Okay, so we are right. This is Senate judiciary Monday, June 22, 2020. We're taking up an amendment to the bill that is just been posted to the website. It is draft 2.3. It's 1.3. I don't have that on the website yet. Yep, I'm posting it right now. Is it what you emailed to us, Bryn? No, minor change. We can start to. All right. Well, why don't we start over? Not the committee, but looking for the. I'm still got 1.2 on my judiciary website. Just to be clear, it's 1.3. The only difference is a corrected. Cross reference. Okay. Well, why don't I don't a and then assume that we'll get. Okay. On the intent language and assume that we will get to. By the time we get to see the new. By the time we get to the second amendment, we will be at. Sure thing. So for the record, Bryn here from legislative council, and I'd be happy to just talk about draft 1.2. I could just point out where draft 1.3 has been corrected. Otherwise they're identical. So it's really no problem to look at draft 1.2. So this is an instance of amendment. That would add a new section a one to the beginning of S2 19. To add some language about legislative intent. There are two subsections to this. Section a one. And the first sort of light lays out that the intent of the general assembly is that this S2 19. And it's a legislation that addresses systemic racism and disproportionate use of force by law enforcement. And then it lists several acts, which I can go through 2017 act 54. That was the RDAP bill racial disparities advisory panel. 2018 act nine. That was the act that created the executive. Rational equity. 2013 number act. That was the act that was about the statewide policy on the use of force or the training requirements for electronic control devices and the use of those devices by law enforcement. 2016 act number 163. That was the model state policy for the use of body cameras by law enforcement. And 2017 act number 56. That's the professional regulation of law enforcement bill. That also references act or sorry, S3 38, the justice reinvestment bill, which doesn't yet have an act number because it's not quite done winding its way through the process. And then at the bottom of the page there on page one lines 20 to 21, there's language about how there's legislative committees that act on these issues. So this act is really represents. Just a part of the legislature's ongoing effort to deal with these issues. Sub division subsection B on page two. Sets out the intent of the legislature to that law enforcement use community policing strategies. And practice a guardian mindset towards the citizens that they serve and establish a culture of transparency and accountability that will both promote public safety and foster the public trust. And then the last sentence there is to this end, it's the intent of the general assembly that law enforcement use de escalation strategies first and foremost before using force in every interaction with the community. So I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. Yeah. Questions or changes or comments about. This good work. Yes. Very clear. So jealous. I just wonder if we could go to line three. Section a. And stop the sentence at. That is a period after use of force period rather than saying by law enforcement in Vermont. I don't know that we really. I'm sorry, where are you? Line three. Actually it's line eight. It is. In the draft I'm looking at. So the sentence reads, it's the first sentence in a. Law enforcement agent. It's on line four. In the general assembly law enforcement agencies in Vermont. You want to. I want to drop that. I just wanted to end with disproportionate use of force. I'm sorry. The new draft is on the committee page. Yeah. That makes a difference. I did this one a few minutes ago. So what's your first sentence stick. In line four, page two. It's the intent of the general assembly. Law enforcement agencies in Vermont. Use community policing strategies to develop collaborative partnerships. We law enforcement and communities adopt policies and practices that reflect the guardian mindset towards the citizens they serve. And establish a culture of transparency and accountability. To promote public safety and foster public input. I think Alice is on a section a one a. So the, the, the very start of it. Right. On line eight, I believe is where Alice is. I don't. The version I have doesn't have any line numbers. Right. So you want the, the act as a continuation of the general assembly's work over the past several years to create meaningful reform. To address systematic racism and disproportionate use of force. By law enforcement. And you want to strike in Vermont. I want us. I want us. And disproportionate use of force. Period. Rather than. I can understand taking out Vermont, but I don't understand taking out law enforcement. All right. By law enforcement. Okay. Then take out just in Vermont. Alice, can I ask what your rationale is? I mean, I think this sends a very bad message that we have a lot of disproportionate use of force going on here. And while we have some, I think this sends a message to the entire country that we have a lot. Which we don't. So that's for sure. I can see that, but I guess the other way to look at it would be, it's owning what we do have. You know, it's saying in Vermont, we, we do have this problem. We, I think it would take care of it. I mean, I think we don't have an excessive problem in that area. And I would be fine with taking out in, in Vermont, because, you know, that's understood that we're legislating for Vermont. I think it's important to keep law enforcement. That's fine. Keeping law enforcement is fine. All right. I think there's general agreement to take out in Vermont. Okay. I'll take, I'll strike that. Anything else on that. On the intent section. Okay. Shall I move on to the second instance of amendment? Yeah. And because Matt's not here and not able to change, I'm going to read from his email to us. I think he's on his way. All right. Well, I think what I'll start with is. I know that I didn't express myself well on this today because I didn't really see it coming and had to work from memory. But in taking a closer look at this, I think we're going to move on to the next slide. I think we're going to choose the section that we're proposing to amend. This, it does at this doesn't implicating the entire justice file. The homostat statute as a defense effectively got the use of force provision. That you're referring to an S2, 19. The list. The first paragraphs, one and two deal with. People not law enforcement. doesn't three still let the officer off the hook if he or she is suppressing opposition in the just and necessary discharge of his or duty. If you needed to get the bill out of there today so it wasn't going to argue with Bruce Philip. I think there's an issue here. Just something to think about see highlighted portion. And the highlighted portion isn't the case of a civil officer, or a military officer, or a private soldier when lawfully called out to suppress a riot or rebellion, or to suppress an invasion or to assist in serving legal process in suppressing opposition against him or her and the just and necessary discharge of his or duty. And that would be what that three in justifiable homicide is what would be struck from use in this particular case. And correct me if I'm wrong, Bryn, when a person under the sections regarding the restraints improper restraints. It would not be a defense under three in an improper restraint. Is that correct is that as narrow as it would be. That is correct. So if it's broader. If a police officer uses an improper restraint. They would be able to use three right they would not be able to raise as a defense subdivision three of the justifiable homicide statute. That would only be if the law enforcement officer used a prohibited restraint that caused serious bodily injury or death. What this language would do is it would exclude from the, it would, this defense under 2305 three would not be available to a person being prosecuted under this new statute. But the others one in two would still be available. That's correct. So justifiable homicide that those defenses that are laid out in one and two and this one is essentially self defense or defense of the person's relation would still be available. And the defense of I committed this act in the suppression of to suppress this person from committing a serious violent crime. That would also remain a defense for a person being prosecuted. So, Bryn if we adopt this amendment. We wouldn't we have to change the reference in 219 that we voted out. Because now it says that there's no change to the availability of the defense in this statute. So the amendment draft 1.3 should replace that language that says it strikes that subdivision. Okay, good. In this section should be construed to limit or restrict the availability of that defense. Okay, good. Just so everybody, everybody understands you may be on the committee and those in the, who may be listening in. If we adopt this police officer who would use an improper restraint, could use as a defense.  Yes, that's correct. So, basically the most serious crimes. Well, yes, but we're missing a very major component of police responsibilities. But Joe it's when just to remind ourselves it's when a police officer uses an improper restraint results in death or serious bodily injury to the person who was being restrained. So it's not. If there's a riot. And just to remind us, it's a prohibited restraint. And it's illegal. So they're, they're, they're breaking the law and injuring somebody. They still have these first two defenses. Those first two defenses do not cover a situation. If I am on the ground, being kicked by a riotous mob, and a police officer injects him or herself into that scene. And uses whatever reasonable means are necessary, including a prohibited act in order to stop me from being further kicked. Unless the demonstration is there that I am either being subjected to murder or sexual assault or burglary or robbery. The first two provisions are very specific on how you can use a defense in that case. And what's missing is the ability of the officer to bring calm to a situation that doesn't fit neatly into that definition. But Joe if you think about the tools that are available legally to an officer to stop a riot. If you've all seen television images from the last month and a half. There's a whole panoply of gear that is non lethal, that is called out in the event of a riot. What we're saying is, you, if you see someone kicking someone, it is not proportional, and it is illegal to go in and choke that person out and risk killing them. So, you know what what this, we prohibited these kind of restraints, and we're just making sure that see doesn't inadvertently open the door to using them in any. I mean if you read see it's about as broad as it could be, you could be serving a subpoena, and, and, you know, fall under this. And you and I agree, see is terribly overbroad. Yep. But let's take the case of a riot. There's a reason that word appears in see it does not appear in. It's actually one or two. Under the statute, justifiable homicide has three numerically designated paragraphs it's the third paragraph that you and I agree is overbroad needs to be worked on, but the word riot appears there. It does not appear in the first two sections. So in my mind is I'm reading that if an officer steps into a riotous situation. You may need to use whatever forces necessary at that point but it now as society is changing its attitudes. It falls on the officer to demonstrate why it is they did what they did at that point. I'm trying to reach the place where we don't strip police altogether of things that may need to happen that we all actually would agree needed to happen at that moment in time. But Joe the committee, the committee agreed five to zero to prohibit these restraints. Now what you're arguing is that if, if we can construe something as a riot, they should be allowed to go in and choke whoever they want. And I, I'm just not Philip I'm not saying that I'm saying that there is a very fine line between depriving an officer of a defense that currently exists because we're angry about the way that it has been applied. No, I, that's untrue. Nobody's angry about the way it's been applied we're, we're looking at it now in the light of what's going on around the nation, which is peaceful protests with occasionally violence here or there. But what this provision does is it doesn't even limited to right it says civil process of civil procedure. Philip I agree with you completely that that is overbroad it needs to be removed in this situation. But what, but we haven't got to the point yet, where we're talking about the two things now that an officer would have available as a defense. The two things are very specific and limited. It says they can protect their own life, or the life of a husband wife parent child brother sister master mistress servant guardian or ward. But the officer can't protect me in that situation, but under the other one, but under the other one it says in the suppression of a person attempting to commit murder.  So what we're saying is the officer can't even raise as a defense. Benning is being assaulted. I can't use the defense that I used some improper restraint to try to stop that from. Yeah. First of all, remember that under this is limited to the improper restraint. Second of all, it is only when serious bodily injury and death occurs as a result of that improper restraint that police officer would be charged right. So the mere fact of using it may result in disciplinary issues, but it wouldn't rise to the level of the 20 year felony. If, if the So I, while I understand your example, I was fairly comfortable with Matt's suggestion, because I think, I mean, if we were using it broadly. There's no use of force, et cetera. I still as, as Phillip said, they've still got a number of different avenues. It's when they use an improper restraint. A prohibited restraint. Right. Yeah. Thank you for, I'm still using the wrong term. I've got to get my. I keep saying that because all of the other things guns, pepper spray, different. That we've heard about tasers, pepper balls, all of those things are illegal and can be used under various circumstances. We're saying this one thing is illegal, but you still if you cause bodily injury or serious harm, because you're afraid of your own life. Because you're concerned, Joe, as we discussed it. Now you're broadening it to, if a policeman sees somebody being kicked, they need to be able to cause serious bodily injury by choking someone. And I, I, I think at that point we've gone all the way back to where we started, which is police having the right to choke people when they feel it's necessary. I think that's the level I'm trying to get to a middle ground that enables an argument to be made. I think I don't think. What the amendment now says, and Senator Sears has said, we'll look at C and take testimony later when we have time. What it does now is it prohibit C from being a rationale for using the prohibited restraint. You know, I think you and I agree C needs more work. I would be for striking it all together. Sounds like you would want some modification up. Well, can I, you know, if you use the example of Kent State National Guard, they were not police officers, they were the National Guard at Kent State, which was 50 years ago, which is indelibly marked in all of our minds who are older than 50, I guess. Maybe those of us who are 60 and can remember.  And under this, justifiable homicide, they wouldn't have been culpable at all. So I think in the narrow sense that we're using this and that's why C needs to really be changed under Vermont law and needs to be addressed. And I've committed to taking it up Thursday and Friday. And I'm not sure we'll get through it all in the limited amount of time we have between now and the end of the end of adjournment of the complete session. But I think that, that for the purposes of the narrow purposes of this bill prohibitive restraints, that portion of this bill, that I'm comfortable that one and two provide that. And I'm, and also I want to point out that in the use of force bill, we talk about proportionality, the use of force being proportional. And those crimes in to rise to a level that a DUI or a in the Georgia case, or a $20 counterfeit bill in the Minneapolis case would not rise to where improper use of force or restraint in the Minneapolis case. I'm just want to, that's why I'm willing to support this. But, you know, it's up to the whole committee and if you'd rather not have your name, we can separate these two amendments out so there's different names on the two amendments. I, the overall concept of proportionality, I think is very important here, use the analogy of Kent State. In hindsight, every one of us believes they were way out of line in what they were doing. How do you correct that behavior. When a cop walks up to a group of people on the street who are having a verbal argument and pushes one of them to the ground. To me that's way out of line, totally and proportional to what was actually going on. We all agree to that part of it. There are situations though when we charge officers with keeping the peace that there has to be some way for them to be able to present an argument that what they did was proportional to the circumstances. And at the end of the day it is up to a jury to decide whether that is true or it is not true. And I'm nervous that we are. We're approaching a point where our desire to correct wrong behavior is stretching out a little too far for me to be comfortable. In particular amendment. I'm uncomfortable just depriving the officer of any way to make an argument, unless it falls within the justifiable homicide language that all of us are normally entitled to, because in that uniform they are responsible for doing something you and I are not responsible for. I'm troubled by extending for us is, excuse me, Joe, we've lost the video. I don't know what's happened. Oh, there we are. We're back. Sorry, Joe. That's okay having technical difficulties. And I just got an email from someone saying the YouTube is not screaming so I'm reaching out to it to figure that out as well. Okay. That Valerio has joined us and I don't know if Matt's heard any of the debate or not, but we'd love to have your counsel. I've heard the, I've heard some of it I don't think I've heard it all. And what I heard is a little confusing, but I had concerns about, as you know, last week this using just file invoking just file homicide as part of the bill as well, but I haven't what I haven't seen or what I'm not sure of is what the amendment is. I see amendment would would strike three. So a person who kills a police officer who uses an in a prohibited restraint again, keep using the term improper, a prohibited restraints with it results in serious in depth the serious bodily injury would be able to use one and two of justifiable homicide but not three. And just to clarify, Matt, it doesn't strike three. It just says it's not available in this case. Oh, of the of 2305 it struck it says that three isn't available. Yeah, right to an officer. Yeah, right. Who uses the prohibited restraint. Wow, that's some put yourself in the defense attorney's role for a minute and you're facing a jury with that question. Well, I'll just put try to put myself in an officer's position to or or in. See the way this is the way justifiable homicide is written is one and two are for lay people, which could apply to anybody, but three is specifically designed for officers. One of the things this really shows I think this that Senator Sears, I know you're committed to doing this but the justifiable homicide needs to be reworked seriously. Okay, but I don't know that. I thought this was your suggestion that your suggestion was to leave justifiable homicide out of it and allow common law defenses of just, you know, regular self defense and the like to be to be part of it it's kind of it's I'm worried about how a court would interpret it if you left justifiable homicide in but then did but struck three Matt are you saying that we should think about just removing the reference to justifiable homicide all together from to that's what I was trying to get at last week, only because when you create a statute that puts limits on what your defenses might be. Those are the defenses that I think that you end up having I can see a court interpreting it saying look, it'd be it'd be one thing if you use this technique. You know, to suppress one of these crimes that are listed here and number three but if you did it and it wasn't didn't fit those specific categories then now you've got a problem. But as I read Brin's email about that. I haven't had the benefit of that but bring correct me if I'm wrong but you thought there was a conflict between 2305 three and what we were passing and it was not clear which would take precedence that's part of it too. I mean, can I just ask for it. That's correct. I think that the two statute stand in pretty stark opposition to one another. So I think an attorney could make an argument that 2305 would be effectively repealed by the new by the new crime in 1032 if it's silent on whether or not that is available for a for a defense or not. Well, if if the options are to strike the reference to 2305 all together, or the amendment that makes see unavailable, or to go with what Joe wants. I would take the first one, which is getting rid of the reference to 2305 all together. Let me remind you what I originally proposed which was the affirmative defense. See what I what I don't like. Let me just finish with the the onus is on the on the defense to prove that it was justifiable. But I but I feel like then we're offering an affirmative defense that doesn't exist. Now, for a crime that we're prohibiting. We're at once creating a new crime and a prohibition and adding a defense that doesn't exist. So it's, it's a one step forward and half a step back. Whereas I think if we take Matt suggestion and we eliminate the reference altogether. It accomplishes more what we've sent out to do. You know, my understanding is anytime that you guys create a new crime, any of the common law defenses exist. So you can have a defensive self defensive others, and you have the ability to respond proportionally to whatever the threat is sufficient to repel that at any given time and I'm generally giving you self defense type concepts. And I, you know, Brenda you disagree with that interpretation because that's what we do all the time right. I don't I don't disagree with that. I think that my point was because the justifiable homicide statute exists with the specific subsection that deals with law enforcement that there could be an argument made for implied repeal of that section. If it was silent on on 2305 C or three. I'm obviously not taking a position on that I was just pointing it out for the committee that. So, if I could just summarize a little bit so if we take out the reference, and this is to bring. If we take out the reference to 2305. If there was a case where an officer use the prohibited restraint caused serious bodily harm or death. There would still be a determination made by a state's attorney, whether to charge and wouldn't the state's attorney consider these sorts of issues whether it was self defense, etc. And, and then it would move theoretically to a courtroom where again there would be a consideration of these common law defenses, or other defenses available. Right presuming the defense attorney raised, raised the defense yes. Yep. So we're, if we're silent on 2305 in 219. It doesn't leave someone who uses the prohibited defense without a legal defense. They still have multiple possibilities of either not being charged or being acquitted. It's just that we're not offering them a helpful defense in the form of an affirmative defense. I think that's correct all the common law defenses would still be available. I think that the justifiable homicide statute would still be available. The question I had was whether or not that specific part of the justifiable homicide statute could be seen as an implied repeal by the legislature based on the new the new language. It would be fine if it was seen that way because the 2305 three seems to me. I mean it was put in place in the 80s and it was a different time. But when you look at it now it's it's so broad. I can't see how you could ever convict a police officer. It basically immunizes them from almost anything. Not a court may decide that it was there is no implied repeal and it may just be considered a defense to the me listen to this conversation. What's that. The court may listen to this conversation in terms of legislative intent. Yep. I still think that. I won't. I'm sorry to not have a second amendment to this bill. Not to the Constitution. Right. Just in case. Or to go with the suggestion. To remain to go with an affirmative defense. Senator Baruch has been adamant against an affirmative defense. I've been supportive of it because I think it solves all of these problems we've just talked about, but I'm flexible here. I have committed to working on 90. 25, the justifiable homicide statute. I believe that this has highlighted this particular conversation as highlighted the need to revise this and frankly, if we're in a riot, I don't know what the justification is to kill somebody. To suppress a riot or so. I mean, I just don't I need to hear more about that. And why in 1983. That was an amendment in 1983 and I don't know what that amendment was Bryn. But the bill that the law is from obviously from much earlier. So, the use of the term master and mistress and board certainly is from and servant from much earlier than 1983, I'm sure. I think that's right. I haven't been able to get into the building. Look at the. Yeah. Look at the actual books because I've got to look at the books. I would guess that the, that the, that there was an amendment made in 1983. For whatever reason, but that the law itself is probably from maybe even the 1800s. Yeah, that may be. Senator Baruch. So, Dick, I, I, given what we've said, I would move that we. Adopt the intent language and rewrite the second amendment so that it strikes the reference in 219 as past to the 2305. Peace altogether. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Does everybody understand Senator Bruce motion. With that, I think I'm just going to. Okay. Senator what? Just make sure that I understand it. So what you're saying is that we will. Get rid of any reference at all to any. Defense. Yes. Well, yeah. Justifiable homicide. The only thing that was in the bill was a reference to 2305 justifiable homicide. Senator Bruce amendment would strike justifiable homicide that reference from bill. And then add the intent language. It would strike the reference from the bill, but it would leave the statute as it is. Right. Right. And not, and not put in. I'm not going to say that. Senator Sears. None of my wonderful suggestions. Right. I thought your suggestion was wonderful. Thank you. I actually. I think that. I'm. Throughout this whole conversation have been a little nervous about. Kind of what that we're.  And I don't think that there's anything justifiable about somebody doing some of the horrific things that we've seen, but. I, I. There I'm nervous about some of the things that. We are. You know, I think that there, I'm sure we'll be cases on them and. We'll see what happens. I am. I appreciate that. I want to make clear. I'm not nervous about what happens as a result of us. Rehibiting certain restraints. No. They've been. Outlawed. I heard New York City had outlawed them in 1987, yet somebody's accused of using one yesterday. So, you know, that it's, it's something that. I just don't see as. But as, as I've said earlier, and both Senator Nicker and I were trained in restraints. I don't see this as such a. Why anybody's using them is beyond me. And why. You know, kneeling on somebody's neck is, is considered a form of restraint. That's even necessary. So when it's. It's hard. I. So I'll support the amendment from Senator. Or the motion from Senator. Even though I still think that. So with the understanding that we will look at. 2305 justifiable homicide. But I don't know, you know, given the short period of time, we have left what, where it goes. So, so I wonder, could we hear from Matt on where that leaves. A defense for a police officer. What are the, you had said the common law ones would still hold up. But I think so.  Sometimes I don't think that they have. Self or others. But your response has to be proportional to whatever the threat is. You cannot.  Right.  If you are confronted with deathly force, you have the right to meet it with deadly force. And, you know, that is, so that is still available.  That's not, you know, that's, again, a completely different thing. And as it relates to your restraint issue.  And, you know, I, the question is what does it do to that. And I'm not, I'm not exactly sure, you know, what, what circumstances would rise to the level where you would have to use that kind of deadly force. Say you're fighting over a gun. Something like that. I mean, that'd be the, that'd probably be the only kind of thing. It couldn't be for, I mean, the things we're seeing are not, they aren't people being confronted with guns. They're $20, you know, bad bills and DUIs and that kind of thing. I think that the sum and substance of the argument in front of us proportionality seems to be the whole conversation. We all know what's way out of line. And it's that gray area in between that people get frustrated about. And I'm not sure I want to leave a record that suggests we are getting rid of 200 years of jurisprudence in the attempt to react to what we're seeing on the news these days. How are we getting rid of 200 years of jurisprudence. Well, if, if we leave any piece of this record as suggesting that we are repealing the language in justifiable homicide, that would be 1983 Joe. We don't know exactly what the 1983 provisions were at this moment in time. My concern is you have a very long history of common law, which has presented a jury with what is proportional under the circumstances, they have to listen to that and make a decision. And I know there's frustration about some police officers getting away with something they shouldn't have gotten away with. If we leave the record on voting with this that we're suggesting we're trying to repeal that ability of an officer to make a defense that is correctly proportional to what happened under the circumstances. No, what Matt is saying is if it is proportional there is a defense. Well, I agree with him 100% and I'm hoping to leave that as part of this record going forward. I think I think if you read s1 19 and s2 19 together. You would see a record of looking at proportionality in the use of force, and we're prohibiting in s2 19 a certain use of force that has been proven to be deadly, or provide or create serious bodily injury. We're not. So, I don't see is our commitment to continue to look at justifiable homicide statutes as being anything other than a serious need to update anything that in this day uses in our laws, terms like master, servant, and mistress as being something. You know that's akin to Vermont in 2020 versus Vermont in 1810. So I don't see a commitment to look at a law that's long overdue for a vision as being something that undoes a defense to anyone whether they be a law enforcement officer or a state senator or a citizen of the state of Vermont. Dick, I think you rightly pointed out that somewhere down the road a court will be looking back at this record decide what our intent was. I'm really saying that if I vote for this amendment and the bill itself. I am doing so with a clear understanding that we are not intending to repeal anything at this point in time. Whatever defenses have been traditionally raised can still be raised. I believe in the right for people to defend themselves. And can I just go ahead, you know. Well, I don't think I'm not sure what will happen when we look at the that justifiable homicide section but in my mind I have no intent to repeal it, but to update it. I mean I don't think that that is our intent right is to to repeal that at all but to look at what it means now and how it should be written and interpreted. On the universe. I'll go a step further though on the end of on the 50th anniversary of Kent State. We ought to be darn clear about your ability to shoot people because they are protesting. Yeah, yeah, I agree but I, I do think that if courts are looking at our intent and I think that we need to make it clear that our intent is not necessarily to repeal. But to re to look at it in terms of what we need now. I hope I have no intention to repeal that. I hope is that none of this ever happens. Yeah, that police officers will not use the prohibited restraints under any circumstances, and will not. We won't have serious bodily injury and death as a result. So, I'm ready to vote. Peggy, could you, the Senator Bruce amendment, could you please call the role, unless there's further discussion. Let me just ask Bryn, can I just ask Bryn something so brand. With regard to the issue of the officer and a person are in a fight over a gun. If the officer uses one of the prohibited restraints, he still has a defense. Oh, I think that's a that would be a pretty clear self defense case. Okay. Yes. Thank you. I just want to make sure this is draft 1.3 you're talking about right draft 1.3 as amended when the amendment would be to take out any reference to justifiable homicide in in S2 19. It will just be striking subdivision C in section five. Okay, adding intent language. Do you do like a new version that would be 1.4 that would have all the stuff or we're voting on 1.3. It'll be 2.1. So okay so we're going to vote on 2.1 not 1.3 correct. Correct. So, let me get this clear. In this version we're taking out the second amendment the second proposal of amendment right. Which refers to and we're revising the second proposal amendment. Take out the reference to the law on justifiable homicide. Right, but then you don't need this. It in there at all. Well, anyway, okay. Well, you need to take it out because in 2019 version that's on the floor. The whole second amendment is in the version that's on the floor. I don't know what's on the floor. So what, what we voted on Friday had a reference to 2305. Yes, this updated amendment would strike that reference in 219. As we passed it on Friday. Right. Okay. Everybody clear. Yes. Any further discussion. And I understand the technical difficulties and I hope that. The YouTube recording is running. It is. It is. Okay. So this. This is an amendment actually from all of us. Is there anyone who wants their name off the amendment, by the way? I will on it. On it off of it. It's already on. Everybody's on. Does anybody want to come on? You don't want to come on. But I'm a little bit disappointed. I don't know what to do.  That's the question. All right. If he would please call the roll. Yes. Senator white. Yes. Senator Barouth. Yes. Senator Benning. Yes. Senator Nica. Yes. Senator Sears. Yes. So. John Blumer will be in tomorrow's calendar when we report S-119 and S-219. Senator Bruce will report 219. I'm reporting 119. I don't know who comes first. I don't know who that matters. Whoever is on second. I knew you were going to say that. I knew you were going to say that. They're on third. So we'll see you all later this afternoon I guess. So do we have a session at 3.30? Yes, today. And it's going to go forever. Could we get a copy of the amendment that we just did please? Yes. I'll send it to all of you right now. Thank you, Brynne. Brynne's already written. Brynne's so far ahead of us. Okay. And we're meeting. Thank you for your counsel. Thank you, Matt. We're meeting time off for a two-hour dentist appointment. Oh no. Oh my god. Right now. We're on tomorrow at 10.30, right? 10.30 or 15 minutes after floor ends. Okay. I'm not, you know, we're not sure how long we'll go on. We've only got Eric as a witness. So hopefully he can sit at home and rest until we're available. Thank you. We're taking up the deeds issue. And I'm sure you're all looking forward to hearing from the St. Albans probate bar, which is on Wednesday. And Joe will be prepared. May I ask you a question, Senator Sears? Did you hear back from the House at all about the rape kit testing? I have not. But I have heard the good news is that the House Judiciary and Health Institutions Committees have agreed with our amendments to F-338, so it'll be on its way to the governor. Oh good. Great. Good. Thank you. Yeah. No, that's really good. I mean, that's an important bill. Yeah. That Brynne take a deep bow on that one for all the drafting and work you did on that. It is true beginning, you know, it's really important of the justice reforms that we can do in terms of the criminal justice system. That's great. So good work, everybody. Yep. All right. I've been in now. Thank you. See you.


Collaborations and conferences like this allow us to all just kind of come together just share our knowledge and experience and start building that trust. When somebody's struggling with something and you're comfortable with them kind of leaning over your shoulder, you kind of see where their mind goes showing that aha moment almost when they discover something. They thought of something or they never thought of it this way. I think there was a lot of that happening during this course and I think that will drive more engagements like this and to engage us to be more communicative when it comes to this when it comes to security. I will use all the tools and applications we covered in this engagement to better our network systems. At this time and with the speed technology is advancing and developing, cyber attacks are more frequent and sophisticated so it is necessary to get more knowledge on how to fight cyber attacks. I think that this type of event is necessary for two reasons. The first one is about the cyber threat, a very important threat today. And the second one is the fact that it's a really good opportunity to work with American and Gibushan army forces. The cyber protection team did a very good job and the JSX-2 with a lot of translators and everything was perfect. This is an easy one for everybody to take a week away from their day-to-day work and to really talk about skill sets and really talk about cultivating a culture when it comes to security. Not necessarily just how we do it but how do they do it and then uplift each other. Several times I've been doing IT security for almost 16 years and there were several times in the class that somebody that just thought for the first time showed me something. There's never a shortage of knowledge, you're never going to learn everything and unless we do more conferences like this you're really never going to know what you don't know.


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here So this will be my spoiler free review for Edgar Wright's last night in Soho last night in Soho again is directed by Edgar right who also co-wrote the script along Along with Christie Wilson and it stars Thomas and McKenzie on a Taylor joy Matt Smith Tarrant stamp Michael Ayo Diana rig Rita touching him and Margaret Nolan so This movie revolves around Eloise who goes as Ellie portrayed by Thomas Thomas and McKenzie She is a student with a passion for fashion design and she also has this ability to see see go So I guess you can say she has the sixth sense She finds herself transported back in time to 1966 London in the body of an iconic nightclub singer of the era named Sandy While in Sandy's body Ellie begins a romantic relationship But she begins to realize that Sandy's life in the sweetened 60s is not as glamorous as it appears to be in Both past and present begin to fall apart with horrifying consequences now This movie has a lot to say about individuality so We learned very early on that Eloise is this aspiring fashion designer. She wants to go to London to go to school She feels like she has something to prove because of because of some other familial Trauma that she is dealing with also throughout the film and we see that she's very much reserved She doesn't seem to have that much. She has confidence that she can prove Something as relates to completing this education in London for her dream of being a fashion designer, but she's not very confident in terms of her Social social environments and she's very much to herself She doesn't really stand up for herself when faced with confrontation from individuals who are kind of stepping all over her in ways as we're shown throughout the film and then when she is Teleported essentially into this world of the 1960s with this Former night singer or nightclub singer Sandy who is portrayed brilliantly by Anya Taylor-Joy. It's just like a very a Very interesting contrast that unfolds throughout the film early on where we're seeing that Sandy has the confidence and the swagger and just all the stuff that Eloise wish she had she's confident. She knows how to she knows the moves. She needs to make to get what she wants and then You know early on after these dreams of hers. I'll just say start happening She starts dressing like her she starts trying to imitate her But then of course as the dreams progress and progress she learns that Sandy ended up in a very Dark place in London and she doesn't want to end up like Sandy and it's it turns into this very intriguing murder mystery along the way Edgar Wright does a very good job at setting you up with this protagonist who is very easy to get behind Eloise She is very sympathetic. She has again this trauma that she's dealing with me being a screen fan I would say she definitely has some Sydney Prescott vibes that I was really just into Right off the bat from learning what we did about the character very early on to just seen how it progressed and seen How she was seeing that reserveness and Thomas Thomas and Mackenzie of course embodying that soul so well in this role Thomas and Mackenzie. She is amazing here. She's very convincing there She's kind of plays the the same character in a lot of her roles But with here you see a different side of her acting chops when we started to dig deeper into the mentality of Eloise and this This mental deterioration that she starts to go on after digging even deeper into what happened to Sandy in the 60s Since she also has this obsession and this love and passion for the 60s She feels like the 60s were one of was one of the greatest eras in in history So of course knowing what happened to Sandy and learning what happened to Sandy that kind of course warps her perception of the 60s Even more tonight kind of like also a Reference to these old saying the grass is always greener on the other side. Everything is always how it appears to be on the surface So going back to Anya Taylor-Joy. She is breathtaking here She is mesmerizing as this nightclub singer named Sandy who was ultimately just mistreated in the 60s You do learn a lot of what happened and what went on the film's themes of abuse trauma and again Individuality they ring true while you're exploring what happened to Sandy and as you're seeing the progression of Eloise finding her own confidence throughout this trauma that she's not only dealing with on her own But then seeing the trauma that Sandy endured in the 60s. So Outside of that, you do have some amazing shots throughout this movie There are some of the use of the mirrors and the reflections and just the duality of it all the way everything is bleeding into each other Edgar Wright is just on his best. He's he's at his best in this film. I wouldn't say this is like his best work ever I am a big Sean the dead fan. I've seen his other movies like Scott Pilgrim versus the world and his other works But here he really just is tapping into the horror elements And he's doing it quite well I will say that some of them could have been more impactful in the sense that they weren't really that terrifying But I was still mesmerized and I found myself Teleported into the roaring 60s and just everything on your screen is just beautiful visually the cinematography the neon lightings of red green everything just these vibrant colors that really just hone in on Getting you as the viewer fixed in on all the events unfolding on your screen And then Steven Price's score kind of also transcends over certain things unfolding on your screen Amplifying them making you really feel the terror that Eloise feels at times because this movie does have some genuinely terrifying moments I would say that are again well executed. Thanks to Edgar Wright's brilliant direction and You just are this movie is a blast. I had a blast with this movie I wouldn't say it is the neatest in terms of the last act because there are some little tidbits of details that Happened throughout the first two acts that kind of let you know what happened to Sandy. What's actually going on here with between her and Eloise? You kind of get hints of that throughout the first two acts and I'll just I'll say that because I didn't really pick up on those Up until the third act came and we got those major twists now It's with these major twists that you okay while the twisters I would say adequate you you are at the same time kind of undoing a lot of the things that you're exploring about I would say toxic masculinity Generational trauma not generational trauma just trauma in general general when it relates to an individual and Just kind of undoing this kind of like feminist narrative that you're trying to Portray I would just say it's still overall a very well done film But towards the end it does kind of undo a lot of its own themes and certain character choices aren't that Believable either it's very bizarre how the movie decides to wrap itself up satisfying still captivating Hell of a good time, but just not the neatest not the neatest Edgar Wright again. He knocked it out of the park here I hope we see more of this from him in the future because just because I love this movie I'll give it a 7 out of 10 But if you haven't already of course make sure you subscribe turn on postification in this video in the description I have links my social media accounts on my Facebook Twitter and Instagram You can message me there of course Any movies news or views like me to cover in the future and with all that in mind guys, I will see you in the next video


you walk straight to your classes so that door is the critical point for you where you are changing your behaviour R-School R-School R-School R-School R-School R-School Which direction it will be? Right or left? Okay, third observation what we made that here we have some reddish-brown precipitate forms Why reddish-brown precipitate forms? That? Same thing Here I have a burning pan I just have to take a glass and then let it out 1 by 15 into 9 into 6 Solve it please quickly 6 15 1 by But if you see it will take a weak acid let's say acetic acid Okay and to take a weak base let's say NH4-OH Again Okay it can be salt as well as it can be sugar So if we want to observe the diffusion process in them It's not anything We are just trying to solve general problems Another model of puzzles we need If you put this question I got one wrong answer If you put option C you will get 4 ups So the leader board let's see who did the who got the fastest finger Okay So here is Varsha Varsha is the fastest among all So he-she comes on the top of the list Okay 3 then 1 second forward 2 times up and here is the answer High dancer wall


How's it going everybody force and jk we're ripping Sunday fund a NFL weeks three and four regular season 40 bucks mixer madness It has been some madness tonight. Oh, this is the top portion of the results. There's a link in chat You can find him anytime at lane sports cards calm and a stroll down on the moment here so you can see the rest Do that now There's like the legacy and score base don't ship I think everything else does is in the description I'll check that before we get ripping here. Oh, yeah. Good luck y'all Here's that results link again. You can see it. We've been talking about Kenny powers a lot, so Might have faded away So yeah, regular base doesn't ship in legacy and scored everything else will ship Dude Jake is going on with this this I gotta think of another one from this car the van ride and There's not I mean we could go on and on but let's do let's do the score legacy first It's those are the base heavy ones in the base doesn't ship skos That's the heads are falling off One legacy one score 23 on these Give them time give them time. Oh Dude is this the Justin Fields and Zach Wilson redemption weekend? There's only one Paul in the break. So whichever Paul Yeah, Paul D is dolphins Yep, Paul D is dolphins. All right, I'm gonna skip past all this base This doesn't ship and it's just just vet stuff anyway. All the inserts will It's all rookie base It doesn't change the fact that he had a good game Spencer Sam LaPorta on the rookie auto for the Lions first hit going to the Lions rookie Osiris Torrance to 100 We've came across a car this morning should be before I don't remember what we do with it. Thank you Bill's why does he not have a logo? Must have been like UDFA Yeah Interesting. I've never heard that name before to be fair Yeah, I'm not saying I trust them I'm just saying it a good game guys geez dude You say one guy has a good game like put this put that put this put that rookie auto J for the Packers No one says one of the homeless has a good game, but he's got Travis Kelsey to throw it to Who's got Andy Reed coaching him got Micah Parsons number to 100 for Dallas Optimism is not allowed Jake. No, no Nope, what did you throw a pick or something got mims on the scorecard Zay flowers on the rookie auto for the Ravens Flowers That's for you. I wonder if I wonder if Roger's helping out at all I'll come on the snap Ronnie Bell On the rookie to 35 for San Francisco. He's there. What are I see for three? I think it is him He's a third receiver, right? CMC acted as a third receiver is like the second receiver today Christian Watson is to 35 on the breakthrough for the Packers Noah Sewell Isaiah Hodgins on the road on the auto for the Giants not rookie He's been around a while actually Legacy now Wasca dealer Silver rookie is Nolan Smith on the mini Price prospects of Addison Silver rookie Brian Branch. It was interesting What's going on? They did like a toy story like Oh, I saw some stills of that looks pretty bad Yeah, they were like so it was like live time Kyler to 150 for the card like live-time animation, right? Yeah, it's only couple minutes behind which is honestly kind of insane Like that's pretty bizarre to think about Well, they said they were they were they were like testing it today, right? It was like a it was like a trial run for like an actual thing. They're gonna do 2049 rushy rice for Kyoto.  They're trying to get the kids to watch dude What's they're trying to do that kid of dominance Michael Irvin to watch the actual game? Watch Bailey's happy cook Well, no one's gonna be watching that got to 100 Russell Wilson Broncos. Wait, who do you play next week? It might happen potentially Trial run for Skynet God under the lights Josh Downs culture committee terminators out of 20 Yeah, Jake Terminator is real Parker Washington he's played bad puka TV appears to 299 for the Texans I mean in his part the entire like nobody on the Patriots offense played good nobody How would he pot no 400 points right up to everybody at the ends Reach I can't even do his voice. I don't think I can either What kind of what kind of rap what kind of wormhole rabbit hole every down What is that? What is that? What is this? That is a oh the nice one. Thanks to you 49 Alex Smith and ironers and the next one is a Bryce young Number to 25 Panthers that's legacy hit there and then another numbered card Mike Evans to 149 for the Bucks. I guess Select draft come on man. Come on man From the Super Bowl have what do you say let him cook? Let him cook buzz CJ Stroud This I don't even like him dude see Liam Silver got red Nick Chubb Jake thought so Tom Hanks has let him cook real loud the 149 Nick Chubb for the Browns tri-color Kittle you It's a 199 Niners Xavier Hutchinson Texans rookie Otto He's young got Smith and Jigba Silver. Yeah, there's one thing that right so he's improved on like Bad, it's that I don't other other than that. I don't know like Like that team is also not great silver rookie Stroud Yeah, that's the one thing he's got to get better at is like getting rid of the football But like better awareness. I think he should he should grow with it But I don't know I feel like you should already have some you should already have that to an extent Smith and Jigba rookie on the On the hyper and an orange Rathaus burger 49 Henry to oh to oh No Henry to oh to oh Just he is an embarrassment. That's he's pretty solid for the most part. They're pretty solid He is a Texan Henry to oh to you to you Said Travis down there somewhere Through it. God silver Etienne There's a Christian Watson red for Green Bay. That's to 149 Jonathan Taylor tri-color to 199 for the Colts Ronnie Bell on the Niners rookie Otto and Silver Sensation's Quentin Johnston Stroud there not the best box of prison. I'll just like trap now I don't like probably the bottom but to prism drafts Come on prism draft You wait to improve until I've actually it probably won't be immediate anyway, Spencer. So yeah There's no way they're gonna call interference on that. There's no way silver rookie Derek Hall Quinn Ewers Rated prospect on card autograph Big card random to everybody at the end of this break Wayne's boy On card yours. I guess it was a hold though Got a red burrow for the bangles the 299 Betis on the snakeskin for the Steelers I think that's a bad call to receiver wouldn't even looking dude.   He's a saint currently. Yeah You go black and gold Palomarie blue wave number to 249 for the Cardinals Kendra Miller Saints red wave rookie. I wouldn't be happy either He's got bailed out That's a pretty terrible call man Quatoriano on the auto for the Texans that's That's like the game too at this point.  For the Steelers They did get the Swift script a Hey Colby wooden auto, I think wooden is a packer I'm gonna check that one Colby wooden. I think he's a packer. I feel you Riley. I feel you Yep packers on the Colby wooden Blue wave is rookie tank bakes me for the Jags to 49 Purple ice to Han Dotson commanders to 149 silver Michael Pittman To 99 is a Jake Moody rookie auto for the Niners signing day auto rather Everybody's against you Anthony Rookie red is Trey Palmer to 299 Red wave mark Andrews I find Trey Palmer real quick Tampa All right, Jake. Come on. Oh Trey Paul the goat Okay. Yeah, flawless will be the last box Richardson silver for the Colts. We got a auto 2335 Anthony Richardson Blue ice color match for well college and pros That's a thick sleeve. That's not gonna work Congrats to the Colts Beauty oh love that that's a gorgeous card Not I hate the Gators, but that's gorgeous. There you go Peter a a r5 Fire purple ice Ronnie Bell rookie for the Niners to 149 de hop for the Titans. Yeah She feels weird to say I think That poor guy went to the get one to the Titans They must think how much how much more money do they give into the next that's hostess team I guess it's worth it then Jaguars Parker Washington Silver Auto Blue wave rookie puka nice puka to 49 rams. It's a stud Quentin Johnson rookie red wave chiefs wins rigged a Jordan Mason hyper auto Jordan Mason. I know it's bugging me that I don't know it This one's bugging me Niners It's not though. I should have known that silver hainer a De Mario Douglas on the auto I keep I think I think I keep reaching for the I forgot I ran out Patriots right tomorrow Douglas. Oh, yeah, Patriots blue wave Mac Jones for the Pats Number to 249 red Michael Pittman jr. Colts 299 But shake goes been awesome Best teams player offense so far today Silver Olave Stephen Jones jr. Auto Titans on the Stephen Jones jr. Purple eyes Earl Campbell goes to the Titans via the Oilers 249, I think you also did it for play for the Titans. We're just Oilers anyway, red wave Herbert and Leaf jumbo now Leaf metal jumbo I think they might be Then they probably feel good about playing defense against Zach Wilson and runs the block down here Alright, here we go with a cool man Dwayne McBride.  It's like a football texture one of five And it's not the actual texture but Here comes the boom sauce gardener auto one of two Low number with a jersey number there for the Jets Redemption here for the Patriots Christian Gonzalez Card level including parallels awarded at time of fulfillment for the Pats Chargers on the Dugan savage auto one of ten and a Jordan Addison first-round bound of Vikings auto Seven of seven nice card there and this is actually really nice one of one Prismatic gold Hinden Hooker encased auto pre-production proof Lions that's pretty cool Gold pre-production proof one-of-one Hinden Hooker. What are we on to now? Don Russ elite 123 Don Russ elites cut it twice Will Anderson rookie for the Texans here to 399. Yeah, Brett really was Jake like that one Jake is admiring that hooker 75 spellbound Justin Jefferson for the Vikings I'm a fool. You see how the the letter is like yeah highlights what letter it is. I was like, oh, there's gonna be something on this card My god, man, what's wrong with that card? Yeah, it was I was legitimately like that life when I first saw that Spellbound at 349 as Hertz 40 Eagles Eagles and a goat bound Joseph Clifford Montana, Jr. Clifford Big red dog that's pretty cool short print on that one Clifford NFL strip riders got us good this week rookie leaders Jalen Hyatt Jalen Hyatt quarter-giants Jake Hain a rookie to 399 for the Saints Got a hand in Hooker Beach on Robinson a 999 rookie for the Falcons Rookie Otto Hinden Hooker to 249.  That's not you know, that's that's appropriate I just hope you pick something good You've already been seeing Bird Michael Mayor Brian Breeze C to 99 rookie for the Saints Rogers I'm just putting stuff there, dude Oh, there's no Swift. There she is. There's you Jake the Blake lively with her to 999 Peter Skronsky rookie for the Titans Is that we catch her cheating? Taylor Swift dude 249 Otto is Derek Stanley jr. For the Texans I'm serious. Is that Blake lively with her got Bryce young elitist rookie for the Panthers Now he gets to choose shady he used to choose rookie to 399 Riley Moss for the Broncos Brian Reynolds is there to burrow playmakers What to do now? I don't know. I Guess just writing illuminance that makes sense. I don't know Margo Why do we always quote a freaking Christmas movie? Is it too early to watch Christmas vacation? I don't think it is No, I'm gonna warm up and I'm gonna get ready. So as soon as after Thanksgiving I can have all the quotes ready to go I get them perfect. I mean, you already know really nice Xavier Hutchinson God Derek Henry to 150 for the Titans 250 points rand everybody at the end and a shroud dynamic, but I get it's New York Jalen Carter the one 75 Eagles Year one rookie Otto Josh Downs Colts something like unidentified fungus or something on the kids like lip or something like that Got a Luke Musgrave rookie out of the 100 Packers it really is drew so good I don't know how people think there's better like comedic Christmas movies in that It's a Leviss Rookie at 200 is Tank Dell for the Texans to 100 Quentin Johnston Chargers and 100 engage to Michael Parsons Graduates to Mike Parsons Says the card right there That's my Just sing them a song Yeah, I'm gonna I'm probably gonna watch that over the next couple days. I'll come back and just be quoting it Hands and hooker to 200. Okay. Let's we I am we're pulling a lot of hooker hooker card hooker cards tonight hooker cards your lions Redemption Darnell Washington Steelers Ricky luminance auto vertical Fred Claus Vince when Vince Vaughn is good, it's pretty it's pretty solid Look at that. Oh, that's sandwich sandwich. Look at sandwich corned beef or for strawberry or something. He looks fire What do you what? Hands and hooker that is a Michael Wilson Rookie to 50 for Zona Got my Michael mayor rookie out of 350 Raiders.  It's 150 Ricky Payne Durham for the Bucks Kendra Miller rookie year one autograph on card auto for the Saints That's a good part too the whole movie's funny Jersey card is Jets Garrett Wilson Ever seen Scrooge's actually and maybe I have Got to 175 Ricky Josh down for the Colts. Although it's scary movie time now because I just got to October with Bill Murray Justin Herbert the 250 for the Chargers and engaged TJ Watts for the Steelers 2021 gold standard I just I see it right there. We're gonna rip it. I'll make sure I cross it off the list 2021 gold standard 21, you know this side is Your muppet Christmas Carol is pretty fire too. I watched that once a year was it muppet Christmas Carol You want some muppets bro? You're laughing Guys if Jake was a muppet, which one would he be?  That's rude. It's not even close to true either Trail and tricky to 99 for the Niners Jefferson dual Jersey the two 99 Vikings Charizard. Oh, yes, the classic muppet More of a gonzo We should we should we should like tier-rank the muppets. No offense patch card to 49 for the Broncos I mean Rizzo is s tier that that's for sure No, not Anthony Rizzo the rat The beaker noise is on point. That's why I'm laughing so hard. I can't I can't look at Jake and he making the freaking noise I just can't do it Ricky Jackson on the golden age autograph for the Saints. You know beaker is It's almost like breaker Golden gloves on the auto is T Higgins to 99 bangles Two old men on the balcony. What are their names again? Waldorf and Statler, I think what the two guys that are on the balcony and arm out and a Kenneth gain well rookie dual patch auto to 49 for the Eagles Three auto box pretty solid got a number of Trevor Lawrence as well It's decent decent box Decent Decent I might do a next 22 optic team all that sounds good. Are you gonna be beaker for Halloween? Oh, I gotta figure out Halloween costume I gotta figure out one I can break in though because that's gonna be that's gonna be key Crystal Lave rated rookie Got a hollow Jonathan Allen a rated rookie Jaquan brisker For Chicago red stars Lamar Jackson for Ravens and a red stars rated rookie up here strong junior for the Pats Fuzzy bearer chef. That's pretty good. Sweetest chef is pretty fire salacious crumb. Oh boy. Oh, Jesus Thought we were so we were safe alright Let's go with Phoenix hobby hybrid from 2022 H2 Phoenix You fire him you didn't do a discount double check one time we fire them. Yeah valid Red Mike Williams chargers Mike will 225 hot routes Brandon cooks Flame door was corral Let's get let's get them likes coming in guys. Come on now. Come on. Come on. Got a fire and ice Maddie ice To 54 the Colts Wondale He was on crutches first of all got a red Rashad Bateman for the Ravens Number to 125 Ricky Viles Jones is happy there. You got an orange snoop Jags 75 Connor a golf. Oh, yeah four of five Kianta Ingram rookie auto for the Cardinals Four five it was Zona got a purple zone of a night for the Jets the rookie there number two nine and I geez Don't be doing that Fireforged the sheriff I hope over to ESPN I guess Highlights of something Green to Marvin leal rookie number to 25 Steelers Well, do you guys think Wilson earned like respect from his teammates and stuff and like you think that's that's a boost for him Maybe I don't know rookie rising Kenny Pickett. He did look good tonight. It wasn't perfect obviously, but much improved over what we've seen I mean Like this is like his last chance. He looks solid to 99 Bo Melton rookie for Seattle Kind of thwack with the third Seahawks plus that team that offense is just not that good like oh line stinks What do they have one good receiver? Yeah, I mean I look at him differently now after that game like He showed up. He hasn't shown up before he showed up. So I mean he's got a long ways to go But did what he had to do the night at least so there's that 22 Chronicles hobby Yeah, he definitely has to back it up, but I think that's like a that's a that's a boost I think to go against the Chiefs and you know Almost win that thing is pretty good. Oh geez Hawk. That sounds. Oh There's a card stuck there. There's a Derek Henry on the jersey card for the Titans. It's out of 199 But Chaco, he had a great game to 199 Chiefs your vision Ritter prism black Skymore Chiefs rookie number two 149. I mean Theoretically it's a ceiling, but we I don't know if we've seen his ceiling. I Don't know if that's a definite Traylon Burke's auto to 199 rookie for the Titans Joe Burrow to 199 for the Bengals It's possible that it was there's something that's a hundred percent. Yeah, the Holmes did look pretty bad today He had some awful like just awful like misreads and you just threw it like right to a defender So Berkey Kenneth Walker the third Seahawks Christian Watson on the Autograph for key to 99 for the Packers Do two autos or if you ought to Drake London for the Falcons London scored in London today. We got London on the track It's a 99 Rookie Olavae Saints, let's sell a box here Howl prison black? I'll do a 21 Chronicles hobby. Let's do that one 21 Chronicles hobby. All right, let's look at let's look ahead What uh, what's the what's the game tomorrow night again? Let's say this is kind of interesting Seahawks should win though, right pretty pretty pretty easily See if sake ones out again. I don't know if he's out. I Wanted to play doll of sake one rookie auto to 99 Javante Williams for Denver Yeah, I mean as long as the line helps him out I think they can they can just keep improving theoretically honey get a 99 for the commanders That's the that's the theoretically part, huh? Zach Wilson silver prison black rookie for the Jets a Holland to 99 Rookie for the Dolphins year Considered that yeah, I fear he was doubtful Lance Briggs bears auto to 25 Yeah, Jets at one and three. I just I just I don't know. I don't know plus AFC is tough I don't think the Jets do much this year But I honestly like going into the season, I don't think they'd be that great the problems Outside a quarterback are still the problems outside of the quarterback position even Rogers healthy. I don't I think they're like two and two at best Got Debo to 199 for the Niners Silver is an Ellinger for the Colts. I think they beat the Pats if they have Rogers though for sure Ron Dillmore purple to 199 rookie for the cardinals Chase Just look better than Patriots Jersey to 199 is Damian Harris Pats Okay, let's do some 22 select H2 and team all two of each team all's first Texas win the division. I don't know that division is weird That one feel strange Jags looked better today two and two Stroud looks really good to 99 Ricky pure strong junior. These are all gonna be sorry to 89 pure strong junior for the Pats Hey, see you Paul.  We'll see you. See you 89 Montgomery Bears and Lawrence 89 on the concourse Dragon scale. It's a good question. Oh Dario. I mean it deserves to be asked now That's you know, we've seen the Texas be pretty decent silver is Rogers. I still would think Jags take it I you got to be a little more trust there, I think but I Guess the fact that we're asking that through four weeks is Very good for the Texans a conqua rookie to 89 Titans Drake London on the club level rookie dragon scale to 89 Trayvon Walker rookie concourse for the Jaguars to 89 Arnold and silver Heinecky each two boxes now Lave Red is rookie as a you do To 49 giants stingly is it stingly or? Wait, yeah, right Silver concourse rookie is Ballinger for the Giants Rookie premier level Red Charles Cross Seahawks to 49. Yeah, be sure to like the stream everybody Put a like on a stream. We appreciate it concourse blue rookie is Khalil Shakir for the bills That one's out of 25 I don't know what Jake's gonna sing we get in 75 God see Higgins for the bangles Jake's gonna sing something. We're gonna get like copyrighted You're gonna get copyrighted from the Muppets He's making the beaker noise We do not ship the flawless boxes Ship them sealed our rookie premier level silver is Olava for the Saints sweet level blue miles Garrett for the Browns to 25 Ritter is a Silver lock it's sweet level red rookie is anger for the Cowboys to 49 red is Alvin Camara Saints Number to 49 come on select come on select a Mike Evans sweet level disco Let's do something like playbook boxes. I've got a couple of them. I think we'll do 22 and 2020 playbook 2022 playbook Yeah, pretty much true. Oh talk about down and dirty. That is a Big-time grass stain the 49 patch card Sutton Denver thing is filthy got an algea rookie auto it's a 99 for Atlanta Dane goal line grabs Giants to 199 one of the best collegiate running backs of all time Was just all right in the NFL Ron Dane Giants And the 249 Carson strong RPA book Eagles 2020 playbook Rookie jersey to 99 Joshua Kelly Chargers Falcons Jersey at 299 Calvin Ridley Jaguars rookie auto Levisca Chanel to 75 and Jerry Judy Broncos to 249 at rookie Jersey auto playbook 22 oranges. Oh look Patriots Cowboys highlights Oh, wait, yeah, it's just Bill Belichick with his hand on his face honestly Cowboys defense got to be one of the top scores in fantasy this year To 99 is Zeke for Dallas To 99 is AJ Dylan Packers Chubb base Kyle Hamilton rookie Drake London rookie patch card to 99 for the Falcons Eagles Carson strong rookie auto to 99 To Carson Strong's in to 222 and redemption Kyle Hamilton rookie jumbo Jersey autographs for the Ravens Let's get a box of us and big hits.  I mean that's the Chiefs dude Those great teams find a way even when the guy that makes it all happen is a is off To 499 rookie Drake London for the Falcons the steep James Cook Team Brady do that a bunch in his career. That's really Brady just Good coaches like that, you know Still find a way to get it done sometimes even if it's bad Kyle Hamilton Ravens on the rookie endorsements out of number 250 pick it Let's see I'll take Texas over the rays. I'll take Let me get Minnesota over Toronto, let's see Minnesota do it let's see Minnesota do it 399 is McCaffrey Panthers Malik Wilson 299 came cards for the Titans How does she feel better about the Texas? I don't know dropped over though, you know Nathan of Aldi. That's why I Bet I wish he was with Kenny pick at rookie Jersey for the Steelers. Yeah, I bet you wish he was game one starter Yeah, my name is Philly. I'll take Philly Arizona, Milwaukee. I will take Zona I think I think Zona. I think Zona Zona Zona I think that's the one that that that's the toughest one for me to predict. I think they're Plus they got gallon game one. So sauce rookie. There's Kirk Cousins to 299 for the Vikings Bucadelic DK, what about you, Mikey? You got Sorry for against the raise Jake. I would like to raise the win. I think Wanda Robinson Ricky Jersey for the Giants. I Don't like dislike the Rangers or the Texans, or I don't like the Rangers or Texans, so That's actually, you know, I mean Texas Rangers Rangers and Rangers and Rays. Yeah Rangers and Texans Ranger Texans This is a Sam Howell mystique to 399 for the commanders the Rangers and the Rays I don't want 75 Jamar Chase for the Bengals Anthony Munoz on the auto 5 of 10 for Cincinnati Philly, Milwaukee, Texas, Minnesota We're almost we're almost the same outside of the Milwaukee one. That is though. That is like the toughest one though to me Breeze Hall amazing You watch the top gun it's 499 Alvin Khmer for the Saints and Mystique rookie Garrett Wilson Jets number to 199 James Williams Lyons rookie auto to 199 got reinstated to come back early He's back. We go Lyons Matthew Stafford Two plates and patches Two boxes of 2023 plates and patches So come on Jake Jake I'm reporting you reported reported Got Jerry Judy got Quentin Nelson at 25 for the Colts Yeah, I think brave is one of all I think American League is a bit tougher I think I Think it's a little more wide open. I Think the Orioles make it though. They're they're very complete rookie auto to 75 as Marvin Mims Broncos Gabriel Davis auto to 149 for the Bills and rookie dual Jersey Michael Mayer to 50 for their Raiders I'm just glad that the postseason's here St. Brown base got mixing at 25 for the Bengals Like the one good part about their offense right now is mixing rookie auto Jake Hainer for the Saints out of 300 triple patch Is for the Broncos Patrick Schroetan the second the 99 and rookie auto over the Eagles Tanner McKee to 50 23 mosaic hobby. I don't want to think about that might that sounds scary They're literally gonna run into the issue of too many good young players and like certain positions. Oh I wish the Red Sox had that Got mosaic Ricky DJ Johnson for the Panthers Red rookie Mackay Blackman for the Vikings and silver audible burrow does both we're having play of experience So some some very little Thompson Robinson their purple Zay flowers the color match rookie Ravens nice Zay. That's 13 of 49 Silver Devontae Smith a blue mosaic moments in time Patrick Mahomes a second Which was the date you won last year's rule this, you know this calendar year Yeah, not a lot Adam But they got some they got some guys and then hooker debut with a Marvin Mims to 99 Broncos rookie auto Nice one Broncos mosaic Ozzie Newsom Browns red Watson Packers Moments in time Pat Pete Cardinals. Oh, we got it. Oh Pat. We got a top 10. Let's go. That's got a top 10 play Yeah, kind of Was a Christian Kirk Jags. He is pitched before yeah silver DJ more for the Broncos. I don't know why I said Broncos as bears DJ more As bears DJ more what's up inspire? Got mosaic Clinton Portis for the commanders their rookie orange 199 cart flips a third Balkans and mosaic is Daniel Jones for the Giants. I mean look at what happened when they call the young guy Yeah, seriously They were just done that earlier. They might have been alright at least made the posties in the wild card Okay, there's a red rookie Mims for the Broncos Silver rookie Maisie Smith Cowboys and silver splash Brock Purdy Niners No one was to go in this thing. There's a lot of boxes in this mixer. Jake. Why'd you put so many in here? All right mosaic Jalen Hyatt rookie for the Giants couple mosaic Deontay Johnson Number two ninety nine for the Steelers We were 50 points random to everybody at the end Red Fletcher Cox for the Eagles I can see that silver name it for the Jets if he takes less money than he wanted before One two three left Jets four five six right dolphins Go five will go right side on this one Silver montage McCaffrey Bryce young debut for the Panthers mosaic Herman Moore Lyons Michael Vic Falkins And I rolled it I for this one mosaic carbon copy Tony Pollard Aaron Jones one two three left four five six rights Five goes right side Packers Nice CJ Stroud NFL debut orange big card for Houston 88 of one ninety nine very nice that is sick Great stuff for Houston. We'll get that mag for you. Silver is Keenan Allen Chargers Last card made that box a very good box. Let's just roll right into mosaic choice. I guess actually wait That's the last 23 boxes. I'll save those 22 mosaic no huddle. That'd be a good move for the Yankees get Cody Bellinger Lefty he would hit a lot of Homer Homer's Yankees a deal I didn't even know that Yeah, they'd be the type of team to give him a deal he's gonna get good money to Silver James Rookie just goes up to catch eight thousands He's well he played in LA. I mean it's different, but he's played a big markets But it is different is different on the East Coast namely the Red Sox in babies a Blue disco warren moon Oilers go to the Titans. It's out of 75 Conor Wong Conor Wong Disco man of mastery Adams rookie or not that are not rookie but disco match Crosby Christian Watson on the rookie no huddle auto for the Packers mosaic von Miller bills be sure to light the stream everybody Helps us out. We would definitely appreciate it There's a Zabby there is Silver two up for the Dolphins. He's the next sacrifice behind the Patriots. Oh line Just go Joe Montana Sam Howell Snoop Conor purple rookie for the Jaguars Number to 50 Purple Jaguars causes like Charlotte Hornets This go Coraline Sutton Yeah, I don't think that would shock me either. Yeah, I'm kind of I'm kind of in line with that mic I agree Ohtani to the Dodgers Mets are gonna offer a ton of money though Purple McCaffrey now for the Panthers This one is also number to 50 43 50 Red Sox probably like top seven and odds Right Don't think Silver is Warren Moon for the Oilers one of the Texans rookie disco is Tolbert Cowboys Seyquan mosaic for the Giants Disco Ricky James and Williams for the Lions. That's the variation disco dynamic mad And blue disco is Ricky Johan Dotton for the Commanders to 75 let's do a 2020 Prism team on a 2020 elements prism team all Silver rookie Levisca Chanel the Jaguars there ready yellow Earl Thomas for the Ravens It's to 49 30 to a 49 Huntley and a Gibson elements now 2020 Getting there though. We're getting some high-end stuff pretty soon. We'll do the iMac collegiate after this Then limited then some of the the last few chrome boxes and then one and a case to NT and flawless 2020 elements. Let's go Lin Vowden jr. Raiders Ricky Palladium to 46 You know, yes, it is it is 12 o'clock JK Dobbins jersey card to 199 for the Ravens Darenson Evans to 125 Ricky neon signs for the Titans and Seahawks a Chris Carson auto not the best box there at all to 99 Chris Carson out of Seahawks Come on. We need something. We need something. Let's do iMac collegiate Two of these from 2023. Oh, that's pretty cool First I bet of the game is son Announced them that is sick got to 75 Justin Jefferson for the Vikings Jumbo Jersey Giants Ricky Jalen Hyatt to 99 everybody left dude everybody left or their lurking Rookie Auto Eagles Jalen Carter to 99 It's weird that his auto is like that on some of these stickers because on a lot of the newer stuff like it's actually signed out It's not just this lazy JC Strange Ricky Williams autograph that goes to Miami to 99 longest tenure is the Dolphins Goat college running backs right there Jonathan Mingo redemption immaculate introductions Panthers and a Zay flowers horizontal rookie patch out of 25 for the Ravens Yeah, Mike a lot happens today in the baseball world for sure Hey, Marino back into the 89 game, that's crazy for back then Disrespecting Marino will not be having any of it freaking good man Right, that is a Jamar chase to 75 for cincy Yeah, I did know that same straight at the whole draft to get Ricky Williams Dual patch to 25 is Jalen Carter and Trayvon Walker. That's pretty cool Uh, that is going to be an Eagles and Jaguars random at the end That chick filet bold patch maybe or something else. I don't know I can say random at the end on that one Darnell Washington auto to 49 for the Steelers I think it is too. I said something on an actual Georgia patch Trenton Simpson rookie auto to 99 for the Ravens Mike did get did that. That's who did it Redemption immaculate introductions Ruby Clark Phillips the third Falcons Here you go, Jake Broncos immaculate ink to 25 jersey number 15 of 25 Tim Tebow Nice Nice hit Broncos jersey number 15 of 25 college football royalty And an NFL player But Tebow and you definitely want Tebow and Gators jersey rather than something else Nice hit Denver sneaky nice hit there. I was not expecting that one 21 limited limited limited Yeah, pretty much Chris What a guy. Yeah, coach Doku was good at one point 600 points random to everybody at the end Davis Mills rookie Jersey auto to 99 for the Texans Shreem Elmer's bot to 149 T Higgins sincey And Devin Singletary dual patch with Josh Allen here to 49 For Buffalo Play action of materials four color and maybe almost four color. I think that that that is the blue there. I think so Accounts put on the board. Yeah, we can all start collegiate team Tebow and Ron Tain Oh, dude, that's the most annoying call ever Put on the ball. Yes. It's the worst. It'll literally do this the worst Yes, I can't stand it. I cannot hear in the video where you got mad No, and when they drop the ball to Tyler game in the night That's great. It's a great video Is that this year? No, it was a couple years back It's when they have what's his name on the team to 2023 choice mosaic choice silver Chandler Jones there mosaic there when thomas bills They jordan love auto nice hit packers Showtime signatures. I say brice young rookie red and yellow Carolina Two of 80 We'll get that magged for sure Got Jerome baddest number to 80 for the Steelers And herbert to 80 for the chargers Red and green rookie saints brian brissy and cowboys mazy smith. I've been waiting on that That gust of ac dude Ac need to be turned on dude. It's gonna get warm in here. Yeah. All right. Okay Dude, we're getting trolled by apple silver rookie, uh, devon a chant For the dolphins mosaic zave flowers debut For the ravens Ricky williams red and yellow auto for the charters That's chargers So i'll look at the next card. That's the dolphins ricky williams auto chargers though. Austin eckler black and green auto That's number to 25 Where you at rko? It's always 80 degrees here. It doesn't matter what time of year. It is always 80 degrees in florida Well, we got a black and gold First person ready yellow to 80 christian watson packers We're pulling black and golds like it's easy out of this stuff today And it is quitting williams jets Nice car there three of eight east Miles murphy rookie to 84 scentsy And red and green at collage.  That's the same Where did it? I was just singing Black and yellow Tri-color concourse cooper cup number to 249 for the la rams Silver ricky concourse dobs for green bay No way chris. No way We'd be sold out whatever person's we had in stock. That's for sure Silver dare kenry on the field level Say something right that sounds amazing 75 dalvin cook sparks jersey card vikings Silver concourse rookie scholar tomsen for the dolphins Silver concourse rookie trail on berks titans Oh raw that sounds amazing We won't get that until like january Silver sweet level is sequin barkley giants If that if that Tri-color premiere level russell wilson denver. This is out of 199 And a 30 is a kurt cousins autograph for the vikings No joe bro one of ones yet There's still time Silver concourse rookie emerson for the browns Red concourse is jamar chase to 99 bangles silver terry davis price To 75 is pier strong jr. Rookie jersey auto new england orange concourse rookie cameron dicker for the chargers to 49 Jake I know what you're thinking right now. Don't even silver ron dalmore Say manuel moyer No, don't even say it silver slab trash alien hurts for the uh ryan The uh eagles air amari cooper what ryan last thing got ridder. There's a Concourse rookie blue is jacquan brisker for the for the uh the bears to 199 gary wilson Silver premiere level trevor lorenz Let's go to panini one and then we'll do encased 222 panini one and then encased from the same year It's all 2022 from here on out ron rogers one-man show autograph three of five green bay. There we go Great hit for the packers spots And a once upon a time autograph is a jake plumber for the broncos number 12 of 99 Did the new jake from save farm was at the he was commander's man Uh-huh They Yeah, you know Very sanders demo patch to 50 for the For the lions be sure to like the stream everybody like it up like it up packers have had a pretty solid break They fit here and there for the most part whole time Eric is a conma quad patch to 50 rookie for the dolphins Guys all over the place rko and cardinals tray mc bride on the auto to 99 rookie auto Patch auto packers charles woodson 7 of 20 Packers again here legendary swatch signatures nz hobby I don't even know what you're doing anymore, dude People probably just what tuned in there. They saw that Like i'm out of here. I'm leaving like you're here for two seconds They they unlike it Unlike the stream and leave make sure you like the stream guys Make sure to subscribe follow us on nattox live 62 likes. Oh my god. We're 13 away 13 away. Let's get to 75. Let's get to 75 mock ing bird Yeah, yeah Got a jim auto to 99 for the erratas Dining from the wild thornberries no beaker from that's a good one. No No beaker from the muppets God shag thompson the 25 for the panthers That's what i'm saying preacher. You don't like dining for the wild thornberries. I've never even heard of that You've never seen the wild thornberries Oh Chris jones gained gear to 99 for the chiefs Yeah, yeah on the water gets it Yeah, I see enough said gets it. That was pretty spot on donny. I'm not gonna lie Tonight night chris jones gave you shares it for the chiefs give me a second Dual patch rookie six of tan desmond ridder and alec pierce a couple of collegiate teammates there That'll be a random at the end You know what e t-shirt for extra terrestrial entertainment entertainment tonight or whatever It's a 49 jersey miles garret for the browns Extra terrestrial. I always get small. All right rob. All right rob dual jersey to 99 kenny picket ricky steelers You're gonna Lions ricky autos malcom rodriguez the 25 for the lions. That's a pretty good one though.  All right. Come on now jersey auto for the rams is henry ellerton 99 Cross over rpa for the ravens to 99 is kyle hamilton and desmond ridder nfl gear patch and bull rookie auto to 99 falcons Nice hit falcons He's been inconsistent this year. He needs to Get that consistency down. Come on ridder. Come on ridder. We're gonna get that nag for the falcons Foodle I like photos Foodle Yeah E t stands we're gonna say it out loud Jake just reads everything and chat out loud. He's gonna get banned by doing that Just doesn't says extra test evil. Come on, jake. This kid laughs at everything man. He laughs at his own shadow You got a uh stars and stripes joe burrow out of 13 for the bangles joe burrow followed by a tom brady Superbowl immortality 13 of 25 for the patriots 34 where they beat the eagles Nice brady for the pats ricky dual jersey to 49 is commanders brian robinson jr Patch card to 25 dk metcalf seattle Why are you doing the beaker noise and you're looking up a brady card? Ricky dual pass to 35 is drake london falcons Jersey card to 49 a seth joiner for the eagles That would be a sick car for brady design Wearing used to join Joiner and noir Joiner hardly noir All right rookie auto troy anerson at 49 falcons juicy rob Packers autograph is jordy nelson to 99. I think so dual jersey to 99 is rookie erikizu kama dolphins that one Look at your mind. Good job, jake. Let's go. Good job, jake Stars and stripes rpa giants wandale robinson 24 of 25 The giants color match on the stars and stripes. We'll get this bagged for you new york giants Awesome hit for that spot wr wandale robinson Or wide receiver all right Let's see A monster right here right now 22 flawless hobby Again group rickshires zoom at 10 a.m. Eastern with sam everybody Baseball is hockey tomorrow or those hockey Wednesday, I should say panini black football is the uh the release on wednesday We're gonna have a decent amount of it ripping that day But not a ton of it So keep an eye out we'll do some mixtures with black football as well always a fun product to rip Always always always That was terrible news to get Patch card to 20 is ricky romeo dob's packers Yeah, the way the way field news was That was tough, dude rookie quad patch to 20 is aiden hutch and center for the lions That's what i'm saying rk. I was saying that earlier I hate curt schilling so much. Is there anything good about curt schilling in 2023? Yeah, there really isn't anyway Eli manning dual patch auto 17 to 25 giants Giants is some very nice hits at the end here. There we go with the on-card sweet elie in the mag Ruby rookie auto 14 of 20 kyle pits falcons There you go falcons ruby 14 of 20 on the auto That is rookie auto by the way Is a 2021 card brian robbins in jr. A rookie patch auto 7 of 24 Washington Oh, that's nice looking five of only six on the greats auto john elway super clean elway That sapphire color match almost matches perfectly that uh that older broncos blue That's what i'm saying freak kyle pits, dude get that guy on a team that's going to throw him the ball I won't be selfish and having to go to the patriots and the same thing happens to him What would you throw the ball to the tight end to be fair to be fair Very nice. I will get that mad alex pier 17 of 20 on the rpa for the cults All right solid interbox. Let's see what we got in the uh encased cards the last few cards of the break here Got a daniel jones emerald gem four five for the giants diamond guarantee Drew b sapphire gem four 15 for the saints Dude him and goddard together on the same team would be crazy rko though goddard and kyle pits together on the field That would be dangerous You could have this guy throw into him Jalen hurts eagles on the uh framed signatures Nice birds 10 of 20 very nice I think it's the first hurt so i pulled that applause this year. We've we're with a good bit of it too Congrats eagles eagles Eagles with the awesome vet hit To end the break you have several randoms to do here several you have four total i think Is there a whole thing? They got moved then i they got moved then i guess They got moved somewhere there was a whole bunch i know Couldn't have gone far But thanks for joining everybody not the best sunday funny mixer, but there was some very nice hits some teams did well I think but some of those boxes weren't the best unfortunately okay The first random is to everybody. There are four points cards the top four In the random we'll get them the top spot gets 600 second spot gets 400 spots three and four get 250 each after that we have The dual relic eagles jags here jalen carter and trayvon walker from iMac collegiate After that we have falcons colts dual patch from nt dezen ritter and alec pierce collegiate teammates and then to everybody Is a rated prospect auto of quinn ewers on card Good luck on that one y'all Looking like he might be a he'd probably be a first rounder right? patriots that did honestly honestly i mean We'll go four times You probably not have to trade up all the way into the top five to get him to Maybe maybe we'll see four four on everything here first one is points top four after four one two three and four uh eagles Get the 600 seahawks get the 400 and packers and broncos each get 250 next up One two three and four the jaguars are going to get the dual georgia d lineman patch card from iMac jaguars The pierce and ritter one two three And four the falcons get that one the ritter and pierce And the ewers good luck one two three and four the rams Let's do a recap now And then that'll be it for tonight everybody The last thing we'll do is just recap here 10 a.m. Start time with sam in the morning make sure you guys get your spots Breaks are listed through wednesday. All right start the recap here with that nice tom braided 25 for the pats Superbowl immortality Watson at 35 ronnie bell. This is all the numbers though. That's okay Um, no, it's not Parsons and torrents. Now. We've got it's relics of pits uh Pollard gary wilson feeling in jettas Noah phantz Derek henry demian harris down and dirty with the grass stain on it is a courtland Sutton Bradley there for the falcons Yeah, Drew. Sorry was a tougher one for you She moments bot joshua kelly drake london kenny pickett wandale robinson patrick shirt and the second michael mayer jk dobbins jalen hyatt a allen and single terry dualpatch dobbin cook a berry sanders erica zucanma christ jones someone's game used He's a conma kenny pickett's brian robinson jr. Seth joiner miles garret's drake london dk metcalf romeo dobs and in hudginson Keep going with the autos here God and isiah hodgins ze flowers sam la porta jaden reed rushy rice Xavier hudginson henry to oto Ronnie bell tegon quatoriano colby wooden demario douglas steven jones jr parker washington jordan mason jake moody jamal williams the five christian gonzalez leaf redemption max duggan a jordan adison clayton toon cedric tilman jerry judy That is dewayne mcbride cameron peoples sauce gardener hendon hooker derek stingley jr Steelers drawn out of washington ricky lumen inside a vertical redemption kendre miller josh downs michael mayer luke musgrave a t higgins ricky jackson kenneth gainwell chiante ingram that was the five by the way kind of unassuming but yeah it's the five drake london treylon berks christian watson jabonte williams lance briggs a ron dan for the giants tyler algear leviscus chanalt ravens redemption kyle hamilton ricky jumbo jersey autograph from origins karson strong james and williams kyle hamilton anthony moonyos jake heiner gabriel davis marvin mims tanner mckay marvin mims and christian watson rotto is here of darin's and evans chris karson cart Phillips the third redemption for the falcons panthers mingo redemption immaculate introductions from imac collegiate ricky williams jailen carter trinton simpson darnel washington zay flowers tim tebow is a nice one 15 of 25 jersey number goes to denver davis mills jordan love denver actually had a pretty solid break here ricky williams again austin eckler to 25 pier strong jr curt cousins a tray mcbride henry ellard jordy nelson kyle hamilton troy anderson malcom rodriguez kyle pits alex pierce brine robinson jr i'm seriously wondering that right now jay why are you looking at me like that who closed the door dude this is not this is not real uh you're right i it's a fever dream jerry judy on the uh relic auto book and karson strong why is the door closed i don't know weren't you here the whole time dude and uh hand and hooker on the pre-production proof one of one everybody was going crazy over that hooker um jake plumber wants to find a time for the broncos to 99 a trawls whatson patch auto for the packers erin rogers on the auto for the packers to five 25 queen of yours went to the rams again in the random jaylin herds 1020 out of flawless we had gems of breeze and daniel jones elway to six on the greats auto the broncos dual patch auto elida 25 for the giants wandel robinson giants stars stripes rpa to 25 orange shroud nfl debut to 199 texans you're looking very good so far this year red and yellow ricky brice young to to 80 for the panthers dual relic ricky auto to 99 falcons desmond ridder out of nt and a drapik sainters uh number 35 is richardson for the colts 2023 quarterbacks all hit there that will do it thanks again everybody


What's going on everyone Sam here late in sports cards? We are doing 21 22 pinning me one one in one basketball Hobby 10 box full case break number 28 tiered random team style. Here's a look again at your random results As always you can find these on the website under the results tab as well as the link in chat. Let's do it Good luck everybody. Let's keep it going. That's what I'm saying. That's the only thing. We're missing is a one-of-one Until right now. Yeah, you did call it Ken We've got Cory Kispert 10 out of 25 for the Wizards tier 2 hit for carry him on the purple and then we've got Mike Conley 35 out of 35 going to Utah Jefferson L on the tier 2 that's pretty cool man game worn Mike Conley. They're actually having a surprisingly good year of the jazz I know everybody wrote them off Vaughn saying Celtics one-to-one in this case. I Hope so Vaughn that'd be kind of cool man One-to-one Tatum timeless moments. We've got nice Alfred Shengun 10 out of 30 Nice one there Congrats Rockets. God. That's terrifying the Rockets Clyde Drexler. Nice 15 out of 35 Congrats Houston Eric R Game use Clyde the Glide Congrats buddy I think only one sneaker spotlight and it was Chris Paul. Yeah, Chris Paul was the only one so far tonight Till this case we pull the one-of-one Chris LeBron sneaker spotlight We've got five out of 30 That's gonna be a Kevin Porter, Jr. For the Rockets KPJ. We're now that's nine out of 30 Another Jalen Green two out of 35. I think we pulled the one out of 35 the last There you go Houston Eric R having a break right now two color two color on the Jalen Nice one there Fold two thirty-fifths of this card entire run Very true nice Jalen Congrats on that Eric Another one dude This time going to Steve S Lamello ball town town Boo That's so cool man all the hornets with the crown for the Queen City Oh, that's awesome man. Congrats on the Lamello Steve S Dude, that's nasty That's so nasty Such a cool one man such a good design all the little bees flying around On Random Random check yeah, this is Celtics Robert Parrish 99 of 99 this is getting a little out of hand Too many bangers time for the Roy check He's uh, he's doing something over here going ham and going ham that's sick the chief That's one there for the sea Celtics by the way is tongue shing see Got going to the Nuggets Michael Porter jr. It's 27 out of 30 This is just getting absurd man. Nice one there for Denver Keith B and Then we've got Prime RPA Davion Mitchell 45 out of 49 Go into the Kings nice tier two on that one Eric are Eric doing very well corked bat pine tar spider tack all over my hands Been outside recently. Yeah, how is it? It's picking up picking up We've got to go into the thunder Three of 30 Aaron Wiggins Nice one there thunder Jefferson L. I'd be sipping from that spider-man water That'd be Sean Sean would have had to lent it to me. No for that to be the case Timeless we know it's not timeless. Oh, just kidding. It's Jalen Johnson 24 out of 35 whoops False alarm Keith be nice Jalen Johnson 24 out of 35 Just let everybody astray right there run a muck and flat out deceived big time big time Who out of 15 Luca Donchich? Nice one there Congrats Mavs Dallas carry M Heck yeah, that's awesome. Never gonna be upset about a Luca Four shadowing. I hope so man rookie Wizards is gonna be Corey Kisfer one out of 35 Nice one there Washington that's gonna be a carry M again Nice Kisbert a lot of Corey Kisfer tonight for sure Another one going back to Denver that is gonna be Michael Porter Jr. 11 out of 15 Nice one there again Keith with Denver When I get the wizards in select Got 35 of 35 that's so nasty four colored RPA Franz Wagner Peter M The nice little a purple foil on that one book and two boxes to go 21 out of 99 is gonna be a shrey man Going to the Thunder you've got 71 out of 99 Isaiah Jackson on the rookie Jersey auto And not even using them Something big in this last five still a good case. So I have to say Jalen Green early on Franz Lamello downtown Definitely some good stuff with another one Luca Donchich This time 68 out of 99 sticky fingers Kayla Going to carry with the maps and then last a card of the break Corey Kisfer 22 out of 49 going to carry and again Three colored RPA Congrats on that with a prime Blue foil color match very nice That'll do for the break guys. Thanks again for the fill still got one more one in one case. So sit tight