Humans create cities to separate us from Earth's natural environment. You have to wonder just when and how we came up with this concept of the utopia. Think about this. If we had evolved here with the other animals, then why are we not adapting to our surroundings? The fact of the matter is that we aren't adapting, instead we are changing the world. Everything about the presence of human beings on this planet screams that we are in distress. As a result of our distress, we are affecting our surroundings as we try to work out just what it is we are doing here. Animals fear us. Why is that? Of course, we assume it is because of our predatory instinct and the fact that we hunted these animals for food that has made certain species afraid of us. But doesn't it also suggest that the Earth's animals are afraid of us because they are not used to us being here? Humanity is no doubt evolving on the Earth, but not through physicality. Our minds are evolving as our awareness of our surroundings is growing and as a collective species we are leaning towards collective awareness. This could still be thousands of years away, but there are signs that we are breaking free from limited thought progression and beginning to use our intuition. This could lead to higher use of our brains which could possibly evoke psychic abilities that the greatest thinkers of our kind have seemingly managed to develop. Researchers like Srinivasa Ramanujan who clearly states that he visited a separate realm of reality to gain his overwhelming understanding of the mathematics. In the 1800s and early 1900s Ramanujan was shown certain equations that were long considered in the realm of impossible understanding. Not only did this great thinker solve the problem, he improved upon it using highly encoded masks that he was not trained to discover, nor was he educated in such a way that he was understanding what he was doing. What this guy was doing was remembering things that he had seen at the Akashic record and with a desire to crack age old puzzles he was fetching his knowledge during his lucid meditation, a practice it is thought that he stumbled upon. Nowadays a genius is anyone that offers a flash of significant insight into a particular problem with a potential solution. This can also refer to someone with an extreme level of talent or ability, but you should note that every one of us has the mental capacity to be a genius. We are still trying to understand what it is that is preventing this. If you consider that when we go to the Akashic realm we are no longer on the earth. Our physical bodies remain, but we are in effect not present. This means that during sleep and in Ramanujan's case, advanced sleep or astral travel, our consciousness is leaving the earth. When we return to our bodies we are recharged and throughout the course of a day we are worn down again, but during this time we are able to understand things that we can't understand consciously. Most of us store this in our subconscious and never realize it, but in some cases when we remember we can change the course of history as we know it. People like Leonardo da Vinci, Nikola Tesla and Steve Jobs are all claimants to have visited this realm during unconsciousness. There are also documented cases when someone is suffering from a head injury and waking up with a new talent or ability that was not present before, and even millions of cases where the patient has seen some sort of light.  The Akashic record is the universal database of all knowledge and experience that can be accessed at any time by anyone for any reason. This database gets us named from the Sanskrit word meaning sky and is considered to be located in another realm or plane of existence. In order to gain access to its archive one would have to enter a higher state of consciousness and clear the mind of any and all distractions. This archive is available to any and life-form capable of tapping into its resources and its contents can be freely downloaded when required. If you consider that our mind needs to leave our body and indeed the earth to gain these knowledges, then we would have to consider that something on this world is hampering our thinking process. Dimitri Mindelev was a Russian chemist who is generally regarded as the discoverer of the periodic table. Mindelev also commented that his discovery came to him in a dream. In his dream, Mindelev admitted that he saw a table and all the elements just fell into place. Just like Ramanujan, he made notes the instant he woke up as to not forget his remembrance. Now, we've said it before, we are trying to leave the earth for more reasons than they are letting on. To think may in fact be one of those reasons. The final frontier is contested space. Nations across the globe are at work developing tools and techniques to survive a conflict in the heavens should it occur. With the United States appearing to move toward a more formal space force and in light of new anti-satellite missile demonstrations, it's worth examining where exactly other nations stand in terms of counter space capabilities. Consider that rocket technology is not the development of weapons but the development of cost-effective propulsion to take us across the galaxy. Of course, we have a long way to go, but does the earth have the resources available for our journey to the stars? India announced it had successfully demonstrated an anti-satellite missile by destroying one of its own low-orbiting satellites. In the United States, Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan used the test as an opportunity to emphasize the nature of space as a contested domain. But what are the current dynamics of contesting the heavens? The biggest changes to Chinese doctrine and space organization happened a few years ago when they created the Strategic Support Force. The impetus behind this change is terrestrial at heart. Given that the change occurred years ago, it's likely a response to how the United States relied on space assets during the start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. This focus on space in response to US activity is hardly a response unique to China, almost every country in the world now has an interest one way or another, and you have to wonder if these other countries are in fact testing out the effects of space on the human mind. On October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union's famous satellite Sputnik was launched into orbit and the space age began. Or did it? SD Tucker, author of Space Oddities, explains that while Sputnik may have marked the beginning of humanity's physical exploration of the universe, we had already been exploring it with our minds for thousands of years, probably since our earliest understanding of being present on Earth. During the 1950s, John Bradbury developed a new kind of telescope filled with an amazing 15 lenses. According to Bradbury, the more lenses in your telescope, the better the view of the heavens you would get. Something which would allow him to see the very edge of the universe itself. Which he said was rectangular, made of metal and magnetic. As far afetched that that may seem, it does however appear that we could be trapped. We could be an experiment or we could be in hiding. The Earth could be hidden to preserve all life from whatever forces may be at work to destroy it. We should probably point out however that John Bradbury is not considered a great thinker and during his lunar observations, he claimed to have seen giant finger made of plasticine emerging from the top of the moon. A remarkable sight indeed but one which nobody else was able to confirm because no other astronomers possessed one of his multi-lens telescopes. The reason no one possessed one of these devices was because by filling it up with so many pieces of glass, Bradbury ended up with massively distorted images bearing no resemblance whatsoever to reality. However it is these kind of audacious thoughts that we need along with the free thinkers to think for ourselves outside the box. In his 1950s book The Riddle of the Flying Saucers is another world watching. Gerald Hurd sets out a set of ideas that has long been the subject of science fiction but also pointing out that even our most crazy ideas, however crazy we may perceive them, are ideas born of something we have witnessed. Peculiar is a word that springs to mind when considering the idea that UFOs being sighted all across the globe were piloted, not by aliens as you may have presumed, but by alien super bees from Mars who were watching over us from afar and perhaps even planning an invasion. The author in this case using bees to describe the operator of these vehicles that no doubt have been witnessed by millions. But as of yet nobody has ever clearly viewed these pilots. This is a phenomenon that every country in the world is involved with trying to explain and it's unclear if any explanation has ever been upheld under scrutiny. In the olden days before we had the technology to really know what condition on other nearby planets were like, strange crossovers began to emerge between astronomy and spiritualism with self-styled psychics claiming to have traveled to places such as Mars and Venus using their astral bodies. For example, in 1895 one Colonel Albert de Roja, a Frenchman with a liking for both physical research and hypnotism, was called out to help a family friend given the made-up name Meet Riel who was suffering some ailment. Knowing his skills in hypnotism, Meet Riel hoped he could help alleviate her sufferings. He did, but during one trans-session, Meet Riel claimed to be rising up through outer space which she deemed to be luminous and full of phantoms, one of whom was a dead childhood friend of hers named Victor. Meet Riel spoke of visiting Mars in astral form before one day it seemed as if her body had been suddenly taken over by the spirit of Victor. He was initially puzzled as to why he was wearing women's clothing, but once he had calmed down, Victor explained that following his death, he lived among the planets, a form of existence about which he could give little information beyond the curious detail that all dead people had arms which also functioned as organs of affection. According to Victor, these arms grew larger and larger over time and were often mistaken for angel wings. At the time, this was not believed, but enough of an impression was made so as to record this encounter. Isis is an ancient Egyptian goddess associated with the earlier goddess Hathor, who became the most popular and enduring of all the Egyptian deities. Her name comes from the Egyptian is set, the seat, which referred to her stability and also the throne of Egypt as she was considered the mother of every pharaoh through the king's association with Horos, Isis son. That is all from us for the moment guys. We hope you have found these thoughts provoking and we do of course encourage you to let us know below what you are thinking. Comments below and as always thank you for watching.


Hey everyone This is just a another video today considered a bonus video. I'm not on camera for this one I don't really have everything set up, but there's a couple of stories. I want to talk to you about one of them comes from last Friday This one's actually something from three weeks ago, but it seems like a lot of the internet has gone unnoticed with it So I want to I want to bring up these stories because I think they're important and this first one is to do with someone that EA is looking to hire through LinkedIn. So if you guys remember Towards the end of 2018 beginning of 2019 There was some hiring posts out there on LinkedIn that kind of pointed to the fact that EA might be bringing frostbite to Nintendo switch But we really haven't heard anything about it since and EA hasn't really announced anything major for switch If anything at all that I can even think of all the time I had over the past year But they are hiring someone at Motive EA Vancouver has been looking for a talented and experienced rendering se to join them Working on a beloved and revered IP now motive from what I could tell online has Worked with dice and others on like Star Wars Battlefront 2 and currently an unannounced and unreleased Star Wars game That's in development So they basically been working on Star Wars and been assisting with that from what I can tell anyways based on What a Google a quick Google search is turning up And it says it's an opportunity to join a veteran team in the early stages of development who are working on a cross-platform live service game for both mobile and console Your role as a rendering engineer an ideal candidate will have professional knowledge of rendering technologies You will have general experience in PlayStation 4 Xbox one Nintendo switch PC and mobile hardware GPU to architecture deferred lighting global illumination shadows anti-aliasing etc You will work with the content creators implement features tools and debugging Workflows the expectations are to work with artists to collaborate bringing the vision of art director to life work with the lead rendering se to create cutting-edge Rendering technologies develop in the frostbite engine creating leading technology for games around the globe Profile and optimized GPU performance, etc, etc All the required experience and all that if you happen to be someone interested in this job You want to apply for it I'll put a link down below to the LinkedIn profile for it because LinkedIn is where most Professional companies are hiring these kind of these kind of contract workers through But yeah, I mean they are literally looking for general experience of PlayStation 4 Xbox one Nintendo switch and You will be developing in the frostbite engine to create leading technology So this is just further evidence that something frostbite related is not only in development for switch But it's coming to switch at some point in the future We don't know what it is because EA has obviously shunned Nintendo massively over the last few generations If we're being honest even back to the Wii even though we got some weird wonky Wii versions of games that ended up not being that great You mean I see the frostbite engine mark because the frostbite engine has been ported to mobile phones and mobile phones with worse technology Then the switch so it's not as if the switch can't run frostbite It's just a matter of putting the resources into bringing frostbite to switch and bringing the game that runs in frostbite to switch Right now any game they brought over has basically not used the frostbite engine Like even FIFA has been using an older engine and not using the frostbite engine That's why you know that's their excuse for not giving us a full FIFA game Even though it ends up being the best portable FIFA ever. It's still like not exactly what everyone else is playing So it would be nice to see frostbite engine brought over and who knows maybe it's just gonna be for you know FIFA Maybe it's going to be For something else.  I don't know what that something is But they're doing something for switch and who knows maybe it's gonna be exclusive or switch pro or something I have no idea. Obviously, you don't even know if that's a thing and we don't know if the thing coming this year You know Nintendo says it's not but you never know Maybe for the next gen. I have no idea, but EA is doing something switch related. It has to do a frostbite So just just further proof, you know about a year later since the last time we got proof Here's more proof that something is happening. Although it's very early in projects So we're talking years down the road before we even see anything out of it That's why I'm wondering if it's a switch pro thing because if it's not gonna come this year then you know 2021 2022 Then you know, you could start thinking on your next gen switch or something. So we'll see The next the sex one is something you guys might have heard about But I didn't talk about on my channel There was a rumor out there that Nintendo wanted Sora in Smash Bros. Ultimate But it was rejected by Disney specifically Disney of Japan not Disney of, you know Just the general company of Disney of America or whatever. We're the homebases So one of the most requested DLC fighters for Super Smash Bros. Ultimate is Sora from the Kingdom Hearts series Especially since Kingdom Hearts 3 came out last year compared to a lot of other suggestions This character actually seems quite like an appropriate fit for Nintendo's all-star brawler. He is an iconic character in the industry He's a unique character even though there's Disney ties etc What are the chances then of Sora being added to the game and why hasn't Nintendo already made it happen in the latest episode of the Kind of funny games cast this is last week So it's an older episode now the former senior editor of Game of former and industry insider Imran Khan and funny thing is Imran Khan Just a fun fact about him He used to work under me In his early days before he ever got a paid gig in the industry He worked as a volunteer writer for me at Zelda Informer, so I actually know this guy pretty cool He revealed how Nintendo had absolutely Approached Disney about the possible inclusion of Sora in Smash when asked to Disney was the problem Khan explained how it was Disney Japan specifically who was supposedly prevented any deal from going ahead So basically Nintendo really wanted to put Sora into Smash and they approached Square Enix and Square Enix So what we got to get approval from Disney because they co-owned this whole IP and Disney's like not not happened Disney of Japan just instantly shut that down It's not extremely surprising considering that Disney is obviously been working with Universal For their movies and stuff like that There's a Mario movie in the works and they also the universal theme parks if Disney had partnered with you know Disney and Nintendo had partnered up instead for instead for Nintendo themed parks and Stuff like that and Disney would would be making Nintendo movies Maybe it would have been different because it could have just been an extension of the partnership But it's very clear why Disney would block this It doesn't mean Disney would block Kingdom Hearts coming to switch because they do very much like money but obviously they don't think they need switch to to sell Kingdom Hearts and They're trying to be very protective of their IP as they always are and it might be hard to do a Sora in Smash Bros without a final smash involving some of the actual Disney characters That's another thing that could become a problem because I'm sure a Sakurai was gonna put Sora in there The final smash would have to include you know Like it has pictures here You know Donald and and goofy and probably Mickey and stuff you'd have to include them in the final smash because it's a part of the characters You know being as a as a character in this industry and some of the attacks and stuff in Kingdom Hearts So it would be almost impossible to put Sora and even if they were okay with Sora as a character Without including that the peripherals around him and all the references to Disney so Obviously Disney's super protective. It's shocking that they even like Kingdom Hearts still exist They shut down all the game development studios and yeah, they still like Kingdom Hearts go forward There's still any Star Wars games you made by EA so I Don't know it's it kind of sucks that because Basically politics where we're not going to see you know business politics as it were that we're not going to see Sora in Smash probably Ever is a long time, but it feels like at least in my lifetime We're probably not gonna see Sora in Smash that sucks, but it is what it is So I don't know you guys don't know which story you know matters the most to use the fact that Nintendo Apparently based on Imran Khan who you know made connections while he was a game informer You know, what's the bigger story to you that Nintendo wanted Sora in Smash and it pairs of Square Enix Maybe even did to a Disney of Japan's like a not not gonna happen or is it that EA is You know hiring someone To potentially get a major game over to switch or to help get a major game over to switch using the frostbite engine Whatever that game is now again motive just to give you an example motive studios here They are a subsidiary and all that jazz as I said, you know Star Wars Battlefront 2 And then an untitled Star Wars video game, which hasn't even been announced yet And they have only worked on Windows PlayStation 4 and Xbox adding mobile and switch into it would be new for them Again, they don't really have you know any other credentials other than that Because EA's Bioware Montreal was actually merged So I guess that's notable is that Bioware's Montreal was merged in the mode of studios in August 2017 So and the motive to open a new branch of my group So that's just a little background on motive studios. They own by electronic art Say they were merged in with with with a part of Bioware So that's just something to take into consideration as well. Is this a bigger story to you? Obviously, I want to see some EA games come to switch. I want to see that new Dragon Age game Which probably still isn't even coming this year. I want to see that come to switch There's a thing EA does a lot of really crappy things, but I really love a lot of EA's games So it's it's just kind of this conundrum where there's some things I really hate, but then I really enjoy I like Madden every year. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I know people are gonna trash me. I like Madden every year There's very few years. I dislike Madden So I'd like to see Madden come to switch I'd like to see a Star Wars game or two come to switch Even if they're kind even if they're kind of bastard eyes like Battlefront 2 I'd still like to have it on switch than not have it. There's just a lot of things I want to see happen But again, let me know what's the bigger story to you that Sora could have been in smash with Disney of Japan blocked it you know rumor of course or the EA apparently seems to be hiring someone to potentially work on Nintendo switch and Frostbite games You guys let me know. Well, what you think about this stuff down in the comments below I am Nathaniel Robledance from Nintendo Prime This is just a quick little video for you guys giving you a couple more big stories I didn't make it into my video earlier because to be honest I kind of found this stuff after the fact even though it's older stuff and I'm like, how did I miss it? How did I miss this stuff? This is like like big deal stuff. We're talking EA major game on switch We're talking Sora in Smash like this crazy stuff So yeah, let me know what you think down in the comments below I am Nathaniel Robledance from Nintendo Prime like subscribe hit that bell icon and I'll catch you in next video


There is a lot of theory and talk about the The six-seconders and the eight-seconders that are effective. I personally believe it is It has never been a conversation about duration I think it's always been a conversation about quality if the quality was good You will engage people with whatever time you've got If the quality is not good even a six-second or an eight-seconder is a wasted effort because if there's if there's nothing Significant happening there you're not going to get their attention So I don't think it is as theoretical and as Mathematical as it's made out to be there is an element of how do you yes attention spans have gone down Doesn't mean that the necessarily the response is that durations have gone down I think the response can also be saying how do you know in a day and age when attention spans are down? How do you get attention? It's a very different approach. So I think that is where I come from Like even if you see let's say if you see a web series today, right? even if you're seeing it every Two or three minutes. There's something really interesting happens and it keeps you hooked How do you keep people hooked is what we are focusing on rather than if they're not interested anymore? I don't think they're not not interested. Maybe they are distracted So when you're been when somebody is distracted, how do you keep their attention going is a different approach from when? A sound somebody is completely not interested. So I think it's been misinterpreted as not interested I would say they're distracted. How do you keep the attention going?


Hey there, it's DJB and in this video I have a very special unboxing. This particular model is not mine unfortunately, this is a commissioned horse, this is a highly soft after sculpture. I'm very excited to open it and give my first reaction to it because I've never seen one in person before and it's always so different to see all these photos of these particular horses that are beautiful and amazing and then actually having them in your studio is a completely different experience, actually seeing them in person and the details that they have. So resins for me are difficult because they're very expensive. I have a hard time spending more than like $200 on a model, like that's kind of my max and so it's really hard for me to find resins. Traditional kind of start at $400 and it's just really expensive and this one is worth even more than that because she's so sought after. How I kind of do it is they'll say I'll open up my resin commissions and then people send me their fancy resins free of charge. The only kicker is they don't belong to me and I don't get to keep them. They always have a sticker on them and this is fine, it's like a bunch of colorful packing peanuts. Let's try not to drop it because it's hard more than my real horse. This is the softest bubble wrap you see. She's smaller than I thought. Oh my gosh. I think I can just pull it off. Just lovely. So this is the Resin Horse Sculpture Amise by Jennifer Scott and this has become, it's taken the model horse world by storm and they released many amises at the Jennifer show and everyone went crazy for those. So these guys are really hard to find, really really cool to have her in person and she paints up so nicely and I'm really excited to paint a horse of this quality and realism because a lot of my work is just kind of on a prior model and it's good to do it so but it's even nicer when you have like a good quality horse because that really showcases your paint work. Now it's really hard to see but she actually has like super crazy veins all over her body so that's a really good close-up of her. The tail is so so fun, there's a lot of dynamic in it. The client, she's ordered from me before and she wants the brains taken off and the mane added. I'll leave the tail because the tail is actually nice as it is. So it is tricky though because I have to kind of match the style of the tail in the mane and she comes with not one but two bases. Super fast clay base, like there's nothing happening there and then this one says Anise on it and it has a little bit of dirt texturing to it. Oh she fits so nice and that's so cool, I love it. My boyfriend does like grass texture and stuff like you've probably seen some of his work in collaboration with some of my work but this is like a really cool large scale base. There's a lot happening that there's a lot of resin to work with. So we may do something with him and the other base is just pretty basic, pretty simple. So I have to discuss with the client what she's kind of thinking and talk to my boyfriend as well. I need myself an Anise man because that could be so cool, like have in your collection if you had like this crazy base with this beautiful horse on top. I love that. It's so cool to have these pieces in my house and be able to see them in real life and work with them in real life. Really, really fun. So look out for this painted Anise and if you have an Anise for sale let me know because we better. Thank you so much for watching and happy customizing and collection.


Welcome traders to another tick mill chart here with me, Patrick Manly. I want to draw your attention to the developing opportunity in the sterling dollar on the four-hour intraday timeframe. Pricing this corrective channel, looking for a potential double three correction here, ideally into the primary trend around 13355. It's from a trading perspective, I'm watching for a bearish reversal pattern from current levels, so ideally a close back through 135-60 to set short positions using the projected daily range high here, 136-11. So give it five pips above there, say 136-15, so risking 45 pips. Looking for a move down to retest the channel support, ultimately enroute to this 133-55. So picking up 150-200 pips there, risking 50 or 60. As always, traders, plan the trade, trade the plan, and most importantly manage your risk. So next time, thanks very much.


So, good morning guys. I'm so sorry we had a small technical issue with my laptop not working, but everything is fixed now, thanks to our great moderator. And now I hope I can help you out with creating the ultimate front-end UI. So, just to know the crowd, can I know how many people work on the front-end? Anybody who uses JavaScript here? Please raise your hands. Oh, that's a great crowd. Thank you. So, I will assume that you know the basics of front-end and I will move on from that. The main focus of the topic, I'm actually a full stack developer, but I'm focusing on front-end at the moment in my company. So, we run an enterprise solution for drilling and stuff, which handles a lot of real-time data. And we have an enterprise solution already and we are building a new one, which is a single-page application. So, we had done a lot of research to see which react or which JavaScript framework that we can use for it. So, I can hope that I'll share some of that with you and you guys can benefit out of that. So, I'll start off. What makes the front-end? Front-end is anything that you see when you open up a browser. So, when you open up your browser, if you see Google and just a search tab, that is again the front-end. That's the front-end to the Google search engine. There are some really iconic front-ends that we've seen and one of my personal favorite is Google. Because those guys, the Google doodles are pretty brilliant. Because every single time something important happens, they change it up and they prove the user connection to the product with it. So, front-end, if we think about it, it is most of the time we just think HTML5, CSS and JavaScript, but it is so much more if you let it to be. Because in the earlier days, when you started off, we had to hardcore every single thing. So, there are all these old websites, if you can see from the 90s or from the 2000s, they are all a bit dull, I would say, compared to the stuff that we have now. Because we had to hand code every single thing by hand. But now, we have this brilliant invention called frameworks. So, I use Twitter Bootstrap a lot. It has to be one of my favorite front-end frameworks. That made things so much more easier. So, earlier I had to learn all these HTML tags, all these JavaScript functions, everything. But now, if I have HTML and bootstrap, and if I know the basics of HTML and CSS, I can create my own website so easily. So, that is there. And then, about after 2010, I believe, there has been an explosion of JavaScript framework. So, if you look, you have Node.js, you have Angular.js, you have so many stacks, you have the mean stack, you deal with so many JavaScript fatigue, if you would. So, there is N where there is Angular, there is X plus. And we don't know which one we can use for the other. And there are so many overlapping functionalities because they are all JavaScript. And there is a very famous comic, I don't know, that in by 2020, people are assuming the JavaScript is going to run your operating system as well. Because that's how JavaScript is growing. So, there are a lot of things. If you're just starting out with JavaScript, that might be a little intimidating because JavaScript has not been around as some of the older technologies. But there are so many people working on so many different parts of it that it looks like a really disorganized chaotic community. But once you start on one side, you realize how powerful JavaScript is. And that is the reason why it's so popular. Please do tell me if I'm going a bit fast. I'm used to speaking fast, but if you do not understand my accent, I can totally repeat or go slower. So, from my personal experience and from the places I've worked in, I've totally realized that frameworks are distinct that can generate things. For example, like Bootstrap or React.js, that is much more easier to work with. Initially, there is a learning curve. So, you have to learn how to work with Angular or how to work with React. But once you learn what that framework entails, then it is much more easier to work through and create a better website. So, if you have the chance, always go for frameworks. So, always go for frameworks. And I think little by little, hard coding by itself is going obsolete. It's okay. So, let's come to the main part of the topic. I think this is the big showdown that I was advertised. So, when we started working on our company project, we spent a lot of time debating Angular versus React personally. I'm a bit of a React fan, but we have to look at the positives and the negatives of all technology before we decide. So, let's go into it. Angular 2. AngularJS 2 was the technology that we considered. So, AngularJS 1, it released a bit of a time ago. So, when Angular 1 released, it was a game changer. It brought so many things that people had not seen before, and people accepted Angular 1 so fast. And there's a thriving community support for Angular 1. AngularJS 2, on the other hand, has just released in number of 2016. So, it's very new. It's very fresh in the block. But I believe that a lot of people who have worked in Angular 1, they have a sense of community for it, because it's like a smaller brother. You know, I've worked with Angular 1. How hard can Angular 2 be? It should be something similar. So, it's better established. And of course, there's Google. So, you know, support will not be a problem. You can use it for an enterprise solution and TypeScript. There are people who are very strong emotions against TypeScript. There are people who feel like TypeScript is so restrictive. You have to use exactly how TypeScript wants it to. Otherwise, it's difficult. So, that is there. TypeScript is restrictive to an extent. But, consider an example. You're working on a large solution. About 100 odd people will be working on a large-scale website. To give you a visualization, I work in a company that deals with oil drilling and oil. So, we have engineers who are mechanical or people who work on field with the chemicals, with the oils. And they know nothing about them or anything. They just have to use the software. So, when we create a software for them, we need something. And they will have support engineers on duty in different parts of the world. When we create a software which is used by support engineers in America, in Germany, in the Middle East, in India, so many different places and so many different people handling that kind of something. So, you would need something that is strongly typed, that has strict rules which everybody has to follow. Because if 100 people are given the same task, chances are they'll do it in 100 different ways. And if you're building an enterprise solution, you don't want that. You want a single way in which one task can be done. And that is very easily achievable with TypeScript, I believe. So, that is why if you're building a large-scale solution which is used by a lot of people, TypeScript does have an advantage there because it's very structured and, again, two-way binding. So, as just a TypeScript, there are a few positives and negatives for two-way binding. Two-way binding makes things very fast. So, two-way binding was revolutionary when it was introduced because it gave really fast DOM updates when you use two-way binding. And I'll come into a react later about how it uses one-way binding. So, two-way binding, essentially what happens is that when you update something, Angular has an algorithm running which updates the DOM almost instantly. So, there is no delay in between when you use it and when it updates because it uses the cache in your client's side. So, two-way binding is pretty good. I used it once and I really liked it. And then when you use react, things change up a little bit. So, let's go to react. And, of course, the disadvantage is when you use AngularJS, it comes abruptly. So, I feel AngularJS, it comes in a 30-end on download, fresh download, which it's a bit bulky for a JavaScript framework. So, a lot of functionalities come out of the box for Angular. So, if you want to build a full-scale web application, you can just use Angular. It's more than just libraries, an entire framework that you can use to build your own, I would say, web application solution for a problem that you're facing. But, with that comes... it is a bit clunky because it offers more things that you can otherwise just ignore. And also, I feel that Angular is a lot more harder to debug because Angular comes in a way where if you change something and it will break only in runtime, not in compile time. So, if you have ever used Angular, I feel you would understand that Angular, during compile time, it might not even say anything but you're in runtime, it just breaks and you don't know which line to shake or something like that and that I feel is a problem with AngularJS. So, you really need to be secure or you really need to know how to use Angular because it breaks and that's a bit of a problem. So, let's go on to React. React is a lot more flexible. So, remember when I talked about AngularJS earlier, I said that when you use TypeScript, if there are 100 people who are doing a task, they cannot do it only one way because that's how TypeScript is created. But in React, I feel that there is a bit more flexibility, a bit more leeway. So, React basically creates components. You can just inject that and every single component, it's a really divisive component structure. So, it's flexible. So, if 100 people can do something, they can do it in 50 or 80 different ways. Maybe not 100, but there are multiple ways to do something and that can be nice in a creative framework. So, if you have a creating and challenging problem that you need to deal with, then React is a very good framework that you can look at. So, I would never say that React is not your rule because React is supported by Facebook. So, Instagram, Facebook, those are pretty high density data networks that you are talking about and React can handle that. React has much better performance in some cases than Angular because of how flexible it is and that is something that you can always aspire to if you need it. So, if you have a smaller development team who are comfortable with React, I would always suggest going with React because as you're starting out and especially if you're a beginner, if you're a beginner starting out with web application development, React, I feel, is so much more easier and JSX, okay, TypeScript is largely different from JavaScript or I would say it's a super set of JavaScript. So, a lot of things that you do in JavaScript is available in TypeScript but TypeScript has some extra stuff. JSX, on the other hand, we are always taught to never put JavaScript directly in between our HTML. So, even when we use PHP, we have those PHP tags that we use. So, when we use JSX, it is almost like using a part of JavaScript into the HTML and that is pretty nice. If you know basic JavaScript, you can start working with JSX and that's a very nice experience for somebody who's starting out with a web application. So, okay. So, now I had talked about Angular for some time and I had talked for React for some time. So, in my viewpoint, I believe, we can talk, we can use Angular if both are really scalable for a large deployment scenario but Angular is more of when you have a strict rule to follow something that you really want to follow a single way to implement a single thing but React is more flexible and you can do, there are multiple styles in which you can do it and if you are comfortable with using JSX, then React is much more easier and friendly to programmers. So, other keys in the park, yes. So, React and Angular are not the only two frameworks that you have to choose. One of the up-and-coming, I would say, frameworks is Vue.js. Vue is, I believe, simpler than React and Angular and it's pretty nice to use. It's really good with graphics of Vue and even though I've not personally used it, that's why I'm putting it as others. Rather, too, I have tried out demos and stuff and I have worked on it but Vue is, again, it's for beginners and then I've heard a lot of great things about Meteor.js. Meteor.js is a combination of Angular and React to an extent, so it has a lot of good stuff from Angular and React. So, if you want to check out, then Vue and Meteor are some pretty good stuff that you can always check out. So, which ones can we choose? So, if you are building your own front-end, which JavaScript framework or library should you consider? So, I hope you know that Angular is an entire framework while React is just a library. So, if you are creating an entire application, then you should always go for Angular because it provides so much functionality out of the box and it gives you very less decision fatigue. So, if everything that you want to build, Angular helps you build it, Angular gives you pointers and you can involve external plugins, that is all easy in Angular. So, to build an entire setup, definitely go the Angular way. But, if you already have an existing system, you want to upgrade the Vue. If you want to make things easier, that's where React comes in. Because React is smaller, it's more flexible, it is focused directly on the Vue in the MVC. So, if you want to focus on the Vue, you make the Vue better really. You can't really compare these two because Angular runs on an MVC framework and React runs on Redux, I think. So, Redux, it uses one-way binding. It's a different style of procedure, but I have implemented React in an already existing system. Just one part of the functionality you can use React for and React plays very well if you have an existing system and if you want to just have one single part that you want to improve the Vue on. So, for testing or for trying out a new step, React is pretty good. And React is really gaining popularity. A lot of people who have used Angular 1 in the past are moving to React because they like how React is structured. Initially, there is a small gap. You have to get used to the framework and the method of coding when you come from the MVC style. But once you actually do it, then the payoff is really great because it's much simpler.  But my initial plan for this talk was how to create the ultimate UI. Technology is always important because technology is the backbone, the way in which our websites are made. But technology is not the only component for our websites. So, this, even if you don't take away anything else from my talk, I would like you to look at this slide and pay attention here because this is something I really want to share. So, of course, you can use Angular, you can use React, you can use Meteor, you can use Hell, you can hardcore your site. But the value of your site for somebody who's using it comes from what is there in your site, how the site plays with the user who's using it because both of the use in UI and UX is for the user. The key person here that you should be considering is the user. If you, the most technologically brilliant site, if the user does not know how to use it, it's a waste because we need to create it for the user's palette content. Whichever website you do, please focus on what the user wants and focus on how you can play to the user's taste. So that can be localized content, that can be content on a specific thing. So if you're creating a blog about technology, use technology key phrases. Use things that you know the crowd will like. So always play for the crowd and effort. Effort is if you are running a blog and you want people to subscribe to your blog, you should always have the subscribe button or you should always have a dialogue box saying please subscribe. So it goes the extra mile to the user showing that you care about the user and you want them to know more about it. So unless you make an effort, the user will never put in an effort to know your product or service or your website because you are just one of the millions of websites that the user can access why would they care? So you should put in the extra effort. Put in the effort to give something free to the user or engage the user and that effort if it will always be appreciated and noted by your user. So more than the technology you use, be considerate about how you use technology, now you can engage. And so simplicity, simplicity, oh sorry last point is simplicity. Simplicity is instead of crowding a lot or too much you should know what the user is thinking or focusing when they come to your website and play for that. So I think that adds to the other two points I have and that's basically it. I know I talked a lot more on the technology side but I'll take questions on both of them. Thank you. That's me. Any questions? This controversy about React versus Angular I haven't used React myself but what I've heard from the people, what I've read from the people that created React is that React is actually only the view. So that in principle you could combine React and Angular. So React is a library where Angular is a framework to structure your front-end app. Exactly. Why so much? Why can't you just use both in this question? Have you had experience with that? Yeah, we did consider that. So I was talking about how we were looking at both to build our application. So we did look at the possibility of using both React and Angular but there are a lot of overheads that come because Angular has a lot of in the box functionality. So Angular can handle view, model, controller, everything Angular can handle and then you're bringing in React. We're using React for view that is because most of the time React is used for the performance because when the demos have done React has given almost 2-3 times better performance pure performance when compared to Angular solely because of how flexible it is because it's so small that it can handle data faster. It can do things faster than Angular can because Angular is weighed down by all the functionalities it gives but if you use Angular and then you bring in React to give all this extra performance it's very difficult to configure for one because Angular does not like React Angular does not want you to use React Angular wants you to do this Angular So if you try to bring in React inside Angular Angular will throw all sorts of errors and after all that if you manage to configure it the performance that you actually wanted initially that you're using React for was not really that it was comparable pretty much to using Angular and the advantages were not as good as compared to the setup and all that hassle so I think that is one of the reasons why maybe in the future React will release a better version which is lighter faster and plays well with Angular but as of now I don't think a lot of people use that combination because of that but I have heard that somebody has used it I have seen it in forums but it's like a popular icon you have not seen it it remains to see if it actually exists it should be possible theoretically it should be because React even though it's just the view it plays well with a lot of other components so a lot of things the business logic is already decided you actually know what you want to do with your website the only questionable or the only unknown is how you're going to build a website or how it looks like because in the back end you know exactly what product or what service that you're going to give and how you're going to build it you just don't know how the website is going to look like because the back end is already decided and that is where React comes in because it can help build a faster front end and that gives React focuses only on the front end so you can build whatever you want in the back end PHP, Java, Python or Node.js whatever you want to use, you can use and React just handles the front end so that is how React works any other questions? you said you're working for an oil company which is not the type of company where what I expected from the development to come from so I think I've put performance my speaker ties in the lag I think I've put performance technologies as my company so performance was acquired by a company called Baker Use Baker Use is I think the third largest in the world for drilling services so what Baker does is that we handle the engineering part of oil drilling so if you want to drill a well Baker provides the drilling wits it handles all that but all the data and oil belongs to the company which we are contracting from so if you're contracting from the ABDAB International Oil Compression they own the drilling data and they own the oil but we do the drilling for them so where I come in is that we have a technical branch which handles the data analysis so when you drill a lot of data is generated we need to plot that, we need to analyze that we need to see how we can make the business better by analyzing the data all these data to the clients we need to plot them there's so much thing we can do with that data and that is where we come in because we create websites that can handle all their data do you use all of these different frameworks or you have like sell them one of them? we have I think centered on AmpliJS2 because I believe I think that's the example I used because we have parts we have centers all over the world so if you need to do support all over the world flexible it can become too flexible so we need one strict standard for it I think that's the reason I am down now to the end but maybe in the future we will react who knows it's still under construction and when we actually do I am under contract to not tell you what we actually use so that's it thank you