Good morning here in Davos, Switzerland and around the world. My name is Eric Schatzger. I'm an anchor and editor-at-large at Bloomberg Television. Welcome to an insight and idea with Marissa Meyer, the CEO of Yahoo. Marissa, good morning to you. Good morning. If I'm not mistaken, this is the first such conversation you've had since becoming CEO in July. Is that right? That's right. Well, I must thank you. It's an honor, both for me and for the World Economic Forum. We're here to talk about the future of technology. So let's begin with the one nut that nobody seems to have been able to crack, the platform shift from desktop to mobile. How do you crack that nut? Well, I think that one is really important. If you look at what's happening in terms of the shift to mobile, the number of mobile phones and smartphones in the world has tripled in five years. Tablet sales will outsell laptops this coming year. If predictions hold true. So it's really incredibly important. And there's a lot of consumers overall making this shift. So one is understanding how these devices work, what they really provide for, and how we can best meet users' expectations. And then of course the other piece is monetization. And that's the nut. There's all kinds of really interesting applications that exist on the phone. The real question is making money from it. And I have a lot of faith and confidence that whenever you see a consumer shift of this type, that there will be a very interesting value-added way to create a monetization around it. Where does that confidence come from? Well, it was sort of the bane of my existence from about 1999 to 2004, was that at the time I was at Google, and for about five years every time I interacted with anyone externally, the one question they would ask me is, you know, search is wonderful. It's so great to be able to find everything that we can find. It's just wonderfully academic. How is anyone ever going to make any money from it? And now that seems almost absurd because search is one of the giant money makers, not the giant money maker online. But that said, whenever you see consumers adopting a technology, a platform, a particular application like search with this much volume, you know that advertisers will want to participate in that. There's usually a way where you can introduce advertising such that it's not intrusive, that it actually adds value to the end user, and that it actually enhances the experience, and that's what we need to work on. Well, we can look backward now and see how that was done with search. Everybody gets to play Monday morning quarterback and feel smart about it. Can you tell yet what some of the shifts will be in mobile that will allow mobile to duplicate the success of search as a money maker? Because it has to make money or else at some point innovation will grind to a halt. Well, I think people already are. For example, the application store, there's a lot of people who sell applications. So there's some monetization there. I think the big thing is search is a daily habit, and what people do on their phones often become daily habits. It was interesting for me when I thought about the strategy for Yahoo, I pulled the list of what people do on their phones in rank order frequency. And if you ignore a few exceptions, the things that are going to be done by the carriers like voice and text and maps, because I know for my former life that it was really expensive and hard to do right, the list looks like email, check the weather, check news, get financial quotes, check sports scores, play games, share photos. You get the idea and it was funny because I would go and I would recite that list in the context of being the new CEO at Yahoo and I would say, what am I doing? And my friends and family would say, well, you're describing Yahoo's business. I said, no, actually what I'm doing is I'm listing in frequency order what people do on their phones. So the nice thing at Yahoo is we have all of the content that people want on their phones. We have these daily habits. We're dealing with a daily habit and really providing a lot of value around it. There's an opportunity not only to provide that value to the end user, but also to create a great business. To your point, search remains one of the defining experiences for most internet users. Whether we call it search, whether we call it content discovery, seems to me that it will remain the way you described it fundamental to what we do. How do you see it evolving? Well, I think that all of the innovations that you'll see in search will be in the user interface layer. So if you look at the past few years, there's been universal search, the notion that search won't always be text-based. You can get videos and images, instant search, so when you're typing, the fact that it's very speedy and responsive, voice search, the fact that now something like a quarter to a third of searches are done by voice on the phone. So all of those types of things are what we're going to see evolve in the future. And I also think that there is a huge opportunity in search around personalization, understanding what do I know already, what are my preferences, and how to present the information. And I think that that extends beyond just search, but broadly to discovery. If we can think about how do we take the internet and order it for you, there's all these news feeds all over the web that people will check, Twitter, Facebook. And the question is really what order should people read things in the morning? What should they look at? How should they do that? And to really do a great job in that kind of discovery mode, in addition to search, you need a terrific sense of personalization. Well, personalization then, in some respects, replace search that once the computer, so to speak, figures out what it is we like to look for, it'll just look for it on our behalf and we won't have to go and do it any longer. I think the right way to think of it is it's not that it replaces search, but it becomes a critical part of search. You know, I think one provocative way of thinking about it is, in terms of a lot of people say, well, when you type into the search box, that's your query. In the future, you become the query. It's what you typed. It's your background. It's where you are. It's your preferences. It's what you looked at yesterday. And the search box can take all of that as the input and come up with a set of results that are customized for you. And the nice thing is if you're the query, one, you could actually explicitly type in search terms, or you could just be the query passively. You know, this is the notion that if we can pick up on your context who you're talking to, where you are, can we actually provide useful information or a series of links, pictures, videos that are actually more useful in your current context because of that context. That sounds exciting, but right now, the web for most of us is still a very managed, curated experience. How long does it take before we get there, and what are the key enabling technologies going to be? Sure. I think it's probably going to happen in the next three to five years. I think that a lot of what we've seen happen, image recognition, voice recognition, translation. These were all backbone technologies to really being able to understand context. Now it's a matter of being able to take the personalized notions that people have already been expressing online. Things like likes on Facebook. What do you tweet? What do you pin on Pinterest? What articles do you click on? Taking all of those little signals and mapping those to understand that when, for example, I like clean energy on Facebook and I tweet out something about green energy, that's in fact the same interest of mine. Are different companies going to do it differently, or is this the kind of thing that everybody's going to have to move in the same direction on? I think that different companies will do it differently. I think that one of the key pieces here is you have to understand and decide what the ontology of entities is. Explain that. Meaning, how are things named? How are they organized into hierarchies? For example, you need to know that Wisconsin is a state and that there are cities inside of it. I'm from it, so if I say that I like Wisconsin, there's a whole bunch of interest that cascade off of that. You need to understand that hierarchy of objects, but you also need to be able to understand how they relate to each other and synonyms, deduplication, things like that. Does this personalization then become the way that you described it as somehow complementary to search? Does that create a new paradigm? We talk, or at least the most recent thing that any of the large internet companies has come out with is this social search that Facebook has introduced. Is that a stepping stone along the way to what you see? I think so. I mean, there's the social graph, which is really important and very fundamental. But I think what I'm talking about in terms of personalization, it will give way to the interest graph. What is that? The interest graph is the set of things that I'm interested in. And if you know the set of things that I'm interested in, you know the set of things other people are interested in, you can create connections between people that aren't just based on whether or not they went to the same school or worked in the same place, but are actually based on are they interested in the same things? So for one, we can create very powerful personalization technologies because we can see what other people who like the same things are interested in the same things that you are doing and provide you the same information through things like collaborative filtering. But there's also a very powerful social component there because we can show you interests you may have in common with people you didn't realize. For example, I recently found out that Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, and I both had the same major at Stanford Symbolic Systems. So you can see these kinds of things in the interest graph. But you can also find people who you maybe have never met but really should know because you have so much in common with them. It would seem to me that it's a pretty high bar or at least the barrier to entry to the interest graph is pretty high. You've got to have as a company, as a platform, a fairly broad and deep level of user engagement, don't you? That's right. And we're really very lucky at Yahoo because we have the homepage. We also have finance and sports and games and news and things like OMG, which is celebrity news. And so there's a lot of different verticals that we play in and then also very broad applications like search and mail. Does the interest graph have the potential to disrupt sort of the paradigm for tech power that was, in some respects, if not set, coined by your old boss, Eric Schmidt, the Four Horsemen, Google, of course, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon? Could the interest graph or perhaps even something else change that order of the universe? Well, I mean, I think all four of those players do a really terrific job providing a lot of great experiences for end users. And so I think that all four of those people will become major players in the future. I think that the piece that the Four Horsemen analogy misses is that there are other players in the space. I think, for example, Twitter is very exciting and very interesting. And I do think that technology isn't stagnant. It's amazing to think about the different waves of the internet and technology. The first wave really was Yahoo itself, the directory. There's these pages out there. How do you organize them? And then the web got so large that the directory model broke down and gave way to search. And then the next wave came with social. And now I really think we're on the mobile wave.  We've gone through four major technology shifts in terms of who the main players really are. And so I think that there's always opportunity for new disruption. And I think that a lot of this will be around interest, but that's just my prediction. So we shouldn't, as consumers or in any other role that we may occupy, worry about the control that certain companies may exercise over the internet itself and the information that it contains? Well, I mean, I think that privacy will always be something that users should consider. But I also think that privacy is always a trade-off. Because when you give up some of your personal information, you get some functionality in return. And so it's really about making those trade-offs in a very informed way, which really comes around, you know, for me, the core principles of privacy online are transparency, choice, and control. Tell the users what information you have and how you use it. Allow them to control what information you have and choice. Do they want to use the service in a personalized way that involves that information or not? And so I think those are really the big three components of privacy online. And I also fundamentally believe that user data belongs to the end user. You do. Yes. Because clearly, you know, the question of control is the one that gets people most exercised. How do you ensure, how does any company that participates in this space, this industry, whatever you want to call it, a guarantee that that remains the case and provide users with enough confidence that the information that they share isn't being abused? Well, the second part is all about transparency. You know, what searches do you have and exactly how are they being used? And so, and I do think that that's something that is really important. I think that there will be industry standards that arise in terms of really providing users almost an account statement. You know, if you look at some of the various dashboards around data that exist on some of these primary platforms, they really, what they really show you is what data do you have stored there and how is it used? And I really think that one of the key pieces here that also provides for a lot of user choice is making sure that the data is portable, that there are standardized formats which really allow your barrier to switching providers or switching carriers to be lower. So, you know, one of the analogies I'll use is papers you wrote in college. Are they yours? Absolutely. I feel like they are. What if, you know... Even if nobody else is interested. So, nothing about the searches that you've done over the past 10 years. Not nearly as coherent, not nearly structured, you know, in eloquent prose, but just as insightful in terms of they were your thoughts, your words expressed your way, and they tell a lot about what you know, what you've learned. And I do believe that fundamentally they're yours and if you can take that history, pick it up and move to a different search provider or take that as an interest graph in and of itself and apply it and use it in a different application, that's something that should fundamentally belong to you. You're allowing the service to access it in order to get better information and better results and they need to deliver on that promise or else you'll take your data and go elsewhere. Well, that raises an interesting question. Should you be able to take all of that data and it sounds to me like depending on how deep your level of engagement, it could be a great deal and move it from one platform to another, is that possible? I can see one platform being resistant to the idea of my taking all of what I've got and moving it to somebody else. It's certainly technologically possible and a lot of the players are providing for things like that. It's not something that's generally, you know, something that people think about doing every day but it is an option and I think that it's an important one. It can give users a lot of confidence in terms of how things are handled. You described a couple of months ago how one of your employees asked how Yahoo's going to compete if it doesn't have one of these four key distribution technologies. There's the mobile operating system, mobile hardware, the browser and social. I don't know that we got an answer. Yeah, it was always funny because one of our employees at one of the company meetings asked that and they said, you know, given that we don't have mobile hardware, mobile OS, a browser or a social network, how are we going to compete? And it's not just a question for you. Clearly it's a question for every company that seeks to compete with those others that have those key enabling technologies. Sure. And, you know, of the four horsemen of the internet to adopt that analogy, almost all of them are playing in one, if not several, of those medium. But I think that the big piece here is that it really allows us to partner. Yahoo's always been a very friendly company. It's always been because of our focus also, not in addition to technology, but also on media. It ultimately means that there's really an opportunity for strong partnerships, and that's what we'll be focused on. So we work with, for example, Apple and Google in terms of the operating system. In terms of the social network, we have a strong partnership with Facebook. And so we're able to work with some of these players that have a lot of strength in order to really bolster our user experiences that we offer on the Yahoo site. Is that diecast? You talked about, you know, this new graph, the interest graph, is that the kind of technology that will become key to distribution? Well, I definitely think with the web becoming so vast, there's so much content, and there's so much social context. And now with mobile, there's so much location context and activity context. How do you pull all of that together? And the interesting way to take it is to say, okay, we're going to use some of that information, your personalization, your context, what you've done, all of that, to actually make sense of the content. It's really the internet ordered for you. Which is interesting because it actually brings Yahoo back to its roots. It used to be that that's what Yahoo was. It took the internet and ordered it up. Now it's so vast that you can't just categorize anymore, but could we provide a list of information, a feed, if you will, of information that is ordered, is the web ordered for you. And it's also available on your mobile phone. Some of those technologies remain tremendously competitive. There's competition in the browser world. There's certainly incredible competition in the mobile hardware world and in the operating system world. What about social? Is the war for social over? I think that Facebook provides an amazing platform. And so I think that it will be one of the predominant platforms if not the predominant platform. But now what happens with social is what you do with it. It's not just about writing down who your friends are. It's actually about taking that and finding useful content and telling me, hey, you're in Davos right now. Do you know who else is? And being able to offer me the opportunity to opportunistically meet up with someone who I didn't know would be here. There's a natural conflict isn't there in the world of technology between innovation and execution. We see many companies struggling with it. Can both be done well at the same time? It's funny because it was pointed out to me a few years ago that one hypothesis is that innovation, if you think about what's the opposite of innovation, a lot of people will say, well, it's the status quo. It's stagnancy. And there's another school of thought which says that the opposite of innovation is execution. That if you have to be in heads down execution mode, it's very hard to find the space to innovate, to have those new ideas and to pull things in. And I know that for us at Yahoo right now, this is going to be a great period of execution. Can we take these products that we have and revitalize them for the web and also make the transition to mobile? And while we're doing that execution, will there be room to innovate to say, hey, this is how Yahoo groups worked on the web, but now there's all these new opportunities in terms of how group communication should work on the phone? Can we actually spot some of those innovative ideas? And I think there is, but it's hard because I do think that they are natural opposites. Is size a barrier to innovation? I don't think so because I think that it has to, you can innovate at scale and with large size, but you have to be very principled about it. You know, if you have, say, 10 engineers and you're going to grow that to be 20 or 30, do you want to be doing the same set of things two or three times better, or do you want to be doing two or three times more things? And in terms of really, you know, interestingly, in terms of execution, this is a great example of why there's so much opposites that if you really wanted to execute perfectly, get the design exactly right, really work through all the details, you'd invest two to three times as many people per project. If you want to find those new ideas, those far-flung ideas, those things you might not otherwise find, you want to take those same people and put them on something that's far-flung that you've never thought about. And so it really is that there is this tension. You can innovate at scale, but you need to save room to have small teams working on those far-flung ideas. So share with us a little of your experience over the past few months. You arrived to an innovative company, but perhaps there was too much going on, wasn't disciplined enough to the points that you were just making. What have you focused on? What are you most excited about when it comes to innovative technologies, particularly the ones that you have some control over? Well, I was really overall just genuinely pleased and surprised. I knew that there had to be great people at Yahoo. The same way that when you sometimes look at art, you can tell if it was created by a nice person or not, or a depressed person or not. When you feel Yahoo's products, you can tell that there's really nice, very smart, competent people there that have a great time. And it's true that it's a great company overall that has a very fun culture. And for my first few months, it really was on people. Because I believe fundamentally that technology companies live and die by talent. And that's why when people talk about the talent wars, it's not really that some of the companies that are in the talent wars are that competitive with each other. It's just that when you start to see the best people migrating from one company to the next, it means that the next wave is starting. And so I got very focused on people building the right team, particularly the executive layer, business, and also the overall environment. And part of that was because I wanted to make sure that Yahoo is absolutely the best place to work, and that people really want to come and work there, because that will help with the talent piece. But also because I believe that really strong companies all have very strong cultures. And Yahoo's no exception. It's been a very strong company for a very long time. It's got a strong culture. It's different from every other corporate culture. Each has their own unique and individual flavor. And I really wanted to find a way to amplify it. Isn't amplifying it? That's how you find the energy. And the energy is what you can harness into that innovation and say, OK, if we have people and they are really excited about what they're working on every day and they realize that the next big hurdle is mobile, you can take that energy around the culture and find fun ways to apply it that can be really impactful for end users. What are some of the things that you found that we're going to see over the next few months? Well, I don't like to talk about things before we do them. But I do think that a lot of the keys are what I've already talked about. I think that there is a real opportunity to help guide people's daily habits in terms of what content they read. That's something that we're really working on. I think that all of these daily habits, news, sports, games, finance, search, mail, answers, groups, these are the types of things where we've really been under-invested in them and a little love will go a long way. It turns out I learned the other day that Yahoo! groups, which I remember using really pervasively back in 2001 because I was friends with the founders, it hasn't been refreshed in like 11 years. So it will go a long way if we actually start to modernize some of these products. So basically identifying what are some of these key technologies. I do think that the user-generated content component is something that Yahoo! very much pioneered with things like Yahoo! Answers and Yahoo! groups. And Flickr, for example, was one of the first social photo services. Now a lot of people think a lot more about user-generated content and video, which is also really important. But going back to some of those roots of saying, okay, now that social really allows everyone to be a publisher and for you to find interesting questions to answer, find topics where you're a domain expert and write about them, and for your friends and others who know that you're an expert in that field or know you to come and find your answer, I really do think that there's something very powerful that we can unleash there in terms of the content that we can surface friend users and its utility. How about elsewhere in the world of technology, whether it's at big companies or little startups, what other innovations excite you? Oh, I don't know. I think that there's so many things. This is a question I like to ask people. And the one answer you never want to give is, oh, I'm very discerning. There's nothing that good out there. I mean, I think there's amazing things that you get to see all the time. There's all kinds of amazing technologies on mobile. When you think about, for example, just what it means to be location sensitive. Location is something I've spent a fair amount of time in the past few years thinking about. There's all kinds of really terrific technologies there. Some of these are very basic in terms of things like being able to check in. So there's Foursquare, but if you actually know where people are and where they check in, there's all kinds of interesting and sophisticated things you can go on to do. So I think that there's amazing technologies like that. But even branching out from, say, the mobile technologies and desktop technologies, there's just terrific things happening overall in the world of biotech in terms of being able to do DNA analysis, analyze and help infertile couples actually do a better job selecting children and embryos to implant because you know whether or not they have problematic mutations. There's a great company I know of there called Netera. There's an amazing company that's working on wireless power. This is the thing of Atlas Shrugged. Can you have an automated energy machine? But it actually can happen. They actually think that you can send energy using waves. You have to be pretty close. But just think about what that might mean in terms of all this running around and plugging things in. You might just need to get close enough to the router that you can pick up on the power. And what that could do for the world of advertising, if you know, for example, this sign at the bus stop that's lit up from behind actually had wireless power behind it, you could sit there at the bus stop and charge while you're using your device. It would be pretty amazing. So there's all kinds of really exciting new things that people work on every day. When people get excited about technology, they often forget about the role of design. Apple taught us. Apple changed the way that many of us interact with technology, interact with the internet itself. And that maybe form can be as important or perhaps more so than function. How much do you think about that? How important is it to what you're doing? Well, I think about design a lot. I think that Apple is obviously the gold standard. But I think that in that, Apple's philosophy really is that the design and the technology itself should fall away. And I think that's really true because a lot of these interaction technologies become really powerful when they do just fall away. I think the amazing thing about tablets, the fact that you can just flick and get rid of things and switch from page to page, the pinch, the zoom, these are things that are so intuitive that you actually can see small children begin to use a tablet. There's terrific videos that parents, proud parents will upload showing children that before they can even learn to talk, they know how to turn the page and flick things on iPads. And they can navigate within videos to their favorite part. They can't even express why they like that part. But they know how to get there using the gestures on the tablet. But what's really powerful about that is it uses the natural paradigms that people already have embedded in their minds that are somewhat innate to us. And they allow it to be the way that we use this technology. And I think that that's incredibly powerful. And so that's overall what you really want to have happen, is being able to whittle away the technology such that all of the complication lies underneath, just like an iceberg. There's just that thin little layer that you interact with. I think that's one of the reasons, for example, why voice recognition has taken off to the degree that it has and why Siri is something that is so interesting for people, is because this notion that you could just talk, right, you could just say what you're thinking and transcribe an email or transcribe a text or transcribe a search, that is just the way that you navigate and have every day of your life. And now there's this whole set of technology and supercomputers that just with your voice you can actually have do what you want them to do. Is that to say that a level of curation that's something akin to a walled garden isn't such a bad idea and may actually be necessary? Well, I think that there's a clear tension there of open systems versus closed. I do think that the application system that exists in iOS and in Apple is very curated but absolutely beautiful. And you can tell that the reason I don't think that's such a bad thing is because it's really raised users' expectations of design. Where people didn't, I think, used to think about design or appreciate it that much. The fact that when you see something that's really beautiful, it does create a lot of respect for it. And I think that one of the reasons why Apple has garnered so much praise for its design is that it's made sure that, for example, the entire ecosystem of applications on that platform work and perform just beautifully. And when you notice that, you start to realize the role the design really plays in your everyday life. Marissa, I want to thank you on behalf of the World Economic Forum for this opportunity and insight and idea with Marissa Meyer of the Future of Technology. Thank you. Thank you.


Felly, rwy'n gobeithio, rydym yn cael y llyfr o'r cyffredinol gyda'r bwysig.  Bydd y cwmysiwn i'r defnyddio i ddweud, dwi'n meddwl i'r defnyddio i'r defnyddio i ddweud yr adeiladio i ddweud, a the penalty payment, which was launched by the Commission in Case 40107. The Commission started the proceedings against the Netherlands and a deal was done, and an agreement was reached that the Dutch government would introduce legislation to remedy the defect. Now, we were talking about the role of the Civil Courts just before they made a what's also interesting as a background here, is that when the Commission started demanding of the Dutch Government that they recover this interest, the Dutch Government said, Tell me, well we can't do it through the administrative route, that's not allowed, the Council of State said no, so we have to go the civil route. So we can still try through civil proceedings based on Unjustified Enrichment to get this remaining interest, but it will take years they said, and we can't guarantee success. Felly, mae gennym ni'n gwneud i'r newydd. Felly, mae'n meddwl i'r cyffredinol. Mae'r cyffredinol yn ymddangos i'r gyffredinol, eich bod yn ymddangos i'r cyffredinol, a'r credu sy'n meddwl i'r cyffredinol. Felly, mae'n rhaid i'r cyffredinol i'r arwad y bydd yma, ddifanodd y ffordd o'r ffordd rydyn ni'n gweld i'r gweithio. Rwyf wedi gweithio'r newidau i'w ddechrau yng Nghymru i'r Gweithio, ac mae'r cyffredinol yn ei ddysgu amddangos, sy'n gwybod, sy'n gwybod a'r gwahodd a'r gwahodd i'r gwahodd a'r gwahodd a'r gwahodd i'r gwahodd a'r gwahodd i'r gwahodd i', i'r rhan o'r rhan o'r cyffredinol i'r ddweud o'r ddweud y maen nhw'n gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r ddweud. Yn ymgyrch yn ymbylch, mae'r ddweud yn ddweud y pheriad o'r Llyfrgellau Llyfrgellau Cresgryffydd, Mae'r ddau cyfathpeti o'r Gylaedd, mae'r ddau yn ddau yng nghydillydd fiberaidd, agddsianol iawn yn ddau'i ddau hyffordd ac yn y ddau gyfan ddau dechrau. Ac y llyfrod y cyfaniedig yn ddau yna yn ddau'n gydagos, ac mae'n gyrraedd y clywedol eich ddau cyffredig a oedd y ddau cyfathpeti i'r ddau'r gyffredig, depends on whether you're dealing with tax law, civil law or admin law, and that they range from three to five years generally, and then there are tax. It's generally five years, but there are exceptions where there could be as long as 12 years. Obviously limitation periods apply at different times, you have in some cases you have to start completely action within the limitation period, Sometimes they apply, having taken a decision, you have a number of years to enforce it, so I haven't gone into that here in any detail, this whole issue of limitation periods, something we can talk about, because it's a big issue in Italy as well, but the idea of the legislation as proposed back in 2008 would have been then to just harmonize for recovery at least, the limitation period would be standardised for 10 years, and I presume that the idea was 10 years then from the date of the decision of the commission, because there can always be an argument as to when that period starts to run of course. So there was, when that legislation was first launched, quite a lot of discussion about how appropriate it was, did it go too far, or did it not go far enough, because one of the things that it was linked to was a decision of the commission. So there had to be a decision of the commission, and that would then spark the procedure under this proposed legislation. Now there was a lot of discussion as to what was a decision of the commission, because the legislation proposed that there would be a link between the recovery procedure and a final decision of the commission. Now what is a final decision of the commission, is it one that the commission itself adopts at the end of the formal procedure requiring recovery, or is it one that has been subject then to appeal, or I should say annulment, and then appeal if necessary, and has withstood then any annulment action, or has been amended as a result of an annulment action before the court. So what is final, that wasn't clear. Now from a community point of view, a European point of view, that seemed to be not a very important discussion because the recovery obligation enters into force when the decision is adopted. And the annulment action at the European level has no suspensory effect unless of course there are very special circumstances where you can ask for an injunction. So from a European law point of view, final is not really much of a discussion, but it was a discussion at national level. It would start this machinery and not give the aid beneficiary the opportunity to fully challenge the commission decision. Now I think that that situation could have been resolved because if a national judge was concerned about the legality of the commission decision, they can always refer questions of course to the European Court of Justice. They could under certain circumstances, we can maybe talk about that, suspend the national proceedings. So I think that part of the discussion was a bit of storm in the teeth, as we say in English, but maybe you follow our ideas. There was also some discussion as to whether it was a good idea to amend the General Tax Act and include recovery there. Because the idea had been at least in 2008 in that legislation that you would introduce then a new fiscal measure as the basis for recovery. And there was some discussion amongst tax lawyers at least as to whether or not that was suitable to equate the recovery with a new tax. That was the approach. Anyway, for whatever reason the bill never progressed through Parliament, it was dropped. And in fact in June 2016 a new bill was launched, which in some way is similar to the 2008 proposal, but differs in important respects. It's still a draft. It has been subject to commentary by the Council of State. Our Council of State is divided in two and one division can comment on legislative proposals. And one of the lines of commentary is often at the European angle in any event. And the commentary here, of course, has been published by the Council of State. It's very much based on state aid from a European perspective. I don't know if you have the same, does your Council of State also give commentary advice? Indeed, in 2016 the bill was launched then it goes to our Council of State. The Council of State was quite critical of it. But although it's not binding what the Council of State said, the government takes it into account and they have to reply to those criticisms and explain whether or not they think they are of value and whether they're going to modify the legislation or not. And that is all publicly available information. So indeed, we have a new version before Parliament at the moment as we don't have a government, things are a bit slow at the moment. When I left yesterday, there was still no government. There was still no government. We're waiting for that. We're trying to beat the Belgian record. I think we're nearly there. So things are all a bit slow. So indeed, the idea is now to have a uniform procedure for all cases. And it doesn't matter what the origin of the illegal state is, whether it's private or public or whether it's a result of tax measures that can all qualify for recovery, albeit that there has to come to different procedures. But what is important and what has been a point of discussion is that these procedures are only applicable when the European Commission orders recovery. So not when a national court orders recovery. The Council of State was critical on that point. They said, well, why treat them differently? They're equally important. And therefore, if a national court is ruled on recovery, then this procedure should apply. And the government replied to that by saying, let's wait and see. They said, well, recovery is very complex. The question of whether there should be recovery ordered is complex, how to calculate. In a commission decision, it might be clearer. That's what they think. That's not necessarily the case, as I explained at the beginning. We'll hear more about. But what they said was, look, what the government's point of view is that if a national court is ordering recovery of aid, it is using EU principles. So on the basis of the direct applicability of the state aid rules, the principle of law of cooperation, there should be no issue about recovery anyway. Plus, now we have the new legislation. So we have another argument, and that is the principle of equivalence. So according to EU law, national procedural law is autonomous, but you have to conform to the principle of effectiveness and equivalence. So if you have a procedure in national law, you have to make it available also for EU law remedies. So the government thought that there was no reason to have an explicit inclusion for national court rulings. Now, maybe that's something we can come back to in the discussion, compare that with your time situation, whether that is a good way or not for going forward. So who has to determine the recovery? The reason I put that there was going back to the study. I'll just skip back there. The commission did a study in 2006 as to enforcement of the state aid rules at national level, which our law firm was partly involved in. One of the things that transpired from the study was that it was not always clear which body had to reclaim the aid. It was also not also clear who had to pay the aid, apart from the procedural question. So the legislation proposes then that the body that granted the aid will be the one that has to determine how much has to be refunded, and that this will include then the famous interest. So that issue will be finally resolved. So, as we'll hear, I mean, I think when we look at the media set case, it's not always so easy to calculate. Okay, so then we get to the tax. So in the original proposal from 2016, tax was not going to be covered. That again was subject to a lot of criticism from the Council of State. Now, at the time when the proposal was introduced, as far as I could see what the government was saying was, we're going to deal with tax separately, and we'll come with a new proposal on recovery of tax in a separate measure. But then, as a result of the criticism of the Council of State, and perhaps for other reasons, they decided then to combine then in the final procedure, then provision that allows then state aid in the form of a tax to be recovered through the tax system. That's tax payable. So the separation anyway that we have in the proposed law, as it now stands, is that if the aid has been paid through tax, it will be recovered as tax, and that if tax authorities then will have to come up with new tax measures, like I think in Dutch tax law, you can anyway make a new assessment if there is a new fact. And it's based on that assumption that state aid recovery decision from the Commission is a new fact, and therefore you can make as a tax inspector a supplementary assessment, or a so-called law settlement decision, and that would be the way to effect recovery. Great discussion though about how you deal with all these problems. If you have to reassess everything, how far do you go?  So how far does the adjustment and amendment have to go? That I think is purely a question of national law. There's no European law guidance there, as far as I'm aware. That's a question of national law, but maybe that's also something that's worth talking about, because the idea behind recovery, of course, is to restore the status quo ex-ante, as if the advantage had never been given. But it seems to me that the other side of the coin then is if you take away everything that was considered an advantage, you would still have to restore the things you would have been entitled to, but for the advantage. But this opens up a huge area of discussion, because you can't give... I mean, one of the big issues with tax rulings at the moment is, suppose, and many of them are thinking about it, suppose these multinationals sued the governments, because the government issued the ruling, it was the government that didn't notify, it was the government that said, yeah, this is all okay, so the government gets a windfall, and so there is some discussion as to whether or not this will go to arbitration under bilateral taxation treaties. And then the question arises, suppose an arbitration tribunal awards damages, is that then stated through the back door? Now, do we have a big case going on, maybe you've heard about it, make you laugh? As far as I know, one of the companies that are now ruling a fair, a fierce crisis, part of the government that should be ordered to cover the tax worker because the company of the group that in light of the season benefited from the aid that was made in the tax worker, but as you said, in case this season is correct, and so the tax worker has to recover this, this will detail the other company saying that the group without the company paid more taxes. And so, this is sort of a trust price that we're waiting for, and so, as far as I know, Fiat Chrysler Italian launched an action for refund, to get refund, in case the ECJ will state that the season is correct, you have to pay more taxes in anilaxiwyr. The Italian, the entire group and the Italian company has already launched an action for the Italian authority. Please, refund me the overpay, all the tax that the tax worker and the aid that you got. You really need a trust price in this, or to pay less, to pay more, to pay less. For the people in each constituency, the same income costs. I think here, I just want to say that situation is not clarified in the new proposals, and I think nobody would expect it to be clarified yet. I mean, it's such a new situation, I don't think you would deal with it in legislation. But I mean, we will have, I suppose, from a tax point of view, we will have measures coming from the EU that will help clarify this in the future. Not so much for recovery, but on group taxation generally, I suppose. So, for the future, it might become clearer, but for the past... You're right. It is some clear situation for future. But in this case, if it could be easier to get involved, because we have a decision of the European Commission that ordered the maximum to the forward. So, we have a formal decision, not from the European Commission, that ordered the maximum to the forward. So I have to... I have to pay the government, pay the revenue, and I have to... I have to find the group... ..the entire group of... ..the companies. The advantage is that this situation is present in the EU with the foreign company orders. The theory outside the EU... ..the problems in the EU.  How do you indeed deal with the knock-on effect? I think that that's one important issue. The other is, to what extent, in Italy should then... I mean, one of the arguments could be that Italy should go to Luxembourg and recover the money from Luxembourg and then pay it to the EU. But we don't have any precedence where a Member State has gone and pursued another Member State. That's not happened. The only famous case where one government has gone to another government to seek recovery is the Ryanair case where the Belgian, the Wallunion government, started proceedings in Ireland to recover aid that Ryanair had received. But they were dropped, those proceedings. So we still don't know to what extent one court would honour a claim by another Member State against its authorities. That's all new in its own new areas. So these are... There's nothing in the legislation and the Dutch government isn't going to take a position on that yet because it's not clear that the EU law compels in the current time and its current state that it has to make any kind of adjustments. So I think everybody's waiting for these things to be fought out through the courts. But I mean, we've seen after Apple, the Apple ruling, or even before its final ruling that the Irish Tax Authority started sending out to lots of companies requests for information about where they were paying taxes and how much they've paid. So you saw that they were already, I think, looking at whether they missed tax and how they were going to claim it in the future. So it will involve, I think, a lot of litigation in these tax rulings. But on the arbitration point, in the sense that by granting the tax ruling you encourage some investor protection position I mean, that will also be an important area. Because suppose then, just suppose that Starbucks was to sue the Dutch government and get some of the money back, is that then state aid? And that, of course, if you're awarded damages, is that going to be considered state aid? And we have a case before the general court called Mikura, which involves an arbitration settlement, not tax case. It was a case about regional subsidies in Romania. Those subsidies were withdrawn by the Romanian government shortly after Romania became a member state. The arbitration tribunal ruled that that had all been done wrongly and that the Romanian state owned Mikura, Mikura, two Swedish brothers. Mikura then was entitled to compensation. Now the commission went totally ballistic and brought an action against the Romanian court that enforced the arbitration award. So what's interesting there is that you see that national judicial authority can grant state aid. So for you, as judges, if you grant damages you're a source of state aid. Which is something to remember. There's also been a recent Greek case where a Greek tribunal, the Greek court threw out a tariff adjustment in the electricity sector, which the commission had required a tariff adjustment. And the Greek court said that this adjustment is not conformity with Greek law so it's not being done properly. Therefore it was illegal so the tariff reverts back to the high tariff, which the commission said was a state aid. And the European court said that Greek court should have notified that for state aid clearance. It's completely ridiculous, but that is taking the idea that a court is capable of conformity with state aid. So in the mix in the case that the commission issued an injunction to stop the National Court of Romania enforcing the award. And what we're now seeing is the commission running around the world also stopping that award being enforced anywhere as you mentioned. It's one thing when things are between member states, but when you have other jurisdictions so make sure you're trying to free Romania's assets in the states and the commission intervened in those cases in the states trying to stop that happening that was thrown out by the Welsh courts. The commission had no standing. But you see the international dimension really increasing now of state aid enforcement. In Belgium make it a try to see the assets of the remaining government in Belgium. But the Belgian Court of Appeal has rejected that on the grounds that this would be state aid. And pending so they've suspended the procedures before the Court of Appeal pending the outcome of the court ruling. And a similar case brought in the UK High Court and the UK High Court has also said we're not going to freeze the assets until we know what the court will do in Luxembourg. And this is all on the basis of the duty of loyalty between 19 courts and the European Court. So you can see that that's really important. Another case I find really interesting is an Italian case called Simet. Which is also about compensation in damages being state aid. And that's part of that has not been settled. But that was also a case where Oval compensation. Oval compensation. So where your council of states said in fact this Simet bus company should have had compensation for running regional bus services. And there before the government paid compensation they asked the commission for pay rates. Of course the commission said it was over compensation and that was state aid. And that was back to the European courts and the European courts said that paying that compensation is a form of state aid. So for the tax ruling cases that's also quite important really from the European courts that you can't pay the state aid. You know they see that kind of compensation in damages as state aid through the back door. So if the administration is being careless it's not very easy to get redress for recovery. It's the beneficiary that has to pay up and the role of legitimate expectations that we've touched on and we maybe look back at that later on.


Hello, and welcome to this presentation of the STM32Cube firmware drivers, including the hardware abstraction layer drivers. While this presentation is specifically about the STM32G0, the STM32Cube comprehensive software tool offers STM32Cube MX graphical software configuration tool used to generate initialization code based on user choices. A complete embedded software package for each STM32 series, such as our STM32Cube G0 with hardware abstraction layer and low-layer APIs, a consistent set of middleware components, RTOS, USB, TCPIP graphics, etc. The embedded software package is a layered approach, low-level hardware abstraction layer or HAL with libraries and examples, middleware level, set of libraries with examples including RTOS, USB, TCPIP, etc. The figure highlights the library's relevant for STM32G0, FAT file system, free RTOS and USB power delivery, application level, demonstrations for use on ST boards. Embedded software is delivered by series, STM32G0, STM32L4, etc., and common modules are covered with fully portable APIs. Embedded software initialization code can be generated through STM32Cube MX, allowing the customer to remain focused on the core application code. The STM32Cube package is a complete embedded software offer that ensures maximum portability between all STM32 series through three software layers, HAL, middleware, and applications. The HAL layer is providing an API for the STM32 embedded peripherals from analog to connectivity. A rich set of examples is available to help developers start using the HAL and the product. The middleware layer contains a full USB power delivery. There is also a CM-SYS RTOS implementation with free RTOS, an open source solution, and a FAT file system based on an open source FATFS solution. Advanced demos putting together all the embedded software components are also provided in the STM32Cube G0 package. There is a complete set of documents including release notes, readme files, or associated user manual. The packages come with free and user-friendly licensed terms. Like all STM32Cube firmware packages, the STM32Cube G0 firmware solution comes in a single zip file having the structure shown in this slide. It's organized in several main folders. The documentation folder contains the STM32Cube G0, getting started document, helping developers to quickly become familiar with the firmware package and its contents. The drivers folder contains all the ST developed drivers. CM-SYS contains the files defining STM32G0XX supported devices, peripheral registers declarations, their associated bit definitions, and address mapping. STM32G0XXHAL driver folder contains the drivers for all the peripherals. The drivers for all supported boards are found in the BSP folder. Middleware contains the supported middleware libraries and stacks provided either by ST or third parties. The projects folder contains templates, examples, applications, and demonstrations for supported boards and with preconfigured projects and specific readme files that provides all necessary information for a quick and easy execution. The utilities folder contains miscellaneous utility drivers that are used by the provided projects. Through its generic architecture, STM32Cube offers a highly portable hardware abstraction layer. It allows developers to implement application functions by building on layers, such as the middleware layer, without requiring any in-depth knowledge of the MCU. This improves the reusability of the library code and guarantees an easy portability to other devices. In addition, thanks to its layered architecture, STM32Cube G0 offers full support of all STM32G0 microcontrollers and the development boards designed by ST. The user has only to define the correct macro in the STM32G0XX.H file and get in touch with BSP drivers and example and application projects specific to each board provided within the firmware package. For each board, a set of examples is provided with preconfigured projects for EW ARM, MDK ARM, and SW4 STM32 tool chains. The right-side figure shows the project structure for Nucleo G071RB board, which is identical for all the other boards. The examples are classified depending on the STM32Cube level they apply to and are named as follows. Examples in Level 0 are called examples and use HAL drivers without any middleware component. Examples in Level 1 are called applications and provide typical use cases of each middleware component. Examples in Level 2 are called demonstration and implement all the HAL, BSP, and middleware components. The template project is provided to quickly build any firmware application for all supported boards. The STM32Cube project list file allows a quick access and search for a given example within the firmware package. All examples have the same structure. INC folder contains all header files. SRC folder contains the sources code. EW ARM, MDK ARM, and SW4 STM32 folders contain the preconfigured project for each tool chain. A README text file describes the example behavior an environment needed to make it work. Note that most of the examples have a .IOC file enabling the configuration of the firmware from CUBE MXTool. Rich documentation is associated to the STM32Cube G0 firmware package. Some documents are generic to all STM32 series and others are specific to the STM32G0 series. The getting started with the STM32Cube G0 firmware package user manual is the document that you need to read first when you start using the STM32Cube firmware package. The STM32Cube G0 firmware can be downloaded from ST website at www.st.com.stm32cubefw.


This is a short video of our paper Rotational Differential Linear Distinctures of ArcCypher with arbitrary output linear marks. I am Zhong Feng. This is joint work with Sui Sun, Yu Wen Liu and Chao Li. Differential and linear cooper analysis are the most general method to analyze block cypher. There are some combined varieties including boron differential linear and rotational differential linear. And the differential linear can be considered as special cases of rotational differential linear. In this talk, we will focus on rotational differential linear. For vectorial boolean function, given the rotational input difference delta output mass gamma, we can build a rotational differential linear distinction by a linear approximation of rotational output difference. And the problem is how to estimate the correlation. Often, we divide the cypher in two parts, and the correlation of rotational differential linear distinction is attempted as 4 times p times epsilon times epsilon prime. But the ball method may not be accurate. For differential linear cooper analysis, the differential linear connective t-ball was proposed to accurately compute the correlation of differential linear distinction. In the future, at Corrupto-2021, another method was proposed to compute the correlation of differential linear distinction from algebraic points. But the ball-2 method is only applicable for the spin cyphers, not for the axe cyphers. And for rotational differential linear cooper analysis, more Veski's technique is adopted to compute the correlation of rotational differential linear distinguishes. However, the main problem is that it is only applicable for the output mass with hand width 1. About motivation, first, for the axe cypher, differential linear cooper analysis is one of the most powerful methods. Compute the correlation of differential linear distinction for axe cypher is attractive. Second, modular addition is a core component for axe cypher. Some properties must be clarified, such as the correlation of differential linear or rotational differential linear. However, for modular addition, there is no phenomenal time algorithm to compute the correlation of differential linear or rotational differential linear. And in practice, the modular addition often operates on large words, unlike S-books. The way of immune-during the input pair is inflexible. In this paper, we will solve the following two problems. For the first problem, we propose the partition scheme of the overall input space. Based on it for modular addition, we give a formula that can compute the exact correlation of arbitrary differential linear distinguishes and rotational differential linear distinguishes in phenomenal time. For the second problem, we completely generalize the Movisky's technique and give the new method to estimate the correlation of arbitrary differential linear distinguishes and rotational differential linear distinguishes for axe cypher. Then, we apply it on round-reduced assets sit-hush, cha-cha, and spec, and it works very well. We get a series of practical distinguishes and we summarize it on the table.


Hello and welcome to a special video. Today I've been invited down to see like an exclusive viewing of Time Diver. This is Japan's like biggest dinosaur show. I think it might be their only dinosaur show. T-Rex, Stegosaur, Allosaurus, Triceratops, Pregasaur. Anything you could think of is here. This is the first time that I've been to a dinosaur show so I'm really interested in looking forward to it. And I think if you are you know you're in Japan and you're thinking dinosaur enthusiasts like me you can't afford to miss this. So why not we waste any more time and just get to it shall we? I couldn't film any of the entrance as it was still being set up at the time but I was sent this footage by someone who attended the event when it was open. We did however get to film some of the merchandise including this amazing T-Rex which is based off the T-Rex in the actual show and only 500 of these were made. I was also told that the whole seating area rotates allowing for one stage to be on show while the other ones prepared in the bag. And I couldn't have prepared myself for what I was about to go into next. After climbing some steps I was greeted with this scene. And I have to admit this is a lot bigger than I was expecting and because we were invited to the rehearsal you know before the show actually opened to the public we had this whole area to ourselves and what happened to be on the stage nothing but an allosaur just you know practicing its moves. And with the screen closed and the lights dimmed we set up to capture the biggest dinosaur show in Japan. Hey look it's me! Apparently dinosaurs are gonna walk down the middle and um they might nibble on you but I can't wait to see it and I think they like the screen splits open and wow this is this is way more than I expected it to be 100%. Even though I don't understand Japanese too well I was able to understand the show well enough to know what was going on. We opened up with a little presentation of Earth's history and dinosaurs before kidnapping this unsuspecting woman and sending her back in time. I guess you could say she was the real time devil and with that we were teleported back in time to the Jurassic period which she seems absolutely thrilled about apparently super as she indeed and then we see our first dinosaur a mother and a baby stegosaurus as well as a hubbub versus dinosaur who was just kind of loitering in the background however it does have a cute interaction with the baby stegosaurus. What are you doing? All jokes aside these costumes looked really good even close up the eyes open and closed and even the thagamizer on the end of the stegosaurus tail swung back and forth best of all it even pooped and then all of a sudden an allosaurus appeared luckily I wasn't on the allosaurus menu today and in true dinosaur documentary fashion we had a tense scene where the allosaurus stalked the baby stegosaurus oh and then in true Japanese fashion we had this moment felt like it was right out of dragon ball and with that slight distraction buying some time the mother arrived but before the fight could really get underway it was interrupted by the giant of the Jurassic there really isn't any way that you can convey how big this thing actually was without being there it's like I'm watching tv except for it's coming right at me when I first saw it I thought it was quite small but as it got closer and closer to the front I realized just how gigantic this thing was it's a better interaction than Sarah holding now and I thought that some of these dinosaurs would be puppets on movable bases like when nobody saw of manning them but no these were all manned with people inside them so I have no idea how they did this brachiosaurus but that was the end of the Jurassic period then after a short jump through time we ended up in the ocean and to simulate that you were underwater they had these really cool jellyfish that almost moved in slow motion after now really avoiding being eaten by some mosasaurs we joined up with a pair of Utah raptors this is when it started to feel like a real dinosaur documentary they performed a courtship dance communicated with each other and protected their nest from an invading Utah raptor but alas it was all for naught as from nowhere a huge sandstorm came and killed them so that was cheery and then we had a 20-minute break well that was actually packed with a lot of motion as well and after seeing all those dinosaurs in front of me I thought I'd give the cameraman my best dinosaur impression I was told that they wanted to put more emphasis on the skies with this show so I was looking forward to seeing what they would do with it there was a little scene where a baby geostombersia dropped a fish and when the cretosaurus went over to investigate it was chased off by the male I have to say that this geostombersia looked really good I've seen a lot of dinosaur puppets and costumes in my time but not one as detailed as this is and the way it walked was super convincing I think they really pulled it up well here I also got my first ever close encounter with a dinosaur I felt like a regular old David Attenborough and they also had one suspended mid-air to simulate it flying which I thought was a nice touch the cotor raptor was up next after following it into the woods the screen opened up to an absolutely massive T-Rex and then another to cotor raptor appeared this one had a very stylish hairdo from what I could gather this T-Rex was dying and these guys were waiting around like vultures ready to pick the carcass clean and that's when the real T-Rex appeared who then scared off the raptors okay now guys brace yourselves it's about to get emotional so I didn't know if this T-Rex was also wanting to eat the bigger T-Rex but then I realized that wait that must be its mother now I don't really know how long T-Rex raised their young foe and at the end of the day it's a show and it's obvious they wanted to hit this emotional beat but that aside I think this scene really worked for me there wasn't any overly dramatic sad music playing in the background it just sort of played out in silence which isn't something we normally get with dinosaur media I feel you don't allow a scene to breathe and this one actually let it slowly unfold in front of you it wasn't rushed it wasn't boring it felt real and at this very emotional moment I did the only logical thing and took a selfie after the T-Rex passed away the to cotor raptors reappeared smelling death I assume one quick tussle with the T-Rex later and they finally got their dindins they did this really cool effect to show the T-Rex decomposition here and after that roller coaster of emotion we had a little play with the baby triceratops in the water oh is it that nice psych now the baby's in danger see you can never really predict where the show's going to go not wanting to be left out the T-Rex breaks up the squabbling decoder raptors and asserts its dominance and of course we get a very Jurassic Park-esque roar from it only thing missing is that banner that falls down in front of it saying dinosaurs rule the earth and then this happened right at this moment I was transported back to the time when I was a kid making edgy dinosaur music videos on youtube so I was warned that the T-Rex might nibble at you which I was preparing myself for however the cameraman wasn't and didn't show any interest to me I was ignored by T-Rex Senpai and if you thought the show didn't have anything else how does an adult triceratop sound oh but wait I forgot we still have the T-Rex to showcase and what better way to end it with a final battle between the triceratops and a T-Rex there were parts of the fight that were done in slow motion the music slowed down the lights changed and even the baby triceratops had its chance to shine and then the stage broke out in what felt like a battle royal and unfortunately I can't spoil the ending to the show but they did have a casting call at the end with all the dinosaurs in the cast which was quite cute and in the end T-Rex Senpai actually did notice me oh and we got to see the T-Rex come back to life so that the children don't have to take any emotional baggage home with them which is nice that was it the whole show and what a roller coaster that was we're at emotional moments with the T-Rex but then all of a sudden it broke out until I would seem to be a dino disco where T-Rex got the show basically what everyone had came here for T-Rex but wait there's more I was allowed to interview one of the CEOs behind the project Karamaru-san who I like to call Japan's John Hammond so we've just watched the the show it was amazing and is it okay if I just ask you a few questions about it thank you how did the idea for the show come about before it came about and that's when it all started that was the reason why I wanted to invite people to the museum well that movie had an impact on the Jurassic Park and that was the reason why I wanted to invite people to the museum I was working at the museum and at the time I was working at the Jurassic Park so I was wondering how many people would come to the museum if the dinosaurs walked out of the museum I also love the Jurassic Park second question how many people does it take to bring a production something like this to life with all the dinosaurs that are in the show I've seen there's like flying ones and even jellyfish I was wondering what was the most complex dinosaur to bring to the show three years oh so would you say that that was the most complicated wow okay apart from the brankis or neck going haywire it took taken three years what other obstacles did you encounter while making this production one thing I wanted to know is this runs for a month about this this show and I was wondering what happens to the dinosaurs when they're not performing on stage do they just get taken to storage or do they go on tour like what happens there so uh do kind of morrisan appreciated my attempt at japanese okay so they're like hide out for events and stuff oh okay you know what do you think of the character John Hammond in that movie would he bring dinosaurs back to life you have you ever tried to or if you could or take control of one of these dinosaurs have you ever done that I can oh which one it's been inside it yeah just now as our knowledge of dinosaur grows and we make new scientific discoveries how important is that to bring them to your show here I was having so much fun talking to another dinosaur enthusiast that I forgot to ask him what goes into choosing the dinosaurs that appear into the show so I had to be reminded to ask him the question if you could choose a dinosaur to be in the show which dinosaur would it be what are the plans for the future of the show where do you see it going from here do you see this going abroad would you take dinosaurs on vacation for example package well hopefully that happens I hope I hope it does well thank you for your time and I hope the next show is just as good as this one thank you so because this was my first proper project recording here in Japan I didn't record an outro so we're going to do one now so first off I just want to say a massive thank you to Kanamura san his passion for dinosaurs was infectious and he was an absolute joy to interview and I want to say thank you as well to the rest of the Dino Alive team for allowing us to basically have the entire stage to ourselves and allow us to get some amazing shots which I'm sure you've seen in the video of course this was my first ever dinosaur live show and it was one hell of a one to start with it was entertaining it had a bit of emotion it had of course dinosaur fights which is what we like to do with the channel of course and I had such a good time there's a lot of things I couldn't record because they weren't set up at the time when we went to record it but outside of the vicinity they've got like stalls set up where you can dig for dinosaurs a lot of things for kids as well as like a huge amount of merchandise I've seen the videos and stuff afterwards and there's a lot if there's something dinosaur related you're probably going to find it there and they even gave me this which is very generous of them which is the Dino Alive 2022 crew which you cannot buy and you can only get it if you worked on the show unless you're especially like me so I really appreciate it thank you guys that was really nice of you and hopefully in the future I can bring you more content like this because I had a blast recording this and until next time I'll see you cuties later Oh buh bye Hello everyone Sorry I was talking No it's fine You tell me when Okay three two one Three Hello everyone Okay wait I thought you wanted me to say it Okay maybe Two two three two Okay okay


Hey, this is Brett, and this 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS with the RS package is stock number 13968Z. I am here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, you're new and used sports car headquarters. This 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS has the 6.2 liter V8 gas engine. It's paired up with the 6 speed automatic transmission and it puts out 400 horsepower exactly. This car has been fully safety and inspected by our service shop per the state of Wisconsin inspection process that has a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off and this car is 100% ready to go. I'm going to go all the way around in this video inside, start it up, take a look under the hood, show you the trunk, give you the most accurate representation that I can of the car. Blu-ray metallic is the color, I shoot all my videos in 4K, and if you like the video you can subscribe to my YouTube channel which is youtube.com slash summit auto, click the bell notification to get updates on the videos I do each and every day as well as having access to one of the largest catalogs of vehicle walkarounds and sports cars on YouTube, 8,000 videos and counting. This one comes with the 20 inch polished aluminum wheels, the Brembo brakes and Pirelli P0 245 45 ZR20 tires, these tires have right around 50 to 60% of the tread left, more like 60% on there so good tread left on those tires. Front fender is in fantastic condition, I didn't see any major dents or dings on there, this one does have the HID headlamps, the LED running lights and the factory fog lights. Front bumper and lower valence area are in excellent condition, I didn't see any major scuffs or scrapes or cracks and the hood is in really nice condition as well, didn't see any major dents or dings on there. Passengers side front fender is in nice shape as well and the passenger side front wheel no major scuffs or scrapes on there. Blu-ray metallic one of my favorite colors on the Camaros has got a lot of metal flake to it, you can see it's got some purples and greens and teals in that metal flake so really a cool color. As you go down this side of this 2014 Chevrolet Camaro Take Notepad clean that body is how reflective and mirror like that paint is. I take these HD videos so if you're far away or even if you're close by and you just cannot make the trip down but you're still interested in purchasing the vehicle you can see the car hear the car and have confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here so when you do get here there's absolutely no surprises. You can make a smart decision to make a purchase or come and see the car from the video and if this video helps you make that decision let your salesman know that you saw the video was helpful and that Brett sent you. Back wheel is in excellent condition as well no scuffs or scrapes and the back tires have right around the same amount tread as the front tires from what you can see back here it's pretty nice under there for a 2014 coming around to the back of the vehicle rear bumper is in excellent shape it does have the backup parking sensors it does also have the Borla exhaust with the nice exhaust tips on there Borla is one of my favorite exhausts we're gonna start it up in just a minute so you can hear that running the trunk lid is in excellent shape as well didn't see any dents or dings you get the LED tail lamps which look really good so it does come with a car cover and if you ever wanted to know where your RPO codes are they're right back here so feel free to pause this make sure that this one's got all the options that you're looking for but nice and clean back there shocks are doing a nice job holding that trunk lid up that shuts nice and solidly coming around the driver's side just as clean as that passenger side I didn't see any dents or dings on the rear quarter and for full disclosure this back wheel just as nice as the rest no scuffs or scrapes on there and down the rest of the side of the car door looks really good does have the heated power mirrors inside the 2SS package gives you the black leather bucket seats there are no rips there are no tears on these seats they are in fantastic condition you get the SS stitched into the headrest the bolsters all look really good power driver seat and passenger seat and heated seats in front auto head lamps factory format Boston premium sound power windows locks and mirrors you do get this silver metallic finish on the door which is pretty cool and then that wraps around onto the dash which is pretty neat as well let's take a quick look at the back seats they are just as clean as front seats no rips or tears back there and it does have the latch child safety system carpeting looks good back there we'll hop inside check out the miles the radio and everything that this one has to offer and then what we'll do is we'll actually go behind the car start it up and we'll remote start it so you can hear it start up 10,770 miles on this one digital speedometer compass display instrument cluster is very nice and clean comes with the leather wrap steering wheel bluetooth and audio controls on the right cruise controls on the left and paddle shifters on the back of the steering wheel you do get the SS emblem right there this one comes with the Chevy my links system does have the factory navigation system there's highway 41 so that is working nicely get AM FM and Sirius XM radio capabilities on here and then you get all these different apps as well and right there and there so a lot of stuff you can do with that radio here your climate controls your heated seat buttons you get an oil pressure oil temp volts and trans temp gauge right there stability control six-speed automatic transmission passenger side floor mat and seat are in fantastic conditional rips or tears on that passenger seat and the headliner is in nice shape and it does come with the power sunroof up here you get home link buttons for garage door security systems and lane systems map lights sunroof controls and on-starring SOS buttons in that review mirror review mirror is in nice condition sometimes these can delaminate and such alright let's go remote start it and then we'll take a look under the hood after that so I'm gonna lock it and I'm just gonna press and hold the remote start like I said I really like the Borla exhaust sounds really good like those LED tail lamps as well so now I have to put the key back in and turn the ignition on so I can open the hood as if I would open the hood right now it would shut the car off but we'll start it up here so now it's officially started you can see there's no check engine lights or anything like that and now I can open the hood I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today and hopefully from this HD video you've been able to verify the quality condition options and of course cleanliness of this car all the way around inside now you can see those lights are all working very nicely under the hood we have the 6.2 liter v8 gas engine 400 horsepower when paired up the automatic transmission this car has been fully safety dead and inspected by our service shop has a fresh oil and filter change all the fluids have been checked and topped off does have a cold air intake shock tower brace on there as well and this car is 100% ready to go there's the emissions sticker shock is doing a really nice job holding that hood up and that heat extraction is functional and I would highly recommend this car from a quality and condition standpoint and to see more pictures of this car one of our other 550 new and used cars trucks SUVs minivans Wranglers sports cars Camaro's Challengers Chargers Corvettes Mustangs GT500 ZL1s Hellcats you name it we got to go to that website right there is summitauto.com full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle all at summitauto.com and if you'd like to check out more HD videos you can go to youtube.com slash summit auto click the bell notification to get updates on the videos I do each and every day as well as having access to one of the largest catalogs of vehicle and sports car walk-arounds on YouTube in fact in a second you will see a link to subscribe my YouTube channel the upper left a link to more Camaro videos are done in the upper right link to this vehicle on our website in the lower left and a link to one of our latest YouTube videos in the lower right click those check us out we're super excited to help you with this ultra plane 2014 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS RS package in blu-ray metallic thanks again for checking out the video remember to like subscribe and share on the YouTube channel I really appreciate it thanks again