Well, I should urge you all to take your seats. I should congratulate you for getting to this session after what for many of us has been a lot of late nights, a lot of chatting, a lot of networking, and probably too much drinking. So well done for being here on this beautiful morning. And I should start with a confession, which is that this has been a session that I've been looking forward to most all week, which might sound surprising because those of you know me, my name's Julian Tett, I'm chair of the editorial board for the Financial Times in the US. You may know me if you do know me as a financial journalist because that's what I spend most of my career doing. But there's two reasons why I'm so fascinated by this and I've been looking forward to this so much. Firstly, because as it happens, I have a PhD in cultural anthropology and I've spent much of my last few years as a sideline looking at the need to blend computing and social science. I actually wrote a book about this last year and I think there are some really interesting questions about what can or cannot be learned from other areas of technology where things have gone wrong in the past and applied to quantum computing. Secondly, I also believe that one of the joys of Davos, particularly the in-person version of Davos is that you can collide with the unexpected and learn about things you may not know. And right now, quantum computing is one of those areas where, frankly, most of us who are not scientists need to collide with this and embrace our understanding of this because it could potentially be very important. I say could because the promise around quantum computing is remarkable. In some ways, the perils around it aren't terrifying as well. However, for most of us, it's very hard right now to work out what is hype, what is real, how it affects all of us in different fields, what people, and by people I mean ordinary non-scientists, executives and regulators could or should be doing this and how quickly it's actually gonna hit us all down the tracks. So we're gonna try and tease out some of these key questions. We have a terrific panel of essentially two scientists turn as entrepreneurs who are at the forefront of this revolution and trying to take this bold idea and turn it into a tangible, not just product, but business plan and raise money from investors. Some of you in the room might be indeed the money bags about to jump in in this field. And we also have a regulator who's trying to oversee how this develops. The regulator is Reiki Haiman, who's co-founder and director of ecosystem development Quantum Delta in Netherlands, which probably doesn't mean anything to you, but the Netherlands has been at the forefront of attempts to create an innovative regulatory structure around this. We have Jack Hidory, who's at the far, my far left, your right, who's chief executive officer of Sandbox, AQUSA, which is basically trying to take the ideas of Quantum and apply them to some real world uses even now in a form of Quantum. He'll tell us what that means in a moment, previously a neuroscientist and physicist. And Jeremy O'Brien, who is previously a physics professor, who's created the company Psi Quantum in Silicon Valley, which is also at the forefront of those trying to turn this idea into a tangible, practical plan. But I'd like to start with you, Jeremy. You were a physics professor for many years. I'd like to imagine that you are addressing a room full of English literature students who know nothing about this and give us a three-minute explanation of what on Earth Quantum computing is and why on Earth anyone here should actually care about it. Sure, so I think the reason that you should care about it is because I believe, as do many others, that Quantum computing is destined to be the most profoundly world-changing technology that humans have yet uncovered. So for that reason, I think you should definitely pay attention. It's going to transform, you know, our live society and economy in incredibly profound ways. And the reason for that is because it takes problems that are otherwise forever impossible and makes them possible. And those problems span pretty much every industry that we have today. And that's a pretty well unprecedented dynamic that you can expect to happen there because if you're taking problems of extremely high value that have been impossible to solve and will be forever impossible to solve until we have Quantum computing, then you're going to have a profound disruption in a majority of industries and that will affect our planet. And I would contend in predominantly positive ways. So you mentioned in your introduction the prospect for different applications. And I think in climate, in healthcare and in energy, we stand as humanity to benefit massively from this technology. Right, well, I'm going to come back and talk about the use cases in more detail and the risks as well. But I mean, even by the standards of, you know, the KBDP Silicon Valley hype, saying that you think this is going to be the most profound technological shift for many decades is remarkable. Do you think this is potentially even more significant than the launch of artificial intelligence? Yes, I do. And as you said, you know, I've been in this business for a long time, 25 years ago, 27 years ago, I read about the prospect for Quantum computing to bring about a revolution comparable to agricultural, industrial, digital revolutions. And I think that is really true. And I can explain a little bit why I believe that and why plenty of others believe that. Okay, give us your elevator pitch, which you probably practiced with a whole bunch of venture capitalists a thousand times already. If not your own mother. Yeah, well... Okay, and you've got like two minutes. Well, I'll pick just one application and that's chemistry. And my conviction is that we can't do chemistry until we have a quantum computer. Now that's deliberately provocative and it's also deliberately true in the sense that if you cannot simulate the building blocks of the world that you find around you or the world that you wanna build as we cannot with chemistry, then what are you really doing? It's the equivalent of trying to do advanced engineering and technology without the aid of a conventional computer. And if you need some proof that we are at an extremely primitive stage with chemistry, you just need to look at the natural world around you life over billions of years that's used exactly the same tool set that we have. They got the same chemistry set that we got and over billions of years has evolved to be able to perform miracles, like turning sunlight into energy, turning water and nitrogen into ammonia to fertilize plants, reproduction and so on. And the task for us is extremely challenging on a conventional computer because the problem grows exponentially. So large instances of chemistry are forever beyond reach of any conventional computer that we can ever build. Okay, chemistry, it's a subject from school. It underpins everything that humans do, everything whether it's a molecule in our body, it's a material that we wanna deploy to tackle climate change or healthcare. You name it, we need that chemical explanation. I believe that we're gonna look back on our pre-quantum computing world and wonder how on earth did we survive, nevermind sustain a population of near on 10 billion people with those primitive caveman tools that we were using back then. Okay, so our iPhones are primitive caveman tools. Try telling my teens that. But I'd like to turn to Jack. I mean, one of the things everyone says, this sounds extraordinary and amazing. You're taking in the idea of quantum physics and applying to computing. You're gonna get superpowers with computing. It all sounds very, very star trek. And it's probably like five, 10 years away. But you say that you're already deploying some version of this right now. Can you tell us what you're actually doing? Again, if you can keep it to two or three minutes and make it intelligible for the non-scientist, you get a brownie point. Sure. Usually when we talk about quantum, we have champagne or wine in the room because it's much easier when people have been drinking to talk about quantum. I thought Silicon Valley had psychedelics. We'll do our best, we'll do our best, we'll do our best here. The first thing to say is that, building what Jeremy said, is that beyond just quantum computing, there's other quantum technologies that are here and now that we also need to bring into this conversation. So we think about quantum. Quantum computing is a core bedrock, but we also have, for example, quantum sensing. And in quantum sensing, we can build diamonds, diamonds that instead of just being made a pure carbon, we dope in some nitrogen. We make them slightly different. We grow them from scratch in a facility. These are not from the ground. And we can use these diamonds as very sensitive magnetometers. And what can we do with these? We can actually detect, for example, the very faint magnetic signal of your heart. Everyone here, I'm sure, has had an ECG, electrocardiography, but now we can do MCG, magnetocardiography. And one of the reasons why cardiovascular disease continues to be one of the top killers in the world, here in Europe, in the US, around the world, is that we don't have good enough diagnostic devices. But going into the magnetic realm, using quantum diamonds, using quantum sensing, we can now start to do that. Another application that we can do again in the near term is navigation around the world without GPS. Right now, Russia is blocking and jamming the signal of GPS over Ukraine to frustrate the Ukrainians. But using the orthopedic magnetic field, we can actually navigate. Birds do that. Whales do that. We, humans, can now do that. So quantum sensors are, we have a device right now in clinical trials so we can do these things in the very near term. We don't need millions and millions of qubits. When it comes to quantum computing, it's a critical, fundamental technology. We are the first generation of humans that will not only have wonderful activity in the bits world, but also now in the world of atoms. And just building on what Jeremy said, it's critical to not just the chemistry also of the body, but also, for example, material science for clean tech. If we want to have better batteries for electric vehicles, better batteries to store renewable energy, we need to simulate these kinds of molecules and atoms in using the quantum equations. And this is why this is a fundamental shift in how we do computing. So just to give a sense for the audience, are you actually using it right now in products? Can you pull out of your pocket or out of your computer or cyberspace a product and say, here we are, this is being used with quantum computing and quantum principles? Because I think many people are confused about this. Sure. I know that Jeremy is talking about sort of, you know, products and ideas that are probably some time away yet. But you know, is there anything tangible right now? Yeah, with quantum sensing, we have built devices now here now. They're in the hospital right now in clinical trials. So quantum sensors are very near term. We don't need millions of qubits. We don't need error correction. We can build those today. And one hope of this panel is to broaden the conversation about quantum from just quantum computing, fundamental, but also now include many other quantum technologies.  MRIs were built by physicists using quantum principles. That's a previous generation quantum sensor. Very large, cryogenic, has to be cooled down to minus 200 and colder. But now we can have room temperature quantum sensors. So this is very much Jillian in the next few years, very much here now. We have built these devices. They're in hospitals, in clinical trial. It's things that we will use and will impact all of our lives in the very, very near term. Before I turn to Freika, I just want to quickly ask Jeremy, you know, when do you imagine your products, your very bold promises are actually going to materialize? I mean, you're talking about them all sort of pure, almost higher version of this, aren't you? Yeah, well, maybe I can clarify. I'd like to narrow the discussion, of course. Jack would like to broaden the discussion. But yeah, we have quantum technologies of which, you know, quantum computing, I think is the holy grail. And then we also have quantum sensing and quantum communication, as Jack is describing. And I would go further than the MRI and describe a fridge magnet as a quantum technology if I was pressed. So I don't want to talk about, you know, I want us to talk about, but per your question, I'd like to just focus on quantum computing, which is distinct, but Jack is absolutely correct.  Quantum computing requires, as far as anyone knows, that million qubit regime that Jack has alluded to. And that's extremely challenging, as you can imagine. So it's not right here right now? It is not here right now. Today the world of quantum computing has around 100 qubits. Right. And there has been a lot of hope over the last five or six years that people could find something useful to do with around 100 to 1,000 qubits. That has not so far panned out. It looks unlikely that it will pan out. And that's the source of a lot of confusion out there in the world, is that many people are of the belief that we have it now or that it's tomorrow because we have 100 qubits and with 100 qubits we could be able to do something useful. So far not. The million qubit regime, it's been my personal conviction for more than 20 years that we will need to leverage the semiconductor industry in the 50 years and trillion dollars that went into that industry in order to deliver that technology. And that's what we are doing. And that's why I believe that we're in a regime where well within this decade we're gonna be deploying this technology. Okay, so we already have versions of this that are not computing in the real world that Jack is developing in medicine and things like that. But the computing version, which is the one that everyone gets excited or terrified by is within the decade. So that's quite close by world economic foreign standards. Can I, before I turn to Frieke, very quickly I wanna ask a question that most people ask up front in relation to quantum computing. And it's often the only reason people have heard about this is that if we get these quantum computers within the next decade, will that smash apart the entire current system of encryption in the current world? That's what everyone really wants to know right now. And will the whole promise behind Bitcoin and DeFi collapse as a result? You each have a minute to answer that. Now I'm gonna get Frieke. So I'll give you bad news and good news. The bad news is, yes, quantum computers break the RSA and ECC encryption standards that we all use today. So RSA has had a good run. 1978 till today, 40 plus years, pretty good run for a tech standard. I think we'd all agree. But we now have to transition from RSA, the current standard to the post-RSA quantum safe. And here's the good news, Gilliam, I wanna share. Which is that the world bodies, the countries, about 40 countries, got together about six years ago, recognizing this issue, came together in an open process with academics, industry partners, and governments and said we've got to find a set of standards that are quantum safe. And this past January, just a few months ago, they completed the core of their work. That's why this panel today is so timely because just in three weeks from today, we'll get the first two of those standards coming out of these government bodies. These are the quantum safe protocols that are what we can use for e-commerce, for encryption, for re-encrypting all of the patient data that we have in hospitals, for re-encrypting all the intellectual property that we have, and also for starting to use in insecure communication as well. So bad news is, yes, we have to now discard RSA and all the stuff that we were using before, and particularly because of SNDL, store now, decrypt later. We have to move now, even though the quantum computers are not here yet, we have to move now because the adversaries are exfiltrating our information, even though it's encrypted, they're storing it on their servers to decrypt it in a few years when they have the computing capability. That's the urgency of why the governments of the world are issuing these standards today. Well, there's nothing like terror to force collaboration. Ha, ha, ha, ha. Freaker, how terrified are you? How much of a risk is the idea that basically all of our encryption devices that are working on our computers and phones, all of that's about to collapse? How much does that scare you? Well, I'm not scared because I think the positive applications of this new technology are way, way up against this risk. And I mean, yes, it's true. We have to get to the new standard of encryption, but it's like an upgrade. We can do that. We've done it before and the standards are there. We're getting prepared. We just need to do it. And we need to focus on the positive applications because it's amazing what this new technology can do for sensing, well, for health, everything that has been mentioned. And I think it's important to discuss this with the broader public because what we've seen is that a technology like this, and you see it also in your reaction, that it can scare people off, right? It's like, oh, and then people say, oh, Einstein thought it was spooky action at a distance, teleportation, and it has this sort of mythological feel around it. And I think we should get over that because this thing is also very complicated and we use it and there's lots of good to do with it. And yeah, we should overcome that. For instance, also, if you look at what happened with the pandemic and vaccines, a lot of people didn't want to take the vaccines whereas it was a great solution for the problem we had. And that's why we, at this point already, although quantum computing maybe years away before it really gets into the real world, we would already start discussions and engage also other people than just the physicists. Well, Alex Karp, the CEO of Palantir, made a very interesting remark in his IPO documents a couple of years ago, which I wrote about in my book at some length, which is basically society has effectively, when it comes to AI, outsourced the control of this technology to what he called a small group of technologists operating in a far-flung region that no one else pays attention to, i.e. Silicon Valley, not quite, but anyway.  It gives them enormous power. Do you have any confidence that you as a regulator can actually keep up with what those technical priests are doing and challenge them, oversee them and actually try and communicate to people about what's happening? Yeah, well I think this is exactly the point and I totally agree with that statement that is made and that's why we're here at the World Economic Forum, to get public and private partners together to work on this together. And I think with quantum computing, we're in time. With AI, we were too late. With all the social things, we were too late. Here we have a shot of doing that and that's why I think it's good news that government agencies, the European Commission, et cetera, already have an eye on this technology and that we broaden exactly what you say, the group of people working on it because how much I like Jeremy and Jack, there's also other things to think about. It's about ethics, it's about legal issues, it's about how to embrace society as a whole. And in the Netherlands, we have this initiative, the 600 million ecosystem initiative and 20 million out of that is aimed for a center for quantum and society where we discuss all these topics together and actually Jeremy and I are working together in this initiative climate that was announced this morning also to work on use cases for the climate. Right, I mean, Jeremy, I'm curious with you because you're doing this obviously as a business. Are you finding that investors are very excited about this idea and want to back it? Which idea, sorry? About the quantum computing idea and its applications to say climate change. Absolutely, yeah, I mean, so just on the topic, I've been working for 25 plus years on quantum computing and I'm doing that not because I think it's fun doing a startup and making a pile of money, I'm doing it because I think the world really needs this technology and needs it urgently and most urgently for climate, followed quickly by healthcare and energy. And sure, investors are, I think we humans and I hope everyone at this event is aware that we need to move trillions of dollars around the world to tackle this problem and we need to do it urgently starting yesterday and it's clear that quantum computing is the most powerful tool that you could hope to have in your toolkit when you're tackling climate change and I wanna be absolutely clear on this as well that I don't want anyone to walk out of this room or to listen to this online and get the impression that we can relax, quantum computing's gonna ride to our rescue and solve climate change. Absolutely not. You need to do everything in your power as an individual and in your organization to tackle this problem by any mechanism that you have starting yesterday and then in addition, we will build a quantum computer as quickly as possible and we will partner with you on applications like direct air capture, like green hydrogen, solar, electric batteries, potentially even green cement and so on. We'll partner with you on doing that but we humans need to band together and by the way, it should be a whole lot of fun, right? We're good at tackling grand challenges and working together to do that. That's why we're here actually as humans so we need to get on with that very quickly but in the process, is it lucrative? You bet it's lucrative, right? Like you're unlocking incredible value in that process and there's plenty to go around. It's not a zero sum game. You're creating new possibilities, entirely new markets and so investors to your question are absolutely all over this. Right, well the very fact we've got a packed room this morning on the last morning after the last night of parties indicates the interest in this. I'm gonna turn to the audience for questions in just one minute but I want to ask you very quickly, Jack, well, you tell me what you wanted to say but I also wanted to ask you very quickly if you run into an executive or a venture capitalist or any of your friends who are not scientists that say, or executives, what should I be doing now about this? Other than reading an article you wrote in Nature about 10 days ago, what does it actually mean in terms of practical people? Yeah, first just to pick up on the conversation just now it is very important that we work very closely with governments and regulators. Site Quantum, Sandbox, AQ, all the companies in the space we spend a lot of time right now with government officials. It's very important that we are briefing in terms of the latest technology, particularly right now in terms of this encryption issue, the SNDL, the transition from RSA to post-RSA. We did write the nature paper, I published 10 days ago on this and so we can share that as well but it's very critical we work and partly why we're here in Europe is not just to attend Davos but also to be spending time with the governments here. The other issue I would also kind of point out that all of us on this panel work on is the human capital issue which is absolutely critical. It's very important that we work with the universities. Fredeka has come from Delft. The Delft is one of the centers worldwide in quantum technology but the good news Julian about this technology as opposed to say AI, is that this is already starting as a global phenomenon. UNSW and other major universities in Australia, fantastic expertise. Delft, many universities here in Switzerland, ETH, EPFL, universities in the UK where Jeremy came out of Bristol, Imperial and others in the US and Canada as in other examples. It's a global phenomenon but the challenge is if you add up all the PhD output of all these universities we don't reach 5% of the demand that our companies and our governments need and so the investment that we need public-private partnership in this case because we're doing a part but we also need the government as a partner to invest in the next generation of engineers and scientists to help us make this revolution happen. Right, that's fascinating, by the way I should also say that Jack gave me a copy of his book, Quantum Computing and Applied Approach which I'm sure will make fabulous reading. It's a light read, it's a light read. It's a light home with a gin and tonic, so here we go. Before I ask you, I want to quickly want to ask you the audience to quickly vote by show of hands on a couple of things. How many of you in the room think you actually understand what quantum computing means? Okay, a few. How many of you are scared of it? Okay, how many of you are excited by it? Wow, okay, so that was a very optimistic response. Otherwise, you either just woke up recently because of that question. But anyway, let me turn to the audience for questions. So I do want to create lots of space for questions. Wave your hand at me if you want to ask a question. And I think there should be some microphones. Well, that's coming to me. Right here in the front. Perhaps I can address your question of what should be done now and I think the answer is engage. Engage, right. Well, that's what we're doing. Okay, and by the way, it would as always be courteous but not compulsory to identify yourself briefly and keep it brief as well, please, for questions. Hi, I'm Martin O'Neill from the University of York in the UK. So let me just ask about risks and sort of concerns that you might have. We're obviously in a very difficult geopolitical situation at the moment. How worried are you about what states might do in terms of developing military applications related to quantum computing? How much of a threat is there about kind of military uses that might be very, very dangerous? And what are your biggest fears for those of you who are a great enthusiast about quantum computing or other kinds of quantum tech? What's the largest worries that you have as experts about the development of this technology? Yeah, I'll give you a glimmer answer to that which is that my greatest fear is that- You might want to put your mic a bit closer, yeah. Can you hear me all right? Yeah. My greatest fear is that we get distracted by the risks overly, like we need to take these risks into account, but this is a technology that enables us to, you know, to do wonderful things predominantly, powerful and wonderful things. And I think we've learned some lessons from conventional computing, from the internet, you know, laser, GPS, et cetera. But this is the opposite of a weapon if you see what I mean as a technology. And because, as panelists and Gillian have said, there's this sort of, you know, mystical nature to the technology, I think there's a risk of overdoing it. Jack has already addressed, and I agree completely with him and Frieker, that, you know, we need to address this challenge of decryption, you know, the quantum computing's capacity to decrypt things. This has been known, Jack, said, for six years. Governments have been, you know, the US government gave a directive more than six years ago to move to this so-called post-quantum cryptography, which is just a cryptography that is robust to quantum computing's ability to crack it. That's the number one thing that we need to worry about. And then, you know, more widely, of course, if this is a very powerful technology, the prospects for, you know, geopolitical disruption are profound.  Can I ask what you asked on this point very quickly, and I'm going to ask the question at the front from the lady here. Could this smash apart the crypto world, the Bitcoin world? Well, we just had a panel on that this morning, and what's interesting about blockchain, blockchain, I think, has a lot of potential. There's a lot of value we can build on top of blockchain. Unfortunately, the folks who started blockchain picked two particular encryption standards. Blockchain needs public key encryption. That's what it needs, signatures and encryption to make it work. They chose RSA and ECC, the two encryption standards that quantum breaks. So, the good news is, again, that we now have post-quantum crypto protocols. We can take a measured transition over the next four or five years for blockchain, and we have to work with the blockchain community. Part of what happened here in Davos this week is that the Web3 blockchain community and those of us in the quantum community started to meet, and we're meeting because we need an orderly transition of the underlying building blocks of blockchain itself. We need to move blockchain from RSA, ECC, lots of acronyms, sorry about that, but these are just acronyms that mean the current encryption standard. We need to move it to the quantum safe encryption standards. We have about four or five years to make that happen. We have the time, we have a plan, but we really need the participation, Jillian, of the blockchain community to do that. And we already saw how difficult it is to move from proof of work to proof of stake, which is a critical change to bring down the carbon footprint of blockchain. We now need to restore the pillars and fundamentals of the security of the blockchain by moving it to the post-quantum protocols. Well, as an anthropologist, I would say that the culture dynamic of the blockchain tribe is not exactly famous for complying with organizational requirements and working with regulators, so Frika. Yeah, I would like to go back to Martin a bit. So indeed it's not like nuclear fusion or whatever with that kind of horrific applications. It is more in the realm of classical computing, like high performance computing also very powerful tool and governments are looking at this. So it's not like the Netherlands is putting 600 million, Germany, the US, China. So there's a lot of interest from governments and also working together. Like two weeks ago, we had a meeting in Washington, DC with 12 nations to work together on this as well. So it's on top of the list, but it's not... I mean, it's a new technology. It's coming. We should regulate it. We should govern it. And the only way to do it is to engage and not to be scared. Well, if the governments end up saving the encryption of Bitcoin, that will be ironic indeed. We have a question at the front. I think my question was already answered. It was China. What about China in all these measures? Well, I don't think that question has been answered. Are we scared, those of us who are non-Chinese, that the Chinese may either be ahead of America and other countries? You know, who's actually leaving us? Are the Chinese ahead? And does that create threats for countries that are not China? And of course the argument could be put the other way around as well in terms of countries which are non-American may not welcome America leading on this point. Well, it's a broad technology, as Jack was saying. So it's computing, but there's all kinds of things, sensing, communications, and different kind of technology platforms. And China is a very strong and active player in that field. Also a large national investor. So we should not say, oh, the Western world is ahead or something. So I don't like to use the word race, but everybody is working on this, and we should do our utmost best to bring this to market. Jack and Jeremy, I'd like to ask you about this specifically. Is China ahead of America in this or not? China's focus in a particular area that we in the West are not as focused on, which is quantum coherent communications. They put a lot of it. Panjhan Wei, who leads almost like a Manhattan project, essentially, in China focused on this area. Brilliant physicist, by the way, focused on creating both a terrestrial and satellite based communications network that can carry these kinds of quantum states. The states of superposition, the states of entanglement, Freike mentioned, the spooky action of distance entanglement that Einstein was so obsessed with. This quantum coherent network that China is focused on, it's very much an area that China is more intent on than I would say most of the countries in the West. So I would say that there's a lot of depth of expertise that China has gathered around this. They're spending about 10 to 15 billion U.S. dollars over the next three years on building out this initially national network. They have a satellite in space already called MISIAS, and they intend to go global, according to their own documents, with this communications network. Right, how much is the U.S. spending a lot of interest by comparison? And then I want to ask Jeremy the question. Or maybe you can answer this, Jeremy. Well, right now the U.S. has a public budget of about one to two billion, but as we were all saying before, there's a lot of private investment. In fact, in the past two years, 3.5 billion dollars of investment has happened just in the U.S. alone into quantum companies, companies like CyQuantum and our company and many others. And so that's a good piece of news. We need that investment to get this innovation going. Although again, the human capital, not the financial capital is a rate-limiting factor here. Right, one thing to add on the communication because yes, China is doing a lot, but we are also Europe has this Euro QCI initiative. It's like a three billion initiative to build a European quantum communication infrastructure. And just yesterday, there was a New York Times article of a Delft group having teleportation in three nodes, which is quite amazing actually. Right. Jeremy, is China ahead or behind in the areas that you're looking at? So Freaker and Jack have talked about communication, so quantum communication. And again, in the effort to disambiguate a little bit here, that's a separate quantum technology to quantum computing. And no, China is not ahead in quantum computing, but as you've heard, they're investing heavily and there's a huge activity there. Right, we have a question in the back and then we'll come over here. I think that's a great conversation on China, but I have a number here that says that 18 governments have invested about 25 billion in quantum computing till late last year. I'm sure the number is growing at quantum speed. But the fact is that the relationship between the investment in quantum by governments versus the private sector is going to be a very interesting dynamic.  And Angelien, to sort of add the dimension to your question, when you say China is ahead, it means the government of China is ahead in computing. When you say US is ahead, it's usually the private sector which is ahead. Even in India, from where I am, there's a lot of investment going on. But the question of investment from the government versus the private sector is a dynamic I'd like to explore with all of you. Right. You know what, I'm actually gonna take, I see several other people wanting to ask questions. So I'm gonna take two or three questions, group them together, and then let people address them at the end. So I think we've got a question there and a question over here. Yes, yeah, I could have many questions. I'm Carlos Torres, I'm the chair of BVDA, a bank based in Spain with global operations. So forget blockchain. What about other infrastructures that might be decrypted like banks, exchanges, or places where other assets are kept? And then when you say human capital, is that for the hardware, the software, and whether the different companies that are developing the hardware, the IBMs, Google, Samsung, whether their version of computing is gonna be interoperable with the others or not. And then when you say it's lucrative, you mean in the very long term, if there is no commercial application now, I gather. Thank you. Okay, there's a question over here, and then I throw, are there any more questions on this side? Yeah, one. Any women want to ask questions, by the way? I mean, I know this is not a field where there's tremendous diversity, so I'm gonna have this question and that question, and then we'll go to the... Thanks very much, Julian. My name's John Diel, and I'm chairman of Unipart Group. Thanks for a brilliant session. This may be a silly question, but when might the applications necessary to run on quantum computers be available to the wider community? When can we all buy one? Keep it in our pockets, okay? Well, that's good, yeah. Hi, sorry, I'm Luisa Gomez-Bravo from PVA as well. My question is more on the emerging market side. So in the past, obviously, as technologies get developed, it tends to create a divide, favoring developed economies, and then it's the emerging economies that come later. So there's a wealth distribution effect. Do you think that's gonna happen now? Again, with quantum computing and quantum technologies, or can we do it in a different way? Well, that's another great question. Frieke, why don't you address the last one? So I know you're very concerned about unequal access, and try and keep each answered pretty brief. Yeah, very concerned. I don't think quantum computing is fundamentally different than AI, so it goes for all the technologies and we should work on that. So there's no answer, there's no solution, no easy solution, but we need to work on that together. Right. Yeah, just to tackle a few of these. First, I think it's one of the wonderful things about quantum is that it's born cloud native. If you look at the past 40 years of computing hardware, it was on premises. You had to buy these large machines, install them in your facility, and then amortize that use over, say, seven, eight years, and then go to the next generation, and that's the history of IBM 360, DeX, Sun, SGI, Dell, Lenovo, so on and so forth. This being cloud native is a really big advantage because we want it meshed together. We want CPU, GPU, and QPU, Quantum Processing Unit. We want them all interacting with each other. These specialized chemistry applications, for example, on Quantum, that's what you run on Quantum, and then interacting with CPU and GPU, so all that is cloud based. So the good news is that right now already, academic students, corporations can get access to very, very primitive quantum computers, but that portends well for the future in terms of access when we get scaled fault tolerant quantum computers. To answer the gentleman from BBVA and the questions from BBVA, absolutely correct. This is not just a blockchain issue. This is fundamental to the entire financial banking system. This is not only data in motion, i.e. payments, transactions, as they're moving through the SWIFT system, through other systems that we have around the world, it's also the data at rest. Under the compliance regimes around the world, banks and others are required to keep the records of their customers for 10 to 20 years. This is why we must move the encryption. We have to re-encrypt all that information into the new standards because of SNDO, because of the Steel Now Decrypt Later attack that is underway right now. So it's fundamental both for the data that we have at banks today, at pharma, at governments, at telcos, and also fundamental to the data in motion in terms of the payments that are moving across our financial networks. Jeremy, do you wanna tell us when we can actually get one of these in our pocket? And also, I'm really curious about this question about the differing models of development between the Chinese state-driven public sector model, if you like, and the American Silicon Valley model, where it wasn't the case in the past where things like NASA ran space, but now we have Elon Musk, and now we have much of the innovation coming out of the private sector. Is that good or bad? It's a bit like asking Turkey not to vote for Christmas, but you know, since you're working for a sector. But tell us how you see the development because you were previously working at a university funded by public money. Indeed. So I'll start with the access. So as Jack highlights, it's cloud native and that bodes well in the sense that, and I'd go even further to say that actually what the world needs is the applications of quantum computing. So for example, that catalyst for direct air capture, for example, gets deployed. It doesn't really matter to the majority of the world how that was developed on a quantum computer, what matters is the applications thereafter, whether that's in climate or healthcare and so on. And to this point of ensuring that the world benefits and that we don't end up with further divides, this is indeed why Freyker and my organizations have partnered on this climate with a queue initiative where we're devoting some of that capacity, a large fraction of that capacity for climate related applications ahead of it becoming available. To the point of public versus private money, we absolutely need to do both. I mean, I hope I'm preaching to the converted when I say that climate and healthcare are big issues, right? Like these are not issues that... I'm a grey person, you know, I don't really believe in black or white as answers to many complex questions and there's no more complex question than climate I would say. And we're gonna need to have everyone doing everything and I think delivering the quantum computer to enable that should absolutely be a joint public-private enterprise. Right, right, well, thank you. Well, it's been a fascinating session. Sadly, we are almost out of time. I must, as I said earlier, one of the joys of Davos is colliding with the unexpected. Colliding with the unexpected in the world of quantum physics has a particularly spooky sense about it. But, you know, I think away sort of three key points. One is that this is indeed a fascinating and very important technology and the fact is not here yet does give us all a chance to get it slightly right or at least do better than we've done with so many of the other technologies in the past and we can learn from history and learn from the development of AI and other areas of innovation. Secondly, I am not quite as optimistic necessarily as you three about the ability of governments to get it right and to work with the private sector and with each other in an intelligent way. I think the implications for the financial sector, which is where I have spent much of my career reporting, are particularly challenging and striking and I don't think most investors have understood this yet at all, least of all in the relation to crypto assets and many other areas of traditional finance. And thirdly, leading out of this, I think my other big conclusion is that we in the media need to do a much better job of getting our heads around it and trying to explain it to the wider world. It's never easy because of this problem, as I said earlier, of financial Latin, technological Latin or all these other areas where a tiny group of geeks control technology which has the ability to affect us all but almost nobody else understands. Almost every crisis in the world in recent years has emerged because of this, whether it's a financial crisis or whether it's COVID, et cetera, et cetera. So there's a tremendous need for translation. I'm certainly committed to trying to do that the best I can. I'm gonna be reading this book on the way back. And I'll just ask on the behalf of journalists everywhere for as many of you who are involved in this field to help us to try to do slightly better than the past. It's a low bar, but we need together to try to do better to get more understanding and scrutiny of what's going on. So thank you all very much indeed for helping us on that. Thank you.


Good morning and welcome back to the second session and in this session We're going to study on first and second Peter. We're going to study on first and second Peter. So We all know the author of this letter. Who's the author of this letter? Yes, of course, it's Apostle Peter. So yeah, I just displayed this image He was married Apostle Peter was married He had his younger brother Andrew and he was one among the twelve disciples of Jesus He seemed to be a prominent figure or the spokesperson. He was a very prominent Leader so other than that, what do we know about Peter? Class feel free to share so that we keep the session interactive and it would be interesting to us What do we know about Peter? Anything that you know, you have studied in the Gospels in the four Gospels. We did study about Peter, isn't it? He was a very prominent figure prominent leader as well I've just taken all these pictures from the reason chosen series to keep our class interesting and interactive Well Peter was the author of this letter first and second Peter and This book is also the first Peter is known as the book of suffering and glory first Peter is also known as the book of suffering and glory The name Peter is reference 210 times 210 times in the New Testament More than any other single figure other than Jesus Christ So Peter is referred in the New Testament by three different names Can anyone guess what are the three different names that Peter carried or has? Anyone from the class can unmute and share One is Simon Can you hear me? Yes. Yes one is Simon and the other see first which Jesus changed and said you are see first, right? And then I Called you see this something else. Is that it? I don't know That's what came to mind immediately Simon and see Thank you. Thank you Nina. You're right first was Simon Simon was the name given by his parents Which means the lead The second as Nina said see first see first was an aramic name given to him by Jesus which means rock or a stone The third is Peter Peter is the Greek Equivalent of the Aramic name see first again, which means rock pebble or a small stone So Jesus makes a play on his name when he talks about building his church Building this church when we Can I request you all to turn to Matthew chapter 16 verse 16 to 18 Matthew? Matthew chapter 16 verse 16 to 18 if you have taken you can read Anyone have taken Matthew 16 16 to 18 Matthew chapter 16 verse 16 to 18 Simon Peter answered you are the Messiah the sound the living God Good for you, Simon son of John Jesus answered Jesus for this true did not come to you from any human being But is given to you directly by my father in heaven and so I tell you Peter You are a rock and on this rock foundation I will build my church and not even death will ever be able to overcome it Man thank you So you see how Jesus in the same verse he addresses him as Simon and as Peter and then he says You are rock and upon this rock. I will build the church I'll build my church and the gates of AIDS shall not prevail against it We also see when we read When we read the gospel is okay, Matthew, Mark Luke and John We see that Peter was a prominent figure among the disciples Let me see if I have he was it was a prominent figure among the disciples So can we list out some of the remarkable events of Peter that you recollect when we had studied the Gospels any of the events that you remember I'm sure all of us know just that you need to Unmute and share What you remember the remarkable events of Peter ma'am One event I remember is when Jesus was washing the disciples feet Peter Peter began to question as to why Jesus was washing the feet And he didn't want Jesus to do that and then when Jesus and Jesus said that it is important that you know I have to wash your feet and he told the reason immediately Peter was very Immediately Peter said that please not really wash my feet but wash my whole body He's always been He's always been on the extreme side I Yes, yes Another thing that he did was he walked on water even if it was a short time Yes, when he kept his eyes fixed on Jesus he walked Then we looked at the winds in the waves of course then he sank So that's one thing which he did which all the others didn't do they all sat in the boat But he said when he said in which can I come and he went and he did that for a short while Then of course he was part of the transfiguration Wow called for yeah The three of them were always called for special I mean the Lord took them whether it was to raise up even Jerry's daughter or Think like that a couple of things that kind of in a inner circle that he was part of Then of course he denied the Lord also not a very good thing, but he was known for that Thank you. Thank you Nina. There were many instances that you have shared. Thank you so much others in the class so one thing that I would like to share was when Jesus reinstuted Peter.  Thank you. Thank you, Jack and for sharing Anyone else who would like to add Okay, you've made my class easy. Thank you so much. Yeah, most of the points have been shared by all three Yes, so to start up with Let me change the slide Okay Let's try this again So he was born in a town of betside on the sea of Galilee as per the The gospel john and we also see that he was a son of a man by the name Johnna and he was a fisherman by trade and his brother was named andro So, uh, the uh through the gospels we learned that We learned that andro and peter were both the disciples of john the baptist And after the advice of john the baptist, they started to follow Jesus So and uh, when they had an encounter with Jesus at the seashore, this is the picture that I've Put across here Okay So this is the time period where the whole night peter and andro are toiled in fishing They were not very successful in catching But then jesus comes here Jesus comes and they have an encounter and they are able to catch the fish though the whole night they're toiled But now at the very word of jesus peter's able to catch the fish and then after the catch jesus Follow me Follow me. We read that in uh, uh, matthew chapter 4 verse 18 to 19 We see that jesus walking by the sea of galilee Saw two brothers Simon hauled peter and andro is brother Casting a net into the sea For they were the fishermen Then he said to them Follow me and I will make you the fishers of men And they immediately left their nets and followed him. Look at the response Now what made peter to follow jesus? the miracle Because he knew the whole night he toiled it did not find any fish But in the very word of the teacher the very word of the master He cast the net not even in the deep sea You know just little further from the shore But then he were he was able to get the fish that was nothing but a miracle and here He also recollects that The word of john the factors the minute g got prepared his heart the minute jesus called him Follow me. He left the net and followed jesus earnestly Later in the gospel of luke six We also see that he was one among the 12 parcels of the lamb and And among all the 12 he considered to be as jackson was sharing that he was Very active in nature. He seemed to be the spokesperson among the group Even though occasionally he got them into trouble And yes as nina said he was one among the three in the inner circle always peter james and john were present with jesus in the many instances and We also see when When jesus as john was sharing when jesus wanted to wash the feet of all the disciples Of which peter was not ready to give his But when jesus explained it, he said, okay, why just the feet you give me a complete part We also see that, um, you know, he always tried to protect jesus from arresting by the soldiers of the garden of gethsemane and his um aggressive in nature also made him to take the sword and cut the soldiers here of which jesus fixed it back We also see that after the arrest of jesus during the drive time how peter Denied jesus three times in fact He was the one who said jesus that he will not deny him is ready to give his life But he seemed to be the first one as jesus Told him even before the cock grows you will deny me three times and that was exactly what peter did Also in the gospel of luke and john We see that he was the first disciple to go to the empty tomb of jesus And he was also as jackson was sharing after the ascension of Jesus after jesus been the rise we read in john chapter 21 verse 15 to 19 we see that he was commissioned by jesus to take care of the flock By saying how much do you love me three times and he literally Humbles himself throws himself and do the feet of jesus and he says lord you know me It's not that I have to explain it to you how much I love you But you know me and then jesus this is what he says Tend to my sheep take care of my sheep feed my sheep And later parted the same in the same chapter 21 john 21 verse 19 He says jesus indicted the man in which he would Die So even his death was already predicted by jesus so peter Actually also experienced some of the special miracles some of the special miracles like First even before he could follow jesus he received a miracle of the catch of fish first Second catch of fish was after the ascension of jesus again all the disciples along with peter They went back to the same fish trade The whole night they toyed they didn't find a fish And next day in the morning at the command of the man from the shore They they cast their net and they caught the fish and that's what made peter to realize that it was the son of God who's been ascended and here even before the boat could reach the shore along with the other disciples Peter jumps out of the boat he swims first and comes to meet jesus Saying that you are the true messiah and he asks for forgiveness For the act that he did by denying him three times and jesus reaffirming friend of all the other disciples He forgets about the act that he did but then he appoints and he commissions him to be the leader for his Then we also see his mother-in-law was healed by cheese some of the Miracles that we see from the gospels are is that you know He was the only one to walk on the water at the invitation of Jesus and he also experienced the amount of Transfiguration along with the other two disciples from the inner circle And also he was the one who caught the fish with the coin in its mouth to pay the tax and peter Let me just give me a minute. Let me check that out Yeah, this was the large fish that was caught in the word of jesus Okay, this is okay um Yeah, peter was a key player in the book of acts when we read through the acts it talks about two people Okay, about a posse peter and a posse board So peter was a key player in the book of acts And in the life of the early church now How do we know that in the book of acts chapter one and two it addresses that how peter encouraged The rest of the apostles in the process to replace Judas So he took the leadership Now Judas is not there somebody should replace him so that they are 12 Apostles And he preached the main message on the day of pentecost at this very uh a message 3000 Came into the knowledge of Christ We also see that he became a man of many miracles how in the book of acts it's recorded that he Healed a lame man along with the apostle John as he was entering the Temple this lame man was lame from the bird this man was lame from the He was crippled from the bird and you know, he was expecting arms As peter and john were walking in he was looking at their hands and here peter says i do not have Silver or gold but in the name of jesus christ of nazareth rise up and walk You also see that this shadow falling on people resulted in healing and Deliverance, we also see some of the other healing that he healed a man by the name of Highness in lighter He also raised darkness from the death In jopa we see that in acts chapter nine when we read through from verse 33 to 42 We see these two miracles there. You also stood strong In the face of persecution when we see persecution He stood strong In fact, you know, we see that at the end peter was crucified upside down But here in times of persecution christians were persecuted in The in in robe under the empire Nero And here apostle peter was encouraging the christian believers or the jewish christians and the others who followed jesus to stack strong at the time of persecution He pronounced judgment to uh on ananias and safira who fell dead by his very word He was also imprisoned on several locations and you know when the Uh As he was praying on one day, you know, there was a There was a door that was opened by faith to the gentiles toward the house of cornellius where he received this vision and god God revealed it to him that you know, there will be three people coming to call him And go to their house and proclaim the word and the holy spirit And counted cornellius and his household and this was the first time that peter Experienced how god can open a door among the gentiles And later he was also the main spokesperson at the jerusalem council which took place on addressing many issues in those days, yeah We also see that he made many Trips in some cases he traveled with his wife We read in first correntines chapter nine verse five where it says do we have No right to take along the believing wife As do also the other apostles the brothers of the lord and See first so see uh peter seemed to have traveled on many occasions along with his wife and the When we read through the book of angst we see that he traveled to Traveled and minister at samaria along with john and he ministered in lyder and sharon He also ministered at jobas the seria and he visited the church in anthea And he also traveled across asia minor and he ministered there And finally it says that he spent time in babel on babel on those days is considered to be For rome it was a popular code named for rome among the victims of its oppressions. Yeah Further we see that the later the last days peter seemed to have lived in rome and he was crucified upside down By the hands of narrow The audience to whom this letter was addressed to was to the uh Jewish christians who were scattered across the asia minor and other places So he was writing this letter and encouraging the jewish and the gentile believers to withstand the persecution by keeping by um Encouraging them to be focused on jesus christ alone so that they can withstand the persecution what they're going through for the reward is much greater than what they are going through and uh Yeah, this is what it is and the occasion of this letter as we know that he was writing this letter to the people and he was writing this letter from rome itself It was uh, approximately the date that this letter was addressed was from 63 to 65 ad The main message let's go into the main message of first peter Yeah, the main message is peter's guarantee that he is uh, uh, it when we This is from second peter Okay, the first peter's main message is he is addressing that this letter Uh to the to the people who have been persecuted In different regions One of the reason how this persecution was birthed was um, you know the the emperor nero He himself set certain people to uh set the rome on fire and he there's a burn Among the 14 uh region can he burn and he and he and he blamed the christians for burning the rome for destroying for getting the rome destroyed because of the christians and what he did is He resulted in uh, you know persecuting the christians by throwing them Throwing them as a pray to the beast live and he burned some of the christians as a live tortures in this public garden And he only uh increased the intensity of the uh of the uh Persecution toward the christian so peter gives certain instruction and how to face and handle this Persecution he encouraged the believers like do not give up on what you're going through for your reward is greater Suffering for righteous Is part of the call of the believer you also say suffering uh is to be patiently endured Without retaliating you also says suffering can be a blessing when we read uh First peter chapter 2 and 3 we see that he's addressing on certain uh certain issues on Suffering and he encourages them because there's no other way for us to run away from this But then he says he is he's encouraging the believers as he's encouraging He's not running away from suffering, but then even he is enduring it. So he is just Sharing it from his own experience. So he's encouraging the other believers saying that suffering can be a blessing He is demonstrating from his own life And he also says that suffering identifies us with christ because even he's suffered on our behalf and uh, you also say suffering is part of god's will and that should be the nature of Christianity and because of all this we can actually enjoy Rejoice during the suffering that is something that we see the lifestyle of the apostles They actually rejoiced during the suffering. We also saw in peter's Uh episodes like how peter and sylas were cast into the prison, but instead of you know talking about the um The the persecution what they're going through or unfairness But they rejoiced and praised god because they rejoiced and praised god god showed up There was a great earthquake in the prison and they were released and the jailer's household was saved through that And your peace is encouraging all the other believers to rejoice in suffering So that may be some of the unique features of this book is He was the eyewitness of the suffering of christ and he was also the eyewitness in the transfiguration And with that he also charged the elders to feed the flock Just like how jesus asked him to feed the flock. We see uh, peter Raises the leadership and holds the same great model of leadership in his ministry He raised leaders and and put the leaders in charge of taking care of the flock He encouraged the audience to be clothed with humility because that should be the nature of the of Of the christian believers And we also see The nature of peter just like how jackson was shedding few instances of peter's nature as he was with jesus This nature was so very different. He was very aggressive. He was very Impetuous quick the judgment very ambitious. He was a person who was unpredictable But here after the death of jesus we see peter as a very different man There's a reputable change in him as a leader as a leader We see that when we read through the book of acts and when we read through his epistle first and second peter We see that there's a stability in his leadership He seemed to be very patient loving kind and humble servant of god These qualities that which was not present in peter before we see those qualities of christ He lived very evidently as a leader and also he addresses himself in first peter chapter five when we Read through first peter chapter five He's saying the elders who are among you. I absorb I who am a fellow elder He humbles himself and says i'm like you a fellow servant of god fellow elder Okay, and also when we read in first peter I'm just reading on few Scriptures and asking the class to read because I want to complete both these letters in this class Yeah first peter chapter one verse seven we see that We're talking about the genuineness of our faith being much more precious than gold that can bear it Though just tested but fire by fire But maybe found to praise on a glory at the revelation of christ and then also in other scriptures We see the word called Precious been used more than uh about eight times in both Peter's letter first and second letter. He uses this word called precious So he says like a faith more precious than gold and in verse 19 chapter 1 verse 9 being again He addresses saying that the precious blood of jesus christ Again, he says the precious among the chosen cornerstone And in chapter 3 verse 4 he addresses the precious gentle and quiet spirit And in second peter chapter 1 verse 4 is addressing on the great and precious promises So with that we will move on to second peter now first peter This book is known as The book of suffering and glory And second peter is addressed as the book of true knowledge Second peter is addressed as the book of true knowledge. I just take few more extra minutes to complete this letter


Yo what is up you guys, welcome back to another video. Today we are back on Hot Diggity Demon's channel, and we're gonna be reacting to his 1.MV. Before we begin this I wanna start this series on the channel called, I used to watch this when I was 6.  There was another video by Hot Diggity Demon. I believe it was the Applejack one or the party MOV one we see right there. You guys are like, I remember watching this when I was 6 or whatever. Well, if you guys have more of those videos that you used to watch when you were 6 years old and they're all twisted and demented and not meant for 6 year olds. I want you to comment the link down below because I wanna do a little series on all those type of videos because I think it would be awesome. Alright with that being said guys, make sure to smash the like button in 3, 2, 1, go go smash the like button one year later. Oh not this guy again. I remember when he did the last time and it wasn't pleasant. What, oh Ponyville? Dude, it's destroyed. Does this have their party.mov? I can't believe it or not. What? Oh my god, what happened to this? Rarity is watching you. Something like Rarity took over. Rainbow Dash!  Why is he poking up there with the stick? God, did Twilight's experiment really bring you back from the dead? I was never dead, I was in a coma. Thanks for burying me alive by the way. Oh, yeah sorry about that. I guess at some point somebody probably should have taken your pulse or something. Well, what I missed. Uh, things haven't been going so great actually. Discord, wolf lore, an army of robots that look like you, tornadoes, fires, earthquakes, meteors. There was a flesh eating virus for a while, a bunch of people got lymphoma after the bombs dropped. Then there was this whole civil war between the earth ponies and the pegasi. Where's Twilight? Twilight? What's wrong with you girl? Hey Twilight, how's your hammer hanging? Yo, I'm back. Are you happy to see me? Hey Twilight, who am I? Who am I Twilight? I'm you, sourpuss. Dude, what's up with her man? I wanted to save Ponyville, but I couldn't do it. I failed. All because I was abandoned by people I thought were my friends. Rarity, Fluttershy, Pinky. None of them would help me find the elements of harmony. Now everyone in Ponyville is dead. So much for friendship being magic. Ah, come on Twilight, there's no problem that friendship can't solve.  Watch. Just gonna reunite them all, watch. Oh! Rainbow Dash of Fate just filled up. Going back in time, is he? Oh, just created a warpall. What? What in the world is going on? Is that Rainbow Dash? We got his third eye. Oh, there it is! Crushed our homes and destroyed countless lives. The atrocities you've committed against Ponykind are abhorrent and unforgivable and demand swift sovereign justice. But because I am honourable by the laws of peace and amnesty, I am issuing one final warning to you, Discord.  Die, Discord. Die. Maybe not. Did I just squish someone? Hey, you're squeezing people out. That's interesting. Just staring. Like nowadays, bro, everybody be recording everything. What? The torch should have done to, um, Thanos.  I ate Mondays. Not today. They're all swimming in blood. What in my mouth again? Just say the SH word. Sorry, Mrs. Radity. Poor Rainbow Dash. Back to a coma. Why don't you be a dream? Get well soon, Dashhole. We're positively fabulous, darling. And I'm not just being generous. Hey, hey, hey. You can come in my shed any day.  Thank you for saving Ponyville Rainbow Dash. I guess.  Ah, geez. My wings are gone. Yeah, not like I wanted those or anything. Those wings that I used to fly.  Whatever did happen to those elements of harmony. Hey, look. Here are the elements of harmony. They were up my nose the whole time. What? Yo, what the fudge, sickle? Applejack, where have you been? I feel like we haven't seen you in forever. Hey, y'all. I'm back for my adventures in another dimension. Yeah, OK, whatever. Nobody really cares. Nobody cares. But I saved the entire multiverse from a giant- Nobody cares, Applejack. But I- Nobody cares! You s- Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh. Oh, my God.    Why do you so mean Applejack?  Nobody cares. Hey, guys. You know what I just realized? We're all together again.  I guess friendship really is magic. Oh! Man, you guys are- I need to get some guy friends. Just poot? Disgusting. Alright, this seems like they, uh, successfully fixed the future. They went back in time. Well, they rainbowed after them back in time and destroyed the discord. And now the town seems to be getting restored. Not the apples. Oh, no. We've seen this. We've seen what happens with the apples. Well, I did it. I ate every apple in the whole dang orchard. He- Wow. Literally dead. How do you like them apples? Huh. Come on. Alright, you guys. Well, that was party.mov. As you can see. What if you guys enjoyed the video? Make sure to smash the like button. If you're new to the channel, make sure to subscribe and turn that notification bell out and hit all notifications when you do so.  We're going to call it What I Watch When I Was 6. Something like that? I don't know. But if you guys have any of these twisted videos that you would watch when you were six, let me know down below. Comment it down below or try to leave the link so I can check it out and that would be definitely very helpful. And, yeah, thank you for watching. Thank you guys for the support, as always. And I will see you on the next one.


This has been Captain West Point reporting for Mediterranean on board the USS Iwo Jima. What's going on here Captain? Hey Chief, some Army guy reporting on the latest conflict.  Yes sir. This is the year we beat Navy.  Launch the Sarnivo, the Chief is in the water. I hope Army swims better than they play football. Go Navy. Beat Army.