Let's see how an air partial initially at rest achieves geostrophic balance. At rest, the air parcel velocity equals zero, and the only horizontal force acting on the parcel is the pressure gradient force, which has a constant magnitude and direction as long as the pressure gradient remains the same. As soon as the parcel has some velocity, the Coriolis force starts perpendicular into the right of velocity in the northern hemisphere. The Coriolis force begins to move the parcel to the right because the sum of forces on the parcel now has a Y component. Note that the PGF is still always perpendicular to the pressure gradient and the Coriolis force is always perpendicular to the velocity. Eventually, the PGF and the Coriolis force come into opposition with the velocity in between and Coriolis to the right of the velocity. In the end, the Y component of the force is a zero again, so the air parcel remains at the geostrophic velocity.


Hi there, Jeff Watts here, and July has been an absolutely great month for me in my Agile Mastery community. I thought I'd give you a quick roundup as to what's been going on. For me, it's been brilliant to see how the communities continue to grow since we started it and opened it up to a free wider membership. And we've now got over 500 members. And according to my analytics tool, 57% of those people are coming back time and time again, and 32.9% of them are actually contributing on a regular basis, which I think is amazing, really. Now that contribution could be through posting a question. It could be about adding your own experiences into the comments to help somebody else out. It could be people cheering other people's participation. It could be attending an event or having some more private, less visible one-to-one chats with other members of the network. But whatever that participation is, I think it's brilliant. And I actually think it's going to continue to rise because more and more people are feeling more and more comfortable in this setting. They're getting used to it. So we'll see more and more people coming out of their shells. Now every month, we have a theme of the month. And this month, we've had a theme of making change happen. And we've had discussions around psychological safety, the differences between Miro and Mural, the new Miro and Zoom integration. We've been talking about moving on from teams, leaving teams from a coaching perspective. After working with them for many years, we've had people sharing job openings for scrum masters and product owners. We've had people asking and talking about the challenge of dealing with teams who are open to Agile in name, but apparently a bit more resistant to Agile in practice. Lots of other interesting discussions. And in my smaller subscription channel, which is called Jeff's Agile Pirates, we've had some private bespoke sessions. First of all, with the remote coach Chris Stone, where together we designed a remote retrospective based on the theme of pizza. And you can get that template from Chris's website in his LinkedIn profile. We also had a bonus session with Nims DeWaan, who helped us look at how we can get better at aligning our expectations between one another and teams and managers and so on through the coaching practice of contracting. And we also had our monthly social, our lean coffee event, mostly focused around making change happen, plus a professional coaching circles where we could practice our coaching skills, our observation skills, our feedback skills. So another great month really. Now I started this community with the aim of giving people a space that was supposed to be safer and less ego driven than what you might find in typical social media or online forums, but also one that was more diverse than your own company Slack channel, and one that was a little bit more private and tailored than your average meetup group that you might go to on a Wednesday after work or something. And I've been really pleased to see how that's actually come to fruition and the conversation has remained exactly as was intended in the code of conduct. It's been respectfully diverse, open sharing of ideas, open minded receiving of ideas, exploring different options exactly what I was hoping for. For those of you who follow my work, who watch some of my videos on YouTube, read my blog post, my articles, things like that, this community is somewhere that you can interact directly with me, as well as other agileists, of course. And you can keep up to date with all of my latest developments and offerings, things, for example, like my new on demand courses, leadership courses, which are actually getting some really positive feedback and my articles and tweets and inspirational messages and so on. And our theme in August is sustainable pace. So we'll be looking at all aspects of that from an individual level of team level, product level, organizational level, plus the more general questions and scenarios that crop up outside of that theme. And I'm really excited to say we've got an awesome triple special guest workshop this month with who I'm calling the Queens of remote facilitation, Kirsten, Klasey, Jail and Morris. And they're teaming up with Joe Perrell, a good friend of ours. And they're going to help us explore a personal remote collaboration manifesto, which I'm looking forward to. We're still welcoming new members. And remember, this community is completely free. There are even spaces in the subscription channel, that Pirates channel, if you want to go deeper and get even more exclusive content coming on to some of these workshops, for example. And it would be great if I see you there at some point. But if not, have a great summer.


So it is not relative to Article 300 A of the Indian Constitution. Now, in an agreement which is consisting of both affirmative and negative governance, yes, after that, after my session is over, you can post your question one by one, then I will answer. Now let me finish the lecture given to me. Suppose an agreement consisting of two parts. One is in affirmative, another one is negative. When the negative part can be enforced by the court of law, that is the point. Part is affirmative, what is negative? Suppose an agreement was entered into, it's an illustration, I will give my answer subsequently. An agreement was entered into between an employer and his employee, stating that the employee should work with the employer for a period of five years. And during the currency of the agreement, he cannot quit the job and he cannot work with other employer or competing employer. This is the agreement. This agreement is consisting of two parts. One is to work with the employer for a period of five years, condition number one. This is affirmative in nature. Second one, negative agreement not to work with any competing employer. You should not work with the other company. The point is the employee left the company and joined the company, competing company. Now can the employer file a suit for specific performance? He is coupling his employee to work with his company for a period of five years. This is point number one. Suppose he don't want the employee to work with him for a period of five years. Can the employer file a suit for injunction for the enforcement of the negative covenant directing the employee not to work with other company for a period of five years. This is illustration. He just keep it in mind and I will answer this question one by one. So when an agreement is containing both affirmative and negative part, normally the court cannot enforce the negative part of the agreement straight away. This was the law prior to 1852. But first time the King's Court in England changed the view. The King's Court could not enforce the positive part of the agreement. So it is a personal service. The court cannot compel the employee to work with him because if there is a breach, damages is the adequate remedy. So when the adequate remedy is available, the court normally refuse to grant a degree post specific performance. So the positive part cannot be enforced. When the court could not enforce the positive part of the agreement, but still it could enforce the negative part of the agreement. This is the first time the law was lie down by the King's Court. Loomley versus Wagner 1852, 1, DEGM and G page 604. This is the first case on the subject. For the enforcement of negative governance. When the court is not in your position to grant a relief of specific performance, for the enforcement of the positive part of the agreement, it could grant a degree for permanent injunction for the enforcement of the negative governance. Now, next question is, normally a suit for specific performance must be filed for the enforcement of the positive part of the agreement. When the court comes to a conclusion that for other reasons, the court is reluctant or not in a position or not inclined to grant a relief of specific performance, it may grant other relief which is prayed for. So when the court comes to a conclusion that the positive part cannot be enforced, then it could grant a degree for permanent injunction for the enforcement of the negative governance. Now, here the point is whether a suit for enforcement of negative governance is maintainable in the absence of the prayer for the specific performance of the positive part. So a suit for specific performance must be filed for the enforcement of the positive agreement. When the court comes to a conclusion that it is not possible to grant such a relief, then only the court is entitled to grant the relief for the enforcement of the negative governance that is the law. But our Delhi High Court, in Frank Simo's Advertising Private Limited versus Sada Leasing Industries Limited, because you can post the citations in the chat box, here 1988 Delhi page 302. Mr. Vikas, not connected, okay. Here 1988 Delhi page 302. I'll ask Vikas to post the citations later and you can note down the cost item, what is name. Then here there our Delhi High Court said a suit for enforcement of negative governance is maintainable even in the absence of prayer for the specific performance of the positive part of the agreement. Now, in a suit for enforcement of negative governance, in whose burden it is, who has to prove? The burden of proof is on the person who pleads that there is no negative governance, they either express or in fact. The famous case in this field is Gujarat Bottling Company Limited versus Coca-Cola and others. This is here. Legal battle between Coca-Cola and Pepsi. It is reported in 1995 by SCC page 445. 1995 SCC page 445. Gujarat Bottling Company Limited versus Coca-Cola. In this case, the Coca-Cola Company entered into an agreement with the Gujarat Bottling Company They have to supply the syrups, they have to bottle it, fill it up and distribute the same agreement. Another condition is the shares in the Gujarat Bottling Company cannot be transferred without the consent of the Coca-Cola. Another condition is that the agreement is for a period of one year. During the period of one year, the Gujarat Bottling Company cannot fill the syrups of Pepsi or other competing company. So this is negative in nature. So the Gujarat Bottling Company cannot bottle, fill it up and sell it and distribute the same to the other competing company. Now Pepsi acquired the major shares in the Gujarat Bottling Company and after the acquisition of the shares in the Gujarat Bottling Company, the agreement issued notice to terminate the agreement. So irked by that Coca-Cola Company instituted suits before the Bombay High Court and filed an interlocked application for various relief and including the relief of enforcement of the negative covenant, restining Gujarat Bottling Company from bottling, filling, selling the Pepsi syrups. And that injunction was granted and it was challenged before the division bench of Bombay High Court has also upholded the order passed by the single judge of the Honourable High Court. Then the Gujarat Bottling Company filed SLP before the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court, it was argued that the negative covenant in the agreement is against the doctrine of restrain in trade, violating section 27 of the Indian contract act. So under section 27 of the Indian contract act, an agreement to restrain any trade calling or proportion is void. So the negative covenant, the negative path in the agreement, restaining Gujarat Bottling Company from carrying on their business with the other company is void as per section 27 of the Indian contract. For that, our Honourable Supreme Court has said, partial restraint of trade might be good if reasonable and it is not against the spirit of section 27 of the Indian contract act. You entered into an agreement agreeing to do service to Coca-Cola for a period of one year and during the currency of the one year, you have also agreed with your manifest and unequivocal intention not to do the same business with other company. So there is a breach on your part. Normally, when an application is taken out under order 39, rule 1 and 2 of CPC for injunction, view the petitioner who is seeking an order of injunction has to satisfy the triple test. The triple test is prima facie case, balance of convenience and if the injunction is not granted, injunction is not granted, it would cause irreparable injury to the petitioner. Prima facie case, balance of convenience irreparable injury is the triple points to be satisfied before getting an order of injunction. But our Supreme Court in the first time has also pointed out, no doubt the petitioner seeking an order of injunction must establish all these things, prima facie case, balance of convenience and if injunction is not granted, it would cause immense loss and fortune. But at the same time, the person who is opposing the grant of injunction, that is the opponent, that is the respondent, he must be fair and honest. The conduct of the respondent must be fair and conduct. Here, as against the agreement without the knowledge of the Coca-Cola company, Gujarat bottling company transferred major portion of the shares in power of Pepsi, that is the bridge number one. Second one, the agreement was terminated not by Coca-Cola, it was terminated by Gujarat bottling company. Third one is, there is an agreement, negative agreement, not to fill the syrups of Pepsi during the currency of the one year. So the bridge is only on the part of the Gujarat bottling company. So the order passed by the division branch of the Bombay High Court does not require any influence. At this stage, past argument was advanced on the side of Gujarat bottling company that if the injunction is granted, restining the Gujarat bottling company from caring and business and then the company would become ideal. There are more than 500 employees and 5000 employees and 500 officers and their flight has to be taken into consideration. Repelling such argument, the Supreme Court said the fault is on your part. The court has already said the negative covenant is not against section 27 of the contract act and the negative agreement, negative covenant can be enforced to meet all the ends of justice. So finally, the Supreme Court upheld the order passed by the division branch of the Bombay High Court. Then another case, normally the court has to consider before granting an order of injunction whether the plaintive has made out a prima basic case, whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of the plaintive. If the injunction has prayed for it's not granted, whether it would cause immense loss and irreparable injury to the plaintive petitioner that has to be taken into consideration. But in a suit for enforcement of negative covenant, first time the England court said the concept of balance of convenience under the damages being adequate remedy become less important. Become less important. If the suit is for the enforcement of positive part of the agreement then all those prima basic case balance of convenience, irreparable injury will be taken into consideration. In the case for the enforcement of the negative covenant, it become less important. 1878-3 appealed cases 709. This has been followed by the Calcutta High Court in the case reported in IR 1996 Calcutta page 67. Vijay Mineral's private limited process Vikas Chandra Day. IR 1996 Calcutta page 67. In the case it is relating to the delivery of manganese work for a period of 5 years and there is a negative agreement and the court has held for the grant of injunction for the enforcement of negative covenant, the balance of convenience is less important and the argument was advanced. Suppose he can get the compensation for the damages. Normally when the court is able to assess adequate compensation for the breach then the court will be reluctant to grant the relief of specific performance. Here the court is not going to grant the relief of specific performance. The court is going to grant a degree for permanent injunction for the enforcement of negative covenant. So that is why the court said the balance of convenience and the adequate damages is the adequate remedy become less important. And in another case I think it has not been reported but we please take it out. Suresh Danuka versus Sunita Maha Patra Supreme Court. In this case our Supreme Court has held section 42. Before that I would like to emphasize one point. The defences available against the grant of injunction section 41 when injunction can be refused. Some grounds are stated in section 41 A to J. So these are all the grounds to refuse to grant a degree for injunction. Under section 41 E of the specific relief act, injunction cannot be granted to prevent the breach of a contract the performance of which could not be specifically enforced. When the court cannot grant a degree for the performance of when the court comes to a conclusion degree for specific performance cannot be granted. Equally it cannot grant a degree for injunction to prevent the breach of a contract. But section 42 in its opening sentence notwithstanding section 41 E of the specific relief act. So section 42 is an exception to section 41 E. It contains non-upstanding class. Even though specific performance cannot be enforced still the court has got power to grant the relief for the enforcement of negative covenant. So in this case the Supreme Court has held section 42 is an exception to section 41 E and it is not violating section 27 of the Indian contract act. And another case, this is not reported, image advertising and another, this is Delhi High Court. In this case an agreement was entered into the plaintiff and defendant to display the holding and the neon sign in the place belonging to the defendant for a period of five years. And there is a negative agreement apart that during the currency of the five years the defendant respondent company shall not allow other parties holding and display. Dispute arose, suit has been filed for specific performance and also for enforcement of negative covenant. In that case, in that case the judgment of Supreme Court reported in AR 1967 Supreme Court page 1098 pass refer. In this case this is NS Golic Curry versus Century Spending Company Limited. 1967 Supreme Court page 1098. In this case the Supreme Court tested the agreement between the employer and employee. At my introduction I have illustrated that an agreement was entered into between the employer and employee. The agreement contains that the employee should work with the employer for a period of five years and during the currency of the five years he cannot leave and work with other company. Whether such a class is against is against the doctrine of restraint of trade. The court said no doubt this agreement contains two parts. One is affirmative part that is directing the employee to work with the company for a period of five years. This is not against the doctrine of restraint of trade for problem. But restraining the employee from working with other company is against the doctrine of restraint of trade. So this is relating to personal service. This has been argued before the Supreme Court. This has been argued before the Delhi High Court. And by citing other judgments of Supreme Court, Delhi High Court pointed out the employer-employee agreement is mainly relating to the personal service. It cannot be equated with the other commercial contracts, other commercial contracts. No doubt in this agreement of employer and employee, the aggrieved employer is entitled to file suit for damages or get compensation and he cannot restrict the employee from carrying on any other business from working with other company. But that agreement cannot be equated, cannot be put on par with the other commercial contracts. Here there is an agreement to permit the plaintiff to display coding and a neon sign in the place earmarked by the defender belonging to him. And before displaying the coding and neon sign, it requires license from the municipality, corporation. The corporation will grant license only the owner of the property gives his no objection. No objection was not given by the owner. So the prior petitioner is not in a position to get license. This is due to the non-cooperation on the part of the respondent because the respondent fails to give his no objection. And he is attempting to invite other parties to erect coding and a neon sign in the place. So a suit for injunction for enforcement of negative governance was filed. So though the court cannot enforce the specific performance, erecting the respondent for the specific performance of the agreement that is to allow the petitioner to erect his coding and a neon sign. But still in as much as the agreement contains the negative part, the court is not powerless. The court is omnipotent. The court has got premier of powers to grant the relief of injunction for the enforcement of negative governance. Ultimately the suit was decreed. And another case, GVK airport holding. GVK airport holdings limited versus BIT service division. This Delhi High Court ordered dated 17 2019. GVK airport holding limited and BIT services division. In this case, the Mumbai airport is being operated by GVK company. And the major shares in the Mumbai international airport limited. It was held by BIT service division. There is an agreement between the GVK company and the BIT service division that as and when the BIT service division is intending to transfer its shares the first priority must be given to GVK company. In other words, the GVK company has a right of first rate, first to refusal. If the GVK is not willing to buy the transfer then it can sell it in favor of any departments. So the right of first to refusal is given to GVK company. Because preemptive right is given to GVK company to purchase the shares of the BIT service division. Namely the shares of Mumbai international airport limited. The BIT service division wanted to transfer their shares in favor of some third parties. Aggravated by the decision of the BIT service division, GVK company filed a suit and they have invoked the arbitration class and they have also filed an application before the Bombay High Court, the Delhi High Court for various relief including the relief of enforcement of negative conduct. In this case, first time Delhi High Court invoked the principles of readiness and willingness before granting the relief of negative conduct. Normally in your suit by specific performance, the preemptive must establish that he is always ready and willing to perform his part of conduct from when the disappoints. In your suit by specific performance, it is imperative. It is incumbent on the part of the plaintiff to show that he is always ready and willing to perform his part of contract from the day one that is from the date of execution of the agreement. The moment the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the vendor, he must establish that he is always ready and willing that having sufficient financial resources to pay off the balance sell price and his conduct is unblemished. This is 2013-15 SCC page 27. I have taken the debt by LR versus K Subramani. There is no quarrel about it. Yes, the plaintiff has to establish that he is always ready and willing to perform his part of contract from the day one. And also, the plaintiff must prove his readiness and willingness. Now, the specific relief has been amended in 2018. Here, you need not aware that you are ready and willing that part is deleted. But the plaintiff must prove that he is always ready and willing to perform his part of contract. Only on proof of his readiness and willingness, a degree for specific performance can be granted. So, the prerequisite for the grant of specific performance is to satisfy the court that the plaintiff is always ready and willing to perform his part of contract. Part is the term readiness. Part, it means the phraseology readiness and willingness. Readiness means the phraseology it refers to the financial capacity or financial resources of the plaintiff to purchase the property from the defender. But he must possess sufficient fund to purchase the property, namely to pay off the balance sale consideration. So, he must prove that he is having sufficient funds to purchase the property, that is readiness. The willingness is a term referable to the conduct of the plaintiff. The conduct of the plaintiff has to be scrutinized along with the attendant circumstances. Part is the date of the agreement. Part is the period given to the plaintiff to perform his part of contract. Whether during the currency of the period, whether within the stipulated period, whether the plaintiff has performed his part of obligation, whether he has issued any notice calling upon the vendor to receive the balance sale consideration and the executive sale it in his favor. These are all the conduct and the attending circumstances on the part of the plaintiff to show his willingness. So, both of the terms readiness and willingness are inseparable having nexus with each other. So, the key point to be proved before the court to get a degree for specific performance is the plaintiff's readiness and willingness and his, he has to prove. But in the instant case, the GWK company though instituted the preferred matter to an arbitrator and filed an application before the Delhi High Court has not at all alleged that they are having, but because the shares is worth is running to several crores, several crores. They have not alleged anything that they are having, they are financially sound and able to mobilize funds to purchase the shares. So, frustrated by this, even though the GWK company has got a right of refusal, preemptive right, but in as much as they have failed to prove their financial capacity to purchase the property, it is not desirable to grant the relief of injunction for the enforcement of negative command and restraining the BIT service division to transfer their share in favor of any third parties. So, ultimately the application filed by the GWK company was dismissed. So, what has to be, this is proviso to section 42, section 42 of the specific relief act and the proviso says provided that the plaintiff has not failed to perform the contract so far as it is binding on him. So, the judgment of the Supreme Court is on this point, there is no breach on the part of the bank. So, he must establish his legal right and he must establish that he has performed this part of application and his conduct is worthy and unblemished. So, in the absence of proof of readiness and willingness on the part of the petitioner, he cannot get an order of injunction for the enforcement of negative command in an agreement, in the agreement. So, this is very famous case, GWK airport holding limited company case. And another one, Indian charge chrome limited versus Tata iron and steel company limited 1996 one Kolkata law time page 214. In this case, whether the negative part must be expressed in the agreement or it can be inferred by necessary implication or it can be implied. In this case, the Tata iron and steel company limited entered an agreement with the Indian charge chrome limited for the delivery of chrome and coke. In the agreement, there is a clause which says the disco has to make available the entire quantity of chrome ore and coke mentioned in the agreement. This is the positive. But the court has held that negative command and positive part in the agreement necessarily implies a negative command and that the disco shall not cease to make available the above quantities of chrome ore and coke on regular basis. So, the court held even in the absence of express negative command in an agreement, it can be inferred by necessary implication that there is a negative command and then there is no problem for the court to enforce a negative command. 1996 one Kolkata law times page 214. And the court further went on saying it is well settled that in each case, the court should examine the substance of the agreement and not its form to ascertain whether there is a negative command. At this juncture, I would like to remember, normally the parties are entered into agreement in the form of lease or something in the form of license. The confusion will arise whether it is a lease deed or a license deed. Often the advocates are perplexed whether it is a deed of lease or deed of license. What is the difference? If it is a lease deed, there is a transfer of interest in the immobile property to enjoy the property for a particular period. Section 105 of transfer of property act. If in this case of a license, as per section 52 of the Indian Eastman, license is only a mere right to do something in or upon the property of other party particular. So, in the case of lease, even after the expiry of the lease period, if the let's see continues to be in possession of the property, he is entered to get an order of injection. Because he was put into, he was entered into possession of the property as a let's see for a particular period and he noticed a previous issue and he can only be evicted in the manner bound to. But in the case of license, it ceased the moment the period mentioned the license period expires. Automatically it will be revoked. So, after the expiry of the license period, the licensee cannot get an order of injection, even after the expiry of the license period. That is the law. But sometimes, lease will be granted, but the deed says it is a lease. The conclusion will arise. I will give some example for license. If any license is given to catch a fish in your pond, this is only a license. What was given to you to catch a fish? You cannot claim any exclusive possession over the pond. When there is a multi-storied building, the entire key is with the owner and in one part you are allowed to do certain business. It's only a license. It is only a license. So, licensee should depend upon the will of the licensee to carry out this business. And right to vend prasadam in a temple. It is not a lease even though any place is segregated to vend prasadam in a temple. It is not a lease because once the temple is closed, the licensee cannot carry on its business. This is a license. So, after the period of license, automatically it will come to an end. The licensee has no right to seek an order of injection against the licensee. But in the case of, let's see, it is not. So, the test to ascertain whether it is a lease or license is known as litmus test. The assigned student might aware, but what is litmus? Litmus test. So, what is important? Not the nomenclature of a particular dogma. What is the substance? So, the Kolkata High Court has also helped. Even in the absence of express negative covenant by necessary implication, it can be inferred that there is an implied negative covenant under those circumstances it can be enforced. That is the dictum tied by the Kolkata High Court in the case reported in Indian charge chrome limiter versus Tata iron and steel company limiter. So, with this citation, I am concluding my session on the enforcement of positive and negative part of the agreement. I have shared the judgments. I have reshared the entire set of judgments, though we had separately also made it. I have shared the judgments which you have done separately as well as in a joint form. You have done the both. And you have also shared your answers to the questions which we had. And now we have Adilakshmi ma'am. Your popularity can be shown that Adilakshmi ma'am also had to be kept in a waiting list. Just like in the railway train, we have a reservation against cancellation. Thank you. Thank you, my dear brother Vikas, for inviting me and also the Leaky Leaky Salite and of course our beloved and most respected Shankar Murli sir. Whenever we call him, he is there to us to explain anything on the civil jurisprudence, he is an authority and encyclopedia. We are so happy that South and North is connecting time and again and Vikas is doing a wonderful job almost pan India and international level people are getting connected to him. It's a really wonderful session. Thank you Shankar Murli sir. Your session was very excellent and almost everyone got connected. What mistake I did was I was posting the link to everyone failing to connect myself in. So the whole team got connected. I was left out. Without the captain, the ships started sailing because our captain Mr. Shankar Murli sir and Vikas was there. So it is really wonderful but I was connected with your Facebook and I was listening to the session throughout from the beginning. Even I couldn't connect the 100 participant. I was immediately on the Facebook and the YouTube. It is very useful, very nice session. Excellent one. Thank you so much. Thank you. We are very happy and this COVID-19 situation and the lockdowns and all the vacation is going to be very productive on both the platforms of Leaky Leaky Salite and the Beyond Law CLC. Thank you so much and we will be getting connected time and again and bringing in more faculties down south. Thank you. Thank you so much. Is there any questions in the chat box and I will answer. Before going with the question, I am telling that what we did those question answers which we had taken in the first five questions. We have divided into the YouTube. That question has been created as a separate YouTube and this session has been created as a separate session on the YouTube. This is by Chandrasekhar whether a suit based on premature agreement is maintainable. Sir, whether a suit on the basis of premature agreement is maintainable. Can you post it in the chat box? I will do that. I will pass them to post it in the chat box. I have posted it. To the first time. The question is from Anil Kumar Taghi. Whether a suit based on premature agreement is maintainable kindly unlike a premature agreement is not maintainable. Because there must be some corresponding duties on the part of the, suppose in Mandar in the case of sale agreement, Mandar and Wendy. Premature agreement, suppose the class says this agreement will take effect on particular font. Even prior to that if any suit is filed then the suit is premature. The suit on premature agreement is not maintainable. If any case is given then I can enlighten further. Next one. Any other questions posted in the chat box? No sir, none. I will just check it on the YouTube. Yes, yes. Cancelation of a development agreement of a builder not willing to cancel the five years, not starting the work. What to do? It's not on the chat box, it's on the YouTube. Is it the chat box? No, it's on the YouTube. It says there's a builder and he's not building the property and neither cancelling the agreement. What can be done? What is the question? Please repeat. The builder has not built the building and he's not willing to cancel the agreement also. Then it is open to the owner of the site to terminate the agreement and the suit against the builder for compensation. Read section 15 of the specific impact in this aspect. Agreement has to be terminated or the owner of the site is willing to engage the very same engineer, builder. He can choose a specific performance directing the builder to put up the construction as per the specification. He's not willing, he can terminate the agreement and he can sue for damages. This is the last question he says. No, this is a separate question. Yes, kindly explain general damages and special damages. General damages and special damages. It's an ocean. I have to cover section 72 of the Indian contract act and special damages and general damages. Just I will give one illustration. I hope that it will be useful to understand. Suppose you enter an agreement with a builder. You are the owner of the site. You enter an agreement with a builder to put up house as per the specification attached to the agreement. The rates are specified like this. As in the earlier case, the builder refused to perform his part of obligation. He has not put up the construction as per the specification. And he left the work in the office. Then the owner can terminate agreement and he can sue for damages against a builder. He can claim damages on two divisions. One is general. Another one is special. General on account of the breach on the part of the builder, he has suffered mental loss. Mental agony. For your mental agony and mental loss, you cannot assess the exact value. So it can be tentatively valued according to your living standard. General, special damages and the work was not done. He left the construction work in the office and the owner has to engage some other builder to put up the further construction. And the cost, the variation between the earlier agreement and the second one, it comes under the special damages. He is entitled to get the special damages from the builder who has breached the agreement. Last version, a separate lecture is required to enlighten this aspect. What are all comes within the purview of general damages and the special damages. Special damages is the actual loss incurred by the party affected. General damages is loss of reputation and compensation for the mental sufferings. Deepak, can license, licensee be dispossessed of the premises once the leave license agreement is expired by calling the police? Can licensee be dispossessed of the premises once the leave license agreement is expired by calling the police authorities? Yes, the leave and license agreement is mainly entered into between the mobile companies to erect a tower on the private building. It's only a license. As I said earlier, license can be revoked after the expiry of the license period. It is automatic, need not be revoked. After the expiry of the license period, automatically the license will be revoked, it get revoked. Now, the question is whether the licensee be dispossessed of the premises once leave and license agreement is expired. You need not go to the police station. If you are able to dispossess the licensee with the help of your friends, you can do it. The licensee cannot file a suit and he cannot lodge a police complaint provided in the decent manner he must be dispossessed. Suppose leave and license is given, you can disconnect to the electricity, you can close the door and you still are a law abiding citizen. We can go to the police station, lodge a complaint stating that I have given only license for a period of one year or two years as the case may be and the period is expired. The lawyer is not leaving the place and please help us to evict them. But normally this is civil nature, police will be very reluctant and I think if any other point is available, I will do some homework. Whether it will lie against the police to dispossess the licensee who is illegally occupying the premises after the expiry of the licensee period. But under law, licensee has no authority to remain in possession and endowment of the property after the expiry of the licensee period. That is the law, that is section 52 of the Indian easement act. But one exception is that suppose the licensee has made some improvement and made some improvement by way of erecting semi permanent structure then the licensee is irrevocable after the expiry of the licensee period. It is irrevocable provided there must be some permanent structure must be put up by the licensee. It is a special privilege, license is a special privilege. I have argued the case before the Madras High Court, Madurai branch that is also reported. I don't know the citations, in 2016, 6 MLA I think so. I have argued what is the dismiss test, how to distinguish the lease from license, what is the remedy available to the licensee. He is still in possession and endowment of the property after the expiry of the licensee period. In that case, my client has given license to run your restaurant in the Tamil Nadu tourism department in the place owned by the Tamil Nadu tourism department. After the expiry of the licensee period, they came and closed the door. So we get filed the suit. Initially we got the entry model, subsequently it was vacated. The matter went to up to High Court. In the High Court said, no, no, no, you are only a licensee. What the licensee hit that is to close the door is perfect. You can remove all your articles and leave the possession to the licensee. We can't help. So if it is a license, after the expiry of the licensee period, licensee has no right to remain in possession of the property. He can be evicted, but in the manner known to law. The manner known to law doesn't mean that you have to file a suit for eviction against the licensee that is not at all necessary. Because law does not recognize the licensee's right to remain in possession of the property after the expiry of the licensee period. What is the limitation in case for rectification of instrument? A suit maintainable after 20 years of the death of the executor of the deed. Second last question. Rectification of instrument. Three years. One second, one second. Yes. The build of limitation. If any fraud or mistake is committed. Section 26 are specifically packed. When through fraud or mutual mistake of the parties, a contract or other instrument in writing does not express the real intention, then either of the parties representative in interest may institute a suit to have the instrument rectified. So what is the field of limitation? Limitation act article does not say. Normally the suit to set aside instrument is three years from the date of execution of the instrument. That is also normally applicable to rectification of deed. But any fraud is pleaded. Section 17 of the limitation act says. When fraud is pleaded. From the date of knowledge of the fraud, the period of limitation is one year from the date of knowledge of the fraud. When the plaintiff noticed that the fraud has been committed while executing this instrument, so he can sue for rectification or setting aside instrument. The suit may be filed after the 20 years of the death of the executor provided when he came to know the fraud committed by the other party. Section 17 of the limitation act. The next question can be taken up. Yes. Agreement of sales is executed between one and purchaser for sale of land. And purchaser has to pay within three months' violent sale consideration. But owner is supposed to survey by official surveyor of underlaw office and then only purchaser would purchase. But owner did not do survey in three months. Now six months elapsed and the owner is trying to sell to third parties. Notice is issued restaining owner not to sell. Purchaser said he is ready and willing to purchase provided he does survey. What suit is to be filed? A suit for specific performance is must. In addition to that, you can pray for mandate injunction directing the owner to survey the property with assets of a qualified surveyor. Under section 21 of the specific lip ad, section 22, in addition to the relief of specific performance, we can ask for and mandate injunction directing the owner to survey the property in your absence with the assistance of a qualified surveyor. Suppose another point, another dispute will arise. Suppose your agreement says that the property agreed to be conveyed is one acre of land. But only after the survey, if it is found that the property measures only 75 cents, three and half acre, three by four acre. And what is the remedy? We are not remedy less. Section 12 of the specific lip ad, a degree for specific performance in part can be granted. Even though the agreement is in respect of one acre, you can ask for specific performance in respect of 75 cents and you are entitled to proportionately reduce the sale price. You have to file a super specific performance. Without filing a super specific performance, if you file a suit to survey the property before filing the super specific performance, that is not maintainable. In addition to the super specific performance, you can also pray for mandate injunction for survey. I have posted a last question. Yes. Just check it out. Very interesting question. The state are executed a will to his wife for life after then to his son, but son died before his mother death. What is the position of the deceased son legal gas? So the legality died. Legality died. That is the beneficiary died. The legality died before the other. So no one is there to get the property. So the will is slapsed. If it is slapsed, the general rule of succession will apply. So the test data is deemed to be died interstate, even though he has executed it. So he is deemed to be died interstate. So his class one legal guy is sent to get the property. The wife being the wife estate holder is the class one legal guy. He sent it to get the property absolutely. The last question is the state are executed a will in his in favor of his wife for life interest. After that it was to go to answer this question. No, but that wants to transfer the share to her during her lifetime. What is the position of law? Mother wants to transfer the share during his lifetime to the son. Last question. Should I read it? Sir, this is my first question. Mother cannot transfer his life interest according to section 6. Somebody has posted what about section 14 under the Hindu succession act? Once life estate is given, he cannot transfer, assign, relinquish, release. He can't do. That is my first problem. Question number one. Another question is, a debtor sold out the property after piling the suit for recovery of the money by creditor with an intention to make delay the debtor has not other properties except that what is the remedy? Yes, very good question. Take section 53 of the transfer of property act. If the debtor transfers the property with an intention to cheat and defraud the creditor, then such a transfer is a fraudulent transfer. You can file your suit to set aside the fraudulent transfer and recover the amount by attaching the set property. Last question. For feature of deposit for non-performance of contract. Is this in nature of compensation for non-performance? This section 23 of the specific relief act. Suppose the agreement contemplates a feature of advanced amount in the case of non-performance. So, non-performance, a particular sum is quantified as compensation for non-performance of contract. In the case of non-performance. So, non-performance, a particular sum is quantified as compensation, namely the advanced sum. The point is, can the vendor perfect the advanced amount or account of the non-performance on the part of the purchase? This is number question number one. But section 23 says the for-feature class is for the compiling the purchaser to perform his part of contract, that the for-feature class is inserted, then the court has got power to grant a specific performance, degree for specific performance, if the suit is filed by the purchaser for specific performance. If the specific performance, in addition to that, we can also claim damages. But here, non-performance on the part of the purchaser. Purchaser can terminate the agreement. Purchaser can terminate the agreement. As per the class in the agreement, he is entitled to perfect the deposit amount. Then he has to keep silent. Then the suit will be filed either for the specific performance or for the return of the advance amount. Then the vendor has to make a defense that he has quantified the amount as damages. So I am rightly perfected that amount. He need not file any suit. He can simply perfect that amount and keep silent. And if any suit is filed, he can take it as a defense. What is the limitation to file suit at the section 53 of the TPA Act? 53 of the TPA Act. When you came to know the fraudulent transfer, within a period of three years. Okay. So thank you, sir, for giving your insights. If Adhiraakshmi is there, then we can… Because G, the next lecture onwards, I have to work hard because our participants are very brilliant, posting questions after questions. I am unable to answer those questions. I have to work hard. I have to read more. I have to enrich myself. I have to enlighten myself. I have to read again and again. The participants are very brilliant. Everybody is learning in that process. And you are able to answer it. It shows the volume of knowledge you have. Yes. Adhiraakshmi Ma'am has to unmute. Yeah. Yes, Vikas. Thank you. Thank you for calling in. So excellent, sir. Shankar Muli, sir. You know answers for everything, sir. Whatever question it's, shoot up. You just come up with the brilliant answers. And of course, Vikas, you're doing a wonderful job. You're bringing in so many new topics and so many excellent legal luminaries as speakers. And it is excellent to listen to your topic and day in and day out. And tomorrow also, someone from south is doing a session. They had asked me to post it in Legal Legal Salite. So even though I don't... Yes, yes. I have got a request from his junior or someone today. Evening that the posters has to go on our Legal Legal Salite platform. We are really eager to do it. And it's a pleasure to get your connection to you. Thank you, Shankar Muli, sir. Thank you so much. And special thanks to his junior, Haritha, who does everything, helping all, getting all the... Today he's not with me. He's writing an LLM exam. He said to... Sir, you have your daughter by your side to support, sir. He's also on the online examination. Yes, sir. We are all there to support, sir. The Legal Legal Salite family is all with you and beyond our CLC, sir. Thank you so much, sir. Thank you, Vikas. And thank you, every one of you, for joining in. Thanks to the Legal Legal Salite team for joining a new member. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. Thank you, Vikasji. Thank you. Thank you for the day. Before we part for the day, tomorrow's session is Admissibility of Documents, Marking and Exhibition by K. Prabhakar, an advocate from Madurai High Court. So do stay connected with us at tomorrow 5.30 p.m. And one of the sessions, like we had with Mr. Shingar Murli, Mr. Mukanta is taking a very simple, making the definitions under the Transfer of Property Act. Next week he's coming. Definitions of Transfer of Property Act. Very simple.  And those who have not done the vaccination kindly do the same.   But at the same time, you shouldn't go outside the home. You all know that reaching the Lakshman Rekha, what can be the result. Everyone stay safe. Thank you.  And for the participants, they might feel that why there are two YouTube uploads of this particular session. We have divided the first five questions into one particular session that's already uploaded. And this session separately, wherein we took section 42 and there on, that has also been uploaded separately. So those who want to look into those five questions have to watch that YouTube channel, uploading separately and this one separately. Thank you. Thank you, sir, for sharing your knowledge. And thank you, Adilakshmi ma'am. I'm the entire team of legal legal rights. Thank you.


the public and senator from the line. And two, and to you so that everyone knows where George really is tonight, George Montage. You was in 1980, October of the 20th specifically, when you had your great debate in Cleveland, Ohio with a guy named Jimmy Carter. Do you remember that? President, I'm not going to have that opportunity to share my vision for Ohio in a debate. The senator who said debates are the way candidates submit themselves to the public has broken his promise to Ohioans. I think I'm very proud of her and what the cause that she is speaking or addressing herself gives her a lot of country. I know that there's a lot of talk now when you heard about it. Nancy was speaking to a school group or classroom in Oakland, California, and little girls stood up and said, what do we do when someone moved? The two Georges stand as proud defenders and promoters of a vibrant economy, limited central government, strong national defense, and the American system, and the American people. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I say it again. There are two Georges this year. And I don't know of a better, more able, and more principled public servant than the man who was going to be the next senator from the state of Ohio, George Boinevich. Game Mayor Cleveland in 1979, George found the city treasury mired in debt to the tune of $111 million. On June 20th, 1987, he paid off the last of that debt. People said it couldn't be done, but they didn't understand that George Boinevich is the Charlie Hussle of Ohio politics. That kind of accomplishment is what we need money. And then have the nerve to go on television on the Sunday morning shows and complain that there's a budget deficit.  It's Congress that appropriates, Congress that authorizes, and Congress that spends. George Boinevich knows what you are against, the line item veto and the balanced budget amendment.  They want pork, pork, pork. You know what that means. It means taxes, taxes, and taxes. Well, one of the liberal tax and spend ringleaders in Washington is the fellow who's running against George Boinevich this year. The nonpartisan Washington Publication Congressional Court, they called him the liberal master of obstruction. Needless to say, he voted for those boondoggle bills. He's voted for so many of them. He's been given the dubious distinction of winning a big spender award from the National Taxpayers Union. I think they're going to give him thumbs down. Boinevich's opponent has carried a stealth candidacy to New Heights by refusing to debate George even once, as he told you. With his record, I can understand why. No Ohio liberal believe they opposed the death penalty, or at least the Ohio liberal did until the selection. He had a sudden change of heart and decided to support for drug cave-ins. Not that, but for a political opportunism. Who knows what he'll support next year? With your point of vision, George, punishment, and I agree, difference in values, that explains why the liberal sometimes seem to care more about the rights of criminals than the rights of honest and law-abiding Americans. You see, they have reliable evidence obtained reasonably and in good faith by our police to be used in criminal prosecutions. That's the kind of position they take on crime. And they're just plain wrong who invoke the Constitution when they take it. I don't see a word of it. January the 11th, I had the honor of presenting you a key to the city of Cleveland. And I presented it to you. And I said, I hope that it would remind you that you were key to the door of the Democrat-controlled United States Senate. And Ohio is key to sending someone to the United States Senate that has your values and your institution.


If we think what we're working on actually matters for the world then that dissemination includes people outside of the academy and so our systems of scholarly communication should engage that information transmission to people who might have been trained in our fields and now doing jobs and policy or in nonprofits or in commercial world whatever they're doing their work and giving them information or people who are just informed individuals in the world or want to be informed individuals in the world and tangle with the issues that we wrestle with for how they might be relevant for for their own work.


Hello everyone, welcome to another NARC survivor live video just on the balcony today at my hotel in the mountains. I've been doing lots of exploring today, I've been to some temples and a waterfall. So it's been a really good day, I've enjoyed it, had a great time and now I'm just back at the hotel tonight going to do some work and I thought I'd put this live video out as well. So let's get into it. This is why you don't hear from the narcissist. Many of you may be in a situation where the narcissist has just disappeared. They've ghosted you and you don't know why because maybe things were going okay. Everything was fine and then all of a sudden they just left. Sometimes it may be new supply but that's not always the case especially if you were dealing with a sociopath or a psychopath then it's not always going to be the new supply. Another reason and this is actually a lot more common than people think but another reason why you don't hear from the narcissist, it's actually quite simple and you will know if this was true in your case because when you look back you will remember how at one moment they were talking to you, you were seeing them, everything was okay, maybe you were texting them or messaging them on social media and they were responding to you and they were calling you or you were answering their phone calls so you were in contact with them.


Today we're here to both celebrate the awesome work done by the staff here at ServiceBC Centre and across BC and with BC Organ Transplant to encourage people to sign up for organ donation. We are so proud of the fact that our staff with their amazing passion for this work, Service with a Heart in every sense of the way, have managed to sign up over 60,000 donation cards and we encourage people to come into our offices, have the conversation with our staff and to sign up because every time you sign up you save a life and you know what each organ donation person who signs up has the potential for eight organ donations themselves. So our staff does an amazing job but also it's the courage and bravery of those people who come and sign and talking to two recipients today and hearing how it impacts their families. This is a gift of life not only for the individual but to their family, friends and extended family. So please go on the website, come into our BC Service Centres but sign up.


The best thing about studying in Australia is having an international environment. Now before I came here, I was thinking locally. Now I think internationally and globally. Meeting so many people, making friends, getting to know different cultures, Australia and the people over here, they are just amazing. The Australian University teaches you the wise and how, but not only just what, where or when. Australia is a diverse country, so it provides me high standard quality education in a very multicultural environment. The diversity in the courses, the subject material that you have here is quite vast. Any student here can take different pathways as he or she wishes, and I think the excellence available in terms of the course material as well as the tutors. The educational system, the university faculty is very supportive, and the resources you have, like there is a library in every area, so it's very helpful.


oh here's something the shaft uh watch it yeah it definitely looks like there's another level on there doesn't it the water pipes and airlines both go down in there you know that's not a not a ladder system so that's something to consider for the future that shaft going down there all right well let's check it out everything locked and loaded got my safety we're tied down to a pretty big still looks like it's good here this is part of the wall so that's not just that's not way down there that's just part of the wall right wish me luck good luck all right I'm hanging look good looks good not cross-loaded no you down on the dips of the mind well cats down here waiting to chomp me I don't think so here comes Julie the mine explorer pretty nice little rain right here and on this pillar look at that a little bit of everything quartz iron silver lead she's gonna want to be pelting rocks at me so I might have to dive out of the way looking good you got it oh nothing here's rocks just trying not to rock any all right you made it get your legs underneath you so once we get down here this is what we see there's a pretty good area it's been taken out over there creating a nice stove this big pillar has been kind of left there there's a piece of ladder there's a there's an ore pass right here I tried to cover it up with a couple sticks because when you get off the rope you'd want to suck you right in there wants to and then looking over here there's more of this beautiful mineral action and the pipes air and water lines both come down there they head down this way a slight incline or a decline I guess it is and there is a man way down there I already checked it out looks usable that probably goes down to a lower level this way it's just a low stove I haven't looked way over there but I do feel some air coming through there so some more stuff to check out we got to go down follow these pipes down to that square boxed-in man way okay here we are I'm standing on top of this boxed-in area it's in good shape I don't know that we'll need a rope going down there but we have it it looks like it just is level at the bottom the airline it looks like goes this way there's a little ways and stops and I haven't been over there that might go down to okay there's Julie over there she's looking down that man way I went came down I follow this pipe over here there's looks like some sort of drift there's a big shoot coming in I'm not sure where this goes we could actually check this out Julie if you want I'm utilizing a pipe we focused for climbing okay before we go down that man way we're gonna check this area out I don't know if it's a drift or just a stove or there's a big shoot here with a collector looks like and there's a giant part of a giant box oh boy we ended up in this big stove it's in good shape too it's a pretty pretty big left to right and the vein looks like it was about six to eight ten feet wide even in some places this is looking down it's very steep and this is looking to our right let's walk over here the way watch your stuff though there's another either a manly or that could possibly be a level that way so this is kind of underneath what we just came through we're down wandering around in a stove here's some of the stuff that was left that's gonna be a good indication of what the vein was like this sort of pillar here the stoves in good shape here's a nice look at the vein here what's the what they didn't take anyway that's my ascender squeaking in it see there's another either a manly or a or something over there we could probably get around there although it's gonna be a little dicey right in the corner check out this vein how many colors are in it it's like a rainbow of colors yeah pretty neat oh yeah that's an older style survey type marking the little tack all right let's see if where that manly goes I mean I'm guessing it's just gonna go down into this bottom of this stove but we're gonna go down the manly yep we'll try to ready right you just have a rope on here for safety just in case the ladders give out the ladders look pretty good well there's a little it's a little fine on here the bottom is a little fine it's a little well used nothing in a drop on me no no it's a little longer step on the change over okay all right let's go check it out all right here comes Julie on the skinny ladder come a tight squeeze of the pack you can go to the right to with your foot yeah and your skinny yeah how do you think I got through there you're gonna have to switch your foot over to the other side of the pipe there you go there you go now you got to switch now you should have stopped for just a second stop for just a second go back up one step now put your right foot or up one step no not that far right right there now put your left foot on the other one because you gotta switch over here put your left foot where your right foot just was move your left foot yeah now you got to step over to the right yep and down now go a lot yeah you got your foot no no you have plenty ladder climber you're getting there though a little confusing tight quarters up there watch where you're going behind you know you still got a little ways to go see it's a danger keep out and then does that say queen entrance it's ent but intersection to queen ent where's the arrow going up oh there yeah okay do you want to go that way a little bit so this is taking it right off that manly ladder says number 20 up there we're down in a stope again don't think we're gonna go very far this way a lot of timbers jammed up in here there is a cable along or this is like a safety cable in the huh yeah I think so we're just a handhold because you really don't want to fall down in there it goes this is a very steep stope that's a big shoot of some sort over there you could walk along here if you stay to the right anyway let's go the other way once and just see what happens that looks like it was a ladder right there that's it looks like the top of a ladder don't know all right let's go back this way a lot of debris right here yeah wonder miners use that cable for that that's another use of the cable is a ladder we came up we're down and we took our gear off yeah that looks like it would have held event piped on it so maybe that's a good sign maybe this is a level going this way a little further well it doesn't look like it if it is it looks like it's collapsed dangerous yikes acres goes off into the get this whole wall oh they had electricity way down in here look at that little insulator up there look at that huge wall that's so strange the water pipe goes down there though doesn't it what a trip not literally I hope trying to see what goes on over here this looks dirty a lot of nice planks in here here's another ladder this goes up oh this is where the airline remember the airline went forward and went down somewhere else this is where it came out and there's a big shoot here the big shoot right here plugged solid in that electrical insulator I thought I saw daylight I think it was a long ways down now this stuff is all fallen probably in one of the recent earthquakes because they've had some major earthquakes in this area a couple years ago 6.8 and a 7.1 or something like that because this was not here when the miners are working here obviously it's on their planks so yeah that's the that's the sketchy bridge area on not so great is it you just don't want to trip when you're doing this kind of stuff well that's a long wall isn't it well it it's a man-way you know but the ladder must I can't really see but it must continue unless it's filled in I don't see it after this first one do you know if you can see or not look at all the load counts the whole black dots all right let's check out this next ladder I think it ends down here where there's a section missing but I can't tell from here curious minds want to know curious minds want to know for sure this goes well you're about to find out this is a heck of a wall they build here yeah yeah I'm videoing right now yeah so he's repelling just a little bit about 12 feet or so till he gets to the next ladder okay good okay that's where it was on the ladder went down this manly over here it's only gonna piece of a matter that was a level down there so this is where I ended up this is all the way down to the main level of this mine that we've been in before yep a little hoisting right over here unfortunately it's a level that we've already been to in video so I was hoping for an intermediate level maybe right there maybe right here this is looking up into a stove got some large boulders I've come into it I'm broken out some of these stalls right here where I'm standing big-time collapsed stuff so that's an iron look up into the stove stall there really still up above me quite a ways I was wondering about this thing that's got to go back to where I was just looking to that stove so so that's not gonna go anywhere once again this is where I came from the ladder runs out I had to repel that last bit and dug back up it and now I'm going up this way I'm off rope at the second but my rope is right there so that's where I'm going this is straight up and then some alright that's looking back down the ladders I'm coming up it's kind of a struggle the ladders aren't in the greatest shape there's a huge wall here have pipes just kind of hang in there too that's other pipe right here came down tried to get me so this is looking up ladders aren't in the greatest shape but alright back up more of the sketchy ladders that I climb that thing that's sitting on one little corner over there alright here he comes back up no no I got tied up back to civilization it's not gonna carry away we do have to go up a couple levels but you're making progress so that's good okay we're heading back up might be one of those spot to explore in the stove up here possibly danger keep out one more shaft to go we'll be out we should have put that rope a little more over the middle of the shaft that big rocks there yes you did good job here comes a rope bag this was a two-stage repel requiring two ropes here comes really more up here in the stove big box it's kind of cool here the way the joints are on the side they must have really been worried about that spot oh well shoot I gotta go up there I guess alright let's go up this ladder missing a wrong or two here and there but I should be able to do it


What's up everyone it's your girl Kenzie here from Leighton Sports Cards and I am ripping 2021 Panini Follies Football Hobby 2 box full case break number 20. Pick your team. Gonna go over the teams here and we will get started. We've got Adam O. Titans, Andy C. Giants, Bernie S. Patriots, Brian S. Jags, Dan M. With the Cowboys, Rams, Vikings, Eagles, Falcons, Ravens and Steelers. David G. Bears, DeWard B. Lyons, Edgar B. Broncos, Eric K. Seahawks, Gary H. Colts, Harper B. Bangles, Packers, Panthers, Texans and Chargers, Hilton T. Saints, Hoske, Niners, E&W Chiefs, Joe, Jonah H. Cardinals, Kenny T. Bills, Matthias S. Brown, Sean M. Jets, Sean T. Washington, Stephen M. Dolphins, Tom C. Bucks and Tony F. Raiders. All right here we go everybody best of luck again all full for the night including personals so be sure to go check out all of four sprays starting tomorrow at 4 p.m. Eastern. All right first briefcase up. That was somebody else for a second. First up we've got three of five on the Jumbo letter patch of 2-2 Atwell for the Rams. Super Bowl winner 2-2. And we've got nice 10 of 10 rookie patch Kyle Pitts. Here you go Falcons. Nice one there Dent. Third of Dan, Dan M. Let's go. We've got three of 20. Rookie Otto DeWayne Eskridge. Little Scridge action. There you go Seahawks. To 20 on that one. Little Rubia or rookie Otto there. Then we've got greats to 25 Bill Romanowski. Niners. And we've got another RPA here to 20. This time for the Cardinals a Rontel Moore. Nice hit Cardinals. We'll mag that. Then we've got Vikings. Dual patch Otto to 20. Justin Jefferson. There you go Vikings on the JJ. And flawless performances going back to the Cardinals. Four of five Kurt Warner. Cardinals eating this break. Jonah H. There you go. Nice Kurt Warner. Empty. Got Diamond Guarantee here for Ruby. For the Jets Elijah Moore. New York with the Diamond Guarantee here. Elijah Moore. The rookie jump. Got a nice one here. It is 6 out of 25 on the Quad. Rookie Showcase Patches. Mack Jones. Patriots. Pats on this one. Bernie S. There you go.  That'll go with a Mac Jones RPA earlier. Look nice next to that one. There you go Bernie. And second time pulling this guy today. Nice patches as well. Two of 10. Going to the Chiefs. Joe Montana. Another one. There you go. Kansas City. KCENW. Two of 10. Nice patches there. Player war and use material. There you go. Just to certify that the diamonds in the car are real diamonds. First briefcase. Yeah it's absolutely horrible. All right. Number two. Let's see a 101. What are we at? What's the 101 counter at y'all? Is it 12 or 13? We've got nine out of 10 on the triple colored patch for the Chargers Austin Eckler. No Chargers. 13 of. Oh this is a cool one. We've got 13 of 20 dual rookie patches. Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson. Jacksonville is Brian S. and Jets is Sean M. So this will be a random at the end. 13 out of 20. We'll bag that. Then we've got to 25 on the patch auto. Bill's Devin Singletary. There you go. Nice Devin Singletary on the red, white, and blue patch. There. Bill's. Then we've got, we pulled a couple of this guy already tonight and they've been sick patches too. To 15 this time. Nigerian Nightmare. Chiefs having a nice break. Christian Akohi on the Nigerian Nightmare. You know Chiefs. Another RPA this fella. Cardinals doing very well. This break to 25. Ron Delmore. There you go. The second Ron Delmore RPA. Yeah the last one was 20. This is to 25. And the Kurt Warner. Cardinals doing very well. Flawless Flyers to 20 for the Vikings. Dalvin Cook. Vikings. I mean I wouldn't qualify the Nigerian Nightmare as he does, but to each his own. And we've got to 20 dual patch Rookie Auto Eagles. Devonte Smith. There you go. I think that's the first like inner patch auto of Devonte Smith. We pulled a lot of them. It just been like base autos. There you go. Philly. Nice one there. That is Dan M. Dan having a nice break. Dirted Dan. We'll make that one for you. All quarterbacks on the end case. Just realized that. We've got to 20 on the Ruby. Tua Takaviloa. There you go. 12 of 20. Nice Tua on the second year. All right. Up next we've got six out of 23 colored Rookie Patch Mac Jones. Bernie with another Sick Mac Jones patch. Back to back. Both in case cards too. There you go. Bernie. Geez. Six of 20. Okay, look just pulled something back. You gotta see what he pulled. He's still amped off about this. What is it? See, I don't even know what that is. Rayquaza. Rayquaza Rapid Strike. It's a cool looking card. I don't know anything about gaming. I really don't. All right. And last but not least, we've got Rookie Gem Auto to 15. Trevor Rookie Gem Signature. That is sick. Nice Trevor Lawrence. That'll do it for the second briefcase. Give me one second to set up the ring. Speaking of Trevor Lawrence, we've got a duel. Lawrence and Wilson. Again, this will be Jags and Jets. Jags and Jets here. Give me one second to set this up. Three and one. That is four times on the random. Again, whatever team is on top will get this duel card. Good luck to both teams. That's a nice one. I say four times. Here we go. Good luck. Both teams. One, two, three, four. Going to the Jags. Going to the Jags. All right. That will do it for random team number 20. We've got 201 coming up next. Thank you everybody.


th her you know i'm saying like are you because i don't at this like he's got his heart broken twice already and so we just go through the process of the motions but i'll always let him know like he's not going to be valued right now with who and what he brings to the table does that make sense and i don't want that to change because he's he's a he's a great he's a great kid you know i'm saying and i don't want a female who doesn't know who she is yet to ruin that that man that that the potentially good man so i just have that open dolly as much as i could and then i have like he has a he goes to a men's group and then he he there's the other part that he doesn't necessarily tell me with those men's groups so he he has a few men men's mentors per se yeah so as i oh your phone's breaking up yeah i can't hear you i think we lost them i think so too yeah i think we lost them um money mares i'm gonna drop you down brother um i've got another good brother in the back i see afro disciple i'm gonna pull you up real fast afro what's up man what's going on like you guys hear me that a new uh yeah yeah all right cool cool cool yeah yeah yeah all right y'all do your thing that was very enjoyable um i'm sorry what's your name again sorry about you oh jayme all right nice to meet you um i had a couple of questions for you that was just kind of on my mind um one of the things i was thinking about because you're just talking about raising a son and i was just thinking like now knowing how you are and you know the kind of person that you've grown into are you the kind of person that you would like you would like your son to be with when he gets older i would want him to be with somebody actually better than me if that makes sense um i still have flaws like you know what i'm saying because i was i was a certain age before i realized that i needed to change so what i would like to do and you know what part of our goal is is to try and help young women to create the standard as a at a younger age so that boys whose mother has raised them properly have better options right um so technically i would want him to be with somebody better than me to be honest like he may think that i'm great you know what i'm saying but he knows like things that i've done in the past like the trouble that i've been in all of that stuff because i'm honest with him is because some things are generational and i just want to make sure that he knows what he has to possibly fight in life you know i'm saying just because of his dad's dna and mine so i take responsibility for my stuff but i want him to i want him to have somebody better than me i want him to have somebody that has the same core values as him that hasn't you know been promiscuous at one point in their life you know i don't want him to walk into a situation with somebody who was revived if he doesn't have to but if he but i do want him to be able to give that person the grace if he does decide to so i try to train him for both does that make sense because we don't know what he's going to have options to no that makes great sense now also on a flip side um do you want him to be like uh his father let me guess you want to be honest like aside from his dad having the the the dark side of the moon you know i'm saying besides that actually his dad you know has great attributes that's what i always told my son you have like his dad was super smart at math great in the band my son has all of those great things so i cannot take you know so accountability for his greatness because some of those things were genetic to me you know and so he has great things from his dad but he also has sometimes the anger you know i'm saying and so those are things that we have to deal with possibility so um i don't want him to be a whole like his father you feel me but like all of the other stuff that he got from his dad cool and if he has good charm and elegance of speech whenever he gets older like his dad did cool but i don't want him to manipulate women with that does that make sense yeah the only reason i ask is like this is a conversation that i uh have with my friends and i also have with my wife from time to time because people ask um how i met my wife or how i chose her and one of the big reasons of why they choose her because i said that if i was gonna have a daughter i want her to be just like her if i have a son i want him to find someone just like her right so these are the things i just like as a community i hope that we can just start asking those questions and start putting those things out because i think as you alluded to earlier we don't vet for marriage you know we don't we don't vet for partnership we just kind of go with the flow and it keeps putting us in a bad position yeah exactly so how do we uh you know get get to a better position i think it starts with that like when you're looking at a girl yeah she's cute but if i possibly knock this chick up do i want a mini virgin of her running around and i gotta raise that absolutely not right so like the very first girl that he ever had a real crush on in junior high she actually is just like me and and she already has standards so she's not focused on dating anybody in high school and all that stuff and so she's off limits you know i'm saying but she literally like when i met like when i saw her i was like oh my god wow right it was a little it was a little scary a little bit you know what y'all wanted i keep hearing don't you want somebody like your mama right but he knows that she's off limits so the other ones that he has you know attempted to talk to there's been a variety of different you know women but none like her they didn't have a standard like she did so i would say if he was to piggyback anywhere it'd probably be initially back to that very first person when she's you know allowing herself to get to know somebody i also wanted to touch on the thing that you said earlier about white folk is you're talking about i guess uh one of your son's friends like he already knows the kind of like wife he wants to have and i don't the only problem i have with that it's like something i kind of feel like we do in our community is that we kind of mythologize white folk like they're doing shit better than us and it's like you don't want to say that huh i'm not saying that they're doing it better than us i just feel like we're not doing it at all you know and so you know because i'm doing it with him he's able to have those type of conversations with his friends like what their ideals are you know they're all on the same level educational wise and so he doesn't you know what i'm saying but it's not like that for everybody and what i i remember one time prom uh you know they were they're calling out the court or whatever every time they fought they called out a white kid they were like and they applied to this college and this college and whatever right and when they when they called out the black kids they had none of that to say and i just was really bothered that night leaving the high school you know um football game prom situation when our kids had nothing already planned then i said these these kids how do they have stuff already planned and we don't and that's why even from that night i pressed that on my sense son to make sure that at least let's have a little bit of a plan and that's all i'm not saying take away the kid from the kid but like these kids are still allowed to be children but they have a plan for their future well it's plain because i've made it into a situation where i think everyone had a much more systemic stability and i think a lot of our kids they don't have that stability so it's hard to plan when you don't have stability it's not just a choice thing where it's like i'm choosing not to go to college i'm choosing not to plan for the future i don't even know if i have a future i don't so it's like it's it's i think it's unfair to kind of compare them to people who don't have the same hurdles that we have to jump over so it's like yeah of course like you know johnny and somone can you know plan for college and marriage and all that because one um their parents probably have the money to send them they don't have to take all kinds of loans and secondly they don't have to worry about if i leave whatever like part-time job i have helping the family might help like might have everything else in flow but i don't get to just freely go out into the world as easily so it's just like when you said that i'm like they're messy too like i'm you actually said it you said they're messy too and yeah because their kids are bad too okay they get in trouble they have parties and secrets and stuff like that but again so so we see that there's a problem right you just said that some of these kids don't have hope and maybe it's the lack of hope that caused the continuous cycle that we're in because we're we have more kids without stability than we do with stability so then how do we change it the people that do have some sense are going to have to get out there in them streets and let me tell you like getting out there in the streets is not easy like a lot of my time is is consumed with community stuff like i says to somebody the other day like i'm losing money i don't mean in a bad way but i but i am and and so but to me is is is better to lose money now than to lose these children because it's that bad you know i'm saying it's really that bad for us because they don't have a hope you know and a lot of these kids they just want to graduate but then you want to graduate and do what exactly but i think you alluded to it earlier and i think first like step number one is you got to get people a stable home a stable thing to fall back on because again i noticed that within myself and with my spouse is that she grew up more stable than i did and i don't feel like i have a safety net so i approach everything with crises in my mind i approach everything with a sense of urgency and it's going to be okay everything's gonna be okay because everything's always been okay i got kicked out of the house and had to like sleep in my car she never understood what that kind of lifestyle is like so for her it's just like why do you act like everything's so dire so i think the the number one thing for a lot of these kids is like to give them a very soft place to land like it might not work outside but you can come back here and figure things out and then go back out and try again not this if it doesn't work out now i'm dead kind of act like you know right right right it's that it's the grace that we lack you know i'm saying like for instance somebody was like okay are you gonna make him move out at 18 and i was like i mean why why why would i do why would i just kick him out like that but he's already planning you know how he's going to function at 18 he had a head of job you know i'm saying he already had had a job so and he's looking for another job but what he wants doesn't allow him to get higher till he's 16 so he's got a couple months and he's gonna go get that job but he's already planning you know i'm saying okay but if mom if you let me stay until about this age right here this is what i can do and so if he has a plan i don't see the point on just kicking him out at 18 like somebody wanted me to just just kick him out at 18 for what other places other people don't do that like well why do we be ready to get rid of our children are they not that bad you know i'm saying to because we wanted to not we've learned to internalize our self-worth based on what other people think so that's why we can throw away our kids so we like this attitude of you should be out there working at 18 when there's nobody that i've ever seen that is successful like i work in a corporate situation everybody i work with two family households there's not these hard luck stories like yes it's once in every once in a while but out of a thousand people 999 of them had stable households most of these people were able to go to college without debt or if they had debt they had help or they had a place to stay it wasn't this thing you go out there on your own at 18 on this wow wow west should put yourself up there by your bootstraps nonsense that people love to say and again we push that more so on our men more so than i would like man up be a man go out there going to this wedding and 18 year fucking kid i don't give a shit what anyone says you're trying out yes yes so oh so okay good that makes me feel better i'm not wrong for not kicking about 18 but i'm not mothering him either like he he's right now he's rich he's he's to me he's too responsible he had his own phone bill he does all this stuff he's actually paid his phone bill of three maybe four months we went to go get his phone fixed and lady was like he had this much on the count i was like where'd you get that from but it just like he takes the little money that i give him and he he makes sure things are done before he has fun even now so i mean i think if our men would have been taught that early on you would have alleviated a lot of problems you get understand but also our women are not being taught how to handle a man like that so that's where that's where we're trying where i'm somewhat somebody gonna have to help us fill in this gap other women are gonna have to step up and we're gonna have to fill in this gap because men are starting to take accountability men are starting to change young men are starting to do what they're supposed to do and now women are you can't play victim no more after this right alan must be loving this conversation because he constantly says these are the kind of conversations we're gonna have that's going to build up the community i'm more of a black masculinist and i'm more of preserved the the mental health of black boys and men but talking to you right now i was like all right it's good to hear that's like no we also got to teach women to deal with these men the traumas they have and not just put it on men to always deal with the trauma that the women have because that's how we're socialized yeah and it's not if we did that it's so much easier right like we would be doing this like i'm gonna keep saying that we'll be doing this instead of this all the time it would be so easy like i said who doesn't want to come home and say babe i don't feel like talking today and we just really get it like i wish i could write it without her being like what did i do to you right yeah you live in my house that's funny but until we get to this level where you're like do you know your man like if he says that do you know him like okay well let me go get you some of this and get you some of this and and if i rub your feet can you remind me because i'm tired too but we don't got to say nothing oh my god all right that was perfectly all right he ended that perfectly i got nothing else to add you you that was great that was that was my purpose i'm glad you got on here because i was like who was that i was going to get on you when i got done i wasn't trying to be messy i'm just trying to you know like not to compare but we we to me if you want to be honest i think life people are great i think that we have even in the environment that we have been greeted in and the circumstances we have been given we're still great that's scary so imagine if we are given the appropriate soil to grow what that can look like well what's the soil that's the problem i think we need to like really have better conversation what's the soil like because yeah the soil is us and i think we can do things it's just um again our biggest obstacle right now that uh we have a community that won't listen to each other right our women you can't tell our women shit our men aren't um i mean let's be frank as much as i say our women aren't raised to be wider our men aren't raised to be husband-driving too many motherfuckers don't want to grow up 40 years old still out in these streets uh bragging about the chicks that they've been right right so no no there's yeah there's work to be done and i love to see the work and it's good to know that there's people willing to do yeah oh yeah we out here i'm out here in these streets for real look for real all right well again thank you again for talking to me i hope you have a good night you too you too shout out to that brother i think we have let me turn my camera on i think we have come to a natural end what what are your thoughts how do you think this went i think it's good i think i mean i i you know i don't have any complaints about anybody i think i like to see perspectives and where we are because sometimes my head is too much in the community to see like the outskirts of the situation and so this is good i think it's good i like to hear perspectives i really don't get offended i was only offended when somebody said i was abusing my child for telling the truth that's it that's the only comment that hurt my feelings i was like when did the truth become a problem but now that you put that into perspective as them thinking i was dumping emotions onto my child which was probably that's inaccurate so i get it i can see how that would be of use but no that's not how that works in my so listen jamie thank you i appreciate you i appreciate you uh lending us your time your wisdom your your receptivity you know the opening up your dms to your potential husband listen if if if if your husband is in your dms and you end up getting married and all that good stuff listen just just just just send me a text message say i'll come back i don't want no money i don't even want to invite just just be like uh you were right i'm like let me check your dms like listen i'm just saying i'm like i'm sorry i'm sorry absolutely but before i let you go do you have any final thoughts anything you want to plug anything you're working on you want to let the people know about we still have 78 people in the room yes okay so i do have a Juneteenth event that is happening and we have the ability to donate to that event it is free to the community it's a i started off with one day i got three days this year over here in this area um basketball tournament Juneteenth festival and a father's day a brunch because you know on father's days uh fathers pay for their own meal which technically is not a gift and so what we decided to do was have a brunch that the fathers don't have to pay for and they can come and relax and enjoy some spoken word and some good you know uh poetry and just chill out and relax and so we still need donations because i have to pay for stuff or we have to pay for stuff and so um i would give him the link to drop in there for the donations and hopefully that's it so that's all i need just some donations awesome yep y'all definitely um after you send me matter of fact if you could send me the link right now i'll put it up i'll put it on the screen you know i'm not being i'm not responsible right now i don't think i have it that's all good it's all you could text me after the stream and i'll add it to the description yeah i'll add it to the description under the video once it goes uh once it gets published but again thank you i appreciate you um have a good evening yes don't work too hard i'll say i'm gonna try not to okay i can't promise that but um yeah have a good week and i hope your event turns out really well y'all definitely if you can donate anything uh and also if you're in you're in uh Nashville we are in well it's tola homa Tennessee so it's a little okay little town off of uh it's about an hour from natural okay well if you're in Tennessee uh pull up on it yeah pull up on that either way i'm in Nashville too so you can pull up on it right and if you want to shoot your shot that'll be an easier way to do it instead of her DMs he there how about that but again jamie thank you so much i appreciate you have a good night you too shout out to jamie very honest sister like i said i appreciate honesty and authenticity i think that is at the very least how we can move this conversation forward not just idealism or idealistic thinking so shout out to that sister um thank you all for hanging out tonight um i gotta stop saying it's going to be a short stream because every time i say that it ends up being three hours four hours so at this point i'm just like the spirit move but um please just check the page periodically click the videos tab i promise i'm posting stuff youtube isn't telling people for whatever reason so y'all please help me out um if you haven't already get your tickets to the hundred uh for this june 24th in atlanta georgia um let's do this thing live please don't wait until the last minute go ahead and get your ticket now now if you can um and uh yeah i appreciate y'all if you guys want to reach out to me head over to instagram instagram is growing so uh feel free to follow on instagram if you aren't already um i checked the dm so if you want to contact me consider becoming a channel member consider becoming a patreon that's patreon is probably the best way to get in contact with me um but again thank y'all have a good night have a good week um peace