All right, good lighting helps my helps my face out. This would be good Look I make sure the wardrobe matches the lighting everything else. I'm good There's no doubt priorities in life right there So it's good. Yeah, I think it's a it's a good question I think when you look at us for the first two weeks of the season, you know verse again each week You play a different defense that presents different challenges, right? So for us There's been some really good moments of drive right you look at week one You have you start the season with 31 plays in two drives, but you don't score the touchdowns, right? So our goal improvement in week two was any better in the red area Which I thought obviously we accomplished better than week one There's gonna be times in the game, right? We're trying to avoid Not being on the field right and getting three and outs and I think for us more importantly Right is our ability to continue to stack good plays on top of each other and then the next drive Right take the next drive as the next drive and don't think about what happened in the last drive good or bad and move forward So for us right from a progression and progress standpoint It's just to continue to stack good place because there's times again, right in each NFL game You can pull out sections good and bad We want to focus on what we're doing well and make sure we continue to do that And then our areas in which the reasons why we're not maybe converting on certain situations Right challenge the coaching staff and us ourselves as players Right that we make sure that we try to fix and eradicate those issues So again if you look at last week, it would be Situations on third down third and one right so again, it's it's not on one person one player one coach It's collectively us coming together and making sure we can sustain those drives because at the end of the day A fourth and one third and one you convert those as an offense You know, obviously that hurts the defense of the defense stops the momentum Obviously is a big deal for the other side. So we're trying to convert those and get better at those as well I think it's I think it's both. I think you come into a situation NFL college high school, whatever you're playing is you can't let the old adage the last play affect you on the next one Because it can beat you and the reality is it's not always when the bad play happens People think okay when a sack or a fumble or an interception, how does that player respond to the next play? I would make the argument that it's both. I make the argument after a great play How does that player respond the next on the very next play? Some guys, you know may lose a little concentration focus because they just made a great play other guys want to Love the fact they made a great play and want to make another one right and stay within the moment So it's it's all of it. It's each play is a new play When you think about it in each drive in each series a new series. So that's that's the mindset we try to make and go forward with Yeah, it goes back to you know, just our roster on offense in general and I know I said it to you guys earlier During these press conferences about our ability to have guys go out there and compete during training camp and have guys be able to play multiple positions and So regardless if it's the wide receiver the position the tight end or anywhere else Whoever's in there regardless of because of injury or because that's just the rotation in which they're going in There's an expectation and standard that guys go in and perform and do their job So it's us regardless of what personnel groupings out there for whatever reason Guys go out there and execute at a high level and do what you're asked to do And us as coaches make sure we put them in a good spot to do it Yeah, now you call him OZ. I know who you're talking about when we went with the name there. I was like where are we going? No, OZ is again like a lot of guys on our team is a Professional in terms of the definition of it and what I mean by that is He knows the plan. He knows the responsibility not just his but if he's forced to play other positions for whatever reason He's prepared. He does the mental work in front of the meetings in terms of studying and when he's in the meetings And you ask him questions. He's ready to go So that obviously gives confidence to not just the coaches, but the players around him So OZ is since I've met him that's been who he is and he's been that that he's been that way Consistently day in day out and as coaches and his teammates you appreciate that about him Yeah, I think from a consistency standpoint it's something that I've shared before in the quarterback room of I think NFL players have to have a large capacity for boredom And what I mean by that is your ability to do the same thing a monotonous thing fundamentally over and over and over And not get tired or sick of it And I think that breeds the consistency no different in any position But specifically the quarterback if the check down is the right play you consistently take the check down If the shot is the right play then you consistently take the shot, but you stay Consistent to what you're asked and you have that capacity to literally stay and play board and not try to be Do the exciting thing because it flashes right stay within yourself. I think that breeds the consistency Yeah again, I think it's a lot of the guys up front. I think you each day I go down to their individual Right for two reasons one right be around those guys see how they work and to right observe Right the different leadership styles or the personalities and more in the practice field and Chris in my opinion Just like other guys on the offensive line He's got a workman's mentality like it's it's serious business to him to make sure He does his job at a high level and he does that From pre-practice to individual through the team drills and then obviously, you know If you do that stuff, you expect the consistency in the game and you've seen that from Chris Sure Yeah, I think it's the approach really of you know with those guys right now You got from lynch room to Jake Matthews to Caleb to Henney to those guys who've been with each other Before I even I got here and they accepting other guys who are coming into the old line room and what coach Ledford and coach Emily have done is they fostered an environment in which allows certain guys To lead their own way and I think you get that from Jake you get that from Chris You get that from any guys let their personalities out and to me You have your best unit when guys can be themselves and that force to be something that they're not and I think you see that from those guys They're truly comfortable in their own skin and they want to lead in their own way Yeah, look, I think I think there's a what I found at least in this league and my experience is Between the white lines, there's a certain personality and then outside the white lines I would argue that a number of guys have a different personality So to me when sure when Chris is between the lines, right? It's workmen do my job execute a high level. It's important to them Now it doesn't mean like we're in the building. That's not the same case in meetings But Chris again, you know, you guys have gotten to know him You know professional on and off the field, you know genuine I think is the best word I can use with him and you can tell a lot of things matter to him that are important And he makes sure that that's forefront for him Yeah, sure, I mean again You go through the different opponents the different matchups things of that nature The way that those two run the football In my mind, right there. They're not just a certain type of a back. They're able to do different Schemes, which you know, we hope moving forward presents issues for the defense But I'll always say this about what those two in particular because obviously I've had previous experience with them in a different place a different life, but they Run with a certain attitude and they make sure that as they move forward during the game They don't let up on that. So it's a mindset of a physicality And to me, right that should bode well as the season continues For both those guys and obviously for the guys up front because they appreciate the way that those guys are running the football Yeah, I mean, I think I said this to you guys last week and I think you guys are seeing with your own eyes During the games and the CP to me is a person like I've said before I've had experience with I've had one-on-one experience with Just us meeting together. I know I like to think I know how his mind works and what he can handle And again, I said to you guys before this a football player He loves football and so it's not just certain aspects of it He loves that everything that comes with it. So again, you know, whatever we feel makes us a better football team a better offense But we're gonna use all of our different pieces the right way And get those guys in position and see he's no different And you went dark right there I mean my mind went a lot of different places, right? I do believe this this level you Coach and player you can't be something that you're not so You have to be genuine and how you approach your job I think the minute that you start to try to be someone or something that you're not I think people see through that So in my mind when these players or coaches are out there You have to their personality has to show because I think you get the full person when that happens I think when you're trying to maybe guard yourself, you're not giving up your whole self So to me regardless if you're talking about me in particular for instance, right? There's a certain level in which I've carried myself and who I think I am and that reflects to how players Respond to me and coaches. I can't all of a sudden try to be I've coached for a lot of different people and a lot of smart guys successful guys, I can't just mimic someone because they were successful Because that's not my personality even though I like some things they might have done I still have to make it my own It's no different than a player just because they see the guy they're competing with or someone our team really successful They still can't be that person. They still have to be who they are and again That's we've never said not to do that. We want these guys to have their personality wanting to be themselves I think you do get the best version of that person when you allow them to be who they are I think it's how you foster the environment, right? I think it's a good question I think it's about you know, how you run your meetings how you're on the practice field How you coach them how you have conversations that don't deal with football and it's about life or about things outside of football and building those relationships and To me right you foster an environment That allows that to occur. I've been with places where that has happened and been with places where that hasn't happened And again just by your experience, right?  So I'm not sure that answer your question We went to a lot of different spots, but my goodness did the best I could my man This No, I think it goes back to what I said earlier about the capacity for boredom I think Matt's a good illustration throughout his career of taking Exactly what the difference presents to him getting the ball I had a certain time in which his players his teammates can catch and run or write the balls out before a protection potential Issue to give more confidence the guys up front So it works hand-in-hand to me that those are the conversations that we have with not just the quarterbacks But with with multiple players about just make the play that's available I think again you start to make plays or you start to do something out of the ordinary Because you're trying to make a play typically right you're it's gonna lead to disaster It might work out once or twice right and there are special players in this league that can go off script Multiple times a game and just make it happen I would argue that the majority of the guys that doesn't typically work out and it gets you in more trouble Which doesn't lead to prosperous outcomes. I mean I Yeah, I mean the reality is you can probably pick a few guys that can go back at certain positions, right? And maybe not run the rod exactly how you drew it up and still find a play or Right, it could be a DB who all of a sudden jumps a route that has no Reason to jump it but he has app. He has intangible. He feels something boom instincts and he takes something I think for the majority guys in this league If you do what you're asked to do under the pressure in which you're asked to do it Like I don't I think you're you have a more successful path I think the minute in pressurized situations, which NFL games are right you start to do something That's out of the ordinary. It probably leads into more trouble than it does success Are we good? Oh Yeah, I need to wear something different next week


Attention Capitol Hill residents, this is a community notification of a new sexually violent predator in your area. Please stay tuned to the following short program for more information. Hi I'm technician Ron Hackett with the Denver Police Department. The sex offender registration and compliance unit at DPD is responsible for the registration monitoring and tracking of all registered sex offenders and sexually violent predators who live in the city and county of Denver. Here's a brief history of sex offender legislation in Colorado. Our state laws trickle down from federal government mandates. In 1994 we had the Jacob Wetterling Act which mandated that states would establish a sex offender list. Magans law of 1996 said that the public would have access to those sex offender registration lists. The Pam Litchner Act of 1996 stated that some offenders might have to have lifetime registrations and the Adam Walsh Act of 2006 unified sex offender laws across the country. In Colorado the legislature has determined that sexually violent predators by definition pose a higher risk to the community at large and therefore mandated that upon their release from the Department of Corrections the community must be notified. Sex offender notification in Colorado happens in two ways. The first is passive and ongoing through the sex offender registration process which is a list maintained by local police departments. The second way is active via community notification for those offenders determined to be sexually violent predators by the courts or by the parole board. Most sex offenders in Colorado are supervised by the criminal justice system in our communities. Most sex offenders engage in crossover behavior which means they may have been arrested for one type of crime but be apt to commit another.  There is no typical sex offender but all tend to be deceptive, manipulative and secretive. 80 to 93 percent of sex offenses are committed by someone known to the victim. Sexual deviancy begins in mid to late adolescence. Sex offenses are not impulsive.  The community has a vested interest in helping offenders to be successfully managed in the community. Sex offenders have the same need for housing and employment as any other citizen. Any citizen who uses sex offender information to harass, threaten, or intimidate an offender will be subject to criminal prosecution. There are approximately 16,500 registered sex offenders in the state of Colorado. About 65 percent of convicted sex offenders are placed in the community on probation. The remainder are in the Department of Corrections or Community Corrections. Offenders may be caught for one type of offense but be at a high risk to commit another type. Crime of conviction is only one indicator of risk.  The offender's residence must be verified quarterly by the Denver Police Department. The full sex offender registration list is available by calling the Denver Police Department Identification Bureau at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Convicted felons and those with multiple convictions are posted online at denvergov.org slash police.   Now, here's a look at the newest sexually violent predator living in Denver. Here's an overview of the registered sex offenders currently living in Denver. There are 2,522 total living within city limits. In Denver Police District 6, there are 448. Precinct 623 has 87 registered sex offenders. Of those, 61 have felony convictions and 26 have misdemeanor convictions. Rudolph Candleria is a sexually violent predator currently living in Denver. He's 52 years old and was born on May 19th, 1970. He's a Hispanic male, 5 feet 11 inches tall, 210 pounds with black hair and brown eyes. He's currently living at 1272 Pennsylvania Street, number 22B in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Denver. Schools located within one mile of this offender include Girls Athletic Leadership Middle School and High School at 750 Gallipago Street, West Middle School and High School at 951 Elate Street, Contemporary Learning Academy at 200 East Ninth Avenue, Downtown Denver Expeditionary and Emily Griffith High School, both at 1860 Lincoln Street, Morey Middle School at 840 East 14th Avenue, Denver Justice High School at 300 East Ninth Avenue, DC 21 at Wyman Middle School and High School at 1690 Williams Street, Compassion Road Academy at 1000 Cherokee Street, Dormore ECE to 8 School at 846 Corona Street, Polaris Elementary at 410 Park Avenue West, John Farley at KW Brill Center at 50 West Fifth Avenue. Parks located within one mile of this offender include Sunken Gardens Park, Benedict Fountain Park, Cheesman Park Esplanade, Denver Botanic Gardens, McIntosh Park, Zekendorf Plaza Park, Grant Humphries Mansion Park, Pioneer Monument Park, Quality Hill Park, Governor's Park, Park Avenue Parks, Civic Center Park, Cheesman Park. Bus routes located within one mile of this offender include Route 10, 12th Avenue and Pennsylvania Street, Route 6, 12th Avenue and Grant Street and 14th Avenue and Grant Street, routes 00L, 3L, 6, 10, 83D, 83L and 87L, 13th Avenue and Lincoln Street, routes 6, 15, 15L and 16, Colfax Avenue and Sherman Street. A brief history of charges against this offender, sexual assault, submit, force, threat, drug, other. He's currently on parole and registered with the Denver Police Department on March 8, 2022 to 1272 Pennsylvania Street, number 22B in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Denver. Pass charges against this offender include sex assault, battery, domestic violence. Rudolph Candelaria has been determined as sexually violent predator after meeting the following criteria. Criteria one, age 18 or older on the date of the offense or under 18 and tried as an adult. The offender was age 36 at the time of the offense. Criteria two, the crime must have been committed honor after July 1, 1997 and convicted honor after July 1, 1999.  The offender was convicted on April 6, 2006 for sexual assault, submit, force, threat, drug, other. Criteria three, the relationship to the victim was one of the following. Victim was a stranger to the offender or the offender established or promoted a relationship with the victim primarily for the purpose of sexual victimization. The victim was a 43 year old female. The offender was known to the victim. Criteria four, positive results or the passing of a risk assessment instrument administered by probation parole staff and a qualified treatment evaluator. Positive results include an assessment for the presence of a mental abnormality, a level of denial regarding the offense, treatment appropriateness and motivation, presence of sexual deviant interests. The offender was evaluated by the La Plata combined courts with positive results determining him to be a sexually violent predator.


First down from water Right here Get online Hey low and hard right that's why we go low and hard I'm going to internal base of fire as soon as we leave this trench or all this has been cut I need to internal base of fire once you leave this trench Roger


The People's Democratic Party Governors Forum has said it would continue its meeting tomorrow with other stakeholders. This is part of efforts to resolve the leadership crisis rocking the party. The meeting was called following the resignation of seven national deputy officers of the party. They had accused the People's Democratic Party National Chairman Uche Secundus of incompetence in handling the party's affairs. The resigned officers are also demanding the resignation of Secundus as the party chairman.


All right, so stop simping and build new earth So here you can see there's a bunch of Instagram stories This is probably a format that I'm gonna follow quite a bit moving forward where there's a posting of the previous days Instagram stories and then there's a streaming that the net following day that breaks down and further amplifies and excites and inspires and Just cuts through simping and inspires Action for building the new world.  That's why rappers and hip-hop artists That's why they can so easily just Go hard on Themselves and about their uniqueness and their gifts and their message and all that stuff There's no contractions or bounds or limits. They just go and It's beautiful because a spiritual cunt is in a straight jacket and they can't handle it Equanimous Peasant dude peasants straight-up peasant dude the world economic forum global elite are gonna eat that up like cake You'll have the spiritual cunts meditating on cushions eating Cockroaches and getting provided rations with the centralized bank digital currencies While the god mode warriors that are activated by Self-realization and that are activated by building the new world are going to go out building the basic needs infrastructures of the new generation and of and of just slaying the matrix tentacles so Here's another one on There was a comment on on tic-tac about On the on the reel that was posted about surrender the whole body to new earth and the question was I'm trying to learn Do you have any book recommendations? And this is a typical thing is to ask about book recommendations and whatnot And there's a way to sort of cut through what is this journey that takes eons to surrender one small self to the Big self and the selfless gifts. So that's why there's a reflection back That's really sharp and that just cuts through the apparent eons of journey to Just get right into it Cleanly so that's why best for the self to get out of the way for the capitalist self Which is everything the self has the codes of the selfless gifts because when one is the capitalist self There is no tendency to want to do Action there's no more doing of action that is related to the small s self Which is unworthiness and seeking validation and trying to get for itself And the thing looking out the eyes is nothing being everything including the body This is usually enough to see through selfing so meaning the thing when the thing that's looking out the eyes is itself Nothing everything when that's the case then it can be integrated into the warrior of the character It can be integrated into building new earth from that place This was also from from a friend that was saying where did you get it that I was free? I'm still lost in my dream 90% of the time. I'm thinking that y'all are going to have to go on without this one I'm too committed to my nightmare. So and there's just a reply of Ragnar from Vikings because All that's all that that's all that you can do especially because the the conversation with this one It's it's like they're they're digging their heels in their own dream So if you're if you're if you're being reflected back that no I'm digging my heels in my dream and that I refuse to to come out You know, right?    You'll take the jabs. You'll say yes, daddy government jab me jab me daddy jab me jab me daddy and all critical thinking will be gone because those programs will be running the show and then What what what we're what we're seeing is we're seeing these these the the most It's crazy because it's the the the prisoners themselves are the ones that are Further solidifying their own jail cells.  So be fearless. So You know, when you see a video that pops up online and it's like the whatever the year the European Union's head of finance or whatever and it's like we're digitizing the euro and now we're going to be overseeing all Transactions and we're gonna be the ones that get to dictate what you can and can't do with your money Basically, they're gonna be the ones that set the limits on your freedom when you see that video That's a light hologram.  I like getting the jobs or I believe in daddy government or Whatever bullshit roar at them fearlessly Roar Roar at them fearlessly for new earth roar at them roar at them because it's just a light hologram.


All right, this is beautiful. This is a Vintage 1974 Nemo Italy Peach Amber Frosted Circles Hanging Swag Lamp, MCM. This is amazing. It's another thing where I'm like, I might wanna keep that, that is so cool. She sold this for $459.99 plus shipping and she paid 45 for that at an estate sale. Hey, fellow buddies, thanks for watching. Just for online, little pony. Amazing, right? All right, let's get started. All right, I've got 37 bolos coming your way. These range from unexpected to big money. And I'm pretty sure there's gonna be quite a few in here that you're gonna be like, hmm, I'm gonna tell you where they got it, what they paid for it and what it sold for. These bolos come from my featured Bolo Buddies members, members of my YouTube channel. If you're interested in joining memberships, there is a link down in the description to join. All right, we are going to get started with some Bolo items. The first item comes from Leo's Treasures. And she does not have a YouTube channel, but this is her eBay store. Super fun, cool items. There is a link to her eBay store down in the description of the video. So definitely check that out. All right, so the first item she sold is this Manhattan Toy Company Chicken Rooster Bandana Hand Puppet from 1995. It is a hard to find item. HTF means hard to find. She paid 80 cents for this at the Goodwill Benz and she took, actually, so she sold it in one day for a full asking price of 54.75 plus shipping. The next item is this Alice in Wonderland teapot. She said that this sat in her money pile because she didn't wanna ship it. I think I've had one of these that I sold also and I was in the same situation. I'm like, how am I gonna ship that thing? But mine sold and I shipped it just fine. But she sold this one for a best offer of $30 in one week and she got it at a garage sale for $1. It is the 150th anniversary teapot here. And you can see it comes apart. It's really, really cute. I'm not sure if mine was the exact same brand. I feel like mine looked different, but it came apart the same way and was kind of awkward to ship. The next item she sold is this Art ART, Arthur Pepper Filigree Enamel Brooch, Flowers, Faux Pearls, Signed Vintage. Let me show you the signature here, ART. And she got this at an estate sale for 50 cents and took a best offer of $20 plus shipping. So don't skip out on that jewelry that you can pick up super cheap and sell for a nice profit. 50 cents into $20, I'm all about that, all day long. The next item comes from Butterfly Hustles and she's been taking a little break from YouTube. I'm hoping she's coming back soon. She has a great channel where she takes you thrifting with her and she is a bolo finder. So go check out her channel and definitely sub her up, super sweet gal. And I actually learned one big money item from her and I have sold it over and over and over again. That is straw hats. So thanks to Butterfly Hustles, I know all about them and somebody, one of my other members, shared in, I don't know, it may be in this video that she found a straw hat and she learned it for me, but I'm not taking credit for that. That was all Butterfly Hustles. All right, let's see what she sold here. She has great taste in finding vintage clothing. This is a vintage pioneer men's wear, or pioneer wear men's corduroy jacket. Check this thing out. Is that snazzy or what? That's pretty cool.  And let's see. She shows you the little imperfections and look at the detail. I love it. She got this at the Goodwill for $14.99 and sold it on Best Offer of $75. The next item is this French artist, Paul Lambert, original oil painting on canvas. And she got this at the Goodwill for $4.50 and took a Best Offer of 125 plus shipping. The next item she sold are these Victoria's Secret silky pajamas. If you do not know vintage Victoria's Secret, discontinued Victoria's Secret can definitely be a nice big money bolo. So always search Victoria's Secret if it looks like an older tag or just search it in general. If it looks discontinued, it doesn't have to be super old. There's certain things that people just love. I know some of the satiny nightgowns can do really good. There is a bra and panty set. It's called Second Skin Satan that is a big money bolo. People search high and low for it and will pay up for it. I haven't checked the market on it lately but it's usually trending pretty high. So check out that brand. If you search eBay, you'll see it. Let's see, she got these at Value Village for $6.99 and took a Best Offer of $87.85 plus shipping. All right, this one comes from Double T's Treasures. Just a girl making a live in thrift in. Check her out on YouTube. Here is her channel and she is linked down below. Also, she is almost to 1,000 subscribers, you guys. So definitely sub her up. Let's help her hit that milestone. All right, what did she pick up? She's a bolo finder for sure. She got this remote at the thrift store for $2 and she sold it for $98.97. It is a Sony remote. It is unbelievable what some remotes go for. Some, I'm gonna say most are bread and butter but this one was definitely big money. It's like you have to put in that, see how it has a number, RMJ801 or TCC5. I'm guessing if you put those numbers in, it will pull it up and it's right here. And that will help you figure out if it's worth money or not. This one is really cool. It's a vintage Seth Thomas Teak brass atomic sunburst wall clock, MCM mid-century modern, absolutely amazing. I gotta tell you, if I ever find an MCM clock, it's gonna be hanging on my wall because I love the looks of these and my husband loves clocks. So we will definitely be keeping it. She got this at the Goodwill for $6 and sold it for $175 with free shipping. Wow. The next item is this Paul and Shark. Never heard of that. It's men's yachting pure silk sailing jacket size extra large, made in Italy. And she sold this for a best offer of 150 and she got it in a Goodwill blue box for approximately $7. So I know they do plush boxes, blue boxes and I know they do jewelry. I did not know that they did clothing. So that's good to know. The next one comes from farm girl Scavenger Noelle and she does a live show that's called Let's Talk About It and it's basically like she picks a category and teaches you guys about all the bolos in that category. So definitely super educational and it's live. So you can ask questions. She usually does that on Thursday nights. She did miss a few sessions because she was working on moving but she is back in session. So check her out. All right. This is super cool. So she got all of these Hallmark ornaments and she picked them up. I believe it was in a state sale and they were a quarter a piece and she lauded them up. So all of these Hallmark ornaments, there were 41 in this lot and these were from 1991. And she did put cake topper in the title which is a unique idea. I use cake topper for toys but never thought about using it for ornaments. So definitely a good idea because these are just small ornaments. All right. So there was that set and then there was this set, 34 from 1995. And then there was this set just to give you an idea of what they look like. 24 of them from 1990. The same person bought them all. And in total, sorry, let me go back here. They paid $329.98 for all three sets of ornaments and I believe the buyer paid the shipping. The next item is this rena wear, vintage rena wear. Stainless still, it's a skillet pan. I've never heard of this brand. She did say that she has a, let's talk about it stainless steel cookware video on her channel. So if you wanna learn more about stainless steel cookware you can search that up on YouTube. It's on her channel. Oh wait, what did she sell that for? She got that for a buck and she sold it for $80.99 plus shipping. All right, this is beautiful. This is a vintage 1974 Nemo Italy peach amber frosted circles hanging swag lamp, MCM. This is amazing. It's another thing where I'm like, I might wanna keep that, that is so cool. She sold this for $459.99 plus shipping and she paid 45 for that at an estate sale. The next item comes from It's All Goods. She does not have an eBay store but if you click on the link below it is gonna take you into all of her listings in this format and you can check out what else she has listed. Again, lots of toys in her store but a really cool, just cool, interesting things that you might not think to pick up. All right, this Disney Radco, Christopher Radco Cinderella ornament, black collection, great shape, see details. So here it is and pretty amazing item. Got this at a garage sale for $15 and she flipped that for $300 and the buyer paid shipping. The next item is this vintage 1995 lava light. It's a lamp, golden color, wax, base cap, number 25 motion, see details. I have no idea what that means but I'm guessing a lava lamp collector may know. Maybe it has something to do with this. She sold this for a best offer of $75 and she got it at the Goodwill for $6. I would be terrified to ship a lava lamp. All right, so I already know about these pipeworks but you may not. This Bolo is definitely one that you might pass by if you don't know about it. I actually featured Eddie Hodges, Hodge Podges, his eBay store and he found a ton of these and he parted them out and he made so much money. I have a video on it. I can't remember which one it is because I've featured him so many times but he's definitely a Bolo finder but I knew about these from him and she ended up selling these for $165 best offer and she got them at Savers for six bucks. So this is what you're looking for. They are called PlaySchool pipeworks and they're like building toys. The next item comes from In the Life of a Reseller formerly known as Designs by Josie. This is her YouTube channel. You can check it out. She hasn't put anything out recently but hopefully she'll have more content coming soon. You can sub her up down below. She got this fax machine at a local auction for $1. It sold in two weeks for $85.50. It's a vintage brother Intel Fax 775 plain paper fax machine working with the original owner's manual. She also sold this wishful thirst trap juice, hyaluronic acid peptid serum.  I don't know, something like that. I don't use that fancy stuff but she got this out of a free beauty box. So she must order beauty boxes and maybe it was something she didn't want. Sold this in 24 hours for $22.49 plus shipping. The next item is this vintage 1983 rainbow bright flat sheet. You gotta love that super, super fun item. If you guys do not know flat sheets or sheets in general that have these vintage nostalgia characters on them can definitely be a Bolo. She got these at her secret source for five bucks and sold them for $61.19 plus shipping. The next item here is this Bolo tie, a very, very cool item. Not be on the lookout Bolo but a Bolo tie. This is marked Sterling. It is beautiful. I don't know what that is. Let's see. I don't know, that is a really good looking tie. Look at that, that is cool. All right, so she sold this on, it was a consignment item and she sold it for $68 plus shipping and I don't know if she does a 50-50 split or how she does it. Most people do a 50-50 split but it really just depends on what you have set up with the person that's giving you the items. Okay, three ducks resale, again, no eBay store but if you click on the link below it's gonna take you into their listings in this format. So you can still check out what they're selling. Oh my goodness, that's funny. It's a little candle holder. So great store, check it out. And she sold this vintage Napco Japan 3D bird plate and it says 1357, so it must be numbered. You can see here, I don't know, does it? Is that maybe to hang it? So it's 3D, it's dimensional, guys. All right, she got this at the Goodwill for $3.75 and sold it for $30 plus shipping. Tell me in the comments, would you have picked up the bird plate or would you have walked right past it? The bird plate with a chip. I'm guessing a lot of you would have skipped it because of the chip. I think I would have. So definitely always learning. Salad servers utensils, beaded handles, peer one. Looks like an item that you could pick up at a garage sale or a thrift store, pretty cheap. Let's see where she got it. She got this at the Goodwill for $2.75 and sold it for 18 plus shipping. Michael Aram, black orchid, handcrafted salt and pepper shakers. Bloopers at the end. All right, let's see. $4.75 at the Goodwill and sold it for a best offer of $50 plus shipping. The next item comes from Gale's Resale in Sea, maybe North Carolina, I don't know.  You can check her out down below. She's also on Poshmark and Mercari. Vintage mask, wall art, Mardi Gras, Harlequin, wall hangings. Let's see. She got this at a garage sale for $1 and she sold them for a best offer but she did not tell me what she sold them for. So I apologize, I do not have that for you. But very unique item and you can see they're not very big. They're only about four and a half inches there. Barbie Dream House 2015 replacement part elevator with doll holder and cord. This came from, it was in a big doll house and she parted it out. So I don't know what the actual price was but it sold for $35.99 and you guys know I like to part out doll houses. This is a cigar cigarette ashtray and this came from a clean out. So she got it free and sold it for $34.01. Some ashtrays can be big money. So nickel on bottom, what's that mean? Nickel, good condition. Oh, nickel, nickel, nickel on bottom. All right. All right. Let's see. We have one Stop Shop 59. Again, really cool, neat vintage items. Whoa, look at that bat. Eek! I like looking through the stores. All right. Coca-Peli, I think I said that right. Stoneware Square Brown Southwestern Design by Mara Mug. Let's get a glimpse at the bottom here. Oh wow, it's actually like, looks like it's carved or handwritten in there. She got this for $2 at a thrift store and sold it for $30.42 plus shipping. This is a Rain Tree Big Large Mouth Bass Solid Brass Belt Buckle. I thought it was a wall hanging at first. Right there you go. And this one came from her money pile and it sold fast for $24.95. So I don't know about you guys but I have a huge money pile and I know sometimes I list those items and they sell really quick. And I'm like, why wasn't I listing these? It's because you buy too much stuff and then it just, you wanna do the new stuff and then you put the stuff to the side and you just never get to it. Does anybody else have the money pile problem? Raise your hand. Raise your hand. I see you in the comments, I see you. All right, woolen needle point pillowcase, sham egg nest, space green. It's like a needle point thing here. And it looks like it's already complete. It says tapestry. All right, she bought a huge box lot of these. So has, it says a penny in this. So she must've got them really cheap. One has sold, she has two more left and this sold for $25.23. So a penny into $25 is awesome and the buyer paid shipping. Lola's trunk treasures. This is her eBay store. Again, all of the links to the eBay stores and channels are down below. Definitely recommend that you check out these Bolo finders and she sold these plates. Gottinger, Jarden butterfly leaves garden pattern, salad plates with gold trim. Thrift store paid $10 form and sold those for $45.99 with free shipping. All right, this one is a schoolgirls work, Samplers from Spencer Museum of Art. Is it a book? I'm not really certain. Yeah, looks like it's a book. And this sold for $79.99 and it says that it is cross stitch sample designs. So maybe it's not a book and she got it at the Goodwill for $2. Wow. Okay, so it's a book of sample designs for cross stitch. That is interesting. And it's sold for full asking price with free shipping. That's really cool. And Stratigo, Stratigo, Star Wars Stratigo. I feel like I've heard of that, but never played it. Anybody ever played this game? Is it fun? It's from 2002. So how old would I have been 20 years ago? Yeah, probably not playing board games. All right, Goodwill $5.80. Best offer of $73 on that with free shipping. The Rebel reseller is next and she is a Bolo Finder. She sells tons of plus. She has a live working hangout on Wednesdays. So definitely check that out. It's a great, fun hangout. She usually has two people on there with her and they list and just chat with everybody in the chat. But definitely check out her once sold. She is a Bolo Finder, but she is not afraid to sell bread and butter either. She also mentioned one time that she paid her mortgage for the year with bread and butter items. So don't pass up those bread and butter items. Let's see what she sold. She sold this F&B gumdrop doll from 1962. She took a best offer of $100 on this and she got it at an estate sale for seven bucks. Let me see. There is the little tag and this is what I was looking for. Right here on the neck. Most dolls have the writing on the neck. You definitely wanna show a picture of that. She sold this Tamagotchi virtual pet from 2004. These are a Bolo if you do not know. They're little key chains, but I guess you like from what I understand, I've been told you have to like interact with them or something. I don't know. I never played with one of these, but there's been a lot of hype about these and she sold this for $75 and she got it from a friend for free and the buyer paid shipping on that. The next one sold on Etsy. It is a Lisa Frank Markey Unicorn Mini Backpack. Now, if you notice, it says Lisa lowercase, Frank lowercase. From what I understand, the big L and the big F are the vintage ones and they are coming back out with the big L and the big F because that used to be how you knew it was older, but now they're doing reproduction. So you gotta be really careful with Lisa Frank. I'm not sure what timeframe the small L and the small FR. If anybody knows, let me know down in the comments, but that is how you determine when they were made. But again, those reproductions are coming out. So be careful because they might get you. She sold this on Etsy, listed two years ago and she cross-posted it to Etsy and it sold for $123.45. She's got vintage from the 90s. So maybe, I don't know, I was thinking the little L and the little F wasn't as old, but maybe this is when it first switched over. I'm not 100% sure. I'm definitely not a Lisa Frank buff. So some of you I'm sure know about Lisa Frank. So let us know in the comments. All right, we've got Donna Telebotelino and what did she sell? She sold. Well, first off, let's talk about her channel. She sells to us, the reseller. She buys things wholesale. She buys from liquidators. And when I say liquidators, like estate liquidators, storage lockers, she's one of the best sources I've ever seen. The stuff she brings to her auctions are amazing. But anyway, she used to own a thrift store a long time ago and she has a lot of connections that call her up and bring her the deals. And they know what she does and they know they have to give her a good deal because she needs to give us a good deal. So check her out if you're looking for inventory. She will be linked down below as well. Right now she's currently on vacation with her kids. And you can see right here, she's with T, her auction partner. They go back and forth on each other's channel. So make sure you're subscribed to Auction for you also. And let's see what Donna sold on eBay. Not a whole lot. Her store is pretty low right now because she mostly focuses on YouTube but tries to keep her eBay account active because as a reseller, you wanna have other options and she wants to keep her feedback up and stuff like that. So she does list from time to time and she wants to be on this video. So she's gotta sell something. All right, this first one, are you ready for this? Louis Vuitton loafers. And she actually had a friend that asked her to consign these for her. And Donna being like the person that she is, she gave her all the money. Donna sold these for full asking price of $600 with free shipping and she just gave all the money back to her friend. So definitely very sweet of her and very nice pair of shoes. Brand new, never worn in the original box, $600 free shipping, that is awesome. She also sold these vintage Power Rangers. Oh goodness. Vintage Power Ranger. Oh my God, I say Rangers tonight. There's gonna be some more bloopers at the end. Vintage Power Rangers, evil space alien, three piece. She sold these for $80 with free shipping. And the next item is this Adams and Brooks Coffee, Rio original roast coffee candy. I don't know where she got this, but it's a retail arbitrage item, obviously. She's selling these for $11.11 with free shipping. And if you guys know Donna, you know what $11.11 means to her. So I'm guessing that's why she chose that for this candy and she has free shipping on this. So if you guys watch Donna and love Donna, drop a comment down in the description if you made it this far. All right, you guys, thank you so much for watching. Be sure to like, comment, subscribe and share. Let me get back to full screen here. This is a Michael arm or Ram. I don't know if that, I don't know. Black orchard, orchard, orchard. Okay, let's try this again. There are gonna be some videos popping up here and here. A subscribe button and another video down here. Thank you for being here. If you would like to join memberships to be in a video like this, it is level two, it's $4.99 a month. My channel is completely free. The memberships are for perks to be in videos like this. Thank you so much and I'll see you at the next one. Thanks for watching.


In this video, we're going to look at square, cube and triangular numbers, what they are, how they can be useful and some of the patterns they form. A square number is the result of multiplying an integer by itself. A process known as squaring. For example, 4 times 4 equals 16. So 16 is a square number. They are called square numbers because these particular numbers of objects can be arranged in a perfect solid square. They are useful for dealing with quadratics, simplifying surds and in area. See if you can list the first 10 square numbers. Pause and try now. How did you do? In a multiplication table, they are found by going diagonally from top left to bottom right. The nth term of a square number is simple. It's just n squared. They link with both cube and triangular numbers and we'll see how soon. Cube numbers are similar to square numbers in that they are the product of the same integer. However, a cube number is that integer multiplied by itself three times or cubed. For example, 2 times 2 times 2 equals 8. So 8 is a cube number. They are called cube numbers because like the square numbers, they can form a perfectly filled cube shape. The nth term of a cube sequence is again a simple one, n to the power of 3. In maths, they appear often in graphing and iterations, but mostly in topics like volume. Can you list the first 10 cube numbers? Be warned, this is trickier than before. Pause the video and have a go. How did you do? Our final look is at triangular numbers. A triangle number is the number of objects you can arrange in a perfectly filled equilateral triangle. Another way to look at this is each time you increase the number, you increase the previous gap by 1. 1 to 3 has a gap of 2. 3 to 6 has a gap of 3. 6 to 10 has a gap of 4 and so on. You can imagine this by stacking equilateral triangles. For example, the first triangular number is 1 with the row of triangles. The second triangular number has two rows, giving three triangles. The third number needs three rows, so give six triangles and so on. See if you can work out the remaining first 10 triangular numbers. The nth term for finding a triangular number is n to the power of 2 plus n divided by 2. You can find this because the triangular numbers are a quadratic sequence. See this video here for more information. Now for the clever bit. If you look carefully, between the colored triangles are white triangles, the opposite way round. If you count all these triangles, you get another sequence of numbers. 1, 4, 9, 16. Familiar? Yes, these are square numbers again. You can also see triangle and square numbers together in this pattern. If you count alternating colors exactly, you get triangular numbers. If you count the total, you guessed it, square numbers. So there you have the basics of square, cube and triangular numbers.


From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. A new era of data is upon us and we're in a state of transition. You know, even our language reflects that. We rarely use the phrase big data anymore. Rather we talk about digital transformation or digital business or data-driven companies. Many have come to the realization that data is and not the new oil because unlike oil, the same data can be used over and over for different purposes. We still use terms like data as an asset. However, that same narrative when it's put forth by the vendor and practitioner communities includes further discussions about democratizing and sharing data. Let me ask you this, when was the last time you wanted to share your financial assets with your coworkers or your partners or your customers? Hello everyone and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights, powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we want to share our assessment of the state of the data business. We'll do so by looking at the data mesh concept and how a leading financial institution, JPMorgan Chase, is practically applying these relatively new ideas to transform its data architecture. Let's start by looking at what is the data mesh? As we've previously reported many times, data mesh is a concept and set of principles that was introduced in 2018 by Jamak Deghani, who's Director of Technology at ThoughtWorks. It's a global consultancy and software development company. And she created this movement because her clients who are some of the leading firms in the world had invested heavily in predominantly monolithic data architectures that had failed to deliver desired outcomes in ROI. So her work went deep into trying to understand that problem. And a main conclusion that came out of this effort was the world of data is distributed and shoving all the data into a single monolithic architecture is an approach that fundamentally limits agility and scale. Now a profound concept of data mesh is the idea that data architectures should be organized around business lines with domain context. That the highly technical and hyper-specialized roles of a centralized cross-functional team are a key blocker to achieving our data aspirations. This is the first of four high-level principles of data mesh. So first, again, that the business domain should own the data end to end rather than have it go through a centralized big data technical team. Second, a self-service platform is fundamental to a successful architectural approach where data is discoverable and shareable across an organization and an ecosystem. Third, product thinking is central to the idea of data mesh. In other words, data products will power the next era of data success. And fourth, data products must be built with governance and compliance that is automated and federated. Now there's a lot more to this concept and there are tons of resources on the web to learn more, including an entire community that is formed around data mesh. But this should give you a basic idea. Now the other point is that in observing Jamak Tagani's work, she has deliberately avoided discussions around specific tooling, which I think has frustrated some folks because we all like to have references that tie to products and tools and companies. So this has been a two-edged sword in that on the one hand it's good because data mesh is designed to be tool agnostic and technology agnostic. On the other hand, it's led some folks to take liberties with the term data mesh and claim mission accomplished when their solution may be more marketing than reality. So let's look at JP Morgan Chase and their data mesh journey. It's why I got really excited when I saw this past week, a team from JPMC held a meetup to discuss what they called data lake strategy via data mesh architecture. I saw that title, I thought, well, that's a weird title. And I wondered, are they just taking their legacy data lakes and claiming they're now transformed into a data mesh? But in listening to the presentation, which was over an hour long, the answer is a definitive no, not at all in my opinion. A gentleman named Scott Hurleman organized the session that comprised these three speakers here, James Reed, who's a divisional CIO at JPMC. Arup Nanda, who is a technologist and architect and Sarita Baxed, who is an information architect, again, all from JPMC. This was the most detailed and practical discussion that I've seen to date about implementing a data mesh. And this is JP Morgan's, their approach, and we know they're extremely savvy and technically sound and they've invested, I mean, it has to be billions in the past decade on data architecture across their massive company. And rather than dwell on the downsides of their big data past, I was really pleased to see how they're evolving their approach in embracing new thinking around data mesh. So today, we're going to share some of the slides that they used and comment on how it dovetails into the concept of data mesh that Jamak Degani has been promoting. And at least as we understand it and dig a bit into some of the tooling that is being used by JP Morgan, particularly around its AWS cloud. So the first point is it's all about business value. JPMC, they're in the money business. And in that world, business value is everything. So JR Reed, the CIO, showed this slide and talked about their overall goals, which centered on a cloud-first strategy to modernize the JPMC platform. I think it's simple and sensible, but there's three factors on which he focused, cut costs always, sure, got to do that. Number two was about unlocking new opportunities or accelerating time to value. But I was really happy to see number three, data reuse. That's a fundamental value ingredient in the slide that he's presenting here. And his commentary was all about aligning with the domains and maximizing data reuse, i.e., data is not like oil and making sure there's appropriate governance around that. Now, don't get caught up in the term data lake. I think it's just how JP Morgan communicates internally. It's invested in the data lake concept, so they use water analogies. They use things like data puddles, for example, which are single project data marts or data ponds, which comprise multiple data puddles. And these can feed in to data lakes. And as we'll see, JPMC doesn't strive to have a single version of the truth from a data standpoint that resides in a monolithic data lake. Rather, it enables the business lines to create and own their own data lakes that comprise fit for purpose data products. And they do have a single truth of metadata. We'll get to that. But generally speaking, each of the domains will own end to end their own data and be responsible for those data products. We'll talk about that more. Now the genesis of this was sort of a cloud first platform. JPMC is leaning into public cloud, which is ironic since in the early days of cloud, all the financial institutions were like, never. Well, anyway, JPMC is going hard after it. They're adopting agile methods and microservices architectures. And it sees cloud as a fundamental enabler, but it recognizes that on-prem data must be part of the data mesh equation. Here's a slide that starts to get into some of that generic tooling and then we'll go deeper. And I want to make a couple of points here that tie back to Jamak Degani's original concept. The first is that unlike many data architectures, this puts data as products right in the fat middle of the chart. The data products live in the business domains and are at the heart of the architecture. The databases, the Hadoop clusters, the files and APIs on the left-hand side, they serve the data product builders, the specialized roles on the right-hand side, the DBAs, the data engineers, the data scientists, the data analysts that we could have put in, quality engineers, et cetera. They serve the data products because the data products are owned by the business, they inherently have the context and that is the middle of this diagram. And you can see at the bottom of the slide the key principles include domain thinking and end-to-end ownership of the data products. They build it, they own it, they run it, they manage it. At the same time, the goal is to democratize data with a self-service as a platform. One of the biggest points of contention on Datamesh is governance and as Sarita Bax said on the meetup, metadata is your friend and she kind of made a joke. She said this sounds kind of geeky but it's important to have a metadata catalog to understand where data resides and the data lineage and overall change management. So to me, this really passed the Datamesh stink tests pretty well. Let's look at data as products. CIO Reed said the most difficult thing for JPMC was getting their heads around data products and they spent a lot of time getting this concept to work. Here's the slide they used to describe their data products as it related to their specific industry. They said a common language in taxonomy is very important and you can imagine how difficult that was. They said, for example, it took a lot of discussion and debate to define what a transaction was. But you can see at a high level, these three product groups around wholesale, credit risk, party and trade and position data as products and each of these can have sub-products like party will have no your customer, KYC for example. So a key for JPMC was to start at a high level and iterate to get more granular over time. So lots of decisions had to be made around who owns the products and the sub-products. The product owners interestingly had to defend why that product should even exist, what boundaries should be in place and what data sets do and don't belong in the various products. And this was a collaborative discussion. I'm sure there was contention around that between the lines of business. And which sub-products should be part of these circles? They didn't say this, but tying it back to data mesh, each of these products, whether in a data lake or data hub or data pond or data warehouse, data puddle, each of these is a node in the global data mesh that is discoverable and governed. And supporting this notion, Sarita said that this should not be infrastructure bound. Logically, any of these data products whether on-prem or in the cloud can connect via the data mesh. So again, I felt like this really stayed true to the data mesh concept. Well, let's look at some of the key technical considerations that JPM discussed in quite some detail. This chart here shows a diagram of how JPMorgan thinks about the problem. And some of the challenges they had to consider were how to write to various data stores. Can you and how can you move data from one data store to another? How can data be transformed? Where is the data located? Can the data be trusted? How can it be easily accessed? Who has the right to access that data? These are all problems that technology can help solve. And to address these issues, our group Nanda explained that the heart of this slide is the data ingestor instead of ETL. All data producers and contributors, they send their data to the ingester and the ingester then registers the data. So it's in the data catalog. It does a data quality check and attracts the lineage. Then data is sent to the router, which persists in the data store based on the best destination is informed by the registration. This is designed to be a flexible system. In other words, the data store for a data product is not fixed. It's determined at the point of inventory and that allows changes to be easily made in one place. The router simply reads that optimal location and sends it to the appropriate data store. Now, as you see, the schema and fur there is used when there is no clear schema on write. In this case, the data product is not allowed to be consumed until the schema is inferred and then the data goes into a raw area and the inferrer determines the schema and then updates the inventory system so that the data can be routed to the proper location and properly tracked. So that's some of the detail of how the sausage factory works in this particular use case. It was very interesting and informative. Now, let's take a look at the specific implementation on AWS and dig into some of the tooling. As described in some detail by a Rupenanda, this diagram shows the reference architecture used by this group within JP Morgan and it shows all the various AWS services and components that support their data mesh approach. So start with the authorization block right there underneath the kinesis. The lake formation is the single point of entitlement and has a number of buckets, including you can see there, the raw area that we just talked about, a trusted bucket, a refined bucket, et cetera. Depending on the data characteristics at the data catalog registration block where you see the glue catalog, that determines in which bucket the router puts the data. And you can see the many AWS services in use here. Identity, the EMR, the Elastic Map Reduce Cluster from the legacy Hadoop work done over the years. The Redshift Spectrum and Athena, JPMC uses Athena for single threaded workloads and Redshift Spectrum for nested types that they can be queried into, so they can be queried independent of each other. Now remember, very importantly, in this use case, there is not a single lake formation. Rather multiple lines of business will be authorized to create their own lakes and that creates a challenge. So how can that be done in a flexible and automated manner? And that's where the data mesh comes into play. So JPMC came up with this federated lake formation accounts idea and each line of business can create as many data producer or consumer accounts as they desire and roll them up into their master line of business lake formation account. And they cross connect these data products in a federated model. These all roll up into a master glue catalog so that any authorized user can find out where a specific data element is located. This is like a superset catalog that comprises multiple sources and syncs up across the data mesh. So again, to me, this was a very well thought out and practical application of data mesh. Yes, it includes some notion of centralized management but that much of that responsibility has been passed down to the lines of business. It does roll up to a master catalog but that's a metadata management effort and seems compulsory to ensure federated and automated governance. As well at JPMC, the office of the chief data officer is responsible for ensuring governance and compliance throughout the federation. All right, so let's take a look at some of the suspects in this world of data mesh and bring in the ETR data. Now of course, ETR doesn't have a data mesh category. There's no such thing as a data mesh vendor. You build a data mesh, you don't buy it. So what we did is we used the ETR dataset to select and filter on some of the culprits that we thought might contribute to the data mesh to see how they're performing. This chart depicts a popular view that we often like to share. It's a two dimensional graphic with net score or spending momentum on the vertical axis and market share or pervasiveness in the dataset on the horizontal axis. And we filtered the data on sectors such as analytics, data warehouse and adjacencies to things that might fit into data mesh. And we think that these pretty well reflect participation of data mesh. It's certainly not all-encompassing and it's a subset obviously of all the vendors could play in this space. Let's make a few observations. Now as is often the case, Azure and AWS, they're almost literally off the charts with very high spending velocity and a large presence in the market. Oracle you can see also stands out because much of the world's data lives inside of Oracle databases. It doesn't have the spending momentum or growth but the company remains prominent. And you can see Google Cloud doesn't have nearly the presence in the dataset but its momentum is highly elevated. Remember that red dotted line there, that 40% line indicates anything over that indicates elevated spending momentum. Let's go to Snowflake. Snowflake is consistently shown to be the gold standard in net score in the ETR dataset. It continues to maintain highly elevated spending velocity in the data. In many ways, Snowflake with its data marketplace and its data cloud vision and data sharing approach fit nicely into the data mesh concept. Now caution you, Snowflake has used the term data mesh in its marketing but in our view it lacks clarity and we feel like they're still trying to figure out how to communicate what that really is. But there's really, we think a lot of potential there to that vision. Databricks is also interesting because the firm has momentum and we expect further elevated levels in the vertical axis and upcoming surveys especially as it readies for its IPO. The firm is a strong product and managed service and is really one to watch. Now we included a number of other database companies for obvious reasons like Redis and Mongo, MariaDB, Couchbase and Teradata. SAP as well as in there but that's not all database but SAP is prominent so we included them and as is IBM more of a database, traditional database player also with the big presence. Cloudera includes Hortonworks and HPE Esmeral comprises the MapR business that HPE acquired. So this, these guys got the big data movement started between Cloudera, Hortonworks which was born out of Yahoo which was the early big data, sorry early Hadoop, innovator, MapR went as kind of an own course and now that's all kind of come together in various forms. And of course we've got Talon and Informatica are there. They're two integration data integration companies that are worth noting. We also included some of the AI and ML specialists and data science players in the mix like DataRobot who just did a monster $250 million round DataIQ, H2O.AI and ThoughtSpot which is all about democratizing data and injecting AI and I think fits well into the data mesh concept. And you know we put VMware cloud in there for reference because it really is the predominant on-prem infrastructure platform. All right, let's wrap with some final thoughts here. First, thanks a lot to the JP Morgan team for sharing this data. I really want to encourage practitioners and technologists go to watch the YouTube of that meetup we'll include it in the link of this session. And thank you to Jamak Degani and the entire data mesh community for the outstanding work that you're doing and challenging the established conventions of monolithic data architectures. The JPM presentation, it gives you real credibility. It takes data mesh well beyond concept and demonstrates how it can be and is being done. And you know, this is not a perfect world. You're going to start somewhere and there's going to be some failures. The key is to recognize that shoving everything into a monolithic data architecture won't support massive scale and agility that you're after. It's maybe fine for smaller use cases and small firms, but if you're building a global platform and a data business, it's time to rethink data architecture. Now, much of this is enabled by the cloud, but cloud first doesn't mean cloud only. Doesn't mean you'll leave your on-prem data behind. On the contrary, you have to include non-public cloud data in your data mesh vision, just as JPMC has done. You got to get some quick wins. That's crucial so you can gain credibility within the organization and grow. One of the key takeaways from the JPMorgan team is there is a place for dogma like organizing around data products and domains and getting that right. On the other hand, you have to remain flexible because technologies are going to come, technology is going to go. So you got to be flexible in that regard. And look, if you're going to embrace the metaphor of water, like puddles and ponds and lakes, we suggest, maybe a little tongue in cheek, but still we believe in this, that you expand your scope to include data oceans, something John Furrier and I have talked about and laughed about extensively in theCUBE. Data oceans, it's huge. It's the new data lake, go transcend data lake. Think oceans. And think about this, just as we're evolving our language, we should be evolving our metrics. Much of the last decade of big data was around just getting the stuff to work, getting it up and running, standing up infrastructure, managing massive, how much data you got, massive amounts of data. And there were many KPIs built around, again, standing up that infrastructure and gesting data, a lot of technical KPIs. This decade is not just about enabling better insights, it's more than that. Data mesh points us to a new era of data value and that requires new metrics around monetizing data products. Like how long does it take to go from data product conception to monetization? How does that compare to what it is today? And what is the time to quality? If the business owns the data and the business has the context, the quality that comes out of them out of the chute should be at a basic level pretty good and at a higher mark than out of a big data team with no business context. Automation, AI and very importantly, organizational restructuring of our data teams will heavily contribute to success in the coming years. So we encourage you, learn, lean in and create your data future. Okay, that's it for now. Remember, these episodes, they're all available as podcasts wherever you listen. All you got to do is search Breaking Analysis Podcast and please subscribe. Check out ETR's website at ETR.plus for all the data and all the survey information. We publish a full report every week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com and you can get in touch with us. Email me david.volante at siliconangle.com. You can DM me at dvolante or you can comment on my LinkedIn posts. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Have a great week everybody. Stay safe, be well and we'll see you next time.


When we talk about the new data economy, we worry a lot about privacy, we worry about questions of, you know, freedom. But, you know, we don't often ask, well, what kind of society are we building? You know, what kind of social order? How is inequality going to look like in that society? So, you know, this is what I'm going to try to present today, and of course a lot of this is speculative because the society hasn't yet fully come into being. The modern digital economy is built upon an implicit Fossian bargain. On the one hand, companies provide services for free, right, tempting us, like first, with universal knowledge at the tip of our keyboard. But in order to access this information, we have to give away our soul, you know, to continue the Fossian metaphor, leaving behind little bits of data that are so many indications of who we really are or what we really do. So, you know, why does this matter? Okay? And as I said earlier, there are legitimate worries about freedom, privacy, democracy, as in the, you know, Cambridge Analytica case. But my own view is that it matters because the Fossian bargain is enabling the rise of a new kind of society, a new kind of social order. We've had this term, the new oil, nearly cross the president of the European Commission, famously referred to data as the new oil in 2012. People are now saying the new electricity. You know, what he meant and what people mean by this is not simply that data is a profitable sector, but that data generation, refinement and use is actually the new fuel powering the entire economy. And, you know, we can legitimately ask ourselves, well, is this oil really new? You know, are we really in a sort of new stage of sort of economic development in which data really becomes, you know, launches us, if you will, in a completely different kind of regime? And to some extent, it isn't. You know, it might be worth posing at this point and ask ourselves, you know, how did we get there? You know, how did we begin to see personal data as the new oil? You know, where did we begin doing this? After all, if we look back, surveillance in the economy, that is, as Oscar Gandhi puts it, the capture or information for the purpose of producing intelligence or strategically useful knowledge is nothing new. Businesses have always had what Gandhi calls a legitimate business interest in collecting data about their consumers, their employees or their competitors.  And of course, there are many examples. If we look back in history, we can think of the rise of credit, the rise of insurance, the rise of marketing industries as, you know, having been enabled by the emergence of personal profiling in the name of precisely that kind of legitimate interest. So, what I will do is I will actually develop the example of credit because I think, if we think about the history of credit, we see encapsulated in it some very fundamental processes that can help us understand, you know, what our future may be, you know, what is it that, you know, credits, if you will, might stand in for something much bigger. So, we have, if you think about credit, we have moved from a situation in the 1960s where essentially you were inside the credit market or you were outside. If you were inside the credit market, the conditions didn't vary too much across consumers, right? And if you were outside, you didn't have access to credit or you could maybe obtain credit but with sort of loan sharks and sort of more shady kinds of suppliers. By the 1990s and even more than 2000, increasingly, you know, the market expands massively and what we have is we have an increasing differentiation of people on the basis of this numerical information. So, the purpose of a profile now changes and it's not so much about deciding whether the person should be given credit or not. It becomes, should, you know, under which, at which terms should that person obtain credit. So, it is, the purpose is now to assign on the basis of that information, the individual to a prediction. What are the chances that such a person will repay her loan? And you can think about this in every domain, right? What are the person, the chances that such a person has diabetes, you know, that they will have an accident and so on and so forth. So, this is, you know, this is the rise of predictive analytics, okay? So, that, you know, we have the development, as I said, the development of the credit reporting infrastructure, but of course that's true of other kinds of infrastructure allowed for centralization of surveillance, you know. Now, you know, with, armed with this instrument, you could expand your business to all kinds of populations on the strengths of the records held by the credit reporting agencies. And the real important change in the 1980s is the rise of pre-score, a statistical scoring tool using credit bureau data, which was developed by the Fair Isaac and Company in the mid-1980s, which now allowed banks to increasingly seek consumers that were pre-screened, okay? So, scoring, you know, facilitates this assignment of an individual to a class or a category for the purpose of decision-making. And the development of credit scoring was a decisive step, allowing lending decisions to be now largely automated and, of course, this is one of the things that should, the massive expansion of credit and debt in the American economy. But predictive analytics not only enables better risk predictions, it can also be mobilized to harness value. So, in other words, you can actually score conditionally on the risk level. So, the question is now different. Given someone's score or they're fitting into a predicted category, how much value can I possibly extract? Okay? So, there's two questions that are quite different, right? One is, you calculate the risk that an individual represents or the likelihood that a certain outcome will be realized. Two, you know, on the basis of your knowledge of this outcome, how much money can you make? Okay?  You know, depends on a lot of other considerations and behavioral data. So, for instance, you may be scoring on the likelihood that someone may be tempted by a crappy loan offer or, you know, a crappy insurance plan. Now it becomes, you know, about trying to evaluate a lot of other things about who they are. Okay? This is where, you know, the financial behavior meets all kinds of other types of behavior. So, the point now, okay, is very important. The point is to estimate the value or the profits to be made from particular individuals in known that is in predicted situations. So, from an economics point of view, for those of you who know a little bit of economics, this is trying to manage the willingness to pay. How do we think about this process sociologically? Which is really what interests me here, you know? What do we have here? You know, what kind of society are we preparing ourselves for? We can think of the totality of one's interactions with the digital economy, if you will, as a sort of form of capital in the sense of bourgeois, that is, as it calls it, accumulated labor, which has a potentiality to produce profits. We call this urban capital, okay? And the reason is that it is a form of capital that results from everything, right? So, we have to find a trend that sort of captures that sort of status, right? It overlaps with the traditional forms identified by Bourdieu, like it overlaps, for instance, with your cultural capital, but at the same time, it departs from them. You know, it has a clear materiality and it could take in principle a numerical form. It is accumulated over the long history of a person's recorded action built up from traces left on everything, from social media to credit bureaus to shopping websites and fidelity programs, courthouses, pharmacies and the contents, of course, of your emails and chats. It incorporates your social ties, which are now measurable, right, through the value of your social network and, you know, some measure of your moral worth, okay? So, you can think about this as a potentiality, right? So, we call it urban capital. We have a larger term for it for the computer scientist among you, which is Eigencapital. And, you know, it's a little bit Eigencapital. It's a little bit as if each system in your life was doing something like the credit scoring system, right? So, on the financial side, you know, you have a credit score. But your social network data can be also subject to the same kind of scoring processes, right?  So, you can imagine this as a sort of, as a vector, right? In a vector space among the thousands of dimensions of data that all of these companies are keeping about you, okay? And so, if you think of a God's, you know, of a God's view on you, that would be urban capital. If you think more about the individual protections, that's the, you know, that's the Eigencapital. So, like cultural capital, urban capital may exist in three, under three principle forms. The first form is that it is embodied.  You know, that's the Foucailian truth. At the same time, it is also, it is objectivated or objectified. It is realizing the forms of access to goods and services. So, when you have the capital, right, a certain kind of measured worth, if you will, you get access to certain goods and services, better social consideration, better prices. You know, you bought early on the plane. You don't have to wait when you call customer service, right? And it is finally institutionalized in the sense that it may exist as a quantity that is widely used and, you know, the kind of labor use that I mentioned earlier, where, you know, it goes from credit to housing, to insurance and so on and so forth. It can circulate, okay? It can circulate also in, you know, very far away corners. So, you know, dating websites today increasingly are using your credit score, okay? So, the way that I'm thinking about Uber capital is, if you will, as a potentiality, right? The technology is driving us in a particular direction, right? To the creation of sort of these increasingly measured qualities at the, you know, of the individual on different markets. But it doesn't exist as a fully coherent institutionalized thing. It doesn't exist as a number I couldn't tell you. Uber capital is like 596. Of course, people, you know, worry about the political consequences of this big brother type of system. But perhaps more profound and more interesting are the consequences in terms of social stratification and inequality, okay? So, you know, the road to increasing efficiency and profits will be now to match, right, individuals to what algorithm determines they deserve, right? That will be, you know, the process of value extraction, if you will, will capitalize on people's behavior, their dispositions, their habits, you know, refracted, of course, through the very particular classificatory architecture of the digital economy. Now, this is not new. Inequality has always been moralized, right? All form of dominations have been buttressed by distinctions between the deserving and the undeserving. And of course, this is the base that we have constantly about the welfare state. You know, do people deserve the social benefits that they have access to, right? This is how systems of power always legitimate themselves. But in this particular case, you can see that this is a system that is going to be harder to contest politically. The reason is that first mobilization in this kind of system doesn't come about naturally, right?  The social collectives that actual practices produce are just sort of aggregations of people. Right now, you know, there's no natural solidarity among them, right? They're not solidaristic communities bound by categorical statues or by voluntary choice. That's the first point.  But second, in this system, outcomes appear to be legitimate. In China, sesame credit is quite well accepted because it is seen as increasing trust, as Shao Jinqin, and I'm quoting from an article from the Zhechou Statue, actually, as Shao Jinqin from the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Informatization, which is in charge of the Honest Shanghai app, put it in a response to an interviewer. It is all about bringing order to the market. And ultimately, it's also about social order. So that's, you know, and this more, this remoralization of the whole system comes from the fact that differences in outcomes are seen to emanate only from behavioral differences, right? Rather than some other sort of difference, like categorical differences, you know, men and women, you know, discrimination, whatever, which are protected by law. In this case, it's just you. It's your fault, right? And therefore, those who, whether individuals or corporate entities who are outside, are really truly outside. They are truly outside because the principle of their exclusion seems to lie truly within them, within them. And, you know, as an article in Wired puts it in the end, it's just you. So you can see now the social force of this kind of system, right? And of course, it's not lost to the designers in China. In the city of Rongcheng, oh, sorry, the other quote was from the Wired article. This is from the Zhechou Statue. In the city of Rongcheng, a civil servant tells a journalist from the Deutsche Zeitung who has come to inquire about his city's pioneering role in this domain. We want to civilize people. He proudly cites the founding document of the Office of Honesty of the City of Rongcheng, allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere and are heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step. Now, of course, whether the system will work the way it's supposed to, you know, whether it will be something totally fictional, you know, garbage numbers that people ignore, or whether it will be something in between, like it kind of works, but not exactly how it's supposed to, we don't know yet. But if the Chinese situation is a guide to the potential appeal of universal scoring and remembering that similar if more decentralized tendencies artwork on this side of the world, there is little reason to think that this kind of design will not be part of our future. The way the FICO score is already embedded in our present. I will stop here and let you meditate on this. Thank you very much.


So 2008 was the very first WordCamp event, and it's my massive record 10 years ago. This was prior to the idea of WordCamps being something that everyone could organize was real. So it was called WordPress Vancouver. It was organized by Tazu and Ms. 604, who's still a relatively well-known person in Vancouver, I think. If you've ever searched for things to do in Vancouver this weekend, guarantee you've seen Rebecca's content. This event happened at the network hub, which is on Richards. The network hub has been a huge supporter of the WordPress community since way before 2008, but definitely at 2008. And it was a group of people just like you who really cared about WordPress, this new upstart thing that a couple of people were working on and wanted to figure out how to use it for their own business or for just publishing content on the web in general. Some notable people were there. This is Rebecca Baldwin, Ms. 604, who was then considered Vancouver's most important blogger and is still considered Vancouver's most important blogger. The other one person there is John Chow, who at the time was trying to figure out if he could earn enough money with his blog to not have a job. I don't know how much money John Chow earns now, but he has every version of the Tesla and lives in California. And I think he earns more money than he did back then. If you go to johnchow.com, you'll see what I'm talking about. So this event was a true camp. There was a chair for the computer and a projector on another chair. Everyone was sitting on the floor. Mobile demos were done on mobile devices. This, by the way, is Dwayne's story from Vancouver. He created the WP mobile. It was the plug-in everyone was using to get their sites to become mobile before responsive web design was a thing, because as you know, responsive web design was invented in 2010. So WordPress, and Dwayne in particular, was well ahead of that. Dwayne just released a new plug-in, an SEO plug-in, this week that he wants everyone to test out, just so you know.  So this is what it looked like. There were lots of interesting people there. There was lots of interesting people there.  That, by the way, is Raul. He was a prolific blogger in the WordPress community. He now lives somewhere in South or Central America and does very important research on water. He's also become like a notebook fanatic and talks a lot about this everything notebook thing that you should go follow him on the internet too. So the topics of the day at WordCamp, Vancouver, 2008, the joys of amateur blogging, how to make money using a WordPress blog, that was John Chow, blogging and social media, WordPress for total website development, good typography in WordPress, using WordPress to create a custom library catalog and WordPress and mobile blogging. It's fine because when you look at these things, you see that these are the things that are still relevant today, 10 years later. There also shows you how far we have come since 2008. We've come from a little weird meeting in two hours on the floor of the network hub to hundreds and hundreds of WordCamps worldwide every year. The WordPress of 2008 was an upstart blogging platform and if you told people you were working on WordPress, they would ask you, why are you not working with Drupal? And they would honestly laugh at you and say, you're not a real web developer. The WordPress of 2018 is 31.9% of the web. In American terms, that is a large portion of a football field and like a third of the Empire State building. To me, WordPress is the idea of the web made real. Tim Berners-Lee created the web with a very specific purpose and that was to make it possible for anyone to publish content at the time of scientific research but eventually all content onto the web in such a way that any other person with a connection to the internet could pull that content down and consume it in whatever way they want. And WordPress is that stopgap between the technology and the human being in that conversation. WordPress is an interface. WordPress is what facilitates your idea getting into a database and someone else being able to access that idea from that database without really knowing much about how the web works and without needing to know much about how the web works. And WordPress has actually built the web. It's hard to understand unless you've followed the last 10 years but WordPress is in fact the thing that has built the web. The idea of WordPress is huge. This concept of democratizing publishing letting every single person in the world install a simple package onto a server. Write, take photos, make videos, put them onto the internet and then any other person in the world gaining access to it. All without having to pay to use that package and then being able to contribute back to that project and make it better. That's revolutionary. Back in 2008 that was considered a weird quirk, the biggest blogging engines were ones you paid for and they were the ones that were considered the only viable options. Today all the competitors to WordPress are desperately trying to figure out how to get people to pay money for something WordPress does better for free. The reason why I can tell you about WordCamp and Coover 2008 is because of WordPress. Because all the people that were there they blogged about it on their WordPress sites and because they own their own content and published it on their own sites, it's still there. If you go to the Ms604's website and search for WordCamp and Coover 2008 you will find her live blog with all the pictures and everything and all the links and you'll realize why it's so important that we own our own content because she also did a video live blog that she published on Vidler at the time one of the biggest video platforms. I'm sure you all have accounts, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. But if you go to Vidler today you get this, page not found 404. The content ceases to exist because the platform died. That doesn't happen with WordPress because we own our own content. We are at what philosophers call a demarcation line for WordPress right now. There was WordPress before the classic version and in a couple of months there will be WordPress next, the post-Gudenberg version. Gutenberg is this grand idea that completely re-things publishing for the web from the ground up, thinking about every single element as its own item with properties and abilities. And it's something that will revolutionize not just WordPress and not just WordPress competitors but the web in general. But in the 10 years since WordPress became something important on the web one very important aspect of the idea of the web has gotten lost and this is not a problem with WordPress. This is a problem with the web in general. We have lost our way in that we have simply forgotten the core premise of the web which is accessibility. Accessibility is the job. If we don't make accessible content for the web we are not doing the job. The web was built to be accessible. Without accessibility the job is not done. Unfortunately right now Gutenberg looks to be released without being accessible. I'm sure the organizers here hope that I'd be like, yeah, come on, let's do this. But seriously, this is not something that can happen. A work is being done to make sure Gutenberg will be accessible but the runway from today until November 19th when it's supposed to be released is simply too short. And we cannot let this happen because accessibility has always been considered a bolt-on but it's not. It's the core element of the web. Without accessibility the web has no purpose. The entire idea of the web is that we should be able to publish content and anyone should be able to access that content in any way they choose. That means accessibility must be in place. Accessibility is the job. That's why we have it enshrined in our coding standards. The coding standards explicitly say we cannot ship WordPress without it being accessible. That's why every one of you and every person who is in any way associated with WordPress needs to put accessibility as the top requirement for every project that is done because WordPress is 31.9% of the web. WordPress is so big now that decisions we make impact the web in general. If we do something you can actually see the web trends shifting because of it. And we no longer just have the responsibility of dealing with our own users. WordPress now is responsible for the web. We have a leadership role and we need to take that leadership role seriously. And it starts by saying from now accessibility is the primary concern of all web work. We have a responsibility and an opportunity to be the leaders the web need. Now there are three challenges facing the web and WordPress right now. Accessibility, privacy and security, well that's three, but sure. Those three go hand in hand because those are the three key tendons of the web. Everything has to be accessible. The privacy of the user has to be preserved and all data has to be secure. This is the place we can lead. WordPress has a crisis of leadership because some of these things are being left behind to chase a goal of better interfaces and everything else. That cannot stand. We can do better, we can lead here. And finally, we are facing the very real possibility of the closing of the open web through government control, corporate control and everything else. And WordPress is in a unique position to make sure that doesn't happen because we are 31.9% of the web and growing. These are actually opportunities for us. Accessibility, privacy and security is something we can do. There are people in this room right now who actually know accessibility, who actually know privacy and actually know security and know how to make sure the WordPress actually not just sets the bar, but raises the bar on all these efforts and every one of you can do this. Leadership, we don't just need to talk about leadership within the community. We need to take leadership in the wider web community and say WordPress leads the charge and making the web better for everyone. And every single one of you can help do that. Every single one of you has the opportunity to step up and be that leadership. We can reclaim the open web before it gets destroyed by all the people because we are 31.9%. WordPress is the community you see here right now. It's not simply software. It is all of us together doing something revolutionary. WordPress is diversity. Look around you. Normal tech conferences have mainly men, mainly white people like me. Go to a WordPress conference. There's usually more women than men. There's a large variance of people in race, color, creed, disabilities, everything else. WordPress is a fantastically diverse community. WordPress is open at its core. Really, Christine? WordPress is open. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can use it. Anyone can contribute in any way they want to. It's not just about writing code. It's about coming to this event. It's about talking to other people. It's about sharing your ideas, helping someone else. All of this is community work. And it's possible because WordPress is open. And most importantly, WordPress is you.  How many of you are here for the first time? You've never gone to a WordCamp before. These are the most important people in the room. These are the future of WordPress. I welcome you from the bottom of my heart. Thank you very much.