What's up everybody Jason from Jasper's case breaks calm. We just sold out 2020 panini prism football hobby Six box break pick a jeans number seven and again guys seven and eight are from the same hobby case all cart ship That little team randomizer so customers that have a little character sign at the end of their name One was a little team randomizer And here you go all the way down there So half case for guys, let's open up this case All right, so one two three for the left side four five six for the right side, so let's quickly switch scenes I'm gonna use a little virtual dice. I'm not even trying to like lose these dice while I'm trying to roll it With all these boxes here. So again one two three for the left side four five six for the right side Let's click roll dice and it is a six So one two three left four five six right side and I'm just gonna post up big eight So you guys know that this is for number eight No Tony, I only actually did about a case and a half only did the two two box breaks and a full case When I was here on release day, I haven't broken anything since I did pull a 101 black fine Pulled a Joe borough autograph and a Joe borough color, but I've really had much prism So very excited to finally do another half case or potentially hopefully the second half as well In my limited cases that I've did my case and a half. I would say I don't do too bad for customers 101 CD lamb black fine. I was awesome I Had a buddy of mine pulled one up put one up Early Friday morning because he pulled it late Thursday night before the release. He got some from his buddy He pulled one. He put it up on eBay and he was getting close to ten thousand dollar offers But he said he got so nervous that he just took it down But he was sending me screenshots of the legit offers. He was getting for it. I was like blown away. I Honestly thought those are gonna start out like four thousand dollars, but Jesus, he was getting almost ten thousand dollar offers for that So he took it down and he just said he doesn't know he wants to do with it Oh, well, we probably personally did I actually didn't though Yeah, we probably did though and do we pull and do we pull to it? But Yeah, I mean even my Oregon ducks color blast that I have I have a Oregon ducks one that I paid Like 200 bucks back when prison draft picks first came out Sounds like a thousand bucks now. Oh nice cascade. Yeah, I mean, I was very shocked. It was gonna go that high I think that's a solid offer But like I told him I was like, you know, don't be afraid to sell it right because you only he said he bought one box So, I mean at the end of the day, you're gonna make your you're gonna make your one K back But you know, like I said usually the first First one to hit eBay if anything usually tends to sell for the most because people really want it, you know But But yeah, I mean, like I said, he was getting like legit nine thousand dollar offers and I was just blown away Just cuz it was just for so high That's what I advised him to do it, too If you said I told him if it was really really good like centering was nice and everything Send it into PSA do like a five-day turnaround two-day turnaround see what you get And then if it's friggin graded a 10 something like that then you're damn. It's definitely more than 10,000 then Well, Tony, there's people that want to sell the color blasts that are graded for 3,000 But the last raw sold for a thousand best offer accepted back in like October so it could be worth more actually now because some time has passed but I Don't know did the Herbert really have a whole bad day or was it influenced because the whole team just had a bad day Cuz I mean it did lose like 45 nothing, right? speaking of the Herbert Speaking of the Herbert mark with the Chargers. How about a little purple Justin Herbert? 49 out of 125 Speak the man pops up. Look at that Javon Kinlo And we got Jonathan Taylor out of 49 patch autograph nice Purple power to Indianapolis Colts. That's going to Kurt. What if that was a personal box? Are you and a camel Shawn Alexander? Man? This is a great box 19 out of 25 KJ Hamler had new rugs Ed Reid purple power out of 49 then Jefferson trick one Smith Little silver here Ian Thomas Donal driver What a 199 I Next one I Wow Four boxes there was in the last pack of the second box and no reason to open up the next two no more Keep them keep them sealed whenever you feel that You want to resell those boxes because the price is double If in the future the price is double triple and you just feel like you want to rip them because You're never gonna find a box at the price you paid for the first time Can I always do it that way as well? You got Ryan Tannehill out of 199 Jonathan Taylor josea diggara Later man Tyler Johnson Keen Keelan Cole green scope Yeah, I mean, that's that's valid and that's okay to say right like you don't want to like Bring yourself down or put yourself down, but yeah, that's like a that's like a once in a lifetime type of hit because It's not a one-of-one, but there's so extremely rare Phillip Lindsay to 99 So it's valid for you to say that for sure And the fact that it was a herb or two I honestly was debating on buying one of those just to complete it with my organ ducks one, but Not for those prices I'd have to pay it down like if it was like a payment plan if I wanted to do that Mark he's brown Michael Pittman, Jr. DJ Dallas. No, yes, but that's the one thing It's like not all one-on-ones are worth $10,000 So as I said like even though it's not a one-on-one. It's like really Really really tough to get Marvin Jones, Jr.. So that's why I get to appreciate like I would say that that CD lamb I hit because that is legit a one-on-one and it's an autograph So that one's super super tough, but I feel like you have better chance of finding those than you do of of Colorbloss and speaking of CD land. Look at that green scope CD lamb Cowboys win a Matthew who got that in a team filler. Look at that man Team randomizer. I should say Adrian Amos 125 Tyler Igby, I honestly don't know to be honest Kyle I'm very curious to see what his market is for like a one-on-one prison, but the good thing is that it's a one-on-one prism You know, you know, the good thing is that it's a one-on-one prism so I But um, whatever you talk about kids talk talk about to go on to talk about to what you want to talk about to for Oh, I got you You're right, you're right. I was like what okay, okay, but see that's unplanned actually that's that's unplanned. Oh Yeah, cascade for sure So yeah, that's what I mean that It's okay for you to say that you'll never hit a hit like that ever again cuz It's extremely rare Chris Jones Are you Anthony? I know you just want to see it too Well, this is another thing guys and I I want to stick by it Because it's gonna happen, but I just don't know how Herbert collectors are gonna take it But let me just tell you this his prices will drop when the offseason comes It's just normal it all every sport has its drops, especially in the offseason But I want I want to say that Herbers is gonna stay relatively strong and competitive. I Think if anything what will drop is his base You know, maybe his silvers, but I feel like the silvers are actually really tough to hit in these two I don't think I see as many silvers as I as I'd like for rookie silvers But um, I know his base will drop some some some of his stuff is gonna drop regardless But I think obviously the best time to sell someone he is now Especially someone like a Herbert. I mean if unless you're you're you're gonna predict that he's gonna be a Superstar from here on out then you hold on to him and I also tell people to like let's say Cascade right for instance He said he bought four boxes, so depending on what the price you got him for the average of the boxes about thousand So you're about four thousand in there, right? For some of that may have bought one box hell one pack Then I don't blame you for holding on to him because you know, you didn't really spend too much to get it But his prices will always sell much better During the season and especially his rookie season Unless he's gonna turn out to be Patrick Mahomes Because Other unlike Patrick Mahomes, I feel like every quarterback in these last couple years draft class that have been up and down Lamar Jackson was selling for so much money last year and people took advantage and just sold so much of him and made so much money And then people wanted to continue to buy him in the off season and now Lamar is Kind of sunk down to what he was before pre last year, you know The only one that has consistently been playing good every year since his start is Really been Patrick Mahomes Josh Allen has jumped up this year, but he's kind of jumped up like Lamar did last year But is he gonna stay like that every year? It's kind of hard to predict, you know, but I think colored last for you cascaded It's not gonna go down. I Think those will always be really expensive See, that's the one thing he's gonna win rookie the year. He should I think it should go up but Like when are they gonna announce rookie the year though? Is it gonna be like? How many weeks after the season because by then if people start seeing Patrick Mahomes in the playoffs people start seeing potentially to a in the playoffs because they're actually in a playoff position. I Mean honestly, people want to be focusing their attention on to a and other players in the postseason rather than Herbert You know what I mean because yeah, he's probably gonna win rookie the year. He deserves it regardless of what happens, but Someone else is gonna have views on on other players In the in the postseason and the one thing out of all these rookie quarterbacks is two was in a position to be in a playoff game And all it takes is for him to have one good game in the playoffs and they win This stuff is just gonna explode. So I don't I always see people's logic of just holding on to it until he runs Rick in the year, but it's just that I think that It's not as relevant because their teams on the playoffs anymore by them But I do see Herbert being a really really good quarterback You know, I've been watching him since he was playing in Oregon as a true freshman. I really thought I That he would be a little different than the traditional Oregon quarterbacks have popped out of there You know So I don't expect his stuff to drop too much I Think once he starts winning his stuff is probably gonna go up much more I just imagine that the Chargers are actually winning This whole time and potentially in a playoff spot his stuff would be exploding right now even more than that already is But the fact is that of course the Chargers aren't that good AJ Turrell Yeah, Logan. I was very surprised dude. I only bought it for 200 bucks back back in like winter first one prison Drop picks first popped up Pay that 200 bucks for that. So I'm actually it's actually in PSA right now. So Hopefully Hopefully grades of 10 No way Those other offers that or those other buy-and-galls that people have them for for like 3,000 graded Will be more realistic if it comes back a 10 Cal Fuller And the good thing is that Oregon's program they have a lot of good loyal fans So his Oregon stuff should never really drop so much only time it ever drops is only because the NFL stuff pops out but From here on out Oregon stuff should be consistent Mark Hooper No, I don't know Tony. I still would have I still would have I Still would keep ones.  It really is just gone through so much And I mean to be realistic the team is just not good at all But Hertz came in here and got a little spark a little momentum and that's what he was needed So I would probably still would take once to be honest, man, I don't think off is that crazy good either I think it's Sean McVeigh's office. That's that's the way I see it and then McFarlane, Jr But if I can go back in time, let's not draft once and then just draft Patrick Mahomes a year later Let me do that instead But should I go back in time just even this year and go draft Justin Jefferson and go draft maybe DK Metcalfe last year any Clark Although I like I like Jalen Rager. He actually did pretty good today. You got a kickoff a punt return for touchdown I just think you need to get a more plays involved with him. That's all and we got for the Denver Broncos As All right next one guys All right looks like we only have three left in that filler actually sold out now sold out of the filler For the hip-hack so looks like we'll be doing that next 13 left in a mac at the baseball 12 left and flawless So I'm assuming that Um, oh nice even a team all sold out already sweet team all sold out too So I'm gonna grab the calves. So it looks like we'll be doing back-to-back either hip-hacks first or Or Team all but we'll do both those right after this. I don't even see your name on here, bro I hope so man. I haven't really pulled any rookie silver though I feel like rookie silvers in this year's prism has been really tough to hit But when you hit a silver they sell really well Think someone said Justin Herbert Silver's raw we're going for about a thousand and I could pull a base I'll probably pull autograph before I pull silver Yeah, rookie silver has been really tough to hit so far At least a couple cases and boxes of them Patty Mahomes, how about that? Who has a chiefs? Kessler with that one 81 out of 125 miles Boykin got Jonathan Ogden Raven's gonna George Oh Trayquan Smith, Visca T Higgins, Chase Claypool, Jeremy Chinn Carolina Panthers Rayquan Davis and little Tua Nick Chubb Fletcher Cox Silver Rayquan Davis out of 249 Isaiah Simmons Ricky Devin Duvernay, we got Quinn Nelson Joe Burrow You got LaVisca Chanel junior Jaguars we have part of the team random and Jaguars mark Oh, man, we got points 600 points I Had a horrible week in fancy this week on the players were injured didn't perform well All right, next box us Bruce Smith Bills on a shot we got a Byron Murphy silver and So like Juan Barclay 18 out of 25 Camel better now you Jake from Marquise Brown hurts When we Jake from very nice green scope and a little hurly base Damian Arnett Hunter Henry Are we gonna get two patch autographs in the sink six boxes There could be two patch autos in this master case guys Look at this guys got another patch auto and this time tonight and I'm he Sean Vaughn I Marcus Lawrence And To 1 49 for the Cowboys chase young I Have a dig is it so funny I Last box we're the last one today Did they win nice Seems like it was a passing day today the running game also had like a hundred plus yards They're all To be a championship close that's right foulers Triflowers Mario Davis That press Number Jaffa Cuda Golden tape They have a look Lane Johnson And Clyde Edwards e-lair 149 Ross Blacklock Logan Wilson And a Michael Vick camera Falcons going to Ryan 20 out of 25, that's pretty nice Colin Johnson Chandler Jones And out of 35 Cornelius Bennett franchise legends bills That is going to Ryan Oh, sorry, no Sean and there you go guys. So quickly do a little recap So we have 600 points we're gonna give away guys We do not we offer for you guys to pay for the insurance I think priority mail when it's priority you get an automatic like hundred or hundred and fifty dollars of insurance, but We do not but we definitely advise you guys, especially if you guys hit something really big You guys can always hit us up at the support button But no we do not Only if you guys request it oh For myself. Yeah, definitely. I think I think it's always okay to be on the safe side Because like I said, you could be that one in thousands or you know people hundreds of people that have their package lost so I think it's It's not it's not too bad It ends up being something really small with feet depending on how much you price out your head So yeah, like for your answers if you're gonna insure for like nine thousand at least It's probably gonna be like 90 bucks maybe maybe a hundred bucks But it's something so small compared to what you're valuing at where it's like just to be safe But you know always have to fully value it at 9,000 if you'd like you can always value it or whatever you'd like I feel like also when you insure it I know is it like is it like I feel like when you insure it It's more like us UPS and USPS know that like we shouldn't mess this up. So Let's get it there safely Yeah, it's usually about a dollar and change or something for every hundred dollars. So it's something like that Yeah, you just never know so just to be safe. All right, I guess so then a lot of a lot of base Lot of base lot of base. Let me show you guys the color I So there you go, it's all the color don't people Jones auto hiding in there. Let me show you guys the autos now too as well So people Jones, you got a purple Patty Mahomes Herb base, you got a Tyler John or sorry Keecham Vaughan patch auto 99 to a base the positional junior auto Ben the nuchy the nuchy The nuchy I think it is Colin Johnson Cornelius Bennett franchise legends to 35 Anthony Farland jr. Got a little autograph there for the Broncos Michael Josiah the gar CD lamb green scopes to 75 Patch auto John Taylor and a beautiful Herbert purple to 125 So there you go And again the second half is in the store for you guys want to run it back and we're gonna give away 600 points That's those good dice roller Let's get that list here original customer names Dice roller five and a five ten times. Good luck one two three four five Six seven eight nine Brian plant so there you go You have this insanity bangles so they go six hundred bucks or six hundred points I should say going your way pretty sure guys jasmine's case breaks.com


Hi. Hello. Thanks for coming here. We are going to talk about interfaces for animation. So the things you are going to see here is not new. I don't know if it is right to call it revolutionary, because the revolution happens continuously. Revolution is a common thing here. We do that all day. The thing is it's more about the freedom of creating new way of interacting with our 3D characters or 3D entities, because 3D is not just about the character, even if it is the part that fascinates me the most. But yeah, it's about thinking of new ways without throwing away everything we got. So it's kind of a conservative revolution. So I see many faces. I don't know. I'm kind of surprised. My name is Paolo. I am a computer programmer and I work on 3D, so I write plugins for 3D applications, some standalone applications, but everything comes down to animation, BFX, sometimes prototypation. But yeah, I am a 3D programmer. And in the past, I used to be a 3D artist. That's how I started, and that's a very common thing in our industry. Most of us are former generalists.  But most of us are. And most 3D artists have an analytical set of skill that kind of overlaps. I don't think the two roles are that separated. And I am also a very sophisticated person. Thank you. I work as a developer for a company, which is called binary alchemy. It is based in Germany, but it's a fully remote company, so I get to see it in Italy. And we work on a render farm manager, which is called Royal Render. It is used in many countries in the world. The very nice thing is we get feedback about the pipelines which are used in our customer studios. The use of Blender is increasing more and more. When I joined Royal Render, Blender was optional, an optional application who had to be installed using a different repository. Now it's kind of interesting to see how Blender is a must-have in a pipeline. Even if it is not used, you can no longer avoid having Blender in your rooster. So it's a good thing because we are getting feature requests that are specific to Blender. Usually that happened only for the main commercial platforms. Now we are starting to develop Blender plugins. We are thinking of releasing them as standalone plugins and make them freely available. So that's very interesting. That's very good for me because Blender has a special place in my heart. I started doing 3D in Blender when I started to do it seriously. I don't remember the exact year. I remember this bird who welcomed me into this wonderful journey of 3D. I have kept using Blender for my personal stuff. Whenever I can choose what to use for my personal projects or whenever I want to test some idea about a new approach, I always use Blender. And I have a YouTube channel in which I show my add-ons or the way I can handle tasks in 3D. It's called Bulls and Ninjas after a joke about my first portfolio because when I started working in 3D, my portfolio consisted mainly of sport balls that I had modeled for commercials. This character, which is my first character, I modeled this after a concept that another Blender user posted on forums on what is now Blender Italia, the Italian forum of Blender Artists. So this was my first fully working character. I was very proud of the incredible feature I could put into it. It had IK, FK controls, reverses, control shapes. It's stuff that we take for granted, but that looked like, oh yeah, this is cutting-edge technology now. And when I needed characters for my videos, I imported this into Blender 3 and made it, give it a new materials to make it work with a new render. And it was very interesting to see how much has changed because render now is real time, is physically based. And we model using scout mode. It's like modeling clay. We don't do box model anymore now. And when it comes to rigging, now we rig by putting bones inside the model. It's still the same stuff. And the thing is, if we think about it, the job of a modeler has changed so much. The job of a texture artist of a look dev. If we could take a time machine, go back to the 90s and start working on 3D, it would be completely different. We would need to readjust our workflow, but rigging is a time travel compliance skill, apparently. Because it hasn't changed that much. That's the feeling. So how come that everything changes and rigging is the same? Perhaps rigging is the pinnacle of evolution. Or maybe it is a living fossil. It is something that still is around because Mother Nature forgot about it. So I want to have a look at it. Let's look at this in action. This is a wonderful model, in my opinion. It's the dodge from the memes. My Twitter friend, Pierre Schiller sent this. So here's shadowboxing. That's how come. He's in such a good shape. And we have these bones, these oxygel widgets, which are a good approximation of our locomotor system. They are, of course, inside the body. I know you know this already. The thing is, it makes sense that those are centered inside the body because that's where the full chroma of rotation is. But the thing is, you need X-ray in order to visualize them or in order to interact with them. So what we do is another thing that you know well about. We draw these wireframe shapes so that they can go around the model. They can be selected because they grow outside of the model. And since we are there, we create an additional system that can be used for inverse kinematics. Every animator can choose. This is a riggy favorite rig. Most of us are familiar with it. So it has these widgets, these displays that allow animators to work. And we put both sets of widgets in every character because you might need both. You want to use forward kinematics to animate actions that start from the body and propagate to the limbs. And we require inverse kinematics when the action starts from the extremity, from the hand or the arc of strings like the floor. And you cannot know which one you will need for each shot because if the character is standing on his hands, then the hand must be inverse kinematic because it has a constraint and so on. So we put both inside the same rig. This has been called Uber rig somehow because it's an old-purpose rig that can switch between a key and a F key. This is a very simple rig but still it embodies the knowledge delivered to us by very competent people who made sure that we could find a way to animate our character. And it is the Bonafide hero of the entertainment industry because allowed to get things done for more than 20 years. So yeah, I think it's a very interesting technical achievement. But even on this simple rig we can see so much stuff that it is a little bit crowded with all those widgets in there. And the thing is even if those wireframe curves are an improvement over octahedral display, you lose the direction of the limb. For instance, this is a very easy to read pose. But sometimes it's very hard to find the right ball for the right limb that you want to tweak. So we also design interfaces to interact with that. This is an early experiment of mine. I tried to design a peeker but I wanted to draw my own custom widgets and implement some advanced behavior. So I tried to integrate the PySight library in Blender and it was difficult because PySight is already a Python wrapper to an external library which is called QT. It works very well on applications that are using the QT library already, like Maya and most commercial applications. But Blender uses its own graphic interface and that means that you are going to have both the QT library runs its own application internally. So it's going to be very heavy and computationally expensive in Blender, mind it, because the QT library is actually very efficient. So that was a very nice experiment but it couldn't really work. It required too much work only to exist. When I came to this conference in 2017, I met with Christophe Sou, French TD, who made something very clever. He was using OpenGL, the OpenGL buffer in order to draw his own shapes on the directly on Blender's interface. This was interesting because you could script advanced behavior without requiring any external dependency. So yeah, made quite a sensation. I'm so sad Christophe is not here this year but everybody is talking about him. Christophe left a mark because he is the author of the classroom scene which is used in many benchmarks. So yeah, thanks Christophe. So with that in mind, I started to work on my own widget library that used the same principle but was extended to a much more generic purpose library that could be useful to everyone but I never told anyone about it. I worked on it in secret and this is the first time. This is ever displayed anywhere and then I stopped working on it because there were a few things I didn't like. Artifacts could happen when I tried to draw on the OpenGL buffer over 3D objects and also it requires to run inside of a model operator and that's about themal because that can interfere with other operators or with some Blender's routines. So yeah, these go back to the bin. But I then searched on the Blender API documentation something that I don't do as much as I should. I searched for something that could handle events and something was there, a long time neglected entity that can be used to draw widgets and act on events. There is even a very nice example in the Blender Python templates and you can see that you can input 3D coordinates here and you find it there so it's like 3D objects that are not part of the scene. They are just there for display and you can write custom behavior for these objects. So it's impressive level of control we are given I wasn't aware of that and many people I spoke with weren't there, I don't know why. Anyway, with that in mind I thought that I could do something similar to an old proposal. Anybody remember this? This is from the Gooseberry project. We got very excited when we could see those wonderful widgets. They were so happy, oh, I can't wait to use this that they never came because those sadly were never made into production. So I tried to build something similar in Python with moderate success. This is an add-on that I called because I thought I was good with names but maybe I'm not. It did what I wanted to. It displays these overlays, these overlaying widgets rather than curve shapes and I could use them to select my controls on the character. But no action was implemented. I tried to work over that but then I stopped trying. The same fate that happened to phase map widgets happened to my Pismo as well. So I thought it was the end but it wasn't because the methods that it from the Blender Institute expanded from this and the other idea into something that can be used, something that can trigger actions. So this is the bomb gates most that are part of this cloud rig. I'm so sorry. I had to resort to unlimited gifs rather than videos so what I can display here is limited but with mouse click you can select bones and by dragging you can translate them or rotate them the behavior can be configured in the interface. It's very nice. The very clever idea about his implementation is that he resorts to, he is using Blender native operators to handle the transformation. So you get all the existing stuff, all the autokey and all Blender utilities with a new widget. The only cons is in the words of the materials himself, how much it takes to set this up because for every widget you have to select which vertex group is going to be shown which behavior you want to associate. So it is true that it is time consuming but we tend to forget that also setting up those wireframe curves is time consuming. We rely on a set of tools that has been built over decades and made it easier and faster. So perhaps we could do the same thing about these new widgets. Here comes another addon of mine. I called it explicate, same reason as before for the name. I use it to convert characters across one package to the other here. I am converting an Unreal rig to a Rigify rig. This is not the only tool that does it. There's plenty. But the idea behind this tool is that once you convert one rig to another, you can convert all that it comes with. It's like all the animations, well, kind of that's ideally what would happen. Sometimes there are some fixes that must be done by hand. But yeah, so it can convert stuff. Once a character has been explained to this addon and it supports Rigify and other known rigs and allows to define custom rigs. So if I have this tool and if I throw the meta widgets into the mix, I can have fast setup for my widgets. I have a Rigify rig becoming a bone gizmos rig. So now I could have all the characters I wanted using this new system. And the problem with this new system became evident to me. The reason why it never took off maybe was that this setup suffers from a real estate problem because some areas of the character have more widgets than available surface. So for instance, how would I handle the hips where you have two controls, one for the torso and one for the reverse hips. It becomes very hard to allow the user to select either torso or hips. Perhaps I could split the region being in two, but then it would be harder to select it. So I really, really wanted to use this new system. And I thought that perhaps it was wrong to think that I had to find a way to select the hips. It's not like I say I want to select the hips. I want to select the heel. What I want to do is move the torso or move the hips. It's the artistic choice that comes first. It's a matter of design rather than just mechanics. So what I did was resorting to hotkeys. In these examples, okay, thanks God videos are playing. And in these examples, I only select the region of the hips, the first control of the spine. And when I do that, I can rotate the entire torso. But when I want to switch and move only the lower part of the body, I press stop. So that's how I could work around the limited space that I had for all the, to accommodate all the widgets. And the same happened for the feet. Because when you have a reverse foot setup, you can move just the foot or you can select the heel to raise the heel or you can spin on the forefoot. And again, we could, we can toggle, we can loop towards this different behavior using function keys. And that's possible because you can implement any logic in a custom gizmo. So when the old system was designed, there was no way to do this. You could not make a control act in different ways. But now you can, you can make context aware controls because you can script whatever you want or almost inside those event functions. And not just that, you can use pie menus. Because again, my aim was just animating from the viewport. What I was aiming to do is I don't want to use menus. I don't want to use panel. Everything I need or at least everything that I need ordinarily must be readily available. So in, in this example, I have triggered, I have added an F key pie menu that can be triggered using the alt key when clicking on the control. And so all of that is not hard coded. It can be configured. But these options, these options in the bone panel are already too crowded. And I want to, I would like this behavior to be as much as flexible as possible. So I think that rather than having this option fields inside the property panels, these gizmos should have their own three node tree. We should have a graph in which we can create our own widgets using visual scripting. So for instance, display a widget over this region of the mesh can become this node setup. And when, when the mouse hovers a widget, just display and highlight effect can be this. We can have an event node, a color node. So this is a quick mockup than using geometry nodes. But yeah, that's to convey the idea. So there are opinions about nodes. Everybody loves nodes. I do. Sometimes they can become hard to read. But for this kind of stuff, I think they are the right balance between flexibility and clarity. I think this is not going to become too messy. But that's what everybody thinks. I cannot be sure on that. But yeah, I would like to implement that in the future. And maybe I will, or maybe someone else will. Because the next thing about what I, what I'm talking about is all this stuff acted across the work of different persons. And we co-operated. We worked together without being together sometimes, most of the time, without even writing to each other. And by the way, I love our online meetings. I like exchanging our opinion and clues. But the thing is when it came to developing this stuff, we were able to minimize the required communication. This is something that I love about open source. There is a sensible human factor. And we are here. We are now living it when it comes to growth, to personal growth, to learning new things, to sharing what we do. And when it comes to carrying on our tasks, we can just look at each other code. We can just build on each other's solutions. And we can just be happy about it. So yeah, this is not ending here. This is going on. Someone will do this. If you want to play with this code, you will find the experimental branch of explicate that has this implementation. There are some hacks here and there. It's so experimental. But yeah, I will be happy for you to try that. And I want to thank everyone for coming here. I don't know how much time we have. Oh, we have 20 minutes. So we can have a QA. Or if you fail to grab lunch, perhaps there's still something I don't know. Thanks. Oh, yeah. Okay. Okay. You were first. Yeah. So the aim is maybe repeat the question. Oh, yeah, sure. So if I understood correctly, it was about using tab for multiple selection. Okay. So at the moment, most of what happens is hardcoded. But I left many options for configurations. So what I did now is using associated bones. There is, among the options, you have which widgets is associated with a control and which controls are associated with that widget. It's kind of weird. And the reason is all these gizmos must be properties of the bones themselves as they are implemented now. So one widget must belong to one bone. That's how they are designed. When I started to link widgets to multiple bones, what I did was adding an additional property where you can have like friend bones. So one bone has the widgets. In that case, the torso is the owner of the widget. And then you can associate other bones to be friend of the torso. And the tab key will allow you to switch between them. Same with the foot. The I key foot is the owner of that widget. And the heel and spine are friends of the foot. And that's why tab can loop among them. So that's how it works now. It's a tentative solution because I would like to have that wonderful note graph, I hope, that will allow to have a more egalitarian asignation assignment of the widgets. Does that answer your question? Well, at the moment, no. But that can be done. The overall idea is that the last resort is writing some Python code to implement some advanced behavior. In theory, you could have a modifier key that allows you to send emails when you select the head. So the idea is making it as flexible as possible. Okay. So, oh, yes, please. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So the question is, is it mandatory that it is an overlay of the character model? Or can they be independent widgets head up displays showing on the screen? So the answer is yes, you can have independent widgets. It is something that I have done, but I have removed them because I couldn't focus on both tasks. But the intended use of gizmos is head up display widgets. The weird use of gizmos is making them overlay system for your character. So, yeah, that was intended from the beginning. And that's more of the natural use of gizmos as they were intended in the first place. Oh, hi. Sorry. Okay. So the question is how computationally expensive this is and if it requires powerful computer. Okay. Okay. I look for the vertex group of the deformer bones. So what I do is I look into the rig, find the control, then find the deformation bone that is controlled by that shape. And I picked that as the vertex group that will be used to do the gizmo. But the vertex group can be changed. So that was a problem on occasions because sometimes you don't have clean waiting. Like you have some vertices from the wrist or even the forearm who have weak assignment to the hand, for instance. My first solution for that was adding a threshold. So only weights from 03 upwards are considered. And still you can add a different vertex weight. You can set different vertex weights, sorry, different vertex groups for that gizmo. It's something that can be configured. Hello. Not yet. That's not possible. That's one of the intrinsic limitation of that system. Gizmos are only aware of what happens once the gizmo has been clicked. So it is not possible to have a rectangle selection inside the logic of the gizmo. But gizmos don't take that away. So rectangle selection will work as usual. And once you have selected your controls as you always did, you will see the highlight on the selected gizmos. Okay. We don't have to do this right now. You can just find me around. There is still time left. Thank you a lot.


Live from the San Jose Convention Center, extracting the signal from the noise. It's theCUBE, covering Hadoop Summit 2015. Brought to you by headline sponsor, Hortonworks, and by EMC, Pivotal, IBM, Pentaho, Teradata, Synxort, and by Atunity, WAN Disco. Hey, welcome back everyone. This is our final wrap up of Hadoop Summit. They're breaking down. They're going to have to steal the chairs while we're still live on the air or pull the plug. Whichever one comes first, we've had that done before at Oracle Open World. This is theCUBE final wrap up of Hadoop Summit 2015. Just three days of wall-to-wall coverage. I'm John Furrier, George Gilbert, and Jeff Frick. So guys, what a great show. I mean, it's the coming together of cloud, analytics, all doing great stuff. And also more importantly, we had amazing guests on the show. We had a great social community. We had an amazing set of guests. We had Ariana here. We had the whole team working in concert. And we're super excited to come down on the ground here. And you know what? Just want to just say a shout out to our sponsor. We would not be able to do this at the kind of pace that we do 70 plus events a year.  No story's too small. We will go out there. We will get all the action and share that with you. We love doing it. It's a lot of work. We don't mind putting the effort in, but it wasn't for our sponsors. We would not be able to do that. It would sponsor our efforts who are in our community and it could help us bring more community. It's Hortonworks, EMC. Wendisco, Syncsort, IBM. You name it, they're all there. Teradata, Impetus, Pentaho, they're all there. And I missed one. I can't read that. Pivotal. Pivotal. Kyvus Insights, a new sponsor for theCUBE. We haven't had them before. It's fantastic. If you like theCUBE and you want to help us out, be a sponsor and we love it. And we just want to do more and more. Every dialogue that we make with sponsors is we pour right back into the team and continue to grow and do our best to add more and more value and share that. Whether it's social media, Twitter cards, photos, crowd chats, you name it, we do our best. So thanks to the sponsors. All right, guys, analysis of the wrap up. I'll give you my take and then we'll go around the horn. One, Hadoop is ready for prime time. He's continuing to grow. I think Gartner's survey is under forecasting. I think they say half glass, I feel, but I think that's just playing it right down the line. Mervageon did a great job. I think he's really accurate in what he thinks where the market is, trough of disillusionment, but it's going to be big. I think a lot more than 50% are looking at Hadoop. Hadoop is growing. That being said, there's a world bigger than Hadoop, and that really is a subtext to the show here, that besides Hadoop, there's other things going on. Spark had an undercurrent throughout the show. That's interesting. Also we had cloud. We talked about the cloud. We had a lot of people validating our thesis that the systems of intelligence, this next level of analytics, real time streaming will all be powered by the disruption of the cloud, certainly in the enterprise. So I think this is a great time, and the energy was here. Tons of attendees, more and more customers. So I think it's very healthy, and Hortonworks has done an amazing job of staying really clear on their mission, not wavering standard business model. They're still losing money, but they're clearly going for the bigger, going home. So we'll see how that turns out. George, what's your take and what do you think? So one thing that keeps coming back is really this issue of innovation on one hand and the potential for complexity on the other. And I think ODP, sometimes we get competitors bad-mouthing it. The people within it haven't always done it, haven't always done it justice by describing it, which is really the Apache Software Foundation has done an amazing job in incubating and releasing individual projects. But when you get to a Hadoop product, it's really an ecosystem, not a product. And so we needed something that starts to unify all those individual components. And ODP is a very important first step in that. It doesn't take care of the whole thing. It's just about four core elements right now, whereas a Hadoop distro has somewhere between 17 and 24. But Hadoop, in addition to having the core ODP, they have to start wrapping tools, administrative tools around it so that mere mortals can get it running. Or we see cloud options like Microsoft with HD Insight, which wraps its own tooling around it. Part of the reason I think we see a lot of interest sort of under the radar in Spark is it's a very simple paradigm where it has one engine as opposed to many different engines and many different interfaces. One engine, multiple personalities. Is Spark ready for prime time in your mind? It's getting a lot of hype. That's good, but I mean, a lot of people are saying it's not ready. Not, it's probably a fair to say it hasn't gone through the hardening process that most of Hadoop has gone through for the enterprise, but that means ISVs can start building tools on top of it. And I think we're seeing them do that, especially because they can support both Hadoop components and Spark and we'll see them sort of migrate more and more over time towards Spark. Yeah, it's interesting. We'll be at Spark Summit next week, so we'll go and firsthand bring the latest update, which we're excited, but I think it's an interesting point, George, that you bring up. Everyone loves open source for the speed of innovation. You just cannot compete with an entire engaged community as an individual company. At the other hand, as you've said, it's got to be hard and it's got to be enterprise ready and enterprises are happy to pay money to have support for their products and they don't want too much complexity. I think one of the guys said today, complexity kills, so it's this interesting juxtaposition to bring Hadoop in, but then bring it into a way that's sustainable in the enterprise and make an enterprise grade ready. I want to ask you, John, you've been coming to these for a while. How do you see kind of the transformation of the Hadoop ecosystem in general and this show specifically as we've been here for like the last four years? I think, I mean, Jeff, it's a good question. I think the thing I see most is just the evolution of the maturity. You know, I saw some folks last night that I haven't seen in a while that were early cloud-era employees, early Hortonworks employees, they're moving on to bigger and better things to do in startups that are getting promoted. People are really growing. So you're seeing an industry. We always said that Dave Vellante was here. We always talk about this when we say, this is an industry at birth four years ago, five years ago. And what's happened is because we've been in president creation, we've seen the evolution. We've talked to everyone. We know the nuances. So we've been kind of seeing the grass grow, right? It's been fun to watch. And now more importantly, as it crosses over as an industry, still a lot more work to do with customers. And I think that's the key thing. The most thing that I would take away from here is it has crossed the, as an industry, we can cheerlead for ourselves and say, hey, you know, we did great, but still the game's not over. Customers don't see it that way. I think that's why I use that analogy of the ball's in the water, take it out, put it in the drop area, hit it on the green. And that's, I think that's when, you know, the golf analogies is about getting the customers up and running in a very easy way. When you start seeing IBM, HP, Oracle, these kinds of players with big purchasing power, pricing power, market power, embrace this, you know it's real. So that's great. The next step's going to be competition. That's when it's going to be really exciting. You know, the Hortonworks, Cloudera thing, as much as the bickering's going on between the two, is a legitimate, you know, stair down competition. It's a Mexican standoff. It's chicken on the train tracks. It's who is going to make it. It's going to be really interesting to watch because enterprise is going to want standardization. So someone has to be a software vendor, someone has to be a standard vendor. So I think that's kind of playing out and we'll see how that goes.  And as I think you said, it's not just about Hadoop, a lot of action on SQL on Hadoop, you know, embracing the broader ecosystem and really connecting Hadoop to the other existing systems of record, system of engagement. What's our other third system, George? And the systems of intelligence that the adults have. To really get a one plus one makes three effect. Yeah. Last thoughts, George. I would say that. Before they roll us out of here. Unlike the era where we saw Oracle and IBM and ultimately Microsoft built huge businesses on the foundation of SQL databases, I don't think we're going to see necessarily huge businesses built on a pure Hadoop platform. One, because it's open source and basically what people are going to be paying for support relationships. What we're more likely to see are the big applications being built on top of that. I'm not sure we know exactly what those are going to look like, but I would say our visitor from Bloomberg is probably more someone who's going to be the prototype where they can take a Hadoop extended foundation and build a big business on top of that. I think, Jeff, the thing to me, is this is all about wrapping up the show. And I think the thing that I would say is the battle ground for the data will be number one. I think EMC's got a huge opportunity just to get out of the way and store everything. And they have a software play up to the top of the stack, but the DevOps coming in, that EMC is an opportunity to be a nice layer so that data can move and have data portability across the various platforms. So I think that's a good opportunity. Obviously, Gordon works. And I just think in general, this is an opportunity for everyone right now. I think we are going to look at massive change and if you're not talking about real time, fully asynchronous API kind of support, notification economy kind of thing we're talking about, this is where the apps are. 360 degree view of the customer, it's got to be real time. It can't be near real time. So these are the kinds of data challenges in that's cutting edge. On the other end of the spectrum, it's the boring but important data governance security.  So that's boring, but really crucial that the foundation and the set. So you've got to be bleeding edge and stable. So I think everything in between is up for grabs. And then you add all flash and do it because we go to hardware shows too. And you think about the computing power too. Again, under the covers, drive this thing and then cloud distribution, really exciting times. Okay, guys, thanks so much. Great show, thanks. Shout out to the crew here. Leonard, Patrick, Greg, Ariana who's doing the social, all the team back at the ranch. You know, Matt, all the Mick, everybody, Andrew, Dave, Vellante watching from Boston. Good to see you out there, Dave, Tweet, some stuff. We've got a lot of stuff coming up. We've got the next couple of shows. We've got DockerCon, we've got IBM Spark, Spark Summit, DockerCon, Red Hat Summit. Go to silkenangle.tv to find all the action and all the schedule. So again, silkenangle.com, wikibon.com, silkenangle.tv, and of course, go to crowdchat.net to join the conversation. This is a wrap from Hadoop Summit 2015, The Cube. We're out, see you next time.


��  anthrop Is a biotec factor, ƒ' mщer ƒ' mщer ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher ƒ' msher is the amount of diffused water that is present in air in the form of water vapors that may be present in soil నికినికిచాసింోаждందిరార్ల్. So students, if we talk about moisture, one thing is water, one thing is water, water is aquatic life. The water in terrestrial environment is usually the water that is in the form of vapors. Or less diluted form, diffused form is present in the soil, in which the soil is in the form of moisture or wet form. So moisture typically is water vapors that are present in the air. Or that water is a very limited amount that is mixed up with the soil. And it is provided with a little bit of salt or moisture. Or it may be present at the surfaces. Different surfaces such as plants, logs or other things, stones or rocks. If we look at it, we will see that the layers of water that will be called as the moisture. So normally the amount of moisture or amount of water vapors present in the air is also called as the humidity. So typically the moisture that is present in the air is also called as the humidity. So in the ecosystem, the amount of moisture is very important for the animals. In the ecosystem of animals, the amount of moisture is very important because if there is more moisture in the environment, there will be less water loss from the body of animal. If there is more moisture in the environment, then the water loss of the animals will be less. Similarly if the moisture is present in the reduced amount of the environment, then in this case the water loss of the animals will increase. So more moisture means less water loss from the animal body. And less moisture means more water loss from the bodies of animals. So it means the moisture is directly related to the animals. So if we look at what are the different methods by which the animals gain their water from the environment. If animals can gain their water from the environment, then normally the animals gain water from the environment along with the food. The food we take mostly from the food contents which are enriched with water. Some of the food contents in which more than 90% of the water is present. So it means what we eat, it also has the water along with it. The second thing is the drinking. The second source for water intake is the drinking. Because what we drink is directly water intake. Third source of water in animals is the metabolic water. Because whenever the bodies are in the bodies of animals, there are many animals when they eat different types of food materials. When the food materials are oxidized in the body, then the water becomes a by-product. There are many animals who survive throughout life on this by-product or metabolic water. In desert animals, there are very small desert animals who survive. So what are the laws of water from the animal bodies? The water loss of the animal's bodies, there are different methods through which the water is being lost. Number one is the urination. To release the nitrogen waste from the body, the urine carries a large amount of water. Normally for 1 gram of urea, the urea we release from the body, it requires about 50 ml of water. So 50 ml of water is released. Second is the feces. The defecation of our digested waste, which we eat, which is released from the body, that also carries a sufficient amount of water along with it. So this is the second law of water. The third one is the water loss during the gaseous exchange. Normally when we exhale, during the exhaling, the air coming out, the air coming out of our breath, the water content is maximum, the saturated amount of water is present with the water vapors. So this is another major law of the water from the animal bodies. And the last one is the evaporative cooling. When there is a perspiration or the water evaporates from the skin, the water loss will be there. So these are the major water loss in the animals. So now the question arises that when animals are living in a terrestrial environment. In terrestrial environments, when there are animals, they have to save their water. Especially there are many animals like insects, birds, which have a reduced amount of water supply. In terrestrial animals, they have a reduced amount of water supply. So if the water loss is more than their body, they will not be able to survive. In such cases, the animals have certain measures. In animals, nature has some adaptations through which they can save their water. They can conserve their water in their body. Number one is the fecal material. Usually, if the reduced amount of water supply is present, then the fecal material will be dry. So the water loss will be reduced through the feces. The second one is the concentrated urine. The urine is concentrated. For example, if we look at normal humans, our urine is about 8 times more concentrated. But there are desert animals in which the urine is up to 40 times concentrated. That means, there is a possibility of reabsorbing the water in them. So if the urine is concentrated, then the water loss will be reduced. Then some animals also have adaptations that they can change the nature of nitrogen waste. For example, if the insects have a reduced amount of water supply, then instead of urea in them, uric acid is present as an excretory product. Because the amount of water for uric acid is very low for their excretion. So in the face of uric acid paste, the dry form can be released. The other adaptations are the behavioral adaptations. Animals can conserve their water in their body to change their behavior. Change their behavior means that they become nocturnal. At night time, because the humidity is high, the temperature is reduced and the water loss is low, then they become nocturnal. The nocturnal means that they are active at night time. Some animals have ability to store large amount of water in their body. For example, a camel has the ability to store large amount of water in its body. So the water regulation in aquatic animals. In aquatic animals, there are two types of aquatic animals. They are the freshwater animals and the marine animals. In freshwater animals, there is no water loss issue. Because there is a lot of water in freshwater animals. There is already water available. So they are conserving the salts. While in their case, marine animals. Since marine animals live in a hypertonic environment, they have strategies to save their water. For example, they will drink a lot of water. They will drink a lot of water. And they have the ability to secrete the salts. So they can remove the salts from the body. So these are different methods by which animals have the ability to maintain the water level in their body.


The first item of business this afternoon is Time for Reflection, and our Time for Reflection leader today is Reverend Canon Sarah Shaw, Christchurch Falkirk. Presiding Officer, Members of the Scottish Parliament, it is a great honour for me to be here today and to be able to address you in person, not remotely or as a hologram or something. In the Easter season, Christians celebrate this, that God made us for life, not death. A new and eternal life for all people is made possible through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. But Easter shouldn't be thought of as a one-off or past event, but as a way of understanding our world and God's action in our world. The hope of resurrection is God's hope, not to be owned or appropriated by some, but is God's will for the whole world. And we see signs of it all the time, even in the midst of the horror we may feel at the darkness of our world and in such troubling times that we are in. The events of that first Easter were extraordinary, and they tell us all we need to know about God's will for creation and for all people. God was saying then and says to us now, you may be anxious or afraid, but be assured fear and violence and pain and sickness and even death will not have the last word. I think of Geoffrey Stuttgart Kennedy, known as Woodbine Willie, the Anglican priest and poet. He was a chaplain to soldiers during World War I on the Western Front. He wrote of the terrible things he saw first hand yet. At the same time, he knew that through the cross and resurrection of Christ, God had overcome all of that. These clouds are lies, he wrote. The blue sky is the truth. Does that seem like wishful thinking? Perhaps until we reconsider that resurrection miracles happen every day when someone forgives another person and a broken relationship is restored. When people open their homes to refugees they've never met because it's the right thing to do. When in spite of rising pressure on household bills people reach out with generosity to others in need. And when those who are in a position of power and influence speak out or take action against what would be the popular or the expedient thing. These are resurrection miracles. Resurrection wasn't and isn't a one-off event but a way of life and a hopeful calling for all of us.


Welcome, geometry students, as we work with the converse of the Pythagorean theorem once again. Have your paper and pencil ready and follow along? The first part is to answer the question, is it a triangle? Our triangle has three side lengths, four and four and eight. We're going to compare the two shortest sides, four and four, add them together, and we get a sum of eight. We compare that to the third side, which is also eight. So we find that the two side lengths together do not add up to more than the third side. Eight is not greater than eight, so you can write the greater than symbol with a slash through it, which means not greater than. So if the two shorter sides are not bigger than the third side, you do not have a triangle, which is great. You can simply answer it with not a triangle, and you don't even have to do part b. You can't classify it if it is not a triangle. So to quickly review, we took these two shorter sides, four and four, and we compared them to the third side. So four and four added up to eight, not greater than the third side, eight, not a triangle.


We continue today with the workbook of Course in Miracles. What is sin? Sin is insanity. It is the means by which the mind is driven mad and seeks to let illusions take the place of truth. And being mad, it sees illusions where the truth should be and where it really is. Sin gave the body eyes. For what is there the sinless would behold? What need have they of sights or sounds or touch? What would they hear or reach to grasp? What would they sense at all? To sense is not to know. And truth can be but filled with knowledge and with nothing else. The body is the instrument the mind made in its efforts to deceive itself. Its purpose is to strive. Yet can the goal of striving change? And now the body serves a different aim for striving. What it seeks for now is chosen by the aim the mind has taken as replacement for the goal of self-deception. Truth can be its aim as well as lies. The senses then will seek instead for witnesses to what is true. Sin is the home of all illusions which but stand for things imagined issuing from thoughts that are untrue. They are the, quote, proof that what has no reality is real. Sin, quote, proves God's Son is evil. Timelessness must have an end. Eternal life must die. And God himself has lost the Son he loves with but corruption to complete himself. His will forever overcome by death. Love slain by hate and peace to be no more. A madman's dreams are frightening and sin appears indeed to terrify. And yet what sin perceives is but a childish game. The Son of God may play he has become a body prey to evil and to guilt with but a little life that ends in death. But all the while his Father shines on him and loves him with an everlasting love which his pretenses cannot change at all. How long, O Son of God, will you maintain the game of sin? Shall we not put away the sharp-edged children's toys? How soon will you be ready to come home? Perhaps today? There is no sin. Creation is unchanged. Would you still hold return to heaven back? How long, O Holy Son of God, how long? And we continue with lesson 251. I am in need of nothing but the truth. I sought for many things and found despair. Now do I seek but one. For in that one is all I need and only what I need. All that I sought before I needed not and did not even want. My only need I did not recognize. But now I see that I need only truth. In that all needs are satisfied, all cravings end, all hopes are finally fulfilled and dreams are gone. Now have I everything that I could need, now have I everything that I could want and now at last I find myself at peace and for that peace our Father we give thanks. What we denied ourselves you have restored and only that is what we really want. Amen.


Okay, welcome back class, we are in class 23. We've seen so far that Paul is brought to Caesarea under Governor Felix. There is an accusation against him that two things, one is that he caused dissension among the people in Jerusalem, the Jews particularly and also that he filed the temple and then you had the difference of all where he described his work as you know a work which he is doing for God and he's just being faithful to what the scriptures have said about you know the hope that we have God and you know the reality of resurrection. So now for the people who were listening to him, even High Priest, the resurrection of the dead was not a foreign God because even if you go back to the earliest book of the Bible, Job in chronology when you read, Job did say you know at one point that one day I'm going to stand before God, one day I will I will face my God. So even Job, you see how powerful this is, the Spirit of God had given him a revelation about resurrection and even in the book of Job there is this belief that one day we are going to rise from the dead. So keeping all this in mind, bearing this in mind and knowing that his audience which would be the High Priest, the elders and he also had faith, they all knew about this. So Paul's simple issue was like what is wrong, don't we all believe this and that's what I'm saying, I believe in resurrection and I didn't cause any dissension among the Jews. So if the governor was sincere man, this would have been sufficient to end the trial of Paul, you know, telling them and Paul could have gone on on his missionary journey. So where are we as far as time is concerned, we said that Paul completed his third missionary journey around 58 AD. So 58 AD is when this whole issue happens in Jerusalem, the temple area of Jerusalem and he's brought to Caesarea. So he is with Felix right now and at 58 AD, you know, this should have ended, the trial should have ended but because Felix was not a sincere and a faithful officer, it just drags. So we'll notice that it goes on to about 60 AD, two years under the custody of Felix. Felix is sitting on the fence, not making a decision. Even earlier, he did not want to make a decision. So that's why he said, oh, you are from Cilicia. So why did he say you're from Cilicia? That comes under the governance of Felix. Now if Paul was from another city, Felix would have said, this is not part of my duty. I will just wait for another leader to come and judge the case. But because Felix had to oversee this case and Paul was from Cilicia, he just went with the motions and did some activities but he never really intended to bring a resolution for this matter. So we are at verse 22 of Acts 24. So can we have a volunteer verse 22 to verse 27? When Felix heard these things having more accurate knowledge of the way, he adjourned the proceedings and said, when Lysius, the commander comes down, I will make a decision on your case. So he commanded the centurion to keep Paul and let him have liberty and told him not to forbid any of his friends to provide for or visit him. And after some days when Felix came with his wife, Cilia, who was Jewish, he sent for Paul and heard him concerning the faith in Christ. Now as he reasoned about righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come, Felix was afraid and answered, go away for now when I have convenient time to recall for you. Meanwhile, he also hoped that money would be given by Paul, that he might release him. Therefore, he sent for him more often and conversed with him. But after two years, Osius Fescus succeeded Felix and Felix wanting to do the Jews a favor, left Paul bound. Thank you, Christopher. Thank you for reading. As we look at what is happening, it is really a fulfillment of God's promise to Paul because I think it was in Acts chapter 9 and verse 15, could somebody read what God had commissioned him to do? Acts 9 verse 15. But the Lord said to him, go for, he is a chosen vessel for mine to bear my name before Gentiles, kings and the children of Israel. Yes. Yes. Thank you. Thank you Abishak. So we see that God had a purpose and as Paul is joining with the direction of the Holy Spirit, the purpose is being fulfilled. We must recognize that all this is not happening outside of the great plan of God for Paul's life and ministry. It's quite clear, isn't it? What did God say? He is my chosen vessel. He is my chosen vessel to the Gentiles. He is my chosen vessel to minister before kings. That's exactly what's happening. Okay. So Felix, he is a Gentile governor. Why, how do we know that he is Gentile governor? Because in this passage, we saw that he after some days brings his wife to Silla who was Jewish. So he was not Jewish. His wife was Jewish and since Paul is, you know, still hanging around and Felix has not made a decision, he just brings Drusilla to, you know, like, okay, meet this person, Paul and all his strange teachings and all that. So he brings her over. But Paul never misses an opportunity. See, he's in the prison. Yes, he definitely in the prison, but prison is an opportunity. Jerusalem, the conflict, the mob violence is an opportunity. Everything is an opportunity for the one who is called. So even now, he can minister to Felix and Drusilla. He already shared, you know, about the hope which he has in God earlier. He addresses some other issues or matters when Felix has made Drusilla come. What are these? Verse 25 says he reads about righteousness, self-control and judgment to come. Why did he pick these three subjects to talk to Felix and Drusilla? Why not other subjects, right, about salvation? The context is something like Drusilla was somebody else's wife and Felix had sort of, you know, enticed her and all that and she had come away from her husband. So she was not officially, she was still officially married while Felix decided to, you know, have her and he married her. And so it was not a morally right thing which Felix did and Paul having this in his mind knew that Felix needed to repent of many things, of his corruption, of, you know, his insincerity as an authority figure. But in addition to that, his relationship with Drusilla and so that's why he talks about righteousness, self-control, judgment to come. He's being very clear, you know, as far as the gospel is concerned, as far as, you know, God's holiness is concerned and walk of righteousness is concerned and Felix doesn't like it. So we are told in verse 25 itself Felix was afraid and answered, go away for now. When I have a convenient time, I will call for you. You know, the Bible very beautifully puts it even when you look at Hebrews, it says, today is the day of salvation. You know, salvation is never something which we should put away as far as possible. You know, if we are able to bring people to that place of decision and when I say bring people, I'm not saying hook or crook, led by the Holy Spirit, you know, like for example Paul preached, sorry, Peter preached on the day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit was poured out and 3000 people got saved the very same day.  And he led them to salvation. They were baptized on the same day. So when we share the gospel of the Lord Jesus, we must expect that today people will turn to Christ. Don't wait for tomorrow. Look at Felix, how sad to hear what he said. When I have a convenient time, what is a convenient time to respond to the truth of the gospel? Do we need a convenient time to respond to the truth of the gospel? So, you know, as a minister of God, I'm sure Paul did his best to share the gospel as clearly with conviction as possible. And it was Felix's turn and his choice to respond to it. But unfortunately, though Paul did his part speaking to Kings, God had said, so Governor Felix, he had the opportunity to share and his wife, but Felix was the one and his response was very cold, maybe not cold, but he was just afraid and convicted that what he had done was not right in the first place. Okay. And so Felix never made a decision for Christ. He just said, when I have a convenient time, I will call you. And verse 26, meanwhile, he also hoped that money would be given him by Paul. Remember, I mentioned this to us, he was corrupt. So that's why he's dragging the issue that he might release him. Therefore, he sent for him more often and conversed with him. So Felix was talking to him on and off, not with the intention of knowing about God, but more with the intention of, okay, if I keep chatting with this person, maybe he will give me some money. And with that, I can, I can let him go. So it wasn't a pleasant thing that was going on. But the beauty of this is that Paul being under custody verse 23 says, Felix knew that he's an innocent man. And that is why he had told the Centurion to keep Paul and to let him have liberty and told him not to forbid any of his friends to provide for or visit him. So our understanding is Paul is in the prison. He is under pressure because he's going through a trial, but active ministry would have been happening even in the prison of Caesarea. Okay. Obviously, because Paul had the liberty. Yeah, he's not traveling here and there, but I'm sure his friends, many friends would have come. He would have taught the Bible, taught the word of God and equip will continue to serve in the, in the ministry of God, but not physically exerting himself the way he exerted in the first three missionary journeys. So the last verse of this chapter says, after two years, Porsche's Festus succeeded Felix. So now there was an automatic change of authority. So from Felix, another Gentile ruler or governor was put in place by the name of Festus. Okay. And Felix, when he left, he knew Paul was innocent. So that's why he could have taken the money and let him go. But since Paul did not pay him, he thought, okay, I might as well do the Jews a favor. The Jews hated Paul, right? They just hated him. And so he thought, if I keep him in prison, I'll have a good name among the Jews. And that's what he did. He left him under custody. So let's jump now to Acts 25 and see what happens under Festus. Okay. So Abishek, would you be able to read from verse one to 12? Yes, sure, Pastor. Yeah, go ahead. Chapter 25. Now when Festus had come to the province, after three days, he went up from Caesarea to Jerusalem. Then the high priest and the chief man of the Jews informed him against Paul and they petitioned him, asking a favor against him that he would summon him to Jerusalem while they lay in ambush along the road to kill him. But Festus answered that Paul should be kept at Caesarea and that he himself was going there shortly. Therefore, he said, let those who have authority among you go down with me and accuse this man to see if there is any fault in him. And when he had remained among them more than 10 days, he went down to Caesarea and the next day, sitting on the judgment seat, he commanded Paul to be brought. And when he had come, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood about and laid many serious complaints against Paul, which they could not prove while he answered for himself, neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar. Have I offended in anything at all? But Festus wanting to do the Jews a favor, answered Paul and said, are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and there be judge before me concerning this thing? So Paul said, I stand at Caesar judgment seat, where I ought to be judged. To the Jews, I have done no wrong, as you very well know. For if I am an offender or have committed anything deserving of death, I do not object to dying. But if there is nothing in this thing of which this man accused me, no can deliver me to them. I appeal to Caesar. Then Festus, when he had conferred with the council answer, you have appealed to Caesar. To Caesar, you shall go. Amen. Thank you, Abhishek for reading that. So once again, Paul's trial continues. So who is Festus? I mentioned he is again a Gentile governor. And he seems to be a very proactive, energetic governor and likely to be a sincere personality as well. So as soon as he became the governor, what did he do? After three days, he went up from Caesarea to Jerusalem. So he's quite enthusiastic about his tasks and assignments. He wants to bring a conclusion to this matter of Paul's accusation. So he goes to Jerusalem. Over there, he finds that even after two years, can you imagine two years have passed by and we would think that in two years, people will calm down, isn't it? They hated Paul, but in two years, maybe they will not react with the kind of fury that they had two years ago. But somehow the high priest and the chief men of the Jews informed him against Paul and they petitioned him. So they never forgot about Paul and the entire time they are waiting to get him. So as soon as the leadership changed, they thought, okay, let's get favor from Festus and we'll even kill him. We'll figure out a way. We'll tell him you bring this man, Paul, to Jerusalem and on the way, let's just kill Paul and we are done with Paul. But maybe it was intuition or his sincerity to his conscience, you could say, because we don't know what kind of faith he had. Maybe just his conscience that he wanted to do the right thing and he figured out that something is off. If I bring Paul here, I don't know what's going to happen to him. So how about calling these leaders to Caesarea and let's talk, let's discuss and conclude about Paul. So he invites them, he says that those who have authority among you go down with me and accuse this man to see if there is any fault in him. So that's what he does. He comes to Caesarea after 10 days. So this is all like quickly, quickly he's trying to do it. He's not dragging like Felix. So after 10 days, he comes, he's on the judgment seat and he asks, okay, what are the accusations against Paul and they start charging him. Serious complaints, none of which they could actually prove. It really challenges us as believers. It challenges us as ministers of God that having so many people in authority, what are they all doing for two years plus trying to search. Okay, what did this guy do that we can nail him with that but they're not finding anything. So how did he live his life? It's amazing. It's amazing. No wonder he stated my conscience is clear. It's clear before God. It's clear before man. So he did the best he knew to walk in the righteous path and how boldly, I don't know how many people could claim what Paul actually said. I'll just read out his statement verse eight. He says, neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar, by offended in anything at all. So he says to the religious people or to the law holders of the land, nobody, I've done nothing. I'm not offended anyone. So I don't know what all this is about. So anyway, Festus with his intention to solve the problem, he's like, okay, whatever it is, we've got to figure this out. It's dragging too long. So he gives him an option and he says, are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and there be judge before me concerning these things? So he was like, okay, why not try what the Jews suggested? Let's all go to Jerusalem. And at that moment, Paul knew that you see how he's trying to escape death. It's just wisdom. If we can avoid persecution and opposition and, you know, death due to persecution, why not avoid it? So he's trying to avoid it. He's not walking into the mouth of the lion anywhere, isn't it? So that's also something we can keep in mind when we serve God, when we do ministry, we work in such a way that we don't bring, we don't raise opposition against us. That is one. If we can escape the opposition, why not? So he's trying to escape it. If I go to Jerusalem, definitely, it's going to be a bad scene. So his wisdom, of course, he's a learned man, right? He knows the law of the land. So he says, you know what, just stop your discussions and your effort to solve the matter.  Now, this is again, really amazing. See, we've got to know the laws of the land. Paul knew it. He knew, okay, what does, what does do the laws offer me? And he makes use of it. For a Roman citizen, if a case was not decided among the leaders, he could directly appeal to the highest authority, you know, something like today, we would equate it to the Supreme Court of our nation. So he thought, okay, let's just go to Caesar. Enough is enough. And he appeals to Caesar. And the moment he appeals to Caesar, him being a Roman citizen, Pester says, okay, you have appealed to Caesar, to Caesar, you shall go. The decision is made. Pester is not going to preside over this case. Okay, so we'll lead on from verse 13 and see who else comes to visit Paul. But in the meantime, I think Shri Kuppar has a question. Yes, Pastor. I want to know, as you said, Paul was trying to use his wisdom to avoid the death. Now, he could have stopped himself when the prophets are so many times prophesied, you know, prophesied, this is going to happen. So that time itself, he could have took a wise decision rather than getting into such a big problem and trying to escape. So that was my question. Why, what was the reason behind it? Why then the Paul, Paul could have taken that step when two, three times, even if somebody says the prophets comes and says to someone, especially today, that there is a danger if you go ahead and you know, you will take a decision immediately. But rather than he just moved ahead and, you know, he took all the decisions and now why he wants to escape from the dead. Thank you, Pastor. That's good. Sure. Thank you, Shri Kumar. A very, you know, interesting question. Knowing what is coming your way, why couldn't have Paul have escaped it initially then? So, see, we have to weigh between the assignment and the trials. Okay. So in this situation, yes, there were trials and if Paul really wanted, he could have escaped them. But he also has to look at his future with his assignment in mind. God had an assignment for him, right? We saw, like how Acts 915 said that he is my chosen vessel. He is going to stand, he is going to minister to the gentiles, you know, to people in authority. God had already spoken that over his life. So, Paul while weighing the fact that there will be trials and there will also be my assignments, he recognized that in the trial is also my assignment. I will have opportunities to preach Christ. Remember, he preached Christ to the Sanhedrin, at least, you know, began to the Sanhedrin and then Felix and Rusila and now Festus and then you'll have other people as audience and now he's saying, I want to go to Caesar. So, these people, it's so interesting that Jesus died in that region, you know, roughly about 30 years ago. They have no idea who this Jesus is. So, there is a world that did not know Christ and God was giving opportunity to Paul to share Christ. That he did not want to miss. Okay, so, Shikuma doesn't make sense. Like, we've got to look at the assignment and opportunity and move with that. And if trials come along, those are kind of unavoidable. But then, if there are trials outside of our kind of, you know, direct opportunity and assignment, yes, we can always take a detour and keep ourselves safe. So, that's what I would say. And to support this, I'm able to think of one scripture, I think it's Philippines 312 where, you know, Paul says that I'm living for that, for which Christ Jesus has taken a hold of me. So, there is a reason or an assignment for which, life assignment for which Christ Jesus called Paul. How can you abandon that to be safe? And what's the fun, you know, being saved when you're not living why you were created? Thank you, Pastor. Thank you. You're right, actually. Thank you. Oh, sure. Thank you. Any other comments from others? Okay. So, maybe something for us to think about. Wherever possible, Paul did consciously avoid persecution. Let's read now from verse 30. We could read all the way till verse 27. So, anyone else also ready to do this marathon reading? Okay, any takers? Plaster from where to where? Okay. Yeah. So, the passage is from Acts 25, verses 13 through 27. Shikumar, can we let Susan read it? Because I think you read one section. Yeah. Susan, you could go, please. Okay, man. Yeah. And after certain days, King Agrippa and Bernice came into Caesarea to salute Festus. And when they had been there many days, Festus declared Paul's cause unto the king saying, There is a certain man left in bonds by Phoenix, about whom? When I was at Jerusalem, the chief priest and the elders of the Jews informed me, desiring to have judgment against him. To whom I answered, it is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die. Before that, he which is accused, have the accusers face to face and have license to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him. Therefore, when they will come there, when they will come here without any delay on the moral moral, I sat on the judgment seat and commanded the man to be brought forth against whom when the accusers stood up, they brought none accusation of such things as I supposed, but had certain questions against him of their own superstition and of one Jesus, which was dead whom Paul affirmed to be alive. And because I doubted of such manner of questions, I asked him whether he would go to Jerusalem and there he judged of these matters. But when Paul had appealed to be reserved unto the hearing of Augustus, I commanded him to be kept till I might send him to Caesar. Then Agrippa said unto Festus, I would also hear the man myself. Tomorrow, said he, you shall hear him. And on the morrow, when Agrippa was come and bedridden with great pomp and was entered into the place of hearing with the chief captains and principal men of the city at Festus commandment, Paul was brought forth. And Festus said, King Agrippa and all men which are here present with us, you see this man about whom all the multitude of the Jews have dealt with me both in Jerusalem and also here crying that he ought not to live any longer.  Therefore, I have brought him forth before you and specially before you, O King Agrippa, that after examination had I might have somewhat to write for it seems to me unreasonable to send the prisoner and not indicate the crimes laid against him. Thank you, Susan. Thank you for reading that rather long section there. So, here we have the introduction of another individual. This is Agrippa and King Agrippa. So, they were governors, but they were also kings over regions. The important thing about Agrippa is, Agrippa is part of the family of Herod. So, there was a relationship that the Herod family had with Jesus and the believers, his great grandfather, Agrippa's great grandfather was the one who had the three of all like the two-year-old male children to be killed. So, that was his great grandfather. His grandfather was the one who asked for the head of John the Baptist. And his father was the one at 12. We remember that he killed James the then leader of the church. So, he's coming from that dynasty. What can you expect? What decision can you expect from Agrippa II? Agrippa II is the king that we're talking about. So, since he was visiting Caesarea while Festus was there, this was the issue that Festus had. Nothing concrete in this case. There is the accusation of the Jews without any evidence. Paul is saying, no, I am innocent. And Paul has now appealed to Caesar. How do we send him to Caesar without even mentioning what the matter is? Because you see, it's dragged for two years, procrastinating on the decision. Festus is trying to resolve it in a matter of days. But there's nothing to resolve. So, it's kind of shameful. What will the higher authorities think about Festus? If he says, okay, here is the person and there is no charge against him, but he's in prison. Do something. That sounds very unreasonable. And so, he thought, okay, since Agrippa is visiting us, why not present Paul to Agrippa and let's see, let him bring forth the matter and let Agrippa, who's the king, who probably has many cases, give us a judgment. We can go into the letter that we write to Caesar before we send Paul. So, here is the written about Agrippa. So, they decide all this and they say, okay, come on, it's a meet the next day. And he comes with Bernice. Now, there isn't much that Luke is writing about. He didn't write about Brusilla or about Bernice. But here, what's happening is, even Agrippa, he was not upholding the laws of morality in his own community. So, there are rumors that Bernice was his sister. So, it was a sexually immoral relationship. And it was what you call as an incestuous relationship which Agrippa had with Bernice. But since he was the king, everyone was, what can you do? And this was out there in the open and things were just going on as it is. But these were all serious matters. These were all serious matters. However, because of his position, he says, okay, let's meet with Paul. And the next day, we are told that they plan for a gathering in the auditorium. They use words like great pomp. When Agrippa and Bernice had come with great pomp and had entered the auditorium of 23 with the commanders and the prominent men of the city at Festus' Samar, Paul was brought. So, similar, just in time with what Shri Kumar asked us, he said, there are dangers to Paul's life, what is happening. But do you realize that as Paul is going to speak now, he has the audience of two gentile authority figures. There is Governor Festus, King Agrippa, and you also have many other commanders and prominent men of the city. So, it is a fulfillment of what God had promised and said that Paul, he is going to stand before kings and people of authority to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It's like God is giving him the setting. He does not have to go looking for it or searching for it. But the audience is there now. In the auditorium, they're all there. He just has to speak and hopefully through that message, people will turn to Christ. So, that's what happened. And Festus presents the case. He says, King Agrippa in verse 24, and all the men who are here, present with us, you see this man about whom the whole assembly of the Jews petitioned me, but both at Jerusalem and here, crying out that he was not fit to live any longer. But when I found that he had committed nothing deserving of death and that he himself had appealed to Augustus, I decided to send him. So, in his own words, it's sort of contradictory prisoner, but Festus is saying, I didn't find anything wrong with him. Worthy of death. Then later on, he goes to explain that because my examination has not unearthed charges. How about Agrippa hearing him out? And let's see if we have some charges. With those charges, we are going to send Paul. So, this is like a moment Paul is waiting for. He always loves audience. So, he now will take the opportunity to share the Gospel with the people and also recognize that Acts chapter 9, Acts chapter 21 and Acts chapter 26 are passages where we are able to construct the information about this man called Paul. So, many other small details he's going to share here. So, we can sort of concentrate on that as well. So, we need another reader, Acts 26 verses 1 through 11 who would be willing to read the section. Okay. Yes. Okay, Asha, please. So, Agrippa said to Paul, you have permission to speak for yourself. Then Paul stretched out his hand and made his defense. I consider myself fortunate that it is to be for you. King Agrippa, I'm going to make my defense today against all the accusations of the Jews, especially because you are familiar with all the customs and controversies of the Jews. Therefore, I thank you to listen to me patiently. My manner of life from my youth is spent from the beginning among my own nation and in Jerusalem. It is known by all the Jews that they have known for a long time that they are willing to testify that going to defense strictest party of religion, I have lived as a Pharisee. And I stand here on trial because of my home and the promise made by God to our fathers to which our 12 tribes hoped to obtain as they earnestly worshiped in 1998. And for this hope, I'm accused by Jews. Okay. Why is it thought incredibly by any of you that God praises the dead? I myself was convinced that I ought to do many things in opposing the name of Jesus of Nazareth. And I did so in Jerusalem. I not only locked up many of the saints in the prison after receiving authority from the chief priests, but when they were put to death, I cast my vote against them. And I punished them often in all the synagogues and tried to make them blaspheme and and raising fury against them. I persecuted them even to foreign cities upon life there for us. He says that from the youth, he spent the manner of life that he had, he wants to share it with the people beginning among my own nation at Jerusalem, all the Jews know. So how come he's saying Jerusalem when he's actually from Darces of Cilicia? Because as a religious person, he would have come very often to the city of Jerusalem and the other Jews also were aware of who he is. Then he makes a statement like, according to the strictest sect of our religion, I lived a Pharisee, that is to tell us that every small thing he could think of in the traditions and the practices, the beliefs of the Pharisees, he had kept it. He had kept it. So he was a very, very pious and a devoted Pharisee. And he says that now he's being judged. He's also trying to say that what I am working in right now is a fulfillment of what was introduced to me as a Jew and a Pharisee. So that's what he's saying. As he goes on verse 7, he says to this promise, what is this promise? What God had promised to the Jewish people, he is actually working in those things, but yet he is accused, he is accused of believing in something like resurrection. So in verse 8, he says, why shouldn't we be thought incredible by you that God raises the dead? Because he knows that though Ephesus and King Agrippa are from a Gentile background, they are familiar with the beliefs of the Jews and the fact that God is able and God is greater and he's a razor of the dead as well. So he describes himself all these ways and basically he has opposition and then we've understood these things. He's going to recount his conversion. He's going to recount his conversion. What we'll do is instead of me trying to explain it, we'll just give the read. I think that in itself will help us understand, fall back. So from verse 12 to verse 23, another person. Still read, Pastor? Yes, brother. Well, while this occupied, I journeyed to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests. At midday oaking, around the road, I saw a light. I saw a light from heaven, brighter than sun, shining around me and those and then we all had fallen to the ground. I heard a voice speaking to me and saying in people's language, Saul, Saul, why do you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the ghost. So I said, who are you love? And he said, I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. But raise and stand on your feet for I appear to you on this purpose to make you a minister and witness both of the things of which you have seen and the things which I will yet reveal to you. I will deliver you from the Jewish people as well as from the Gentiles to whom I know sending to open their eyes in order to turn them from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified and pray to me. Thank you, brother. Brother, you can also continue. You can read from verse 19 to verse 23. Therefore, King of the report, I was not disobedient to the holy heavenly vision but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem and throughout all the region of Judea and then to the Gentiles that they should repent, turn to God and do works befitting repentance. For these reasons, the Jews see me in the temple and try to fill me, therefore having obtained help from God to this day I stand, witnessing both the small and great, saying no other things than those things which prophets, which prophets and Moses said would come and Christ would suffer and he would be, he would be the first to rise from the bed and would proclaim light to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles. Okay, thank you. So, of course, it's explicitly there, Paul talking about his encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus and he makes it very clear, isn't it? So, he makes it very clear that he heard a voice and now he is actually following the instructions of that voice and the vision that he got. Verse 19 is a very key verse for us where it says, therefore King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision. So, you see his commitment, it's not easy what Paul is doing, being a witness to so many different people but it's all about his commitment. He has given his life for the call, he's given his life for the heavenly vision and he says, I have not been disobedient to the heavenly vision and then he goes on to describe about how his message is regarding repentance, living in people too, repentance. So, we can stop here and I think it's best to just do the remaining chapters in a proper way and you know, close it off in a proper way. We have two and a half chapters left which definitely we can complete. So, let's pray now and I would like to request anyone in the batch to please pray. And we pray, this is Charles. Yes, yes Charles, please. Please pray, Heavenly Father, we thank you so much for what you are teaching us. Lord, we pray that you will continue to give us the ability to put in practice but also to continue to depend on you for any other further explanation where you might have not understood that in the coming days we will be able to radiate your glory as your name is glorified on earth for our good. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. Amen. Thank you Charles. Thank you everyone. God bless you. We shall meet again next week. So, please do join us. See you next week.


And then I mean, this is great way to end it 16 of 25 the captain Derek cheater On the diamond auto get that into a maggot. That is nasty Very nice one there for the inks. Oh, Jase. Oh, Jase. Oh, Jase. All right. Let me just make sure yep That's it. We got the booklet. It is a dual autograph diamond relic book card of Wow Otani and Ryan Three let's go.  That's awesome. Heck yeah. Good stuff angels last team taken Daniel L That's disgusting man. Someone can do it one of three Shohei Otani and Nolan Ryan.