distinguished heads of state and government, honorable ministers and Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. I'm extremely honored to join you in this session an important emergency summit. Middle East is a significant geographical region that requires international communities collective responsibility and comprehensive action. Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is the one of the risks that to our contemporary world and we cannot overcome this menace unless all member states including nuclear ones adopt a just principle approach in their respective policies. In this context I would like to revise and regard the challenging security situation in the Middle East with particular emphasis on the nuclear program and also the concerns of regional countries about a possible course of action that might be taken against. Establishing a credible and convincing global nonproliferation regime would not be achievable while ignoring the facto existence of nuclear weapons of certain countries at the heart of the most critical and tender region. Global problems cannot be solved unilaterally, bilaterally or small like-minded nations in the circle. Therefore it's important today that we need to adopt a multilateral approach to this emergency session. Now I want to get the views from the delegates of each countries according to the order that I will declare. However each state has a four at most five minutes due to the time construction. Okay I will leave the ground first of all to USA and secondly Israel, thirdly Iran as fourth Iraq and the fifth one is Turkey and the sixth one is Syria, then Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Europe Union, Russian Federation and lastly to Jordan. Thank you. Thank you for your speech honorable delegate, honorable secretary general and honorable delegates. We meet today at a moment of great consequence in the long and complicated history of international concerns about Iran and its nuclear ambitions. Today as honorable secretary general have just indicated we have an urgent problem regarding Iran's nuclear program. This issue is not just a problem to solve but is a danger for all of us for our world and for our future as well. We have taken some sanctions towards Iran. It's a set of measures that we are determined to implement fully and aggressively. It's a set of measures that is already producing tangible results and it's a set of measures that reinforces our collective resolve to hold Iran to its international obligations. A great deal is a state a nuclear armed Iran would severely threaten the security and stability of a part of the world crucial to our interests and to the health of the global economy. It would seriously undermine the credibility of the United Nations and other international institutions and seriously weaken the nuclear nonproliferation regime at precise of the moment when we are seeking to strengthen it. In the face of those challenges American policy is straightforward. We must prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. We must counter its destabilizing actions in the region and beyond. We must continue to do all we can do to advance our broader interest in the democracy, human rights, peace and economic development across the Middle East. President Obama has made clearly repeated that we will stand up for those rights that should be universal to all human beings and stand with those brave Iranians who seek only to express themselves freely and peacefully. The simple truth is that a government that does not respect the rights of its own people will find it increasingly difficult to win the respect that it professes to seek in the international community. We have emphasized from the start that what is issue between Iran and the rest of the world is not its right to a peaceful nuclear program, but rather it's the case long failure to live up to the responsibilities that will come with that right. If Iran is sincere, it should not be hard to show the rest of the international community that its nuclear program is aimed at exclusively peaceful purposes. Thanks our standard things, however, and it's a telling fact that Iran, along all signatories of the NPT, continues to fail year after year to convince the IAEA and the United Nations of its peaceful nuclear intentions. Nearly two years ago, President Obama began an unprecedented effort at engagement with Iran. We did so without illusions about whom we were dealing with or the scope of our differences over the past 30 years. We sought to create early opportunities for Iran to pursue a different path and to build confidence in its intentions. This was both a serious demonstration of our good faith and also an investment in partnership with a growing coalition of countries profoundly concerned about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Let me conclude by emphasizing simple but important realities. Sanctions and pressures are not an end in themselves. They are a complement not a substitute for the diplomatic solution to which we and our partners are still firmly committed. There's still time for diplomacy if Iran is prepared to engage in serious discussions. There's still room for a renewed effort to break down mistrust and begin a careful faith process of building confidence between Iran and the international community. There's still an opportunity for an outcome which ensures both Iran's rights and the fulfillment of its responsibilities. To conclude, I appreciate the emphasize Obama's words for all of us to frame our international policy. Suppressing ideas never success in making them go away. This issue must be taken into account as a global issue rather than a basic regional problem concerning human rights. If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the rights and the view of its own people. It must govern through consent, not coercion. Thank you. Thank you, Chief. Okay, now it's your turn, Israel. Thank you, Mr. Secretary General, as you can see, the same wish delegates. Thanks to you, former president, Mr. Eisenhower's speech, Autism for Peace, the usage of atomic energy became the issue of the world politics. Although most of the countries prefer to use atomic energy for peaceful purposes, some of them choose the atomic energy for military purposes. Especially Iran's activity, cursing and nuclear weapons capability, as a part of a forced impulse, it is hegemony in the region and beyond. To supplement its activity in this context, Tehran employs subversion, support for terrorism, and dissemination of our policy, which talks to the rejects human rights and other freedoms. At the same time, Tehran's signing of many places, the automatic area, in order to further its strategic goal, especially Tehran's negative attitudes towards RIA and other countries who have concern about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Tehran's negative attitudes seem obviously in general conference, and Iranian government behave unwillingly to co-grade international community. The state of Israel has to characterize Iran's nuclear ambitions as an existential threat to our country. Extreme Islamist movements that heated by Tehran direct the states that they desire to destroy the state of Israel. However, it is not only our concern, it should be concerned by the international community as a whole. Following the various efforts, on 2010 June, international community finally secured the adoption of the new Secretary of State Council resolution, 1929. On behalf of my country, we appreciate that United Nations Security Council resolution 1929 represent a significant upgrade over previous resolution. It includes, for the first time, a reference to the energy sector, strong sanction against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, restriction on the banking ties with the Iran, strength sanction in transportation and shipping sector, the establishment of a panel of experts to the sanction committee, expansion of the arms embargo, and a nutritional restriction in the missile chauffeur. The IAA report in the September 2010 on the Iranian nuclear crisis highlights the absence of cooperation by Tehran with the agency. According to the report, Iran has adopted minimalistic approach in implementing its safeguard agreements with the IAA. It places optical and restriction in the way of routine inspection activity conducted by the agency. And completely refuses to cooperate with the IAA's investigation into nuclear program, military dimension and attitude which has effectively blocked progress since 2008. The rising international pressure has converged with the deepening domestic crisis in Iran, which is facing a worsening economic downturn particularly because of sanctions and declining oil revenues. It should be noted that West, led by the USA, has made it clear that sanctions are intended to break in Iran, back to the negotiation table, and have expressed willingness to resume talks. The State of Israel called all states urgently to extend the section on Iran and the international committee's highest priority must be to prevent this threat from material dying. Although these sanctions are applied on Iran, if Tehran continues nuclear ambitions, there should be more concrete steps in order to take actions. Thank you. In the name of God, of mercy, compassion, peace, freedom and justice. Honourable Secretary-General of the United Nations, distinguished heads of delegation, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I praise the merciful all-knowing and almighty God for blessing me with an opportunity to address this family on behalf of the great nation of Iran in order to clarify the approach and initiative of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the nuclear issue. Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most suitable alternatives to cut the pollution emanating from fossil fuels. The Non-Fluorification Treaty allows all member states to use nuclear energy without limits and the International Atomic Energy Agency is mandated to provide member states with technical and legal support. The nuclear bomb is the first inhumane weapon and which must be totally eliminated. The MPT prohibits its development and stop firing and calls for nuclear disarmament. Nonetheless, note what some of the permanent members of the Security Council and nuclear bomb holders have done. They have equated nuclear energy with the nuclear bomb and have distanced this energy from the reach of most of nations by establishing monopolies and pressuring the IAEA. While at the same time they have continued to maintain, expand and upgrade their own nuclear arsenals. This has entailed the following. Not only the nuclear disarmament has not been realized but also nuclear bombs have been proliferated in some regions including by the occupying and intimidating Zionist regime. I would like here to propose that the year 2011 be proclaimed the year of nuclear disarmament and nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none. However, nuclear weapons and their proliferation and attempts to impose an effort-side regime with access to peaceful nuclear energy are two major threats. Challenging international tranquility and peace. Allow me as the head of delegation of the Islamic Republic of Iran to outline the other main elements of my country's initiative regarding the nuclear issue. You are all aware that Iran is a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency and has always observed its rules and regulations and has had the most extensive cooperation with this agency in all areas. All our nuclear activities have been completely peaceful and transparent. Iran does not discuss its foregrounded nuclear energy nuclear rights in any way. The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its previously unrepeatedly declared positions that in accordance with our religious principles perceived of nuclear weapons is haram, prohibited. Iran welcomes dialogue with the West on equal basis and mutual respect. The aim in this regard should be interaction and cooperation not animosity with Iran and challenging Iranians' legal rights. The discriminatory approaches regarding the MPT that focuses on the obligations of state parties and these regards theorized under the treaty should be discontinued. Therefore, all threats and pressures on Iran should be avoided completely. In addition, in order to have the same transparent common basis in our dialogue, we would like to the West to clarify its stance regarding Israel's nuclear weapons. It is not necessary to mention that the Zionist regime of Israel is not a member of the MPT. Initiation and continuation of negotiations with other countries will be carried out in the context of Iran's interaction with the agency on equal basis and mutual respect. And about the glorious Iran, the Tehran Declaration was a huge deconstructor step in confidence building efforts which was made possible through the admirable goodwill by the governments of Brazil and Turkey along with the sincere cooperation of the Iranian government. Although the declaration received inappropriate reaction by some and was followed by an unlawful resolution, it is still valid. Technically, the fuel cycle of the Islamic Republic of Iran is not different from that of other countries that have peaceful nuclear technology. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes that it is necessary to revitalize the MPT and create an hot committee so that it can combat nuclear weapons and abolish the apartheid in peaceful nuclear technology. In keeping with Iran's reliable right to have access to a nuclear fuel cycle, continued interaction on technical and legal cooperation with the IAEA will be the centerpiece of our nuclear policy. According to the statute of the IAEA, any member has a number of rights and obligations. In fact, all members have to stay on a peaceful path and under this provision of the agency assess other members and they are entitled to be supported by the agency and have access to the fuel cycle with the help of the agency and its members. Some powerful states practice a discriminatory approach against the access of MPT members to material equipment and peaceful nuclear technology and by doing so, in time to impose a nuclear appetite. They have derailed Iran's nuclear issue from its legal tracks and have politicized the atmosphere to impose their wishes through taking advantage of all their potentials. We are concerned that once certain powerful states completely control nuclear energy resources and technology, they will deny access to and thus deepen the divide between powerful countries and the rest of international community. When that happens, we will be divided into large and large countries. What needs our particular attention is the fact that peaceful use of nuclear energy without possession of nuclear fuel cycle is an empty proposition. Nuclear power plants can indeed lead to total dependence of countries and peoples if they need to rely for the fuel on coercive powers which do not refrain from any measure in furtherance of their interests. No popularly elected and responsible government can consider such a situation in the interest of its people. The history of dependence on oil in oil rich countries under domination is an experiment that no independent country is well-equipped. Those hegemonic powers who consider scientific and technological progress of independence and free nations as a challenge to their monopoly on these important instruments of power and who do not want to see such achievements in other countries have misrepresented Iran's healthy and fully safeguarded technological endeavors in the nuclear field as perceived of nuclear weapons. This is nothing but a propaganda floor. The Islamic Republic of Iran is presenting in good faith its proposal for constructive interaction and a just dialogue. However, if some try to impose the airwheel on Iranian people to resort to a language of force and threat with Iran, we will reconsider our entire approach to the nuclear issue. We have observed the regulations of the IAEA more than our commitments yet we have never submitted to illegally imposed pressures nor will we ever do so. It has been said that they want to pressure Iran into a dialogue. Well, firstly Iran has always been ready for a dialogue based on respect and justice. Secondly, methods based on disrespecting nations have long become ineffective. Those who have used intimidation on sanctions in response to the clear logic of the Iranian nation are in real time destroying the remaining credibility of the Security Council and the trust of nations for this body, proving once and again how unjust is the function of the council. When they threaten a great nation such as Iran which is long throughout history for its scientists, poets, artists and philosophers and whose culture and civilization is synonymous to purity, submission to God and seeking justice, how can they ever expect that other nations to have confidence in them? It goes without saying that domineering methods in managing the world has failed. Not only has the era of slavery and colonialism and dominating the world passed the path to the reviving old empire's art block too. We have announced that we stand ready for a serious and free debate with the American statesman to express our transparent views on issues of importance to the world in this very venue. It is proposed here that in order to have a constructive dialogue and a new free debate, be organized within the general assembly. In conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, the Iranian nation and the majority of the world's nations and governments are against the current discriminatory management of the world. The inhumane nature of this management has put it at a dead end and requires a major overhaul, reforming the world affairs and bringing about triangulation for us for it to require the participation of all pure thoughts and the divine and humane management. Thank you, Iran. And let's give the brief to Iraq. Ladies distinguished chair, first of all we are great to thank the United Nations that provide us this meeting. We know that United Nations has many responsibilities and its undertaking mission is not easy to not demote so we are placed to be here and to be a part of this meeting. We know that the aim of this meeting is a controversial issue and we hope to depart from this meeting in peaceful solutions. As you know that Iraq is an important part of Middle East and it includes many different ethnic identities like other Middle Eastern countries. So this situation sometimes caused problematic issues among ethnic groups. Therefore, we really worked hard to establish our new government and give the difficult election period. Iraq always aims to be a powerful state in the Middle East. However, Iraqi people suffered the issue of this aim in history. Many civil people died because of terror and war in Iraq territories. It indicates that Iraq society lived painful experiences such as Iran-Iraq war, Gulf War and U.S.-Iraq war. Especially in Iraq, Iran-Iraq war lasted for eight years. It was the longest war of the 20th century. After these wars, Iraq experienced social, economic and political aggravations. Therefore, Iraq society really knows the negative effects of wars and terror. Although Iraq lived these painful experiences, we finally achieved to establish the new government of Iraq. With this new process, Iraq aims at peace for relations in both domestic and international affairs. Of course, those new initiatives passed long and hard period. We tried to establish our new government within 10 months. The most forceful of administrative process was to balance of political voices and ideas between different ethnic groups. Nowadays, conspiracy issues subject for all world countries is increasing the nuclear capabilities. As an Iraqi government, we cannot stand in a passive position. On the other hand, we must protect our international balance, which was provided after long and painful experiences of Iraqi people. Because we got peaceful relations with our neighbors and U.S. after a long process. So we are in favor of maintaining our international policies with balancing, peaceful approaches, and we want to emphasize that our priority is to provide our domestic affairs. If we turn to the subject of this meeting, we want to believe that the aim of the countries which have nuclear capabilities is peaceful content. Iran has importance of being one of our neighbors. So Iran use of this nuclear capabilities effect Iraq directly. But we know that sharing historical backgrounds with Iran, for this reason Iran may not endanger our territorial integrity or other countries. And we think that Iran's claims about nuclear trade is only exaggeration of its abilities in order to survive its regime. As we mentioned above, we don't want to see insecure situation in the Middle East. Therefore, the other nations approach to this subject is significant for us. All the world tried to look at this situation in an optimistic way. We have doubts and concerns because of perspectives of other countries. So we beg from other countries and institutions to change their perspectives. Thank you. Thank you. Secretary General, excellent excellently distinguished members of the council. I would like to begin by thanking you for bringing this emergency meeting which provides yet another opportunity to reflect the activities of the security general and on Iran's nuclear program. I am here today with my colleagues on behalf of Turkey to discuss this issue. First, we would like to emphasize that we strongly reject the idea of nuclear proliferation not just for Iran but for every country in the region, especially those who assigned the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That being said, we strongly oppose any hardline actions the United States and or Israel might consider taking against Iran. Moreover, we would like to emphasize that the IAEA has no hard evidence that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons and Iran has certain rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to pursue a civilian nuclear program. And a possible war between Iran and U.S. and or Israel would deeply harm the stability of the region. Additionally, we would like to state that although we are committed to the collective effort that may be necessary to solve this issue, we also have a national interest in developing and maintaining economic relations with our neighbor and we will consider our domestic interests as we consider any multilateral actions. In this light, we would also like to address the issue of the economic sanctions passed in the United Nations Resolution 1929. We disagree with the current sanctions against Iran because we believe they hurt the civilian population, cripple Iran's economy, and the economies of the country which have economic relations with Iran. And most importantly, we believe that there are more effective means of diplomacy that can be used to persuade Iran to cooperate more fully with the international nuclear non-proliferation efforts. The Tehran Declaration was an important opportunity to provide a confidence for diplomacy and Turkey is ready for any further diplomatic diplomacy necessary to solve this problem. On the other hand, we would like to remind that historically Turkey has been an ally of both the United States and Israel. Turkey was one of the first countries that acknowledged Israel as a state in 1949. However, we are deeply concerned that the policy of the United States and Israel towards Iran causes instability in the region. Essentially, we think that both the United Nations and the United States should shift their focus from a stick-only policy and focus their energy on construction, constructing a more rational course of action. In this point, we want to emphasize that Turkey's concerns about Iran's nuclear programs are still valid. There are serious questions about this issue. Iran needs to be more transparent and should be eager to cooperate with the IAEA. We recommend that Iran should accept the additional protocol to prove that they have no intentions to produce nuclear weapons. Ultimately, in alignment with our rejection of the economic sanctions that currently inhibit Iran, we propose a treaty that would require Iran to show a more active commitment to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in exchange for ending the economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations Resolution 1929. Thank you. Syria, let's switch. I hope this will be a historic moment, a moment that will start changing the future of the region. We are deeply concerned about possible actions that will be taken against Iran by both the United States and Israel. There is more than one way in dealing with crisis. You can either resort to dialogue or you can resort to force. History teaches us that force does not solve conflicts. The use of force does not solve problems, but it creates bigger problems. Iran is not a small country. Iran is a big and strategic country which controls a good chunk of world oil, waterways, and it's a country which has a culture and history. So when a 60, 70 years old state Israel threatens Iran, we can clearly say that Iran, Israel is playing with fire. If attacking Iran's nuclear facilities considered to be an option, it will be wise to consider the fact that Iran is not Iraq in the 1980s with one nuclear reactor that was born by the Israelis, Ozarak. Iran has dozens of facilities spread all over the country. Attacking them will actually mean annihilation of a nation.  This is not viable and this is not acceptable. This will have ramifications for all countries in the region. This will mean the beginning of a new world war. So we are totally against that. On the other hand we don't believe America or Israel will attack Iran militarily although they threaten a lot because they know the outcome and ramifications of attacking Iran militarily. Iran is a strong country with strong army and attacking Iran is not a joke. This could mean the spread of violence throughout Middle East and beyond. The lesson from resorting to use of force the invasion of Iraq is still very vivid in our minds. We can see the results of invasion. We can see the democracy and prosperity that was and particularly America is talking about. Civilians are being killed every day in Iraq. There is no security, no prosperity, no progress, no democracy. Iraq has not been able to form a government now for more than seven months. So where is the democracy? Before we had one Saddam, now maybe we have 200 Saddams in Iraq. This is not the democracy we want. This is not the Middle East we want. This is not the type of prosperity, stability and security we want. We are also totally against imposing sanctions. When an embargo is imposed to a country poor people get affected first. Health care system, welfare system and everything that keeps a nation together get hit by sanctions. Then everybody becomes your enemy and they become closer to the government to the regime. So it has actually a backfiring impact. As in the case of Iraqi sanctions they directly get the people, not the regime itself. Sanctions imposed to Iraq killed over one million Iraqi babies and poor people. But the regime was there for 10, 15 years after the sanctions. They couldn't actually topple down the regime in Iraq through sanctions and that's why they resorted to use of force. Therefore considering sanctions as a solution for convincing Iran is not feasible. Iran is almost 100% self-sufficient. They can manufacture anything including military weapons. Whatever they cannot import from other countries now they can manufacture in Iran. Implementation of sanctions to Iran therefore will blemish any peaceful attempts that we are trying to find. Establishment of permanent peace in the region cannot be attached to only Iran and its nuclear programs. This will only undermine the real threat. The hostile nature of Israeli and their way of solving conflicts like occupation of our territory, other Arab and Muslim territory, murders in Gaza, raids to flow till there are only a few examples out of dozens. Tell us about negative indication towards setting up a permanent peace. With all these facts in mind, particularly Israel's insistence on not signing the non-proliferation treaty, Israel's resistance on international pressure to open its nuclear facilities, particularly the one in Devona in Negev Desert, to international inspections adding the fact that we are leaked by Israeli nuclear agent Mordahai Wanunu who was later arrested and jailed by Israeli. The leaks he gave to a newspaper about the massive nuclear arsenal that Israel has, all these are ringing alarm bells that Israel has nuclear weapons and as you all know its words kept secret. As a conclusion, we are a signatory country to the non-proliferation treaty and we have advocated the creation of nuclear weapon free zone in the Middle East since 2003. Syria is against weapons possessed by any country. We believe in the peaceful use of such technology so we support Iran's right in having a peaceful nuclear program. The same way as we support any country's right to have peaceful nuclear program but this does not mean that we accept any country to have nuclear weapons and we have chosen peace as our strategic choice long long time ago. 1991 Madrid conference and the ongoing peace process can be considered as a clear indication, a signal for this. Because of this reason our position in solving conflicts has not changed particularly for this topic. We believe civilized international relations must be built on openness and dialogue rather than isolation and aggression. Our work is setting up genuine security and stability in the Middle East through our dialogue, through our ties, investments, helping people know each other and invest in one another's country. This is how you create stability by creating better opportunities for the people, better economy, better education, better healthcare system and such. This is the security and prosperity that we are cherishing in the Middle East. Thank you. Thank you. Saudi Arabia. In the name of God, the merciful, the compassionate, your majesties, highnesses, excellencies, peace and the mercy and blessings of God be with you. I'm talking on the behalf of custodian of the two holy mosques King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al Saud in the presence of this gathering of international leaders and representatives of General Assembly. Firstly we would like to state that we are deeply concerned about weapons of massive destruction due to their disastrous effects on humankind. They create a major threat against national security and stability of the Middle East and the world as a whole. Therefore we adhere strictly to the Treaty of Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Treaty of Nuclear Nonproliferation. We support the rights of all countries of peaceful use of nuclear energy, including the countries that have not yet attempted to acquire such power. Our desire of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction is imminent, especially in the Middle East and Gulf region. Iran's lack of cooperation with international atomic energy agency and Iran's lack of transparency about this nuclear ambitions has caused an augmentation in our suspicions. These suspicions concern us greatly due to the possible outcomes such as increased armament and weapons of mass destruction that will lead to regional instability. Another issue linked with proliferation is the case of Israel. We restate our desire of purifying the region of any weapons of mass destruction. We observe that there is double standards applied to the issue of Israel. Since Israel is not a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, they cannot be subject to any monitoring by the international organizations. This has reduced the effects of Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and we hide this suspect that when the world is not taking the necessary measures in the issue of Israel. This fact can be shown as one of the reasons that Iran refuses to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency. In addition, Iran justifies its nuclear program by showing Israel's nuclear attack against Iran which resulted in an increase in the desire of nuclear power among the other Arab states. We must apply the necessary sanctions which will cause Israel to abandon its nuclear ambitions. This will also increase the reliability of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Our last point is related to Israel's occupation of Palestinian lands. Israel's cruel attitudes against the Palestinian civilians and Israel's bombings of Lebanon has increased tensions providing an atmosphere suitable to extremism and terrorism. The situation has supported Iran's ambition of nuclear program. Therefore, Israel should immediately withdraw from the Palestinian territory and recognize the rights, their rights. In a less conflictive environment, we believe that the Middle Eastern countries will refrain from pursuing their nuclear ambitions or at least continue under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Our desire is to see the issues solved under the frame of international law and dialogue. Thank you. Thank you. Egypt. Thank you, Honorable Chair and distinguished members of the international community. Today, we gathered here to address a very serious matter of the Middle Eastern region. However, by having global civil consequences, Iranian nuclear issue must be a great concern for all of the international society. Egypt is sharing a great concern with the international society about the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons in the region and about the development of nuclear weapons by Iran and declaring that we are ready to work with all parts who are interested in protecting the stable and the secure environment of the Middle East. We are reaffirming the Egypt's position in support of Iran's right to pursue nuclear energy by saying that all signatories of the non-proliferation treaty are entitled to maintain nuclear energy programs with civilian applications. However, the Egyptian delegation disapproves Iran's delay in informing IAEA about the construction of its uranium enrichment facilities in which international community disappointed to learn revelations about Natanzan Arak facilities in August 2002. It was the clear indication of secret intentions of the Iran to develop nuclear weapons and thus a violation of both superit and the letter of the Article 2 of the NPT. We as the Egyptian delegation cannot discard the unclear intentions of the Iranian regime since the Iranian nuclear program is posing a great threat to our region in 2010. In order to overcome this problem from the beginning, Egypt pursued an active diplomacy that aims freeing Middle East from nuclear weapons and at a later stage from all VMS. In 1966, Egypt energized its diplomatic campaign against nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. Especially within the context of United Nations and preferred the diplomatic approach to nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament since the mid-1960s. Our country participated actively in the NPT negotiations and subjects its unclear facilities to the IAEA safeguard system through signing NPT in 1968 and ratifying it in 1981. In April 1990, our President Mubarak developed Egypt's diplomatic efforts and launched his initiative for establishing a VMD free zone in the Middle East. And Egypt takes part in Tracture Diplomacy forums and leads the Arab League efforts aimed at establishing and drafting and agreement on VMD free zone in the Middle East. Between 2007 and 2009, we expressed our concerns with the statements that escalations between Iran and the West over Tehran's nuclear program are posing a threat to security in the Middle East and the Gulf region. My fellow delegates, we have enough conflict and instability in our region. We do have economic problems, social problems and constant terrorist actions of some proxy groups all over the region. And there is still Palestinian conflict going on as a threat to stability of the whole region. In that sense, we are insisting of the stabilization of the Middle East region through peaceful means and international cooperation. We are not accepting a further problem which is not contributing to the welfare and the stability of our region. But the creation of hostile environment for the parties in the region and nuclear proliferation as general, the Iranian actions as particular are one of the urgent methods that UN Security Council should be able to address its possible solutions today and for coming sessions. Therefore, Egyptian delegation is reaffirming Egypt's support for every country's right to obtain nuclear power for peaceful purposes according to the principles of NPT. As we recently rejected the use of force potential solution to Iran's nuclear program in April 2010, nuclear security summit in Washington, D.C. An Egyptian delegation is emphasizing that the international community will find diplomacy more appropriate than sanctions or military action. Since we do not think that more sanctions are the right way to deal with Iran. Therefore, Egyptian delegation is calling Iran to acknowledge and cooperate with the international community's demands regarding its nuclear program. We are urging Iran to show transparency over the nature of its nuclear program. And as it's stated in the charter of these United Nations, our countries pledge to work for the promotion of economic and social advancement of all peoples. I believe in these sessions, all members of the international community have enough to impose its policies that will contribute the great aim of the United Nations which is providing worldwide peace and security for all of these people. Thank you very much. Thank you. Now it's turn to the European Union. Honorable Secretary General and Honorable Delegates, we are gathered here today in order to discuss the security of Middle East specifically Iran's nuclear program. As the European Union we are concerned and also find threatening the nuclear program of Iran yet we do not find military action against Iran adequate. We are and always have been pro-diplomatic solutions and believe that United Nations sanctions has good effect on Iran plus Security Council has made clear that all measures against Iran are proportionate and reversible. We as European Union do not deny the right of Iran to pursue nuclear program but Iran does not conflate the responsibilities they have as a voluntary signatory of MPT which creates a non-trust towards Iran in international community. As long as Iran does not conflate to international atomic energy agency and does not act transparent on this issue specifically then as European Union we can question whether Iran is pursuing nuclear power for peaceful aims or not. In 2003 the undisclosed activities of Iranian authorities raised serious doubts about the Iranian nuclear program and the unwillingness of compliance to IAEA rules as EU in 2005, 2006 and May 2008 represented far-reaching proposals which would help Iran to develop a modern civil nuclear power program. Regrettably Iran could not meet IAEA's requests and provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. As European Union we do not turn a blind eye towards Israel's nuclear program. We regularly love Israel about the importance of signing MPT but our efforts are abolished due to Israel's concerns regarding developing nuclear programs of other countries in the region. Iran's equation of nuclear power will lead to other countries in the region to follow Iran which will finally lead to high instability in the region resulting on damage on Middle East peace process. As European Union we are completely unified in the thought of a vision of Middle East free of arsenals. Our requisition from Iran is suspension of uranium enrichment addressing unanswered questions and abidance by the additional protocol of MPT. As a reward of cooperation Iran will receive wide-ranging package of incentives including full political and technological support for a peaceful nuclear program. First of all Iran has to rebuild trust, show good faith and willingness. Thus Iran has failed to explain why they are rushing to enrich uranium when they have no nuclear power stations which could use Iranian nuclear fuel. A blind eye cannot be turned towards Iran's nuclear program for as much as we will risk future where the origin of nuclear population is undermined and weapons of mass destruction more available and ready for the use of terrorist networks at rogue states. As European Union our main concern is peace and stability and in order to preserve these we repeatedly state our full support in order to find a negotiated solution. That's my best regards thank you. Thank you. Russian Federation? The Honorable Chair and the Honorable Bask. We are gathered here in a very important issue that has the potential of affecting the whole world and if misjudged has a power-reaching consequence we know that you might have question marks in your head regarding today's issue and thus supplying this nuclear technology and nuclear fuel to our Iran. We have our own reasons to do so but these can be concluded as economic interests and positive political relations in the region and with Iran. The first thing we need to clarify is that we do not support Iran's non-compliance with IAEA, safeguard agreements and also need to clarify we would not support Iran having nuclear military power but moreover they cannot be prevented from the right of having nuclear energy technology as they are also member of MPT and we would like to add that there is no solid proof regarding they do have nuclear military power so they do not deserve such sanctions, such negative sanctions and actions. If that is the case we are also ready for more accurate and positive sanctions and ready to change our point of view if there is a proof is supported but for the time being this their nuclear ambition seems to be far from being aggressive and just as they are also part of the MPT we have seen misjudgment against nations before but we require more feasible proofs and facts before judging us and Iran today. Although they violated several voluntary safeguard agreements and requirements it is yet not possible to provide aggression in their program. Our attendance and support in recent NATO meeting regarding the shield defense against missile destruction missiles shows our point of view in such case we are against. Having nuclear energy will be a leverage for the Iran economy and situation in there and therefore a step for the Middle East too. Preventing this from them against the human rights and having even aggressive sanctions and actions would violate human rights. Provoking and even attacking Iran's nuclear reactors have a far-reaching negative conclusions, provoking the neighbors, provoking any who opposes and this might conclude in World War III. Moreover Iran is not a nation to underestimate and offend with baseless accusations. Not yet attacked but enforced negative sanctions, cryptic Iran's economy and therefore Iran in total. This is not the way how to keep peace and stability in the region. War would only need to more suffering in the region. Now we ask you the region have not yet suffered enough in the purpose of best nation demands and actions. On the other hand Iran has obligations and have to comply with MPT and ease our minds about the issue and IAA safeguard agreements in order to have support of the whole world. In conclusion no nation should be prevented from achieving their birth rights in the peaceful manner and therefore achieve nuclear technology. We are ready to support and already did. If the world peace is kept and we are against any aggressive measure where Iran have to work more in convincing outside minds of their peaceful purposes. Thank you. Thank you. And lastly Jordan. Nuclear is a matter of energy. Nuclear technology works can be applied in almost any field. Iran you can replace with oil, electric, central and industrial materials. The increasing interest in the region in nuclear power is because of high prices. Countries who don't have oil are not looking for other options to generate energy. We also believe that the regional drive is filled by economic necessity. However, having nuclear program for peaceful purposes is not a problem but if we have more than new needs it can cause really crucial danger for people. As we know today we are here to discuss Iran's nuclear program issue. Iran's nuclear program has become the subject of contention with the western world due to suspicious that Iran could divert civilian nuclear technology to a weapons program. Even if Iran declared that its nuclear program for use for peaceful purposes but Iran tries to enrich their nuclear power. Their nuclear power. Since Iran signs non-proliferation treaty Iran has to obey not to enrich their nuclear power. The reasons that Iran give us for providing their nuclear power is not pervasive because Iran has got nuclear works more than it needs to produce energy. Therefore Iran is suspicious about nuclear power. Iran can use the surplus of nuclear energy to produce nuclear weapons. In that case we are not support any kind of nuclear power. The reason why we do not want nuclear power in this territory is because of secret structures and economical consequences. In any Iran's war case this can cause the third world war. Due to the fact that Iran has huge power in the military and nuclear power is very destructive. Moreover if there is any nuclear war in the Middle East it affects us accordingly. The main problem is immigration. Jordan is developing developing country and our natural resources are very limited. Thus huge amounts of immigration into our country will lead us into economic crisis. As a result we have really limited national resources. We have just potassium and uranium. We must use our uranium as nuclear energy program in order to handle with our economical problems. We are always the part of peacekeeping in the Middle East and countries which have same opinion with us they can use nuclear power. Nuclear powers for all, nuclear weapon for none. We are just against for all the things which destroy the pieces in the Middle East and especially which country abuse nuclear energy. I thank you for all for your dedication of this cause and for giving me the opportunity to speak with you today. Thank you. Thank you for explanations and second part will be held after five minutes break. Distinguished delegates now we are opening up resolution part for taking your and getting your advice and giving your opinion to me and my other delegates and my other colleagues, my other ministers and Excellencies. Okay I want to get your resolution resolutionary thing and okay let's start with USA and with your resolution to Iranians nuclear program and what's your advice and what have to be what has to be to follow in the direction of NPT program? As we mentioned for in our speech Iran has to mention its nuclear program as a peaceful purposes and clearly defined its aims in addition to this. We must we of course have the account of bilateral relations with Iran however that that must be in terms of stability cooperation not coercion that's our resolution for our speech. So Iran must clearly indicate its peaceful purposes for the nuclear program related to IAEA and relations must be held in a compatible and cooperative way with peaceful applications. Is there a comment for the United States applications and advisory reform? Is there a comment? No? Okay I'm passing to Syria's resolution. He stated that israels have some negative attitudes and an aggressive manner and it's no certain evidence on the nuclear program of Iran and Israel had certainly nuclear weapons he said. No negative sanctions over Iran would be continued by sanctions through using sanctions and what about this solution? At first thank you Madam Secretary General for giving me the opportunity to speak to you all. Israel has annexed in violation of security council orders a large part of our territory the Golan Heights we are making it very clear that we are interested in a peace settlement with Israel which will involve as it should the withdrawal of Israeli troops from occupied territories. So far Israel has been the has been flatly refusing any negotiations. In fact the only debate that's going on now is whether it's the United States that's pressuring Israel or Israel's pressuring the United States to prevent negotiations on the Golan Heights and in fact on the occupied territories all together. It's a contentious issue because the US government and the Israeli government are blocking ever-broad international consensus which has almost universal support even the majority of Americans and which has been on the table for about 30 years blocked by the US and Israel with this representing an example of clear hostile approach of Israel to the regional conflicts. The destabilization of our region is stemming from the approaches of United States and Israel mode. So if stability and peace is our ultimate goal such aggressive stance should not be tolerated in the region. So Iran should not be tolerated with its aggressive manner. Okay is there any comment? Is there an additional opinion? We have made our intentions very clear that Syrian stance towards non-proliferation treaty has always been positive. In fact we do believe that non-proliferation treaty is extremely significant for both regional and global peace and security. However we also believe that there are a lot of laws with the way it's being implemented and Israel is a very good example for that apart from India and Pakistan. That's why there is always an NCRT and whether the arsenal of nuclear weapons misuse or abuse. So that's why the world has to be very strict in implementing non-proliferation treaty particularly to the countries with hostile history such as Israel. Since its establishment it has been occupying lands of other countries Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan. When you have such a history Arabs and Muslims have a right to be worried of Israel possessing such weapons and they were states in previous wars between Arabs and Israel when Israel was defeated in 1973. They were that close resorting to the use of a nuclear weapon. So the possibility is always there and our warnings are genuine. Our fare is genuine that when Israel feels cornered it will resort to the use of nuclear weapons. This is a real treat to peace and stability in the Middle East. We need a better system and stricter way of implementing the non-proliferation. We have set out the standards. We have the set out rules that is fair for everybody than the punishment should be very severe for countries who violates those rules. But at the moment there are double standards. Therefore when we know that nobody has the right to have nuclear weapons then we will be very happy to comply. Thank you. Thank you. Here's our proposal. Currently nuclear weapons possessor states like Israel and America is considering nuclear weapons as a deterrent. But again history teaches us that the only deterrence is actually thinking properly and having a proper mind. This is the only deterrence. Because what happens so far when one country has a nuclear weapon all other countries will attempt to have nuclear weapons. They need a deterrent as well. When Israel is the only country that has nuclear weapon this is not being a deterrent at all. This is actually a motive for other countries to attempt to acquire nuclear weapons. So it is not a deterrent. It is actually a stimulus for having a nuclear weapon by other countries. Why should we as Arabs and Muslims trust that Israel will not abuse nuclear weapons and we have no right to have nuclear weapons? That's why the only solution is that nobody should have nuclear weapons. Thus before tackling the situation in Iran proliferators like Israel and the United States should get rid of them their nuclear arsenals. Israel has hundreds of weapons and Iran is being located and put under terrible sanctions because of suspicion. There is not one proof now that Iran has a military nuclear program. Not one single proof. There isn't. Only on the basis of suspicion they are imposing sanctions on Iran. For the case of Israel they are proof that they have nuclear warheads and they do not sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and nobody is doing anything. That's why we feel very bitter, angry, disappointed in a way that the world powers particularly are what is considered as civilized west have been dealing with this part of the world. There are obvious double standards which have been largely behind Israel's aggressive actions and their insistence on the occupation of the Arab lands because they feel they can do whatever they want. Nobody imposes anything on them. There is no one single United Nations resolution against Israel that has been implemented. They don't listen to UN. They don't listen to United Nations Security Council. They don't listen to anybody. This attitude has to change in dealing with our fragile region of problems. Apart from that, true solutions to the conflict go through the adoption of comprehensive dialogues. Israel lands appropriation, their stance towards non-proliferation treaty, murders in international Sikhs and such, are creating deeper problems. This approach cannot be tolerated in such a fragile environment. Therefore peace can be genuine only if there's the genuine will to make peace. We wish to see a just comprehensive peace achieved by implementing Security Council resolutions 242, 338 and Arab peace initiative for that matter. Syria was ready to resume peace talks from the point where they had stopped through the Turkish mediator if it found in Israel a committed partner to such terms of reference. We want to see a permanent peace that returns to land and it's rise to the rightful owners. Thank you. Okay Turkey, we have our speakers. Thank you Secretary General on Iran because it will deteriorate the infrastructure and services. It will deteriorate the infrastructure and services of Iran and it will have a backfire on Turkey's economic stance as well. However, we also believe that if Iran should be transparent then Israel should also be transparent. Israel's insistence on not signing the nuclear proliferation treaty causes suspicion that they have nuclear weapons. This is the truth of the matter. Although we do not accuse Israel of having nuclear weapons it is pretty clear. We support Iran in having the right to have a peaceful nuclear program and we also agree that they should not pursue nuclear weapons. We promote openness and dialogue not isolation as Syria stated. Thank you. Thank you. Okay Iran. Madam Secretary General for giving me the opportunity to talk to you. Let's talk to you in the name of God. As it is aforementioned, Islamic Republic of Iran is a member of IAEA and is committed to the NPT. All our nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful and under watchful eyes of IAEA inspectors. However, there are some objections to our legally recognized rights and governments which are abused nuclear technology for non-peaceful ends including production of nuclear bombs and even have a record of using them against humanity object to these rights. We believe that nuclear weapons are a fire against humanity and in response to concerns or accusations about the unwillingness to cooperate with International Committee Iran welcomes the dialogue with the West on a equal basis and mutual respect. The aim in this regard should be interaction and cooperation, not animosity with Iran and challenging Iranian's legal rights. The discriminatory approach regarding the NPT that focuses on the obligations of state parties and this regards their rights under the treaty should be discontinued. Therefore, alteration and pressures on Iran should be avoided completely. In addition, in order to have the same transparent common basis in our dialogue, we would like to the West to clarify its stance regarding Israel's nuclear weapons. It is not necessary to mention that the Zionist regime of Israel is not a member of the NPT. Initiation and continuation of negotiations with other countries will be carried out in the context of Iran's interaction with the agency on a equal basis and mutual respect. And about the glories Iran, the Tehran declaration was a hugely constructive step in confidence building efforts which was made possible through admirable good by the governments of Brazil and Turkey along with the cooperation of the Iranian government. Although the declaration received inappropriate reactions by some and was followed by an unlawful resolution, it is still valid. And U.S. intention is nothing but to make this deprivation of Iran's inalienable right to enrichment a technology final and internal. And that the U.S. is completely silent on Israel's nuclear enrichment and weapons program. And again, I want to emphasize that the Zionist regime of Israel is not a member of the NPT. The committee should be also asked to investigate as to how contrary to NPT material technology and equipment for nuclear weapons were transferred to the Zionist regime and to propose the practical measures for the establishment of a nuclear weapon free zone in the Middle East. I would also like to announce that those states who have shown hostility towards the Iranian nation for last years offended and accuses our people who have contributed to the history and civilization of the world and our advice them to learn from history and their recent actions. Thank you. Okay, U.S. aid. Thank you, Honorable Jaideh, the Honorable Secretary-General to the party. I want to answer you the Iranian U.S. Accurations for U.S. On the March 26th in 2008, Iran denounced the Secretary-Consul Resolution as politically motivated and illegal because the Security Council had never found Iran's enrichment to be a threat to the peace under the Article 39 of the UN Charter and therefore not binding on Iran. Iran denounces the transformation of what had been voluntarily measures such as suspension of enrichment into mandatory measures under the Resolution. Iran complies of the hypocrisy of the great powers accusing Iran of violating U.S. Security Council resolutions when they themselves are in gross violation of their obligations under Article 1, 4 and 6 of the NPT to move towards universal disarmament and not aid other countries such as Israel in acquiring nuclear weapons. We really suspicious about Iran's peaceful nuclear purposes after this after this declaration and we also just wonder how they can respond to the Security Council's resolutions in terms of nuclear weaponry. Thank you. Very important to ask that there is a double-skill right and perhaps the implementation of sanctions aren't comparable, right? We have ignored the right to process the peaceful nuclear program. With that right comes responsibility and Iran needs to restore trust with the international community. They continue silence on possible defunzation activities combined with the revelation of secret enrichment sites and aggressively towards that little to restore trust in their intentions but merely as to our concerns on their program. Area efforts in 2006 secure the generous package of incentives including assistance in developing a civil nuclear program and scientific and economic cooperation. These offers are still on the table and Iranian cooperation with the international community is the best way of opening the country up for access to technological advances exploiting musicals and enjoying prosperity. Also the EU supports the vision of the Middle East totally free of nuclear arsenals. The EU live regularly with Israel about the importance of signing up to the NPT. Both such efforts are undermined by Israel's concern that hostile regional powers are developing their own such program. This doesn't mean we should ignore other professional threats. If Iran occurs nuclear weapon technology there's a strong possibility that other states in the region would follow and the Middle East with several nuclear weapon states would lead to high instability precures energy security. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Our policy on this issue is Iran should not be isolated and pushed away by the rest of the world regarding economic embargoes and negative sanctions that their business is their own together with IAA. Imposed sanctions are irrelevant due to the fact that they are baseless. Israel and the US should give up their aggressive and negative position and everything should be concluded in peaceful manner. Iran needs to comply with IAA IAA terms and save cars more and clarify the peaceful intentions. Okay. What's your opinion Egypt? Firstly, our perpetrator is our resolution. As we have stated before, Egypt has been against nuclear penetration in the Middle East whether it is perpetrated by Arab or non-Arab states. In the Iranian case, since Iran is a sanitary state to the NPT we acknowledge that the fact that it has right to have nuclear power but just only for peaceful purposes. However, it is hard to be sure about the peaceful intentions about Iranian regimes and enrichment program. Also, in addition to that, we are, as an Egyptian delegation, opposed all the double standards of yes and non-peaceful international solutions to the Iranian nuclear program. So, we are calling an absolute diplomatic resolution to the international conflict over Iranian nuclear program and we believe that Iran must uphold its obligations according to international atomic energy agency and non-proliferation treaty. Thank you. What is your resolution Jordan? Oh, I'm sorry. Okay, so they're Arabians. The United States knows the situation at least the efficiency of the NPT. So, the United States could push on Israel to cooperate with international atomic energy agency and in addition to this, the United States ignores Israel's expansionist and extremist policies and Israel's cruel treatment against Palestinian civilians and this situation increases extremism and terrorism in the region and in addition to this, this situation increases interest in nuclear weapons. Therefore, the United States could push on Israel to recognize Palestinian people's civil rights and Israel's giving out expansionist policies in the Middle Eastern regime. Iran's say that this nuclear program is peaceful but Iran's doesn't remove doubts about this nuclear program. Why? Why agree with international atomic energy agency and we expect from Iran to prove it is nuclear programs to peaceful and Iran increases influence in terms of the Middle Eastern neighbors, internal Iran internal affairs of its neighbors to increase its influence in the region and this situation increases instability in the Middle Eastern region. Therefore, in addition to Iran uses shared blocks in Middle Eastern regions to increase instability and conflicts. Therefore, we expect from Iran to give up these policies. Okay, thank you. So, if I'm not mistaken, you stated on that because of the conflicts in the region in the Middle East and the aggressiveness of Israel Palestine issue which influences Iranian foreign policies towards Middle Eastern countries. USA have to put pressure on that issue to resolve it. Is that right? Yes, it's right. Okay, is there a comment on Saudi Arabia's resolution? Okay, then the United States. One of course, we of course respect any of religious and we are against the divide the world in terms of any classification for humanity. However, I would also like to emphasize that we take very seriously the comprehensive Iran sanctions accountability and divestment and provisions regarding human rights concerns in Iran. Earlier this fall we designated eight senior Iranian officials for human rights abuses and we are working with Treasury on other potential designations. One of the best ways in which we and others can support the cause of universal human rights in Iran and the brave people who defend them is to hold accountable people who deny them. Okay, thank you. I want to open up the resolution of European Union that on the continuation of the previous sanctions and embargoes on the equipments of military basements in Iran and Iranian capacity military capacity. Is there a comment on that resolution that okay please can achieve the necessary results? You told to support the sanctions that you have imposed on Iran before. These sanctions does not limit the social life, thus can be reversed at any time. As a subject of matter these sanctions concern nuclear weapon equipment development and concerning the situation of Iran and unwillingness to cooperate. Sanctions seem to be the best option to convince Iran non-proliferation nuclear. Thank you. Turkey? Before Turkey? Okay, I want to go on with this question. No, you can continue. Okay, in October two thousand countries in the light of the general approach to fight by the European cause of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, launched the somatic effort aimed at resolving the issue through negotiations. They were joined in 2004 by the EU high representative offering support of the whole EU in 2005 and in June 2006 again in May 2008. They represent power reaching proposal for the Iranian authorities which would help Iran to develop a modern civil nuclear power program. This meeting international concern about its peaceful nature. The proposal offers Iran brought cooperation in the technological and economic file as well as in political and security plans. Thank you. Turkey, you have some too. Thank you, Madam Secretary General. We would like to emphasize that we are strongly disagreeing with the sanctions imposed on Iran because the sanctions will not stop Iran's energy policy. We believe that as other countries emphasize Iran has 19 percent self-sufficient country and this is enrichment policy is not only political and economical issue for Iran. The nuclear program became a national pride on Iran that Iran will not stop. This means that Iran will not stop because of the sanctions. However, sanctions deeply harm the civilian population instead of the revolutionary guards. For this reason we are disagreeing with the sanctions, continuing of the sanctions and actually there is something more rational and more effective ways to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions about the beginning of 2010 with Iran and Turkey signed the sub-optimization declaration. This was a way to level up the confidence and confidence for diplomacy between Iran and other United States, United Nations countries. As you will state, we have another resolution about this issue and you may suppose and we have to response to the United States about the human rights. United States emphasize the human rights but we are focusing on nuclear weapons not human rights in this issue actually as Russia Federation and its Syria emphasize that the sanctions violating human rights or because they harm deeply harm the civilian people in the Iran. Thank you. We want to get your rational solution that may be taken by international community and it could be wise to get your opinion in order to follow a rational choice of action. Could you please explain it in a very specific and explicit way that what can be done in that region especially. Okay we have seen that majority of the countries supporting diplomacy instead of the course of action especially Jordan and Syria emphasize that possible course of action may cause a third world war about this region and we are we are also disagree with the course of action we especially as Russia Federation and Syria said we are disagree with the sanction also. Actually however we have we are also believe we believe that there is a serious suspicions about new Iran's nuclear ambitions Iran should be more transparent and be eager to cooperate with the IAA if they if Iran have no intentions about this issue there is nothing wrong to signing additional protocol in this point we propose a resolution a treaty we propose a treaty that would require Iran to show more active commitment to nuclear non-proficiate treaty in exchange for ending the economic sanction imposed by the United Nations Resolution 99. Thank you, here is about additional protocol and the Transparency. In 2003 we agreed to cooperate with IAA to sign and implement additional protocol as voluntary confidence building measure and to suspend our enrichment and repressing activities during the course of negotiations as long as to EU Tree France Germany and UK agreed to recognize our nuclear rights however in 2006 35 members of board of governors of IAA voted to report safeguards of non-competence to the UN Security Council therefore we suspended our voluntary implementation of additional protocol and all other voluntary and non-negally binding cooperation with IAA beyond what is required by its safeguards agreement. There is no legal basis for our referral to the UN Security Council since IAA has not proven proven that previously undeclared activities had a relationship to a weapons program and that all nuclear material in Iran had been counted for and had not been diverted to military purposes. Thank you. Is there a response to what has been said so far? I would like to stop by stating that Israel has said it prefers to resolve the issue through diplomatic means but has not taken military operation of the table. Concerning MPT we should start by stating that signing MPT is not enough parties should obey the its rules which Iran fails to do as did as did some other Arab countries in the Middle East and signing MPT would mean Arab countries not signing the MPT since it would meant recognition of Israel. We highly doubt if other Middle Eastern countries would be a part of MPT if Israel did sign it at that time. We should also remind other countries nuclear programs be it secret or open which also are reasons for Israel's not signing the MPT. We should again also remind delegates that Israel have never accepted that it has nuclear weapons. It's also highly interesting why some Arab countries and Iran continues to divert attention from nuclear Iran's nuclear program to Palestinian problem. We will not go any further on this issue and respond to them as it's not our reason for gathering here today. Now as a solution Iran should sign and ratify the additional protocol and therefore allow free IAA inspection on its soil. As another solution as was proposed before and rejected by Iran it could be that a nuclear fuel bank could be established so to supply countries with nuclear energy as they write stemming from MPT. Thank you. Okay thank you. USA. We don't expect from Turkey to explain that the deals cost for Iran to ship 2,640 pounds of raw air into Turkey where it would be stored in exchange after Iran would have the right to receive about 265 pounds of material and reach to 12 percent strong Russian flag. Turkey. Turkey admits yes that the very clear swap has occurred but Turkey has good faith to believe that Iran is using its nuclear energy for the turnaround research center and not for nuclear purposes. Okay Israel. On this matter I would like to take attention to a very important point concerning Iran's interactions toward nuclear development and hopefully this would come as proof to our claims. Recently an Iranian informant diplomat said Iran is working toward developing a nuclear block with the help of scientists from North Korea and other countries worldwide. Haidari, the name of the diplomat, has been working for the Iranian foreign ministry office in Tahrir's airport during this time. He said the North Korean experts helped Iran develop nuclear bombs capability and increase the range of Iran's ballistic missiles. Iran's claim therefore for nuclear program as for peaceful means is affected as Haidari noted. If this should not be accepted as a proof for Iran's intentions then the subject should be opened to international search as discussion supported by the UN. Thank you. Thank you. And also we want to give example about stability in the Middle East. Concerning regional stability that Arab countries are talking about stability in the Middle East. Assad and USA according to Syria, Assad and USA causes instability in the Middle East. However we do not support any terrorist organization in the Middle East. These terrorist organizations causes instability in the Middle East and the Syrian president Bashar Assad has bond with Hamas, Hezbollah and Pekalka is the way to develop stability in the Middle East. Okay. Thank you. Egypt. Thank you Madam Chair. The Middle East nuclear weapon free zone will be advantages for all countries in the region including Israel and Iran. No country will have the insecurity of worrying about a possible nuclear war in the region which will be destructive for all concerned. What we need today is two parallel tracks with the participation of all the relevant players. One should move towards the assuming of Israel-Palestinians and Israeli-Arab comprehensive peace and the other should move simultaneously towards the assuming of a nuclear weapons free and weapons of mass destruction free zone in the Middle East. We as the Egyptian delegation urging Israel that success in dealing with Iran will depend to a large extent on how successfully we deal with the establishment of nuclear free zone in the Middle East. Therefore, the choice is simple. Either Israel disarms or the rest of the Arab world goes nuclear. And mutual trust and confidence are particularly important to create the conditions in which nuclear weapon free zone and eventually weapons of mass destruction free zone are likely to be established. And lastly we will be able to reach our resolution during this session in following minutes. Thank you. Thank you. Does anyone want to come in? Is there a question for Israel? We were wondering at what point clearly almost every country here is concerned about your own nuclear program and the fact that you haven't signed the NPT and we are wondering at what point you would sign the NTP and if this would be perhaps a means to get rid of the stick-only policy that the United States and Israel have been pursuing or have been implementing towards Iran? Turkey wants to answer that point. If the United States wants, Iran should sign the additional protocol but if Iran will sign the additional protocol Iran will get some benefits from this activity. We believe that Iran and the United States should get the first comment on Iran. Okay thank you. First Israel and second US. Actually we just responded that stating that the signing the NPT would have meant that Arab countries not signing the NPT since it will be a recognition of Israel. So as I said we hardly doubt if other Middle Eastern countries, Arab Middle Eastern countries would be a part of NPT if Israel did sign it at the very beginning. So I believe we already answered that question. Okay. USA. Any second? I can talk at the moment about the capabilities turning into links. And those who have deferred a change in their foreign policies to translate their words into since direction and see the unique opportunity by choosing dialogue rather than repeating their inefficient answer was correct and then to talk to us. Okay Russian Federation? Signing the treaty is only a protocol but Israel may enable the control and inspection of IAEA or any other agencies into the region regarding this issue if they require Iran to comply with this too. If they don't convince the rest of the world about the threat that Israel may cause then they have no right to be questioned, questioned Iran's position in this manner. Israel is located within the hostile states for our existence today. And of course because of this the best situation for our country actually the the state of Israel is one of the first in the peace in the region because the secure our country. Because of this I think the not actually the taking military action towards in Arab states today but also our states try to defense themselves. We know that actually Iran helped found and organized and trained the organization and provides the terrorist organization and actually the state of Israel directly concerns about the any nuclear capability maybe a hand of the any terrorist organization that the cause the any instability of the region. For some powers claims of promotion of human rights and democracy can only last as long as they can be used as instruments of treasure and intimidation against other nations but when it comes to the interest of rightful claimants concepts such as democracy the right of self-determination of nations respect for the rights and obligations of peoples. International law and justice have no place or value. This is blatantly manifested in the way the elected government of the Palestinian people is treated as well as in the support extended to the Zionist regime. It does not matter if people are murdered in Palestine turned into refugees captured in prison or beset these do not violate human rights. Thank you. Before I include that the nation's weapons relates are apparently continue to be all approachable for IEA report confirms that Iran has a very small quantity of uranium to 12 percent touch but made no assessment of how cloth it might be to produce producing nuclear weapons. Thank you. Something October 2003 and May 2005 Iran enters talk with the E3 on its nuclear program while implementing some confidence building measures. The IAEA details breaches of Iran's safeguards agreement. Iran suspends enrichment and accepts a package of intense safeguards including the additional protocol. However Iran does not answer all questions about certain activities that suggest it's carried out nuclear weapons related work in the past. Thank you. Thank you. It's right by saying we are positioned in hostile territory that's why we don't ratify the MPT. By saying this they mean that they have a protection of nuclear power. And furthermore that's what we are trying to prevent by MPT that a nuclear weaponized world. So if everyone who sees themselves in a hostile territory that they don't ratify the MPT and they pursue nuclear fashion then the world will be lost with nuclear weapons. Thank you. The Egyptian delegation might recall that any sanction of military actions by the use of force will trigger the potential unrest in the region. The national community should not be unfair to the Iranian regime and its national sovereignty. However Israel as the country of this region should also be a member of MPT and the start negotiation with IEA Board of Government by monitoring its facilities because Israel is also an obstacle for free of WMD to the Middle East region. In that point further sanctions are not the ways of contribution peace and security but hardening Iran to sit on the table negotiations with the P5 plus one members. Therefore we sincerely support upcoming diplomatic negotiations in Istanbul with the appreciated efforts of Turkey. Thank you. As we are the advocate of international community we have to open up a drought resolution and we have to end up that resolution. In the circle of first of all Disciplations and the subtitles of the sanctions are required because from the view that getting from Turkey is for us is so optimistic. If you have if you declare your sanctions and diminish its negative effects that it is respectfully normalize our diplomatic relations with Iran they stated on that issue. However it is not that much easier to diminish the sanctions of the our charter and article sanctions towards. Therefore we have to add some rational things on explanations of the not in just for the sanctions but under the cover of our charter as you have mentioned before and all of you are aware of the concern that Iranian nuclear program even if there is no recent and certain evidence on the Iran we have some concerns about it and we are together have to we have to overcome this issue by not unilaterally or bilaterally we have to take a caution that precaution by together with all of us and I need your sanctions it's it will not be under the cover of sanctions namely but we have to need some radical and rational things so the previous sanctions should be regarded and should be continued the sanctions are not for individual purposes they are not in the name of danger for civilian purposes they're just established for military options for Iranian nuclear energy and nuclear program providing nuclear facilities to Iranian military cooperative formulation and formation the companies will not be accepted for those of reason is there any solution for that sanctions okay the previous sanctions will be held and in the next session we have to prevail not the realities we have to over it thank you


Hi, my name is Govind Rubin. I am an artist, theatre maker and designer. And I run a company called Terry and the Cars, which is based between Kuala Lumpur and Melbourne. One of the things about living in Australia that I think took me by surprise was just how warm and friendly Australians actually are. And it was this idea or this notion that if you did your work you get your recognition. I'm very much a city boy. So I grew up in Central in Kuala Lumpur. Growing up I used to love going in and out of the back streets of KL. I studied at the Victorian College of the Arts in Melbourne and I graduated with a major in theatre design, production design to be exact, majoring in lighting. The Victorian College of the Arts I reckon is one of the best art schools in the country, particularly if you're studying production design. Because the VCA production students actually end up working across art forms and genres, which is also a very big reason I do what I do with Terry and the Cars and we actually tell stories across dance, theatre, puppetry and art. So after making theatre for about six years in Malaysia, our first premier of Terry and the Cars work in Australia was at the AusAsia Festival in Adelaide with a project called SKIN, a work based on true stories about human trafficking. And the idea was it was talking about a serious issue in Malaysia and the way we delivered it was sort of fused with very cutting edge Australian style contemporary theatre that garnered a lot of positive press, great reviews and eventually earned us a Melbourne Green Room Award. Australia is a mix of so many different cultures and it's the culture that consistently and constantly wants to learn more. Because for example, in the UK or the US, you know, Broadway or the West End is it and once you're there you're stuck within this bubble because you don't need to go anywhere else, whereas in Australia there's this evolving need to be better, to learn more and I think that makes the theatre here super exciting. Coming to Australia really provided me with structure. It gave me a sense of independence but also a kind of work ethic. That's something which I'll always eternally be grateful to my time in Australia. I think now Australia today is actually one of the richest countries to think about cultural diversity in the world.


Hey everybody, Matt here for Layton Sports Cards ripping one box of 2021-22 Panini Select basketball hybrid. This is for Luke S. Good luck Luke. All right, there's Cade Cunningham rookie, Anto, there's Ant-Man, Anthony Davis, Disco, Cory Kispert rookie, Sean Tate, there's Nicola Jokic, Disco, and Jimmy Butler, that is Blue Disco, 25, yep, 25 of 25. We have Matt M. up after this with a box of stadium club baseball hobby, Kevin Durant, Quentin Grimes, and courtside red, Anthony Davis, that is 15 of 49, Anthony Simons, Silver, all right last pack here, Russell Westbrook, Luca, that is Donovan Mitchell, Disco, Eric Bledsoe, all right Luke, that'll do it for your box, appreciate the purchase, we'll get these right out to you.


I want to propose this phase 3 trial in renal cell carcinoma that just opened. This is Meteor, phase 3 randomized study of Cabuzentinib, a dual VEGF met inhibitor versus Iverolimus and subject with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. As an introduction, this audience know well the role of VEGF and met in RCC. In fact, VHL gene dysfunction predominant in clear cell RCC leads to impaired hip degradation which transcriptionally activates not only the VEGF pathway but also the met pathway. We know well that activated met result in invasive RCC phenotype and we learn from Dr. Gibney and colleagues that higher met expression in clear cell RCC correlate with worse disease specific survival and is completely an independent predictor of survival. We also know from a very important work for Senino et al. that resistance to VEGF pathway target agent can be overcome by inhibition of met. Cabuzentinib is a dual VEGF met tyrosine kinase inhibitor that showed preliminary activity as an investigational agent in multiple solid tumor including renal cell carcinoma in a work that we presented at the 2012 ASCO meeting. This is the design of the phase three metayore study. This will be an open label randomized phase three study of 200 sites primarily in North America and Europe. Patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma 650 with clear cell histology measurable disease and who progressed on prior VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor will be randomized one to one to Cabuzentinib at 60 milligram once a day versus Iverolimus at 10 milligram once a day. It will be again a one to one randomization without crossover. The primary endpoint is progression free survival for independent radiology review and the secondary endpoint are overall survival and objective response rate. These are the statistics. The primary endpoint is PFS analysis for independent radiology committee. We assume five months PFS 4.9 in fact on the Iverolimus trial the record one 259 events are required among the first 375 randomized patient. This is designed to have a 90% power to detect a 50% meaningful improvement in medium PFS from five to 7.5 months which correspond to a hazard ratio of 0.66. We will have power for a secondary endpoint of OS assuming 15 months OS on record one trial with 408 event are required to provide 80% power for a 33% improvement in median OS from 15 to 20 months. There will be a single interim analysis of OS at the time of the primary PFS analysis. In term of additional end point on the study the duration of response the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and to health related quality of life with the help of Dr. Sella, the NCCN functional assessment of cancer therapy, the fact kidney symptom index questionnaire as well as the European health questionnaire will look also a skeletal related event especially with the data with Cabos Antenim in prostate cancer as well as an array of biomarker. In term of key eligibility criteria RCC with clear cell component and measurable disease prior treatment was at least one VEGF targeting TKI no prior treatment was an mTOR inhibitor and for the most recently received VEGF TKI patient need to have progressed during the treatment or treated for at least four weeks and progressed within six months after the last dose. The last dose must have been within six months before randomization and this trial has no limit on the number of additional anti-cancer therapies and in fact it allows patient with brain metastasis and if my voice bored you you only need to go to the Meteor clinical trial dot com and everything will be there. Thank you very much.


Sal writes Jonathan I'd love to meet you for coffee, but it's not a date I would treat you to the coffee for all the advice and help you provided and that has helped me tremendously Thank you so much. So I appreciate that All right deep dive remember I said this is personal questions. So deep diver rights Jonathan What are you looking for in an ideal partner physically mentally emotionally? Is there a preference physically? well, so Great question. So like anyone we all have our physical preferences. I'm six foot two I'm probably attracted to women between five four and five eight. It just happens to be kind of something I like I'm attracted to a athletic Physique I'm attracted to women who are athletic and they're They are physically active and exercise on a regular basis. I'm not attracted. I'm attracted to blondes brunettes I have actually a thing for redheads More dark auburn hair. I'm I have a thing for that I think ever since I fell in love with Stephanie powers in the TV show heart to heart Stephanie powers and heart to heart. I have a big thing for dark auburn hair but I'm not but my ex-wife was a blonde and And I've dated brunettes and such like that What else? Well, shoot I have it on my bulletin board here. I'll read you from my bulletin board See, I actually have my perfect made on a bulletin board. So I'll read you from that We mutually a dire a desire and adore each other We feel safe and accepted with one another. We feel rooted with one another We feel fun and spontaneity together. We are both givers and believe in teamwork. We believe in depth We believe in growth. We believe in intimacy. We believe in flexibility We believe in love and laughter and communicating with one another what's most I think what's most what I'm most attracted to I'm I'm rather sapio sexual What that means is I'm attracted to an inquisitive mind This is one of the reasons why I get rather I use the word bored in the dating realm But most women today to me seem very boring. They don't ask really deep intelligent questions I'm gonna read you a meme that I love that illustrates what I'm looking for since you asked but this meme so feels like Here's the meme Starts off.   I don't want to know what's up So that just gives you an illustration of what I'm looking for in my perfect partner Thank you all for these questions. I appreciate that Carrie says you just described my perfect partner. Well, thank you Yes, I can get bored with a lot of people I like to ask good questions. Sadly folks I do recognize that the vast majority of men and women alike are very emotionally Unskilled and lack the the tools and skills to really communicate at a deeper level and not that I'm sitting here and having intellectual conversations about You know the meaning of life per se, but I like people that go beyond the surface In fact, it's something I learned in sales.   I mean, I've gone on first dates with women who have I've told them I'm a dating a relationship coach and they refused that when I say refused they don't ask me any questions about my profession I have a fun Profession I have a lot of fun with what I do for a living between the YouTube channel the podcast and all the things I do you would think someone would be curious about that. I want I'm Incredibly curious when I meet a woman I'm curious about how she thinks and what she thinks about what she's into and I want someone to be that equally curious But most women are like this on a first date. They're just you know, they're like this They're just filing their nails. They're just filing their nails because it's all about them actually quite frankly I Haven't gone on a first date and I think it's been months and months and months I mean I did meet a friend recently which felt like a date But I haven't gone on a real first date in a long time because most women don't spark my curiosity I'm now this listen.    Yes, then it's a hell. No, I think that's Mark Manson So anyway or Alan call Cohen calls it a hell. Yes to me if it doesn't feel like a hell. Yes to meet someone I'm not interested, but that's just me and maybe that's why I'm still single, but who knows I just haven't met my person yet All right


Hey guys, Alex here from AlexFrigus.com. In this video, I'm going to do a quick mini-review of the Mitre Pro Mitre Red Light. Be sure to subscribe because I will be publishing a deep deep dive review of the same panel where I go into all sorts of metrics and comparisons and criticisms, but in this video I want to keep it nice and short. Now I've been using this panel for a few weeks now. I'm very familiar with it. I've tested it with all sorts of meters, my ElectroSmog meter, spectrometer and all sorts of things. So I've got some interesting insights and I do have to say that yes, I think this panel is exceptionally good value and does everything well. All the main stuff, very, very well. So let's get into it. What do you need to know about this panel? Well, it comes from a company by Mitre Red Light. Now Mitre Red Light are based in the States. They've been around for a few years now. In fact, their original series are the Mitre Red Mega. I think it was called Playsickin' at my 2019 body panel comparison. Since then they have released two new product ranges, the Mitre Mod, which is their mid-tier product range and this new Mitre Pro range, which is the top product range with a few bells and whistles. In that top range, this 1500 is the biggest panel that they sell. This particular unit has 300 LEDs. They have 5Y LEDs and it emits four different wavelengths. Now we'll come back to that soon. The Mitre Pro, the top range, has a few more bells and whistles. It allows modular capabilities, so you can attach two or three more panels to it. It has an inbuilt control panel and a timer, so it makes things nice and easy in terms of operation and knowing how long your treatment has gone from. It does have a refreshed design, which makes it nice and modern looking, I guess. Otherwise, cosmetically, there's nothing too extraordinary to report on. It's the internals that really matter here, the internals and the price. So it does have 5Y LEDs. Now the four wavelengths it emits are 630, 660, 830, and 850. Now this is better than your typical 660 and 850. And even better than that, Mitre Red have evenly split these wavelengths. 25% power is going to each of those wavelengths. Most companies that use multi-wave panels that have multiple wavelengths mainly have 5 or 10% of power going to some of these lesser known uncommon frequencies. So Mitre Red have bucked the trend there and have evenly split it. However, in my testing, and I remember all of this will be in my full video, in my testing I found that they don't actually, the Mitre Pro doesn't actually emit much power at 630. Instead it was 645 and 660. So there is a bit of a discrepancy there. Everything else that was good. From a power irradiance point of view, this panel did test really good. I have tested panels that have put out higher power, but it was still up there. We were looking around 40s, mid 40s, milliwatts per centimeter squared for red light, and mid 40 to high 40s in the near infrared light. So good numbers, but again I have seen higher. But still, they were solid. From a price point of view, this is where the Mitre Pro really shines. You can buy this unit for under $1,200. If you use discount code ALIX, it brings the price down to $1,092. Discount code ALIX will save you 5%. Shipping is free in America. You do pay a little bit if you are in Australia or the UK, around $100.  So it is justified I guess. From a value point of view, this panel is the best value I've tested so far out of 4 or 5 panels to date. It came out to be $8 per watt of power irradiance. Now if you're wondering what that means, head over to AlexWheels.com. I'll be doing a big buyer's guide over there explaining all this and comparing all these panels. And also be sure to check out my full review where I do go into this in a lot more data. But in a nutshell, it means that so far this is probably the best value panel on the market. Short maybe missing some of those more advanced controls and bells and whistles and technologies that other panels have. But from an all around point of view, it's really hard to beat. Has great EMF levels. It tested safe in all areas of EMF. And it also has a three-year warranty. Good support.  Like I said, it's really hard to beat. As for my quick likes and dislikes, well from a dislike point of view, like I see the international shipping is a little bit higher. It does miss out on 18 nanometer, which is a wavelength that I do like, especially for brain health. So that is a bit of a bummer. It doesn't incorporate that. It doesn't have some of those advanced features like inbuilt grips or touchscreen control panels. But given the price, I didn't think that's going to be a deal breaker. As for what I do like about this panel, well like I said, it's got exceptional power. It's got the best value metrics that I've tested in any panel today. And overall, it takes the boxes across the board. It looks good. It's easy to set up. It's easy to operate. It's got a good warranty. It's safe, low EMF levels. You've got a couple of wavelengths, not just your 660 and 850. You get a nice even spread. The hotspot testing I did on this panel was really good as well. So yeah, this is why I really do like this panel. And I think it's going to be a panel that's going to do well in my upcoming 2021 body panel comparison. So be sure to subscribe to see that video and be sure to check out my full review on this panel, which will be published anytime soon. Finally, if you do want to buy this panel, head over to mydoridlight.com and be sure to use Discount Credit, Alex. It will save you 5% and it will help me continue putting up content like this. If you have any questions, leave them below.