Can it be done? The six legendary Superstar KO Squaw.  Buy Mug Coins is the best place to get Mug Coins for anything. It's cheap and reliable, and of course my code MMG is 15% off. The closest I have ever gotten is five legendaries and one altruist. So I have to try and draft three straight legends on my first three rounds, and then I have to get a legend every single round after, and go undefeated. So a lot has to fall in place, but I will sit here until it is done. Gentlemen, I now embark. It is 12-27. I will let you know when we finally get a three legendary squad.  Lawrence Taylor. I never get the second round. The second round is always the one that cucks me. Two. Don't get excited though, because as soon as there's nothing on the third round, I can't even play this out. Play it out, play it out, play it out, play it out. Square one. Two. Michael Strayhand beyond Sanders. I don't want to get excited. I don't want to get excited yet. Offense, give me Mike Vick, give me Mike Vick, give me Mike Vick. This is what my life has become. Literally farming legendaries in Superstar KO. This is my life now. Jim Brown. I would love if my team had Jim Brown. Come on, baby. Two, two, two, two, two, two. Two. Would Jim Brown? Please, please, please, please. I haven't gotten three yet. I've been here for so long. Three. One eternity later. I've been here so many times. Marcus Allen, one. Every time I've gotten John Randall, though I always get cucked on the third round. John Randall, Marcus Allen, offense. Oh, dude, I have two options. I think Jerry Rice is the right pick. That's three. It's finally time to play it. I think I'm rhythm. I don't even remember. I'm brain dead. Rhythm versus rhythm. And he has an offensive legend. So if I get offensive pick, I'm guaranteed. All right. Absolutely can't lose. Kind of mad I didn't pick the magicians because I would just RPO peek zone bubble cheese. But as we know, half back dive is very good too. Oh my God. Yep. Can I do this all the way down the field? All right. First in 10, right up the middle with Marcus Allen. I'm so worried that I'm gonna win this game and I won't get a legend. If I could get into the fifth and sixth round, it's almost guaranteed that my opponent's gonna have one of the legends I need. It isn't fully guaranteed, but those odds are so much better. This round is honestly the scariest one. Yeah. And I have no shame running only half back dive because I really would like to win. Oh, bounces right side. Get a juke. And I ran into a Vaughn Miller. All right. He's sending blitzes now. Do I have anything out of that same formation that's a pass? This could be good because he's expecting the same thing.  Got a wheel route too. Yeah. There's the blitz. Oh my God, it hit me so fast.  I blocked everybody. Damn. All right. We're gonna try that again, except I'm gonna slant Jerry Rice and Tyree Kill and I'll put Marcus Allen in the middle. Okay. He's not blitzing now. Marcus Allen's kind of stuck. Oh, there we go. Marcus Allen, muddy. Let's go. All right. Halfback dive right up the middle. Even with that blitz, we get dragged out for nine yards. All right. Second and one, same thing. Hold those blocks. Okay. Bounce them. First and goal. Marcus Allen has been a maniac so far. I think he can keep it up. Okay. There's Martinez.  All right.  I need this two point conversion. Oh my God. Incredible blocking. Now he's gotta hold them out of the end zone. Oh, he's passing. So he's definitely passing. Throws, that would not have worked anyway. We're sending a blitz right side. I doubt he halfback dives this on second and 15. Yeah. Didn't think so. I've got the middle locked up, but he makes a good pass to Austin Hooper. Good tackle. That was a very important tackle. Sending a very, very hot blitz on third and seven. Play action. Perfect time for it. Rifles it underneath, but Doug Martin's out of bounds. Fourth and seven. Fourth and seven.  Playing everyone straight up. He's got a motion. He goes with a pitch to Barkley. And he just barely gets across. Oh, this is a halfback dive. Yeah. He saw the sauce that I was bringing. Okay. I just can't get swerved here. I just gotta be able to make this tackle. All right. Good. That's all we needed. Just gotta keep out of the end zone. Might be the same thing. Oh yeah. A little halfback dive. We got in the backfield fast though. Second and 13. He is passing. I've got this covered. He goes underneath to the halfback. Damn. I expect to run. He isn't running it. I don't know why. No. No. Oh my God. He's really like about to score. All right. Halfback dive. Halfback dive. Everyone be ready for it. He's not halfback diving. Right here. Dude. I'm standing there holding why. I can't believe that. Are we really gonna have to go into overtime, bro? See if he halfback dives or if he does the same thing. Same thing. Same exact thing. He doesn't get it. Let's go. He was short by a yard. Oh my God. Now it's time to see if all of what we just did matters at all.  I would expect to see a legend here. I'm picking defense. Oh my God. Yes. Oh my God. He's not even a free agent. We get melt once. We're gonna do it. We're gonna do it. We're getting six right here. Okay. How many defensive players do I have? One, two and two offense. Okay. So I need a pick defense. I can take his Deon Sanders. If it's pick offense, I just got to pray I guess again. All right. First and 10.  Throw to the middle. Throw to the middle. And did. We're ending this so quick. All right. Keep to leave. Wait. All right. I don't take it to the house. All I gotta do is get a touchdown. Easy touchdown now. All right.   I wanna see if I can balance this to the outside especially against a blitz like that. Oh yeah. Here we go. Shoot down Deon Sanders. Harrison Smith can't catch me either. I'll see you later. Now we pray boys. Now we pray. Give me a pick defense. Give me a pick defense. I made it this far. I don't wanna do this again. I've been grinding for 40 minutes. Don't make me do it all over again. Pick defense. Defense. I have two D and two O. So it's a coin toss for D or O here. I want the D. No, no, no, no, no, please. Oh my God. Please just give me a legendary offensive player. Please just give me a legendary. Yes. Positive. Did he have Dallas Clark too? It says free agent. Oh wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Didn't the first guy I played have Dallas Clark? So does that mean I can get a free agent from either of the guys I played? That dude didn't have Dallas Clark, did he? Oh my God. We're gonna do it. All I have to do is win this game and we've done it. Wait, no, no, no. He doesn't have a defensive. He doesn't have a defensive legend. Oh my God. I'm gonna get to the final game and not get a legend. Unless it lets me take the D on Sanders from last game. Oh my God. I can't believe we actually have made it this far. Look at my offense, bro. I kind of want to get Dallas Clark involved, but I also kind of just want to win the game.  Let's go.  That's Superstar KO, bro. Let's get it. Just dusted two computers. That's why you don't let your computer do it, Captain Beast. Oh yeah. If I lost to someone named Captain Beast, I think I would just have to never play again. Ah. Let's get that two point conversion reader block. So easy. Six legendary squad. I'm doing it right now. It's time. He runs it right side to nothing. Enjoy the real estate of nothing over there.  Keanu Neal, come down on this run. Yup, that's a pitch. Left side. I know what you're doing. I've seen it all before, my friend. I'm here to get six legendaries, so you're not gonna beat me. Oh yeah, we're ready. Pitch right side. Can we get there, Mel Blunt? No, Blunt can't. Damn it. All right, more of the same, more of the same. Let's plan underneath and get ready for this run. Oh, it's a play action. I did not expect that, but he throws a terrible, an errant pass.  I really hope it lets me take the Dion Saner's free agent from the second game, because if it doesn't, we're in trouble. All right, he's got the pitch. Mel Blunt's on this side, and so am I. Let's go. Third and four. He's totally going with the run. It's the pitch to the left. Yes, we played underneath. Let's go. Is he passing finally? He is passing finally. He's probably looking right here. We've got everything. He just threw the ball away on four down. After I already scored, what are you doing? All right, now, just give me Dion Saner's. Dion, Dion, Dion. He has to be in here, right? Because I got the free agent Dallas Clark. I am going to kill myself if there is not a legend on this board. Legend, legend, legend. Oh my God, yes. Legendary squad. Let's go. I'm so excited. I have built it. I have done it. I have built the best possible superstar KO squad. And fine, if you want to get really technical, I think if I wanted the best possible squad, I would take Mel Blunt off the team and I would take Michael Vick. But I built the sixth legendary squad and now I can't even find a match. You're not even gonna let me play with the squad I just built.  If you can't find me a match now. Yeah, I think it glitched. I think it lagged out. I'm gonna give this five more minutes, but I promise you it lagged out. It never does this. The server just completely lagged out on my sixth legendary pick. I'm kind of pissed, but also I'm glad that I actually got to get my pick anyway. Like, I know that I got six legends, so. A few minutes later. Here's how you know it lagged out. Ready? I'm pressing B. I can't even quit. I'm stuck here. I can't believe they would do that to me on this round. It's like they knew. I think EA knew.  All right, well, that's the biggest cock block ever, but the team was built. You can see Dallas Clark, Mel Blunt, John Randall, Jerry Rice, Dion Sanders, Marcus Allen. All right boys, well, I can't even click anything.  I'm gonna have to close the Madden app. What a quality game. Ladies and gentlemen, I cannot thank you enough for joining this incredible superstar KO journey with me.  I also need to tell you guys this if you're still here at the end of the video. I tried to do this on many occasions. I have had times where I've got three hours where I could sit down and do this, and it hasn't worked. I'm recording on my computer that is three hours long where I couldn't do this, and I finally did it. I love you guys. Thank you for watching. This was sick. If you like it, maybe I'll try and do it again, but I'll see you next time. Peace out boys.


فشرف بالشتغالي بالعلم ولا تبغي به ما عشت يا بابا دلا وياله من شراف عظيمي Okay سؤال إمام البخارير رحم الله يزعانا بهريرة عنه عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم الإيمان بضع وستون الشعبة We mentioned what the word بضع means فلا بيث في السجنى بضع سينين We said it is what فالبضع ما بين ثلاثين وإلاتس is from three to nine odd numbers وزالا سلوهم من بعد غلبهم سيغل يبولا في بضع سينين Okay There's a rewire that إمام مسلم narrated which is better which is زيادة Add additional things that بخارير didn't mention here which is what He says after he says الإيمان بضع وستون الشعبة he says فأفضلوها the highest of it Okay Okay Somebody whose car is B10 Sorry BT-07XLC Mercedes They are blocking a car ولا ليالقفكي وتبعبور قان ونبركي سيهي BT-07XLC حكا دا قادي يمشه قف با بوكي سيهي بلغرينو يا أف سمالي يوفي عاي سمالا يا My Somali is good right Excellent In the future I might start to teach in Somali بضع وستون الشعبة So إمام مسلم has a narration which says which is a زيادة that we don't find it's an additional meaning benefit that we can take from it that we won't find it in the narration of Bukhari which is فأفضلوها قول لا إله الله The best of it is the statement of لا إله إله إله وقدناها إماطة الأذة عن الطريق والحياء من الإيمان So this gives us it tells us that لا إله إله is the best أفضلوها the greatest and the best is لا إله إله إله إله That's good That meaning also brings that the إيمان And it also shows us that إيمان its levels and brothers were not all the same Somebody will just stick to the أصل الإيمان Somebody Mashallah will come with واجبات And somebody Mashallah they will start going for extra additional things Allah also mentions in the Quran ثم أورثن الكتابة الذين أصطفين من عبادنا فمنهم ظالموا للنفسي ومنهم مقتصد ومنهم سابقوا بالخيراتي بإذن الله The people are not of all same level Somebody is just going to come with that what would just keep them as a believer Another person will say No, I want to come with what is obligatory And not only just become A Muslim But I will do That which is obligatory on me And another person will say No, I just don't want obligatory I don't want فمن ذو حزيحة عاني الناري وإدخل الجنة تفقى دفاز That anyone who is protected from the Hellfire And he is taken to Jannah is saved No, that's not all I want I want for the dose I don't just want to be saved from the Hellfire I actually want to go to Jannah And I want to be in the highest level of Jannah Because the Prophet said إذا سألتم الله فسألوه for the dose If you ask Allah for Jannah Where should you ask Our religion is teaching us To have lofty aspiration High aspirations Muslims are not people Who are happy with minimum We're not like that Our Prophet is teaching us Set yourself high goals Set yourself high goals Don't just say When I enter Jannah So don't say that But ask for the highest station In Jannah That's how we are So when you hear That the Eman is of levels Don't stick to absolute Eman Come with me Because if you don't Come with Kamal Then you You might enter the Hellfire For a while So the benefits That we took from this hadith Is number one That the Eman is of different levels The first benefit That we took from this hadith Is That the Eman is of different levels The second thing That we took from this hadith Is the virtue of shyness How important it is To be shy A lot of people They don't give importance To shyness And we're going to expand Very soon God willing We're going to bring a hadith Of the issue of shyness God bless you God bless you God bless you إن الله حيون كريم God is shy And he's generous So Our sisters are Bloss shyness Our brothers have Bloss shyness You know I remember when I was young And I would go And pick up my youngest sister From school sometimes Secondary school I used to Hate picking her up from school Because I used to take the bus I don't know about Leicester But London You go on the bus And you see the school kids Coming on the bus The girls The way they shout And the way they act And the way they are I used to hate it It was the worst time The day for me To just go pick up My sister from school No shyness The girls Shout from one side of the bus Let alone If you go If it's a double decker bus And you go on the top deck Like Yeah It's very sad God And sometimes when you look At the person Subhanallah It's a Muslim All this time they go We shine from the back It's a Muslim The whole bus You can hear from downstairs Screaming with her friends You go to bus stops You see Shocking things إخواني حياة Shyness The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم He says إن من ما أدرك الناس من كلام النبوة الأولى إذا لم تستحي فثنع ما شئ We don't have shyness Do what you want What does it mean Do what you want Meaning if you don't have shyness There's nothing stopping you What can we say to you If you're not shy Then there's really nothing going to stop you You're just going to dwell In every evil there is Shyness is a thing That holds the person back And makes them think Before they say something Or before they do something So shyness is something That boys have to come with It's not only sisters حياة Shyness You see It's not shyness To see a brother Sagging his trousers You see his trousers So back And so low That's not shyness man Have respect to the people Who surround you A woman A Muslim Shouting from one side of the road To the other side She just Because she wants to talk to somebody That's not shyness That's not shyness So حياة is very important But it was said about the Prophet The Prophet was more shy Than a virgin Who never left her room The Prophet كان أشد حياة من البكري في خذرها The Prophet was more shy Than a virgin girl Who never left her chamber عليه صلى الله عليه وسلم Shy Whenever the women would ask So many questions They knew that the Prophet Would be shy So they would say Before their question إن الله لا يستحيل من الحق They want to ask him Very detailed Explicit questions So they say Allah is not shy Allah is not shy So can you ask this question For the Prophet And sometimes the Prophet Would be so shy That عائشة Would grab the woman By the hand And she would take it And say This is the ruling رسول الله will be shy So a nation who Shyness is taking from them عمل قبول قلوب is missing from them They're very ill This community Worrying If you're not shy And of course The shyness I'm speaking about Is not the shyness That stops you From doing good The shyness That makes you do good And achieve good That's not what we're talking about Are you with me What did the poet say And what did the scholar say They say المستحي والمتكبر لا يتعلم The arrogant And the shy person Don't learn Now you are sitting here You're listening to the ders If later the question Answer session starts And you have a question Don't be shy To ask your question و لذلك عائشة رضي الله تعالى And she said رحم الله و نساء الأنصار ميلاب ماسي Upon the women of the أنصار لم يمنعون الحياة To teach us Shyness did not stop them From learning الله ماسي For them They know the religion They asked So it's It's not shy It's the shyness That doesn't make you fall Into evil But the shyness That makes you do good Sorry, the shyness That stops you from good It's not a praise Where the shyness Okay And a lot of the youngsters If you look at them When they're with their parents They're so shy like this But in school In school My mom used to I was in a bad boy When I was young I mean I was scared But my mom When she goes to school But I would not speak much In at home I've just been quiet When I was in school I had friends I talked with my friends You know sometimes I get carried away in the classroom Teacher would say Yo, be quiet I'm the man, be quiet And I might whisper And get in trouble for it So sometimes my teacher You know Parents evening Does it still exist Parents evening They still have it right So my mom When they tell her She'd be like What, it's like this My son is like this Because at home I'm an angel You youngsters know that When you're at home You're so nice I was in the room I was in the car So what do you do Your Facebook all day Yeah But when you go outside You're different You're a total different person You're living two different lives At home You come across it in a different way But like that's why It's a parent To observe their children Every situation they're in Because they act different When they're with you And they are different When they And when they go out And they see their friends Something comes out Energy comes out And they act different Isn't that the case Or am I just Snitching on you guys For no reason Yeah Isn't that the case It's the case It's the case The other benefit That we take from the حديث Is that This individual By the name of Abyssalih Who narrated From Abu Huraira That his name is what His name is That's the most famous one And that's the majority Of the narrations comes from him Now Chapter A Muslim is the one Who avoids harming Muslims With his tongue And his hands Narrated by Abdullah Ibn Amr And رضي الله عنهما That the Prophet Said A Muslim is the one Who avoids harming Muslims With his tongue And his hands And a محاجر An immigrant Is the one Who gives up All that Allah سبحانه وتعالى Has forbidden بابن المسلم منسلم المسلمون من لسانه ويده بابن Chapter المسلمون The word المسلم Is أي المسلم كاملوا الإسلام A person who is Islam is complete That's what The reason why we say that Is because If the person leaves this They don't become a disbeliever The comparison Who is a true Muslim True Muslim Is the one who is what منسلم المسلمون Anyone who the believers The Muslims Find from you Safety من لسانه Your tongue ويده And your hand You don't harm the Muslims You don't verbally harm them And you don't Physically harm them You don't harm the Muslims Physically And you don't Verbally No one will ever hear A statement You said about them يا إخوة This is important And a person's statement Is not You're not going to Speak He's speaking about people And causing them harm By backbiting them Behind their backs Or speaking about their Honor Or their family Or their people And Muslims never And his statement Will never reach anything He said bad about you Also he won't Physically harm you He won't He won't physically harm you So the believer should be One who's far from What do you call it Harming the Muslims And being what Causing the Muslim The Muslim people harm Are you with me brothers Like the people Find safety from you Find safety from you Well they don't look like The prophet said Who will give me assurance بين الحيي وما بين فخدي أضمن له جنة Who's going to give me safety Of what's between His two lips And what's between His two thighs I will promise him جنة Your tongue Promise me You're going to protect your tongue Promise me You're going to protect Your private part You're not going to come And I will promise you جنة So watch what your tongue This organ That you think is very Mashallah Smooth and fast And you can speak Be careful إحفظ لسانك أيها الإنسان لا يلدغنك إنه ثعبان كم في المقابل من قتيل لسانه كانت هابوا لقاهوا شجعان Well I protect your tongues إحفظ لسانك Protect your tongues How many people because Of a statement which they said It was a cause of their death Or it became a reason Why something happened to them This is a thعبان This is a snake This is a very dangerous organ و لذلك The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم He said إن العبد لا يتكلم بكلمة من رضوان الله من سقط الله لا يلقي لها بالا يهوي بها في نار جهنة A person who says a statement That angers Allah He doesn't really understand What he just said The volume and the weight Of what you've just said You don't realize it But because of that You're dwelling in the alfaya So much Be careful و لذلك عطابنا بربح When they spoke to him And they said How have you reached the station Which you reached He said I never spoke a statement Except I asked myself 70 questions before I spoke I'll ask myself How can I say Shall I not Shall I not Shall I not The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم Was asked من نجاه حديثه عقبته من عامر The Prophet was asked What success And what did he say From the person What success From the things That the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم The Messenger mentioned Was what The person who gets control Over his tongue Is the person who is successful Who makes sure He has control Over his tongue He knows what he's watching What he says و لذلك The Prophet also told us That a person does not Wake up in the morning Except He's the body To كفروا لسانه It will speak to the tongue إتقلها فينا في الله In our affairs فإن استقمت إستقمنا و إنع و ججت و ججنا في الله If you are steadfast We're steadfast with you And if you deviate And you go corrupt We're gonna be corrupt with you In other words I fight Start from a speech So if you Insult somebody That a hand is gonna say I'm just gonna I'm gonna join in I'm gonna have to physically finish it off Right So fear Allah in what you say Make sure you watch what you say Or else We're gonna go in it with you And if you're good We're gonna be good with you صح Very careful So a paliba Watch his tongue And he watches his actions That he does to the Muslims Watch his it No حدثنا عادم ابن أبي إياس عادم ابن أبي إياس العسقلاني And his name is هو من كبار مشايخ البخاري He's from the big teachers of أباب البخاري And he's from the شيخs of بخاري That allowed أباب البخاري To have what is known as الثلاثيات Are you there? أباب البخاري Actually has three narrations And this is By the way The سانيدة عالي And Nazl The chain is short And when it's long The حدث They used to fight for this I mean imagine having The shortest chain to the profit This is something you die for right And Imam البخاري has that He has three chains Three individuals Whereas أليمام المسلم The shortest he has is four He could have got it He could have got it Through who? أبض الله من المسلم أت القعنبي If my Muslim narrated from أبض الله من المسلم أت القعنبي Then Imam أليمام مسلم قد حدث الثلاثيات But the reason why he didn't do that Is because He was running away from who? هاية Who is he running away from? لا أبض الله من المسلم أت القعنبي أبض الله من المسلم أت القعنبي Is running away from an individual Who he doesn't want To narrate from Is وردان Yeah سلامة من وردان نعم Is running away from سلامة من وردان Who is متكلم فيه Who is basically questioned نعم So Muslim إن صحيح المسلم If you read it You're never going to find تلاثيات The short is that Imam مسلم هذا رباعيات أس بخاريه هذو تلاثيات تربيه هذو تلاثيات تربيه is the stool of مسلم أني هذو تلاثيات بخاريد مسلم doesn't هاية حدثنا قل حدثنا شعبة شعبة is أبو الحج أبو بصطام العتك شعبة أبو حجج العتك رحمة الله And he was أمير المؤمنين في الحديث في زمانه ومكانه when he lived He was the first person who actually bought in place this science that's known as الجرح التعديل Criticizing a narrator I'm praising a narrator He actually made a فن المستقل after he started to research into a narration in which he was looking into His name is who His name is what شعبة شعبة شعبة عتكي موله نعم أنا عبد الله ابن أبو السفر واسمعيل رضا أنا الشعبي أنا عبد الله عبد الله شعبة his name is what عمر بنه شراحيل الحميري He's from the people of Hamdan نعم عالم جليل من علماء الإسلام وفقيه من فقهاء الأمصار And he's a تابعي He is a تابعي منه The companions from the companions عبد الله عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص رضي الله عبد الله عمر بن عاص is the صحابي وابوه صحابي He's a companion And so is his father a companion He's عبد الله And his father is who عمر بن عاص رضي الله So they're both what صحابياني جليلاني مشخوراني They are two companions that are famous and they are very honorable And عبد الله عمر بن عاص was the one who narrated the most narrations from the prophet Who narrated the most from the prophet Number one is who? No, عبد الله عمر بن عاص It's just we've received more narrations of عبد الله عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص He said what he say كان عبد الله عمر بن عاص يروي He used to narrate when I never used to narrate عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص عمر بن عاص حديد from the prophet when I was narrating because how many years was عمر بن عاص مسلم for before how many years was with the prophet Some scholars they said three and some said only four Four years he was with the prophet And he has the most but the difference between it is عمر بن عاص sat down to narrate He made his whole life to narrate the Hadiths of the prophet Are you with me? عمر بن عاص It was said He got carried away with عبادة عبادة He used to pray a lot He used to fast a lot He busied himself with himself So his narrations that have come to us is less in quantity than the narrations of Abu Hurayla But who narrated from the prophet more عبد الله بن عمر بن عاص So he is known as a zahid means a zuhad He was an aesthetic individual He boycotted this dunya He turned towards the hereafter And he used to be قليل الشأن He used to take little from this world Very simple clothing Very simple life رضي الله تعالى عنه وعن أبيه عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال المسلم من سلم المسلمون من لسانه ويده والمهاجر من هجر من الله عنه So here we take المسلم من سلم المسلمون من لسانه ويده we took والمهاجر is the person who migrates And who is a muhagir A muhagir is the person who migrates from what ما له الله عنه Not which Allah has Prohibity سبحانه و تعالى A muhagir A true muhagir is what من هجر منه الله عنه If you do hijra You boycott ور الله تعالى Prohibity from you And then There are three migrations The word hijra It comes in three meanings One is land One is Sims And one is an individual صح A person Are you there Hijra The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم Hijra never stops It's to migrate from the land Of the disbelievers And it's to migrate To the land of the believers That's when the person Fears for their religion And they can't establish Their religion The second one is Migration from The sins to obedience And this is what The Prophet said here What did he say من هجر منه الله عنه The one who migrates From the sins And there's another one called هجر هجر بفتع اله And that means You boycott a person And this is permissible باعتبار المصالح و المفاسد It is when you look at the benefits and the harms For religious reasons If a person is a criminal They commit sins And you fear And you know If you sit with them They're going to cause you harm You leave them And you boycott them Are you with me And you stay away from them But you can't boycott A Muslim For worldly reasons The Prophet said To us عليه السلام و السلام عليكم shouldn't boycott His believer Brother For more than 3 days So you have 3 days chance Boycott him for 3 days But after 3 days You have to come back And give him salams But who's the best From amongst you و أخيروه من لدي After 3 days is over The one who gets the most reward Is the one who starts The greetings So you need to After 3 days start Looking for him And see how he's doing But you've been given 3 days 3 days The believer That's wealthy But if it's For religious reasons Then of course It has conditions Stipulated to it رعا Chapter Who's Islam is the best Or Who is the best Muslim Narrated by عبي موسى رضي الله عنه Some people asked Allah's messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم Who's Islam is the best i.e. Who is a very good Muslim He, صلى الله عليه وسلم Replyed One who avoids Harming the Muslim With his tongue And his hands Before that أكي أمام البخاري يسر قال أبو عبد الله وقال أبو معاوية تحدثنا داود عن عامر قال سمعت عبد الله عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وقال عبد الأعلى عن داود عن عامر عن عبد الله عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أمام البخاري يفهم That There's another narration بخاري It brings for it نعم فضل بابن أيو الإسلامي أفضل هي بقال رحم الله بابو شابتا أيو الإسلامي أفضل What is the best Islam أمام What Islam is the best حدثنا سعيد يحيابن السعيد القرشي قال حدثنا أبي يحيابن السعيد القرشي الأموي And his father is of the level سعيد القطان And of that caliber نعم قال حدثنا أبو بردة ابن عبد الله ابن أبي بردة عن أبي بردة عن أبي موسى رضي الله عنه أبو موسى هي أبو موسى الأشعاري His name is عبد الله ابن قيس But he's been very he became very famous for his actual name كنيا أبو موسى الأشعاري نعم And he used to be a governor of عثمان رضي الله عنه So he commanded عثمان And his, the governor for كوفا And he is من أفاض الكصحابةرفazuje واثمهم ر� идет الله رضي الله تعالى as you know نِنه seatedィ نعم قاقد فقالوا يا رسول الله أيو الإسلامي أفضل فهي سيتقالوا يا رسول الله سبب الروايات it says قولنا يا رسول الله فقالوا is plural it means they said to the messenger they said to the prophet وقولنا means we said to the prophet أولي it's قولنا أبو موسى الأشعار he's referring to himself me and a group of the companions asked the prophet هيو because there's another رواية that says قولتو I said talking about himself نعم أيو الإسلامي أفضل what's the best islam now pay attention the best islam now pay attention you have to not just hear the hadith but understand what's the best islam what's the best islam قال منسلي من المسلمون من لسانه ويده the best islam is the person who the muslims finds safety from his tongue and his actions that's the best islam رسول الله was asked أيو الإسلامي أفضل what's the best islam you wanna know best islamis it is منسلي من المسلمون من لسانه ويده that the muslims finds safety from your tongue and they find safety from your hands you don't cause harm كفل أذع على المسلمين you don't do تكفير of the muslim you don't say the muslim you don't shed their blood you don't permit for yourself their honor and eat them flesh and backbite the muslims


Greetings to all of you and best wishes from Costa Rica, where I am currently on an official mission. From the North Pole to the South Pacific, climate change threatens people's livelihoods, communities, health, development, even their lives. Nowhere is this clear that in small island states and other members of the Climate Vulnerable Forum. The CBS exists because of one simple truth, climate change discriminates. Those most affected by climate change already endure multiple forms of discrimination, because of their gender, because of their economic status, because they are members of indigenous people or minorities, because they are migrants or internally displaced, because of their age, or because they are people with disabilities. Climate change discriminates on the basis of geography. Entire nations may sink beneath rising tides, while droughts, floods and wars strike others. Whole ecosystems and ways of being may cease to exist, and the worst affected are always the poor. To prevent the steadily worsening impacts of climate change, states need to strengthen their mitigation commitments and nationally determine contributions and disease. States must also cooperate with each other. We must reshape our global energy infrastructure, making safe, clean energy accessible to all persons. Existing state commitments require international cooperation, including financial, technological and capacity building support to achieve low carbon climate resilient and sustainable development, while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions. My office stands ready to support states and civil society to do more to protect the rights of those most affected by the climate crisis and to prevent the climate crisis from worsening. Your pledge of support for the possible establishment of a special rapporteur on human rights and climate change at the Human Rights Council is much welcomed. While the decision is ultimately up to the Council, your commitment signals the importance of climate change and climate action. And convinced that the presence, voice and leadership of members of the Climate Vulnerable Forum is critical to the drive for higher climate ambition and the realization of human rights for those persons most affected by climate change. We look forward to working together with you in this effort. Thank you very much.


What's up guys and welcome to trendy update up our SPM birds. Now on to the trending news today is Ben Paul am sani kutukia Tanzania. Ameza kongelia poma raya kwanza liye kwa mprinzi wakia Annalisa Mwe Guy from Kenya. And looks like Ben Paul is still in love with Annalisa. Nda kuna wilezea mbo na wile. Now Ben Paul alieza kfanya interview na journalist from Tanzania, Mila Daayo. Nda ameza kongelia marriage yak na wile livo kwa. Now we all remember Annalisa and Ben Paul got married in 2018. Lakin ilia marriage yao aiku kawi asana kusabago in 2019 a match they had to separate. Lakin i finalization na divorcei me malizika yuzi 2022. Lakin isisa Ben Paul aneza kuelezea he did not enjoy that marriage. And reason being akuna kupa na zile mboza kupata wa toto nini. That conversation was not the endomana na sema zile futza marriage yae aiku eza kuzi experience. Lakin isisa na kumbuka paliko social media of course Ben Paul aneza wakapu goals. Wali huwana travel across the world and taking very good pictures. Lakin i Ben Paul aneza kusema yae ea marriage ya na diwa ilikwa e izon diwa pigapicha pigapicha. To make a visuri and that was it. So clearly na aneza kusema piya he does not intend to bring anyone down. Aneza kuelezea tuvile mboe level kwa na na sema niga ma kuna mtu alikwa na program. Yeni kwa na program una diwa kuna intro na kuna outro. Kwei mwa sasa ina manisha niga ma Annalisa alikwa una na shule una maliza una patakazik shono lewa. Yeni ina kahime he was a part of that program. Lakin isasa kuna uto mepua na lot of rumas wakisema you know Ben Paul got a jackpot by getting married to Annalisa. Lakin isasa shoko on you. Ben Paul aneza kusema as a matter of fact he made less money when he was dating Annalisa as compared to the entire time in his career. So clearly he wasn't growing financially like so many people thought. Lakin isa piya badewa tuha nuliza kwa alikwa mila daya kawulizo wa while you the one paying the bills ame ilikwa Annalisa ame ilikwa na divide. Yoni kitu mbae o Ben Paul aneza kujibu na a kasema Annalisa kwa rei ni kujibu ata eza kua dia. Ayabasi ata mimi nge taka kujua na jua piya weo unge itad yunge taka kujua. Lakin isasa kuna story ame afa Ben Paul ameza kulizo wa Annalisa kiku text leo I miss you uta eza kum jibu ni ni. Hei Ben Paul ameza kusema ntejibu thank you. Si joi story unayonaji lakin ibasi Ben Paul ameza kuelezea reason ameza kusema ea ni aya acha kumpenda Annalisa. Ni kwa mba he was dedicated and so in love with her kwa evo kusema ea ma pensime isha ata kua kidogo anadanganya na ege hataki kungia wogo. Nadia piwa nadiuli zambona waka wachana Ben Paul ameza kusema it was not a cheating kama fili ameva wato lukwa na eza kufikiri ya. It was just so many other issues ameza walu kua naso. Lakin ni piwa akaulizo wa uzuri domingi amaubaya domingi katika kulem pensi wakwa kitapo. Ni sohli ameza u Ben Paul ameza kusema ea kusema yupo tu. Hei hei. Kwa evo si joi helo nama nisha je labdo emsi kluzea duneza wuka translate utwambia what do you think that means. Lakin ni keza kumali zia pale Ben Paul ameza kulizo would you get back with Annalisa? Aka sema by the time that happens a lot has to be done vikao lazima view a vingi sana for us to go back to being together. Lakin ni piwa aka malizia kusema you know it can never be the same. Lakin ni oni kusema Ben Paul you point love bad o tu na Annalisa kwa evo ni kama. Hei ina sema ato awilo medifuni kaduwe module suweze wka ingiliya kwa sababu you never know. Ioni interviya kemi ladayo na piya pale of kosa meza kulizo a weight loss journey a Annalisa. Ata eza kwangile aka maamefa niya surgery or not lakin ni Ben Paul. Ame shika ishima ake pale na kusema Annalisa kwa reni kwangi ata eza kwa elezea. Mina taka ni kusome comments pale kuna ato awilo asha tu ameza kupiana manelo. Bakari naia aka sema huyo alifu acha pesa tu ee jamani. Amina naia ake sema kwa kwa elu kiskiza Ben, bado anampenda Annalisa sa weightu jamani. Kuna kusome heana kuna muadadamu ale umbu amka milifu. I agree with that statement of Amina. Alafufadili na na sema kaka kafanyu eile kitu tayari. Inaito aje karakta developmenta mando nini. Aya kuna awara ka pale, na sema kusha onamoto unawa kakable ando usidanim kifunga ando utampoza. Yan indo mara ita kwa moto mara saba. Nani kimalizia naia pale, na sema je Ben, anna eza kujibu asusha pigwa na maneno sana. Anakakutawala sana ndoma na unawaza. Alafufadili na kimalizia pale, na sema usicheze na wakenya. Aya maniso usipanzuriyo. Lakinimia, I want to know what are your thoughts on this conversation. Leave a comment below. But in the meantime, keep it trendy. Updates hapa SPM birds.


What's good Josh boros back again with another video. So we finally had time to digest Uh, Cody Rhodes winning the royal rumble back to back years, but I actually wanted to Have this conversation with some of y'all man because I've been seeing a lot of interesting things On social media regarding to Cody Rhodes winning back to back royal rumbles. I'm seeing a lot of people all of a sudden saying Oh, this was predictable. We knew Cody was going to win when in actuality I didn't see really too many people on social media talking about Cody winning the royal rumble In fact, I saw a lot more people saying seam punk was going to win the royal rumble Or goonther was going to win the royal rumble And I was one of those people that initially thought seam punk was going to win it And then Cody was going to have to find his way to get into the elimination chamber to win that or The teases they were having with goonther coming out to confront Seth Rollins I was thinking maybe they pull the swerve and give it to goonther because if anyone else deserves Winning a royal rumble it would be goonther, but Surprisingly, um, I didn't see cody winning back to back. That was the that was the one option I I really wasn't expecting granted initially Um, once seam punk came back. I was like, yeah, I don't see them giving cody the back to back wins But I was surprised so it's very interesting to see A lot of people on social media saying oh, I knew cody was going to win I knew for a fact and maybe some of y'all did but I don't remember seeing a lot of y'all having that conversation I saw a lot of people talking about cody going to the elimination chamber and winning there To have the opportunity to face roman so Hell there was some people saying the rock was gonna win Which I I figured that wasn't going to need to happen because the rock doesn't need to be in there to uh To face roman reigns that can happen on its own without him being in a royal rumble So it's very interesting now that cody has won so many people are saying that This was predictable. We knew this was gonna happen. I don't think y'all did I don't I feel like there's a lot of people that wanted seam punk to win And they felt some type of way that cody got got the win here But in my opinion, I don't have a problem with it because it it assures us that we're not gonna get roman versus Uh, the rock it assures us that cody will be main eventing night night two I do think the rock will be involved in some capacity since he's been Mentioned and he brought up roman roman reigns indirectly, you know, so I do feel like that's gonna happen I think he's gonna be the catalyst to help cody overcome the bloodline and it'll be a uh, Interesting way to start off the roman rock view, which I do think they'll extend all the way to wrestle mania 41 But it's just very weird. All of a sudden now people a lot of people I've seen on on social media Are really not liking this and granted granted It's fine. You you're getting tired to your opinions. I just remember a lot of people When cody initially lost last year There was a lot of people that were disappointed a lot of people that were like, you know Kind of over cody's story and you know, they felt like damn it should have happened then And there was there was a lot of people that maybe had a little bit hope that maybe they could stretch this out And maybe we can get the rematch. I don't know but it's very interesting to see now All this dissension of nah, we knew cody was gonna win. No, nobody was talking about that In fact, I asked people in our chat Uh last night for the live stream. Who did y'all think was gonna win? There was a small select few that said cody, but mostly everyone was saying seam punk agunter A couple different names here and there, but it was rarely cody and I'm okay with this because like I said before This assures us that the rock in roman's not happening at this year's WrestleMania Which I was one of the people that didn't want that to happen Now I've seen a lot of people saying oh wow, the rock's gonna take cody spot That's what I was seeing when the rock had announced You don't want to sit at the head of the table I saw a lot of people on social media say oh now the rocks gonna take cody spot Now cody wins And then it's like oh We knew this was gonna happen all along. No No, it's it's a it's a lot of fickleness and we've we've seen it all the time in Especially with wwe fans and wrestling fans in general the fickleness the same people that are sitting up there Complaining that cody won again are the same people that wanted him to finish his story Or the same people that wanted him to be an elimination chamber I've even seen a lot of comparisons from when shon michaels was in the royal rumble And he wanted to get back to wrestling the undertaker and he lost in that royal rumble And he just became obsessed with trying to face the undertaker to beat him He he even superkick uh, superkick. Uh, what was his name the general manager of smackdown Teddy long he super kicked him in the face because he wanted to be an elimination chamber to face The undertaker and it didn't happen. So he had to take matters into his own hands People were comparing that story to what cody's gonna go through. He's gonna lose. He's gonna go down his manic road He's gonna find a way To get into the elimination chamber to finish the story I've seen people talk about that and I thought that was a good good little story idea But they decided to go somewhere different and I think people May not realize during the match At the end cm punk blatantly said Where the cameras can hear Hey, I'm didn't wait 10 years to lose to dusty's kid That was such a heel-like remark because he felt like he knew he had it in the bag And if you listen back to the reaction, there were a lot of people that were booing not a lot But you can hear the booze. This is the first time we really heard some booze from cm punk And then cody wins And once again, I'm gonna put this in perspective A lot of the people that be talking Just craziness on social media. Those aren't the people that's buying tickets to go to wrestlemania. I can tell you this right now When the main event happened at this year's wrestlemania And we get tonight to roman versus cody. I promise you this The crowd is going to go crazy for cody Everyone's talking about all this was predictable all this other stuff I'm telling you this now the crowd is going to go crazy for cody because I think the people that are paying money to go to wrestlemania They want to see cody be crowned the new champ They want to see roman finally get defeated and that's the moment that they're trying to create Simple so the people that are on social media saying this is predictable This is trash all this other stuff You guys are not going to be the ones paying tickets to go watch the show to watch it live to see this happening It's going to be a great moment He's the most over baby face in wwe right now still The question is how they're going to build this up How they're going to incorporate the rock into this because I do believe He is going to have to be an integral part because they can't go the same route they did last year The bloodline is going to have to be neutralized and it's probably bettered for it to be neutralized By the rock himself to set up another few which I think is going to be some great storytelling They did the job for cody. Well, you know they cody did the job for roman last year It's now time for roman to return to favor and do the job for cody simple as that We don't need the roman to hold the title all the way to break hulk hogan's record No, I think it's it's done. The title reign has been stretched to its limit We saw it last night with that fatal four way the match could have been put on smackdown It would have probably got the same type of reaction wasn't entertaining. Yes, but we knew how it was going to finish We knew what was going to happen. It was a fatal four way No rules solo's going to get involved or jimmy's going to get involved. We knew this It was nothing that they've gotten to that point There's nothing else they can tell with roman other than he's beaten everybody with the help of solo jimmy or Insert bloodline member. I think that story is done. The story now Is can cody finally overcome the odds here? That's it So everyone's entitled to their opinion I just find it very weird that so many people saying this is predictable when weeks leading up I didn't hear anybody saying cody was going to win again. All I heard was cm punk and goother And they didn't win so now it's predictable I don't I don't think it is me. I was surprised. I was never a person that thought cody was going to win Hell, I didn't even prefer him to win. I thought it would have been better for him to win at the elimination chamber And give that moment to cm punk, but the end of the day They decided to go this route and I'm okay with it because it for me it solidifies the idea roman And the rock is not happening the way we intended it. They're not going to main event WrestleMania and they're not going to take that spot from somebody else He's going to be involved, but we now know the main event for night two without a doubt cody roman Finally cody finishes the story finally roman gets the throne and we can move on to other feuds into the future So y'all comment down below. Let me know. Am I the only one seeing this all of a sudden on social media now Everybody thought cody was going to win when literally a couple days ago There was barely any people people saying cody was going to win. I just I find it very interesting It's it's it's the wrestling fan base boys can be super fickle when their individual they thought was going to win Doesn't win, you know, that's just my personal opinion on it. Y'all. Let me know if y'all been seeing that as well I appreciate all of the support you guys shown on channel rota 150k and i'm seeing you on speedy youtube wrestling champion world Appreciate y'all kicking in with me. See y'all next one. Peace


Welcome to ToffeeTV, it is the match preview, Everton away to West Ham United at the London Stadium this coming Saturday. Battle for mid-table supremacy in the Premier League. West Ham currently on 42 points, Everton on 40 points. Tell you what, both trying to get over that 43. Target, we all set for ourselves. I just feel like if we can get over 43 points or 43 points at this stage, it's all looking good. Good for what? I'm trying to build it up, effectively the race for 7th is still on for both of course it is. If there's a race, it's more like a slow walk. West Ham are 2 points behind Wolves and 7th having a 4 point behind Wolves in 11th. That's an opportunity in itself to keep the pressure on them. Wolves and Woff are both in the FA Cup so their minds might be slightly distracted. This is an opportunity for both teams, I think it's a winnable game for both teams at the weekend so it's going to be a tough game. We've not been great at the London Stadium have we, we only played there. Got me there last season, 3-0, 0 season before them. So their game that we played there, we haven't won yet and we hope them to show. We win at the weekend, it's one of each since they moved there. West Ham on a decent run of form at home, they really won the last three games at home. First time they've done that since they've been there. Obviously the last time out, fantastic comeback against Huddersfield, 3-1 there and ended up winning the game 4-3. Something that I've thought or seen about West Ham is that they've got goals in them haven't they? I mean you can see goals but they've got goals in them and obviously that always gives you the chance. Of course I mean, Hananda's who I thought was a good sign and West Ham got, thought he'd scored a lot of goals for them and he hasn't done as well as I thought he would but he's got goals for them and you know he got the importance. He didn't last time out against Huddersfield equaliser and a winner so he's someone you've always got to watch. You've got to look out for an out of it, scored in midweek for the, you know, for Austria so. You know they've got danger as players, I mean Phillie Manderson's been fantastic all season, he's another real threat. I don't think they've grated the back as Huddersfield displayed last time out. So that's obviously what you're looking at but then again they'll be saying the same thing about everyone. You know, that my danger's just going forward but you can get at them and obviously Everton, you know, we're going to be missing. Yerry Meane it looks like we'll be missing Luka Deane as well for this game so you know we'll have to bring. Kateryum will come back in which is fine, he's played most of the games anyway and then Leighton Baines. But I think in terms of Everton with Baines it's obviously a massive blow to lose Luka Deane, he's been fantastic this season for us. Didn't have a great game again, in fact probably the worst game he had this season was West Ham, you know. But I think with Baines coming in, I think this game suits Baines because Everton, the attacking owners will be on West Ham. So I think he can play a more reserved game Baines and we know that he's comfortable on the board and he's been hard in front of them who's a fantastic little player. So I think Everton might be covered this weekend, I don't think they'll feel the full effects of Luka Deane being out because Baines is a natural fit to come in there. Yeah I mean, who's to say Yerry Meane would have started anyway with Kateryum being available for this game? I do feel that, I do feel that Meane offensively anyway on set pieces is so much more of a threat and opens the door for other players. And I think that'll be a miss certainly away from home when you really, you know, a set piece goal can change your game massively. Deane as you've already mentioned, I don't know, I'd like to have seen those two together because I think there's such a good threat. I know what you're saying, you look at Newcastle and look how well they played in that game and how they add the way they move off each other. I don't know whether, I mean, Baines can still play that role because actually he doesn't have to be lightning and he's intelligent enough. It's whether he can get back on the other side, get back defensively, that's a worry, but it depends how we go into the game. I mean, Seamus Coleman played for Ireland against Georgia and I believe he played very, very well and coming off the back of the performance against Chelsea. So that's a big boost, hasn't it? A big boost that will have that side and Rich Arleson, I think, started on the right for Brazil as well. So he played a couple of games so that's another threat. It's just, you know, it's where he continues with Dom, which I imagine he would, although Trentos has scored a couple of international goals. Yeah, but that's what I'm saying. I think for me, the whole thing with the Baines thing is, we're kind of like talking like as if Baines has come up. And Baines has been an amazing left-back for us and still has offered, he's still a good footballer. So I've got no worries about him at the weekend, I think he's a good player. I think he still adds that quality with his left foot. I don't think there's too much of a drop-off with Dean in terms of the quality with the left foot. I think the only thing is, like you say, Luka's obviously able to do to get up and down the relentlessness. But if Baines has reserved him, worry about it. I think having Bernard in front of you helps because you give it an ill-kill. If Foyre works hard, he keeps it, he buys you some time and Baines can then get up and join him. I think you're right with Coleman and Rich Arleson having good breaks for their international teams. Coming off the back of Chelsea, the goal certainly against Chelsea will have helped Rich Arleson and then he's played there for Brazil on the right-hand side. So I think it's okay, I think we go into this one. We've got to go after them. If we sit back and let Westlam come on to us, that's where they'll be dangerous because obviously like we said before, there are people like Andy Carroll who's not great but he's a handful. He'll be, you know, he can exploit that weakness certainly on set pieces. Of course he can, you know. Declan Rice's teams are doing well for them obviously. They're doing well for England as well. Yeah, he's doing alright for England. I wouldn't say they've got a balance but they've got dangerous players. I mean compared to what they were last season, I think I read the other day they were 25 or 30% better than they were last season. So this season has been an improvement for them and you know they seem to be settling into that home ground which obviously for them is a big push point but you know they are where they are and there's no reason why we can't go there and threaten them and the fact that they're at home and that could help, you know, that's certainly I think could help us playing in the counter-attack. It's just more how we deal with it and you know coming off the back of the last away game, the Newcastle game I thought we controlled that game for 60 minutes and then we felt a bit. I'm just wondering now whether because we've got the 40 points and maybe that worry is all gone that players can just relax now and play a bit more football because we've seen, you know, a Cardiff once we've got the goal and at Newcastle for an hour being 2-0 up, you know, we played some lovely football once we were relaxed and it's when, you know, it didn't happen at Cardiff but it happened to me before we'd scored. We played, you know, calm and relaxed in the help of football. Newcastle till they scored their goal, we were playing some nice football. It's just about managing the game and hopefully again from the Chelsea game being 2-0 up and just going, you know what, just not kill the game but the manager made the right subs and players made the right decisions and we just, we got through it and I just hope there's a bit of that on Saturday because this team going towards the end of the season now to the end of the season has got to learn how to be itself. It's got to and it's also got to learn in adversity, i.e. when you can see the goal how to cope properly. You know, it's great, we're fully switched on at 0-0 or at 1-0 or 2-0, but you know, when it's 0 we defend properly against Liverpool, we were, we were at it for the whole 90 minutes defending, you know, yes the keepers had to make up for a good save but we were at it, Chelsea at home, we were concentrating and throwing ourselves in the way and we were doing that at Newcastle until we conceded and it was like once that goal went in, everything went out the door we've seen that a few times with everything, it's like you still keep doing the things you were doing at 0 even if you concede 1, just if it's 1, make sure there's no more defend properly and it's about managing the game and that's one criticism I would level at the manager or certainly at the players is that you need to learn to stay, keep with the game plan even if you concede a goal because, you know, if we'd have done that at Newcastle and done it properly we'd have still won the game and that's the thing is that you're not going to win every game to nil, it's not going to happen so you have to be able to think well if they score we'll get 2 if they get 2 we'll get 3 but we'll defend properly you've got to work yourself back into game 2 you know, whether you're leading, whether you're getting beat, whatever if there's a period of pressure, you can't just all crumble you've got to go, you've got to go right now we have a back to the wall situation and then we play out of that it can't just be, ah, you know, like it certainly wasn't Newcastle just set everything on fire that you've done well you know, if the opposition, if you're winning 2 nil like we were there in the opposition score you hope the manager will respond by making you know, if he makes a sub, it's a sub that is helpful helpful not what that problem is but the players also have to take these possibilities no, no, no, we're going to move on to the players but the players are the real ones that are on the pitch they have to, have to say hang on, we're alright here, we're doing alright if we can, I think the biggest problem for everything is you know, I see your time says does anybody, when we're under the course or when we're, or even when things are going right for us and that's when it's most important does anyone on the pitch understand what the threat is you know what I mean, and say, lads you know what's happening, so-and-so is getting the ball and he's beating all of us, so why, like if we start doubling up on him, or someone go over to the manager and just say, listen, he's a threat and he can't deal with it, so can we make a change that eliminates him because you know what, Premier League teams have a couple of good players in them most of them, everyone below the top six and everyone else is a much of a muchness and a lot of the teams, if you can stop that one player then you can stop the team and it's about our players at times just going he's the problem, can someone switch on start dealing with that thing but we don't, we all tend to just go and that's why I think we do at times and we've seen it early on in the season we've seen it in different parts of the season with the set pieces conceding goals but everyone's just doing their own thing and it leads to no one talking no one communicating and I know we spoke about leadership all the time but this is just going, this is establishing going that's the problem right there let's start dealing with that if you even have to boot someone on the halfway line if it stops the game, if it breaks up what could suddenly happen or if we have the ball on the halfway line and we're losing it cheaply someone's got to be, hey, you can't be doing that you can't be doing that would you play Gomez and Garner still or would you bring Snadlam back in? No, I play Gomez and Garner because I think as a three sorry, those two with Sigurdson I don't think there's a, I don't I don't think there's a, I think we've got the 40 points do we really want to go to West Ham thinking, right, we need to be negative I think we go there positive because we just won the last game and say, well Gomez is as good as any of your fielders so why not play him Snidland's there for for that X or something but I don't think you need to go in to get I mean look Snidland's there for the last 20 when Gomez fizzles out when there's 10 games left are we really going to approach any of them in that spirit now Gomez isn't like a if anyone, if I was I mean I wouldn't but if I was going to leave anyone out I'd probably leave Sigurdson out I mean I wouldn't but you know what I mean he's the most luxury out of three isn't he exactly, but he's still but he's still so important to the way we play can't lose 13 goals from our team no I know you're right I'm just saying you couldn't do that even though there'll be times and I've done it where you go what is he providing he's not even in the game but he's got the thing is he can come up with something a goal from nowhere or he's in the right place Sigurdson is the kind of player that you don't always appreciate by watching the game from the stands if that makes sense sometimes you need to watch the game for a couple of years because you could almost watch the game like it was like a pro zone thing like it's not it's not an ideal way to watch football if you want to be part of it but from a tactical point of view it's fantastic and I think Sigurdson is one of those players that if you just watch him and watch where he actually brings we know because we've seen the stats because when you know when you look at people's assists and things like that and you go it's like some kind of P&R P&R is the classic case and you've got three assists this season and it's like well hang on how many opportunities do you create that people missed or how much did he link it all together I think because I do the stats after the games and stuff is that sometimes he has 11 touches in the game and that's shocking listen I watched him for France against Franco the night he's done well but he'll pop up with a goal and in our team that doesn't score tons of goals this is the top score of it so we have to play anyway so it's irrelevant but I know what you're saying if the one was going to miss out for a more defensive style then maybe it would be him but obviously quite clearly he's going to play you just mentioned Dominic Alderlun there he scored again for the 21s he was sub and this week the friendly against Germany came on but he's doing really well isn't he he's a player who's growing into into that role I'm not sure if he's still at the level we would need him to be in terms of chasing trying to finish higher up but he's going on the right path isn't he for me what Dom is doing is at the moment is what people have asked him to do he doesn't do it every week he doesn't do it in all the games but I think what we're starting to see is is encouraging signs because he's playing more games he's starting to understand the position we spoke to GameSharp Andy Gale last week GameSharp was absolutely right what he said he doesn't have enough what's the word aggression in this game and he's absolutely right he doesn't always go and chase lost causes for the sake of just making making life difficult or knocking it out for a throw or whatever or coming off him he doesn't do that enough he doesn't think he fully appreciates and it's not that he's lazy just it's hard when you're playing up front he's got to learn the nuances of playing up front on your own because he's never going to be I don't think he's ever going to be in the season's like that ever because I just don't see the instinct that you would see with like a lakaku but you can work at the other part that can get you goals and then that's what we're starting to see I just don't see enough tapping from him so that's what I would be saying to him about if you were coaching him you'd be saying get yourself in and around the penalty spot as often as you can because you'll get opportunities it's chicken and egg isn't it or some any evident striker would probably say there's not enough opportunities so I don't make that run because I'm never expecting it and then the wingers or whoever will say if you were there I'd give you the ball it is something we've got to make those runs because primarily he's there to put the ball in the net but it's difficult isn't it when you're playing up front on your own because primarily actually you're not there to put the ball in the net as weirdly as that is for the for the Sigurdsons and for the Rechalesons that's where we've gone as teams now we don't naturally play with a proper split striker and then that's the problem Sigurdsons doesn't get really close to it but when he does like we've seen last week in the Chelsea game it's really beneficial and when he did it Sigurdsons did it against Bournemouth it was really beneficial when he got closer in the second half so maybe the whole team too just push up a little bit more and trust each other a little bit more Dom's got a long way to go let's not kid ourselves but he's going in the right direction that's all you can ask for him and I think in the summer we've got to be looking pacing and I think I don't really care what anyone anyone else even the highest of the high people think we need another striker well we do we need two and I'd be annoyed if we didn't go out and get somebody to help him out I mean the idea when we've mentioned it before is something like Sigurdsons obviously he's coming at the end of his contact Chelsea don't know if he's going to sign another one listen I know how hard it would be to sign him I know there'll be a lot of people trying to get him he's just become the third highest goalscorer in French football he's the kind of player I know West Ham have been linked with Jekyll 33 he'd be another one you'd be looking at I mean don't get me wrong he'd be on big money and I don't imagine everyone would go from because he is 33 maybe he was 30 but he's like the kind of player that you'd go imagine what Dom had laying because who's Dom laying enough I know you've got Duncan Ferguson there he's coach but who's he actually laying enough that every day again I would refer back to what Andy Gray said and Graeme Sharp Andy Gray when I come in I just went over and had a chance and you know do this do that he could do things I couldn't do I could do things he couldn't do and it worked and we little things you know do this do that that's all really beneficial and I don't know if Dom's got that from anyone at the club because if you're Shingt Olson you can't exactly be going over to Dom on the Carvement Loom and he's playing ahead of you you can't because you don't want to I mean he isn't established he's far from established in the Premier League and who else have we got we've got nobody else so Dom's not laying enough anybody on the pitch and that's a big problem okay LaCarque was at the club but are they the same kind of striker no they're not but then again you might necessarily buy the same type of striker we've been linked with a young French striker this week who's all about the variation movement so we brought him in a different profile but is it worrying that Dom on the Carvement Loom is our most experienced Premier League striker you say that out loud that already tells you the problems Dom's facing as a centre forward that's why I'm saying I've got two I'll be getting two in the summer I'll get three because I think I know we scored a couple of goals this week for Shingt Olson and he's obviously it's the can he get in those areas enough given the pace of this game I don't know whether he does or not you do know he doesn't but I think if he given chances he would score goals but we don't make the kind of chances that he needs because we play one off front so therefore then potentially we'll be shipping him out in the summer cargo we'll be shipping him back to take a sugar matting in the summer so therefore you need another striker just to cover him because Niash went out on loan to Cardiff so you'd be looking and going one maybe two coming in to help Dom and then you've got to choose your three that's fair the complication Shingt Olson isn't going to leave unless someone's coming in someone will come in for them if someone's coming into the club you're not selling Shingt Olson but I think we'll get one maybe two but I think the thing with that then is it'd be great if that was the situation if you've got a different profile so if you've got what you're doing you've got this young French kid who's pacey and can get about the pit because that gives you options also there's the Hemmy on your curie thing you can play through the middle you can play out wide so you're trying to strengthen a squad that's it but it's all of that will help Dom even the competition will help Dom so we have to battle together and their profile might be slightly different but that's how we get the best Shingt Olson what Dom needs is the run of games of course it's a shame really that he wasn't it's a shame he wasn't in the England squad we should have been at the end of the day probably should have been striker wise England are alright I think it'd be nice if Southgate looked at him you know why I call him up because even just being with the England squad for a few days and being around some like Harry Kane and just seeing what he does and just elevating himself and being like Dom the Captain being the full England squad that I think it would elevate Dom to maybe just go up a little bit because at times I think that aggression comes from not being cocky enough because I do think he's a very genuine lad and I think aggression at times just comes from being that little bit not overly confident confidence in yourself just a little bit cocky not pick for cocky but you can see why pick for it is a little bit like that because confidence wise it probably just keeps you up there ready to go and I think that's what Dom just needs a little bit but it's how do you get that because he's probably very humble kid he's like well I've done not in the game and that's great because sometimes he goes too far and these junks think they've done loads but I just think he needs that it's not self-belief by any means because I think he's got self-belief I think he knows he's a good player it's just that I belong where he probably still feels he's got a lot to prove which he has, of course he has but you know what I mean just that I am confident boost and it's you know and the reason why I would say he probably should have been called up is because he's done it regularly for England squads 21 score the win in the welch of final for the 20's show Dom needs for me if he's not scoring he just needs to make sure that he's getting assist if he's not getting assist he's doing something like against Chelsea against Chelsea he made it hard for the sense of he was in the face he was jumping into them he was closing down he was sliding he didn't really do that against Liverpool I think van Dijk started off dominating them and he ended up trying to play on Robertson which is fine but I I slightly disagree I thought he had a good game against Liverpool because I think what he did was intelligent I think he gave van Dijk a very comfortable afternoon but that's because he left them didn't help us but that's not his fault if you're playing one off front what are you supposed to do if you're the striker and you end up on the wing and next stand the next of your winger what he did was very deliberate what he did was you're just talking about off angled passes to try and win it against Robertson but that's what he did what he didn't do what he did do against Chelsea which was he made it difficult for Dijk to but I think in that game he was told to be out wide it was clear that he was told to be out wide for those angled passes and it was I'm talking about angled passes I'm talking about making it difficult but he hasn't got that's what I'm saying he was told to play on Robertson and I think he did that deliberately and I think that's where intelligent wise that game van Dijk was head and shoulders better than anyone on the pitch of course he was he made the decision that it was better to play off that side and maybe allowed the space for plays to come forward didn't necessarily work but if he's been instructed to do that and he's made that decision to do that then what can you do the lads made the decision I don't think he had a poor game he just chose where as maybe the Chelsea players he thought well I can get in their faces but no I don't think it's confidence I think it's times you've just got to know so is it belief if you know because if you're a centre forward you then goes on the wing and there's no one replacing you then you put in your team the point is that it's deliberate van Dijk was winning everything so why do you persist doing something so you just let van Dijk keep on winning the ball who's winning it anyway he was literally winning it anyway so what was he doing when van Dijk was winning it anyway he was gone wide so he was jumping with van Dijk but why did he bit him in the balls of van Dijk what did he wear anyway so you know Dom had gone on to a matter he'd have been there wouldn't he well exactly and he wasn't winning them and then he was pulling he won a few against Rebs oh he won loads against them and what did we get from him well that's not his fault is he well the tactic was wrong then it was silver then isn't it well did silver say that he had to do that do you know that well if that's the tactic then that'll come from the manager everything comes from the manager I'm not talking about the aerial balls I'm talking about making it difficult for the two centre backs which he didn't do against Liverpool but that's difficult though and he's made the decision it's not difficult it's not difficult to make the centre backs know that they're in the game of football the ball is not going up there is he so Dom was just running aimless passes to him or it was out wide it wasn't from where I was sat on the half way line that wasn't what happened it might have looked different in this season it didn't happen if they got won any pass for me it's pointless trying to go up against somebody that has got the beaten of you every time you've got to change and I thought in that game Dom tried to change that's fine I disagree it didn't work because at the end of the day he won against all the others and no one else joined in because that's the way we played we played a lot more reserved but against Chelsea in second half we pushed up and when you've got men around Dom I think that helps him because he's not at that level yet I'm not saying if he went up against Van Dijk he'd beat him but when they had the ball on the floor he didn't make it difficult for them and he did against Chelsea it's no one now isn't it it's having that aggression that's what we just spoke about it's about having that aggression I thought against Liverpool he tried to play on the full back at times because he knew he could do him in the air it was clear that it was a tactic because every time Pickford got the ball he just aimed it over there again just to go back to my point I'm not talking about when Pickford was launching balls I'm talking about this general play in this general play he didn't make it difficult which is exactly what Graeme Sharp said but that's the only time we got the ball forward though was when Pickford was diagonally when we were playing it long it's Pickford all the time because every time he had to give the defenders the ball they just gave it back to Pickford and he just does the same thing anyway so I just thought he was feeding off scraps and came off Van Dijk because he knew it was pointless or if he thought Van Dijk was going to win it he was jumping into Van Dijk so I just thought he was feeding off scraps into the basket and I thought Chelsea second half when we started laying into getting higher up the pitch it suited him because he needs players around him I don't know why we played one off from but we will continue to we've played it for years it's mad because it's mad Martin has carried it on it's not like unless it's written in stone somewhere we can only play once like it isn't it he did it because he had Kale didn't he yeah he had there was a reason wasn't he but then maybe the man of the things will shake it in and I know but he's got to be tighter and when he does go tighter he gets goals or way better let's have a look at some of the stats ahead of the game West Ham have won their last two games against Everton in the Premier League one more than they've managed in the previous 19 against Everton I'm not reading that one it's the 63rd season in which West Ham and Everton have faced each other in league competition and the Hammers are looking to complete only their fourth ever double over the Toffees West Ham unbeaten in their last six home games they're winning three and drawing three well West Ham haven't lost any of their last 17 Premier League games in which they've scored at least once since the three of us are Arsenal Everton are winless in their last 10 Premier League games played in London since we beat Palace 1-0 when Colman scored it's outrageous, three draws, seven defeats West Ham manage Manwell Pellegrini has faced Newcastle eight times next Everton the most off without losing he's drawn one five and drawn two it does Everton manage Michael Silver is winless nine matches in London and West Ham striker Javier Fernandez have scored all of his 52 goals in the Premier League from inside the penalty area only Tim Kale has scored he's got 56 and scored more in the competition history incredible so basically Fernandez is what we know a penalty box striker like you said before they've got real attack and threat Everton have got attack and threat so you would put if you were a better man or you were trying to make a prediction if you put money on the being goals I don't think neither defence is brilliant so it might be who defends the best of the weekend for the worst but all that being said this is a game that you will look at and go this is winnable, the tough winnable game for Everton hopefully whether Everton go out and do it is another thing I think both teams are very similar you're not sure what you're going to get from either of them box of chocolates not like any box of chocolates I've ever had because you always have the thing in them have you ever had a box of chocolates that you didn't know Bob Demwon's attack you brought in that attack you were nice but you didn't know what they were what if you've got like a nut allergy so you can't can you that's literally that could kill you any of those people are dappled if they had a nut allergy what did he know what chocolate was he getting box of chocolates he's handing them out what if he had nuts in them did he just lose the thing he said I don't know clearly there's no nut allergies in the southern states of America in those days there you go so it's a man made thing belief I don't know I didn't like the film there you go let's just go to the London stadium get the win get back on the bus with the three points box of chocolates silver will be made leave a thought in the comments on the game or box of chocolates without any instructions we'll see you later box of chocolates without any instructions there's no instructions surely there's flavours


in a move that the government has variously defended and described as a welcome departure from colonial-era jurisprudence, as a move against gender stereotypes in India's legal processes, and as a shift away from trunitive law to a deterrence-based system. India now has a new code of criminal procedure, a new evidence act, and a new Indian penal code. These laws are now known as the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Samhita, the Bharatiya Saksha Samhita, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita. They will come into operation the moment these laws are notified by the government, followed by the president's assent granted on 25th December. The biggest questions now are how, if at all, do these new laws and regulations affect ordinary people? Should citizens listen to some of the very earnest sounding criticisms of these laws which have come lately from very serious and reputed legal thinkers and practitioners? For example, that the police have been given very wide powers which will hurt citizens' right to liberty, that the nature of criminal cases, the jurisprudence around them will change in character to make the state more repressive. Today, we have with us joining us over Zoom Sanjay Higde, a senior advocate at the Supreme Court of India who has had an illustrious career in the law for over three decades. They're going to pose some of these important questions and concerns to him. Thank you very much for joining us. It's a very important day. Yesterday, we found that we have a new IPC, a new CRPC, a new Indian Evidence Act. Of course, the names are now in Hindi. But let's begin with one of the very important claims the government is making. These laws are breaking the colonial shackles. Is that really true? Is that what you would say about these three new procedural and substantive laws? I wonder what breaking the colonial shackles means because ultimately, most of these three laws are replications of what already existed. About between 80% and 90% of these laws are still the same word for word. You have broken the colonial shackles by repackaging them or by using Bharatiya Samhita so and so, et cetera, et cetera. Well, you're entitled to that opinion. But at the end of the day, it is not as if you dwelled into new jurisprudential concepts or took them out of some ancient Upanishad or the other and then built upon that. Laws are often a product of societies.  And then they've been put into shape. And as far as India was concerned, we had the poet, among other things, Thomas Bebbington Macaulay who wrote the IPC, the Indian Penal Code, and you had Fitz Ravens who did the Criminal Procedure Code. Now, that has set in a system. You have not really made systemic changes. What you've made is that you've made some changes and you've put in a new cover. Is that breaking the colonial shackles? Well, if you want, you're entitled to think so. But let me give you one more example before we go off this subject. The colonial period also gave us the real ways. Now, assume you decided that that was a colonial relic and we shall have a new Bharatiya gauge measurement. So you would have to necessarily then rip apart the tracks, change the signaling systems, change the bokees, the coaches, everything. What would you have achieved? Nothing much. I mean, trains ultimately still have to go by the laws of physics, right? Absolutely. So what does this exercise bring for the country? Except a lot of aggravation, a lot of uncertainty. Now, can you imagine that in all the police stations all over India, the person who writes the FIRs has learned the new laws. He wants to write 302. What does he write now? Does he go, does he sit with the law books or does he do his normal work? Absolutely, when you rejig the sections and you rename the sections, then it creates a lot of chaos, I can imagine. But then one thing the police stations across the country will probably learn very quickly is that they can have custody instead of 15 days. It goes up substantially now. So is that, I'm not going to say whether it's breaking any shackles, but was this necessary? Was the police struggling when it had just 15 days custody? Most crimes are simple, right? It's a robbery, it's a killing, it's something or the other. And the police have gone about investigating or not investigating them and have filed charges over a period of over 100 and 150 years. So when people asked for bail, the magistrate would first wait normally that let the time for police custody run out. Thereafter, I'll consider your bail. Now, if the police can take you in installments up to a period of 90 days, that initial period itself gets stretched out. So effectively, when a policeman decides that he is going to arrest you, he is saying, please say bye-bye to the world for the next, what is it, six months a year? Three months. Or whatever period I deem fit to keep taking your custody and keep returning you back to judicial custody and whatnot. So what is the essence of a police state? It is giving the policeman too much power over the liberties of the individual. And liberties once lost are not easily regained. So one of the things that the government has again said that, well, look, we are not becoming a punitive state, we are becoming a deterrent state. So that's a very interesting claim because actually the penalties are going up for quite a range of offenses. So is the higher punishment which is written in the statute books going to be a deterrent? Is that the argument? And does jurisprudence work like that? Does a law work like that? See, do you think that a person who is possibly likely to commit a crime is going to be deterred by the quantum of punishment that he's likely to get? No, at that point of time, he's doing a crime because of his particular mindset or his particular circumstances. Okay. And he thinks he's not going to get caught? Absolutely. The deterrent theory of punishment has not been proven to have worked anywhere. Punishment is there as your debt to society, if you have gone wrong. And also, so that there is a sense of justice which is visited upon the victim, which the victim gets that so and so the bad man has been put away. Now that goes, the deprivation of life at liberty under the constitution has to be by a procedure that is fair, just, and reasonable. That's what the Supreme Court held in Menka Gandhi. The question is now that the procedures that you've bought in are they fair, just, and reasonable? Can you sort of put people away under sections which are so vaguely worded? For instance, there's this very interesting section called section 69.  Whoever by deceitful means or by making promise to marry to a woman without any intention of fulfilling the same and has sexual intercourse with her, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offense of rape shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years and shall also be liable to find explanation. Deceitful means shall mean the false promise of employment or promotion, inducement or marriage after suppressing identity. Now, look at the number of value judgments out here. When a policeman has to record an FIR, was there deceitful means right in the beginning and what is deceitful means? After suppression of identity. Now, supposing, now look how wide these terms are. Of course, the intention we all know. People of one religion should not be following another, people of another religion is what will be inarticulate. Not just women, you know. People of one religion should not be following. Women of another religion, of course. Since we don't have gay marriage in this country, fine. Women, now the patriarch, he is writ large here. Then after suppressing identity, what does identity mean? How rich am I? What are my educational qualifications, my caste? Yes, your caste, exactly. So this is a key where when parents do not like what a young in girls choices are, they can very well get a complaint filed under this.  So we are criminalizing. We are criminalizing all kinds of things which should not have been criminal in the first place. You know, the Supreme Court sometimes lamented that before you make laws, do you ever go into what is called a litigation impact assessment? Will the law lead to more litigation or less litigation? The normal sort of civil wrong of not paying your debts was criminalized when you had these check-bouncing cases. Right. Check-bouncing was made a criminal offense. And each word of that section had to be passed several times by several judgements. And if you go to any criminal court, there will be at least three or four courtrooms dedicated only to such offenses. Okay. This is such a huge drag on the system. This is one section, mind you, in the negotiable instrument side. Right. Now when you have a whole court full of vague sections, please imagine the amount of time that it will take to get a judge's undivided attention to the facts of your case. That is going to be the real challenge. And then there is also an interesting part in the new laws, which relates to crimes offenses against marriage. Here, the whole section, actually a lot of attention seems to have been paid to offenses against marriage, what kind of penalty you'll involve. And there is, for example, another section which is illicit sexual relations, but they haven't said what is illicit.  What is illicit? It sounds like a moral judgment rather than a legal terminology. Well, the illicit is whatever the policeman of the day decides before the courts of the day get to decide. That's it.  Now, these same sections could conceivably be also used in cases where people are married or have gone through a marriage ceremony, but the marriage ceremony has not been recognized, has not been registered, has not been legalized in some form or the other. Where the marriage is being led. Even there, there could be. Yes. So, all kinds of everything will then again and again come down to judicial interpretation. It will be first at the trial court stage, possibly will reach the high courts and then the Supreme Court and then you will have a leading judgment. So, what I actually see is plenty of work of statutory interpretation for a whole generation of lawyers and judges. All right, let's move to some other provisions. There was often a demand that some of the laws be defined more specifically like the laws related to terrorism, crimes against the state, et cetera. Do you think the government has done a good job of creating these specific crimes which are, are they clearly defined? Do we know now what is terrorism? Do we know the difference between Rajdhru and Rajdhru? Is it going to be easier for the judges and for the police? Nothing is going to be easier for the judges. Everything is going to be easier for the police. When you put in value judgments, like that word illicit, then it would have to be the initial judgment of the policeman as to whether a crime has occurred or not and then to register in a fire and then process the case, including arrest of the perpetrator and it will be a job of fresh interpretations of the new sections for judges saying, yes, the policeman is right. Yes, no, the policeman is not right. And then the judges will have to be second guest up the appellate system. So that will be the natural result. And as far as the sedition part of it is concerned, I mean, it's not as if this is a new code which is written in Hindi, the operative language is still in English. Right. And what the home minister spoke on the house in Hindi does not necessarily impact the interpretation of those sections as they are laid out in black and white in English. And so while the word sedition may have disappeared, the concept remains. And it is as vague as the previous section. So for instance, who is a terrorist? If he participates in a terrorist act, prepares for a terrorist act, promotes terrorism, organizes or directs others to commit terrorism, contributes to the commission of terrorist acts by a group of persons along with the common purpose of furthering the terrorist act where the contribution is made intentionally and with the aim of furthering the terrorist act or knowledge of the intention of the group to commit a terrorist act or is otherwise involved in terrorism or any organization listed in the first schedule to the UAPA or an organization operating under the same name as an organization so listed. So now somebody comes to a lawyer and says, please appear for a client. This is an allegation and the family is poor, they can't pay, but please, out of your pro bono instinct, please appear.  So there are so many vague kind of sections right now.  Well, I want to ask you, how did this happen? I mean, the opposition was not participating in the debates on this law, but what about the pre-discussion legislative stage? Was, you know, certain amendments were suggested, but they didn't seem to relate to many of these things we're discussing now. No, no, these drafts were out. These drafts were out. They had been criticized. People like me, Professor Mohan Gopal, who was former head of the National Law School of India had written about it. Nevertheless, there was also an assumption that after the bill was introduced and went to a committee, that the committee report would be possibly taken seriously, but then things were rushed through the committee. Descent notes were not, had to be then penned by people like P. Chidambaram, Derrick O'Brien and a few others, but none of that was taken into account. You see, there is a obsession of this regime with the grand gesture. We have to be, we have to do something. This is something. Let us do it. And here too, it was like when GST came in. It was rushed through Parliament so that there was a midnight session and all that. And the operation of it is still not there in place. You ask any set of traders what all they have suffered and also the possibilities of arrests which have been very frequently done. Now, we are going to be in a GST-like situation as far as the criminal law in India is concerned. But they say that only those who have done something wrong need to fear the law. Those who are, those who are not. I'm sorry, everybody is a potential suspect. Whether you have done something or you have not done something, you are entitled to your day in court, but that day in court for a trial is at some distant point in the future. Tomorrow, if your neighbor were to file an FIR against you, say, he did this, that and the other, and you say, no, I did not do it. Who is the first point of interface? It is the policeman. And if a policeman can put you away for more than 90 days because that 90 days, 60 days or 90 days need not be consecutive, then you have given the policeman extreme power. And then we come to the last bit which has drawn some attention, which is the changes to the evidence act. Now, is it that what somebody says to a police officer becomes admissible as evidence? Can you explain for a layperson what that means, how it changes life for the ordinary citizen when such a change comes about? I see the normal law, the previous law was that statements to a police are not evidence, but if you make a statement and subsequent to the statement, there is something like a recovery. Say I, supposing I tell a policeman, well, we got into a fight, there were, and I had a knife on me, I tried to defend myself. The knife went in, then I took the knife and I threw it away in a field. Now, I can show you which field it was. And thereafter, if the policeman went there and found that knife and tellied it with the wounds. So that last part, that look, a knife was found, pursuant to a statement made by him, that could be used as evidence. All right. Now, if the entire contents were to be, were to be available as evidence, that I actually stabbed the person, the contents of the statement were to be used in evidence, then it's a whole new game. So what incentive is there for a policeman to actually investigate a case?  Will there be a challenge? Is the Supreme Court going to be where these laws are discussed? No, every interpretation of the each section might end up in the Supreme Court, but that's going through the normal process and over a period of decades. But the very constitutionality of these sections, I doubt that the Supreme Court will take a kind of bulk challenge. I doubt it when, and for all you know, there will be some overzealous first filers who will come up with not necessarily a well-drawn petition who might just tell, who might just get the court to say, no, no, no, we are not going to look at it at this stage. And therefore, all those challenges, all potential finely crafted challenges to each separate section, might all die in a kind of comprehensive manner. I hope that people do listen to this and consider very carefully as to what challenges that they want to really live in. So, what I'm actually wondering is, is it inevitable now that these laws will come into operation? What are the options for citizens who might be very concerned about what's going on? See, the laws will come into operation the day the government notifies them. But there are some laws where the governments have passed it, presidential assent has been given, but yet the government finally took a look at it and did not decide to notify it. One example was the delirium control amendments. And the Supreme Court said that we can't force the government to bring into force laws or as far as the timing goes. So I would hope that there are people of sense who can tell the government or people with clout who can tell the government, look, this is radical change that you have brought about. People need to be educated. The system needs to absorb it. Policemen have to be retrained. If you have computer programs to record FIRs and sort things out, categorize them, even they need to be upgraded. So all this is going to take time. So now that you've passed the legislation, please leave implementation of the legislation to a future government. If you come into power after the next elections, then you do it. Otherwise, let the new government take a call. So when people vote, if this law is not yet been brought into force, they may yet have a chance of preventing it from being brought into force. If this becomes an electoral issue. If on the other hand, people do exactly what Dr. Ambedkar advised them not to do, which is lay their liberties at the feet of a great man. If you trust that your liberties are safe with a great man and the great Indian police, then there is nothing much that can be done. All right, with that note of what I can only see as a warning, we'll end this discussion. Thank you very much, Mr. Hector.