You did it already. You like the cold weather? I like cold. I like cold. It's always so sunny that sometimes it's nice to have a little bit of rain or a little bit of dark clouds sometimes, right? So how's everyone today? Everyone's good? It's Thursday, tomorrow's Friday. So we feel good? That's all. What? That's all. That's all? That's all. That's all. That's all, folks. Right? That's all. German apart. So last night I was showing my girlfriend this video I had to do for college. And my professor made me learn to juggle. He made me learn to juggle. So that's something that I can do. I can juggle. Something interesting, right? Can anyone in here juggle? Has anyone ever tried? No? So that's something interesting, right? That not many people can do, right? So I was thinking, why don't we try to think of something that you can do that you think is the most interesting thing that you can do or that you have been able to do since the certain age, right? So my example was juggling, right? I can juggle. I have been able to juggle for about eight years now. But it can be anything, something that you can do that maybe you think is rare and something interesting. Give us something interesting, right? So why don't we take a minute to think about it. Take a minute to think about it. And we'll discuss it. Any ideas? Something weird we can do. Something you can do. Is there anything you can do that you find interesting? I can't write. You can what? Write. I can't write a card. You can. I can't. Can in America. That's interesting. But most people can drive, right? Can you guys drive? Yes. Can you think of anything else that you're able to do, maybe? I can't live to come home. Why not? But very good. Very good. Can you say it again one more time? I can't write the camera. Right? I can't write the camera. So tell us about that. Has anyone written a camel? Do you mind telling us about it? The first, it's very difficult. Because it's go like that. And it's go under your pillow.   Sometimes. So anything else? Like you wear a seat? You have to wear a strap or anything? You need to. OK. That's necessary. If you want to wear a jacket. OK. And what about if you have a camel? Yes, I have. So how many do you have? I don't really have a camel. He had a turntag. How much? Each one, $300,000 USD. $300,000. And he had a siren on. And he had a turntag. He had a turntag. What's the $9 million in camera? We're rich, man. Just in camera. A camel? Yeah. Maghateer. Just one name.  Yeah, some of them, like, let's wish a lot, let's wish. Save. What do you use? How do you use the cameras? You make the only or the spare money only we use for everything. The eggs. We can eat, we can drink the milk, we can carry. Congratulations, man. And for the racing? Oh, and what do you do with these cameras? Of these things? Party? Party. You make money or all the spare money? No, spare, then sometimes we serve the camel. And do you bring the meat? Yes, it's very good. And it's very good for the health. The best time, you will have problem. Really? With your stomach. Because it's very strong. OK. Next time, you'll be OK. It has a lot of fat. But then there's like a sauce. Interesting. So you have it in you when you're in Salami drink economy. Yeah. How many times per day do you have people like your name? Once a month or a day? No, maybe once a month. Oh, once a month. It's very good.  Yeah, it's very good. It's good. It takes several, you eat a lot. Yeah, it's very big. Maybe one? Maybe one every two months. Yeah. And you give water to eat? What do you do? Sit like grass and water. OK. So he can ride camel, he can drink camel milk? Yeah. He can eat camel milk. And you bet able to do this for how long? The riding? I lived for two years. Two years? Yeah. So that was a good one. Do you eat grazing with that? Yeah. Really? Is it dangerous? No, no. No? No. Do you have a seat?  And then you have the... They're very tall. No, no. Not too much. Not too much. But there is like a statement. Very good. So that was something that he can do that I would find rare, right? None of us have done that. So do we have any other ideas? Anything else? Anything interesting you maybe learned as a child or recently? No? OK. So I like the camel that was very, very good, the camel example. That was a rare thing. That's something that he can do, something that he was able to do, right? Something very rare that we don't do in many countries, right? Is that popular anywhere else? No? I've actually never really... I don't know if I've ever even seen a camel, actually. Has everyone here seen a camel? No. You've seen it? Yes. My name wasn't there. I was in Dubai and they let me clean for it. But it wasn't there. It was a ballistic... Zoom. I was very worried. Why were you worried? Because it's very huge. It moves like this. Like what? You sit and it moves like this. Oh, place it down. The movement. The most interesting thing is that you're pulling down easily. So that was something that he can do, something that he was able to do. Very good example that he was sharing then. I can do the juggling. I'll do that for you one day.  So, I wrote a sentence here. They blank wait because they were in a hurry. Can you guys think of what might be in that blank then? The calendar. They can't wait because... But, now look at this word here. Right? So that's past, right? No. So it wouldn't be can't. Close. Very close. Couldn't, right? Couldn't. Very good. Couldn't, right? Have we seen that before? Yeah? Couldn't. Was that on the recent test that you took? No, just the recent of today. The one? The recent of today. Oh, okay. Shoot down, shoot down. Today? Yeah. That was another one that you did recently. Okay. What are these called? Do we know what these are called? Model verbs. Model verbs. Very good. Model verbs. Have duals on it. Have duals on it. He knows. He knows. So what do we use model verbs for? For what? Model verbs. Okay. We use them for what else? For when you're not sure. So we can use... Well, the model verbs are used for forming tenses or moves or voices. They can express necessity, possibility. Can you give me examples of model verbs? Hypothetical situation. Hypothetical situation? Right. Yes, exactly. Yes. Very good. Can we think of any examples of model verbs? Other ones than this? Should, right? What? What? What? What? So we have should, what? What are the other ones? Most. All of them.  Ought to. Okay. Oughts. That's another one. Any other ones? What is the present form of the... Can. Can. Can. Can. May must. May must. Very good. Quite. So we've seen these. Good. We've seen these before. So do we know the rules like for can and could? How about can? So we say can is what tense? What tense is can? Is it simple? No? Isn't simple. Very good. Can, so we use can with the present simple. So that's why here we didn't use that because of the word, right? What about... So that's very good. So what about the able to? When can we use able to? You know, but you can use the can for present form, right? But you can also use it for... So the past or the conditional, we went over, right? Is the couldn't? Could? That's the past, right? Can you use it as a conditional before I move on to able to? Like a... Could. How would you use that in a conditional sentence? It could be weight. They could... Be weighting? Be weighting? They could be weighting? Okay. So you could be weighting for... What? Ten minutes? Yeah. Could be weighting for... One day. One day, right? So one day. So anything from there to there? You could be weighting? You're saying? So it's a possibility? Okay, very good. And what about able to? So when do we use able to? When we can do something? Okay. In what tense would we use it? Are you able to swim? Okay. Are you able to swim? And so we would be talking about the... We'll come use it in another tense that we would be talking about. Are you able to speak English? Are you able to speak English? What about the future? Can we use that in the future? Future. Future. We'll be able. We'll be able. So in the sentence... In the sentence, maybe... Maybe a question. In six months, I will be able to speak English. In six months, I will be able to speak English. Is that a true sentence? No. I may. May. Maybe. Maybe. All the way. So I will be able to, right? I suppose to speak English. Suppose to. So you could say you will be able to practice English in the United States. So it would be like the future tense. So we would use that for the future. So we've seen this before, right? All right. Do you guys seem pretty comfortable with that? I brought in this communication exercise. That we could do. And so what it does is it lists off sentences and beliefs using can, could and be able to, right? So these are possibilities. These are things that we can do, right? Things that we can do. And so what it does is it lists it off and you read it and then you say if you agree or you disagree. So the first one is to be able to speak English well, you have to live in an English speaking country for at least one year. So you can write, you can put an X if you agree or you can put an A if you would like and a D if you disagree. So if you wouldn't mind just going through, writing an A or a D on each one. And then at the, and then after you finish we can talk about, we agree or we disagree with the whole class because some of these I think we'll have different opinions on. Here you go. We'll give it another two minutes and then we will see what everyone thinks. So let's look into these. So again, remember these are abilities or possibilities using can, could or be able to, right? Because that's what they show, an ability or a possibility, right? So Anna, would you mind reading one? To be able to speak English well you have to live in an English speaking country for at least one year. So what do you think? Do you agree or disagree? I disagree. Disagree? I think it depends on how we work on it. You can also do the language in six months. Maybe you have to work at home with watching movies or watching video reading books. Okay. Listening maybe one year instead. Too much? Yeah. Okay. Does anyone else have that? It depends. If you start from zero maybe you'll finish one year. If you start from a basic level I can start from six months. Six months? And then you have to work with the movie. It's never a moment of laughing about the language for one year. Good. That's really good. I think we'll start from in some sense. Okay. Does everyone agree with that? Do we have anyone that thinks differently or do everyone have the same idea? Vincent Zavance? Yeah. I disagree. Okay. Same thing? Yeah. Okay. All right. So let's move on to the next one. Vince, would you mind agreeing to you there? I'd prefer you more opportunities if you can speak English well. I agree. Agreed? Yeah. And why? Because now a lot of companies are international and it depends on your job. If you want to control or value the world in the market. Okay. I agree. Does everyone agree? Yeah. Any other additional reasons and same thoughts? So there is a global company. It's the most important company. It's a global company. And if you can speak in English, you are able to talk to the manager, the director, the CEO. If you can't speak any or understand nothing, you are going to have a chance. They always, maybe in Brazil, have a lot of needs or important person in English. If you can't understand nothing, if you're not... Okay. Or if you want to speak. And if you can understand and can speak a little bit, some of them. Okay. So we think that if you can speak English well, then there are more opportunities, right? So we see the word can there. So you have the ability to speak English, right? What about... Salon, what did you think of three? Or would you mind reading that, too? I'm not reading. I'm not reading. And would you mind reading it? It's never too late to be able to learn a new language. Okay. Does everyone agree? And why do we agree with that? Because if you want to learn... You don't mind reading it? To learn... Oh, things. It's never late, but when you are there... When you are there, it's late. Okay. So it's definitely safe. But I'm not sure... philosophical. This works. Because the sentence is to be able to learn a new language. If you are 70 years old, I don't know if you are in the same way able to learn a new language. No, I'd seek me any but... More difficult than you... More difficult. More younger. More... More difficult than you... There's a will, okay? And maybe you can learn a language, but not as well as when you were a threat guest. In the same way, it doesn't work anymore. Of course, more difficult. Yes. But... I took both. I agree. Yes. Because if you want to learn a language, you can make it this eight years or this hundred years. Sure. But not in the same way as with 20 years. But if you really want it or even move it... But we are talking about learning a language. Yes. And once they are younger, if you are, it's more easy, it's more possibility. Less time or spend less money. Very good point. So you highlighted the be able to, right? Yes. So that was the point there, be able to. And I can see her point, like you said, right? Maybe when you get older, it's harder to be able to. Good point. Abdul, would you mind reading the next one? My main reason for learning English is because I want to be able to get a good job. Okay. I disagree. You disagree? Yes. I don't know. Because now the English is... I don't know how to speak English. Okay. Good. So we will... I'm going to talk about that a little later, too. So that was a very good point. Very good point. You are busy with this? And you want to be a pilot? Yes. No, only job. Yes. You are busy with this? Yes. Because you don't know every way. Because you can't talk? If you don't have English. Very good. What about the next one there? Julian? It doesn't matter if you make mistakes in English, it's because if people are able to understand you... Yes, I agree. I agree. I agree. Because you learn the language... I don't speak. If you speak and if you try and if you don't... It's more easy to speak for other foreigners. Yes, yes. If you want to go to Germany, I speak in English, and German people, you can't understand me more. More than Americans. Wow. It depends on the whole formal, the moment you go interview or for a job. Yes. You need to? Yes. You don't need to? Yes. You don't have a mistake? Yes. But if you travel or speak for someone for another foreign, it's more easy to understand. Yes. Okay. So, you serve a very good point. For me... Please. So, you want people to understand you, right? But if you go to a job or something, then they will highlight or point out the mistakes that you made. Is that what you're saying? Good. What about Luciano and Marco? Would you mind reading the next one? Luciano? There's not much you can to improve your English outside the classroom. I disagree. I disagree. You disagree? Yes. I have a lot of websites to help you. Movies? Yes. Movies. To music? Yes. Okay. So, you disagree? Yes. Okay. Does everyone think the same? Yes. You agree with that? Okay. What about the next one? The Julian? Too much should always be able to say some basic phrases in the language of the country there. I agree. I agree. Because of the kind of mistakes I show the people of the country under them. It's always better if you can say hello. Thank you. How are you? Yes. Talk a little bit and to learn a little bit of the culture of the country. Some are polite in phrases or something. But thank you. How are you? The native. How do you say hello here? How do you say hello? Good. Hello. Hello. Easy. Just hello. Good. Remember that one. Good. Good. Good. Okay. So, let's stick to English, right? So, does everyone agree with that? Disagree. You disagree? Yes. I was in Spain and I can't speak Spanish. Yes. I know why you speak Spanish. But wouldn't it be better if you could speak Spanish? If you could say hola, guitar. No. I spoke only in English. Okay. What God? How many of you go to the champagne. Before you travel into the book, just speak for five minutes, no? That's every language you have. So, what do we think of the next one there? So what about, what about the next one there, Anna? What? I thought you were being 100% being... I think it's true. You think it's true? Yeah. And why? 100% language that we assume when you are born there. It's very, very, very difficult to be. But 100% being... I think it's sweet. You disagree? Yes. You can speak two languages. For example, my daughter is a cousin. She was born here. And she speaks perfectly in French. Okay. Because she wants to be in French. She speaks with her mother in Spanish. And of course, especially if she speaks English. Okay. Let's speak Italian. Let's speak Italian. It's cool. Let's speak French with the Italian. But they are speaking English. But it is not the language. Even if they speak 10 years. For example, you learn better and better. Brazilian. Very good English. Maybe she lost some words in Portuguese, I think. So we think, so when we say, we disagree. We would say we can't. We would say it's impossible. You disagree? I disagree here. I can't never. Can't never? Right, can't never. That's why I wanted to point that out, right? So you understand this as can never, right? Okay. Okay. So we say a person can never, right? So that would be the opposite, right? What about the next one there? Abdul. Most people prepare to see a foreign movie. For the film, with subtitles. They'll see it deep. To their own language. Now they watch it in English. And then in English subtitles. Okay. I don't understand. Okay. You don't understand these, what? Okay. So you are Southern Indian, right? You prefer soft films. They feel nicer in English than in Arabic. Of course. Because you are studying English. You'll never want or need to study. You'll stay at home. You're living there. I see the novel. Very good. I like to see it from time to time. I didn't come here. Okay. I'm prepared. Does everyone agree with that? You disagree? I prefer my language more easily. I prefer my own language. Okay. I prefer my language and put W in English or whatever language. Okay. Very good. What about the next one there, Sylvan? What does that say there? Time? It can help you when you learn English. It's true. I agree. Everyone? Okay. So it can. So then you're saying it's possible to be able to help you? Yeah. Okay. Every fear did. I would have to agree, right? What about the next one there, Anna? Listen to other people speaking English. It's the only way I can improve my pronunciation. No, it's the only way. It's not the only way. You can watch movies. Yeah. You can listen to music. Yeah. You can make American friends. You can listen to music when you watch TV. You listen to... Some other person. Yeah. I mean, I think listening has to be interesting. Okay. People. Okay. If you mean like that, it's true. We have different thoughts, different opinions there. Because you consider that movie and music is something coming from people. So you're listening to people. Ah, I see it. I was thinking like an attorney. He's Swiss. He has to be precise. So, but that is listening to people through... You can just see the phonetic to understand... Okay. And then what about the next one? What about the next one there, Julia? Most young people in my country communicate well in English. I agree. Agree. Yeah. Everyone? No, I can't. They can't. So you would say the opposite of can, right? Yeah. They can't. Can't? Okay. They can't. And most people you said in Italy cannot? No. Okay. They're going back. Programs. School programs. They're very bad. They just learn new things, new things. Okay. In other countries are you saying they can? Yeah. They can. They can. And they can learn new things. Yeah. So how long was... How long? How long? Yeah. How long? So, two numbers. At what age? Today, very. About... I have a... Mrs. Yes. And I was like... 10 years older. 10 years older. Speak almost the best... So you would say she... So you would say she what? Can could or has been able to? And she... But you would say she... If you said she blank since she was maybe five or six years old. So she can could or be able to? Actually, can. Okay. Well, can would be more present, right? Yeah. So we're talking about the past, right? Or in the future, but you could say she what? Has been... Correct. Right? Has been able to speak English since she was maybe five? What about the difficult point? Depend on the past. Okay. You've just studied for a long time. You're interested at the language part of life. No. Okay. What about the next one there? Abdul? I don't know. I'm trying to understand English just by watching TV and English. That's true. I agree. You agree? I agree. Does everyone agree that that's possible? So if you don't just... Child can learn English just by watching TV in English. No, no, just... Okay. So that's not possible. Yeah. So you would say a child... How would you reword that sentence? A child... Can. Can't, right? Can't, in my English, by just watching TV in English. Very good. What about 14 there of this? I would teach her. You can influence how much you enjoy a language. Yes. I agree. I agree. I agree. We agree? Yes. Yes. Okay. And why do we say that? I would teach her. I think she has to learn easy or fastest. More efficient. Okay. Very good point. Very good point. So they have a lot of... They can, but they aren't able to control that. They influence that. And then the last one there, Hulia. To be able to communicate rather than a formal language pronunciation and to take it over, you're more important than grammar. I disagree. Because you need the grammar to make the sentences right. What do we think? I don't need to know the grammar because you need to know the situation, the tense if you are in the past or the present or the future. If you know who's real about the future, you know who's the better in the past to talk about the past. Maybe the other people don't understand. Yeah. Or... So the question is, to be able to communicate well. Yeah. Maybe it's the band. Maybe here is the vocal. Okay. My opinion. Very good. You can't communicate or just talk at before. If you talk to another foreigner, it's more easy to understand one of them. It's important to know the grammar too. Yeah. Very good. Very good. So... In my case, I never... I studied English when I was a child. And then I never used it to communicate. Okay. I have one out to live in Canada. I have uncles and cousins. And I can't talk to them. And I feel it in bed. My sadness, no. I studied in a child. And I come here sometimes a year. And I go, come on. I don't know English. I can't understand. I can't understand. But I can't speak. And I don't know. I need to study. So would you be able to talk to me? When I arrived here, I... I morphed into grammar. My grammar was zero. And now I stay here for two months. Okay. I'm very proud of my grammar because I grew a lot. I didn't love to take a... I think of my teacher, helped me a lot. Sandy, she's a better teacher. And she writes on the board a lot. And it's very good for me. And I go back to Brazil. Very good. So is there a condition that would be met for you to speak with your family better? My family is at home. So you would say... My friends in Brazil are in another meeting. And it was your aunt or your sister again? What was it, your sister or your aunt? Or my aunt. Your aunt? Yeah, living chemical. Okay. You say aunt or... Um... So that brings up the perfect sentence, right? So you would say, I blank speak English with my aunt if I learned English. If I learned English, right? So this is a condition. The condition is if I learned English, right? So what would you put here? Could, right? Very good. Could. So that's why we can use could as a condition, right? I could speak English with my aunt if I learned English. I can't speak English with her because I don't... I do not know English. Or I did not. So in the past, you would say, you would have said I can't speak English with my aunt because I don't know English. And then you would say, well, I could speak English with my aunt if I learned English, right? And so that's how that works exactly. So one of the last things I wanted to do was I wanted you to think on this topic. I wanted you to think of the two or three most important things in order that you will be able to do that you will be able to do after learning English. To you, what are the three most important... Two or three most important things in order? You can also change your sentence. Like if I had learned English, I might be able to speak with my aunt. But you said had, so that would be... You would have to say I might... If I had learned English, I might have been able to. But you're changing the tense, right? Yeah, exactly. So I want you to think of the... I'm wondering, I want you to think of the two or three most important things that you will be able to do. So again, that's the future, right? After learning English, is it? So I'll give you an example. Maybe it is I will be able to get a better job. I will be able to make more friends. I will be able to travel. I will be... So like those types of examples, what will you be able to do after learning English? Because you learned English. So I'll give you just a few minutes, just two or three minutes, maybe three or four minutes to think about that. So let's go over the examples that you guys had there. For the two or three most important things after you learned English language. So what did you guys have? A good job. A prize for many children. And myself. So travel, good job, and yourself? In that order? Travel, good job, and yourself? Good job is the first. Good job is the first? For traveling. For traveling? Yeah. Okay. For communication. Okay, so you can get a good job, you can travel, you can talk to people, so you want to be able to... You want to be able to, right? So without that, would you say that you can't? Without English language? Yes, I can. Okay. What other things do we have in the same? Yeah. But I can... I can myself, but you're always taking me to the fish. But I never go up, I think. Okay. Any other ideas? Traveling, talking with foreign people. Getting new jobs? Okay. So the same... So we all have the same ideas. We want to be able to get a good job, travel, and talk to people. I would say. Okay, good. So we want to be able to do that. And after we learn, we can do that, right? Good. All right. So today we went over Ken, we went over Be Able To, we went over Could, and those show what? What do they show? Possibility, and opportunities. And abilities. Very good. All right, guys. So that will be the end of the class today. I think everyone did very well. Thank you guys. And again, I will see you tomorrow. I will see you tomorrow. Have a good day.


Natural resources. I'll start again. Hello, everybody, and welcome to The O'Neal DNA Project. And today we're going to talk about the developments of The O'Neal DNA Project. My name's Sean O'Neal. I'm one of the administrators of The O'Neal DNA Project and we have two other members of the administration group, Fred Mulholland and Dwayne O'Neal. And we also have Ed O'Neal who didn't travel and we, we'd like to thank i'w wneud yw'r gwaith o'r eu cyfnod. Edd was y tyfio'r ffondor yma o'r dynnill yma yw'r dynnill. Mae'n cael eu papur ar y dynnu'r Gweithgaredd, ar gyfer ddechrau'r dynnu, yn ddynnill o'r dynnill o'r dynnu a'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dyfnod. Mae'n cael eu dynnu i'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dynnu'r dyfnod. Fredd a myself joined the project a few years later and that progressed very well and this is followed on by Dwayne, who followed a few years later. Coincidentally, all four of us are engineers, which is something. So the four of us coordinate the project and what we try to do is match up the genealogy of the One Eels with the DNA that we find. And we try and encourage people to select the correct tests so that we can match the DNA to the genealogy. And we try and focus in on new DNA tests as they become available. So just move on. So at the moment we have 645 members in total in the project. 480 of those kits have Y DNA tested, 170 of those to Y 111, 90 to Big Y and 10 kits were still waiting Big Y results. The development of Big Y has been a very significant step for the DNA project and Dwayne and Fredd will talk in detail about that. The remaining kits have also done Family Finder and MT DNA tests, so that's all good. So I think without further ado I'm going to introduce Fredd and he's going to talk to us about the first part of the project. And I'd like to welcome everybody who travelled from America and from Canada, so far it's all yours. Thanks. Well, with luck this thing's going to stay around. Let's see. When Edd started he did have a good starting point better than most of the other projects did. We had genealogy, I call it the barge recitation of the kings of England which led us to have these lines here. You can see the Herman line, the Herbryd line. There were four very distinct groups of O'Neill, each one had an O'Neill founder, the namesake. So they were all related way back, but then they were distinct. So that was a very good thing for Trinity College to work with. Can we actually break out these four groups of O'Neill to say they're different? And they actually came up with a signature, and this was when they only had 37 STRs. They were saying each of the O'Neill's, this is what they are. Now also as part of this, the most famous person within the line of kings that people knew was O'Neill of the Nine Hossages, O'Neill Nile Nar. And so they looked at that and he says, well, if you need to have the SNP M22 to be related to him. Now M22 is older than him, so some of his cousins would also have that. So it doesn't necessarily mean you're absolutely descended from him. But if you don't have it, that means you're absolutely not part of that descended. And the other thing they discovered when they looked at all the O'Neill's and they did that, is group that didn't match anything at all. But they're all up in Ulster, close knit group, didn't match anyone. So they did have to work with that and figure out what that was. Now he talked about the paper that Ed worked on and published about 2005. In that paper he says, let's call this just O'Neill variety, just so we have a way to reference it. So that's that unknown group. Now when you look at the YDNA and you look at the poplo trees that are coming down from R, when you come down six levels, you get down to the M269. M269 is what today Family Tree DNA will give you when you do your very first DNA test. If you're going to be part of these lines, you're going to have the M269. There are, in the group, there are some that are actually, they're not R, they're I. There are some that are not M269, they're another branch. But these are the ones of these four lines all fit under the M269. And then you can go down further.  There are approximately 77,000 people that have done and became M269. Of those, about 15,000 have done nothing else. They're just stuck there. They have not done any further testing. So that's where it would be good to get a little further testing, move down the tree. Now all of these groups, again, are down the tree and other five levels to the P312. So again you're just coming down closer in time. And that one, if you go over to the big tree, they actually have dates on there. And they put on a date of their 2675 BC. But you actually have come down in time closer to the present. P312 is where things split off the first time. That's where this O'Neill variety goes one direction. Everything else comes its own way. And they call the first branch they have is the Z290. Then it goes down and gets up with DF13. And that, in the meantime, to the common ancestor, you're at 2145 BC. You really came a lot. But that's where then everything starts breaking down into what are these four groups that were part of the original genealogy. Now, again, the dates are from the big tree. They have a way of calculating dates. But dates you have to take with plus or minus 25%. So although it gives a date here, that's approximate. You can't be those are not hard dates that you can set in stone. So this actually does kind of match up with the bargery citations a bit. If you think about about a 1690 or so. Now, as an American, I can never pronounce that name so I'm not even going to try. But that's your first branch. And again, these snips, all the snips have a name. And the first letters say who came up with it. And then they just number them so that they make no sense whatsoever but they're there. So that branch, then the unil branch goes down another way. And then what you didn't particularly expect was the Thoman and Leistor come together one level down before they branch. And that's not really what was expected. But that's the way it has ended up going. Now, within the project, we break it into groups. And the first group we had there was one A, the unil. And in there, what happens when they say it's an M2222, that's actually a block of 15 snips that happened we all assume sequentially. And if you look at those and say, well, how long did it take to get those mutations? It's about 2,000 years. So you have about 2,000 years where there's no branches. This just goes from one point down to the other. Now you're 140 BC. And again, this is before Nile of the Nine Hossages. And naturally, this is at this time. And at his time, you're still well before surnames. Now in doing the big Y test, we had this large group. And it appeared also everyone was going to be what's called a DF105109. That's because Family Tree DNA uses one number. The Big Tree uses the other number. So you put both down there. So that way you'll be able to find it. That brought us forward to about 390. I think there were only two that did big Y within the large group of the M222, which did not follow this path. And so they're still sitting there at the M222 level. Now in looking at the DF105109, all of a sudden you look at them, more people did the big Y, more did the big Y. Half of them fell into this other SNP. So we broke that out and put it out separate. And so we formed 1A1A. Therefore you can say it's branching down. But that's one of them. We have the other people left in there. And there's five different SNPs where they could come down. So you've got six branches there. I've only identified one. The others have one, maybe two there. So we're still trying to build up enough people to say there's enough to really have a branch. One of the things I hate is to look at here, and here is a branch with one person. I don't like those, so I try to avoid those totally. So make sure that there's a couple of people in there. The other thing we found here is that if you look at a person who's in this group, and we go to his page and say, well, how many matches does he have, and then how many are in the O'Neill project, two to 15% are in the O'Neill project. So there's a lot of people that just haven't bothered or joined the O'Neill project, which could help identify and tie this together closer. Particularly if anyone has done a big Y, you need to try and get those that have done a big Y grouped together in the same project, and preferably the O'Neill project. This just shows essentially what I was saying, where things happened. You'll notice under the 39, 589, they're on the left, I got a slash. That means there are some branches before you get down to M222. Under that, I have number of people. And again at M222, you're before surnames. So in 1A, there's 63 people of those. 39 or O'Neill are some variant of that. We broke out the 1A1, there's 24 people, only four are the O'Neill. 1A1A, there's 14, there's only three. So this is not necessarily the best branch for the O'Neill surname. It turns out, as I said, there were six branches, this is one. This is not the branch with the most snips underneath it, there's another one. But right now within our group, there isn't enough really to break out another group. But if you look at the FGC triple 134, there's only 20 in there, but 19 of them are O'Neill. So this is a group where the O'Neills are joining if they're in that group and going in there. But again, it's only 2-15% of the people that have that snip. Then I show we got the breakout of the Thoman and the Leinster. And when I put, it's like a 1D, a 1L, that is the group. If you go to the O'Neill project, you look at the groups, that's the group. Now as they've been doing the big Y, and I look at that and say, well, I probably need to move some people back and forth. The 1D is the one that was identified at first, that is going to be Thoman. But with that same snip change, there was another group whose STRs didn't quite match, which is why we have a 1L. So the STRs don't quite match, but they both come down the same snip tree. But you're quite far back in time. So it's hard to say. You're still around 1600 BC. So you could have some changes there. And then we have the Leinster, which again, here we have 15, with a surname of O'Neill or their variant out of 22 in the group. L513 is a couple of groups there because their STRs don't look the same. And we don't really know what that group is. What are they? They're just unknown. They have shown up. They're in here. But again, there are some with the name O'Neill, but they don't seem to fit these categories that were created. DF21, there's the COLA. Now the three COLAs were assumed initially to be part of the M222, but they are not. And the COLAs have their own website that goes in the whole thing and explains where they came from and the fact that they came over to Ireland later and they were not part of the original group that came over. And we only have two in there. Glen of Ahelo, that was a group that sort of self-identifies as we want to do this. They do show up separately, if you look at the DNA. Interestingly enough, the one down at 3G at the very bottom, turns out he should be moved up there because he's done the big Y, it shows that he matches back into that group so we can move him back up there. And there's 3E. We just don't know what it is. Where'd he come from? Now we're going to talk a little bit about O'Neill variety and then I'm going to hand it over to Dwayne to go into the gory details about this. But the real question was, where does this sit on the hopla tree? And a number of people, including me, were very frustrated for many years because we're stuck at 312. No SNP below 312 until he got big Y. Then they started doing things and they came up with the DF-27, was identified, now we can have a branch. After a while, they came up with the pH 2047. Hey, there's a branch under that. Then they came up with the Z1513. This group is Z1513. Everyone in the group will be that, although many of them still are stuck at M269. If they test, they will come down to Z1513. Okay, so here's a group. What are they? Well, it turns out that they replaced the Tyrone O'Neill line. That if you start looking, coming down the line of the kings of the O'Neill, who's in charge, who's the lead, the O'Neill, all of a sudden it switches over and becomes the Z1513. So if you look at this group, and this happened before the Clannaboy's split, so you got the Clannaboys, you got the Tyrone, you got the Fused and the Exchange, all fall into this category. So this is after the O'Neill name was in place. We have some O'Neill name M222, and then all of a sudden this one takes over. Where it came from, we don't know. One of the things is, this is another one where there's a block of 25 snips, and there's no branches. So you're going back 3,000 years. Where has it been for those 3,000 years? We don't know. Now I put on some guesses here. Scotland is Spain for two reasons. One is, my assumption has been, which is good as anybody else's assumption or is bad, that they brought in warriors to help the Irish into fighting the war. If they brought over, typically they would come maybe from Scotland. The reason I have Spain there is double because Spain and the Irish worked together fighting against English. And if you look at the DF-27 project, there's a lot of arguments about the origin of that, and there's a large group that says, my God it is the Spask in Spain, up in northern Spain. So it could be. My assumption is, which is pure assumption, is that they had this people come over there helping to fight. One of them was a very natural known good leader, good fighter, marry him off to a daughter. He's got a foreign name, change it to O'Neill. Two generations later it's all O'Neill's. But that's a company that might have happened. You just don't know, and we probably never will know. But I like that one. And now I think it's time for Dwayne to get into the gory details. Thanks, Ryan. Get the focus of my portion of this presentation will be on the O'Neill variety group. And the O'Neill variety is associated with, as Fred mentioned, half a group Z1513, which is downstream of P312 and DF-27. The O'Neill variety groups are 1B and 1B1 and the O'Neill surname project with about 117 members in total. The main group of about 29 members is negative for the downstream SNP BY3292. The BY3292 positive subgroup has about 24 members. In addition, there is about 64 members that are very likely said 1513 positive, but may or may not be positive for BY3292 since they've only tested to 67 or fewer SDR markers. This is a slide of the big tree for Z1513. About 25 kits so far have upgraded to big Y and this is currently the Z1513 clade representation on the big tree. The Z1513 SNP block, as Fred mentioned, also named FGC 49734 on the big tree, has about 25 SNPs. That's shown right there. Oops, I hit the wrong, there we go. At present there's four subbranches including BY3292. I'm good to that second time. We just show them there. Then another branch, BY32400. Then a larger branch, BY3127, I'm sorry, this is BY32400. Then a third branch, this is BY31270. I'm going to practice this. Then there's a fourth unnamed branch here. A niche analysis for the most recent common ancestor of Z1513 was completed and it was done based upon taking the average of the unmatched variance plus the name SNPs for all the kits and using a range of 100 to 144 years on average per SNP. The most recent common ancestor estimate for Z1513 was 832... OK. Thanks, Morris. The age analysis for the most recent common ancestor for Z1513 is 830 to 1170 AD. Then using a similar approach for the most recent common ancestor estimate for BY3292, that would be right in here, would be 1250 to 1465 AD. This is another representation of the Z1513 big Y kits. 14 kits have completed big Y testing for this quad that are BY3292 negative with results from another three kits expected soon. Most of the kits have an O'Neill related surname with some of the kits specifically identified from the fuse and the McShane branches. Note that the eight big Y kits under BY32400 is once in here. OK, don't have any SNPs to identify potential subbranches. One would expect that one or more SNPs for each of these potential branches since SNP variants occur on average, as it mentioned, every 100 to 144 years. It appears that for about a 300 year period no SNP mutations occurred resulting in each of the potential BY32400 subbranches not being identified by SNPs. Not shown on the slide are additional 12 kits that are part of this group based upon signature STR markers. Both the big Y and the STR kits are shown on this slide with some signature STRs at it. The first signature STR is DYS435 which is highlighted in green near the top. This one here. The modal value is 12, but it mutates to a value of 11 for the BY3292 branch which is shown on the right. Next STR DYS534 in general has a value of 14 for the two leftmost subbranches rather than the value of 15. The DYS449 in general appears to differentiate the center branch from the two on the right. Finally DYS715 values appear to differentiate the two leftmost branches. So, in essence here, we're using a combination of SNPs and STRs to put in the overall form of branching for Z1513. Now, this here is a slide shows a very simplified version of the traditional genealogy for the Tyrone McShane fuse branch.  Lazy Youth is here and so then there is the branch here for the Tyrone fuse McShane and the second branch for the Clannaboys. You may recall that the Z1513 most recent common ancestor was estimated to be around 830 to 1170 AD which would have been prior to these two branches forming. And you also may recall that the BY3292 most recent common ancestor was estimated to be around 1250 to 1465 AD which is more recent than the two branches forming. Some of the Z1513 kits that are BY32 negative have also been associated with the fuse and McShane branches. Next we'll look at the BY3292 positive plate with 24 kits as shown in subgroup 1B in the O'Neill project. This is the O'Neill project listing for 1B1 and then as shown on the right are most of the BY kit, big wide kits on the big tree. So this next view combines the big wide results with STR and SNP results. So I'm not expecting you to take this all in at once. So what I'm doing is doing going to do three slides over next to how it builds up to this one here. So it will build up by overlying big wide results with signature STR results and finally specific SNP results. This slide shows the 11 BY3292 big wide kits and the likely position of the three kits with big wide test results pending and those kits are indicated by the yellow and green box colouring. So we're expecting within the next few weeks to get results from these three kits and we're expecting them to maybe form subbranches as a possibility. So there's three branches. One of the branches in the center has two subbranches and the third branch, which on the right may have three subbranches. It's likely that the leftmost branch which will form one or more subbranches when the latest big wide results come in. Note that the big wide kits have on average only 2.5 unmatched variants with some kits only have one unnamed variant. All these kits then have common ancestors that are within the range of traditional or genealogy research from the late 1700s. As you might recall that SNPs on average develop every 100 to 144 years. Here's a summary with all the 24 BY3292 kits and you might recall that all the Z1513 kits that have tested positive for BY3292 have a value of 11 for STR-DYS 435. Let's state it right there. And so that's how we've been able to identify that all these kits are likely BY3292 positive through the STR number 111. Kits that have tested to 111 STR markers all have value 11 and been added to this year. And the ones that have just done STR markers are highly played with the yellow background. Another STR-DYS 710 is highlighted by the yellow line. In general, DYS 710 has a value of 35 for the Latinose branch being BY31266. And the value of 34 or 33 for the two rightmost branches. In addition, there appears to be specific STRs whose values are associated with some of the BY3292 subbranches. So in using these signature STRs we've been able to then using the signature STR marker values we've been able to serve all the BY3292 identified kits we tested for specific SNPs related to a branch based upon the signature STRs. The kits that complete and confirm positive for a specific SNP are highlighted in a teal collar. These ones down here, they just tested for a specific BY31266 SNP and they were positive, certainly with these kits here. That leads us back to the slide that we saw three back. And as indicated, but half of the kits have identified their ancestor with an O'Neill family surname and the other kits have identified their ancestor with another family name. Just less than half of the kits have identified their ancestors of being born in Ulster. Five of the kits are associated with County Antrim. Three are from County Tyrone and another kit from County Dairy. Most of the other kits have identified the United States as their ancestor's location. One of the kits in FGC 3726 in this area here has their ancestor connected to Feilmbach O'Neill who died in 1533 and is the ancestor of the O'Neill's of Eden Duff Castle. The three kits with ancestors identified from County Tyrone are all from the leftmost branch, BY31266. County Tyrone is typically considered the traditional territory of the Tyrone O'Neill's so further investigation is required to reconcile how the BY31266 and other BY3292 branches are related through genealogical research. This here as a slide shows a very simplified version of the traditional genealogy of the Conaboy branch.  You may recall that said 1513's most recent common ancestor was estimated to be 830 to 1170 AD which would have been prior to these two branches forming and also as I mentioned before BY3292's most recent common ancestor was estimated to be around 1250 to 1465 AD which is more recent than the ancestor of the Conaboy's Hugh the Bones ring. So the estimate for BY3292H is in around Hugh the Bones. So various Conaboy's seps are highlighted on the slide so these are just some of the ones that have been identified through traditional genealogy. This here is still a simplified version of some of the Conaboy's seps from the 15th century onward so it includes the O'Neill's of Lisbon and the O'Neill's of Eddinduff Castle which is called Shane's Castle now in the past few hundred years and the O'Neill's of the Dommel of the Braid and then even more recent than that are some other seps of the Conaboy O'Neill's as indicated here. So we'd like to identify the Conaboy's seps that are associated with BY3292 sub-branches so connecting traditional genealogy with the genetic information we have. So we're in the process of recruiting members to upgrade to big Y that have documented O'Neill lineage. This would be very helpful in matching the O'Neill seps to the SNP branches. Some of the specific Conaboy lines of interest include the O'Neill's of Lisbon and the O'Neill of Viva and the line of Hugh O'Neill who may be the son of Brian John who immigrated to Virginia in the 1700s. We're encouraging all O'Neill variety kits to upgrade to 111 STR markers. This would confirm that the kits are either BY32 positive or negative and provide information for further SNP testing. We'd like to assist kits that have hit the Irish traditional research early 1800s brick wall through appropriate DNA testing. That's why I agree there. Finally, per summary, the project is just one example of many surname projects that have made significant advances through broad based STR and big Y testing. I'm certain that there's members here within other surname projects that have had similar results. We are now very close to relating identified HAPO groups to specific O'Neill seps. I'd like to do a sincere thanks to all the kits in the FTDMA O'Neill project especially those that have completed big white upgrades. We feel that we're in the golden age of genealogy research by using a broad range of genetic genealogy tools. Thank you. Thank you. Sean, c'mon up here. Have a seat, Dwyne. Thanks very much for a fascinating project. The O'Neill plan is just such and the O'Neill surname in general is fascinating surname because it's one of the oldest in Ireland. In fact, what I'm going to do is I'm going to give you this and I'm going to take that so that you don't bother fiddling with it because it is very, very fiddling. So it's great to see the big strides that you're making in the project. Where do you get most of your genealogy from? I'm directing this at Sean because I saw him with a big book earlier on. I'm very happy to announce that my dad did the genealogy of all the main branches of the O'Neill and I have a copy of it there. People want to see it. Unfortunately, it's out of print at the moment. So it covers all the main branches of the O'Neill and we're trying to actually find the DNA associated with all the main branches so that when people come and approach us, we can say this is what you want. If you want to do a test, here's a test to do and from that test we'll be able to identify which branch you're associated with. Thank you, Sean. You can hold on to the microphone. This one's working fine now. Now the O'Neill's have spread out of course all over the world. So are most of your membership coming from America, Ireland? What about some of the places they went to? Because they went to the countries in Europe that they would not possibly be speaking English. They went to the Caribbean where you've got O'Neill's in Puerto Rico. So where are your membership coming from? The majority of our members are from the United States but we do have significant numbers from Europe specifically the UK. Obviously we have loads of members in Ireland and in Northern Ireland. We also have members in France. We have members down in South America. We have members from Russia and I'd like to welcome Lydia from Russia. So we are spread around the globe. In many ways the O'Neill diaspora is quite unusual in the sense that most of the Irish diaspora would have been if you like poor people emigrating to find a better life. But the O'Neill's had to kind of flee the country. It was the flight of the Urals. So you actually went to places that maybe a lot of other Irish people wouldn't have gone to. I'm not a historian but we did. Obviously we went to Spain and we joined the armies there. We went to France and joined the armies there. As a result we fought in lots of lots of wars around Europe and I suppose we also fought in the United States as well. So which of you guys speaks Russian then? You speak fluent English I'm sure. But have you actually found that you've had to use Google Translate a lot for example? Not really, no. I think a lot of lots of people speak English and put the rest of us to shame. Questions for the O'Neill team. So we have one from Jared here. I'm going to use my microphone. You can hold on to that. Yes, a few suggestions and a question. I have a volume at home. It's a great book of Irish genealogies. 3,600 pages of ancient genealogies. I'm just wondering how many of you think you will identify in matching the ancient genealogy to the SNP? Right? In other sources Barczewski published over 100 detailed genealogies of chiefly lines. OK. And they are all available online. The one which intrigues me is the I think the 13161 which is year 27 and we all know that I frequency the year 27 is Iberia. So have you found the Malaysian connection? Have you just passed the microphone there to Fred? No, that's where we find the fact that our DF 27 we have a whole block of 29, 25 SNPs before it shows up here. So if you look at that 3,000 years where has it been for 3,000 years? And so it probably made some path. Maybe it came directly from Spain, maybe it came from Scotland, someplace else. But we don't know where it came from and I would love to find out. It is a tantalising mystery, isn't it? Other questions for the O'Neill project team? We have several here. So I'm going to come down to this lady here. There we go. I'll hold it for you. Sean, I want to know about your little black book. Oh. Can we acquire a copy of that? I'll have to get it republished. You have to get it republished. So it's not available at the moment? No. OK. But that's something to put on your Christmas wish list, definitely. Question here. Can you pass that microphone to each other? The southern O'Neill's defendants of the northern O'Neill's are at the sitting on the same timeline horizontally. Which of you would like to answer that question? Which O'Neill's are you referring to? The southern O'Neill's and the northern O'Neill's. There's a break between the southern and the northern O'Neill's. As far as I can tell, both of them are are urgent about the same time. Both start back around the year 1,000 plus or minus. So it's an old name in both places. So is there a genetic but there would be a genetic connection at some point in time between the two. Would you think that it might be 2,000, 3,000, 4,000 year back rather than 1,000 years back? Well the connection between them as far as we can tell is the the DF-13 which dates back to around 2,000 B.C. Or maybe you can call a 1650 you know it depends. There's a margin of error there and you want to just go back to what the bar would say where it should be from Alicia. But it's well before the time of certain ends and well before the time of the game of the class. Oh yeah. Great. We have a question here from Jim. Come in, thank you. So I'm wanting to explore the possibility of putting together a SNP pack that would you know leverage the results of the big wide testing and then help you parse out the different individual results. Can you actually do that though? Put a SNP pack together for all of the emails or would you have to have several SNP packs for each of the branches? Well for for BY-32 92 positive we've had very good success at using signature STRs to recommend a specific SNP test and so that was shown in one of the slides where I think all but one recommended SNP test came back as positive. Now for the group for BY-32 92 negative being the Z-1513 group right now we had as I mentioned the branches seems like there was a SNP desert there for 300 years where the as you recall on the slide the three branches on one side don't have any specific SNPs and so we're using at this point in time STR values but we're hoping that over the next short while the more new big wide test will flesh that out. And we have a question from Patty Walton I'm trying to figure out who discovers these new SNPs I understood that BY Holding it away from you I can't hear myself I understood that BY indicated it was discovered by family tree DNA and was from a big wide but when I checked Sean on the big tree he's a BY but on family tree he's still a Z and BY-32 400 isn't even in the family tree DNA family tree family tree doesn't recognize BY-32 400 because it's in the BY-Z 19 region but the big tree recognizes that particular SNP and that's why it's shown on the big tree family tree as a branch part of what we're looking for is we're looking for places we're actually looking for additional SNPs to break it up because what we ended up with was everyone in parallel no common SNPs so they came up with one which is not a strong one but it's at least a way to show some grouping and they did say that the others did not have that so it's a weak one but it did show a little bit of a way to break it up and it's been consistent too it's been consistent too great okay well I think it's fascinating work that you're doing and the way that the project is evolving is incredible you're discovering more branches and of course the value for the people that are actually in your project is that they can hang their genealogies on your SNP slash STR tree like Christmas baugles on a Christmas tree so that's the invitation to all the O'Neils there's also another invitation to all the O'Neils and Sean if you take that microphone and just let them know everybody's entitled to join us in the land sound room for a drink afterwards if you want to continue this discussion okay thank you and on that note it just remains for me this wonderful expert panel for the incredible great work that you're doing on the O'Neil project and hopefully you'll come back in a few years with another update and bring some more O'Neils with you so ladies and gentlemen I give you the O'Neil see you next time thank you


Boy, do I have a treat for all of you today because we have news about who judge Judy is going to endorse in 2020 And you know, I've been agonizing over this I've played out the scenarios in my head wondering who she's going to support But we finally have an answer judge Judy is going to support Billionaire Mike Bloomberg who is currently trying to buy his way into the White House So I mean candidates vie for it, but only one is lucky enough and this time it's Mike Bloomberg So judge Judy is going to now Advocate for him and this is the case that she made. I'm judge Judy Scheinlin, and I'm a pretty good judge of character Mike Bloomberg will be a great president. He's a job creator a manager Innovative mayor and an impactful philanthropist.  That was amazing. Thank you, Judy Judge Judy I should say Yeah My first thought was Why do we care about what judge Judy says and how sad is this for Mike Bloomberg that the only Name worthy person, I guess who is choosing to support his campaign Is that really mean lady who yells at people on TV yells at poor people specifically on TV? Like why does this matter and in actuality? It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter at all But the reason why I wanted to talk about this the coveted judge Judy endorsement Judith Scheinlin I think that's her name pretty sure Is because for whatever reason the mainstream media is taking this seriously They're treating this as if it's a big deal. She's a TV judge. We're talking about this endorsement because why? Apparently this is a really big deal So she went on cable news to explain why she has endorsed Mike Bloomberg because there's just so much at stake And he's the right person for the job at this time so she went on the view and Joy Behar pressed her in a really shitty way and Asked her why she would support someone who is relatively controversial because he's trying to buy his way into the Election into the White House. That's kind of bad for democracy And I'm interpreting, you know, the way that Joy Behar framed the question way more charitably than she actually did Nonetheless, here's what judge Judy had to say Bloomberg has already spent his which we know he's rich. He spent a hundred and fifty five million dollars on campaign ads So critics are saying that he's just another billionaire like Steyer Who's basically what they say? I don't see it this way But a lot of people say he's trying to buy his way into the campaign and into the election. So is he Well, the last time I looked Tom Steyer never governed anything. No, but That's some good shade I like I Was about the money Well, I mean you can also say that Biden also has experienced as vice president You said none of them have any try any experience with governing they have actually well either you're the president of the company And you're the vice president of a company.  They go they go to the United States of America. It's a number two big number It's a big number, too. Yeah, it still isn't the responsibility of governance and I don't I think that to define Mike Bloomberg as just another rich guy is one of the greatest injustices of this political Campaign that we're in because Mike Bloomberg is the only one of the candidates who has experienced governing and managing and Successful and if he's successful and happened to have made money being successful That folks is the American.  I'm sorry.  I don't believe this that he's trying to buy his way into the race How do you respond? And of course judge Judy couldn't really defend it because that is not really defensible like having a billionaire trying to literally Buy his way into the White House That's something that can't happen If you care about democracy, right?  She's a television judge you guys She yells at poor people Okay, um and then on top of that her rationale for supporting him is completely nonsensical She claims that she supports him because he has the most experience now. He doesn't have the most political experience He was only a mayor, but he has the best kind of experience He is a self-made billionaire who ran his own camp company. So if you're the president of a company That's more important than being the president of you know, um a state a governor if you will um, that rational makes absolutely No sense and then she goes on to say that you know him being rich We can't like fault him for that. I'm paraphrasing obviously. That's just the american dream No The american dream is not becoming a billionaire judge. Judy.  You've stayed out of it scrupulously for so long. Why now? We're a very young country 250 years old Still cutting our teeth I don't think we need a revolution I also think that we need Someone who can bring this fractured american family Back together again When you can't go to a dinner with old friends or even with your family without Open more fair and hostility over politics I just got tired of the anger, you know, i'm senior I have children and grandchildren I want them to grow up in the country that I think is the greatest country in the world And I think that the greatest country in the world should have the greatest president Sadly when you go into politics these days He said to somebody it's like having a daily colonoscopy, you know, it's Without that nice drug that puts you to bed. Well with a proper fall. Yes, right But but every aspect of your life is explored and dissected So you have to be brave in order to do that So I actually give credit to the entire democratic field for getting out there and exposing themselves But I looked at that field And I said I don't see greatness there And I don't see someone who can stand toe to toe with the incumbent And Be successful. I don't think that anybody matches Mike Bloomberg's experience Being number two isn't being number one What about federal versus just a mayor? Well Federal you mean you're talking about the two senators vice president of the united states. These are senators. They deal with big issues big scale He's a mayor I will respond to your question in a What I consider a moderate tone Joe biden is a very nice man. I'm sure he is he wasn't a great For 40 years Wasn't great, you know, you took jabs out That's the job. That's the job.  So he wasn't great then. What makes him great now. What makes him very great He's really wealthy. He did it himself. He came up from nothing Another guy knows how to govern. How does he know how to govern on this level with these kinds of issues and players? Well, first of all, he's been out there since he's been out of office. He's been out there internationally Climate change He's been involved in world health Through his philanthropies. He's been out there. He's big on gun control also and he's big on gun control gun safety he's You know, if if you think about it Everybody not everybody I'm sure you didn't Smoked in restaurants bars and bars. We were used to it, you know, sort of used to it I smoke now with all the stress that I'm under. I'd smoke right here right now if I wouldn't get fired Mike Bloomberg said it's unreasonable Well, when he said it's unreasonable. You can't smoke in bars and restaurants anymore New york city thought it was going to collapse. It didn't and his standard that standard became the standard in the united states and if you travel internationally With the exception of certain countries people don't smoke inside restaurants anymore. They don't and that's because There was a vision That this is the right thing For people just like buckling up for safety.  I know I couldn't help myself Just one more time This is why I can't like put in memes too much in my videos because I overuse them and just irritate the audience And it usually means that are like at least five years old Sometimes I've got that boomer mentality So she obviously at the beginning of that clip took a shot at bernie sanders. She said I don't think we need a revolution Question, why would she say that answer? She is worth an estimated $420 million for 20 blaze duty I Mean imagine if you had $420 million it doesn't matter who's elected who's the president who's in charge of congress None of that matters because nothing the government does will impact you in any meaningful way She's going to be great. It doesn't matter if the entire, you know Planet becomes engulfed in flames She's rich enough to buy one of these, you know life boats that will inevitably be built Probably the kind that we saw in elysium with matt daemon, which is a great movie by the way I mean, she's she's okay. She's gonna be perfectly fine So it doesn't matter who is in office But yet at the same time even though she's so rich that she's insulated from these issues that normal americans have to deal with You know the reason why she's choosing to break the silence and talk about politics is because So much is at stake and mike bloomberg is just such a fantastic candidate That we have to support him. It's really important. She just can't stay silent So why are you supporting him? Well, I mean look at his experience He managed to make sure that smoking was banned indoors He kind of indirectly facilitated that catalyzed that movement, but that's what he did Is that honestly a reasoning judy? You're literally Saying that we should all support this billionaire who's trying to buy his way into the white house Because he complained about smoking indoors Because he believes that Being a nanny, which is not going to play well in a general Is going to help him win.  She doesn't even have a political ideology. I'm assuming it's just this like vague amorphous idea of like being kind to each other and Supporting experience. I don't know But I mean, this is just this is not a good reason for someone who is intelligent You'd expect better reasoning, but there's nothing there. She gave us nothing and on top of that She wants someone who can unite the country because she's tired of all this division First of all explain why the country is divided into the first place, but you can't second of all Why is mike bloomberg of all people the one who can unite the country? Why like you haven't adequately described as a surrogate for mike bloomberg Why he's the one most capable of uniting the country. Why? What is it about him that makes him more capable? If anything he's divisive because most people in the democratic party I'm assuming don't like that.   I'll link to it down below if you want to watch it But stop and frisk came up and I mean the way that she defended him embarrassing She basically said well, you know, he has genuinely changed.  It doesn't matter to me that you have good intentions What matters to me is that you know the right policies that will produce good results for the country Period end of story Mike Bloomberg is not able to demonstrate that he can do that If anything being a billionaire It shows that he doesn't have the right instinct to do what's good for the country because by hoarding that much wealth It shows he is a bad person It shows that he doesn't have the right character that we need in the white house Right? You're a bad person If you're a billionaire because you're never going to be able to spend all that money Even if he's lucky enough to live to be 2000 years old not going to happen And what I take away from all of this and I mean this is sheer speculation mind you is that Judge Judy doesn't really believe that Mike Bloomberg politically is the best bet You know who can actually unite the country and deliver on policy I think that the only reason why she's supporting him is probably because like their friends or something And they hang out, you know at the same cocktail parties That's that's the only reason because if you are going to break your silence when you don't really get political And talk about who you're supporting You'd think that there'd be this really huge reason that there's just even if I don't necessarily agree I want to be able to understand your reasoning and hearing her speak I don't get it So I mean judge Judy is canceled. It's as simple as that I'm part of the problem Yeah, she's canceled though. Seriously.  Judge Judy yell at me point your finger at me.   I don't care I love it. It's my kink to be yelled at by judge Judy I've said too much. Okay, I'm gonna end the video there judge Judy endorse Mike Bloomberg And the media is going along with this as if it's a big deal. It doesn't matter um judge Judy's endorsement is Inconsequential the only thing that I find entertaining about this is the fact that anyone including Mike Bloomberg And judge Judy to a degree think this is meaningful Doesn't matter