This is stock number 10121. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. You're new and used sports car headquarters. Today we are checking out this super clean 2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500. This vehicle has the 5.8 liter supercharged V8 motor and from this HD video you will be able to tell that this car is extremely clean all the way around inside and out. Black is the color we shoot all of our videos in 1080p so if you have HD capabilities on your computer tablet or smartphone device turn them on right now because it is it is your definitely your best way to check out the vehicle before actually seeing it in person. Very clean on this side it does have the black side stripes kind of hard to see but they are there. Comes with the SVT performance package which gives you the painted 19 inch alloy rims. Brembo brakes in the front no scuffs or scrapes on that rim has the Goodyear Eagle F1 265 40 ZR19 tires. Lots of tread left on those front tires. Didn't see any dents or dings on that front fender it has the HID headlamps the LED running lights front valance lower valance is an excellent condition front bumper is in the excellent condition as well didn't see any scuffs or scrapes on that. The hood is in the excellent condition the stripes are in excellent condition. Passengers side fender no dents or dings on that and the passenger side rim very very clean no scuffs or scrapes and as you go down this side of the car you can see just how mirror like that paint is how reflective and clean the body is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away or even if you're close buying just cannot make the trip down but you're still interested in purchasing the car you can still see the car hear the car and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before even get here especially with these sports cars we want to make sure that we're giving the most accurate representation possible because we sell a lot of them out of state people fly in and buy them just about every day. Back rim no scuffs or scrapes on that and the back tires have just about as much tread as front tires. Framing the underbody on this car is a really nice clean condition. You can see it has the track pack this little tube right here that's a cooler on the rear diff that indicates that it has a track pack but you can see just how clean it is underneath here that's a 29.95 option that track pack. It does have aftermarket exhaust so we have all the factory exhaust included on this car when you purchase it the actually the mufflers are in the trunk here which we'll check out in just a second but the rest of the exhaust up is we have it in storage right now but it does come with the car but really good looking exhaust tips on here super clean rear bumpers and excellent condition no dents or dings on that and the passenger side just as clean as that or the driver side just as clean as the passenger side and full disclosure this back rim absolutely perfect no scuffs or scrapes on that does have the capless fuel fill which is a nice feature and down the rest of the side of the car no dents no dings no scuffs no scrapes has the power mirrors with the built-in directional signals inside this one has the recaro seats so their leather and suede inserts you get the cobra stitched backrest the side recaro stitching and the side current airbags driver seat height adjuster back seats are very clean as well no rips or tears back there i'd be highly surprised if anybody's even sat back there it has the ambient lighting in it as well and we have the launch control the auto head lamps and as we hop inside the car here you can see that this one has 8359 miles instrument cluster is very nice and clean comes with the leather and suede wrapped steering wheel bluetooth and audio controls on the right cruise controls and information center controls on the left get the cobra the center of the steering wheel there comes with the electronics package which gives you the factory navigation this car is also equipped with a backup camera which is a nice feature dual climate control sink for your bluetooth smartphone device connection and then this is for the subwoofer that's in the back stability control trunk release and this one does have the ambient lighting like i said passenger seat and floor mat are absolutely perfect no rips or tears on that very nice clean condition and the headliner is absolutely perfect has the homelink system and your map lights right there we'll take a quick look at the back seats and then we will check out under the hood or we'll check out the trunk i should say and then under the hood so it does have that exhaust back here that's what this is that's the factory exhaust both sides and then we have the rest and storage shaker 1000 subwoofers back here and then it's got a lc2 audio control that's what that little switch in the center of the dash was has the led tail lamps and one more time as you go down this side just notice how clean the body is i would i'd give this car 9.9 out of 10 for cleanliness on the outside of the vehicle usually most gt500s have you know a rock chip or a small little ding or something this thing is just about as clean as they come under the hood we have the 5.8 liter supercharged v8 motor this one was made by kevin dean and keith erstead and built 662 horsepower if you've never driven one of these cars i highly recommend it this car has been fully safe and inspected by a service shop has a fresh oil and filter change tab been checked and topped off and this car is 100 ready to go to see more pictures of this car one of our other 450 new and used cars trucks suvs minivans wranglers sports cars you name we got to go to our website www.summitauto.com full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle on our lot videos of every single used vehicle that we have all at summitauto.com if you'd like to check out more hd videos you can go to youtube.com slash summit auto remember to like subscribe and share on this video and all the videos that you see there in fact in a second you will see a link to subscribe to our youtube channel on your left a link to more sports car videos like this one on your right if you've not been to our website on the bottom link to this vehicle on our website click those check us out and we really look forward to helping with this super clean 2013 ford shelby gt 500 mustang thanks again


From what I learned so far about Islam is that the worst of all sins would be shirk. And shirk is when you associate other gods with God or even partners with God. When you dive into polytheism away from monotheism, that would be the worst of all sins. But even if you look within Christianity, you see, of course, that the first commandment is that you should have no gods beside God. And this is the main sin, the worst of all sins. Because once you start associating partners or other gods with God, you start making everything else into God. You start defying other things. You start shifting your priority.


The best kind of doors are the doors you have to explain. All right, welcome, welcome to Unhinged. With the door door today, we do have a very special guest, Mr. Allen Lilly. Ready, all set. This is also from my trip to Eugene. We did a little weekend getaway though. This one is actually at a concert hall. So keep that in mind. Oh no, very good. All right, the concert hall. So we've got it, we've got an assembly. I've got a capacity of hopefully several hundred if it's a concert hall, otherwise it's really a concert. Yeah, no, it was, it was at least three or 400, maybe 500 capacity. So there is precisely one time that I can think of in the 20-some-one years I've been doing this, where I found this to be an acceptable answer. It was because they led to a stairwell at a mall. And so you're on the second floor of the mall and led to a stairwell. And then down at the bottom of the stairwell that we dumped out onto the street, the street was being torn up.  So the higher hazard would have been trying to get out of that stairwell once you got it. But we covered the exit signs. And we put signs up and said, the actual exit is over here. We directed traffic away from it. Not just said, hey, here's an exit. Just kidding. Okay, so I see Von Dupren concealed vertical rod. I see a really odd application of narrow style. It's the 33 or the 35 series. Concealed vertical rod always makes me happy. The rods don't get damaged. They don't get bent. They don't get hit with parts. They tend to laugh a little bit longer. So through those on the single motion egress, I would like to see a million in here. I don't know. I forget who it was. There was one of the manufacturers, many of them did a study and they took a double opening like this, right? We got two people. And they timed how long it took people to get out. Then they put a million in it. And basically what they discovered is that people aim for the center of the open. So when both doors open, despite the fact that it's a six foot opening, people will still single file it. So if you put a million in the middle, instead of one six foot open, you've got two, three foot open. And you've got a much faster method of egress. So I would like to see a million. Yeah, no, I've heard that study also. I think I heard it through foundation training. Or I don't remember where, but someone did a study and more people exit in a timely manner when a million is set in place, even though you would think it'd be counterproductive because they're blocking the way. But in reality, it just makes people go into two lines. Yeah, exactly. Right, it forces the two lines. We as a people, we aim for the center of whatever we're looking. So yes, it's a six foot wide opening, but it's actually only, it actually needs to be three feet because you're only gonna get a similar line, maybe a double line of people through, but probably not. Whereas with a million in the middle, you will absolutely get two lines of people and it will actually go faster. So that's why I would like to see a million, but that's not the end of the world. Is that a nice stand and the carpet in front of the exit? It's a piano bench. It's a piano bench. Yeah, yeah, it's a piano bench and some carpet. Yeah.  Do we know why it's no exit on the other side? I have no idea why they would not, this lead outside, I didn't go to that side of the building. Maybe they were doing construction or something out there, but from this point of view, it's an exit, but it's not an exit. This is not a door. This is not a door. If the higher heaven was on the outside of this wall, right on the outside of this building for somebody to do that construction, whatever it is. I would expect the exit sign to be covered up and I'd expect like a lot of signage, like a really big sign across the story that says go this way instead. Actually, don't even know what it would take to make that acceptable because it's an assembly hall and there's so many people that potentially could need egress. I guess you just have to make sure you had enough openings to be compliant elsewhere in the respectable area, right? Well, as a smart builder, we'll take the number of required openings and the distance between the required openings and et cetera and they'll add a safety factor or session occasion, right? So if I'm building a building and I have to have a door or I'm building comfortable and I have to have a door that would get X number, I think it's number of dozen feet or whatever, exit, 300 feet per round number. I'm going to put a door every 80 fans. It's going to cost me three more doors in the building, but it means that I can close one and still do the work. Do they all do that? No, would I do that? Yes, but they're not a bad thing.  But not everyone thinks like you, Alan. Actually, I would say you are a rare breed. Yeah, it's one of those basic code compliance issues, right? Well, the code says that we have to have nine doors, we have nine doors, yes, but if we put 11 doors in, then when something has to be closed for construction or whatever, we can still be compliant, we have a little bit more flexibility and what's an extra, what's an extra two doors on the budget line over the cost of the system? So that's, yeah, if there was a legitimate reason to have those fans, you have to be pretty convincing. That's the thing. I would want to see the end of the sign block, I would want to see big sign, and go this way instead. Not just no exit, right? Okay, so I can't leave here. So then what? What do I do? Because I'm expecting to throw a little bit of panic in there because, you know, panic at the disco and all of a sudden I have to get out. And then what? And that's how we end up with lessons learned from life. I don't want to say the club in Chicago, but I know, yeah, the one where the, the exit signs were like you couldn't see them, right? They were coming, right? Yeah, yeah. So you end up with kind of the opposite problem of that, of like people getting to the door, they can't get out, they still don't know what to do, they still don't know where to go. Like the doors work properly. Like they were, they were there, just people can find them, right? So exactly the same, exactly the same kind of sexual problem. So the hardware itself, right? The actual setup, sure, but let's not put stuff in front of it, of course.  And then the fact that the no exit is less visible than the exit also leads me to think that this is possible, probably just a, we would prefer if you don't go up this door. I would rather see emergency exit only, please use front door sign, right? That might be a more, that might be more appropriate signage for us. You no exit, no. Or maybe like some, some large man named Jeff just standing there saying, I strongly encourage you to use a different door, right? Maybe that's, maybe that's the solution. That would be a better solution than this, right? One door is mainly not blocked here. So really aren't you getting the same people out, the same number of people out the door? Except for triple that. Except for that, you're theoretically right. Theoretically speaking. In that case, there'll just be a pile of bodies on that side. So then you go out the other side, right? And then it's a clear indication of don't use that door. Don't make your issues my issues. That's a them problem, not any problem. But also Benji, you know me in an emergency, I'm going out that door. Actually, I'm probably looking out that door anyway, even not in them. And I would absolutely open that door and just to find out. It doesn't say alarm will sound. Sounds like we're investigating. Yeah, no, there's no like electrified system set up here. Yeah. Why not? Why not? Actually, people were entering one of these doors not too far away. So it's like on a wall of doors. So it makes me think they just don't want people exiting out of this entrance, even though all the other ones had no exit on it as well. Do you think something is going wrong with the latches, like the top and bottom bolt in the side that has the bench in front of it and they need it serviced? And so they don't want people messing with this particular door. Oh, it's not that deep. Okay. Why is the bench not in front of both doors? So I can just put stuff here because I'm going to put it down because people just put things down, right? I'm just going to put this down here. It's not actually a door. So it doesn't matter because it says no exit on it.  Like this is where the band unloads and they tend to idle the, they tend to idle their trumpet while they're unloading. And so if we have the door open, it lets exhaust in and then it sets off the smoke detectors, right?  And that's why they put no exit on it. Or if there is an issue with these doors and they're not latched properly, so they want to keep them latched. And so if someone exits and then it doesn't latch properly, then someone could gain access to it potentially. I don't know. There's a lot that could be happening here. And Eugene, there is a lot of roaming population, homeless population around in that area as well. This is downtown, Eugene. So potentially you could have people pulling on doors trying to look for a warm place to sleep. So... So if it is, I mean, if it's a hardware issue, fix it and then make this go away. But again, much better ways to do this. I think it's just a convenient sink. Like we just don't want you to go out this door, but... Were any of the other doors that you could see marks like this? Yeah, all of them had no exit on it. All of them? Yes, on this whole wall. There's probably, actually, there's two other sets of this same setup that said no exit. That's slightly more terrifying. Because I did a lot. And this was like just outside of like the main way that you go up into the concert hall. So people would be running down these stairs and going out, hopefully, these doors. And yeah, or they go out the other side of the entrance. But we know, Alan, I mean, we all know that we prefer, like naturally we want to go out the door that we came in unless we can't and we'll look for another exit, right? Yep, yeah. No bueno. Okay, if you were to give it a knocking score, what do you think? Oh, this is six. Six? It looks good and it theoretically functions well, but there's the human factor to this one gives me a six. Yeah. I was gonna, I am in like the six, seven range because it looks like it's good. So it's just move some stuff out, retrain. You know me. I feel like I say that every episode now. There's retraining that needs to happen. People need to know about doors. Looks like it should be an easy solution. I'm with you. I don't think it's too knocking bad. I think in the case of emergency, people would find a way out of this building. I don't think there's, it's not like it's locked or anything like that. Yeah, there's a piano bench in the way that people might trip over if they're panicking.  It's right here by the door stage. You just pick it up and take it with you. Take it with you. So not too knocking bad as far as we can tell. So I'm with you, probably a six or a seven there. Yep, I like it. All right. Well, Alan, I think this final door, if the first one really bothered you, this final door will probably, I'm sorry. If you wanna be featured on a future episode of Unhinged or if you have some pictures to submit, you can leave us a note below or you can email me at Mia at doorhardwarenerds.com.


The narcissist will exploit this quality. When you first got involved with the narcissist, they tested you, because they wanted to see what they could get away with. They wanted to see what you were going to put up with. So they gradually pushed past your boundaries. They did things that they knew you would be uncomfortable with, things that they knew would hurt or upset you, and then they fell back and studied your reactions to what they were doing. They wanted to see how you were going to respond, because that response would tell them what they will be able to get away with. It will tell them what you are willing to tolerate, and if you reacted to them in a vicious and threatening way, they would probably pull back. They would leave you alone, because a narcissist is not willingly going to put themselves in a situation that could be dangerous or harmful for them. They're cowards. They run from danger, but if you react in a way that shows tolerance or acceptance, then the narcissist is just going to run amok with you. They're going to behave in an unrestrained and out of control manner, because that's really what separates these narcissists from the rest of us. They will do whatever they think they can get away with, whatever they think you are willing to tolerate. There's no limits to what they will do to you. They lack empathy. They have no care or concern for you. They will exploit your kindness. They will use it to their benefit at your expense, because although we call ourselves humans, we are still animals, and it's survival of the fittest. Only the strongest of us will survive, while the weaker get left behind, but throughout our lives we are being taught to be kind and polite. When being nice to a narcissist really doesn't get you anywhere. Just think back throughout your relationship. I'm sure you will struggle to remember a time when being nice got you what you want.   You will be their doormat, where you're doing whatever they want whenever they want you to do it. They're just going to walk all over you. They're not going to treat you with any dignity or respect, which is why you have to develop this quality of not being nice to the narcissist, of being more aggressive. You have to put them in their place, because these narcissists have worked on this quality so if you don't work on it, they're just going to end up shutting you down.  They see it as something for them to exploit, because you were too kind to defend or protect it. It's not that you were too weak. You just weren't willing to use all of your strength to achieve what you wanted, which is why you must develop this quality of not being nice, and you must know when to use this quality. Don't be afraid of the narcissist. The truth is that they're actually more afraid of you. That's why they act that way. It's out of fear and shame, but while you may not feel fear or shame, you need to stop being so nice to the narcissist, or else they're just going to see you as a pushover. They're going to see you as someone who is easy to overcome and influence, someone who they can overpower and overwhelm. They're going to feel like they have the capacity to have an effect on your character development and behaviour, so you have to stop being nice to the narcissist, and you have to be specific about what you want or expect from them. It has to be clear so that they understand, but if it gets to the point where you're having to use this quality 24-7, you're going to be left with only one option. You're going to have to leave the narcissist because if they've done it so many times, they're going to do it again. You're going to have no choice but to get rid of them because they're completely defective. They're not willing to assimilate. They're not able to coexist with you and you can't be aggressive with them 24-7. Because then that's going to affect how you interact with other people, people who haven't done anything wrong when healthy relationships depend on politeness. But do not be afraid of the narcissist. Stand up for yourself. Don't let them push you around. Remember, they're cowards. They act this way out of their own fear. They're more afraid of you than you are of them. Thank you for watching. I hope this video resonates with you. Please like, comment, share and subscribe. If you would like to donate, my PayPal link is in the video description. Coaching Inquiries, you can email me at coaching.nats.fi.co.uk. Thank you for watching and I'll talk to you soon.


تفتحوا آدك الأيام فتا سطالح من عميدي الله زميرا من عوام والذين كانوا معهم يجب أن يفهموا أنهم لم ينظرون for خلافة وهم لم ينظرون خلافة خلافة عاليبنا بيطالب أو ترى أن خلافة عاليبنا بيطالب لا وهم لم يفهموا once criticize عاليبنا بيطالب وهم لم يفهموا ever say ولا طعنوا ولا طعنوا عليه ولا ذكروا فيه جرحاً وهم لم يفهموا ever say anything about him وهم لم يفهموا ولا بايعغا يرهو وهم لم يفهموا أمامهم من أحدهم وهم لم يفهموا أن يفهموا باستخدامنا مع أمامهم لا بطاقة أحنا في المنقص قتلنا لك this when عثمان برو عفان got sieged in his house who got sieged عثمان was sieged in his house he said at that time when عثمان was in his house I went to طلح من العميدي الله أحنا في المنقص يساين I went to طلح من العميدي الله أحنا في المنقص يساين and I asked them that I said to them ما تأمرني what do you guys order me as for verily I see عثمان as a dead man عثمان is killed he's gonna go عثمان is gone what do you guys advise me and they said to me طلح من العميدي الله عثمان عوان both said to me عليك باعليين if عثمان is killed علي is the one he said that I went to عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها and I said to her بعد قتل عثمان when عثمان was killed after عثمان was killed عائشة he asked her in Mecca he said to her what do you tell me what do you say to me what should I take قالت عائشة تم عليك باعليين stick to علي this is after عثمان was killed so what does that show us it shows us the position that عائشة طلح من العميدي الله عوام all three had against regarding who all three of them had regarding علي was what that he was the legitimate خليفة للمسلمين and they weren't arguing in that matter بعركة جميل hasn't taken place yet عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها علي's got 10,000 men army he directed towards طلح من عميدي الله and who and زبين من عوام and زبين من عوام علي he sent sorry علي sent sir and he said المقداد ابن الأسود والقاعة قاع ابن عمر both of them when he sent both of them to speak to طلحة and زبين to speak to them مقداد and قاعة قاع they agreed from one angle and طلح من عميدي الله زبين من عوام agreed from the other side to not fight one another 10,000 men of علي نبي طالب and them not to fight and they all agreed upon what that it's what and now لا يجوزوا تركوا قتلة عثمان and it's not permissible to leave off those who are killing عثمان they all agreed when مقداد listened to the points that طلح من عميدي الله and he suggested he said is it all you guys want the people who killed عثمان is that all you guys want you guys are not arguing about what you guys are not arguing about خلافة and علي and you criticize علي whatsoever they said yes there's no problem with علي the issue is who killed عثمان where are they how are they just running for free نعم so then طلحة and مقداد ابن الأسود قعقائبنا عمر and we also agree with you وعليون but علي he sees that it's not from the right now it's not a تتبع قتلة عثمان right now the following the ones who killed him should not be followed up not now حتى حتى تستيبو حتى حتى تستيبو حتى الأمور تنهر تستيبو فاقات فاقات قتلة عثمان Among all the killing of those who killed عثمان is agreed upon there's no dispute about the خلاف is what وكتلاف انما هو في الوقت that's it that's all after both armies agreed نام الجيشاني بخيري they slept the best night they could sleep كنت سليب. وبأت السبائية. السبائية هو السبائية عبدالله ابن سبق اليهوديه. انه هي جروب. وانشاء الله سوف نتوقف عن السبائية. وانشاء الله سوف نتوقف عن السبائية. هو السبائية. They are the ones who killed Usman.  Usman. They slept like in what? بشر لي ليلة. The worst night was for them. Why? لأنه تم الاتفاق عريب. Because the agreement came together and they had no place to get in. And that is what the historians, the مؤرخون. The reliable storytellers who have told us stories who have narrated history to us. That's what they've mentioned. Such as Al-Imab al-Tabari, Ibn al-Kathir, Ibn al-Afir, Ibn al-Hazm. Ibn al-Tabari, رحم الله, he mentions in his tarikh. Third volume, page 500 and 570. Ibn al-Kathir mentions it in his Bida'i and Nihaya. Ibn al-Afir, رحم الله تعالى, he mentions it in his Al-Kabir in the tarikh. Ibn al-Hazm, رحم الله, in his book Al-Fisal. في الميلال والأهوائي والنحل. So that's what is mentioned. Then what did, what happened? The Saba'iyah are a group from the Rafid and the Shia. أجمعات السبائيون. All the Saba'iyun came together. Abdullah Ibn Saba, his followers, they came together. رأيهم على ألا يتم هذا الاتفاق. That they're going to work hard, that this agreement doesn't happen. So what's the solution? They said in the morning, like early morning, what do we have to do? Some of the points mentioned now at night, whilst everybody's sleeping, late what we're going to do is, and everybody's sleeping, that we're going to send what? A group to fight both parties at the same time, simultaneously. Both parties. جيش, our group are going to fight with who? طلحب العبيد العلم. Fight and throw arrows at them. And the next one is going to, a group is going to go to who? عليب نبي طالب and his army and also throw arrows and things at them. What happened? Everyone is sleeping. They get shot. Things happen. They really see it at us, what? That the other party deceived and lied to them. عليب نبي طالب and his party saw that طلحب العبيد العلم وخائنين, deceitful individuals. They lied to us. That's what happened. And عليب نبي طالب's army, طلحب العبيد العلم, so army and Ali's army, what? As أهل غدر, people of deceit. That's what they wanted. And the reality isn't the case. That's how they made the fitness stand. And the كيبار, the people who are wise from the Sahabas, they tried to stop the battle. But no one was able to succeed in that issue. طلحب العبيد العلم يقول أيها الناس تنسطون فأصبح لا ينسطون فقال أفن أفن فراش نار وذباب طبعين. طلحب العبيد العلم يقول to the people, oh people, are you guys going to what? Are you guys going to stop this? Are you guys going to just hold back from what you guys are doing? And then he said, of, of, Ali on the other side, he's doing what? He's stopping his army. He's saying don't fight. عائشة رضي الله تعالى عنها. She sent كعببن صورة. كعببن صورة. She sent him with a moushaf so he can stop the battle. They grabbed him when he took the moushaf. كعببن صورة. They grabbed him and they killed him straight away. And they threw him on the ground so he couldn't go. The battle, the matter became very serious. And Imam Al-Bukhari, رحم الله, he mentioned in his صحيح, in his صحيح, the three lines of poetry regarding when a fitna takes place, there isn't anyone who can stop it once the spark of fitna starts. And this poetry is taken from the pre-Islamic جاهلية امر القيس. امر القيس, between him and the Prophet, جيس الله عليه السلام is approximately 150 years of duration. And he's from the first of the معلقات. He's from the first one of them. نعم. امر القيس, he said, الحرب أول ما تكون فتيتا تسعى بزينتها ليكون لجهولي. حتى إذا اشتعلت وشبض ضرامها ولا تعجوز غير ذات حليلي. شطماء ينكر لونوها وتغيرت بكروهة للشم والتقبيل. ويقولت لهم بطل. عندما يأتي بأول مكان هي كبيرا جميل. ويأتي بكبير ويأتي بكبير. معها المنطقة من الذين يتعلمون ويأتي بكبيرها. يرىها في جميلة جميلة. فتنة عندما يأتي بأول مكان ويأتي بكبيرها. ماذا يحدث؟ ماذا يحدث؟ هل يحدث بكبيرا جميلة؟ يجب على جميعها. المشاكل يمتلون على فتنة. فتنة حتى إلى شتعلة وشبض راموها. لكن عندما يأتي بكبيرها يأتي بكبيرها. كما يحدث في فتنة عندما يأتي بكبير. ويحدث. يحدث. ماذا يحدث؟ وليت عجوزا غيرا ذات حليلي. يصبح فتنة جميلة. هل ترىها لما يحدث؟ يصبح فتنة جميلة ويأتي بكبيرها. فتنة now you realize it when it's turned back at you. You now realize it. سبحان الله. ما حدث هذا؟ وفي هذه الوقت نحن نقل مع فتنة. شطماء ينكروا لو نهوها وتغيرها.  Her color changes. وما حدث بقروها تلشمي وتقبيري. She's not befitting. She's an individual. You will not want to touch. You will not want to kiss her. The smell that comes from it is so bad. And that's what happens to the fitna. Later people understand. شيخو الإسامي بلوتي ميسر. والفتنة إذا وقعت عجز العقلاء وفيها عن دفع شفها. When the fitna hits the people who are intellectual individuals they become unable to push away the dignity, the ignorant ones who want the fitna to go. They can't stop them. They can't. فصار الأكابر عجزينة عن اطفاع الفتنة. So the elders, the smart ones, the intellectual individuals they become weak from extinguishing the fire of fitna. وكفي أهلها. وهذا شأنوا الفتنة. And that is the affairs of the fitna. كما قالت عالى أزال الله said والتقو فتنة لا تصيبنا الذين ظلموا منكم. لا تصيبنا الذين ظلموا منكم خاصة. وعلموا أن الله شديد العقاب. الله said والتقو فيها فتنة a trial and a tribulation. لا تصيبنا الذين ظلموا. It will not only afflict those who are the wrongdoers amongst you alone. That's not. The trial and tribulation goes to everybody else. وعلموا أن لا أن الله شديد العقاب إذا الله استفعه in his punishment. So إملتي مجددا إنه مرحج سنة النبوية. So معركة الجمل It took place. معركة الجمل It took place. في سنة ستين وثلاثين من الهدوة. When did it happen? It happened the 36th Hijriah. And this was when في بداية خلافة علية. This was right at the beginning of the beginning of the al-Khilafa. And it started after what? بدأت بعد الظهر. It started after the Dhuhr prayer. وانتهت قويلة مغيب الشمسي وانتهت قبل الشمسي لأسين داية عالي كان معه ماذا؟ 10.000 أرمان والأشخاص من المنزل عائشة أنطلحوا من عبيدللانهم المنزل كان من ماذا؟ 5.000-6.000 عالي من عبيدللانهم محمد من عبيدللانهم كان معه والأشخاص من جمالهم كانوا عبدالله مزوير ومثل من المسلمين يقتلون ذلك إنه فتنة أخواني الله تعالى وإتعالى لقد تساعدنا منها لذا نسأل الله ماذا؟ ونسأل الله الرضلانا والمغفرة ونسأل الله التبارك وإتعالى ونسأل الله أن يكون معنا ونسأل لنا لأي شيء لدينا كل شيء أيضا، طلحة من عبيدللانهم زوبير ونعوام were killed طلحة was killed وزوبير was killed محمد من الطلحة was also killed as for زوبير he did not even participate in the fight زوبير ونعوام and also طلحة من عبيدلان didn't participate in the battle the story of زوبير ونعوام is mentioned by إبن أبي شيب and his Musannaf that also إبن حجر mentioned in his مطالب العالية in the train of narration of course there is a man who is unknown but the point is that زوبير did not participate ولا طلحة من عبيدلان it was said to زوبير ونعوام when the fight started لما جاء إلى المعركة when the fight started زوبير ونعوام زوبير ونعوام and عليب ونعبيدلطالب and عليب ونعبيدلطالب said to زوبير ونعوام اتذكروا do you remember that the messenger said to قاتل وعليب and you are going to fight وانت ظالمون and you are the transgressor the wrong dua زوبير ونعوام as soon as he heard that he went back did that really take place between him and عليب ونعبيدلطالب الله وعالم because there is no chain of narration that is authentic that is strong that points here and I just said to you the chain of narration that was mentioned by عبيدلطالب there is a weak narrator in there زوبير so he didn't participate when was he killed زوبير was killed by the feet he was deceived زوبير ونعوام the man who killed him زوبير ونعوام was ابن جرموز ابن جرموز killed him he deceived him and he killed him طلح ابن عبيدلله he was killed بسه مغرب what does that mean he was killed by an arrow that wasn't intended for him an arrow that wasn't intended نعم is what hit him when the battle finished and the fight was over عليب ونعبيدلطالب but in reality if we analyze that word no one got victory no one gained victory but rather Islam and the Muslims found lost in that battle after the battle and the fight was over عليب ونعبيدلطالب was going through and he was walking through the dead corpse of the people and he found طلح ابن عبيدلله he found him and عليب ونعبيدلطالب sat him down and he wiped the the death of his face and then he said عزيز ونعالية وراك مجدلا تحت نجوم السماء يا أبا محمد he said it is very hurtful towards me for me to see you killed like this his head was between two rocks طلح ابن عبيدلله for me to see you under the stars of the sky يا أبا محمد يا أبا محمد يا أبا محمد and then he said وديت أني مدت قبل هذا بعشين سنة I wish I died 20 years before this علي said I wish I died 20 years before this took place and he also saw محمد ابن طلحة and he cried محمد ابن طلحة محمد ابن طلحة used to be called السجادي and the reason why he was called السجادي was because عبادة he used to always be found in صلاح عبادة علي ابن عبيدلله wasn't the only one who regretted it rather every Sahabi who participated in it all of them without any exception they all regretted it for example ابن جرموز who killed زبير he walked on to who he came out to علي ابن عبيدلله and he had his and he had the sword of with him يقوله he said قتلت زبير I killed زبير علي علي I killed زبير قتلت زبير علي ابن عبيد طالب and he said to him إنه هذا السيف طالما فرج الكرب عن رسول الله that's all you have how many times has he eased sadness from the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم if for the sake of this religion that you just take it like that and then he said he said to him بشر God tied into you قاتل the killer of ابن صافية بن نار the son of صافية his mother زبير was his mother صافية who was the prophet's auntie صافية بنت عبيد طالب بنت عبد المطالب قلت هينيس for you how fire and he said don't enter into my house leave me don't let him in when the battle was over علي ابن عبيد طالب he went to أمنا عائشة رضي الله he went to her and he prepared for her a what he prepared for her a good riding beast to take her back to to take her back to مدينة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم and he did this based on the command of the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم the prophet commanded him to do this and this hadith is collected by المام البخاري رحم الله ابن حجر he considered it to be حسن that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم he said to he said to عائن علي ابن عبيد طالب سيكون بينك وبين عائشة أمرون there's going to take place between you and عائشة أي ماتا something's going to happen between you and عائشة علي then was with the prophet and he said to the prophet فألأشقاهم يا رسول الله I am the one who is destroyed that day عائشة are arguing that I'm the destroyed one then the prophet said لا ولكن but إذا كان كذلك the prophet said to him no but if that does take place فردتها إلى منها take her back to her place take her back to her place her house send her back and علي ابن عبيد طالب did as the prophet requested from him صلى الله عليه وسلم إما محمد narrated it in his in his musnad the question that arises now is لماذا لم يقتل علي قتلت عثمان why didn't علي kill those who assassined عثمان رضي الله تعالى عنه why didn't علي ابن عبيد طالب just get it over and done with and kill the people who killed the عثمان the reason is because علي رضي الله تعالى عنه he saw مصلاحة المفسد in the matter and that's what he was looking into عثمان was looking علي was looking into the مصلاحة and the مفسد and he saw that the مصلاحة is in تأخير القصاص لا تركوا that we don't let these people go the قصاص the capital punishment we delay it for now until matters become controlled the situation comes down so he delayed it for that reason and the احتهد that علي based his action on was exactly what the prophet did in the matter of what حديثة افك the issue the forged accusation that was placed our mother عائشة some people spoke about عائشة from those who spoke about عائشة is the notebook company حساني بروثابت وحملة ومصطح ابن وثاثة and other than then were the ones who participated in what in the phase of عائشة but the one who took over the biggest matter the one who started of the story who is the head of this situation was who عبدالله ابن أبي ابن صلول the messenger climbed the pulpit and look what he said he said من يعظوني في رجل وصل أذاه إلى آهلي the messenger said who is the person who will excuse an individual a man whose harm has reached my family his harm my family who is the individual who is going to deal with him meaning عبدالله ابن أبي ابن صلول صعد ابن معاذن he stood up and then he said أنا أعظورك منه يا رسول الله I am the one who suffice you from him إن كان مننا معشرة الأوس if he is from us the people of Aus قتل الله we will kill him وإن كان من إخوانينا الخزرج and if he is from our brothers خزرج أمرتنا بقتله order us he is killing we will kill him صعد ابن عباد that stood up and he replied back to who? صعد ابن معاذن and he replied معاذن sorry and he said to him you are not you can't dare to do that when صعد ابن عباد that said that وصيد ابن حضير who is on the side of صعد ابن معاذن replied back to صعد ابن عباد and he said to him you are a منافق you are a hypocrite and you argue for the hypocrites you are a spokesman for the hypocrites the messenger what he do عليه الصلاة والسلام صار النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يخفضهم the prophet started to cool down the situation so from this situation the prophet realized عليه الصلاة والسلام this matter is a very very very deep situation and the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم as we are all aware of before he came to Medina our messenger Aus and Khazraj they all agreed as a tribe and they were fighting they all agreed on what they all agreed to place عبد الله ابن أبي ابن صلال as their king they were actually placing the crown on him they already agreed so for them he has a high status and who is عبد الله ابن صلال he took one third of the army of battle of he said if we knew there was a fight we would have participated the prophet here عليه الصلاة والسلام what did he do he left off the whipping of عبد الله ابن أبي ابن صلال the prophet left it why did he leave it للمصلحة there's benefit in it because the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم saw that if he whipped عبد الله ابن أبي ابن صلال the man who was being given this guy is the head of the tribe the prophet saw in it جلده أعظم leaving him and hitting him right now leaving him is better and there's more benefit in it and the same was with عليه عليه صوء the delaying of the قصاص the capital punishment was less delaying than hastening من تعجيله to hasten the capital punishment for them because عليه ابن أبي طالب رضي الله و تعالى عنه who knew he wasn't able to kill what he wasn't able to kill those who killed Usman why? because they were what لأنهم غيرا معروفين بأعيانهم nobody knew who they were individually nobody did but they were what they were heads that were known icons individuals who were known but the individuals who took the hand of Usman and killed him weren't really known and they also have what لهم قبائن to dafir عنهم they have tribes that are backing them up نعم


Good evening all my fans thank you right so I'm Aisha I am a front-end engineer at Vicky so today I'll be talking about something that it's quite unfamiliar to me as well it's I'll be breaking down SVG animations with you but this is not really about SVG this is more about animation and I don't really care about the technical stuff I just want to get into the fun stuff of animation actually so without further ado when I first started working with animations actually it was it was a slightly scary thing and it's because of three reasons because I don't really have the fundamental when it comes to SVG animations or any types of animations actually the only fundamentals that I have that I could actually use for this personal project of mine was a user interface animation which is not really that different when you translate it into something much more complex which we will talk about later and the second is it's very difficult for me to visualize animation see I don't really have the best imagination I don't have art background I don't really draw and the only reason I can draw is because of illustrator I can cheat a lot with illustrator actually because I can correct the lines I can correct colors very easily but don't tell me to draw on canvas I cannot do that and thirdly it's it's unfamiliar territory and I've never I don't really work with SVG on my on a daily basis so it's mostly just JavaScript CSS when SVG is when I first read about it it's a different different warp it's not that difficult but there's some concept that you need to be able to grasp before you would be able to use it effectively and so this is a story of zero to hero okay where I start with no animation experience at all into making something that I'm quite proud of so this is something that I created recently it is actually a visualization itinerary of my recent trip to New Zealand and as you can see it's actually a itinerary of it's basically a travel blog on steroids where I basically tell you where I went and basically represent the area that I went with icons and I put a little bit of blurbs of my experience there it's actually incomplete it's incomplete because Quijing right there actually forced me to speak about it today so I had to actually just deploy whatever I have because I had plans to actually put pictures of pictures of me and like in order to represent the place even better yes that's what we've been taught me today and so I'm going to be walking all of you to the process that I had to go through in order to work on this like I said zero to hero anybody can do this if I can do this y'all can do it too so first things first so if any of you are interested in looking at the code or more of the animations provided here you can go to this site I put all of the animations there so you can check out the code easily I will not be presenting code today you know it's not my specialty so okay so the first thing when you when you start with something that is really new right one of the things that scares you the most is you know you don't you don't really know where to start so the only advice that I have for you is look at the fundamentals of animation and like I mentioned before my specialty was you know I'm a UI engineer basically so I've animate UI stuff and as you can see there's some basic animation properties that you can look into like rotate scale opacity and translate and this is something that usually CSS engineers will be familiar with right on a daily basis you work with this so animation for UI is actually pretty simple and it's something that we're familiar with so for example oh the image is not loading okay so you'll have something like this which you you only need to animate one property which is the scale property in order to make sure that you know it it works nicely it animates nicely and also for certain animations there will be cases where you need to combine animations right in this case you need to combine animations where that is not just scale you'll combine say for example with and a bit a little bit of translate when you're over so this is UI animation basically and it's what I deal with on a daily basis what about cartoons and characters though is it the same well yeah you can say so for example if you have something like this which is just a simple animation of a sheep rotating its head side to side it's very simple you can think of it as just rotate left and right right so it's just one animation property and there's also other complex animation which you can combine those animation properties just like the UI animation method that I talked about we before you can actually combine them to create interesting effects like for example smoke effects like this I don't know if you can see it but there's supposed to be a smoke like a chimney smoke there and this is a who's a lot of the ring fans here any Lord of the Rings fans okay right okay this is the shire okay in New Zealand you get to see this sorry okay so well you can see actually in New Zealand you can see this in Mata Mata place in New Zealand so anyway so how did I understand how to manage how to actually how do I understand the connection from the you from UI animation into something as complex as this right well this is where the oldest trick in learning comes into use which is we learn by doing and then we watch and learn and then we observe and so my inspiration comes from a block by David Walsh David Walsh actually I don't know whether it's David Walsh but it is in his block so so I saw this some oh that's interesting the animation didn't work properly here okay but this is not mine by the way so you have that so I got the and it was supposed to look like an explosion and it is a combination of opacity and scale and when I look at the cause oh it's interesting this is actually something that I'm quite familiar with you know some some smoky things I could do that so I decided to just adapt this and I did a little bit something different to make it look like a chimney smoke I'll combine just like David Walsh it was kale and a pasty but I combined a little another animation property which is translate that could actually make sure that the smoke gives like it's going up kind of effect yeah so that's basically how I achieve that smoky look all right now however I mean we don't live in a utopia not everything is easy for us to animate unfortunately right so like I said like my second problem was I don't really know how to visualize like I don't really have the best imagination in the world you know if I do I'll probably be a game designer by now reading would know all right so but how do you actually visualize right when it comes to animating something much more complex I'm not talking about smokes but I'm talking about animating limbs for example and I'm talking about animals you know animating animals walking or animals eating how do we do that so this is where prototyping animation could come in handy but how do we put it on you should you know how to protect your did like prototype your design by basically using sketch or Photoshop but is there a good way to put it up animation well it's a bit of a hack so this is an example that I have when I try to visualize the animation that I want to do what I want to do here is I want to animate the sheep eating a grass so what I do is basically I just select the head right select the head and I want to imagine that okay I want I want this sheep to be eating something so what I do is I move it down a little bit and then I rotate so when I rotate I notice that oh that looks like the sheep is not nodding not really eating something so let's just you know rotate it a little bit more down so that it actually looks real like it's eating and then we just translate it again further down to make it look believable so why is this important right it's important because so that when you first look at your animation the way you approach it you don't really approach it in terms of thinking about the code right you think about it in terms of visualizing it first you want to visualize how am I going to do this so once you have a clear visual visualization you can actually translate that visualization into code in this case it's very easy for me now I know what I'm going I want I know that I'm going to translate it down by a few pixels and then I rotate it a little bit by a few pixels and then I'll just repeat so basically in terms of animating lips it is best to separate the things that you want to animate in illustrator and this is what we've achieved see where the sheep is actually eating something and I put it on loop so I don't really have to bother sometimes people don't notice that I mean I animate things I just want it to be on loop and just like I mentioned before if you want to look at code it's actually a little code like here it's not it's not even that much see so it shouldn't be that intimidating so all right so thirdly it's unfamiliar territory but here's the best part about unfamiliar territory right you can go crazy and combine those fundamentals I remember talking to one of my mentors before about the beginners mindset especially people who are not familiar who are in unfamiliar territory the best thing about beginners mindset is that you don't really think about the impossibility you don't really think about oh this is hard because you don't really know what could go wrong you don't you don't really have knowledge about oh is this the right thing to do is this a right way to do it or you don't really have that mindset of huh this is this is not the right way to go as a beginner you every way is bad valid way basically and so I have a question today who can guess what animation property that I use okay you have translate rotate scale and opacity I'm not talking about the smoke I'm talking more about this guys are here whoever can answer will get chocolates anyone please take a stab translate okay how do I make it vibrate right that's correct get the man the chocolate sorry I'm not gonna do it I'm giving the talk all right so so that's correct it is it is translate so what I did was I just translate it up and down by two pixel two pixel negative two and then I just speed it up by point five saying you get that vibration animation is it the right way to do it I don't know maybe not but who cares okay so my conclusion is that animation is not that scary all right if I can do it anyone can do it and I hope that my talk today this not so technical talk of mine will give any one of you the courage and the motivation to try out things that you would not have tried out before all right whether it be it animation or not and so that's all I have for you thank you and if you have any questions feel free to ask don't be shy all right that's a good question so this morning so basically I actually load it with Ajax so basically I load all of those symbols with Ajax and then I prepend it on my HTML all right this is initially how I want to do it so it's it's faster and I can cache those files the problem with inline SVG is it's difficult to cache right but with Ajax you if you if you load your SVG with Ajax and it be pended then you can cache those files so that's what I plan to do that was initially my plan but this morning I had to deploy to code pen to do this demo and so I for this one yes you're right I inline it there's no preloading yeah it's just in line inlining SVG other than Ajax there's a way to preload I think there is I think there is but I'm not so sure yeah so we need to load too much so many images no it's actually it's not image SVG is actually paths yeah so it's not really loading those images but it's loading those path and it there are okay so there are ways to actually optimize your SVG so basically I didn't talk much about the technical part today but probably I should have but there are ways to optimize your SVG in terms of optimizing the path in order to make sure that your code is small right that's one way so of course with SVG you're gonna get one large file if you do not know how to optimize correctly but if you can I can I enter a site that I could show one of the sites that I go to to optimize my SVG is called SVG O yeah SVG O actually helps you to optimize your SVG file to make it as small as possible what it does is it's tripped out all of those unnecessary things on your on your SVG file basically for example ID I think they could actually shorten the ID names for example to make sure that the file size is small and one one way is that yeah you can see the features here which can choose how to you can either purify your code to make sure you minify it with a smaller file size yeah so this is SVG optimization in itself is a topic on its own yeah so if you're interested to know more about SVG optimization I suggest you check out articles from Sarah's we done she's I think of her as the SVG queen she's really good at these okay but in some browser the colors some some transparent colors and I'm not supported right right I mean that different yeah check your paths and also I noticed that when you have shadows it didn't work well if you have shadows gradients work well but not shadows yeah yeah yeah I guess catch is a really good tool as well yeah yeah if you use a phone in that in your SVG that is not a system phone you run the risk that it will not render correctly because then it depends on the phone being installed on your users computer so like what Chris said you would convert it to path but if you convert it to path your file size would become much bigger so you need to keep that into consideration another alternative is to serve your phone as a web phone and you confirm you'll be able to get it and you will get the savings from SVG as well so there's a bit more work in there but at the end so for example the funds loaded correctly but the size right whenever in the SVG the text is inside the rectangle means in the browser after rendering the text might be larger than the rectangle you might want to check your the SVG file itself because at the end of the day SVG you can debug your SVG in the browser especially if you use like Chrome Firefox is also pretty good now you use and they were actually pretty fight for you or even if it's compressed and then you can actually hover to see exactly what what goes what is happening and the properties that are applied to that particular element of the SVG that you are highlighting to see exactly what we're known because it doesn't really translate directly the if especially if it's font size inside the SVG and when it's rendered in the browser I don't think it's the same it shouldn't be the same but it I don't think it's like 16 points in your SVG may not be 16 points in the browser you will probably need to double check that there's always a bit tricky the rules SVG fonts in your SVG yeah lady behind the question right right right right right so one of the difference that I found is it is very it's easier for me to style and inline SVG but when I embed it in some other way it might be hard for me to control it even with CSS you see so this is why ultimately inlining is preferable but like you said yes inlining could be very messy but we have a method where we can actually use you have you heard using SVG as rights before no okay so basically okay so when you go to the right and another thing that I want to say is in terms of controlling the messiness is to actually reuse your icons right so basically these and these and these are actually icon views it's not like a new SVG file or anything it's actually reuse we use you can search for SVG symbol to to learn how to reuse your SVG and this is good this is also another optimization solution that you can look into actually by using symbols instead of actually putting paths one by one because that could get messy and it'll make your file size bigger so using symbols is one of the ways to make it less messy right thank you no problem I also want to shout out a book on SVG animations that's really good it's by Sarah Dresner just got released very very recently very comprehensive book if you're really interested in SVG animations and you really want to get into it it's very accessible meaning it doesn't assume that you know a lot of things already but at the end of the book you'll be pretty great with books kids don't ask hard ones sorry oh it's from this side I forgot I'll share it with you it's a it's a site with open source SVG maps of all of the world so yeah I can give it to you yeah you will be in a show notes after the fact when the videos are published and stuff follow us on social media yes yeah the only thing I did optimize was my SPG oh yeah yeah so for for for the New Zealand map I actually downloaded the lease file size all right that's the first thing I did and the second thing I did is when I was illustrating with sketch and no illustrator mainly because illustrated easier to actually optimize better optimization so I make sure that I follow a few articles that actually teach me how to optimize my SPG further so I actually optimize the symbols and all which you are they were the engine for it's right yeah that's true that's okay because everybody had a lot of questions right thank you somebody else needs to give me an SVG talk okay if you are my friend you will be eventually forced to talk he's a miracle that I see my friends but that's not the point the point is even one day you all will be sitting here and talking also because Chris and I are running out of things to talk about yes yeah they will come first time here so yeah but anyway we've got a lot of stickers if you are interested in stickers and you can come and like look at my mascot but you cannot have him because he's mine thank you so much thank you so much for being wonderful audience


Meanwhile, the Ministry of Health and Wellness on Sunday, January 24, 2021 received confirmation from the Caribbean Public Health Agency, CAFRA, of five cases of the SARS-CoV-2 British variant diagnosed in country. Two of the cases are British nationals who were diagnosed on December 17 and December 23, 2020, while the other three cases are St. Lucia Nationals from the Denry, Miku and Barbano districts who were all diagnosed in December 2020. All five cases have made a full recovery from the COVID-19 virus. Chief Medical Officer Dr. Sharon Melmar George. The identified strain had been in circulation from September 20, 2020, within the United Kingdom. The virus has since been detected in Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium and Australia, but the risk of importation into the Caribbean and the rest of the world was rated as high due to incoming travel from the United Kingdom and Europe. Cases of this new strain have since been confirmed in several Caribbean islands, including Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica. It is known and expected that all viruses constantly change over time. As such, it had been anticipated that this would also obtain if the COVID-19 virus. Studies conducted in the United Kingdom on this new variant of the virus suggest that it increases the rate of which the virus spread. This is estimated as increasing as much as up to 70%. The United Kingdom has noted increased levels of transmission and spread in the areas where the variant SARS-CoV-2 strain has been found. However, there is no evidence at this point of more severe cases associated with the new variant or reducing the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. This new situation, according to the Chief Medical Officer, further emphasises the need for strict adherence to all protocols recommended thus far and to ensure increased vigilance at all levels where risk has been identified. CARFA is the regional reference lab with the capacity to perform gene sequencing for the region and does gene sequencing for the variant for all its member states. At the recently convened meeting, the organisation urged member states to ensure strict adherence to the current regional and national guidelines on COVID-19 prevention and control. The European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed the following. There are no reports of worse clinical outcomes. The level of mortality remains the same. The effect on the population groups affected remains the same. On Monday, December 21, 2020, the Caribbean Public Health Agency hosted an emergency meeting with PAHO, WHO, OECS, and the Chief Medical Officers of the region to discuss the new risk by this new variant. It was further confirmed that the COVID-19 PCR testing being done in countries remains the gold standard to ensure accurate diagnosis within the mutations and the vaccine approved by the Food and Drug Administration remains as relevant. The recommendations made are in relation to the strict adherence to the current regional and national guidelines on COVID-19 prevention and control. CARFA allows countries to send an allocation of 10 samples per week, which meets the requirements for gene sequencing for testing. The process of gene sequencing has a turnaround time of 3 to 4 weeks.


Welcome back to Building Tomorrow, a podcast dedicated to all things tech and innovation from a libertarian perspective. I'm your host, Paul Matzko, and with me is Aaron Powell. We are returning to part two of an interview with John Aristotle Phillips, the founder of Predictit, the aptly named political prediction market, and the college student formerly known as the A-bomb kid. Yep, sometimes the truth actually is stranger than fiction. Because if teenage designer of nuclear bomb who creates a betting market for politics isn't the best plot summer you've heard for an as yet unmade Coen Brothers film, I don't know what it is. But back to the show. I know there's a relationship between, I think Aristotle was involved with some of the planning for Predictit, which is a political prediction market, but it's based in New Zealand, Alvin New Zealand University. Explain a little bit about that. Sure. That's my favorite subject. This is of more than three decades in the business of politics. This is something to which I've contributed that I am proudest of. Predictit is just the coolest thing.  Are you guys Predictit traders? We have some here in, I think in the building. Sounds like a lot personally. You guys are definitely on Predictit. Predictit is what's called a prediction market. It's like a stock market where you buy and sell $1, winner take all shares where two people, we put two people together, one person who thinks something's going to happen, the other person who doesn't think this thing is going to happen. Let's just take Trump impeachment as an example. So right now you can buy a share, a single share of Trump to be impeached in 2019. I don't know if it's maybe selling for $0.22. That means if you put down $0.22 that says Trump will be impeached in 2019, you get a dollar if it happens. Or you can take the other side of that bet and you can put down $0.78 that says he won't be impeached in 2019 and you get the dollar if he is not impeached.  You're limited to $850 in any market, can't buy more than $850 in a market. And what's cool about it is the price fluctuates by the second. So there are thousands and thousands of people who are holding these $1 winner take all contracts and they're watching the news and engaging in trying to figure out in this case will Trump be impeached in 2019. And as the likelihood of Trump being impeached increases or decreases, so does that $0.22 share. It goes up in value, goes down in value based upon people bidding on it 24-7, 365. So that's predicted. And it's not an original idea to Aristotle. Prediction markets have been around a while. Robin Hansen proposes them back in the 90s. Intrade was a famously fun, but also eventually shut down by the Kamai's Future Trading Commission. It was an Irish gambling site. But making predictions or people think of the stock market sometimes is gambling. There's a lot of research that goes into whether you're going to buy a share and there's a lot of thinking that goes in research that goes into whether or not you think impeachment is going to happen or what you think the margin of victory is going to be or how many Senate seats the Republicans are going to pick up or the Democrats are going to pick up. All those things factor in. And what's fascinating about predicted to me anyway is that they're so darn accurate. They're not 100%. It's not 2020 vision into the future, but you're pulling back these curtains just a little bit. You're able to see a little bit through the fog and that's what prediction markets do. And the question is why? Robin Hansen and others have been researching prediction markets for a long time. And the question really is why are markets accurate predictors of future events? How is it that is it wisdom of crowds as some people would like you to believe? Is it insider information coming into the market and causing the price to go up or go down on something like this? What is it about it? We know that markets are efficient are highly efficient at distilling billions of pieces of information. We can be talking about pork bellies or orange juice futures or the price of Tesla stock. Okay. But we're happy to talk about great trading places references. That's nice. So but they distilled billions of pieces of information and these are generally about risk and value and that distills it into odds and prices. And that's what a market does. It's what a stock market does. So this is if you think of this as a market for politics where you can make all kinds of predictions and you can put your money where your mouth is. And then of course there's this whole comments board. You know we have more than a million comments for instance on some of these markets. It's great and it's great fun. And I still think you guys are traders. You're just not saying it. So this question of accuracy. So predicted is a large portion of the data behind the website electionbettingodds.com which was the it was like it in 538 in 2016 and then again this year where the everyone in DC is obsessively hitting reload on these two sites. But one of the things about giving a percentage happening of a one-time event like will Trump or Clinton win the election. That's a one-time event. And so if predicted says that Trump has a 3% chance of winning and he wins then predicted was still right. And if predicted says that Trump has a 75% chance of winning and he wins you'd still say it was right because these are like one time you can't repeat it to see you know out of 100 times running this election he won you know either 97 or he won. Because you said because there's no way to empirically test. Right and so so when you're talking about its accuracy how are you getting to the question of its accuracy if you're always in these kind of one-off things. Well that's the old gag about Washington everybody says it's a 60% chance that something's going to happen with that way you're right in either way no matter what happens. So when we think of accuracy first of all the premise of the question is 100% correct in my opinion. When you say something is 20% chance that it's going to happen you know that means you know 20% of the time that thing is supposed to happen right and the other times it's not supposed to happen because you can't repeat it and all this stuff. So what how do you calculate accuracy well there's something called Brier score which is what you know people study prediction marks like it's not just being it's not just the odds are correctly cited with what actually happens but how long in advance of the event and and for how long it's okay because there's there's a virtue to being right five minutes before the event to be on the right side of a bet five minutes before the event occurs but the greater virtue is being right on the right side of that same bet six months ago when you could have bought this share when everybody else was thinking the opposite was going to happen. So you know there are there are biases that enter into it when you're you know there's long shot bias there's all kinds of bias that and it's fascinating how investors think about these things and I'm not here to tell you I figured out how why why markets are as accurate I gave you my theory but you know I think it's probably a combination of things I think in I think information flows into the market rapidly they are obsessively people are obsessively you know hitting the website trying to figure out if the odds are going to change it's what's really interesting is you follow something like the Kavanaugh nomination you know hearings or that Kavanaugh would even be picked in the first place and you can really really see the market start to tip at various points almost in advance of what's going on in terms of the testimony and and and you also you know it's not just it's not just politics of course I mean if you can predict how interesting would it be to predict you know the the the month and the year or just the year when the first human being is going to walk on mars you know all that's all that stuff is like really subject to and and again you know prediction markets and markets in general and and forecasting elections it's gone on for a long with money behind it it's gone on a long long time like hundreds of years you said that there's a was an eight hundred and fifty dollar cap on how much you invest in in a single market in here is that because of regulatory reasons and then does that would we be more accurate if we didn't have those caps so people could dedicate even more money so yes and yes both okay so there's a there's a sort of regulatory history as to why which you guys wanted to talk about I'm happy to sort of shorten it for you but basically what we did was we New Zealand University of Victoria in New Zealand had been running a prediction market and again a good one we went to them and polling is broken as everybody knows right it's expensive it's hard to do it yeah people don't want to answer questions on the phone anymore somebody's got cell phones so it's really hard to get polling to get it right and if you can harness and our interest was well wow look at these guys at intrade and they you know they they set this up and also it's just a lot of fun I mean anyway you cut it so we teamed with Victoria University and said we want to bring this to the United States and the commodities future trading commission was was the government agency to whom Victoria took the request and got what's called a no action letter and the no action letter stipulate some of these limits you're it's a balancing act in terms of the limits serve a useful function although the limits could be and probably should be higher but the limits serve a useful function they keep you know the question is well how do you keep a whale out of the market if a Russian whale wants to come in and buy a whole bunch of shares and that happened with intrade and the irony with intrade is they they relieve the whale of more than a million of his dollars before the market settled back to the to the note to what it what it would have been otherwise so markets are very efficient at taking the money away from people who rely on fake news and that's that's part of that's one of the other things about it which is it's a potential antidote to fake news if you are watching fake news or consuming fake news and you're drinking the Kool-Aid you probably should not be unpredicted because they're they're people unpredicted are going to relieve you of your money so when we talk about prediction markets and they really I mean it seems like it was with with 2016 is when they became kind of a mainstream thing for at least for people paying attention to the the political races we we say well these are more accurate than like the kind of expert predictions are terrible so the people who go on CNN and pontificate about who's going to win about horse-ray politics are terrible and the polling is not that great or I mean it's it has it has issues that you raised but if those sources of information are not that great where are the people who are betting on predicted getting their information like what information are they acting on because they're not I mean these aren't like insiders in the political campaign usually they're regular people so that's a great question so what makes I'll reframe the question okay so what makes a super forecaster because somebody at that 3% it wasn't 3% of course but to use the hypothetical whoever picked the long shot at 3% did very well six months made a killing right so our can you isolate the it gets back to our original discussion about big data and databases and the like can you isolate the characteristics that make for a great forecaster we call them super forecasters and just see what they're what they're doing right and try to figure out what how does this person I mean so for instance and those questions haven't been answered yet we have a hundred and we had 150 researchers at 85 plus research you universities so they had you know economics department the marketing department the political science international relations department these these teams of researchers are digesting the anonymized data that we provide to them and trying to figure out what makes for a super forecaster how is you know is a fat cat in the beltway inside the beltway a better predictor of the outcome of the Iowa republican caucus than grandma to use her that example again who you know just reads the newspaper every day or maybe it doesn't read the newspaper maybe doesn't pay any attention to it but just you know she she has some other methodology for figuring out what's going to happen so what makes a super forecaster I don't can't answer that question for you except that they probably have really good BS detectors so this actually conversation reminds me about the debate within stock market prediction groups about whether or not you can truly beat the market right so there's the there's the whole move over the last 40 years towards index funds you know your Burton Malkiel ran the walkdown Wall Street even Warren Buffett saying that you know one of the most successful stock pickers of all time saying you shouldn't do this this is not successful over time you cannot beat the consensus of the market so there's like an there's an anti super forecaster sentiment that's been growing in stock market picking is the same thing true in political prediction markets are there folks who are skeptical of whether such a thing as a super political forecaster exists well I mean you're sitting across from somebody who's is a case study for how not to pick stocks so my 401 suffers you know so anytime I get involved every time I leave it alone it does fine when I get involved I'm sure something's going to happen pretty much bet against it so do as you say not as you do yeah so that's you know and I'm not allowed to to to uh to play on predicted because I've affiliated with Aristotle right so um so uh your question was what was so I mean do you see that I mean so you were talking about you're trying to find the super forecaster but is the super forecaster a myth a unicorn I don't know yeah okay I mean somebody's been you know people are making money right and people are losing money and over time the question is like the monkey right the monkeys throw the darts at the chart and the stock picking chart right so I wonder if so if you had something like predict it's you've got people who are logged in and making lots of bets on lots of things and I suspect that people who are really into it are betting on a lot of markets at the same time but so I wonder if you had something like that then coupled with the kind of you know almost creepy level demographic data that Facebook gathers about you if you could start like that question of then you could figure out is it the fact that grandmas in the midwest who make below a certain income are you know 40% more likely to predict the outcome of elections like you could imagine really interesting information coming out of kind of aggregating all this data that's being gathered the the analysis of what makes for you know accurate it may be that it's not grand it's not Sven Galli grandma it may be that it's that it may be that markets just function you know in a certain in a certain manner and they aggregate a lot of information I mean I don't use the that I don't use the term wisdom of crowds but that may have something to do with it you know there's there's there's some I think it's going to be fascinating to see what kind of research comes out of this just in terms of in terms of why markets are so accurate and they're not perfect as I said they're not 2020 yeah what's the I guess outside of the obvious value for investors who are participating in this at least the value for the ones who win and what's the long-term value in prediction markets in this kind of mechanism of so if we you know we get better at predicting the outcome of campaigns really far in advance does that create kind of positive externalities that's a great question I haven't been asked that question before I don't know I don't know I have to think about that one I can imagine off the top of my top of my head thinking of this being an advantage to the kind of political outsiders that we started talking about when we're talking about Aristotle where if you're not part of the two-party duopoly it's just assumed that the received wisdom is going to be you don't stand the chance but what that's not actually true the chance is rarely ever zero maybe it's only one percent or two percent or three percent but it gets you on the board a prediction market gets you on the board whereas received wisdom keeps you off the board entirely and some small yes maybe it's only a one or two percent chance but across thousands of elections across the country every year some of those one or two percent chances are more likely to pay off if we listen to prediction markets rather than to expert opinion well that that's that's possible so so there are 20 at last count between the billionaires and the and the senators and and the one of these there's 20 candidates running for the democratic nomination possible candidates this way it's probably 220 possibly there's 20 that that so we've got markets open on on them right will they run that is the market on will they get the not what when will they announce will they get the nomination will they win the chance these are all different markets that you can you can go in on and you can sort of see there's a bunch you know the two percenters right there's a whole bunch of people like clustered down there and it's shouldn't get up now that you know traditionally what happens is they wouldn't they give a good speech or have a good day or something file a good financial report and and and you know that would that would go unnoticed right unless they were anointed by the Washington press corps being the front runner or the you know the dark horse that's catching fire whatever that means right get the big mo right so but the fact of the matter is the prediction markets are are pretty adept at picking that stuff up and so it'll be really interested with this election cycle to sort of see how well they do in terms of and you know somebody may be in the front now and they may be at the back of that they may not even be a factor six months from now what do you say to I mean there are going to be some folks listening to this who are going to kind of viscerally recoil at the idea of betting on political futures I mean to some extent with with Aaron and I you're preaching to the choir when it comes to hey markets can efficiently access information it's a libertarian podcast after all but there are going to be folks who have a visceral reaction to that what do you say to the idea that this is kind of ghoulish this is unsavory that politics aren't something you should think of as a crass mechanistic financial you have a financial interest in that you should vote your heart not with your wallet or something you know I I can imagine lots of objections along those lines right so so those who do well in first of all I don't have a perfect response to the to the person who says it's you know there should be no money in politics you know that's an extension of that argument which is you know not only should you not make money but you should not put money into politics because you know you just encourage these politicians to do more of what they're doing right in any event there are lots of objections and and anything I'm involved in is never going to be pure enough for for to satisfy everybody or even many people but my my feeling is that this is in a this is one of those areas that that should be reviewed more as political speech if you decide to to put your money where your mouth is that to me is a pretty pure expression of democratic sentiment furthermore predicted does function and this is another area that's being studied right now so it's a little premature to give a to jump to this conclusion but if you ever come to the predicted parties we have you know it's debate night what they watch debates or they this election night parties or we get you know we we open a bar you have a bar which is the political bar in the state capital on election nights or nights when there are debates or something happening those places are packed and you will see a whole generation of people who really are have many of whom have not been involved in politics before but like sports fantasy or some of the other types of places where you've actually got some skin in the game you know all of a sudden there is just this avid interest in in hanging on every word in the debate because you're trying to figure out if donald trump is going to say you know crooked hillary in the tweet tomorrow so so predicted is a an engagement tool and i think one of the things that's going to come with this is we're going to discover that that especially the demographic that that does sports fantasy and does you know super bowl all this but i think you're going to see greater engagement by that that demographic of young people who otherwise you know it's a bunch of people talking about politicians a bunch of people talking about stuff is not relevant to my life and frankly i didn't i didn't see any of that tax cut but if you've got ten bucks writing on what's going to happen you're going to pay attention and it gets to another thing you just said which is you're in a market you're not supposed to vote with your heart you're supposed to vote with your head right and that's kind of what predicted does it's amazing if you guys or if your audience goes to predict it dot o r g you just put you know you can you can open an account as little as ten bucks if you put as little as ten bucks down you're going to see how it clears your head in terms of what you're making a prediction on whether you're not you know it's who the 2020 democratic nominee is going to be trump impeachment you start to think is that really worth 22 cents or should it be 23 cents maybe i'm going to put it in offer for 21 and and that's how prediction markets i think that's an element to why they're so accurate well and it produces a certain degree of another positive social externality just as say fantasy football encourages people who are previously casual consumers of football to learn more about the sport to be more engaged increases the level of knowledge about this venue the same thing it would be true in politics that the process of engaging expose and maybe expose them the new ideas right there was a certain way they were voting you know because that's what the how their family voted so they were party line voters in this way but now that they have skin in the skin in the game they're spending more and more time engaged with the issues learning about the candidate looking for their higher information who are so right about that in fact if i may just a second so people who the study shows that people who have money writing on a football game or 44 more times more likely to watch football the football games and in fact the season predicted or people who are involved in fantasy sports or betting on sports become voracious consumers of sports statistics you just have to ask espion about this right they you buy you you consume you you try to get as much of that information as you possibly can because you want to make the most accurate right what's the batting average what happens on a rainy day all that stuff the same may be true with political prediction markets is that you become real interested real fast even if you've only got 10 bucks writing on what's going to happen and the the the corollary of that is there's a reward mechanism built in as we said earlier if you're if you're making your predictions based on fake news you're you're not going to do so well i just sort of be the kind of doom and gloom guy though to counter that does it run the risk that if i have bet a bunch of money on a slate of candidates say that when i then go to the polls the person i'm going to vote for is not going to be the one who i think will govern the best has the best principles is the best the job but rather the person who i have predicted is going to win and so therefore my slate of candidates will pay off which would seem to be i mean it's it's good for my the my income but it's not necessarily good for democracy if that's the reason we're picking candidates that you may have a perfectly valid point i don't know if i i talk to people who who's bemoan the fact that they put money on the opposite of what they're going to do because they edge their bets so there's a that way i'm not going to be disappointed when my candidate doesn't win right so there's that thing going on how much of it is what you describe which is probably a lot and how much is what i just anecdotally describe to you i don't know but that's one of those things i mean wouldn't it be just interesting to know look our our who's the better who's the better predictor of the outcome of a democratic or republican primary campaign is it somebody that's you know a democrat or republican or independent or i don't know the answer that we're going to know the answers to some of those questions pretty soon though i still like the theory it's a urs fengali grandma in the midwest i think clearly every time um so while we move on for sake of time to your original title back before you were a ceo back before you ran for congress you were known as the a bomb kid right so and this is uh a quite a literal appellation you were uh as i understand that an undergraduate princeton and you designed an atomic bomb something that you know most undergraduates do usually buy their sophomore year i was on academic probation at the time so that's uh you know they had to do something um my thesis advisor was the eminent uh physicist freeman dyson that's one of those interesting fun facts to no one tell so freeman was told me when i set out to do this this is a junior uh thesis is what they have so you do these in your junior you pick a topic and you dig into it and you ignore your other classes and you're supposed to do so that's that's what this that's what this project was um you know freeman informed me from the first day when i asked to be my thesis advisor he wasn't going to be able to help me with any of this uh because he had security clearances and i frankly nobody thought i was going to succeed anyway uh you know it at coming close but yes that's that uh that happened and uh it was it was quite a roller coaster after that um it was uh you know the point was to see how difficult it would be for a terrorist group or a uh criminal organization or even a third world country to build a bomb which i didn't do i've designed it right and the the premise much of the debate at the time about proliferation it's eerily similar to debate now but much of the debate about proliferation of nuclear weapons was that you didn't need to tighten up security around plutonium and uranium the wrong ingredients for uh atomic bomb because it would take a manhattan project to design and then build a bomb and therefore we should be lax in exporting technology and materials around the world because places like pakistan would never be able to come up with an atomic bomb it was this sort of this hubris which proved not to be the case and and as a as a result of a lot of work by people who are very concerned about proliferation and been working the issue for a long long time especially you know in washington democrats and republicans um uh a um um some of the there were curbs placed on on the spread of some of the technology mostly plutonium reprocessing facilities this is a whole great subject for another podcast yeah i'm happy to talk about it uh you know this is like i had a bit roll in this whole thing but it was sort of a punctuation mark i guess for you know for the proliferation debate because once once i did what i did then it sort of took ripped the rug out from underneath the argument that you're not the secure physical material less so i have to ask you said you you designed one but you didn't build one yeah but could you have uh the questions could i have without killing myself uh sure yeah well there was there was that kid who built one in his shed the boy scout in michigan who built one in his potting shed in the 90s may have yeah irradiated himself pretty severely uh you know it would not have been uh a trivial matter uh if you had part of the part of the the unfortunate part about the whole thing is that the whole subject is that um even if you you know the the atomic bombs that were that were used over uh Hiroshima Nagasaki only consumed a fraction of the physical material so they were not what we would call efficient and efficient design a lot of the work so you know in a lot of the work around atomic nuclear devices is to make it and make it efficient so they can be smaller so they can go on the top of the warhead that sort of thing or unfortunately in a suitcase somewhere so the the the and and failure if you create a dirty bomb right if that's your intention you set out to create a dirty bomb you don't really you know you're you're you're striving to do something different than create an efficient uh device so uh there's you know there's still very good reason to uh to tighten keep security tight on these materials and there you know there's that personally i think we we were in a much more precarious situation especially with the with the collapse of the Soviet Union um it was an example of at the time it wasn't perfect it was an example of you know bipartisan support uh and international support to get these to to stop these from these weapons from falling into the wrong hands and and how successful how successful we were there's evidence of that because we're we're here today but you know i don't it sounds like something betting market on that's right yeah i don't think we'll avoid that one so that that um thesis made you something of a household name lots of talk show circuit appearances uh you're the first 24 year old not involved in fronting a rock band to get like a cover article in Rolling Stone as far as i as far as i know um and you you kind of leveraged some of that fame to run for congress we talked about those campaigns in Connecticut in 80 and 82 so what made you decide to switch from being the you know the front the the face of a campaign and then the next year after that second failed bid is when you start Aristotle right like so what's going on in your head as you go from you know young and i think by the standards of the time maybe not by the standards of 2016 2018 you were considered fairly liberal on a lot of policies in 1982 like how do you decide to go from that to running a bipartisan political campaign platform so so it was those experiences so first of all you know my brother and i were broke so we had to we needed a job and so the the thing we knew how to do was to run a campaign which didn't succeed in the general election but did succeed in the primary election campaign and and so it was it was a um we loved the campaign the the democratic process itself it's like it's fascinating we use how people come together how they try to articulate their point of view it was highly inefficient computers were just the brand new thing and and and we felt based on my my what my the program my brother had cobbled together for the campaign that this is an area where you know some there's room for growth and there's also room a lot of room for improvement it was just too hard to run a political campaign in those days if you didn't you know even if you had the blessing of the party it was just really really hard and it shouldn't be that hard it should be easy to you know to get your point of view across and and and then let the voters make a decide it's a one-day sale you let the voters make a decide as to how much merit your ideas have and that's the basis on which i know it sounds you know naive but the fact of the matter is that is pretty much what aerostyle is dedicated itself to you know in this intervening period of time is to try to make it easier for points of view which may not be mainstream or mainstream to be heard by voters so that they because ultimately voters make the right choice you know in all these elections we were involved in ultimately they they weigh you know their own personal circumstances but also what they think is best for the their community or their country and their neighbors and and that's how they that's how they cast their ballot one last thing i think unless you have something erin as i was reading the the rolling stone interview actually there was this this is the section where you talked i mean this is 1980 so it's been a while you talked about admiring like the great figures in history like joe de vark alexander the great napoleon you wanted to be like the ancient greeks who tried to make a substantive contribution in one's lifetime as a way of leaving a legacy that outlived you so let's talk about like i want to be preserving civilization rather than than you know destroying civilization um you also mentioned like a childhood dream of being an astronaut in all this so young political relative political radical for the time trying to get into politics in the late 70s early 80s these big dreams and visions and actually while reading that i thought of some another politician new gingrich someone who's also obsessed with space travel loves history it might sound like a bit more of a uh a uh i don't know if that's a compliment given the trajectory of his career but it's interesting to me that there might be something about your generation who are coming of age in the 70s so it's post new left post 1960s they have you had a big vision but also saw a lot of really systematic institutional problems in america and wanted to do something about it albeit i assume your solutions in 1980 were rather different from new gingrich's but some of that same energy i what that puts in mind be in mind now i think for the my final question would the you know 1980 24 year old liberal wonder kid who invented the atomic bomb and then ran as a radical democrat for congress like would he be happy with you now the 60 some-year-old you know oh i'm sure i'm sure grossly disappointed uh i was you know my my viewpoints when i ran for congress were would today be considered pretty much mainstream or conservative i mean that's the irony of it right medicinal marijuana and then so i you know i ended up uh look what i what i do look i think what i what i what i'm involved in what my company's involved in things like predicted they're there i think these are these are important sort of endeavors right and and i've been very lucky they're also i want to stress how much fun it yeah it is to be doing what i do i really enjoy being the CEO of a company and i really enjoyed it gives me the opportunity to stuff like predicted or look how fascinating it is to be able to go to a foreign country and be able to help manage a political campaign try to get your arms around what's going on and how i told you earlier on it's invigorating it's inspiring you see people waiting in the sun for hours to vote in an election where you know you're trying to make sure that the votes are all counted etc it's just it's great so i have i have no regrets about that i don't think i would have for the record i don't think i would have made a very good congressman so i don't think so either and that's a compliment all right yeah yeah and i do think the uh the ancient greeks would approve so i think here 19 version be happy uh and that's all for today and until next week be well building tomorrow is produced by test terrible if you enjoy our show please rate review and subscribe to us on itunes or wherever you get your podcasts to learn about building tomorrow or to discover other great podcasts visit us on the web at libertarianism.org


All right, patch out is now. Jesus. The machine, 9 to 10. Albert Poulos. Three color. That is disgusting, dude. Or as Sean would say, Albert Poulos. Oh, I got to show you how he said shinsuke Nakamura. S-H-I-N-S-K-A-Y. 9 to 10, let's go, Lenny.