Hey guys, how you doing? This is Rich from Rich City Live. Another pic that I wanted to bring to your attention and I got to give it up to MC because she's just like AYTU, AYTU, AYTU is AYTU on the NASDAQ, AYTU Bioscience. It was at $1.36 up 4%. Now at $1.48 up 8% after market. I think that they could fly on Monday. They could go much higher because the US right now is really focused on test kits. These guys are working in the test kit business. Look at this news right here. ITU Bioscience Inc. AYTU, a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on commercializing novel products that address significant patient needs announced today that it extended its distribution rate to commercialize the clinically validated and commercially used coronavirus 2019 COVID-19 IgG IgM rapid test. The test has been licensed from LB Resources, Limited, a Hong Kong corporation. The COVID-19 IgG IgM rapid test is intended for personal use and delivers clinical results between two and ten minutes at the point of care. This amendment expands ITU's commercial rights and grants ITU the right to distribute and commercialize the COVID-19 test in North America. That is a game changer. Game changer. Specifically including the United States, which obviously is in big need right now, Canada and Mexico. The company expects to pursue expedited regulatory clearance of the product with Health Canada and COFFEBRIS, Commission, Federal, Para, La, Protection, Contra, RIGOS, Sanitarios, the regulatory agencies in Canada and Mexico respectively. Josh Dizbrough, Chief Executive Officer of ITU Bio and Science commented, we have to be progressive in doing our part in combating the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We need to ensure the screening is available across North America and providing broad access to screening tests has to be among our highest priorities as we collectively fight the coronavirus outbreak. With COVID-19 now designated as a global pandemic, we believe we should expand our efforts to assist healthcare providers with faster point-of-care detection. The COVID-19 IgG backslash IgM rapid test is a solid phase immunochromatographic assay used in the rapid qualitative and differential detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to the 2019 novel coronavirus in human whole blood, serum or plasma. This point-of-care test has been validated in 113 patient clinical trial and is CE marked. Huge news, big news, ITU Bioscience Inc. I'm not gonna get into all of it. Do your research, do your due diligence. If you like this video, smash the like button, comment down below, share the video everywhere. I want to know do you think this is the next big winner? I'm gonna show you something. In the last three months, the stock has gone bonkers. I mean, it's been as high as what? What's like they're high here? I know it's higher than this. I think it's been as high as four or five bucks, guys. It says $2.99, but I know it's been higher than this. Probably finished the day at $2.99, but intraday, it's been as high as four or five bucks. Like this thing has screamed. Came back down, created a buying opportunity, and I think right now is a good time to pick it up. And that's why I think it's going up. And it went up 8% aftermarket on Friday, which is a good sign that we could see it explode on Monday. Keep it on your watch list. Keep it on your radar. We bring you the winners and we bring them to you first. I2 Bioscience. Test kits, two to 10 minutes, Canada, United States, Mexico. Your boy, Richard, must be live.  It's true. It's your boy, and I'm out. Peace.


Live from Miami Beach, Florida, it's theCUBE. Covering Veeamon 2019, brought to you by Veeam. Welcome back to Miami everybody. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. We go out to the events and we extract the signal from the noise. This is day one of Veeamon 2019. The Cube's third year covering Veeam. First year we're in New Orleans, last year, Chicago. Very cool and hip location here at the Fontainebleau Hotel. I'm Dave Vellante with my co-host Peter Burris. Colin Châtellier is here, he's the manager of storage and compute for Europe at Rabobank. Colin, thanks for coming on theCUBE. Good to see you. Good to be here. So tell us about Rabobank. What are you guys all about? Okay, so Rabobank's obviously a bank. We have two main focuses. First of all, we're trying to be the biggest high street bank in the Netherlands, biggest retail bank in the Netherlands. And we've got, what, 7.3 million customers there in an adult population of 14 million. So that's not bad. And secondly, the Netherlands is only a certain size and we're not going to grow it that much. So the biggest part of our new business is international. And that's, the bank is all focused on providing food and agriculture expertise, loans, FX, spot work, anything that can help people or help businesses improve their efficiencies and get more food from spade to plate. So what are some of your, the drivers in your business that are affecting your technology strategy? Drivers in the business, I guess, again, we've got two different parts of the bank, I should probably explain. So two years ago, we brought the idea of those two different parts of the bank together. Now, that's the retail. The international. The retail, the international. And if you think about it, the international is all wholesale work, the retail is all high street banking. So the retail, those people really want to see their data. They want to see it on the web. They're checking balances, transferring pocket money to their kids. And if that doesn't happen, you know, that's a tragedy and embarrassing. So we can't be responsible for that. As a result, one of our watch words is always on. So we need to make sure that data is always available and we need to make sure that systems are always up for them. Part of that really is, you know, occasionally it won't always be on. So you need to be able to recover very quickly and getting a product that's simple to use for recovery and fast to recover was really part of that strategy. That's where Veeam came in. So when you had to merge those two sort of IT operations, obviously there was more than the data protection side of things, but talk generally about what the challenges were, but then specifically about the data protection piece. Okay, so bringing two IT departments together, of course, gives you a choice. Am I going to use product A or product B or sometimes product A and B and not C? That gave us an opportunity to really do something that's not that common, I think, in the backup world and introduce a bit of churn. Especially in retail environments, we have monthly backups. Sorry, especially in wholesale, I mean, we have monthly backups. And those monthly backups go for anything from one year to 10 years. So trying to get away from a backup product where there's 10 years worth of legacy there to recover, very tricky. But bringing the two banks together gave us that opportunity to say, okay, well, we'll invest in a move. And we really put a whole series of criteria together to try and figure out which one we were going to use. We moved from VMware and Hyper-V. We're moving everything to VMware. And we have a number of other backup products, which I won't name because we're moving away from them. And Veeam was the winner there. Now why? We needed something that would recover quickly. We needed something that would scale to the enterprise. We have 13,000 VMs being backed up today. We needed something that we could deploy reasonably quickly and without too much effort. And actually when we deployed Veeam, we started off in November last year. By the end of January, we were finished. Now there were a couple of 1,000 VMs already on. Oh, I'm sorry. So it took it two months to effectively move out an old backup infrastructure and move in a new one? Sort of correct, yes, for dailies. For monthlies, we haven't touched that yet. So we decided to just bite off one chunk at a time.  We have at least 10 years, yeah. Okay, so, all right, but still. That's pretty quick. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Now what about cloud, every conference you go to, you see the sign, cloud data management, it's everything's cloud, cloud, cloud. It used to be in your business, the financial services business cloud was an evil word. Is it still, what's your cloud strategy and how does data protection fit in? Well, we have a strategy of public cloud first. That's a lot easier to do for new applications than it is for existing applications, of course. So it tends to be that the existing applications are waiting for a technical refresh or waiting for an application rewrite. And new applications are going straight into the cloud. How we're protecting that, that's at the moment most of our data is held on-prem. Whereas a lot of our applications which can just be easily refreshed and republished is held in the cloud. So those guys, the DevOps teams are performing their own backup, their own recovery. And so, are you able to sort of, for the on-prem stuff, are you trying to sort of make that cloud like sort of substantially mimic the cloud so you're able to do that? Peter, you're always talking about bringing the cloud experience to your data. Is that something that you're able to do or is that just sort of good marketing taglines? It's something that we are just starting to do again. So a year ago, we had a private cloud that was just on the verge of being deployed. But we decided then that strategically we'd mothball that and encourage everybody to go to public cloud and not confuse them with two different choices. That's proving a little difficult. So one of the things that we find is that development teams who are currently in the cloud can develop things with software-defined infrastructure. But when they try and interface with the data or with some of the systems that are on-prem, then they come to a dramatic halt and they have to wait for the normal on-prem processes to kick through. So what we're looking at doing now is we just started a new process, a new project to create an on-prem proof of concept, on-prem cloud that will interact with the off-prem cloud and give the cloud-like experience. So we'll see. So you have that challenge of Agile meets waterfall and now you're trying to create some kind of equilibrium or really trying to modernize the on-prem? What's the strategy there? Well, I don't think it's Agile meets waterfall. I think it's DevOps meets traditional process. And yeah. Okay, but how are we going to do it, you say? Yeah, yeah. Well, I guess what I'm going to do is are you going to find sort of a common ground or are you really going to try to drive that sort of DevOps mentality into the legacy process? We'll continue to have a traditional or legacy depending on what you want to call it, environment there. But we'll also have a software-defined infrastructure environment on-prem. If this proof of concept works, it's being built at the moment or being designed at the moment based on a VMware stack. What role will containers and microservices play in terms of facilitating that transformation? At the moment, we have containers on-prem which are coming with applications, but we don't have a specific container platform which we're offering as a service on-prem. That's just where this container's off-prem, of course, in our Azure cloud. Right, right. So for the on-prem stuff, what does that do for you and where do you see that going? The containers? Yeah. At the moment, we have a policy of not providing a container service on-prem. Oh, sorry, I heard wrong, sorry. Yeah, okay, so that's not a direction that you're going currently. No, but it may be because we're feeling our way forward, I think. But as you think about, for example, banks and financial services companies have been at the vanguard of a lot of digital business practices because your core offering is data and how it gets used. So is your overall business starting to rethink this notion of backup and restore from something that's just there to make sure the data's available to becoming an essential strategic capability that can span between the two modes as you're describing, but a common approach to making sure the data assets aren't compromised by vendor relationships, by application development styles, by locations, is that, are you thinking in those terms of a federated approach to ensure the services on the data that you need? Okay, well that was a very long question. Yes. But it's quite a short answer. Yes, we're thinking about it. No, we haven't done it yet. But I think you're absolutely right. One of the problems could be, for example, we deploy in, I don't know, as your AWS Google and we fall out with one of those cloud providers and we try and move our backup data from provider A to provider B. Is it transportable? Have we got the same policy that's being deployed in each of them?  You want to recreate that problem that you got with those 10 years of monthly backups with the new stuff too. Exactly, yeah, yeah. We've already made that mistake. What are the other challenges? Well, but you made it for a good reason. That was the state of the technology at the time and you had to have hardened processes and that was how you did it 10, 15 years ago. One of the other problems, the challenges that you hear from when we talk to financial services organizations is if their data exists, their data companies, as Peter said, but their data exists in hardened silos, again, for good reason. You had to protect that data. It was mission-critical. Regulatory reasons. Family rules type of stuff. Now, as you transform it to the so-called digital business, everybody wants access to that data. And so you've got that tough balancing act. So is that obviously a challenge for you? How are you dealing with that challenge? And data protection generally was unique to each of those silos. So how are you thinking about data protection going forward in terms of busting those silos? Well, I don't think we've ever had silos of data protection. I think our data protection has been uniform. Across the two banks, of course. Yeah, right. So now we've brought them together again. We have, what, different retention characteristics, different ways of using a product. But over the last year and a half, two years, we've pretty much brought in the same processes. But I don't think that any application on-prem or any that will be on the private cloud or the on-prem cloud will have anything different. It will use the same product, the same processes, and perhaps have more access by the development teams, to be able to fire off their own backups at the right time. You're talking about from a data protection perspective. And then potentially other things, like microservices or containers over time. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, what's happening at the show here? Things you've learned, anything you've seen that's exciting you? Anything announcements? Well, it's early days, isn't it? It's early days. So I think the best thing for the show so far was last night when it going on the boat, meeting some of the other execs and sharing some experiences with them. I think one of the things I always think is the best practice comes from worst experience. And I don't want to have all that worst experience myself. I want to mind it from everybody else. So I think you can learn more in an hour in a social situation. You can perhaps in two hours in the conference room. So what are you hearing from your peers? What are they doing? Some of the challenges that they're facing? This digital business stuff, is it real? How are they dealing with it? Okay, my peers. I think what they're feeling is that the traditional backup solution, the traditional backup providers are just not quick enough on their feet. Agile in a real sense rather than a... Quotes the marketing sense, yeah. And I think the traditional providers tend to be less grateful for the business, perhaps. You know, I heard about the number of new customers that Veeam are getting today. But they seem to give a lot of attention to those new customers. Now deploying 13,000 VMs in a relatively short period of time, we needed a lot of help from Veeam to overcome the obstacles as we hit them. And they were there when we needed them. And you know, that makes a difference I think because especially when you're protecting your data and you need to be able to restore that data, you need a partner, not a vendor. So it's as much the relationship as the technology is what I'm hearing. I don't think we would get into bed with a vendor who wasn't a partner as well. Oh, in many respects, it's almost like Veeam understands how to solve the problem and their technology is a way of doing it easily and cheaply and reliably. Exactly, yeah, yeah. I want to follow up on that because, you know, some of the large companies I can infer who you're talking about, they might have big established direct sales forces, meat-eating guys that are in the field that just go belly to belly. Veeam, all channel, all indirect, how are they successfully partnering with you in a ways that the other guys may not be? Would that type of go-to-market model? So we used a company called ProAct, a reseller, to buy into Veeam. I guess Veeam trained them up well because they had all the information at their fingertips and they represented us in the negotiation with Veeam. So it took away perhaps some of the conflict that you'll get in an early situation. And then when we needed the direct help from Veeam, Veeam stepped up to the board and started giving that direct help and not cut out the reseller, but the reseller wasn't needed anymore at that point. And that was help from a technology standpoint or a business term standpoint or both? Technology, yeah. Just overcoming the problems. A big organization has got a lot of networks, a lot of LANs, VLANs, and we need to be able to punch holes through those VLANs. So it's quite interesting to be able to be told up front where we need to punch. Make this work. Yeah, great. All right, Colin, well thanks very much for coming on theCUBE, it was great having you. Give you final thoughts on Miami, you're coming in from out of town and you got the tour last night on the boat, what'd you think and impressions of the conference? Well Miami, first of all, it looks like a nice place to live. As we cruised past all of those gigantic homes, I didn't notice anyone in them, so perhaps one's going cheap. The conference, it looks good. I'm always surprised by how big it is. It's my second event. And yeah, they've got a hell of a lot of customers and seem to be loyal customers as well. Nobody has a bad thing to say. Were you here in Chicago last year? I wasn't, I was here in New Orleans. New Orleans, yeah, two years ago. All right, great. Well thanks very much for coming on theCUBE, I appreciate it. All right, keep it right there, we'll be back with our next guest. You're watching theCUBE live from Veeamon 2019. Right back.


rently contacted you. That is one of the platforms to do that. It is imperative that this Parliament, this chamber, has that opportunity to raise those issues so that the Scottish Government can talk to the UK Government about those issues. Oliver Mundell I agree, but, like his colleague before, Mr Paterson, I think that it is about proportionality. It is about how much time do we want to spend talking round and round on the same issues without making any positive suggestions or taking the debate substantially forward, because that is essentially the same debate that we have been having on the EU.  It is not taking matters forward. We have the same minister coming to this chamber to answer the questions on each of the things, and, as people have said before, it is getting a bit like Groundhog Day, but I will make some progress. Stuart Stevenson raised an interesting point about ignoring his party. I think that here in Scotland people want the relationship to change. He said that the result shows nothing, that you cannot read anything into the question that was on the ballot paper. It does not answer lots of things, but it shows that people in Scotland want our relationship with the EU to change. Instead of talking about the benefits of allowing Scottish courts— 38 per cent, if you want to intervene, I would be happy. Have to close, please, Mr Mundell. Over a million voters voted to leave in Scotland. I know—I have said before—that the SNP wants to airbrush them out of history, but that is more voters than putting their cross next to your party leader on the second vote list. You must close now, Mr Mundell. So, in short, what I want is rather than hearing that the EU is a utopia and that everything that the EU ever did was great and that it has a divine right to exist, I want to hear from Scottish Government ministers— Mr Mundell, you must close. I want to hear from Scottish Government ministers what their detailed plans are for justice. Mr Mundell, when I say that you must close, I would ask you to please close. I call Mike Russell for up to 11 minutes, please, Mr Russell. Can I start by commending Oliver Mundell on his speech? I do so genuinely, because I think that he has lifted this debate certainly beyond the depths that he had sunk into on his own benches, because I think that he has addressed the key issue. I want to be quite genuine about this. I am a passionate believer in the EU, and I will not resolve from that just as I acknowledge his position in saying before the vote that he wished to leave. That is at advance on some of his colleagues who now are rewriting history on their position on this matter. I am a solid believer in the EU, and if he had been in his chamber to hear me argue for it before the election, he would have heard the same thing after the election. We have had half a century of peace in Europe. I think that that is a remarkable achievement. It has prevented war. It has been economically beneficial for the whole of these islands. You only have to look at the position of the UK before accession and the position afterwards to see the remarkable effect that it had, and that cannot be denied. It has been an enormously positive force in terms of social protection and human rights, and it can continue to be so. I could go through all those advantages, and we would be happy to do so in a debate, but I also want him to acknowledge. I am dealing seriously with his points, and I think that he would need to be dealt with seriously. He has to acknowledge, and there will be a difference between us, that the democratic imperative that this Government is responding to in terms of the Scottish electorate. The Scottish electorate voted 62 to 38 to stay, so we are responding not just to the mandate that we had in the election in May, in a manifesto in which we specifically said that Scotland being removed from the EU against its will would be a matter to trigger or could potentially trigger an independence referendum, but we are also responding to the mandate in the referendum and we are responding to this chamber in preparing the options. We will come to this chamber with that preferred option. The First Minister has already said so. We will bring that option, but it has to be informed by debate, discussion and research, and that is one of the purposes of those debates. Oliver Mundell. We might also accept that the SNP manifesto talked about a material change in circumstances, but was it not also implicit when Nicola Sturgeon toured round the television studios and has commented several times on that issue, that where there is a material change in circumstances, there also needs to be a material change in support, in the fundamental level of support for the proposition of independence, to have a mandate here in this Parliament to take that forward? Michael Russell. We have not yet brought to this chamber an independence referendum. If we bring that independence referendum to this chamber the independence referendum bill, we will have to confront that issue of support. However, the manifesto, specifically referred to the issue of Scotland being—it is rather difficult to have a serious debate if one member sitting behind Mr Mundell keeps waving his hands in the air. It would be very useful if we could address the serious points that Mr Mundell has raised to which I am responding, because he has raised the level of this debate, and I pay tribute to him for that. If that bill comes to the chamber, then we will be able to discuss that. However, it was in the manifesto that there is a commitment to honour the decision of the Scottish voters, and this chamber has asked us to address these issues. That is why we are having these debates. I do rather regret that the tone has still been from the Tories while we bother from those debates, because the debates are vitally important. We would have been criticised had we not come to this chamber and offered to this chamber the opportunity to consider the key devolved areas, to debate and discuss them, to put them in the context of Brexit and to make sure that we understood—I understood—taking forward the task of representing Scotland in those negotiations. I understood the issues that members were concerned with. I am worried this afternoon, because it appears that the mainstream voice of the Tories on justice is not Mr Mundell, who spoke very well, but it is now Margaret Mitchell, and that should certainly worry every member of the chamber. Margaret Mitchell was the original Brexiteer before the election and is now the Brexiteer who is speaking for the Tories on those matters. However, I think that our councils in terms of justice may prevail, because we have to recognise the real issues at stake, and they are, with the greatest respect to Margaret Mitchell, not the issues that she raised. The issues that Liam McArthur raised, that Clare Baker raised, and that the Cabinet Secretary raised are the real issues of this debate. I just want briefly, Presiding Officer, to go through what those are, because Brexit puts at risk a range of co-operation across both civil and criminal law, including police co-operation, which exists in tackling organised crime, helps to keep our citizens safe and also, and this is vitally important, to live and work across the EU. When Liam McArthur draws attention to the issues of terrorism, as he did very well, he then went on to draw attention to the issues of family court issues, the commercial law issues, the issues of bread and butter, in doing business in and living across countries in the EU. Those are the legal systems in the legal protections that people take advantage of day after day. Members of the Labour Party also draw attention to those. Unless we are in a position to ensure that those continue in the way they are continuing, then the disruption will come, not, I believe, in matters of security or terrorism, because those are often matters of domestic activity and domestic protection. They will come when individuals are not able to get resolution and commercial disputes, are not able to sign and enforce contracts, are not able to have resolution in matters of family law and divorce and very difficult personal matters, and there is no reason why those matters should be disrupted. That is at the very core of this debate, because what this debate is about is a series of choices. We hear from the born-again Brexiteers that, in some sense, this was inevitable and that it has had to happen and these changes had to take place. That is absolutely not true. We now have to consider the balance of advantage. Where does the advantage lie? Is there a greater advantage in not being part of or only being an associate part of those legal arrangements, or is there a greater advantage in being part of those arrangements? The European arrest warrant is a very important case in point. Yes, there are countries that outside the EU have negotiated their own arrangements—Norway and Iceland, for example—but the time that they have taken to negotiate and set up those arrangements has been far, far longer. The way in which those systems operate for those countries is much less satisfactory. We have heard again and again about case studies in this chamber, in which action has been able to be taken almost instantly, and that is not just because of the procedures that exist. It is about the ability of individuals to co-operate. When you have, for example, the Eurojust with the prosecutors sitting together in the same building as the international court, they are able to build and develop relationships that allow justice to be well served—not just to family justice and commercial justice, but in that case to criminal justice to be well served. Why would you disrupt those arrangements? For anything that happens, any weakening of those arrangements will disrupt them. I give way to Oliver Mundell. Oliver Mundell. I thank the minister for his kind comments in relation to my remark. I will be slightly less kind in reply. I think that he is just doing the same as what I had identified, which is identifying the issues. Still, we have not heard a single constructive suggestion on how the Scottish Government is going to protect those rights. constructive suggestion—I am putting to Mr Mundell in the chamber—is a constructive suggestion of first recognising the difficulties that exist, not sweeping them under the carpet, not saying that they do not really matter to us, but saying that what structures could be put in place to avoid that. We will bring to the chamber, as the First Minister's committee herself, our preferred alternative. However, there is a better alternative, which is not to have gone down this route in the first place. That would have been the best alternative not to be in this position. I give way to Mr Mundell. Oliver Mundell. Does Mike Russell not accept that that ship has now quite simply sailed? Mr Russell, that ship has 62 per cent support in Scotland, that is the majority support in Scotland, that is the voice of our constituents in Scotland who are saying that they did not want this to happen. Of course. I think that there is a big difference between saying that the majority of people in Scotland did not want to leave the EU, which I accept, and saying that now 62 per cent of people in Scotland want to disrupt the Brexit process and are backing this current plan to stir up tensions. I do not regard stirring up tensions as representing the issues and interests of the people of Scotland. If the Tory party understands representing the interests of Scotland as stirring up tensions, no wonder that they are so bad at their day job, because that is their day job. Their day job is to protect the interests of their constituents and the interests of Scotland, and that is what we will do. That is what this Government will do, because never, ever on the watch of this Government will we let down the people of Scotland, and their vital interests lie in making sure that whatever settlement is reached, it is a settlement that ensures that their life is not disrupted. Not disrupted in terms of prosecution and certainly not disrupted in terms of the protections that come from the European arrest warrant, from family law, from commercial law. We have an opportunity in this chamber of making sure that we develop a distinctive position. That is what these debates are about. Those members who criticise those debates are trying to walk away from their responsibilities. I would encourage them to stick with their responsibilities, because it is only by those debates and by the discussion that we are having that we formulate the robust position that Scotland must have in order to get, not the best, because the best unfortunately appears to be alluding us at the moment, but to get as much as we possibly can for Scotland in the discussions ahead. That concludes our debate on the EU referendum. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 2258, in the name of Jo Fitzpatrick, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau setting out a revised business programme for tomorrow. I would ask any member who wishes to speak against the motion to press their request-to-speak button now, and I call on Jo Fitzpatrick to move motion 2258. No member has asked to speak against the motion. I put the question to the chamber. The question is that motion 2258, in the name of Jo Fitzpatrick, be agreed. Are we all agreed? We are all agreed. The next item of business is consideration of a parliamentary bureau motion. I ask Jo Fitzpatrick to move motion 2259, on the suspension of standing orders. Thank you. The question will be put at decision time. To which we now come, and there are four questions. I wish to remind members that if the amendment to the name of Douglas Ross is agreed, then the amendment in the name of Clare Baker falls. The first question is that amendment 2203.2, in the name of Douglas Ross, which seeks to amend the motion in the name of Michael Matheson, be agreed. Are we all agreed? We are not agreed. We will move to a vote, and members may cast their votes now. The result of the vote on amendment 220.3, in the name of Douglas Ross, is, as follows, yes, 29, no, 93. There were no abstentions. The amendment is therefore not agreed. The next question is that amendment 2203.1, in the name of Clare Baker, which seeks to amend motion 2203, in the name of Michael Matheson, be agreed. Are we all agreed? We are not agreed. We will move to a vote, and Parliament may cast their votes now. The result of the vote on amendment 2203.1, in the name of Clare Baker, is yes, 94, no, 29. There were no abstentions. The amendment is therefore agreed. The next question is that motion 2203, in the name of Michael Matheson, as amended, be agreed. Are we all agreed? We are not agreed. We will move to a vote, and members may cast their votes now. The result of the vote on motion 2203, in the name of Michael Matheson, as amended, is yes, 94, no, 29. There were no abstentions. The motion is therefore agreed. Our final question is that motion 2259, in the name of Joe Fitzpatrick, on the suspension of standing orders, be agreed. Are we all agreed? We are all agreed. That concludes decision time. We will now move to members' business. I would ask members to change seats for this debate.


morning and welcome everyone to class. What happened Joseph? You've gone right at the back. Welcome everyone to class this morning. I hope you all had a good weekend just experiencing the power of God, the resurrection power of God even as we celebrated what he did for us on the cross and his resurrection. I hope you all had a blessed weekend with the family and also with God. Back again to another week of learning. Today we'll be looking at the last lesson in Christology chapter 13, The Son of God. Before we study about the Son of God, can one of you please lead us in prayer please? Anyone? Can anyone lead us in prayer please? That's great. Thank you. Thank you for this moment with your father, Lord. This large session has stopped in your hand. Lord, your guide us, lead us. Keep your wisdom and knowledge. We will be able to understand your word of God, Lord. Lord, you are especially paying for man. I submit to your hand. Lord, you teach her. Give her knowledge of wisdom. Lord, we will be able to learn from her. Lord, thanks for this moment and I pray in Jesus name. Amen. Amen. Thank you. So we will study chapter 13, The Son of God. Now, even as we will be studying this chapter or even as we will be talking about the Son of God, we will approach this in a little different manner. We'll just step out of the realm of our time and space and we'll step into the eternal realm and journey there, even as we talk about the Son of God. So even as we approach this chapter, even as we study about the Son of God, we will approach this in a very different manner. We will step outside the realm of our time and space and we'll step into the eternal realms and we will journey on from there and we will look at or study and talk about the Son of God. I'd like to start to read three scripture passages for us. The first one is Genesis chapter one, verse one, in the beginning God. Okay. To stop there, Genesis chapter one, verse one, in the beginning God. Okay. We'll turn to John chapter one, verses one to four and let's all read that together, please. John chapter one, verses one to four. It's not there in your notes, so you'll have to turn in your bibles. I hope all of you have your bibles with you. So let's read John chapter one, verses one to four. Let's begin. All of us together reading. In the beginning, what was the word? And the word was God. He was made through him and without him, nothing was made that was made. In him was life and the life was the light of men. So let's turn to Luke chapter one, verses 34 to 35. Can somebody read that please? Luke chapter one, verses 34 and 35. Then Mary said to the angel, how can this be since I do not know a man? And the angel answered and said to her, the Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the highest will overshadow you. Therefore also that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God. Amen. Thank you, Warren. So the Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God. Okay. So we're going to be studying about the Son of God. And as I said, we will be stepping out of our realm of time and space into the eternal realms. And we will look at what we can learn about the Son of God or what we can talk about the Son of God, even as we look at the eternal realms. Now we read or scripture says in Genesis chapter one, verse one in the beginning. Okay. So this was in the beginning when God created the world. Okay. But before the beginning, there was God. Yes. Before the beginning, there was God. So God was there before the beginning and God was the cause of the beginning because it was God who created the beginning. Okay. So let's go back before the beginning of time. Let's go back even before the creation of the world to get an understanding of what scripture reveals to us took place even before the beginning of the world. So let's go back and look at scripture verses to get an understanding of what scripture tells us or reveals to us that took place even before the beginning of the world, even before the world was created. Okay. So what do scriptures reveal about this God who was there even before the beginning? So we're going to look at scripture and we're going to see what scripture reveals about this God who was there even before the beginning. So we look at a few things. The first thing is that this God was there even before the beginning of this world was eternal. What is the meaning of eternal everlasting? No end, no beginning. Okay. He was, he is, he will always be. Okay. Deuteronomy chapter 33 verse 27 says the eternal God is your refuge. Okay. Deuteronomy chapter 33 verse 27 says that he is the eternal God and this eternal God is our refuge. Look at what 1st Timothy chapter 1 verse 17 says. Can somebody read that please? 1st Timothy chapter 1 verse 17. 1st Timothy chapter 1 verse 17. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible to God who alone is wise. We honor and glory forever and ever. Amen. Amen. So it talks about the God who is the eternal King who's immortal and invisible. Can someone else read Psalm 90 verse 2 and someone else can read Isaiah chapter 40 verse 28. Psalm 90 verse 2 and Isaiah chapter 40 verse 28. Psalms 90 verse 2. Before the mountains were brought forth or ever you had formed the earth and the world even from everlasting to everlasting you are God. Amen. Thank you Lucy. So here we see that even before anything was created God was from everlasting to everlasting which means he is eternal. Isaiah chapter 40 verse 28. Isaiah. Please go ahead sister. No go ahead Sanjay. Isaiah 40 verse 28. Have you not known, have you not heard the everlasting God, the Lord, the creator of the ends of the earth. Neither faints nor is weary. His understanding is unsearchable. Amen. Thank you Sanjay. So here we see that he is an everlasting God okay and the one who this everlasting God is the one who created the ends of the earth and he neither faints nor is weary and his understanding is unsearchable okay.  He is also self-existent. Can someone read John chapter 5 verse 26 please. John chapter 5 verse 26. John chapter 5 verse 26. For as the Father has life in himself so he has granted the Son to have life in himself. Amen.  They do not depend on anything for their own dependence for their survival. The Father has life in himself and so he has granted the Son to have life in himself. So this God is self-existent. He's also a God who is infinite. So can one of you read Psalm 104 verse 1 someone else can read Psalm 147 verse 5 someone else can read Isaiah chapter 40 verse 18.  Amen. So here we see that he's a God who is great okay. He's infinite which means there's no measure to his attributes. There's no measure to his greatness. There's no measure to his power. There is no measure to his wisdom and there is no measure to his understanding. He's a God who is infinite which means there is no measure to his attributes. There is no measure to his greatness, to his power, to his understanding and to his wisdom. Okay can someone read Psalm 147 verse 5. Great is our Lord and mighty in power. His understanding is infinite. Amen. So here we see that his understanding is limitless with no measure and Isaiah said in Isaiah chapter 40 verse 18 what does the prophet Isaiah say? Isaiah 40 13 18 18. To whom then will you liken God or what likeness will you compare to him? Yes so to whom will you liken God to or what likeness will you compare him to? Which means that there is no one we can compare God to okay and there is nothing that we can compare him to because he is limitless.  He has all wisdom. He has all understanding and he has all knowledge okay and this God who exists even before existed even before the foundation of the world is a God who's a triune God which means he's one God in what is the meaning of triune Trinity one God in hello one God in Trinity three people thank you Sanjay one God in three persons okay Trinity means one God in three persons okay all three of them are God they are all equally God okay so we believe in the Trinity there is one God who has revealed himself in three persons and where do we find Trinity mentioned in scripture one passage in Genesis okay in the New Testament sorry Lucy Christian first Peter first Peter one John chapter five verse seven can somebody read that please I think it's in the NKJV Wales version it's very clearly says one John chapter five verse seven can somebody read that please but there are three that we are witnessing heaven the Father the world and the Holy Spirit and these are three or one amen so if somebody asks you where in the Bible is Trinity mentioned where is it mentioned very clearly one John chapter five verse seven but there are three that bear witness in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one okay so these three are one they are co-equal and each of them fully represents the Godhead okay and the Bible reveals to us that this God is the God of glory okay this God is the God of glory and glory is the very nature the very essence the very expression of who God is so what is glory glory is basically the very essence the very nature the very attributes of who God is so the glory of God basically is the expression of God's attributes it's an expression of his goodness his mercy his truth his compassion his grace his love his kindness his forbearance so the glory of God is basically the expression of his attributes so glory is the very nature the very expression the very essence of who God is okay and God's glory is so precious and God will not share his glory with anyone else okay like we read in Isaiah chapter 42 verse 8 that his glory is so precious that it says Isaiah says in Isaiah chapter 42 verse 8 that God will not share his glory with another and God says that I will not share with my glory with anyone else so we see that each person of the Godhead held or had the glory of the Godhead in themselves okay John chapter 17 verse 5 John chapter 17 verse 24 also speak about this and hence we see that each one of them in the Godhead God the Father God the Son God the Holy Spirit fully represents the Godhead each one of them are God each one of them are you know fully represent the Godhead so we see that even before the foundations of the world there was this God who is eternal there's God who is infinite God who is um self-existent God who is um uh in a great in his wisdom in his understanding in his knowledge and also this God is a triune God okay he's a triune God okay he's also this God who is there even before the foundation of the world is a God of love we see that there is love in the Godhead and love defines the relationship between God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit okay look at what one John chapter 4 verse 8 says one John chapter 4 verse 8 can somebody read that please and someone else can read John chapter 17 verse 24 one John chapter 4 verse 8 and John chapter 17 verse 24 one John chapter 4 verse 8 he who does not love does not know God for God is love yes God is love okay John chapter 17 verse 24 Father I desire that they also whom you gave me may be with me where I am that they may behold my glory which you have given me for you love me before the foundation of the world amen so here we see that even before the foundation of the world there was love in the Godhead there was love between God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit and love defined the relationship in the Godhead we also see that this God is a God of life okay this God who existed even before the foundation of the world this God is a God of life he is life he has life in himself he is the source of eternal life he is a source of immortal life and he has the God kind of life in him John chapter 1 verse 4 can somebody read that please John chapter 1 verse 4 John chapter 1 verse 4 in him was life and the life was the light of men amen in him was life and the life was the light of men and the life here is what is the Greek word for life here Zoe okay good Zoe life which means the God kind of life the eternal life the immortal life that God has in himself he has given us that life so God has this kind of eternal immortal life that he has in himself this God is also the God of light okay God is light first Timothy chapter 6 verse 16 can somebody read that please first Timothy chapter 6 verse 16 who alone as immortality dwelling in up unapproachable light whom no man has seen or can see to whom be honor and everlasting power amen amen so here we know that God has life in himself this God is God of who is love and also this God is light he dwells in unapproachable light okay and this God is also the God who is the great I am okay he is the I am who dwells in the eternal now and also he lives outside of time and that is why he says that he is the I am okay he lives with us in in our time and space he lives in the eternal now but he also lives outside of time that means he's not bound by time and that's why he says he is the I am he is also the alpha and the omega we studied about this we read about this that he is the alpha and the omega in revelation chapter 1 verses 8 and 11 revelation chapter 21 verse 6 and revelation chapter 22 verse 13 so as the one who is the great I am as the one who is the alpha and omega the Bible says that time is irrelevant for God God lives outside time and space so for him one day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day so what does this this verse mean that you know one day is like a thousand years and a thousand years is like a day for God what does it mean yes it just basically is an attempt to convey to us that God is a God who lives outside of time okay time has no hold on him okay and time does not matter to him he lives outside time and space so before the beginning okay the I am stood at the beginning and at the ending of time and he knows everything in between okay I'll say that again before the beginning of time the great I am stood at the beginning at the same time he also stands at the end of time and he knows everything that is going to happen between the beginning to the end okay that is why the Bible says in Isaiah chapter 46 verse 10 can somebody read that Isaiah chapter 46 verse 10 Isaiah chapter 46 verse 10 Isaiah chapter 46 verse 10 declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things that are not yet done saying my counsel shall stand and I will do all my pleasures yes his counsel will stand he will do everything what he wants this he desires to do and he declares the end from the beginning or from the beginning to the end so he stood at the beginning and at the end and he declares everything in it he declares everything in between that is going to happen that is happening now and it's going to happen in the future okay Acts chapter 15 verse 18 can somebody read that please Acts chapter 15 verse 18 known to God from eternity are all his works so known to God from eternity are all his works that means even before he created everything even before everything is unfolding in history he knows everything even before the foundation of the world okay so in the mind of God okay before the beginning the Bible says that God completed all of his works before he even started it isn't that amazing how great this God is that the scripture says even before the beginning of the world the Bible says that God completed all of his works even before he started it which means he finished everything from the beginning to the end even before it started isn't that amazing yes question so having a look at this verse will God also know that you know who will be saved and who won't be saved yes he knows he knew even before the foundations of the world even before you were born you were conceived in your mother's womb even if your mother was born your great grandparents were born he knew who would choose him and who would not choose him but we still continue to reach out and yes it's a free will for people who have yes we're going to look at that yes we're going to study that as well yeah so in the mind of God the Bible says that he completed all his works even before he started it he finished everything even before it had began okay look at what Hebrews chapter four verse three says Hebrews chapter four verse three can somebody read that please all of you with me yes Hebrews chapter four verse three someone for me who have believed do enter the rest as he has said so I swore in my wrath they shall not enter my rest although the works were finished from the foundation of the world amen so here it says that the works were finished before the foundations of the world how do we know that God finished everything even before it began Hebrews chapter four verse three the latter half says all of the works were finished from the foundation of the world so what did this great I am complete even before it began to unfold in history okay we're going to look at scripture we're going to look at the Bible we're going to look at one of the things that the that the great I am completed even before it began to unfold in history okay are you ready are you all excited okay so what did the I am complete even before he began to unfold in history okay so even before history began the great I am completed that he in his mind conceived and decided that he will have a family of people he will have a family of sons and daughters who would love and be loved by him okay so the first thing is okay we look at how this great I am you know had in his mind a family of people sons and daughters you and I who would be loved by him who would love and be loved by him look at Ephesians chapter one was spoken somebody read that these Ephesians chapter one was for just as he chose us in him before the foundations of the world that we should be holy and without blame before him in love amen so he chose us in him before the foundations of the world that we should be holy and without blame before him in love so God decided that he will have a family of sons and daughters people who he would love and be loved by him that's the first thing that I'm just saying first thing but maybe it's not just the first thing in the mind of God but we are just looking at it in our order okay so what is the things that the great I am completed even before began to unfold in history that was a family of people second thing is he decided that he will be our father and that we would be his sons and daughters that we would be his children look at Ephesians chapter one was five Ephesians one versus five having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good pleasure of his will amen so he predestined us or he decided that he will be our father and that we will be his children that we will be his sons and daughters and he decided that he would create people as free moral beings who will be created in his image and in his likeness and however you know creating us as free moral beings he knew that there would be a what did he knew know he there will be even before God knew that he would create us as free moral beings he knew that it will be a problem right it will be a problem if he creates us as free moral beings he knew that we would rebel against him that we would sin against him and that we would give away what he has entrusted to us to the enemy all of you with me yes okay so he decided to create us as free moral beings but he knew that there will be a problem he knew that we will rebel against him we would sin against him he also knew that we will give away what he entrusts to us that we will give it away to the enemy he also saw that sin would change the world and to recover us back to himself would require the work of redemption okay so God knew that all this is going to happen God also knew that there would he would require the work of redemption to recover everything that he gave us that we've given back to the we've given away to the enemy so there must have been a discussion between the godhead okay god the father god the son god the holy spirit discussing among themselves and the second person of the trinity that is the eternal word spoke and said that he that he will he would have told god the father i will become your son i will become a man and i will become that lamb to bear the sins and take away the sins of the entire mankind and bring the people back to ourselves or bring the people back um and by paying the redemption price and bring them back to ourselves again so the second person of the trinity the eternal word became the lamb of god the bible says that he was or the eternal word became the lamb of god even before the foundation of the world okay so it was not just when jesus came and that on the cross that he became the lamb of god even before it took place in history in the kairos time it was something that was conceived in the heart and mind of god is a completed thing it was a done thing that even before the beginning even before the foundation of the world the eternal word became the lamb of god look at what first peter chapter one verse 20 says can somebody read that please and someone else can open to revelation chapter 13 verse 8 and someone else can open to Ephesians chapter one verse seven first peter chapter one verse 20 please first peter chapter you can read system go ahead anusha god chose him as your ransom law before the world began but now in peace last days he has been revealed for years amen so he says he indeed was foreordained before the foundation of the world that means christ was foreordained even before the foundation of the world to become the lamb of god but was manifest in these last times for you that means it was what was a mystery in the heart and mind of god was revealed to us in in history in in our time and in in our day okay revelation chapter 13 verse 8 can someone read that please all who dwell on earth will worship him whose names have not been written in the book of life of the lamb slain from the foundation of the world amen so we see that here that um you know um the lamb of god okay was slain from the foundation of the world so even before the foundation of the world the lamb of god was slain and where do we read this revelation chapter 13 verse 8 okay and because of the lamb of god okay we will have redemption through his blood freely by grace our sins will be forgiven and we will be accepted as his beloved sons and daughters look at what Ephesians chapter one verse seven says he is so rich in kindness and grace that he purchased our freedom with the blood of his son and forgave our sins amen so it says in him we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace okay so even before the foundations of this world what is the great i am completed he completed in his mind that the lamb of god was already slain for the redemption of the sins of mankind and through his blood we will see forgiveness of sins um according to riches of his grace okay so the god had saw through time and they saw that some will accept the lamb of god and some will reject the lamb of god so even before the foundations of the world the god had bought the father got the son got the holy spirit they saw through time okay from the beginning of time till the end of time they saw who will accept the lamb of god and who will reject the lamb of god and they four knew of a new beforehand the choice each person will make it does not mean that god made the choice for us it does not mean that he chose some of us for salvation some of us to be destined to heaven and some of us to be destined to heaven no that is not right that is not the nature of god he's not a partial god like we did i think in roman chapter one was 21 it's not a god of partiality i don't know if it's one 21 or roman chapter two somewhere in roman chapter two but he's not a partial god but we see that he knew beforehand who is going to choose him and who is going to forsake him so he knew or if four knew or he knew beforehand the choice each person will make and he decided that those who make a choice to believe in the lamb of god that he would make them the his sons and daughters and they would be transformed into the very image of the son of god so all of you with me able to understand so even before the foundations of the world god knew who is going to make a choice who is going to choose to believe in the lamb of god and he already decided that though these are the people who are going to choose the lamb of god and these he would make his sons and daughters and these are the ones he would transform him into the very image of the son of god so god decided that those who would choose him they would be conformed to the image of his son and he already predestined or he already knew four knew beforehand who is going to choose him and he's going he knew and he knows that these would be conformed to the image of with the likeness of his son we read this in roman's chapter eight versus 29 to 30 can somebody read that please roman's chapter eight was 29 to 30 roman's chapter years was 39 for whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his son that he might be the first one among many brethren was 30 more ever warm he predestined these he also called whom he called these he also justified and whom he justified these he also glorified yes so here we see that he knew beforehand okay who is going to choose him any predestined that there will be conformed to the image of his son okay and he knew who is going to choose him and these are the ones he's going to call as his sons and daughters these are the ones who will be justified and these are the ones he would glorify so this was does not mean that god made the choice for us okay please listen carefully god did not make the choice for us he created us as free moral beings he gave us the gift of volition that means he gave us the gift to make our own choices so we choose him or we rejected him he did not make the choice for us but he foreknew beforehand who is going to choose him and he decided beforehand that these are the ones he's going to transform into the image of the likeness of his son so in time okay he knew who he knew each one of you even before the foundation of the world he knew you're going to make a choice but in time when we make the choice or we made the choice to believe in the Lamb of God we now become his called or now we become his sons and daughters we are the ones who are justified made righteous and the ones will be also glorified okay so what did this great I am complete even before the foundations of the world or even before it began to unfold in history we saw that this great I am decided that he'll have a family of people he decided that he will be our father and he decided that those who accept him or choose the Lamb of God will become his sons and his daughters and he predestined them to be conformed to the image of the likeness of his son okay and also he what did he complete even before it began to unfold in history he completed the spirit of sonship so we were saying that even as the god the father god the son and god the holy spirit were discussing among themselves and god the son the second person of the Trinity said I will become your son I will become a man I will go down to the earth I will become that lamb who will pay the redemption price and even as he said that the third person of the Trinity or the third person of the godhead okay whom we know as the holy spirit spoke up and said I will assist the eternal word in his mission of redemption I will anoint him I will empower him and I will raise him up from the dead so this is a discussion that's just happening between god the father god the son and god the holy spirit so god the holy spirit says that you know he will empower the eternal word he will empower the son of god and he said he will assist him in assist the word in his mission of redemption he will anoint him he will empower him and he will raise him up from the dead so in the godhead or amongst the godhead okay they already had a complete plan of redemption even before Adam and Eve sin even before the foundation of the world okay and the holy spirit also said that I will be the spirit of adoption I will dwell in each one of them who will receive the lamb of god and I will bring them into our family isn't that wonderful look at what Romans chapter 8 verses 14 to 17 says can somebody read that please Romans 8 14 to 17 Romans chapter 8 verse 14 for as many as are led by the spirit of god these are sons of god verse 15 for you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear but you received the spirit of adoption by whom we cry out up our father was 16 the spirit himself we are witness with our spirit that we are children of god was 17 and if children then hires hairs of god and joined to hairs with Christ if indeed we suffer with him that we may also be glorified together is still not audible sister sorry yeah we see that the spirit of god is the spirit of adoption he said he will dwell in those who will receive the lamb of god and he will make them hairs of god and joint hairs with Christ Jesus okay so god decided that those who choose him also their names will be written in the book of life so the book of life was written even before the foundation of the world isn't that amazing the book of life was written even before the beginning even before god created the foundations of the world your name my name all of the names who accept and choose the lamb of god and believe in the lamb of god your name was already written in it even before the beginning okay and so the god had wrote the names in the book of life look at what revelation chapter 13 verse 8 says we already read this but we can read it again revelation chapter 13 verse 8 all who dwell on the earth will worship him whose names have not been written in the book of life of the lamb slain from the foundation of the world yes so who will worship him only those whose names are written in the book of life and not those who are not written in the book of life so the book of life was written your name my name was written even before the foundation of the world okay and god said that he will go a step further and he says that these people whose names have written are written in the book of right life i will cause them to inherit my kingdom i will cause them to be not only part of my kingdom but there will be hairs of my kingdom they will inherit my kingdom and that is why you know god gives us the keys of the authority of his kingdom so god prepared a kingdom or a kingdom was prepared for us as sons and daughters so the god had also decided even before the foundation of the world that those who will receive the lamb of god will be brought into the kingdom of god and they will inherit the kingdom and there will be hairs of god and joint hairs of christ jesus in the kingdom isn't that amazing that you are hairs of god and joint hairs with christ jesus in the kingdom of god and you are part of the kingdom of god look at what the bible says in matthew chapter 25 was 34 can somebody read that please matthew chapter 25 was 34 anyone the online students would like to read matthew 25 34 then the king will say to those on his right hand come you blessed of my father inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world amen so here bar has created or prepared the found the kingdom even before the foundation of the world and he has he knows who are going to inherit the kingdom that is prepared for them and he says come those who are blessed by my father inherit the kingdom that is prepared for you before the foundation office of the world so god said that this is the plan of the ages okay what is the plan of the ages that he will have a what is the first one have a family amen thank you lucy you have a family of people who would be sons and daughters who would be would love and be loved by him secondly secondly what is the i am complete even before it began to unfold in history redemption work he decided that he will be our father that we will be his sons and daughters okay the third one that the lamb of god will become the plan that would pay the redemption price fourthly that we will be adopted as the sons and daughters that those who adopted as sons and daughters will be conformed to the image of his son fifthly anyone remembers before that the spirit of sonship the holy spirit you know will attest to us that we are sons and daughters and then sixthly that our names are written in the book of life and seventh what the seventh one which i just mentioned all of you are nobody's writing anything it's not in your notes nobody's writing you're just looking at space and so i know nobody is listening what is the last we'll inherit the kingdom of god thank god for lucy a kingdom prepared for sons and daughters that we will inherit the kingdom of god okay like we read in matthew chapter 25 verse 34 so god said this is the plan of the ages and this plan was a mystery which he kept hidden within himself so this plan was a mystery that was hidden within the god and so you know all of this was this plan was done and completed in the mind of the great i am the end from the beginning or the beginning to the end was everything was completed was conceived was done thing in the heart and mind of god but he hid this in himself as a secret as a mystery and the and it was a plan that god alone knew that he would alone unfold okay and that he would later on progressively reveal to the church okay so all of this that was in the heart and mind of the godhead all that we had planned all the work was completed was done and then was the beginning okay so you and i are very privileged because we have the word of god which is this mystery which is revealed to us even before the beginning we have the word of god scripture reveals everything that was a mystery the plan of god is revealed to us and so the plan of ages which was already conceived and completed in the mind of god even before the beginning okay of world is the beginning of time is now beginning to unfold but everything was completed and done and then began the beginning isn't that wonderful that we have such a great awesome mighty god who's completed everything and then is the beginning and now we are seeing everything but we have the privilege of looking back and seeing and knowing this great i am this god who was there or existed even before the beginning of time okay any questions anyone has i hope you are able to understand it was not greek and latin or hebrew for any of you okay any questions thank you sanjay lucy pratt thank you any questions okay if there are no questions we'll stop here the next class we will look at what happened in the beginning okay thank you everyone have a blessed day and i'll see you on friday thank you sister


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel and I appreciate you being here today I bring you another destiny 2 video and today I bring you a quick video and how you can obtain or have a chance of obtaining the new fallen theme grenade launcher the Anarchy But before I go any further guys if you do enjoy the video and would like to show you support You can by hitting that like button and if you are new around here and enjoy daily destiny 2 videos Make sure you subscribe Okay, so with the black army DLC there hasn't been much of an inclusion of many new exotics We get five in total besides any sneaky hidden ones bungee haven't told us about but the five are there isn't argues burden sniper rifle They're the monarchy pole the Jolton fusion rifle arm blaster the anarchy grenade launcher and the last word hand cannon Classic destiny one weapon which everybody wanted to see you turn and it's returning now We know one exotic comes from the mysterious box Which was found within the first forge the volando forge on the easy within that cave But we don't know what this exotic is my bet is probably the Jolton fusion rifle arm blaster We know the last word comes from a quest called the draw on the 29th of January 2019 and that is it that's all we know well until today The raid dropped earlier the scourge of the past on the EDZ the new raid for the black army DLC Well, it's been confirmed now that the anarchy grenade launcher that fallen themed beast Which shoots mines which chain together and just absolutely melt enemies It's been confirmed that this exotic is the raid exotic bungee stated this on Twitter Anarchy an exotic grenade launcher is a rairdrop from completing the scourge of the past raid So there is people the exotic which is exclusive to the scourge of the past raid is a grenade launcher Bungee really pushing grenade launchers, ain't they I mean like what so it's a rairdrop So I believe it's much like the 1000 voices for me I ain't ever getting that shit and probably won't ever get this now that though Are we getting clips of me to my top fives of people getting his first try which is just annoying as heck But you're saying that people my luck has changed since the black army's dropped I've got seven exotics five of them which should be new ones which I haven't had since forsaken so I can't really complain Before that it had been a whole month without me getting a single exotic So my luck is definitely changing people But yeah guys just a quick video on how you can obtain the anarchy fallen themed Exotic grenade launcher at the moment. I don't think anybody has this weapon Even though I know a few people have completed a new raid already I'm still unsure. I do not think anybody's got it yet But don't quote me on that but I know guys we have come to the end of the video if you enjoyed it Even though that really does help out if you're new around here and enjoy daily destiny two videos like guys top fives gameplay Reviews just about everything make sure you subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I upload turn notifications and by hitting that bell button, but again, thanks for stopping by and hopefully I will see you on that next one