In this video, I will show you the method that I'm using to manage over 35 different eBay accounts and multiple Amazon users. Using this method, you don't need anymore to buy multiple VPS servers and pay a lot of money for this or to open different accounts on your computer. Also, using this method, you can share all of these different stealth accounts with your virtual assistant, give an access to your accounts easily to someone else, and work with Google Chrome browser, not only with Firefox. It works for both of them, for Firefox and Google Chrome, and you can use it for both eBay non-API accounts or API accounts. So, if you manage over one store, this video is really recommended for you, and even if not, it's a knowledge that you should know to grow. Hello everybody! Around 10 months ago, I uploaded some videos about how to work with multiple eBay accounts, multiple stealth accounts, and Firefox portable. The thing is that many people want to work with Chrome portable and also the game changed and there are much newer and much better methods to work with multiple stealth accounts, multiple Amazon accounts, multiple eBay accounts, or anything that you need multiple browsers for this. So, in this video, I want to show you exactly how I do this, how I manage over 35 different eBay accounts, and what is the newest method to do this. I also uploaded a post on our Facebook community, where I asked if you need a video like this. Here is the post, and I saw a huge demand over 30 people who wanted to get this video, over 26 comments at the moment of this video. So, now I want to jump into how to do it, and I will show you everything and all of the details about how to do it in the best way. So, the first thing that you actually need to manage multiple eBay accounts or multiple Amazon accounts, it doesn't matter, using Chrome browser, is to have a program which is called multi-logging. The multi-logging tool is a bit expensive, but I really recommend it, and you will see after this video that this is something that is really good to have for everyone who manages even over one eBay account. By the way, this method will work for you for both non-API and API methods, so it's really useful. So, what do you do? You go to multi-logging.com and download the app, register, and then you can open this tool. This is how it works and how it looks like. You open this tool and then you can go to new browser profile. After I click the new browser profile, I need to give it a name, so I will write here test account one. I recommend it to put here the name of this eBay store that will use this profile. Then here you choose the operating system, it doesn't matter, and here what you do is that you choose if you want it as Firefox or Google Chrome, which is mimic. I go for Google Chrome, then I click edit proxy settings and click HTTP proxy. About how to get HTTP proxy, I already created a video so you can just go to YouTube right here, Autodesk itself, and find here some videos about this. I will also attach links to these videos below this video on YouTube. Also, I really recommend you to join this Facebook community because here I can answer all of your questions about anything in roadshipping and same below any video on YouTube. So, I will go here, choose the HTTP proxy and list here my proxy details. In this case, I'm using the proxy and VPN service, but it actually doesn't matter which service you will use. So I will take the IP from here, put it here, then I take the port, put it in the right field, the login, and I will take the password from the file. I click check proxy to check if the proxy is working and I see that it works. Now click create profile. I can see here that the profile created, so I just click start and let's see what happens. So the start is launching the account and here is my new multi-logging. You can go from here to eBay or to any site. This will work same as an independent or portable Google Chrome browser. Same as Firefox portable and same as any other independent browser. It's same as opening another Windows account or another Mac account in your computer or even as having another computer. So you don't need to buy a new computer which I saw that many people does this. You don't need VPS, you don't need anything. You can just walk using this browser. Another thing that you can do is to give an access to your VAs. You can give them the access to your multi-logging and then they can also login and manage all of your accounts using these browsers. You don't need to create and pay to a lot of servers and this way I say that it's much cheaper even if the price is $100 per month. If you think about this, it's like few VPS servers and works much faster because it works on your computer. For sure I can download here any extension. So if I go to Google, let's say Autodesk Helper, I can download it easily from the Google Store. So it works same as any other Google Chrome browser. You can see that it will be installed very fast in my browser and that's all. One important thing is that for sure I can use it also without proxy but when you go out of the browser, click here and close and save. This way all of your passwords and all of your extensions will be saved. The extensions saved for you locally, so if you give it to your VAs, they will need to download the extensions again but everything else is shared like passwords, cookies and everything. Another cool thing that you can do using this amazing tool is to create groups. So if I go to groups, add new group, I can write here for example Amazon accounts, click create and then I can easily go and move this server to the group of Amazon accounts and what does it mean? It means that I can use one multi-logging account to manage all of my eBay accounts, Amazon accounts and everything that I need in one place. This is really comfortable and really, really, really recommended. I hope that you like this video. For any question, please ask under this video and I will answer any of your questions. Don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel because I will release soon another video about how to work with multi-logging on servers and some other important tricks, tips and information for any dropshipper in the world. It doesn't matter if you're doing Shopify, eBay, Amazon or anything because we just release a lot of useful content. Again, I promise you to answer for any question under this video. I go personally every day in answering all of the questions. Join our Facebook community, see you in the next videos and I hope that you enjoyed. Bye-bye.


I've chosen two manuscripts which come from the Abbey of St Augustine's Canterbury, which bears the name of the founder of the Christian Church in England, and I've chosen them not particularly because of their texts, I've chosen them because they're datable manuscripts, they come from a generation after the Norman Conquest, and because they illustrate Norman and English scribes working together. In other words, they show how manuscript evidence illustrates the Norman Conquest. You have individual craftsmen working in tandem to produce new texts. Now, the texts in this manuscript I have in front of me here are very much close to the heart of the Abbey. They are to do with the saints of the Abbey, and the page I have in front of me shows a Norman and an English scribe working side by side, and we can see them working together on the same page elsewhere in the manuscript, and this gives us important evidence. It shows that English scribes are still active and are still being trained to write English script a generation after the Norman Conquest, and it shows the French speakers and the English speakers are working together in a monastic context. The other manuscript I've chosen comes from the same period. It is related in terms of its script to this first manuscript, and it again shows how Norman and English scribes work together. It's a copy of a biblical commentary, and it demonstrates how an English scribe is copying a French text. So this is work that was written by a Norman who died in about 1050, and here we have an English scribe writing his typically English script, copying in a very un-English way this text. He's squeezing it onto the page, he's using a lot of abbreviations, he's using his native script, but in all other respects this is a Norman kind of book, and so this shows the Norman Conquest at work in the late 1090s. So these two manuscripts, both from a single institution, both from a single generation, one generation after the Norman Conquest, show the workings of the Conquest at the local level, at the level of an institution, and they give us a sense of the relationship between the English and the Normans, which otherwise we simply wouldn't have.


Hello, friends, and thanks for hanging out with us here on another episode of the Marker Report here on Cointelegraph. I'm your host, Benton, and we are joined again. We have Marcel Peckman back in the saddle this week, and we have Sam Borgie here. Sam Borgie is a business editor at Cointelegraph, where he brings a decade of experience in economic analysis and financial market writing. Marcel applies his 17 years of experience trading derivatives, options, futures to the crypto derivatives markets. Fellows, we're back. Marcel, welcome back. Glad to have you back on the show. What's going on this week, guys? The good thing about a bear market is that nothing happens for a while, and it's the perfect entry point for who is waiting. Well, I didn't buy at $60,000. I didn't buy at $40,000. I didn't buy at $20,000. Okay, you have another three months. You have maybe six months, but now it's the time to tell your friends and explain the benefits about crypto, because when they're following at $70,000, you should be telling them not to enter the market, exactly the opposite. So I think it's a good time to build community. Very good. Sam, how are we doing this week, man? Good. Come on, Marcel. You know no one's going to be buying at $18,000-$19,000. They're going to wait until it rips to $48,000-$49,000. Let me start to get interested. That's just the way these things work, right? It's your job, man. It's your job. My job, yeah. Well, I'm here to explain the merits of Bitcoin, and at the end of the day, only you, the viewer, can actually action that insight. Of course, not investment advice, but these are some pretty epic levels to be cost averaging to Bitcoin, and we've had them for a while. We're probably going to have them for a while longer. And as we've mentioned before, I don't really care about exact entry points. I'm just looking to accumulate as much as I can, given the current market environment. Very good. And I know we're going to have a lot of different conversations around the old family table during the holidays this year, considering what was last year. So for those who are trying to convert the family members, 2022 holiday season is going to be different this year. But we've got an action-packed show. Let's get a roll call from the chat. I see Catherine there, Birex, and Ahmad. Thank you for joining the show today. Make sure you tell us where you're tuning in from. If you have questions from Marcel or Sam, go ahead and chime in in the chat today. We're going to be answering those questions periodically throughout the show and want to give a big shout-out for all those joining. We're going to be giving away a $50 gift card to the CT store for all your desires, for all the CT swag. You could go ahead and drop your Twitter handle in there. And while you're at it, like and subscribe to the Cointelegraph channel here on YouTube, where we bring you the market report every Tuesday at 12 p.m. Eastern. So we're going to be getting into what you should be on the lookout for Bitcoin this week. We have some interesting article. Again, Tara's back in the headlines. They're making some changes. We're going to be diving into that. What does it mean? Is it a nothing burger? Does this change anything about your perspective on Tara? And then we're going to be talking about midterms, how this could potentially impact the crypto markets and macro markets at large. So make sure you stay tuned for the full show to get our full analysis on some of these hot topics this week. But let's go ahead and jump into our weekly roundup video to just kick things off today. Even though we're in this bear market, I always see those headlines each week. Seems like there's adoption kind of matriculating throughout the globe. You saw South Korea there, adopting blockchain for ID cards. So it's always good to see. I think there's some glimmer of light even though markets right now are in turmoil, which brings us to what's happening with Bitcoin this week. Bitcoin is edging closer to 20K. But before we get into this, I think we got to cover memes first though, because we got to have some laughs before we get into the business. So let's go ahead and jump into the memes, Dan Lowe and Adrian. Let's run it back. What do we got on the docket this week? Bitcoin sleeping on the 19K support that is hanging by a thread. Seems about right though. Ethereum holders after the merge, Bitcoin holders approaching the halving. Dogeholders thinking Twitter is going to charge shout out to all the dogeholders out there. Me just bought some coin thinking. It's an all-time low coin price starts to drop even more. Yeah, that's I think we've all been in the same boat. Yeah. NFT owner ventures into real world. That'll be $110, sir. I believe this should come trying to pay with NFTs. That's a new one. All right. Great memes. Thank you, Adrian, Dan Lowe for selecting those out this week. As some of those memes alluded to, Bitcoin's been hanging by a thread here on this 19K mark. Yet there was a big rally last week in the S&P. I think it went up close to like 4% in one day after the CPI news last week, which was kind of surprising. We're going to dive into that here. The first article that we have headline reads, Bitcoin price edges closer to 20K as way worse US data boost stocks. This was kind of a very interesting headline to me because it seems very counterintuitive. Why was this the news of US data being way worse? Why did this give a boost to stocks in general and what's your take on what you saw here, Marcel? People tend to forget, but after the 2008 housing crisis, we had the same market irrationality, meaning the market got addicted to stimulus after the lemon collapse and the 700 billion stimulus package. What that meant was that worse economic data meant the Federal Reserve and the Central Banks could continue injecting money in the system. People were hoping for negative or bearish economic data. That held true from August 2009 until August 2014. At that time, the Federal Reserve balance sheet increased from $2 trillion to $4.4 trillion in five years. People were just hoping, oh, let's pray that the economic data is bad so the Federal Reserve puts more money and the stock market goes up. That's what was happening back then and it's the same thing happening right now. Sam, what are you seeing from your perspective? It talked about the New York Industrial Index, which I thought was interesting. That's like not an Empire State Manufacturing Index. Why was this data so relevant for Bitcoin here? Yeah. Well, typically the Empire State Manufacturing Index isn't a huge market mover. If you take a look at the traditional markets, the forex markets, which are highly dependent on economic data, at least in the short term, the Empire State Manufacturing Index isn't that big of a deal. It's a bigger deal when you take a look at the PMI numbers, for example, the ISM PMI figures. But I think for me, the reason why this allowed Bitcoin to catch a bid or risk assets to catch a bid is because the Empire State Manufacturing Index showed a decline below zero, which indicates contraction in local business conditions in New York. I think a lot of investors are taking that to mean that the economy is finally slowing due to the Fed rate hikes, which is going to take a big chunk out of inflation. That's kind of what I'm gearing it toward. Investors actually want to see some softening of economic numbers to at least prove that the Fed's rate hike program is having a desired effect. So that's why we're watching the employment numbers so closely to see the employment rate or the rate of employment growth decline so that we can see, you know what, the Fed's actions are working. Therefore, it might actually reduce the pace of its rate hikes moving forward because inflation is starting to get under control. I think all of it ties back into inflation and inflation expectations right now. And while we're on the topic of inflation, friend of the show, Mike McGlone had a little quote in this article saying, risk asset inflation in 2022 and Fed tightening despite the world leaning toward recession pretend an elusive end game. We didn't actually see the effects of the money printing until many, many months later from 2020 from the pandemic. And now we're kind of starting to see the same as there's the quantitative tightening happen. This could kind of like matriculate and take months to actually see things come down and impact the overall macro markets. The other thing I wanted to highlight here in this particular article was the volatility here between low volatility bear market environments preceding large price moves. So these blue areas here are kind of highlighting what happens during these lower volatility times when we're kind of seeing these very small price ranges and it stays there for a while. So it looks back to January or July 2015. And then here in January 2019, and it looks like the spring of 2019. Marcel, what are you kind of seeing here? And we see these low volatility period is it's alluding to that things then kind of explode either upwards or downwards after that. What's your take on after a low volatility period happens here for Bitcoin? Okay, Benton. So first for viewers that do not understand how volatility works, volatility is a historical measure. So if the asset price, whether it's a stock or is a crypto has been moving up and down or randomly 5%, down 7%, up 8%, down 3%, that's a volatile stock. So when we're talking about conservative apparatus like high dividend payers, on good days they'll go up 2%. On bad days they'll go down 1% because they have some credibility. You know more or less what the profits of this company is going to be because, for example, it's an oil explorer or is a utilities company. So it has long term contracts. So low volatility means that the price has been moving in a steady manner. So up 2%, up 1%, up 2%, up 1%. It's not having those shocks. So if you say that low volatility happens before a high volatility period is the same thing as saying, well, my team scored low on the past four games. So this next game we're going to score 10 goals. It doesn't work that way. So the future does not depend on the past. How your team played over the past five games, it's not going to affect the impact of the next game. So I don't think historical volatility has anything to do with the future. So that's my opinion. Sam, do you agree with that? Well, we always say that past performance is in predict future performance. I think we harken on that over and over and over again. For some reason, crypto investors and Bitcoin investors seem to forget that and then they've overlay all these fancy charts showing past price action and why that same one is expected moving forward. I think Marcel's analysis is spot on there. You can't really extrapolate past volatility and expect that to have any kind of measurable impact or measurable expectation based on what happened in the past. Excellent. Well, while we're kind of on this topic of macro events happening, there is a midterm election happening here in the States and the article written by Yashu Gola, friend of the show, does an excellent job of actually breaking this down and showing some of the historical data behind Bitcoin and the accumulation periods that happen and then what happens after this election. So as we kind of see here, I'll pull up the graphic from the actual article here. He really highlights this support area. So it looked like in 2018, this was around 6400. And then after this midterm election, things tend to dump. So are things in any of your opinions, do things tend to look better before midterm election? And then we kind of see once a new Congress takes over, things tend to dump. What's your take here Marcel? How do you kind of view these events in the Bitcoin world? Well, first, for those who weren't around in 2018, what caused that crash between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, it happened on the same exact day of the four. So it had nothing to do with elections, but talking about 2022. Stock markets and crypto markets are having a strong correlation, meaning they're both moving in tandem. And midterms definitely affect the stock market. So if the stock market crashes further, going to the end of the year, I do believe that Bitcoin and cryptocurrency will have a strong price crash because no one is really expecting Bitcoin and Ethereum to go below $1,000 again or Bitcoin going below $17,000. Yeah, people are bearish, but when I say people are bearish, they're expecting a lateral market, maybe $17,000, $22,000, $25,000, but not going to $15,000. And no one is really expecting Ethereum to go to $500. So if the stock market crashes because of midterm and crypto collapses, we're going to see blood on the streets. And, Sim, I want to quickly highlight an excerpt from this article. It says, historically, in the 17 of the 19 midterm since 1946, the stock market has performed better in the six months after an election than in the six months following it. Is there any weight to this previous historical data? And you said it's not indicative of future performance, but I think it's a pretty impactful stat there. Yeah, it makes sense that once we get some midterm clarity that markets are able to rally on a sense of stability or a sense of understanding who the next Congress is going to be. Now, I think that we're in a very, very difficult macroeconomic climate. And I think that a lot of people now are beginning to see that perhaps the economy under the Biden administration isn't doing too well. I think if you see a clean sweep in Congress for the Republicans, that might feed into expectations that things could eventually turn around, because I don't know very many analysts that are positive about the economic performance of the past couple of years, even though we should have had a nice rebound after the COVID lockdowns. Simply reopening the economy should have been enough to sustain a nice rally for the economy, a nice rebound, without actually having to inflate the currency even more through massive stimulus programs. So I think that if it's perception and people think that Republicans are going to be better for the economy, better for business, maybe better on the energy front, for example, that could actually lead to positive expectations moving forward. And that could lead stocks to rise. We saw that under Trump, right? I mean, when Trump was elected, the perception was that he was going to be really good for business and the economy. And you saw a lot of the indicator's rise because of that, whether it actually happens in reality, a separate question, but perception could lead to market performance. And I know that Marcel wants to chime in here. Go ahead, Marcel. I think that as Benton is saying, this effect has been happening over the past 70 years. So it doesn't matter if Republicans or which side is winning the elections. I think what investors do not want is uncertainty. So ahead of election, there's a lot of uncertainty. And after the election, the uncertainty is gone. So that's why I think the trend becomes clear and better after the elections because there's less uncertainty in the market. When you're talking about a 70-year period, as Benton cited. And so my next question for you here, Marcel, is, are we more at risk of stagflation right now or just inflation from kind of like what you're seeing? And then, if you wouldn't mind just breaking down, what is stagflation for those watching who may not know? Okay, Benton. So stagflation is the worst thing that a government can face. It means that we're simultaneously having high inflation and GDP going down or negative GDP. So that's the worst thing that can happen because the prices are going up and consumers aren't buying. The economy isn't growing because inflation per se alone, it's not a bad thing. If the company is growing, if the country is going 5% per year and the inflation is 5% or 10% or two, it doesn't really matter because we have growth to support it. But the stagflation is the worst thing we can see. And as for the current inflation, the global inflation going above 10%, I don't think we have any similar experience over the past 40 years. We'll have to go back to the Deutsche Mark like 90 years ago because Germany was back then the biggest economy in the globe and suddenly because of wars, it started facing a huge inflation and monetary devaluation. So I do think that the global growth will suffer. I mean, there's a high chance of stagflation, but that does not necessarily translate to a housing crash or stock market crash. And I have an example for you. In Nigeria, I think it was 10 years ago, they had hyperinflation of 700%. And the stock market went up 500%. So people will buy stocks or buy houses to protect from inflation. So it doesn't necessarily mean that the nominal price of the house and the stock will go down. Sam, what are you kind of seeing from where you said, are we already in a state of stagflation? And if not, what would tell you that that's kind of on the horizon? Well, it seems like we're entering that phase right now, which is why I mentioned earlier, if we see a shift in political environment in Congress, that could lead to expectations that we can actually be getting out of this. And it might not actually come out in reality, but I think perception is really strong when it comes to investment. Now, in terms of stagflation, we have the high inflation. Everybody knows about that. The previous CPI print was lower than the previous month, but the core inflation rate continues to nudge upward, which is a very concerning thing. We're also seeing a slowing economic growth. We are in a technical recession. I don't care what government agency or their media lackeys like to pretend. We saw back to back quarters of contraction. The final key to that whole variable is going to be the joblessness or the employment picture. Right now, we're seeing employment continue to grow, so we haven't really seen a major decline on the employment side. I know investors want to see employment growth slow, so that could tie into inflation expectations and then monetary policy expectations. I wouldn't necessarily call it full blown stagflation yet, but we are heading in that direction. It's all going to depend on how quickly we can bring down the CPI or bring down inflation as the entire economy slows. The challenge is the Fed is hiking rates in a declining economy. That's even conventional Keynesian economics 101 says you're not supposed to do. You're supposed to raise interest rates when the economy is performing well, because it can sustain higher interest rates. When the economy is slowing, you don't normally hike interest rates as aggressively, but they're in a conundrum right now and it can't win situation given where the CPI print is currently. How long do you think it'll take to actually impact the core CPI of some of these new things that are rolling out with hiking interest rates and things like that? Is there a particular timeline that you're looking at? Honestly, Ben, it's difficult to say. My opinion is that we're in for an inflationary decade. I do think the CPI or that inflation in general is going to be higher than the 2% target for much of the decade. Now, we could see periods of deflation, but I think that overall we're heading for an inflationary decade. I'm not going to predict CPI on a month-to-month or annual basis, but all thing the Fed can do right now is impact the demand side. They probably are having an impact, whether that leads to a sustained decline in core CPIs yet to be seen. We're still at over 8% on the CPI headline and the core is above 6%. Remember, the Fed targets it around 2%. I think that the picture doesn't look very good. Remember, people who want to talk about deflation in the future, a lot of these numbers are measuring inflation against year-ago levels. The sustained increase in inflation that we've seen, that's not going to go away. That price increase is factored in. Future price increases might be lower, or future price increases on the year-over-year basis might decline, but all this CPI, all this inflation that we've had for the past couple of years, in my opinion, it's here to stay. It's been priced in. It's not going to go anywhere anytime soon. All right, very stark view of Marcel. You got something to add? I think you're muted. In Brazil, when people say they are employed, it means full time. We don't really have part-time jobs. What I'm hearing is that in the USA, the employment is low because people are getting two or three jobs. There's even more people working than the number of workers itself. Is that really impacting the number? Is the unemployment being masqueraded by low salaries in the US? Sorry, guys.  I was a mic drop. Marcel was just asking about the unemployment numbers. Yeah, people are taking two or three jobs. That is masquerading unemployment. I want to hear how the situation is going in the US and Canada. Yeah, I think that's the case. The employment numbers are tricky. The way they're put together, it's not exactly as clean as it looks. You have workforce participation remains near multi-decade lows. We haven't seen really an increase in workforce participation. Those who exited the labor market a long time ago remain out of the labor market. You are seeing people taking multiple part-time jobs. That is also hiding the impact of the fact that the employment picture might not be as strong as it seems. The unemployment rate is very low based on historical standards. Again, the unemployment rate doesn't factor in workforce participation because the unemployment rate is a percentage of people who are not employed but are actively searching for work. When you get the survey, you say you're actively searching for work. It doesn't account for the massive number of people who are out of the unemployment picture. They're out of the workforce and they're not looking for work. That's why the numbers are not as as it seems. You have to kind of add caveats to how you explain the overall employment picture. Right now, everyone's looking at the headline non-farm payrolls number which shows that things are going really well and the Fed hasn't been able to curtail that yet. That's leading to a lot of the trepidation around the market is because we've had massive rate hikes the past four or five months. We're massive based on historical standards but the employment picture is still improving. But as Marcel kind of alluded to, when you peel back the onion, employment might not be as strong as it seems at the surface. All right. I want to move us into our last article here but before we jump into the Terra article, quick shout out to all of our viewers. We're streaming live today on LinkedIn, folks. So everyone tune in on LinkedIn. Drop us a message. If you have questions from Marcel or Sam, say hello. Love broadcasting to a new audience over there. So shout out to all the LinkedIn viewers. All right. Now let's get into the business about Terra. They're making headlines again. New proposals coming down the pipeline. Let's go ahead and jump in. So the headline here is Terra developers proposed revised 95 million LUNA ecosystem funding program. Well, what happened proposed a revised expansion program for allocating 95 million LUNA, almost worth 248 million, as told by Terra, the new proposal is designed to incentivize development in the Terra ecosystem and fix issues in the original proposal. So however, the issue is the Terra staff explained that their only handful of projects with total value locked on the protocol and such lack of competition would not result in the proper distribution of mining revenue. All right. Does this anything change the game here to Terra in your opinion? Is this going to attract more developers, projects to build into what is a tarnished ecosystem in many ways? Sam, I'll start with you here. I want to hear your take as to some of these new proposals coming out from the Terraform labs. I don't really see any positive coming out of this. I mean, I think that you take a look at what's happening with Doquan. You take a look at how the catastrophic decline of an Algo stablecoin, I think that the damage has been done. Now, there still is monetary value supposedly in the network. You know, when you have so many tokens, it's possible that during any kind of market upswing, the market cap can rise and make Luna a more relevant project. But to be honest, I don't think that these proposals are going to solve anything about the perception issue because what happened with Terra is a massive, massive blow to the perception of crypto in general. And I think that a lot of investors aren't going to want to go near that project, especially as you mentioned, activity isn't really happening right now on that network. So it's starting to kind of fade into the background. Only thing keeping it in the foreground are the news clippings about Doquan being on the run. He says he's not on the run.  Let's be real here. Marcel, do you kind of fall in the same boat as Sam? Are these proposals kind of going to do anything for the community or ecosystem in your opinion? I don't think it's going to help. They have particularly held much dependence, reliance on the stablecoin, the pseudo-agoretic stablecoin, and that boat has launched. So without the stablecoin, I don't think the network sustained itself because let's face it, it doesn't have any technology different from the other competitors which have been working for five years plus. We have MakerDal, died of stablecoin working for over five years. It survived two market crashes. So I don't think the proposal will change anything of that. No, I want to know if there's any comparisons that we might be able to draw from previous projects that went through something similar, maybe not as massive, but I recall the EOSs in the NEOs of the world and even Tezos potentially kind of going through something similar. Is there any parallel that you might be able to draw from previous projects that have failed and then came back and rise from the ashes? Marcel, is there any comparison that you might be able to draw? Yeah, the top of my mind, I remember Sushi, the decentralized exchange that launched its own token. And after the token launch, the Sushi chef, the founder of Sushi, got caught withdrawing $16 million from himself and the community went hayward. So what happens that the Sushi guy, the chef, he backtracked and he said, okay, I'm going to give back the funds to the treasury, but I'm out of the project. And he gave Sushi to FTX to Sam Bankman-Fred, and the community embraced the newly leadership and the TVL grew after a new token issue to dilute the previous Sushi holders and the co-founders and et cetera. So new tokens were issued and still the price went up. So I think there's precedence saying, yeah, it can happen, but I don't think that's the case. And Sam, do you think that Tara can rise from the ashes here and are there any other projects that you might say, hey, this was a perfect example of how it could potentially come back? Marcel raised a really good example. I just think with Tara, so many people got burned.  I don't know if I know of any similar examples. You mentioned EOS. I mean, that was an entirely different ball of shenanigans. You had a year-long ICO.  What has EOS done after raising $4 billion? Tezos. I know it was all about Tezos till Ubezos. I haven't really heard much from that community anytime in the recent past. I don't think any of them have had the same level of death spiral that the Tara ecosystem had. And I think the sting is too big. So I don't see any parallels right now. And again, anything can happen in crypto. But in the foreseeable future, I think that it's going to have a hard time attracting new capital, new interest, new users, et cetera. I think I would, I'm going to agree with both of you because I think there's a case where if SBF decides to come in and say, hey, I'm just going to buy Tara out and it's going to fold under Salon or some sort of integration, that would be the only way I think Tara survives long run. However, I just, I think to Sam's point, they've just burned so many people that that's going to leave a bitter taste in folks mouths for many, many years ahead. So it's going to be a tough sliding to even get that going back to even anywhere close to where they used to be. But that's going to do it for our articles this week. I see folks are chiming in the chat here, Bitcoin Pro says, when will the bear market end and how long is a piece of string? I don't know, guys. When's the bear market going to end, guys? I guess we'll leave that, we'll leave that as a relevant question a little bit later. We got crypto tips next. So let's go ahead and jump into what we're going to talk about this week where you give you the quick hitting quick crypto tips to make sure you are sharp at all times when you're in crypto. So let's go ahead and jump into that. All right, you probably heard us talk about the relative strength index, the RSI. The RSI is an oscillatory indicator that shows whether an asset is overbought or oversold. It measures the range zero to 100. And once the RSI value of a crypto asset is below 30, it is technically oversold. And when the RSI value is above 70 indicates an overbought asset price overbought state is a potential sell signal. While an oversold state indicates a potential buy opportunity. This can be found on your trading view views. You can look at the RSI and see that wave and oscillatory indicator go up and down as the market continues to move. And that's our crypto tip for this week. Got all the tips for you. All right, I know Marcel's got some really good insights this week. He's going to be talking to you about some trading tips and talking about how to navigate certain things. So I'm going to let Marcel jump in here with some of his tips and insights for this week. Okay, so first to answer the viewer's question. When does the bear market will finish? Probably when you capitulate. When you say, I no longer want to trade cryptos. I'm giving up.  Then on that very next day, the market's going to rally. But going to a more serious topic right now. So when you invest in cryptos, regardless of betting on Bitcoin, censorship resistant, Ethereum, decentralized processing capacity, or even the memes and the dodge coins and NFTs, you're essentially saying that the traditional market is going to lose ground versus digital assets. The problem is most crypto investors are under 45 years old, as me. And we've grown accustomed to seeing big tech names such as Google, Amazon, Tesla, Apple, and we're familiar with those companies. We know that they can bring a lot of growth and revenues, but we largely underestimate the sheer far power of the traditional finance, meaning Berkshire Hardaway from Warren Buffett, Visa, Mastercard, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, the Chinese banks. To put things in perspective, the top eight financial institutions combined earnings of 2021 was $360 billion. So that's almost entire Bitcoin market capitalization in net profits, not revenues, in a single year. So whether our crypto nerds like it or not, our products and services compete with the traditional finance because sending value across the globe is part of the banking system. Even simple crowdfunding efforts, such as launching a decentralized application or an NFT collection, you're bypassing PayPal, credit cards, and the traditional finance industry. Sure, we can bet that those secular companies will join our table and compete using open source networks and protocols, but that seems ingenious. Luckily, for some of us, our blockchains are sufficiently decentralized, so they're going to survive the banking regulatory lobby and the price suppression efforts. So I want to share a screen here, please, Danilo. So on that screen, you have the iShares financial ETF in blue at $71.5 versus crypto total capitalization in orange at $890 billion. So for now, the correlation is positive, meaning both assets are moving in the same direction, but that won't last for long, because currently, our enemy is the same as the traditional finance. It's the global crisis, it's worse, it's commodity shortest, it's the inflation, so we're fighting on the same side. Thank you, Danilo. But as soon as this honeymoon phase is over, it will become clear that crypto is competing against the banking system.  Maybe it's going to work, maybe not, but if our community is not here to test it, to try to incentivize, to call our friends and explain the benefits, it's worth zero. So it really depends on you and us. Very good, Marcel. Excellent insights and it's true, we gotta have adoption across the entire board and it all starts with you watching at home. We had a quick question though from LinkedIn audience here, I'm getting a ping from Adrian, says from Liam Mcgarith, how will the current bear market impact the potential XRP rally post-presumed court victory against the SEC? Could this flip the market to bull or would likely be a temporary weekly pump? So we've seen a lot of stuff in the news recently, XRP's PR team is doing overtime right now, but what's your take with the presumed court ruling being in their favor? Will this potentially have an impact on the greater markets or just that particular asset, Marcel? I think XRP for the next 12 months, it's completely decoupled from the cryptocurrencies, because there's a binary outcome. Either it's going to win against the SEC, the regulator, or it's going to lose. And if it loses, it's not just the fine, the $1.2 billion fine that they're going to have to pay. Probably they're going to have to disolve repo labs or no longer be in control of the network. So they're going to have to find other arrangements for XRP to continue. So maybe in the end, it's going to be a good outcome, a positive outcome for XRP holders, but it's going to take a while for sure. So in the short term, if the decision is negative, you can certainly expect a 30% or higher losses for the holders. But if the outcome is positive, yeah, it can go 2X, 5X, it can go even 10X on the news because everybody is expecting it. And if there's new buyers around and the XRP company is no longer selling the tokens, yeah, it's going to rally with or without Bitcoin and Ethereum. And Sam, could the XRP case be a catalyst for things to turn into a bull market? The second half of that question there. I don't think it's enough to be a catalyst. I think the market is still led by Bitcoin. But here's the thing, if XRP were to win, that would be a massive, massive win because I don't think anybody was really pricing in. They're winning this case against the SEC. This is the SEC. They're not going to go after you unless they are absolutely convinced they're going to win. The idea that XRP could come out of this a winner, I think is going to be a massive boon for XRP. You could see a similar impact or a similar trickle effect on other assets, but I still think that the market is dictated by macro right now, which is what dictating Bitcoin right now in the short term, and from Bitcoin, everything still seems to flow. So it'll be interesting to see what happens, but right now I don't know how much of a sustained rally the broader market can experience, even if XRP were to make this massive victory if and when that happens. Could be potential implications for the greater crypto market if the ruling is also, I guess, in favor of commodity versus not, whatever, whatever. So I guess we will see, time will tell us what that verdict will hold. All right, let's get into our markets pro tokens that you should have been watching this week. We had a couple of newsquakes fire off, but first, don't forget to drop your Twitter handle in the chat. We're going to be giving away $50 to one lucky winner today for the Cointeller F store. We're going to give you swag. So please drop your Twitter handle in the chat. But let's go ahead and jump into markets pro we had two tokens you should have been watching this week. Let's go. All right, this week we had Lido. We'll do Lido first. All right, Lido, what happened was yet another token that saw a solid price action after a newsquake. And its price was $1.19 after this newsquake, and it announced that Lido finance launched on arbitrum and optimism, two of the most popular layer two networks. The next day price rose 15% to peak out at $1.30. So love me some arbitrum in optimism. Those seem to be two thriving layer two ecosystems. So big announcements from Lido this week. The other token that we're watching was Garry trading on the ticker GRI. Like most news about partnerships also dropped ahead of a major price movement this week. This was the case for Garry, the native token of the social app Ching Garry, which saw a newsquake drop when it was trading at about $0.05. This newsquake informed markets pro subscribers of the new partnership between Ching Garry and the digital fantasy sports platform Rage Fan. Just two days later, the price stored 20% to peak to $0.06. So big gains for those two tokens of this week. And what happened? Well, our users got those newsquake alerts, which allow them to hopefully get in on this action right as it was happening. And that's the power having that markets pro app in your pocket on your phone. I see a lot of people chime in here with their Twitter handles. Awesome to see that. And that's going to do it for our markets pro segment for this week. All right, looks like Catherine wants to know does anybody go into LA blockchain? So I'm sure we are sending tons of folks there. I know it's a big event coming up here. I think in the next couple of weeks at the end of October. All right, guys, let's get some closing thoughts here. I want to hear from you. What are you going to leave our audience with Marcel? I have a question for us, Bencom. Earlier on, you said about 15% gains and 20% gains. Is that real in crypto? It's been like a year since I had some. I think I should definitely change my Marcel, have you been using the markets pro app? That's what that is for is those types of gains, man. Not for trading. But yeah, for writing stories, yeah, but not for trading. So I should be definitely be changing my momentum or what I'm doing. Yeah. I mean, that's the power of markets program and 15% gains in these markets will take them. We will take them all day. All right. Do you have any closing thoughts for us today though? What do you want to leave folks with at home? Well, I can start. People are too worried about headlines on the newspapers, about inflation, about wars, about crisis and etc. And what I think is that people should understand that the only thing that's going to make you safe, whether you're in a bear market or a bull market is working on yourself. And that's mean taking courses, taking care of your health, investing in sound opportunities instead of buying your options and crazy stuff. So I do think that you should step away from the keyboard, step away from the screens for a couple of days and rethink how you can develop yourself to be a better worker, a better person in society, a better investor, a better family, a better friend. And consequently, your money issue is going to resolve or at least it's going to improve after you do that. So focus on yourself first. Excellent advice, Sam. What about you, man? What kind of closing thoughts do you want to leave us with today? Well, we'll have a wholesome closing, you know, because Marcel really set the tone for some wholesome feedback. As Marcel said, you know, also, if you're interested in the crypto or Bitcoin space, consider finding a way to work in the sector and getting paid in Bitcoin and crypto, right? It's not only about how much crypto you can earn in a bull market, you can actually accumulate by working in the sector. There's a lot of opportunities, as we've written about on CT quite often, some of the brightest minds in the world right now are actually working in the crypto sector. A lot of companies are still hiring. So maybe explore some opportunities there, use it as an opportunity to learn, learn about, you know, the various projects that you might want to invest in, also learn about the technology itself and, you know, have confidence that we're in a sector right now that is going to change the world. Bitcoin has already changed the world in many important ways. We're going to start to see that being come more actualized, I think in the next 10 to 15 years. So we're still early. You have a lot of opportunity to really build some some intellectual capital and to maybe divert your labor into potential crypto earnings moving forward. And read CoinTelegraph, our editorial team does such an excellent job of breaking down the news and educating you. So if you're tuning in today, your rookie don't know where to start CoinTelegraph, read all his articles. I know that's what I did when I first got started in the industry. And folks, your health is your wealth. Like Marcel said that very well, everything is not about crypto. Even though we love it, we're passionate about it. We believe in it. Make sure that you take care of yourself. So excellent advice from Sam and Marcel, such wise words from the gentleman here on the show. We appreciate everyone for tuning in. We're going to give away our $50 to the CoinTelegraph store. First though, I see Ahmed Baouazir at Bawa underscore 77 was chiming in there during chat today. Appreciate it.  We appreciate everyone from tuning in, especially those jumping in from LinkedIn today. Glad to have you here on the show. We're going to be here next Tuesday, 12pm Eastern. We're here. This is in the Marker Report and we are CoinTelegraph, the future of money. Thanks for tuning in.


The Shading Editor is a node editor specifically used for editing shader nodes. This may seem intimidating at first, but nodes are very powerful tools that allow for flexible customization. Keep in mind that many of the basic functions of how to navigate the shader editor will also apply to the compositor, Blender's other node editor. So, first things first, navigating in the node editors is very similar to navigation in the viewport. Middle click drag to pan your view and scroll to zoom in and out. Moving your nodes is simple as you can simply left click drag a node over. However, you can also use the gr and s hotkeys to grab, rotate and scale your nodes respectively. Now that we got that out of the way, let's explain how nodes work. There is typically a starting node or several starting nodes that then combine using other nodes until they all converge into a single ending point, which is the output. As you can see here, the default material already has a shader node and an output node. In this case, the shader node is a starting point and the output node is our ending point. It should be noted that it is possible to have more than one output node, but only one output can be displayed at a time. This depends on which one was last selected, which will highlight the top of the node red. So let's pretend we want to add an image texture to our shader, but maybe we also want to add a gradient to that texture at the same time. Simply navigate to the image file you want to use in the file browser panel. Left click drag your texture file into the node editor. This will create an image texture node for you. You can then left click drag the color output of this node into the base color input of our shader. You might notice that the yellow circular connection receivers are the same color as each other, telling you that they are indeed the same data type. Another way to quickly connect two nodes is to select them both, go to the node menu, and select make links. This forms a connection of matching type between the two nodes, prioritizing the uppermost connection slots. For hotkey users, simply press F as in fill to do the same thing. Now this looks great, but I did say I wanted to add a gradient to this texture. So let's go ahead and go into the add menu above the shader editor, and go to textures gradient texture. For hotkey users, simply press shift A to access the add menu at any time. After you select a node from the add menu, you can right click to cancel the add or left click to confirm its placement. Let's put it to the side underneath our other texture we want to mix it with. Now that we have our gradient texture, we can test what it looks like by simply plugging it into our shader base color node. One way to do this is to move the outgoing connection from our image texture to stem from our gradient texture node instead. If you ever want to do this, simply control left click, drag the connection. This will allow you to pick up the outgoing connection and connect it to a different output source. Quick note, holding control is not necessary for picking up existing incoming connections. Let's go ahead and connect this now to our gradient texture output. As we can see, it is indeed a black and white gradient texture. Cool, now we can reconnect our image texture and figure out how to combine these two textures. Because these two outputs are color outputs, we want to manipulate these values with a color node of some sort. This is a great way to get hints on what nodes to use in certain situations. Let's go back into our add menu and take a look under the color category. We see that there is a node called mixRGB. Well, we do want to mix our textures in some way, so I think it sounds like something we want. Let's add it in. You might notice that before you confirm the node's placement, if you hover over an existing connection, it will highlight that connection. Placing the node over an existing highlighted connection will automatically sandwich it between the two connected nodes. Let's do this for our new mixRGB node. Now that we have our mix node connected, you'll see that our texture has gone a bit gray. That's because the mix node currently is using a default gray color as the secondary input to mix our texture with. Let's simply connect our gradient texture node into the bottom half of this mix editor to replace the default gray color. As you can see, we're already getting there. The gradient texture is now mixing with our image texture. Okay, but let's say I want to quickly compare the difference between having the gradient mixed and having nothing mixed at all. To do that, Blender allows you to mute nodes. Simply select a node and right-click for the context menu. Then select toggle node mute. You can then select it again to unmute the node. For hockey users, simply press M as in mute to do the same thing. As you can see, muting a node allows the connection to bypass the effects of the node. The gradient is no longer being shown. Keep in mind that muting a node will choose the uppermost input to bypass as the output, ignoring all other inputs. So let's say I toggle between my options, gradient or no gradient, and I decide that I prefer it with no gradient at all. Well, for that, we might as well delete the mix node. There are a few ways to delete a node. Most forms of deletion work here in the same way as they do in the 3D viewport. Let's select the mix node and press X or the delete key to delete it. However, as you can see, this forces us to manually reconnect the image texture node back to our shader node. This is a bit tedious, but luckily there's a way to avoid it. Let's go ahead and hit undo until we have our mix node back. Now, we can right click our mix node and select delete with reconnect. As you can see, the mix node has been deleted but keeps the connection intact. For hotkey users, you can simply press control X. Another trick you can use is to simply alt click drag the node away. This will disconnect the node without disrupting the existing connection. Wonderful! Now my shader looks exactly the way I want it. Or does it? What if I changed my mind and decided that I wanted no image texture at all? How do we completely disconnect our image texture from our shader? One way we can do that is to simply click and drag the endpoint of the connection off of our shader node and release. This is intuitive but can be very tedious. A faster way is to cut the connections with the links cut tool. You can select the links cut tool in the quick tools menu on the left. Once you select it, you can use this tool by left click dragging over the line of a connection or connections. This will break any intersecting connections immediately. For hotkey users, simply hold control and right click drag. I hope this gives you a good introduction on how to navigate the node editors as well as how to manipulate nodes.


Yes, Roma Wines taste better because only Roma selects from the world's greatest wine reserves for your pleasure. And now, Roma Wines, R-O-M-A. Roma Wines, present. Suspense. Tonight Roma Wines bring you Miss Angela Lansbury in A Thing of Beauty, a suspense play produced, edited and directed for Roma Wines by William Spear. Suspense, Radio's Outstanding Theatre of Thrills, is presented for your enjoyment by Roma Wines. That's R-O-M-A. Roma Wines, those better tasting California wines enjoyed by more Americans than any other wine, for friendly entertaining, for delightful dining. Yes, right now a glassful would be very pleasant as Roma Wines bring you Angela Lansbury in a remarkable tale of Suspense. Would you give me your arm? Yes, sir. Oh, thank you. I think we should just miss the storm, if we hurry. A rather somber place, isn't it? It gives her seclusion, and that's all she's ever asked for since she came here. That and what little spiritual comfort I've been able to give her. How long ago was that, sir? That she came here, I mean? Oh, eight, let me see. Oh, no, no, no, nine. Nine years ago in May. But it was long before that she left the stage.  Though it's not her mind was ever sick or I'm mistaken. They do say she's a bit on the eccentric side, though. Well, you'll be her spiritual advisor yourself soon enough when I've retired. And I want you to meet her without prejudice. And one day I'll tell you what I know, which the goodness knows is little enough. And what I have reason to believe, which is somewhat more... Ah, it seems we'll just about escape the branch. She lives completely alone? Oh, the one servant, that's all. Oh, Father Benton. Ah, Suzette, this is my new curate. The Reverend Mr. Sedley. We're here to see Mr. May. Well, does she know you are not alone? I could, Suzette, I haven't any idea. But you might never seen out of the rain why you're so informed, huh? But very well, coming. Thank you. If you will wait in the study, I will ask if mademoiselle is able to see you. What? Well, it's got into the woman. She knows Mr. May's been seeing me every fortnight at the same time for nine years. There's a picture here. Is it of her? Probably. My word, she was a beauty. Oh, your father could have told you. Ah, yes, she was a legend of two continents.  Is it true, sir, that she sees no one but you, no one? As far as I know, she has never set foot outside this house in all the time she's been here. Nor has she ever had a single visitor beside myself. But why? Well, what did we see you now, Father? In her parlor across the hall. Oh, thank you, Suzette. Father Benton. Ah, hello. Come in, come in. Thank you. I do hope you don't mind my receiving you in the dark. But I have a mortal grave of life during the storm. Oh, not at all, my dear. You'll find two quite comfortable chairs just there by the window, I think. Oh, thank you, thank you. Uh, Nedly, this is my new curate, Mr. Sedley. Oh, yes, Mr. Sedley. It's a great pleasure to meet the famous beauty, even in the dark. Yes, I suppose you've heard of my beauty, Mr. Sedley. You know, as you came in, I was looking at this little gold mirror, engraved on the back of the words, a thing of beauty is a joy forever. Ah, Keats. Yes, Oscar gave it to me. Oh? He said it was a magic mirror. When you are very old, Madeline, he said, you will only have to look in it to see yourself as you are now, young and radiant and a joy forever. And I've believed ever since that Oscar was really something of a magician, because you know it's true. Uh, was that Oscar wild, Mr. Main? Yes, dear Oscar. Dear dead days. I suppose you've already heard of all the wild tales of my lurid past, Mr. Sedley. Oh, no, Mr. Main, I assure you I... I don't believe that Father Bentham has ever caught me in a very reminiscing mood, have you, Father? But since you were one, baby, thicker here, Mr. Sedley, perhaps it would be better if you heard the truth from me. Mr. Main, don't think I... All the truth is wild enough. It all began, I suppose, when John Gaylord gave me my first speaking part. That was so too far ago to tell. My hair was a little darker. My voice was not quite as rich as it is now. Try four more silvery, perhaps. John and Nell gathered for the leads, and my part, well, it was one of those obscure little parts that no one pays any attention to until some obscure little actress comes along and makes the start of a career with it. It was then that I first experienced what will always be to me in all the range of human feelings, the supreme exaltation when you hear the whole frenzied applause of an audience for you, for you alone. Come in, John. Simply marvelous. Thank you, John.  A fool? I've told you to play the part down, but it's getting worse and worse. Tonight she's absolutely furious. She's going to make trouble for you, Madeline. Trouble? What kind of trouble? Oh, you don't know Nellie Garrett. But I know my audience, don't I? Oh, Madeline, you're so young and foolish and so beautiful. Why, thank you, John. So terribly beautiful. Oh, John, you're leading up to it again, aren't you? Oh, Madeline, this play isn't going to last forever. Even you can't keep it alive much longer. Mighty, why do we make plans together now? We could have our own company. As the great John Gaylord and Mrs. Gaylord? No, no, of course not. Why, in a couple of years, you'd be as famous as Nell Garrett herself. Perhaps I don't want to wait a couple of years. Besides, John, I don't love you. Oh, well, do you love anyone? No, but when I marry it will be... Oh, it will be an up-and-coming young member of Parliament like you. Some of you must know where she is. You're in for it now, Madeline. Right away. No. So there you are, my friend. Don't go easy, Miss Garrett. She's meant no harm. No harm indeed. She has merely ruined my entire last act curtain for 29 consecutive performances, hoisting her skirts clear above the ankle, ogling the stalls like a music hall gretchen. It's only because it's that kind of a problem. Oh, is it indeed? Well, as long as I play the lead in this company, I will not have my best speech in the whole play utterly ruined by rowdy applause for the gutter antics at a half-baked ensue.  And while we're on the subject, Mr. Gaylord, there are a few points I should like to discuss with you. When you help Miss Tremaine down from the swing in the second act, there's no need for you to keep your arm around her during the entire remainder of the scene. I'll admit that she appears ready to swoon at any moment. But one peep show performance is quite enough for an evening in Drury Lane. Well, really, Miss Garrett, if you can no longer hold either your audiences or your lovers... You cheat! Nell, I won't let the will of my own...   I left the theater and walked aimlessly out into the night. My eyes blinded with tears.  For I knew that Nell Garrett could ruin me with every theater manager in London, and I knew she would. How long I wandered through those misty streets or where, or even what I did, I shall never know. But just as dawn was breaking, I found myself by some odd twist of fate passing by the lodgings of John Gaylord. On a sudden impulse, I climbed the steps to his door. Yes, Madeline. Hello, John. My darling, did anyone see you? See me. Come in, come in. Where have you been? Just walking. Good Lord. Alone? Yes, why? Don't you know? Yes, John, I'm afraid I do my career. Your career?  John, what is it?  Dead! Murdered. Oh, John! The police have been looking all over London for you. I've been expecting them here every moment. For me? Of course for you. But why?  Why wouldn't they be looking for you? Now, Madeline, listen to me, listen to me now. Where did you go? What did you do? Didn't anyone see you? Did you talk to anyone? No, no. But you've got to tell them something. What can I tell them something? Because if you don't, they'll... John! Yes, yes, they'll hang you, Madeline. Please, Madeline, you've got to think, try to remember something. I'm so lonely. If only I had a friend like that. Have got a friend, Madeline. I'm your friend, believe me. Not someone who loved me enough to at least say they were with me. Madeline! Oh. Who is it? Inspector Tullis. Scotland Yard. Madeline, in there. Quickly, in the bedroom. John! Don't worry. I'll tell them something. I'll hurry. I'm coming. I'm sorry to rouse you at this early hour, sir. But all right, sir. Come in. You are Mr. John Gaylord? Yes. Are you Mr. Gaylord's company, Drury Lane? Yes. Can you tell me, Mr. Gaylord, anything of the whereabouts of Miss Madeline Tremaine? Madeline Tremaine? Yes. Why, I... Did you call me, darling? Oh, excuse me. Who is this lady, Mr. Gaylord? Well, who are you? I'm from the police, madam. Police? There's been a murder. Miss Nell Garrett at the Queen's Company was found stabbed in her home last night. Nell Garrett? Do you know her? Well, of course this is... I'm afraid, madam, that I shall have to ask you for your name. I am Madeline Tremaine. I'm so sorry that you find me somewhat in disarray. Miss Tremaine, I'm afraid I shall also have to ask you to account for your whereabouts after you left the theatre last night. Very well. Mr. Gaylord can account for my whereabouts. Well, Mr. Gaylord? I... You see, Inspector, it's rather a delicate matter because since I left the theatre last night, I've... I've been here. Is that true, Mr. Gaylord? Yes. Quite true, Inspector. Ah, I see. Is that satisfactory, Inspector? Yes, yes. Well, I don't think I need trouble you any further for the moment. I quite understand your position, Inspector. It's a terrible, terrible thing. Well, good day to you. Good day, sir. Oh, Madeline. Yes, John? Madeline, you shouldn't have done it. Why, they'll have the scandal all over every newspaper in the city. But a scandal is better than a hanging, isn't it? Oh, but there must have been some other way. Now they'll tell you to shreds. They won't have you in anything better than a music hall for the rest of your life. John, there won't be any scandal if... If what? John, it wasn't just my tiff with Nell Gaylord that sent me wandering through the fog last night. I was thinking about something much more serious. What do you mean? I was thinking about what you said. What I had said? John, perhaps I don't really love you yet, but there's no one else. And you're the finest, kindest man I've ever known. Madeline.  Oh, Madeline, I love you more than anything else in this world, but I wouldn't have you marry me for gratitude. I wouldn't marry any man for gratitude. Madeline, if I would have told you that I wasn't here last night either, that I couldn't explain my whereabouts. Oh, I see. Would you still marry me? Yes, John. I will marry you. Suspense Roma Wines are bringing you Angela Lansbury in A Thing of Beauty. Roma Wines' presentation tonight in Radio's Outstanding Theatre of Thrills. Suspense! Between the acts of suspense, this is Truman Bradley for Roma Wines. Whether you serve wine infrequently or often, enjoy the better taste of Roma Wines. Yes, Roma Wines give you more pleasure with every sip. Roma Wines are better three ways in fuller bouquet, richer body, and better taste. To bring you better tasting wine, Roma begins with California's choicest grapes. Then with ancient skill and wine-making resources unmatched in America, Roma Master Ventners guide this grape treasure unhurriedly to tempting taste perfection. These choice wines are then placed in millions of years before. And from these reserves, the world's greatest reserves of fine wines, Roma later selects for your pleasure. This holiday weekend, enjoy rich Roma California port or toque, serve after dinner, or in a tall glass with ice and soda, as a refreshing warm-weather cooler. Served anyway, Roma tastes better. That's why more Americans enjoy Roma than any other wine. That's R-O-M-A, Roma. Your best buy in good taste. And now Roma Wines bring back to our Hollywood soundstage Miss Angela Lansbury, who is Madeleine from Maine, resumes the recital of a brilliant and stormy career. It is a tale told to two clergymen in a darkened room, a tale well calculated to keep them and you in suspense. Shall I continue, gentlemen? Oh yes, please do, Mr. Maine. It's most absorbing. Indeed it is. Really? I hope you don't mind the lights turned off. It's the storm. I suppose I am a sort of an elemental creature, but I always love to sit here and have it dark when it's stormy outside. Not at all. Well then, our marriage was a very happy one, perhaps not entirely in the high tradition of grand passion, but a thoroughly comfortable, civilized relationship, until something happened which is so often a tragic feature of wedded life between two stage personalities. You see, for the first two seasons, John and I always played together, and then managers began to ask for me alone, what could I do? I was young, just reaching the peak of my career. John was past his prime and popularity, and so at last he had no longer even tried to have a career, but lived along on false hopes and idle dreams and tiresome reminiscences and who, well, took up those little hobbies to pass the time away. Oh, a little stout. It was very difficult for both of us. And then, for me, came the time and opportunity that every actress dreams of. Men were there. Hello, Susette, I've got the most wonderful news, the most wonderful, wonderful news. That you, Madeline? I'll tell you all about it later. We men were there. Yes, John? Come in here a little bit. I'll show you something. Where are you? I'm in here in the den. Oh, good heavens, now what? I thought I'd keep it a secret, but I had my first exhibit, but I couldn't wait. I've taken up etching. Yes. Oh, here. What's that? You. What? Well, it's only the copper plate, of course. You see, the whole principle of etching, Madeline, I'll go. What's the matter? You almost knocked over that vat of nitric acid.  Well, if you must have that sort of thing around, darling. Well, of course, that's the whole thing. You see, the sketch simply scrapes the wax off the copper plate. Then you drop it in the acid. Well, that's very interesting, darling, but... Oh, yes. Well, tell me, what happened in town? Anything? Anything. Everything. Plans, eh? Anyone ask for me? Oh, yes, everyone ask for you, John. I told them you were well. No, I mean, well, I thought there might be a couple of decent places for a change. I might consider something. John, John, darling, how are you on Romeo? Romeo? Yes, you see, Maxwell has finally asked me to do a Shakespeare repertory. And high time, by the way. I'm starting in Romeo and Juliet, and I need... Why didn't you tell me Romeo? We'll be a sensation. It's just the very thing I need. Oh, I can do it all right. Take off a little weight, brush up in the lines. I've done it before, you know. I know, John, darling. Oh, you're the dearest wife and the best friend a man ever had. You know, lately I've actually wanted sometimes if you might not think I wasn't. Oh, my darling. I know, John, but don't count too heavily on this. I'm not quite sure yet. The things will work out. Work out? How else can they work out but perfect? Very well. I'd like to begin reading here at home first. Tomorrow evening. Again, from yet I should kill thee with much cherishing. Got it. No.  Good night, good night. Parting is such sweet sorrow that I shall say good night till it be morrow. Sleep dwell upon thine eyes, peace in thy breast. Would I were sleep and peace so sweet to rest? Yes, yes. Yes, but you see, on those last, you should really already be moving off the stage. You don't want to make too much of them after all. The scene really ends when Juliet leaves the balcony. I know, but you can't just throw them away, Madeline, dear. Those are very famous lines. Yes, but, John, we mustn't think so much in terms of lines as a performance. Pardon me, Madeline. Yes, Susette. Monsieur Alexandre Duncan is here. Yes, show him in. We met, Madeline. Helen Duncan, what's that young ham coming around for? Well, John, I've been meaning to tell you. Hello, Madeline. Hello, Alec. You know my husband. Oh, yes, of course. How'd you do, Mr. Tremaine? The name is Gailor. Oh, yes. Of course, Mr. Gailor. Well, I say, aren't I the luckiest fellow in the world? Are you? John, you've been playing Romeo opposite Madeline Tremaine. Oh, Madeline, when I got your cable, I could hardly believe it. I jumped on the boat without even packing a bag. Is something wrong? John, I've been trying to tell you, but I didn't want to hurt your feelings. If I've interrupted something. No, no, it's all right, Alec. John, please don't make a scene. I had to have someone to rehearse with me until Alec got here. And I knew you wouldn't be the slightest help to me if you thought... Oh, John, why must you make an issue of this?  But I never would have believed that you could do anything quite so vile.  You didn't really think that a man with a 40-inch waistline and double chin could ever play Romeo, did you? Madeline, I say... Get out of here.    I see. Oh, I have to go and apologize, I suppose. John, I want to talk to you. John?  Oh, John, I'm terribly sorry for what I said. It was beastly of me, and I... Oh, it's quite all right, Madeline. Oh, John, I knew you'd see it that way when you came to see it. Yes, because you see I am going to play Romeo. Oh, really, John? Must we go through it all over again? Madeline, I've forgiven and forgotten a lot of things since we've been married. I pushed you out in front. I've given you the spotlight. Watch your regard for me become somewhat less than for your servant, if somewhat more than for your dog. John, now look here. But this, if only for my self-respect, I will not allow the dangle before my eyes the thing that I wanted most in all the world except your beauty that I gave it up for. The thing I've been wanting so much I didn't dare admit it to myself. And then to have you snatch it from me, no matter, no, no. Waste lines and double chins can be concealed, but a mean spirit never. This one thing you can do for me, and you will.   But there's one thing you haven't known. Where I was, the night Nell Garrett was murdered. Where were you? I was at Nell Garrett's home. Well, that explains quite a number of things, doesn't it, John? Well, where did you get that gun? I always thought someday I might need one. Don't come near me, John. Very well, John, I warned you. You monster! He sank to the floor. He hurled the bowl of acid in my face. It was a frightful thing. Of course, it was self-defense. And I was never even brought to trial. Particularly when I told that it was he who killed poor Nell Garrett. But I suffered a complete nervous collapse. I suppose I never really recovered. And yet, Providence always seems kind to leave something to be thankful for, even in the worst of tragedies. Because, you know, not a single drop of acid ever touched me. I suppose if it had, I should be horribly disfigured to this day. Well, have I bored you, Mr. Zedling? Oh, no. Oh, no, Mr. Mane. Goodness gracious. Well, Madeline, the storm is almost over. I think we'd best push on. Must you? Well, excuse me for just a moment. Oh, of course, Madeline. Oh, my word. The poor woman. Yes, yes. I see. Look here. What is it? This mirror. It's not a mirror at all. It has a picture pasted in it. The photograph that's in the study. Oh, poor Madeline. Father Bentham, my mother would like to speak with you a moment before you go. Oh, yes, yes, of course. Very well. I'll only be a moment, Zedling. This way, Father. Thank you. Ah, Father. Well, Madeline. You may turn the lights on, Zed, as you go. Amen, Madeline. So that is your young curate, Father Bentham. Yes, do you like him? He seems like a dear boy, but... But what, Madeline? I'm afraid I can't see him again. Madeline, why? Well, I don't want to hurt his feelings. But it would not be the same. You have been my only true friend in all these years. And when you are gone, I would rather be alone again. I'm sorry, sir. But Mrs. Stoets is outside. Her little girl is dying in which he heard you were here. Go away. Madeline. Go away. Go, both. Come, sir. Go away. Go away. Good Lord. It was too much for her. Yes. Oh, she killed them both, of course. The woman and her husband. Oh, I think I always must have known it. All these years, she's lived a lie. Yes, but that's not the lie that's hurt her. It was the acid. Acid? Didn't you see her face, sir? You forget, my boy, that I am blind. She has no face. A Spence. Presented by Roma Wines. R-O-M-A, Roma. America's favorite wines. Before we hear again from Angela Lansbury, star of tonight's suspense play, this is Truman Bradley reminding you that in Roma wine, you enjoy an important difference, an extra dividend of pleasure in fuller bouquet, richer body, and better taste. Yes, Roma wines taste better, because Roma selects better tasting wines from the world's greatest wine reserves. Discover for yourself why more Americans enjoy Roma than any other wine. This weekend, serve Roma California Burgundy or Sautern with dinner. You'll agree that Roma is a premium wine in everything but price. And now, Angela Lansbury. Hello. I've had many a thrill myself listening to suspense, but I hope we were able to send a few chills up and down your spines tonight. I'm sure next week's program will, when Roma wines bring you Hume Cronin in Make Mad the Guilty. It's a real thriller, so don't miss it. Good night. Angela Lansbury appeared through arrangement with Metro Golden Mayor producers of High Barboury, starring Van Johnson and June Allison. Tonight's suspense play was written by Robert Richards from an original story by Elizabeth Heaston Heisch. Next Thursday, same time, you will hear Mr. Hume Cronin called Suspense, produced and directed by William Spear for the Roma Wine Company of Fresno, California. In the coming weeks, suspense will present such stars as June Havoc, Vincent Price, Marsha Hunt and others. Make it a point to listen each Thursday to suspense, Radio's Outstanding Theatre of Thrills. A famous name presents a great experience in taste luxury. C-R-E-S-T-A V-L-A-N-C-A Cresta Blanca Cresta Blanca Yes, for the most discriminating, Cresta Blanca offers two C-R-E-R California shirries, Dry Watch and Triple Cream. Compare Cresta Blanca Dry Watch and Triple Cream with the world's finest shirries, regardless of price. You'll find Cresta Blanca Dry Watch and Triple Cream unequaled in America, unsurpassed anywhere. Shenly's Cresta Blanca Wine Company, Livermore, California. Listen to suspense next week, same time, same station. This is CBS, the Columbia Broadcasting System.


Hey everyone welcome to this week's video update today is Friday December 8th Hope everybody had a good week taking a look at the markets, and then we'll jump into the trades for the week So S&P ending on a strong note. No surprise S&P your date up almost 20% now We are closing in on the high of the year which in ES was 46 34 and a half and And we closed today at 46 08 so getting close Nasdaq also close to its high of the year Actually hit it last week, but we're closing in on that as well Russell not as much Russell's only up about 7% year-to-date and the Dow it pushed above its yearly high last week and That was up 9% year-to-date Gold hit a new all-time high and then quickly retreated back down silver had a big push-up and then a big fall as well notes and bonds ended up high on the week, but Down the last couple days tenure yield settled in at 4.23 to the end of the week and Oil up 3% today, but a little bit lower on the week Natty gas red all week Soybeans choppy back and forth Wheat a little bit higher corn a little bit choppy on the week the euro Red on the week the pound red on the week and Bitcoin settled in right at 45,000 up 3% today big week Big week to the upside and Bitcoin is now up a hundred and seventy percent year-to-date All right, so those are let's a little quick look at the market one last thing Vix Settled in at 12.35. So a new new recent low here if we look at You know got down to around this level about 12.69 A little while ago. It's pushing new lows as of today 12.35. So Unfortunately, no volatility for you All right, so let's jump into the trades for the week starting with Let me get my trader sync up here So zero DTE starting with the AM ratio trades nice week for AM ratios plus 11,485 nine trades 77% win rate. So some of our other time frames making up for what's been a pretty non-existent power hour due to due to the low premiums But some of the AM and other time frames picking up the slack DKS, I'm not really trading anymore. I did take a discretionary one small $330 profit JSP's had two of those. Oops Had two of those both were winners one on Tuesday for 1600 one today for plus 1500 So a little over 3,100 on those two JSP trades power hour So I've been trading just minimal minimal size As you can see here Tiny size due to low premiums. That's been the theme recently. So I've just been just to kind of stay engaged. We stream every day for power hour So I want to kind of do something during the live stream. So just taking some very small trades just to Just to stay engaged but ended up down 3400 for the week on power hour trades three winners today This one is showing no profit, but that'll be a 780 dollar winner because I took that one to the bell So once those options settle, that'll be plus 780. So actually about 2600 on the loss total for power hour for the week and PM ratios Did okay as well Three trades two winners one loser 2100 on the PM's Quiet lunches Two trades one winner one loser small green. I don't think I took any reverse iron condors this week Yeah, no trades on Rick Dynamic butterflies. So this is this number is a little bit misleading.  So we'll see what happens with those next week Obviously a lot of events going on with CPI Bond auctions FOMC all the fun stuff employment data all kinds of stuff going on that next week All right, so that's it for calendars and then iron ducks Yeah, just opened one of those no closed trades Option selling very little happened there. I think I closed out one winner.  So nothing to report there The only other thing and these aren't trades that I share with the community beforehand yet, but my directional futures A little bit down on the week minus 786 So I'll be sharing more about what I'm doing with those in the coming weeks So that's it my friends. Hope everybody has a good weekend We'll be back at it next week with all kinds of economic reports. See you then