My name is Kristin Antelman. I'm the Associate Director for the Digital Library at North Carolina State University, and this is Morris York, head of IT for the NCSU Libraries. And we're here today to talk to you about the library building as a research platform. With the opportunity to build a new library at NC State, which we'll tell you a bit more about in a second, we were presented with the enviable opportunity to think deeply about what does a research library mean going forward. And kind of specifically, what is the physical research library going forward in the post-print environment? So I'm going to start with a little bit of the story of how we got to the vision, and then Morris will take it over and talk about the specific implementations of creating the research program and spaces and partnerships for the Hunt Library. Before I get off the starting slide here, I just wanted to mention that we did a student contest called My Hunt Library, where we asked students to take pictures of the new library, and we got over 1,700 submissions, and this was the winning photo. This was a student in front of our immersion theater. The site of the new Hunt Library is a Centennial Campus, which is a 1,000-acre research campus adjacent to NC State's main campus. Centennial exemplifies the vision of academic, corporate, and government partnership. It was significantly inspired by the Research Triangle Park model. And in fact, the former Governor James B. Hunt Jr., after whom our new library is named, was the person that secured the land for NC State 25 years ago when he was Governor of North Carolina. The library was funded by the legislature in 2007, which was actually very fortuitous because if it had been come up for funding the next year, it probably wouldn't ever have happened. So when the library started to engage with the campus community about the vision, we tried to explore the question of what is the value proposition for a new library on a science and engineering technology campus in the early 21st century. The entire College of Engineering, which NC State is the fourth largest college of engineering in the U.S., is located on this campus and will be eventually when the full campus is built out. So there were of course many threads that we could have drawn on here that emerged from these conversations with people, and so we're really just able to follow a few of those to their natural conclusion today. One is clearly that all of you know that data-driven science is clearly a core environmental context for research that libraries need to respond to. And many libraries have already done a lot of great work in defining how they can support data-driven science through building infrastructure and services to support data curation and so on. But not as many libraries have built physical infrastructure to support these new research methodologies. So we asked ourselves the question, do we want to limit ourselves to archiving the results of the research? Or do we have a role to play in creating the platform to support creation of the research itself? Back in 1998, which I guess is 15 years ago, David Lewis wrote this article which had an enormous impact on me at the time. And I still, it's kind of a touchstone for me and I'm thinking about libraries over the years. He asked this question posed by the title of this article, what if libraries are artifact-bound institutions? And he wrote at that time, I still think that this is a profound challenge to us and I think it actually has new resonance when we think of this question in the context of the future of the physical research library. He wrote then, libraries are artifact-bound institutions and as such will be replaced as the dominant technology for information communication. As the dominant technology for information communication moves from tangible objects to electronic bits on a network. As this transition occurs, it is important to understand not what libraries have done, but rather what they are for. They are the means through which organizations and communities subsidize the distribution of information to residents and members. And he further asked, as the library fades at the channel for the subsidy, it is critical that the subsidy itself is not lost. And I think this is very much a living question. I mean, clearly we're still subsidizing books and journals and collections. Taking that question into the present, are there resources connected with knowledge creation at the present time that were like books and journals in the past, for which the library is the logical entity to manage an institutional subsidy? So returning to the data-driven science core use case, that kind of shows where we were, right? We still pay $20,000 for those four journals. The university is also asking this question, of course, right? So looking at data-driven science, the university is looking at shared investments in resources that may not necessarily be the best housed in the library, right? Like, so very expensive microscopes, for instance. Universities are looking at how those can become shared resources to pool the investment for resources like that. But returning to the idea of data-driven science, that core use case, is a visual data analysis that is often associated with big research data. And it's a core tool for both analysis and exploration of data. And I think this is the one that we really decided to focus in on with the Heart Library. We're not alone in this, of course. We see that several other libraries are also engaged with this question, visualization spaces. And these examples are from Brown University, the recent issue of nature that featured Johns Hopkins. And this is the University of Calgary visualization spaces in libraries. Our friends down the road, Duke University, also have visualization spaces and programs. So we built on the visualization and collaboration as kind of the core anchors for the technology vision for Hunt. I mean, there's really a lot more than that. It's kind of a core anchor for our research program. And once we get into the detail of that story in a bit, I just want to take a slight diversion and talk about why I think NCSU Libraries was particularly well positioned to be fairly aggressive in the vision for this new library. Just 30 years ago, we were really not a research library at all. We were really a not very good college library. So we weren't even kind of leading in the scope in which we existed back in that time. And you can see by the budget growth that we've become a research library level funded library over over a really rapid period of short period of time. And I think what we really did is we bootstrapped our way into being a research library through the deliberate strategy to invest in new technologies. So that includes both collections and technology staff. I think that's a critical point. But on the electronic collections side, I just want, this is another little diversion, but back in 1990, John Unsworth was a faculty member in the Department of English at NC State. And he and a few colleagues approached the then and still director of our library, Susan Nutter, asking for assistance to start up this new journal. And that was, this was a time when there were really very few electronic scholarly journals, electronic only. And it was quite controversial. So what the library did is partner with the Department of English that didn't really have a lot of resources to support a venture like this. And it provided staff, provided some space and supplies and places to meet and assistance with copyright issues and things like that. And then subsequently partnered a conference to talk about the future of electronic journals. And I think that really helped gave a nice shot in the arm to this type of forward thinking in the area of digital collections. So this is just a little side light, but I think it's really part and parcel of where we are today. So fast forward 17 years, a new library has been funded. And through a competitive international competition process has selected the lead designer to Snow Heta. And I think Snow Heta was critical to our success with their vision and their willingness to kind of partner with us.  You may know Snow Heta as the designers of the Library of Alexandria, as well as the Oslo award-winning Oslo Opera House project, which are pictured there. The local architect was PBCNL. And, you know, both PBCNL and Snow Heta will say that that collaboration was the best in their careers. They had never had such a productive and creative collaboration between them. Skanska was the construction firm. If any of you have done building projects, you know that they are a critical member of the design team, critical for success. And we worked with the sextant group as our AB consultants. And I really just want to say again before I go off the slide that without any one of these partners just really stepping to the table and willing to be creative and work with us, this project would never have been possible. So it pretty quickly became apparent back in 2007-2008 that we needed, before we could get to an actual technology plan for the building, we needed a technology vision statement. A pretty well elaborated upon vision statement early in the design phase. This document, which was provided to the internal leadership team as well as the design team, was critical for coalescing around the vision, especially internal conversations in the library, I have to say. It was really a starting point for our work with the AB consultants. It allowed us to really control that narrative rather than having them come in and tell us what kind of technology spaces they were going to build. We were working with them on guiding that conversation. The strategy that this document took was to carry the concepts and lessons that we had learned from our successful 2007 Learning Commons project into very new territory. Showing that we could build on what was widely acknowledged to be existing successes, especially internally, enabled us to significantly expand the program for technology at home. We were inspired by many, so this is the Learning Commons project at NC State. But taking that to kind of the next level, we were inspired by, particularly just focusing on the visualization area. This is the kind of material that that vision document contained. It contained examples with lots of visuals.  We knew our core audience loved visuals, our core internal audience at least to start, and it ended up being a very effective strategy more broadly as well. We provided visuals like this. What could the library be? Two of these three are non-library spaces. Actually, all three are non-library spaces. The one in the lower left was probably kind of our Lynch PIN inspiration, the University of Sussex Creativity Zone. It really served as the driving force for much of what you see in the library. So these are the core principles that emerged and that were really our foundational talking points for all audiences during the design process. And we wrapped these principles under the overarching concept, the library as technology incubator. Each of these really has a dual meaning. It's both kind of pointed to the current. What we view as our current successes and our core cultural values as a library in the present, what the Learning Commons was already doing, but also I think somewhat subversively pointed to a very different future vision and one that was much more closely tied to the future and to the research library mission of the University than the Learning Commons have been. Our Learning Commons, like all Learning Commons, is really focused on undergraduate and study space and so on. So it's fast forward five more years and we had our grand opening yesterday. Morris and I actually ran out of the party to come to the airport to come here. It's quite exciting and what we see here is just some pictures from the opening itself yesterday. A few tweets about how students feel about the library. Even though we're not focusing on that aspect of it today, I think that it's fundamentally complementary to the success of the library research mission. And now I'm going to turn it over to Morris who's going to get into the actual details of what we did and show you some more pictures of the spaces. Okay, so some of these tweets are actually a really great launching off point into where we're going to go with what this becomes as a research platform, the core topic of the talk. The pictures that we saw, these tweets, really what people experience when they walk into this library is first and foremost an experience of awe. It's just incredibly beautiful and that really opens up their imaginations, which is what we wanted. It was like to walk into this library, people walk in here and see something that they had never seen before and really open up their conception of what a library could be and how they could interact with it. And we have evidence of that, right? So now we take that feeling of awe and wonder and inspiration and we dig down deep and say what can we do to actually take that and leverage it to promote the research enterprise at the university and how we augment that and provide something new of value. So what I'm going to talk about primarily is how we go about looking at the library building, not just putting research spaces into a library, not just putting learning spaces into a library, but turning the facility itself into an integrated holistic platform for research. So we'll talk a little bit about the infrastructure and then as well as some of our research use cases, the partners we've drawn into the space and how they're starting to use it today. So our core focus areas as we ask this question of what is the research library as a facility for these high tech disciplines, for the research that happens today primarily based in compute research, big data and things like that. The value we found we could provide was in large scale display, visualization, interactive computing. These were things that were not present on campus in any sort of organized way. There were pots and there were places that you could do large scale visualization and data work, primarily within colleges and places that were fairly restricted, things that you couldn't really get access to. So thinking about what could we provide in a central community place, a 24 hour facility that could really provide extraordinary value for the entire university as well as these disciplines. Large scale visualization and display was a clear niche where we could move into. And then the communications and collaboration particularly and then piloting and developing new technologies. This core idea of becoming a sandbox for technology and providing this facility where we can continually roll in the latest technologies for the students and faculty to work with. So the spaces that we designed within that building, particularly black box and white box spaces. So this went to the idea of sort of infinite flexibility in our spaces. I actually clearly remember the meeting where we sat down and Kristen and I had been lobbying for this. Everything has to be flexible. We need to change it around. And one of the architects kind of threw their papers on the table and said, you know, at some point we got to put down steel and we got to put concrete around it. There's no such thing as infinite flexibility. But these few spaces were really where we took that idea to its logical conclusion. So they're built like black box theaters for technology. The teaching in this lab is pictured here. You can see this is actually a shot from yesterday. We're standing inside of the Coliseum in Rome. So it has stereoscopic capabilities. It's 270 degree projection. We can create those kind of immersive 3D visual environments. And it also has 3D sound capabilities, which I'll talk about. But we can use these spaces to repurpose on a daily, a weekly basis for teaching research, the technology research and development, creating immersive environments for visualization. But we can also use that kind of black box environment no matter what technology throws at us. We know that it changes too fast for any of us to keep up with. The rooms themselves can adapt and we can roll in the latest technologies. This is our white box space. So what I mean by white box is basically take the same infrastructure principles, but steal some ideas from gallery spaces and from studios. This has movable whiteboard walls that 10 feet high and 4 feet wide. So you can actually reconfigure the physical interior of the room. It's got theater lighting kits, curtain wall system, projection on every wall. We got rid of all the screens that we could and actually just painted everything in projection quality paint. We can project on any wall, project on the floors. The students when they first took tours of these spaces started to affectionately to refer to them as the holodeck. So for all of us Trekkies, it was very gratifying to see that actually every piece of the building began to become associated with some part of the Starship Enterprise. So great for brainstorming, simulation, active collaboration. This is one side of the creativity studio and they're doing visualization work there. And this is the same side of that now converted into a maritime skills simulator for the Navy. So what they do up there is we're looking at a ship simulation. They can drive any ship in the fleet. So they change it from a battleship to aircraft carrier destroyer submarine and actually simulate the correct layout of any bridge on any of those ships and conduct ship simulations and training for their midship. And then to compliment those black box spaces are large scale interactive displays. So we have five giant display walls throughout the building, all of them running at four to eight times the resolution of your standard HDTV. I actually counted the other day and we have over 100 million pixels of display capability throughout the building. Your standard TV in your living room has two million pixels and that hundred million is not even counting all of the LCD and plasma screens we have all over the building. That's just high resolution display wall capability. And this is our game lab. The first one was our Emergent Theater. This is our game lab. This was specifically designed for the gaming research program at NC State, which is one of the top gaming programs in the country. The undergraduate program is focused on the entertainment gaming industry. The graduate program is focused on serious games, applications of gaming to artificial intelligence, medicine, data modeling and that sort of thing. And finally our display walls throughout the rest of the building. The talking about our teaching visualization wall on the right is the most unusual. It's built up into stripped displays. We really wanted to mix up, get out of the 1920 by 1080 box and work with all sorts of different resolutions, different aspect ratios, different configurations of displays to really work with concepts of how do we visualize the data world. How do we interact with the compute world and what are the different ways that we can start to see into that world. So as we make a transition from those physical spaces, so my, I guess you would call it a meme now, is that great physical research spaces require great virtual spaces behind them. Our conclusion with this building was it was not for, you know, half a dozen high profile researchers on campus. It was not for one specific college. These technologies in the spirit of a library actually had to be made available to everyone from your second week undergraduate all the way up to our most advanced researchers who had NSF grants and were working with the DoD and so forth, which meant that they had to be very accessible. You didn't have, you couldn't take, have to take a six month training course to get into these spaces and know the secret handshake and have talked to all of the right people. These are blown wide open. There's no limits to access. There's no restrictions, 24 hour spaces that anybody can use. In order to do that, we had to build the virtual and cloud infrastructure behind that. We had to make these sorts of large graphics applications, the tools to use them easily portable. You couldn't tell researchers that where they were doing their research out on the campus HPC, but in order to come in and use the VizLab, well, you've got to do it on our machines and you've got to start all over again. It had to integrate out into the campus research infrastructure, not only campus research infrastructure, but throughout the park. So going out to Duke, to UNC, throughout North Carolina and all the collaborations that we have across the nation and across the globe. So our focus was on graphics intensive applications of course. We're working with big visuals, rendering, you know, so we have a render farm which I'll talk a little bit about. But obviously if you're working with four and eight K graphics, which they call Ultra HD now, and asking students to create that level of intensive motion graphics, you can't just tell them, well, you know, that's going to take maybe two years to render out.  It's got to work very quickly. It's got to snap. So from the get go of the entire program of technology in the building to use those sorts of physical spaces was about virtualization. It was virtualize everything. Sink everything down into the data center. Have all of the computing, all the rendering, all of the graphics manipulation happen in the server room and they get pushed up the backbone. So we actually have, we removed about 95% of the equipment that would have been up on the floors and in the labs and sank that all down into the server room. And we just send visual results up the backbone. Once we sink everything down into the data center, it's all right next to each other. It's racks away and aisle away from each other. Now we can expand that out into the cloud environment. So creating that sort of central compute cloud, the new concept here was project cloud space. So creating a web interface where anybody could go in and say, you know, I need three desktops. I need two servers. I need a virtual network to connect them. I need, you know, 50 terabytes of storage for the project that I'm going to be doing. And I need that for three months, right? So now instead of checking out books or research materials, we're actually checking out compute power to them. And we can come back at the end of that lease and say, hey, do you want to save that off? Do you want to take your VMDK over to your own college infrastructure? Do you want us to just blow it away? Do you want us to archive that for you? And then we extend that out to external compute cloud providers. So people that are working with, you know, NetApp, Amazon, other sorts of cloud providers. And then extend all of that out through communications infrastructure. So through video conferencing, capture, broadcast, we actually, you know, completely blow the walls off the library. We can invite people from anywhere in the world into the space and allow them to be active collaborators with the research that's taking place in the building. So research infrastructure, as we put that sort of concept into place. The places that we really, well, okay, that happened too fast. I hope you caught all of that. Yeah. Okay. I'm going to talk fast. The private cloud, HPC and render farm display servers, any to any display conference and capture, high speed network and high performance storage on the network. In particular, we're working with a 40 gig internal backbone inside of the server room. And this is actually a schematic of that. So I'll just talk from this 40 gig internal backbone inside of the server room. 10 gig drops to all the major pieces of equipment. 10 gig backbone up the back of the building. And then 10 gig out to all the major of a pieces of equipment that are still upstairs. So ultra high speed bandwidth there. We actually have two networks in the building. One is a switched IP network. The other one is a dedicated fiber backbone just for pumping all of that graphical information because we wanted to remove that from the data stream. Moving over into the cloud infrastructure. That's housed down there as well. Creating that sort of dynamic cloud environment where we can allow people to create their own resources to check them out, where we can do the analysis of usage, work that down into the usage of the resources and reporting for grant purposes out on how many compute sources they used, how many cycles and put a monetary quantification on that. And then research computing itself. We do have a small HPC cluster in the building. We need to be campus HPC. We've got that. It's enough local computing power that they can bring their applications, their data and so forth into the building close to the graphics infrastructure and run their experiments, run their research in the visualization lab and resources like that. We have a render farm. So it's about 40 nodes of high performance computing altogether. 16 nodes of that is carved off just for rendering and another 24 for a traditional HPC stack. This is all graphics accelerated. So we're doing GPGPU. We're focusing on the graphics computing. Also have about 110 terabytes of very high performance research storage from EMC and Dell. And then all of our display workstations, everything that drives all the big walls are also down there in the basement as well. So you can be in there in Maya, creating your 3D environment, throw that to the render farm and then have the display servers pick that up and ship it up to the backbone all over that 40 gig network. So everything happens very fast. And then as we pipe that up to the high tech spaces upstairs, like I said, that's that 10 gig backbone and 10 gig drops to all of the rooms upstairs in the building. Just to take a little bit of a walk-through for use cases now about how we use that. So again, it's not just dropping research spaces into a library. And that is a holistic platform for research. So we're looking at life cycle. Research has many different aspects of a life cycle, as we know. It's not just walking up to that screen and throwing up the visualization. There's a whole process of work that goes behind that. And the building has to adapt to that entire life cycle. So everything from very early stages in somewhere like the creativity studio with lots of whiteboard walls, that kind of ideation, the brainstorming, a lot of that physical work that can go on with sketching out ideas to the VizLab, right? A closed space, locked the doors, black box, can do all sorts of that messy early work on the research, throw up lots of ideas and throw away 90% of it because it doesn't work. Going out to media production, now we're actually producing those graphics. We're working with that data. We're in a high performance using lots of different applications and manipulating all of that into presentation-worthy form. Interactive computing, we're actually putting those applications out for people to use. And then the graphics-intensive applications, we're taking that out more into public spaces, places where we want to do demonstration, where we're trying to teach with it, where we're trying to bring other people into the research process to get that feedback loop and finally to present the results of those research and broadcast them out to the community. So to take a specific instantiation of that with gaming. Like I mentioned, gaming is a huge cornerstone of what we're doing with the library. One, because gaming leads a lot of technology, it leads a lot of use cases, and it allows us to dig down into other aspects of research areas. So with gaming, right, so we can start with that concept development, ideation and design, move into the VizLab for that early prototyping and proof of concept work, come over into the media production labs for the cinematics, the graphics, the animations, and then go down into the game lab for that kind of critique, gameplay demonstration. And to show how the cloud environment leaves into that, all of that is backed by the cloud. You don't have to think about what room has the right computer in it, where the applications are installed, how do I get my data in there? You walk into any space, you log into the network and all of your stuff is just there. So it's really thinking about what space is the most appropriate for me and what application and what computer is driving it. So when we're talking about gaming, as I said, you have those graphics workstations, where you're doing a lot of that coding and creation, the render farm for producing the assets, development servers, we're hosting a lot of the code, the gameplay clients, code repository, and being able to push that out now to all of your mobile clients, your laptops, your devices. So finally now digging down into the research itself, what do we really mean by enabling research in the building? There's many different aspects of that, three primarily that I'll focus on. One is the platform research. So research on the building itself as a platform, how do we continuously keep that developing and keep the technology fresh? Applications research, how do we build the tools to allow people to use that platform? Just putting it out there isn't enough.  We've got to give them the tools and then academic research. So these are the grants. This is coming in with your NSF grant, your DOD grant, your National Humanities grant, all of that that we really think of as traditional academic research. So the platform is really about, the research is about creating adaptable infrastructure and technology integration. When we get into the applications, we're trying to create an API for the building, essentially that extensible API, reusable frameworks for how the building functions. And then when you get into the academic research, that's a pure research knowledge advancement. And there's a specific area of investment associated with each of these, right? So we have to create new models of investment, new models of sustainability. The platform itself is about corporate investment. This is the spirit of Centennial Campus, academic and corporate partners working together. The extensible APIs come from community investment, asking our community to create those APIs that allow everybody else in the community to use the research platform. So this is the shared community investment. And finally, on the academic research inside the grant investment, bringing in those dollars, getting written into the grants, having the entire research community think about this building as an enabler for their grant work. So just quickly, I'll run through a couple of elements here, just as examples. So platform research, we're really talking about how does this facility function? How does the hardware function? What kind of technologies are we using? Just as an example, so we designed, traditional technology designed for a building of this scale is about two years behind the curve. They want to make sure this stuff works. You don't go out on the bleeding edge because then it doesn't work and, you know, it's kind of embarrassing. What we continuously pushed for throughout the design process was don't put us behind the curve. If we stuck two years behind the curve, we're way too far behind for a research platform. Research is always on the leading edge, so the facility itself has to be the latest, the most recently released, the cutting edge technologies. Now there's a cost to that, which is that some of the stuff that we plan to install of the building hasn't even been released yet, right? So we're still waiting a few months for some of the technologies to actually become available on the market so that we can put them in the building. But that's all in the spirit of it. That's exactly what we want, right? Now, there's a threshold if you get more than half of your technology is not even released yet, well, that's a little, a lot of sleepless nights, shall we say. But it's where we want to be. And these are some of the companies that we're working with. We have over 14 corporate partners on the table to invest in this idea with us. To use the building for their own platform for research as well. If you put these beta technologies, things that haven't been released or proven out into AT&T and you get it wrong, they could lose billions of dollars an hour. But if you put it into a safe research environment where the idea is when stuff breaks, that's how we learn, right? So this becomes a very compelling environment for these companies to work in. So for applications research, this was a student, a PhD student in computer science. This was a blog post that came out within the first week that the building was open in January. And I'll just read a couple of pieces of it, but what I would have loved to see is an API for Hunt Library itself. Okay, so the building opened and basically there was no technology in it, right? It was stunning, beautiful facility, lots of furniture, no computer anywhere, right? So what I would have loved to see is an API for Hunt Library itself. Imagine if students actually had an interface where they could write apps for the library, right? Give us the tools to add to the library. So they walked in immediately new that this was something different, right? This is something I should be able to create with, but I can't because I don't have the right tools. So give me the API. And that's essentially what we're doing with the applications research, right? Create the frameworks, create the reusable components. We don't do one-off projects for anyone, right? We have developers, we have designers, we have consultants. We won't take one faculty project and say, we'll build this for you and it only works for you, but it'll be great because you'll be able to finish your research, right? We pass those aside because it's not sustainable. We can't keep that up. So when we take on a project, we look for the things where we can create a framework, where they'll partner with us, they'll build something that's reusable, and then we have a nice faculty member that comes along. We can say, hey, someone already did that and we know exactly how to drop your stuff into it. Just to give you one example, actually I'll save it. I'll come to a really good example of that later on and in the interest of time, I'll just leave this one there. And then on the academic research side, so this is my transition, where we'll talk about a couple of our specific projects. Clearly with making this kind of technology and facility investment, you don't want to just walk out and then the first time someone asked the question of, okay, who would use that and what would they do with it? You've got to have something in your back pocket, right? Hopefully a couple of somethings. So they don't start asking, you know, that conversation could go on forever if you can't put the right stuff and then to prove why you did this in the first place, particularly at a state institution. So these are a couple of our core use cases, you know, creating big data harvesters and business analytics for the College of Management, maritime skills with the U.S. Naval Training. I showed you a picture of that one. Gaming design, AI, virtual crime scene investigation, which was one of the coolest. I'm sorry, I can't show you more of that. Creating virtual forestry environments and things of this nature. St. Paul's Cathedral, I'll talk about more in-depth right now. So like I said, as soon as we started creating this, the core use cases were engineering, computer science, textiles, which is actually an extraordinarily high-tech discipline these days. But it extends to the entire university. As soon as you create an environment like this, it actually, you walk out the door and you start tripping across people that could use this. So digital humanities was one, right? And that John Wall up in the corner working with Joshua Stevens and David Hill. This was a multidisciplinary effort to create a virtual reconstruction of St. Paul's Cathedral, which burned down in the London Fire, 1666. The research question was, what would it be like to stand in the courtyard of St. Paul's Cathedral in Paul's Cross and listen to John Dunn deliver a sermon? So they built the whole 3D environment. They did lots of cool stuff, like sonar plunging of the original foundations of the building, exploration of the original documents in the lower corner there, as one of the original sketches of the cathedral, and create a full 3D environment. And then don't stop there, but give that over to sound engineers who can now look at the reflection properties of the 3D environment, can look at the acoustical properties of that space would have been in 1622 in London, and actually recreate that sound environment. So then we can go into the visualization lab where I mentioned we have 3D audio capabilities as well as 3D visuals. And what all 3D audio means is the same acoustical environment that we walk around in every day on the street.  So take that into a virtual forestry environment. Now we can change the shape of the room into a hilltop in North Carolina. We can place bird song half a mile away and have those birds migrate around through the trees and you can actually follow them and identify what species of bird song you're listening to. All without leaving that room. So we switch over to Paul's Cross and now you're in the courtyard of St. Paul's Cathedral. You're listening to John Dunn deliver a sermon. You can change the crowd size from 25 to 100 people. You can cue a flock of birds to fly overhead. You can stand in the back of the courtyard next to the apple cart and see what that was like or move right up next to Paul's Cross, the pulpit station itself and listen right in front of them. And finally, this is a last example of some of the academic research applications. On the upper right there, looking at 3D visualization, we have a faculty member who wants to move into that VizLab and use the 3D projection capabilities to look at plant cell component mobility through cell walls, which is apparently an extraordinary, difficult thing to explain, but putting in a visualization environment like that, now we can demonstrate it and skip a lot of that confusion and just difficulty in explaining what the environment is like. The innovation there is we put that visualization into the Unity game environment, so leveraging our gaming component and they can interact with it in a live gaming environment now. So to go back to the example of reusable frameworks, this is the concept for the VizLab. Anybody that has a 3D model or creating a Unity game environment that's tuned to the properties of that room can leverage the sound capabilities and all you have to do is give us your model and we can drop it in there and you magically have an instant visualization interactive environment. On the lower left there, 3D quantification. So not just working with, all visualization is sensory representation of data, so we can gain some new knowledge that we wouldn't have had if we just looked at raw numbers and data itself. So that happens not just in the visual world, but in the oral world as well. So Sina Barum, who was identified as one of the White House champions of change very recently, he is blind and so his research is how do we take data and represent it in a 3D sound environment so that you can experience data through 3D sound and interact with it in a 3D sound space. So you can imagine if you took that plant cell visualization and you were blind, it wouldn't do you any good. But if you could represent that through sound, now you have a very rich interactive environment where you can take that data and gain some new value from it. So finally, just to conclude to tie it all back in, this is how we envision this building as a research platform. It will take us a couple of years just to prove out this concept. It's entirely new. There aren't good models for this anywhere. We are trying to build a new model for what this kind of research platform looks like. At the same time, we are very conscious that there are many important applications of this kind of technology. And we want to acknowledge them all. That is the NCAA tournament. Unfortunately, we were kicked out in the first round.  That's terrible. But wait, that's really cool. So it was a conflicted sort of moment. But that's the Hunt Library and that's the research platform we're creating. Thank you.


10 out of every 100 women in Zanfarah have been diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer according to medical records. Hurya Dal Dal, wife of Zanfarah, state governor emphasized the importance of early detection for timely treatment. She highlighted the need for cessation of women in rural areas to increase the rate of breast cancer patients. The increase in rate of breast cancer cases in Zanfarah is alarming and cause for all efforts to tackle the issue. In this campaign against breast cancer, we emphasize that early detection saves lives as it is the key to timely treatment. Records from our medical personnel indicate alarming situation. From 2019 to recent years, in every 100 women screen, 10 either have breast or cervical cancer. It is against this background I wish to reiterate that that call for all hands to be on deck in changing the narrative about this deadly disease. Also use the current opportunity provided by the ongoing vaccination against cervical cancer to encourage our daughters within the age limit to veil themselves with the opportunity. It is on this note that I kick-start the campaign against breast cancer in Zanfarah state in Sharjah.


I got this thing that somebody told me in this past two years, but it was kind of my remedy anyway didn't know I was living by it. When you can't stay motivated, stay consistent, consistency going to bring back your motivation no matter what it is. You're a basketball player, as rappers, sanitation people, whatever it is you did, that consistency staying on points, staying disciplined, staying focused no matter on the days that's hard. And make the days that you are motivated to have much greater.


Hey Psych2goers, welcome back. So perhaps you're in love with someone, and you're curious as to whether they feel the same way about you. But they haven't quite said those three magic words. What's holding them back? Maybe they haven't yet fallen in love with you, but they appear to like you enough that love could be on the horizon. Well, there are a few psychological secrets that can boost the likelihood of love in your future. What are they, you may ask? Watch to find out. Here are six psychological secrets to make anyone fall deeply in love with you. Number one. Make good eye contact. Hybrid psychologist Zick Rubin conducted a study where he recorded how much time lovers would spend looking into each other's eyes. He found that individuals who are not in love looked at each other 30 to 60% of the time. While those couples deeply in love, they stared into each other's eyes 75% of the time when talking, and when someone else entered the room or interrupted them, they were much slower to turn away from their partner's gaze. A little secret to really getting someone to consider these feelings of love for you, look into their eyes 75% of the time. The brain remembers the last time someone they loved stared at them in the same way. They will associate this stare with feelings of love. Why? This lovely memory causes a release of phenylethylamine, which is known as a love drug. Phenylethylamine is released in the brain when someone falls in love. The chemical too mimics the brain chemistry of someone who is deeply in love. Chocolate contains phenylethylamine, which is probably why it's historically been considered an aphrodisiac. It's also probably the reason we love chocolate so much. Number two. Choose a date location with dim lights. When deciding the location of your next date, it might be a good idea to pick a location with dim lighting. In a significant research study published in the journal Scientific American, researchers showed male subjects two photographs of the same woman. In one of the images, researchers changed the size of her pupils to be faintly larger, while the other images adjusted so that she had smaller pupils. None of the men reported noticing this light change, but the men described the woman with small pupils as cold, hard, and selfish. The woman with larger pupils was described as soft, more feminine, and pretty. Many further studies have had similar results. When it comes to women's preferences on pupil size, studies suggest that they are similar in some ways. Findings appear to suggest that women who are attracted to nice guys are attracted to medium sized pupils, while those who like bad boys are attracted to larger pupils. Well, obviously we can't control the size of our pupils, but dimming the lights will expand them. A romantic candlelight dinner and your partner may feel even more attraction for you, especially if there's chocolate involved. Number three, don't be afraid to smile. When you feel like smiling, don't be afraid to let those pearly whites show. A study published in the Bulletin of Psychonomic Society found smiling might just make you more likeable. According to the study, women in the experiment who smiled 70% of the time were seen as more interpersonally attractive than women who seldom smiled. So while you may think a good ol' lip-pout is the way to go, a smile may be even better. Number four, casually touch them often. In an experiment from the University of Mississippi in Rhodes College, researchers had waitresses briefly touch customers on the hand or shoulders in a controlled yet natural setting. The waitresses who casually touched their customers when returning change received a significantly larger tip than those who did not. Another study published in Psychologically Press, Taylor and Francis Group, had men stand on the corner of a street and attempt to talk to women who would walk by. The men were more successful in starting a conversation with the women when they lightly touched the women on the forearm for one second. As the researchers state, our results showed that a man's courtship solicitations are more favorably accepted by a woman when the request is accompanied by light tactile contact. An intimate touch on the arm here and caress there may just leave your partner even more romantically drawn to you. Number five, have meaningful discussions about yourself and them. Research from Harvard found that deep conversations and meaningfully talking about yourself can help activate the very same regions of your brain. Delicious food or sex activates. The study states that over a 45 minute period, subjects paired carried out self disclosure and relationship building tasks that gradually escalated in intensity. Study one found greater post interaction closeness with these tasks versus comparable small talk tasks. So while small talk is fine every now and then, when you're on a romantic date, a more meaningful discussion may excite them more, you know, more than the weather. When you both open up and reveal your true emotions, your partner may fall in love with the deep engaging conversations you have together instead. And number six, have a good sense of humor. Everybody loves to laugh and a little sense of humor can heighten any relationship. Researchers from Illinois State University and DePaul University found in their study that when you use humor when getting to know an acquaintance at first, that individual has a better chance of liking you more. They even found that engaging in funny tasks may raise romantic attraction. Sounds like a fun date may be the way to go. Cracking a joke under dim candlelight with chocolate? They may just fall in love with you. So do you see love in your future with these habits? Who are you in love with? Share with us your story in the comments down below. If you enjoyed this video, don't forget to click the like button and share it with a friend or someone you like or love. Subscribe to Psych2Go and hit the notification bell icon for more content like this. And as always, thanks for watching.


Yes, Mr. Speaker, they told me that you and Carl wanted to talk to him. Yeah, we got the Wilbur Mills here, the Wilbur Cohen. Well, uh, he's the Wilbur, he wanted to talk with the Wilbur Mills. All right. Wait a bit, Mr. Butler. How are you feeling? Fine. Good to hear from you. We, uh, wound up, and I got instructions. We'll introduce the bill at noon tomorrow and report it at 12.15. Be very brief, be doing so. Uh, I wanted to let Wilbur Cohen, if you would, take a minute and give you his reaction to it. I, I think we've got you something that we won't only run on in 66, but we'll run on from here after. Wonderful. Thanks, Wilbur. Now, here's Wilbur Cohen. When are you going to take it up? We, uh, I've got to go to the rules committee next week. You, you always get your rules pretty quick, don't you? Yeah, that's right. Uh, we could have it on late next week, probably. Thank you. It's not early the following week. Come on, sir, let's get it for Easter. Oh, what they do is, oh, not about that. It's what they do, what they do. And you've got two or three little measures that you might not take too long on, uh, that give us trouble. They make a poll every Easter. They've been doing it 30 years, you know it. And what has accomplished, Congress accomplished up to then? And then the rest of the year, they use that record to write editorials about. So anything that we can grind through before Easter will be twice as important as after Easter. So much obliged, much obliged to you. Things I hope we can do, uh, George Paul and Russ, who are very anxious about this, uh, constitutional call to agreement. Confidence. That is the next. And then immediately following that is this, uh, correction of the, uh, tariff, uh, schedule and reclassification for purposes of this presidential round of negotiations. Sir, do you have a little on, uh, the, uh, the Canadian auto thing? Yes, that bill has not been forwarded to us yet. It hasn't been, uh, up to just today. All right. Well, that would come immediately following that. That's good. That's those little ones. Anything that we can do, and I sure do congratulate you on getting this now because they'll work on the rest of the year and this will be helpful and look like good. Let me talk to Wilbur. All right. I congratulate you and thank you. Let me ask you one more thing. Yeah. Did Jack, well, I didn't talk to you the other day about this damn thing that I asked him to talk to you about.  Yeah, well, yeah. Yes, yeah. That's good. Well, I'll, I'll forgive that. No, no, that's okay. All right. I think it's a great bill, Mr. President. Is that right? Yes, sir. I think you've got not only everything that you wanted, but we've got a lot more than on this thing. It's a real comprehensive bill. What, uh, how much does it cost my budget over what we estimate? Well, I think it, uh, it would be around, I'd say, 450 million more, uh, than what you estimated for the net cost of this supplementary program. Now what do they do under that? How's that handled? Explain that to me. Again, over and above the King Anderson, this supplementary you stole from Burns. Yes. Well, uh, generally speaking, it's physician services. Physicians. Yes. In the arms. All right. Now my doctor, did I go out and eat pump from the stomach? I'd see if I got any ulcers. That physician. That's right. All right. Any, any medical services that, or MD services. Any MD services. All right. Now, how do we know what does he charge what he wants to? No, uh, he can't quite charge what he wants to be, because, uh, this has been put in a separate, uh, separate fund. Yeah. And, uh, what the secretary of HEW would have to do is make some kind of agreement with, uh, somebody like Blue Shield. Yeah. Let's say. And it would be their responsibility under the way the chairman has provided the bill that they would regulate the fees in effect of the doctor. No. Uh, because, uh, what he tried to do is to be sure that the government wasn't regulating the fees directly. That's right. They shouldn't deal with the individual doctor. No. And, uh, the bill provides that the doctor could only charge the reasonable charges, but this intermediary, the Blue Shield, would have to do all the policing so that the government wouldn't have its long hand. All right. And, uh, it would be good for you, the patients, on, on doctors. It says that, uh, you can, uh, have doctor's bills paid up to what extent, or how much, or, uh, any limit? The individual patient has to pay the first $50. All right. deductible. Uh-huh. And then he's got to pay 20%. Of everything after that. Everything after that. So, if you went to the doctor and you had a thousand-dollar bill, you'd pay the first $50. Uh-huh. And for the other $950, you'd have to pay 20% of that. But that keeps your hypochondriacs out. It keeps the hypochondriacs out at the same time. For most of the people, uh, it would provide, uh, overwhelming proportion of their, uh, their physician's cost. Yes, sir. And it's on something that nearly everybody could endure. They could borrow that much, or other folks could get them that much to pay their part. Even if it didn't have any money. Now, what does it get you on hospital and nurses home under the King Anderson? You get the, uh, first 60 days of your hospital care with a $40 deduct. Finally compromised on $40. That's good. And, uh, then in addition, it has the three other benefits that were in your bill, namely the home health services, uh, the outpatient diagnostic. And we fixed that amendment up the way, uh, you remember the, remember the way, uh, the male brothers would talk to you and be about. And then the only one change was for the, uh, home health services. That has to be after you get out of the hospital. That's good. All right. Now, uh, what are the insurance companies? Do they still raise mail? Well, yes. I think they're going to go over to the Senate and raise, uh, hell, uh, on the, uh, thing. Cause quite, uh, quite frankly, uh, there's no longer any room for the private insurance companies to sell insurance policies for people over 65 when you take the combination of hospital care and the, uh, physician service. Yeah. Okay. Now, I think that's wonderful. Now, remember this, nine out of 10 things that I get in trouble on is because they lay around. And tell the speaker and Wilbert to please get a room just the moment they can. They want to get, they want to bring it up next week, Mr. West. Yeah, but you just tell them not to let they lay around. Do that. They won't do, but they might not. Then that gets the doctors organized. Then they get the others organized.  Yeah. It stinks.  The speaker is saying to me, he says he's way ahead of you, Mr. President. He's going to get that on the House calendar next week and get it going so the, the doctors can. Well, congratulations to you. Now, let me talk to Carl if he's there. All right. Thank you. Yes, sir. How's the little John? All right. I think they've told you the whole story. Well, that's mighty good, you. I had a wonderful story. Now, get them, Carl, get them to, to make your, your talk to John, your talk to Owen Smith and make him not let this stuff lay around until they can generate opposition to us. All right. Yes, sir. Just a minute. We'll, we'll start. We'll start in five minutes. Mr. President, don't you worry one minute about these doctors and insurance companies organizing against this bill. Yeah. Now, we have written the insurance people. I must admit completely out of the fear of people over 65. But the AMA is going in all directions. I have even had them just in confidence come to me at the last minute telling me they would accept the payroll tax and we'd use it to finance our program with the state administering it. Well, you couldn't have that. But they've come a long, long way and they're going in all directions. Now, the insurance people are going to oppose it. Just no doubt about that. They were going to oppose HR1. They were going to oppose anything we did. But they've got no more to oppose with respect to what we've got in this bill than they would have thought for anyway without what we've done. The only thing I don't, the only thing I'm concerned about and I'm very frank about it is that there's about $450 million in this bill out of the gentle funds of the Treasury for which you haven't budgeted to your situation. Yeah, but I'll take care of that. I'll do that. You see what I've done? Well, this will not hold for the rest of the year, but the first eight months by constant cabinet pressure, by withholding and just threatening and ultimatum and being meaner than you or Harry Bird, I am under this year, the first eight months, a billion, 800 million under what you appropriated and what I said I'd spend. Now, I think that I'll at least get out of where I'll be, 400, 500 million under that. That's number one. Number two, my deficit in the budget I sent you, January, is a billion dollars under my deficit last year. And I've reduced the deficit, $1 billion. Now, I think that we can, they want to ask me about, they said, you want to put in 400, 500 million. What did I say about it? I said, will you tell them we had no judge in Texas one time? We called him Al Cowley. Oh, Al Cowley, Robert. And he said, when they talked to him one time, I remember a youth constitution, he said, well, what's the constitution between friends? And I say, tell Wilbur that 400 million is not going to separate us friends when it's for health, when it's for sickness, there's a greater demand and I know it. And for this bill and all the other programs put together, I know that it'll last longer. Mr. President, if you would talk to Mr. Ackley and also to Mr. Gordon, they came to see me, and I too was concerned about the impact of the tax beginning. We are worried about that because it takes so much time. I wouldn't minimize the concern that they had initially. They revised our rates more in keeping with their views, and I think they're completely satisfied. What they wanted me to do, most of the spenders said that I was not putting enough money in the economy. And I'd have to put 3-4 billion in to accelerate public works and other things, and I cut down. Now they come along and they say, well, you're taking a lot more out here now, and you're not pumping anything back, you're going to get in trouble.   We've agreed and we've changed the bill. That's good. They're lying to me. I'll get out of statement and congratulate the committee and congratulate you. And for God's sake, don't let the dead cats stand on your porch. Mr. Rabin used to say they stunk, and they stunk, and they stunk.  You know that's the way I practice. I sure do. I know where you learned it. Let me talk to Speaker now. All right, here's the speaker. Thank you, sir. Well, that's mighty good.  And let's get it passed before they get the letters in. And we'll have a damn good record, because that sounds like a better bill, John, than we sent you. Doesn't it to you? It does to me, yeah. I told them $450 million. You know, my philosophy and yours, you and I never argued about $450 million for people over 65, did we? No. I weigh humanity's worth more. Okay, my friend. All right, this friend. John.


Hi I'm Samantha Cox-Para for CalTV Entertainment here at the 10th anniversary of the Outside Lands Music Festival. We've got a lot in store for you so let's go check it out. I think you already said it. I think it's just because well I want to be able to just kind of look down and like have something that is always staring me in the face and like forcing me to you know do my thing.  I made the con get wet man. I should just graduate it so it was pretty hectic but fortunately like the curriculum there is pretty relaxed. Most of my work I could also apply it to like my career as a producer so a lot of the projects were intertwined with school and my career which was nice. It was a great experience I learned like a lot of fundamental techniques and stuff but now that I'm out I'm really trying to hit the ground hard running with songwriting and production out in LA. I say like take a risk because you know there's so many other artists out there like the industry is saturated with people that don't really have that spark so you know like you're always gonna you're gonna fail a lot of times but if you take that risk you're just gonna you're gonna hit like jackpot one day and you're just gonna figure out your style so that's what I would say I'm still trying to kind of like figure out like my whole sound as an artist and everything but definitely just push the boundaries and you know just keep going. Definitely that's some good advice so since you go to Berkeley and we go to Berkeley can we get a go Berkeley on three? All right one two three go Berkeley!


And there is a Royce O'Neill sitting down with us right now. Welcome to Brooklyn Royce, how are you? I'm good, how you doing? Good, good, yeah. Patty says welcome as well. Royce, we first have to ask you, how many times did you watch the Brian Windhorst, what's happening in Utah video? I watched it a lot. And then I was getting tagged in it every day. And actually, I actually did like the pose for it. And it was funny. Me and Donovan have it like inside joke, so. It's great, man. Well, that trade sparked one of the great rants by one of our peers we've ever seen. I wouldn't even call it a rant, more of like an inquisitive monologue. But it also brought you here to Brooklyn Royce. So when you finally have the dust settled after what was a very interesting offseason, and we can get more to that. And you just see this team now, though. That is going to be here. And we know that. What kind of things stand out to you and excite you about this group? I think just how we're all versatile and how like guys communicate and want to play with each other. I mean, since we've been playing like open gyms and stuff like that, talking to guys, seeing how they like playing, where they like having a ball, and just making the game easier for each other. Royce, what's it been like for you? Because you look at your story, and I know Nets fans will get to know it even better. But an incredible journey to get to the point where you were at, and playing overseas, playing the G League, what you did with Utah. Being in the jazz organization and coming to Brooklyn, have an expectation of who you may be playing with, what it would look like. What was it like for you watching some of that uncertainty occurring through the summer, not exactly knowing what the team may look like? Yeah, I mean, every day I was getting questions like, who is going to have on Katie and Kyrie, or the team? I'm just like, I'm just worried about myself. I think all that is going to figure out. But I mean, I think just once everything's settled and got the group he's going to have, it felt good. And then I think the way the guy's coming in, how everybody feels, and I think just what happened last year, just like for myself personally. And then whoever is here, and then wherever everybody came from, I think we all got a chip and want to play. Royce has, what has been kind of the feeling been like of the group? And what are you sensing thus far from the team collectively just in these practice runs, in these early gatherings, as far as that feeling of turning the page and what cohesion this group can get to this season? I think just everybody being on the same page, being really competitive and helping each other out. I think just the way as time goes on, I feel like we're just going to get better at that, seeing how guys interact on the court and play hard. And then I think just us being collective and being on the same page, we're going to go far. What have you enjoyed most about Brooklyn? I know you're originally from Texas, right? And then you were at Baylor, you were at Denver, you were in Utah. Overseas a couple of years as well before Utah. Yeah, everywhere, we're spreading you out. But so you're in New York, you're in Brooklyn. What's the feel been like for you just initially? Yeah, it's been a great feeling. I mean, like every day I just be like, well, I never spent time like in New York like that. And then I think just, you know. Ruko's got all the restaurant recommendations for you. Joe Harris, he's a go-to in that. Yeah, I've given Joe some. So you might be getting me by proxy. Yeah, but I think just, you know, the restaurants, different places to go shopping. I mean, New York is like the mega for it. So I mean, I think just, you know, interacting with the community and seeing what's out there.  We saw when Joe Harris went down, that was a void. Then that's really never we're able to fill. You guys obviously have different games, but when you just look at yourself and your fit on this roster, what stands out to you? Yeah, I mean, you know, being at 3&D, it didn't just, I probably just say the leadership skills that I had, being versatile, trying to like play different positions, you know, not living in myself, but just, you know, sticking to my game and just getting better every day. What about, you know, that's interesting, Royce, because you were on a team with a couple prominent stars, some other really good players as well, but with Rudy and with Donovan, right? And here you're going to have a few big stars.  But use the word leadership. As someone who's now a veteran in this league, who's been around stars, winning teams and knows, okay, this might ultimately be, you know, these guys might be the face of the franchise, but I can still have a role vocally. How do you do that? How do you find those spots and lead, even when you're not the Kevin Durant of a team? I think just being that guy that brings, does a little bit of everything. Try to be relatable to everybody, you know, talk to everybody in a way, you know, that helps them and benefits them and still listening. I think just my situation, being in Utah playing with those guys, I was able to like do the little things and be like the glue guy to like keep everybody together. So I think just bringing that and being myself. With that being said, what stood out to you, the consistency of, with the jazz organization, you guys get into the post season, what you did throughout the course of the regular season, what stood out most that you would like to see transfer over here? And Kevin and Kyrie were very honest in what they talked about and talked about last season, some of the habits and how they were showing up. What do you take from your time with the jazz that you think about as you approach this year? I think just everybody, you know, being bought in. I mean, we don't have our days where, you know, it's gonna be up and down.  I mean, I feel like we got everything and more, you know, to do everything. And I think it's just gonna be us that stops ourselves. Well, Royce, welcome to Brooklyn. We're all excited to have you. Thanks for stopping by and enjoy the restaurant scene this fall here. Appreciate you. All right, that's Royce O'Neill joining us live. Brooklyn Nets Media Day.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com coming at you with 2021 Panini Contenders Football. Six box pick your team number 10. So big thanks to everybody on this list right here for making it happen on a Sunday. Thanks for spending some of your round two March Madness Sunday with me. So Sean ended up with a double last bomb mojo I believe Broncos and Eagles. And then everybody with a rooftop next to your name you'll uh, that means you won that spot in that filler. There you go it's official for Texas Tech they move on 59, 53, Notre Dame is leading a good chunk of the way, and they advance to the sweet 16. Take a look who has Texas Tech. That's Joshua G. That's Texas Tech. So if you click our break schedule and you click the round of 32 tab you'll see where we're keeping track of the, the track of all the tournament movement here. Let me just switch channels really quick. This is in the first half is this closer? This is in the second half to start Miami Auburn. So this is a close one to Miami 10 seed only up by one on Auburn, the two seed. So Auburn, Michael Pomeni has Auburn and then Kevin M has Miami. This one's on true TV. Remember I think Jason marked all of those 10 so we know that these are all from the same uh, same contenders case. I did post another half case break, half case from a fresh case. If you missed out on your teams the first time do not miss out the second time. And it's from a fresh case too. All right box one, number of vet commons don't ship but all the inserts do and obviously the autographs will. Jalen Camp is your first auto and that is for DJ and Houston won that team in the filler. And of course we'll do an autograph recap at the, at the end of the break as well. Here's Kellan Mon, playoff ticket, autograph 19 out of 99. So they got, it's got the weight of year at least. There's Tillon Wallace to 99. That Vikings autograph by the way goes to Anthony, Anthony Luke, that Tillon Wallace will go to Aaron and the Ravens. We got Jeremiah, Ohusu, Koramoa for the Browns. Browns, big news getting winning the Deshaun Watson sweepstakes so that'll be interesting. So now where does, where does Baker Mayfield go? There's Ken McGrone, McGrone going to the Patriots that'll be for Sean Maddock. He's going to be in the second spot man. I'd be amazing if, if that organization somehow convinced him to stay. All right, the redemption is Tommy Trembl, I looked him up the other day, I got him. He is a Carolina Panther. That's Joe with Carolina. Here's your first five. Again, I'll do an autograph recap towards the end and Miami, Tensi taking a little bit of a lead here, 45, 37, still a ton of time left, there's 15, 45 left. Colts you would think, Colts probably want to get, I think the Colts would want to get Baker Mayfield. Well, I'll see who else needs a quarterback, does Seattle, Seattle fans, would you, would you want to take a flyer on Baker Mayfield? I guess the Steelers just got Mitch Shribisky. They'll be, they'll be adding a Baker Mayfield, right? I would be, that'd be kind of, although Baker Mayfield, I wonder if he wants to go to like someplace like Pittsburgh so we can see Cleveland two times a year. He has, maybe he has that chip on his shoulder. Next contenders box, good luck. Should be another five autographs on average. And usually one numbered card, where does Julio Jones go? He's out of 199, maybe he, who knows where he ends up. Maybe some will take a flyer on him. We've got Devine Diablo for the Raiders, playoff ticket autograph, 81 out of 99, he had a solid season last year. An arms race happening in the AFC West, that goes to Jerry, he's got my Raiders. Got rookie ticket autograph, Ernest Brown, the fourth, before the Rams, Kurt on the Rams. By the way, these round numbered cards right here, we're going to do left-right randomizers on those. And if there's any points, it's winner take all on the points. Ooh, nice. For the Fly Eagles Fly, 13 out of 49 legendary contenders, Randall Cunningham. Sean Maddock with the Eagles, it's one of his last spot mojo teams. And it's nice, old school guys have good penmanship too. And we've got Aaron Jones, cracked ice autograph, 20 out of 22 veteran ticket, cracked ice on-card auto, good penmanship here as well. Who's got Green Bay, Petrie, with the Packers. And we've got Kine and Wangu, rookie ticket autograph for Minnesota Anthony with the Vikings. Justin St. Chris Ballard Frank Reich must love Sam Allinger. They seem content with him. Yeah, so they're not in on a quarterback, huh? But maybe they didn't, maybe that was before they realized that Baker Mayfield could be available, should it is available? Seattle want to make a move? Seattle's not getting any younger, or Pete Carroll. Seattle head coach is not getting any younger.  Are they happy with? They're happy with the Denver Jewelock. They're happy with the former Denver Corvette. Half here. Trying to look at some, go on to profootballrumors.com from the makers of MLB Trade Rumors.com. They do a pretty good job quickly aggregating and posting a lot of confirmed information. Corey Littleton, signing with the Panthers on a little one-year deal. She's re-signing Derek Naughty, Charger signing Gerald Everett, some other little moves here and there. Yeah, Banglesign Lyle Collins, that was a big move. I mean, they've done a lot to reshape their offensive line, which has been a big problem. So they're definitely taking care of that. I wouldn't be surprised if they get an offensive lineman in the draft, too. Some youngsters can marinate behind some of those guys. We've got Sam Garnold to 199. We've got Pete Warner for the Saints, first autograph of the box. Got rookie ticket autograph Eric Stokes. That goes to Green Babe, Treat. Another packer, Killin' Hill. Rookie ticket autograph. And we've got Micah Parsons, rookie ticket autograph for Dallas. He had a really nice season. That goes to Craig and the boys. Is James Winston going back to New Orleans? That makes sense. They're already familiar with him and his knee issue. I don't see that being confirmed yet, but yeah, that would make sense for him to go back there. There's Pat Friarmyth. That is for Sean Maddock and the Steelers, one that team in the filler. All right, another set of autographs in the books. Box halfway through this half case break. What does Atlanta do with Matt Ryan? I mean, if Matt Ryan knows that they were actively pursuing Deshaun Watson, is Matt Ryan, I feel like he's been around the league long enough where he knows it's a business, right? I feel like Baker may feel still on the younger side. He maybe takes it a little more personally. Is Matt Ryan just a pro? And he's just like, yeah. If I was in the front office, I'd do the same thing, say something like that. Let's go back to continues playing. Or yeah, or do they end up moving Matt Ryan? Matt Ryan and Indy, that could be pretty nice. Veteran quarterback, solid team, great defense, good coaching. Definitely an upgrade. Matt Ryan is definitely an upgrade over Carson Wentz. The Colts were just right on the doorstep over the playoffs last year, but just fell a few games. Just couldn't take care of business in the last few weeks. I'm sure Matt Ryan would have made a difference there. All right, next box, that Braven Jordan for the Texans. That's going to go to DJ, won that spot in the filler. We got Sean Wade, rookie ticket autograph for the Pats. Unmatic with the Patriots. And a redemption, it's Panay Sule, big offensive lineman for the Detroit Lions, even flat. And for the Seahawks, rookie ticket on-card autographed Wayne Eskridge. That's Matthew with the Seahawks, won that team in the filler. And Antonio Gibson to $199. We only get four, was that Pat Fireman for the fifth? We'll catch you with the on average sometimes. Oh, yeah. You think San Francisco? Justin's thinking San Francisco could be a good fit for Matt Ryan, unless they're content with Trey Lance. There's some familiarity there with the quarterback. Is that why he's saying India's nobody? We were kind of discussing, does Matt Ryan get traded? If he does, where would he work? Indianapolis could be a spot for Matt Ryan. He would be an upgrade over Carson Wentz and whoever else they have, Sam Allinger. There's some weapons there and good defense and winnable division. There was an upside down card. Did I miss an auto? Not a second. Let me go look for that. There it is. Cameron Bynum, good iPad. That's the Vikings. That's going to go to Anthony, our shipping team would have found it. But there you go. We found it now. All right. Onwards. Greg Rousseau, rookie ticket autograph for the Bills. Buffalo! Mike Fagan with the Bills. And we got Dylan Stoner, rookie ticket autograph for the Raiders. It's for Jerry and the Raiders. We got points here. They'll be randomized as one lot to one person in the break. That does take the place of an auto. Yeah, sub Allen. Allen needs more commanders here. More Washington commanders. Rookie ticket autograph, Brandon Stevens for the Purplebird. That's going to go to Aaron and the Ravens. We've got Miami up 60 to 47 on Auburn. It's 10 seed Miami leading two seed Auburn by like, what, 11 points? But nine minutes left though. Still a lot of time. We got Rondale Moore, rookie ticket autograph. That is for Stephen Flap. If you're Rondale Moore, gets a little more love this season. Without Christian Kirk. And we got Jerome Bettis, power player's insert. 71 out of 99. Pittsburgh, Sean. All right, final box. Good luck to 99. Patriots, that'll be for Sean. And we've got rookie ticket autograph, Hamza Nasser Leiden. Going to Petreet and the JTS Jets Jets Jets. For the Pat Riots, rookie ticket autograph, Christian Barmore. Sean Maddock. Got the Patriots straight up in this break. And we got Larry Roundtree, the third. Rookie ticket autograph for Craig and the Bolts. AFC West is going to be crazy this year. Should be a lot of fun. We got a rookie of the year contenders autograph on card. 8 out of 49, Rashad Bateman. For Aaron Billingsley. I feel like he was injured for a good chunk of the season. Then showed some moments. And then maybe injured again, something like that. But could be an interesting piece for the Ravens and Aaron. And our fifth autograph and final one. It's Cracked Ice Eagle Collins. 10 out of 21. That's going to be for DJ. We got the Texans in the filler.  That is the break unless we have a bonus auto. No bonus auto, no numbered card. That is that. Pick your team 10 in the books. Let's do some quick randomizing. And then we'll do an autograph recap. So let's flip back to random.org. New dice. First list will be the left-right randomizer for the round numbers cards. And then the other one. Get everybody's names here. The consolation prize, 400 points. Or a cherry on top if you've been hitting in this break. Let's roll it randomizer 3 out of 5. 8 times. For both lists. Good luck. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. And once more right? Yeah, once more 8th and final time. Left side. So all the left side teams here. We'll get those round numbers cards. And for the points, 8 times. Name on top after 8. We'll get it 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th and final time. After 8. Name on top after 8 is going to be... Close Joe. No cigar though, but it'll be for Stephen Flatt. There you go Stephen. After 8 times. I did it right. Yeah, after 8 times. Your name's on top. 400 points going your way. Greek hat. From the 6th box to the 1st. Panay Sul. Pat Friarmyth. Got the nice Aaron Jones veteran ticket cracked ice and the Randall Cunningham. That my friends is that. Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with that. I was contenders football. Pick your team number 10, 2021 edition. I'm Joe for Jaspy's casebreak.com and I'll do some more football with you next time. Bye bye.