Going on everyone Sam here with late sports cards. We are ripping 20 23 tops definitive baseball hobby three box case number three pick your team style Redophilus for names and our teams Brian G with the Mets Brian C Mariners David O blue J's DWD backs Edward P athletic Stodgers Evan L Tigers Gabriel C Braves Orioles Gary G Astros Greg M Guardians Marlins twins James J Royals John A angels Joshua B Giants Joshua M pirates Michael Y Red Sox Mitchell S with the brew crew Myro L reds name QL rays Peter M. Yanks Ray G Rangers Raymond R Cubs White Sox Rob L Phillies Ross T Nationals Shigunori you Rockies Steven E with the Cardinals and Zonghan L with the Padres So good luck everybody. Let's do it three to go in Bowman Chrome you that is breaking right after this teams are all marked down Colorado's a hundred dollars off which is awesome. Okay. Here we go All right time for definitive again, let's get it to the top foam and we've got a cow rickett that is going to be 18 of 30 nice one there for the Orioles Very nice going to the White Sox one-of-one Letterman is Paul canerco One-of-one Letterman the O and canerco Nice one there good stuff White Sox. He was super underrated. Yeah, he's like like he's like the heart and soul That oh five championship team Raymond R. Congrats, buddy. We'll have that one for you whoa to Ten Three colored RPA going to the Orioles. Congrats Baltimore. Good Lord. That's not that's a pretty big card Imagine nice one there There you go Baltimore Slaps loaded your rookie is rookie Otto is gonna be Francisco Alvarez 48 of 50 for the Mets We've got to 40 game use that that auto is gonna be Johnny Bench 10 of 40 For the Reds nice one there Reds Congrats since you know the nice one here is gonna be RPA for the Mets. What I sing a Congrats on that Metz you did say it. So did see we needed one Very nice Congrats on that Mets again 11 of 50 on the Senga First Ruby first like true Ruby of the day one-of-one a gold frame auto Man, oh Mike Schmidt whoo whoo God man, dude, what a box this bro. Yeah, this was a box pretty sure this is gonna I'm assuming I don't think I'm gonna random this one. Yeah Yeah, it's between Brian C and John A. We've got 13 of 15 dual auto Ichiro and Shohei Ohtani Wow, oh my god Yeah, like I said, I don't think I'm a random this yeah, I know No, probably not that's wow sick man to see that live to That's the incredible that is that's sick. Yeah, you got this right here, too, and then that Who's a litter man? Can I go really? Love me some definitive though. Yeah, you see what we pulled last night. Yeah, dude. Yeah, dude To Insane man Mike trout that is game used to 40 on the city connect as far as spots John Finnell with Colorado. Thank you, buddy down to just to to to go on the next one Penn State and Notre Dame 14 of 15 is Labor Torres for the Yankees to color patch Congrats Yeah Nice one here yet a good season for himself Austin Riley 8 of 25 for the Braves Austin Riley We've got 48 of 50 that is gonna be a rookie auto of Michael Harris ATL Michael ATL Michael I know I think we pull it in a rookie office in all three cases Yeah, actually We're spamming Michael Harris We've got for the White Sox Carlton Fisk that is 18. No for the Red Sox just getting Red Sox Carlton Fisk I thought that was the One like you know how they used to wear like the throwback jerseys. Oh the red throwback Yeah, sorry about that as Red Sox Yeah, next one's really freaking cool. Yeah, it's going to the Giants that is gonna be a Buster Posey 19 of 25 Yeah, that is that is my that is a j-card Just Notre Dame Available remarks picking up Penn State one group break spot left. I think you remarks and thank you Jonathan as well That's a gold framed auto for the Yanks 8 of 10 CC Sabathia So cool, man. Yeah, there you go. Tony. Tony loves posey. So that'll work 8 of 10 CC Sabathia You got forced really quick when you get a chance after this box I just want to make sure we're good for the Otanian I'm assuming he'll agree, but just grab them when you get a chance and then is that Josh or Brandon Lau Or Josh well That's seven of ten Bobby Whitt and Salvador Perez on the dual green auto to ten Nice one there congrats to the Royals Royals hit seven to ten salve in wit Salve in Thank because it's a Foam and foam that is gonna be to 40 of Hosele to that 38 of 40 Hosele to that Yeah, I like those. Yeah Nice one there Astros. Yeah, these are really nice the protectors at the plate That's gonna be Will Smith. I just won there 24 25 kept game use catchers here. That's sick. That's pretty cool Hello, Skye. What's up Skye? Nice one there will Smith right to at 30 Vladimir Guerrero, Jr 9 of 30 game use Jersey on I Know I was gonna say Rookie Otto to 25 for the Tigers Riley Green 14 of 25 Riley Green you can make this one there congrats to the Tigers on that one We have two gold frames One of ten that is gonna be Barry Larkin came to use Jersey Spencer in here stat Spencer Mr. Spencer Jared golf Jared golf Jared golf. I should just appear We've got nice one here six of ten for the Tigers Miguel Cabrera on the gold frame auto nice one there other areas Look it look at that. Maybe Miguel Cabrera Legend Congrats on that one Detroit where the Tigers in this one by the way Detroit Tigers is gonna be Evan elk. Congrats Evan back-to-back really nice Tigers cards We've got a Byron Busted one of three Nice one there now with the company anymore Tony One of 30 Byron Busted for the Twintons nice one there And then dual autograph rally collection purple parallel man Machado and Juan Soto going to the Padres nice one there Congrats slam Diego zon Hanell welcome to slam Diego Nice one there congrats to the Padres. All right quick recap here everybody. We've got a Mike trout Cal Ripken Jr. and Glaber Taurus We've got autos of Michael Harris Kodai Senga Francisco Alvarez Jose Altuve Carlton Fisk Johnny Bench Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Byron Buxton Buster Posey Austin Riley Barry Larkin wit and Salvi dual and then CC to 10 gold frame We had the dual autograph collection purple of Machado and Soto Oh Sure That one you should probably be able to get into a slider. I would say the Wilson the Wolfspot. Yeah All right, we'll go through it some of the mags so far We've got a one-of-one Paul canerco One out of 30, I think I said out of 10. Whoops my bad For the bucks. Yeah, that's it. Thank you. I'm out of the bucks. Oh the bucks and Oh my bad My bad my bad my bad Paul canerco on the Letterman game used one of one Riley green rookie auto nice one there to 25 Holy them in high school Ten of ten RPA is a Adley roger. Well, he pulled the reverse card now pretty much He said this is my Kyle rich game Every time we go down the field is my Kyle Points to the stars. That's for you One of one is Mike Schmidt on the ruby that is really sick We had the Miguel Cabrera six of ten for the Tigers I'm just gonna show this one again. She's getting into a Protector right now. That is the protectors at the plate of Will Smith to 25 and then this absolutely nasty 13 of 15 dual each year row and show hey Nasty again, we'll get into contact Brian and John with you guys see what you want to do if you want to sell it You want to random it? Whatever this usually we don't do the random, but I feel like with cards like this. Yeah So yeah, I will We'll write down all the order numbers and everything and get that in motion So thank you all again for the fill up next is


Members of the People's Democratic Party, PDP and River State continued their protests in Port Harcourt, the state capital, at the office of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEG, over the inspection of materials used in the last general election. Today's protest was joined by more state assembly members, including the leader of the House, Martin Ameule, alongside the deputy speaker Edison Aheer and chairman of the Query Local Government Area Samuel Wano CK. In addition to the demands for joint inspection of electoral demands and issuance of certified true copies of results sheets, the PDP is demanding the arrest of all Progressive Congress APC Governor, ship-candidate Tonya Cole for alleged murder. We are moving straight to the Coronel Police. We have registered our position yesterday. Today, Arthur Aenec will sleep in the Coronel Police Office. Tonya Cole, who does not enjoy immunity, must be arrested and prosecuted. We sleep in Moscow Road. For now, police must arrest him today because we don't know what to tell the family of the dead PDP supporter. The wife and children are crying at the hospital. Why must we continue out of what our hands and allow creditors who stole our money?


Hi everyone, Joe for Jaspy's casebreaks.com, coming at you with Jaspy's 19 box Hail Mary football mixer. It's a random team break with a Bart Starr autograph giveaway. You see Nick Jaspy getting a head start on the mixer itself so we can save a little bit of time. There he is. Nice autograph. What is this from? Some old early 2000s tops products here. Ring of Honor Bart Starr. Nice on-card autograph. Excellent penmanship right here. So we'll give this away to one person at the end of the break. Alright so let's flip back to this list right here. There's all the boxes in there. There's the Bart Starr. No vet comments will ship. There's the list of boxes right here which you'll all see. I printed it out, checked it. It is correct. Big thanks everyone here. A lot of mixer giveaway spots here so I appreciate everybody giving that a shot too. And all 32 football teams are in. So let's do the break first and then the Bart Starr later along with anything else we need to randomize. Two and a six eight times for each list. And eighth and final time. After eight we've got Laura down to Richard. Two and a six eight times for the teams. Seven and eighth and final time. After eight times we've got Kansas City all the way down to Green Bay. Now this does span a lot of years so just keep that in mind before you trade. Alright. Oh there you go. Kevin saying his two spots are eight and twenty-four. Kobe RIP. Laura you got the Chiefs. David with my Raiders. Adam with the Niners and the Eagles. Ryan with the Cowboys. Chris with the Saints. Alan with the Broncos. Kevin with the Chargers. Matthew with the Jags. Harry Laos with the Lions. That's a last spot mojo star next to your name. A little extra magic there we'd like to think. Kevin M with the Bills. Jared with the Bengals. Mark with the Colts. Adam with the Browns. Jared with the Redskins. JC with the Panthers. Adam with the Jets. Brian with the Giants. Colton with the Texans. Matthew with the Bears. Adam with the Steelers. Anthony with the Seahawks. Ron with the Patriots. Kevin with the Vikings. Anthony with the Falcons. Zach with the Ravens. Scott with the Dolphins. Asa with the Buccaneers. Laura with the Rams. Ron with the Cardinals. Harry Laos with the Titans and Richard Fugit with the Green Bay Packers. Alright so let's sort by Colm B and trade out your own risk ladies and gentlemen. Remember there could be old school guys in here. All the top rookies are in here. Got a lot of different boxes here. Got Chargers up for trade. Oakland's up for trade. Brian's happy. He's got the G-Men hometown team. There you go. Colts up for trade. A Chargers for Colts offer and Oakland for Dallas offer as well. So we'll give it a few moments before we roll. And we've got a basketball mixture coming up a little bit later tonight too ladies and gentlemen. So stand by for that. Sold out. Sold out. I think I need to add another Chronicles hanger. Oh there's another Chronicles hanger. Alright so maybe not sold out. TBD. Let me ponder my decision. Yeah. Well either way stay tuned to jaspyscasebrakes.com. No thanks. He says blah blah blah. Okay so let's just roll. Looks like people are talking trades but... I had a schedule though. Six o'clock pacific at the moment. Could be. Oh I actually got boxes started. So here's some extra boxes here which I'm going to hand over to Nick. He's opening a leap right now. Let's go with our oldest box which is 2012 momentum. And then our second oldest box 2013 prominence. Alright here. Yes. Thanks. Nick Tune. Triple relic and autograph. That is Saints edition. That's going to go to Chris D to $5.99. Here's the official printout by the way. There you go. She knows what we do. There's Jamel Fleming. Oh this is a different lady. To $7.99 we've got Ron Wester and the Cardinals. Roy Aikman. Three color patch for the Cowboys. Ryan. To $49. Rookie salute Bobby Wagner. Seahawks. That'll be for Anthony. It's $99. There's Kendral Reyes for the Chargers. That's going to go to Kevin Benedict. To $7.99. Rookie salute Brian Quick. Relic for the Rams. Laura Turner. Got that spot straight up. $3.75. Rookie team Threads that is. Dual relic for the Jags. To $1.99. That'll be for Matthew Hedges. Larry Fitzgerald. To $99. That's a catch. Alright we've got an extra card there. We've got Team Threads. Triple relic and autograph. Bernie Kosar. That goes to Adam Cupperman and the Cleveland Browns. 5 out of 10 Bernie Kosar. Jersey and Otto. Another old school guy. Randy White. Cowboys. Ryan Peabody. With the boys. That's also the 10-2 out of 10. And a redemption. I think you should be able to do something with you on this expired redemption. Dre Kirkpatrick. From 2012 you sure? 100% Nick says. Alright that goes to Jared Nicoli. 99.9% well now I have to check. I mean is he still with the Bengals? Well from 2012 to 2019 he was with the Bengals. Good old noggin but he was released this March. This past March after eight seasons. Aw this is sad. On November on IR after hyperextending his knee in week six. And then he finished the season starting six games. 33 tackles forward past the defendant in a sack. And then released in March. They were like too old. You're breaking down. New coach. We don't want to pay for you anymore. You're too expensive. Get out. I don't know why I top loaded this.  I'm not going to do that. I don't know why I top loaded this. GD redemption. That goes to Jared and the Bengals. We'll try to do a little recap at the end of this. I also need BRB. I'm going to be awkward here alone. Yeah they're all behind the bar now. Oh we build more up. Me trying to respond to you. Oh no. Was it an important stack? No. It was a lead. Okay. It's fine. It didn't drop. It fell on the other cards. Antonio Brown to 199 and we've got Evance McDonald. Now we're in prominence. Nice Niners logo there to 225. There you go. That goes to Adam Cuperman and the Niners. Ron West was like really Nate? Come on. DJ manuals to 99. It is Bjorn Werner to 204. Pull it out. Does it what? Pull out on the top. What? You never pulled one of those? No. Don't do it all the way. That's it? Yeah. I thought there was something like something was going to be revealed in the back or something like that. That's a half baked idea right there. For the blue horseshoes that goes to Mark and the Colts. Look at that eraser that they put right there. There's Chance Wormack. Well what is it Jason? What is it? Whoa! Alright there's Chance Wormack for Hardy Laos and the Titans and there's Stefan Taylor right there. Your premature super fracking. You got David for Friday. Dominguez? Wow. Are these both elite right here? Yeah. Alright so this is all the different packs in that one elite box. How many would be? Yeah. Save the Dominguez Super Frack their auto for us to pull like week three. There you go. Our first autograph is Vince Beigel. Beigel from Wisconsin. We got a lot of Wisconsin peeps here. Where did he go? This will go to the team that he is currently on. There's no checklist for this right now. I don't remember a checklist. I'm going to make a checklist since we break so much. Vince so for no checklist non-pro uniforms it will go to the team that are currently on. No checklist, college uniforms or non-pro uniform and no team indication. It just says Wisconsin right here. It will go to the team that they are currently on. If they were retired it would go to the team that they played for the longest. For Vince he is currently with the Miami Dolphins. It has been since last season. Wow. That's just been sitting there. Out of Bowman Chrome, Jason Jaspy on Instagram live at Jaspy's Breaks. If you're watching the replay you're probably too late but if you're watching live right here at Jaspy's Breaks on our Instagram go follow us there. He just pulled a Vlad Guerrero Jr. Rookie Superfractor non-auto from Bowman Chrome. It's just been sitting there all this time. It's just marinating in that box. Waiting to get to the right place. You said you don't remember breaking on him. Right. The too many boxes and everything. It looks just like Bowman's best. I think it just probably just melts into my mind like it's Bowman's best. Speaking of Bowman, Bowman Baseball drops on Friday. Be sure to go to our Bowman section on jaspyscasebreaks.com and be sure to read the important details on how many cases we're going to get of that. Some breaks may be pushed back.  We've got Joseph Yearby. Looks like he was signing that in a car. No. Look at it. He is currently a free agent. He has never played for any team. Any NFL team. Did he try out for a team? Let's see if he tried out for a team. He foregoed his senior season entered the 2017 draft. In his pro career Orlando Apollos of the American Alliance football. Was he going to practice squad or can I assign him to a pro team somewhere? Wow. There were articles by Bleacher Report. Joseph Yearby versus Dalvin Cook. Which five star running back is better? There was actually discussion on that. I don't think he was not an undrafted free agent. He goes to second place I guess. Alright. Name on top at the very end will be that. And the second name will be the Joseph Yearby. So we'll set that aside right there. Alright. Moving on. Move along. Move along. Usually we find one or two more autos and stuff like this. Let me slide this over here. And we've got D'Angelo Henderson. D'Angelo Henderson of Coastal Carolina. Think so? Shoot. I know this one. D'Angelo Henderson was... Roughnecks. The Roughnecks, he last... Broncos. He was last with the Eagles. But who do you play for the longest? Because it's not currently active. Go down. You don't have any games or what? No, no games. Broncos? I don't think Broncos. Oh no, he actually did play some pro games with the Broncos. He didn't play any pro games with him. And that's who he would have been in this set. Alright, alright. We'll go with that. Not that everyone's going to be clamoring for the D'Angelo Henderson autograph. We're looking for Mahomes or Watts. The only reason this box exists is to look for Mahomes and McCaffrey and Deshaun Watson. I mean, I don't think I'd be... There's a Mahomes right there. I was going to say, I don't think I've even seen a rookie part of his, but there's our first one.  Graded might cover like a quarter of your spot, if not more. Laura with the Chiefs. First of many, I hope, for Laura. Maybe more. I don't know what the Mahomes prices are. Could gray it out really nicely. People love the Mahomes. And we've got Shock. That's a great name. Shock Linwood. I want to say that is Kleeblom. Shock in the dark. A shock in the dark? No. Undrafted. Played for the Baylor Bears, blah blah blah, Redshirt Freshman. Possible contender for the Heisman in his junior year. Played during the regular season, blah blah blah. Sat out the postseason to focus on possible NFL career, and then nobody wanted him after a senior year.  The cactus bowl? Probably should have played the cactus bowl. Wow, what a random... What happened here? I don't know what happened to him. I think going into the 2015 season, but he has no stats for his junior year. Alright, this is another randomizer. That'll be the third name down on the list. We'll get that extra autograph. No, not yet. We just started this mixer. Maybe some rookies and stars right here. Rookies and stars. Bowman Chrome Football. Bowman Chrome Minis. Let's go here. Rookies and stars. Kind of reminds me of Campbell's Chicken and Stars. To 175, there is Akeem Butler. Dual Relic for Ron and the Cardinals. There's Darius Lennard to 49. There's Kyler Murray. Terry Bradshaw to 25. I'll try to catch as much of those numbered cards as possible. I think this is only like our third or fourth box in, Josh. We've got Justice Hill to 190, you can see above my head. A bunch of boxes left over right there. Kevin Bennett, your wife went to Coastal Carolina, being from Myrtle Beach. How did she like Coastal Carolina? That sounds good, Rex. Chicken and Stars has crushed up Ritz Crackers. I can do that. I've always wanted to visit South Carolina. The coast of South Carolina. Coastal Carolina, even. There's Travis Fulham to 99 for the Lions. Harry Lawis with that. Maybe Savannah, Georgia. Kyler Murray, autograph. Wow. 14 out of 49 out of rookies and stars. Ron Wester. Got randomized to the Cardinals after winning a spot in Optic 13. Gwilyam says go to Charleston. I'll go to Charleston then. I knew this looked a little different. 3 out of 5. David Montgomery. Stellar rookies insert for the Bears. Matthew Hedges. All aboard the Big Head Express. 35. We're heating up a little bit in this mixer here. This is Brian B. This is rookies and stars. Football by Panini. Dual Relic here. Team Duals. Phillip Rivers, Melvin Gordon. Both not on the team anymore. Kevin Benedict with the Bolts. 4 out of 5. Bobby Wagner. Another Bobby Wagner. And another train whistle. Seahawks. I'll go to Anthony. All aboard the Big Head Express. Brian B. You may be lagging me. Tyler. Might be lagging behind a little bit. Not too long, but enough. Make sure you refresh your page or refresh the app on your phone. High Octane. Calvin Ridley. Falcons. Anthony. 225. Gary Jennings Jr. Dress for Success. Jersey and Otto. 62 out of 99. That'll be for the Seahawks. That's going to go to Anthony. There's Brady. 8 out of 10. Pats. Pester. We got Andy Isabella. 33 out of 60. The guy that he hopes to receive a lot of passes from Tyler from. Another one for Ron. And the Redbirds. The Cardinals. There's Big Bend 35. Really anything else. Alright, there you go. Alright, so here's some Bowman Chrome Football from back in 2014. Here's Michael Floyd. There's Aaron Donald Rookie, actually. Derek Carr, also a Rookie. Aaron Donald Refractor will go to Laura and the Rams. And that Derek Carr will go to David and the Raiders. The Blast from the Past here. It's Calvin Pryor. And Dion Buchanan. Cardinals. Hot so far. Ron with the Cardinals. There's On-Card Auto there. And Marquise Lee. 2.99. Jaguars. It's Rookie Mike Evans right there too. Alright, so a couple cool Mike Evanses here for Ace of Luke and the Buccaneers. Got the Die Cut. Bowman's Best. Mike Evans and a Mike Evans Rookie Card. That's certainly a catch right there. And we've got Devante Adams. Paul Sarda 271 for the Packers. That'll be for Richard. Aaron Foster to 2.99. Bucs, Vincent Jackson Refractor. Alright, we've got Topps Chrome Mini. How tiny these are. That much smaller. Ooh, Jimmy G. Rookie Card. Jadavion Clowney. Oh, well our shipping team will pull all of those. Wester will pull that hop too. For Colton. Palomalu, Pulsar for the Steelers. To 102. That Garoppolo should be pretty interesting. And this is a Patriots edition for Ron by the way. And 4 out of 15. Calvin Benjamin. Black Refractor. Carolina JC. And the Carolina Panthers. 4 out of 15.  Right here. I thought it was going to be Autograph. I know my hands look big with these little mini cards. O'Dell Beckham Jr. Rookie. Coleal Mack. Manziel. All sorts of guys here. But nice O'Dell Beckham Jr. Giants Brian Zeller. Rookie O'Dell. Calvin Oyre Refractor. And Martavis Bryant. 20 out of 25. There's your on card on this mini. That's a catch. What a talent. Martavis Bryant. He just needed to put the off-field stuff together but I don't think he quite did that. Steelers Adam Cupperman. And we've got an 81 out of 99. Vontae is perfect. Camo Refractor going to Jared. Let's grab a few more here. Let's grab what's this over here. Well this is that old Panini gridiron gear from 2011. Some good stuff now. It looks like prism draft 2020. 2019. I don't know what year it is. We've got more prism right here. We've got some select right over here. Looks like more current select with Niners Jimmy Garoppolo there. Chris Johnson to 100. Game changers to 100. Yeah that case is still MIA unfortunately. Yeah I believe it's in the item description. We'll be posting updates in there. If you want a refund for that we don't know when we're going to get that so kind of sucks but let us know. JaspysCaseBrakes.gmail.com. I think we ended up just buying another case. Have that shipped to us or picked up or something like that. And then whenever that other case, the original case, whenever that goes out that'll show up. Alright we've got Shane Green. Nice patch in there. 8 out of 10. That'll be for the Patriots. Nice low number on that one. It's kind of young there in 2011. Working more to 100. And we've got Scotty McKnight. Rookie Auto for the Jets. Adam Cupperman remembers Scotty McKnight. 31 out of 2.99. Old Scotty McKnight. What a career. I can't say that I don't know for sure. Zach Paul speculating could be Brian McKnight's brother. There are some indications that may suggest no but what do I know. And we've got Jeremy I do remember Jeremy Curley though. Jeremy Curley. Rookie Autograph for the Jets. Adam Cupperman to 2.90. Randomizer. I think I've got Cam Newton up there though. Ann Vaughan Miller. AJ Green and Marcel Darries. It's not a bad group there. 99 out of 150. That'll be a randomizer at the end of the break. Slide that right over there so I'll remember. Alright here's some Select. It's 2018. Select football. It was Matthew Stafford. Jordan Wilkins to 75. Darius Lennard. Field level. Rookie card. That's to the Colts. Mark with the Colts. Tremaine Edmonds. Vaughan Miller Orange. Matches the color of the team which is always cool. McCaffrey.  Jerry Rice. Hollow. Or Silver in Select. Hollow and Daunress Optic. And Caryon Johnson to 75. Jersey and Autograph. Nice one for the Lions. Harry Laos with that. Todd Curle kind of parallels that. It's kind of cool. Set that aside. Ronald Jones to 2nd. Antonio Callaway Blue to 175. Dalvin Cook. Field level. Silver for the Vikings. Kevin Benedict. Breeze. Calvin Ridley to 149. White Prism. Jersey. Anthony with the Dirty Birds. Antonio Brown Leonard Fournette. Copper. Checkerboard to 75. Sorry. Throwing in Leonard Fournette around. Hayden Hurst. And Dante Hall is your Autograph. Chiefs. That'll be for Laura. Remember Dante Hall. 30 out of 49. Let's get into some of this 2020 Prism draft picks football. This does have a checklist. Which I will pull up right now. Stand by. So we'll look up all the autographs and shipping team will look at the parallels. Make sure they go to the right place. They'll go to the team. That's on that checklist that I dropped into the chat. Alright here we go. Good luck. You got Baker Mayfield. And a Jordan Love. One out of seven. Gold Cracked Ice. Chase Young. Brian Lewerke. Richard with Green Bay. Meikle Hardman. Henning in this Tennessee here. Devo. CJ Henderson. And we've got Kindle Vildor. One out of five. Gold Vinyl Autograph. Wow. And Kindle goes to the Bears. Nice. Bears. Matt Hedges. All aboard the Big Head Express. Woohoo. Got that in a team or an optic break. One that makes your spine. The optic break ends up with a train whistle. Raiders is Brian Edwards. I've got high hopes for him. There's Mahomes in his college gear. And Scotty Phillips. 189 to 199. Ole Miss. Scotty Phillips is a Texan. An undrafted free agent. Signed by Houston. That'll go to Colton in the Texans. Jalen Hurts. Jerry Rice. Daniel Jones. And another two out of seven. Michael Thomas. Nice one for the Saints. Nice. Gold Cracked Ice. Going to Chris Christie with that. Mark Andrews is not numbered. Devon Singletary. Donna from People's Jones. Daryl Henderson. Mar-Jackson Crusade. There's Tua, Rookie Tua card for Miami. Going to be for Scott. Clint Sutton. Smith. Josh Jacobs. Derek Henry. CD Lam. Deandre Swift. And Patrick Louisiana State University. LSU Tiger. Riverboat Queen. Patrick Queen. Ravens. From a tiger from a cat to a bird. Going to Zach Paul. Now we're sharing the same dream. And our hearts will beat as one. No more love. A little one pack. One packers right here. Origins. There's plates and patches. There is Upper Deck Vermeer which could have some exciting stuff in there. There's some XR football. Some Strata football. And what is this? Elements? Elements football. Don't forget the jersey. Right there. That'll be the last thing we do. Alright. Juju Smith Schuster to 249. Marquise Brown to 249. And we've got a 3 out of 5 Jeffrey Simmons autograph. Titans. Harry Laos with that one. There you go man. Out of 5's and under get the train whistle. Thanks Stephen K. All aboard the Big Head Express. Woo-woo. Got a triple relic team Broncos to 99. That's for the Broncos. That'll be for Allen Murdock. Keenan Allen to 10. Team 8 Easton Stick to 99. And Will Greer triple relic and autograph to 75. Panthers. JC got that spot straight up. You're guessing Saquon Jersey now? Adam? That's way too early. That's like calling shotgun from inside the house. You can't do that. Gilded Grades 5 out of 10. Brian Dawkins can't do that. The Kyler Murray rookie card. Way too early. Adam. Way too early. Doesn't even count. Now getting Zellers hopes up. Alright. Jameson Crowder to 99. Redskins. Khalil Mack to 20. And we've got a triple relic Karim Hunt. It's like we need an autograph right there. To 35. Doesn't have anything on autograph right there. Alright. Chiefs Laura from the Karim Hunt. Patch trio. And there's Mike Kosicki. 17 out of 25. Nice patch, nice auto for the Dolphins. That'll be for Scott. And there's Joey Bosa. A one of one plate for the Chargers. Kevin. All aboard the Big Head Express. What about some elements right here? There's a Debo Samuel on plate autograph. The rare Debo Samuel autograph signing. Rare on card. On plate Debo signing. That goes to Adam Cupperman. And the Niners. 13 out of 99. We've got Chris Carson. Neon signs autograph to 50. Another Seahawk for Anthony V. We've got elements of success. Alexander Madison. 48 out of 99. Vikings. That'll be for Kevin Benedict. Oh, there's number 48 out of 99. There it is. And we've got Ryan Finley. 42 out of 75. Strada football. We've got Ty Montgomery. 67 out of 600. That's a catch. That's going to the Packers Richard Fugit with that. And back here is a Steeler. That's Sammy Coates. Three color rookie auto for the Steelers. Adam Cupperman. Steelers. We've got some Origins. Alex Smith. Dalvin Cook to 175. Gerald McCoy 39. Another Mike Kosicki on card autograph this time. For the Dolphins. That'll be for Scott. Nick Chubb, Jersey in autograph. Eight out of 25. Browns. Adam Cupperman. Mason Rudolph the red nose reindeer Origins. Relic to 75. That'll be for Adam and the Steelers. And then we've got Samaj P. Ryan back there. Alright. What do we have here? Ray Lewis Ravens to 125. Aw, come on. Am I going to be able to read that? Nick, you want to take a look at this really quick? This super faded upper deck redemption. Not that they're going to do anything with it. If we can't figure it out, then we'll just randomize it to one person in the break. Yeah, this marinated too long. Let me see. Can you make any of these letters out? Anything? Anything identifying? Alright, we've got Joe Filani Titans to 225. What?  Yeah, I'm 100% serious. Titans. Where did you get Vince Young out of that? Vince Young right there. I see player name. You don't see that? Nick sees Vince Young. So 2007 will be Titans, I believe. Tennessee with that one. That'll be for Hiri Laos. Not that upper deck is pretty strict about retired redemption. So I don't know if we can get anything out of that, but there you go. You can have fun with it. Alright. Let's move on. Paul Williams. Quad Relic. It's another Titan. It's a Titans box in here. We've got for the bills. Martian Lynch. Wow. 11 out of 99. It's Bill's edition. Old Bill's edition of Martian Lynch, huh? We've got Champ Bailey. 44 out of 99. Premier patches. That's a good-looking one for the Denver Broncos. My nemesis is Alan Murdoch. And we've got 37 out of 75. Devin Hester right there. I thought that was the back of the car for a second. Premier Stitchings. That's pretty cool. Bears. That'll be for Matthew Hedges. And there you go ladies and gentlemen. Let's see what's inside that jersey. Who am I? I was part of an all rookie team. I'm an NFL receptions leader. A first team all pro, a two-time pro bowler, a second round pick, and a college football national champion. Let me give you some more stats here on this guy. I was born in Los Angeles. Went to Ohio State. 47th pick overall in the draft. An NFL offensive player of the year. A sugar bowl champion. A college football champion. A big ten champion. I have an NFL record. Most single season receptions. 149 receptions. Wow. I've got a total of 470 receptions. 5,512 receiving yards. 32 career touchdowns. I'm pretty good. Oh, he went to Taft out here in Woodland Hills. I think Scott Huffman got it first. And then Blackout soon afterwards and DFS, Zeller, etc. There you go. It's Michael Thomas. This guy is pretty good. There's the JSA right there. There's this whole number right here. JSA card inside. This should be a custom jersey. It's not super fancy, but game news gets really expensive. But that's pretty awesome. Saints. That'll be for Chris. Chris Datillo with that one. There you go, Chris. Nice finish for you. There you go. All right. Now we got some other business to take care of here. We've got this Quad Relic randomizer. Then we're randomizing. Everyone's going to have a shot at that really nice Bart Starr. So the name on top will get the Bart Starr. Second name will get the Joseph Yerbe. And the third name will get the Shock Linwood. Those guys were not associated with the NFL teams. Then we'll randomize that too. And then I'll do a quick little recap of these sort of unnecessary windows here. I need two randomizers. All right. So let's go back to this list right here. We've got Ron down to Jared. And those will be for the extra autos and the Bart Starr, of course. Then there was the Quad Relic rookie orientation with Cam Newton. Vaughn Miller. Marcel Darius who has a Buffalo Bill and AJ Green, Cincinnati. Nice Quad Relic right there. So one dice roll for both lists. Good luck. We're going to go seven times. Lucky seven. We'll do the Quad Relic first. One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven in final time. That'll be for Carolina. So let's put my list again. Carolina is going to go to JC with Carolina. Now let's flip back here. Seven times for all the names right here. One, two, three, four, five, six, and seven in final time. Top name is going to get the Bart Starr, the other two names. Name three. Thanks everyone for getting in. Really appreciate that. Name three, ASA little consolation prize. You got a shock Linwood. Who knows? Anthony. Anthony V with the Joseph Uribe and the winner of the Bart Starr autograph. The Ring of Honor Bart Starr autograph from an early 2000s top set is David Velez. There you go Dave. And there you have it ladies and gentlemen. I'm Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com. Really appreciate everybody getting in. Alright let's do a quick recap here. We're going to obviously top load all of these before they go out. That was the Vince Young. That was the Origins. So some pretty nice stuff. Couple train whistles in here too. Nice Debo. There's a train whistle. That goes to Baltimore. Scotty Phillips. Goes to Houston. Kindle goes to the Bears. That was one of the train whistles. Nice Dante Hall. Some field level stuff. Andy Isabella. 4 out of 5 Wagner. That's another. David Montgomery out of 5. A lot of train. Well then nice Kyler Murray. 49. That was pretty strong. Travis Fulham. Patrick Mahomes rookie card right there in his college gear. And the early part of the break. There are any Kosar in the mix. And we started off with Nick Tune rookie auto.  And of course we had the Michael Thomas autograph jersey right there. Perfect for framing. Some awesome stuff. Thanks for watching everybody. That was Jaspys 19 box Hail Mary football mixer featuring that Bart Starr autograph giveaway right there. Turned out to be a pretty strong mixer. I think we've got more coming up later tonight. So check that out on jaspyscasebrakes.com. I'm Joe. I'll see you next time. Bye bye.


Hello, and welcome to our presentation on transforming the scholarly publishing economy, reflections on the first three years. I'm Maureen Walsh, scholarly sharing strategist for the Ohio State University Libraries, and I am joined by my colleague Jean Springs, collection strategist for the Ohio State University Libraries. Jean and I are the co-leads of a university library strategic initiative approved in April of 2019, transforming the scholarly publishing economy. As a follow up to our CNI reporting in 2020, this briefing will focus on the status of the initiative as we take stock of the first three years and look toward renewing our strategic efforts in this space. We will highlight our current portfolio of transformational and transitional agreements, our support for open scholarly infrastructure and publishing, and our work with our consortial partners. We will also share our current thinking on future directions for our initiative. Under our initiative, we are working to shift the publishing economy to increase its benefits for researchers and authors. We have prioritized directing funds away from paywall subscription models and toward open access publishing. We are seeking to bring the publishing system more under the control of academics and the academic enterprise, and to advance a more open system with minimal paywall for users and minimum delays between author and reader. We are seeking to manage the overall cost of the publishing portion of the research enterprise, not just for libraries but for authors in the university. Our broader goals include educating, learning, informing and building partnerships with stakeholders to support actions that transform publishing economics, expand avenues of open access, extend read access and support authors' rights. And we continue to work to apply our equity values of advancing diversity, inclusivity, access and social justice. The guiding principles of our initiative inform our strategic priorities and are aligned with Ohio State's and university library's vision, mission and values. At the Foundation is making the research and scholarship of Ohio State's faculty, staff and students openly available and stewarding Ohio State's financial resources. We strive to apply our equity values of advancing diversity, inclusivity, access and social justice to all that we do, and this is a continual learning space. When considering or proposing new agreements, we focus on cost neutrality, shared fiscal risk and expanded and perpetual read access to content. Models at scale, agreements that cover the entirety of Ohio State, academic freedom, copyright retention, authors' rights and licensing for reuse are drivers of our negotiations. And we are committed to supporting pure publish, diamond open access and scholarly societies. Our strategic investments in open access follow multiple pathways and leverage collective action with our consortial partners, including the Big Ten Academic Alliance in Ohio Link. The C Libraries provides copyright and authors' rights services for the campus. Our Diamond Open Access Publishing Program is in its 15th year, and our institutional repository program, the Knowledge Bank, is in its 20th year. We support open scholarly infrastructure and publishing, including DeSpace, Fedora, Public Knowledge Project, Archive, Dryad, the Open Library of Humanities, OAPN, Directory of Open Access Journals and the Directory of Open Access Books. And we serve in governance roles for community supported open source software. To advance the opening of scholarly monographs, we are a funding institution participant in TOME toward an open monograph ecosystem. We host the Ohio State University Press Open Monographs, and we support the University of Michigan Press' Fund to Mission and MIT Press' Direct to Open programs. Our current transformative and transitional agreements include partnerships with Wiley, Cambridge University Press, PLOS, Taylor and Francis and the Royal Society. We are learning from and educating and forming and engaging with stakeholders across campus to support the goals of our initiative. Through one-on-one conversations, campus communications, online information sharing, webinars, workshops, author and editor panels and focus groups, we are looking to keep a pulse on campus in the impact of our initiative. We are engaging with faculty to understand their perspectives on scholarly publishing, evaluation and credentialing, and promotion and tenure requirements across disciplines. We are engaging with authors, editors and members of scholarly societies to better understand their needs and motivations. We are engaging with the research enterprise to analyze and better understand publisher funding streams separate from the libraries. The work of this initiative aligns well with our greater mission to support content and emerging needs of our many constituents across campus. By engaging with researchers, we can better understand the diverse need within our research communities, identify commonalities were possible, and then explore potential solutions. We hope this will lead to new and enhanced partnerships within these research communities, bridging gaps and connecting between silos to create efficiencies and cost savings and maximize value and uptake where possible. Building out intentional partnerships is an essential component of the work we've undertaken as part of this initiative. Since the global scholarly publishing market is being impacted in many directions, we've had to evolve our existing partnerships with our consortia, like the Big Ten Academic Alliance and Ohio link to establish pilot agreements. We've shifted some of what had been typical end customer relationships with publishers into partnerships that have elements of shared risk and some of the experimenting that we've been doing. And we've tried to deepen our partnerships with scholarly societies and in supporting open infrastructure, as these are woven within the complexities of this marketplace. As one broad facet of our multi-pronged approach, the agreements we've entered into as part of this initiative allow us work toward our priorities while engaging campus and building out partnerships. The Read and Publish Agreement with Taylor and Francis enabled us to be responsive to increasing demand for read access, combining it with open access publishing priorities. Our peer published agreement with PLOS initiated in the Big Ten Academic Alliance and then broadened via the Center for Research Libraries allowed us to engage across multiple consortia. And Ohio links new hybrid open access publishing agreement with Wiley allows us to work alongside our diverse consortia membership while also aligning with the Big Ten Academic Alliance on their similar agreement with Wiley. Through the Big Ten Academic Alliance, we have supported via collective action investing different types of open access publishing and open infrastructure. While we may have previously supported some of these entities in the past, it's our hope that the intentional collective action from some of our research library peers will allow for the sustainability and growth of these open ventures. Similarly, through the Big Ten Academic Alliance, we have participated in collective action investments of open access monographs. So some lessons learned from phase one of our work on this initiative. In terms of assessment, developing and iterating assessment practices is an essential component of this work, particularly as phase one PLOS, and we look toward the next phase of the initiative. This assessment allows us to understand both the value and impact, as well as reflect on working relationships within our various partnerships to identify opportunities for iteration or improvement. Some questions we need to answer go beyond a simple return on investment analysis. How can we integrate an agreement going forward, especially as the marketplace continues to independently, or interdependently evolve. What happens if we do not renew or reengage with any particular partner. Success is to build on what has worked well for us. What are the campus level impacts beyond just cost control and an increase in individual open access articles by Ohio State authors. What elements of shared learning can be identified to not only inform future decision making, but also to build upon relationships throughout campus, our consortia and beyond. We've been able to partner with a large commercial partner on a multi or pilot agreement. During this time we've met regular with several folks from the publisher, providing a variety of feedback on workflows and processes, but also maintaining dialogue about our different, but shared overarching goals of the pilot partnership. The partnership look going forward as we near the end of our initial agreement period. What can we build upon or not to achieve even more progress on our principles. Similarly, several of the agreements you've entered into have allowed us to more intentionally partner with our health sciences library. We've always worked closely together to provide cohesive collections for our distinct and shared constituencies. Work here has encouraged us to think past cost sharing and look toward how we can best articulate a shared vision for impacting scholarly publishing work to do. We've been pleased to see a number of successes and our work on this initiative, but there will always be more to do. We're going to be best interrogate our experiences to tease out how best to expand and build upon them. For instance, how do we leverage the success we've had an intro university partnerships to better engage with our campus research enterprise. Additionally, how exactly can we live our equity values via this work. What discernible impact are agreements having on different communities across our state country in the world. How do we best move past intent to capture actual impact. In the second phase of the initiative. How do we best move toward operationalizing this work, continue to develop and anchor our work and our values and guiding principles. This includes expanding diversity equity inclusion access and social justice maximizing stewardship and advocating for authors rights. Work to balance our portfolio partners. What is the right mix of nonprofit open source societies scholar led commercial publishing partners. Continue to invest in new and evolving business models, diamond open access, pure publish, read and publish, subscribe to open experiment in supporting varying resource models with our consortia as a single institution and as part of a wider community. Fine tune our strategic engagement and communication best approaches toward outreach, convening targeted conversation with stakeholders. And continue to build out assessment models. What is the impact of our prioritization of diversity equity inclusion and social justice. Have we really expanded our reach has our audience deepened and widened. What stories can we tell about this impact. Stay tuned as we share our progress on this next phase of the initiative. If you have questions or would like to contact us. Please email us at transform publishing at osu.edu. More information is available via our website library.osu.edu forward slash transforming hyphen publishing. Thank you.


Thanks everyone for coming. It's early in the morning, 10 o'clock on the, what is it, three or four? For more conference day five almost. So thanks for coming. Yeah, my topic will be continuous integration, build and test for LibreGraphics apps using GitLab and Apple. So for some of you this will not be new. For some of you it will be maybe new. I'll try and be quick with the slides so that we can have a discussion, especially since there are some people from projects in the room who already have experience with that and some other projects that don't use this yet. So it would be great to get this discussion started. So who am I? I used to be a Mac user and I also used commercial graphic software there for many, many years. Until then I finally switched to Linux and one thing I quickly noticed is that installing and getting software, especially of leading edge applications was a bit complicated on Linux. So I started my little project to make this a bit easier called App Image, which is essentially one file applications for Linux. But this talk is not mainly about that. And also what is called a drive-by contributor to open source projects. Usually whenever I see a small thing that's not right, typo or something I like to just go in there and fix that. And also I care a lot about usability of open source applications. So recently I had an interesting conversation with someone from a Libra graphics project, which is really one of the big and old and well-known ones. And I was assuming, well, this project must have hundreds of people working on it all the time. Actually I was a bit surprised when I heard there are not so many people working in the project and also not so many new people coming into the project. And I really started to ask myself, well, why is that? This great piece of software doesn't have more people contributing to it. So maybe it has to do with being welcoming and with continuously building software, making it easy. All these passwords have all skipped the passwords for today. So here's a concrete example. As I mentioned, I like to fix things whenever I encounter small errors. For example, fixing a typo. What I like to do is to go to a website where I already have login credentials, for example GitHub or GitLab. Just go in there, search for the spelling, for the wrong spelling in the full text search because I don't know where that error is, right? Click Edit, fix it, click submit, click send pull request. And now if everything is great, the project will pull it and in three minutes it's done. It's merged, a new build starts, I can download my fixed software and have the error fixed within just under five minutes. Five minutes is really too long. It's a couple of seconds if everything goes right. So unfortunately, the reality can look quite different. Some projects you go to GitHub or GitLab and you notice the project isn't there or maybe it is there but only kind of there because it's just a read-only mirror and you would have to use SVN or Mercurio or some other CLI tool which you first have to install on your machine and then download all of the source code, hundreds of megabytes and then wonder how you send the pull request. The tools actually don't send the pull request because those tools don't have the concept of pull request. Then you go to IRC and ask what should I do now and then you're told, well, just send the patch to the mailing list. You sign up for the mailing list and it still gets banned five years later just for fixing this one typo. And all of the sign up, you confirm the sign up and then you produce a patch and you send it to the mailing list and the format is wrong of the patch then you send it again and do this a couple of times. This is really complicated and that's I think the old way of doing it. So the old world, it really was a bunch of silos where you had download page and the wiki and the forum and the mailing list and some source mirrors and everything disconnected in different systems. Each of the systems needing a different login which I usually forget all the time. So really these silos make it very hard for newcomers especially to a project to just go in, make a small contribution and be done with it. So this is how a typical old world infrastructure could look. A bug tracker where you need to know how to log in. Some websites, CMS, mailing list, SVN, repose, private build servers only some people know how they work, download hosting and then the question are there nightly builds or are there no nightly builds. Then there are mirrors and everything is more or less being done manually copying back and forth things.  Now what I would propose and I'm not affiliated in any way, shape or form of GitLab or GitHub or any of those projects or companies but this is fantastic for a new contributor to open source projects. You can go to one of those websites and just submit your change and everything is nicely integrated. Everything happens in the open. Everyone see how things work. For example doing continuous builds you can just make your change and then look at the build pipelines here's an example on the right hand side where you can see that your build is now running and everything is done correctly. You get the green check mark and you see first your change is now breaking the build and also everything goes right. You can download a file for example a Windows X or Mac DMG or for Linux app image which is one file that you can download and just run. For app images there is also one additional benefit I call it binary diff or delta update especially for those of you testing continuous builds it's very convenient because there you have to download only the few bytes that have actually changed from builds to build and you don't have to redownload the whole application over time. Inkscape a great example. Inkscape just recently introduced all of that and yeah it's really I like it very much because you can clone things you can edit things online without having to download all of the source code first you can get instant reviews of what you have done, what you have broken you can download builds all along the way you can also have a discussion when you have sent a merge request which is the new kind of patch then a discussion starts where people can reference to your code you can do changes it feels very interactive and in the end it gets merged and everyone is happy. So here is an example how this works in practice a person has made their first contribution it's even mentioned there on the top of the screen and at the bottom you see the pipeline has been run and there is a green check mark so everything is fine it's working great. So I would encourage everyone of you who is not doing this yet to just do it and this is basically what I wanted to say so if you came for a lot of technical details this is not the presentation where you will learn about this and I really encourage you to investigate a bit what projects are doing for example the Inkscape project and with that I would like to open the discussion. Yes please. My answer is no way. The only way a project should lose the knowledge of their infrastructure if you put your infrastructure on a modelist or a jubilist like KitLab or GitHub in a way so much knowledge and in order to come back a type of fix is worth that. I want to keep ownership of my infrastructure. Which is completely possible. I will repeat the statement for the video so you're saying essentially a knowledge might be lost when open source projects migrate to infrastructures like KitLab. Yes. So as you might know, KitLab itself is an open source software. There is also a hosted instance where you can have everything operated by others for you but you can also set up your own instance. Sure, we do that. We create our own KitLab instance but then you have got an account there already you will need to make a new account which apparently is a huge problem. I can't believe that I commented on this. I got first-hand experience. I am with Git and Git is hosted and was always hosted in the Chrome Git repository. So it was using some Git I do not even remember because I was not involved. And recently GNOME moved to GitHub on a self-hosted instance. If anyone knows GNOME and the people for the journals they made this huge decision-making process. So, yeah. Basically, for us, we did not lose anything we didn't already have or had not. Can you go to the microphone for a song? Do you recording it?  Can you talk there? Is there a microphone there? There's one here. I would like to propose if people want to make a question they come and line up over here and then they can ask the question what are you without blocking the camera? So, when I start again. I am Michael Schumacher, also known as Schumammel with a GIMP project. And, yeah, as I just said, GIMP is hosted by GNOME and GNOME switched to GitLab. So, A, you can have your own infrastructure like if you were running some Git server before you can now run a Git server and some web interface for it as well. But it's an important distinction to make that Git is not GitHub or rather GitHub is not Git. Some people already confuse that thing. And GitLab is not GitHub and GitLab is also not Git and GitLab.com is also not GitLab. Yeah. So, about the move itself we lost a bit in comparison to when we moved from Buxilla to GitLab because some of us were really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really used to a Buxilla like stored on a bug list or whatever. One downside of GitLab I want to mention is they have a community edition and an enterprise version. And it can be really frustrating if something you have used in, for example, Buxilla however crappy the software might be and it's really not good is only available in the enterprise edition you install the community edition, hunt for it search for, like, you find it in the docs and then somebody body points out, oh no, this is enterprise. This can be a bit frustrating so if you decide to make a move to GitLab check out what exactly you are getting what you are not getting decide if you want, if the community edition is enough for a self-hosted thing or if you have to really invest into enterprise edition but then, yeah, it's not like you're not going to lose any knowledge that's not the point, that's not the point the point is I wasn't saying GitLab sucks let's not use GitLab Krita is hosted on GitLab on our own instance of GitLab we went through all of this, I know this I know the difference the argument he was making is we should not have silos we should have a single sign on just one place where people go to or two places, but not more I don't want to do my drive-by patches and if everyone moves to GitLab and GitLab own enterprise hosting service then we will lose knowledge because we won't own our own infrastructure for Krita which is part of KD which is also moving to GitLab which we are hosting ourselves we've got our own CI for now we're still keeping Buxilla but that means we keep the knowledge if we would host Krita on GitLab.com or GitHub like Inkscape is doing then we would lose that knowledge and if we wanted to go back because those companies are becoming evil like Microsoft then we wouldn't know how to do it there are at least three points here number one is the silos with silos I don't necessarily mean that everything should be on one central instance like GitHub or GitLab.com what I mean with silos is that when you have inside one open source project different pieces of infrastructure that are not working together you have to log in within that project into a two different systems for reporting a bug getting a build triggered and so forth so my point is that first of all within one project there should be a single sign on then number two ideally this single sign on would accept GitHub and or GitLab accounts which also works by the way when you're doing self hosting by just using the SSH for the single sign up for the accounts doesn't mean and this is point number three doesn't mean that you have to use the hosted instance you still can self host everything if you like I just wanted to answer what the decision we made for the Inkscape project to go to GitLab.com basically we are sort of on our own we were on launchpad before so we did not self host per se we are not in the GNOME repository we are not in KDE so we are not in a big group with a lot of infrastructure so we actually talked a lot on the mailing list about this possibility of going to GitHub GitLab.com or self host either GitLab or something else and we found that GitHub is not free so it was a big bad point the only good point for GitHub was actually that quote everybody is there but we made the decision to GitLab as a trade off basically because we can go to GitLab and then get off that was the main point for GitLab.com and we did not have any infrastructure work before because we were on launchpad which was not very developed at that point by Canonical not really abundant but not really growing or having new things so we felt that GitLab was growing projects with lots more functionalities and since we did not want we don't have a lot of contributors or a bigger group like KDE or GNOME so we did not want to add this work of hosting and maintaining or Git hosting mechanisms so we felt like we can get on GitLab and if they become evil if they become source forge we can get off and self-host if needed but we can have these free runners they have a lot of things that are very practical but we could do if we wanted to so I agree that we are not in control of our infrastructure but we could be if we want and that was something very important Quick follow-up question to you did you already notice some change in the type of contributions you get? I think it's simplified contributions so we got a lot of more contributions than when we were on Bazaar and Launchpad which I was not convinced of that before the switch but it actually happened Thank you I want to just say that our silos are going to change also thanks to work done by Simon so there is one silo which we need to GitLab as soon as possible as soon as possible Thank you That's the perfect ending point for this session Thank you very much


This project that I'm going to talk about is something that I've been, we've been doing with ACRL, and that's the Association of College and Research Libraries, which is a division of the Association of the American Library Association. And we're looking at the higher education trends, and this is a very aggressive project. We started in August, and we have to be finished in June. And when I looked at the higher ed literature, what I found the top things, and this just came out last week in the Chronicle of Higher Ed, the top trends were information literacy, the safety net, so this campus is safe for individuals, the sanctuary campus, the cultural divide, defending diversity, and harassment vigilance. Then I looked at Times Higher and tried to pull some topics from there. What came out that I thought matched somewhat was this improving digital literacy, the cultural wars, the Brexit, we have our own sort of Brexit happening, and free speech. And when this project that we're doing right now with ACRL, the title is How Far Have We Come and What Do We Do Next? And we were asked to come up with an agenda for action-based research on student learning and success. And ACRL has done quite a bit of work on this in the past. I don't know if any of you are familiar with a study that was published in 2010. It was called The Value of Academic Libraries or The Vowel Study, and that is one of the things that we used as our basis so that we could move from that 2010 to today. What we did is we have three data sources, and it's an iterative process. So as I said, we've been looking at a lot of literature. We looked at LIS literature, we looked at higher ed literature, and then we looked at the literature that was higher education that included library and information science. So we looked at these separately. We did content analysis, and so we were looking, again, at themes, trends, and also types of research. As you can imagine, I should ask you, what do you think, as far as a research method, what do you think we use a lot of surveys? We like to do surveys. And then we do a lot of interviews now as well, because as one librarian told me, it's just talking to people. And so we do a lot of that until it comes time to coding, and then we don't have a lot of data. So that's something we have to remember. When you collect it, you need to probably analyze it and disseminate it. We also came up with an advisory group, and this is for 14 individuals who are library deans or directors in different types of library, academic library. So we have community colleges. We have your four-year colleges. We have your research universities. We also looked at them regionally, because there are some regional differences in the US. And so we looked at the four regions of the US. We also looked at the secular, non-secular private public. So we wanted to have a representative from each of these groups or several representatives from these groups. And so we have a nice, I think, sample to look at, because the community colleges' issues are very different than what we're hearing from the research libraries. Now, another thing that I was concerned about with this project is that, and I heard some of it today, the open access, the data management, the data reuse, we are not touching on that because ACRL is siloed. There's another group that's studying that, which I think in some ways is a disadvantage that it's not all one big piece. So you won't hear that from me today. This is all on student success and learning. We also, these 14 individuals who are an advisory group, had to make a commitment that they would introduce us to someone in their provost office, which is probably your chancellor, vice chancellor, who would talk to us and we would be able to interview that. So that was part of the deal, that if they came on for the advisory group, we had to have a connection. As I said, we looked at the literature from 2010 to 2016, but every day I find more, so it's in 2017, now it's creeping. We took the themes from the 2010 VAL report. Most of the studies were published in the U.S. However, we do have some U.K. and Australia, because Australia seemed to be much more advanced in this area than we were in the U.S. So we were looking at their literature as well to get some ideas. This was an easy way to depict some of the topics, the themes that came out. You'll see, and this is all of the literature, so the higher ed and library and information science literature. You'll see collaboration, learning in college, service, communication, success in college. Research support is there as well. And again, that isn't an area that we were looking at. Now, when you look at these themes, the orange is the combination of higher education and LIS literature. And the sort of purplish color is the higher ed literature, and the turquoise is library and information science literature. You'll see the combination of the higher ed and LIS is service. When you just look at the LIS literature, it's the service. And that came up a lot. When we talk to the advisory group, service comes up a lot. When you talk to provost, that's not it. Now, they may define service differently, so it could be the context, it can be semantics, but service wasn't on their minds. You'll see with the higher ed what was really important is the success in college. Why? Because right now in higher ed, funding is tight. It's probably going to get tighter. And so everyone's competing. And so the universities are competing within themselves and with each other. And so it's very important to demonstrate success, but it's also very difficult. And how do you define success? And so those are some of the things that we're trying to get to. So as I said, we have this advisory group. We conducted a virtual focus group interview. It was 90 minutes. We transcribed the, we recorded and transcribed this interview. We used EnVivo, which is a software, it's basically a big database, but it's a software package for qualitative data. And so that we could run some numbers and look at themes. We made sure that we have an army working on this project. And two doctoral students who did the majority of the coding.  And so then they had to start over. And it's another reason why we, it's a project that's taking a lot of energy, but also is on a very fast timeline. When we looked at the focus group interviews, the librarians talked a lot about communication. They needed to communicate to their administration, to the faculty, to the students. They talked a lot about collaboration, service, and being involved in institutional planning. You'll also see the research support there as well. It was interesting to see where collections fall. And it wasn't something they talked about a lot. These are some quotes that I wanted to give to you. Now this is a research university, academic university librarian, a secular public. We had to take away the regional part because then you could identify the individuals because our advisory group is public. So I can't tell you where this individual is from. But what the individual was saying is that she said, I think part of our success in reaching to students and faculty is the way we collaborate with others. And she kept talking a lot about collaboration. And another one said librarians must have the ability to recognize how the multiple stakeholders within their specific university ecosystem interrelate and leverage their relationships to attain shared goals rather than just library oriented goals. And so looking at the big picture and becoming a part of the university. Another one was talking about, and this comes up a lot, that this fake news. And where do we come in? This is really important now that we need to be educating these individuals on how to be good citizens and how to evaluate the literature, the news, and be critical thinkers. Not just in their academic work, but in their everyday lives. And that came up a lot. I must say these interviews were before, with the advisory group, before the presidential election. Now when I interviewed the provost, it was the day after the presidential election and that week. So we have some very interesting data that we probably wouldn't have had two weeks before. So with the provost, these were individual interviews because we did not want them to be afraid to talk with other provost because they may not want to tell their secrets or their fears. We asked them questions like, how do you envision higher ed in the next five years? Which was a really scary question to them the day after the election. And we took detailed notes, again, we did the coding. And you look at this, communication again is very important. They just kept talking about how we have to communicate. And librarians need to communicate their worth, their value. One provost constantly talked about the journals and how much money he spends on journals. And he came from a science background. And to him, that was the most important thing were these journals. But why are they so expensive? And he was obsessed with that. Institutional planning, another thing. Learning in college. But that learning in college, again, was looking at their everyday lives. They talked about their Greek lives. So their lives with the sororities and fraternities. They talked about their everyday lives when they're out with sports and different things. And this is a quote from one of the provost, non-secular private. People are talking about the problems of educating people to be citizens more. With this election being indicative of that. This is a hard thing to confront right now, because we are going to have an administration that doesn't think that's important at all. And so his concern was how are we going to educate people, to be critical thinkers, and to be good citizens. Whenever we may not have the support of our government to do that. And this provost was from a public university research. And the drive to knowing more about what students get from a college education is not going to go away. We are going to have to continually look at quality. This drive towards knowing what students get from their college education is going to continue to be important. And I can't imagine that part of it would go away with a Trump administration. And this was the constant theme of the interviews. And many ways I was a psychologist to them. And I had to keep bringing them back to what we wanted to know. And some of the interviews went on, they were supposed to be 45 minutes. And that was hard to get from a provost. Some of them went on for an hour and a half, almost two hours. And I do think it was because of the timing. Now, when you look at the themes of the advisory group, which are the academic library administrators, to the provost. Now, the advisory group are the dark blue lines. The provost are the turquoise lines. Communication is very important to both. But look at the service with the librarian compared to the librarians compared to the provost. These are some more quotes and I don't want to, I'll let you read them. But I just want to say that this whole learning is very important. And this again is a provost. And what was coming out was librarians need to be thinking more as educators and to be a part of the teaching and learning, which we have been. But we haven't told anyone that we are. They're not seeing it as teachers. And I think it's because we talk in terms of service. Again, this learning and service, this is an advisory group member. And the advisory group member is talking about shared initiatives on campus. And how we need to be involved in that and look at the institutional planning and the mission of the university and be a part of that, contribute to that. Space, this was the provost, of course space was of concern. And he kept saying, I want a place where the students can come together. They need to have a place where they can study, where they can meet each other. So, and he talked about pulling them together. Again, the space and collaboration. And one of the advisory group members said, we share our space with the writing lab. We share our space with the computer labs. But that's not it. Sharing space isn't what it's about. It's actually sharing programs. Sharing these ideas of teaching together, learning together. We should be with them teaching in these labs. And so it was very important to them that we don't just look at the space of sharing. Service, this was a provost. And he said, many of our faculty and students research now. It's less about going to a physical space, but about accessing information in their offices. And he thought this was a challenge for some of the librarians. Privacy seems to be more of an issue with us as librarians than with others. And we're so afraid of collecting data and how much data we can collect, because we don't want to inform anyone outside of this institution or even within the institution of what individuals are doing. When we've interviewed doctoral students, they were very worried to use any kind of an online reference service because they thought that their major professors would know that they did not know something. And so privacy is very important to us, but the advisory group, this advisory group member was saying, we need to put some of this aside. We need to collect data and report data in different ways and not be afraid to collect some of this demographic information and to track individuals for five years after they leave the university. These are just some of our recommendations to identify and articulate both learning and success outcomes, which sounds easy, but it's really not. Focus less on service and more on sharing space and collaborative programming. Again, this whole collaboration that came out with both the librarians and the provost, the collaboration, the communication. This whole idea of assessment and looking at student-centered outcomes. That's and look at diverse populations. Diversity came up quite a bit as well. And we need to be looking at all different types of individuals and their needs, whether they're learning challenges or their everyday life challenges. Develop relationships and it's all relationship building. And we've been hearing that a lot too. It's amazing that someone said it's amazing what you can learn and do if you just walk around campus sometime and talk to people. Continue to develop and foster these relationships and engagement with the academic administrators, faculty, students, the research groups. Represent data in different ways. That was another thing that kept coming up. We don't know how to present information to different audiences. And so we need to learn how to do that and a picture will tell a thousand words and it's hard to find that one picture. Priority areas are these, we came up with six. Communication, collaboration, mission, strategy and alignment, teaching and learning, student success. And then we are coming up with questions within each of these priority areas. And these are examples of the questions within this student success priority area. And these are the areas that we will target in future research. And hope that we can get funding agencies to also start looking at these areas. So these were just some of the research questions. And our last priority area is learning analytics. And that's something we haven't been doing well in the US, especially in the academic library environment. The next steps, this month we'll be showing our visualization tool. So we've taken all the literature that we've used and we're going to have this interface where individuals can put in themes, you can put in journal titles, you can put in the color. You can put in many different things and the methods. If you're interested in a type of research method, you can put in the type of institution, so if it's a community college or a research university. And find out what the literature is saying and then move on from there. You can maybe learn from that, hopefully. Or you can also develop your own research in that area. In May we'll have this full report. It will be out for public comment. We also have a report out now that's the first draft. It does not have the research questions yet. That's what we're working on now. But again, we have open times for public comment. And this should all be available in June and we will present it at the ALA conference. And we have, as I said, this has been, it took a village to do this. And I think it's going to continue to take a village to finish this. And I've just been very lucky to have individuals who really share the same vision as I do and see this as something very important. Thank you.