Rečno, da smo za njega vidim, in puno this will be a relatively speculative talk, ... lighter if this is was how it was intended by organisers, ... but probably would be more conjectures than new results in particular. in na obstavne prvne analizie v bojvom moženjem, ne obstavne. Oga nekaj je však drugi počut. V moženjem prejv, da v se zelo pravno začeli, oče, tako, džegaj, no, počutujem, ko smo bojvom na obstavne prvne prvne prvne prvne. Stajem s prvne prvne prvne. Vesme se, da potrebeno. Uklidnje konceler, zelo obstavne domenje in plorisa parmonic function that vanishes on the boundary, when whose monjam pair is given by some density, I mean, essentially equivalent, you can think of u at least for now as smooth. So, the trivial estimate is this. So this is immediately from comparison principle, just comparing this u with the modulus of z square. Now, in fact, this is quite related to the energy density in the control of the yaw. So this is one of the proofs, gives you first by, you know, quite elementary way a localization to the Euclidean setting. And then you have to get a certain estimate. And what you need really is almost something like that with a difference that you need the constant, I mean, you need the constant to be better, slightly. So, somehow, to ensure that it goes to zero, as volume goes to zero, that's kind of crucial, you cannot just rely on the diameter. And I guess this, when I know this, I haven't been very active as you know for the last few years, but I noticed that actually this kind of, this estimate has been used in various situations. Now, this that you can have volume going, I mean that you have the dependence on volume, follows in particular from the definitely non-trivial, like the first one was trivial, but this is non-trivial local estimate of this kind. So, now you have the dependence on the diameter still, but if you use held or continue or whatever, as you obviously see that you can get in the first estimate, this dependence on the volume, provided that diameter is under control. So, now I have my first conjecture, is that you should have something like that without any control, I mean without caring about diameter. Well, it has to be, if u is zero on the boundary, it has to be like hyperconvex, but so equivalent to u, you can say strongly superconvex bounded. It is not different because by approximation, so if u can get 2, 4, f, n is 1. Oh, exactly, very good question, but because, you see, you actually believe that u came, it was a very good question. But, you know, in fact, and this is not so completely trivial and I have realized recently that people, even when they do n equa 1, often miss the following result, which reduces this thing to a radius method. So, this is, I think it is quite often overlooked. So, this result by Valenti from the 70s, well, generally for Laplacian, which says that if you, well, you have this Dirichard problem and you symmetrize the right-hand side as a Schwarz symmetrization, right? And then the solve corresponding problem in the symmetrize domain. Symmetrize domain, meaning ball, with the same volume, centered at the origin, and functions having, you know, whose sub-level, super-level set in this case are positive, they have the same volume. So, then this v is regularly symmetric, obviously, and the result is that it has to be below symmetrization of u star. So, in fact, not only this original estimate with L infinity norm, but if you want to have any estimate for, you know, LP norm of F, since symmetrization preserves LP norms and, in fact, other norms, to other, really, so it could be even useful for the openness conjecture, well, okay, but let's not talk about that. This result reduces all these kind of estimates to radially symmetric functions, and then it's very simple. You can get, I mean, for L infinity norms, this specific estimate, and, in fact, for, right, so, and then, okay, to get this precise, so, now domain has no restriction, it doesn't have to be, because talenti reduces this in the case of radially symmetric functions because the L infinity norm of u is bounded by the L infinity norm of v, and then for radially symmetric functions, well, yeah, you just compare it with, you know, modulo z square over r square in the bowl, r is the bowl of omega star, and you have to remember that the volume is v r square, so you get an estimate in terms of r, so therefore, there's nothing about f. Nothing about f? Why? There is an f. The f's, the L infinity norm of f star is the same as the L infinity norm of f. In, in fact, the Lp norm of f is the same. So, okay, talenti, okay, maybe I can write it down here. The main point with talenti is that the p norm of f star is always the same as this is just the property of asymmetrization, whereas the infinity norm of u is actually my talenti that's the the other way around. No, that's the way. Yeah, this way. So, so, so you do it for v, so you do, you know, the estimate for v, but then you have equality on the right hand side, so that's why it reduces omega star. But omega star is yeah, omega star the thing is that the volume of omega star is p r squared. So, no, they are in both defined in the whole. So, in fact, yeah, the, I've been thinking a lot about the symmetrization problem for the complex mojampere which now, in fact, I've resulted in writing down that in such a generality it cannot fold for the complex mojampere. There are results that I will mention for the real mojampere by talenti, again, in dimension two and so in higher dimensions. They are not completely satisfactory to my purposes but I will show you. Yeah, but the general, I have a, again, general conjecture. So, say, in Kowoji's local LP estimate the constant should be really determined by radially symmetric function. So, it's kind of a simple to give a Kowoji estimate for radially symmetric function. It's maybe harder to write down those constants in general conjecture despite the fact that there cannot be like a similar analogous result for the symmetrization. It's still, I believe, that the constant should be somehow determined by radially symmetric functions. Well, OK. So, that's dimension one and now here and that's essentially the Alexander of Backelman-Pucci estimate which boils down to the similar problem for convex functions. So, bounded convex domain zero on the boundary convex and then so I have the really the L1 norm on the right-hand side because, OK, there you don't have to care about higher norm because it's already true for a one norm which it is not for in the complex case. So, you have this general estimate and it's known that it depends on the diameter. It's just the comparison with the ball. Right, so if you that's also how to improve this dependence on the domain. Now, there is this symmetrization result for the Mohsen pair but in so but the problem is that the right-hand side is symmetrized, the F is still symmetrized in respect to the leg measure but the function in respect to the different measure namely precisely the square mass integral w and minus one which is which is multi-volume of this w and minus one of omega is multi-volume of you take omega and minus one times unit of ones. But, you know is a parametric inequality this is actually bigger than in general than the volume. So, it's not yet like optimal. What is the denominator? What is the denominator? Omega n is the volume of the unit of one. Okay. So, all right. I will have omega n later on as the future documentation. Okay. So, well, the results I can prove that in nevertheless despite this and I also this kind of counter example for symmetrization is really symmetrized exactly the same way for the real one. But despite that you still have the result for for which is alexander kerman Pucci estimat so maybe let me quickly prove it because it turns out it has a relationship Okay. So, what I do okay. I can assume the origin is in belongs to the domain of u is a plane and is equal to minus one and here zero on the boundary I have this minimum of course it doesn't have to be symmetric and what I do I take this function which agrees here on the minimum and it's defined along line segments connecting to the boundary and zero on the boundary. Right. So, this is this v that is like that and then in fact this is the domination principle essentially the total mass of this still below has to be bigger than the total mass of the v which means really the estimated reduce to only this cone functions right? That's the origin this is the origin it's inside this is where the minimum is attained this is the origin and its value is minus one but zero is value zero on the boundary Right. So, the key observation is that the monjam pair of this this is the volume of the gradient image is really the volume the gradient image is the dual of omega that's the that's the thing and now yeah so that's the optimal constant in this ABM really is one over the infimum of all dual with respect to points inside the domain and you know so if you want to estimate this from above means you also estimate this from below which is you know the Burgan Milman in equality and as Vlasis was talking about but I needed for for non-necessarily symmetric domain it's not an issue really and so Maastron Tomis Rubinstein proved recently that you can take proved that you can have this inequality for this particular constant although I should also mention that that you know if you don't care I mean if you don't really care about dimension it's maybe there is a you know simpler simpler argument so by by Jones theorem really you can get some constant much worse but still depending on the on the on the on the on the dimension ok and then one more remark so there is this the the what is estimate for true was proved earlier by Cheng and Yao well I should that was really yeah in the written version that appeared in the Bedford survey paper and there was also kind of worked out by SEGRA so that this really I didn't mention so alexander bakerman putchi also also that's that's the usefulness or in but but it reduces to the convex case so if you have a non-convex function you take the envelope the lower envelope of convex functions and you only have so you only have to compute the mojampare this set of contact to the initial one so that is way of reducing so you can also use it for parmony functions this way and then you use this point wise inequality between real and complex mojampare equations and they both easily give you the kowođe estimate for p which is probably the simplest way of proving this way the uniform estimate in the kalabialo theorem just that you at least and this also gives you the global kowođe estimate on compact-color manifold for any p bigger than 2 was this over them separate in yaw? that's it? yeah, that's it it's also the kowođe estimate for p is due to general yaw but they didn't invite no, they didn't invite for the global right because for the global you need a streak of localization okay so that's and now the next two slides will be kind of side remarks so first is and is using this method you can prove a certain isoparametric inequality so let and this uses this method that kind of typical for those in this symmetrization result so again now assume our domain is smooth strongly convex and v is as before so it's you know this cone function a final long line segments so we know that the volume of the dual is equal to the možan pair but you can integrate by parts so really now since this is smooth near the boundary this integral is really equal to the boundary integral and hn minus one is precisely the Gauss curvature of the boundary times the modules or the gradient of v to the n and now you do you apply helder estimate so you can by helder inequality you can have this lower bound in fact the numerator is constant depending only on the dimension for the context case and for the denominator there is this general formula for any v not just ours due to rightly how this behaves under differentiation so and now you get hn minus two so if you differentiate this you know this kind of evolution of hyper surfaces is the Gauss curvature and hn minus two is instantimetric in order of one I think so the question of the you have hn minus the Gauss curvature is the product hn minus two is the next one of degree n minus two I guess I will do some differential geometry that some curvature tensors I haven't really studied the order of v d is not behind smooth no, I am not no, I think it should happen I mean this at least without this was smooth once but maybe there are some general differences this v is smooth because this v because our domain now we assumed as a smooth boundary so away from the origin it is smooth right it is essentially after constant the Minkowski functional right but our v is very special because really it is the sub levels that are proportional to omega so this way to the right hand side really you can easily compute what it is so this way you really get this parametric inequality because there is equality just for both I was thinking oh I found something new in convex but of course I proved something that was known before and 75 of course different methods but ok, the result is actually old this hn-2 it wasn't clear what it meant if it was not on the boundary yeah so it's really a boundary motion in fact, yeah I can tell you yeah I tried a lot of these approaches in the complex case as you know in the levy curvature and so on and so on and so on so so so so so so so so so so and so on maybe it's actually an interesting thing to prove counterpart of Reilly formula for complex complex stuff so levy levy curvature and so on ok and the other the Census whose like upside remark oh poslust this is getting late so I try to be quickly Tako tudi na 20 ročih, vzgleda je zelo čo je tudi tako zeno, neτ ta monžan presama in tudi, nekaj tudi modelne čl ata vzgleda vzgleda vzgleda. Pravno, je niče in vzgleda je, da tudi početni提redno član ko tvoje boje pojeb in Poel. Tukaj drugič je didzve vzgleda nekaj nekaj simetir,除 toga z ovener. Danes.. Tukaj, da te začeliš, da je to zelo ampak konveks, da je ni objez, pa to je na zelo na diagonal, vzelačno, za nozelnje domene in vse. Tukaj, da se bo, in zelo, da kaj smo pričeli, da je to što so skupnili za volumne delje. Tako je, da je to, da je ampak konveks, minimu v tudi, da je tudi predstavljena. Potenšelj nekaj, da je to nekaj zelo. Zato sem vsega, da je kovajski Tessier in Aleksandr Aleksandro Fenšel. Kaj je tukaj? Tukaj. Ok. Ok. Proste, zelo sem zelo, vzelo, da je zelo, zelo, da je zelo, zelo, da je zelo, zelo, da je zelo, zelo, da je zelo, da je zelo, da je zelo, da je zelo, but this is because you can solve. And here it's not really obvious what kind of linear operator you have to use because it's probably by... Right. And let me, the last thing, let me mention that it's a funny wise that you can also have opposite inequalities. And there's this result by Urban Sagrell, global one, where you actually have the opposite inequality. Ok, but that's just the side. Ok, so that's...


Hey everyone, today we have a ton of new details about Monster Hunter Rise for Nintendo Switch, but before I get into all of these details, I gotta remind we got a couple giveaways going on once for a Nintendo Switch, a PlayStation 5, or an Xbox Series X, another is for two copies of Pikmin 3 Deluxe to enter head down to the description and figure that all out. Good luck to you guys. Also we are on the road to 100,000 subscribers and we can get 100,000 subscribers in 2020. We will have a massive 100 plus winner, $1000 plus giveaway happening this January. Alright, let's get into this. So new Monster Hunter Rise details are coming out of the woodworks because they have done a ton of interviews at various outlets. Now a lot of the information is repeated between interviews, so we're going to kind of go through the minimalist breakdowns here of a lot of this stuff. First one that I'm going to talk about is one that happened at IGN, and I'll have all these interviews linked down in the description. Here's like a little breakdown here. So Toshimoto said the team decided it would be better for the players to understand what the game is about by going with Monster Hunter Rise as the name. Toshimoto also said that they wanted to have a title that reflects what it's about rather than just a number, and they said new way of naming the games is also planned for the future. So some people were wondering, is this Monster Hunter 6? Is this another variation of 5? Reality is they're not going to really be using numbers anymore. So like Monster Hunter World, Monster Hunter Rise, kind of get used to these naming conventions. They're going to keep using them. So we might be done with numbered entries, and that might be honestly for the best. Single player progression won't affect your ability to play multiplayer quest in vice versa. Cut scenes will no longer prevent you from joining multiplayer quests with friends like in Monster Hunter World. You can skip cut scenes in single player and multiplayer. You can rewatch these cut scenes later. It does laugh if they were inspired by Breath of the Wild. They've actually been wanting to make a Monster Hunter with more freedom of movement since Monster Hunter Generations. So they had this idea before Breath of the Wild even came out. Capcom wants players to use the wire bug in between attacks to make new combos. The wire bug attacks are not customizable. Other new elements regarding actions the team can't talk about yet. There are no armor skills that affect the wire bug. The antidote icon has changed. Changes like this were being made to suit the Switch's small screen. There's no built-in voice chat. It's not compatible with Nintendo Switch's online mobile app voice chat. You could type messages and use pre-built messages, stickers, and gestures to communicate. Proler mode from Monster Hunter Generations is not in Monster Hunter Rise. Remember, Monster Hunter Rise doesn't launch on March 26, 2021. So that's what we got from IGM, but we got even more information. As an example, Monster Hunter Rise is a big deal on Switch. And it is a AAA game. It's actually been in development for four years. So this comes from an interview that Tujimoto, who is the producer of the game, did with Eurogamer and he said, it's been about four years in total. Itchines was the director of Monster Hunter Generations, which came out about four or five years ago. We did give him a bit of time off after that. It wasn't like the next day we started development, but he asked him if he could work on the next portable. At the time it hadn't been released, a Switch title. And we also had to consider what engine to use at the same time before we get started. We're using the RE engine, which at the time had not yet been released because the first title using it was Resident Evil 7. So yeah, long story short, it was a total of about four years once we got all those ducks in a row. He then went on to say that to be honest, we didn't really consider bringing Monster Hunter World to Switch because we do not treat each title as its own concept. And you can ignore the hardware you're releasing on it when you design the game. If you've got something like Nintendo Switch, which is pick up and play, you can play it anywhere. You don't necessarily want the same gameplay experience, which is designed, assuming you're sitting in front of a big TV on a sofa for four hours straight. We want to be able to design a game that you can pick up for 30 minutes on the go before bed and get something out of that experience. That really affects the gameplay design, and you can just bring that over and have it be the same. So we never really considered that when it came to Monster Hunter World. So they're kind of saying they didn't consider bringing Monster Hunter World over. I think that's a disappointing decision. I think that also is treating Switch as a one-way street.  It is a hybrid. You can play it on your TV. There are people that play Switch exclusively on TV. So it's very disappointing to see that the reason we don't have Monster Hunter World is they don't think it fits with the system that's on the go, ignoring that it's not just the system on the go. This is Capcom's fault for only viewing the Switch as a handheld. It is what it is. We can't really do anything about it. Capcom did further talk about the RE engine at the Eurogamer interview as well about why they're using the RE engine and how hard it was to use that RE engine on Switch. It said it was definitely a new challenge for us. As you mentioned, it was indeed our first time bringing the RE engine onto the Switch. So a lot of background technical engineers' work needed to be done just to achieve targeting new hardware platforms. Of course, this being an internal Capcom engine that when we did have access and the benefit of the expertise and knowledge of our engineers to hand, they worked very hard getting the engine working for us and ensuring that we would take the game content, which involves these not strictly open world per se, but extremely large maps with no loading areas between them, having those work seamlessly whilst always maintaining the graphic quality we wanted to have oriented is known for beautiful lighting and shadows. And we wanted to keep that stuff in without affecting performance and having the frame rate be something that could achieve our targets. A lot of this stuff was difficult balance to achieve, but I think that team has really pulled it targeting, hardening a comfortable 30 frames per second, most also making the game look as good as it does and pushing you know the power of the Switch as much as we can. It's been a challenging but rewarding experience. And I think the big takeaway from this is the switch here is being pushed to the maximum. Monster Under Rise is pushing every ounce of performance you can get out of Switch with their engine and with this game. So what are the big takeaways here? Well, Monster Under Rise is an incredible undertaking, purpose built for Switch, so don't expect to see this game go to other platforms. It's a game that they think is obviously going to sell extremely well. They put a AAA budget and a AAA mindset behind developing it and it basically is Monster Hunter 6. But they're not going to be using numbers anymore. They're done with the number naming. That really probably started with Monster Hunter World. When they named that world, they probably realized, hey look we're going to start doing proper names behind each game instead of doing numbers. Kind of like Legend of Zelda. They could have done Zelda 1, Zelda 2, Zelda 3, Zelda 4. They eventually stopped doing that because they called Zelda 2, Zelda 2. And then they stopped using the number moniker and just started using names. And I think that's a good way to do it. I know that can confuse some people. Oh what games come after what? Is there a timeline that connects all this together? I understand that that's the thing that some gamers worry about. Personally, I don't think it's a big deal of Monster Hunter games, but it's exciting to see all this happening. I wouldn't go to Zoom just because RE Engine is now on Switch. That means we're going to get RE Engine games, you know like the Resident Evil series. Or I think the Street Fighter is probably going to be on RE Engine. I would not presume that we're going to start getting these games on Switch magically just because the engine is now on Switch. But this also fuels the speculation behind that they wanted to target the Smooth 30 FPS. Well, there was a part of the footage that definitely didn't look like it was Smooth 30 FPS to me. And that makes me wonder if, you know, does this further the proof that, hey look, there's that Switch Pro coming and Capcom knows it. And that's where you get that Smooth 30 FPS. I don't know. It's definitely something to consider. Capcom's obviously not going to talk about it. We do know that, you know, Capcom is why there's 4 gigs of RAM on the Switch to begin with. It'd be interesting if while making this game, they're like, hey, you're working on that next hardware platform. We'd really like 8 gigs of RAM there at least. These are the kind of clock speeds we would like this or that. Because the game does look really good on the platform. The weird thing I find is it's using the RE Engine. And in using that RE Engine, it's pushing the Switch to the max. But when I go back and watch that footage, as it's struggling to hit certain FPS targets, it doesn't look like it's scaling down the resolution. Now I figured to hit these FPS targets, it would have a resolution scaler like pretty much all third party games do. Even some Nintendo games do it as well, where they switch between resolutions to maintain a stable frame rate. But even when the game was dipping in frame rate, it didn't look to me like the resolution was dipping to compensate. This makes me wonder if they have a locked resolution in mobile and in handheld. I'm sorry, in handheld and in docked mode. And because of that, that's why the frame rate's not as stable. But they're doing that on purpose for the Switch Pro. I don't know, wild speculation to throw out there. Again, Monster Hunter Rise looks incredible. It might be the game pushing Switch hardware to the max. So I'm pretty excited to see what they're able to do. And obviously now that we're hitting the maximum capabilities of the Nintendo Switch with a purpose built Switch game. You know, that's usually when you start to talk about the next hardware. Because that usually doesn't happen until the end of generations for most platforms. Hence why a lot of the games at the end of the PlayStation 3 generation looked absolutely incredible in comparison to the beginning. Because that's usually when you start hitting the maximum capabilities of the platform. It's usually towards the end. So that if it's happening now, that means, yep, that's what's pro stuff is probably true. It's probably right on the horizon. All right, folks. I am Ethan Rumpenjitz from the Nintendo Prime. Thank you so much for tuning in to this Monster Hunter Rise special. And I'll catch you in the next video.


Let's have a look at the first hands-on. We will execute CoreMark on STM32-L5 discovery kit, and we'll do that at two various frequencies, at the maximum 110 MHz and then at 24 MHz. The goal is to see that the CoreMark score is linear with frequency, which is thanks to the fact that there is a low number of weight states on the internal flash, and thanks to the eye-cache that accelerates the code execution at higher frequencies. The application output some useful information on the ST-Link virtual comport that we will display on the terminal window, in this case the data term. I'm going to use STM32-L5 discovery kit that has the version of L5 with the integrated SMPS. On the board you'll also find ST-Link V3 power shield to do power consumption measurement, and various other components such as external memories, Bluetooth module, etc. To display some runtime messages during the CoreMark execution we will use the virtual comport of the ST-Link, and in the next hands-on we'll also use the cube monitor power to measure the consumption during the execution of CoreMark. In the link underneath this video you will find all the materials to be able to reproduce everything that you see in this hands-on. Throughout the video I will only use binaries, but you are free to have a look inside the source code later on. Please make sure that you unzip the folder in the path with no spaces. This is especially important because of the batch script that opens the charter window. Let's start by connecting USB cable to ST-Link V3 connector. Then we should make sure the jumpers and switches are in the correct position. The jumper at the bottom right should be in the rightmost position, in the position 5V from the ST-Link. The switch in the middle of the board should be in the right position also, on the VDD. This will make sure that the target microcontroller is properly supplied from the ST-Link. Then go to the hands-on folder and start the terra-term script. This will launch the standalone terra-term that is included inside the tools folder. If you have troubles doing that, just open your preferred terminal window and set up the connection parameters as highlighted in the slide. The USB cable is now plugged into the ST-Link. We can connect to the target and flash the two binaries. I have pre-compiled one binary for CoreMark running at 110 MHz and a second one running at 24 MHz. ST-Link enumerates also as a master reach, so the easiest way to flash a binary is simply drag and drop it to the ST-Link master reach. So in just a moment, you see the binary was flashed and the CoreMark is immediately executed. If I press the reset, it will start from the beginning. So the CoreMark needs to run for at least 10 seconds to get a valid result. So let's wait a bit. Okay, and here we go. You see the code ran for 11 seconds, which is fine. It ran 5000 iterations. So the CoreMark score is 443 iterations per second. I used RMC-Link v6.14 as a compiler and set the flags to optimize for speed. The code is of course running from flash and at the very bottom we see the confirmation of the frequency, which is 110 MHz. So let's now run the second binary. I will just flash it in. Again, we need to wait at least 10 seconds to get a valid result. And here we go. The CoreMark score is 98.3 iterations per second. So if we divide the CoreMark score with the frequency, we get approximately 4 for both cases, which is a proof that the relationship is in fact linear. Here you see another comparison of STM32L5 with one of our competitor that is also based on Cortex M33. To make this comparison fair, we are using the same compiler and the same compiler flags. This is also the reason why the result for 110 MHz is few percent less than in the demonstration that we have just did with RMC-Link. L5 scores at 80 MHz just few points less than the other device at 150. So to summarize, the system-level architecture of a chip is extremely important factor that affects not only the performance but also power efficiency, as you will see in the next demonstration.


When you have a quantitative or measured variable, like the price of an order or the amount of time somebody spent on your website, or the number of kids in a family, you want to make a histogram as a way of looking at the overall shape of the distribution. It helps you see if there's any spikes in particular places helps you see if there's gaps and outliers. So let's take a look at some artificial data I have here on hypothetical orders or totals from particular clients. We've got a bunch of rows of data here, 113. But let's just come over and click on insert chart. One of the things is Google Sheets again is smart and is able to figure out that a histogram would be most appropriate for this. There's a few things that we need to change. However, I need to click on this and get rid of the legend because it's just silly and taking up space. And what you can see is that most of the orders are down here low. It's drawing a box that goes from $0 to $1,650. The next one to $3,300. By the way, the width of these boxes, the fact that it goes to 1650 than 3,300, that's called the bucket width or bin width. And it's arbitrary. You can make it as small as you want as big as you want. What Google Sheets is doing is it's using a rule of thumb that says, you know, usually somewhere around 7,911 bars is best. And so it's dividing the data up to do that. And you can see we've got one case way up here, we got this big gap here in the middle. This is a skewed distribution, which is actually what you expect anytime you're dealing with something like money. And we've got this one big outlier. Now when you have an outlier like this, the first thing you want to do is see, is that data correct? And if it is correct, then you get to decide what you want to include it in. It may be, for instance, that because it's so unusual, it represents a different category, you don't want to include it with the others. But let me show you a couple of things you can do to help clean up a histogram to help decide what's going on with your data. I'm going to double click on this. And well, since it brought me to this one, I'm just going to change the color because I prefer that color. But let me come back up to histogram. You can change the bucket size. Now, it's doing buckets at $1,650 each, which I think is silly. So I'm going to manually change them to $1,000 each. And while it does introduce a lot more empty space here, it's easier to read them. I'm going to change these values here and not have them slanted slanted is really hard to read. I'm just going to make them straight up vertical. At least it's easier to tell what's going on there. And so this is one way of looking at we still have this big outlier we got this huge gap but it lets us know where most of our cases are. Now Google Sheets does give you one option for dealing with outliers. Of course, you could just exclude it from the data say this is not representative of the group that we want to deal with or you could use a different kind of analysis. But there is one option. So I'm going to double click on this, come to the histogram. And as this one right here, it's outlier percentile. And what this does is it takes the highest certain percent of cases, and it brings them down and puts them in the next lowest bar. So watch what happens when I do this. Right now we've got this one case up here, we got this huge gap, and then the next size is at 5000. So if I click this 1%, boom, it brings it way down. Now what it's also done, unfortunately, is it's changed the way it draws the bins and labels them. And it gives them these really weird arbitrary cutoff points. And unfortunately, there's really not much you can do about that, you know, you can try going down to horizontal axis and manually setting the values to zero. But once you've done the binning thing, it doesn't have any effect.  You could do a higher percentage if you wanted, you could do for instance, 5%. And you see it changes a little bit more. But you're never going to get rid of these weird bins down here. So the only way to get rid of those by the way is to just back up and do the undo and undo and undo. And now you're back to where you were originally. But the important thing here is that Google Sheets is able to draw a histogram by default, you're able to see that most of your order totals are in the 1000 or 2000 range. And then you got this really huge gap with this one extremely high total up here more than three times as high as anybody else. But this is the purpose of a histogram to help you find these generalities where most of the orders are, and the outliers exceptions. And so this gives you a good start on trying to make sense of your orders and what you want to do next in your business.


All those Zoom calls, all those FaceTime calls you've done with people, you've already been on camera, you already have hours and maybe days of experience already doing this. So that means that you're already comfortable in front of the camera. So all you gotta do is put your mind to it and just go live. It doesn't matter where or how, go live. It doesn't matter with what microphone, with what camera, just go live with your cell phone. You got a $1,000 cell phone in your pocket. It has a good camera and you can microphone and sometimes better than a laptop. So why not just go live with that? If you want to share your message with the world, just think of it like that way. You've done it a thousand times. This is one more time and people are not even looking back at you. So how easy is that?  Viewers will come with the journey. You won't get a thousand viewers the first day. Guaranteed, you'll get maybe one. So don't worry about it.


Molecular layer deposition, MLD, and atomic layer deposition, ALD, have been used to create hybrid materials with unique properties. By combining the two techniques, it is possible to produce hybrid materials with both inorganic and organic components. This has led to the development of new materials with enhanced performance characteristics such as improved thermal stability, increased mechanical strength, and better electrical conductivity. Additionally, the ability to precisely control the thickness and composition of the layers allows for the creation of complex three-dimensional structures. This article was authored by Pia Sundberg and Merrick Carpennan.


That's what makes them feel alive But when you stop caring When you stop giving a damn about what they think It completely destroys them And then they are forced to reflect on their own insignificance You can walk away empowered You can walk away stronger and more confident In control of your life and claiming your rights You can walk away as a survivor Thank you for watching. I hope this video resonates with you Please like, comment, share and subscribe Click the bell icon to receive notifications for my future videos If you liked it today My PayPal link is in the video description Come to the choir who's coming with me And I'll just have a coaching at jimmy.com Thank you for watching and I'll talk to you soon


Hey friends, welcome back to my channel. Today I have such a fun and festive video for you all. So I have put up a few of the Christmas slash winter decor pieces that I own and we've got the diffusers going with cinnamon and cypress and the house smells so cozy and feels so warm with all of the little twinkle lights. And today I'm gonna be sharing with you a few treats for over the holidays, really just to enjoy with hot cocoa through the winter.  So the first thing that I'm going to be making up is some homemade marshmallows. And in our house we have some really big food sensitivities and recently found out how serious they really are, especially for my one daughter. So making our own homemade goodies at home like this is just the way to go for us to know that she's gonna feel her absolute best. So to make homemade marshmallows is actually really simple. I'm relatively new to doing this and didn't realize how easy it actually is. So I'm just sifting together some powdered sugar and a little bit of cornstarch. You'll use this later on to help the marshmallows not stick together. You're gonna start out with some really hot water. I like to use my tea kettle for this. And I feel like every time I show this tea kettle in a video, everybody wants to know where it's from. My husband actually got it for me for Christmas last year and it is off of Amazon and I can link it below if you are interested or maybe you wanna get it for Christmas or someone else in your life. So really marshmallows are made with gelatin and some sugar and I'm just using some organic cane sugar and also whatever you wanna flavor it with for a more traditional marshmallow flavor you're gonna go with vanilla and that's what I did this time. However, I think the next batch I make I'm going to make peppermint. I just think it would be so delicious in hot chocolate. So you're going to heat up the sugar and water mixture and I actually like to use a thermometer for this. I will leave the recipe link below that I follow for these again, incredibly simple although they do take some time to sit and you'll want them to sit overnight once you have them mixed up. So if you're planning to use them the day after you make them you might want to plan that extra time that they need to sit to really set up and get that nice fluffy marshmallow-y texture. Once I lined my dish here I just took some of that powdered mixture and shook it over the dish and one of the keys to making homemade marshmallows is to use a mixer. I really don't know if it would be successful hand whisking it. If you've ever made marshmallows by hand whisking them let me know in the comments but I just use my stand-up mixer. It is a brand off of Amazon that's very inexpensive. I would highly recommend it. I've had mine for quite a while and the price is an absolute fraction of a KitchenAid. So if you're looking for a good mixer that has a nice big bowl you may wanna check that out. So I'm just spreading the marshmallow type fluff into that bowl or dish, lined dish. And I'm gonna go ahead and just set that aside until the next day. Before I share too much about the next recipe I wanted to tell you all that today's video I am collabing with Kiri. I enjoy her channel so much. I'm gonna let her introduce herself and tell you a little bit about her content but definitely when you're finished here you're gonna wanna check out her channel link below. Hi, I'm Kiri with Healthfully Rooted Home and I'm so excited for this opportunity to collaborate with Adeline on this video. I'm a wife, mother and full-time homemaker and I love sharing about healthy homemaking, meal planning, cooking from scratch and home management routines. It's my desire to help women develop a passion for their role in the home as I share how I intentionally make our house a home. My channel is a place for you to light a candle, curl up with a warm cup of coffee or tea in your favorite mug and get inspired about homemaking in a way that honors the Lord. My prayer is that you get a few sweet little mementos every time you watch my channel. Consider them little blessings from my house to yours. When you're finished watching Adeline's video, I'd be delighted if you'd stop by my channel to say hello. I'm sharing a similar video on how to make holiday cookies in advance so that you can enjoy them all throughout the season. Thanks again to Adeline for partnering with me on this video. I love her channel. It brings me so much joy as she shares her heart and homemaking. Okay, now back to baking. This recipe involves using oat flour. I have shared this, not that long ago, how to make oat flour. You just take some oatmeal, rolled oats. I think you could probably use any type of oatmeal. Put it in your blender and blend it into a flour. It's so incredibly simple. And through the holiday season, if you have friends or family members that need some gluten-free style recipes for your gatherings and you're the one making them, this is a good way for you to be able to make a gluten-free recipe. Now, if someone has a gluten allergy, you might wanna check with them if they are able to have oat flour made from regular oats or do they need to be a certified gluten-free oat? Because sometimes oats are tossed in flour to help them not stick together. So you might wanna investigate that, but if the person is okay with using regular oats, then you don't have to buy any special ingredients to make oat flour. So these cookies, I am so excited to share with you. I'm mixing up the dough to let it chill while I mix up the next cookie dough recipe and we'll get back to this, but it is an oat flour cutout cookie that turns out incredible. So we'll get back to that here in a moment. In the meantime, we're gonna mix up another oatmeal cookie recipe. This is so delicious. It has just a couple of ingredients that you probably have in your house and again, could be gluten-free friendly, depending on if the oats have to be certified gluten-free for that person. So if you are taking things to a family gathering and you wanna make sure that you've got some kind of option for someone there that has a gluten sensitivity, this could be a recipe for you without having to go to the store for any special ingredients. Again, I will leave this recipe typed out in the description box, but essentially it is some brown sugar, regular sugar, I think it's got some baking soda, it's got eggs, butter, and your rolled oats and then finishing off with chocolate chips and these are so addicting, they're so delicious. I feel like they're just the perfect cookie to go along with a cold winter day.   They're not going to really flatten out themselves, so taking the time to smash them out a little bit before you bake them will give them more of that cookie shape. So this project is something that I have been wanting to do for quite some time and this day was a perfect opportunity to do it and that is I took some of my raw cane sugar and I found these food colorings on Amazon, again I'll leave them linked below, but they are actually made with fruit and vegetable juice. That's where the coloring comes from and as we were actually using these sprinkles later on with the cut out cookies, my daughters were trying to guess what fruits or vegetables could potentially make that color of sprinkles. So that was kind of a fun subject and we've been talking a lot about why we wanna avoid a lot of food colorings. They just are not good for us and in a lot of other countries besides the US they actually can't even sell things with some of the colorings that we use here. So that's one thing that I've been really trying to do so along with Christmas cookies and besides I'm gonna say the colors that these came out to be and how they looked on the sugar cookies, I thought they looked so much more appetizing and really just precious because they were more of a pastel looking sprinkle as you'll see here after a bit. So we got the cookie cutters out and we even got some really tiny miniature cookie cutters from Walmart this year. I think they were like $2 or something like that and once I had to let the cut out cookie dough cool for quite some time, I used my very heavy rolling pin with some parchment paper to roll it all out to about a quarter inch and I just can't explain how good these cookies are. They have a almond extract in them and the flavoring is just so delicious. They have the best texture. That was one thing I was a little bit curious to see how the texture would turn out and the texture was so good. If you kind of think of the iced oatmeal cookies that you buy in a package from the store, you know how they have a bit of a chew to them? That's a little bit how these cut out cookies taste or feel when you bite into them. They have just a little bit of that chewy texture like oatmeal often brings and I just think it adds to the almond flavoring and the girls have been really enjoying these and of course it's just fun that my daughter that cannot have gluten can enjoy these and she doesn't feel excluded at all. So once the cookies were out of the oven, we were ready to start decorating. I didn't film a whole lot of the decorating process simply because you know how it is when you're decorating cookies with three children. It can be a little bit interesting and I just wanted to enjoy the moment. It just was so special and so much fun to decorate with them but they enjoyed this a lot and honestly I think we'll probably do another round of sugar cookies like this before Christmas so that we have some over the holidays especially to take along for my daughter to family events. Okay, so once the marshmallows had sat overnight you're gonna see how they have sat up and you wanna be really liberal with the powdered sugar mixture and just kind of coat and fluff that over everything as you're cutting them out. It just helps a lot to be able to keep the marshmallows from sticking to each other and I wanted a good size to put into hot chocolate. I think if I were to make these to say make s'mores or something like that I probably would double this recipe so that the marshmallows would be a lot thicker and we would be able to put them on roasting sticks or something like that to roast over a fire but because I was kind of going for more of like a mini marshmallow size for in a mug of hot chocolate this was just fine and they still were nice and fluffy and I just took a pizza cutter and cut through them all and they are just so delicious. I think it helps so much whenever you use a pure vanilla extract that you know is of good quality you really get that delicious vanilla flavor in the marshmallows. And then I just took some extra powder and tossed them kind of all around in the powder so that they wouldn't stick to each other and I'm going to just store these in an airtight container. You could probably store them on the counter I feel like because they are just essentially gelatin and sugar I don't think that it would matter to store them on the counter like you would chocolate chip cookies in a container or something like that but I figured we will be using these over the next little while whenever we have hot chocolate which is not necessarily every day. So I decided to just put them in an airtight container in the refrigerator and store them that way so that they have a little bit of a longer shelf life for me and my daughters were having fun test tasting these as well. I think that just the possibility of making a lot of different flavors or even colors if you add in some of that food coloring that I was showing you you could make some really fun marshmallows. Okay, so this is a very traditional treat in my family and in my husband's family and that is Buckeyes and I know there might be different names for this treat so let me know in the comments what you guys would call this or simply let me know what are some of your traditional family treats during the holidays that you like to make every year or maybe your mom or grandmother made them. I think it's such a fun topic to discuss. So what I am doing is mixing some peanut butter, some butter, some rice krispies and some powdered sugar. My preferred powdered sugar is the powdered cane sugar that Azure standard carries. I just know then it hasn't been bleached but you just mix it all together to create a dough.  Whatever size you think is good. Some people make them bigger, some people make them a little bit smaller and I put them into the refrigerator or the freezer to get them really, really cold so they hold together during the chocolate dipping process. So here I made myself a little double broiler and I just put one of my glass mixing bowls on top of a saucepan and I put some dark chocolate chips. I like to use unsweetened peanut butter with this and dark chocolate chips. I feel like the unsweetened peanut butter helps to balance out the powdered sugar and makes them not overkill sweet and then the dark chocolate also helps to balance out the sweetness of the peanut butter, rice krispie part. And actually I don't think I mentioned I used a chunky peanut butter for this. I think it just adds to the texture and makes it more crunchy when you get to bite into the center of it. These are just absolutely delicious. We enjoy these so much and I like to use a little skewer to help kind of get the whole thing covered in chocolate. Don't forget to check out Kiri's video. I know she has some fantastic ideas for you all. If you're new here, don't forget to subscribe. Thanks so much for spending some time with me today. I hope that you got inspired and I hope you all have a great week.


The source is a biography of Harriet Tubman, and it was written by Sarah Hopkins Bradford, who knew Tubman's family from Auburn, New York, and knew Tubman herself, and wrote the story of Tubman's life to try to help raise money in Tubman's older age when she was quite poor. It gives us a very close account of Harriet Tubman's life, which is valuable in part because Tubman wasn't literate. She didn't read or write English. So the fact that she actually sat down with Sarah Bradford and told her story to Bradford means we can come pretty close to what it was that Harriet Tubman experienced. Bradford ended up writing two different versions of this biography. The first one was written in 1868, published in 1869, and it was written really for a clearly intended purpose. Harriet Tubman was poor. She was struggling to get a pension from the US government for her work during the Civil War as a nurse and also as a spy, and she hadn't been successful. So she really needed money just to live on and to take care of her household. And her community members in Auburn, New York thought that telling her life story could be a way to earn money for her. So this creates a limitation on the source. It was written so that it would get an audience who would pay money to hear the story. And that means that there could be some aspects of the story of Tubman's life that would be told for this audience, and some that could be held back because the audience might not want to pay to hear about it. Well Harriet Tubman is, she's a mythic figure in African American history, in African American women's history, American women's history, and American history. She has an incredible life story, and I think that has been a wonderful thing, but also it has been limiting because she has become a larger-than-life almost stereotype in the ways that we think about the history of slavery. And she's often talked about in Black History Month, for example, but only with a sentence or two about her life. So part of the challenge in studying Tubman's life is to try to get beyond this picture of a superhuman person who had incredible strength and did all these things that seen them possible. It's very difficult to get at the sense that Harriet Tubman was a real person. She was born a slave on the eastern shore of Maryland. She had a very, very difficult childhood. She was hired out by her master at a very young age. When she was only five, she was sent to work for another family, and she had charge of an infant, a five-year-old, was a babysitter for an infant. And she was expect to know how to care for this child and to keep it quiet through the night. And of course, she couldn't, so she would be whipped by her mistress for not taking proper care of this baby. Tubman was a real person, and she suffered real trials, real hardships under slavery. And I think that that aspect of her life gets covered over when we only think of her as the woman who went back to the south to save scores of slaves. Well, she was born around 1820. It's not exactly clear when she was born because records about slaves are often limited. And when she was a young woman, she decided to escape. She had already lost sisters who had been sold, and she thought that her best chance of having any kind of future was to secure her own freedom. So she organized her own escape in 1849. She made it to Philadelphia, and she then spent the next decade dedicating her life to freeing other people who were enslaved, her family, other people she knew, and then also strangers. And it's really, it's mind-blowing to think about the incredible dedication that Harriet Tubman had to liberty when she wasn't going on trips to the south to free people. She was working in the north to earn money to pay for her trips. So she did this for about ten years, and around 1858 she went to maybe semi-retirement and she wasn't going back into the south herself, but she was using her home in New York as a place where fugitives who were continuing to head north could stop and have safe haven. And then when the Civil War came, she was very active working for the Union troops. She had an incredible set of skills and talents. So in addition to being someone who knew the landscape well enough to be able to help slaves escape, she was really smart and she organized this spiring to bring information from the South Carolina interior to the federal troops. She was also very caring. She was a nurse who used her knowledge of native plants to try to help the soldiers.


day's discussion would be on l oùnwix isn't the world since we are discussing one who is mind concept of mind we need to see how mind is related with the world. And this relation is possible through language human beings are not only conces beings but arrangements for human beings are not only conscious beings but they are linguistic beings. We need to analyse and understand how these linguistic beings relate themselves to the world. This is one of the important questions regarding, the mind-languages, world relationship. where we explore this, referring to the notion of meaning, particularly meaning guided by human intention, meaning guided by human intentionality. So let us try to explain how the psychological Splash mind yarn language on the webі Now we understand following the discussion on the world of mind and logic and the world in conjunction with, . Could closer to the world, the main works and Julie coz, condom on LANGUAGE, industry and thought, we have discuss areast Kanintellig nursery solving our children from school, languation with Rav 1997💛 Today I will also focus a bit on the representational features of language.  değiş  değiş  us                                                                                ḣ consequently ḣ ḅ, extra ɣ Standing the ̑s p r h i n ʻy Through them, the way in the system that we have tried to show us that post years only the sound significant but linguistic presentations are connected with human experiences . There are connected withversen of mind and in general. about the notion of meaning, without taking into account the notion of experience and other psychological features, so therefore, the use theory of meaning must relate to the representational theory of meaning which was advocated the representational theory of meaning which was advocated earlier. Now if somebody emphasizes that it is only through linguistic representation that meaning can be analyzed, then the question would be is there a kind of a symmetry between the linguistic representation on the one hand and the mental representation on the other hand. Sal has clearly shown us that so far the content is concerned, so far the structure of representations are concerned, the quantities is static meaning thereby the content of thought and the content of an expression of that particular thought are identical. So, so in that sense Sal is trying to draw our attention to this fact that mental representation are connected with linguistic representations. And so in that sense Sal is trying to draw our attention to this fact that mental representation are connected whenever we try to understand meaning with reference to mind we cannot rule out this fact that how meaning is construed from the perspective of language, language as well as experience. So, the experiential component that is embedded in our linguistic activities is very much part of the whole analysis of meaning and the mind-world relationship or mind-language world relationship. So, that is that is the background of this particular talk, I would like to emphasize here with reference to this linguistic representation of the world. Whenever we talk about the language and one relationship, we need to also bring in how language represents the world. And in other words how the world is articulated by language that is very important. So, within the semantic structure of all the sentences the language world relationship is not fully settled. If you only a person who is talking about the language and one relationship, you need to also bring in how language represents the world and in other words how the world is articulated by language that is very important. So, within the semantic structure of all the sentences, the language world relationship is not fully settled. If you only emphasize on language or language use, there is a possibility that we would commit to some form of reductionism or we will commit to some kind of a eliminativism as if mind is not a necessary or as if certain mental features are not essential for the analysis of meaning. Our focus would be how certain mental states are involved in in the linguistic expressions and thereby elucidating the the content. So, we would like to discuss that. Now, so far the meaning is concerned, meaning is a common element between language and the world. There is essentially a kind of a gap, a gap which is seen with reference to language on the one hand and the world on the other. The representational theory of meaning advocates that the world is a linguistic representation is intentionally connected to the world. In other words, expressions are directed towards the world. If there is an expression, then expression is directed towards the world. So, this directedness shows a kind of a intentional connection between the world on the one hand and the language on the other hand. Now, the language user or what I call the linguistic, the linguistic beings are connected to the world. There are very much part of the world and their connection is established through intentionality and as Searle points out, intentionality is a pre-linguistic phenomenon. Intentionality is being defined as a pre-linguistic phenomenon. Precisely keeping this in the background that language has evolved as an institutional fact, whereas intentionality is an intrinsic feature of human beings. In other words, intentionality is an intrinsic feature of all biological beings. There are many biological beings who do not probably use language as we use, who probably do not create any kind of sound. In other words, intentionality is an intrinsic feature of all biological beings. So, thereby the mode of communication for them is not through language, but may be through something else, but so far the human beings are concerned. Since they leave a linguistic form of life, it is very important for us to show how language helps us explaining this intentional relationship. Without language, the intentional link with the world is possible, but with language, how this intentionality gets a surplus feature to talk about the world. To theorize about the very existence of the reality is something very significant to the whole epistemic discourses that human beings are involved with. Therefore, how meaning of a sentence is fixed? Is it fixed because of intentionality because of this consciousness or the conscious attitudes, intentional attitude of consciousness? Or it is fixed through certain other linguistic categories, which are non-intentional in nature. We would like to see this, that meaning is something clothing the world as Pradhan advocates it. Meaning is the semantic clothing of the world and for that reason it is not a contingent product of our sense experiences. So, here is an impression given to us that there is no naturalistic theorization of meaning possible in order to dissolve all kinds of problems that is there within the framework of semantics in general. The naturalistic account does not resolve the problem of truth, which is very much part of the discourse of meaning. Hence, the non-naturalist account of meaning emphasizes that the naturalistic account does not resolve the problem of truth, which is very much part of the discourse of meaning. So, here it is that the world language relationship is not a contingent phenomenon, rather it is necessarily, rather the relationship is intrinsic and we would like to see how this relationship is conceptualized as an intrinsic relationship. It is intrinsic precisely because the non-naturalists have tried to show us that there is a kind of a fitting relationship, what Searle calls the direction of fit. The direction of fit suggests that there is a kind of a fitting relationship. There is a language to world relationship. Say for example, when the linguistic beings express something, then this expression represents something about the world. This directedness is not only one directional, rather but also self-referential in nature. Searle, while explaining the nature of meaning, tries to show us this double level of intentionality that is working between the language and the world. So, therefore we need to talk about this notion of direction of fit, as if there is a kind of a fitness, fitting relationship. I should not call it fitness, rather it is a fitting relationship between language and the world. And this is construed looking at the notion of representation in particular, how human beings express something, how human beings express something, how human beings express something. So, therefore we need to talk about this notion of direction of fit, as if there is a kind of a fitness, fitting relationship. I should not call it fitness, rather it is a fitting relationship between language and the world. And this is construed looking at the notion of representation in particular, how human beings represent the world, because whether it is thought or an expression, both are directed, both exhibit this intentionality. One can understand it with reference to any kind of language used, particularly when we talk about the formative utterances, whether it is indicative, request or command, they also this directedness, a kind of an intentional link between language and the world. The language user on the one hand and the world or the other audiences on another side. So, that is how we need to see how the speaker is connected to the world or how the speaker is connected to the audience and how the audience is connected to the speaker. And this connection, this exchange, the linguistic exchange between the speaker and the audience is a kind of an intentional connection. It is intentional precisely because the intentionality is grounded in language. So, the later Wittgensteinian will emphasize on this fact that intentionality is grounded in language. They never question the ontology of language, whereas Searle is questioning the very ontology of language. Hence, he considers that intentionality is a pre-linguistic activity. But for me, intentionality though is pre-linguistic. So, for the human linguistic creatures as concerned, it is through language that Searle is questioning the very ontology of language. So, in that sense, we need to further proceed to this questions. Is meaning a mental entity? Because meaning is not only discussed with reference to the very ontology of language. So, what we say, rather we also give importance to this fact that what we mean, saying and meaning are necessarily connected in the sense that if I request you to bring a glass of water, I must have at least this assumption that you would go to the world and bring a glass of water. Now, if I do not mean that, then my request is nothing but a misfire. My request will not bring the kind of satisfaction which I would derive seeing that you are going to fetch a glass of water for me. In that sense, linguistic actions are actions which carries the content in them, actions which communicate things to the audience or to the world. So, let us look at the context of these actions. Language use is basically about communication, basically about the exchange of ideas and thoughts to generate understanding. Now, understanding is again a kind of a mental activity. Now, let us do not go into that part. Try to see how the mental is connected with the linguistic. The association of meaning with the psychological property of language needs to be discussed when we talk about meaning is a mental entity, but some of the philosophers, particularly those who argue for a representational semantics, they try to distance themselves from psychologicalism as if to say that meaning is related to mind, they would commit to some kind of psychologicalism which is a dangerous trend in philosophy of mind, which is a dangerous trend in philosophy of language, particularly when we try to theorize the concept of meaning. So, without committing to the problem of psychologicalism, we try to understand the concept of psychologicalism. How can we construe this fact that meaning is associated with mind? By saying that meaning is associated with mind, I do not commit that meaning exists in the mind. So, rather I would accept this position that meaning or the content is very much a part of this notion of experience, the kind of intentional field it creates. It is neither wholly there in our mind, it is only there in our mind. Nor it is there in the world which probably the externalist would try to suggest, I would suggest that it is very part of experience, it is part of that intentional linguistic field that has been created by human beings, created by these human linguistic beings. So, from that point of view, we need to comprehend this notion of meaning. The need for a comprehensible theory of meaning includes the need of taking into account the mental attitudes, beliefs and the intention of the speaker who matters to language so much. So, when we talk about language use, the intention based semantics has emphasized basically on this mental attitudes of the speaker. What the speaker intends to speak, what he intends to communicate to the hearer is more important. What does he believe? When I say I need a glass of water, so this request of mind assumes the fact that I believe water can quench my thrust or I believe this fact that passing this request to you, you would go and fetch a glass of water for me. So, the expression, the intentional expression is connected with belief, it is connected with so many other desires that I have. So, intention is one of the mental states, one of the varieties of mental states and when we talk about linguistic communication or communication intention, we do not say it in isolation from the other mental states, rather they are all connected, they are all intentionally connected, they are connected through intentionality. Hence, we need to understand this intentional link between the language and the world, between the human beings and the world, because human beings are not only conscious beings, they are also linguistic beings. So, therefore, it is essential for us to talk about this. The speaker's intention has a basic feature of meaning, because the psychological states are linguistic states. So, when we talk about say for example, p as a psychological state, p has some kind of content, because it is about something. So, being a psychological state, it has some content, which when it is expressed in the form of expression, it refers to a particular fact or an object in the world. So, that is, that is very much important. So, what is the psychological state? It is expressed there, but when it is expressed, it is expressed through a kind of a psychological mode, the mode in which a particular expression is being articulated is also important and we all know about it when we talked about the performative utterances with reference to the speech act theory. It is only when we talk about the intentional expressions, only when we talk about expression of this utterances or this very idea of talking about statement making, then we have that we make the intention explicit. I am very clear when I am making you a suggestion, please read this material on speech act. So, this is where I am making my intention explicit in my suggestions. So, the intentions are explicit, when I say get me a glass of water please, here my intention is explicit, you feel the urgency of getting a glass of water for me. Hence, we need to show that is a high quality speech act theory, how these expressions are being articulated. Antony Matty writes and I am quoting Matty here that the expression of psychological life which is the exclusive and a primary aim of intentional speech, what is rather intended is to influence or to control the unknown inner life. So, we need to talk about the inner life of the speaker as well as the hearer, the unknown inner life of the hearer, because when I make this statement or a request, I must also making this attempt to know what is the inner life, going on in your mind whether you would listen to my request. So, in that sense the intentional speech is a kind of action which is essentially and at evoking certain psychological phenomena in the person. So, the speech is intentionally directed towards the hearer and it evokes some kind of expected thought. In the mind of the hearer and the speaker must put it in that form, so that he succeeds in evoking that mental fact in the mind of the hearer. So, there is an attempt on the part of the speaker to articulate the expression, in fact in the mind of the hearer.  Hence, the speech is equivalent of any kind of action as I will say, it is a special action. Now, as I said, there are naturalist understanding of intention by semantics or the meaning in general, there are non-naturalist theorization of meaning. The naturalists have tried to explain the notion of meaning and the language world relationship with reference to causality. According to them, the naturalists briefly, this relationship that we talk about between the language and the world are causally bound. It is a natural in that sense. It can be causally explainable. The non-naturalist try to go beyond this causal dependency argument. They try to show what are the non-causal phenomena are responsible for constring meaning. So, therefore, when we talk about intention based semantics in particular, we have a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker, a speaker. Let us say, utter statement, the proposition is a P knowing well that the hearer Y would mean K. P is intentionally produced so that Y listens to P and means K. Now, this intentional relationship that I was talking about, referring to this idea of evoking some kind of mental state in the mind of the hearer is something very significant. The non-naturalist account emphasizes that the non-naturalist is a non-naturalist. The non-naturalist account emphasizes that meaning is an informative act. They are also descriptive rather than being explanatory about the notion of meaning. They also argue that speaker's intention or speaker's intentional expression of certain things tries to induce meaning in the hearer's mind. So, this idea of inducing the content is something very special to Paul Grice who talk about intention based semantics in the beginning. Now, Grice's theory also adheres to the notion of representation in this sense that the speaker's not simply utters to induce rather makes a deliberate attempt, quote-unquote, it is a deliberate attempt in the sense that one is thinking rationally about it in telling and making the hearer to think over it in order to fulfill his intention. So, when we talk about speech act, we try to conceptualize or in fact there is a need to conceptualize the course of action, what I am saying, what do I mean when I say this and what the hearer would mean if I say this. All this is to design a kind of a or a pre-conceptualize a kind of course of action before saying something, because you are not just expressing whatever comes to your mind, rather you are deliberately or rationally trying to suggest the hearer that this is what he is trying to do and that is the reason. So, you are not just expressing whatever comes to your mind, whether you are deliberately or rationally trying to suggest the hearer that this is what he is trying to do. So, what is being expected from you when you hear this statement of mind? So, in that sense there is a necessity to talk about reason, there is a necessity to talk about how a particular course is rationally being formed. So, in that sense there is you know fixity of reason in the domain of communication, your reason can change, you can make shift. So, the course that you form, the field that you are creating, through intentionality, through rationality, I mean for all intentionality and rationality are necessarily connected, to be intentional is to be you know rational, it is that kind of thing he is arguing for. Intentional actions are not just merely desired actions, there could be desired independent actions as I mentioned. In one of my lectures earlier, now we need to see how the speaker deliberately putting an expression and also wants this ability to manipulate in a sense the very course of action, hence there is no fixity of reason. So, that is, so that is a possibility to talk about how fixity of reason in the domain of communication. And what does Gray says? Gray says this points to the fact for acts to have meaning in the domain of communication. The intended effect must be something which in some sense of reason, the recognition of intention behind acts is for the audience a reason not merely a cause, reason for believing and reason for doing. So, that very fact that the guys is talking about a non-naturalist theory of meaning, shows that when I am saying acts, then this very saying is not a cause, whether it is a reason or reason, that enforces on the audience to act as I am expected to act. Sal will call it a kind of a mental causation. So, Sal has a different vocabulary altogether when he talks about how mental states are expressed and this ability to express or the ability to cause intense election. Sal says, this is all mental causation. Let us do not go into that here. Let us try to understand that Grays makes this distinction very clear to us that reason for believing and reason for doing is the reason for doing. The reason for believing are different from the kind of causal explanation is expected in the case of a naturalist theory of meaning. Stephen Schieffer also critiques Grays intention-based semantics. Schieffer has two things to suggest. One, that this linguistic course of action that we are talking about in the case of Grays following letter of Einstein is construed within the context of a naturalist theory of meaning. Within a kind of a conventional framework of language use where convention is important to explain meaning. Schieffer in the beginning of his discussion intention-based semantics does emphasize that the conventional model is important but in due course he also talks about the psychological model. Now, what is the significance of accepting a psychological model vis-a-vis the conventional model which intention-based semantics holds on to. We need to see that. We need to see what Schieffer advocates in details. Schieffer does talks about the psychological model. Now, what is the significance of accepting a psychological model vis-a-vis the conventional model which intention-based semantics holds on to. We need to see that. We need to see what Schieffer advocates in details. Schieffer does talks about intention of the speaker. A speech is produced by the intention of the speaker. He also emphasizes that the speech is being recognized by the hearer or the audience. So, this saying. So, when we talk about speech, intention of the speaker and the intention of the speaker, he also emphasizes that the speech is being recognized by the hearer or the audience. And the recognition of the speech. We also need to bring in the mutual knowledge that both speaker and the hearer possess. The speaker and the hearer must possess mutual knowledge within a kind of a conventional framework. So, if they do not share that mutuality, then the hearer may not recognize, may not able to recognize what is being said to him. So, therefore, if the speaker and the hearer possess mutual knowledge within a kind of a conventional framework, then the hearer may not recognize what is being said to him. It is important for Schieffer to talk about the concept of a mutual knowledge. The common knowledge within a kind of a framework of convention in which both speaker and the hearer participate while exchanging ideas, thoughts or having a conversation, a meaningful conversation. Schieffer gives a functional analysis to this fact. He says, X intends to produce a reason R in the audience A. It means, X knows about the responses in A. And that is what the common knowledge he talks about. That is what the sharing he talks about. The sharing of the mutual knowledge X knows about the responses. What kind of response a speech would generate is being conceptualized or being conceived minimally by the speaker. So, in that sense, there is a need to talk about the mutual knowledge. Communication intention activates the process of knowing and recognizing each other's intention. So, both hearer and the hearer have a mutual understanding of what is being said to him. And the speaker must know each other's intention. So, the convention, therefore, is bound by some kind of a norms. In other words, both speaker and the hearer, when they participate in the framework of convention, we must also see that how conventions are guided by certain norms. Our conventions are regulated by certain norms. In a classroom atmosphere, both student and the teacher are governed by certain norms. In other words, the activities of the teacher and the activities of the teacher are governed by certain norms. The activities of the student are regulated by certain normative principles of institution. Hence, these norms, in a sense, facilitate the hearer or the student to recognize what kind of things or actions are taken. In other words, it is possible what kind of actions are expected from a teacher or what kind of actions are expected from a student. So, therefore, the reason of these expectations are truth-supporting reasons. Sipar says, the reason of these expectations are very much truth-supporting in this sense. I will conclude reading out this sentence from Sipar. Let us call reason which are held in this way, truth-supporting reasons. Once reason for believing P did not be truth-supporting, one might have moral or prudential grounds of thinking that P. Look at Sipar. Now, Sipar is bringing the notion of morality and prudentiality in order to talk about an authentic intentional action that is being produced by the speaker. Or produced by any agent who is participating in this framework of linguistic field. I would talk about this and elaborate how linguistic communications takes place or must take place within a normative framework. It is through norms we need to have access to truth or truth-supporting reasons. Hence, value is important.


What's going on guys doing a random for this triple laundry tag. It's a lion's chargers and Titans going to roll the dice. How many times we go? It is nine times nine times on the random. Good luck. Good luck. So I got the one on one NT. It's a lion's chargers and Titans will go nine times. Good luck guys. Top spot. I'll get the card. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight and nine. Lions, lions taken home. This triple triple laundry tag relic. Nice one there. Congrats, Lions. You get this written up. Yeah, it is 60. Huff it is. It's a good way to start. Yeah, Timmy. It is my turn. It is my turn on some NT or on the court. He's really quick. Yeah. Thank you. Alrighty, guys. Let me get a platinum anniversary ready to go here. Do another random and we'll get started at five. Yeah, it can happen, Thomas. I mean, it was, uh, since it was a one on one, we emailed to see whether they wanted to sell or they wanted to do a random and random was chosen. So we did the random four to five pickets of it somewhere on there, Timmy. I think I saw Matt hit one right when I walked in today, like the minute I walked in the building, I heard, can you pick it on the RPA? Oh, nice. We'll take that. Alrighty guys, let's get the boxes up here. First up, we got some platinum. How's everyone doing tonight? Hope everyone's having a good Thursday night. Alrighty guys, let's do another random. Good luck here. This will be for top scum platinum anniversary case or six box, half case number one.


You heard the sex tape thing from Pippa Ken on here with Bobo and me, you know, that went crazy. Like if I was if I was to tell the truth, yeah, you know, like a lot of people don't know, man, you know, I ain't gonna say who it is, but it's a real famous rapper and it's a real famous R&B chick. Okay, say Pimp had a tape. Mm-hmm. He didn't say who was on the tape. He didn't. He didn't say, but people started to know who was on the tape. Wait a minute.   Those were some time those some explosive times, bro. Like what do you think? Do you think people be happy with what you're doing right now with the brand and the way that you're you're living your life when it comes to represent his name? I would think he would be pleased.  So I probably could have shot past, you know, I'm saying 100 yards, 10 times by now. But I've been so blessed that I basically want to move the way I'm moving. You know what I mean? I don't want to clip myself trying to risk it all to do this no more. I got I got bona fide ways that turn.  But what I've done with what I have is tremendous. Every day somebody hit me, be like, man, when I got out of jail, you did this for me. Man, you did this for me. So that's richness to me. You know what I mean? So I believe he will be pleased. Straight business. Do you believe he'll be pleased? What's the thing you miss the most about a parent? Chad Butler elaborate. Chad Butler was more of the loving person who was very considerate and compassionate about people he knew, families, old school artists he knew, kids who ran up on them, just individuals he bumped into. He just always wanted to do something for him. You know what I mean? There's plenty of times we're in a mall. I don't even get to tell him, hey, this dude might be a opp because this is a nigga, my brother shot. You know what I mean? And he buy himself some shoes and he buy me some shoes. And he gives the guy his shoes. Like we come straight out the store buying shoes. And I got my shoes and he got his and we see dude.  He's really looking at me like nah, I mean it's good. You know what I mean? You know, it is what it is. So Pimp like, hey man, what's up man? You just got out. He's like, yeah man, I just got out.  So he's like, man, what you doing? Get some shoes? He's like, here man, he hand them his shoes. And I think he went in his wallet and hand them some paper, you know what I'm saying?    So, so that brings up something else. So you're saying Chad Butler and Pimp see, I've heard that before. There's character.  Sweet James, John, Michael Jordan. Yeah, that's just a few that I know because what I love on this snow, you know, what I love was Chad Butler. That's that's the dude. I was at the crib eating big barbecue with a barbecue and making ribs, mama baking cakes, all the kids running around having a good time.     Wow, I've had a few people on here, man. And I'm gonna jump right into it. These guys tell the story about Master P. I heard, I heard OG Percy said the other day ain't no nigga. He had no Texas nigga. And who's that nigga? He had no Texas nigga. You know how he go. Yeah, you know how OG Percy is. But at the end of the day, we've heard this story over and over again. I also seen what G D P put it up to where where it was, you know, where Master P talked a little bit about it. And I know it's old news. I love Master P. I love P. M. C. You know, I love the whole the whole movement of the South. Of course, I don't play about it. All of them coming with me, including Birdman, all of them, including, you know, anything you do. I can grab him from Florida. Yeah, everybody.  What do you think about it? And even J-Dog was just on here and he said J-Dog was on here. And he was like, man, Pimpsy told me one day out the blue man. Yeah, them niggas pistol with me was having a conversation with me one time. And out the blue, he flipped the whole conversation. And it was like, yeah, Master P. They pissed with me. We ain't talking about that. He was talking about nothing. But you know what I'm saying? So just give me your spiel on, like, when you when you heard about it, when you think about it, what are the stories that came to you?  I got it first from Mama. Wow. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Don't just say I got it first from Mama. What did you get from Mama? Explain that to me.  I'm about to. I'm about to tell you what I want to tell you. Give me the information. Give me the mic. Yeah, I did it at 945. No, no, no, no. 6th Street. Mama told me when he got out, he told me. And then I talked to one manager, Red Boy, he told me. So it's a very incredible, explosive story. But the lesson in this story is this.   So the pistol whipping story is what you heard. I don't know. I wasn't there.   Okay. But what did you say Mama told you? Told me what? You say Mama told me about the mountain.  We used to hang together plenty. So do it. When you think about it, do you feel like these stories keep coming up just because it's the way the internet moves because you heard the sex tape thing from Pippa Ken on here with Bobo and me. You know, that went crazy. Like if I was, if I was to tell the truth, yeah, you know, like a lot of people don't know, man. You know, I ain't gonna say who it is, but it's a real famous rapper and it's a real famous R&B chick. Okay. Yeah. Pippa had a naked, he had a recording of them. I think he died with it, but he could, he could have made millions of dollars. And some of the people that's higher up in rap, if they would have seen that tape, you know what I'm saying me?  Yeah, this would have blew it out the way.  I already know who it is.  They made the most money in the game and they weren't supposed to be together or they were together and nobody knew it. They're still together now. Are they still together now? Wow. But it, he, I'm going to tell you something about Ken. Ken never said who was what. He said I knew a story. What did he say? He said I knew a story. He said, I remember a story being told. No, he said he was there. He said, Pimp had a tape. He didn't say who was on the tape. He didn't. He didn't say, but people started to know who was on the tape. Wait a minute. I know. No, but he didn't say who was on the tape or anything like that. But when you hear these stories, you say you know, how would you know? How would I know? You didn't stop. Yeah. Like, how would I not know so much that I do know? Why would I not? So you know who was on the tape. Yeah. Okay. So there was a tape. Yeah. But it wasn't Pimp on the tape. That's what I heard too. See, a lot of people hear what they want to hear. Like, I'm on the internet talking to people every day that's coming. Yeah, Pimp, she had a sex tape with Beyonce. That's why Jay-Z knocked them out. Come on, man.   Hey, man, these people special, man. These people special. Because some people would say, okay, if he wasn't on the sex tape, then why would he have the tape?  Why niggas wind up with other people change? Why niggas always wind up with other people property? Shit happens. You down with OPP? Man, you are the people property. I don't know.


One of the most common questions I get asked is, you know, how do I start day trading? So what me and my mentor about it for our viewers on YouTube is create a free mentorship course that reveals our 12 secrets that every single brand new day trader should know before they get started. But please take note that there is limited seating every single week. So please reserve your spot at myinvestingclub.co. Link is in the description. So today we're going to be talking about cameras because I mean, and you can see how I would have started as I'm doing pretty good.  I don't even think that you can talk all that you have to say about catalysts in like two hours. Um, I mean, just like talking about pharmaceutical catalysts alone, um, would be an entire webinar. So anyway, we're going to get into it. So um, this week we're going to, this week I don't have a rant because, um, I just, I just did one last week. I don't really have anything that's really bugging it, but it's been too slow. And uh, this, this, this content was pretty extensive. So to rant about the market, it sucks, that's end of rent. Um, anyway, so it's a market sentiment webinar, of course. I, I mean, that's, that's pivotal to my trading. So I like to go over it all the time. Um, then we'll talk about the key traders of the week. Um, then we'll get into the, you know, this will be a short and sweet one. We'll get into catalysts. We'll go over all the different kinds and, you know, how to kind of pick them apart a little bit and, um, we can even go over some examples later, um, if we have time and, uh, it's a Q and a webinar. So anytime you guys want to ask me a question, go ahead. If I missed it, repost it and if not a lot of time at the end. And let's keep going. Rant on Q and A's. Yeah. So yeah, if you, um, if you, if you're binge, binge watching this on, um, you know, in your, in your downtime, watching, watching dissecting new information first will kind of help you with this one because that one, you know, kind of goes into how to deal with these PRs in the moment or any kind of information in the moment. That's what a catalyst is, right? It's, it's in, it's a release of new, it's, it's a release of new information to the market, um, that, that traders have to interpret and, and price. So let's go. So last week, all right, I, I, I made some predictions, um, that, that we might have a rocky and shaky confidence right up, uh, or unconfident right up. And as far as the indexes, I'm kind of dead wrong.  No, I was as high as nuts, literally as far as the indexes, it's just like what red candle, right? What red candle? It's literally just up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up. And I don't know if this is a squeeze or anything. What I think this is, I'll get into it, but yeah, it's literally just like a rocket ship. Hey guys, my name is Tosh Bradley. I'm one of the head mentors and monitors at my investing club. If you have any questions about getting started in trading, getting started in the MIC, MIC in general, text me at two, one, three, four, five, eight, five, nine, nine, seven. This is not a robot. It is me directly on the other end of my business line. And, uh, we'll get you in the club. We also have special promotions going on that I can get to you depending on your trading needs. Hit me up. That's the video. In a couple of minutes. I want to read this first, but last week, you know, I talked about how, you know, we got this, this 320, this 320 reject is three 10 whole to give us the confidence to go and retest. I didn't think it would happen as fast, but that's, you know, that, that's what I was kind of, we were talking to, we were talking about last week, but that the strength to me felt kind of fragile. And there wasn't a whole lot of continuation on any of the small cat moves or really on any of the large cat moves. Um, a lot of the individual stocks have a lot harsher stocks than the dailies. Like a lot of the tanks on the names had up, you know, on the stocks at large, you know, we're kind of beaten a lot more than like the QPQ or the indexes. Obviously their index is right there. There's that there's supposed to be that way. Cause it diversified, right? But I thought that it would take a little bit more sideways to continue upwards strongly because of that inflation here that I think is still looming. Um, that's, that's what I thought was the biggest weight.  But, um, I also, um, I also talked to, uh, last week, how I thought I didn't write it, but I thought it was kind of, there's like a few stocks in the stock market that are really driving it up. And that's kind of what I think is going on. I think that's, I mean, the indexes are like the spy and the QPQ are both halfway into the nexus. And I think they're just literally following like the absolute, like that's, I think you're having an over influence right now and people are kind of trading that base off like an accuser following those main stocks and vice versa, but it feels like everyone's kind of dumping everything to put it in those like, if everyone's kind of concentrating their capital into the few winners right now, the few ones that kind of feel safe. And in my opinion, that's kind of, that's a little, that's, that to me shows that a little fear is lingering even though we're showing this strength on the market. Um, that, I mean, that, that could, that could be a hot take, the fact that the indexes are fine, but I don't really see a whole lot of, like you would think that, for example, in a super strong market, like everyone's eyes in the world are on, not, or in the world, but, you know, everybody's eyes is on like Viacron, for example, like a nice large cap stock that was relatively strong compared to the crash and then it dipped heavy and everyone like wants it to bounce and the market's bouncing and yet this one can't bounce. Right. A lot of these stocks are kind of, a lot of these stocks are kind of doing this, right?  See Microsoft is one of like, it's, it's a cap-weighted index, right? So this is really like Microsoft's doing great. It's like identical to the Q's here. And like, it feels like everyone's just concentrating in the few winners here, uh, and leaving everything else like Tesla with the Q's Momo stock, the Momo stocks have not regained their composure and you know, that's, that's really what drives sentiment is like that's what everybody trades for his momentum. Thank you so much for watching our video. You want to see more of our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel by clicking the button here. We do our best to post a new video every single day. If you have any questions about MIC or any general trading questions, please text Tash using the number here. Also stay up to date by watching some of our most recent videos right over here.