Hello, everyone. I'm Chou Moon from Huawei. Our topic today is companies and sales match up with automobile companies, IT infrastructure. I will introduce sales match practice in production environment. Since launch in 2018, Huawei application sales match has served a large number of customers. The practice is part one of them. A leading automobile manufacturer in China. I will introduce how cloud native help upgrade the IT infrastructure. About me, an architect of Huawei application sales match currently developed cloud native projects such as sales match, Kubernetes, and Microsoft. And also help promote sales match and cloud native in China. I'm also of cloud native sales match history, how people learn sales match and history. My talks include four and three parts. The first part is consumer business background and the current solution. The second part is about the challenge of current solution and most importantly, target cloud native solution to solve these challenges. And finally, I will introduce auto migrate current solution for target cloud native solution. Our customer is a leading automobile manufacturer with the growth of automobile demand in China. The companies still needs to develop dramatically, especially with their new energy vehicles and put great pressure on their IT infrastructure, such as increased complexity and application becomes complicated and need to integrate with other platform. Also increased capacity and number of vehicles increased. Also the most secure requirements include excess control and the excess authentication. Also having jobs work are high and high actually costs are big problems. This is a current architecture. The customer actually engineer to us. They seem known for the popular Microsoft framework several years ago. Instead, they're all Microsoft platform, based on DNS, ERB and NGX and provide a service discovery for advancement in dependent platform rather than in education. The total architecture greatly depends on the central ERB which provides for internal service communication. And DNS is responsible for internal service resolution. ERS and JAX provided care estimation for the ERS traffic. And Zoom played the role of outstanding application delivery in JAX on additional process traffic for local service instance. To better understand the difference of current solution and the target cognitive solution, we will compare the abstraction view to architectures. Abstraction of the current architecture will look like this. The top is application layer. Applications are developed with multi-language. And the third layer is responsible for deploying environment. Currently, applications are deployed on working machine and the DNS. The central part is the second layer provides service management by integrating the ERB, DNS and NGX. Because of the second layer, Microsoft's platform, self-application are mainly developed in screen-foot instead of screen-cloud. And this is the abstraction of target solution compared to the previous one. And the main difference is the second layer and the third layer, replacing the ERB, DNS and NGX integrated platform with unified SysMatch infrastructure and upgrade deployment from VAM and VMS to commits. We can see the tools of architecture have changed a lot. So our customer engineer called the current solution self-developed match-like infrastructure before the period of SysMatch. Next, we will introduce the challenge of current solution through several aspects and focus on how the target cognitive solution solves this challenges perspective. First, let's see the search discovery and role balance. With current solution, DNS and ERB, they are important role in search discovery and role balance. There is a real instance to ERB registers SysMain and ERB IP to DNS. Consumer called DNS and sent a request to resolve ERB IP and ERB management traffic to select real instance. Per known NGX process request to local service and with target solution, Kubernetes and Istio known NGX service register. Istio will automatically retrieve registered data from Kubernetes and set process in a set traffic and perform service discovery. Then send a request to one select real instance and the server set process in the set traffic and perform server set traffic management. Compare two solutions by following views. First, as for service registry, a former NGX service name and ERB register to DNS and the latter known in the registry. And then for service discovery, the former is by ERB and DNS and the latter is dynamic data plan and control plan. The former role balance greatly depends on ERB and the latter is by client set process. When deployed a new service with current solution on the registry, there is had to manually register new service name to DNS by the target solution. Istio can get the service and its search instance automatically from Kubernetes. With current solution, consumer need to send a request to internal ERB and ERB and NGX act as a static proxy. And with target solution, consumer sending request to a target service request is accepted by much data which act as a transparent proxy for form service discovery and maintenance. Next is canary release. Canary is one important part in our customer's data work with current solution. The ERB is responsible for routine traffic to various instance and the traffic to a different version depends on the number of instances. There are three instances of version one and two instances of version two. So that 60% of traffic will be sent to version one and 40% will be sent to version two. With target solution by Istio, traffic rate for different version can be specified. With our version controls proportion of traffic each version and this date. For them as above rule, we resort 30% traffic to an instance of version two and the other 70% traffic will be available to version one. No matter how many instances this version has. It says providing routine policy, such match can control all of the traffic much that condition is looking to a certain version. The condition is related to protocol as for HTTP. The condition can be HTTP header path, source IP and so on. This manifest makes with DTV group header is sent to version two and the other still is sent to the default version one. With target solution, source match can do canary release for a group of cells just send the route for the first cells and the other set in the group for the following route. Mixed traffic from version one is sent to version one and from version two, it's sent to version two. This table summarized difference of two canary as for weighted policy with the current solution which is controlled by instance number and with target solution with weight can be specified flexibly and former than the last part of traffic match policy and later can control traffic to a certain version according to match condition. And current solution now support out for traffic always support out for traffic and target solution can support both L7 and L4 include TPD, TIS, HTTP, and with current solution some L7 policy is developed in application code but with target solution or a back platform no need any changing of application code. As mentioned in application back one that I need to resume security requirement for the development of customer business by with current solution all in KLS termination is provided or in grass traffic that is injects provide KLS termination all application have to develop HTTBI service and maintain key and the certificate by themselves and access control is embedded in the application for some confidential in place and with the target solution system I have to provide transparent security variety as termination by gateway or greater only to upload key and certificate in the form of commit secret I need to also offer as mutual tiers for authentication just a email email void result and service cost changes includes provide service to service secure service to service communication and provide each service with an authentically representing is equal and also can all make key and a certificate condition, position and distribution provide authorities access control for target service or target service in place these people also shows the difference of security both provide KLS termination and JLT authentication other former does not provide any service to service security and other provides mutual tiers authentication or transparency transparent tiers encryption or key management system automated key and certificate generation distribution and rotation and provide flexible access control custom condition such as either source or target access and target solution need our customer security perfected in its practice when a system becoming complicated need observability or top short and optimize the applications by the way it's kind of solution or in parallel to NJACs generate access as well and NJACs export export metric choosing agent in this node can generate system for Java applications or with target solution you still can generate metric present access level for all service by cell cards service developers do not need any extra work for this first proxy will generate service on key metrics covers latency, errors and situations and also generate spans on behalf of applications Chelsea can also generate access log for service traffic compare the two solutions in this table the main difference is that so much can help collect the observability data for and language with more accessibility transparency and flexibility Chelsea can generate all kinds of metrics and the metadata all dimensions can be configured perhaps they can generate spans for applications applications only need to propagate several request papers and cause they generate access log so that a lot can also be configured and also based on the access metric topology can be built give a global view of the application and services OK this is the target calling this architecture this we will look like this our unified infrastructure companies used to work together not only provide application defined environment but also provide self-managing platform covers panel release search discovery load balancing and measurement circuit breaker forward injection traffic mirror which are in the direction authentication and authority also provide magic crystal and stone we can see the data plan works as a transparency approach perform traffic management security and also build it on behalf of applications and in broad speedway give more flexibility the injects can manage traffic together with the circuits and control plan is responsible for boring and managing the configuration and distribute the policies to processes and circuits and there is another way of solution and the solution can easily configure or integrate with consumers existing canary kiosk and platform and magic login triscent system as separating all common functions from application code and also for infrastructure solution can help developers focus on the business summary about aspects of this table the key difference is architecture and mechanism the former is an intuitive platform provide a basic self discovery and advance and the latter is an infrastructure designed to handle application and communication as for components the former platform consists of different components there will be signals and injects and the latter is a unified infrastructure including control plan and data plan both these processes are the former really aesthetic process and the latter is the transparent process can be the tech and the managed service traffic this may be the biggest difference and the most important characteristic of CSMASH as for box work the former greatly depends on manual operation and the latter most likely works automatically as for CSMASH the former only provides self discovery and advance which is coded in application better provide powerful CSMASH and covers connection observation and security and this difference results in both cost and result reduction of customer to give the IT investment next the path found is called to migrate your migrate user's current solution to target community solution safely and gracefully the main idea is to develop a new environment with target solution and gradually speed up traffic on the cloud to cover this question to ensure reliability of one last test it is required to manage service to offer to when your commitment distance are available first to to determine the other distance and the commitment distance it is required the other distance and commitment distance found to last service shall the CSMASH discovery and advance and our solution is last service refer to commitment and commitment distance that is that the same way policy lecture and the rule of traffic to both community and environment as in this case my consumer service called target service vehicle traffic can be ruled to commitment distance also commitment to commitment distance that and the most important it is required to retry commitment distance and commitment distance not work and our solution is that we try the most located to specify which type of grant and commitment distance and the other vehicle the process will look like this request to commitment distance feels for some variable environment or long term reason automatically we try to remove the grant distance which had a success and the consumer request success finally it is required and the rule of commitment traffic to commitment distance with higher priority fuel or through grant reasons only when commitment distance are not healthy and our solution is by use of local locality but when commitment split a small part of traffic to grant distance and commitment distance are not healthy so switch all traffic to grant when the commitments are totally unhealthy and showing this table in a half of the traffic instance are unhealthy it still can get seventy percent of traffic it is required to make sure both primary and secondary instance and the secondary grant instance meets the traffic capacity requirement and that's all of our practice simply for the time


Well the story came from a tip-off actually Johnny Shapiro got a tip-off that ultimately we couldn't prove to be true it didn't check out but what it did do was focus the minds of the team on this very sizeable contract and the company that really was little known had a company registered to a beach shack in Kangaroo Island and a post office box in Singapore and they'd won this contract that was worth in the end more than half a billion dollars from the Australian government. Look I think it's really important to know about this story because here in Australia there is bipartisan support to have a border protection regime which involves offshore processing on Manus Island and in Nauru. To have that program to have integrity you need to make sure that these contracts are administered correctly and that services are delivered. Now what we found out from our reporting is that the services were largely non-existent there was terrible maintenance the food was often not delivered bus services didn't run on time so the actual humanitarian needs of the refugees were often not taken care of despite this contract being worth more than five hundred and thirty million dollars. A very encouraging aspect of working on this story is that you can see how investigations and in-depth reporting can actually have an impact. Since we started reporting in January this contract and the company that has been awarded it is the subject of an investigation by the Auditor General. The Home Affairs Department also ordered their own review which has since been released and from that we see significant concerns about the way the contract was awarded. You need investigative reporting to dig some of this stuff out and it's been quite encouraging to see that it's actually had an impact.


Listen boys, I understand Frankie boy knows more than everyone else about diet and nutrition He knows everything there is to know and everyone has to copy every single thing I do and say as the holy grail and for some reason those same people pretend I don't exist problem is said people don't know ten percent of what I know about health and nutrition and Therefore misunderstand the applications and context of whatever I suggest in this case adding honey to a carnivore diet I do find it funny how several weeks after I published certain videos that people suddenly start discovering What was in my video? They just started trying new things. It's new and exciting Such as adding honey to the carnivore diet as pathetic and sad as these people are You know They're just trying to maintain relevancy and I understand when you're not smart and handsome and hard-working What else can you do besides copy the person that is doing all the work for you? But by doing so they're harming people's health for those of you that haven't seen my recent day of eating I showed you guys. I was consuming several hundred grams of carbohydrates worth of honey every single day That's roughly 15 tablespoons of honey Aka a jar of honey every day and for any of you that have been in nutrition a little while You're thinking Frank a jar of honey. That's a little crazy and you're absolutely right But apparently not everyone has an IQ high enough to understand that and you know Look into other things before just copying what I'm doing I thought I made it pretty clear in those bodybuilding those day of eating videos that I wasn't doing that for health It was purely for bodybuilding and I even acknowledged several times. It's not healthy and I don't feel good doing it I explicitly said that it's not like I was implying it plus. I also said several times I'm doing extra things behind the scenes I'm not showing you guys to make it less harmful and the reason I'm not showing you guys those things is because They would have been copied as well one thing I forgot to add in here is that these people don't deserve to be mentioned Acknowledged in any capacity whatsoever Mainly because they refuse to talk about what's going on in the world right now In fact, they're actually part of the agenda and under no circumstance Will these people that are copying me tell the truth about why we're locked inside Why half the grocery store shelves are empty?  It's inappropriate and all of these influencers The majority of these influencers on all social media platforms are a part of this group of people That is just trying to deceive you to make money.   Do I really have to explain this just think of honey from a logical standpoint? It's a food we would have procured in fairly small amounts infrequently throughout the year You know I'm arguably eating a year's worth of honey in one day from an ancestral context There's no way someone that's thinking straight is going to recommend anyone consume honey as a predominant carbohydrate source for too many reasons as I said I haven't been disclosing everything to you guys because of these copycats Essentially by showing only part of my day these idiots ate up the honey trap and I've proved their plagiarism in the past by intentionally lying about certain things that they copied my lies and it wasn't true But no one really seemed to care. I'm not going to say specifically what I'm doing in addition to consuming honey You know am I taking digestive enzymes am I taking certain vitamins and minerals to counteract the high sugar intake? Am I taking liver support stuff? Am I taking certain probiotic bacteria? Am I doing something special to the honey itself? Am I not even eating honey? Who knows will we ever find out and Unfortunately, that's not going to be today, but I will probably tell you guys in a little while But I will explain further why honey is not good and what other carbohydrate options you have First let's understand why I chose honey in the first place and I doubt any of these clowns explain this White sugar is sucrose which requires a sucrose enzyme to be broken down into glucose and fructose Honey itself is already broken down because it's half glucose and half fructose So your body gets readily available glucose and then the fructose is processed in the liver So it's basically a source of direct energy nutrition that the body does not have to do anything extra for it It doesn't have to digest it. It doesn't have to produce enzymes. This fructose to glucose ratio in honey is pretty much as good as it gets from a National foods perspective. There are some fruits that have a 50-50 glucose to fructose ratio as well And I think fruits are a much better option than honey here. I actually have some Grapes that my sister's eating and like organic grapes are probably the most affordable and accessible fruit I also have kiwis and cherries those have a fairly good glucose to fructose ratio That's similar to honey followed by bananas if you tolerate starch to your fruits This is where we start asking, you know Our starches like potatoes better than honey because you know more of them is digested into glucose and fructose You know again it depends on the person and I think at the top of the list is going to be those fruits because they have Vitamins minerals and hydration that honey does not if you compare how you feel after eating a hundred grams of sugar With their grapes versus honey. Those are two very different things You know the honey kind of knocks you out gives you like an insulin spike You feel kind of tired and people generally don't have the same reaction to fruit So without telling you guys what I specifically do what I'm actually doing This is my suggestion try some fruits You can try potatoes and certain grains if you want But I think most of you guys will feel better with the correct fruits The main reason I've stuck to honey over fruit is mainly to stay carnivore, but by the end of this year early next year I don't think I will be carnivore anymore. I'm still using it temporarily to fix my iron overload issues Before you start sucking down sugar like it's the end of the world Remember I removed fat from my diet very very lean meat if you combine sugar and fat The majority of you will get dysbiosis gut issues Bacteria overgrowth candida Sebo small intestinal bacteria overgrowth as well as small intestinal fungal overgrowth CFO The body is not meant to handle large amounts of carbs and fats at the same time So if you follow a typical carnivore diet of ribeye steak That's relatively fatty and throw honey in there It's pretty much a recipe for dysbiosis the combination of the fatty red meat the high sugar honey Plus the iron in the meat is perfect for candida overgrowth pathogens love iron Combine that with a lack of copper too much cooked food. Say hello to a fungal infection There's also the stress of the fruit toast itself It can definitely lead to a fatty liver under certain circumstances And you also have fruit toast malabsorption when consuming very high amounts of it The liver can only process so much and you'll end up with what we said the bacterial overgrowth the dysbiosis the gut issues Or if you're lucky just some diarrhea But if you do this consistently you will eventually get issues if you consistently combine high fat With high sugar, you know, you might be okay the first few times you do it But then as soon as you get that overgrowth So just to summarize the reason I've been allegedly Consuming honey is because I'm trying to maintain a reasonable energy level despite the health problems I have at the moment from iron overload. I don't feel good consuming honey I honestly don't feel good consuming food in general and I would rather switch over to fruit Something that has more water-soluble vitamins minerals That's a more complete food that you would feel much better eating again I'm trying to maintain the carnivore diet image at least temporarily it makes sense You know, what's the point of eating meat and fruit right now if I don't really like fruit I don't want to have to access fruit and honeys doing the job right now Very very important if you decide to incorporate carbohydrates into your diet that the fat intake is lowered As I said stick to leaner meats leaner cuts replace those fat sources with carbohydrate calories You know even move to like pasture raised veal if you have access to it something that's lower in iron If you combine fat and sugar in large amounts consistently you will get gut issues and again You might be able to get away with it once a week Some people might be super lucky and never get gut issues But there are people out there that will eat some honey and a steak and have their stomach ruined for months And I'm sure there's a couple people in the comments raising their hands right now That's me. I want it to be very clear that I unintentionally mislead people about what I was doing But they picked it up at face value and ran with it You know in turn their lack of understanding of nutrition as a whole has put me in a position Where I have to try to prevent people from getting sick You know what's gonna end up happening is those people are gonna suggest Oh at honey to your carnivore diet that people are gonna have problems Then who knows are they gonna go to them for consultations or whatever and ask them for further advice When they're the person that got them sick in the first place. I don't know in the future I will go over the things I am doing for my bodybuilding When I'm ready when Jim's open up when I launch my workout routine. So thank you guys for joining me today Let's see what they copy next. It's unfortunate that they won't talk about what's going on in the world Despite half of my videos being about you know this new infrastructure and how we're all gonna get fried like chickens But I guess they just want to steal the information I have about honey So you guys know how to support me down below in the comments Definitely share the video definitely share the channel and thank you guys for for letting me know that you know These people are stealing my ideas and and my dietary stuff. I usually I have to find out myself