Last week in the victory over the Cincinnati Bengals, the Ravens secondary got to feast notching five sacks. It almost felt like a madden game when you look at the box score and you see the secondary like cornerbacks and safeties they got five sacks. But in this game against Philly, they should actually be able to feast in a different way. And hopefully at the end of the game they'll have the entire Ravens vlog saying, Fly Ravens Fly. YouTube team keeping clean, what's going on, it's Aangraven here with another video and in this video we're here to talk about the game that the Ravens have coming up against the Philadelphia Eagles. The Ravens currently sitting at 4-1, the Eagles sitting at 1-3-1 and they just came off a loss last week against the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Ravens of course are coming off a win against the other AFC North opponent in the Cincinnati Bengals. Both of these two teams are headed in completely opposite directions this season, the Eagles have just, it's been a bad season for them. Carson Wentz is leading the league in interceptions and he has had a banged up roster period. I'm not sure what the status of DeSean Jackson and Alshon Jeffery are headed into this game but they still have Fulcombe who I've been hearing a lot of stuff about and I really like, somebody who I really like on the Eagles is number 84, I think it's Greg Ward Jr. Because he, I don't know if you all see it, every time I watch the Eagles play and I see him make a catch, I see him run his routes, he always reminds me of Antonio Brown and of course him having that 84 on it doesn't make it any better. He always reminds me of Antonio every single time man and even the way that he got the gloves, he got the elbow, he just looks like Antonio Brown man, he looks like him. But Ravens are still going to have their hands full no matter who plays and who doesn't play. So we'll see what happens with that. But anyway, just to jump straight into it, Carson Wentz, like we talked about, he is leading the league in interceptions so Ravens need to up those numbers, they need to up his interception numbers and force him into making some bad reads, force him into making some bad turnovers and just make him have one of the worst games that he has ever had. Ravens need to get after him, hopefully in this game the pass rush will be up. I'm not sure the status of Eagles offensive line because I'm, Eagles are a team that I'm not too familiar with this season because I haven't got to watch too much of them. I have seen them in bits and pieces but I haven't got to watch them too often. So if, I mean, whether the Eagles offensive line is good or bad, they need to get after Carson Wentz because again, with any quarterback, whether they have the best weapons or not, you need to get after them because if you don't get after them, that builds their confidence because that means their offensive line is protecting them well. That means they have time to go through their reads, look all over the field, go through their first read, second read, third read. You know what? Let me go back to my first read. You know what? Let me go. They have that option. You don't want to give them that option. You don't. So make Carson Wentz uncomfortable. I believe they're running back is, I want to say Miles Sanders, but I feel like I'm incorrect on his name. But I think it's Miles. Either way, stop the running game. Don't let Eagles start running. Ravens have been doing an excellent job of doing that this season. Their run defense has been pretty good. And last week against Joe Mixon, they, boy, they were great. They were great. He could barely break for anything. He didn't have any good looks. They were hardly any holds. They took care of business. And that has been one thing about their defensive line this season that has been an A plus and a plus has been, well, actually a minus, but overall it's been pretty good. But it has been their run defense. So now in this game, let's take last week and what we were able to do last week, even though it was the cornerbacks, it was the secondary that led and sex instead of like linebackers and defensive ends and stuff, but we'll take it. But let's up that pass rush now. Let's open. Last week was a nice confidence booster. Let's carry that confidence into this game and go get after it. So defense, they going to have to force turnovers in this game and just keep on doing what they've been doing. Overall, the defense, they have the number one point. They have the number one scoring defense. The Ravens do right now because the Browns, they help that out because the Browns, they took care of business against the Colts and they, the Colts, whether they give up 32 points to the Browns or something like that. And that bumped them out of number one. So now the Ravens technically have the number one scoring defense. Do they have the number one defense? No, they don't, but scoring defense, that's the biggest thing that matters. The most is that you give up the least amount of points because you could, if you could give up 500 yards to somebody, 600, 700 yards in one game, but they only get six points, then it doesn't matter. That's the only thing that matters is the score. So I'll take the Ravens having the number one scoring defense over really anything because that means that they are holding it down. They may be bending a lot, but they aren't breaking. So we'll take it. I am not sure, like I said, I'm not sure the status of the Sean Jackson in this game or Al Sean, Jeffrey, but the Eagles, whatever they have, left their receiver, like I said, Fulham and Greg Ward, they are still going to bring it. So Marlon Humphrey, Marcus Peters, they still Jimmy Smith. Everybody's still going to have to be on the A game, expect Marlon Humphrey. You know, whenever the ball gets thrown to the receiver, he's covering. I saw somebody make a comment like, man, I wonder if should I feel should I feel bad about Marlon Humphrey breaking up a pass? Because maybe maybe I would rather him let the receiver catch it so he can wrap him up and do the fruit punch to him. So I mean, that's that's where Marlon Humphrey is at at this point in his career. That dude, he always trying to knock that ball out. So then Philly receivers, hey, they better get some stick them. They better get some gorilla glue. They better get some duct tape for when they catch that ball because Marlon Humphrey will be trying. You already know. Patrick Queen, I expect him to be super active this game like he has been literally every Ravens game. The dude is all over the field. The dude is that speed is crazy. I expect them to send him to try to go get Carson Wentz. I do expect them to mix it up. I know with one thing with Wink that again, a lot of people have been frustrated with, but see, you didn't hear much frustrating and frustration about it last week. When they were sending this guy, they were sending to Sean Elliott. They were sending Humphrey. They were sending markets. They sent everybody blitzing.  You hear that because it was getting home and see when it gets home, that's when people feel different about it. But the thing again, the thing that people get frustrated with Wink about is the adjustments. Because like when against Patrick Mahomes, it was not getting home and they still kept doing it over and over and over and over and it wasn't working over and over and over and over and they weren't getting home, but Patrick Mahomes was eating it up. So one thing that with the defense, what they need to do in this game, make your adjustments, make your adjustments. So they did a good job last week. I feel like they didn't even have to make any adjustments because they were pretty much on it the entire game. But in this week, if you see that Carson Wentz and those Eagles are successful at doing something, make those adjustments. Make sure everybody is accounted for. Zach, please watch out for Zach Erz this game because, again, you know, Ravens, they they struggle, they can struggle with tight ends sometimes, man.  I'm not frustrated with the contract. And he thought, oh, I'm back. I'm back. Let's get it. We don't want this to be that game. It doesn't need to be a game. Don't do it. Zach Erz, please, no. But anyway, let's flip it to special teams. Justin Tucker, continue to do your thing. Sam Cook, hopefully we won't even have to punt till later on in the game. Hopefully we won't have to punt at all. That'd be nice. But Justin Tucker, Sam Cook, the norm, the regular. Pro Shae continue to be safe. I don't expect I don't expect any big point returns from Pro Shae.  But he has safe hands. So continue to feel the punt swell. He's been doing a good job of that. They've been somewhere I've questioned it. We're like, man, why did he let that bounce? So why didn't he try to return this? But he's been doing a fine job. Devin DuVernay on kick return. I would love to see somebody else on kick return. So Devin DuVernay can be put on offense a little more. They can be he can be used on offense a little more. Or if he just does both. But that makes us that's a nice little segue for us to get to the offense now. Because we just did put out the questions from subscriber video earlier today, where they had some very, very, very, very great questions. And they're like, y'all always do team keep it clean. So shout out to y'all. But one of the questions was with the offense because there have been so many questions and concerns and worries about the offense. Why the Ravens doing this? What are they doing? And it's been around the passing game and lack of the running game. One of the questions was maybe people think some people think that Lamar could be injured. And that's why they've limited his running and they've upped his passing. Some other people think that, hey, maybe the Ravens are just trying to get him more comfortable making a lot more passes per game just to prepare him just for the future period. Just for the future. Not only just the playoffs, but just for the future to where he can have everything down pack passing outside the numbers inside the numbers, passing downfield, the dump offs, whatever. The check downs. So, and then other people think that, well, maybe the Ravens are just passing, passing, passing right now and they're experimenting with some of these bad teams. So whatever it is, hey, Ravens are currently four and one. And hopefully after this weekend, they can get to five and one because they are going against a bad team. But again, it is any given Sunday. So you cannot take the Eagles lightly at all. At all. They can't take anybody lightly because again, this is, it's every game is a big game because every game is where you get one step closer to where you need to be. So they need to be on point against these Eagles. Now my hope would be that, hey, the run game does get established. They can really have a lead back to have somebody that gets the majority of the carries and they don't just try to make everybody happy by feeding everybody, but hey, we'll see. I know at this point, a lot of us, especially myself, probably sound like a broken record saying that, but it's just, it's just how we feel. It's just how we feel and what we feel would be best for Ravens business. But hey, what do we know? Because they are four and one. And even though they haven't really had a lead back, they've still been finding ways to win. So that's the most important thing is that the team does find ways to win. Hopefully in this game, Lamar Jackson, since I expect them to continue having him pass the ball more, hopefully it can be more than just Hollywood and Mark Andrews. Hopefully we can get somebody else. Whether it's Devin Duvenay, whether it's Willie Snead, whether it's Miles Boykin, whether it's Pro Shae. I don't think it's likely that it's Pro Shae. And I kind of don't even think it's likely that it's Duvenay. I hope it is though. But just based off of how things have been, my expectations are a little bit low right now as far as them really implementing him in the game. Now some of that is on Lamar as well because Duvenay did have an opportunity to possibly score a touchdown last week. So what Lamar Jackson really needs to work on doing is trying to establish trust with the other receivers. I know it can be hard if somebody breaks your trust and just in life period, it can be extremely hard to gain that trust back. It is far easier to lose trust than to gain it. So in Lamar Jackson's situation, I think he's lost trust with Miles Boykin. And with Willie Snead, I'm not sure what the deal is right there. But with Miles Boykin, I feel like he's lost it. So it's gonna take a lot. It's gonna take a lot in practice and it's gonna take a lot in games for him to gain that trust with Miles Boykin back. So whoever else they have out there on the field, besides Hollywood, besides Mark Andrews, then hopefully Lamar can start looking those guys' ways and they can make some plays together. Because what we as Ravens fans are just hoping for is to have a more complete offense, a more fulfilled offense to where it's not just 15 and 89 like Jesse Bates from the Bingo said last week. Because we as fans, we all know that already and teams, they all know that already. They know where Lamar got his eyes locked on, but he gotta unlock that and look at other guys too. So this game is big for the offensive line. Hopefully Tyree Phillips can return to practice tomorrow and he can be good to go or else they may just be experimenting again between Ben Powers, Makari, or DJ Flucca. So, excuse me, we'll see how that goes. But this game is gonna have its challenges. It's certainly gonna have its challenges. Lamar definitely needs to be more careful with the ball and get a bit better at decision making. Last week wasn't his best game, but again, like I said, last week gave him a pass. He had a lot that he was going through with his close friend being killed. So that's unfortunate and like I said, with these football players, with these athletes and whatnot, they, their jobs are a lot different than the norm. And with their jobs being put on public display, it's just, it's really, really, really tough, especially when they go through stuff. And like I said, everybody handles when they go through stuff differently. Everybody is not the same person. Everybody doesn't have the same mindset and whatnot.  So this will be a nice game for Hollywood to get another touchdown. Mark Andrews and Matt Mark Andrews to sort of have his internal battle with Zach, or it should be like, oh, I'm better than you. And Zach could probably try to be like, no, I'm better than you. Hopefully Zach doesn't show off anything like that, but hopefully Mark Andrews can really start to establish himself as one of the better Titans in the league and really just show us consistency, consistency. But the big thing with Mark Andrews is like against bad teams, we've seen the consistency so we just want to see it against the better teams. So this game will be just a nice game to just continue what you've been doing, continue scoring, continue making some plays. So play calling in this game, again, Greg Roman, we'll see how it goes. I continue to expect a lot of passing now. It has become the norm for this Raven's offense. But maybe since now, since we expect so much passing, maybe now they'll just catch us off guard and really run that ball. So we'll see how it goes though. But I do expect the Ravens to come out on top in this game. I would say the score that I expect would be 35 to 17 in this game. I believe Philly's games, most of their games have been close. They, of course, they also had to tie. Let's see. So they lost to the Washington football team by 10 to no blowouts there. They lost to the LA Rams 37-19. So that was a big yikes, that was a blowout. And then of course they tied with the Bengals. They beat the 49ers by five. And they lost to the Steelers by nine. So their games have been sort of fluctuating. But whenever they lost, they lost by at least two scores. But that doesn't even mean anything. I expect, like I said, 35, 17 Ravens. I expect them to take care of business in a major way in this game and just keep it moving. So I know Eagles, they're going to put up a fight. They're definitely going to put up a fight. But I don't think they're going to be able to put up a fight for that much, though that long, really. So we'll see how everything turns out. So team, keep it clean. I appreciate y'all. I love y'all. And remember, fly Ravens, fly. We out.


The study found no significant difference in shear bond strength between monocrystalline and polycrystalline ceramic brackets when bonded to unruffened or roughened resin composite discs, but a higher frequency of resin composite fracture was observed with the polycrystalline brackets. It is concluded that debonding any type of ceramic bracket from a resin composite surface may cause damage to the resin composite itself. This article was authored by Chenna Chivichilok and Tiaz Martin J.


So our organization, Thaumata Leisure Experiences, is based on the idea of responsible hospitality. And that essentially encompasses a lot of different aspects of sustainability. It encompasses the idea of environmental sustainability. How can we as an organization, as hoteliers, as people who run these hotels and resorts, be more responsible towards our environment by reducing our footprint, whether it's the waste that we create, whether it's in being more reasonable in our consumption patterns. It's also around the idea of having good people practices. So how do we create fulfilling employment, fair employment for people from all aspects of the socioeconomic spectrum. And then of course, how do we create a business which is finally providing excellent guest experiences where they are engaging with a destination in a truly authentic way. So really in our business what we say is that you can't take one property and put it somewhere else because that property really belongs to that place and that really is to the core of sustainability. We want our hotels to be places which are resilient, which are authentic and which can sustain no matter what hits them. I think consumers are far more aware and interested in the concept of responsibility and sustainability than they were pre-pandemic. We've all become aware of environmental changes which are happening, the impact of for instance the clash between wildlife and humans and how that's led to really these enormous calamities over the last couple of years. And so people have become far more invested in finding businesses that are responsible, much more so than before the pandemic. So you see that people are doing more research. You see that people are making decisions based on this idea of is this organization treating its people right? Do they have good practices when it comes to their supply chain?  This is, you know, I think this was there to a small extent before, but it's far more, it's a far greater population who is now invested in these ideas than before. I think from our perspective we've started to communicate that more actively, right? So, you know, we've always been an organization that's invested in responsible hospitality but it is important that we continuously engage with that idea that we put it out there, that we get more collaborators on board. We really want more hotels to be responsible. Finally, that's also one of the goals that we have for ourselves is that we want to share our best practices with the industry so that we as an industry can evolve to be better and to have much more positive impact on the communities in which we exist. Today we operate six properties in South India and we own four properties in Germany. So currently we have four more properties which are in the pipeline which are getting constructed. I have a few more which are in approval phases we're just waiting on, you know, to get going on the construction. And then further on we're looking at expansion really in several destinations across the length and breadth of India, also in a couple of places abroad. And those are in various stages of that process of acquisition at this point.


Okay, so I work on the ClinSeq project here at the NIH, and I'm going to present a little bit of data that we're just starting to collect on qualitative interviews we did with participants, some of our first participants who've gotten results back through our project. So I thought I would start with just a little bit of background literature. So obviously, as the number of people having sequencing grows, there's so much debate going on about whether and how to return results, how these results are going to impact people both in terms of sort of emotional or psychological reactions, and in terms of medical care, whether these are actually going to be used as you've already sort of heard about today. And so some of the arguments that have been pointed out in favor of returning more results are that, you know, maybe we need to be sharing these results out of respect for participants, or we should share them to maximize benefits if we can show that the risks of sharing these results are low, that it would make sense to share more. On the other hand, a lot of people talk about not sharing results in order to sort of minimize harms until we know exactly what's going on, or to avoid minimizing burden on the medical system, so not overwhelming people with lots of follow-up testing that they would need to have done based on genetic susceptibility. And so several studies have started to look at both the general population and participants in research studies and sort of their preferences around getting results back. And I think generally what we've seen is that people are wildly enthusiastic about getting their results back, and then when probed in more detail, tend to discriminate a little bit more between different result types, and so they tend to want, similar to what Daniel and Julie were reporting on, tend to be most favorable about actionable results and carrier results, and then their attitudes, if they're going to have a negative attitude, it tends to be around those non-preventable things. There's also been a lot of studies done about motivations for wanting results, and similar to what was already presented today, I think there's these ideas about having enough as much information as possible, both in terms of implementing screening and following medical recommendations, but also just in terms of sort of being vigilant yourself or curating information on your own, rather than relying on somebody else. Also making diet and lifestyle changes, personal planning decisions like purchasing insurance, but also just this general belief in the value of information, even when it's uninterpretable. People really just value the information and would like to have it in their own hands. The other thing that's come up quite often in the debate about what to return and what's valuable is the difference of clinical utility and personal utility, and so clinical utility is exactly what you think it is. It's changing somebody's clinical care, it's something that medically, we would say, would be actionable, and it's often been used as the standard for thinking through return of results that something as clinical utility, it seems pretty clear cut that we should share it with people. Even though it's unclear to what degree any of these results actually impact an individual's clinical care. There's also this concept of personal utility, so value people may gain from results because of their impact on how they perceive themselves, their relationships, other factors, and it's been sort of an amorphous concept, this idea that probably people have some personal value of these results, but it hasn't really been articulated what that might be and then how much weight that would deserve in deciding what to return to people. And so we wanted to do a project where we were going to look at a couple of the issues that this background literature brings up, so one is just describing the experience of participants in our project who have received individual genetic testing results back so far. And so we wanted to, I think the first aim is really sort of a practical or boring aim of like how did you like the process, how did you like the experience, what worked and what didn't work. The second part was looking at the psychological and emotional impact of these results as well as the impact on things like communication with health care providers and family members. And then lastly exploring this concept of personal utility with participants and seeing how they're really valuing this beyond some of the things that we might imagine as health care providers. So we did this within the ClinSeq population and I'm just going to do a quick description for those of you who don't know about it. ClinSeq is a study of over a thousand people in the D.C. area who've all elected to come in and have pretty broad consent for either exome or whole genome sequencing. Most of our study participants are healthy. We do recruit about a quarter of them to have heart disease. It was initially sort of focused on heart disease and has moved away from that now and is more presented as a broad based genetic test to look for genetic susceptibility. Our participants are 45 to 65 years old when they consent and we know from previous surveys that they are highly educated, mostly Caucasian. We have a good breakdown of males and females and they've been consented since 2007 so one of the things I get called about all the time is all the people who've been in the study for seven years and have gotten no results back yet. So lots of these people wait a long time before they actually get these results back. Our return of result process is something that's always in flux but what we've been doing most recently is when we find a variant I call the participant and I tell them that we have something for them but I don't tell them what it is. I don't usually tell them what category it fits into. I just say we have a result. Talk to me about what your preferences are, what you want to know, what you don't want to know and if we have something that falls into a category that you want to know about then we'll validate it and return to you. The exception are the variants on the ACMG list which we consider of such importance that we return them whether or not participants want them. Then people if they want the result they come in, they have an in-person disclosure session with a geneticist and a genetic counselor and they get a follow-up report from us and generally a phone check-in from me and counseling over the phone if they would like it. So for this qualitative interview project we recruited people who were enrolled in ClinSeq and had gotten back one genetic testing result so far who'd not been in previous social behavioral studies and were willing to complete a 30-minute phone interview. And so we had about 50 or 60 people who were eligible and they were all contacted several times via phone and written letter to participate in the study. We ended up having about half of the participants about 31 complete interviews, 29 of the interviews were recorded transcribed and coded and just to give you a sense of the types of results people got back so many of them were sort of off that ACMG list and considered to be highly actionable so hereditary cancer, cardiomyopathy, hypercholesterolemia, but also lots of people who had sort of more mild results so spherocytosis, protein S deficiency and things like that and these results were returned over about a six-month period to the participants. So the experience receiving results, most participants were really satisfied with the process they really felt like yes there were some nagging negative parts of the process for me but generally it was more positive than negative and that sort of outweighed in the experience for them. The negative parts for most people were either the waiting from the time when I call them to when they get to come in which makes sense or feeling like the session sort of overemphasized the results either by making them come in in person they felt like that put too much emphasis on the result or by offering counseling they felt like that often ever emphasized the results which is always tricky for me because I think I just struggle with feeling like somebody who gets for example this guy a BRCA result back have in my mind that that's going to be a pretty impactful result and a lot of people are pretty underwhelmed and feel like offering the counseling and going through that is putting too much emphasis on what this result will mean for them. In terms of emotional impact of these results the most common responses are that these results satisfy my curiosity they're intellectually exciting I find them fascinating I loved talking about them with the researchers they really almost react more like peers or more like scientists getting these results back than somebody who's getting a personal result they it's almost like they have a degree of objectivity about it and they're a little bit distanced from the results when they talk about them. In terms of emotional reaction they're pretty neutral I mean most people sort of say what this female participant said which is you know I was a little surprised or concerned at first but then as I started to think about it I really have a lot of other health concerns that are more pressing to me than this you know regardless of whether their results were about cancer risk or cardiac arrhythmia they're sort of dealing more in the here and now with things that are impacting their health today. About half of our participants got results that were expected based on their personal and family history so they had a family history of the condition whatever it was they generally would say that they found those results helpful but I think sometimes surprising so they hadn't well they knew they had a family history of this they hadn't necessarily put together maybe that there was a genetic risk and they certainly hadn't put together that they were at that risk necessarily so I think you know we hear a lot of people talking like this that maybe getting this information is confirmation that yes I'm at risk to be affected by this thing that I know is running in my family so not totally new information but a new way of thinking about it perhaps. In terms of communicating the results generally people are sharing these results with their families and their health care providers almost everybody reported that they were sharing at least somewhat and we're seeing that that's having some perceived impact on their health care health behaviors so like people going and getting breast exams or people getting medical alert bracelets things like that. The greatest impact though I think that people are reporting on is really this sense of vigilance or self-monitoring that people are really taking this into their own hands and saying well I'm being much more aware now or I'm really following the literature about this now I'm really watching for symptoms and signs of this condition as opposed to my doctor recommended that I have particular screening or testing done. And then we also asked about future results so pretty much everybody still wants to know everything and this guy with the APOB result is pretty pretty typical give me everything you know. There is some discrimination that people make between different result types but this typically requires prompting so typically when we ask the broad question what do you want to know they say everything and then if the person conducting the interview will say what about something that's not preventable what about something that you know has a low chance of actually affecting you then some people do start to back off of that assertion and say well yeah maybe not that but typically it does really require that prompting before you get people saying these sorts of things where they're actually holding back and saying you know the issue is that you know whether people or I want to have the information about things that I can't control and I still struggle with that. There was also some people who wanted our result return process to change so this is pretty typical of our participants that they would really like their results in a file or sent to them via email they would like to have access to everything that we could provide them. So you know our conclusions were still really reacting to this data since it's really newly analyzed but I think a lot of what we feel like we're seeing is that generally participants are reacting pretty well to this disclosure process most people were not distressed we think we had maybe one or two out of the 30 who were distressed so those negative emotional impacts have been really minimal and this probably has a lot to do with our population so we know ClinSeq participants are really optimistic people. I think also their age plays into this so they are you know now they're in their 50s their 60s their 70s and so a lot of them are saying well you know I didn't get cancer yet I mean I'm feeling like maybe I'm out living some of my risk I mean in some cases we would agree with that and then I think there's also this what we're calling the cool factor of these results that people kind of just think it's cool they I don't know that they think about them as pertaining to their personal health as much as they just think it's interesting academically to have this information and we sort of see that with them then maybe not changing a whole lot necessarily about their health they're kind of engaging with the information on a different way I think we also see that the attitudes they have about their results are pretty newly formed and fluid so when they're they're prompted to think more about result types they may want people do tend to change their mind I shouldn't say tend that's the point at which people would change their minds I don't think a lot of people come to the table with well enough formed ideas to articulate preferences about different types of results and then last on this idea of personal utility what we really got from people was that it's derived from this knowledge of your results so knowing something more about yourself understanding something that you didn't understand before and being able to use that information however you see fit so sort of personal advocacy for your health vigilance around surveillance things like that so a big thanks to everybody who's been working on this project and of course our participants as well that's great Katie thank you so one thing I was thinking about during your presentation is just how our paradigm for thinking about predictive genetic information really started with Huntington's disease and hereditary cancer and how that shaped a lot of how the culture in our field and how we all think about these things and then we're starting to get the initial data from folks from like this and it's in such stark contrast right so I wonder what thoughts you have about your data and how that might kind of teach us about our own selves and where we're coming from with that prior paradigm and to what extent it's at all valid in this setting yeah absolutely I think I think about that a lot and it's definitely something that I'm struggling with daily in clinic and I think a lot of people will because you're right our paradigms have just been shaped around people who are coming with a specific question in mind with this maybe legacy of disease or diagnostic Odyssey more like what Julie was talking about and so I think it is going to be a different model of counseling to some extent but I will say it's not dissimilar from other things we do right so I was talking with one of the people who did the interviews on this project and he works in a cancer clinic and he said you know we return BRCA results sometimes though to asymptomatic 70 year old women who are doing this testing for other people in their families and so I think there are instances in which we're having the same sorts of conversations I think it was just originally that we didn't realize that's how it was going to be for these participants we were sort of lumping it together with like the Huntington's disease and these other sorts of unexpected results instead of lumping it together with these you know like I say the older woman who's coming in and getting BRCA testing for other family members but maybe not for personal risk I think it's I think it's partly a question of motivations and if we can find cases where people were coming to genetics clinics for similar reasons that they're seeking out exome sequencing it might help us have a better frame of reference to start from. Does that make sense?


In a statement to the New York Times, Carlson said, quote, it is horrifying what happened to Navalny. The whole thing is barbaric and awful. No decent person would defend it. You didn't talk about freedom of speech in Russia. You did not talk about Navalny, about assassinations. I have spent my life talking to people who run countries in various countries and have concluded the following, that every leader kills people, including my leader. Putin's a killer. A lot of killers. You get a lot of killers. Why do you think our country is so innocent? This is who you want to hand the country to. These are the people who should govern. These are the people who should set the course for the country. God help us.


My grandparents started this operation about 1923. My dad was born and raised, lived his whole life on this operation, and same thing with me, I've been here my whole life. In our operation, we work together as a family unit. My wife's involved, my son's involved in it. We move cows together, we work together, he's able to go out and see nature and the creation, everything that works together as it was meant to. One of the things that's been really fun for me is when we move the cattle, we're actually moving them in areas that still have grass, so that you don't feel like you're abusing the land, but you're actually using the land, not only to make a living, but to keep it healthy, that you're a steward of the land, not just of the animal. We live in what would be considered pothole country. We have quite a bit of native grass here yet. This operation has a little over 2,000 acres of native grassland yet. Same as when the Indians roam the plains. We have T.P. Rings Indian Graves. There's on this operation about 500 acres that has actually been broke, but the rest is native grass. We enjoy seeing the grasslands, enjoy seeing the wildlife on it. The whole environment benefits from the grasslands. It is a little bit rougher ground, makes it a little difficult to farm. Some people would farm it, but we don't due to the importance of the grass. My dad always said the cows are what bought most everything on the farm, not the farming. We are not wanting to have all the money that we could possibly be gaining and may be gaining if we broke up this land. Splitting the land up, allowing that grass to grow, to regenerate has benefited us and that we can leave it as it is and still make a living off of it. And we're proud of that. Back in 2006, we had a severe drought and I had just prior to that, I was able to enroll in an equip program sponsored by NRCS and I was approved for it. So we put in that year, we put in 25,000 feet of water line. In stages, he kind of added pipeline, added tanks, and just put them right in his cross fences and you really see the even distribution of the grazing and the pastures because of that. When we started the rotation, we did about two to three weeks per paddock and then we'd move them on to the next one. From seeing the benefits of that and rotating the cows through and how the grass could recover because they're having to eat species that if they were just allowed to roam the whole pasture, they'd just pick out their choice plants. So some areas get more overgrazed than others. By forcing them to go through the different paddock, splitting those pastures up, they have had to eat more of the grass and then there's a longer recovery time for the ones that they really hit hard. With Roarbox operation, they have really reduced their dependency on hay to where they're brought in, some of their hayland into the rotation. And one thing I think they see that they're doing there is a lot of nutrient cycling. When they harvest their hay and they bring it into the home place, the cattle eat it there, they drop their manure there and then they got to haul it back out. And in their operation, the cattle eat there and they leave their manure there and that's reduced some of their inputs on that front. This year, even with their drought, I was able to leave some rest and you can really see the big blue stem, a lot of the forbs that have started to be coming through, so there's a big variety of plants and vegetation for the livestock to choose from. I have seen an economic impact with the rotation to be able to up my herd, be able to sell more pounds of beef off the land. One of the hardest things for I think for most producers is the fact that when you go out into the pasture and you see the grass that has grown already and you think, well, these cows can still stay here. There's still something to eat. If you leave that leaf structure there, it's in a way it's like its mouth for the roots. You got to leave that leaf surface area there for it to take in the sun to build those energy reserves for next year and to build that root growth. You're not losing what's there. It's benefiting the biology and the plant to regrowth and give you more when it comes back. Being able to keep that shade on the soil to cut down on the evaporation of what moisture you do have to work with. That first fence is always the toughest to put up. You never had that fence there before. It's a change. Change can be hard, but that first fence is the toughest. And once a producer gets that first fence in, it only takes one to notice a little bit of a difference. And that's the gateway fence to lead in to more fence and to go that next step. Whether it's our own land or the land that's around us or the water that we drink in 100 years or our kids drink in 100 years, we value that. We're trying to take care of it in a way that it still produces, but it produces in a way that is showing it the honor that it deserves.


What is going on happy Monday live from Titans training camp say Thomas sportspark? It's a different week because it's actual game week preseason though. It may be we're excited about it. Good day at work We've been to do it today Let's go today better than yesterday. We'll get to these team periods. I want to get after all right. Let's go Bring your hands there we go there you go John All hands go dry dry dry dry feet off the break Kick returner Chester Rogers spent last season on the team's practice squad This summer he's working hard to make the final roster and he's hoping his versatility on both offense and special teams Will work in his favor That's super super major. I can return kick returns from returns play inside outside So just being able to do anything they asked is pretty major for me. Obviously, it's a big opportunity ahead I think I position myself in a you know a good spot And I just had to go out there and show it in the game and show you know why I'm six years in the league So I just got to continue to show it Hey you go. Good job, baby Good job. Here we go. Roby you're up, but here we go over here I want to get into a conversation about these edge rushers. You have Bud Dupree You have Harold Landry you know these names you know They're gonna play a great a substantial amount of snaps for you But it gets a lot more interesting behind those top two guys where you have John Simon a veteran of eight years Who's come in and tried to hold the position down? It is something that with Derek Roverson Wyatt Ray Trying to figure out how all these pieces work for shot weaver the rookie If you look in the room, we got a lot of dogs a lot of vets too So I mean it's competition every day So usually I come out here and compete if you don't compete well You're gonna be left at the bottom so So you've got a couple weeks man I want all of you here, but understand I get the competition some of you guys are improving like Roby you're improving Weaver from the time you step foot on here and rookie make your improving You know weaver I would love to watch weaver, you know, I mean he's had a good couple days He's been active. I don't know we'll see but a week ago. I don't know if I was really excited to watch and play But I am now We're gonna put the best people on the field. They're gonna help us win games All right, and we have now until cut date to get that done and that goes for everybody here in this room So keep riding improving. Let's rock and roll John get us out of here. LB's on three one two three LB jog it off The preseason here in Atlanta underweight Woodside back to throw has time over the middle pass complete to Chester Rogers Rogers has had some very impressive days during camp Catch it at the 30 beats one man 35 40 45 50 45 40 to the outside 35 30 25 20 15 and he is run out of bounds. Yes, excellent return Chester Rogers The kick Tennessee three Atlanta nothing 107 to go first quarter second down in long McCarron under pressure again Weaver has time throws down the middle intercepted Intercepted by long Woodside from the gun back shoulder throw left side ball caught touchdown Titans Cameron After the David Long Interception the Titans cash in and they leave the Falcons 10 to nothing with 10 49 to go in the first half goes Again, this Tennessee defense making some noise. I think the storyline early on if you're a Titans fan You love to see the pressure of the Titans have gotten first and there's weaver. Oh, oh my goodness Weaver with the smack.


Meet the Mercado family. They have served in the United States Navy for three generations. In the beginning, everybody was enlisted as a steward's man and everybody wanted to change rate, but I had the good opportunity to change right away after bootcamp. Well, I think his generation, you know, my father's generation kind of paved the way for the rest of us. You know, I feel I didn't see any discrimination. It was, you were advanced and you did well based on how hard you worked. And that is probably a large part due to those men back then who enlisted and joined the Navy to serve and had to put up probably with a lot more than I had to. Yeah, my grandfather loves the Navy. He is about the Navy, so him telling stories about when he was back in the Navy back in the day, you know, I get to see I get to work with Master Chiefs and kind of see what his role was. So it's very neat to be able to see that. After a 24 year long career Master Chiefs Storekeeper Victorino Mercado retired and his son carried on his legacy by joining the Academy. Well, I was really proud and as a matter of fact there were times, you know, while he was in high school we helped fill up his application, but I never twisted his arm. As you get older and you think of the possibility, you look up and say, hey, I could one day be a CEO of a ship. That'd be kind of nice, you know. I could be there and I could be leading 300 and some sailors, you know, on a destroyer. That'd be pretty good. You take it one step at a time.  And then when you're given that opportunity, you say, wow, isn't this great? I think there's a natural tendency to look up and say, God, I'd like to be able to be like dad. But then there's pressure there, you know, with my son and what he wanted to do. And so trying to give him that space to decide what he wants to do. And I didn't think he would want to push on and join the Navy. But he came in and said, well, maybe he will go to the Naval Academy and now he's deployed and flying missions in the Arabian Gulf. So it's a pretty proud moment. I felt pretty comfortable joining the Navy and I had any questions that they'd be able to answer them and give me their advice on their experiences in the past. I joined the Navy because I wanted to be a part of Naval aviation. I've always wanted to be a part of the big Navy team. Whether serving as a Master Chief Storekeeper, a Strike Group Commander or a Naval Aviator, the Mercados continue their legacy of success in the United States Navy, one generation at a time. From here on in, God knows only what will happen.