكم آيات لعلكم تهتدون والتكم منكم أمة يدعون إلى الخير ويأمرون بالمعروف وينهون عن المنكر ويؤمنون وتؤمنون بالله والتكم منكم أمة يدعون إلى الخير ويأمرون بالمعروف وينهون عن المنكر وولائكهم المفلحون ولا تكونوا كالذين تفرقوا واختلفوا من بعدما جاءهم البيينات وولائك لهم عذاب عظيم في هذه الثلاثة الله تعالى تعالى وعتصم بحب لله جميعا كل منكم يدعون إلى روب الله هذه الآية المفلحة التي تأخذنا هو الله يدعوننا as a whole كل منكم يدعون معا ويدعون إلى روب الثلاثة المفلحة التي تأخذنا هناك شيء التي يجب أن نتدعون يدعون إلى لا نستطيع أن نكون بمعروف ونستطيع أن نكون بمعروف للمعروف يجب أن نريد يجب أن يكون شيء التي نعروف وهذا هو روب الله لذا المعروف if it's not based on the روب الله it is not Mahmood it's not praiseworthy لأن الله يتكلم when Allah spoke against the Jews Allah said about them تحسبهم جميعا وقلوبهم شتة when you look at them from the apparent they look like they're together but their hearts are not together meaning they don't believe the same thing so being those who are together for the sake of just being together when there is nothing they're not together on a correct ideology it's not praiseworthy ابن كثيرا حما الله said regarding this ابن كثيرا said أمرهم بالجماعة الله ordered us in this verse to become a جماعة a group ولهاهم أنا الله تبارك وتعالى prohibited us عن التفريقتي to become groups and to divide وقد وردت الأحاديث المتعددة بالنهي عن التفرقي والأمر بالاجتماعي they have come many evidences that have prohibited us from becoming groups and has ordered us to unify وليقتي لف and to come together كما as it's in في صحيح مسلم من حاديث صحيح ابن أبي صالح عن أبيه عن أبي حرارا ابن كثيرا said as it's been narrated صحيح مسلم from the صحيح ابن أبي صالح narrated from his father أبي صالح who narrated from أبيه that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم has said إن الله Verily Allah يرضى لكم سلاسن Allah is pleased for you three ويصخط لكم سلاسن and Allah dislikes for you three يرضى لكم Allah is pleased for you pay attention again أنت عبدوه ولا تشيخوا بي شيء that came first the thing we unify upon is this that we worship Allah alone and we do not associate partners with Him وأنت عتصموا بحبن الله and now we all hold on to the rope of Allah together ولا تفرقوا and do not become groups وأنت ناصحوا من والله الله أمركم and that you guys give nasiha advice to whoever Allah makes leadership over you ابن كثيرا they said ويصخطوا لكم سلاسن he said that the prophet said Allah dislikes three for you ورضى قيلة وقال he said she said وكثرة السؤال asking too much وإضاعة المال and also wasting wealth ابن كثيرا I want you to understand please it's very important he said وقضومنات لهم العسمة we have been promised that we will be infallible we will be errorless when عند التفاقه when we all unite when we're together we don't have no mistakes we're errorless as a whole not individually but as a whole it's impossible that we all together come together on a matter and that there is mistake with us we're infallible وقضومنات they have been promised لهم العسمة that they are infallible عند التفاقه من الخطأي from mistakes كما وردت بدالك الأحالي المتعددة أيضا as many extensive narrations have indicated that وخيف عليهم and it was scared for us an iftiraq ابن كثيرا it was feared for us that we become groups and divide and cut apart ولكتلاف وقد وقع ذلك and that matter took place في هذه الأمة في هذه الأمة ففترقوا they became groups على ثلاثة وسبعين فرقا they became 73 sects the umma is two touch brothers and sisters أمة الدعوة أمة الإجابة أمة الدعوة the disbelief is fall under it أمة الإجابة are those who have accepted the message which one is it referring to أمة الدعوة أمة الإجابة أمة الإجابة is referring to is talking about the Muslims 73 sects is not the disbelievers it's the Muslims so they will be divided into 73 sects منها from that 73 is what فرقا ناجية إلى الجنة a sect who are going to be saved and they will be taken to Jannah ومسلمة and they will be protected from من عذاب الناري from the punishment of the Hellfire وهم اللذين and they are those anyone who reads that ayah and looks at that hadith or even the speech of Ibn al-Kathir underlines that point it sticks out for you because he gives you who are the ones who are going to be saved from the Hellfire and those who are going to Jannah of course he took it from the prophet عليه السلام he said وهم اللذين and they are the ones على ما كان عليه رسول الله it is the one who is upon not which the messenger was upon وعصحابه and his companions so the division and the disputes and the Khilafat that are occurring are due to the people not taking their evidences and their religion and their belief from where from the message عليه الصلاة والسلام and they are not backing it up with the understanding of the Sahabas now the question that arises as existed I am slightly going to go off topic which is how do we recognize that which the prophet was upon and his companions that needs it that's the question itself if that is what will save us from becoming not dividing and not becoming groups that question that arises is how can we be how can we be saved or how can we recognize that which the prophet and his companions were upon so we don't become groups and sects أبو قاسم التيمة رحمه الله يازبقوا الحجة في بيان المحجة he says in his book when he came to the hadith of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم من كان على مثل ما أنا عليه اليوم واصحابي because the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم he said ستفطرق أمتي على 73 فرقة my umma will be divided into 73 sects كلها في النار all of them are in the health I accept one but the Sahabas they said يا رسول الله who are the saved ones the prophet said whoever is upon that which I am upon and that which my companions are upon أبو قاسم التيمة قوام السنة he mentions how that part of the hadith he explains to you how to recognize what the prophet and his companions were upon he says فلا بدا it is necessary من تعرف ما كان عليه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم واصحابه وليس الطريق بعرفته إلا النقلاء فياجب الرجوع إلا ذلك he says it is necessary to know that which the messenger was upon and that which his companions were upon is necessary of course it is because it's what's going to make us unite upon the truth it is what's going to bring us back to the haqq and then he tells us وليس and there isn't طريق ومعرفته there is no way to recognize that which the prophet was upon and the companions إلا النقلاء except through the text the way to recognize that which the prophet was upon and the companions were upon is by the text and he will explain that more in details insha'Allah فياجبه due to that it is obligatory on what الرجوع إلا ذلك to take the matter back to those people who are أصحاب النقل the people who can transmit it to you his speech goes on وقد قال النبي the messenger said لا تنازع الأمر أهله do not dispute the people who have the leadership of a battle he is trying to refer to here as the people who know the prophet and the companions traditions don't dispute with them they are the ones that are going to transmit it to you the reason why أبو قاسم التيمة رحمه الله he is bringing this and it is needed is because there are those who try to base their belief system on their logic and their intellect who think by coming with what the brain shows them التحسين والتقبيح العقلي wherever that mind beautifies and whatever that mind says that is ugly then that's the religion that is the religion أبو قاسم التيمة رحمه الله he is saying no the way to know that which is going the prophet was upon and his companions is by text good فكما يرجعوا في معرفة مدهي بالفقها that if you wanted to know a masala that the scholars of fiq believe who do you take it back to you take it back to the فقها you don't take it back to the لغويين you don't take it back to the صرفيين you don't take it back to the بولغا you don't take it back to you take it back to the فقها if you need a مسألة فيقية if a madhab of فقها believe a matter take it to its people good why فقها الذين صاروا قدوة في هذه الأمة إلهي للفق ويرجعوا في معرفة اللغة if you want to know a language based matter who do you take it back to إلهي للغة to the people of the language ويرجعوا في معرفة نحو if you want to know a grammatical matter if you want to know a grammatical matter you take it back to the علماء of the language إلهي للهو فكذلك I like that يجيب أن يرجع في معرفة ما كان عليه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم واصحبه إلهي للنقل والرواية the same way if you want to know that which the messenger was upon and the صحاب was upon bring it back to the people of text أهل الحديث أهل الرواية the people who know the prophet لأنهم لماذا عُنُوا بِهَدَ الشَّأْنِ they gave effort and time to this field واشتغلوا بِحِفضِه and they worked hard and memorizing it وَتَفَصْ وَتَفَصْ وَتَفَحْ حُسِي and they also researched they checked وَنَقْلِه وَنَقْلِه and it's text they looked at the hadith they picked it up and separated it this is the one who takes out and transmitted it from us to us and then he said وَلَوْ لَاهُمْ if it wasn't for them لَنْ دَرَسَنْ عِنْو this knowledge would have perished of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم so here we take from these brothers that the path to know that which the messenger عليه الصلاة و السلام was upon is by what by going back to the hadith of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and the Sahabas and the Ulama who are more who are trusted who are reliable say this is the method of the salaf we'll take it from them now going back to the topic again Insha'Allah الله تبارك و تعالى سنة القرآن إن الدينة عند الله الإسلام the religion of الله تبارك و تعالى is Islam there is no other religion which Allah accepts و مختلف الذين and the people who have disputed one another from the people who were given the books previously they disputed one another one when they disputed each other after knowledge came to them and the reason why they disputed one another was it was due to transgression it was exceeding one's boundaries و من يغفر بآيات الله anyone who disbelieves in the verses of Allah فإن الله السنة و الحسام الله is fast in his judging this آية إبنو كثير الله بغى بعضهم على بعض part of them transgressed in the other group فختلفوا they disputed each other في الحق in the truth they disputed one another in the truth وآي لتحاسدهم because of hate that they have towards one another و تبارضهم an enmity you see و تدابورهم and turning their backs on one another pay attention brothers فحمل بعضهم بغض البعضي the hate that they had the hate in which they had for one another it took them for one another فحمل بعضهم بغض البعضي الآخر على مخالفة because he hates this person personally he hates him his hate has automatically forced him to go against this person good في جميع أقواله in everything that this person says because I don't like this person I'm going to go against everything he says و أفعاله his actions و إن كانت حقا even if it's the truth even if this person brings a matter which is a right and I I won't take it if you go to قوائد النوراري بشيخ الإسام إبنو تيميا and also in his مجمل عتقائز للسنة he brings that إبنو تيميا and also in his منهج سنة النبوية the 35th volume paid 100 around the إبنو تيميا رحمه الله mentions عليه رحمة الله he mentions that I'll use this آية with another آية وقالت اليهود ليست النصار وقالت النصار ليست اليهود the Jews and the Christians were both saying about one another you're upon nothing the others were saying you're upon nothing and they're all reading the book meaning إبنو تيميا said that the haq is with them they have the haq with them one might have the haq he won't say look I don't personally agree with you as an individual but wallahi this matter is your haq because the haq is Allah's property of the believer and haq وضالة المؤمن the haq is what it's the Allah's property of the believer wherever he finds نعم so they don't do that الله تبارك وتعالى he said in another آية إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ وَكَانُواْ شِيَّا عَنْ those people who divided their religion and they became groups less than them في شيء محمد you have nothing to do with them إِنَّما أمروهم they're matah is to Allah ثم يُنبِّ أم بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ Allah will tell them the day of judgment what they used to do this آية has a different form of recitation الله تبارك وتعالى إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ there's another which is إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ there's another which says إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ this two seems like it is not referring to because when you say إِنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِيْنَهُمْ it can have the meaning which is those who have a group have become Muslims and another group became non-Muslims هل يجب أن أخبر المسلمين أو يجب أن أخبر المسلمين؟ إبنه كثير، وإبنه جنينة طبري، يجب أن يخبر المسلمين أيضاً إبنه كثير، يجب أن يخبر المسلمين أيضاً أن الآية عامة، الآية جنون، في كل مجموعة ليس المسلمين أو المسلمين، في كل من فارق دين الله anyone who goes against Allah's religion وكان مخالفاً له، and he opposes it فإن الله بعث رسوله، الله has sent his messenger بالهودة with guidance ودين الحقيقة and the true religion ليظهره، to make it apparent على الدين كله of all religions والشرعه واحد، the prophet's legislation is one لختلاف فيه، there's no differences in it ولفتراقة، فما اختلاف فيه anyone who goes against the prophet either within Islam or he leaves him in totality by leaving Islam وكانوا الشيعة، and become groups اي فرقاً كأهل الملل والنحل like the groups and the sects وهي الأهواء والضلالات فالله قد تبرأ رسوله الله has freed his messenger from those people بما هم فيه not which they are upon وهذه الأمة تكقو، وهذه الأمة and this umma as well so this aya according to Ibn al-Kathir رحمه الله تعالى and also before him ايه، they took that this aya refers to the Muslims as well but I want you to analyze this aya because there's a powerful matter وشعاله تعالى I'm going to elaborate on it more later الله تعالى وكانوا الشيعة those who have differed in their religion and they became groups the question that arises and opposes itself comes up is the umma having different views in the religion and that's going to happen the Sahabas did عبد الله يبنو مسعود رضي الله تعالى عنه عبد الله يبنو عباس Disputed of the aya of the Muslims عبد الله يبنو عباس believed that the lambs here is met by jima sexual intimacy whereas who whereas عبد الله يبنو مسعود believed that it's مجرد in lambs just by the mayor touching so according to عبد الله يبنو مسعود understanding of the aya of the Muslims إذا قمت بالصلاة فرقسروا وجوهاكم ويدكم إلى المرافف the last part of the aya الله says進ه لا بس تبل مساء or you touch a woman from عبد الله يبنو مسعود رضي الله عبد الله يبنو عباس as رضي الله 2 different views come out of it according to عبد الله يبنو مسعود رضي الله it comes as any person who touches a woman she breaks his window and according to عبد الله يبنو عباس it wouldn't unless sexual intimacy occurs so 2 views come and there is differences in their view هل هذا what the eye is referring to? how is it not? there's something in the eye that needs to underline which is what? إنَّ اللَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُ that's not مذموم في حديناتها to differ in the religion is not something that is blameworthy in and within itself guess what is blameworthy? وَكَانُو شِيَعًا we become groups that's when it becomes blameworthy عبدالله المسعود did he have a group that followed him and said we carry the flag of Abdullah al-Mas'ud and where the ones who believe this is that what they said? no did Abdullah al-Mas'ud say the same? no they all had that views in that matter and they were what? and they were still هدود المحبة and insha'Allah I'm going to talk about the khilaf that occurs in the أصول and the furor of course that needs to be looked into but I'm talking about nowadays you find a message it may pray more than 11 ركعة روح and another message it may pray 11 and a group would say our message pray this much and your message pray this much try to make two groups out of it two groups each group is the 11 ركعة مسجد and this no these are مسائل that is khilaf stands and to make it into a group and to make it into sects إبنو تايم رحيم الله in his Kitab قواعد المرانية he says that person is a حزبي that person is who tries to make matches which the umba are allowed to differ in and the differing was way before us and it will forever stand to make it or where you place your hand a person puts his hand on his chest and another one puts it in his stomach and another puts it in his navel you can have a view which is strong and you can say this is the strongest view but to divide the umba on this matter or who puts his knees down first to make it where we believe we can put our knees down first and you don't believe it this is not matters from the religion and you make it groups you fall under this ayah so what we do is you believe you can put your hands down first you believe you can put your knees down we can discuss it if you want like when we stand up and if we differ you have the aray and I have this view and we are allowed to and it's من ما يسوغ فيه الخلاف and it's from those things which خلاف can occur from نعم إِنَّ اللَّدِينَ فَرَّقُدِينَ وَكَانُوا الْشِيعَنَ لَاَسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيِّنْ إِنَّ مَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهِ ثم يُنبِّئون بما كانوا يفعلون there are also many hadith regarding دم التفرق الله تبارك وتعالى سيس أنا بهوريرة تردي الله وتعالى عنو في صحيح مسلم the messenger of Allah peace be upon him which I narrated إن الله يرضى لكم ثلاثن ويسقط لكم ثلاثن which I read also there is another hadith أبوهوريرة narrated صحيح مسلم the prophet said من خرج من طاعة من طاعة anybody who gets out of obedience وفارق الجماعة leaves the جماعة الجماعة المام الشاطم من الكتاب الإعتصام he brings many views what the jama'a is meant by views but the jama'a is meant by the Muslims as a whole and a leader anyone who cuts up from them فمات أنه يدايز ما تميتة جاهلية that person will die a death of jahilia الإمام القرطم من الكتاب المفهم لما أشكل فيه صحيح مسلم remember there are two قرطمي as well as أبو عبد الله القرطمي أنا بالعباس القرطمي and he's the teacher أبو عبد الله القرطمي he's his teacher he said حديث من خرج من الطاعة وفارق الجماعة he said طاعة طاعة ولاة الأمر وبالجماعة and this is what concerns us وبالجماعة the jama'a is meant by جماعة المسلمينة he leaves the Muslims he cuts up from them and stands by himself good on what he leaves the Muslims he cuts up from them on what جماعة المسلمينة على إمامي the ummah have all united upon this person as a leader you come and you cut things I don't agree أو أمر مجتمع في عليه or a matter in which they have all come together they believe in this matter they've all united and you cut them from them if that person dies مات ميتة تنجاهلية he will die the death of جاهلية the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم صلى الله عليه وسلم حالية إمام you can say ترمذي both ways are correct that's that's how you say his name عمر ابن خطاب رضي الله يتعالى عنه يسادة the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم من أراد من أراد anyone who wants بحبوحة الجنة anyone who wants to enter jannah فليلزم الجماعة stay with the jama'a فإن الشيطان مع الواحد الشيطان is with one وهو من الإثنان أبعب and it's far from two the more the number becomes the more الشيطان is further away the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم brothers what's the what is the results that we get if we disunite and we become groups and sects the first one is اخواني ولا شكة ولا ريب is عذاب punishment and guess when the punishment comes to us from our own selves we will make each other taste pain the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم this I came down on him قل هو القادر على أي أبعات عليكم عذاب Allah is the one who is able to send on you a punishment من فوقكم from above ومن تحت are duly come from beneath your feet الله is able او يلبيسكم شيعن or Allah makes you into groups ويوذيق بعضكم بأسمع and group of you make the other group taste pain اوضر الله says look كيف وصرف والآيات look how we turn over the matters and we clarify the issues to you all لعلكم يفقوا so you guys can come and think and ponder of what's been said here so the prophet I said three things has been said to him and all the time he was saying اعوذي بيوتشيك or Allah see a refuge in your face he was saying all of the others الله تبارك ويتعالى he will not punish us with one punishment that's going to come with all of the ummah at once no that will never happen maybe Allah might punish a group somewhere and the other punish the group won't Muslims might be punished on one قطر من اقتار الأرض a part of the land we might be punished a group here a group there like in one one punishment that encompasses all the Muslims it will never happen but guess what will happen to be put into groups and فرق حزاب and sex and then الله تبارك ويتعالى he said ويوذيق بعضكم بأس بعض and we make each other taste pain فولانا says this about you لقور عبدالله عبدالله عبدالله he said فرق وحزاب يكفر بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم بعضهم أطفال وهي محمود، يعني كيف يمكنني التفكير بين one of which is good The difference occurs from two places And sorry, three places The difference occurs from the speech, the belief and the work If the difference is an difference which is by speech We differ by one another by speech But the basis of both of us The belief and the principle we're picking up from is the same But what we're differing upon is An interpretation which is allowed within the boundaries of the Sharia It is not an interpretation where you bring whatever you want The Khilaf is within what? Boundaries which are set Then that person's the Khilaf is this one That Khilaf can occur in what? That Khilaf can occur in فروع المسائل Matches which are fiqh They can occur in it Which they are the most an occur But in the principle The Khilaf is differing And everyone has his own understanding of عقيدة That's not tolerated in the Sharia Are you with me? And within the Sharia There is kullيات and there is جزيات If the person agrees with us in the kullيات The general principle of the عقيدة But they happen to somehow He differs with us in a sub-brat of عقيدة The scholars also have given excuses to him But they haven't allowed the differences of that issue But they excused that particular person And they don't take him out of the fold of أهل السنة What I mean by it will become clear The Khilaf occurs brothers in أصول and فروح If the Khilaf occurs in the أصول It's not tolerated And everything for that is The Imam is شافئة ر.ه. The Imam is ذهبي Go to see her على بلو ملاء The fifth volume واسسة الرسالة The publication وانترسالة با شعب الاربعوت جد كتابه سير على بلو ملاء سير على بلو ملاء با يمابه الزهبي The fifth volume The first biographies يمابه شافئة ر.ه. The first biographies شافئة محمد يدريس الشافئة The pages after Six, seven pages later He brings a speech which شافئة يسد شافئة يسد والله يباي الله لأيفتي العالم For a scholar to give fatwa فيقال For it to be said أخطأ العالم That this scholar got it wrong خير الله is better for him من أي تكلم Then for him to talk about ايباته فيقال He then said about him زديق He is a person who left religion وما شيء And there is not a matah أبغض إلي من الكلام وأهلي There is not a matah That is more hated to me than أهل الكلام and its people شافئة يسد قبل أن أصل لها ومع ذلك شافئة يسد ومع ذلك That there is a matah If a person does a mistake We will only say أخطأ فولا He got it wrong And there are matahs If he does What do we say زندق He said Which is He leaves the religion because of that mistake شافئة يسد He put a footnote And he said هذا دالل This is an indication على أن مذهب أبي عبد الله نتيب أبي عبد الله من محمد يدرس الشافئة مذهب is what أن الخطأ في الأصول A mistake in the أصول ليس كالخطأ في الإجتهاد في الفروع It's not like a mistake if you do in a matah اجتهادية Which is فروع إمام الشافئة I didn't believe that So we realized from here That the differing that occurs is because people differ in something If the differing is based on a matah It's a فروع It's a فروع matah إجتهاد Then he said راجحا مرجوح أخطأ فولا And the other person said But you are wrong لا بس As long as we don't become شيعنة لحزب There's nothing wrong with that لكن أصول When we differ in matters Which are أصول In and within itself That it's in and within itself is what That in and within itself is مذموب إمام الشافئة Is going to give us A good understanding Of what it means To do a mistake in أصول In this كتاب شعطمي سيز وذلك أن هذه الفرق إنما تصير فرقا When will this When will a group Become opposite to أهل السنة That they're not part of it anymore And they are a group That stands Just like أهل السنة Stands And they are opposite to them When does that happen شعطمي سيز وذلك أن هذه الفرق إنما تصير فرقا It becomes grouped بخلاف للفرقة To the same sect في معنى كلي When they oppose them In a general Rooted principle قاعدة كليا They oppose them In a particular field And there are five matters إن شاء الله That I'm going to mention مسائل الأسماء والصفاد مسائل القضاء والقدر مسائل أسماء والحكام مسائل الصحابة And مسائل وعدي والوعيد Those are the five things Every books of عقائي Talk about Any of those five Five Which I'm going to bring Later إن شاء الله مسائل الأسماء والصفاد مسائل القضاء والقدر مسائل الأسماء والحكام مسائل الصحابة And مسائل وعدي والوعيد Those are the five A person, for example Does not like the Sahabas Does he go against you In a fundamental matter أمر كلي He goes against it This He now automatically Stands shoulder He is opposite to فرقة أسماء In the same sect Because one of the رؤوس One of the matters Which makes you أهل السنة Which is a matter Which is أصل He is going against it في الدين وقاعدة من قاعد الشريعة لا في جسئة Not in a sub-brunch What does he mean by a sub-brunch? The sub-brunch can be two things شاوطين it means The first one It can mean That the person agrees That the Sahabas are what Are virtuous And he respects All the Sahabas But what does he say He says I believe عالي should be giving Presidents to عثمان This is a mess أهل السنة أهل السنة Have different in it Before that person Can not be taken out of أهل السنة But is he wrong? أهل السنة says Weak view But if he says I'm not to put عثمان I'm not talking about virtue I'm talking about leadership خلاف Virtue, virtue Not خلاف I'm talking about virtue He says I see I'm not virtuous Then عثمان أهل السنة Have different in that matter أبي عبد الله أحمد أحمد He was asked A person who says that Do you take him out of أهل السنة He says no Between who عالي and who عثمان But then the person says No I put عالي before him أبو بكر عمر This is أمر كلي Does that make sense أمر كلي لا في الجزء The second meaning That the juz'ee can mean That the juz'ee can mean Is مساء الفقية Fak matters That they differ with you on Good إذ الجزء والفرء الشاد Is a geography I'm just going to give you one example and I'm summarizing That the سلف أك العلمة جمعان They used to There was a time when A mistake occurred in a matter Which was جزء In a matter أرقيدها و يجب أن يقوم بإمكانه إضافة إلى أثمات عقينة ولكنها جزئية و ليس كذلك و الإمام الزهبي ينسر على منوبلا رحمه الله يكونوا أحد الأصول أو يمكنوا الدقائق المسائل أو يمكنوا أن يكونوا جزئي كل ثلاثة of these names are given إذا هبي سر أباقنا تارجامات the biography of أبو أبو إبنو خزيما إمام الأئمة you guys know إبنو خزيما right إبنو خزيما has a book called كتاب التوحيد مجلد كبير it's a big volume و قد تأول في ذلك in that book he has translated he has interpreted حديث الصورة there's a particular حديث كون حديث الصورة خلق الله قادم على صورة الرحمن he is interpreted in a different way he is interpreted in a different way he is interpreted in a different interpretation فليعضر he is excused this is a problem عقيدة right he said فليعضر he should be excused why من تأول بعض الصفات he is interpreted he is excused anybody who interprets a particular a particular حديث regarding the characteristics of Allah he won the characteristics he will give a different meaning to it but the aspect he accepts that all Allah's characteristics should be left without any resemblance but there's one particular characteristic he pulls it to a particular meaning he should be excused و أما السالف when he refutes because his view can still be refuted فأما السالف فما خاظوا في التأويل بالأمر و كفوا و عال و فوضوا علم ذلك إلى الله و رسولي and then he goes on to say من أخطأ في اجتهادي everybody who does a mistake in his striving مع صحة إماري he has good intention و توقيه بالتباع الحق and he is trying heart to heart to follow the Haq أهدرناه و بضعناه و بدعناه و يكون مبتدع لقل ما يسلموا it will be little for those who are saved from us من أئمتي from the scholars it will be little رحم الله الجميع ما الله هم mercy upon all of them بمنه و كرمي one of the scholars who did that مجاهد إماري جبع سفيانة ثوري رحم الله و تعالى he said إذا جاءك التفسير مجاهد و فحسبك به if the Tafseer of Mujahid comes to you that's sufficient for you مجاهد is the one who said عرص المصحف عالمجا عباس in 3 عرضان I opened the Muschaf on Abdullah Ibn Abbas 3 times و قفوا عند كل آية I stopped him at every verse I said Ibn Abbas what is this verse mean what is this verse mean what is this 3 times finished again finished again finished 3 times سفيانة ثوري he said if the Tafseer of Mujahid comes to you فحسبك بي that's sufficient for you مجاهد when he came to the ayah و جوه يومي بالناظرة إلى ربها الناظرة the one that means that we don't look at Allah the day of judgment he said تنتظر ثواب ربها waited for the reward of Allah he's interpreted على غير ظاهرها other than his apparent meaning but the answer is مجاهد accepts to interpret the characteristics of Allah should be left and it's apparent meaning شبولي سابي بريتايم I know I promised that I was going to be the last quote and this is going to be honest the last quote امرتايما رحم الله he said امرتايميا he had a dispute he had an argument when he wrote his Kitab عقيدة الواسطية he had a debate but this is what he said after the debate because they tried to say that امرتايميا which is a very common statement that he said about him that امرتايميا he does takfir on anyone who opposes his belief امرتايميا did it and that امرتايميا makes bid'aaw of everyone who opposes his belief امرتايميا does it as well he will say himself so they said to him okay امرتايميا do you believe يوبك عقيدة الواسطية anyone who doesn't stick to everything that is in there امرتايميا is مبتدع امرتايميا is مضل he said this is what he said وليس a no no وليس كل من خالف في شيء من هذه الاعتقال no in the case he is speaking for himself وليس and it is not كل من خالف في شيء من هذا الاعتقال anyone who opposes me in this book عقيدة الواسطية يجب ان يكون هاليك and that person is destroyed no it's not the case فإن المنازعة because the person who is arguing with me or is opposite to me قد يقول مجتهد that he might have an argument he might be striving مخطئة who done wrong يغفر الله خطائه الله will forgive for his mistake وقد لا يقوله بلاغه في ذلك the matter may have not reached him من العلم ما تقوم به علي الحجة the proof has maybe not reached him for the evidence to be established on him وقد يقول له من الحسلان maybe he has righteous actions ما يمحوا الله به سيئاتي that Allah may wipe away from him his shortcomings he may have good acts of good opinions that Allah will wipe away from him his shortcomings the day of judgment هذا الشيخ وليسان بيطايمه this is what he say with his own speech إن شاء الله تعالى due to the short time I will conclude there إن شاء الله تعالى سبحانك اللهم وبحمدك أشدو الله إلا إلا الله ستبفرك أتولي أم الله


Y'all really thought y'all had a brother that I wasn't gonna go seven for seven. Well, here's number seven better late than never Yes, then flops and I'm saying flops. Oh also in the comment section below Let me know if y'all want me to venture outside of just the NBA very curious about that Because I think we can react to a little bit of everything You don't even have to be sport related. Can we just relax and watch some compilation some try not to laugh some try not to cry a Lot of different stuff. So let me on the comment section if y'all cool with me venture it out a little bit There's only so many NBA highlights we can watch. You know Sam So now we have the most dramatic flops and NBA history. I'm a I'm me. This might be a big controversial I'm okay with a flop Honestly, I'm okay with the right amount of flop now if somebody's going above and beyond that's what I'm not okay with it But I'll let you know the ones that are that's fine and the ones that no, come on, bro Come on. What are you doing? What are you doing? Leave a like subscribe if you knew I've been uploading here KLT4Q and Kenny every day it seems like Yeah, it's been tough. Let's go Oh a young Gordon Hayward, it's Tony Allen see anything Tony Allen related. Call me a fan. He was Hold on. I gotta rewind that way. I gotta rewind that one. He wasn't touched at all And the ref is like three inches away from them and he's like, you know what that's all I really need My boy Tony Allen said he need to act the career when it's all said and done What's this? Chris Boss just jumping If you can get the call to work, then there's no problem. Oh I remember this one. I remember this is the playoffs, bro I remember this and you would have swore he got shot by a sniper in the arena. What's the screen about Tyson Taylor? You know I'm saying Yes contact was made but why is LeBron says acting like he got smacked in the back of the head Whoa, Cory Brewer The the antics the antics the antics The atrix that's the word I was looking for. Oh, oh, oh another playoff. Oh, we're gonna have a lot of LeBron We're gonna have a lot of LeBron a we They're they they're getting blown out in this game That's a Trisky time to elbow and LeBron with the whole the matrix and Then DeMarie Carroll gets it with a tech because LeBron wants to fly that's all right That's a no right one This is not a okay way This is not okay with the man was not touched whatsoever young Marcus smart The man hit the ball go now we hit the ball and Marcus smart That's a marker smart favorite.  Did he just deck a man? Is that Baron Davis? Bear Davis cut it out cut it out B.D. What are you doing? All right, Vio Yo, what the heck? Did they call that offensive? Lance evens is the greatest flopper ever say I mean I don't mean that he did it the most I mean that hold on I gotta pause because I don't want to miss nothing I mean that when he did do it. It was what beautiful beautiful I remember one time he flopped the maybe that'll be on this on this list here He flopped he waited until you got the foul call. He's just got right back up He was on the floor reacting like ah, ah, and then he heard the whistle. He's like, okay. I'm cool Beautiful beautiful that man. He's an active career, but it's there. He's killing it overseas right now LeBron gets an elbow from Dreymon and Dreymon's like come on dog. What is your own? LeBron you're too he's just LeBron is just too much of a Beast physically to let that actually hurt him, but it's part of the game. He got a spout call Oh, but Dreymon went from the one Make it final LeBron to act at all wasn't even touch Wasn't even touch wasn't even close either This is the one I'm talking about this is the last it was a clip watch watch Okay, so he gets hit with a screen. He hits himself. Wait, is this the right clip? Either way, he hit himself. Is this the one he just got right back up after the with nope They're not gonna show it.   What are you all LeBron? Oh, no, this is a market smart market smart gas You know, he got the flop in him, too He didn't get touched he didn't get touched But the game is moving so fast that the refs can't help but to call that if you follow that way Thanks, Steph I mean, come on Chris Paul. You got to finish that No, that's not a flop because five just cross that man's up Al Horford No, good, but Marcus smart Let's look at the flop.   I miss land Stevenson, man We need a land Stevenson like character in the NBA at all times. I'll go past it to Jay Crowder What is that? What is that Marcus? Oh? AK-47 barely touch and you would have swung he got shot to J. R. Smith Oh, no, it's another LeBron and this is game seven of the first round of the playoffs this indie team and they were tough LeBron hit his handful Dirk being guarded by AK-47 Whoa, and you know what I'm surprised it hasn't been on here yet. My new my new head my new was a flopper early in his career My new was a flopper early in his career. I'm surprised. We haven't seen a single Manu's an overly clip just too much LeBron Look at this V. Oh This is really just a LeBron James compilation at this point. It's all LeBron my barn snow good Oh, yeah, Chris Paul's wow for this one I think there's a whole video on SB Nation about the beef between Chris Paul and the Marcus Cousins I would recommend that video Said is Lance to make him dance never mind. It's another another LeBron clip another LeBron and another LeBron clip. Oh Nazi push them Nazi go play it with Nazi That's why we need him back in the Chicago Bulls front office because if he's willing to do this to LeBron There's no things he wouldn't do for the win forever Bulls legend retire 48 retire 48. Oh It's another LeBron it is another LeBron Didn't even touch him When we make this compilation knew what they was doing. I put in all this LeBron in there They knew what they was doing. Oh, if you enjoyed the video be sure to leave it like this man candy. I'll be back. Peace