Oh, I just start recording and sure enough so plan today work through some examples I'll take questions from the review.  It's going to be hey I'm around come on in if you have questions, okay? And the reason is you guys are actually a couple of days ahead of my other blocks if I did a tutorial Monday after school My other blocks One of my blocks is going to be doing torques The latter question on Monday, so I wouldn't really have finished the unit. They would have just seen it all, okay? Uniform 15 kilogram pipe Of length blah blah blah has a hundred and sixty newtons of force applied four meters from its lower end as shown Using the point where the pipe touches the ground as a pivot Calculate the sum of the torques acting on the pipe So I'm looking at this one Justin. I don't think this one is in equilibrium I think what it's telling me is it's moving figure out what direction and what's the torque So I'm still gonna start out by saying perpendicular components. I'm gonna list all of my torques I think but this time I Don't think we're going to get equal Okay, a little bit of twist here What are the forces acting on this beam get the obvious ones? Okay, so there's going to be the center of mass right here and it's in screen frozen. I'm sorry There we go. Let's try that I hit that button. Thank you there's going to be the center of mass right here and Yeah, looking at my answers, I'm sure there's an unbalanced torque because they're saying what is the sum of the torques and it's not zero Mg and then we have Tension I think for this one what I'll do is I'll calculate Oh, there's more forces, but I think the rest are right there and since this isn't a written question I'm not going to freak out about getting the free body diagram right at multiple choice I want to cut corners be a bit of a rush what I'm going to do is I'll figure out the Clockwise torque from this I'll figure out the counterclockwise torque from this and I think I'll go bigger minus smaller Is the remaining difference? What's left over because I think clockwise and counterclockwise you can kind of think of them as opposites That's positive and negative numbers like we've done with other forces, but in this case. It's torques. We have to go components Mg perpendicular and Tension perpendicular Angles angles angles angles Jun Jun There's a Z. So this right here is 42 degrees No, I'm writing on top of the number that doesn't help you guys at all. That's right here is 42 degrees and Okay, the trick here for this 34 Imagine this going straight down 90 degrees right there 34 there so these two add to 90 56 and these two add to 90 You know the 34 ends up there and you probably noticed That when you have something on an angle the bottom angle ends up in the triangle right there You may have spotted that but I still walk through it because there's all sorts of weird diagrams out there Remember the one we did on the take-home quiz yesterday number three had the tension going in kind of a weird direction That was a tough one So I'm gonna say this The torques clockwise in that direction equal Mg perpendicular times its distance from the pivot how far oh Pipe is five meters long 2.5 and you'll notice again here Dylan here I didn't go some of the torques clockwise equal some of the torques counterclockwise because I looked at my answers And I said oh, they're telling me my net torque is not zero. It's not balanced. So I'm gonna find each one bigger minus smaller Which trig function relates mg perpendicular and mg You probably noticed most of the time when you're dealing with gravity it ends up being cosine The only time that wouldn't is if they didn't give you that angle if they gave you a different weird angle somewhere else and Could happen. So I haven't said to you memorize gravity as cosine, but it's been cosine almost all the time So I think this ends up being m g cosine of 34 Times 2.5 the clockwise torques ends up being math 12s make sure you're in degrees My in degrees I am The clockwise torques ends up being m 15 times g 9.8 times coasts 34 Times 2.5 and I get 304.67 What are the units for torque but can't be newtons newtons is force. This is not force Torque is what times what? force times perpendicular distance it is Newton meters, but that's not joules like it used to be um, oh Let's do Counterclockwise torques. I'll do that over here. So the torques Counterclockwise which is in that direction. I'm pretty sure that's tension perpendicular times. How far is it from the pivot? You have to do a bit of arithmetic Right in yeah for how our tension perpendicular and F Related and I think you've noticed that Most of the time not always but most of the time for tension which trig function has it been usually So this one ends up being tension sign of 42 Times 4 the torques counterclockwise ends up being Tension hundred and sixty sign 42 Times 4 And I get four hundred and twenty eight point two four Big sneeze online Again Newton meters, which one's bigger because these aren't balanced this time which one's bigger That Wrong wrong Yeah, Gord said it see I hope you didn't actually pull out your calculator Hopefully you glanced at the answers and said oh, yeah about a hundred and twenty as opposed to actually crunching the numbers So see so there is an example of a can I call that a curveball not exactly? But Kellen although I think there is one like that somewhere in your review now that I think about it I think there was one where it simply said find them find the net torque and it wasn't zero But hopefully you're getting comfortable now with components and beams at angles turn the page a Student stands on a uniform 25 kilogram beam. Oh Another late person have to pause my lesson So we've seen diagrams like this before clearly a beam Two things on the end and a mass in the middle the only twist here is instead of saying find the force on the Left or the force on the right or both of them say find the mass of the student, okay? Thankfully, it's a horizontal beam that makes things way easier because when it comes to gravity that's gonna mean no components It's gonna be perpendicular So we're gonna start out. I'm going to assume this beam is an equilibrium. They got a woman standing on there Let's assume if it was spinning she wouldn't be standing on there What are the forces acting on this beam get the obvious ones? gravity where Okay, and that's the mass of the beam I'll call that mass of the beam times G. What else? Mass of the student ms times G What else? Okay, this it's telling me the scale is feeling the beam pushing down at 350 newtons now we're not drawing the force on the scale But if the beam is pushing down at 350 newtons forces come in what? So there must be an upwards force right there of 350 newtons and I could call it normal force but since they gave me a number I'll just put the number there one less variable to deal with if that's okay, Evan and There's also I'm sure a force up right here And that's a problem because there's two things I don't know the mass of the student and this force or it would be if I tried solving this using forces By saying everything up equals everything down But with torques of course Evan, I'll put my pivot right there Gets rid of one unknown force Is that okay? Good try this on your own I'll freeze my screen see if you can figure out as a little twist what the mass of the student has to be no components But it's gonna be the some of all torques clockwise equals some of all torques counterclockwise When you're done, let's look up. You can look up. I'll unfreeze my screen every so often We're just trying the second question on our own and then I'll unfreeze my screen see if you can get it What was the mass of the beam? 25, thank you See if you get what I got.  By the way, I find Justin in all honesty The top of the fraction is always complicated enough that you may have noticed I used to always just put everything on the top and brackets everything in the bottom and brackets more and more when I'm typing On my calculator in this unit. I do the whole top I press equals and Then I just divide by the bottom. I It I found it was too many brackets to consistently Easily keep track of and because you're almost always only dividing by one thing or at the most in this case two things I figured and I'm not gonna worry about brackets so much I'll just type in the whole top enter and then divide by whatever's on the bottom enter So I did that here. I did top line got six hundred eighty two and then I divided by nine point eight times one point two 58 yeah, okay. I probably If I was in a rush would have crossed out D anyways because 89 kilograms. That's a pretty heavy student person That's a football player weight. So Message for this question Kellen is on your test. I won't always say find the tension or find the force I may say hey find the mass that's gonna find the mass of the beam would be an interesting one. Okay, or Find the weight of the beam, which would be mg of the beam that would be an interesting one But I don't always just have to define tension Turn the page I Like number three. I like number three. I like number three. I like number three number three is a nice question I like number three. This is about as tough as I can ask you. I think says this a Six meter uniform beam of mass 32 kilograms is suspended horizontally by a hinged end in the cable a 93 kilogram object is connected to one end of the beam and that wants me to find the force on the hinge Now the real answer here is I can't find the force on the hinge directly I think what I'll try and find is it's horizontal component It's vertical component. I'll add those together tip to tail and I'll find a resultant, but to do that That do a lot of torques and you can see seven marks. This actually was from a provincial. I think this was from the 2001 Provincial I think so this is also considered fair game now it was one of the tough questions that year So there were other easier written questions as well I think the written question on energy was a straight roller coaster heat question, which was almost plug-and-chug So, okay Hmm suggestions, I have no idea what you're saying. I Think I'm gonna put the pivot right there. I Agree and then what? Let's label our forces. Okay The beam has mass by the way every once in a while to make the question easier They'll say the mass of the beam is negligible They'll go to our magic physics world and give you a massless beam to give you one less torque to deal with I've seen that happen. I don't think I did all the tests, but in case And that's gonna go center of mass right about Mass of the beam times G What are the forces? tension Like the feeling you get when you haven't done all the homework next What else You're missing an obvious. Oh, sorry. Yeah, okay. Yeah, I got this one I'll call it mass of the load times G Or you call it MO for object whatever just some way that you can keep them straight in your equation, right? That can't be it why can't that be it? Which way is tension pulling what two directions? Up I'm okay with because up could possibly cancel out those guys, but what Megan also to the Okay, it's pulling to the left There has to be a force to the right right there and I've called that usually fx for horizontal And I'm almost positive Jordan that there's also a vertical component right there I'm pretty sure when you hang something that yeah the tension is carrying most of the mass But right here it's taking care of some of gravity, too How far are both of these from the pivot zero so they're not going to give me any torque I got to do one more thing before I can start I like this I like this Yeah What am I going to have to do with tension components perpendicular and parallel And this time tension parallel is going to become important You know why Gordon It's equal to fx. In fact, I can't find fx Can't But I can find tension pair parallel and And Say they're equal. In fact, I'm not going to find tension at all. I'm going to find perpendicular Which is going to help me find fy. I'm going to find parallel which is going to help me find fx tension itself in this question Not useful Because it's at an angle and everything else is componentized if that's a word so Let's see The sum of all the torques clockwise Equals the sum of all the torques counterclockwise And I'll continue down here Clockwise clockwise clockwise. Oh these two The mass of the beam times g times its distance from the pivot Now before we go further look up everyone The only reason it's three is because the pivot is at the end What if the pivot was right there? I'm just making that up. What would the distance be? The reason I'm saying that is there is somewhere on your test going to be one Where I don't put the pivot at the end and one of the most common mistakes kids just look at the length of the beam Oh, uh, distance is four if it's eight meters long or it's a 10 meter long. The distance is five Well, only if the pivot was right at the end and it's not it's just to the right of the center Is a matter or just to the left of the center. So just make sure you think Uh, but this one is definitely going to be three And then we have mass of the load times g times its distance from the pivot Which is definitely six because it's end to end And that equals tension perpendicular Times how far is it from the pivot? You know what I'm going to do since I want to find tension perpendicular I'm going to divide by four on this line. I almost never do that, but I'm scared. I'm going to run out of a room here Okay In fact, I can almost go to my calculator now because I know mass of the beam and I know mass of the load So why not? Of course, as soon as I open my calculator, I cover up the data 32 and 93. Okay 32 times 9.8 times three and 93 times 9.8 times six And just and like I said what I've often started doing because they're long yucky fractions I just hit equals divide by four And my right is tension perpendicular 16 oh two point three Someone else get that too. Okay, and I'm not going to round off because this is not final answer 16 oh two point three and this is tension. So newtons.  Now I'm more you got 60, you know too as well folks What does that mean? For me Well, I think it means that this is pulling down, but that doesn't make physics sense to me Let me think here for a second. I mean it's possible You could have tension so tight that this would be pulling down But that would be if you were like pulling that way really really really really hard If you're pulling this way, I think it would want to rotate still um Have I done something silly here? mass of the beam I stole this from a provincial so the numbers should be good Sorry Well, it's it's Gordon what was that? You're saying maybe this is so heavy on this end That the rope pulling up is it's so heavy over here that it wants to spin this way And so this is having to push down and that's brilliant if I can convince myself that that's right Have I made a mistake somewhere you got did you get 602 as well? What do I have sorry Because we want to find the force on the hinge, which is going to be that plus that Ha Yann who reads English better than me bless your heart She says all they want is the horizontal force not the vertical force not the combined force I should have read the question carefully. I thought fh. I read it really quick stood for f hinge, but they want the horizontal force don't they? So do I need to find f y No, gordon actually a long time ago already told us mr. Dewick. I know what the horizontal force is What's the horizontal force? How big is fx? You told me what it was the same size as quite a while ago Uh not perpendicular parallel what I need to do is say this uh And I bet you they didn't care about the rest of the numbers Which is why we were getting a bizarre torque going down fair enough fx equals Tension perpendicular parallel you got me doing it now. I don't know tension parallel. I know perpendicular Okay, so that's 48 degrees up there see the z. How are these two related salvage this mr. Dewick 10 yes 10 of 48 equals perpendicular over parallel so that means that tension parallel is going to be perpendicular divided by 10 48 mr. Dewick read the question properly The horizontal component fx or fh for horizontal is going to be this divided by that It's going to be 16.0 16 or 2.3 divided by tan You know what I'll leave this lesson online Just as a humility exercise so my kids know that I still make mistakes Of course that means people from other schools and across the province or watch. Ah I make mistakes get over it uh 1442 1443 oh sig figs 1.44 times 10 to the Thank you. Yeah third newtons Okay, and you know what then I'll revise this from an a plus question to an a minus question I would consider this this I would consider fair game Two more we're done Two more three more we're done This here is about as difficult as the torques can get because we have the beam not horizontal We have the tension at a different angle from the beam Okay, in fact, I gave you one this is similar to what we did on the quiz on the last question Except there I had the beam coming down from the ceiling, but it was the same idea the rope and the beam were all at different angles so Do you guys want to try this one on your own or do you want me to do this? Tyler shook his head. You want to try this on your own? You want me to do this? Do we do it together? Okay, let's walk through it This is fair game one of these Six of these no one of these Six meter uniform beam of mass 25 kilograms is suspended by a cable as shown 85 kilogram object hangs on one end. What's the tension in the cable? Okay Force is acting on the beam The mass of the beam times g the mass of the load times g tension Oh, and there's probably a vertical and a horizontal, but who cares because there's zero from the pivot Remember I said sometimes they give you a different angle Most of the time they've given us the bottom angle this time. They gave us the top one. Okay Let's first of all draw in our components There's the mass of the beam g perpendicular Parallel there's the mass of the load g perpendicular parallel There's tension perpendicular Parallel and you'll notice because I'm not using the parallel I didn't even bother labeling them because it's less to think about Okay, the top triangle here isn't too bad. I'm going to extend it though. So I don't run into stuff the top triangle here Isn't too bad because as I look at this this angle here is 67 degrees. I see a zen. Okay ready Let me make this nice and big Let me make this nice and big. I thought I said see the zed see it So how big? 75 what do these two add together to? Now you could either go There's a zed here, which means this is 75 and then say there's another zed here, which means That's 75 which is going to give us a different angle for a change Okay Or you could say that's 75 if you want it to have the angle at the top so you could use cosine again then this would be Be what? 15 which one you want to do. I don't care That's 75. So that means That's 75 down there and that's 75 down there And that didn't turn off Try that again that's 75 down there and that's 75 down there two zeds Not a nice twist. Is that okay? You guys follow how I how we got that? All right, if you're really not sure Extend lines at horizontals and verticals and level with the beams and eventually you'll be able to hopscotch your way there I have the advantage because I can turn that eraser thing on and off so I can mark up the diagram and have everything vanish um If you're really not sure redraw part of the diagram often the margins somewhere and mark that one up like crazy Until you find the angle and then transfer it back to your nicer diagram Uh, what's the oh tension uh torques mr. Dewick torques we say The sum of all the torques clockwise that's in that direction Equals the sum of all the torques counterclockwise. That's in that direction Which force or forces could cause it to spin clockwise? I think the masses so we have mass of the beam g perpendicular times its distance from the pivot plus mass of the load g perpendicular times its distance from the pivot Three and six Right center of mass and right at the end and that equals Clock counterclockwise tension perpendicular times its distance from the pivot uh six mr. Dewick. No How far is tension from the pivot four? Trig I'll use this triangle because it's bigger this one's small and yucky But this one's nice and big and they're identical triangles so whatever trig function I do here is going to be the same one here. Which trig function am I going to use here? Yeah, this time it's sine So for both of these it's going to be mass of the beam g sine 75 Times three plus mass of the load g sine 75 Times six Equals and I'll do the trig for perpendicular at the very very end because that's too much trig But I am just going to divide by four on this line and get the perpendicular by itself because it's my last step I got room good Tension perpendicular is going to end up being what was the mass of the beam 25 and 85 25 times 9.8 sine 75 times three plus 85 times 9.8 sine 75 Times it was six right all divided by four Justin once again, I'll type in the entire top line probably and just press enter and then divide by four 25 times 9.8 times sine 75 closes bracket times three plus 85 times 9.8 times sine 75 closed bracket times six I'll divide it by four You get 1384.413 blah blah blah okay So tension perpendicular is 1384 Newtons And I have room over here and I'm running out of room at the bottom so I'll move over I want to find tension In this triangle how are perpendicular and tension related? Which trig function?  So I'll just divide that by sine of 67 1500 1500 Newtons Hey Okay Two more we're done A 0.75 kilogram board of length 2.6 meters Initially rests on two supports as shown So it's just sitting there. It's not nailed down What maximum distance x from the right hand support can a 1.2 kilogram bird walk Before the board begins to leave the left hand support in other words How far to the right can that bird walk before the whole thing flips over? Oh Little twist because here we're being asked to find the distance Definitely a beam. Yes Definitely torques. Yes How are we going to start out? How have we started out almost every torque question?  Ah, okay. Definitely going to notice that. What are the forces acting here? Get the obvious ones Okay, and that looks about center of meh. Well, you know clothes. I don't care Probably really over here. But anyways mass of the beam times g what else ty? bird Ooh, I got b for beam and b for bird. I'll call it m1 g Pretty heavy bird 1.2 kilos That's a That's a big bird Uh, can this be an equilibrium right now? No because all my forces are down. There's got to be some upwards forces Where? Well, I think right there we would have I'll call that fr for fright Now how big is this force if we're just starting to tip? zero There if he's further this way, I'm sure it's pushing up taking some of the mass of the plank But if it's just starting to tip if we're just starting to begin to tip What we're really saying here, Justin is the force on this has just become zero and now it's ready to pivot around there So I'm going to make a little note here The force is zero because we're just starting to tip that makes sense That that's the extra little bit of reasoning we have to do here. Gilemon torx Um Where am I going to put my pivot? I think I'm going to put my pivot right here because I don't know this force The sum of all the torx clockwise Equals the sum of all the torx counterclockwise Clockwise so if that's my pivot, what could cause it to spin clockwise? Don't use red mr. Do it. It's so black M1g times how far is it from the pivot? Oh That's what we're trying to find. There's my x equals What could cause it to spin counterclockwise? mass of the beam times g times Okay, I'm going to have to do some math here. How far is it from the pivot? How long is the beam grand total? 2.6 and that is that far right center of mass is This distance here 1.3 How's that help? Well, let's see What's this total distance here? What's the total distance here? Tyler 1.8 and how far do I want to be from the end? 1.3 so how far am I from here?  So I said, okay whole thing center of mass right there Oh 1.8 1.3 So 0.5 Oh, this is actually an easy question to solve Five marks. Well, the key is realizing that because you're about to tip this is going to be zero I saw this question a similar one like this a few years ago A lot of kids wanted to put a force right here because they were Up they wanted one more torque So we're going to have this x equals The mass of the beam times g times 0.5 divided by m1 g as it turns out Unusually what cancels Not the masses because they're different masses what cancels Yeah, what we're saying is This would work on the moon as well. It's the same distance on the moon is on the earth Or the same distance on maras as on the earth or jupiter as on the earth We get Hopefully I get a positive answer Uh 0.75 times Let's see here 0.75 times 0.5 divided by 1.2 0.3125 so 0.312 or 0.31 0.31 meters does that make sense that's reasonable Certainly the answer can't be bigger than 2.6 because that's the length of the beam So yeah, it seems good b What force does the right hand support exert on the board at that instant? Oh What force is right here? How many marks is this worth? I think f up equals f down I think It's gotta be because for two marks jordan I don't think they want me to pull out torques or move a pivot or for two marks I think those are usually kind of plug-and-chug uh mass of the beam 0.7 0.75 times 9.8 plus 1.2 times 9.8 19.1 newtons Would the force be changing? Yeah as the bird moves It's changing the torques the force on each of these beams will be changing in fact as the bird moves left The force here would be going up because as it moves right it hits zero And then you can even almost think about when it starts to tip the force here is sort of negative It's pushing it up and away because it's going to spin So yeah number six Very similar to number five In that it looks like they're asking me to find A distance By the way see the font has changed that tells you this was from the 80s Before they had computers printing these up when they actually used to use physical type printing press machine Says consider the bar a b to have negligible mass. Oh There there's our magic bar with no mass How far from point a must a downward force Of 40.5 newtons be applied In order to achieve rotational equilibrium Good question Which side has more mass on it? Which side has more torque on it? Well, the nice thing is because we're horizontal. I can really quickly figure this out This side i'm assuming that's my pivot has that times that torque five times 2.1 10.5 This side has 3.5 times 4.3 Which side has more torque? Which side needs help then Okay, you know what I just figured out by doing that the force is somewhere here Except can I draw it like this instead because this is how we're used to seeing it mystery force f That's the distance A needs some help It could be further over. I don't know but I know it's to the left of the pivot That was my first thing I wanted to figure out By the way, if I guessed wrong if I'd put it to the right of the pivot I would know because when I tried to crunch the numbers I'd get a negative distance and that would say goofed Start over other side Now I think though this is almost similar Maybe even a little bit easier to the previous question. We're going to find a distance Oh, what are the forces acting on this beam get the obvious ones? I'll call it ma g mb g And wonderfully enough Are these all perpendicular? No components It's almost straight plug and chug. Uh, let's start out the sum of all the torques clockwise in this direction Equals the sum of all the torques counterclockwise in that direction clockwise clockwise 3.5 times 9.8 Times 4.3 Right mg times its distance from the pivot equals Counterclockwise counterclockwise. By the way, I skipped the step. Normally I wrote the variables, but I can tell you guys It's tight. You're tired. It's been a long class. So I stuck the numbers in right away as well. Is that okay? Counterclockwise, I would never do this on a test I'd always show the extra work because you don't want to do the sloppy mistake counterclockwise ma g uh five Times 9.8 times its distance from the pivot plus 40.5 was that kilograms or newtons So do I need to multiply it by 9.8? Nope 40.5 times x And I think I said to you at the very beginning of this unit one of the things I like about this unit the setup is tough But the equations you get at the end are usually pretty easy to solve I mean the most we've been doing is dividing by a number or two or subtracting something over but nothing really really high tech It's going to be this minus that answer divided by 40.5 3.5 times 9.8 times 4.3 minus 5 times 9.8 times 2.1 divided by 40.5 1.1 By the way, what could not my answer be bigger than 2.1. So this is built in error checks as well 1.1 seems pretty good almost worked out bang even that makes me think Oh, I bet you that's where they put it to start out to do the math So I think I'm right The last thing I think I'm Again, my brain works weird when I calculated very quickly the torque here and the torque here I think I went mass times distance. I don't think I included the 9.8 I don't think I included the 9.8 not that it made a difference in terms of figuring out which one was bigger But I should have Yeah, oh how far from point a Ah Someone else can read better than me. So if x is 1.1, how far from point a Therefore 1.0 meters from point a Currently I didn't drink coffee this morning But I hope that kind of helped to crystallize details kind of locked in what we're going. Okay, and there's your test You can think about what kind of using principles of physics right to explain questions there might be There are some good suggestions or some good hints in your big review package some of the ones that are there Easy to tweak and give you as well I'm going to hit stop the rest of the class is yours to work on the review


Hi everyone. Happy new release day. Happy Valentine's Day. Thanks for showing Jaspie's and 2024 tops series one a little love today on Valentine's Day. This is pick your team five six-fox jumbo Brand new release just dropped today First look at 2024 stuff, which is awesome There you go. Very big. Thanks everyone here for getting into pick your team five. Appreciate you And it was Michael last spot mojo with the Nationals 70% of the time last spot mojo hits 100% of the time. So they say Here's a jumbo case right here This camera right here as well Who's going to Disneyland? My homes is it. All right. All right six jumbo boxes Just adjusting some camera settings here. All right. See all the boxes right over there And good luck. So what are we looking for it here? We're looking for one autograph and two relic cards in Every hobby and in every hobby jumbo box. These are jumbo boxes. I don't know about you guys But I really I really like the design of these cards this year I like the neon sort of look that's happening here It's a very distinct look series one is usually pretty uh I Know I like series, you know series one usually They don't get too adventurous with the design But I like the vibes here Now Jason was mentioning that And I agree with him that the the black borders are gonna make these cards a little bit more difficult grading wise But if you get a PSA 10 Or a bgs 10 out of these You know it's gonna be all the more worth it. I think now as we started this break I think there were three teams left and pick your team six two of which are only twenty dollars So someone could snag those twenty dollar teams and someone will eventually grab the the slightly pricier team Which is the Mets I believe So then we can lock and pick your team six on the schedule because these breaks are gonna be kind of long But we have all day So we should be able to get to most of them tonight All right, so let's roll here some of the key rookies. We're looking for are gonna be Ellie Della Cruz for the Reds of course and then Jason Dominguez for the Yankees Evan Carter for the Rangers Junior Caminero for the Tampa Bay Rays And I think Jason was saying That we're that we're seeing more like relics and not like commemorative Medallion type stuff, which is also a good thing. I think Jonathan with the Braves gets the Acunha junior relic Got celebration of the kid inserts right there Eliz Diaz The 89 design Which is really cool. I think Vet commons do not ship. Yeah, that's what it says the first line of the description was Evan Carter Obviously all rookies will ship all parallels will ship that's to 499 the Andrew Ben intendee All silver pack cards will ship I'll try to catch as many of these key rookies as possible. These these are gonna be the ones that will be top-loaded and Then we've got Owen white Got some cool inserts here There's our first junior Caminero Evan Carter goes to EA and the Rangers EA also gets the junior Camino as he has the rays as well although also be Some randomizing as well Because there are league leaders cards where we'll do some randomizing there, but we'll cross that bridge when we get there Oh, there it is. So these just the base versions of these There's a lot of these so we're gonna evenly distributed between these three teams angels Rangers white socks any foil Or numbered we'll do a separate randomizer for that You know, so like left teams will get all the foil ones or middle or Right, that's a good little process. There's Christian Javier to 2024 These are pretty cool to what he's called Kind of like that blueprint look there Show me the blueprints Show me all the blueprints Christian Javier that's gonna go to mark mark H Everyone remember that reference Show me the blueprints What movie is that from don't Google it? Show me all the blueprints. You got a Ryan Mount castle Piece of the lumber to 199 Camera a little too bright here. Should we roll off the camera a little bit got Raphael Devers? Boba Shet Think for people of a certain age or those 1989 cards are starting to get into some years where Starting to see a lot of familiar designs There's Jason Dominguez base South Freelich Really Tavares. Oh, and there's our first autograph. It's Chas McCormick 2023 postseason autograph. That's mark H with these throws 31 out of 50 postseason performance autograph card No one's now might be a guy to look at this year Now I know we talked about the key rookies right Ellie Evan Jason Dominguez, Junior Caminero, but Guys like Henry Davis players to look out for there's always like a rookie or two I feel like that always that always ends up And always ends up emerging so that's something to look out for as well Spot at least a couple of the other key rookies, so I know what pictures to look for mix and sell gold foil. I guess at the Ellie Della Cruz is is the photo that we're using so for the and There's an Anthony Volpe future stars silver Ellie Della Cruz is in a Kind of a charcoal gray uniform Kind of does it says first card on it that that's kind of cool. Do we like that? There's home run challenge Bryce Harper's will go to the Phillies image variations and super short prints should be flipped around but If not our Our excellent sorting and shipping team will catch those We'll do all the silver packs at the end of the break. All right onwards. Good luck Niners fire defensive coordinator Steve Wilk after one season seems a little early doesn't it? Not the nighter's defense is pretty good. Do you see Wilkson come to UCLA? Be a defensive coordinator Here a chip Kelly did chip Kelly Abandoned UCLA and went to become an offensive coordinator in Ohio State kind of leaving UCLA in the lurch. They should have fired that I mean the Sports director for UCLA catching a lot of heat to I think they they're like why didn't you fire that guy? Last fall. All right next box feel for There's our autograph that's slayed What are you going with Michael on this? Caconi. Yeah, Caconi Pepperoni That's for Ross and the Diamondbacks Again, we'll do a relic and auto recap at the end of the break It's Kenley Jansen, still a free agent. I think Kenley Jansen might be a friend. Dodgers should pick him up for like a season Give him a million dollars Leota Tavares is to 2024. That's for EA and the Rangers Jason Dominguez There's Edwin Diaz should be healthy this year Dominguez all these Dominguezes going to Tristan and the Yankees When's Dominguez coming back? Does anyone know? Jason Dominguez? He got elbow The hitters can come back come back from UCL-ish elbow surgery-ish stuff sooner than their pitching counterparts In the middle of the season. There's a George Springer Home Run Derby Aaron Judge for the Yankees That's a gold foil one. So that will randomize To a specific side left rider center got an Albert Pujols relic Nice one for this Cardinals edition. It's gonna go to Matthew Wood, St. Louis See Martinez rookie silver. That's pretty cool Jackie Robinson Remember that story of the Jackie Robinson statue that was cut down Apparently they made a couple arrests That story apparently they I Guess they were trying to Melt it down for the copper. I guess is they is what they're alleging Nothing more sinister than that. So that's to 499 so that I'll also be part of the left right and center randomizer. I Guess that's a thing these days Or maybe it all it always has been People are like trying to strip copper out of buildings and stuff like that, too There's Ellie Della Cruz Cubs team card. I've seen one of each right. Oh, I need to spot some junior Camineros That's what the Ellie looks like that's to Jason Dominguez that's Evan Carter, that's Jason Dominguez Now there's that junior Camineros. So let's look for a base junior Camineros Spot what his Stance looks like commit that to memory. Maybe I've missed one already But those will all be found and shipped Louisa Ryan is to 2024 and Chris Bryant for the Rockies major league material. He said the lumber game used lumber Going to Matt Arnold and the Rockies Louisa Riaz will go to the Marlins that'll be for Jeremy Kershaw's back for another season possibly to with my dog news But he won't be back until the middle of the season working his way back from a little shoulder surgery But at this stage of his career, he might be one of those like Kind of start him up in the middle of the season and get him ready for postseason kind of kind of guy All right, next box more silver packs I'll do all at the end some of those could be numbered some of those could be autographed There could be some some surprises in there Eric. What's going on doing well doing well All right, how are you? It's getting in on some series one Jason when it was live a little bit early. I came a little bit early to help Jason Now I'm officially In this series one here. We've got some more coming up How's pick your team six looking? Pick your team six still holding at three teams left sub Oliver Marlins nationals are only 20 bucks each and then the Mets 7999 Rest up that back work on that core Eric. I'll keep the back strong Josh Naylor is our first autograph Our only autograph one auto a box Unless we get a bonus That's gonna be for John Cleveland. This is for you 60 out of 199 Still trying to spot. I might have missed one already, but I'm trying to spot a Spot a junior Caminero base card or numbered would be nice But at least a base card just I can put into my brain What his stance looks like so I know there was a Manuel Margo that'll go to EA and the Rays Oh, there is a core underneath it believe it or not You can still work on your core even with a beer belly over it. That's just excess Still a core underneath there got to work on that. It's a Blue Jays team card We got a Joe Jacques for the Red Sox to 299 That's gonna go to Mark and Boston, right? Just a just a winter coat Eric. It's a winter coat Carter For EA and the Rangers Find a few of him already. We're gonna try to find some numbered cards.  There's an Andres Jimenez Kind of crazy to hear that Warriors made a bid for LeBron James at the trade deadline. I Don't know what was what was in the mix, but I mean, I think I think as soon as the Soon as they talked on the phone I think Lakers immediately said pretty much immediately said no Now all those Ellie Della cruises will be going to Tristan I'm not sure what the scratch off is. I think There's a say a Suzuki I think there's like a code that you could enter and then you could enter like what? Day or something like that.  There's Connor Joe at celebration of the kids got to be like a fun How to be like a fun inside collection set to collect set to build and complete It's Brian Della clues No relation. I think there was a point with some some of us off there might have been a relation But there's not It's Justin Steele in a different design that that must be the club the team board or something like that See the Cubs logos around there It's kind of like betting without the money. Yeah, I think you get like an exclusive card or something like that So it's not for nothing is Gunner Henderson major league material for the Orioles a little Terrorite there in that Jersey definitely game-worn. They say EA with the O's And there's an Ellie Della cruise gold foil. This is the kind of stuff we're looking for Tristan with the Reds Nice, he's pretty good. We need to continue him being good Breaker cards. I don't think anyone wants that It was Meryl Kelly the 2024 for the Diamondbacks It's a league leaders cards again. These will be part of the left-right randomized left-right center randomizers. All right, another box I don't think anyone's gonna pay for breakers card there. I'd rather have people spend money on actual Real real product with real sports stars You come visit the shop Eric I'll give you I'll sign an autograph for you. We don't Put on these old blank cards right there, but they're the size of a trading card I mean It's really kind of an it must be a slow news day for basketball because it's sort of a nothing burger, right? Warriors asked Lakers if they would trade LeBron LeBron said no his agent said no Lakers ownership said no and Yet we got a whole segment on it on NBA Countdown Jilo There's Jilo. What's going on? I texted Jilo earlier. I saw I saw your reply. Glad you're okay Even though some of your friends got caught up in it, but I'm glad they're okay, too Jilo is in Kansas City, of course Now I think everyone by now has heard about all the shooting that happened at the end of that parade so good to good to hear that at least you are okay and Pulling these autographs too early here Dave Stewart Autograph that classic 1989 design that'll be for EA and the A's Ripping a skizz a strike is this it's kind of a sport.  Anyway Yeah, I mean That's I think that's what I was hearing. I was I was like I was like a lot of those injured or kids, which is Kind of crazy Any any word on like I think they've arrested a couple people already at least Any indication on what motivation was There's a coon you junior home run challenge card cabrion haze Yeah, well Jilo is letting me know that some of his friends got caught up in sort of the Sort of the people rushing to get out of that area. All right. There's Kyle Finnegan to 2024 nationals for Michael P And there's Trey Turner Phillies. That's gonna be for Jerry in the fighting fills Yes, please Looks like we're getting a head start on some of the shipping on this sort of stuff ladies and gentlemen, so So thanks to the people who got into the early cases you might have some of this stuff being shipped out ASAP Maybe by tomorrow There's Chris Taylor for my Dodgers to 499 What do you do with the vet base if you don't ship them they get donated? Usually give them to to the neighborhood kids that come into the shop a lot of times we load them up into a Into these little small 500 count boxes and we'll sell them and donate the money to charity We could call them donation box or charity boxes or something like that. So Charlie mourn to 199 That'll go to the Braves Jonathan and then there's Evan Carter for EA and the Rangers There's Nester Cortez piece of the Jersey Going to Tristan and the Yankees Got it three people to detain. Yeah, we'll see what the motive is gave them Joe like Don't like to see stuff like that Anywhere, you know, I don't want to see that stuff anyway, but it doesn't happen Just day and age We got Delacruz. We got Jason Dominguez Let me see more parallels of these guys that would be nice No, yeah, but It's all right, just I guess I mean it could have been worse, right? I mean, I don't know I feel like there's some still some people and Critical condition out there in Kansas City, but hopefully they'll pull through all right Next box How's picker team six looking we were holding at three teams when I started this break. We're still holding at three teams someone grab some teams and We can we can jump start Get a head start on that and pretty much if we have stuff sold out by the time I Finish these breaks and maybe it'd be good to dive right into the next one That way we don't We don't waste too much time because there is a chance that we can do all of these breaks Tonight all the cases that we have on the site. Well, at least the first seven All right, we're already on five you can do six seven and eight or six and seven I think seven Break seven is down to just a handful of teams. Yeah, break seven is down to five Break eight is already down to nine and break nine is down to 15. So I Feel like we can do all of those cases tonight. We've got time for it Definitely have time for it. So the autograph usually was on that side, right? So I'm gonna start here on this side And we got a George Kirby relic For the Mariners that's gonna go to Ross and Seattle. I did not see the renderings of the new Royal Stadium The house that Bobby Whit jr. Built or is going to build I guess Doesn't look good. I Like that. I think from the bit that I read is That they're keeping the stadium like downtown, right? Which I like nice home field advantage of my trout Angels that's for Kevin Nice Kevin. I think these are pretty short printed Obviously downtown vibes from Panini, but this is the tops version of it. I dig it Lisa Ria's Did I miss some junior Kamino's or maybe he's just a little more shorter printed than some of the other guys It's Tyler O'Neill It's like I would have seen at least one by now At least the base card Is he a landscape mode guy? There's a Luis Castillo for the Seattle that's gonna be for for Ross Doesn't look unique Gila saying they're gonna rely to enter our streetcar system They should I'm all about that's the city. Can I I'm all about public transportation? Maybe Maybe there'll be more investment into it Although no that I mean they should at least build some I mean Right, it's harder hard to drag kids through a public transportation system though All right, we got Francisco Lindor going to the Mets Meryl Kelly gold and Curtis Mead for the raise rookie auto for EA and Tampa Bay What are they planning to is that even is anything even approved stadium wise? Design first get funds and an official Location later, hopefully not too much public money will go into that those guys can pay for it Coffins known for the crown vision and that's going away. Oh No more tailgating Are they trying to keep people away from the stadium? You got to have some parking It's hard to You know I have friends with kids and it's a production trying to drag them anywhere So so like you got to have kids for families You got to have some tailgating.  It's kind of hard to do that I have parking lots, but You got to do a little bit another Ellie Della cruise for Tristan and the Reds Got a Ryan Mountcastle to 2024 for EA and the O's. Ah, you guys are voting for it in April And there's a silver Mike trout. Nice And the chrome vert tops chrome baseball, which should be in this design I think it's gonna look pretty nice These are already looking pretty nice All right last box coming up. So what's the vote on yes or no or? Or are there actual numbers involved like how much public funding is gonna happen? You know trust the new owners at all. Why? What what raises your suspicions? Voting on the sales tax needed to fund it. What is the sales tax? How much of an increase? John the commingun his last 14 games is shooting 45 percent from three 58% from from the field he's averaging 23 and six a Game 23 points and six rebounds a game basically and there is Glaber day 002 out of 199 piece of his jersey going to Tristan and the Yankees Paying a three eighth cent tax now. They want to extend it to keep funding going Wow, so it's So the youth so there's already so this isn't This is in motion At Ozzie Smith 32 at 89 has a different like a vintage back to it feels like The original card except on a sturdier stock To 89 like the like the year of the card. That makes sense. You're a wizard Ozzie that goes to Matthew and The Cardinals Kyle Finnegan gold foil. I must have missed I'm trying to spot a base Junior Caminero. I might have missed one EA, but our sorting team will obviously catch those. Here's what is this? Sweet home Ronald Acuna, Jr. The commemorative stadium medallion, that's pretty cool 104 out of 299 Fewer of these in series one this year. So I think that makes them a little bit nicer For the Braves, that's gonna go to Jonathan. I'll see you all silver So we're supposed we were supposed to know these plans back September. So John shirts coming a little reckless. Oh Yeah, that is kind of weird. There are you Money is already being raised for it But plans seem unclear and there's our autograph Spencer Horowitz For the bluebirds, that's gonna be for Darren and the blue jays Another Dominguez for Tristan and his Yankees There's a Dane Myers to 2024. That's for Jeremy and the Marlins Another Dane Myers is gonna be a gold foil for you Jeremy. There's an Ellie Della Cruz Christian Walker Carter Ryan Mountcastle gold foil Jazz Chisholm for the Marlins Last little stack right here, then we'll do silver packs and we'll do some randomizers then we'll do a quick recap home run derby card a home run challenge Derby oh a trip to the derby It's kind of a cool prize. So that'll go to the Mets. That's for Michael. And that's that silver packs silver packs Well, we're not quite done yet Hector play to the whistle. We've still got silver packs Numbered card potential autographs potential in here Social media comments were votes it almost seems like a lot of people are gonna vote no on the stadium And what what happens with all the the money that's been raised by the city that three eighth cent tax All right. Good luck everybody final bit of cards here It's just an ad these cards look pretty sharp There's some gold right there And it's a Don Raffella 17 out of 50 nice It'll be for mark and the Red Sox There's Nevin Carter for the Rangers. That's for EA and that my friends is That all right. Well for those of you who didn't hit Get him next time. Thanks for getting in For those of you who did get hits or some nice rookie cards. Congrats All right, we'll do some randomizers here So so we had some of these foil cards right here. We're gonna do Left right and center for all three of these cards like I said before the base versions We'll just be evenly distributed between the the three teams on there So we'll get a little stack of something. Let's go back to random doc or All right, so new dice new lists left center and right and Then the side on top after ten six and a four ten times one Two three four five six seven eight Nine and ten in final time center cards will get those after ten So for these three want three particular ones and any ones I missed it'll go to the Phillies Rangers and Diamondbacks and the recap Autograph and relic recap. There's a nice medallion the Ozzie Smith. They kind of top-loaded just by habit, but that's the 89 So some nice-looking stuff Like the city there's that home field advantage trouts really nice. I'll snap a picture of that Some old-school guys new school guys Nice autos game use relics Postseason insert autos a lot of great stuff. Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us more in the store get after it I'm Joe. I'll see you next time for the next series one break on jazby's case breaks.com


why do you think you were not effective tonight just a couple of big mistakes and and obviously the bow guards big situation and you know big mistake to to Schwerber Aaron mentioned the fact that you obviously had battled COVID then you had the hamstring issue just did you feel like that had an effect on you the end of the season and and at all tonight at the end of the season we're all going through and wearing whatever we've had to you know overcome to get to this point you know the other teams dealing with same kind of situation so you know when it's all said and done I didn't perform the way I wanted to perform tonight. Can you describe the disappointment you're feeling not getting the job done? Sick to my stomach. Garrett were you surprised to see Aaron come get you at that point? I mean you know we need to get a ground ball double player right there and there's probably probably nobody more equipped to do that on our team than Clay or or the Ways again at that point so you know we got a win and that's red move. Hi Garrett you mentioned that everybody's sort of wearing whatever their injuries were to this point the over the last few outings you have not been as sharp as you were before that those numbers that seems to go back to the day that you tweaked the hamstring. Do you think the hamstring is responsible for what's happened? No. Okay thanks. You're fastball in particular tonight just really didn't seem to be there what was your feel for that pitch and why do you think you weren't able to execute it you wanted to? Okay the first inning I induced three weak pop-ups on it I made a bad mistake on a change up and I you know how like you put a good swing on it and Schwerger went outside of the zone I mean it's not just I mean it's just I don't know it wasn't I don't really have a reason for it I guess I don't I don't even know if that's I don't even know if that was necessarily the thing I would say that it was an issue but I mean you know I mean when it's all said and done it there wasn't there wasn't one pitch that was good enough because we didn't get it's job done. And then a lot of them were missing up you think that could have been a mechanical issue at all? I mean a lot of times you're trying to go up so we got a few expansions up there so and we ran into one scenario where Schwerger put a good swing on it.


Clrlethe ar y dyfodol yn fawr. Gwез rywbeth panai y blwyddiadau yma yn hyfforddau SC. Rhyfoddau diwrnod o'r gweinidolfon yn rhywbeth diwrnod o'i gweinidolfon. A fyddwn yng Nghymru maen nhw'n gweld ei gweithio yn oed. Felly, mae'n gweld ei chynofiant o gwerthu. Rhyfoddau diwrnod o'r gweinidolfon yn y gweinidolfon yn y gweinidolfon yw mor 10 mennydd. Ar ddi fally, mae'n ddigredu'r rhedegau y myneddol yn beth. ddaf yn ei ddweudio i bwysigio'n gwneud hynny i'r strydyddiaethau siaradau i ddechrau항 galw caen nhw i weithio eich bydd nesaf o'r maen nhw'n rhaid iawn cymdeiantol sydd i gweithio'r asteru o'r croes a chy bleidiau i'n glendwysuol i'n meddwl i'ch gwleidio'r gwahanol. Ond nid o'n gweithio'r busau phin sy'n mynd i fflaesidio'r chael mynd i'r byd, iddo i gyfgareddau'r cysyllteidol, ond rwy'n ei'n gweithio'r give i'ch gwyffredebau skilled unlucky on individual communities and businesses, there are already 14 increases to interesting rates and stability in high inflation. Even with the recent reduction in inflation, prices are still around 15 per cent higher than did at the start of last year. Inflation remains more than double the bank of enghlin's target rate. The Resolution foundation expects the current UK parliamentary term to be the worst for living standards since— aslında, i chi gymryd i gyd, tome, the Chancellor needs to recognise this and change course. Presiding Officer, our public finances have continued to face significant challenges from inflation, Brexit, the war in Ukraine, the increased costs of public sector pay and a capital budget that does not come close to what is required. Despite those challenges, I am pleased that the Auditor General last week gave the Scottish Government's accounts for 2223 an unqualified audit opinion this for the 18th year running. This year, we have prioritised public services and delivered fair pay deals for our public sector workers, but these come at a cost and we must deliver a balanced budget. Pay deals added an estimated £1.26 billion to our recurring pay costs in 2023-24 and £1.75 billion across the public sector. This was around £800 million above the amount budgeted for 2023-24. We have worked to try and mitigate the impact of Westminster austerity, but without a change in course from Westminster, I fear that we are now at the limits of what is possible to mitigate within the powers of devolution. I have today written to the Finance and Public Administration Committee to outline the measures that I have taken to ensure that those costs can be met in this financial year. These have been exceptionally difficult decisions, but they have been necessary to protect services where they are needed the most. In total, savings and funding prioritisation of £680 million have been required in year, with £284 million already being expressed in the autumn budget revision and the remaining £396 million that will be set out in the spring budget revision. Of those, £391 million are resource and £289 million capital. Those reductions have included £10.5 million from the Future Transport Fund and £30 million from the Energy Industries Capital programme that is being delivered by the Scottish Funding Council, including £46 million from the withdrawal of the Strategic Change Transformation Fund as communicated in May, £3 million from the Efficiencies and Marine Scotland, £28 million from agricultural budgets with a commitment to return this funding in future years, and we will also redeploy £6 million held in reserves by Forestryland Scotland with that funding to also be returned in future years. Further details are included in the letter to the Finance and Public Administration Committee, which was provided to Opposition business managers prior to the statement. Furthermore, as inflationary pressures continue to exacerbate the cost of living crisis and pressures for households and businesses across Scotland, I have protected overall health spending and our investment in key programmes such as the Scottish child payment and in tripling the fuel insecurity fund for this financial year. This challenge is, as a result of prolonged Westminster austerity in the future, not unique to Scotland. Last month, the Welsh Government set out that they needed to find £600 million in savings before the end of the financial year. Accounting for differences in the size of our budgets, that would be the equivalent to over £1 billion for Scotland. The devolved Administrations have worked together to call on the UK Government for additional funding and in-year budget flexibilities to support the management of the pressures that we all face. The response so far to those calls has been at best insufficient. Presiding Officer, I am developing our budget for 2024-25, guided by our three missions of equality, community and opportunity and the Beat House agreement. In doing so, I will be reflecting on the feedback from committees following the pre-budget scrutiny process. When I presented the medium-term financial strategy to Parliament in May, I laid out the scale of the challenge that we face. I showed in May that our central resource spending outlook for 2024-25 was £1 billion higher than our central funding scenario, which was based on the Scottish Fiscal Commission's forecast at that time. Our funding for capital projects is facing a real-terms cut next year. We must meet those challenges in the 2024-25 budget. The decisions that we make must be underpinned by reform to ensure that people in Scotland get value from the taxes that they pay and secure a sustainable future for our public services. The Auditor General for Scotland raised the importance last week of reforming our public services to ensure that they remain financially sustainable in the long term. We are committed to public service reform that will help to deliver ffiscally sustainable public services that improve outcomes and reduce inequalities. The powers that this Parliament needs to deliver a better budget for Scotland are still retained in Westminster. The Chancellor needs to act tomorrow to deliver for investment in public services and infrastructure, to prioritise net zero and tackling fuel insecurity, and to supporting people with the on-going cost of living crisis. I have written to him to stress the importance of those areas. From briefing to the media in recent days, it appears that this may not be the course that he follows, with suggestions that tax cuts may be prioritised over investment in public services. Bluntly, when Westminster consistently under-invest in public services, it means that we have less funding to spend on our public services in Scotland. As I have set out, those concerns are shared by other devolved Governments. The Welsh Finance Minister and I raised the need for increased funding to address that with the UK Government directly. That is especially important for infrastructure investment. However, our budget for capital investment is constrained by the UK Government's spending decisions, with funding projected to fall in real terms by 6.7 per cent between 2023-24 and 20-27-28, and potentially more given sustained inflation. That, of course, limits our ability to deliver projects at the required pace. I have called on the Chancellor to rectify that. There must be new money and not funding that we have already allocated to other commitments. That happened with the UK Government's recent announcement in response to our request for additional funding to support flood recovery, which was disingenuous to say the least. A key part of that is ensuring that there is the necessary investment in the infrastructure that we need to meet our net zero targets and realise the opportunities for jobs and the economy. That should include confirming a decision on the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, where we have pressed the UK Government repeatedly on that and where we need to see action. I am providing an appropriate market mechanism for hydropower. The lack of action from the UK Government is preventing Scotland from fully realising its potential. It is also unacceptable in a country as energy rich as Scotland that around 830,000 households, 33 per cent of all households, are in fuel poverty. Although the energy price cap has dropped, many consumers are still paying significantly more than they were two years ago. With Gillian Martin, I have called for a social tariff for priority consumers, as well as reinstating the £400 energy bill support scheme. The UK Government must also take longer-term action to reform the electricity market so that everyone benefits from the net zero transition. We can all see the pain that the cost of living crisis is causing. We are using our social security powers to deliver a system built on dignity, fairness and respect. This year, we are investing £5.3 billion in the Scottish Government's benefits and payments that will reach around 1.2 million people, including our unique Scottish child payment. However, the majority of social security spend in Scotland remains reserved to the UK Government. I have called on the chancellor to increase working age benefits by inflation to ensure that they retain their real-terms value for struggling families across the UK. I also urge him to go further and legislate for an essential guarantee that would provide those who need it most, with the most basic of necessities and benefit of 8.8 million families. That would provide dignity and security for people who are reliant on universal credit. I have again called on the UK Government to remove the heinous rape clause, the two-child cap and the benefit cap, which disproportionately affect women and children. I have been frank with members about the challenges that we face and the difficult decisions that we have had to take to balance our budget and make best use of public money. We are doing all that we can within the limited powers that we have, but we need the UK Government to step up and use its powers for the benefit of Scotland. The priority for any fiscal headroom should be investment in public services. Tomorrow, the chancellor has the opportunity to make a real difference for people across Scotland, and I urge him to take it. The cabinet secretary will now take questions on the issues raised in her statement. I intend to allow up to 20 minutes, after which we will need to move on to the next item of business. I invite members who wish to ask a question who have not already done so, to press the request-and-speak buttons. I was going to begin by complimenting the cabinet secretary who I thought was very gracious at the finance committee this morning when she acknowledged that through the fiscal framework discussions, relationships between the Scottish Government and the UK Government had been very convivial, and that is a good sign. However, this statement completely undermines that, because it is a category of negativity that is blaming the Scottish Government for everything that has gone wrong in the Scottish Government. The cabinet secretary was right when she said in her letter to the chancellor that businesses in Scotland have faced serious challenges in recent years. Why, in last year's budget, the Scottish Government refused to pass on the same rates relief that its counterparts in England and Wales received, something that was called for by virtually the entire business community in order to stimulate economic growth and protect their competitiveness. Secondly, she cites tourism and hospitality as facing particular challenges, but does she accept that one of the biggest challenges that they are facing is entirely one of the Scottish Government's own making when it comes to the unworkable policy on short-term lets? When she talks about public services, will she finally acknowledge that one of the biggest difficulties that they face is the result of the crippling SNP cuts to local government funding over a sustained period of time? I described the discussions that I had with the chief secretary of the treasury, John Glenn, as a bit of an oasis in a desert, just to be precise. The desert being the rest of the UK Government in terms of the difficult relationship that we have in making ourselves heard and getting them to take on board the needs of Scotland's public services. The negativity—I am sorry, but there is a lot to be negative about. Choices that are going to face us are going to be largely set by the choices of the UK Government tomorrow. What I said in my statement was that they should prioritise public services. Liz Smith, in her final remark, talked about local government funding and seemed to therefore agree with me that the chancellor should therefore prioritise public service funding. I hope that she will stand with me if the chancellor does not do that tomorrow and prioritises tax cuts for the better off over public sector funding, so that she will be equally criticising him for that choice. In terms of business support, we have, of course, agreed and supported for many years the number one ask of business, and that is to freeze the poundage. We will, of course, come to our conclusions about business support as we take forward the budget discussions over the next few weeks. Daniel Johnson I thank for advance sight of the statement. After 16 years of Conservative government, we have had 16 years of short-term thinking, poor transparency and poor sustainability, and it is little wonder, therefore, that the letter that the DFM wrote was such. But is the Scottish Government not making many of the same mistakes? On transparency, she rightly asked about how the mooted fiscal changes will be paid for, but how will the council tax freeze be paid for, or will local authorities be asked to fit the bill? On long-term planning, the Fiscal Commission is clear that there is a £2 billion whole, but where is the plan to address that? On growth, there are cuts being made to infrastructure, such as ports and motorways, so that it is not undermining the growth and the growth in incomes that we need to gain extra money through the fiscal framework that is so badly needed. As I set out in my statement, the same challenges that the Scottish Government is facing are exactly the same challenges that are being faced by the Welsh Labour Government, who say exactly the same thing that the issue is the UK Government's lack of financial flexibility, the quantum delivered for public services in Scotland and Wales. There is nothing exceptional about the Scottish Government's position here. It is exactly the same as the Welsh Government and, indeed, the Northern Irish public services are facing the same problem as well. On transparency, I do not think that anyone could criticise me for not laying out the scale of the problem in the letter to the finance committee. It lays out exactly what we have had, the difficult decisions that we have had to take to balance our budget in 2023-24, and indicates the even greater challenge next year should additional resources not be coming to the Scottish Government, given the impact of inflation and all the other impacts that I laid out in my statement. In terms of the fiscal sustainability, absolutely. I will lay out in the budget the steps that we are taking. The Auditor General has challenged us to do that as well. When I set out in the MTFS the scale of the problem for next year and beyond, I was very clear that there were measures that we had to take ourselves, not least in terms of public service reform. Let us not be about the bush here. The Chancellor tomorrow could solve the issues that both Wales and Scotland are facing by making sure that the priority is public services funding. I would hope that the Labour Party would support us in that, and if it does not, I think that that must be for all of us. Deputy First Minister, Scotland's budget process, including scrutiny of the draft budget, is heavily constrained by a timetable, effectively imposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the imposition of one-year settlements. Given that no detail of the Chancellor's autumn statement is provided in advance, what difficulties does that present in relation to preparing Scotland's draft budget, particularly during this costal learning crisis, when it is so crucial to protect Scotland's public services and invest in infrastructure to build a fairer, more equal and prosperous Scotland? Can you give some makes a very important point that the lateness of the autumn statement is a particularly difficult plan for Scotland's 2024-25 budget this year? The budget process is complex to develop, and it is reliant on forecasts from the OBR and the Scottish Fiscal Commission to finalise the tax and social security policies alongside portfolio spending plans. We will always endeavour to produce a Scottish budget at the earliest opportunity for the Parliament, but the complexity and risks that are now embedded in developing the Scottish budget and its forecasts mean that a late UK autumn statement represents a particular challenge to this. Does the Scottish Government support an on-going freeze of fuel duty? We have set out our priorities in the letter to the Chancellor in terms of our priorities, and what the priorities I have set out today very clearly is that the resources available to the Chancellor tomorrow should go on funding public services, not on tax cuts for the better off, such as inheritance tax and support for bankers' bonuses. Those are our priorities, and it is for the Tories in here to set out theirs. Let us listen to the questions and the answers. I call John Mason to be followed by Rhoda Grant. The cabinet secretary talks about tax cuts. Does she think that if there were to be tax cuts tomorrow from Westminster that it would be the poorer that would suffer most or the richer that would suffer most? We have had no engagement from the UK Government on their plans to cut taxes, all we have seen is the briefing to the media, so we do not know where those tax cuts will land, how they will be funded, who they are targeted at. At this stage, it is very difficult to say. The track record of this Tory Government suggests that the poorest in our society are unlikely to be the ones who benefit most from any of their policies. We will set out our tax plans in the budget on 19 December. Rhoda Grant to be followed by Stuart McMillan. The Scottish Government are reading budgets to compensate for their financial mismanagement, budgets that are essential to meeting our net zero targets. It is also kicking the can down the road as to when it will repay the farmers their missing millions. What impact those budget cuts are going to have on meeting our net zero targets and when will farmers get their missing millions? I wonder whether Rhoda Grant was sitting in the Welsh Assembly, whether she would have said the same to her Welsh Labour Government colleagues who have had to announce the same type of annual spending reductions because of the very same pressures on our budgets. There is no difference here. We have set out our priorities. None of those decisions have been easy. In terms of the agriculture reductions that I set out, I said in my statement that those will be returned to the budget. We will do that in a way that aligns with the spending profile of those budgets. I am very happy to set that out. I will be meeting with NFUS tomorrow to have further discussions about that, but I would hope that Labour, instead of blaming the Scottish Government, would join with us in pointing the finger, as the Welsh Assembly colleagues have done, where it should be pointed, and that is at the UK Tory Government. Our capital and revenue budgets have been cut from the Westminster Parliament, thus affecting what can be invested. Other adverse effects, including inflation and the cost of borrowing, are there. In addition to now, RAC has added on to that list. What confirmation from the UK Government has the Scottish Government received with regards to the capital and resource budgets? Will it at least increase with inflation to try to protect the investment that the Scottish Government is attempting to do? We have had no confirmation from the UK Government that the budgets will increase in line with inflation. The funding that we have received from the UK Government has not matched the scale of the challenge that we currently face, with inflation eroding our spending power. Although we are using the levers at our disposal, that hinders our response to the current economic turmoil that we face. The cut to capital is particularly difficult, because we want to make the investments that we want to make, but with the real terms cut to capital budgets for the foreseeable future, that will have a major impact. I will set out at the Scottish Budget our infrastructure investment plan going forward, but there is no doubt that that will have a huge impact on our infrastructure here in Scotland and, in turn, our ability to grow the Scottish economy, which is helped by that infrastructure investment.


Going on everyone Sam here with late sports cards third time's a charm rip in 22 23 Peninian tea basketball hobby 4 box full case break number 8 picker team style Reopolis for names our teams Bobi with the Bucks That's see Chen with the Grizzlies Clayton T with the Clippers hero s6's JDL Warriors James P. Bulls and Suns Jeffrey H. Pacers John a thunder John H. Spurs Kenneth G with the Celtics mark s heat and Aaron a rocket or you'll see Hornets Sean M Kings and magic Thomas C with the Pelicans Wenschen s jazz UH Blazers UW Raptors Zack L Timberwolves. We also then had mr. CJ L with the Nets JDM with the Mavs Chris S with the Lakers Brian D Cavaliers Greg M nuggets and Nick's Chuck D wizards and Hawks and then Chris s with the pistons So good luck here everybody Check one more thing I get Pokemon cards in the mail. I'm gonna be upset.  Absolutely Greg. Absolutely Here we go. Let's do it. Sorry about the box. Thomas refunded on the map We're sold out of the night everybody too. So thank you all again. Sorry. Thank you. Thank you This is not going super smoothly Right RJ Barrett to 75 on the red for the next Grats on that one and Lamella ball stained glass nice one there for the printing plate for the Hornets got bones Hyland to 99 For the nukes Congrats Denba one there for the Pacers Timeless Treasures Danny Granger to 99. That's cool very in on that Very in on that for sure got Dyson Daniels to 25 I'm going to the pelicans rookie patch 275 RPA Trevor Kiehl's Kiehl's with the wheels. Oh, yeah They are true RPA for the next 19 of 99 John Morant on the jersey for the Grizzlies Somebody's walking around the zombie out there Got Dyson Daniels to 49 on the rookie jersey auto for the pelicans You can mag this one in my hand right now at a 49. That is a Anthony Edwards Edmund Chip Otto Congrats to the T wolves Let's go T wolves Stephen Jackson to 25 treasured moments for the Warriors.  Yeah, buddy and Jason Terry to 99 at Jersey auto for the Mavs. Congrats on that one at Dallas All right, here we go let's see Martaway jr. 99 for the Mavericks Congrats Dallas starting five printing plate for the Celtics Nice one there Time Lord Horford Tatum Brown and smart Jalen Brown game use Jersey to 99 for the Celtics Tyrese Halliburton to 99 Game use Jersey go and see the Kings biography materials. I Really have the gauntlet of bots top loading for me this week Dylan to Donnie to you to Bofa to Jake five days 11 of 99 Bernard King going to the Knicks I know it went to the the Celtics and went to the Celtics Greg is the Celtics starting five Got a Kenneth Lawton jr. Rookie Jersey to 99 for the Grizzlies Big man. That is a tailing Wharton Tucker for the Lakers on the auto nice one there THT This one's really cool go to Miami 24 at 25 three-color patch Jimmy Butler Nice one there congrats on that 20 of 49 Tony Parker going to the Spurs on the treasured signatures And then 40 of 49 Jaden Ivy going to the Pistons there we go Congrats Detroit rookie jumbo materials signatures Congrats on that That is a bowl bowl to 75 For the magic we're bad Antoine Jamison for the wizards printing plate from iMac it looks like Nice one there wizards got 81 of 99 RJ Barrett game use Jersey for the Knicks Because I know everything 98 of 99 Chris Middleton game use Jersey for the bucks Sniper Chris Middleton 23 of 99 RPA Kennedy Chandler true RPA going to the Grizzlies nice one there Memphis Rats on that Gris Got 42 of 99 that is a Keegan Murray rookie Jersey Nice one there for the Kings 73 of 99 Musa Diabata on the Dual RPA congrats on that Clippers got a Jaden Ivy Nice one there for the Pistons walking into walls man Ty Ty Washington rookie patch autograph emerald to five going to the Rockets Congrats Houston You can Magnus redemption as well go to the Rockets just because it's number to five and then great signatures to 49 Paul Pierce Nice one there congrats Celtics Paul Pierce on the auto Wonder around now. Yeah Like that run in the air screaming on me Cracked he's cracked that is a Franz Wagner to 99 Nice one there for the magic Got a duel of Kevin Garnett and Charles Barkley for the T Wolves and Sixers.  That'll be a random Usif Nirkic to 99 treasured Jersey for the Blazers nice one here biography materials. That's a throwback to 99 Bobby Portis God, it's like circa 2015 right here. Good Lord. Nice one there for the bowls There you go Chicago Got Glenn Rice to 25 For the Hornets to 99 Jeremy Silhahn rookie Jersey Grats on that one it spurs for the bowls Tony Coocoach 15 of 99 game gear Jersey auto game use for the bowls 51 of 99 Devin Booker game use Jersey for the Suns Nice one here for the magic to 49 Penny Hardaway Grats on that one there magic on The timeless talents auto congrats magic and then really nice one to end at 49 of 99 true RPA Jeremy Silhahn the inchworm going to the spurs congrats on that San Antonio very nice There you go spoils Get that one into a mag for it's do random really quick here again for the Barkley and Garnett So T wolves and Sixers It's gonna roll the dice whatever teams on top after four times look at the pleats one Two three and four go one of the Sixers Sixers gonna get the plate congrats Sixers Quick recap here everybody start with your jerseys got a Devin Booker Jeremy Silhahn Bobby Portis Youssef Nurkic Jaden Ivy Keegan Murray Chris Middleton a RJ Barrett Jimmy Butler Kenneth Lofton Tyrese Halliburton Jalen Brown John Morant Danny Granger Dyson Daniels Bones Highland Lamello ball starting five to the Celtics and Antoine Jamison Auto we've got Anthony Hardaway Tony Cuckooch Glenn Rice Paul Pierce Tony Parker Taylor Horton Tucker Bernard King Jason Terry and Stephen Jackson a lot of magcars in this one, too Dyson Daniels to 49 Rookie at Jersey Auto this one's fine these these two right here are gonna be fine most of the abate to 99 This one will be fine as well. Hello Steve Ty Ty Washington to five on the Emerald RPA redemption Rockets, I'd say Kennedy Chandler 299 true RPA for the Gris Trevor Keele's RPA to 75 for the Knicks Jaden Ivy to 49 Rookie Jersey Auto for the Pistons Anthony Edwards to 49 for the Timberwolves and then true RPA to 99 Jeremy Silhahn That'll do it for the break everybody Thanks again for the filth up next number nine and five


Welcome to All Hands Update, I'm Petty Officer Tony Rosa. The yellow jackets of Electronic Attack Squadron or VAQ-138 are participating in Exercise Max Thunder November 14th through 21st at Kunsan Air Base in the Republic of Korea. The purpose of Max Thunder is to enhance the combat readiness of the U.S. and Republic of Korea air forces. The joint aerial exercise provides tactical training for the U.S. and Republic of Korea military through mission planning and aerial maneuvers. VAQ-138 and their EA-18G Growler bring radar jamming capabilities to the training. Max Thunder also allows air crews and maintainers to gain training skills that only four deployed squadrons can experience. VAQ-138 is home ported at Naval Station, Whidbey Island, Washington and is currently on a routine deployment in support of 7th Fleet.


Item Number – SCP-521 Object Class – SAFE Special Containment Procedures – SCP-521 is to be stored in Secure Items Locker 15 at Site 39. The battery level of the GPS beacon attached to SCP-521 should be checked monthly, with a new module fitted as relevant. The steel plate covering the letter slot of SCP-521 is to remain in place outside of authorized testing. After activation, SCP-521 is to be retrieved from its new location and returned to storage, with a new covering plate. SCP-521-1 onwards are to be held in Archive 4 of Site 39, with digital copies made available on the Foundation Intranet. Access to these documents is not restricted, with the exception of SCP-521-27. Description – SCP-521 is a red postbox of a design commonly used in the United Kingdom by Royal Mail. Retrieved from England, test results show SCP-521 does not differ in composition from a standard postbox of the same design. SCP-521-X refers to the items received during activation of SCP-521. See below for more information. SCP-521-X are to be denoted numerically, and stored per procedures above when retrieved. One letter, letter here defined as a piece of paper contained within a suitable addressed envelope, is inserted through the letter slot of SCP-521. The anomalous effects of the object will activate. No other items inserted into SCP-521 will cause activation of the object. All letters must be addressed from one subject to another directly. Letters sent from a singular subject to a company or representative of a company do not cause SCP-521 activation or vice versa. Up to 24 hours after time of posting, regardless of stamp value used, the posted item will arrive at its destination, along with any other standard mail items. The postmark on the envelope is not that of the Royal Mail Company, but one similar to R- However, the original letter posted will not be found inside the envelope, instead replaced with an instance of SCP-521-X. SCP-521-X appear to be letters written during periods of conflict, often addressed from combatants to family members or friends. A list of historical records places the bulk of SCP-521-X items as occurring during World Wars I and II. See Addendum 521-E for examples. An exception is SCP-521-27. See Addendum 521-7 for more information. A current theory suggests the items retrieved during testing are letters originally undelivered. Foundation researchers are currently attempting to trace possible relatives of the writers to verify this hypothesis. Once a suitable letter has been posted and delivered, SCP-521 will disappear from its current position and reappear elsewhere inside an urban location within 150 km. Its current method of movement is unknown. However, any obstruction to the letter slot is removed during transit. No other parts of SCP-521 are affected during its transit. Any mail items posted between activation and delivery will be processed normally. After SCP-521 has completed a transition to another area, its effect will activate in the next suitable piece of mail. Addendum 521-E. Below are short excerpts from letters received during testing of SCP-521. Copies of the original letters are available to be viewed on the Foundation intranet. SCP-521-1 I told you in my airgraph a little bit about the journey here. Of course, I must not mention place names or any vital details. The boat trip did not seem over long in spite of the confined space and lack of anything really important to do. But for part of the trip, I acted as one of the anti-aircraft gunners, doing two four-hour turns of watch duty in every 24. One of these, of course, during the night. SCP-521-11 Dear mom, dad, you must by now be concerned. Not having had a letter from me for such a long time. Well, the news of the landings in Italy must by now be well known all over England, so I am able to tell you that about 70 lads including myself were drafted into the foresters to make them up to strength for the assault at Salerno. We only knew that it was for real when a dive bomber shot at us in the landing craft. SCP-521-31 Redaction present on original letter My dearest Pammy, thank you for your letter, giving me all the news. I can now give you a little more news from this side. We have just finished five weeks at Redaction, and are at the moment enjoying a rest by the Baltic coast, in the Redaction area. We were given the job a couple of days after the place was captured, and we stayed to burn the pestilential huts to the ground. About five weeks altogether. From 521-27 During Test SCP-521-D4, the retrieved letter was dissimilar to previous examples. Only a short fragment of text was recoverable from SCP-521-27 due to fire damage. Veronica, I send this letter as it may be my last. I am passing it on to a civilian detachment headed away from the containment zone in the hopes it reaches you safely. I can't say much, but I just want you to know that I love you so much. I'm sorry for what has happened. I couldn't tell you before all this, but it's our fault. The letter is written on the reverse of a Kellogg's Coco Pops brand cereal box. The partial expiry date present gives an estimated production date of January 21. The date of the letter's writing is currently unknown. Lesson complete. If you missed the previous orientation, go watch SCP-520, Knife Switch, right now. Or for the complete course, watch this playlist.