Greetings from the National Archives in Washington, D.C. I'm Deborah Stydell-Wall, Deputy Archivist of the United States. I'm pleased to welcome you to today's discussion, Working for Suffrage, How Class and Race Shaped the U.S. Suffrage Movement. This program is just one of the many ways the National Archives is celebrating Women's History Month this March. At the National Archives, we hold many of the records that help tell the stories of women who fought for the right to vote, including petitions, legislation and court cases. Our records also contain the stories of lesser-known women, including working women and women of color whose activism played a role in the suffrage movement. Many of those stories are highlighted in our centennial exhibit on women's suffrage, rightfully hers, American women and the vote. The exhibit will close on April 10th, but the important conversation about women's fundamental civil rights will continue. One of the notable quotes from rightfully hers dates to the 1915 garment workers' strike, when Leonora O'Reilly stated, equal pay for equal work. Ms. O'Reilly championed much-needed reforms, and equal pay was just one of them. Our panel today will discuss how women like Leonora and many other working-class women seeking reforms for themselves and their families were involved in the suffrage movement. I'm pleased to introduce today's panel, moderator Paige Harrington, author of Interpreting the Legacy of Women's Suffrage at Museums and Historic Sites, whose book outlines a modern strategy for telling the fuller story of the fight for the right to vote. Panelists Kathleen D. Cahill, author of Recasting the Vote, How Women of Color Transform the Suffrage Movement, which examines a number of heroines often ignored in the suffrage movement. And Allison M. Parker, author of Unceasing Militant, The Life of Mary Church Terrell, which tells the story of one of the most prominent activists of her time. Thank you all for joining us today. Hello, everyone, and thank you so much for joining the program today. Our program, Working for Suffrage, How Class and Race Shaped the United States Suffrage Movement. I'm Paige Harrington, and on behalf of my colleagues, Dr. Kathleen Cahill and Dr. Allison Parker, I would like to thank the National Archives, the Deputy Archivist of the United States, Deborah Wall, and the National Archives Foundation for convening this program today. Let me introduce my colleagues, Dr. Kathleen Cahill. Hello. She is an Associate Professor of History at Penn State University, where she focuses on women's working and political lives and asking how identities such as race, nationality, class, and age have shaped them. Her recent book, Recasting the Vote, How Women of Color Transform the Suffrage Movement, is published by University of North Carolina Press in 2020. Also, Dr. Allison Parker, History Department Chair and Richards Professor of American History at the University of Delaware. Her recent book, Unceasing Militant, The Life of Mary Church Terrell, is published by University of North Carolina Press also in 2020. Thank you both and welcome. We're excited to start this conversation with you today. Dr. Cahill, can you tell us a little bit more about your book? Sure. I'd be happy to, and thank you. I'm really honored to be here at the National Archives. It has played a large role in my research for both my books. I also was just able to get to Washington to see the exhibit last week during spring break. And if you are able to get there, it's really fantastic. So I highly recommend it. As Paytrenton mentioned in my recent book, Recasting the Vote, I write about six women who were active suffragists and I talk about their motivations for joining the movement, which often differed from some of the women that we're used to talking about. So what I thought I would do is quickly introduce them to you and talk about how their experience is sort of raised some questions about labor and work, as well as class and race. So slide number one, please. So as I said, it's a collective biography of six women who all faced prejudice, not just due to their gender, but also to their race, ethnicity, or citizenship status. And moving sort of clockwise, starting in the top left, the woman getting into the car, is Adelina or Nina Otero-Warren, who was from a powerful political family, Hispanic family in New Mexico. And in New Mexico, they called themselves Hispanic rather than Mexican-American. She was a leader in the New Mexican suffrage movement and insisted that the movement be bilingual so that it would address the needs of Spanish-speaking New Mexicans and politicians. She was a teacher and a superintendent of schools in Santa Fe County, and then also an inspector for federal Indian schools in New Mexico. Next to her is Marie Botnobaldwin, who is a member of the Turtle Mountain Chippewa Nation in what is now North Dakota. And she also worked for the Federal Indian Service, the employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the BIA. But she worked in Washington, D.C., and she lived there for a number of years. She's also one of the very first Native women to earn a law degree, and here she is showing her collection of Native women's artwork. On the far right is Mabel Lee, who is a Chinese woman living in New York City, but she couldn't become a citizen of the United States due to the Chinese Exclusion Act. Nonetheless, she's a suffrage advocate, and she becomes the first Chinese woman to earn her PhD at Columbia University and potentially in the entire country, and it was in economics. Below her is Laura Cornelius-Kallogg, a member of the Wisconsin Oneida Nation who also worked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs as a teacher and was an author and activist. In the middle, Carrie Williams Clifford was a poet and activist, a founder of the Ohio Federation of Colored Women's Clubs and a member of the Washington, D.C. NAACP branch. And last, but certainly not least, is Gertrude Bannon, or Zit Kalasha, a member of the Yanktan Sioux Nation in what is now South Dakota. She was an incredibly busy woman. She worked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. She was an author, a musician, and an activist. So, as you can see, for all of these women, they were working in often white-collar or professional jobs and were middle or even upper-class in their communities, but due to racial prejudices of the time, their class standing doesn't always translate into the same kind of respect that white, upper-middle, or upper-middle-class women had. So, to start our conversation, I wanted to use their stories to highlight the variety of different kinds of work that women in the suffrage movement were doing. And we often think of work as the industrial labor, which absolutely played an important role in the suffrage movement, but I wanted to introduce some of these other kinds of work to think about. So, in the next slide, it's some images from the 1913 Washington, D.C. suffrage parade. Parades are a really good place to start when thinking about labor and race in the suffrage movement. This 1913 parade was the first national suffrage parade in Washington. And parade organizers often thought about women as workers, and you can see this in the image on the left and then the section from the program on the right. At the top of that program, you see there was a float about labor. There were wage earners in a section, so really highlighting women as workers. Below that, in government, it means civil servants, so women in that profession. And then in the bottom section, it's women in a whole variety of, again, white-collar professional jobs. And the suffragists also recognized homework in their parades. And so in this parade, there was a section for homemakers that Carrie Rollins suffered actually, marches in. And much of this was driven by the idea, as you see in the picture on the top, the woman on the left, her sash says, basically no taxation without representation is what she's alluding to. And this is something that suffragists had been talking about for a long time. I also want to point out that the woman in the very middle of that photograph is Ida B. Wells, an African-American suffragist from Illinois, and we'll talk about her in a minute. In the next slide, you'll see that perhaps not surprisingly, a number of female lawyers were involved in the suffrage movement. And in Washington, there's a very strong connection. The Washington College of Law, which is now American University's law school, was founded by women lawyers to train other women because they were rejected from most law schools in the country because of their sex. And many of the women who enrolled there were civil servants who were hoping to advance in their careers, but often hit glass ceilings. And so frustrated by these gender inequalities, they turned to the suffrage movement. On the right is Florence Ethridge, who's a white woman who worked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and was also vice president of the Federal Employees Union when it was founded in 1917. And on the left is Marie Botnobaldwin, who was a co-worker with Ethridge, and worked together. And you can see in this paper, she was sort of emphasizing her capacious identities. And she's also emphasizing the political power that Native women had in their own communities that really pushed back against some stereotypes that white Americans held. And we'll talk more about this. In the next slide, the flyer that's on the right-hand side is very similar to the flyer that is in the exhibit. And the flyer on the left is indicative of the work that Spanish-speaking women like Nino Otero-Warren were doing in the Southwest. This one was translated by Maria Lopez, who was a teacher in Los Angeles during the California suffrage movement. And again, teachers are talking about wages, about paying taxes, and about the kind of work that they were doing. And there are many, many teachers involved in the movement. And then in my last slide, I want to emphasize the work of writing and speaking. Many suffragists were writers. They were also journalists. And speaking was a career for women that a number of suffragists take up. Not all of them in the next slide do that for a living, but some of them do. And I think there are two really important points that I want us to take away from this. One is, again, that writing and speaking is labor and sometimes paid labor for these women, but also that it's because of these writings that we have been able to recover the histories of some of these women who had been left out of the story. So they left us sort of the resources with which to recover their histories. So I'll pause there with that quick overview and then we can dig into some of this as we move into our conversation. Thank you. Wonderful. Dr. Parker, tell us a little bit more about your work. Okay, thanks. And then we'll be interested in hearing about yours as well. So hello, I'm honored to have been invited to participate in this discussion of class and race in the U.S. suffrage movement. And to set the stage for our broader conversation, I'd like to first give you a quick overview of my book Unceasing Militant, which is a biography of a prominent black suffragist and civil rights activist, Mary Church Terrell. And Unceasing Militant gets its title from Paul Robeson, who was the black activist, singer and actor, whose 1954 eulogy of Terrell commemorated what he termed her unceasing militant struggle for the full citizenship of her people. Some writers have argued that Terrell was an elite black club woman who could not relate to the majority of poor and working class black women and also that she was less confrontational or radical earlier in her career and only moved to direct action when she was in her 80s because she felt she had less to lose and was frustrated by the lack of progress in her civil rights goals in the post-World War II era. I argue that Terrell was not newly radicalized in her old age and instead from early on she made cross-class coalitions and bravely challenged things like lynching and segregation while engaging in direct action protest tactics including, of course, for voting rights and that's in terms of marching in parades and also in picketing the White House. Now let me give you just some highlights of who Mary Church Terrell was. She was born enslaved in 1863 in Memphis, Tennessee during the Civil War and lived until 1954, the same year that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education. During her life she accomplished many firsts. Terrell was, among other things, one of the first black women in U.S. history to earn a bachelor's degree in 1884 from a predominantly white college, Oberlin, and then a master's degree soon after. She taught in the preeminent black public high school in Washington, D.C. and became the first black woman to be appointed to the District of Columbia's Board of Education. Terrell also became the first president of the New National Association of Colored Women or NACW in 1896. And on the far left with the feathers and the hat fruit on the hat, that's Mary Church Terrell. Sitting on the floor below the baby is Ida B. Wells Barnett and that's her baby and she's being held, so it's Charles Barnett and she's being held by Alice Dunbar Nelson. So it's quite a remarkable group of black activist women in their first year of 1896. Black women organized into the NACW in part to create a national platform from which to defend themselves against slander by hostile whites. Mary Church Terrell engaged in cross-class efforts to achieve equality by, among other things, challenging racist and sexist stereotypes about black women as sexually impure.  Mary Church Terrell was a feminist and a voting rights advocate and she was one of only two black women along with Ida B. Wells Barnett to be a founding member of the National Association of Colored People or the NAACP in 1909. During World War I, she picketed the White House for women's suffrage with the National Women's Party along with her teenage daughter and she also created the Wage Earners Association during World War I to encourage unionization amongst African-American women workers. In the 1920s, she was one of the founding members of the International Council of Women of the Darker Races and in the 1930s, she joined with the Communist Party's International Labor Defense on behalf of poor African-Americans treated unfairly by the criminal justice system such as the Scottsboro Nine. In the 1940s, she helped Athea Brandolf organize the March on Washington movement and supported striking black cafeteria workers who were resisting signing anti-communist pledges. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Terrell spoke before congressional committees in favor of an equal rights amendment and she also chaired a committee affiliated with the Communist Party that organized direct action protests and picketing and she's in the white hat in the middle in her very late 80s and a series of legal challenges. And these legal challenges went to the U.S. Supreme Court and in 1953, they managed to successfully dismantle segregation in the nation's capital a year before Brown v. Board but because it was the District of Columbia, it didn't apply nationally. Over the course of her long life, Mary Church Terrell's range of women's rights activism and cross-class alliances was extraordinary and I hope that we can use it as a way into thinking about black women's participation in the suffrage and women's rights struggle. Thank you. Wonderful. Thank you so much, Dr. Parker. So before we get to our conversation, let me tell you just a little bit about my work. So I differ from Dr. Cahill and Dr. Parker. I'm not a professor. I'm a public historian or a history practitioner and my work often spans from curating exhibits to producing public programs and then often to a myriad of day-to-day tasks that come with running a women's history site. My first book, The Legacy of Women's Suffrage, comes from that very first-hand experience as the director of the Seoul Belmont House and Museum, which is here in Washington, D.C. Some of you might know that that museum was the fifth and final headquarters for the National Women's Party, an organization founded by Alice Paul. And I think we have a slide of that museum if I'm not mistaken. The NWP is widely known as the group that introduced the controversial tactics, such as picketing the White House into the final years of the suffrage campaigns prior to the ratification of the 19th Amendment. On April 12th, 2016, President Obama designated the Seoul Belmont House and Museum as the Belmont-Paul Women's Equality National Monument, now operated by the National Park Service. It is currently the only national monument named after two women, Alva Belmont and Alice Paul. I think we might need to go back to the previous photo. It's of the exterior of the museum. In any case, as the director of that museum, one of my very first goals was to delve deeper into the history and curate the exhibits that highlighted not just the middle to upper-class white women, such as Alice Stokes-Paul and Alva Vanderbilt Belmont, but to also include the stories of the many working-class women, immigrants, and women of color across the country who worked equally hard for enfranchisement. For many reasons, this proved to be easier said than done. The book also contains a series of informative case studies written by four women's history practitioners as they outlined their ongoing efforts to address the bias and racism in their museum content. Now, to do this, the authors delved deeper into the history of Francis Willard, the National Woman's Party, the Greater Federation of Women's Clubs, and also more broadly to examine how black suffragists in Tennessee form networks within their churches to support their work for enfranchisement. In 2020, we acknowledged the centennial of the 19th Amendment, and one significant outcome was the uptick in new material and scholarship about the suffrage movement that highlights the many women of color across the country. The work of noted scholars here today, Kathleen Cahill, Allison Parker, also Martha Jones and Marjorie Sprule, among so many others, challenged the lingering assumption that it was primarily the white women who worked for enfranchisement. History practitioners such as myself rely on this type of current scholarship to inform our work, which can include exhibits, adult programs, and K-12 educational materials. There are two projects that I want to highlight today, and I'll note that both are free to the public and available online. I think the links have been put into the chat. Can we go to the next slide with the toolkit? Thank you. The first is a suffrage history toolkit produced by Girl Scouts of the USA. It is geared toward elementary and middle school students in which the materials and activities in the toolkit are set to prompt girls to discover the history of women's voting rights and civic engagement, engage in multi-generational conversations within their communities, and better understand the gender barriers that have been broken and celebrate the women who broke them. Can you go to the next slide? I'm happy to share that in the toolkit, we were able to... There you go. In the toolkit, we were able to share some of the content from Dr. Cahill and Dr. Parker's exhibit, pardon me, books. I was very excited about that. Next slide, please. And you'll see some of these images there because they've been used in their books as well. Next slide. So the next piece I want to share with you is called a Historic Decisions Issue Guide, and it is based on the research done by the National Woman's Party in collaboration with the Charles F. Kettering Foundation and written by Lila Brammer. Now, these issue guides are geared toward adults and they help to foster the development of deliberative democratic skills through examining the difficult choices Americans faced in the past and linking them to contemporary issues. In this instance, they examine the tensions between the suffragists and the White House on the eve of World War I and how the issues of race and bias increased that tension. Next slide, please. As I mentioned, the content from both the toolkit and the Kettering Foundation issue guide are both reflective of and influenced by the research and scholarship of Dr. Cahill and Parker, among others. I hope that you had an opportunity to explore, either in person or online, the National Archives exhibit, rightfully hers. It's curated by Corrine Porter, and the exhibit takes a very thoughtful look and a more inclusive look back at suffrage through a present-day lens. And today we recognize that that overarching path to women's enfranchisement was both circuitous and contentious. And I'm excited to start our conversation today with Dr. Parker and Dr. Cahill so we can really dig into the subject. Let me start with an opening question that both of you touched on just very lightly. One lingering misconception is that the 1913 suffrage procession that took place on March 3, 1913 on the eve of President Woodrow Wilson's inauguration, one misconception is that it was racially segregated with one or two exceptions. And I think we've gotten past that, but I know both of you have done extensive research on this, and I'm hoping that we can take a moment to really clear up that misconception and tell me a little bit more about your research and what you discovered. Okay, I think I'll take a first crack at that because one of the things that really struck me and still strikes me is that there's a particular narrative that even though I think we've established it amongst historians that the parade was integrated and that women of color participated, I still don't know that it's hit popular culture and you still see certain ideas and I'll give you the one that is true but is limiting and it was a slide, in one of the slides that Kathleen Kale had, she actually showed the picture of Ida B. Wells inserting herself into the Illinois delegation and marching in this predominantly white group of suffragists. The story has been that she was the only black woman to do so and the implication had been that the other black women had marched at the back. Some black women's historians had figured out quite a few decades ago that this was not in fact the case and a few of them wrote about it but it hadn't really entered into the historical conversation or popular culture ideas and then wasn't even picked up by other historians to be honest and so one of the things that when I started working on my biography of Mary Church Terrell the more I did with it, the more it seemed implausible that she would have agreed to march at the back and in all of her writings about it she does not talk about marching at the back but it was bothering me as a historian that I couldn't really pin down where's the proof of what happened and so I finally just decided to stop my other research and really look into that specific question and that's when I found the evidence that all kinds of black women participated and there was in fact a debate and a struggle over it no question about that but it just was not only Ida B. Wells Barnett so for example Mary Church Terrell and the women in the National Association of Colored Women those who were together as a group of NACW activists they were invited by Mary Beard who was a progressive era historian and some other white women to march with the New York City delegation and so they marched with the New York City delegation then there were other women like Kathleen mentioned the fact that Cliffords actually marched with the homemakers and then I found lots of newspaper articles from the time that actually detailed examples of where black women were and they were in fact in all these different professional categories they were marching as housewives, as teachers, as seamstresses whatever they were they were marching in various places but then also the Delta Sigma Theta sorority which was a brand new sorority associated with Howard had to negotiate with Alice Paul to march with the other groups of college delegations so they did want to march separately in the sense that they wanted to be Howard University Delta Sigma Theta chapter next to the Cornell University women so they got that in part because within a debate with Alice Paul Mary Church Terrell brought in her friend Ines Mulholland to help the argument and Ines Mulholland is the woman who is known in the iconic photo of her with a white outfit on the white horse who leads the parade and she's a lawyer and a suffragist so what I think we need to understand from this story is okay how did it get to be that even though Alice Paul was trying to pacify white women from the south and actively tried to get black women to go to the back why is it that she didn't succeed and this has to do with the fact that black women protested they sent in petitions to the National Association I'm sorry the National American Women's Suffrage Association and so they sent in petitions they sent in protests and they demanded and insisted on a place but what was happening is that there were actually all these kind of contests on the ground on the day of and that's where the whole issue gets confusing is that there's not one clear moment when black women are told you may march with us and instead it's this multiple series of constant contestations and assertions and I know that Kathleen has other points to raise about this as well. Yeah thanks Allison. What's so interesting is exactly the parade to me is this moment where we see very clearly kind of the racial hierarchies in US history because while black women had to really push and insist on their inclusion which they think is very important right that they are fighting for these rights they want to be part of this historic moment and they have to fight for that Native women and Chinese American women are actually asked by the organizers to participate so they have a very different experience. Now two things are important. One the numbers are much smaller so the numbers are much smaller and sort of the ideas about those groups of women are really different. As Allison mentioned right white southerners are adamant against black women participating and white southern politicians organizers feel like they need to appease them to try to win their vote it doesn't work but there's a different idea about Native women which is a much more kind of stereotypical romantic idea that they in the past had these matriarchal societies and in the past there was this sort of historic precedent for women's political power but the important thing is white Americans really thought they were disappearing or stuck in the past. So they know Marie but know Baldwin because she is attending the Washington College of Law she's training to be a lawyer she works for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and so many of the separate organizers are with her in the Washington College of Law and so they ask her will you create a float that represents kind of this past image of Native women's political power. Now Marie but know Baldwin has her own agenda which many Native women and men who are members of a group called the Society of American Indians which is kind of similar to the NAACP they were pushing back against this idea that Native people were disappearing didn't have a future in a modern America and we're asserting that in fact they did so she says look I'd love to be in the parade but I'm not going to do a float that represents this sort of past and she insists marching with the other women the group of lawyers and law students who march in their law school regalia right so she's wearing that her graduation robes essentially in the parade so she's actually not very visible because she doesn't look like what most white Americans think of when they think of an Indian or a Native person at the time so her visibility is much lower the Chinese woman there's one Chinese woman who does participate in the parade and again she's asked but she's asked to participate as a representative of China not of a Chinese American woman so parade organizers again are kind of thinking about Chinese women not as US citizens but as part of the wider worldwide suffrage movement and again this is related to the Chinese Exclusion Act which was passed in 1882 and essentially said that no Chinese immigrants very tiny numbers so it's essentially no Chinese immigrants are allowed into the United States and the very small number that aren't able to come in cannot become US citizens so the Chinese woman's on a float she is representative of China and the recent Chinese Revolution which Americans think has enfranchised Chinese women it's complicated but again this representative of a global movement where there are Chinese suffragists and again kind of an example of a place women are winning rights so again thinking about women's these kind of intersections of their race their citizenship status and the way white Americans are thinking about them really matters when we have these conversations because it means that those women's experiences in the movement were really quite different in many ways it is incredibly significant and I like what you said about the racial hierarchies because I don't think we talk about that enough and let me I want to add to that I believe in your book and please correct me if I'm wrong you talked about the fact that there wasn't a lot of pushback not only were was this Chinese American woman was she invited but she was given a place on the top of a float in the front section of the parade I think and there was little to no pushback from the other women correct so this was seen as broadening democracy across the world which then meant all of the other suffragists to participate in could get behind that concept unlike the southern women the southern delegates who absolutely told Alice Paul and the other the other people that were convening the parade that they would not participate that they would boycott if African American women were not segregated to the back of the parade so that's a very distinct look and I like the way that you spell out this racial hierarchies is there anything else that we didn't touch on for that topic because if not then I do want to move on to a couple of other questions I think we've covered it so we also talk about issues of race class citizenship and labor and the different divisions within labor from the suffrage campaigns and those outcomes and how they were impacted by regional differences so maybe we can talk a little bit about that we were talking about east coast industrial workers and we haven't talked yet and I hope that we can talk about western women from western states who were perhaps working in a more rural or agricultural environment so maybe we can talk about that a little bit Sure Alison do you mind if I start? One of the things that scholars have really emphasized about the women's suffrage movement is it's a mass movement there are many many women involved and often times it is in these sort of local communities and so the history of women's suffrage is really quite regional we've sort of talked a tiny bit about how the Jim Crow south had a particular kind of politics and the American west is an important part of this story as well because it's actually in the west where the first states it's in the west that women first win full suffrage in a number of states and in fact by I think it's 1914 all of the states from the Rockies west except New Mexico have fully enfranchised women now this there are limitations often like language requirements so they're in essence enfranchising mostly white or African-American women but this is very different from the east coast or the south and in those places to take an example of South Dakota which as I mentioned Gertrude Bonner is a college eyes from South Dakota and in South Dakota you see some really interesting ways in which work is being held up so white South Dakota women are making the argument that South Dakota had just a few years earlier been this sort of vast wilderness which is how they talked about it and that white women were part of the group of pioneers who came and turned it into a civilized American place and so they deserve the right to vote because they had done this work and they talk about it as work that right of homesteading kind of helping to farm this hard agricultural work of you know kind of wrestling this place into an agricultural state and at the same time you have people arguing that the native people who lived in South Dakota should be disenfranchised it should not be part of the citizenry precisely because they're not quote unquote civilized right and so right after statehood which happens in 1890 in South Dakota basically the constitution state constitution said we'll figure out women suffrage the next the first year of statehood they hold a referendum in which women suffrage is on the ballot as is suffrage for native men and so you see this tension in that place over kind of labor and who can be a citizen and both of those referendas fail but the number they fail slightly different ways and they're really held up as this one is on native men and this one is about white women even though race wasn't in the one about women suffrage but it becomes sort of this contest between the two and they both fail the one for women suffrage actually fails so white women and this is a theme you'll see a lot feel very frustrated that it seems as if white men are more willing to enfranchise men of color than they are white women so the other thing I want to quickly mention and this becomes an issue a little bit later but for migrant farm workers in particular the way in which voting often requires residential requirements means that in the American west migrant farm workers who are often Latino Latinas, native people or other kind of immigrant groups are often disenfranchised just on the basis of they don't have a permanent residence where they can register I'll stop there but yeah regional difference is very important yeah and I think I would just add to that to say that if you're looking at the northeast and the south and the midwest that you have some other factors that we haven't explicitly talked about but in the northeast and the midwest especially in bigger cities like Chicago or New York City you have this working class labor movement that really turns to suffrage as a way to try to fix some of the long term problems with safety on the job and Paige you mentioned the idea that working class women were talking about wage equality the other thing they were saying is literally a vote will get you a fire escape for your building and after things like the triangle shirt makes factory fire that was a very persuasive argument so a lot of working class women found that compelling and wanted to fight for suffrage in that context and especially in the northeast and the midwest and then if you look at black women the cases are slightly different in the sense that during the early 20th centuries the period of migration from the south but there's still the earlier period majority of black women are in the south and so they're disenfranchised twice over in the sense that they're disenfranchised as women they're disenfranchised as black people and so one of the things that they continuously say in all of their suffrage work is they are fighting for the right of black men to vote even though the 14th and 15th amendments gave them those rights because those rights had in effect been rescinded throughout the south after the end of reconstruction and so this is something that is distinctive for black women's history you see this unity amongst black women to support black men's disenfranchisement and then after women gained the right to vote in 1920 black women are still experiencing disenfranchisement all throughout the south as our black men and so they continue to say to groups like the national women's party and Alice Paul you need to take this seriously and deal with disenfranchisement and again Alice Paul in the NWP disagrees and says that's a racial issue not a gender issue and so they're unable to see the intersectionality of these things in the way that black women were unable to disaggregate them right? Exactly and I think this question in particular I think is very indicative of the difficult task in trying to interpret the United States suffrage campaigns this is complicated history and it's complicated by everything that we've just talked through class, race, regions citizenship, etc and we still are discovering as Dr. Cahill pointed out still discovering new information when we dig in and start to do the research so I think that's a fascinating piece of this there was one question that came from the audience and I'm hoping that Dr. Parker it's directed for you and then I'm hoping you can tell us a little bit more about some of the work that Mary Church Terrell did later in her life because suffrage in the suffrage campaign was only a short portion of that which is she had an amazingly long and productive life so I would like to spend a little bit of time talking through that so the question is wasn't Mary Church Terrell a leader in the fight to present the shutdown to prevent the shutdown of Storer College that's interesting I don't actually know that it's possible because I really couldn't cover every single thing she did but I didn't write about that and what she did do is she really trumpeted education for black men and women she wasn't educated herself and she taught Greek and Latin in the DC public schools so she was in the Du Bois camp of thinking that black people needed to be able to be fully educated to the same extent as white people and to be able to have access to professional jobs in a way that you know Booker T. Washington's vocational track for southern especially blacks was a different thing and she respected what he did there but she was a classically trained liberal arts person and so she was always fighting hard to keep historically black colleges open she was really interested in promoting black people going to predominantly white colleges too because she had gone to Oberlin which was of course among the very first in the country to open its doors to blacks and women in the 1830s as part of the abolitionist and women's rights campaign of sorts and so she was a very strong advocate of any kind of way to get especially black women access to education at a time when it was restricted so in fact in the end of her life in the late 40s well not the end closer to the end of her life in the late 40s she actually helped sue the American Association of University women to let blacks join black women who had college education join as members of the AUW and this campaign was successful in the end but it was something that she had in the I think the 1910s had actually started in her house a group of for black college educated women because the AUW was discriminating against them so she both created spaces that were safe and welcoming for black women and then also tried to get in to the ones where she was not able to get in that's incredible I just wanted to add what's significant about the women all of them were talking about is that as sort of leaders in their communities as highly educated women who were certainly experiencing racial prejudice and gender prejudice but often had this class privilege in their communities were very aware that a lot of the women in their communities did not are often very much advocating for those women and so you see a lot of the black club women like Terri Rowan Sliford, Mary Church Terrell talking about the difficulties that working class black women have and trying to do things like set up kindergarten or set up kind of reading rooms for them and so seeing themselves as leaders and there's a little bit of kind of paternalism in there but also very aware of what most women in their communities are working against and the native suffragists that I write about are also constantly advocating and trying to educate their white audiences about the real poverty and difficulties that native people face often because of really restrictive government policies where they were losing land and therefore their livelihoods and so again many of these women see themselves as advocates for a much broader group and kind of coalitions across class Thank you for pointing that out. Let me also say that I think something that loops all of this together and from as a history practitioner so somebody who works in museums who interprets this history for the public one of the things that I argue for in my book is that we need to take when we talk about suffrage we need to not start with 1848 which is of course Susan B. Anthony or excuse me Elizabeth Cady Stanton's Seneca Falls and then stop at 1920. These are not tidy little bookends that just said now all women have the right to vote. It simply didn't work that way because we know that there were way too many challenges after that. The 19th amendment simply removes the gender restriction from voting. It doesn't grant and guarantee women the right to vote and so I know that there's also misconception around that but I also want to add that when I've talked about this or frequently when I talk about this I try to make sure that people understand that 1920 which is the ratification of the 19th amendment was simply one piece of that fight. There were decades and decades of work that had to be done by women in all communities including Mary Church Terrell and the rest of the work that she did in her life to extend through citizenship and voting rights because you know that voting rights can be given and they can be taken away and it does very much like Dr. Cahill you pointed out if you don't have a permanent residence you may not be able to register to vote and there's nothing illegal about that because that's what the statute that's what the local statute said. I also encountered a lot of information which was fascinating about the years before the Civil Rights Act and then the Voting Rights Act and how the National Women's Party chose to support or chose not to support some of the additional work that was going on and we all know or perhaps we don't know that in 1923 the original Equal Rights Amendment was introduced to Congress and that's what the National Women's Party and Alice Paul focused on for the rest of the through the late 1970s even into the 1980s so it's definitely an extended timeline and I'm excited that we were able to work that in and talk a little bit about what happened after 1920. I know that you're both working we're coming up we've got a few more minutes but I want to give you both time to talk about the new projects that you're working on because I know both of you have something in the works but I also want to add is it possible that you can talk a little bit about your process for research this is a program that is convened by the National Archives and I'm sure that you both have like myself researched there many many times now exhaustive amount of research goes into this as you were working on both of these books did you find anything that really surprised you or perhaps cleared up any misconceptions or something that was even surprising so maybe you can talk just a little bit about that and then we'll close it out Dr. Cahill correct so yeah the National Archives are such a national treasure and for me part of this was written while I was moving so I was actually using digitized newspapers a lot but for the National Archives piece two of the really key sources for me one was the personnel files of the native women that I write about as I mentioned they all worked for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the federal government kept personnel files keeps still keeps files on all of its employees and these were really treasure troves the government still figuring out how to be a bureaucracy in the early 20th century and so there's lots of information in there that letters from their employees it's really before they start using a lot of forms and so there's a lot more information in there than maybe you would see later in the exhibit itself there's a photograph of Marie Botnobaldwin and it is her personnel that's the photo she submitted to the personnel file when they under Woodrow Wilson begin to require photos so that it was an effort to keep black applicants from getting jobs so you could visually see what race people were and the picture that she submits is kind of it was certainly a surprise when I found it it took me a while to figure it out because it's a photograph of her very much in she's wearing these beautiful dentalia earrings she has kind of a beaded shawl around her shoulders her hairs and braids so she's looking very much like that stereotypical image that she actually pushed against in the parade but in her personnel file that's the picture she submitted and she had many other pictures of herself in kind of high Victorian fashion that she could have used and my theory is that she's making a very strong statement about the value of indigenous cultures which as I mentioned federal policy at the time was assimilation or trying to really stamp those out religious practices were outlawed children were being sent boarding schools to kind of get them away from their cultural traditions and so for her to submit that photograph I think she's making a statement about the value of those cultures in the same way that her collecting of Native women's art also made that statement so she's demonstrating this sort of complicated nature of her identity which all of the Native women did and they were really advocating for sort of a joint dual citizenship that they were advocating for the government to support uphold treaties and recognize their nations but also arguing that they were American citizens who deserve rights so that photograph is in the exhibit as I said and it was a really surprising moment for me Mabel Lee's immigration file is the other piece that was really powerful that again Chinese were really restricted that couldn't become citizens and if they left the US it was very hard to get back in and so she had when she went to visit China after having graduated from Columbia she had to request permission and they required sort of statements from witnesses and they had to be white witnesses that she was indeed a student and had been a student and therefore would have been eligible to come back and the other piece of evidence that she clearly gives them it's written up in the file to prove her status as a student is her like 640 page dissertation right so but she had to go through this whole process to come back into the country because of the laws so those two were really surprising and helped me really think about their experiences puts it in a different context doesn't it that's fascinating just out of curiosity how how long did it take you to do the research for this book I'm just curious oh probably about almost a decade I also had children in between the sort of first book in this book but it was great fun but I was trying to hit 2020 so academics aren't known for their punctuality but having that the 100th anniversary is only coming around once so I had to hit it that's true thank you very much thank you very much for that Dr. Parker yeah I would say also 10 years so biographies are big products as well and for mine I actually spent a lot of time at the Library of Congress and one thing that I'd love to say is that now unlike before Mary Church Terrell's collection is generally speaking digitized and mostly transcribed even so that's a super exciting development that unfortunately happened after I finished all my research but nonetheless it makes it much more searchable and there really are her life she lived for 90 years and she was an activist for almost the entire time so she did so much and I tried to write a definitive biography but it's almost impossible to put everything in so I just it was incredible to try to even not make it be a doorstop I didn't want it to have to be something that you could barely pick up but I also spent time at various other places like the Schomburg in the New York City Public Library and then also Howard University has a big collection of her work and then I helped with the family to facilitate the gift of other papers that they had been holding on to that I was reading there at their home to Oberlin College which now has changed the name of the library to the Mary Church Terrell Library and so there's also a collection of papers now at Oberlin so those are the main sources that I was able to use for the collection and it's very exciting to be able to travel and see the different collections but it's also really important to get them accessible via digitization and so that's something that I hope we can do a lot more of with all of these records because then students in far-flung parts of the United States and the world can access this history so much more easily and that's I think a very huge benefit that we are enjoying today. It is and I do hope I will add to that that when I was the director of the Soul Belmont House we wanted to reinterpret and dig deeper into these stories because the museum at that time was presenting a very limited storyline that included Alva, Alice, Lucy Burns and a few other people, Ines Malahaland and a few other people but they were largely just the white women who were leaders of the movement and not having all of the papers digitized or even a good number of papers digitized from these archives across the country really prevented us from doing that work because this is again and it's not surprising many, many museums are very small and don't have a budget for travel so not to mention there's usually a very small staff so I hope that the digitization and what we're seeing is this push for digitization will actually start to help practitioners who are curating these exhibits and hosting these public programs it will help them find more up-to-date materials and then relying on scholarship from academics like yourself will be able to jointly really get ourselves beyond some of those deconstrued misconceptions so it will be nice when that is more of a I hope more of a practice for everyone so we're running quickly out of time but can you each take just a couple of minutes and describe the next project that you're working on? Let's start with you Dr. Parker Sure, this is at the absolute very beginning stages but I'm working on a project on Mary Hamilton and she that moves me into the civil rights movement period of the 50s and 60s and she was a core the Congress of Racial Equality Organizer in Tennessee and other places but she sued and the case went to the Supreme Court where she won a ruling against a judge in Alabama where the courtroom and the lawyers refused to call her by an honorific like Ms. Hamilton and instead only called her Mary and everybody else had an honorific like Mr. Mrs. whatever it was and so the court determined that the courts always have to use honorifics for every person in the court not just white people you know things like that and so she's a really interesting person and the Michaels actually came up with the idea of the concept of Ms where you take the married aspect out of the title for women so that's what I hope to be working on. That's tremendous, that's tremendous Dr. Cahill? Yeah, oh that's really interesting so I'm sort of following up on some of the stories in New Mexico and I came across a group of about 60 American women who tried to vote in the election of 1920 in New Mexico and again most of our sort of stories about black women trying to vote are from the south but in Columbus they go to the polls in this first election where women can vote in New Mexico and they're turned away and initially I thought well of course they're turned away because they're black women but the New Mexico state constitution says you can't discriminate on the basis of color so what's or race so what's happening here what judge should act and so digging into that I discovered that they are turned away because they're married to soldiers so the Buffalo so-called Buffalo soldiers in New Mexico and the judge is ruling that that their marital status is what is that they don't have residency right so they're part of this question about mobility and residency and so wanting to tell their story and think about who they were and the unit that their husbands are in is the 24th infantry which has a very interesting history and particularly had was sort of in some racial the attacks in Houston in 1917 a few years earlier so kind of the conjunction of the kinds of politics that they hoped that they could influence and then what they run up against even as you said right 1920 is not the end of the struggle no that's fantastic well we are just about nope we are out of time so let me say thank you thank you both for being here and for this deep dive into the work that you've been doing I hope that the audience enjoyed it I know I certainly did and on behalf of both of you let me say once again thank you very much for the National Archives for the National Archives Foundation and their supporters who made this program possible today so thank you all very much for attending


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overlord here in this bit I'm gonna be discussing some recent activity that the directors for the upcoming screen project Matt been back Matt Bennelly and Tyler Gillett They've had some recent activity on Twitter that has gotten a lot of fans excited I know a lot of us yesterday We all are still very excited that we found out that Sydney Prescott Neff Campbell could be reprising her role could be in in the works of coming back to reprise her role as Sydney Prescott If everything goes as planned and once everything gets resolved with this outbreak And they actually have a shooting schedule in mind with the full-fledged cast An interesting thing that I did want to point out was that the video that the video that Was addressed yesterday where she actually had that interview and that sit down where she Addressed screen 5 and the fact that she had been contacted that video has been rendered private on the original source on YouTube And the kind of just has me and me thinking and several other the major youtubers thinking that Neff Campbell wasn't supposed to say anything or the just simple fact that She said just a little too much in that the studio Involved with screen 5 of course by glass media and the directors and everyone involved with it at Radio silence being the production company They are planning a major casting announcement coming up probably in the next coming weeks maybe short days Who knows? But the fact that a video went private just kind of struck everybody by surprise and just kind of got everyone else a little bit More excited because now we're thinking that she said too much And there's probably a lot more other juicy things to what she said that she probably should not have said But getting into the video yesterday, we all were excited about Sydney Prescott and now also after that There was a trend on Twitter regarding Selena Gomez having a participation in screen 5 now for those of you who are not familiar with The original plans for screen 5 or just some consideration that were in the works for screen 4 Screen 4. I mean not screen 5 back when screen 4 was coming out Jill Roberts she was actually that role was actually considered for Selena Gomez before Emma Roberts Took the role as Jill Selena Gomez was considered to portray Jill at the time Now I think with the in the actual issue there came in was just simple fact that when screen 4 came around This is still in the early 2010s is around 2011 and I believe Selena Gomez was still doing which is a wavley place at the time on Disney Channel and As we all know in screen 4 Jill ended up being the killer And that might have been the real reason why she didn't participate just some miscommunications there And maybe Disney did have a factor in her actually not being a thing in screen 4 Because a simple fact that if she would have been in screen 4 She would have ended up being the killer and then we also have her on Disney portraying this This kid friendly character in Alex on which is a wavley place that that probably wasn't gonna be looking too good in the media But that's probably why she didn't participate but Yesterday fans on Twitter were rallying for her to be in screen 5 and it actually started trending Selena Gomez in screen 5 or hashtag put Selena in screen 5 something of that effect you can go on Twitter and look it up You'll see that it's trending They got around to Making this a trend and I guess it's gotten the attention of the directors of screen 5 because they have both followed Selena Gomez on Twitter and What I find interesting about that is this is the same This is the same thing that they've been doing on Twitter that everyone has been going crazy about in regards to how they followed Courtney Cox They followed David Arquette David Arquette is also remaining tight-lipped about this about the subject He had a sit-down recently or something he did something yesterday or or today on entertainment tonight Where he he basically would just still be tight-lipped and not saying anything about screen 5 He's he's just saying the same thing over and over. He'd love to come back. I feel like he's been contacted, but who knows But yeah, everybody is now rallying behind Selena Gomez being in screen 5 my take on this is the fact that Selena Gomez being in screen 5, I think that would be a a nice little a Nice little nod to kind of what we could have had when screen 4 came out Just kind of going back to original Considerations and giving her a role that she was considered for and then also Selena Gomez herself I believe she is a huge horror fan. I think she actually has a short a short horror film that she did Not a short horror film like a full-length film, but a short film that was in the horror genre I Think Selena Gomez being in screen 5 would be a great addition to the cast I've already kind of made it clear who I think should be in screen 5 for the most part My cast would include Nef Campbell, Courtney Cox, David Arquette, Jessica Roth Bill Skarsgard, Patrick Dempsey Jane Levy, I think Jane Levy would actually be an amazing addition to a screen 5 And if Selena Gomez is involved in that also would be great for me In my opinion, I think Selena Gomez would be a great addition. I think she is a very talented Actress and if she's given this the right the proper role I'm not saying Selena Gomez is one of the greatest actresses alive She's nowhere near the level of Nef Campbell, of course Or any of the major final girls from a horror film But I think if you give her the proper the proper Ingredients that she could she could prove herself to be a great addition to a screen 5 Let me know what you guys think about that down in the comment section below Would you want to see Selena Gomez in screen 5? What are your thoughts and what do you think her roles should be in screen 5? How would they use her and what capacity could she be the opening kill? If if she is the opening kill, I think that would actually be There's there's a good chance that that could actually make headlines if if it's it if it is executed properly I think that could become one of the next biggest iconic openings to a horror film The same way that Drew Barrymore was For the original screen now I think really what what would honestly just throw everybody off if they did an opening kill In a shocking way was if Sydney was the opening kill, but I don't think that's going to be the case But if the opening kill is Selena Gomez, I think that would also be something that is going to be It could be iconic if done right anything can be iconic if it's done right And with the proper actress with the proper script and with the proper execution But let me know what you guys think about all this down in the comment section below about Selena Gomez Potentially being in screen 5 and the director seemingly having contact with her if you haven't already make sure you subscribe It's on a post notification So you never miss a video and also in the description I have links on my facebook group or I'll have links to all my social media accounts rather I mean I'm on facebook twitter and instagram You can message me there to let me know if there's any movies news or views You will have me to cover in the future and then down in the comment section as well I'm gonna have a link to the facebook group Go ahead and join that group if you want to stay up to date on anything horror related Any scream content and Jeepers Creepers news with all that in mind guys. I will see you in the next video


All right, cyber traders welcome on back here this top of the month November 1st shortly after 2 30 p.m That is Eastern time welcome on back of course for our afternoon meeting great to see all of our students like Norman and Bill and Scott still sticking with us here at this time of the day great to see the later as well as always I should say loud and clear from her So I believe that we are officially good to go and if you're joining us back on social media Facebook live or YouTube Welcome on back So I know that a rich tagged in for me on Friday afternoon to go to the lovely dentist All as well there thankfully didn't have to get any teeth yanked or any of that bad stuff But I was at a commission going into the end of last week. So great to be back We've had a really good morning, and I'll tell you what I got to go quick your fat I got to go quick your folks We have the phase 2 stock course coming up phase 2 lesson 2 at 305 p.m. Eastern time So it'd be kind of a lightning round edition here of our afternoon meeting But because I was out on Friday, I know that rich didn't really dive too much into crypto Bitcoin So of course we'll summarize that at the end, but right now nxtd up on the screen It's like number nine or ten on the gainers list right now up just about 22% One of our students Norman got a got a few cents on this trade just a moment ago 17 cents He got in I think from like 433 is squeezed up You know hey for right now making a lower high and had pulled back down a bit So definitely in this consolidated state that it's in but let's see if this could build up another higher low later on today Actually first maybe it breaks this support and then it makes the sling shot We'll kind of see where this goes from here, but the nxtd easily enough for right now We'll put this on the main watch list so far And we'll see what else can join it We'll go right from top to bottom will recap any of the big movers that we caught from earlier this morning Or at least going into the early afternoon But again, we got class coming up at 305 Eastern So we'll go kind of quick here the ABVC at this point not too interested for the afternoon But definitely made a nice big move after the market opened up definitely doesn't look that pretty either So I will look to go over this move once again coming up that'll be tomorrow morning inside our traders talk workshop That's our weekly Q&A for all of our members here like Kathleen and Deb and Norman later all of you guys know best But no I said that for our new students and trial members here Otherwise that are just joining us for the first time like Vishnu one of our trial members joining us Well, hey, stay tuned tomorrow tomorrow morning at 11 o'clock Eastern time I'll be doing our weekly traders talk workshop live inside the Savagr room All you got to do is be in the be in the room and you'll get access to it But at 11 o'clock tomorrow Eastern, I'll cover this move from a to z beginning from pre-market What we are anticipating for at the open and ultimately why this made the move that it made down going into this time of the day So, you know for the afternoon this ABVC not really worth watching at this point But again, we'll cover it from from the morning move tomorrow man, I Sure wish I had my shares of BTTX back from 12 bucks. Holy smokes You know, I did not expect this stock to make the parabolic move that it made I ended up getting 80 cents on this which I was pretty content for at the time But man this thing just kept going and going and going I'll tell you what class earlier today ended up costing me a lot of Money by not being in this stock, but you know, I jokingly say that to a degree although that was the truth It's to say that we're gonna find stocks like BTTX all day Every day of the week. So, you know, it's to say hey the stock's still up a hundred eight percent right now It's it's screaming on the way down here So I'm not too keen to put this on the afternoon watch list But listen if you were in class with me earlier in the morning and ended up missing this giant run up again, folks There's always gonna be plenty of other opportunities out there. What was it from yesterday or Friday? It was BKKT. I get my stocks mixed up here between this and the BTTX, right? So, you know very similar moves at least based on the parabolic move up from the morning Both are pretty much dropping off right now So yeah, BTTX will try and find another one like this come tomorrow morning. It's all good Maybe that stock could be grill right here GRIL making a really nice pot for us right now Actually, this stock ended up was this was this one in pre-market. Yeah, it was pre-market after 830 I remember Fausto pointed this out early at the time It didn't really make the the move that we wanted it to make and to be honest with you We didn't really focus on this stock up until the the mid-afternoon shortly after 1 30 But we had called it out at the time then breaking new highs I took my eyes off it actually for a little while after so really nice and refreshing to see the stock back up To the highest year and we'll see if this can keep going Was muscle maker grill and a few of these around Long Island not bad All right, we'll see what else we got the a nip stock pretty expensive the ATRL just very flat right now We we talked about this move from earlier this morning SLGG actually a stock that we are pretty familiar with live inside the trading room We haven't traded this in a little while but dating back to the end of last year beginning of this year We saw this super league gaming stock make a big pop all the e-sports stocks at the time we're taking off So I remember SLGG AESC both of these stocks together. We're making the same move, you know for the afternoon right now pretty flat Mmm, I had called this IO stock out earlier today And you know what we talked about this during the during the class here And we're talking about briefly indicators earlier this morning So actually I want to show this year the Fibonacci retracement lines from the open basically to where it had peaked at earlier I was telling you folks at least at the time You know if this ends up beginning to pull back if this ends up slipping under the thirty eight point two percent But you can see this easily continuing to drop off. I took my eyes off this stock after a little while once the class finished up So it's just to say hey it didn't truly break lower ended up actually holding support right off the thirty eight point two And you know although it had a really tough time breaking higher and it's pulled back down now You know that made a nice runoff support from earlier into the late morning So I don't know maybe keep this on your side list. Maybe check in with it tomorrow morning, perhaps All right, we got a bunch of stocks that are up percentage wise here folks I know the market ended up dropping off a tiny bit at the open and just kind of flat for the meantime right now But I'll tell you there's a bunch of stocks that are up big 10 15 20 percent at least You have the Vuzi stock Vuzi I were pretty familiar with this stock from I think it was midway through last week If I'm not mistaken back Monday then Thursday of last week on a couple of occasions We'd called out the pop You know hey right now making a nice move back up here, so I'll take it. We'll put this on the main list here Vuzi all right We'll keep it going. Don't mix up B cell and F cell. They're actually both on the gainer side today FCE L making a nice little bounce back up off of past resistance that broke out from so I'll check in on plug Pog I'd much rather trade F cell for being honest because you know I feel like for a lot of us You know you would likely trade the same number of shares between F cell and plug And really you should be trading more shares of F cell given that's simply just the cheaper stock You don't want to be trading a thousand shares of this plug stock given the you know It's moving kind of slow for a forty forty one dollar ticker I you know, I know they're moving the same pattern trend, but I'd rather focus more on the F cell stock If you got the deep pockets to trade plug on a thousand shares and be my guest, but I'm gonna trade this one first likely IFRX look at this little move up to the highs right now Prior to this last spike of volume was only trading about four or five thousand shares per minute So, you know, I like the fact that it's at the highs This was a stock from last week to dating back to Thursday last week made a pop-and-drop type of play back then and Well really since day over day, it's been moving back up pretty nicely So, you know if I feel a need to put this on our list at the end then I will Little slow. I like the fact that it's at the highs and you do have an iceberg order here acting as resistance Might sell myself into putting that on the main list at the end so if I I'd rather put on the list first this one You know not the cheapest but right within our price range still at the highs right now making a pretty strong push You have a fourteen fifteen thousand share iceberg on the ask at twenty two dollars seventy seven cents And that's not extremely close to all-time highs But really over the last month month and a half two months rather this stocks been on a nice roll So definitely looking great on the daily chart on the intraday charts near the highs I'll put the so-fi on there All right, I think that just about does it on the gainer side folks I'm sure there's plenty else that's up big as number 50 is just up eleven twelve percent So, you know, hey folks, if there's anything else that looks good That's moving up pretty steadily pretty nicely then call it out type it in the chat board Let me know not to be confused with nxtd of nxtp the stack got crushed early on in the morning and Really at this point just really flat. So, you know, that's not worth watching A ten if this was shortable, I'd definitely say this would be a much better opportunity And if it is shortable in your platform, then I would put this on your main list For right now, we'll see what else we got here in the interim. Oh No BTBT shaking down I took my eyes off this thing for all of five ten minutes and this thing is dropping off pretty steadily I'm in this trade. I scaled out half my position earlier under twelve My entry price thankfully I have a really good entry on it from like the four class started 1132 is my entry price So I'm hanging on right now for the last 500 I wanted this to push up pretty nicely by the time I turned over to this in the meeting so we could put it on our main list But if it's not breaking higher then I'd like to think there's only one other way It's gonna go and I may as well just get out here pretty soon So now I guess I'll hang on to this by the end of the meeting But I'm not gonna put this BTBT on the main specialist now at this point If it was gonna pop up off at 12 then I probably would have put it on the main list, but I Think there's better out there I'll tell you what just going down the losers list here Otherwise kind of skimming through any any other familiar names, you know You got fun here number 18 down just about 10% but you can't short it and it's really flat for the meantime So I'm gonna pass on this folks I don't really see much else out there that looks that great if there is anything that I skipped or completely blanked on missed over Then let me know here in the chat board David he's calling out the American Airlines trade AAL and you know AAL is near the highs of the day So I like that part, you know, I feel like there can be a lot of stocks like American Airlines That's not up a whole lot percentage wise, but clearly tradable, you know, very tight spread liquid order book I know Fausto was all about the Neo trade today. This is an EV company This is definitely a lot more flat compared to American right now I Don't know. I still feel like there could be a bunch of stocks that just look like this year So if I put American Airlines on I would have to put the other 20 to 25 other stocks on that are just tradable that are You know making a slow move up to the highs, but they're not up a whole lot percentage wise So, you know, hey, I'll say this on AAL as I would on any other stock that you would have tossed me there David see if you do well on American Airlines as a day trade most days of the week Then I'm sure that you'd be more inclined to follow this specific stock as you should be But otherwise, I'm gonna pass on from putting this on the main like specialist for right now Rkt. It's got a ping from on Benzinga pro. Actually, this is like a outdated news report practically from this morning They ended up trading higher with loan depot which gained following Better than expected quarter three results. I guess that's UWMC Yeah, not much there. I don't really see much there at all All right, folks, let me know if there's anything else up down left right more than 5% that you'd want me to look at in the interim I will jump over quickly to Bitcoin Ethereum Cardano go over those three briefly, but that'll just about do so Real quick on the Bitcoin front. I had left off I was on Wednesday last week because I was out from doing the meeting on Friday But where we left off at the time this pulled back This is the six hour chart the same six hour I was showing it pulled back to the hundred EMA held it pushed back up. All right, that's a great sign But what's happened since? Haven't had really much go on since and well if anything it hasn't truly broken out again So, you know much like we treat a stock if it's not gonna break higher I'd like to think over time will begin to see this pull back down Perhaps even break below the hundred EMA perhaps even get closer to the 200 EMA. Should that be the case now? I drew a horizontal line and this is basically I just rounded up, but right off of sixty two thousand five hundred Generally speaking very generally speaking could probably drag it down a little bit more But you know right around this blue line it peaked at it ended up popping and dropping and then dropped off pretty hard after So I think that this is still kind of just in consolidation Underneath that peak and I'm gonna round up again like to what I'd said sixty two five just around that vicinity We have clearly a pretty big resistance. So just truly hasn't broken out from it yet I think just we're waiting on that and we'll see what happens. All right on the Ethereum front I know that Ethereum's been getting a lot more momentum I should have actually shown the Ethereum to Bitcoin chart itself But Ethereum's gained a lot of traction lately over the last week to two weeks And right now this looks pretty strong to keep going just a nice smooth nice smooth uptrend Ended up converging the moving averages here, but then ended up diverging as it continued to run up So that's pretty healthy now on Cardano Cardano Well after that last little shake down on Bitcoin down to the 100 EMA man This thing ended up snapping a bearish pennant pattern that it was building for quite some time I haven't sold a single lick of my Cardano yet folks. So, you know, that's just something that you should know I haven't sold any of that yet. I have a ton So, you know, it's to say that I'm still very bullish on Cardano the altcoins But you know, I brought this up a few weeks ago between the Bitcoin dominance chart You know and Ethereum too I think that those will look to pump first and then we'll see the others really go and form We've had a bunch of altcoins over the weekend make some wacky move some big pops here and there But not any of that. I know that we're in as a group here, but it's coming folks. It's coming soon All right, so in the time that I was flapping my gums about Bitcoin I'll tell you I got one stock that popped up on my Benzingo radar I don't know what the chart looks like my first time looking at this ZKIN right now It's up 5% trading less than half a million shares. So that's not that great But it just broke a new high the day. So I wanted to turn over to it. It's not looking that great right now I'm not gonna put this on the main special list for right now NXT D or rockets, you know what I may as well jump off the mic right now Jeff because otherwise if you're not in this trade then You're wasting your time listening me is this thing just rockets up without you So, you know what? I'm gonna finish right now the NXT D looks great. Obviously number one already on our watch list I guess I said I'd come back to the IFRX. That was the one I said I'd come back to at the end if I needed to I don't know if it ends up popping wouldn't shock me, but for right now looks really flat So I'm gonna pass on it for right now and we'll stick with what we have so far All right, so folks all in all we got about five stocks to work with going into this afternoon I know that most of us will be in class with me the phase two stock course We'll be covering a stocks range and the increments that it could trade within so it's a very important class Perhaps a prelude for my preparing to trade the market open class that that we typically do in the phase two curriculum So hey, I look forward to it I look forward to seeing most of our students there if you're not joining class Or if you're just a trial member testing our room out for the week then stay tuned I know that Rich will be back on the mic He'll get his screen sharing pretty shortly from right now and best of luck trading going into the market close then folks. Take care


Welcome on behalf of the iSchool student services team. I'm Sheila Gurtu, iSchool's student outreach specialist and I support the iSchool associate director who coordinates graduate advising and I help develop and offer student success resources for the San Jose State University School of Information. I also coordinate our certificate programs and the iSchool open classes program. A big part of my day involves answering questions from both prospective students and current students. Students and prospective students can reach out to our student services team through a variety of service points such as our daily live chat service on our website via our help desk online through email or via our help forum on the iSchool advising and administration portal in Canvas. Our student services team takes care of all student records inquiries communications and reminders throughout the student services life cycle from admission through graduation. Our mission is to provide both electronic and personalized support through custom curated e-advising tools, referrals to faculty experts and guidance on a range of issues from procedural to course planning. We're here to facilitate and support student growth as students meet these milestones toward their career goals. Our services foster belonging and engagement such as our new student checklist and graduation planning checklist, new student registration tips webinar, lunch and learn, MLIS pathway workshops with faculty advisors, our YouTube recordings, online tutorials and our e-advising toolkit which feature helpful tools such as course rotations, a unit planning tool, a downloadable MLIS planning workbook and searchable FAQs among others. Students can sign up for individual personalized advising sessions offered over Zoom on administrative topics such as understanding SJSU policies, academic standing, coaching on how to use the e-advising tools to choose their electives, planning steps for an internship, referral to campus wellness and accessibility resources and receiving a grad check prior to submitting their degree candidacy plan. One of my favorite outreach events is our alumni and student community impact poster sessions which we have held in conjunction with our iSchool networking receptions at professional conferences. It's been fantastic to observe our students and alumni sharing the spotlight at these events and some have written to me later to let me know how this opportunity has helped them to network and present for the first time at a conference. It's really helped build their confidence in the profession and in some cases led to some exciting professional opportunities. To be successful in the program, we always recommend students stay open and reach out and stay connected with their instructors and support providers if ever they are experiencing an unexpected bump in the road. Take early advantage of all the resources we have to offer from our career development consultant to online tutoring, to scholarships, assistantships and student group leadership opportunities. Stay open to exploring classes, technologies and topics that stretch you toward new possibilities. Hi, I'm Alfredo Alcantar and I'm the iSchool's Learning Management System Services Coordinator and I'm proud to be part of an incredible team of five full-time skilled technology professionals who are dedicated to helping iSchool students succeed by providing personalized assistance and expertise when needed seven days a week. Whether it's creating a customized online tutorial to help students navigate Canvas, meeting one-on-one in Zoom to troubleshoot their technical issues, or simply hopping on a phone called to assist with troubleshooting, our philosophy is high tech, high touch. Set yourself up for success from the start by investing in the right technology. Before enrolling in an online course, make sure that you understand all of the technical requirements, including any required software or hardware. I live for that ah-ha moment when a student understands a new concept or sees how technology applies directly to their lives. When you're feeling frustrated or unmotivated, remember why you chose to start online learning in the first place. And remember to enjoy the journey and to take time to celebrate your accomplishments along the way. Please do not hesitate to reach out to me if you have any questions. I hope to have the opportunity to work with you. Hello, my name is Bethany Winslow and I'm the Director of Online Learning at the School of Information at San Jose State University. My role at the iSchool is somewhat behind the scenes, but I do work closely with other colleagues and our faculty to make sure our students are well prepared to get the most out of their time here and to really become part of the iSchool community. I work with new faculty to help them get acclimated to teaching here, but I'm also the course coordinator for the first course all new incoming students take in their first semester. The online learning tools and strategies for success course covers everything you need to know to get started out on the right foot here. I also recruit and train the peer mentors who take on a teaching assistant role in that course. Peer mentors are some of our very best students about to graduate and they're an incredible resource for our new students. Being an online student can be uniquely challenging, but it offers tremendous opportunities as well. I know of what I speak because I'm a lot like many of our students here and that's what makes me so passionate about what I do. I went back to graduate school later in life. I completed a master's degree in education that was specific to online teaching and learning and my program was 100% online and I was also working full time as an instructional designer in the higher education field and all the programs and courses I worked on were also 100% online. So I've seen things from a lot of different angles but as Oprah says, here's what I know for sure. As with all things in life, you get out of it what you put into it. So being truly mindful is critical. I would encourage you to be particularly attentive to where you invest your time and energy. One of the best places to invest those things is in improving yourself and another place is in cultivating deeply authentic relationships with others, both personal and professional. Whatever path you choose for yourself, I wish you all the best.