Okay, let's get started because of this session is a short presentation. We only have 25 minutes of time. So today I'm presenting with Christina Ankit. My name is Lauri. We will continue the discussion in a both after after this session. We will start at 3.45 and we will have one hour of time over there. So everyone who is interested feel free to join us there. Hopefully as many of you as possible will be there because of I don't think we have that much time here. Anyway, so let's get started with the topic itself. The presentation that we make today is going to be short. We will also make a brief update what has happened so far. But if you are interested to hear why in a more broader scope than what we are giving today, the original presentation I gave one year ago in Dublin is still up to date, I guess. Nothing has changed so much during one year. So you can still watch it from the Dublin event size. So what we've realized last year was that first impressions should be taken more seriously than what we do at the moment. We have a very valuable opportunity that we are not using that well right now to try to convince all of those users trying out Drupal to choose Drupal over our competitors. Many of our CMS competitors actually provide very beautiful get started teams with a lot of effort put into making them suit very well that one use case. So we want to do something to improve this. So this is what all of the evaluators who evaluate Drupal over our competitors, basically all of these different groups. So we have the non-technical evaluators, we have technical evaluators and IT teams who are evaluating Drupal for their companies internally maybe. We have some developers and site builders who are evaluating Drupal as something that they should build their code on or maybe as something that they should build their clients website on and all of them see this as a first thing. And maybe that's not the best way to convince them that we are up to date and that this is something that you should build your things on. So these are the people that we are building something for. This was something that we put a lot of thought on. We limited out some groups of users and we thought that these are the most important groups of people to convince that Drupal is good. A brief timeline what has happened at which point just to give an idea of what is the history of the initiative, like what has happened so far. So the idea was born in Drupal New Orleans 2016 kind of ish since the idea has been around for, I guess, 10, 11 years already that we need default content and that we should put a lot of effort into the first-time user experience. So it's definitely not a new idea invented by this team. It's more of something that has been around for a longer than that. But in the New Orleans DrupalCon we got the idea that this is something that we probably should work on now because of that could help us get more people involved. So since the New Orleans in June we started doing some planning. The planning took quite long. So we were doing planning till February 2017 when we started a designer recruitment. Basically while we were doing planning we were just trying to find the meaning of this initiative. It's kind of interesting because it went back and forth like we had an idea this is what we want to do but then we didn't know why and then we went back to the why and once we got everything figured out we managed to move forward. As part of that part of this initiative we merged multiple different initiatives kind of trying to solve the same why question and then it became the out-of-the-box experience initiative because that's initially the answer for why. We are trying to solve something to make a better out-of-the-box experience for people. We decided during the planning that we are going to try to record a designer. I personally think that it was a good idea. We had more than good number, more than ten of applications. All of them were good applications. I was very surprised of the level of the applications because all of them were something that we could actually consider making a design like this. So definitely there one of the one of the big concerns we had one year ago was that how can we find a designer. I don't think that was a big problem and I think it was a good way to get a designer. Design was done in August 2017 so it took us pretty much six months to get the design done. Now what we are working on from that on is to build a style guide and actually start implementing all of all of these things together. So what we came up with was a scenario where we had this food magazine publisher with different content types. The most important one was the recipe. There were different ways we were working on that. There was the content model part where we defined which content should be there, like the recipe, for example. For example, the ingredients, which kind of feel. It goes taxonomy, it goes a field, a sample field. We worked with that with content of people because they were working for creating default content for they work and we worked together to came up with something that was also useful in a decoupled environment. Later on we started creating the default content that really did a lot of work on that. Then there's also the installation profile. It started some time before and we just get around that again and finally there's a design where it's going to explain that. But the most important thing here is that all of these parts can be reusable by other initiatives. So all this work, it's done for everybody that can use it. So that's your part. So we just talk a little bit about the design process. So the process itself has followed a pretty good pattern actually. As Larry said, we took quite a bit of time discussing it over. We started by creating a content model and taking a look at wireframes. So we took that content model, started playing around with that content model against this imagined scenario of a food magazine and we produced the wireframes. It was a good process of the wireframe is feeding back into the actual model itself. Alongside that we're able to start coming up with this brand, the idea of the Amami brand. One of the things that was really exciting early on is pretty much as soon as we started producing content model and as soon as we had the wireframes, we also had other initiatives starting to grab hold of the idea and run with it. We had the content to CMS. We heard about that this morning. Really starting to just play around with this model. This is really exciting because it means that we can start to see already that as Christine has just said that this whole idea is reusable. So as soon as we had the wireframes agreed on, we were able to create the designs that were shared amongst the community and you can take a look at those designs. They're up on Drupal.org and also at the moment work that's currently in progress is that we're creating a living style guide that's based on those designs. So you may have already seen this. It's been shown around a little bit already, which is great. So we come up with a front page for the Amami theme. You can see it here. Zoomed out and it's a design that's full of sample content to improve the first time user experience of Drupal. And that's what this is all about. It's just using content, really good content, hopefully, to be visually engaging. Really use that to actually just draw the user in and captivate them. Want the users to get a really clear understanding of why they should consider Drupal. There's some seats available in the front, so you don't have to stand up in the back. Yeah, so we want the users to really understand why they should consider Drupal. They're going to potentially be coming to this without a clue about what's going on behind the scenes. They could be coming from other content management systems, whereas a completely different approach, completely different world. So if we could just do something that welcomes them on board, then that's a good thing, I think. And we want to compel them to dig deeper. So rather than doing what we do today, we saw the slide earlier with the really friendly welcome screen that we're all so familiar with, which has been likened to a giant pile of Lego bricks with no instructions. Go make what you like and enjoy it. That's exactly what we don't want to be doing. We want to be doing something that shows Drupal through a bit of a different lens. It's Drupal inaction. We want to present a demo of Drupal inaction. The default content types of article and recipe, they're given the default content, and that looks great for this in that we can use that to provide an instant reference point. If the users come into this, they're seeing that we've got articles, we've got recipes, and that default content is going to be something that's meaningful to them. Hopefully draw them in to look at how we're actually using that content throughout the designs. We don't want the user to do any hard work. The magazine style content provides the design impact whilst the theme remains lightly designed. That's been the approach that I've taken for the design work. The idea is basically that we use the content itself and design heavily around that content, and that we actually insert that into the theme, but the theme itself remains really light. In fact, if you took all this content out, this would be a theme that hopefully could be reused in a number of ways very easily, just some color changes or whatever. It's thinking creatively like that to make this as reusable as possible. The theme provides scenario-based examples that illustrate Drupal core functionality. We're using the actual content and the presentation of those content to start getting across the fact that Drupal is far from limited in scope. The sort of example topics that we can cover through this demo, we're not entirely sure yet maybe whether there's going to be a tour aspect to this or how we might portray some of this, but certainly at the top level, you can already see that we've got the obvious things like content being promoted, content types being presented, image styles, different image styles, view modes, and of course blocks. The blocks system in Drupal 8 is such a big improvement we're able to start exploring how that can be used through the theme. And the recipe page, we just take a look at the design for the recipe page. So Drupal is great for structured content. Our recipe structure follows what you would expect. So this is following the content model, and as I mentioned, it's already being used by the contenter CMS. And in fact, these recipes, the fields that are in the recipes, are being used to really just drive the front end design here. So we've got recipes which are categorized and tagged. If you go and take a look at the designs, you'll see that we're playing with that quite creatively in the way that we present the recipes on the landing page. Lead images are used for cards throughout, so we're reusing content nicely there. For MVP, the ingredients list is planned to be a simple array. Obviously, that's something that we could look at advancing on if we want to extend the scope of our demo, which is the whole point of this. So what's been worked on at the moment? And who to contact if you want to get involved? So obviously we're keen for people to get involved. If you want to get involved, then come and speak to us. For the style guide, Christina and Mark, who's here at the front, has been really doing a great job of getting that up and running. So we're going to have a style guide in the theme. Accessibility, Andrew McPherson's been involved in helping us get the designs in alignment with what we need for accessibility, which is obviously really important. Content, I've made a start on content. There's quite a bit of work that's already been done, but if you're handy at writing articles or that sort of thing, then my only way is come and speak to me, because the more the merrier. Site build, Larry's taken care of all the site build and the installation profile work, and we've still got finalization of design to do. So there's certain assets that we need to do in the design that need to be really customized for this so that we don't have any kind of licensing issues. And we really want to make it apply specifically to the demo that we're trying to create, that demo experience. And that is it. Yeah, so that's pretty much what we wanted to tell about our initiative at this point. And we would like to start with the conversation about the initiative. We have prepared some specific questions that we would like to discuss because of those are important for us to be able to make progress. We will leave some time for the end for open discussions slash ideas if you have some. So let's go with the structured questions first. So one of the big questions for our initiative is that should we make umami based on classy and stable? So basically classy and stable will have a massive busy break on 9.0.0. So everything we make design wise slash in CSS will be practically useless at that point. And I think the lifecycle of the design should be longer than that. I don't know. Can we make it not based on classy slash stable or does anyone has any opinions on that? Do you have experience maintaining teams that don't extend classy slash stable? Any kind of ideas around this topic is welcome. How many teamers do we have here today? We have few. Does any of you have any experience not extending classy or stable if you have raised your hand? Two people. Do you want to tell about your experience? Did you have anything particular that we should take into account when that happened? When you tried that? Did you actually use it on production? Or yeah? Nothing particular happened? It was all fine? So yeah. So the problem is that... Repeat the question please. So the question you asked is what is the problem that we're trying to solve by proposing that it not extend from classy and stable? So the problem is that classy and stable are frozen but the core slash module markup is allowed to be moved. Core markup meaning JavaScript, CSS, everything. And once we call to 9.0.0, it means that classy and stable will be deleted, meaning that all of bardic7 and umami eventually will be based on the eventually the markup in modules that has changed, meaning that the CSS and JavaScript will break. So if we built this on classy slash stable, it means that we don't have to make any changes for the team once we break BC in the modules. But it means that it will break on 9.0.0 and not be compatible anymore. So I'm trying to read in this issue where the issue says that we're going to remove classy and stable from Drupal 9 and it doesn't say that to me. So could you go into that a little more? Because this was very surprising for me to hear. Oh so stable is going to be removed, not classy, but basically classy breaks when stable gets removed. And it's on the... It should be on the initial proposal of stable. So the idea would be in order for the theme from the out of the box initiative to not have its own upgrade path. But if classy's dependencies on stable break, that means that classy would need to be updated and this theme, if it were extending classy, would need to be updated. So you're trying to avoid having to do that rework? Yeah, basically it's... So when we talk about front end, front end people probably know that if you change the markup behind your CSS, it's like everything breaks because you can't really see what things broke except visually. And that's all of the quality control you can do. There are BC breaks in Drupal 9. I guess I still don't understand why for something that could be many, many years in the future. You'd avoid... Because for... So my non-themor, non-designer perspective is that if we want the out of the box initiative to show people best practices around how to build a Drupal site, we want it to be a showcase of how you would actually build a site. And we recommend that people start from either classy or stable in Drupal 8. So why wouldn't we do that for this initiative? Well, those are exactly the... Yeah, those are good arguments why we should do it on classy and stable. On the other hand, if we want this to be supported for longer than what Drupal 8 is... Drupal 9 could be five years from now or never. When we can add new features in a minor release, there isn't a... Yeah. And we don't actually... This massive BC break that we're talking about, that wouldn't even have to happen in Drupal 9. I'm still not understanding where this is in the issue, so you guys need to do it. But that's exactly the purpose of stable, that it will be removed in Drupal 9. And so, was it replaced with a new... For the... Yes, with the new markup, yes. I got you. Okay, so it's not like... It's that the team is rewritten to match the module markup at the time. Yeah. Okay, so I think... Yeah, my opinion is that I wouldn't make a decision now based on something that's a hypothetical problem years in the future, and especially if it slows down work on the initiative and might also demonstrate to people something that's not the best practice that we recommend when they build the sites. On the other hand, I wouldn't like to block the Drupal 9 release on something like not having any shippable teams in Drupal Core. So... I had a similar question. Like, it doesn't matter if it's years from now. Like, maybe you'll have different best practices that you'll want to update it for anyway. Doesn't even need to be the case that the Umami demo sites or initial demo theme is something that needs to be supported over 10 years or so. I'm not sure if it's... Like, I think it's wonderful that you're thinking so much about PC, but maybe it's limiting yourself too much. Yeah, I personally don't really... Like, if we are fine with that, I'm fine with that. I just would like to make a decision where everyone understands what it means. It's not really anything other than that for me. We don't have a strong opinion about that. Yeah. It also feels like, let's assume we would base upon, like, how's the thing core? Like, instead of classy and stable, I think the additional work we would have to do in the future, it's basically just moved into the now, I guess. And like, we can also just do the work in the future instead of now, and we get something nice out of it earlier. The other question is, where's the future of standard? The use case of minimums, like, you don't have anything, you start from scratch. Is there a future for standard, or would we just stay the same, or do you have any idea about that? I don't think I have any idea about that. I think standard is just someone else's opinion about how the experience should be when you install Drupal, and it could potentially be moved in some of the future major releases. But I don't think there's anything that we really necessarily want to do in Drupal 8 for that. Coming from Drupal 7 teaming, and the last couple years now with Drupal 8 teaming, I've got very used to kind of default classes that come out of Drupal. And I think pretty much anyone else that would be doing teaming would be expecting .field, .fieldtype, .fieldname, and things as classes are the same with regions and nodes and that. And I think basing on classy, for that reason, would help us have more people working on it, and not have to be wondering what class we're going to decide to add ourselves. Any work I've done so far on the style guide is all based on the classes that are output by a class. That's not a huge... If we decide not to use classes, we've got backwards compatibility break with the style guide at the moment, but we'll fix that in two hours or thereabouts. So I wouldn't let that pull us up. But for that kind of a reason, I think my preference would be to say we go with classy, and we do what the contemporary best practice for Drupal is and show it in that way. Okay, so it seems like there is no one who is against using classy. Yeah, I mean, we... I'm not a front-end developer, but I'm pretty sure we only ever use stable as our base theme. And we're doing style guide driven development, that kind of thing. Yeah. I don't think the base theme will limit the way you do your front-end, the way you write your CSS. The only thing it really affects is the backwards compatibility. That's really the only thing that we... In this context that we have to care about, because basically everything we get out of classy, we could get even if we go just extend core, because classy is not allowed to change. So we could technically copy all of the templates from classy as a starting point. Okay, so no one else is against this, so I guess we can move to the next question. So in Drupal Core at the moment, we don't have tools for building component-based teams. Are we fine with the fact that the team will not be component-based? Are we okay with that? Like, is that something we can agree as a community that we don't have these tools in Core? We are not proposing them as part of the initiative to be added in Core. Can we then make it as a non-component-based team? Yeah. Yeah, I was one of the people working a lot on the component-based stuff a year ago. I think it makes sense. Like, you shouldn't expand your scope to something enormous with tackling lots of very, very difficult problems while doing something very tangible and useful for a big part of the community. So I would say go with whatever is the smallest scope and the most sensible, impactful. Yeah, the interesting thing actually about this is most of the front-end developers are only familiar with component-based teaming. That is kind of like, can any of us unlearn doing component-based teaming and build this? Like, how are we supposed to do that? Maybe we need to hire some back-end developers writing the team. Okay. In what sense is it not component-based? Because again, it's certainly from the work I've been doing the last few weeks on the style guide. I've got a directory called style guide. I've got a directory called components. And each view mode is an individual item component in that with its own JavaScript, with its own CSS, with its own template file. And the same for the regions, and the same for the page layer, and same for columns and sidebars and all that kind of stuff. The only problem I do have with it at the moment is that index.php or anything.php is disallowed to be accessed because of the hgaccess rules. But we do have all those being developed, let's say, as components. And then for the Drupal team to work, what I've done is I created a library from every single component, and then add those as a global item in the .info file, if we want it globally, like say the header and filter and things like that. And each individual component gets added by its own twig file. Yeah, so we don't have most of the, we don't have any of the tools from components module in Drupal Core. So we don't have any additional namespaces, we only have to template namespace. Yeah, I'm not sure that we need the components module then. I guess the one problem we do have is that we're not using a twig file, let's say, within the style guide. We're just using an index.php file. So we got a duplication of code then to make sure that the node hyphen hyphen teaser template matches the output that's in the index.php inside the node component that's called it. But we don't have the node hyphen hyphen teaser saying that it extends from a different area. But we still have each individual component can be built on its own and viewed on its own, and then merged into lists for views and things like that. Yeah, I think I get what you're proposing. So it's basically you're proposing a workaround of the limitations of Drupal. Yeah, we'd be rendering each thing with php rather than with twig and then we'd merge the HTML that we want to see, let's say. Based on the HTML I'm writing, let's say, in the style guide is what Drupal is outputting at the moment based on the class. And that's basically the same that we're going to get from the default templates. So we wanted to have the change if we need an extra class in it. Okay, so, but it looks like to me that we have a component-based team. We just don't have components module to fulfill it with twig. Okay. Yeah, I think what Marcus is describing is basically using the infrastructure that Drupal 8 does provide, as well as possible to do component-like things, but not have everything as beautifully and elegantly and architecturally componentized as it would in an ideal system. So it seems like a pragmatic approach to have some component aspects, but maybe not as great as it otherwise. Yeah. Seems very pragmatic and sensible. Yeah. I don't know enough about the components stuff to know if this is the right approach or not, but I do want to make sure that we're thinking about whatever we build and we put in Drupal Core is what other people are going to look at as like this is the way that we should do it. And so you shouldn't, even if you could hack around the way that Drupal 8 does something, we should be really cautious when we do that, because as soon as we do, it's going to become the new standard for how people build themes. And for better or worse, like people do what Bardic does already because it's the first thing that they have and they can copy and paste it. And so we need to be aware of that. Yeah, that's a very good point, I think. Yeah, on that note, I was also, I was nodding along until I heard the part about multiple index.php's and then I became terrified and my heart skipped a beat. So let's please not put anything that does that in core. I'm just setting a ground rule right now for that, but if the design is, if there's a way to build the theme in a way that it's like future compatible to, so that it could be converted to an actual componentized theme when core has support for that, then that would be beautiful, I think. Yeah, so I think, do you have still? Yeah, so it sounds like we, what we actually want is we, so we want to find approach that is, as component-based as possible without hacking around, trying to get the benefits out of component-based teaming, but by not taking the cost of making people hack around this.  Will it slow us down? I think on the implementation part, it doesn't have a drastic impact to one way or another to make it slower or faster. The problem is that once we start finding bugs and once we have to maintain what we've built, then it's going to be drastically easier to maintain it once it's component-based. So that's the benefit we get, but on the implementation part, there shouldn't be a big difference to one way or another. I'll remember that. Is the issue then that, okay, so what I'm doing with index.php files at the moment is, like we said, it's a pragmatic thing, it allows us to at least see some sort of a rendered page so we can start writing HTML or CSS and JavaScript. So we take out all those index.php files because we don't want that stuff in. Can we do that with Twig then instead? And if we can do that with Twig, I don't see the problem then with extending from a component template, let's call it, because it's not outside the directory root of the team itself. So we've got, say, two directories, one called templates, one called styleguide. We're just going to tell the templates to, you know, we'll say, add include directory till whatever it is. If we can get my index.php files to be index.html.twig or something instead. We possibly could but we don't have the namespace in core so we will have to, again, kind of hack around the limitations because the namespaces come from the components module for the Twig templates allowing to include without Pat. But why, I mean, include the relative to the current directory? Yes, so you can. So why can't we, I mean... Yes, you can. And then, like, use attach to, like, add to CSS and JavaScript and that's it, but then that's what he's doing. Yeah, right. But don't get the discussion about the index.php things. I think he's generating a overview of all the different Twig templates with an index.php file and there's an individual index.php file for every single Twig template so that you can view them all. That's how I understand it, but I'm not... I think nobody is exactly certain how you've done what you've done. I think that's part of the confusion. Yeah, so I think it's an unnecessary implementation detail that we're discussing here. I think the whole point is do we want to embed the work of making Drupal better at supporting component-based teaming in this initiative? I think the answer to that is no. I think that's enough for this conversation. Yeah, so the Mark's approach is not actually to do anything with the components itself, but it's to do exactly what Wim said, to allow rendering a style guide, to allow rendering a single Twig templates. Yeah, so that's why he was talking about the index files. So that's another problem that we have. So another thing that we've been thinking about is that what is the difference between the core provided distributions or installation profiles and the contributed distributions and like how could we promote the contributed installation profiles further because it would make sense to promote the contenta inside the out-of-the-box initiative somehow. Maybe as part of the installer, maybe inside the site itself. I don't know, they are very related. They are something that different user groups are interested in, but if we promote this use case, doesn't it make sense to also promote another use case because I would see it as almost as common? Is there something that we would like to do to promote the related installation profiles and what is the difference between these? So I have a related question basically. Driz was talking today about Drupal moving away from blog and static sites and these kind of smaller examples to more complex things. Are you planning also to showcase the work that other initiatives are doing like layout media workflows and these kind of things? Yes, actually the plan is that we would like to extend the demo from node module, block module to the more advanced use cases, but I think we need more experiences from how building demos works for us. Like what kind of different tools do we have to build these demos because it's like if you just install workflows, it's not enough to really give a demo out of workflows. So we need a better way to build demos than just like installing the module. So for node module, it is creating default content. For blocks, it's like creating default blocks. It's simple and that's what we've got figured out now. But for workflows and other things like the more advanced use cases, we have to figure out another way to demonstrate them. And we don't have a solution for that yet but we have discussed about it as part of this initiative and it is on the future roadmap once we've got the first bits figured out. And I think it's very important that we will be able to build demo of those as well. We can go together. Yeah. So for this question, two things. First, I think it's a very important question but it feels again like your expanding scope to a very big problem space. Maybe it's a separate initiative of its own, the discoverability of distributions. So I would personally say be pragmatic again and don't start tackling this problem. However, I do see your point about content being related and so on would be creative. It could be surface but content in particular and actually most distributions to be able to surface it in the regular installer, you would have to have the ability to download additional code which is an unsolved problem. If we had that, we could do automatic updates to some degree as well. So it's a kind of worms that I would say that's not start tackling that as part of out of the box. Yeah. By promoting them on Installer doesn't necessarily mean that it would have to be a download. It could be something else as well. The way you describe it in science and me like in the installer you get standard minimal and out of the box are you mommy and then there's also content and so you click content or radio and then it starts downloading. That's why maybe... Yeah. That's, I think that's the obvious way but I think there is simpler ways to solve it. Like it could be just a link to the distribution as well. Like we have... These are the ones that we ship with. These are the ones that you can download. Like if you're interested about open atrium, go to this link. If you're interested about content, I go to this link. And you feel that that is related to... So the reason why this is related is because a lot of people are asking why are we focusing on this one thing is that we actually... So it's about the out of the box experience and we are solving it for one... These user personas that we have but to solve it fully in the long run we need to be able to promote... We need to be able to make other demos than what we are building at the moment and to maybe make it faster at this point to kind of... Because it's really slow to build these demos in Drupal Core. There would be a faster way around it if we could just promote the examples that we already have out there even if they are not necessarily on the grade that they could be included in Drupal Core automatically. Yeah, that's the same example with the default content. I mean, we didn't create the default content architecture and how to build everything they built it and we are going to use it. So for example, if we work together with the installation profile that it's something that it's also part from this initiative working together we will figure out different uses cases and so on. Yeah, I think you should really not focus on that as well. It's just so much of a problem. Like many distributions like currently don't really host on Drupal.org for example, because they don't have composer support or it will come so I really want to invite people to go to the meeting conversation at five tomorrow about installation profiles where all those problems are talked about and I think that is probably something which will happen in parallel and you should not. In this very room. Yeah, I assume so. What else do you want? I think the solution to like link it from the installer is amazing but how do you like select which things you want to promote? Yeah. Another version of let's start pragmatic. This is the one case we defined so that we may learn how we can do this. It's the first demo we make to find out how we should what we need to make it a repeatable process. Yeah, so this is a special case but with a focused goal right which is a strategic goal so it answers it provides value in its special case and let's use the special case to find out what we need for a generalized approach. But keep track of that don't make it a topic. Yeah, sort of the piggyback on that. I think also once like I feel like very few people as far as people use to actually know about what you guys are doing but obviously like once it's released is like all of a sudden tons of people will know about it and maybe also more people would be willing to work on it because obviously it's promoted if it's right there on the triple installation page and you can do it. So some of the more ambitious stuff could maybe do round two because now everybody knows there's an out of box experience that's different from standard whereas like it's really hard to get that message across until it's every single person who downloads Drupal has this experience and I feel like that'll be a game changer. I don't want to open the can of worms but it kind of feels like to keep it in context you could add like banner space down the size of your theme. I mean I haven't looked at the theme in detail so I can't see if you've got the real estate there you could have rotating banner images that essentially link off to the kind of distribution pages module pages and you can have interlinking things that are actually in context but it feels like it might be a solution to that. Yeah so we have a about umami page actually on the designs where we will explain something about this theme we haven't decided yet I don't know maybe that's the place where we could promote other examples other demos. Yeah so I just want to really touch on your point so I'm relatively new to Drupal I've only been working it for like six months and I think like having it in that sort of option where you can you know just install it straight away would be really beneficial because from my perspective when I started six months ago first going to Drupal like the base theme and I'm like what is this just like full stop like no idea so it wasn't until I worked on you know five six sites where I was like oh okay I understand content types views blah blah blah you know and you start to get the bigger picture but right now I don't think it's going to be that helpful if we don't give beginners like myself some clear indication of this is a good example of what you can do now go back and do your own thing I think we are running out of time I'm pretty sure someone's going to kick me out off the stage soon so we have plenty of questions left that we would like to discuss with you so so here's the details of the of the buff room see you there thank you


Okay guys, let's try this one now. How much does one, essentially one mole of boron weigh in grams? So we know of course from the periodic table that boron's atomic mass is 10.811 AMU. Now we know our conversion factor between AMU and grams. So let's figure that out. So moles of boron have the mass of one boron at, just one boron at. But we know that a mole is a number and that number is 6.022 times 10 to the 24th. So we want to figure out what's the mass of one mole. We have to multiply it by 6.022 times 10 to the 23th. We should get grams per mole at the end. So let's go ahead and calculate that. So we get something very similar, grams per mole, because we've got of course here, grams and here, mole. Notice how close this number is to the AMU. So we can usually just approximate this as saying one mole of boron equals one to one grams.


Hello and welcome to NewsClick. A few days ago, the US government announced that all waivers and sanctions for importing oil from Iran would expire on May 1st. This effectively means that any country which imports oil from Iran after the date faces US sanctions. India is one of the major importers of oil from Iran. And to know more about this decision, as well as the impact on the Indian economy, we have with this ambassador, Talmi Zahmid. Ambassador Ahmed was the former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE and was also an additional secretary at the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. Thank you, Ambassador Ahmed for joining us. Thank you. Thank you for the invitation. Sir, could you first talk about your evaluation of India's response to the US decision, unlike China and Turkey, which have been more defined. India has indicated that it will accept the US decision and said it will make alternate arrangements. So, how do you evaluate the response? I think India is keeping its options open. There is no way India can overnight go into zero imports, which the Americans are insisting on. This is a serious problem for India because in Washington today you have what is effectively a rogue regime. It is a regime that neither understands nor implements international norms and rules. It is the world to accept this scenario in total. You have a president who because of deep-seated personal prejudices, initiates certain policies. The policies are articulated aggressively. They are pushed forward in a very hostile manner against a nation that obviously has done no wrong. I mean, we have a nuclear agreement. The Iranians have fulfilled all their obligations. This is a solemn agreement that not only was approved by the United States, it was approved by all the United Nations Security Council members and is part of the UNSC resolution. So, then beyond the UN resolution, beyond the nuclear agreement, the president has now gone on to tightening the sanctions. I see this effectively as blackmailing the international community for reasons that are completely unfathomable as far as I am concerned. I mean, you are telling countries which have good relations with Iran, which have very substantial ties with Iran connected with their national interest to effectively cut off these ties. I cannot see any rationale for this. So, I think that what you will really see is a scenario where over a period of time, the United States continues to discredit itself, lose all credibility, and the international community will say, go to hell. As far as India is concerned, I think at least India is the second largest importer of oil from Iran and the oil India was getting was actually quite cheap and some of the payments were even made in kind. And even some of the refineries are actually very suited to Iranian oil. So, how do you see the economic impact in India considering the nature of changes it will have to make? I think this is going to be a disaster for India. We are not only major importers of Iranian oil, but Iranian oil is sold to us at concessional rates because of the line of credit given to us for 60 days. We also have, they take care of the insurance and freight as well. So, the landed cost of Iranian oil is far cheaper than any comparable oil that you might get. For example, you have seen in the media, certain other countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have hastened to say that we will make up for Iranian oil, but you cannot make up for these concessions. Saudi Arabia does not sell oil at concessional rates ever. Now, when you buy oil with a line of credit of 60 days, do recall that within this period that crude oil gets monetized and you have already sold in the open market, very often in the international market, you have actually sold the product. So, you are paying back after you've already monetized the import. It's a very major aspect. So, I would say to you that there are two aspects to this. One is economic, commercial and economic, and the other is political. As I am very clear in my mind that the Indian government will take a principled position here. We may not do it crudely. It is not our style and that is not how diplomacy works. This is a crude, Trumpian style. It is not the Indian style. We are not crude in our approach, but I think we have conveyed a message to the Americans that don't push us around beyond the point. We have crucial stakes. We are close to you. We have interests that are common between us, but there is a point at which we will have to part company from you. So, you believe that the Indian government will at some level manage to defy the US Dictat on this? See, let us not use harsh words like defy. The United States does not rule the world. It is not our mother country. It is not an imperial authority over us. So, they have got certain domestic issues. This legislation has nothing to do with the international community. It is purely a domestic legislation. So, it is an extrajudical enforcement. This has no sense. It has no legal validity in the international community. What you are effectively telling the international community that I am blackmailing you, that because I have a certain agenda, you may not accept that agenda at all, but because I have that agenda, I am going to insist that you follow my point of view, otherwise I am going to cut off economic links with you. I am sure there could be a scenario which is not to be ruled out and it was in practice earlier that we will find ways in which we will meet our requirements outside the U.S. sanctions framework. So, maybe some of the possibilities include the alternative payment mechanisms that the EU has introduced or Russia has introduced for that matter. No, and we had done it ourselves. If you remember, we had done it. There are ways, firstly, various payment mechanisms. Plus, you have the barter system. We have increasingly the use of other currencies. See, that restriction is on the use of dollars. There are various ways in which you can do. And you also know from the history of sanctions that sanctions have a very short shelf life, particularly when they have no credibility and serve no useful purpose. Beyond the narrow agenda of a rogue administration, I do not see any justification for what is being implemented and I am personally convinced that it will wither away on the wire. And going to the international oil market as we see it. So, on the one hand, we have already have sanctions on Venezuela, which is another major exporter of crude. And now the sanctions on Iran are even more harsh than they used to be. And while Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have been touted as possible replacements, there are also OPEC restrictions on how much they can produce. So, do you see the possibility of a massive hike in oil prices across the world and related economic issues that are happening? Increase in oil prices is already taking place. You have seen W2I has reached 66 dollars and Brent has reached 74 dollars. So, there has been an increase already over a period. Now, you have a complex scenario. In order to bolster prices, OPEC and its associates outside OPEC have already curtailed production. Now, you have Trump putting pressure upon them to increase production. But these are countries crucially dependent on oil revenues. So, they can only go along with the US agenda up to a point. In the short term, they may try to say, oh yes, we will increase production, etc. But there is a limit. You cannot go beyond this. Iran is a major role player in the oil economy, global oil economy. You cannot just decide that because it suits your short-term advantage and appeases certain constituencies at home that you are going to do something that has absolutely no political or economic justification. And finally, how do you see Iran's situation right now, the internal situation that is? Because the oil production export has decreased obviously. And that was a major source of revenue. Iran is obviously under considerable pressure. But this is not something new. Ever since you had the Islamic revolution in 1979, this country has been under sustained pressure by a combination of interests linking the United States and the Israelis. They have an agenda. Their agenda is to ensure that in West Asia, there is no viable nation that is capable of balancing Israel's interest in the region. And Israel has a maximalist agenda. They therefore have been associating the Americans with the systematic destruction of various entities in the region. Whether it was Iraq earlier or later on, it was Libya and Syria. This has been part of an agenda. Iran is the one country that is standing up to this coalition. And that is why Iran has been subjected to this kind of pressure. There is an extreme right-wing element in Israel as well as in the United States that is working together. And that seems to enjoy the support of Donald Trump. I'm not sure that Trump has fully understood the full implications of what he's up to. But I don't think he cares. As far as he's concerned, he's a populist leader. He panders to a narrow constituency. It doesn't matter that he has the lowest approval rating that the U.S. president has ever had.  But he's wreaking destruction, disorder and also deep-seated insecurity. As far as Iran is concerned, they have been subjected to sanctions from 1979. They have become increasingly onerous. Nearly 10 years ago, the Obama administration had put sanctions on oil as well as on financial transactions. But then they had engaged with Iran and this engagement had culminated in the nuclear agreement. Donald Trump tells us that he wants the Iranians to come to the negotiating table.  If they wanted to engage with Iran, the best way forward would have been to work with the Iranian government, not to reject an existing agreement, but discuss with the Iranian government how you could go forward with regard to issues that agitate you. This was done by the Obama government and it could easily have been done by the new American administration. But this kind of abusive and this kind of aggressive and hostile approach is the last approach you need when you want to get someone to come to the negotiating table. Yes, there is a state of the Iranian economy has been certainly under pressure and there have been from time to time public agitations from sections of their community. But there is no way you are going to have a regime change in the country. There is no way any Iranian government is going to sit in front of the Trump administration to negotiate. This is not the way countries function. If you want to have a viable agreement, it has to be on the basis of mutual trust and it should result in a mutually beneficial arrangement. Thank you so much, sir. Thank you. That's all we have time for today. Keep watching Newsclick.


تبطه آدك الأيام فتاة وتنح و that we also negate ما قاله المبتدعة والضلال we also refuse that we don't accept that which the innovators and the misguided ones they say those who claim those who claim with their misguidance and their corruption they claim that are in the names of Allah and His attributes and characteristics there is Majaz Majaz meaning that Allah's names are metaphors similes and so based on that they start to negate Allah's characteristics they start to distort Allah's characteristics by following what their whims and their desires or the either of blind following مقلدينا لما لا يصلح للقدوة من الضلال or their following people who are not befitting for one to take as an example and as a role model and now the sheikh those points that he mentions which are really very important which are very important he now brings the evidence for it and he says based on that which I have said قال سبحانه وتعالى الله سد سبحان ربك رب العزة عما يصفون والسلام على المرسلين والحمد لله رب العالمين فسبح نفسه عما وصف به المخالفون للرسلي وسلم على المرسلين لسلامة ما قالوه من النقص والعيبي the sheikh said all of that which he mentioned now he is saying because Allah has said ولي هذا and because of that ولي هذا again is a t'alil is a reasoning based on a reason of all of that which I mentioned he said the reason for that Allah has said what did he say سبحانه اقزالتن is he سبحانه again is a ism مزدر من التسبيحي وهو التنزي سبحانه is a verb now may come from the word تسبيح and it is to exalt Allah ثبانك وتعالى سبحانه ربكة the word رب هو الملك السيد المربي لخلقه بنعمته اما بنعمه the word رب is the master the one who nurtures and he cultivates he slaves with his own blessings ربكة يولود رب العزة العزة is القوة والغلبة والمنع والمنع it is the one who has strength the one who has power and attributing عزة الله سبحانه وتعالى it falls under the chapter of what it falls under it falls under إضافة الموصوف إلى الصفة attributing the characteristics sorry attributing the character الله تعالى the characteristics سبحانه ربكة رب العزة عما يصفون يصفون يصفون به المخالفون للرسل ملايلي قبي جلالين the description that the opposition those who have opposed the path of the messengers and the prophets describing Allah that which does not be fit him exalted is he from that so Allah negated from himself Allah has negated from himself that which those who have opposed the path of the proff messengers the description and the way they have described him described him he is exalted from that and that has been negated from him but Allah has affirmed another one for himself he said may peace be upon him the word سلام he is like greeting may peace be upon him the statement على المرسلين and the messengers those in which Allah has sent them with a message to his creation and they have conveyed this message as it should be conveyed وبلغوا رسالات ربهم they conveyed the message of their Lord the way they should have done so وسلام على المرسلين peace be upon the messengers والحمد and the word الحمد we spoke about at the beginning praise be to Allah سبحانه وتعالى رب العالمين the Lord of all of the creation the word عالمين is جب العالم and the word عالم is everything besides الله سبحانه وتعالى there are five benefits that we take from this ayah there are five benefits that we take from this last ayah in surah to safat سبحانه ربك رب العزة عما يسفون last one the second one is وسلام على المرسلين the third one is والحمد لله رب العالمين there are five benefits that we take from this ayah there are five benefits that we take from it the first benefit that we take from that verse is what تنزيه الله to negate from الله سبحانه وتعالى عما يصفه به ضلاله والجوهاله من ما لا يليكم بجلاله to negate from الله سبحانه وتعالى and to exalt him from the description the misguided ones the ignorant ones they attribute to him سبحانه وتعالى they do not befit him we are those who exalt him from it we don't accept that characteristic and that actually would be attributed to him because he does not befit his majesty the second one is the second benefit that we take from these three verses is what that the messengers are truthful and that it's obligatory وَوُجُوبِ قَبُولِ مَا جَأُبِهِ and that it's obligatory to accept that which they have come with وما أخبروا به عن الله and to also accept that which they have told us about الله تبارك وتعالى number three the permissibility and that it's legislated مشروعية السلام to place peace على الرسول on the messengers عليه الصلاة عليه الصلاة والسلام وحترامهم and also to respect them and to honor them respect them number four rejecting ردوا كل ما يخالفوا ما جاءت به الرسول to reject and to repel everything that opposes that which the messengers have come with especially لاسي ما ما يتعلق بأسماء الله وصفاته especially that which is connected to Allah's names and attributes number five مشروعية تثتناء على الله وشكريه على نعمه التي من أجلها نعمة التحيدي that it's legislated to praise الله سبحانه وتعالى and to show him gratitude on his blessings in which he has bestowed upon us especially the greatest blessing which is التحيد which is what التحيد the sheikh went on to say فسبح نفسه عما وصفة به المخالفون للرسولي الله he exalted himself فسبح نفسه he exalted himself عما وصفة به المخالفون للرسولي from that which the ones who have opposed the path of the messengers attributed to Allah الله exalted himself from that وسلم على المرسلين لسلامة ما قالوه من النخص والعيب أن الله تبارك وإتعالى he surrendered and he accepted I mean sent peace on that messengers because of the statements which they have said which is free from any deficiency and any shortcomings which they have attributed to him سبحانه وتعالى then the washeikh went on to say وهو سبحانه and he Allah تبارك وإتعالى قد الجمع فيما وصفة وسمى به نفسه بين النفي والإثباتي فلاعدول لأهل السنة والجماعة عما جاء به المرسلون فإنه السراط المستقيم the sheikh said and in this passage in this point the sheikh رحمه الله he is going to place for you and he is going to clarify for you the methodology and the path of Ahl al-Sunnah in which they are upon in Allah تبارك وإتعالى his names and attributes and this methodology in which Ahl al-Sunnah are upon they took it from the kitabah of the sunnah and it's a methodology الذي يجيب أن يصير عليه المؤمن في هذا الباب المهمي it is obligatory on every single every single believer who believes in Allah in the day of judgment to tread on this path especially in this important point or this important chapter which is Allah's names and attributes so what is it this methodology is that Allah تبارك وإتعالى he combined for himself when he describes himself when Allah سبحانه وإتعالى he describes himself or Allah is mentioning his own characteristics and attributes he combines between what between negation and affirmation بَيْنَ النَّفْ يُوَلِثْبَدْ negating from himself what negating from himself anything that opposes his completeness all types of deficiencies they fall under that such as having any partners not sleeping not dying all these are not characteristics that can be attributed to him and he negated it for himself because it goes against his completeness سبحانه وتعالى that is the negation وَأَمَلْ إِثْبَا to ask for the affirmation now is that he affirms for himself every characteristics that shows and implies his completeness سبحانه وتعالى he is completeness سبحانه وتعالى أن الله تبارك وتعالى he said that in two vases in صورة الحشر he said هو الله الذي لا إله إلا هو الملك القدوس السلام المؤمن المهيم العزيز الجبار المتكبر سبحانه وعبما يشيكون هو الله الخالق البارئ المصور اسماء الحسناء يسبح له ما في السبوات والأرض وهو العزيز الحكيم and this is على سبيل التمثيل للحصة this is just an example but it doesn't mean that these are the only two vases that combine between affirmation and negation there are many and they are extensive in the Quran if you look in it you will find it this is just an example then the sheikh was saying فلا عدول لأهل السنة والجماعة عما جاء به المرسلونة فلا عدولة what does the word عدول mean لا ميل لهم there is no deviation when عدول mean is to divert there is no diverting for أهل السنة or there is no deviation for أهل السنة from what عما جاء به المرسلونة for that which the messengers have come with أهل السنة there is no deviation on their side from the path of the messengers they don't divert from it and they don't turn away from it they're on it and they tread on that path and they are following those footsteps of the messengers صلى الله عليه وسلم and they call to that path and that path فإنه الصلاة المستقيم that is the straight path فإنه this is the تعليل the reason why أهل السنة are on that path and they don't divert from that path is because it's the سلاة المستقيم it is the straight path it is the path in which we ask five times a day in every single unit of the prayer every single ركعة we ask him in صورة الفاتح by saying اهدين الصراط المستقيم and also it is mentioned in صورة الأنعام I-153 وأن هذا صراط مستقيم فاتبعوه ولا تتبع السبول فتفرق بكم عن سبيل and this is the path in which we call every single person to and that is the path in which we call every single person to if we want to be from أهل السنة والجباع then the sheikh now went on to saying and explained to us that صراط المستقيم that أهل السنة والجباع are upon what is that صراط المستقيم the sheikh said صراط الذين أنعم الله عليهم من النبيين والصديقين والشهداء والصالحنا this path this path in which أهل السنة والجماع are upon the path which the messengers call to the path which أهل السنة he took and they trade it on this is the path of four types of people it is the path of the prophets النبيونة جمع النبي is a plural of a prophet the second one is أصدقونة صديق is a plural of the word what صديق and it is صغة المبالغة it is the one who is excessive in adhering and following to the message صلى الله عليه وسلم مع كبال الإخلاص لله with complete sincerity for Allah سبحانه وتعالى the third is أشهاداء the martyrs the word شهاداء is plural the singular is شهيد the singular is شهيد and a شهيد a martyr it is the one who is killed whilst on the path of Allah why is a the word شهاداء used for a martyr because the word شهاداء in the Arabic language and it means is to testify or to witness so why is a martyr called a شهاداء the reason the scholars they say is because لأنه مشهود بالجنة because it is testified that he's going to be in jannah for him he's going to testify he has a witness from the that he's going to be in jannah if he dies upon he's going to martyr them and also that the angels are also going to be his witness when he enters paradise and that is the view ابنو الانباري رحمه الله يطق ابنو الانباري also you'd find that if you look at the word the قواميس the قواميس of the Arabic language the dictionaries such as the sign of the Arabic if you look at it you'll find it ابنو الاثير يزبك النهاية في غريب الحريث الأصوء الإمام القرطن يزبك التبكرة في أحوالي الموتى وأمور وأمور الأخرى he also mentioned that the word شهيد إقميد سمي الشهيد شهيدا لأن الله وملايكة شهود له بالجنة and we ask Allah تبارك واتعالا to make us from those people who are upon the سراط المستقين the word سراط sometimes it is attributed to him سبحانه واتعالا and I want you to take this benefit because it's very important the سراط sometimes يضافوا إلى الله it is attributed to Allah as he سبحانه واتعالا he said in Surah Al-An'am وأن هذا سراط مستقيما في التبعو here right now the word سراط الله سبحانه واتعالا so he attributed the path to who to himself and sometimes the path is attributed to the slave as Allah سبحانه واتعالا he said سراط اللذين أن عمت عليهم the path of those you have bestowed your mercy upon so the path here is referred to or it's attributed to the creation of the slaves of Allah and we mentioned who they were they were four types النبيونة وصديقونة وشهدائي وصالحون and the author رحمه الله he starts the first chapter and we will leave that for the next lesson سبحانك الله بحمدك أشهد الله إلا إله إلا الله أستغفرك واتعكم


Architecture itself lasts well beyond the life of an architect, beyond the users who commissioned it, and that architecture itself is very powerful. It shapes people's lives, it shapes people's understanding, understandings of cities for generations to come, and it has the kind of power to even shape one's kind of image of themselves and an image of their own city. So I think architecture as a discipline is extremely powerful. I think our own city here, New York City, is understood as one of the kind of global cities. In that sense, New York City has both a kind of image, a kind of popular image that shapes people's understandings of what the city is and how it works, but it also presents in a way a kind of challenge or a kind of, there's a gap between maybe what we understand New York City to be and how it actually functions and how it actually looks and is experienced. So in that sense, I think people come to New York and they're simultaneously incredibly stimulated but incredibly overwhelmed and frustrated in all the kind of complexities and kind of dynamic qualities of New York. And I think many cities are like that, but they might have a kind of image or a kind of spirit, a kind of quality, but then there are also things that architecture does or doesn't do that maybe shapes their daily lives. And many cities work very hard to, in a sense, close those gaps to kind of many cities aspire to be certain things or that they understand what their kind of image is and they work hard to, in a sense, live up to that. In some cases, New York by being a kind of modern metropolis, it's also known as a kind of tough town and in a way its architecture is a kind of, you know, it has a kind of ruggedness and a kind of, you know, in a way a kind of brutality that, you know, is maybe reflective of some of the kind of toughness of the town as well. So it's both kind of, I like to think of New York City, for example, as both simultaneously modern and barbaric at the same time and that's really the kind of, in a sense, the quality of the architecture and it's very much, in a way, part of the sensibility of being a New Yorker and understanding what we expect from our spaces. The design studio is a place where individual action and individual creativity is measured very directly by the people around them and that is something that I think is really unique to most disciplines that are dealing with a kind of artistic or creative enterprise. Where architecture becomes even more complex than, say, music or a kind of artist studio even though those are demanding and complex disciplines is that there's also this idea that somehow an architect's work can be measured by others very directly in a very public way. Not only you, but me, all educators, but your average person on the street fully expects that he can publicly evaluate a work of architecture and so that creates this enormous kind of dynamic tension between what an individual student is doing in the studio and then how it's measured sort of outside of the studio and that's the other half of the equation. But an architecture studio is very much a kind of paradoxical space in the sense that it is a place where you come and work on your own, you put on your headphones, you put on the blinders and you work but at certain times it's an open space. Your work is on display, it's publicly reviewed and it's part of a community, it's part of a culture of making that you are part of and you have both a kind of personal responsibility a personal stake in the work but you also have some very important public responsibilities you have a responsibility to share your work and be part of that culture and community and that again is I think relative say you've probably visited some of the artist's cubicles on campus and the way in which say the Fine Arts Department is very much about the cubicle each student is given a room on their own and their work is only unveiled at the very end as a fait accompli that's very different from an architecture studio it's both personal and public it's private and public simultaneously it makes it a very unique I think kind of creative space in that sense the kind of patience and understanding and insight almost intuitive insight that I think a teacher has to bring to the equation that allows a kind of personal development to take place those are the best teachers of all who both kind of can demand and kind of in a sense give give an assessment on the spot on a kind of ongoing basis of the work in an evaluative way but also has the kind of intuitive sort of abilities and insight to draw out the kind of best kind of personal qualities of the work the best professors kind of you know surf that wave just before it's kind of falling over and you know with just enough energy behind them to keep it going so that they're not in a sense overwhelming the student with what they think is right and wrong because at the same time they want to nurture that energy of the student and they want to draw out the best ideas of the student so that it can be both a kind of very personal work but also a public work as we were discussing well you know crudely put it's to keep all the plates spinning I mean that's the hardest part it's a lot of it's really you know in that sense it's a form of kind of managing chaos I think is the very best thing and so the dean I think more than anything what I feel I do is really just kind of enable people to think enable people to to kind of find the space to create things that are their own things and that includes both the professors as well as the students that they need to find the time and the space to really invent something completely unique and new and contemporary I think if faculty and students get that sense that that's why they're here that that's the kind of opportunity that they're given then I've been successful


I'm Kathleen Keenan, I'm the Producing Artistic Director of Lost Nation Theatre and it has been my privilege and pleasure to direct Around the World in 80 Days. Around the World in 80 Days is a very well-known, probably one of the most adapted novels of all time by Jules Verne, takes place in 1872 and there have been movies and very big musicals and straight plays and this is an adaptation by Mark Brown which is a kind of vaudevillian, campy, five-actor comic romp version of Around the World in 80 Days so we had to figure out how we were going to tell this amazing epic madcap story with five actors.  You come to watch the actors play and thus the audience is playing along with them. It was so much fun for us as well as the audience because you never know what's going to happen next or where we're going to be because there's only five actors that play multiple different roles. I think that's such a silly fun thing for an audience to see the pit crew come on stage and literally like change us on stage and then transform into a different character. So I play 16 different characters and one of my favorite things about the show is just jumping from one to the next and popping out of a different location in a completely different outfit. I think that's a lot of fun. It's vaudeville style which just that's fun period for audience and performers and it's also just really fun all the different accents that are flying around and just watching one actor transform from one person to another so quickly is really amazing. It just feels like a big magic show. I'm the only actor in the show who's only playing one character actually. I'm playing Philius Fogg. I'm a proper English gentleman with a mysterious background and a lot of money to spare and one day I get in this crazy bet with some other members of my social club that I'm going to travel around the world and I'm going to do it in 80 days or less because I know it's possible. And saving my life was that simply mathematics. My biggest part is I play Aouda who is Philius Fogg and meets her on his journey around the world and she goes along on the journey with them. She continues with them and maybe some sparks start to fly between them. I really like the story between Nick and I, our characters between Fogg and Aouda and I love all of our moments together. I also really love all of the big ensemble scenes when we're all five of us together. Working on the set that Clay has provided, it feels like a circus. It's sort of between all the doors and windows and things that you can pop out of and revolving sets. It seems like it provides ample opportunity for every single travel to be a totally different type of travel. Every aspect of what makes theatre a magical thing is on display in this show. Come see Around the World in 80 Days at Lost Nation Theatre now through July 23rd.


One of the most exciting transit projects for me personally has long been Toronto's Ontario Line Subway, which is a new automated downtown line through Toronto. I've talked about this project a lot of times, including this somewhat questionably produced analysis from literally the day it was announced. Oh, how far we've come. The issue with the Ontario Line is quite literally from the day it was announced. People were suggesting that it probably wasn't going Fortunately, today is the day that I think we can put those fears to rest. And we've learned a ton of new exciting stuff about this transit project. So let's dive in. If you enjoy my videos on transit from Toronto to Zurich to Sydney, consider supporting the channel on Patreon. You can find it at the link down below. So what have we found out today, or yesterday, when you're watching this video? Well, the Ontario Line has been broken into three contracts. The RSSOM contract, the North Civils, and the South Civils. South Civils is the fairly long five and a half kilometer downtown tunnel and the approaches on either side. While North Civils is everything to the north of that, including the elevated portions of the line, the sections running adjacent to go transit on the surface and another tunneled section. The RSSOM contract, also known as rolling stock operations and maintenance, is the trains maintenance facility and other operational things. The idea here was to turn one large project into three smaller projects. That way, a wider variety of companies would be able to come in and bid on the project. Since one large project is more expensive and has more risk than a smaller project, more companies can bid on a smaller project, hopefully driving more competition and a better project. And yesterday, we learned the winners of the two most important of those contracts, the South Civils and the RSSOM contract. Now, you're probably wondering why were these contracts awarded before the North contract? And I believe the reason simply comes down to complexity. The most complex parts of the project need to get moving first so that the entire project can be finished sooner. If you started with the easiest part, which is hypothetically the elevated portions to the north of the line, well then it could be done, but if the rest of the line isn't done, then you can't open the line. So start with the hardest parts first. What's interesting is who won. The construction of the tunnels through the downtown core will be handled by Ferrovial and Vinci, the former of which has built metros in Spain as well as the Farringdon Crossrail Station, which is a very nice station. While the latter is working on the Grand Paris Express project as well as the O-Train expansion in Ottawa, which we covered in a previous video this year. What's so interesting is that the train manufacturer here is quite unexpected. I personally was pretty confident Alstom was going to win this project, given their building trains for a project very similar to the Ontario line just a few hours away in Montreal, the REM. They've also built trains in recent years for the Grand Paris Express and the Sydney Metro, so they kind of seemed like an obvious winner, especially considering their Canadian connections. Siemens was also vying for the project, which makes sense because they're a major rolling stock manufacturer, and they would have been pretty cool to see since they haven't done as many automated metro projects as Alstom in recent years. They've also done the new Via Rail trains and lots of light rail projects in Alberta. But instead, the winner is Hitachi with its driverless metro technology. Now if you're a seasoned RM Transit viewer, this probably isn't a huge surprise, since Hitachi actually has a ton of experience with automated metro systems, like in for example Taipei with the Circle Line. Their train should be a great option for Toronto, and fortunately I haven't heard of any major issues in any of the cities they're currently operating in, which include Copenhagen, Milan, Rome, Brescia, Taipei, and soon Honolulu. Now you might have heard about problems with Honolulu's rail project, but it doesn't really have to do with the trains so much as the other parts of the project. Another thing I should dispel, Hitachi makes a variety of different driverless metro trains, and the ones used on some systems like Copenhagen and the Milan Metro, which we talked about in a recent video, are famously very tiny and cute, kind of similar in size to Vancouver's Canterline. The specifications and trains for the Ontario Line call for much larger vehicles, up to 100 meters long in either 4 or 5 cars, meaning there'll be more kin in size to a traditional Toronto or New York subway car. Hitachi has built driverless trains like this for Rome's line seat, which are probably the best indicator right now of what we might be seeing in the future in Toronto. And I have to say, they are beautiful and very spacious, perfect for the heavy loads and short trips that will likely predominate on the Ontario Line given its many connections. Rome, much like Taipei's Circle Line, and unlike other driverless metro systems from Hitachi, uses overhead wire power, which is something we're also going to see on the Ontario Line, and is quite unique for a metro in North America. I should also mention that WeBuild Group is working with Hitachi to deliver the project, and that's interesting because they also helped deliver the projects in Copenhagen and Milan, which were quite successful. As it turns out, a lot of the same teams that bid successfully on Toronto's regional rail transformation also bid on the Ontario Line project, so we will be seeing their handiwork over there, but not on this project specifically. The team also had an interesting addition though. Singapore's MRT was also working with them. They're not going to be working on this project, but that would have been very interesting and maybe they'll work on the Ontario Line too? That's not a thing, just so you know. With these contracts getting signed soon, I'd say at this point there's basically a 100% chance that the Ontario Line is getting built, and that is a huge deal. The downtown subway bottleneck has existed for literally decades in Toronto, and this line will be popular from day one. And interestingly, it's also the only entirely new subway line that's currently going to be built through a downtown in North America. There are other projects that go through the downtown cores of cities, and there are other projects which are subway projects, but neither create entirely new lines that do both, and I think that's really interesting. Now, this is a huge project not only because it will allow more people to travel into downtown, but also around downtown, and that will allow Toronto City Centre, which is already one of the most populated in North America, to grow even larger. Downtown has traditionally stretched north-south along the young and university subway lines, but now more than ever, it can also stretch east-west along Queen Street and the Ontario Line, and that means a lot more housing and interesting things for people in Toronto to do. It'll also take places that have traditionally been kind of hard to get to from anywhere in the region, like Corktown and Queen and Spadina, and put them within an easy ride on our newest subway. This is also going to be a huge boost for climate resiliency projects like the Portlands, which is to some degree anchored by Toronto's own Canary Wharf at East Harbor, which will connect the Ontario Line with massively improved ghost service and a really large new satellite CBD. This will also be the highest capacity automated metro in North America. The REM comes close, but the Ontario Line's trains will be larger. All stations will also feature platform screen doors, which is a first for Toronto. The UP Express has them, but only at two stations. And I think it's fair to say that by the time the Ontario Line is completed, Toronto will probably have the third best rapid transit system in North America, bested only by New York and Mexico City, which are both actually really good systems despite the problems they do face. It's also going to be incredibly exciting for furthering the transition of Toronto away from being a car-centric city and towards being one where you don't need to live with a car. While also opening up transit as an option for so many more trips and so many more people, helping to add more people who will advocate for better transit service and coverage. I'm excited, but this is just the beginning for this massive project. Thanks for watching.


Let's do it. What's going on, everyone? Sam here with late in sports cards. We are ripping 22, 23, Puneet, the Don Ross Optic Passable Hobby, six box, half case break, number 11, random team style. There's a look again at your random results. As always, you can find these on the website under the results tab, as well as the link in chat. You guys wanna join the fun on Optic today. You have four half casers to do so, random team style, still 19 to go on number 23. That's breaking a little bit later. 22 is sold out, so let's get going on this guys. Here we go.  The rookies, Jaden and Ivy, the pistons, Caruso. Not really, I mean the photons technically counts as short print, but they're a little easier to pull this year. Oh, there's gonna be a dice roll on these by the way. One, two, three, left, four, five, six, right for these all stars, unless it's a gold or lower. In that case, we'll do its own random. It's gonna be a four, gonna go to the right, so that'll go to the right with the raptors in Grant Hill, or pistons in Grant Hill. That'll go to the right, pistons in Grant Hill. Rollins, lights out, Ant-Man, Tatum. Packs are weird, dude. Packs are like upside down. Hello, Yannis, nice one there. The Bucks, Malik Beasley. Elite Dominators, Booker, the Suns. Pink Velocity to 79, that's Spencer Dinwitty for the nuts. Hello, Starr Gazing, Anthony Edwards, Peter McConnell, Christian Brown, Rookie. There's Lyme Green, Kyle Larrick to 149 for the E. There you go, Mayan, Cade, Johnny Davis, all stars will go to the right. Hello, Harrison Barnes, Kat. Hello, Jake Laravia, Rookie, nice one there for the Gris, Jake Laravia, nice and dangerous. Lyme Green, Donovan Mitchell for the Cabs to 149. Orange, John Collins to 199 for the Hawks. John Collins, now let me sort. 10 of 10, Dyson Daniels, Gold, Rookie, Optic, Autographs. There we go, Pelicans, nice one, New Orleans. That's going to Jeremy H. Let's go Jeremy, congrats buddy, very nice. Jeremy H with the Gold, Dyson Daniels, the Marder Rosen and Malcolm Brogdon. Jaylen Brown, Contavia's called the Wolf Pope. Jaylen Brown, Peter Hawke, question mark, getting Watson, Stargazing, Luca, Wendell Moore, reigning threes, Buddy Heald. Buddy Heald always gets a reigning threes card. Hello, lights out, Anthony Edwards. Bring him back to the A, dude. We won't boo him. We won't boo our own players in Atlanta. Victor Oladipo-Hallo and Drew Holliday, last pack of box one. O shape reset two, 90-not for the Pacers. James Wiseman as a piston. So it looks like these do account for some of the mid-season trades, which is kind of cool too. Then Woody's a net, that was Wiseman as a piston. So we should have a couple other ones too. Fon, you don't get to use them. You think so? LaRavia. Oh, look who it is, I've got Vroom Vroom. David Arati, 299. Dominator's auto, four is the Rizzleys. Lights out, Lamella. See, you can scroll down. Yeah, so sometimes when you, for some reason, I don't know why. But when you minimize them now, it should be fun. Okay. I don't know why. It does not threes effective. All right, cool. I was having no idea. I'm breaking it. I didn't break it. I fixed it. I fixed it. Bye, Donnie. Bye. Hello, Terence Van. Clips. That is kind of odd. Cause they'll be yelling at us tomorrow for some sort of. Right, Christian Brown. Orange to 199, TJ Warren for the Suns. Got his back on the Suns now. Bubble Goat, TJ Warren. Photon, James Wiseman. Nice one there for the Pistons. Those are a little bit more common this year. That's a four or some saying. Yeah. Boyan, McDonovich, Hollow. The Hawks. Bogey. EJ Griffin. Basketballs, Lori Markinen. Lights out, LeBron James. That is red to 99. Nice one there for the Lakers. Lakers. And Sean has us watching the news. I didn't know that. Hollow, Evan Mobley, the news. How are you, Evan Mobley? It's on you. Hollow, Jordan Clarkson. Gordon Hayward.  Stop making us watch the news. What's up, Dean? Dean. Dean, you got the Kings in this one. Pretty solid, actually. Palo, there we go. Dino. Mar and Dillon Brooks. No, not Dillon Brooks. Mar and Devin Booker. Eggs, Benedict, Cumberbatch, Matheryn. Orange, Pat Pab is the member of the Magic to 199. There we go. That's the one. That is the one right there. Hollow, Stargazing, Yannis. Does he really love us? Huh? For like, he got traded and then like released. Basically, reigning threes, Trey. Let's go, about to hop in a few months. Let's go, Dean. Go, Dean. Go, Dino. Kai Tai Washington. Dean, I'll have your boxes out tomorrow, by the way. I saved a couple empty boxes for Dean. Nice. Marjan Bochamp. I'll have them out tomorrow for you, buddy. Oh, yeah. What's up, brother? Trevor Keels, there's a blue. Ian, you have the nuggets, Ian. The nuggets. 249, Palo Ari for the heat. You have the Denver Nuggets. You got it, you got it, buddy. Sorry, sorry for the delay on that one. It's been, I've been so busy, dude. Chillin', man. How you doing? Couple more cheered spots coming in. That's it. Oh, boy. Again, guys, we got 19 to go. I'll have your Facebook and Tweet, if you don't mind when you get the chance. Yeah, no problem, Ian. You got it. Thank you for taking a spot, buddy. I appreciate that. That's awesome. Next box, good luck, everybody. Isaiah Molybden, there's a red Devon Booker, 249, excuse me, elite dominators for the suns. Suns. Hello, Jaylen Brown, Future Hawk. Where's Keegan-Marriott, Tim? Hopefully in here somewhere. Jaylen Williams, there's a J-Dubb. Green, Grayson Allen, the Tripper. It's a 149 for the Bucks. Markel Fultz. Farkel Moltz. Hello, going to the right with Julius Randall. On the All Star. Bari Walker, Stargazing. Chet, or Chet Rookie. I have, actually. I've been doing the moments for it, Vaughn. I've been doing the moments. Hello, Ochaig Bajie, for the Jazz, Rookie. I've been doing the moments for it. That's been kind of the grind right now. Nemhard, injured Nemhard Rookie. There's red to 99 out, Horford, for the Celtics. But I've only gotten a couple of them that I haven't played a lot recently. Since like last week, since the weekend. Like Wesley, nice. Marjan Boatchamp on the Black Velo. It's a 39, 10 of 39. Let's go Bucks. Milwaukee is gonna be Michael T. Let's go Michael. Michael. That's awesome, dude. Marjan Boatchamp. That's so sick.  Let's go. God, that's awesome. Let's go. KJ. KJ. Hello, Damonte Graham. Damonte Graham's on the spurs now? When was Damonte Graham on the spurs? When did that happen? Somebody enlightened me. What? When you were asleep. I guess, dude. I have no idea. I would have still said he was on the pelican. No idea he was on the spurs. Ooh, redemption. Is Oseman Zhang, rated Rookie. Signatures hollow. That's going to the Thunder. Jesus T. With the Thunder. Congrats, buddy. Nice one there. Jesus T. Thunder. Again, guys, 19 to go. Let me drop you that link one more time. Josh Richardson for Damonte Graham. Wow. Yeah, really good stuff coming out of Optic. Optic's been clean this year for sure. Harry Eason Rookie. Yeah, Forrest was pulling some absolute heat and I mean that's pretty big good start right there. Black velocity Marjan Boatchamp. I feel it in my bones. Hello, Ant-Man. I love buying Optic stuff on the secondary market too. Hollow trade jump. This is such like a bread and butter product of buying like vet red to 99 for like a buck a piece. Get ready boys. This man, Jeng. Orange Zach Levine. The 199 out, what's happening here? Shawn's concerned though. Shawn's real in there. What he should be. What? I'm terrified. It's going to do it for Saturday. For Saturday? It's what's listed because I haven't scheduled it yet. No. Yeah, I guess what you're bringing. You are probably the perfect person to be breaking this product. All right, give me a sport. Football. It's not going to be, it's not scheduled yet. But it's just listed. Yeah. 2011 NT football? Yeah. What? Yeah. What dude? Random team break listed for Saturday night. Oh man, 230 a spot, dude. That's why we came in here. We were like, same's not the lowest Saturday. That's like the first year I truly started like really, really collecting cards, dude. Oh my God. Al Horford to 79, pink Velocity. Oh my God. When we pull Leonard Hankerson RPA, it's going to be so much fun. It's going to be so much fun. That would be AJ Green, Julio Jones, Cam Newton, Andy Dalton, Colin Kaepernick. It's a really good class. Marco Murray. Yeah, there's a lot of good names. It's a really solid class. Yeah. Oh wow. Oh wow. Oh man. Oh boy. Same's not the lowest. I'm still ready, dude. Same's like, is there a time machine to just go to Saturday? Yeah, honestly. You have to bring a stove. You've got to go to Saturday. Oh man, that's going to be nuts, dude. Rich just texted, just like, it's like, check out Saturday. Rich texted, he was like, what do you think of Saturday? And I was like, this schedule, what do you mean, what do I think of Saturday? When he never gets a text like that. And he was like, yeah, the breaks. And I looked and I was like, oh man. Lights out to Marco Rosen. Oh man. I saw that had to do a triple take. EJ Liddell, there's a photon, KCP. 2011 did have some, it's so insane. It's a good, it's really solid overall. Because then you got like Von Miller, Pat P, J.J. Watt. Like there's a lot of like names on there. 2015, if Todd Gurley had panned out, he ended up with 2015, I think would take it. Yeah, I think so. Just cause you have Winston, you have Mariota. I know that they've peed it out some now. Caleb Houston, I'm already pooper. Exactly, you have a Marys Cooper, Tyler Lockett. Yeah, that's a solid one. He's a big sleeper from that class. Yeah. Jabari Smith, the rookies for the Raptors. Oh man, I'm so excited to go. I'm so excited for Saturday. Oh man. March on Bo-Champ. March on Bo-Champ. Kyle's live on drip. Kyle is live on drip. We've got another Caloco Quintin Grimes, QG on the Black Velocity. You guys know the Optic Velocity? Q39. Every $50 spent on Optic basketball is one entry into a drawing to win a Steph Curry signed jersey. It's pretty big, dude. Every 50 bucks spent on Optic. So Optic box is six entries. Really? Every hobby box is six entries. Yep. Think 13, yeah. Hello, T-Man. Tyree Southwood, dude. 2011 NZ. Yeah, that's crazy. God, dude. Wow. Good God. Jalen Williams, this is Scotty Pippin Jr. Pink Velocity, nice one there, $2.79. I could throw that in the recap. Kenneth Lofton Jr. Orange Buddy Hill to $1.99 for the Pacers. Hello, Dremond. Aaron Wiggins. Got basketball on tonight too, dude. Such a good, ooh, is that a green? Come on, baby. Green, Malachi Branum, five of five. Rated rookie auto going to the Spurs. Let's go Spurs. San Antonio, Kyle R. Congrats, Kyle. Good Lord, man. This stuff has been heat so far today, guys. This stuff has been so much fun. Got a green Branum now. Again, that is going to be number five of five. We'll get that straight into a mag. Great start with the Bo Champ as well. Sean dropping that link. We're down to 18 to go on 13 now.  There's some serious cards to be had in this. Serious cards to be had in this. Nikolay Jovic. Rating threes. Hello, Zach Levine for the bowls. Another potential future hawk. Jayne Ivey, Rated Rookie. There's a wrench, everkeels, two at 99. Nice one there for the nicks on the rookie. Get through that and reach out to. And I would say any rookie caller you could search today, you could throw in. Hello, Boyan Bogdanovich. Bogy for the hawks and Gary Payne. Potential trade chip for Zach Levine. Boyan Bogdanovich. All right, more spots coming in for some of the later optic breaks as well. So thank you guys there. That's going to be a lot of fun. Definitely excited. 12s to go on that honors break as well. We're down to 18, 23, 26, 24. 26, 24. Bye, Forrest. What's up? Hey. I'm going to stop now. I'm not going to ask you anymore, then. Tell me about a card you got. I don't care. Oh, nice. Higley. What's up, Higley? Jayne Ivey, Rated Rookie. Poison Ivey. Does he answer the door or does he? Nice lime green Chet Holmgren. What is going on? Good Lord. It's a 149. Let's go. Congrats on that. You can make this one. It's a 149. The Chet. What's telling you, dude? This stuff is loaded. Is that going to be a gold? That's another gold. Gold bottle palette coming up, maybe? Gold. Andrew Nemhard. Six of 10. Rookie optic auto. Paul En and the Pacers. Let's go, baby. Chill out, Sam. Stuff is loaded. Chill out. We got all night, dude. All the bigger, bigger cards in here. Come on. Nemhard on the Rookie optic gold auto. Let's go, dude. The manner of this guy. I think just finished breaking it. I know. I knew it when you let you get out the door and he's already hammering it. Keegan Murray Rookie. The poor dude in gold is. That's way there, I'm a poor dude. I'm going to tell everybody to be like, come and chat tomorrow when you get in. To be like, you know, pull something better. Hello, Deer and Fox. Swipe up. We had some monsters. Oh, yeah, dude. I've seen a forest-fold absolute bangers this morning. Keegan Murray.  I'm not going to be shocked. God, that's going to be nasty. So good, dude. I might be in chat. I'll see you guys. Bye, forest. Have a good night, brother. Chris Paul. Do you want to leave light on? Hello. Turn it off. We're going to take a nap.  Basketball is Devin Booker. Jeremy Sohan, rookie. Raining three is Ant-Man. Monta Morris. Hello, James Harden. Nice one there. There you go. Tyrese Martin. Nice. Jeremy Sohan on the basketball's insert rookie. Grats on that. Spurs doing well now, man. Spurs doing really well. Picking up that Brannum. And picking up A. Jeremy Sohan. Hollow going to the right with Levine. Kuzma on the throwback threads. Nice. Hollow, Draymond. I got a new flavor of Mountain Dew at the gas station today. Purple thunder. Really? I wonder what that's going to be all about. Jalen Williams. The J will, not J dub. The other Jalen Williams. Oh, did it? How do you like it? Hollow, Kwyler. Literally walking out the door. Is that one day? It came from last night? Yeah, well, we already did. Yeah, you have to let me know how it goes. Send me some pictures if you take some pictures of the cards, too. Terrence Mann to 149. Green for the clips. Yeah, I think that's what I'm saying. Bagging out pictures of it. Yeah, I got a couple big lots in from Facebook. I just got to get up on eBay now. I sold a bunch. Sold a decent amount of stuff recently. So I got to get that stuff out tomorrow. Tatum and Devante and Ram. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Oh, man. Thank you, Vaughn taking a spot. Ian taking two spots. Arnie taking a spot. Thank you guys so much. Appreciate that. Max taking a spot in moments best tomorrow. Very nice. What are we down to now? 14. 14. 14 to go on number 13. Very nice, guys. Thank you. Oh, man. Look who just entered the chat. Oh, man. Oh, what a troublemaker we've got here. I haven't seen this dude in a minute. Got Sean here with me, Kyle. What up, Kyle? What up, Kyle? Hello, Cam Thomas. Oh, boy. Where have you been, dude? Working. Hello, Yanis. Kyle. What's up, brother? I was in shock. That's so funny. Peyton Watson. How many goes you want? You think I'm playing? Oh, man. Max Christie. Wendell Moore Jr. Pink Velocity to 79. Rookie for the T-Wolves. Very nice. Let's go, baby. What's up? I know, yeah, for sure. I'll come in every now and then, though. There's Hollow Lights out, Donovan Mitchell. I know that devil's game was rough. He was there, too. Oh, really? I was there, yeah. Hello, reigning threes, Dirk. Johnny Davis. Wisconsin Badger Legends. Pink Velocity, Rashawn Holmes to 79. For the Kings. Pink Velo. Hello, Dallin Terry, Raider Rookie for the Bolts. Terry. Terry, Terry Rozier. The monster is so far. Four mags all the way, dude. I see it being up close and personal.  Oh my god. That sucks, man. Nice. Kendall Brown, Orange to 199. Raider Rookie for the Pacers. He passed that in, too. Lights out. Shray. There's got so much optic tonight. It's so awesome. There's so much stuff that we're going to pull. Redemption. Blake Wesley, Raider Rookie signatures. Going to the Spurs. Nice one there, Spurs. Congrats on that one there, Spurs. Wow, Miles taking six spots in number 13. Let's go Miles. And taking a tiered spot. Blake Wesley, going to the Spurs. Thanks, Miles. Appreciate you, buddy. Wendell Moore. So that should bring us down to eight now, I believe. If I'm correct. Bari Smith, Rookie. Orange, Paul George to 199. And Alfred Cheng June. Down to eight guys, eight to go on the next one. Michael S taking a high-end honors mixer spot. Chris Duarte. That'll be a fun one at the end of the night, too, guys. That's something to definitely look forward to. Got Fulman at the end of the night as well. Rounding us completely out, Walker Kessler. The Rookies, Paolo. Kendrick Nunn. Kendrick Nunn, yeah. Business. There you go. I haven't used that today, too. I know. That's a double whammy, huh? Kauai Leonard to 149 on the lime green for the clips. And Kauai at base. Let's do ourselves a quick recap here, everybody. Oh, Colored Rookies, thank you. So Colored Rookies, we had a Kendall Brown to 199. Wendell Moore to 79. Trevor Kiehl to 99. Scotty Pippen Jr. to 79. David Roddy, gold, Dyson Daniels to 10. Osemein Zhang for the thunder. Blake Wesley for the spurs. We had now our magged cards, Chet Holmgren, lime green. Bye, Bryson. To 149 for the thunder. We had Andrew Nemhard, gold to 10. For the Pacers, Marjan Bochamp to 39. Black Velocity Rookie for the bucks. And Green, Malachi Branham, five of five. Rated Rookie Auto, going to the spoys. That'll do it for the break, guys. Thanks again for the fill. Oh, man, Kyle took two spots. Let's go. Coming up next, we've got number 12. So thanks again, guys.