All right, so yesterday we had you have a look at this register form and take it and kind of convert it into the DHS to data model. So actually, here before I proceed too far ahead. I'm just going to make this resource available to you so you can also view it. Okay, so if you go to the tracker terms and data model section. You'll see that I posted this Excel sheet here integrated ANC delivery PNC registry conceptual design. Okay, and this is just going to be actually a filled in sheet with all this information and we're going to use this to kind of review things today. So you can have a look and download that and follow along as we're going through this. So we kind of asked you to have a look at this and decide how to, you know, move it over to the DHS to data model, and also to think about some of the indicators you could potentially form, if you need to maybe separate data sources. And I know that there wasn't enough time for the exercise, I might apologize for that, but it was really kind of to get you in that mode of thinking how you would work through this. So let's say what I'm going to present it's one way to do it doesn't mean it's the only way. Right the thing with tracker programs right it's completely dependent on the procedures that you're following, you know on the routines that are there in your country so me showing one particular way of setting things up. It doesn't mean it's the only way of doing it right there are often multiple ways to do things and not none is right or wrong necessarily. So there are some best practices we can generally follow. Okay, but, you know, depending on the routines that the procedures and everything that you are kind of looking to implement. You know things could be set up a little bit differently, and we'll talk about some of those differences as I go through that. Alright, so the first thing we're going to do if we just review this sheet here and I'll make it bigger so we can all see. The first thing I had you kind of do is look at the track and T attributes and identify the program stages. Alright, so if I have a look at this. I also have some dates here as well, which I know this through some of you off I was kind of jumping between the rooms and just listening in on the conversation. Okay, so we have a couple dates. So we have the enrollment date, which is the date of registration. Okay, and that's just taken from this first column in the form. Okay, this is the date of registration here. And that's going to be the date that we use as our enrollment date. We have this. Sorry, I realized there's quite a few short forms on this form and I probably should have given you the definition of this. This LMP date is called the last menstrual period. This is what initiates a mother coming into the clinic for their ANC visits. So we're using this as the incident date. Now I kind of mentioned in the directions that sometimes you don't need the incident state. There are many programs where it's not necessarily something that is required. Okay, but in this case because we have something that initiates the sequence of events. So we have an incident state. Right. And then, basically, these here are the attributes. This one, I knew this might throw some people off. Okay. And, you know, you might have identified it as an attribute could be theoretically wouldn't be wrong necessarily. But you know I decided to put it in a one of the program stages right rather than have it something that's registered on the person because you know if they come in, if you register them with those details it's not really you know could change right they could have another pregnancy, the data delivery will change. Okay, so, even though it's part of this registration information section it's a bit of a dark horse right you can kind of put it in a different component, depending on what you're doing with your program. So that's what I've laid out here just has a handful of these attributes here. And for the village attribute. Okay I was going through and hearing some of the discussion around this. So I've made village a option set. Okay. And, but I was hearing some of the discussion around some of you had opted to make it an organization unit. Okay, and it could be the case, theoretically, if you're in a very large country, unless they have those villages as organization units set up, you know this could be 10s of thousands of villages perhaps. So you couldn't really set it up as an org unit right because if you use org unit as the value type, then you will have to have those org units in your system. Right. So just kind of keep that in mind when you're setting these types of things up. You could also have it as free text maybe as well. Sometimes it's hard to get your hands on that village list. This would perhaps reduce the amount of usefulness of this attribute, because if you, you know, spell the village name wrong in a couple places you can't really aggregate that data. But you could still use it to just register the individual. Okay, so there's a couple ways you could handle this kind of depending on on what you need to. Right. So the next thing I kind of asked for is identification of the program stages. Okay, so if we have a look at this, there's basically three program stages that we can identify, and they're just split up basically into these headings. So we have the routine ANC visits. And this is one that you know the mother comes back receive ANC services, prior to any of the delivery. Okay, we have the maternity and delivery here. Okay, and then we have the postnatal visit. Okay, now if we look at this sequence of events. So routine ANC visits, it occurs multiple times right and they're receiving the same set of services. So they can come, you know for a first visit a second visit a third visit a fourth visit. You know, now I think the recommendation is, you know, eight visits or more right so they can come multiple times to receive sentinel care. So you could actually just repeat this information. And what we do by repeating this is, you know, we don't have to set up all the data elements and everything over again. It'll just be one program stage with several events. Okay, if we remember from our data model that we discussed the other day. Right, so this stage could be repeated. Right. The other stages occur once in this sequence of events. Yes, the mother can deliver more than once, but you know they would be maybe enrolled in the program again. They're going their second pregnancy. Okay, or third pregnancy. Right. During the sequence of events they only deliver once. Right. So this is a one off event. So there's only, it's not repeated. And the same with the postnatal visit this is a one off event. And they only come once for this postnatal care in this sequence right. So in these cases, these two stages are not repeated. So we generally go through this, you know, we're going through this to kind of decide, you know, how we would actually build this into us too right and for any use case that we kind of are working with, we have to make these types of decisions or kind of have this discussion right to kind of figure out what it is we're going to do. So next thing was identification of the data elements. Now I didn't expect you to actually write all these down. But I've given you in the sheet that you can download from Moodle, just so you can see for reference. Okay, all the different data elements that are part of the different program stages. All right, and I've identified also the option sets that would belong to them. All right, so we can just go through a couple. You know, just see for review. But I saw some of you actually just, you know, you were having no problem with this I think there's more of a time issue right and it can take a bit of time to identify this. So, for each of these programs stages right basically most of these columns are our data elements right and some of them, like this one HIV test result has an option set syphilis results has an option set where you'd select from either positive, negative or unknown. Some of these boxes you have to be a bit careful because each of the programs, each of the events within the program stages will have an event date if you remember we kind of cover this briefly when we were opening up the TV program and reviewing the events within the program stage right. It's something that was covered a bit quickly, but so you might have missed it to be fair. You know, for example this date of visit that could be the event date right doesn't necessarily have to be a date element in the maternity and delivery section though you have two dates. Right, date of delivery and date of discharge. So in all likelihood the date of delivery would be your event date, and the date of discharge would be a separate data element right so when are they discharged from the hospital after the delivery right. If you look at all the events, it's dealing with the delivery itself right mode of delivery the sex of a child the status of the child at birth with the breastfed etc etc right it's all kind of dealing with the delivery and at the end, they're discharged. Okay, so that would be a separate data element in the section, and we could use the date of delivery here as our event date. Now if we look at that postnatal visit. This one can was a bit of a tricky one I guess. So for the most part this this part is pretty straightforward these are data elements, some of them have option sets. And here's the event date right when the mother came for the postnatal care visit. If we look at the family planning options one. Okay, some of you might have identified this as having an option set. But if you look at the options, you have options for both male and female right there's male sterilization male condoms female condoms, and several options for female sterilization right so or other options for for kind of family planning for females. So you could assign more than one of these right at that time, because you could assign something for the father something for the mother, or you could, you know have more than one one method. Fortunately, when you create an option set you can't select, you know multiple options. Okay. So, in order to do this you'd actually have to create all these separate data elements basically under the current model within DHS to. And you can just create tick boxes for example, but you'd have to create each of these options individually because you could assign more than one. Right. So so this one was a bit tricky. I think through you know how it works in DHS to, but you wouldn't necessarily use an option set. So that's what I've identified here. All these different types of family planning methods are identified as yes only data elements essentially right so what that means is it'll show up as a, as a tick box in the data entry screen within DHS to. But next thing is we can look at the sections right and this is not immediately present from the registry itself, but it's something we can use to group the data elements together. So, once again you would probably talk to somebody, you know, within the program, or if you have that expertise to kind of you know make this work a little bit based on what you're seeing. These headings are split up on the kind of registry itself the paper registry. Okay, but when you're in DHS to it's you can also kind of further kind of section check section off these these various items, just to make it a bit easier and group things together for the person entering data. So if we look at some of this, you know, some of these are closely related like here weight height and blood pressure pressure for example, we're taking some you know vital markers of the mother to kind of understand, you know her current health situation right. We have some lab results lab tests for running on HIV and syphilis. And then we have these here. These are kind of prophylaxis methods for deworming for malaria, LLIN is a long lasting sector cycle and that's an iron right so they're kind of prophylaxis methods that we can kind of group together. This requires some knowledge of course so of the delivery of the program itself so it might not always be immediately apparent, right, but we can when working with others, try to identify, you know how to section these off. I'm just kind of sectioned off some of them here. And this is, you know, for when you create the data entry form, you know, you could essentially section them off the same way. Okay. And you can just have a look like all the family planning methods are grouped together. All the different status of the child. So if we go to the next section here, right the sex the status the weight the length. And once again, this is one way to present it. There's no right or wrong way here. Absolutely right. I'm just showing sharing, you know, something we typically come up with, but how it's actually structured, you know, that's that could be very different depending on your needs and your requirements and, and how you use this information. Right. So I'm just giving you an example here, but you could section it off differently, and that would not be incorrect necessarily. Okay. So we'll just have a couple indicators here. And I wanted to kind of talk about, you know, this, because it's quite important to try and identify these. There's just a couple here.  Actually, we could extract from the program data we have based on what we're seeing, but I just wanted to extract a few just to discuss them right. So so we can have kind of very simple ones that just take the exact data from from the registry and kind of create counts, you know, so we could get a count of still burst we could get a count of the number of vacuum extraction. You know, delivery by vacuum extraction, the number of HIV positive test results right we could count each of these things for any of these parameters that we're seeing. Right. And that is one way to kind of define basic indicators about this is just to kind of create aggregations create counts from our individual data. Right. The other way we can look at this though is combining those with other parameters whether it be population data, or whether it be ratios or rates within the information that we're currently collecting. For example, ANC for coverage or ANC for plus coverage. So there's one option here. Right. ANC visit. Sorry, that should be for plus I guess. Okay. And we could count the number of ANC fourth visits, right. But then we would have a denominator for that for coverage, right. And you know, in this case I put expected number of pregnancies right. It's not actually something we would collect in our tracker data. Right, this is an external variable, we would have an estimate of the number of expected pregnancies within a certain period, whether it be, you know, maybe for a year, for example, we have that number that you know is calculated through surveys or other types of demographic tools that would be made available to us and we could use as our denominator. Right. And the same thing here I've identified here in these cesarean sections. So just to have a look at two different methods of looking at data. Right. So one is taking the total number of libraries that have been recorded. Right. And you can take that from your tracker data right from here. Right. By counting the number of cesarean sections where the baby is alive. Right. So you would combine information from these two columns. Okay. And then you know you'd have a denominator where you're just taking the number of children that are alive right to get a proportion. Right and you could do the same thing though using the estimated life first right and this might be some other demographic information that you pull in from another system or another source. Okay. So when you're thinking about or thinking through these things you know it's often useful to think will not just not just about okay. When I'm looking at the program directly. This is the information I have right in front of me. And these are the things I can do with it. But you can also think you know DHS to you know quite allows you to pull in that information from other sources it's quite a powerful tool to kind of create this this kind of analysis across these different you know variables. So you can also use you know different denominators depending on the program you need for example to create calculations. You can combine data across the program right so in this example we're combining data from you know the type of delivery whether it's a C section or not, and whether or not the child is alive. Right so you don't have to have single parameters all the time. And then you know you can use different denominators based on what's available to you at hand and what you are calculating and what you need to do. Okay, so the whole idea about this was just to kind of think through that a little bit because it's quite important right and often when you write down your indicators as Brian kind of mentioned in this presentation right the configuration needs to match right. If you say okay I need this indicator calculated, but you're not collecting the information or you don't have the denominator available, then it's going to be different difficult for you. So you have to kind of make sure that's incorporated into your design. When you're thinking through this a little bit more right. So lastly we have the option sets, and I've just laid them all out for you. I didn't expect you guys to get through all of this, but just so you can kind of see where they're taken from. It's just, you know these fields that have lists here, for example the mode of delivery has normal vaginal delivery vacuum extraction cesarean section, the final diagnosis has all these different types of diagnosis that I could potentially select from. Some people asked about this yes and no type of variable right to a trade an option set for yes or no. And that kind of depends. Okay, I often do actually because I, it makes it easy for me to count the nose. Which might be a bit of a strange concept the way I'm explaining it, but there is a yes no data type within DHS to okay, so you could use that and it would not be incorrect. Okay. There is you could create an option set for this. Okay, so an option set being yes no as well. It just kind of depends, you know, how you want to use that data right so for me I find it quite easy to aggregate the option set so that's why I often use it, but using a yes data type or a yes only data type is also correct theoretically just depending on you know how you want to use that thing. So we would go through this whole process before we do anything in DHS to and you know did this is generally true of any use case that we would kind of take part in right and this is just kind of documenting the kind of. We haven't gone through and documented all the requirements necessarily actually what we're doing is, I mean, the indicators and the metadata is really what we've done in this exercise. As you go through more parts of the configuration, you know, we'll talk about some other requirements that you would be thinking about, you know, as you're kind of going through this as well. Right. But you know it's a start right and we really have to kind of think about these things before we go into DHS to save us a lot of time and makes everything clear. And also you know for anyone who's not necessarily a DHS to expert, but they might be a program expert of some kind we might have a lot to contribute from service delivery side, you know it helps them to understand they're actually, you know how things are going to be laid out. And when you can review it with them in this way you know they're probably used to seeing stuff, you know it can develop workflow or an Excel sheet or things like that right things that are kind of people are familiar with right. And it helps to kind of do it this way rather than present something in an overtly technical manner. All right. So, so yeah, we've gone through this process at a kind of rapid pace. And often this this might take a little bit longer in practice to do. You know there might be a bit more back and forth between the people kind of developing for implementing this inside of DHS to and you know the people that are kind of responsible for the service delivery aspect the subject matter experts who kind of understand what indicators and data need to be calculated from this etc etc. But, and there could be a back and forth right I will also say, sometimes it's not perfect when you start. Right, so you define everything and you think all this looks great.  And that's often the case, especially when it's kind of conceptual to begin with right people don't really. You know that experience DHS to person might have some idea what the end product might look like. But you know, for the most part it's kind of hard to conceptualize for a lot of people until they see it on their screen and then they can make adjustments as necessary so there is a bit of back and forth here, as you deal with this design process. All right. But yeah just try to you know when you're thinking about it in the future. And you're kind of working on these types of programs, you know, go through this process of kind of making sure that you've identified you know, to the extent you can right, don't let the perfection be the enemy of actually, you know moving along. But, you know, to the extent you can have identified you know some of these requirements, and you know, you can refer to this then, you know when you're building something inside of DHS to. All right. So if there are any questions about this topic. I know there's been some activity in the chat here. Okay. You can also ask us on slab. Okay, about any of this. All right, so we're going to kind of keep reinforcing this concept as we go through the various sessions so it's not the last few seen of this conceptual design. But we do want to kind of use it now to actually design our program inside DHS to. So that's going to be the focus of today. So if there are any questions about this, let us know.


Today's lecture we will study Euler graphs and Hamiltonian graphs first Euler graphs if some closed walk in a graph contains all the edges of the graph then the walk is called an Euler line the graph is called an Euler graph now here we have to remember that the way we define walk it means that the vertices can be repeated but edges cannot be repeated so essentially I need a I need to traverse on the graph in such a way that I start from one point and come back to that same point so I have got a closed walk and in between I can come to a vertex more than once but I cannot repeat edges for example if I have a graph like this then of course it is a Euler graph because I can start from this point and then come back and come back over here I can attach another circuit over here and the complete thing is again a Euler graph because I can start let us say from this vertex come like this then move like this then move like this move like this move like this this and this so I get a closed walk which covers all the edges now there is one question that by looking at a graph can I quickly determine whether it is a it is an Euler graph or not the answer is surprisingly easy and it was proved by Euler who lived from 1707 to 1783 so Euler 1707 to 1783 prove the following a given connected graph G is an Euler graph if and only if vertices of G of even degree now the question is why now I will only give a sketch of the proof now let us suppose that I have an Euler graph let us suppose a graph like what we have seen before so what happens there is that I start from a vertex and then go to another vertex when I come to this vertex since it is an Euler graph I must be able to get out of it to another vertex from this also I should be able to get out of it and then like this so whenever I am entering a vertex I must have I must be able to get out of it through another edge and ultimately I come back to the original edge so in the original edge I go out like this wherever I come in I get out through another edge so always the edges are coming in pairs and eventually I am coming back to the original vertex this is why if I have an Euler graph then each vertex has to be has to have a even number as its degree now the connectedness is also assumed because of course otherwise I can have some isolated points but I am not considering that I am just considering connected graphs the question is that whether it is true in the converse direction that means suppose I have a graph with each element sorry each vertex have an having even degree will it be an Euler graph the answer is yes and the proof goes like this that suppose I start from a start from a vertex of that of a graph whose degrees are even so then I can always move out to another vertex let us say from V1 to V2 and from V2 I can move to another vertex let us say V3 because whenever I get in I will always have a different edge to get out because the vertices are of even degree and in this way if I start moving around then eventually I will come to V1 now the question is that whether I have covered all the edges now if I have covered all the edges then already I have got an Euler line but suppose I have not covered all the edges that means there are some edges left and there are so I have to search here some vertex where the degree is more than one suppose sorry more than two so suppose in the vertex V3 the degree is more than two that means there are some other edges coming out of it what I can do is that I can cut this graph out and start from V3 again and start traversing the graph I will do that and eventually I will come to V3 again I ask the same question suppose I have covered all the edges then then I have got an Euler line because I can go like this up to V3 and take this route and then like this move like this this and come back and if it if it if it does not cover all the edges then there will be somewhere in one of the in one of the vertices which has got degree more than two I can again start from that vertex and cover so in this way I can construct a Euler line therefore we have got a very nice characterization of Euler graphs a graph G is an Euler graph if and only if all vertices of G are of event degree this theorem has a very famous application which is called Konigsberg bridge problem and in fact Euler developed this theorem to solve Konigsberg bridge problem and in the process wrote the first paper in graph theory two islands C and D formed by the Pregel river in Konigsberg where connected each other the banks a and b by seven bridges so we draw the configuration we got a river flowing across a river across a city Konigsberg and the city is developed on both sides of the river and there are two islands so the banks are a and b which I shade over here and two islands C and D which are also shaded the islands are connected by bridges and there are some bridges connecting the banks to the islands so these are the bridges now the question is whether one can start from one of the banks or islands and traverse through the bridges traverse through each of the bridges exactly once and come back to the same point now people before Euler we are trying to solve this problem and did not get an answer what Euler proved is that this scenario can be mapped to a graph theoretic problem and then by the theorem that he proved the theorem that we saw just now it is absolutely clear that you cannot have an Euler line and hence it is not possible to traverse through all the bridges exactly once and come back to the same point now if we want to transform this problem to a graph theoretic problem then we get something like this the vertices are labeled as A, B, C, D corresponding to the land masses and the bridges by the edges so A to C there is one bridge and this is the second bridge C to B there is one bridge and this is the second bridge A to D we have got one bridge and B to D there is one bridge and there is a bridge connecting C to D what we see here is a degree of A is 3 degree of D is also 3 and so on so of course all the vertices are not of even degree so no question of getting an Euler line and therefore no question of being able to traverse each bridge exactly once starting from one of the land masses and coming back to the same land mass now as a consequence of the first theorem there is another theorem which I state without a proof it states that a connected graph G is an Euler graph if and only if can be decomposed into circuits so this is again another result which is more or less obvious so I leave it to you for proofs now as we have seen that this problem of whether a graph is an Euler graph or not has got a very concrete and definite answer there is another problem which is which sounds similar but which has been elusive from the beginning till now for that we come to the idea of Hamiltonian paths and circuits a circuit in a graph G is said to be Hamiltonian if it includes every vertex of G alternatively a Hamiltonian circuit in a connected graph is defined as a closed walk that traverses every vertex of G exactly once now what is a Hamiltonian path Hamiltonian path is an open walk in a graph G which traverses every vertex of G exactly once now if a graph has a Hamiltonian circuit then we will call that graph a Hamiltonian graph if a graph a Hamiltonian circuit then we will call it a Hamiltonian graph now let us look at some examples of Hamiltonian graph if we have a cycle like this of course this is a Hamiltonian graph because I can move like this this and this and come back so it is I have moved through all the vertices exactly once and come back to the same vertex now if I have something like this then it is not a Hamiltonian graph because let us say if I start from here I can come here here and I can come back over here but if I go from here to somewhere over here then I can never come back I can try from so whenever I reach over here I have no way that is here I have no way of going anywhere except for repeating one vertex so I do not have a Hamiltonian path sorry I do not have a Hamiltonian circuit but see I have a I have a Hamiltonian path because I can always start from here come here then traverse like this and traverse like this so I can traverse all the vertices exactly once so I have a by an open path so I have a I have a Hamiltonian path but I do not have a Hamiltonian circuit now there are some graphs for which we know that there are Hamiltonian circuits one famous graph is called a complete graph a simple graph in which there exists an edge between every pair of vertices is called a complete graph a complete graph with n vertices is denoted by k sub n a complete graph with n vertices is denoted by k sub n so well if we have K2 K2 is simply this K3 is simply a cycle and K4 is a graph like this now we can ask a question that what is the number of edges in a complete graph now the answer goes like this that if I have a complete graph then I can choose any two distinct vertices and I am sure to have an edge between those two vertices and a single edge because after all the graph is a simple graph therefore the number of edges is exactly equal to number of ways I can choose two objects from n objects which is n choose two and which is equal to n into n-1 divided by 2 so I can write that the total number of edges in a complete graph is n into n-1 divided by 2 now we will also note that a complete graph is Hamiltonian the reason is that I can always start from any vertex let us say I start from 1 and then I go to 2 and from 2 I will always be able to go to 3 because 2 3 are connected and like that I can keep on going up to n supposing that the complete graph is with n vertices and I have labeled the vertices from 1 to n and then from n I will always be able to come back to 1 so for example if we take K4 given above so here this is 1 and then suppose this is 2 then suppose this is 3 and from 3 I can always go to 4 this is 4 and I can always come back to 1 so thus it is complete and this works for any this works for any complete graph so the one Hamiltonian path is 1 2 3 4 5 and like that up to n and then n connected to 1 so I can ask a question now that how many edge disjoint Hamiltonian paths are there in a complete graph and we have a definite answer to that which is as follows so for n odd and n greater than or equal to 3 for a complete graph with n vertices we have got exactly n-1 divided by 2 edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits now the question is how do we prove it if we think in this way that a Hamiltonian circuit in a graph with n vertices will have n edges a Hamiltonian circuit in a graph in a complete graph or basically in any graph in a graph with n vertices has n edges now I am looking for the number of edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits in a complete graph a complete graph as we have already seen as n x n-1 divided by 2 many edges a complete graph with n vertices has n x n-1 divided by 2 many edges therefore since we are looking for edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits the maximum number of edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits that a complete graph with n vertices can have is n x n-1 divided by 2 the whole thing divided by n so the maximum number of edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits in a complete graph is 1 by n x n n-1 divided by 2 so n by 2 n-1 by 2 now so we know the maximum number possible and our result says that that is exactly the number of distinct edge disjoint Hamiltonian circuits now how do we prove that and we take a way of writing the graph we start from 1 go to 2 from 2 we will go to 3 and from 3 we will come back to 4 then we will move to 5 and then we will move to 6 from 6 I will go to 7 from 7 to 8 from 8 to 9 and 9 I will go back to 1 and these vertices can be thought of being on a circle so we get a Hamiltonian circuit as 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 5 sorry 3 to 4 4 to 5 then 5 to 6 6 to 7 7 to 8 8 to 9 and 9 to 1 and what we will observe that instead of going from 1 to 2 if I go from rotate this whole thing and go from 1 to 3 and do similar things then we will get another Hamiltonian circuit and maximum number of times I can do is 1 2 3 4 in this case so I can get 4 distinct Hamiltonian circuits and that is the maximum number of circuits possible because 4 is equal to 9-1 by 2 in general if n is odd then this number will be n-1 by 2 and by writing the vertices in such a way we can show that we can get all the n-1 by 2 many distinct that is Hamiltonian circuits now we end today's lecture by stating one sufficient condition for a graph to be a Hamiltonian graph a sufficient condition for a simple graph to have a Hamiltonian circuit is that the degree of every vertex in G be at least n by 2 when n is the number of vertices of G now this was proved by Dirac in a paper entitled connectivity theorem for graphs published in quarterly Journal of Maths series 2 volume 3 1952 171 to 174 now a word of question this is a sufficient condition we know that if a graph has this property then definitely it will have a Hamiltonian path but there are graphs sorry if a graph has this property then definitely it will have a Hamiltonian circuit but there are graphs which are Hamiltonian that is which have Hamiltonian circuits but which do not satisfy this property this is the end of today's lecture thank you


Internal Revisors are as tax news tax time guide things to consider when filing a 2022 tax return Tax time is a good time for contemplation questions naturally arising such as When in the world did this get so dang complicated? What why do they need to know that?  Is the government actually spying on me?  It's just a video. Why does it bother you man? Say the irs does like the same thing. They're like, yeah, we're tracking every transaction You make over 600 dollars talking to your customers enforcing them to give us documentation on your business transactions Why is it? Why is it upset you bro? Why does it bother you, man? We're just tracking everywhere.  We're just seeing where it goes Why is it bother you?    I care because I care. That's why I care Okay, phil I swear I swear phil I'm gonna take that cell phone and throw it right out the window. I'm telling you Oh great. Oh great Now Phil's posting a video to tick tock labeled toxic male aggression gone wild You see you see the This is exactly what I'm talking about Honestly phil that can't be good for business marketing strategy. I mean, it's clearly not lined up to our mission statement phil No, I see phil you don't care Mission statements don't matter. It's all about the cause All about the cut honestly feel like I'm still dealing with the fallout of the last time you put the crazy mob hit on my head For playing that new harry potter video game But whatever Yes, phil i'm still playing the harry potter video game. It's great.  It's just a game.   It's not working Possibly because phil already looks ridiculous. I know Unridiculous Unridiculous It's not working. I should have studied my magic more help her. My any help IR 2023-32 february 22nd 2023 washington with the 2023 tax filing season in full swing the internal revenue service Reminds taxpayers to gather their necessary information and visit irs.gov irs.gov For updated resources and tools There's a link to those here to help with their 2022 tax return This news release is part of a series called the tax time guide. There's a link to that A resource to help taxpayers file an accurate tax return Additional guidance is available in publication 17 your federal income tax for individuals Things to consider before filing taxpayers should wait to file until they receive all their proper documents There's a link to that here or they risk making a mistake. They could cause delays So obviously for more basic tax returns Most of it will be document driven such as the w2s and the 1099s and so on and as we know The government also is going to receive those forms. That's the point so when they are the idea of the tax code it's an income tax system And that means income is kind of bad for taxes The government has an incentive to try to double check your income The way they often do that is to put the pressure where they have the leverage in a business transaction Where one side is paying therefore has a deduction or expense the other side has income They have the leverage on the person that is paying So generally they go to the person paying in a business transaction and force them to give documentation Not only to you but to the irs in the form of w2s and 1099s And might also force them to have withholdings as well Therefore if you put something on your tax return that doesn't line up with the documentation provided to the government It doesn't take them like an audit or any real Effort to see that it doesn't line up to the documentation that they got you'll almost surely have a delay And whatnot going forward therefore You want to make sure that you have the documentation you need in order to file a proper return If you're looking to get your refund as fast as possible You also want to be careful when you get some forms like a 1099s from like Your investments and stuff like that sometimes they they say on it That it's going to be like this is a a preliminary estimate that might be subject to change or something like that Which means it's probably going to change, you know So you might want to wait and make sure that you've got the final documentation for any kind of investment statements Before filing as well because obviously on the payer side the people issuing the 1099s and the w2s They have deadlines so they're trying to get those things out You know on time before the deadline so that they don't get hit with penalties and interest So they should also review their documents carefully if any of the information is inaccurate or missing tax payers should contact the payer Right away for a correction or to ensure the issuer has their current mailing or email address So if the documentation is wrong and someone gives you a 1099 that's inaccurate Then the problem is the government has that as well So if you try to file a tax return that is accurate, but that is not in the same number as I was on the 1099 Then it's likely that the irs is going to going to question it now You might have to do that But but you want to first try to get the correction happening by going to the issuer of the 1099 You can't do it from the irs's side because they're just they're not the one issuing So they're going to it'll take a longer of a process to do that You're going to try to first fix it on the issuer side and say hey you messed up. You gave me a 1099.  It's really causing me problems. Would you please? Fix it because the irs thinks I have this income It's causing me problems, right? That's so Don't call them a jerk because that might make it that might Complicate things, but you know what I mean because it could kind of cause problems Created an irs online account. There's a link to that here can help taxpayers secure access information about their federal tax account Including payments tax records and more so you want to set up that online account I would think would be coming more and more relevant going forward in the future given the fact that they're trying to update their online access and be electronic and whatnot and try to get to where other business Organizations are at banks being quite Good with their online resources and tools still highly a lot better than the irs in my opinion Organized tax records make preparing complete and accurate tax returns easier and may help taxpayers find an overlooked deduction or credit So obviously if you have your taxes All the documents scattered all over The floor it might be a little bit more difficult than if you kind of organize and maybe if they're on the floor But you like put them in in stacks that you know how you know how they're lined up on the floor instead of just like randomly Then that's the kind of organ but in the case taxpayers with an individual taxpayer identification number or iten There's a link to that here may need to renew it If it's expired and is needed on a us federal tax return If they don't renew an expiring or expired iten the irs can still accept their return But it may delay processing or credits owed So you want to have the updated ID number because you are a number to the irs and you have to know what that number is Now if you if you have an old number then the iris would still like you to file rather than not be in compliance You would think that would be how the structure would be set up But then of course it could have caused a delay because the number is not current changes to credits and deductions for tax year 2022 unlike 2020 and 2021 There were no new stimulus payments for 2020 So taxpayers should not expect to get an additional payment in their 2023 tax refund so The stimulus payments that went out were like those those payments that they just kind of went out during kovid and those were linked to the 2020 and 2021 tax returns now if those stimulus payments went Correctly and everything worked out then you didn't really have to do anything on your taxes but if there was a problem with them then you had to To uh recover that problem or correct it with the recovery rebate credit We don't have any of that stuff in 2022 And therefore it should be easier in that case because we don't have to that whole stimulus thing going on Although we do have other kind of prepayments that they've been messing around with Which is the prepayment for like the prepaid insurance for the healthcare marketplace kind of situation and uh, and what's the main one any case however Taxpayers may still qualify for temporarily Expanded eligibility of the premium tax credit a refundable credit that helps eligible individuals and families cover the premiums for their health insurance Purchased through the health uh insurance marketplace So that's the one I was talking about to get this credit taxpayers must meet certain requirements and file a tax return With form eight nine six two premium tax credit. So they've been experimenting with these kind of strategies They did it with the child tax credit last year and whatnot where they try to give an advanced payment And then try to estimate what the actual credit will be given it out in advance So they still do that with the premium tax credit Obviously the idea is that they're trying to get the money out there faster But it also that makes it a lot more complex right because now people tend to not really understand what's happening with these uh with the with the Payments that they're making for their health insurance Because they they they actually go and get the payment calculation for how much they owe for insurance And it's it's hard to kind of connect the fact that that the premium was reduced by the credit that was estimated to happen And so you actually it's kind of like you got a payment and then you pay down The premium with the payment that you got from the government for a credit that was given But it kind of looks like you're just paying The whatever the premium is that happens to be a lot lower Than other than other premiums right so that it actually kind of complicates The you know the thought process of what people are doing and then at the end of the year You have to kind of figure out how much you've got from the premium credit actually calculate the credit Compare the two see if you got an overpayment of the credit or underpayment And see if you still get a benefit when you file the tax returns or if you actually owe some money because you got overpaid on it They also did some funny things in prior years as well where they kind of waived I believe they waived if you if you got overpayment of the credit And they kind of waived it which again is some weird It's kind of a weird incentive because that would incentivize people To try to lie about the credit or or at least overestimate Their how low their income is going to be so they get a bigger credit which is a prepayment and then Get their insurance lowered by more and then hope that the government just waives the fact That you you didn't have as big a credit as anyways So it's kind of complicated also eligibility rules change to claim a clean vehicle credit under the inflation reduction acts We've been talking about the inflation reduction act a lot nothing with regards to inflation reduction or anything But you know all all the stuff that's actually in the bill. We've been talking about it We've seen it come up a bunch So some tax credits return to the 2019 levels This means that taxpayers will likely receive a significantly smaller refund Compared to the previous tax year so obviously what has been happening during the covet time is when covet My interpretation when covet first happened and they kind of panicked and and they and they took action I think they kind of overextended but they you could see they first took action and By closing people's businesses and stuff like that So you can think that yeah, well that would make sense if the economy is going to be hit that hard That they send out stimulus payments and whatnot and then after that it seemed like they kind of extended the emergency To to be able to give out more stimulus payments and whatnot because now that's I think that's politically popular thing to do So it seems to me that they extended this amount of money just flowing out of the government Further than what was needed for the actual emergency for political reasons They didn't want to turn off the tap because it's going to be unpopular to do that But at some point they got to turn off the tap Because it's unsustainable to just do that. So now of course That some of the stuff is bouncing back to the prior emergency levels and People are going to be upset with that and whatnot. It's going to be changes to two things and That's so that's where we're at at this point in time So changes include amounts for the earned income tax credit the e itc The child tax credit the ctc and the child independent care credits So the earned income tax credit they adjusted it. That's one of the lower income Tax brackets that are based in part by income and they had all these other rules that you can use Different years of income to try to maximize the credit and whatnot the child tax credit They had a huge increase on it and they were really Really proud of that one and they sent out half of it in advance and they were touting that Through from the rooftops, but they couldn't that's so that's not happening again Then the child dependent care credit as well So they're going to go back to basically the pre-covid levels So for the e itc eligible taxpayers with no children who received roughly $1,500 in 2021 Will now get $560 for the 2022 tax year those who got $3,600 per dependent in 2021 for the ctc child tax credits Will if eligible get $2,000 per dependent for the 2022 tax year The child independent care credit returns to a maximum of $2,100 in 2022 instead of $8,000 in 2021 finally Taxpayers that don't itemize and take the standard deduction Cannot deduct their charitable contributions this year They had a pretty small amount of charitable contributions that are usually on the itemized deductions that they pulled over To the first page of the form 1040 so they kind of played around with that one as well But it wasn't that big of a dollar like $300 so transactions a transaction year for 1099 k reporting there are no changes to what counts as income or how it is calculated Including income from the sale of personal assets taxpayers must report all their income on their tax return Unless it's excluded by law form 1099 k payments cards and third party network transactions is an irs information return Used to report certain payment transaction and helps to improve voluntary tax compliance. Now this is I think this is something like with the irs that we need to we need to kind of Look at a little bit more closely on how we want the irs to be working because notice they're mentioning here the voluntary Uh tax compliance system. That's basically what an income tax is and obviously if everybody's quite content And everybody's you know feels that the the government's doing what they're doing Correctly and whatnot Then people ideally would actually kind of want to file be proud To file their taxes and pay for the military and the protection that is provided and and everything but of course when when the Government it's felt that they're wasting money Or that you're being the money's being taken through compulsion or when the taxes get too high Then of course people get uh get annoyed At the taxes so it used to be in a voluntary kind of tax system That you basically reported your income tax on the 1040 without all the kind of oversight There was a there is you know still oversight But the system that used to be used was kind of like a system that's kind of like when you're driving on the freeway Where they would say we're going to have random audits We're going to audit randomly and if we audit you we're going to dig into your numbers And if you didn't pay your taxes, then we're going to hit you with a with a bill for not paying your taxes That means they're not going to catch everyone But the idea is there's audits out there Everybody knows just like there's policemen out there that if you get hit you could have a significant ticket That's going to be large enough for most people to self comply to fall into compliance. That's the general idea More and more they seems that they're moving from that system To the iris wants to be able to basically be able to create The tax return without voluntary tax compliance Because most people the iris can actually make the tax return probably on their end without voluntary compliance Because they're getting all the documentation By forcing the payer on the payer side of the transaction To provide them with the documentation that makes it easier. I get it that makes it So that more people are going to comply because obviously they don't really have a choice because obviously It's not really a compliance system. And so it means that more people are in compliance I think more people should be in compliance. That's good but It's also quite more intrusive Than the the other system the other way of doing it. So instead of having audits all the time Where someone's bait where they have random audits They just know exactly what you earned because they they're right up in your nose. They're right up in your business They know what was spent more and more so they don't need to do the audits the audits being done By the fact that they forced the the w2s the withholdings the 1099s and that stuff So so they they kind of act like it's still a voluntary system But it's not as much a voluntary system. And I think that's kind of something that we need to be like It's interesting to develop and we need to be more aware of it And you can see it clearly on those areas that they don't have a lock on such as the gig work economy Which now is being driven by a platform It's like a new silk road connecting business people that want to have a business And customers that want to pay for the business And then you so you don't have anywhere that the government can latch on to and say because it's the end user You can't have someone charge you can't force someone who's buying a pizza To to charge the pizza delivery company For for the 1099 right because they're not a business So so you can't charge someone who's getting their hair cut You know to make to give a 1099 to the person that cut their hair Whereas you can force somebody that's working for another business if I made a part For a large business then that business would 1099 me So the IRS is saying well, how can we get those guys? How can we get those people? Well, we can make the we can make the intermediary platforms the pay pals or whatnot or the credit card companies Or possibly the intermediary platforms that they're connecting to make them either an employee Or force them to issue 1099s And you can see again why they would want to do that it would increase compliance increase people reporting taxes In which people should report the taxes, but it's probably going to dampen the the amount of Of gdp growth the company is going to be more regulations less competition Because of the more regulations less ease for people to get into the marketplace because now they got to deal with a higher bureaucracy Which leads to more likely a monopoly at some point in time In certain industries and whatnot So I think these kind of issues are You know, they don't get talked about a lot, but I think they're kind of interesting to look at so taxpayers use this information to return With their their other tax records to determine their correct tax liability. So 2022 forms 1099 K should have been furnished to the payee by uh, january 31st 2023 So then you got the american rescue plan of 2021 Changed the reporting threshold for third party settlement organizations including payment apps and online settlement organizations The new threshold requires reporting of transactions in excess of 600 dollars per year 600 dollars. Are you kidding me? And so so obviously the other side of that is just the fact that the irs is tracking, you know, they're they're tracking You know, you have to report the information that's over a pretty low threshold And they're they're actually talking to the people, of course That you are that are your clients, right that you're doing business with which it seems quite intrusive Obviously the iris's argument would always be Well, it's just we're just looking at the for taxes. That's it. We're not doing anything else trust us We we wouldn't use it for any other means or anything like that But I you know, I mean my trust only goes so far And it's gone down a lot these so I I tend to say, you know, they're going a little too far in my opinion or way too far But again changed from the previous threshold of an excess of 20 000 dollars and an excess of 200 transactions per year So third party settlement organizations are required to report payments for goods and services On december 23rd 2022 the irs announced the calendar year 2022 will be treated as a transaction year A transition year for the reduced reporting threshold of 600 dollars a transition year Those that's always scary words, you know, it's a transition. Haven't we been transitioning for like the last 20 years? Don't worry. Don't worry. It's just a we're transitioning this time It's that's why because that's just an excuse of why things aren't quite rolling the way they should be It seems often common excuse. Don't worry. It's just a transit Anyways, even though the form 10 99 k reduced reporting requirements for third party settlement organizations to delay is delayed Some individuals may still receive a form 10 99 k who have not received one in the past Some individuals may receive a form 10 99 k for the sale of personal items or in situations where they received a 10 99 k in error Ie for transactions between friends and family or expense sharing now. This is where it gets kind of messy because if these third party platforms like the the credit card companies And the pay pals of the worlds and whatnot are responsible for the 10 99s If they get it wrong because you're just transferring money to a friend or family Then you're going to get it. You might get a 10 99 and that would mean that the irs gets a 10 99 And that you'd have to report it on your income tax return or the iris is gonna I'm gonna come back at you or whatever And that causes a problem because then if you want to get that fixed You have to go to the issuer of the 10 99 before you can file your tax return So that you can report it on your income tax without the thing on the 10 99 because the 10 99 was wrong So anyways Money received as a gift or to reimburse shared meals or rent should not report it on a 10 99 k Payments should indicate whether they are personal to family and friends or a business transaction for goods and services So if the information is incorrect on the form 10 99 k taxpayers should contact the payer immediately The payer's name appears in the upper left corner of the form The taxpayers should keep a copy of the correspondence with the payer with their records So if a form 10 99 k is received in error and a corrected form 10 99 k can't be obtained Follow the irs updated guidance at understanding form 10 99 k. So there's links to all that stuff here. There'll be a link to this in the description


Hi everyone, Joe for jazzy's casebreaks.com coming at you with 2023 hip-rate football autographed limited edition Series 27 dual case break number one As most of you know some of you didn't but as most of you know each case 10 boxes each 20 boxes total You know one car per box some really nice stuff. That's a potentially what we can get out of here Big thanks to this group for getting in on the action They're all the teams right there congrats again to the people when they're spot in that mosaic football pack number 45 All right, let now let's roll it. Let's randomize it four and a five nine times one two three four five six seven eight and nine You got Chad B down to Lucas After nine Four and a five nine time well if you've seen one janna odd then it must be true Three four five six seven eight and nine Seattle down to Kansas City Chad with the Seahawks Justin with the Colts Matthew with the Bears Matthew with the Packers as well Andrew with the Jets Damien with the Panthers Allen with the Steelers and Bills Mark with the Vikings Michael with the Niners Ryan with the Commanders Stephen K with the Titans Scott with the Texans Carl with the Cowboys Matthew with the Rams Karen with the Saints Carl with the Cleveland Browns Tristan with the Buccaneers Tana with the Lions Adam with the Falcons Damien with the Dolphins Climb with the Broncos Raymond with the Eagles Adam with the Jags James with the Giants and my Raiders Tyler with the Ravens Andrew with the Bangles Aaron with the Patriots Scott with the Chargers Damien with the Cardinals Lucas with the Kansas City Chiefs All right, that was nine times nine times and four and five is not just making sure I got that right All right, let's alphabetize by team and we're going to pause the video just for a little bit when we come back We're going to see if there's any trades and then we'll have the break took around BRB All right. Welcome back everybody. No deals were done TWC trade window closed So thanks everybody for hanging with me on a Thursday Thanks everybody dual case breaks, so we're going to do Case 10 of 10 and this one's one of 10 series 27 limited autograph NFL Good luck everybody Good luck. Just one out of the gate Will be It's going to be Daniel Jones 60 out of 75 rookie autograph Daniel Jones That's going to go to James and the giant peach Nothing to do with Saquon. I feel like the Raiders are waiting to see what New York does with Saquon before they figure out what they're going to do with Josh Shaco's just signed Josh Shaco's No, it's tough. The running back value is not that great, but it can't not happen Staying in New York this time Jets Garrett Wilson 38 out of 99 rookie jersey an autograph from the limited Andrew with the J ETS Jets Jets Jets We got a book book it It's james cook. It's a cookbook rookie signature locker five out of 25 a james cookbook from playbook That's for Alan Matsui in the bills buffalo Right. Yeah, I think that was just a one-year deal. Maybe I think he wants a multi-year deal, which is job security John Mechie the third To 149. That's for the Texan. That's for Scott Josh Jacobson is in a similar position. They Franchise tagged him, but they didn't he has not signed the franchise tender He's holding out for a long-term deal, which is what Saquon's going to do It's about job security. Does he want to go and win something? well, if he wants to win He'll take far less money And tell the front office. Hey make sure you put it Make sure you evenly distribute that money to improve the team as much as possible It's michael vick flashback autographs to 75 Adam with the atl the dirty birds Take one to the bears. All right That's definitely a sign of him not wanting to win And bears are a little ways away Now the running back shelf life, unfortunately is It's quite short on average A lot of running backs want to try to get as many years as possible in their deal There's travisette tan jr. Dual relic and autograph Jaguars that's going to be for adam cupram You don't think they have a chance to prove something this season? I mean I suppose I don't know how much drastic improvements they made in the off season I think there's still a number of years away I think justin fields will be great But I think it'll just be I mean that offensive line still an issue I'm not sure if they're wide receiving core is really what do we have there? Do we have running back so justin fields doesn't have to run very often. There's the defense There's jail and waddle nice 2021 Prism autograph jail and waddle ps a nine but if he if he wants to win I mean then Damian with the dolphins if he wants to win he should be going to the dolphins That'd be a good team to go on I don't know how that would work though You'd have to sign the franchise tender and then Because I mean a giant saw the rights to him unless they trade him Frank it's saying that uh his fancy team the go long dongs They need to improve this year. Yeah Frank You as the owner of the of the long dongs What uh You know the onus is on you as the owner and general manager. You're on the hot seat What are the go longs going to do this year? Frank you can you tell us what you're going to do to improve this team for all fans of the go long dongs Who have been lifelong fans following the team ride or die? He's Derek Carr Raiders raiders also have a long way to go james. Oh are the raiders Tell us frank as owner in gm. What are you what are you doing? Depends on where you landed the draft have you been uh You know have you been improving the facilities? Have you increased the scouting the budget for the scouting department? You know we that's things we want to know. What about that practice facility? Don't don't you think we should bring that practice facility up to the uh Up to 2023 standards You mentioned the raiders waiting to see what the giants do if you want to imagine the raiders are the team to go No, no, no, no you Not surprisingly rex you have misunderstood me They have a similar situation in their running back. Josh Jacobs Who has also been offered the franchise tag? Like seiquan barkley So if seiquan barkley ends up signing a multi-year deal for x amount of dollars That may set the tone as to what a contract that they can offer They're running back the raiders running back. Josh Jacobs Raiders are probably hoping that it'll be a lower contract That seiquan accepts. So then negotiation wise the raiders can look at the giants and be like see josh Jacobs He accepted this much We got christian watson Two-color patch and autograph 46 out of 49. No the raiders don't need seiquan barkley They already have josh Jacobs Matthew Slade with the Packers Yeah, so I think that's what the raiders are hoping for rex like if if What's the word? Rain is a little foggy today Um, I guess set the market They're waiting for seiquan their giants. Hopefully you set them. I mean in fact the giants might be waiting for Might be waiting for the raiders to set the market So they can offer seiquan a certain amount Those are the two kind of main running backs that are That are sort of in limbo at the moment. So it's a game of chicken eric diggerson Four out of 20 for the blue horseshoes It's for Justin Colts Duncan the saints fan not on the side of the car acquisition Whoa Who would you have rather had? What other uh elite quarterback options were available? You could just ride with james winston. I don't know if Jacobs can leave I'm not sure how that how that particular situation works. I think he's He would have to be released by the raiders Because they would still retain the rights to him So it's not like if you if he just holds out and doesn't sign a contract I don't think he suddenly becomes a free agent. Did I say elite? That was my my my Derrick Carr raiders bias still seeping through He's a middle of the middle of the road quarterback, right? He's an upgrade That's that's the that's the thing 12 out of 49 alexander manason Do you think the uh That goes to mark and the vikings. Do you think the saints were a erin rogers away? I feel like green bay was never gonna trade rogers to an nfc team though Yes, I do remember that Teams are waiting on the market to get said and then christian kirk Was that the jaguars gave christian kirk ton? He had to find I'd find like he had a decent season Here is jail and waddle lightning strike autograph nice 19 out of 25 for Damian and the dolphins Deshaun Watson messed the browns messed up the quarterback market and probably somewhat directly led to all that the The drama between the ravens and lamar jackson There is desmond ridder 22 out of 150 rookie endorsements autograph Nice one adam dirty birds Yeah back and forth on that derrick car decision that the That the raiders me. I don't know who else. I mean is jimmy garoppolo a significant upgrade to derrick car Maybe if he's healthy, but Derrick car has been a horse you know while Jimmy garoppolo has been off to injured it's not like I don't quarterback Breaking news ladies and gentlemen quarterbacks hard to find And we got vested veterans jersey and autograph christian mccaffrey 17 out of 20 carolina edition for damien the good news though is that derrick car has some system familiarity with uh Dennis allen being the head coach they've worked together before All right, next up is is deandre hopkins rookie deandre hopkins Wow, nice 40 out of 499 Jersey and autograph rpa from certified football Texans scott scott e Scotty with the Texans has deandre hopkins signed anywhere. I don't think so, right? I feel like we would have heard something about that Scott was originally not happy about the Texans, but now I'm good. That's Exactly why that's why the tit parade stuff. You can't really count out You know if you get a quote-unquote bad team Still can't count it out thick It's a book. It's for the stealers It's george pickings from playbook 34 out of 99. Let's take a look Pittsburgh that's going to be alan matsui nice two-color patch Nice on-card autograph. Looks like he's Being quarterback right there Really? Maybe I maybe I don't know. I don't I I don't really uh look around We do a lot of it though. I'm sure there's other breakers that do a lot of this too All right, we've got some obsidian football coming up It is Kenneth Walker the third for the seahawks rookie auto for the hawks of the c Chad B to 199 and if you like uh If you like obsidian obsidian basketball in the store right now jaspyscasebreaks.com Like that ABC always be closing ladies and gentlemen obsidian basketball jaspyscasebreaks.com Yeah, we like the hit parade It's a it's usually a fun break You know, uh, we've we we know the guys that kind of spearhead this project. They seem to be good dudes It's cooper cup jersey not a graph 499. We've done some exclusives with them I think you know these repack products are nice because they're just really an easy way to add some nice stuff Very quickly to your collection Without going through a full group break Easy to break easy to ship the sorting and shipping team loves these easy for them Yeah, davin adams breaks hit parade because they make hit parade jan Yeah, maybe maybe when the football season and or basketball season rolls around we can do another Giant giant hit parade mixer Oh Speaking of the raiders, there's bow Jackson 13 out of 15 moments autograph bow knows bow knows james. Oh And the last one 20th and final box. Good luck everybody And keep your eye out for more hit parade on jaspyscasebreaks.com Ah jan knows. Oh, you were being captain obvious again Or maybe that was AI jan There is christian watson jersey and autograph for the packers 42 out of 299 Matthew with the packers And there you go ladies and gentlemen That was a nice break. Oh, there's a wax party Invite here as well nice, so Let's gather everybody's names one through 32. So in addition to the nice hits A chance at a wax party invite I try to put chance and wax together. I got chacks out of there Let's roll it. Let's randomize it name on top after three We'll get an invite. We're starting to run out of invites. So get in while you can one two And third and final time so a lot of sad faces here Only one really happy face and that's gonna be Very close Damian But it's gonna be Andrew With the spot that you won in the filler after three times your name's on top. You've got an invite to the wax party. Congrats I'm Joe for jazby's case breaks.com. Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us and I'll see you next time for the next one Bye