Team keep it clean. What's up, baby? Hey y'all doing hope everything is going good I ain't talked to y'all in a little minute, man I know it's only been like we only been away from each other for like a day But still feel like it's been a while, but I hope you doing real real good Oh you and whoever you watching this video with over you watching video alone Hope you doing good if you watching with somebody hope both y'all all y'all doing good I got a lot of love for y'all and I need y'all help with something We're gonna get into that in a minute, but first today is national Lamar Jackson day Reason being because down here in South Florida Lamar Jackson is having his annual Funday, so we about to head out there in a little bit. Um, so that should be a good time It's usually a good time So who knows who may pop up at this fun day or somebody always pops up who we didn't even expect So we'll see what happens this year, but anyway Ravens Defender who has been getting a lot of high praise been getting a lot of accolades this off season And there's been other off season where he's gotten into but the other off seasons He wasn't with the Ravens, but he received more high praise again, but I just I Don't get it and I don't understand it now when I say I don't get it or understand it It does not mean it's not me saying that he's not deserving of it No, it's not me saying that he hasn't earned it. No, no, no, no, that ain't the case Because I know that he's a ball. I know he can play but me myself. I just don't understand it now Who I'm talking about is Roquan Smith and we know Roquan Smith Ravens traded for him from the Chicago Bears And this was a trade that Eric Dacosta really wanted to make happen because he tried to trade for him And he was talking to the Bears in the off season last year, but the Bears they weren't budging They weren't moving and just they weren't getting and shaking at the time then Eric Dacosta circle back around Because you know when he really wants to play a he will circle back around for that play He did it with Justin Houston. He did it with Yanik in Gakway. So he's up But when he really wants somebody he will circle back around and he will make it happen So he did just that with Roquan Smith and right before the trade there line was up Ravens Go acquire this linebacker who's been a baller with Chicago But now he comes to the Baltimore Ravens and it's like oh man I get to go to a winning team now and he continued to do his thing He made his mark. He helped other players around him get even better and he really did his thing So we know that Roquan Smith can play. We know that he's a baller. We know that he's one of them guys, but this in a recent Pole recent list because again, you know, it's another list. So, you know, I'm with it I love my list But for this one me myself. I don't get in that's why I need y'all help It says executives players scouts and coaches ranked the best off ball linebackers in the NFL So me y'all know me. I'm just a fan. I'm a fan of the game I'm a fan of players a fan of the team fan of the NFL love watching football But me while I'm a fan and I enjoy it. I also enjoy learning new stuff. I'm not an ex is an old guy I'm not gonna be able to look at a formation and be like, all right. That's that. That's this that's there That's not me and I'm I'm not ashamed of that. I'm willing to admit that. I don't know everything I always tell y'all like a lot of y'all know way more than me way more So y'all got it and I appreciate that because that's why we like question from subscribers and stuff and just really going through The comments section and all that I appreciate being able to learn so much from y'all because over these years I have learned a lot from team keep it because y'all know your stuff But there've been plenty of times when I've heard people having a conversation and stuff But oh this off-ball linebacker that off-ball linebacker. I'll just be sitting there. Okay. What exactly is an off-ball linebacker Because Roquan Smith, there was a list of the top 10 guys top 10 off-ball linebackers in the NFL And this was a list that number one was 49 as Fred Warner. See with him. I know he's a baller I know that boy can play. I know he's a playmaker But when you say off-ball exactly what does that mean the number two was Roquan Smith the same can be said for him number three was Tremaine Edmonds for the Bears and I that's Tremaine Edmonds that used to play for The Beals I believe and I'd always liked him. He's a long-arm linebacker And he just he had this reach this reach So and I think there was even a play where Lamar had through it in the middle of the field and Tremaine Edmonds Like tipped it up and I think he actually caught the pick off Lamar like man. I hate that. I haven't till Lamar That's my guy, but it was a nice play. It was a great play And then there's another one on the Steelers who's his brother. It's Tremaine Edwards. There's the Beals one What's the Steelers one? I don't even remember. Anyway, let's keep it moving number four Beals linebacker Matt Milano Know that he can play some ball too, and he's one of them underrated guys number five is Bucks linebacker Devin White number six is one of my personal favorite linebackers in the league is Saints linebacker DeMario Davis Number seven Colts linebacker Shaq Leonard. I think he changed his name though But anyway number eight his chiefs linebacker Nick Bolton number nine Is Jets linebacker CJ Moseley and number 1049 is lying back a Dre Greenlaw I'm not familiar with him and then some honorable mentions were Seahawks Bobby Wagner Bucks Levante David Jaguars Oluqon, I'm not gonna even try to say his name. I don't mess it up bingles Logan Wilson I know he could play he talked a good game, but he backs it up what it's played to And then Ravens linebacker Patrick Queen was also an honorable mention. So hey both Ravens inside linebackers. They made it, but Anyway, so that is the list but Roquan Smith sitting at number two and Again him being ranked as one of the best inside linebackers in the league Obviously no problem with that but I just I just really want to team keep his cleans help with this one Because again, like I said, I know he can play Know that boy can play. I know he can make plays. I know that he can make people But exactly what is an off ball linebacker? That's what I want somebody to please explain to me in the comments section If you want to hit me up as in a DM about it to that but please explain it to me in a comment section because See this is why I would prefer you explain it in the comment section because it will not only help me understand But I'm sure that may be somebody else out there I'm sure it's probably not many of us because again, y'all know way more than I do But it's probably somebody else out there too. That's like what what what is an off ball linebacker What what is exactly that?  Again, you educate me educate me. Please let let let not well not just me. Let us all know Exactly what it is. I know a lot of y'all exes and old guys I know a lot of y'all have been involved whether you played the game of football On whatever level you played it on some just little league some Peewee some high school some college some pros It's all again teamkeeper clean y'all have done and accomplished so much in your lives That a lot of people don't even know about a lot of people don't even realize Y'all got not only a lot of so much knowledge, but y'all got so much experience, too And that experience it can help us all out and it can help us all understand the game of football that much more So again, people having a conversation about off-ball linebackers.  I love y'all. I appreciate y'all so much. Oh Real quicker, you know stuff crazy you can follow on Twitter course subscribe to the YouTube channel That's the most important subscribe to the YouTube channel tell your notifications on so you do not miss not one single thing Shout out to all the teamkeeper clean patrons. I love y'all appreciate y'all so much shout out to all the teamkeeper clean channel members I love y'all appreciate y'all so much as well. Thank you. Thank you for everybody who supports the channel Thank you for everybody who's been patient with the channel Thank you for everybody who's been sitting in question then just question from subscribers into the channel I've seen him. We ain't doing yet, but I've seen him Thank you. I appreciate y'all. Thank you very very much and thank you for y'all just being crazy with the support You can follow on Twitter You can follow on Instagram You can follow on threads threads is the newest thing right now Even though there's apparently they about to get sued or what you can follow on threads while it's still alive Everything is engraving vids. I appreciate y'all so much. Seriously. I do I really appreciate y'all because the way that y'all show support the way that y'all show extra support You ain't got to do that, but you do it. So I love you for that. Appreciate you and again. I thank you all for educating me on Exactly what an off-ball lineback is and I thank you for everything that you've educated me on just over the years Because like I said before I learned so much from y'all. I learned a whole lot from y'all Because in it just when you get to learn from other people it just takes your your fandom It makes it even more fun Because you can understand a little more here and there and then when you talking about this or that It's just it's just so much better when you understand that much more So I appreciate y'all a lot. Love you. Hope you having a great day and we out


On occasion, a viewer will ask if he can feud with me, and I always respond with a very gentle, no, you're terrible. That all changed last month when I introduced a contest for people to submit their own movie feuds ideas. I poured over at least tens of entries, if not twelves of entries, to determine the top five in this video. You are now going to pick the top one to move on to become a guest feuder with yours truly. What a dream. What a magical experience one person is going to get. Here are the final contestants on movie feuds. We'll leave the top five for making it this far with a single clap. I have posted their videos in the description, so please check those out. Come back here and vote via those YouTube polls, and I cannot stress this enough. If you submitted and didn't win, please don't feel bad. This opportunity will most likely never come up again if that makes you feel better and if that's any condolence to you at all. And the winner is going to move on, as I said, to debate film with a 30-something-year-old douchebag on the internet.  Thanks for watching. Vote and remember, this is more than just reviews. This is Movie Feud.


Lecture 2 TA 101 think and analyze, you know I always try to extract some sense from nonsense. So, you know what this word is you guys are students. So, you would be familiar with this word cheating and I am a teacher. So, I am familiar with this word teaching, now what is common between these two words cheating and teaching. You know if you rearrange the alphabets over here you would essentially get this, you know what this called. So, these two are anagrams of each other, you know. So, if you are on the other side of the table you would probably be indulging in this, while if you are on this side of the table like me I would be indulging in this and my job is to have you guys not do this anyhow. Polygons and conics what would a polygon say to a conic. So, you know this is this I am a movie buff and I was watching this movie Jerry McGuire and you know Jerry McGuire was managing one of the football players one of the upcoming football players. And there like two phrases in that movie which I like very much which I guess you all may also be familiar with. Anyway, so what would a polygon say to a conic show me the bunny in the movie it is like show me the bunny show me the bunny here you go.  So, thumb proves I am sorry, but anyhow. So, basic construction and conics. So, this is what I am going to be covering in this lecture. So, this is the second lecture and the first week introduction basic constructions alright. So, we will be focusing on how to construct a hexagon you know it is in the family of it is a member of the family of polygons. And there are these two methods that we will be discussing vertex to vertex distance method and distance between flats alright. So, given to vertices this one and this one and let us say we are given this distance D between these two vertices how do I construct a hexagon. So, this is what I would do I would divide this line into two equal parts you know I will draw an arc with this center and radius as D over 2 and another arc with this center and radius as D over 2. So, that these two arcs they happen to meet at the midpoint of the line and also tangent to each other. And with this midpoint as center I will draw a full circle of radius D over 2. Essentially this circle is going to be traversing through the end points of the edge. So, focus on this intersection point this one this one and this one. So, and these two in addition. So, six points they will essentially form the vertices of the hexagon alright. So, if you look at this circle and the hexagon. So, this circle happens to be the circumscribing circle of the hexagon second method distance between flats. So, this is the first flat over here this is second flat over here you know this distance D is given to us how do we draw a hexagon I will mark the midpoint of this line segment draw a circle of radius D over 2 with this midpoint as center I will draw a horizontal line. And then I will draw a line which is tangent to the circle. And this line is such that it is making an angle of 60 degrees with the horizontal I will draw another line which is parallel to this line and tangent to the circle. And then I will draw a horizontal line tangent to the circle at the top I will extend this horizontal line below again tangent to the circle at the bottom. And then I will draw this line which is at 120 degrees to the horizontal and a line parallel to this line alright. So, this point over here this point this point this point this point and the sixth point here they will essentially form the vertices of a hexagon. So, you can actually join these vertices and eventually construct a hexagon. So, the way this construction is done the circle happens to be the inscribing circle inscribed within the hexagon vertex to vertex distance distance between flats in this case the parent circle or the main circle happens to be the circumscribing circle in this case the parent on the main circle happens to be the inscribing circle to the hexagon alright. Now, this is something very interesting how do you draw a pentagon. So, given a line segment whose end points are at distance d. So, the end points are marked as a and c. So, with the midpoint of a c line segment as center we draw a circle with various d over 2. And then what we do is we bisect this line segment b c we draw a vertical passing through b intersecting the circle at d. So, once we bisect this line segment b c we get a point over here this market e. Now, notice that we are going to be working with distance d e let us say this is of magnitude r. Now, with this distance and with e s center we are going to be drawing an arc which is going to be cutting the line segment a c at f. Now, this length over here let us say this is capital R with this radius capital R and with let us say point d as center will cut the main circle at this arc or at this point. So, this length over here from here to here is capital R now with this as center and the same radius will cut the main circle again at this point and will continue doing. So, until we get 5 points on the circumference 1 2 3 4 and 5 these 5 points will constitute or will be the vertices of the pentagon we are seeking. Now, think and analyze how is it that you think that this is pentagon is it difficult for you to appreciate or perhaps not. Let us try to prove that this is really a pentagon let me grab a piece of chalk and let me focus on this region over here. So, this is my point b here is my point d d b is half of the diameter of the circle. So, it is d over 2 now this distance is again d over 2 and b e is half of b c. So, b e would be d over 4 and I look at this distance d e let us first try to figure what this distance is. So, this is R and we will have R square by Pythagoras theorem as d square over 4 plus d square over 16 this is equal to by multiplying divide by 4 here 5 d square over 16 implying that R is d over 4 times root of 5. Now, let us try to figure what this distance is capital R. Now, if I go left forward from b I am looking at point f here now by construction. So, with this point e a center what I had done was I had cut the diameter a c with the arc of radius R. So, this distance here would also be R and therefore, f b will be R minus b e which is d over 4.  So, this capital R here d f can also be determined using Pythagoras theorem. So, capital R square equals d square over 4 plus the square of this R minus d over 4 the whole square. Now, let us retain this thing in the square form because we have been needing that. Now, focus on the triangle well let us call this point m m b t. Now, this distance m d is the same as capital R this distance is d over 2 the radius of the circle and this distance is again d over 2 the radius of the circle. So, let me draw this point here somewhere m. So, this distance here is capital R this is d over 2 and m b would again be d over 2 and let me say now that I am interested in trying to find what this angle theta is.  I hope I am doing this right I can substitute this value over here.  Let us substitute this value over here and let us see what we get this is equal to well half plus 2 over d square and this is d over 4 root of 5 minus d over 4 the whole square right and. So, this would be equal to half plus 2.  So, let me write this thing down over here 16 and then this is root of 5 minus 1 the whole square let us see what this is well let me erase this and take this thing up over there. So, this is half plus 1 over 8 and this is 5 plus 1 6 minus 2 root of 5 seems a lock word let us see what takes me half plus 3 over 4 minus root of 5 by 4 this is equal to if I multiply and divide by 2 I have got 5 over 4 minus of root 5 by 4. So, I just realized that I made a mistake here I make a lot of mistakes. So, instead of the positive sign over here I should have really had a negative sign. So, I will go back and correct my mistakes. So, this is a negative sign here because of which this would be negative because of which I guess this would be negative and this would be positive and. So, this actually would be equal to you know 2 minus 3 over 4 plus 1 root of 5 over 4 which is root of 5 minus 1 over 4 and if you go back and try to figure what cosine of 72 degrees is then you would see that this is nothing, but this value here. So, in a sense through geometry construction what we do is we essentially divide the circle into 5 equal to path in such a way ensuring that this angle here theta is equal to 72 degrees this angle. So, once we ensure this it becomes a little easier for us to construct a pentagon again through geometry. So, this was an algebra this was the algebra just to you know support the construction of pentagon, but you would have realized that we did not actually need this algebra and construction of the pentagon. Anyway, so let us move forward. So, these 5 vertices they will essentially be a part of this pentagon. How would you construct an octagon? So, let us say you have a square of equal dimension sides draw two diagonals indicate these vertices from this a center and this length as the radius draw an arc do the same with this a center and the same radius again the same radius with this a center and finally, with this as radius with this a center and the same radius. So, draw these bunch of arcs and wherever these arcs are going to be intersecting the edges. So, here here here here here here here and here you essentially have 8 vertices join them and you will be getting an octagon. So, pretty simple construction I think an analyze you know through algebra or otherwise if this is really an octagon not. How about a regular septagon or any other regular polygon for that matter given a side you know. So, let us say you have given a side you have been given a side all right. So, you have this point over here this distance is known. So, draw a semicircle and divide this semicircle into. So, since we are focusing on septagon. So, divide this semicircle into let us say 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 equal parts and name them in such a way that you let go of this first point on the left. So, start naming them as 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 right and then draw about this happens to be the center of this semicircle over here name that center is a and one of the ends of the semicircle is b. Now, draw radial lines in such a way that they happen to be connecting this point a here and all these points on the semicircle. So, once you are done with that take this as your distance your reference distance you know mark that on your compass with point 7 a center mark an arc on this edge with this point a center with the same radius mark a point on this line segment with this a center same radius mark a point over here and keep going forth until you mark a point over here. And then once you have gotten all these points vertex 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7. So, these are the 7 vertices that will essentially constitute your septic. So, this is a generic method that allows you to draw any regular polygon construction of an ellipse by means of concentric circles. So, you got this larger circle you have got this smaller circle they happen to be concentric same center divide both circles into equal number of parts. So, I believe I would have divided the outer circle as or into 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 equal number of parts and likewise the inner circle also into 16 equal parts. Now, this is what the trick is from one of these points draw horizontal from one of these points corresponding points draw vertical or vice versa let us see. So, I draw horizontal from the inner circle and vertical from the outer circle corresponding points over here horizontal vertical horizontal vertical horizontal vertical horizontal from the inner vertical from the outer horizontal vertical horizontal vertical you know horizontal. And these points they essentially will be lying on an ellipse I could do the other way round for example, instead of drawing the horizontal from the inner circle I would be drawing the horizontal from the outer circle. Well this is the construction of the ellipse for the first case as I said I will be drawing the horizontal from the outer circle and vertical from the inner circle inner circle this time. So, horizontal vertical vertical horizontal vertical vertical horizontal vertical horizontal vertical horizontal vertical horizontal and thus I will essentially be getting these points and they will happen to fly on an ellipse which essentially will be you know oriented 90 degrees. So, these are the points on the ellipse and I will join these points and get another ellipse. Now, the question think and analyze for you is this or this an exact ellipse or not let us try to find it out. So, let us join the corresponding points on the inner and outer circle have this horizontal have this line segment over here let this angle be theta. So, let this point p or rather let this point be p and the coordinates of p would be b cosine of theta and b sin of theta where b is the center of b is the radius of the inner circle likewise point over here q will have coordinates a cosine of theta a sin of theta where a is the radius of the outer circle. And if you focus on this point what would be the x coordinate of this point and what would be the y coordinate of this point you guess you have these values over here. So, the x coordinate of this point essentially will be the x coordinate of q and the y coordinate of this point would be e y coordinate of the coordinate of p. So, essentially if this point is represented as x and y then x will be a cosine of theta while b p sin of theta and of course, if you go back to your 11th grade or 12th grade coordinate geometry you would readily confirm that x y is nothing but a point on the ellipse. And therefore, this ellipse is an exact ellipse yeah alright. So, if I want to draw a tangent or a normal at any point on the ellipse what do I do let us say I have this point here I would like to draw a tangent or a normal at this point p. Now, what I will be doing is I will be using one of the properties of the ellipse first I will try to figure the focal or the two fork high. Now, let me go back let me draw the horizontal and let me also draw the vertical I will set at this point let us say and I would also I would rather already know the length of the major axis of the ellipse I will take half of that distance with this as center I will draw two walks over here and here this point being m I will mark a point over here. So, this distance is half the major axis and I will also mark a point on the other side of the major axis. So, these two circles would represent the two fork high of the ellipse and the property I am using is straight forward. So, if I take any point on the ellipse so the distance of this point from this center and this center if I sum these two distances that sum will always be equal to the length of the major axis. So, two fork high f and g and this is the property I just had mentioned.   And this line over here essentially will be the normal at point p all I need to do is you know using a compass or using a ruler I have to bisect this angle this angle is 180 degrees I have to bisect it and I will do exactly the same thing you know bisect the angle. Once I do that this line segment here will be the tangent to the ellipse normal to the ellipse n and tangent to the ellipse. Now think and analyze T a y is the n you know this line segment normal to the ellipse construction of ellipse by intersecting arcs again I will use the same property I had discussed before. So, if I have a point m on the ellipse and if I have these two fork high of the ellipse well this is not these are not the fork high, but they happen to be the points at the extreme ends of the semi or of the major axis. So, if the length of the major axis is 2 a if the length of the minor axis is 2 b should be this way I guess never mind. So, the property is any point well let me see if f and g are 2 fork high and if t is any point on the ellipse then f t plus t g has to be equal to 2 a alright. So, what I will do is I will divide 2 into equal number of parts let us say the entire length this length over here which is given to me into equal number of parts. Let me mark the extreme points on the ellipse as p and q there I go well and then what I would do is if I choose let us say this length and draw an arc with center f and this length then I will have to choose this length for the radius of the other arc that I am going to be drawing with g as center that would be my point one of my points t on the ellipse and I will do that you know for as many points as possible once again. So, if I choose you know any other point over here let us say this one if I choose this length with this length as radius and this a center I will draw another arc and with this as the radius and center as g I will draw the second arc the intersection these 2 arcs will give me another point. So, I will keep getting these points and that would essentially help me draw the ellipse straight forward think and analyze what is the maximum radius of the arcs possible from point f or g why you think always a good idea to think let us do a little bit of algebra choose any point t over here let us mark f t as distance d 1 and let us mark g t as distance d 2 let the coordinates of t b x and y and it. So, happens that point t is a result of this property that t 1 plus t 2 has to be equal to the length of the major axis of the ellipse 2 l and essentially d 1 plus d 2 is a constant because 2 l is constant for a given ellipse. Now you know for a simple case if I choose g such that it has coordinates a 0 then f would be such that it would have coordinates minus a 0 with this point as center and if I do a little bit of algebra. So, d 1 essentially would be you know x plus a the whole squared plus y square and d 2 will essentially be x minus a the whole squared plus y square and that is equal to constant and with a little bit of algebra I will get this equation x squared over c squared over 4 plus y squared over c squared minus 4 a squared the entire thing over 4 is equal to 1 and it. So, happens that if you choose you know if you represent this as you know some a 1 if you represent this as some b 1 it is like x squared over a 1 squared plus y squared over b 1 squared is equal to 1 which is the equation of an ellipse. So, apparently this happens to be an exact ellipse and precisely. So, if this constant c is greater than or equal to 2 times a I think yeah alright. So, you can use the same property let me go back you can use the same property have a pin here at one of the 4 pi have another pin here at the second focus and you know you can have a loop of string. So, this distance and this distance making sure that the sum of these two distances is a constant you can draw an ellipse. of our committees another way of constructing an ellipse alright. So, let us say you have two line segments m and n well. So, you have this length equals 2 a you know have two points red and green and have this entire ruler place on the vertical with the same two points red and green and start moving this ruler in such a way that the green is always on the horizontal and the red is always on the vertical. And let me go back see what is happening focus in this point green always on the horizontal red always on the vertical you know this point is actually leaving some traces out over here and these traces are nothing but points which are going to be lying on the ellipse. So, you can do the algebra and figure that this also kind of gives an exact ellipse let me skip this algebra well let me go back and let me try to work out the algebra for you alright. So, for any position of this line you will have this as distance y you will have this as distance x join point r with the vertical over here.  So, do not trust me work this algebra out by yourself you will realize that I may have made a mistake construction of ellipse the parallel gram method given a parallel gram how do you construct an ellipse how do you construct an ellipse well divide this parallel gram into a bunch of parts at the top I guess 8 parts here you know like. So, and also well, but before that mark these points 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and also divide this side of the parallel gram into those many equal number parts now watch out for the way I am numbering them and numbering these points from here 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and over here is going to be slightly different it is going to be from here to here. So, once out that then I will have 1 reference point over here and the other reference point over there and watch out for the line segments I am constructing well. In fact, I can have the same points on this side watch out for the line segments I am constructing. So, I would imagine that this point in this point essentially will be lying on the ellipse with this as reference I will have my line segment pass through point 1 with this as reference I will have my line segment pass through point 1 this is a point on the ellipse intersection of this line segment and this line segment from here I will have a line segment pass through this point 2 and from here I will have my line segment pass through this point 2 here. So, the intersection of this line segment and this line segment over here will give me another point on the ellipse. So, it is always a good idea for you to you know have some reference associated with the points or the geometric entities that you are using for construction. For example, from here I draw a line segment passing through 3 from here I am going to be having a line segment passing through this point 3 here intersection of these 2 line segments will be a point on the ellipse and I will continue like. So, I can do the same thing and on this side of the diagram once a word just follow the construction and what I can do is I could mirror these sets of points over there mirror this set of points over here and once I have these points essentially all these points they happen to be lying on the ellipse. Now, you try to figure if this is an exact or an approximate ellipse also is it possible for you to identify the conjugate diameters try to figure it out construction of ellipse another method by means of conjugate diameters. So, given to conjugate diameters let me name them as a b and c d the insect at point o a b and c d are conjugate diameters let us say o is the center of the ellipse.  Let me join point d and q let me divide this outer circle into say equal number of parts let me also join point c with the n point over here. Now, you would see that I am using line segments with different colors just to indicate that they are parallel. So, this line segment is parallel with this line segment now watch out what I am going to be doing with these points be careful. Now, I am going to be drawing a line which is parallel to this line here o q and likewise over here again I am depicting these lines using color blue just to emphasize that these lines are parallel. Now, from here I am going to be drawing a line parallel to c d and with one of the points over here I am going to be drawing a line segment parallel to d q and likewise from here as well I am going to be lying rather I am going to be drawing a line segment I am not lying I am going to be drawing a line segment parallel to d q from here. So, of course, this point and this point theoretically will be a part of the ellipse likewise I will draw a line segment parallel to c d such that it passes through the intersection between this blue line and the line a b from here I will draw a line parallel to o d from here I will draw a line parallel to again o d and of course, this red line this red line over here they would be intersecting with the purple line. So, these two points again will be belonging to the ellipse that I am seeking. So, once again point here here intersection between the purples and the reds will essentially give me points on the ellipse intersection between the purples and reds. So, this is how I draw an ellipse using conjugate diameters is this an exact ellipse go figure all right one of the final methods of constructing an ellipse the four center method. So, given a rohambus once again given a rohambus these four lengths are the same just that the angles are not 90 degrees otherwise the problem is square identify the centers of each of the line segments. Now, the first thing you would want to do is identify and draw the longest diagonal. So, of course, this one is not the longest diagonal, but the other one which is the longest diagonal. Now, look at this point go to the opposite vertex join this point with this vertex and likewise look at this point look at the opposite vertex join this point with this vertex. So, you will essentially have this as one of the centers this as one of the centers and two more centers. So, let me call the center as C 1 with C 1 as center and this is radius to an arc of course, this arc is going to be having these two points lying on it with this point as center and this as radius draw another arc that will be having these two midpoints of the respective edges of the rohambus on it the third center or rather the fourth center would be here the third center would be here. So, with this as center this as radius draw the third arc and with C 3 as center and this is radius draw the fourth arc looks like an ellipse, but is this an exact ellipse I will give you a clue. Well, if you think about this this is an actually this is actually an arc think about this this also is an arc rather or likewise these two are also arcs. So, of course, I mean this cannot be an exact ellipse it has to be approximate again. So, to be able to construct an ellipse using the four center method step one identify the longest diagonal, but before that make sure you look at the midpoints of the four sides of the rohambus. Now, there would be a vertex on this side of the longest diagonal and on this side of the longest diagonal. So, one vertex over here one vertex over here identify those vertices and join the corresponding vertices with the corresponding midpoints of the edges of the rohambus. So, from here to here and then from here to here. So, you will essentially have four centers center C 1 center C 2 center C 3 and center C 4 and follow the procedure as I said this is or this has to be an approximate ellipse because all these four geometric entities are arcs they cannot be a part of the ellipse and of course, this as I said the clue you have to identify the longest diagonal first, but this method works only with rohambus it does not work with pylograms for example. So, for example, if this length and this length you know they have to be the same and if they are different from these two lengths then this method will not work. Incidentally this arc has to be tangent to these two line segments this part it has to be tangent to these two line segments and that would not be the case for any generic pylogram construction of a parabola all right. So, given one line segment divide that into equal number of paths let us say 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 another line segment divide them also into equal number of paths just make sure that you follow the numbering. So, for this line segment I am now numbering from this point over here which is the intersection between this line segment and this line segment for the other line segment I am numbering the other way around. So, I am starting from one of the end points of this lines and join 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 keep going and try to figure an arc that is tangent to all these line segments once you get that. So, it is this green curve which is the parabola that you are seeking keep thinking and analyzing until next time.


FNN, headline news update. I'm Ron Baselchappen here at noon for the TFNN update, and I am the host of the Tiger Traditions Hour coming up after this update, and the author of the opening called Daily Newsletter. Dali is at 28,318. So far it hasn't taken out the 28,337 high of yesterday, but the Magdi finally crossed positive. Socastics at 86, all of that is very positive, plus you had an item reversal back on the third, it was the next day, that was the fifth, the fourth. The fourth of December, and then you had another one three days later, and we haven't filled that. So that says there is upside momentum thrust, and it's now testing the weekly resistance, and so far all systems are go, at least in the short term, for higher prices. The S&P at this moment has made an all-time high. It's high today, so far it's 31 at 98.22, fractionally higher than yesterday. It's only a laying B, and this is a good sign. It suggests that over the next week and a half or so, we should have higher prices eventually getting to a D, and we'll see if that D is some kind of a top. Eight-time back in the rest, QQQ, same thing, leg B, all-time high, at 209.29 today should have been a day of rest off the spectacular moves in the last couple of days. Not yet, and the IWM, here we go, it was underneath the high from the four days ago of 164.81, but it's only at 164.11, I mean, it's right in the range, hasn't broken down yet, and the technicals are not as good as the other indices, but they are still pretty good. And gold, gold is up, fractionally, gold is up, no, now it's down. Down a half a point at 1480, stuck in that range, hit the 50-period, this grey line, the 50-period moving average, and the daily weekly suggests there's a whole bunch of moving averages here, and that's the weekly, and that rectangle formation just keeps going on. I suspect gold is just having a well-earned rest of the spectacular move, going from almost 1,100 to the 1573 level, so I think that it deserves a bit of a breather off the momentous move earlier in the year. The dollar is only quite nice, it's up 12 cents at 97.18, but the chart itself makes that arch formation, I'll talk about the arch formation when we get back, because we want to look at it in some of the like Boeing, made a beautiful arch, we'll talk about that in a few minutes, but I do my Tiger Technicians hour, otherwise see you tomorrow, make your way in a few minutes and do my shape.


Hello everyone! The Force Asia Summit is an annual event that brings together developers, tech communities, and companies from around the world to showcase their latest developments in open-source technologies. This year's event will take place online from the 7th to 9th of April covering a wide range of topics, cloud infrastructure and services, continuous delivery, databases, open hardware, AI, robotics, security, and open-source solutions to tackle global issues. Hi everyone! This is Padmas. I'm a maintainer of the Fokker Science Lab project. Currently I'm doing a PhD in Sweden and my research area is in-body sensor networks. I'm going to speak about open-source hardware in education. Namaste! I am Pognage, software developer from India. I am working on an event here project. I'm looking forward to meeting other developers, tech enthusiasts, and our event users in the Force Asia Summit 2022. See you all! Hi! This is Tika, the community organizer of OpenStack Indonesia. I'm very passionate about open-source software and I'm very excited to meet other Force enthusiasts at the Summit. Hola! I'm Monko here from Madrid in Spain. I'm a software engineer in robotics and I'm running the robotics track this year at the Force Asia Summit. I hope to see you all there! Hello everyone! This is Razry Wong from Sanxon, China. Force Asia is really a great place for web developers like myself to meet and talk about the latest web technologies. Hello everyone! I am Wi Bai. I'm an ASKU student in Vietnam. I'm very interested in technology. So I'm here for this event to learn more about open-source development and how I can get myself started in computer science. Hello! I'm Young Bishan, a software engineer from South Korea and organizer of Open to Korea. I'm looking forward to the cloud and demo track and connecting the open-source contributors around the world on upcoming Force Asia. Xin chào! My name is Huong. I'm a pharmacist. I'm attending the Force Asia Summit to learn about open-source applications that address global health issues and how the open-source community is responding to the corona pandemic. Hello! My name is Michael and I'm from the United States. Free and open-source software has a kind of special power that can bring people together from around the world to collaborate on technology that you can use in your own community to make the world a better place. If you're like me and excited about technology and all the cool stuff it can do, then you should join us for the next Force Asia Summit.


Hello, this video is the first in a series, or 2018, on just looking over certain programs I like and I use regularly. Now, my desktop setup is not like most people's. I actually recently switched from XFCE to Flux Boxer. I've always loved Flux Boxer, it's a very lightweight interface. And I've actually disabled all the toolbars for all the programs and the window borders, and I have everything automatically go full screen. And the way I do this is a program called Maximus, which we're going to look at today. And I've currently disabled it, but usually it starts on my computer when the desktop starts up. So here's an example. I'm going to open up a few programs here like this Task Manager and Agave, and how about some Solitaire. And you can see they open up windows. As I said, I've removed the title bars from all of them and the window borders. And I usually just use the ALT's left click to drag them around if I need to, which is a default on most Linux desktops. But let me go ahead and I'm going to ALT 4 to close each one. I'm going to start up Maximus now. You don't have to install this. You can use apt aptitude, aptget, whatever, so it would be sudo apt install maximus. Like so. I already have it installed. So I'm going to start it up. And once you start it up, it will automatically make all windows you have open full screen. And now anytime you open up a program, they're going to open up full screen. So I'll open up Solitaire and you can see it goes full screen. I can open up my Task Manager and it goes full screen. And I can open up what was Solitaire, right, or Solitaire I already have open, Agave. And that opens up full screen. So I like everything full screen. But then sometimes, you know, I don't want to look at everything full screen necessarily. Some programs look funny full screen. So for example, let's say I didn't want this full screen. I have keys set up for myself so I can hit shift in the windows key and up and it unmaximizes if I hit it again. So I can unmaximize that and I can move it to another windows. Like if I do this, it's now on my other display here. So I can just do Alt and Windows left to right. So that's just my kind of setup. But I have everything go full screen by default because for the most part I have two screens. I'm not going to be looking at two programs more than once. But occasionally you do. So I have keys set up to tile everything. And yeah, I probably should use a window manager such as Awesome, which is Tiling Window Manager, which I really, really want to get into one of these days. I just didn't really have time. I want to say I didn't have time to learn it, but I spent a lot of time setting up FluxBox like this so that I can move around like this. But the main point of this video today was to tell you about this Maxims program. If you are unfamiliar with it, it makes most programs open up full screen. Every once in a while you get a program that doesn't want to open up full screen. And I think usually it's like a Java program that isn't using standard interfaces. So that's it, the Maximus command. So once you install it, once it's running, so you can add to your startup applications, every program you run runs full screen. This comes in very useful. If you're running this on some sort of tablet, like maybe you have a Raspberry Pi with a small screen or you have some sort of tablet that's running Xorg on it.  Like if you're working on an Android device, something most of the time, not all the time, most of the time, you want things to go full screen. That's what Maximus is for. Install it, start it up, and you're good to go. Thanks for watching. I hope you find this program useful. I hope you find this video useful. Please visit FilmsByChris.com. That's Chris at the K. There's a link in the description. That's my website in there. You can search through all my videos from both my channels and also go to the sports section where you can support me, which I really do appreciate. You can support me through PayPal or you can support me through patreon.patreon.com. There's also a link to that in the description of the video. Really appreciate it. Even a dollar a month. Enough of you. That would be awesome. So I thank you for watching and as always, I hope that you have a great day.


Every single week we do the great search. Brought you by Digikey. Thank you Digikey for supporting our show. Yay, thank you. And, uh, Lady Aida, what are you looking for this week on the Great Search? Okay, so, um, back to my computer. We are looking to use this chip, the Coral Accelerator Module, and, uh, Machine Learning Accelerator Chip. I want to make a breakout for it and maybe start, maybe, you know, implementing stuff for Raspberry Pi on it. I think that would be cool. It, however, has really, um, let's see, I have to find the location where it is. It has pretty serious power supply requirements. Um, if you go down to our on-sequence power network, power delivery network design, it can, it normally drives, it normally draws about 500 milliamps, but it can spike up to three amps, uh, very quickly, which means, first of all, we're going to need big-ass capacitors. Okay, so let me, let me get the gigantic capacitors, um, next week on the Great Search. But for now, I want to get some sort of buck regulator because I want to power as well as USB. I want something that'll convert to about 4.5 to 5.5, down to 3.3 at, like, 3 plus amps, which is, like, not a small amount of current.   And you can do it this way. Um, you can go to, you know, DC-DC regulators, and you can search for them, but I'll say that there's actually almost, like, too many options. Like, power supplies are, if it's a linear regulator, it's pretty easy, but if it's a buck converter, um, the problem is there's, there's, like, there's chips that can do buck and boost, um, there's ones that have fixed or adjustable voltages, and it can get actually a little challenging because, also, you know, you want the current output, but sometimes it's, like, the switch current and, like, the frequency. I actually don't end up usually, for power regulators like this, this is one of the few things that actually don't go straight to Digikey, which is weird because you're like, why am I watching the great search if you're not actually going to search on Digikey? What happens is I search at, you know, I look to see what kind of company makes the parts I'm looking for, and then I look on their site because they're just going to be much better at, um, like, for example, you have to deal with, like, things like, you know, thermal management and efficiency, and you're going to be able to get much more specific searches on those sites for this specific type of problem. I'll say the same thing for microcontroller. Power supply managers and microcontrollers are the two things where I usually go to the manufacturer page, and then I bounce back to Digikey to find, like, what's in stock and what's available, and I kind of go between the two. So, um, I happen to, like, TI buck converters. I do make a ton of them. Another thing is I had to say, I'm very picky. I actually kind of like the latest converters. I know that there's, like, you know, the oldies and goodies, the LM, like, 76s or whatever, but I really like to have kind of the latest. So what I end up doing is I end up going to TI's website, and if you buy samples from TI, by the way, they ship to Digikey, and then here I go through to products and power management. And again, I don't do this for everything, but I do do this for some boost and buck converters, especially ones where I'm very specific about, I need, like, very high current or very specific voltage or very specific requirements, not just like, oh, generic, you know, I just need, like, 100 milliamps of 5 volts. You can get that anywhere. But 3 to 4 amps from 3 volts is actually tougher. So I'm going to look for buck regulators, and I don't want ones with the integrated inductor. I'm not super into those yet. They're cool, but I'm not quite ready. I don't know. Maybe next year I'll be ready for those. I like to have the separate inductor. So they have a couple different options. They have a controller. These are where you have external MOSFETs. This is great for extraordinarily high currents, extremely high voltages, like really, like, weird messed up situations that I don't usually deal with. For most things, I just want a converter. I want it to regulate it. It has a built-in MOSFETs. I just give it a capacitor inductor. I'm good to go. Most people make you happy. And this is what I really like. It's like, they have this very nice search system, like the Quick Search, where I just kind of give it approximately what I want, and it will give me options. And it will kind of winnow through all, like, you know, there's like 100 different buck converters. So for USB, you know, basically the voltage can be as little as 4 volts. I know 4.5 is the specification. But, you know, if I'm pulling a lot of current, I want it to be able to run down at 4 volts. The max is going to be 5.5. I want 3.3 volt output. And I want 3.5 amps. And you're like, wait a minute, you know, the data sheets hit 3 amps. I know, but I like to give it always like 10%, 15% extra. It seems like a wise idea. So, and I don't care about the quiescent, because this is in battery power. This thing is going to be plugged into the wall. So, who cares about the quiescent? No problem. And you can see that there's more. You know, you can do the little draggy drops and change this around if you want. I can adjust the current maximum and the duty cycle requirements. You know, I don't really care about the safety category. For the package groups, you know, I don't want BGAs, but I don't think I need to mess with this yet. For rating, I don't need automotive. Usually there's an automotive version and a catalog version. You know, I'll just cut it in half by only looking at those. And then, so, you know, now you only have a couple options. Which is really nice. I like that. There's not a lot of things I have to worry about. There's only a couple options. And you can look at the packages, you know, to see and get an idea of, like, some of these are kind of big, they're HTTops and I don't really want those. But, you know, the top one is kind of nifty. I mean, first off, it's inexpensive. It runs at a kind of a mind-boggling 2.4 megahertz, which is, you know, nothing for a Mac controller, but for a converter, it's quite high. And it's only six pins.  Smaller the better. But there's a couple other good options. There's the TPS62095. I've used the TPS62 series quite a bit. It's a lovely little series. So I can check out all these, but let's maybe start with this one.  I actually haven't used this before. But you can, like, do simulations and stuff. You can check out the datasheet. Let me open up the datasheet. And, yeah, so it's a series that's available in different currents. So it's actually kind of nice. I like that.  You'll have to have more capacitance, of course, and a different size inductor. But for the most part, you can pick which one you like. And this seems nice and simple, right? You know, you just need an inductor, a couple capacitors. The thing is, you know, you're not going to get great efficiency at 4 amp current. But let's see, you know, VL 3.3 from VIN. Okay, like, you know, 90% just not bad. I think this is pretty good. So this might be a good option. And then what I do is once I find this, I take the beginning part of the part number because you can see it's a series. The X means it's like, you know, it's one, two, three, four for like one, two, three, four amps. I go here and then I just type it in. And I can see what the options are. So there's actually a couple of things. There's a new, there's some new dev boards. So they do have it a valve board. You know, I usually don't get a valve boards, but for power supplies, I sometimes do because power supply layout, you really, you know, you can look at the Gerbers, but sometimes having it is very handy. You can really see if you're able. I've designed power supplies and, you know, not had like two ounce copper, not had four layer PCBs. And I haven't quite gotten the current output that I was expecting. And sometimes getting the valve board helps me determine is it the chip or is it my layout? Is it like my capacitor inductor or is it, you know, what is it that is keeping me from getting what I think I should be getting out of the power supply? So I'll probably pick up one of these valve boards, 60 bucks, you know, it's not bad. And then over here, I've got the regulators and it looks like there's a couple options fixed and then this is the full series. So this is the one that I want. I think this one is the four amp version. So they have a couple in stock. And yeah, you know, when you get to a taping wheel, they're 88 cents, which is a good deal, you know, with the inductors, you know, the inductors, like maybe, you know, a dollar capacitor for, sorry, a dollar for the capacitor inductors. The whole power supply is maybe two bucks. It's active. You know, you can download, it looks like they have a CAD model even so I can get started instantly. And I like that it's just small, you know, like it's small. I don't need a special heat sinking. I'll just check the datasheet to make sure that I can, I can use this on a two layer board and I'll plug this next to the core module and I'll try it out.  And first off, see if I can get into performance and then use my oscilloscope to make sure that my 3.3 volt line is nice and steady. So that's the next step for this design. So I'm very excited. The TPS62-827. Okay, and that's this week's... The buck converter of the week. Great search for Digikey.


Good morning everyone, welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of Snowflake Summit 22 live from Caesars Forum in Las Vegas. Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante. This is day three of our coverage. We've had an amazing, amazing time, great conversations talking with Snowflake executives, partners, customers. We're going to be digging into data mesh with data.world. Please welcome John Loyans, the Chief Product Officer. Great to have you on the program, John. Thank you so much for having me here.  So many great people, such a good time. Really, really nice to be back in person with folks. It is fabulous to be back in person. The fact that we're on day four for them, and this is the solution so-case, is as packed as it is at 11 in the morning, is saying something. People were chomping up the bit to hear what they're doing and innovate. Absolutely, usually those last days of conferences, everybody starts getting a little tired, but we're not seeing that at all here. Especially in Vegas, this is impressive. Talk to the audience a little bit about data.world, what you guys do, and talk about the Snowflake relationship. Absolutely, data.world is the only true cloud-native enterprise data catalog. We've been an incredible Snowflake partner, and Snowflake's been an incredible partner to us. Really, since 2018, when we became the first data catalog in the Snowflake Partner Connect experience. Snowflake and the data cloud make it so possible, and it's changed so much in terms of being able to very easily transition data into the cloud to break down those silos, and to have a platform that enables folks to be incredibly agile with data from an engineering and infrastructure standpoint. Data.world is able to provide a layer of discovery and governance that matches that agility and the ability for a lot of different stakeholders to really participate in the process of data management and data governance. So, Data Mesh, basically, Jermak Dagoni lays out the, first of all, the fault domains of existing data and big data initiatives, and she boils it down to the fact that it's just this monolithic architecture with hyper-specialized teams that you have to go through, and it slows everything down, and it doesn't scale, they don't have domain context, so she came up with four principles, if I may. Domain ownership, so push it out to the businesses, they have the context, they should own the data. The second is data as product, we're certainly hearing a lot about that this week. The third is that, so that makes sounds good, push out the data, great, but it creates two problems. Self-serve infrastructure, okay, but her premise is infrastructure should be an operational detail, and then the fourth is computational governance. So, you talked about data, where do you fit in those four principles? You know, honestly, we are able to help teams realize the Data Mesh architecture, and we know that Data Mesh is really, it's both a process and a culture change, but then, when you want to enact a process and a culture change like this, you also need to select the appropriate tools to match the culture that you're trying to build, the process and the architecture that you're trying to build, and the data.world data catalog can really help along all four of those axes. When you start thinking first about, let's say, let's take the first one, data as a product, right? We, even like a very meta of us from metadata management platform at the end of the day, the very meta of us, when you talk about data as a product, we track adoption and usage of all your data assets within your organization and provide program teams and offices of the CDO with incredible event analytics, very detailed, that gives them the right audit trail that enables them to direct very scarce data engineering, data architecture resources to make sure that their data assets are getting adopted and used properly. On the domain driven side, we are entirely knowledge graph and open standards based enabling those different domains. We have incredible joint Snowflake customers like ProLogists and we chatted a lot about this in our session here yesterday, where because of our knowledge graph underpinnings, because of the flexibility of our metadata model, it enables those domains to actually model their assets uniquely from group to group without having to relaunch or run different environments. Like you can do that all within one data catalog platform without having to have separate environments for each of those domains. Federated governance, again, the amount of data exhaust that we create that really enables ambient governance and participatory governance as well. We call it agile data governance, really the adoption of agile and open principles applied to governance to make it more inclusive and transparent and we provide that in a way that can federate across those domains and make it consistent. Okay, so you facilitate across that whole spectrum of principles and so in the early examples of data mesh that I've studied and actually collaborated with, like with JPMC who I don't think is, who's not using your data catalog, hello, fresh, you may or may not be, but I mean there are numbers and I want to get to that. But what they've done is they've enabled the domains to spin up their own, whatever, data lakes, data warehouses, data hubs, at least in concept, most of them are data lakes on AWS, but still in concept they want to be inclusive and they've created a master data catalog and then each domain has a sub-catalog which feeds into the master and that's how they get consistency and governance and everything else. Is that the right way to think about it? Do you have a different spin on that? Yeah, I have a slightly different spin on it. I think organizationally it's the right way to think about it and in absence of a catalog that can truly have multiple federated metadata models, multiple graphs in one platform, that is really kind of the only way to do it. With Data.World you don't have to do that. You can have one platform, one environment, one instance of Data.World that spans all of your domains, enable them to operate independently and then federate across them. So you just answered my question as to why I should use Data.World versus Amazon Glue. Oh, absolutely. I mean, that's awesome that you've done now. How have you done that? What's your secret sauce? The secret sauce there is really, in all credit to our CTO, one of my closest friends who was a true student of knowledge graph practices and principles and really felt that the right way to manage metadata and knowledge about the data analytics ecosystem that companies were building was through federated linked data, right? So we use standards and we've built an open and extensible metadata model that we call COS that really takes the best parts of existing open standards in the semantic space, things like schema.org, dcat, Dublin Core brings them together and models out the most typical enterprise data assets, providing you with an ontology that's ready to go. But because of the graph nature of what we do is instantly accessible without having to rebuild environments, without having to do a lot of management against it. It's really quite something and it's something all of our customers are very impressed with and are getting a lot of leverage out of it. And we have a lot of time today so we're not going to short change this topic.  This is an open standard, it's not open source. No, it's an open standard. Built on open standards. We also fundamentally believe in extensibility and openness. We do not want to vertically lock you into our platform. So everything we have is API driven API available. Your metadata belongs to you if you need to export your graph instantly available in open machine readable formats. That's really, we come from the open data community. That was a lot of the founding of data.world. We've worked a lot with the open data community and we fundamentally believe in that. And that's enabled a lot of our customers as well to truly take data.world and not have it be a data catalog application but really an entire metadata management platform and extend it even further into their enterprise to really catalog all of their assets but also to build incredible integrations to things like corporate search. Having data assets show up in corporate wiki search along with all the descriptive metadata that people need has been incredibly powerful and an incredible extension of our platform that I'm so happy to see our customers in need to be doing. So it's not exclusive to Snowflake. It's not exclusive to AWS. You can bring it anywhere of Azure, GCP, anything. Yeah, you know, where we are, where we love Snowflake, look, we're at the Snowflake summit and we've always had a great relationship with Snowflake though I'm really leaned in there because we really believe Snowflake's principles particularly around cloud and being cloud native and the operating advantages that it affords companies that's really aligned with what we do. And so Snowflake was really the first of the cloud data catalogs that we ultimately or say the first cloud data warehouses that we integrated with and to see them transition to building really out the data cloud has been awesome. Talk about how data.world and stuff like enable companies like Prologis to be data companies these days, every company has to be a data company but they have to be able to do so quickly to be competitive and to really win. How do you help them if we like up level the conversation to really impacting the overall business? That's a great question, especially right now, everybody knows and Prologis is a great example. They're a logistics and supply chain company at the end of the day and we know how important logistics and supply chain is nowadays. And for them and for a lot of our customers, I think one of the advantages of having a data catalog is the ability to build trust, transparency and inclusivity into their data analytics practice. By adopting agile principles, by adopting a data mesh, you're able to extend your data analytics practice to a much broader set of stakeholders and to involve them in the process while the work is getting done. One of the greatest things about agile software development when it became a thing in the early 2000s was how inclusive it was and that inclusivity led to a much faster ROI on software projects. And we see the same thing happening in data analytics. People, you know, we have amazing data scientists and data analysts coming up with these insights that could be business changing, that could make their company significantly more resilient, especially in the face of economic uncertainty. But if you have to sit there and argue with your business stakeholders about the validity of the data, about the techniques that were used to do the analysis and it takes you three months to get people to trust what you've done, that opportunity's passed. So how do we shorten those cycles? How do we bring them closer? And that's really a huge benefit that like prologists has realized just tightening that cycle time, building trust, building inclusion and making sure ultimately humans learn by doing. And if you can be inclusive, it even increases things like that we all want to help because Lord knows that the world needs it, things like data literacy, right? So data.world can inform me as to where on the spectrum of data quality my data set lives so I can say, okay, this is usable, shareable, gold standard versus fix this. Okay. And you could do that with one data catalog, not a bunch of, yeah. And trust is really a multifaceted and multi-angle idea, right? It's not just necessarily data quality or data observability. We have incredible partnerships in that space like our partnership with Monte Carlo where we can ingest all their amazing observability information and display that in a really consumable way in our data catalog. But it also includes things like the lineage, who touched it, who was involved in the process of it? Can I get a question answered quickly about this data? What's it been used for previously and do I understand that? It's so multifaceted that you have to be able to really model and present that in a way that's unique to any given organization, even unique within domains, within a single organization.  Right, exactly. Exactly. And you just raised a series C, 15 million. We did, yeah. We're really lucky to have incredible investors like Goldman Sachs who led our series C. It really, I think communicates the trust that they have in our vision and what we're doing and the impact that we can have on organizations' ability to be agile and resilient around data analytics. Enabling customers to have that single source of truth is so critical, you talked about trust. That is no joke. Absolutely. That is critical and there's a tremendous amount of business impact, positive business impact that can come from that. What are some of the things that are next for data.world that we're going to see? Oh, you know, I love this. We have such an incredibly innovative team that's so dedicated to this space and the mission of what we're doing. We're out there trying to fundamentally change how people get data analytics work done together. One of the big reasons I founded the company is I really truly believe that data analytics needs to be a team sport. It needs to go from single player mode to team mode and everything that we've worked on in the last six years has leaned into that. Our architecture, being cloud native, we've done over a thousand releases a year that nobody has to manage. You don't have to worry about upgrading your environment. It's a lot of the same story that's made Snowflake so great. We are really excited to have announced and March in our own summit and we're rolling this suite of features out over the course of the year. A new package of features that we call data.world Eureka, which is a suite of automations and knowledge driven functionality that really helps you leverage a knowledge graph to make decisions faster and to operationalize your data in the data ops way. With significantly less effort. Big, big impact there. John, thank you so much for joining Dave and me unpacking what data.world is doing, the data mesh, the opportunities that you're giving to customers in every industry. We appreciate your time and congratulations on the news and the funding. Yeah, thank you. It's been a true pleasure. Thank you for having me on. And I hope you guys enjoy the rest of the day and your other guests that you have. Thank you, we will. All right, for our guests and Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's third day of coverage of Snowflake Summit 22 live from Vegas. Dave and I will be right back with our next guest. So stick around.