We're now going to take a look at a topic called Exergy or Availability. Availability in Exergy, sometimes this is referred to as looking at second law efficiencies. So what we're doing here is we're looking at processes and determining how close our process is approximating reversible process, so one without irreversibilities. And so basically what Exergy analysis enables us to do is to perform analysis of systems and determine where we can make improvements. So just to give a little bit of a review, we've looked at a number of different efficiencies thus far in the course. So we've looked at thermal efficiencies and we said that that was network output divided by total heat input. And in terms of a pictorial representation of application to a heat engine, we talked about having a source and a sink. So source is supplying the heat from a hot temperature source. The heat then flows through our heat engine and through this process we're able to extract some work out. And on the low side, we reject that heat into a sink. So that is the idea of the heat engine that we've explored thus far and we've come up with the efficiency of this. We also talked about the Carnot efficiency and the Carnot efficiencies were for reversible processes. And for the Carnot efficiency, we gave the symbol reversible after eta thermal in order to denote that this is for a reversible process. And we quantified the Carnot efficiency in terms of the temperature in Kelvin. And the last thing that we looked at with the efficiencies were the isentropic efficiencies or the adiabatic efficiencies for different components that we might have within a cycle that we're examining. And here it was things like eta t for a turbine, eta c for a compressor, eta p for a pump, and eta capital N for a nozzle. So those are some of the different efficiencies that we've looked at thus far in the course. And these are all what we can refer to as being first law efficiencies. We will now look at a different type of efficiency. And we will refer to this as being a second law efficiency. And in doing this, it will take us towards an area called exergy analysis, which enables us, like I said earlier, to compare a cycle that we might be looking at to how that cycle would be performing if it was performing without any irreversibility, so in a reversible manner.


So Arthur drops. How do you try to get guys to carry over what they're doing on the field and catch them in game? Yeah, you just keep working. I mean, it's, you know, be one thing if it was one person had a consecutive series of them, but it was, you know, unfortunately it was multiple people and it came at the critical situations. So I mean, the thing is, you don't get down on people like that. I mean, it happens once. I mean, it's you try to work through it and keep going to them and making sure that everybody's confident in what they're doing. Want to address it, but you don't want guys thinking about it too much. Yeah, I think you could, you could put it in that category as well. I mean, you got guys that you trust have really good hands and then it happens once to each of them.  But yeah, you see it all the time in different sports with free throws being one of it or, you know, batters or pitchers. Example of the stunt that they ran last week to get that sack.  Sure.  But on the flip side, unfortunately, for the NFL is things happen quick and you got to move guys around with injuries or whatever happens. So, you know, try to rationalize it. I mean, you work those things, those stunts and you got to pick them up in the process of setting plays up when you see something you want to come back to. How do you go about figuring out when is the right time? Yeah, there's a lot of factors into there, you know, the way the game's going, how they're calling things and what you have set up and when's the right time to do that?  Are there what's made Von Miller just so consistent over the years? Yeah, he's different. He's a special player. You know, those guys, you know, Ryan was in his recruiting class at A&M. He's got some pretty interesting stories about how they have an athletic freak he is, but he's he's different. You know, we played him a couple years ago here in Denver. He moves ways most guys don't his upper body sometimes doesn't look like it's connected to his loader body. So he's a heck of a challenge to prepare for in the block. How much better should the whole line get more nights in there more Taylor gets comfortable and working with Roger and what are you stressing this weekend into week six? Yeah, you're just I think everyone we're trying to stress improvement and consistency. And like I said, whether you win or lose and there's there's things you've got to fix. And you've got to improve and you're working to do it. And so and then you know, you go along with the two there may be different matchup issues going on this week. But we're just trying to get more consistent as an offense. Could you expand on just like early game philosophy? Yeah, no, we scripted but I guess I probably could have done a better dot defining, you know, some and again, I can only go from my experience with different coordinators. But if you look around, like somebody says, Hey, here's my first 15 plays like I've got everybody's different. But you have opening thoughts. And you try to stick to it. But there's things that happen, right? The first play of the game, you know, you're on on track, you get the penalty, you get the spot as a penalty. So now you're off track. And so you've got to go to something else like you may necessarily that's not the second play you'll call because something happened. It happened in the preseason opener, Philly, same thing, you wanted to call. Okay, we're fall start first and 15. Here's where we go. So you try to stick to you know where you're playing of attack. I guess what I was trying to say is it doesn't always go one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10. But you're still trying to get sure. Yeah, because you prepared. But like a game, it's a sometimes it's a chess match. Okay, this is what they're doing today. And sure, we'll adjust. And but yeah, so that that's it can definitely throw you off. And I can't speak for anybody else, you know, you have 31 other opinions. So AJ snaps, go up last week, what does it say about how he's kind of learning, you know, maybe more about the position and then simply catching the ball. Yeah, I think a lot of times when guys are productive, and as he's growing as a rookie, you try to put him in the best best spots. But we still have a good belief that receivers have done a good job. And so it just a pull of the game to and how it goes and where he's used. But yeah, as long as he keeps improving, you know, he'll keep getting more snaps. What do you think he's learning maybe in terms of whether it's block or out running or anything like that? Are you seeing strides and that? Oh, definitely. All those guys, the whole receiver group and there's not just because AJ has made some plays as it doesn't mean somebody else has done something wrong. But yeah, no, I think there's growth in it.  Get to see Munch this weekend, talk about what he's meant to your career. Yeah, so I mean, I'm a lot to be thankful for. You know, he obviously hired me here. He's a great teacher. He's a great man. And he taught me a lot about protections and one of the jobs I have with him was was drawing the protection for him. And then you meet with him at night, he put his notes in it and he's just a great person and he's a really good football coach and he's really good at what he does. And there's not a lot of guys like him. Protection philosophies are still in this playbook here. Well, there's there's a lot of I mean, you know, we've gone through a couple schematic changes, but there's certainly lessons that he he's taught me along the way that you apply no different than other coaches are for but but Munch is really good at what he does. He's staying in touch with him. We do. I mean, he's not a I see him. You see him at these NFL events and they talked to him once in summer. See how he's doing. You've been coaching Delaney obviously a long time, right? Snaps are down for him this year when you look back at 2017. That just a function of game plan or or is he 100% health wise? No, I you know, a lot of that is a situation on how the games are going. And so there's certain packages we have men and if something is working, we may stay heavy and one thing or we may go to something else.  He understands that and he knows where he's at. And a lot of it too when it's all it's all situational in game plan based. And in some games, like I said, I mean the Jacksonville game obviously snaps are up, but you don't really want to be in that two minutes situation that long. Usually you're losing. I mean, you go back to the is 94 year catch season, not 94 year, but 94 catch season. We weren't very good. And we played a lot of two minute and he got a lot of balls. And then the next year we were much better in his catch percentage went down, but he was extremely productive in both years. So sometimes, you know, that you get those stats and it's like you compare some, you know, the guys that average a lot of a lot of points on a bad basketball team, they may, you know, you don't want to you want to find a fine line of balance. And he's a very productive player. And you know, it's just unfortunate some of these games, depending on how we're going. So and it's really productive. And then you find yourself in scenarios where you're not in a lot of two minutes. Isn't there an obligation to find another way to get a ball? Yeah, you're always finding ways. I mean, that's that's it goes back to the questions about, you know, Corey early in the year. He may be the primary on a play, but the ball may not go there because the coverage dictated they may they may have tried it and you go to the second read, but it doesn't necessarily mean that like just because the targets on the stat sheet, there's things that are called for guys, just necessarily it happened to the second read or third read or, you know, something happened on the play. Would you expect over the course of 16 games then for those numbers to kind of round out to where you would envision them? Sure, sure. As you plan, I mean, as you go, and obviously things happen during the season, but yeah, absolutely. You evaluate quarterback play after five games. I mean, it's the same, you know, from week to week, you know, just it's you evaluate consistency, the stuff we may have asked him to do. And like I said, I mean, that's it's the toughest position in sports because it's like this job. Like you know what you step in for, like you know what you signed up for. But at the same time, there may be things we ask him to do week to week. That may, you know, there may be different, you know, our plan from protection standpoint or how we're trying to attack them. And so I know a lot of times people look at it like, oh, he should have done this or should have done that. Well, you may not know what we have told them behind the scenes. And Marcus has been consistent. And we like every position, we're just asking these guys to get better. That's all we that's all we're asking for.


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we will use the properties of similarity of transformations to establish the angle-angle criterion for two triangles to be similar. Now we know similar figures are those figures which have same shape but different size. Now, there is only one transformation which presents shape but does not present size and that transformation does dilution. Thus, we will use dilution to prove the angle-angle criterion of similarity of two triangles. Now let us draw triangle ABC with any measure of angle B at 60 degrees, measure of angle C at 45 degrees, also the angle is equal to 4 centimeters, BC is equal to 3 centimeters and CA is equal to 5 centimeters. So, this is triangle ABC. Now we will draw another triangle PQR which is larger than the triangle ABC such that measure of angle Q is equal to measure of angle B and measure of angle R is equal to measure of angle C. So, we have drawn larger triangle PQR taking PQ is equal to 8 centimeters, QR is equal to 6 centimeters and RP is equal to 10 centimeters and here angle Q is equal to angle B that is 60 degrees and angle R is equal to angle AC that is 45 degrees. Now inside triangle PQR, draw a line segment Q dash R dash parallel to QR such that Q dash R dash is equal to BC is equal to 3 centimeters. So, here we have drawn line segment Q dash R dash parallel to line segment QR and length of this line segment is 3 centimeters. Now we will draw measure of angle Q dash is equal to measure of angle Q and measure of angle R dash is equal to measure of angle R thus angle Q dash is equal to 60 degrees and angle R dash is equal to 45 degrees and we have extended the two rays till they meet each other. Now we label this point of intersection as P dash. Now we see that we have another triangle P dash Q dash R dash such that measure of angle Q dash is equal to 45 degrees. Now we join the corresponding vertices of the two triangles that is triangle PQR and triangle P dash Q dash R dash using line segments. So, we have joined the corresponding vertices of the two triangles using line segments and then we extend these line segments. Now when we extend these line segments we see that these line segments that is these three line segments intersect at one point. Let us label this point as A. So, we have three triangle angles triangle ABC triangle PQR and triangle P dash Q dash R dash. Now let us find measure of angle P. Now we know that in a triangle some of our angles is 180 degrees.  This further implies angle P plus 105 degrees is equal to 180 degrees which implies angle P is equal to 180 degrees minus 105 degrees which is equal to 75 degrees. So, angle P is 75 degrees. Similarly, we can find measure of angle P dash.  This implies angle P dash plus 60 degrees plus 45 degrees is equal to 180 degrees which implies angle P dash plus 105 degrees is equal to 180 degrees. This implies angle P dash is equal to 180 degrees minus 105 degrees which is 75 degrees. So measure of angle P is equal to measure of angle P dash also by construction measure of angle Q is equal to measure of angle Q dash and measure of angle R is equal to measure of angle R dash so corresponding angles are equal. Also we have measure of angle A as 75 degrees now when we measure the size of triangle P dash Q dash R dash we see that P dash Q dash is equal to A G is equal to 4 centimeters P dash is equal to C A is equal to 5 centimeters. This is because the corresponding angles of the two triangles are equal.  Now we see that ratio P dash Q dash upon P Q is equal to 4 centimeters which is equal to 1 upon 2 also ratio Q dash R dash upon Q R is equal to 3 upon 6 that is again 1 upon 2 then ratio. R dash P dash upon R P is equal to 5 upon 10 which is also 1 upon 2 so we see that ratio of corresponding sides is also same thus corresponding sides are proportional. From this construction we observe that triangle P dash Q dash R dash is a dilated image of triangle P Q R which center O such that the corresponding angles of two triangles are equal and the corresponding sides of two triangles are proportional with skin factor 1 upon 2 thus triangle P Q R is similar to triangle P dash Q dash R dash thus from this activity we see that we have taken only two corresponding angles equal that is ratio of angle Q dash is equal to measure of angle Q and measure of angle R dash is equal to measure of angle R and we get a similar triangle P dash Q dash R dash thus we conclude that when two corresponding angles are equal for two different triangles then the two triangles are similar. So in this fashion we have learnt to establish angle angle criterion for two similar triangle using transformations and let's complete the fashion hope you all have enjoyed the fashion.


The teaching idea we'll use for the present continuous use for future arrangements is nearly identical to the activity used for the future continuous. Again, we'll give our students diaries, we'll pair them up, and between the two of them they have to ask each other questions and find the day upon which both of them can meet. The big difference here will be that we'll ask our students to form their questions and their answers in the present continuous tense. So this student may hear a question such as, what are you doing on the 14th? This student would respond with, I'm attending a conference. This will occur until the students find the day upon which they can meet. As you may have noticed, there are quite a few activities which utilize a planner. These planners or diaries are particularly useful for practicing the future tense and the past tense. Of course, for the past tense we would use planners or diaries from the week previous, and for the future tenses we'll use planners and diaries for next week or next month.


I find that there's so many among objectivists who get very discouraged and very depressed so easily and I think it relates to the point you just made of the world as it is and what we can do about it. And so, and I do think there's a there's I don't know how accurate this concept is but I like the idea of being a rationally optimistic. And even though what we really hope that is is is is realistic but but but but I think with a positive perspective on the world because I think there's a lot in the world that is positive. I'm curious what you think about that, and how you keep a people ask me this all the time so I'm going to ask you how you keep kind of a positive frame of mind given. I think we agree in politics would be on a lot of things that things are really bad. I mean in culturally that there's a lot of bad things going on and the really problems that while we were certainly not in the dark ages was we're still fighting to prevent that from happening one day because we don't know what's going to happen. How do you keep that positive perspective. Given the world in which we live and given the ideas that we hold. Let me say, I've always tended to be more on the positive side, and I'll say why I have been but I just want to say first as contact through this. I think that America is in way worse shape than I thought it was three years ago. I think I was thought it was better than it was three years ago, and I think events since have shown me that it. There were more cracks than I thought there were then they were bigger than I thought they were then and they've gotten a lot worse since and I think the country is in a really really bad way right now. So I don't want anything I say positive to be, you know, oh everything's cool. And I also think it's more important to think about how to maintain a positive and life oriented perspective in light of revelations that things might be worse than you thought and that those revelations have shook me and they've made me think about how I want to prioritize what I do differently and what you know I haven't reached any particular decisions about them but as I think about do I want to write this paper and what's the point of it or that paper or do this podcast or whatever. These things have been in my mind that I don't yet have a, you know, fully worked out answer to those questions. You know one's always adjusting one's goals. But this has been a hard period for me. But that said, you're not the project of life isn't a project of coming into a world that's a prepared environment for you. And, you know, we should try to make prepared environment for our kids but coming into a world that's a prepared environment for you and playing a preset role that's meant to bring you happiness. And if you have that view you're never going to be happy. And you're always going to be frustrated by the world you're in that that's just not the nature of nature and the nature of human being.  What kind of a life you can make for yourself and find a way to make it and if you accept that as the problem to be solved in a human life. Then a lot of things that seem like their unfairness is and they might actually be unfair in some cases a lot of them are a lot of things that seem like unfairness is or set back. You acknowledge them as such then you just take them as part of the context in which you have to do the job of living. Whereas if you expect to be handed a world in which it's easy to have a good life. Again you're always going to be dissatisfied and then you take that whole perspective I think is important. And then when you take that perspective I mean look at the world. There is so much we could do and so much possible to us. And when would you have rather have been born. I mean in some utopia that doesn't yet exist that it's your job to help try to create a well then go sit trying to create it or in some past period and any past period that you might romanticize and might rightly romanticize because it had a lot of really good things about it. Also has a lot of really bad things about it I mean it's only in the 20s that women got the vote.   People couldn't be educated and think about you know if you watch television shows about the 50s and not to mention you know black people are people of other races and and this is not just bad for them right it's bad for you as a allegedly privileged white man. I mean who are you going to be friends with who are you going to benefit from so who are you going to train who are you going to relate to. So, just the obvious changes that the leftists would kind of focus on right in the last half century have been these race and sex one, not that everything's gotten good with those things it hasn't but certain evils have been eliminated. And those are real things you have to think about if you think about I'd rather live in the 50s when everything was better supposedly, which it wasn't something for better and somewhere where. And likewise all the technology you'd be giving up I mean how much easier it is. If the if you think the culture is worse as a whole, which it's not totally clear to me is but parts of it certainly are how much easier it is now to find the niches in it of people who you're interested in how much more entertainment than the actual content there is, even if that you can find because you can do web searches on it and good have podcast conversation. There's a lot good now. It's not clear that there's a time when things were in there's no time when things were in every way better. And in every time when they were in some ways better they were in some ways work. And if you're someone who has real values, right, things that you care about and are making your life about.  And so you can't want some other world that's nothing like it. Or that's like it only in some abstract way. I think Harry been finger somebody told the story about I ran being asked you know if some aliens came and could take her away to some totally rational future or other planet or something would she do it. There were totally capitalists there and so forth, and her answer was what she'd have to give up all the things that she loved here. And that would be my answer to I don't know if she really said that I only vaguely remember the anecdote. But you know I have a wife here and a job here and friends here and things I like that I've made in this world, and they have a kind of coherence to them and a trajectory that I think is making the world better, and making my life better. And that's what I value, not the life I would have in some utopia that I'm always, you know, complaining that this life isn't it. Yeah, and I think it's it's it's the living your life focused on those things focused on the things that you're building it's it's it's, I think it boils down to having, having a life of meaning having a life of purpose and and I think that that when people don't when they when they don't when they haven't built themselves a life that means something to them then all they do is yearn for some utopia, and a constantly frustrated and angry and disappointed in the world in which they live then they're not being selfish, they're not being self interested in the in the full sense of what that means. I think that's right and utopian longings and kind of ideals that are disconnected from anything you can do to actually reach them that you could expect to succeed at or at least make real progress at and enjoy that progress. And the idea like that is not really a value and not really an ideal it's a kind of rationalization or excuse for not making your life better.


What would a narcissistic civilization be without a narcissistic virus? COVID-19, the new variant of coronavirus, a close cousin of SARS, may well be the answer. Finally, a narcissistic virus. The latest by the authoritative science neuroscientist is that COVID-19, the coronavirus kills 0.7% of those infected. Flip this statement and you discover that 99.3% of people infected with coronavirus recover and survive. At this stage, 140,000 people had been infected and only a little over 5,000 people had died.  Only 5,000 people? This is a very narcissistic statement. Where is your empathy? Well, it may be unfortunate, but that's precisely how we calculate the virulence of a disease in medicine. It's called case fatality rate. 5,000 people died. That's a small number. All of them have been above the age of 50 and with pre-existing conditions, known as comorbidities. They had heart disease, they had diabetes, metabolic disorder. Compare this pretty harmless virus to the flu. The flu virus, in the same period, decimated 30,000 people, killed 30,000 people in the United States alone. The measures adopted by governments, communities and individuals the world over are far more dangerous and detrimental than this virus or any other virus can ever be. Let's compare this virus to a few others. Why do we have this mass psychosis, mass global hysteria, unmitigated panic? What people in the 19th century used to call mass delusion. Why this reaction? The only comparable reaction I can think of happened a few centuries ago, 14th century, to be precise. When a minor bacterium caused the bubonic plague, the bubonic plague came later to be known as the black death because it had killed off one third to one half the population of Europe. Now there's a reason for panic. The Spanish flu, fast forward four centuries, Spanish flu in 1918, 1920, killed between 50 million, yes you heard correctly, 50 million, five zero million and a hundred million within two years. All over the world by the way, it was a pandemic. People were dying like flies, so many of them that the authorities stopped counting and that's why we don't know the exact figure. Eight, only five decades ago, infected 45 million people and millions died before any treatment was found. And then a few years ago there was swine flu, remember swine flu? It infected 61 million Americans and killed 12,000 of them and globally it relegated 600,000 to the afterlife. And then there was SARS in 2002, 2004. SARS had a case fatality rate which was 10 times to 15 times higher than COVID-19, the current hapless coronavirus. Yet in all these pandemics, and I'm old enough to remember quite a few, there was no hint of panic, there was no hysterical self-regulation, no government imposed a quarantine, there were no travel restrictions. So what gives? Why now? What on earth has happened to us? I think the answer is an affluent confluence of four factors. Number one, ignorance. Functional illiteracy is at an all-time high. The education system had all but crumbled. People don't know how to read. People don't want to read. People play video games. They watch girls peeling bananas on Instagram or cats jumping off hot tin roofs on YouTube. That's what people do nowadays. They forgot the art and craft and skill of reading and learning. They're also resistant to learning because they know everything. They're grandiose. Number two, social media. Fake news, rank nonsense, and conspiracy theories are the only pseudo-intellectual diet of most people. There are 2.6 billion people on social media. And then there's distrust of authority. People distrust the government. They don't believe experts. They don't listen to doctors. They suspect pharmaceutical companies, laboratories, and universities. They attribute conspiracy theories to politicians and the media.  Take for example the fact that washing hands is good. But masks, face masks, actually increase the risk of contracting the virus by trapping the virus behind the mask. And yet, 99% of the advice online by self-styled experts and so on, and of course by your next door neighbor, is to wear a mask, which herds of people do, they ship off. You can see them all around you, wearing masks, complacent and happy in their self-protecting measures. And of course, how can we not mention narcissism? This is the age of narcissism. It's a narcissistic civilization, fast becoming psychopathic. Infatuation with one's self leads to extreme risk aversion. We're trying to avoid any and all risks. We are, we apply inordinate measures of pampering, self-medication and self-protection. We treat ourselves with kid gloves. We are such a treasure. We are so amazing, so unique. There are giants inside us. We can do anything we want. Didn't you listen to online coaches and other gurus? They've been telling you this for decades. People consider their existence to be cosmically significant. They value themselves as unprecedentedly unique. Their lives are treasured and worthy of the utmost efforts in self-preservation. Self-love, malignant self-love. And this is what we are facing today. And this is the source of the panic and the mass hysteria. And let's hope we survive, not the virus, but ourselves.


Hey guys, it's MJ, the student secretary, and in this video I want to quickly explain SRI.  But let's start off with a definition. SRI is any issue that may not have a short term impact, but could have a significant negative or positive impact for asset owners in the long term. So what I want you to take away from that is that it's long term focused and there is a big financial impact, and this is probably the most important part, is that it's a moral judgment and an investment judgment. A lot of people think that SRI, it's either we're going to go for investing in the right thing or we're going to be investing in what's profitable. But SRI says it must be both profitable and sustainable. Now SRI can be divided into three broad groups, environment, social, and governance. And what I want to do for the rest of this video is just go through each of these three. So let's look at environment. What do we mean by environment? Well, we want to look at investing in companies that have got a good recycling policy, that have a low carbon footprint, and that are protecting the ecosystem. Why? Because in the long term they might get a massive legal case that sues them and absolutely decimates their balance sheet. And also we don't want to stuff up the earth with global warming and climate change and all of that type of stuff. Okay, next let's look at social. Social, it's positive for the community. So this means no tobacco shares, alcohol shares are very risky, gambling shares, pornography, all of those things are seen as negative for the community. In the companies they need to have a safe work environment and good labor laws and they also need to treat customers fairly. Again, one of the big massive risks that could come across from them not doing this is a big legal case suing them for millions and millions of dollars for doing something wrong for killing someone or someone dying on their job or someone dying from using the product. You know, there is massive consequences for that. And then finally I want to quickly look at governance. What do we mean by governance? Governance is how is the company structured, who controls it? Essentially you want the CEO and the chairman to be separate. This is just to dissolve the fact that too much power might be on an individual. What you also want is that they welcome board voting from outside shareholders to make sure that their incentives are aligned and we want to see transparency when it comes to reporting, making sure that they're disclosing all the things that they're doing. There's a little sneaky sneaky backdoor deals going on, bribery and all that type of stuff. And basically in a nutshell, SRI, it's all about capitalism and it's the whole idea that capitalism can be good. And the message is to only invest in companies doing the right thing. Now this can get a little bit confusing in what is the right thing, especially around say like an alcohol producing company, you know, there is a little bit of gray area, but generally you should be able to tell when something is right and when something is wrong because as actuaries we should have developed, you know, the ability of discernment. But essentially that is SRI. Quickly explained. If you have any questions, let me know in the comment section below. Thanks guys. Cheers.


Human trafficking and forced child labour, these are global problems. Children are made to work under extreme conditions wherever they're told to go. In gold mines, or in cocoa plantations, or in the fishing industry, some of these children are as young as five years old. Children are fragile, children have to be protected, because the Convention of United Nations on the Rights of Children protects them in the hands of the children. And we have to support them here. We have to work in this direction so that a child can really find all his wealth, all his fundamental rights, and be respected everywhere he finds himself. When we see children involved in the construction of traditional houses, when we see children involved in the manufacture of feral drinks, children involved in the production of coal, but these are unacceptable. And this operation has allowed us to see that there are still all kinds of phenomena that we will have to tackle. Those children's human rights are gone, because they're controlled totally. They are totally dependent on the person who has brought them there. Then they become totally dependent on the person who makes them do the work. And then they become totally dependent even on themselves for just basic survival. It is only through partnerships that we can tackle this form of modern day slavery. No one country or organisation can address these problems alone. By combining our resources, combining our strengths, combining our will, we can work together to save innocent victims from losing their childhood. This was why in June 2015, Interpol launched Project Akoma to unite efforts across West Africa to combat child labour. I think it is a project of a newbie, a newbie in the sense of an immediate collaboration between Interpol, OEM and even with the government partners, UNJs and so on. So I think that this holistic approach, this integrated approach will give the results. It was through this united effort involving the government, health workers, the IOM and law enforcement that 48 children were rescued and 22 people arrested, sending a strong message to the traffickers. But if you traffic these children in there will be a police response and from that you get prevention and from that you get protection and from that you can see very clear partnership. How can you play a role in helping to stop child labour? How can you help protect the next generation? If we are going to make a change, we need to start with the children and we need to start now because in just a few years they won't be children anymore.


Bring our men back. Relatives of Tatarstan conscripts demand their removal from assault groups. Relatives of soldiers from Tatarstan have released a video message expressing concerns that their loved ones are being sent to engage in an offensive against armed forces of Ukraine positions in the Sfatovsky direction Luhansk region. The Kiev Post media outlet reported this. This appears to relate specifically to the second battalion 1234th Regiment in military unit 29660. In the video, a young man from the battalion speaks out, revealing that the unit has primarily been dedicated to defensive operations for the past two years. However, a recent shift has seen one portion of the battalion redirected to participate in an offensive while the remainder is preparing to follow suit in the coming days. This tactical change has come at a significant cost as the battalion has suffered what the speaker refers to as colossal losses. We are not opposed to defending our country and fulfilling our constitutional duty. We kindly request that the orders of Supreme Commander Vladimir Putin and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu be reconsidered. The mobilized soldiers should be assigned to defensive roles rather than placed on the front lines. The video message concludes with a plea, bring our men back. According to the recent ISW report, Russian forces conducted offensive operations along the Kupiansk-Svatov-Kremena line near Bakhmut along the Avdeevka-Denetsk city line in the western-Denetsk-Eastern-Zaporizia region border area and in western-Zaporizia region.


Okay, time to talk Gillett Games this week's preview, joining us to look at the games involving the North West Side, some delighted to say, if there is news, Daryon Mankaharokian. Gahar, you're welcome to Heiling Radio once again. Thanks for having me, Oisin. I suppose, first of all, Gahar, before we actually look at the games this weekend in the series, two of the National League, what did you go to the matches that you seen last week? What stood out for you? I think probably what stood out for a lot of people was David Clifford and Kerry, you know, to rack up 4-21 is some scoring against any team. Never mind a good Galway side and it was the style of play that indicated, you know, they've maybe learned that last year was a massive mistake in terms of the way they went and we might see a free-flowing Kerry again back to sort of what we expect from them. I suppose all eyes were on Tyrone Dunningall in terms of style and what would change and what would happen there, but it ended up being Kerry that sort of stole the shoe. But there was a fair wee bit of change in Oma as well that you would have noticed and I think a bit of heart for Tyrone to be honest. Out of that game as much as they nearly feel they would have left it behind and they made mistakes and the red card was obviously very costly, but I think they'll have gone away from that, not really caring about two league points and quite content that some of the stuff that they were trying to implement and put in place worked fairly well for them in terms of a first day out because for them there's no doubt that down the line the big challenge is you're surfing Dunningall and finding ways to do that and that's what they've struggled with in the last couple of years and that's what they're going to need to do more likely than not if they're going to win Ulster and go on and knock a championship. So I think they'll have been wee bit heartened by it. From a Dunningall point of view, what did you take out of their performance? Yep. What was there much to take out of it? Probably not an awful pile to be honest. Dunningall you kind of got what you expected to get if you know what I mean like obviously the biggest thing probably was the sharpness and the freshness and the brilliance of Murphy and in the flip side of the positives for Tyrone that's a massive negative because they've struggled with them over the last four or five years. They don't really know what to do with them. They had hoped obviously that if Poder Camsy was fully fit and flying that he would maybe replicate the performance of I think it was 2017 when he put a good shackle on Murphy but Camsy is going well and he just he really couldn't cope with the smarts and the physicality and the man strength of Michael Murphy like you can lift all the weights and make yourself massive out of the gym all you like but Michael Murphy just has natural man strength as the man would call it like and that's very very hard to cope with when he has the brain to go along with it and for Tyrone that'll be the biggest issue and for Dunningall that'll be the biggest positive out of the weekend that you know these boys still no matter what they do they still don't really have anything that can deal with Murphy especially if he goes inside he's a big threat for them at times and I just think that you know other than that you didn't probably learn a pile a bit Dunningall they looked alright they looked sharp enough they won the game they worked it well when they had the spare man they probably were just marching to the better side but I don't think we learned a pile about them Will Monaghan this coming weekend have their hands full with Michael Murphy and Dunningall in Balbofé? Do you feel clear? You watched Monaghan last week in that defeat to Arma? I did it was Adam and Brewster Park on Sunday and to be honest I think Monaghan will have their hands full with Dunningall in general Murphy who picks up Michael Murphy at the minute Connor Boyle was it full back for Monaghan you know some of that rate has become a very good player for them but he looked sluggish on Sunday he didn't quite look at the pace of it he struggled with the pace of the game their back seven was strong their back seven in terms of personnel they were they were experienced and they were well stacked at the back their front seven was weak and very inexperienced and very light physically so do you know if that Monaghan team I would expect at least three if not four of the fellas that came off the bench Darren Hughes, Kieran Hughes, Connor McManus, Fenton Kelly all came off the bench on Sunday they drew Wiley, Colin Walsh, Jack McCarron all not talked out but were there I would expect at least three or four of them to come into the team if not if they don't come into the team I think it'll be a comfortable evening for Dunningall to be honest on the basis of what I saw from Monaghan I wouldn't see that Monaghan team troubling Dunningall too greatly but if it's a stronger Monaghan team if those three or four fellas are back and well then we sort of know what Monaghan Dunningall games have been like over the last decade nearly that there's there's not often been an awful pile to choose between them so but Monaghan weren't at it they weren't sharp they weren't fresh they didn't look they looked like a side that was behind physically they looked obviously missing the leaders in attack and they'd been disappointed with what they got from a couple of other players as well and you know whipped Niall Cairns and Connor McCarthy off at half time which was interesting given that they were the only two experienced men they had for me at up the rest were all fledgling like and those were the two that they whipped up with which I thought was you know telling in terms of you know having no mercy but now Monaghan to me are still definitely we've got off it. Obviously the other game in division one north on Saturday sees Armaa against Tarone and Paul Donahue put on a big shift for Tarone at the weekend he's been a he's been a class find he of course was the Dunnan star last year in the championship how's Armaa going to go about trying to handle him Keher? Yep well to be honest Armaa have a couple of options there like Armaa aren't too badly off in the in the line of of man-marking defenders I think without having studied in any great depth I would imagine if I was in Cairn McGinney shoes I would think of Aiden Forker because he's that kind of a player and he'd also want to take Donahue run Forker will want to make Donahue test him out and see if he can defend Forker scored three points for play on Sunday two of them coming from full corner centre half back wherever he happened to be at the time he was moving about but I think that'll be the way that Armaa will go and that's the way that Armaa go about it you know they do they try and put teams on the back foot they were they weren't brilliant on Sunday I would have expected looking at the two teams in favour that Armaa would have won that game more comfortably They were 1-3 to no score up inside eight minutes and you know I suppose that's where they've learning to do I don't think if Donahue had ever gotten that position or Tarone had ever gotten that position against that modern team they would have allowed it to get to the point where it was 1-11 a piece with an hour gone and they were playing into a wind fair play to them credit to them that they actually went on then and won it and they were the better side but I just probably indicated what learning Armaa still have to do in Division 1 football and these are going to be the two real big games for them they would have eyed up them on in game they would have felt they had to win it but Tarone are a team that have lamped Armaa a couple of times in bigger games when they've met them Donahue all obviously lamped them last year in the semifinal and have been you know a fair wee distance ahead of them so we'll know a lot more about Armaa in two weeks time then we do at the moment Yeah let's move on to Division 3 Dairy off to a winning start against Longford it was a sort of a training day for Rory Gallagher side then at Pierce Park last Sunday but there's different opposition now to come this weekend and it's set up very very nicely with for Manowanian at the weekend it is of course Rory Gallagher's native county they're coming to Celtic Park they're coming to your back door so they are here and has this one set up really really nicely so it is It is you know the Dairy result in Longford raised a few eyebrows certainly within Dairy because Dairy had won on Pierce Park in 19 years it's not a place that they've enjoyed going it's not a Longford or not a team that they have a good record against and you know the manner and the margin of the victory was very very impressive Dairy looked sharp they looked fit they looked hungry they looked to have a wee bit about them in attack What Longford brought was probably minimal enough but Dairy had had a decent result in a challenge game against Manowan the week before as well a bit Manowan and you know just you know quietly sort of chip along nicely and will be fancy and really now fancy and getting out of Division 3 given that you know before a ball was kicked you would have said Kevin but Kevin looked lifeless enough against for Manow down in Brewster Park and didn't really deserve to win the game For Manow coming to your back on Saturday afternoon and I suppose the biggest thing they are bringing with them is a fresh and rejuvenated John Quigley I mean he literally physically looks about half the man that he was he's in the shape of his life kicked 9 points against Kevin on the weekend and you know for Manow have always been some of their parts in terms of the you know they tend to maximise their 1 to 12 and they're a good side but they would just badly lack a real score and forward a real score and threat and Quigley looks like he might be able to give that to them for the first time in a long time and if they have that then they're a dangerous opposition Again they're not a side that they're at a handy run against and I don't think they will get it too handy on Saturday but they do look to be well at themselves they're at the moment they do look to be modern well and I would think that they'll really fancy a jump up out of the league One other standout tie this coming weekend is Dublin against Kerry both sides of course one in division one south last week and the big question got into this one is can the Clifford brother Starr again can they do damage to the All Ireland champions can they? Absolutely I suppose David is the more known of the two in terms of the Dublin defence and how they deal with them they've obviously in the first All Ireland final in 2019 they tried Johnny Cooper and it didn't work Cooper ended up sent off and for the rest of it then it was Mick Fitzsimmons which worked a lot better so that's what it'll be presuming Fitzsimmons plays it'll be him on Clifford on David Clifford What to do with potty is hard to know but it's it's as much about the style of the game as anything how Kerry approach it whether they just say look we're going to have a real cut off Dublin here because you know there's been a wee bit of a narrative now you know right so Kerry went and stuffed Galway scored 421 on them we're back to see in the real Kerry and this is the way they're going to play and this is how they put it up to Dublin in the final in 2019 which isn't strictly true at all you know you watch those games back those two finals in 2019 like Kerry played very very much on the counter attack that day and were brilliant for long spells of those both games by dropping bodies in and really hitting Dublin on the break that was what they did and so it'll be interesting to see in terms of how Kerry tactically approach it whether they decide you know nearly just to test themselves out defensively and allow Dublin space and maybe not go as deep as that that's really what you're looking for on Saturday the result you know Kerry have taken a couple of scalps off Dublin in the league in the last few years beat them in the league final beat them in a league game down in Traleigh you know that they have beaten Dublin so the idea that they really really need to beat Dublin is kind of lost a wee bit they don't really really need to be Dublin but what they need is a performance and to see certain things out of the game that they can take forward into you know what looks like an inevitable championship meeting at some point down the line listen Kerry as always thanks for joining us on Highland and this week on our GA preview and enjoy the matches you're attending at the weekend good morning thanks


One of the self-styled experts who constantly plagiarizes my work once asked me Can you summarize a narcissist's life in under 30 seconds? I took it as a challenge to my grandiosity and I answered yes And here we go The narcissist is born as a cutest pilp-pillon cutie pie He's a baby and then he's traumatized and abused by parental figures Sometimes by peers or role models. There are many forms of abuse Remember spoiling, pampering, idolizing and pedestalizing are also forms of abuse because they instrumentalize and objectify the child So many $10 words Out goes the pilp-pillon and in comes the adult Narcissist this is the adult narcissist is happy. Go lucky He believes himself to be godlike and he looks for an intimate partner someone to Entrain which is a fancy word for brainwashing someone to entrain and to convert her into a figment of his shared Fantasy and this lasts for two three decades Out go these decades and this is the narcissist in his final years This is a cap which is intended to fend off Reality as you see this narcissist can no longer see what's happening around him He is deep into his mind the shared fantasy to cover He grows a very long white beard because that's how God look looks like in the Renaissance paintings and then He dies How did I do? The narcissist life in under 30 seconds, but in under two minutes actually, but Today we're going to discuss something that keeps recurring in the narcissist life early late and final stages and this is Frustration aggression not to remind you. There was a guy named dollard who in 1933 Proposed the frustration aggression hypothesis, which says simply that when you're frustrated You would tend to convert your frustration into aggression as we say today da Vuh, okay The narcissist handles Frustration very differently unlike healthy people as far as narcissists is concerned Any frustration is perceived as narcissistic injury and if the narcissists were to be frustrated in public That would constitute narcissistic modification The narcissist definition of frustration is also unusual It is any attempt to disagree with the narcissist criticizing Confront him limit his desires and urges not succumb to his wishes Not cater to his needs say not to him or even Possess boundaries if you are independent if you're autonomous if you're a gentek if you're boundary you cause the narcissist's frustration and he perceives it as a malevolent form of Opposition kind of narcissistic injury inflicted on purpose you are torturing him and this first perception of frustration as Narcissistic injury and modification Creates a lot of apprehension in the narcissist the narcissist is terrified of Being frustrated he anticipates frustration He catastrophizes it and this generates in him intolerable anxiety and stress When the narcissist is exposed to mounting amounts of anxiety and stress He decompensates in other words all his defenses shut down Including the infantile primitive defenses and especially the false self He becomes denuded of his defenses skinless defenseless and Clinically speaking the narcissist becomes a borderline. He switches in my work. He switches to a borderline self-state and He emotionally Disregulates and even acts out Exactly as a borderline does So when you see a narcissist frustrated anxious rageful Opposed confronted and Denied you see a narcissist who is fast becoming a borderline He would lash out. He would throw temper tantrums. He would emotionally dysregulate He would feel swamped by his own negative affectivity Anger envy hatred even and so on and this could push the narcissist Exactly as the it does the borderline. It could push the narcissist to become a secondary psychopath a Psychopath actually the borderline becomes a secondary psychopath because she possesses empathy and access to positive emotions The narcissist becomes a primary psychopath So let me clarify this because I've I misspoke a minute ago When the narcissist is faced with stress and anxiety and frustration the narcissist transitions Sometimes depending on the extent the narcissist transitions sometimes into a borderline state His defenses shut down and he emotionally dysregulates if the condition if the environment The frustrating environment persists the narcissist transitions to a primary Psychopathic state he becomes a psychopath the borderline transitions to a secondary psychopathic state So both the borderline and the narcissist they have a low frustration threshold Low tolerance for frustration and this leads the narcissist to desperate attempts To eliminate the source of frustration in the case of the narcissist frustration does breed aggression But in healthy people the aggression is intended to signal displeasure discomfort and Modify the other parties behavior When you're frustrated and if you're mentally healthy relatively speaking Your aggression would be intended to change the behavior of the person who is frustrating you Or to modify the environment in a way which would reduce reduce frustration It's not the case with the narcissist The narcissist aggression is externalized It's reckless It often culminates in verbal or physical violence And this is the process known as coercive snapshotting The narcissist aggression is intended to try to force you To conform to his expectations of you To try to force you to coalesce with to merge with with the internal object in his mind that represents you He wants you the narcissist wants you to stop existing outside his mind and to fuse Symbiotically with the object in his mind that represents you and this way of course to eliminate the frustration and if you refuse If you refuse to shut up if you refuse to succumb if you refuse to be submissive If you refuse to be obedient if you insist on your independence and personal autonomy and agency and self efficacy If you walk away if you in any of these cases the narcissist would try To act in a way that would either eradicate you obliterate you eliminate you annihilate you or coerce you Into behaving the way he wants to and this could culminate and escalate into physical violence definitely Narcissus perceive Perceive frustration is emanating from the inside you remember that narcissists are incapable of Perceiving external objects They're they're incapable of conceptualizing the separateness And the externality of objects. So as far as the narcissist is concerned You don't exist out there. There's no external object that is you There's only the internal object inside his mind that represents you and he Goes on interacting only with the internal object So if you frustrate the narcissist, he doesn't perceive it as coming from the outside He misperceives it as coming from the inside And his aggression is actually an attempt to reduce dissonance and anxiety By somehow Modifying you so that you again become a compliant internal object.  So the narcissist can't just Up and walk away. Say you're frustrating me. I'm gonna I'm out of here I don't want to be exposed to your frustration. So I'm out of here He can't do that because he carries you in his mind And you keep frustrating him from the inside Unless and until he gets rid of you Psychologically via in training or brainwashing physically Through violence or by coercing you to behave in a way Which does not challenge undermining and contradict the internal object unless he accomplishes one of these three solutions He the frustration the nagging frustration is going to persist Because it emanates comes from the internal object In his mind that represents you Your avatar is attacking him from the inside like some kind of trojan horse or fifth column Now I mentioned that the narcissist transitions to a borderline self state Under conditions of extreme duress stress and tension and anxiety The borderline self state is impulsive and destructive That is the famous narcissistic rage attacks the temper tantrums. They are actually A borderline self state not a narcissistic self state So more appropriately it wouldn't be called narcissistic rage, but borderline rage or dysregulated rage Ah coffee in the morning The psychopathic cold state Which in the narcissist is a primary psychopathic self state the classic psychopath is called Premeditated ruthless callous relentless Inhumanly dis empathic no empathy there Both the borderline state and the psychopath the primary psychopath self state A fantasy oriented because narcissism is a fantasy defense Gun haywire gun awry So everything is infused with fantasy. Even these self states are fantastic And they involve impaired reality testing but The psychopathic self state in the narcissist Is truly terrifying Think Chris Watts It's a truly terrifying state It's preceded by a covert state So when the narcissist transitions under stress under anxiety as a result of frustration mortification extreme narcissistic injury when he transitions To a borderline state and then from a borderline state or psychopathic state He goes through a covert phase There's a covert phase like a bridge between the borderline and the psychopathic state and during the covert phase He appears to be completely normal He suddenly becomes totally normal He doesn't rage He's not angry He is con he seeks consensus compromises. He's caring. He may even be loving. He is He is perfect. He's a perfect ideal partner He's a bit ponderous A bit brooding A bit spiteful somewhat passive aggressive There's there hints of sarcasm and bitterness He is determined But he is evasive He denies that there's any problem. He's overly polite pseudo civility. He's pseudo civil He is affected He is ostentatiously obedient as I said or caring and so on and throughout this Throughout this act of normalcy the mask of sanity The narcissist keeps imagining the final act of your destruction He goes into detailed planning Obtaining all the necessary tools and I'm not talking necessarily about physical violence It could be for example undermining or destroying your career It's a kind of revenge fantasy That doesn't necessarily involve your physical disappearance But definitely involves inflicting enormous damage on you Ruining you It could be for example Traumatizing you in a way that you will never recover from And this is done Sometimes very covertly Sometimes very overtly And it's very open to misinterpretation The victim often feels that she has had the upper hand or he has had the upper hand But that's a mistake The trauma is there eating away at the innards of the victim like some kind of parasite So all these revenge fantasies require a covert phase where the narcissist hides And disguises his intentions His detailed planning His premeditation His White hot A rage He's extreme hatred His conversion of your idealized object into a secretary object You become an enemy And his determination to destroy you To destroy you for good The borderline state is either sudden eruptive borderline state There's a there's calm There's no calm before the storm or the line suddenly transitions into A temper tantrum Begins to break objects This kind of thing So this is the eruptive borderline self-state And narcissists are famous for it. These are the this is the famous narcissistic rage or temper tantrums But there's another Option not the possibility There's a borderline Self-state which is not eruptive There's no calm before the storm. There's just a transition to the storm But there's another self-state another variant of borderline self-state Where there's gradual escalation In the in this particular variant of the borderline self-state of the narcissist The narcissist Wants to provoke a fight It attempts to preq to needle you to provoke you to and this is projective identification a Spoiling for a fight Is looking to create a situation or an environment Which would accommodate his alloplastic defenses where he could blame you for for starting everything So this is more of a covert strategy and very typical of covert narcissists To summarize when the narcissists is either duress or stress or anxiety or tension humiliation injury modification Narcissist transitions to a borderline self-state In the borderline self-state. He could become eruptive after a period of calm That is like the calm before the storm or he could become escalate escalatory could escalate He could create the preconditions for a fight Where he would be wherever his misconduct would be legitimized by your reactive so-called abuse And then The most narcissists not all transition to the psychopathic self-state and this is where the danger lies In the psychopathic self-state. It looks as if the conflict is over As if as if everything is back to normal As if you have nothing to worry about as if things have been resolved a concern consensus has been restored peace Truce and ceasefire have been declared but all this time all this time The narcissist is planning his revenge his payback and your destruction He's a great actor and he can deceive you into um a kind of complacency This is what happened with hamas and israel by the way okay Now the narcissist's alloplastic defenses alloplastic defenses to remind you is when you blame other people For your own behavior the consequences of your behavior. You don't accept them. You reject them You said they made me do it I acted this way because I had because I had no choice They discriminated against me. They abused me. They attacked me. I'm the victim That's alloplastic defense. The narcissist's alloplastic defenses justify the narcissist's aggression and even violence There is an external locus of control. The narcissist Attributes his motivations Misattributes his motivations to to the others to other people They He outsources his motivation. He says you made me do it Which is like saying you controlled me It's an external locus of control and this aggravates the anti social behaviors because the narcissist begins to perceive this whole thing as an issue of survival The question of survival if he doesn't prevail is going to be eradicated. He's going to die So he must win Winning becomes the be all and end all And then if he fails to win He sinks In into an extreme depressive or dysphoric mood Often accompanied by substance abuse and withdrawal or avoidance from reality Routines Daily routines or professional routines are impeded and disrupted and so on so forth. The narcissist basically falls apart This integrates and transitions gradually into a pre-psychotic stage I've discussed this in in other videos now Narcissist often use verbal and psychological abuse and violence against those closest to them intimacy breeds Abusing aggression in the narcissist because it's very threatening Narcissist dread intimacy Some narcissists move from abstract aggression The emotion leading to violence and permeating it to the physically concrete sphere of violence As they dehumanize and objectify even their nearest and dearest The narcissist aggression shifts from inanimate objects I don't know throwing cups of coffee breaking furniture slashing tires Your tires He moves from this to animate objects You people around them They don't see any distinction between inanimate and animate objects You're just an object in the narcissist mind Many narcissists don't forget are also paranoid and vindictive. That's the really really dangerous type They aim to punish by tormenting They aim to destroy the source of frustration and pain They stalk they harass This is the kind of narcissists who end up ends up murdering people or Doing away with families, you know whole family There's a typology of of revenge here the need The urge to seek revenge on on wrongdoers and evildoers. That's that's as ancient as men come And there's an argument to be made that nothing is wrong with it It's a deterrence And retaliations retaliation restores a sense of justice justice is important But people attempt to address in to address their grievances in three ways And the narcissist gets the proportions wrong Let me let me discuss this a bit. Let me elucidate this a bit The first way to to obtain revenge Or to restore justice, which is the way I look at it wiedergutmachung in in german is punitive moralistic The aim of this type of vengeance is to restore justice as I said and with it The victim's view of the world is orderly predictable structured and casual and causal So This kind of revenge has to do with a victim Not with a perpetrator The victim just wants to feel at home in the world again The victim just wants to feel that she will not become the arbitrary random capricious target of some Perpetrators should be punished victims should be soothed and elevated and society should publicly acknowledge Who is who and meet out opprobrium and saccour and punishment? Respectively, this is the punitive moralistic Attitude and this kind of revenge Um is healthy But like everything else in psychology it has a malignant variant It tends to devolve in mentally ill people it tends to devolve into an obsession It becomes intrusive uncontrolled thoughts take over And then it becomes a compulsion an irresistible urge to behave in a way that is sometimes criminal Or inconsistent with one's values Or even inconsistent with one's true wishes Incommentary with one's skills needs long-term interest capabilities were withle and so on so forth It becomes in short of revenge fantasy So this kind of revenge the punitive moralistic revenge if it is not checked by society Could become a crusade of vengeance and individuals individuals crusade of vengeance and ruin the mental health of the victim As she becomes gradually a perpetrator of her own abuse and and even crimes This kind of vengeance is unhealthy and in the long term counterproductive As it taxes the victim's Time and resources, especially mental resources. It adversely affects Her other relationships. It renders her dysfunctional and ultimately it consumes her and she becomes insane period The second type of revenge is narcissistic revenge Vindictiveness is the narcissist way of restoring his self-imputed grandiosity and of recuperating from a narcissistic injury As this is especially true in narcissistic modification and it is known as the external solution I urge you to watch my narcissistic modification videos Having fallen prey to malfeasance or to crime Or to mistreatment or even to mere confrontation or disagreement or criticism Having come across someone who is boundary and independent and does not want to become refuses to become A an element in a shared fantasy an internal object the narcissist Regards himself as having been victimized He begins to self-chastise because inside the narcissist There is a bad object inside the narcissist.  You're wrong. I'm good.  I'm gonna punish the people who have victimized me This experience starts with a humiliation The circumstances of victimhood Contrast sharply with the narcissist's inflated view of himself as omnipotent, omniscient, brilliant, shrewd, perfect and so on and so forth invincible So by bringing the alleged or perceived perpetrator or culprit to utter ruin The narcissist regains his grandiose inflated fantastic sense of self or actually regains or reactivates his false self In short when the narcissist punishes someone he perceives as a perpetrator When he punishes someone who refused to comply With his demands refused to be submissive to him obedient When he punishes someone like that someone who has humiliated him in public or in private injured him, mortified when he punishes the source of this frustration and pain He reconstitutes and regains Is the cognitive distortion of grandiosity he is again godlike he restores his divinity So whenever you by the way engage in some kind of revenge fantasy or even actions of vengeance and revenge ask yourself Is your bruised ego Is your grandiosity is your narcissism the main reason for your indignation and spite And if it is try to separate the elements of your conduct that have to do with your justified grievance And the elements of your conduct that revolve around your unhealthy narcissism Avoid The latter pursue the former Whenever you have a grievance Whenever you want to restore a sense of justice whenever you want to punish justly A perpetrator ask yourself What's the extent of my revenge fantasy? What's the extent of my retribution? My pursuit of the perpetrator Have I gone over the line? Have I myself become a narcissist and a psychopath? Is it about Restoring justice and protecting others and so or is it about my own narcissistic sadistic psychopathic gratification? You'll be surprised very often. It's the latter case And finally the strogmative restorative Revenge With this type of revenge the victim merely wishes to restore her fortunes and to reassert her rights In other words to revert the world to its erstwhile state by acting Against her perpetrator or violator decide decisively and assertively the victim says I just want the world to be back as it used to be I just want to restore everything the way it used to be And this is essentially a healthy Functional and just way of coping with the pain and damage Wrought by other people's malicious and permitted premeditated misbehavior Reparations for example compensation victim compensation all these are forms of pragmatic restorative revenge A pragmatic restorative revenge Is another name for justice It's the only healthy type The narcissist engages In the first two types punitive moralistic and narcissistic and almost never With the engages with the third type pragmatic pragmatic restorative Healthy people engage in pragmatic restorative Retribution or punishment and almost never with narcissistic Or moralizing punitive kind of revenge. So this is the distinction between narcissists and healthy people I hope this presentation has not been too aggressive and Hadn't hasn't caused you narcissistic injury and modification But if it has Feel free to go after me in a punitive moralistic narcissistic or pragmatic restorative way You choose


Hello and welcome to the session, let us work out the following problem. It says for any two vectors a and b show that 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a plus 1 plus square of magnitude of vector b is equal to 1 minus vector a dot vector b whole square plus square of magnitude of vector a plus b plus vector a cross vector b. So, let us now move on to the solution. We will start with RHS and we will first simplify RHS and we will show that it is equal to the LHS. RHS is 1 minus vector a dot vector b whole square plus square of magnitude of vector a plus vector b plus vector a cross vector b. Now this becomes 1 minus vector a dot vector b square it should be plus minus 2 into 1 into vector a dot vector b applying the formula of a minus b whole square plus. Now again here we will apply the formula of a plus b whole square or x plus y whole square where x is vector a plus vector b and y is vector a cross vector b. So, we have vector a plus vector b whole square plus vector a cross vector b whole square plus 2 into vector a plus vector b into vector a cross vector b. Now again this is equal to 1 plus vector a dot vector b square minus 2 into vector a dot vector b. Now here we will apply the formula of x plus y whole square. So, this becomes vector a square plus vector b square plus 2 into vector a into vector b into a cross b whole square. Here we have plus vector a cross vector b whole square plus 2 into vector a plus vector b into vector a cross vector b is 2 into vector a dot a cross b plus 2 into vector b dot vector a cross vector b. Now again this is equal to 1 plus vector a dot vector b is given by magnitude of vector b a into magnitude of vector b into cos theta square 2 into vector a dot vector b. Let us cancel with 2 into vector a dot vector b and here we have vector a square is square of magnitude of vector a plus square of magnitude of vector b and a cross b is given by magnitude of vector a into magnitude of vector b into sin theta into vector n where n is a unit vector perpendicular to both a and b and here we have the square of this and here we have a dot a cross b which is 0. Here also we have b dot a cross b which is also 0 as we know that a dot a cross b is 0 and we have used the identity vector a dot vector b is given by magnitude of vector a into magnitude of vector b into cos theta and vector a cross vector b is given by magnitude of vector a into magnitude of vector b into sin theta into vector n. Now again this is equal to 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a plus square of magnitude of vector b. Now taking square of magnitude of vector a into square of magnitude of vector b common, we have cos square theta into sin square theta and square of vector n dot square of vector n is 1 as we know that vector a dot vector a is 1 where a is the unit vector. So again this is equal to 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a taking square of magnitude of vector b common we have square of magnitude of vector b into 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a. Now taking 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a common we have 1 plus square of magnitude of vector a into 1 plus square of magnitude of vector b and that is what we have to prove right? So this is the LHS, hence the result is proved. So this completes the question and the session. Why for now take care, have a good day.


Okay nice enough. He just up-tecked EX grabbed! What a phenomenal read! How's it going everybody? Datodoi here back with some more Dragon Ball Fighters online matches. This time we are finally seeing the Bandai official online tournament come to a close as we have made it all the way to the final round. Now to be honest, I've completely missed, uh, forgotten how the rules work here. It looks like the finals will be single elimination, that's right. Last year or a year ago, or more than a year ago at this point, I lost my very first game and just sat there for the rest of the time. Ha ha ha ha! I don't know if it'll happen again, but it's been a blast getting up here. Can I change my team? It's good to be back. Let me get a stamp in here. I'll never forget your kindness. The thing is, most of the people in here, the people that beat me. Ha ha ha! Legendary Black, I barely count, bro. You robbed me. Hey, I didn't know the rules when you beat me for that one round. Ha ha ha! Alright, so I guess what I'm gonna do here is I'm just going to commentate the match as I watch it on stream. Oh, I'm not in the first round good. Alright, so it looks like things are off to a fast start, Bardock jumping back. Android 21 getting sucked! What a combo! Let's go, gotta tag out to Kid Buu in order to extend it. This is a very good start for your buck. He doesn't get the hit right away. No, still can't open him up in the corner. 6M, but nothing to follow it up with. Now he gets hit from a cross-up. Very, very bad for the 21 player here. Goku GT doing the damage necessary. 3 bar in range, I think. This is going to be it for Android 21. Let him know. Pound the chest, super combo. And Bardock just to finish things off, get the old Bardock point character back up and running, almost like nothing even happened. Roshi comes in. Wow, Roshi in an online tournament? I gotta give respect. Just for that fact, that is crazy to me. 7 frame delay. I don't know if that... Thunder Shock Surprise! Sleep on it, accept it for what it was, but you cannot block that. Kid Buu putting up the ball and an overhead mix. Already, Urabukti does look like a real player. He looks like he knows what's going on. He's got the Kid Buu stuff. Level 3 from Bardock here. Yeah, this is going to be difficult, man. I wish I was playing Broly. Level 3 from Bardock. What's the mix? Double overhead. Just a normal block string wants to catch Roshi doing something, but no, he makes it out of there alive. No assist were up for Bardock. Beam. Non-optimal though. Roshi going for the non-optimal. He'll take any damage he can get, but he brings it home at the end of the combo. Oh, what a cross-up from Bardock. DP from Roshi, but not going to get any good results there because Bardock just falls out. A lot of blue health as well. Doesn't look like Roshi really cares though. Maybe a sparking would be good here. I don't really know. No, it's too late now. Whatever he wanted to do with Roshi, it's out the window. So hopefully his plan was to just go live with base Goku. The anchor that he is, one of the best in the game, was sparking. Point is it's still far too early to call this over. Oh man, the neutral. I don't know if this is technically cheating because I am seeing what my opponents are doing, but I don't think they're that worried about it to be honest. Kaioken. Look at the damage, dude. This is why you can't say a game is over when base Goku's still in the, no tech? No tech. Okay. That's bad. He still has spark though, so he's not really too worried about the mix that comes next. Actually, he might have to eat a heart knocked out. Oh, he's got blue combo routes. He's doing a lot of blocking right now. He's got to be getting sick of it. He doesn't want to be here. He doesn't want to have to block all these attacks. Oh kid, boo. Oh man, that is hopefully, well in order to get matched up with against him, we'd have to win. So hopefully we do face him, but he is looking pretty dangerous. I am not good at blocking kid boo. Will this be all for base Goku? Level one comes down Bardock with a level one of GT Goku going up for the dragon fist. Beam to end it. And that is going to be the end of round one and the end of base Goku. Now remember, it's single a limb, so he's just out. He's just out of the tournament now. Oh no, PRZ. Don't call on me. Don't call on me, dude. I'm running. No, no, no, no, don't show fear. He'll definitely call me then. He'll definitely call me then. Don't show fear. Don't show fear. Just hope it's not me. I don't want to rematch against PRZ right now. We played against him in the last video. It didn't go well for us. Don't call on me. I am sitting in the back of the class right now. Goodbye, cruel world. It's such a scary team. Go tanks, buff, Goku Ultra Instinct, amazing, Broly. You know it's Broly. I'm nervous, but nerves can only last so long. Yep, this is the stage. Last time he jumped at me, I'm jumping back.  I'm already nervous. Don't early spark like we did last time. Do not do it. Don't do it to him. I got hit low. Come on. Who could have expected that? It's already looking bad. Three bars. Oh no. It's already looking really bad. Go tanks. Why? Goku, what's up? Okay. See, this is why I was afraid of Go tanks, dude. I was too nervous. Hold on. Try to drop the nerves. We still have spark. Okay, decent. Wow, he switched out. Nice. Nice enough. Wow, he got me with the overhead. It's sparking time. It is definitely sparking time now. Seven bars. It's a wonder if we'll even make it out of this alive. That is so much bar. Oh, Broly level three. Now I'm thinking about whether or not sparking is even worth it. Oh, he could make a huge read here with three bars. Okay, nice enough. He just up teched EX, grabbed. What a phenomenal read. What a man's man of a read.  It's looking bad now. It's looking bad. It's looking exceptionally bad, but I'm still gonna fight. Remember what we said against PRZ before? I'm gonna fight until the last timer count, until Bardock falls. I'm fighting. Please tell me yet a button. Okay. No, no, no. That's still not fine. That's still not fine. I thought you were gonna hit something. Three bars. It felt so good when you're... That's really, really, really bad. That is the worst. This is just in general the worst. We got to do something overcoming now.  Unless he drops it. What a bad guard cancel. There's no drops coming. It's over. No. Dude, that Broly read, I think, is what did it. What a read. Man, what a phenomenal read. All right. We are back to watch the grand finals. It has been quite some time since we lost now, but as expected, PRZ and Europe buck teased still. Sorry, I had to read the name on my phone. They are in the grand finals. I knew PRZ would make it. He got me with the wake-up Broly grab. Like I said, it's been a long time. I think it's been like an hour since my game or around that time. So, I completely almost forgot what happened, but I know we lost to PRZ. That's why I'm cheering him on specifically, but right now it's not looking too good. Kid Boo hasn't been the quarter. Wait. No. Gonna let a guard cancel get away from him like that. Now Goku GT has a very real chance at making a move to take out Gotenks. This is something. This would be a strong move. Gotenks getting out would be great for Bucket. Buck T. I feel like calling him Bucket for the rest of the game. We'll call him Buck T though. Gotenks back out and he's gone. PRZ, you can't. You can't afford to lose, man. I need to lose to the winner. I need to lose to the winner. Back it up. Don't get caught. Don't get too fancy. Buck T. Putting on a big performance. Using Dragon Flash Fist. Every chance he gets, he just wants to win neutral for free. Back down to the Kid Boo assist. This man did not come to play. Blocks of Heavy as well wants to back up, not confident with his chances against UI Goku. And maybe for a good reason UI Goku starting up another combo on him. Superdash and everything. Get him down into the corner. Not a lot of damage there. Baguette's a follow-up hit after a win for Fleck from Buck T. This is bad news for Buck T. Dragon Rush. We might see a level 2 from UI. Into a level 1 from Broly which would be enough damage. And that's exactly what we're going to see Buck T get his Goku GT taken out of the game. UI Goku also on the sidelines to recover that minimum amount of blue health. Area, run the set play. Bardock, not a fan. Gonna mash his way out. High loan mix. You gotta get it right. It's high this time around. Will we see a level 3 from Bardock here? I don't think so. No, just a level 1. Into a Kid Boo level 3. Wow. Spending a lot of bar. Maybe he wants to force that sparking out. He wants to have it last. Yeah, that's what he was hoping for. But unfortunately, PRZ not gonna give him what he wants this time. Just a lot of neutral going on. Very intense. Very intense. Ooh, the movement here. Nobody wants to get hit first. Blocks of Bardock be assisted. It's Kid Boo's chance. Vanish gets reflected. Midscreen. No assist are up. Bardock actually just came up. Never mind. Kid Boo has the assisted Vanish, but it doesn't look like he's gonna use it. Bardock actually goes down. Broly's up. Both assists are once again down. I feel like UaGoku could have won that scramble if he wanted to. Nice air to air. Watch those feet. Nobody wants to get caught by a mash. Whoa, barely got out of there in time. That's huge. Huge for Bukti and PRZ has gotta be feeling some regret there. He just didn't hit the button fast enough. UaGoku with a clean tech gonna get away with barely any life. Six M lands, but no assist to cover it up and Bardock's ready to mash. PRZ left with Broly, who is a great anchor and sparking. It's gonna matter when he hits it, though. Tries to land another grab like he did on me. He blasts coming through Kid Boo in the clutch. Auto combo. He's gotta use that spark soon. Not a lot of health. Super Armor gets it done. Level three. For sure we gotta see a level three here. God, Broly's so good. Did you see how much damage that did? Why is Broly so good? That almost killed for no reason. Honestly, yeah, I agree. I like the spark there. I like the spark with Kid Boo there. Then again, Broly is not gonna go down easy. He still has sparking available. I do think this is a huge risk, though. If he gets hit once, he's not gonna get to use that sparking. There you go. Use it right there. Not the best you could go for. He's gonna play that neutral game, killing your time. He's not able to confirm it. Kid Boo gets a hit in the scramble. Huge pickup for Bukti. Wow. Wow. It's not over yet, but it's looking like it might be ending soon. Broly with the vanish gets vanished on himself. One more hit will seal the game. Any hit will do. Six M wraps it up. Broly down for the count. I can't believe it. Great games to those two. Good job. I'm glad we were able to wrap up this tournament. I didn't get to share my feelings on the tournament because I just wanted to cut straight to grand finals to keep up the pace, but I do want to say that this was so much fun to do. Honestly, these online tournaments are always a blast. And yeah, I'm just so happy I was able to actually participate because the slots were limited. So let me know down below in the comments whether or not you like watching this kind of stuff or whether or not you think this kind of stuff is interesting for the game. Like would you considering entering the next one if they ever do another one? Other than that while you're down there, if you like these videos and the channel, make sure to hit the like button and subscribe to the channel and check out the other videos that should be on your screen right now as that really supports the channel as well. Seriously, thank you so much for supporting the channel. It's stuff like this that makes me remember that. I don't know. This is my favorite game of all time. I guess I'd never forget that, but these are always the cool reminders that this game is really something special to me. And doing this, doing this as in YouTube has been one of my favorite things in the entire world. So can't thank you enough for that as well. Other than that, I have been Dr. Doya. Thanks for Bandai for putting this on and I will see you in the next one.