Hello and welcome to malware analysis for Hedgehogs. One of the videos with the most views is the .NET unpacking video where I unpacked a nano-coret. And I don't think it's quite that good, because I was quite confused while using the Anspy. The reason is that I used an old version of it, and I was expecting features that this old version didn't have. So I would like to make an update on how to use the Anspy, the new version of it, probably. Actually, you don't even need .NET unpacker or mega-dump anymore, because now you can use the Anspy to dump the memory yourself. But we will just see how we use the Anspy with this sample. So that's our sample right here. Just the way I usually get it without an extension and without, well, any information on it. And most of the time, I like to check it first with, well, where is it? P studio or POTX analyzer or anything similar. Just to take a look into if it's a P file, of course. So no. P studio has a GUI that POTX analyzer doesn't have, so it's most of the time easier to see the important stuff. And let's check this. Okay, this is, well, firstly, this is not a .NET file. It has several imports. .NET file usually just has one import. And also, if you look at those strings in here, it doesn't look like a typical .NET file, which would use functions related to .NET. But this looks like a raw SFX file. You see the debug path here, or also here, that this is a serve extracting executable. And also, the archive is in the overlay, and usually all that all this executable does is unpacking the archive in the overlay, and maybe doing some installation on running something. Yeah. So you can simply unpack this with 7zip. So we will just do that right here. Okay, three files. These, I don't want to click it. So I should use my disarm script here, but I didn't install it on this machine, because I prepared them just right before I make the videos. So, okay. But this had an interesting icon already, and those are just some unknown binary files, which we should look at. Okay. And this too. Now, this doesn't make much sense here, but it has patterns. It has, if it's something that's encrypted, it's likely not a cryptographically save encryption because of the patterns. And if this would be XOR, you might conclude that these parts here are the key. Usually, the key will show in the zero areas of the file. Okay. What's this? It's also just stuff, and we can't do anything with it. It looks pretty dense too, and if you put this in Portex Analyzer, you would probably see a high entropy image here. Yeah. Okay. Mostly, but it's not everywhere. So, okay. Yeah. And the other one? No. Okay. No. I just confused them. This is the one where I said we have these patterns, which might be an XOR encryption. So, you see that there is, although there are high entropy areas, there are also some low entropy areas. So, there's still kind of a structure in this file. And for that one, I think it should be, yeah. Yeah. This is how a more safe encryption would look like, or even compression. But I don't know what it is. So, let's check our .exe file. We don't need those anymore. Yes, please. This one. That's the .net file. We already see here that the signature is there, and also the one and single import that's usually done for .net file with mscory.dll. And here you can see some, yeah, .net typical functions, and system refection is quite typical for injectors, for .net packed files that use reflection to run the packed file inside. So, yeah. Let's take a look at it with a decompiler. Okay. This is the metadata information, and it's already not that... Well, if I would see this, I would immediately assume it's malware, because legend files do not use random strings normally. I mean, there are always exceptions of people who like to protect the files and with protection that's kind of malware-like. But most of the time it's really malware, if you see this. Yeah. Okay. Let's just take more of an overview. Here's a late call. That's probably where the packed file is called. No, the question is, where's the packed file? Okay. That looks good. There's something that's worth remembering is that 77 and 90 are m and z. So, this looks like a p-file that's saved right here in the byte area, because it starts with mz, then there are zeros mostly, and then there's the ms.submessage. I assume it is. I'm not able to see the matrix, but the pattern really looks like it. The cool thing with .net is if you like to unpack it statically, you can just use for instance visual studio to copy and paste the decompile code in there and unpack it this way. We will just do it here. Visual C-sharp, Alex C-sharp, more than visual basic. I can just pause it better. Read it faster. Okay. Let's create the project. Copy this. Now just remove this. We don't need that. And we don't need that. And we will create an array here. This is our byte array.  File, write all bytes, I guess. Then it should be the path, and then it should be the byte array. And for the path, I'll come on double slashes. There's the dump one here. And I think it needs an import. Yes. And it tells me system IO. We will use that import. Okay. And if I run it, it should create our dumped file on the desktop. If I did everything correct. Let's check. And it didn't. Oh, it took a while. Failure. Okay. I made some mistake in the path. Problem now. That's the same, right? Please do that again. Okay. The debug go wasn't set. What's that? Oh, wait. I really hate that. I think the error message was not related at all to the course. And that's something I really hate. Okay. But now, yeah, now it worked. Okay. That's our dumped file. And if you check this in the hex editor, you can see that it's indeed starting with MZ. And here's this program cannot be run in the smart step message. Okay. It's quite small. The file is small. How much is that? Okay. Only four kilobytes. That's not much. I guess we will have to unpack further. And let's check this file. Here's the dump. Okay. Yeah, interesting. Now, we could now proceed doing the same thing we already did. We could now just copy and paste the code and run it. So, unpack it basically with our code, statically. But there's a faster way and that's using the Nspy. And I will just do that now. Let's check first what happens here. That's the main method. And it reads all bytes from array two. And here's array. Array is created from the data in here. And it applies the split method on that. So, it was split here. And it was split here. And that means array, array. I think due to the split, this should be array two because it splits twice at that point. And array zero is this. Array zero is used here. Okay. Well, I could be wrong, though. Okay. Here's array two. Now, it gets a bit confusing. But let's just unpack it. It looks like it's reading this file here. And then it calls the decrypt with the key array zero, which is this. And then decrypts the data. And afterwards, calls assembly load on the decrypted file. So, that means this file contains our packed file. Yeah. Our study Nspy now. And there it is. The dump. Okay. And we also know where we need to set our breakpoint because at this point, this is the byte array that's passed to the decrypt function. And here it will, in this loop, decrypt the data. And at this point, it should be in memory and in a decrypted state. Okay. So, we add the breakpoint here and run it. And that's something that we couldn't do with this old version of the Nspy. Now, we see here the local variables and their contents. So, yes, please expand it. It says it's too big, but it shows some some values and it starts with 45a. And those are the m and that again. This time in hex instead of decimal values, but it's again a packed part of executable as I would assume. We can now right click here and show in memory. And it has already selected that memory area. And now we can just save the selection to disk. Dump two. Please save. And that's it. We don't want to run it here. Now, we have another dump right there. It's the second dump.  That means it has used an obfuscator. And this version, this obfuscator can be defeated using default dot. So, let's just use that. You just need to drag and drop it in there. Yeah, detected smart assembly. And where is the clean here? It's a clean dump. And now we can just use that one to check. Okay, looks much better already. Now, here's some more, there's some more things going on than just unpacking. It has some entire, well, it tries to detect certain tools like Fiddler and it tries to detect VMware and VirtualBox. So, it would probably not run if it does this, which is interesting. But it, that also depends on certain settings. It's some of those, you see the if, all of the if statements right here. Check some kind of settings that can be set. And so it's probably created by a builder to do this. And here you see get prog address, which is typically and load library typically used by packers. Okay, so I guess we have to unpack again. Let's just do that next layer. And this is really not that uncommon that you have multiple layers. It's not really a problem, but it's annoying having so many layers of packed files. And here, this is the string that's used to set the settings of this. And if you want to, you can kind of will try to analyze it and see what this all means by checking the if statements. But yeah, let's just try to unpack it for now. We'll step into here. There's a split on those. Lots of stuff going on. And I don't know what it does here. But here you can see it reads all bytes from something. Let's see if we get, okay, I think I should go into this one. We will add a breakpoint. Does it go back there? Come on. Okay, we will start it again. Step into breakpoint still set. Yeah, please there then step into then let's check what happens. Here's also some kind of area would just that this is the area of the settings. Yeah. Okay, I guess now that I started it multiple times, it might not unpack properly. So I'm not quite sure if I have to repeat this. Oh, in here, returns here. Well, maybe we can also get it to this point. Okay. What's this? Yes, please expand. We have several arrays. And here's some encoded stuff. And here, yes, please show. It's also some encoded stuff. Step into please. And here it does the decoding. Wow, great. Let's check this. That's not decoded. It's also array. I'm not sure where it is. The array. Yes, please. Oh, no, look at this. I'm not quite sure about the naming here. Why it's called a zero. But here's again, 45 a that's the mz. And I guess it's in this area. But really, I don't know what's named this way. Okay, we will show it here. And then save the selection. And we have our third dump. Three save. Okay, please stop. It's probably not also running in the background, the malware, but I have no internet connection. Nothing should happen. And this is our dump file. And we should take a look at it, I guess. This is not a .NET executable anymore. Oh, yeah, this is how it looks like the enemy. It has an overlay with just zeros in it. So it might be that it, well, that might be caused by a bug when writing or something or just, but not much interesting stuff here. It doesn't look packed though. If you look at those, it looks quite normal. So maybe we are at the end now. And yeah, that's good. If you see this, it's password stealer, credential stealer. He tries to read passwords from Thunderbird and from Mozilla. Here you see this saying on escalate from, I guess, from Mozilla. And maybe also the internet history that's been stolen. I'd look credentials maybe too. And this is quite typical for keyloggers. Because they have to lock the keys that you press and they would do this, this way. Yeah. So I looked up this file, uploaded it to VarusTable, and it showed as netwirerc-backdoor. I'm not sure that it is exactly that vector, but I guess so. I haven't seen it before. So I cannot really recognize it from my experience. Okay. And that's it. We unpacked this file in, well, let's say four layers. The first was this SFX, and then we had two .NET layers. And then we had, the last one was this. Three .NET layers. Okay. Yeah. If you have any questions, please post them below. And thank you for watching.


Let me throw in a question here Assume I agree with you that the state's interest in marriage is essentially procreative How does permitting same-sex marriages impair or adversely affect that interest your honor that gets to the fundamental disagreement there? They say that it's not enough for opposite sex Unions to further and advance these vital state interests that we have to prove that Including same-sex unions into the definition of marriage would actually harm those purposes and interests that is not Equal protection I am asking you to tell me how it would harm opposite sex marriages. All right All right Let's play on the same playing field for once. Okay? Your honor my answer My answer is I don't know. I don't know does that mean Does that mean if this is not determined to be subject to rational basis review you lose? No, your honor Just haven't figured out how you're gonna win on that basis yet your honor By saying that the state and its electorate are entitled when dealing with radical proposals for change to move with caution Keep in mind this same-sex marriage is a very recent innovation its implications of a social and cultural nature Not to mention its impact on marriage over time can't possibly be known So this is a political question and the court should abstain is that it? Mr. Olson Often quotes the Supreme Court statement that marriage creates the most important relation in life that quote Comes from the Maynard case and the Maynard court explained why the institution of marriage is uniquely Inbued with public people get married to benefit the community your honor When one enters into a marriage you don't say oh boy, I'm going to be able to benefit society by getting married What you think of is I'm going to get a life partner Yes, your honor somebody that I can share my life with maybe have children But all sorts of things come out of a marriage Yeah, but if you but is this the purpose of marriage for individuals individuals to benefit society well It may well be that individuals who get married aren't doing it in order to benefit the community Although that is the ultimate result of it, but the question has to be what well Why does the government? Regulate this relation. That's a good question. Why doesn't it leave it entirely up to private contract? Yeah, it is because this relationship is crucial to the public interest because your honor the pro-creative Sexual relation is an enormous benefit to society and it represents a very real threat to society's interests a Threat a threat a threat in the sense that to whatever extent children are born into the world without This stable enduring marital unit and and and raised by both of the parents that brought them into this world Then a host of very very negative social implications arise But the state doesn't withhold the right to marriage to people who are unable to produce children of their own Are you suggesting that the state should? No No, your honor. No, it is by no means a necessary of a necessary Condition or a necessary require well then the state must have some interest wholly apart from procreation your honor Isn't a necessary requirement that the state actually insist that individuals who get married to have children or be able to have children How how would it go about administering such a requirement? It would be Have to have a pre pre pre marital fertility testing some kind of pre marital pledge in which the couple found to be Fertile some kind of intrusive process also pledge to actually have children Your honor I these kinds of orwellian or or well it is orwellian But isn't that the logic that flows from the premise that marriage is about procreation? It is enough if the state or the society seeks to attempt to ensure and increase the likelihood Really, that's what it boils down to increase the likelihood that naturally Procreative sexual relationships will take place in an enduring and stable family environment for the sake of raising children Isn't the state indifferent with respect to how the child was conceived the state and every state and every society for the millennia Your honor has attempted to channel Naturally procreative sexual conduct between men And women into an enduring stable union for the sake let's move on from the millennia to the three weeks of in january when we had the trial What does the evidence show? Thank you. Thank you your honor. I I I believe the evidence shows Overwhelmingly that this interest in what many call and and the united states congress calls Responsible procreation is really at the heart of society's interest in regulating marriage Okay, because for example what the evidence shows is that image just what was the witness who offered the testimony? What was it and so forth? Yes, your honor uh Sociologist kingsley davis has described the universal societal interest In marriage as recognition and approval of a couple engaging in sexual intercourse and marrying and rearing offspring Blackstone your honor said that there are two great relations in private life first that of husband and wife I don't mean to be flipped, but blackstone didn't testify Kingsley davis didn't testify What testimony in this case supports the proposition, but your honor you don't have to have evidence for this from these authorities This is in the cases themselves. I don't have to have evidence You don't you don't have to have evidence of the of this point if one court after another your honor Most courts most of the courts at least two-thirds your honor or or just approximately anyway Two-thirds of all the judges that have looked at this issue before you have have upheld the traditional or would have Would have upheld the traditional definition of marriage on this rationale this this this rationale And the plaintiffs say there is no way to understand why anyone would support proposition eight except through some irrational Dark motivation some animus some some kind of bigotry your honor That is just not only a slur on seven million californians who supported proposition eight It is a slur on 70 out of 108 judges who have If you have got seven million californians who took this position 70 judges as you pointed out And this long history that you have described why in this case did you present but one witness on the subject? One witness


The City of Paintsville will be holding its Halloween Sputacular celebration this weekend. This Saturday, you can join the fun at the downtown pavilion, located at 404 Main Street. Activities include pumpkin decorating, costume contest, refreshments, and more. The fun starts at 6.30 and will end at 9.30 p.m. For Mountain Top News, I'm Joel Hodgell.


Hey folks Chad bunny here from the Chad That's right. Hey big shout out to Darren Marlar and the weirdo family members from the weirdo watch party. Yeah. Thanks again for having us on When we did our the ghost train movie. Yeah, so, you know horror hosts are dying breed pun intended Ha ha ha, but they are still loved and beloved by movie fans All over the world especially weirdos so If you want to join the weird darkness host Darren Marlar and the weirdo family members They show a different horror movie What is it each month once a month?  Yeah, get yourself a box today But folks make sure you drink it after you're done watching the weirdo watch party. You're gonna need some time with this one Yeah, well no as soon as you drink it about what what's the time like five minutes? Yeah, it works that fast You're gonna need a few hours. Yeah, so if you like to watch horror movies, and you want to be a weirdo Like us then watch the weirdo watch party


This is your host, getting you welcome to another little jam session behind the squeaking door. We're introducing a new kind of music. It's called Swing and Slay. And believe me, it really stands here, straight to the gallows. But, uh, oh, you have a friend who wants to join. Why, certainly. All he has to do is tear off the top of a clue and send it to the Spook of a Month Club. We'll call for him. It's a great skinner sanctum mystery. Don't Dance on My Grave was written by Emil Tepperman and star Charlotte Holland in the role of Julia with Arnold Moss as Stephen. Are you in the mood for a tale of madness and mystery? Good. The setting for our story tonight is a great old house. Sitting on the crest of a gentle slope where it overlooks the countryside, usually in the sunlight, it's quaint and beautiful. But now, in the middle of the night, it's shrouded in darkness. There's no light in any window. But in the south bedroom, there, facing the garden, a young woman sleeps unrestfully. Her sleep is disturbed by strange, terrifying dreams. Her name, Julia Martel. She's only been married a year. But the shadow of fear cares not where it falls. Am I sleeping or waking? Is this a dream or reality? How can I talk? Stephen's talking. My husband's feeding. What'd she say? She could graze and bury me? No. No, he can't. He can't. She's in the garden. It's my sister-in-law Caroline. She hates me. Must wake up, I must. Must be high in my dreams. What was it, Dr. Krauss? She used to tell me it's a sanitarium. Old hateful Dr. Krauss. I've had a dream. Terrible dream. Stephen and Carolyn and Dr. Krauss, all me could tell something dreadful. But I can't remember worst of it. What's that, Marie? Her name's in the garden. Like someone digging. I'd better wait for Stephen. Stephen. Stephen, wake up. There's someone in the garden. She's not here. She's not in the spirit. She's left me alone in the middle of the night. They're digging. Someone's still digging in the garden. I've got to see. No more, but I can see them digging in the garden. It's Stephen. Stephen and his sister Caroline.  But what are they digging in the garden in the middle of the night? What? No. Long and shallow. A grave. My grave. She'll come for me. Come to get me. Put me in my grave. I've got to hide quickly. But it can never find me. Where can I hide? Father. No, no, they shouldn't look there. They'll put me in the bed. No, no. My head is so tight. It's so tight. No place to hide. Father, get back in your bed. Bed is usually where you sleep at night, darling. Huh? It's almost not a car. Caroline and I had our breakfast hours ago. It's a glorious morning. I suppose you'd rather have a bit of breakfast and then we'll take a long walk. What's that about? You were frightened and you were moaning and you were asleep. Another one of those nightmares? No, no. I'm all right. I'll get up. Did anything out of the way happen last night? Why do you ask? Oh, I thought. Yes. Never mind. No, what were you going to say? It wasn't anything, really. I was just looking at my shoes. I was just looking at the mud. It must have been us last night. Were you out in the garden last night, Steve? In the garden? Yeah. Shooter, just what are you driving us? I don't know. I don't know. Steve and I must have been having one of those horrible dreams. Yeah. Oh, Steve and I wanted to find where they cured. Maybe you brought me home to the sanatorium. So it was another nightmare. Now look here, darling. Don't you worry about it. I'm having Dr. Krauss out here this afternoon. Dr. Krauss? Steve, you're not going to send me back. There's nothing to worry about, darling. It's just a routine checkup.  I'll be waiting downstairs. And whatever's bothering you, don't let it worry you. Just call it a bad dream. Really? Was it really just a bad dream? But I saw them digging the grave last night. And then I fainted. Maybe it was a dream. Let me see. I was standing here at the window. It all seems so clear. Where were they digging? Over there, I think. Near the oak tree. But I don't see the grave. Maybe they covered it up again. I've got to go down and look. I've got to find out. Nobody in the hall. This way back here. It seems in the cloak in the kitchen. She hates me too. Oh, it's flying. It's nothing to point to, Caroline. But if it's flying so thin, I'll be back toward Caroline. Not the glass. Now along the side to the garden. Ah! Footprints? Footprints in the soft ground. A man's and a woman's.  Follow the footprint. Over here by the oak tree. Yes? This is where I saw them digging. Here. Here it is. She grunts and dug up and filled in again. That's the shape of a grave. No. It wasn't a dream then. Any of it? Okay, one thing. I just heard you come up behind me. Well, it's because you were so busy examining the ground. What? Were you looking? Oh, Georgia. The ground here. It's been dug up. The shape of a grave. Yes, it is. Who's grave was it to be? And why did you fill it in again? I think you'd better come back into the house, Georgia. No. Now please come quietly, Georgia. Caroline and I want to talk. No, let go of my arm. You're hurting me. I'm sorry, Georgia, but you've got to come in with us. No, no, I won't. Let's go with me. You're coming in quietly, Georgia. Oh, my arm. Are you coming? Go right into the darling when your breakfast is ready. I want my breakfast. You've got to eat something, darling. I'll sit here. What is it to be? The last meal of the condemned woman? Oh, Julia, darling. What makes you say that? Oh, what? I thought you loved me, Stephen.  Julia. Don't pretend, Stephen. I know that grave out there under the oak tree was supposed to be for me. But you must have changed your plans last time you filled the din. Here comes Caroline with your breakfast. We'll talk about it after a few weeks. Good morning, Julia. It's a nice, steaming hot coffee. Golden health. Just the way you like it. Get her. What are you and Susan up to? What Julia? Julia has some strange idea that we want to kill her. Oh, Lord. You know Susan, and I love you. Do you? You drink the coffee. You'll feel different after this happens. I brooded myself. What is wrong with your life? You brooded? What's the matter with Susie? Why didn't Susie make my breakfast? I heard her in the kitchen before. That wasn't Susie. You heard her in the kitchen, Julia. Yes, dear. I made the breakfast this morning. But where's Susie?  Stephen, what is it? Caroline. Don't you know where Susie is? Hmm. Nothing. I don't know. We buried her there last night. Caroline, no. In the graves under the old tree. What happened to her? A throat was cut during the night. Who did it? Don't you know? No one to have a carry. Don't try to keep calm, darling. Remember what Dr. Klaus told you. Excitement is best. How can I help it with the both of you? You, Stephen, and you, Caroline, standing there looking at me. It's as if I had touched everything's throat in the middle of the night. You know, one of your bedrooms that was in the hall I tried to see to you. It had blood on it. We will have to let Dr. Klaus take you back to the sanitarium until you're fully cured. You know, please see something we'd like to do rather than jail, do we? There's only one thing, darling. What did you do with the night? What night? The one you cut through these doors. You can't find it. I didn't. I swear I didn't. Without Julian, finish that coffee. We must have that night. Leave me alone. Leave me alone. Come back, Julian. We want that night. I'm driving mad. I cut through these doors my sleep. I couldn't remember if that person was safe. But it's cold out. Something in the heart of what? Life. Even corn came down to the one you gave us the letter of... The blood on his face. I did it in the night. The night. Also, then, let's say I feel free to look at this night for the last so long. Thank heaven you're being reasonable, Julian. Dr. Klaus, do you have the night? Yes, I have the night, Caroline. Don't come any closer. My dear Julian, you must be alive if we are your friends. Stay where you are, Dr. Klaus. One of you is coming into this room. Dr. Klaus has come all the way from the city to talk to you. He thinks he can help. Help me? By taking me back to that sanitary? My dear, I would do only what is best for you. The first you must give me the night. Oh, Julia! Did the knife cut your hand, Dr. Klaus? I'm so sorry I warned you, Dr. Klaus. Did she hurt you? No, no, Caroline. It's on her scratch. Julia, you must realize that you're not acting for your own good. I'm doing it seriously. Serious mental trouble. Don't cry if you insist on fighting this trouble alone.  Well, I don't want anything from anybody. Just leave me alone. You want to be left alone so you can go back to sleep. You've been sleeping all day, Dr. Klaus. Sleep will not help you, Julia. Your dreams are no longer quiet and peaceful. They're full of violence and terror. Oh, no. You cannot find safety anywhere, but with me, I can help you to cure the sickness of your life. Give me that. No. Get out! All of you, go away!  Julia, you've got a little... You've never opened the door to anyone. My head is too tight. I could only... I'll put the knife down on the floor. No. I can't. Lock the door again. What do we do, Dr. Klaus? We can't leave her in here with a knife. Stephen, aren't you scared? Well, just wait. I think I'll stay here overnight. There's a storm coming up anyway, and I do not like driving in the rain. Perhaps in the morning. Like I'll have to spend the night on a couch and a living room.  I don't think any of us will be able to see much tonight. Come with me. The land. See a star. The middle of the night. There's no time. A cave in the storm. With that knife. I'm here on the floor. I'll take it along. The place is set with fresh blood. You know what? That's your car. Nobody could have gotten in. And Mr. Rook in the door has gone off. I've got to find out. I'll take the knife along. Stephen said he'd be taking on the car. In the living room. Down the stairs. I didn't even know where it was. There you are. I think it's in the car. I'll cross the hall. I'll take the door carefully. This is the end. She's alive, too. I'll just turn right from the dead.   Judith. Did you hear it? Did you do it in your sleep? There was fresh blood on the blades. My door was locked. The key was in the lock. Nobody could have gotten it. So they went back and locked the door. All in my sleep. She gave up the knife. Just a minute. Caroline. Your shoes, Caroline.  They're soaking wet. Oh, Beth. I heard the garage door banging in the wind. They kept me awake. My phone caught me all the way back. I see. I was almost positive I'd locked those garage doors. She thinks he's lying. What do you mean? I saw you in bed just a minute ago under the blanket. Why did you get into bed fully dressed with wet shoes and socks? Your imagination must be running wild. She thinks he's sleeping. I saw her in bed under the blanket. She was pretending to be asleep. Judith, I... I didn't know what to believe. I've been doing the same thing lately. I'm asking you to believe that it was Caroline who killed Dr. Carr's mother. How? Don't you see, Susan? She did go out of the house but not to close the garage door. She must have got the ladders in the garage and faced it against my window. Then she climbed into my room while I was asleep and took the knife. She killed Dr. Carr then climbed back and left the knife and then the storm started and she got her feet wet. It would have been all right if I hadn't been awakened by the thunder and found the bloody knife. But it's less than a chance than this. And when she heard me in the house, she slipped under the blanket and turned into a creature very pretty here, my dear Julia, except that you didn't see me in bed. I thought we could prove that very easily. What? I said we could prove very easily whether or not you were in bed by looking at your bed parallel. If Julia really did see you in bed, then the sheets in the blanket would be wet and mud-scented. Stephen! Shall we go and look? Never mind. I did it. I killed Carl. She gets your Susie too when he tries to ruin it on me. Stephen, I did it for your sake. I had to bring her to your senses somehow. You never should have married this woman. And all the things that I thought about Julia, they're all untrue. You had no right to bring her into this house. You're the one who's in pain. I was insane to think I could change Stephen's mind. That was a mistake I made, Julia. I should have killed you first. But it isn't too late. I've got the night and I'll do it now. Stop that, Caroline!  Stop that! Please, Caroline!  Come back here, Julia! Light under a half-questioning nature. She's over. I'm going to miss Caroline. You know, she was a pretty keen customer that Caroline. Nothing dull about her. In fact, I'd say she was the knife of a party. The only trouble was she didn't know when to stop. Good-bye. Pleasant. Dream. This is the United States Armed Forces Radio Service, the voice of information and education.


The 94th meeting of the Monetary Council of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, the ECCB, was held at the ECCB headquarters by Stairs and Kits and Nevis on 11th October 2019 via video conference under the chairmanship of Dr. the Right Honourable Keith Mitchell. The Monetary Council received the Financial Stability Report for the ECCU for the period January to September 2019. The report revealed that the ECCU's financial system remained broadly stable during the first nine months of 2019. The report also indicated that the financial sector continued to experience growth as evidenced by the rise in both assets and deposits, the credit growth had become more sustained and broad-based across sectors. Council noted that growth remained resilient at the ECCU level despite international conditions. Key contributing factors to growth include an increase in tourism arrivals, higher public and private sector investments and an increase in government consumption. Meantime the ECCB is ramping up support for climate resilience in the region, expanding discussions by St. Lucia's Prime Minister on the world stage. Honourable Alan Shasne has been lobbying the global community for actionable change in how it engages the region in the areas of financing post-disasters over the last two years beginning during his tenure as chairman of the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States OECS in June of 2017 and now as chairman of the Caribbean community. Lisa Joseph has more on that. So if we don't build the physical resilience to reduce the amount of economic impact and chaos that the storm causes, then we become uninsurable. So a good friend of mine who has a hotel in Dominica, his insurance went up 600%. 600%. So it's now 20% of his operating cost. There's no model in which you can pay 20% of your operating cost for insurance. That's just not viable and that's now and since that hurricane nothing has happened. Prime Minister the Honourable Alan Shasne speaking at the World Economic Forum's Sustainable Development Impact Summit on September 23, 2019. Honourable Shasne was a panelist at the summit which discussed transforming markets redesigning today's economic models. St. Lucia's Prime Minister at that forum brought to the fore the stark realities of small island states like St. Lucia as they take on the Hekulian journey to climate resilience. Honourable Shasne's note to the World Economic Forum is one that has resonated with the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, the ECCB. In fact, Governor Timothy Antoine says there must be heightened discussion in the region on insurance and financial protection. Speaking at the launch of the ECCB's Financial Information Month on September 30, 2019, the ECCB Governor stressed that as the region strives to become the first climate resilience zone in the world, the issue of financial resilience is of paramount importance. Insurance which is essentially a form of risk transfer ought to be seen and properly recognised as a key element in our region's resilience framework. As we speak, about two-thirds of natural disaster losses in the Caribbean are uninsured. I repeat, two-thirds of natural disaster losses in the Caribbean are uninsured. At the household level, many homes are uninsured or uninsured. Some suggest only about 25% of our household stock may be adequately insured. Governor Antoine indicated that the financial protection gap in the Eastern Caribbean presents a major impediment to sustained development and shared prosperity. We cannot start over our development every time we experience a natural disaster, medical problem or financial reversal. Instead, we ought to position ourselves to bounce back quickly, the classic definition of resilience, to bounce back quickly after we've been hit by the storms of life which inevitably come. This concern by the ECCB's Governor was highlighted by Hon. Balchance, when he addressed the 74th session of the United Nations Journal Assembly on September 27, 2019, as he recounted the devastation wrought on the region by Hurricanes Irma, Maria and most recent Dorian. Against that backdrop, Hon. Balchance announced a new partnership between St. Lucia and the World Economic Forum as the island strives to be the first country to implement a country-financing roadmap, CFR. The CFR is a platform to support countries in making a transformative shift from funding to financing. It will harness the collective intelligence from the WEF's expansive networks and promote consensus on the main challenges that limit capital flows to St. Lucia. It will also leverage coordinated action to move from a holistic diagnostic to a country-specific tangible action plan. We are grateful for this opportunity to be the test case for this initiative and look forward to its success and once successful to be replicated across other states. The Governor of the ECCB says Financial Information Month throughout October offers all the platform to discuss openly the challenges and opportunities of financial stability. The theme for the Month's observance is Plan for Uncertainty, Make Insurance Your Priority. From the Government Information Service, Lisa Joseph reporting.


FPS, I will check both of them out. From my point of view, NATO is mostly toothless, so I'm curious to learn how they are the aggressor. I'm also curious to learn how Russia's actions will be justified. NATO now is regarded as being toothless other than they have nuclear weapons, but NATO is not toothless, right? NATO has resulted, the aggression of NATO towards Russia has resulted in the annihilation of a country, 500,000 dead Ukrainians, hundreds of thousands maimed, 50,000 dead Russians, tens of thousands Russians maimed, economic collapse of Germany, economic demise of Europe, United States running deficits that are last budget, the best 1.7 trillion dollars. Canada is economic like in the wasteland now. The homeless here are unbelievable how many homeless we have here. Meanwhile, Canada was sending six billion dollars to Ukraine. NATO is not toothless in regards of how much destruction it's unleashing across the globe, right? NATO is toothless in regards to what it was hyping itself to be, the most powerful military in the world, right? NATO is how many members? I don't know, it's got most of Western Europe, Canada, United States, Australia, New Zealand I think is in there, Iceland is in there, which is like lowest IQ thing you ever saw in your life, right? You got a, I don't know how many countries in NATO and Russia just annihilated the NATO proxy army. So in that regards, yes, NATO is toothless, but NATO wasn't regarded to be toothless two years ago. Russia just showed the world that Western world is on the verge of collapse and it is collapsing.  The veil has been lifted and what we're seeing right now is the repercussions of what's happening, right? For example, let's do another update, let's do another update of our global map.


Hey time here and welcome to my YouTube channel where I talk about open source IT business and do some tutorials and talk about some of the tools that we use day-to-day in our business and Just some of the things we do we also showcase some of our projects And I love talking to other technicians reaching out to them and collaborating with other projects So if you like the content here go ahead and subscribe and thank you for visiting and sometimes we zap things with electricity


how to know if the narcissist is cheating on you this test will help you to identify if the narcissist is cheating on you it will help you to identify if the narcissist is in a committed relationship with you and only you or if they're seeking validation from other sources of supply this test will tell you everything you need to know about the narcissist it will tell you if it's time for you to get rid of them everything you need to know about the narcissist is hidden in their phone their phone will tell you everything you need to know about them think about when you last looked at the narcissist phone when did you last see what they were doing on there to test whether or not the narcissist is cheating on you you just have to look at their phone they can hide behind their false image they're very good at deceiving people but you don't really know what they're doing if they're always hiding their phone from you that's a good sign that they may be cheating on you but it's not enough proof it's not enough to confirm your suspicions about them so you need to check their phone you need to see who they're talking to but you don't want to do this doing an argument the best time to do this is when you're having a good time when you're both calm and relaxed because that's when you're really going to be able to identify whether or not the hide is something from you ask them to exchange phones with you for an hour and then pay attention to their reaction because that will tell you all you need to know especially if they walk away from you because that means they're trying to delete messages or block phone numbers so try to keep them engaged don't let them walk away but if they do walk away from you that means that they do have something to hide or they will try to make you feel like there's something wrong with you checking their phone as though you're invading their privacy or they will tell you you're just being paranoid they will say that you don't trust them they will try to make you feel like you're doing something wrong because they know that they're doing something wrong but if they do that that's a good thing for you because then you're not going to waste any more of your time and energy on them you can invest your time somewhere else if you ask the narcissist to exchange phones and they get angry or upset that should tell you all you need to know some narcissists may even break up with you if you ask them to do that because the validation they get from the other sources of supply means more to them than you do but when you give them this test no matter how they respond it will be in your favor because even if you find out that they are cheating on you it will set you free you will know what you need to do next if you find out that the narcissist is cheating on you you should not invest any more of your time with them because that shows that they do not respect you that shows that they do not value your relationship if the narcissist has nothing to hide from you they will give you their phone but the phone isn't that important it's their reaction that should tell you what you need to know if they try to make you feel like you're doing something wrong if they tell you that you don't trust them which is why this test is very important because it will tell you if you should waste any more of your time and energy with them when you give narcissists this test most of them will fail but it's good to do this test because then you can be sure it will tell you whether or not the narcissist is loyal and committed to you thank you for watching I hope this video resonated with you please like comment share and subscribe if you would like to donate my paypal link is in the video description coaching inquiries you can email me at coaching at narks have I ever go to UK thank you for watching I don't talk to you soon


It follows the philosophy of a starfish organization. We have independent working cells that are all subscribed to a given philosophy about how to get things done. There is a format for how things get organized, how things get put together, and it's up to that community to organize and decide how to represent that spark. These are organizing groups that also come out with key content areas. SparkCon is definitely a bit on the open source platform because it allows us to bring in folks with smaller expertise to create something much bigger than we could by programming or planning it all ourselves. We have a lot of collaborations happening with artists. This with us, it's with artists and engineers or artists and programmers and stuff like that. So it's kind of, or technology and artistry is kind of converging together. But even within the sparks, there's a lot of collaborations. So artists are getting with musicians and creating something, or graffiti artists are getting together with the bar people so they can have some kind of explosion event or something like that. So there's a lot of cross-pollination going on, so I think that's the most exciting thing is kind of seeing these people coming from different areas and coming together. I think at first it was sort of hard for people to understand. It was hard for us to describe, sometimes it was embarrassing, you know, this commitment to process over content. Open source has been great for us that the idea that the community decides ultimately what the content is that gets generated and that's what we've been dedicated to, that same spirit. And I think now because there's other people doing that in different strata, it's been great because I think people are beginning to understand that we're dedicated towards process. Open is something new every day during SparkCon because there's no way I can even imagine what folks are out there doing in the creative community so they can bring their little bit and add it to what happens over those four days. Openness is very important to SparkCon because we want to see what's out there. We want to use it as a showcase of the Triangles talent. So if we're open to new ideas and new artists and new performers and new organizers, that showcase just becomes more real and a better storytelling arm of what the creative community is doing. The more people we have locally that are helping us, the better. And it's not only being involved as a volunteer or as an organizer, it's, you know, participate with your work.


Welcome back everybody, I think this is going to be a short video. This is mostly just to describe a little bit of some tricks or potentially confusing things about looking at drawings of amino acid molecules. So on one of the very first slides covering chapter 16, I showed you this and I said this is a generic amino acid molecule, I said the amino acid molecules will always have an amine functional group, they will always have a carboxylic acid functional group, they will always have a carbon in the middle, that carbon in the middle will always have a hydrogen stuck onto it and then some other stuff will be stuck onto that carbon in the middle as well and this other stuff makes the amino acid molecules different from each other. The problem with this drawing is that sometimes students can think oh okay, every time I see an amino acid, the carboxylic acid part will be pointing to the east, it will be pointing that way or to the right I guess, the amine functional group will always be pointing to the left, the hydrogen that's stuck on the carbon in the middle will always be pointing up and the side chain will always be pointing down. It doesn't have to be that way and it won't be that way on a quiz or a test. I can rotate this thing any way I want and you should still be able to figure out where everything is, right here the carboxylic acid is kind of pointing to the northeast, the amine functional group is pointing to the southeast, the R group is pointing in a weird way but this is still an amino acid and you should be able to recognize it even if it's twisted and bent, I can twist and bend it in many different ways. Another thing is that this is especially true in biology textbooks, a lot of times instead of drawing this, this is called a carboxylic acid functional group, people will draw a carboxylic acid like this, now this doesn't look anything like that, it has the one carbon, two oxygens, and a hydrogen but it doesn't show you the double bond and it doesn't show you who is connected to whom but this has done a lot of the time. So the reason that I'm pointing this out is because sometimes it's just shown to you and I want to emphasize something, if you ever see the atoms written in this pattern this is chemistry shorthand for carboxylic acid. It's just easier to write than all of this so people write it like this. The real reason it's written like this is a financial reason and that is back 100 years or so ago when scientists wanted to publish something and they wanted to show a molecule like this, the printers charged a lot of money to put this kind of thing in print because this is complicated, the printers did not charge so much money if you just wrote all of the letters like this. So the people who are doing this kind of stuff, one of the things they said is look we want to save money as long as we write it this way, as long as everybody is on board this is always going to mean that the atoms are connected like this and then we can save a little bit of money and as long as everybody is clued in you know that this means carboxylic acid and it's kind of stuck. There is another chemistry teacher who sometimes teaches at Goodwin who absolutely despises this but it gets used a lot so I'm just telling you. Another thing much earlier in the course I showed you a formula like this and I said oh this is the formula for acetic acid. In the beginning of the course I said how many carbons are there, oh there are two, how many oxygens there are two, how many hydrogens there are four and this was a cautionary tale.  Why do I have to write it like this? Hopefully now that you will see that when you write COOH here this is telling chemists who have been trained that the C, the O, the O and the H are connected to each other in a carboxylic acid. You could write CH4O2 that's the same formula as this thing here but this doesn't tell you that there is a carboxylic acid in there somewhere. Anyway that's a long winded way of showing you different ways that the amino acid molecules can be presented. There is one more thing on the next slide. In most liquids, in most water based liquids including your cells and other body fluids, the carboxylic acid of the amino acid and the amine functional group of the amino acid are actually charged. What do I mean by that? This is the amino acid molecule the way that I have been drawing it, in other words it looks like this but if you put this molecule into water most of these molecules will not look like this. The reason is this is an acid and if you remember our definition of acids is acids are able to donate H+. If you put this into water this H will get donated it will fly away, it will move away and what will end up happening is this oxygen because this H plus got released this oxygen will have a negative charge. So if you put an amino acid molecule like this into water most of the time that H leaves and so that little part of the molecule has a negative charge. The other thing is that this part of the molecule can act like a base and if you remember what bases do they can accept H+. So if you put this kind of molecule into water a lot of times this part will pick up an H+. It will end up with a third hydrogen, it will end up with a plus charge. The point I am trying to make is that sometimes when people draw amino acid molecules and textbooks they draw them like this. If you look there is no electrical charge written on any single atom here but this is not really the most realistic way that the molecules exist in your body, in your cells. Usually this H flies off and usually this part of the molecule picks up another H+.  This oxygen here used to have a hydrogen stuck on to it but that left and it has a negative electrical charge and most of the amino acid molecules in your body are like this. But sometimes they are drawn like this which is how I drew it at the beginning. Sometimes they are drawn like this which is slightly more realistic. You don't need to know this word, that is a German word that has to do with the electrical charges here but don't worry about it. If you were paying close attention and you might not have been paying close attention, if you are paying close attention when I showed you the 20 universal amino acid molecules you will notice that they were drawn with the electrical charges. They had the hydrogen leave there and give you a negative charge. They had the third hydrogen stick on to this nitrogen here and you can see the positive electrical charge. Your book is trying to draw the amino acids in the more realistic way. So you should be aware that sometimes it will be drawn like this and sometimes it will be drawn with the charges. I think that is the end of this video.


The domain-specific language DSL is a computer language specialized to a particular application domain. This is in contrast to a general-purpose language GPL which is broadly applicable across domains. There are a wide variety of DSLs, ranging from widely used languages for common domains, such as HTML for webpages, down to languages used by only one or a few pieces of software, such as MuchSoft code. DSLs can be further subdivided by the kind of language, and include domain-specific markup languages, domain-specific modeling languages more generally, specification languages and domain-specific programming languages. General-purpose computer languages have always existed in the computer age, but the term domain-specific language has become more popular due to the rise of domain-specific modeling. Simpler DSLs, particularly ones used by a single application, are sometimes informally called mini-languages. The line between general-purpose languages and domain-specific languages is not always sharp, as a language may have specialized features for a particular domain but be applicable more broadly, or conversely may in principle be capable of broad application but in practice used primarily for a specific domain. For example, Perl was originally developed as a text-processing and glue language for the same domain as Auk and Shell scripts, but was mostly used as a general-purpose programming language later on. By contrast, PostScript is a Turing-complete language, and in principle can be used for any task, but in practice is narrowly used as a page description language.