Okay folks, here it is. You guys already know this star right here. Look, this is my cornbread. Some of y'all said it was like a little bit on a simple side, but listen, you gotta trust me, simple works. Today, we're making a chicken and sauces cornbread dressing. Let's get it. Okay, so look, you guys have seen, you know these ingredients, right? Not a whole lot to it, and I keep wanting to say the words simple. Look, we ain't gotta do all of that. I see people all over the internet putting all this stuff in there, but I promise you, if you want me to take you back home in that time machine to go see grandma and all of that, listen, follow this recipe. So let's go. Now, looking at these ingredients right here, it's super simple. We already got a roasted chicken.  This is right here is my stretch. I could have just made this twice, you know what I mean, but I like to add a little bit of this in the inside just for that flavor and it, like I say, it's like stretch. Now, I'm not gonna name every one of these ingredients because check this out. Listen, I got a new website. It's how it's smoking and grilling with AB and that's W-I-T-A-B dot com, right? That way you guys can go. You guys been asking me for it. Now you can go and print, screenshot, do whatever you want. I got that recipe. Hey, with that being said, we finna work. Now we're gonna prep. All right, so we're gonna talk about doing your celery. I'm not finna give no lesson on this right here. It's just about how I do it. And now I want you guys to say it with me because after somebody explained it to me, I got it. Listen, when we dice, right, you dice by the size. If it's big, it's for texture and somebody tell me in the comment section below what happens when we dice it when it's small. That's right. When you dice when it's small, it's about the flavor. All right, so celery, onions. I still gotta shred my chicken and this is my chicken and do it, right? This is gonna be like my little level of and I'll cut down my sage. I like using the fresh sage. Now would be a great time for me to go ahead and just hit bake because we're gonna preheat, right? 400 degrees. All right, so I'm gonna take my cornbread. We're gonna work with this in just one second. Now I'm gonna get my pan right here because listen, I'm ready to saute. Now, remember we talked about like it's the holiday we wanna level up and have the best ingredients, right? Let me go ahead and grab my infused olive oil. You can see it. You guys know when I got infused olive oil because it's got that little green tint on it, right? I guess that's part of the infusing. When you use that extra virgin, it's like really, really transparent. So I'm gonna go ahead and just give this about a tablespoon and a half. Now we add the butter.  Olive oil, butter, no burn. I mean you can still burn it if you turn it up that high but you see this right here? We got it going. As soon as that finished, we finna go with our veggies. All right, so we're gonna start with our veggies because I got them in the bowl. I won't start with my onions first. We'll just do them all together, right? We just wanna get these just, you know, give them a head start a little bit of the translucent side then we're gonna add our and do it. All right, so I want you guys to look at this right here. This is about as far as I wanna go.  All right, now what that means is, let me move this out of my way. And before you guys ask, yes, I got my soapy water and it's hot. Now I'm gonna go ahead and just add my and do it, right? We just add this here. We just wanna sweat it just a little bit. I don't wanna lose all of the flavor because we're going in the oven, right? So we just wanna get a little heat on it.  All right, so look, the real star is this right here, right? I know some of y'all wanna know like, hey, I thought he was gonna do something with all of that, you know, do that. I got several cornbreads that do all of that. But when you do it right, look at this right here. You see that edge right there? Remember how we heated up the skillet? We put it on there. When you, if I'd have served this that day, it'd have been super moist with cornbread and crispy edges, right? So I'm just gonna take this and just start doing it. Now you guys get a chance to look at it in the inside. You know what I mean? We're just gonna crumb a little bit just so that I can work with it. We leave no crumb behind. Okay, folks. Now listen, I'm gonna tell you ways you can level this up. I'm gonna turn this off. I could add like a teaspoon of Creole kick or any Creole seasoning that you guys like. You know what I mean? But most of y'all got the Creole seasoning. You know what I mean? We could add that to it, you know, just right now, but I'm not trying to make a Creole version of it because I do do that also. You know what I mean? I'm finna lighten up on everybody that's coming, this thing's given. You know what I mean? So we just gonna keep it like this. What I will do is I'm gonna add a pinch of salt to this. But right now I'm gonna take it and I'm just gonna let it, you see the way it look? We're just gonna go ahead and put it in there just like that. Your mouth should be watering right now because I know y'all wanna just smell right where we at right now. And I got it. I look on the internet just like y'all do and I see these people doing all of that. You know what I mean? There's nothing wrong with it. I do it like that sometime too, but I gotta say this, listen, when you make it right, this should take you down that time machine and I promise you, you're gonna swear you right next to Big Mama while she do her thing. So now I'm just gonna go ahead and just put this in here just like that. I'm gonna set this over here. Now I gotta melt some butter, right? Now we got a little flavor, you know, left in the pot. You know, just a little bit. These are hex clad pots and pans. You know what I mean? Nothing really sticks, but I'm gonna still get the little residue of my infuse with the onion and the celery, right? So now I'm gonna take, you know, my butter. We'll just put it in here and let this melt. Now I'm gonna go ahead and address this right here. Remember I had this? I tell you, this is more stretch for me than anything, right? It depends. You can see right here, I got a 13 by nine. I'm finna spray it with a non-stick spray. You guys can do it old school. You can go ahead and take it and just, you know, hey. Let me, since we talk about old school, I should just go in and get that butter and run it right around the heads of that and do the bottom and make that non-stick. But you gotta do whatever you wanna do. So if I were doing two of these, you know what I mean? I could have done that, split it in half, use this as a little stretch and went from there. Now we're getting ready to shred down. You know, this bird right here, because I said it's gonna be chicken and sausage, right? Okay, so look, we got the chicken. It's all shredded. I probably used three quarters of it. If you're doing the, it's up to you. Again, I gotta say that it depends on how much dressing you want and how much chicken you want to be in your dressing, right? So I'm gonna just go ahead. I did dark meat and white meat. And yes, I did take off the skin. I'm doing that man for the internet.  I like it.  So now we're just gonna go ahead, scramble up our eggs, right? All right. Just go ahead and do it this way. You don't have no whisk handy. You know, we all good with that fork, right? Remember I melted my butter, wanting to pick up everything. You can hear it. Look, we just pour this in here like that. Now I'm gonna come back, come over this with the egg, kind of like going to the outside. It doesn't make no difference, because you know what? It's all getting ready to get combined in there. Now I don't know other way to tell you guys to do it, but I like to get in there and get, you know, with my hand. And then if you see some of your chicken need to be shredded down just a little bit. I don't want it to be stringy. I like to, when I take a bite, I wanna be able to get something that look like this. Check that out. That's fine right there. Now, I'm gonna get in here and work. Right? I'll just give it just a little bit right now. Cause you know what we gotta have next? You guessed it. We gotta go chicken stock or chicken broth. So after I just get it semi-mixed up, you know what I mean? I see where we going with it right now, right? Then you know we gotta add this, right? This is where we gonna get our moisture. Now I told you guys everything you need to know as far as how many cups, you know what I mean? We just start off right here. As the broth starts to absorb, you see where we're going. You know what I mean? Now listen, if you feel like you put too much in there or whatever, I gave you the recipe cause I usually do two of these, right? So you can just see how it is. Don't forget, we gonna lose a little bit of the moisture in there, still gonna be moist for those of you guys that like to have it on the Southern style. So if you take a look, you see how I'm just folding this? You know what I mean? Listen to bread crumbs, you know your cornbread that's going to absorb all of your moisture. And I don't know if I said earlier, I might have said that was four cups. That was six cups. It's always gonna take that, you know what I mean? But if you look at that right now, nothing is running down the bottom. It's nice and moist. Last thing I'm gonna do is I'm gonna take my, you know, my peppermill right here and I'm finna grind out. Meaning I'm gonna have to like work with it for a minute. I'm getting ready to put about a tablespoon of fresh ground black pepper. Okay, folks, this is it right here. I don't know if you guys can hear that. Listen, that's what you want. It's really, I'm telling you, you don't have to overpower it or overdo it. Try to make, I don't know what you're trying to do, but you ain't gotta do that. Listen, just trust me on this. This right here works. I'll be, you'll be surprised because I am every time more people ask me about this right here than they do anything. Okay, so look, when you turn out and it looked like that, look at that right there. Oh my goodness. And you saw that I just made that cranberry sauce? Watch out. All right, so listen, we're going in the oven uncovered. We're gonna go in for about 45 minutes to about 55 minutes. You know what I mean? We're gonna look at it at 45 because if we start browning too much, we'll just lay a layer of foil over the top just to keep it from, you know, browning too fast. Now, with that being said, I'm finna hurry up and get in and I'll see you guys in about 45 minutes. Okay, folks, that's it right there. Now, let me address this. I put it, you know, I put a timer in there for 45 minutes, right? So then I checked it, I stuck a toothpick just to see how damp and moist it was on the inside. But then I liked and I saw where it was at.  I didn't tuck it in nothing like that and I went another 10 minutes. So that's 55 minutes total. And don't forget, folks, the shiny side up on aluminum foil. Now I'm gonna go ahead and let this just sit up. I'm gonna let it, you know, sit up and rest for probably about 10 minutes and then we'll go ahead and taste it. I can tell you it's already fired, though, folks. Okay, fam, look, this is what it looks like. It's really, really nice. I don't know if y'all can hear that, listen.  This is nice. And when I hit it with a toothpick, it's still a little moist on the inside. I don't know about y'all, but look, I got my cranberry, you know, my cranberry sauce right here, which is homemade, folks. You know, that video just dropped. Hey, matter of fact, it just dropped today, right? So I'm gonna go ahead and just get me a little bit of this right here. You know what I mean? I hate to even do this, but you know what, we're gonna make this a few times. Look at that right there. Now, the reason I'm gonna do that and don't put that all in my mouth right now, pause is because it, check this out. I'm gonna take this and eat it the same way. I went with the edge, right?  I'm gonna take a little bit of this cranberry. Only thing missing is that gravy. Cheers, y'all.  And remember, I didn't put all of that, like I see in some of these other videos. Listen, when I tell you simple works, it works. Only thing I tell you I could have had on here is a whole lot of gravy. Now, with that being said, oh, you know what, I want you guys to check this out. If you go to my website, listen, I got my first standalone cookbook, right? I'm taking pre-orders right now and giving the discount. Listen, go by my website, smoking and grilling with AB. That's W-I-T-A-B dot com. It should pop up, give you a code and get yours, folks, I'll be shipping on Black Friday. With that being said, this is fire. Talk to me and let me know what you would have done. If you really want to ask me what I would have done, I could have leveled this up with a little bit of bacon. Hey, with that being said, listen, if you're new to my channel, let me just take the time to say thank you for watching this video. Don't forget to like, smash that subscribe button and tell everybody out there. There's a channel out here that simplifies these recipes and I've been taking that mystery out of cooking. Peace.


So I'm not sure how many people know this, but Think Progress is a news organization that is essentially the media arm of the so-called Center for American Progress, which is a neoliberal, pro-corporate, billionaire-funded think tank that's run by Neera Tandon, who hates Bernie Sanders.   It's the same thing like Media Matters. They're run by David Brock, but every once in a while they'll do really good compilation videos of Fox News. So I'm not going to dismiss the totality of the organization, but with that being said, in the event, the so-called Center for American Progress needs Think Progress to act as an attack dog for them, they will do that. And they recently just did that. They released a series of political hatchet jobs at the behest of the so-called Center for American Progress in an effort to attack and delegitimize Bernie Sanders.  And they additionally released a video where they played all of the different times Bernie Sanders talked about millionaires and billionaires, but they tried to frame him as being a hypocrite because as he denounces the millionaire and billionaire class, his wealth was substantially increasing simultaneously due to the sales of his best-selling book. Now, to be clear here, Bernie Sanders never took a vow of poverty nor did he say that wealth was intrinsically bad, but when he talks about the millionaire and billionaire class, you have to be clear, he's talking about their greed. So in the event, Bernie Sanders suddenly became a millionaire and then tried to dodge his taxes, he stored his earnings in the Cayman Islands and then started enacting legislation that would cut his own taxes, then I think it would be reasonable for us to deduce that he's hypocritical, but just the mere fact that he's now a millionaire does not make him inherently hypocritical. That's absurd. He always is very specific in calling out the greed of the millionaire and billionaire class. And there's countless videos of him doing this, but think progress wasn't actually trying to be honest and put out an objective piece of journalism that demonstrates how Bernie Sanders is now a hypocrite, all they were trying to do is act as the attack dog for the Center for American Progress, again, run by near attendant who despises Bernie Sanders and they just simply wanted to find whatever issue they could lob at Bernie Sanders because look, we've seen this for multiple years now. Whatever scandal they can throw at Bernie Sanders, they throw at him because they want something to stick and nothing's really stuck because there's no scandals of Bernie Sanders. You can comb through decades worth of footage and he's being consistent. He's talking about how the greed of the millionaire class is ruining the economy. He talks about wealth and income inequality. So there's nothing that's sticking because there's no real scandals. But with that being said, the media think progress, Center for American Progress, they're trying to manufacture some type of scandal in order to delegitimize Bernie Sanders because again, he poses a threat to what they're trying to protect. The status quo. Now, what's ironic is that near attendant, the head of the Center for American Progress, she constantly denounces attacks on Democrats. So if you recall back in December, David Serota, before he was working for Bernie Sanders, he published an article about Beto O'Rourke and basically just outlined how conservative his record was. And near attendant basically had a conniption fit. She literally suggested that it's unacceptable for any Democrat to be attacked. And she even called it quote seriously dangerous, implying any attack on a Democrat would help Trump. And she even called on Sanders to repudiate this quote attack, which was actually just Beto O'Rourke's own record. But now that think progress is attacking Bernie Sanders after she previously denounced attacks on Beto O'Rourke and attacks on any Democrat because it helps Donald Trump. Well, now what does she have to say? If anyone's a hypocrite, it's not Bernie Sanders. It's near attendant because how are you going to denounce attacks on any Democrats? And then you're going to allow the media organization of think progress of the Center for American Progress to attack Bernie Sanders. I mean, you've got to understand what's happening here. The Democratic Party establishment and Democratic Party elites, they have a set of standards that they apply to progressives that they don't follow themselves. And that's what we're seeing here. And thankfully Bernie Sanders saw it and he finally decided to call it out. So he actually penned a letter to them that the New York Times picked up and he questioned why if it's totally unacceptable for anyone to attack any Democrat, then why is the Center for American Progress' media arm publishing right-wing attacks on Democrats? Not just Democrats like Bernie Sanders, but Democrats such as Elizabeth Warren, Democrats such as Cory Booker and also why are they publishing ad hominem attacks on Bernie Sanders? So he writes Center for American Progress leader near attendant repeatedly calls for unity while simultaneously maligning my staff and supporters and belittling progressive ideas. I worry that the corporate money cap is receiving is inordinately and inappropriately influencing the role it is playing in the progressive movement. I and other Democratic candidates are running campaigns based on principles and ideas and not engaging in mudslinging or personal attacks on each other. Meanwhile, the Center for American Progress is using its resources to smear Senator Booker, Senator Warren and myself, among others. This is hardly the way to build unity or to win the general election. I will be informing my grassroots supporters of the foregoing concerns that I have about the role cap is playing. Should your actions evolve in the coming months, I am happy to reconsider what kind of partnership we can have. This counterproductive, negative campaigning needs to stop. The Democratic primary must be a campaign of ideas not of bad faith smears. Please help play a constructive role in the effort to defeat Donald Trump. Now, I think that this is a brilliant move by Bernie Sanders because he's basically using their own words against them. How can they say that any and all attacks are seriously dangerous but yet do it themselves constantly? It's because Nira Tandon is an opportunistic Democratic Party establishment crony. She's just doing their bidding and she doesn't really care about any Democrat being attacked because she's all in favor of attacks on Bernie Sanders. And she signed on to basically every single smear that the establishment has thrown at Bernie Sanders. And she's someone who probably still hates Bernie Sanders because she was most likely hoping to get a cushy job in Hillary Clinton's administration. But since Hillary Clinton lost, well, she's trying to use that as evidence that Bernie Sanders somehow must have hurt Hillary Clinton in the general election because he was so dirty against Hillary in 2016, which is just nonsense. But here's what Nira Tandon is.  She is everything that she accuses everyone else of being. And it's not just that she's a bully towards progressives and Bernie Sanders. She's a bully towards her own staff because there was a story that came out in 2018 about how she literally outed the name of an anonymous staffer from the Center for American Progress who accused someone else of harassment. Now, the reason why you want to make sure that staffers identities are protected is because one, you want to make sure that they're protected from harassment or blowback. And two, you want to make sure that you don't discourage others who are the victims of harassment at your organization from speaking out. But she knows this in a professional environment.  And she purposefully outed that staffer. Otherwise, I think she's just so incompetent that she needs to resign. But here's what I think a lot of us were thinking. How is Nira Tandon going to respond because what he did here was expose her blatant hypocrisy. So how is she going to respond? Well, I think that my initial prediction was that she was just not going to say anything. However, now she's forced to act because an individual who matters the most actually acknowledged Bernie Sanders letter and surprisingly took Bernie Sanders side. So I'm talking about one of the Democratic Party and caps billionaire donors, Tom Steyer, who states voters deserve a fair and unbiased primary election. And I will use my voice on the Center for American Progress Board of Directors to discourage any such attacks on any candidate seeking the Democratic nomination in the future. Now, can you guess what happened after a billionaire came out and denounced the Center for American Progress? Then she responded like that and she put out her own statement saying that think progress has editorial independence, although the video that they put out in her view was overly harsh. This is what we're going to have to deal with for the next couple of years. We're going to have to deal with these types of bad faith smears against Bernie Sanders. And I'm not saying that Bernie Sanders is above criticism. I've been critical of Bernie Sanders. I've stated that I think he needs to do better when it comes to reparations. I've stated that he needs to speak out on behalf of Julian Assange. I've stated that he needs to do better with regard to Israel Palestine. So there are good faith criticisms from the left of Bernie Sanders that you can lob against him. But what I am saying is that there's a lot of bad faith arguments that are trying to do anything to delegitimize Bernie Sanders. And the one thing they think they're going to be able to get his own base to flip on him over is this issue. Oh, well, if you hate millionaires, then why do you support Bernie because he's a millionaire now? We support Bernie because he's going after other millionaires. He wants to tax them as well as himself. And that's what we care about. It's the greed of the millionaires, not their existence. Now, billionaires is something else. I think that every single billionaire is in fact a policy failure. But there's a difference between somebody who's a millionaire and a billionaire. And if you don't acknowledge that, then I don't know what to say. But regardless, this is an argument that they're using against Bernie Sanders to frame him as a hypocrite. That's just not going to stick. But they're trying to make it stick. And I'm glad that he decided to speak out against what they're doing because it's just it's wrong. And if anybody should stop attacking Democrats, don't you think it's a Democratic Party think tank that should stop attacking other Democrats? Because you can say he's not a Democrat because he's been independent for most of his career. But he's more Democratic than Joe Manchin, who literally endorsed a Republican Susan Collins. So regardless, I mean, they're going to keep doing this. And once they move on from the millionaire issue when they realize that it's not going to stick, they're going to find something else. But I like that Bernie Sanders essentially issued a warning to them. Play nice or my grassroots supporters are going to know what you're doing and what your agenda really is. So I'm glad Bernie Sanders is fighting fire with fire because if you just try to ignore these attacks and you don't respond, then you're allowing them to monopolize the narrative, which is something you never want to happen in the midst of a campaign. So good on Bernie for speaking out and condemning this here.


Grand challenges describe the greatest, most persistent, and most pervasive problems facing humanity. At XPRIZE, we think of grand challenges as the factors that are preventing progress, the barriers that stop us from moving forward. They prevent us from achieving a desired future. Grand challenges are usually a product of various global conditions. These can be social, political, cultural, economic, or a complex combination of many. But they can also help us pinpoint the world's most promising opportunities. A grand challenge needs some sort of breakthrough to surpass the stubborn problems it entails. But what are breakthroughs? For XPRIZE, a breakthrough is a discovery or disruption that dramatically changes the trajectory of the future. They help us in achieving our desired future, one in which humanity has managed to overcome the grand challenges in a particular area or domain. XPRIZE competitions encourage technological innovations that will spark radical progress toward these breakthroughs. Possible breakthroughs are carefully selected for their ability to truly change the world. New financial and economic models, changes of regulations, global cooperation and agreements, and of course, technological innovation, breakthroughs come in many shapes and forms. The possibilities are endless. So when XPRIZE talks about breakthroughs in a particular topic area, we've made sure the ideas have a real chance of making a difference. And we suggest a wide array of potential breakthroughs. What's your breakthrough?


Hi, it's Weyland and I'll be talking about the tort of negligence in determining whether or not a particular person is Liable for negligence. We have to show or the plaintiff has to show that the defendant breached the applicable standard of care So the question that we need to consider is you know was the defendant careful enough? Or an even more specific question that a court would look at would be What would a reasonable person do in similar circumstances now? So that begs the question, you know, who is this reasonable person? Yeah, we don't know who exactly this person is. It's not it could be male. It could be female We don't know what their experience or what their upbringing is But let's let's let's let's find out some clues that courts have given us as to who is the reasonable person now Now to be clear the reasonable person Is not the defendant we are not asking You know whether or not the defendant did their best in that particular situation when the accident happened The the legal test that we apply here for standard of care is what's called an objective test and not a Subjective test. We're not asking subjectively whether or not the actual person Now did their best in in avoiding or or doing their job to avoid The accident we are asking whether or not a reasonable person Would have caused the same accident now in determining what a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances You know courts Have given us some clues or guidance So courts have said that a reasonable person takes precautions against foreseeable risks But not necessarily precautions against every conceivable danger Another another clue that we we have from from previous court decisions is that A reasonable person considers likely the likelihood of harm and the potential severity Of harm so a reasonable person would would logically sit down and think you know, how likely is something wrong Going to happen and and you know, how severe will be the consequences And another person another thing that a reasonable person would do is that a reasonable person would adopt affordable Precautions to prevent against mishap or or accidents or or injury So a reasonable person does consider the the the cost so there is a cost benefit analysis that a reasonable person Would would apply A reasonable person to takes risks in where Social utility is involved So a reasonable person would take greater risk if it involves an emergency kind of situation where Where the reasonable person is trying to save someone's life for example And related to that is also the sudden Parallel doctrine Which which allows a reasonable person to to make mistakes where Where there are difficult circumstances circumstances, especially in an emergency situation So we so we cut a person more slack in an emergency situation If the person being sued for negligence happens to be a professional such as a lawyer a doctor or accountant Or an engineer for example Then we we don't apply the general standard of a reasonable person because a A reasonable person Does not have the the the expertise or training of any of those professionals So we apply a higher standard to professionals the the question that we ask is what would a reasonably competent and experienced professional Do in similar circumstances? So who is this reasonable professional? So this reasonable professional is reasonably competent and reasonably experienced And if whatever level of expertise is being claimed by by the professional If they claim to be a doctor we hold them to the standard of a reasonable doctor So even if that if that person is either exaggerating or just or just plain lying about being a doctor If if that's what they say they are we hold them To the standard of a reasonably or reasonably competent and experienced doctor Now if if a if a professional Holds himself out to be a specialist So if a doctor says they are a heart specialist or a cardiologist Then they are held to that to the higher standard of a reasonably competent and experienced cardiologist Not not the standard of a reasonable. So a general practitioner If we have an inexperienced professional, let's say a lawyer fresh out of law school We don't cut that person any slack for being inexperienced We still hold them to the to the higher standard of being reasonably competent and reasonably experienced Our professionals are allowed to make errors of judgment and not be held liable for them So there is a difference between error an error of judgment and negligence An error of judgment is where a reasonable professional in that same situation You might have made the same decision So that would be considered an error of judgment for which there is no there is no liability under negligence Now in determining whether someone was reasonably competent And experienced in a particular situation we have to base it on the information that's reasonably available at the time of the accident It's always easy to look at the information that comes to light after an accident to assess Whether or not someone was negligent or not We you know that would be that would be an unfair way of assessing negligence We have to base it on the information that's reasonably available at the time of the accident If a professional happens to follow approved practice and still the accident happened or someone gets hurt Then usually there's no liability for having followed that standard professional practice So that standard professional practice could it is often you know set by the by the governing body for a particular profession As well sometimes uh under particular statutes There are there are certain requirements that have to be met by a professional if a professional happens To comply with that statutory standard that is at least a significant factor in determining That the professional exercise reasonable care and therefore is not Is not uh liable or has not breached the standard of care


What's good Josh boros back again with another video so back here with another preview and predictions for clash at the castle This upcoming Saturday looking forward to this pay-per-view event for the most part the builds for a lot of these storylines Have been pretty interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing what happened in some of these matches Man, this I'm thinking this is gonna be a great show I'm feeling like the crowd is gonna be energetic and I'm looking forward to seeing how things play out So let's get right into it. So we're gonna start with Finn Balor and Damian Priest versus Ray Mysterio and Edge with Dominic in Ray Mysterio's and Edge corner now I have been enjoying what they've been doing for the most part with With the judgment day group. They've been getting consistent wins outside of Damian Priest They've been getting they've been looking like a actual dominant faction that can get the job done I'm really interested to see What they do with Dominic here if you saw what happened on Monday night raw Dominic went in a simp mode when it came to laying the beats on Rhea Ripley, which I think a lot of us wanted to see but he ended up getting talked off the ledge I don't know what not maybe she she she gave him some of that good loving in the back while She was beating them up a couple weeks back and he remembered and he didn't he didn't lay the beats on like he should have So he got persuaded to not attack her So it would be interesting to see what they do with that and I like that there was a segment where he was talking Dominic was talking with his dad. He was like, yo, I thought you would want me as your tag partner and Ray was like I need someone that's experiencing these family and you can tell there's some reluctance With Dominic on that whole situation of edge being a part of their of this match. So I do think Dominic will cost them the match. I don't know if he's turning heel yet I don't know how I would feel about him quote-unquote joining Judgment Day but I do think a character change isn't aligned and Well in it's it's on the way a character change for Dominic and I do think he will turn Maybe not heel fully, but he will cost them the match and I see Finn Balor and Damian Priest getting the win over Raven stereo and Edge. I do think Rhea is gonna be a part of that Equation as well. So we'll see what happens. We'll read finally get the beats I don't know if it's gonna happen that class at the castle, but we will see but I have Finn Balor and Damian Priest winning that match. Let's get into the next match the I'm gonna say it's the three-on-three match between Bianca Belair, Oscar and Alexa Bliss versus Bailey, EO Sky and Dakota Kai. Now, we were expecting or a lot of us were assuming that Dakota Kai and EO Sky will win their match to become the new women's tag team champions, but that did not happen So I'm really interested to see what they do here because I don't think Bailey EO and Dakota need to take a loss here, especially EO and Dakota. I think they need to get some type of win and I do think there will be some shenanigans here I think it will be an enjoyable three-on-three match and I have the heels winning this. I have Bailey EO and Dakota winning this match I don't think Bianca is gonna take the pin there But I do have them winning because they need some type of momentum Going into well after them losing the whole tournament the women's tag team title tournament. So I do have them winning All right, let's get into the Other match that I'm I think a lot of us are really excited about Matt Riddle versus Seth Rollins. That match alone is worth checking out the show This is one of the few matches that has a lot of hype around it Triple H has booked this Very very well. It's it's seen personal. It doesn't seem goofy. They didn't rush it They could have had this match at Summer Slam Triple H decided to put this at class at the cast and I'm so glad he did if you haven't checked out my my analysis and review of their beautiful segment they had on Monday night raw between Matt Riddle and Seth Rollins go check that out right now. Oh, what I'm not gonna go into the great detail just know the build up for this has been fantastic and For me, I do think Seth Rollins will win here One or two things will happen either Seth Rollins wins by cheating some type of nefarious deeds or They both get disqualified like both get counted out because it's not really gonna be a match I can see them really trying to end each other's careers. So it's gonna be more of a brawl than a match I will want it to be like that But ultimately if it was to happen just to be a match and to potentially extend this feud I could either see it being a DQ on both of them either one person end up getting DQed Or I would prefer both of them getting DQed by count out or what not to can't control of the match or Seth Rollins wins by cheating and they Extend this feud, but if there wasn't if there is a match to be had I will say Seth Rollins will win either by cheating or it'll be a double DQ Something of that sort. So I'm very Interested in this match and I'm hoping they put on a great show in because I do believe they will all right now Let's get into the title contention matches. Let's start with the WWE Intercontinental title match Sheamus versus Gunther or Gunther however you want to pronounce it. This match is gonna be hard hitting I think riddle and Seth Rollins may still to show potentially But this one has a this one this match also has a contention of stealing the show as well Sheamus and Gunther they're about to lay into each other This is gonna be a stiff hard hitting matches Both of these guys are gonna probably be beat red whenever the match ends. I am looking forward to this I am looking forward to this technically you can say both of them are heels But I think with Sheamus last promo last week. He's coming off more as a baby face in the situation. I have Gunther winning I Have him barely winning but I have him winning. I have them going to war.  It's gonna be great. I have good our goon through winning this match, bro Very close in I don't have them cheating the win Gunther doesn't have to cheat it's gonna be a very close match and he'll barely get the win But that's my predictions on that one. All right, let's get into the Smackdowns women Championship match or title match Shayna Baszler versus Liv Morgan This is an interesting one Part of me feels like she could possibly retain, but I just Doesn't I just I don't see it I don't see her just beating Shayna Baszler like that. So one or two things happen I for whatever reason I have a feeling Liv Morgan will retain but There's gonna be it's it's gonna be some interference either Ronda Rousey will interfere and That's how Liv Morgan retains or it's a similar situation Where Liv Morgan may get a easy roll up personally I would prefer the Ronda Rousey situation getting involved into the match Because Ronda has a gripe like yo, you know saying she tapped out I should be in this match and Ronda is kind of unhinged right now. So I could see Ronda being the reason why Liv Morgan retains the title. That's it's gonna be some Weird, you know screwy finish, but I do believe Liv Morgan will hold on to this title just a little bit longer And maybe we get a Ronda and Shayna Baszler feud out of this in the process So that is my prediction. I know a lot of people are thinking Shayna should probably win it But I just I think they're still telling a story But I don't think Liv is gonna be losing not just yet so I think Liv is gonna be the one to retain here and Of course the main event a lot of us are really excited about this match Drew McIntyre versus Roman Reigns for the WWE Undisputed my bad the undisputed WWE Universal Championship match and I Am just I'm I've been thinking about this for the past couple days I really don't know who do I really pick here because if you saw last week's Of Smackdown the way the way Drew McIntyre got destroyed You would think all right Roman's drop in the title.  So I don't know I just I don't want to say that yet, but honestly in my opinion I do think that Roman will still be the champion I know a lot of us or a lot of people and I'm part of those people in this in the camp of our It's time for Roman to drop it But I just don't see him dropping the titles before the Usos do The Usos will drop the titles first. They don't have a match on this card Usos will drop the titles first. Hopefully they drop it. Eventually. They set it up Sammy and and Kevin Owens team up Going against the Usos. I hope they drop it I hope Sammy and Sammy and Kevin Owens end up winning the titles from them And then you can start Planning the seeds of the downfall because it doesn't make sense for the The tribal chief to drop to lose first before the Usos, you know I'm saying so I'm thinking it's gonna be a good match It's gonna be a great match gonna be some close close Near falls and it's gonna be situations where we think Drew's about to win and he's probably not Will there be some interference in shenanigans? I'm willing to bet But ultimately I do think Roman Reigns will retain if he doesn't I will be completely floored I'm not even gonna lie to you I will be so shocked and it wouldn't even be a bad shock. I would just be like, oh my god They actually pulled the trigger. So it would be a great moment for Drew to win there I'm not even gonna deny it. I would love for Drew to get the moment He deserved to have gotten when he beat the Brock Lesnar the year the COVID happened 2020 and no one was there he deserved that Moment so I'm all for him having a moment But I just don't see them dropping Roman dropping the titles right before the Usos do that's that's my only thing And that's it man. I have Roman winning winning the The main event and this is not a long card and I'm okay with it I am so glad this card is not to 20 matches They have matches that need to be on the card to have some feuds built up and it looks like this is gonna be a Concise concise show not too many matches just enough For people to get you know be entertained and there's feuds and Stories that they're telling that have people wanting to check it out hell with the Shameless and Gunther match people just want to check that out because they know it's gonna be a hard-hitting match You know I'm saying so I like the fact that they don't have everything on this card It's just a few matches to you know really get people invested and I think they need to continue just having Concise cards, I don't we don't need red you know wrestling events with like 10 matches We don't need that a few matches get the job done not every Championship will be defended not everybody will be on each pay-per-view But at least a few matches to you know Especially the ones that are building stories and you're trying to bring prestige to certain championships and stuff like that I think those deserve to be on pay-per-view. So comment down below Let me know your your predictions who you have winning or you have losing why and why not? Let's have this discussion In the comments down below, but I'm looking forward to class at the castle very excited Can't wait to Saturday man. This is gonna be a great time You know, we're gonna be live streaming it on the in the clutch main page.  We're gonna be drinking eat and have a great time I can't wait for this show bro This is gonna be a great wrestling weekend and I'm looking forward to all the wrestling events So I appreciate y'all kicking with me. See y'all next week. Peace


They say there's more than one way to skin a cat and so it is that there's more than one way to talk about chemistry, three ways in fact. This is a concept in chemistry known as Johnstone's triangle although the name isn't terribly important you can look that up in your own time. The first of these three ways is the macroscopic world. Then we have the micro or submicroscopic world and we also have the symbolic world. These are three different ways for talking about exactly the same thing and might be why chemistry is often difficult to learn. The macroscopic world involves things like lab chemistry. Here we describe things as having physical properties that we can test. Water is a liquid at room temperature, it's wet, it has certain mass and density or it takes a certain amount of energy to raise this temperature. In the microscopic world water is three atoms joined together. There are three nuclei and ten electrons buzzing around it. This interacts with other water molecules around it hydrogen bonding through electrostatic interactions. In the symbolic world we represent water as 80 to always balls and sticks or as a Lewis structure. We draw its electrons in a molecular orbital diagram and represent its bonds through lines and dashes and its charges with pluses and minuses. All of these describe the same thing but in three different ways and a good chemist needs to be able to jump around them easily. Chemical kinetics in particular is a great example. In the macroscopic world we see physical changes we can measure, a color change over time for instance. In the submicroscopic world atoms break apart and come together and they have to overcome a certain energy barrier to do so. In the symbolic world we represent this with mathematics and equations that help us predict exactly what will happen generating laws that the molecules seem to follow but ultimately we can't escape the fact that this is just three ways of describing the exact same thing.