Tom here from Lawrence Systems, and is Zoom secure? Let's dive into a couple of the topics on there and kind of clarify a couple of things about how Zoom works. So if you want to learn more about me and my company, head over to LawrenceSystems.com. If you want to hire short projectors, they hire us button up at the top. If you want to support this channel in other ways, there's some affiliate links down below to get you deals and discounts on products and services we talk about on this channel. Represent Security has the war dialing tool exposes Zoom password problems, and Zoom has actually done a good job of responding and keeping uninvited guests out. And a lot of this has to do with the tyranny of the default. What happens is you leave the default settings as very easy so you can get lots of new users to join. Zoom skyrocketed for having, what I'm gonna say is a pretty good product here for the price. Zoom has a lot more features in a lot of the competitors. It works really well, it works very smooth. They have a lot of extra bells and whistles being able to hold polls during it, being able to share a screen, being able to locally save a copy of the recording. All these features were in the right place at the right time when suddenly everyone decided to work remotely. But those defaults of course came to bite them and they've had to dramatically respond. And a lot of it is because each Zoom meeting conference has assigned a meeting ID of nine to 10, nine to 11 digits. Naturally hackers have figured out a way they can simply guess and automate the guessing of random IDs within this digit space. And that's where war dialing comes in. You're not familiar with war dialing, it's an old term in the hacker community where you just take and incrementally go through numbers to discover what is on them. Back in the early days of phones, it was dialing numbers incrementally until you could figure out what was on each phone number. And logging the results with an automated tool and going back later and picking out the interesting ones and dialing up and figuring out what systems they were attached to. As much fun as that was, it's easy to translate into things like Zoom IDs where you can just go through and guess IDs. And this has led to people just randomly joining your Zoom because of these simple defaults of everyone can just click the link and join and people posting the links publicly. So they have now updated the defaults inside of Zoom and they have some guides here that I'll leave to to dive into how to really lock down and secure Zoom. They've also changed some of the defaults even if you have an existing account and put passwords on it and things like that. And I change mine to one, two, three, four, five, six. But by the way, when you're sharing out a link, you're frequently sharing the password embedded with it. That's one of the options it has. So these securities are helpful, but don't just tweet it out unless you want more people in there. And also they have the option put people in waiting rooms so you can approve who you want in there. So think about some of those things, go over the security settings. They're pretty simple to do here and especially things like setting up a waiting room and how do you want to proceed for letting people in? But the other part is what type of security does Zoom offer? Well, that's what I wanted to dive into. So right here is just nstatmpinatgrep Zoom. What does this mean? Well, we're going to launch Zoom and let's see what IP addresses it connects to. All right, here's some of the IP addresses it connects to and we'll just quickly do a new meeting. All right, and I can't start video because I'm using the video here so it just shows my account. But we can see I generated some traffic and it's going and connecting here. So I'm going to end the meeting for all and I'm going to go ahead and sign out of Zoom and exit. All right, and it just dropped all the connections. So now we go over to Wireshark. And what I did here, well, briefly, here's all those connections I saved. I mean, you can create a query in Wireshark or a filter, I should say not query. And what this does, I just said, hey, take all these IP addresses and filter for these. So I don't get all the traffic, I get just all the Zoom traffic. So I wanted to see all the traffic that's going inside of here and where is it going? So after doing a little bit of diving and the first question is, what about security? Well, let's start there. And I was going through and you can see right here, this is where it's doing the server hello for TLS 1.2. It does do a proper handshake. It goes through, grabs a security certificate, validates it, then starts the encrypted session. So once you're in here, yeah, Zoom is indeed using encryption. So go through and we can see all the encrypted layers. Now it's kind of interesting to me of just how many different IP addresses it connects to. I thought that was kind of interesting. But here and over there, it does have a lot of connections there. The other thing interesting about Zoom is it doesn't seem to have any that I could find peer-to-peer components. So I'd actually forged some of this, had set up a couple demo meetings with, I'm at home, I'm at my office right now and I set them up with my wife at home. And there is no exposure of my public IP address from home into Zoom as far as from my layer here. So Zoom definitely is always brokering through their servers the connection. But that leads to the privacy question a lot of people had, well, what about privacy? Well, they claim in an encryption, but one of the things the way Zoom works is their servers have to be able to see within the video stream. This is how they're able to manage all the participants, manage who's talking, switch screens and everything else. So that does mean, and this is true for most other video systems that do provide transport layer encryption, but they're using the words end to end encryption. They're in the middle of that end. So between me and my wife and the conversation we had over Zoom while I was testing was end to end encrypted, but the middleman was still Zoom. And so that's not too surprising, but it's one of those things when you think about it from a privacy standpoint, Zoom has had to answer a lot of questions lately kind of related to this. What are those questions? Well, has any government entity subpoenaed or asked you for information? Zoom has never really had to address this before because they were a very small company with a small user base. This explosion to a 200 million users all of a sudden using it means there's a lot of questions going, hey, we just had a conversation about something and many companies work remotely realize that they are having these conversations and now a third party is technically involved in all those conversations. So you still really have to think about that because this particular application, you're sending things encrypted from people listening on the line, but any government entity or whoever wanted to tap it or if it's a bad actor were to get with inside of Zoom servers, they do have part of the key. So the key handoff is exchange between Zoom and Zoom servers like the Zoom client on my system and Zoom servers and then exchanged again between people who you're joining your meeting, but Zoom always retains and is part of the transport layer of that. So when it comes to their security and privacy, yes, you are relying on them. So they technically could e-stop, listen in or however you wanna look at that from their standpoint. Now, do they have the time to listen into all 200 million people having conversations on their system right now? Probably not statistically that's difficult, but with automation it does get easier if they wanna look for and keyword things because of voice attacks and things like that. Now, like I said, this is not me hammering on Zoom specifically because most all the applications unless you host it yourself and you're the one in control of the servers, they all do the same thing. Very few of them that I'm aware of at all, actually right now I can't think of any that do group conferencing that the server doesn't handle it. The only couple tools that I've done reviews on before that do have end-to-end encryption as in your end and the end and no one in between would be signal messenger. They're one of the ones that's both open source, very clear about how they handle things and they also don't get in the middle of the connection in terms of being able to see the transport layer of the connection. So overall, I still think Zoom's a pretty good tool to use. I end up using it a lot myself because anytime I'm gonna do a podcast conference call with anyone else pretty much this has become the go-to tool form because of its local recording features, clarity and reliability. So I still think it's a good thing to use but I think you always have to be aware of the settings, aware of the potential default problems that you can have with it and make sure that you have passwords on here so you don't have people randomly jumping in and Zoom by me. So hopefully this makes a little bit of sense and if you have more questions, comments, concerns, let's head over to my forums and we can have a more in-depth discussion where this will be posted as well. All right, thanks. And thank you for making it to the end of the video. If you liked this video, please give it a thumbs up. If you'd like to see more content from the channel hit the subscribe button and hit the bell icon if you'd like YouTube to notify you when new videos come out. If you'd like to hire us head over to laurancesystems.com, fill out our contact page and let us know what we can help you with and what projects you'd like us to work together on. If you wanna carry on the discussion head over to forums.laurancesystems.com where we can carry on the discussion about this video, other videos or other tech topics in general even suggestions for new videos they're accepted right there on our forums which are free. Also if you'd like to help the channel in other ways head over to our affiliate page we have a lot of great tech offers for you and once again, thanks for watching and see you next time.


what God has done to us through Jesus Christ. As we read in John chapter 3 verse 16, God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son who died for us because He loved us. So that shows the Father's immense unconditional and immeasurable love for us. So how do we understand that? If you understand the truth, when we read the Word it shows like how much God loves each of us that He gave His only Son, Jesus Christ to us. So when we read through the New Testament, we see that more than 130 scriptures which gives us the reference as a believer who we are in Christ. So as we take time, as we study through this course, we will understand our identity in Christ is so much important and who we are in Christ is who we really are. Our identity is in Christ not on our position, not on a self-worth of the self-image, but our identity is who we are in Christ. So we have about 12 sections of this course. We will go step-by-step and then during this course, we will have two assessment that would one would be the mid assessment which would be at the last week of September and the final assessment the last week of November. So we will give you enough of time to go through the notes and study and the grading system would be like you know depend on the score like 91 to 100% you would be graded as grade A plus and then 76 to 90 would be grade A and then following 51 to 75, we will be sharing this all online with the online students and for the offline we will be grading them. We will be sharing the grading system with you as well in your student guidelines and the resources for this course would be the course notes that we would be sharing the hard copy for the on-campus student and for the online students we have already shared the PDF notes on Google Street and along with that we also encourage you to read our APC publication on the father's love. So for on-campus we would be sharing the book with you and for online students I have posted the link to download this PDF copy of this book. So with that we will move on to a introduction of our course. Well as we start the course I would like to start with an illustration of an orphan boy. Just give me a minute please let me share the notes. Yeah introduction of an orphan boy who lives in Islam and often was living in Islam and what would be his day-to-day life. His day-to-day life will be depending on the next meal what he could get his immediate need his mindset is on his immediate need striving hard for his immediate need. So what happens if a rich man comes and adopts this orphan boy and provides him with everything can he still carry that mentality of and provides him with everything you know whatever his needs have been met and even you don't have to worry for his next meal or for his need everything has been provided for him. Now should this boy change his thinking his behavior and adapt to this lifestyle or should he still live in that mentality of the mentality that he had the form of striving for his need risking his life to meet his need. He should change his mind isn't it because everything has been provided now his identity his lifestyle has been changed into something you know because he's been adopted by this wealthy man and his he needs to let go of his previous orphaned slum boy mentality and learn to think that he is a son of a wealthy man. So what will happen if this boy grows grows up that mentality that identity his behavior changes his lifestyle changes the way he thinks about himself changes. Now with that mentality really think that I need to be a blessing for others. Now what he he'll go back to the same place where he came from with his new clothes with a new identity and he can minister to people there he can witness people he can share about how his life has been changed for Becca. When he shares do you think that he will be impacting the people around that place really yes and will he be a blessing to others when others also adapt and change and been adopted to this will their lifestyle change yes just give me a minute okay so he's having a different mentality things change for him so he elevates himself from the hard background from the suffering what he was going through and now he's adapting to a different background and he's being a blessing to others. So in the same way God completes the work and he's inviting us to live in Christ. So when we have accepted Jesus as a Lord and Savior and our identity is in Him. It's one of the revelation that we get from New Testament is that God has brought us into Jesus Christ. We have been we have been there's a prize that has been paid by Jesus and we have been adopted into that so God has planned for each of us there's a will there's a purpose and there's a determination which is incorporated spiritually into us into Christ that he made us spiritually one with Christ and it's been completely and this is changed and this we our identity has been changed when we are in Christ and there's a grace that has been lavished over us so God has done a great work for us and we are born again now and he did all this by the grace and he invites us to live with that mentality. So when we live in that now our identity is changed. How? Who we are in Christ is who we really are. We need to identify ourselves in the relationship that we have with Christ. We should not see our self-image our self-worth but we need to identify ourselves with Christ so how this truth can change in our life. When we have this mindset the how we conduct our self changes a character the way we relate to each other changes now why because we have a new mindset we have a new identity that's what Paul says in New Testament when we receive Jesus has not been saved here all things are passed away and behold we have become new we have become new in Christ Jesus our thoughts have been changed we are not the same person as how we used to be there is no more striving hard to prove ourselves to show our worth our thoughts are changed the way we lead our life has changed the way we handle different person has changed how how did this change come into us how did this change come into us is it something automatic we receive Jesus switch on just put on that switch things change the mindset changes is it something that's that simple that easy or is it a process it's a process do you think that involves our decision isn't it we need to decide we need to decide okay I choose to lead my life that pleases God there are certain things that we may have to unlearn that which the world thought is till date now when we receive Jesus has a lot in saviour when our identity is in Jesus now our thoughts are changing the way we lead our life changes no more we lead our life pleasing to others we lead our life looking at Christ are we pleasing yes yes yeah yes baptism is yeah we have a question here from our on-campus student could you repeat that question sure yes yes yes that's one of the confirmation but again yeah that is one of the confirmation that you decide okay following your decision that is there but it is a daily process the living that identity in Christ is a process where initial of the days every minute will be a challenge that you need to please God in every decision you're not going to be angry you're not going to be upset you're not going to you know behave the way you used to behave before things are changing slowly within you and yeah so who you are in Christ is who you really are and we learn to place our self image and a self worth not based on our achievements or not on what other people say about us because you know people saying may change if you please them they'll give the flattery but the just the minute you know it changes you know what happens right it won't be the same so people's words or people say also maybe you don't place your identity identity on what people say about you but on the simple fact of who you are in Christ well it will change the way you also relate to God so your relationship with God also changes in this journey you see yourself not setting certain time to pray to talk to God but then it becomes your lifestyle you begin your day with God and you end your day with God whole day like has how you have a close or a best friend with you and how you converse with that friend in the same way you'll start conversing with God you'll start sharing everything with God something that is pleasant you will take it to God first something the challenge that you face in your life in your daily daily moments you will say God come into this situation and help me get through it so you'll base everything with God we see a new fellowship been developed with God and you will enter into the presence of God not based on the work that we do but based on who we are in Christ so this will help us to face our challenges in our daily life so the Christ who is in you just like how John 15 we read like as how you abide in the money abides and you ask anything what you need it the same way Christ who's in you is much greater than the things that are so when you have Christ in you and you are in them and you're going to win any situation any circumstance any circumstance that you may be facing God and you are the majority so this should be in our mind this that we should know that we have God in me and I'm and God and I can do much more than what is expected the any challenges that you face ahead you need to know that you are more than an overcome this journey I'm not joining alone but I have God who's in me journeying in and through me how do you know that he has promised us for I will never leave you nor say I am with you don't base your identity on your position today you may be a company CEO or a director of a company tomorrow you may lose that job what will happen how where is your identity will you say I'm a CEO of so-and-so company will you say I'm a director of so-and-so company so when you place your identity on God and say that I am the child of the most I got can that identity change in your ups and downs that will be the same no matter you're doing well in your life or not this identity will be the same so again and again throughout this course we will be repeating this phrasing who you are in Christ is who really because this is what we want to you know bring it to our to up into our mindset know that your identity is not on your education is not on your on your position that you acquire in your life but your identity in Christ is based on who you are in Jesus Christ okay so when we have this as a mindset it changes our lifestyle it helps us overcome a sin and Romans chapter 6 verse 14 says for sin shall not have dominion over you roman 6 14 says for sin shall not have dominion over you for you are not under law but under grace we are under grace that means what sin will no longer have dominion over each of us because we do not have to be in bondage to sin we have been made we have been set free set free through Christ through the work that Jesus did on the cross so this will also change the way we face demons or the demonic power in our life we may face such challenges in our life but when you come across certain challenges or you know the demons or demonic power when we encounter such situation in our life we will handle it with much more confidence when we know that we are in Christ there is nothing to fear that's what in the book of Timothy says we do not have the spirit of fear but out of power love and a sound mind we have been set free we do not have the spirit of fear we need to know that when we have the spirit of fear we give the we lay the foundation for the enemy to work in us but when we have faith we give the foundation for God to work in and through us I'm sure in the faith class you would have studied on that and you will be studying more on that so what we need to do we need to replace fear with faith for God to move in and through us so when we set a mind that who we are in Christ the minute we know that Christ is with us so when we encounter demon or demonic power we can handle that with much stronger confidence knowing that we are not alone and Christ is with us and he will fight our battle he will help us to be make an overcome so this way it will change the way we also relate to people the way we relate to people changes why because we are a changed person when we look at another person although that person may not be very great in the natural look or maybe in the education but how you relate to that person is not on the position that person is in but you relate to that person as a as a brother in Christ as a sister in Christ and you'll see to it how we can help each other to bring up each other there is no competition in Christ there is no partiality in Christ we are here to help each other and build each other because we are one in Christ so the way we treat the other person changes now how because Christ has asked us to respect each other respect each other live in peace with each other our relationship matters we will try to honor each other because this is what Christ has asked us to be we are we are trying to live our life with the mentality of Christ likeness we're trying to lead our life the image of Christ so our thoughts have been changed the way we uh actions have been changed the way we lead our life the way we treat others are changed now because our mindset is changed so we try not to compete with each other but to collaborate with each other and teach each other help each other and journey together as one body in Christ so there is no when we are in Christ there is no insecurity we need to overcome that we are secured in Christ our promotion comes from Christ our identity is in Christ so we don't have to play any kind of wrong politics in the ministry just allow everyone to grow and you grow we will also be reading in we will also be studying the leader should cast a good leader raises great leaders we should not have any insecurity with others if somebody is doing much better we need to appreciate wow appreciate that person and allow him to grow we should always have this mind this mindset and heart like we need to raise leaders who are much better than us then there is no place for security at the same time yes we also need to learn and upscale ourselves but in the process of doing that we should not allow any kind of sinful nature to grip cripple into us like jealousy pride last self image but have the Christ mentality have the Christ likeness so we need to read we need to start living a life just like Jesus again it is a process we are not perfect I think this process is lifelong life we need to take the help the Holy Spirit to lead our life in that way to lead our life just like the way Jesus lived what would life look like if we truly walked in that identity that inheritance the way we have and Christ so every step that we lead life we need to think like what Jesus w w JD have you heard it before w w JD what's that so every situation when we ask what would Jesus do it becomes much easier to handle that situation what would Jesus do the situation how do I handle it better it takes time we do make mistakes we are not perfect but every time when you analyze yourself I'm sure we will try to be a better person better person that we were yesterday when we look back at our own self what would Jesus do in this situation I think that will help us to do the things that would please God and we will see our self change and this change will not be from outside but this change will be from inside and again as I said it is a process and it will be for our good so yes so this is the reason why God has placed us in Jesus Christ so that we can lead our life in the way Jesus did so the insight in this book is intentionally presented okay with a small session so that we may understand it's easy for us to understand and relate ourselves with Christ and see how better we can grow to lead our life in Christ okay so is there any questions or is there anyone who would like to share any insights just taking the online class okay is there anyone in the class that you would like to share your insight of who you are in Christ online students as well as offline so yes as we journey together we will go take it a little slow so that it's good for us to understand and apply it in our life so this class is more something that we learn to apply in our life and try to be more like Jesus and have this mentality of Christ saying that our identity is in Christ who we are this who we really in Christ so with that I would encourage one person from our offline class to pray and one person from our online class to pray can I request one student from our offline to raise your voice and pray I have shown you would like to pray yeah heavenly father thank you very much for gathering all of us today this class thank you very much i've understood your word and he is my daughter's class any father please i wish to understand more what you're learning father to keep you are learning father and please help us to know who we are in you any father she's saying pray can I request one student from the online to raise your voice and pray yes please krisha you can unmute okay okay krisha I think we're not able to hear you that's okay I'll just pray and end the session with the word of prayer heavenly father we come into your presence with heart of thanks and praise Lord we thank you for the work that Jesus did on the cross for each of us and Lord we pray that I submit each student in your hand and we pray that our identity will be placed in Christ and help us Lord to have this mindset in us as we journey together studying who we are in Christ is who we are we'll have this identity we have this mindset like Christ life as a father Lord I pray that you will enable us to live a life that pleases you in Christ Jesus name we pray amen thank you for joining in to our session today thank you and god bless


When I was at the Democratic Convention, when Obama was nominated, there were a bunch of senior officers that had come in support of Barack Obama. And they were all on stage there. And I looked out among these senior, these generals, and I noticed one guy that I knew.  And they had all gathered there, and they were showing their support for the Democratic nominee. And not one person in that stadium stood up to applaud them. I did. I guess there was a smattering of applause for these men. The right thinks they own this story, these people, whether they be troops, whether they be veterans, and we give it away to them.  After serving and protecting us. After putting their lives on the line, whether or not you agree with the politics is a different story, but they put their lives on the line. And more of them are dying now than died during combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.


In this video, let's derive the expression for intensity in the Young's double slit experiment. So we'll derive expression for intensity of the resulting wave. And we'll do that as a function of its phase difference. Phase difference is usually denoted by phi. Now just a quick heads up, this most of this video is gonna be visual. So a way for you to logically visualize what's going on. All right, so let's begin. You may be by now familiar with the setup. We have two holes and there's a light source behind it. And the light hits the two holes. They act like coherent sources of light. And then the light meets on the screen at different different places to produce an interference pattern. And what we want to do now is figure out when they meet at every point, what will be the intensity or the brightness of the light? That's what we need to figure out. How do we do that? Well, intensity of any oscillation, intensity of any oscillation, I'm just gonna write I, turns out to be proportional to the amplitude of the oscillation squared. To the square of the amplitude of the oscillation. And don't worry, we'll visualize all these complex terms. We'll do that in a second. But because I want to calculate, because intensity is proportional to amplitude squared. That means to figure out the intensity of the light here, I need to figure out what will be the resulting amplitude when the light meets. And so let's just assume that the amplitude of the waves produced by these is A. So then we'll figure out what the resulting amplitude is going to be when they meet. And we'll be able to figure out when you square that, we'll get the resulting intensity. All right, now before we begin, a lot of complex terms. Let's start with something. Let's start with coherence. What do we mean by these sources are coherent? Here's how I like to visualize it. Coherent sources means that their phase relationship is locked in time. Here's what I mean. So if you were to look at these oscillations, notice they are in sync with each other. But what's important is that is locked in time, meaning forever they will be in sync with each other. That's coherent sources. And this is another example of coherent sources. Over here, notice when one thing is, they're oscillating in the opposite direction. Why are they coherent? Because, again, that relationship stays locked in time. They will always oscillate in the opposite direction. Get that? So that's the meaning of coherence. Phase relationship is locked. All right, let's consider the simplest example of coherence. The one in which they are oscillating in sync with each other. And if these are sources of light, they will start producing light waves. And these light waves are in three dimension, but it's easier to visualize in one dimension. And now, this distance, the distance of the peak from the mean position is what we mean by amplitude. And if you square that, that represents, or it's proportional to the intensity of the oscillation or the intensity of the wave, okay? And if these waves are going to hit a point on the screen, imagine this is a point on the screen, then the waves are gonna make that point oscillate as well. And notice, that point will oscillate with the same frequency as this one, and it'll have the same amplitude. Can you see that? Same amplitude. Now, what we are interested in is what happens when they meet at a point on the screen. Then what happens to the resulting amplitude? Well, over here, notice their individual contributions, their individual oscillations are in sync with each other. Can you see that? Because this distance and this distance is exactly same, these two pictures are identical, these two oscillations end up becoming in sync. And so, if these two were to meet at one point, let me show you that now, then the resulting, the resulting oscillation would have twice the amplitude. Does that make sense? Look, each one has amplitude A and they're in sync. It's like two forces which are in the same direction, the resulting would be twice that. And so, the resulting amplitude would just be two A and the square of that would be the intensity, right? But here's the thing, in this example, these two waves travel the same distance to meet, but that's not always going to be true and that's what makes things interesting. So, let me show you what I mean. If you consider a point over here where the two light waves are meeting, then notice this one has to travel a shorter distance and this one has to travel a longer distance. Now, individually, they will not be oscillating this particle in sync with each other. Again, let me show you that. Again, here we go. This time I've kept the yellow closer to the particle compared to the blue because that's the case we're dealing with, yellow closer to the particle compared to the blue. Because of this, you will see that the wave from the yellow will reach the particle first. And as a result, before this particle starts oscillating, this would have finished some number of oscillations. And so, we say this has a phase difference compared to this. And how do we calculate that? Well, if this has finished one extra oscillation compared to this, we say it has two pi extra phase. One oscillation corresponds to two pi extra phase. If it has half an oscillation extra compared to this one, then we would say it has pi extra phase and so on and so forth. Every extra oscillation corresponds to two pi extra phase. And because there is a phase difference, notice they are not oscillating in sync with each other. So in general, when the two waves meet on the screen, the two particles may not oscillate in sync, which is their contributions may not be in sync. That's what I want to mean. And because their contributions are not in sync, now comes the question, what happens when they meet? Well, when they meet, because their contributions are not in sync with each other, the resulting oscillation will not have an amplitude twice. It can have any amplitude between zero and two way, actually. And so, our goal now is to figure out what that resulting amplitude is in general, because the square of that is going to be the intensity. So how do we figure that out? There are a couple of ways to do that. One is algebraic, another one is vectorial. Vectorial is visual, so let's do that. There are a couple of ways to do that. One is algebraic, another one is vectors. Now I like vectors because again, we can visualize it. So let's do that, one more, one last visualization. So the idea is you treat oscillations as a rotating vector. It's an imaginary vector. If you've studied alternating currents, same idea, we use phasors over there, it's the same thing. The whole idea is you draw a vector which has the length equal to the amplitude of the oscillation and it's spinning at the same rate of the vibration, so same frequency, okay? And you set that up in such a way that if you were to shine light from the side horizontally, whatever shadow gets casted on a wall, imagine there's a vertical wall over here, the tip of that shadow represents the position of this particle. That's how you represent a rotating vector. At any point, notice, right now, if you cast a shadow, sorry, shine light, you cast a shadow, again, the tip of that represents the position of this. Now why this is important because now I don't have to look at the position, I don't have to look at the vibration oscillations anymore. This vector, if I know what the vector is doing, I automatically know what the position of my particle is. And vectors are easier to add, at least compared to oscillations when you're adding oscillations. So what we're gonna do now is we're gonna take another vector for this one. And when these two waves meet, we're just gonna keep these two vectors together. So they're gonna meet now, there we go. And all we have to do now is figure out when you add these two vectors, what happens to the resultant? That resultant will represent our resulting amplitude. Does that make sense? That's what we need to do now. And what does the angle between them represent? The angle between them represents the phase difference. If the two particles were oscillating in phase, these two vectors would be in line. If the two particles were oscillating in the opposite direction, then these two would be opposite to each other, giving a phase of 180 degrees. So can you see that the angle directly represents the phase? And so I know how to add up vectors using the parallelogram law. This now represents the amplitude of the resultant. And just to be clear, just that we are on the same page, what this means now is that if I run this animation, then the shadow of this one on the vertical wall that represents the oscillation or the position of the resultant oscillation. This is our resultant oscillation. So for that, all I have to do is calculate what the amplitude, what this length is, that represents the amplitude of this. And the square of that will give me the intensity. So let's set that up. Here is the first vector that represents the amplitude of the first wave, first source. This is the second vector that represents the amplitude of the second wave. The angle between them is phi. That's the phase difference when they reach here. And the resultant of that represents the resulting amplitude. So we know how to add vectors. We know the formula to calculate the resultant of two vectors. So why don't you pause the video now and figure out what the resulting amplitude is. All right, if you're given this a shot, let's see. The resulting amplitude is, how do you calculate?  So the square of the amplitude is going to be a squared plus b squared plus two a b. So a b becomes a square cos phi. Okay, now we just have to simplify this. I get a two a square here. There's a two a square here. I'll take that common. And what I end up with inside the bracket is one plus cos phi. Can I simplify this further? Yes, I can. Using trigonometric relation, one plus cos phi is two cos squared phi over two. And so if I put them all together, if I multiply them, I get the resulting amplitude square equals four a squared cos squared phi over two. All right, I have amplitudes, but I want intensity. Notice I already have amplitudes squared. So these should be proportional to their intensities. So this is proportional to the resulting intensity. So I'll write as K times IR. IR is the resulting intensity. I'm writing K because this is not equal to, right? There is some proportionality constant. Similarly, this is proportional to the intensity of the incoming wave. So it'll be K times I naught times cos squared phi over two and the K cancels. And I get my relationship. I now have the intensity. The resulting intensity becomes four times I naught times cos squared phi over two. And notice I found what I wanted. I now have the expression for the intensity as a function of phase difference. In another video, we will play with this equation more and we'll get a deeper understanding of what really happens to the intensity when the waves interfere. But for now, just reflect on how we derive this. We spent most of the time visualizing and the math was just last few minutes. So what I like about this method is if you can visualize properly what's going on, you can derive most of that stuff with practice in your head, which means I don't have to remember any of these equations.


Okay, everyone, and welcome.  So I was not aggressive with this because it's rated right on the cusp. It rated 18 points. An 18, 19 is a 50-50 chance of working or failing and that tells me watch it, see if it sets up or don't be aggressive. So we did not watch this immediately and I didn't call the options trades immediately either. That was a good decision. You have people attempting to buy this that are day traders, it is not along. But I knew that was gonna happen and it happened in the open and it's happening right in here now. People are still trying to buy this. This is a short, it was a short, it was a nice short and we caught it at the exact perfect moment. I mean, I'm talking about exact. So we did this in here, got the drop. Boom, you could have got out. If you held it, again, boom, could have got out. In fact, the low in here, I think was 33. 320 33 in here this morning, it was 320 50. So this is a bearish gap down in Netflix that rated right on the cusp and that tells you, you gotta watch the setup first. But you should always watch for the setup. I mean, quite frankly, but we could not have gotten a better entry in this if we tried. So thrilled, thrilled to bits and pieces that this worked today because it was expecting a big move in it. I was right, I didn't know if the move was gonna be up or down. Anyways, nice move here for Netflix. Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful. Good luck everyone, if you're in the option and congratulations for ready to do the day trade. I think you should be out of the day trade just because of the fact you wanna make sure you book money on the day for the day trade. The option, if you wanna hold, it's up to you. But nice moves in here. Looking forward to seeing where the option goes. Market's falling today too. And boop, boop, boop, boop. So market should fall at least down to 190 today in the queues. Where did we get for the low? 69. So here's how I'm thinking this. Once Netflix breaks 220, which it hasn't done yet, but 220, a break of 220 and Netflix could go kaboomy and that could bring the market go like that and we could fall into the close. Netflix could fall into the close today. I'm seeing this all play out that everything's gonna fall into the close today. Market's gonna fall into the close today, Netflix's gonna fall into the close today. When Netflix plays 320, it's gonna pull the market down. Market's gonna fall into the close today. So I'm seeing a sell-off in the market today between now and the close. It's 12.15 Eastern time, four o'clock. That's what you should look for and I'm really good at these things, people, so I'm probably going to be correct. So good luck, everyone. If you're interested in the Golden Gap course, email me and Melissa at thestockswitch.com. Next class, and if you wanna get in for any season to get these trains, the Christmas Special Lens tomorrow for July Christmas, our Christmas in July, and the class is July 27th to 28th. Have a great day, everyone.


that this world is backwards and upside down. So we have things like, I would say, we call industrialized nations, what the world calls civilized nations, and then we have cultures like the Aborigines over there in Australia. In many cases, it's very telepathic. What the world would judge as very primitive.  Now, my journey has taken me to all these different countries, and the sneaky thing about the ego is that the ego invents a lot of rules and regulations and rituals in this world that are designed to minimize fear. Why do we have traffic signals? Why do we have prisons? Why do we have regulations and judges and so forth? It's to hold down fear. In other words, people, the belief is if we didn't have all these rules, the world would really be chaos. You think it's chaos now without some rules and structures. But what I've noticed is I've traveled around the world, is I've actually gone into some cultures in South America where they don't have such rules and regulations. For example, in Buenos Aires, it's a city of over 15 million people. 15 million, more than that, and they don't have stop signs. No stop signs. No stop signs in Buenos Aires. Now, I imagine practically speaking, if you were living in a city of 15 million people, with how many intersections? Millions of intersections and no stop signs. Now, what does this do? Well, what you would have to do is you would soon have to be what? Very telepathic. If you were a cab driver. And imagine down there, because the economy has collapsed, they didn't hold their currency contingent with the dollar and with other currencies, so their whole economy completely collapsed. And doctors and lawyers and teachers and professionals had to take up jobs like cab drivers. But it actually was an advance in their career to go from doctor to cab driver. Because you have to be telepathic in that place and you have to tune into the intuition. You see how backwards it is? And the cab driver, I had one cab driver who was so happy and peaceful that I was doing the Course in Miracles gathering. His name was Juan. I said to Juan, would you come in and speak at the Course in Miracles gathering? I asked the cab driver to come in and speak. And he said, yes, I would be glad. And he went in and he was very calm. He called it palatable of detachment the cab driver did. Now, what I'm saying is when we talk about civilizations and rules and regulations, it's kind of like the same topic of insurance, that you have to start to become more and more intuitive and get in touch with divine laws in your mind. And to do that, you will have to release these other ones. We've all been raised with the laws of nutrition, the laws of medicine, the laws of economics. Some of them, we know these laws like the back of our hands. We can tell you all about the body and nutrition and this and that. You know what? It's not going to get you into the kingdom of heaven. Because guess who made all these laws up? The ego. The ego made them all up. What's going to get you out of it is your intuition. Because 2,000 years ago Jesus said it's not what you put in your mouth that defiles. He was beginning to undo the laws of nutrition 2,000 years ago. It's your thoughts. If you're thinking without grievances and judgments, that's where your health starts with mental health. And you know what he says in the Course? He says all illness is mental illness. So if you follow him what he's saying is your health starts and ends with your thinking. It starts and ends. So all I've done in my life is I've been very honest. And I started to question all those laws of nutrition, of economics, of medicine. Exercise. I was trained in the laws of exercise. What happens if you don't exercise? What happens to muscles? If you don't exercise? We're told they waste away. We're told. But I find I had been a professional tennis instructor. I went to the gym. I did cardiovascular fitness and this and this. I'll tell you right now what's for me to turn around is to shift in my thinking. You know I had to learn even when I was going to the gymnasium to have holy encounters and to stand to perceive my brother as myself. Instead of focusing on their body, I had to learn a different way. Solid. Solid. Solid. Yes. What if your body is completely broken? Take my free cross. Take my free cross. Take my brother. Where your body has completely a problem that seemingly can't be fixed. What do you do with that? If you want to be able to get up and walk again or whatever. Is that still up here? That's where you stick in. You would start and you would end with mind training. In other words, it doesn't matter whether you seem to be in a wheelchair or not in a wheelchair, your mind goes with you wherever you go. What you could say is your mind training is something, when we talk about releasing your mind from judgments, I could tell you so many stories. I'll tell you one story of meeting a man in Argentina who was a paraplegic. I was meeting with a psychiatrist in Argentina and he finally, we were having lunch and he said, David would you like to meet my teacher? I said yes, take me to your teacher. We went down by this big river and there was a man who was about 26 years old sitting in a wheelchair and the psychiatrist who was probably about 55, 60, a very famous psychiatrist down there introduced the man in the wheelchair and said, here is my teacher. He has taught me more about life and love and forgiveness than anyone that I've ever met. Then I sat down and the man who was in the wheelchair and I sat there and we gazed at each other and I said to him, tell me your story. Tell me your story, you seem very happy. He said that he had been able to walk and he was able to walk and move around but when he was about 2001 he was diagnosed with a tumor on his spine and he was told that he would have to go in for an operation that was very risky and that he may not walk after the operation so he went under anesthesia on September 11th of 2001 and he went under anesthesia which would have been in the early morning hours of the United States and he went under anesthesia and while he was under anesthesia they operated on the tumor and when he woke up he had no use of his legs and he was in such a state of ecstasy and such a state of oneness and happiness that the doctors and nurses tried to tell him while you were under anesthesia terrible, terrible tragedy has occurred in the United States terrible tragedy and he could not comprehend what they were trying to tell him he told me from his wheelchair that he went through that experience when he was under anesthesia where it seemed like his ego was operated on instead of the tumor he said, I don't know what happened whether I was in a deep state of prayer or whatever but he woke up and he said his personality self his pride, his jealousy, his envy and everything had been lifted and he woke up in a state of ecstasy and his legs didn't work so this is quite an interesting terrible because he ended up becoming a teacher to many people in Buenos Aires it would come to him for spiritual training and counseling and yet his spiritual career didn't actually begin until he seemed to lose his life now, again, if everything is backwards and upside down in this world people ask me all the time about teaching and I say we really don't teach with our words we're used to thinking about that we teach with our attitude it's our attitude that is the teacher this young man, you know, people would say well, at least he could walk before he had this experience I say, what do you mean? At least he could walk his attitude is what's doing the teaching


Hello and welcome to this session, let us understand the following question which says, the total cost Cx in rupees associated with the production of x units of an item is given by Cx is equal to 0.007 x cube minus 0.003 x square plus 15x plus 4000. Find the marginal cost when 17 units are produced. Now let us proceed on to the solution. Given to us Cx is equal to 0.07 x cube minus 0.003 x square plus 15x plus 4000. Now differentiating it with respect to x we get d by dx of C of x is equal to 0.007 multiplied by 3x square minus 0.003 multiplied by 2x plus 15 plus 0. It is given to us that marginal cost is equal to 17 units. Therefore when x is equal to 17 that is the marginal cost d by dx of C of x is equal to 0.007 multiplied by 3 multiplied by 17 square minus 0.003 multiplied by 2 multiplied by 17 plus 15. It is equal to 0.007 multiplied by 3 17 square is 289 minus 0.003 multiplied by 17 to the 34 plus 15. It is equal to 0.007 multiplied by 289 multiplied by 3 is equal to 867 minus 0.003 multiplied by 34 plus 15. It is equal to 0.007 multiplied by 867 is equal to 6069 minus 0.003 multiplied by 34 is 0.102 plus 15. It is equal to 6.069 plus 15 is equal to 21.069 minus 0.102 which is equal to 20.967. Hence required marginal cost is equal to rupees 20.967 which is the required answer. I hope you understood this question. That's all for the session. Bye and have a nice day.


You've got your little phones that you're attached to, and I find that really terribly annoying when I'm walking through an airport and you're staring at your freaking phone instead of looking at where you're going in the airport. However, for those of you that like to watch streaming videos, some of the best hunting fishing you'll ever see, all the best from outdoor channel, sportsman channel, and the World Fishing Network, you can catch that on MyOutdoorTV. They've always got deals to see if you like it or not, and I think you're going to like it and subscribe to it, but there's usually a free trial at MOTV.


Hi, my name is Blaine Morse. I'm a member of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City. I'm the author of a paper in protein science called Simplifying and Enhancing the Use of PyMol with Horizontal Scripps. So PyMol is this molecular graphics program. That's why they use to view the structures of proteins and to prepare images for publication. It provides a squizz of control over the molecular scene through either options available through pull downs or through commands that could be entered on the command line or run through script files. These script files traditionally have a single command on a line and so you wind up with multiple commands on multiple lines. You have a vertical array of commands which you call a vertical script. This file is traditionally edited in an external text editor. The file has to be saved if the edits are made and then loaded into PyMol to execute the commands. This actually can become tedious because dozens of iterations or changes are often required before you have the final script, the final image that you want. So we found a workflow that's one step shorter. This is the process we call horizontal scripting. The commands can be arranged in a horizontal array with semicolon separating the commands. This row of commands can be copied and pasted onto the command line that's immediately below the command history window across the top of the PyMol GUI. It's the command history window that has a white background. So that command line will accept commands or paste it into it and likewise you can copy commands out of it. So if you have long row of commands, they will extend beyond the right edge of the window available for the command line. This is not a problem because you just enter the command control E and it will move the cursor to the end of the line. If you enter the command control A, it will move the cursor back to the right end of the line and it does this instantly. And then you can use the mouse to move the cursor to specific sites to make your edits. You then hit enter to execute the commands and you see that results in the viewport down below. You use up arrow key to bring back the previously executed commands. So this process is steps shorter since you're not saving the commands to a file and it's more convenient on laptop computers because you don't have to have a second GUI window open for the text editor. So we ran into a couple limitations, our challenges. The first one was that you can't have the label command. Can't have more than one label command and that label command has to be at the end of the horizontal script. If you have multiple labels that you want to add, then you can source those from a file with the at symbol and that can be included in the horizontal script. Then the other issue has to do with the molecular scene settings. This is a 18 element matrix. It can be printed into the command history window by typing get on the score view. The default format is very tedious to edit into a compact format suitable for pacing on to the command line. So I wrote a program called roundview.py. This is a Python script that has the roundview function. You can type roundview and you will get back the 18 element scene settings in a very compact format on a single line. It's easy to copy from the command history window and paste on to the command line. This roundview.py script is available from the EasyPyMol website at GitHub. So EasyPyMol is one word, GitHub is one word. If you search for those two words in Google, you should find this site. On the site you'll find links to YouTube videos that describe how to install the roundview.py script on the Windows operating system on Mac and on Linux. You'll also find there are additional scripts that are described in the paper in Protein Science. One script is actually an exam that I give to students. In that script there are 10 horizontal scripts that are each mapped to an alias. For example, Q1 for question 1 down to Q10. So a student will enter Q1 and get the scene for the first question and they'll also get the question printed to the command history window.  They can focus on answering the scientific question that they have to address. This enables them to really harness the power of PyMol without having to, while still being novice users. So may you go forth and enjoy applying horizontal scripting to your own work. If you have any questions feel free to send me email and thank you very much for your interest.


Has anyone else noticed how desperately the media is trying to bury or otherwise discredit the information coming out from the so-called Obamagate transcripts? You might even be watching and wondering what the hell I'm talking about because you watch MSNBC and CNN and think this is all just a right-wing conspiracy. Funny how the only real scandals are those involving Republicans, never Democrats. I'm glued to this stuff and even I have a hard time following all the legal jargon and how it all fits together. After all, who am I? Just some guy in an awesome quake shirt in his basement making videos. I'm also a guy with a channel that's constantly targeted by the censors at YouTube. And it's thanks to sponsors like MyPatriotSupply that I'm able to continue putting out content for this channel. Sorry for the interruption, I know how much you all love ads, but just give me one minute to tell you about this special offer from my viewers from this episode's sponsor MyPatriotSupply. Friends, we are living in a strange new world. These are not normal now, and they probably won't return to normal anytime soon. Food shortages will be the next shoe to drop. Will you be prepared? Or will you panic like everyone else when the grocery stores near you are out of food? Don't let the coming reality turn you into a victim. Make survival your top priority by building an emergency food supply today. I personally trust and use MyPatriotSupply. You can too. They're the go-to experts in emergency preparedness.  Right now, you can save $100 off a full four-week supply of their delicious and nutritious food that lasts 25 years in storage. You do not want to be unprepared when the next emergency or disaster strikes. Go to preparewithdronetech.com right now. That's preparewithdronetech.com. Act now while supplies last. Like I was saying before the ad, we need someone with some real credibility to explain Obamagate, not just for us, but for people out there that might not understand it and think it's just a right-wing conspiracy theory.  Robert Noir. He's a 35-year-old lifelong resident of Pennsylvania. He graduated from Clarion University of Pennsylvania, where he became part of the very first team of that university ever to get into the national debate tournament. Since then, he ran for District 12 in the special election of 2019 and recently became the host of Pennsylvania Patriots Radio on WEJS 104.1 FM, Williamsport PA. Robert, welcome. Go ahead and just tell all of us what Obamagate is really all about. I think that people, right, they're using it as a catch-all, right? So I always kind of hated the gate thing. But in this case, it makes sense. And the reason is the comparisons to Watergate. So the way I would define it is Obamagate, to me, is his weaponization of core institutions in order to go after political opponents. Now, the evidence that we're seeing is his attacks on Donald Trump. I think that we'll find out that he weaponized, we already know, for example, he weaponized the IRS to go against Republicans. Now, did he specifically order it or not? That's something we could get into. But that, to me, is what Obamagate is. We have all these core institutions, such as the IRS, the EPA, intelligence agencies. And instead of acting independently, they have acted as if they're just, as Eric Holder said, wingmen of Barack Obama, and they've attacked anyone who could be a potential thorn in the side to him politically or to his political legacy. And so now, are we including, yeah, what do you include in Obamagate? Are we just talking about Michael Flynn now? Are we talking about the whole Russia collusion hoax? I would say that I include all of that, all of the conspiratorial Obama setting up to spy on his opponents and then leaking to the press using his allies in the mainstream media, all of which to win both propaganda victories in the press, but also use the authority of the law enforcement and intelligence agencies in order to spy on his opponents. Yeah, I mean, the irony is, though, if we look at Watergate, what were what was the big deal about Watergate? Of course, you had Nixon destroying 15 minutes of tapes and lying about it. But the underlying scandal was a couple of buffoons from Nixon's team sought to spy on his opponent by rifling through a hotel room in the middle of the night, two people. Right. Now, instead of that picture, instead of that, if Nixon had weaponized the FBI, CIA and NSA to spy on every single thing his opponent was doing. So I guess this is Watergate on steroids. But I mean, so the gate thing makes sense in terms of this. But again, it's hilarious because the exact same people that still pat themselves on the back and say a Watergate was such a big deal. And the press finally did something to save America. They took down a sitting president, those same people, the people in the press, the Democratic parties, etc. They've done everything they can to propagandize Obamagate and allow to bury it, to justify it and things like that. So they're literally on the exact opposite side. And they keep saying they they keep saying like, oh, what Trump did. This is compared to Nixon. No, like what Obama did is 10 times worse than what Nixon did. Right. Nothing Trump was accused of was anything like this. Yeah. And I remember saying the same thing when the IRS thing was going on, because it was like it was using this institution to target his political opposition. And I don't want to get into a whole bunch of that. But it was pretty clear to me that there was shenanigans going on there when the director, when they wanted her hard drives of directors. Oh, oh, no, we destroyed those. We don't have any of that data, you know, and I guess it's not later. They did, but right. And the only reason that's worth mentioning that here is one to show how systemic this was under Obama. But second, because the defense that's given of Obama is and I find this incredibly laughable. But this is how Obama defends himself and other people defend him. The old, oh, I didn't know about that until I read it in the newspaper line. But so apparently, according to these people, Obama was the most clueless human being in the world. He didn't even know what average people like me and you knew. He was just sitting. Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know my IRS was targeting conservatives. Oh, even when I was in the Oval Office meeting with all these people that were unmasking Flynn, I had no clue. And what you see is it's not a condition where I think that Obama is sitting in a shady room smoking a cigar like, OK, lowest learner. Here's what I want you to do at the IRS. It was that he let it be known that they had a mandate because they're morally superior to us and they know more than us that they had a mandate to do whatever they wanted to make sure that their agenda got through. And that trickled down to every agency he had where they said, it's OK to be corrupt. It's OK to break the rules because we are the saviors of the world. We're doing what's right. So a lot of people, what you'll see now is a lot of CNN, MSNBC. The next step is just going to go with the few bad apples theory, which is, oh, Obama didn't know. Oh, the higher ups didn't know that Peter Struck's a bad apple. Maybe Brennan was a bad apple, but everyone else was great. And that's garbage. The buck stops here. It stops with Obama. He's the one who was in charge when all of this was going on. Yeah. And I just want to point out that's something going back to the Obama administration. People like me were pointing out all the times that Obama always seemed to somehow be separate from what was going on in the government. So we went from like the media, anything that went on, it was the Bush administration, Bush administration does it when Obama was president. Not only did they just like not report on things that were bad, but they would just generally say the government or something to that. Always to make it look like or seem like Obama was not involved with that. What exactly are these transcripts that were released by the DOJ? And, you know, what do you I don't know if you've looked over all of them or if you've seen everything that's juicy in them, but what do you like? What's your big takeaway from those? So what these transcripts were was Adam Schiff's been sitting on these and what they are their testimony during the beginning of sort of the House's investigation into Russia gate. And so they interviewed people from, you know, people like Brennan and Clapper. They also interviewed people in the Obama administration. They interviewed the head of CrowdStrike, which was the agency that looked and determined that Russia hacked the DNC and the FBI relied on. And what these were were transcripts that was just testimony of their interviews. There's nothing in it that on its own would seem that salacious. The reason that it's salacious is particularly because it was being withheld by Adam Schiff is that while all of these people such as Clapper and Brennan were testifying, we have no evidence that anyone in Trump's camp colluded with Russians in a legal way. We have no evidence that the steel, steel dossier is true. While shift is or while these people are being interviewed saying that and Schiff's privy to that shifts, then those same days going on national television saying, I've seen direct proof that people in Trump's campaign conspired with Russia to steal the election. That was a blatant lie. And the reason that Schiff is held on to these documents for so long was to withhold that fact from coming out to the American people.  If you were Jake Tapper, wouldn't you come out today and be like, look, Adam Schiff will never be on my show again. The guys, but instead they love Adam Schiff. Further proving they're not journalists at all. They're propagandists. Right. Well, and they are they're invested in this. They're they're deep in this, you know, need deep in the shit, as they would say. Like you said, they basically, whether knowingly or unknowingly, were used as props for propaganda to create this narrative. And the only way this works is with the media. And there's no other examples of this kind of thing.  Then he immediately calls with a clapper and then clapper goes on CNN. Or was it Brennan? I think it was Brennan. Yeah. What it had was Brennan worked for CNN.  You should really tell Trump about it. And so Comey allegedly, his original version we heard was Comey goes to Trump because Comey was worried that these salacious allegations would make it out in the press. So he talks to Trump and he says, oh, you know, I just want to inform. He doesn't say we think that you're a spy for Russia or that we think people connected to you or with Russia. He just mentions the P part. He's like, oh, this P documents out there. And I wanted you to know because CNN is sitting on it and we're worried they're going to run this story. Then word of that gets back to Brennan and CNN, who then use Comey's meeting is the excuse to run the story. Now, the reason this fits into what we were just saying, if you're James Comey at that point and we're taking you at face value and you're like, man, I really need to inform the president because I'm worried the press will run this if they find a reason. And then you find out someone in your team leaked that and they used your very words, James Comey's very words is the reason to run the story. Wouldn't you be furious if you're James Comey? But no, he's not furious. Instead, he's perfectly fine with it. And then we later find out that one of the reasons for that was he met with all the top brass at the FBI before the meeting with Trump that he claimed to all of us in America was just to brief Trump about this P dossier and they all decided to take notes and case Trump incriminates himself in some sort of crime. What was the alleged crime that Trump committed? I mean, this is the sort of nonsense that and that goes right in with the Obamagate theme, which is they were treating everyone like criminals with no evidence of it. And what the Democrats in the media will say is, ah, this is proof that the investigation was warranted because look, we've got these people guilty of crimes. But if you go back and you look at each individual case, like we could look at every single case and I could show you the corruption by every single person, I could show you the corruption behind. But what's the main theme? The theme was Russia interfered in our election and did Trump's team help them do that? That's that's what everything comes down to. And so when we go to the definitive answer, the three years of investigation answer, it was the Mueller report, right? That's where they're going to explain. Mueller was tasked with and we could get into exactly what he was tasked with. But what we were told, Mueller was tasked was investigating Russian interference, investigating whether or not Trump's team colluded with Russia and investigating whether there was obstruction of justice. But that investigating Russian interference, that was his prima facie task. He said, yes, they did interfere in two incidents. One was Russian trolls use Pokemon Go and Facebook to post ads. That's 50% of the interference people right there. The second was Russia hacked the DNC. Now, if we could prove that Russia didn't interfere, or if there are allegations that Russia didn't even favor Trump, the whole house of cards fall. And what we've been able to prove based on these documents have just been released is that's exactly the case. There is no proof that Russia hacked the DNC. We had to the DOJ had to leave those 12 Russian trolls off the hook because they had no proof they were working on behalf of the Kremlin government. And now we're finding out that John Brennan, director of the CIA, buried intelligence that showed that actually Russia wanted Hillary to win the transcripts. The transcripts are showing all these people basically said one thing during their testimony, and then they went out in the media and said another that was who all was that it was rice. With Susan Rice, we had Clapper was quoted as saying they had no proof Brennan said that there was no proof. And that what they're saying is when they're asked under oath and it's the cameras aren't on, they're admitting like, well, we don't have proof that anyone connected to Trump committed any crime. We don't have proof that the steel dossier was true. And this is a theme over and over. We actually saw it from years ago. We saw in Comey's public testimony in front of Congress that he admitted when they talked about the allegations in the steel dossier. He called it salacious and unverified. But at the time he was saying that his FBI was using it to get FISA warrants to wiretap people connected to Trump's team. So it's the public story. And you're exactly that's one of the reasons I love your channel is the focus on the media. People love to downplay. Now they say everybody knows the media is corrupt. That's not true. The media still sets a very like a threshold or it sets a bar for what a lot of people get to hear. It's not just the traditional media. Maybe it's Stephen Colbert on his show. Maybe it's Hollywood and what they say, but they control this narrative. And by controlling that narrative, they allow things that would outrage the average American to be buried or they make excuses for it. Let's look at the Flynn situation here briefly. So with Flynn, it's very difficult to understand what's going on. The first thing that came out here in this past month was we had proof from higher ups at the FBI admitting, asking the question in their own notes, what are we trying to get from the interview of Flynn to get him to lie so we could get him or do we want the truth so we could get him locked up or fire? Now think about what this means. Just forget about the fact that it's the FBI. Think about local law enforcement. Just think about this for a second. Say law enforcement thinks some sort of crime was committed, they think the local pizzerias running drugs out of it or something. And so they wiretap that pizzeria and they have transcripts of all that pizzeria's phone calls. And none of it shows evidence of any crime whatsoever. Can you imagine then your local police going, well, there's no crime here. I know. Let's get that pizzeria owner in here. Ask him a bunch of difficult questions in the hopes that we could get him to lie in some way. That way we could cause him to lose his business and go to jail. That's nonsense. That's exactly what they did to Flint. Right. And we know this. We know that that's what happened. And that's the tip of the iceberg. Yeah. So I know exactly what you're doing all this time. Like, like if they're not going to, if the Logan Act has not been prosecuted since its inception and we know that John Kerry is doing that very thing all the time, that's just another, another example of how this entire thing is a fraud. Right. And that's what me and you have said the entire time. I we're not just sick of fans that are like our side can do whatever they want. We've said the entire time if crimes can be proven connected to Trump or people connected to him, that's fine. Hold them accountable. Alls we ask is that that's applied equally to all sides. Well, and that's right. That's what Obamagate is. And even the judge in the Manafort trial admitted, you're not after Manafort. You're trying to tighten the screws on him as tight as possible, hoping that he'll flip on Trump because what was, why were they after Trump in the first place? Here's, here's what Trump's big crime was. You ready for this? Trump won the election. That's the crime, right? Trump wasn't the establishment's choice. And so he had to be made a lesson of, right? And so they raided his lawyers in the middle of the night. They wiretapped his team. They did all this crap, right? I mean, in the case of Roger Stone, the FBI actually contacted CNN. So CNN was outside of Roger Stone's house with cameras while they pulled a 70 year old man out in his underwear with 17 agents holding AR-15s. I mean, that's insanity. And then if you look at the juxtaposition, now remember, we're focusing on Obamagate in terms of the Russia investigation that's spying on Trump. And that's all good. But remember these same cast of characters to the T, Peter Strock, James Comey, Rebekah, Rosenstein, McCabe, the exact same cast of characters were in charge of the Hillary Clinton investigation. And so with the Hillary investigation is the first investigation I could see in the history of law enforcement in the world that was ran like this. I watch law and order and I see this is what they do. Oh, you're after the drugkin pin. Well, you get the guy in the street and you prove, hey, we caught you with bags of weed. You're going to go to jail for 15 years because of your priors, unless you have something to say about someone higher up than you. And thus, that's how they get to the higher up people. But this is what the FBI thought about. That's exactly what they did with Trump. But when it came to Hillary, they're like, here's what we'll do. We'll give everyone immunity, even though we know they committed crimes, we'll let them off the hook. We'll smash their devices that proved they committed crimes. Hell, we'll even let them delete subpoenaed evidence. And then once we give them all immunity, we'll say, hey, do you guys have anything to say negative about Hillary Clinton? And they were like, um, no, OK, case closed. That's what they did in the exact same people that you see to this day that are fighting tooth and nail for Flynn to still go to jail. Those people that entrapped Flynn were the exact same people in charge of the Hillary investigation that were like, we'll smash evidence. We'll give people immunity that we know committed crimes and not charge anyone. It's unbelievable. Why should people pay attention to this? And why is Obama gait real and not just the right way in conspiracy theory? Obama gait is don't get me wrong. The buck stops with Obama in this case. But what it is, is it's systemic of what's been going on for our government for more than 30 years. And what that is, is your vote doesn't matter what you, the normal Americans want don't matter. It's unelected bureaucrats. It's wealthy oligarchs and lobbyists, people like Bill Gates and George Soros. It's politicians that are only concerned about consolidating power. And it's on both sides of the aisle. You don't think that Mitt Romney and John McCain weren't just as involved as Hillary Clinton in this? Of course they were. This Obama gait is the clearest example we have of the amount of corruption. What they accuse you of is what they're doing. They say Trump was abusing power. They were literally using the most powerful investigative agency in the history of the world to spy on their political opponents. We talk about how Watergate's a big deal. That was two buffoons trying to spy in a hotel room on their opponent. Here we have the most powerful investigative agency that could tear apart your life. They could bankrupt you without you even charging you with a crime. They could look at any email or phone call that you've ever made. And they're being used as a tool by the establishment and the Obama administration. I say all the time, whatever your issue is, if you're on the left or right, if you're on the left, maybe it's climate change, if you're on the right, maybe it's Second Amendment. None of that matters as long as there are unelected bureaucrats that are actually controlling our government. Chuck Schumer said on Rachel Maddowell show right after Trump was nominated before he was sworn in that Trump should be afraid to criticize the intel agencies because they'd find six ways from Sunday of getting back at him. He was telling America, all of us, regardless of your right or left, that the most powerful elected leader of the free world has to be fearful of unelected bureaucrats because they run the show. And that should shock and frighten each and every one of us. And lastly, you see how this plays out and maybe you say, look, I don't care, I'm struggling right now. I lost my job or, you know, I'm fearful of this virus or whatever. And so you think that this doesn't matter, that this story doesn't matter. But I assure you the same establishment voices that lied to you for three years about Russia are the same ones controlling policy right now that are lying to you and fear mongering to consolidate power, to wipe out the middle class and to have this massive wealth redistribution and introduction of all these policies. Is it any wonder that the exact same things we were talking about about how the media going after fake news and wanting to censor voices like ours on YouTube that they use the Russia situation for that. And now they're using the covid situation from that. Oh, you can't say certain things about covid. And you're absolutely right, Ryan. This is war.  Rob, I think that we've summed it up probably or you have summed it up just about as eloquently as can be done in this amount of time. It really is going to fall on individuals, I think, to go out and just do a little bit of reading. Just get a little bit. Find some middle of the road source or just goes. I'll link the raw transcripts in this video. Go and just scour over them. Look at the parts with struck and page. Look at the parts about the fact there's no evidence against Flynn and they wanted the investigation was supposed to have been shut down.  Go and check it out for yourself. Go and check out Rob's channel. The guy is a machine. He is a fountain of information. He can teach you a lot. So I highly recommend you go check out his channel. I'll link that as well. So Rob, thanks a lot for being here and educating everybody. Oh, thanks. It's always a blast anytime. That's all for this episode. Please hit that like button, share and subscribe. If you'd like to support this channel, you can do so on one of these platforms and you can find all the links in the description or pin comment. Thanks for watching. Keep coming back.


In Afghanistan, Taliban officials ask the international community for help after an earthquake killed at least 1,000 people and injured more than 1,500. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un holds a meeting of top military officials in Pyongyang. One day after South Korea carries out its first successful satellite launch. In Israel, lawmakers vote to dissolve parliament and call early elections, after Prime Minister Naftali Bennett says his ruling coalition cannot continue. And Sri Lanka's prime minister says the country's economy faces a more serious situation than shortages of fuel, electricity and food.