How can I clean up the audio on my podcast episodes for free?  Hello, I'm Neil Mossy and we're going to do that right now for free online. I'm a development producer by the way.  But today it's the podcast we're going to concentrate on because we're going to clean one up right now for free online with this amazing website called Orphonic.com. I use this service so much. I use it for all of my Great British YouTube podcasts. Once I've edited an audio episode, all I do is upload it to Orphonic and it automatically cleans it up and gives it a boost, a bit of a nice, you know, podcast oomph. Unbelievably, they provide two hours of free post-production processing every month. So let's work through an actual example, one of my podcasts right now and I'm going to take you through it from the beginning. So this is the website, Orphonic.com. All you need to do is sign up to put in the username, an email address and make up a password, hit Submit. Then we need to verify our email address and my Orphonic account is activated. So now we'll log in for real this time. This is what the dashboard looks like. It might look a bit intimidating at first. It was intimidating for me. That's why I wanted, whoa, which is kind of why I wanted to make this walkthrough because it's actually really easy. On the left-hand side, you can see how much time you have left. You're allocated two hours every month. When you upload, say, a 10 minute piece of audio, that will deduct 10 minutes from that two hours and it's reset back to the two hours every month. All we need to do is to hit this big red button here, New Production, and you have lots of options. So I'm going to walk you through how I upload my audio file to be cleaned up. So the first thing we need to do is to choose a file to upload to Orphonic. All you need to do is hit Choose File, then select your file and hit Open, and that will choose the audio file that you want to clean up. This file happens to be an M4A file. It works with MP3 files, WAVs. It even, I believe, works with putting videos up. So you can put in an MP4 video or a .mov and I think it cleans that up and just takes the audio off for you. I only work with audio files, even though they're audio files from the video file, just because it's a lot easier and quicker to upload. I could, if I wanted, add an automatic intro and outro, and I could add basic metadata and extended metadata and chapter marks. But I'm not going to do that for now. I just want to choose the output file and we have a wide variety of file types that it can output to. I'm going to choose MP3. The other thing that I like to do is to make my podcast mono. So I click the mono button over here and you have so many options, but I just need this last section here. There's a leveler. It kind of boosts all the parts that are quiet and keeps things at a podcast-y level. That's me doing a podcast-y level and you can select that here in the loudness target. You can choose different targets, but I go for the podcast one. It's the kind of loudness that you want for a podcast. There is a very technical explanation for this. All I know is that if I select podcasts, it makes the audio sound a bit podcast-y. The other crucial box to tick is right here, noise and hum reduction. Sometimes I turn it on and sometimes I turn it off. I'm going to be cleaning up some audio. Let's go for a medium strength clean up of 12 decibels. That has worked well for me. If it creates its own distortion, it's really easy to come back to this page and to reduce it a little. And when I hit start production, it asks, do you want to start the production? Because this is going to be taken off our two hours of free credits. So I'll confirm that with start production and now it uploads the file to Orphonic. I'm going to put my headphones on now so we can hear the difference between the original file and the file after it's been cleaned up by Orphonic. It keeps you informed at every step of the way, so it's processing the audio now. It doesn't take that long, only a couple of minutes, a few minutes, depending on how long your podcast audio is. And here we are with the cleaned up file. That only took about 15 seconds. The section of the audio that I want you to hear, you can choose between the outputs, which is the Orphonic cleaned up version. So if I hit play here. When I first started it for the first few years, you know, there's different ways to meet money on tech talk, and I think some people are a little bit dubious. So that's the output and you can click on input down here and hear what it sounded like originally. When I first started it for the first few years, you know, there's different ways to meet money on tech talk, and I think some people are a little bit dubious. Now it might be difficult to appreciate the difference if you're listening to this on a laptop speaker. I don't know what kind of compression YouTube is adding to this as well. So you'll have to take my word for it that the results are usually really, really great for my audio files. I'm going to show you now how you can adjust what you want to do before you download it. If you're happy with what Orphonic has done with your audio file, all you need to do is click the download button here. But if you want to tweak with it and you can tweak as many times as you like without it affecting your two hours allowance, all you need to do is to click at the bottom, edit this production, and you can change any of the settings that you set in the first place. You can change anything you want. What I'm going to do for a demonstration, I'm not sure this is going to work, but I'm going to change the noise and hum reduction to high, because sometimes that distorts. So let's see how different that sounds. So I've selected a slightly different output and I'll hit start production. And that starts the audio processing again for the same file, so you don't have to upload it again, but with that slightly different setting. It's so quick. So let's listen to this section again. This is with the slightly heavier noise reduction. Back then it was really bad because it was cheaper for guests and some creators in America got done really well on gifting. I can definitely hear a difference there, just even on my laptop speaker. It sounds a lot deader. Maybe slightly unnatural for me. For safety, I'm going to download that. So I'll hit download, and I'm going to make a note for myself that the noise reduction is at 24 dB. And it downloads as easily as that. Now I want to go back to the previous one and download that version. And I'll probably use that version. So I'll go back, change the noise reduction to medium, start production and let allphonic.com do its thing. If you're watching this from Allphonic, if you've worked for Allphonic, I cannot express to you how happy I am with your service. It is such a good website. It's cleaned up so many little bits of audio. And I really appreciate that I could just buy some credits when I need to. There we go. So let's hear this one again. It was cheaper for guests and some creators in America got done really well on gifting. But now TikTok are putting measures to keep it safe so kids can't send gifts on the app.  I'm going to download that one and I'll call that noise reduction 12 dB. Save. So now I have two completely different processed versions and I can just listen to them at my heart's contents and choose the right one. That's how easy it is to use allphonic.com. Is this helping? If you have reached this point in the video, please hit a thumbs up. If you have any better places, please leave a comment down below. I'd love to know how you get to clean up the audio on your podcast episodes or make them sound a bit more podcasty. And I'm going to make lots more of these. So please hit the subscribe button if this is the kind of stuff that you're into. Here's a video right here about how I use Zoom to make video podcasts. And here is what YouTube thinks you should be watching next.


We just finished singing. I have a statement to make here. This country has been held captive by the threat of ever-increasing deficits, and it became apparent several weeks ago when our nation was stunned as the stock market took a dramatic dive. There were many reasons given for the drop, but few wanted to take responsibility. It became clear, though, on that day that it was time for action, and immediately we took the necessary steps to deal with our federal budget problems. For the past 20 days, my representatives have been meeting with negotiators from the Congress, hammering out a credible and reliable deficit reduction plan, a plan that's both fair and responsible, a plan that meets our short-term concerns while laying the foundation for long-term solutions. And today I'm pleased to announce that a bipartisan agreement has been reached on the budget, not just for one year, but for two, a blueprint that sends a strong signal both at home and abroad that, together, we can and will get our deficit under control and keep it that way. This agreement is probably not the best deal that could be made, but it is a good, solid beginning. It provides the necessary services for our people, maintains our national security, and does so at a level that does not overburden the average American taxpayer. In a word, fairness. And while there will be other reports to reduce the deficit, today we're sending the right message at the right time. So let me extend my personal thanks to the congressional leadership and to the budget negotiators for the spirit of cooperation they have shown. All of us, Republican and Democrat, Senator and Congressman, must roll up our sleeves and go to work so that we can complete this important job. And the challenge before us is to make our case to the American people and to urge them to join with us in reaching our goal, a sound and enforceable budget. Our commitment is to continue on a path of growth and opportunity, and we have today committed ourselves to a fiscal path that will lead to continued economic growth and opportunity and provide a solid base for economic stability in the future. I know first, I think, maybe, Jim, would you like to... Thank you, Mr. President. This is truly a bipartisan agreement. It is a balanced package. Nobody gives some. Nobody gets everything he wants, not the president, not the Congress, not Democrats nor Republicans. It is a real set of deficit reductions. It isn't painless for the very reason that it is real and not cosmetic. I believe it is a demonstration that in time of stress, the administrative and executive, as well as the legislative branches of government, can work together, even when they're in the hands of different political parties. And so we anticipate its adoption in the House and in the Senate. I understand that it has the support of all the leadership, Democrat and Republican, in the House and Senate. Do you think you can make it stick? I have a few words here. This is a demonstration that the executive branch and the legislative branch can work together, that they have demonstrated the discipline and the will and the determination to reach an agreement that is a positive one, that is a substantive one. We think that this is a good message to send to the markets and to the people. And we are pledged to give our support to it and the full implementation of it. And I want to personally thank the president and his representatives and Tom Foley and the members on both sides of the aisle and both houses who have worked so long in preparing this package, which I think is a very good birthday present for me. And this is my 31st anniversary of my third and ninth birthday. Thank you. Well, there's a gentleman here first that should be heard from, and we're all indebted to him, and that was the chairman of the negotiations to Tom Foley. Thank you, Mr. President. I think we see this agreement as a milestone in our efforts to bring about a reduction of the deficit. It represents a consensus between both parties, the Congress and the president. And this is a good, solid plan. It does not have budgetary gimmicks or smoke and mirrors, as sometimes the words are used. It is an achievable reduction to the targets of Grand Muddman this year and substantially more next year. Andrea, did you have a question? Yes. How are we going to make this stick? How are we going to sell it to the Republicans who don't like it? And what do you say to those who say it isn't enough? Well, I think we've indicated up here that this is something that must be ongoing, but that it is a good beginning, and as to selling it to all of us that you see up here are going to go to work on that right now. Well, let's wait and see what they say when it comes around to after we've had a chance to visit. Well, Mr. President, many on Wall Street have already discounted this because of the relative small numbers, about 30 and 45 billion in the two years, and because it presumably doesn't contain any COLA reductions. So the street seems to think it's not going to be enough or make any difference. I have an answer to the street about that. Should I give it? Well, it isn't original with me. I wouldn't plagiarize, but a man sent me a letter the other day, and he just pointed out that with Wall Street looking for so many outside areas as being responsible for the volatility of the marketplace, he said even a farmhand cleaning out the stalls in a barn knows that what he's cleaning out didn't come from outside, it was produced in the barn. President? Are you attacking Wall Street? No, I'm just saying that they've got some things to straighten out themselves also. Mr. President, sir, what is your reaction to the Iran-Contra report, which charges that there was a disdain for the law in this White House and says you were responsible for this atmosphere? Sam, this day is given over to budget deficit. I'm not going to take any questions from you. How do you plan to go out and vigorously sell $9 billion in new taxes when you just the other day at the Chamber of Commerce said taxes were not the way to go on? I would like to remind you that in the budget last January that I sent up to the Congress, I had proposals in there for $9 billion in revenues, and this has been part of our proposal all the way, but they are not taxes dealing with the changes in the income tax or taxes that we think would be deleterious to the economy. But these sources of revenue, they've been there laying on the shelf since January. Mr. President, people on Wall Street wonder why this deal was put together many days ago, the basic numbers were in place many days ago, and they're saying why has it taken so long to produce so little? Because I think when you get dealing here in government with two branches of government and two parties involved in all, there are people who have their own ideas and who like to make suggestions and some are accepted and some are denied, and we finally come to an agreement. I'm holding it up, Mr. President. I mean, the numbers were set several days ago. Well, finally we came to an agreement. Have you signed the automatic transfer? Have you signed it? We better write this up. We'll follow up. Mr. President, how do you have to go here? Mr. President, are we going to announce this in our lives? Did you want to take a question? Mr. Speaker, have you identified for the President all of the areas where the taxes will come from? Or is that still up in the air? Well, I don't think it's up in the air, exactly. Have you identified the exact list of where these taxes will come from? No, and he didn't ask for one. We have a bill that we passed in the House. The Senate has a bill which has been reported from committee. The President and members of the Senate may have suggestions to make with respect to additional changes, modifications, amendments, whatever emerges from the Senate. I presume we'd go to conference with what has passed in the House. I don't think it will not be rate increases in any sense. I don't think it is achievable in this climate to have rate increases, and I think it will be unrealistic for me to expect to pass any rate increases. I, as you know, I said early on this year that my personal preference might be to extend the rate as it is, not have rate reductions for those at the top of the economic spectrum. That isn't going to happen this year. It isn't in the House bill. It isn't in the Senate bill. You are giving that pledge, sir. I don't have to give the pledge. The President has already indicated he'd veto a bill that handed in there. Mr. President, are you satisfied that they've been specific enough about the taxes and that you're not going to... Yes, and what the Speaker says is correct, but also in addition, maybe he was going to get to this, there has been an agreement on the kind of taxes it wouldn't be. What are that? Let's take a 10-minute filing break and then we'll come back to the other room. Do you know a thing? My boss is kicking us out of here. Do you now agree, sir, that there won't be a joint session with Mr. Gorbachev? That Mr. Gorbachev will not appear before a joint session of Congress? Well, they have never formally asked for one. But would you have liked one if the Republicans had not rebelled against it? No, and this never originated with us at all. There was talk of it. The Speaker right announced it, sir. But there was talk of it, yes. But no request, and he didn't... Is it going to be a summer? Did you sign the sequester order? Did you sign the sequester order? Was the sequester order? Okay, you want to take a 10-minute filing? Let's go on. All right, we'll be ending our paperwork.


Hi everyone, Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com here doing 2021 Panini Origins football four box break Number three where every spot gets you two random teams So 16 spots total everyone's two random teams in NFL and then some teams may have limited hits This is the third four box break from a case that we started obviously with the random team number one and number two So thanks to everybody for getting in here is our list of customers from Travis Hildebrand down to Ben Hoda with last spot mojo since every spot gets you two teams We need to double up this list So there you go. You can see Ben with last spot mojo once and Twice and then back up to Travis with first spot purchase And here's our list of teams from the Washington football team back up to Arizona Cardinals Dice world randomized both lists and pair them up four or two six times. Good luck guys six and final time Ben Hoda Down to Eric Jack and six times on the teams Six and final time from the Buccaneers down to the Raiders so six times on the teams six times on the names and six times on the dice and there you go Ben Hoda with the Buccaneers Joe Locust Dolphins Chargers Chiefs James Connell Giants Pasquale Pascarella 49ers Joe Locust Broncos Matt Buckler Cardinals Gale Ablo Eagles Steve Wright Saints Mark Rao Packers Cowboys Steve Wright Falcons James Connell Panthers Ben Hoda bears Kyle Littorno with the Jets Travis Hildebrand Rams Joe Locust Steelers Gale Ablo Texans Pasquale Pascarella Bangles Joe Locust Seahawks Kyle Littorno with the Ravens Eric Jock Patriots Joe Locust Jaguars Brian Frank Browns Ben Hoda bills Brian Frank Vikings Joe Locust Washington Ben Hoda lions Matt Buckler Titans Travis Hildebrand Colts Eric Jock Raiders Trade window is open Steve has Saints and Falcons up for trade So Saints and Falcons are on the trade block I'm gonna put this all up on the screen for you guys You can see what teams you have and what teams other people have potentially for trade value There you go While you guys are doing that. I'm also gonna figure out which boxes we're gonna do so you can see that these are both random team on there, right? So we're gonna pop these open Or not pop these up and we're gonna roll dice to figure out which four boxes We're gonna do one two three for the box on the left four five six of the boxes on the right It's a one so it's gonna be boxes on the left these here will be for Random team number four which I will load into the store after this I'm also gonna turn on the knit cam so that you guys can see The boxes are there. I'm gonna pop these open and just take the packs out of them Bills and lions are up for trade Joe's asking if you want to trade the bears Ten says probably not Mark is offering packers for the Falcons For you Joe or not Joe Steve Steve says no, thanks on Packers mark. I've got the packs already ready right there I mean, I'm in no rush if you guys see any potential chance for trades. I do know Steve is a bear span I do know that so if you guys think there's any chance that you guys can make any deals Let me know I'll even pause the video So that when people go to watch this video, they don't have to sit through the long negotiations periods Ben says he'll stick Steve mark you guys have any potential trades between you two or Joe you three Steve mark and Joe remember Ben does have other teams up for trade bills and lions as well anybody think we think What's his name? Chucky John Gruden anybody think he's gonna get fired packs for Broncos Joe is in the chat Joe Do you have the Broncos up for trade possibly Oliver says no?  I don't think like what he did I don't think specifically what he did would get him fired honestly. I'll say Joe says no on the Broncos Okay, so Joe's out on trades Any deals between mark and Steve then I don't think like I don't think what he said is gonna specifically get him fired, but I did point out that remember The Raiders have a ten-year hundred million dollar contract with him, which I think he's four years into or five years into right but Once if they if this is a way for them to get out of that contract without paying him any additional money that they're owed All right, Mark says rip it. Okay, so trade window closed if this is there If this is their avenue to get out of this by firing him and not paying him a single dollar more than what what they've already paid him Guess what? I think it happens That's just my opinion Because he's either four years into his contract or five years into his contract He's got another additional five years and fifty million dollars, too. I don't see how they don't look at that as like a hey Let's just cut our ties right now. We can fire him for cause Good luck guys Exactly, that's what I'm saying. I mean just use it as an opportunity to start fresh Terry McClure into 299 for Washington and Joe Locas and Daniel Jones to 79 That is eight out of 79 Jersey number for the Giants and James Connell Derek Henry and Chris Evans. That's the thing Oliver. It wasn't even leaked apparently it was part of the investigation that the NFL is doing on On on the the front office in Washington the Washington football team and in back in 2011 when he was a part of ESPN, he was emailing back with the GM of the of the the Washington football team at the time Cadarius Tony relic 75 out of 199 for the Giants that is James Connell and first auto out is Simi Fajoco eight out of 25 for the Cowboys and Mark Rao Like trust me. It seems way too convenient for it to not have been leaked, but at the same point apparently family they have Rationals far as where the information came and why it was put out there. It's very weird You got Javante Williams For the Denver Broncos Jersey and Otto Denver Broncos Joe Locas.  So that's what the investigation was But in the in the process of doing that they obviously discovered all this other stuff too, so Jarvis Landon at 299 for the Browns and Brian Frank and Aaron Jones to 25 for the Packers Mark Rao Will Fuller and Miles Garrett Apparently they went they said they went through like 6,500 or 65,000 emails Travis Kelsey 83 out of 99 just couple off the Jersey number there for the Chiefs That is Joe Locas He's pretty good And our first Otto is Chaterious 2-2 at well 19 out of 25 for the Rams and Travis Hildebrand. That is true. It's a good point Oliver They do not like his brother, so obviously by that relation. They also don't like him We've got a redemption. Let's take a look rookie jumbo patch autographs of blue Not sure what that's numbered out of but blue autograph card 35 R H a m o n d r Ramondres Stevenson Which is the New England Patriots, which is Eric Chuck? I don't I mean do I think that the Raiders would fire him? Unless they were forced to know But do I think that the Raiders might look at this as an opportunity to not have to pay him $50 million? Uh-huh 100% You got Derek Carr speaking to the Raiders 190 out of 299 For the Raiders and Eric Jock and Tredavious white 18 out of 79 for the Bills Ben Hoda You got Cooper Cup and Zach Wilson the one and only Jets Kyle Latterno There you go Kyle. Nice Zach Wilson Great looking base pairs We got a relic of Trey sermon 196 out of 199 two-color patch For the 49ers and Pasquale, Pasquarella, and I got a good name here Jamar Chates Very nice rookie out of 29 out of 199 for the Bengals Pasquale, Pasquarella again D'Ami Brown two-color patch auto 48 out of 49 for Washington and Joe Locas Very nice two-color patch auto D'Ami Brown And last pack last box Derek Henry 21 out of 25 one off the Jersey number there Titans Matt Buckler and Patty Mahomes 120 out of 175 for the Chiefs Joe Locas title locket for the Seahawks and Justin Herbert for the Chargers Joe Locas as well I really don't believe how good Joe Justin Herbert is as much as I'm a Chargers fan through and through Still haven't still haven't bought into it all the way We've got Joe Namath 9 out of 10 little single color rise to the hall Relic Nice one for the Jets. That is Kyle Laterno 9 out of 10 and back-to-back for the Jets It's Elijah Moore silver ink 32 out of 49 New York Jets Kyle Laterno and last but not least Jersey and auto Cornell Powell for the Chiefs and Joe Locas to finish it off and there you go guys. That's the break another nice four boxes in there Last four boxes from that case Are gonna go in the store in random team number four that was 2021 Panini Origins football four box break number three two random teams each from jaspy's case breaks calm I'm Sean jaspy's case breaks calm. Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you next time


So, ladies and gentlemen, module 177, here we are going to look at the various entrepreneurs. How many types of entrepreneurs could be? Could be creative entrepreneurs, could be fashion entrepreneurs, could be female entrepreneurs, could be many other types of entrepreneurs, could be the directional entrepreneurs, could be undirectional entrepreneurs. Kupabji was also made by someone. And then there were positive effects, but the societal bad impacts were different. Who are creative entrepreneurs? Let's discuss the case in the UK based online, they even played from providing a resource for the people's start-up and growing creative business. So, what does the company do? They give different ideas, they make those ideas. In the same way, there was a company in Pakistan, it was not named in the first place, but now it has been flopped. There have been a lot of flopping in the Ministry of Industries, but in the first place, they were very successful. But if you look at it, they used to make the entire industry of manufacturing, or construction, or construction, or construction, or construction, they used to make the entire industry, they used to operate, return on investment, they sold the industry first, and they handed over to the private business owners. Could this idea not be in Pakistan again? It should be. Then there is fashion entrepreneurs, they are working on different ways, design of clothes, design of things, interior design, they have a lot of ideas. Female entrepreneurs, why do we segment this? What is male-female entrepreneurship? Also known as a women entrepreneur, income passes approximately one over three of all entrepreneurs worldwide. Why we are focusing, why we are segmenting? Human is human by male or female. So, women entrepreneurs had a new idea, which was retreated. It is under the basis of the IR relationship, because of some special powers, it was segmented. The wireless is wrong, where women are put in cars, and on those cars, where there is a requirement for women's fingers, where only children and women can work. Similarly, in the process of making football, women and children can work. But to improve it, to improvise that this labor is wrong, child labor is wrong, women's work is wrong, but women's idea is different. You separate the child labor of children. Now, to separate entrepreneurs and women entrepreneurs, to break it, that must not be that way. You should not make a sympathetic idea. You should develop them with equal rights. You should definitely get them out of those post-mortem areas. But normally, this idea is used in a sympathetic way, which is quite very wrong. But in this entrepreneurial idea, where women are not allowed to work, it is good for the environment. But labeling the entrepreneur with any male-female or gender-specific, that's not the right direction. Many times, you have to see criticism. However, entrepreneurship or the women entrepreneurship is must. And they should come in different relevant areas, in every area. In fact, women can be engineers, soldiers, women, take the example of China. They can be from labor and hard work, we cannot make them sympathetic. So don't call it female entrepreneurship. They are also an entrepreneur. So we are now clear with the idea of entrepreneurship. Thank you very much.