So with the 1.0.3 patch now within Diablo 4, we have seen significant improvements in regards to experience awarded from Nightmare Dungeons. I did a little bit of testing now guys, the patch is brand new and let me tell you, the changes are unreal in regards to that experienced people, today we're getting to it all. How's it going guys? My name's DPJ and if you do enjoy the video, leave a like, it really helps out and if you like what you see and want to see more, be sure to subscribe. So they stayed within the patch notes that they have significantly increased the experience awarded to players for completing Nightmare Dungeons and significantly increased the experience gained from killing monsters in Nightmare Dungeons 2 and let me tell you guys, it is unbelievable. I decided to use one of my favourite places for co-op farming anyway, within the champion's demise, I run it solo and you can see I'm basically a level 80 here, you can see from where I started this dungeon, up until where I finished it and look at the XP increase, I did this solo without a potion, nothing co-op, this is solo running it, yeah I think the enemies were like 4 or 5 levels above me, maybe 6 levels above me, but it was still walking the park, the XP gains are absolutely unreal here, I'm not even joking now, I don't play on PC, so I don't know the exact numbers here, the differences but maybe doubled, I'm not even sure, there's no change in regards to monsters in dungeons that I've noticed, I've run a few Nightmare Dungeons now, XP in all of them seems so much better, it really does, now what I will say is guys it seems as though they have patched, now I did do a video on the patch notes and I'm not aware of them saying they fixed or nerfed the ability to farm Nightmare Dungeons but that definitely seems the case for me now, I tried the usual starting up a Nightmare Sidural, going to said Nightmare Dungeon, running inside of it, coming back out of it, going to another dungeon on the map, it doesn't matter which one it is, I complete the first objective, in fact I completed a couple of adjectives, left went back to the Nightmare Dungeon, went into it, farmed half of it, left it, went back into it and it hadn't reset, so I'm not sure you can do that now, I'm not sure you can farm Nightmare Dungeons, either or guys, in regards to XP you earned from Nightmare Dungeons is absolutely ridiculous now, it's not even a joke, so what I will tell you guys is, same rules apply really in regards to enemies, levels and you if they're 3 above you or more that's where you're going to get the best XP, I'd probably roughly aim for getting enemies to be 3 levels above you, but in regards to the dungeons you want to look at it for with those Sidurals, I mean Champion's Demise is great if you're playing in a team, if you're playing in a party of 3 or more, Champion's Demise is absolutely unreal, but there's still other dungeons you can do, All Door's Cave is probably my favourite in regards to XP and Efficiency, you can earn tons of this in this one guys, you really can, the Demon's Wig is another great dungeon to do as well, I mean I would say farm but you can't farm Nightmare versions, the Haunted Refuge isn't too bad either, I really like the Iron Hold, I mean this was nerfed into the Grand Prior but it's still a semi-decent dungeon you can farm, I mean if you get a Nightmare version of this it's going to be absolutely unreal, Blind Bowels ain't as good as it once was but it's still a great great dungeon to do, the Domhain Tunnels I believe that's pronounced that way, Located here on the map this is also a great one to run also, Efficiency wise as well it's one of the better ones and I also love the Forgotten Ruins too, I mean these are all great dungeons you can use in regards to Nightmare versions, I mean look out for these ones they're way more efficient than the rest, in my experience anyway in earning that XP but yes people I wanted to do a little test in regards to how much XP you would earn from these, now after well post 1.0.3 and let me tell you the XP gains now is significantly like they said significantly more, so in regards to farming the same dungeon over and over I'm not sure guys that is really needed now because Nightmare dungeons like I said they give you an absolute ton of that XP, now I will try the Haltide event because I hear these are absolutely incredible too, now Haltide events I'm not gonna lie where my favorite farm I mean in the game for XP I mean yes to own it here for an hour but within that hour guys I was earning way more XP from Haltides than what I'd earn from any dungeon and out of significantly increased XP you'll get when opening chests so the more enemies you destroy the more cylinders you collect the more chests you can open up I mean it's gonna be crazy for that XP and again yes like I said I ran Champion's Demise you'll see in gameplay that in the background now and by the way guys feel like my Necromancer nun bone build by the way any interested in what I have going on here I uploaded a video last night on this exact build so do check it out guys it's pretty decent I'm not gonna lie for a nun bone build for the Necromancer anyway but yes I decided to run the Champion's Demise yes it's a few levels above me but you're seeing guys that the XP you can actually just see the XP bar going up through the group of ads I'm killing you're seeing XP bar going up now run the champions in my solo isn't the most efficient because it splits off into three areas but I mean just may way way more efficient builds out there the mine Necromancer some of the rogues I've seen some of the druids I mean some of every other every other class I've seen besides the Necromancer they can run things so much quicker so hey you'll be able to probably run the Champion's Demise in under 10 minutes as a solo player as a co-op team or a group of three doing this I mean like I said you split off into three directions you all grab those said things needed you'll get this done in under five minutes quicker than that there's no efficient way no quicker way to get XP in the game then doing this in Champion's Demise in my opinion but again you cannot farm it now because the seemingly nerfed the nightmare dungeon farms I mean if I'm doing it wrong guys please let me know down below for something I missed let me know hit me up on my discord hit me on my Twitter it's a new method you know about it let me know about that too I mean if you were be out if we were able to farm nightmare dungeons now it would be utterly broken it's gonna be way more level of hundreds sooner than later now I believe because of these nightmare dungeon buffs as well because they are absolutely unreal but yeah guys like I said nightmare dungeons now in the XP they give you is crazy definitely try out your favorite many if you got a favorite spot let me know what it is also again mine are definitely all those cave iron hold haunted refuge I mean even car now house that isn't too bad either the dumb hain tunnels is a great one to farm too I mean that gives you some great results there all the wood isn't too bad either or demons wake like I said though it's probably body and the end room of this is just rammed full of enemies I mean there's hundreds in there they might have XP that must give off now is absolutely ludicrous now exact again because I don't play on PC I don't know the exact both they've done to these monsters in these dungeons these nightmare dungeons but it definitely seems it's at least doubled under what I'm seeing I mean like I said you see you guys saw my XP bar at level 79 to 80 that much of a chunk from one dungeon is ludicrous I probably get in half that a third of that prayer I don't know guys you let me know but yes nightmare dungeons now definitely the way forward shame you can't farm them I'm not sure we need to but guys let me know your thoughts let me know your results let me know what you found down below guys if you enjoyed the video leaving a like really helps out if you like what you see want to see more be sure to subscribe and hopefully guys I will see you on that next one


Hi, I'm Ranveer Singh. Hi, I'm Seema Anand, sexual wellness expert. Today, we're answering some of the most frequently asked questions about men's sexual wellness on Google. What got you interested? There's so much misinformation out there. You have somebody who's consuming some... What knows what Baba Kachur? I think this brand is long overdue. The first question. Watch the full video on Bold Care's YouTube channel and visit www.boldcare.com to get their range of sexual health solutions.


FidgetKey and AidFruit present. This week's IonMPI is from Antimatter Research. What is this, Ladiator? Yeah, this is pretty cool. They've got a great name and also an awesome logo. This is a bunch of cool hackers who do product development and they came out with a product which is based off of the XMOS DSP system for doing audio pinpointing. Like you can do far-field voice DSP work to make it easier if you do voice recognition. I thought this was really neat because usually these kind of dev boards for voice recognition assistants are really expensive where you have to roll your own. But this one kind of comes ready to go, which is really nice. So here it is. This is the Accusis-S from Antimatter. And it comes as just like a long, flat PCB. There's lots of mounting holes and there's rear-mounted microphones. We talked about I2S and PDM microphones a couple of IonMPIs back. And what's kind of cool is that there's this rear-mount USB at the top you can see in the middle. The rear-mount USB, you plug it into USB and it just shows up as a stereo microphone input. But that stereo microphone input is actually taking the audio from four separate microphones and like doing audio, far-field DSP calculation and filtering on it so that it's going to work really well with your voice recognition software.  Or, you know, you can try to figure out what people are trying to ask you to do based on like certain commands that your product or project may have. But one of the hardest things about audio is unlike video where you can usually just add lighting or like control where you're, you know, you're doing your vision recognition. And audio, like you can't add anything to make it easier to hear. You have to subtract, which you can't really do because you have like, you know, microphones and humans and you've got traffic and you've got people loading the dishwasher and you've got the air conditioning going off. So all of this like background audio makes it really hard to do audio recognition well. And so if you can do any kind of edge processing, that'll make your results much better. So XMOS came out with this chip and this is like an all-in-one DSP chip that I guess you program it and it has built-in support for four microphones. It's called the XMOS XVF350DSP. It also has some Philips B-Clear technology, I guess, inside of it. And you kind of hook it up to the microphones. I guess you can program it probably to do any other extra calculations or filtering you need. And then yeah, it shows up as a USB device, which is pretty sweet. So this is the chip. And of course, you know, this is kind of, think of this as a dev board for this kit. If you're making less than a thousand or maybe 5,000 of your final product or project, you can definitely use this dev board just as is. It's plug-and-play, use it. It works with Mac, Windows, Linux. They have a couple of demos with Raspberry Pi. So it definitely will work on low-power single-board computers. And then you can also check out XMOS if you want to program this chip with more custom calculations that you may need for your product or project. I think that's if you get to like the 5,000, 10,000 plus units. That's where you'll want to do it. But as it comes ready to go, you don't have to sign any NDAs, which I thought was really nice. You just plug it in and it works. I have one here. I thought I would just really quickly show it off. It's kind of neat. I like some of the details here. So let me back this up. So this is the front... Wait, we'll have to show the whole board. So this is the back. Thank you. So this is the back. So you can see there's this like plug-in USB. There's also a microphone input so it can do echo cancellation. If you have a microphone as well as... Sorry, if you have a speaker as well as a microphone, that way your microphone inputs can have echo cancellation based on what the speaker is also playing. Over here you've got one, two, three, and four of those PDM microphones. And they're panel mounted. There's a little programming header here if you want to reprogram. The XMOS, and this is probably some more GPIO that's available. Power supply over here, more mounting holes, maybe configuration and I don't know what this... Maybe USB interface. And then on the front, what's cool is that there's these LEDs that tell you what the XMOS thinks the current audio location is. Like it's a far field. It can detect where in the room it is.  But then maybe my gracious assistant could say something. Hello. Hello. So you see how the LEDs when my great assistant is speaking is over here on these LEDs. And if I move over to the side, it can detect that my audio is coming from the side. And then I'm over here. Yeah, there you go. All right, so we're a team. But normally I'm right in the center here. So yeah, that was a really cool little dev board. It's ready to go. I mean, it's definitely a demonstration of this chip and its capabilities. But if you don't need anything more than the default demo, then this kind of comes ready to go. And you don't have to worry about this ridiculous like 5,000-pin BGA chip. All right, so check it out. That's the Q-SYS 7 from Antimatter Research. We looked them up. And like Adafruit, they have a team of people and they do cool videos of things that show a little bit behind the scenes. So here's the team doing a time lapse. Kitten, kitten. Of putting them all in the boxes and more. They also have a great video of the test procedure. Often when you're sending out your boards to your fabrication house, these are not going to be this kind of board you can't manufacture with just a toaster oven because the pitch of the BGA chip is just so fine. So they sent them instructions on how to test the board. And it's actually really handy if you've never sent out a board to a manufacturer, you might want to check out that video because it's a really good example of the kind of information and step-through that you'll want to give your board house so when they manufacture they can test efficiently and get you the best yields. And this was an unboxing of the product. You can see a little demo, show how it works on a Mac here. And we also found a video of one of their team members showing it off and all the things it can do. So I'm going to show that next. Hi, everyone. I'm Gladys from Metameta Research and we made a microphone that is perfect for ASMR. You can hear me back here at a whisper. You can hear me from here at a whisper. Imagine all the ASMR possibilities. And like all NPIs and all the roads lead to one place for NPI for new product, Digikey. It's on Digikey site. Yes, and they've got a couple hundred in stock. I picked one up as I've got plenty. You can definitely see the engineers having a really good time and they're also available for consulting. So if you want to integrate this kind of technology into your final PCB, you can hire them and they'll definitely be able to help you out to get that board fully integrated into your own PCB design. So check them out. Metameta Research seems like a fun group of people. Yeah. Shorturl, digikey.com, short, Z112NF. And the part number is 2850ARAC S1ND. And you can also search for, what's the best term? Accusis. A-C-U-S-I-S. Yeah. S. So we do a segment about great search how to find stuff. Yeah. So that's what you search for. Yeah. And you can see here's all the places it lights up. Hello. Obviously robotics, fun, you can, I mean everything has like a voice thing for now. Yeah. So. Okay. This knows who's speaking. It's actually kind of cool, right? It can do like pinpoint location of where the audio is coming from. I know. Cool. All right. You can play with this all day. All right. So that is this week's INFEI. INFEI.


If you look at all of the casualties in every battle of the Prophet s.a.m, Abu al-Hassan al-Nadwih, he actually did a study on this and he said there's about 1,018 casualties in all of the Ghazawat of the Prophet s.a.m. Enemy and Muslim, Mushriqin and Muslims, 1,018 men in 23 years, all men on the battlefield. Musa al-Salam in Exodus 34, he comes down the mountain, he sees his own people worshiping the golden calf, he orders 3,000 men slaughtered on the spot in one night, but he's a Prophet. But the Prophet s.a.m. oh no, he can't be a Prophet. This is total hypocrisy.


Sergei Lavrov also threatened NATO with nuclear weapons. Possession of nuclear weapons in the context of deterrence is today the only possible response to some significant external threats to Russia's security. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in an interview with the International Affairs Journal. Indeed, most has been said recently about the role of nuclear weapons in Russia's foreign policy. I would like to remind you that the conditions for their possible use on our part are set out in doctrinal documents. It is important to understand them. Lavrov's state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is exclusively defensive, he pointed out. It is aimed at maintaining the potential of nuclear forces at the minimum level necessary for the guaranteed defense of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state, preventing aggression against Russia and its allies. In the context of deterrence, the possession of nuclear weapons is today the only possible response to some significant external threats to the security of our country. The top Russian diplomat pointed out. Lavrov noted that the development of the situation around Ukraine confirms the validity of Russia's concerns in this area. Having flagrantly violated the principle of the invisibility of security, NATO, an organization that, let me remind you, proclaimed itself a nuclear alliance, has bet on Russia's strategic defeat. Our forced reaction to protect our external security contour was used by the collective West as a pretext to move to a fierce confrontation using a hybrid arsenal of means, he noted. According to the top Russian diplomat, the great danger in connection with the Ukrainian conflict is that by escalating the situation, the United States and NATO countries run the risk of finding themselves in a situation of a direct armed clash between nuclear powers. We believe that such a development of events must and can be prevented. That is why we must remind of the existence of high military political risks and send sobering signals to our opponents. Lavrov emphasized.


We're whatever part of this great country we're from. We have the same DNA. We love our country. And this may not always be obvious.  We love our food. We love our clothes. We love our merry-making. We love to be successful. We love success. We are resilient. We are fair-minded. Nigerians always fight for the underdog. We believe in justice and the rule of law. Even though our system can do much better. But we are by far one of the smartest and perhaps the most talented people on earth. In Nigerian family, the Maffidons. I don't know whether you ever heard of the Maffidons. They live in the UK. They've been officially declared the smartest family in that country. The designer of that famous car, the Chevrolet Volt, is a guy called Jelani Aliou. He now works for the Nigerian government.


Hello and welcome to the session. In this session we are going to discuss the following question and the question says that if P is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 5 minus 2 0 1, Q is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 1 5 2 7, R is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 4 7 10 5, then find 2P plus 3Q minus R. We have to find 2P plus 3Q minus R where P is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 5 minus 2 0 1, Q is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 1 5 2 7, R is equal to the 2 by 2 matrix 4 7 10 5. When we multiply a matrix by a scalar, it is multiplied by every element of the matrix. So 2P plus 3Q minus R is equal to 2 into the matrix 5 minus 2 0 1 plus 3 into the matrix 1 5 2 7 minus the matrix 4 7 10 5. Now by multiplying the scalars with every element of the matrix we get the matrix 5 into 2 0 into 2 minus 2 into 2 1 into 2 plus the matrix 1 into 3 2 into 3 5 into 3 and 7 into 3 minus the matrix 4 7 10 5. So this is equal to the matrix 10 minus 4 0 2 plus the matrix 3 15 6 21 minus the matrix 4 7 10 5. Now by matrix addition or subtraction for the first element in the matrix we add or subtract all the first elements that is 10 plus 3 minus 4. For the second element we add and subtract the second element of the three matrices that is 0 plus 6 minus 10 for the third element that is minus 4 plus 15 minus 7 and the fourth element will be 2 plus 21 minus 5 so here we get 10 plus 3 minus 4 is 9 6 minus 10 is minus 4 minus 4 plus 15 minus 7 is 4 and 2 plus 21 minus 5 is 18 therefore 2 p plus 3 q minus R is equal to the matrix 9 4 minus 4 18 which is our answer. This completes our session. Hope you enjoyed the session.


Welcome to today's edition of Frightfully Forgotten, but to start things off, what are we drinking? Uh, near-dark, check-dark lager. Today we are doing 1990's Bride of Reanimator. If you couldn't tell from our special intro that we had today, which was actually made for us by a fan, Tyrone Dease. Thank you very much. Directed by Brian Usina, and he did the very weird off-the-wall movie Society, and he also did Return of the Living Dead 3. The movie of course stars Jeffrey Combs, a horror movie legend. He was of course in the first Reanimator. He's in From Beyond, you know, Ken Four and his, uh... His underwear. ...Zergich, of course. He's in Castle Freak, and he's like a Star Trek mainstay in Deep Space Nine. He plays Wei Yun, he plays Liquidator Brunt, in Enterprise he plays Andorian Shran.  Lastly, we want to mention Kathleen Kinmont, because she's in Halloween 4. That's right. Combs do it by the book. We're just gonna take out a bit of a rehash from the first one. Herbert and Dan have this reagent that they created. They reanimate dead bodies for experiments.  Dr. Hill kinda has this big vendetta against mostly Herbert. In a very small nutshell. This movie starts off about eight months later, and it takes place during a war zone in Peru. We learn that Herbert and Dan are medics. Also there's a girl there that sort of Dan's kind of interested in Francesca, seeing all the stuff sort of behind the scenes, right?  They're back doing their own routine, right? At the University Hospital. There's a girl who's dying, Gloria, who Dan is kinda smitten with a little bit. Herbert on the other hand, he wants to continue the research. There's this closet or this room in the morgue, the experiments from the first movie, Police Evidence, which is weird because he'd think it'd be in an actual police locker. Yeah, not just in a hospital, for anyone to rifle through. Yeah, yeah, there's not even a lock on the door or anything. Herbert's going in there to steal items for his experiments, picks up a heart, and it turns out to be Dan's old girlfriend's heart from the first movie. He also sees poor Dr. Hill's head wrapped in the bag and kinda just says hello basically. He's also stealing body parts from corpses. So Herbert kinda just fools around and takes a few fingers and an eyeball, kinda stitches them together and uses this reagent, kinda creates this little kind of monster type thing. He's walking around, there's a lieutenant chappam that's been kinda snooping around. And while he's sitting on the couch, there's this little finger monster thing that's kinda going around him, which he doesn't see. And Herbert and Dan are kinda noticing and they're like, you're all trying to get it? And Chapman kinda stands up and just throws a book on it unwittingly and crushes the poor thing. There's a doctor at Graves, he works in the morgue, looking around and he catches a vial of this reagent and he also sees Dr. Hill's head. So naturally what are you gonna do, right? Well, you're gonna use the reagent on the head and it revives Dr. Hill.  Dan's kind of had enough of these experiments. Herbert has Megan's heart and entices Dan to keep the experiments going because what we'll do is we'll put the heart in a new body and Megan will live again. One day we're trying to steal this dead body out of the hospital, they have it in like a wheelchair and it's- Kinda like Weekend at Bernie's?  They strike up a date. So then she comes over for her date and her and Dan are getting a little kind of frisky, Lieutenant Chapman was broken into the house and confronts Herbert in the laboratory.  He used to say he's dead and he uses the reagent to re-animate him and well now it's a zombie Lieutenant Chapman, kills Francesco's dog, he just grabs it, yeah. The patient that Dan has been spitting with, Gloria, she dies. The first thing that Herbert does, well he steals her head, of course. Yeah, that's what you do, yeah. Zombie Lieutenant Chapman has made his way to the hospital and found Dr. Hill's head, Dr. Graves and forces Dr. Graves to kind of perform the surgery and put these bat wings onto the head of Dr. Hill. Dan's kind of done, right? And he's like, I've had enough and then Herbert reveals their experiment. He's put the head of Gloria on the body to kind of cap it off. Yeah. So it's got Gloria's head, Megan's heart, they're about to revive the body. In the meantime, the head of Dr. Hill and Zombie Chapman and a couple of other zombie things are kind of approaching the house to get their revenge and that's where we're going to stop the plot. If you want to see what happens at the end of Brighter Reanimator, finish watching the movie. This movie is pretty wicked as a sequel, right? Oh yeah, for a sequel it's great. Like why did we see it when we were kids? I think because the movie cover was so shitty, it was just like, again, like it was just like Dr. West like this, like, okay, well it just looks like the first movie and whatever and I don't want to watch a shitty version of the first movie, I won't bother. Right. I think it's kind of, the title kind of has a bit to play with it too, right? At least for me, it's like the Bride of the Reanimator, like, well it's just like the Bride of Frankenstein, like, I don't feel like watching it. But it's actually a super legit sequel and one of the coolest things about it, it is a direct continuation, it's not just a rehash.  Same cast. They literally continue the movie. We're trying to put together this episode and it's kind of tough because there's all these subplots, all these parallel plots running at once. It's not simple, it's not a simple movie. It's a very smart sequel and it's done cohesively, like extremely cohesively. There's all this stuff going on but it manages to stay on point. And it all converges at the end, all these kind of subplots all meet at the end. Exactly. And it kind of rounds everything out and finishes the job, right? You have the plot of Herbert and Dan continuing their work and Herbert always kind of like controlling Dan and then there's the other plot of Dr. Heel's head getting reanimated and trying to find its way back to getting its revenge. And there's also the subplot of like the Lieutenant trying to get them. Exactly. Yeah, there's a lot going on. How does Dr. Heel's head manage to do all of these things? Because he's a very persuasive head. It's just the head! Come on! And he gets a lot done.  Very productive head. More than most whole bodies can get done in their entire lifetime. The production value of this movie is amazing. It's great, like the stop motion animation of all the little creatures that Herbert makes is great. The laboratory sets and like the underground crypt and all that stuff. All of the shots outside of their house with the fog and everything, little cemetery and stuff. And all the kind of vivid lighting, it still has that look of the original reanimated with all like the very hard green... Comedy is wicked in this movie, right? They don't overdo it. Not unless they have to. And they know where to do it, too. Exactly, yeah. I mean, it's done in a smart way. It's very hard to make, I think, a really good horror comedy because they try sometimes too hard with the comedy and try to make it too funny.  Right, yeah. And this movie has a perfect balance of the horror and the comedy. Yeah, and it also plays well with the subject matter because the reanimating corpse is so it's kind of done in a silly way because they're not experts at this. You can go over the top of that. You just got to make sure to do it in a proper way. I like how it's a kind of a neat parallel with the original Frankenstein story. Herbert West is Dr. Victor Frankenstein and the monster he creates is actually Dan. Right. Because he's always controlling Dan and making Dan do these awful things. Kind of created this monster, which is Dan. In the book, what does the monster want? A bride. And in this movie, what is Dan always looking for? A woman.  Right. The perfect woman. Yeah, just like in the book, right? The original one and this one, it kind of mirrors what really happened, you know, two, three hundred years ago with like actual experiments that real doctors did, right? They dug up corpses.   I kind of like how it mirrors this. It's weird and all those weird Nazi experiments and stuff. Yeah, yeah. It's strange, eh? Like Herbert is kind of like that and he gets more and more corrupt while he's doing it too, right? He's gone past the point of doing it for the benefit of science. The characters in this movie are great and the fact that they're able to keep most of the characters, like all the major characters from the first movie, into the second one to break them apart would be blasphemy, right? Exactly, yeah. You just wouldn't have the same mesh as it does, right?  Jeffrey Combs almost wasn't in this movie, right? Right, he had prior engagements to shoot another movie and I think that kind of fell through. So he was able to do this, but like what would they have done if they couldn't get him on board? They would have to write like a completely different script. Yeah, and it just, it wouldn't have worked. Plain and simple. So why would you make this movie without Jeffrey Combs? Why would you even think about it, right? For the money. I guess. If you ever kind of put Riot every animator aside just because you thought it was a cheap sequel, don't. Yeah. Please just watch it because it's as good, if not I think sometimes even better than the original. I kind of prefer this a little more. I kind of enjoy this more than the original. Not to say it's better, but I enjoy it more than the original because it's more, it's more over the top. Right. There's more madness. It's a little bit more silly.  You really get to see all this weird stuff that Herbert was up to, and it also kind of leaves it open for another sequel. And until next time. Keep drinking.   Yeah, exactly.


Remember, a Hallmark card when you carry enough to send the very best. Hallmark greeting cards bring you Richard Widmark. Insert Arthur Pinero's The Enchanted Cottage on the Hallmark Playhouse. Hallmark will bring you Hollywood's Outstanding Stars in great stories chosen by one of the world's best known authors. They distinguish novelist, Mr. James Hilton. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. This is James Hilton. Tonight on our Hallmark Playhouse, we present our dramatization of a well-known play by one of the world's best-known playwrights, an Englishman, the late Sir Arthur Pinero. The play of his we have chosen for tonight, The Enchanted Cottage, is one of his later works, and has proved deservedly popular since its production just after the First World War. It is a warm-hearted story with a prevailing note both old and true and full of hope. Its portrayal of love as an inner miracle gives it a great tenderness, and perhaps no story has ever more hopefully demonstrated that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. And since its theme is universal, we have told it as if it were happening in America today. We are fortunate tonight in having secured for the starring role that fine actor Richard Widmark. And now, Frank Ars, have you a word about Hallmark? Hallmark cards have a magic carpet quality about them. They take you visiting, however great the distance, to help celebrate a birthday and anniversary, bring good wishes on special days or just any day when you are thinking of someone. There is a quality about Hallmark cards that whispers good taste, and you'll send them with pride for that identifying Hallmark on the back adds meaning, it says you cared enough to send the very best. Now, Hallmark Playhouse, presenting Sir Arthur Pinero's The Enchanted Cottage, starring Richard Widmark. In the 1800s in California, a very romantic Spanish don built a cottage in a beautiful and secluded blend, and reserved it exclusively for honeymooners. Through the years, this custom was observed, and no one but newly married couples ever went there. In 1949, this tradition was broken. Oliver Brown, a battle-scarred war veteran, rented the cottage for himself. Mrs. Minut, where are you? To talk to me, Mr. Brown. Yes, who's playing that piano downstairs? A major hill-grove. He's waiting to see you. I don't know any major hill-grove. I don't want to know him. Tell him to get out. Well, he's already here. I'll do my own thinking, Mrs. Minut. I don't want to see any company. Most of all, I don't want any company to see me. If you're worried about his seeing you, you needn't. Major Hillgrove is blind. Blind? Hmm. He tell you what he wanted? No, sir. I'll talk to him. When I'm through, he'll never come back again. Playing your piano. You're Mr. Brown, aren't you? That's right. I'm Hillgrove. I'm vacationing here this summer, and I thought, since you and I are practically neighbors, I'd drop in, say hello. That's very decent of you, but it isn't exactly what I... They're in the house of telephone within five miles of here. I thought you must get lonely at times. Major, I've taken this cottage for the purpose of being alone. Sick man. What do I sound like to you? Was it the war? Forget it, will you? I got mine in France. You've got my sympathy. What else is there to say? Which outfit were you with? What difference does it make? I got mine in the neck part of my face. But it's my head. My head that's killing me. You'll be all right. Don't give me that line. I've heard that routine for the past three years. Well, I guess I'll be going. If you'll help me to the door. I'm sorry I was rude. I guess I shouldn't have been beefing out loud. Why not? But it helps you. You don't beef, do you? You haven't given me a chance. Major, will you shake hands with me and forgive my bad manners? I think I like you. Thanks. I won't take any more of your time. Mrs. Minot told me that you were expecting company. Yes, my mother. She was here last month. I wish you weren't coming. I look forward to my family visiting me. Perhaps you're feeling just a little too sorry for yourself. No, no, no. You don't understand. My mother doesn't have enough imagination to realize that my chief object in life is to avoid those who've known me as I was. Milwaukee. Yes, as I was. Healthy, strong, active. Milwaukee or not, no words can describe the contempt I have for my shriveled face and shrunken body. I can't look myself in the mirror in agony to me. There are days, and this is one of them, and I can't bear it. Life must go on. There are other days. Oh, yes. I dare to go into town, eat a meal in a restaurant. I've even dared to look into people's faces. One of these days, I might even dare to go to San Francisco and watch a ball game. I used to enjoy playing football. I know how you feel. I used to play football at State. Oh, then? Then you're the hill girl. Yes. Well, you were one of the greatest players in the country. You were signed with one of the big pro teams. You had a future. Oh, I wasn't nearly that good. Major, I'm... I'm very sorry. Don't be. I'm not. Now, would you take me to the door? Miss Pennington's waiting outside for me. Miss Pennington? Is that Laura Pennington who comes here to help Mrs. Minut once in a while? Yes.  She's a nice, gentle little thing. Yes, she is. She's a very plain girl, isn't she? Well, how could you know? Instinct. Yes, you're right. She's anything but beautiful. Well, Brown, I... I hope you lose your headache very quickly. Oh, do you have a headache, Mr. Brown? Yes. Don't you have a headache? It won't help, Miss Pennington. Yes, it will. I'll get you something from the town after I take Major Hillgrove home. Please don't bother. It's no trouble. Really, it isn't. Thank you. And, uh, Major... Mm-hmm. I'll, uh, look forward to seeing you soon. You know, that's funny. I never thought I'd be saying that to anyone again. Dear boy, how are you? I, uh, thought maybe with the rain you wouldn't come. I know my duty as a mother. Oh, Oliver, what am I to say to people? It simply embarrasses me to tears the way you've hidden yourself away like a hermit.  You're really concerned about me. Of course, darling. And your housekeeper, that... that Mrs. Minifry, she positively gives me the creeps. Oh, now really, Mother? Darling, I solved the whole problem. Why didn't I think of it before? Think of what? Your sister, of course. She'd be willing to come up here and take care of you. Mother, did it ever enter your mind that I'd be a lot happier working out my own problems? Oliver, I won't have it. I simply won't have it.  Oh, what's the use? All set.  She meant what she said about curing my headache. Thank you, Miss Pennington. Take two now in about four hours. Yes, sure. But I'll be saying goodbye, Miss Pennington.  Where are you going? I don't know and I don't care. May I ask why? Because people won't let me alone. Oh, I'm sorry. I'll leave. No, no. No, it's not you. It's my family. I want them to leave me alone. I want to work out my own problems. I hope you won't be angry with me for offering advice that you won't think I'm presuming on our slide acquaintance. No, go ahead. Whether you remain in this cottage or go elsewhere, it isn't good for you to live alone. You need companionship. Someone to talk to. Someone to exchange ideas with you. You know, often during the bad weather we've had, I've pictured you here sitting alone. And I... Well, I know what it is to be alone. And I understand. You thought of me? Worried about me? I think I'd better be going. Please don't go. Well, I... I have to get home before dark. Miss Pennington, don't be startled at what I'm going to propose to you. Imagine you're thinking about me, worrying about me. No, you wouldn't get on a man's nerves or the sort of girl a man could stand. Look, look, I'm desperately unhappy. Would you give up your apartment, if you were with me, we'd be married first, of course. I don't understand. Please don't be frightened. I'd be good to you. You wouldn't even know I was around. I have an income enough to take care of us. You know so little of me. I know what I'm doing. But if you want to marry, there must be dozens of smart, pretty girls with their own heart. Pretty girls? It's the pretty girls I haven't the courage to face. Look at me.  I understand. You've asked me to marry you because I possess a special qualification of being. Ugly. Oh, no. No, no, I, I, I didn't mean that. It doesn't matter. Goodbye. Please, please forgive me, Miss Penny. Can I, I'm terribly sorry I didn't mean to offend you, but can't you understand that no woman would marry me except out of pity? I know there'd be no romance in our marriage, but we could be great friends, you and I. I'm very sorry I've hurt you. I believe you. I'm aware of my ugliness, but it's a shock to be told of it so bluntly. But of course I see through your excuse. All right, all right. Mr.  Their dreams. Dreams? Dreams as well as night dreams. Golden dreams. Merciful dreams. Merciful dreams? Dreams of forgetfulness. Of oblivion. Dreams in which they are as lovely and as desirable as the loveliest and most desirable of women. Remember that. And that to spare them to complete and awaken is an act of charity. Or I can't begin to say how really sorry I am for my life. I'll no longer hurt you. Really, I'm not? You're wonderful. How lucky a man would be. At this time, there are no strains. No excuses. Will you marry me? Yes, I'll forget. I'll marry you. Dame Sultan will return to present act two of Sir Arthur Pinero's The Enchanted Cottage, starring Richard Whitmark. Tonight, I'd like to tell you a true story about a man who was in the hospital recently. He received many huge and beautiful bouquets of fresh flowers, and he thought, wouldn't it be wonderful if people could send flowers that never fade, flowers that would stay bright and beautiful forever? Tonight, that thought has become a reality. Now you can send a new kind of greeting card, cut out baskets of flowers, hallmark bouquets.   There's a card carrying your greeting tied at the top of the basket with a crisp bow of white taffeta ribbon. When you open the bouquet, there's your friendly message to be kept and remembered. You will find hallmark bouquets of pink and lavender sweet peas, snowy gardenias, crimson roses, all of such fresh colors and gay originality. It's a joy to choose one. They look so expensive, but cost only 50 cents each. Stop in tomorrow at the friendly store where you'll buy your hallmark cards and ask to see the new hallmark bouquets. Now, James Hilton and act two of Sir Arthur Pinero's The Enchanted Cottage, starring Richard Widmark. Several weeks later, Lawler and Oliver were married in a small church and returned to their honeymoon cottage. Major Hillgrove, who had been out of town at the time of the wedding, returned to find an urgent message from Oliver to hurry over to the cottage. Mrs. Minut, Lawler and Oliver at home? This way, Major. Thank you. You'll be the first person they've seen, sir, since their marriage, except me. I'm flattered that I'm the first.  Sounds mighty mysterious. I can hardly wait to talk to them. Hello, Major. Are we glad to see you? Hello, you two. Honey, what's this all about? Oh, Major, if you could only see us. Major, I don't know how to go about telling you this, except it's fantastic, unbelievable. And yet... It's true. You understood from Oliver's letter didn't you that something remarkable had happened to us? Well, it wasn't very coherent. Supposing Oliver, you started the beginning. It all began three weeks ago yesterday, right after we were married. It was storming out as Laura and I reached the pathway leading to the cottage. Hold her on to her, you'll get soaked. Oh, no, I'm all right. Let's make a relevant plan. All right. Well, it certainly picked a horrible day to get married, didn't we? Isn't very pleasant. There. The key to the door's under the mat. I'll get it. No, no, I'll get it. Wait a minute. I believe it's traditional to carry the bride across the threshold. Up you go. Oh, it's really not necessary, Oliver. By what, sir? Thank you, Oliver. I've never even kissed you. Never seen it look so lovely.  Yes, I've never seen it as cheerful and inviting as it is now. It was then, Major, that we both realized that something remarkable and unexplainable had happened to us. We decided to keep the secret to ourselves, but as the weeks went by and Laura became more and more beautiful, we felt we had to share our secret with somebody we both cared for. That's why I wrote to you, Major, asking you to come here. Amazing. And what's more, it's incredible that our marriage should turn out to be what it is when you start to think that we only married each other out of, well, mutual consolation. We have so much now, but is it just a dream? Has it really happened? Is it really happening? We're afraid to let people see us for fear that it isn't true. We want you to reassure us. Tell us what you feel. Please. Laura, eat this gift and enjoy it without question. Accept it humbly. As a heaven-sent miracle. It is a miracle. Wonderful, wonderful miracle. It is. Of course it is. Major, I'd like to ask a favor, please. I've written my mother a letter about our marriage and I'm afraid I wasn't exactly complimentary in describing Laura. She'll be here tomorrow. Would you tell her what's happened to us? Of course I would. The son has asked me to talk to you. My name is Hillgrove. How do you do? Where is Oliver? Your son and his wife will be along presently. They're dressing. Well, then please tell them I'm here. Mrs. Brown, Oliver and Laura asked me to prepare you for a surprise. Good heavens, what is it? Mrs. Brown, when your son wrote you and described his wife, he wrote truthfully. She was a very plain girl. He was? Picture this, if you will. Your son and his wife entering that door, he a shattered, unsightly man. And she a very plain little girl whose very attraction was her gentle, appealing manner. Really? Almost as soon as they entered this cottage as man and wife, the change, though gradual, began to happen. Change? I don't know if you believe in miracles. Modern miracles. Miracles that may happen to you. To me. The day tomorrow that may relieve misfortunes, that may heal the sick, make the lame walk and the blind blind see. Your son is no longer what you think he is. When you see him again, you'll see him as he was, as he used to be, without his scars. And his wife, my daughter-in-law? A beautiful young woman. With music in every sound she breathes. And my ears teach me grace in every movement. This is incredible.  Good day. Well, here we are, mother. All of her. All of her. Hello, mother. I'm glad you came. This is my wife, Laura. It's so kind of you to come and see us. May I pour you some tea, Mrs. Brown? Thank you, my dear. Oliver. Oh, my darling, Oliver. It's wonderful, isn't it, mother?  It must seem unbelievable to you.  A doctor? Well, I'm cured, mother. I'm a different man. The miracle that's happened to Laura and me has changed everything. You ought to be very happy, mother. Huh? Yes, of course. There's no need for me to hide anymore. Oh, my poor, poor, sweet Oliver. What do you mean, mother? Nothing, darling. Really nothing. I've got to leave. I'm in terrible rush. You see, I just dropped in for a moment and well... Oh, Oliver... Mother, you've never seen Laura before so you can't judge the difference. But what about me? Oliver... Mother, look at me. Tell me, can't you see any change? Oliver, Laura, goodbye, my dears. Every happiness to you both. I... I'll write soon, darling. Mother! Mother! Please, darling. Mrs. Minut! Mrs. Minut, come in here! Mrs. Minut, answer me. You've known my wife as Miss Pennington for a long time. Yes, sir. Before our marriage, you were thoroughly familiar with our appearance. Yes, sir. Have we changed? Do you see anything different about us? No. No, sir. I don't understand it. I do, sir. What do you mean? I've watched you both from the start. And I've seen your love grow. And a man and woman in love have a sight that's not granted to other people. Oh, Mr. Brown, keep this love. And you'll never be anything to one another but beautiful. Oliver, if there's a child, is there a chance it will be beautiful? Chance? It's a certainty. If it's a girl, she'll be the loveliest there ever was. And if it's a boy, the strongest it ever breathed. Because of you. Oh, Oliver, dear. I'm so happy. We thought this cottage was enchanted, but there is no enchantment here except what we feel for each other. Here's a new way to bring the joy of flowers into the lives of others. It's a hallmark bouquet, a sparkling new kind of greeting card. Picture of a friend who has been ill, receiving a large cut-out basket overflowing with crimson red roses, fresh in color, and the basket is as beautiful in back as in front.  A basket of roses to help you get well, and this message is inside. A bouquet of roses especially to say, here's hoping you're feeling lots better today, and hope every day finds you better. For then, it won't be too long till you're all well again. Could you imagine a more cheerful way to remember a friend who is ill or convalescing? And there are hallmark bouquets of other beautiful flowers suitable for any occasion, all of them only 50 cents each. So stop in tomorrow at the friendly store where you buy your hallmark cards and ask to see hallmark bouquets. Remember, hallmark bouquets like your friendship will stay always as bright as they are today. Here again is James Hilton. It's been a rare privilege to hear a story of the human heart as told by a great playwright and so wonderfully performed by one of Hollywood's newest and distinguished actors, Richard Widmark. I'd like to add my personal thanks to that of all our hallmark family for the grand performance this evening, Mr. Widmark. Thank you, Mr. Hilton. And thanks also to Lorraine Tuttle, who played Laura, and Gerald Moore, who played Hillbrode, and all the rest of the fine cast.  Playing a part like Oliver always leaves me feeling refreshed and hopeful. Oh, uh, incidentally, didn't Frank Gar say something about some hallmark bouquets? I think they're a grand idea. You know, we have a birthday in our family today. You have a bouquet for that occasion? We certainly do, Mr. Widmark. I'll give it to you right after the show. Fine. It'll be a little extra surprise. Thank you and good night, Mr. Hilton. Good night, and we hope you'll come again. And we hope you'll be listening to us next week when we present Kenyon Nicholson's famous play, The Barker, starring Charles Bickford. Our hallmark playhouse is every Thursday. Our director-producer is D. Engelbach. Our music is composed and conducted by Lynn Murray, and our script tonight was adapted by Jack Rubin. Until next Thursday, then, this is James Hilton saying, Good night, Jim. Mark that are sold only in stores that have been carefully selected to give you expert and friendly service. Remember hallmark cards when you carry it up to send the very best. Richard Widmark appeared to the courtesy of 20th Century Fox, producers of the beautiful blonde from Vashful Bend, starring Betty Grable. And our play tonight, The Enchanted Cottage, was presented to the courtesy of RKO, producers of The Window. This is Frank Goss saying, Good night to you all, and inviting you next Thursday and every Thursday to tune in one half hour earlier and listen to the adventures of KC, climb photographer, followed by the hallmark playhouse. This is KNDC, Kansas City, Missouri.


Going on everyone same here with late in sports cards rip in 22 penini national treasures football first off the line Photo and hobby two box mixer number three random team style. So you look again at your That's your random results As always find those on the website under the results tab as well as the link that's in chat Again, you have James G up at the top with the Giants and if you scroll down, they'll see John and with the Saints on the bottom There you go. Good luck everybody. Let's do it It's do it. So do the photo second do regular hobby first Boxes look nice. They're sure like the color they did. It's kind of similar somewhat similar last year with the dark blue that they had 21 I Guess not super super similar. All right, off we go. That is gonna be a Daniel Jones 61 to 99. This is this is actually Sean's favorite quarterback Danny Dimes He's a big Daniel Jones fan big big Daniel Jones. Truth or 21 of 25. Yeah 25 treasured rookies Garrett Wilson There is some foil missing on the bottom by the T. We'll send an empty box and wrap her with that for the Jets Nice car though for sure Yeah, just 12 to go on the next one stop Mikey. How you doing, buddy? Again 12 to go on the next break Alvin picking up a spot. We're down to 11. Thank you Alvin Let me drop you guys a link again. That's not the right one That is gonna be yes, 11 to go everybody 11 to go Got a Daniel Jones and Saquon Barkley dual jerseys 53 99 for the Giants player worn of Daniel Jones One here for the Ravens five of 99 Devin Duvernay Brad Baltimore My guy right there return all pro at the return specialist position last year Very nice Next up that is gonna be that's disgusting Xamir white seven at 35 Xamir white for the Raiders who's got them in this one nice We've got going a chris s one of one Nike swoosh George Kittle Congrats on that one there chris. That's awesome Player worn as well on the uno de uno Of mr. Titan University himself George Kittle one of one swoosh one of one counter is up to two now Sean We've got auto that is going to be austin eckler 21 to 25 for the Chages Very nice. This is actually pretty sweet four of five Amani tumor nice for the giants. I love that dude Amani tumor for the Giants There is a little indent on that one right there. Oh, nope. Never mind I was looking at the wrong thing very good Thought it was a pretty one-on-one four of five that is going to be tj watt And t signatures going to the Steelers grats on that Pittsburgh very nice tj watt Either Steven picking up spot number 12 again guys got to get the next one filled up And uh, you can add this one rpa to 49 sauce gardener true color Go man Then grats on that one Gorgeous look on the true rpas this year Gorgeous gorgeous hit mr. Sauce gardener And guys 11 to go on the next break got one more of these and then we are straight into our full cases after All right photo time photo time photo time Take a pretty stars and stripes that'd be nasty full of pretty stars and stripes. That's a pretty ginormous card empty All right, that is going to be a uh quarter old battersons 7 to 13 Start first off the line exclusive stars and strips for the falcons Nice one here and it's going to be the Uh modern masters rob grunkowski Uh 16 of 25 These are new this year. These are pretty sweet actually I have to say Modern masters Dallas Goddard, that'll be going to the eagle seven of 99 Grats on that Billy We've got nice one of 10 harry the hitman Harrison smith player worn on that one for the vikings One of the best safeties of the 2010s Love me some Harrison smith This one. This is kind of nasty Lena love this one dude. That is going to be six of 10 vince young player worn three colored patch for the titans that sweet man Got a Justin herbert nice one there. That is going to be 37 to 49 on the player worn to use material Grats chargers. That's awesome some player worn herbert making its way out now. I love that fantastic Got jersey auto The greatest show on turf 85 of 99 kurt warner That's on that one there rams Rams at like 80 bucks. The rams do hit very well. I have to say Grats on that los angeles in this case. It was st. Louis, but now los angeles I'm super jealous of this dude super jealous of this That is going to be jonathan ogden 66 of 99 for the ravens On the nt signatures. That's awesome One of the best tackles to ever do it First first ever draft pick by the ravens. Yeah, when they became the ravens Here he is 12 of 99. That is going to be barry sanders Congrats on that one lions lions cleaning up here Detroit's who's got the Detroit lions patrick e Picking up a barry and then how about right behind it? This one is going to be a aid in hutchinson 13 to 25 stars and stripes rpa I guess not as cool as oris because forest pulled it from hobby But that is awesome hutch For the lions a force to be reckoned with the next 15 plus years in the nfl Very nice really nice break right there Uh do a quick recap We've got mr. Justin herbert No, come vince young Harrison smith dallas goddard zamir white devon duvernais and dango jones seyquan barfley We've got autos barry sanders nice one there jonathan ogden a kerch warner lasting legacy tj watts a five a money tumor to five and austin eckler Magg cards we add aid in hutchinson to 25 stars and stripes We had a sauce gardener rpa to 49 and a one-of-one george kiddle for the niners That is going to do it for the break everybody. Thanks again for getting that filled up We got to fill up the next one coming up right after this


One of the worst things about modern times is ingratitude is cultivated in people They're ungrateful for the police. They're ungrateful for government. They're ungrateful for their educations They're ungrateful for everything people just complain all the time and Allah subhanahu wa'ta'ala says What are you doing? I love you. I love you. I love you.  I Will give you more reasons to be ungrateful. This is a metaphysical equation gratitude equals increase in blessings In gratitude equals decrease in blessings


So welcome again to the translation. We have one of the big ones of Austrian journalism from ORF, which is an Austrian big broadcaster, and he's basically doing network policy journalism. Or we even knew that network policy was a thing. So yeah, there's lots of knowledge that you can impart on us, and I'm quite excited to learn more about 5G surveillance standards and how the cops are trying to make more surveillance happen at the European Standard Institute. Okay, so you don't even know what I'm going to be talking about. Okay, so these are the 5G surveillance standards with the most important people, most very, very sympathetic people. Currently we're actually trying to set the security standards. These are releases 15 and 16, and there's like a lot of things happening there. There's a very clear demarcation line between telecoms on the one side and cops and spooks on the other sides, and we'll talk about their plans, who is important here. I forgot, if you're here from 3GPP partnership group, S-A-L-I, that's like lawful interception. If you're listening, please for your entertainment. Be careful, the first slide is kind of having some problem. Yes. Okay, trying it again. Okay, there's some problems, but it works. So these are the standardization organs like the institutions that are hoping to standardize. The standardization of surveillance goes back to a fishery decision from 1995, and was only published in an EU journal. Now if you provide a digital telephone network, you need to provide some sort of surveillance measurements. Now 1996, they were the first user requirements for lawful interception. The requirements are quite easy, actually, and the users in this case are police and secret services. These requirements are coming from the technical committee for lawful interception, T-C-L-I. That's a large group. There's like 150 active people in there, at least, and it's pretty much everything is in there, like police, secret services. Anyone who's important there is in there. They have these requirements. This has to be possible, this has to be possible, this has to be possible. So the participants, the documents, and also all the meetings are secret. I know some people that have been in there for like 20 years or more, and there's a second group that are basically implementing these requirements, and this is not actually part of the EU, the technical, the Etsy, it's not a public EU institution, it's something that's organized and funded by the telecom, and 3GP, that is for lawful interception. That's a mixed group with telecoms, cops, spooks, and bureaucracies, bureaucrats that are kind of their documents are public, but it's not easy to find them, and it's very difficult to understand them. I've been trying that for a number of years now, and in this group telecom actually outweigh the other, the spooks. There's about 5,000 stakeholders from telecom in there, from telecom and subcontractors, okay, so we once had Etsy an interface for surveillance, it was developed during the GSM time, and you see there's three surveillance channels, of course that's very abstracted, but when you see the green bar, you see there's like network internal functions, so let's just like your Android goes there, the telecoms, they're trying to get all this data from the network, and then via the black channel, people are asking for data, so if there's a warrant or something, then they can see and they can get the data basically, or maybe not all the metadata as we might be able to see, and the red one is core content, that's basically what you're talking about, that's how it used to be, and they kind of kept this with 3G, but that's a lot more complicated, and 4G and LTE, they kind of managed to try to fit it in there, and now 5G, it doesn't work anymore, and this is kind of a change of paradigm, the center in the telecom network where all the data was found quite easily, that we don't have anymore with 5G, so the network, what we will see now is something that we don't see here, which is like the data in the 5G network, that's like kind of behind the green bar, and where we have to get it and where we have to go it, where it has to go, and these specifications are basically what started it all, this was at the end of last year, they started, and ever since there's been like a lot of discussion and they haven't really found any common ground so far, okay, so this is how it looks, what we see here is everything that's blue is interception, and we don't have one point of intercept anymore, but instead we have many points of intercept, why? Well, 5G networks are basically a cloud, a mobile cloud, and what we have as a point of intercept here is basically just cloud segments, this is a so-called sliced network, if you know something about cloud computing, which I assume you know, maybe you even know more than I do, and this is how it looks, I'll explain it a little bit, what goes where, to the right, at the right bottom, there's ADMF, which is basically administration function, which controls the lawful interception, the lawful interception control function, so commands come from the administration interface and go to the lawful interception and are there implemented, and then of course, they need to go to each of these points of intercepts and go into a specific direction, and on the left you see 5G networks, a non-3GPP, which is GSM, and there basically everything is kind of like combined there, and it's not as easy as it used to be, and you never know which point of intercept the user is actually using, and here with this administration function, there's a small red remark and at the LHCF as well, that says target list, that's a list of all the targets that are supposed to be surveyed, and we should basically check this and like check them, so if your smartphone registers somewhere with a whatever, and there they have to already check, is this smartphone on a surveillance list, do we have to survey the smartphone or not, and if it's not, if this isn't done, then it doesn't work, like none of these surveillance works, so as soon as you log in, you need to know whether you need to survey the smartphone or not, and this is where kind of the big trouble started, so security for the surveyors, if we talk about security, then they're not talking about your security, they're talking about security for the surveyors, because they're the users here, everywhere where it says users, it's not a person with a smartphone, but instead it's a person that wants to survey, the person that tries to intercept, and this is where you see this is kind of something, a draft that comes from the other side from the surveyors, and they're kind of problematizing that the most sensitive of information is the list of targets, of course we can understand that, now, well, yeah, imagine there's a list of all surveyed smartphones in the entire network, maybe hundreds, maybe thousands, and you need to check all of them for each log in, do we need to survey this or not, and when decided back, then then in the fishery task force, everything that happens in the network of a smartphone needs to be registered, nothing can be missing, and that's really important, and this is what it says, completeness, it needs to be complete basically, the law says that, and this is why the system needs to work like this, okay, so there's two possibilities now, the one possibility is either, you put the entire list of all the smartphones until each and every single point of intercept, and then every government actor was like, what you want to put our secret list onto the entire network, that's way too dangerous, so they only care about security for them, they don't care about our security, they really want to get rid of our security, and this is also what went into release 15, there's two possibilities, the first possibility is you put the entire target list onto each and every single point of intercept, and then it works, a smartphone enters this point of intercept, looks at the target list okay, we need the smartphone, we can mark it, it's done, but that's what the cops don't want, if the list is lost or if it's public somewhere, imagine there's a list of all phone numbers that are currently being surveyed, that's like crazy, the second possibility is like the slides don't really work very well, so it's not on here, so the alternatives are, let's go back, okay, we need to go somewhere else trying to find the right slide, no, still trying to find the right slide, okay, we'll be there soon hopefully, okay there we are, so every time a mobile phone connects to some sort of cpnf, which is like the radio access network where you get access to something, when the target list isn't everywhere there, then each time you need to ask the control function and compare, so you need to send this via different network segments, and if you do it like this, there's a problem, you'll get latency, what was, let's remember, what was the unique selling point of 5G, very very low latency, less than one millisecond, and this doesn't work like this, there's no way, you know what the government actors proposed? okay, well yeah, they kind of proposed that you don't need, you can't access to one, you can access at the same time, but instead if one smartphone currently tries to access, then all the other smartphones are getting to a queue, and of course the tail comes, said, well this will not allow low latency, because of course this is where kind of the big discussion started, the big debate, and the government surveyors is completely against this, and they kind of want to compel all the tail comes to have this kind of, to make sure that the network architecture is surveillance friendly, so that basically means that they're basically changing the business model of all the tail comes, and that's not actually what's in the EU law, that you need to do these networks like this, of course there's always some sort of, you can always look at it from one perspective or the other perspective, and this is kind of where the whole debate is at, so what might happen if you just check one after the other, after the other, well latency, latency, latency, and that's exactly, and that's exactly what the telecoms don't want, that's an absolute no-go for them, so let's continue, so before voting on this, about release number 15, there was a big presentation by cops and spooks in this working group, usually they're only there with one person max, because you have to travel around the world every two months for the next meeting, so they don't usually come with as many people, but at this single meeting alone, so from PIDS, that's, that the PIDS, that is an abbreviation for platform interception, something, system analysis, so they usually have one person there, here at this particular point, at this particular meeting, they had four people from this particular organization, the German Federal Criminal Agency, that is also not usually there, also had two people there, the German Institution for the Agency for the Protection of the Constitution had several people there, there is Mr. Steinwurke, who I've also known for 15 years now, he is usually there for every meeting, but hasn't, so he's been for every meeting, in every meeting for 15 years, but at least according to the protocol, he hasn't said anything ever in all those 15 years, and then at the very bottom, you see something that's called National Technical Assistance, that's how the GCHQ represents itself, so that's a department of GCHQ in the UK, and they're the ones who train the cops in surveillance, and they were also there with four people, none of that helped, because the telecoms had 5,000 stakeholders in this vote, and so they were just completely superior, so what was the result? So Gilde Kerkhofer was not amused, he's the primary top terrorism fighter of the European Union, he was super angry, how can you do this? And please, this is where you can see, this is how you see what kind of mindset these guys have. They sent a complaint to the EU Ministerial Council, it says the votes of the companies far outweigh the votes of the law enforcement authorities, and so they're complaining that industrial interests essentially outweigh government interests, but well, I mean, this institute is a private organization, so the right to vote in this organization are based on based on how much that particular member organization pays into this organization, terrible, terrible, right? And then it also says, they also said that there is no veto rate for people who basically have lawful authority. Well, what else do they want? And there is no unanimity principle, so if there was a unanimity principle at this organization, then these standards won't be done in 10 years, and that's why, and so they're saying that's absolutely terrible that in a private telecommunications organization, which in this case is, so this is a UN organization, but all these requirements come from Etsy, so sadly, sadly, all these cops are always outvoted, in some cases they kind of come to an agreement with the private actors, but in general, we should start sending more people to this group, so that it's not going to change anything about the voting rights and the vote weighing. Do you know what that means? That's basically trying to intimidate people, that's intimidation, that's simple intimidation, so when telecoms are not by themselves anymore, but when at least there's a physical presence of law enforcement, or if the entire thing is full of cops and spooks, that's a clear intimidation tactic, and that's, and so this guy wasn't the only one who wasn't happy in the US, you may have heard about the controversy around Huawei, I'm not going to talk about that further because we have limited time, but there is now a Lex Huawei on its way through the Senate, which has been written by hard liners on both the republic and the democrat side, and they want to force Trump to not use Huawei as a token in the trade negotiations with China, which is exactly what he planned, so basically they're taking his joker away from him, which is why the daughter, which is why he took the daughter of the Huawei founder as a hostage, that's nothing else, there was nothing, when she was arrested in Canada that was nothing but a hostage taking, well of course, they're talking about something related to Iran and sanctions, no, but she was arrested and that supposed to be prosecuted in the US, and Trump wanted to essentially use her as a bargaining chip in the negotiations with China, and you can see Huawei is also part of this working group, and Huawei is one of the largest payers of membership fees, they pay as much as everyone else together, and that's usually how things work in this working group, so usually there's not that many state representatives, but primarily it's telecom companies, and then in the middle you kind of have Mr. Steinliko, so this was a different meeting because Mr. Steinliko was usually there, but yeah, and so that's where now we already get the response, so this is from the last meeting which was in Poland, which was in mid-July, which was an extraordinary meeting that wasn't initially planned, but because there was so much fighting going on they had to organize an extraordinary meeting, and here there are 28 change requests from the FBI, so this is just inexcerpt, so you can see, these are the change requests, so where does it say FBI on this list? Well, the FBI is called OTD here, the Office of Technology Division, so you don't see right away who is being represented here, so you can't see right away that it's the FBI once you look at this document, so these are several change requests that are about asking for more metadata and more metadata. So, location data, please, so that's the current topic of discussion right now, and that's something that's going to be decided by the end of December, so this means what we can see here in purple are the requirements from the group, and in red is what Vodafone, so Telecom company added, so what they demanded because there will be so many cells in 5G, they would have to constantly check these inquiry, these IDs to check which particular cell any particular smartphone is in. Imagine kind of like a big mall and maybe has like 15 of these cells, and so they constantly have to check which of these cells the phone is logged into and how this person is moving around, that's what they're demanding, so they really want incredibly granular surveillance with data that the telecoms don't even have access to. The telecom companies really don't care about this right now, they just want to put up these networks, and so Vodafone says, oh, it's going to multiply the pressure on the signals, it's going to lead to problems on several interfaces, and it's going to be incredibly expensive for the telecom because they have to use way more equipment, and here, so this is kind of like a foul from a military intelligence service, so this slide is from an institution in Sweden called Föresverest Radio and Start, so it's a conspiracy radio institution, it's secret radio institution, which is nothing else but their military intelligence service, and so basically they did like a foul against the telecoms because they say, and it's also written in the initial requirements, it says that encrypted communication that can be opened by the telecoms has to be sent to the secret services in the clear, so since 2012 there has been a system for payment, and so the payment system is on the SIM card, so everything that is on the SIM card is under the purview of the telecom, and so obviously that also includes an encryption system for payment, and so now the watchers essentially said, well we need those encryption keys from you because you need to give us all the encryption keys you have access to, and so they're basically what they wrote in here, so they basically tried to do that again, and why not because there's a sufficient number of payment systems, so why shouldn't the telecoms have one as well, so the telecoms are the only ones who have to give out these encryption keys when asked for them, and here what they're saying is that if someone who's using this for roaming, then those encryption keys have also been sent over with the roaming to the different country, that way the telecoms can completely forget about their payment systems, and so they basically forced them to do this just because they really were unhappy about everything else, okay so we're getting towards the end, oh there's something, okay so the next meeting is in two weeks, there's never been this many meetings in a single year as about the 5G surveillance stuff, usually there's maximum of five per year, and so this is already the seventh this year, and so there's an extraordinary meeting in New Jersey where Verizon is inviting everyone, and the FBI is just around the corner, just three kilometers, and then there's a regular meeting in October, also in the U.S. That's also completely unprecedented, usually there's only one meeting in the U.S., or not a single one, and this year there's already been, and so it will be four with these two, and so when talking about the release number 16, it's gonna be like beat by beat essentially for the next few weeks, just the way it started last fall, and it will be decided roughly just before congress in December. Guys, like let's lean back, and look at how these two are, like how these two sides will beat each other up, it's popcorn, popcorn, please give us beer to watch this. Thank you very much, so we have 10 minutes left for questions from the audience and from the internet, so if you have a question, please send it on our chat, or come up here to the mic, to the angel with the mic, or go to the front of house, which also has another mic angel. I don't see any lights so far, so there are no questions yet, so this is your unique opportunity, otherwise we'll have a little conversation on stage here right now.  Just a matter of comprehension, it's a question for clarification, so is this requirement for low latency, is that something that cannot be combined with the availability or the ability to monitor? Is that what I understand that correctly? Yeah, so I think that is basically the core argument, but except, so this entire target list is sprayed all over your network, as the watchers would say, and so they're really scared of that, because this target list is essentially their treasure, imagine this. Right now, if it comes out that a single person is being monitored, that's already kind of like a big deal, and everyone's like, oh well, so that person is being watched, so there's definitely attention, there's a discussion, but what if the entire list was leaked of people who are being monitored right now? Then all the criminals would essentially get a new smartphone contract very quickly, and the only ones who are left are going to be the ones who are being watched for political reasons, and that's also not something that's desirable, and so they really don't want that those are being watched, which is understandable, so they have to take care of that, and so these two things are essentially cannot be combined, but at the same time they want the maximum degree of security for themselves, and so the architecture of this entire network is supposed to be measured against their demands, and that's the main problem, so if you don't do this thing with the list, you're going to have this incredible latency, and the entire unique selling point of 5G is gone, so because the selling point is low latency, and so that's why in the telecoms they're not going to give that up for any reason whatsoever, they're putting so much money into this really, really fast network, and suddenly all these people are telling us that we have to make it slower just so they can monitor people in the network, that's a very clear, that's just a very clear hard economics where the state is essentially intervening with the business models of these telecoms, of course a nation state can do that, you can't really do anything against that if there's a law, so for example, Seehofer in Germany, he might be one of the first ones who will ask for more surveillance, because whenever it's about surveillance, he's going to be one of the ones who is trying to help, even if he doesn't know what's going on, and the telecoms really need to stand up for themselves in this case, because otherwise they're going to have to, they will have wasted all this money, and precisely what the networks weren't able to do before is also now not solved, will still be a problem essentially. Is that clear? Yeah, sounds good, so a slightly less informed question, so if we're looking at the 5G discussion right now, it's primarily about the arguments of well we want telemedicine, remote medicine, and so everything, like all these things that need very low latency, and so all of these things such as remote medicine would also be affected by these lists, or would they have separate networks? So that's unclear for now. So there's definitely going to be a sliced network with several clouds that are connected, so for example, the way Amazon does it, so they're basically using the same architecture for the CIA, where you have storage space for the CIA, and so the question is to what extent that is also under surveillance, but they absolutely want, the way it looks like right now, every single device seems to be affected that has a SIM card, so every single device without any exceptions. With regards to medical devices, I don't know, nobody really knows for now, because these networks don't exist so far, and so all of these things, like there will be no autonomous cars without 5G, I mean come on, and an autonomous car needs to be able to drive autonomously, even without 5G, otherwise it wouldn't be an autonomous car. Same for this whole remote medicine and surgery stuff, can you imagine a surgery that is going to use a mobile network? That's an absurd idea, and it's terrible talking points that the same protagonists as always are using, it's like all these politicians who want to show off and to have understood nothing, but want to kind of claim all these benefits for themselves, or we can do this, this, this and that. It's complete bullshit, and it's really mostly like part of the hype that is being created about this, so the question with regards to how much of that is actually going to be reality, that's difficult to say for now, because none of these networks exist so far. So I just wanted to say something, tomorrow at 6 p.m. Detlef Borchert of Heise, and I will have the honor of giving a second talk. And it's going to be called 75 Years of Journalism on the World Wide Web, so there will be two of us, and the two of us together, we have 50 years on the internet, and so there's someone else who also is added. So as the Greeks would say, this might be the non-published, the unedited version. So tomorrow we will be telling you about what we haven't written about, about what we haven't written with regards to certain topics, and that's going to be happening here at 6 p.m. Amongst other things, it will include the funny story of me turning into Persona Nangrata in 2001 at CE, this organization I was talking about earlier. Thank you.


The stars did not wait for you brother when you took my power when you burned yourself in the skies above They looked upon you and felt nothing the stars did not wait for humanity for all of the promise It showed for all of the promise others saw in them, but what of the absence? What of me? We are I am by all accounts and possible qualifications the greatest monster this world has ever saw Perhaps than any world saw and yet brother I see now that the stars wait for us for me Where is the justice in that? Seek it not for there is none, but the fact remains brother the stars do not wait for you