Hi everybody, this is Dave Vellante, and we're here live at Wikibon Headquarters in Marlboro, Massachusetts. This is theCUBE, where we extract the signal from the noise, bring you the smartest people that we can find, and put the information in front of you, our audience. And it's hard to believe, but 2012 has almost come and gone. It's December 18th. This past year was the year that cloud became a reality. You remember the hype around cloud, and a lot of skepticism around cloud? Well, it really became mainstream in 2012. There was a ton of action around Flash, particularly in the startup area that we covered extensively here at Wikibon and Silicon Angle. Converged infrastructure, which was a, really a two or a three horse race between VCE and HP and Oracle. Now everybody's hopped on the converged infrastructure bandwagon. Big data is really hitting its stride, and there's a lot of activity there, and we continue to see industry consolidation, and bring your own devices, all the trends. So here we are in the end of 2012, and we thought it would be a good idea to look forward to 2013. So I enlisted a couple of my friends to do that. Chuck Hollis and Tom Roloff of EMC Corporation. Gentlemen, thanks very much for coming on theCUBE. Pleasure to be here. Say thanks for the invite. So Chuck, of course you have a lot of experience and predictions. You write a blog in every year. You make some predictions. So we're going to tap. Some of them are actually, you know, it's amazing. We can spend some time evaluating the past one. Yeah, batting, batting. But let's look forward. Yeah. And Tom, we appreciate you coming in. You've got the real CIO perspective. I know you spend a lot of time talking to IT executives. So we're going to basically, you know, run the gamut here. So let's start with the macro trend. What do you, let's start with you, Chuck. What are you seeing with the macro trends? What are your predictions for 2013? Well, if you look at what the analysts are telling us, they're telling us IT spent in 2013 is just a little north of what we saw in 2012. So, you know, resources are tight. The economy's in tight. You know, my guess is the first half of 2013 will look a lot like the second half of 2012. That being said, I think we've both seen some very hot pockets where people are investing deeply. I've come across a number of health care providers are investing heavily. Certain industries are investing in mobile. So even though the aggregate picture might not be, you know, the rosiest in the world, there certainly are some hot spots. I don't know, Tom, anything else? Yeah, no, I'd agree. I think, you know, I think first of all, people are looking to shift spent, right? We talked about this a little bit over the year, right, from running the business and keeping the lights on to helping to create new revenue streams and enabling the business in new ways. That pie has been, you know, 75, 25, keep the lights on for a long time. And I think, I think all enterprises and all the CIOs I'm talking to is, what can I do to get that part that's keeping the lights on to be more efficient? How do I free up dollars to go reinvent myself? And maybe that allows me to keep a similar size budget, but to deploy it in very different ways. So I think there's a cost reduction over here, investment over there kind of conversation going on. Yeah, the other thing I've noticed is that tough economic times tend to accelerate transitions. If you were thinking about investing a new way of doing things to save money or create new value, nothing like having it be bad weather outside to make that move around a little faster. So what are you guys assuming for IT growth? Are we talking three to 4% based on your radar? Yeah, I think it's gonna vary by industry, but I think, you know, low to mid single digits is kind of what everybody's been telling us. I'll tell you that I think larger corporations are trying to do more with less. I see some of the smaller medium sized companies maybe saying, hey, I've got opportunities to really invest strongly here. Healthcare is a hot area right now. Time to double down, right? So again, I don't think the aggregate pattern is particularly interesting. It's when you sort of decompose it to individual industry, individual segments that it really gets really interesting. So my observation would be that IT growth is really tied to GDP now. They're much more in lock step. And so the prediction that I would make for 2013 is the rich get richer. And what I mean by that is if you look at the IT business, it's really becoming oligopoly. You've got five or six or seven players, you know, IBM, HP, Dell, EMC and VMware, Oracle, Cisco, Intel and Microsoft, you put in there. Small club. Yeah, that essentially act as a big group of people that own a lot of the market. So we're all good friends. And yes, well, put it this way, you all watch what each other is doing. So one move, VMware's acquisition of NYSERA creates this ripple effect. And so I would predict that the rich get richer, that that oligopoly actually gains share in 2013. Well, certainly, in constrained environments, I don't think IT customers have the ability to go out and do a lot of window shopping. They've got to be able to buy prefab, ready to execute solutions. And the idea of taking six months to kind of create your own, whatever. That's not a lot of spare resources to do that. Yeah, I mean, I think CIOs are sitting there saying, can I actually consolidate my vendor base more? Yeah. They're saying, I've got a lot of different guys to go manage here. I want to count on a few. I wanted to have them do more for me. And I'm always going to experiment on the fringes here, but when it comes to the core partners that I'm working with, I can't afford to manage 20 of them. Can I get it down to five or six? I put SAP in your bucket there. Microsoft is a part of the enterprise more and more. And I think CIOs are asking themselves, I'm going to need a certain apps. And then when I get down into platforms and infrastructures, how do I actually bet on the right guys? So let's talk about a corollary of that trend, which is service providers. People try to consolidate vendors. One way to do that is to look to a service provider for a certain cloud app. So what are you guys seeing in the service provider space? Well, I'm seeing more behaviors around before we just assume we're going to go do this ourselves as part of the project analysis for whatever it is they're doing, let's go look at external options. Whereas a year or two, I think the prevalence was, no, there may not be anything out there. That's what it is, we wouldn't want it.  I don't know if you've seen some of that. Yeah, I think so with a broad definition service provider, including softwares of service, as well as any workload that you might be moving somewhere else. A year ago, I saw a lot of fear, FUD in the enterprise market around, I'm not sure I want to move all that stuff out there. I don't really know. I think what's happened in the past year is people have done it without really asking themselves the security question. So it's really gone out into service providers, public clouds, much faster really than it did in the 2011 timeframe. I think this is the year of reckoning on that, to be honest with you. I think the robustness of the platform and the availability and the trustworthiness of the platform is gonna get tested. And I think CIOs are gonna sit there and step back from this halfway through the year and say, can I really afford to set critical workloads out to these guys? Or do I need to go create trustee relationships with a few service providers and sort of double down on that in the same way that maybe that oligopoly we were talking about was doubling down on it. But back to your point, I think we both would agree that unless IT brokers that relationship, service providers are your frenemies, right? They'd love to work with IT and if they don't, they certainly know who's consuming IT like the CMO and folks like that. So either have to broker the relationship and manage the discussion or buyers and sellers would fight each other. This is where you've been for a while, right? The idea that Amazon or public cloud is the new shadow IT, right? I mean, I think you've been saying that. I think CIOs in the enterprise have been hearing that and I think they're really starting to ask that question right now. What's actually out there and the service providers that my employees are leveraging and can I broker that and can I actually make sure that I'm comfortable with that? Cause the anecdotes about getting burned are out there and I think IT's gotta get involved. Well, I think too. So my prediction here is that Amazon's gonna get a lot more aggressive in the enterprise. You're gonna see that. I mean, things like Glacier is getting a lot of attention, you know, the penny per gigabyte per month. That's gonna catch a lot of CFOs, eyes and ears. But I think there's gonna be another high profile outage and because of Amazon's big marketing push, I think people are gonna be more in tune with the risks associated with Amazon's cloud and I think that the enterprise guys, you guys, your customers, VMware's customers are gonna respond and specifically, I think their response is gonna be successful in areas of vertical markets. I think that's where you're gonna see the best response to Amazon's horizontal commodity approaches that certain service providers, for example, NYSE and financial services, CERN or in healthcare, you know, it depends, it's like USC in archives and other media and entertainment verticals will emerge and that's where they're gonna succeed against Amazon. Well, okay, so this is the debate that we're having internally. We agree with you about vertical oriented community call clouds. We can make a long list of models where that would work. The coin toss, at least in my mind, is does that go to an Amazon model or will it go to a purpose built set of cloud technologies? You mentioned NYSE Tech. They're not using an Amazon style model, they're using enterprise class IT. So I agree with you on the community cloud side, whether it all goes to a public commodity cloud or not, I think that's kind of a separate discussion. Yeah, I mean, I think large scale IT organizations see infrastructure as a service, as a stepping stone and a temporary thing. And to the extent that the public cloud is betting on cheaper infrastructure as a service as a value prop, I think that's pretty ephemeral and you gotta do more than that. I had a CIO just kinda nail it for me. He said, I look at Amazon and those guys as temp agencies. Nice to call them up when I'm short of few bodies, need a little help, wouldn't wanna build my entire workforce on temps. And I think that we have to realize those things are now just part of the mix. They're not a substitute for strategy but they're an enhancement to a strategy and knowing that there are nice variable services out there to consume adds to it. I thought this whole analogy around my temp workforce was probably pretty accurate. It helps you think about it the right way. It's a spot market for IT, right? Yeah, it's good. So you can get out there and get it when you need it, go get it but you gotta ask yourself is that really worth what you're taking on there? Yeah, I don't know about you but we're getting into winter here in New England. I'm not on the spot market for my heating oil. I prepaid. Yeah, so some people might try to arbitrage but it's a dangerous game. Yeah, go there if you want. All right, let's get into the tech discussion, right? I mean, we all love to talk about the technologies. Let's start with big data. I mean, Gardner talks about the hype cycle. We've got to be close to, if not, a little bit beyond the peak of the hype cycle. What are your predictions, Chuck, in big data? Well, I think last year it was all about data science, data scientists and the tools for them. I think in 2013 we'll kind of go one level down from a hierarchy and see a broadcast of analytically enabled executives, managers, leaders. We're taking a subset of what the data scientists do and applying it more to business problems. Five data scientists is good but I think there's room for 50, 500, even more analytically enabled managers, leaders, executives, whatever you want to call them in an organization. I call it the democratization of big data in the enterprise in 2013. That's an interesting way to put it, Chuck. You know, I think that big data has been an IT push and I think that's got to change. You know, there's, we're at the top of the hype cycle from the IT person's perspective around big data because I think every CIO believes this is a way to go become more relevant to the business. But I think IT needs to do more to engage the business in that conversation and get the business to appreciate what's possible in ways that I really haven't seen them do this past year, right? What can we aggregate and what interesting things can we do with that aggregation? I think we got to get to the point where we're turning that into less of an IT push and more of a business pull.  As I meet with these folks, this stuff is R&D. It's rocket science. They don't want to be talking about this to the press. They're not going to talk to us vendors. So I've been amazed about how many people are actually doing things as opposed to the small number of people who are willing to talk about what they're doing. So I think this is actually moving a little faster, a little harder than we might give ourselves credit for. And sometimes it'll come under the rubric of analytics or BI, it might not be classical big data. We'll all come to know and love it. But it's the rare customer that I meet that isn't doing something in this area. So I think that, I guess my prediction in this area is you're not going to see a red hat of big data. And as a result, I think one of the big platform vendors, either Cloudera or MapR, is going to have some kind of exit either IPO, but I don't think they're there in terms of IPO. I just don't think the financials are going to support that. So I'm predicting one of those will get taken out. It's a bit of a long shot, but either Cloudera or MapR will get taken out. And that will create a ripple effect because there'll be this feeding frenzy of people who think that there will be a red hat of Linux. So that's my sort of big data prediction. I kind of move my prediction elsewhere in the value chain. I think the action is going to be in community-based clouds doing purpose-built analytics for consumption, the travel industry, the energy industry, the healthcare industry. So you take the cloud model, you start thinking about predictive analytics and service provider models in for a particular industry. I think that party's just starting in 2013. Well, I guess the other point I would make there is there's a lack of applications, packaged applications and big data. And I think that rather than see a bunch of packaged applications come out in 2013, I think we're going to see some platforms where people will actually produce development platforms and two APIs will actually put that infrastructure in place. I think 2013 is going to be the setup year to actually enable some of those applications to be developed down the road. People want to consume the stuff. They don't want to handcraft it. If I can go to a nice, well-lit place that has all the data and all the tools I need for my industry, plus a community of data science professionals to help me, boy, that seems a lot more attractive than spending five times as much to try to do that. Without having to be a map-reduced expert. That's really the attractor. You and I probably could learn R if we sat down. R, yes. I'll put it for you. What are you going to see in 2013 in the spaces that applications and big data are going to converge in a way that they haven't, right? If you're an enterprise today and you want to go consume big data, you want to insert it into a business process in real time, you've got to change an application that's running the bank the way it's being run today. That application that you have that's a legacy app can't consume big data in the way you want it to, which makes big data an analytical rather than in a transactional business process or anything. I think you're going to see that change this year. Well, interesting, I think actually just another trend I think we'll see is that the transaction databases will start to feed the analytical databases in real time and I think you'll start to see that really take shape. You've seen it now in ad networks. I think you'll start to see it in more use cases in 2000 years. I think Tom's point is pretty valid because, okay, I found my crystal ball. I now know about a new business process that's analytically enabled. Let's go build one. To your point, the first thing I want to do is start sourcing data from all these legacy systems of warp speed. They weren't designed to do that. I want to be doing decisioning as quickly as possible in memory, some of those technologies. And I think Tom and I would both agree. In fact, I think our executives agree that there's going to be this new cast of application tools and application methodologies that don't look like what we're doing today to build these next generation predictor analytics. Now, there's going to be some infrastructure to support that. One which is flash, you mentioned in memory. There's a big debate now going on about in memory versus memory extensions using flash and the economics of that and the trade-offs and so forth. Let's start with you again, Chuck. What are you seeing in flash? What's your prediction there? Well, it's kind of funny. We've been talking about flash and storage since 2008 when we first started shipping flash drives in the Symmetrics. And in 2013, I think people are going to have to think twice before they do a disk-based type storage implementation. Yeah, for archival and content depots and that sort of thing. But I think everyone's going to gravitate to either all flash or mostly flash and how they think about storage going forward. The costs have come down. There's now tiering within flash. In 2013, we're going to see real-time D-dub, which will get the cost down even further. Anybody who's ever owned a MacBook Air knows what flash can do for your performance. It's just pretty hard to stare at a disk array now and say, yeah, I can live with classical disks for this SAP process or something. I don't know. I think the other thing I'll predict for you that flash will drive is that we'll start to question where the value is in the storage stack. Is it in the fact that I've got whatever, the right combination of disk? Or is it in the fact that I can manage and orchestrate all the different levels that I need to when I need them in real time with an intelligent approach? And I think flash is giving another tier to that and is putting a lens on the software, really. That's behind what storage has become. And I think in 2013, we're going to get really confused because what is a server? What is a storage array? To your point, those lines start blurring very clearly. So we put a very modern storage proposal in people these days. There's server elements, network elements, and array elements. And all of these are going to start mushing together pretty quickly here. You also see this reflected organizationally. I see server and storage teams starting to come together. It used to be the storage guys over on one side and the server guys on the other side. They never went to lunch together. Now they're having to come together because these technologies are meshing very, very tightly. Yeah, and I think that you're going to see the redefinition of the classical tier one reliability, availability of service ability. That's morphing with this tier zero. And it's multi-tenancy, mixed workloads. And I think that Flash is going to start to drive new levels of productivity, bottom line productivity of the organization as opposed to just cost. And there's a whole bunch of things that we had to learn in the disk world, like storage data placement on disk drives. Just don't exist in Flash. So at least we'll find at least the storage professionals are going to have to unlearn a lot of stuff and relearn the things that are now important in this new world. OK, how about security? Tom, let's start with you. What's your crystal ball say about security in 2013? I think security has been this term that's about, how do I, first of all, secure the data center was a conversation. Then we talked about identity and access management information. I think we're broadening the definition of security significantly, and I think enterprises are starting to look at maybe not just security, but trust in the information infrastructure. And I think people are using terms around business continuity, disaster recovery, backup, recovery, and archiving as part of a broader conversation about how I secure my information. So I think you'll see that conversation shift to an extension of backup, recovery, business continuity, disaster remediation, identity management, access management, security in the sense of information security, and ultimately also compliance and how we prove to people that we're actually living by the policies and the regulatory environments that we're all under. So I think that conversation gets much broader in 2013. And I think CIOs and CISOs are going to start taking that all together. I look at it kind of the same way Tom does, but from a different angle. We've all built business models in the physical world, and we've learned how to protect and secure and supply chains and all of that. We're reconstructing those same business models in the digital world around social and mobile and analytics and all of that. We need to be able to do business with the same confidence that we used to do in the physical world. So yes, it's security, but it's also availability and compliance and all these other things. My business is now a digital business. Can I do business with confidence and trust? If I were to double click on security, the big thing that I've seen is everybody, using different words, but it's basically big data analytics meets security. Can I use the same predictive techniques for using consumer behavior and energy distribution and all these other great business processes to better predict and react to the next security threat that's out there? And the security crowd is kind of interesting. They always, you know, they're a little different. They want to use different words and concepts.  You're just kind of doing it in a different area. They're very offended. They always like to use different words, but you are seeing that gross importing of concepts and methodologies from the data science world into the security world. It's happening pretty fast. All right, here's my layup prediction. I'm gonna get to the end of 2013. We're gonna look back and say, we're less secure than we are at the end of 2012. My question, Chuck, is will it matter? Yeah, I don't think we'll care. It's kind of funny. We've been talking about privacy and security and bad things happening for at least as long as I've been in computers, which is 30 years. Every year the risks get greater and every year we seem to care about it less. I think it'll be more of a narrowing and focusing on the risks that matter as opposed to avoiding all risks. If you look at security thinking four or five years ago, it's, oh my gosh, we gotta prevent everything everywhere all the time. Now it's like, well, we kind of presume somebody's inside our network. We kind of presume bad things are happening. How do we focus on the things that matter? So I think we'll care less, but the things we do care about, we're gonna care about a whole lot. Yeah, I'd add the one thing in there is that the regulatory environment across the world is heating up. And the things we're gonna care about are things that land us in jail. And so we are gonna worry, we are gonna worry about that part of the broad conversation. Well, I think it underscores too that the business value of these initiatives really brings enough far or wide to offset some of the risks and concerns. So more of the same there, although we're starting to see, as you say, the widening of the notion of security and really trying to attack the problem from a data standpoint, as opposed to just putting a wall around the queen when she wants to leave the castle. That's not gonna work anymore. All right, let's talk about IT organizations. Tom, this is something that you spend, it may be just business technology organizations, as you'd call it. You spend a lot of time at the intersection of business and technology. So what are you seeing for 2013? I'm gonna get two trends there. One is that I think, with Cloud Trust and Big Data, people are realizing this is not just a technology revolution. This is people process and technology. And that affects the way we run IT. That affects the way we organize IT. That affects the skill sets we need in IT. I think as Cloud and security and Big Data become more pervasive, people are reexamining the way that they organize and run IT. And I think you're gonna see that really take off next year. There's some tremendous technologies out there now. As they get absorbed and mainstreamed, it's gonna change the way that people take on the process and organizational side of IT. I've kind of seen that already happen. I mean, a year ago, we were talking, hey, you're gonna need new technology infrastructure to go do this. I think by now, everybody realizes you need a new operational model and a new consumption model to go with it. And those are the hard parts because that's people process and politics, right? They're not easy. That being said, I'm gonna have a sense of deja vu here. We are very proud of ourselves. Hey, Cloud, information is a service, blah, blah, blah. Remember what we used to call IT organizations back in the 60s and 70s? IS, information services. That's where the information came from the business needed to do it. So I almost see, we're coming around the lab again, that it's not about the technology in IT. It's about the services that the business needs to consume to run their next business model. So maybe we are going back to the main frame again. Yeah, I mean, I love the idea. And I think maybe to play off your IS-IT world, I think the focus in 2013 is gonna be on the eye in IT. Yeah, and the consumption model isn't through technology, it's delivering it as a service that everybody wants to consume. It's okay, so I would add to that. We always talk about the 70, 30 mix, 70% of IT investments are spent keeping the lights on, 30% on innovation. I think we get out of that morass by the CMO is actually gonna drive the information agenda. And actually, as it relates to innovation, actually spend more on innovation than the IT organization itself. So that would be my organization. I would certainly agree, CMOs are forcing functions. So put it all together. It's a digital world. We need a digital business model. Typically the marketing function is the one that's all into the social and the mobile and the analytics and all that. This is happening in our organization. So they're now coming to the IT guys and saying, look, I need to get a whole bunch of stuff done here really fast. It's not what you guys did two years ago. We're either gonna join together in a very tight partnership or we're gonna part ways right about now. And I like forcing functions. At the same time, I meet IT organizations that are looking to do new things in a new way with a new part of the organization. So in many ways, the marketing function becomes the first anchor tenant for the cloud, for the analytics, all of that. So I'm seeing kind of a, hey, we're trying to do things new way and we got a guy here who needs things, done new ways. We use this as the basis for reinventing how we do IT in our organization. And it's great when you see it. I don't know, any other thoughts? Yeah, no, I think starting with a customer and thinking back to what that means you need from an information perspective is a great way to go. And I think marketing is trying to get that, what's the 360 degree view of our customer? And how do we understand that customer better?  And I think it'll create a lot of value in the enterprise if marketing can start the ball rolling in that direction. Yeah, and at least I've seen it in our company and other companies as well. That partnership only feeds what marketing needs to get done very quickly, but also is the first anchor tenant that encourages IT to deliver new classes of services in new ways. So it's a win-win when you find it. Excellent, okay, last, I'll give you guys the last word, actually I'll give myself the last word, I'm gonna start with you. Sure, sure. So surprises in 2013 or any last predictions that you'd like to make? I think I put most of them in my blog. I think what we always get surprised with is how fast this is all happening around us. I'll point to the Digital Universe study, and I don't know if you tracked what IDC did. Yeah, it's just a demo. A year ago they said, well, by the end of the decade we're gonna be at 35 zettabytes. Last year they said, no, no, we were wrong, by the end of the decade we're gonna be at 40 zettabytes. So look at this, in one year they've taken their forecast for the end of the decade of five zettabytes. So we keep undershooting how quickly all this stuff is happening by an order of magnitude, and that's what impresses me, just as how quickly we get this wrong and move on to the next thing. You know, my prediction, and I won't get very specific about this, but I think what you're seeing is the acceleration of technology. There are some firms, and we talked about a bunch of them in the beginning, right, who are the trusted IT firms for the enterprise. Some are keeping up and some are not. And I think 2013 we'll see the winner take all, as you suggested early on. We'll see an example of how that really happened. You know, we saw it with Oracle buying Sun a few years ago. We saw the beginnings of winners and consolidators and consolidates. I think we're gonna see at least one of those companies that you mentioned early on being a very different corporate structure by the end of 2013. Oh, a big prediction. Okay, I would say, just picking up on that theme, Tom, that software is gonna be the defining characteristic of those winners. And we call it at Wikibon, it's still gonna go software-led infrastructure. I know VMware calls it software-defined. I think that's actually gonna happen a lot faster than people realize. I think that it's more than just marketing. And I think that, you know, the basic premises you're layering, services on top of commodity and standardized hardware, that's really nothing new. I mean, Google's been doing that for a decade. What is new is metadata management. I think that people are gonna begin to realize that unifying metadata and actually having a single control point across the network, that's really gonna be server-led. Managing data from fast servers is gonna be a tectonic shift that we're gonna start to see emerge in 2013, so keep your eye on that. Gentlemen, thank you very much for coming on theCUBE and making this really easy for me. I really appreciate you sharing your insights with our community. This is Dave Vellante at Wikibon.org. This is theCUBE. Thanks for watching, everybody. We'll see you next time.


Yo Isa, schoolboy football, no local, the youths are moving to international big league and I steal people out for the member which party start Isa, schoolboy football Through the formalities and give you the starting lineup for this Glenmure team Antoine Goudin will be in goal, they have a back four Brandon Wallace at left back Ramon Francis the Camperdown transfer is at right back and centre back Sunil Hedley and Tavon Coleman in the middle Jason White, Devoni Gordon and the very dangerous Kyle Gordon the player to watch with the Andre Johnson Tashon Cummins and Orain Watson up front they are coached by Andrew Peart, the captains now take centre stage Sejai Ashman for Manchester High he steps away and the officials go through their final moments as we get ready to have a look at the Manchester High lineup. Well for the second consecutive game Giovanni Bennett has been preferred in goal to Shamar Kamakou had quite a hauler of a game in the defeat against BB Koch they have a back four as well Rashid Harriot at left back Javis Lloyd at right back the captain Ashman along with Malachi Hudson in the centre of their defence Shameen Ham the England born Shamaya Salman and Ron Webu scored a beauty against BB Koch in the middle with Adrian Campbell Michael Reed and their leading scorer with 19 goals Javier Newman the front three Jamar Brown their second leading scorer with 11 goals and another influential player Tyrese Douglas are both out of the squad let's have a look at the match highlights then Oshane Nation getting the contest on the way Glenmere High on the front foot for most of this game and Deandre Johnson with a ferocious right footed drive well tipped over by Giovanni Bennett Manchester High had their moments in the first half this shot cleared by the player of the match Aneel Headley Kyle Gordon the captain well went for the spectacular he could have taken that down and then gone for a shot Johnson's cross not finding Aurene Watson or Tejon Cummings they kept dominating this first half this shot from Aurene Watson at the perfect hide for Giovanni Bennett to push away and the score remained at zero zero Manchester High another one of their moments late on the biggest save Antoine Gooden had to make him go Michael Reed with the right footed strike Gooden getting down well low to his left then in the 51st minute Jason White with a free kick from range there was some swirl onto it it caught Giovanni Bennett off guard and the entire Manchester High fraternity as Glenmere took the lead by a goal to Neal then in the 55th minute they would get a second ball slipped through for Aurene Watson who drove what looked like a relatively innocuous shot at Giovanni Bennett and the Manchester High number 40 didn't get down couldn't hold on and then Mir went up by two goals to Neal Aurene Watson the 16-year-old will be 17 on Saturday celebrating his sixth goal of the campaign 2-0 to Glenmere they made a number of changes Niren Allen one of the substitutes getting down the cross and then getting there in the nick of time to send it across but Tejon Cummings couldn't turn it home another rare opportunity for Manchester High that went over the top but this was a pretty dominant performance from Glenmere Aurene Watson again with another opportunity trying to go with the outside of the boot I think and went well wide of the mark and this shot at the whistle saved at the near post by Shamar Kamak who came on as a substitute replacing Giovanni Bennett final statistics then 19 shots for Glenmere five on target just five shots for Manchester two on target 17 falls in the contest 11 of them committed by Manchester High four yellow cards to a piece nine corners six for Manchester just three for Glenmere and Glenmere really dominating possession 70 to Manchester High's 30 percent here we have our water man of the match none other than Anil Henley congratulations Anil today you did a fantastic job on the pitch assess your performance in your words well it was a very good performance from me the team performed very well as yeah as we showed and it came out here and get the three points well you do have tough opponents to play in in very short order are you nervous to play them or is this a win giving you some confidence never nervous this win bring more confidence to the team and the last time Glenmere won a Dacosta Cup title was in 2012 do you think that this time around you guys can do it yes we will do it for sure okay thank you and all the best congratulations all right thanks and now we welcome the coach of Manchester High


Hello, I welcome you all once again to my channel, Explore Education. I am Dr. Rashmi Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Assistant Kanna Galshwari College, University of Palahava. And this time I am going to discuss a few issues over philosophy, you can say. In this semester, there is educational philosophy in which few topics are based on philosophy itself. There is nature, function, branches of philosophy, meaning of philosophy and relationship of philosophy and education. Then it comes to educational philosophy, that is, many naturalism, pragmatism, etc. So I have already covered nature, scope and function of philosophy. In this video, I will definitely cover branches of philosophy. So for starting point of view, I have a few slides over philosophy itself. So let's start with Darshan. What is philosophy? Darshan. Darshan Shastra. Philosophy is the mother of all sciences, means the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, truth, beauty, law, justice, validity, mind and language. So how can you get knowledge? What are the methods of knowledge? What is the truth? Is there a teacher or an ordinary teacher? Is my truth your truth? An or? Beauty, who are you going to call beautiful? What angle are you going to look at? Law. What is law? Are there universal laws? Don't there be universal laws? Everything. Justice. What is the definition of justice? How will you judge the other person's justice? Very DG. Mind, nature, knowledge, knowledge, and everything. Correct. What is the definition of justice? Justice. problems and philosophy. Moreover, philosophy is rational thinking of a more or less systematic kind about the general nature of the world. He is saying that you can say that the vision is a rational thinking. It is a systematic thinking. It is more or less systematic. But it is systematic. And he tells us about the general nature of the world. He talks about the nature of the world through metaphysics. He can also say that it is a theory of existence. The justification of belief. The justification of faith. Epistemology. The theory of knowledge. Knowledge of faith. The principle of knowledge. And the conduct of life. And the way of life. How to live, what is good, what is bad, what should be done, what should not be done. The ethics of life. The ethics of life. The theory of value. There should be an exeology here. There should be ethics here. There should be ethics here. So philosophy is rational thinking. The first thing we need to understand. The study of general and fundamental problems. And this rational thinking tells us about the facts. It tells us about the knowledge. It tells us about the mood. That is why the three main branches of philosophy. Metaphysics, epistemology and exeology. If you want to know the meaning of philosophy. Oxford, Collins, Deschnery said. That philosophy is a study. And creation of theories. About basic things. The nature of existence, knowledge, thought. And about how people should live. It says that Darshan, Tarsvik, Adhyan. And creation of theories. Or the principle of the principles. And who are the principles? About our existence. About the nature of knowledge. About thoughts. Or how should people live. So this is what we understood. Nature of existence. And how people should live. Exeology. And Plato. Plato said in his republic. Plato said. Or you can say. What is the philosophy according to Plato? Plato says. He who has a taste for every sort of knowledge. He who has a taste for every sort of knowledge. He who has a taste for every kind of knowledge. He who has a taste for every kind of knowledge. He who likes knowledge. And who is curious to learn. And who wants to learn. And is never satisfied. This should have been N more. And is never satisfied. Maybe term philosopher. They are saying. Sorry. What is Darshan Shastra? What is Darshanik? That person is Darshanik. Who likes every kind of knowledge. Who wants to learn a lot. And who is never satisfied with learning.  And he can learn more. So Darshanik is called in accordance to Plato. What is philosophy? It is a system of beliefs about reality. That means. System of beliefs. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. That means. So you should know that the difference between knowledge and wisdom is that the wisdom is higher than knowledge. Knowledge means you have knowledge. It is a very good thing. But if you come in the right direction in the way of using that knowledge, then you become very weak. So you can write all this on each page, on critical examination, on reality, on rational inquiry, on truth and wisdom. So you can say that you can't even write the word with the use of light words. So how difficult it is to put it in your life. Because there can be so much discussion on everything. What is reality? How is the critical examination going to be? What are the special features of rational inquiry? What is the truth? What is the wisdom? And how do we get wisdom? It is all so tough. Then definitions, some definitions, that is, some Darwinists have tried to define philosophy, like Aristotle says that philosophy is the science which investigates the nature of being as it is in itself. They are saying that it is the science which investigates the nature of being, that is, whatever it is, about its nature, whatever it is, whatever the world is, whatever people are, whatever life is, its science is the philosophy of the same kind of investigation. Radha Krishnan says that philosophy is a logical inquiry into the nature of reality. We are getting it again and again that philosophy is an inquiry, logical, rational, about reality. Again and again, everyone is defining it as a home trick. Spencer says that philosophy is concerned with everything as a universal sign. D.B. says critical reviewing of the familiar things. That is, when everyone talks about nature of reality, they say familiar things. They say familiar things, that is, the things you are familiar with. The things we are familiar with, that is, our inner guild. You will be familiar with them. The first thing to notice is the philosophy of the 15th century. The seller is saying that philosophy is persistent attempt to gain insight into the nature of the world and of ourselves by means of systematic reflections. He is saying that vision is a persistent attempt. That is, we are trying constantly to get insight into the nature of the world. That is, the nature of the world, that is, the nature of the world, is an attempt to get insight into the nature of the world. You will also find out about the world and about yourself and of ourselves. And how will you find out? We will reflect. We will reflect, we will reflect, we will reflect. And how will this happen? Everything will happen in a systematic way. That is, it will not be haphazard. It will happen in an polarized way. It will happen in a systematic way. So these are some definitions of philosophy. Then, features, definitions, meanings, and so on. We know a few characteristics of it. It is a set of views or beliefs about life and the universe, which are often held uncritically. They are saying that vision is a sample of the universe, a sample of faith. Who is the faith? About the universe, about the universe, about the universe, and about the universe. It is uncritical. You cannot criticise it. Then, philosophy is a process of reflecting and criticising our most deeply held conceptions and beliefs. The conceptions, beliefs in our hearts, criticising them in different angles, that can be wrong, or by reflecting them. It is a rational attempt to look at the world as a whole. The world is a holistic way of looking at it in a holistic way. It is a holistic way of looking at it in a holistic way. There are many ways of looking at it. It is a logical analysis of language. The study of language is a very disciplined study and it is very literate. Language is a logical analysis of the meaning of words and concepts and the clarification of the meanings of words and concepts. It is said that whatever word is used, whatever context is used, whatever context is used, the meaning of words and concepts will change. Language is a logical analysis of the meaning of words and concepts. It is a group of perennial problems that interest people and philosophers always have sought answers. When we are faced with a problem, we look at it from the Darshmikas or you answer the problem. So those problems that are coming and those people's interest problems, interest problems, the problems that we face, the solutions we get, the answers of all of them are always given by philosophers. These are some of the features of philosophy, whether it is philosophy or vision. Now let's talk about branches. Now you should be aware that there are three main aspects of philosophy. Tattva Mimansa, Gyaan Mimansa, Mooli Mimansa. Tattva Mimansa is called metaphysics, Gyaan Mimansa is called epistemology, Mooli Mimansa is called exeology. Exeology then increases in two parts, ethics and aesthetics. Ethics means from the bottom and aesthetics means from the bottom. So Tattva Mimansa, till now we have come to this level, at the level of BEA, BEH or even further. Generally people know that the study of questions concerning the nature of reality or existence, that is, that question is concerned with the nature of reality or existence. They are all part of metaphysics. Meaning, what is Tattva? What is Tath? That is metaphysics. That is its main cause. It is metaphysics. Then what is epistemology? The study of the nature of knowledge. The study of the nature of knowledge and how these are attained and evaluated. What is Gyaan Mimansa? It is the nature of Gyaan. You can understand Gyaan Mimansa so much. And how these are attained? Only Gyaan does not have the spiritual power and this also tells Gyaan Mimansa how you can get Gyaan, how you can understand it. Then what is exeology? The study of the question of value. Exeology is to be taken from the question of value. It deals with issues of value in the following areas. In the area of ethics and in the area of aesthetics. What will be in the area of ethics? The study of moral principles. That is, it is about ethics. What is kinetics? What is the rational ground? What is good conduct? What should do and what should not to do? All of this is to be taken from the study of ethics. And aesthetics. You can call it Sondarya Shastra. The study of the nature and value of works of art and the aesthetic experience. It is a very beautiful painting. It is a very beautiful painting. It is a very beautiful painting. It is the reflection of all of them. And to find the value in it. What is the good to beauty, goodness and what is it? Okay. Now let's talk about Metaphysics. We will study Metaphysics so much and leave. And if we know, then our work will go on. That this is a concern with the questions of nature of reality in existence. But the questions of reality that are being asked. You can share them in 4 categories. Cosmological, Theological, Anthropological and Ontological. What is the meaning of Cosmological? It is taking it from Brahmand. Theological means taking it from Dharmasastra. It will be related to Ishwar. It is related to Brahmand in science. It is related to Anthropological. It is related to Manusya. It is related to Ontology. It is related to existence. It is related to Vasthu. It is related to Nature of existence. So, Ontology and Metaphysics sometimes get confused. Because Nature of existence is also related to Metaphysics. You can understand that Ontology is the subject of Metaphysics. Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that studies the ultimate nature of reality of existence. It has been cleared. Metaphysical questions are the most basic asks because they provide the foundation upon which all subsequent enquiries are based. They are saying that the questions of Manusya are the most basic because the rest of the enquiries are based on that. They are saying that Metaphysical questions may be rewired into four subsets. They are saying that the questions of Manusya are the most basic. First, it is related to Brahmand. Cosmology consists in the study of theories about the origin, nature and development of the Universe. That is, how did Brahmand come into existence? What was the first life in Brahmand? How did Brahmand's existence take place? How did the Universe originate and develop? All these questions will come to the Cosmology as soon as we get to it. The second aspect is the theological question. It is related to religion. Theology is part of religious theory. It deals with the conceptions of and about God. Is there a God? Is there God? What are the rules of God? What rules are the rules of God? Can you see God? Can you see God? These kinds of questions will come to the theological question. Anthropological questions are related to Manusya.  What is the relation between mind and body? What is the difference between the mind and body? Does the mind work on the body? Or does the body work on the mind? These kinds of questions. The fourth aspect of metaphysics is the ontological. What is ontological? It is the study of nature of existence or what it means for anything to exist. That is, it is related to facts. The questions related to facts are related to ontology. Like, is basic reality found in matter or physical energy? Or is it found in spirit or spiritual energy? Like, is basic reality found in matter or physical energy? Or is it found in spirit or spiritual energy? These kinds of questions will come to the ontology. Then, metaphysics and education. What is the connection between metaphysics and education? Metaphysics or the issue of ultimate reality is central to any concept of education. That is, how is the focus of education of metaphysics? Because it is important for the educational program of the school to be based on facts and reality. We are told that your school program will be based on facts and reality. Metaphysics is a speculative and focuses on issues such as the nature of causative relationships. It relates to teaching in terms of thoughts about educational goals, the selection of appropriate content and educational goals and attitudes towards the general nature of learners. He is saying that, in fact, the whole core of the course is education. Because it tells us what your goal will be. It will teach us what your goal will be. What content will be chosen for it. All these things are to be taken from metaphysics. Then, epistemology. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge and is also referred to as theory of knowledge. Did you understand that science is important? You can say that it was the principle of science. It is to be taken from science. It is the study of the nature, source and validity of knowledge. The nature, nature and the nature of the epistemology. It covers two areas. Mainly, it covers two areas. The content of thought. That is, the thought process. What is the subject of the thought and the thought itself. That is, the subject of the thought. It is to be taken from two things of epistemology. And in educational terms, it is to be taken from curriculum. What will be taught in Particram and instruction or content and method? Which method will be taught? And what will be taught in Particram? Why? Because Particram will culminate in the knowledge. Then, epistemology is sources of knowledge. They are saying that, we need to gain knowledge. What are the ways to gain knowledge? What are the ways to gain knowledge? What are the ways to gain knowledge? There are many ways to gain knowledge. First, you should know that many people talk about whether they can know the truth. So, we believe that we can know the truth. That is why we will talk about the sources of knowledge. So, the first source is senses. Empirical. We get knowledge through the senses. Central to most people's answer to that question is empiricism. Empiricism means the knowledge that you get through your senses. Second source of knowledge throughout the span of human history has been revelation. Which has been revealed to us. Like, the knowledge of religion which has been told to us that these things are true and these things are true we have accepted it as it is. So, the first knowledge we got from the senses. The second knowledge we got from the revelation. The third knowledge we get from the authority which is available in the classroom. The teacher has said it is right. The authority has said it is right. And the fourth knowledge is reason. We get it from our nature. We get it from the argument. We get it from logic. We get it from thoughts. We also call it rationalism. And the fifth source of knowledge is intuition. Which we get directly immediately. Meaning, we get it immediately. Direct impression of knowledge that is not derived from conscious reasoning or immediate sense perception. In the literature dealing with intuition one often finds such expressions as immediate feeling of certainty. Suddenly you get the answer and that is intuition. So, how did we get the knowledge? We got it from the senses. We got it from the revelation. We got it from the authority. We got it from the reason. And we got it from the intuition. These are the five sources of knowledge in epistemology. And epistemology and education. Epistemology and education are tacit companions and both are primarily the act of knowing. Even in the education we need to know and we need to know the epistemology as well. So, epistemology is the motor of education in a sense because it drives the educational process. You can say that epistemology is the knowledge. It is the motor. It is driving the education. In that direction where she is going, where she is going, where she is going, where she is going, which direction she is going is the motor of epistemology. Okay. And exeology. Exeology means it is made from exeos and logos. Wherever it comes it means study. Exeos means value. So, this is study of value. Then, exeology is called two main aspects of ethics and aesthetics. Ethics is the model of moral values and conduct. That is, it is not a story of ethics, forms, and attitudes. Like, how should I behave? What should I behave? How should I behave? How should I behave? What should I behave? What should I behave? Let's see what does ethics. Ethics is the development of the context of ethical values and conduct. Ethics is the realm of value that searches for the principles governing the Exiology and education, what does it tell us? Projecting a system of values, proposes educational aims under the form of Exiological Objectives and Ideals. The educational aims that you have made are better than the point of view. Exiology comprises both general, human and universal and specific values. We also study the definition of education. The educational aims are to transmit values from one point to another. Exiology is connected to education in this form. Performance of values requires knowledge and experience. It is said that when we show the principle, when we perform the principle, there are two things. One is our knowledge and experience. Exiology is to be given with this. And what is Exiology? Horizon of the manifestation of human creativity. We are creative, so it is necessary for us to have the knowledge of the principle. Exiology is the cultivation of creative power of the individual. Exiology is to be taken from creativity. Exiology is connected to education in this form. The matter was a bit too much. If I had separated the branches, it would have been too small. So I combined the meaning, definition and characteristics of it so that you can understand it in totality. I think now you people are clear about the concept of philosophy. What is this? It is a rational inquiry. It is about problems related to the existence of reality, human, knowledge, justice, validity, mind, language, etc. Then there are three main aspects of it. Metaphysics, epistemology and exiology. Metaphysics means, in Tattva Mimansa, it is said that the questions related to Tattva can be of four categories. Cosmological, in which the questions related to Brahmaan are asked. Theological is related to Ishwara. Anthropological is related to Manusya. And lastly, ontological is related to Vasthu. Then it is said that Tattva is related to Tiyasthita. And then it is said that what is epistemology? It is theory of knowledge and theory. It is said for sources of knowledge that there are many sources of knowledge. Like sensory organs, senses, revelation, authority, reason or intuition. Similarly, what is exiology? It is study of value. It is theory of value. It tells us what is the principle. It tells us that it is divided into two parts. Ethics and aesthetics. Metaphysics tells us how should I behave, what should do and what should not do. What should you do and what should not be done. It talks about your conduct. And who will you call beautiful? What are the parameters of beauty? You have to use all that aesthetics. So, this way branches of philosophy will be completed. And whatever philosophy you will study, keep in mind that the epistemology of this philosophy, metaphysics and exiology will be clear for you. And you will not have to remember it. So, in this way I have completed the basic conceptions about philosophy and branches of philosophy. So, thank you and don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel Explore Education. I have done from my side.


The minimum information about geospatial information system, MIARGIS, standard was developed to provide a framework for publicly sharing geospatial information system, GIS, datasets. It follows the fair principles and provides a directory structure and a JSON metadata format to capture important metadata about GIS layers and maps. Additionally, it allows users to extract metadata from Esri JSON and Geodson formats, as well as customized JSON files. This standard can be used to create a repository for GIS datasets, which would benefit the wider GIS community. This article was authored by P. Travis Thompson, Swayta Oja, Christian D. Powell, and others.


Howdy how's it going? My name's Davy Chappy and after just recently ending two of my long-running campaigns in spectacular fashion, with many more about to close and even more on hiatus until I can get the time stone, I'm sorry guys one day soon I swear, I thought that now would be a good time to talk about the concept of one of the biggest parts of every journey, the end. So as always keep in mind that a lot of this is just my opinion and if you want to finish the fight with whatever it takes on your own, feel free to play your endgame however you want, but without a way, let's begin. So there is nothing like an ending.  What do we do now? And that question of what do we do is a terrifying prospect that either makes or breaks an otherwise great story. You may not watch Game of Thrones, but you've undoubtedly heard about what a trainwreck the final season was. The Last Airbender, no not that one, was known for having a fantastic ending and Avengers Endgame, while not telling a particularly compelling story on its own, served to end one of the longest running and multi-charactered games of mutants and masterminds that this world has ever seen. The ending shapes how people look back on the story as a whole, and I really do see the MCU as a big game of D&D superhero edition. It is a perfect example of how to end a high-action combat-oriented ass-kicking campaign. Having all the heroes fighting the big bad recurring villain in an ultimate clash of wills is paramount to a good final fight, and it's even better the higher the stakes are. In your games you could have someone be kidnapped, maybe there's a bomb or the ship that they're on is on a direct course for the iceberg or something like that, and once the fight starts you don't let it end until they are done. This is the final fight and all stops need to be pulled. If the party starts to kill the villain too quickly, either have him spring a crippling trap on them, or if the bad guy is beaten especially quickly, pull a, this isn't even my final form, and have the villain upgrade himself for the quote unquote real battle. Sure, that might be a little cheesy, but players don't know what the DM does behind the screen, and if you've seriously misjudged the power level of your party versus the villain to the point where the fight is basically over in five minutes, then you probably should bite the cheese bullet and fix it to ensure a satisfying conclusion. Now, if your campaign is focused on political intrigue and espionage, and even if it's not, then perhaps a more subtle hand is required to give the players what they want. Sure, you can still have that final boss fight, but the circumstances leading up to it, and the repercussions around it are going to need to change. In a normal heroic story of justice and valor, the party reaches the bad guy, fights him, and the day is either saved, or the world is eaten by Cthulhu. In a roleplay heavy game, however, that just won't work on its own. If the game in so far has been about working the people around you to get things done that you need done, then half of the battle should just be getting to the battle. Not by fighting monsters up an extended stairwell until you reach the evil king's throne room, but by orchestrating events to actually manage to get the king in the room in the first place. The actual fighting should be an afterthought, and if your villain is especially insightful and has been a major evil mastermind throughout the course of the campaign, then please, please don't have the bad guy be so arrogant as to not think about the possibility of failure, or better yet, they should expect it. Have them plan ahead so that the characters have to worry about whether or not they should kill the boss, not because of the moral quandary of killing, but because killing the boss could potentially make things worse, or maybe the boss expected to be killed and it doesn't matter. If you've seen Watchmen, you know what I'm talking about. Those are the kind of final fights that stick with you for the rest of your days and convince you to talk about it to anyone with an ear ad nauseam, or perhaps the final part of the story might not include a bad guy at all. Maybe, at the end, the last bit of the story involves finding a way to fix the world of whatever ails it, or escaping from an evil cave, or unlocking the puzzle of an ancient artifact that could save the universe. In these hero versus world events, the ending relies not on how hard you can hit stuff in the face, but on how smart you can be at solving a puzzle that may not have a conventional answer or help even a conventional base. A game where the end happens based on your choice, and your choice is either the right one or the wrong one or somewhere in between. I remember the last session of a year-long campaign where the final fight with the embodiment of all evil was just a room, with a little girl wrapped in chains in the middle.    We couldn't leave without making the choice, and there was no alternate route. I don't think I'll ever forget charging into the room as a level 20 paladin with a shining pegasus, only to be faced with that. That is a hard memory to lose. But no matter how you end your game, you just can't skimp out on the where are they now portion. I know it's gimmicky, it's overdone in stories, but for a D&D campaign I really think that it's important to give each player a chance to bring their individual stories to a close on their terms. So when a campaign ends I go around the table and I let each person say what happens next with their character, where they go, what their future endeavors are, how the world will be changed by this now veteran adventurer leaving their mark on the world of the campaign. It's such an insignificant thing from a planning point of view.  So yeah, I hope that this video helped somebody. I know that writing an ending can be hard, believe me I spent five years of running campaigns before I even understood the concept of an ending, and I've barely even made it to that many endings myself, but over time you'll work it out, and if you've been on the ball as a DM up until that point, you'll know what to say to close the book on this story. But then I'll about do it! I hope you enjoyed this video, leave a like, comment, sub, support me on Patreon, join my Guild Wars 2 Guild, and remember to always kill your DM, for he is the real final boss. But yeah, Davie out.


Ukrainian Army destroys 1,140 Russian soldiers, 61 cruise missiles. Ukraine terminated 1,140 Russian servicemen within the past 24 hours, taking the overall number to 136,880 since the start of the military actions about it informs, citing the general staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Russia's total combat losses also include 3,267 tanks, 6,474 armored combat vehicles, 1,997 UAVs of the operational tactical level, 2,270 artillery systems, 463 multiple launch rocket systems, 234 air defense systems, 295 warplanes, 18 ships or boats. 286 helicopters, 857 cruise missiles, 5,134 units of automotive equipment and tankers, 214 units of special equipment. Ukrainian defenders destroyed 61 Russian cruise missiles last day. The general staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces reported on February 11 that Russia had lost 136,880 troops in Ukraine since the beginning of its full-scale invasion on February 24 with 1,114 lost over the previous day alone. Russia had also lost 3,267 tanks, 6,474 armored fighting vehicles, 5,134 vehicles and fuel tanks, 2,270 artillery systems, 463 multiple launch rocket systems, 234 air defense systems, 295 airplanes, 286 helicopters and 1,997 drones and 18 boats.


To so many, the year 2023 is still far, but to political groups, the time to educate the electorate on their choice of leadership is now. This was the position of the Southwest Agenda for Ashwaju-Bolatino-Bud 2023 presidential campaign swagger in an interview with Government House Correspondents in Lagos. Plus, TV Africa's love for Ikuku or Yadokun tells us more. Powell must shift from the North to the South. That was a message from these men and women, the Southwest Agenda for Ashwaju-Tinubu Swagger 2023. The group kick-started their sensitization from the doorsteps of traditional rulers in the state to notify, appeal and converse their support. Their main objective is to ensure that come 2023, Nigeria's next president emerges from the region. They explained that the principle of rotational presidency must be sustained among the geopolitical zones. For the unity of the country, the continued co-assistence of the divided nationalities in Nigeria, we must sustain the principle of rotation. We must allow the president to rotate between the North and the South for now, and then maybe later, between the geopolitical zones. The Northern Elders Forum people are saying that the president can come from anywhere that probably our Southern governors are joking, but they are the highest jokers of the century because we know that that is the policy, that is the norm, that is the tradition. Once the Northern people use it for eight years, it must come to the South. They strongly believe that Nigeria is in dire need of the right leadership and sensitization such as this is just handy. If there's anything that we need most now is the right leadership. We need a leader that has a vision. When you are going somewhere and you have no idea of what you are going to do there, what do you expect? We are also looking at a win-win situation at the other side of the coin, and that is producing a leader from among the current followers. Senator Dayo Adeye lays the Swagger 2023 campaign team. For him, only one man stands out and should be supported. People are already rooting for him in all the news and the cranny of Nigeria, and we believe that person is actually one of them. Every part of Nigeria, at time goes on, we have the opportunity to present the president. For now, you make use, you put your best foot forward. The sensitization train of the Southwest Agenda for Ashiwaju Swagger 2023 is built to roll into Lagos on Thursday in continuation of consultation and mobilization tour of the region. From Lagos, Love Ikuku Oyedoku reporting from Plus TV, Africa. And don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.