Rwy'n gweithio y cwestiynau cyfnodd. Why is it so hard to get detailed migration statistics for the UK? Here are a lot of debate, there are a lot of people talking about migration in the news. Often they're using numbers, and actually they're numbers that we are not very certain about. I'm going to come to those two things in a moment but so you know where I'm going and so you can relax a bit, I basically only have three points. One point is I'm going to show you a graph from the Office for National Statistics about recent migration and we'll try and decode it a bit. Then we're going to play a little thought experiment, see what would happen if we decided to close the doors and declare ourselves in here an independent republic and then we had the problem of accounting migration, we'll see how we might go about it and then we'll put the two together and see how it works when you try and do it for the UK. So when you know I'm on that bit, you know I'm nearly at the end. Two statements from the media, different politicians, same week earlier this year. Theresa May sticks to a 100,000-year net migration target. Sustainable level means tens of thousands, Prime Minister says. It's kind of vague, isn't it really? 100,000 and tens of thousands. Day before, Home Secretary refuses to commit to bringing immigration below 100,000. Amber Rudd said there was a lot of discussion around where the student numbers should be included in the target. So the message to begin with here is a lot of important people are talking about it, but no one will commit to any very exact numbers. That's partly because the meaning of those numbers are very loaded. They refer to real people, real people who may be in the UK right now wondering how to read the debate, but also it is extremely difficult to be confident about those numbers once we narrow them down and fill in some detail. That is my only graph, my one statistical artefact for the evening. And that is what the Office for National Statistics published. It's their latest quarterly migration statistics. So it's from August this year it was published and it's an attempt to show what we think long-term international migration was doing for the last 10 years up to March this year. I'll decode it just a little bit. The first thing to realise in here is that the magic number you just came up with, that 246,000 that you correctly guessed, is over on the right-hand side here. And that was the best estimate from the last quarter of how many people had stayed in the UK over the last year once we have taken the top line, which is the people coming in, subtracted the bottom line, the yellow one, which is the people going out and assumed that the remainder is the net addition to the population from international migration. And are there any international students in the room? Anyone who described themselves as an international student? Welcome. You're the only guy owning up to it, I suspect there may be more. The reason that matters is because it was in Amber Rudd's statement there, and how many of those people are international students, whether they should be included in these numbers at all, and what long-term means for students are all really contested issues, but some of the figures might say that they contribute about 80,000 to that number, so it kind of matters a lot as to whether you're going to hit any particular target, certainly a few tens of thousands. The other thing to realise about this 246,000, I'm aware now you've told me what you've done, that there's quite a lot of you with a degree. The only concept I want you to realise is that when we do a survey sampling, often we have a small survey and we're trying to guess about a big population. None of these lines are counts of people. They're all estimates based on a survey. It's quite a small survey and we'll say something about it in a minute. When we do that survey, we might not get the number quite right, and if we did it again, we might get a slightly different answer. If we did it again, we might get a different answer again. The confidence interval around that 246,000 is such that we're 95% certain we're within 42,000. This is quite a bold estimate, but it's got a big level of variation around it. If you then take a look at how much the line changes, it goes up and down there, often the change is much less than the confidence we've got in the number. It might be in the right ballpark, but it's not going to be much use for getting very anxiety-ridden about whether the number has gone up by 10,000 or 20,000 or gone down, but it's actually within the margin of error of the whole exercise in the first place. Let's decode it a bit further. The first thing is this is long-term international migration, and you've already established that you know that that means we're talking about people intending to stay in the UK for a year or more, so the way the United Nations do it is international migration, so it's helpful if all the countries measure it the same way. So we're talking about a year or more. Most international students would be counted as in long term in that definition, it's the way it's done. The other thing about it is, of course, that the most recent data are provisional, because you can't really be sure about what's happened if people have stayed for more than a year until you've waited at least a year since they arrived and then had another go at working out what's happened. So whenever we look at migration, we're always looking at what happened sometime back, and if you've got a lively political debate going on, people making decisions about, well, Brexit, not sure about what these politicians are saying, I don't like the feel of how it's going, I might make a decision now. We're always quite a way lagged when we understand what's been going on. We're looking back in the past a bit. Another thing here, I mentioned that we work out what we've got as the immigration and what we've got as the immigration, we take one from the other and that's how we get our net migration figure. That's fine, makes sense, except as I've already hinted, we don't actually have an exact count of either the immigration or the immigration. We've got a lot of conflicting different data sources that give us a clue about what those numbers ought to be and then we try and put them together to get an overall answer on that we will unpack in the next couple of slides. Last thing to realise about this one, it's a very peculiar graph when you look at it harder. So around about 2011, those bars at the bottom are drawn in a different colour, they're done at a different frequency and they're labelled as revised net migration and that's because in 2014, when we knew the results of the census from 2011, everybody had a hard look at the numbers and worked out that it simply didn't add up what we'd been doing from 2001 to 2011 because the series of the counts of migrants coming in and migrants going out simply did not add up to the stock of people who the census found who told us that they'd come from another country in the last year or been born in another country and as a result, the method for doing the counting was revised, the numbers were restarted and they're completely inconsistent at that point. The net migration figures are an official revised answer but the top line and the other line haven't been changed. So when we look into the past and we change methodology, we don't have a consistent picture and that's really important as well and it will be really important for any of us interested in this debate if you go forward a few years because what I'm going to paint for you is a picture in which the methodologies are all going to change and the thing we can be sure about is that we will then disagree about the numbers we've got now because the new methodologies will almost certainly give us a different answer. So, 0.1 dealt with, 0.2 thought experiment. Let's think about migration to a small venue. Let's just imagine that about 7.30 we shut all the doors, had a referendum and declared ourselves an independent republic. When I walked down the road, I walked past Barcelona and I thought, what a shame we're not there. Never mind. We'll do it for here. We could imagine that there are people who've come here from somewhere in Southampton City Centre this evening. Anyone come from somewhere around Southampton City Centre? Maybe stretch as far as Highfield? Quite a few. A few people who came from somewhere else in Hampshire did withdraw anybody from Basingstoke, Winchester and over. A few. How far? Tottenham. Tottenham? OK. Well, it's almost the rest of Hampshire. Point is, we've got different domains out there where people may have come from. If we think about what's happening, some of those people may have come in, joined us from Central Southampton, maybe after work, and then when they go home they'll go back somewhere further away. I'll be doing the reverse journey. Some people will come in and go back where they started from. Effectively, it's already becoming a slightly more complicated picture. Of course, in our independent republic we've declared someone would have to be charged with managing official statistics and this would be quite a problem for them because we're all going to be demanding that we want to set up and run our new country properly. We're going to want information about where are people from and what are they doing and what services do they want? Are they old or young and are they intending to stay for a long time? So this kind of stuff will matter to us. Now, it hasn't happened. I guessed that one or two curious people might be walking up and down above Bar Street and they thought, those people look like they're having a really good time. I might just go in and see what they're doing. So some people might come in just for a quick look but then they'll realise it's me talking and they'll go again. Other people may be here and I'd notice, and it was maybe 6% of the people who said they knew a speaker so it may be that some of you are just here because you're desperate to hear what Julie's going to say later on and some people will just come in for Julie's talk, there'll be a big surge and they'll listen and then they'll go again and they'll kind of be with us for a while but then they'll be gone. And some, stars like most of you, I'm guessing, are here for the whole event. So our migrants are coming on different timescales from different places going to different destinations and they're all playing different roles so I'm currently speaking but I will, for your keeping you happy, shortly sit down and become a member of the audience. John there, I suspect, is being tech support for the entirety of the evening but people's roles and reasons for being somewhere change. So we can obviously play this game for a while but you see that it would be quite a tricky job for us to work out exactly what's going on. How could we measure this? We could freeze everything and count everyone so we say okay, nobody move, Sylvia can't move, can't do that. I need to count everyone. We get everyone exactly where they are and we go round and we say where did you come from, where are you going, what kind of person are you, why are you here and we have really good evidence base but the problem would be that shortly afterwards some people would leave, some people would come in, some people would change roles, it will all be out of date again. No use. Kind of helpful but didn't last very long. Another thing we could have done which is a bit like what actually happened is we could get somebody to stand at the door and count who comes in and out. A sort of entrance and exit survey it might work for this venue but it's going to be tricky if our nation becomes very popular a lot of people join us. We have actually got more than one exit because you all checked, fire escapes didn't you? We're going to have to man all the doors and then we're going to have to be there and we'll count all the people in, all the people out and work out what's going on. We certainly couldn't just rely on the tickets because there may be people who are here without a ticket on one of them and there may well be people with tickets that didn't come so people's intentions and tickets and visas and things like that are not reliable. Or a third strategy we could put a big list of everybody work out where they were and follow where they go except we haven't got a list so that one's not going to work. Count everyone, we get the stuff in the middle count them all in, we get one half count them all out, we get another half simple. So if you put those two together that was point two done only one to go how can it be so complicated to do the Republic of Wales 104 job for a small country? Why is it that we are not really very sure about any of those numbers if the counting process isn't inherently that complicated?  We have visitors coming into the UK more than 100 million people come in of the UK every year the enormous majority of them are not migrants we've already seen those numbers they're in the hundreds of thousands so a huge churn people coming in visiting relatives seeing Tower Bridge going on trips Stonehenge Scottish Islands loads of people come in they do short courses they do placements with their employer doing all kinds of very valid reasons for coming into the UK for a week they may be around for more than three months in which case they'll fall into a category that we call short term migrants or they may last for more than a year in which case they'll fall into that long term migration category and we've got them all going on and we've got of course all of the reasons and more why people would come they might come to work they might come to study might come for many other reasons work and study are the biggest ones I'm speaking of the migrants into the UK in the period in the last bar of that graph 558,000 people came in in ONS's latest estimate about 250,000 round numbers of them came to work and about 135,000 of them came to study that was their stated intention when you scale up the survey data so those are the two biggest groups but of course something very important happens here that matters a lot and that is that people switch around between the reasons they're in the country so someone may come in as a student and then stay on to work they may come in to get married and then stay for years they may think they're just coming to stay for years and it doesn't work out and they're gone again and one of the challenges we have is the reasons people come in and out of the country once they're here we can't capture any of that stuff there is no border survey we said we're going to do this and now you're going to do that we simply don't know and therein is one of our big sources of uncertainty and one of the others is that we are not very certain because we've got a very small sample of a survey taken at a few places driving these numbers how do we count them same as here we can freeze everything and count everyone we try to do that with a census last one in 2011 migration and out migration data were quite wrong and we tried to correct the methodology but of course that was a long time ago a lot has happened since 2011 so we've changed the rules we've had a big political debate we've had a referendum all sorts of other stuff has gone on in the world those data are not going to be very useful to us we're not doing another one to 2021 who knows where we'll be by 2021 and what we learn there may only be valid and helpful for a year or two and then it will be gone again so that's nice, it works it's brilliant, really rich data source but not very useful in the long run we could stand at the entry and exit points and count who comes in and out so this is the like checking tickets at the door except we don't do it what we do is a bit of a hybrid we have an international passenger survey which is currently the main source of those statistics I will tell you a little bit more about it but it only covers a very small proportion of the people coming in and out of the country and only a very small proportion of them are going to be migrants or we could monitor everyone on a list but just like the lounge 104 we haven't got a list but we are working on it and where we're heading with migration statistics is a bit of a hybrid of those last two census does that just like it would for the people in the room international passenger survey bit like what we did counting them all in and counting them all out except we're not counting them all we're counting a very small fraction it's face-to-face interviews at airport anybody here ever been interviewed by the international passenger survey a couple at the back I wanted to be interviewed by the international passenger survey and I could see them doing it at Heathrow and I walked round the cosmetics but they wouldn't select me because it's quite a carefully regulated exercise but look what happens it's a really complicated survey 700,000 completed interviews most years and that's still 0.4% of the international travellers 80% response rate is fantastic only 4,000 long-term international migrants revealed in that way and all we're discovering is what people tell us their intentions are when they come in of the country or go out again someone who quite rightly tells us I'm coming here to do a masters props out of their program after two weeks and he's gone that piece of information is kind of lost to the system likewise the person who says I'm coming to do a masters they do their masters, they do their PhD they get a fantastic career and they stay and work in the UK this really only captured the intention that they were going to be a student we know nothing about the people who switch intentions so in there is a mystery about that huge uncertainty with the numbers that are based on the passenger survey it's probably not too bad for the absolute count but it doesn't tell us much about the characteristics of the people we're almost at the end, where are we going well those lists what if we had everyone on a list we've got a stack of lists we've got lists of asylum seekers people have applied for visas from outside the EU in order to come in the UK only in 2015 did we start routinely checking everybody's passport as they exited the country and we have the beginnings of a system to work out what the numbers of the flows are you might think that's crazy we stopped doing it on paper in 1998 we only restarted in 2015 there's a few other systems there none of them are joined up just like you'd expect from British Government nothing is connected lots of IT problems we've been talking about making an integrated system for a decade and we haven't done it yet we may be on the cusp of getting there but what will happen is that when we get there all the numbers we think we now know will be rather wrong because the new system will measure it all differently and the students and the people who switch intentions will always remain very very difficult last slide we haven't got any single comprehensive or compulsory way of measuring the migration numbers we do have a decent survey that we stand and do at the exits and entry and it gives us a reasonable ballpark number but it's got a very big confidence interval around it what exactly you count depends on your definitions so if the government makes their minds up about the students then it'll change the number a lot whether we count them in or we count them out cut them one way or another the administrative data sources are like people doing a giant jigsaw which is being done but too soon to see the picture and my message for you is just like us in the republic of lounge 104 all of those migrants are real people they change their minds they have complex lives they meet folk, they get married they decide to return they come back again make some friends this evening don't fall out with anyone over arguing exactly what the numbers are there you go, finished


We thought Unity was doing well, so it was way bothering, so we just open sourced it and put it in GitHub. So we went through the whole backlog, we sorted everything, and then I started also reviewing pro-request. This looks cool, there is an editor, it's very interesting, I kind of got into it. And then at a certain point my friend comes and says, oh, my friend has found this random engine. And so, since it's open sourced, I decided I could check the code, and then I found a fix. Send pro-request. One day I got contacted by Juan and he said he wanted to work there, and that's how it started. So far it's been pretty good, because I actually enjoy doing my work a lot. And so I went on GitHub and searched for Game Engine, and then it did the Godot. This past June I went to the Godot sprint and user meeting in Barcelona. I met a lot of familiar faces and was lucky to get to interview some of the people behind the engine. I asked Juan, the co-founder of Godot, how he got started with programming. My parents were sending me to study computing, which at the time was like logo programming. So I started learning logo when I was like eight. I kind of learned to make games with it and moved to basic, and then I got a Commodore 64. I was using basic, but it was very slow. So I asked like an uncle I had, and he gave me an assembler book for the Commodore 64. After doing my more completed games when I was 16, like 95, just using mostly Pascal and assembly. I finished a game that I put some videos on my YouTube channel called Nuku. It was kind of like Mario, but it was weird. And then when I finished high school I went to university, started to do this more professionally. So I started getting like two with other people, very young, like finishing high school and dreaming of having a game industry in Argentina. Juan is one of the most prominent faces of the Godot engine. To search him online you will find many talks and interviews, but before the engine got public and many people started contributing to it, the other half of the project was Ariel. Juan met him there in 1996. Before the internet, there were some systems called BBS, bullet import system that connected you to a modem, and there was a chat, it was like a mini-internet. There was a chat, you could play, download files, play games, and there chatting, and the program was games in Pascal. And then, in 2001, Juan was with a group of people making a game, an MMORPG. It's the classic that they do with what everyone starts with. It's too big and stuff, but we were all like, let's do this. If you try to pinpoint the exact moment the Godot engine was created, you will soon notice that there isn't an exact date. The engine is something that they both develop in their journey, constantly changing and adapting to the projects they were working on. The first thing I did professionally was founding NGD Studios, which is a company that still exists today, it's called Nimble Giant. We put some other people who wanted to make games, and we worked on an MMO, which was called Indian Champions of Ragnum. I only worked for a bit more than a year doing the engine, the core engine. Then I left to do other stuff, but they continued and they published the game. Then I worked for many, many companies doing consulting and technical consulting, and eventually I was like, OK, I want to have my own company. So I joined Martina and other guys from Occam Studio, and Occam Studio was not really for making games, but we made it a game company working with them. It was really good synergy. They were very creative and it was very technical. So in very few years we got from not getting any clients, to getting to work for Square Enix, Turner, Koch Media. We published many games. We published a game with a football franchise. We published Ultimo Carnival for Square Enix. We published Documentosa, which was an adventure game. It's on Steam, all made with Godot, of course. So eventually, because the country is very, very, very unstable, I decided to close with my other partners, close the company, and just started doing consulting, mostly business consulting, because I got a lot of experience doing business. I was just working on the engine that I opened Source with Ariel in 2014, because we didn't plan on selling it. It was pretty good, but turning it into a product was too much and we didn't want to. We thought Unity was doing well, so it was way bothering. So we just opened Source and put it in GitHub. From the beginning we opened it. At the beginning it was Dual License, GPL, and a commercial license for QT, because QT was like that and we liked QT. But after a while we were using Godot, we started using Godot to work, and as we had work making games, there was nothing that could really be used in production. The motivation isn't the business, it's MIT, and that's much easier for everyone. But since people were using it and I was doing other stuff that wasn't taking that much time, I started working on it as a hobby, like taking issues and fixing them, like reviewing pull requests and getting more people to contribute, but eventually it did grow very fast, like a couple of years later. In 2018 it was already being used by a lot of people, and it grew exponentially from then. But what do you do when your project suddenly becomes popular? While they were working on the programming side of things, they needed some help with managing the beast that Godot was turning into. That's when Remy comes in. Remy is a crucial part of what Godot is now, but at the time he was working on another open source project, a Linux distribution called Majaya. I asked him about his introduction to open source. I actually did a bit of everything, since when I started I had no real technical skills, so I was working on the French translation, and then since I had free time and I was ready to take responsibilities, I became the team leader for French translation and then the team leader for all the internationalization teams, and then I started also working on documentation, on bug-training, on QA, and then eventually I learned software packaging and a bit of development. I was a packaging team, so I did a bit of everything, but then gradually I got into the more technical things, and as a packageer that I came to Godot and I was like, ah, that looks cool, I already package open source games, maybe I can package these so that people can make games on Majaya. And then I saw in Godot that there was a lot of potential, but I could see what was missing in terms of handling the project so that it succeeds better. There was a huge backlog at the time, huge, it's much less than now, but the project was much smaller. There was a lot of open issues which had actually been fixed and nobody had bothered closing them. There was a lot of pull requests which were not being reviewed. A lot at the time was like 100, now we have 1,500, but they are being reviewed, it's just the volume became massive. But Juan was the only one in charge and he was like, he's working really single-threaded, so he was working on stuff and then once per month he was checking some pull requests and he was like, yes, no, yes, no basically. So I poked and poked and said, we need to organize this better and then eventually it gave me permissions to organize the issue tree age with a team of contributors, many of which are still active now. And I was there and I thought, okay, don't you want to join also the GitHub organization, I can help you with bug triaging, which was did mostly at the time and I was very interested in doing something with G-Descript. So I asked Juan if I could do optional typing for G-Descript and he said, okay, go ahead. And so around that time I was looking how maybe I can contribute to something and I found out it was 2015, so GitHub just came out in that moment. If this looks cool, there is an editor, it's very interesting, I kind of got into it and my first PR was a small fix for gravity in the Godot physics. I don't load it and then I liked it. But there were some small things that weren't that great. So I started like maybe I should have looked at the code and it was quite simple, so I did some improvement. I started doing game development in university and then at a certain point my friend comes and says, oh, my friend has found this random engine. So I feel like it's a bit like cheating for me because I actually have a lot of programming background. So when something doesn't work, I go like, alright, I'm gonna fix it. I was 17 at the time. This is also where I started eventually doing contribution to Godot. At first I was just doing small things, like maybe changing a default setting or maybe fixing a small bug, but then I started becoming more confident in my abilities and certain implementing features that people eventually appreciated a lot. Well, I started using Godot when I was in university so I was just studying and I got into video games and then I started using Godot and I liked it. I fixed one issue, it was good, I fixed two issues and then it's the whole world. You want to do your best because everybody is seeing your code like if you work on a company and you can hack something together and it works and then you just forget it but here there's a record and everybody can see it. What we try to do is do it a bit different that you would do if you're a company because Godot has a lot of contributors doing things. We don't really have the classical structure where you really put KPIs and measure performance or it's more organic, we have people, we cannot micromanage them so we expect them to be self-driven and to take the lead in the areas. If we see that there are contributors doing something really well and they are doing it in their free time but they have proven that the way they do it is great, it's very easy to merge, it's something that is done the way we would expect it to be done then we try to use the donations to hire that person to continue working and do that for a job, you know? That's how we think and that so far works really well like this has made Godot improve lots the past year. The downside to that is that maybe it would be nice to get some parts of the engine worked but nobody is doing work there so even if you have the money there's not much you can do. Like many people in the community say why don't you do bounties? You put a bounty to make a feature then you select the person that you think that's going to make it and then you pay that person but in reality it doesn't work like that the problem is that if you have somebody that you pay to work that person may need help because if you want them to do things the way you believe are the best for the project, like I don't know writing the code in a certain way, doing it efficiently, using everything properly like you need to spend a lot of time helping the people do what they need to do instead of like you working on what you have to do. As you can hear this is a very different operation to what you might expect from a project of this size. There are other open source projects that are dealing with the challenges that Godot is but I don't think there are many at this scale yet so there's still a lot to explore. The interesting thing about Godot is that I don't really have like a super clear vision about it to me it's more understanding what others want and seeing how we can be smart enough to put it in there we take our time but we try to make it really good but it's always trying to follow what community needs so we focus the most on what has the most demand or just people coming and saying I just take it and that's great. I'm really looking forward to Godot 4 being released because it's quite stressful to like always be in the rush of development or something so unstable while also working on the 3.x branch. The most exciting thing for me working on Godot is that I am a tool maker and it's amazing to see everything that the community is making with it so I really feel like someone making pencils for painters and then I see the amazing paintings that they are creating which are way beyond anything that I could do from a creative perspective but I know that they could also not do it without the work that I and the team are doing to enable them so it's really nice feeling to participate in that. The anticipated version 4 of Godot is going to be releasing soon and the team keeps working very hard to make it a reality so while my initial goal was to make a small documentary on the story of the engine I think this project has still a lot ahead.


What's up guys and welcome back to another Johnny Q video. In today's video we're going to be unboxing a duty belt by duty man. Let's get into it. Prior going to the academy I was provided a duty gear and a duty belt by my agency. When I got to the academy I realized a lot of the guys there weren't provided good gear or quality gear and some didn't even get any gear at all. A lot of those guys told me they had to go and provide their own gear go out to the market and buy expensive gear and because some of those guys couldn't afford the good quality gear they got pretty cheap and crappy gear. And that's why I'm making this video and you guys know me I'm transparent and I want to let you guys know that duty man did send me this package. It's got a full gear setup for guys going into the academy for guys who are officers who want to get a different duty setup. Duty man did send me the setup let's unbox it see what's inside and kind of go over the gear and see if it would be useful for you guys on the road. Okay so right now this is the radio holder and it swivels. Okay we got mag carrier. We have a either baton or mace carrier cool and this I think this is the baton carrier a cuffcase just just so you guys know the packaging on this quality package I mean look at that look at that quality packaging duty man on the top I like it I always appreciate quality packaging from quality companies and then this is a keychain you got you need a keychain because if you're trust me you gotta put your keys on your belt you need them like pretty fast you gotta get them belt keepers something I didn't know going into law enforcement is belt keepers police officers use belt keepers on their belt because it holds the velcro and the actual belt to your person like that makes sense I didn't know that belt keepers can I just say the smell factor on this is incredible I love leather and yeah this is great the belts that were provided two and a quarter inch sand brown two road stitch duty belt and then also a one and three quarters plain garrison belt so this belt would be the two and a quarter sand brown two row stitch duty belt right off the bat this already feels like the quality that was provided to me by my agency if not a little bit better just because of like how it feels okay first I'm gonna take these out of the plastic then we'll go one by one don't need that let's see let's put my handcuffs case or my handcuffs in here cool that fits also great smell too what's next in the box this would be for a baton let's see my baton oh yeah that fits a little snug but gotta keep it snug right okay and then we have belt keepers we have a radio pouch that is able to swivel to fit your needs which is great because if you're on the road let's say you're chasing someone putting hands on someone and you know things tend to move on your belt and the fact that this allows you to move with the radio that helps too oh this would be the keychain you know you need you need this this right here lifesaver awesome put that over there and then in this package we have a mag carrier which is cool quality these are a glock 17 mags I'm comparing this to my leather belt that I got issued in the academy and I'm not gonna lie to you already off the bat it feels even better than the one that was issued so the cool thing about duty men is that they provide quality gear at an affordable price remember when I talked about the guys at the academy and when they got to the academy they were not provided quality gear and they had to go buy their own and they were buying cheap gear well duty men fixes that it gives you quality gear at an affordable price so let's see here this would be for the mace that fits real nice okay so I got everything out of the package let's get the belt keepers goes off to the side oh yeah these are nice cool everything is really leathery and stiff but you know once you maneuver it it gets flexible it flexes to your body you're good to go just so you guys know the belt buckle also does come with the leather belt this belt buckle is going to be the two and a quarter sand brown belt buckle and it's me not a nickel okay so here's what I'm gonna do next I'm gonna set up this duty men leather belt setup and show you guys what you're going to get when you do order and set up your duty belt and just so you guys know I'll be attaching a safari land holster with a staccato p on this duty belt here's what I like to do first what I like to do is kind of configure what I'm gonna need on on my belt right I'm right-handed so my firearm will go on the right side of the duty belt I like my mags to be kind of in front of me but on my left side and so that means we're gonna start with our mag carrier before I put my mags on my other belt I like to take a long flat head and put it through the opening in the back I like to make sure it's stretched out even though this leather is very good quality it's going to be stiff the first time around and once you have it on your belt it'll form to you it'll be more flexible but just to get the leather belts inside I want to make sure it's nice and stretched this is something I learned while setting up my belt in the academy and it was really hard until I started doing this so that helps a lot I'll start feeding the leather belts in here and you're gonna have to kind of like wiggle it through just because it can get a little difficult sometimes but as you can see that's slid right on through which is great so what I'm gonna do I'm gonna grab my mag carrier same thing I did earlier put my flat head through and kind of just stretched it out get it through there we go nice and then what I'll do next I'll grab my radio pouch and I want that on my left side just because I use it for my support hand when I you know dial that little knob on the radio so I'll feed that through like it's smooth and I think because of the quality of the leather it's helping with the feeding of the attachments okay got my radio on here and now I want my baton I'll feed that through very easily I'm gonna keep that on my right side with my firearm and what I'll do now is I'm gonna feed here let's we'll take that out for now and we'll feed the safari land holster and what I typically use is a safari land holster and it's gonna be the three level safety safari land you guys can use whatever you want or whatever your department gives you so what you want to do with these is you don't want to feed it through the loops the wrong way obviously you want to feed it through kind of going out and in and then once you're in going in to out if that makes sense so oh man that's so smooth okay I keep saying it's smooth and it feeds really well because it does okay when I was attaching my attachments to my leather belt before I started the academy it was really hard to feed them through and I love that the same brown belt provides you that ease of use which is just great I keep honing in on that but I love that it's like one of the main features I'm loving right now so okay that feeds through pretty great and as you can tell this same brown belt does keep strong with the safari land holster and it won't budge like once I put the belt keepers on there that thing in budget finally what I'm going to put on there is my cuffcase and I want the cuffcase sitting kind of more in the front area kind of almost appendix style but like kind of one two o'clock area just because it's just going to be easy if I have to put hand on someone just take the cuffcase I open it grab my cuffs and I'm good to go so let's see here let's kind of bench it up and we'll go from there so we'll put mace okay put the baton the mags lastly I'm going to add the key chain put it through the loop and it's going to sit right right there next to my cuffcase it won't be too bad and it won't be in the way also you have the added fastener on the actual belt itself so that when you put your belt on you can put this in front and it kind of fastens your belt all together so when you get the belt together it looks like this mags, mace, place radio you have your key chain cuffcase firearm and baton so that's what it is now let's try it on and see how it feels and how it looks so before I put on the duty belt I gotta put on the garrison belt that comes with the duty belt there we go so that's what the belt loops will attach to once I have the duty belt on these loops these hooks when they attach that ain't going anywhere that ain't going anywhere let's try it out oh yeah put that through okay so here's what it looks like my cuffs this flourline holster baton, mags, mace like I'll tell you right now this already feels a lot better than what I had in the academy going in and I had quality gear like mind you like it was pretty good okay and this just feels like I can work with it I can roll on the ground I could put hands on people but I don't have to worry about this shifting I know a lot of guys out there that go to an academy or go on the road with you know secondhand gear or hand me down gear but if you want some affordable gear with you in mind well then you need to go to duty man and get yourself a good setup a good belt good mag carrier cuffcase baton and mace carrier and belt keepers if you want to check out duty man and what they have to offer I'm going to link them down below in the description when you do get some quality gear make sure to let them know I sent you now the question is would you upgrade to this belt would you go to this belt if you were on the road or going into the academy comment down below see now what we've got to do is go to the range run through some drills do some sprints push-ups roll on the ground and see how this belt performs out in the real world as always guys thanks so much for watching and I'll catch you in the next Johnny Q video peace yeah man this is great this is a man I wish I had this in the academy let's just feel solid like this ain't going anywhere I love it I really do


Everyone knows how to meal prep lunch and dinner, but the pros know you can't forget about snacks. So today I'm gonna show you how to make two kinds of chicken wraps, Mediterranean, Tex-Mex, throw everything on a sheet pan, four or five ingredients, super easy. We'll wrap these in low carb protein tortillas that will either bake them on a sheet pan or we'll grill them in a grill pan. You got a high protein snack and throw in the fridge, the freezer, you've got snacks for days. I haven't calculated the macros on this, but I'm thinking 74 million grams of protein. Let's look at how to make them. For the Tex-Mex version, you'll need two peppers. I use a red bell pepper and a poblano pepper. Any peppers work here. If you are using a larger pepper like a poblano, you wanna cut it into strips and then slice them in half. You want all your veggie strips to be about the same size. Do the same thing with a medium white or sweet onion and then add everything to a sheet pan, kinda toss it all together, unravel those layers of the onion and then set this aside. The Mediterranean version's even easier. Just add 20 ounces of cherry or grape tomatoes to a sheet pan and then set both of these aside. I will say you can add more veggies if you'd like and that will bulk up your chicken wraps. You'll be able to make more with less chicken. For the chicken, we'll start with five pounds of boneless skinless chicken breast.  That way you can trim off some of the excess fat, connective tissue or skin and then cut this into thin strips. The size of strips is kind of up to you.  I go pretty small, maybe about two inches in length, but don't worry if they're not completely uniform. You can kind of break these up as you're making the wraps later. For seasoning, start by drizzling over three tablespoons of olive oil on each sheet pan and then add two tablespoons of your favorite chicken fajita seasoning rub. I kind of went in a different direction with Traeger chicken rub just because I really love that seasoning. I think it works here. For the Mediterranean, I went with a tablespoon of Cavendish Greek seasoning, which is saltier. So be sure you keep an eye on salt. Try not to go over a teaspoon of salt per pound of meat you're using. And then you'll just mix all these together, get that seasoning over all the veggies and then bake these for 20, 25 minutes in a 425 degree oven. You're looking for the chicken to reach an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit and nicely roasted veggies. Don't expect to pick up a ton of color with this cook method.  And I definitely didn't do this by accident and realized that you could probably save some time just running it through a strainer. I wanted to show you both methods. Whatever you do, don't throw these juices out. Put them in your fridge and you've got a great soup base for later in the week. Once you've got your juices set aside, it's time for some cheese. For the Mediterranean, crumbling some feta for the Tex-Mex Cotija cheese. Although you could use a softer melting cheese like Monterey Jack or Oaxaca for tortillas. Mission, carb-balanced flour are great. And then counter protein tortillas. We're also using that disclaimer. I am an investor encounter. Now, if you need exact macros, I would highly recommend weighing what you're putting into each tortilla. You could weigh your entire batch and then you divide it by how many tortillas you wanna use and you know exactly how many wraps you can make and what the precise macros are for each. Honestly, I'm eyeballing it here because we're not hardcore macro counters. We're just looking for kind of healthy massapine. I will mention that I like rolling these like a chicken wrap so it's open on both ends and then I slice them in half. If you wanted to go the full burrito route, tuck those ends, go for it. Makes it more portable if you're into that kind of thing but we're going wraps here. Once you've assembled enough to fill up a sheet pan, you can throw some in the oven. You'll see it back there behind me and continue rolling. If you want to use a grill pan or a flat top griddle skillet, something like that, I think I like that method better. You get a bit more color, a bit crunchier exterior but throwing these in the oven to crisp that up, officially seal them, works just fine. And there you have it, sheet pan chicken wraps, done and dusted. I like to slice these in half, serve with dips. I'll throw some recommendations in the description below and a link to the full recipe in case you wanna print it. Get a bunch of tips on other flavor combos, things to serve these with, reheating tips. I like to throw these in an air fryer at a low temperature. I think they might be even better, leftover but they're freezer friendly, all that good stuff. So yeah, that'll be linked below. If you liked this video, give it a thumbs up, consider subscribing. We'll see you next time.


To search with a place name and did you map for schools just type your place name for example London in the search box. Select the magnifying glass button. If there's more than one match for your place name the search results will be displayed below the search box. You can select your place name from the list. Note that place name results are separated into two lists UK places and world places. Once you've selected your result a map is generated on the map window that centres on your chosen place name. You should be able to find all countries and major cities with our search tool. What you won't find are places of interest such as Legoland. Your search doesn't work in the same way as say Google Maps. To find your school use the postcode rather than trying to type the school name.