than the minimal wheat gravity conjecture that we discussed yesterday, and the second lecture will probably be mostly about applications to inflation and photon masses, but we'll see how I do on time. Okay, so to remind you yesterday we talked about the minimal version of the wheat gravity conjecture, which was that if I have a U1 gauge theory interacting with gravity, there should be some particle whose mass to charge ratio is smaller than that of large, extremal black holes. And one question that one of you already asked yesterday, which is a very good question, is what happens if you have a larger gauge group than just U1? And an answer to that question was given in a paper by Cliff Chang and Grant Ruhman about five years ago, and the argument that they gave is based on assuming that the interpretation of the wheat gravity conjecture should be that any extremal black hole should be able to shut its charge by decaying to lighter things. So we saw that if you only had a single U1 gauge field, this condition was required in order for an extremal black hole to be able to decay into two things, one of which would have a larger and one of which would have a smaller mass to charge ratio. It turns out that it's not quite so simple if I have more than one gauge group. So let's think about, for instance, the case of a U1 times U1. You might think that to satisfy the wheat gravity conjecture for a gauge group like this, I just need two charged particles, one of which obeys the bound for this U1 and one of which obeys the bound for that U1. But it turns out that's not really sufficient. And the reason is that the form of the extremality bound in this case, in the simplest case where these gauge fields are not mixing with each other, looks like this. So if I have a black hole that carries charges under both gauge groups, there's an extremality bound that depends on the square root of the sum of the squares of the charges under the individual gauge groups. And again, this is just because there are electric fields for each of these gauge groups outside the black hole, each of which are storing some energy. But now the claim is that if I just satisfy the wheat gravity conjecture for each U1 individually, I don't necessarily allow all the black holes to saturate this bound to discharge. OK, so that's easy to see. Suppose let's just look at one sort of toy example. Suppose I give you two charged particles, one of which has charged one under the first gauge group and has mass chosen to saturate the wheat gravity bound. And the second of which similarly has charged one under the second gauge group. So if I were just looking at each U1 individually, this would be enough. But the claim is that this is not enough if I have a black hole that carries both charges. And so we can see that. Suppose I have a black hole charged under both U1s, which is extremal. And we can just ask what would happen to that black hole if it emitted one of these particles? How would its mass change and how would its charge change? So suppose I can just emit this particle and lose mass M1. And similarly, its charge under the first gauge group will decrease by one. It might lose more mass depending on how much momentum this particle carries away, but this is the minimum amount of mass that it would lose. And then we can just work out what happens to the extremality bound after I do this. What do I get if I just evaluate this quantity? Is it positive or not? And so if I expand out the square and subtract everything, what you will find that this looks something like this, which is negative. So this decay is not kinematically possible because the black hole, by emitting this particle, would turn into another black hole that just isn't a good classical solution. It doesn't obey the extremality bound. And so adding these two particles is not sufficient how extremal black hole is to discharge. So this tells us that whatever the right condition is for a theory with more than one gauge group, it's going to be more complicated than just saying that you have to individually obey the bound for each gauge group independently. And it turns out that there's a simple geometric criterion to understand what is the correct condition to allow these black holes to discharge. And Schengen-Rehmann formulated this condition in this way. They said, consider the charge to mass ratio of a particle. So we're going to have a set of variables, let me call them Zij, which are given by the ratio of the charge of a particle in plonk units divided by the mass. And so the index i labels which charge we're talking about, which one of the gauge groups. And the index j labels which particle we're talking about. So for a given j, for a given particle, we can think of this, the collection of Z i's for that j as a vector in some space.  Its charge can't be too big for a given mass. So in the space of these perched to mass ratios, there's some region in which black holes can live. So this might be a space of many dimensions if we have many gauge groups. But there's some sort of ball inside this region that contains all of the black holes.  Extremal black holes would live on the boundary of this region, if we compute using the two derivative action. As I mentioned yesterday, if you have higher dimension operators, the black holes could move slightly outside or slightly inside this region. Unless there's some other physics like a BPS bound that follows from supersymmetry that could force them to live exactly on the boundary of the region. But what Chung and Rehman pointed out is that a condition that allows for all of the black holes to be able to shed their charge is to have some set of charged particles in the space.  So the convex hole meaning I connect up each of these particles and their antiparticles in such a way as to build a convex space.  So the example I gave you before where I just had two particles and we saw that not all black holes could discharge is an example where we had two U1s.  And I was choosing to have a particle here and here. They would also have antiparticles here and here.  And what we were seeing is that if I go in a general direction that doesn't point along one of the axes.  So there are these regions that are not contained and that means the weak gravity conjecture fails. On the other hand, if I had chosen those two particles to have smaller masses, sufficiently far away from the weak gravity bound in a single direction. Then the convex hole, it fully contained the black hole region and everything would be able to discharge. Or we could have a more complicated spectrum. We could have particles carrying both charges. Maybe I could have a picture of something like this. So the minimal version of the weak gravity conjecture doesn't tell you exactly what charges the particles have to have. It just says that whatever those charges are, the masses should be light enough that the convex hole contains the black hole region. So we saw yesterday that in fact there are examples like the Colutzicline theory that obey much stronger properties. If we look at Colutzicline theory, we would just find charged particles living on the boundary of this region in every direction. And there's a reason for that. It's because in this case the extremality bound coincides with the BPS bound. If you study theories that have scalars, you'll find that the black hole extremality bound can sometimes take a different form. So for one example, if I take a string theory and compactify it, I will have both U1s that correspond to Colutzicline charge or momentum around the circle. But also U1s that correspond to winding. How many times a string winds around the circle? And if you work out what black holes look like in that theory, you'll find that the formula I gave you before with the square root of sum of squares is not the right one. That works for the simple Reissner-Nordstrom case. But in this case you get a more interesting story where you have these linear regions, so you get kind of a diamond shape. But again the convex hole condition is the right criterion to impose to ask that everything into K. And in this case again, because these are BPS charges, you find that you just have actual states carrying all of these charges in all directions along the boundary. So in everything that I'm telling you, what I'm going to take is my definition of the wheat gravity conjecture for a general gauge group is going to be this condition that we have particles carrying charges under the gauge group such that their convex hole contains all possible black holes and allows extremal black holes to discharge. There's another way to formulate the wheat gravity conjecture in theories that have scalars that I want to mention to contrast it with this. So Aaron Palti defined something that he called the wheat gravity conjecture with scalar fields, which is that a particle should exist that obeys disinquality. The electromagnetic force should be bigger than the gravitational force coming from the mass plus the scalar force that depends on how the mass changes if I vary the value of the scalar field. And this is a version of what I would call the repulsive force conjecture. So the statement is that the repulsion of electromagnetism should overcome the combined attraction of gravity in scalars. And this is well defined for a single U1, but again it's not so obvious how to define this if you have more than one gauge group. There's no clear definition of this in the case of more than one gauge group. There's work in progress that I'm doing with Ben Heidenreich and Tom Rudelius, where we're trying to work that out. And the interesting thing is that it seems like this alternative conjecture and this conjecture might both be true. But if the particles' masses depend on the scalar in a different way than the masses of black holes depend on the scalar, these are two different statements. Another question you might ask is what happens for non-abelian gauge groups? And we sort of mentioned this yesterday when I showed you the example of charged states in the Adoratic String Theory. We can take the Qs to be charges under the Cartan generators of the Lie algebra. So the maximal torus, the U1s that are contained inside the gauge group. And then we can still apply this condition. But because the gluons themselves are charged in massless, they're infinitely far out in the space. And so this becomes sort of a trivial condition for a non-abelian gauge theory to satisfy. Right, so what I'm saying is that I would apply this to any gauge group. But what I mean by charge in the non-abelian case was not necessarily obvious. So what I mean by it is take the U1s that live inside the non-abelian gauge group and make this the charge under those. But yeah, I would require this condition of any gauge group. And we'll see that that becomes more interesting when I talk about a different version of the wheat gravity conjecture in a few minutes. But yeah, one way to see that there should be something related to non-abelian gauge groups is if I give you a non-abelian gauge theory, you can compactify that theory on a circle and turn on a Wilson line for the gauge group around the circle and break it down to the U1s that live inside the non-abelian gauge group. And so if the wheat gravity conjecture applies in that lower dimensional theory, it should tell you that something had to apply in the higher dimensional theory you started with. So so far, these are all kind of minimal versions of the wheat gravity conjecture. This is kind of the right minimal version of the conjecture in the case of a gauge group that's more complicated than U1. But as we were discussing yesterday, the minimal conjectures are maybe not as useful as we would like because they could be satisfied just by saying that black holes get small corrections that push them out of the black hole region defined by the extremality bound on asymptotically big black holes. So what I want to talk about for the rest of this lecture are some extensions of this idea that are much more powerful and which are motivated by the examples that I told you yesterday. So we talked about Kuhl-Sekline theory and we talked about the heterotic string and we saw that in both cases we had not just a single charged particle that obeyed the wheat gravity conjecture, we had an infinite family of charged particles of different charges, all of which obeyed the conjecture. And this is closely related to another idea which is called the swampland distance conjecture which came from Aguri and Vapa 2006. And so they had some set of conjectures, all of which were related to the fact that known theories of quantum gravity have moduli spaces, so spaces of scalar fields with flat potentials that are protected by supersymmetry. But in fact similar statements apply even away from the Susie context. Although it becomes harder to make these statements sharp, we saw in Kuhl-Sekline theory that we had this radion mode that controlled the size of the circle. Even in a non-super symmetric theory that field can be very light compared to the UV cutoff. But for now let's talk as if the moduli space exists and the scalars are massless because it's easier to formulate everything in that context. So their first conjecture about moduli spaces is that if I give you a moduli space, there exist points that are infinitely far away. So given a point in the moduli space and some positive number, you can find some other point in the moduli space whose distance is bigger than that number. So moduli spaces allow you to go infinitely far away. And the distance is defined by the scalar field kinetic terms. So there's some metric gij of phi e phi j. I guess I didn't say it before but it's the same metric that appeared in Paul T's statement of his weak gravity conjecture with scalar fields when you compute the attractive force on charged objects due to scalars. You need to know the metric on that space. Now the next statement that a gradient of alpha made is where things really become interesting and make a connection to the weak gravity conjecture. I say that if I go far away some distance t away from the point where I started, I will find an infinite tower of light particles whose masses are exponentially small. Masses of order e to the minus alpha t for some parameter alpha which is bigger than zero. And it's been further noted, for instance by Claver and Paul T, that this number alpha in known examples is always order one in plonk units. So what does this mean? This means that in quantum gravity, first there are these big moduli spaces. There are parameters that you can, there's scalar fields that let you vary the parameters of the theory and you can vary them by arbitrarily large amounts. But whenever you try to vary them too much, you find that your effective field theory starts to break down because lots of particles are starting to become light. And so if you don't incorporate those particles in your theory, you don't have a good understanding of the physics anymore. So effective field theories seem to break down for super plonky and field values. And we saw an example yesterday in Kulitsa Klein theory where we had a scalar with a kinetic term that loosely looked like in plonk squared d log phi, d log phi, where the masses of the KK modes went like 1 over phi. So the kinetic term tells us that if we vary this number phi by an order one amount, that we're going an order in plonk distance in the field space. And if I write this mass in terms of the canonically normalized field or the field that's actually measuring that distance, we see that the mass is decreasing exponentially. So that's an example. Similarly for the heterotic string, we saw that our masses roughly went like n divided by the square root of alpha prime or n times the string mass scale, but that's exponentially small in the distance reversed by the dilaton. So alpha prime in plonk units depends on g string, which is exponential in the value of the dilaton. So these examples that we saw yesterday are illustrations that kind of capture all of the features that Aguri and Vafa say are general features of modulized spaces in theories of quantum gravity, right, alpha as well, yeah, independent of distance, right. So the claim should be taken to be an asymptotic claim about large t. So the claim is at large t, there's some number alpha for which the masses are decreasing like e to the minus alpha t. It won't be exactly this, there will be corrections, but if we go to large enough t, then it'll be this where alpha is just some constant, okay. And there are many more examples in string theory. So for example, let's say I build a three plus one dimensional gauge theory and type 2b strings with the seven brains wrapped on four cycles. So something that might be phenomenologically relevant if you're trying to construct something like the standard model within string theory, then your gauge coupling one over g squared will go like the volume of these four dimensional cycles and those volumes can be parameterized by some scalar fields, some scalar moduli. And again, if I go a long distance in field space, if I go to very small coupling g, I'm making this volume big and I'm bringing down some coulisacline modes. Not as simple as these coulisacline modes that live on a circle, but still some set of modes are becoming light as I make the volume big. So that's the Swampland distance conjecture. And it's already a very interesting conjecture from the viewpoint of thinking about things like theories of inflation where you might want fields to travel long distances over time as inflation is happening. One distinction I should point out in that context is the distance that appears here is the geodesic distance in field space that depends only on the kinetic terms, right? So I have some space of scalar fields. I know a metric on that space. I give you two points and ask you to measure the distance. You do it in the usual geometric way just using the metric. But if I have fields that are actually evolving in time and we're not in this supersymmetric limit where I have a perfectly flat modular space, then the fields might not actually be following geodesics in field space because there could be a potential and the potential could change how the fields are evolving. And this might be an important distinction if we're trying to apply this to realistic theories of the real world that have Susie breaking, where the potential can be very important for figuring out what the fields are doing. And so let me just mention two papers that discuss the swampland distance conjecture in this context and how this distinction might be important. One of these papers is by Hebecker and collaborators. Another is by Landete and Chu. And there's been various other recent work along these lines. So it's not completely straightforward to say that just because Agoury and Vaffa tell us that if you go along geodesic distance in field space, you'll bring down a tower of modes that inflationary theories with long field ranges are excluded. You have to be a little bit careful in trying to make these kinds of arguments because these statements are really statements about the limit of exact moduli spaces, which is not the limit that's useful for the real world. So what I want to do now is circle back to the weak gravity conjecture. So you'll notice this conjecture made no reference to gauge fields. We were just talking about theories of quantum gravity that contain scalar fields that act as moduli. But in string theory or collude secline theory, as we've seen in examples, the values of gauge couplings are determined by the values of moduli. They're not just fixed parameters that you can't change. They depend on the values of some scalar fields. And so this starts to bring us to a link between these ideas in the weak gravity conjecture. The weak gravity conjecture grew out of the statement of no global symmetries, which was a statement that quantum gravity doesn't want you to have exact global symmetries. And therefore, if I have a gauge coupling and I try to make it very, very, very small, something bad should happen. The theory should somehow break down. Well, in a lot of context, what happens when you try to make a gauge coupling very small is precisely that you're taking a long distance limit in moduli space. The small gauge coupling corresponds to a very big value of some scalar field. Just as happened here includes a client theory, the gauge coupling was set by the value of phi. And so if you want to make a small gauge coupling, you have to go a long distance in field space. And then what Agoury involved to tell us is that some tower of modes should start to become light. And you should worry that you're going to lose control of your field theory because you don't know about all of these modes that are coming down from the UV cutoff and entering the energy scales that you would like to calculate in. Okay, so given these ideas together with the wheat gravity conjecture that I discussed before, it's tempting to conjecture something that's a little sharper than the wheat gravity conjecture, which is that in the case where I try to send a gauge coupling to zero, a tower of modes is going to become light. And so in some cases that tower of modes, as we've seen, is exactly the same tower of modes that the degree involved to tell us will become light. Okay, so just sort of trying to put these pieces together, it's tempting to guess that if I have a complete theory of gravity coupled to a gauge field with a very small gauge coupling, there must exist infinite tower of modes of different charge q, each one of which obeys something like the wheat gravity conjecture, the mass is less than its charge in plonk units. So I'm not claiming that the statement follows from other statements that I've made. I'm just saying that given the examples that we have and given the other statements, it's tempting to guess that this is a general phenomenon. And so the statement in the sort of loose form that I've written it as here is something we might call a tower wheat gravity conjecture. And that particular name was used in a paper by Andriolo Junghan's shoe last year. We could guess something even sharper than this. And the statement that's true in all examples that I'm aware of is we call a sublattice, wheat gravity conjecture. And this statement is, so there's some lattice of charges of gauge, charges under the gauge group that is allowed. And the suggestion is there's a sublattice of the full charge lattice and of the same dimension. So it's not like you could have a five dimensional charge lattice and I'm picking a lattice that only goes in one of the directions. It's got to be the full dimensionality for which every site in the sublattice contains at least one super extremal. So that's along the lines of the tower conjecture, but it's a little bit sharper. It's saying that these can't just have any random set of charges. There should at least be some sublattice. So maybe it's all multiples of charge two. Maybe it's all multiples of charge three. But there's some sublattice for which you can find an example of a particle obeying the wheat gravity conjecture for every site in the sublattice. Okay, so this conjecture was formulated by Ben Haydn-Rike, Tom Ridilius, and myself. Actually, we first wrote a paper. I seem to be missing the exact archive number, but we wrote a paper in 2015 where we guessed that this was true for the full charge lattice. We didn't have the sublattice part. It turned out there was a counter example, which I can briefly mention. And so we refined this to the sublattice statement in a paper in 2016. And there was a simultaneous paper by Miguel Montero, Gary Shue, and Pablo Soler with the same formulation. And we were led to guess this, not by the logic that I was giving you here that started from thinking about the swampland distance conjecture and examples. But rather just by thinking about the wheat gravity conjecture itself and trying to sort of stress test it and see if it was consistent. And the claim that we made in the 2015 paper is that there's sort of a flaw in the convex hull condition, the minimal version of the wheat gravity conjecture, which is that I could give you a theory that satisfies it and you could compactify that theory on a circle and get a new theory that doesn't satisfy it anymore. And the reason is the gauge group gets bigger. So in my compactified theory, I now have the collude decline charge along the circle. And as we saw, the convex hull condition tells us that when you have a bigger gauge group, it's harder to satisfy the conjecture than when you have a smaller one. You need to pull the charges farther away in order for the convex hull to enclose the black hole region.  So there's going to be a mode with charge 1 comma 1. There's going to be a mode with charge 1 comma 2.  And so they will have some convex hull.  And as I've drawn it, this example looks fine. But what you find is as you vary the radius of the compactification, there will always be some radii for which collude decline modes fail to fully enclose the black hole region and the weak gravity conjecture can fail. So the claim is that the minimal weak gravity conjecture, the original version of it, generalized to multiple gauge groups in the natural way, as Chung and Rehmann did, is not a completely satisfying conjecture because it's somehow not sufficient. If I give you a theory that obeys it, you can change that theory only in the infrared by compactifying. And get a theory that doesn't obey it anymore. So we noticed this in 2015 and then we went looking for examples in string theory so we could just understand how is the weak gravity conjecture satisfied in actual theories of quantum gravity? And what we found was that in all the examples that we could check, there were these towers of particles. And the towers of particles rescued the statement because now we have many different particles of different charges. And so they have collude decline modes in different locations. And when you start putting them all together, you always find that after you compactify, the theory still obeys the conjecture. So the claim is that these tower statements are more robust under compactification than the original conjecture. So that's one reason to think that these might be plausible statements. And another reason to think they're plausible, again, is they connect nicely to these distance conjecture ideas of Agourian Bafa. And the final reason, and this was really the main technical development in the 2016 paper that we wrote and that Montero and collaborators wrote, is that in perturbative string theory, we can actually just prove that the statement is true. And in fact, it follows from modular invariance. So it's possible to show just by studying a modular invariant partition function that has a chemical potential turned on, that charge states exist within a sub lattice and they obey a bound that looks like the weak gravity conjecture bound. Okay, so at least in perturbative string theory, this is a well-established fact. Of course, perturbative string theory is not all of quantum gravity and you can ask what about particles that are charged under gauge fields that live on D-brains, for instance. And we can't really say anything about that. Although there have been some recent interesting papers showing that a class of F theory compactifications also contain states that obey the sub lattice weak gravity conjecture. These papers are by Lee, Lisch, and Bygant. So we have a lot of examples where this is just a known fact about about actual theories of quantum gravity that you can construct. Let's see, so just have a few minutes left. Let me not go into detail, but just tell you the reason why it has to be a sub lattice instead of a full lattice is you can just construct counter examples where it's not the full lattice and the flavor of these counter examples is that you start with something that has multiple charges, like compactify on a torus, and then take an orbit fold where one of the directions gets the gauge field projected out. So you no longer have a gauge field corresponding to some of the charges, but states are still labeled by some kind of momentum in that direction. It's not really conserved, but a state that had charge in that direction before you orbit fold it will still have a bigger mass because of that extra momentum. And so what you can do is cook up a theory in which, for certain sites in your charge lattice, the lightest state that is not projected out by the orbit fold is a state that had momentum in that extra direction, and that adds to its mass but doesn't add to its charge because we removed the charge associated with that direction. That's the flavor, you can find the details in the papers. But the interesting thing is that in the examples that we know, where you can check what states obey the weak gravity conjecture, it's never a very sparse sub lattice, so it's maybe at most half the sites in the charge lattice fail to obey the conjecture. It's never like every 10th site or every 17th site. And whether that's just an artifact of looking at examples that we know how to construct, or whether it's a deeper statement, I'm not really sure. To the extent that it seems to be true that this applies to sub lattices that are not very sparse, this avoids the problem with the original weak gravity conjecture that you could obey it just with black holes. So the original conjecture, I said you could have a small correction to an extremal black hole, and that obeyed the conjecture. But that extremal black hole has an enormous charge in order to be in the regime in which we trust semi-classical gravity. Whereas if we require this to be true for sub lattices whose sparseness is only sort of an order one number, then we're going to find states of small charge that obey the conjecture, and those states are going to be lighter than the Planck scale. And so this is now telling us about actual particles, not just about black holes. So again, I don't have a proof that there are no examples where this is satisfied with the sparse sub lattice, even in the perturbative string context, but we've looked at lots of different examples of heterotic string orbifolds that we understand, and in those examples it never was. Okay, I guess that's all for this lecture.


Hello everybody and thank you so much for joining me today. My name is Cody Byer, I'm Program Manager on the Visual Studio for Mac team here at Microsoft. Today, I'm going to share the improvements that we've made to IntelliSense within Visual Studio for Mac using the new editor that came out in 8.1. So to get started, we're going to look at the project we have here, and I noticed that I have one builder. That's too bad, but let's see what that error is. By double-clicking here, I'm taken to this mock items list, and I see that I missed the definition for people. So I'm going to go into my items.cs. So now when I'm within items.cs, I know that I need to create a list, and the list needs to contain persons. So I'm going to move my carrot into the class, type in public, and I see that I don't have a list within my completion window. Now, I don't necessarily remember the full import for this, if it's system.generic. I can't remember. So what I'm going to do is enable a new feature in VS for Mac called Show Import Items. To do this, I'm going to open up the preferences and navigate to the IntelliSense section under Text Editor. By clicking on Show Import Items, I now have the ability to see the different namespaces that are available to me within .NET. So let's go back and type in list again. So now you can see that I have a full completion window of all the different libraries that I can call in, including system.collection.generic. So by clicking here, I have the import of system.collection.generic here, and I can create the list that I need. Perfect. I now have the list of persons available, and I can build my project. But there are a few other features you may have noticed while I was typing in my list. All right. So that build succeeded and another bug squashed. But let's take a step back and see some of the other features that we had available to us in Visual Studio for Mac using our new IntelliSense engine. I'm going to delete what I added, and I'm going to call the completion list up again. So again, type in public list, and here you can see that we now have some buttons down here that are new to Visual Studio for Mac. These allow you to filter the completion window by type. So for example, if you only want to see classes, you can click on classes, and this limits the completion list to only including types of classes. Furthermore, you can do this by enums, you can do this by delegates, or any other type filtering that you may need. Furthermore, this is possible by using keyboard shortcuts as well. So if I'm typing in list and I only want to see classes, I can say option C and limit this to only classes. When you combine the ability to filter your IntelliSense list with the ability to include all the different types of imports available to you, you have a much more powerful approach to using IntelliSense in Visual Studio for Mac. In addition to these features, we also have much improved performance within the IntelliSense engine of Visual Studio for Mac. This means that not only can you have more powerful features, but also your completion list will populate quickly, and your completion list will appear immediately. Today, we learned about the improvements in IntelliSense within Visual Studio 2019 for Mac. This included better performance in addition to new features such as type filtering and showing import items. To learn more, please visit our documentation site at aka.ms.vsmacdocs, or stay tuned for the next video in our series. Thank you.


Welcome to Access to Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success, profitability, and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge, master your process, and own your future. Hey guys, good to be here, everybody. Welcome to another edition of theaxisotrader.com. Nightly wrap up show. Hope everybody is doing well. If you are bringing you to the channel, please like, subscribe, share, tell a friend. Again, we try to every single night, well, Monday through Wednesday, and then on weekends, try to give you the best possible outcome from technical analysis via an unbiased point of view. And that's kind of what leads us here. Last night, obviously, we talked about several things. I liked what the Nasdaq names did yesterday. They kind of detached themselves yesterday from all the banks selling. And we had three big days, so four big days of really aggressive bank selling. The one thing that I really do like, I don't think any of us can give. It's very tough for any of us to kind of give the government or any government agency any type of credit. But I will tell you, man, I was thinking about it. I think that for once, and correct me from wrong, I think for once that the government, right, they did a pretty good job. Of putting out a major, major fire. Again, we don't know if this one fires in the spread yet. But I give them a lot of credit. They came out right away, SIVB, one day later, MDIC takes control. The day after that, they start spinning it off to the highest bidder. They didn't lead it, you know, they didn't lack all these other stocks, SBNY, right? They didn't let these things just drift for weeks and weeks and weeks and taking the market down with it. They really nipped it in the bud.   And we also talked about a very big number here in last night's video. And I think Kyler even made a YouTube short about this kind of as a reminder how big that 9440s levels were. And we talked about it last night in the video. And the question going into today's day was, well, can the tech stocks once again detach themselves from everything else? And before we even got that number, we had the CPI come in this morning. 6% was the consensus, came in at 6%. So a lot of people believed that the move, the next possible was already baked in. And, you know, markets started moving higher to the bulls credit, especially the technology bulls. They did reclaim this 29440s level and trade right into supply, next supply. I thought it was going to be 29750s. It actually overshot a little bit, traded up to 298. And we'll get to individual pivots in a second. So it was a very, very good productive day in the bulls. And not only were bulls resilient, a lot of bullish looking charts really woke up, right?  Look at meta, right? Look at meta. Again, we'll get to the pivots in a second. This thing is a stone throws away from earnings highs. Look at Microsoft, right? Microsoft had a huge move today, right? We talked about Microsoft last night in the video. Huge move today out of this whole base here, right? Even Tesla woke up, right? We talked about Tesla put in a hammer yesterday off the 50 day. Even Tesla woke up and reclaimed this, you know, this supplies on a daily chart. And now it's close to attacking the 50 day moving average. Look at AMD, right? AMD is very, very close as well to putting, you know, to kind of challenging these earnings high.  And again, this is kind of what we talked about on the weekend video about, you know, people who, you know, people who just would never, were not around 2007, 2008, talking about Armageddon, talking about destruction of prices. We're still here. And not only are you still here, three days later, we're talking about AMD, Meta, and NVIDIA, right? And NVIDIA possibly taking out their 2023 highs. So again, it's a great story, right? It's a really, really great story. You know, people, I don't think these were great. It was a horrific story, right? About the banks' potential failures, potential, you know, three banks failed in a week, you know, more dominoes to come. But it's a better story, the resilience of the bulls. And that's the bottom line. Again, if you go through your history books, you could see it. Even when it started in the 1980s and the savings and loans crisis, right? This is a better, this is definitely a better comparison to the SNL prices in the 80s than the 2007, 2008 crisis that we saw.  And again, yes, I'm a firm believer in trading both sides of the market. I am the champion of projecting independence to every trader that you can have it all by absorbing both sides of the market, appreciating both sides of the market and taking advantage of both sides of the market. But I will tell you, nothing feels good. Like a raw stamp, angry, vicious, violent bull stampede. And that's exactly what we got today. And it was a pretty cool day. And I think a lot of us are very, very happy. Again, I have no problem trading a bear market. Again, I trade both sides of the market. It's just a good bull market. It just feels, it hits a little bit different. That's exactly what it's thinking. Also, what I like seeing was all these regional banks like SNV, for example, like the CEO Schwab. They got in front of a potential catastrophe. For example, the Schwab CEO came out today and said, hey, everything is going good. 80% of all our deposits are above the FDIC threshold. So, excuse me, below the FDIC threshold, they said that they're getting about $2 billion worth of deposit inflows a day. That's a good thing. That's exactly what the market here wanted to hear today. You had that really aggressive dead cat bounce at the open with FRC was up about 50% at one point. WAL, this thing had a big move up. Even Schwab, when the CEO bought those 50,000 shares. What was cool about what we saw today, at one point, all these stocks reversed. At one point, because around the afternoon, they reversed, and you could see here, the WAL went literally from 41 all the way to 23, and it rebounded, put up an $11 move into the close. If you're a bull, you kind of like what you want to see here.  Why isn't the market not crashing? Because again, that's the whole point. The sky is not falling. If you were only eight, nine, ten years old doing 2000, 2008, you don't have to say so how this market is compared to that market because you were still sucking on your mommy's teat. I said it, but no offense, but it is what it is. But going into tomorrow's session, now that we have the CPI out of the way, by the way, and I say sucking on your mommy's teat, I say that in the nicest possible way possible. But going into tomorrow, again, I don't think the story of the banks is written yet. I don't think we're in the final chapter. Is it possible another bank comes out and has some news? Absolutely. I don't believe this is the end. This is the season finale of the 2023 four-day bank crisis. We'll never forget. But the most important part is if there is another shoe drop, the most important part is kind of what the Bulls did in the last couple of days, especially in the technology sector. Can they embrace the bad news? Can they shove it along and continue on the merry way? And if that's the case, you definitely have to feel that the narrative back to the buy side will start coming back very, very soon. But again, it's still very, very early in the saga. We'll see how the market plays out, especially for tomorrow. And the key is, again, always be prepared on both sides of the market.  And again, if you were watching the video, pretty good, right? Pretty good. Obviously you had this 294, 40s level got rejected twice. For going into tomorrow, the Bulls really need to close and start building above 298. If they can start reclaiming above 298, then that channel that we started building upon that ended around February, excuse me, March the 3rd, March the 4th, it will reclaim this whole channel here. It'll start the move. So if we can get it closed tomorrow above 298, 299 on the queues, I do believe it'll start a cycle. And I think the cycle will get the 301. And if it gets above 301, then I think we could test those 304 highs that we had on March the 6th. So we'll see. So let's talk about some of the pivots today. Very, very aggressive. As you can imagine, anytime you see all the horsemen, all the beta stocks on the pivot watch, you know there's an opportunity that they confirm is going to be a premium session. So let's talk about it. So QQQs, we already talked about 294. 40s rejected twice back to back days needs to build. They went to almost 298. That's where the next channel, big base needs to be built. Tesla, wake up, baby. We finally woke up a little bit. Say let's see if we get a follow through tomorrow. 178. 30s needs to build. The 79. 50 is the pre-market high for the initial push to 180. 130. That was exactly what happened here perfectly on the 60-minute move. So it took out the 70. It took out the 78. 30s took out the pre-market highs of 79s and traded right to the 81. 30s. And then obviously it remouted that and started putting in new highs. Listen, if Tesla gets going, I mean we could see, we could see a push into the 85. 87 level if today's channel confirms tomorrow. On the video monster move, 235. 50 is the pre-market highs. And 236. 30 was the March 10th highs. They both need to confirm. The video went absolutely nuts today and so did AMD. So here was the video. It took out the 35. 50. That was the pre-market highs. Took out the 36. 30s and traded all the way up to 242. I still like this thing for tomorrow if it starts reclaiming taste. Chattel's huge move there. Amazon nice move into supply. 9402 reject. Yesterday needs to build. Amazon went right into the 60-minute supply of right here. Right into the 95s. But again, I think if this thing starts confirming, especially the 50-day moving average, see this 50-day moving average? Any close on Amazon above like 95.5, 96, this thing's going to start spreading a little bit as well. Like Apple didn't do anything. 5314 needs to build. 5340 and then kind of died out. Microsoft was huge. 258 needs to build. Here is Microsoft. Right. So it took out the 258 level. It was the previous channel. It took out the 262 area. Traded all the way up to 261. This thing starts building above today's channels. Again, look at which room you have up. From Microsoft, Netflix never got there. Meadow went out of its mind. Meadow announced pre-market. We're having their second round of cost cuts layoffs. Unfortunately, 10,000 people are going to lose their jobs. 8380, 84 needs to build. And as you can imagine, Meadow went absolutely not situated all the way up to 94. And guys, look how close Meadow is to its earnings highs. If this thing starts confirming its earnings highs, man, you can see a really, really big boost. Again, we saw some weekly and next week's $200 calls come in. So a lot of bullish bets finally coming back into the market. But more important is the market, especially the bulls. The speculation money represented bulls that especially in the technology sector are finally waking up and negating the bad news from the banks. It's such a big deal when the technology stocks trade in their own two feet. Because if everything gets pulled down, that means there's a sell first, right? Shoot first, ask questions later. But when the technology stocks are strong and then everything else is strong, it's usually a really good outcome in the end. So guys, have a great night, everybody. God bless. I will see you all tomorrow. Take care.


Hello you guys and welcome back to Esoteric Atlanta. Of course, my name is Bryce. Before we get into the material at hand, I just once again want to shout out my sponsors Aseah. I have been doing Aseah now for a little over what two weeks and I have felt such a huge difference in my health and my energy. It's really made a very positive impact on my life and if you're interested in purchasing Aseah, please contact Jay from Spiritually Raw and he can help you figure out what products you need and explain to you more about the medical side of Aseah. Before we go any further, I again also would like to take a moment to thank all of my patrons and my producers. Without you guys, this channel simply would not exist. You guys have been the sole provider for me going forward with my research and with this content on this channel and so I thank you guys all from the bottom of my heart. If you would like to join our Patreon community, there is a link down in the description box below. And with that being said too, we had some questions last week pertaining to this material that I'm working off of. This again is the Hathor material. It is translated and channeled by Tom Kenyon. This is the second of Tom Kenyon's books that we've been through. The Magdalen manuscript was the first and we will be going through next the Octurian anthology. That's the next Tom Kenyon book we're going to be going through and we're in the Addendum section which again is my favorite because it's kind of like the history. It's like, you know, the drama and the juicy, juicy D of it all. So we're starting today on page 216 with inter-technology versus outer technology and this all of these parts to the Hathor material can be found in the playlist called Understanding the Magdalen. So if you are new to all of this stuff, I highly, highly, highly recommend first of all getting these books for yourself so that you have your own reference material. You can read them yourself and then second of all, just going back to the playlist and just re-listening to everything and then obviously create your own opinions based around what you are hearing from these books. All right. So let's go ahead and get started. Page 216, Inter-technology versus Outer-technology. Ideally, the use of inter-technology and outer-technology is in balance. There's a fascination by humans today with gadgets and external technology. Many believing that external technology will deliver them into higher consciousness without any work required. This is a fallacy of course. So med-beds, we've been telling you guys there is no magic med-bed that's coming that you're going to be able to lie in and then all of a sudden everything's going to be fixed. That's not how this works. Again, believing something like a med-bed is just going to come in and fix all your problems is looking for an external source to save you. And if you are still relying on an external source or a person, a thing, an organization, to swoop in and save you, then, darling, you're nowhere near ascension. From my understanding with the med-beds is they will only work as much as you've worked. So they're only going to help you lose the weight that you've actually held within you. So if you have done, let's say you're overweight and you've done zero work on yourself to figure out why you're addicted to food, the med-bed's not going to work. But if you've done the work, if you've done the therapy, if you've done the shadow work, if you're starting to exercise, change your eating, then maybe the med-bed will work. So I think that's really, really a great analogy for inner technology versus outer technology. Your inner technology, your inner understanding has to work before any type of external gadget will work for you. I hope that makes sense. It's just like people who are sitting around just waiting for the revaluation to happen. Stop waiting. Do what you got to do now. You're just waiting for death at this point.  You are plot twist.  All right. The rods of power we discussed earlier were simply an assist to the initiates of ancient Egypt. Exactly. So yes, way in the beginning of this book, they talk about the rods of power. All right. Exactly. This is an assist. It's like the asia that I'm doing now, which helps your cells regenerate. It's just an assist to allow the body to do what the body wants to do. It does not replace my exercise, my journaling, my meditation, eating healthy. It does not replace any of that. It assists it. Okay. The actual movement of the vital force of the spine was created by the initiates inner intention focus and will. The rods simply coaxed subtle energy into a movement intended by the initiates. Personal mastery is not easy at any time. No spirituality is easy. If you're coming into a spiritual practice to find ease, you're going to be real surprised. You have to go through the darkness. You have to go as Magdalene says in her gospel, you have to descend.  You have to like go into that until you can come out the other side, until you can ascend. You can't ascend if you've never descended. Of the general population of ancient Egypt, less than 1% would have dedicated themselves to becoming initiates. There were those who took the outer roles of priests and priestesses, but those who truly chose to be initiates and take the path of soul accomplishment to the highest realms were in the minority, less than 1% of the population. I can absolutely believe that even just in the yoga world.  The real yoga, so many people would rather take the easy road and like go to a teacher training and pay like thousands of dollars when that's not even legitimate. You have to go to India and go to a shala in India to be legitimate.  They'd rather take the easy road. That means nothing. That just feeds into the ego of those initiates less than 10% achieved the highest levels of understanding the mystery schools were teaching and of the remaining 10% less than 10% of them achieved full and total self mastery. This does not mean that the other initiates failed because mastery is something that extends through all lifetimes. Yes, we see that the Sophia code every lifetime builds on itself. The idea that you have failed if you don't make it to full self mastery in this lifetime is to us a preposterous belief. As we view it, your current life is simply one embodiment in time and space and one expression of your coup your soul. Indeed, every subsequent lifetime is another expression of your soul. It is like growing petals on the flower when the pedals have been strengthened and are matured sufficiently, then the blossoms open and reach the final attainment, which is what the lotus flower is for yoga, going through the muck and blooming. The process of arriving to the full blossoming of self mastery is in true part of the journey. So we are uncomfortable with saying that over 90% of initiates in ancient Egypt failed because in our understanding they were reaching for mastery. It is simply in the timing of things that during one embodiment they did not reach the final attainment to which the mystery schools were leading them. In subsequent lifetimes, however, many of them did finally reach self mastery, and that's something Guruji used to say, especially for those of us Westerners who actually ended up in India, like did it, just got on a plane and went to India and left everything behind. He would say that it was obvious that we had done this in the past. We were coming to finish what we had started. Our soul was called to finish what we had actually started. Understanding the use of energetic implants to assist ascension. If you receive something that is not harmonically suited to be a part of you, it is not only superfluous, it is also potentially dangerous. You have within your being everything that is needed to ascend the spiral into the highest elevated states of consciousness. They are all within you in seed form, y'all like how many different types of spiritual paths have to tell you that like you're it.  You have everything in you that you need and that is your power move. That's good news. There is nothing that needs to be added from outside. All that needs to be done is to cultivate the soil of your being so that the seeds can emerge and give fruit. This is done through love, compassion and discernment reason regarding the human voice. Within the sounds of your own voice are the keys to innumerable worlds. Sound Signatures A sound signature is similar to a signature on paper. When you sign a check at your bank, the signature must be nearly identical to your original signature on file. If it's a match, you are giving access to the account. It's the same with sound signatures. All emotions, thought forms, beliefs and energies have a sound pattern that may contain one or more frequencies of vibration. These vibrations or sound patterns are expressed by an individual or sometimes mechanically so that the sound signature matches the fundamental signature you get at residence and in that emotion our thought form emerges into consciousness. For instance, the emotion of sadness has a sound signature that most humans would recognize as crying. The act of crying or the sound of weeping is recognized universally as the sound signature for sadness, grief or loss. But if you suppress sadness instead of experiencing it in a moment, the vibration energetically quills up inside your energy field waiting in dormancy for an opportunity to express itself. At the first opportunity, the sadness suddenly uncoils, spirals out and you find yourself crying. As the energetics on this plane increase, more emotions will be triggered in yourself and others and often you will not know where they come from or what has triggered them. Often times you may not know what to do with them. Our suggestion is this, if a strong emotion arises, find an appropriate space and make the sound of the emotion. Let it move through you. If you feel like crying, cry. If you feel like yelling, yell. And this is definitely something that we have spoken about a lot especially with the shadow work challenge and on Aquarius Rising Africa. This is why I tell you guys like to do kickboxing if you're angry, find a way to express these emotions and if you've got to go sit in your car and scream into a pillow, you do that. If you've got to cry, you've got to close the door and just take some moments to yourself to cry. Cry. It's okay. You have to let the energy out. If you don't, it's just going to stay in the system and it's going to end up transmuting it to self and it's something else that ends up hurting yourself or someone else down the road. As the energetics on your planet increase, more emotions will be triggered in yourself and others and often you will not know where they come from or what has triggered them. Often times you may not know what to do with them. Again, that's what we are focused on in the shadow work challenge. That's why I'm having you do so many different forms of exercise because exercise is not just a way of weight loss or to punish yourself into getting into a size of zero genes. It's a way to transmute energy. That's why we have the kickboxing and the bar and the yoga and the different forms of movement so that you have an understanding of what that's doing within the energy of your body so you know how to transmute and process different feelings that come up. When a strong emotion arises, remember that there is a vocal sound with it. If you can make the sound of the emotion, let yourself feel whatever it is. Even if you don't know what it is, you will have helped yourself in the process of vocally expressing a strong emotion. You will often begin to have an understanding of what that emotion is about. Which again is why journaling is so important when you're doing these exercises, when you're doing, you're letting yourself cry, when you're doing the kickboxing, when you're doing all of this journaling with yourself, nobody else is reading it and giving you a base understanding of where everything comes from. You're pulling it out of yourself, right? No one's telling you where it's coming from. You're the one figuring it out for yourself. For those fearful of making sounds, if you feel that you are unable to make sounds around others, then we suggest you go off somewhere alone. Many people are alone in their cars when they drive, and this is a great place to make sounds. You can also make sounds outside of nature in a room where no one else is around. Embarrassment about making sounds is fundamentally an emotional issue. It's an energetic block because the flow of creative energy in the throat chakra wants to be expressed. If you are holding back from making sound or from speaking out of embarrassment, it is probably due to an earlier emotional experience of being repressed or made wrong for expressing yourself. It may be a whole pattern of holding back your truth and your energy. This type of emotional block needs to be resolved because if you are unwilling to make sound using your vocal cords, then you are choosing to constrain your energy. This is a wide topic, and in practice, things would be tailored to the individual rather than giving broad sweeping information. However, we'll employ a broad sweep and an attention to address the subject. As we said earlier, the vitality of your planet is decreasing due to the loss of minerals and the decrease of oxygen levels. What you can do at a biological level is to increase your levels of minerals and oxygen. This increase will help many conditions that are now being experienced. Colloidal minerals can be very helpful in this regard. There are also products and substances that increase oxygenation of your body. Eating more light foods will help the entire process, specifically sprouts and young tender greens, before they become mature. These hold within themselves a very high level of complex proteins and minerals that will help this process. So eating more light foods with the enzymes undamaged will assist this process of mineralization and increase the absorption of oxygen. This requires your soil to be healthy and pure, of course, and at the same and the same is true for water. At the physical level, these are a few things that will help greatly, but it is best to engage in a synergetic process of doing everything you can to increase your vitality, including the clarification and evaluation of your beliefs and interactions with others. As you strengthen your core and your life force, other aspects of your consciousness will be strengthened. You will have more focus. You will have more energy and stamina. At the emotional level, there is another aspect for you to consider. Negative thought forms and discordant emotional energies being expressed in the planetary mass consciousness can degrade your life force. As you become more sensitive to your own life force, you must protect your energy. Your life energy is precious, and you shouldn't give it away to just anybody. Take your power back. You should keep it for your own enhancement and for those who are close to you. You shouldn't give energy away frivolously, and you shouldn't take on the negative emotional patterns or the emotional neediness of others. As we previously mentioned, this planet is a school for emotion, so it is very intensely emotional place where emotions abound, and this will only increase as your planet and your entire solar system enter more fully into the ascension process. Those who give their own energy away to take care of others will find their energy depleted. This depletion of your energy comes directly out of your cause. As you become more sensitive to energy in general and to your own energy in particular, you will be able to sense when someone is drawing on your energy and when you're giving it away. That's why in the law of one, it's very quick to tell you that martyrdom is a negative polarity. There has to be equal exchange of balance of energy. Emotional caretakers need to be especially aware of their life force. You can so completely take care of another person emotionally that you will have nothing left for yourself. This is not spiritual enlightenment or attainment. This is a misuse of energy. Giving away your life force may seemingly come from a place of compassion and wanting to help others, but if you have drained yourself in the process, then you have damaged yourself and this is not good. Yes, guys, it's why I get so upset when people think I should be teaching yoga for free.  Should you expect people like me to get up at three o'clock in the morning, do my practice, then teach a three-hour mysore, then go work a full-time job and be of service to you without you paying anything?  It's an exchange of energy. I have to pay my teacher in India. I would never accept tutelage from him for free. And before people, a little bit of knowledge goes a long way. People will say, well, people in India used to not pay. Yes, they did. When young boys would go to gurus like Krishmacharya and asked to be taught by them, but they didn't have money to pay, you know what they had to do? They had to move in with Krishmacharya and be a servant, give him massages whenever he wanted to, wanted you to go to the grocery store, clean his house, do his laundry. They were not getting that yoga for free. They were paying for it by their service. If you don't have money and you want to learn yoga, go talk to the Shala owner, the teacher. Usually there's a karma program where you can come in and clean the bathrooms or clean the studio to get yoga for free, but it's an exchange of energy. If you or someone that thinks people should be subservient to you for free or you should be subservient to others for free, as they just said, let me read this again for those in the back who did not hear. Emotional caretakers need to be especially aware of their life force. You could so completely take care of another person emotionally that you will have nothing left for yourself. This is not spiritual enlightenment or attainment. This is misuse of energy. Giving away your life force may seemingly come from a place of compassion and wanting to help others, but if you have drained yourself in the process, then you have damaged yourself and this is not good. Organ resonance. Each organ of your body, indeed, every cell of your body has a resonant build of energy. Even the atoms in the molecular structures that compose your cells have their own resonance. But when you get to the level of the cells, you start to have very complex overtones and resonance. And when you collect millions and millions of cells together to create tissue and organ, you have a very complex sound vibrational matrix, indeed. For example, one resonance is that of your heart in relationship to your kidneys. The fundamental resonance establishes a balance between the connection of these organs. And we're speaking of an energetic connection, not a functional connection. Western medical science would say that these are two very different functions. However, from an energetic standpoint, the heart emerges out of the kidney function. The Chinese are very clear in their understanding of this. When the kidneys are strong, the heart can be strong. When the kidneys are weak, often the heart is weak. A healthy body's fundamental resonance establishes a balance and each of your organs has a resonant field of energy. And that is the harmonic relationship to all of your other organs. To be in health is to literally be in harmony. The resonance, the sound and the frequency that are emitted by your various organs must be in a harmonic relationship to obtain and maintain health. Disease occurs when something goes out of the harmonic relationship. The increasing intensity of planetary energetics is a tremendous challenge to all biological systems because as the planetary vibratory rate increases, everything is increasing in its vibratory rate. It will clear down to the molecular and atomic levels. So the cell and tissues that make up your organs are also being agitated. And due to emotional issues, some organs will transit up faster than others. For instance, the liver often holds suppressed angers. The kidneys often hold suppressed fear. Yes, and kidneys are also connected to the knees. So if you have knee issues, that's fear of the future. The lungs often hold suppressed grief. And there are other organ-emotional relationships as well, but we all know this. We've talked about this a lot on this channel. If your entire system is starting to go into vibratory rate and responsive planets increasing vibratory rate, unexpressed emotions held in different organs of your body will keep these organs at a lower level of vibration while the rest of your system is going upwards. Another reason many people are experiencing an increased intensity of emotions is because the organs are holding, those emotions are literally discharging them in order to catch up with the vibratory shift. Emotional expression. In the mystery schools, when an initiate came in to be reviewed before the next initiatory phase or ritual, he or she would be scanned by the priestesses and the priest. He or she would be scanned for energetic and sound signatures indicating his or her emotional balance. If the initiate was balanced enough, he or she would be allowed to proceed to the next level. If the initiate was not balanced enough, he or she would be sent back because to go higher up the initiatory path without balance would be dangerous. If you are not exercising, if you are not making sure your food is for your dosha, you are not in a place to ascend. They speak about this in this book at the beginning of this book. You cannot be like massively overweight and ascend. You cannot be weak and ascend. Your body has to be strong enough to handle the rise in vibration. You would not pour a gallon of water into a paper cup. The paper cut would break and dissolve. You would have to pour a gallon of water into a very strong bowl that could hold it. Same thing with your body. No excuses. I don't wanna hear any. There are literally no excuses. Yeah, I don't care if you're in a wheelchair. I don't care if you're...  And half of his body doesn't work. If he can do it, you can do it. If you're in a wheelchair, you work your arms.  Like, there is no excuse. It is your own laziness. I take no excuses.  No excuses. All right. You cannot remove negative emotions. You must transmute them. Again, yes, it's like doing the shadow work. Doing the shadow work, you're facing your negative emotions and you're working through them. No one's gonna come and just bippity boppity boo, remove them for you. It's not the point of being human. You're missing the point if you think that's gonna happen. You can't wish them away. You can't think happy thoughts to wish them away. You have to deal with them. That's true spirit. How I'm speaking to you right now is true spirituality. Tell my teacher speak to me.  There is no enabling toxic positivity. It's real and it's raw. And you have to feel things. You have to move. You have to sweat. You have to get uncomfortable. It's the only way. Many humans believe that negative emotions and negative experience needs to be plucked out. And that's not truly accurate because these negative emotions and experience are an expression of the individual's fundamental perception of reality. When you transmute your negative emotions, your energy system comes into balance and there's nothing to be plucked out. The energy that has been congested is now free and contributes to your evolution and your illumination. Using sound to stay healthy. The fundamental reason for degenerative disease as we understand it is the devitalization of the earth. At the beginning of time, the vitality of the earth was very strong because of the glaciers. Glacial activity and the grinding and transformation of the rocks into minerals. The waters were highly mineralized. The soil was highly mineralized and the oxygen levels was higher. Your scientists have estimated that the present level of oxygen average is around 18%. Whereas it was 30% several hundred years ago. With this tremendous decrease in oxygen levels, the amount of Prana available has also decreased. One might ask why this is happening. It is happening for many reasons. But in the terms of human behavior, it is happening because you are decimating the forest, even the rainforest, and you are polluting the ocean so that the plankton and the other organisms which produce oxygen in the oceans are stunted. As a collective, humans are so disconnected from the earth they are destroying the very bedrock of their existence because most people are running around independently pursuing whatever they are trying to achieve and they're personalized. There is often little cultural appreciation or contemporary understanding of the need to honor the earth mother. Consequently, there is a mass destination of those fundamental generators of oxygen as well as a depletion of mineral reserves through agriculture. The question of sound is a complex question because there are specific frequencies that will help with specific health problems. And many of your researchers are now uncovering this therapeutic use of sounds. In the coming decades, sound therapy is going to be very big part of your medicine and that's true. It has turned into a big part of our medicine. It is true that you will discover how to use one frequency for one problem and another frequency for another problem and ultimately you will learn how to use sound to assist and heal those who suffer. But it is equally true that simply learning these methods and using them will not remove the deeper calls of much disease which is your disconnection from earth itself. The disconnection must be healed. In terms of self-healing, you can play it the law of fundamental tone. A fundamental tone rules over all the other tones in relationship to it. In music, for example, if you push the damper pedal of a piano so that all the strings can vibrate freely, you strike the C note, all C notes above and below that note you struck will resonate. They will begin to sound through the law of synthetic resonance and this is the law of the fundamental tone. So a fundamental tone can set off resonance in other octaves. What this means practically speaking is that you can go to a place of your own consciousness where you are healthy, radiant and have the attributes that you desire. By making the sounds from the higher state of consciousness on a regular basis, you can transmute conditions in the lower octaves because you have sounded the fundamental tone. If you have an unhealthy situation, a condition to be changed, you go into a place in your consciousness where you don't have that condition. When you find that place, you repeatedly make the sound expressing that positive quality through your own voice. By doing this over and over again, eventually we'll have a positive effect. Sometimes even an immediate positive effect. Editors note, the fundamental, the law of fundamental tone as used by the Hathors refer to specific tones you can create with your own voice that match specific mental emotional states that correspond to healing states of body and mind. These fundamental tones are unique to each individual and different from person to person. In other words, there is no fundamental tone for all persons. By using the method the Hathors described, you can shift physical conditions in yourself through the power of your own voice and intent. Using a sound during emotional emergencies. There are two ways of working with sound that we would recommend when dealing with large group of people in an emergency situation. One level of action would be audible and one would be inaudible. If the group is coherent enough to understand and accept audible sounds as a viable tool, then you could simply go into the space within yourself that is ever unchanging, calm, peaceful, and where the feeling of connectedness and love exists. It may be challenging to find that space within yourself while going through a chaotic experience, but it is still there because it's the core of consciousness itself. You then simply get in touch with that coherent place within your being and make sounds that express that calming energy. As people hear those sounds, they will register that calming state through the law of resonance. If you are in a group or situation where audible sound is inappropriate, you can make the sound silently and radiate them outward from you into the group. This will have a more subtle effect, but will still be a positive one. Editor's note, the use of audible sound in a group situation is highly complex phenomenon that can easily change the belief system of others. Generally speaking, it is preferable to work with sound in group situations via silent sounds rather than sound that is audible unless the group is clearly understands and accepts the use of audible sound as an emotional on being the sound-filled vessel hearing a CD. Hearing our catalytic sounds and feeling them in person is a superior way to receive the vibratory information because more activation occurs when your physical body is in the same space where the sounds are being made. However, just hearing the sound on either a video or audio system will still have a powerful and positive effect. We do our work primarily for sound vibration. The cognitive pieces we are giving are less than 1% of what we offer, but it is important because it creates context for transformation as we view it, the misuse of sound. Sound has been misused in many civilizations. Atlantis was working with free energy and sound was a crucial part of this. They talk about this in Tartaria as well. However, the Atlanteans became overly mental and disconnected from their own biological roots. As a result, they became very unbalanced and destroyed themselves despite their advanced technologies. Though not generally known among the populist, sound is now being developed as a weapon of war. And unless your global civilization gets back to its senses and honors the earth and all life, your civilization could create something similar to what happened in Atlantis, which we know we're mirroring what happened in Atlantis right now, energy healing. If a healer channels a healing force of energy without judgment about the person being healed, the healing will be pure. If the healer holds judgment about the person being healed as the healing force is channeled and the healing won't be pure, something of the healer's judgment will be communicated energetically to the one being healed. This would be a disservice. And if the healer cannot suspend his or her judgments, at least during session, it would be best if the session were canceled. The thought form of judgment can have negative impact, even if no words are spoken. With the one you call, Jesus of Nazareth, knelt down and washed the feet of his disciples, it was a great lesson. Here we have a master being who brought himself so far up the spiral of ascension that he could get on his hands and knees and wash the feet of beings who were absolutely unconscious compared to him. This was part of his teaching and it was not done out of ego. It was done out of honoring and celebrating of the essence of those beings. It was done without any judgment. That is the model for an ascended being. A truly ascended being has no trouble washing the feet of those who are less spiritually developed. Sound and vibration. It is our understanding sound or vibration is the foundation of all reality. While you experience matter as solent, we experience as energy fields that vibrate or oscillate at different harmonics. Consequently, it is possible for you to change harmonics and shift out of matter into energy. It is also possible to shift back from energy into matter when you understand how it is done. The ships that we originally used for space exploration and for entering your solar system were based on sound and vibration. It is a very ancient understanding of our culture and goes back to our roots. We have known this and operated this way for millennia. And I think that's a great place to stop that section. We'll pick up next week with healers and the healing.