Coming up on this episode of Encounter TV.  Yet Christians don't preach it. It's the potential to change everything. For centuries, tyrants and governments and kings and wicked men and women have tried to... You're watching Encounter TV, featuring the evangelistic healing ministry of David Diga Hernandez. David is taking the saving and healing power of God to this generation and the nations of the world. A generation is being inspired. You'll encounter the Holy Spirit's presence, God's healing power, the truth of the Word, the love of Christ, and freedom through the miraculous. You're watching Encounter TV. Hello, I'm David Diga Hernandez and you are watching Encounter TV. The scripture says in Luke chapter 4 verse 18, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim that captives will be released, that the blind will see, that the oppressed will be set free, and that the time of the Lord's favor has come. On this edition of Encounter TV, I'm talking to you about the true power of God The true power of God is the gospel of Jesus Christ.  And I believe today that as you hear this message, it's going to stir your faith. I'm preaching a message today called the true power of God, and it is about the gospel of Jesus Christ. And I preach this message at the Carson Civic Center in Carson, California. We're going to show you the footage of this message in just a moment. And then at the end of the program, we're going to show you footage from that same event where the power of the Holy Spirit moved in a tremendous way. I want you to experience the presence and the power of the Holy Spirit like never before. And I believe that as you watch this message and as you watch how the Holy Spirit moved at the end of the service that we're going to show you, that you will experience the power and the presence of the Holy Spirit. Again, I'm talking today about the true power of God, which is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Let's go now to Carson, California, where I'm ministering this message. Watch this. What is the power? Is the power the Holy Spirit? No, he's a person. A person can have power, but a person can't be power. Is the power the miracles that you may see here tonight? Is the power when someone comes out of a wheelchair and when they're healed? I think about this all the time. I'm in the healing ministry, but I don't emphasize healing. I emphasize Jesus. I emphasize Christ. Is the power when people come to the front? They begin to tremble and they're slain under the power of the Holy Spirit? Not necessarily. It's an effect of the power, but it's not the power. Is the power when I worship really loud and pray in tongues really loud? No, because noise does not equal power. You can be as loud as you want if you're not living holy and you're not living a lifestyle of prayer. It's just volume. It's just noise. What is the power of God? What is the power that advances the kingdom? What is the power that overtakes nations? What is this power that overtook Rome? What is this power that moves throughout the earth as a force that affects change and transforms things everywhere it goes? Romans chapter 1 verse 16. For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ. For it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believe it. The gospel is the power of God. The gospel and the power of God are attached to each other. Look at this verse in Mark chapter 1 verse 14 through 15. This is after Jesus' baptism and before he selects his disciples. It says this, After John had been taken into custody Jesus came into Galilee preaching the gospel of God and saying the time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe in the gospel. His first message that he began to preach was that the kingdom of God was now. It was here. It was among you. It was within you. And therefore it's now time to repent of your sins and believe the good news about what he did on the cross. This is what the Bible teaches. The power of God is the gospel. For centuries, tyrants and governments and kings and wicked men and women have tried to silence the gospel. They've tried through persecution to silence the gospel. They've tried through political pressure to silence the gospel. They've tried through social pressure to silence the gospel. But you cannot stop the power of God. The power of God moves throughout the earth through all these centuries despite what men and women have tried to do. And it's still affecting lives today. You have the kingdom in you. You have the power of God. You have the gospel of Jesus Christ. Everywhere we go, the gospel should be preached. Everywhere we go, we're taking dominion. Why? Because we carry the gospel message with us. The scripture equates the gospel message or identifies the gospel message with your feet. Why? Because Jesus said go. Ephesians chapter 6 verse 15 which is in reference to the armor that we should take up for spiritual warfare. It says, And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace. Romans chapter 10 verse 14 says this, But how can they call on him to save them unless they believe in him? And how can they believe in him if they have never heard about him? And how can they hear about him unless someone tells them? And how will anyone go and tell them without being sent? This is why the scripture says how beautiful are the feet of the messengers who bring good news. Matthew chapter 10 verse 14 when someone rejects the gospel. What does it tell you? Does it say stop talking? Does it equate it with your mouth? No, what does it say? If any household or town refuses to welcome or listen to your message, shake its dust from your feet as you leave. The gospel is powerful. There is nobody more capable of changing the world than the one who goes with the gospel. That's not rhetoric. That's not cliche. That's truth.  You have the power to change the world. You have the power to affect change. It is the gospel of Jesus Christ that transforms everything it touches. In fact, the gospel is so powerful that it maintains its power even when hypocrites preach it. Philippians chapter 1 verse 18. But that doesn't matter whether they're motives are false or genuine. The message about Christ is being preached either way. So I rejoice and I will continue to rejoice. Or think of those in Matthew 7. Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy on your name? He doesn't deny that they did good works. He denies that he knew them.  Yet Christians don't preach it. It's the potential to change everything. Now, you can have the gospel and there may be power on it. That's true even if it's a hypocrite that preaches it. But this also means that even if you're a Christian who preaches, if it's not the gospel, there's no power. We've become so distracted with so many other messages and then we wonder why we're having trouble transforming our cities, our regions, the world or lives. The enemy knows the power of the gospel. Even Satan knows. He can't remove the power from the gospel. But he can remove the gospel from your mouth. Church, if we don't preach the gospel, nobody will. It has been entrusted to us to declare this message. I've heard it said and you've heard it said. Preach the gospel and when necessary use words.  You know who says that, people who are ashamed of the name of Jesus and who are afraid to be identified as extreme or radical. You can identify me as an extremist. I am an extremist. I believe there's only one way to heaven. There's no other way to heaven. His name is Jesus. Still to come on this edition of EncounterTV. We're going to go back to Carson, California in just a moment where I'll be finishing that message on the true power of God. But now it's time for our Mark 16 miracle segment. This is the segment where I take your footage of you praying for the sick, prophesying, evangelizing, capturing it on footage and sending it into us. And I believe that every believer is to move out in the power of the Holy Spirit in this way. So what you're about to see is footage of someone who sent in the footage to us and they prayed for the sick and I want you to watch this. I want you to be encouraged. And then again, we're going to come back and we're going to go to Carson, California where I'll be finishing that message on the true power of God. I want you to watch this. She has no eardrums and we prayed twice already. We just now prayed twice. She has some hearing aids, but she has no eardrums. She's completely deaf since age six. Right now we pray twice the second time. Her left ear opened up and she can start hearing. Can you hear in your left ear? I could hear it before, but I couldn't hear it before. You did it three times. I did it, okay. You can hear my finger snapping? That's true. Okay, God just opened up her left ear. We're going to keep praying for her right ear. Father in Jesus' name, Father we speak a complete new eardrum in her right ear. Father, we're praying for a creative miracle right now in Jesus' name. Create her right eardrum right now in Jesus' name with all power and authority in Jesus Christ, in all power and authority and faith in Jesus Christ. You can hear me talking. In Jesus' name, and both of your pieces are out. That is weird. Create this Father right now in Jesus' name, complete this miracle, Lord. In Jesus' name, I speak this right now into her with all power and authority in your name, Jesus, not mine but yours. Your power, Father, in Jesus' name, create this eardrum in the right, Father. Amen. Nothing over here? But you can hear, Father. Open this up more, Father. In Jesus' name, completely. 100% open up this ear. In Jesus' name, open up this eardrum, Father. Letter here. 100% Father, not 50, not 60, not 70. 100% letter here. In Jesus' name, open up in here. How much can you hear? That is awesome. How much is back? Amen. God bless you, man. It's by no accident you guys came up on this call just to talk to us. God is good. And God can do the same with you. Here's my challenge to you now. I want you to get outside the four walls of the church. Prophecy. Pray for the sick. Evangelize. Capture it on footage. Send it in to us. At the end of the program, I'm going to give you some general contact information. And you can use that general contact information to submit your video. We're going to go back to Carson, California now where I'm talking about the true power of God. Remember, everywhere the gospel goes, there is transformation. Everywhere the gospel goes, there is breakthrough. I want to encourage you today that as you hear this message, and as your faith is stirred, that you would go and say, Lord, I want you to send me. I want to be a conduit for your power. I want to be one who declares the gospel of Jesus Christ. Let's go now to Carson, California where I'm finishing up this message. Scripture says in March, chapter 16, verse 20, and they went forth and preached everywhere the Lord working with them and confirming the word with signs following. Everything that God does, miracles, salvation, transformation, even financial blessing, he'll do for the sake of the gospel. If you're not seeing miracles, it's time to start preaching the gospel. If there's no power when you speak, it's time to start preaching the gospel. Acts chapter 1, verse 8 tells us that we'll receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on us. Why? To be witnesses of what? The gospel. Luke chapter 4, verse 18 says that Jesus was anointed, that the Spirit was upon him because he had been anointed to preach the gospel. The gospel is a spiritual message and the church is getting away from that. Pastors, get back to the gospel. Believer, get back to the gospel.  Let me ask you a question. When is it a good idea to only preach a part of the gospel? Especially when no one is promised tomorrow, the problem with saying I'm going to slowly lure them in and little by little tell them the message is that it doesn't account for the unpredictability of death. There's no urgency to preach when you think that way. There is no time to preach the gospel. Someone asked me, do you believe these are the last days? I don't know if we're living in the last days, but I know for certain that today is somebody's last day and that's enough to cause me to preach the gospel with urgency. The gospel is the power of God. Church, we need to stop being a referral program. Go see the psychiatrist. Go see the doctor. You have to counsel him for hours because you don't know how to cast out devils.  He confirms his word. God so values his word. God holds his word in high esteem that when it is preached, he will come himself and prove that it's his word. People look for proof. Jesus said, I'll come to you myself. That's the difference between what we believe and all the other false beliefs that people have about God. It's that Jesus himself promised I will come to them myself, but why? Because the gospel is being preached. Church, we need to get back to the gospel. Everywhere the gospel goes, it expands the kingdom of God. You want to be kingdom and power. Preach the gospel. It's simple. It's simple. If it was difficult, we would mess that up. God made it so simple and we still mess it up. Preach the gospel. The gospel is God's offer of peace to mankind. The gospel is God's extravagant mercy demonstrated for all to see. The gospel is man's bridge to his creator. The gospel is heaven's gift, the church's power, the world's hope, and hell's defeat. The gospel is the power of God. Church, get back to the gospel. I truly believe that if we can focus with urgency preaching on the gospel, preaching this message with conviction and faith that we will again see book of acts power. Why not now? God do in the modern church what you did in the book of acts. To the hopeless, the gospel is hope. To those who are stained by sin, the gospel is forgiveness. A dying world, the gospel is the cure. To the blind, the gospel is sight. To those who are bound by darkness, the gospel is the light of truth. Some of you were drug addicted and then you heard the gospel. Some of you were on the verge of divorce and then you heard the gospel. Some of you were on the verge of suicide and then you heard the gospel. Some of you were burdened with your sin but then you heard the gospel. You were bound by fear, weighed down by depression, overwhelmed with confusion. Some of you were religious and full of pride but then you heard the gospel. Let me tell you something. The world is desperately searching for this purpose. They're longing for this hope. They're wondering if they have any value but they're going to hear the gospel and you and I, you and I have been empowered by the Holy Spirit to carry this message. Self-help is okay. Pastor's 10-point sermons on a better family, better marriage, better finances, that's okay. We're called to preach the gospel. We're called to preach Christ and Inclusion. I'm believing for a move of God and so if God's speaking to you, I want you to stand your feet. Lift your hands, close your eyes. The presence of the Holy Spirit is here. The presence of the Holy Spirit is here. Explode this place. I believe the power of God has hit this building. Many of you are about to be healed right now. Many of you are about to be set free right now from things that have plagued you for years. A single moment spent in God's presence can transform your life. Lord, I release the anointing of the Holy Ghost on you right now. You want to make the devil really mad? Come on, pick those legs up and down for me right now. Cast all your cares upon him for he cares for you. Lord Jesus, pass over him. In the name of Jesus, abide all sickness, all pain, let the healing power of God flow. Be made whole right now, right now, right now in Jesus' name. You don't have any feeling in your foot. How about in your leg now? Is it coming back? You're sensing it coming back. He's sensing feeling coming back to his leg right now. Jesus makes you whole. Jesus makes you whole. I believe the anointing of the Holy Spirit is flowing right now. You're watching this. You heard the word concerning the gospel of Jesus Christ. You heard about the power of the gospel. And then you saw what the Holy Spirit did in Southern California. I love the presence and the power of the Holy Spirit. And I believe right now, as you're watching, that God's power, the Holy Spirit's presence can meet you right where you are. Whatever your need, our God is able. This gospel that is being preached comes with benefits. There is power on the proclamation of the word of God. And I believe right now I can feel the anointing of the Holy Spirit flowing. Let's pray and let's ask God to touch your life. Let's ask God to fill you with a fresh empowering of the Holy Spirit. Father, in Jesus' name, come on, in faith, I want you to stretch your hands toward mine. Lord, I pray for that one watching me right now who is looking to experience your touch, who wants your presence, wants your power.  And I pray, Father, in the name of Jesus, that that one watching would be empowered. That one watching would be transformed right now.  And you've been doubting and you've been asking the Lord, you said, Lord, I want you to confirm to me that I'm called to preach your gospel. Here's your confirmation. You're called to preach the gospel. Lord, I thank you for your power flowing. Father, I pray not only for a fresh touch, not only for the empowering of the Holy Spirit, but Jesus that you would make that one watching who's believing for a healing completely whole. Lord, I pray with boldness that not one person watching would walk away from this broadcast the same. I rebuke all sickness right now. The power of your word, Lord, breaks the power of sickness. I speak against cancer right now in Jesus' name. I pray for those suffering with blood disorders, heart disease in Jesus' name. Somebody watching me right now, you've had severe arthritis for several years and it's all throughout your body.  Lord, I thank you in Jesus' name. Somebody watching right now with a severe back issue, you've just been healed in Jesus' name. I thank you, Lord. The power of God is moving and I really do believe that you'll never be the same. There is power in the gospel of Jesus Christ. That is it for this edition of EncounterTV. I'm David D. Guernanis and remember until next time, nothing is impossible with God. Thank you for watching EncounterTV. To connect with me and this ministry, visit EncounterTV.com. There you can watch full episodes of EncounterTV on demand, submit videos of you ministering on the streets for our Mark 16 Miracle segment and see upcoming ministry events in your area. Also, don't forget to download our ministry app by searching my name, David D. Guernanis in the Apple or Google store. Thank you again for watching EncounterTV. God bless.


And moving on to other parts of Africa, Togolese President Foreigner Singh Bey has welcomed Mali's request for mediation. Togolese Foreign Minister Robert Dosey, who confirmed this, said that the president and his government are ready to facilitate a fruitful dialogue between Mali and the international community. Mali's Foreign Minister, Abdelai Diop, conveyed President Colonel Assimi Goyt's request during its today's visit to Lome. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.


Okay, so look I'm just gonna go from the top to the bottom honestly say what I think about everything and and the implication I think for for PvP. I'll you know what I'm gonna do as well Where is it I'll do this quickly now for anyone that missed it So I'm only gonna do one rogue spec because everyone's just playing asset with sub anyway So this is kind of where we're at the moment Warrior is high because this is like a like most people are doing blood moon and Beesies right now, right? So there's a lot of group combat. The reason warriors are high is because they Absorb a lot of damage. They have a lot of mobility. They have a lot of CC with the stuns. They can get around quickly They can interrupt stop casts They can get out again without dying they can put up more strikes So their utility is really high on top of that They have commanding shack which gives a lot of health to the whole team So yeah warriors high B wire rats and bees pretty much same logic as warrior just they're tankier due to bubble hodge They have general more kill potential than warrior does Enhance is probably a bit higher than BM, but generally enhance lacks mobility But they're very tanky and they do good damage. So I think I'm gonna put it like that That's that's kind of how we were where we're thinking things are at the moment That's drove left to cast it's got again good damage fire mage can do a lot of good instant damage Just a we with living bomb living flame these kind of things and if they can cast they could do good single target, too What's the second S tier spec boomie? So yeah, this is kind of where the tier list was before So this is the changes. So literally I made a tier list in the later in the day. They did changes So unlucky. I'm gonna have to do a new tier list But life bloom mana cross reduced by 50% life bloom refunds half of its new mana base When it expires it would as well. This is pretty big Gonna be interesting to see how Like whether or not life bloom healing can actually keep up with the damage in the current meta You might see more rest of Druids now rather than just straight up moonkins with wild growth But I don't know if life bloom actually heals enough. Yeah, I don't know if there's enough plus healing enough in the game yet for life bloom to To keep people alive. We'll have to see maybe it's maybe it's good if it if life bloom can actually keep people up then this is gonna be really efficient healing for druids and You know arguably They're gonna be decent life in heels for 64 per tick at three stacks Yeah, it's not a lot It's not a lot. This is what I mean, right? Like I don't know if life bloom is gonna be enough Maybe life bloom with rejuvened wild growth.  Yeah, that's that's awkward So this I think looks more appealing than actually is Living seed now heals for 50% of the critical healed that planted The seed was 30% the heal now blooms from non-period healing received in addition to any damage taken That's just freaking weird man. I don't I even know what that means honestly.  So you'll be taking nourish if you're healing I guess if you're playing boomy then you want to clips Increases the crit effect chance of your regrowth spell by 10% So like if you want to get a living seed you press for growth, right for sure So regrowth might be decent if you go like full full resto spec with swift mend I think we'll we'll see I think with these changes. We will see more resto druids rather than just like balanced druids with living What's it? What's it face the the aoe heal? I think druids probably still not as good as discs, but definitely moving up the ranks I think they need more bonus healing overall to kind of get to that break point where their hots are A problem mookins can now cast non-healing resto spells without canceling their shape shift This includes remove curse remove poison Abolish poison innovate rebirth revive mark the world gift of the world give that to shadow form that'd be nice I want fucking abolish disease from shadow form, but To be honest, I shouldn't really be asking things and I didn't show it right now Shadows in a great spot fear of storm rage improved when this room makes healing touch instant It now makes it castable in all shape shift forms. Wow. So I mean you can just play straight out moonkin now Then a what and then just like Send out some healing touches the issue with this is it's it still costs a lot of mana, right? So moonkins are gonna go oom like the the proc doesn't make the healing touch free It just makes it instant so overall quite interesting changes for druids. They reduced moonfire mana usage Wait, where's that? Is I not documented on here or what or is that? Elsewhere I skipped a line. Wait, which line did I skip? Oh Here we go moon can form now also reduces mana cost of moonfire and increases moon fire by a periodic damage by 50% Sunfire also benefits from the change. Wow That's crazy That's like really good change for druid for PvE as well. So you want to be dispelling those dots now That's really strong. I can't even miss that. That's nuts That's probably the best change out of all of them I mean the insane thing is druid was still s tier like right now So like moonkin is gonna be really really really strong, but it's just not gonna be played I guess and I mean what what do what can they take instead of a wild growth? Let me see not a lot, right? Oh, Sunfire So they're gonna be playing Sunfire more instead of wild growth I'd say all the wild growth is still really strong So I don't know if you're gonna actually see them replacing that in in group PvP or not I think there's more value still coming from the wild growth button push Overall though is moonkin buffs, but it's more pure moonkin I think the main issue with moonkin right now is like eclipse is too good in that it makes Too much like too much benefits off the same stuff, right?  It's like, okay. Yeah, you need to prep it a little bit with some casts But I think that's the thing that's making moonkin really really strong right now If they if they smoothened that out this change would be like pretty nice And it would make more like of an equal power over the kit, which would be cool But overall, yeah, I mean, I don't think there's any objectively bad changes there like the the the areas that they're targeting are I agree with I think they're good areas to target right there buffing baseline spells To try to compete more with with runes to a degree Lifeline was kind of trash. I think it still doesn't heal for enough But we'll see hunter door with specialization at no longer grants a 30% damage bonus to raptor strike For wielding two weapons of the same time.  So I mean rats can do even more damage than that's kind of scary Seal of martyrdom can no longer trigger out of war and will no longer be triggered by frost oil or other weapon procs So small nerf there I guess but yeah, this is this is scary man Okay rogue redirect no longer triggers or is affected by the global cooldown and It's own cooldown has been reduced to 10 seconds When redirect is combined in a macro with other combo point related abilities It often does not function as expected. We recommend not including in such macros, right? Okay main gouch Now generates three combo points on your target and base energy cost reduced to 15 So they basically buffed this is like the dot equivalent at the dot equivalent of mutilate, right? So it's just gaining some DPS. I don't know if this is gonna make it go ahead of mutilate or what? But it's an option at least just a flesh wound threat bonus increased such that rogue tanks will Generate approximately 30% more threat. Okay, nothing that really affects PvP there. I would say shaman 200 mastery rune now also provides 10% increased attack power and 10% increased chance to hit with spells after Hitting a target with two-handed weapon. So just they just really want more 200 stuff going on, right? Shamrage now grants 5% of the shamans max mana per second instead of a value scaling from okay, so it's just cleaning out basically I mean, that's fine Spirit of the alpha rune now grants the casting show Target other than self wait, what a spirit the alpha dude.  Yeah, but like can't you put it on someone in PvP? Oh freedom totem is the the option. Ah, yeah, okay I see that's not a not a terrible idea than to put it on that Smart thinking by whoever was designing shaman. I'm not sure about this one People I mean, I feel like people are still not gonna use two-hand mastery at 200 weapons if you this is a big one Urfium mana cost reduced by 67% and charges increase from 3 to 9 I wonder if you can dispel the whole stack in one go. Does anyone know?  Okay, it's fine. Let's find I mean, and it's still is most likely still gonna be a good trade for the shaman I think the baseman here tonight, so it's basically healing for 50% more Has more charges costs One-third of the manner like that's a crazy buff and on top of that It's like got some dodgy anti-push back I think if they if they get riptied and they have this it's gonna be a unreal power surge tool tip revised Clarify functionality this rune periodically grants mana every five seconds equal to 15% of the shamans intellect some potential issues Time sorry timing issues that have sometimes made it give it less mana than it ended up in fixed, okay? Contestral guidance cool and reduced to one minute was two minutes So that's the one where when you heal the pump someone right dude We're not getting prospect protection of shadow till next phase man. Can I link it? Yeah? It's on the first page of wow head man. I think overall not bad thing not bad change I don't know how much this actually affects the tier list, you know I think it I think it'll bring boomy above shadow probably I mean the enhanced stuff is kind of PvE, right? Like this doesn't really matter in PvP. This is kind of a side change this they won't use because of freedom tome This is kind of nice, but I think enhance is still gonna use way This is Nice for Ellie, but doesn't change that much It's like a bit of manner I guess and then this is kind of whatever for rest though slash Ellie slash whatever the fuck use this So I don't think this changes shaman that much or enhance that much Rogue is PvE Paladin is maybe gonna gain a bit of burst like Paladin might do this Actually We'll have to see but I think I think rats might be quite quite scary like this is potentially gonna hit really hard How do we get push back protection next phase? Because we get 10 more points, right?  I think it's enough. I think Hunter is actually gonna do this. I Think you might see something like this happen next phase This is all this is predictions by the way This isn't how I'll put it back to what I think it is in the moment before the changes spear And I think rest I drew it is coming up potentially on par with this priest Maybe a little bit worse I don't have it on this tier with lists at the moment warrior probably gonna go up with the arm and I've wait what arm enough Oh, is that PV? Yeah, there's we're talking PVP. This isn't PV You scared me, bro. I was like, oh my god. They nerfing armor. So this is what we're at at the moment So it's weird like there's some specs in the love down here. They haven't really seen much I think Frost definitely desperately needs some PvP love boo me potentially up survival probably down Ret probably up. That's about it. Rest over droid probably up Rogue irrelevant shaman mostly looks irrelevant other than the earth shield I think rest of shamans might gain a bit. Do I think survival hunter is over BM and PV Yeah, the pet is too easy to kill for a five-man group It's like remotely coordinated and then once the pet is dead the BM hunter is kind of useless Why do I think Ellie is so good?  All right if flame shot was like 36 yards it would be like this Right So that this is the thing that's bringing it down a bit. They have insane utility. They're really tanky. They have off heels They have good mobility due to the ghost wolf being able to kite away if they need to And yeah, you basically have to lock them down.  This is stv event and bg's Generally, I'm leaving duals a little bit less out of mind for the tier list because one I haven't done that many duals and Two I think that people more people aren't doing duals at them as much at the moment, right?  But I Think if you're like playing front to back Against another group Ellie is is good if you bring like a moonkin and Ellie a shadow priest and then like a warrior or a rogue to like defend and then And then like a disc priest to heal then you've got like the shadow priest off healing you got the Ellie off healing You have the boomy a technically off healing and then the disc spot healing as an example And I think the Ellie fits really nicely and so that if Ellie can use earth shields instead of way It could be really scary They could get a lot of love Lot of costs off. Did you miss the Taylor's breakdown? Yes, you did I'm just gonna feed my cat and then we're gonna do a couple more bg's getting up a beer have a chill put on some bangers and Yeah, we'll do that for like an hour


We're all proud of a strong dollar, and it helps to keep inflation down, as you noted last night. But there is such a thing as the dollar being too strong, at least for certain industries and exports and so forth. Are you worried now that we've really reached the point, given the escalation of the dollar in recent weeks, that the dollar really is overvalued now? Well, what I'm more concerned about is that, of course, it's overvalued if you compare it to other currencies, but I think where we should be looking are to those other currencies. And obviously, our recovery is way ahead of theirs, and obviously they're still burdened by some rigidities in their ways of doing business and so forth that I think are going to have to be corrected, and what we're hopeful of is an increase in the value of theirs. I think the danger of trying artificially in some way to force the value of our dollar down puts you back, as I said last night, in the inflation spiral. But we did intervene a little while ago, too. Yes, and we've done that from time to time, where we think there's disorder threatening the marketplace, and so that has been done. That could be done again. Yes, yeah. But not primarily to drive the dollar down. No. Just to... Do you think that the Federal Reserve should ease monetary policy to allow the dollar to decline? No, I think the Federal Reserve right now is doing what we believe is proper, and that is to see that the money supply and the growth in it is commensurate with the growth in our economy, and so that growth will continue without inflation. Chairman Volcker says that the Fed has stopped easing monetary policy, at least for the time being. How would you respond if interest rates...if the Fed lets interest rates start rising by say the spring? Well, I would not like to see them do something to encourage their rising, and the tendency has been, as you know now, for a period back to drop, and I'd like to see them drop further. And that, too, would help, I think, in the balancing more of the currencies of our trading partners. You'll be going to Bonn in May for the Economic Summit. What do you expect the main issue is going to be there? Well, I think it'll be a continuation of what we've been talking for the last couple of those summits. Some of it will be, I'm sure, a discussion of how we can institute another round of trade talks to come closer to a free market place and get rid of protectionism wherever possible. I think that's as vital to them as it is to us, but again it's going to make them look at some of their own structure and some of their government practices just as we have looked at ours in the last four years and look what the changes have brought us. But the strong dollar is likely to increase protectionist pressures in the United States, isn't it? It might, but it would be the wrong way to go. Are you growing at all impatient with the Japanese government on trade concessions from them? Well, this is the wrong time to ask me that now because we are entered into ongoing discussions with them about making the market open in both directions. And I have to say that Prime Minister Nakasone has been most cooperative, like me. He has a government structure in which he can't just give orders and have things happen. So he'll be running into confrontations about what he wants to do, but I know that he believes very much that as the two economic powers that we are, that there is a risk in the imbalance of trade that we have between us, and we have made some sizable progress with them on trade matters and on the basis of opening their markets or making them more open to our own exports. What do you think is the most substantial concession they've given us? Well I would have to say in agriculture the opening to beef and citrus was very definite. The voluntary restraint that they themselves adopted on their own about automobile imports when that industry was so hard hit here. Are you inclined to have that expire? Well, it's voluntary in their part. And as I say, I'm not ready to discuss that yet, but we'll have to treat with it and deal with it in the context of the ongoing overall talks that we're having with them. Which includes telecommunications and financial services and the whole. I'd like to ask you a domestic question. Just named Barrel Sprinkle to head the CEA. I'd like to know what your thinking was. Why did you choose a rigid monitorist, especially since Mr. Sprinkle has been a very harsh critic of Fed policy. So doesn't this move raise the specter of some renewed turbulence between the White House and the Central Bank? Well no, I don't think so. He's taking a position to be my economic advisor. And I think that's what his function will be. On the other hand, I've had criticisms of past performance when the money supply has either gone one way or the other or held, for example, too tightly for a time. And I've been willing to speak my mind on that. I recognize at the same time, however, that the tools the Fed has to work with are not very accurate. I mean they're not that precise and you can't look at the fluctuations, you have to look at a kind of a long-term trend in which way they're going and, as I say, I'm satisfied with what they're doing. Well, there's still a question of why a supply side president would have a monitorist CEA chairman and a follow-up. Do you want to change the role of the CEA in any way from the Feldstein era? Well I won't discuss it with relation to what any other era has been. I'll only say that I want it to be an advisory group to me. I want their advice and I want it given to me. I don't want to just have to read about it someplace. Why a monitorist? Why a monitorist? No, I think that there's a place for that also. On another personnel matter, Ray Donovan has been on leave of absence from the Labor Department since October and it now appears that he faces the prospect of a protracted criminal trial on corruption charges. Isn't it time that the Labor Department had a full-time secretary? I just don't think you can walk away from someone who has been as unjustly treated as he has and I have every confidence in him and I'm not going to do anything that would indicate that I don't. The budget battle was underway on Capitol Hill and the Senate appears to be moving toward adoption of a budget freeze that would include a one-year hold on cost of living adjustments for Social Security recipients. Now, in light of your campaign statements on this subject, will you work to kill that provision? Well, I'm going to see what happens there. I have said on occasion and I don't mean to say this to be taken in any way that I'm retracting or trying to prepare the ground for drawing back. The pledge that I made during the campaign, in my mind, was aimed at repudiating the charges that I was out to reduce the benefits that Social Security recipients received. I frankly had not thought about whether it had anything to do with the increases. Actually, I don't think that's such an important thing. If you look at it honestly, first of all, inflation is so low that that isn't what it has been in the past with double-digit inflation. But the second thing is all this dwelling on Social Security ignores the fact that Social Security is not contributing to the deficit. It is funded by a payroll tax which can only be used for that purpose. And if you lower the cost of Social Security or the outgoal, it just simply reverts to the trust fund. Actually, I don't know why Congress ever put it in a unitary way in the budget and made it unitary with the budget. If ever there was anything that belonged out here on its own, it is that program. In question about taxes, in 1981, you were personally down in the political trenches fighting for your tax bill. The administration's new tax reform proposal has been public since November. And so far, the White House hasn't taken the lead in forming a pro-reform coalition. Why are you hanging back and how do you expect this bill to pass without that kind of personal involvement? We don't and we're going to be that personally involved. What we haven't been able to convince anyone of is the fact that our first requirement was the budget. And there's no way to describe the hours that we have put in in the meetings on that subject alone until we were ready with a budget proposal which we have now submitted to the Congress. But said over and over again that then we go to work because it is a dual track thing that this whole problem of the deficit and government overspending. Now we will do the same thing that we did with the budget. We have not had time or had a single meeting on the Treasury proposal. Now overall, from what I know of the overall view of that proposal, I've said that I think it's the best tax study I've ever seen. But it also contains a number of options and just like the budget when we went over them point by point. We're going to have to look at these and there may be some things that we believe are not wise and that shouldn't be in there. But we're not ready to go to bat with that until we stop talking about the generalization of the plan and come down to specifics and say, all right, here is that proposal and here is how we want it passed. Well, on the plan, you assert that you can slash corporate tax rates and still keep the plan revenue neutral by making companies that currently don't pay taxes start to pay them. But since the Treasury's tax plan raises business taxes by $165 billion over five years, isn't it a little implausible to assume that sums of this magnitude will only be raised by making a few industries pay more taxes? Well, the truth of the matter is the figure is somewhere around $100 billion a year of tax that we believe legitimately should be collected and isn't being paid. Now that wouldn't all be business tax, but it is a sizable amount. There are in addition to the rates being cut, however, remember also that there are going to be changes not only for business but for individuals with regard to cutting off exemptions, but we find that for the individuals, for example, they still come out with a tax rate reduction. We think that in addition there is another thing that we have seen in the past that will happen. We think that this proposal and the lowering of the rates will make the whole business of tax shelters not as attractive. There just won't be the reason to go out searching for them. The final tax question, and I think we'd like to move to foreign policy for a bit. Treasury Secretary Baker says it will be four to six weeks before he decides on whether to draft a specific tax bill or send Congress a general statement of principles or opt to work informally with the Congressional Tax Writing Committees. With that kind of a slower track, aren't you running the risk that Congress will turn to tax reform too late to pass it this year? No, because there's nothing in that that's going to be retroactive. There is another plus, too. We've had an experience of having taxes and budget cuts both at the same time and seeing people on the Hill that then wanted to start trading from one to the other. We didn't want that and don't want it, but it isn't a case of deliberately holding back. What he's going by is our experience with the budget and how long it's going to take us now to sit down and really work out what in what form that Treasury proposal we want to send up there. Mr. President, shifting to foreign affairs and specifically Nicaragua, whether you wanted to or not, you made some news at your recent press conference by suggesting that the U.S. was broadening the political objectives in Nicaragua by keeping the pressure on until the Marxist government there, while it was dissolved, agreed to power sharing with the dissident movements. My question is, how can we justify helping to what appears to be overthrow a government merely because we don't like its political coloration? Well, because here again we always find ourselves, because they call themselves a government accepting that, all right, this is the government of the country and of the people. This is one faction of a revolution that overthrew a dictatorship. And while we weren't around then, this country made it very plain that we had no objection to that overthrow. In fact, we immediately, and this was before my administration came here, this country started to provide sizable financial aid to the revolutionary government. But then it developed that Justice Castro had done in Cuba, as I said last night. One faction got in and muscled the others out. Some of them were jailed, some were driven into exile, some are up there leading the freedom fighters now. And there is the fact of the promise they made to the Organization of American States that in return for their help, this would be a legitimate democracy. I think we have to ignore this pretense of an election that they just held. This is not an elected government. This is a faction of the revolution that is taken over at the point of a gun. And the people haven't had anything to say about it. And I think that under the UN Charter, under the OAS Charter, there's every reason for us to be helping the people that have indicated they want the original goals of the revolution to be instituted. And sir, if you're frustrated by not getting Congress to go along with you on aid to the Contras, we still do a fair amount of trade with Nicaragua. Would you go along with the idea of imposing economic sanctions on Nicaragua? You have the authority to do that without Congress's approval. Well, I'd rather not discuss anything in the line of tactics of what we might or might not do as this continues. Moving then to El Salvador, there's the war there. It seems to be grinding on with no clear victory on either side. How much longer will the United States begin supporting the Duarte government until before something positive seems to be coming out of it? Are you getting impatient with the pace down there? No, and we wish it could be faster than it is, but actually there has been improvement. There has been improvement in this government and in the El Salvador military. They have been making more progress than they have in the past against the guerrillas. And what I'd like to see also happen is Congress join now and support a multi-year imposition of the, well, I call it the Scoop Jackson plan that Commission came back with, aimed not just at a particular country, but aimed at, in the whole area, making those countries more economically sound, more self-sufficient, give them economies that can begin to improve the scale of living of their people. And just as it's with us in the past, we have tried to, our aid has been about three to one social and economic compared to military, and that's the same ratio pertains to this other plan, but the idea of having an extended plan, just as we did with the Caribbean initiative, in which someone doesn't just say, well, they're doing this today, but what are they going to do tomorrow? They can look ahead and plan ahead. I apologize for jumping around the world so much, but moving to the Mideast, partly in response to U.S. pressure, the Israelis have begun their withdrawal from southern Lebanon, and in the ensuing vacuum there, the Shiite Muslims are moving in and people are saying southern Lebanon is going to become another Iran. Does this bother you and what does it mean, would it be a major setback for our Mideast policy? Well, it has to bother anyone because that's a quite radical faction that is moving, and we have to remember though that the very thing that we set, went in there originally hoping could be resolved was the differences between factions. That radical faction is matched by the Sunni Muslims and they have their own forces and then there is of course the Christian militia and the others, but it has been our hope that the government of Lebanon can somehow bring a reconciliation between these various forces and begin to have a government where, like in our own country, people live together in peace regardless of their religious differences. In switching rapidly to the Southern Pacific, the U.S. is considering severe retaliatory measures against the New Zealand government in response to that country's refusal to allow our Navy ships to come into harbour. Are we overreacting or are we worried more about the severity of this response and the impact it may have, say, if the Japanese follow suit? Well no, what we're doing is more in sorrow than in anger. How can you have an alliance, the Anzis alliance that we have, if then one of them chooses not to participate or to cooperate when a part of your alliance is based on maneuvers and practice about ensuring the security of the area? So what we've simply done is just cancelled out any, mainly what we're doing is canceling out any of the joint maneuvers that we were going to hold with them, because if we can't go into their harbors it's a little ridiculous, so we've just set that aside. We are continuing with the Anzis, with Australia. And you're not concerned about the impact that the Japanese may perhaps do the same thing because they have a ban against nuclear weapons being in their ports, too? But I think we have a better relationship now with them and they have even increased their own military defense capacity because they recognize the need for full cooperation. Absolutely. Let me do one more. Lee, why don't you... Well, I can't let you go without a political question or two. You've restrained from endorsing Vice President Bush for the 88 presidential nomination, but many of your top staffers seem to be voting with their feet and moving to the Bush camp. Doesn't this amount to a sort of powerful, unofficial signal by your White House that Bush is your man? Well, you'll have to ask the people who are moving and all I can tell you is that we have a very healthy relationship, more so I believe, than has been customary in the past between Presidents and Vice Presidents. And I just... I don't feel that this is the time to be getting involved in anything of that kind. That's a long way away and we've got an awful lot of important things to do in these next four years. But aren't you worried about the prospect of some very bloody inter-party conflict between possibly Mr. Bush's establishment backers and the so-called conservative populist followers of Congressman Jack Kemp? Well, I'll tell you, back in California, we had a very successful program that worked and I believe in it even at the national level. And that is, obviously, you're going to have contests, obviously you're going to have primary challenges against each other. But in California, we tried a thing that was called the 11th Commandment. And I would like to see it instituted in the coming elections, 86 and 88, at a national level. And the 11th Commandment is, Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.  And it actually worked in California. There you go, bringing the Bible as a policy. Thank you very much. It's not like you're missing a good party next door. Yes. Well, I'm supposed to drop in there. I'm a little hard. That's all right. Great to see you again. Thanks a lot. Oh, that's great.


Suppose we'd have a very thin conducting shell of some radius R and let's say it is charged uniformly with some charge capital Q. The question we wanna try and solve in this video is find out what the electric field looks like everywhere. We will start by taking a random point outside first, then we'll look at what happens inside, but that's the goal. Figure out what the electric field looks like everywhere and start with outside at some point P. How do we calculate this? Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is I ask myself, I know the charge. Given the charge, how do I calculate electric field? Is there anything that I know about it? Well, yeah, we have studied Coulomb's law. Coulomb's law tells me that if there is a charge Q, then the electric field at some distance R is gonna be this formula, one by four pi epsilon naught Q divided by R squared. So can I just go ahead and substitute and solve this? No. And I want you to think a little bit about this. Why can't I use Coulomb's law directly and solve it in one step? Why can't I do that? Can you pause and think about it? Well, if you've tried, the main reason is because Coulomb's law only works when we're dealing with point charges. What does that mean, you mean? What does that mean? Well, what that means is if you have a charge which is so tiny, the charge is so tiny compared to the distance where you're calculating the electric field, then you can use this. You can say this is a point charge. But in our case, notice the charge is not, it's not just concentrated at one place. It's distributed over this sphere. And so it's not a small negligible sized charge. Now we're dealing with a charge which has a spherical distribution of radius R, right? So we cannot use Coulomb's law directly. I mean, think about it. What would the R over here represent? Would it be distance from this charge? Would it be distance from this charge? R is the distance from charge, right? Now if the charge is distributed, how do you figure out what R is? You can't. And so we cannot directly use Coulomb's law. So what do we do? Well, one way to solve this, using Coulomb's law, I mean, you can still solve it, but you can't do it directly. But one way to do that is you take this charge distribution and divide it into tiny, tiny pieces. What I mean is you can first calculate the electric field over here only due to discharge. Neglect everything else. Only due to discharge, calculate what the electric field is. A tiny charge over here. Then you calculate the electric field only due to discharge. Then you calculate the electric field only due to discharge and so on and so forth.  Now does that sound tedious? Yes, it's gonna be tedious. There'll be a lot of integration involved in that, but it can be done. You can use Coulomb's law in all situations and calculate such problems. It can be done, but it's very tedious. And that's the thing about this. That's the thing I wanna discuss in this video. Is there a way to solve this problem without doing complicated integrals? The answer is yes. We have to get rid of Coulomb's law. Coulomb's law is not gonna be helpful for us. Let's get rid of the Coulomb's law. Yeah, Coulomb's law is not gonna be helpful, but you know what will be helpful for us? Gauss's law. Remember Gauss's law, which tells that if you take a closed surface, the flux through it will always equal total charge inside that surface divided by epsilon naught. And of course, if you're not familiar with this, we have discussed this in great detail in a previous video. You can go back and practice as well, but we can use Gauss's law to solve it over here. Now, looking at Gauss's law, you might say, hey, how can I use Gauss's law? Even there also, there is an integral, right? Isn't this also gonna be complicated? The whole point of using Gauss's law, and this will be true in any problem that we use Gauss's law, the whole point is you choose a closed surface such that the electric field everywhere on that surface is gonna be the same, at least in most cases. It's gonna be the same. Then that electric field can be pulled out of this integral, as we will see. And then the mathematics becomes very simple. You don't even actually have to integrate. That's the whole idea. So you can't do this for all cases. Only in certain special cases, you can choose such a closed surface. And we will see this is one of those special cases. And so the whole idea is, in such special cases, let's not use Coulomb's law. Let's use Gauss's law to solve the electric field. Okay, so let's begin. I'm pretty sure you're excited. So the first step would be to choose a closed surface, right? What kind of closed surface would I choose over here? Before answering that question, we need to first look at what the electric field looks like everywhere. Only then we can choose an appropriate closed surface. So let me get rid of this equation for a while and think a little bit about what would the electric field look like everywhere? Outside. Inside we'll come back a little bit later, but think about outside. Given that it's a spherical distribution, it's a spherically symmetric, meaning the charges are uniformly distributed, because of that, we will find that the electric field everywhere has to be along the radius. It's gonna be a radial field. And we will find that the field at a distance r, at any point, if you go any point at a distance r, you will get the field value to be exactly the same. So radial field whose value only depends upon the distance from the center. But of course, the question could come into your mind. How do I know this? Why should it be radial? And that's really important. I want to ask a lot of why questions over here, because a lot of details involved. So conceptually, this is very, very enriching. So if you had to convince this to someone, how would you convince them? Why would the field be radial? In fact, guess what? I want you to explore and interact with this derivation. So let's continue this in our article on our website, where you get to pause and wonder. If you're stuck, you can always get the solution. You get to try each step yourself. It'll be kind of rediscovering the whole derivation yourself. So it won't be just me talking and telling you what to do like in a normal video fashion. Yes, of course, this will take a little longer, but I believe your learning would be more solid and fun. And of course, if you're watching this on YouTube, then here's a link to continue on to our free website. So the next step would be for you to come up with an argument as to why this field is radial, should be radial.