From around the globe, it's theCUBE with coverage of KubeCon and CloudNativeCon North America 2020 virtual, brought to you by Red Hat, the CloudNative Computing Foundation and Ecosystem Partners. Everyone, welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of KubeCon, CloudNativeCon North America 2020. Normally theCUBE is in person, but like the EU event, this is going to be a remote virtual event. This is theCUBE virtual, we are theCUBE virtual. This is a keynote and show review with our analysts and hosts, Lisa Martin, Yopeshkar and myself. Guys, welcome to the program. Lisa, great to see you. You, great to see you remotely. Thanks for coming on. Always great to be a part of theCUBE and theCUBE virtuals. Keeping us connected. So KubeCon, CloudNativeCon's November and I remember in 2016, the first KubeCon, that's when Hillary Clinton got defeated by Trump. And now this year, the elections passed this time and Biden's a winner. So, you know, election, more good vibes this year from the community because everyone was kind of sad last time. So if you remember the first KubeCon, it was in Seattle during that time. So that was important to kind of reminisce on that. The other thing I want to bring up to you guys is the somber news of the passing of Dan Kahn, who was the executive director of CNCF. He passed a few weeks ago at his home. His illness and great legend. So we're going to call that out and say our thoughts and prayers go to the family's condolences to his wife and kids. So what I'm saying, Dan, Godspeed. Funny Dan's story, Lisa and Yopi said, I always pronounce his name wrong on the queue. He's like, John, it's Kahn, not Kahn. They're like, okay, all right, Dan, good to see you. Sorry, but a great guy, friend to everyone and super great human being. So rest in peace. Okay, KubeCon. I think the big thing this year, when I get your thoughts, Yopi, start with you. CNCF, what are they up to? Obviously remote. It's been a terrible year with the pandemic and all the disruptions and change. Your thoughts on where they are now this year.  But still the CNCF is doing what it's been doing for a little while now. So instead of focusing on the technology part of our RC world, they're focusing on, you know, the community side of it. So they're fighting for inclusivity. They're fighting for diversity, for resilience in terms of their community. And they are really working on making the open source community more accessible, both for end user companies as well as software developers to enter the space and have their contribution and you know, make sure that everyone can reap full benefits of these open source products. You know, we talked to Priyanka Sharma and Stephen Augustus and this was a big theme. There's been a lot of engagement online. Obviously, even though they have a remote platform, some people are thrilled with it. Some aren't, no one's ever happy these days. It's on the web, it's always difficult. But the community's been activated and a lot more diversity.  Also for diversity, STEM, women in tech. This has been a big theme. I'd love to get your thoughts on that because I think that's been a very positive thing. Lisa, you and I have been talking about this for years on theCUBE around this diversity piece. What's your thoughts as well? I'd like to get both your reactions on where this direction's going. Yeah, you know, I think there's a number of things that have been catalyzed this year by the challenges that we've been through and the diversity push into the spotlight. Again, the spotlight is different and it's really causing change for good. I think it's opening people's minds and perspectives as is I think this entire time. You know, it's for events like KubeCon and all the other events that we are normally getting a lot of airline miles for John and you. But we're not getting, we're sitting at home with our in-home studios but at the same time the engagement is increasing at every event. So I imagine that the great KubeCon and cloud native community that Dan Kohn has built is only getting bigger and stronger even though folks are physically separated. That's been just been my observation and something I felt from every show I've covered every interview I've done that diversity is being raised now to a visibility level that we haven't seen in terms of catalyzing action. Do you have your reaction to that? Yeah, no, I completely agree and I want to add to that where just like Lisa said, we used to fly to these events. We were privileged and lucky to be there to have that opportunity. But because everything is now digital and virtual, it opens the community up to so many other people who for whatever reason weren't able to join in-person but are able to join virtually and digitally. So I think even though there's a lot of downsides to this pandemic, this is one of the small nuggets of seeing the CNCF community opening up to a broader audience. Yeah, and that's a great point. We aren't getting the airline miles. We're getting certainly the Zoom and the Kube mileage remote, Lisa, because what's interesting you've saying is that we're getting more action with him coming in, doing some more hosting yourself. L.A. Amagasu as well, others. But we can get people more because remember the people aren't, oh, we are not trying so it aren't other people that were coming, the big names, but also the fresh voices, the new names, names we don't know yet. And I think that's what we're seeing with the remote interviews is that it's one click away from being on the Kube now. So Kube Virtual is 24-7-365 and we're going to continue to do that. I think this is going to change the makeup of the engagement and the conversation because you're going to have more participation that's going to be highly accelerated but also these new voices are going to bring a positive change. It might upset the hierarchy a little bit in the working groups at the top, but they're open. I mean, I talked with Stephen Augustus, he's totally cool with this. Chris Anicek is the same way, he's like, hey, bring on more people. This is the vibe of the Linux Foundation, it's always been. It's always been that way. And going back to the early open source events in Europe that I went to, I started doing that as a teenager 15 years ago. And the vibe hasn't necessarily changed. The makeup of the audience certainly has changed. From it being dominated by white males, it's totally opened up. And if we see that happening with the CNCF now as well, I think that's for the better. I think our community, the IT community and the open source community need that resilience, need all of those different perspectives from all of different kinds of people from different walks of life with different histories. And I think that only makes the community stronger and more viable in the long run. And I think that's what open source needs. Sorry, it's that thought and diversity that I think we're seeing even more now. And just my perspective is just the light that this challenging time is shining on exposing things that are really opportunities. And it's, I think it's imperative to look at it in that way, but that thought diversity just opens up so many more opportunities that folks that are maybe a little bit more tunnel visioned aren't thinking of. But for businesses and people to thrive and move forward and learn from this, we need to be able to take into consideration other concepts, other perspectives as we learn and grow. That's a good point. I was giving a shout out to Dan Khan and when I heard the news, I put a clip, one of my favorite clips of the interviews was really me kind of congratulating him on the success of CNCF. I think it was like two years ago or maybe last year, I forget. But I was a critic of it every initially and I was publicly on the record on theCUBE. Lisa, you remember with Stu who's now having a great new career at Red Hat. Stu and I were arguing and I was saying, Stu, I think this is going to fail because if CNCF doesn't balance the end user piece with the logos that were coming because remember you, but four years ago it was like a NASCAR logo farm.  You look at the sponsor list. It was like, it's the who's who in cloud and now cloud native. It was the industry. The entire industry was like stacked up against re-invent. This is before Amazon made their move. I mean, Azure made their move before Google Cloud kind of cut their footing. So it was essentially KubeCon against AWS. And I said, that's going to fail.  And I did it, rightfully so. But the balance between end user projects and vendor was very successful. And this still plays out today. Lisa, this is important now because you said pandemic, the ecosystem still needs to thrive, but there's no face-to-face anymore. What's the challenge? What's the opportunity there? I want to put you on the spot. Sure, no, I think it's both challenging and opportunistic. I tend to look at it more from an opportunistic view. I think that it forced a lot of us, even people like myself who worked from home a lot before when I wasn't traveling for my marketing company or the cube, you can really have very personal interactions with people on Zoom. And I've found that it's connecting people in a deeper way than you even would get in the office. That's something that I actually really appreciate and how it has been an opportunity to really kind of expand relationships or to open new doors that wouldn't be there if we were able to be sitting together physically in person. And it's obviously changing all the vendors that we work with. It's very different to engage an audience when you are only on camera. And it's something that as we know as we work with folks who haven't done it before, that's one of the things that I think a lot of the C-suite I talked to misses is that opportunity to be on a stage and be able to share your body language and your energy with your customers and your partners and your employees. But I actually do think that there is what we're doing through Zoom and all these virtual platforms like theCUBE virtual as well is we're opening up doors for in a more incident way that I think the conversations are more authentic. People have like three year old disc coworkers and they're running in the room and they're screaming behind that. That's how things are today. We're learning to work with that but we're also seeing people in a more human way. Cities, containers, mainstream and shifting left. The role of security this year, what's your take? So I mean, if we're talking about security and nothing else I think we're at a point where the CNCF has become mainstream. Its most popular products have become mainstream because if we're talking about security there's not a lot left. And I say that with a little bit of sarcasm I don't mean to offend anyone but if I did I do apologize. But security even though it is super important again, it means that we have moved on from talking about Kubernetes and container management or we've moved on from storage. It means that the technology part of the CNCF like the hard work has been done for 80% but we're now into the 20% where we're kind of dotting the eyes and making sure that we cover all of the bases. And so one of the new sandbox projects that has been accepted I think today even is cert manager to manage certificates at scale in an automated fashion. And I think that's one prime example of how security is becoming the theme and kind of the conversation at KubeCon this year where we're again seeing that maturity come into play with even with sandbox projects and now being able to help customers and help end users with certificates which is in the macro picture, a very specific, a very niche thing to be able to solve with open source software but for every company this is one of those vital kind of boilerplate security measures so that the customer and all of their infrastructure remain safe. I think Kube, what you're kind of really articulating and there is the evolution of CNCF I much to John's surprise is you said you thought in the very beginning that this wasn't going to take off. It has clearly Dan Kun's left a great legacy there but we're seeing the evolution of that. I do, though John, want to ask you because you did a lot of the interviews here. We've been talking for what nine months now on the Kube virtual about the acceleration of transformation of every business to go from that, okay, how do we do this work in this weird environment? Keep the lights on. How do we actually be successful and actually become a thriving business as things go forward? What are some of the things that you heard from the guests regarding COVID as an accelerator? Well, I think a couple of things, good question. I think it ranges, right? So they had some news that they're trying to announce obviously new survey, certifications K8 security certification, new tech radar support diversity stats, the normal stuff they do at the event they got to get the word out. So that was one theme I heard but on the overall macro trend, we saw the COVID impact and no one's afraid of it there. I mean, I think, you know, part of the legacy of these tech communities is they've been online. They're used to being online. So it's not a new thing. So I don't think that the work environment has been that much of a disruption to the people in the core community. Linux Foundation, for instance, had a great chat with Chris Anasick around this. He's the CTO. He's been the COO, variety of senior roles. In fact, they're creating a template around CNCF and then they're announced the FinOps Foundation, JR Stormit is the executive director. That's part of Linux Foundation. It's a practitioner community. So I think teasing out the conversation is you're going to see a template model of the CNCF where you're going to see how groups work together. And I think what COVID has definitely shown in some of the things that you guys were saying around how people are going to be more engaged, more diversity, more access. I think you're going to start to see new social constructs emerge around distinct user groups. And I think this FinOps Foundation is a tell sign around how groups of people are going to start together, whether they're Cube hosts coming together and Cube fans and Cube alumni.  That's now a captain of the industry.  I mean, it's becoming a really tight knit community. Everyone knows each other. And I think now they realize that they have a lot of power to infect change. And so when you're trying to affect change, that's a good thing and people are pumped about. So I think the big focus was CNCF is successful. Again, there's a somber note around Dan Kahn's passing, but I think he had already moved on to a new position, so he was already passed the baton to management, but he did leave a mark. But I think there's Priyanka Sharma, she's doing a great job, people are upbeat. And I think the theme is Kubernetes, it happened. It went next level, then it's going next level again. And I think that's kind of what people really aren't saying is kind of the public secret, which is, okay, this thing's going mainstream. Now you're going to start to see it in commercial deployments. You're going to start to see it scale into organizations. And that's not the cool kids or the emerging DevOps crowd. That's IT, right? So you know it's going to happen. It's like, hey, you know, I'm an IT guy or a developer. What is this? It has to work well. That's the big thing I think people weren't talking about. That's the most important story. I think another element too that John is the cultural shift. You know, we were talking when we talked about DevOps, who always think about speed. And I talked to some folks who said, you know, it has to be the IT cultures and the business cultures coming together in a meaningful way to collaborate in a very new way. Thankfully we have the technology to enable us to collaborate. But I think that's been another underlying theme that I've heard a lot through recent times is that facilitator of cultural change, which is always hard to do. And there's a bit of a catalyst here for organizations to not just ski the lights on, but to be successful going forward. And find new ways of delighting their customers. Well, we'll get the final word. I just want to say my big takeaway to the show is, and we'll go down the line, I'll start Lisa then you hope you can go, is the usage of cloud and multicloud is here. Everyone sees that. I think there's a financial aspect going on where the security you're going to be tied in. I think you're going to see new sets of services come in built on the foundation of the CNCF. But cloud and multicloud is here. Multicloud meaning edge as well. That is definitely on everyone's radar. That was a big theme throughout the interview. So we'll see more of that. Lisa, your takeaways. Yeah, I would agree with that. And I think one of the biggest things that I hear consistently is the opportunities that have been uncovered, the collaboration becoming tighter and folks having the opportunity to engage more with events like KubeCon and CNCF because of this virtual shift. I think there's only a lot of positive things that we're going to see to come. Yep. Yeah, my point of view is, I mean, open source is validated completely, right? It's a viable model to build around software. On the one hand, on the other hand, the CNCF's role in making that open source community broadly accessible and inclusive is I think the biggest win to look back at the last year. Well, I'm super excited for moving on to the next event. It's been great pleasure.  Thanks for participating and we'll see you next time. Thank you. Okay, it's the cubes coverage of KubeCon 2020, Cloud NativeCon virtual. It's the cube virtual. We are the cube virtual. Thanks for watching.


blink blink blink uh so um we have a newsletter that's pretty awesome and it is awesome yeah i didn't send links to it all the time yeah and each week we go over some of the cool things in it please subscribe and would appreciate it i would appreciate it everyone would appreciate we spend a lot of money really good stuff and it has just about everything that you can imagine that has anything to do with python and anything to do with electronics um from gift playing with circuit python to a lot of this neat uh auto generated code with like chat gpt and uh pong there's just a lot of new stuff that's in there this week however um the thing that we're going to talk about this week is this is the special guide that you wanted to um have made from the team which is all about circuit python safe mode yes so this was interesting to me because when we were doing a lot of um testing with beta box cricket i was breaking it constantly because it was like this was new this was like oh my god like we're doing python and robotics and all that and we had to do a bunch of stuff um that kind of like i would like oh let me take let me let me remove the following like frozen um libraries or like whatever it was i'm just like i need to like basically like an old school mac yeah how do i make it so it's like hold shift down while you up yeah how do i disable like how do i do safe mode and i and you know it's it's been a while but now it's kind of like possible so you can you can mess around and then you can boot into a safe mode if you're yes well we get into trouble we've always had the safe mode available and and sometimes you can you know double double or triple click reset to get into it um safe mode is basically if you had like a hard fault or um you had an unicot exception or um try things like a low battery like a brownout we have a couple different reasons why you might end up going into safe mode and um if you're a beginner it's really nice that safe mode kicks you out and like kind of stops running stuff so you can see what happened like you could see the the the exception trace however if you are not a beginner you might want to do something special on safe mode like for example um if there's a brownout maybe you want to like um stop check the battery you know save the data to a file um or if you're doing an iot thing maybe you want to send you know what's called the last will over mqtt and say hey i'm about to go offline for a very long time dead man switch it's a little dead man switch it's like it's like it's outside the scope of the of the code.py like you might want to do certain activities um and this is something i would have found really handy while doing like magtag i would always end up in safe mode and it was like you know shoot like i don't want to actually i wanted to just go to sleep and we start i didn't want to actually there was times when um when covid was peaking in york city and we wanted to look at the infection rate and then the the data source or something would happen and we'd wake up in the morning and the the display would it would hit an error like the database was down when you can do like a family but it's well basically like we didn't have this the structure built in but now we do so um dan helbert who's a core developer i'll go to guide which it what you can do is you have a a circuit if you have a file called safe mode up py that will run when in safe mode and what it can do is exit safe mode or it can again write errors to a file or somehow track what happened um so be good for telemetry um analysis etc it's a kind of a more advanced uh feature but um you know if you're not used to safe mode like along microcontrollers if you you know like try to read or write address zero in memory it'll hard fault it'll just like the watchdog timer will kick in it'll it'll reboot you i like to descriptive messages it's like you're in safe mode because yes this is also nice it's it's updated the description sure you're providing enough power press reset to exit safe mode that's really neat yes but you have to click reset it's that's the problem is if you weren't there to click reset it doesn't actually reset whereas if you're you know if you have a brown out you might want to do something with that information anyways it's um it's in the new guide on learn check it out okay um so in addition to the mag tech one that you were talking about could you have this safe mode interact with something like it fruit io could you have it like yes you could like if if you know if you have something you know you have something on a boat and and this error occurs um and it's a rare occurrence you might want to log when that happens you know i'm i'm i'm speculating because i'm actually written this but what you could do is have safe mode write something to the non volatile memory and say hey i failed at you know this time and then boot into the main program the main program sees like oh shit i just got out of a safe mode and it sends a message to a different io saying hey it's sunday at six a.m. yeah you had to that's my my data that's why the data that could be why the day this is getting really neat because you know a lot of people do uh stuff with uh those little micro satellites with circuit python i just like the idea of like this this like very smart thing that can operate on its own and yeah i think it'll give you error message later it does why which is you know if you're used to like i actually really like using this in arduino it's you can look at the reset flags and see like why did my micro controller reset and and you can you know even if you don't have a full debugger it can give you some idea of like what occurred um so it's again it's a little bit more advanced but it's something that i've been looking uh for and i think it's i think it's especially for iot stuff it's very handy because to be honest like the esp series could sometimes kind of just like go off into the woods yeah and you know it'll it'll hard fault and you're like i don't know why and it's very hard for us to debug but at least your project is i think this this particular feature saying and um how we do things like you can have circuit python not show up as a drive if you want to do something with keyboards these are like very interesting advanced features that really make it a well rounded choice yeah you know we just did this floppy project and um you know and did an amazing job and like jebler and then marked it like everyone worked together on this and like these gifts are cool and everything and you know it's it's not a project that i would um say you could do with anything else and i kind of wanted to be like hey it like not offer a bounty but like hey is there any other way to do this any easier way with lower cost hardware and not like you know just finding like you could find something else that works with a to fruit stuff if you want like that's fine but i'm saying like no like this would be completely written in something else like it isn't even possible it's like kind of no it's really hard to do all this stuff yeah this is very advanced anyways um so we make it easy yeah so good work okay um don't forget sign up get it daily any about box we do not spam you we do not harvest or emails we don't do anything like that


Hi, everyone. My name is Regina, and I'll be talking about this for a minute. Is this working? In November 2018, so just last year, Professor E.M.Q. announced that the birth of two baby girls to which he has added their genome. He said that these two baby girls were born normal and healthy and that he had changed their DNA so that they could become resistance to HIT. No data or any paper has been published for us to be able to check what has been done. So we have very little detail on what he did, how he did it, and who knew about this experiment. The few details that we have are the ones that he gave during the talk at this conference. So, at the point of his announcement, it grew up quite a shock within the world, both the epidemic community and also the society in general. And many people said that the experiment that he gave was very premature and a bit rushed, but today I thought it is better for all of us to be on the same page that I will show you what he did, how he did it, and what are some of the technical and ethical implications of his work. So, Professor E.M.Q. said that he wanted to make babies that are resistant to HIT. HIT is a virus that can infect immune cells. Once it infects immune cells, it makes them weaker and weaker and weaker until it can no longer fight infection. And if the HIT is not treated, it is fatal. But interestingly enough, there is one percent of the world population that is immune to HIV. It does not get infected with HIV. And these people, the scientists discovered that these people have a different CCR5 receptor. This receptor, the CCR5 here, exists outside of the immune cells. And the HIV virus, it's sneaky, can recognize this receptor and infect the cell. The people that are immune to HIV naturally, they have a modified CCR5 receptor that the HIV cannot recognize and cannot use it to infect the cells. And as such, people that have a different CCR5 receptor are immune to HIV. Professor E.M.Q. wanted to use the same idea, change the normal CCR5 receptor that most of us have and change it to a form that the HIV virus cannot recognize. How do you change the receptor outside of the cell? The easiest way is to change the DNA. DNA is pretty much like an instruction manual for the cell. If the cell wants to produce the CCR5 receptor, it will go into the DNA, check the DNA, find the instruction manual for the CCR5 receptor, in this case it would be the gene of the CCR5, read the instruction manual and then produce the receptor as the manual itself. So if you change the instruction manual, you will change the product. And that's exactly what it wants to do. You change the DNA to change the receptor. How do you change the DNA? You can use gene editing technologies such as the CRISPR-CaS system. This is a system that can read the DNA, find the gene that you want in our case you want the CCR5, find the gene once it finds it, it cuts it. Once the DNA is cut, it sees easier to edit or to change. And this is exactly what it did. You change the CCR5 gene and as such, the cell will only produce this changed form of the CCR5 receptor. So the cell is immediately HIV, because HIV cannot recognize the CCR5. But how do you go from one cell to an entire body? To do that, you can think about in vitro fertilization. HIV and Q recruited couples, Chinese couples, where the mother does not have HIV and the father is HIV positive. It is known in science that the risk of transmission from fathers that are HIV positive to babies is very low. But anyways, recruited couples where the father is HIV positive he collected an egg from the mother and the sperm from the father and then he proceeded doing vitro fertilization, injected the sperm into the egg. And at the same time that he injected the sperm, he also injected the CRISPR-Cas9 system to be able to edit the cell. And I brought a little bit to show you how utero fertilization works. This is the egg. And this needle here, there is this white blood there, that is the sperm, and you will see it being injected into the cell. So the needle goes, it pushes the egg, and then collects a little bit of what's inside the egg and then releases the sperm inside. And that's how vitro fertilization works. Once the sperm is used with the egg, then you get one single cell. This cell is called cypress. And it is at this stage of the cycle when you only have one cell, that you want the gene editing to work. You already uploaded the CRISPR-Cas system, so now it can alter the CCR5 receptor and you will get one cell that has a different CCR5 receptor that is HIV resistant. This one cell will then divide itself into two, and each of these cells will divide into two, and this process will continue until you have about 16 cells. Your next step is to find out if the CRISPR-Cas system did this job and if this cell really is changed to the new CCR5 receptor. To do this, you can do a medical procedure that is called pre-eplantation genetic diagnosis. This means that after three to five days after fertilization when you have many cells, you go into the embryo and you take one cell out and you can analyze the cell to find out if the DNA has changed. This is actually a procedure that is sent nowadays if the parents suffer from a genetic disease and they want to be sure that the child will not suffer from this disease as well, you can do this procedure. And here I'll show you how it's done. You remove the protective layer around the egg and then leave it like that, that will come there.  Once you find the right embryos that have been changed as it wasn't to be changed, then you let these embryos grow and develop until they form this structure that is called the plasticis. These groups of cells can be implanted into the mother. Nine months later, you have a baby in form. And because these embryos have a change on DNA, then these babies will only be able to produce the modified CPR5 receptor and as such, it is HIV resistant. And this is how the pezzanine cube made the first two babies to have a gene edited. These babies, Lulu and Anna, at the point of this announcement, this really shocked the world. But you had always two factions. You have some people, both in the science community and in the normal public, that would say that moves like this, experiments, radical experiments like this is what makes the gene editing feel moved forward, what makes us achieve better and go higher on our imagination. On the other hand, you have a group of scientists that say this experiment was done very prematurely, it was not well planned and moves like this, we fear the populations that will then lead to the condition of loss that can prevent the further development of this field. So let's take a look at what are the implications, technical and ethical of this experiment. I will not be able to go into every single implication but I will do three of each. Let's start with technical implications. Some of the technical implications are related with the use of the CRISPR-Casman system, with the gene editing technology itself. CRISPR-Casman system, although it's a fantastic system, is one of the questions that we had to edit genes, it's still very recent. It is used in the lab for about 10 years. So we are still learning the consequences of using it. And recently we have found out that even though this system is super efficient, it can also lead to some alterations on the DNA that you did not expect. So it will change the gene that you want, but it can also change some genes somewhere else that you were not expecting. These alterations can be, has non-important as a very important with the blue eye and the brown eye, and has serious as this baby being more likely to develop cancer or being born with a malformed liver. So these non-intended defects are hard to predict and sometimes they're even hard to find out, even by analyzing the DNA before the implantation was resolved. Another thing that we can think about is that the CCR-Pyroceptor exists in other bodies for a reason. Its job is not to be there to let the HIV virus in. It is there to actually protect us against the virus. So once you change the CCR-Pyroceptor to a form that you can along the word properly, then studies have found that you are more likely to suffer severe side effects and severe forms or symptoms of infections from western virus, tick-borne virus, yellow fever and Zika virus. And although these virus might all sound very tropical, it's actually not so true because a study in Spain has found that people have a change in this receptor are actually four times more likely than average to die from complications from the flu virus. Another thing that we need to think about is that because these babies have all of their cells in all of the body as a change, so even their sexual cells have no change. This means that whatever consequences good or bad come about because of the gene editing, will be passed along to the next generation and then to the next generation. So these are some of the technical implications about the work when using gene editing technologies in human areas. Let's now discuss some of the ethical implications. Professor Lee has recruited fathers that were HIV positives and we know that the risk of infection from a father to a baby is very low. And nowadays there are medicines called antivirals that are safe, cheap and a proven method of treating HIV infection. They can even protect these fathers from contaminating their baby or even the mother. So they are effective. So now the point that is about is it ethical to use an unproven treatment that we don't really know the consequences of? It's when there is a safe and cheap method to treat these children to protect their family HIV. Another ethical aspect that we need to think about is that when Professor Lee and you did this project and also the gene editing technologies came about it was agreed within the scientific community that we did not know enough about this technology to use it in human embryos for pregnancy. And it was agreed that we would not do this right now. When he did this he broke the trust of the scientific community. More importantly and maybe more concerning is that by doing it in such a secrecy he raises very serious ethical and civil rights concerns about the way that he did the experiment and if the patient or the parents in this case knew about the risks and the consequences of doing gene editing in their babies. Another thing that we need to consider and it's actually something that is being discussed a lot right now in our media is that what is the limit between making a baby better looking or that has better skills in music to treating a disease? What is the difference between enhancement and treatment? If you ask to most of the world population they will tell you that gene editing is fine as long as you are treating for a disease. But then it comes about what you define as a disease because if I ask you do you consider blindness or deathness a disease your answer might be yes but maybe if I ask a death person if he feels like he's safe he might certainly not. So where do you define the disease? These are not so easy questions and we don't have them right now but the truth is, CRISPR babies exist this is not something that you can ignore and pretend that it will never happen again this is not true there are already people claiming that they want to have the next participation so we need to face the fact that this is happening and it will happen so right now there is a large discussion all around the world which I believe that all of us need to participate on because right now there are discussions all over the world about what rules, legislations, laws need to be applied to protect the future patients so that no more ethical problems arise from this and that people know the risks and the need for this alteration on their genome but we also need to be careful that when applying these laws to protect the people that we are also not preventing the development of this research because for HIV we know the gene that can have an impact but for many other diseases we don't really know what causes them and how we can prevent them using this technology so this will need to be for the development and it's not by creating very restrictive laws that we will be able to do this and as Carl Singer said the world is so great today about the pros and cons of CRISPR instead of a paranoid ban on the technology and it is with this sentence that I want to leave you to have a proper conversation about the CRISPR thingies and gene editing technologies and I put together a file full of some documents and some links for interviews that I think will be good for you to learn more about this technology is it good some testimonies from mothers that have genetic diseases and how they feel about having their babies both with gene editing technologies for example so take a look if you are interested in learning more and that's it, thank you very much Hi it's Gina Microphone there is a long microphone here and I want to go in there there is this one there is it in me bringing the microphone thank you very much so what do you think an appropriate level of oversight and control of the thing in general would look like how do you keep the gene involved? okay so you are asking me the question to solve the world problem yes, lovely that we are protecting the people and that we have the best interest of the people in mind but they also need to be set up in a great area because what, for example, not the rest but for some others I am doing gene editing technology but for some others we don't and these risks that I tell you they are not 100% you might do it one time and it goes perfectly and then the second time you do it it goes horribly so you cannot prevent everything from happening but you should try your best to make sure that everyone does it as safely as you can but this is a very very hard question and it's not so easy to answer okay, more questions? more tricky, there is another question in the centre please don't tell me to pick four, please thanks very much anyway, it's all right, we've got let's assume that this the development of the 45% of the 5% is going to be set around the future at some point 10 or more percent of the population will have 45% of the 5% won't the high growth bias adapt to this new 45% and then everyone is actually affected? would you make a repeat because I mean it was not very well yes, so if we start doing this then everyone will have the different CCR5% will the 5% adapt to then use something else instead of this receptor the answer is most likely because the virus has an incredible capacity to adapt to different things and the CCR5% is actually the most common way that the age-riding B virus gets in but there are some other forms of the virus that can get in through other ways so it's not so good and I think or right if the virus feels like it's dying then it probably will change something to find somewhere else to go in I think it's very interesting I think it's a very good point to add that this should be considered in discussion as well what are the risks of applying this for a specific case are there more questions ready right now? or yes? so is there a way to do gene editing on the person who is already born or so far there are technologies only do gene editing on every older cell? it's exactly the year they're leaving from so right now gene editing is used as a medical treatment for some cases of some diseases such for example people that the bubble babies the babies that are born without an immune system then you can do some gene therapy and techniques to help these people develop an immune system and right now there are a bunch of studies coming out of people doing gene editing to solve genetic problems but it has always been done in adults because then you change your cells and you do not pass them on to the next generation so the entire thing of doing gene editing in embryos and why this is so shocking is because you are affecting the next generations but gene editing is actually a very good technique and it's used today for medical purposes thank you now I'm afraid of the back people really feel that it's a smell and they get nervous so I invite you all now to the break please ask more questions to the liana and to our other speakers here in the break enjoy it fast, don't make a mess and thank you liana again


Things are looking up for Jeff Judd. That's Brian Stokes parked up after the start of Special Stage 8 with electrical problems. So Judd is first on the road with Stokes powerless to stop him. But the temptation to lead the rally is too great and Judd has a moment midway through the stage. Let off for the warning, the Black BDG escort powers on toward the finish at an astonishingly quick pace for just the second day of the 8-day marathon. Yeah, a bit silly, but just a crown of the road dropped off and it turned out we've got seize frontstructs. That maybe didn't help with turning, so mixture of that and over at Zerbritz. Seized shocks or not, if it had to happen it couldn't have happened in a better place. The guy emerging from the dust handing out the instructions is Gary Cliff. Judd's crew chief who came here to spend time between services. Cliff immediately slips into work mode and takes control of the situation. Conscious the pair must not accept outside help. I just noticed that the wheel was actually completely smashed. So I'm trying to get Jeff to back back as we can see so we can get it changed rather than do some damage through the other road driving it out. As most drivers never go driving it out, so yeah, I'm quite pleased that we're there really.


Through the Hopkins Library system, you have access to a wide range of books, journals, and other resources. Even with this robust collection available at your fingertips, there may occasionally be an item that you need that you can't access. In this case, you can request it through WellDoc, the Library's Interlibrary Loan Service. WellDoc is a free service that you can use to request and receive print and electronic items, such as books, journal articles, conference papers, book chapters, reports, and theses. WellDoc requests are processed daily, Monday through Friday. However, if you request a journal article that Hopkins only owns in print format, please allow two to three days for your request to be processed, although some requests come sooner. For items borrowed from non-Hopkins libraries, the average time is a week to ten days. Five requests per person per day will be processed. Up to twenty per day may be submitted. To get started using WellDoc, you'll need to set up an account. From the Welch Library website, locate the Interlibrary Loan heading on the bottom right of the page and click on the Request an Item link. Log in with your JED ID and password. This will send you to WellDoc's main menu, indicating that your account is ready to use. When you're searching in a database, you might run across an item that is not available through Hopkins. This is when WellDoc comes in handy. For example, let's say you're in PubMed and you found this historical article on the rash caused by Lyme disease. When you try the Find It at JH button, you run into a screen that says Online Access Not Available. When this happens, you'll need to request a copy from Interlibrary Loan. Click on the Interlibrary Loan link and log in with your JED ID. Conveniently, when you access WellDoc through a database, the request form is automatically populated with key citation information. Double-check to make sure that the information is correct as any misinformation may delay processing your request. Next, if there's a date when you'll no longer need the item, indicate this on the form. Also, indicate if you'll accept the item in a language other than English. Finally, provide any additional information you have that can help in locating the item. When complete, click on the Submit Request button. This will send you to the WellDoc home page where you'll see that your item has been requested. You can check the status of your request at any time by logging back in to your account. Once the item is ready, you'll receive an email. For items available electronically, log into WellDoc. Click on electronically received requests. Here you'll see the PDF for the item. It's important to note that the PDF is only accessible from your account for the next 30 days. To have permanent access, make sure you save the document somewhere on your computer that you can easily access again. If you ordered a print book, you can pick it up at the location you designated when you requested it. The last thing to mention is that there may be a time when you have the full citation information for an item, but you're not in a database. For example, you might have found a citation in an article's reference list. When this is the case, you can go directly to WellDoc from the library's home page and fill out the request form. On the WellDoc home page, find the new request section on the left-hand side. Here you can select the format of the item you're requesting. For example, I might need a specific chapter from a book such as this chapter found in William Osler, the European Connection. In this case, I'll click on the book chapter link. On the form include all starred information. Just as with the PubMed example, include a not-wanted after-date and indicate if you'll accept the item in a language other than English. Submit your request and in about 10 days, you should receive notification that it's ready. In summary, when you need an item that isn't available through the Hopkins libraries, you can request it through WellDoc. If you find the item through a database, use the Find It at JH button and then complete the corresponding Interlibrary Loan Request form. Alternatively, you can request the item directly through WellDoc by using the request and item link on the library's home page. If you need help making an Interlibrary Loan Request, you can contact the WellDoc department directly or you can visit the Get Help section on our website. Reach out to the Welch Service Center through the chat, email or phone or contact your informationist directly.


Hello and welcome to this session. In this session we will discuss a question which says that Suppose you receive $500,000 in a lottery, this amount is being paid over 20 years time. You are given $35,000 per year from this amount. You deposit $500,000 in the bank account paying 4% annual compound interest every year and you withdraw $35,000 at the end of every year. Write a recursive formula that marries the situation. Now let us start with the solution of the given question in recursive. We find each term in the sequence by using the previous terms. When the first term or initial term or value is known, point of question we can see. The initial amount in bank is $5,000. That is, we have A0 is equal to $500,000. Now that gives 4% annual interest on it and you withdraw $35,000. Now let us find amount after one year. Let us denote it by A1. After one year the compound interest is 4%. So after one year amount after the interest will be $500,000 plus 4% of $500,000. Also you withdraw $35,000 per year from the amount. So after one year is equal to $500,000 plus 4% of $500,000 the whole minus $35,000. Now let the amount in the bank after one year be A1. So A1 is equal to now from these two terms taking $500,000 common it will be $500,000 into 1 plus 4 by 100 the whole minus $35,000. This implies A1 is equal to $100,000 into 1 plus 0.04 the whole minus $35,000 which implies A1 is equal to $500,000 into 1.04 the whole minus $35,000. Now this implies A1 is equal to now $500,000 into 1.04 is $520,000 minus this implies A1 is equal to and $85,000 in the bank after one year is equal to $85,000. Next year will be will be equal to $485,000 $85,000 minus $35,000 and $85,000 common from both these terms it will be $485,000 into 1 plus 4 by 100 the whole minus $35,000 which is equal to $485,000 into 1 plus 0.04. This implies 0.04 the whole minus $35,000 and this is equal to $485,000 into 1.04 the whole minus $35,000 and this is equal to and $400 minus $35,000 subtracting. This implies A2 is equal to $2,000 and $400 that is A2 is equal to $400. Now $69,400 amount next year will be A3 which is equal to $9,400 plus 4% of $469,400 the whole minus $35,000 which is equal to $469,400 into 1.04 the whole minus $35,000 which is equal to $469,400 into 1 plus 0,4 the whole minus $30,000. $55,488,176 minus $35,000 is equal to $53,176. So amount in the bank after three years that is $8,53,176 and the following amounts year after year first of all we have initial amount that is A0 is equal to $500,000 then we have amount after one year that is A1 is equal to $500,000 into $1.04 minus $35,000 that is equal to $85,000 is equal to now here we can see that initial amount A0 is equal to $500,000 into $1.04 minus A2 is equal to $85,000 into $1.04 minus $35,000 which is equal to now we can write it as A2 is equal to now here you can see is equal to $485,000 $1.04 minus the third year amount that is A3 which is equal to $469,400 into $1.04 minus $35,000 A3 is equal to now here you can see that $469,400 so here we can write it as A2 into $1.04 like this we see the pattern that next year's amount multiplied by the interest factor minus $35,000 you can see that the next year's amount that is A1 is equal to previous year's amount that is A0 that is $1.04 minus and see this in other cases also the amount will be is equal to A n minus 1 into $1.04 minus $35,000 that is the amount after which is A n is equal to previous year's amount that is A n minus 1 into that is $1.04 minus $35,000 the following recursive formula that is A0 is equal to $500,000 A n is equal to A n minus 1 into $1.04 minus is greater than equal to 1 so we have written the recursive formula that models the given situation and this is the solution of the given question that's all for this session hope you all have enjoyed this session


Hello and welcome to the Talking Yanks pre game show game two of the second half game two of the series we were at the stadium last night so we were not in front of our cameras doing a pre game show but we're back we're excited and I've got Jake live in New Jersey with me. Hello. Oh first time I'm seeing my hair today that's new and everyone doing a little Collins word slide. I tell you what man the, the jazz is last night. You like to land you more or less? It's helping. It's helping for sure. How's everyone doing? Uh, yeah man we were at the stadium last night you remember that? When the house was jumping and jumping, that's like a 90s song right?  Don't know the words to any song but the stadium is jumping first game after the All Star break. Yeah. Oh man. It's really. Yanks won her mom looked great. She's sending pitch zero runs three hits. That's Yankees shut out. Seven Ks no walks. The Rays and also you and I joked about this when we were talking about, uh, Fidolanzo and the Mets how like that's owing to be the pinnacle of their season. Like that's it. Vlad and his performance at the Omer and Derby is kind of the same thing. Like the dream season. What did Vlad do? He got thrown out trying to get to second. Yeah. Um, I'm trying to think. I mean, nobody had a big day for the J's or I'm going not to be weird. You're in my dream last night. Whoa, Nicholas Brown, uh, we're gonna need the details. Hey. Hey. Hey Simone. Um, but yeah, we, we had a good time. The Yankees had a good time, uh, big Edwin double. We needed that. Otherwise it was like a close game and it would have been such a weird loss. Does that make sense? Is that rude? Yeah, it was sucked. It was the guardie show. Right. Well, it always is. Yeah. All right. Let's do today's lineup. Today's lineup is, uh, better than yesterday's because of a significant piece. DJ LeMay, he was leading off playing third base, Aaron Judge in right field. We got Luke Voight, Louis, Linwood Voight, Louis V, baby back from the dead. He walked into the clubhouse late Aaron Bruin said, yeah, it was good to see him dragging all his bags and muscles back into the room like that.  I had my beers with lunch and then I had drinks at a game and then that's high in, all right. All right. And then, uh, Sanchez game, I do Gary's catching Edwin and Carnation, DH, DeeDee at short batting six, Hicks batting seventh, Glaber in the eight ball and Gardner in left field and nine all and a half on the mound. A dude who needs a good second half needs a good start and maybe it's a good time. I mean, the Jays clearly aren't hot. We showed them out yesterday, Domingo and Hap kind of different pictures, but yeah, Nita is, is today for Hap, um, kind of last year's Yankee mentality. Like if Hap goes five innings pitch one or run and he's at 70 pitches, do you yank him just cause it's like a good start? Let's get the second half going with a fresh bullpen. Maybe like Otto and Brandon do pitch yesterday. So if then Chapman is can pitch. So yeah, I think if you can get Hap to the win, you don't risk it. Perhaps like we're sitting at the end of the five and we're up five to one, which would be amazing. I would take that. Then I think you get Hap out of there and say, take the win on the day and let's build on it. And his last start was 5.1, one or run, um, threw a lot of pitches in those 5.192. So it made sense. And I think, I think his last hitter was a lucky, um, I might be forgetting that wrong. But, uh, yeah, I don't know, dude, Hap, I went through Hap's, all of his starts this year. He had the three bad starts to start the season and then he's got two blow-up starts. So I mean, we're talking five starts, but outside of that, he has been Jay Hap, which I don't know, it's, you can't just excuse those five, but, um, yeah, it was awesome at it. So I don't know. Weird year for Hap. Let's have a big second half. It's been a bad year for Hap, but he did have one good start in the season against the Blue Jays already. Seven innings pitched for hits, one earned run, only four Ks. Now that was in Toronto and we thought maybe like, oh, and it was, we were about on the verge of being, we could have got swept if you had a terrible outing when we went to Toronto earlier in this year and Hap shut the door down in game three, avoided the sweep, had a good start against his former club. Maybe that plays the same here. But who knows? They got home run swingers and see how it goes. But those home run swingers on the bump for Toronto is Clayton Richard, who is in a battle right now for shitty picture of the year with Aaron Sanchez. We did this on our talking baseball show, episode two. That's not really out yet. Um, actually it is Spotify. It's on there. You can go listen to it. Um, they both are so bad, man. Clayton Richard's last couple starts, six innings pitched, three earned runs, six innings pitched, three earned runs, six innings pitched, three earned runs, uh, LA, five, four, Houston, seven, or five, five, two, seven. He's got a 70 or eight in his last seven starts. He faced the Yankees earlier this year. He went, quality start, six innings pitched, um, 300 runs and before that a 4.2 with Is he is our, his last three starts the most deceiving three starts ever? Cause at those are, are those technically quality starts? Yeah, six innings pitched. Yeah, his last three quality starts, but he's been bad. Yeah. Um, yeah, his, his numbers over the past month or so are, are kind of disgusting. Um, and yeah, I mean, so many rioties for the Yankees. We talked about it on one of the podcasts. I think with KB sharp that our rioties actually hadn't been mauling lefties like they should, I think their numbers were down first lefties as a whole. Um, so I'm interested to see that, especially with King Louis B making his return. What, why didn't they activate in last night? They were just going to give him an off day anyways. And like, yeah, just one, just have Brayda on the bench for this game. Yeah, there had to be some reason. Guess it makes sense. Maybe like, I don't know. He was down in Tampa yesterday. It wasn't even with the team out there. Oh, wow. That's bizarre. Yeah. So I don't really understand what's going on there. But I hope that he's the best ever. Hope that he's the best ever. All right. Versus Richard DJ. The May you as a 308 batting average, a, uh, 379 on base percentage. And that's in 30 plate appearances, which is pretty significant. They were in the West and our West for a while. Uh, DJ also has a home run and Aaron judge has a home run and the labor tour says a home run. So keep that in the back here. Like that a lot. When did DJ's home run come? Let's see. DJ hit a home run. Oh, I can't see. Wow. Wow. Baseball reference. Beecher. Oh, it was last game. DJ hit a home run off Richard in, uh, John June 25th. So you're going to hit another one. Okay. That's exciting. That's exciting. Oh, this was, uh, so the last time we faced playing Richard DJ cracked one to left, like turned on it and then judge popped one the right field. First two batters at the game. I think the last time Clayton Richard faced our lineup, that's right. He got like the death lineup and we were worried about his health because he's been so bad against righties and they threw out Lemay, you judge, Gary, Stanton, Voight, Incarnacion, Hicks, Torres, or Schell. So now instead of Stanton, we have gardeners. So gardeners, the one lefty. So hammer gardener for a home run. Yeah. Wow. That was crazy. Wow. Home address spoilers. Do you want to know who's out there? For the Blue Jays? I don't necessarily care. But yeah, give it to me. Who's playing for? Eric, Eric, Eric Sogaard, Mrs. Soderbergh. That's an inside joke. So, well, kind of, it's like Matthew McConaughey on a talk show. So it's not, it's Matt Damon doing Matt Damon. I'm a kind of impression on talk show. Thank Kimmel, Mrs. Sogaard. He's in right field. Cool. That's fun. Freddie Gallus, your shortstop, a lot of hair. We saw that yesterday. It's Lone Joe's McFly's mind. It comes down like from here. Yeah. Joe said he kept turning and thinking like it was a girl on the field switch. OK, those that's the shortstop. Cory Hill will never be Royals in left field. Geria. Kevin Biggio, second baseman. Oh, my God. Kevin Biggio's Twitter handle. Doing it big. Geo. That's awful. Kevin, that's so bad, man. Do it, do it, do in it. I'm going to copy and paste it. I'm going to copy and paste it for the chat so they can see like how he has this. It's this is tough doing it. I know he's young. That's not he's not in middle school. That's really lame. Maybe he made it when he was in middle school and he's like, fuck, I'm stuck with this. I don't know. When you're young, you do dumb stuff because I think my first work computer login was LL Cool Jake. I mean, I was doing it facetiously, but. Yeah, someone said misleading title, dude. And I looked at it and it says Yankees versus Mets. That's tough. Well, we'll see if we can work on the title. If the Yanks and Mets do play today, that'd be pretty intense. The title is misleading. The title is misleading. Randall Gritchick in center kills the Yankees. That's a tough at bat, for half to be honest. Rowdy Tellas, Brandon Drury, old friend at third base. Maley, the catcher. And we know Clayton Richard is on the mound. I miss Miss Oberg. I think I've just fixed the title. We think we're changing the title. Because the Yanks first Mets was. Yeah. But some might say wrong. Do you have a what to watch for specific what to watch for? Voight. Voight, I think Voight's going to try and I mean, he is like an energetic, amped up dude to begin with, who likes. Being intense and like, I think he's going to want to bring the noise. He's really good at walks.  But I do think he's going to want to come out with some fireworks. Like, if there's men on base, if they're drumming, watch out for Voight swinging out of his shoes. Oh, Voight is a thousand percent. First at bat, no matter what, taking one swing. I know, I think he may take it when I'm saying he's been in third. If there's like the first two are out, I think he may take pride in like, OK, I have to work this picture. OK, and I and he might in like despite like the whole world wants to know he wants to swing, I think he might take pride in it. But if there's men on base for sure, I think Lou Voight is so meathead and intense that he knows like he's expected to swing out of shoes in his first at bat back and like he like the thought runs through his head, like calm down, just take a normal swing. And then he's like, nah, screw that. I'm Lou Voight. I think Lou Voight's first swing, I think is going to be massive. We'll see if it makes contact with anything. Jim, I'm going surgical. And I think when that term gets brought up in baseball a lot of times, it's about the pitcher. I think our hitting is going to be surgical today, because I think you mentioned last time they come out, LeMayhew, home run to start the game. Judge, home run right after that. And with how bad he had been, the Yankees were like, all right, we're going to put up a crooked number. Everyone's going to home run today. Richard settles down. He only gives up one run the rest of the start and the Yankees walk away kind of tail between their legs about Clayton Richard. I think today they come out and besides Lou Voight's first swing, I think they're going to put at bats together. And I think they're just going to destroy Clayton Richard. Yeah, the offense will be surgical. I know yesterday they had they went into that game versus Aaron Sanchez saying work the count take because Aaron Sanchez had walked 22 batters in his last seven games. And then Joe West kind of ruined that strategy on them. And they're like, maybe we should just swing. So it will be interesting to see because then Clayton Richard, he hasn't been as bad with the walks, right? I don't I think like some misleading title. Really? Did someone say that again? No, someone was just like trying to tell you guys. Oh, I think it's rusty. You were right. You were right. Yeah, Clayton's not walking a lot of people. So I think they're going to come out just looking to attack. I think they're going to take their singles when it's there. You see a couple of doubles. You'll see a walk there in. Everyone's not going to try to go for the go for ball today. And that's going to lead to more runs. All right. Wait, we are going to do Homer Draft. Then we'll go to the chat. We'll go Homer Draft over under chat. Are you sure you're not going to sneak at him? Homer Draft. It's the Homer Draft. It's the Homer Draft. That's pretty good.  Were you breathing while you were doing that? Was that like a... No, it was not inward singing, it was outward singing. Nice. Yeah. What do you think about that?  And so I'm kind of jealous of what he shows there. I have no interest in going to Eric 51. What's his aliens? And I don't, I'm, then I'm happy that everyone keeps them away from me. Well, they're friendly aliens. What if you're missing, what if they play great baseball? Would aliens have a better sport? They'd be good for a fun sport Friday. I think you're up first in Homer Draft. Homer Draft, it's the home. Just to be rude, I'll take Gary Sanchez. Every time I take Gary Sanchez... Are we counting this as a win for you? Did I win? Well, I don't know. We've done some, some half games before. I think you took credit.  Okay, fine. Jake won. Oh, trying to snake out a non-loss? I don't know. It just doesn't seem like you should get credit for that. I mean, if you want to get rid of your other men... We did all three games here. That's fine. No, above that, there's a two game set where you have one point. Where? Keep going. You got that? Scrolling up. Come on. It's pretty hard. Right there. Yeah, but we played both games. Right, and we played both games of that series when I won 2-0. We played 2 out of 4. I mean, if it was 1-0, I think you'd have an argument, but 2-0, I think you know how to homerun. All right.  You're just gonna punt the way. You're going Gary Sanchez. I'm going Voight and Judge. Who? One Luke, Voight, and Aaron Judge. So now who are you taking? I feel like Gardi's just in nut job mode and he wants to put one. I feel like that's a bad pick. I'm gonna go Glaver. Glaver got Clayton.  All right, over and under.  Where do you find it usually?  That's been half. What do you think it is? 10 and a half. 10 and a half, Clayton. It's Clayton and half. Clayton. I think it's 10 and a half or 11. Yeah, I think 11 might be enough. I'll go 10 and a half just because I think the world thinks Toronto's just gonna be very bad the rest of the way. Doing it big geo. Doing it big geo. And you just want to match mine. Whoa. 11 and a half. Whoa. Wow, wow, wow, wow. I'm taking the under. I'm going under too. I mean, one of these teams got shut out yesterday. Yeah. Do you know they're filed an official complaint to have people stop calling them Jays and just, you have to say blue guys. Where is the official complaint filed? I just made it up. All right, time to talk to the chat. What's the chat got going on? You guys got a home or draft? You got Valyrian Steel, second round V8 ticks? Dee Dee's 29th, February 18th, 19th and 19th was his birthday. How do you feel about the Angels? No, no, pretty cool. I think Jay cried about it. It's really cool. Went to bed emotional, woke up emotional, living emotional. Living emotional. Tom Davis within all caps, did you guys wake and make? No, Jake just has red eyes syndrome. I took a red eye flight yesterday and then I drank most of the day yesterday. So I'm, I tried to catch up something and there was crying. So there's a lot going on in this region. No, we got a fan from Zimbabwe here. DJ LeMay who broke Rob Angelo's beat the streak of 51 yesterday. Sorry, Rob Angelo. What does that mean? What those words mean to me? I'm guessing. Well, beat the streak. That's the old ESPN. Yeah, but DJ doesn't play that. Right, but maybe it was like, will DJ LeMay you get a hit? Who's Rob Angelo? Who's Rob Angelo? I don't know any of what that means. Flavors are eighth here. Our lineup is stacked. What's up with Johnny Lasagna? Lineup is stacked. I don't know what's up with Johnny Lasagna. Tom Nickens are meeting somewhere before the game Wednesday. We're, Yeah, we're gonna send that email out today or tomorrow, hopefully today. Yes. Well, gate eight opens at five and the free beer and food or all you can eat beer and food starts at five. So as soon as gates open, we wanna go straight to our spot. Jake and I will probably just be set up at gate eight at four o'clock. That's the goal. If you just wanna hang out, say hi. And wait. Gate. What's the bet tonight, boys? Or we're both taking the under. It's the action. What's the action? It's good always. How do you feel about Mike Schilt's ejection? He got ejected again? Like Schilt's pants. What are your thoughts on Mike Schilt? He looks like, like if a shrewt member managed, a shrewt fan were managed to baseball game. They're weird to me. I think Cardinals fans hate Schilt. Yeah. I don't have nice things to say about Mike Schilt. So I'm not gonna say them at all. That's how I was taught. Well, I said nice things. I said he looked like a shrewt member. Yeah, that was kind of nice. How's everyone else doing? Oh, I did a video on the, the Schilt ejection. Yeah. That one already. Like that Campbell football's new. Time to look at too much of the coffee. Bears, Beats, Baseball. All you got. Can we make it? Wow. Mike Schilt. The perfect Mike Schilt shirt. Yeah, I think I wanna make that like for real. No one's gonna buy it, but just no one likes it. It's the idea. Like, come on. Bears, Beats, Baseball with this picture. Or this one even? Yeah, that one's tough. Google images change their layout. Look at this. Look at this chat. Some people. Look at this. Here it is. Couple Gary day game after night game. That picture and then just Bears, Beats, Baseball. Should I try out for my D1 college team? I played travel ball to my senior year. Yeah. It should speedy. You won. I replied the last chat, you asked this with a super chat, which we appreciate. And I said, there's no harm in not trying out. Unless you don't wanna play. Yeah, don't try out for something like if you, if you make that's the problem. If you make the team and then they say, and then you're like, actually I didn't wanna do this. That's kind of a waste of time. Yeah, yeah. So only if you want, if you make the team and you would play, there's no harm in trying out. I know I decide not to try out, but it's really bad. What's in the lineup? What's in the lineup? Yes. Good catch by Armin. My favorite yank is extra slow, but really high in pressure. Kendra's mouse. Thoughts and advanced stats. Runs created plus war. They're good. I mean, they're just another way to measure things. Be good at baseball. And like use stats to supplement everything else. It can't fully lean on stats.  Use the combine stats.  I mean, I don't know. If a guy's hitting home runs and he's good at baseball and he's got a high war, is he providing you with a lot of value? Probably. Stats are cool. I like stats. What's your favorite stat? Favorite stat. Oh, God. This time with me. Oh, God. Why? I don't know. I'm so good at it. I'm so good at it. Why? You guys probably didn't know I could sing like that. Really good timing on my soundboard drop there. I was winning. Dominguez, Florial, Garcia, Untouchable. Yeah. We'll see. No. If any of them are in the major leagues. No. Davie Garcia is probably being- Could be touchable. I think he's I think he's trade bait as is could be touch. I think he got demo again. He got pro to the triple a To be showcase maybe Dave he's getting so much pressed to be showcased those cashmen's message to the organization the Yankees When they pump up a pitcher in the minor leagues, okay, think about savvy got a lot of hype Gumby got zero Zero Sheffield got a ton traded Chance Adam's got a ton tried very hard to trade in Oakland. They didn't want is everyone new chance Adams bad David Garcia getting a ton I Just saying Jimmy H. Short guys, huh? I'm excited for David Garcia, but I don't think he's untouchable. I think he's Are you recording on a potato? No, but Wisconsin living seems like your technology properly solid Let's go live in sorry for your sorry for your potato Wisconsin circle They bless first the east coast here. We are again mouse made out of cheese just sitting in there can't even watch a thing Do it again That's not do it one more time. We're gonna line the show


Integrated pest management, IPM, is a leading complement and alternative to synthetic pesticides and a form of sustainable intensification with particular importance for tropical smallholders. It has been shown to reduce pesticide use by up to 50 percent, while increasing crop yields by up to 41 percent. Despite this, policy support for IPM is relatively rare, counter-interventions from pesticide industry common, and the IPM challenge never done as pests, diseases and weeds evolve and move. This article was authored by Jules Pretty and Zerine Pervez-Berucha.