Tidak, tidak penting. Jadi jika nama adalah bin, P-P-I-N, P-P, atau apa-apa pun, sejauh-jauh, sejauh-jauh ini adalah kombinasi dari teks dan pasal, atau sejujurnya, pasal hanya akan lakukan, kemudian browser akan cuba mempercayai. Ya. Jadi, seperti, peringatan yang tersebut tidak mempercayai pasal untuk menjadi selamat, kan? Sejujurnya sudah selamat. Dan kemudian sekarang anda mahu menghentikan. Untuk mempercayai. Kemudian ini adalah keputusan untuk mengambil keadaan itu. Jadi, kita mengambil kedua-duanya. Dan saya akan tunjukkan kepada anda yang adalah hidup. Saya tidak mempercayai. Ya. Chrome tidak mempercayai. Saya ingat sebuah browser tidak mempercayai. Mari kita lihat. Tersenang-senang. Ada sesuatu yang digunakan? Hei! Kenapa tidak mempercayai? Baik lagi. Saya tidak tahu kenapa. Jadi, anda mempercayai sebuah peringatan yang digunakan untuk mempercayai sebelum keadaan yang sebenar, kan? Ya. Jadi, ya. Anda mengambil kedua-duanya keadaan dan keadaan. Jadi, kami akan mempercayai kedua-duanya. Bagaimana dengan Safari? Ia tidak mempercayai sekarang. Bagaimana? Ia mempercayai server anda? Ia... Ia mempercayai. Tidak. Ia adalah sebuah peringatan yang digunakan. Jadi, saya dapat menunjukkan perjalanan anda. Itu sebuah peringatan. Ia bukan peringatan kita. Ia hanya sebuah peringatan Python Http. Baiklah. Saya akan mempercayai. Bagaimana dengan untuk mempercayai sebuah peringatan? Hei? Ia mempercayai. Ia mempercayai sebuah peringatan. Ia mempercayai. Itu sesuatu yang terlalu menarik. Bagaimana denganite?μαι percayai sekarang! Ia mempercayai. Saya akan mempercayai. Bagaimana dengan untuk mempercayai? Ia mempercayai pengisi jaringan. Ia mempercayai. Ya, so this one is a trick. Is that a standard framework? Apparently this only works for Chrome. I think if you use this, then Safari will try to fill in. I can't remember but only Chrome recognize it. New password? Ya. Okay, so what about the other browser? The other browser doesn't. Okay. Okay, so now we fix the problem. Okay, this is me with browser. Okay, so we just confuse the browser already. But then you can see this, right? Okay, so like all this. It's a no-no. Ya, everybody wants to say the problem. Also you don't want to even trigger the pop-up. Ya. Is that even possible? Well, possible. Tolong jelaskan juga. Mungkin anda boleh menghubungi pop-up. Okay, so usually this kind of case, we will talk to the boss, right? It's not a problem, right? It's not auto-filling. People are not getting their password auto-filling. No. Okay, doesn't need me to help you Google. I'm just like going to go through my day more. So the first solution was suggesting that let me focus back on the first solution. So it says that you should set read-only to your field to confuse browser again. Then when you focus, then you remove it. How do you have a focus event in something that's free? We only can be focused. So that the screen reader when they tap through, then it will still read it out. Okay, this is what? Kind of. Are you resetting the read-only upload? No, doesn't need to. I tried resetting it, it's the same. Same issue. So on focus, this is the remove attribute. Read-only. Do you need to cap the case O? No. Is this your JavaScript? No, it's HTML. It doesn't matter. Trust the man that works in the back. He trust to pay. Local host. This is recorded. There's no password. It's just this. Testing, testing. Okay, it doesn't work for Chrome. It's showing this. I think I haven't finished the solution. You have to do things like... The type has to be button. So it's not going to submit a form? On click. Technically you are not going to submit a form. You have to use Ajax to submit. Oh no. If you put a button in a form, it will submit a form by default. It becomes a submit. So browser would detect that a form is submitted. Then it would try to save. So we have to do... Let's say you are going to do it with Ajax. I'm just going to redirect. Next.html. Like this. Then you will work. This solution is not going to work for Chrome. Just like this is showing. It would try to remember whenever you type something. So before you submit it, it's going to do something? So... So it's not prompting. Then Safari would still be trying to save. So the first solution doesn't work. Then let's try this. So essentially it's saying that you should set your password feel to be text. And then mask it with the disk. So... I think just do this. I need to do like copy paste. Installed. So the type has to be text. Ya. Data. Equal to password. For styling. Not finished, not finished. We need a render specific check. Ya. But what to do? Because it comes in as a regulation consideration. So you need this. Else Firefox will not work. Firefox will be showing your password in plain test. Oh. So you need to do this. So in plain test. Ya. There are solutions around it as well. People say that you track whatever people is typing in in memory instead of flipping. But then you have to track where is the cursor. When they delete. It's too troublesome for me. There will be even more tedious. But you create a box with key press events and write key press events. How do you track the cursor? Key press events. Ya, see you track. No, say somebody click outside and click in again. Ya. Where is your cursor? I'm just trying to think how you could possibly pass what you could do. It will be like a few thousand lines of code trying to do this kind of. The man works in a pen. He's already thought about this. Okay, let's try in Chrome and see whether it's still sharing that. Key. Oh, it's not. So we managed to track Chrome. Just try that it's sharing the digs. But apparently Safari still have the problem. So what I suspect about Safari is that the moment that you put anything into something that looks at password field I think even if you set it to content-additable then you style it with the digs, it will think that you're typing a password. And the moment that you redirect from one page to the other then it will pop. So I still haven't got a solution for Safari. There are some banks that locally they managed to get around this because they are signing page redirect to the same page. So if you post it to the same page then it's not going to prompt. And then the whole page is the whole PENGING website is iFrame. So there's no redirection and that's how they managed to get around it. Do you have to test with password managers like one password or the last password? I do have the last password installed. I think what they are looking at is as long as you type something in the password field then they will prompt. Because they don't have the luxury to access the underlying interfaces. So you don't think they managed to know about such things? No. Is this solution for you Jawa Secret Manager? Like I said, how do you track the cursor? It's not about tricking cursor. It's more like I think if I do it right now I'll probably do something like that. When the user inputs you actually not submitting the data protein. You actually will make the words so I'll convert in the password form. And then when you submit that it doesn't work. It doesn't work. But still you have an input password unless the whole thing is like fake. IE 9 Why? Because sometimes IE doesn't really recognize the attributes. Okey. We only need to support IE 11. We can just style the attribute. So I thank you. So now we just submit your solution to the old browser as a bug. No. There's already a bug there and there's even a W3C discussion that they decided to ignore the auto-complete-off thing. Like I said just now it's more serious than typing out password in the public than in the auto field. They think the user doesn't know how to make the choice. So this is the thing that auto field was brought in for the good reason of letting you auto-fill things. And you can turn it off if it was a password. So turning a new password you've got the horrible pattern where you set a password once and twice. Maybe you don't want to remember that one because that's just setting a password that's not actually entering it. So the reason that auto-fill was brought in was for that particular service. To separate feature, auto-fill is for form auto-filling. Then this password saving is another feature. But it was all to do with password-saving. The reason auto-fill was meant to contain an earlier build of even Metscape I think you had to use a profile and you could put your name and address and try to find stuff on the field and fill it out for you. So far it does this pretty well and it runs for quite well. So that's the goal of the browsers. And the idea of the auto-fill is that this particular field don't prompt me for my name just because it says name. So you might be filling something where it doesn't want your name but just wants a name. That's when you want to turn on a fill-off. So that's the intent behind the spec. But because it's been so badly abused by fakes that basically said and for security's sake letting people not have to remember passwords and type them out. But they are like finding people keep repeating their passwords. So one of the good thing about password manager is that even for Safari and I don't know about Chrome they will give you the option to generate a new password when you sign up for something. Then that is how you increase the security of your accounts. You are using a different password. So it's less likely that people can steal your password because you don't even know your password. But this is exactly what the browser is fighting against what you're trying to do so they can have proper password with security. Why banks insist on bad security? I don't know. It's a regulation. Congratulation, proven by bad security. Okay. It's a conclusion. Is this where you renounce about it or something? But the conclusion is that all these are catching out game, right? You can't really always win the browser because you are just like one person whereas for the browser vendors their whole team to study, they even control how browser works. Okay. The methods that I show today might not even... Maybe tomorrow they will patch it. Question on that. I'm sure this argument is being made but the people pushing for this surely they realise they are going to be losing sign. No. They could be people who are not tax heavy. They just know about business requirements.  Do you want to make it hard to try and defeat last pass as well? Yeah, that's what I was asking about password managers because they are really good at circumventing stuff like this. DBS prevents one password working because it disabled other things. Actually, the worst thing when banks launch in your frame and you don't have your browser Chrome so you can't invoke anything release. I think last pass work pretty well for me like it will always show the icon there. Yeah. I think last pass if you're in a journal you can save it as well. So I should be using last pass instead of one password. Too late. Thank you. I have no idea how to fix it.


Diamond Johnson. Number to 75. Yellow color match. Caitlin Clark.  Huge congrats. Blue to 150. Kylan Boswell. Red is Kylan Boswell. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Back to back. Little red and blue. And they're both color matches. That's kind of neat. Behind that, we've got to 10. Jared McCain. Greatness of weights auto. That'll work. That's a good one. Zade and a high on the Teal Geometric to 15. Autograph.


So I just went and got a six-pack of beer. It's ours! So now it's in the driveway, as you can see on the inside. It's done a huge trailer, it's 25 foot. Got a little sofa over there, a little dinette. There's the kitchen area here with the refrigerator. You just saw me loading it up. So what we're going through to try to get this thing up and running to where we can actually use it and what that's going to all that's involved. Stick around. Successories. Excuse the background noise. I got the air conditioner going. I'm lucky enough to have a 30 amp circuit that I can plug this bad boy in. It's almost like 85 degrees outside so it's hot. Those and we went and bought three or four of them. Brought them in and figured out what I'm looking for in a camper. You know? On the parts and the stuff that you're going to put in it. You want to try to keep it as light as possible. If you're like me, you're just starting out. Your vehicle's not really rated to carry a whole lot of weight. I've got a half ton Ford pickup truck that I think 75-8,000 total weight. And a travel trail is coming in at 4,300 and something pounds. So you know, we're staying under that weight limit but when you start adding all this, the weight starts to add up.  Here's a prime example but it's plastic.  You get metal fork, spoons, knives, all the other cooking utensils that you're going to use the big spoons for cooking in pots and stuff like that. That stuff's going to add weight to your trailer. So we are trying desperately to keep the weight down but buying functional items that we can use. So I'm going to put this up right now. So I decided I'm going to put this bad boy right here next to the sink. That way I could put it up here by this light but by the time you put your paper towel on it you're blocking this window that we've got right here. I don't want to block that view. We're going out to to see the sights not to block them. So this is some of the stuff you need to be looking at when you first get a travel trailer. So anyway that bad boy is going to park right there. Don't be scared I guess it's the key words here. I'm going to have to drill screws into this cabinet that I really don't want to do but how else you're going to mount things. You can use command hooks and command tape and all that but I'm going to have down pressure on this with this paper towel roll. I mean it's not heavy but I don't want it falling off because then I'm going to have to be right back in the boat going ahead and putting screws in it. So I made the decision go ahead and screw it in. And one thing you got to take into account with this is that that little bracket wherever it went this has got to slide out. So that's going to be a challenge I think I need to figure out how to do that. This is the problems you run into that this is going to slide hitting back there. I could put a screw in just tighten it a little bit but I'm still not going to be able to do it. Can't do it that way because the towel has got to come on this way. So look at those things. It's always something that's not going to work. Well the wife and I bought this trailer so I'm not going to put that towel bar just where I think it's going to go. That's going to have to be her decision as well. You know happy wife happy wife. So what do you think Mr. Risa? Thank you. Coming along. Yeah we're getting there. We're getting there. So anyway I went ahead and another window so that you could get the roll of paper towel on and off that otherwise it almost doesn't work there. Here on the bathroom door we had some command tape. I don't know if you can see it back there. There's some white in there but that came off. So we ended up having made sheetrock screws in there. What are you going to do?  I don't know about fingernail polish but something. Yeah paint. In the bathroom decorated. Got a little trash can. It's not much room in there. That's just one of the pitfalls you're going to have when you buy a new trailer. Trying to find places to put this stuff. But I think the mirror is really neat on the door. As you can see we're getting there. I got all my tools sitting around in here trying to get stuff done. You know put that towel rack up. Don't really like that so we're going to change it. We're going to get one of the old-fashioned kind that way we can put it in sideways and be done with it. I'm not happy with it being in front of that window. We're not going to get us a nice little rug. Add some color in here. As you can see this camper's it's got a really nice color. Gotta add some more. Well stay tuned guys. We're going to have lots more for you. Till the next time take care of yourself and others too.


Hello, everybody, and thank you for joining us today, and thank you to our distinguished panelists. Now, all of you in the audience should have their names and bios clearly on your screens, but just in case, I'm going to quickly introduce them. We have Sharon Borough, General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation, Nadia Canvino, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation of Spain, Jonas Priesen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Manpower Group, Nikola Schmidt, European Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, Spain Torre Jolceter, President and Chief Executive Officer of YARA International. Now, today, we are going to be talking about solutions. To the great inequality caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, it's clear after more than two years of the world with COVID-19 that this was a pandemic of inequality, that the haves and the have-nots have been affected very differently by the pandemic. And this is true in global sort of cosmic terms, if you will, so across different geographies where you happen to live, but also at the local and individual level. And this is true in terms of the suffering from the disease, in terms of being affected by the policies introduced because of the virus and from the overall economic toll. COVID created inequalities, but also exacerbated existing ones. And of course, we are seeing the consequences of this growing disparity, not only in economic terms, but also in political ones. So today, we are here to talk about what happens next, how we emerge from the crisis, what policies are needed, what partnerships, what compact is needed across all areas of economy and society. Very quickly, for all of you in the audience, a note of housekeeping. You can all ask questions by using Slido. You scan the QR code on the screen, select the session, post your queries. Now, to the panelists, I'd like to jump right in. And I'd like to warm us up, because this is quite a heavy topic. I'd like to warm us up with a lightning round question for all of you, really just a 30-second, after a five-second answer even. And that question is, how long do each of you think that the scars of this pandemic will be with us? Are we talking months, years, decades, a century? I would like your quick prognosis. So let's begin, on the screen, it's Harvard Minister Kandino. Let's begin with you, and then we'll do a quick round. OK, well, thank you very much. Indeed, I'm happy to kickstart, to put the ball in the playing ground. And I think that the impact is going to be extremely different depending on the circumstances of the countries. You already flagged that there's been a very unequal response. I think that in developed countries, we have focused a lot in avoiding inequalities. We've focused a lot in protecting citizens, protecting companies and jobs. Also, we've had access to the vaccines. And that, I think, is leading to a very limited scarring. In the case of Spain, for example, job numbers have recovered in around 15 months, as compared to 12 years after the past financial crisis. But, of course, the impact may be very different in most vulnerable countries. So we really have to get the recovery right to make sure that the potential structural impact is as small as possible, as little as possible throughout the world. And I think this will depend greatly on vaccination and the availability and access to vaccines, and also on financial stability, probably two of the issues we should be focusing on in the coming weeks and months. Absolutely. Mr. Commissioner Schmidt. Well, I fully agree with what Nadia has said. The scars depend a lot on our solutions. As in Europe now, we have been able to mobilize a lot of energy, a lot of measures, including also the recovery and resilience plan. The scars are already disappearing, depending also on the vaccination and on the evolution of the pandemic. But I think what will remain, and I would even say what should remain with us, is the awareness of our fragility. And I think this is something we have to work on. We have been taken by surprise with this pandemic, although some announced this kind of big pandemic. And we have now to prepare for the next pandemic, or for events we are not sure, but which may occur. And this is for the next coming years. We have to work on this fragility in our societies, and we have to build up solutions to cope with that. Great. So years for sure. Both of you are indicating years, but obviously with difference, it depends where you began with, which is clearly a very good point. Secretary Burrow. Well, it'll take at least a decade, and that's only then if the solutions that generate a new social contract are in place, and it's inclusive of everybody. Because the pandemic has shown that if one person is at risk through unvaccination or unjust development or lack of social protection for resilience, we're all at risk. So we need a new social contract, and it needs to be inclusive. And it needs to recognise that the inequality and indeed the integration of crisis with climate started before the pandemic. This has simply laid out a much deeper crater. And the big challenge is indeed to rebuild trust, because what's at risk here is the very democracies and the trust in democracies that can put in place that social contract. Yeah, you raised the word trust, which is clearly a very, very important one, which I'm sure that that we will come back to. Mr. Prizing. I would probably characterize it as a little bit more optimistic. I think the scarring that you describe from the pandemic is, in my view, more a question of highlighting pre-existing, pre-pandemic differences between the haves and the haves nots that have now been exacerbated, and some of the structural changes to labour markets have been accelerated. And I think what it's highlighted is that while we're all in the same ocean, we are clearly all not in the same boat. So I'm more optimistic on the short term rebound once we get to post-pandemic on the immediate pandemic-related labour market impact. And we've seen it already in terms of unemployment bouncing back very quickly on the impact on people's earnings actually being reasonably limited and wage inflation being very strong. So I think the labour markets have navigated this well individuals within the context of the pandemic have navigated it well, but it highlights the need to address the deep rooted inequalities in the labour market that's otherwise just as Sharon said, is going to impact us and our societies and workers in a way that is very, very unequal. And you raise an important point, which of course is another aggravator here, which of course is inflation, which is also the result of pandemic supply chain issues, also others, but in addition, pandemic-related issues. So that's another point that that we interesting to go to go back to. Mr. Holtzeter. Well, it's really impossible to answer, but I still believe it's still within our power to influence the length of how long it will take for this. But I have good examples of strong response to this. And we also have some really negative examples. And I believe the distribution of vaccines and access to vaccines, it's shameful. And many have been left out. And that goes straight to the topic that Sharon raised on trust, how we're going to rebuild trust after this. So that will be, we keep it also there are some learnings here that are very relevant in other prices that were faced with like the climate crisis that, you know, when we're faced with a common threat, how we're able to get together, how we for this time listened to science and science was able to come up with solutions. That's something that is very relevant also in the climate crisis. So there are some positive learnings that we can bring with us as well. Yes. And you know, your point about science is actually very related to trust. I mean, we see it in the media business on in my industry that there's been actually increased trust in the media business because we have been talking to scientists who have been who have been giving us numbers and who have been giving us facts. And that actually the population is more in tune with that, if you will. Okay. Thank you for setting the scene here. Let's turn.  Commissioner Schmidt, so as we said, there have been a slew of measures, you know, to help populations, particularly, you know, workers and employers during lockdowns. But clearly, there are limitations, national budgets are limitations. And also a pandemic that is still, you know, very uncertain. So what needs to be done next? And in particular, picking up on what Secretary Baro does, what does this compact need to look like from the policymakers side? Well, I think that the pandemic has revealed a lot of issues and exasperated issues, which we should have already been prepared to work on and to solve. And I think this is the big lesson out of this pandemic. It's about resilience. It's about trust. It's about the broken social contract we had. I think we are talking now about building and developing a new social contract. This means in a way that before the pandemic, this social contract was probably even broken, at least put into question. And I think these are the lessons we should learn out of the pandemic now. First, that some approaches we thought that could not be changed had to be changed very rapidly. That was the economic response to the economic impact of the pandemic. If we had followed the orthodoxy, we would be nowhere. So I think this is an important thing we have to build on. The second one is, well, society exists. You remember this famous phrase of Margaret Thatcher that there is no such thing as society. We have discovered that society exists, and we needed society. And we have to rebuild our societies. We have to rebuild solidarity in our societies. And part of the pandemic, we are in a tremendous moment of change, because the pandemic has not changed or diminished the impact of climate change. I think this is at least or even a bigger challenge for our societies, for our economies, for the world of work. And we have really to continue and even amplify our measures in relation to climate change. Technology is there. Technology has helped us a lot in this pandemic, because our economies would have run even worse if we had not a very rapid adaption to technological means. But finally remains the division in our societies inequalities. They were before the pandemic. They have been exasperated after. And I think that's the issue about the new social contract. We have to bring in new policies, new ways how to see social, how to see social investment, how to invest in people, how to reduce these inequalities in our societies. That's the big challenge. In order to cope with the climate change, technological, demographic transformations. And I think here the pandemic can help us, can be an accelerator, but it can also, if we do not draw the right solutions, it can also worsen the situation. But that would then be a problem of trust, of democratic rights, of the cohesion of our societies. But so your points are well taken, but let's speak, let's give a few specifics here.  But he talked about solidarity. We have not always seen solidarity. Often we've seen brinkmanship, in fact. And so, okay, so what impact is what are the instruments then that now, as we, I don't, I cannot say we are emerging because we are still in it. But if we look at a time where we emerge from the health crisis, what are the instruments? What are the initiatives that need to remain? Well, actually, I think that as I said in my introductory remark, I think that to some extent we learned the lessons from the past financial crisis. And at least in so far as developed countries, most developed countries are concerned. And in particular, that's the case with the EU, as Nicolás Commissioner and Nicolás Schmitz was highlighting. I think the response to this crisis has been totally different from the last financial crisis. There has been, first of all, a coordinated response on the health front. And that has been instrumental for the development of the vaccines, but also to guarantee that all Europeans have access to those vaccines. But also on the economic and social front, well, we have all deployed an unprecedented massive program of public guarantees, support to short-term work schemes, a social protection network for the most vulnerable part of our societies. So we have focused very much on citizens, on this society that Nicolás was saying maybe 15 years ago, people were suggesting did not exist. And we have also, I think, become increasingly aware that the public sector and public services are absolutely essential, that there is a social infrastructure that we need to protect if we want to ensure long-term resilience, health sector, education. We have become aware of our vulnerabilities, but also where we need to put our money and our investment and our focus going forward. So I would say that the response has been very different, both from a short-term perspective, short-term reaction to provide financial stability, vaccines, et cetera. But also from the mid to long-run perspective, because we have put in place this massive investment program, investment and structural reform program. For the first time in the EU, we are borrowing together in order to invest together in our common future. And therefore there is a focus on long-term sustainability from the economic and financial point of view, but also from the social and environmental point of view, which is new. And I would close this reflection by saying, and this is building a new global orthodoxy to a certain extent. So all financial institutions, international financial institutions, multilateral fora, the Davos Forum and public-private partnership and dialogue, and the academia, everybody is now realizing that reducing inequalities should be one of the top priorities of sustainable growth in the mid to long-run. And so the two go together, growth and equality or fairness. And we need a fair recovery if we want it to be sustainable throughout time. Let me quickly, but just for a nanosecond, press you. You said it is clear where we need to put our money. Clarify that for us then. Well, for example, just to give you the example of the Spanish recovery plan, we're going to devote around 40 percent of investments to the green transformation agenda, 30 percent of investments to the digital transformation agenda, around 10 percent of investments, education, vocational training, digital skills for the whole of the population. There's also a very strong focus on developing new social infrastructures. So our whole recovery plan, not to speak about the structural reforms, we can maybe come back to this in a second round, labor market, pensions and other important structural reforms. But in terms of investments, I think we're really putting our money where our mouth is and focusing on future proof investments in order to foresee or to ensure that there is a strong recovery, but also a fair recovery thinking about future generations. Got it. And also you raised that essentially the global social contract needs to include an environmental dimension to it. Perhaps we'll come back to that. Let me move to the role of business leaders then, in setting this agenda for the new social contract for creating a fairer workplace. Mr. Holzer, what is the role here in detail and in what can actually be done? I think it's an important and clear premise that business will not thrive in a society that is not thriving. And this means that we from the business side need to think much broader than just focusing on our own individual P&Ls or balance sheet. We need to move from the traditional shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism. And this, I think, is both needed and expected. I just saw this morning in the annual Edelman Trust parameter that was published. And we see that business is the most trusted institution and that the respondents were very clear that they expect businesses to play a larger role whether it's on on climate change, on economic inequality, racial injustice and workforce risk killing. So the expectation is there. And here I believe it's the strength of the purpose driven companies that all companies should ask themselves, what is the purpose of their existence? And if that answer is just to make money, I think we need to rethink that. Why do they exist in the first place? It is about playing a role in society, about creating jobs, about creating solutions. And as the Edelman survey concludes with, societal leadership is now a core function of business. So I think this is changing a lot now. So just to follow up quickly on what you just said, you seem to be the optimist here in this group. And you pointed out that during the pandemic that actually institutions, businesses and businesses you pointed by the way that they acted have increased trust. And yet, when we look at what's happening in the world around us, there are things to be concerned about at the geopolitical level, but also what we're seeing on the streets, people are taking to the streets. There is questions even about democracy. So how do you see, it seems to me that trust does need to be the bedrock of this new social contract, but how do you see that playing out just very quickly as a follow-up to this? And then we'll go to Secretary Barrow. The reason I am optimistic is that I've seen it in practice now in the pandemic with a company that has a very clear purpose where the organization understands what is it that we contribute within society and the need for doing that locally. We have to take some very tough decisions that in this situation we're not going to be able to sort of remote control a global business. We have to delegate the ownership of that, empower people and have the combination of empowerment and a very clear purpose. We see what our organization is able to do in the societies where we operate. And at the end of the day, trust is built on what we're doing in practice and we see what we're in the ag industry, what we can do for helping farmers to produce more food to combat hunger and so on. It's examples like this, I think, that are needed. And that's what makes me optimistic on what we can do. Great. Sorry, I said I was going to Secretary Barrow. I'm saving you for the end, Secretary Barrow. I want to go to Mr. Preising. You're at the forefront of this, obviously, through your company. How much of all of this is realistic and how much of it instead is or how much does it have to be hand in hand with rescaling a population that needs to emerge from the old ways of working and needs to find new ways of approaching the labor market? What is needed from your point of view? Because then I want to draw us in the second round to real solutions in the specific. I think one of the big and maybe one of the few positives of the pandemic is that it's given us a glimpse into the future of what could happen if we don't address some of the structural changes that are occurring in labor markets. And both the Deputy Prime Minister Sventora talked earlier about climate change. And what we've seen over 40 years looking at data is that climate change is real and it's happening. It took us 40 years to get to the tipping point, arguably, of the pandemic. And the Deputy Prime Minister, along with many other policy makers and the EU, have plowed in and are allocating significant resources with a full realization that we need to avert a planetary disaster with climate warming. We believe that what we've seen during the pandemic is what could happen in terms of the acceleration of inequality and that we need to take action now because we actually have the data. We know that the impact of technology means different skills are needed and we need to move from different industries and occupations at an accelerated pace. We know individuals have new expectations and preferences, which frankly have been fast forwarded significantly during the pandemic, leveraging and realizing that companies and organizations need to stand for more than profits and a job and also align with their own ambitions around purpose and sustainability. And we also know that demographically during the pandemic, most birth rates crashed. And it's an acceleration of a trend that's been going on for 30 years. So our call to action is really to think about the S in the ESG in the same vein as you think about climate change, but instead of waiting for these gaps to become so painfully obvious that we're forced to take action, we can anticipate this. And we understand, just as Sven Torres said, as enterprises, we understand we cannot thrive if the societies in which we operate aren't thriving. And inequality is bad for business. So businesses and organizations are aligning with that understanding. And that's why you see the emergence and the strong belief in stakeholder capitalism, because we will allocate resources in a way that makes us more successful, including the broader stakeholder view. So we ensure that we can continue to thrive as businesses. So Secretary Burrow, bring us here. The reason I came to you last is I want you as a reality check here. And so to say, okay, this is all great. This all sounds great. But from your vantage point, I have two questions. What does it look like in pragmatic terms? What does it look like to have this new contract, to have these partnerships? Who can disagree about multi-stakeholders? But what does that look like in practice? First question. Second question, what about your organization and organizations like yours? Do they have the structural adequacy to be at the forefront and to push the new labor of the future? So the first thing is that Sven and Jonas are right about the need for business to reform, to have a mandate that's much faster than simply making money. Because what we have now is simply a total disconnect between Labor income share, which has a 30-year slump between the fact that only some 40-odd percent of the world have universal social protection as a resilience foundation and indeed 73% of the world's people have little or no social protection. And when you look at the convergence of crisis, if we don't transform every industry, and that means a responsibility for workers and for jobs, then this crisis, which is exacerbated by the health crisis, will get worse. But when you look at the global labor market, it's broken. You have 60% of the world's workers working informally, no rights, no minimum wage, no social protection. That's a disaster for business as well as, of course, for the survival of people. And COVID simply exposed that for that 60%, if they don't earn money every day in an economy that's simply shut down, they struggle to survive. The 40% increasingly insecure, short-term contracts, platforms undermining secure work with no regulation. Thanks, Nicholas, for taking this on in the EU. But we are seeing a breakdown in responsibility for human and labor rights. Now, the companies Jonas and Sena talking about, I work with. And they are putting in place minimum wages. They are committed to dialogue, not so much the American companies, but to social dialogue and collective bargaining, certainly in the European model. And we know that it will take four or five key demands to enact a social contract for labor. The first is jobs, jobs and jobs, a return to full employment. Those jobs will be different. They will, in fact, require re-skilling. They'll require looking at where, indeed, we need to shore up the models of labor rights and social protection. But we must have jobs and there must be climate friendly jobs. We have no hope of putting a floor of confidence or trust or, indeed, optimism back for business or for people. We need universal social protection. And we've called for a global social protection fund. We need, in fact, universal rights. And that means the restoration of respect for human and labor rights beginning with freedom of association. The right for workers to actually have a say at the table and, of course, to bargain collectively to share the responsibility for that future. But we need equality. We need equality of income through minimum wages, through collective bargaining. But we also need equality of gender and rights. If you look at the plight of COVID for women, $800 billion has been lost. More women have left the labor market. The labor participation of women has simply collapsed. And, indeed, we know that we can rebuild this if we invest in those public services you heard the minister talk about.  But they're also the enabling jobs that allow women to participate in the global labor market. We will not get an inclusive future if business doesn't reform, if climate, inequality and health are not tackled in the context of realising those SDGs and time is running out. Secretary Boe, so we should have your saying, and this is one of the questions that actually is coming in, a universal citizen income. What I'm saying is that for those workers, for those people who are not in work and not earning a minimum living wage, then the social protection system must include an income base. But why would you pay me an income or you an income share this amount of money when we earn good wages? We need to look after the solidarity that will include the poorest amongst us. And if we don't build that universal social protection floor, then we will not indeed see any resilience against future shocks. That's bad for business, bad for people. But it also is, as I said, totally undermining our democracies. The model of development now is so unjust. And if you want to put it in really crass terms, vaccine nationalism, nine new billionaires created in the U.S. alone by the companies who depended on taxpayers' money in part, large part in some cases, for the research now blocking the intellectual property sharing that would vaccinate the world, which is creating even more risks for all of us. Commissioner Schmidt, Secretary Boehrer, is saying Europe has a role to take a lead here, to talk about European companies taking a lead over American ones. So is this your view as well? I mean, what in pragmatic terms can European Union, the EU, Europe do for this contract? Well, I think we have started before the pandemic. Already the previous commission adopted with the member states and institutions the European Bill of Social Rights with very strong, very concrete principles, how we can really rebuild the social contract on jobs, on education, on skills, on equality, on men and women equality, on youth, on care. So very concrete rights, which in a way compose this new social contract we need, and especially we need in a period of big transformation. And I think we have worked on that. We have presented in last May an action plan how we can really implement this very concrete rights. And Sharon has mentioned what we have done on minimum wage. We are now about, hopefully, to find an agreement on a framework for minimum wages in the European Union, guaranteeing everybody to have a decent wage for the work people do and having decent living conditions. This is a paradigm shift in a way also for Europe. And Nadia just mentioned how we change in comparison to the previous crisis. We have proposed now a framework for platform work, rights, protection rights, labor rights for platform workers. Not these illusion platform workers are self-employed entrepreneurs and they have no protection whatsoever. We have proposed now a real framework for rights for these platform workers. So I think this is, by the way, a very important proposal because it applies to new forms of economic activity. And I am sure that this will extend to other places in the world where the same problems have coming up. And just my last word is on transition. I think we are in a major transition period. And we have to give people certainly the idea that mobility is needed from mobility job mobility, but at the same time people are asking us for security. They have to organize their lives. They have to be sure for their kids. So we have to find a new paradigm also for our labor markets. And I think how we organize transitions, it's not about giving everybody a minimum income. It's about giving people new opportunities, investing in their skills. Thank you, Commissioner. And that is good because to a certain extent it starts to answer some of the questions that are coming in. I'll read one for you because I think it's really what we're trying to hone in on. And one of the questions says it's good to have dreams and a vision. But on the pragmatic side of things, how can we make the global social contract work? So the commissioner started giving a big picture response to that. Minister Calvino. And speak to us perhaps about your own experience in Spain and what that transformation looks like, what those new jobs look like. Yes, as Nicola was talking, I was thinking about the example of Spain because to a certain extent Spain is one of the countries in Europe which has for decades had growth been dragged by the malfunctioning and the dysfunctioning and imbalanced labor market with very high unemployment, very high youth unemployment, low productivity growth, etc. And I was thinking of three main features, I think, of the response to this crisis and the outlook, which are extremely relevant in this regard. First, in terms of the response to the pandemic, and this is an important comparison between the EU and the US as a commissioner, Schmidt was mentioning, in Europe, we have protected the jobs. In the case of Spain, we estimate that more than 3.5 million workers were protected, more than 1.5 self-employed workers were protected as compared to previous crises where a small decline in activity would lead to a massive job destruction. And what we have learned is that it is better to protect its cheaper than to let something be destroyed and then having to rebuild from scratch. And this certainly has allowed the Spanish labor market to recover the pre-pandemic levels in around 15 months, as I said at the beginning, as compared to 12 years from the past financial crisis. There's also a positive side effects to these support measures in that I think that a part of the informal economy that this was referred to is also coming up to the formal economy, because many, many players are realizing that you can have a network and a support framework if you are paying your taxes at maybe also a positive side effect of this framework. A second element coming out of the crisis is that we are really undertaking a big negotiation with our social partners and dialogue with society, I think, is instrumental to rebuild this social contract, to design what social contract we want for the new economic cycle, which is now starting. We just, by the end of December, reached a tripartite agreement with the business organizations and the unions to have a labor market reform in order to reduce temporality, to provide new flexibility instruments to companies different to extremely high temporality and precariousness. Also, to move ahead with a very different kind of job creation framework and let me just have to rush you along because we're near the end of the communication. The final point is, indeed, we need to invest in social skills and re-skilling and training of the whole society if we want them to be able to cope with the structural transformations taking place. Thank you. Great. This is the same question to Mr. Holtzer and Mr. Priesing. What commitment should business make? What single biggest commitment that is numerically, that has a target that can be measured, should business do? Mr. Holtzer, first. People care. Consumers care. But we need to give them the opportunity to direct their spending, to support the development in society. And how can we rebuild trust, how can we create a news social contract with income inequality as we have right now? This coffee cup cost me $3. It's 1 cent that's going to the farmer of the coffee beans. So you have 600 million farmers and very often the ones doing the most important job are paid the least. So if we commit to tracing the cost and the income and make that visible to the consumers, I think that's one very concrete key thing that we can do from business at scale that can drive change. Transparency and tracing. I love it. Mr. Priesing. Businesses are already very actively involved in re-skilling their workforces and upskilling their workforces. And as I highlighted at the beginning, the spotlight on the future of work we are seeing during the pandemic, difficulty to find people with the right skills. So organizations are investing in their workforces to create the talent and the skills that they need from within the organization. But on a broader question, however, I would say the big shift that we have yet to do and that we are not seeing emerge yet is truly the future of work, where employment security is going to be what facilitates the mobility that we need as we're shifting and transforming between industries. And if you think back on a conversation like this five years ago, it would have all centered around the threat of AI that was going to destroy all of our jobs. And what do we do with 50% of the workforce that doesn't have anything to do anymore? And that's a theoretical construct that even at its time was never actually going to happen. And the data is very clear. The technological impact creates more jobs than it destroys, but it requires different skill sets. And I think we're still mired in old fashioned labor market policy thinking as we're trying to imagine the future of work. And when we talk about the investments we're making in climate, 40% of all of these funds, 50 in some countries are going to address climate. And yet a small fraction of that, maybe 10, maybe 5% are going back to support traditional labor market policies. So we are not yet with the understanding of the transformation that is required to support inclusive growth for everyone, reflecting in the policies that we're pursuing for labor markets. Great. We're at the closing. I'm going to give the last word to Secretary Barrow. Mr. Preezing talked about we are still in the old labor market paradigm. Okay. So what is the new one? Tell us forcefully and pithily, if you will, because then we need to go to Sadia. Well, we may differ a little, but Jonas is right on the fact that business has to think differently, but they have to take responsibilities for jobs, secure jobs for re-skilling their workforce. And of course we need governments to be part of that negotiation around a new social contract. Every sector has to transition for climate. But if we don't transition in a way that protects and creates jobs, then we will see more dislocation, more distrust, more despair, that is the driver of all of those things. Spain has done an enormous amount of work with unions, with business to actually drive a just transition, to put in place the sorts of legislative frameworks that Nicola is working on at the European level. So we need legislation. We need serious commitment from business on both climate and on secure work. But we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg. We're very pleased to work with business who want to actually sit and negotiate, think through jointly with workers at the table what the transition looks like. But sadly, that's not enough of them yet. So much reform is necessary. We also can't count on governments. And I need to say this, some governments yes, but the geopolitical situation is such that too many governments are dodging the responsibility for climate, for workers, for society generally. And we need to actually have them step up. But we need to work with indeed businesses who have a value set around inclusion, who care about workers and their communities and don't leave them stranded. I would just say to you the social and environmental taxonomy work in Europe, where optimistic this can become a legislative base. Indeed, we've seen a global standards body set up, but the International Sustainability Standards Board, it's welcome. But where's the international social standards that actually partner with that? We have a lot of work to do and the parties that care about an inclusive future with a new social contract have to be very vocal. So we leave no room for others to simply carry on business as usual. Great. And on that, I must close. I'm just going to say on the words of trust, transition and transparency, I will close, leave the closing remarks to Sadia. Thank you so much to our panelists, Sadia, over to you. Thank you very much. Thanks to all of the panelists and thank you, Alessandra. Last week, our global risk report reveals that the topics that experts were most concerned about in terms of worsening risk, its social cohesion across multiple societies that is getting eroded. What you heard today from our phenomenal group of panelists is the sense of urgency, but also the elements of this new social contract that needs to be built or rebuilt in some cases across societies. Better health systems, better education systems, better care systems, both childcare and elder care, better jobs, better paid jobs. Social protection systems and income support for those that are going through a rescaling or jobs transition, rescaling and upscaling for adult workforces to deal with both the technological shifts and the green transition, and then finally ensuring that equality and equity is embedded throughout each of these features. What the World Economic Forum will aim to do is help move these features of this new social contract along through a few different initiatives that bring the public and the private sector together. I'll just give you three examples. Next week, our global competitiveness report will aim to measure how countries are doing against these elements of a new social contract that will hopefully help change some of the targets that we're focusing on as economies recover. Two, a new jobs coalition that aims to support investment and innovation in those jobs of tomorrow that Sharon mentioned, but also a focus on standards and wages. And finally three, the reskilling revolution initiative that seeks to rescale and upscale as well as provide better education to a billion people by 2030, already made a progress to reach about 100 million people and looking to reach a lot more. Thank you so much and happy to work with you moving forward. Thank you.


Carly Bows, La Crosse. A four-year member of the Mustangs, Bows was a two-time all-conference selection, including a first-team selection as a junior. In her shortened career, Bows finished with 143 points on 124 goals in 19 assists. She also totaled 89 ground balls, 87 draw controls, and 60 calls turnovers. Marissa Inglisa, soccer. A three-year member of the Mustangs, Inglisa was named a Matt Commonwealth Honorable Mention Selection as a senior. She finished her career with 32 points on 13 goals and six assists, while also netting five game-winning goals. Inglisa had a career pass 13 points on five goals and three assists as a senior. Annie Smith Hammond, ice hockey. A four-year member of the Mustangs, Smith Hammond finished her career third in program history with 1,149 saves and tied for second with 21 wins. She is fourth with a 9-1-3 save percentage and third with seven shutouts. A two-time all-conference selection, Smith Hammond's career best 48 saves ranks third.


Hey there. Chad Bonser here for High University Libraries. In this video, I'm going to show you how to use the American Fact Finder, the free data source from the American government to find population density based on the census. So here you go. So to get to the American Fact Finder, you're going to go to factfinder2.census.gov. That's the current URL web address as of the publication of this video here. You can also Google American Fact Finder, it'll also get you there the same way. So once we're here, we're going to click on Advanced Search, and we'll click Show Me All, and we're looking for population density.  I'm actually going to bypass those and click Go, because I don't really want any of those datasets. So I'm going to click Go here. If you scroll down, you can see there's different kind of things that have to do with density. Now, I was looking for population density by county, and so here is one for population housing density by county, by state, and for Puerto Rico. If you want to preview that, you can just click on it, and it'll take you to a page, and you'll basically see what this data looks like. And so here's our dataset here. Looks pretty good. We have Alabama by county, and it looks like we have population housing units and density population housing units per square mile. So that looks good for me. If I scroll down, we see it goes from Alabama to Alaska. So we are getting multiple states. I'm going to go back to our advanced search here, because that's the dataset that I do want. And then I'm just going to click on Make Sure. The one I had is selected, and that is selected, and we're going to click on Download. And it's going to say, yeah, it may take several minutes. So we'll just click OK, and it's going to go, and sometimes it may take a little while to download this, and it will give you an estimated time remaining, that sort of thing. Once your file is complete, all you have to do is click on Download, and that will open up a zip file. Just save the zip file somewhere on your computer, and then once you open it up, you can see what folder it's in. What you'll want to make sure you do is you can go in and extract all your data, and we'll just call it census.edge.download1 there. It's fine. We'll extract, and then the dataset we want is right here. It's called with annotations, I guess, is what that means. So we'll open that up in Excel, and then here we have our dataset in Excel. We can manipulate it however we want to. We can hide tables, that sort of thing. So that's how you find population density in the American Fact Finder using the 2010 decennial census data. Hope this video helped you use the American Fact Finder. Should it need more help, look for the contact link on the business blog. I'll be glad to help you anyway, Ken. Take care, and have a great day.


What's good y'all? It's your Bull Ross back again with another video. So appreciate everyone that was a part of the live stream tonight for Smackdown, man. You guys were amazing. I held down the fort for Doug. He wasn't able to join us. He's in Oregon right now supporting his daughter for the Junior Olympics in track. So, Mariah, you go ahead and bring back the gold, man. We're looking forward to you doing that, man. So, wishing y'all a great time out there. You know, everybody support y'all, man. He will be back next week. So that's why it was just me holding it down, but we still had a good time. So shout out to everyone that was a part of the live stream. But we got to talk about the main things that happened on this show, mainly the bloodline stuff, because that's what you're here for. So we got to talk about how the show started off, started off with Jay in the ring, saying our main event, Jay, you know what I'm saying? Letting people know. Oh, well, now he even got an announcement, you know, before the show started from the announcer, the ring announcer saying main event Jay is here, whatever crowd going crazy. And Roman comes out to his normal stick, you know what I'm saying?  He came out there with the WWE undisputed Universal Championship and Paul was holding delay. So he comes out there and it's pretty much the stuff that we've heard Roman say before, you know, but this time he kind of really dialed in. He let it be known that pretty much, Jay, you're not ready for this.  You've been my right hand man. I appointed you as my right hand man throughout this whole thing only for you to secretly want to be the tribal chief to want to be the head of the table to want to be the guy. At some point, the crowd was chanting Uso as Roman was, you know, talking to him and Roman said, you want to know why they're chanting your name is because of me. That's why they're chanting your name. They wouldn't know anything about you if it wasn't for me. So Roman continues to ask, as he did last week, do you really want to do this? Is this really what you want to do? Jay says, I have to. I never really wanted to be the tribal chief. I never wanted that position like you think I do. You know, I've always wanted to support you, support the family. I've always had your back. I was there whenever you needed through the good and the bad, but you betrayed me. You betrayed the family. You betrayed us all. Once you took out Jimmy, that's when I knew that you don't care. So I have to take you out. So Roman being Roman doesn't want to hold accountability for himself. He's like, no, no, no, that's not on me. This is on you for being selfish. And then he starts trying to reverse psycho psychoanalyze the whole situation to pretty much blame it on Jay. Like when Jimmy got hurt or whatnot, what did you do when you came back? You instantly wanted a title shot after that. How did you really care? You didn't really care about that care about Jimmy. You you honestly just wanted the title when he was hurt. And if you want to be honest, the only reason why you was the right hand man is because Jimmy was hurt in the beginning. And they're playing that up where Jimmy was legitimately hurt at the time. So it was only Jay. He's like, if anything, you stole that opportunity from him. You really are the bad brother in the situation. Solo loves and respects me more than he respects you and y'all are family. Y'all are brothers. Your younger brother loves and respects me more. Like he was really trying to blame it all on him as if they didn't attack Jimmy. We're just going to overlook the fact that Jimmy's in the hospital because of them. But they're blaming it on him and blaming the fact that he doesn't really care because now he's going after the title all of a sudden. And I like that he brought that up. He's really trying to hand it in. And then he even started going even more with the whole situation of, well, say hypothetically, you do beat me. Guess what? I'm going to still be Roman Reigns. But what about you? Who are you going to have? Who's going to be behind you? Who's going to have your back when it's all said and done? And I like that. He said, I can lose. I must still be Roman Reigns. Who are you going to be? I like that. So Roman was cooking them. But Jay, I appreciate what he did here. Jay response, you know, after a while after Roman, you know, was continuously given cooking them up in the oven.  You can't beat me. What makes you think you can beat me? What's in your skull that says right now I can beat you? Because I don't get it. Like Roman couldn't understand the thought of Jay thinking he can beat him. And I love Jay's response. Jay simply was just like, you know what? You want to know why I think I can beat you? Because I already did. I'm the only person that's pinned you in three years. And this made this even crazier. He came in close to the Roman. He put his hand on the back of Roman's neck. So many times, Roman has done that to everyone else in the bloodline because he feels like they're beneath them. Like when you put someone's, when you put your hand behind someone's neck, like they're your son. Like they're your child. He signed them. Like, come here, son. Let me, let me talk to you.  He said, put his hand on the back of Roman's neck and said, and I'm going to beat you again.  And it was great because no one's ever really just came up to Roman and just, bro, that's low key fighting words. Don't put your hand on the back of my neck. But I loved it. It was a great little opening segment. So we cut to the back. There's a little interaction between Jay and Grayson Waller. Grayson, you know, being in the heels and Jay's not going to win it, but he can be on the Grayson Waller. A little talk show effect, whatever it's called. I don't even remember the name. You can be on the talk show after Summer Slam or whatnot. And that's when Jay smacks him across the face. And then we end up getting a match for the main event. So as the main event has started between Jay and Grayson Waller, Roman solo and Paula in the back watching on the TV. Obviously that wasn't going to be that way for long because mid-match between Jay and Grayson Waller, Roman comes out there. Sits ringside in a chair with Paul Heyman and Solo. So they're watching the match and Grayson Waller is getting the upper hand. And then at one point Jay hits a beautiful spear on Grayson Waller. And he's looking right at Roman. He said, that's going to be you. Oose comes up to the top rope, hits the splash for the one, two, three pin victory. So you can see Solo just scamper off to the side. After he won, Jay's celebrating in the ring. And I like that because that's pretty much a shot at Roman. Like I hit him with the spear.  You took a play out of his playbook, right?  That's when Jay super kicks him out the ring. Roman gets pissed. He gets up out the chair. He's getting in the ring. Like, oh, we about to tussle. It's about to happen. And my boy Jay runs the ropes and hit Roman with a spear, beautiful spear. Cloud goes crazy. Cloud is losing it. I'm losing it. He drags Roman's body to the middle of the ring, you know, Solo somewhere lurking. He's going to recover. Goes to the top rope about to hit the splash, the frog splash or the Samoan splash, whatever you want to call it. Of course Solo puts him off the rope. Solo gets into the ring or whatnot, hits him with the, I believe they call it the urinagi. I believe that's what the mood they call it. It's like a form of the rock bottom, but it's not. I believe they call it the urinagi. He hits him with that. Roman's getting up. He's pissed. And I love that they started doing this tag team move. This is so good. Roman is about to run the ropes. Jay is being held up by Solo. He's about to give him the Samoan spike. Roman runs the ropes and hit the Samoan spike spirit combo. I love that move. Knocked Jay out. Crowd's booing. Crowd is booing. And then Roman's like, no, no, no, no, no. I believe the crowd said you still got pinned or you got pinned or whatever. So Roman said, now we're not done. We're going to do it one more time. Runs the ropes, picks up Jay and hits him with the Samoan spike spirit. Roman spears him. Solo hits the spike at the same time. I just, that move looks brutal. And I love it that they started doing that. I love that. And the show goes off the air. Jay is pretty much KO'd. He got sent to the Gulags at the end of the show, but beautiful combination tag team moves that they did there. It's going to be interesting to see if that goes, comes into play for SummerSlam. Overall, great segment. I enjoyed it. I love what they're doing with the story. It's getting better and better. I can't wait to their match at SummerSlam. It's going to be great. I want to see what they do for the Go Home show next week. It should be entertaining as hell. So comment down below. Let me know. Did you guys enjoy this SmackDown? What was your favorite part of SmackDown tonight? What was your least favorite part? Let me know what you rate the show overall. I'm just going to 1-10. But I appreciate all of the support you guys are showing on channel ROTO and 50K. And I'm still your NCP, the YouTube wrestling champion of the world. Appreciate y'all kicking me. See you on the next one. Peace.


Hello everyone and welcome. My name is Melissa Armo and I am the Stock Swoosh. I wanted to talk briefly today about how to achieve your long-term goals. A lot of people are busy every day and every week and they find it very difficult and taxing to ever make any progress with their long-term goals. I get it. I'm in the same position. I have all these things in my to-do list that I wanna get done and I say, well, how am I gonna get it done? How am I gonna find the time? All the things you have to balance in everyday life. The best advice that I can give you and what I've recently started to do for myself is, first of all, the night before the next day, I say, okay, this is what I'm gonna do tomorrow. Or I get up in the morning and say, this is what I'm gonna do today. But I really am trying to do it the night before. So that way I have my short-term goals set up what I'm gonna do the next day within the next 24 hours. As far as the long-term goals, I try to black out time, sometime during the week or a day and a weekend to work on the long-term goals that I have for myself as well. The thing is, if you don't set time aside each week or each month to proceed, to accomplish, to get to the long-term goal, whatever it is that it happens to be for yourself, you're never gonna get there. All of a sudden it'll be 2018 Christmas, then it'll be 2019 and then it'll be 2020. And all of a sudden it's 24 months later and you say, wait a minute, I had this long-term goal to get this thing done and I haven't done anything. It's as if it's not even there. When you take steps and you take full-on real action and I'm not talking about spending hours each week because obviously we have other things we have to do. We have our regular everyday things we have to get done. When you start to work on or do anything at all and take actual steps, whether it's do the work, spend the time, spend the money, towards your long-term goals, you realize then that it's possible to achieve them and you start to feel like, oh my gosh, I'm actually gonna get there. I'm actually gonna get this thing done. I'm actually gonna be able to create this to make it happen. I'm also putting it out in the universe that you're gonna create this and make this happen for yourself, which is extremely important because then what happens is, as you take the steps, small baby steps, medium steps towards your long-term goals, you'll find out that the time shortens up. So say right now it's so far off. You don't do anything to the long-term goal.  When you start to take the baby steps towards it, you'll find that the long-term goal then kind of comes towards you and you're bringing it towards you through the actions, through the effort, through the time, through the money and obviously by putting out to the universe to create it for yourself. So keep in mind your long-term goals. Don't forget it. Very important to think about coming into the end of the year 2018. Good luck everyone. Good luck with your short-term goals and your long-term goals. I hope you achieve them. Thanks everyone. Have a great day.