Welcome in! Welcome in! We are on the clock. I am Joel Klatt, Fox Sports Draft Analyst, and I am happy to have you. Thank you for joining me here. We're going to get all things draft today covered. I've got my new mock draft that we're going to go through the top 10 picks. I'm going to outline the top 10 picks, including a trade that I have proposed in my latest mock draft. I'm going to talk about Josh Allen and Free Agency, how one affects the other, as well as a pure player evaluation of Josh Allen, the quarterback from Wyoming. And then we'll get to some of your tweets a little bit later in the show. And specifically, I might have a little response to a couple of them in a, I don't know, maybe spirited tone. We'll get to that a little bit later. But for now, let's get to mock 4.0 on the website right now, foxsports.com, here are my top 10 picks. All right, so for the top 10 this week and in the 4.0, there's a lot of change up. And the reason is, is because there's two factors with the giants that could lead them to take a quarterback and could lead them to take Josh Allen. So, because of that, all of a sudden some pieces started to fall. And from the 3.0 to the 4.0, there was a lot of change up in the top 10. So let's get after it right now. With the number one pick in the NFL draft, I project Sam Darnold to the Cleveland Browns. That's been consistent for me in each and every mock draft. And it will be consistent all the way up until we actually do this thing in Dallas. I believe Sam Darnold is the safest pick at number one. Now, does he have some red flags? Absolutely. The turnovers are concerning. He threw too many interceptions. And I would say even outside of the interceptions, the more concerning part about Sam are the fumbles that he had. That can be corrected. Remember, Kurt Warner struggled mightily with fumbles at a point in his career and then actually fixed that before he went to Arizona and ended up taking the Cardinals to a Super Bowl. So there is some sort of precedent for Sam Darnold to fix some of those fumble issues. And I don't think he's going to have to force the football as much as he maybe did at USC in order to keep them in the game. So Sam Darnold to the Cleveland Browns, that's a long-term solution right there. With the number two pick, here's my first change from 3.0 to 4.0. The New York Giants, I have selecting Josh Allen, the quarterback from Wyoming. A couple of factors. Let's just look at this from New York's point of view. Okay. If you're the Giants, I think it would be foolish to put Eli Manning in the category of a Drew Brees or a Tom Brady. I'm not talking about ability-wise, I'm talking about longevity-wise. Okay, because Brees right now and Brady are the exception to the rule. They are defying father time, but father time is undefeated and eventually those players will succumb as well. And Eli turned 37 in January. Okay, so we think like, well, you know, Brady's 40, maybe he's got three more years. No, maybe not. And probably more likely not. So let's talk about a quarterback solution. Obviously, this is a quarterback rich in particular at the top and you start debating them with Darnell off the board. You've got Allen, you've got Mayfield and you've got Rosen. Something tells me that the Giants view themselves as more put together, if you will, for Baker Mayfield, the police video, the crotch grab, so on and so forth. Because of that, I think it will come down to Allen and Rosen for the Giants and that's not necessarily a problem for the Jets, which we'll get to at number three. But if you get to Allen and Rosen, I think it's more easier, I guess it's easier to explain away his red flags versus Rosen's. Let me explain. So we've already got to the point where the Giants are going to take a quarterback. Now you get to Allen versus Rosen and Allen's problems were completion percentage. You can explain those away very easily actually. His supporting cast at Wyoming was not very good. The wide receivers did not create space. They did not create windows to throw the football. Therefore, it leads to a lower completion percentage. That plus the fact that that was, I would categorize it as like a big boy offense, all right? You're not going to throw for 70% because you don't throw 13 screens a game for Wyoming. That's just not what they do.  Therefore, 56% becomes not great, but not as egregious as a 56% would, let's say in the air raid system for an Oklahoma or a Texas tech or a Washington state, if you catch my drift. They were forcing the ball down the field, tight windows, not a lot of separation. And all of a sudden you get at this point where a quarterback that maybe does have some accuracy is coined with the inaccurate mantra because of the 56%. You can explain it away. Whereas Rosen's red flags become durability, harder explain those away, right? I mean, durability is what it is. You're not on the field. You're not on the field. That's where I get to Josh Allen at number two, the Wyoming quarterback to the Giants. Long dissertation and from there it starts to fall into place a little bit quicker because the Jets need a quarterback. You get to Rosen versus Mayfield. I think Mayfield is the fit for New York. Okay, listen, he is very Nameth-esque, right? I mean, this guy is the personification of competence and cool and swagger. And I think that's what the Jets need, right? This is an organization that desperately needs a quarterback. I think Mayfield's the best quarterback in the draft. He might not be the safest pick and he might not be the right fit for the Giants, but I think he's the best quarterback in the draft. And I think he gets taken at number three right there in New York. Cleveland at number four, likely to move this selection. Okay, with Rosen still on the board, three quarterbacks gone, a really high probability that they moved the selection. Let's say they don't. Well, now the best offensive player is on the board as well. And so all of a sudden you can get Sam Darnold and Saquon Barkley. Now all of a sudden Saquon Barkley comes off the board at number four and Cleveland gets two very potent offensive weapons, one at quarterback and one at running back. Now you can go on and on about Saquon Barkley and everything that he provides a team, leadership, intangibles, explosiveness, the ability to create big plays in the special teams, the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. All that's true. You would love them on your team, you'd love them in your city. And Cleveland I think would be very excited if Saquon was there. There are some things that are worrisome about Saquon, but that's for another conversation and another day. At number five, the Denver Broncos, select Denzel Ward the corner from Ohio State. Think about it now. Denver won a Super Bowl by rushing the passer and playing tight, aggressive man coverage in the secondary. Keep to lead moves on, they need to fulfill, they need to fill that spot. I think Denzel Ward's the perfect fit, played man to man at Ohio State, really aggressive style of defense. He's a physical corner.  And if you were reading anything that Bill Belichick was talking about this week, he says the best two attributes that any defender can have at any position, whether it's corner linebacker, defensive end, safety, any of them, the ability to get off blocks and the ability to tackle. I think Denzel Ward does those better than any other corner in the draft. And then you put on top of that, he's a great man to man cover corner. I think he's a perfect fit for Denver at number five. At number six, the Colts could easily trade out of this spot. All these guys, the Browns, Broncos, Colts, all of these are prime trade opportunities, but if Indianapolis was sitting at six and Bradley Chubb is on the board, all of a sudden the worst pass rushing team in the National Football League have the best pass rusher available to them at number six and they're going to take him. Bradley Chubb should be the selection if he's available to Indianapolis at six. He's got a rare skill set in that he's a great pass rusher and yet he also plays with a high motor. A lot of times you don't get those two things molded into one another. Bradley Chubb certainly has those. Very gifted player, long lean, athletic, can bend well, gets to the quarterback and he would certainly help the Indianapolis Colts there at number six. At number seven is my first trade and the only trade I actually proposed in this. So what I have here is Buffalo trading the 12th and the 22nd pick to jump up to Tampa's number seven spot. Tampa gets to get two first-round draft picks. They move back. They can continue to bolster their roster but now all of a sudden Buffalo with guess who? Josh Rosen on the board.  I think that this is a pretty good fit. Not a great fit but a pretty good fit. Buffalo is desperate to get a signal caller and Rosen at least in my view is the best pure quarterback in the draft. It's hard to draft him any higher than this for me because of the durability questions but I think Josh Rosen could fit very well with Buffalo. At number eight the Chicago Bears. Chicago shocked everybody last year when they traded down one spot to take a player that would have been or excuse me trading up one spot to take a player that would have been there at their original selection. It was weird to say the least. I think they make up for that this year. They don't move and at number eight I think they get the most NFL ready, safest player on the board, Quinton Nelson. They need help in a lot of different areas but this is the type of guy that could be a Pro Bowl all-pro style player right away in the NFL even in his rookie season and probably do that for 10 plus years. That's a good selection, right? That's a safe pick. That's what you need to do if you're Chicago in the top 10. Not the shenanigans super troopers that happened last year. I think Quinton Nelson would be a good fit for Chicago there at eight. At number nine the San Francisco 49ers. This is a really advantageous spot to be if you're John Lynch because there's a lot of quality players on the board and one of the things that John Lynch has the opportunity to do is be great at every level of his defense. Remember this is a guy that won a Super Bowl with Tampa as a player, as a safety, and they were great at every level. He believes in that layered defense from to back inside out and he has an opportunity to build that. Think about what they've been building in the front seven. Think about their draft picks a year ago and now all of a sudden rather Minka Fitzpatrick's available to the San Francisco 49ers. What a great fit, great selection, a safety almost in the John Lynch mold in that he's tough, can play everywhere, highly intelligent. I'm talking about every position, man coverage, zone coverage, more athletic than John Lynch. I think Minka Fitzpatrick is such a good fit for the 49ers that's why I have him going there at number nine. Across the bay in Oakland at number 10 Derwin James. So a couple of safeties. I'm going to go back to that Tampa team because Lynch is going to try to replicate what that Tampa team had in terms of the layers of defense. And I think that John Gruden has a chance to start to replicate what Tampa was in that he didn't have to be the best offense in the NFL to win a Super Bowl. He could lean on his defense and be good enough on offense, right? They've got some really good players on the defensive side. You add a piece or two and all of a sudden you're talking about a team that could, could dominate on the defensive side. Derwin James safety from Florida State goes to Oakland. Gruden starts to build his Tampa version there with the Raiders in his second stint with the Raiders. So that's it. My top 10 picks, Sam Darnold, Josh Allen, Baker Mayfield, Saquon Barkley, Denzel Ward, Bradley Chubb, Josh Rosen, Quentin Nelson, Minka Fitzpatrick and Derwin James. All right, so that's the top 10. Now let's get to some free agency because clearly it's been a wild free agency period, really a couple of waves now of free agency. And as we all know, it's going to affect what happens in this draft in particular up there at the top. Let's talk about the Patriots. Okay, they're the ones that made the splashiest move of the week so far during this offseason. So they trade up essentially to get a second first round pick. Not really the Patriot way, right? They have not generally been aggressive upward in the draft as they have been aggressive downward in the draft, accumulating more picks later in the draft because they, they believe in their system of evaluation, remember? I mean, they believe in their free agents. They believe in their low round draft picks. They've built, you know, a decade of dominance on guys like that, you know? But this time they get aggressive and Cook's leaves, who maybe wasn't a great fit for them anyways, in particular if you read between the tea leaves like Tom Brady, maybe not a great fit. Cook's moves on to the Rams, which we'll get to that in a second. And now New England has two first round draft picks. Um, this is really important because they have two, what I would deem glaring needs, and there are positions that have to be fixed immediately. You can talk all you want about weapons and so on and so forth. The bottom line is, is New England has got to get to the passer and they've got to protect the passer. They've got to do that better in particular after losing some of their players like Nate soldier, their, uh, mainstay at left tackle. Um, they were, I thought too old rushing the passer last year. So at 23 and at 31, I have them addressing those two specific needs in the first round. Mike McGlinchey, the offensive tackle for Notre Dame, I think is a good fit for New England. Uh, really tough player, smart player, solid offensive line that I think fits the Patriot way down there at 31. Then I've got Sam Hubbard, the defensive in for Ohio State. He's tested really well. He's flying under the radar. Remember Bill Belichick was actually at Ohio State's pro day. I believe it was to check out some of these pass rushers like Tyquan Lewis, Jaylin Holmes, and more particularly Sam Hubbard. Um, Sam is very smart. He can be a role player, but he's also a guy that Ohio State used in several different situations, i.e. he can move down and play the three technique, he can play the five technique, he can play the nine technique, all that to say he can line up anywhere and be effective as a pass rusher. So that's what I believe New England is going to be trying to do. They got aggressive to move up. They have to address the offensive tackle position. They've got to address their pass rush. And this gives them a chance in this first round to do both. Now let's talk about the team that they were dance partners with, uh, in that trade, the Rams. What? I mean, as much as you can win the off season and rarely does the team that win the off season win the Super Bowl. But however, at this point, they're all in, man.  Granite wasn't a great NFC West and Garoppolo didn't play all year. So it's going to be a very different division this year. But you clearly have your quarterback moving forward. You got that fixed. You win the NFC West. You lead the league in scoring. And all of a sudden they get Marcus Peters, a keep to leave all of a sudden, the best tandem cornerbacks in the league. Think about that. Like Rams have the best cornerbacks in the league. That's crazy. Just like that. Endama can sue up front with Aaron Donald. What? Like good luck blocking those guys in particular in the run game, much less pass rush will come, right? I'm talking about like, can you run the football against the Rams? Nope. Can't do it. Can't do it. And then they get Brandon cooks. We'll see how that plays out. Getting weapons for a guy like Jared Goff is always good. I think cooks fits pretty well with what they're trying to do. They're not a system of we're going to try to have big bodied wide receivers that have possession style of catches. They like kind of a more of a West Coast style of system that runs on timing, spacing, things of that nature. So I think cooks is a fit. Just think about this. Combine nine all pro selections and 12 pro bowls with just those four Peters players, including Marcus Peters, who was a defensive rookie of the year. Endama can sue was a defensive rookie of the year. The Rams all of a sudden, I mean, are you kidding me? You're gonna have to deal with that, which then begs the question, Arizona, what are you doing? Like, look at your division all of a sudden. You weren't that good in your division last year, probably not going to be all that good in your division this next year as well. And listen, I'm not trying to throw shade. It's very easy to project San Francisco and the Rams in the playoffs. That's all I'm saying. Very easy to project that. Those two teams are clearly all in, clearly saying, we know what the other is doing. We're going to compete with them for the next five, six, seven years for division supremacy. I think you've got a situation right now.  I think we can see that with the Los Angeles Rams and the San Francisco 49ers. So kudos to the Rams. I think kudos to New England for what they were doing. I think that's a trade that's going to benefit both sides. And to me, that's the mark of a great trade. Great trades do not fleece one side because then you can never go back to that dance partner. Okay, so you never want to hammer the other person in a trade deal. What you want is both people to be successful off of that because that means that the fit was the fit. The players are doing well. The teams are doing well. And ultimately you can improve yourselves later in, what, two, three years when you need to trade again. You've got to partner right there because equally it was amicable between the two. So that's kind of what I'm thinking about the offseason right now. All right, let's get to a player evaluation. We're going to do this Madden rating style. We're on the internet. You guys are probably gamers have never played the game. I know Boomi, if you can Boomi online, Boomi online right now. And that also be interactive. All right, invite the show with some friends, be interactive, send us some of your comments. We'll try to get to them as best we can maybe next week or the week after. Josh Allen player evaluation Madden style. I've got some areas where we're going to rate him one to 100. And what are we going to start with? What do we got? Awareness. Let's see, one to 100 and awareness. I think we're going to go with 65, 65 on awareness. And the reason why I mark him, I would consider this down. Okay, so anything under 75 for me, I don't know how you view Madden ratings, but under 75 for me, you need to improve. You need to get like minimum, you need to be at about 75 to be an adequate starter in the national football league. If you want to be a really good starter, you need to be in the 80s. If you want to be an elite starter, you got to be in the 90s. Okay, so in this category, in terms of awareness, I'd say 65. I say this because he does not anticipate throws very well. This could be born out of a couple of things. One, he just doesn't and he trusts his arm too much because it's so powerful that he's always going to try to see a throw before letting it rip. And two, he's been burned by subpar wide receivers too many times that he's going to wait to see the throw before he lets it rip because he can. Okay, either scenario is bad and you got to get yourself out of that and learning awareness, learning anticipation, very tough, very tough. I can't give you a great example of a guy that I thought didn't have great awareness or anticipation in particular with windows down the field in college that then got that later in his career. It's one of the reasons why I'm not as high on Allen as some of the other quarterbacks. But yeah, 65 for awareness. All right, next category. Oh, geez. This is just because I can't, I feel like one of those stodgy baseball writers right now is like, I can't give a first ballot vote. I just can't do 100. But like, this is my first 99, right? I mean, it's one of the more powerful, high velocity, high RPM arms I've ever seen. I've seen a lot of guys throw football, you can imagine, right? I've been around this game forever. My dad was a high school football coach for 30 years, played at Colorado, banged around and NFL minicamps.  When you see Josh Allen throw football, it's like, whoa. I mean, it it's hard not to get enamored with that. You have to remind yourself that the position is more than just arm strength. But man, 99. If he was on Madden, you throw a football over that mountain. Like cousin Rico, that's right. Rico, this one's tougher. This one's tougher. It'd be really easy for me to write like a 55 down right now. It would be very easy, but I'm not going to. Okay. Accuracy is a two way street.  I haven't made up my mind about this guy's accuracy. There's a part of accuracy that has to do with timing and spacing throwing the football.  And it's not your fault, right?  It's like, what are you going to do? Sometimes receivers jump when they're not supposed to. Sometimes they do weird things to try to catch the ball behind them. On tape, he doesn't have the most accurate arm. His wide receivers don't help them at all. At all. Okay. So not the most accurate. I think he can get there. I'm not going to knock him like some others would. That's like this big deal is like, well, he's not accurate. It's two-way street, man. Very much a two-way street. If you haven't been in the pocket and felt the rush and understood the windows or the timing and man coverage, it's hard to explain.  Perfect throw based on the defense, the timing, everything involved. And the wide receiver is like running around the field like a slappy and like falls in complete. And I was like, nice throw. You're like, yeah, it was. It was a beautiful throw, actually. I wish you knew. The wide receiver just jogs off. No one says anything to him. I'd like to say something to him. Maybe I can clap back at him on the sideline. But then I'd be a bad teammate. Way to go. All right, next. Speed and agility. Not applicable, right? I mean, this guy's in the pocket. It's like, is Rathisberger's speed and agility really a factor? No, his strength is, right? His overall I mean, it's not even his agility, right?  It's not necessarily that he's so fleet of foot. Is Tom Brady fleet of foot? No, is he agile? No, not really. They manipulate the pocket well and Alan manipulates the pocket better than you would expect. So if you're talking about that, right, like that type of agility, I would say Alan is adequate, right? So speed doesn't matter. His agility, though, his ability to move subtly in the pocket, get himself on balance in order to throw the football down the field, about a 75. I would say it's average right now. It could get better, certainly, but he's a big guy and he's still young. Remember, a lot of times guys that big, this is going to sound so strange, guys that large, he's a large guy.  So they're still kind of learning. Small guys have generally been small forever. So their agility is what it has always been because that's what they've had to rely on forever. A guy like Josh Allen, he's not generally had to rely on that. He's relied on his big arm. He can manipulate the pocket just fine. I think he can get better over time. All right, lastly, kind of set this one up at the beginning. I'd say Josh Allen right now is kind of average NFL quarterback. I think this is a positive rating for him. I think it would be easier to rate him lower than this. We'll see how it goes. I think fit has a lot to do with what Josh Allen can become at the NFL level. Great kid. I'm talking about a great kid. We'll be tremendous in the locker room. Really love him. I hope he has a lot of success. I have my question marks. I don't think he can be an elite quarterback in the NFL, but for right now, 75. So let's try to project that out a little bit. Not Madden style rating, but like comps. So if you don't like the rating system, let's talk about comps. When I talk about comps, I always try to look at best case scenario. All right, so for instance, last week I told you like the comps for Mayfield or Russell Wilson and Drew Brees, that's a best case scenario. That's not just like run of the mill average comp. Best case scenario for Josh Allen, I think is Joe Flacco. Okay, think about it now. Flacco, where does he win outside the numbers and down the field? Right? He's not a great intermediate thrower. He doesn't win with touch all the time, although he has touch, and certainly he's got some accuracy, but he's really dangerous outside the numbers and down the field. Think about when they won the Super Bowl. I mean, that's what they did, right? I mean, they were struggling offensively, and then all of a sudden they changed some things up. Remember on the offensive staff and they started doing what? Throwing the ball down the field, allowing him to set up and use that big arm to get the ball over the defense. That's what I think Josh Allen needs to do. If he goes to a place that's trying to run him into a intricate West Coast timing oriented, middle of the field oriented system, I think he's going to struggle because he doesn't generally change speeds well. He's a fastball thrower, so he needs to go to an offense that wants to sit back and throw big fastballs outside the numbers and down the field. And if that bit takes place, I think he'll reach his potential like Joe Flacco. Now let's talk about a comparison that I hear a lot and yet I don't buy into as much. And that is the Carson Wentz comparison. Okay, I get it. They both went to a quote-unquote small school, although I think Wyoming, that's a little bit disparaging to call them a small school like North Dakota State. They played for the same coach, Craig Bull. I get it. They were a little under the radar and then like someone says before their last year in college, like, hey, watch this guy. You say, you know, he's on a lot of people's draft boards. And so they had a similar path that doesn't mean they're a similar player. Okay, I think that that distinction needs to be made. The comparison for me between Wentz and Allen is path. It's not player. Wentz is much more athletic. Wentz can change his arm angle. Wentz was a winner. I mean, Allen in Wyoming didn't win a lot, right? Like he's got, he's so gifted as a thrower of the football, whereas like Wentz was kind of like this rugged battler at North Dakota State. He won a lot of football games. Yeah, he had the frame, but he was athletic. He did have a big arm, but not nearly what Josh Allen's was. He had some injury problems his last year. He overcame them. Hopefully he can overcome this injury issue that he had this year with Philadelphia. But again, just keep that in the back of your mind. When you hear comparisons for Josh Allen to Carson Wentz, keeping them back in your mind, people are doing that more so out of laziness because they're comparing path than they are player. The players are very different. Think more Joe Flacco rather than Carson Wentz. All right, let's clat back a little bit. And I'm going to do this to two different tweets. One, I'm going to reply to thoughtfully because I thought it was a question posed that I'd like to answer. And that's what Twitter should be used for. And then another was a less than glowing remark on Twitter that I'll respond to first. So Jason at Jason Bach underscore writes, Allen going before Rosen automatically makes this mock trash. Says who? It's a mock. Like, what are you evaluating this against the actual draft? That comes at the end of April, Jason. So like trash in your mind and somebody else's mind. I don't quite understand because if you talk with NFL decision makers like I do, you'll hear a lot of them like Josh Allen over Josh Rosen. Why? Because of the very things I talked about at the beginning of the show. Josh Rosen's red flags are harder to get over than Josh Allen's. You can explain a way in accuracy with Josh Allen or lack of competition with Josh Allen because you can say there's been a lot of quarterbacks that have come from small schools or a lack of competition and had success at the NFL. His supporting cast and his wide receivers did not help him throw for a high percentage. All absolutely true. All absolutely true. Meanwhile, you get to the red flag with Josh Rosen. I'm not talking about his attitude either. Okay. Let's leave that at the doorstep. I'm talking about the fact that his durability is an issue. See, there's nothing I can explain that away with. It's not like, oh, those injuries didn't really mean anything. Well, that means he was just not on the field for no reason. Worse, worse. Rosen's a beautiful player. I love Josh Rosen. I haven't gone top 10 in the NFL draft. Okay. I don't think he's a bad player by any stretch of the imagination. I think when you just look at him play the position, he's the most fluid. He's the most beautiful of any of these quarterbacks. The fact of the matter is though, he takes some hits. Born out of competitiveness and toughness, he takes some hits and subjects himself to durability issues. He was not on the field for UCLA for a number of games in the last couple of years. That hurt their chances to win. Well, that's going to hurt the chances of the NFL organization to win as well. So Allen over Rosen, while I might think Rosen is a better quarterback, there's some NFL personnel that can explain a way a red flag for Josh Allen, and it's very difficult to do that for Josh Rosen. Remember, a team's job is to minimize risk when drafting a player, in particular in the top 10 in the NFL draft. If you can minimize the risk with Allen over Rosen, you're probably going to do that. The fact that you think this is trash just means that you have no idea what standards actually are because there's no way you can actually say that with any definitive mark. The draft's not until the end of April, guy. All right, guys, that's going to do it for On The Clock this week. I appreciate you watching, being a part of the show. Remember, send us your comments, your questions, particularly if they're thoughtful. I'll answer them thoughtfully. If they're not thoughtful, I will answer them unthoughtfully, if that's a word. Nah, until next week, I'm Joel Klatt on The Clock, next week on Wednesday.


5 plus tips, tricks, exploits, glitches, every Hogwarts player needs to know. Now if you guys do enjoy this video and want to see more Hogwarts legacy, make sure you subscribe and turn those notifications on, also leaving a like really helps me out. Okay so today guys I bring you 5 plus tips and tricks you need to know about this game. These will help you level up quicker and tons of XP, money and many other things. Okay so we're going to start with XP and reach that level 40, the quickest way to do this. Okay so it's important to mention that XP is tied directly to your challenges, the only way you can get to a level 40 which is max level in this game is to complete every challenge in the game. Yes I know this is kind of hard to believe but it's true, for instance if you're looking at challenges guys we can see it says defeat 100 dark wizards. Upon you doing this final challenge guys and unlocking this trait, you will get no more XP for defeating wizards after this point. Same goes for those Dougbugs, same goes for those goblins and every other enemy in the game. You will earn XP from said enemy until you unlock their represented challenge. Once that challenge is done you will no longer earn XP from them. And this isn't just enemies you can defeat too, these are quests, this is exploration, this is field guide pages, this is room of requirements stuff, every single challenge here has XP tied to it. So yes the only way to get to a level 40 is to complete these challenges, so keep an eye on them. Okay so how about earning fast XP, I mean yes we know they're tied to challenges, what tips and tricks can I give you guys to earn quicker XP so you can level up faster? Well obviously doing quests will earn you XP and also doing the many many exploration challenges scattered around the map will also give you XP, things like popping balloons, things like the landing platforms, things like the Merlin trials, these will all give you XP. But in my opinion the quickest way you can earn XP is by doing those combat challenges, that means defeating certain enemies and the fastest way to defeat certain enemies in no time at all is those battle arenas. Now battle arenas can be found on the map, there are three in total, if you have the dark arts battle arena, if you don't have this and you don't have the dark arts pack there's only two you can locate and play within. One's located up north and one's located down south, you can see these on the screen right here.  So this is a real quick way of earning fast XP to level up especially through those early levels of the game. And at the same time guys you will also unlock traits, you're doing these, cosmetics for your gear so yes get these done, these are definitely my opinion one of the quicker ways to earn XP. Now a trick you can use here guys is changing the game's difficulty settings, if you put this on a store difficulty there's more or less no challenge from enemies within this game and that means when you're in those battle arenas you're just going to wipe out waves without having any trouble whatsoever. It makes no difference to the XP gains either. Again XP is tied to your challenges, changing the game's difficulty will not change anything in regards to XP. Now another way to earn quite a bit of XP so around 2 fat or 1800 to be precise is to capture those beasts. Now if you've progressed the game to get yourself the room of your requirement and you've then progressed Dic, if you haven't done this do this, progress Dic and he will have a quest for you called the Alpha Nabsak and the Lume, complete this quest and you will get the Nabsak, the Nabsak means you can go around and collect those beasts and it's actually got us an easy way to earn XP from collecting beasts if you haven't done it already because there's a total of 30 XP per beast you can collect and a total of 60 beasts rewarding you this XP so that's 1800 XP which you can do relatively quickly. Now if you've got the Nabsak you want to come to this spot on a map right here, this is a great place to capture between 8 and 10 beasts in probably a minute or so and these will all give you XP if you haven't earned it already. Again change your game's difficulty to that story difficulty and literally all you have to do guys is point the Nabsak at that beast and activate it you'd have to do nothing else and it means capturing beasts is so much easier. Now to reset these beasts people all you need to do is capture all of the beasts within this area, fly away from this area, reset time of day in your map, menu and then combat guys and the beast will have reset. So you have two easy ways to earn a ton of XP in the game otherwise guys it's all down to your challenges. Okay so what about money, what about that gold, what about that galleon? Well again capturing these beasts is by far the best way to do this and well if you have that Nabsak like I've already explained this is rewarded to you for completing the quest of the Alpha Nabsak and the Loom and once you have this Nabsak it means you can collect beasts and then go ahead and sell them and then you want to come to this puff skin den right here. So come to this puff skin den people and capture all of these little puff skins make sure you've caught every one of them then guys simply jump on your broom and fly to this point a couple of hundred yards away then guys just skip time by once. After doing this go back to that puff skin den and all of the little critters will have respawned simply catch them again and why can't you repeat these guys until your inventory is full and it really is that simple all you got to do is make sure you've caught every puff skin within this den using that reveal to reveal where they are is just a massive massive plus because I do believe if any escape and you forget to pick them up it can mess up the rotation of trying to get them to respawn and you can repeat these guys until your inventory your beast inventory is full now eventually this beast inventory will get bigger so you can hold up to like 40 probably a bit more of these beasts at once so you can earn a ton of money doing this but yes once that inventory is full simply head to the brood and peck vendor within hogsmeade here guys you can sell all of these beasts for 120 gold each now another way can earn plenty of money and this is more or less a afk sort of thing if you want to do other things and that is by breeding numerous pets now if you've gone through digs entire questline which means you have completed the mission for him our phoenix rising you will have unlocked four the variants within your room of requirement now each one of these the variants can hold four breeding pens so that's 16 breeding pens so if you have 16 sets of parents it means you can breed 16 babies every 30 minutes this means you can earn roughly 2000 gold 2000 gallon well actually it's about 1920 to be precise every 30 minutes which i know it's nowhere near as good as the farm i've just spoke about but it's still decent if you're doing other things so yes you want to do this you will need to purchase the breeding pen from the toms and scrolls vendor within hogsmeade and you will need to end plenty of moonstone which i'll talk about in a second to set all these up it doesn't matter what these you have all babies sell for the same so what about moonstone how can you get fast moonstone i mean if you want to do up your room of requirements if you want to do up your other variants what methods can you use to get plenty of moonstone because you're probably going to need it now firstly when you unlock the room of requirement you will be taught about many of the spells you can use to define your experience with editing your room of requirement and you will learn about the evanescal spell what this does is it allows you to use your spell on certain objects and it will turn them into moonstone only within your room of requirement so if you walk around within your room of requirement every single painting wall decoration lamp chair rug all can be turned into that moonstone now if you take about five minutes doing this you can earn easily 500 plus moonstone for this so that's an easy way to get a nice chunk of moonstone to start another thing you can do is is buy the refineries from the toms and scrolls of vendor within hugs mid set them up within your room of requirement and these will give you 10 moonstone every 10 minutes you can conjure a max of three of these so that's 30 moonstone every 10 minutes which isn't bad going but you will have to stand around because it won't continuously make this you have to pick up the 10 before it starts on the other 10 so it's a bit of a pain in the ass but hey it's three moonstone at the end of the day but do these guys a much better way of getting moonstone you will earn well a max of 9 9 9 in probably about 10 to 15 minutes and this is how you do unscreen now guys you want to come to this point on the map which is far left of the north Hogwarts region area and you want to come to this flu flame now from this point guys you can run a route and earn an absolute ton of that moonstone and you'll see me running this route on screen now now once you get to the end of this route people simply fast travel back to that flu flame the coral ruins flu flame from here guys you need to skip time six times because you need to skip three days if you skip three days all these materials will have respawned so you need to go into your menu people and skip time six times skipping it once only changes 12 hours so skipping it six times will change it three days then guys you can simply run this route again until you're maxed out on those moonstone and it really is as simple as that which you repeat until you've got enough okay so another trick you can use guys this will help you with legendary gear it'll help you with traits and many other things now scattered around this whole open world map there are plenty of these legendary chests so keep an eye out for them these guarantee you those legendos but there's a trick you can use to give you a guaranteed legendary that you need for instance if you desperately need a neck wear legendary or a cloak and robes legendary there's a way to guarantee you get these and it's simple so once you locate one of these chests all you want to do is create a manual save before you open these chests then guys go ahead and open the chest if it's not a piece that you need for a certain gear slot simply load up that save you just created and rinse and repeat do this guys until you get that slight gear legendary that you need this also works with every other chest in the game including those ornate trait chests so if there's certain traits you are looking for for your gear to perfect your build you can do this with those chests too now the trait chests come from the bandit camps so on your map you'll see plenty of these bandit camps size doesn't matter whatsoever and when you go to these bandit camps people you'll have to take out a certain group of enemies once you do this you can loot that ornate chest which guarantees you a trait but if you use that same method here guys creating a manual save before opening this chest if you then open the chest and don't get a trait you want you can simply reload up that save you just made and keep opening the chest until you get that trait that you need now these chests will drop traits from tier one all the way up to a tier three it is random but obviously once you have that trait it's locked out the loot pool so traits get easier and easier to unlock so keep that in mind now lastly people are settings i want to give you guys to make this game a more enjoyable experience especially if you play on console with that controller so go into your settings guys and go down to display settings in my opinion here these are absolutely a must you want to turn off motion blur turn off that depth of field you want to turn off this chromatic aberration and you want to turn off film grain these will make your experience and the way the game looks a much better one in my opinion the depth of field i'd probably say try out for yourself i mean this does impact the gpu performance as it says but turning off can basically solve many performance issues the game is having right now so for now try it with the earth and see how it feels for you in regards to performance mode you can either have fidelity or performance me personally i feel 60 frames with performance is the way to go but hey if you can handle 30 frames with a higher resolution try that out but in my opinion it definitely impacts gameplay now you also want to come down to now gameplay options here guys it's important you turn this off if combat is feeling a bit weird for you camera relative targeting when this is on which is default selects active targets with the camera when it's off selects active targets with the movement stick grants off screen enemy targeting now if you've ever noticed when you're in a battle and you're aiming for one enemy and it just hits the other that's because this is on turn this off guys and you're 90% of the time hit that enemy you're trying to focus on which is massive in regards to that target and it does make a massive massive difference now when i first started playing this game the controls felt weird the camera sensitivity felt weird aiming felt weird everything felt weird and i quickly spent my first hour or so adjusting my settings and these are the ones i've come to now to absolutely love the game feels perfect for me with these now with these what i would say is you probably you can copy mine so it feels for you but you can slightly adjust them a little more aiming sensitivity i didn't touch and neither did the aim acceleration i've left these i believe as they were but the camera acceleration the camera sensitivity and the follow camera speed all are adjusted slightly upwards so try these out guys and see how they feel for you but there we have it guys hugwarts legacy tips tricks explodes and more and well if you did enjoy this video leaving a like really helps me out if you like what you're seeing once you more hugwarts be sure to subscribe guys check out my channel for probably every guy you're ever going to need on this game and hopefully people i will see you on that next one


Hi everybody and welcome to our session on championing social justice. I will be your moderator for the session. My name is Laura Wyman Powers and I am the head of impact at Echoing Green, which is an early stage global social innovation fund based in New York. Today's conversation is extremely timely. We are at a moment of reckoning globally as we face two major international pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound public health and economic implications for societies globally. It's also highlighted and exacerbated a different sort of pandemic the pre existing systemic racism and inequities and inequalities across our societies.  And in addition, the killing of George Floyd by a white police officer in Minneapolis accelerated one of the largest social movements in recent memory as protests emerged in over 2000 cities across 60 countries internationally in support of black lives matter. We're at a moment where there is palpable restlessness for change for fairer post pandemic futures. We're going back to normal is not an option. We need not to rebuild our systems but to fundamentally reimagine them. Several stakeholders working towards the sustainable development goals are wrestling with the intersection between social justice and social impacts and asking questions such as how to activate the right levers of change internally. How we think about a social justice imperative as part of core business and how to build targeted and inclusive partnerships with marginalized communities to elevate their voices and experiences and build their power. The concept of justice belongs not only in SDG 16 achieving the SDGs will require recognizing systemic inequities and championing a justice agenda across all the SDGs. Before we dive in I also want to mention that we'll have a live graphic scriber joining us who will be documenting the conversation so we'll get to see how that turns out in the end. Now I'm going to briefly introduce our panelists and then we'll dive into our conversation. So with us today we have anger Anderson under secretary general of the United Nations and executive director of the UN environment program. Previously anger was director general of the International Union for the conservation of nature and has held roles at the World Bank and the United Nations. We have Mina mashecki senior advisor on trade ESG emerging markets and technology at Rock Creek. She's also an associate professor at Shanghai University of international business and economics. And prior to joining Rock Creek she led the division of international trade and headed the trade negotiations and commercial diplomacy environment and climate change at the UN conference on trade and development. Third panelist is Melanie Schultz van Hagen CEO of the Porticus Foundation. She's previously state secretary for transport and water management the minister of infrastructure and environment and has held other positions for the Netherlands. With previous experience with the UN World Bank and in the private sector. So let us dive right in. Our first question for our three panelists are the SDGs fit for purpose as a framework for companies institutions and governments to address the root causes of systemic and inequalities and social injustices. And if not, what's needed. Ingrid you want to kick us off. And thank you for inviting and it's a real pleasure to be together with these distinguished ladies here so thank you very much. And thank you very much Nora for facilitating us look. I, I, you know, my on ramp on surprisingly will be on justice and injustice and social inequity and environment right and sit as a head of the United Nations environment program and I will say that we still have that roadmap. The SDGs that address social injustices and systemic inequalities, but we are really unpacked each of the SDGs and understood fully what actually that roadmap looks like. Because we still have a long way in achieving them and you did a very nice introduction precisely on this. We look at the specifics of the SDGs over 90% of the goals and targets on the SDGs correspond to human rights obligations. And I would say that social justice and equality issues underpin all of these, if not all the SDGs. Now, if we look at the Secretary General's report that he issued on how we're doing on the SDGs he issued that to the high level political forum in July. It wasn't as much progress as we would like to see. We've seen some progress on energy and, and child mortality and good, you know, we like, but progress has stalled on important issues like hunger climate change and equality inequality right. So, and then along comes COVID as you rightly said and pushed us much further back and it lays bare, these super profound inequalities that exist amongst countries within countries and within races and or folks that are discriminated against in anyone setting on And so that's sort of the bigger picture here. So I would still say yes the SDGs are there as a as a map, but we have a long way to go to understand that and as for companies I think companies as a long long way to journey, because they haven't really done to grapple with, with maybe climate, maybe just their CO2 footprint maybe that's as far as they could get, or maybe just the carbon the actual hydrocarbon element in an investable, in an investable right. So there's a long way to go to really embrace all of this. Some companies have done or attempting to and Bravo to them. But let me stop here so I can also hear from my fellow panelists here. Thanks. Mina, do you want to jump in? Mina, you're on mute. As instructed. There you go. Okay, great. So thank you so much for inviting the rock group and name on unfortunately our founder and CEO couldn't be here so I'm trying to fill in her place. Having worked on the SDGs and before that on MDGs and trade and development and ensuring inclusiveness. I had of course followed the whole development of the SDGs and contributed to it in terms of trade. And as was mentioned by the progress has been very slow and I think the two progress reports we got from the UN Secretary General points out that despite some progress, it has been slow and even in some cases, there has been a reversal. So that's very much of concern, but as a roadmap, as was mentioned, it's, you know, actually the development component for the whole world. What's new with it, of course, is, as you all know, that it's not just for developing countries, whereas MDGs was more, you know, focus of how to help the developing countries. This is really a global agenda for all countries, all companies and all governments. And therefore, in that sense, I think it has made a huge progress in changing the mindset. But the goals, of course, have not been implemented in an ambitious way, neither by governments nor by companies. And I think the NGOs have been very concerned about this and the civil society that things have been working in silos, you know, even the goals have been looked at in silos and not in terms of interlinkages and looking at them as the, you know, their interrelationship with just doing one without doing all of them together really doesn't achieve a deep impact. And I think what is important is that companies have really adopted this. I see more and more, you know, companies don't say something out there. They just don't like putting, they do put this, you know, the colorful thing on their, on themselves and they embrace that, but they also little by little have come on board, and many of them are trying to make impact and change and of course, you know, there is a collaboration, like RCG or a group collaborates with a network of companies with UNPRI with WEF, of course, IFC World Bank. So we we think that the only way to implement is collaboration. And this collaboration has to be strengthened. And, of course, COVID-19 has in a way broken down also a little bit this collaboration weakened it because we all talk on Zoom, but we don't have the human contact and the depth of collaboration has been a little bit slowed down. And I think a little bit we have moved again to the more selfish agenda, you know, from this very proactive and ambitious agenda. We are all in countries and in even companies trying to survive in this very, very difficult environment of COVID. So therefore, I think that it's absolutely relevant. It's fit for purpose. But the key is to have joint efforts, joint up thinking, collaboration and see the interrelationship between the goals, and also realize that COVID-19 has really driven back the implementation of people and reversed many situations. Like, for example, if we look at SDG-1 we see before COVID-19 projections suggested that 6% of global population still be living in extreme poverty in 2013.  And additional people are millions are living in extreme poverty. So, you know, we see that on the first most important goal, actually there has been a lot of negative influence with the global economic recession, the fact that people are more looking unilaterally than globally and multilaterally. And this has driven that back. We see hunger, again, you know, disruption and 121 million more people could be pushed back to brink of starvation. We see on gender equality, you know, RCG has very much focuses on investing on through the gender lens and we devote 2.5 billion to women managers. So we are very much focused on the gender lens. And we see in gender equality, you know, domestic violence has increased, women have lost jobs because they're in the informal sector. And also, basically, women also, when we look at unemployment, we see that they're much lower in terms of higher, they have higher unemployment than male unemployment. And so this is a major concern to us, this backtracking on many of the goals. And that just, just completing this with saying that, you know, trillions, about three trillions are just needed for emerging markets to be able to survive. So thank you very much. So I'm, I'm given what the first two pianists have shared on this notion that we're backtracking in many cases. I'm curious, Melanie, your take on the question of the SCGs as being the roadmap for this next phase. Well, it's always easy to have a call to action, but really coming to action is much more difficult. And I would never change the SCG framework would watch your question because I know as a former politician how much negotiation there has been about the SCG So never change your word because then it all starts over again. But most important now is when we want to come to action is to build our ecosystems. So let me tell you five sentences about Porticus or Porticus is a is a private family philanthropy. We work for a family that has been entrepreneurial for many, many years. And they are so they have done so for 180 years now and we're active in 90 countries with approximately 1000 partners. What is important for us is that all those partners have wonderful ideas.  And so we try to do that, but more often we also try to support alliances. So to get that ecosystem there that is really going to implement the actions from the SCGs. For example, I had a call learning call this morning with the global commons alliance. This is a very large alliance of different organizations. It's more a network of networks that are really involved in creating science, science based targets for the SCGs. So they there are businesses in their social entrepreneurs, media, scientific institutes, philanthropies. It's really, really wonderful to see that if you will join and be very practical that you can cut a lot done. Because at the end when this network comes out then governments also will be very much interested in implementing it. Another example is yesterday during also during WEF the COVID alliance for social entrepreneurs was for social enterprises was launched and the idea about that is that there are different organizations that help social enterprises because they often have the solution for larger societal issues. But now, especially now during COVID, of course, the social entrepreneurs are present. So it's important to support them and to be sure that they survive and that we also amplify an injector voices into the bigger debate. So again, creating those alliances creating an ecosystem is very, very important. And this is the ecosystem itself and then also looking at the actions we also need to look at how to transform the more technical approaches that we often see also into more social political solutions for change. I have to look a lot to tell about that also but maybe that will also be part of the next part of the conversation. Thank you, Melanie. So, you know, the environment has has come up as an example a couple times, and I think it can be a useful analogy, you know, I think with climate change we've made some progress in terms of how institutions in particular are moving of their responsibility, moving from offsetting the negative impacts, such as buying carbon offsets to avoiding the negative impacts in the first place not engaging in that harmful behavior. We obviously have a ways to go but I think the conversation has evolved a lot over the last few years. I'm curious what you all are seeing in your institution and in your peers, kind of those that you either are in alliances with or partner with. When it comes to justice, are we seeing that same mindset shift, moving from offsetting negative impacts to actually avoiding them in the first place or maybe even proactively promoting justice internally and externally.  So, I should be unmuted now. Okay, thank you very much. Now, I think, I mean, the bottom line here is that, you know, there is, I'm going to go back to the UN for obvious reasons, and to the universal declaration on human rights, because we there is a fundamental right and thus justice comes into the picture to the right to life, the right to health, the right to food, the right to water, the right to sanitation. Each of these are assumed to be given. And when we begin to mess with environments such a way that they're not given, we have to understand that environment and human rights somehow, these two, these two small streams meet in a river. And here, then there is the sense that protection on human rights helps to protect the environment, and therefore helps to deliver justice, right? When you have firm human rights in place, chances are that you also have enhanced rights on the environmental side. And I think the UN Office of the Commission on Human Rights have highlighted this many, many times. It's interesting to understand that 150 countries have in their constitution or in their legislation or in some sort of body of law enshrined this right to a healthy environment. And that's really important, or in agreements that they have signed somehow with others. The trouble is, I'd say, that not everybody's living up to that, right? So they may have these very fine words in jurisprudence or in the constitutions. So from our side, we're doing all we can to support this dimension. And I think we just heard, and it was Melanie was talking about some degree of regression, right? We have scenes in countries regressing at the time of COVID, right? So some of these established rights or established practices, there's been a backslide. And that's very unfortunate. We don't want to see lowering of standards, all of that stuff. We do want to see that being strengthened. On the other hand, you have seen countries where they've strengthened. And we are saying, right now, we are pouring these billions of dollars, trillions, actually, into our economies, right? And this is our money. This is our taxpayer's money. So these funds cannot go to fund dirty and gray.  It must be now because we will hopefully not see another time when that amount of public money is going into essentially private sector. And I get it. It's important. It's, it's critical to sustain. But then let us make sure that they're green strings attacks. Let us make sure that we're investing in green R&D. Let us make sure that we have those kind of benchmarks for where this money is going. Just to give you an example, Republic of Korea, they put 100 billion out. There's lots of green strings attached. Or if you want to go to a poorer countries, Pakistan, 40, 50 million into what planting trees because it creates jobs, but also is really good. Kenya, I think was around 20 million into protecting forests and the conservancies that normally is where tourism would be generated and therefore money in local people's pockets, but preserving this. And I could go on. So we are seeing some very positive moves in the pandemic times, but it's not enough. So this idea therefore you speak on justice and understanding that the rights and the rights that we assume are embedded and enshrined and inalienable. They become, we can risk that they can become undermined if we're not mindful that environment forms part of that conversation. And, and the more awareness that you and others can create around this, the better it is because young people need to demand it. And it needs to be part and parcel of that conversation of the rights that we have and the expectations we have of our policy makers. I love this phrase green strings. It makes me wonder what the equivalent of justice strings are that could be attached moving forward. Mina or Melanie do you want to chime in on this question. Yeah, I just want to point out, of course, you know, our human rights and the Declaration Universal Declaration are very key. But then we see even developed countries and even the most developed United States or China has benefited from, you know, a miracle of development. And they're actually in practice, not implementing the human rights declaration. So signature is very easy to UN PRI to, you know, SDGs and to human rights but in practical terms, and we see in practice, like black lives matters and has brought up the fact that, you know, this has not been internalized fully. Human Rights Commission most of the time focuses on like developing countries, African countries, you know, all those who actually, I mean, there are deep reasons why they don't implement sometimes it's economic reasons, educational reasons, of course. But most developed countries, that means they're really, you know, in terms of financing and implementing human rights, they shouldn't have any problem, but they have deep ingrained racism and injustices and they don't face it. But first you have to recognize this fact that racism exists, injustice exists, and then once you recognize that, and you share this experience that is very painful, then you should find action oriented, you know, and very comprehensive programs to deal with this issue of social justice and human rights. But then also there's the problem that businesses and governments, you know, you cannot just do, you know, programs for externally, okay, like we invest in firms and we expect their carbon emissions go down or whatever, or they have equality and gender dimensions ingrained in them. We have to implement it internally in our own organization. So let's say UN should internally implement gender lens and ensure that, you know, in all dimensions, equality in terms of salaries, promotions, in terms of actually we saw you in General Assembly opening 50, you know, main leaders talked first, so you didn't see for the first day any woman. So I'm just giving it as an example that, you know, if you want to ensure social justice equality, and you need to implement it internally yourself and be a model, you know, all organizations, all companies need to be a model. I love that sort of distinction or addition of the difference between rights and justice. They're both important, they're not the same. Melanie. Yeah, so, so within part because we've always been focusing on addressing injustices and giving a voice to minorities, but we also focus, for example, on climate issues and, and there you see that most of them are there's a technical approach. And what is interesting to see is how you can bring this justice approach in there is something that Ingers also saying, and, for example, we worked on deforestation, but if you looked at the problem then you saw that one of the things we need is to do is also work with the indignation and give them an alternative for another economic model. So we, we train them, school them, show them how to grow a kind berries, for example, to have an alternative to what they were doing before that. And if you would just look at legislation or compensation or technical rules, you would exclude this group and bring them in an even better position, saddle position. So this is an example or another one is is in Europe, when you see that lots of political leaders are telling people that there needs to be climate transformation that they need to use electrical cars that they subsidize those cars that they need to go to climate neutral homes or whatever, you see that there's a group of people who is not able to make that transformation and those are the ones that are poor and vulnerable. And so it's, it's having those challenges on a political level needs also not only to have a technical solution, also a social solution for those who need to make that transformation too.  So this is also something that we try to do is by creating citizen assemblies where people can also be part of the discussion on climate change. So there, yeah, my, my, my, my main point is that we need now to go from the call to action to really action so let's join all those groups where it really happens. I love that move from the call to action to action itself. That's a great note to end on. So thank you so much to anger me now Melanie for these really thoughtful answers. We're getting to see the results of our wivescribing now I love this very adorable monsters in the middle. Just a final note that the forums platform for global public goods will serve as a hub for collective action at the intersection of social justice and the SDGs. Accelerating policy innovation and action through the uplink COVID social justice challenge and cohorts, enabling industry communities of action defining and mainstreaming social justice with social impact and supporting inclusion of social and racial justice leaders into SDG action. So hopefully we can keep the conversation going there and just a final big thank you to our panelists and our live scriber I think there are a lot of really insightful and important points that came out over the course of the conversation. And this is a conversation that I think is only going to come more and more to the forefront in the coming months and years so thank you again to anger Mina and melody and thanks for everyone who tuned into the conversation to listen.


So guys I am back with another saint role video and today I'm going to showcase to you guys how you can get this amazing secret lung sword How's it going guys? My name's DP. Jane if you do enjoy the video leaving a like really helps out and if you'd like what you see I want to see more be sure to subscribe Okay, so the lung sword is a pretty potent weapon even well before it's upgraded Well, it's actually is guys. It's actually a weapon skin for the pick ass, but it acts like a whole new Weapon, okay, so how you get this is quite simple really you need to basically just do one of the The other ones we leave that negative feedback and you get the gang members of the marshals coming after you and you take them out It's basically just one of those and it's this one you can see right here on the map Now if you haven't got these on lunch yet, you need to first speak to the woman You'll see an on-screen now via this location you run up to this woman You talk to her for a quick second and then these side hustles will appear on your map upon you doing this go through this exact one Leave a one-star rating you want to do this on the hardest difficulty leave that one-star rating take out all the Enemies if you got an attack helicopter just makes things a lot easier as you see me doing Once you've taken or took them all out you simply are rewarded the weapon model the weapons You know, whatever you want to call it then guys you can either go to your nearest weapons shop Or if you already have the pick ax simply just customize it Upon you've been able to customize it guys to supply the visual mud to it And you have yourself this amazing looking lung sword and it really is that simple guys That's how you get this amazing lung sword is such a video was made upon a request So if you're watching it if you requested it and you're watching it I hope you enjoy it guys leaving a lot cool helps out if you're new around here want to see more sensual Be sure to subscribe and hopefully guys. I will see you on that next one