ఉక్య్నినినిలుని Giovanna Manchester City న్లఖాలినినిదినాంది నొంపెస్య్వా ఍లాస్లిందివానారందరంయా. ఉవనానున్నినిక్ప్లుకిదింది. ఆసాముప్సద్థడ్త్ముని అఆబిషిం గాయుత్న్నాందిందుర్చిస్ట్ని స్ర్దామునాక్మన్న్టూదున్దాంద్నినికిక్త్త్ట్చిలరైమునికు. ఩నకటంతీమతీద Kommentare offset మారెలౌచీరీ , దినిర్లేచ ప్లోెయకూచినంది νằake గ 201చూగటనంని ఻ఏచూతికికావసరం a చపినరకికి ప్నంид చ్వినెకీన్౔ Gi GN  2023 টੰকী ব���রা genomবি ী৉রো ইলে আরি কবিবি কেরররর বিবি ফরি কেররো জিরে কোরররর আসাররর উারে কেরর আসারর পববব খ্বব বিররর ত্রররব � వానిన గోటోన్నిందికి సివాచోధడికటి, పనియావాచేనీతికి సిసలిని, మతందికి మౕికికి�ハిసాకాట్కి, ఆస్ల్ వాండెయానికి మధవిరంకికికిక �� ʕʟʔa ʕ�色 ʔᵌʔʕʔʒ' ʔʟʀʜolʔʔʒ' ʔʕʔʀʟʒ' ʔʔʀʔʔʚʔʟʜʔ ʔʟʟʔʔʔʔʔʔʖʔʟʖʔʔʖʔʔʔʔʒ' ʔʟʟʔʔʔʔʔʙʔʚʔʔʔʔʔʔ' 주ʔʔʝʔʖʔʔʔʔʚʔʔʕʔʔʔʚʔʔʚʔʔʔʔʔʟʔʔʚ� the signing has. It's really one of the best but I believe now Ronald is more mature, he's using more of his head, not his physics. So I believe the impact is going to have in that team and especially working with a serious striker like Cavani. I believe and then now the kind of creativity that we have in the midfield with the likes of Bruno Fernandez, Paul Pogba, we have Sancho in the wing. If you bring those crosses, Ronald will help them, Cavani can help them. So I believe goals are not, it's not going to be one of the problem that Man United will be having. So we really need to work, I think Centre Bank is where we had a problem, again we have a serious signing in Verane. So I don't see any area where we have weakness which you can say might cost the team. Although I believe in terms of holding midfielder is where maybe they might need a bit of reinforcement but I believe the team itself it's compact enough and it can deliver. Personally I'm looking forward to the bashing and banter that Man United will receive when they lose again, against a little non-primary side with Cristiano Ronaldo inside the match. What might have contributed this man to make a return and don't opt for the team that we all knew that he will join maybe City. Alex Fagason intervention, is there any possibility that it might have been critical? Yeah I think that's it because Fagason was one of those managers who really took rivalries and loyalty on a serious level and even put it to some of his players who got that from him, the class of 92, those guys they really got that from him about loyalty and obviously when he saw that Ronaldo, his greatest product from Man United was going to City, he was obviously shocked and had to call him. I read that he called him, he convinced him to sign for United and not for City because that would have been a disgrace to whatever he was trying to do with him and he made the right decision at the end and you just go through social media, you look at all the current United players, they are really excited to have Cristiano in the team, everyone was posting pictures of him, they really wanted a guy like this, it's a huge moral booster to the whole team. And it looks like my hopes this particular afternoon are doomed to fail because Ilkay Gundogan has already scored a goal on 7th minute for Manchester City against Arsenal. They are playing at home, right? City are the home team and you know how City can get marauding in presence of their supporters. Do we expect a score that is embarrassing here? No, I believe what is important is the three points and when you look at the two teams, I think considering that City started losing and they are the defending champion in their first match in the league, I believe they are more serious, they are more focused and they have much, much deeper depth than Arsenal and I don't think, I don't expect that the three points or anything less than three points from City because I believe they are more serious and they know also with the kind of signings that United has done, what Chelsea has done, what Liverpool has, I believe they know you don't lose these kind of matches and you really need to pick these points as fast as possible so that when it comes to those big matches, when you are playing those big teams, then you are in a safe place where if you don't get the three points, you can get one, if you lose, it's not a disaster but now I don't know, we like this banter between Man United and Arsenal fans but now Arsenal seems to be playing like Minos, those small teams which looks weird and I don't know, the Arsenal fans who are diehard now, I don't know how they are feeling because they don't look very motivated because even them, they are not so hopeful, first it's the first time that Arsenal is missing from European scene, they don't have any European engagement this year and then now locally where now you thought they are going to focus 100% in the local league and then they have started very badly so I don't know how it will be our engagement with the Arsenal fans but I believe that it's the only hope they might have who used to try and now formally we used to talk about Top 4, they used to take Top 4 as maybe their trophy, now Top 6 is a problem and when you are off air, you guys were talking about how Miguel Arteater might not survive the entire season, Ken why do you think he will get fired, is it because of a string of poor results at the helm? Yeah the poor results and I also like the signings he made, I don't think the signings which are going to really improve that team, you know when you really want to compete with the Top 6, you have to behave like a Top 6 club and splash the money, everyone else can do that but Arsenal really they were given the chance, they spent almost on 50 million on 3 players who really are not world class, they are still young, they are not going into a team full of world class, they are not superstars, they are not serial winners so when you look at guys like Lukaku coming into Chelsea, they are coming to win the Premier League, they went to enter to win Serie A, they did it, they have come to win the Premier League, Cristiano Greenlich moved to win the Premier League but they are good players, guys like they signed Lokonga, who was a great talent, many clubs were looking at him but they were signing him to anchor that midfield and which again showed lack of experience at times and you bring a more inexperienced player in and also they signed the left back Tavares where they have quarantined, those signings were not improved Arsenal needed to go for proper established 26-27 year olds who are coming to help the team move back into Top 6 first and then back to the Champions League but that won't be the case and Mikkel might end up losing his job because of the players available to him actually and away from Premier League, let's discuss about UEFA Champions League draw happened in midweek Barcelona and Bayern are in the same pool and so is Manchester City and they are French money back compatriots PSG after the departure of Lionel Messi from Barcelona nowadays people tend not to see them as favourites for the European club competition yeah yeah especially they have Bayern who have really done nothing with their squad they only had quality and Buss have lost Lionel Messi someone who you know when you look at the rest the remaining guys PK, Busquets, Alba they are three ageing guys but the rest of the other players are new and haven't won a lot of trophies you know they are still a young squad with the jailing and Bayern are just experienced you know monsters, they might go through them again but that was the draw everyone had to see the big teams playing against big teams, Manchester City versus PSG especially and this time United got lucky in the draw, we didn't draw a big, a really big team we only have to get past Villarreal, Atalanta, it was a better draw than last season but obviously the eyes will be on City, PSG and Barcelona Bayern what's your group of death amongst all the pools? I don't know, the ones Bayern and the ones for PSG looks very competitive but again now those two teams you expect them to go through you don't expect any of those to not make it through so I believe things will get hot in the next stage where now when you get to knock out phase there are teams you don't want to meet the likes of PSG, PSG are the favourites this season especially with Messi Messi you know he used to look at his name and sometimes you decide to misspell it knowingly and call him Messiah because that guy is special there is no doubt as much as I support Man United and Messi is a class with Ronaldo Menfi is deep eye the Dutchman after joining Barcelona said that he hoped to meet Messi so that at least they could get to know each other in goal and clock but during his first training session that was when Messi was appearing to beat goodbyes to his former teammates and leave it's very unfortunate he really disappointed some of those and you also know Kun Agüero has also gone to Bacca and he was saying that he felt like also coming out if Messi is leaving I think most of people are attracted by Messi most contributing factor for him to join Barcelona was to play with Messi so Messi now playing at PSG with the other stars who are there the likes of Ambarpe, the likes of Neymar it's like what we used to have with Real Madrid the Galacticos those are the big stars although there are some concerns that Ambarpe might leave and join Real Madrid but I believe this season I think it's PSG to lose as much as I support Man United you have to appreciate what PSG has done with their money they have collected all the best players try to put them together the problem is Potecino will be able to make them jail and play as a team and get the right results so that at least they are able to win the trophy which they have spent so much money trying to look for someone was saying that there is much depth inside PSG's court but whatever they are lacking now is the manager to he has not proven himself at that level those players because they seem to have sealed all the loopholes in almost every department the defence is bringing in Sergio Ramos and in midfield they brought who Genie Final down yes and now attacking wise they are very sharp but now news of Kilian Ambarpe leaving PSG to join Real Madrid does the Frenchman wants to be a star of his own he doesn't want to live in the shadows of other players I think wherever you go you will always be in the shadow of Messi or Ronaldo if you go to Real Madrid you can't really replace what Ronaldo did Mbappe is a great player but I don't think he can hit the same heights Ronaldo did because also the guys Ronaldo had in that team most of them are aged right now most of them are almost done guys like Ramos have left Modric and Cruz I think they only have a few years left at Real then they go so he really has to work extra hard for him to hit the heights of Ronaldo at Real Madrid and also for him to leave PSG where they have a chance to win everything they have the best squad every manager wants a squad like PSG they have the best squad in Europe right now and you want to leave I don't think it will be a right decision for him he still has a year left he can go for that here and then move clubs but right now if I were him I would stay at PSG God the season with Messi and see how it goes Ferran Torres has scored the second goal for Manchester City 12th minute as we speak City leading by two goals to Neal against Arsenal oh my goodness this is expected to be a landslide no and again when I asked him yesterday about his availability this afternoon because I knew as a football enthusiast maybe he will be catching an action he said no no no that one is expected it's out come you should get it same with scoring goals this is bad because now it means now you really Arsenal have to now try and maintain that score to be respectable it's not about winning or getting a result of this match it's trying to maintain the score being respectable because otherwise City can easily give you high five or six and this weekend I saw Bayern scoring 12th goals in a match and when you concede those many goals you cannot be competing at big names of EPL and you are being hammered six five but it's very easy for City to beat you six if you are not careful otherwise they really to the problem with Arsenal they want to play good football going toe-to-toe with the best like City and they don't have that score which can be able to do that so I think it's going to be tough for them they need to shut a bit so that they minimize the number of goals they are going to concede they are going to have their you know their interrogation zone I think they are number nineteen in the league at the moment they are not going to come out of there in the next two three matches so it's a problem they need to maintain keep this score the way it is if they have to concede they concede just one more but it's not good it is a packed day as far as English Premier League is concerned because several matches are lined up this particular afternoon City as we speak right now currently leading by two goals against Arsenal something that probably was expected other matches that are expected to happen of course later on at the tail end Liverpool will be playing host to Chelsea what is expected to be a pulsating clash my friend Wanjalash Yundu who is an Arsenal die-hard has just got into the studio very late and he is a Chelsea supporter you know nowadays when you confuse someone for an Arsenal supporter they might see you for for defamation of course let's take a short break then we will come back as we wind up the short three o'clock for the last man in my director can allow me to do this


Bungie were present on InsideXbox at Gamescom and revealed some great new additions to the game come Shadowkeep. More about artifacts, a new exotic, new mods and much more. Today we cover it all. How's it going guys? My name's DPJ and I'd like to thank you for stopping by and checking out my video. If you do enjoy it, leave it a like. It really helps out and if you are new around here and want to see more of what you are seeing be sure to subscribe. Okay so firstly let's check out a new exotic to the game. This is for the Hunter when it's called the Assassin's Cowl. It's an exotic how me and while it looks absolutely amazing that's for sure. But check out it's intrinsic perk, Vanishing Execution. Defeating a Guardian with a melee attack or a combatant with a finisher grants invisibility and restores a portion of health and shields.  I love it. It's about time a Hunter's got something useful. Yes I'm kidding by the way. But yeah this does look quite decent I'm not going to lie. Okay so let's move on to the new information on Finisher's we got. So we know Finisher's are used to basically finish off your enemies of your size or slightly bigger anything just below a boss and they do this for a special animation. When you get an enemy down to a certain percentage of health, a symbol will appear above their head and they will glow slightly. This indicates you can finish them. There are different class oriented finisher's and everyone will get 3 with Shadow Keep. You can also spam your finisher but you can also still take damage while doing these finisher's. Finisher's as well also have specific mods in your setter which can be beneficial. Like this one mod right here and is available on your artifact. It's called Thundercoil and it grants bonus damage for all arc, melee abilities and refunds super energy on finisher final blows. And this one heavy finisher. Finisher's generate heavy ammo. Requires 1 half of your super energy. Interesting what I can also confirm is this particular mod also generates heavy for your allies too. Very cool indeed. Okay so let's next talk about something else not mentioned. They are Anti-Barrier round mods and Overload round mods. These are new and were exclusively revealed via the streams. So for a brief second we saw 2 options on a hand cannon via the mod Socket. These are then equipped via unlocking them on the artifact. Now there is something else available to slot into this mod socket for hand cannons but they don't reveal what this is. We can see at the bottom of the screen. The Anti-Barrier rounds we do get a glimpse of for the hand cannons, auto rifles and SMGs do the following. Piercing rounds designed to bypass combatant defences strong against barrier champions. We do see another perk for auto rifles and SMGs too called Overload rounds. Uninterrupted fire grants bullets that cause disruption, delaying ability, regeneration and lowering combatant damage output. Strong against Overload champions. Very interesting indeed people. Now I'm going to do a little more research into the artifact and bring you another video later on today with that so stay tuned for it. Moving on and we see a new mod called Nightmare Hunt. This one in particular is called Servitude and it's on the moon. But there are others here too. This one states defeat the Nightmare of Zidron, the Gate Lord. Zidron if you remember was a unique vex minotaur unit that protects the endless steps on Venus. Now I guess these nightmares will be where we see and encounter many of the old enemies we have seen throughout the Shadowkeep trailer so I look forward to that. We also see these Nightmare Hunt modes have three new named difficulties, a Depth Hero and Legend all adding various modifiers with legend adding up to six modifiers like damn. We also see a new strike on the moon called Scarlet Keep. And last thing to cover people, we get a quick glimpse at the Monte Carlo scene here in the Hunter's inventory. I mean we all knew it was returning but here is people at first glimpse inside the inventory in the game. But yeah guys besides that we didn't get much more information. It was mainly about the finishers and how they impacted us as players playing the game. But on that note we have commented at the end of the video. If you guys enjoyed it leaving a like really helps out. If you are new around to and enjoy daily deaths in the videos be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I upload you can turn notifications on by hitting that bell button. But guys thanks as always for stopping by hopefully you enjoyed the video and hopefully I will see you on that next one.


So, I wanted to take some time to expand upon one of the more underrated tweets in my opinion that came following the news about Roe v. Wade being overturned. And this is a tweet from actor Samuel L. Jackson who took to Twitter to call out Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for not stating whether or not he believes the court should also revisit Loving v. Virginia. Now for those of you who don't know, Loving v. Virginia is the Supreme Court case that shrugged down bans on interracial marriages. This is a very important case. Now the reason why Clarence Thomas is being asked this question by Samuel L. Jackson is because in his concurring opinion to the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the Dobbs case, Clarence Thomas explicitly called for the court to revisit cases with regard to contraception, same-sex intimacy, marriage equality. So he actually name-dropped Griswold v. Connecticut, Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges. So he's saying the court should also look at these decisions because these two, like Roe, were wrongly decided. Now when Clarence Thomas says that we should revisit cases like Obergefell, he's not explicitly saying it's because he thinks that gay marriage is immoral and God doesn't want this to be a thing. He's saying that these were wrongly decided. As the Supreme Court Justice, you can't actually say we should rule one way or another based on your religious preference. You have to rule based on the Constitution. So Clarence Thomas is forced to make a constitutional argument and he's saying that we have to revisit these cases because they violate the Constitution. They were wrongly decided. But the reason why that doesn't make sense is because the cases like Obergefell v. Hodges, they used the same constitutional rationale as the case of Loving v. Virginia. In Loving, the justices held that bans on interracial marriages violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. And in Obergefell, the court also held that the 14th Amendment required states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. In fact, in the Obergefell case, it cites Loving again and again and again. And the reason why they cite Loving is because that case makes it very clear that their right to marriage is fundamental to the U.S. Constitution and it cannot be denied on the basis of race or sex and sexual orientation. Therefore, it logically follows that if you believe that Obergefell was wrongly decided because the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution does not give same-sex couples the right to marry, then you also have to assume that that same 14th Amendment wouldn't give interracial couples the right to marry as well. But Thomas did not call for the court to revisit Loving v. Virginia. And the reason is because he himself is in an interracial marriage, as many of you have heard about. In fact, he's married to a demonic-possessed insurrectionist named Ginny Thomas. I believe it's pronounced Jenae Thomas. And they make a really cute couple. So I understand why he wouldn't want to have his own marriage overruled. But you have to understand this is the problem, right? He's right to not want to strike down interracial marriages. But he's applying a different standard to two different cases that have been decided using the same logic and that is inconsistent. He's inadvertently revealing that he is just basing his decision, his desire to overturn or revisit Obergefell to overturn it on his religious preference, not on the Constitution. Because if he was actually consistent, he would say we have to revisit all of these cases that used the 14th Amendment to drastically expand rights, but he's not doing that. And this is a problem. This is a problem that Samuel L. Jackson is pointing out. But to be fair, it's not just Clarence Thomas, who is a hypocrite here. It's all of the Supreme Court justices. But Clarence Thomas, he was a little bit too brazen. He called for the court to revisit several cases, but yet he's conspicuously leaving out another case that you'd think would be grouped in with these other cases that he wants the court to revisit. So the question is, does he even have a judicial philosophy that he adheres to or see just using his religion to interpret the Constitution? The answer is he actually does have a judicial philosophy. And that judicial philosophy is to own the libs. Now you might think that I'm being facetious, but literally, this is something that he stated a very long time ago. He said that his goal as a Supreme Court justice is to make liberals miserable and be on the court for as long as he possibly can. And that's perhaps the one area where Clarence Thomas has been consistent. As Insider explained, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told his law clerks he intended to serve on the highest court of the land to make the lives of liberals miserable according to a 1993 report from the New York Times. In a conversation with his law clerks two years following his confirmation, the New York Times reported Thomas expressed his desire to serve on the court until the year 2034. Quote, the liberals made my life miserable for 43 years.  And just to remind you, this spiteful, petty, vengeful individual isn't just some random adult. Like I wouldn't expect this sort of behavior of any adult, but this is a Supreme Court justice. And I'd argue that he's been pretty successful at not just making liberals miserable, but everyone in the country miserable because it doesn't matter what the state is. Most people do not want to see Roe v. Wade overturned. Now, if you look at the public opinion polls regarding marriage equality, the overwhelming majority of Americans believe that marriage equality should remain the law of the land. But Clarence Thomas, he's not in favor of that. So part of his judicial philosophy certainly encompasses his religion, but on top of that, it's also a little bit of owning the libs as well. And it's not a stretch to say that because he quite literally has governed in that exact way.  But actually they don't really believe anything. They're just making it up. This is what I mean. This is the point that Samuel L. Jackson, I think is making here. Because if Clarence Thomas was genuinely interested in interpreting the Constitution in an objective way, he wouldn't just call for a Bergfell and Lawrence and Griswold to be overturned because he thinks that they inappropriately apply the 14th Amendment. He'd also call for loving the Virginia to be revisited as well. But Clarence Thomas actually did us all a favor by admitting that he is inconsistent here and he doesn't really care about anything other than his religion and his own the libs philosophy. So that's why that tweet from Samuel L. Jackson was really important. Not only because the celebrity has a huge platform and can expose the hypocrisy, but because what Samuel L. Jackson is doing here is opening the doors to a really important conversation that I want people to have, and that is the Supreme Court justices.  Has there been Supreme Court justices in the past that have been fairly consistent? Sure. I mean, I disagree with a lot of what she had to say, but I think that Sandra Day O'Connor, for the most part, was trying her best to apply some sort of judicial philosophy. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, maybe you can argue that as well. Scalia disagree with him, but he was fairly consistent in his textualism. And I disagree with, you know, this interpretation of the Constitution, but he at least tried to remain consistent and said, yes, you can burn the flag. That's free speech. But individuals like Clarence Thomas would just pick and choose what they like and don't like and then apply some judicial rationale to it. And that's unacceptable. That's why the court is illegitimate. That's why Americans have no faith in this court.  Do you enjoy watching independent news shows like the Humanist Report, the Rational National and the Majority Report, but oftentimes YouTube doesn't deliver our videos to your subscription box? Well, I've got a solution for you. It's called the Optout app available right now in the iOS app store coming soon to Android. Optout is an app made by and for progressives where they take all of the most popular independent news shows and they put them in one convenient location. You'll find all your favorites on there like the Humanist Report, the Rational National, the Majority Report and the app is updated multiple times per day, so your news feed is constantly up to date. If you enjoy watching independent media, this is the app to get downloaded today.


of materials and stuff so we're trying to think if we can get we can get um sort of experience so we're thinking of having us sort of rock show with the music and then some people that can jam with the music so what you can see here right now is um anyone here any marvel fans here no okay so um uh there was a recent movie called um Thor of course we don't want to just uh use the music or just in notes right so we want to hack it so we want to write it in python as well so uh i'm using uh fax dot um uh application here and maybe can so it's uh it's a software that uh can convert your python code into um sound so you can check the uh change the instruments so zero always for snare i can stop it and then uh play oops so something like that so we tried to get the scores for a portion of uh the music from Led Zeppelin and then have the drums like this um and then you can add also some of the instruments for it like the bass part right and then you can try to add back the so like i do the can turn off the voice and then just back to the snare drum so of course the concert wouldn't be complete without the people right so my friends here will talk about the people in the concert yeah so obviously it's not a rock concert if you don't have a march fit and people dancing and people bang the hits with music right okay so what we have is a small battery car robot with some servos that we hope down in some very enthusiastic dancers all right can we give a round of applause to our very enthusiastic dancers all right so unfortunately we wanted to get the dancers to sync up with the music all right but and you know if you wanted to hook up the bass and logic bit and we tried like microsoft or google stuff but we couldn't so we're going to use the most advanced new old network we have all right it's called the human brain okay so if we have our DJ up all right we are going to play oh yeah and of course we are going to we need the mc to kill us so we're going to use uh some voice commands to take help us sync us up all right okay go lock always break it down let's show them how they do it is let's dance the unfortunately you couldn't program the food down to gmail so uh let's actually we'll be coming ourselves so yeah so yeah that's all we have and thank you and thank you so much for coming uh we didn't introduce our names so that's Paul and Jo Paul na and we are from the red norong hate partners i feel like this and the farting can make a bit of a nervous thing to come aboard the party we need a super city concert right after party i mean after this okay let's go skate to you come on up come on up dancing i'll just burn


In my last video, I shuffled my classification data and still managed to get excellent results from my classifier. So, here's what I did. First, I loaded the iris dataset and randomized the class labels. Second, I quickly plotted the data just to make sure it looked messy enough. Then third, I used this data, let's call it our training data, to develop a classification tree. And finally, I fed that same data to the predictions widget and took a look at the results with the distributions widget. Now, these mostly accurate results hint that machine learning works like magic and can devise great models even if input data is messy and the class labels are in chaos. Now, what I did is of course wrong. I made the predictions on the same data I used for training. And to understand why this is a huge problem, let's take a look at the tree I've created. Remember, the one I trained on the original iris dataset was small and simple. On the other hand, opening the tree viewer now, I see this monstrosity. Wow, 97 nodes and 49 leaves. This tree is huge, especially considering the data consists of only 150 instances. Also, as you can see as I scroll back and forth, most of the leaves contain just a couple of instances. Now, on this randomized data, the tree cuts the feature space into small pieces with only a few instances, usually of the same class. In doing this, it remembers all the data from the training set. So, when we use such a classification tree to make predictions on the same training data, it performs well simply because it has seen it already. Now, I can push this idea even further by removing any forward pruning. Remember, I discussed forward pruning in my last video. Now, this way, the tree gets even bigger, 163 nodes and 82 leaves. In the distributions widget, I can now see that nearly all the predictions on the training data are correct. There are only two misclassifications. Using these results to measure the accuracy of a model would however be way too optimistic, as it favors models that remember everything and completely overfade the data. Obviously, I should be testing my models on separate data sets, not the ones I use for training. So, let's first try this out on my randomized data. With the correct testing procedure, I expect the accuracy of my model to be very poor. Here we go. I'll remove the scatter plot from my workflow first and replace it with the data sampler. Now, by default, I should get 70% of the data on its output. So, I'll feed this sample to the tree widget, turn pruning back on, and then test the resulting model on the remaining 30% of my data. Now, in order to do this, I'll have to link the remaining data output from the sampler to the predictions widget. So, this is my new workflow. Remember, I'm training the tree on the training data comprising of 70% of my initial data set, then testing it on the remaining 30%. So, this time, the distributions widget shows the tree made a lot of errors. Just like I expected. Bad data with randomized class labels mean the tree is basically making random predictions. But notice that I only observed this poor performance because I used a separate test data set that was not included in the training data set to estimate errors. Now, I can make one more modification to my workflow. I'll remove the randomization to estimate the accuracy of a classification tree on the original IRIS data set. So, again, I'll assess the accuracy on a separate test set. Now, removing the randomized widget and connecting the data directly to the data sampler, let's take another look at our results in distributions. Okay, this time the tree made only two mistakes, confusing virginicas and versicolors. These misclassifications are presented clearly in a confusion matrix, which I'll add to the output of the predictions widget. Note the two items that highlight our misclassifications not on the diagonal. Now, the main takeaway of this video is that you should always estimate accuracy on fresh data and never do so on the data used to train a model. But one problem still needs to be solved. Especially with smaller data sets, accuracy estimates can heavily depend on the randomness of splitting data. So, we'll have to figure out which samplings to consider and which estimates to report. But we'll talk about that in our next video.


Okay, we're back. This is Dell Storage Forum 2012. We're live. This is theCUBE, SiliconANGLE.TV's continuous production of Dell Storage Forum. I'm Dave Vellante of wikibond.org and I'm here with my co-host, Stu Miniman. Stu, we've been here all week. We've got a great guest on now. Howard Marks is also known as Deep Storage Net. That's his Twitter handle. He's a technical expert. He knows storage. He's a consultant of many Fortune 500 companies. He's been in the storage business for a long, long time and now is an independent analyst, blogger, journalist, slash all of the above. Howard, welcome to theCUBE. Thanks, Dave. Glad to be here. So, we're here at Dell Storage Forum. This is the second year that we've been here and we've been talking about the theme of the transformation of Dell, going from kind of what I called on Twitter, Car Dealer, Car Maker, meaning owning a lot of their own IP. You've seen that transformation. What do you make of it? I'm really impressed. First of all, Dell has managed to do acquisitions a lot better than other people in the storage industry have. They've took on Equalogic and when they took on Equalogic, they had a lot of channel conflict problems because for 15 years before that, they were all about disintermediation and selling direct to the customer and Equalogic was a channel driven company and several of their resellers just said, we're not dealing with Dell, you're an evil empire trying to put us out of business. But yesterday was channel day here and there were 350 resellers. Many of them had sold Equalogic and stopped selling Equalogic and then came back when they discovered Dell could manage that. Dell bought Ocarina and Exanet when they were basically infants before there was a substantial installed base and said, this is very interesting technology but it's not really a product. Let's see what we can do about rolling that in and incorporating it with our other acquisitions and some of the other folks in the storage business at best acquire companies and continue to sell the products that they've already been making and some of the others acquire products and kill them off because they just don't know how to do the acquisition business. So I'm very impressed with Dell's progression from that disintermediation into a real supplier of storage. Yeah overnight they have become relevant in the storage market when you agree as opposed to sort of not that Dell was irrelevant before but they were a channel. They resold some stuff under OEM, they resold the Clarion line, they occasionally sold a Symmetric because they had the intro into the customer but they were box pushers. They were essentially resellers in the storage business and now they bought Ecologic which is the best product in that market where ease of use is the number one thing you have to worry about and they bought Compellent which is a second generation mid-range array and have managed to not annoy people. I mean I remember going to C Drive, Compellent's user conference that this is essentially the replacement for and being amazed that Compellent's customers were the happiest campers I ever met. Nobody had major complaints except this feature isn't in the product. Nobody ever said you know it broke and they never fixed it for me which you know as you know when you see a thousand of customers somebody said with something. Yeah or the user interface stinks or there's a laundry list of complaints on the to-do list. Right. And you never heard that from Compellent customers. I had the same experience. I went to C Drive but I interviewed a lot of Compellent customers and I would ask them you know what's on the to-do list, what aren't you happy about, what doesn't work and silence. Yeah. Now you saw that, actually saw that a lot from the most sort of more modern you know virtualization, right, storage virtualization companies. Okay so let's get into it. Let's start with Flash. Flash is a hot area. It's something that you've really been studying deeply. I know you're right in the middle of a big study on Flash. We saw one of the greatest wealth creations in the history of the storage industry you know leading up to I guess the Isilon acquisition, right. We saw Equalogic and Left Hand and 3PAR and Compellent and Isilon and Data Domain. Right. I mean just huge valuations of these companies that got taken out by the whales. Yeah but none of that compared to the Extreme I.O. And then so my question is now you're starting to see companies with no product in the market. Right. You know really no marketing per se, no channel, no install base, sell for 400 plus million dollars. Just a really good idea. Yeah. And the set of engineers and enough of an implementation to say yeah that's a really good idea and it's going to work. Really smart engineers, right. But what's happening here? Are we going to see a repeat of the storage virtualization frothiness? Is it going to be bigger? I think we're going to see that. So you know traditionally we've thought about storage costs in terms of capacity. It's been dollars per gigabyte and that's really all we cared about. And Flash because the economics of Flash are completely different. Flash is very expensive per gigabyte but it's cheap per IOP turns that set of economics on its head. And now we have to think about not dollars per gigabyte but dollars per IOP for performance. And just like in the 70s we made on the mainframe the transition from doing work on tape to doing work on disk and tape for secondary storage. We're at the beginning of that same phase where we're going to do work in Flash and we're going to have disk for secondary storage. And we now need to automate that process. We need to find a way that we're going to have Flash provide the performance that Flash provides. Disk provide the lower cost capacity and lesser performance. And may have that all be relatively transparent to our users. So the other thing if I may, Stu, if I want to get your technical perspective and market perspective on for the last 15, 20 years we've seen function, critical function move out of the host, you know, outside the other side of the channel to the sand. Right Stu? Yeah, I know. So if I can, that's actually where I'm going with it, Dave. So one of the interesting things that I think and we've had this discussion is the transition and adoption of Flash. It's not one solution because we saw disco from kind of DAS to a storage array. And Flash today, it can be in the server. It can be more of an appliance. And there's even value putting it in the storage array. So there's there's it can be in lots of places. There's lots of ways to use it. But the thing about Flash is it's complicated by comparison to a disk drive. A disk drive is a relatively simple thing. You can read and write at the same, you know, it reads and writes at the same speed. Every time you move the heads, it takes time. You can read and write the same block over and over again without it wearing out. Flash, you can do random IO actually a little bit faster than you can do sequential IO, but you have to be really careful about managing rights because rights take longer. And rights are destructive. There's only so many page array cycles you can run a block through. So you have to look at your workloads more differently, more exactly, determine what kind of flash you're going to use and where you're going to put it. Right now I'm working on a report about using Flash in the server to accelerate access to shared storage. And that's part of the counter trend to what Dave was just talking about till two years ago. The trend was move storage functionality out of the host into the array. And so even things like volume managers and software raid and mirroring all faded away and we started pushing that out to the host. But VMware has started sucking those things back into vSphere. We've got now some storage. You'll be pushing it out to the sand. Yeah. Pushing it out to the array. Yeah, yeah. Right. But VMware is reversing that. Right. So you have storage IO control and storage vMotion so that you can have the host manage where some of that data goes. Plus, the closer you can get your storage to the processor, the less latency there is. Yeah. So if we look at HPC and big data and some of those other applications. Right. Where you say we'll distribute all the storage, we'll distribute all the compute. Everybody will have access to their chunk. It's all about sharding. But even in the more generalized compute environment where we say, well, you know, my Oracle server is running slow. And it's running slow because it's waiting for the disk. So I can introduce flash to speed that up. And I can introduce flash to speed that up as part of the disk array. I can introduce flash to speed that up somewhere in the sand between the disk array and the server. Or I can insert that flash right in the server. And there's the Fusion IO solution where we put the flash in the server and we use it as DAZ. But that's got all sorts of limitations around clustering that you, now that storage is owned by that server. And if something goes wrong with that server, it's not available anymore. If we add a software layer and we say we're going to have that flash in that server, we're going to get the 100 microsecond latency talking to that flash. But it's just going to be a cache. And we're still going to have backend storage. We're still going to use the backend storage for snapshots. We're still going to do server offloaded backups via VStorage API or some kind of snapshot management. That's a combination that makes a lot of sense to me. So we're seeing the functional shift back toward the server as a result of the catalyst of VMware. So let's handicap the horses on the track. What does that mean, that functional shift for traditional storage companies like an EMC or a NetApp? And does that mean that server companies in theory should be able to take greater advantage of that? Do you see an EMC make some moves? It means that there's plays for everybody. It opens up the field. It also opens up the field for startups because if I can do storage IO control and storage of Emotion, then I don't need to have a big monolithic array that has multiple tiers of performance. If the host is deciding where to put things, I could have an all flash array from an all flash vendor who's a startup and I could have a large capacity array from a more traditional storage vendor and let the host decide which virtual disk goes on which one and now I'm not locked in to any particular user, any particular vendor. When we start talking about moving the flash into the server, it opens up the doors for the server vendors because they own that box and you want to have something that's going to be supported in the service contract for that. It opens the door for independent software vendors. We're going to write the caching layer and the big storage vendors specifically EMC aren't blind to this. They came out with the VF cache, which is their software caching layer and then they buy PCIe flash cards from Micron and LSI and bundle it all together. But the range of products in that caching layer is enormous. There's very basic read-only cache products. There's read and write cache products. There's products that work in an operating system and therefore good for the Oracle database acceleration but if you use them in the VMWare world, don't give you the VMotion capability because the cache is locked to that host. A lot of range and a lot of places yet to go. So who are the leaders in your mind right now? Obviously FusionIO was out to a fast start. It's interesting news on FusionIO yesterday made an announcement with Cisco. We talked about who's a potential server guy getting into storage. We've been watching Cisco for the last decade of his space. You see Fusion, you see violent memories raised $160 million, got an $800 million valuation. SolidFire hasn't come to the market yet but they're doing some interesting things.  You're hearing Dell talk about it, IBM, HP, they're all talking about it. Help us squint through that. Who are the leaders right now in your mind? I think for the server side you've got to say EMC is the leader because they've got the channel. Their product is very basic. VF cache is what they could get out on the schedule that they wanted to get it out. It's just a read cache. It doesn't let you do VMotion. But they got boots on the ground pushing that product out and they're going to have that first player advantage. FusionIO snapped up IoTurbine who had a more sophisticated caching layer for VMware. It does let you do VMotion with the limitation that when you move a workload from one host to another the cache is cold when you get to the second location. And then there's SanDisk bought up FlashSoft and there's the seven dwarves of ISVs with new products. The interesting thing about the UCS announcement and LSI made a similar announcement last week is the first generation of UCS blades only had one mezzanine card. And I looked at that and I said well there's one mezzanine card and you have to put the network card, one mezzanine slot, you have to put the network card there. There's no room for anything else. And so all of these announcements about PCIE Flash for UCS are dependent on second generation UCS blades that have that second mezzanine card. So that opens up the possibilities as well. But both HP and especially Dell with their latest generation of servers now have front mount PCIe slots specifically for SSDs. So you don't have to open the server, derack it to get to the slot. Storage guys really like the idea of hot swap. SSDs are going to fail, they may not fail in the same way or as frequently as hard drives. If I can pop it out of the front of the server I'm a lot happier with that. If it's a PCIe connection I'm going to get the same performance as if it was a card. And NVMe and SCSI Express are working on standards for that connector so I can buy that SSD for multiple vendors as well. How about a couple of like Violin, I mean I've looked at them and said they're kind of like the data domain of Flash and that you can just plug it into your existing environment and they've got this huge valuation and Don Bacillus raised a bunch of money. What do you make of that? Violin's done a great job raising money and they're in the all Flash array category so they compete with Whiptail and Nimbus and Kaminario and a couple of others. And I did a blog post on network computing last week or the week before where I classified the all solid state array vendors into the dragsters and the Lamborghini class and the BMW M class. We're running low on time. I've got one follow up question I'd like to ask you. We said it's kind of early days. There's a lot of technology work that needs to be done here, a lot of new startups. Where are we in this trend and how long before most customers, there's going to be technology available that most customers are going to be able to hop on? I think right now we're kind of at the end of the first quarter. There are some products that are worth having. They're all very preliminary versions and none of them have the full feature set. The truth is what we really want is something that will accelerate all of our workloads that will work in the Vemotion or Hyper-V or Zen environment and let us do Vemotion with a hot cache so that you can move a workload from one server to another and have that cache preheated and not take a performance hit when you do it. What we really want to do is turn on DRS. We want it to happen automatically. No, no. I thought Carter George summed it up great yesterday when he said what we really want is a knob I can just turn to 11 and it takes care of everything. So what's the... And that's sometime next year. What's Dell got to do in Flash? Last question. Well, the RNA network stuff that they're calling Hermes is really promising. They need to do a better job with Flash in their arrays. Right now, both Ecologic and Compellent use Flash for automatic sublun tiering. I'd rather see them do some additional caching with Flash as well because I think the combination of the two is worth a lot more than either of those features alone. I think on the server side, they've got that interface in the front of the Gen2 servers that makes a lot of sense that Hermes software, if it really delivers read and write caching and the mobility that they're talking about is going to be better than anybody else that's out on the market and they've got the potential to be able to deliver a real winning solution. So your study is out this month or next month? It's out in July and people can get more information about it on the projects page at www.deetsstorage.net and I think this is a very exciting piece of the market and the last thing is I've heard people say that server side caching is just a Band-Aid and even if that's true, Johnson and Johnson makes a lot of money selling Band-Aids. If you're bleeding and you have that performance problem, a Band-Aid is the solution for now even if it's not the 10 years from now solution. Excellent. All right, Howard Marks, Deep Storage Net. Thank you very much for sharing your independent perspectives. Thanks for coming on theCUBE. It was great to see you. My pleasure. All right, keep it right there. We'll be right back with Brian Payne and we'll talk servers. All right, keep it right there.


Point yonk. Who made this name, bro? Come on.  I'm ecstatic that House Rules is back. House Rules is one of my favorite things, bro. House Rules, Superstar KO, Madden 20 has its issues, but it is by far the most fun I've had in the past four years playing Madden. By far. Let's look at the rules on this. We got 72 hours to play this, so I'm gonna try and get all the rewards I can. You get three points if you get an interception or a fumble, right?   This is so bizarre. We're rocking with the same team. We always got Lamar Jackson at QB. Recently, we reset the Wheel of Mutt team, so I think I've got Gale Sayers and Nick Chubb in a halfback. Just kind of some randoms I picked up. Yeah, we're in 87 overall. We got a solid squad. Let's do this. Yeah, there's my top three. That's the Wheel of Mutt top three, Trenavious Calil Darius Sle. And he's got Steve Young, all right. I hate seeing that, but we'll survive. I can't run the ball. I can't scramble with Lamar Jackson.  Let's see what he goes with. RB wide open. Hey! Let's go. That's gotta be a point, right? So I got a point for that. What did he lose a point for though? I don't know why he lost points there. I'll be totally honest. Make the pass. Let's go. Dude, I'm beast mode right now. Yes. And he lost a point for that too. All right. I definitely got to keep doing my user playmakers. Let's work on our pocket presence. Shit. I'm going to lose points for that. Oh, wait. You don't lose any points for getting sacked. But if I were to run with Lamar Jackson there, I would lose points. This is going to be really interesting. But I also definitely want the first down. Oh, RB wide open. If you're not going to send any pressure on me, I can do that all day.  We just started the game. Hey, good start. Point yank. I like this. Additionally, a huge shout out to C-Geek for sponsoring this video. You can always use my code MMG to get $20 off your first purchase. C-Geek's the best spot to get tickets for anything, by the way. They also just launched the Daily Tap. They're giving away thousands of dollars in tickets and discounts to stuff like NFL games, post-malone concerts, and even more. It's totally free. You can enter every single day and all you do is tap a button. So of course, download the app, use my code MMG, get $20 off, and don't forget to enter that Daily Tap. Enjoy the rest of the video, guys. All right. We're playing a dude with the magician's uniforms. He runs RPO first play. We just can't let him get. I was going to say we can't let him get 10 yards and I let him get 10 yards. Darn it. Wait. He just ran. I think he's learning the game mode as well. He just ran the ball and lost himself a point and got me a point. Dude, why are you running the ball? What is wrong with you? I don't think he gets how this game mode works. All right. Third and 11. We're guessing pass. Everyone's deep. Come on, boys. Good. Let's see where he wants to go with it. Okay. He's going to scramble. You realize that is a run play. I am accidentally on Damon Harrison and I do not mean to be. He's going to throw one deep. That's an interception. Oh my God. I thought he almost caught that. I would have gone ballistic. Sending a blitz with Kalomak. He throws another. It's 16-24. All right. Pushing everyone off. We're playing over the top. We're playing the pass. We know what's coming. Come on, throw it. Come on. I know you want to throw this. Let's go. Turn over on downs. Aaron Donald with the sack. Goodbye. Two range quits. I'm good at point yank. We are facing tougher canoe. Ooh, that's kind of a squad. All right. I'm excited for this one. Let's see how good our opponent's user is. We'll know real soon here. Oh, he is a D-Lieman user. We are going to have a fun game on this one. All right. Let's do it. We're going straight into no huddle. We're going with shakes.  Come on, baby. Is he there? He might not be. I'm looking at main coverage. A is wide open. Wait, wait, wait. Let's go. Toriel's got it and a juke. Let's go. I thought that was picked off for sure. All right. Let's see it. I need a 10 yard gain. Oh, I really want to... Was anybody open? Oh, wait.  Wait, I'm losing by two now? How am I losing?  Let's go get it back. I got to throw for 10 yards here. Shit. God damn it. This dude's fast as hell. I didn't lose any points for that though. Fourth and 43. All right. I'm going to send Gale Sayers on just a little mini route right here. And then Gale Sayers, playmaker. Oh my God, it's there. No, Metro, Metro! I perfectly ran that too, dude. I'm so sad right now. Corner out. Oh, coming underneath, coming underneath. Where do you want it? Where do you want it? Where do you want it? Where do you want it? The D. Third and one. We're sending the blitz. Let's see if he wants to throw to his halfback. Let's go. We got this sack. Fourth and eight. Van Der Resch coming in quick. He's going for a field goal. Dude, what kicker is about to hit him? 59. I couldn't hit a 53. Absolutely not. Okay, yeah, I can't hit that. I don't even know why I tried that. He's a D-line user, so I'm thinking I should be able to slip screen him here. All right, let's see what happens. Is it there? Is it there? Yes, we got it. Do we get a juke? No, we don't. Damn, Stephens is playing really good. We know he's a D-line user, Matt. Let's just simmer down. We can definitely do this. I really just need to get the first down. If I have to scramble for a first down, I'll do it because I got to go score. All right, I guess I have to do it.  I lose points for that. All right, fourth and three. I'm going to do it again. Oh, actually no, I don't need to. One of these has got to be open. Okay, B, wide open. Yes, we got some points on the board there. Let's go. We're marching down the field right now. Let's keep it up. Let's keep it up. I'm going to step up in the pocket, go a user playmaker to why Gale Sears has got it, 10 plus yards. 19-21, call timeout. All right, now we put it in the end zone. It doesn't matter how we do it. We're going to get six points for it. So if I got to rush the ball, I got to rush the ball. I think this will be there though. I think this is a touchdown. Let's get that RPO touchdown. Hold that block. Good juke. Oh my God, juke box is so overpowered. Did you see how fast that was? All right, I guess this guy is just griefing me now. I think this is a third rage quit technically. Your peer has been kicked for excessive griefing. That's what we're about to see here.    He's going to throw a bomb. If we get an interception here, that's three points. Still get points to the incomplete though, so that's good. 27-20. All right, I'm going to stay in the slants because I know he's running a lot of man coverage stuff. Oh, X. Wide open, great ball here. Got a juke from Tyreekill. We're taking up the sideline. 28-19. Great work. God, this is going really, really well. I think I can hit Tyreekill here on an early slant. I'm pretty sure. Yeah, I can. Early slants. 10 yards. Is that, are they going to count? Yes, they counted for 10. 29-18. I'm going to try and hit Y here. Oh, I got him. Beauty. First down, Gale Sares. And we're just going to rip this clock apart. Good. Who's there? I'm going to go Gale Sares underneath. Absolutely massacred his user. That was, that just might be the thumbnail boys. Make sure you're looking out. That just might be it. Three, count them up. Count them up. One, two, three rage quits and point yank. They just always want to start me out on offense. Oh my gosh, this is 10 yards Tyreekill. This has to be unless his user gets over there. Nope, nope, nope. 10 yards easy. Nice catch. Tyreekill for being an 86 overall is actually a god. Doesn't make any sense. All right, now he's going to float over to Tyreekill, so we're going to throw it to RB, right?  Whatever. I can get sacked. Getting sacked is okay. You don't lose points for that. We're going to run my all-time favorite play, RPOP zone bubble. Let's see it.  Whip it in. Give me a block. Decent, decent. That wasn't 10 yards though, so it doesn't help us. Third and 17. Let's see who gets open here. I'm going to step up in the pocket so that I can view.  Gale Sayers. Wait, what just happened? I have no idea why he cooked in defense like that. That's huge. Oh my god. The fifth straight range. Dude, why aren't people so apt to quit in this game mode? The easiest four wins in my life. I'll say that. This might be our quality game that we've been looking for. Michael Vick at QB. Wait. Okay, it could be passed. Good work. I'm sending a big-ass blitz here. Very aggressive blitz. Oh no, that's my zone. Main coverage blitz. Let's see how this goes. See if he looks half back. Does he? Let's go. Got the sack. All right. Let us clamp. It is our duty as young men to clamp. No, that's 10 yards. Back to 20 to 20. All right. Let's see what we got here. Who's open? Who's open? Is he looking here? Yes, you just threw at my face. Oh my god. All right, this guy ain't going to win. He's bad. He just threw directly at my face. All right, we need a QB spy. He's getting too much time back there.  I thought he was actually running it. Oh, pick. Let's go to Davies White. And that's three points for me. 22 to 18. All right. We're going to start this game out. It looks like he's in a blitz, dude. We're going to start this game out with my RPO zone big bubble. Just the greatest play ever. Oh, good. I faked out his user. Got a juke. Jukebox is so fast. Damn it. That's the quarter. No huddle. Slants would have worked so well there. I think his user is supposed to be on Galesayer. So this should be there. Is he? Oh, it was open. I should have thrown it when I had it. I'm throwing to A. Dangerous. Dangerous pass, but Lamar Jackson just threw a absolute dump. Thank you. First in 10, we're starting to really increase this lead right now. Come on. Oh, is he there? He's totally there. 10 yards. Wait. Yes. Let's go. Wait. Is that Marvin Jones? Who is that? Who is that wide receiver? I thought I had Julio. Okay. I have no idea who that wide receiver is, but that's awesome. I really don't remember picking up whoever that is, but I'm very happy. All right. I'm going to hit Galesayers underneath, and we're going to make a play. And that's over 10 yards. Dude, we're actually so good at this game mode. 15 to 25. Let's keep doing what we got to do. Oh, X. Easy. Tyreek Hill. It's actually almost good that I didn't get a touchdown. Or no, it's not. Never mind. Never mind.  Let's punch this into the end zone. I really should just scramble.  I'll take my sack. So I don't lose any points for that sack, right? But now I can gain 10 yards on one play. So it's almost smart that I did that. Right? Because watch. All I got to do is throw for 10 yards here. Oh God. I don't think I'm going to get it. I'm going to try and juke this dude out. No. Wait. Oh my God. That was. I literally am now losing. I literally couldn't have done anything stupider. I was just winning by 10. All right. I got 22 seconds to make up for my supreme idiocy. Was that incredibly dumb? Yes. Can we make up for it? Yes. Hold those blocks. Now I need Gale Sayers. There he is. Wait, wait, wait. Did he catch that?  Is that Gale Sayers or Randy Moss? First in 10. Huge play. Going Gale Sayers again. Oh, he doesn't catch that one. Oh, shoot. And that's an incomplete pass. Eight seconds left. I should be able to take the lead here if I rifle this correctly. Oh, perfect. Perfect. Nice catch. Three seconds left. We're up by one. I should just get sacked here.  A come down. A come down. Oh, Y come down. Yes. 10 yards.  That's nine yards now. Oh, easy. That's obviously 10 and more. Touchdown. It's got to be a touchdown, right? None of you can catch Tyree Kill. Let's go. I genuinely got closely choking this one away, but we're back to 32 to 22. Wow. They can really yank those points, right, guys? Because that's the name of the, okay. I'll just kill myself. All right. I'm going to play everyone underneath. Let's see if we can like jump something here.  Let's get this slip screen off the Gale Sayers. He doesn't see it. He doesn't see it. The blocks are setting up. Wait, oh my God. I thought he was going to take that. I'm just going to keep doing what we're doing here and going straight into two o'clock.   Oh, yeah. You happen to be experiencing network issues when you're down by 18. I don't think so. All right, guys. I think I'm going to close this one off there. Five straight dollars. That was sick. That was so much fun. I hope you guys enjoy it. House rules is dope. I don't know what else to say. If you want to see more, let me know. I'm definitely going to play more of this. I really want to get the 35 wins for the NAT Hero Fantasy Pack. I'll probably do that. Thanks for watching. I'll see you guys in the next video. Peace out.