Everybody for syrup in 2022 playbook football hobby eight bucks half case number 31 random teams find these results on your screen anytime Elite sports cards calm. We'll go ahead and get started now 13 to go on the next one link is in chat right now. We got a full sellout promo going We can get every break filled up tonight. We will give out $400 and break credit For people each gonna win a hundred bucks. We fill up all the breaks Start us off Washington Jersey to 199 Terry McLaurin Jumbo patch to 49 Drake London for the Falcons three colors Cowboys out on Marion Barbara to 199 Goal line grass rest in peace and a Malik Willis nice platinum the 49 on the RPA buck Titans Malik will this Titans more spashes came and they were done to 11 now Yeah, 11 ago. I'll give you the wrong link. That's contenders. Yeah, those contenders link, but here's the actual Playbook link. We got 2016 NT you guys. Let's get 2016 NT filled up That one's gonna be sick Hopefully pull something Really cool out of there some something that's cool, but like old Josh Allen dual Jersey to 199 for the bills Seven years is so long ago Donnie Rams triple patch team trios two of ten Matthew Stafford Cooper Cup and Aaron Donald and Niners goal line auto Jeff Garcia That's a name Jeff Garcia auto to 99 Eagles legend. Yeah, Brown's legends for your Niners legends Who else they play for like six other teams? Titans, maybe I don't even know Eric use a comma to 99 RPA book Titans great patch on this one Four color patch on the RPA book Dolphins obviously dolphins Those colors They look just the same. Yeah That's that Tannehill. That's what I'm thinking of That damn sass watch Ravens to 99 Kyle Hamilton on the four color rookie patch Easy easy stood a decayed madcap Jersey to 199 Seahawks Bobby trees Robert Woods auto Titans to 99 Here we go commanders 99 of 99 book and rookie signature locker Sam Howell Helmets Think that's three patches on the right a glove in the middle left and then a ball sick howl to 99 bookends rookie signature locker commanders 11 ago. Let's get that filled up you guys break in next To 75 Danny Gray rookie jumbo patch Niners. I think anyone's doubting you Jamie. It's a 49 Elaine Johnson Eagles. You know a nice hit there with the auto George Pickens rookie auto for the Steelers Now that you're here's the price. Yeah Kenneth Walker the third to 25 on the rookie patch card book You go really great patch there for role five four color you want to count the the multi-color multi-color pattern There you go Seattle very nice card it's 25 on the Walker Texan's gone on one of the contenders First contenders down to two Getting there guys. We're almost we're almost that full sell-out So close 13 to go on playbook only six teams total and contenders half cases and then 16 on national treasures 2016 2016 national treasures Falcons jumbo Jersey to 199 Debo Stefan digs bills four-color patch card to 49. That's pretty cool goal line graphs Seahawks auto Doug Baldwin to 25 It's got a clean signature. You don't see his auto alive. I see that 2016 and see later nice Baldwin and a sky more 16 of 49 RPA boat chiefs Nice sky more just sold out Next one. Let me just confirm that I think we're sold out on the on playbook Yeah, Robert s closed this breakout and close the next one out about the last 11 I hope Robert s get some break credit later If we do the full sell out It's a lot of spots right there. Yeah Yeah, it is appreciate that Robert Washington's sold in one of the contenders now. Wow, I will one on the first contenders You'll drop that link Think it's just the It's colds. I'm Ron Burgundy Josh Allen four-color patch to 25 for Buffalo Sunday's best Jonathan Taylor patch card to 25 colds Colds Say we're like that old playoffs Jerry Judy on the auto to 35 for the Broncos Culture on sale to and a Vince young. What was I'm gonna bet? Vince young to 99 patch out a book Titans I don't know what that that comes off. It might peel some off I'm gonna set a box never with a Titan spot in case you like get that off and there's like a mark that it leaves Just some adhesive Nope, Donnie. Don't do it. Don't do it, Donnie Come on shield book Colts gone to 41 lines and 42 and a 2016 NT spot. Thank you Daniel First Tendies is sold out. Oh We are getting there y'all Feel the full sell out Two more breaks of spots left contenders PYT and 2016 NT Halfway full on 2016 NT Flowing through you like the force are you feeling now mr. Krabs Josh Allen dual patch to 75 bills are thou feeling it now, mr. Krabs Cooper Cup on the Jersey Cards and 99 Rams and a Cowboys rookie auto here Sam Williams Commanders again, Brian Robinson jr. This time to 299 rookie Jersey auto book Laptops He know literally he know Falcons to color patch to 75 Desmond Ritter Damian Pierce Jersey Cards to 99 in Texans Broncos rookie auto Greg Dulcich and Dallas Clark to 75 Colts on the patch auto book nice hit Colts Dallas Clark Don't see a lot of his autos playbook is one of those is one of those products where you see a lot of Names you don't typically see yeah the product. It's just kind of cool A Jeff Garcia and a Dallas Clark and a Doug Baldwin in the same break. It's very weird Relics to 99 got Damian Pierce the Desmond Ritter I'm not going to call the number in everything one of them Desmond Ritter Cooper Cup Josh Allen Josh Allen Jonathan Taylor, Stefan Diggs, Desmond Ritter, Danny Gray Kyle Hamilton DK Metcalf a Triple Rams there Josh Allen again Drake London Terry McLauren autos Greg Dulcich Sam Williams Jerry Judy Doug Baldwin George Pickens Lane Johnson Robert Woods Jeff Garcia Marion Barber all the books. I think they're all auto books and others that all of all but one so auto books You have Dallas Clark a Brian Robinson jr. Vince young Skymore Just Jersey book here a patch book Kenneth Walker the third Seattle the 25 Sam house and your locker Eric is a conma and Malik Willis pretty good break. Thanks again everybody on to the next half case


As we approach World Water Day 2024, it is imperative to reflect on the central role that water plays in shaping global peace, security, and prosperity. This year's theme, Water for Peace, underscores the profound impact of water management on social political dynamics worldwide. Water can create peace or spark conflicts. Agriculture, which accounts for 72% of global freshwater withdrawals, is one of the keys to fostering lasting peace and security. Indeed, agriculture is a cornerstone for peace and stability, ensuring food security and sustaining livelihood, particularly among the most vulnerable populations. Yet the very foundation of food security is a constant threat from conflicts and disruptions. As we strive to feed a projected global population of 10 billion by 2050, agriculture production will need to increase by nearly 50% compared to 2012. Achieving this goal depends largely on innovations in water management, including irrigation and water harvesting, and the use of sustainable agriculture practice. With more than 3 billion people leaving water-stressed areas, optimizing water use efficiency in agriculture is paramount. Responsible governance of water tenure is also essential to ensure equitable access to water for all, leaving no one behind. As a student of global agriculture sustainability, we must double our effort to harness the potential of water as a catalyst for peace, stability, and prosperity. Let us continue our relentless pursuit of innovation, cooperation, and responsible stewardship to ensure a future where water is a source of unity rather than conflicts.


Donald Trump complained of unfair treatment in a defiant and rambling performance on the witness stand on Monday, prompting the judge overseeing his New York civil business fraud trial to threaten to cut his testimony short. While Trump walked out of the courtroom before coming back in, he made a gesture as if he was zipping his lip. Under questioning about his company's accounting practices, Trump repeatedly clashed with Judge Arthur Angaron, who was weighing weather to impose hundreds of millions of dollars in fines and other penalties that could hobble the real estate empire that vaulted Trump to prominence. Angaron warned former U.S. President Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination in the 2024 election, that he might remove him from the witness stand if he did not answer questions directly.


This research has developed a new type of EMI shielding material based on three-dimensional graphene oxide, GO, with regular honeycomb structure, GH, amino-functionalized faini alloy particles, ffaini, and epoxy resin. The resulting RGH ffaini slash epoxy composites show excellent EMI shielding performance, thermal stability, and mechanical properties. This study provides a promising approach for developing efficient EMI shielding materials. This article was authored by Ping Song, Zhong Lei Ma, Hua Chiu, and others.


Hi Jacob, this is Ashley with Augsmore Toyota. I wanted to send you over a quick video greeting that way you can see who you'll be working with. Thank you so much for your recent interest in a new forerunner. I went ahead and included our current inventory of forerunners for you to look over at your convenience. When you get a moment, please give me a call. My number is<PHONE_NUMBER> or you can also just email me back. Thanks, bye.


Questions, and we have a roving mic. Yes, we have runners on each side. OK. So Peter Martin, please. A library. It's working. A Library of Congress question, David, or observation. The Library of Congress won a few places where I thought that I could find a full set of official law reports of the states that still produced them. An inspection a couple of years ago indicated that there was a strong correlation between those it had in its collection and those it copyrighted it. That in fact, the Library of Congress was not expending public funds to acquire reports, but was simply relying on the law publications of the states which in fact were copyright registrations or deposits for their registration. I wonder if that's still the case. I'm not sure of the particulars for the reports itself, but it is true that the law library does rely a lot on the copyright deposits for adding to its collection. And that's simply because of funding. But I don't know, is there a specific state that you were interested in? I expected to find a complete collection and it was not there. And then I said, well, what's here and what's not here? And what was here were the states? Were the states that were copywriting, registering, and depositing? Right. And to the extent that we have availability of copyright deposits, we try to go that route. And to the extent that copyright no longer is asserted in law materials by states or other public bodies, then your collection will be impoverished. Or we may need to. Or you may need to seek other ways to address it. Exactly. Hi, Paul Verkyle from the Administrative Conference. Professor Tribe, it made me think of something. And we've talked already, but the connection between openness and access, which is your point of view, it struck me that Carl's example of the juice purveyor, the person who wants to enter the market and can't get all these rules together, is a perfect opportunity to inject another federal agency who's not at the table. And that is the Small Business Administration. And I'm just wondering whether we shouldn't make this effort to include, I mean, these are barriers to entry. These are small businesses that can't start up. There must be thousands of examples, not just the juice example, that we could collect. And we could intrigue an agency whose mission is to reduce these barriers. And access to judicial or non-judicial sources, your middle class focus, really, is access for people to have new jobs in a time when there was a hard to find. I think, Paul, you make a very good point. That is, we have in mind access not only to sort of static resources or to outcomes in cases where someone is being prosecuted or persecuted, being pursued in one way or another civilly or criminally, but access to entrepreneurial opportunity, access to things that have an affirmative thrust. And there's no reason at all why the Small Business Administration wouldn't be part of that, and subject only to the resource limitation of having a small office and trying to figure out whose portfolio covers which kinds of outreach. We are, in fact, reaching out to HUD, to the Veterans Administration, certainly to commerce. We plan to reach out to the SBA at some point. Hi. I'm Daniel Schumann with the Sunlight Foundation. The question I have has to do a little bit with the recursive nature of the information itself. Thomas makes available a tremendous amount of information to the public about all sorts of legislative materials. What is less visible, of course, is how well it is providing those services itself. For example, if a bill was introduced, does it take one day for it to become publicly available, or does it take five? The same sort of question can arise in the court context. What are the cases that people are looking at the most? What are the orders that folks are looking at the most? And this, of course, works with the executive branch as well when you're talking about access to OLC materials and things along those lines. So the question that I have for the panel is, to what extent, within the context of what we're talking about with law.gov, is the information about the information something that the public should have access to as well? Let me just make one comment about the meta information issue. There are two dimensions at least. I mean, one is to what extent people should have access to the information about the information. And I would say, in principle, that should be unlimited. But the other dimension is, how good are we at figuring out what information about the information to gather? And one of the emphases of my initiative is to work with the Office of Justice Programs on increasingly enriching the evidence, sort of the evidentiary base for various practices, figuring out what works, what doesn't work. To that extent, it's important that the pilot projects we encourage and follow are ones where the data is carefully gathered, but then one has to figure out what data. It's not just enough to know how many hits there are on a given site, but one wants to know something about what uses people are making of them, which searches are productive, which are not. And we're working, to some extent, with the National Institute of Justice and with others, probably also with some outside groups like the American Bar Foundation, on designing studies to figure out what uses are being made of the information and what kinds of access are particularly productive. I can add a comment to that. I think I have two comments going in slightly different directions, which I think can nevertheless be reconciled. First, getting the information about the information is critically important because it helps you to do not only to find individual materials, but to do much more meaningful, large scale analysis and that sort of thing. And so if, for example, you want to understand the general disposition of a particular judge towards the civil rights cases over time, it's important to have the metadata to understand that. On the other hand, and I'm sure I'm stealing a little bit of Harlan's thunder and he'll talk more about this in his panel, it's important not to let your pursuit of good metadata get in the way of getting the information. So if you can get the information before you can get the information about the information, that can often be useful. And in fact, if third parties are good at extracting the metadata from that core information, you may end up where you want to be, which is good information and good metadata. More quickly, if you, as an initial matter, make the core materials available and then work on the back end processes for the metadata. So it's important, but it shouldn't be a blocker. Let me just add to that very quickly. I just came back from meetings with mathematicians at Imperial College in London who have developed a new mathematical technique that will come out shortly in the proceedings of the National Academies that I have read and I'm completely unable to understand. But I think what it says is something to the effect of what they're able to do is to extract that metadata. In other words, to see the patterns, to find the communities, to find the groupings in data sets without having to know those correlations in advance, without having to have the metadata effectively. And it represents, as I have been told, an important mathematical advance in the analysis in graph theory of large-scale data sets, which has a tremendous application for things like, and has been tested on citation networks in particular, which has potentially very important applications for analysis of legal information and extracting that metadata. So we'll be interested in trying to find people who can read the math better than I can to confirm it, but I'm confident that the National Academies knew what they were doing when they decided to publish this most recent paper. So maybe we'll be seeing some interesting advances in this area of knowing what we know before we know it. I think we had one more question comment down there. Yes. So the Alex Howard O'Reilly media. So the Supreme Court recently redesigned its website. And they're now posting decisions more or less in the same day when they come out often within the hour as PDFs. Often, though, different government entities take their nods from what's happened at the top of the federal government, so in terms of what's happened with different.gov sites. What expectation, this might be a question for you, CTO Novak, since you handled the technical innovation aside. What can we expect in terms of hyperlinking those decisions? Right now they're in PDFs. Do you think there's an expectation that it will be available in XML? And we'll have a lot of the code built into it that was described earlier. I think you're our official representative of the judicial branch here. I have no personal knowledge of the technical implementation in that regard. What I will say, piggybacking on my last response, I suppose, is, for example, what we're doing with district court documents is we're able to pull out of the, I wouldn't call it a proprietary PACER system, but the sometimes difficult to parse PACER system, metadata in such a way that we can then represent that in a variety of ways. And so it may not require, as an initial matter, I think we'll see good reasons why it is a good idea as an initial matter if it's possible to make it available in those formats. But it may not require that as an initial matter to get that working. That's not a great direct answer. I did want to comment on your initial note, which was that folks often take direction from what's happening at the top. And that's why I think, for example, that although PACER and what's in the district bankruptcy and circuit courts at that level is a fraction of the legal materials we're talking about. And it's not only that, it's the type of legal material that your average citizen does not deal with federal litigation very often. It's nevertheless, first of all, very important precedentially, but it's also very important as an example of what can be done. And I think that if the federal government were to take some strong, clear steps, if the judiciary were to take some strong, clear steps, it would serve as an example further down the line. So I think a win when it comes to PACER goes far beyond PACER in that regard. Let me say, Alex, that I think in part what you're going to hear more about this afternoon about the federal register, I think to the point about modeling out what's possible with regard to things like hyperlinking, I think will have a very important demonstration value. Let me just ask Mike Walsh if I can put him on the spot. Is there anything you know in response to this question specifically through your work with the judicial branch, since the GPO does some of the back end work for the judiciary? We've done the hosting of the Supreme Court website up until they launched their own site. We're still in negotiations with the Supreme Court about what content they want to provide to us. We have been getting their feeds of data, and we don't know what their intent is, longer term. It may be that they want to provide us with the bound opinions to go into our collection system, but that hasn't been determined yet. Do you have any sense that since you are also working with NARA on the federal register that there will be some opportunity to again show, look what's possible, and we could do this over here, is there some positive externalities to the work that you're doing with the executive branch? Not yet, but from the Supreme Court side, but I think that there's great opportunity, the earlier comments about references and linkages and hyperlinks, when you start to tie things in Supreme Court opinions to even the Constitution annotated and having those linked together and the work within the rules and regulations, there's just a wonderful opportunity if we can really get the linkages coordinated and do that up front. So I'm very hopeful we can do that. It's a matter of getting the opportunity to do that. I had a question for, I guess, Professor Tribe, and it's not really a question about access to justice. It's accessed by justice. Justice Department spends $4 million a year accessing the PACER system, and it's my understanding that there's been occasions where Department of Justice lawyers might get memos saying we're over budget, stop doing so much research. My question is, we know that access by the poor to justice is an issue. Is access by lawyers for the poor to legal materials an issue? Lawyers that work for legal services corporation or for nonprofits or public interest firms? I think the short answer is yes, but the longer answer is it's not something I've looked at in any detail. We're having, for the first time, discussions with LSC. Apparently for 35 years, there was a kind of separation of church and state between the legal services corporation and the Department of Justice. We have to still be careful about how we interact with them, but we're learning a good bit more about what LSC offices are finding obstructions to their attempt to be of service to their clients, and my sense is that access to legal materials is part of the problem, but not in their perception, a central part. I am curious about the point made about the Supreme Court. I mean, is John Roberts as Chief Justice and Head of the Federal Judiciary centrally involved in this, or is it something that's left to others? Because I was struck in one recent oral argument by his observation, and sure many of you have seen it, in which he sort of, he asked whether, when someone is getting a text message, you get a busy signal when someone else is trying to text you. And I was thinking that perhaps if the decisions about these issues were being made by someone sort of with a contemporary sensibility about these matters, it might make a difference. Yeah, and I don't know, simple answer. I'm not sure what's driving the decision process there. We work primarily with the IT organization within the courts, so. I see. One of the aims of Law.gov is to establish enough of an open record that we can in fact approach the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office of the courts and discuss these technical issues. And to date, at least my experience has been that there's been very little outside input, certainly at the Judicial Conference level, and definitely at the Administrative Office of the US courts level. They're not working with the outside world. They're not working with the Princeton team, for example. They're not like the Office of the Federal Register working with the folks up at Cornell on ways to make their system better. At least that's my impression. We, I think, are just about out of time. So I think we're gonna have to cut this off. I'd love to keep this panel here all day, but I think we should break for lunch and we will start again at one o'clock precisely with the next panel. So thank you very much. Thank you. Lunch is outside. Go ahead and help yourself. Go ahead and bring it on in.


Hey everyone it's your go rena jinx welcome back to my channel it has been a really long time and I am just so sorry for how long it's been it's been a while since I have filmed it's been a while since I posted anything at all in terms of my blog. I have been obviously on Instagram snapchat and on my Facebook page my official rena jinx Facebook page but other than that I haven't really been doing anything as far as content on my blog and on YouTube it really sucked but I had a lot going on so yeah this is just a little update on where I been and what I've been doing and I'm going to give a little hair update as well so basically I got a new job at first I was traveling an hour both ways back and forth to my job but I recently moved two months ago almost two months ago so I got a new job and basically at the same time I moved out I had roommates but now I'm just now it's just me and my boyfriend in our apartment so it's pretty nice and I really like it it's really cute we're putting it together little by little is taking a while but that's okay because I don't like to buy things I don't like so we're taking the time to buy things we like and basically make it our own having a new job I had to kind of take a break so that I can take the time out to learn my new job and get acquainted with it and get used to working the 40 hour week I was at my last job I was working around 35 hours a week so that five hours actually makes a difference I was working I would say I was working more like 32 to 35 depending on scheduling so I obviously wanted to work 40 hours a week like a grown-up person and so I had to get adjusted to working a schedule like that because in the beginning I was tired constantly so now I'm a little bit more acquainted and I'm kind of used to it now but besides all that I do really really really really really want to get back on the horse and get consistent again with my content on YouTube especially YouTube comes first a little bit more before my blog just because even though I do like blogging I do have more fun filming and editing my videos but my blog is based around my YouTube page it's not the other way around so yeah so I'm really going to try and get back on here and film and edit it's going to be another adjustment with my 40 hour schedule so I do want to stick with my one video a week schedule which is what I was doing before my three month hiatus I don't want to commit to that just yet maybe I'll do a video every two weeks in the YouTube world though that just seems like forever so I really hate thinking that I have to do one video every two weeks I'm really going to try and shoot for a video a week and I'm pretty sure I can do it it's just going to be more challenging with my 40 hour a week schedule if you would like a more formal hair update I can do that for you guys with my hair actually out so you can see it and see what it looks like but I'll talk a little bit about my hair right now it's okay it's doing okay I haven't been a big fan of my hair lately only because once again I have heat damage which is really really annoying my hair is really sensitive so I think that I'm going to try to limit my heat usage probably to like a few times a year really going to try and not use heat if at all on my natural hair even while using heat protectants and I double up on layers of or triple sometimes my layers of heat protectant and depending on the temperature that I'm using or if I've used a bow dryer beforehand and use a heat another heat tool after my hair will become heat damaged and just just to avoid future damage I'm going to literally not try to use heat on my natural hair at all probably only when I do go and get my hair trims things like that I'll probably still use heat to blow it out first so that then I can have my hair trims I love using heat I love styling with heat but if it's going to continue to damage my hair and not revive like if I can't revive my natural curl curl pattern it's almost not worth it because when I look at old pictures and I can insert some pictures if you're interested if you're interested I'm just going to insert old pictures so you see what I'm talking about yeah if I when I looked back and this is recently I looked back on old pictures of my hair when I first went natural like the first year I went natural and it was so beautiful and I'm just like I kind of forgot what my hair looks like again like my hair is not relaxed but I forgot the curl pattern that I had I didn't take care of my hair like I did the first year that I was natural I kind of fell off the wagon going to definitely limit my usage a whole lot now just so I can get my hair back to the states that it was I've definitely been co-washing more which has been helping me so much and it's helped my hair retain a lot more moisture at the same time and my scalp is definitely back to normal it's it feels so much better and I don't know I guess I might have over washed my hair I don't know but my scalp was super duper dry and now it just feels so much better I can also do an updated product video because I use a lot of different I mean maybe not a whole lot of different products but I use quite a few different products probably since my last products videos so I can film that if you guys are interested as well but yeah I think that's it as for an update on my life and about my hair yeah I just wanted to come on here and talk to you guys because it's been a while been a minute but I'm back in a better let me stop being corny oh thanks for watching and whoever has stayed on my channel all this time I'm sweating here my ring light is hot yeah whoever has stayed on this channel all this time I really appreciate you guys whoever has subscribed to me in the past few months during my hiatus you guys are the bomb because even though I haven't been consistent you guys seem to like my channel and I really appreciate that yeah I really appreciate all the love I really hope to see you guys again soon


Let's write a program that creates the multiplication table for the digits 1 through 9. There are 9 rows, a good candidate for a loop. And each row has 9 columns, also a good candidate for a loop. Each entering the table is the product of the row number and the column number. To get this result, we'll need nested loops, 4 loops inside of 4 loops. It's really important to plan your output before you start writing your code. Let's look at what the header lines are going to look like. I'm going to have 2 dashes and a plus sign. And then in the rows beneath it, I'll have the number, a space, and a vertical bar. And let's just do the first 4 rows to get an idea of the process. Here in the main table, let's give 4 spaces per number and then in the second row we'll have 2, 4, 6, 3, 6, 9. And in the fourth row, 4 times 1 is 4, 4 times 2 is 8. And we want things so that the right hand side of the numbers lines up. But notice there's still 4 spaces for each of the numbers. That means that our header row will have to have 4 dashes for each number. And the heading line above it will also have to have the same spacing. And we'll need 3 spaces at the beginning to line everything up properly. I've put it here in the comments where each dot represents a blank space. Let's start with the 2 header lines. While I could do something like this, system.out.println, and then count the spaces myself by hand, that's a lot of work and is very error prone. Instead, let's use 4 loops to have Java do the counting for us. The first line of the header starts with 3 spaces and then the numbers 1 to 9. We'll use a loop that starts at 1, less than 10, adding 1 each time, and then use formatted printing with 4 spaces for an integer, whatever that number is. And that's the end of the first line of the header. For the second line of the header, we'll print dash dash plus and then have another loop that counts from 1 to 9. And this time, we'll print 4 dashes. And that's the end of the second header line. Let's save that program, compile it, and run it just to see that this part works. I like to test my programs one stage at a time rather than writing the entire program and then testing it. And so far, it's looking good. Now let's get to the body of the table. We see that there are 3 characters up to and including the vertical bar. And then each of the number takes up 4 spaces. Let's put a comment, and in fact, we may as well put a comment here, and we'll write the outer 4 loop that prints the row numbers. We'll start row at 1, and as long as row is less than 10, we'll do the body of the loop and then add 1 to row. We'll print the row plus a blank and a vertical bar, and later on we'll print the column entries for the row, and then go to the next line. Let's test that, and that also is looking good. To print the column entries for the row, we need a 4 loop nested inside the outer loop. We're going to use the name column for our loop control variable. It also starts at 1, and the loop continues as long as it's less than 10, adding 1 each time through our inner loop where we will use system.out.printf to give a formatted print 4 spaces as an integer, the row times the column, which is the entry for that particular row and column. Let's move this up a little bit to give ourselves more space. Share it out, compile again, and run, and there's our multiplication table. Again, here's the nested loop part of the code, with colors and lines to help you see their relationship. In regard to programming style, using meaningful variable names for your loop control variables and indenting correctly are vital for keeping your code organized and readable when you have loops inside of loops.


What is going on guys? Today I am back with another Destiny video and today I bring you Xer's loot and location for the 18th of August 2017. But before we get into the video guys I am giving away a Rockstar Exclusive Destiny 2 in-game gear code within this video. If to be in with a chance of winning it simply drop a like and leave a comment down below. Okay so this week Xer is located within the Reef so you want to spawn here and head to that dark dark room where he stands in that dark dark corner. Okay so I wonder why he will have this week please be something good. I'm okay. What? What? Are you guys seeing this? Am I dreaming? Try that again. What? What is going on here? I think I'm being trolled. I think I am seriously being trolled. And this is why no one cares about the videos. Well until now when he brings gally gally gally gally gally gally horns. No let's see I'm done. I've had enough not being trolled like that by Bungie. See you guys later.


One of the most important packages of software that's installed on any GNU slash Linux distribution is the GNU Core Utils or the Core Utilities.  All of that is packaged up as a suite of software called the GNU Core Utils. We also have a very important package called the GNU Find Utils. That includes the GNU Find command, Locate command, XRGs. And I've done videos about many of these Core Utils and Find Util programs before, but today I wanted to talk about two very important Core Utility programs that not a lot of people know about and that's Split and C-Split. So let me switch to my desktop and I'm going to go ahead and launch a terminal and let's zoom in here. And of course we're going to talk about Split and C-Split. Very similar programs, just slightly different Split. You can see it splits a file into pieces and if I quit out of that and I man a C-Split, C-Split splits a file into sections or pieces determined by context line. So basically it accepts regular expressions, rig X. And I mentioned these are lesser known Core Utils because not a lot of people have a need to actually split files up into pieces. But I have run into this problem, the reason I know about these commands is I knew about these commands before I was a full-time Linux desktop user. Many years ago when I was still running Windows on the desktop like 15, 20 years ago, I was actually using Linux web servers because I was one of those kids that loved building websites back in the early days, the mid 90s, late 90s. And sometimes transferring large files, especially large database files to a remote web host you couldn't do it because they had a limit on the size of the files that they could handle for a transfer. So what you would have to do is you would have to split those up into manageable chunks. So if you had, I don't know, a 100 megabyte file, but the web host, the web server could only handle 10 megabyte files for a transfer, well you take that 100 megabyte file and you split it up into 10 separate 10 megabyte files. That way you could actually do the transfer. So let me show you Split and C-Split in action.  So I'll make a new directory called Test. Make Deer of course is part of the GNU Core Utils. Then I'm going to CD into the new test directory. If I LS it is empty. What I want to do is I want to copy some stuff to work with, some files that we can work on. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to copy my config for fish, the fish shell over to this directory. And then what I want to do is I will also copy over my bash RC and we may split that up into some sections as well. And for a XML file I know I have some OpenBox configs on the system. So let's do OpenBoxMenu.xml, copy all of that over just so we have some test files that we can play with. So the most basic way to use Split is to use Split, space dash L for a line count and then give it a line count. For example I could do 100 lines and then the location of a file, in this case dot bash RC is the name of the file here in this test directory. And if I do that and hit enter and now I do an LS, I have my bash RC still here but now I have these three new files, XAA, XAB, XAC. If I open XAA here inside VIM and I go to the last line, the last line is line number 100 because that is what it's split on, on line 100, right? Because that's what we told it to. If I VIM XAB and I go to the last line, that is also line number 100 and then of course if I VIM XAC, if I can spell it correctly, and I go to the last line, its last line is only line 55 because it didn't have 100 lines, right? That was the very last file that could split. So that is the L flag for a line count. Now you don't actually have to give the L flag for a line count if you're going to do line breaks after 1,000 lines because that's the default. If you don't give it a line count, it's going to break after 1,000 lines. I don't have 1,000 lines in my bash RC. So actually let me show you what would happen if I ran this. So let me actually remove the X files here. Now let me split dot bash RC. And then because the default line break is after 1,000 lines, just watch what happens when I do it LS. I have my bash RC and then I have one outputted file XAA. You see both of them are the exact same size, 8.6 kilobytes in size because basically XAA is an exact copy of the bash RC because there weren't even 1,000 lines to split it up. So let me go ahead and do a RM. I'm going to do a dash RLF just to force this so it doesn't ask me the interactive yes or no question that it asked me when I removed the files before. Now one thing I want to show you before I move on, let me go back to the split dash L100 bash RC where we split the files into 100 line chunks. And I opened the files in Vim to verify that that was the case. You could actually verify this very easily using the WSC program, the word count program, which is another GNU core util. If I did WSC dash L for a line count and I did XAA, it'll actually tell me that XAA has 100 lines in it. XAB has 100 lines in it. If I did XAC, it only has 55 lines in it. And if I wanted to get a list of all of that, I could have just did word count dash L, space X, and then asterisk. And it would have gave me each file and their line counts plus the total of all three. So let me go ahead and remove all of those split files. And then now I want to show you a new flag. Instead of splitting it based on the number of lines, you can actually just tell it how many even splits you want on a file. So if I do split dash in space five and then dot bash RC, what I'm telling split to do is I want you to split the bash RC into equal file sizes of five files. And if I do it LS, you see now I have XAA, XAB, XAC, XAD, XAE. And the one thing to know about the names for these in split and in C split, the very first part of the file name X, think of that as the prefix of the file name. And then everything after that, such as AA, AB, AC, all of that is considered the suffix in the file name. And the reason I mentioned that is because we can actually change the prefix and the suffix of these split file names. So that is splitting based on the number of files. But by the way, I just deleted those files. But you can see from the last LS it created five even sections of files. So it split it into 1.7 kilobyte files. And it was able to do that evenly amongst five files. If we'd actually read those, how it achieves an exact split on those files is because it no longer cares about line breaks or breaking in the middle of a line. So it's a little clunky to do that, especially if you want to go ahead and put these files back together into one file later. So you can split based on line count. You can split based on the number of files. You can also split based on a byte size. So if I do split and space dash B for byte size, I can say split after 512 bytes. Or I could actually do something like 100 megabytes or 100 kilobytes. But my bash RC doesn't have that many lines in it. So let's just do 512 bytes on the bash RC. And if I do an LS, you can see we created a number of files here, about 20 files or so. If I open the first one in Vim, and you can see it no longer cares about line breaks because there was more to this line. But you know, once it reached 512 bytes, that's where it split the file. And it starts the next one. And if I quit out of this and I Vim XAB, you can see it starts. The very first line is the end of the line from the previous file. So again, it's kind of clunky when you split based on exact file size or byte size. Now I mentioned earlier that the X part of the name is the prefix and then the AAABAC is the suffix part of the name. Now what happens if you're splitting a really large file into a bajillion pieces? These are not enough characters in the name to actually accommodate for that. So what you would do is you would tell split, you know, exactly how many letters in the suffix do you want. So if I did split dash A5, for example, that tells split to put five letters as part of the suffix rather than the standard two letters that it would typically do. So if I do this on the bash RC, hit LS, and the new split was this right here. You see XAAAAA, right? Five A's and it only split at the one time because I didn't specify a line count or anything. And remember by default, the line count is a thousand lines. So that's why we only get the one file there. Let me go ahead and do a RMRF on all those split file names that begin with X and let me clear the screen. Now one other thing we could do, let me do a split, a line count 100. And this time I'm going to do dash D. What dash D does is it tells split instead of using the alphabetic characters for the suffix, please use numerals instead digits. So let's do the bash RC again. If I do it LS, you see now instead of XAAA, I have X00, X01, X02. And I believe once again, if I wanted to, I could, you know, just do a dash A5 for example. And I split that up and you see now I get X00, X00, X00, X01, etc, etc. So that is how those flags work. The dash A flag adds more characters to the suffix. And if you add the dash D flag, that changes from using alphabetic characters for the suffix to digits to numeric characters. Let me clear the screen. Now let's talk about the C split command. So if I man C split, C split splits a file into sections determined by context lines. And so what this is, it's pattern matching essentially. Now C split does a lot of the basic stuff that split does. For example, I could split my config dot fish at lines five, lines 25, line 100. If I do that, I get some output here. This is telling me that it created four new files and it's giving me the byte size for each of the four files. If I do a LS, you see we have four split files now, XX00, XX01, XX02, XX03. So the prefix is different in C split. So split, the prefix was a single X. In C split, it defaults to a prefix of two Xs. Also the suffix is changed, where split defaulted to alphabetic suffixes. C split defaults to a numeric suffix. Now let me clear the screen. If I can type clear correctly. Now one cool thing you can do with C split is I could run C split on my config dot fish and I could tell it to split after five lines. And then I could do the curly braces and inside the curly braces, I could do a asterisk meaning repeat the split every five lines. It's basically telling it how many a number of times to do the split after five lines. If I did curly braces and then a zero inside the curly braces, that would say split after five lines one time. Asterisk means just keep going until you can't do it anymore. Now I think this command will probably fail because this command only works if the file you're splitting is actually divisible by five lines. And in my case, it looks like it might have not, it didn't, it gave us some output but eventually it reached the very last split and the very last split was not five lines. It was probably less than five lines and of course that caused it to error out. If I do a up arrow to run that last command and I give it this flag here dash K five and then the curly braces asterisk, this is telling C split. If the last file is not divisible by five run the command anyway. So now it should allow us to run that. Yeah, if I do it LS, you see I have 68 files now that were split into five line chunks. If I did a VM and XX00, you can see there's the first five lines of my config dot fish. Let me run out RMRF to clean all of that up. I'm gonna clear the screen. And one other cool thing you could do is I wanted to split my bash RC on lines five and lines 26 and then I could give it the dash F flag and dash F lag allows you to set a prefix. And maybe I want the prefix instead of being XX to be, I don't know, ZZ. And if I hit enter and I do it LS, you see our outputted files here. ZZ00, ZZ01, ZZ02. So now let me do a RMRFZZ and get rid of those files there. And if I wanted to change these suffix for the files I could also, instead of doing just dash FZZ for the prefix, I could also add dash B for suffix and I could add %02D. And that's saying the suffix needs to be two integer digits and .sh. So I want you to add .sh as an extension to the file name as well. And you see we get the bite size output. If I do it LS, you see now the split file names are ZZ00.sh, ZZ01.sh. And of course I specified two digits. Now that's the default. If I wanted to remove these and rerun that command and specify three digits .sh and then do it LS, you see ZZ00.sh, et cetera. So let me remove those files and clear the screen once again. Now, of course I mentioned the big advantage of C split over split is the fact that it can do pattern matching. You can do reg X expressions in it. So the basic form of that would be a C split and then the name of the file. And then inside single quotes, some kind of pattern matching. So if I wanted to do a pattern match, well, let me show you this in action. Let's C split my config.fish. And then I know I have several functions defined in my fish config. So I want you to split on every line that contains function space. So that is actually where I start defining a function in my fish config. And let's go ahead and add the curly braces, the asterisks. So split every time you find function space in a line. And it looks like it found about 15 of those or so. If I do it LS, it looks like it found 14 of them. And if I open the very first file in Vium, you can see if I scroll down, there's no words or lines to begin with function because if I look at the second file, function. There's a function defined here and that's where it split on that line. And if I look at the third file, you can see it should start with function. So every time I start defining a function, that is where it split my config.fish there. Let's go ahead and remove all the XX files. And of course, you can get creative with the red jacks. I'm sure I've got plenty of blank lines in my config.fish. So if I wanted the pattern to be the carrot symbol, which is the start of the line, the dollar symbol, which is the end of the line. Well, the start of the line and the end of the line with nothing in between them, that's an empty line. So I want you to split on every single empty line.  So it split my config.fish into 51 files. Remember it starts at XX00. So let me go ahead and run the RMRF command to get rid of all of that. One last thing I wanna mention with the red jacks and the pattern matching with C split, you can offset it. So for example, if I want you to find every empty line here and split on that, well, I could offset it by whatever number I wanna offset it, so I want to do a plus one. So a plus one line offset, meaning don't break on that empty line you find, break on the line after that. If I run that, we're gonna get 49 split file names this time. But if I vim XX01, the second one, instead of breaking on an empty line, you see there's no empty line there. The empty line is actually gonna be the last line of the very first file that split because it did a one line offset on the splits. Let me quit out of that. And the final thing I wanna just briefly mention is sometimes when you're doing complicated regex expressions and pattern matching and it splits your files, sometimes you will get empty files in the output. So some of the split files that result will actually be zero byte files. And of course, you're not gonna want that. So you may want to go ahead and add this flag here dash dash Eli dash empty dash files to any kind of complicated C split regex command you run just to make sure that you don't have any zero byte files as a result of that command. So that's just some of the basics with the split command and the C split command. Actually, that's a pretty good bit of what you can do with split and C split. They're not very complicated commands. There's not a ton of flags to them. Now I've done several videos in the past highlighting some of these great GNU Core Utils. If you like these videos and you wanna see me highlight some more of these great command line utilities, let me know in the comments down below. Now before I go, I need to thank the producers of this episode. I'm talking about Devin Gabe, James Matt, Michael Mitchell, Paul Scott, Wes Acami Allen, Lenox Ninja, Chuck Commander, Ingrid Kurt, Diokai, David Dillon, Gregory Heiko, Casca, Lee Maxim, Mike Nitrix, Erion, Alexander Peace, Archon Fedora, Polytech Raver, Red Prophet, Steven and Willie. These guys, they're my high steered patrons over on Patreon without these guys. This episode you just watched would not have been possible. The show's brought to you by all of these fine ladies and gentlemen as well. All these names you're seeing on the screen right now. These are all my supporters over on Patreon because I don't have any corporate sponsors. I'm sponsored by you guys, the community. If you like my work and you wanna support me, please consider subscribing to DistroTube over on Patreon. All right guys, peace. My love for the GNU Core Utils is the reason I can't switch to BSD.


So I've had experience with this and I know a number of people who have had experience with this but they'll watch their squat from behind and they'll say oh my god that bar is so shifted it might look like this or maybe not quite that bad but maybe something like this and what they try to do then is they try to lift the tilted downside okay so if you have this barbell is twisting idea generally you can't feel it unless you are looking at it you can't we're very biased in ourselves and we are overconfident in our abilities and this is one example of that so a lot of times I'll give someone a cue and I'll say I want you to come over this way and I'll say okay a little bit more okay a little bit more and then they'll say oh my god you want me all the way over there and I'm like yeah but all I'm doing is just putting you back to center and they're like what that's unreal I've had no idea I was so off-kilter there so it's the same kind of idea and maybe more so even with the barbell squat where the bar is bending so what I want to talk about is why is the barbell bending the the spine is the biggest thing for us to look at so I don't know if you know animal anatomy very well but salamanders tend to crawl like this where they side bend on each step and our spines do the same thing what happens when we take steps is some form of that right and now I'm exaggerating it so you can see it but it's the same principle our our spines and our hips can work in that way so one hip will hike up that spine will bend that way and the shoulder on that side will drop and it looks kind of like a bar tilting while you're squatting so I would caution the person who's trying to fix this by lifting the downside I would say instead you should look at the hips because that's closer to the ground that's closer to where you're producing the actual forces right so everything comes from the lower body the interaction with the ground is what moves the bar so we should start there we should and in anecdotally when we do start there we generally see better things and outside of that if I'm tilting and I just lift at the lower side that's just shrugging on that side and that's just gonna shut off my hamstring my glutes my quads on that side so I don't want any of that now okay so look at the hips first if I am shifted this way and I see my squat like this generally you're gonna see a side-to-side transfer a little bit in in you know a concomitant with the barbell bending or tilting so look at the hips address the hips first if you notice the right hip is too high and maybe you know some anatomy you can think okay what is too short let's make it longer but generally you can just look at it and say okay that's too short let's do this instead so if I notice someone with a right hip that's too high I'm thinking okay they got too much abs here they got too many inner costals here that right shoulder has dropped down we need to open up that right side we need to drop the right hip and open the right lateral chest well side chest armpit area I need you to show me your armpit a little bit more when you flex right so that's that's sometimes a good cue depending on what exercise you're doing and most importantly if I think about doing this here's your general rule if I'm doing a hip shift and my right hip comes up higher my left hip comes down lower which glute is off which glute is longer is maybe a better question shorter glute is the left one so this tilting shuts off my right one so any exercise that helps you find that right glute that helps you keep that and potentially keep that in some sort of squatting pattern can be therapeutic so make sure you're finding and feeling a right glute I like to start people if they're really shifted some of the best exercises are single leg stuff so a split squat is the best one to start with hold a really lightweight in front of your body if you're if you're pretty strong otherwise just go body weight maybe even support yourself on a chair in front of you and you're just gonna come down okay and you're generally gonna want to do the same thing but when you're on one leg it's much easier to cue so we're gonna say okay let's hike the left hip up and we're gonna hang on to that this whole time and then you might watch some of my other videos you might see oh my god my foot it's rolling out let's keep that foot flat let's keep that down that's your basic rule keep the foot flat keep the hips level and then just try to run through that motion then you could do that for a couple of weeks or you could even do that right away and go squat again because the goal here is to improve the squat so we want to use that as our major measure if you're feeling a glute that's a good thing if you don't feel so tight over on that side that's higher that's also a good thing so hi I'm sure you're gathering by now a tilting bar is usually not a quick fix and it's pretty complicated so look at the hips find out what glute is off find out what inner thigh is off hint it's the opposite of the glute if my right hip is higher my left adductor is off and if my left hip is higher my right adductor is more off and lastly I would caution you I'm trying to simplify this for you in this hip-hike thing but that's not the whole story because there's also twisting that's going on when we side bend just like our salamander crawls we also turn our body so this turns my spine the side bending turns my spine this way okay it doesn't turn all my spine this way but it turns this part of my spine this way so you need to be aware of that you might not only have a tilt but you might also have a turn and you're gonna have to keep that in mind so if I have this right hip-hike make sure I'm looking for this glute here make sure I'm looking for this inner thigh here and make sure I can maintain some sort of lower outside abs because those are our general cue to say okay I have control of my hips I'm optimizing my hip mobility now I know that I'm squatting in a good position so turn on the glute look at the hips and use those lower outer oblique abdominals to help guide you good luck


Hey, here we go, here we go. What a great day to be mic'd up. What a great day. We said our plan today is to make sure they don't use none of this footage. I don't know why they might make me up. I'm not very good content. Aloha, my friend. Good job moving the pocket, Marcus. Good job moving, Park. You got a hoodie on?  Ah!  Where you done, my dude? Look at you. I was going to set you up, but I can't do that to you today. I know, I was going to set you up, but you know what, CP, I'm feeling nice today.  That's what he said, it is what he said. Shows up every day, man. I'm trying to get all you guys right there to be mic'd up.  I'm way too tired. What'd you say about code? Oh, okay. Hey, 43? Want to show you came down here? Oh, wait a minute. Oh, that one in the lungs. I'm a Scout T-Mall American, just see me out there. Lock it. Scout T-Mall American. Oh, no! You got them small bags? You got them small bags, aren't you, though? I don't like the way you say, yeah, bro. Four bags? See, I'm feeling the fire in his rookie. I'm feeling the fire here. No, no, no, this is the chance to say some crazy. Let me tell you the facts. Yeah, I'm the first right now. Mama, I love you. Mama, I love you. You see, that's the thing when you mic'd up. Don't act different. You got to act exactly like you normally act. If you cuss, cuss. Now, I want them to get that on there. You got a couple shorts? They're flubbing it. Let's get a couple. That's what they want to hear is me. Y'all punt 80 times on the sideline. I'm mic'd up. I forgot to say it.


In all my previous videos in the Introduction to Data Science series, Orange Widgets sends data instances to each other. For example, we loaded Human Development Index data with the Datasets widget and then looked at the data in the data table. Notice that Orange reports that the two widgets communicate using the data channel. We also used the scatter plot and the output from the Datasets widget is again labeled as data. But the information carried from one widget to another does not necessarily contain only the data instances. For example, Orange widgets can also output distance matrices, objects that learn from the data, evaluation results or a set of data features. Okay, I'm going too fast and we will learn about these types of channels in our later videos. But let me make an example here. I will use a correlations widget that shows, well, correlations, between two features in my dataset. The widget sorts the feature pairs by the absolute correlation. We can see that some features in Human Development Index data are strongly correlated. For instance, countries with high infant mortality rates also have high child mortality rates.  I would like to see this particular relation in the scatter plot. I could open a scatter plot and manually find this specific pair of features. But I would need to do this for every pair I find interesting in the correlations widget and I am too lazy to do this. Instead, let me connect correlations to the scatter plot. Orange asks me what type of connection I would prefer. I do not want correlations to emit the data with only the chosen set of two features. So I click on the link and cancel this signal. Instead, I see that correlations also outputs the information on the two features I can select in the widget. The scatter plot can receive this information on the features channel. Let me establish this communication channel by dragging a line from correlations features box to the scatter plots features box. Nice. I see that orange now adds the label features on the link between correlations and scatter plot. I will now open both widgets. Selecting a row in correlations now emits a signal that informs the scatter plot which axis to display. I see why education inequality is negatively correlated with mean years of schooling or why there is such a high correlation between male and female populations with at least some secondary education. In this video, I have introduced a widget that computes correlation between pairs of data features and use it to demonstrate another type of channel. In my next video, I would like to close my introduction to orange workflows and visual programming by showing you the widgets that report on the distribution of feature values.


And that's the point that a lot of men are making, like a lot of these contingency plans that we're seeing women may go into the sperm bag and shit like that, it doesn't make sense because on the face, you're tabbing this idea that we don't need men. But the reality is women absolutely need men for survival. I agree. Listen, it's the message right here. Black boy tell me how you really feel, cause I just wanna build with you. Girl tell me how you really feel, I wanna keep it real with you. I wanna live better, eat better, I wanna love better, sleep better, yeah. I wanna feel so aligned. What I'll say is this, kind of like I mentioned earlier, it's a, I think it really boils down to a value thing, like a value question. Because even you're mentioning like, you know, where does the critique end, right? Where, when are we good enough? I think what you're describing is just a, the tip of the iceberg of masculinity. Back in the day, the complain is that men were too macho, they didn't show enough emotion, they spent too much time at work, just this and that. Nowadays, the complaint is men spend too much time playing video games, men are too soft, they're not as hard working. So like men in a lot of ways have made peace, some peace with, will never be good enough for you. Even, even the popular narrative on TV and the media is, there's some way he's fallen short, but I'm just here. You know what I'm saying?   Like that is the prevailing narrative and guys have had to kind of make peace with the fact that, you know, I'm quote unquote not the prize. You know, I'm quote unquote never going to be good enough for her.  Now on the flip side, I can't even tell you to make a sandwich without being misogynistic. Oh my gosh. That's not true. I can't, no, no, no. I'm not saying me personally. I'm just saying these are, these are the things that, yeah, these are the things men are saying. I can't even tell you, I don't like that dress. I can't even, like I can't tell you shit, whether it's a romantic relationship, whether it's a platonic relationship, whether it's a family relationship, and men are starting to realize, especially nowadays when there's now an abundance of options, men are starting to realize that, hold on, wait, this ain't the best I can be doing. I don't have to use my time and effort critiquing somebody who doesn't want to listen.  And a lot of the passport bros, they're not going to white women. They're going to black women just somewhere else. Because the reality of it is, the cater to you song, Beyonce, and her saying she's going to brush her hand, put his do rag on, is like monumental. In other countries, that's standard. And then on the flip side, what you have to do in the West to keep a woman happy, doing that there is like making her dreams come true versus here, it's like, you know, you see the videos of, oh, you're not going to pay for me and my 18 friends. You feel what I'm saying? So we're not having an equitable conversation. And all black men are saying to our women is, you expect me to come into this with optimism, with grace, and with open mindedness and the benefit of the doubt, right? And I'm supposed to value and see value in you versus on the flip side, that's not reciprocated up for the, I would say even the majority of men, their experience and not just in romance, I'm talking about just, you know what I'm saying, hotel clerk, I'm talking about grocery store, I'm talking about just every day, their experience tends to kind of mirror some of our experiences with white people.   And we feel that energy. And even if it's in a relationship, even if it's, you know what I'm saying, you can even walk her down the aisle, it's, there's some way shape or form that I'm falling short. And this is the first, and I think this is why it's hurting women's feelings so much. This is the first time men have had the opportunity to even gain the language to articulate that. Like we've been feeling this for a long time and we'll chop it up with our boys, but a lot of us didn't even have the language. We didn't even know what was going on. We just thought it was normal. Oh, she's just gonna complain it is, what it is, it is. But then we're looking at it like, yo, I don't like this either.  And I'm not saying that with certainty. No, no, no, listen. I'm saying I could see possibly how it could be. No, no, no, that's absolutely true. No, no, let's not beat around the bush. No, it is absolutely true. It's easier to be with a white man. Absolutely. Now, are you thinking about that in historical context? Right. Are you thinking about that from his perspective? Right. Why is it that he has an affinity for an abrasive woman who's more domineering and more, you know what I'm saying? Like there's a reason why compared to black men, he might be an easier. And then the part, and we're talking about Eve, the part that's even the most infuriating for me, especially when I think about young boys is you spend so much time touting a certain archetype of black man, the soldier, the two-pock, the negorated pop off this, this and that. And then when boys follow your lead, because young boys are led by their penises, when they follow your lead and become that and ruin their lives, end up in a jail cell, end up in the ground. Oh, now, men age.  You know, carrot for young boys.  Serena Williams ain't marrying a black version of Ohania, whatever his name is.  So that is the part that is so infuriating.  I think what it should tell black women is that, yo, men are willing to go down in looks to go up in cooperation. And our women are spending so much time, energy and effort just trying to look the part.  But how sustainable is that long term if you are looking for long term companionship? Nobody's really thinking about that. Yeah. Are people really looking for long term companionship?  I think it sounds good on paper, but I've observed women in groups for a long period of time. It's not sustainable. You're saying they want two separate rooms? Is that what you mean? No, no, no, no, like I'm talking about the cattiness. Oh, okay. I'm talking like women now some women are saying we don't need men.   That's jealousy. Yeah, that's not, yeah. But I'm saying like female nature is there is some cattiness. Yeah, but that's very unnatural as well. I don't think so. I don't think having a roommate, a woman, especially when you have a roommate piece, that's very unnatural. But they're using it as an alternative to having to change themselves to be able to be in partnership with a man. I agree 100%. And I think we talked about this a little bit. That's where I think that we will be going. You will see a lot more of that and I don't think it's black, white, whatever.  They don't want to get married. They're literally older women that are telling young women, don't get married. It's not worth it. This and that. Don't have kids. Gold of your life, this and that. And the roommate thing, it's going to be, they're going to find a way to capitalize off of that. I think it's going to be a big moneymaker for this country. But it is very unnatural. I mean, especially if you're like in childbearing years between like 27 and 32 from like a, from a primal perspective, what are you going to share, share resources in this house together, especially if there's a man that, which even sounds crazy too.  That'll even make no sense. But, and that's the point that a lot of men are making. Like a lot of these contingency plans that we're seeing women may go into the sperm bag and shit like that. It doesn't make sense because on the face, you're telling this idea that we don't need men, but the reality is women absolutely need men for survival. I agree.  And now you feel like, you know what I'm saying? You can go pay for what happens during a hurricane, right?    So unless, unless you want to die on this hill that men have no value in anything you could do, I could do better. And you know what I'm saying? Girl power, this, this and that. Now, if that's the case, cool and do that.  I agree.


Hello people of the internet, my name is Johnny, welcome back to yet again another FNAF movie news video. I don't know what to tell you guys, we've just been getting so, so much brand new amazing info on the upcoming FNAF movie by Blumhouse, and in today's video we're gonna be looking at some brand new behind the scenes, a bit of info on when we can expect not only tickets to go on sale, but also the first reviews of the film to go live, as well as an actual Freddy Fazbear's attraction opening in real life very soon. So if you're excited for all this FNAF movie news, scroll down, subscribe to the channel. It is easily the best way to stay up to date with not only FNAF movie news, but everything else going on in the FNAF scene. Our first bit of news here involves the composers for the upcoming film you may remember not too long ago, Tyler Bates was the composer for the movie. Well it seems like that news has changed and instead the Newton brothers will be composing the score. You may recognize them, they've walked on the score for other films like Doctor Sleep, you know, only the sequel to The Shining. Netflix's The Haunting of Hill House series, as well as Marvel's upcoming X-Men 97 animated series. So they've gotten some major projects under their belt. I can't wait to see what they come up with for the FNAF movie. Next up we got an official giffy page going up for the movie, showing off some brand new looks at the characters. Got Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, Foxy, as well as Mr. Cupcake all glancing around. Then we also have their variants where they are inside of the ball pit looking around. It's a pretty interesting look at these characters. And speaking of interesting looks at the characters, take a look at this video. That's right, cinema theaters and hopefully other theaters around the world and here in the States will be putting up official standee displays of the movie. As you can see, this display is fricking massive. You got an entire backdrop of the entrance to Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Place exactly as it looks like in the film, but that's not all because they have four different cardboard cutouts of the characters, Foxy, Freddy, Bonnie and Chica.  This news was absolutely fantastic to find out. I love when films do this.  And this display looks absolutely amazing. It fits so so well with the FNAF movie. And like I said, hopefully a lot of theaters will be getting this display. Halloween Horror Nights at Universal Studios is still happening right now where you can see the actual animatronics they used in the film. And it seems like now they actually have someone presenting these animatronics and actually they revealed some pretty interesting news about them. Yes, they are real. These are the authentic screen use animatronics from Five Nights at Freddy's. It took 15 months to construct. They're made by Jen Hansen's Creature Shop. That's right. 15 whole months to construct these animatronics and honestly, the weight and the time and the effort, the heart and soul, everything put into these characters was absolutely worth it. They look amazing. I still can't get over how good they look. They look like they were ripped just straight out of the first game. Jen Hansen's Creature Shop. Major, major round of applause to you guys. All right, well now let's move on to a brand new behind the scenes photo. Take a look at this. You may recognize this shot. This is Abby and Golden Freddy standing outside of the facade of Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Place. It looks strikingly similar to this shot here that shows up towards the end of one of the trailers. You can see Abby's wearing the same kind of denim jacket and the red pants. The only difference is that the lights in this behind the scenes photo for the Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Place sign are not turned on. And the reason for that is most likely because this isn't exactly that same shot because we can see it on one of the cameras. The camera is not at all pointed towards the back of the characters. Instead, it's showing off their front view. Though very likely this is going to be a shot in the film itself where it's a front view of Abby and Golden Freddy standing outside of the pizzeria. And it really makes you think for what reason are these characters not only outside of the pizzeria but why are they going back inside? It's pretty much confirmed at this point that Abby and Golden Freddy have some form of connection. So what these characters are doing together? I'm extremely interested. What are your thoughts and theories? All right, now I know the first film isn't even out yet but we do in fact already have some of the cast and crew talking about the possibility of future films. I'm sure we're all away at this point but Matthew Lillard who plays Steve Raglan aka William Afton has gone on record to say he has in fact signed a three-picture deal with Universal. So if three films do get produced, Matthew will be in those three movies. Well, now we also have director Emma Tammy talking about the possibility of even more movies. She said in an interview with SFX Magazine, I think we would all feel so fortunate to be able to continue making movies in this universe and with these characters. It'll all depend on how things go with this first one but should we be lucky enough to make more, I would absolutely want to be involved and would feel lucky to be included in those sequels again should they happen. There you go, straight from the director's mouth. If this first movie does well, there is interest to do more movies. Honestly, that is one of the major reasons why people are so hesitant on the movie being released not only in theaters but also on Peacock at the same time because that is probably drastically going to cut back on the amount of money they get at the box office. But hopefully if FNAF fans unite, we can absolutely make this film pop off because I'm sure all of us fans would love more entries on the big screen. And like we just looked at, even Emma herself said if there are future installments, she would love to return as the director. And again, with Matthew signing that three-picture deal with Universal, it seems that everyone working on the film would love to continue making FNAF on the silver screen. It really just depends on that box office. Well, Johnny blocks, I hear you asking, dear viewer, who has surely hit the subscribe button by now, by the way. When, oh, when can I buy my tickets to support the FNAF movie at the box office? Well, luckily for you, you'll only have to wait literally one more day because we got regal cinemas officially announcing tickets will go on sale tomorrow if you're watching this video when it's uploaded October the 1st. There have been reports of select theaters already having the tickets available on sale, but October the 1st, if your theater doesn't have them on sale yet, that's when they're going to go live. All right, we know when the tickets are going to go live, but when can we see those critics' reviews? Because if you're not aware, the other day critics actually did see a press screening for the entire film. The embargo doesn't lift until next month in October, which means they can't share their thoughts, they can't share their reviews until that time is lifted. We don't know exactly when in October they can release their thoughts and feelings on the film. It could be exactly when tickets go live, if the reviews are well.  Of course, that is the best case scenario. I'm not entirely sure how critics, you know, non-fanathans are going to respond to this film. It's going to be certainly very interesting, but there is a group of people out there who have already seen this film and hopefully sometime pretty soon we can get their official reviews. Now we've talked about a lot of big news in today's video, but what we're about to talk about right now might just be the biggest. Because we got a TikTok user posting this video of a building on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles being decorated to be themed around the upcoming FNAF film. You can see right now the entrance is gated off because there are workers inside getting this all prepared for whatever it's gonna be. But on the outside, we can get a taste of what this building is going to be about. We got the silhouettes of Bonnie, Freddy, Foxy, and Chica. Various sayings like, book your next party, let the celebration begin, get ready for Freddy's and where fantasy and fun come to light. Now being completely upfront with y'all, we do not know exactly what this building is for. It could be something simple as your driving down Sunset Boulevard. You see, oh, what's that funky colorful looking building? Oh, it's Five Nights at Freddy's. I'm gonna go buy a ticket to see that film now. Or best case scenario, like every FNAF fan is hoping for right now, it is some sort of pop-up attraction. Whether it be just a shop to buy merchandise themed around the film, maybe some walkthrough haunted house type attraction where it looks like it's actually Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, but once you go inside, again, it's some sort of walkthrough haunted house. There are some people who are thinking that this is going to be an actual Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria. Personally, I think that's a bit of a stretch. I would absolutely love for something like that to happen, but also keep in mind, this is most likely gonna be a pretty small, scaled back attraction, if again, it even is some sort of attraction. I personally don't see them making a full blown Pizzeria just for a little bit to promote the movie. And even Scott Cawthon himself in the past hasn't really sparked any interest in doing something along those lines. It could be something similar to what they've got going on at Halloween Horror Nights. You walk inside, you can see a whole bunch of props and animatronics used in the film. Whatever it is, all I know is that it is crazy, crazy surreal to see something like this being constructed before our very own eyes. I'd love to know your thoughts and theories on this building in the comments down below. Do you think it's gonna be an attraction for the public? Do you think it's just a simple way of advertising the film? And that's gonna do it for all the FNAF movie news, and I promise, next video, regular FNAF news. We gotta get back to that. But thank you all so much for watching, and I'll see you all on the flip side. Goodbye.


everyone and welcome. This is Melissa Armo with the Stock Swoosh and today I wanted to talk to you about the importance of looking at something, having a bias and sticking with that bias. So I did a webinar the other day and someone that was in the webinar wrote in the chat that they had gone along the market and shorted the market on that particular day on the same day. And the danger of doing that is that you're going to lose and consistently you will lose over the course of a year doing that. You can't really get any big moves doing that. You can't really get any momentum doing that. You're scalping and things turn against you very very quickly and you can't take any real size with that. You know again I like to trade with size but I've been training for 15 years. Even if you just started trading you still want to get a big move even if you would take for example 500 shares. When I say a big move in something like Apple I would say a dollar, two dollars, three dollars, more, something like this spy. Same thing. So when you're scalping you're trading for pennies and again if you're in and out in and out in and out in this different directions in the same stock or the market on the same day you basically have no conviction in the directional bias of that specific stock or chart or the market. We were talking about the market where we're talking about the spy and then also you are scalping where you have to click it in and click it out. And when I when I trade fast I'm trading momentum fast while I may get in and out quickly. Five minutes, ten minutes, fifty minutes, maybe even a half an hour. That's still fast. I'm looking for a move okay a move up big like we got today in Apple for example was in calls or a move to the downside like we got yesterday and buy you as a short okay. So you know you can trade fast with a momentum but when you're don't have the direction right or you're unsure of the direction you're trading it both ways that's uncertainty that's a 50-50 crapshoot those are not good odds. 50-50 is not good odds to benefit from the market moves and to make money doing this 50-50 is not good odds you need more than 50% odds. You need as high odds as you can get quite frankly. So you know one of the reasons I designed my 26 point rating system is because I'm trying to get as many points as I can to find the best stock to trade that day we got that for example yesterday in Baidu which we did as a day trade which we did as a short but anyways the person I did not know who the person was that he has not taken my class but he went short along the spy here on the same day. I mean first of all this wasn't a long setup here but theoretically if you went long here you went long because the market was strong it was on support and it rallied green. That was the better play if you played it there. There was no short play in here though today and there really was no long play in here though. There was nothing you do in the market this day basically we gap down we closed here gap down first we dropped then we rallied there were there was no play in the market whatsoever at all and that's the other thing I want to comment. It's dangerous to always trade the same stock every single day it's dangerous to always trade the market every day there's not a play every day in the market there's not a play every day in every stock okay like there was not a play every day in Apple. There's not. So we do different things different days because I'm looking for the best move the best momentum move okay anyways it is so dangerous to train without a bias and with the 50-50 odds when you don't have a strategy to trade that's typically what people do because they're not sure what to do they're unsure what to do they don't know what to do it's a question mark you know in their mind they take a trade long and they kill a quick if they're down then they flip it and go short or they take a trade short then they make a little money then they see it reversion and the quick take it and they go long it's a nightmare like I don't have that person doesn't have a headache every day like very stressful and really if you're trading with size it would be incredibly stressful I mean sometimes I have 5,000 shares of something incredibly stressful to have to get in and out in 5 cents or 10 cents just you know and be constantly worried about the direction if you're in it or not right 50-50 odds are not good odds to trade you must have high odds okay you can say better than 50 you can say 70 80 percent we really do actually do well with mostly shorting but I do go long but you know as far as the system that I look at you know I'm always looking at 20 points or more for the rating system so that I can get the odds of my favor that that particular stock is gonna work that day if I get the odds of my favor if it rates good and the setups there I'm gonna make money on the day and I do so I'm not shorting something like by do and then flip it around and going long it and actually I'm gonna I'm gonna show you this actually does a good example here today so by do gapped up today why gapped up at the market this was not a good long if you went long this today was a terrible idea could you have made money along sure it was this is not a good trade okay yesterday was a trade yesterday was assured by who is probably still lower in fact it is lower but again theoretically you could do you know different things in the same stock of one day but it doesn't mean it's a good trade and even if you make money doing in it Monday you'll lose money in it Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday and then you also like I said we'll have no conviction because 50 50 odds don't get you there you need to know what you're doing either by do was lower by do was higher by do was lower it's not both you know what I'm saying so actually this is a good example because this is a short that we did close to your gap down we shorted this yesterday I actually call it put in it you could have got out yesterday you could still be in it why because it's lower and this would have been a bad trade today to go along it but again you can't do the same thing every day you have to look around for the best trains the market doesn't do every day what you expected to do that's why you can't trade the market every day either okay and just like here and I'm just gonna pull this up people are probably went along the market this morning and then shorted it and they're going along the market again they're gonna and if it drops up into four they'll short it long short long short long short that is a disaster for your account and back in the day when everybody charged commissions it was a disaster for commissions because if you're making five cents or six cents on something and you had to pay commissions it was a disaster some people are still charged commissions most people are getting free commissions but in 2023 but it still is dangerous you never really get anywhere with any huge momentum you never really make the bank the money for the profit that you want and for example again we did Apple Apple was a hundred seventy five percent return investment trade this is not something you would have made that much money scalping so you know look for specific trades to do and how do I do that I use my ratings system you have to have a strategy that used to trade to make the picks every day do not go along the short the same stock or the market on the same day and that's the stock switch tip of the day have a great day everyone