Hello, good afternoon. Thanks everybody for coming. So my name is Kyle Rankin. I am the Chief Security Officer for a company called Purism. We make privacy and security-focused laptops that run free software and soon-to-phone, but that's not what I'm here to talk about. So before I talk about this topic, I thought it would be sort of important. So I'm going to be covering some content in this talk that might upset some people. And so I would like to warn ahead of time, talk about some of the content that might be, some people may find upsetting.  So if you are a veteran of the Unix Wars, I'm going to be talking about the Unix Wars, not in great detail, but in some detail. So if you are a veteran of that war, and this might bring back some sort of post-traumatic stress of remembering what it was like back then, there will be depictions of some of the battles, just letting you know. Just wanted to put that out there. Okay, so all of you, now you know. If you develop proprietary software, just a heads up, I'm going to be saying negative things about proprietary software. So if you write free software on the side, but your day job is getting paid to write proprietary software, I might say something negative and it may upset you. Hopefully not, we're all friends here. If you use the cloud, because I wanted to make sure they include everyone. So if you use the cloud, I might say something in this talk that upsets you, offends you, makes you question or be concerned about your choices, or my choices too. So just putting all of that out there. So now that everyone's ready, we're all safe. If you feel uncomfortable, we, you know, we can always leave and we can talk about it afterwards. Okay, so all that out of the way, I just wanted to start by talking about how we won. I mean, congratulations everyone. I mean, if you were to talk to anyone about Linux right now in free software, what they would tell you is we won in all sorts of ways. We're super excited about how we've won. We tell people if they will listen to us about how much we've won and dominate the world now. So for example, Linux and FOS is everywhere. If you were to look, turn over a rock and it's probably running Linux or at least some free software somewhere, right? Everything's running Linux. So your pocket probably is running Linux or maybe it's not. But at least the dominant operating system right now, if you dig past all of the proprietary code and get right to the bottom of it, you'll find a little bit of Linux in there, and a little bit of free software. So, and that's in a lot of people's pockets, the majority of people's pockets in the world. In your home, right now while you're here, when it's not DDoSing other people's networks, you have devices in your home that are running Linux probably. Your fridge, your refrigerator might even be running Linux. Your toaster, I mean people in the olden days would joke about net BSD running and everything including a toaster, but I think a lot of the smart toasters these days are running Linux. So it's ubiquitous.  So it's very common, I mean that's, it's the main way that people do software development these days is look for existing free software. And of course in the cloud, so I mean Linux and free software just completely dominated the cloud. If you look at cloud offerings today, the majority of the virtual machines that are running in the cloud are running some form of Linux. Usually the default is some kind of Linux. And in addition to that, a lot of the services that they are offering, a lot of the use, the way that people use the cloud is to run free software services of some kind. Or there, in some cases, their own applications that they launch, if they are not free software, they are at least often built using free software frameworks. So we've just completely dominated the cloud. I mean it's, it's really, when you ask most people about this, they either talk about we won because of your pocket or we won because of the cloud. But I mean, so we've won with the cloud so much that Microsoft now loves Linux. Not only do they love Linux, but they have professed their love for Linux in public on numerous occasions, some more romantic than others. But in any case, they love Linux now. This is something that would have been unthinkable for a long time ago, but it was largely a result of how Linux thoroughly dominated the cloud and caused Microsoft to look into their cloud strategy and if you're trying to sell a lot of companies into moving into your cloud platform, which you view as the future of your company, and they say, okay, great. And they say, well, yeah, this cloud platform is great. We can run all of your Windows servers that you currently have in the cloud on our cloud. And they say, okay, cool, but what about the other 90% of our servers? How is your Linux store? And so they had to dramatically rethink how they approached the cloud. And now our huge advocates for free software and huge advocates for Linux, in fact, they love it. So if you're going to point to another reason why we won, that would be a pretty good reason because a lot of us who were originally, who have been around in this community for a long time, that was like the enemy. You know, like there was this sense like forums would just the $M sign stuff that I'm sure some of you probably still do. Like a lot of that stuff is going on forever. Okay, so but if we won, then who lost? You know, if there's winners and losers, then who lost? Well, I kind of already talked about it most, if you were to ask somebody in the community that's been around for a while, who lost when if Linux won, then they would probably say Microsoft. But honestly, I don't like, really, we're mostly just talking about Windows Server here because like I said, they've complete, it's sort of like there's not a lot of people in here probably that would say, man, IBM, you know, they'd be really mad about big blue from back in the 80s, right? Because they started spray painting tux graffiti in the 90s on sidewalks and stuff and every or maybe it's 2000. Anyway, everyone's like, well, yeah, they're a big advocate for Linux now and everyone is not concerned about anything in the past. And so a lot of people still sort of dwell on Microsoft, but the downside of doing this, and I would caution you against doing this too much, is if we continue to look in the rear view mirror about the battles we had in the 90s and the early aughts. In the meantime, we've allowed all of these other giants to sort of come in and take their place and we don't really notice because we're like, yeah, but remember that time when Microsoft's like embedded Internet Explorer? That was awful, you know. So I would suggest not to dwell too much on that. Who else lost a son? So Linux's success was largely at the expense of son and their dominance in server rooms. You could argue that in addition to Microsoft Windows server not getting as much of a footprint in the data center, Linux also supplanted the existing Unixes that were in the data center and son took the brunt of that ultimately being acquired by Oracle. But we're going to get more into that. Research and motion. A long time ago, everyone sort of thinks that every, if you're winning today and someone's dominant today that it will always be that way and no one can ever, you know, kind of fall from their pedestal, but everyone was using a phone from this company, Research and Motion, a long time ago. That was the platform. Celebrity, everyone from celebrities to dignitaries all the way down to your average person in an office were using Research and Motion phones. But their operating system and their company was really affected by Linux's dominance on the cell phone market and in particular providing this nice platform for creating applications on phones. And proprietary Unix often in many cases lost because of this. In some cases the companies went out of business. In other cases they're still around, but in some cases proprietary Unix will always be around probably. There's still administrators running AIX systems in a number of places. But largely Linux's success was at the expense of proprietary Linux or Unix. Also embedded OS's. You know all those Internet of Things devices that we talked about before that are DDoSing everyone all the time and never being updated. That's because they're running Linux. They're not running a proprietary embedded OS. They're any more usually. I mean there's these companies are still around but on the average if you're going to make a new toaster that is smart and sends you a tweet whenever your toast is done it's probably going to be running some sort of Linux embedded OS with some sort of proprietary application on top of it. Okay so we won but did we really win though? Maybe we won at some point but I get the sense that if we did win if you would argue that we did win then we're losing we're starting to lose some of that ground that we gained when we did win that battle. So what do I mean? So when I was a kid and had my first computer so to date myself it had floppy disks and the way that you would get software is in my case I would go down to the grocery store and they had this little cart that had different shareware floppy disks that you could buy and that's when I you know my first exposure to games like Commander Keen and Wolfenstein before it was 3D and things like that and the idea behind the software was you would get a floppy disks and it was essentially a demo and the idea was you would share this floppy disk with your friends who would install it and and for free what you would get is a demo or like the first level of a game and if you're and then if you wanted the rest of the game then you would pay money and you would get what we would now call the pro version of the game that would unlock all the rest of the levels. Well we have the same thing today basically if most of the applications on our smartphones are some form of shareware one way or the other it's either free and the money is being made by advertising or otherwise capturing and selling your data or it's or there's they it's free and it's sort of like a demo where half of the features are disabled right and so and if you want everything enabled then you you buy the pro version and in all of these cases the code is not available it's all while there are a free software applications on on mobile devices for sure the great majority of them are some form of shareware your company's code so I mentioned before how great it was that your company is using all of this free software when it's writing its internal applications that it then closes right companies well of course there's exceptions and hopefully there's a lot of exceptions in this audience but on the average if you were to go to a startup and who's really excited about all of these frameworks that are out there that allow them just to get bootstrapped and running an application they would then take that application using all of those free software frameworks and their company's code would then be locked behind the walls of the company and and not be released so there's open core so this is a phenomenon where it sort of dovetails a lot with startups so the idea behind open core is that you have some section of the code base that is free software and then surrounding it in some way either via plugins or an enterprise version everything there is a proprietary version of it where the source code is not released in it and that's usually how the company makes the money often open core companies will start so when you're doing a startup usually you get a very small amount of money to sort of seed the startup and you can't afford a lot of developers and so a lot of times in open core companies what will happen is you will create a free software project and put it out there and that way you can get community interest and it's almost like you know sort of demos and get some built some excitement about the product you're building get a lot of free development and then most most important when you're doing a software startup is to have some sort of prototype that's that works that would be suitable for enterprise so you can then provide that demo to venture capitalists and get your next round of funding so usually what happens then is you get this community going you get that first round demo you give it to you then can demonstrate that to venture capitalists who will give you you know a million or two million dollars or something or however much and then you can hire some of those open core developers who are in the community the best ones bring them in and then they can start working on your proprietary enterprise product while occasionally backcourting things eventually you if you're successful you have this nice successful company that's starting to build revenue and then you can hire a lot of developers you get more investment and then ultimately when it ends up happening is the free software thing often becomes sort of a demo it's sort of it's considered often a toy where the real you wouldn't really use the free software for enterprises because it's kind of a toy like proprietary software is what you need for the enterprise and so that's and ultimately you have this weird separation where features get added to the enterprise version and the open source version of the free software version the community tries to backport them which is weird because the company is supposed to be maintaining both but then the community has to backport these enterprise features in some cases things like encryption I would like my network to be encrypted well you must be an enterprise if you care about that right so the cloud so we won the cloud right there's there are more Linux VMs and free software in the cloud than anything else but what's where is the software that runs the cloud you know I mean we nominally think well yes it's probably all running Linux and there's VMs that are running Linux but the way that most people use the cloud and I'm going to get into this more later is not very open that you wouldn't really know that it's running free software or that it's Linux you generally interact with it through a series of apis that that are based on some service that you don't have the source to and you're talking to it via that way so in many ways especially when you look at the cloud we are returning to the time before the rise of Linux and FOS there's a lot of this ground that we gained that we're losing for a number of different reasons that I'll get into so but then that's a so in essence it's the same sort of thing where we have a brand new play or at the same table we have brand new actors so we have new tech giants but the battle is largely the same it's still sort of this notion of is free software a toy or is it legitimately you should be used for enterprise and is it good suitable for production all of us would probably say yeah well of course it is but some of that's being called in the question and if you listen to a lot of people's marketing who are selling proprietary software they have that sentiment where basically well yeah if you want to dabble if you're a hobbyist you go over here to the free software side but if you're serious if you're a business and and you need to depend upon software then it has to be locked up in proprietary that's the only thing you can trust so part of the premise of this talk is to say well it seems like we're we're starting to rehash a battle what can we apply from the last time we had a battle like this and one to the situation today and so the bulk of this talk is going to be talking about that so let's talk about the Unix Wars a little bit I told you I would so there's a period of time where the network was the computer this was you know before let's talk about before the dot-com boom because I'm going to get into that so the network was the computer so that means we had we had these end user workstations that were not very powerful and in many different ways they lacked resources in a number of different ways and so what we would do is move storage because you know we didn't have huge hard drives where we could you know store all kinds of things on our workstations we didn't have a lot of storage so we would move storage computation and even desktop environments all on the network and so you would have this this is after just a normal like a dumb terminal that had just text we're talking like graphical desktops would be on the network and come over the network because it was the local workstation may not have enough resources to handle it this is a time where the transition from mainframes into large Unix servers so instead of like one one standalone gigantic mainframe you would start having smaller but still cheaper but still relatively expensive servers running Unix there was a number of main hardware vendors and each of them had their own flavor of proprietary Unix that would run so Sun had Solaris IBM had AIX HP had HP UX and then Silicon Graphics had Erics and each of them would bundle that Unix with their operating system it wasn't necessarily something that was charged for but it was their operating system that would that would come with the hardware you bought the thing is this these operating systems were proprietary we couldn't see the code but they did have open API's and they had a POSIX standard which meant that you could write applications for one and be relatively assured that if you followed the standard your application would run well on another Unix this was incredibly powerful for developers because you I mean as you can imagine you want this kind of compatibility what ultimately ended up happening though was people would then take the existing proprietary Unix especially as as this became more dominant in some of the user space became a little stagnant people would put GNU tools on top a lot of so the GNU project started rewriting a lot of these user space tools on the command line and in a compiler and having that all be free software and so one of the first things you would do as an administrator would be you would install all these GNU tools in fact a lot of the first free software companies that that became successful became successful out of providing support for free software on proprietary platforms not on Linux the other thing to notice each of these companies have incredibly amazing engineering teams very very smart people really doing cutting-edge work in a lot of different fields it's not like all of them were doing we're making incredible advances in computing at the time some of the engineers from each of these companies moved on to do incredibly great things after they left that particular company the main focus was on hardware features in redundancy so what I mean by that is you would see things like hot swappable CPUs and RAM in one gigantic machine and then the software that could handle doing that without losing any workload on the machine there was also this sort of assumption while and I'm sure in some cases people did blends that there's this assumption that if you have if you were if a sun shop you were a sun shop and you only had sun hardware if you're an IBM shop you only had hardware for once vendor and that's where you would get everything so let's contrast that with the cloud wars in the cloud wars the network is the computer there's this notion that we have these small devices that don't really have enough resources to do everything themselves and so they reach out to the cloud for resources so things like file storage because there's not a lot of storage often on mobile devices computation you will run all of that in the cloud and even desktops a lot of people will have remote desktops and there's a couple of companies that provide security solutions where they will take a desktop and sort of sandboxing in a cloud environment and you can use it and if it gets infected you can you know wipe it and restart but it's all on the network so in this case the transition instead of from mainframes to large servers is from large servers that were local that turned into really small but remote virtual machines so in this case the players were talking about amazon with aws google with gcp microsoft with azure and oracle and there's a number of other providers that all want a piece of this cloud pie because they see that it's you know in many cases the future of providing like profitable services so again this is all these are services are all proprietary but they do publish their apis their apis aren't this is aren't compatible with each other unlike with with unix where you at least had a standard to code against generally with these providers their apis well open are also proprietary and there's not a lot of collaboration between making them agree with each other and like with unix you would take this cloud environment with proprietary apis and then you would put false tools on top of it it could be linux vms it could be your false application of some kind like my sql or something some sort of rails application or your entire you know your entire environment again all of these companies hire amazing incredibly smart people and to build these platforms and they have all kinds of advanced features very smart people making these things and every year you hear about all of these new features all of these new things that make your life easier all of these new innovations on these platforms in this case the focus is more on software features than really hardware features I mean hardware features are saying well we added a new 7x large whatever you know like they add maybe a faster machine but it's not really that's not where the innovation is the innovation is on all the software services and the redundancy there's also the assumption that you get everything from a single vendor these vendors are not operating thinking well yeah you're going to get a little bit from me and a little bit from Azure and a little bit from GCP or whatever they all assume you're going you're going to use them for everything okay so let's go back in time again so now we're done with the we're still in the middle of the Unix awards but let's scoot ahead to the dot-com boom so the dot-com boom was this era where if you took a business model and then put it on the internet you could get a lot of venture capital and so a lot of people did this they would say well what if we took a grocery store and we put it on the internet or what if we took a bookstore and we put it on the internet and everyone's like that's a stupid idea or they said that's a genius idea I don't even know how to evaluate you because it's on the internet the rules don't apply anymore so if you knew that if you took a business and put it on the internet that you could make millions and millions and billions of dollars then wouldn't you start to spawn new websites that were running some interesting business and so there's this huge push for new websites all over the place everybody needs a website now but where before they didn't know what the worldwide web was now everybody needs a website your company needs a website everyone's trying to buy up all the .com domains because they now are instantly super valuable lots of servers lots and lots of servers to make this work which means huge data center growth if you're in this if you're in Silicon Valley during the time they were building up taking properties and building in data centers they couldn't they couldn't build them fast enough they're often waiting lists to rack servers they were just filling up constantly all the way through the bust but they were I mean it was amazing time for data center growth in the area and Sun Solaris dominates now I'm sure there are fans of other platforms that would say well mate I don't know or like we didn't use that or whatever but a lot of people's data centers were running Sun and Solaris machines during the beginning of the .com boom so normally you would have hardware maybe running NSCA or Netscape web server depending on you know Netcraft would say it would be NSCA mostly but one of the other you would probably run some sort of see your Java middleware that would do some sort of you know application logic and then all of this would be housed in a really big can never go down oracle database the one database you know if you if you have environments now where there's the one server that can't go down it's probably your oracle database from this era so most of the software development for these .coms where for this web these web applications were done on proprietary workstations at the time the proprietary workstations were probably running Windows or Solaris so there's this sort of famous quote that Sun put out as part of their marketing saying we are the .in.com to sort of demonstrate their dominance with .com servers they were actually referring to a the fact that they were a major DNS server at the time the dot is it's weird because the dots not even in .com it's the missing dot the invisible dot that you don't see at the end because they were a root name server DNS nerds yeah all right I'm not a tattoo guy but if I could tattoo DNS anyway that's that's personal okay so let's go to head to the next .com boom where what we did was we took a business model and we put it in the cloud which you might say well that sounds an awful lot like putting something on the internet and I say yeah that's exactly this it is exactly the same thing so there's but this time it's a massive push for new web services because what was happening it was everyone was starting to use this computer in their pocket as one of their primary computing devices and everyone saw this huge business opportunity in creating some sort of application that they could put in this computer in your pocket that would talk to this web service and somehow make your life easier and all of these businesses started moving all of their platforms to cloud providers to provide the computation and the heavy lifting you needed because you were running on this sort of underpowered computer in your pocket lots of VMs lots and lots and lots of VMs you needed lots of VMs for one they were cheap and they were small and they were sort of underpowered unless you spent a lot of money on them and the other thing was they were notoriously unreliable but it's your fault when they went down because they told you we're unreliable it's not our fault things are going to crash all the time the network's going to disconnect sometimes it's really just an unstable environment that's your fault so everyone started learning how to build very redundant systems which meant lots of VMs and VMs spread out all over the place and then you would do that and then there would be a massive outage somewhere and somehow your service would go down anyway and it would be your fault and then you would find out there's a bigger basket your eggs were you thought your eggs were in three baskets but they were actually just in one basket that was bigger so this also this spawned a huge growth in cloud infrastructure companies Amazon had the head start here and so they massively expanded became sort of the fault but there were a lot of other platforms both just pure cloud infrastructure where you would get VMs and other ones that would sort of contain an application and run an application for you that started like growing and now there's a lot of consolidation in the industry but there's a lot of these companies that were spawning from this and in this case we're talking about a migration off of traditional data centers so a lot of people were also saying well it's about time to buy new servers but boy they're expensive and the network engineers and system and they're running them are pretty expensive too what if we put it all in the cloud we wouldn't need it nearly as big of a team we wouldn't have to buy this have this big capital expense that we have to make every three to five years and so a lot of companies started making this migration like I said AWS dominated it still dominates because it had this great head start and everyone just sort of the fact they'll start moving to it although again there's a lot of contenders now that are trying to win the crown in the cloud wars and but what you normally would see is some sort of Linux VM it was running either Apache or IngenX the middleware was a blend of a bunch of different languages probably Ruby, Python, Java, JavaScript usually and then on the back end you would have like a MySQL or a Postgres server or maybe a NoSQL database and that would be that's sort of like the traditional stack early on at least before it became more service oriented again software development during the dot-com boom 2.0 was on proprietary workstations this time mostly on MacBooks and then on Windows machines as well and this also saw a lot of common FOS services so what would happen is a lot of people would say we like this NoSQL database and they're like everyone's using this NoSQL database and they're all creating their own NoSQL database putting it in a VM and the cloud provider started looking at the most popular services that people were using and say what if we hosted that for them and they would just go through us we'll make it a little bit cheaper than it would cost to set it up themselves and they could just use our custom service our proprietary service instead of setting it up themselves and so they started doing this and then putting sort of an API in front of it to manage it and you started seeing this more and more and more where if a service is popular it's only a matter of time before it becomes a new custom service let's go back in time again so we're back at middle of the dot-com boom and Linux is dismissed as a toy by Unix's if you were to talk to any of them about well yeah I was thinking about maybe setting up a Linux server I've been hearing good things about it all of these major Unix companies would say that's a toy it's maybe it's good for a hobbyist but if you want to do real work you need a real production quality operating system you can't handle real load with this but then we have the release of the Apache web server and it's hard to underscore how important the Apache web server was for Linux and its success in the data center because what it did it had this in particular it had this great feature called virtual hosts and what that meant was you could host multiple websites on one web server where if you're spending if you're buying a bunch of expensive individual servers and you can only run one website on them that's kind of a pain you can run multiples that's great it was cross-platform so you could run a Linux and Apache on commodity hardware you didn't have to buy expensive servers you could buy a random Intel server and run a website on it you also had a lampstacks and this is something that replaced a traditional sort of sun and oracle blend that people would would do and this is a combination of Linux and Apache MySQL was a database in Perl originally as this middleware and so there's this service called this standard called CGI the common gateway interface that would allow you to write snippets of code that you would then put on a server that was running CGI if you hit a URL it would execute that code take some inputs from the web query do some work and then output result output HTML to the browser so ISPs started doing this thing where they would allow you to upload snippets of code ultimately PHP became more popular for this but you would upload snippets of Perler PHP code to an ISP's web server because they wanted to offer web services and by doing that what they would let you do is you would execute it on the fly if someone hit this it was amazing mind-blowing if you would hit this you end point it would execute this code and give you this return there's this other problem they cropped up where people were buying this incredibly redundant but single Sun servers to run Oracle and they're very expensive because they could hot swap CPUs they could hot swap RAM they had all of these amazing features but they were expensive and it turns out some people said well what if I just put my SQL on three servers that were about $5,000 because they're Intel and if one goes I don't have to I can't hot swap CPUs but I can take a server out and so people started doing this and this started dramatically eating in to profits and it starts the trend that ultimately replaces proprietary Linux in my opinion with a proprietary Linux with Linux and so Linux FOS then wins the Linux wars so let's get ahead to there's this new technology that's just came out that's referred to as serverless and what serverless is is if you were to look at a CGI script which is a snippet of code that you could run somewhere upload and if you hit an end point you would execute serverless is that only it's proprietary because back in CGI days you could take a CGI script and put it on your ISP you could put it in your own server running Apache with a CGI module or you could put it on a competitor it didn't really matter but with the modern approach to CGI is to have sort of a custom language a custom API that only runs on one cloud provider but the same sort of story otherwise the interesting thing about serverless is that you have this further separation between the developer and the actual FOS services and Linux that are there because you're not really interacting with an icky Linux server that's running FOS services you're just sort of dealing with an API the ultimate goal is honestly just working with APIs not to have to deal with servers or not have to deal with services just sort of write APIs this also conveniently makes it hard to leave the platform because if your entire code base isn't even transferrable because it's using all of these little snippets of code that use a custom API it's that much more difficult to leave is there Linux or FOS behind these serverless services? I don't know I haven't seen the code so it's possible but I haven't seen the code so who knows so I'll let this say this goes back to the premise of this talk which is the cloud is the largest proprietary any cloud infrastructure is the largest proprietary OS on the planet so AWS, Google Cloud if you were a lot of people don't think of them that way because they think yeah but it's split up in a bunch of these little VMs and like well what about mainframes don't didn't mainframes have a bunch of these little isolated processes but they had a single operating system in the cloud any cloud infrastructure largely operates as one single unified but proprietary operating system where's the code if you wanted to run an instance of AWS or GCP or Azure at home could you do that could you download and build their code and then run a smaller instance of it yourself no you couldn't but we don't really think of it that way largely because the APIs are open right we think well the APIs are exposed so that's all that really matters because they document they're well of course they're gonna document their APIs that's otherwise they're not very useful but a lot of people mistake documented APIs with openness so usually like today's does if you were to have a developer or assistant men work on the cloud today as it's intended to be used and they haven't they didn't have a lot of background they would get very minimal exposure to Linux and FOS generally speaking in my prediction in the next five or 10 years the job description for both will become the same which is basically I'm writing API glue but I might be writing it for different services but the jobs will sort of converge into someone who's basically writing API glue code to use the cloud the other interesting thing is a lot of people just sort of accept vendor lock in these days it's odd because if I say there's a point in time where vendor lock in was like a bad word and you said they're like ooh yeah I don't want that and now a lot of people are saying well what's the big deal with vendor lock in of course you would be foolish to switch to another platform because my cloud's too big to fail it will never have any flaws there's never been any history of any cloud having an outage and my provider will always stay in business you know but here's another question okay fine maybe it's too big to fail but what happens if your cloud wins or what happens if a cloud that you're not using wins and yours loses what do you think the cloud provider would do then how do you think their innovation in all of this rapid development would go and their pricing structure would go if they won and they were the dominant player put it another way if they won would protocols on the internet really need to stay open if all of the websites on the internet mostly and all of the web if all the websites we're running on one cloud provider wouldn't they would they need to communicate with each other using open standards couldn't you foresee a day where someone says well yeah but all of this HTTP stuff is pretty slow we're going to replace it with a with a custom service so if you're inside our cloud you get this all of these benefits of our speed if you're outside the cloud of course you're you're slow and awful but if you're inside the cloud you get all the stuff it's not that hard to conceive of the other thing is if all of these services replaced Linux VMs with something proprietary would anyone notice I mean those of us who go to the cloud and spawn a Linux VM would notice but people using the cloud as it's intended to be used would have no idea you could just switch out or my no sequel service with one that's running proprietary code instead of a standard free software version and no one would notice and a lot of people wouldn't care so what do we do like us what do we do about this well the first thing is to look back into why did Linux and FOS when to begin with so I would argue that son's dominance early on led to some complacency and some arrogance the whole thing of well Linux is just a toy it will never do anything and that also led them to sort of dismiss some of the advances it was making and innovation started slowing in not so much in the hardware but in particular for the user interface so things like you would commonly hear people talk about I would get my my workstation open I log into my son's server I type a commit oh I made a mistake backspace oh why does the backspace work and this is like a small little trolley comment except that there's this notion that well yeah the backspace doesn't work you're not using a son workstation if you use a son workstation with a son keyboard it would work fine all you have to do is add this scty command and it's totally fine but what it points to is more of this arrogance that went along with well we're never going to update tar to have modern command line arguments which nowadays did you know that you don't even have to specify like what compression algorithm to use when you're when you're uncompressing something but but they didn't they didn't do that like back then it was just like it was just straight up vanilla tar vanilla everything that's why people installed the new tools to begin with because the free software world was innovating faster here's the thing there were more FOSS engineers and son engineers a lot of people like to think well yeah but they're super smart engineers they're the best and that may be but there's also only so many of them that are working on software and when you compare to the world of free software developers there's a dramatic difference software innovations outpaced the rest of the innovations that everyone was making that's why everyone shifted to it in addition because the openness of everything the cross-platform compatibility it turned hardware into this commodity you could run this platform on anything ultimately it even made sons look into doing x86 and eventually even opening their their software and and Solaris but by then it was too late okay but that doesn't tell us what we do right so so what do we do well one is you should recognize proprietary code when you see it or I should say when you don't see it there's a lot of times where we just have this we don't even really think about it we a lot of a lot of people just focus on is the API open but ask yourself when you're using a service okay well that's cool if I wanted to run it myself could I download the code can I at least inspect the code even if I don't know how to run it myself to see what it's doing large a lot of times the answer is no I would say we should resist proprietary services vendors make it very easy to only use them for everything that's the whole point vendors have always done this I mean the vendor lock-in has existed forever I started a series on this at Linux Journal to talk about some of the old stories of vendor lock-in because I'm I'm honestly not sure that a lot of people are familiar with the problems of vendor lock-in so that's the next thing ideally everyone could do who's been around and understands what can happen when a vendor has tight control of your entire environment is tells tell your stories share with people some of the problems with that here's the thing is the fact that we as a community are open and we focus on compatibility and we and we share our source code is our advantage and we don't always realize that as an advantage but it allows us to do certain things that proprietary companies would never do they could they couldn't do because it would impact their it would impact their business too much to free some of their software it allows us to take it we can take advantage of that and allows us to do things that they can't please share your innovations if you're coming up with if you've developing software that solves a real problem please release it under a free license I know it's very tempting to take it and then use it as a start of your new startup very tempting to do that but please consider instead sharing that innovation with everyone else so that we can get a little we can all together get further along than we could otherwise and finally sort of want to pose this question to everyone so one of the big things that that drove linux's success in the data center was this lamp stack this notion that there was this combination of all free software services on a free software operating system that could run on commodity hardware that was not just it was easy to set up it and it was powerful and it was suitable for production loads what's what's the equivalent of that today what's the what's the equivalent thing that would cause everyone to question their use of the proprietary services that they're using today that they're relying on today is there could one be created or is it that if someone were smart enough to come up with something like lamp today they would be too tempted by the desire to close it all up and turn it into a startup and we wouldn't see it hopefully the answer is some of us I mean some of us are already thinking about this problem and are working on some solutions to that which can talk to me about that later but hopefully some of you are also thinking about that what is what the next things that we can work on to reestablish free software as the the the facto way that we do things on the internet because it was that way at one point we all grew up some of us grew up appreciating the benefits but it's not a given and if we don't do something it won't always be there thank you