Good afternoon, everybody. It's a privilege and honor to welcome Professor Takaki Kajita as our today's speaker in this lecture series, jointly organized with Ryukyu Shimpu. Kajita has spent his career addressing questions that are as old as the human race itself, such as those famously posed by the French painter Paul Gauguin. Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Well, some of these questions can be addressed using scientific means. So where do we come from? The best supported CLV of the origin of our university centers on an event, as we all know, called the Big Ben. This theory was born of the observation that other galaxies are moving away from our own at great speed in all directions as if they had all been propelled by an ancient explosive force. It's thought that this acceleration is driven by a force that repels gravity called dark energy. We still don't know what dark energy is, but physicists think that it makes up 68% of the universe's total matter and energy. Dark matter makes up another 27%. In essence, all matter you have ever seen from your first love to the stars overhead makes up less than 5% of the universe. Discovering what components make up our universe is a crucial step towards an understanding where we come from. Takaki Kajita has delivered a major finding to address that question. Kajita was born in Higashi Matsuyama, Saitama, Japan. He studied physics at Saitama University and then the University of Tokyo where he received his PhD in 1986 working under the 2002 Nobel Laureate, Masatoshi Koshiba. Since 1988, Kajita has been affiliated with the Institute for Cosmic Ray Research at the University of Tokyo, rising to professor in 1999 and director in 2008. Kajita has received numerous awards for his work and in 2015, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics jointly with the Canadian physicist Arto Macdonald for his work on neutrinos. We live in a world of neutrinos. There are billions in this room right now traveling almost at the speed of light. Neutrinos are the second most abundant particles in the universe after light carrying particles known as photons. They are created in nuclear reactions, for example in the sun and stars or in nuclear reactors. They interact very little with the environment and they drift through the earth and our bodies like wind through a screen door. There are three kinds of neutrinos, electron neutrinos, muon neutrinos and tau's neutrinos. Kajita and Macdonald won the Nobel Prize for their discovery that neutrinos can change identity. For example, a muon neutrino can become a tau neutrino and vice versa. They oscillate between different types. As the Nobel Prize committee stated, the discovery implies that neutrinos, which were believed to be massless, do have a mass even if very little and since there are so many of them, it changes our view of the universe. In a news conference at the University of Tokyo shortly after the Nobel announcement Kajita said, I want to thank the neutrinos of course and since the neutrinos are created by cosmic rays, I want to thank them too. Detecting neutrinos was considered almost impossible for a long time ever since 1930 when the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli suggested their existence. He later joked that he has done a terrible thing. He said, I have postulated a particle that cannot be detected. Thank God he was wrong. Hence, revealing the neutron's identity and characteristics required an ingenious setup. That ingenious setup has a name, the super cameochande detector. The super cameochande is a neutrino observing facility located 1,000 meters underground in Hida City, Gifu Prefecture. And I'm sure you will tell us more about it and probably also shows on beautiful slides. Kajita's experiments with the super cameochande along with McDonald's experiments at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada confirmed experimentally that neutrinos can change from one identity to another. Therefore, the discovery of neutrino oscillations became definitive proof that neutrinos have a mass that is not zero. The experiments rewrote the balance sheet of the universe and we now know that the collective weight of the neutrinos once thought to be massless is about equal to the collective weight of stars in the cosmos. But Professor Kajita dedicated his life not just doing his own scientific work. He has taken on greater responsibilities for science and society as a whole. In October this year, he became the president of the Science Council of Japan, enabling him to promote and enhance science in Japan and beyond. In this role, he publicly had to take a stand against Prime Minister Suga defending the independence and autonomy of science and science management decisions. After Prime Minister Suga decided not to appoint academics who have been critical of the nation's security and anti-conspiracy legislation to a science council, the chair of who is here, that makes policy recommendation to the government. We are very happy, Professor Kajita, to have you here and we are looking forward to a great talk. I think all of us give him a warm welcome. Thank you for coming. Thank you very much. I think, no? It must be okay, yeah. Okay. Well, it's my pleasure to give a talk here in OIST. So today, I'm going to talk about the universe with, well, exploring the universe with neutrinos and gravitational waves. Well, actually, this title is rather general, but well, I have to apologize maybe before starting. I'm going to talk about our work, maybe 80% of this talk, so I hope it's okay. Okay, well, this is the outline. First, I'm going to talk about the neutrinos studies in Kamioka. Then I want to move on to the gravitational waves. That is the rather, well, for us, it's a new project. The project name is called Kagura. So I'm going to talk about the gravitational waves and I'll summarize this talk. Okay, now, I want to begin from the Kamiokanda experiment. Well, in the 80s, large underground detectors were constructed to observe proton decays. In the 70s, grand unified theories predicted, grand unified theories of elementary particles predicted that protons should decay with the lifetime of about 10 to 30 years. Well, actually, 10 to 30 years seems to be, well, of course, long, but seems to be detectable. Therefore, several experiments were constructed and here, I show you two examples. One is the IMB experiment in United States. That was 8,000 ton water detector. And another example showing, right, is the Kamiokanda experiment. That was slightly smaller than IMB. That was only 3,000 tons. So from now on, I'm mostly going to talk about the Kamiokanda experiment. First of all, let me introduce the location of this experiment. Well, of course, this is the map of Japan. I'm sorry, Okinawa is not shown here, but anyway. Well, the location of the experiment is there. So you see where you expect the mountain area and you are right. So this is the photo of the Kamioka site. And if you look at the photo carefully, you can see some facilities in the mountain. That is the mining facility. So Kamiokanda was constructed in an active mine. And the mountain for the mining is shown in the right. And well, and I want to show you this photo. This photo was taken in the spring of 1983, where we constructed the Kamiokanda detector. And well, first of all, you can see a gentleman in front in the middle. That is Professor Koshiba. And he was my thesis advisor. And as I introduced, he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2002 based on his work in Kamiokanda. Anyway, so at the time, we are about to enter into the mine to construct the detector. And well, oh, by the way, I want to say behind Professor Koshiba, there are four young students. And they were the member of the Kamiokanda team. And of course, one of them was me. And these four members worked several months in underground to construct the Kamiokanda detector. Anyway, the construction was successful. And we started the experiment in July, 1983. And of course, we wanted to observe the proton decay. But as you may know, proton lifetime was much longer than initially expected. So we didn't observe any proton decay. But well, I think Professor Koshiba was great. After several months, we started observing proton decay but realizing that the Kamiokanda detector is very sensitive. Then he proposed to combat the proton decay experiment to a neutrino experiment, trying to observe neutrinos from the sun. And therefore, we came back to the mine in 1984 and started the work to modify the detector. And the work continued for several years. And we were able to start the stable operation in January, 1987. Now, I want to show you this slide. This is actually, sorry, this is written in Japanese, but I don't go into detail. This is actually the history of a star. If the mass is small, then it will have a very long life. If a star is the size like the our sun, then well, the life will be around, say. 10 billion years. If the star is heavier than our sun, say 10 times heavier, then the life should be much shorter and finally, at the end, it will explode. This was actually taken from a popular science magazine in the 80s. So this kind of story, this kind of star life was theoretically understood. But at the time, we didn't really confirmed this final stage is really true. Then in February, 1987, a supernova occurred a supernova occurred in large magnetic cloud that is the galaxy next to our Milky Way galaxy. This is a photo before the supernova explosion and you can see a star here, then this is after. So, a supernova happened and fortunately, as I said, at that time, we resumed the data taking in Kamiokande. So we look at the data and we found 11 neutrino events within 13 seconds. This is a summary of the supernova-neutrino observation by three experiments, Kamiokande, IMB and Baxan experiments. So in total, 24 neutrino events were observed observed by three detectors on this date. And with this, we understood the basic mechanism of the supernova explosion. And therefore, Professor Koshiba received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2002. Okay, well, that was the story and with this, we confirmed this. Heavy star's life. However, I have to tell you, around that time, although we generally understood that at the end of the star's life, these heavy stars should explode. But around that time, essentially, no one was able to reproduce this process by simulation. However, because of the actual observation, people were more serious to reproduce the supernova explosion by simulation. But well, around that time, no one was successful. And only in recent days, people were able to reproduce the supernova explosion or I'm sorry, I cannot control. Well, okay. So this tells you how the heavy metals were produced by nuclear fusion processes in stars. Then at the end, iron is produced. Then normal fusion processes continues. Then because of the extreme pressure, this center core collapse. Well, of course, that kind of general picture was understood. The point was, well, if you look at the simulation carefully, you notice that the simulation does not assume sphericity. In fact, this kind of full 3D simulation was essential to really reproduce the supernova explosion. Anyway, I think we contributed to the simulation community to motivate them trying to reproduce the data. So that way, I think we contributed to their community. Anyway, okay, move on. Okay, that was one example. In addition, of course, we confirmed or we observed the solar neutrinos as we wanted. And also we confirmed with this, we confirmed the energy generation mechanism of the sun that is nuclear fusion processes. And also we confirmed the solar neutrino deficit. For this, I'll come back later. Furthermore, we observed neutrinos created by cosmic rays. These cosmic ray neutrinos were studied in Kamiokande because they were the background for the proton decay searches. Then unexpectedly, we find that there's a problem. We observed a deficit of atom-seq muon neutrinos. And that was the initial hint for the neutrinosilations, atom-seq neutrinosilations. So these are the brief summary of the Kamiokande experiment. And with this, I think we were able to convince the community that water-challenged of detector is very useful for neutrino physics and astrophysics. Therefore, the Japanese government approved the next generation neutrino detector that was super Kamiokande. Super Kamiokande is a bigger version of the initial Kamiokande detector. It is about 40 meters in diameter and 40 meters in height, containing 50,000 tons of very clean water. It is an international collaboration. We have about 190 collaborators from 10 countries. And the real detector looks like this. This photo was taken in January, 96, when we essentially finished the construction at the time. We are filling pure water. Very clean water into the super Kamiokande tank. And you can see the water level. You can identify the water level by recognizing a small plastic boat. So this is the detector to study neutrinos. And the experiment started in April, 96. Now I want to discuss the results from this experiment. As I briefly mentioned, neutrinos are created in the atmosphere of the earth. Cosmic particles interact with air nucleus and produce typically pions. And pions decay to muons, then to electrons. During this decay chain, neutrinos are created. And these neutrinos are studied in super Kamiokande. By the way, eventually it is about 10 neutrinos per day. So we have high statistics. And well, in fact, due to this high statistics, we were able to announce the first important result after two years of the data taking. That announcement was made in the Mutino Conference in June, 98. And here I show you the copy of the slide we showed at the conference. And well, of course, 98 was more than 20 years ago. And therefore the technology was completely different. Around that time, we didn't have PowerPoint. Instead, we had plastic seats. So around that time, we copied the data to the transparent plastic seats and wrote down several comments. Well, but of course, there is a reason that I show you this slide. This slide was so important. In particular, the lower one was very important. This is for muon neutrinos. And cosine theta means gene-sangle. One means down-going neutrinos. Minus one means upward-going neutrinos. Of course, these neutrinos came from the other side of the earth. And small black circles with error bars show the data and these hatched histograms show the Monte Carlo prediction. And you immediately notice for down-going neutrinos, the data and Monte Carlo simulation agreed quite well. However, for upward-going neutrinos, the data showed almost a fact of two deficit. And this can be very well understood if you take into account the neutrino oscillation. And therefore, of course, we carried out the oscillation analysis. And the analysis results are shown here. Using this data together with some other data, the oscillation parameter constraint is shown here. Oh, by the way, this is, well, so a bit technical. This is the mixing angle, sine square two theta, mixing angle of neutrinos versus the delta M square, neutrino mass square difference. Anyway, that is maybe two detail. Anyway, this is the fit result. A lot of reason was here. And we have another data samples. And all of these essentially suggested one parameter space. And all of these turned out to be just consistent. Therefore, Super Kamioka and we concluded that the observed Zins angle dependent deficit and the other supporting data gave evidence for neutrino oscillations. That was 98. Okay. Then, well, I think Super Kamioka was lucky because we had an accelerator facility that is KIK. And they had a proton synchrotron and they decided to produce a neutrino beam with the existing proton synchrotron. And with the baseline links between the proton synchrotron in KIK and Super Kamioka was 250 kilometers. And with this configuration, we confirmed the neutrino oscillation. Furthermore, we were even more lucky. KIK together with the, I think, JAA. But had a plan to construct a new accelerator called J-PAC. This is a very high-intensity proton machine. And it's this. They decided to produce very high-intensity neutrino beam directing to the direction of Super Kamiokande. And therefore, we were able to do the second-generation long-based line experiment. And with this, we were able to confirm the three-flavor oscillation effect. That means most of the muonutinos oscillate to tau-nutinos that was confirmed with this experiment. But with this experiment, we confirmed a small fraction of the muonutino changed to an electron-nutino. So I think Super Kamiokande together with these accelerators were very successful in studying the neutrino properties. Now, I want to briefly mention about the solar neutrino oscillations. Well, of course, the sun generates energy by nuclear fusion processes. And during these processes, many neutrinos are generated. Therefore, more than 50 years ago, some people thought that we should confirm the nuclear fusion processes in the sun by observing solar neutrinos. And this is the copy of the first solar neutrino experiment led by Ray Davis. And this was located in Homestake in the United States. And this Homestake solar neutrino experiment observed solar neutrinos for the first time, slightly more than a half-century ago. However, there was a problem. The event rate was only about one-third of the prediction. And there were subsequent solar neutrino experiments, but the problem was just confirmed by the subsequent experiments in the 80s and 90s. So this was called solar neutrino problem. Then, earlier in this century, this problem was understood to be due to solar neutrino oscillations. And the main experiment that understood the solar neutrino problem was the snow experiment. This was another challenge of the detector, but instead of normal water, they used heavy water. They used one-third of tons of heavy water. And in fact, this is a very expensive experiment. Heavy water is not so cheap. Anyway, using heavy water is extremely important. That is very important. Let me tell you why. With heavy water, of course, there are deuterons. Then, electron neutrinos interact with the deuteron producing E minus Pp. And this way, a snow experiment can measure the electron neutrino flux. Independently, neutrino can interact with a deuteron, this integrating this deuteron into proton plus neutron. And this is a neutral current. Therefore, this interaction does not depend on the neutrino type. Therefore, the event rate is simply proportional to the total neutrino flux. And the result is shown here. If they observe the electron neutrino flux, the event rate was about one-third of the prediction. However, if they observe the total neutrino flux, then the event rate was just as expected. That means two-third of the neutrinos are muonutino plus tau-neutrinos. And therefore, this way, people are convinced that the solar neutrino deficit was due to neutrino oscillations. And by the way, here is the super-camiocand data. And super-camiocand observe solar neutrinos by neutrino-electron scattering. And in this process, we mainly observe electron neutrinos, but we are also sensitive to muon plus tau-neutrinos with lower cross-section. Then they observed flux was this much, and in fact, this was just consistent with the SNOR result. So this way, we understood that the solar neutrino deficit was due to neutrino oscillations. Now, okay, so far, I have briefly, well, I have discussed our experimental work. And with these works, we observed, we found that neutrinos have small mass because neutrinos oscillate. Then you may ask, why the neutrino mass is so important? Well, of course, electrons have mass, quarks have mass. And in fact, this shows the mass of elementary particles. There are three charged leptons, three types of charged leptons. These mass are shown by these red colors. There are six types of quarks. These mass are shown by these blue and green colors. Now, after 20 years of intensive studies of neutrinos, we almost understand the neutrino mass value. And let me plot the neutrino mass. They are here. So, you notice that neutrinos are much smaller than the corresponding mass of charged leptons and quarks. And in particular, if you want to be a little bit more careful, well, if you read the figure a little bit more careful, you immediately notice that the neutrino mass approximately, or maybe more than, 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the corresponding mass of quarks and charged leptons. So, 10 orders of magnitude difference. So, neutrino mass are extremely small. And we believe that this is the key to better understand elementary particles in the universe. So, therefore, we are excited with the neutrino mass. And of course, if we understand why neutrino mass are so small compared with the other charged leptons with other particles mass, then we believe that we better understand elementary particles. But why the universe is relevant? Well, we think the neutrino mass is relevant to our better understanding of the universe. And let me explain why we think so. Well, this is a photo of the five universe taken from the net. And we see many stars and galaxies. And we know that all these stars and galaxies are made of matter. We know there are no antimatter galaxy, no antimatter star. This is a bit strange if we think about the Big Bang universe. In the Big Bang universe, the universe was extremely hot. Then in this extremely hot universe, always matter particles and antimatter particles are created simultaneously. So, in the Big Bang universe, the number of matter particles and antimatter particles should have been equal. Then with the universe cooled down, matter particles and antimatter particles meet and annihilate, disappear. Therefore, naively, we expect no matter in the present day universe. But of course, we observe matter in the universe. Why? Well, we have an answer. We know, we expect that in the Big Bang universe, there was say one billion, one matter particle. But the number of antimatter particles was one billion. They were almost equal. Then with the universe cooled down, matter particles and antimatter particles meet and annihilate. Then we have this one in the present day universe. So, this way we can explain. Of course, one billion, one is almost equal to one billion, but not exactly. Therefore, we have to explain why there was this extra one in the Big Bang universe. And in fact, we do not know why. But we think that neutrinos with very small mass might be the key to understand this extra one in the Big Bang universe. But well, actually, this is just a possibility. So, we have to confirm experimentally if this idea is correct. Therefore, in the neutrino community, there are big projects going on. One is in United States, one is in Japan. And we'd like to observe if oscillation of neutrinos and those of anti-neutrinos are different. If the difference is observed, it will be the first step to understand origin of the matter in the universe. Namely, we'd like to observe the difference in neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. This is called CP violation. And this is the sensitivity of these two experiments. Well, of course, these experiments are under construction. Therefore, we do not have any data. Therefore, this is the expectation, assuming 10 years of experiments with these projects, then this is the sensitivity or significance of the difference between oscillation of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos as a function of the CP phase delta. So first of all, this is for the U.S. Project Dune, and this is for the project located in Japan, Hyper-Kamiokande, and this is the significance of the statistical significance of the difference of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. And therefore, depending on, of course, the statistical significance depends on the CP phase angle delta, but you see for a large fraction of the phase space, these experiments will observe the difference between neutrinosilations and anti-neutrinosilations. Well, of course, these are the expectations we have to construct the detector. And let me mention about the status of the experiment. Well, since I'm slightly involved in Hyper-K, Japanese project, so let me mention about the status of the Hyper-Kamiokande. So the detector itself will be like this. It will be about 70 meters in height and 70 meters in diameter. The fiduciary mass is about 10 times larger than the present Super-Kamiokande. So this is really going to be a huge detector. And because of this huge mass, we expect many important research in neutrinophysics and astrophysics. And the construction has just started in this year and the experiment will start hopefully in 2027. And this is an international collaboration. We have more than 400 members from 19 countries. Well, okay, maybe I spend too much time, but I want to move on to the gravitational waves. Well, I said that I'm slightly involved in this Hyper-Kamiokande. That means I'm mostly involved in something else. And that is gravitational waves. And slightly more than 10 years ago, I thought that I want to do something new. So I decided to change my research from neutrinos to gravitational waves. Well, okay, maybe I should, I, well, I don't know if I, okay, yeah, anyway. Say, suppose there are two black holes orbiting each other, then from this kind of system, we expect gravitational waves. So say this is the expected gravitational wave signal by emitting the gravitational waves. They come closer and orbiting faster. Come closer, closer. Of course, this is moving. So it's got slowed down and much. A new heavier black hole is formed. Then if you look at the outer space, you'll notice that the gravitational wave is propagating to the outer space. So we expect to observe these signals, but the question is how can we observe these signals? And, well, for this audience, I don't want to show the movie. We are going to use the laser interferometer. Then, well, you may remember, more than four and a half year ago, there was an announcement. This was the first observed signal of gravitational wave and this was the simulation. So the signal and simulation agreed quite well. Furthermore, there were two detectors and the signals from the two detectors agreed quite well. So is this the LIGO, scientific collaboration announced the discovery of gravitational wave? I said there are two detectors. They are located here and here in United States. And of course, you notice that these detectors are very large. Yes, we need very large laser interferometers to observe gravitational waves because the expected effect due to gravitational waves is extremely small. And actually, I want to tell you how small the expected effect is. Here, I show you the sun and the earth. The distance is 150 million kilometers. Then, if a big gravitational wave come, that can be detectable with the present generation detectors, then the distance between the sun and the earth changes. The question is, how much distance change do we expect? The answer is we expect 10 to minus eight centimeter over 150 million kilometers. So every gravitational wave detector has to be sensitive to this length change. Unfortunate thing is every laser interferometer we have on the earth have only three to four kilometer arm lengths. Therefore, these detectors must be sensitive to the length change of 10 to minus 16 centimeters in three to four kilometers.  Anyway, you have to target this number in three to four kilometers. Anyway, LIGO interferometer in United States and Virgo in Europe were able to come to this sensitivity. And they were able to observe many signals of the mergers of binary black holes. Here, the vertical axis shows the mass of these black holes in unit of the solar mass. So LIGO and Virgo collaborations observed many mergers of black holes with the typical mass of several tens of solar mass. Furthermore, they find an interesting event. These two stars mesh to a heavier one. In fact, these two are neutron stars. And well, in fact, this signal, well, this merger was rather close to the earth. Therefore, they had rather precise measurement of this event and they were able to have to decide that they were able to determine the direction of this event rather precisely. And then astronomers followed, well observed, a tractor observed the new star here, this one. And they found this one. Well, previously there was no bright star, but after the merger, they found this one. So because of the successful pointing of the binary neutron star merger, the optical community followed the observation. And then there were several optical observations. And in fact, with these follow-up observations, people realized, for example, heavy metals were created with this event. So now it's clear that we can do many important science with gravitational waves. And well, this is the science we can carry out with the present generation experiment. And we'd like to observe the merger of binary neutron stars and we want to understand the origin of the heavy metals in the universe. Of course, with the 2017 observation, we knew, already knew that heavy metals were created. Furthermore, we'd like to observe the merger of binary neutron, no, binary black holes. And in fact, these observations already told, tells us the new mystery. These black holes were rather heavy than we expected. So we'd like to understand how these black holes were created. Maybe these black holes were the initial hint for the first generation stars. Astronomers expect that the first generation stars should have been much heavier than the present generation stars. So with gravitational waves, we may be observing the evidence for the first generation stars. And finally, we'd like to observe supernova explosion with gravitational waves. And we'd like to understand better how the supernova explode. So we have a lot of science. Therefore, we'd like to study more on gravitational waves. And therefore, in Japan, we have been constructing the Kagura Interferometer. Well, although this is located in Japan, it's another international collaboration. We have about 400 members from 10 countries. So this is the sketch of the Kagura Interferometer. It is located again in Kamioka, in the mountain, underground. And in fact, we decided to construct the Interferometer in underground because in underground, and the seismic activities are much smaller. Typically, two orders of magnitude smaller. Therefore, that is an advantage for the gravitational wave interferometer. Furthermore, in Kagura, we are going to use cryogenic mirrors. As I said, we have to measure the length change of 10 to minus 16 centimeters over three kilometers. Therefore, the thermal effect is a problem to achieve 10 to minus 16 length change sensitivity. Therefore, we decided to cool down the mirrors. Anyway, the project was approved in 2010. Well, when project was approved, of course, we had no tunnel for the interferometer. Therefore, initially, we had to excavate the tunnel. Then after the completion of the excavation, we installed the three kilometer by three kilometer vacuum tubes. These are the photos of the three kilometer vacuum tubes. Well, this is big, 80 centimeters in diameter. Anyway, the connection and the leak test of three by three kilometer beam tubes have been finished in March, 2015. And after that, we begin to install the mirrors into the vacuum tanks. One of the mirrors looks like this. This is one of the cryogenic mirrors. It is 22 centimeter in diameter, 15 centimeter in thickness, and the weight is 23 kilograms. And well, actually, this is the preparation of the mirror at the University of Toyama. Then this mirror is moved to the Kamioka site. And in November, 2017, we installed the first cryogenic mirror into this huge cryostat. And this photo was taken at the time, and you notice that these many people contributed to install just one mirror into the cryostat. And well, of course, we have many other things to do, and now the experimental area looks like this. So everything is covered, every important part is covered by a cream booth. And so you cannot see the detail, but anyway, here is the beam spritter and beam spritter tank. And with this mirror, the beam is split into two. And also, well, of course, this is the inside the tunnel. But after the completion of the construction, we cannot access to the underground because the human activity is a noise to the gravitational wave observation. Therefore, after the completion of the construction, every work is remote work, remote work where we have outside office, outside of the mine, and then people, young people, in particular young people, are working hard to control the interferometer from this office building. And I want to show you the brief history of the Kagawa sensitivity improvement. We finished the installation of the interferometer in the spring of 2019, last year, so after nine years of work. Then in August last year, we were able to operate the interferometer. That means we were able to observe the interference light and the sensitivity at the time is shown this green curve. Then we had several improvement until March this year. So at the March this year, we achieved this level. And this is the design sensitivity. So unfortunately, we are still not so close to the design sensitivity. But, well, certainly we improved. For example, if we look at the USA's 300 Hertz range, then within this, how many months? So actually more than half a year, we improved the sensitivity by four dozen magnitude. So at the time, we started the operation. Then due to COVID-19, no one was able to come to the site. And the number of people in the site was so limited, we stopped the operation, 24 hour operation a day, in two weeks, so that is the status. Since then, we are stopping the operation. And well, of course, the same is happening in other projects, U.S. and Europe. All these are stopping the operation. And therefore, we have been discussing with our U.S. and European colleagues what we should do next. And essentially, we have been deciding that we'll have the joint observation in 2022. We do not know the months, but 2022 is the target. So we'll join the observation. And we hope that at that time, we further improve the sensitivity and we achieve the reason of a good sensitivity. By the way, I think I didn't mention why we are going to have the joint observation with these interferometers. Well, we believe that the scientific output will be maximized by the global network. For example, a very important information from the global gravitational wave network is the directional information. From any single interferometer, we have no information about the arrival direction of the gravitational wave. If you have multiple interferometers, then by observing the time difference of the arrived signal, you can estimate the arrival direction of the gravitational waves. But if the detectors are only in United States and Europe, then the accuracy could be something like that. So depending on the source, so in some cases already with this configuration, the accuracy of the arrival direction determination is good, but in some cases, the arrival direction is poor. But if we include Kagura, then Kagura is far from these two other detectors, then we can substantially improve the determination of the arrival direction. And that way, we'd like to contribute to the gravitational wave astronomy. And finally, so far I separately discussed neutrino physics and gravitational waves, but we are not completely independent. Say, suppose a supernova explodes at the center of the Milky Way, for example, then we should observe a lot of neutrino events in these neutrino detectors. In addition, we should have important data from gravitational waves. And by combining these two data, we truly understand the mechanism of the supernova explosion. And of course, the other information such as optical observation or simulations are very important. Okay, so that way, neutrino and gravitational waves are not independent. Okay, basically that all, neutrinos and gravitational waves are new eyes and ears to study the universe. That's all, thank you very much for your attention.


Wait, what's up, Denipeds? I can't wait to show you my new ultra-moist jeans. Oh, yeah! These are the wettest jeans in the game right now. These bad boys are soaked. They stay wet for two to three weeks, and then you dunk them in any creek or river to rehydrate. I spent $400 on these, and most of that is actually chipping because the water is so heavy. Fits great!


Hello, what's your name? Grace, I'm Joey so we've got a sign here yes and do you disagree with it? I it was wait change your change my mind about eating meat for vegan. It says if you're not vegan you support animal abuse change my mind do you agree that if you're not vegan you support animal abuse? I'm pescatarian okay or I call myself pescatarian. What's a pescatarian? A pescatarian is someone who does not eat meat like cows or pigs so no bacon and but they're eat sea animals okay so I eat like fish crabs lobster clams oyster yeah and what about dairy cheese and eggs? I will have eggs and I do have milk with cereal okay I don't eat a lot of milk I mean I don't drink a lot of milk. You don't drink a lot of milk? That's fine, don't be nervous. That's cool I just I just wanted to get an outline of what you think about so veganism encompasses all of these industries for a reason so you don't think that eating fish for this animal abuse or support animal abuse? I do not support animal abuse at all. I have like a dog. I don't support animal abuse. I think a lot of people are thinking about that part. I don't support it but I would say like if a fish you know a fish comes with its life. Do you think fish live their life to the end and then they're dragged out of the ocean and killed you? I think a lot of people will fish and then eat the fish for people to still live in. So if you've got alternatives do you think it's moral to drag fish out the ocean and kill them for food? I think if after they you know live their lives what do you mean by that statement live their lives what do you mean? So a fish could be swimming and when it dies then I see why not eat it. So you're saying if a fish died of natural causes it's like I don't I don't think that's animal abuse if a fish died of natural causes by the way yeah yeah I think that would be I think that'd be fine and then eating it. Okay is that what you do? Do you find dead crabs and that lived a happy life and that died naturally? No but I think that's the way it should go because the industry is like really not great. I've seen videos on one sec can we just keep this on the topic here? Sure because I'm saying if you're not vegan you support animal abuse. I'm not trying to look for a scenario where eating an animal that's already dead is okay. I want to know if you're not vegan in today's society here in the UK when you have alternatives around you know what vegan alternatives are and you choose to support the industries that kill animals or exploit animals do you support animal abuse? I do not support animal abuse no I don't. Explain how that's true. How don't you support it if you pay for them to be killed? That's a really good point. Yeah no I don't have it really you're right about that. Because animals obviously killed on your behalf if you want to consume them. If I go to a store and buy you know salmon or crabs or whatever. You're funding the demand. Right yeah I totally no I agree with everything you're saying and I would be vegan I just it's really hard for me to get protein like in ways I think like I get really hungry. You know I thought about the same thing so you're not the only one when I first. Right because you're vegan right? Yeah yeah yeah so where do you think protein originally comes from?  They might eat a lot of animals in the ocean eat each other but they might see they do eat each other. What about land animals where do you think they get their protein from? I think well eating grass and food. Like grains and things like that. I'm not big until I'm full. That's okay. Do you think you can get protein by eating plants that's what I would just ask you. Yeah yeah no yes you can get vitamins and protein from plants I know that. Okay so do you think there's any justification to choose animal products over vegan products? Like what is the justified right like how do you justify that when you have alternatives to go I want to pay for fish to be killed dragged out the ocean suffocate stabbed gutted all of that when you have an alternative made of beans or tofu or grains. Well if there was an alternative I would eat it instead of meat. Is there an alternative? I don't know enough about it to know if there is. I'm sure there like I know you can get protein from like nuts and beans and spinach as it right? So all nine essential amino acids which make up protein are found in plants originally. So even lettuce has amino acids. All plants contain protein in varying levels. Then I would eat that yeah I do eat that. I do eat that with some seafood. Would you be worried about your health if you chose plant based eating? Not if I was full and knew I had enough protein going into my system when I was like healthy. My doctor said I was like healthy. That's interesting. So these industries that exploit animals you agree that by virtue of supply and demand when you pay for products that directly exploit and kill animals you're supporting animal abuse you agree with that? I think that would include that yes. Because I know in your heart you might not. Right and a lot of people probably deny it like what they think about it and be like yes but deny it themselves. Because this stirs up a little bit of like a conscience because in your heart you're against animal abuse but in your actions. You're like supporting it even if you don't intend to yeah. So I use this analogy like I'm against domestic violence but I beat my wife every day. Does that make logical sense? Horrible horrible. Does that sound consistent? That makes sense and that sounds horrible when you like hear that yeah.  I don't think that's right no. And not in a survival situation either because we're not in a survival situation here where we have to do some crazy stuff hey. Yeah that's all terrible stuff. So would you agree that like in today's society where there's a bunch of alternatives you can get protein obviously it's pretty established now that you can get all your nutrition on a well planned vegan diet. So do you think there's any justification for not choosing vegan options? I think that if you are a meat eater and you didn't get it from like if we I think part of the issue is like the industry like all these chickens are getting put into like farm. Maserita? Yeah. Have you heard of a maserita? Let's see if we can find it. Yeah I'm pretty sure I have but I don't believe that killing animals just for us to eat when they're still alive is right. I think like a chicken should be able to you know live its life and then at the end when it died instead of it going to waste I guess or going back into the earth.    Have you had a pet before? Yeah yeah I have a dog.  Just wondering. Curious. I personally wouldn't know. Why is that? Because I don't really eat dog.  This is a dairy cow. She's gone to the slaughterhouse because she can't produce milk anymore. This is her daughter. She's being executed for someone's burger but she comes from the dairy industry so 50% of the beef in this country comes from the dairy industry. So if you're eating dairy this is what we're supporting. I don't think that's right. I think that an animal should have it's life because an animal is an animal and I think it should have it's life.  I don't think that's right and I don't support that at all. But you generally do support it though. I support what? I mean you don't support it in your heart but I'm saying in your actions do you support it? You know we're talking about supply and demand. So if you're not vegan you support it. This is what I'm trying to say. You might not support it here but here. But like when you look at your plate then you're supported. It's a dead body or it's cheese or it's a dead fish. So these industries only exist because of the public. This is the point I'm trying to make. And that's what I'm saying. I don't think it's right. I don't think that's right that they're getting all raised to just be killed and treated like that. Do you think animals have moral value and deserve the right to live their own life without being used or exploited as a product?  I don't eat them myself. Who taught you that dead animals are food? I think it's just in our culture kind of. And it's in a lot of cultures you know. When you're little your parents serve you a plate of something. It's like this is food. This is what we're having for dinner tonight. They don't show you this do they? No. They probably haven't seen it themselves. They probably haven't. A lot of I think part of the reason why you get served that too is people don't not everyone knows this goes on and I think that's not right. Do you think they might intuitively know something's up but they just don't want to face it? Maybe. Maybe. Or some people just simply grew up on that for generations. Like their parents taught them that and their parents taught them that. And they just kind of continued on with tradition without giving it much thought. No one really gives a second thought about picking up a pack of meat in a grocery store. Or I shouldn't say no one because there are people in this world who do. But I don't believe many people do pick up a package of meat and have a second thought about it being like hmm where was this made? How was it like? When you see fish get dragged out of the ocean by their face they're swimming peacefully through the ocean. They get dragged out by their face and stabbed in the throat and gutted and things like that. That whole process you wouldn't be connected to when you purchase it in the supermarket. Exactly. You're just like oh food I'm hungry and you know I have a family I gotta feed. You know oh this works. And so you pick it up and you buy it without thinking like huh what happened to the fish or what happened to the cow? So the dairy cow or the hens that get minced up alive? Exactly. I don't need any of that anyways. The egg industry so the hens don't get minced up alive. So the male baby chicks will get minced up alive because they don't produce eggs. The hens will be exploited for their eggs and then killed for chicken. So that's why vegans don't consume eggs because they cause the same problem. You sound like a very honest person. You sound honest like you're not trying to escape from the issue here. No because it's an issue that's very real.  I don't think that. Do you think that I think that? No I don't think so at all. I understand what's going on. It's an issue that's all around the world that's happening. And I genuinely believe that a lot of people don't give a second thought about a hamburger or anything. Well I ate meat for 26 years. I used all animal products. I didn't know about the industry but once I did I couldn't live with that hypocrisy in my heart. I had to align what I did with what I felt and what I believed. Because I believed I wasn't an animal abuser. But my actions were completely contradictory to that. Which is why I used a domestic violence analogy. And it's a good analogy. I agree with that. It doesn't make sense to me to have a rape free Monday. It's just like be anti-rape.  Be anti-racist. If you're against animal abuse your actions have to align with that. Yeah I agree with that. I remember when I was younger I did actually eat cow and pig. I ate all of that. I stopped eating it personally because I didn't like the taste of most meats. And I'm like why am I eating this if I don't even like it. So that's how I first stopped. But I mean these points are really good points too. And I did watch in my classes, I remember in 9th grade I think. My science teacher showed us a video of how the farms were. And how they were treating animals.  Because that's horrendous what happened. Do you think you would think twice next time you go to purchase animal products? Oh yeah. I do try and be conscious. But I'm like with what I'm purchasing. What if I gave you like a little challenge to do and it's free on Facebook. It's called a vegan challenge.  But this is 22 days where they'll sort of guide you. And you can do it like sort of as a foot in the door and go move on from there. Then you know what to eat and you know these questions that you have. Because you might be concerned about protein which is not a nutrient of concern. I don't have enough calories. But yeah this is a really good these are some more resources at the environment in health.  And then go from there. I can try yeah that's a pretty that's an interesting challenge. I feel like that's like scarier. But then once you're in the challenge you know I got this isn't so bad. What's scary about letting go of the foods that you're used to. Maybe what I'm saying for people in general I think it'd be like a scary challenge. For me personally it's just like getting making sure I have enough nutrients. I'm being healthy and my body is getting what it needs you know the vitamins and protein and all that. It's scary because like you eat all these products without really thinking twice about it. And so then to adapt your diet but also be conscious of your health and making sure you have everything. I think it's scary because of that. Like the adapting and trying to make sure you have everything that your body needs that's what I think. There's a fantastic research source it's called nutritionfacts.org and they're research scientists and they pull up the best available evidence on plant-based eating. And there was a big peer-reviewed statement that the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics brought out. And they said that vegan diet can be healthy for all stages of life. Pregnancy, infancy, athletes, the elderly and it's backed by about 117 studies. So you could look up that and then you get the backing of such a large group of nutrition experts. There's about 100,000 of them and it's backed by the NHS as well. As long as it's well balanced and you're getting your B12 and you're making sure that you're eating a balanced array of different foods.  I think that's a good challenge. That's why the vegan challenge they'll help you. They've got guidance on there for you. Right, right. I guess I'm like... Don't lose the table. I know. Everything just blows off. It's like, I think it would be easier for me just because I'm halfway there already anyways. I think you're actually all the way there here. But just not in your day-to-day actions. Right, right. Cause like I eat like fish and other seafood. And if I had a fish here and I dragged them out the tank and started to stab the fish, you'd probably tell me to stop. I wouldn't want you to do that. Cause you know fish feel pain and they suffer and... Yeah, yeah. They're different to us but they have a desire to live their lives. I mean just this morning, I'm not even lying. Just this morning me and my little sister were taking the trash out and I saw like this half, like the bird was injured. It was one of those pigeons. It looked like something attacked the pigeon. I felt so bad. So you hate seeing animals being harmed. You would hate that. Cause it's like... They feel pain. They feel like suffering and it's not great seeing an animal suffer. I mean it's not great seeing a person suffer and never mind an animal. So whenever you pay for that fish, you're causing that fish's suffering. So if it was in your face, you would like... If you've seen that fish in your face suffering, you wouldn't... I don't want to pay for that. You'd go for the vegan option, wouldn't you? What do you mean? Like if you've seen the fish, whenever you paid for fish, if you've seen their suffering in your face, you would go for the vegan option. What's the vegan option? Are you saying like a synthetic fish or something? You could get some tofu fish or you could get some beans or some fruit and potatoes and there's many different alternatives now made out of different plant products that mimic the taste. I would go for that if I saw like a fish literally getting tossed out of a water, killed and then given to me. I'd be like, nope.  I'll have like an Italian pasta dish, veggies and pasta. Wait, that's not even Italian. It is pasta Italian. Yeah, that's fine what you put on there. But it was really lovely to talk to you. You sound like you're all the way there, just not in your actions. So you'd say, but before we finish that, you agree with this statement? Do you still disagree with it? No, no, no. If you're not vegan, you support animal abuse. That's really tough. I wouldn't want to say that, but most people don't let the animals live to the end of their lives before killing them. I mean, before eating them, not killing them. They would get killed first before they got eaten. Sorry, I'm not making this. So if you're not vegan, you would support what happens to animals for your food and products. You don't want to agree with it because if you agree with it, then you'd have to align yourself with that. Because you're kind of calling yourself an animal abuser if you agree with it. I'm not really worried about myself. I'm just thinking of all the other people. Well, I want to only know about you. Oh, me personally. Like what you think of the statement. Not what other people think, but I want to know what you think of it. Do you think it's animal abuse to not be vegan? Do you think you support the industries that abuse animals if you're not vegan? I think you're supporting the industries, yes. Even if you don't mean to. But what about the people that, oh, I don't, that's a really tough question. I don't know because, yeah, personally, I don't support like, you know, I guess I do support it with the fish and seafood when I have it, but... So you would say that, you know... It's such a tough question. Well, I can leave you with the thought. Maybe you can ask yourself that question later on and see if it sinks in a little more. Maybe do a little bit of research. You know, watch Cal Spiracy, watch Land of Hope and Glory, see those industries and see what you think. Really nice to talk to you. He's talking to you. Thank you. Thank you. So I guess we're going to cut that there, but no one's really done a very good job at changing my mind. So I think we'll continue to do this and see if anyone can change my mind. You can try a vegan challenge, alright? How's that sound? How do you become a vegan? What do you eat? What do you eat? So most people eat vegan food anyway. So pasta, rice, bread, potatoes, starches, anything that comes from an animal, though, like cheese and milk and yogurt, find an alternative for. Find a vegan yogurt, find a vegan cheese. It's a vegan milk. Yeah, soy milk, grass milk, almond milk. There's about 13. Soy milk's still vegan. Yeah, yeah. It doesn't come from an animal? So I'm already part vegan anyway, because I do eat pasta a lot. Okay, yeah, so your diet is, but veganism is like, it's like a belief. Okay? But I do believe that I will soon not be killed. Yeah, you do. But your actions might still purchase the products that hurt them. That's why when you align, when you put in align your belief and your action, that's when you're a vegan. And I feel like I'm nearly a vegan because I do... Yeah, I think so too. I think in your heart you are. And then when you know what products from the supermarket are vegan. So all fruits and vegetables, all beans, all rice, all bread, all of those, anything comes from a plant. But when you see cheese from a cow, get the vegan cheese, okay? Made from coconuts or nuts. When you see eggs, they're not vegan. Use tofu makes scrambled tofu. When you see dairy products, ice cream, get the vegan version. And most people at the supermarket, that work there will tell you where the vegan options are in that supermarket. As long as it didn't come from an animal, it's vegan. And then you can start thinking about later on, clothing, skin, animal skin, they're killed for their clothes, their leather, their wool, feathers, all of these other areas they're tested on for products. They're used and exploited in different areas of our lives. So it's good to start to be conscious if things are coming from an animal or if they came from plants. I definitely support, I definitely think people should think about them, think about them in the future because I think that killing a dog or something, it's important. So I think people should think about what they eat or what they do. 100% agree.  No. That's amazing that you feel that way, dude. And I hope this is the beginning of a vegan journey for you.


Everybody for us to your rip in a box for Nicholas as Nick's got a 2022 immaculate baseball first off the line photo box Good luck Nicholas. Let's see J rod or cruise or wit or Dela Cruz Ellie Dela Cruz, maybe Nice prospects in Immaculate this year Immaculate total. Yeah, we should have clearly in stock check after this should have plenty though All right, here we go pink first off the line patch card Alex Bregman 10 out of 10 That's today's date actually there you go Damon. You got 16 Hit my wife with the old are you today's date cuz you're a 10 out of 10 One me some good points, you know cubs bat relic Ryan Sandberg 50 of 99 God pink RPA seven of eight first off the line on hell Zerpa with a What is that patch like is that a minor league patch maybe Royals, no, I don't know that's a really nice patch though Cool Vicki Redemption is Walker Bueller clearly Immaculate signatures red The Dodgers had Walker, I'd probably say they're gonna win it outright Should but well, I don't know It's Walker Bueller Got Jake McCarthy RPA 18 out of 30 a four-color d-backs patch Neeks, what's up? I'm neaks. It'd be all-star game. Give me something Quite sure what it'd be. Yeah, and nice hit here signatures. This would be a prospect card right now Bryson Stocks 82 out of 99 you look those those glasses The guy could be inside the Sun and it wouldn't hurt his eyes Nice Bryson Stott's That will do it Appreciate you Nicholas get those right out to you


Gentlemen I found something weird once again if you've already seen the video where I put Michael picket wide receiver you would know that I'm just on a weird tangent of looking for some bizarre shit right now and mad and I found some new bizarre stuff And I think this is going to be hilarious and I think it's gonna work really well not to mention currently I'm in my conference championship, so I really am praying this works I have literally no idea when this ability was put in the game I don't know how this slipped under the radar, but I recently saw this it's like a fist holding a trophy It's called honorary linemen. It is where wide receivers get an impact block win versus DB's every single time Imagine if this was around during the days of RPO peaks on bubble tell me I wouldn't have Honestly what I would have done I can't say in this video because I would be persecuted to the fullest extent I would spend the rest of my life in prison It would be a felony what I would have done if wide receivers could have gotten this back in the days of RPO peak So bubble now I'm still gonna try RPO peaks on bubble with this maybe it'll work with this I doubt it, but maybe either way there's not a ton of wide receivers you get it You need a physical wide receiver with at least 60 impact box So right now that's Chase Claypool the one guy from tiktok and Larry Fitzgerald I think there's a few more but that's who I'm running I like those three additionally if everything goes to shit. I'm gonna run DK Metcalf with this new ability Which is super funny. It's called backlash more tackler fatigue. I'm not considered tackles I don't really know how good this will be. I just think yeah, it looks really funny. I like how it looks You know EA. I don't know why but it reminds me the logos from like cod zombies like black ops one and black ops two zombies I don't know why also I could see this being really good if you kept like bullying one linebacker and got them really Fatigued and then ran like a slant on that linebacker in man coverage kind of a niche Scenario, but if you got a linebacker gas and then threw on him in man coverage, you'd probably burn it I don't know that's just our backup plan because I am in the conference championship Either way, my goal is to throw screen passes to run stretch to run tosses and have my wide receivers Absolutely open up the fattest lane humanly possible. I think it's gonna work granted I've never used this ability So if this totally flops just know that no matter what the title of this video is these new abilities are the meta even if they're totally Just kidding, you know what I'm gonna make them the meta. I'm gonna make them the meta I'm not I wouldn't clickbait you guys like that. I wouldn't hold you out that bad without further ado We are in the playoffs we nice in and owed the last guy so hopefully we'll continue with that same luck Let's go get this shimony boys. We got a night for overall squad. We're ready to do this Also, I am so proud to partner with current to show you guys the future of banking I just have explained a little more, but please just look how beautiful this card is You should be intrigued already to put it most simply current is a mobile bank with a visa debit card But on top of that they have some awesome benefits I hate to be your father here But I think it's really important that you guys take financial responsibility early on It'll be one of the smartest things to do in the future and current is gonna help you get there Even have accounts for teens under the age of 18, which is awesome. So current's gonna function as a real bank account There's no hidden fees. There's no minimum balance requirement I think the absolute coolest feature though is getting paid two days earlier. Let's make a little scenario here starting on Monday You pretty much already know how much money you're gonna make going into Friday But you won't get your paycheck till Friday What current can do is actually get you paid up to two days earlier than your paycheck arrives It takes like two minutes to sign up and the card ships for free awesome card highly highly recommend And as always I've got a link for you in the top of the description so you can just click that I'll take it right to it makes the whole thing super easy current I want to thank you for sponsoring this video.  I'm not gonna lie, but if this is the new meta It won't matter first in ten it looks like he's going to run play. Let's fill the gap fill the gap beauty Wow, he's running hot rock master rich Ganon this guy knows Madden. Oh You're running the ball again. Are we gonna get a stop here early? Damn. Is this another NFC championship? Oh my god, it's his NFC championship. We really back-to-back the NFC championship. All right boys 39 We need a big big clamp here. What are you doing? What are you doing bro? You have a bro? I don't this how this happens What would be bad is if he figures out what I'm doing. That's when this is not gonna work All I need is Chase Claypool To get out there. It's Charles Woodson over there. Let me see how this works throw that block I mean it was a decent block, but that wasn't anything special Larry Fitz You better lay this fucker out like that's the whole point of it honorary lineman impact block wins versus DB It doesn't mean always maybe she means sometimes It's me What's the point of the ability am I reading it wrong? Am I doing something wrong here? I've been completely in an utterly scam. I'm gonna make them the meta Okay, so over top of Larry Fitz right now Rod Woods and Charles Woods in both DB's 100% DB's they should get flattened, right? Okay, obviously those runs aren't getting out there anyway, but I've literally been scared. I've been scared All right, oh chose sinko is just gonna put this right on the shmoney great kick We take the thrill lead in the fantasy championship and I've been completely scared. Well, I shouldn't be surprised by this I am defense is on clamp time right now though. Let's see if he keeps running It looks like he wants to run the ball. Yeah, he did he wants to establish the run game so bad I don't know man. This is looking like Derek Henry versus the Ravens right now. I'm talking the second time not the first time. He's running it again That's a run. Oh Play action. Oh, I read it wrong still got the hit stick though. Derek Henry is tired. The subs are in What are you looking for? Oh a little slip screen. I like that Dude Jamal I'm seven a day third and six big time stop. You're not running inside zone. There's no way you're running inside zone Okay, that's what I thought right here right here right here do it That's a drop. Oh my god. That was a weird animation Now the problem we had with running pixel bubble for was like the juju smith shooter would just run to the safety completely ignore his Responsibility, let's see how this lines up right here Okay, so yeah What yeah, you're your response to a play that's really good is to completely break it like that makes no football sense You block the person in front of you. Yeah, if I'm being honest. I'm mad about it. I'm gonna make him a mad I wouldn't hold you out that bad. He's pressed up now.  I have six completely wasted abilities on the field right now I'm in physical pain All right, Dalvin cooks gonna make a big catch here for the name.  He is a d-line user, but I think we'll I think we'll bamboozle him. Yeah bamboozle Whoo Dalvin, I'm so sorry now. I just want to put Metcalf in look at this Metcalf route So I motioned his post over to the other side of the field now. He's got this super deep deep corner I feel like that could be nasty It's not I lied Kettle over the middle. It's just it's always so good. All right, we're gonna go power Wait a second. Okay, so my wide receivers are blocking on this to maith Baker may feel this blocking on the left side of the field I don't know why but I do get some wide receiver blockers here He falls early. He gets juked. We made negative play into positive play. I'm happy about that He's gonna run commit again, but this is a counter. Maybe run commit left side. He shifted left He read commit. Oh He recommend everybody left.  Let's go. All right Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Oh, it's Titans playbook. I don't have any good fakes That was actually the worst thing about the Titans playbook, bro The fakes are doo-doo.   That's impressive I don't know whose credit card this guy used to buy this team, but this guy is bad All right first in 10, I do not want to get dusted over the top here Yeah, that's fine because that clock is chewing my friend blitz Don't get out of bounds don't get out of bounds. Let's go. I literally am running a whole team of brand new abilities I'm so depressed, bro bad You will never get out of the box man. Just enjoy the box love the box cuz you're in it You're in it for life. I see what you see. Oh My god, I knew he was doing that.   What you want is inside stuff and he doesn't have it Oh, I didn't even activate backlash the only ability I could have even tried out for any use I didn't even activate It doesn't really wow. Yeah, it doesn't really matter. Metcalfe super good anyway same exact blitz Except this time Metcalfe is gonna get through that Maybe I'll give it to chase clip. Oh, it's not Doesn't matter though. I kept still open. Oh, he's so fast He's so good. I don't need backlash.    If only I had backlash I would have fatigued those corners and I would have gotten that sooner. Can Claypool burn his man Is Claypool gonna be open here?  It is an endpoint game. I can't go for the two here Oh, is it just a kicker run it in damn. Otrosinkos got them wheels though.   I've done nothing wrong ever. Let's give another wildcat Need I remind you that this is this man's NFC championship you can see it kind of on the right side of your screen there We'll go we'll go right across it right here Here we go Larry Fitz wide receiver screen juju's gonna toss the greatest block of all time What I do? I would too bro. I would too just go just go. How did I do that? That was a pick six Good pot. You deserve to leave. What is going?  I got jubated by EA dude.  No, no how to run it. It's bad All right boys. I somehow just advanced to the conference championship off of that game and the Michael Vick at wide receiver game I wish Willemont was this easy. Okay, um, oh Don't make the same mistakes. I do man. Just don't I love you boys. Thank you for watching guys I'll see you in the next video Peace out