So, tell me is a mass m kept over here fine, now this length is very small x tends to 0 ok, from here to here this length is l, mass per unit length is mu, find out how much time it will take for a disturbance to travel from here to here, you have created a disturbance here, how much time this disturbance will take to go from here to here. Sir, mu is given. Mu is given, it is straight forward, so velocity of the disturbance is root over t by mu, so the time is the l by root over t by mu, so this one, total mass of this rod is m and length is l, you need to find out how much time a disturbance from here will take to reach here, is tension same everywhere, tension is not uniform, draw the free body diagram to find tension at a distance x away from here, what is the tension over here. Sir, what is root of 2 by g? Dimensally incorrect, but I doubt whether it is correct. What is the tension at a distance x away from the base, anyone got that, t is equal to what? Draw the free body diagram of this portion, tension will pull it up, this is t, what is the mass of this portion? m by l x, m by l x, so this times g will be downward force, the tension is what? m g by l times x, this is the tension at a particular x, right, so the velocity is under root of t by mu, t is m g x by l divided by mu is m by l, so the velocity of the wave comes out to be root over g x, yes or no, velocity of wave depends on the where you are finding it, because tension is not uniform, this velocity and velocity is also d x by d t, velocity is not uniform, that is why you have to integrate to get the answer, you integrate this, 0 to t, 0 to l, t will come out to be how much, so this is the time, methods are there, whether you got the wrong answer also, it is fine, but method should be correct, this came in j advance couple of years back, okay, okay, lika bhai, lika, lika, lika, speed of longitudinal wave, longitudinal wave typically it is inside a medium, it is not on the surface of the medium, on the surface of medium there will be transverse wave mostly, okay, so once you are inside the medium, there is nothing like mass per unit length, okay, so what kind of inertia property we can say about the medium, mass per unit volume, okay, so my inertia property is density, okay, my elastic property is the bulk modulus b, okay, what is the formula for bulk modulus, anybody knows it, minus p by delta v by delta v, delta p by delta v is the bulk modulus, okay, so please use the dimension analysis, dimension analysis to find out what are the values of a and b, if velocity is depending on that, so if we hear the elastic is bulk modulus, then why don't we use shear modulus for transverse waves, that is not shear modulus, it is tension, so it is tension, but why don't we use shear modulus, this is bulk, see it will not fit in like this, you can use shear modulus also, no problem, you can use it, but the equation will not look like a simple equation, okay, anything that represents elasticity, what the value of a and b, a is minus half, b is half, even dimension analysis you will cut it, so velocity is root over b by root, remember this is the formula for the longitudinal waves, and if it is, see bulk modulus is usually calculated for the liquid or for the gas, okay, so if we are talking about solid, then bulk modulus is replaced by the Young's modulus, please write down, this is in case of solid, this is in case of fluid, fluid include gas, now what is the most common longitudinal wave modulus, sound, sound is the most common longitudinal wave, so let's try to find out what is the velocity of sound, so basically we are trying to determine the bulk modulus of air, okay, we are trying to apply this formula for the air, write down v is equal to b by rho for sound, what is sound, sound is a wave that travels in a, in air, okay, you have to stop doing that, don't play with the pen, it distracts me also, fine, so let's try to find out what is the bulk modulus, so bulk modulus is minus of v delta p by delta v, I can write it as minus of v dp by dv, okay, now when it comes to the atmospheric gas, can I treat it like an ideal gas, I can, I mean roughly it is an ideal gas because gas molecules are very far away from each other, it is not a compressed form of the gas, so more or less it behaves like an ideal gas, okay, so it follows ideal gas equation p v is equal to nRT, okay, now at the same time when the wave is travelling, what will happen, there will be compression and then expansion, it is a longitudinal wave, so travel like that, travel like that, okay, so what kind of thermodynamic process it is, I need to understand that also, so is it an isothermal process, adiabatic process, isocorect process, what kind of process it is, isothermal, isothermal comes in our mind, the most common because atmospheric temperature has to be constant, okay, so if it is an isothermal process, what is the process equation, p into v is constant, so at any moment wherever the wave is travelling, pressure into volume should be a constant, so assuming that it is an isothermal process, p v is constant, can you find out the value of bulk modulus, this one, try finding it out, just differentiate it, this expression differentiate with respect to v, what you will get, this is what you will get, so what will be the bulk modulus minus of v dp by dv is p only, p is what atmospheric pressure, okay, so the velocity of the sound should be equal to root over p by rho, okay, p is the atmospheric pressure, the value of atmospheric pressure you know is 1.01, 10 is power 5 Pascal, okay, density of the gas is roughly 1.29 kg per meter cube, okay, so can you roughly calculate the velocity of sound, anyone, just a rough estimation, what are the answers, 334, no, what calculate this, how much it is, so this is roughly 4 or not, under root of this 4 to the 8, no this is approximately 2.9, approximately 2.9, let us say 2.9, 2.8, so this is around 280 meter per second, roughly, okay, so the actual answer is yeah 280, so this is the velocity of sound, but experimentally velocity of sound is found to be 333, 333, 333 like that, so the assumption of it being an isothermal process is wrong, Newton has assumed that it is an isothermal process and he derived exactly like this, during those days nobody knew the speed of sound exact value, so everybody expected that this is the speed of sound, alright, later on when people understood that the speed of sound is not this, it is roughly 320 or 330, so they were wondering what Newton has done wrong here, so the only assumption Newton has made in entire process is this, that it is an isothermal process, okay, so Laplace is another scientist who came up and told everyone that it is not an isothermal process, rather it is an adiabatic process, how it can be an adiabatic process, there is no insulation anywhere, so how can it be adiabatic, it is open to the atmosphere, everything is open right there, if your system is this, where sound is there, it can exchange heat from surrounding as well. Is it because energy of the wave is conserved, like potential kinetic here or the potential kinetic here? Because the process happens very fast, it happens very quickly, so the heat doesn't get time to get transferred from one point to the other point, so it is a good assumption that it is an adiabatic process, because it happens very quickly, okay, so if you assume it to be adiabatic process, what will be the process equation like? P v raise to power gamma is constant, now tell me what is the bulk modulus, find out. Why is the isothermal assumption wrong?  That is in a very short time. So what? There is a change in temperature. It is because energy is conserved between an issue or another. Which energy? Energy of the wave you are talking about.  Temperature can suddenly go up and down, but heat can't suddenly get exchanged, heat needs time to get exchanged. P gamma v to the power gamma minus. Bulk modulus is how much? Bulk modulus is gamma p. How will you say gamma p differentiate that? P into gamma v gamma minus 1 plus v gamma dp by dv is equal to 0. So v dp by dv minus of that is gamma p. What is the value of gamma for the air? 1.4. Why? Diatomic. Mostly diatomic. So gamma is 7 by 5. Gamma is 7 by 5. So whatever answer you have got earlier, which was 280, this is multiplied by root over 7 by 5. So this should be the velocity. Quickly tell me how much it is. Now the answer come out to be 331.3 till Laplace correction. So why are we saying gamma is? Laplace. Oxygen iron. Okay. Any doubts till now? Anything? Anything we have done since start? So what was the equation? Time k. No sir, from the beginning. From the beginning. No, the wave equation is written in such a manner so that 2 by k becomes lambda and 2 by 5 omega becomes time period. So k has no right. You can say omega is angular frequency of SHM of the particles and k is referred as wave number because it is basically inverse of lambda but 2 pi is multiplied on it. So somebody doesn't have any like this? No, no. You can't actually find out in a wave it's given so this is k. Is there an SHM like one particle goes up and then the next? Is there will there be friction between the two? Like is there any friction? Elasticity is there. Elasticity. So because of the elasticity when I move some particle up this will automatically move up. If the medium is very brittle in nature then wave will not travel because elasticity is zero. This particle if you put a disturbance here this will not affect the neighboring particles. It will not move anywhere.


That clamp has pretty much caused my ears to produce dynamic range compression. Hey, it's Anafa. Have you heard the news? Ardor 6 has been released after what feels like three years since the last version. They've got the newest one out. Oh, that's much better. So on Ardor's website you can find an article about the new release and there's all the different stuff listed there. There's a very big change log, but the most important things they are mentioning are as follows. The whole signal path is perfectly latency compensated now. Previously in Ardor 5 and before, the latency compensation, as they say, was a bit spotty and didn't work ideally in all contexts and I mean, they mentioned this as a big, big point and I get it. It's important. So to me, as an end user, that's probably not going to be a life changer. I don't really think that much of latency compensation when I work, but there's other things that I do think about. And what I do think about is, for example, crash recovery. You see, one of the most important things to me that happened in Ardor 6 versus Ardor 5 is that the crash recovery or periodic backup system has been fixed because Ardor is pretty good at making sure you never lose anything that you record it in terms of audio. But when it comes to working with MIDI or automation lanes or changing effect patches, I have experienced data loss a few times and it's really painful. I think that one of the worst things that Creative Software can do is f*** over your work. That just kills the soul of an artist. That's why I've been pushing Autosave to be on by default in LMS, for example, because they had it and it works, but you need to first turn it on.  So finally they made it on by default. If Autosave even costs me extra performance, I don't care. I want to be safe. I want my projects to exist. So Ardor 6 fixes some Autosave problems, namely that it doesn't always work. Now it should be fine, but I still have to battle test it. I haven't been doing too much work with the newest release. I've been using some almost final versions and I've been checking some bigger work projects. For example, I have an Ardor session with like 250 sound effects for a game I've been working on for a client and I've opened this up in Ardor 6 recently and excluding a few sound effects that didn't want to export at all, it seemed to work okay. And when I filled it around with real-time rendering and I restarted it once and finally exported them, then when I compared the files exported from Ardor 5 and the ones exported from Ardor 6, opening the same session, I didn't notice any problems. So that's good because if you're migrating to a new version of software, the last thing you want is to do it and then realize everything is broken. And you can't go back. Especially if you're doing client work and you need to have it done fast and you can't like spend extra five hours just fixing stuff you already had done. So if that would be the case, I'd rather wait and keep using Ardor 5 for these projects.  But when I'm doing my own stuff, it's not such a big problem because sometimes even errors and bugs lead to some interesting creative decisions. For example, Ardor mistakenly broke a media region and it was not playing and that made me consider, huh, maybe I will mute it in this part and let it come in later. And that actually proved to be an interesting arrangement. Of course it's not that I want something like that to happen, it's that sometimes you can turn it into something good. Another thing I've noticed about Ardor 6 is that the plugin manager has been really, really changed and it looks not much nicer. I've also read that you can now add custom tags to plugins and that Ardor comes with like extensive tag lists for like 300 different plugins. I wonder if these are LV2 like open source plugins or commercial plugins or both. I don't know, I haven't seen that yet. But it seems like there is an option to like better organize the plugins you want to use or don't want to use. When I've been using this version 6 like two months ago, I reported a few bugs that were really irritating and like broke my work that I've been doing with Ardor 5. But when I checked it out like last week, I couldn't reproduce any of the bugs. So I think they fixed that all. Another great thing I think what they did is they changed how Ardor treats MIDI device input. For example, before in Ardor 5, if you wanted to use your MIDI keyboard to play an instrument track, you would have to arm it for recording and make sure that it has the appropriate MIDI input selected. And only then you would press a key and hear something. Because you also would have to turn on input monitoring instead of playing whatever is on disk. So there was quite a lot of stuff you had to do to just touch a note and hear it or if you want to record. Now it's much easier because you can select MIDI input devices in the global Ardor preferences and you can make these devices provide input automatically to any MIDI track that you select in the editor. So you can simply select a MIDI track, press a key on your keyboard and you've got sound. And you can also record just like that. So this is great because there's going to be no more fiddling with MIDI inputs and resigning that and arming the tracks and making sure that it monitors and what if you're recording and what if you're not recording. And yeah, they also introduce something that they call cue monitoring. So before in Ardor 5 and before you could either listen to what is being fed into the track from microphones or maybe a MIDI keyboard or you could listen to what's already captured on disk but not both. And now you can do both. Now one thing I'm not very fond of is how they change the time grid display. In Ardor 5 I can clearly see where are the beats when I zoom in to edit my MIDI. In Ardor 6 so far that is a problem. The beat lines are not emphasized and so what ends up happening is that I start counting the beats from the bar line because I can't see which beat am I just hovering my mouse over right now which is kind of silly and that really slows down my MIDI work. So I hope they address this quickly. I have already reported an issue in Ardor bug tracker about this. Also another interesting thing that they mention in their release notes is that they've been revamping the very speed playback. Very speed is the functionality of dynamically changing the speed of audio playback so you can use Ardor like a tape machine like sloping stuff. Speed them up. Play them backwards. And they said that before it wasn't very flexible and now what they've done is revamped it and made it better so that possibly in the future Ardor could be sample rate agnostic. Just like audacity. Because you see right now if you create an Ardor session that Ardor session is going to be created with a determined sample rate and that's going to be the sample rate that you set up in your audio interface when you create the session. So for example if your jack server is running at 48kHz and you created session that session will be created with 48kHz. And all audio that you record in it will be sampled at 48kHz. And all audio that you bounce and all the processing inside will be at 48kHz. If you ever want to import a file at a different sample rate than that sample rate of your session it will have to be re-sampled before it can be imported or it will play back at the wrong speed. Which I think is understandable because having the program like re-sample all audio files on the fly is probably going to be CPU intensive. For example that's why I would not record my audio into FLAC files directly and then playback from FLAC files because that would require quite a lot of CPU power. You know maybe it's not much when we're talking about 1, 3 tracks but when you start going with 40, 50 tracks it's probably going to end up pretty quickly and maybe it's better to just use more disk space and a dumb PCM format like WAV instead of using that smart FLAC compression but forcing the CPU to do more work. However that's interesting they have also enabled FLAC as a format for all the audio interchange which I think it's cool to be able to do because maybe sometimes you're very low on hard disk space but you have plenty of processing power and you can do that. I haven't tested it, don't know how it works, don't know how it performs, might be cool. Another nice thing is that you can finally import and export MP3s, yay! About the sample rate independency, I think that would be really cool if we could just stop caring about sample rates. The biggest problem I have with this is that if you create an order session, for example I work on 48 kHz and I want to send my project to someone else and collaborate with them and they work in 44.1. Now they have to stop their jack server and start at a different sample rate to be able to open up my project without everything going completely sideways. This part is not gonna work anymore. I'm looking forward to that but well they just said that they laid groundwork so it's not a feature that's already there. Okay I think that's enough for this video. Go to ardor.org and check out the detailed release notes. Let me know if you already knew that Ardor 6 is out or if you didn't know. By the way I have an Ardor 6 quick start guide, it's gonna be a longer video showing the process of starting Ardor for the first time and creating a short project, a short podcast project I would say, from start to finish. So I think that should be pretty helpful for new users. What are you doing? It's go time! Oh, I forgot. Thanks for watching and also big thanks to all the people who support my work financially. If you dear viewer would also like to join them and help keep this show going, please go to patreon.com slash anfa or liberapay.com slash anfa where you can give me a buck or two every month.  Bye.


Today, we're taking a look at the alien hissing xenomorph an illustrated book with sound so stay tuned All right guys welcome back to Comic-Ed and TV We're all geek culture collides and if you're new to the channel make sure you hit that subscribe button So you don't miss out on future videos Today we're taking a look at the alien hissing xenomorph with sound and illustrated book. I believe this came out In 2016, maybe it was 2017. I'm not 100% sure said on Amazon 2016, but I've seen other reviews on YouTube that are saying 2017 I got this for $11 on Amazon According to the description on Amazon The xenomorph is back. This one-of-a-kind kit features a xenomorph bust figure with pop-out Remandable head and hissing sound at the push of a button it must have collectible for fans of the cult film series The kit also includes a 48-page book featuring quotes and full-color photos from the original 1979 alien film the dimensions of the alien four inches by 1.75 in Width the four inches of this is the length 1.75 is the width three inches as the height so Let's take a look at this box guys As you can see here, you got the alien with its inner mandible coming out Got some alien eggs there and please forgive my voice guys I've been sick past few weeks. That's why it's been so difficult getting these new videos out to you It's by running press Deluxe mega kit This kit features a bust figure of an alien xenomorph equipped with a retractable inner mandible and Hissing sound effects the kit also includes a 48 page book featuring quotes and full-color photos from the 1979 alien film not intended for children Replaceable batteries included the visit us on the web www.runningpress.com a Trademark copyright 2016 20th century Fox Film Corporation all rights reserved total 95 in the USA 1615 candidates 799 in UK, so let's go ahead and open this guy up All right, so first things first Does come with instructions here to activate sound push down upon spiked lever on the xenomorph's back No, do not mix old and new batteries Good to know Here's the little mini book Just to give you guys an idea of how big this book is It is exactly three inches tall By two and a half inches wide So it's pretty tiny alien remembering a classic Rob Pearlman You got the face hugger on the front there on the back.  All right, so the introduction I'm not gonna read it It's just too much for my voice right now guys in space. No one can hear you scream Got some nice pictures from the movie Nice pictures of the models they used Not bad Pretty decent. I got this for my father-in-law for Christmas He's a big alien fan In fact, his favorite I believe is aliens always quoting Hicks Game over man game over our Hudson My wife tells me Hudson in the background so here's the aliens you know more bust and Show you the size of it See if they're Correct it is about Three inches tall about an inch and a half wide that way and About four inches long on the head. It's pretty small and To operate it push down on this part here and as you can see it is the clear domed skull see the eye Sockets there Pretty cool. I really like the look of it. It does look like HR Geiger's alien The spines on the back are kind of a rubbery softer plastic Not really sure Kind of where the arms socket where the arms are supposed to go Kind of reminds me of Suction cup Stick to a wall or something, but it won't you got alien there on the bottom very nice detail this ones like a Rubbery plastic as well It is a lot smaller than I anticipated guys. I won't lie Yeah, I didn't really look at the description beforehand really to get the Size and everything but I was expecting it to be a little bit bigger. Maybe Four or five inches tall But still this is good for like a desk or just Sit on the shelf This little booklet is a nice addition So if you like what you see here feel free go ahead and go on to Amazon or Onto Or onto running press calm pick you one up you can get them for about 11 bucks on Amazon That's after tax So yeah, I'm Shannon for come again TV.


All right. Welcome in. We are recording. This is our sandbox review from January 11th.  All right. Well, just before we started recording, we were talking about confidential containers and confidential computing. Because it seems like there's three applications related to confidential computing, interestingly all simultaneous. And we were saying that we don't know whether or not any of these projects have been suggested to the confidential computing consortium, or that's what it's called, isn't it? Is it correct? It is confidential computing consortium. Yes. The ego and marble run seem to be attached to the hip from some of the comments in there. The confidential containers one looks as though it's pretty related to Cata. Now, remind me where Cata lives. Open stack land. Terrible, terrible idea of theirs. Always was a mistake. So should we skip those three and just go to the second one, which is cloud we go. I think unless anyone has any particular reason to prioritize them, it would be worth finding out whether that's, because I guess it's another one of those areas where if we start opening up the door, so lots of confidential computing. Did we already do something there? It came in last time around. And how can we explain why there's so many new ones? How can projects update this information? Should they update it on the spreadsheet or? Yeah, we'll reach out. One, we'll reach out. Two, they can come back in and put comments on the spreadsheet. I think if I look at ego, it's an SDK, which is, you know, arguably this is more go oriented than cloud native. So I think that would be another question mark in my mind. You know, it's not something that people necessarily just run. Marble run does appear to be very Kubernetes centric. So the ego also says, talk something about a modified go compiler. And that's scary to me. Yeah, it's, I mean, you kind of have to modify the runtime, which basically means modifying the compiler because it goes not very friendly to adding platforms out of tree. Which has always been a little bit of a problem with doing it, working with go like this. That is definitely giving me cause for concern about whether ego really fits. It's also MPL too. So they have a small licensing change to do. Well, they won't be able to re-license go. So yeah, that would be a problem. Okay, that sounds pretty, pretty conclusively like ego should probably try to find a different home. Yep. Confidential computing foundation. We word that nicely, but those three, like, we'll reach out and see if this is really the right home for them. Well, yeah. I feel like ego. It isn't a case of them saying, oh no, we actually like CNCF better because I think even then for ego specifically, they've got a licensing issue. Changing the go run time sounds quite. This is interesting that they both come from edgeless sis. So does mobile run depend on ego? Not sure. So that would be another question to ask them. It does. I just looked up their code model really quick. So yeah. And they also have mentioned it in the, why do you want to contribute to the CNCF? Ego sister project marble and compliments the strategy because marble run is the control plane for confidential workloads kind of thing. So it could be that the ego might go to confidential computing and then marble run might end up with us. I love the branding for marble run here the service mesh for concept confidential computing. Love it. All right. Should we move on to cloud we go. A little bit like micro. Thanks. We have that SDK or something that was bringing dotnet stuff. Sound similar to that. But go lang. Did we accept it? I think I might have been the person who voted against it. Yeah, yeah, we didn't. It's from bite sounds. Yeah, so it probably runs at decent scale. But is middleware. Do you consider g rpc middleware? No, I consider g rpc and networking protocol. This feels very opinionated.  Well, I don't know what. Yeah. Yeah.  Again, I am not some of them are. Yeah. Yeah, but this feels like programming SDKs rather than cloud native projects to me. And I think there's a whole question of, you know, go libraries that are higher performance or more specialized than the go standard libraries, but I'm not sure that CNCF is necessarily the right home for them. So, does anybody want to vote for cloud we go. I'm inclined to water and say no. That would be my vote as well. No, and we'd like to better understand it or just know all together. Yeah, for me to know. Yeah, we, we, a long time ago we voted no or didn't vote in the end I think on as many years ago and I'll socket. Which was in a way kind of similar kind of middle wary thing that arguably even more crowded. And I think we've basically not we I mean we never accepted a project like that so far and I think we have not accepted some in the past. Well, maybe for the clarity of giving them an answer we should do about I shall put. Fairly inclusive. Okay, open policy registry. Wonder what the C stands for. Is there any reason why this is different from like why you'd have a policy registry rather than a general. I think the OCI registries were intending to be kind of general purpose not just for container images. I think they have some tools to build to see our effects with the policies inside my client side tools. So some backstory here. This is from a company called assertive. We want to do cloud native authorization as a service. So they're building a framework UI and those kinds of things for doing that. One of the components is this registry when they want to repurpose any harbor or whatever registries at as the place where you would store policies. So that then they can do Docker pull push kind of things for pulling the policy and then executing it. Which I thought you already could with with OCI registries. I mean, yeah, you can I mean that's is it I'm going to try and work out if it's a, I think that I think it's. It is using a normal registry but it's running a command line that's specialized for pulling and pushing policies, I think. Right. Yep, that's what it looks like it's doing. I think that P column P tells you how it's they're saying that this is a meta project that brings together three science of technologies OPA cosine OCI. And for each of them they've given like how they are doing it or what they are doing there. So they're just trying to formalize things. Both the code as well as they might be doing some specifications I guess. One thing I'm going to say is that the looking at the the repose I mean policy has 19 stars. That appears to be the most popular. In one question for me would be OPA has accepted sub projects in the past, right there's gatekeeper. I think that came from Microsoft, you know is there a reason they're not trying to go that route. So potentially or as, which is registry as storage. Yeah, potentially could take sub projects that are specific registry as storage as well I mean I think. That's a good idea. Yeah. Yes, I think that makes more. Yeah we should ask them to explore those two options. I don't know. It's like lemonade for all the letters jumbled up. Not very clear how it is cloud native. The application doesn't mention it. The, why do you want to contribute is a bit fluffy. We'd love to share our vision with others and meet contributors who are crazy enough to think that good ideas need to be shared with the world I mean that just sounds like. You've decided open source is a good idea. It's not very CNCF specific. No, and it's also just easy integration into enterprise software. So it's a little weird from column J to. And it's two, it's two people and six stars. One fork. Watches. Do we want to vote on it as cloud native or should we go say go away explain why your cloud native build up a community come back if you still want to join. Yeah, you could recommend LFAI to as an alternative organization. You got that Amy. Sure did carry on. Cool. Okay boot. Sort of sets up my sets of my opinionated kind of pulling building blocks together along bells. Also not clear whether it's from an individual or an organization for booting VMs running microservices which is to be honest, quite strange. A couple of clicks brought me to point gold.io and that's two people. Sorry.  Yeah. Yeah, so maybe it's one contributor really one of them's only got two commits. Yeah, maybe it's unclear how it's really cloud native and needs more community. Should we move on to dev file. This is a red hat one. Alternative to get hubs proprietary. What's it called code spaces thing. Is it. I think I think that's, I think that's, that was the intention. I'm catching up on my notes. Now that makes it quite interesting. I'm not sure this is, I mean, the, the code space when it's not very proprietary, it's just not very good. It's just something someone hacked together in an afternoon that it's more, I mean, it's just, it wasn't really designed to be a standard. It was just something that was convenient to, to, for someone to hack together an afternoon, I think. But it's being used. It has got apparently support from red hat and I WS and IBM and somebody else. Jet brains. Yeah. I like the idea. I like the idea. Do we have other things that we consider like developer optimization tooling that falls into the same thing or. Well, there was that DS code extensions. Yeah. So it feels somewhat similar. Yeah, we do have specs. So it's not like specs are not a new thing for CNCF. Should we do votes for this? Anyone got any other comments or we've got three more minutes. Can we just deal with a marble run instead of picking another one. Okay. What did you want to say about mobile run? Like this, if we have to go back to the edge less as folks, we gave them some feedback about ego. Do you want to give feedback about the model run? It's, it's a pair. Ego is a dependency of it. Well, although there has some other. Just say another runtime. I'm not familiar with any of those other runtimes. Well, another one of them comes from the same people. We've got the same RTSRT is which is built on top of open long-laid but from the edge of the systems. So an open enclave is confidential computing foundation project. So it's another runtime that they build. So the question of whether or not they've spoken to confidential computing console. They're a member of it. So I guess they have. I don't know. I mean, yeah, I can see the, you know, there's a more direct line between this and cloud native with it being Kubernetes kind of flavored. I guess the feedback would be, let's see what happens with the ego and then we'll deal with this one. That's fine. We're nearly at time as well. Looks good. Yeah. All right. So we got through about nine of them. Good for first, first meeting of the year.


Fear and worry, there's a question that I encourage us to ask in all these situations is in any given situation of what is the potential for fear. Fear is the emotion, more than any other which which drives us into anxiety, depression, stress. If we can tackle fear from all fronts then we're in a better position and fear really has as three main components to it. There's fear of humiliation, often which is about inside losing face or losing my identity or losing who I am fear of social disconnection fear of isolation and fear of death, which is maybe literal or metaphorical, but from a metaphorical perspective it may be about loss of role, loss of direction, loss of purpose, loss of who I am.