So, one of my book readers wrote to me and said, George, I'm not sure that I can sustain a presence on social media like you do. I'm afraid that it feels exhausting. I have to feel like keeping an image up of myself and or I might even find right out of things to say, right? Now, this is an issue I think a lot of you face. I recently spoke on a sort of like a summit where the topic was how do you run a business these days or at least even get started without using social media. So there's this ongoing love-hate relationship that a lot of us have with social media and it's not helpful when you are driving with the brakes on. So in other words, you feel obligated to use social media but then you feel like what my reader wrote to me about, I can't sustain a presence, it doesn't feel authentic, feels exhausting, I'm gonna run out of things to say. And I've been on social media now since 2000 and late 2000s, 2008, 2009 was when I got really active and have stayed consistently active since then. And I'll tell you, how did I keep it up all those years and particularly to do it in a way where I still feel energized and able to express myself in a real authentic way on social media after all these years. When what happened was most of the people, most of my friends and colleagues that I started with in the early days, 2008, 2009, most of them are definitely no longer active on social media and I'm one of the few of those early people who are still around and very active and happy to be around here. So the difference is this, I don't think of social media as an image upkeep chore. I think of social media as more like a friendship. So when you have a real friend, do you think to that, do you think to yourself, oh, I gotta go hang out with my friend now, I gotta make sure I have a good image I'm taping up and I make sure I'm gonna plan out the things I'm gonna say. If that were true, to me, that feels exhausting as a kind of a friendship to have to make sure I look the part and are saying the right things. A real friend, a friend that you can really trust like a heart true friend, a heart soulmate type person is one that you feel really comfortable with and because you feel comfortable and sometimes you don't look so good that day and they still accept you for who you are.  But because you feel so comfortable with them, there is an energy signature that you express authentically that they resonate with and that's why they continue being your friend. There's a soul connection rather than just an egoic human, oh, I like you on the outside and I like you because you say pleasant things to me. That is how I think of social media. Now you might say, really? Yes, I really do think of social media like this kind of a friendship where it's like I'm sometimes not going to be that fine. I really, I said before, I don't mind being unattractive and many of you are very kind. I say, oh, George, you're plenty attractive, whatever, I don't care. I don't mind not knowing what to say sometimes, especially on video. And I don't mind that my writings don't sound so eloquent sometimes and oftentimes maybe I'm a, at best an average writer and reading most, reading most of everything I read online, I feel like I'm below average of a writer, to be honest with you. I'm not being humble or whatever.  First of all, it's not my native language. I mean, I've been learning English for decades now. So it's, it's almost, it's pretty much native to me, right? But it's still, it's not my born language.  And so anyway, I have always felt like I don't write as beautifully as most English writers. That's, that's what I've got to say. And I think I have pretty good taste about good writing because I have an English degree from UC Berkeley. So one of the top, when I was going to school there, it was the top public university English department in the world and I got an English degree there. So I think I have good taste, but I just never became that good of a writer myself because I had, I didn't have the patience and just the, maybe the natural talent and I didn't work hard enough to become a great writer. And still to this day, I don't feel like I'm great. I'm an average at best, right?  I'm prolific. That's true. I write a lot more, I publish a lot more than most people, but my writing is just so-so. But my ideas, the ideas within the writing are pretty good sometimes, you know, and pretty interesting. So that's my writing. And then my video, as you know, unedited. Sometimes I have, you know, pauses. Sometimes I don't sound so smart. Sometimes I don't know what to say. And yet you're still here.  The ones that are patient enough because it's the ones who resonate with my energy signature enough to stay through my long, boring videos. And because I, it's because of you.  Those of you who are patient enough to stay with me, I'm kind of thinking of this combination person of this ideal connection, ideal friend. And because I think of you, I am so comfortable showing up on social media and I look forward to it because of you, you see. And the person who wrote me the original question that started this video of I don't think I can keep myself up an image on social media. I don't, then we run out of things to say is not thinking of the ideal connection on social media who resonates so much with their energy signature that they are patient enough and not just patient.  That's what a soulmate is, or at least a soulmate on this level of connection with someone's deeper parts that transcend or that are valuable beyond the surface level attractiveness that society expects on video or in writing or in showing up on social media. So in other words, I value the practice of presence and not the aim towards perfection or another way of saying it is I believe, not just believe, I've experienced that when I am comfortable because I am envisioning you, again the one half of 1% who are still here because I envision how connected and right for each other we are, therefore I'm so comfortable. And because I'm so comfortable, I think that is a perfect way to show up on social media this is what I call authentic marketing if you wanna call it marketing. This is what I call authentic business because I don't have to pretend. And I can practice continually leaning again into that level of comfort and therefore confidence in exploring and being my real self. On video and writing on my group calls when I'm being interviewed on a podcast. And so presence, not perfection because perfection or I should say perfection is authentic presence. That is the true perfection that isn't what society says is perfection, right? Because typically when we say keep up an image on social media, what is that? Where did that come from? That is certainly the external requirements or expectations, but expectations from whom? Who is the one giving you that expectation? It's certainly not the soulmate friend. It's probably your own past conditioning and training from your parents, your authority figures that you gotta dress up in this way, you gotta act in this way, you gotta get straight A's, you've got to whatever, which creates this societal sense of perfection within your mind that oh, this is how I'm supposed to show up on social media. I've gotta have makeup on if you're women or if you wear makeup, I have my makeup on, I've got my hair, it's gotta look right. I'm still too vain about my hair most of the time. I can't look frumpy, right? Gotta look stylish. Okay, if you enjoy looking stylish, fine. But I still wonder how much of looking stylish is an external expectation, an early expectation that you're trying to leave somebody who is no longer helpful for your deepest and truest authentic expression. So this is why I'm purposefully frumpy. I'm purposefully, I'm gonna make myself look frumpy and unattractive because then I strip away everything. Now, maybe you could say I'm self-sabotaging with my unpolished look or whatever, it could be. That could be past conditioning too that I'm reacting to. But regardless, I know that when I show up and I feel comfortable, I don't think I purposely try to be unattractive, but I show up and I'm comfortable as I am here. I don't have to be anything different online than I am walking around in real life. That's the point, right? The way I'm walking around in real life is the way I'm here on camera with you. And because the baseline is a level of confidence and comfort, that is what makes social media sustainable. The authenticity and therefore the lack of using energy to keep up an image is what makes social media sustainable. And someone else said it brilliantly, Gary Vaynerchuk said, document, don't create. Document, don't create. Create means creating content. I gotta create myself, I gotta create some image. I gotta create something brilliant for people. And he said, no, no, no, just document your journey. Document your journey, meaning I'm going along my journey and I'm gonna show you what my journey is like. I'm gonna show you the journey of my mind. I'm gonna show you the journey of my mistakes and how I recover from my mistakes. I'm gonna show you the journey of my accomplishments and the peak experiences that I have. I'll share those with you too. Document all of that and document your evolution. When do you stop evolving? Never. So when do you stop documenting? Never.  I barely do any private journaling actually, I journal mostly publicly. No, I do some, I do some, but as you document and publicly journal, you're on social media, as much as you can distributing your authentic content everywhere, you're naturally gonna draw the people who resonate with your energy signature and therefore it seems that they are patient enough to stick with you through the thick and the thins, through the days when you feel not so attractive and through the days when you are having an up energy, all of it. And that is your true fan base. And that's how you can sustain social media long enough to become ever more skillful and confident because skill and confidence come from practice. You sustain your presence long enough, consistently enough that you become truly skillful, ever more skillful and you become truly more attuned to what is the intersection between your authenticity and what the world yearns for. That intersection takes time to sense into and it takes practice to sense into. So you've got to show up sustainably on social media. There's no better way, there's no better place for you to really discover your calling. If you're gonna do it without social media, how are you going to have all these experiments and tests that allow you, and the algorithm by the way is your friend, the algorithm is not some enemy to like battle and try to game.  And most people are not your true fan which is why you don't get likes on most of your content but it keeps testing your content in front of a bunch of different kinds of people until if, oh wait, this one person liked your thing and liked it again and maybe this other thing they didn't like but they liked this one. The algorithm is our friend to help us test without social media you don't have this kind of powerful algorithm for you to keep testing your authenticity and that intersects you between your authenticity and what the world yearns for and to find that sliver, that just right audience. So please stop demonizing social media. It's a genius, brilliant algorithm for your authentic expression. That's what it is. That's how I see it anyway. So I hope this is helpful. May this inspire you to show up more sustainably on social media knowing that it's about like an authentic friendship. And I hope this helps.


So let's talk about the elephant in the room. Topology. What is it? Should you care? When, why, and how? So first off, yes. Topology is very important. And anyone who tells you otherwise has no idea what they're talking about. That is why we get rid of vertex clusters early on if we can. Now within this area of topology being important, there's a radical fringe vocal minority of raging anti-triangle elitist terrorist groups that I call the tri-police. And what they do is they look at your model and in all caps, type things like, what the fuck, bro? Are those triangles? Triangles are illegal, you dipshit. Why would anyone pay money for this awful model?  Geez, man, those triangles really ruined the play experience, bro. Yes, those are real people.   Yes, you should always strive for quads, but triangles do have strategic purpose in modeling. The best modelers in the world know how to use triangles to control lighting, rigging, and staying under the poly count. Depending on your art style, triangles may actually even be necessary to achieve the look. For example, if you are modeling anime style shading in order to replicate the shadows correctly, it's often super useful to guide the shadows with triangles. Sometimes they help the weight painting process and prevent unwanted parts of the model from looking deformed when animating. For example, I'm pretty sure that the triangle here is to accentuate the outline of her leg, because I noticed on my model that without that line there, it breaks the leg of the shape when bending up. But the most common reason is it can hugely reduce the poly, especially if you know that most of the lighting and shading is going to be done artificially on your texture map. This is actually the secret to the League of Legends art style. Almost all of the detail is a texture map, which means that any weird topology that the rendering engine would have shaded probably won't ever be seen, because the texture map has a built-in ambient occlusion map that dominates the shadows. So they get to use all the triangles they want to save poly count, and you never notice it, which is how the models look so good, even when the poly count is insanely low. Like, you could have made her claws quads, I guess. Then you would have had to add a lot more poly in order to keep everything consistent and aligned up with the quads. But why would you, when it looks great with tries, keeps the poly count low? But most importantly, probably have zero effect on the player experience. And even when you're not trying to keep the poly count low, like in Dead or Alive, where the priority of the game is for the girls to look and animate as beautiful as possible, guess what we find when we transition from a low poly area, like her legs, to a high poly area, like her ass. That's right. Strategically placed power move triangles, because it's useful. It keeps your topologies shape and connects everything just fine. And I'd be willing to bet my life that nobody complained about the triangles when the game came out. So to clear things up with my topology and the reason why you see so many tries in my tutorials is because I took this concept to the extreme. I wanted to get the smoothest weight painting possible with the lowest poly count possible. Because at the time she was created, weight painting was the series we were on. And I had to work fast. So for me, if I could delete or merge a vertex and not notice any visual difference when weight painting and animation, then I took it out. Now keeping the poly count low is not nearly as important for me anymore. So next year, I'll actually be going through the process of making a more traditional quad-oriented topology version of Blender. I just haven't had time to do it in the middle of uploading tutorials, which brings me to my final point. If you are a beginner, I highly recommend that you just focus on getting the model's basic shape done and then fixing the topology later, because you can really fix it at any time. It's best to fix it before the rigging process, but sometimes that's not an option and it's okay. Because the truth is the main topology process is usually a separate thing from the modeling process, especially if you are a sculptor. And generally, if you are a professional or striving to be a professional, you would usually have tools that do most of the work for you. I don't re-topologize in Blender. That's actually one of the few things I still do in Maya because I did the math. And if you are spending more than three hours a month re-topologizing your character, you are actually wasting money because three hours a month working any minimum wage job in the US is enough to pay for the indie version of Maya. Or you can get the student version for free, which automatically does all the re-topologizing for you. Like here, I'll show you why it's a waste of time to re-topo your own stuff. In Maya, you can feed it any object you want. You could have the shittiest topology in the world. It really doesn't matter. And when you finished modeling the shape, you literally type the words remesh, give it a second, and then type in the words re-topo, give it another second, and bam, you're done. Topology completed. Oh, is 2000 faces too much for you? You wanted 960 instead? Sure thing, 960 faces, done. Oh, what's that? You changed your mind? You really only wanted 400 faces? Not a problem, done. This is why you as the modeler should really just focus on the shape because the software is supposed to handle the topology. You as the artist should be spending most of your time designing the shape of your art. Not worrying about whether it's triangles or quads. You work at McDonald's for three hours a month and you can read to apologize pretty much anything automatically. That's why I don't waste my time doing it and that's why I don't recommend using your time to do it either. If you're really serious about modeling, you might change a few things here and there, but it's usually gonna be automatic.  If they don't use triangles and you're trying to emulate their style, okay, then maybe you shouldn't use triangles either. But if they do use triangles, then try to notice when they use them. Think about why, because that's probably when you should use them. But just don't get hung up on it because listen, if you haven't read to apologize to your models yet, but your players are loving your game or your animation or whatever, that is the most important thing. Are people happy with your work? Does it look good for the audience that it's made for? At the end of the day, that's really the only thing that should ever matter. So seriously, relax, you're fine.  There's a lot of tools out there to do it automatically for you. If you don't like Maya, there's a lot of other tools you can use to do it too. Either way, hope that clears things up and maybe makes you feel better. If you enjoyed this video, please don't forget to ring that bell. It's the only way you'll know when I upload new stuff. Hope you have a fantastic day. Now, see you around.


via the internet, why is there latency for countries that are further away if your claim is that light is instantaneous? Because it's not light. It's bits of data. That's a different thing. Fibroxy uses light to transfer data. Yeah, but it's still not light. It's data. No, it's literally light. Fibroxy cables literally use light to transfer data. So your claim is that light is instantaneous, which means that there should never be any lag when I'm playing Call of Duty against my friends in America. However, when I'm playing against my friends in America, there is a noticeable latency compared to when I'm playing my friends in the United Kingdom. Right? But in that light, in those cables, it has to travel further. So you can notice a latency of seven times, going around seven times a second. So it's a seventh of a second.  And when you are playing against people in other areas, the latency is always a lot higher. Okay. That's more to do for your servers and different distributors and all the rest. It's got nothing to do with the speed of light. It's instantaneous. It's light to the fire earth. It's not light. I'll re-ask him a question. So, Iron, answer that question. But then I got another question for you. So I'm just saying it's not really light itself. I mean, it's data going through multiple ports, multiple channels. And of course, that's how you're going to notice the lag. And the extra that went from directly from A to B, you didn't see the lag. And another, oh no, you're good. $5 Super Chat from Norman Dixon. I navigated ships in the Navy Ross. Why do ships in the open ocean have to make predetermined course changes to get to their destinations? That's a pretty simple one because as we know, all navigational charts were based on this circular map made with the northern pole sitting right in the center. So of course, if you're going east or west, then you're just going in large circles, which makes sure that then your compass point is always pointing towards north when the other side is always pointing south. So if you're going across a very large distance across the ocean, it would make far more sense to work out the shortest route rather than follow the old fashioned compass and follow a line of latitude. You want to take the shortest route. So of course, as you keep moving, then north you have to keep adjusting for. And that's why your charts won't keep on matching because you have to keep adjusting because north is moving and you're moving laterally. You're muted. So. Oh. $5 from F3 stop motion. Fight the Flat Earth. Sounds like a jag off just shouting over the other guy. Oh, the spice is real. It is. And feel bad. Fight the Flat Earth. Might actually be getting a drink at the second of all the times that I'm here. I am sending spice. I didn't love to fight the Flat Earth. Ah, da, da, da, da. Victor Holluck, $5. Super Chat, Iron Horse. Do you agree that lying, deceiving, or misleading children is a form of violence? Maybe it's too far for this to be told to kids. I wouldn't call it a form of violence. It's a form of mental manipulation. But, you know, we all grew up with it.  But we all do it. Everybody grows up with some sort of things.  You know, most of us went to church on a Sunday. We grew up thinking that that's the right way to be. Teach us your morals and teach all this sort of stuff. And then you think you're learning stuff by going to school that you think is correct.  They don't teach you any real life skills. They barely teach you how to plant a seed and grow a garden.  And that's never really going to change until people come to their senses and say, hey, these people that have been in control of our world for this last century or so, all they care about is having a bunch of mind-controlled slaves that don't think for themselves. They don't want to think for themselves. They're much better off believing what they're told, trust in the authorities, obey, obey, obey.   And as if that's some sort of life. I mean, is this the way we want to bring up our children? I'd say that mental slavery probably is a form of abuse, but I wouldn't say that it's a sult necessarily, just mental abuse. $5 Super Chat from Connellx Silverfur. $5 Reflectors on the Moon are a fact. Confirmed thousands of times each year. How did they get there if we did not go to the Moon? Iron Horse, don't dodge. Yeah, and that's just another belief, isn't it? Like if the Moon was made out of a molten substance in the first place, there should be plenty of places that have a bit of a mirror-like finish in the bottom of the craters, which is quite an interesting thing when we talk about craters on the Moon, is that they all seem to be roughly perfectly circular. They're all shallow. None of them look like results of a huge impact, which would create a huge divot in the bottom. They're all flat and level with a perfectly round surface. Some of them even intercrossing one another, exactly like you'd expect bubbles bursting on the surface of a liquid molten substance. So, of course, there'd be some reflective places. You don't have to put a retro reflector up there. What's a retro reflector anyway? From the 60s, I guess, there's retro. But you don't need a retro reflector. As I said, they were sending lasers to the Moon in the 50s, like when they first had lasers and they were doing the same experiments they're doing today. It proves nothing. If you can get a telescope... They weren't doing the same experiments, no. I'm nearly finished, Greg. Hold horses. If you get a strong enough telescope and you zoom in on this retro reflector and you get a clear picture of it that we can prove is not CGI or made in a computer, then maybe I will accept that the Moon is a physical thing that we've landed on and we left stuff up there. But we can't prove that. It's just another belief. More pseudoscience that the globe relies upon for their belief. I mean, the Chinese orbiter literally saw the things there. And yeah, we have been doing laser experiments on the Moon for a long time. However, we were able to do it a lot more accurately with the retro reflector. So accurate in fact that we're able to see how much the Moon is moving away from us each year by just a few millimeters. So you can literally point a laser at the point on the Moon where the retro reflector is and get a much stronger signal back than if you point it just to the side, showing that there is something there reflecting the laser. Iron, you're the last word, but then fight the flat Earth. I've got a question for you. How could you accurately point anything at anything if you're moving sideways at 67,000 miles an hour? The Moon itself is moving 2,280 miles an hour in another direction, as the Sun itself is moving half a million miles an hour and we're supposed to be able to send a laser beam exactly to this tiny little what, two-foot squared retro reflector and have it come back to us in enough time that we haven't shut off in the space a million miles away. That's just more pseudoscientific belief that actually proves- I think pseudoscience about that it's all just your incredulity. Even if it were possible that we're on a stationary plane or Earth with the Moon just hovering wafting around above us. And $5 comment really from F3 stop motion but he wants to know fight the flat Earth while you're shouting.  Thank you F3 stop motion. Jack the surgeon, $2 super chat. Thank you so very much. Is a two-a-tara a lizard? Is it two-a-what? It is a T-U-A-T-A-R-A. A two-a-tara. Is it a lizard? Twa? No idea. Thank you so very much, Jake the surgeon. And all right, moving along, $5 super chat from Jesse L. Fight the flat Earth. If gravity pulls down to center mass then a compass would point down also. No, compasses follow the magnetic field of Earth. However, compasses do have one side heavier than the other to keep one end up and that's why you specifically have to have different compasses for the northern and southern hemisphere. So when you actually look at a compass, gravity is pulling part of it down because you hold it flat and then it follows the magnetic field of Earth. But a compass doesn't work on gravity. So $2 super chat from Jake the surgeon, Mr. E. Quine. Mr. Horace, can you divide by zero? There you go. $2 super chat from BeetleTuba. Craig, there are light slo-mo videos online. Yeah, people have been sending to me videos of those. The slo-mo people, what are they called? Planet slo-mo, filming the speed of light at 10 trillion frames per second. That's the slo-mo guys, I'm going to have to check that out. So maybe you want to look at that as well, Ross, to see that light actually travels. And a $2 super chat from BeetleTuba again. Also, Fight the Flat Earth is doing great flat needs evidence. Thank you. He's doing great at repeating the lies of his pseudo-science masters and the high press of scientism. Ross, hold on, we confirmed that you're the one doing pseudoscience. We confirmed that earlier, remember? No, no, no, no, if I'm going to... You do things that don't follow the scientific method, therefore it is pseudoscience. And if I'm doing it, it's real, if you're doing belief in other people in higher authorities... No, I don't have beliefs, I have evidence and logic. And again, we confirmed earlier, you were the one doing pseudoscience. Well, you confirmed. Get the feeling both of you were on the spot. That's $2 super chat again from BeetleTuba. Thank you. Ross is trolling you, Craig. How do you do it? Patience. I've got two young children. They've prepared me for this. Although talking to my two young children is usually more of an attendant conversation than talking to flat earthers, of course. Ross, I'm the one that has to listen to your stupidity. So I'm the one that has to... Well, I'm the one that has to put up with your scientism beliefs that you keep parroting that you never did before. Again, I don't have scientism beliefs. I base my position on evidence and logic. There's no evidence or logic for your beliefs.   I've got lots that are modern and up-to-date. Convex and concave lens can't apply. That's all you had. We've got hundreds of other videos that don't have a convex and concave lens that show the earth is flat. Show me one. I have asked flat earthers this for years. Show me one single high-altitude balloon that is not fisheye that shows the earth to be flat. I'll give you £500. Iron, you can have a statement on that. Fight the flat earth. Have a comment. Not a question for the final word. I could send you a link to that, Craig. £500, no problem. Yeah. It has to be a non-fisheye lens. Not a 3D camera. Not any kind of wine angle. It has to be a non-fisheye, low field of view lens, showing the earth to be flat. Because you know what, I have looked and there is no such one. There is none that exists. Hey, good-bye. Ten dollars from Jake, the surgeon. Thank you so much for the support. You agree that you need to be more thorough with the skeletons, but assume a light is instant based on superficial observation. Mr. equine, you're not very convincing. Say that again. Something to do with skeleton. You agree that you need to be more thorough with the skeletons, but assume that light is instant based on superficial observation? No, well, this thing about light being instantaneous has actually come from like years and years of listening to people who actually are authorities in the matter. I can't specifically quote somebody at the moment, but I just know for a fact that it's been said enough times and I've made enough observations that that is the fact. We are not looking at millions of years in the past every time we look at the night sky. Now, if I looked at a couple of skeletons, well, yeah, I could take some forensics to that and I could probably tell you the difference if it really came down to it, but it's not something that I've ever had to experience before. So it's another furphy of somebody trying to look at something completely unrelated to the fact that light exists. And in fact, light doesn't even exist except we've got photoreceptors in our eyes which our brains can interpret and make it light. No, it doesn't. It's like a tree falling in the forest doesn't make a sound if no one's there to hear it. If there's nobody there to observe light, then light doesn't exist. The three-way observation between the person who observes it, the thing that creates it and the medium in between where it occurs in. Light does not exist. How are we thinking right now if light doesn't exist? There's plenty of observers. So we have about five more minutes until I'm going to close off SuperChats. And so if you want your SuperChats to be read, make sure you get it within the next five minutes by doing a thank both of our interlocutors for joining us tonight. $5 from BeetleTuba. Flat. Do you have any research? Where aside from living, have you found your information? Research papers show us something like Fight the Flat Earth did. Well, yeah, I recently saved another. Every time I come across a really good documentary that adds more and more evidence to my side of belief or understanding of the nature of reality, is I'll add it to my playlist. I've got a playlist on my channel. The one I usually add all my new ones to is called Helios and Prism Busted. And the latest one says 44 documents provided by NASA and the government that clearly state the Earth is flat and non-rotating. 44 of them, official... Not one of them. Not a single one of those says the Earth is flat and non-rotating. Not a single one. I guarantee you right now you will not be able to find anything that says the Earth is flat in them. They make assumptions... Again, they make assumptions for modelling, right? None of them say the Earth is flat. They make assumptions for modelling, right? And let's talk about one particular paper which is talking about a rigid aircraft of constant mass travelling over a flat plane. Well, let's talk about the things that don't exist in that, shall we? Rigid aircraft of constant mass, that doesn't exist. It also talks about Rigid aircraft do not exist. It's about rigid aircraft flying above a stationary flat... And rigid aircraft do not exist.  Never do aircraft of constant mass. They were made out of elastic, are they? In a different mass...  So what? So aircraft are not rigid.  Of course not. Aircraft are not rigid. Ross, this is a fact. And Iron, last statement. No question though, statement. Really grasping at strollers. There we go. Mr. E-Man for $5, Iron Horse, please explain the 74 gears latest challenge for Flat Earthers. I think that's where we've got another failed... What do we call them? Those false flag actors, whatever they send out. So this guy failed. He keeps on putting out challenges and they say, no, I'm not doing it. No, you've got to do it. I'm going to invent a whole new airline for you guys and I'll take you there. No, no, I'm not going to do it. He's literally telling us to do it ourselves. He's offering to fly the plane for you.    What he says is if you guys organise it, you get the plane booked and you do it then, he will fly the plane for you. He will physically fly the plane. He is a pilot, you numpty. He's shown videos of him flying his plane. He's not a pilot. He's literally a pilot. So you're lying. Ross, all you've got is lies. Stop lying. He says that they don't even make their own routes and yet we have other pilots that tell us they do make their own routes. They have to work all that stuff out before themselves. They have to work on how much fuel. Are you going to go on the flight? Are you going to make excuses? He's not a pilot. He is literally a pilot. He is literally a pilot. He's literally the most fake actor we've ever seen. He's literally a pilot. He's literally a pilot. Stop telling lies. Stop telling lies, Ross. We have about that. He tried to make one of these flights happen a couple of years back. He made 20 great flights. The whole thing just disappeared. What a great little scam that was. That's never going to happen. Maybe you should look into what actually happened there. He's literally a pilot, Ross. Stop telling lies. If he was literally a pilot, he's still making constant excuses as to why it's not going to happen because he's not going to do it. He's literally saying he can fly the plane for you. They can't even make the route go that they literally will fly it for you. He will fly the route for you. He won't. We've got six more questions and then I'm going to let both sides wrap up and show or tell what they got going on in the interwebs. But... doo doo doo A $5 Super Chat from Mr. E-Man Iron Horse These debunk Professor Phil Bell Bell's, I assume, explanation of circular star trails and why star trails should be optical on a flat earth. Good friend of mine, Phil Bell, you know, he actually sent something to the moon. I mean, it crashed into the moon. I didn't realize it was for you, Craig. I didn't realize that was for you. I was just saying hello to my friends.  In fact, that thing would be more correct if we're on a globe. Because the globe is going around like a 40,000 kilometer radius. So the more you're looking at a single point, the more that shouldn't just be even oblate. It should be more like one part closer. So it's more like, I don't know, like, I don't know what the name of that shape is. It's not like an oblong. It's like an oblong with one small end, like egg shaped sort of thing. That's how the star circles should appear from a globe. But because it's the stars themselves which are moving in perfect circles around the midpoint polaris, that's why wherever we look at them from, we'll always see them making perfect circles because that's the way they are moving, not the way we are moving. And a $10 super chat. Thank you so very much from Norman Dixon. Ross, what are those magnetic compasses for navigation typically? Your answer to my question was nonsense. Just say you don't know something when you don't know. Well, actually, I described why we didn't use a magnetic compass, didn't I? I said we don't use the magnetic compasses anymore, but back in the day when all navigation was done using a magnetic compass, that's why the latitude lines are big circles bigger and bigger, the further away from polaris you get, which actually happens to align perfectly with magnetic north centre. So that's the way our charts are made and we're still using the same charts today. Now, we have different technology today. It's called GPS, which stands for Ground Positioning System. That's a lie. Fixed radio signals to ping from different points so we can triangulate exactly where we are and that's the way navigation works today. So we can go in straight line without having to align a magnetic compass any longer. I'm not finished, Craig. I'm answering the question. I've got a question for you. Yeah, well, you can ask it in a minute. We're talking about fixed points from towers sending out signals which then can then give you an exact location of where you are. If we're using satellite zooming through the skies, where zooming through the sky and all this other sort of thing you guys believe in, it wouldn't work. But because we have fixed towers everywhere, we've got ships with their own technology which are mobile signals so we can also detect where they are in relation to our position. The navigation now works off basically radar. It's been advanced a bit because we can have computer programs into things to show a technical outlay on the maps that we can use. That's why we're not using a magnetic compass anymore. As I said in the first video, we're using a short system that we can determine because we know that the Earth is flat. We're not going to have a huge amount of water. Now you can ask me a little question, Craig. So, answer and then he still has to ask the final word. So, Ross, why do aeroplanes have GPS receivers on top? Well, because it's the most logical place to have them, isn't it? They get damaged on the bottom. You said that GPS is ground positioning systems, yet planes have their GPS receivers on the top. Think about it. You can call it the top if you want to. I mean, it's definitely the top. It's a bit pointing towards the sky. Okay, I'll answer to you. It's not pointing towards the sky at all. It's because the radio waves are being beamed out from the towers 360 degrees from every tower and so they're still going to hit the plane somewhere regardless whether it's the top or bottom or side or whatever. They're still going to hit it somewhere, so you put it at the top because that's the most safe and sensible place to have it. The GPS receivers point directly into space. Iron last word, but no questions. Nothing's pointing in the space. You've just got more surface area between the top and the bottom of it receiving the signal that's not pointing in the space whatsoever. It's ridiculous. You've got more surface area pointing out sideways. And then a $10 super chat from Victor Holluck. Thank you so very much, Victor. Fight the Flat Earth. Thank you for being a frontline of defense. I personally had some horrific instances of being taught dangerous pseudo ideas that were never challenged and it hindered me in school and life. I'm really happy that you managed to break out of the cold light mentality of the Flat Earth force on you. It's unfortunate that when you get indoctrinated in that way and this is why Flat Earth is such a dangerous thing because it is an indoctrination. It is a brainwashing. It is a cult that literally ruins lives. So I'm really happy for you that you've managed to break out of that stupidity. Congratulations. I can't believe Craig didn't realize the sarcasm in that because all the indoctrinations send everybody towards your heliocentric dialect this person sorry is trying to be sarcastic to you and thanking you for saving him. The actual fact Flat Earth is the escapism from the indoctrinated. Flat Earth is the escapism from reality. Where we start to think for ourselves and stop believing the indoctrination. Do you never fall for yourselves in your life?  Sight one source that says light doesn't exist. You can't. There's darkness. Darkness is the absence of light. So there's examples of that. Once you get above where our light exists. Above the B, it's dark. And so this is going to be the final question. It is for Iron and so after that I'm going to give it back over to fight the Flat Earth for their final statement but a $5 Super Chat from BeetleTuba Flat Why don't you trust the professionals in the field? I'm in a scientific field. Dude, we're normal people no one is trying to hurt you with a globe. Okay, well I don't trust mainstream science basically because all they're doing is earning a career. If you speak up against that you get shunned. You no longer have a job. You kick outside the community. You have to go along. You have to follow the mainstream. If you dare turn up like this one famous engineer his name Brian he was an engineer, trained engineer and so he started investigating the Flat Earth and he found all sorts of reasons why the Flat Earth works and why the globe doesn't. And so what happened to him? He lost his career so he had to basically drop his channel because obviously our first concern is always with our family and making a living and paying our rent or our mortgage and our bills and that's almost modern science really is. It's all about having a career. Whereas when you really look into it all these careers are coming off the backs of selling us snake oil. I think it was $700 or $70 billion or something that Pfizer made profit. That's above and beyond all their costs just in the last year alone from all their vaccinations. So why would I trust somebody who is making a massive profit and I'm not saying any benefit to mankind from it.   You're obviously dead and buried because you've got an agenda. You want world de-population and it's highly profitable on the way to get rid of us all and we're standing up. And all right. I'm going to read these out but I'm really just going to give it back over to the people. Thank you so much Bode McFace for 666 Wolf 0620 as great vids of Sith Star trails from Perth Ross Stop Lying and $5 Super Chat from Norman Dixon Ross More Nonsense. You know nothing about navigation. Just say you don't. Iron you can answer that on your ending if you want. We're just throwing that out there because I am thanking both of our interlocutors and I'm handing it back over to fight the flat earth so they could give their last statement and also say what they got or where they got going on. Hey guys I'm FTFE So today what's happened is Ross has gone over and over and over. Ross's entire argument is an argument for fragility. Oh that doesn't make sense to me.  Oh I can't believe that happens. Frankly I don't care about your incredulity. It doesn't matter. Science doesn't need you to agree with it to still be true. That's the wonderful thing about science is it's still going to be facts whether you're smart enough to realize it or not. I showed evidence of my claims. I showed clear evidence of the earth being curved. Clear evidence of the earth rotating. Clear evidence that we have been to space. Ross went nut up. I asked for evidence. He couldn't give any. I asked for evidence. He couldn't give any. So there's nothing you know there's no argument here. Ross didn't bring an argument. I will again say thank you to Ross for jumping in. I know it's last minute and I know it's probably quite early for you over there in Australia. And I do appreciate you jumping in because Howard was far too scared to debate me with the format that we agreed. So despite the fact that I very much appreciate you taking my sincere thanks for jumping on and having this debate and not wasting modern-day debates time. If you want to see more of me then please head over to my channel ftfeyoutube.com new debates every week new debate shorts every Sunday new episodes of flirts of idiots coming and the launch of FTFE 2.0 very soon where I'll be doing a bunch of science documentaries working alongside people like Professor Dave and Kyle Hill. So Amy, I do appreciate it. Absolutely. Thank you so very much Fight the Flat Earth and with that Iron, the floor is all yours. Tell us what you got going on and your final statement on the subject. Yeah, thanks Amy. I do find it quite incredulous really like this is my only argument from incredulity because everything I do is based on facts. Everything I've said is factual. There's no observation of motion. There's no observation of any other utter nonsense that the Helioists like Craig has to defend and defend vehemently and try and then put down their opponent personally in order to defend. And yet these people are actually making a living. They're making a profit him and Professor David whatever his name is all these people actually making a profit of debunking or refuting the truth. Whereas I've never made a cent, a single cent of Flat Earth and I never intend to. Everything I do I do for free. I've never monetised anything on my channel even though I might have tried to way back in the early days. Now I don't even have a thousand subscribers so you know if you can try and increase my content to a thousand subscribers would be great because that way I can at least do some live streams with my only means of doing a live stream with my mobile device until you've got a thousand subscribers you can't do that and my laptop is rooted the camera and the microphone are both pretty terrible. So there's no point trying to do a live stream from that. I'd rather be out in the field showing real live Flat Earth evidence as it exists while I'm talking about it otherwise all I can do is I can record videos and later upload them and I don't intend to make any money out of it unlike these trolls on the edge of society who are just they've got all their different little followers and there's a lot of them because none of them want to have their illusion shattered that's why they can have thousands and thousands of subscribers and make a living off it and they can use all through their videos and then try and accuse us if say a famous Flat Earther does have some ads and yet they're making a profit of trying to fight the truth and that's all we are, it's all we're concerned about well we don't care if the Earth is flat and round or late, you name it if you can provide evidence for it and convince me I will change my mind and I will go back to being a heliologist like I grew up being but as Craig said you know your mind is being a true scientist that's what we have done we've grown up with our indoctrination and we've escaped it and it's like they say if a snake unable to shed its skin will cease to be a snake, it will suffocate it and kill it, we've shed our skins we've moved forwards, not saying we're snakes it's just an analogy but we can move forward into the truth and that's all we're worried about if we can see evidence for curvature okay I might believe it but there's no evidence of how convergence works he showed no evidence of spin he showed evidence of a pendulum moving backwards and forwards, he showed almost fish eye lens it's a wide angle lens showing evidence for curvature there's no curvature, as I said he's going to pay me £500 when I send him evidence of Eric DeBay's most recent video of the high altitude run and level and so basically I'm going to make a profit for once and a profiteering anti-flat earther he's got nothing better to do with his life so yeah, you can find me on my channel Iron Horse, I really don't care I'm not in it for the money I'm not in it for the following, I'm not in it for the fans I'm just in it for the truth and that's all I care about and that's why I'll come to these debates even as the last minute thing even though it's against Craig who's shown himself to be the most atrocious person to ever have to debate against on the whole entire internet maybe Professor Dave comes closer I don't know but otherwise, thanks for having me and I'll gladly come back from the channel and defend my position any all time Woohoo! Thank you both and with that I do want to thank you all for joining us out here on Modern Day Debate we are a neutral platform welcoming everybody from all walks of life if you're looking for more fantastic debates in the future please don't forget to like and subscribe including tonight's debate on Flat Earth Glober vs Flat Earther with our interlocutors Fight the Flat Earth and Iron Horse plus if you'd like what either of our guests said tonight all of our links are in the description below if you're looking for more fun after the show there will be an after party on the MDD Discord and with that I am Amy Newman with Modern Day Debate and we hope you continue having great conversations, discussions and debates Good night everyone Mwah! Thanks Amy


Michael what's going on good to see you great to see you guys great to see you Michael how are we doing? Thank you for coming This is a love car man So remember how I told you your Christmas present is a little late So I kind of mom knows so you and one person are gonna go to the Super Bowl Michael hotel flight in the Super Bowl man So I hope you're ready for Arizona buddy Oh So it's gonna be fun. We're gonna be able to hang out have a good time. So yeah, so you won't person get to go to the Super Bowl Michael Yeah Okay, we'll talk. I'm so excited


This video is part of an online Algebraic Geometry course on Scheme Theory and This lecture will be about showing that the spectrum of a ring really is a locally ring space So we'll just recall the definition the spectrum of a ring so the points of The spectrum are just prime ideals The topology is given as follows The sets D F which the set of prime ideals P with F Not in P former base for the topology You can think of these as being Informally something like the points where the function f doesn't vanish except that f isn't a function It's just an element of a ring but if you if you pretend it's a function on speck of R then this would be the set of points where the function doesn't vanish and The sheaf structure is defined by saying that the Sheaf at of the open set OD of F is just our Sort of localized at F. So you forcibly invert the element F And the question is is this a sheaf? Well, the answer is it isn't a sheaf yet because we've only defined it on some of the open sets Not all of the open sets. However, the first point is that we can define a sheaf On a set X By defining it on elements of a base Because then it's automatically defined on any other open set because you can cover the open set by open sets in the base And we would like the base to have the property that It's closed under Intersection this makes things convenient and you notice these open sets form a base that is closed under intersection because Df Intersection DG is the prime ideals Not containing F or G which is just the same as the prime ideals not containing FG and to do this we just need to check the sheaf condition for Covers of a base element you buy base elements Ui So in other words if we've got an element you that's a union of your elements you I then given Elements of the sheaf for each of these open sets you which you can think of informally as being functions on these open sets If they're compatible on the intersections, then there's a unique element of the sheaf of you So a key point in handling sheaves Of schemes is to restrict attention to these rather special open sets because they're much easier to handle And this property means that you don't really need to pay too much attention to the other open sets I'm not going to prove this. It's just a fairly routine piece of bookkeeping Anyway before going on this leads to the question What are what do you do if you for some reason you need open sets not of this form? It's not very common for this In fact anybody using open sets not of the form DF is probably up to no good But if you do need to handle them you can handle them as in the following example So let's take R to be C XY and Which you can think of as being an affine plane and I'm going to take two sets first of all, I'm going to take you one You can set you one to be the set of points where X is Not zero at least the set of closed points where X is not zero and you too Will be the set of points where Y is not zero Well, more precisely you one is just the set DX and You two is a set dy The prime ideal is not containing X or not containing Y. So the sheaf condition says that Supposedly want to know what oh of you one union you two is So this is going to be Roughly speaking, it's the complex plane minus a point if you would it ignore the none closed points and The sheaf condition says that an element of this is given by an element of oh you one and an element of oh you two Which have the same image when you restrict them to oh you one intersection you two So we need to work up what these various rings are Well, oh you one is just C of X Y X the minus one polynomials in X Y next the minus one and oh you two It's just C X Y Y to the minus one and it's obvious what oh you one intersect you two is This is just C X Y X the minus one Y to minus one so An element of this ring here consists of a polynomial F in the first ring and a polynomial G in the second ring Which have the same image in here and in this particular case It's very easy because these two rings are both sub rings of that one So the polynomials must actually be equal. So you must have some rational function Which only is poles where X is norton only as poles where Y equals norton. It's kind of obvious that this implies F is polynomial in X and Y so the For the sheaf Spec of R for this ring if we want to know what oh of this set is it turns out to be just the ring of all polynomials again, so it's in fact the same as the Ring you get associated to the whole of the spectrum of R anyway, let's continue with the Proof that the spectrum of R really is a sheaf so we need to show Suppose we're given a Basis of an open set that's even the union of some other open sets So here's here's DF and it's going to be the union of several other things So this might be DFI and so on And we need to check the sheaf condition in other words given Elements of the sheaf of all these open sets that are compatible. We have to show there's unique element of the sheaf of this open set and The proof of this isn't really terribly difficult, but it involves a lot of rather confusing bookkeeping So before giving the heart of the proof We're first thing to simplify the problem by by making several reductions. So the first reduction is we can replace R by R F to the minus one and the point is the spectrum Of R F minus one has underlying set essentially DF So instead of Proving it for this set for the ring R. We can Just just prove it for the whole of the spectrum of a ring if we replace R by that in other words We can assume that F equals one and DF is the whole of the spectrum of R So We suppose The sets DFI cover the spectrum of the ring R And what does this actually mean? Well, it means There's no prime outside all the sets DFI So look at the ideal Generated by these Fi F1 F2 and so on and What we've shown is there is No prime ideal Containing this ideal in particular. There's no maximal ideal containing this ideal. So this ideal must be the whole of R so a1 F1 plus a2 F2 and so on plus a n Fn equals 1 for some AI in R Incidentally this argument shows that the spectrum of R is quasi compact Which is means the same as compact unless you're French So the point is that if you've got a cover of the spectrum of R by open sets of this base it means that you can write one as a linear combination of all these elements Fi and That automatically means you can write one as a linear combination of a finite number of them So the spectrum of R is actually covered by a finite number of these basis open sets And by the way, this is an example of a partition of unity And so a partition of unity in analysis means you've got some open sets covering a set And you try and write the identity function as a combination of Functions each of which has support in one of these open sets And you notice that this function has support in the open set Df1 in some sense and this is supporting the open set DF2 in some sense So so this is an analog of a partition of unity in analysis and Okay Next we're going to check separability And this is fairly straightforward. So we need to show that given R in the ring R, which is just O of the spectrum of R, of course Show that if if the R is not in all the sets Dfi so these should cover the spectrum of R Then R is equal to zero So let's think about what this means Well R being zero in the sets D of I means R the image of R is not in the ring R fi to minus one and this means This is the same as saying that fi to the ni R equals naught for some Ni so this is an equality in R Because you remember that something is zero in R fi to minus one if and only if it's killed by something in the multiplicative set generated by fi On the other hand, we are given that a1 f1 plus a2 f2 and so on plus a and fn equals naught Because these open sets Dfi cover the spectrum of R and now we use a very useful trick. We can replace Fi to the ni by fi and The point is that the prime ideals Not containing fi are the same as the prime ideals not containing fi to the ni so So if the Dfi cover R then the Dfi to the ni cover R so We can Just assume that all these exponents ni are equal to one an alternative way of seeing that is you notice if you raise this to a High power then in every term at least one of the fi's occurs to some high power So we can assume that Fi to the power of one times i equals naught for all i And now we can just write R is equal to R times sum of a i fi Which is equal to sum over a i fi R Which is equal to naught because We said fi R was equal to naught and We're also using the fact that The sum of the a i fi is equal to sorry. There's a type of that should be a one not a zero Next we want to check the sheaf condition so So I suppose speck of R is The union of various open sets Df1 union Df2 and so on so picture it like this is Df1 and here's Df2 and this whole thing is the spectrum of R and We recall that the ring of functions on Dfi It's just R fi minus one and now Suppose given our i over fi to the ni in In this thing here and Suppose they're compatible Well, what does this mean? Well, it means they have to have the same restriction on Dfi intersection Dfj. So this means that our i over fi The ni is equal to rj over fj to nj in the ring R fi to minus one fj to minus one And what does this mean? Well, this means by definition of equality in this ring that fj to the nj times our i minus our J fi to the ni Well, we can't deduce that this is not what we can deduce is that Fi fj To the nij times this is equal to zero because that's the condition for something to be zero in this ring and so This is the data we were given and we want to show that there is Is some R in the ring R? so that R is equal to r i over fi to the ni in R fi to minus one and What does this mean? Well, it means that fi to the mi Times fi to the ni R minus our i Is equal to naught in R So for some mi So that's what we've got to show we suppose that we're given elements R i and fi and They satisfy this condition and they also satisfy the condition that Some of a i fi equals one for some A i so this is the covering condition then we want to find an R satisfying that condition So we've got a rather messy looking algebraic problem And the first thing we need to do is to simplify to bits that we can see what earth is going on So let's simplify before solving first of all we can replace High powers Fi to the to the sum thing by fi Using exactly the same argument we used before if we do this And we find the conditions become sum of a i fi equals one with some different collection of numbers a i And we just have fi fj times R i fj minus r j fi Equals zero. So we're given numbers a i fi and r i Satisfying these conditions. Well, this is still too complicated We've got rid of all these exponents, but there are still too many f's in this equation But we can get rid of them as follows. We put s i equals r i f i and then we find s i fj squared minus s j fi squared is equal to naught well Now we've again got powers of the fi so we can do this trick again replace fi squared by fi That's before so it will still satisfy this condition for some other values of a i So we find that s i fj minus s j fi is equal to zero Now we've simplified our conditions to something where we have some hope of actually solving them So let's summarize what we've got to do so summary given a i fi s i with some of a i f i equals one and F i s j equals f j s i So these are our conditions and we want to find R so that f j R Equals s j for all j Now you may wonder why I'm not putting in a power of f j on both sides of this Well, it turns out we don't need it We've raised fi to such a high power in our simplifications that it turns out We've now got enough information to solve this without any extra f j's on the left or the right So Question is what is R going to be well, we can sort of guess what R is so Um From this Let's suppose that we found an R then figure out what R is well from this We find that R is equal to R times sum of a i f i and now um if we Write this as sum of a i F i R We can now By this condition here Notice we've got that condition here and so we find this is equal to sum of a i s i So this suggests what R has to be So now what we do is we define R to be sum of a i s i and Now in order to finish the proof we just have to check That f j R is equal to s j for all j Which is what we have to prove there So let's just calculate we notice that f j R Well, this is equal to f j times sum of A i s i and this follows from the definition of R So here we've got a definition of R and this gives us this quality here Um next we see this is equal to sum of a i f i s j and this follows from This condition here So you may think I've actually muddled up all the subscripts i and j But it turns out you can swap the subscripts i and j by using this condition here and finally We notice this is now equal to Equal to s j and for this just follows from this condition here So it's a fairly straightforward calculation although I It's actually a really confusing one. I'm too embarrassed to tell you how many times I had to re-record this lecture before getting it right So this verifies that the Spectrum of a ring really does satisfy the scheme property There's one final thing to check we just want to know what the stock Of the sheaf o of What what the stalk of the sheaf A spectrum of R at a point p is Well, this is the direct limit of the O of r of f i Minus one Sorry, it's it's the direct it's the direct limit of O of d F i which is r of f i minus one as Where where the sets d fi form a base For the open sets containing the point p And you can see this is just the localization r p Of r at the prime P so this this localization just means you invert or f i that Are not contained in the prime p And this is a local ring So the spectrum of r is locally ringed space And there's an alternative construction for the spectrum of r in hot show and where he more or less does this whole construction backwards instead of starting with the sets d fi And constructing the scheme and then deducing that you have these local rings at all the points what he does is he starts with a Sheaf Defined by these local rings at every point and deduces that the Value of the sheaf on these sets d of f i is r fi to the minus one so you can do it either way round Okay, the next lecture we will be discussing morphisms of schemes


Hello, everyone. Welcome back to another AI video. This is a quick one. We're in mid journey here, and I'm going to show you how to do color palette prompting using style references, the new S ref. Now, this is very easy to do, but it allows you to create images in the exact colors that you want it to. So here we go. Here is the palette that I chose. I'll show you how to get this.  It's pretty much perfect. Kind of war-holy, very, very cool stuff. Okay. So the first step is to get the color palette. If you've already got one, go ahead and just grab it.  I'm just going to go ahead and select this one right here. So I'm going to go ahead and I'm going to click on these little three dots. And then I'm going to go here and where is it? Where is it? Where is it? Export palette. That's what we're looking for. I'm going to export it as an image. It's very important. You make it an image and then I'll just call it cool colors, something like that. And then I'll click on export. Now, when you do that, it's going to automatically give you the color palette as an image. This case, it's a PNG. Just click on it and grab it. So I'm going to go ahead and grab that image right here. Now, back into mid-journey, very easy to do the first step. Just go ahead and drag and drop that image on top. And very importantly, you have to press enter. If you don't press enter, mid-journey for some reason doesn't automatically upload the image. It's a little weird. Most software does, but this one doesn't. So there you go. We've added in the image. Now I'm going to right click on this image and I'm going to copy the link. So I right click on it, copied link. So it's saved. Now, the next step is really easy. Just go forward slash, oops, or slash imagine. I'm going to go Bulldog, drinking, oops, drinking a coffee. There we go. Now, before I hit enter, I'm going to hit space. And then I'm going to go dash dash, S-R-E-F, space. And then I'm going to copy and paste in that link. I will put this exact, you know, in the description below. I'll put it exactly in the description below, but you have to have those spaces in there. Now press enter and watch what happens. It's going to go and it's going to say Bulldog, drinking a coffee, dash dash style reference. And then we've copied that link. We pasted it in. And then my other stuff is, you know, aspect ratio, 69. I'll come back when it's done and then I'll show you what we got. All right, welcome back. So here's what we got here. And some of them are pretty good. The bottom left one doesn't make too much sense. But if I click on it, we've got some nice bright reds and oranges and we've got different shades of red, kind of like what this image here has. So the yellow matches the sweater. And if you look up here at the one above it, this one has a little bit, I guess, nicer colors. You'll see here that this is all there is to it. So if you've got your own brand or you've got your own logo and stuff and you want to match colors, that's it, guys. Links in the description below. Thanks for watching.


So, only if you're lucky enough to hear those music or songs. Not bad, Nicholas. So, this was a web in my taste, trying to connect to the internet. It was a beautiful dialogue mode in Dining West. And out of the seven is this. Probably your mom or dad picked up the car and said, like, you said you would be studying it.  That's how the web development was in the 90s. We still have the table, don't we? Probably he's picking. So, this was how web was developed in the 90s and people thought JavaScript was just a tiny tool for getting those alert messages or probably having your mark use on click events, right? Let's fast forward from there to say 2005-ish where everybody thought making native apps was the cool day. Let's go app only. So, you go to the site to buy something or order something. It says, go to App Store or go to iOS to install and then go to your App Store or Google Store or Play Store to install the app, right? So, everybody was like, let's go app only. I let you guys to be in the slide. That's what happened with going app only. I'm going to take the use case of Shukrat. People have been involved with those guys who built the app and back you up in there. So, how many of you think, apart from engineers here or the end users will probably read what all the things the app is really accessing? Right? You'll probably reuse to the next guest. Install, accept all, kind of. You'll love that. So, you can see how the app is looking for cameras, SMS location, contacts and stuff like that. There might be new status for that. But my question is how many of the users were reading? I also read somewhere that Uber is accessing your browsing history. Why do Uber read your browsing history? Probably they're doing some statistics on free Wi-Fi. I don't know. I really don't know the use case, but I just read that Uber is using your access to your browsing history from that app, right? So, this app on native, people can give a random guess on what the size of this app would be or the things that it's doing on Android and iOS. Yeah, it's around 10 to 11 on Android and 40-ish on iOS, right? So, the question is why? Why do you really need so much of space and why do you want to access all this information without even prompting the user? Probably once the user gets to know us while he's installing the app and later on the apps can go and access whatever they want, right? So, here's a simple gif of the same thing with HTML5 CSS and some React. It's all JS and HTML. It does almost everything that the native apps except for probably picking up the contacts and reading the OTP and things like that, which it should be in the future. So, what would be the size of this if you pick up a guess? Including the cache, all the cache assets and stuff. 500? 500? Kilobots? Almost, it's around 700 kb. So, to make it clear it's not a race between web and native. You have to draw a middle line which works raw, right? So, if your use case is such that it needs a native app or probably there's something you need to use the contacts or some ideas that is not supporting probably a native would be the way to go. But if it's web that's solving your problems I think it would be web which would help you all the way around, right? So, it's not a race between web and native. It's about whichever solves your business whichever makes the end users happy and probably one might replace the other they might be something third which we have not heard which would come in the race and kill both of them, right? So, it's about that. I just wanted to make that clear before I proceed. Here's a simple use case. I'm not going to read all of them but I'm probably going to give you an example. Say if your friend doesn't have an app and you want to share it and ask your friend to install the app. What is the process you call it? If your app or say if they go and install this app then you would probably log into his app store and then download the application, install it and then use it for some time and then finally it's in a space or memory probably uninstall it, right? So, at each level if you're targeting around 800 or if your target number is around 800 audiences, right? For your application for each level there's a decrease of approximately 20%. So, by the time the user uses it it's 260 to be in this case. So, if it's web it would just be an URL the user would open it and use it instantly and the target would reach almost 100%. If your friend opens the URL it has access to it. But in the context if you see web is becoming more appy in nature and app is becoming more web-like. What do you mean by that? If you remember the GIF which we saw that it looks and feels like native app, right? It acts like a native app. And in the context we have some instant loading apps if you have heard of that like where Google is experimenting on loading a native app instantly on your device, right? So, that is more of a web kind of feel, right? If you click on an URL and it loads instantly. So, instant loading apps would always be web apps, right? So, just in use cases show what would be the reduction and with Flipkart what really happened was this. So, their load time decreased to 70 seconds from 3.5 minutes which is really big. And 3x more of engagement and 40% higher re-engagement rate 3x more time spent on the site. And 3x less data as we saw like it's around 700 MB versus 10 to 40 MB. So, here we are here to talk about progressive web apps. So, what are progressive web apps? This is a very nice illustration by Adios Manikha I'm just taking out this image. So, anything that's installable has a splash screen, works offline and it's connectivity independent. It doesn't matter but only a few have heard about how about LiveFi. Oh, the internet through the frequency. It's like LIE. I'm talking about LIE5. Jake from Google Game of Stump got a LiveFi where... Oh, it's LiveFi. No, it's not through the LiveFi. No, I'm talking about the LiveFi. Is it used for like the networks? No. Yeah, LiveFi is like fake Wi-Fi as in you're connected but your phone shows that you're connected on full Wi-Fi speed but you're not really connected. So, it should be connectivity independent as in it shouldn't matter whether you're on 4G, 5G or low G at all. It should still work fine. So, if you see this, it's all like an app like free. So, the name progressive as in progressive enhancement of course but the app eventually progresses itself to a beautiful native looking and feel like an app. So, what I mean to say that if you give it to a third party or an end user you should not be able to differentiate between a native app versus a web app. So, we saw this era where all these JavaScript programmers who played a bit with Node became a full stack developer overnight. So, I think people slowly become a progressive developer or a full stack progressive developer. So, the whole idea is to kill this and be killing that with something special which we're going to see now. Long users have been left staring at a white screen for too long. They've been let down by the cruel seas of network connectivity. And for too long we've been powerless to help Node. We've been left but no longer. All the promise is there. As I said, you have the control of the network and the network is controlling you. So, you can think of Service Worker as a client-side proxy. So, if your brother is here and your operating system is here you could think that the Service Worker is sitting here and it's smart enough to inspect all the network requests that happen. And it's not like application cache where you have to... How many of you use application cache? Good. The lesser the number the better because it was really a douche bag and because it has a lot of problems you have to mention all of the files that needs to be cached in your application or manifest and it's not truly offline as in you didn't have control on the network. But with Service Worker you get the real part to control each and every request. You could cache it. You could serve from the cache. You could do a network first on a cache-first strategy. You could see whichever wins would serve things like that. It's the most based IPI and it's highly influenced by shared workers and web workers. Shared workers are like enhanced web workers where web workers had the problem that each two web workers couldn't communicate with each other. That's where the shared workers came into picture. And the design principle is of error rateability. What I mean by that is say you make a request for a new URL and you're offline. Then you won't hit the cache and serve it. If it's not there in cache, you'll probably try to make a network request. So if both of them fail, if cache also fails and the network also fails, you should not end up showing a 404 page or a lineup. That's the error rateability part of it. And Service Worker has no access to the DOM elements but it has access to a few of the things here. It's set time out and you could have access to the navigator object and you have access to the location object and it's read-only. What I mean by read-only is you can see on what it is you can't just say location dot h traffic or something and do the navigation. You can't do that. You can just see on what page they are on. And you can of course talk to the other service workers. I would suggest you to go ahead and look into importance as well. It's one of the ideas that helps you to import GGS to your service worker. This stuff is more of a free cursor. I'm not probably going to dive into the coding details of it. We have three minutes left and let's see where we go from here. The Service Worker life cycle kind of looks like this. You have an installing phase and then you have an active phase and it could also error out. After activation, it can be in the idle state as if there's no network, it was happening. You can wait for it. In the idle state, it can get terminated or if there's a new fetch happening it gets a callback on fetch also. It's all a different state in which the service worker might box. This was the strategy I was talking about. The page, the network and the cache. What happens and where the service worker sits. This is a picture called representation by shape. So the whole idea is to not to see your users waiting for what's happening. It should be instant and fast. If you want to host here, if you're building for a service worker and you want to host it, if you don't have your domain with HTTPS, if you have a domain, I hope you all have HTTPS to it. If not, please have HTTPS. Maybe Cloudflare or something like that. Or let's enter. I need not talk about why S is important in the HTTPS. If you want to experiment, you can use HTTPS.  If you look at the Clipcard app or any other province in the map, I'll share the list with you. When you add it to your home screen, we saw that in the previous slides. You had an option to add to home screen. So once you add to home screen, you see an idea. So how does that work? It works by listening to what is Manifestation where we mentioned how the icons should look and what is the full name of the app, what is the splash paint color, things like that. So if you're lazy like me, you could use a module I wrote for Manifestation. You could just install Globi and use Manifestation. It will ask you three questions and generate the Manifestation for you. And I would also suggest you to have a look at what application shell is, how it works. It's about how progressively we lower it and this pattern called idle and this is a pattern called rail and this is a pattern called purple. Rail talks about what the response animation idle and load time should be and how you should handle them.  So I would suggest you to have a look at purple. Yeah, now it's running out of time. I try to push for a minute or two. So I want to talk about this push notification but always had notification support, but not really push notification. Native web app developers would always talk about we have this privilege to notify the user even though the app is down we can do push notification and web can't do that and we can add the home screen we have icon standing there on the app and web doesn't have it. So here's a simple demo of push notification. You can just have a look at the enabled push notification there and in this example you just don't get purple so you get push notification there. One thing to notice here is whenever there's an action happening the user gets alert for the first time saying that this site needs to do a push notification. Are you okay with that? And if the user says allow setting and clear it out you can look at all the permissions that's been granted like microphone or camera access and things like that. And background sync is one such event that the service worker handles. In this example we are doing a demo on the chat application here.  I'm on my way or something. But once you get the network and you close the app and once you get the network connectivity the message is being delivered to the other part of it. That's happening from the background sync even though the app is skilled the service worker's idling gets activated and the background sync event has been triggered and then you can do whatever you want. So you have total control on what and how you're requesting within the service worker. So if you want to have scaffold a simple progressive web app I've been working on this with couple of my friends for Generator PWA. It's a human generator. You can install this and just say yo PWA and it will generate scaffold out the basic progressive web app for you. And if you want to check if the website is a progressive web app or not you can just use this tool called East PWA which uses, internally uses a project called Lighthouse from open source from Google which kind of creates the site and sees all the parameters and checks whether it gives a score and based on this score this tool is predicting that whether even you are going to say that or not. And this is a slide I normally use for the questions. You can see me at hteamon.com or tweet me at Newman's and thank you and hold on to just as I promised I need to share you few links So PWA tips is one such website that we are not in public but I thought this is a good place to talk about it. Me and my friend are building this and if you go to CodeLabs PWA tips slash CodeLabs this CodeLabs is very much like in Google CodeLabs but it has all the steps whatever I talk about from the introduction steps we have a basic thing to start with and then we talk about what app shell is and what the protocol is and things like that and talk about service worker how do we instantiate the service worker what are all the life cycles and if you want to see all the lists of PWS you can just Google for awesome PWA and you land here into this repo where you have all the apps, different apps I think I need to show this app and there is articles and videos and slides and what not if you find something interesting or if you find something is missing please send it to me that is one of our progressive app which you can use to annoy your co-workers that is good by what and have fun. Thank you guys guys are building a progressive app and if you are facing any problems you can just tweet at me and there are a few folks of my Google developer experts on there and I will see if that will help you on resolving your issues Do you have time for questions? I was looking at Flipkart today and it seems like the live version is only on mobile so what is with that so is this not for desktop or is it only for mobile? Next stop they are rebuilding the entire stack they are there in Bangalore they said they have a new strategy for next stop I hope not like this only for mobile and that is a very good question the thing is it works on Android Chrome and Android Firefox or Android Opera Flipkart also works for Android Chrome iOS but normal progressive apps wouldn't work for Chrome iOS Any idea why is that? Because it doesn't run Chrome on iOS Exactly So the base is Chrome and the base is more of Safari So if you guys want to see if your iOS users how many? You guys are really missing the privilege of using progressive apps and if you would love it and if you want to use it tweet at Apple, tweet at Safari guys ask them for service orders So my question is will desktop have service workers will it be the same as or will there be two different sides? It should be the same so service worker is not just about offline and I want to say it again it's not just about offline but it's about performance also So if you have a desktop application and if you use your service worker for the second time when the user hits the site you could serve things from cash and it would be really fast Doesn't the browser do that by default? So if say I make an input request for a video alright and if I have cast it already in my service worker I make it all to that video again I could save that But that should be in your cash already No it won't be because it goes through my service worker and my service worker knows that I have cast this video So for every response you could inspect the response inspect the request URL and see whether it's there in your cash and serve it from there So that's where you could improve the performance It's not just about online experience So from a user experience perspective they need to go to an open browser and they will type in the URL No that's the only one right after which you can add to your home screen and you could use it So if I want to show a quick example here this is one app just like all the JavaScript features So it's on my home screen and I can use it It just behaves like a native app So how do we make the people like you just say go and download this app Is it possible to deliver that link to your home page? Yeah it's like I just go to and then it says add to home screen So I add to home screen and it gets added But people are working on having a place to have kind of thing for progressive web apps That is PWA Rocks Searching for PWA And there's also suggestions on having add to home screen functionality on Google search If the thing you're searching is a progressive web app you could just add to home screen Thank you


Alrighty, let's play this in full Saturday is a day for sleeping and damn it. You will not take that away from me Okay, nice. Okay. Now Saturday is a day for sleeping and damn it. You will not take that away from me Very cool.    You will not take that away from me and even on here got away from me This just seems like a body move and the jaw, but the joy is not quite moving the head enough Take that away from me. Take that away from me. Take that away It's almost like you want to go up to the left a bit.  Not that has to be huge But I just want to see a bit more influence there Okay, no Saturday. Okay. No, sir. I didn't even hear. Okay. No, sir. Okay. No, sir I'm the okay to something and it's gonna be tricky. He's gonna mess this up But a little bit of a little bit of an accident. Okay. Okay. No Saturday, Saturday Saturday. Okay. No Saturday Saturday could work even though it's a bit clean. It's almost like Saturday a little bit of a in there Saturday is a day for sleeping for sleeping and Okay. No Saturday is a day for sleeping and I'm gonna do the lips and clear. I'm just I'm just looking at this here was you mentioned in your email about details and stuff So it's out when you got elbow movements, but it doesn't quite affect anything down there. It feels It's extremely tiny thing, but I feel like even if you have a little bit of movement in that Elbow through the shoulder you want a bit of an adjustment in there. It's tiny, but And especially then sleeping and and many goes and damn it like he tenses up and I would almost have a little bit of Gripping in the fingers just a little bit Or not take that away from me and it's almost like you will not or not Not that you're not sure if you need to let go of the hands So that they're both down So the interest that will be to twins, but there's something about Okay, now Saturday Is a day for sleeping. I buy all of this here, but then damn it. You will not But then you will not this is like he's much more agitated This is kind of a a change in everything and then now it's always seems like that hand is just kind of constrained there and is never moving And almost feel like that it would be more interesting to To try to let go on this and it does end up like that where you know, it could be I mean if this would be already enough enough of an offset or Or out like that. I don't know like something where To me it seems like if you scrub it is always there. It's always kind of it's almost like it's in a cast It's attached to a sling and he can never move his arm So to me it seems like you after this especially and damn it. You will not especially with this very much more agitated where I think there will be good opportunity to do that and let go of that hand. Okay. Now Saturday Okay, now Saturday Saturday On Saturday going back to the lip sync to me the lip sync is the biggest thing that needs some fixing I don't this feels more like a way Saturday And it pops a bit and it's to me This how you pop into this, but then there's nowhere to go Gotta be careful when you go into a big shape and you pop in that shape And there's no extension and then it relax a bit in the muscles You can you over shoot a little bit in your facial shapes and it seems like you lock in this Saturday So Saturday, like you know, it's like day you want to be even arching up on the corners Is a day for sleeping Is a day for sleeping is a day for sleeping Is a day now then again, this might also be my My program is always a bit tricky to judge with the lip sync It always feels like there's a bit of a what it's like off by one frame is a day for sleeping But more than that a day for sleeping sleep being Hmm, I would this is more like a pouty shape. I would roll those shapes in for sleeping And sleep and then sleeping I will bring out those corners sleeping for sleeping sleeping for sleeping Hold on. Let me scrub here It's tricky, but if you scrub it's totally late So, I don't know. I don't know if that actually makes it worse. I don't think it's you It's a lot of times just the program is a bit weird. It's a day for sleeping sleeping even on but even on sleeping I would Sleeping I would still go out a bit more. You actually your sleep is earlier day for sleep day for sleep pain Sleeper. I don't know. I would still go out a bit more um sleeping and dammit It's cool to have the contrast there. What I don't know It just it also feels pretty exaggerated and then it's this weird thing of This gets pulled down and this gets pulled up. I would make that a bit simpler So to me on this out, I would again put a bit further in your corners And then get into this but you go from a regular shape to this and I wouldn't go So separate on both here and dammit you won't and then it doesn't feel like dammit And dammit and dammit I could go to me it seems like you go straight into a Mmm, but it's not it's on a it's more like an Not that it's an f but it's it's kind of it's a weird biting of the lower lip To me it seems like you want to do almost less of this a bit more of the top lip roll in and reducing your Chin and I'm not sure what you're doing here And dammit you want to me feels more and dammit you and No, I know I don't I don't read and dammit and dammit you want dammit you Especially if I if I play it again, this could be the the player that's funky, but dammit Around here. It's a dammit and a again corners out and this is a this weird thing of the o shape You will not take that away from me Not I take that away from not take that away Again away from me Away from me. I feel like much more extension out on the corners not take that away from me And that also seems a bit high there on the shapes more like this seems like he's chewing something take that away from me And I'm not talking much just a little bit of reducing how high that that shape goes and how much you curl in there Take that away from me Take that away from me But going back this definitely needs some more head accents and I will probably also add something more in his eyes They seem to kind of die towards the ends Other than that he looks pretty high up, which is very never know how tall the other person is but That's okay. They don't wonder. I think the eye contact is there. Okay. Now saturday Is a day for sleeping and sleeping watch out. There's a bit of a Of a drift on that that wrist rotates down sleeping right there I'm not sure if you if you have an ik arm It seems like it as this shoulder or this elbow goes down This kind of stays put but goes then up a bit and then the wrist goes down just a little bit of an ik feel there Right through there And to me it feels like sleeping and he has the tension up to me You want to bring keep that wrist up and I wouldn't drop it here I would just drop it on and And damn it's kind of like this anticipation before the tensing or you bring it back up a bit You will not take that away from me. Okay. Now saturday Is a day for cool stuff though in the hips and this and the steps. Okay.  I'm talking minimal I don't want this whole block to go up and down But it would be interesting to feel a little bit whatever accents you add in here and attention goes down It's a little bit in here as well for me. Okay now saturday Is a day for sleeping and damn it you will not take that away from me It's a great line though. It's very cool great character. The setup is great. It's really cool. It's being super picky Just because you are mentioning that in your email. You want some picky notes, but I'm gonna leave it at that Let me know email me. Let me know your thoughts and what you think about that. All right. Thank you All right, there's an email you can sign up you can start whenever you want you can submit whatever you want You get 16 submissions either way a like and subscribe would be awesome. All right. Thank you


Will you be in health and human services exploration? Are you interested in curing diseases, working with others to find solutions, and improving people's lives and health? Are you intrigued by medical mysteries and the anatomy of the body? Do you enjoy fitness and teaching others about how to be healthy? Are you considering pre-professional programs in medicine but don't know what your undergraduate major should be? If so, you should look into health and human services exploration. This meta-major explores majors such as anthropology, nursing, microbiology, public health, dental hygiene, dietetics, and medical lab sciences. Students in these majors graduate to become researchers, immunologists, health educators, clinical systems directors, and counselors, social workers, and doctors. If you're interested in health and helping others, it's time to ask, will you be in health and human services exploration?