Fydoedd ydych yn efallai chyfwosio mewn amddannu ond y parodi syniant. Mae'n ei gweithio ar y cyfrindd, ei rhoi ei werthio ar y cyhoedd. Fyn neb y byd gan y cyfrindd yn ei gweithio, a ni hefyd yn ei gweithio yn y bydd. Mae'r cyfrinddd yn trafodaeth. Rydym chi'n gweithio y nid yw, ac mae'n rhaid i chi'n gweld i chi'n gweld i chi. Rhaid i chi'n gweld i chi'n gweld i chi. Rwy'n ei wneud o'r pari-dweithio, rwy'n ei gweithio. Yn dweud. Ysgol i'r hyn o'r ffordd yma yw eich cyfnod ar y dyfodol 1845 o'r cyfnod yma. Rwy'n ei gweithio. Ond yna'r gwneud o'r ffordd o'r ffordd o'r ffordd o'r ffordd. Ond mae hi'n gwneud o'r ffordd o'r ffordd o'r ysgol, ac ydych chi'n gallu gweithio yn sicr o'r ddechrau. Felly, yn y wneud, yn y ffordd yma, mae'r gweithio yn yma yn ei ddechrau yn eu cyflym o'r gael, mae'n gweithio'n gweithio ar gyfer amlwn. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio ar gyfer, Adrian Bowman, rydym yn Ysbytyd Glasgow, a Adrian a yo angen i gyd yn yma yn gweithio'n gweithio yma, a yna'n gweithio'n gweithio'r gweithio'n cyffredigon, ac yn y gallu'n gweithio, rydyn ni'n ddim yn ddod i. Rydyn ni'n ddod i, ac rydyn ni'n ddod i'n ddod i. Rydyn ni'n ddod i. Dw i'r ddweud, mae Mary maen nhw'n ddod i, rydyn ni'n ddod i'n mynd i, rydyn ni'n ddod i, yng nghymoedd arllun o'r museum maritime dystau.  A'n gweithio, mae'n ddefnyddio'n gweithredu. A'n ffordd, os ydych chi'n fawr, yng Nghymru yw'r llei'n gwneud yma? Mae'n dweud yn fawr, i'r llwyntr ym Yngrifoedd Scott yn y Ndiddorol, ac yn gweithio'r cram, Mae'n rhan o'r rhanio'r hyfforddiadau ymlaen, mae lle mae'n rhanio'r rhanio, bod yna llunodd yn credu o'r mhant, 129 cyfnodd o'r rhanio'r llunodd yn oedd yn ei falch o'r cyfrwys yrdydd yn yr artych. Mae'n eru haf ddim yn, oherwydd o'r flwyddyn ar y ddiddordeb, yn rhanio'r flwyddyn o'r rhanio'r rhanio. Mae'n rhanio'r hyfforddiadau yn y rhanio'r hyfforddiadau, ar y dyfodol maes gweld yma ar y cadw'r cyffredin. Cynnwys John Franklin yn ymdegol ein bod ar y last maes. Rwy'n gwybod eu ffyrdd ymgyrch. Felly mae'r cyfweld yn cyngorol. Ond yw'n gwybod, mae'n gwybod eich hyffordd o'r cyllidol oherwydd y cantyswfau o'r dyfodol oherwydd mae'n gweld ymgyrchu o myfydlu a'r dnyddol. Mae'n gwybod i'n cael ei hynny'n gweld. Mae'n gweithio i'r cyffredin ac mae'r llwyfr amdano. Nghymru am ychydig. Rwy'r llai ni'n dewis a'r hwnnw yma ymlaen. Mae'r llehau oedd y llehau ar y pethau ..o'r llehau yma mae'n gwahanol. A ride gallwch ar ymwesol yma. Rwy'r pethau. Yn ystafell anodd i beth sydd yn gennym ar y stylo yng nghymhys y 19th. Felly mae'r cyfnod yw'r cyfnod yn llawd ac yn cyfnod yn cyfnod. Mae'r cyfrifio hynny yn gweithio y Brithwyddon i ddweud argynnu'r ardal yn y gwybod o'r cyflwyno. Rydyn ni'n gweld mai gydag yn cyfnod yn gyflwyno. Felly mae'r ffyrdd, mae'r ffyrdd yn y, rydyn ni'n gwybod i'n gwybod, rydyn ni'n gwybod i chi ardal. Y ffyrdd ymddangor o adnod ddwy i'r wyf, yw roedd y 19th yma i'r ffyrdd yma i'r wyf, felly we will find the North West Passage and we'll find it before the Americans, this is most important. Or the Russians, even worse in those days. So our interest lies up here in what's called the High Arctic and let's focus in on that because this is where all the action is this evening. Today, if you are in the market for a North West Passage, you're spoiled for choice. Any of these routes will get you through and unfortunately the laser punch is not working here. But one of them, you see the little route there by, you see Joe Haven and Tully Oak down the bottom left, the bottom right of the routes. That route remains open generally speaking through most summers and that's an important bit of information. Now that's the situation today. Back in 1845 it was a bit different. There had been a lot of advances by previous expeditions in finding a way in from the East, from the Atlantic and also from the West, from the Pacific. But whether there was a connection between the two was unclear. Now the sharp hide amongst you will also see there's a tiny white bit there that wasn't explored at that time and that might seem very trivial. In fact it's very significant because it's where that passage that I showed you a moment ago lies. And the trouble is that the Admiralty charts at that time suggested there wasn't a passage there at all. It was a bay. I will see that in a year later this would have serious implications for a particular expedition. Now with all this advance and the fact that it seemed most of the Arctic had been explored, the second secretary to the Admiralty of Mancall Sir John Barrow came up with this. This is the sort of statement that people who don't actually have to go and do work themselves or put themselves in danger will tend to come up with. So little and now remains to be done. We can find a link between these two bits where home and dry. Barrow was up against it though because there was already disenchantment about whether even if a Northwest passage existed could it be exploited commercially. It might only be open for a few weeks every year. But he was fortunate he pulled all the right patriotic leavers and he got the money. So then who was going to command this expedition? Well you'll have guessed. It has to be somebody called Franklin. And indeed it was Captain Sir John Franklin and pictured here the day before they set sail on the expedition. Now Franklin was a great hero, Arctic hero. As a young man he had, actually I should say as a very young man he served with Nelson at Trafalgar. As a young man he'd also carried out some of the very early Arctic exploration. And this is where he earned his title of the man who ate his boots because he and his companions having run out of their provisions were forced to literally their shoe leather to survive. So he was a tough man. But a very distant man by all accounts and treated all his crews very well. He was extremely popular. He didn't believe in corporal punishment of crew members. But his career had rather, this was in the 1920s and 30s. And his career had rather fallen into the Daldrens. And he was desperate before he retired. He was now 59 to redeem things. He was very keen to be made commander of this expedition. The Admiralty weren't so sure but they couldn't persuade any of the previous commanders to go on to the Arctic to go back. They'd been there recently and they thought we're not chanceing our arm again. Franklin was very happy to go so he was put in command. And he had two other officers to rely on. Francis Crozier, another very experienced Arctic man. He'd also been to the Antarctic so he really knew his business. And a younger man with no Arctic experience, James Fitzgames, but a rising light in the Navy. And between the three of them it was thought this expedition would have every success. Provided with these two ships, the Arabus and the Terror, very strongly built, strengthened for the ice and retrofitted with steam engines to force their way through the pack and very lavishly equipped for three years. Nothing, no expense was spared in the provisioning and equipping of the ships. They were centrally heated for a start which was real innovation at the time. So when it came time to depart, of course these sort of statements again which are huge hostages to fortune and great temptations to Providence tend to be made. And indeed as we'll see Providence was severely tempted. But no wonder because one of the astounding facts about the planning of this expedition was that there was no planning for rescue or relief if something went wrong. And all Arctic hands could not believe it. That this important, essential part of planning was really cast aside by the Admiralty. It was a ffeta compli. Franklin will get through. It was enormous complacency. Well, they headed off 19th May, 1845 from the Thames. According to the illustrated London News, 10,000 people turned up to bid them farewell. And at the end of July, same year, they were making their way across Baffin Bay where they encountered a British whaling ship. And Captain Martin of that ship was, he spoke to Franklin and his officers and when he got back to London reported they'd been in high spirits and good health and very confident. As it turned out, Martin would be the last man, last European to ever see them alive. So they headed off and at that stage in the proceedings they had 129 officers and men and a dog called Old Neptune. I mentioned Old Neptune, he was actually sketched before they left. I mentioned him because we'll see him again later in much less happy circumstances. No animals were deliberately harmed in the making of this presentation. So off they went and they disappeared into the white and silent times. I really should be ashamed of this, shouldn't I? And disappeared into the silence of the Arctic. 1845 spun into 1846 and no communication whatsoever. So naturally the press and the relatives of the crew were starting to get anxious but the Admiralty said no no, we can expect them to be away for maybe one or two winters before we hear anything more from them. But privately there was serious concern. And in early 1847 the so-called Arctic Council was convened of leading lights in previous Arctic expeditions. And they never met like this. This is again another bit of Victorian idealism. It's unlikely any of them could have been in the same room together without attempting to murder each other. Most of them loathed each other. But it was decided that a search and rescue mission should be launched. And that it would follow Franklin's prescribed sailing orders into the Arctic. And the man chosen to lead this was this gentleman here, Captain Sir James Ross. Ross was ascribed as the handsomest man in the Navy. That was what the press called him. Of course you don't know what competition he may have been up against. But anyway, he's a decent enough looking man. And Ross was very experienced. He'd been to the Arctic many times before and to the Antarctic with Crozier, the second in command to Franklin. So it was thought really that Ross will find them. This is sort of the problem. But as it turned out, Ross wouldn't find them. And what was even worse, Ross would make sure by making the most terrible mistake that nobody else would find them either. Here's what happened. Ross followed Franklin's sailing orders coming in from the Atlantic here to reach this point here where both his ships got stuck in the ice. Despite everybody's suggestions, he'd refused to have any steam power fitted these ships. So he just got stuck. But nothing daunted, he headed off south because he had a pretty good idea that's probably where Franklin would then have gone. And he reached a point where he had a view down this straight that you can see there. And the view was this, that there was a solid barrier of ice, which he concluded extended all the way down that straight. And it was part of a known barrier of varial dice throughout this whole area. So he concluded that Franklin could not possibly have forced his ships down that way. It didn't seem to occur to him that two years earlier the ice might not have been in that state. That was a judgment he made. The result of that was that all the subsequent searches were directed either to the west along this northerly straight here or to the north of that position. And the area that was never searched was this.  Now the early searches were actually quite positive because in 1850 they discovered Franklin's first winter quarters of 1845 on a tiny island called Beachy Island. And it was a very well located place for winter quarters. It's a photograph of it here. It's a very good bay where the ships were known to be moored, very sheltered from the ice. And when it was discovered there was all the signs of the well formed base with buildings and so on and three graves. And the graves are still there. The graves were not, and there's nothing sinister about the fact that men had died. They died on these expeditions. But what completely confounded the search ships and search crews was that Franklin when they'd left the base had left no indication of where they were going next. And this was completely against all orders, Admiralty orders. The expectation with any Royal Naval ship was that it would leave either in a copper canister which was chucked over board to be picked up eventually they hoped or buried on land under a prominent cairn, a note saying where they'd been, what their present position was and what their intention was. This island was literally dug over many times. It's a tiny island. It's only about a mile by a mile by numerous search crews. Nothing was ever found and this completely confounded things because the search ships had no idea where they should then go. The Admiralty was pulling out all the stops by this stage rather belatedly five years after they'd left. This is equivalent to about 1.6 million reward now. It was in primarily at the whaling industry because they were most likely to encounter Franklin ships. But all of this was completely to no avail. For the next four years, numerous squadrons of ships, both British and American, were sent into the Arctic according to Ross's instructions of where it was best to look and nothing at all was found. After this period of time, the expedition had been gone for nine years. They were provisioned for three. The Admiralty realised nobody could still be alive. And when they did their audit, it was pretty obvious that this could not, this farce could not go on. I won't bother reading, you can read the speculative value yourself. 200 men dead, that's in addition to the Franklin crew who were known to be dead. And all these ships lost. And the present day total estimated by the National Archives is that this little venture cost 48 million and that does not include the cost of replacing these ships. Which were brand new steam ships. So it was a staggering sum of money for nothing, absolutely nothing. And the Admiralty agreed that things would have to be brought to an end at that point. And so did the Times Newspaper which summed up the whole thing like this. A downright, tharagoing catastrophe, which it was. So the Admiralty decided the relatives would be, all the salaries of the crew would be paid up to 31st March 1854 and paid to the relatives. And that would be the end of it. If they thought it was the end of it, they were just about to be very sadly disabused of that notion. Because only a few months later, this man, John Ray, some of you may have heard of John Ray. He's an Orcadian. And he studied medicine at Edinburgh but never practised. He joined the Hudson Bay Company where he became one of their most eminent explorers and surveyors. And it was while Ray was surveying this area here, in the Arctic. He was aware of the Franklin expedition that was missing of course. He encountered a group of Inwood, these called Eskimos, but the Inwood people are the correct title today. Who astounded him by saying that they knew that white men had died in large numbers far to the west of where they were at that time. And that prior to their death, some of other members of their particular family had encountered them while still alive in 1850. Now that dates very important if you can hang on to it. So this was four years before Ray got this news, 1850. It was obvious from what they had told him that the sight of this disaster, if that's what it was, was here, what's now King William Island. And they had some of the personal possessions of the men who had died. Many of which were obviously possessions from some of the officers in the expedition. And most telling was this, the Guelfic order that had been awarded to Franklin and which he was wearing the day before he left on the expedition. There's no doubt now they were dead, they had met some, obviously grim fate. So Ray headed back at once to England with the news that the winter was setting and he couldn't go to King William Island himself to check on this. But he got back to England, went straight to the Admiralty with this report. And there was one element of the report of what they Inwood had told him, which he and the Admiralty agreed should not be disclosed because it was too shocking. So it was agreed this report would go to the Times newspaper for publication, but this would be omitted. Well, you can guess exactly what happened. Some buffoon in the Admiralty did not remove the offending part of Ray's report. So this is what appeared in the Times the next day. This is the offending bit. From the mutilated state of many of the corpses and the contents of the kettles, those are what the Navy called the cooking apparatus. It was evident that our wretched countrymen had been driven to the last dread alternative as a means of prolonging existence. In other words, cannibalism. Now this was met with shock and disbelief by the public. British officers did not eat each other. Maybe the men might, but you know we're not going to that. And honestly some people did say that in the report in letters to the Times. But basically this was something that was beyond the pale. We would not accept this. And for the Admiralty it was the final straw. It was a stain on the whole thing. And they were hugely pleased shall we say that the Crimean War of course had just begun. Which is proving a major distraction to the public because of the other in fact greater blunders going on there. So the nation's attention was distracted. And Franklin and this horrible event could be forgotten. But not everybody was distracted. And the one person who certainly was not was Jane Franklin, Franklin's widow. And if you ever get lost in the Arctic this is the person you want rooting for you I can tell you. Jane Franklin accepted that her husband John was dead and all the rest of them. But she felt it was important that the formal records, the logs and diaries from the expedition should be recovered. Because they would tell exactly what had gone on. And she couldn't believe her husband had resorted to cannibalism. So she was determined to do this. She petitioned the government, the Admiralty. She petitioned Palmerston the then Prime Minister directly. But they politely basically told her to forget about it. So nothing daunted she set up a public subscription. And she raised enough money to buy her own ship to go to the Arctic. This shamed the Admiralty into providing a captain for the ship and a crew and to provision it. And the little steam yacht Fox was found and bought by Jane Franklin up in Aberdeen of all places. It was a former luxury yacht which she bought and had it fitted out for the ice. You can see this photograph was obviously taken on washing day. There's a fine selection of long johns and semets hanging up there. And the man set to command this was Francis McClintock, a very experienced Arctic commander who could be trusted to do the best possible job. In fact he refused to take a salary for this. He thought it was a matter of principle to go and do this work. You can see too he lived a long life. He lived into the 20th century. McClintock knew exactly where to go. He headed for King William Island. And when he got there he had the Admiralty chart with him that Franklin also had. And he realised very quickly by the fact that he could circumnavigate what was thought to be King William land. That Franklin had been seriously misled. That he could have got through that easy passage. McClintock recorded that in the bestselling book that he later wrote about all this. But we'll come to that later. Cut a long story short after searching the island on the 27th of May 1859. McClintock found the only written document ever recovered from the Franklin expedition. And he found it in a copper canister buried in a cairn, a prominent cairn. And this is it here. The handwriting is James, it's James, the third in command. I've been privileged to see and handle this document. I must be getting a bit soft in my old age. It's actually quite an emotional experience I have to say. It's a very frail piece of paper. You can see that some of it is written in a very strong confident hand. And if you look up the right hand margin, you can see a scroll up the side. This was written on two occasions. The paper itself is a standard performer that all the ships had to record their position routinely, their ongoing activities and their expected proceedings. And the first bit of it, if I take you through this, we can turn this into the chronology of what, to the Victorians anyway, appeared to have happened. We can see that now. We know for sure they left Beachy Island in 1846 having spent the winter there. And it's evident they made very fast progress south to this point here. Now this of course is where they would consult their chart which told them completely wrongly that they could not head east and through that into that bay. Because apparently it was a bay, we know it's a straight now. I've been able to do that. I wouldn't be here talking to you about the loss of the Franklin expedition. Most historians say they would have got through easily. But unfortunately they headed this way. This is a bit like Captain Pugwash isn't it? The animation is a bit funny. Where there is a perennial sea of ice, very difficult to get through. And their ships got completely stuck. Now they were stuck 80 miles north of charted waters. So while this was a frustration to them they would resign themselves to another winter in the ice knowing that next summer they'd be a thaw. They'd get through and they'd be off to the Pacific. So a frustration but still high hopes and plenty of confidence. What they didn't know unfortunately is that three years had just begun in the Arctic where there would be no thaw at all. None of that ice would melt. Unfortunately they didn't know that. So the next May in 1847 having got through that winter of 1846. If it's James, everything had gone fine. But James was still able to sign off saying all well, underlined it for emphasis. Things were still going fine. Only three weeks later calamity. Because in June Franklin dies. It's not known what the cause of death was. It was probably something quite acute. Of course no thaw. It was obvious to all on board there would be no thaw and that they were faced with another winter in the ice stuck. When we get to the end of the winter of 1847 into 8 we find from Fitzgames's record now written in a very hasty scroll nine officers and 15 men were dead. This is a disproportionate number of officers. And that the ships would then be deserted. The plan was to desert the ships in April. They were deserted. And it's assumed this is now a Victorian assumption because all Fitzgames said was the ships were being deserted and that they were heading south. The Victorians at the time assumed this was the heroic death march to the mainland. And that all were dead by autumn of 1848. Now if you remember what I said earlier John Ray encountered Inwit who had met survivors in 1850. This doesn't match with the actual witness testimony. So the Victorian idea of this heroic march to the end and they were all dead by this time is not correct. The Victorians never tried to explain why so many officers died as well other than saying that the officers would have heroically sacrificed themselves. For the rest of the crew by hunting and so on. In fact as we're cynical though we are now it is that we'll see that's probably actually what happened. So the passage therefore in as far as the Victorians were concerned was completed because by walking to the mainland they'd made it into chartered waters. So they're all dead the ships had sunk but it was a success. And Tennyson was encouraged to provide lifting lines and this is what is on the Franklin monument which we'll see in a moment in Paul Mall. They forged the last link with their lives and I'm not trying to make light of that. They had died in horrible circumstances as we'll see in more detail shortly. And Franklin got his memorial. Parliament voted for a very nice memorial which you can see if you walk along Paul Mall to Waterloo Place it's still there. And at long last the nation could put this whole business to rest. Here's another embarrassing fade out slide. Over the succeeding years into our century 20th century memories of the Franklin expedition and its failure really disappeared. So that certainly by the middle of the century most people had knew nothing of Franklin nobody could remember it. But it wasn't the case and it certainly is not the case in Canada where the whole Franklin tragedy is very much part of their young history. And it's to the Canadians we now look to the final part of this saga. Because over the last 30 or 40 years they've spent an enormous amount of time and money trying to understand what happened to the Franklin expedition. And that has paid off spectacularly just in the last couple of years with the discovery of the two ships which were thought to be irretrievably lost. The arabus on the top here was found in only 30 feet of water and that accounts for her condition. Unfortunately the superstructure has been stripped by heavy ice passing over but her hull is completely intact and all the contents. And we'll talk about that shortly. And the terror more fortunately sank in 80 feet. She's completely intact the mast is still standing. You can see the bowsprit sticking out there. The archaeologists who have swum down to look at her have said if she could be raised and pumped out she would float. It's a wonderful time capsule that even the two privies on the stern for officers these only are fully intact and both doors closed. So the parts Canada team who have been working on these ships have a lot of fascinating information from them which we'll talk about in a moment. But they've also concentrated on the oral history from the Inuit people whose forebears were actual physical witnesses of what happened and who met the crew. And until recently their oral history has been completely discounted. It was discounted by the Victorians as nonsense because these people were quote savages. And of course the idea that they had met anyone in 1850 was discounted because well they've no sense of numbers or time or anything like that. How could that possibly be true? As we'll see the Inuit history has been very significant. But some of the early work conducted in Canada was to look at the remains of those three men who died on Beachy Island. And also some of the skeletal remains which are found on King William Island and you literally will fall over them. It's still skeletal remains scattered about the place. It's quite extraordinary. The next slide I'm going to show you. I apologize if some people don't like looking at dead bodies. And one of the extraordinary things about the graves on Beachy Island was that the men inside them were found to be completely preserved in the permafrost. And these are them. Quite astounding. And it was possible to conduct very full autopsies on them. And it confirmed that probably pulmonary tuberculosis was responsible for the deaths which was very common in the Victorian times. But what was unanticipated was the discovery that there were also high levels of lead in their soft tissues and skeletons and also in the skeletons found on King William Island. Now this has led to the hypothesis that the crew died, the expedition was brought to an end by lead poisoning which caused such extensive mortality and morbidity that the whole thing simply came to an end. This theory is a wonderful example of not allowing the facts to get in the way of a good story as I'll show you. Some of you will remember the late Archie Roy. One of Archie's sayings was, facts are chills at when a ding. And some of these Canadian investigators might want to have thought about that. The evidence from Beachy Island was this. Because some of the cans had been recovered, the expedition had their provisions in. And this was an innovation at the time. And it was concluded because some of the cans, you see the lower right there, had evidence that the seams on the cans had been sealed with copious amounts of lead solder. And this had got into the food, eaten and had then poisoned the crew. And certainly the can on the top left there, you'll see that the invention of the can opener came after the invention of the can. Because to get into these things you needed a hammer and a chisel. And this is actually one from the expedition itself, which is held at the National Maritime Museum. Now, the interpretation of this, these data was that, and I quote here from a paper written, and which has received huge amounts of public attention, has become part of a bestselling book, that these frail, adult men, their brains and bodies poisoned with lead staggering across the ice. This was meant to portray the end of the Franklin expedition. Well, the fact is, Adrian Bowman and I have gone through all the medical records of the search ships, which went to the Arctic to look for Franklin. They were identically provisioned and none of those medical records, and there's 1500 of them we've been through. None of them show any of the signs and symptoms of lead poisoning at neurological and gastric, which are well recognised. If it didn't poison the search ships, it's difficult to see how it poisoned the Franklin crew. Also, it's unfortunate that people didn't do their homework, because in 1960 a paper was published by a new scientist where these cans were analysed. Not because anyone thought they might have been lead poisoning, but it's analysed routinely to see what the contents were like, and it looked for metals in the contents. And found that levels of lead were either nil or very low. So this story really was something that ran away with itself. And it also neglects the fact that in the 19th century in Britain, lead was absolutely everywhere. It's astounding compared to what's permitted today. It was in the water, it was in the food. Red Leicester cheese was adulterated with red lead to give it its healthy red hue. You could buy over the counter acetate of lead to treat your diarrhea or whatever else, hemorrhage and all sorts of things. So the population was exposed to enormously high levels of lead, and it's known that the levels of lead in skeletal material from that time is very high. So, given that the Franklin crew was recruited from that population, their levels of lead would have been high anyway. And some Canadian researchers recently have used some very clever x-ray analysis to show that the lead in the skeletal material from the Franklin crew was deposited before they went on the expedition. And it did not increase during the expedition, and that really is a clincher. And Adrian Bowman and I have taken that a little bit further by estimating what the lead in the blood was at that time. And again, the morbidity associated with the level of blood in the lead would have been very low or nil. So if you only take one message away from this evening, please disregard what it says in Wikipedia. The Franklin expedition did not succumb to lead poisoning. If you believe that, my work is done. Thank you. So it equilates to the scurvy, which is common on these ships, and which should affect some of the Franklin crew did not do for them, and nor was there any medical factor that's been found that can explain it. So what would have caused these deaths over that winter? Well, and this is where our discussions with Parks Canada have been very helpful. They have pointed out a number of things to us that, while stuck in the ice, the officers and other crew would not have just sat there passively. For a start, their provisions were running out. They'd have gone hunting, and hunting in the Arctic for the search ships was highly perilous. Some extraordinary escapades there where officers were lucky to escape with their lives because hunting fell to the officers primarily. By the way, this fellow who's lying at the feet of the polar bear is sadly going to be sadly disabused at the idea it works with brown bears and grizzly bears.  Polar bears aren't taken in by that, sadly. And he's just about to find that out. In a way, an adult male weighs two thirds of a tonne. Nothing stops a polar bear. So these would explain a number of deaths, and also the fact, and it's the Maritime Museum historians who have come up with some evidence for this, that some of the crew would have been sent back in the hope. Of contacting search ships, which they would be sure were up near Beachy Island in that long straight there. I can say more about that later if you're interested. Clearly, they didn't make it. They didn't manage to make contact. We can say more about that. And finally, they were up against the weather. The arctic weather was something they were not prepared for. This is data that Adrian Bowman primarily has prepared. And it's from one of the search ships that unwittingly was only 200 miles north of where Franklin's ships were in the winter of 1948 to 1949. Now you can see the temperatures there, minus 60 degrees. You cannot survive in that wearing a standard issue Royal Naval Greatcoat winter cape boots and mittens. That's not survivable if you're stuck in snow away from the shelter of a ship. So this undoubtedly caused numerous deaths. And it caused numerous deaths in the search ships as well. And if you look, as you see as the 1849 goes on and the summer comes on, the temperatures start to rise above freezing. And this, at long last, is where the thaw began. And this is the final section of our little story, which is a short section. You'll not have to be pleased enough. In it 49 probably, maybe in 1850, the thaw occurred which released the ships. And it's thought that they may have travelled in concert. It's not clear. They travelled south to these positions here where they were found just a few years ago by Parks Canada. The Arab is first in 2014 and the terror just two years ago. It seems that what happened to the two ships at this point is very different. And we'll look at that quickly. Let's focus on the terror and where she was just off King William Island. Now when she was, when the terror was in this position, it's known also from the Inuit testimony that there was a tented camp from the men on board onshore, which was found by the Inuit in 1849 or 50. The Inuits also report that they'd visited the ship where they'd been rough handled by the crew but an officer had stopped them and had given them something to eat to calm them down. And had pointed to this tented camp some miles away on the shore and said to them, you must never go there. You're welcome to come to this ship. You must never go to that camp. And later the Inuit found out exactly why. When they did go to the camp as they approached it, it was clearly, there was nobody there living at the time, they found arms and legs lying outside dismembered bodies. And when they got into the large marquee tent that was there, it was really like a charnel house with dismembered bodies, partially cooked, some men chained by the neck. One can hardly imagine what that meant and clear evidence of cannibalism. A very recent forensic examination of these skeletal remains from there has confirmed without any shadow of a doubt from the cut marks on the skeletons, these are consistent with the body being dismembered to be eaten. And also some of the evidence is completely consistent with murder. Some of these men were killed deliberately. Well the Inuit later encountered, remember 1850, 40 men assumed to be survivors from this camp although they may have come from the terror herself. And they were very ill, the Inuit gave them some food but they went on their way, they couldn't really help them. And later 1850 or 51 they reported finding their scattered corpses. As part of the testimony, an Inuit woman in old age remembered what she'd seen as a girl of these men. And what was clearly the last moments, the last throws, the wolves were very thick meaning the wolves were everywhere. Only one man was living, he sat on the sandy beach, his head resting in his hands, unless he died. A very grim end I'm sure you'll agree to whatever happened to the men of HMS terror. HMS Erebus, a slightly different tale. The Inuit were aware of her presence in that position there and they were aware that there were men alive and active on board. They didn't go near the ship but they waited till that activity appeared to have died down and approached certain and went on board where they found one man dead in a bunk and leading from the ship eastwards the footprints of three men and a dog. Now that dog can only have been old Neptune who had survived despite it all. And you might infer, it's a reasonable inference, that men who would not eat their dog would not eat each other. So the way things went for the two ships may have been rather different. Now the next bit of Inuit testimony that's quite fascinating is that away over here in Repulse Bay where there was a substantial Inuit encampment at that time, two men appeared and said that they had walked from the east and it's a heck of a long way, it's approximately 300 miles. Now if there were two men originally there were three and old Neptune clearly one man and poor old Neptune had succumbed somewhere along the way. But the Inuit recognised one of the men who had appeared, they called him Crozar and this was, remember Crozar had a long history in the Arctic, the Inuit knew him very well. And they were adamant that Crozar was one of the men who appeared, who the other man was is not known. They were in very bad way, the Inuit looked after them and got them restored to reasonable health and showed them how to go on eastwards to the coast where they could find Hudson Bay Post and hopefully rescue. Unfortunately to get there meant travelling through an area where First Nation people lived who were extremely hostile and if they went that way there was no way that they were going to survive and we assume that's what happened to them. The interesting thing is though that Crozio before he left the Inuit said he spent a lot of time writing in a big book and he had lots of papers with him that he had writing on. And he gave that in a satchel to the Inuit but they couldn't understand what he wanted them to do with it. And when he'd gone they had no idea really what to do so they gave it to the children in the camp so of course it ended up being scattered, all the material ended up being scattered to the four winds and historians are confident that that was the end of any formal records of the Franklin expedition. But maybe not and this is where we come to Parks Canada in this last couple of minutes. Their discovery of the ships has opened up all sorts of new possibilities. The top left there, this is on Erebus, you'll see if you've sharp eyed this isn't the officers mess, they had willow pattern crockery there, nothing but the best for them, you can probably see one of them there. And really quite astounding things are being brought out of these two ships. The bottom left there, a diver is indicating one of the stern windows on HMS Terror. It's fully intact, the glass is intact as are other pens and they can see through into the cabin which is the captain's cabin and that the door on the other side is closed and it's what apparently is called in archaeological terms a sealed environment. So anything that was in that room when the ship went down will still be there and apparently if any written materials are in that room and in a secure drawer or something like that with modern conservation techniques they can be made fully legible. So if for example a ship's log is left there and they were kept in duplicate or one of the surgeon's records they were kept in triplicate or any officer's diary is in that room it may well explain everything that happened to these men and this ship. They've also found personal effects, they've found this shoe, it's an officer's shoe from the Airbus and have extracted DNA from it and because the Canadians have set up a very extensive DNA database from descendants of the crew they're very hopeful that they'll be able to tell who's shoe this was and the implication being he must have been on board the ship when it sank, they'll get a sense of who was on board. I'm not sure the logic of that entirely, I mean it used to say he was still on the ship when it went down but the shoe may have been but he may not. And most spectacularly of all they are very confident that John Franklin's remains will be found in a lead lined coffin in the hold of the Airbus. I can say more about the reasoning for that later, it's very plausible but we could talk about that later if there's any questions. We're rather getting ahead of ourselves here because we're in the realms of speculation now. Let's finish by thinking about what we know as a fact for what happened and how we might interpret it. We're always in the game of blame I suppose and there's no doubt that these four factors here played their part. The ambition, really a pointless ambition of finding a north-west passage which could never be exploited, the complacency of the Admiralty and first of all not having a plan for rescue and then taking five years to get sorted out for one and the tragic misjudgment of poor James Ross. Who never spoke of it for the rest of his life and of course the chart. But these are only contributions to it because basically what they were up against was the Arctic. And they were a naval expedition, they were not trained and they were certainly not equipped to survive if they had to leave the ships and it was never thought they would have to leave the ships. So when they did they were both literally and metaphorically fatally exposed. What I'd like to suggest to you is that while the expedition and its failure has been regarded as a catastrophe and a disaster and a shaming incident, it's not that at all, it's a tragedy where in fact these men really did their best. They were volunteers, they didn't have to go, they went to do their best and they met a very grim fate. And I think it's very unfortunate that even today very respectable historians, no doubt because it sells books, when they write about the Franklin expedition they focus on everything that went wrong and in particular the cannibalism. Which was a feature but probably did not affect, not all of them I'm sure became involved in it. And just to give you an example of this, is this really how to remember the Franklin crew? This is from Anthony Brand, he's an American historian in his otherwise admirable biography of Franklin. This is literally how the book ends. The images of pieces of human arms and legs cooking in a kettle while starving men stare with deadened eyes at the ultimate consequences of this spectacular piece of folly. Well folly it was but it wasn't a folly of their making and I think you might, I hope you'll agree with me that they deserve a better memory than that. So how about this? Had they made it through the north west passage as they were in the Bering Straits heading west as they made the exit which would take them around the Aleutian Islands to the Pacific, this is what they would have seen. And in the last letter that Harry Goodser who was assistant surgeon on the Erebus wrote to his father and Strother, this is what he said. All the officers are in great hopes of making the passage and expect to be in the Pacific at the end of next summer. Well it wasn't to be but at this stage they were fitting well, they were hopeful, they were confident and they were ready to do their best. So let's leave them there. Thanks very much.


I've been coming to Cornerstone about this church for about two years now. When I first started coming it wasn't very consistent so I would come every now and then. Mainly because I wanted my sin more than anything else and I wasn't that soon to come to a church where everyone worships about that despite the various things that I left doing. Before my attendance here I lived a wickedly simple life that was unpleasing in the eyes of the Lord. I had no knowledge of the gospel or understanding of what sin was. I had no relationship with the Lord. Another thing I did was for my own self-pleasure. I only cared about the things that made me happy. I was disrespectful towards my mother, the woman who raised me this day. Disregarding wisdom from my brother and made my own decisions because my pride wouldn't let me take advice from anyone. If I was alone in my room I would rust over women that I saw on social media and proceeded to pleasure myself in the corner of the room. I partake in unbiblical relationships and pursue worldly dating that also consisted of the virtuous acts. I covet over materialistic things rather than be grateful for what I already have because I was never satisfied with anything I was given to. So I was always that once and more because I see what the Lord says about me. God's existence to me was like the stories that our parents would tell us as young children about how Santa Claus is reeling if you misbehave or end up on his Nautilus. You've never seen him or heard him, but you should believe in his existence because everyone tells you to. And I didn't want to be on God's Nautilus so I strive to be the best person that could be according to the simple world we live in. I believe that my good works would grant me a country into God's Heaven but little did I know I was on my way to Heaven. I didn't find myself until my brother in the world passed away and reached him out to God about two and a half years ago. Around the time, my brother had been admitted back into the church. I had a situation with my then-girlfriend. Being the naïve kid that I was, I ended up getting her pregnant. For a short time, for a short period of time, I was a father and she a mother.  I knew she'd be willing to execute whatever choice I decided to make so I shut down every feeling of guilt, sorrow and remorse just to call a shot that I selfishly fulfilled my desires. In my mind, I figured that having a child at that point in time was more of a burden than a blessing because the timing wasn't there and neither was my brain. Ultimately, I decided it would be best for us both to have her again abortion. So she did. The sixth commandment says that thou shalt not murder and yet I made her take the life of her unborn child simply because I didn't want to deal with it at the time. Even though the child hadn't been born yet, it was still living in the mother's womb. After things were said and done between us, I cried out to my brother for help because I was afraid of being kicked out of my mother's house. After having been filled in on the situation, he used this as an opportunity to preach the gospel to me. The Lord used my sin to open a door for my brother. When I was in high school, I used to call in the well whenever I needed help with any homework that was math related and we would sit on the phone for hours because instead of simply giving me the answers to the problem I had, he filled his role as an older brother and taught me how to work out the problems. With the experience he had from helping me with homework, he had an understanding of how I think. So he knew exactly how to teach me. And even though we're over a decade apart in age, he understood that if he was going to relay information to me in a way that I could understand him, he would have to be relatable to me. And I say all this because this is exactly how he preached the gospel to me. With my very little understanding of Christ and his work on the cross, it was evident that he would have to educate me in a way that I could understand. So to this day when he explains things to me from the Bible, he goes into what I like to call his movie mode. I read a few verses and then modernize the text for me in between reading the scriptures, which helps a lot. It wasn't until summer of 2020 where I not only cried out to my brother yet again, but I also cried out to the Lord. After a great deal of pain, sorrow, and depression that I felt due to complications I had with a friend of mine, it became clear to me how much I needed Christ in my life. I had still been living in my sin, but I realized something had changed when I said to the Lord, plant a seed in me. Then my brother's preaching of the Word. This is something I speak of his conviction. Almost everything I did was simple. That was simple, less conviction in my life. My desire for sin had slowly been fading away. I texted my brother and told him that I have a desire to be saved by the Lord and to live my life according to Christ. Ever since that day I've been coming to Cornerstone consistently. Shortly after contacting Noel, he needed someone to watch over his apartment and manage his Airbnb while he was on a business trip in Chicago for about two to three months. So I accepted the responsibilities. At the time my only way of coming to church was if Noel picked me up and since he was in Chicago I no longer had a writing. So it was my job to figure out a way to come to church while he was gone. And that's when I hit up Pastor Dale to see if he would be able to bring me to church at least until Noel came back. Thank you Pastor Dale. That's when I knew I had a hunger for Christ because even though my usual driver wouldn't bring me to church I had Uberdale. So I had stopped me from listening to God's word in front of the preacher and attending fellowships. I struggled with assurance for a few months because I still lacked proper understanding of the gospel. After being in a church surrounded by golly men and women whom all love the Lord and having such great pastors to remind us of who we are and why we need to be reminded of the gospel it became clear to me that my salvation is a grace of the Lord and a product of His work on the cross. God sent His only begotten Son Jesus to die for our sins on the cross so that we may have a way of knowing Him and His Father and being able to enter the kingdom of God. Christ gave me a new heart and I am born again in Christ. Since my conversion I now hunger and thirst to do with things that are pleasing to the Lord. My desires are no longer set on the things that are pleasing to my flesh but are now fixating on doing things that are pleasing to Him. Being saved doesn't mean you're not perfect. There are none who are righteous. No, not one. This means that I still have my sin battles. But rather than being enslaved to my sin and bearing shackles that time has gone to the flesh of our body I now have internal battles which are allowed to be achieved between my sin and my precious uses. Every day I'm reminded of how much I need Christ in my life because sentiation always rums the earth and there's still very many trials ahead of me. But I must continue to serve the Lord and be diligent and clear in keeping His commandments. If you're sitting here today, ladies and gentlemen and you're not convoked or you struggle with the shots I want to encourage you to continue to have faith in Jesus and what He did for sinners. I want to encourage you also to repent of your sins because nothing is possible without Christ. So you must continue to pray to Him and ask Him for help. I have moments in my life where I have my highs and that I don't struggle with sin. But I also have my lows where the devil is knocking at my door and just waiting for me to open it. And I'll close off my testimony with these words from Genesis chapter 3 verse 19 as a reminder we're nothing more than walking dirt.   Amen. A blessing for us to baptize Neo too. I love to hear the testimony of a loving brother preaching the gospel unto Neo and the Lord using the preaching of the gospel to save them. And now you'll be able to see Neo grow from the Lord just a complete joy. So grateful for the true gospel, grateful for our brother and grateful to have Neo here. So, it's our joy to baptize our brother Neo based upon your professional faith with the Lord Jesus Christ turning from your sin to follow Christ alone by faith. It's our joy to baptize our brother Neo to the Father inside of the Holy Spirit. Baptize with Christ through the death.


Okay, we're back live at EMC World 2010. I'm John Furrier, the founder of SiliconANGLE.com, and we're back for continuous coverage, wall to wall with EMC World 2012. We're live on SiliconANGLE.tv, and this week's a busy week for us, and my co-host Dave Vellante and I are breaking down all the news here at EMC World, but I'm going to fly tonight back to San Francisco to attend the HBase conference, first ever historic HBase conference where all the smartest open source contributors, the brightest minds in the leading companies are getting together in San Francisco for HBase Conference, HBaseCon.com. Go there, check it out, Apple, Facebook, Netflix, all the top guys are going to be there developing out ideas around accelerating the open source movement around big data. Obviously, Cloudera is putting it on, and Dave is going to be exciting event tomorrow.  It wasn't on his personal radar, he said, oh, I have guys who know that, but I'm sure he does, right? Yeah, I'm sure he does, but my point is that a lot of people don't know what it is. You know, I think a lot of people, HBase, that's new to them, you know, and I'm glad you're going to be there covering it because I think it's going to be the hottest trends, you know, of the decade. I think there's a war going on for big data. And of course, SiliconANGLE.com is always on the ground, and our goal at SiliconANGLE.com is to go where the stories are, and we will bring the Cube, our flagship telecast, to events where this action will do wall-to-wall coverage. We'll go to events in San Francisco, we're expanding our team, and you're going to see more and more great coverage coming on from SiliconANGLE.tv through the rest of the year. It's an exciting opportunity for everyone in the media business, us included, and that's great to have a great research team with SiliconANGLE.com, on the team with SiliconANGLE. It's been great. But Dave, news going on today, obviously, this is the first day after Facebook went public last week. It's the first day back. And a lot of big news on Facebook. The first one is I was there when Mark Zuckerberg got married. Actually, I was taking a walk around the block. He lives like literally, you know, 500 yards from my house. Did you stop in? No, I saw a lot of action there. I didn't know it was a wedding. We didn't find out the next day. It was about a small intimate crowd, about a hundred people. Mark Zuckerberg got married in Palo Alto at his house. And my kids were looking over the wall and like, hey, give the guy some privacy. Who was there? And I'm like, here's my phone. Take some photos. Literally could have made some dough on the paparazzi factor. But you know what? Give the guy some privacy. He lives in the neighborhood. Mark Zuckerberg, congratulations on your wedding. And I want to say congratulations to everyone at Facebook for an amazing IPO. And again, SiliconANGLE has an opinion on this. We were first on the record to actually say the IPO was a smashing success. Immediately followed by everyone else kind of jumping on saying it was a success. After the people in New York were slamming it, mainly because in the New York circles, it was not a good IPO. Mainly because NASDAQ had some broken trading on the software glitches. And too, not a lot of people made money in the free market. So again, this is another example where Mark Zuckerberg and team hacked Wall Street in the sense that they got what they wanted. The goal of an IPO, Dave, I've always said, was to raise money. That's always been the case for companies to go public. It's to raise money. They raised billions of dollars, I think 12 or 16 billion, all said and done. One, so they achieved that objective. Check. Next objective of an IPO is to get liquidity for your initial investors and shareholders. Check. A lot of people got liquid. Big check. Houses are going for sale over the place in Palo Alto. Real estate is going through the roof. So I'll see. Check. And three is to make the public stock available. And they put out hundreds of millions of shares in the open market. And that was an objective achieved. And also keep the underwriting costs down. The bankers, who are usually the ones who are in the news for gouging companies, got minimal fees. And they had to support the stock at 38. So at the end of the day, check. They're in check. So all these are check marks. A plus IPO to the general investor. It's still cloudy. Rather well, it is going to be a great success. I'm bullish on Facebook. I think I'm long on Facebook. I think in the short term, this stock's going to dip. And I think it's going to have the same graph of the trough of disillusionment. And then it's going to rise back up as Facebook starts to deploy their business model. So to me, Facebook's business model has to do with two words. Big data. Display advertising. Was there bread and butter? Billions of dollars in revenue off the massive page views that they get. But interestingly enough, Dave, per my analysis in my blog post, that their operating revenue has plummeted ever since Facebook opened up the timeline. And that timeline was the new interface that actually gets more user interaction, more data. So what you're seeing is Facebook moving to a data-centric business model. This is what's the theme here at EMC World. That's why this news is relevant. And I think that Facebook is going to emerge if they don't screw up their user experience, will emerge with a really killer data product providing contextual analysis, predictive analytics, using all the things of big data to provide a better user experience and ultimately provide transactions for end users. And that'll take the revenue per user into the thousands. And that makes it a $10 trillion company. Well, you know, you've made some interesting points the last couple of weeks or so about, you know, the display ads and sort of the bottom feeder of the ad business. And you actually wrote a piece that I thought was excellent. When you look at the three, what I consider a massive, you know, internet-based IPOs, Netscape obviously first, very frothy, not really any business model, sort of just, you know, got crushed by Microsoft. And then Google, with a very solid business model, you made the point that Google had a very strong, advertising-based, paper-click model, you know, AdSense, AdWords model prior to its IPO, very, very clear where the cash was coming from. And Facebook, a little fuzzy, you know, more Netscape-like. But because of what you just said about their data play, I think that's a lot more promise. Yeah, so I think, Dave, you're right on the money. And I think this is the conversation in the elite circles in the tech community to my point about the Facebook and being more like Netscape. Because everyone was comparing Facebook to Google because, let's face it, Facebook has been raiding Google's top talent since they started getting massive traction. So all the top executives at Facebook are all either ex-Google-ers or super geeks from Firefox and or these alpha geek communities, small startups that they've acquired. So on the business side, a lot of Google talent. On the tech side, a lot of emerging alpha engineers and hackers. That being said, it's easy to make the comparison of Facebook's like the next Google. But not really. They're more like Netscape. Netscape's browser was a watershed moment for the industry when the internet was hitting the scene, the web. And Netscape failed when Microsoft crushed them with their predatory moves around the browser and operating system. But unlike Google, Facebook has not yet emerged with that killer business model. When Google went public, they actually had years under their belt with cost per click advertising. It was a cash machine as pointed out by guys like John Patel who wrote a book about it. And Google was absolutely definitively had a solid business model. Organic search value proposition and paid advertising. Facebook doesn't have that. So that's why I think it's more like Netscape. So the risk here is that Facebook could become Netscape if a new entrant comes in and attacks the market can put risk on Facebook. That being said, I think they're going to be more like Google. I personally believe that Facebook is too strong of a company. The talent inside the company is strong. I think they have a young CEO in Mark Zuckerberg and a very lean hacker mentality. And David, I think that I'm bullish on Facebook.  I wonder if you're ready to share that? I'm not ready to share that unless we want to dive into it a little prematurely. I'm tracking a major story developing here at EMC World. I got sources ringing me all morning. I was up at six o'clock in the morning. I'm getting texts as we speak from sources inside the company. I see a major thing going on with VMware and EMC. Stay tuned. I hope to get more information. You'll hear it here first on SiliconANGLE.tv. There's some really amazing breaking news coming down the pike. Again, it's rumor speculation at this point. I'm waiting to get some more confirmation. There's some huge things going on at the upper levels of EMC, VMware, and another company that I want to talk about. This is going to be a game changer. It's going to change the landscape of those two companies. I don't want to do any more teasing out than that. If you're watching right now, watch SiliconANGLE.com, watch theCUBE. We're going to break that story for you. The big news here, of course, is 4,200 product announcements. Actually, it's 4,200 from EMC spanning the VMAX line, the VNX line, the Atmos line, the Isilon line. We heard from Rick Wallsworth earlier about DataBridge and AppSync. BRS, we had B.J. Jenkins on. He's talking about new Avamar and new products from data domain. They added boost to Green Plum. A lot of stuff going on here, John. I'm looking at the news around the web and on SiliconANGLE in particular. There's a lot of interesting news happening going on. One, Kit Dodson, a contributor at Atmos.com, has got a good story. The White House chooses budget official as successor for the cybersecurity chief. Here's an interesting story. The guy who was the cybersecurity czar, Howard Schmidt, is retiring to spend more time with family and friends and ride his motorcycle. A strange atmosphere of legislation around the state of cybersecurity. Security is the hottest thing going on around the globe. We're hearing it also within the enterprise. This guy just up and quits to ride his motorcycle. Doesn't smell right. A huge tap to replace this guy is a 17-year veteran of the Office of Management and Budget, National Security Division. I'm questioning that move. Obviously, the implications and the optics are interesting, and we're going to keep on following that. Alex Williams has a story about EMC's flash strategy. It's the first about a concept of data decay. Obviously, betting that data velocity demands of spinning disk are going to be more of a backup and recovery. The role of flash has become paramount. Alex has a great story on that. Finally, Bert Latimore wrote up a story around David Floyd's article around limited value of Oracle's Exadata. David Floyd, a chief researcher at Wikibon, wrote a post about Exadata, and apparently in digging around and from his analysis it's not doing as well as it could be. That's interesting. We're going to continue to watch that. Just in general, you're just seeing a lot of activity and as I talked about at the big stage here at EMC World, the number one trend driving this disruption in this business right now is the consumerization of IT. The consumerization and that is about applications, smart phones and all that's totally impacting the enterprise. And the enterprise or IT is one of the most exciting areas right now. We're in Silicon Valley. The top VC's are investing heavily in IT and enterprise. So, again, a lot of great stuff going on. Enterprise and IT is a hot investment area for startups. It's also an innovation ground for the big players like EMC and VMware and Cisco and Brocade and those guys are absolutely rolling out big moves around cloud and big data. For EMC, it's pretty clear what their strategy is. Cloud is about IT revolution or evolution and big data is about business analytics and that the business value, the business transformation in analytics and big data is a key thing. And on the product side, cloud is about IT infrastructure. Put them two together, you have the perfect storm for innovation. So that's kind of the latest news. We're here at siliconangle.com to continue this coverage of EMC World 2012. I'm John Furrier, the founder of siliconangle.com and we have wall-to-wall coverage, 8 hours a day today, tomorrow and Wednesday. I'll be in San Francisco tomorrow with my team up there covering the HBASE conference and I just wrote a post on siliconangle.com around HBASE and so watch siliconangle.com for all the coverage from EMC World and all the coverage from HBASE conference tomorrow and we'll be right back after the short break with our next guest.


I want that to be the intro. Jim Mepham. I'm serious. I'm Harry Wilson. I'm Chris Mepham, and we're going head-to-head in a Wales Euros quiz. Jim Mepham. It's got to be a time fault on there, surely. Five. Miles off it. Nine. Seven. Fourteen. Ten. Yes! I want that to be ten. I knew it was ten. Who was the youngest footballer to have ever played for Wales? Jim Mepham. Me. Absolutely. Who was the last Welshman to score Premier League hat trick? Sam Vokes. Bale. Jim Mepham. Romsey. I don't know, it's just about so much. I swear, I'm going to laugh at what actually was. It's got to be like a max amount of taps. Surely. Because you're literally just... I had two guesses. No, you said... I said Betel and Romsey. Yeah, but... All right. Yeah, all right. Against which team did Bruxy score his first international goal? Croatia. Can he name the top five Welsh goal scorers in Premier League history? Garif Bell. Ian Rush. Craig Balmy. Robert Ancel. And they've got to be strikers. No, they don't have to be strikers, they've got to be the top five. Good. Ranging breath. Gary Smith. John Arton. John Arton. D. C. F. M. E. B. H. M. A. I would have been not present there. I'd have kept working in my own. So, firstly, how many groups are there at this summer's Euros? Six. It's a great start. How many different post-cities are there? Six. No. 12. Since the tournament began in 1960, Spain have won it three times. Can you name another country that has won it three times? France. Germany. Who was Wales' top scorer at Euro 2016? Vale. Who are the only country that retains your Spain? I'm pulling out of here. The two highest Euro goalscorer in history both have nine goals. Can you name either of them? Thomas Miller. No. David Beer. No. Miroslav Krozer. No. Surely. Sergio Aguero. No. So, I thought it was Euros and Copper America. Sorry, my bad. Did I still play it? Who scored the winner in the last Euros final? I can see the guy scoring. Then, Adam. Yes. I can think of his name. That's good knowledge there, mate. Who's the only player to have scored at two finals? So, in the final of the Euros, it's one. Torres. 2008, 2012, scored in both. Mm-hm. When will this year's European Championship final take place? Copper America. Wembley. Do you rate your performance? Not burst. Not burst. You started off slow, and I was kind of staying slow. Yeah. Never go gone.


All right. So you should be able to see what we call the add on now. So that's the table of contents on the left. And if you've played with it, I won't bother you with that part, but the live search feature is in contrast to conventional search conventional search just front ends the wiki search mechanism that exists on jsoftware.com and the forum search mechanism that already exists on jsoftware.com so you can search for, let's say slash colon we and it takes a little bit and it comes back with 213 results in J programming, which you can load up by clicking three results in J beta J chat J source and a bunch in J general, which you can which you can load up the way progressive search or live search handles that same query. A slash code. And you get, I'm going to go ahead and shrink the browser so we can have a little more room to look at the results, yet color coded to column results, and the color coding is that rust. So for example this hit right here examples of the great operator. Rust is forum hits so great behavior is a forum hit examples of great behavior is a format and you can click to load those up on the right teal is wiki hits. And the way this works is we've got a, I've got a local sequel like full text index database of all I think it's about 5000 wiki pages, and all 120 odd thousand forum posts. As you type so I've just type of look for slash co I'm sorry and then on the left is snippets keyword in context. I look for slash co slash co. I get many fewer results because those two tokens occur together much less frequently than it occurs once I've got a slider for the years so right now I'm looking at back to 2021. But I can take that back to 2019 2018. I can go all the way to all documents which goes all the way back to 1998. And now I've got paginated results page three page for page five. I can also say I want only the wiki pages and get those. I can all I can search for English as well as code so if I had we had Roger's last name, I can get posts from him and about him. And of course the one page from J4C that discusses the slash co slash co trick, which I think is described as having an economy that burges on sorcery, which I can only can only agree with. So that's the story. The problem is the local database that I'm going against here the local sequel like full text index database that I'm going against here is one and a quarter gigabytes, which from some perspectives is enormous. On the other hand, I think I mentioned in one of the emails.  In that sense, from a storage perspective this database is a rounding error. If we can deliver updates to it that is content for new posts content for new and change wiki pages incrementally and just have the basically maintain the index locally on each client machine, which I think we can I think I know how to do that with AWS again very then we can deliver what we're calling live search the live search feature of the J wiki viewer, I think in a pretty straightforward and economical fashion.


Is SpaceX planning to build the BFR in a Los Angeles shipyard? This is your space pod for Tuesday, March 27th, 2018. Building new rockets often means building new facilities, but for SpaceX's proposed big Falcon rocket, that also means taking things to the sea. The agenda for a special meeting of the Los Angeles Board of Harbour Commissioners on March 15th shows that SpaceX has requested a 10-year lease with up to two renewals of 10 years each. The board documents state that the goal is to construct an operator facility to manufacture large commercial transportation vehicles across 18 acres of terminal island near Long Beach on the former site of Powerboat Component Manufacturer at Southwest Marine. The proposed operations at the site are listed as involving research and development of transportation vehicles and would likely include general manufacturing procedures such as welding, composite curing, cleaning, painting and assembly operations. It's also stated that the majority of operations would take place inside the facility with exterior operations limited to transit vehicles, forklift traffic and the mobilisation of manufactured products onto a barge at the dockside for testing and delivery. The agenda further states that completed vehicles would need to be transported via water due to their size. Thus, there is a need to locate the facility immediately adjacent to the water. It also states that the site would support recovery operations conducted by space exploration technologies, likely referring to SpaceX's drone ship fleet and the first stage booster recovery operations. Given that all the stages of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy can be transported overland by trucks and the BFR is expected to be over 100 metres in length, it's likely that this new facility on terminal island will be developed specifically for the manufacture of big Falcon rocket. The Los Angeles Board of Harbour Commissioners has not yet disclosed when they will vote on SpaceX's proposed lease of the Southwest Marine site and there's been no official announcement from SpaceX regarding it yet. You can try and check the SpaceX Facebook page for updates, but Elon had it deleted. For the latest space news though, be sure to tune into tomorrow's live show every Saturday at 1800 UTC and be sure to like and subscribe. Thanks for watching and until next time, see you on Mars.


The narcissist would rather see you fail than succeed. When the narcissist discards you, they would rather see you being unsuccessful. They would rather see you unhappy and uncomfortable. Than to see you achieving something that you have been aiming for. Than to see you having your desired result. They would rather see you living on the streets with no money. With no one there for you. Than to see you in a multi-million dollar home. Driving the car of your dreams. They don't want to see you living a good life. Because that would only make them regret the decision of leaving you. That would only make them feel like they made the wrong decision. And that is something they cannot deal with. They cannot deal with a thought or idea that they dismissed you as insufficient, worthless and a failure. They saw you as a gullible and easily deceived person. Someone who is easy to fool and trick.  You're bigger and better than ever before. You have more money than ever before. You're more successful than ever before. You're dating people who are more attractive and more successful than the narcissist that you are with. That is something they cannot deal with. They're not going to be happy for you.  They're going to be wondering why you would never like this when they were around you. They're not going to self reflect and come to the conclusion that they were never supportive of you. They never provided encouragement or emotional support. They never believed in you. They were too preoccupied with looking for someone with more desirable qualities. They were too preoccupied thinking the grass was greener on the other side. They didn't care about you.  They didn't care that you tried to make them happy. It was never enough. They were very ungrateful and unappreciative. All they did was drain your charisma and self-esteem by taking subtle digs at you. All they did was throw temper tantrums. They focused on your faults and mistakes. They magnified your flaws and imperfections. They were never accommodating. They were never willing to fit in with your wishes or needs. They were never cooperative. They were never helpful. They were constantly dragging you down with personal attacks. And that is why you didn't succeed while you were with them. They didn't support you. They were never a source of strength or comfort for you. And now you've moved on and you're successful. And if you haven't already, you're going to find someone who is far better than that. Someone who is going to partake in everything that you have achieved. All of the special and nice things that you will enjoy. Things that they could have partaken in. But they didn't. They made that decision to leave you. They discarded you like you were nothing. And you're not the first person they've done this to. They've let go of a lot of people they should have held on to. And it's only going to come back to inflict punishment and misfortune upon them for their poor judgment and misdeeds. Because they were once with you. And you wanted to be with them. But they discarded you. They let you go. And then you moved on to become successful without them. And now they have to accept and tolerate their unfortunate circumstances. Narcissists don't live for the future. They live in the moment. They didn't believe in you. They didn't have trust or faith in you. They expected you to fail. And many of you may still be in a narcissistic relationship right now. Where the narcissist is about to discard you. They're ready to get rid of you. And there's nothing you can do to save the relationship. In their minds you can't do anything right.  The harder you try, the harder they make it for you. You can try to take their wishes and needs into consideration. But it will never be enough. They will never be satisfied with anything you do for them. Because they're not satisfied with themselves. They have low self-worth and low self-esteem. And they expect you to complete them. By fulfilling their wishes and needs. But it's never going to be enough for them. Because the root cause of the problem. Is that they feel like they're not enough. Which is another reason why they don't want to see you being successful. They don't want to see you replacing them with someone better. Someone who has a higher quality of character. At a higher level of ability. They would rather see you on the streets. They would rather dismiss you as insignificant. They would rather ride off into the sunset.  So that they feel like they made the right decision by discarding you. So that they don't have to regret the decision to leave you. The last thing they want to see. Is you reviving yourself. Being renewed after their destruction. And proving them wrong. It's not easy to go from being at the brink of death. To being successful. To go from the bottom to the top.  And in such a short period of time. That is not an easy thing to do. But don't expect the narcissists to congratulate you. Don't expect them to acknowledge your success. Because they never wanted to see you succeed. They never wanted to see you shine. They wanted everyone else to shine at your expense. And when they discard you. They want to see you fail. They want to see you being unsuccessful in achieving your goals and dreams. They want your life to deteriorate. After they have left you. It makes them feel better about their own lives. But when they realise that you've moved on. And it becomes successful without them. They're still not going to entertain the thought or idea. That they made the wrong decision. They will minimise your success. They will discredit you.  They cannot be happy for you. Because they're not happy with their own lives. But no matter what they say. No matter how they try to minimise your success or discredit you. I can assure you. That if you have become successful after they discarded you. They do regret the decision. In fact they think it's the biggest mistake they ever made in their entire lives. It's like they had the winning lottery ticket. They could have won the jackpot. But they just threw it in the trash. And that is really the ultimate revenge. After everything they did to you. After they wanted to see you fail. After they wanted to see you on the streets with no one. After everything they put you through. You have the right to live your best life.