How to import products from CJ Dropshipping to our Shopify store. There are a few methods to add products from our suppliers to our store. The first method is by clicking on Add Products on the left and entering the products by URLs or IDs. The second method is by clicking on Upload CSV to import products in bulk. The third method is by using our one-click importer available through the AutoDS Chrome Helper extension. This is the method we'll be demonstrating in this example. To begin, let's head over to CJ Dropshipping and select a product to add to our store. We'll do so by entering their flash cell. Here we have a lot of products on sale to choose from so let's begin by clicking on this bracelet over here. Now once we are in the product page we'll notice the import to AutoDS button that is available through the AutoDS Chrome Helper extension. So we're going to click on that import to AutoDS button. And now all of the product and all of its variants and all of its details is being imported to the drafts page of our store. Once the button switches colors we'll know that the product finished importing to our store. So now let's head over to AutoDS and click on the drafts page on the left side. And here we have that bracelet that we just imported to the drafts section of our store. To start the optimization process click on the arrow and here you can optimize anything and everything you want on this product in all of its variants and forms. Once we are done with the optimization process click on import on the right side. And all of the products details will move from drafts to products where it will start being monitored by AutoDS and all of its stock and prices and everything else will be monitored by AutoDS and anyone will be able to buy the product. Now that the import process finished we can click on products. And here is that bracelet that we just imported live on our store and anyone can enter our store right now and buy this product. So here on the right side we can see that the products by ID will take us to our supplier page where we got the product and the Shopify item ID will take us to our product page on Shopify to show us the product on our store. So here it is as you can see in all of its variants already imported to our store and that is how simple it is to import products from CJ dropshipping to your Shopify stores in just the click of a button.


What's good charge where I was back again with another video so Money in the bank has been completed. There's been a lot of people talking about just the overall show What they enjoyed on? Social media and the biggest thing obviously is Roman Reigns getting pinned by J Uso and it's so crazy That you know people really just talking about this and how amazing it was and and looking for To where the story is going to next. It's so crazy that I even mentioned it on my thoughts and opinions video That Jay Originally was the guy that pinned Roman for the very first time in WWE on the main roster when he was with the shield Jay was the one to pin him off the very same move the very same Uso splash ah It's crazy how that happened. I was come full circle, but now the discussion has become Will Jay Uso be the person to de-throne Roman Reigns and become the undisputed WWE Universal Heavyweight Champion of the world And that's why I wanted to make this video because that's where a lot of people Mindset is going towards Jay Uso. It needs to be Jay. He's the one that pinned him It started with him He needs to be the one to end it all and there's been people that's been on that train for quite some time now There are even some people in the community that are saying Cody Rhodes story is over now. It's not Cody story anymore. It's Jay story I want to get my thoughts on just How that would even work out if that is a viable option of having Jay be The guy to be Roman. Well, I'm gonna be honest with you Even though Jay is the first person to pin Roman Reigns in over three years And I think that's that's an amazing story to tell. I do not think Jay is gonna be the one to get the job done I just I just don't see it. I mean granted Jay himself has said he doesn't want to be the tribal chief He said that before money in the bank, you know, if anything he would want solo to be the next tribal chief, so Honestly just off of a story point. They've already said that but now Jay has this He has this point that he could possibly prove.  You're not the tribal chief anymore. People don't look at you the tribal chief anymore now I'm gonna beat you for that title. You know saying kind of bring it back full story when Right before the bloodline started Jay was trying to get the title off of Roman, you know So he wanted a title opportunity so to kind of bring it in once again full story here, but I just don't think Jay's the one to do it it would make sense a little bit in a storyline perspective because Jay knows Roman So well, but you got to also look at how they booked Roman here. Jay just didn't beat Roman by himself There was a lot of circumstances that played into Roman finally getting pinned. He got hit up with the double spear He got hit with multiple CTE super kicks he got hit with the low blow like there was a lot of things that happened For Roman to finally lose and he didn't have solos help cuz solo was incapacitated. He was out so That it took a lot just to get that win and then he got hit with the Uso splash It took a lot to get just to get that it wasn't just like Jay dominated Roman Reigns And we've seen this before, you know, and I think obviously they're going with Jay Versus Roman Reigns at SummerSlam, which I'm all for it makes sense The story is gonna be there and they're gonna build up a great match to the point Where it's gonna look like Jay is going to get the job done. He's gonna be that close But he's not going to succeed. He's not it just doesn't make sense for him to succeed in a sense of Okay, if he does win we we play the hypothetical Jay does win Crowd everybody will be a moment that will all remember Well, oh my god, he did it. All right, man, Jay was the one the entire time He was the chosen one to get the job done didn't what Are we gonna really sit it up here and say Jay's about to carry the company for the next I don't know how long his title reign would be Not to say that he possibly couldn't you know, I don't want to discredit him But Jay and Jimmy they've always been in that mid-card tag team role and not to say you can't step out of that I'm not saying they can't we've seen it with edge and Christian them being able to step out of it So it could be a possibility that maybe people buy into him being a main event guy But at the same time I Just don't see him being the one to take him down, you know, just to not only pin him once But pin him twice in back-to-back paper views in this time for the championship I just don't see Roman losing twice in a row Getting pinned. That's that's another thing You gotta kind of try to make people believe in and I'm sure people want to believe in it because it's like well He didn't want he can do it again, you know He knows Roman the best out of anybody else I get that but this has been a legendary title reign And I think if anything it needs to be something to potentially hand enhance somebody else Like I think we've not to say that obviously Jay can't get enhanced by this But he has been enhanced by this this entire feud main event Jay started with the bloodline He has been enhanced by this entire bloodline story. I don't think he can get any I mean he can get a little bit more Little a little bit more love because once again, it'll be the shock that oh Jay did it. He finally slayed Roman Reigns now. He's really technically the tribal chief You know, he doesn't want it. Oh Jay finally did it And you know, of course people will be excited about that. It'll be electric But you also got to make sure it makes sense in the long run and I just don't think Jay being the guy to do it At that point at SummerSlam, I just don't see him being the guy to get the job done For my it's not even that I wouldn't want him to see him in that position But it just it just doesn't make sense for me, you know, especially Knowing what we know we all know and I know some of you argument I'm not this Cody thing again, but we all know the reason why they did this is because the end of the Day their goal is to get Roman Reigns ultimately by himself Cody Rhodes tried to get that run back whether it most likely probably be at WrestleMania and then we run it back one more time The question is how will people be entertained? Will people be interested because here's another thing that I can see how some people will be like well It's Jay's time because right now the momentum is so much in Jay's corner over Cody Rhodes right now Here's the thing His momentum Jay's momentum is at an all-time high and people were a lot of people are gonna want to see this End in some way and fashion that Jay gets the job done But at the same time is up to WWE to find a way to book this correctly Where it makes sense where we finally get to the point of Roman and Cody But you also got to make sure you don't mess up Jay Uso in the process if that makes any sense like they got to still keep the interest alive with Jay Uso and But also kind of let it be known that at some point Cody's going to come come back for Roman and what they they haven't really done as of recently Cody hasn't even mentioned Roman and I think he needs to start alluding to that To kind of get people's mind thinking about it because right now everyone's only thing about Jay Jay should be the one to do it or a lot of people are thinking Jay should be the one to do it But I think they need to as soon as they finish up this Brock Lesnar situation I would still have Cody and I would have probably had Cody Just mention Roman like do a backstage interview How do you feel about what's going on with the the bloodline and have Cody say Set this was gonna happen and it's starting to happen Best believe everything is imploding the bloodline is not as strong as it used to be and Roman is finally starting to realize That without his family. He's not He's not the tribal chief. He's not as good as he think he is and Once it's all said and done I Will find my way to get my rematch with him and I will take that championship from him right now I got to focus on Brock something. It don't even have to be that just something to let the fans know I am still trying to finish the story because right now It looks like Jay may be the one to finish the story before Cody So I don't see him winning. I think it's gonna be a good match. They have at Summer Slam I just doesn't it doesn't make sense yet It just it just doesn't make sense for Jay to be the one to dethrone this legendary rain It's okay for him to pin him But it's not okay for him. Well, it just I think it would be a little bit of a Hot shot booking because I don't think his title rain. Well, I don't know I can't say that I cannot say that because we don't know Maybe it could be a a crazy good title rain if they booked it correctly It would be very weird to say Jay Uso is the champion the head champion of the company But at the same time a lot of people probably felt the same way about edge A lot of people probably felt the same way about Jeff Hardy, too You know these tag team legend guys now being heads of the company or top of the card How is that gonna work? So I I don't want to say That it isn't possible to do Him being the one to dethrone Roman. I just don't see it happening. You know, it's still once again is The story they've built so far has been consistent for the most part. Just don't see Roman Reigns Losing twice. That's all I'm saying. I don't see Roman Reigns losing back-to-back paper views I mean technically he did lose the previous pay-per-view, but back-to-back pay-per-views in a sense of Getting pinned. I Don't see that happening. So I think the story is still gonna ultimately come down Roman Reigns has no family member He's by himself and it's gonna be against Cody at some point probably at WrestleMania next year And then that's when it will all be done And at that point solo with a jump shipped and it's more so less and more or less It's gonna be a situation where I can see like maybe solo being one of Roman's last opponents before Cody steps in So I don't know we will see how that goes I think that's probably the route they're gonna go with solo will be the last to turn and then the Usos will Be backing up solo But even he with the help of the Usos probably may not be able to get the job done or something's gonna happen Where they they're not able to solo is not able to get the job done and maybe Cody will step in I don't know. That's just me kind of fantasy booking here So comment down below. Let me know. Do you guys think it should be Jay?  It shouldn't be him it should still be Cody, you know later on down the road Or do you guys even feel like maybe solo should do it? I know there's still some people on the solo train to get the job done Let me know down below we get out of that discussion, but I appreciate all the love and support you guys shown on channel road 250k And I'm still gonna speed it YouTube wrestling champ of the world. Appreciate y'all kicking me. See y'all next one


This week, C&P talks the latest on Manning and Advancement Opportunity, BCA changes are on the works, new uniforms, and there's a free new app just released designed especially for Navy leaders. Here we go, C&P's on the cover of Navy Times talking about what's on tap. Over the last year and a half, gaps at sea have dropped from more than 10,000 to less than 3,000.  Also, Manning levels are growing slightly, which means re-enlistment opportunities should stay strong and advancement rates will remain good, although there's still work to do in some rates. Now, the bad news. I have no details on the BCA changes, but the logic behind it should give you a sense of what's to come. It's about fitness, not just the test. We're looking at longer gym hours, updated standards for modern body types, and ways to provide additional fitness resources. Next, we have lots of new uniforms coming soon, and FY16 we'll see the Navy's new fitness suit, and by the end of 2016, we'll have updated service dress blues. Female versions are changing to match the crackerjack style, and we're getting zippers down the side of the jumper to make it easier to get it on and off. And check this out, we're also getting a zipper on the pants.  The 13 buttons will remain, cosmetically. Next up, eDivo is out on iTunes and Google Play. This was designed for Navy leaders, by Navy leaders to offer a host of resources and personal management tools. And don't think you have to be a divo just to use it. Give it a whirl. It's brand new, so your early feedback can help make it even better. Finally, the swill bonus has been reauthorized. Read more in this edition of the Weekly Wire. To sign up and get the wire in your inbox, email us here and keep sending in your feedback. We are reading it and responding. That's it for this video. I'm MC1 LA Fabrizio. Thanks for watching.


Hi and welcome to the session. Let us discuss the following question. Question says, integrate the following functions. Given function is 3x square upon x raised to the power 6 plus 1. First of all, let us understand that integral dx upon x square plus a square is equal to 1 upon a tan inverse x upon a plus c, where c is the constant of integration. Now we will use this formula as our key idea to solve the given question. Let us now start with the solution. You have to find integral of 3x square upon x raised to the power 6 plus 1 with respect to x. Now this integral can be further written as integral of 3x square dx upon square of x cube plus 1. Now we know 3x square is derivative of x cube. So we will substitute x cube is equal to t. So we can write put x cube is equal to t. Now differentiating both the sides with respect to x, we get 3x square is equal to dt upon dx. Now this further implies 3x square dx is equal to dt. Let us name these expressions as 1 and 2. Now we can write integral 3x square upon x raised to the power 6 plus 1 dx is equal to integral 3x square upon square of x cube plus 1 dx. Now using expression 1 and 2 this integral is equal to integral dt upon t square plus 1. Now using formula of the integral given in the key idea we get this integral is equal to tan inverse t plus c. Clearly we can see variable x has been replaced by t and a is equal to 1.  So we get tan inverse t plus c where c is the constant of integration. Now t is equal to x cube so substituting x cube for t we get tan inverse x cube plus c. So we get integral of 3x square upon x raised to the power 6 plus 1 dx is equal to tan inverse x cube plus c. This is our required answer. This completes the session. Hope you understood the solution. Take care and have a nice day.


Next up, we have Beyond Copy and Paste, creating interactive documentation with Maria Nagaga. Thank you so much, Mika. Thanks everyone for staying tuned with .NETConf 2019, and thank you for listening to my talk. So my name is Maria Nagaga. I am a Senior Program Manager on the Visual Studio and .NET team. I want to talk to you today about interactive documentation and how we think about that, and how it's important for our first-time developers as well as developers who are continuing to grow and build on our platform. So let's talk about documentation. Documentation is how we build trust with our developers. It's how we educate people, it's how we sell our products. Good documentation means that we are as invested in our product as much as you are. It's important as we build our documentation from first-time developers to people who are building code every single day, that we make sure that their on-ramp is as smooth and as effortless as possible. So let's talk about documentation today for a few minutes. With documentation today, it's getting really good, but there are still a few assumptions that we continue to make about our customers. First is the assumption of knowledge. Sometimes when content creators are writing documentation, they assume that the people coming to our documentation have prior knowledge of the framework and the languages being taught. The assumption of tech. As a content author myself, I sometimes continually find myself thinking of my experience as the only experience. I sometimes reference the operating system I'm using. I sometimes reference a version of Windows. I always assume that someone has as good internet bandwidth as I do. So a good example of this is providing links to certain specific downloads as well as screenshots that only reflect a particular operating system. The last one is the assumption of time. We are all really guilty of doing that. We assume that the people coming to read our content or use our videos or our documentation have more time than they do. Usually when people are learning things, trying new things or testing something out, they have a limited amount of time.  So we need to make sure we cater for that. So when we look at documentation today, majority of the documentation looks like this. It's static code. If we think about this from the perspective of a net new developer or brand new first-timer, they're often left wondering, what does this do? So we then go to Stack Overflow, we copy and paste a bunch of code from here and there. But then we still have for the challenge, especially as first-time developers, what template do I use in Visual Studio? What libraries do I need? What do all these error messages mean? We are telling people that for their first few lines of code, there's a huge on-ramp or even just to run a sample. For seasoned developers, you're probably working really fast and you don't want to copy and paste code in and out of your code base. You just want to see if this is the best thing for you. So we've noticed one thing as we begin to improve our documentation, our expectations have changed and we expect more from the people building our content to do more. Video has done great work in this space. We just launched right now with .NET videos on how we are investing in videos and how we are making sure that our developers have an interactive experience where they're able to listen, pause, and rewind. But still, we're assuming a bit of time on your side, but it's really good content, so please go and look it up. Another thing is interactive snippets online. This has actually become a requirement for languages and frameworks. When you can see the popular languages like JavaScript and Python allowing people to test APIs and syntax right within the browser, but we're also seeing it in popularly emerging languages as well such as Scholar and Go, where people are able to interact and test APIs right within the browser. But this is just a few pieces of the puzzles. So we have video on one side, we also have syntax iteration online. However, people want to have experiences that feel as native to the experience that they would have in the browser. We're seeing this in places like Microsoft Learn, where people are able to try and test things out, which would be similar to what their local experience would be. So when they do transition into an offline experience, it feels vaguely familiar. But then we also have the concept of trying. Now, this is something I constantly do. If I want to try out a new NuGet package, I will create a throwaway package, see if it's working, I will delete it, I will do it again. But you're seeing places like MPN with the help of companies like RunKit, creating these experiences online. We should be able to try out our NuGet packages and see what they're like right within the comfort of our browser. I'm hoping continuing to see here is a narrowing of the divide between documentation and code. The reason why we're seeing this is the landscape is continuously growing. We have developers such as people who are watching the show, writing blog posts every single day. We have hobbyists and the hobbyist field just keeps on growing from makers to web developers, mobile developers, IoT from social media influencers, where they're just constantly learning how to own their own online experience. We have data researchers who are using and mining data and making these analytical choices to make more informed decisions. We have educators, both CS educators as well as non-technical educators, where we're seeing in primary and secondary schools all around the world, where non-technical teachers are given the task to unwrap the next generation to be comfortable in this new world of coding. Finally, we have our students who want to explore and learn as much as possible and we need to provide those opportunities for them. When we're creating these new experiences around documentation, especially at Microsoft, there are things that we wanted to make sure that we landed very comfortably with the customers. We wanted to make sure that they had up-to-date documentation nice and fresh, referencing articles that were from 2019 versus 2003. We wanted to make it engaging and engaging is not just about making it flashy and cool. You want to make the navigation really easy. You want someone to land on a documentation page and know where they need to go. You also want the steps to be clear and quick and easy. If you go to .net right now and you go getting started, you will see how to get rough and running in 10 minutes, giving people the moment to feel empowered in 10 minutes or less. Finally, we wanted to create a friction-free learning experience. We wanted someone to be able to go onto a webpage and learn about the language without having to install all the tools or know everything. In 2017, we launched an interactive online experience with a product that I built called Try.net, which allows people to experiment and try.net the language within the browser. Let's talk about more about the Try.net interactive experience and what we offer there. We have our initial goals were in 2017 was to have an interactive documentation online, bringing us up to speed with the other languages that had been providing this for their customers. Most importantly, we wanted it to be login-free.  We wanted you to give that quick win. Finally, we wanted a fast on-ramp. We wanted it so you could edit the code online, click run, and see the results. We wanted you to feel that moment of success. But we also noticed that Try.net is growing, and those are some of the wonderful things I want to show you with you today. So when we first began in 2017, we wanted a friction-free online experience, and we did that. With Try.net and you go to docs.microsoft.com, you're able to run C-sharp code right within the browser. But as we began to notice that, there were certain difficulties. First of all, what happened if someone didn't have good internet access? What if somebody wanted to do this locally on their machine? How are we creating that experience for you? Also, we wanted to make a cheaper alternative that allowed people to run things easily within their website. And luckily, in 2018, we also got Blazor, and it allowed us to pivot from running things in containers on Azure Container instances to running things on the client side with Blazor. And not only that, because we created these experiences, it also allowed us to create a local experience with the.net Try.global tool. And if you look at my slide right now, we have a student in South Africa who calls this one of the most influential things that he's used that allows him to go and share C-sharp experiences with his fellow students. So we thank you and we hope that you continue to use us. And then we have a special surprise that I think a lot of you didn't expect, but we also have.net running in notebooks. And I'll be sharing that demo with you later today. So let's go and see some demos now. Okay. So as I said, Try.net started in the browser. So if you go to any single sample on the docs.microsoft.com quick starts, you notice that we have an editor right now. You can copy the code over, run it, and you have the direct results. You can also edit it easily right within the browser. So you're not restricted by what is in the code and you run it again. This is all running on Blazor. It's all running on the client side. It allows us to create opportunities where people could possibly add this to their websites as well, which we're hoping to enable in the future. But I also talked about the offline experience. If any of you have ever done a workshop or done a tutorial out there, you've probably had to get people to download the tools, clone the repo, make sure then the right operating system. And before you know it, it's two, three hours into the workshop and nobody has done anything. We wanted to make sure that people could be just successful with a .NET SDK and the .NET Tribal Global Tool and get things up and running. So I want to give you a quick demo of that. So we have this repo. It's our samples repo. You can go to .NET Try slash samples on GitHub and you'll see four clear instructions where we'll tell you to install the .NET Try Global Tool, which is available when you get today. Clone this repo. Then once you have this repo clone, I want you to go into the directory and type .NET Try. So as someone who prepares for demos ahead of time, I did the first three steps ahead of time. So I'm going to go right into here, type .NET Try, hit run, and what this is going to do, using Kestrel is going to start up my browser and it's going to give me an interactive markdown experience. If you look at the top, this is an MD file. So I'm going to continue into introduction to programming with C-Sharp and you'll notice that you have a list of instructions. It's like an interactive book. Let's go ahead and run this code. Sometimes the first run can take a few seconds, but bear with me. You have Hello World. I can go in, change it again, and I will put in my name, run it again, and I see the results. This gives people the flexibility to learn and experiment within the browser, giving you that nice interactive experience. So I hope that you'll give it a try for the next workshop that you're doing, or if you just want to give it a just try it out. But the big question here is how are we doing this? How are we able to have this mix of interactive code, C-Sharp code with a markdown file? So I'm just going to go over to Visual Studio Code and show you some of the magic that we're running. So I'm just going to close up the server here. So this looks like markdown that you've probably written in the past if you've done anything with a readme file. And if you add any sort of language, features within your markdown, you usually have to use a flag. So you'll notice that we have something called C-S, which is a C-Sharp. We're pointing to a specific region, right? So this is general C-Sharp regions called intro. We're pointing to a source file and we're pointing to a program.cs in my app. So let's see what this is. If I go over to my program.cs, you will notice that I have a couple of regions that are already have a bunch of switch case statements and I have a region called intro. So if I edited this and I said hello.net.com and I saved this file and let's just go ahead and run this again, .net try. I go back into my introduction to C-Sharp and I've edited it, right? So there's a seamless difference, but another thing that we have to be careful with is that if anyone's written documentation, sometimes it gets out of sync. Like how do we support our backing project as well as what we're putting in the documentation and we wanted to make sure that we supported that. So let's make some quick edits. Like how do we verify code? So I'm going to go over to VS Code again and I'm just going to make some clumsy mistakes over here. I am going to remove the semicolon, save that. I am going to change this from intros, from intro to intros. I'm going to save that again. And I want to show you a new addition we added called .net verify, right? So what it's saying, sorry, it's .net try verify, right? So this is going through and it's actually checking your markdown and checking your backing project to make sure that everything's going okay. And you'll notice that it says, hey, you're missing some things here. You're missing a semicolon and we also haven't found the intros region. So we wanted to make sure that before you hit push into GitHub, you're able to actually see any issues that might pop up, okay? And we're allowed, we enable you to do that. If you're someone who would prefer to see this in a UI format, it's also supported on the server, on the UI side as well. So I'm just going to click, do this, do .net try. It's going to launch the local host again. And if I go over to the introductions, it will tell me that the region hasn't been found. So on both sides, you have this experience where users are easily able to catch what their mistakes are. So let's go on since we've seen that. If you want to look at this more, you can go ahead to our GitHub repo and please give it a try. So I want to show you a little bit more and other experiences that we've been creating. So I showed you the .net try global tool and I showed you .net try running in the browser. But I also wanted to show you something that we just did this week and I'm really looking forward to hearing your feedback. If you go to our GitHub repo and you do .net slash try and you scroll to the bottom, which is pretty long, you can notice that we have a lot of files in there. You'll notice that we have the .net try enable back but we also have launch to binder. Now binder is a project, an open source project where it's able to point to a GitHub repo and take out all the notebook files and run them in the browser. So they spin up a nice container and you're able to look at it right within the browser. Over here, I already got this started. This is C sharp notebooks. Oh, sorry, let me start that again. That's launch binder. This is going to take a few minutes because it's configuring a container for us and the beauty of live demos is that this will happen as the circle spins around but what we wanted to show you here is that we want you to be able to try the .net notebook right within the browser. We wanted you to play around with it. Let me make this into C sharp. We're going to go into samples and I have an housing ML sample right here. So let's walk through this experience. You can install and you get packages, right? So this allows you to customize it, add any new get packages that you'd like. I'm going to hit shift, enter. What this is doing, is it going to new get? It's installing those packages for me. This will take a few minutes but as we want you to know that if you are using this on your side, you can install as many packages as you would like. You can notice that we're using the ML package or using auto ML and we're also pulling the data frames new get package as well. But as that's installing, let's look through the rest of the code so I can run through it. We're able to use our packages in the next cell as some of you might know. Notebooks have cell by cell execution. We also wanted to make sure that people had graphs being able to plot there. So we wanted to make sure that people were able to display graphs, scatter plots right within the new get packages, right within the notebook. Wanted to make sure that we made this feel authentic to people who are coming from the Python notebook space but we also wanted to make sure that our customers who are regular.NET developers that this also felt authentic and natural to them. So I'm gonna run the next browser. Maybe it's our next cell. Shift-Enter. All right. And as you can see, we have a nice table that has been delayed. We've actually been able to display table of the housing data. We can also plot some graphs which I think would be the cool thing. So let's start looking at some cool stuff. All right, let's run that again. All right, so I'm gonna go over to docs, samples, and housing. Let's pull in some packages. Bear with me, I am so sorry. But this should take a faster time than next time around. We've installed our packages. We're waiting for just one more which has been successfully installed. Let's run this, the housing data, right? So what we wanted people to be able to do was see the graphs and customize these graphs authentically. I don't know. Okay, so let's give it a moment and what we should see in a bit is a histogram that shows us a trend of all the housing data across California. While we're doing that, okay, let's give it one more time. Think the third. Yes, there we go. It just needed one more time. If you hit it hard enough, it will happen. So what we can see is that we have a histogram that shows all the data. If you're someone coming from the notebook space, we also have support, so you can zoom in and see these things in more detail. We also wanted to make sure that you're able to do more interesting graphs like scatter plots. So let's run this, give it a moment. All right, and as you can see, we have a scatter plot and guess which state this is? California. Sorry, I don't have a live audience. It's California. As we can see, the pricing is pretty high, but let's say I wanted to zoom in a little more. I can do this. I can zoom in on some of the hotspots. What this will do is I will actually cancel out everything else. So we wanted that rich interactive experience that people have come to expect and we're looking forward to your feedback. So if you have any questions on how to get started with the .NET kernel, that would come at a rounding nighttime. We won't have anything for people to try at the moment. However, we do have the MindBinder experiences available right now. So if you go over to our GitHub page and you'll be able to launch it right there from launching my Brander. So we have a couple of minutes for questions, I believe, when we have a chance and we can give it a go. Are we ready for questions? We are ready for questions. Fantastic. Well, hopefully you can see us here. I brought my brand new phone. Hello. That was really awkward. Well, you know, the first thing that's kind of cool is this one right here, Mika. How do you feel about what she just showed us? I think it's awesome. Have you ever tried, have you ever tried try.net? You're going to love this. I'm reading upside down. I'm going to read it. Looks like a fairly simple way to learn and write some C-sharp code inside your browser without having to first create a visual SEO solution. Plus, lots of sample code aims at new learners. Check it out. You have a fan. Yay, you really do.  I will not say GIF, it's not peanut butter. Okay. The Australian guy going like this, two thumbs up. All right, what else do we have over here? Let's see. Wish this had been around when I was working on Biff Frost. By Frost? By Frost. A few years back, looks really impressive for .net open source projects. Like I'm wondering if this guy's Thor. I think he might be. Okay. I think he might be. Chris Hemworth, hi. Yeah. Oh yeah. Of course. Hey, Chris. Hi for me too. Yeah, we'll say hi. All right, here's another one from John. Great to see the improvements Microsoft has made in language platform documentation. I still remember the huge stacko books from C6.0. That's a long time ago. Should have included a back brace with the product. This is pretty cool. I love the idea of being able to learn and read as you go. I'm personally a fan of notebooks. I'm so glad C-Sharp is coming to it. And the try.net stuff is really cool. So if you could give people one takeaway from your session, what would it be? It would be number one. Can it only be one or can I give two? Can you give as many as you want? Okay. This is your session. So number one, please go and try the .net try global tone. Give it a try. Make sure you're using it for your next workshop. We are looking forward to hearing how you're doing with it. We've had people try it with workshops that are pulling from Azure Functions. So I would love to see more workshops with that. Also, if you want to give the binder experience a try, let me walk through that experience one more time. One more time. So people can look at it because I had some technical issues because that's the world. So let's do that. So if you go to our GitHub repo which is .net slash try, you scroll down all our code base, you'll notice launch my binder, right? So when you launch my binder, what this is doing is that it is spinning up a container for you and you're able to actually start running and writing that code right within the browser. So it's pulling in the .net core SDK and all that kind of stuff. Now for it to even look nicer, look at it in the lab format, which I just think is always like a nicer way to look at this experience. I'm a fan. It's really cool. I just want to point out, we do have F-sharp support. I don't know if people saw that. Is that because Philip's next? Philip is next and I almost didn't tell, I didn't say it, I didn't say it. That's right. We do have F-sharp support.  There is a bug which I can fix right now. Hit run, but this has all the nice F-sharp expectations that people will have and my team will continue to work on that. Fantastic. If you look at C-sharp as well, let's go up one. Look at C-sharp, you will find two different samples. You'll have one which is the housing sample and just to give reference to this housing sample is literally pulled out of a data science book and Eric did a side by side and was able to replicate this entire experience right within the browser. And we also have a repo one, which I should have run to show you how we are actively keeping track on the issues that you're doing and we are actively trying to close them. Fantastic. Yeah, and then wait for ignite so you can start installing the bits on your machine. All right. Nice. We have another question. Is it possible to integrate try.net with doc FX documentation? Try.net and doc FX. Not at the moment now. Okay. Okay. And I think there's one more. Is it this one? Yeah. Can I take a subset of the try.net code and use it to incorporate C-sharp scripts within existing applications? Ooh, Jeremy, good question. Yes, you can. Just look at our repo and ask us questions. And here's another one with another gif. Also, it's gif, Yoda. Why is one? It says, so do what you can as there is no try. Try.net.net. Like, I love it.net.net. The cool with Jupyter notebooks. Look at that. It's like, what was the thing again? I'm trying to like parse it. This is really good stuff. Okay. So do what you can as there is no try. Try.net. The cool with Jupyter notebooks.com. I will decide for that. I think try.net is cool and we're also excited about the Jupyter notebooks experience.  Are we ready to go to the next session? Yeah, we have what's new in F-sharp with Philip. So, Philip. Now is it Philip or Phil or is it like, do I have to say it with a British accent? Philip. Oh, no.


Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for inviting me. Yes, I was the professor of Mr. Wingen. And some years ago, he couldn't escape my lectures. And now I couldn't escape his invitation. I feel really honored. And the other reason, probably, why I'm here is that some years ago, I wrote together with my co-author Ulrich Wastman this book on a Bargeld for board. And the reason why we wrote it was that we met one of the warriors on a cache, Kenneth Rogov, here at Munich University. And now for today, my task is digital cache as potential opt out from substantial negative interest rates. And there, we have to ask ourselves, well, in recent years, we see a war on cache. And this war on cache is connected, among other reasons, to make negative interest rates possible. Now the question is, is this a real threat? So do we have to think about this? Do we have to reflect it? Well, and when you look at the interest rates, I will do it very fast. Then you'll see that the main refinancing rate of the ECB is zero. Now it has been zero for several years. Yes, OK, the US has increased recently. But now it seems to be that we are on top. And the next steps might be to lower it again. At least United States has a possibility to lower interest rates. And when we are at zero, we have this topic of the zero lower bound. You cannot significantly lower interest rates below zero without facing the danger from the perspective of the banks that the deposits will be withdrawn and people will start to hoard cache in order to avoid negative interest rates. It might not happen at minus 0.2, minus 0.4, but Kenneth Rogoff, one of these warriors on cash, is talking about minus 6%. And in this case, it will be quite clear that the vast majority of depositors will go and withdraw their cash and hoard it in order to avoid these negative interest rates. So even when we look at 10-year government bond yields, they are in Germany and Japan at the moment at zero or slightly below zero. So even their long-term interest rates are coming to zero. And here we have it in the longer perspective. We also see a clear trend from 1980 to lower interest rates. Now there is a dispute going on. Is it due to the monetary policy of the central banks or is it more to lower birth rates, lower gross rates, or whatsoever? But for the topic I have to deal with, this is not so important. The simple fact is important that we are at zero or even below zero. Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard economist, former IMF economist, prepare for negative interest rates in the next recession. So and sooner or later, there will be a next recession. Larry Summers, also Harvard economics professor and secretary of finance and Bill Clinton's administration, negative interest rates might be necessary to push the economy, so to push investment and consumption. The existence of cash limits the possibility to impose negative interest rates. So and then it's quite clear if this is your conviction, then you have to advocate for the end of cash. In Germany, we have Peter Boehringer. He argues in the same direction as Rogoff and Summers. Still among German economists, he is in a minority, but the question is, will this also be the case when we have a long lasting next recession? And in January 2016, John Grein, the meanwhile former CEO of Deutsche Bank, said cash I think in 10 years time probably won't exist, there's no need for it. It is terribly inefficient and expensive. So even from this position, you'll have clear arguments against cash. When you look into the IMF working paper, I think some of you might know it from last year by Katrin Asenmacher and Siegne Grockstrup. The title was monetary policy and this negative interest rates and will this mean somehow that you have to get rid of cash? And that says in the abstract monetary policy space remains constrained by the lower bound in many countries, limiting the policy options available to address future deflationary shocks. The existence of cash prevents central banks from cutting interest rates much below zero. In this paper, we consider a practical feasibility of reason proposals for decoupling cash from electronic money to achieve a negative yield on cash which would remove the lower bound constraint on monetary policy. We discuss how central banks could design and operate such a system and raise some answered questions. So they also have an option, for example, if it's not possible to get cash away, then it would be that you have an exchange rate between cash and the deposit money. So this means that when you have 100 euros and then you come to a discount and you pay, then they say, oh, it's only 98 euros value. So because they include the negative interest. On page 19, in the same working paper, you find the quotation, another behavioral question for the transition is whether the introduction of a dual local currency system would send a crisis signal that could erode trust in the central bank and perhaps lead people to switch to other forms of currency for their payments, such as foreign currency, gold, or even cryptocurrency. We already see marginal shifts for other reasons in the types of means of payment used in many areas of the financial system. However, individuals seem to be unwilling to abandon local currency as a means of payments for most transactions. So you see they take into account that this could happen, but they still regard it as very unlikely. I would say this depends on how negative the interest rate is. If it's indeed only 0.2, 0.4, then they might be right. But I would say from 1% onwards to the negative, this won't be true anymore than a lot of people will look for alternatives. And the group of 30, a very influential group of 30 central bankers, CEOs of commercial banks and economists, they have an occasional paper. And there it says, in addition, when currency was introduced, keeping track of financial transactions and money flows was not an issue. One characteristic of cash, its largely untraceable nature, was largely irrelevant. Today, in a complex and largely global financial system, it is not. Governments and regulators have legitimate and compelling reasons, including taxation, law enforcement, and national security, to better understand money flows and financial transactions. It is no surprise that early adopters of Bitcoin were those with a reason or desire not to have their financial dealings observed by governments. Listen. OK, what are alternatives to cash? Cash of other countries, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, precious metals in coins, private currencies, barter clubs, self-sufficiency vouchers. You see, these are, in my eyes, the alternatives you can use. So lessons learned so far. There is a war on cash going on based on several motives. One warrior's motive, among others, is the absence of cash would allow to impose negative interest rates in order to boost consumption and investment. Negative interest rates are a kind of, and now this is a creation by myself. I'm somehow proud of this, Consume Verweigerung Steuer. When I used it for the first time, I checked it in Google. It didn't exist then. And then now I translated it into English for my English speeches. It's a tax on anti-consumerism. So in other words, you are a bad guy. You don't want to consume. We have to tax you. It is possible, is it possible, as a question, to escape negative interest rates by Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies? Now, people have a look at this. The answer is basically yes. So my lawyer advised me to add the basically. The answer is yes. However, governments and central banks, and central banks are a government agency, are very likely going to repress or stop these alternatives, especially when they achieve a relevant size of what we have. Now, let's assume you can use it. I expect counteractions by governments. But now let's have a look at how would it be when we use it. And I want to use a very basic economic concept, the quantity equation. So M is a quantity of money. V is a velocity of circulation. P, the price level. And T, V is a transaction volume, the quantity of output. In most cases, the transaction volume is replaced by the GDP. And somehow this is possible to replace it. But I think for what we are looking at now, we want to look at the transaction volume. Now, for those who are not familiar with economics, I want to explain it in very simple words what it is about with velocity. The velocity is the speed the money is running through the economy. When you go to the gym and you go for 30 minutes on the cross trainer, then the volume of your blood doesn't change. But the organs in your body need more oxygen. And this is achieved by a higher velocity of the blood running through your body. So this means that in the same unit of time, more oxygen is transported there. That's why the velocity is important. In most textbooks, you read that in the long run, the velocity is stable. When you look at the development of the velocity in the last 20 years, it is definitely not stable. Of course, you can always look at it in 100 years and say there's somehow an average. And indeed, from the 60s to the 80s, it was relatively stable. That's right. But from the 90s, we have a reduction in the velocity. So now let's adopt this concept. We have M and let's say it is fixed because this is especially true for a Bitcoin. This is a difference to a gold standard. So the volume of gold is increasing, I think every year by some 1.5%. But Bitcoins, this is absolutely fixed. 21 million and then it's the end. So it is fixed. Now the transaction volume. And why I'm taking here the transaction volume because especially in this period of transition when people are using more and more Bitcoin, I think it's more important to take the transaction volume here because this transaction volume will be only a small part of the whole transaction volume. And you can translate, you can connect, sorry, you can connect the transaction volume in an economy to the GDP if it is done with one currency. But here we have different currencies. That's why let's take here the transaction volume for which Bitcoins are used. So this is increasing and I think we can say it is increasing in a very strong way. So high gross rates, offset transaction volume for which Bitcoins are used. That's why two errors. Now that the equation works, we somehow have to compensate it. And the compensation, and we have heard this this morning from Torsten Polight, would be a deflationary process. Prices have to go down. You have a limited volume of money, 21 million Bitcoins. Your transaction volume is increasing. So how can you manage it? Okay, the price level is going down. And or you can compensate it by a higher velocity. The money is flowing faster. Now a higher velocity, and I'm quite convinced both will happen, price level will go down, but the money will flow faster through the economy. Higher velocity is connected to higher interest rates showing higher opportunity costs of holding money. The higher is the interest rate, the higher is the opportunity cost of holding money. Why is the velocity going down at the moment? Interest rates are very low. The opportunity costs of holding money are zero at the moment, more or less zero. Some years ago, or 10 years ago, you still got some 5 or 6% on a cash account. And now it's normally zero. So that's why the opportunity costs are low and the velocity is low. But when the interest rates go up due to the scarcity of the Bitcoins, then the interest rate will go up showing the scarcity of the Bitcoins. Interest rates and the Bitcoins system, normally in economic theory, the interest rate is connected to long-term economic growth and what is itself connected to an increase in productivity and time preference. We have heard about time preference also from Thorsten Pauli. Negative interest rates are impossible in the Bitcoins system. So this is a difference to the fired money system. No one would lend money for a negative nominal interest rate in such a system. I couldn't imagine. So probably in a discussion, if someone has another opinion, we can discuss it. This means negative nominal interest rates cannot happen in such a free-market system like the Bitcoin. So conclusion, lessons to take with you. An end of fired money's cash and its consequences will make cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin even more attractive and more expensive. Bitcoin can be used for escaping negative interest rates in the fired money. The price of Bitcoin will increase in the case of negative interest rates in the fired money system. Interest rates in the free-market Bitcoin system cannot be steered like in the fired money. So in the Bitcoin system, negative interest rates are not possible. The more Bitcoin is used, the lesser its volatility will be. This is something which is at the moment still a hurdle for someone who wants to use Bitcoin as something for saving money. Then it's really a problem if the fluctuations are so strong. But the more it is used, the lesser the volatility is going to be. Cryptocurrencies can create a separation of money and state as we already have one between church and state. Thank you very much for listening.


Hey guys, what's up, it's Kinsey and welcome back to my channel if you guys are new here. My name is Kinsey, I make lifestyle videos. I have seen this video going everywhere around YouTube. I originally said that I wasn't going to do it because I want to still like myself at the end of this video, but I feel like it's really interesting and I wanted to do it anyways. It's really been quite a journey the past week. If you guys are new here, be sure to click that subscribe button, also my Instagram and everything is linked down below. I also have a podcast that I love you so much podcast with Kinsey Elizabeth always linked below. So anyways, I wanted to do just from Monday to Friday because honestly, I don't spend that much money on weekends at all. I maybe spend like 20 bucks tops a day on weekends. I spend the most money on the weekdays because I go to school, my studio, and where I work out is all like they're all 30 minutes away from me, but in a like two mile radius. So I'm over there all the time. So I'm constantly like eating out, paying for parking, all that stuff. That's where I really rack up the money. I'm already just ready for all the hate. I actually just calculated it and it wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. I'm 22. I live in Los Angeles. Yeah, like I'm not defending myself with this, but yeah, I have no way to defend myself. I just, I'm ready for the hate to come. It's okay guys. Okay. The first two expenses that I have. I'm going to do rent and my Pilates membership. So my rent, I calculated it and I spend about $287 a week. My rent is not the worst that it is in LA. Like I am in a house. I have a roommate. I got like a really, really, really great deal in this house. So it's not the worst that it could be, but I do spend $287 a week on rent. I'm aware that there are people who spend that in a month and you know, I'm really, really jealous of you. So congratulations that unfortunately is not how it works in Los Angeles. And then I have an unlimited Pilates membership.  I don't care. I literally just don't care. You can say whatever you want. Try to get me to cancel it. No, I'm absolutely never leaving and I don't care how much, like it's just the best thing in my life. So anyways, when you do the math, that's about like $9 a day. I know it's expensive. Worth it to me. It's what I care about the most. So I don't really care.  So I think it's fine. Monday. So Monday, I got a car wash and I went to Trader Joe's. So I was working from home that day, so I wasn't eating out as much. Actually, I wasn't eating out at all. I went to Trader Joe's and that was $45 for groceries for the week. I don't know how people spend like $25 on groceries. I cook for other people a lot. So I guess I buy more food than normal, but I feel like 45 is like a pretty average amount. So I got a car wash. I got like a bigger car wash, which was $40, including tip. That's pretty standard in LA. Like a car wash is typically like $30 to $35. And then my Pilates would be $9. And so my total for Monday was $94. But I feel like actually I grocery shop and got a car wash. Like what do you expect, you know? Tuesday. So I went to Starbucks that morning. I got a free drink, which was very exciting. And then I ended up buying a perfect bar for $3.45 that I didn't even end up eating. I gave it to Quentin. I got the citrus defender. This is going to save my life. So that was $3.45 for breakfast. Parking was $4. For lunch hour, it's Trader Joe's. I got a wrap and sweet potatoes. I also vlogged this week, so if you guys are seeing kind of repetitive clips, that's why. And that was $7.98 total. Here is my Trader Joe's haul, my veggie wrap. And then I needed to get the potatoes, so I picked them up. After school, I decided to treat myself to a smoothie at Whole Foods with Dom. That was $10. Then I had to fill up my tank, which was $55. Comment down below how much it cost you guys to fill up your tank. Mine's like between $40 to $70. It can go that high if you're in that area in Los Angeles. It gets really expensive here. Dinner was $20. Oh my gosh, this is the night that we try to go to Popeyes. And then we doordashed Chick-fil-A. And it would have been more expensive, but I had doordashed credit. If you guys want $20 on doordash, I will have it linked down below. You guys give their covers, food, and delivery. Check it out. Also, I'll have my caviar code down below as well. If you guys live in LA, caviar is the best. We just doordashed Chick-fil-A. Because we didn't go to Popeyes. I don't even think I vlogged about the Popeyes experience. I don't even want to talk about it. Quinton had us wait in line for 30 minutes just to not get anything. So anyway, we... Because they wouldn't give us a plain Chick-fil-A. He is just a really picky eater. And they weren't able to give him a plain. Yeah, I get it. It's fine. So we doordashed Chick-fil-A, which is great. So if you guys want to use my doordash code, it'll be linked down below. OK, and then again, Pilates was $9. Did I get a Celsius that night? No, I didn't. All right, guys, I'm currently changing. I'm just wearing a set from set active. So total for Tuesday was $189. And what? No, $89.43. I definitely timed that wrong. OK, all right. Moving on to Wednesday. So Wednesday, I went to Blue Bottle and I spent $15 with Tip. I got, we just finished divos. It was really incredible. Got some matcha. Blue Bottle matcha was amazing, but they just raised their prices, which sucks, but whatever. I do have a grievance with this. Apparently, Blue Bottle just raised their prices, $0.75 a drink. And I basically sold my sold to Blue Bottle, so I was like, whatever, I'm still going to go. And I literally, $15 with Tip, was I bought my friend coffee. And then I got an iced matcha with oat milk. And it was like $12.76. And then I tipped. That is so expensive for two drinks. That's really bad. So I recognized that that's not good. And I just don't know what to do, because I just don't see myself stopping going to Blue Bottle anytime soon. I think I can cut it down. But it's just like, that's not good. Parking, I spent $8.00. Dinner, parking is really what I really add up, because I am in meters all the time. And I'm just like, oh, $2.00, whatever, $2.00 here and there. But $2.00 here and there really adds up, guys. Dinner, I went to Sweet Green and I spent $14.00. Sweet Green Salads are, I get $14.00 and a salad is really expensive. But if you've ever gone to Sweet Green, you understand that. You know the Hollywood rule, I'm not gonna eat mine right now, but it's just the best salad. I said this in every vlog. I think I get one, I honestly only get like one a week, but still, it's like a $14.00 salad. So, you know. Get the bread, preach yourself. Yeah, get the bread. I feel like this whole video is me just like defending myself. But one, keep in mind people at LA is very expensive. And two, basically LA is just very expensive. Okay, Pilates, $9.00. So Wednesday, the total was $46.00, which is better than Monday in two seconds. Thursday, I went to Pilates, again, $9.00. Celsius, I got a Celsius at Pilates, which is $3.00. I normally bring Celsius because they sent me a bunch, but I'm currently out of them, so now I'm buying them at Hot Pilates again, which is $3.00. But they're just like so good. The Kiwi Guava one is next level. Parking, I spent $9.00 in total. Breakfast, I got for free at Starbucks with my rewards. Coffee, I got a coffee for $3.50. On break, during class, I went and I worked at Bluestone and I got an iced americano with oat milk. That's my new coffee order. And then for dinner, I went to Zinc and I spent $25.00 with tip. Okay, so we're at Zinc. I just got my favorite meal in LA. The chicken, my bowl's so good. First we got a burger. Morgan got an assortment of things. What is inside? So, that total was $49.50. Friday, which was today, I'm home. Okay, so I went to Pilates, or no, Pilates would be $9.00. Starbucks, $7.83. I went this morning, got a pumpkin cold brew, sweet cream cold brew, very good. I'm normally not into sugary drinks and I'm very into it. Oh, and then I got a breakfast sandwich. Today, for every meal, I'm eating at home and then tonight, I know that I'm gonna spend $7.00 on parking because we're going to the mall and it's $7.00 in parking. So total today, I spent $23.83. When I don't leave my home, I'm happier and I spend less money is basically when I've come to the conclusion of. My total for what I spent this week was $324.76. I feel like that could be a lot worse. I feel like I've watched some of these videos and they're way more, but with rent, it is $611.76. Again, I feel like I've seen worse. I've seen better, but I have also seen worse. My biggest defense is I live in LA and I do everything 30 minutes in my house, but in all seriousness, I am trying to be better about finances and not spending too much money out. So I'm actually going to download Natalie Marbu's like budget spreadsheet. I'm very excited for that and really getting on into that in the new year. So that is it for my what I spend in a week video in LA. If you guys are watching these and you're looking to live in LA, you can definitely spend way less than me, clearly. You don't need to eat out. You don't need to buy the coffees. You don't need to go do all of that stuff and you can also get cheaper rent, but this is what works for me right now. You know, we can all grow and get better. But I love you guys so much. Hope you guys enjoyed this video. I'm afraid to look at the comments because I feel like I'm going to be killed, but I love you guys. My Instagram, everything is linked down below. Hope you guys have the best day ever and I will see you soon. Bye.