re to park. And I also found this out, like, the park mogul wasn't working for me that morning. But it was just me. I got someone else to, because I don't know what, totally blanked out. Anyway, you can only use it once per day. So I had to drop a kit off that afternoon after using ParkMobile on my vehicle. And I couldn't park again, even though it was hours later. You should have been able to park again. I couldn't. Not on ParkMobile. It said I'd expired my time. Yeah. Can you sum your transaction number or something to do? Did you keep it? So there is. So if it's within, so there is an ordinance if you're parking in a time-limited zone, if you're parking at a three-hour meter, you have to move. And you can't park at that same meter again for four hours. That's what the ordinance says. Right now in ParkMobile, we've got it set to one hour. It was more than one hour. Is it four hours now? Oh, we're at four hours. OK, so we got to fix the four hours. So it was later in the afternoon, but then I was like, this is a challenge we're working through with ParkMobile because so you could park again in that zone. You just have to do it with coin. Right now, ParkMobile says if this is a three-hour zone and you park for three hours, you can't park again for four hours because we don't know if you stayed in the spot you're in or moved to the next spot over. So this is an operational challenge we're actively working through. But you can always put the pump coins in. You can always put the card in. Because those are all smart ones down there. OK. All right, so that's good. That one piece was like, oh, gosh. But the thing about, so the business is there, like it's a hair salon, whatever, whatever. And some of the other business along that are not considered the designated downtown. Where do they park? And is there a way, can I just say, oh, can we just expand that designated downtown? Because they're close enough to the downtown garage to then park there and free up some of those spots in that. So the policy that we wrote and you approved is a piece of paper. So I guess what I'm saying is I would entertain a conversation around it. Obviously, there's always layers and layers. But I'm not opposed to having a conversation about options. Or at least outreach to some of those businesses that even if the car park exists, then it's so close. Because to hear staff saying they didn't know where to park.  Just don't jump over the wall. I can't say that. We hear stories like that just about every day from people whose offices are literally right across the street. And you can see it. So it's a real challenge and to your point, way of finding. But we did get the big green signs lit up. So there's a big giant open with an arrow. And downtown garage is big and lit. So yes. But I think if you're not coming, this person's not from Burlington. And I think they come in. So if you're coming in like Pine Street, Battery, anything beyond your place of work is like the abyss. So I don't know. I just thought engaging with business owners, if there is a need to alleviate some of those spots for people who have to go for a cut. Do you have a contact that we should follow up with? Let us know. One of the big issues just is who's in the dead. And I don't believe the businesses there are paying for this program. And so we would need to look at whether or not the business and the property owner would pay the additional assessment to get this free service. OK. OK. That's fair. No. That's what I'm saying. There's a few layers there. I do want to talk through it though because, yeah, I'm always trying to find a creative way to, I don't mean I'm not doing any more metaphors. Yeah, I'll just try to make more work for you, Jeff. Thanks. No, these are the things that smooth it out eventually. Let's work now, but they'll smooth later. Thank you. That's all. Thank you. Thank you for the presentation, including the ones in the consent agenda that we didn't speak to in detail here. Question. When I asked last year about real time occupancy, we're getting there. We're still counting manually. The switch to Park Mobile would help there. Is it, do we have real time counts now around Park Mobile? Is it still a function of getting the LPR? LPR is the solution. Park Mobile is not really the solution for real time counts. It's just too much data, too much overlapping parking. I've tried to do it a couple of times in the amount of analytical horsepower you need to make that happen. The calculations that need to go into seeing who's got overlapping parking at some instant is a lot harder than I did it in the spreadsheet. And the data set and it's not happy. So LPR is really the answer. LPR will solve it. And LPR, we can actually, we put it on a car. We can do occupancy counts around the city. So as you're driving down Summit Street, we can get occupancy on Summit Street. They just push a button. And they say, I'm on Summit now. They drive down, they found three people, they wrote three tickets, but they got to the end and they got 75 cars parked on Summit Street. So that will radically change how we operate. And answer your question because I'm desperate for that also. Including how we could potentially operate across divisions here.  I mean, in that tide with some of the stuff we're doing at intersections, it's getting real time traffic counting going. We do have real time traffic counting going on Riverside and Main Street up there. Yeah, your crosswalk. Oh, right. It's real exciting stuff. I recall in the past that your poor laptop was having trouble with some of this. I think it is, yeah. Are you still in need of improved analysis workflows or compute? No, that's what I'm saying, is that Island would need more power if to do it using part mobile. Using the part mobile data set is just not the right data set to calculate instantaneous occupancy. It could be done, but horsepower to do it, it's just brute force. Okay. This is a new laptop though. It's also that it's an imperfect data set because if someone pays for four hours, believes in two, you never know. That's true, yep. So OPR will give us real time accurate inventory. Well said. Okay, great. Nothing further on my end. Make it around the room here. Let's check Mr. Goulding. Can you see if there's anyone interested in speaking a public comment on this item? Chair Hogan, there is no one in queue at this time. Public has had their fill, okay. Not mistaken, there's no action you'll need on this item that I will close item six and move forward to item seven on agenda update to the whoops program. Yes, so this is very exciting. So this is us learning as we go. We came through about a year ago and initiated the whoops program, which is a city-wide, gives the opportunity for anybody city-wide for a non-safety related parking ticket. So that's basically a parking meter, parking in the garage, a resident parking. If you get a ticket once a year, you can say whoops, and we'll say, have a nice day, it's on us. Problem was that we baked into it a condition that said that you have to be ticket-free for a year. So as we operationalized this, we realized that it's, that created a conditionality that meant that people that don't often get tickets get out of tickets and people that often get tickets don't. There was an equity issue baked in there that was a little uncomfortable to us and operationally made it more complicated too because now you're checking two things. You're checking, did have they whoops before and has it been a year to codify that into the AIMS platform and get them to automate this process so you can whoops online was just became fraught with what if scenarios. So given those two, the operational issue and the equity issue, we took the condition of one year of no tickets out of the ordinance and just made it, you get for a period of a 365 day period, you get to use whoops once. You use whoops in June, you don't get to use another whoops until June of the following year and that we can manage. Just made it much more simple and then we clarified language to make sure there was absolutely clear that the citizen needs to request the whoops. It's not something that we, somebody gets a ticket and we decide because some of that was happening with people sending in blue chips because there's this overlap with blue chips is sort of the old whoops but the only people who got blue chips for the people that were in our P.P. So there was some confusion there. So we made it explicit in the language of the ordinance that this is something that the customer, the citizen has to choose and then we also updated gender references to make it non-gender specific in any way, house keys. So this was just us kind of, we're pushing a lot, you know, I'm here and actually this is next month so I got more stuff coming. We're here a lot and we're doing a lot of things and we're probably gonna be back a couple of times with some of these things, tuning them up, getting them right. That's what we're here for. Sounds great. Circle around the commission here. Commissioner Damiani. I guess my only question is just understanding the logistics of how somebody finds out about this. The first time I was hearing about it. So this is part of the problem is the messaging was too complicated. Like we kept, like I would write up like a flyer and then I'd be like, oh, we're gonna send this out and it's gonna be really confusing. And then I would explain it to somebody and they'd be like, but I don't understand. Like, what if I got a ticket? No, it was just very, like now it's just very simple once a year. So we're, so after we get this approval, we're actually, this is gonna be the trigger for us to go onto our website, go to our landing page, look at our appeal button, see where our appeal button goes, get the language on the appeal button straight, then go to Aims, say Aims, can you please bake this conditional checkbox into it? So like we've kind of been holding off on doing the big push for, let's see, I spoke this morning with Rob Goulding about saying, hey, we're coming here tonight. Once we get this approved, we gotta go on getting this word out because it's too good a program. We've been doing it for a year, it's a great program and it's been, we've been timid about it because it's a difficult message. Right, thank you. Yeah. Mr. Overby. I'm glad you asked the question that you did because I had somebody who asked me how to, how anybody would know. Right. Also, the concern about they didn't know that you had to do the appeal within 30 days. So people hearing about it like, oh, and this person tried various ways of communicating in this and nobody seemed to know anything about it. So I sort of reassured them that I sort of knew and I think you're explaining that pretty well. So, but the question I have is, is there a way to handle somebody who has a parking violation ticket from six months ago? Is there only one? And they didn't know about doing the appeal. If they messed up on this 30 day thing, what's the situation for a person like that? Is there anything while we're in this rollout, get people to know about it more? So right now, the process is you appeal to us. We can't do anything about it. We have to then push the appeal onto the city attorney's office and then the city attorney can make that judgment. One of the things that I need to, can't figure out the flow here, but I'm either gonna come to you or I'm gonna go to council. One way or the other, we are trying to reverse the rolls so that we actually have the appeal authority. And then if they wanna appeal from us, they go to court. Versus right now, they come to us. We say we can't do anything. It goes to city attorney. They say we're not doing anything. I don't need to be disparaging. They just say we're not doing anything. And then it comes back to us and then we schedule the court date. It's a very confused system. So we're trying to streamline that too so that we have more authority to actually say, you know what, you haven't gotten any permits. You're from out of town. There's no way you could possibly understand this. Maybe we'll grant that. We have to be careful. When we have that appeal authority, I don't wanna speak out of place because we don't have that authority now. But that's something we're cognizant and we're concerned about that very scenario. I think Mr. Irving's question is just whether a 60-day ticket can be watched. No. Not with us because whoops is something we can do. A 60-day ticket can't be whoopsed. It can go to the city attorney and the city attorney can void it. They still get their whoops. It's not a whoops at that point. So the procedure would be sort of custom. At this point, I think that there may be people that are like the fines for food.  How can I unload this problem? And so what can we do to help understand somebody? So it sounds like what they have to do is they have to appeal it even though it's too late. So legally, they're not allowed to appeal at all. I mean, you're stuck, right? Right, so your appeal is automatically denied. Right, so you've appealed six months later. You hear the whoops saying, oh, great, I'm gonna use that. You try to appeal it. Sorry, six months to one. Then it goes to the city attorney. Sorry, they denied. Then does it, so it is gonna cycle around and maybe the city attorney will go, oh, yeah, it's whoops thing. It's new, it's happening. I'm willing to consider applying it and not calling it whoops, but calling it wiping out the ticket. Does that sound like what I'm hearing you say? Yes, but a couple of things we understand all of those things, but a couple of things we are doing that we have to talk about is at 15 days. Well, actually, instantaneously, if you've ever gotten a ticket with us before and you've paid online, we have your email address. So if you get another ticket, instantaneously, you get an email that says, you just got a ticket. And then at 15 days, we're now sending out hard copy letters to people, to DMV addresses. So they're not always accurate, but we're sending out hard copy that says, hey, you got a ticket two weeks ago. You got to pay it in two weeks or you're gonna get an additional late fee. And then at 30 days, we send out another hard copy. So before, we're trying to get on it with the, yeah. It's just the cleaning up of these old ones that you're just trying to get out the door with the fines for food and this. Right. That was the, you know, and I think the one, you know, if you could answer my question, would you try the disability of how it works? It sounds like you're working on that. Yeah, we are. As it goes, we can feel like people won't go, oh no, I just found out about it. And it's 32 days later, kind of thing. Thank you. Thank you. Let's loop around to the phone, Commissioner Mutano. Yeah, thank you for that report and this work. I guess my question is relating to the percent or like total number of whoops eligible tickets that were actually applied as such. Is this something that everyone is using and are aware of or are there basically people who are paying this ticket who might not need to? And if you have any info on like as the year went on, if people kind of got wise to this and we're going around or if we got to do more on that front. It definitely gets used. I don't have any number on it. And part of it is we, it gets used when our staff coaches it to be used, quite frankly. If somebody calls it and they say they want to pay a ticket, our staff steps in and says, you can whoops this. You haven't gotten a ticket or whatever, you know. So, but yes, we do need to get some analytics on its utility. I mean that, because it's a reality is it's lost revenue for the general fund. This is general fund money and we got to understand exactly how much we're given away every year. But we don't have those numbers yet. All right, I look forward to that update at some future time for sure. Thank you, too. Thank you. Mr. Fox. Yeah, I just had one question about the program. I guess kind of related to what you're saying about like the revenue and the budget related to it. Like, what's the goal of this program? Then is it just to kind of be nice and give people that one off? And if that's the case, why not start with a warning for our first ticket? Like, I guess I'm just- So the goal is educational. Okay. And one of the things that I'm gonna come back to you, I'm hoping for next month. We still got a few little hurdles. Hoping for next month is a first cut at a alternative towing approach to towing because what this whoops program actually does is think about what happens in a resident parking. Right now, we're not towing in resident parking for resident parking tickets, but we have the authority and actually the requirement is shall but we're just not doing it. So we need a robust program to deal with this. So right now in resident parking, if you get a ticket and we tow you, it's a $75 ticket for you and it's a $75 tow and then you come in and you whoops it. We give you your 70, we void your $75 ticket and then who pays for the tow? We do because we just voided your ticket. So we actually, this program actually creates a financial incentive for us to create an alternative towing architecture to minimize the amount of towing because if it has the threat of being whoopsed, we are actually financially exposed. It's a really interesting, welcome to my world. This is what I'm talking about. All these unintended consequences of decisions we make. But we really think this is a really good program beyond the feel good for it. We really feel like being towed sort of a gateway offense. It's a stepping stone or a pretty slow quarter. I said I wasn't gonna do any more metaphors. I'm with a list of metaphors.  That's all for me, thanks. Thank you, Commissioner Barr. Thanks. I don't know if this is a suggestion that you might have considered already, but one of the things that I know that I did up at UVM was we were able to actually print things on the ticket in addition to the citation, obviously, the fines, the infraction or whatever. You can put something at the bottom that might say, whoops, with even a QR code, or even on the envelopes. I'm just saying that that way, anybody who says I didn't get a chance to know this, well, my God, you know, you got the ticket. Right, right, right. So I actually brought a ticket because we have wholesale redesigned how the ticket looks. And now look, I can't see it because my eyes don't work, but mostly I can. It actually is laid out like a restaurant check. It says what you, it says what the fine was, what violation you violated, what authority we had to tow your car, and what you did, what the fine should, what the fine is and what the tow authority is. So it tells you exactly where to go in ordinance to find the exact language that got you towed. And then it actually says, so this is like what you did, and then this is the cost of the towing. And right underneath there, there's a link, well it's printed, but it's a link to the website that articulates the fee structure for towing. So when you land out at Splains, and Splains says you owe me $275, you can go really, and you can look on the website and you can see how they calculated or were supposed to. So it's a double check for Splains and they'll have to work with them and they were happy to have that accountability right on the ticket. So we're being much more transparent about what you did wrong, why you're, what the ordinance was violated. But putting a reference to whoops on here is a really good idea. Yeah, even on the envelope too, because envelopes are a little tough because those are printed, we can change a lot of stuff. Well I know, but I mean a lot of it, you could just put like a QR code on that and then you change the website. You don't have to keep changing each time the envelope because once the QR code is there, it'll direct you to whatever link. Right, no, I understand that. We did actually redesign the whole envelope too. It's a much nicer envelope. Is it still orange? No, they're green, at least. That's another story. Okay. I never get ticked. So, yes. Place chair and leave a welcome. All right. So, all that information is fantastic. I love that those tickets are new and improved. However, when your car is towed and you're not sure did my car get stolen, I know Jeff been cheap and we've had this conversation. You don't know because you just think perhaps that your car was stolen. Why would it get towed?  You know what street I'm talking about and it's not the only one. And I know this, the whoops will not deal with the kind of over lake type street, which is not resident only parking, but it's parking on a residential street or will it? It will because it's a non-safety related. Okay. I believe. Plus it's a safety related. I guess we'd have, this is one of the things and this is what I've committed to use. I would go through each one and I've actually got a draft of identified which ones we think are non-safety related and we can actually create an alternative towing architecture. So that you would get that. You'd still get a fine. Right. Because you did something wrong, but maybe you don't get towed that first time or the second time or whatever we figure out that architecture. We are, as you can tell, there's a lot of things that are all sort of interrelated and we really wanted to get whoops fixed because it impacts the most people. Literally it impacts everybody from the new North end all the way to the South end because anybody parked anywhere or any non-safety related, you know, you're at a meter or whatever. There's more people we need to get that word out so we needed to get this fixed, but hot on its heels is understanding our tow, our approach to towing because of the shall language that's in the ordinance. And we buy policy from the administration have chosen to violate that ordinance and not tow in our PP because it's too impactful. We need to change. So we're working to change it. And my, so that was my little critique, but my positive thing is I do truly appreciate that you're really working on tweaking these things around the edges, diving deep into language, certainly on the ordinances. We went through everything and what's a policy, what's an ordinance, I learned a lot. So I really appreciate the effort to communicate this out to the public with the whoops and also figure out better ways to not be this kind of predatory parking infraction beast. So thank you for that. I appreciate that. Just on the ordinance thing, I would remiss to not mention Tim Williams, who is the senior parking services coordinator. He works with Jackie, they're like a team and he's all about the ordinances. He's in them all the time.  So I'm not gonna take all the credit. He's been very helpful. And in the period between Leonard and Jack, he really carried a lot of work. Great, thank you. Great, thank you. And thanks for the update on everything from the info provided to the color of the envelopes. Nothing else on my end, Mr. Goulding, can we check to see if there's any public commenters on this one? Not at this time, Chair Hogan. All right. There is some suggested language in here that you're seeking a vote, correct? Yeah. Yep. All right. You may notice that the structure of these memos has changed a little on the request of the city attorney to have a request up front, then explain the situation and then have a motion at the rear. We used to have the motion up front, all that out so nobody's confused. I like the flow. We found it. I can. Because I'd have to. I would welcome a motion if anyone is on client. I'd like to, okay. I'll make a motion for the staff petition. I'll second it. All right, so we have a motion from Commissioner Damiani in a second from Commissioner Barr. Thank you for that. Is there any discussion around that motion? All right, let's go to a vote then. Start on the phone. Commissioner Mutano. All right. Commissioner Fox. Hi. Mr. Barr. Hi. Mr. Chair, O'Neill-Vavonko. Hi. Mr. Overby. Hi. Mr. Damiani. Hi. I, for myself, the motion passes unanimously. That's everybody. Yeah, thanks so much. Thank you. Thanks, Jack. We'll see you soon. Thanks a lot. It's nice meeting you, Jack. Thank you. You were being right along here. Go to item eight, the records report. Pass. Norm, anything for us? I thought it was a recycler totes that you might have. All right, bring it to Commissioner Communications.  Just two things. I don't want to figure, Peggy won't talk about this, but I just wanted to thank Peggy and the two DPW standards that attended an event that Peggy and I organized. ECL and youth and seniors had an opportunity to attend a day job. Very helpful and very engaging. Took the information back. It's my work, they should die work for it. The other thing is just around, again, related to the discussion this evening around the new ski, just sort of a push in the future for more work around highway project testing out. I know that was recommended, I think it's part of the smaller park management committee and it didn't end up happening, but let's see if that happened. I think the question is, we're looking at the Great Streets Project for the Great Streets and other things. Thank you. Commissioner Overby. I just wanted to mention first the, you may have already heard about it, both to name the shelter and wrap it out, I want to be ready for the work around it out. I don't know what might be done to make that something that our commission could also endorse. I forget the language I guess from the NPA that made that recommendation, but it's based on the huge contribution that we're getting at about having to also be on record as supporting that, being able to do that. Second thing I wanted to mention, I mentioned about the recycling toter coming to be required on name first. I did make notes helping people to create a grant to help that deadline name first, but it hurts me that I wasn't very clear about how easy it is to go to your website and place an order, the cost, $10 for a small one. So I just wanted you to, maybe for the people that are watching to know that is an easy thing. Go to the website, fill in the form, you can pay by a check, you can pay by, I guess, other methods as well. But I had quite a few people that were just not, they were feeling surprised by that made first deadline. And I just think, I know it's certainly a lot of lost time, but I just wanted to make sure that that was mentioned in this meeting and as many times as possible. Whenever you see somebody on a recycling day to put the little small move in, knock on the door saying it's gonna be a useful thing to have, and also I wanted to mention that I was told I put mine out there so you could recycle them. You can't recycle bin, cab, unless you bust it up, stuff it into your bin, and that was obvious to me. Still sitting there, didn't get recycled, but you could use it for your own purpose, which I think maybe more people use tomorrow. It's a mini-rush. Just one of these mini-rushes are alerted to that so that it's not a major surprise. So thank you so much. You're hired, Solve, thanks for the publicity and Rob Goulding has been great at running the marketing for this. We will definitely use your ongoing outreach. Thank you. Yeah. It's always fun to visit people, thank you. Thank you. Mr. Montana. No comments from me. Thank you, everyone. All right, Mr. Fox. Okay, I have a really quick question. So I noticed that the small streets that are at the sort of west end of North Street, so Blodgett, Drew Street, Pitkin, and Front Street, I noticed that they all don't have stop signs and I'm just wondering if that is deliberate or if I should submit a bunch of C-quick fixes to get stop signs there. So effectively the answer is that unless there's some sort of sight line requirement or some sort of sight line problem or some sort of accident history, stop signs aren't necessarily warranted. You could install stop control. I think it's innocuous, but generally, you don't have to have stop signs at every stop, every corner. Interesting. I run there every day and people just whip out of those side streets on the North Street and it's terrifying. So, okay, I'm just curious, I guess. There's problems of particular intersection that can be a reason to adjust. There's some sort of accident history or reason to justify sight lines, usually our biggest one. Okay. Okay, that's all I had. All right. Mr. Barr. Actually, you have none. Great job by the city for continuing to salt and plow. Although we don't have any snow now, you plowed it all away. Mother Nature's doing it for us. Okay. Working good. Vice-Chair, Ina Luwako. Okay, not to bludgeon the recycling toters thing, but just I was gonna ask, how are you gonna reach landlords? And I see here that you're gonna include postcard mailers, BED, bill insert, social media ads from porch forum and more. I hope the and more is to reach out directly to the landlords because the tenants, if they get it, it's not necessarily gonna mean anything. I can look in. We, so the postcards will go directly to all property owners, which will include landlords, property, they're kind of home of residents. So whether it's in Burlington or not, it's gonna go directly to them. We're also utilizing our new OpenGov platform, which has most, if not all, at this point of registered landlords in the system. And we'll be working with our Department of Permitting Inspections colleagues to send a few emails out to them as they communicate regularly throughout the year and make a big push, DPI makes a big push early in the year, and that should be going out fairly soon to communicate a slew of things that are important for DPI, but specifically the recycling toter mandate that's been in effect for landlords for quite a few years now. So yeah, so just to underscore, I think since it's come up a few times, postcards will go to all 10,000 property owners regardless of where they live. It'll go inside of Burlington or outside of Burlington. The BED bill insert will go to 20,000 of their customers. We'll have a multi-hundred dollar social media ad on Facebook and Instagram, which we hope will reach a wide universe, but certainly I'm hoping the target renters via Instagram and hope that they are gonna contact their landlords just to apply that extra bit of pressure we think they'll need.  We will be reaching renters again with stickers on the bottom of their blue bins in the month of March. So when our crew turns those bins over, we'll be applying a pretty bright yellow sticker that has as much information as we can fit on there to communicate with some graphics and with some text that folks should be getting these bins. And if they're renters, they should be calling their landlords and applying that pressure. But I think your point is the important point, which is as a city we need to apply pressure. So we're reaching directly out to them in two different ways. The mandate's been on them for a while now to get these toters and we certainly know there's still some outstanding ones. So we're relying on reaching them twice and hopefully a little bit of pressure from renters and additional pressure from the city will keep compliance rates high from May 1st. Worked with the fourth graders. It was so informative. If those folks could have been here tonight, talk about North Winooski Avenue, that equity piece would have, they would have really been able to bring it home. So I wanna thank Director Spencer for allowing two staff to participate in that and really engage in the comments. We were with the seniors who were very vocal. And even as we wrapped up her grabbing any person possible to lend a couple more comments, which is really valuable. And now we have to figure out how and what we do, but that kind of engagement was fantastic. So thank you. Yeah, North's team was happy to participate and we'll continue. Good. I'm gonna be there, but I'm still in the parkway. This would have been better really. And then one final thing is Cliff and Prospect Street. There's this fantastic desire line as you are heading up Cliff Street to cross Prospect to get to the sidewalk right across from Redstone Green. It's used more frequently and it's, I think safer because of the sight lines rather than there's a mid block crossing at the gate of the Redstone, the north exit, yeah, of the Redstone campus because of parked vehicles there.  So I don't know. Can I get a petition? Mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Petition, sign it up. He clicks. Anyway. So I don't know, there's not a curb cut on the other side and there's not a crosswalk. Yeah. Seems, sounds bizarre. I'll say, I have a picture. You should share it with me after we get down here. I will. Thank you. I better understand it. Okay, and thanks, thanks all for your work by this, these freesaw slush season. Thank you for that. Second, that's unofficial crossing with no curb cut at the top of Cliff as I use that, including back in the day with the stroller pushing down it because it's an obvious place to cross, space in the clouds. Crosswalks that were placed in driveways, the Statenella thing and over the years we've tried to eliminate those and do what is really kind of by standard necessary for the ADA requirements. So yeah, they exist out there. We're just knocking them out as we go. Yeah, good. One clarification in the packet on the street seats program, which I was glad to support. There was a subtle note in there that I think gave this commission, alluded to more authority for this commission than actually exists on the topic of who sets the parking rates. As I understand it, that's not us. That's city council and the language in there was like only public worst commission as the authority set rates. I don't circle with Caleb and just sort of make sure that language is clear in the official stuff that's going. It's that the rate for meter rates because usually our charge to street seats is based on the meter rate which is something the commission does set. So the foregone meter rate, if for example they wanna encumber the metered spot for the day, then we charge them what the commission has set as the usual metered spot rate. If this is a dollar an hour or this is 150 or whatever. Because they are obstructing the space and the public doesn't have access to it. Gotcha. The alternative is that you go by the meter bank fee which is significant deterrent. So I think that the intent was to not make it so financially challenging for that purpose. Sure. Okay. Yeah. Thank you for that clarification. We'll make sure that the language in the packet was accurate and if not, we'll clarify it this month. Okay. Great. Recycling totals are great and the larger totals are great and all. Still seeing an issue with a lot of bins, thankfully not the city bins, but there was several Castella trash bins hanging out in the bike lane on North Union this morning for what it's worth. And one recycling totor that it tipped over and spilling recycling contents into the, the weight and balance was off a bit and it dumped straight side. So one was before we picked it up that had fallen over but you're saying others that we had picked up, we had left to the bike lane. No, no. More of the issue that one had tipped into the streets prior to being picked up, just spilling contents on a, it's not a level green way, it's tricky. But still the private carriers are, bins are ending up in the right of way. So the green one is a little bit off with the green bill, snow on it. Yeah. I know that when I bring them in, I have to really sit there and try to level it. Oh yeah. And not have it tip over. Yeah. I know it's something that's sort of, don't keep an eye on us, there's gonna be even more. Caleb or some big things on wheels. Yeah. Those complaints, feel free to report them at the front desk and Caleb or a member of our right of way team will address. Okay. We'll do. Yeah. I guess I appreciate staff's response to concern ahead about sort of a water issue, what I thought might be a leak and I learned a lot. Thank you, Mr. Goulding for the info and I appreciate staff taking a look. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It was a slushy mess. And there's maybe. The groundwater popping out of my bank. Yeah. Yeah. There was something else that was causing slush all over the road one day but I think that was resolved and was not a something in the city's. It's not the city of the structure, it's the water. Very good. Thanks for that. You know, I'll acknowledge here of course that there's a contentious item tonight that passing unanimously, I think it weighed heavily on me and probably all of the commissioners on that. And I think that so that it passes sort of a reflection of the trust we build in you all and staff's processes here and I'm thankful for that. Certainly we have work in front of us, front of all of us to continue the outreach communication and trust building with a variety of constituencies on an item like that. I thank you all personally and your staff for their diligence and effort on that amidst a number of time-consuming issues you all are purchasing. Nothing further on my ends. With that, we got everybody right? I will close out the commissioner communications and go to the next item on our agenda. Motion adjourned. Adjournment, next meeting date, March 15th. Thank you. Do I hear a motion from commissioner Barr? And a second from commissioner Mutano. Is there any discussion around that motion? All right, go to a vote then. Commissioner Mutano. Aye. Box. Aye. Mr. Barr. Aye. Mr. Chair, O'Neill-Vanco. Aye. Mr. Overby. Aye. Mr. Damiani. Aye. Aye for myself. We are adjourned. The young hour of 10-01. Thank you everyone. It's not our longest.


You did some Corbin. I'm Rick. You can follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Mochis, Jucy, Cum, Content, Lot of y'all are following us, y'know how I know? Because we have 550,000 and there's only 10,000 on Twitter. Mm-hmm.  I guess they just don't like juicy content that much. You know, you can reach us there a lot more. Yeah, like he responds to tweets and I respond to Instagram DMs. So just letting you know. I'll respond to your D. And today we're doing the cricket video. Yay, it is from a cricketer that we don't know yet. Capell Dev, but I do know that name. Yes, you do. Why do you know that name? Famous cricketer. But do you know why you know that?  The reason you know that's famous because this is who Ranveer is playing in his new cricket. That's the other reason you're right. So I got it. I wanted to learn a little bit about him before we yeah, he's very famous. I know he has a famous cricket pose like he is a very fine like he Something that's like this all around and it's a so it's like a very famous pose, but he was like a very famous cricket player. Hey, let's just talk about how much I wonder how much that's weighing on Ranveer. Probably a lot. But forget the fact that it's a biopic in that regard in and of itself like someone who's actually around. This is we're talking cricket now. Yeah, you're you are entering into sacred territory But he did it from what I've seen of this guy and like I saw a side by side Look like the prosthetics they put on Ranveer look really good But you gotta know this is this is like a you get this, right? You're gonna be loved you get this wrong I don't know if Ranveer could do anything that people if he did something that was not Appropriate with cricket. Well, he's Indian though. So yeah, I think he knows what's appropriate with cricket. I know what I'm saying. I don't think it's like one of us. Oh, yeah, I know I wouldn't touch that with a tenfold poke. Unless they wanted me to play a really dumb white guy, I would do it for a dollar above scale But yeah, I'm hoping we have some really good announcers in this. Yeah, that's one of my favorite parts. Scott Sterling! This is called the eight wicket hall, and I think he does pitching Bowling It's to be the Indian skipper couple Dev who will start off the attack here Have a very very solid Spooking in the air your dad going back at mid-on and he's under it So the first wicket has fallen couple there picking up Wayne Phillips with the bouncer and that was a well taken catch Bonnie's body might have been a bit of inside edge fit out All right, they was looking like a one through the freaking bat From the left hander It just has moved back a little bit into border and I got the feeling that there was a little bit of inside edge So brought her out just short of his 50 Yeah I'm not good enough yet, so I can see it without No The straight one and gone court at third slip that was a very good You'd think that if you didn't know baseball Baseball right away What happened? Oh, that's a good delivery hit him right in the middle of a corner about their version of getting rid of the copyright So great wish you down for some time That wasn't his belly button Bounced up and rang his bell and he's succeeding particularly with that bounce. That was a good one. Dang, I'll get your penis out of the way That's scary, I hope they're wearing cups Must be very indeed. It is right close. I think he blocked it. His finger has gone up Yeah, yeah, he blocked it. You can't do that. We know that he's fourth wicket in this match You can't block the wickets And also the fact that Greg Matthews being good for me ran beer right there certainly about us to the Indians Whoa He's gone. I think I thought it went up. I did too. I thought it went straight up in the air It was a very very odd string. I didn't even see that got me a piece of bowling because uh, it beat him in the air But I'm not quite sure what uh, Greg Ricci was doing We'd be disappointed with that method of dismissal There's a war I'm just there for the taking go cry white boy You look like a very energetic guy, so I'm guessing that's why they want to bring that energy. Yeah Three wickets and two ovars And that would have been plum Maybe Doug may have just lost that for a moment And he's out without scoring Oh And I wonder if the young man will remember that It's eight for 379 It's so terrifying That has got to be the most slender professional athletes I've ever seen in my life that guy Edged and straight to gavisca who has been standing very Terrifying you close it so fast and then he just bounces down everywhere around into the game. So Seven now for keppel dev keppel dev Edged and taken a second slip Cliving sarka so nerve use out for a duck in his first test match And keppel dev gets eight for 106 That was a great performance by keppel dev At least he can't appreciate the fact that he got eight We don't understand the game well enough to know To the magnificent bottom figure of eight for 106 So what a great performance all these teammates getting around there and uh with some Do they get a cheering off the ground? Yeah, uh But it I mean I can I know enough to know that they looked very impressive and terrifying how he threw the Yeah, well, it's like fact that I see something that it's going that fast But then it hits off the ground and you don't know where it's going now I mean they might I don't yeah, but it could come up it could hit you in the mouth It could hit you in the back of the leg It could hit you in the penis And we saw that it did we did I'm guessing they wear cups And technically for those of you who aren't familiar with the male anatomy It isn't the penis that hurts the most when it gets hit by such a flying object. It's the testicles Not me What? It's always the penis that hurts more He looks I would like to learn more if there's like a short documentary kind of thing about him that we could react to Oh my word This is if there's a short documentary about the penis But yeah, I could see that he's like a very like almost energetic it looked like Like when he when he's very passionate. Yeah, very passionate man clearly a really obviously very talented man One we know the prowl. He wouldn't make a film about somebody who wasn't that talented You wouldn't make a film about Bill Buckner, would you? Stupid Bill Buckner Yeah, poor guy Uh, I I would really like to know more about cricket before we see well before IPL starts up in the spring and before Uh renders movie comes out. I want to learn more. You know, I want to be able to appreciate this for what it is You know, it's like people who don't understand baseball Can't appreciate how difficult it is for someone to pitch a no-hitter And if you're watching a no-hitter and you don't know baseball, it's boring Because no hitting anything. No one's hitting. No one's running. No one's catching But everybody knows baseball is on the edge of their seat So I really would love to know I guarantee we don't know what we just saw. We don't realize. Oh, no It's just like with this level of skill. Well, it's just like when we saw the six sixes Correct, which we were like that's impressive. Yeah, you know, we don't know. We don't know how impressive that is correct Um, but I'd like to learn more about him So, uh, if there's like a little like a short documentary kind of thing So we've wrecked to certain people I would like to know that before we go into the yeah 100 so we can know about him a little more And we can learn because that film comes out Sometimes next year in the summer probably I think Sometimes yeah, sometimes 2020 sometimes 2020 Uh, but I'd like to learn more because I know it's going to be a hit. It has Ranveer and Dupika And then it's about a famous cricket player. Yeah, it's going to be huge We still need to watch the ms. Donnie until it's done. Yeah, we do We're behind on that. Yeah We should do another cricket video too We should we're overdue. You know who needs to go to the cricket a little dabble Second one'll do it too We we need to go out and do cricket with Ashley and Alexis. We brought Michael last time. We didn't bring the girls Can girls play cricket? Heck, yeah, they can play cricket.   Yeah, we've done that. Yeah, that'd be fun Yeah, that would be fun We've only played like we tried to hate it Obviously if you've seen our amazing cricket video that we did Yeah, I would I would love to like Know the rules well enough that we could actually play a game with some people That would be a lot of fun. That'd be fun. So let us know what else


Hi, folks. Thanks for joining. My name is Travis Rich, and I'm with the Knowledge Futures Group, which is a non-profit infrastructure organization, and we're dedicated to building technology for the production, curation, and preservation of knowledge in service of the public good. Today, I want to share with you our infrastructure action campaign to scale community-based distributed publishing models into the mainstream. I'll explain why we're kicking it off, to what ends, and share some of the ways that y'all can join and participate. To start, I'll set the context with a bit of our history. We got our start when we began building out an open-source publishing platform called PubPub, and we began it because we wanted a space to publish that was more iterative, more collaborative, more interactive than the traditional publishing models that were available to us were allowed. And pretty soon after we got into that adventure, the point that was coming across loud and clear wasn't that it was just us angsty grad students who were unhappy with the current set of tools and platforms available, but that many groups inside academia and outside of it, from publishers and researchers to policy makers and journalists, they too felt that they were being held back from doing their best work because of the available models within scholarly publishing. And there have been many different documented reasons for this feeling, from structural equality issues to the enormous extractive profits by commercial groups on a mostly publicly funded endeavor to problems of appropriately signaling quality to just being slow and obstructive. And despite these challenges being well articulated for years and well known, we still don't have mainstream alternatives and understanding why that is has been a big part of our focus. And now, one silver lining of the past year has been that researchers, reviewers, readers with a desire for change have responded to these problems during the urgency of the pandemic by moving towards a system that's more open, more flexible, more timely. And I think we have a real opportunity to leverage that momentum to drive lasting change towards this more equitable, accessible, scholarly publishing landscape. The loudest example of this for me is preprints. Once common in only a few disciplines, they're now flourishing in traditionally resistant fields like medicine. Researchers across fields and around the globe are demanding shorter and shorter review times and in many cases, making do with informal and rapid evaluations of preprints conducted independently of a traditional journal submission process. And at the same time, rapidly shared research is being picked up by journalists and news outlets in their mission to inform an increasingly concerned and curious public. And so we see these review services like Pre-Review or Pure Communion, Rapid Reviews COVID-19, experiencing dramatic uptake of their models and increasing interest from academics and libraries in the press and the public as resources that can help them make sense of the COVID-driven glut of preprints. And most importantly, it appears to work well. Research shows that these alternative models, these efforts to break out publication, review and curation as distributed efforts, that they draw more attention to papers than any other model. They're no less effective at weeding out bad science than traditional processes and potentially much more so. They're a much faster process than traditional publishing with more satisfying feedback loops and done well. They offer traditionally underrepresented groups more access to the scholarly publishing ecosystem. And lastly, they have the potential to offer a broader range of higher quality assessment metrics and to be far cheaper for institutions than traditional publishing processes. And I think it's important to acknowledge that these efforts stand in contrast to the movements of scholarly publishing conglomerates who seem to be learning from Silicon Valley that content isn't king, but the data associated with producing and consuming that content is. They're transforming into information analytics businesses. And my concern is that this transformation will lead to an industry where research will be open, but it won't be free as in speech. These groups can leverage their near monopolistic control of the publishing process to mine the data generated as a byproduct of knowledge production, apply proprietary predictive algorithms and sell that data and tooling for use back to universities, institutions and companies as analytics products to inform their hiring and investment decisions. And we've seen with other commercial conglomerates and news, retail and entertainment that these moves might be good for business, but they're potentially devastating for the health of that ecosystem. And among other downsides, the effect of this business model transformation will be to encode the ecosystem's existing biases into these analytic products themselves, making those biases less visible. And I think we can look to the behaviors of researchers and readers and reviewers to understand this disparity between what's good for business and what's actually needed. During the pandemic, when the going got tough, the tough went nowhere near the direction these monolithic publishers are heading. And unfortunately, without a compelling alternative, the incumbent power of these conglomerates will carry us further and further from the needs of a productive, equitable, accessible publishing ecosystem. I think therein lies our opportunity to build in a space where the commercial modelists don't yet have a foothold. This disparity affords us the ability to be innovative and nimble and work directly with practitioners to drive ground-up behavior change rather than falling into the trap of competing head-on with entrenched traditional models. And researchers, reviewers and organizations dedicated to making pandemic research more accessible and more timely, have found initial success, but face scaling challenges that have prevented the mainstream adoption, I think we all want to see. Their work has shown authors who are eager to engage in more diverse audience and publishers who are excited about new revenue opportunities for viewers who are eager to finally get credited for their expertise, but we just haven't seen that shift in behavior changes scale. And I think we also see this playing out further in communities that are doing enormously valuable curation and publishing work at the margins in Slack groups across GateRepos, but they simply struggle to scale those efforts into legitimate contributions towards a growing global Scali record because they don't have the pathway to do so. And this lack of existing accessible infrastructure to do so means that there are only a few who have been brave enough to actually tackle the challenge. And of those, nearly none of them have the resources to reach the goal despite potential new sustainability models. A second major problem faced by these groups as they leverage an alternative model is that most researchers and journalists and funders and readers just simply don't know that these models exist. And so while at first glance, the urge may be to simply run a marketing campaign, let more people know about these opportunities, the unspoken truth is that these groups can't afford to scale their innovations. They struggle to maintain operations, marketing, outreach, community support, technical stability, while even just supporting less than 1% of the publishing ecosystem. And so I think this unacknowledged reality has led to a vicious circle where despite the effectiveness, despite the promise researchers and institutions are seeing, they're also hesitant to fully embrace models outside of the mainstream. But the purveyors of these models also lack the resources to even support their current levels, much less recruit the numbers of participants required for wider legitimacy and adoption. So you can't blame them. If we provide the resources that allow these models to scale to larger participation, I think what we'll see is we'll see libraries and institutions and researchers be less hesitant about restructuring the resources and their time that's currently being wasted on outsized commercial profits and an ecosystem inefficiency in favor of sustaining these distributed community models and approaches to scholarly publication. But as with any complex ecosystem with many stakeholders, it's challenging to identify who should move first. Do authors change their behavior before funders expect it? Do funders change theirs before the authors request it? Do tenure committees hire in a certain direction before funders have acknowledged the value of that direction with their support? I think the only path forward here is really to bypass that conundrum altogether and simply say yes to all of the above. And so our approach at the Knowledge Futures Group has been to embed ourselves within these different stakeholder groups, a diverse group of funders and publishers and researchers to develop the necessary infrastructure hand in hand with these groups pushing on and needing these new models. And what we've found is that the role we can play is internalizing many of the different needs from these different stakeholders and synthesizing those into pieces of infrastructure that are general purpose, reusable and accessible. And I think this winds up being not only more cost efficient than building 15 bespoke tools for 15 mostly similar efforts, but it also gives us the means to move in unison with many different stakeholders groups at the same time. And we've begun calling this approach an infrastructure action campaign because it's not just about building a piece of tech or just doing the on the ground work, it's about this coordinated movement, a coordinated campaign with specific actions towards a shared goal of making equitable, accessible models of scholarly publishing mainstream. And from the KFC perspective, we found that closely pairing infrastructure development with the community led needs of researchers and publishers and funders who are doing that on the ground work is incredibly important because while not the whole solution, it's often the technical infrastructure that provides accessible on ramps to budding communities. It's the infrastructure that solidifies new norms and best practices and enables scaling of those new behaviors. And so success in this campaign means scaling distributed community based publishing models into the mainstream, shifting the overton window of what constitutes a contribution to the scholarly record and in doing so affecting a more accessible, more equitable, higher quality scholarship. And so we're very focused on the internet and I think the internet at its best has shown us that distributed forms of communication allow multiple participants from all over to contribute to a marketplace of ideas participating in the ways that they're best suited to. I think we see that same potential for publishers and reviewers and curators of scholarly knowledge. And for me, that vision stands in contrast to how commercial giants, whether in publishing or journalism or social media, leverage the internet in that it allows us to use it to enable distributed, equitable, accessible participation in communities rather than using the internet as a global marketing platform to homogenize and entrench preexisting problematic models. So in a world where that's successful, I think authors use faster, easier pathways to share their work and get feedback, reviewers receive credit for their work, funders, orchestrate and empower communities rather than simply doing gatekeeping and publishers and societies realize new revenue streams around doing that crucial work of curating the massive amount and massive volume of content that's out there. So the scholarly publishing landscape becomes one with more pathways for a more diverse set of contributions, types of contributions that we haven't yet imagined from groups we haven't yet recognized.  And the way we found success in growing that tent is by focusing on the specific benefits and risks felt by particular stakeholders in moving towards these new distributed models of scholarly work, what benefits for researchers, publishers, libraries, readers, journalists exist and which of those can we scale up and make sustainable and make more available and which of those risks can we focus on reducing? And by focusing in that way, we can grow this campaign by adding actions. We can invite new collaborators to work on the action of making public reviews less scary or making library budget considerations simpler. And so we'd love to hear from you what actions ought to be taken to scale certain benefits and make them more accessible or which certain actions should be taken to reduce certain risks and make adoption less harrowing. And of course, after hearing from you, we certainly hope that you'll also consider joining and growing this campaign to help do exactly that. Thanks so much, hope to hear from you soon.


Mae'r fideo sy'n fwybodaeth i ni o'r ffordd. Rwy'n ffordd yn gyffredig y ffordd yn gweithio'r ffordd, byddwch chi'n gweithio'r ffordd yn y ffordd. Bydd y ffordd yn yw'r rhan o'r link ar y dyfodol, yn ffwrdd y ffordd. Welch chi yw'r TV'r Tau o'r Matriaxion Ewent 2, link i City One. Rwy'n ddod ydynt i'r ffordd yn ei ddweud y game i fynd yw'r llun o'r ysgafelau yng ngyfryd. mae'n meddwl i'r gweithio'r sefydlod o'r parwg Gwledwsgrwynt. Mae'r cyfrif chi'n gwneud i'r bod yn ein bod yn cael ei gŵl i'r gwneud yng Nghymru. Rwy'n cael argynnu'r gwaith yn fawr, oherwydd mae'n meddwl i'r gweithio'r gwneud, ond mae'n meddwl i'r gwneud i'r gweithio'r sefydlod o'r gweithio'r Gwledwsgrwynt. Cysylltu i'r gwneud i gŵl i'r gweithio. Ond wedi mynd i ddod i gael gwybod, a dydw i gydag i gydag gweithio ar bobl o'r ffertyd a chi wnaeth gwertho i chi'n gwneud. Marko Silver maid yn y gweithio'r gilynebu, gallwn 5 rhan o'r thymian nifer o'r wneud, ac mae'n rydw i gyngor am ar-gwmp. Rwy'n ddiwrnod i chi'n gofio gyda le'r ffyrdd Lord P橫. a fyddwch chi gydag o'u wneud, mae'n gweithio â chi ag openingd wanth gwertho'i hyd wedi'i gwneud. i'w gael i'r cydwyneb yn ymddangos, ni wylionedd yn ffordd, a roeddwn ni'n bryd i'r cyffredinol hwnnw, a'r ydyn nhw'n ei wneud i'r gofyn, ac yn ôl i'r cydwyneb yn gwirio, a'i gwirio'r cydwneb yn ei cynnwys, ac yn ymdangos, a'i gwirio'r cyffredinol sy'n gweld ei wneud i'r cyffredinol. A oeddwn ni'n gyffredinol hefyd o'r cyffredinol. Mae'r cyffredinol yn ymdangos, roi'n gwybod yn rhan iawn. Ond rym ni'n ystyried yn gweithio yn y dweud yn gweithio, rwy'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio yn y gwaith, bobl yn ei wneud. Llein Cymru'n ymwneud bod yn gweithio'n gweithio arnynt o'i gweithio arno. Nid yn ymwneud o'i golygu yng Nghymru, ac mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gwahanol iawn i mi a'r Llyfrgell Yng Nghymni nhw, fewn i'w gwaith i gyd agaf y ffordd, ac mae'n gweddol. Mae'r gweithio, mae'n ddau'r gŵl, mae'r technolol yn ei ddau'r gweithio. Mae'r gweithio eich mwy o'r ddau a'r gweithio. Mae'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio, mae'r benad yn ymddangos i'r gwahau gwahodd i'r domyn y Caldwyll. Mae'r gweithio'r gweithio'r gwahodd yn ymddangos i'r benad, a daeth hyn yn hynny'n defnyddio'r llygledd. Dyna'r diwrnod o'r dysgu sy'n ei chondisiwn o'r cyllid yn cael uniggrifiadau, a'r chynllun ar gyfer yr unig fi fydd ei gael fyddai'n gwybod cyngorol oherwydd ac yn ei wneud hefyd yn y blwyddyn cael unigfeydd. A'r hyffordd cael unig fydd wedi eu hwrs cael unigfeyddion. Rwy'n credu iawn i'r Llywodraeth a'r ystyried o'r llygleddau, gan y blaenau i'r riddog maen nhw. ..ysud o'r cyblwyd o pob i gwybodaeth sydd angen fel hyn. Mydwch chi gylai, fel byddwch i ddim datblynedd dadle hynny o'r unig. Felly chi'n gwneud yn ddwylo chi ddweud llawer o'r ddiwrnod, fyddwn rhai fynd yn gwneud, ..eg pethau eveig o'r llai a llawer o'r tramedau a pob sydd yn ddechisio taethoniaeth. Dwi nhw'n ddweud i ddweud ei hun o'r meddwl y gallwn goll. Oes oes o'r femn am hyn o ddweud i Ddweud o'r gweithio. Tom Davis diddyn nhw'n have a goggei'n ffaith a pham yn y cald y Llewn. Hefyd, dwi'n godos chi'n cael ei ddeity. One little flick which was a good assist. Mae'n ardu o ran o'r gwaith o'r brosion o dda'r brosion, dwi'n ardu i ddim i. Mae'n sgwpio i'n hoffa y brif. Jeng Tocran cae i mewn halftyni ac dwi'n ddim i absolut ni i ddim. So, yna, ydych chi'n gweithio'r lluniau a'r hynod o'r ddweithio'r lluniau ..to really put a mark on them for the manager today. Lincoln got themselves back into the game. The big striker, I forgot his name now. Big lad off front. Cate to him, it. For me, it's the worst game in Everton Shate. He was everywhere, all over the place. Started getting in a wrestling match with the kid, and there was just no reason to. He's a centre forward out of league too. So his strength is his strength. So do not get yourself tied to him and Zoom. I got involved in all of that, and came off second best all of time. They got a free kick, which I don't think was a free kick. It was put into the area which was so basic. I was on down, but at the gladyslith end, in the upper bullhungs, and you could see where the ball was going to be played. Everton didn't deal with it. It came back, lad, coming, it's a shot or whatever. Job and Pickford makes a decent save, and they had to put the rebound in. Just that goal's happening far too often. We're just too reactive in the penalty area. We're just way for things to happen before we do anything. Now, low and be old, we're back in the game. They didn't create lots, but they made a good fist of it. And their management team should be very proud of the way their players stuck at it. Mark O'Silver made a couple of changes at the break, like he said, Andre Gomes coming done OK in the second half. Jeng Tolson come on and done absolutely nothing, which is frustrating because this was an opportunity for Tolson to get in and get amongst the goals and put them to the shot, and he didn't. The keeper made a couple of good saves second half. They didn't have anything until right at the very end, and Richard was not to head it off the line. The amount of times Everton got in right on the back, excuse me, in the second half, the final ball was awful, or their goalkeepers made a couple of really come off his line really sharply a couple of times, made some good saves. But we just didn't find the right ball, or we've hit a shot over, or Jeng Tolson's missed one, that Leighton Baines put on a plate for him about four yards out, just tapped it at the goalkeeper. And it was a frustrating afternoon because I think we all went there thinking we need to step this up. We've been poor for weeks, and we just didn't get going. We're short, we're short on ideas, we're short on a really good front man, and we're short on having a killer instinct. And I personally think Everton need an organiser, it's something we have won. I don't think we have anyone who's going to grab people and drag them into position and be in the face challenging each other on the pitch. I don't know where you get them from, but we need one, and we need one very, very quickly. I thought Bernard was my man of the match, I thought he was exceptional all day, he worked really hard, actually completed in 90 minutes. I thought Leighton Baines had a good game on his return to the side, and I thought Adam Ola Llockman, after those two was probably, probably Everton's next best player, other than now I don't think anyone stood out for me. But we've won the game, and like I said at the very start of the video, ultimately that is the main thing. Good luck to Lincoln for the rest of the season, you can see why they're doing really well in their division, really well organised, big lad off front, very competitive, and a good goalkeeper, and a good young management team, so good luck to them and to their fans for the rest of the season. For us, we're in the draw, and that's probably the best thing we can take from today. There you go, that's my matriax, and if you haven't subscribed, please do so, it takes a second if you want more videos. Join us over on Patreon, and also don't forget to click the bell for a late at the bottom of this video. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. See you soon on Toffy TV.


So, FoundationDB is one of the many companies here building a NoSQL database and we've been building it for a long time. We started actually over four years ago building the database but have been really sort of conservative and deliberate in coming to market. So we actually built the database for over two and a half years before even going into alpha or beta testing and then did that for another 18 months. And sort of the exciting thing for us with this show is that we announced the product, the commercial availability of this product at the show and are sort of here talking to people, telling them what we're doing and sort of bringing it to market. A lot of people that are thinking about NoSQL databases are coming from the world of traditional relational databases and one of the big things in that world is transactional integrity and a lot of people have questions about transactional integrity in NoSQL databases and a lot of the vendors around the show floor are using words like transactions and acid to talk about their databases. But one of the things that are really sort of highlighting with FoundationDB when people talk to us about it is that it's one of the only NoSQL databases to provide true multi-key global sort of transactional integrity which is a really, really important feature we think sort of for the next generation of NoSQL. Yeah, we had a startup come talk to us about FoundationDB and one of their challenges was that they actually wanted to run multiple data models in their back end. They wanted a graph database, they wanted a document database and they also wanted a key value store and so they were thinking about do we have to choose three different NoSQL databases to get all of that functionality and they came to us because our storage substrate allows us to actually serve each of those three data models off of a common sort of storage engine and the transactions are sort of the special technology that lets us be able to do that. So when that startup came asking us questions about that we were able to say yeah you can actually use a layer on top of FoundationDB to build graphs and we have a graph, blueprints, compliant graph database, you know. We also can be a key value store and also do other things so that's sort of an example of a typical kind of use case.


I am Major Philip DeVera, I am the Battalion XO for 1.9FA, so today we will be receiving four paladins and two cats. This is our effort for the Division's modernization, right? So as you can see in my background, that is the brand new Mike 109 Alpha 7 Paladin. And we will be receiving four of them and two cats for our FMNet training, which is our fielding new equipment training for the next August all the way through September. Hi, my name is Captain Sean Perez, first battalion, 9th Field Artillery Regiment, second Armour Brigade Combat Team, the 30th Street Division, and I am a dogface soldier. Standing behind me is the upgraded Mike 992 Alpha 3, also known as the Carrier Ammunition Track. It stands for Cat and the 992 Alpha 3 is the primary movie ammunition across the battlefield that works in conjunction with the newly acquired Mike 109 Alpha 7. The Mike 992 Alpha 3 shares common features with the Mike 109 Alpha 7 Paladin, as well as the Bradley-fighting vehicle with interoperability and interchangeable parts that help lower our maintenance costs across the Army and the Division. The Alpha 3 is able to carry 96 rounds inside the vehicle and is the primary mover of ammunition across the battlefield.