Today, we are once again going to be questioning whether Goodreads users have taste, and welcome back to my channel. I hope you're all good. Today, we're going to be looking at and reacting to the lowest rated books I've read according to Goodreads.  I kind of agree with the majority of what was highest rated or at the very least I could see why it was so highly rated. I think I gave them all four or five stars. I feel like this is gonna be more controversial. Because I quite often love weird books that other people find a bit strange and don't really love, so I feel like we're gonna have a few of them where it's a strange book. Everyone else hasn't really vied with it, but I have because I love the weirdness.  I've covered the screen. I've shut my eyes mostly, and I've counted down 10 books. So we're gonna go from 10th lowest rated to the lowest rated book I've read according to Goodreads. Leave any predictions you have down below for what books are gonna be on here before we actually look. I really don't know what's gonna be on here. I have like no predictions. I hope we're gonna have some like ones that I actually dislike. Like I hope I'm gonna agree with some of them. But before we actually get into the video, I want to take a moment to thank the sponsor for today's video, which is Skillshare. I have loved Skillshare for so, so long. I've used it on and off probably since I was 14. It's like seven years now. Fuck, I'm old. It is an online learning community with thousands of inspiring classes for creative people. I'm sure you know what it is. But if you haven't tried it out yet, why not? Why not? Why not? They have classes on illustration, video editing, photography, social media, marketing, productivity. Like every skill you can imagine, they pretty much have it. A lot of you will know that I have been starting my writing journey, kind of. So I'm just about to start Storytelling 101, Character Conflict, Context and Craft by Daniel Jose Older. This class is really supposed to break down what makes a great story, so captivating, so riveting. So I'm hoping it will be super helpful for me. It is the perfect place to just develop your creative skills and have fun with it. I really love Skillshare. So the first 1,000 of you to click the link down below will get one month free of Skillshare. Not a week, not two weeks, a month. A month free of Skillshare. So I genuinely feel like there's nothing to lose. Go give it a go.  Okay, let's see what the 10th lowest rated book I have read is. Here's Beauty by Jack Harbin. So this has an average rating of 3.44 with 861 ratings. So not a lot of ratings and not a not a great overall rating. I have to say I agree with this pretty much. I gave this to two staff. So yeah, I agree with it. I was so disappointed with this. I loved Meet Cute Club by Jack Harbin. I think that was like a four star. It's a book that really made me feel like I could enjoy romance. And then I didn't really like this. And I felt bad because I got an ER of it as well. It's a Beauty and the Beast retelling. I didn't enjoy the relationship between the Beast and Belle. This is not for me. No. It's that kind of like dark romance, I think. I just maybe don't vibe with that. I don't vibe with like, well, I can't remember to what extent it was abusive or semi abusive, the relationship. But I just don't vibe with that. I need my romance to be cute. So maybe this was never for me and it's my fault.     He's not meant to be in here. As he got in here, get out. Okay, what is number nine? Okay, the ninth, oh, this is going to be a series. Hang on. Hey! Oh, excited. Okay, okay, sorry. Ninth and lowest rated is The Sanatorium by Sarah Pierce with 3.43 average rating. I got an ARC of The Sanatorium. This is actually the first ever physical ARC I got, which is so exciting. I give this four stars. I enjoyed it. But I remember my mum hated it. She really just liked it. I think she DNF'd it. So maybe I went outlier here. So this is about this detective who goes to say at this like isolated Swiss hotel that has been converted from an old sanatorium. There's like people going missing. There's mysterious circumstances. There's deaths, yada yada. I enjoyed this. I mean, I'm a hoe. I'm a hoe. I'm a hoe for isolated, close circle, murder mystery, thriller kind of things. So it was already like geared towards me. I was already biased. But I don't know. I enjoyed it. I thought it was a fun thriller. I thought it had a really good amount of twists and turns. I will say the ending. Oh, I've got a bookmark in here. That's where you are. I had lost that bookmark. The ending was like a two star. The ending was not good. So maybe that's why it's got such a low average rating. It's also got 67,826 ratings. A lot of people have read this, but I think it is so low because the ending is bad. The ending is objectively bad because it's like super on the nose. Like the kind of villain's speech is the author obviously wanted to make a social point, but it hadn't been bled into the rest of the story and it was kind of just like the ending it was clunked on. So the ending was bad. The ending was like a two star, but I enjoyed the rest of it. I enjoyed the rest of it. So I can understand why this is low rated because of the ending, but I enjoyed it personally. And I was just freaking out because it turns out it's going to be a series. We've got the retreats coming out in April 2022, which is another isolated mystery.  I'm really excited. Anyway, what is number eight? No way. I disagree. I disagree. That is incorrect. I am really uncomfortable right now and I'm feeling like I want to get up and leave. Number eight lowest rated book that I have read with average rating of 3.42 and 1,956 ratings is You Must Not Miss by Katrina Leonard. This is wrong. This is wrong. No, no, sorry. You're all wrong. No taste. No taste. So this is wrong. I guess I should have predicted there was going to be some weird books on here that I loved most people love. This is weird as fuck, right? This is weird as fuck, but I loved it. Oh my god. What a great book. You're all wrong. Excuse me. So this is about Magpie, which first of all, I mean, I know, she's called Magpie.  And then near appears in her garden shed basically and she can go there and major trigger warning. So sexual assault in this is kind of a lot that comes up throughout the book, but I loved this. I thought it the anger, the anger, the anger, the anger in this book. Oh, so good. The way that it articulated anger from a girl after she's been through like a really shitty traumatic experience and how that anger is validated. I live for it. I am, I just love it. I love it. So you're all wrong. You're wrong. 3.42. No, I love this. I can't wait to read more Cachino Lenno. It was amazing. So you're all just very, very incorrect, very incorrect. Okay. Number seven lowest rated, the perfect nanny, or it's also called lullaby in some languages. It's gone average rating of 3.4 and 84,535 ratings. I read this before. I had my YouTube channel pretty sure. Yeah. Or had I just started my, no, I think I just started my YouTube channel. I read it for a book club that I was a member of at uni for like three months. I gave this three stars. It says on Goodreads, but I think if I was to rate this now, it would be like a two or maybe even lower. I didn't like it.  I am so random. I can't believe I just did that. This is about a nanny. Wait, what, what do you even know?  I can't remember what you know in this synopsis. I'm just going to keep my mouth shut because I can't remember what you know. I swear it opens with that. Oh, well, maybe not. And it's about a nanny working for this rich family and it's a thriller and it was just not good.  It was so boring. I was just bored shitless. I was bored shitless. Bored shitless. It's like, I can't even remember well enough to critique this. I read it like two, three years ago. No, two years ago I read it. I'm going to, but it's just not memorable and it's bland and it's boring. It's kind of like a character study of this nanny. It's not a high-paced thriller. It's very much a character focused thriller and it was just boring as fuck. So yes, I agree that this should be that lowly rated because it just, no. Okay, number six, right? What's the sixth lowest rated? Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. I'm surprised this is only six. I thought this would be the lowest rated with an average rating of 3.38 with almost 5,000 ratings is Jonas, The Beautiful Dead Book One by Eden McGuire. So here's the situation with this book. If you don't know, I reread this maybe about a year ago because this was my favorite book growing up. I had trashed taste for a while. I was very, like, I loved Twilight, you know, so I read a lot of like paranormal romance when I was a kid. Can't imagine, you know, couldn't be me now. That's all my taste now, but I loved it. I loved it. This whole series was in my library at school and I got everyone to read it. It's basically about this girl's boyfriend dies and she finds out there's this group of kids who have died recently in town. They each are kind of these beautiful dead. They're kind of like ghosts and they've got a year to figure out how they were killed to get like eternal peace essentially. My love for this is shown about my early career as a book influencer because I got everyone to read this book. It was in year seven, so we were like 11. And we all loved it. And I just wish I had never reread it because I could look back fondly on this, right? I could look back fondly on this book and this series and think, wow, what a great series that was. No, ma'am. It was bad. I will just say that I sabotage a lot of things. I gave this one star when I reread it. It's just like genuinely the worstly written book I've ever read in my life. But something about it must work because why did we all love it when we were 11?  But now it was just terribly written. It just the plot made no sense.  It was robotic. It was so bad. But I wish I had never read it. I wish I hadn't read it again because I just want to look back on it fondly. But yeah, very deserving of being one of the lowest rated. I'm getting nervous now. We're into the top five. If there's a book that I gave five stars on the top five, I'll be fuming because it doesn't deserve it. I will, I will kick something over. Honey, you've got a big storm coming. Okay, number five. Really? What? Okay, I'm kind of shocked. Number five is Meet Cute Club by Jack Harbin with an average rating of 3.3 with 2500 ratings.  What is up with that? That is a cute romance book. Why is that the fifth lowest rated? And why has it got a lower rating than his beauty? His beauty I can understand because I was like, okay, it wasn't great. But this was good. I gave it four stars. Oh my God, what? In my opinion, this is a really cute story between these two guys. It's really cute love story, them like getting to know each other and one of them works at the local bookshop. One of them runs like this cute like romance book club and it was just so cute. I don't understand why this is low rated. Maybe I don't know because I thought they're writing and this was good because that's why I was so disappointed by his beauty. I generally can't understand that. Okay, I think the problem people have with it is it's quite a short book, right? It's like not long. So you don't get a lot of depth in the relationship between them, but I feel like you did a good job with that. But maybe that's why. Maybe it's like a bit shallow for some people, but I really enjoyed it. So don't understand. So number four, with an average rating of 3.27 with almost a thousand ratings is The Baby is Mine by Oyun Can Breath Wait. Now I think I, it says I gave it three stars. I think this was a 2.5. If I was to, I mean, I only read it a couple months ago, but I feel like it's probably a two. It's probably a two. Thing is, Oyun Can Breath Wait's writing is great, but this was just lacking anything for me. It's about this guy who gets thrown out from his girlfriend's house. So he moves in at his uncle's house. His uncle has passed away and there is his aunt there and another woman and a baby in a crib and they are both claiming that the baby is theirs. So no, it wasn't good. It's super short and I just feel like it didn't really go anywhere, but Oyun Can Breath Wait can write, can write. So the writing is good, but the plot and the pacing and just everything else about it wasn't. So I can understand this one. In fact, I probably agree, but it's quite high up. I mean, I've read worse books. Like I've read much worse books than a lot of these. Well, you know. So like even the ones I'm giving two stars, there are worse books. The one that comes to mind is The Gender Game. Can't remember if that's by, but if that's not on here, I'll turn some, like I will turn some tables. I'll do a Jesus and I'll turn some tables. Are we into the top three? I think we are. Okay, what is number three? Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. So third lowest rated with an average rating of 3.14. We're getting a low with 4,000 ratings is If I Disappear by Eliza Jane Bresier. I read this recently and it was so disappointing.  And this book is still too fresh for me to discuss in like in my disappointment. My disappointment is too fresh. She's not gonna go there. The ending was simultaneously predictable and unset up like no setting up for the ending. Didn't make sense in the story, but it was like the only ending that made sense. So like how is that possible? I don't know. The writing wasn't for me. I just listened to the audio book like super fast. I did not enjoy it and I'm sad, but I should have known because I knew I hadn't got real good reviews. And I thought maybe I'll be the outlier like I kind of was with these. I wasn't the outlier. I agreed with everyone. I've got two books in my head, The Gender Game and Rebel's The City of Inja by Kendall and Kylie Jenner. Probably the two worst books I've ever read. So if those aren't the top two, we're writing. What is number two?   I was angry. I was angry. And so we're not gonna have that. I'm at breaking point.   Not on my watch. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. The second lowest rated book. According to Goodreads and I've ever read Katherine House by Elizabeth Thomas with an average rating of 3.12 with 16,000 ratings. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Five stars. Five stars. What? Are you ridiculous? 3.12? I was angry. Here's the thing. Katherine House is weird. Maybe I should have expected this, but second lowest rated?   I loved Katherine House. I dream of this book. I think about it all the time. I think, God, what a great book. What a great book. And how I want something like this with its unhingedness, its surrealism, its strangeness. I'm actually fuming. I'm actually fuming because that means this book is great. Don't listen to anyone else. This book is amazing. If I could rate this five, 10 times I would, it came from my favorite shell. So that's all you need to know. I loved it. You were in the house and the house is in the woods. You were in the house and the house is in you. Kill me now. I want to reread this. I'm very upset. I'm very disappointed with you, Goodreads reviewers. Excuse me? If you get it, you get it. If you don't, you don't. I just don't want to tell you. If you get it, you get it. If you don't, you don't. If you know, you know. If you don't know, like I honestly feel bad for you. So what is the lowest rated book I've read? According to Goodreads. If it's not one of those two I mentioned, I will write, but that means one of them isn't on here. So like, how does that work anyway? Okay. Okay. Yeah. Correct. Correct. The lowest rated book I've read, According to Goodreads is Rebel City Avenger by Kendall and Kylie Jenner with an average rating of 2.99 with 1,300 ratings. Yeah, this is bad. It's about these twins, Lex and Livia. I wish I could burn this for my memory, but I can't. Lex and Livia, one lives in like the super great world and one lives underground and is poor and they're twins and they were separated birth and it's bad. If you want to watch my vlog, you can go watch it. I'll leave it linked. It was terrible. It was really terrible. I mean, it was ghost written, so you have no excuse because you could have, you have money. You could have hired a great ghost writer, but you didn't, but you didn't because it's bad. No plot. I mean, listen, the girlies just wanted to cash in on Hunger Games vibes. The ghost writer had to go with them to like New York Fashion Week or something and like follow them around with their friends and he got told like, base it off us. But like, everyone in this book is a villain. So how does that work, Kendall and Kylie Jenner? Explain it. Explain it. Deserving, I gave it one star obviously, deserving of its loneness. It's what she deserves.  No. So there we have it. That is the 10 lowest rated books I've read according to Goodreads. Let me know if you've read any of these and what you thought of them and also let me know what the 10 lowest rated books or some of the lowest rated books you've read are according to Goodreads. I think that'd be super interesting to find out. So let me know that in the comments down below. If he's gotten to the end, comment an i emoji, either the two or the one for this shatter me rip off. Yeah, and make sure you check out the Skillshare link. I'll leave a link down below. You get one month free, so make sure you check it out. And thank you so much for watching. I love you very much. I hope you had fun with this. I feel a bit emotionally scarred because of Catherine House, but I will see you soon in another video. Okay, bye.


There's me in past days before I had the beard. I think it might make me look younger, I'm not sure. So I'd like to talk to you this evening about physics. I'm going to talk to you about two aspects of physics. The physics of the very big and the physics of the very small. And there's two reasons I'd like to talk to you about these two areas of physics. Firstly, they're in of themselves interesting and lead to some really weird behaviors in the universe and our simple brains find it very, very hard to comprehend. And secondly, I'd like you to go away with the idea and the knowledge that between these two theories of the big and the small, there's an enormous gap in physics and we don't have one model that shows us how the entire world works. Now, physics is just an application of mathematics and physicists love to write everything down like this and use everything to mathematics, which is just the way that these sorts of people think. But when we take these equations a little bit further, we end up in some of the weirdness of the world. Now, when I stood up, you were kind enough to give me a round of applause, which I thought was very generous because you got no idea who I am and if I'm going to be any good and manage to explain these concepts to you.  So we think, if we're an acoustic engineer, we think, oh, there's vibrations in the air that go through to the ear. If we're a neuroscientist or a biologist, we think, well, these vibrations in the ear start to vibrate the ear drums on our ears and through the little bones and into the cochlear and into our brains, blah, blah, blah. If we're a physicist, we might think, well, hang on a minute, why were my two hands stopped? Why didn't my hands pass through each other? Why does my bottle of water stand there and not fall through? And we think to ourselves, I know the answer to that. I know it's because these things are solids, yeah? But actually, that's a contrary, that's a circular argument because the fact that they're solids is the reason they don't fall through each other. That's our definition. If we think back to our high school physics, everything in the world is made of atoms. Can someone tell me the constituents of an atom orbiting around the outside? We have electrons. Thank you very much, sir. Someone paid attention in physics at school. And right in the middle, we have a nucleus. Thank you very much. Made up of protons and neutrons. Now, we know from some work done by Ernest Rutherford that the nucleus is really small compared to the size of the atom. And in fact, if I take an atom and blow it up to the size of Munich, then the nucleus will be the size of a football. So the nucleus is really, really tiny compared to the rest of it. So there's a whole lot of free space. So the theories around in the early 1920s were that the electrons on the outside were appelling each other like two magnets and they couldn't go through each other. But when you start to do the maths behind that, you realize this isn't true. There's something else stopping them going through each other. And this is called the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Now, Pauli was one of these scientists. Now, this is from the 1920s in Copenhagen. It's an amazing picture. It's one of my favorite pictures. Unfortunately, you can see the misogyny around in the time. There's only one female amongst all of these people, Mary Curie. But these are some absolutely amazing scientists in the time they were trying to understand these problems in physics. They were also trying to understand something called the ultraviolet crisis. The ultraviolet crisis said that if I look at the way that this light bulb over here works and I apply my model of physics today, I should be getting so much ultraviolet light off this light bulb here that I should be getting sunburn stood here. I've also realized that when I'm doing this talk, I'm not here at that light, so I can't see you guys anymore. These models weren't working. There was something broken in the models. Einstein at the time, the most recognizable guy, sat here in the middle, was working on something called the photoelectric effect. And all of these people thought, well, there's another way that the world works. And Planck came up, Planck's here. Planck came up with this, sorry, Pauli is there, Pauli is there, Pauli is there. Pauli came up with this theory of the fact that things can't go through each other. And then Planck came up with a theory that everything's in quantum. Now, Edwin Schrodinger one day was out for a walk and Edwin Schrodinger could use these things much better than I can. And Edwin Schrodinger came up with this equation. Now, he was out for a walk with his girlfriend along a romantic pier somewhere and he was thinking through the mathematics behind quantum mechanics and what possible formula you could have behind it. He was not a very romantic guy and I should also add that at the time he was walking down the pier with his girlfriend thinking about quantum mechanics, but his wife had no idea where he was. But he came up with this equation. I'm not going to try and explain this equation to you because it's horribly complicated to try and apply any of these things. It's what we call a differential equation which means its answer is not a number, it's not a number 42. The answer to this equation is another and probably far more complicated equation. One number I'm going to point out to you is this number here. Does anyone know what this stands for? Imaginary number, exactly. With this work, we have to add in imaginary numbers. Now, they're called imaginary numbers because they don't exist. It's the square root of minus one and clearly minus one has no square root because you can't multiply two numbers together to get minus one because two minus is to make a positive. But mathematicians at the time, sorry, mathematicians before had thought this through and imagined what would happen if we were able to do that and give this a number and would this work and would this be useful and yes, this then became an incredibly useful tool that we were able to apply here. That gave us some more problems because when we start to apply this equation to the real world, we get these two weird problems. This you may have heard of is the famous dual slit experiment. This is where you shine a light through two slits and they give you interference patterns behind them. So as the light comes through, it gives me dark and light fringes of light and I know this works and I can do this experiment in the bath. If you sit in the bath and you make a couple of slits with some little rubber ducks in the bath and you're going to need something in the bath that vibrates so you probably want to take a friend with you as well, you can actually see this effect inside the bath but that equation I just showed you said that that doesn't just apply to waves. This should apply to particles because all particles act as waves. So if I start to put a single atom through one of these slits, it starts to behave in this weird way. But if I put multiple atoms through, I can understand them interfering with each other like the waves do, but if I put a single atom through from here, it behaves in these slit waves the only way the maths work is if that has passed through both holes at the same time. So this atom has gone through both holes at the same time and added itself back up together to the other side. Now this is really hard for us to understand because our brains evolved on the 10 meter scale of living on a savannah somewhere. And this is just weird and mad. And if I send a single one through, it's acting the same way and that just doesn't make sense. And if you do the maths, you say that it's gone through both and we say the states are superimposed on each other. It's done both things at the same time and the universe doesn't decide whether it's gone through the left slit or the right slit or whatever it's done until it's looked at by an observer. And then Edwin Schrodinger, he of The Romance, came up with this model and he said, well, what about if I fire it through the slits and it doesn't know where it's going to land and if it appears in place A, a cat dies and if it appears in place B, the cat doesn't die. But I have this in a complete sealed box and you've told me that it doesn't decide which one it went through to open the box. Well, that means the cat, if the cat were going to be killed it went through the left hand hole, doesn't decide whether it's dead or alive until it's looked at by a human being. So the maths tells us that this cat is both dead and alive at the same time. That's clearly mad, but it is the way the world works. Now, this we don't need to go into too much detail on. This is the standard model of physics. It's on the at CERN. This is trying to say what are the particles that the universe is made up of? What are we made up of? We're made up of these things over here. These make the nucleus, the electrons, these things that fly out of the sun. On the right hand side we have the forces in the universe but there's no gravity on this chart. This clearly upset those people in the picture I showed you earlier. Einstein at the same time was working on two theories of relativity. First, the special theory of relativity which is looking now at very fast things, looking at the speed of light and saying the speed of light is constant in the universe. If you do the maths behind that in the equations from a guy called Ernest Maxwell, you come out with the fact that E equals MC squared. This is his first theory. This is the simpler one in that I can understand maybe 10% of it. His second theory, which was the general theory of relativity, explained to us in his world how gravity works. This equation looks like this. What this equation is telling us, and I don't understand this, what this equation is telling us is that gravity isn't a force like the other forces. It's actually a warping of space and time. The Earth warps the space and time around it. A satellite orbits around the Earth because as far as the satellite is concerned space-time is warped and it's going in a geodistic, a straight line, the shortest line between two points. But if I apply this equation to the rest of the universe, I start to get some other really, really weird things happening. Imagine I'm a polevolta. I know it's hard to imagine, I don't look very athletic. I've got a 10 meter long polevolta on my shoulder. I'm going to run this through a garage that I store my car. It's got a door at both ends, but it's only 10 meters long. I can only open one door at a time. The first door or the second door. Clearly, I can't run through this garage with my pole. It won't fit. This equation tells me that if I run fast enough through the garage, I can get the pole through. And the reason is that the faster I move, the shorter I become. So not only time changes, but space changes. Again, this is hard for us to understand. Now, I've tried to test this in the real world in Germany. Now, luckily, I had an able assistant. My partner is German and really knows how to get the best out of a hire car when going up the autobahn, basically a binary right foot. But no matter how fast we go with that car, we are nowhere near the speeds that we need to go out to understand this. So this model is very, very confusing for our very simple brains again. And this is just to do with the environment that we grew up in. This also tells me that if I were to throw my friend David into a black hole, sorry, David, we would see time in different ways because both speed and acceleration and gravity affects time and the perception of time. So from David's point of view, although he's slightly crossed with me, I've thrown him into a black hole.  I don't see that because of the effect of gravity on time, on his time relative to my time, I see him getting closer and closer to the black hole but slowing down. So if he were talking to me, if he were closer to the black hole, he would go like this. He would never cross into the black hole. I would never be able to see him if I waited a million times a time in the universe. I would never see him. And what Einstein is telling us with this equation and these concepts is that there is no concept of now. Everybody's now is different. There's no universe or time across the universe. So we have these lovely, lovely two equations coming out from here. But we have a problem. When we look at the universe, we have this problem. Anyone know what this is a picture of? This is dark matter. We know that when we look at the universe, we know that there's more mass out there than we can see. So there's a problem with one of these two equations. One of these two equations is not telling us the way the world really works. We know there's dark matter out of there because if we look at a galaxy, so you know a galaxy, a big spiral arm galaxy, and it's spinning around on its axis, we know that in the center of this galaxy must be enough mass to keep all the stars in, not to spin out. But when we add up all the mass from the stars spinning around this center of this galaxy, there's not enough mass there. In fact, there's only 5% of the mass we'd expect to be there. So 95% of the mass is something that we can't see, can't detect, don't understand, and have absolutely no idea what it is. So if a physicist ever tells you they understand the universe, they're not a physicist. We don't even know what 95% of the universe is made of. This picture serves two purposes. There's another force out there called dark energy. And dark energy is something that is accelerating the galaxies away from each other. Because if we look at the galaxies and they all have gravitational attraction, they should all be sucking towards each other.  It doesn't do either of those things. The universe continues to expand and there's something in there called dark energy. It's called dark energy because, guess what? We have no idea what it is. Einstein's equation originally had another term here which he called the universal constant. And he added it to this equation because he thought the universe must have some sort of force pushing it apart. He then decided later on in life, looking at the facts that were coming in at the time from the universe, that that was wrong and he removed it from his equation. He called it the biggest mistake of his life. Which isn't too bad for your life, is it? That is your biggest mistake. After he died, though, we then had to add that factor back into this equation. So Einstein was wrong twice, which is quite an achievement. So here we have this equation, Schrodinger, our romantic guy. Down here we have our equation of relativity and they're very big. And in the middle, we have the best picture I could find of fridge magnets. And the reason I put that in there is because we can't explain with all of these equations a fridge magnet. Because the fridge magnet's stickiness to the fridge is magnetic force is governed by this equation. The fact that if it's not stuck on a fridge, it drops to the floor is governed by this equation at the bottom. And we don't have a holistic equation or a holistic way to describe the behavior of that fridge magnet. If I look at my mobile phone, which is somewhere in one of my pockets, I know that I've had someone has had to use this equation to define the microelectronics in there. And here are so small and so compact that it needs quantum mechanics to be able to understand it. It needs this equation. Why? Not that my phone is going very fast even when it's in the car with my girlfriend. It's because it has a GPS receiver in it and the GPS satellites orbiting around the earth go at a speed. Fast enough that this equation at the bottom has a tiny effect on the clocks in there. And we have to apply these relativistic equations corrections to the satellites to enable the GPS on the phone to work. So without both of these, my world wouldn't work. And this is why really I think I've wasted my life in insurance. It's paid the bills, but it's not been that interesting. What I'd really love to have done was worked on the gap between these two equations. Thank you very much. Yeah, we have five minutes for a few questions. Anybody has questions? Questions? Oh, I'm scared now. Hey! Falling into the black hole. He's speaking later. I hope he doesn't. Yeah. Is there anything to know? There is no now in the universe. So we can see that even the experiments done from Einstein's field equations are needing very accurate clocks. So putting atomic clocks on an airplane and flying the airplane around the earth. Now, because it did two things. Because it went up, its gravity changed, which has one effect on time. And because it was accelerating, it had another effect. They're actually in different directions, depending on which around the earth it goes. And when it landed, the clock that was on the ground and the clock that was in the airplane were indeed different. So there is no relative absolute now that I can say. So I can say that something, to me, happened 130 million years ago. Maybe the two recently detected gravitational waves. I think they were 130 million years ago. But that's my 130 million years ago. For that star, it might look different. So there is no concept of single time in the universe. So space and time are considered one complete thing. And we exist on a plane of space and time. So there is no consistent now. Why do they want to write in mathematics? That's a very good question. Because it's the only way to explain the universe. I've tried to explain it a little bit by waving my hands. But you can't then do any calculations off the back of it. So in the same way as an engineer building a bridge, they would look at the equation, they look at the weight of the bridge and how much force is on each of the components inside it. They're going to use mathematics to solve it. From a physics point of view, it comes down to mathematics to be able to solve the equations to come out with the answer. Now it's a really good question. There is a better way to look at the universe. And maybe there is a better way to look at the universe that wouldn't give me this horrible gap with my fridge magnets. I don't know. It's a good question. But it's the way that all the physics is built on mathematics. Last question. Hi. Yeah. I can't remember the movie. It might have been when I fell asleep. What was the ending of the movie quickly? Oh no, because that was it. And then you appeared behind a bookcase. It made no sense to me at all. There were some bits in it which I think were to do with time dilation weren't there? Is that the film where they got near to black holes? They had time dilation effects and stuff like that. Was it in that film? Yeah, that bit made sense. But at the end of it, it just, to my mind, it turned into a weird fantasy of psychological thriller or something. Yeah, so it was kind of cool. And then it went, uh, Hollywood. I have a question. You said that the cat... you cannot know if the cat lives or not. Yes. But the cat knows that it's living or not. Okay, so there's two models there. So the cat is in both alive and dead at the same time. So the cat could be two cats. So there's the many worlds interpretation quantum mechanics which says that every time one of these quantum events happens, the universe splits. And there are two universes. One with the cat dead, one with the cat alive. And therefore we live in one of these two universes. This kind of makes a little bit more sense to us, but it means imagine how many universes that have to be out there that every tiny, not just a decision that we make, but every quantum event generates a new universe. It's just an unbelievably massive amount of, um, infinities. Secondly, what does it matter if the cat knows whether it's dead or alive because it can't pass on the information until you open the box? Okay. Okay, guys. Great. Thank you for your attention. Really appreciate it. Thank you.


Hi everyone, Joe for Jaspy's casebreaks.com, coming at you with a team random that's going to help fill up Mosaic, basketball, pick your team one brand, your release just dropped today. It's a 13th spotter, and so we pulled the remaining 13 teams out of Mosaic 1, and now we're randomizing them to you, but we're just randomizing the names slightly different from a random team where we randomize names and teams. This we're just randomizing just your names, and name on top will get the highest price team that was remaining Pistons, so on and so forth. Good news is, is you're all guaranteed a team. It's not like one of those fillers are only the top X amount of people get something here. Everyone gets something. Plus, we're giving them a couple free spots too, which is nice. So if you bought a spot outright, you got a chance to win a couple of those spots right there. So let's gather these names in our first dice roll. Second dice roll will be matching up with the team. So first dice roll, top two after nine, six into three, nine times. Good luck. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and fingers crossed, ninth and final time. After nine, Daniel and Chris, congrats to both of you. After nine, you are in a, you just got like a little buy one, get one situation here. You bought one? You got an extra one. Now let's gather all these names again for a second and final dice roll and we'll, we'll match you up with the team after two and a one, three times. Easy. One, two, and three. After three, wow, look at that. Chris with the top three spots, congrats to you after three, the two and one. And here's how it all shakes out. Nice draw for Chris. Put a little rooftop next to your name so you know you won that spot. Congrats, Chris.  There you go. We'll see you in the next video for the break itself. Jaspy'scasebreaks.com. Bye-bye.


You can see it's stirring up a lot of dirt already. Yeah absolutely as it comes down. The effector thrust was actually perfected or first demonstrated properly and successfully back in 1960 by the British with the P-1127 and the Kestrel that led to the development of the AV-8B Harrier and that vehicle was 25 degrees back and that really does feel like you're going straight up inside the aircraft. Look at this, a big C-17 demonstration crew here from Washington State. First flown in 1991, September of that year, production for the United States military somewhere around 225 with another 50 or so with other air miles down. It comes to fuel efficiencies, one of the best at heavy lift in that department. It's also very friendly with respect to maintenance because the panels there rather than having big stands to get up on the side right there, you can work it all from ground level so maintenance technicians can take care of it. Let's call the turn here when it comes around. We'll see this 360 degree turn with the C-17. Again, a very large airplane showing you, what are we at there? We're on about 30 degrees of angle. They are about, yeah, and when you think of that they can do that if they're fully loaded and it's 585,000 pounds maximum gross weight. So what we're seeing today as a demonstration is if it were fully loaded. You bet, they can carry 102 fully equipped combat troops but they have done humanitarian missions where they have literally taken one patient from the battlefield. You'll watch these missiles open up. As soon as they touch down, they'll reverse the versions and this is about as much noise as this airplane will ever make. Here you go, let's see if we can hear them. They're going to come back through here by the crowd, that's what he said. Listening into our airbus, Ray Shaw. Mr. Ray Shaw. I can't stir it up a lot of dirt already. Yeah, absolutely, as it comes down like that. The idea of vector thrust was actually perfected or first demonstrated properly and successfully. Back in 1960, by the British with the P-1127 that led to the development of the AVAB Harrier and that vector. We should be able to hear the chase cars as they pull out on the runway. They're going to be kind of behind him here. And the wing is so long because as you mentioned earlier we're talking about how quiet the engine is above 70 up until recently. But the U2, this thing might actually pass down. Let's see if he gets a little bit lower this time. His mobile officer today is Lee Roy Matchen. He calls to let him get down to the ground. Play Lacy. They've been an aviation pioneer in honor of Play Lacy and they're racing Play Lacy right now. It's not just their hobby. The Boeing Super Steering.  Are they just going to pull back? Okay, good to go. Sorry. Do you have a pen and paper? Did you say paper here, sir? You need to depart the area of administration. FN, use your left, push the stick over just to the show. But we've got to get you on the ground because those people do want to talk to you. All right, so very, very gently now. Brought our guy out of the country then. Can't agree with them.