Okay, one housekeeping information. Tomorrow we will have some sort of karaoke singing too, so those people who are interested in that should make up a list of songs that they would like to have played so that the disc jockey can prepare for this. So all of the karaoke fans and great singers that we have among the people here they should just make a list, this song, that song and so forth and then things will work out fine, I'm sure. As far as the rules of questions and answer session goes, you can address individuals on the panel, you can address the panel as a whole, and all the panelists can comment on each other as well. And please wait always until the microphone arrives at your place before you ask your questions. You can ask whatever you want, whatever you wanted to know about sex or money or so, these are our competent people. Alright, so Jay will carry the microphone, point out that you are one of the questioners, and then he will arrive at you. Professor Gabb, thank you for your presentation. I spoke with you briefly during the break about this, but for people that are very interested in the private production of security and defense, I had mentioned of how outsourcing the Navy actually created a problem for the existence of the empire, and I was wondering if you had any further thoughts about that dynamic. Oh, thank you. It is a problem when you outsource what are called the core functions of the state, or it is a problem whenever you rely on somebody apart from yourself to manage defense. What we do is either we outsource our defense to the state, or the state takes away from us the right to our defense and exercises it for us, and equally if a state decides to outsource its defense, you are putting yourselves into the hands of some people who may have their own interests, or who will have their own interests, and those interests may not be entirely aligned with your own interests. The Byzantine state believed that if it outsourced its naval support to a foreign power to Venice, then it would receive exactly what it wanted and neither more nor less, and it got a great deal more than it expected. I don't think this is a problem with the outsourcing by a state of some aspects of its defense.  The rather effete, the rather useless Byzantine ruling class of the late 11th century never really thought that the Venetians would have an alternative interest from their own. A degree of vanity, a degree of vanity which you often see with individuals. A question for Andreas regarding guns. Are there any historical examples you're aware of where the government demanded citizens surrender their weapons and they refused? Are you aware of any historical situations where the government demanded citizens surrender their weapons and they refused? As far as I know there have been in the last few years some attempts, especially for instance in New Zealand, to buy back semi-automatic guns after this event when some Muslims have been killed by a maniac. As far as I know it has been successful, a lot of people gave back their weapons, but in fact I doubt that you really can increase the security by buying back some special weapons. I think in Canada a similar program has been run, but I do not know about any details and what effect this kind of gathering weapons had. As far as I know not in the last time, I cannot imagine what would have been done by the American citizens for instance in the 19th century any president would have come up with a program to take away their weapons. So I think that could have been causing a revolution because the Americans have another site on their property especially on their weapons as the Europeans have. But in Austria as far as I know there has been 40 years ago or so, 30 years ago when they forbade the special kind of weapons, these pump gun shotguns. The dealers said that approximately 40,000 of these weapons have been sold until that point of time and just 10,000 have been given back or the people like me demanded a special permit and that means that at least 30,000 of these weapons are illegal now and I think not a single crime has been perpetrated with these now illegal weapons. But to answer the question that people did not really give a lot of resistance, they just kept it and kept secrets so they did not tell anybody that they own such a gun. Also a question for Andreas Turgel or anyone else who would like to answer. Will the 3D printing of guns or the ability for citizens to make their own guns with new technology, is that likely to change anything? I can do it in German. So in German I think the question was if people could make their own weapons, if that could change anything. So there is of course the possibility to produce your own weapons as soon as you have the equipment nobody can hinder you that you produce it. But it's not a big problem to get real guns available on the black market. Austria is located very close to the balcony and three years ago there has been a perpetrator who killed some people in the inner city of Vienna and he got an AK-47 from the balcony without any problem and the ammunition. So I think it's not worthwhile to do a lot of effort to create your own weapon because you can buy whatever you want if you just look around and get the connections. I have a question for Mr. Model. I was wondering because you said that there was a lot of obviously neglect of the psychological aspects of governing people as such by the government and then somehow they switched to now use exactly the human psyche talking about fear during COVID. Do you think one could argue that in fact they use the psychological psyche of the individuals all the time by talking about being altruistic or by talking about having to help each other and being as you mentioned yourself you know using the solidarity curse word as such towards the individuals maybe even just talking about Switzerland. Yeah that's a good point. It has a certain dramaturgy in my speech to let's say show the tipping point between ignoring and overstressing and I can only agree to what you say in a way it really shows how there is a lack of line. The whole policy is full of contradiction and the moralization for example is not really I mean it's not a heartfelt thing basically because this being I tried to describe has no heart and the more we should not listen to the moral arguments because they are fake and what is interesting on my point is to see in the process of time a certain degeneration and a certain acceleration at the same time and my wife just told me I haven't given you so to speak my point of the forecast I thought I did say but I didn't elaborate on that and maybe just one sentence saying that within the next three to five years what we see I think we will see a falling apart of institutions. Of course you can say we already see it. If you observe it closely we see a falling apart of institutions and that is quite dramatic and I think you can now do your own forecasts regarding what kind of institutions and where it starts first. I think a very interesting phenomenon is the United States. There are people who are more in the Anglo-Saxon world specialist but what I see is we have there at least an open civil war and we have an abuse of institutions and that is very interesting and it could again be the leader of what is happening in Europe for the next coming years. I'd like to add to that thought that if institutions break down and are likely to break down that is a chance for others to go into that vacuum because the institutions are there for a reason. They've grown over long history and were then captured by the state and so when they break down, when they break apart, when they disappear that is then a time for people who are aware and know what's happening to build these institutions or replacement of these institutions from the ground up. Following up Robert, thank you for your speech and you mentioned at the outset about the aspect of being ingrained in our nature that when you withdraw from one covenant you immediately seek another. Can you elaborate on the ingrained in our nature aspect? Okay, in terms of how North would say that we're made that way, so we're created that way, that we recognize we need a sovereign, we look for authority, our actions have to be, because we're imperfect, we need some guidance through the laws and the sanctions belong to that like two sides of a coin and we have an outlook. We always think, well we're not always, but we are working, we're thinking about the future. What are our plans? So I'm simply observing that. I'm not founding this on any other philosophy. It's just an observation that this appears to be ingrained in us and so the only way to get away from one sovereign is to find another and as I then explained, well if you think you don't have one, you think yourself is, you are the sovereign of your own making and ignore everything else that other people are saying or doing or think you can rule yourself and well that's probably an error. Looks like it at least. Question for Doug. Do you think there exist also movements that did not turn into rackets? Sorry. What was that? You talked about how movements are turned into rackets. Are there also movements that did not turn into rackets? Well thank you, Dr. Hoppe. No, it's hard to imagine, even with the best intentions, you'd need angels who are running these organizations and there was a wise man who once told me, for instance, no tank, no think. In other words, if you want to think tank then if you want anybody to do any thinking then you have to go raise the money to do it but then the money becomes the sole mission. Again, it's not altogether too different than the private sector. Probably the private sector is since you are providing a service or a good where people pay directly for that good then that is not a scam. Whereas in the nonprofit sector and the political sector you raise money from one group of people and give it to another and give the service or the funds to another group of people and that's always the issue with nonprofits in general. Your customers are not the same as the donors. You have one group of people who give you the money and another group of people who use those resources. So I think it is only in the private capitalist society that a movement or a need for a good is a case where it wouldn't turn into a scam. So that means the PFS is not a racket. But only to be used for other conferences where the same people come who give the money. So in that sense we do exactly what private business does. The consumers are the payers. Correct. In the case of PFS if that is what you are referring to. So that means we are angels. Yes, you are. And I assume that is what you would have taken that from my comment. Yes, the doctors are angels and they take the money and they only reach out for your funds when they have a fabulous product to provide you. And it's not a situation where haunts and gulchins are constructing pyramids so to speak in downtown Istanbul or here in Bodrum for underemployed academics to stand around and do deep thinking. We are offered something. We provide funds willingly. And we come and enjoy the fruits of that. And as 16 years has proven, that good is well worth it and is certainly not a scam. And it wouldn't have lasted 16 years and hopefully 16 more or 32 more or 48 more. How long are you going to live since you are an angel? I haven't decided yet. I have a question for Daniel Modell and Dr. Grötzinger. Both your speeches reminded me of a famous speech of Jesus Huerta de Soto, God is Libertarian. And he made a very funny parallel between the story of Samuel, the biblical story, the one who was the first giver of the first king to Israel, the king Saul, and the temptations of Christ. And at the end the devil says to Christ, I will lay all the governments of the world on your feet if you accept to serve me. And so Huerta de Soto concludes that governments are the incarnations of the devil on earth.  So I would like a comment on this from both of you. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Yeah, the Samuel story is interesting in that before then the Israelites had no king and they wanted a king because the others had a king. It doesn't quite clear why, but that's the reason they give. And Samuel warns them and says, the king will be dreadful. He will take taxes, I'm paraphrasing, he will take taxes. He will take, believe that, 10% of your income. And so, but they go ahead anyway and in that passage God says to Samuel, let them go ahead, they'll see what they'll get from that. And it seems that what he says means there won't be any turning back from that. There won't be any going back to a phase without kings. Now with the temptation of Christ, I'll quote from memory north. He doesn't think that that means that the governments are essentially and always from the devil. But because the devil is a liar, he's saying I'll give them to you but it wasn't his to give. He says the governments are still from God. From Samuel's time, God has permitted or allowed that to happen. And as a kind of way of disciplining and punishing people who want the king really and don't want God as their king. But it seems from Samuel's time that he said, okay, like he said that after the flood that's not going to happen again. In the case of Samuel, he says, well, if you want kings, you're going to have kings forever until the end of time. Well, first of all, it's nice to have some kind of confirmation by people you don't know. I would say governments are also a hierarchical, hierarchic structure than, for example, in companies. So here again, I would make, first of all, a big difference again in another context like Doug French said. In the private sector, you have leadership that is incentivized to continue and actually accumulate capital. And the accumulation of capital is a picture for developing, for increasing, for wealth creation and so on. So there is a possibility, obviously, and an ability I would even say in the human being to be able to do that. Now, of course, then on the government side, you have this evil influence by, okay, power corrupts, but we also know big CEOs of big companies are also under the influence of corruption. Now, that is why we have the next evil step is, of course, the collaboration between big companies and big governments. You see, that is not by coincidence. It's a kind of a logic behind it because they are both corrupted and impressed by their big power. So there you could, we could go into the question, how can we develop as a human being that we are one day not corrupted by power? So that is one, I think, very interesting and also kind of spiritual question, of course. How can you be powerful? I mean, this inner or outer authority question. And the second element that is particularly dangerous for government is this damn monopoly situation, which is not true for most of the companies. So there, the big CEOs are a bit in a better situation. So from a spiritual point of view, I would say, my dear, if in this room are people working for the government and not being corrupted by that power, I'm really full of respect for that person. Tim, I don't know. So we have two corruptive powers, power and monopoly situation. And so that's why my criticism is never personally. I would never recommend my son, even if, I mean, if he asks me, hey dad, I'm considering a criminal career. And I would ask public or private sector. I would actually recommend him the private sector. Because there is a bit less of corruption in that career. I would like to ask a question to Sean. You talked about the outsourcing of, the problems with outsourcing of national defence. And to use a more contemporary example, since the Second World War, basically the entire NATO architecture was outsourcing naval power, for example. To the Americans. And perhaps we're seeing now a misalignment between some of the NATO members' own national interests with the American national interests, or whoever holds the power of levers in America. So what do you see happening when, in modern day terms, when a country's leadership, who's part of an alliance, who effectively outsources national defence to another country, feels that all their own national interests is no longer aligned, how would they correct it? Especially if they are a small state, say, Hungary, or they could be a bigger state like Germany. That's the first question. The second question is to Daniel about the psyche of governmental actions. Could there be a silver lining in the entire COVID pandemic whereby all the institutions hijacked by the government, say the media or the so-called medical expert class, the public health expert class, they now have destroyed the credibility so that the people would be less susceptible to have their psyche changed by the government, or at least non-coercive government actions? If the government of Costa Rica outsources its naval defence to the United States, it can probably rely on the Americans to provide such naval defence as may be required because any hostile power which will try to take over Costa Rica will be a threat to the United States. But the wider problem with NATO has existed since its very beginning. The Americans placed the whole of Western Europe under its so-called nuclear umbrella, but everybody knew perfectly well that if the Russians, if the Soviets rather, were to invade, shall we say, West Germany and then to proceed any further into Western Europe, would the Americans seriously consider a nuclear wipeout of the continental United States in order to protect Germany or Western Europe from being invaded? And the answer was, well, we never had to find out the answer to that question, but the answer would probably have been that the Americans would negotiate. And so if you outsource your defence to another power, you need to ask yourself, what is the likely interest of that power if we ever need to call on that guarantee, or if the other power does provide that defence in certain circumstances, what is the particular agenda of that other country? It's a universal problem, and as I said to Tim, if we live in an anarcho-capitalist society and you outsource your defence to a private company, well, for most purposes, that company will have an interest in a competitive market to provide the contracted defence. But there is no necessary alignment between your interests and the interests of your defender. And this is something we see everywhere. We see it in trusteeship arrangements for children. We see it, you see it in almost every situation where one person or one institution is given or undertakes an obligation to defend somebody else. Indeed, that's the whole foundation of trust law as far as I can tell. So the problem faced by the Byzantine state in the 11th and 12th centuries is by no means unique. It's just that the, as I said, the Byzantine ruling class preferred to risk giving its naval defence to the Republic of Venice rather than undertake the very unwelcome task of rebuilding its own naval power because that would raise an internal interest which might be hostile to the actions of the central government. It's just something that happens. Yeah, I will not comment on this. Yeah, certainly, I mean, if the question was if they have lost credibility by these measures, the governments, they definitely did. And so one example is in Germany, we have this famous health minister who is really insisting on COVID and on wearing masks and all that. And he was about, I think he already did, buy millions of vaccine doses. And I think it's an easy forecast that they will not be used and at the end of the day will be thrown away if not sent to somewhere else after expiry. So yes, credibility is lost and in a way that is also good news, you could say. Well, if I was a government consultant, yeah, funny, I would recommend to go into learning and regain credibility because that is basically what you normally do when you lost credibility. But I think as I think in my model, I mentioned monopoly tend to create their own illusions or own, how do you call that? Disablasen, yeah. Bubbles, yeah, exactly. They live in their own bubbles and I see the psychological element of it as well. I mentioned to you, I think, in the lunchtime because she is customer of mine. And I also am in the danger of living in a bubble because as a CEO you have a very biased information stream and you actually have to create your own methods to not live in the bubble.   Now, I start usually my meetings with that statement. They stopped laughing about it because the joke has wearing out a bit but they know that at least that I am aware. So I try to create almost desperately a culture or an atmosphere of bring the problems on the table.  And that's of course a different story in governmental positions. There you have other interests. And that's why I mean basically I would consult these governments to let go their monopoly situations and to create an atmosphere where the facts and figures come on the table. Now, concerning COVID we all know that the cheating of the figures and facts is amazing. I mean that's new record highs and there is an unbelievable fight for these facts and to get it. So almost everybody now knows that the figures are either not correct or have to be second proved or so on. So I would say we are learning a bit even. Even in the bad news this loss of credibility has increased the debate and now the legal working out of all this. I mean it was a criminal act against civilization. Now, how do you work on this?  So for me a very decisive question now in the observation of what's going on is how is this legally digested? That's a key question. If it's okay and there are responsibilities and so on and consequences my forecasts of three to five years tumbling down of institutions I would have to prolong. But I'm afraid I don't think I have to. Sean you promised that you would say something about the parallels with Trump and you didn't deliver on the promise yet. I didn't deliver. No one historical event is a perfect analogy of another. And you could try to compare the Venetians with multinational corporations which seemed a good idea in the early age of globalization and you could try aligning the various actors in Byzantine history with the various actors in our own time. I suppose the best alignment would be between President Trump and Andronicus. And here it's rather depressing. Donald Trump failed because he never understood the nature of political power. He surrounded himself with completely worthless and indeed hostile servants who did their very best to frustrate his wishes. He seems to have believed that simply winning the election in 2016 was the revolution where it was simply a green light from the people to begin a revolution at the top. He did not shut down all of the hostile institutions. He did not put his own people in charge of the remaining institutions. He did none of the institutional trench warfare that would be needed to keep his promise of draining the swamp. On the other hand the emperor Andronicus was ruthless. He did purge the institutions. He tried to clamp down on corruption within the bureaucracy. He tried to reduce the size of the bureaucracy. He tried to stop the nobles from appropriating the land of the peasants. He took a very hard line with what you could call the multinational corporations of the day. He oversaw a massacre of about 60,000 Italian merchants in Constantinople. And still he failed as well. And so I suppose the overall lesson could be that when a civilization sets itself on a crash landing there's not much you can do to change course after a certain point. It may be a rather depressing conclusion. A bit obliquely to that but related. I was struck by what Andreas Turgel told us about Machiavelli in that regard because it tied up with what Sean had said. Machiavelli, if I understood you right, he said the leader of the prince should give the people arms because that would endear the prince to the people. So basically that describes a populist, doesn't it? And it is what Andronicus did. So he made himself popular. I was surprised by that because for me Machiavelli was always the baddie. And here he gives some interesting advice that would weaken the bureaucracy and the other institutions of the state. Just as an oblique point to that. Something I didn't mention earlier was that Andronicus also oversaw a realignment of Byzantine foreign policy. Part of the diagnosis of Andronicus was that the Byzantine state had aligned itself unwittingly to what was turning out to be a vastly more powerful civilization. And that if the Westerners wanted something they would always be able to get it. And Byzantine society at the top was entirely permeated by Westerners. Quite often princesses from the Crusader states or sometimes in case of Andronicus himself. He was married to the very young 12 year old daughter of the King of France. And part of the Andronicus revolution was to realign the pattern of Byzantine alliances away from the West which was too large and too powerful to be trusted and controlled. And towards his Islamic neighbors he sought a much better modus vivendi with the Turks for example. And he saw his own empire as part of a general Near Eastern civilization in which Byzantine Greeks had far more in common with their Islamic neighbors than they had with their co-religionists from the West. And he seems to have started a trend in Byzantine thinking that would end with the statement better the sultans' turban in Constantinople than the Cardinals had. The Greeks seem to have made their decision in that respect.


voltage less than five. First of all a little bit of review again I think I've said to you you're gonna find in a lot of the diagrams the micro Coulomb symbol is kind of overlapping but we have it here as well. It says we have a two micro positive two micro Coulomb charge or 75 centimeters east of it it asks what's the electric field there okay. Electric field from a point charge is k q over r squared that's right from your formula sheet. So the electric field is going to be nine times ten to the ninth q oh two micro Coulomb's two times ten to the negative six all over point seven five squared of the glory. What do you get? Remember we said electric fields are usually in the thousands or tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands so what do you get? 32,000 units. Units less talking more learning units. Now if you can't remember the units for electric field look at your formula sheet seriously. Find the equation for electric field there's two of them. There's two of them that have the e. Find the smaller cleaner tidier one. What is it? Oh what are the units? Look at the look at what the units have to be. Aaron what? It's got not Newton Coulomb's because that means times it's Newton's per isn't it over Coulomb's right? Newton's per Coulomb. In other words the units are there and just got the units are there. The electric field is Newton's per Coulomb. You guys see where I said that where I pointed you there? Okay. Oh direction how do I figure out the direction of the electric field? I ask which way would a positive charge want to move if it could? Which way would a positive charge want to move if it could? It's not meant to be a hard question. Look at this charge imagine a positive sitting right there. Which way would a positive want to move if it could? Northeast, south or west? I would write I'm good with but did they say east in the question as part of the instructions? Then I'll use east west notate. If they say right left I use right left. They say east west I use east west. I'll use east. I wouldn't take marks off. I don't think they went on the provincial but I'm not sure. I've only marked the physics provincial a couple of times and I didn't actually mark an electrostatics one. I don't know how they what their criteria is. B. C. Skip. We're going to do D. The reason I skipped B and C is it's one Coulomb and one Millie Coulomb. The ones don't change anything and I'm worried that when you're studying later on you might think oh it's the same answer. No no it's just because there happened to be a charge of one so I want to get a different answer. Here's what it says for part C. I'm sorry for part D. Charles what's it asking me to find? Now put your pens down. I could do this. I could. Don't write that down. I could do this because I put a second charge right there that's Q2 and I could say oh there's my distance except. Do I know the electric field here already? Yeah it's 32,000 Newtons for Coulomb east. So I have another equation on my formula sheet that has force and electric field in it. Both. What? And if you're hint if you're wondering it's also why I asked you to find that equation for the units. It's the same equation. What equation Aaron? And this is force at that location over charge at that location equals electric field at that location. So if I wanted to find the force, write this down by the way, take your pens. If I wanted to find the force how would I get the F by itself? Cody. As it turns out we could use Coulomb's law but we can just go like this. E Q which is 32,000 times oh this is not micro Coulomb's this is Millie Coulomb's. Millie was I think 10 to the negative 3 on your formula sheet is that right? Yep. Two Millie Coulomb's. I think I do this in my head. 2 times 32 is 64. Is it 64 Newtons even? Someone don't check me. And it's force so Newtons. Direction. If I put a positive right there which way is it going to want to move? And it is a positive they gave me so which way is it going to want to move? East. Now if this shortcut makes you uncomfortable Leslie what is oh I should put a vector there technically what is the equation for electric field? Well if you look up for a second it is KQ over R squared if in my mind I put that there don't actually have KQ Q over R squared I have the force equation in disguise it is the force equation in disguise. If you plug that in for E you'll get Coulomb's law formula number one in your sheet. But if you know the electric field and you know the charge at the same location then you know the force at the same location a little shorter. The electric field tells us the Newtons of force per Coulomb at that location. For energy there's a similar concept an analogous concept that tells us the jewels of energy per Coulomb at that location. So electric field is how many Newtons of force any Coulomb at that location experiences? Voltage tells us how many jewels of energy any Coulomb at that location has. We call it voltage. Well actually we don't. It's commonly called potential. I prefer the term voltage because listen closely to the English here. The potential tells you how much potential energy you have per Coulomb. Did you hear me say potential twice? Those are two totally different concepts. Potential energy is jewels potential is volts they're totally different they're related but they're totally different and I think it's confusing terminology unfortunately it's the standard they're going to call it potential. I'm going to say voltage also because you know what symbol we use for potential? V for voltage which makes it easier to remember. So the units of potential or voltage are jewels per Coulomb but as it turns out one jewel per Coulomb is the definition of one volt. We must be careful not to confuse potential with potential energy. This is where I'm sorry keep your formula sheets out keep looking at them memorize what goes where keep stuff straight because Matt watch. This is the force between two charged objects. This is the electric field between two charged objects. Do they look fairly alike? This is the potential energy between two charged objects. Oh except they don't use PE they use do they look do they look do they look fairly alike? This is going to be the voltage between two charged objects. Do they look do they look do they look do they look fairly alike? Oh it gets better. This is potential energy this is potential not energy but potential how do you keep them straight keep up with the homework I'm erasing this we're going to do this later on in our notes and I just realized I kind of went halfway over the page it won't print properly but this is where we're going to have to really keep things straight. Here is the definition of voltage so voltage is defined as how much energy per charge jewels per Coulomb. Example two says fill in the proof to find the potential or voltage due to a point charge q so if we have to move a test charge q to the field point and then find the ratio of energy per charge potential energy we said yesterday was k big q little q over r not r squared mr duic that's force over r where big q is the planetary fixed charge and little q is the moving satellite charge if I want to find the full voltage it's this divided by q because it's energy per Coulomb it's this energy per Coulomb who's in my math twelves I would never write it like this Kelvin I would write away want whatever one fraction any fractions and then I would say to myself self how do I divide by a fraction this simplifies to k q q over r times 1 over q what do you notice the little q's cancelled the little planetary moving charge cancels sorry not the planetary little satellite moving charge cancelled sorry folks I can't kick this card and I'm not going anywhere warm for spring break rest and this is where we get the voltage near a point charge equation okay big planet over r if you're in orbit around a planetary charge that's your voltage that's how much energy per Coulomb that's why batteries are measured in volts by the way batteries are measured in both but they're really telling you is how much energy each Coulomb of charge has and using that you can figure out then how much work this battery can do if it's a remote control toy how high it can lift the toy or if it's a calculator or an iPod how long because there's also a function of time in there how long it can last before dying and again the bad news is when you look at your formula sheet the first equation the second equation the first one on the third row the first one on the fourth row look at all look a lot of light well keep them straight let's try some example three says find the potential or voltage 75 centimeters east of a two micro Coulomb charge in fact example three is the same as the first example that we did erin except instead of electric field potential and then instead of force potential energy so let's find the potential the voltage is going to be k q over r i believe that's the correct equation yes which is going to be nine times 10 to the ninth two times 10 to the negative six all over 0.75 if you're lucky you might have this in your calculator but with a squared in it you might be able to just go second function enter backspace and delete the square what do you get by the way most voltages in the thousands hundreds of thousands sometimes 24000 volts once again we're going to skip b we're going to skip c and we're going to go to d and once again i'm going to say that you put your bets down now d we magically put a two micro Coulomb charge there and it says find the potential energy lastly i could do this that is uh from your formula sheet that is potential energy but do i know the voltage right here you see we defined voltage as energy per Coulomb for charge get the potential energy by itself the potential energy at that location is going to be the size of the charge at that location times the voltage at that location it's going to be two times 10 to the negative three times 24000 units it's voltage you know what a measure voltage in yeah named after scientists whose last name was no volta italian he built one of the first chemical batteries he was one of the first ones to say oh if i put different types of metals together with some i think he used uh some kind of acid clock clocks sorry what's the answer or 48 sorry and i you know what kim units what did we find not voltage what did we find no we didn't find potential because potential is the same as voltage this is why they pick bad names i know it's not potential it's potential what which is measured in no what's energy measured in joules do you see why like by the way kim the math we've done so far up to lesson five i don't even think we barely cross multiply but do you see the potential for confusion do your preaching to the choir never mind oh no i'm not preaching to the choir do your homework if we know the change in voltage why that sounds like now there is a fancy term for change in voltage what's change in anything final minus initial and you know what a math word for minus is difference so the fancy word that they use for change in voltage is there sometimes say find the potential difference then we can find the work required to move a charge between these two points says find the potential at point x how many charges are there in this picture two so once again less than going to use the principle of superposition if they want me to find the voltage right there i'm going to temporarily ignore that one and just find the voltage from this guy then i'm going to temporarily ignore that one and just find the voltage from this guy oh can we all let's go back to this box here draw a little arrow and write the word scalar because voltage is a scalar and what that means is we're going to put in the signs we're going to put in the negatives and positives it didn't matter so far because all we've had were positive charges but if they give me a negative charge i'll get a negative voltage in fact most often that's what you have when you're dealing with a circuit or a battery it's actually a negative voltage because we can move electrons around way easier than protons so going back to here i'll call this charge oh i don't know a and charge b charge one and charge two charge alpha charge beta i don't care and part a they want me to find the total voltage the voltage right there the total voltage is going to be the voltage of a which is k q a over r a matt what's k yep probably the easiest constant you'll ever come up it's seriously it's one of the only nice ones out there nine times 10 to the ninth q two positives i won't put the plus sign but positive 2.5 i think that's supposed to be micro coulombs again all over what's r this distance here which is oh 0.2 what's the voltage from charge a at location x don't all rush for your calculators at once i think this one if i recall is in the hundreds of thousands i think hundred twelve five hundred it's not my final answer so i won't do sig figs just yet units this time kim yay need after a scientist his last name was no volta now i also want to find the voltage from location b but take a look at location b erin is location b the same charge is location a it is and is the distance the same as distance a in other words i'm going to say you're going to be putting the same number there and the same number there i'm just going to say the total voltage at location x let's make that a v mr do it cannot you the total voltage at location x is two times a hundred and twelve thousand five hundred because both these happen to be identical and greg because voltage is a scalar i don't care about i don't need to know theta i don't care about that's a scalar who cares uh 250 000 volts yes 225 000 volts that's what i said what does b want me to find what does b want me to find the potential another word for voltage well that's going to be nine times 10 to the ninth still 2.5 times 10 to the negative six oh better location why i'm going to use this distance here which is which is what what is this distance here 435 can someone crunch that please my friends i can't hear sorry 64285 anybody else 64286 units volts that's the voltage from a erin does charge b have the same charge as charge a is the distance the same then you know what the voltage from b is going to be identical to the voltage from a so i'm just going to write voltage b equals the same answer the voltage at y then is going to be two times 64286 what do you get you get that 128 500 600 sorry i get 1.29 times 10 to the fifth joules volts did i say joules i wrote volts boy what kind of drugs are you on mr do it oh some good cold ones c justin what does c want me to find that doesn't say voltage is it there's a potential difference change in voltage they want me to find that justin my friend what's changing anything what's my final reading the question what's my final location x or y read the question carefully oh we're ending up starting at y ending up at x so it's going to be right starting at y doesn't say that so there's my initial and my final final minus initial it's going to be 225 000 mixed up 12 let's see 225 000 minus 128 600 boy i'm battling wake up mr good it's not helping my throat at all so whatever i'm working on uh 225 000 minus 96 428 units this is still voltage d here is the whole point if i gave you this i'd probably just give you d and say go to town hannah once you finish yawning can you read d to me please put your pencils down normally up until now we would be going don't write this down hey work equals change in potential plus change in kinetic and uh starting at rest ending at rest and you could go change in potential and you could go change in kinetic we got a better way in moving from here to here it's talent we've just calculated we traveled through 96 400 volts and do you remember how we defined volts we defined volts write this down in just a second not yet as energy per coulomb oh per charge i think that means the change in voltage is going to be the change in energy per coulomb and work is going to be the change in potential plus the change in kinetic can you see a shorter way to write change in potential energy that's change in potential can you see a shorter way to write change in potential energy in other words can you get this by itself no no this is a completely separate equation take this equation here get change in potential energy by itself see this is going to give us a new equation for work as it turns out work is also going to be q v about q change in voltage you want to know how much energy you have to supply to move from y to x all you need to know is how many volts you're traveling through and multiply it by how big the charge is that's how much energy you need in our case how big a charge are we moving what does part d say milli or micro milli how many volts are we moving through nine six four two eight how much work 121 joules this method used in d is a much quicker method given the fact that we have two points that are not at right angles in fact here's the beautiful thing about this this Leslie both energy and work are scalars and that means that if I had chosen to go like this to get to x the answer would still be the same it doesn't care about what happens in between it just cares about before and after or even if I decided to go like this the matter whatever I lost I'd gain back and eventually I'd end up with the same total so next page if the charge is beginning end at rest carly the work will just be the change in potential energy which is the charge times the change in voltage work is going to be that sorry I won't introduce the wings yet that comes later later on we're going to have an equation with two v's in it one capital one lowercase and because my capital v's look an awful lot like my lowercase these because I don't have lined paper I add little wings to my capital v to make it work better so it says prove that if the charge q begins and ends at rest then this equation is true well we said this work is equal to change in potential plus change in kinetic except sophie if you start and end at rest that's zero what's changing anything I'm not going to use that instead what I'm going to say is and I also know this the change in voltage is equal to the change in energy for coulomb that's on your formula sheet I believe is it not I think second row or third row second row which means if I get this by itself Aaron how would I get the p e by itself multiplied by q work equals oh and if you're not beginning at ending at rest you would just drop the change in kinetic down and you can go final minus initial let's summarize we can find voltage by using the definition voltage is energy per coulomb or we can use the point charge equation voltage is k q over r and we can find energy in two ways we can find potential energy by going k q1 q2 over r if we know both charges and how far they are apart we can also find energy by saying the energy at any location is going to be the charge at that location times the voltage at that location a little note a little reminder potential energy and potential are not vectors and they have no let's try that again potential energy and potential are not vectors so they have no direction that means that we're going to include the sign positive the negatives but the other nice thing is that means if we have several charges contributing potential energy or voltage we just add them all up we don't care if they're not a nice street line we don't add them vectorially we don't worry about going winter minus add them up homework what did i assign this morning well i gave out one two missed one no one two four five seven nine one two four five seven nine one two four seven or was soapy saying no no nine i mean yes number nine


What's going on everyone Sam here with late in sports cards, and I am ripping 2022 tops tier one baseball hobby 12 box case Number 56 pick your team style. I have the teams right in front of me gonna read them off really quick Got Kurt S. Padres Christy nationals Dean E. Blue Jays Joey G Dodger Stuart Z Braves Alexandros S with the Red Sox Royals Pirates Rays Kevin D. Oriol Scott F. Mariners tie W with the Cubs Kyle H. Phillies Keith J. White Sox Matthew G. Cardinals John W. Tiger. Yeah, Tigers Adam M. Astros Why are these not in order? All right. Anyway, whatever Tony K. Twins Danny C. Angels Philip M. Giants Joshua B Guardians Rockies Brewers Suzanne P. Marlins Rangers John A. Metz Rusty Yankees Brandon G. Athletics Jared B. Reds and Joshua M. Diamondbacks. So good luck everyone Let's rip some tier one.  We saw some saw a bat barrel Couple of big autos nice patches and everything so hopefully we can empty case Here we go. Hopefully we can kind of redo that tonight at least with some of the brakes here pack one You've got JT Real Muto book and 399 of 399 Phillies the patch Got brewers auto 91 of 255 Freddy Peralta real brew crew and For the A's tier one talent 67 out of 75 mark McWire Nice hit their A's Sweet McWire Box to 12 of 25 three-color two-color patch Aaron judge nice hit their Yanks. That's sick on the judge Got rookie auto Royals 18 of 299 Jackson co-ar and And last hit a box to 94 out of 125 Tim Reigns go into the expo's nice Hall of Fame hit That'll go nationals got the expo's love right there expo's hat hitting an expo Thanks for the follow there Wanda. All right box three. Here we go guys Come on, baby. Let's see something big See something big Joe Morgan 146 out of 199 reds on the legend bat relic grads reds Got 147 of 299 that is Patrick Corbin going to the Nats Here you go nationals and going again to the Yankees 56 out of 75 Anthony Rizzo nice Riz Grats again Yanks that is sick on the Anthony Rizzo Love having him him on the squad So good by Crystal Palace and Liverpool are gonna buy Got relic 169 out of 249 for the angels Brandon Marsh now a Philly again that will obviously go angels Got bronze ink 13 out of 25 rookie auto Ernie Clement Cleveland Guardians nice hit their guardians and For the Red Sox 57 out of 125 Jason Veratek Nice one there on one of the Red Sox legends Jason Veratek actual legend not ironic legend Got going back to the Yankees 124 out of 399 Gary Sanchez On the pinstripe patch nice one there Got mariners 142 out of 199 Kyle Lewis Okay Lou action and Nice three out of 50 for the Orioles Eddie Murray on the tier one blue autocraft Congrats Orioles Call of Fame hit right there 3,000 hit club. I think You know that are 500 homeruns. I forget Yeah Cuts Brian de la Cruz for the Marlins one out of 399 Book and there that really got Luis Urias to 14 out of 399 brewers patch or Jersey got Nick Madrigal 180 out of 199 There you go cubbies nice one here Redemption breakout autograph Bobby with junior boom Congrats Alexandros with the Royals Nice hit there One of the first times we're seeing Bobby Whit come out of this that is sick That is gonna be so nasty when it comes in Congrats again, Alexandra's Wow All right, let's keep going tier one case What else you got in the store for us?  We've got seven out of a hundred tier one talent auto Joey Vado There you go Reds Nice Reds hit here one here. We go Miss 185 out of 249 for the White Sox Little bit of a patch there too on the side you can see some stitching Got tier one talent Steve Garvey Steve Garvey Congrats Angels. Who's got this team man? This is a sick case so far Where are they cool man?  You got a Chris Thanks for picking up the Nationals. I know they're one of the last teams sticking around Just mark mark coming in trolling me because that's not a big card at all With the little tongue out emoji Alex Braggman. That is 341 out of 399 Astros Stroze Get a couple fillers put that behind it That's what I did.  Oh, yeah, this is tier one. That's why it's all about why you jump into your one man That's just like the hit possibility out of it crazy absolutely wild Got 283 out of 399 Anthony Rizzo going to the Yankees Yankees picking up a lot of hits in this one, which is nice Got y'all yo help hoso for the Rangers rookie auto 108 out of 299. I'm sick one here, too Also going to the Rangers. How about Jersey auto 26 out of 49 Adrian Beltray? Nice hit there Rangers. You got the Rangers That's Suzanne P nice one there on the future first ballot all the famer sick Bell Tray He's the man. I love the Asian Beltray Yeah, he was like impossible to dislike, you know Yeah, I saw that mark. I was surprised they fired not really I guess I wouldn't say surprised but Wasn't necessarily expecting it right now Got guardians Ernie Clement that is 203 out of 399 Jersey Got a Dolis Garcia 39 out of 299 Rangers again Rangers doing well nice a Dolis and Jared Walsh angels 82 out of 99 going on a Jersey auto Nice one angels Rats there two spots to go on tier 157 breaks right after this and there's gonna be fire They're all different cases too. So the hits are just the hits just keep on coming It really is the jelly of the month Couldn't agree more on that statement Got Lance McCullers, Jr. 180 out of 399 Astros relic Got Derek Lee going to the Marlins. Nice one there 12 out of 399. Love those Marlins Got rookie auto Red Soxed 135 out of 299 Conor Wong and End off the break 144 of 175 tier one talent auto Dale Murphy. There you go Braves congrats on the Dale Murphy One second here guys. We'll do a quick recap And this is all hit. So recap will just be every hit start with the Relics really quick. Thank you Sean We've got Derek Lee to 399 Marlins Lance McCullers, Jr. to 399 Astros Ernie Clemente to 399 Guardians Anthony Rizzo to 399 Yankees Alex Pregnant 399 that is Astros Frank Thomas the 249 White Sox Tori Hunter to 399 angels Wilson Chairs to 299 Cubs Brian De La Cruz to 399 Marlins Luis Irias to 399 Brewers Gary Sanchez to 399 Yanks Brandon March to 249 Angels Joe Morgan to 199 Reds Aaron Judge to 25 Yanks sick patch on that JT Real Muto 399 of 399 Phillies bookend Go on to our autos next Got Dale Murphy to 175 Braves tier one talent Connor Wong to 299 rookie auto Red Sox Jared Walsh patch auto 99 Angels Adola's Garcia to 299 Rangers Agent Beltray to 49 Ranger sick one there Gratigan Rangers Yo Helpozo rookie auto 299 Rangers Randy Rosarena 299 Rays Kyle Muller to 25 bronze ink auto Braves Got Steve Garvey to 299 Dodgers Joey Votto to 100 tier one talent Reds Curtis Terry to 299 Rangers Nick Madrigal to 199 Cubs Eddie Murray to 50 Orioles nice legend there Kyle Lewis to 199 Mariners Jason Baratac to 125 Red Sox Ernie Clemente bronze ink auto 25 Guardians Anthony Rizzo to 75 Yankees Patrick Corbin to 299 Nationals Tim Reigns to 125 Expos that'll go Nationals Jackson Kaur rookie auto 299. That's Royals Mark McGuire to 75 tier one talent ease Freddie Feralta to 255 Brewers and our mag cars First up. We had Bobby Whit jr. On the breakout auto redemption. Congrats again, Alexandra's that's sweet and Hitted the break for sure going to Chris D with the Nationals one Soto bat auto three out of five Nasty nasty nasty card right there Wow That'll do it for the break there. Congrats again everyone on the hits next up more tier one


The ruxin mystery packs are back What's up guys? We're back with another mystery pack opening We have more ruxin mega mystery pack 2.0's and there's some slight changes to the second wave of mega pack 2.0 But before we actually talk about it, we have a giveaway. I'll be giving away every card we pull in this video We're opening three ruxin mystery packs with an example from both the red silver and purple version So we're gonna get to see all those the gold contains a bonus card It's one in a hundred so we're not gonna show that because we don't need to pull the bonus card We need you guys to pull the bonus card. So these will be available right now I'll have the link down below to the affiliate link go check out sassy out. Oh, he'll be the one shipping them out They did all like the packaging and everything like that And there's been a few changes that we'll talk about as we go through the packs But I wanted to show you guys just an example of what you can get so the first one we have This is an example of a purple pack so inside you can get you get six modern era packs And then you get one of the bonuses so These are some examples the packaging I will say we're changing up the packaging for 3.0 But cyber is no longer in here because we're just like that wasn't that good. It was in the wrong spot is purple Don't really want cyber anyway. No code of the duelist We took those out because they're not great So we left all the good stuff in took out the worst stuff. We also added some 25th anniversary I don't know if they're in every pack, but they'll be scattered throughout so 25th anniversary will be super fun I know you guys wanted to see that in the next packs. So there you go. So let's just go to it There's a few other things I think that like rarity collection has potential in here But because it's such a new pack and we'd already made these packages. They're only bonus packs So first of all we have our purple pack. Okay, we'll throw that to the back. That can be one of mini packs Let's see what we get in terms of our packs inside So don't forget if you do want to get some of these check out the link down below You can grab some there's a limited amount once they sell out 2.0 is done forever We'll be going to 3.0 at some point next year probably several months A lot of you guys have been asking for for mystery packs So they're back for a little bit if you like them buy them if you don't like them You're not a mystery pack guy. Don't buy them I do not encourage you to buy these unless you're a mystery pack person and you expect to potentially lose money Probably most of the time we do our best to have some good value in the packs that you pull But this is what it's a mystery pack most of the time. You're not gonna make your money back Okay, so we have a we're just gonna go one at a time actually I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna do this So, okay, we got a little spoiler back there, but we're gonna do 2022 10 of the Pharaoh gods first Let's see if we can get that pot of prosperity even though it did get seven reprints recently Let's see if we can pull something arm dragon thunder. We have myos click We have a link apple. We have sacred tree beasts. Remember. This is the giveaway So all these cards can be yours and speaking of go check the community tab There's a lot of winners have been announced so go check that out. See if you want anything ghost border We have flounder ease we have scrap raptor ultra rare sprites blessing Underworld goddess the closed world. Okay, not bad. And then we got some more comments So, okay start not anything crazy 2022 was way better before rarity collection because it had pot of prosperity Now it's probably a lot like less valuable. Thanks to the reprints. Okay, our next pack I'm gonna keep these behind my face cam so you can't be spoiled legend of blue eyes 25th anniversary I think he said that there is one per pack at least a 25 not necessarily LOB though Also the 100 card chase I forgot to mention the big car that you're searching for is an ultimate rare cyber dragon Which funnily enough was one we pulled on the channel in a box break and supposedly according to sassy auto That guy who pulled it sold it to him and now it's in the mystery pack So you could potentially win a pack pulled ultra rare cyber dragon, so I was surprised the guy didn't grade it I don't remember if it was off-center or something So who knows maybe it's a PSA 10 gradeable one You'll have to go back and see the cyber dragons we pulled if it is or not legend of blue eyes white dragon So that's the goal. That's one in a hundred So unlikely you get it But if you do you're hitting big because these these packs cost like one 20th of the cost of that card So yeah, if you hit that you're doing really well, and then you have all your packs as well We have firegrass we have dragon treasure what I shield dragon dissolve rock sparks Beast banks tie on dragon capture jar and So again, okay, nothing there. That's okay. It's okay. Next we got legendary duelist first edition I will I will add that's not bad Magical hero because this magical hero is actually a good legendary duelist It has had a lot of reprints on the set But there are still like 20 ish dollar cards in here that you can get timegazer magician and obviously magician souls is a great one Number F zero doppel warrior. Let's see if we can get something On amount of pickup. Okay, nothing in that one. That's one of the better legendary duelist But nowadays legendary duelist has been pretty bad recently. Okay, we have a photon hypernova first edition Let's see if we can get a star light rare photo on hypernova was pretty good at time of release I don't remember I'm guessing a lot of these cards haven't been reprinted just yet So it's probably still pretty solid giski necromir because it's earlier this year They usually wait till like next year or something or at least it was an early set So maybe some of them Let's see if I recognize cash tira. I feel like they haven't really reprinted those yet plunder patrol ship jord Okay, so yeah unlucky on that one. We did not pull anything unfortunately, but we do have a battle's alleged monsters revenge pack So five card pack potential at What's in here again monsters revenge? 25 quarter century rares, right? That's our that's what we can get. We have noa pung seaman We have ultra rare nightmare corruptor e blay pretty good card. That's where it would have been I think lamia and photon vanisher. So okay, we haven't pulled anything huge yet But that's the nature of it. Unfortunately burst of destiny is up next has been hit more hard by reprints But stratus still not pulled one yet star light. That would be epic one two three four No ultra rucks and special we have starry night orbit a Penguin night or penguin ninja. Sorry. I'm just used to penguin night penguin ninja Bangly the why does that look like a pineapple soldier palm? Is that like it? It's like a pineapple I was let's say Pokemon. It's like a pineapple ice Jade going into ship break the destiny heritage of the light flip the frozen and Flundery's a neckline. No no more flundery's please just make it stop please. Okay, so now here's our purple pack This is the guarantee.  So this is the worst one you'll get. Let's see what it will be Previously in the other well, this is the same one So it should be battle's legend arm again in tune chaos is your big chases here. Let's see. Oh Chaos impact. Okay, that's not IP mask arena I was thinking this was a code the duelist for a second. I was like, okay Yeah chaos impact IP mask arena or bust but starlight where IP mask arena I haven't actually checked the price since the 25th came out still probably pretty expensive It used to be a $1,500 starlight. We have a dances of the East Promotier we have desert locus. I have pulled two mask arena before in the same case So let's just pull one for you guys cauldron the old man classic retrain We're in says you call it a retrain. What's a spell? I don't know if you call that what what train speaking up We have glad to be come back and then there's a super. Okay, so no IP mask arena. Unfortunately, but Pretty sweet pack. All right, that first one. We didn't really pull anything crazy But that you know, it's mystery packs. So they are mine. So I you know, I'm part of it We're hoping that you can pull something good But keep in mind it's about the pack value that you're kind of basing in on not the cards You pull because it's so hard you guys have seen my videos So hard to pull good cards out of just any packs in general much less when you're there in mystery packs So here we go. We got to do it the same way. So this is silver So it's we were sent a silver a red and a purple for you guys just so you see the potential But silver are one and five so whenever you five on average keeping mind is an average You will get a silver one every ten on average. You should get a red which has the older packs I'm still so cool seven silver as well. So alright, I'm gonna pull these out I'm not gonna spoil them over here. I don't want you guys to see I want you guys to get them one at a time. So there are some some newer packs included here in the Modern packs. Oh, and I forgot to mention you can get those redemption booster boxes, which never expire by the way You can always redeem one for a new booster box So it won't be like now's new boost booster box will be whenever you redeem it So if in 2027 you try to redeem with sassy, it'll be that current booster box Not to 2023 because you can't just hold it and let it, you know Oh, wow, that box is now worth like a million dollars You can't you can't do that because that would just would be crazy for him and like 2035 and people were trying to redeem these And I want to mention we didn't do the dueling redemptions this time because only like three people redeemed them out of the 25 We sent out people didn't really care about those and we didn't do the uh Guess that price thing because no one ever came forward with that one So it's either sealed still or someone didn't want to do it and they didn't mention it So I figured why would we do those again? Nobody really cared about it first pack in the silver pack 25th anniversary 10 dueling heroes These were what what could we get out of here? These were kind of average 25th anniversary Uh cucumber horse. That's a big one now. There we go breath and resurrection. We have scareclaw splash We have mary melphys gib brine. We have no ru Drugonic pendulum Zalamander catalyzer blue eyes tyrant dragon Blazing artesia the virtuous so you get to yeah, you get to Uh, the prismatic secrets.  There's a drako back So that's an okay pack, you know, it's mega packs You get a lot of cards, which is nice and it does look like you're gonna get a metal raiders pack or a 25th anniversary pack Metal raiders here, but 25th anniversary pack. That's because so far we're two for two So this is fun. Everybody likes getting old school packs, you know 25th anniversary Everybody loved opening that stuff up reoccution power. Let's see if we can pull a gate guardian jellyfish lego Genzo number seven mystic lamp blue wing crown empress judge mylas radiant and Bottom to other man. We're getting kind of waxed right now. This is pretty rough. Next up. We have synchro storm So this is definitely the worst pack we've seen so far in the mystery packs Synchro storm does have a ghost or potential does have baron, but with the seven reprints I'm guessing the ultra baron is pretty cheap now Unfortunately because this used to be a $100 card that took a lot of this pack So just that card made it worth it. We have lyralisk. We have speed roid. Let's see if we can get it Anyway, they'll be cool start us assault speed roid and Totem, so yeah, you much rather Have the magical hero probably you can't get a ghost there. So it depends on if you want to pull the ghost or not Oh, look at this you guys speaking of ghosts, you know what we've been searching for for quite a while in the last couple months Question of the past. Let's see if we can do it. Here we go Let if this had the if this actually had it we crazy splash magician metapoles silver We have sunseed shadow drug unity draft And starry night. Okay, they continue to not give us what we're looking for two packs left. We have crystal revenge That's pretty fun. Exodia starlight potential the limbs have not had a reprint So those are actually probably going to be decent, you know, but the exodia had having the 25th anniversary But nothing for the the limbs. This has 25th anniversary. No, it doesn't okay hero call This is right before 25th anniversary hot springs fried for patchwork emblem and Okay, advanced crystal beast emerald tortoise the advanced crystal beasts in here I remember them now. We opened how many cases of that set like 10 It's like an eight hour stream which at the time was really long But in the last month we've done two longer than that one almost nine hours one almost 10 hours Yeah, it's getting crazy one more pack in here. We haven't had a good pull yet It's been rough dark wing boss first edition. Keep in mind. This is probably good This is probably good. You're watching this so you know that this is something that can happen when opening mystery packs They're all you know random packs from booster boxes at sassiata opened up So it's not like, you know, they've pulled the good cards already or anything, but they're still random So when random is random, you know, you get six or seven foils of box 17 of them get nothing So you could get a bunch of those put together So before you buy keep that in mind that that could happen We have terrible mode stream soul scissors internal queen salmon turbo tainan We have naturia camellia decisive battle of goganda Amazonas Augusta laughing puffin. What is this? Oh dark wing blast sells a lot of good cards I still have a lot of dark wing blast packs haven't opened and Branded beast. Okay branded beast Okay, maybe this silver pack and make up for it. This is like what 20 20 10 error to 2015 Let's see what we get we can get something cool Something older. Well, it's gotta be older guaranteed 2010 to 2015. Let's see What it will be. I'm guessing like dimension of chaos we could get A photon shock wave something like that. Oh photon shock way. Oh you get to Oh Okay, he was saying that sometimes you get a rarity collection bonus and I don't think it has to be silver So I guess this this one just had a rarity collection bonus pack. That's pretty cool All right, so not only do we get photon shock wave first edition with potential for the galaxy as photon dragon ghost rare We also got a rarity collection pack. So that's pretty cool. Okay. Cool. Cool. Cool So that's a new addition versus the first wave All right, that'll be interesting when people have these if you give them seals Like if it's first wave second wave, you won't be able to tell from the packaging Here we go baron. So we got the baron after all. That's cool. Okay. We have a ghost trick angel of mischief Can we get a ulti or a collector rare called by the grave? Come on Okay, good cards, but even out of here we can't pull a high rarity still really solid cards They're lightning storm evenly match. I mean really good stuff photon shock wave It'll still be a good giveaway for you guys because there's good cards Though they're not super expensive first edition photon shock wave I'm hoping we can pull something big for you guys if we get a ghost share first ed I'm gonna freak out one two I'm gonna do three to be safe. It's probably four but I'm gonna do three a traffic control poisonous winds Road nuts. Oh a classic. We got the road nut ego boost zen malfunction male function walk over heartfelt appeal Baby tera gone. Well, that is the rare. So it was four from the back. Okay. Oh, man. I was like is that a rare? I couldn't tell at first. Okay, the red pack is going to be good guys final mystery pack This one is guaranteed to be red. It's normally one in 10 But we're doing this just so you guys can see what a red pack will consist of So if you if you see that pop out you get excited because that's a 2002 to 2009 era So you're talking like 5d stuff or talking Barrow servant potential I think is what we had in there cybernetics revolution stuff like that And if you see gold freak out you might get that cyber dragon those other cards as well So it's not guaranteed cyber dragon. All right. We're starting off with a 2021 10 of ancient battles 2021 10 Not the best pack ever, you know, and there's not a lot of great stuff in here But that's just what happens with the mega 10 packs like they have a lot of cards And they're super good and then everything gets reprinted. So it's kind of tough on those jabbing panda Still a few good cards you could pull out of here. I think uh, is savage in here Prismatic secret and then I think uh, oh there's a couple. What's the other one? Traveller volt, that's a secret. So you only get one in here though You only get the one prismatic secret gravedure's trapeze a good card So not like not like bad cards. Just not super value right there rose girl guy the magical knight Okay, next we get a dark crisis. So it's looking like you're going to get 25th anniversary Let's see what you're going to get you get a zolga We're uh, oh, I didn't do a pack trick. Let's do three So we get that exodian necrosis at the end We've had good luck with it recently iron blacksmith kotetsu and kandesine ordeal ultra for tribute We're out of the mind's eye. We have growl twin swords of flashing light if you're from the dark and It's the final countdown Of the mystery pack and we are not pulling much next is Soulburn soul burning volcano not the best. I mean, yeah, so in this uh, The legendary duelist slot is definitely the crappiest slot of these mystery packs, which they're my mystery packs But I'm just gonna say it like soul burning volcano not a good set, you know Volcanic we have battle boxer. Oh rucksus patch. Hey, that's actually pretty good The thing about soul burning volcano is it's kind of a boring set But not a lot of people open it. So some of the ultras are actually like a few blocks So I think this is actually a pretty good poll that might actually be our best poll yet So What can I say? I mean it's not a good set but people to good card So who cares we'll take it goes from the past too. So it looks like the kind of the orders you get a mega pack You get a legendary duel you get a 25th anniversary like legacy pack you get legendary duelist You get a ghost from the past one or two pack and then a couple of randoms I mean there are there's different options But that seems like kind of the order which is kind of kind of nice kind nice and consistent You're gonna get kind of know what you're getting with flint craggler. We have a rookie warrior reps you egg We have hella and Oh, I think I need to do a pack trick on that. It would have been the reptia egg I think okay. Yeah, because it goes from the past too. All right Our best poll is that a soul burning volcano. Oh out of my mystery packs, too This is this how did this happen cyber storm access? I think that the angel is pretty big in here, right the chaos angel That's still a good card. Yeah, this one's recent enough that there's still some big cards in it We have the dream defender We have dual avatar new frontier dream defender again double hooking virtual world tiger etude of the branded Sinet circuit And minadium of station. We are just the good side is if I'm not pulling anything now That means the other mystery packs. Hopefully are better, you know, because we got all the dud packs one more pack amazing defenders Which was terrible at the beginning got a lot better. I think it's kind of like in the middle of that now Because a lot of that are a lot of archetypes got banned and stuff So I don't I think you do too from the back on this rota Okay, I got scared because I saw the rare we have limited removal rescue I thought it was a collector rescue a fire attacker and overlay regen. Okay. Wow Yeah, rough pulls rough pulls on those three. Keep in mind. That's what can happen when buying mystery packs I don't want you guys to buy.  So yeah, that's a disclaimer mystery packs Keep it in mind before you buy, but if you do want some there will be linked down below with sassiado It's an affiliate link with me. Here we go red pack. I I'm I'm a guest pharaoh servant cybernetic revolution We've done before Lost millennium stuff like that. Let's see what it is. Oh legacy of darkness first edition I've never gotten one of these. Oh, I wonder if it's lily or I don't actually know the IPC for this one lily or Yada either way, it's a great option. Okay. Let's see what we can get. Maybe this is the one we'll pull something Here we go. LOD first edition. Let's go guys. Make sure to enter the giveaway Even if you don't buy a mystery pack, you can enter the giveaway one two three four We have the dragon dwelling in the cave first edition spirit invitation twin-headed wolf We've got the greatest is option spirit Ryu spiritual energy settle machine Super robo lady Is this it? Troop dragon. No, it's not one more card Thunder nyan nyan makes another appearance. Here's the good side. All those other LOD packs that'll be in there They're gonna be even better because we just got a rare So we didn't pull incredible in this video But i'm hoping that that means the other mystery packs will be even better and don't forget if you are interested They are linked in the description below. I appreciate you guys supporting through the mystery packs By purchasing stuff from me through patreon any other way that you guys support I appreciate all of you guys. Thank you guys for watching. Make sure to subscribe if you want to see more Shout out to tomahawk show dax or tomato juice puppets of doom or nester dn at america doyser spremesage 21 cj Liu guine 62 Yu-Gi-Oh unboxed in a thai show in moosey junior barding robert f tomas book lane and changa lang Thank you guys for supporting the channel and i'll see you guys in the next one peace


This video wouldn't have been possible without NordVPN, your personal security guard, and your hack to watch movies not available in your region. You can get a special discount by clicking the link below. Hello, Psych2Goers! Welcome back to our channel. We wanted to take a moment to let you know how grateful we are for all of your support. Your ongoing support is what helps us make psychology and mental health more accessible to everyone. So, thank you. Now, let's continue. You might think that extroverts tend to be more successful than introverts because of their natural affinity for the spotlight. Or often flooded with messages that we need to speak up and stand out in order to be successful. But actually, introverts can achieve even more if they're allowed to hone their natural strengths. So, let's take a look at seven advantages to being an introvert. Number one, you cultivate deep relationships. Do you prefer having a small, close circle of friends? As an introvert, you prioritize quality over quantity when choosing your friends. When deciding who to be a friend, you're selective and take each person into careful consideration. Your relationships with your friends are usually healthy and well nurtured because you cherish them. You prefer having deep, meaningful connections over shallow and casual interactions. As an introvert, you have the advantage of surrounding yourself with a small group of loyal and trustworthy friends. Number two, you are a very good listener. Dear friends always call you when they need to vent or look to you for advice when they have a problem. When you're more introverted, you have the advantage of being a great listener because you process information internally, meaning that you hear, understand, and provide a proper response after careful consideration. You listen to what your friends are saying and don't jump into the conversation to make it about you, making your friends feel heard and respected when they talk to you. They prefer you over someone who will interactively jump into the conversation and interrupt them to talk about themselves. Number three, you are creative and original. Do you prefer having some alone time now and then? Spending time away from distractions and other people makes it so that social trends don't have much sway over your thinking, which allows you to develop your own personal novel insights. One of the most famous examples of this advantage of being creative and original was Albert Einstein. His introverted nature allowed him to develop insights that completely changed the world of physics. Number four, you're very observant. Introverts have keen observation skills to add to their great listening skills. When you're more inclined to stay quiet, you wind up noticing more of what's going on around you. You're able to notice other people's body language and facial expressions, making you a better communicator on an interpersonal level. Additionally, you're more familiar with introverted qualities, so you're able to notice when someone else is being quiet and processing information, thinking or observing the way that you do. Number five, you are able to really focus. When you're introverted, you're more likely to be able to focus more clearly on your tasks and responsibilities. This is a very useful skill to have, especially at school or at work. It will allow you to be more productive in whatever you're doing and excel in it. For example, if you're very interested in researching a specific topic, you can quickly become an expert on that topic, as compared to someone who is researching the same topic as you, but has a split attention span.  As an introvert, have you struggled with the idea of seeing yourself as a leader and shy away from taking on demanding or authoritative roles in your life? You might want to rethink that mindset, because according to Bright, introverts can make some of the best leaders. This is because introverts do not feel the need to be the center of attention when a group succeeds. Instead, they spread the credit and prefer to highlight the strengths of the team as a whole. This can have a great effect on everyone's motivation. Your introverted nature allows you to hold deeper and more personal conversations with your team members, so that you know their strengths, weaknesses, and skills in detail, so you can figure out and decide how the team can best succeed. Then number seven, you're independent. As the introverted nature indicates, you cherish your alone time, since this time is used to recharge and focus on your personal projects. As such, you focus on cultivating a self-sufficient and independent lifestyle. This, along with the ability to really focus, will allow you to be a very productive person without the need of others, making you an invaluable member on any team. On a more personal level, being independent means that you can achieve happiness without the need of others. This is not to say that you cannot be happy if there are other people in your life, but rather that you can still find happiness on your own. Did you relate to any of these points as an introvert? What are some other advantages that you think you personally have? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below. Don't forget to please like and share this video if it helped you, and you think it could help someone else too. The studies and references used are listed in the description below. Don't forget to hit the subscribe button and notification bell icon for more Psych2Go videos. Thanks so much for watching, and we'll see you next time. So, before connecting to the public internet from your local coffee shop, make sure you turn on NordVPN, so that your privacy is protected. NordVPN lets you connect to six devices with just one subscription, so you don't have to feel sketched out when you connect multiple devices to public Wi-Fi from places like McDonald's or Starbucks. Did we mention that with NordVPN you can connect to Romania or the Netherlands to watch all your favorite movies that aren't on your local Netflix? One of our go-to movies is Hachi, A Dog's Tale. Such a tear-jerker. We promise you won't be disappointed. Check out our special offer in the description box below, or simply go to www.nordvpn.com to get a huge discount on your subscription. Seriously, it's 68% off a two-year plan, so you're only paying less than $4 a month. You'll also receive an additional four months free, and a surprise gift. Make sure you use your coupon, Psych2Go, at the checkout. Hurry up, because this deal won't last long.


Yeah, we are at RAF Fairford to demonstrate a very unique capability that we've been working on at RAF Mildenhall over the last several months and even years called Agile Combat Employment. And that capability is to be able to disperse to multiple different locations with multiple aircraft to complicate and confuse our adversaries targeting problem set. We're going to multiple locations and we're actually going to be in total operating out of five different locations, but we're distributing throughout the United Kingdom to several different bases. Many of them more expeditionary than our main operating base at Mildenhall, but we're also going to go into the Baltics and project tanker power into the Baltic region in support of our allies and partners and coalitions in that area. Fairford is a great opportunity for us. It is a little more expeditionary, meaning it doesn't have as much infrastructure as we have at RAF Mildenhall, so this is a great opportunity to take a portion of our force and to move it to a place that we don't normally operate out of. When we do that, it forces us to think through some of the challenges that we have when we're separated from our normal logistics lines, when we're separated from our normal infrastructure and support that we have in our main operating base at RAF Mildenhall. The goals of this exercise are really to demonstrate that we can quickly and effectively disperse our force, meaning our tanker aircraft across multiple different locations and not just disperse, but also operate out of those disperse locations once we get there to keep the mission moving from multiple locations throughout the area of operations. I just think this is a great opportunity for the Bloody Hundred to get our airmen away from the main base and out into multiple different challenging environments so that they can see and feel what it's like to operate forward, to operate in austere locations, but importantly to operate right alongside our joint and coalition partners throughout the UK, the Baltics, and the European theater.


you at home should know what those plans are instead of making the wealthy pay their fair share some Republicans some Republicans want Medicare and Social Security Sunset I'm not saying it's a majority contact my office I'll give you a copy I'll give you a copy of the proposal that means Congress doesn't vote I'm glad to see and I tell you I enjoy conversion amazing if Congress doesn't keep the programs the way they are they'd go away other Republicans say I'm not saying it's a majority of you I don't even think it's even a significant but it's being proposed by individuals I'm not politely not naming them but it's being proposed by some of you folks the idea is that we're not going to be we're not going to be moved into being threatened to default on the dead if we don't respond that right there was probably my favorite moment of the entire state of the Union address by president Joe Biden because he did something that he doesn't do enough and that is call out the extremism of Republicans and this moment was crucial because he kind of got them to show their cards so you saw the responses when he said that they want to cut Social Security and they were just indignant they feigned outrage you know Marjorie Taylor Greene and Mike Lee in particular their responses were interesting to me especially Mike Lee's but Marjorie Taylor Greene throughout the entire state of the Union you could hear her screaming at Joe Biden for various reasons and it was just genuinely embarrassing unhinged and trashy but exactly what I'd expect from Marjorie Taylor Greene but she responded to questions about why she chose to call out Joe Biden and here's what she said you know what people are pissed off and for the president of the United States come into the people's house and lie like he did about the economy the border and then act like he's terrified of China and unwilling to talk about the fact they spot on us last night yeah he he got exactly what he deserved and I am not sorry one bit and I don't think Speaker McCarthy is upset with any of us for her expressing our views and being unwilling to allow the president to lie what am I gonna do stand up and give golf claps no thank you I don't clap for liars I love how Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling out somebody else's lies while not being aware of the irony here she's one of the biggest liars and maybe she's not even lying maybe she's just genuinely misinformed about 99.9% of the issues that she talks about either way what she did was effectively turned the state of the Union into the Jerry Springer show and she did this last time with her and Bobord heckling Joe Biden if you'll all remember that but it's not that I am inherently against heckling the president during the state of the Union you know I don't care about civility or decorum but what I care about is why you're heckling the president so for example if Democrats during Trump state of the unions would have heckled him for the terrible things that he said I would have liked that so I'm not against the heckling it's me being against the dumb things that she's choosing to get outraged about and Mike Lee you saw that he was incredibly indignant at Biden calling out Republicans response or calling out Republicans wanting to cut Social Security now it's funny that he of all people would feign outrage considering the explicit things that he said about Social Security so this video was put together by the Midas touch where they juxtapose his reaction with things that he said about Social Security and you just you can't come back after you've said this like you can't pretend to support Social Security after you've been filmed saying this he wants to pull Social Security up by the roots and get rid of it I mean he's just saying it of all the Republicans who talked about the variety of ways that they want to undermine Social Security Mike Lee should be the least defended by Biden's remarks given what he said and just pause for a moment don't ever let this fact be lost on you when we're talking about how the GOP wants to cut Social Security that's your money if a bank were to just take the money that you deposited and give it to rich people or spend it on something you would be outraged right you'd view that as theft so conceptually we need to think about what the Republicans are doing as theft as well if you saw Mike Lee on the streets and you walked up to him and you snatched his tie or you stole his watch I'm not saying that you should do this but if you did that to him if you stole from him directly he would be outraged and justifiably so but when it comes to you since you're a peasant since what you want doesn't matter since your money is less important then he's perfectly fine effectively doing the same thing to you stealing from you and look it's not just Mike Lee who has proposed cuts to Social Security CNN reporter Daniel Dale reminded everyone of Senator Rick Scott's plan to sunset all federal legislation which was so unpopular that Mitch McConnell even had to come out and announce that plan because it would include Social Security as well and let's be clear Mitch McConnell wants to cut Social Security but he knows that you have to uphold this facade that Republicans don't want to cut Social Security because their base will never let them get away with that now there's more as Common Dreams explains beyond Scott's plan the Republican Study Committee the largest caucus of House Republicans released a budget proposal last year that advocated gradually raising the retirement age a change that would cut Social Security benefits across the board the Washington Post reported last month that some House Republicans have resurfaced the above plan and other possible changes including bipartisan trust fund commissions in recent days as they push for far-reaching federal spending cuts in exchange for any agreement to raise the US debt ceiling as part of a speakership deal with far-right House Republicans McCarthy agreed to advocate for a cap on federal spending at fiscal year 2022 levels which would entail deep cuts to education spending public health programs and other critical areas so let's be very clear these people are liars the Republican Party is lying to you and the only reason why you saw that strong reaction is because they were called out they absolutely want to cut Social Security they've been broadcasting it for decades now but they know that they have to uphold this facade that they want to protect Social Security because it would be deeply unpopular if they just said what they wanted to do which is why we always have to catch them saying it behind closed doors now Biden actually got them to applaud Social Security once he kind of backed them into a corner so let's watch that as we all apparently agree Social Security Medicare is off to the off the books now Social Security Medicare are lifeline for millions of seniors Americans have to pay into them from the very first paycheck they started so tonight let's all agree and we apparently are let's stand up for seniors show them we will not cut Social Security we will not cut Medicare America people they earned it if anyone tries to cut Social Security which apparently no one's gonna do if anyone tries to cut Medicare I'll stop them I'll veto it I'm not gonna allow them to take away be taken away not today not tomorrow not ever but apparently it's not gonna be a problem that was actually well played by Biden strategically speaking he got Republicans to go from bullying him to applauding him when he says that we should protect Social Security they know they have to uphold that facade but here's where Biden can really pin their balls to the wall for lack of a better word call their bluff right now and there's a way that you can do that as Nancy Altman the president of Social Security works suggested in an op-ed for common dreams the White House should now release a plan to expand Social Security and call on Republicans to release their own plan to protect Social Security and then you let the American people decide who's actually telling the truth exactly now the Republican Party they don't actually want to protect Social Security and I would bet that they wouldn't go along with the White House plan to do just that there's an easy fix if you want Social Security to remain solvent for decades you lift the cap on taxable income but Republicans want to create the sense of urgency and false sense that you're going to lose your Social Security if reforms aren't made immediately because that's the ways that they're going to undermine Social Security right they create this sense of oh my god it's going bankrupt we have to do something we have to act and take drastic measures to protect the program when we all know that the fix is really simple so if Biden were to propose lifting the cap on taxable income which would make Social Security solvent for decades they wouldn't go along with it we know that's lying so I think that that was well played by Joe Biden here now moving on I want to talk about another instance where the State of the Union essentially developed into the Jerry Springer show where Mitt Romney actually confronted George Santos on camera and we didn't know what was said at the time that this was caught but we now know thanks to George Santos detailing this exchange with the reporter so Mitt told him you don't belong here Santos responded by saying go tell that to the 142,000 that voted for me Mitt Romney said you're an ass Santos said you're a much bigger asshole I love it I love this so much you can tell that Mitt Romney made some remark to George Santos and I'm glad that he called him out I don't like Mitt Romney but I don't like George Santos either so I love whenever these goons fight each other but Mitt Romney explained why he decided to confront George Santos afterwards when reporters asked him about this I didn't expect that he'd be standing there trying to shake hands with every senator in the president of the United States given the fact that he's under ethics investigation he should be sitting in the back row and staying quiet instead of parading in front of the president and and people coming into the room he says he you know that he embellished his record look embellishing is saying you've got an A when he had an A minus lying is saying you you graduated from college you didn't even attend and he shouldn't be in Congress and they're gonna go through the process and hopefully get him out and but he shouldn't be there and if he had any shame at all he wouldn't be there why did you make a point to say that though I mean it was kind of out of your way to see was standing right there in the aisle shaking hands with everybody did he respond to you he may have I didn't hear yes so in case you didn't hear it he was asked at the end there if he was disappointed that Kevin McCarthy didn't call on George Santos to resign and he said yes so yeah now George Santos was not done with Mitt Romney because he decided to snipe at him via Twitter writing hey Mitt Romney just a reminder that you will never be president look I wish that Congress was comprised of politicians that actually cared about anything other than their own careers and petty bullsh** but this is what we have we have a bunch of lol cows that were forced to milk to distract us from the fact that Congress is sitting idly by as multiple crises go unaddressed and it's a sad fact it's dystopian but you know I'll still enjoy watching them fight each other any day of the week now if I can take a moment to just talk about Biden's date of the union I think that overall his speech was pretty good every single state of the union speech is bad every state of the union speech that I've ever heard I have been unimpressed with this one is no different but out of all of the unimpressive state of the union speeches this one is probably the best and I say that specifically because if you are a normie and you don't really follow politics too closely I think that hearing Biden say populist things like bringing jobs back that were shipped overseas manufacturing in America buying America first I think that these things are gonna resonate with the American people I think that him talking about the variety of ways that corporations are screwing working class people I think that that is going to land well with normal voters now currently polling says they's not doing too well I would predict that maybe he gets a little bit of a bump because of that speech and I think you know it's it's surface level things but if you go a little bit deeper you'll see that all of the things that Biden is proposing it doesn't go far enough when he talks about lowering the cost of healthcare I'm sorry but if we lived in a sane world you would be calling for Medicare for all he talks about how we should celebrate capping the cost of insulin for seniors on Medicare I'm sorry but if we lived in a sane world we would cap the cost of insulin for everyone and go further than that just make it free because guess what we're the richest country on the planet and we can afford to do that aside from that you know the American exceptional exceptionalism was present and insufferable the Republicans were insufferable heckling him at the dumbest moments that's not to say that Biden should not have been heckled for a couple of things that he said but they choose to heckle him for the dumbest reasons for example when he's talking about fentanyl what do they do they say oh close the border they all scream in unison close the border as if he's not doing the exact border policies that Trump was doing so they're all disingenuous both Republicans and Democrats but when it comes to who actually is closer to the American people at least rhetorically speaking I think that Biden made it clear that he is trying to appeal to normal working-class people now his actions don't line up with that rhetoric but still when it comes to overall appeal and how this speech is going to be perceived I think that it's gonna land pretty well either way it was a show because Republicans made it that way but at least it was a little bit entertaining so maybe we'll thank them for that either way it was an hour and a half or so that I wish I could get back if I'm being perfectly honest


Now we are going to see how to submit the assignments first in week one We are going to see the MCQ and MSQ type assignments click this quiz Select the answers the first four questions are MCQ multiple choice questions and the fifth question is MSQ multiple select you can see the checkbox here MCQ will be displayed as a radio button and you can see the checkbox in the MSQ type if it is a checkbox There will be one or more answers Just select the answers and submit the answers You'll be getting a message. Thank you for taking the assignment. If it is a multiple submission assignment you can Return to the assessment by clicking the back to post page and resubmit the assignment If it is a single submission, you can be submitted only once and you can see in the top corner of the assignment the due date for the assignment Within the due date you have to submit the assignment. Otherwise, you can't be able to submit the assignment and you will lose marks Secondly, we are doing a programming assignment In programming assignment first you have to select the language After selecting the language, you will have a console page to type the coding Once you type the code You can see the sample test cases sample input and sample output Save the program and submit the assignment. That's all you can submit the assignment like this If you have any queries regarding the assignment, you can ask it in the forum of the post page Professor or the teaching assistant of the professor will answer you regarding this