Okay, hello and welcome. Good afternoon. It is Wednesday, 23rd of December, and we've got the third and final installment of our Outlook for 2021, and I'm joined by our managing director and co-founder, William DeLucy, and also one of our senior traders and who rentals our elite program, Tim Dove. So these two guys definitely trade an invested interest in a variety of different commodity products. So they're the best two people within the team to speak on this subject. As per usual, I think to kick off the conversation, I think appropriate to maybe have a bit of a recap on what's been a pretty incredible year for going to kick off with the oil market. And I know you've got a great annotated chart, Tim, of talking about the kind of ebb and flow of the actual year as a whole. But we were just discussing before we came on air, do you remember back on the third of January, when the Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander Soleimani was assassinated by an ordered Trump drone strike in the area? And then that was met with a corresponding response from Iran, and they attacked US Iraqi based Air Force bases at the time. And oil was moving quite aggressively higher. And Tim, this was a map I know that you'd like to talk about with some of the traders in terms of the sensitivity geographically of this area. So maybe a quick word on that, and then a look at your annotated kind of chart and the story of 2020. Sure, yeah. I mean, I actually used to have a printout, very similar to this. I actually had about three maps right beside my desk. And it would have, you know, you have the squawk, shout out a name of some completely obscure area in Saudi Arabia or Iraq or Iran, and you kind of like, you'd have to consult the map and kind of figure in, is this an important impactful area or not to supply and demand.  And that was actually kind of in sort of from point, just in what it was basically one of these meaningful areas you can see in the Saudi Arabian region. Yeah, just just there. There was an attack there in September. We had a record 15% gap on the open on oil on that. Obviously, you've got the choke point of the straits of her moves, which, you know, I mean, to an oil trader rockets fired in the straits of her moves. That's an absolute dream in terms of price getting on the bed. I think we saw a bit of that a bit of instability in that last year, and leading up to really what was the Soleimani murder and these following air attacks. But yeah, you know, this is just such a key area for oil traders to monitor. More so, any of the facilities that are producing oil around around, well, that feed in through that straits of her moves choke points. And so Iraq is pretty well sandwiched in there between Saudi and Iran. So, you know, that they're feeling pressure. It is a proxy jump point for US military maneuvers in that area. So it is prone to tax attacks from Iran. And really, you know, that this is kind of also why Syria is a bit of a battleground and why the US and Russia basically for the last six years have been vying for control of that Syrian region. So just on this on this point, Biden is obviously coming in. And Biden has a very different stance on Iran, perhaps a return to the nuclear agreement accord, which means a relaxation potentially of Iranian sanctions, which might lead to Iran, who is the third largest producer within OPEC to be able to pump the levels they just haven't been able to pump at. The stats I've seen is that that could allow Iran to increase production by circa one and a half to two million. Now, is that just insignificant because we're just so much more dominated by the demand recovery story. And so the Biden-Iran nuclear thing layered in with the fact that is Iran really that hardly agenda for Biden politically? He's obviously got to deal with the virus and things of that nature is much more important both medically and the economy. So does that come into this equation at all with Biden or not really? I think, yeah, the concerns and your rhetoric there is completely valid, but I don't think that Biden really has this top of his list. I think he's quite happy with with where things are with the Chinese negotiations. I don't think he wants to come in and rock the boat usually there. Yeah, I'm just trying to cast my mind back to that first week of January. I thought there was a growing attention of which I think, you know, this is a great thing to understand about markets. And you guys will know this is that markets are quite channeled actually in their macro kind of hierarchy of what's the subject that's dominating investor center at that point in time. A epidemic then happening literally week or two after this World War three raking out, which then created then the pandemic just absolutely took the Iranian issue or tensions in the Middle East. And we know that, you know, tensions between say Saudi and Iran at the core is never going to go away. But that gets compartmentalized if you like, because there's a bigger narrative in town. And that's what we focus on. So for me, it was more like they, this could have developed I felt at the beginning of the year. But it's just a bigger theme, just put it onto the side. And that's where it stayed. And I think that's where it will stay for the time being 14th of November 2016. This is when Donnie took office with Melania. And we were trading back adjusted, of course, 58 56, you can see the almighty bid that really we did take above there. And then coming into this, basically, we've got this huge compression now on oil.  I think this is going to be where we're going to sit largely for quite some time in 2021. And yeah, we'll have some volatility coming up the top here, you know, kind of 66 is or their best. But then I think we're just going to put in a whole lot of trade here. You know, coming back to generally the core theme for me on oil, the one thing I did want to express in this call about oil is the demand is still there. But the recovery in terms of production level, production recovery is really in a sore place. And there are less and less companies available to produce oil at the required demand needs going into all the way through to 2025 now. So I think it's going to be largely a sustained steady upside on oil for some time. So just while that's getting set up, just to recap, if you didn't see the first kind of episode in this outlook series, which was peers gave a really good macro outlook of which covered a lot of these points that will be relevant for gold, which I know will can add an incredible amount of value on the behavioral side of this as well. But the general theme then to set the scene with gold was that rising inflation expectations, lower real yields, weaker dollar, and a re pick up in physical demand, particularly in some of the emerging markets as we go through this recovery globally, vaccine post COVID has generally got the street still fairly bullish in terms of goals, and hence some of the recovery we've seen off the loads, but put that out there to as a starting point. And then I know, Will, you've got some good insights you want to share. Yeah, you know, it's interesting from from the behavioral point of view, and Tim's chart annotations there. I mean, from the macro point of view, I'm certainly with peers as you know, I've been for a while, I do think the move lower since November is justified, given Biden, given the vaccine, for example, but it's interesting to me that given Biden and the vaccine news that that actually it seems still seems pretty strong. I mean, the way I tend to trade or invest is let the market try and tell me what it wants to do. And I think gold had plenty of reason to sell off in the short term below 1700 vaccine and Biden, right, really good. And I understand the longer term inflation play for sure, but that's not going to come through until what, next year, end of next year, right, I understand the other macro themes that Pierce was saying, but again, that's not not now that that's there in the background, there's as inflation always is, to be honest. So the fact that there wasn't a bigger negative reaction, and it feels to me, if you look at Tim, so Tim, is this a daily candle you're looking at here? Or is it actually weekly candles? Yeah, I mean, if you just have a look at the last actually go to daily there for me then, Tim. Yeah, sure. Let's see how it's looking today, but it just feels to me that it's a little bit more buoyant. I mean, there's quite a nice, if you look from the low that was hit there at 1767, which was at the start of December. So really, from the start of December, had quite a nice wave pattern higher, right? You can see that it just feels quite nicely supported to me gold. So you've got the train channel that Tim's got there, but you've also got that horizontal line at 1960, which now, you know, took a lot of effort to get above actually, you know, how gold moves takes a lot of time. So yeah, certainly in the nearer term, feels buoyant, feels good. I think I agree with the fundamentals in the longer term. You know, gold is quite a strange one, though. You saw on Monday with the new strain of the virus, right? And actually gold took a big push lower. Yeah. Do you remember that on the short term? And went lower as soon as we got that new virus strain. So I think it's a difficult one to play on the sort of short and medium term. I really do. But yeah, gold seems impressive. It seems there's certainly plenty more reasons to have it than not. I do think predicting inflation is a really difficult thing to do, because one of the reasons why gold moved as it did from 2009 to 2011. Do you remember, we went from $600 to $2,000 was really on the expectation of loose monetary policy creating inflation. We've now got that loose, looseness in spades. But no, no, I mean, talk to me and see what are their signs of any inflationary pressures yet? Are they starting to sneak through? Or is it more or less likely we should do a vote? End of 2021, will inflation be above or below 2%? What do you reckon? In the US, United States inflation? I think it'll still be probably below. Yeah, I think. And the other thing as well is that the Fed obviously introduced that new average inflation targeting as a new policy directive of now they know that. So the problem you have if you're the Federal Reserve is the difference between now and the financial crisis is that let's say the vaccine is the panacea to the virus problems, it fixes everything. The economy should go like this. And that's massively problematic from a central bank's point of view, because then you could get this like literally rampant inflation, technically speaking. So what have they done? Well, they've already adopted AIT, which is basically saying, well, look, before we all know having been in the market for a while, we don't need to get to 2% for people to start getting a bit edgy about higher rates. We start just coming off the floor and heading in a direction which looks like future inflation or the indicative of hitting it, the market already starts to panic. But the Fed have kind of nipped that in the bud by moving to a system whereby we'll let it run hot. We know it's going to run hot because if the vaccine works, the economy is going to fire up pretty significantly quickly. So that doesn't necessarily mean that that's going to necessity or necessarily result in action from the Fed. And I think a lot of that is underpin why equities remain and where they are. And you're right. I think inflation is a story for a bit later. But we did have a spook what seven, eight weeks ago, the market had a little bit of a move, the 10 year moved a bit, and it was a bit like, people started mentioning the five year break evens and the FT every day. So we have had it's on people's radar, which is enough for the first step for people to be thinking, I think about inflation is actually inflation. The indicators pointing to that materializing anytime soon will probably not. So I'm going to bring us back to commodities. And one of the things I want to look at was not gas. So just to share a couple of concepts about not gas that are being tracked in some fundamentals. I'm just going to hit you with some graphs there. Essentially, the key instigator for this and I'm bullish not gas as are others, right? But this is the lower 48 States production of not gas at the moment. And we've really been degraded down to production levels for most of 2020, given that there are less oil pumping or drilling rigs at play. So therefore, gas is most of the time, it's actually a derivative of the process of drilling for oil.  But the point being is that the production has been so scarce that it's just really starting to pick up pace with 2019 production. And then obviously, we're above the 2018 and whatnot. However, the demand for this product is obviously still there. So we are still well below 2019's productivity levels. Let's give you a little look at the sort of North American breakdown of how that production is going in terms of North continental America. And added to this picture, we have this emerging cold weather pattern that's coming in that, you know, then that gas you'd love to love to look at the weather patterns. And it has been a pretty warm winter so far in North America. But as you can see, this is sort of the next 15 day forecast for getting essentially a cold snap all across North America. So there's a couple of different reasons that people are buying into the long scenario in that gas. A lot of people quoting $4 by the springtime. I have looked at the prices on the September contracts, September 2021. And again, we are quite cheap, I would say, in that gas. So I think we're starting to see sort of a bottoming out here on this. I've been long this thing pretty much over the last couple of days trying to work into something. I'm thinking about going to execute in the September contract. So I don't have to keep rolling futures contracts. I'm thinking about getting long call options on some gas ETFs on some gas companies. So that's really something I wanted to cover. And I'm going to post some links to some of these stories as well in the room as we finish up. But you just wanted to get that covered.  So if we start going into say industrial base metals, iron, copper, tin, these sorts of things, or either precious metals that I guess we don't typically look at. So things like palladium, platinum and so on. I mean, I've always said to people that, of course, you can trade those markets technically. They will respond much in similar ways to other products. And if you look at silver, I remember, was it six months ago? Silver was like gold on steroids when it was moving. So it was very behavioral, very technical. And anyway, the fundamentals were almost diminished because it was all moving on the similar kind of narrative at the time. So if you were ever going to look at trading, let's say a new commodity product, would you spend a period of due diligence going into, I know, obviously you feel comfortable in the NAC gas energy space.  I mean, is that how would you go about with these guys if they wanted to explore other products? Because obviously there's hundreds in commodities. Sure. Yeah. I mean, look, there's like a hundred different grades of oil you can trade as well, you know, what a lot of people don't really realize. But yeah, to be honest, you don't need to be that saturated in all of the fundamentals on these particular products. You do need to be aware that there are sort of pockets of communities around the internet that you can find on Twitter and research notes that you can find where you'll actually stumble upon a little hive of people that actually are all over a certain commodity like tin, for example. I've never traded tin, but I do know that there are places where you can find a whole load of tin traders. And there is a market there, there are pit hours for that. And once, you know, that I think to answer the question that's wrote in there with, you know, how do you specialize in a product? And, you know, knowing that there are fundamental key data events, there is seasonality to gold, for example, you know, Indian wedding gold buying season September, you know, you kind of need to be aware of some of these, these timings and, you know, any relevant data on certain products. So it's kind of planned in hand with changing to specialize in any product. But actually, on that point of seasonal demand, I thought it was quite interesting is that India, for example, no one really talks about COVID in India, because we live in England, or you live in Ireland. And so what point is it of a media news agency in our world, talking about Indian COVID cases? But obviously, these types of areas, these under developed countries have been impacted greatly by COVID. And one of the things that I was reading was about India, which obviously from a physical point of view, along with China, but also India, a lot of a lot of weddings have actually been delayed, or put off, for obvious reasons, the obvious reasons being that, I mean, you can't social gather, people don't want to put people at risk.  What that does mean is that overall, I saw the World Gold Council stat that gold demand dropped 10% the year over year in the first three quarters of the year. So physical buying of gold is down 10%. Now that's the first three quarters, Q4 so far is showing some signs of recovery. That's what we've seen in other markets, like in oil, for example, kind of post vaccine Pfizer 9th, 10th of November was to trigger almost the catalyst. And we started to move up. So a couple of interesting things would be, is there an argument, as well as all the other stuff we talked about with will about gold. There's just a physical pent up demand that needs to play out as a story here in 21 potentially in the second half. Well, you know, there's a couple of things that are great about this conversation here. You mentioned India, China, but let's just look at India. So when we went negative on oil, and we stayed low on oil for like 30s, low 40s, who was buying all of that oil? Where was the oil being soaked up? It was India, and it was China. China were building storage online storage facilities as fast as they could, and then just had this queue of ships, oil tankers queuing up in the ports, waiting to load it into these facilities that are literally just being built the day before, literally. Same in India, they were just soaking up all of the cheap oil. And so again, in a commodities market, commodities are supply and demand price based. And there's nothing like cheaper prices to get people out there buying it. Essentially, you know, have a look at the video footage of it was a Black Monday and sales in the US, you know, people punching everybody to try and get that LCD TV or whatever for, you know, $200 cheaper. Essentially, there's nothing like lower prices on any commodity to attract buying. Yeah, that certainly plays out that interesting with China economic data of recent months has really been quite impressive, as much as there's a hesitancy of market participants to really buy into the quality of the data in which they receive, the net result is that, you know, if China has secured a lot of this base component that's key to manufacturing activity, essentially, then that's got to be a positive story, not only for themselves, but for the global picture, if they can perform. I guess the counter argument to this is it's all well and good if China are in a good spot from a cost perspective to operate efficiently. But what if their customers aren't ready? And the customers being Mr. USA and Mr. Europe and his friends, just reverting back then to conclude, I mean, is it a fair assessment to say then that throughout the conversations we've had over the last three days, talking parrots, talking commodities now, talking actually yesterday, core core to a lot of what we've spoken about coming to fruition is really dependent on the vaccine and the timeliness of that. And so that in itself, I think from a top level macro perspective is really where you guys need to have your mindset going further into the beginning of next year, particularly I think the first three to six months is going to be key. And I say that because COVID cases are going through a renewed acceleration phase in the places that matter for financial markets right now, which has developed world economies. And that's going to be met forcefully with government renewed lockdowns. And that is going to have economic implications. So the virus is critical more now than the vaccine, I mean, is critical more so now than ever. We are in the first steps of that. There's other companies that need to follow suit still to go through the kind of the end part of actually getting to manufacturing and distribution stage. The distribution barrier is still a hurdle to be mounted at this point. And so there are certainly risks, I think. But just again reiterating, I think we have a shared view of what kind of peers were saying on the first day, which is that the base case scenario is that the variant that we're seeing in the virus is not detrimental enough to deviate from that course of expectation that 2021, all things considered, should be bullish for stocks, should be bullish for commodities. And that's supported by the prevailing dollar weakness as well, in that sense. Absolutely. I think, yeah, to round this off, I think the greatest trades that I've enjoyed myself is the deviation from the base case. Here's the base case, the new variation, new variant of COVID is going to be contained by all of the vaccines that we have. January 10th comes out, the new variant is totally immune to the vaccines. You're going to see March, part two, March 2020, part two, I think, under that circumstance, albeit will be contained to the downside because they will be able to deploy a vaccine for that new variant a lot quicker. But you will see huge amount of volatility, you're going to see dollar back up. And essentially for me, 2021 is a dollar story, and it's a vaccine story. And they're the two key things that I'm going to be looking at to drive most, if not all of my investment trading decisions.


The Republican obsession with falsifying our nation's history continues. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. You're saying it's the GOP that has an obsession with falsifying history. Wrong, wrong, wrong. This entire story is about the dishonesty and revisionist history that's coming from the creator of the 1619 project. An effort to rewrite American history in favor of a Marxist-derived movement to destroy American capitalism and replace it with communism. You'll notice that no point during this hags ranting does she back up anything she's saying and in fact does her best to dismiss all legitimate criticisms as mean, racist, white Republicans whining. With nearly a dozen states including GOP-backed, introducing GOP-backed bills that would ban schools from teaching critical race theory. A decades-old academic concept that examines systemic racism. If the latest issue conservatives are fixated on. First of all, it's not a concept. It's an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that seeks to divide up everyone by race and align everybody against white people. Seriously, this stuff reads like a typical anti-semitic conspiracy theory except for White Star the Target. That's with Antifa or democracy. They don't seem to understand what it is. Oh, right, right. Democracy is one party rule propped up by a party-state media complex from a far-left Marxist cult that wants to replace capitalism with communism. Democracy is lashing out at people, raising completely legitimate questions about the sudden implementation of a fringe conspiracy concept. Democracy is four years of trying to undo a democratic election because you can't accept the results, but it's only legitimate if Democrats do it. Now this war against a clear-eyed factual understanding of our history which is all critical race theory is. It's a war against our press freedoms, too, of the 1619 Project, the New York Times Magazine Project that situates slavery and race at the center of this nation's history and narrative where, frankly, it has always belonged. It's a project that conservatives despise, calling it propaganda because it dares to address slavery. Well, to me, she seems like a snake oil selling huckster and you'll see why here in a few moments, but first give me just 30 seconds to tell you about this special offer for my viewers. College and product sales are spiking and for a good reason. Collagen is revered for giving skin its strength and elasticity along with its power to reduce wrinkles. If you want a more youthful appearance, you should regularly take collagen supplements, but there's a problem. This is why I love collagen. Not just regular collagen though, multi-collagen. What is multi-collagen? It's a solution for aging that America is going crazy for. Within days of trying multi-collagen, users report noticing a more youthful appearance, decreased wrinkles, thicker hair, healthier nails, and pain-free joints. I highly recommend healthwithdronetech.com. Try it out now for 51% off by going to www.healthwithdronetech.com or by visiting the links in the description or pinned comment. Because this red-hot vitriol for her and her work, Hannah Jones, was denied a tenured position at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. No, it's propaganda because it's a political revision of history using falsehoods, lack of context, and just outright lies. She's not a journalist. She's never been to journalism school. What she has done is lots of political activism with far-left propaganda publications, which as we know is all you need for journalism now, which only exists to prop up the Democratic Party's power and discredit their opponent. The 1619 project means different things to different people. For some, including myself, it's a phenomenal piece of journalism challenging us to reframe US history by centering the legacy of black Americans, starting with the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in 1619. I'm just gonna stop that right here before she goes any further because the first African slaves did not arrive in America in 1619. For one, African slavery had been going on for a long time before America was even settled in South America, for example. In 1616, Spanish colonies enslaved Africans going back to the mid to late 1500s. There was even a slave rebellion in 1526. The suggestion that African slavery started in America on 1619 is purely a way to frame it as a white project, which it clearly was not. It's absurd. Add to it that the reason she wouldn't get tenure is because some conservatives are offended about the way that she's doing journalism and history because she won't do the sing-song rose-colored glass as America's perfect in 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean through BS. I really cannot stand this harpy. Everything that comes out of her mouth is BS. I can only speak for myself, but I'm sure I'm not alone in this. I learned about all of America's dark history. In fact, I say that I and everyone else have been brow-beaten with it from the moment that we were conscious enough to take it all in. It's always taught that America's original sin is slavery without nearly as much emphasis on the fact that Americans also ended it while it was still going on around the world and in places like South America. And in fact, it's still going on to this day. Her characterization is a total strawman that lacks any substantiation. And let me just say, many credible people have come out against the 1619 project and raised questions and have criticized it, but of course they all get smacked down or ignored. In some cases, the fact-checkers did speak up and were just ignored by the publication. Only to see them quietly revise the piece six months later. Alright folks, that's all I have for this one. I do want to encourage all of you out there who are fighting CRT in your schools to keep up the good fight. As always, thanks for watching and I'll see you all tomorrow.