It is now time for oral questions and I recognize the leader of Her Majesty's loyal opposition. Thank you, Speaker. Speaker, my first question is to the Premier. The COVID-19 virus is posing a serious challenge to public health all over the world. Ontario's public health professionals are rising to the challenge and we thank them for their hard work. They're working incredibly hard to keep people safe and informed. At this crucial time, what they need from us is resources and unwavering support. Why is the government moving ahead with consultations on eliminating health units and implementing budget cuts at exactly the time when our public health units should be focused on the important work that they have to do here for the people of Ontario? Deputy Premier and Minister of Health. Thank you very much for the question. But the health and well-being of all Ontarians is our government's top priority and we are putting all of the necessary resources into making sure that the people of Ontario are safe. We know that we do thank our frontline service providers who are doing an excellent job under difficult circumstances and their commitment to making sure that people remain healthy. We are implementing an enhanced pandemic response that formally brings together a wide range of service providers and our goal is to make sure that we have comprehensive response planning that includes effective surveillance, prompt laboratory testing, appropriate care and treatment, evidence-based public health measures and transparent communications. But I will have more to say in the supplementary. Thank you. The supplementary question. Well, Speaker, we've now learned that last week public health agencies wrote to the Ford government asking them to stop their plan for cuts and forced amalgamation of public health units. In a letter, the President of the Association of Local Public Health Agencies asked the government to, and I quote, provide official direction to provide or rather to pause the modernization process at least until the COVID-19 emergency is declared over. A full analysis of the response has been conducted and the lessons learned have been applied. In fact, this letter went to the Minister of Health in case she hasn't seen it. I'll send it over to her by a page so she can have a look at it. My question is, will the government do exactly as they've asked? Will they do exactly as they've asked? Minister? Well, we certainly appreciate the work that our public health units are doing across the province. They are doing a remarkable job. They are working in concert with what we are doing provincially and what we are working with our federal partners as well. It's really important with COVID-19 that we have that collective comprehensive response to make sure that our system continues to work. If it does not, we have enhanced planning, as I indicated before, to make sure that we can take it to the next step. But as you will know, the Speaker speaking through you to the leader of the official opposition, Mr. Jim Pine is conducting his consultations with our public health units and recognizing the extra work that they're under right now in response to the coronavirus, that we are ensuring that Mr. Pine's consultations are stepped back to allow those public health units to be able to do their work. So yes, we are responding to their concerns. We are taking a longer period of time with those consultations because this is a higher priority right now for the people of Ontario. Here, here. The final supplement. Well, Speaker, I think what they've asked for is a formal directive to ensure that those consultations are completely stopped during this time and a reversal of the cuts that the government has already made to public health units. So now more than ever, we know that our public health officials need to focus on that incredible work that they are doing, not spend time fending off the forward government's latest cuts. In their letter, public health agencies wrote, and I quote, the chronic inadequacy of resources to meet our daily obligations is regrettably brought into stark relief when they need to be diverted to emergency response duties. They implore the government speaker to reverse their funding cuts, at least until this crisis is over. So will the Premier and the Minister of Health listen to public health units, reverse the cuts and merger plans, and just give them the support they need as they work overtime to keep Ontarians safe? Minister Verfly. Speaker, very regrettably. I have to say through you to the leader of the official opposition that is very unfortunate that you would choose to raise these political considerations at a time when it is really important for all of the people of Ontario, for the health of the people of Ontario, that we remain a strong, cohesive unit. We are working in concert with our public health units. We are working with our federal counterparts. Our goal, as I would say, Speaker, to again through you to the leader of the official opposition, it should be your goal as well to make sure that the people of Ontario are protected. Next question. The leader of the opposition. Well, Speaker, it is my next question is also to the Premier, but I have to assure the Minister of Health that's why I'm doing my job here, asking her to do her job and listen to the public out there. That's who's telling her to do exactly what I'm suggesting. As health professionals, they work overtime to confront the challenges of COVID-19 and they have consistently asked people who they think might be ill to stay home. We've all heard them imploring people to stay home if they're feeling sick. And so last week I asked the Premier whether the government would reverse the move to limit sick days in the province of Ontario and his new requirements that make it mandatory to produce a doctor's sick note if an employer demands it. We are in a very serious situation, Speaker.  Now, I didn't get an answer to this question last week, so I'm asking it again this week. Will the Premier do this? Minister of Health. Well, I would say, Speaker, that the people of Ontario are being extremely responsible in self-monitoring if they need to. We have very few people that need to be treated in hospital. Of course, they're being often tested there, but we're looking at expanding our testing facilities. Right now, there's no indication that we need to change that with respect to sick notes. As the leader of the official opposition will know, they are not required. Employers are being understanding. We all know that we're in an unprecedented time and everyone is taking those measures voluntarily as we expect that they would and they are. Supplementary question. Well, Speaker, health professionals have been consistently clear. Cutting available sick days and making sick notes mandatory is bad policy, and it's bad policy that puts public health at risk. Doctors, nurses and public health professionals have implored the government to reverse their plans. We're ready and able to work with the government on legislation, Speaker. Something like that could be done easily in this week. We could get that done. Will the government do it? Minister? I would say the leader of the official opposition. We are in daily contact with health professionals across the province. They are working very hard. We thank them very much for their hard work, but also the people of Ontario are also being very responsible and employers are being very responsible. It's not necessary to raise that legislation to bring that back because people are voluntarily doing that because they all know that this is important to everyone in Ontario. Great people in Ontario. The final supplementary question. Well, Speaker, being in contact with health officials isn't good enough. You have to actually listen to their advice. That's what you have to do. Doctors, nurses and public health officials have been very clear with this government. Laws that discourage people from taking sick days are going to put public health at risk. Forcing public health units to plan for mergers when they're trying to contain the spread of COVID-19 puts public health at risk. Cuts to public health budgets put public health at risk, Speaker. So why is the government determined to plow ahead with all of these policies when it is so clear that this is not the way to respond to the threat of COVID-19? Minister? Several things here. First of all, that we are working with our public health units. They understand that any changes that were made last year will be mitigated financially by this government. We have been listening to them. That being said, we are working on a daily basis with our public health officials as well as with our Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Williams, as well as Dr. Yaffe, as well as Dr. De Villa, who in the City of Toronto is doing a fantastic job, as well as all of our public health units across this province. We all understand that this is a very difficult health situation that we're facing right now, but we do have a system in place that is working, and we need to make sure that we continue to rely on the medical evidence, the scientific evidence that we receive. That is what I am relying on, and we are receiving very good advice. Thank you. Next question, a member for Davenport. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Acting Premier. The increase in class sizes the government imposed this year had real consequences for students in the form of hundreds of cancelled classes and layoffs for teachers and education workers. The latest version of the Fort Conservative plan means class sizes are set to go up again next year. Something the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said could mean 4,000 teaching positions gone by 23-24. Speaker, there were 7,000 responses and over 10,000 pages of submissions to this government's consultation that cost them a million dollars. Overwhelmingly, parents, students, teachers, education workers and experts said no to higher class sizes. Why does the government continue to ignore them? Minister of Education. Well, thank you very much, Speaker. I think we're not getting with one aim, and that is to get a deal that keeps every child in this province in class. That is our obligation, it is our commitment and that's why we're working hard at the table. We invite all of our Federation partners to work with us over the coming days to provide the stability that children in this province deserve after 300-plus days of negotiating. In our announcement, we've been clear we're going to freeze classroom sizes, Speaker, 23 in elementary school, in high school and 24.5 in elementary school. We're going to make sure that everything flows to those with the greatest needs. Speaker, we're going to protect all-day kindergarten. This is a balanced plan while we ensure that merit guides hiring. It is a prudent plan, a positive plan for students, and the time is now to get this done, Speaker. Supplementary. Mr. Speaker, back to the acting premier. This government wasted $7 million trying to sell a plan that no one is buying. Speaker, this government needs to stop treating the future of our children's education as a public relations exercise and stop treating our kids like bargaining chips. They will continue. While they continue to ignore the will of Ontarians, we're going to help bring those voices back to the conversation. Last week, we posted the summary of their million-dollar consultation that they completely buried. Today, we're posting the 7,000 individual submissions online to once again show that Ontarians do not want crowded classrooms and fewer supports for their kids. Will the Minister of Education stop this game of bait-and-switch and listen this time? Minister of Education. Thank you very much, Speaker. I think what Ontarians clearly want is a deal that keeps kids in class and this government is absolutely committed to doing that. Speaker, in the public discourse there's a variety of polling that I think demonstrates a momentum towards getting a deal, but not just any deal, a good deal. There's a lot of classroom sizes that ensures class and investments in special education continue to flow to the greatest need. It ensures the merit guides hiring. It ensures a reasonable and fair enhancement for benefits and for wages. Speaker, our aim is to get a deal to work in good faith with our partners. Parents have waited long enough. The time is now. Let's get a deal done for workers, for students, and for parents of this province. Thank you. Last week, the Minister of Energy, Northern Development and Mines and Indigenous Affairs attended the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada Conference, better known as PDAC, here in Toronto. Jobs in the mining sector are good quality jobs, many of which are in the skilled trades that offer young people exploring a career path an incredible quality of life. Can the minister please tell us more about what our government is doing to support Ontario's mining sector? Minister of Energy. Mr. Speaker, what a great week we had at PDAC, my colleague from Nipissing, and I announced more than $10.5 million in 28 companies supply products, services to the mining industry to create and retain over 180 jobs. Now, North Bay, Timmins and Sadbury have been elevated to world-class mining service and supply cities in addition to the mining activities that go in and around there. So companies like Colored Aggregates in Warren got resources to increase production to purchase upgrading equipment, Red Pocket Fertilizer to build a fertilizer granulation facility at the former Hedman Plant in Matheson, $309,000 for ITEC 2000 equipment incorporated in Rosland to expand its operations and build a warehouse, and of course resources for shift in Sudbury to create a computer simulation tool that will help mining clients understand the supply chain and identify areas for improvement, Mr. Speaker and get those three places ready for the next level in mining. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. A supplementary question. Thank you to the Minister for that answer. It's fantastic news for people not only just in Ontario, but in northern Ontario. In addition to meeting with industry and Indigenous leaders he signed a historic agreement to finally move forward on a corridor that will help connect our region to the provincial highway system. Can the Minister please tell us more about the announcement he made alongside Premier Ford? Great question. As a government, we are very pleased to partner with Martin Falls First Nations and Webequay First Nations and actually Aero Land First Nations late last fall, Mr. Speaker. This was a historic agreement. For the first time ever we have a road map, Mr. Speaker from Aero Land First Nation to Webequay First Nations. That has not been in place at any point in time prior to the agreement that we signed on Monday. That was a matter of fact. Listen, Mr. Speaker. We're moving ahead with this agreement so all communities in the region can connect to the next phase which is to secure and bring good-paying jobs in mining, construction and other skilled trades to our communities. Chief Wabas of Webequay we're looking forward to prosperity so that we can make changes for our communities up there because we are living in poverty. Mr. Speaker, we're pleased to move forward with this. We're going to work with other communities in the area and develop the ring of fire, Mr. Speaker, once and for all. Thank you. That's a question. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Government and Consumer Services. Not even a year ago, the Premier proudly unveiled his new Tory blue license plate design in Bragg that the new plates would be better, and longer lasting. Nope. Since then, they have ignored safety experts and frontline officers, the official opposition, the media, folks with eyes and have strangely defended their plates just to end up recalling them, wasting time and money. It has been a long road to get back to where we started with white plates. We know this Premier wants this all to go away and with so many different muckups this government has a lot of damage control on its plate. The Minister says Ontarians don't understand business. Well, we can all see this government had no business spending public dollars on a vanity project that blew up in its face. We couldn't see the plates, but we can see the mess. Why won't this government let us see the truth behind this plate gate fiasco? Minister of Government and Consumer Services. Well, thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and I rise in the House this week to remind everyone that we've listened to the concerns, and I'm very pleased in the manner in which our government is focused on delivering this plate in a timely, secure and efficient way. And as we're working with our stakeholders and vendors to delivering this product, you know, we're working and testing the enhanced plate with our law enforcement as well as our key stakeholders. And again, reinforce the fact to the member opposite that we've listened to concerns and we're taking action, and that is good news for all of Ontario. Thank you very much. A supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker. This government refuses to be straight about the disastrous plate redesign and is hiding behind a nondisclosure agreement with 3M. This government has made license plates into a political circus. What is clear is we are back where we started with hopefully visible white plates, but we won't be relieved until we see them and actually can see them. Speaker, imagine wondering if we will be able to read license plates. What a mess. This government is testing and the plan and the costs of this vanity exercise. The official opposition asked last week and we're asking again today for this government to let the people have a look and let the auditor general behind the curtain stop hiding these invisible plates behind a nondisclosure agreement. Will the government do the right thing and actively bring in the auditor general to look at the numbers and the secrets so Ontarians can finally see the truth behind these license plates? Minister? Hello again, Speaker. I am very, very fortunate to be in a position whereby we have teams both at the with the vendor and with the ministry and we're working diligently around the clock on our enhanced plate because we listen to concerns of Ontario, unlike the previous Liberal government. That said, I look forward to keeping this house and Ontario drivers up to date as we make progress and thank you very much for the question from the member on. Member for Scarborough Guildwood. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Deputy Premier. Yesterday we celebrated International Women's Day and it's time to recognize the achievements of the women's rights movement and the barriers that still remain for women's equality. Women still face gender-based violence in Ontario and when survivors of sexual violence seek help they need to access high quality services as soon as possible by flip-flopping between cancelling funding and then announcing the funding the next day this creates more chaos and confusion. This government is compromising rape crisis centre's ability to plan and lower weightless. Speaker, can the Deputy Premier explain why the Attorney General cut this funding only for the next day for another minister to announce funding without any details and on behalf of vulnerable women and girls in this province will this government provide stable, predictable funding to Ontario's 42 rape crisis centres in the upcoming budget and will you put your budget through a- Thank you very much. The Associate Minister of Children and Women's issues. I'd like to remind the member that despite the failure to protect women by your government this government is stepping up. I was proud to say that our government is annualising $2 million for sexual assault centres across Ontario. This funding will go to support the important work that we are doing for victims and survivors of sexual assaults and human trafficking with trauma informed care. We are restructuring to provide better services that truly serve the needs of victims across Ontario and for the first time victims are being heard. It is the work of sexual assault centres that will create a real impact to those seeking services and there has been a steady rise in the usage of shelters and other forms of those impacted by sexual assaults and other forms of violence and this is not news. Thank you. I get that it was a 24-hour turnaround but this is a circus without a ringmaster and this has to stop time and time again creating more chaos needlessly for vulnerable people children with autism students in classrooms in terms of class sizes and mandatory online learning. This is not acceptable. The government is reactionary cutting first and consulting later. The uncertainty that Ontario's 42 rate crisis centres are still experiencing while weightless grow could have been avoided and the government hadn't asked the round table on gender based violence. Will you listen to the advice of experts and re-establish the round table on gender based violence so that we can have information that informs your decisions? Minister to reply. Thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you to the member for the question. For 15 years this Liberal government ran deficit after deficit of any money for our most vulnerable women and children in 2013 the Auditor General takes her annual report on violence against women's services which found that the previous government had failed to implement recommendations stemming from a 2001 report that's 12 years right before the election this government also made empty promises to increase funding knowing that they could not afford to do so Mr. Speaker this government is committed to women and children across this province and that's why I was honoured to announce our annualized funding of $2 million for sexual assault centres across this province. Can I ask the government members to stop heckling when one of the government ministers is answering a question? Restart the clock. Next question, the member for Niagara West. My question is for the Minister of Children and Women's Issues. And it is happening in communities and neighbourhoods right across Ontario. It predominantly occurs to young women and girls and largely happens in the form of sex trafficking. The average age of recruitment into sex trafficking is just 13 years old. Speaker, last Friday I had the opportunity and the privilege of hosting the minister as well as the Premier and Solicitor General in the Niagara region to make an important announcement about human trafficking in Ontario. Could the minister please explain to this house what our government is doing to combat this terrible crime? The Associate Minister of Children and Women's Issues. Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the member from Niagara West for the question and for hosting us on Friday. Speaker, the member is white, right. We cannot pretend that human trafficking isn't happening in Ontario. We cannot pretend that it doesn't happen in our communities. We must do something about it. That is why our government announced our new comprehensive anti-human trafficking strategy. The ministry will invest $307 million over five years to raise awareness, work on prevention and early intervention, support survivors, and hold criminals accountable. Speaker, our government has zero tolerance for trafficking and is determined to support survivors and fight this crime head on. I would also like to thank the Minister of Infrastructure for her tireless work on this file for many years, as well as a member from Mississauga and member for Cambridge for their work this past summer in hosting roundtables with those in the front lines. Speaker, our plan was created from the feedback we heard from those that this crime impacts, and it will have more to say in the supplementary. Thank you. The supplementary question. I would like to thank the Minister for her leadership on this file and also acknowledge the work of the Minister of Infrastructure as well as the Solicitor General on this important file. Speaker, the Minister mentioned roundtables and listening to those on the front lines. We are hosting the Minister as well as many different organizations in a roundtable to deal specifically with human trafficking. I know we heard from many of those who have worked on the front lines and fighting against traffickers as well as those who are providing care such as mental health support to survivors as well as hearing survivors' voices. At this table we heard about the devastating impacts of this crime on indigenous and marginalized women in the Niagara region and across the province. These stories were real, they were personal, and they were gut-wrenching. Speaker, could the Minister tell us what she learned from the roundtables and how this was implemented into our strategy? Minister to reply. Again, for the member for that question and for the work that he is doing to bring awareness to his region. Speaker, last summer we held 13 roundtables across the province, and one of the most common things we heard was the need to increase awareness about sex trafficking because it is happening more often than we think. Many do not even realize it is happening right in our neighbourhoods and could be happening to our children, cousins, or friends. That is why we want to raise awareness amongst children, parents, and the general public on what exactly trafficking is, how to see the signs and where to go for help. I want to thank the Minister of Education for adding human trafficking into the curriculum so that children will know what a healthy relationship looks like. And to the Minister of Transportation for her work to inform those driving on our highways on how to spot trafficking and how to help. Speaker, this is not a partisan issue. Response? We need to work across the aisle, work across sectors, and work across the country to take a meaningful stand against trafficking. The next question, the member for Kitchener Centre. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Attorney General. This Friday the Integrity Commissioner wrote in response to concerns raised by the Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission as well as other community organizations that this government's decision to appoint Toronto Police Officer Randall Arsenault to the OHRC was in fact a conflict of interest. Concerns were raised because this appointment comes at exactly the same time that the OHRC is finalizing their report into racial profiling at the Toronto Police Services and working to help rebuild trust between police and racialized communities. The Integrity Commissioner directed Officer Arsenault to, and I quote, recuse yourself from any OHRC discussions or decision making related to TPS inquiry or other policing services matters. But according to the OHRC, policing matters make up over 70% of their work. Question? Can the Attorney General please explain why he would put Officer Arsenault or any other officer into this difficult position? Questions to the Attorney General. Mr. Speaker, Mr. Arsenault was appointed to the OHRC to support and advance the commission's mandate. They provide promotion, protection and advancement of human rights. The code states that every person appointed to the commission shall have knowledge, experience or training with respect to human rights, law and issues and he has all three. The Chief Integrity Commissioner determined that to avoid potential conflicts of interest, Mr. Arsenault should recuse himself from cases involving his employer or the criminal justice system. Any member of any commission or any tribunal is subject to the same restrictions regarding their employer when they're there on a part-time basis. I want to be absolutely clear. This type of limitation is common and standard and the basic advice that the Integrity Commissioner would give. Mr. Arsenault has dedicated the past 20 years of his life to protecting the vulnerable in our communities as a Toronto Police Officer and he was the first ever frontline officer to hold the position of Community Engagement Officer. He's also an Aboriginal Liaison Officer. These positions underscore Mr. Arsenault's deep commitment to breaking down barriers between law enforcement and the communities they serve, Mr. Speaker. Our government is proud that Mr. Arsenault has agreed. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It's unfortunate that for 70% of the job he will not be able to do it. The work of the OHRC is invaluable to this province and its independence is what allows it to hold government to account. The OHRC ensures that each one of us in this chamber makes decisions that protect the human rights of all Ontarians. That's why a transparent and systemic appointment process is so crucial. And yet this government has ignored the agreed upon process and violated the independence of the OHRC. This government is showing time and again that it does not respect the rights of all Ontarians. This government will not ban the illegal practice of carding and it refuses to take seriously racism in law enforcement, education, social services or health care. Will the Attorney General rescind this disturbing appointment today and demonstrate to Ontarians that they are done meddling with the Ontario Human Rights Commission? Attorney General, let's begin. Mr. Speaker, it's very disappointing that the opposition would reject the kind of individual who has experience and knowledge, frontline experience in exactly the issues that the commission is dealing with. Unfortunately, he will be unable to participate in some of those because he will follow the rules, Mr. Speaker. And to reject that he has anything to contribute to the body of the commission is just ludicrous, Mr. Speaker. We do not draw lines either or, Mr. Speaker. We draw on the knowledge of all Ontarians to help all Ontarians. The next question, the member for Ottawa South. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I just have to say, just like the old white and blue license plates, it's good to be back in my place. So my question is for the Minister of Health. Minister of Vision is an important part of learning and brain development. Most children do not receive a routine eye examination before the age of six, even though Vision accounts for 80% of learning. In September 2019, public health units became responsible for a vision screening program. Every child should have their vision screened before the age of six. Speaker, I understand the government's cuts to public health and lack of dedicated funding to this vision screening program have led some health units not to implement this or not implement it fully. So can the Minister explain why the government is moving forward with cuts to public health? Deputy Premier and Minister of Health. Well, I thank the member very much for the question as I've indicated in previous responses, there has been a change. However, as of January 1st this year, but the change has been mitigated. Any impacts have been mitigated so that there is an opportunity for all public health units to continue in their basic operations. That is what they are able to do. They are under there are working extra. I understand that right now in dealing with COVID-19. But it is very important for every child to have an eye screening done before they start school. That is something that we would expect our public health units to participate in and they are. The supplementary question. Well, I thank the Minister for the answer but it is actually not happening across the province evenly and that is not good for kids. And it is just one example of why public health is important to families. And so, you know, right now we have just talked about, for the members opposite, talking about the most important thing in public health right now, COVID-19. It is not on our doorstep anymore, it is here. So cuts and proposed changes to cost share in public health risk diminishing capacity. And I know the Minister is talking about mitigating things right now, that is fine. But when you talk about cutting, people make decisions. Right? And they make decisions just like happen in education where the class sizes grew because boards felt they had to make a decision. So I am asking you today, through you Speaker, will the Minister commit today not to cut base funding for public health units and not to change the cost share in the next budget? Thank you Mr. Speaker. Thank you very much for the question. The changes were made of course before the coronavirus hit Ontario. That said our public health units are responding very capably to this. If there are issues where they are not able to provide their basic funding, then I urge them to be in contact with us. We want to work with them to make sure that they can. The changes were made so that every public health unit should be able to conduct their basic activities with respect to children's vision and the other issues. They are dealing with COVID-19 right now. As I indicated in a previous response that Mr. Pine with the consultations that he is doing, he is slowing down on those or holding them in abeyance while the public health units deal with COVID-19. We need to make sure that we deal with the most pressing issues. COVID-19 is the most pressing issue in Ontario right now. Public health units are responding very appropriately to that. Next question, the member for Milton. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Finance. Our government has continued to respond quickly and appropriately to the developing situation around COVID-19. We learned this morning that trading was halted on TSX after stock prices fell and continues to prioritize the health and public safety. We are also well aware of the potential economic impact of this situation as it continues to unfold. Could the Minister please inform the House what led to the temporary halt on trading this morning? Mr. Finance. Mr. Speaker, thank you to the member for Milton for that question. What we saw this morning was the systems that support our capital markets working. Mr. Speaker, trading on major North America exchanges including the TSX was temporarily halted this morning. At 9.46 a market one or a level one market wide circuit breaker was triggered on the TSX as on several other markets and that triggering halted temporarily the trading of stocks. Mr. Speaker, we continue to monitor this situation closely. COVID-19 is having an impact on the economy and be assured that we are working diligently to be aware of its potential economic impact as the situation continues to unfold. Mr. Speaker, our government is aware of the uncertainty that currently exists but understand the importance of managing these risks. Could the Minister please explain the steps our government is taking to ensure we are prepared to respond to the potential economic impact as the situation continues to unfold. Mr. Speaker, our government is aware of the potential economic impact as the situation continues to unfold. Mr. Speaker, thank you again to the member. First and foremost I know all of this in this legislature our thoughts are with those who are directly affected and those families. Mr. Speaker, again I want to commend the work of the Deputy Premier and the Minister of Health and all of the frontline health professionals who are making a difference right now to make sure that Ontario's response is the proper response. Mr. Speaker when it comes to the economy my finance Minister colleagues across the country to ensure that we are coordinating our response and that we are aware of the economic impacts this province will make sure that the resources that are necessary to respond to this health emergency are in place and Mr. Speaker we will also make sure that we monitor the economic impacts and that we are diligent about ensuring that not only the health and safety of Ontarians is protected but the economy is protected as well. Thank you. The next question the member for University of Rosdale University of Rosdale. My question is to the Premier. Over 50,000 transit riders in the GTA take both GO Transit and the TTC on their daily commute. Metrolinx currently has a discounted double fare program that saves these riders up to $720 a year. But at the end of this month, March 31 the discounted double fare program is ending. Residents of the GTA are already paying hundreds of dollars a month to commute using public transit. Instead of forcing 50,000 transit riders to pay an extra $720 a year will the Premier reverse his cuts and keep the discounted double fare program? The Associate Minister of Transportation GTA. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker our ministry is aware that the contract is nearing its end on March 31st and that's thanks to the Kathleen Wynn and Dalduca Government that did not budget appropriately to keep this program going but that being said Mr. Speaker our Minister of Transportation has taken concrete action a number of months ago she has instructed and directed Metrolinx to work very closely with the TTC to come up with solutions and recommendations. Mr. Speaker those recommendations have now been submitted to the Ministry of Transportation for the Minister's review and she will have more to say in the upcoming days. Thank you. The clock Remind the members that when we refer to each other we're going to refer to each other by our riding name or our ministry title correct ministry title by the way as appropriate. Start the clock supplementary question. Thank you Speaker. This cut is on this Government Liberal Government had their own cuts. This cut is on this Government. In the last budget the Premier cut Metrolinx's annual funding by $184 million. This Government cancelled hundreds of millions of dollars in planned annual gas tax funding the municipal transit systems were counting on. It is this Government that is forcing transit riders to pay an extra $1200 a year to park their car at GO stations and it is this Government that is forcing over 50,000 GO riders to pay $720 a year starting March 31. Will the Premier stop making life more unaffordable for people and reverse these transit cuts? Minister Thank you very much I want to remind everybody in the House that it was that party that supported the previous Liberal Administration 97% of the time Opposition come to order And while that previous Administration ignored the transit needs of the people in Toronto and in the greater Toronto area we are not that is why we have made a historic investment of $28.5 billion But do you know what that means? That means hundreds of thousands of people are going to have access to subways That is going to break relief to hundreds of Ministers doing Thank you Next question, Member for Flambor Good morning Mr Speaker and my question is to the Minister of Labour Training and Skills Development We know that the previous Liberal Government sit here happy to defend the status quo but in 2016 the Auditor General discovered that under their watch only 1% of people on social assistance found work The Liberals did absolutely nothing to fix this Zero In the last election people across Ontario including in my writing of Flambor O'Glandrick voted for change They voted for a Government that would put people first in making action In my community a new system manager was recently selected to improve results that help more people find and keep quality jobs Can the Minister please tell us more about selection of service managers and how this will help people find good jobs Good question Well thank you to our outstanding member from Flambor O'Glandrick for that great question this morning Mr Speaker I would like to ensure that people find and keep quality jobs in Ontario In a highly competitive open and fair process 16 qualified bidders competed to improve our employment services The technical strengths of a proposal finding the managers best suited to deliver results were weighed approximately 3 times more than the cost of the proposal Mr Speaker Non-profit consortium FedCap of Hamilton Nagra Michael Boskett Opposition come to arms Services in New York City has worked with them for 8 years He described them as thorough and comprehensive Member for Nagra Falls will withdraw the unparliamentary comment that he just made Minister, wind up your answer please He described them as thorough and comprehensive He said they help people meet their maximum level of self-sufficiency Mr Speaker, that's what we want for the people of Ontario better employment outcomes The supplementary question Thank you Minister Clearly our government is looking for the best and most qualified candidates to manage our employment services And I'm pleased that FedCap was selected in Hamilton Nagra The consortium also includes current leaders in our system FedCap has 85 years of experience helping those with disabilities find work In fact, they often serve even more clients with barriers than they are required to do While the opposition continues to defend a failing system that is leaving people behind our government is putting people at the centre of every decision that we make Can the Minister please tell us who is selected? Minister Thank you again Mr Speaker I want to thank the MPP who is clearly the strongest voice in this house for Hamilton Member for Hamilton East Stony Creek come to order Restart the clock Minister, please conclude your answer Please Mr Speaker, that we have selected Sir Stanford Fleming College and Muskoka Quarthas and APM Group in Peel Region Each year they serve 3,000 job seekers APM Group has been serving people with disabilities for over 25 years Last year alone Mr Speaker they served 350,000 people across 670 locations in 10 countries Mr Speaker, our government will always stand with the most vulnerable people in this province We'll give them a hand up and we'll work with them every single day to find meaningful employment Good morning Mr Speaker My question is for the Deputy Premier We are in the midst of a housing crisis After 15 years of liberal inaction the Conservatives continue to turn a blind eye to the skyrocketing housing costs In my riding we are losing the few affordable rental units still available My constituents recently came to me upset that they are non-profit housing provider The new Spadina Government Corporation located at 3561 Eglinton Avenue West is changing their rent gear to income units to market rent units resulting in some tenants seeing $1,000 a month rent increases People are being priced out of their own homes That is wrong Mr Speaker Why has this government done nothing to protect tenants during this housing crisis Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Thank you very much Speaker and through you to the Member for York South West I want to thank you very much for the question I know how crucial a home is It basically is a pivotal port in anyone's life So I hear what you're saying and I understand the stress that some of your constituents are going through based on the little bit of example that you've given me Rental housing is a very important part of our housing supply action plan It's something that was one of the five pillars of that plan and I've said in this house many times that part of our consultation as part of the housing supply action plan was to look at potential changes to the Residential Tenancies Act We are still reviewing what we heard as part of the housing supply action plan and I'll have more to say in the coming days The supplementary question Thank you Again my question is to the Deputy Premier I don't think I heard an answer there It is bad enough I have vulnerable constituents being evicted but it gets worse This housing provider, New Spadina Government Corporation even following proper procedures we're notifying tenants of massive rent increases It is this Government's responsibility to stand up for tenants and enforce the lax rules that are on the books now but this Conservatives can't even do that I'll keep fighting for my constituents because I know everyone deserves an affordable safe place to call home Again to the Deputy Premier When will your Government stand up for Ontarians and enforce the legislation and make housing providers stop turning folks out onto the streets soon Minister Thanks again Speaker and again through you to the Honourable Member We are reviewing changes to the Residential Tenancies Act We heard loud and clear from both landlords and tenants as part of the Housing Supply Action Plan on the need for change The Attorney General is well aware of some of the changes that are being proposed for the Landlord Tenant Board That was something again as part of our Housing Supply Action Plan that were priorities of this Government moving forward I do want to correct the Honourable Member's record because when the New Democrats and the Green Party voted against the Housing Supply Action Plan they voted against 17,802 new purpose built rental applications from the GTA They voted against a high of new rental starts in Toronto a new high that goes back to 1992 It's a quarter century increase in terms of rental housing Thank you The next question Mr. Speaker Recently the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing was in Quinney West to announce a new consultation From day one our Government has been focused on making life more affordable for the people of Ontario and we know that housing is a big part of that Through you Mr. Speaker Could the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing please explain how the proposed Community Benefits Charge will help more Ontarians Thank you very much to the Honourable Member for that excellent question We know that to tackle Ontario's housing crisis we need to build more homes in this province We consulted We heard loud and clear that home builders want more certainty around this That's why we introduced a new proposed Community Benefits Charge framework The charge gives more certainty to home builders while at the same time giving municipalities more flexibility to fund important community services through a Community Benefits Charge Municipalities are going to be able to raise revenues through both Development Charges and the Community Benefits Charge to support complete communities and I'll be pleased to answer more in the supplementary area The supplementary question Mr. Speaker I'm happy to hear that the Minister has taken decisive action to help fix a housing crisis that was worsened by 15 years of liberal inaction As communities grow and more homes are built we know that they need community services like parks, libraries, recreation centres and more I thank the Minister for taking the politics out of planning by replacing section 37 agreements Through you Mr. Speaker can the Minister please explain how this will help ensure the growth pays for growth Absolutely Minister I want to say unequivocally to that last point that our governments maintains the concept of growth paying for growth and that's what we wanted to do with our new Community Benefits Charge That's why as part of our consultation on community services we heard that things like parkland, affordable housing and childcare facilities that could be funded from this charge We're also proposing to making public libraries recreation facilities parks development public health and long term care all 100% recoverable for municipalities and that's on top of waste diversion and ambulance services being 100% recoverable this was part of more homes more choice our governments housing supply action plan Mr. Speaker we support growth paying for growth and giving municipalities the resources to support complete communities and to ensure that communities are able to live this way to the public And thank you very much Next question member for Toronto centres Thank you speaker my questions to the acting premier one of my constituents Kaylee lives in a secondary rental unit a condo that's leased by a private from a private landlord Kaylee is a young professional who just moved to Toronto she's a mental health worker the unit that Kaylee lives go up by 10%. Cayley has not seen her salary go up by 10%. But somehow, this Conservative government thinks that it's fair that Cayley's wrench should be going up by 10%. How can the Premier justify gutting rent control for new buildings and driving tenants to the edge of eviction? Thank you very much, Speaker, and through you to the member opposite, thank you for the question. I'm going to guess that Cayley, her building is a newer building that was opened after November 15th when, as part of our fall economic statement, we made the change regarding rent control again. I'd be more than happy to provide information about the landlord-tenant board and about more information around the actual lease agreement, which would have had that. So there's a way that I can help in making sure that information is given. I would be more than happy to work for the member to ensure that. Purpose-built rental are very necessary for increasing the affordability of accommodation. Again, from the very first time, that member stood in her place and asked me about housing. I indicated that housing supply was something that our government was going to put as a priority. And again, we've seen historic investments in purpose-built rental in this province because of that policy. Thank you, Speaker. I respectfully threw you back to the minister. We don't need more information about your rent control loopholes. We need you to close the rent control loopholes in this province. It is outrageous that rents can be raised by any amount a landlord thinks that they can get away with. My Riding of Toronto Centre has the highest per capita use of food banks. It also has the largest concentration of community housing units in all of Canada. Speaker, the residents of my riding can't afford 10% rent increases every year without being literally driven out onto the street and into homelessness. Speaker, will the acting Premier commit today, right now, to reverse the rent control loophole created by this Conservative government and provide real rent control that will protect the tenants of Ontario? Right. Minister. Well, again, Speaker, back to the member. The short answer is no. We've seen since our decision to protect existing tenants under rent control, but at the same time allowing for new purpose-built rental, we've seen a huge uptake in a purpose-built rental. It doesn't matter what number, Speaker, that I use. I could use CMHC, Urban Nation, RBC Economics, every one of those reports, and there are more coming every month show that we are going back to historic levels of purpose-built rental. In some cases, Speaker, back to 1992 levels when, you know, her party was on the government side. We're going to continue to work with every partner in the system to provide more housing choice. That's the pillar of our housing supply action plan to provide more housing and more choice and more purpose-built rental. That's what we were elected to do. Next question. Member for Perth Wellington. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Speaker, my question is to the Associate Minister of Energy. Natural gas is Ontario's most common heating source and is much more affordable than other home heating sources such as electricity, oil, or propane. Through our government's natural gas expansion support program, we are taking action to expand access to natural gas to rural, remote, and indigenous communities across our province. Could the Associate Minister please update this House on the first phase of the natural gas expansion support program and the benefits that Ontarians are seeing from expanded access to natural gas? Great. The Associate Minister of Energy. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and I thank the Honorable Member from Perth Wellington for the great question and the excellent work that he does on behalf of his constituents. Through the first phase of this program, un-served areas in communities like Chatham Kent, South Bruce, the Chippewas of the Tams, and Skugog Island are seeing the benefits of this program. Residents in these communities will save between $800 and $2,500 on home heating costs, and in Chatham Kent, the additional rural natural gas capacity could create up to 1,400 jobs in the greenhouse industry alone. In Skugog, where I had the honour of travelling with a great member from Durham last Friday, he announced that that actual pipeline was under construction in Skugog Island, and residents are eagerly awaiting the completion of the project and excited to get connected. Mr. Speaker, we know that expanding access to natural gas to rural, northern and indigenous communities creates a more competitive business environment and makes life more affordable for Ontarians. Great answer. A supplementary question. Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the Associate Minister for his response. I'm very pleased to hear the success of the first phase of this important program. It is great to see that our government is encouraging partnerships between communities and distributors to deliver projects to communities that need and want them. Could the Associate Minister please tell this House about what our government plans to build on the success of Phase 1 and the natural gas expansion support program? Mr. Dr. Ply. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and again, a great question from the honourable member from Perth, Wellington. In December, the Minister of Energy, Northern Development of Mines and I wrote to the Ontario Energy Board to direct them to begin the process of collecting information about new natural gas expansion opportunities across Ontario and to develop a report on eligible projects. Last Friday, I was pleased to announce that the OEB is now accepting applications for the projects to be considered for the funding for Phase 2. The second phase of this program will allocate approximately $130 million to support new expansion projects across our province. I have already heard from numerous municipalities that are keen to partner with the natural gas utility and submit projects for consideration. I was also happy to host a natural gas roundtable at the rural and chiral municipal associations 2020 conference where all attendees told me how excited they were for the next phase of this important program. Mr. Speaker, we are continuing to move forward to expand access to safe, reliable and low-cost heating fuel, which will lead to more affordable home heating for families and more investment for businesses across our great province. Thank you, Speaker. The next question is for the member for Brampton North. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Premier. At the recent Canada 360 Economic Summit, the Premier said, quote, By America, policies are hurting Ontario businesses and workers. DNR Electronics, a proud Ontario business with its headquarters in Bolton, Ontario, has twice written to the Premier to express their concerns that the Ontario Provincial Police continues to purchase and equip OPP enforcement vehicles with U.S. manufactured vehicle equipment. DNR manufacturer, similar vehicle equipment, manufacturers similar vehicle equipment to that purchase by the OPP in the United States. They already sell this equipment for other police officer forces in Ontario, such as Durham, Waterloo and York Region, to name a few. They employ local police and local people and throughout Peel Region. A contract of this type can create 75 to 100 good-paying jobs. Why won't the Premier answer the concerns of an Ontario manufacturer? Thank you very much. It was fun on behalf of the government. Mr. Recognitomic Development. Traders, we have a fundamental obligation to ensure that Ontario companies have the greatest market access possible and will continue to push for free and fair trade, two-way free and fair trade with all of our partners. And we do this, Speaker, by combating protectionist policies, the policies that hurt workers on both sides of the border. And that's why we continue to strengthen our economic tie, Speaker, in the certainly amongst all of the global uncertainty. We find that on the stats can last week talked about the fact that Ontario is indeed a sea of tranquility and our government will continue, Speaker, to be focused on the economy and continue with our plan for job creation. Thank you. Thank you.


Actress Gwyneth Paltrow is someone who embodies elegance in class, so when I think of where she calls home, I envision the same type of atmosphere. Gwyneth lives in a stunning mansion in Montecito, California, away from the hustle and bustle of Hollywood. Her European-inspired estate was renovated from the grounds up to be her dream home, sitting on an ocean view lot with acres of land. Let's take a look. In these videos, we don't reveal any addresses, and even though I've done a house tour of my own place, please do not show up at any private residences because it's not safe for anyone. Gwyneth Paltrow is an American actress, lifestyle writer and entrepreneur who, after six long years in the design process, finally has herself the home she's been dreaming of her entire life. It's definitely the kind of home that most of us have always dreamt of living in. But with a net worth about $150 million, I'm not surprised she could afford to make this dream happen. After being born to parents who were heavily involved in the entertainment industry, Gwyneth would make her big screen acting debut in the 1991 film Shout, before going on to appear as a young Gwentie darling and Steven Spielberg's hook that very same year. From there, Gwyneth distinguished herself from other young actresses in the 90s before deciding to create a very successful lifestyle business empire called Goop in the New Millennium. Since then, Gwyneth is probably far more known for her Goop-erific novelty items like a focus-com device that you wear around your brain to train it to become relaxed or even a pelvic-clock exercise device. However, Gwyneth's fully loaded Montecito, California home doesn't come with any of that. At least, not that we can see on the surface. There's no crystal-powered sweat lodge or anti-gravity chamber, but what is here still finds a way to nourish all of the parts of Gwyneth's life you no doubt expect, including design elements that nurture the body, mind and soul. Hey guys, it's Kara back with another exclusive house tour here in famous entertainment today, looking at where Gwyneth Paltrow calls home. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit me up on Instagram to chat. Now let's get into this video. Gwyneth first fell under the spell of Montecito when she arrived in the city as a young woman to study for two semesters at UC Santa Barbara. After spending close to a year there, she was in love with the place, but before long, she moved on to LA to pursue her acting career. Still, she never forgot about that year she spent in Montecito. Over a decade later, when she was living in the UK with her first husband Chris Martin, she'd recall how much she enjoyed her time in Santa Barbara community. On vacation, the couple would often return to Montecito and bring their children with them for the holidays. They considered it to be their hidden escape in the US. Then one day after her marriage to Martin had come to an end, Gwyneth began flipping through her favorite real estate app Redfin, looking for properties in that part of the country. This was around 2015 and much to her surprise, she found the perfect fixer upper. It was a generous lot for sale with a tear down property on it, but it had all the potential in the world. Speaking with architectural digest, Paltrow recalls. It was like grey gardens, there were wild animals living there in swarms of bugs, but I fell in love with the land and the views. So, in 2016, Gwyneth doled out nearly $5 million for the property, which is situated on a prime 2.4-acre ocean view lot. Knowing the place had a ton of potential that needed to be unlocked, Gwyneth brought on the architects of her original group pop-up shop and the company's first brick and mortar boutique in the Brentwood Country Mart to set about building her dream home. Six years later and Gwyneth's life has totally changed. She's now married again, this time to writer-producer Brad Falchuk and her dream home, well, it's finally ready to show off to everyone. When asked to describe her European-inspired mansion, Gwyneth states that her influence came from. A Parisian apartment set within an old European barn, something with high ceilings, flooded with light, a place that feels generous yet manageable at the same time. Yep, that pretty much sounds like a dream. So, did she pull it off? Of course she did. Drawing inspiration from rugged Old World barns, Gwyneth's team responded with a design that joins both the classic and the contemporary. Her mansion is a long, lean structure that's laid out largely on only one floor with a shingled roof and stone walls that bring to mind textures of old-time construction. Of course, with Gwyneth's commitment to environmentalism, her home might look old, but it certainly doesn't utilize ancient technology. Instead, her home is powered on clean solar energy alongside a greywater system. But the wellness of the land around her isn't the only consideration. Being who she is, Gwyneth is concerned about her family's happiness too. So, she found ways to emphasize the home's spirit, from the custom pewter-finished bronze doors to the antique fireplace mantles, along with the freestanding onyx bar that anchors the living room. In fact, let's pause here in the living room for a moment to appreciate it. The bar is a lighting installation, especially designed for the home by Lindsay Edelman and nicknamed Paradise City from the famous Guns N' Roses song. When speaking about the piece, Gwyneth explained, It's an artistic intervention into this incredibly calm space, like a gorgeous field of punk rock jewelry. And just in case that isn't enough awesomeness in one room for you, there's also a specially designed hammock that hangs along the other side of the room, which has its own jewelry-like details. Paule Trobe, being the furniture-obsessed person that she is, originally planned to do the decorating herself. She told Architectural Digest, I thought I'd get a few great pieces and it would be all fine but as time went by, I realized that there were so many layers, so many things that needed attention that I couldn't pull it off by myself. So Gwyneth called upon her friend and the AD100 designer, Bridget Romanex, to help her make her decisions. What they ultimately came up with was a decor made up of traditional and contemporary and instead, these elements find harmony in understated colors, organic textures, and strong, simple forms. For instance, the push-and-pull between concepts like old and new or soft and hard come to surface in Gwyneth's elegantly designed dining room. Here, the romantic hand-painted scenic wallpaper wraps around the entire space and compliments the contemporary lighting and furniture. Other areas of the house that definitely deserve a moment or two to check out include the entryway that has a killer 18th century fireplace mantle and features reclaimed stone floors. Of course, you just know that Gwyneth's kitchen has got to be a masterpiece and every inch of it is. The most eye-popping feature in this space is probably the massive plate racks stocked full of pricey Hermes dishes. And while Gwyneth hasn't shown off her top floor or the bedrooms that come along with it, her downstairs powder room comes with hand-painted wallpaper as well as an antique marble sink. Meanwhile, one major feature for Gwyneth's sabote is easily her home spa. Seriously, think of an ancient Roman bath but somehow even more luxurious. Explaining their design choices for this space, one of the architects mentioned. It's like an ancient bath house unexpectedly sheathed in these beautiful pale green tiles with an arts and crafts vibe. We love investing in the tension and voltage between things you don't normally see combined. Clad in Bantam towel works, this spa is basically a masterpiece and most definitely the one room in the house that I would be spending the most amount of time in. All of that and we can't forget the yard. Out on the grounds, umbrellas and custom chaise lounges are all arrayed on the deck around a gigantic swimming pool. Almost three years the day that she bought the house, Gwyneth, her new hubby Brad and all their kids finally moved into the place. Three years after that, the renovations in their home were finally complete. When asked if she has any big takeaways from her nearly six-year journey in finding the perfect home, Gwyneth told Architectural Digest. There will always be pain points in a project like this but keep your eyes on the big picture. This house has taught me so much about patience and gratitude. If you commit to design integrity and character, you'll never be sorry. Yeah, I agree. If you manage to earn enough money running a lifestyle empire and can afford to live in a house especially designed for you in every way, how could you possibly wind up disappointed? Gwyneth sure hasn't and I'm happy she's decided to share her new abode with all of us. Alright guys, that's gonna bring our Gwyneth Paltrow house tour to an end. What did you guys think of our stunning Montecito estate? Is it everything you imagined it would be? As usual, let me know down in that comment section. Thanks for watching. Don't forget to follow me on Instagram and I'll see you all in the next video. Bye!


So you want to get familiar with the basic brushes, not a problem. So the general rule for sculpting is start with the biggest brushes and make your way to the smaller ones. The first brush in most projects is going to be the move brush. This lets you grab huge chunks of the model and squish them around to get the basic shape you need fast. And if you hold alt you'll be able to push things forwards and backwards. Once you're happy with the basic shape you'll generally use the clay buildup brush to define major features like eyebrow ridges, bone structures and tendons. You'll probably bounce back and forth between clay, smooth, clay, smooth until all the major features are built. Then you'll take the standard brush and start making smaller adjustments to the overall shape. Most of the time you'll probably either be using the standard brush or the move brush. When you get to the middle end of your shape that's when you start to carve the sharper details in with the damn standard. I personally use the damn standard a lot when carving out specific features. For example in the last project the ribbed area for the torsos on all the bad guys were carved in using the damn standard. Not only does it cut inside but if you hold alt it can also make sharp edges come out. And remember any time you need a perfect straight line if you just turn the lazy mouse on, left click and hold shift, when you release shift it will draw a perfectly straight line which is really useful when you're doing hard surface. Speaking of hard surfaces, here are the brushes that I believe helped me the most. Any time you want something to be perfectly flat, find an area with the ideal flatness you want and then use the planar brush. This brush will flatten anything higher than the starting point. Or if you hold alt it will do the opposite of course which will raise anything lower than the starting point. It generally works better if you have a bigger brush. And if you want to flatten something super aggressively, use the trim adaptive brush. It's like the planar brush but way stronger. You can tell it gives no f***s about what's in the way and flattens everything at the same height as the starting point. And last let's say you want something to be flat but not perfectly flat. Like there's an edge that you kind of want to bevel out. Well that's when you would use the trim dynamic. It's not as consistent as the adaptive but it tries to flatten things while keeping the terrain in mind. The more you scrub, the more it will flatten the surface. There are other brushes like the pinch which brings things together or if you hold alt it will split things apart and the inflate brush which is great for making boobs bigger or smaller. But the ones that I just covered are the brushes that I use the most. Hope that helps. And as always up here for a fantastic day and I'll see you around.


I welcome everyone to the 23rd meeting of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee in 2022. Our first agenda item is the decision on taking business in private. Are the committee in agreement to taking item three and any future consideration of a complaint report from the acting commissioner for ethical standards in public life in Scotland in private? Are we in agreement? I'm grateful. O'r second agenda item ar gyflwyno'r crosпарty. The crosparty group, on the prevention and healing of adverse childhood experiences, currently does not have any active MSP members or office bearers. The CPG is therefore in breach of section 6 of the Code of Conduct which sets out the rules by which a CPG must comply. Without that in mind, the proposal before us is that we withdraw recognition from this CPG. I know we've had a paper. Would anyone like to make any comments before we move to it? Then I'm grateful. So our members in agreement withdraw the recognition from the cross-party group on prevention and healing of adverse childhood experiences. Agreed. This is agreed. The clerks will now write accordingly to the secretariat to let them know of this decision. I will now move this meeting into private.