Hello everyone. It's so nice to be here with you all today. My name is Jen DePauley and as it said, I'm a senior researcher at the Learning Policy Institute. We appreciate you taking the time to attend today's webinar. This webinar presented in co-sponsorship with AASA, the Superintendent's Association, the Soul Alliance and CASEL is the third in our six-part series on transforming state education policy through a whole child approach. The series draws on the whole child policy toolkit in an interactive website which provides a framework for state whole child policy. You can find the toolkit at the link in the chat. We drop there shortly. Within it, you will find research, policy action states can take, state policy examples and resources across five areas. Today we're going to focus on the second element in the toolkit, transforming learning environments. From the science of learning and development, we know that the brain develops as a function of relationships and experiences. So we need to ensure that learning environments are safe and welcoming and designed to support strong, positive relationships. State policy makers can take several actions to advance the transformation of learning settings, which we'll hear more about throughout this webinar. But some of those include things like supporting relationship-centered schools, classrooms and out-of-school programs, fostering safe and welcoming environments by prioritizing identity-safe classrooms and culture-responsive curricula, replacing harsh zero-tolerance discipline policies with restorative practices that are trauma-informed and healing-focused, establishing integrated support systems such as community school models, and providing high-quality expanded learning time opportunities, including high-dose tutoring and before and after school and summer learning programs. Before we dive deeper into the policy, though, I want to introduce our presenter, Dr. Pamela Cantor, who will provide the latest science behind why whole-child school designs are so critically important. Dr. Cantor is a physician, author and thought leader on human potential, the science of learning and development, and educational equity. Dr. Cantor practiced child and adolescent psychiatry for nearly two decades, specializing in trauma. In the aftermath of the 9-11 attack, she found a turnaround for children, which translates scientific insights into tools and services that help educators establish the conditions for all students to thrive. In two books published in 2021, Whole Child Development, Learning and Thriving a Dynamic Systems Approach, and the Science of Learning and Development, Dr. Cantor crystallizes key scientific concepts about how human potential and learning unfold so that anyone seeking to open pathways for learning and opportunity for young people can do so. Dr. Cantor is a governing partner of the Science of Learning and Development Alliance, a member of the Brookings Institution's Task Force on Next Generation Community Schools, and a commissioner of the Learning 2025 Commission of the American Association of School Superintendents. She received an MD from Cornell University, a BA from Sarah Lawrence College, and was a visiting scholar at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. And with that, I would like to pass it over to Pam, very excited for your presentation. Oh, and I see you're on mute, Pam. I was thanking you for such an extraordinarily generous introduction. I apologize for the hoarseness, so hopefully it won't be disturbing. You know, when we think about somebody like Serena Williams, how did she become Serena Williams? Or Mae Jemison? How did she become the first black female astronaut? How does each of us become who we become? The passion to understand this has animated my life and work, and it all began in med school. I wasn't destined for med school. I had known trauma as a child. I was sexually abused by an uncle, and my parents couldn't face it. But I did have this one person, a psychiatrist, who saw me in a completely different way. He told me I was a pearl in an oyster.  So you can imagine the day I walked into his office and I told him, I'm going to be a doctor. And he said, of course you are. And I thought, did he not know that to that point I'd been an art major? I had not taken any math or science courses. So my journey into medicine began then with GED classes and pre-med courses. It was a mountain of prerequisites. But even with the hurdles, I did well. Enough to be waitlisted at 11 schools and accepted at one Cornell University med school. So 28 years old, I began. The night before that first day, I noticed something happening to my voice. First some crackling as if I were getting a cold. That would be like what I have now. But then by late evening, my voice was gone. Not laryngitis. Gone. I was mute. I was up the entire night in a panic saying I can't go. This is impossible. This is going to be totally humiliating. And in the early morning, I thought to myself, okay, I'll grab this clipboard and I wrote on it. I am Pam and I don't have a voice today. People who would become my classmates introduced themselves to me by writing on my clipboard. And as I sat down for that very first lecture, I looked around and I was struck. I was one of only a few women in my class. And yes, I was older than everybody else. I can't imagine what my classmates thought of me that woman with the clipboard, but they didn't embarrass me. They helped me get through it. That night, I drove to my therapist's office. I couldn't call him because I had no voice. I had to see him. What is this? I wrote pointing to my throat. He said it was a severe stress induced reaction to the experience of that first day of med school. He took a pause and then he said, you still really don't believe that you belong here. He explained the power of stress to frighten. Shut us down to ensure that we take no risks to avoid feeling like an imposter and how powerful and excruciating that can be these feelings. When you don't believe you're worthy of something, you don't believe you belong. Of course, I asked, how long will it take to get my voice back? And he said it takes two weeks to get used to anything new like this. Now I remember thinking he might be making mad up, but I trusted him. And so I started counting down the days going to class with my clipboard, feeling myself settle in. And yes, the voice came back in just under two weeks. So here are the two big things I learned from my therapist. I learned that trust is the antidote to stress. It is. It just melts it away. And the belonging would become the most powerful antidote to things like fear, including the fear of being seen as an imposter. I would come to learn the biology of all of this in med school. I also learned I wasn't alone in my feelings, because one of my closest friends in my med school class was Mae Jemison. We shared many things, but by far, one of the most important was the question about whether we belonged. The reasons were surely different, but the feelings, they were exactly the same. So med school turned out to be this amazing universe where all kinds of mysteries were unpacked every day. The complex biologic mechanisms that explain all of the things that we're able to do. It wasn't just the obvious things like how our hearts and lungs work. It was how we love, how we attach, how we nurture, how we become conscious of ourselves, and how we heal after things go wrong. So I'll never forget the moment in my med school lecture where I heard this. There are 20,000 genes in the human genome, and yet in our lifetimes, fewer than 10% will ever be expressed. So I remember thinking well what determines what's in that 10%. It's context, the environments, experiences, and relationships of our lives. The risks but also the opportunities in development and learning sit inside this one profoundly important point that there is no separation between nature and nurture, biology and environment, brain and behavior only a collaboration between them. The genes I learned are actually chemical followers. They're little packages of protein covered with receptors that are triggered into action by the environments and relationships of our lives. This means the genes are not the drivers of who we become. Context drives the expression of our genes. And by context, we are speaking about relationships, like the one I had with my therapist, who taught me that trauma is not destiny. And the relationship that I had with classmates, including May, who always had my back, would never let me give up. This is about our families, our communities, our colleagues, our teachers and our friends, and the safety and belonging we experience that pushes our own growth forward, and helps us achieve the things that we dream of. Developmental and learning science tells an optimistic story about what's possible for all of us, especially our young people, because the human brain and our bodies and our abilities are malleable to experience because the brain is a dynamic living structure that's made of a tissue that is the most susceptible to change from experience of any tissue in the human body. And the brain is malleable over time. Most of its growth happens after we're born. So there are multiple opportunities to catch up along the way. This was surely my story. There are really just three things that I want you to remember about brain development. The astounding malleability of the human brain, experienced dependent growth, and the role of context. So stress is the most common naturally occurring example of negative context. When we experience stress, cortisol floods our bodies and our brains, and it's intense when it happens. In my case, this is what caused me to become mute the night before med school started. But if the stress is mild or tolerable, it's adaptive. It makes us alert and sharp, and it helps us prepare for an important event like a test or a performance. But the hormone cortisol can do a lot of damage to the structures of the limbic system, especially when they are young and still developing, because today we know that adversity doesn't just happen to children. It happens inside their brains and bodies through the biologic mechanism of stress. But that's not the end of the story. There is a big upside when we turn to the hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin is produced only one way, human connection. This is the hormonal system that produces feelings of trust, love, safety, and belonging. It sets up the conditions for curiosity and exploration. This is the state where our minds open to possibility. It is a state of readiness to absorb something new like new learning where creativity can blossom because we don't fear embarrassment or ostracism. It is a state where feedback is not only welcome because there is trust. We're drawn to it. We are drawn to it like we are to food when we're hungry or water when we're thirsty. We go toward it. We have to. This is what curiosity is. You have had it. Picture that state in your mind for a moment of wanting to know more and do more and be more. Chemically speaking, curiosity is most like a biological drive that is seeking satisfaction. It could be knowledge we're introduced to when we want more of it. It could be mastery of a skill and a coach helps us see that the goal we have is actually within reach. The chemical in charge of all of this is a neurotransmitter called dopamine. This is our dopamine pathway. It is our salience and reward pathway, and it is released when we are introduced to something that matters to us a lot. Very often by someone who matters to us a lot and we want more of it. We move toward it. We feel satisfied. We are rewarded for our curiosity and then we want even more. Think about when you have been lost in a book and you have no idea where the time went. Think about a time when someone showed you something that you absolutely didn't believe you could do and then you did it. That feeling, it's a rush. It is the dopamine rush. Oxytocin sets up the conditions, the atmosphere, where curiosity is possible, but it is dopamine that rewards us for our exploration. This cocktail, oxytocin and dopamine is the cocktail we want to set up in our classrooms. Curiosity, engagement, and the fullest expression of a student's potential is possible. Oxytocin has many, many important aspects to it. It hits all the same structures in the brain as cortisol, but it's the more powerful hormone because it can literally protect children at the level of the cell from the damaging effects of cortisol. This is why the effects of trauma are reversible. I'm going to say that a second time. This is why the effects of trauma are reversible. Not the events, but the feelings and emotions are. This is why trauma is not destiny. The message in the science is clear. We need a new design mapped to the way the brain grows and learns. A design that nurtures belief and confidence and provides for a fierce sense of belonging so no student settles for anything less than their highest aspiration. A design that combines positive developmental relationships, environments filled with safety and belonging. Which meaningful learning experiences so students discover what they're capable of. The intentional development of the critical habits, skills and mindsets that all successful learners have and integrated supports. My partner Linda darling Hammond and I with turnaround for children co authored a playbook that Jen referred to design principles for schools. That goes into detail and shows how to operationalize these five core elements. It's filled with stories elevating where this work is going on today and offering the tools and resources that would make this possible in any learning setting in any district. And with our collaborators Karen Pittman and Marita Irby, there is actually a playbook using the same principles for out of school settings. So one final thought to leave you with. So Mozart, a Martin Luther King or a mage emison existed in a classroom design the way many of our classrooms are still designed today. It's more than likely. We wouldn't know they were there. We've not yet gotten to the right answers about human learning and human performance and unlocking human potential, because we haven't been asking enough of the right questions. What are the forces that define the expression of human potential, the developmental range of individual performance and the acquisition of competencies at higher and higher levels of performance, no matter where a person begins. What experiences and environments and relationships produce those kinds of results. How did I become me? How did may become may. It starts with this mind blowing insight that context and relationships grow the brain trigger the expression of our genes harness the brain's astonishing male ability to unleash the potential in each and every young person. For me, Jimison, the sky was never the limit. It shouldn't be for anyone. Thank you all so much. I'm going to turn it back to Jim. Thank you so much Pam that was incredibly powerful and I would be remiss if I didn't say how important it is that we all keep that in mind as we're thinking about changing practice, practice and policy. So thank you again Pam. And as a reminder to everybody on the webinar if you have any questions for Dr cancer, please drop them in the chat and she will do her best to answer them. And now to take that more into the policy realm and what has been happening at the federal level to support these changes in schools. So let's pass it over to our next presenter and the moderator of our panel today, Laquisha steel Laquisha is the vice president of policy at castle. Prior to joining castle she was deputy assistant secretary at the Department of Education. And prior to that she worked for nearly 10 years in the US House and Senate, including most recently leading K 12 education policy on the committee on education and labor for chairman Bobby Scott. So Laquisha we're so excited to have you take it away. Thank you so much Jen and thank you so much for the invitation to moderate and participate in this briefing with with so many of you who have just been at the helm of doing this work. Since I began this presentation, I started to just think about the history, you know, on how far the federal has gone has come, you know, and shifting toward a whole child approach and education policy. So I first began by just starting from a place of how concentrated segregation leads to concentrate a poverty which leads to concentrated disadvantage, and which is reinforced in an equitable education system. The work of organizations like turn around for children, the learning policy Institute researchers like my colleague, Dr. Rob jakers is going to hate that I shouted him out at castle, who have really been at the forefront with leaders that we're going to hear from on this panel today, Dr. Glenn, ornament and Dr. Terry Loller, who really have been at the forefront of the science of learning and development, really pushing our policymakers and working with our policymakers to understand what it takes to really mitigate that concentrated disadvantage that's in that thrives in an equitable schools. And what does it truly take to ensure that our children not only thrive in schools but also thrive in their lives. So I think that going into this this presentation on the federal policies that support whole child education. It's really important to give credit where credit is due, because policy does not happen in a vacuum. Change is certainly slow, but at some point, the politics and the policy and the people and the procedures that take that that that are required to produce legislation that we're going to talk about today. They don't usually align, but they align because of the hard work that is being done at the state level by incredible leaders by our researchers and by organizations like LPI and turnaround for children. So I just want to say hat tip to you all, and just the remarkable work that you have done and leading our country to creating this priority and federal and federal policy and really expanding that federal role in education. So look at where Congress has come and I didn't even take out back to 1965 we don't have that much time, but we're going to start with ESCA, and we all know that the elementary and secondary Education Act was reauthorized as the every Seats Act in 2015, and not only did the elementary and secondary Education Act not only does it require states, you know, to set academic standards to measure student achievement to develop state accountability systems. There is this focus on all child education, you know, through measures of school quality and student success through the authorization of grant programs such as the student support and academic enrichment grants and the authorization, you know, of grants like the full community schools and by the time we get to the end of this presentation we're going to see the work that actually has been done to take a grant program that was authorized at 10 million, and to see that that funding has increased to 140 million over the past five years. So if you look at how states have been leveraging elementary and secondary Education Act to address system inequity and to focus on whole child education. These are some of the things that we're seeing happening, you know, including measures of school, school climate and SCL and state accountability systems, replacing exclusionary discipline practices with SCL supports and restorative justice, advancing whole child education as a school improvement strategy. So we're seeing title for a funding being used to ensure that focus on whole child supports. We also saw with the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act in March 21st of 2021 that Congress delivered this historic investment of 122 billion in K-12 education with a specific focus on academic recovery and social-emotional learning. Students and districts are actually using these dollars to promote safe and healthy learning environments where children can thrive in it, really thinking about addressing those learning conditions for the success of students through their state and district plans. We also know that states are using ARP funds to support academic and SCL learning, and we will share some resources with you all today. I think the Council has produced a report as well as the Chief State School Officers has produced a report to really share how states are leveraging these policies to really meet the academic and social-emotional learning needs of our kids. We also saw that with the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which was signed into law on June 25th, 2022, that Congress then commits again to whole child education with this two billion funding focused around school safety and student mental health. There's also prohibition on ESEA funds to prohibit funding on dangerous weapons, but this focus specifically around on producing this grant, funding for this grant at one billion so that states are able to meet and think about what it takes to create safe learning environments in the conditions, again, that are required to do so. And that requires a focus on well-rounded education and safe and healthy students. And to know that these dollars went out by Title IV aid that we know that we're already used to produce and support whole child supports, it's really a hat tip to Congress for this effort. We also saw that Congress provided in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act this $50 million for afterschool programs. We saw this focus on mental health programs, this $1 billion investment. We also saw focused on around whole child supports in the Department of Education's guidance for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. There was quite a bit of funding specifically around the uses of funds for whole child education and particularly looking at social-emotional learning supports. And in the FY23 omnibus that was just passed in December, we also see a continued bipartisan focus on SEL and whole child approaches. Remember at the beginning of this presentation, we talked about ESEA and specifically the authorization of the Fool Service Community Schools. At that time, Fool Service Community Schools were funded at $10 million. They are funded at $150 million today. We're also seeing continued investments in the Education and Innovation Research Grant Program, what specifically a set aside for social-emotional learning research within those grants. We're seeing the same focus around professional development and the importance of preparing our teachers for entering the classroom through the SEA grants. We're also seeing the focus around promised neighborhoods and also our school safety national activities. And over the last three years through the work of Chair Doloro, the creation of this initiative has really led to a continued focus on whole child approaches and education. We're also seeing how far we've come with the increase in funding for Title 1A grants, which we know can be used for whole child education and SEL supports with an increase to $18.4 billion. And we also have seen the Title 4A grants, the student support and academic enrichment grants increased to $1.4 billion, and FY17 Title 4A grants were funded at $400 million. And again, this is an example of the culmination of groups working together in the leadership of our state leaders to really get the attention of policymakers to educate them on the science of learning and development and what it takes for our children to be able to thrive in education and throughout their lives. It's through the work of you all that's really led to the culmination of these particular policies. And without further ado, we're going to go ahead and introduce our panelists so we can get into the conversation today. I'm going to introduce Gwen first. Gwen, who is with us, Dr. Gwen Warnemann is with us. She is the director of the New Mexico Legislative Education Study Committee. She has served public education for over two decades across the elementary to post-secondary landscape. A native New Mexican, she is passionate about elevating student voice and uplifting systems that both contribute to community health and enable school cultures to reflect deeper learning for students and adults. Most recently, prior to her current role, she served as the deputy cabinet secretary for teaching, learning, assessment and policy at the public education department and as program director for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation. A teacher at heart, Gwen is the mother of two wonderful young men and earned her PhD through New Mexico State University and curriculum and instruction with a focus on bilingual STEM education. Thank you so much for being here with us today, Dr. Warnemann. And our next panelist that I get to introduce is Dr. Terry Lawler. Dr. Terry Lawler is passionate about making equity of opportunity available to all students regardless of zip code. Delaware's 2010 school psychologist of the year. Terry has spent her career translating research to practice in some of our state's most vulnerable school communities. In November 2018, Terry joined the Office of Equity and Innovation at the Delaware Department of Education. Under Terry's leadership, Delaware has achieved 100% trauma sensitive status institutionalizing self care and incorporating trauma awareness training into new employee onboarding. Outward facing work includes establishing a trainer to trainer model which has yielded a cohort of 234 school districts and youth serving organization trainers, supporting school communities with a statewide compassionate schools learning collaborative focused on whole child development. Differentiating professional learning for educators and community partners from preschool to grade 12 on SCL, trauma, culturally responsive pedagogy response restorative practices, equitable and just schools and mindfulness practices to reduce and eliminate the non-academic barriers to learning. This work provided the infrastructure for Delaware to be named one of the five trauma recovery demonstration project states with a $7.5 million award from the US Department of Education. Terry was recently honored by the by Governor John Carney and Delaware kids count for leadership excellence. So we are definitely in the midst of the most amazing state leaders who continue to to really push our country forward with a focus on whole child development and thank you so much for being with us Dr. Lawler welcome. Thank you so much. And so we can just go ahead and get into the conversation so we just talked about some of the federal policies that really have shifted toward this whole child education. Dr. Lawler, I will start with you. And then Dr. one and I would love for you to jump in. You know just to share how your state has really leveraged these federal policies to focus on whole child education and I think I probably already shared a bit of yours Dr. Lawler and your introduction. Thank you. Just a little bit. Delaware has transformed our learning environments with the whole child in mind by advocating for the collective humanity of all of our students and centering neuroscience and child development and all discussions on teaching and learning. I believe that attachment and belonging are at the core of safe stable learning environments, and that by having a highly qualified teacher in the front of the class. You have to begin by having a highly regulated adult who's available to co regulate and share their knowledge to build strong relationships with students. It's in these interactions and the establishment of regular routines that trust is built in the classroom community and we cultivate the safety that provides that enabling contacts for learning. The work began with pockets of innovation around 2014 that led to a groundswell of grassroots support, resulting in Governor John Carney signing Executive Order 24 to make Delaware trauma informed state in October of 2018. Months prior to that, Senator Margaret Rose Henry and our Lieutenant Governor's Behavioral Health Consortium supported comprehensive school discipline improvement plans that caught out six strategies to improve school climate and culture that facilitated whole child development. And those six strategies were trauma informed practices, social and emotional learning, culturally responsive pedagogy, equity, mindfulness based stress reduction and restorative practices. As a department, we have inventoried all of our whole child initiatives across the work groups to confirm that this is everybody's work. And that inventory ultimately motivated a revision to our MTSS regulation, Regulation 508, recognizing that while our tiered supports framework was the means to the end, the actual end was whole child development. Thank you for for that. Dr. Lawler. Dr. Waterman, can can you share a bit about how your state has also leveraged these policies to focus on whole child education. Sure. Thank you first, Laquisha very much and Dr. Lawler is quite a privilege to be on this panel with the both of you. I feel very humbled. And Buenos Aires todos. So I'm going to just talk actually a little bit about the significant thing that happened in New Mexico in 2018. And then that was a ruling by district court judge is a sufficiency lawsuit that happened. And in New Mexico, what's a little bit different than several other states that have sufficiency lawsuits happen to their state Department of Education is that the lawsuit also recognize that the students were not just not the state was not just meeting the failing to meet the needs of the students in terms of their education clause of the state of education, but in addition the due process clause. And that was particularly important because it identified subgroups of students, or groups of students are low socioeconomic students are special education students are English are now native American students were not receiving sufficient education. In addition, we also have these really wonderful education acts in New Mexico, a Hispanic Education Act a bilingual multicultural Education Act, a black Education Act, as well as an Indian Education Act, and the ruling found that the state was failing to meet the needs of those students. So, as a consequence, through this lawsuit and I think, in addition sort of the perfect timing of what was happening at the federal level, the state really thought deeply about funding, as well as programmatic approaches that sort of have this really sort of begin to transform, remove the state in the direction of a whole child education really grounded in what we have defined as culturally and linguistically responsive education. And I'll hit on that later but the term linguistically responsive is really fundamental I think in terms of the state and that whole child vision. Dr one about you really bring up an important, you know, point about the state role being how the state is constitutionally obligated, you know, to provide a quality education to students, and this lawsuit, you know, prove that the state wasn't meeting the student needs, and then that propelled forward this focus on whole child education. Can you say a bit about how that change how that shift to focus on meeting the full needs of our children, how that actually has impacted the student academic achievement and student well being as well as the learning environments and schools. Sure. It's a difficult question because I think that we've had sort of this one to punch in as a state, and potentially as a nation as well or world for that matter of already not meeting the needs of students, and particularly in a culturally responsive and sustainable way, and a pandemic on top of that. Right. And so, with those two things I think what you're asking, which is, have we then do we see results and are we, you know, already there and I would say the one thing that has come out of this is understanding, if you will, of really recognizing both of those fundamental impacts is that believe policymakers in general as well as the most critical stakeholders students themselves, and then all of our administrators are educated educator leaders are fundamentally beginning to see that we need a systems lens, as well as a systems breakdown. Right. And so something like this toolkit, this whole child vision is fundamental in order to really begin to then put together components around transformation, as opposed to sort of piecemealing transformation which I think we began we had, we have inherited through the kind of our history and education. Thank you so much for that Dr ornament. Dr Loller. I would love for you to weigh in here under your leadership. Delaware has received, you know, 100% trauma sensitive status. You all receive this trauma, since it trauma recovery demonstration grant from the US Department of Education. There really has been this intentional focus on whole child development. And you share a bit about the changes that you're seeing in your schools and school districts, and really what that impact has been on students. I think one of the biggest changes we've seen is that we've had to grow the work to be more resilience oriented and focus on student strengths and educator well being. We've also expanded professional learning to include not only our classroom educators, but also anyone who works in our school community, as well as you serve and partners are out of school time providers community based organizations. We've engaged caregivers and students and a variety of empathy interviews so that we can really hear what feels like to be in our school environments. And then recognizing that you know if we want to have physical psychological emotional safety is got to be more than what we say. And I think we've had to work very deeply and intentionally with our partners, and that includes our other state use serving agencies to make sure that we're all working from the same and speaking from the same lens, but also being really efficient and how we share and deploy resources, you know so we're not working separately and fragmented Lee, you can have whole children with fragmented supports we really have to work together. Thank you so much for that Dr. Lawler. I really want to begin this next question with you Dr ornament we have a question in the chat that I'll just place in this context you know so within our education system we know that we are have a public education system that's serving 15 million children. The majority of those children are low income, and they're also children of color. We saw this focus intentional focus at the federal level with the reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act to it to make sure that subgroups of students are counted in state accountability systems and that we're thinking about what it means to ensure the success of subgroups of students. And with that said, there's a question in the chat about how does full child education support our students of color. So just thinking about our black and Latin X and our indigenous students. Can you, can you share a bit about what that looks like in in your in your state Dr ornament. Thank you. I'm going to talk a little bit about two of the particular policy strategies that are found under transforming learning environments in this toolkit. Just in, I think, having both Dr. Lawler and I on the panel is really a nice beautiful duo because Dr. Lawler strength is going to be a little different from mine. So in terms of the fourth and fifth of learning, transforming learning environments, those strategies one is around integrated support systems and the others about expanding learning time and what that looks like. I think in reference to what you're asking, Laquisha, great question. How does that impact and in what way do we really engage and or impact our students who are Latin X Latino Latina, as well as our black students or as well as our indigenous students. It's really about centering them in particular policy strategies. So I'm going to give you a couple of examples. The first is as we begin to look at how to particularly transform high school and the high school experience. And again, this is sort of integrated support systems as well as expanding learning time and really acknowledging what learning time is for those students. What does that mean for those students and how are the particular like even nuanced strategies around high school, allowing them to shine and therefore all other students will shine right but in terms of high school graduation. What does it mean in terms of assessment for those particular students. And so in what way are the policies that we're doing, allowing them to have voice in that space and so particular thing that I think the state has done in New Mexico is really embrace capstones as a process of breaking down sort of what we have traditionally seen as racist systems of assessment and barriers in graduation. And capstones have been a really beautiful space in that I think we also have a really wonderful socio emotional learning framework that has been developed public education department. And we lean heavily on students to engage them in developing that we've heavily invested in community schools as a support system and there we now have a college community school act as well as a coalition is at the state level. And we have students in that work as well, so that there's broad stakeholders, really building these systems and that's really what we're doing is sort of building systems from the ground up, as well as acknowledging systems that have traditionally proved as barriers for these students. So I'll just sort of finish with this, this notion of equity councils which is also sort of a targeted strategy across the state that all districts are now engaging in that allow for voice from students as well as community members to really center those student groups. Thank you for that Dr one of it Dr Lawler, you said so eloquently that we can't have whole children with fragmented children. So can you say a bit about what whole child education means for black and Latino students in your state, as well as other students of color. For the question I think what it means is, one, a change in how we view our systems of support and expanding sort of redesigning those systems of support to be student center and meet student needs and not necessarily what is convenient for our prudent for our education systems. We have tried to be really expansive and aligning support across a continuum from physical health to emotional and behavioral health. And we've also worked really hard to go directly to our customers to you and families caregivers, so that we can hear where we are not missing are making the mark and collaborating authentically in ways that really will meet their needs. We've expanded our CTE programs even to include middle years, so that we are deepening supports in systemic ways, but also making sure that you from the elementary or primary grades through secondary are thinking about the power of their education and then be also being empowered to make decisions that will benefit them not just in school but across the community. Thank you so much for that Dr Loller you you really hit on the next question. You really discussed the importance, you know, of making sure that you are engaging with the youth, engaging with our families and our caregivers. Can you share a bit about what that has looked like for you, and what that, what that value add has been, you know, and leading to these policy outcomes. And what's been really awesome I think is that these listening sessions haven't just taken place in the walls of our SCA, our state board has gotten engaged, our first lady has gotten engaged, and all of our you serving agencies. It has a Family Services Cabinet Council, where all of the work to support children and youth in state agencies, those leaders meet regularly, we are collaborating regularly, not just around human capital but also funding resources. And in that work, we've spent about 18 months listening to students about what it feels like to walk in their shoes, not just in our school communities, but in our larger communities. We know that if, you know, if we want to hold children we need driving families we need resilient communities. So this isn't just the work of the school. With that in mind we've tried to partner broadly with any and all of our state agencies, but any partner that's invested in this work so that we can build the systems of care that are going to wrap supports around young people in the places where they live, work and play. Thank you so much for that, Dr. Dr. Lawler, Dr. Warniment. Well I can't believe that so much time has already gone by and we're already close to 4pm. But this is such a great question so many great questions in the chat, and we only have five minutes remaining. But can you share one piece of advice that you would give to a superintendent to embrace this work. There's, you know, the question is really just about disrupting the status quo, disrupting the status quo and, you know, just really figure out how to gain this buy in to focus on whole child education. Sure. It's a beautiful question. I think that, you know, the word voice, Lekisha and your wonderful like acknowledgement, the word voice is really critical and something that I return to again and again and again. And it's not so much in terms of your own voice. It's a shared voice. And it's a really fundamental piece I think that links all of these pieces together because that that is actually how you began to recognize and see one another. That is how you build relationships that Dr. Cantor was talking so eloquently about. That is how people develop agency. The voice is a really fundamental piece of how we do this work and Dr. Lawler has a great example that she just shared with you in terms of what happened in Delaware. I believe that's what's slowly happening in New Mexico. But fundamentally, what does it look like if you're going to change an assessment system in the state, what does it look like if you're going to change a teacher evaluation system in a state, what does it look like if you're going to change a council or a task force to actually set a vision for the state, right? Really fundamentally recognizing voice of those who are most impacted and centering them is maybe the most important thing that you could do and moving outside of your own space for that voice. You're not just expecting voice to come to you, but you're actually going to the community and honoring their voice in their space and seeing who they are and valuing that for them themselves. And I think in that way, I would also say that's why a culturally and linguistically sustainable education is maybe one of the most important pieces of the whole child education. I want to add to that. Yes, please. That it looks like a growth model that even in our evaluation systems, we're focusing on capacity building and educator growth, as opposed to just, you know, looking at performance in the classroom or time get directly to instructional prowess. We shifted our conversations to talk less about buy in and more about commitment, because these are not strategies that are going to take place overnight, but if you're really invested in making a change and seeing a change, that we have to commit to this whole child design, not just, you know, in the short run before the long haul. That's just a really beautiful way Dr. Lawler and this panel discussion, which honestly I could talk to you and Dr. Warniment forever. But thank you so much for that. For leaving us with Dr. Warniment leading us with the importance of voice and recognizing that value and creating relationships, building community, but also agency. And Dr. Lawler, thank you for leading us, leaving us with, it's not about buy in, it's about a commitment to whole child education and so thank you both for your leadership, thank you for your commitment to whole child education and thank you so much for for moving our country forward and for just making sure that our kids are getting what they need to succeed and thrive in school and in life. And with that, I will kick it over it back over to Jen. Thank you, LaKeisha. And thank you to Terry and Glenn LaKeisha I couldn't have said it better. So I'm not going to. That was a really insightful and inspiring conversation. And I want to thank Pam, Dr. Pam cancer again for sharing her knowledge and expertise that was such a powerful presentation. And thank you to our cosponsors ASA castle and the soul alliance. As I said earlier today's webinar is the third and a six part series on transforming state education policy through a whole child approach. A recording of this webinar and the PowerPoint slides will be made available shortly and they will live on our website if you ever need to find them. In our next webinar on March 1 we'll explore how we can build adult capacity and expertise for whole child education and how states are working to support these shifts. And in the chat you'll find a link to learn more about the entire series and register for register for the next webinar. Before you leave we'd appreciate if you could take a minute to complete the survey in the chat. I'd like to thank you all for attending and we hope to see you in March.


Let's go over first to the S&Ps, so we take a look at the spy, what you're going to see out here folks is that you're getting higher price, you're going to have a contraction of volume once again in the marketplace. Right now yesterday you did $77 million, we're at $49, bottom line we'll see whether it can get into the $70 million mark. The S&P, the spy right now, I expect that somehow you're going to get up into this 285, 10 level and what I expect you're going to see is that volume is going to keep contracting and you're setting up the B to C of a much larger ABC structure on the way down. We're going to take a look at the three Q's, same type of setup. Q's out here, you've done 26 million shares today, you popped yesterday, as we popped yesterday you did with $47 million, this will do about $35 million out here today. Gold contract, gold contract caught a huge bid, gave it up on price, we get up to a price point of $13.48, you've done 385,000 contracts, bottom line folks is that when you get to higher highs or lower lows with volume, you go right back top side. What's very well possible here is that we'll back down a bit and just do a monster ABC structure on the way up. Gold's caught a monster bid last four days, we just went from $12.79 to $13.48. Notes and bonds, same setup as notes and bonds. If we take a look at the note and bond market, what you're going to see out here is that the note and bonds, they look like they're just going to, they're a rocket ship here folks. Bottom line is that they back down slightly yesterday, you had some light volume as we back down yesterday, they're pushing into the high today, gave it up on price a bit, 10-year got up to $127.14, you're at $126.31, but best go out. You are pushing into that swing, you have volume as you're pushing into that swing and that's saying that we're going to be right back top side. Kingdala, Kingdala just did the opposite. Kingdala went downtown, monster volume downtown, Kingdala wants lower price. We hit $96.65, you've done 24,000 contracts, that's three days down, lower prices, higher volume, lower prices coming out, it's a good old Kingdala.


That's meadows, that's only two we're missing. We're correct. Chad's here. You know, if they say that the traffic was terrible, we can know that they were lying. Oh, there's Chris. Tisha. Now. All right. Good morning. Welcome to the meeting of the Durham Board of Adjustment will now come to order. Welcome to the May 26th meeting of the City of Durham City County Durham Board of Adjustment. My name is Jacob Rogers. I'm the chair of the board. I'd like to start by acknowledging that we are conducting this meeting using a remote electronic platform. This is the first remote meeting of the Durham Board of Adjustment is permitted by newly enacted session law 2020-3. I would ask for your patience today as we proceed there may be slight delays as we transition between speakers. The Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial body that is governed by the North Carolina General Statutes in the City's Unified Development Ordinance. The board typically conducts evidentiary hearings on request for variances, special use permits, among other requests. Today's meeting will not include any quasi-judicial evidentiary hearings, however. At today's meeting, the board is only approving minutes and orders from the prior meeting. Accordingly, the public is allowed to remotely attend today's Board of Adjustment meeting, but there will not be any participation by members of the public or applicants. Notice of today's meeting was provided by publishing notice in the newspaper and providing notice on the city's website. The notices for today's meeting contain information on how the public can access the remote meeting as the meeting occurs. Today's meeting is being broadcast live on the city's YouTube site and the link to this broadcast is on the website for the Board of Adjustment. All decisions of this board are subject to appeal to the Durham Superior Court. Anyone in the audience other than the applicant who wishes to receive a copy of the formal order issued by this board on a particular case must submit a written request for a copy of that order. So would the clerk like to call the roll? Probably got ahead of myself. Mr. Rogers. Here. Mr. Meadows. Ms. Burnham. Here. Mr. Davis. Present. Mr. Lacey. Present. Mr. Kip. Here. Mr. Regulus. Here. Ms. Jeter. Major. Ms. Waimour. So the people that just waived, you have to unmute yourself and verbally acknowledge that you are there. Meadows here. All right. I want to ask everybody to also please mute your cell phones if you don't mind. Put them on vibrate on the side just in case we don't have any disruptions. So let's see. Well, I'd like is there a motion to approve the minutes from the February 25th meeting that we're in included in our packet? Lacey. Got a motion to approve. Is there a second? Yep, second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Thank you. The next thing on the list, we've got a case. This is going to be an approval of orders for the first case. It's B-1700052. Following people are able to vote to approve this order. Burnham, Davis, Delacey, Kip, Meadows, Rogers, and Wreckless. So is there a motion to approve case B-170052? Delacey, so moved. Second. Is there a second? Wreckless second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? OK. The next is case B-1900050. This is the folks eligible to vote on this one, is Burnham, Davis, Delacey, Kip, and Meadows. So is there a motion to approve? Burnham. Meadows, go ahead. Delacey, second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Thank you. Any opposed? All right. So any old business? Any new business staff? Do you guys have any? That does not have any new business to bring up at this time. Eliza, when they're speaking from the planning department. So we do know that we'll have a meeting on June 23, right? And that could be we're not going to hear any contentious cases.  I can give a brief rundown on those June meetings. For Eliza, when you're speaking for the planning department, sorry about that. For those June meetings, we do have quite a bit of a backlog, as I mentioned in my emails. So we are going to hold two June meetings. We will have one on June 23 at 8.30 and one on June 30 at 8.30 in the morning. Both of those have about seven cases at this time. And we will be advertising for those starting this week. So there is a chance that the case number might decrease, depending upon any input we get from the public going forward. But at this time, there are seven cases per agenda. And they're a mix of single family and commercial. Once we finish those two, we should be caught up pretty well and be back on schedule from our original agenda calendar, and we'll be hearing cases in the order that they've been received during this time. I think we've got confirmations from most of the board members that they will be able to attend both of those, haven't we? From what I've gotten via email, and everyone, thank you for responding. It looks like we'll have most of the board will be at both of those meetings. And I am asking if you're able to come to those meetings for the entire duration, just because, as I mentioned, we've got some people that have been waiting for quite a bit of time to come in before you all. So if you could stay the entire time, that will be great. I do see that Chad has his hand raised. So I'm going to turn the floor over to him. I think he might have a question. Thanks, Eliza. I had two questions. The first one, three questions. The first question is, I assume that the packets will be out, will be coming out, and will be solely in digital format. Is that right? That is correct. So we are not in, none of us are in the city hall at this time. So the ability to go in and print in mail, we have very little amount of time that we're approved to be in city hall. So that would be too much of that time, in which we're allowed to be there. There are other things that we have to do. So they will be solely digital packets for those two meetings, and any meetings going forward until we can get back into a normal schedule being in city hall. Understood. Next question. I think I recall from a prior discussion that we, the board, if we had questions for staff regarding application matters that those needed to be in your hands 24 hours before the next meeting, is that correct? Questions regarding application matters in terms of the information. Yes, so if you have any questions about anything that you've received in your packet, we need to know that before the meeting, just so that we can make sure everyone has the same amount of information. It's not like before we could pass it out, and we're all at the table. So if you have any questions or if there's anything that's not matching up, definitely reach out to myself, Jessica, Cole, or Susan 24 hours beforehand. During those meetings, we each have our own roles, so it'll be really hard to go and grab something for you. Even though it's all digital, it'll be a little bit tougher. So if you have any questions, 24 hours beforehand, please reach out to one of the four of us. And those questions go to you there. We don't copy the rest of the board members.  That's correct. One more. Does everybody know how to use the raise hand feature in Zoom, or could you talk about that so that folks know what to do for the 23rd? Yeah, so thank you. No problem at all. So I'm going to lower chat. In order for us to, as you might have noticed earlier, when we're all speaking within this service, sometimes it can be kind of hard to hear. So in order to kind of keep things running and very fluid so we can hear everyone, we're asking that you all raise your hand, and then one of the staff members will acknowledge your hand and also let Jacob know that, hey, someone has raised their hand. You'll also notice the chat function is not being used during this time. That is something we're asking you all not to use at all unless you, by chance, have a tech issue. And then that would be the only thing we would like for you all to have there. So in order to raise your hand, if you ever go into where there's the participants, is everyone on a web, a computer, I should say, or phone?  I see someone just raised their hand. Hi, Susan. So you can raise your hand and lower your hand in that function. So the way that I just saw Susan's, I can see everyone's. And I'm able to acknowledge as they come in. We're just asking for that because we are having to record these meetings for records for minutes. And once again, it makes it easier if each of us is speaking one at a time as opposed to all at once. And that's all the new business that I have in regards to those two June meetings. So please make sure those are on your calendars for 8.30 on the 23rd and the 30th. Thank you, Eliza. Does anybody have anything else? Questions? I have something to say, but I'm still not figuring out the raised hand part. So I just can't make the 30th meeting. I can make the 23rd. So I just wanted to let you know. I tried to reschedule something, and I couldn't do it. Thank you. All right. Well, thank you all for joining us this morning. And thank you for taking the time and getting this out of the way. I'm sure the folks, the applicants, are glad that we could get this out. Mr. Chairman? Yes, sir. Yes, ma'am. Would the chair entertain a motion to adjourn? I would. I so move. There's a second. Burn on second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. All right, we're adjourned until June 23rd at 8.30 AM. Thank you. Stay safe. Have a good day.