Fandal friends and family welcome in to what is the final Monday night football Q&A show here on the Fandal channel. I'm Ryan Williams. You can find me on Twitter at ryan Alexander underscore W and I'm joined as always by my usual friend and compadre Mr. Jim Sonnis himself. You can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis senior writer and analyst for number fire and Fandal Jim. How are we doing today man? Monday night football mix feelings because yesterday was a very good day for DFS had a lot of fun with some Jomar Chase, Daryl Williams, Devin Singletary. Those guys did well for me.  So conflicted feelings here because like excited with how yesterday went. Hope we can, you know, duplicate that for today, but also sad that like next Monday afternoon, I have no idea what I'm going to be doing as opposed to talking to you. Right. Exactly. Yeah. I mean, well, I guess we'll just be talking about how our Sunday lines went to finish up the season as we're trying to figure out, you know, what rookies and what who are going to be playing and what studs are going to be coming into the mix. So it should be a fun, full game of Sunday. But yeah, it'll be a nice little off off day for Monday. We got back to back off days on Monday with the holiday being on the 17 two. So it'll be a nice little wind down season as we prepare for playoffs. But Jim, we got week 17 to close it out here tonight. We got the Cleveland Browns traveling into Pittsburgh to take on the Steelers and what should be an interesting one? We've talked about this in kind of the pre show here about how to target this game in general. And as we always do, let's talk started off by talking about the single game slate as we have one team who's pretty much not playing for anything and another team that could be potentially playing for everything. I mean, a win here is is still keeping the Steelers playoff hopes alive. They really, you know, could he use some help with the Raiders losing yesterday, but they spoiled the fun there. So we got a flex game with the Raiders and Chargers next Sunday that could be for everything depending on what happens in Colts Jags. So this is going to be a fun slate to break down. We'll start it off here for the single game slate on Fandle. And guys, if you're coming in, make sure you get your questions in, whether you're watching YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, we appreciate everybody rocking along. Starting off in the chat, Jim, we got Grim fan who's coming in no Monday next week. Yeah, Grim, there's there's no Monday night football next week. Everybody's playing on Sunday. So, you know, maybe hit us up on Twitter and we'll we'll talk about some things as it over the Sunday and get prepped for the playoffs. But but yeah, there's no no Monday night football action here, but we do have the final game tonight. And Jim, as we kind of break this down, I see you pulled up the single game slate there. Kind of what are your initial reactions here? I've seen a lot of people kind of talking about this game, maybe being a little bit of a slower game than, you know, that we're used to. And especially with these island games, we know that the unders are usually ones that we tend to lean on Thursday night football, Sunday night football and Monday night. But I saw the action moving towards the over a little bit. I believe this game is now at 43 and a half on the Fandals Sportsbook. It opened at 42 with it being in Cleveland's favor. Now we know it's in Pittsburgh's favor. A lot of narrative around this game. What are you taking from everything, Jim? As we talk about the slate, it's really weird to watch how much the spread has moved in this game. And that does influence a lot for the single game DFS slate. So that's why I'm bringing them up here. That's why we're not talking about the betting aspect of this game just yet. But seeing this number open at Steelers plus three and a half and now being Steelers minus two and a half, mostly due to motivation changes, which you alluded to where Cleveland has now been eliminated, where it's Pittsburgh could still make it. Six points is a lot. I know it's not across like, it did cross three, that's one key number, but like, you know, two, one, zero, one, two, those aren't really key numbers. So it's not like, you know, a change in that respect, but like, it's still six points and still cross three. So that's a really big movement. And I don't really know if that's, that's like how I think it kind of overreacted here, I guess is kind of, you know, where I'm at, I think that it's been an overreaction. So when I'm looking at the single game slate, I think, okay, if I believe the public is overreacting to the Browns being eliminated, I could say, okay, I think the Browns will win. The problem is, it sounds like cream hunt is going to play and that negatively impacts Nick Chubb. I would still expect Nick Chubb to have a good role for tonight. They're facing a Steelers defense that is really struggled against the Rush, but he does objectively just get downgraded with cream hunt being in there because there's just less work for him to get. So it's kind of hard for me to be like, okay, I think the public is overreacting. I'm going to go to the Brown side here, you know, get Nick Chubb at MVP, et cetera, et cetera, because he does get downgraded with cream hunt being there. So honestly, Ryan, and I think this is reflecting the projections over a number fire, I don't really know where to go at MVP. They've got Najee Harris is having the top projection, but you've got three guys all within two and a half points of him, Deontay Johnson, right there too. So honestly, I think it's pretty wide open at MVP. And if you just give me one line up, I think pretty hard about where I want to go because I don't think there's one clear route you must go at MVP for tonight. Yeah, I mean, I think that the running backs both at the top here with Chubb 16,000, 15,000 for Najee, they're going to be, I mean, that's where the game starts, you know, people are going to, I feel like worry about missing out on the scores from them. I do feel like that this game is going to lend to more passing action than we expect. So I am interested in the wider receivers a lot more so than the running backs, just because of the touchdowns don't get there. I mean, Najee is one thing and Najee is probably the guy who I would put in a lineup before Chubb as crazy as that sounds. I agree. Even with I think I am still interested in Chubb if Karim Hunt comes back just because he's only played two games since week six. But Najee, I mean, we saw last week against the Kansas City Chiefs, they were getting the doors blown off of them and this dude still just sees the field. I mean, there is nobody competing for snaps with him at all. So it's tougher to not put him in and we know that Ben likes to, you know, dump it off short and he could be used in the red zone. So I'm still looking to get Najee there. I do think putting him at captain makes a ton of sense on the slate today because if the touchdowns are coming for Pittsburgh, they'll just lean on the run.  So if Cleveland gets up big, you know, in the beginning, then I think that Chubb MVP lines can make sense. I pretty much want to just stay away from Chubb MVP lines with him being the highest priced guy on the slate and a much more apt to take the receivers on the receivers on the Cleveland side. Yeah, I think that what you said there is kind of a key thing. He's the highest salary guy and Brandon Gadull has done a lot of research into golf stuff where the highest salary golfer, the betting odds favorite tends to be the most heavily rostered guy. So if we look at Nick Chubb here at $16,000, I think that despite the fact we've seen a lot of movement towards Pittsburgh, I wouldn't be shocked if he is the most popular MVP, which is another reason to potentially not be as high on him, you know, in addition to Cream Hunt being healthy for, or healthy-ish, healthier for this game. Some of you where I think that to me, I'd like to be underway on Nick Chubb MVP relative to the field. I do still think that, you know, it's worthwhile to have some Chubb lineups in there because if the Browns win this game, he's going to do well, but having fewer of them than the field, I think is the preferred way to go here. The problem is, like, if I'm not going with Chubb at MVP, like, what are the Browns can I put there? Like, can I actually go Baker? Like, I don't want to. I can because like, I know that, like, from a projections perspective, he's pretty close to the top. He's actually the highest projected Browns player for tonight. So like, in theory, I should be okay with him, but like, it doesn't feel good. So I guess I would go Baker, but like, nobody on Cleveland is really that attractive. So I think that like, yeah, I agree with you where I do want to be underweight on Chubb at MVP, but it's so hard to talk myself into other guys. I will go Baker because I think people have the same sentiment as me where they don't want to use him, but like, I just don't feel good about it, even though I know it's probably the smart way to go. No, yeah. I mean, I've been looking and playing around and it is tough, Jim, because I mean, you see, I got the Steelers for Brown today. So I think people can defer from that that I am going to go with some Steelers onslaught lineups here tonight with me, only usually playing about three to five lineups when it comes to these single game slates.  They're really, you know, everything's going to be about this being Ben's last home game in Heinz Field and they've had a lot of success against this team in his career. So I think that Baker will be forced to throw and we have seen them give up some big playability or big play scores to opposing wide receiver Zandor tight ends in recent games with the way the secondary is playing. So he does carry some merit there and I think he's great leverage off of a guy like Nick Chubb. If the passing touchdowns do come through the air in Cleveland, that's just great leverage there as most people will probably try and get Baker and Chubb into a lineup instead of, you know, if they have to choose for one or the other, I think people have a hard time clicking Baker over Chubb's name. So I don't like it from the standpoint of how I think the game's going to go, but I will have a team that has Baker and probably two pass cutters with Najee as captain or Najee as MVP. It doesn't feel good, but like it is just based on like the what the numbers are saying. We should do it.  Absolutely, absolutely. So let's talk about both of these sides here as we're kind of getting into the slate and shout out to everybody who's coming into the chat. I want to bring DJ Cassie and asking about, you know, any odds boost for tonight. I did see that right now the only odds boost for this game is the Steelers and Browns to each score one rushing touchdown and one passing touchdown. That's boosted to plus 420. I think that's a pretty solid boost from 320. You're getting another hundred on top of that. We, you know, if you think that chub and or Kareem Hunt can find the end zone on the ground Baker throws to any one of these guys, I think we can, I feel confident in Najee and or you know, whoever else would rush a touchdown for the Steelers and get a pass touchdown there through four quarters. So I, and I like the over in this game. I should throw that out there as well too, which is leading me to go to this boost because I do think points will be scored. So plus 420, I think is a nice bet DJ if you want to get behind that. I'm sure as we get closer to the slate locking we will have another odds booster too for the game.  Lots have been made about been been Rothesburgers passing touchdown prop. I was talking about it. I saw the boy Tom Beckio talking about it. Tom's a sharp guy. So I was happy that he could give me, you know, a little confidence there. It was plus money for him to throw for two or more touchdowns, which is now at minus 102, I believe on the Fandalsports book. That's still pretty nice to get that number on him. So those are the bets that I was looking at. Yeah. The one I like is also been related. It's moving though. So if you want it, I would get it now. That's over 235 and a half passing yards for Ben Rothesburg and it's not because of the narrative of this being likely his final home game. It's because not sure they'll be able to run. And so like if you're just doing math, thinking about this, like, okay, probably 350 yards, something like that, you know, that might be a high projection, whatever. Like, are they really going to get 120 on the ground? I'm not sure that they will, based on the way this team operates. So 235 and a half, it was 233 earlier on. So that's been rising. But I think that still, there is still value there on Ben's over passing yardage prop. So I think the touchdown prop is also in play for sure. Because like if you look at a Najee, and this actually does impact some stuff for Najee, not over thinking it, but like, so Najee Harris recently has not had a 40% red zone share since week number six. And he had a 40% red zone share in every game to that point. So they've been throwing a lot in the red zone, and they've been criticized for that. But that does lend itself to some passing touchdown props for Ben as well. So I think that one works for sure. I've for the passing yardage one, because it's, you know, a little bit like smoother, I guess is the right to phrase it, but like the number on the over for touchdown passes is pretty good. Yeah, no, I love that.  I think he's only lost two games versus this team at home.  I wanted to bring in Aaron Rasmus's question here on fan, or on Facebook that's coming in here. And Aaron, shout out to you for coming in. Happy New Year. Happy New Year to you as well, man. We're getting getting some action here on the Monday night football game. And he was asking about just, you know, the previous matchup and kind of really having that core of these guys. And you're looking at the core here of Najee, Deontay, Pat Fryer move, Nick Chubb, Landry.  If you're building cash games, you would want to be thinking those guys first. Tough to jam all in. He's asking about if Hunt is out. Maybe we can go Deionis Johnson. Deionis Johnson is not a guy that I have been targeting at all in Cleveland games. It's just Nick Chubb or Bust. It seems like with his team and they have been in some interesting first half game scripts where, you know, they do get out to a lead or can get Chubb going early and then he's able to just get over that 100 yard threshold and really make it a score that you feel comfortable with having. Are you interested in Deionis Johnson at all, Jim, if Karim Hunt is officially rolled out? Yeah, I think there are better lower salary plays we can turn to if there's no Karim Hunt. You know, Johnson did have 66 yards in scrimmage last week, but that was a couple, I believe, broken screens that led to that high total. Only four carries and two targets in that game. And I also do expect Hunt to play. So, you know, I think that to me, John's not really on my radar. I think there are other guys I would turn to as some lower salary plays. Not just like the guy who I would point to first as being a guy who is kind of under side is Ray Ray McLeod. Eight targets this past week. Eight targets tweaked before that as well. Only three in week 15, but we've seen Chase Clay Poole's role take a pretty serious hit recently. If we look at the past four games here, Ray Ray McLeod has a 17 percent target share that's actually second on the team behind just Deontay Johnson. It's above Chase Clay Poole. It is above Najee Harris. Friar Muth obviously missed one of those games, but Ray Ray McLeod actually has a legitimate role. Downfield targets recently. He had two red zone targets last week too. So, he's on the field. They need some like kind of funky stuff to make the offense work because it's not good. So, like honestly, if I'm looking for like a salary saver and Eric, if you want a salary saver to help jam in those guys, I think that McLeod is $6,500. Probably the way I would go here. Is that too far for you, Ryan, or are you interested in McLeod too? No. I mean, it is interesting just when I'm trying to build teams in here where you're looking at, you know, like just throw it in. You know, Najee, Rothless, Berger, Deontay, Landry, if you don't want to get chub. Perfect. Yeah. Well, yeah, that's perfect. And I was even going to say Baker is actually interesting there when Najee has captain, but playing thin over Baker.  So, I do think that's, I mean Claypool has not been what we thought he was going to be coming into 2021 based off of his 2020 year. His antics have pretty much just, you know, the transit of property has happened from Antonio Brown to Chase Claypool. Basically just feeling that void for them, for him. I mean, the antics have been there. Him and Tomlin have been getting into it, you know, disappointing Rothblisberger on some of the drops here. It's just been not a fun season for him, but he is seeing the field, you know, so I think I will have to talk myself into having some Claypool exposure, but I do like getting Rayward McLeod at, you know, little ownership based off of what we think, especially if people are down on the passing attack for the Steelers. I think he's interesting. I do think I wanted to talk about the Cleveland wide receivers as well too, Jim, as we talk about, I think Jarvis Landry, you know, he's a guy that I always try to get into lineups when they're playing Pittsburgh. I think for whatever reason this guy just loves going up against Pittsburgh and has in his career. And so even at 11k, I feel confident in getting to him, but these ancillary guys for Cleveland, I'm trying to figure out how to decipher them because we got DPJ, Donovan Peoples Jones, Rashad Higgins, and then the guy Anthony Schwartz who Anthony Schwartz saw, you know, his snap count go up last week and they've already been talking about him getting more run as they close the season to try and figure out what they have in him. And he's 6k on the single game slate. I am interested in getting some exposure to Anthony Schwartz if people aren't too privy to that news. Yeah, I was, I hope, so I opened up the player pool and was like, okay, I want to see where Donovan Peoples Jones is because he gets downfield targets, he's pretty athletic and he's the type of player I like target. He's also three downfield targets, now three consecutive games. Two of those were where a lot of guys were out but then you both at the player pool and you see that he's only $500 less than Jarvis Landry and it's like, okay, well, there goes that idea. Like that's, the gap there is not big enough. Now with that said, that could lead to people just saying, okay, I don't want DPJ. I should just go to Jarvis. So maybe there is like a tournament based strategy where you go with DPJ as a result of the downfield work as a result the fact that he will be lower rostered than Jarvis. I think Jarvis obviously the straight up better play. Maybe you can talk yourself into DPJ just as a result of likely depressed roster rates there. As far as other guys on this team, I mean, Higgins is a guy Baker is trusted for a very long time. He is, I think he's like, he's not the most like talented football player, but he is a good football player. He gets open, you know, and like Baker trusts him. Is that enough for me to be like pounding the table for him? Maybe, because like, you know, last week they had everyone back and he still had six targets in that game. Maybe that's enough. So I think that like he's, he's somewhat interesting and I could get there. Do you have a preference between Higgins and Schwartz? I think that they're both at least like, we're discussing here. Yeah, I like Schwartz, I think, for the relief that he offers as far as salary goes. Higgins is just, he's good when there's not somebody else there who can compete for targets.   We kind of know what they have in People's Jones and they've liked them over the past couple of years. Maybe they just let, you know, Higgins and Schwartz run it out, you know, late in the third quarter, all of the fourth quarter and then he has some merit there. But if this game is competitive, like Jarvis and DPJ are not leaving the field. And then we got three tight ends who are healthy from them and we know how much Cleveland loves to run 12 personnel and, you know, tight ends against Pittsburgh is kind of a thing. So, and vice versa on the other side. So I am interested in the tight ends in general in this game as well. So that just leads me to not play Higgins pretty much at all today. I think that's probably the right way to go. And like, you know, when I was up on Schwartz's page, there was a report from early this week about how like they want to get him more involved. They want to see what he can do. And like, why not? He's been in another lineup. So yeah, I think that Schwartz of Higgins to me pretty easy call. I think that Schwartz in the same realm as McLeod where he's like a super low salary guy who does give you a lot of relief there. Yeah. No, absolutely. And so before we, I do kind of want to touch on the Cleveland tight ends, Jim, but I think more importantly, let's talk about the stealer side. And if, you know, I'm touting Ben Rothesburger throwing over one and a half touchdowns. Okay. So who are those touchdowns going to? How good is Deontay Johnson been this year?  I believe he's leading the team in red zone targets with 27. Second on the team is Pat Fryermuth with 18. I think those are the two guys that I want to start my lineups with that have been Rothesburger on them. We talked about Raven McLeod. We talked about Chase Claypool. Are you okay with playing? I guess it's really playing Deontay Johnson at this expensive Najee Harris unless you're building onslaughts and try and fit them both with some of the cheap Cleveland options. I think you have to choose for one, choose one or the other. Would you be more apt to take Deontay in some lineups than Najee? Yeah, I think so because like the question is more so to me like how often can I go Deontay at MVP? Because I think that like his range of outcomes is good enough to justify that as being worth a discussion. You go over here to the number fire projections obviously. He's ranked fifth in this game in terms of projections but like there is an easy path to him having the highest score in this game. You look back to a couple weeks ago against the Ravens 26.5 Fanido points. He had 95 yards week before that so like he can put up yardage. He can score touchdowns as you mentioned. The red zone uses there is very good for him. So honestly, I think it's more the bigger question for me is how often I go to MVP with him over Najee and like I think it's decently often like let's say you give me 10 lineups and I have to use those to an MVP. I probably go like six to four in favor of Najee. Like I think that to me they're pretty close. So yeah, I'm very comfortable going with Yonte over Najee just because the volume will be there and that the volume is the main appeal for Najee. So like the volume is the main appeal on both guys and trying to decide who will be the more efficient between the two and honestly like it could be either guys. I want to account for that my allocation of exposure to MVP. Yeah, absolutely. And just the role that he has in the offense I mean Ben just absolutely trusts him with no avail which is you know pretty much a drecklin hide scenario. I mean he was forced to trust him because Antonio Brown was gone last year and he needed somebody to step up but just with the drops in everything that Deontay was dealing with last year it's compared to you know what's happened this year I think is is a huge testament to you know his his role on the team and just what he's been able to do okay Jim as we're getting here pretty much like five minutes left and shout to everybody who's getting the questions in here in the chat we appreciate you guys rocking along with us here on the Monday night football Q&A I want to bring in Hunter Ling Ling Gill I think that's how I'm saying at Hunter if not you know you can always correct me in the chat but he's asking any concern with the Browns having nothing to play for I think that's a concern for both Jim and I on this side it's gonna it's gonna really be hard for me to play more than three Browns I guess in a lineup so really that's like me playing Baker with two past catchers and and Najee at MVP is the only way that I'll probably get to three Browns if usually probably only building lineups with one or two of them in there it's just tough especially how they've played against this team in the past do you agree Jim or am I speaking for you well it's not just that but I think the bigger concern for me with having a lot of Browns in there is that they spread stuff out so much like they just use a lot of to do like it's not it's not a situation where you get Jarvis Landry with a 40% target show you don't get Nick Chubb getting every single rush and target out of the backfield whereas with the Steelers you do get that Najee get that from Deontay Johnson so just naturally you're gonna favor the Steelers over the Browns anything the Browns win I think that like you're gonna wind up having a lot of interest in the in those Steelers guys so yeah I agree to you and I think that there are multiple reasons to do that I think the one route like let's say you think the Browns win this game the one route to having four Browns is including Chase McLaughlin their kicker I think that if you put him not at MVP that's just the way I click don't put him in MVP let's put Baker at MVP we've a Baker at MVP you do have like a negative correlation because like every Baker touchdown means it's not a field goal from McLaughlin but like I think that that situation where you could feel better about having hypothetically four Browns in there and you got 10,000 left on the table that's not too bad so I think that's the one route to having four Browns but for the most part my skew will be towards Steelers more so due to the concentrated usage than just the fact the Browns in theory have nothing to play for now yeah I like that that makes a ton of sense there and we did we didn't even talk about the kickers but I do like getting some exposure to Chris Boswell if the Steelers unable to convert I guess Chase on the other side too although it does always seem like opposing kickers do we have a hard time in Hines field so yeah that's something that kind of keeping in mind plus we're looking at Cleveland getting in red zone opportunities red zone areas for the opportunities so that's always tough for me to bank on but that's interesting I wanted to bring Aaron Rasmus back in for Facebook he's asking about fading or talking about fading both quarterbacks in this matchup and I absolutely do love that from a game narrative scenario you know we're not getting a high over under total in this game at 43 and a half if we get you know the touchdowns coming from Chub and Najee and only you know let's a Baker only throws for one touchdown and only throws for one and you get the guys right or even if you know if Baker throws the touchdown to a guy who you don't need to have there is some merit to having these running backs without the quarterbacks and I do think that will be you know a great tournament lineup to make so on board with that as well Aaron yeah and branding a duelist and research on single game slates and he found that the lower the scoring the more likely it is the kickers are in the lineup and kickers are in the lineup because teams are not converting red zone trips into touchdowns and that's bad for quarterbacks so I think that the both of those things tying together you bump up kickers and low total games bump down quarterbacks now it could be like you said Ryan this game could go over which case we do want to get to the quarterbacks potentially there but if you if Aaron sounds like you think this game will be lower scoring if you think that that bumps up kickers and bumps down quarterbacks yes absolutely would definitely have a kicker if not to in a lineup where you're not playing the quarterbacks there real quickly I saw Grim fan hop in here on youtube with a question about the Titans I did say we will touch on this Austin Hooper Harrison Bryant David and Joku all likely to suit up for Cleveland today do you have a sense on where we can project the ball to go I think actually the red zone targets go in Joku Hooper and Brian if I'm not mistaken I think in Joku has about 15 red zone targets and 10 for Austin Hooper I had it written down here and I'll look it up as you're as you're yeah 15 it's actually 15 for Hooper 10 for in Joku three for Harrison Bryant do you have a read on these guys at all Jim I think that like if you think it's a bit higher scoring I would want to go in Joku because like he's the guy with the better like big play upside so that would push me towards him but if you think it's more of a straightforward game that would lead me towards Hooper so I I don't know I tend to like in Joku just because like he does get some downfield targets and I tend to like that it means he can pay off pretty quickly 14 total downfield targets four in Joku so far this year Hooper has four Harrison Bryant has five so I kind of like in Joku from that perspective because I do like the ability to get some good yardage on one throw yes yes I I tend to agree I would most likely lean David in Joku is actually $500 cheaper than Austin Hooper so to speak but these tight ends are so hard to predict so it makes me it makes it tough to project any of these guys but I guess if I'm building around with these Baker lines I should play around with a tight ender too to see what comes out of there Chris Gourley coming in on Facebook needs Deontay Johnson to stay under 13 points to win a championship I guess you know standard or PPR Chris is kind of what I say if it's standard you might have a chance there if things are flowing a different way but PPR that's going to be a tough tough bout but you know crazier things have happened so good luck to you and your championship sir we'll be pulling for you over here it's PPR so good luck to you I got word for you here that you're able to do it I actually need some Deontay Johnson magic on my end but I'll root for you Chris you coming in on the chat supporting the channel so I'll definitely root for you man and hopefully we can make some money on the fan dual single game slate guys that's gonna wrap it up for us I think real quickly oh there were a couple questions Jim just about James Washington I know you mentioned Ray Ray McLeod Ray James McLeod sounds way cooler yeah think about changing your name Ray Ray any read on James Washington who you know he's really it seems like he's utilized in spurts you know kind of kind of out there when you know especially when Claypool's having antics and causing you know penalties they bring them in and you know Ben will look at them but much more of a of a rapport with Mason Rudolph the backup quarterback and I think that's when he comes in and really has his shine but any read on him today yeah I mean like he's an option he's $7,500 whatever it is so like you could you could go there he gets targets he can get some downfield looks like you could go there I just don't have a huge preference for him it's more of like a I'm praying on a deep ball and like I'm kind of doing that in joku too so like whenever but I think that for me personally I'm higher on the cloud than I am on James Washington that I mean Washington could very well outscore him because like neither guy gets a lot of work but I think I'd rather take some shots in the cloud personally just because I wouldn't expect a ton of people to be on him for this game fair enough yeah and I think James Washington has earned a little bit more of you know that equity of people wanting to play him for not missing out on that if he does you know catch a touchdown there and this could be a game where touchdowns you know do come at a premium so just by getting the right guy you could be setting yourself up in good position guys that's going to do it here for the final Monday night football Q and A here on the FanDuel channel it's been a fun season rocking along this actually being my first season rocking along with you guys on the FanDuel channel so it's been fun Jim I appreciate you you know giving me giving me the the drive the driving Ed you know I got the steering wheel but you're in the passenger seat and you kind of got the steering wheel too just in case things go off the rail so I appreciate you coming in I appreciate Justin who was you know filling in for you as well rocking along as well too it's been a fun one guys and hopefully we can make some more money tonight on the Monday night football single game slate guys make sure you're also going over to the FanDuel sportsbook and putting some bets down there we talked about the boost there should be more coming also a fun one just to get action on Jim any final words for the team for the season for everybody who's been joining us now it's a blast having you along for the first year obviously did a good job filling in not just for this but also with the Sunday Q and A's needed those too so like you know happy to have season one under the books and I'm excited for season two coming just around the corner which is upsetting to think about that like September is not that far away but I'm excited to to run it back with you again next year yeah nine nine months not that far away what are you talking about yeah there's no off season here for us that FanDuel we have a ton planned for you guys in 2022 so we appreciate everybody who's been rocking along and trust us when we say that there's a lot more to come but you know we still got week 17 before we can officially close out the season next week for week 18 again no Monday night football Q and A next week but we'll still have some stuff on the YouTube channel guys make sure you are subscribed to our YouTube channel to get all of that content you can hit that notification bell as well to get the notifications when we go live so you never miss anything signing off for Jim Sonnis you can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis I'm Ryan Williams you can find me on Twitter at Ryan Alexander underscore W and we'll catch you guys next time FanDoleFam until then get this money peace


्... if you're going there to pursue something it is fine but you're going there to make dollars and send it back please don't waste your life like that. Unfortunately one ingredient that is really weak in India right now is integrity. If you think you have integrity please stay in India, we don't want one more to escape. सद्पूरु आर वो अक जो दाना काता पता वो रईिवार्स और की नो 레�ओ। wherever I go there for all the abled people I see आद्यार लगासाव्ड़ानी अगते है, खेर मेंक्रा सासवी आपटा लिका कर से नजबामे जलना थे.. देखना वो करते लिए करते है कर देरा वाई और कर चाम गाना आपारोगा बुलेग चाएस जीः आपारोगा घरणा है, चंजाई में ल देखाई येंनी ज़ाए ती को भैत्द हैं। धाई के नहीं मीते तिन्चाओ, देखाई यें ताई की मेंगो माची ती बी, वेद़ितिन और में नहीं धाई की मोगक लगी रहीं, मी त्चो फाँगा लेग से जाए मेंगवे़ देखाई, तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ तुछ � We're working against each other at so many levels. Okay? Our energies are simply spent throwing things at each other all the time. If you don't understand what I am saying, just turn on one of the English news channels and watch in the evening. How much energy, simply wasted, simply saying rubbish against each other endlessly. mammals And slowly we are losing all sense of civilization in this argument. We think we are debating. No, we are just shouting abuses at each other and think we are debating. A debate means to explore, to use two brains instead of one, to explore something. That is a debate. Not simply throwing things at each other is not debate. We can as well throw stones at each other. of hurling abuses at least it will end soon. So this is going on immense waste of energy, no cleanliness, when i say no cleanliness, a whole lot of people are simply innocent of integrity. They're not corrupt theyre just innocent of integrity. They don't know what it is. because we are a nation who are not controlled by any moral code. Nobody told us, thou shall not do this or that. Nobody told us. But in this culture, we've managed ourselves by constantly stirring up human consciousness in every generation. Well, you also come from the land of gurus because the idea is to stir up human consciousness rather than give you a set of morals to follow because morals can be subverted by anybody. But when it arises within you, it's a natural expression of who you are. So, this has been the process. But over a period of time, because of invasions and occupations, this system of transmitting consciousness or invigorating human consciousness, those systems have largely collapsed. So, this process of what shall I do? Should I go there and send dollars? If you are going there to pursue something, it is fine. If you think there is some form of skill or education or knowledge or even a profession which is not available here, you want to go there, it is fine. But you are going there to make dollars and send it back. Please don't waste your life like that. There is so much to be done here. If you have integrity, why I am focusing on integrity is this has been a scarce thing. Whether it is politics or any profession, including spirituality, unfortunately one ingredient that is really weak in India right now is integrity. If you think you have integrity, please stay in India. We don't want one more to escape. I didn't say.