En we hadden meting in Washington D.C. En at die tijd was ik ook geïnvraagd in translating en legale philosophieke werk van een verhaagde Dutch-legale filosofa Hermann Dweerwier. En so ik geïnvraagd John Witty en zei, I'm coming to the United States, I have some time, if it makes any sense to you, then I could come down to Emery en we can talk about the translation. En so John invited me down. En at that time at Emery there was a professor Bergenthold, who is now a judge in the International Court of Justice, whom I'd known from human rights circles. And during my visit he invited me to spend a semester at Emery to do some teaching here. Professor Bergenthold then resigned from Emery and Emery then asked me to come for an entire year in order to take his classes while they find an appropriate replacement. And then at the end of that session, Emery offered me what they called an ongoing relationship, which means that I come here every second year to teach international human rights and giving them further opportunities of finding a proper replacement for Professor Bergenthold. But then finally in 1995 they offered me his position and offered me the IT Co-in Chair of International Law and Human Rights and so I decided to accept that and so came permanently to Emery in 1995. Well I was part of it right from the outset. The very first major conference was on Christianity and Democracy and that was shortly after my visit that I spoke of before so John Witty invited me to be part of that exercise. So I was part of that particular conference and after that was involved in all the major conferences and ventures of the Centre for the Study of Law and Religion except for one. The 1991 conference on Christianity and Democracy was an extremely outstanding event. There were so many participants from all over the world and the quality of the presentations were so so good that it really stimulated me tremendously and made me tremendously proud to have been part of that project. From it emanated some publications and one can always look back at one of the great great beginnings of John Witty's association with the Centre and I think that put his name on the map because what attributes to the success of John Witty is that he produced the goods. I think after that conference whenever John Witty wanted to organise something and had his mind set on some project he would get the money for it because of his tremendous organisational skills and the great success with which he carries out these different projects. Let me begin by saying that the Centre for the Study of Law and Religion is in my opinion the very best of it's kind in the whole world. I've travelled quite a bit. I've gotten engaged in other exercises in this field of law and religion and wherever I travel people know about the work of the Centre. So it is well marketed but particularly strikes people for the quality of the work that emerges from the Centre. That was from day one, from that very first conference we had on Christianity and Democracy. So the impact the Centre for the Study of Law and Religion has on the image of Emory is just throughout the world outstanding and so I think that we owe a very great debt to John Witty and the Centre and other people involved in the Centre for putting Emory on the map and making it a household name in many parts of the world largely through the activity of the Centre. In Afrika, I always took a particular interest in the state claiming for itself an authority to try to impose certain religious scruples on the entire community and that I found in conflict with basic calvinistic principles known as the doctrine of sphere sovereignty which basically says let the state mind it's own business and the church will mind it's let the one not step into the field of the other and this I found a valuable formula for thinking about church state relations it's not quite separation of church and state because from that perspective I don't think that church and state can be separated I think there's a strong symbiosis between law and religion and coming to Emory in a new environment, in a new setting with a new legal system different constitutional values I had to rethink quite a bit of my own critical perceptions that I had of the South African situation and try to apply that to the United States also becoming somewhat critical of the relationship between church and state in the United States which I also think is not quite the ideal situation and particularly also believing that a constitution is probably the most unexportable commodity that any country has and when communism was abandoned in Eastern Europe and again through my work with the center I was exposed to that experience it struck me that there was almost an urgency to imitate the American system of church state relations and that caused reaction in Eastern Europe I don't think it was properly suited for that part of the world with a different history and a different culture and so the reaction that one experienced in Eastern Europe against the strict separation of church and state the excessive freedom I always thought was just trying to impose too much freedom too quickly and so I have been critical of America trying to impose its perceptions of state church relations on the rest of the world or the rest of the world just wanting voluntarily to imitate that because I think that the way that you regulate these matters are deeply embedded in one's culture and traditions and the cultures and traditions of different countries are different I think if we look at the future in the field of law, religion, church, state there are several problems that are going to be with us for many years to come if you look at international instruments on freedom of religion or belief you will find the problems that emerge from the principle of the right to change one's religion or belief there are many of the mainstream religions in the world including Islam including orthodoxy even Roman Catholicism to some extent and other religions that do not believe that one has the right to change your religion or belief and while that is a principle enunciated in international instruments but not upheld in practice that is a problem that one would have to look at much more closely the second problem that I think is going to require quite a bit of attention is the relationship between church and state I think the final word has not yet been spoken at least on the international level because there are still too many countries left in the world where the separation of church and state or sphere sovereignty of church and state is not fully appreciated and where the state would claim for itself the right to impose a religion on an entire community or even religions wishing the state to do that and if you have a religious minority in any such country they are being marginalised and discriminated against and so this is a problem of which we haven't even remotely seen the end of the solution in the future we will have to pay much more attention to looking at this and the third that I might mention is what is known as the right to self-determination of religious minorities in different societies which is a basic principle of international law but is also not upheld in all the countries of the world even in many countries of the world and I think this might be the first next project that the centre for the study of law and religion might want to tackle which is very imminent so to put it in a nutshell there are so many problems left in the field of law and religion church and state that this centre still has a long long way to go ahead of it and many new ventures that are begging to be further explored so far all the projects that the centre has undertaken has been done with such great significance and involving so many people from all over the world and so that if you were to ask me who would be best equipped to tackle any of these projects in the future I would without any hesitation say the centre for the study of law and religion it is in my opinion the best of its kind in the whole world it is the best equipped to do that and it has the leadership to achieve positive results academically and otherwise we are talking about these problems on the academic level but one also hopes that through doing that something of it will filter through into actual practice and I might also say that through my experience working with the centre I've always been surprised how people with the most divergent religious views if they come to the point of conversation find how much we have in common I think that we are inclined to emphasise the differences between this or that religious perceptions but there is so much in common that we can build upon in order to create good relations and in order to explore the solution to these problems in much deeper depth Before I came to Emory I never met Professor Hal Berman I shouldn't admit this but I didn't know his existence to be frank When I met him at Emory it was just admiration from day one the energy that emerges from him and what he has meant for the reputation of Emory University because he in his own right is a world famous figure and it is a great asset for Emory to have such a person upon our faculty and over the years I came to work closer and closer with him so that he and I are now co-directors of the world law institute of Emory University planning a very very big conference for next month and it was such a great pleasure to work with him and doing that to learn of his tremendous insights and evaluation of religious values he is a man that is personally deeply religious the example that he sets is inspiring to others and this is through his personal life and not only through his academic work his academic work is outstanding it is amazing that a man of his age can still be so tremendously productive I've also sat in some of his lectures he from time to time asked me to lecture to his students and just seeing the admiration that the students have for this great man and what he can convey to them through his world knowledge his experience his insights but also his humility as a deeply deeply religious Christian and so I found him a great great inspiration and again I want to emphasise working with him as co-director of the world law institute of Emory University is one of the greatest privileges that I can imagine any person could have had few years ago I became marginally involved with efforts of a group of Christians in China to try to persuade their government to adopt a law on religious freedom the background to this was that the China had just signed not yet ratified but signed the international covenant on civil and political rights so these groups of young Chinese believers thought that this was an appropriate time to convince the Chinese government to adopt a law on religious freedom and so they came to Baltimore and met with some people from the United States and I was included in that particular gathering I also had to make a presentation and by the way my presentation the essence of it was if you want to sell a law on religious freedom to the Chinese government don't follow the American model because that would be too much freedom too soon if you come from a background where the state controls religion and you suddenly want to take every bit of control away from that government then they're not going to accept your proposals and at the time I propose to them to look at a new law on religious freedom of Poland which guarantees lots of freedom a great deal of autonomy for religious institutions but still under some state control and that is kind of the first step to forge a regime of freedom of religion or belief now I no longer engage in that particular venture but that has provoked in me an interest in what is happening in China and I think that is a world that is vacant for the centre for the study of law and religion to go into to make contact with this group and other groups and to try to expand the whole problem and interest in the law and religion in that particular community and I mentioned this former involvement with the Chinese people just to show that there are people in China who would really appreciate tremendously some initiative of the centre in their part of the world and addressing the kind of problems which they confront in looking at state control state repression even of religious freedom I think an institute like the centre for the study of law and religion begins their exercise through academic discourse because we are an academic institution and are primarily interested in the academic side of law and religion, church and state but by talking about that studying, holding conferences and publishing a message goes out and this message impacts on the lives of people so even though you might say we want to remain academic that's not possible because if you are truly academic and if you are truly doing your work well as the centre has been doing so far then it really has a practical impact on the lives and on the institutions of the communities where they work and which they study so from academic interest to practical implementation to influence upon the hearts and minds of people is not worlds apart that is very closely related given my South African background I've always been inclined to be excessively critical of the establishment and I think in South Africa for good reason when I came to the United States I also found much that can be criticised also in the field of church state relations I don't think that the United States Supreme Court has found a clear answer to the relationship between law and religion, church and state and this is borne out by the fact that almost every new appointee to the US Supreme Court uses the very first opportunity that they get to rewrite the principle to put a different nuance on the principle that should govern law and religion church and state within the United States and I think that is so because the present system proceeds on the false premise that law and religion can be separated which I think is a false premise and if you start on the false premise then you end up with all kinds of anomalies contradictions which the next US Supreme Court judge tries to remedy by rewriting the court versus lemon test of state church relationships and so this is a wonderful field of study for the United States this system or the idea of separation of church and state has been applied to good ends but I think sometimes also in a way that is subject to criticism and this is something that again coming to the United States opened a whole new field of inquiry to me and to my own inquisitive mind I am extremely critical of the point of view advocated by the United States in regard to the International Criminal Court I was part of the Rome conference and so I saw the American delegation in action and I know that the one thing that the United States insisted upon was a right of veto of prosecution of American nationals in the International Criminal Court and this came to be known as American exceptionalism and the American delegation always tried to explain why the United States should be treated differently from any other country in the world and the international community would not buy that but what is even worse is that the insistence of the American government on writing a clause into the statute of the ICC that would give it a veto of the prosecution of American nationals was successful in the sense that the United States can preclude the prosecution of any American national in the ICC simply by conducting a bona fide investigation into the allegation of wrongdoing if they done that came to the conclusion there is no probable cause don't proceed with the prosecution it's just fine the ICC cannot step in and prosecute it's only if it turns out that the United States is unwilling or unable to prosecute that the ICC can step in so the United States simply wouldn't take yes for an answer and that I find most unfortunate because the contribution that the International Criminal Court can make in order to prevent atrocities committed by political leaders in the world I think is tremendous and for the United States to try to undermine the court I think is most unfortunate


So, we're on YouTube again, and this is the House Healthcare Committee. It's Friday, March 12th, about 12.30 after taking a break. We've been in the process of reviewing final markup on House Bill 210, which is the bill that addresses health disparities and working toward health equity. We have invited Susanna Davis, who is the Director of Racial Equity for the State of Vermont, to join us and who is an integral part of the proposal that's in front of us, or she and her office. And so, Susanna, we haven't had a chance to chat, but what I wanted to say was simply that we appreciated your input in our committee on a number of occasions now, but we have crafted a proposal that I believe is consistent with what we last talked about, and in fact works with your office and your position to help move forward the idea of establishing an office of health equity. And I think I've sent to you the most recent draft. Have you had a chance, did you receive that, and have you had a chance to see that? I'm hoping. It is very likely that I did receive it, but unfortunately, I didn't see it. I am losing the battle, I can see in box. Oh, yeah. We can appreciate that greatly. Yeah, I've just done quick search for you, and I don't see anything unread, but it might have come from somewhere else. Okay, well then, oh dear, my apologies. Come from Katie or from Colleen, if you're looking for an inbox name. It should have come from me. Yesterday afternoon. Got it. I think I see that. Yep, I do. Apologies for not getting to that before today. Well, believe me, we're, we're all operating in a similar sphere of. Many things coming at us and deadlines ahead of us, right ahead of us. So, let's go ahead, Ian. I was just going to suggest that Katie would be the quickest to be able to point to exactly the section of the bill that is most relevant. I would welcome Katie for you to do that and that would help orient both Susanna to the bill where it's involving her and her office. Sure. Do you want me to put it up on the screen or just direct you to where the language is. We're looking in section three of the bill. And that, let's see, my document has been marked up by today's changes, but around page. 14. Section 252 health equity advisory commission. I think it might like to leave it to Susanna, you and Katie to walk through and identify the key places. And let us listen while you're getting the opportunity to. I think it's important that we reoriented this to what we had talked about or what this bill now proposes. So I think another key part is under the powers and duties of the commission. But Katie, you can help guide us. Sure. So in. So in section, take the lead on that, whatever works best for you, Susanna. I've just gotten up to see, to subsea now. Powers and duties. Okay. Okay. So, does it help if I kind of give you an overview as you read through? Yeah, please. Okay. So. C1. Looks at kind of the short-term duties. Of the commission with regard to providing recommendations and guidance for setting up an office of health equity. Making recommendations on structure, and then there are specifics that require recommendations, including whether the office will be independent, how it will be staffed, the population served in issues addressed, duties of the office, how grant funds will be managed and distributed and the time frame and necessary steps to establish the office. From there in subdivision to it's the duty of the commission to provide invite advice and make recommendations to the office once it's established. And there's a list of what the commission would provide advice on to the office once there is an office. And then subdivisions three, four and five in this subsection A would be ongoing responsibilities of the commission. So and three and four were in the bill as introduced. So you probably had read through those at one point, but reviewing monitoring and advising all state agencies regarding the impact of current and emerging state policies, procedures, practices, laws and rules. And then in four identifying and examining the limitations and problems associated with existing laws, rules, programs and services related to the health status of the communities identified. And then there's a new responsibility in five, which is providing advice and recommendations on cultural competency and anti-racism within the healthcare system through training and continuing education requirements. This has assistance and subsection D assistance for the commission coming from the agency of administration. And this has an annual reporting requirement. The committee has contemplated language here that the recommendations of the advisory commission would be based on data collected and analyzed pursuant to the next section. It has your position executive director of racial equity calling the first meeting of the commission to occur on or before September 1, September 1, 2021. And then I think the other language has remained the same in this section. And then there's also language in section 253 data responsive to the health equity inquiry. And the language here talks about each state entity that's collecting health-related data to collect disaggregated data by race, ethnicity, gender, identity, age, primary language, socioeconomic status, disability, and sexual orientation. And it also says that data related to race and ethnicity is to show you separate collection categories disaggregated beyond the categories of nonwhite and white. And this is to be based on recommendations made by the executive director of racial equity and consultation with the advisory commission. And then I'm going to skip down to section four. This is existing law that lays out the duties of the executive director of racial equity. And this adds a new subdivision four that says that another duty of the executive director is temporarily overseeing and chairing the health equity advisory commission until an office of health equity is established. And then in section five of the bill, this is a one-time report that the health equity advisory commission is going to do by October 1st of 2022 with regard to making recommendations for improving cultural competency and anti-racism and Vermont's health care system through initial training, continuing education, education requirements and investments. And then in section six, it's a two-part section, but in this fiscal year, $180,000 is appropriated to the agency of administration from the general fund for use by the executive director of racial equity and carrying out the provisions of this act. And then in subsection B, there's legislation language that a similar appropriation will need to be made in future fiscal years until the office of health equity is established. And that's it for the bill. The last section is effective date. Thank you very much for that. It was very, very useful. And looking through it for the most part, it looks very comprehensive. I'm wondering if the herdium section can be updated. I recognize that there had been a change from the bill as introduced that raises the cap on per diem from three meetings annually. Actually, it does more than that. It calls for more than three meetings and raises the cap on per diem for those meetings to six meetings annually. And I'm wondering if we can just make that something to the effect of for as many meetings as the stated funding permit. I feel strongly that asking people, especially the listed people, the 28 listed people, many of whom are people of color and are leaders in the community who are often asked to do this kind of labor for little or no remuneration. And I feel strongly that giving every opportunity that we can to fairly compensate for this work might be as simple as saying until the money runs out or something like that. Thank you for flagging that. That's actually on my list of something that I wanted us to still tend to, because we had talked about, and I think you actually had used the phrase process equity, which made a big impact on my thinking. And when I didn't realize until quite looking at it again, that the number had been changed, but it still had a stated number of meetings. And I would personally support some language to the effect. Some, some find some other language that allows for the commission to determine within the funds appropriated to determine how often to me. And. Thank you. So I think, I think we shouldn't have that. I have lots of circles around that right now. So. I think that that's an important change. Are you chairing? No representative. A representative Goldman has a question for. Susanna. Okay. First, I want to ask Susanna before we take any questions as to whether you have other. Thoughts or suggestions based on. The opportunity that you've just had to review this, but. I don't know. I don't know. Knowing there may be others. I'm going to say for, for right now, no, I'm happy to take a representative question. Just while I let this. Yeah. That sounds good. Representative Goldman then represent Gina. We talked about remuneration for, well, no, we didn't talk about it, but we talked about creating work groups within the commission and remuneration for people doing work group. Commitments. And I would like to include that in some way. So I don't know if it has to be specific or not. Yeah. Thank you for that. That was kind of, that was going along with, with that thinking was, are the six meetings just of the larger group or of the sub committees included. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Is it six per person manually? And, and if we have to bring in outside experts or what have you, you know, how does all that factor in? So those are. Those are certainly open questions that I think are worth considering here. Thank you for raising that. Can I ask my question now? It looks like Bill might have froze. No, I was just, I was just wanting to step in and say that I'm supposed to present at one o'clock to the appropriations committee on the financial end of this. And I wanted to just share what my thinking was. I had some conversation with Susanna at a previous point in time, but, but to suggest that the. That there be a consulting that, that there be funds for hiring a temporary, not a permanent position, but temporary either person or persons or a consulting group or some, somebody to assist under the direction of Susanna. And was thinking in terms of tying that to. I'd say to four. 140,000 dollars at that level. Perhaps then an additional. 10 to $20,000 of administrative and other expenses that would be used to perhaps bring in. Other expert consultants, et cetera. And then another $20,000 for per diem. For, for per diem use within the. But I would see that as both within the commission, as well as the work group. And then we haven't, it's not all calculated out exactly to a dollar specific dollar amount, but I think. I'm going to make that recommendation to the appropriations committee within the range of under $80,000. Hopefully that can accommodate some of what's being, what we're talking about here. Can I ask my question now? And they will, they will have other questions that I probably won't have all the answers to. Yeah. Sure. I don't know again, Suzanne. I don't know if that's, I mean, that I think that's pretty consistent with what we, we had talked about somewhat previously. Yeah. Okay. Brian. So I just, you know, you mentioned in your testimony today. That. Very, it's very common for. You know, you know, when we impacted people, especially by Poc to be asked to do extra work and not compensated. And I feel like. In your role that's happened where we hired, you know, we hired a, um, a director of racial equity and then gave a massive amount of work to that position. Um, Uh, and we, there's, there is talk of expanding. The work of the director and giving the director an office and more support. Um, I just wanted to, um, provide it to hand a piece of that work to the office of racial equity director, you know, to set this up. And I guess I just want before we move forward with it, I haven't heard you express any objection. Um, I just wanted to give you a chance to weigh in on that specifically and just make sure that if you, if. If we're going to give the position of the director of racial equity, this work that we're also giving the proper support. I don't know if there's anything you need to say or want to say about that, but I wanted to make sure I asked before I voted on this. Thank you, representative. Um, the work has to be done. And I'm here. So. We got to get it done. I mean. It is a lot. I don't pretend, um, I don't pretend that one person or three people can, uh, necessarily balance everything that needs. To be done in and for Vermont. But, um, one thing that I, one thing that I can say I'm relieved about this year and seeing the aftermath of the pandemic is that oftentimes when we face crises or budget shortfall, one of the first things to get cut is equity work. And, uh, I think this year I'm very pleased to say that we have a legislature and an executive administration that has demonstrated the opposite that we're looking to expand this equity work. Um, we're looking to expand this equity work because we can't recover unless we're recovering equity. And so it's not an ancillary part. It's a necessary part. So, uh, all that said, I, I, um, and grateful for the trust that you all are putting in, in the racial equity office for this work. And, um, we're going to do the best that we can. I'm sorry if that was a strange non answer, but. I just want to make sure that we're, I just want to make sure that we're working from you that you are, you're, you're welcoming the work and you see it as part of the overall goal of your office. And I guess the only thing I would encourage is that when you need the financial help. Um, don't be afraid to ask because we will advocate for it. I can't speak for everyone, but I would advocate for it, you know, because I want to make sure that we're properly funding the work too. Can I, can I step in and say, and I speaking, I'm just going to say I just want to make sure that we're doing the right thing because when we sent our budget recommendations to the appropriations committee, we said, uh, we said, we wanted to fund this temporary work that at the time had a place, save her in about a hundred thousand dollars, but we also said that that was contingent on the full funding of the two additional positions in your office. That if we, if the, that. Your office cannot take this on from our point of view, committee had to do in order for us to be able to consider taking this next step and asking you to take on this additional transitional responsibility. So we as a committee, and I will reiterate that in the appropriations committee today as well, that the funding of those two additional permanent positions is a necessary prerequisite to moving forward with our proposal for this Office of Health Equity transition work. So I welcome any further thoughts. And I'll just, maybe I'll just cut to the chase. I think you've said this, Susanna, but it's like when we were going over this yesterday, the question was raised, has the Office of Racial Equity agreed that if we are successful in this, that they are interested and willing to take this on? I said, well, let's have that straight up discussion because it had been referred to and implied in some ways when you visited well as previously, but today is that I hear you saying, I believe I hear you saying that you would support taking on this additional work, presuming that your office has the other support that's intended as well. Yes, and if I may, I might just add one thing to that that I've hesitated to say until now, but it's Friday and it's getting cold. I would say yes, I would welcome the opportunity, but I would ask the committee and the legislature and I guess the state in general to be prepared slash understanding in the event that the time limit might need to shift. Yeah. I think we are ready for the stage where we want to get it right. More than we just want to get it done fast. And I respect that the rulemaking process generally does rely heavily on deadlines and timelines, but I would also just put a note in here that it's very possible that we may ask for those to shift. And I'm going to thank you all in advance for the understanding and the flexibility in that. I appreciate you saying that. And we haven't had this particular discussion, but that would be consistent, I believe with the intent of our committee to have the work done right and not just to meet an artificial deadline, but we would be trusting on the collective judgment of your office and the commission members to advise us as to what the practical implications of that are so that we could work together on that. Thank you. Okay, well, actually the timing is actually fortuitous because I'm being asked to come to appropriations in a few minutes. You don't get to eat, but the rest of us want a lunch break. Well, that's good for everybody, I suppose. But actually my question was whether I was, yeah, okay, well, I think that's the place for us to stop right now then. And so I will, maybe, Susanna, could you stay on video just for a minute and let me check in with you as others are leaving to get their lunch and I'm welcoming you to go get your lunch. But I'd like to just touch base with you a minute more before I leave the screen, if I can. Could we just verify one more coming back? Two-thirty. Two-thirty. Come back at two-thirty. Thank you. Okay, great. Thank you for all your work this morning. And I want to actually, before you go, I want to thank Representative Donahue for stepping in and helping to facilitate the committee this morning. I really appreciate that, Representative Donahue. And that was greatly appreciated by me. Okay, I'm going to crop your quick email just so you know it's coming. Great. Oh, let me say, so we need to integrate language in that compensation section on page 18 or whatever that number is that revises. Page 19. Item H, I believe. Compensation. Yeah, H, yeah. We must not forget that in order to be consistent with what our conversation just has taken place with Susanna as the director of racial equity. Okay.


Let's jump in with Klaus. Let's listen. Here is his interpretation of what the great reset means. And notice how this is all set up.  So, oh, I forgot to say, whoa, before I say it, before we go there. Why the great reset? Why the whole point of this is, we have an opportunity. What was it? Rami Manuel said, I'm sure he was citing somebody else, never let a crisis go to waste. Never let a crisis go to waste. What is the crisis? Well, the crisis is COVID. The great reset is the reset to the global political and economic system, post COVID. So, as you'll hear, we have learned certain things about the world, what the world can do, what the world can get away with, what is good for the world, what is bad for the world. We've learned all these things from COVID. We're going to exit COVID. As we exit COVID, we need a reset. We need to change the world. Never let a crisis go to waste. This is the crisis that cannot go to waste. This is the reset that is now going to move us forward, right? That is now going to provide the opportunity, the opportunity for these people to do what they want to do, to do what they think is right, to do what they think needs to happen in the world. All right, so let's listen to Klaus. We are at a turning point of humankind. We're at a turning point of humankind. Notice, the COVID has created a turning point in humankind. Why? I don't think he's going to tell us. We just know it is a turning point. It's an opportunity, never let a crisis go to waste. I think we should not underestimate the historical significance of the situation we are in. We know the world will look differently when we move out from the acute face of the virus into a new situation. Now, we have three options for the new situation. So notice, this is all about we, we, global we, this is not even a country we're here, it's a true global we. We are going to move out of the crisis and we have three options on kind of what is our behavior going to be post-crisis. What could we do post-crisis? Now, you know what I think we should be resetting the world is towards more capitalism, more individualism, more self-interest, more of the things that create values, that make it possible for us to value and to enjoy those values. Note what his three options are going to be. He'll start with the option that he least likes. So first one is set all the negative aspects which we have seen during the crisis and I refer to the egoism which has increased I would say on an international national but also let's face it on an individual level. So notice, I mean this guy is intellectual, he gets it and he gets what the terminology needs to be and to him the number one problem is if we embrace egoism. Now, what does he consider egoism? Well, what he considers egoism in this context is that people, it's like Kugman's article about Ayn Rand. Do you remember Kugman's article about Ayn Rand? Egoists don't care about other people. Egoists don't wear, never wear a mask. Egoists sneeze at other people just to get them infected because who cares about other people, right? That's egoism and of course egoism means on a state basis that countries don't coordinate with one another, that countries do different policies from one another, that some countries don't play along. But he says on a personal level, so the first step is attack egoism. That is step number one. These guys know what they're doing.  That is incompatible with the post-COVID world. So, this negative tendencies will even increase, will continue. I would say in this case, I'm very concerned about the life of my grandchildren. So, and we'll get to the life of his grandchildren a little bit because this is important to him. Notice that he doesn't have to say anything to prove that egoism is bad. He just states it. He just states it. So, egoism is bad and we don't want it and it has bad consequences and egoists don't care about his grandchildren and an egoistic policy post-COVID is destructive and bad and he doesn't have to say in what way it's bad. He doesn't have to articulate the case because all he has to say is egoism and that triggers in people an immediately negative response, an immediate negative response. That's all he has to count and this is... So, second situation is this is why our job is so difficult. Those of us who believe in egoism, proper egoism, those of us who believe in Iron Man's philosophy, those of us who are trying to argue for Iron Man's philosophy is if we talk about egoism, what's triggered in people's minds is exactly what Klaus assumes is going to be triggered in people's minds. We then have to explain, we have to articulate, we have to show them that it's the opposite of what... Not the opposite, that's wrong. It's completely different. It's in a sense in a different dimension than his conception of egoism. Somebody, you know, somebody asked me, I saw a comment somewhere, maybe it was under Lex Friedman's, under the podcast, somebody says, oh, all we need now this guy's telling us people are not egoistic enough, really? Not selfish enough, really? Yeah, that's exactly what I'm telling you. Because to me, selfishness is not about, not about, and this is important particularly for you guys who are relatively new to this, selfishness is not about doing what you feel like doing. It's not about following your emotions, your desires, your whims. Egoism is about taking your life seriously. Egoism is about pursuing, thinking, figuring out what your values are and should be, and pursuing them rationally with reason. Egoism means again, taking your life seriously, which means thinking, using your mind, being rational, pursuing values rationally. How many people do that? On a global scale, how many people do that? I mean, maybe some of you guys do it, but how many people regularly live it, do it constantly? Almost nobody. And that's why, yes, we need more selfishness in the world because more egoism in the world, because there's not a lot of it right now. There's very little of it. This superficiality, this women worship, there's people driven by emotions, but what there isn't, what there isn't is real egoism. All right, let's, let's keep listening to Klaus. So people assume we are just going back to the good old, whoops, sorry, which we had, and everything will be normal again in how we are used to normal in the old fashioned. This is fiction. It will not happen. The cut, which we have now is much too strong in order not to leave traces. So option number one is we become more egoistic. And I think, I think his view on a, on a, on a international scale, that probably means we moved more towards right wing authoritarianism. Option number two is we go back to normal the way it was before COVID. And he says, that's not going to happen. It's just not going to happen. Too much has happened. Too much is involved. We're not going back to normal. So what is option number three? All right, we're up to Klaus is saying we can't go back to normal. Why? Well, because normal was COVID has changed everything he says. He doesn't say why. Now I agree with him. We're not going to go back to normal. COVID has proved a lot of things. We'll talk about some of the things that's proved among them that were sheep, among them that will tolerate authoritarianism in ways that we nobody could have imagined. You know, and, and he will say that COVID has proved that we can do public private partnerships, that corporations and government can work together, all these things. So COVID has changed the mindset of the world and of Americans. COVID has changed the mindset of politicians in terms of what they think they can get away with. Thank you, Alex. COVID has changed the world in which we live. It is true. We are not going back to the way things work. And look, the way things work was not great. A mixed economy is never great. A mixed economy has to go somewhere. A mixed economy, for those of you new to the concept, is a mixture of some freedom and some control, some capitalism and some socialism. But a mixed economy never stays put. It either moves towards socialism or towards capitalism. The egoism he's expressing is moved towards capitalism. He says, that's not going to happen. I don't think that's going to happen. I agree with him. The alternative is to stay where we are. That's not going to happen. Then are we moving towards more socialism? A type of socialism? Let's listen to where he wants us to move. And then we have a certain possibility to construct a new concept based on the learnings, on the observations we have seen and to create really a more resilient, a more inclusive and a more sustainable world. More resilient, more inclusive and more sustainable. More resilient, more inclusive, more sustainable. We'll come back to some of these ideas. What does that mean? What does that mean to be more resilient, more sustainable, more inclusive? These are the terms you're going to hear a lot of in the next few years. These are the terms you're going to hear a lot of from the Biden administration. These are going to be the words you're going to hear from AOC and from the people on Biden's left are going to be pushing and tugging and pulling him leftwards. And who are going to be putting him right and right on what issues? That's going to be the challenge. But let's see what this breaks down to, what this actually involves. That will be achieved. Professor Schwab sets out five priorities that should be built into the great reset. Five things, five priorities. The first one is we have to redefine our social contract. We define the social contract. Now, for those of you who don't know what the social contract is, the social contract is this abstraction that comes from, I think it comes from Housseau. I think it comes from Housseau. And it's an idea that you and the state, when you're born into the state, you've got a contract.  And in exchange, depending on the social contract, what you believe the social contract should include, it should include the kind of free market social contract. Ask, I don't really believe in a social contract. You can't have a contract which you didn't sign. It's the idea that the government will protect you from force, will protect you from coercion, will protect you from authority, will protect you from your neighbor trying to steal your stuff. But the social contract has evolved from that idea, which I don't think was ever Housseau's idea, that's kind of the free market interpretation of it, to this idea of, well, we need to guarantee your basic income and we need to give you your job and we need to give you your healthcare and we need to give you all. But there's a contract. There's this relationship between the state and the individual and we need, Klaus tells us, we already have a pretty broad social contract. We pretty have a lot of responsibilities from the state.  You signed a contract. You have to buy it.  Don't step out of line. Don't be too radical. Don't say the wrong things.  That's the whole idea of a social contract. So when I, a lot of times when people, when I give a lecture or something, people say, well, what about the social contract? Right? You have accepted these terms. Why are you challenging them? And I'm going, I never accepted them. When did I accept them? Show me my signature. Show me my choice. I didn't choose to be born, was born into this world. And I believe when you're born into this world, you're born free. You're born with rights.  I didn't sign a contract. There is no contract. So there's already, in a sense, an expansive view of the social contract. Klaus, a good friend, Klaus, wants to refrain that. Thank you, Matt. Thank you, Donna. Thank you, John. Thank you, Ed. Thank you, Alex. Really appreciate it.  Integrate more inclusion. We also have to make sure that we integrate much more in a social contract, our responsibility towards the next generation. So more inclusive, more inclusive is the whole social justice. More inclusive is codeword for, you know, the whole Black Lives Matter, systemic racism, all of that. We need to make sure that everybody is included, everybody benefits, everybody is supported, everybody moves forward. It really is a concern with the big issue, which he doesn't name, but it's the big issue, one of the big, I'd say the three big issues, three big agenda items that they have. I'll get to that later. But one of them is inequality. An inclusive means no inequality or less inequality. We need to get rid of the inequality that exists. Inequality is a huge problem. Being more inclusive means less inequality. Cannot just think of the debt. Leave all the solutions and to be paid for by the next generation. He's actually talking about the debt here, and the debt is too high, and we're leaving the debt to future generations. I find this interesting, because no way in the program, in the great reset, do I see anything about how you deal with that debt? How they propose to deal with that debt? Thank you, Mark. Thank you, Skyler. That's great. Thank you, Adam. That's fantastic. And thank you, Lester. So they don't, they never mentioned how they're going to deal with the debt. The debt is just, we shouldn't burden future generations with it. How do you do that? Nobody ever says. So the social contract, and in the social contract, we also have to look at one specific issue. So COVID will create again a gap between the so-called industrialized and emerging countries. So it's not just inequality between people. It's inequality between countries. Inequality between countries, by the way, that has been closing rapidly as the developing world has become richer, has become less poor, has become more free. But that's not good enough for them. They are worried, and it's true actually, that COVID might increase that inequality. I actually don't think it will. I think poor countries have done better with COVID than rich countries, because rich countries can afford to shut down, whereas poor countries haven't. So economically, they've taken a lot less of a hit from COVID than rich countries. So I don't think the economic so-called inequality will expand under COVID. But he does, and he's worried, and he wants more, more shrinkage of inequality on a global scale. Now that's, that's ambitious, guys. That's ambitious. As emerging countries, at least some of them suffering much more compared to some of the countries which have a well-established social safety net. Second, it's a decarbonization of the economy to... So being more inclusive means to, A, reduce inequality. Second, it's to decarbonize the economy. Now, I've often said the only way to decarbonize is to die.  So the only time you stop emitting carbon is not just when you're dead, but when you actually decomposed, because the decomposition process, I think, emits carbon as well. So yeah, decarbonize the economy. Good luck with that. Hectors against, say, an environmental virus. And here, we will publish tomorrow, by the way, report, which shows clearly there is no contradiction between taking care of nature and particularly creating the need to create jobs and to invigorate the economy. So notice the massive Keynesian fallacy here, and it's not just Keynesian, it's this idea that what creates wealth, what creates jobs, what creates economic activity is money printing. It doesn't matter what the job is. It doesn't matter how productive it is. It doesn't matter what its real value is, but that the government could just engage in infrastructure projects, in this case infrastructure products that decarbonize us to benefit nature somehow, that that is good economics. This is a huge issue. You're going to hear more and more about this. This is something that people like Paul Krugman are going to make a big deal out of it and going to use their Nobel Prize in economics to really highlight and to say, look, I'm a Nobel Prize winning economist. I know what this is, right? David says, printing money is a debt placed on the unborn, yet, well, it's a debt placed on all of us and the unborn. Don't forget, you're going to have to pay for it, your children who are already born, your grandchildren who might be already born, and future generations who are unborn, right? It's a debt on people, multiple generations. And he has audacity to speak about caring about the next generation. Guy is walking around with billions and wants us to shoulder the burden of helping the emerging world. Why doesn't he? Well, let's say he does, still doesn't give him an excuse to enslave us, to pursue values he believes in. Travis, thank you, really appreciate that. But absolutely, David, I mean it's the fact that these people claim to care about future generations as they're destroying them. Now, he will argue that he wants to tax and that's how he's going to reduce the debt. He wants to print money to spend on infrastructure, climate change, nature, and at the same time tax the wealthy. Now, if you know even a little bit of math, you know that that doesn't add up, but that doesn't stop them. Reality has never stopped these people. Never stopped these central planners, authoritarians, little dictators. I don't know if Klaus Schwab is little, but he's a little dictator anyway. He hasn't stopped them from wanting to control our lives and run our lives for us. All right, let's keep going. So this is still under his five priorities. This is still the first priority. Social contract built into the second one. Green economy, but number three. So the second one was green economy. So the first is reframing the social contract to be more inclusive and to include future generations, particularly as we'll see when it comes to climate change. The second one is to establish a green economy. Green economy means windmills and solar and whatever. Yeah, it really means a dramatic decline in standard of living and quality of life, and it means decarbonization. Carbon is the enemy. Carbon is evil, and we need to decarbonize. So that's the green economy, and it means massive investments. Only government can make those investments. Needs massive printing of money or taking on government debt. That's what's needed. That's what needs to happen. Third, what is number three? So that's the major part also of the book, because you know, I published four years ago, the book, The Force Industrial Revolution. All those technologies are very much advanced now by COVID. The technology is advanced by COVID. I mean, notice that you'll see the collectivistic way technology is treated and the deterministic way in which progress in technology is going to be defined. By the way, technology didn't advance because of COVID. I mean, there was extra investment in it. There were certainly improvements in it. There was massive use of it. There was scaling up of it. But technology itself, what are you talking about? Digitalized, which can be digitalized. So how can we use the technologies to address the challenges, but at the same time, make sure that we create a necessarily ethical human oriented principles around those technologies? Now remember, ethical means altruistic. Ethical means what you do for other people. Ethical means sacrifice the able, sacrifice those who do, sacrifice those who have sacrifice ability to none, right? That's what sacrifice means. That's what ethical means in their framework. Sacrifice means for them. I mean, ethical means for them.  By the way, where were we? Yes, we were close, close. Keep going close. Son, finally, what is the role of companies? Not finally, because he really is only, this is his fourth point. He really has five, so he can't count. But you'd expect that from Klaus. I don't know where Klaus made his money, if he inherited it. He sounds like he inherited it, but he might have been an entrepreneur. He might have, who knows how he made his money. But Klaus is on number four, the role of the corporation. And no, that Klaus is not a socialist. He doesn't believe we should just take corporations and nationalize them. He doesn't believe that the state should owns the means of production unless necessary. I don't want to give too much credit to Klaus. Klaus is a fascist, economic fascist, in the sense that he believes that corporations should be controlled, controlled by the state. That's what fascism is when industry is controlled by the state. Back to Klaus. Back to Klaus. In this new post-COVID era, I think we are moving from short-term to long-term from shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism. Now, I think I've done a show on this, and I'll probably do more shows on this in the future, because this is a big topic. But stakeholder versus shareholder. Shareholder is supposed to be short-term. Tell that to the investors in Moderna who have been financing Moderna for a long time before it ever showed a profit. Tell that to the investors in Amazon who didn't see a profit for a long time. Didn't see the company make a profit for a long time. Tell that to biotech investors generally who get nothing for sometimes decades. For sometimes decades. Shareholder capitalism is capitalism and is long-term. Indeed, it's stakeholder capitalism that is undoable, and it's not long-term. It has to be short-term. There's no way to think about it long-term. So the whole way they construct this is so bogus, and they say things. Again, notice that when he says shareholder capitalism is short-term, everybody accepts it. Nobody challenges it. Nobody thinks about it. There is no, nobody on planet Earth is more long-term than American business driven by the stock market. Because, I mean, think about it. Where are all the investments made? Who does long-term R&D? Where does that happen? It's in this country, in the United States of America, which is not as capitalist as it used to be, but at least in certain sectors is quite capitalist, and at least in the way the private sector functions. Now, it could be longer-term. I would argue that the regulations, the controls, are what make it short-term. Thank you, Terry. Thank you, Tobias. Really appreciate it. So the idea that stakeholder is something long-term and stakeholder capitalism is so BS. There is no such thing. There's no something capitalism. There's only capitalism. Capitalism means freedom. And freedom means you get to invest in companies based on what they say they're going to do. And if a company wants to be a stakeholder that is not to maximize shareholder wealth, then it should register as such. It should declare itself as such in advance before I buy the shares. Because right now, according to the law in the United States, companies have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to maximize their long-term value. That's their legal responsibility. So if you're suddenly switching to stakeholder, you're violating your fiduciary responsibility.  There's no one basis by which you make a decision. Now, again, I think I've done a whole show on this. I'll do another one because this is becoming more and more and more prevalent.  It's basically destruction. It's anti-individualism. It's anti-self-interest. And it's definitely anti-capitalism. So it's not stakeholder capitalism. It's stakeholder fascism. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, wins or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist. All right. Before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now. 30 likes. That should be at least 100. I think at least 100 of you actually like the show.  But at least the people who are liking it, I want to see a thumbs up. There you go. Start liking it. I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this. And you know, the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego. It's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes. But if you like it, don't just sit there. Help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share and you can support the show at your own bookshow.com slash support on Patreon or subscribe star or locals and show you support for all for the work, for the value, hopefully you're receiving from this.  You'll know what shows are on, when they're on. You'll get notified, right? So yes, like, share, subscribe, support, like, share, subscribe, support, there you go. Easy. Do one or all of those, please.


Let's do it on the Friday I got boozy Susie and Matthew Hamilton and listen James cook it was a kind of kisbet because hammer came into town He said I want to do a hammer time on James cook and he's been really studying this Joe Brady offense since he took over as OC and then all of a sudden James cook was coming on our show and we said nothing is more perfect than this What are you noticing? Yeah, so when you look at the bills offense It was really stagnant under Doris and the bills are just 25th in the league when it came to using motion Pre-snap motion and since Joe Brady took over about a month ago They've ranked second and it's totally changed the complexion of this passing game. Let's dig into it. That's some cool place So here against the Eagles, it's a third and five you're gonna see this return motion from digs And what that does it tells Josh Allen what the coverage is before the ball snapped He knows it's man coverage because he saw Darius life following digs around there He's gonna run a quarter out and even with Josh the timing gets thrown off because these four staff to step up in The pocket, but he knows it's cover one single high safety in the middle field He knows he's gonna have all that space to the sideline and he could just put the ball out there and let digs run under it So defining coverages one use of motion. Okay more motion here from Dalton Schultz The other thing it does to a defense is it forces them to have to adjust on the fly the Eagles shifted their front But they don't really get the secondary on the same page You'll see here. There's four Eagles defenders over just two bills receivers and then on the bottom of the screen You got three Eagles defenders Three bills receivers and they're playing a cover to look Darius sleigh has flat responsibility He has to sit on that from Latavius Murray He can't get a ton of depth and then the safety is on an island He's got to defend two guys going vertical in Schultz and Gabe Davis That's right and Josh Allen throws the whole shot to Gabe Davis big play there And then there's motion that can create absolute chaos Here's Trent Schurfield coming in motion in this jet motion. It essentially creates a quads formation with him coming across Everybody else is going vertical and watch what happens to the safety. He has to keep eyes on that motion He steps down too far and cook is gonna run this rail route right up the seam and do that flip that he talked about into the end zone So again the use of motion from Joe Brady has been such a huge difference and you talked about it the other day, too It's created more of a ball distribution and I think it's really helped this offense everyone's getting involved like you saw There's three different receivers Everyone's getting involved in this offense James Cook seems very happy with this Joe Brady character. Everybody seems happy They do add a big one against Dallas. How do you think that one goes? Yeah? I think I think we see a really high score in game. I think these offenses are gonna come to play I think it's gonna be a lot of fun Well, they were talking about the numbers and the offense of what he's done You can motion schmoshion of the ocean while you want but I look at the numbers of the second ranked offense in the NFL Since Brady came and took over they're averaging over well over 400 yards


All right Mopar fam So we bought zero the 2014 Dodge Challenger RT, but we have a problem We got a mystery going on. So let's see if we can solve it together So every time I open the trunk I keep finding these things Cigarette butts, but they're completely not smoked and there's no tobacco in them They're completely empty and every day I'll clean some out and the next day. I'll open the trunk and there'll be more laying in the trunk Like they just keep up here literally like someone just keeps throwing them in there so I Think I found a problem, but what in the hell and What the actual shit is going on here? Check this out.  Why are they up there guys? What didn't that hell's going on? I don't know. I got to pull this thing down and find out what's going on.    That was that was crazy.  I don't know.  I was like Oh dang someone done loud.  Anyway, we'll see on the next one guys


The Holy See wanted to highlight the fact that the new technologies are an extraordinary blessing for humanity. They have the potential to enable us as a human race to work together to express our solidarity and concern for one another and as such we rightly believe they should be celebrated. At the same time I think we just wanted to say one thing is that we need to realise that the technologies themselves are not going to solve all the problems of the world. There's a need for real human commitment for individuals and institutions to take responsibility to ensure that we realise this potential and that means that we try and make sure that all our discussions and all our conversations are truly inclusive so the Holy See would be very concerned about the digital divide, that it would be a tragedy if mechanisms and technologies that really are now to roll together were to end up excluding those who are already excluded by poverty so we would be wholeheartedly trying to support those who are trying to ensure an absolute inclusivity. The other issues I think we would want to raise is that they recognise there's a role for government and for other organisations in regulation in this area we constantly want to say it's up to individuals too because a lot of the culture of the internet is established by the individual end-users and that they make responsible choices about the type of materials they want to share, produce, encourage others to look at so that there is a role of course for governments but there's also a need to help human individuals to become responsible agents in terms of their own engagement and the final point we wanted to make was simply was that while the technologies enable the platforms to come into being that will enable us to talk together, to discuss together, to face problems together maybe we need to recover the human aspect of communications which is particularly tied into the art of dialogue that is only by listening to others, by willing to learn from them that we can really make progress as human beings so that was essentially what we were here to say and we learned a lot at listening to others so that was even more important. One thing that I found I took a lot of encouragement was to listen to delegates from different parts of the world kind of affirming something that I thought myself is that the development of particular mobile technologies allowing countries that were traditionally poor in infrastructure to jump right into the digital world that's reassuring to hear that's not just my own prejudice but that it was confirmed by people from the countries themselves there was one particular thing yesterday that got me thinking and certainly something I'll be bringing back and I'll work with some other departments on is the whole thing about accessibility for people with disabilities because if in a sense it's not about being condescending or wanting to be nice but if we want to hear their voices and to have the full value of the contributions of people who often have a very very wise understanding of what our world is about I think we need to make sure that we make every effort we can to enable them to be fully present so that we will benefit from their perspectives and learn from them.


Welcome to the podcast. This is, as you all know, Explore Lucid Dreaming. Can you tell everybody your name? Um, my name is Explore Lucid Dreaming. I haven't done like a name reveal yet, so people just don't follow me on YouTube now, yeah. Oh, I didn't realize. I thought in the base reveal you did the, that's fine. The anonymous Explore Lucid Dreaming or Mr. Beluga. Mr. Beluga. As you all know, he's obviously the creator of Explore Lucid Dreaming for a big channel, the biggest channel about Lucid Dreaming. A million subscribers, probably more now. So congrats. Thank you. So did you think you would reach a million that fast? Like what was your kind of plan? On Explore Lucid Dreaming? Yeah. I mean, I didn't really know like that it could be done, but I think once the first video went viral, like when I started the channel, then I kind of realized that there was the potential for like a bigger audience out there. So it was really neat. Like when I first got a hundred thousand, I didn't even think that was possible. It was just something I did for fun. Yeah. Yeah, that's crazy. No, because I remember when, I think I remember when you published like your first couple of videos and I saw it being talked about on, I think it was Reddit and I think at that point you had about three, four thousand subs. Yeah. And then I checked back like a few weeks later and it was just, I mean, I can't remember how many exactly, but it was, it was a lot more and then it just kept on like snowballing basically. Yeah, it was weird. I think, I think the hardest milestone was like 10,000 and then after that, that's kind of when I got the first lucky or like viral video and then it went up 200,000 in like a couple, couple days I think or a week. That's amazing. Yeah. I'm curious like what your plan is for Beluga.  No, that's not really my plan. I would say I just like making videos on there that like people enjoy and because it's just so much fun to like get the feedback and like make like sometimes when I have an idea that I'm super confident about and then just like releasing it and seeing all the people I know like messaging me and say like, that was really funny or something like that. I think I'm just going to keep doing it as long as I can make entertaining content that I believe in and the channel kind of grows, I guess like in proportion to how good your videos are and like, so I don't really have any like subscriber goals. It's mainly just the content itself. Like I always want to innovate my content and like try to find the next thing with that and just keep doing it as long as I have fun. That's pretty much the goal for Beluga. Yeah, that's I mean, that's a pretty good goal to be honest, just have fun with it, be creative and obviously people like it. So it's kind of a win-win. Yeah, I think like creativity is probably like my favorite part about YouTube and just being able to make whatever video that you can think of. Yeah, for sure. And there's so many different like different directions you could go with it and styles. Like how did you get into actually video editing or like video making? Well, I've always been interested, I would say like in YouTube itself. My first channel I started when I was in grade six and I think like right away when I would start shooting videos like I did gaming back in the day on like a super small channel. Really? But I think you just kind of learned it as you go because you shoot something and then you're like, okay, what do I do with it? Or there's like this section that you have to cut out. How do I do that? Back then I only had my like my phone. So I had to download apps and like splice things out of there, iMovie and stuff like that. Eventually when I got a computer, I got Premiere and that's really when I started Explore Lucid Dreaming because I did kind of teach myself how to use Premiere and just like the things you could do on it and then figured out like learn the things that I needed to do for that channel which basically was put a bunch of clips, have like transitions, text, music, you know, stick my voice up with it. Can't imagine editing on a phone. It was brutal. I don't think anybody should have to do that. Editing gaming footage, like would you, how would you even do that? Would you transfer it from your console to your phone and then? I used to be like a console YouTuber but the reason I never really did well is because I would film the like the TV screen with my phone camera. It was really bad quality but. Yeah, isn't that like weird flickering when you do that? Yeah and it was like an iPod too so because I didn't have a phone till I was older but yeah it was like flickering it was bad and then I would like try to edit like cut it together and try to like save the clip with editing so maybe I learned I learned a bit from that like cutting out boring parts but yeah yeah. Oh wow that's interesting. Do you think you'll ever make another gaming channel or like go back to gaming channel? I think if there's a specific game that's like really good for YouTube and there's like an idea that that can be executed like I would never sit down and just play a game like for YouTube because that's already done like that's already been done like a million times and there's not really anything unique. I think if you're able to make like skits or like stories through video games then I would do that but I wouldn't I wouldn't know if I would be like a gaming YouTuber then or if I would just be like a like a story person I don't know but I I do like creating like stories and and carrying them out on right now it's discord but yeah yeah. Yeah it's pretty like the characters you make for the on the bloke channel is pretty funny actually so that's very creative. It was like a complete 180 for my lucid dreaming channel which yeah I just realized like how much creativity I had with it like because it was a completely different channel I could do anything I wanted and I'm just like it was so much fun to plan that out and to like create characters and stuff for it. How long does it take you to come up with an idea for the beluga channel like one of the discord stories where you have different characters and sound effects? I think like the idea for the title and thumbnail of the video usually takes like one or two hours and then once I have like the idea then I just write the script for it which it can take a long time depending on the idea because some ideas are like harder to get a script for and that other ones are more straightforward like like a story related to like when your phone's at one percent but you kind of know where it's going to lead and you just kind of like fill in the gaps so it really depends usually a few hours. That's a pretty good time.  I mean kind of depends on the on the top if I'm just responding to a question or you know a comment or something um then not very long because it's just based on my knowledge experience memory but if it's more of a complicated or if I'm like presenting information like about a supplement for example or research or yeah then it can take longer maybe a few hours depends. Do you write like an exact script like word for word? No no no I have yeah exactly I have like like keywords those statements and sentences and then there'll be next to the camera so I'll just like look at the keyword to remind me and then just kind of improvise on that yeah because otherwise no no maybe it sounds too scripted if I if I were to write out an actual script compared to if I just add a keyword and then just kind of spoke naturally about it. Yeah and like also people don't naturally talk like they would write so people would definitely know if you're reading off something. Yeah yeah exactly.  Um I have I know like people repost my stuff on TikTok but they usually have to like cut it up in small segments but I feel like I always want to just focus if I'm making videos to make them on YouTube because then you have more creativity and you can kind of do more with longer videos because on TikTok like how much impact can you have on someone if you only have a few seconds before they swipe up um see there's like only so many ideas you can do and usually they're pretty like shallow surface level ideas like just try to get a quick laugh before they swipe up whereas on YouTube like if you have a really good idea you make into a video it can be like an hour long and you could still have success with it which like I would rather make long videos or medium length videos than like 10 20 second short videos yeah but there is a lot of people on TikTok and yeah it's it's a huge sight. Yeah I noticed I think I actually saw a couple of people like reposting your exploits of dreaming stuff on TikTok and oh yeah I just yeah I just think maybe that some of the blue guard ideas could be translated to like a really short form and they probably do really well because I see a lot of short like YouTube shorts reels and stuff where it's very similar style you know like the quick editing entertaining storyline but condensed into a so it's engaging you know yeah but yeah I guess YouTube is more impactful because it's a bit longer and also I feel like when you build an audience on YouTube they'll stay with you longer than on TikTok and just like you can really get to know someone on YouTube more than a platform like TikTok like I don't really know I only know like a few people on TikTok but they're also on YouTube and when I think of them it's like I think of their YouTube channel mainly and I think like yeah I'd rather build things on YouTube than kind of try to get like fast growth or you know like tens of millions of views on TikTok and I think also the way they count a view is a bit different from from what I understand YouTube counts a view as anything above 30 or 20 or 30 seconds but with TikTok it's like it's almost automatic that it counts the view so even if you're scrolling past it instantly it's still technically a view which is I see worthless I mean it doesn't they might not have even watched the video they might just be like scrolling while they're looking at something else yeah you know


And what up guys? We're back here with another pattern tutorial. Today we're going to be learning a really quick pattern, right? So let's get to it. So this pattern guys, right? It's in four four, right? So there's going to be four beats in the measure. And what we're going to do is see this three times here. We're going to repeat the brackets. That's going to be the first three measures, right? And then this PF snare here is going to be the last beat in the measure, right? So let's break it down, right? So we've got the B, we got the kick drum. We got the Hu, which is the inward breath. We've got that Ha, which is an outward breath. We've got T, hi-hat. And we've got the PF for the PF snare, right? That's the B, Hu-Ha, T, Hu-Ha, right? So I'm going to do the pattern twice with you guys. And then I'm going to give you guys two measures to run through it yourself. And then we're going to increase the speed to 60 and then to 80 so that you guys can understand how to work with it and to practice it and drill it, right? You guys do it now on this next run through, okay? Three and four and awesome, great job, guys. So as you see, it's pretty fast, right? So we're going to go up to 60 now and great job. If that was hard, go back and re-watch it at 60 BPM, right? And then once you get it, once you're able to do it fluently there, then move up as we're about to do to 80 BPM, okay? Five, six, seven. So as you can see, this beat is has a lot of breath control within it, right? Using a lot of your diaphragm, you're pulling the box from your diaphragm, right? Those inward-outward breasts... Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha This beat is really great for becoming aware of your diaphragm as you're utilizing it so much when they're viewing the inward and outward breath and just switching back in between them, right?  Feel free to, you know, change some things within this beat, guys. You know what I mean? Make the bass kick into like, I don't know, an Indian word snare or something. You know what I mean? Just feel free to mess around with it, guys. You know, if you have any questions, message me on Instagram. And I'll see you guys in the next episode. Eerrp!


你想吃什麼 你想像從來東北餐就告訴我東北你們叫我們老天因為他們的關係很堅固歡迎來到另一部影片我們會在世界上學習食材我們會教你如何在這些時候旅遊今天我們來學習食材從中國的東北 叫做東北就是東北的西方當然我們正在學習東北我們不可以做到一個很正式的東北還有一位學校的同學Tony Bye有6分鐘的時間在這開箱很長的時間 而且很棒Tony Bye大家好 我是Tony我是沈陽遼寧很多人都知道東北餐廳的食材所以今天我們來教你們我們有三種不同的東北餐廳我們今天會教你們我們有餐廳的食材我們有街道的寶貝式然後我們有東北餐廳我很興奮所以首先我們去吃同學們我們在我們U Scooters GT 2020如果你們想要60塊錢在你的購物請在U Scooters.com上搜尋走吧這個地方是一家新的家庭餐廳叫做 private kitchen中國的名字叫做小東北叫做 Little Northeast這個地方是東北餐廳所以我非常興奮就像我吃的餐廳櫃子感覺很像像一個外國的寶貝式他們有兼額兼額兼額現在你可以兼額兼額兼額兼額用你的餐廳然後用它等等我只看到在中國在這裡只有在中國還有寶貝我們要做什麼如果我們想要最正確的東北餐廳像骨頭東北的雞肚對 雞肚我們要做這個這個是東北的油豆餃你知道嗎這個很便宜還有我的媽媽我們要做這個對這個是鍋包肉我們要做鍋包肉這個金叫肉絲金叫肉絲金叫肉絲對你們可以選擇這個第三鮮這個蠻不錯的我們最喜歡他的東北餐廳都可以加上菜了他說他喜歡的說話像個老闆他知道是好吃的因為他做的當然是好吃的東北其實不是一個大陸只是一個地方有三個大陸Toni 東北的三個大陸所以他們是黑龍江吉林和遼寧他們是兄弟Toni 為什麼你只喝了一瓶啤酒怎麼會這樣他們知道要給你一瓶啤酒我知道你叫我們喝一口我不會生氣我只是有點害怕我還沒帶你上去那是我們遇到的是真的我們開始了在東北的油豆餃中這裡是 private kitchenToni 什麼我們在看我們有鍋包肉這個很有趣這是一個山洋風味正式甜甜的味道很香很甜我吃了很像抹茶不像普通的牛奶像牛奶是比較像牛奶所以有點酥脆我們吃了很多但是我還要進去再吃一塊好厲害有些人說這是我們今天美國的甜甜餐餐館你知道有些東西是東北的你們會看到更多我們進去的像我看過的很多人跟東北跟美國的Rus Belt所以我特別來的新陽我知道是很大型的因為差不多所有的車子都在那裡人們在那裡是很綠色的所以他們喜歡吃喝和吃在一起然後吃到像這個好 大家來試試很難說因為像是一塊冷糕和雞糕和牛奶好像是一個飲料但人們在東北會吃這個像是一個主菜我愛這個食物就是糕狀感覺像啫喱但它很容易脫下來其實不是那麼酥脆但它有那種味道所以東北的 next staple dish是這個叫第三鮮意思是 triple the lightbut 第 means ground所以椰子都 grown there是pepperspotatoesand eggplant我不知道為什麼但每次我看這個菜是在聽第三鮮3 delight plate是有趣的因為它是剩下的蔬菜但如果你們看著有這麼多的油在底下好絕對沒有蒸那當然其實沒有那麼多蒸的食物在東北的 culture我們喝了很多所以你們想要很重的味道當你喝你不想吃蒸的 白酒你不想吃蒸的 白酒所以這個是排骨燉雞豆就是像是鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪跟鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪這就是我每次吃的最 authentic version of this dish這是鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪鋪椰子通常是配合的肉和重味我的天但他們在那邊那是好大家不要緊我們要吃一會兒因為鮑斯蒂瓜馬來西亞的雞蛋已經有了所以馬來西亞現在還很暖意思是它會暖但這樣你能拿著拿著一塊乾的雞蛋你必須沾在冷水裡這就是為什麼這道菜要吃到現在馬來西亞的甜雞蛋鮑斯蒂瓜好通常是吃到的 dessert所以我們要吃到不然會和其他東西一起吃我們知道我們有很多東西吃不過這就是我最想吃的這是第一天的天氣在紐約接下來我們有五香醬大骨是像酸酸的炸醬的肉肉很軟很香我們大眾像我們我們要吃肉所以這看起來很棒酸酸的肉醬大骨嗯是吧是吧那 mean is just falling offcould they make Dongbei foodmore presentable to like the Manhattan marketdo you think it's possibleI think it's possiblebut it's definitely needs a little marketing you knowlike for exampleour Trumbing is literally justalmost the same thing as a soft shell tacoif you market it as Trumbingpeople might not know what that isbut if you market it as a Chinese soft shell tacothat's definitely an easier way to try the food rightactually these are so goodback in the day I could probably eat 30 of these by myselfso I'm gonna grab plenty of scallionsand pork right hereyou can even put literally anything herebut get some shrimp beansoh let me put a pepper from the Dishan Shanoh maybe a potato will be goodyeah alright we mix it everythingyo yo check what I'm doingI took the pepper from the Dishan Shanok Trumbingbro this is actually the perfect thing to havetowards the end of the mealwhere you can kinda pick and chooseany of the leftovers that are still hereand then you put them togetheressentially small burrito wrapexactlywowif you like Americanized Chinese foodor even like semi Americanized foodlike Mushu porkyou will like don't make foodit totally is fitting withinthings that you likesalty,sweet,tastyalright last but not leastthis is something I've never had beforeyou kinda had this growing up rightyeah so the vegetable that's usedwhich is the kaseya root jellyis pretty native to the northhanspicy cold noodlesit's like a cold spiceyou don't eat a lot of dishes like thisthere's only a few disheslike even from Sichuanthat is like a cold spicy dishit's kinda like two familiar flavorsbut I never had thosejust opposed to each otherthese little konjac jelly knotsare one of my favorite thingsto eat during hot potwhat was your guys' favoritething that you guysgot to double down onI'm not gonna liethis was one of my favoritedonbe meals I've ever hadI got a rollwith the jingjiang roe sethe pancake that came with itand the ability to wrapeverything I never eventhought of it that wayso manwhat are you pickingcome on gummerthe wu tai la piI'm actually going withthe wu tai la pialright Tonyyou're the residentshen yang guy herewhat are you pickingfrom this mealhonestlyI'm gonna have to gowith the di san xianbecause that's somethingthat's a staplein donbe foodwhen I had thisit just brought backreally good nostalgiaand they cookedthis very well hereprivate kitchen washitting todayI'm gonna clapit's a private kitchen manI'm gonna give ithonestly straight upa 4.5 out of 5why not man4.5 out of 5it's almost damn nearperfect mannow we're gonna hit uplike a more local spotmore of a drinking atmosphereand eating more oflike tapasand charsalright onto the drinking spot你好 你是哪裡人吉林省Yanban 朝鮮族朝鮮族母語是韓國話韓國話 對你覺得這裡的菜就是很標準嗎對啊 法拉盛第一東北 world 餐館跟吉林差不多welcome everyone to cometo the private kitchenthe Chinese name is小東北welcome everyonethank youthank you so muchguys it's snowing outwe just ate 東北 foodwe got a 東北 friend with ushow much more 東北 could it getwe have just travelledone mile downcassetta boulevardwe're here at holly aband we are outside of liu buit's a char spotaka xiao cao spotaka barbecue spotso basically xiao caois really popular all around Chinabut for some reasonthe 東北 xiao cao spotsare the most popularmaybe it's because of vibemaybe it's because they're wildmaybe it's because they're crazymaybe it's because they're a little bitlit or ratchetI don't know let's find outlet's head into liu bufirst off very minimally decoratedclassic chinesehold the wall feelingsuper authenticthey even have theselittle tables with thetrapsies on the sideit's got a really nicehome feelingwe've just found outthat the owner hereis from shanyangand so is sonythe owner is actually from my cityso I'm excited to seehow the food is here我們聽說你們的餐廳開了六年對對對你想吃什麼你想像什麼在東北餐又告訴我們我們要來一頓我們要來一頓那是最不好吃的那是最不好吃的那是最不好吃的SonyI only want to order the thingsthat you would be eatingin shanyangon the streetokwhat kind of chuaare we looking at?hot pepperchuawe definitely got the lambyou got to get the squidgot to get chicken gizzardsyou guys eat intestinesI willI willI don't love itbut I willall right you guyswe have arrivedat our barbecue placecalled liu buwhat does that mean?they want the customersto remain hereafter they comeand just come back againso it's kind of likea good luck nameand then what did she saywhen she found outyou were from shanyangpeople from thefrom Dongbeiare very lostthey really careabout the relationshipand that you guysare from the same regionand said thatanything you could think ofwill just cook it for youthat doesn't havewhen the relationshipis so solidit's as hard as irondude guysyou guyswe got to start getting intosome of thisshou khaowhich is a barbecuehis tofu skin is so thinit's almost like apastatough peoplebut soft tofuit's firewowit's like pepperypasta in my mouthbroit tastes like meatthe flavor and the cuminall rightwell let's talk aboutthis real quickthese are rice cakesand they lookit's basicallythe same thingbut this oneis grilled overso it's a littlecrispy on the outsidewith the cuminlittle salt pepperso it's gotthat kick to itlet's gocumin rice cakemmmusually it would belike in a dessertor somethingthis is a grilledmontoa monto is the white breadthey just slice it uplike a texas toastmmmwowthe seasoning is on pointwith the flavoringand the barbecuethis is really good guysit's really crispyon the outsideand super fluffy on the insideso the weight just came byand I'm not going to lieyou know my Chinese is not that goodbut she said something likeyo the auntie made thisespecially for you guysyeah yeahshe gave us these twosimple vegetable dishesbrothey might yeah very homestylethey might not looklike anything fancybut I guarantee youthe flavor will be thereI'm really excitedabout this onethis lettuceI love lettuce,garlicand gingerlet's gothey do try to make the vegetableskind of have a meaty umami flavorbrothis is super tastyI'm not sayingit doesn't have its oilbut this is really goodit's kind of spicysuper savorythat's kind of a kickyou can eat the flavoringwith a lotyou put some rice in thereand you just caneat a lot of peopleyo Tonyyou said you never hadduck tongues before rightnopego for it brommmthe duck tongue is kind of fireduck tongue was actually really goodI think definitelycertain cuts of meatis more debatablebut ones that'snot up for debateis the young rochonyou can't really go wrongwith the lamb skewermmmperfectit's goodand I know usually a lotof people don't reallyeat lambbut with the cuminand the barbequeit can't even tastethat weird tastethat some peoplecan't complain about rightthis lamb with cuminis like a perfect combinationalright the skewersare flying in guysI have the chicken rackso it's a bunchof like chicken rib bonesand then thisI believeare the sheep testicleswhich I orderedon purposebecause I saw thisin YouTube videosabout the Dongbei region這個是how do I saysheepoh lamb kidneyguys this was the kidneyI'm gonna go intake a lookoh we gotta do itguys we gotta do it togethersheepI know you haven't had thisbut this is really popularin Dongbei I guessI guess solet's go guysgambaeoh my goshit's not badit's tenderI would not sayit's fireit's not bad thoughI'm gonna eat thischicken rackjigu jaoit's my favorite Dongbei dishesall right you guysthis is egg and chiveoh manI was waiting to get thisI'm currentlychewing on a chicken neckyeah yeahI know I said thatand it's bombhere we havethe tofu skinsstir fry withpepper and porkand I know that thiskind of looks likeleathery tofubut actually look atthat pork and howit's charredwhat's your favoritethe traditionaloh manyou can never go wrong with thatguysthe duck tongueand the beef tendonwere sweetnoI gotta give a shout outand if nobody's gonna shout it outto the actually garlicyeahthis garlic was done betterthan a lot of spotsI've actually had this grilled garlicTony we were kinda talking earlieraside from foodyou were saying thatit's possible thatsort of thearchetypical Dongbei personalityhelped you adapt towestern societyit definitely helped meI just went in with the fact that ifit came from methen that's justwhat it is you knowand that's kind ofthe Dongbei mindsetwe don't cater ourselvesto somebody else you knowwe'll play like a clipof this Dongbei songthis Dongbei songbasically saying likeevery Dongbei personis like a selflesssoldier that helpsthe community rightyou know everybodyis a selfless soldierthank godyou got aDongbei friendin your circlesome of the spotsare ran byDongbei peopleif not servingDongbei foodsome really goodnortheastern dumplingsand the specialty Tonythat we're going to get todayis fish dumplingsfish dumplingsI've actually neverhad that myselfso I'm excitedyou might talk to the peopleand find out that it'sactually a very commonDongbei dish that maybeyou just didn't havebut you know whatwe'll find out guysnew world mallwe have arrived at theDongbei fish dumplingTony you said even youare not familiar with this rightdoesn't mean the fillingis made of fish oryou're about to find out英文是Dongbei人吗上阵what are we going to beusually in the northwe personallywe eat thechive dumplingsand we also eatthe sen sian dumplingswhich is made ofpork shrimpand scallion你现在做的谁叫是鱼的吗we're going to hit upthis other dumpling spotit's the ChineseKorean dumpling placemy guess is thatthey're most likelyfrom Dongbeiso let's go find out你是东北人吗我是大连的大连的I'm from Shuiyangthe owner is actuallyfrom Shuiyang as wellis there another dumplingwhat about this sour cabbagelet's get thatsour cabbage as we knowis a huge thingin Dongbeiit kind of just liketipifiedwhat people eat out thereright herewe got Koreanand Chinese foodthey have some different dishesthan the KoreanChinese dumplings over thereSo we are anew world malland like we saidin the world NYCwe explore culturethrough foodbasically long story shorta lot of peoplein Dongbeioriginally are from Shandongfrom Dalian to Yantaithere is someshared culturebecause they're rightacross the water from each otherI think it's justthe boat ridethis kind of representsthe transition pointbetween Shandonginto Dongbeistarting offmore with theshandongDalian dumplingsthese are theSanshinso it's gotthree things in itpork shrimpand cabbageand thenpork shrimp and chivesso everybodygo in for one of themI need some of thatvinegar brosoy sauce guyI'm a hybridI'm a hybrid actuallyyo theSanshin is asuper good dumpling manthis has a lot of shrimpand parsley in it tooso it's very fragrantSanshin is usuallypretty typical of the northbecause usuallyyou wouldn't putsea food in your dumplingsrightbut since we're closeto the waterit makes senseI'm moving on guysthis is a chive and egg oneI think this one needsa little bit of vinegarbut also some soy saucelet's goegg chivesit's really traditionalthis is like adumpling formmoving onwe've got lamband carrotonce you're startingto get intothe northern meats herethe lambsyou know this is my firsttime having lambchopped upand mixed with carrotit's pretty juicyactually the lambbecause lamb is a very fattymeatit created almost likea shaolong baosoup like effectwithin the dumplingcarrot kind of takes awaythe gaminess of the lambI've never had carrotin a dumpling beforelast but not least guysthis is somethingI'm super excited aboutfish dumplingmore native toChingdaoYantai and DalianI'm about to eat thiswith no sauce guysfish dumplingthis is your first timeyou get the first dumplingfirst time first timefluffy fish in the middlevery niceit could be codsea bassit's pounded upbut not too muchlike a fish ballthat's very goodmuch softer than a fishballcoming into competewith the shandongstyle dumplingswe actually havea very verydongbei styleof eating dumplings hereit's a little bit thickereven more wheat and lookwant to say Korean chili pepper flakesin therelooks like the thing you dipthe seafood pancakein the hamon rightsour cabbage dumplingsway more sourbetween the sauceand the fillingit just hits youvery crunchy as wellI like itit's not too too souris this the dumpling of them allthat's just hitting youin your soul right nowit definitely isit's done in the senseyeah for suresour cabbage is so popularin shayanglike where I used to liveevery singleapartment windowis just filledthe drawers of cabbagecan't even see insidewhy would the apartmentwindows be filledwith cabbagescause I think that the cabbageis exposure to the sunso it's best to put itnear the windowalso maybe it's justthere's no roomin the houseyou knowthat's a good pointI don't want to goagainst the yantai dumplingsbut I don't knowthat one was kickingwith the most flavor easilyI can't saythe lambI like the fish dumplingI like the fish dumplingbut they were actuallyall very goodthey're all winners guysall brothersall brothersall brothersall brothersall laotiaslast two thingswe have our morelike Korean style dishesTony is this somethingyou ate growing upin shayangdo you ever eat thisI don't personallybecause I don't reallylike a cold noodlebut my parentsactually meteating thisso it's super traditionaland it definitely hitshome when I see this dishstill your parentsmet over eatinglo mianyeahin shayanggimme oneyou got three of themwould you order againI can't even tellone is chickengizzardone is lamband the other oneis squid headall rightyeah definitely more saucythan usualit has a high kickat the end tooI believe this is moreof how the KoreanChinese would do theirchouarit's actually a lot moreredit might even havea slight gochujangflavor on ityambian is right acrossthe borderfrom North Koreatry these noodlesyou'll tell me whatyou should try itwhich your parents metshould I try itmaybe if you starteating this someDongbae girlsgonna come aroundthey're like heynot badvery refreshingplenses my palatefor some more dumplingsalright you guysthat does itfor the dongbaeepisode of the worldand whywhen we went tothat littlebarbecue spotit really warmed meto see thatthe dongbaerations that do remainstill have the characteristicsof dongbaeit was veryjust homiethey were so warmand joking aroundwith each otherI almostthought I was a dongbaeperson for a secondI really didn't expectto meet people whoreally do showthe blendingand the diversityof cultures up thereespecially in that partin the far placesthat you knowwhere the countriesborder each otherthere is a significantamount of blendingup therewhich makes it uniquethe different groupsof people learningto get alongwith each otherbut still being proudof being from dongbaemight alsoit's weird to think thata stereotypeof a region in Chinais being extrovertedright?if you guys get the chanceto try dongbae foodeven if you're not asianyou should just check it outvery very underrated foodin the comments down belowlet us knowwhat your favoritenortheastern Chinesedongbae dish isalsolet us knowif there's another cuisinethat we should coverout in New York Cityon the worldnyyes we are making itout the fleshingwho knowsif it's a really goodrestaurantwe might evenget itso let us knowin the comments down belowguys big shout outto Tony Baithank you so muchfor watchingand until next timewe outPeaceI'm always blown awayby how much fleshingactually feelslike ChinaI posted a storyjust nowand probably 20 peopleasked me if I was in Chinathey're like heyyouare you making it oncourtier for break?