It's Wednesday, June the 10th, it's 11 o'clock. That could be only one thing, Trump week. I'm Tim Apachele, your host. And this week, like last week, and the week before last week, we have a whole list of things I know we're not gonna have enough time to get through. Some items that we've been on the national news discussing, everyone's seen it. But I'm gonna start right in with our guests. Good morning, everyone. Cynthia Sinclair and Stephanie Dalton. Unfortunately, Winston couldn't make it this morning. I'm gonna jump right in with Cynthia. I'm gonna jump in with you. And this item's called Jaw Dropping Moments this week. I'm gonna start off with the most jaw-dropping moment I thought, or the most obtuse moment that I saw Donald Trump engage with. And that is the comments he made about George Floyd. And he said the following. Hopefully George is looking down and saying, it's a great thing that's happening for our country. It's a great day for him. It's a great day for everybody. This is a great day in terms of equality. This is a lesson a week or week and a half away from the fact that we all witnessed a murderer on the streets in Minneapolis where a police officer's knee basically choked the life out of George Floyd. And no sooner than a week and a half later, excuse me, Donald Trump is boasting about how happy George Floyd is to see what's going on. Cynthia, am I missing something on this? No, you're not missing anything. And Kamala Harris came out with that comment afterwards. I was outraged. I think a million people were outraged when he said that. How dare he have the audacity to say something like that after the man is dead? Yeah, he's having a great day, he's dead. Was this putting fuel on the fire? Was this trying to inflame even further either cause more violence and property damage from the protesters? Or is this something that popped in his brain and he said it or was this planned? Well, he was reading from a script. So I think it was planned. They wrote it into the script. And I think what they were trying to do was say, look at all the great things that have happened because of his death. And I think that's sort of where they were trying to go with it, but they certainly missed the mark.  And that's what she, that was her response to the president. So I asked this question almost every week and the answer is usually the same but I'm gonna ask it again. Does this help Donald Trump with his base and the independence by making comments like this? Does this substantiate and kind of rekindle the racism that has a good part of his population that follow him? Does that help? I believe so, yes, absolutely. Because it minimizes his death. And so it minimizes the reason behind the protests. And at least that's what I think. Okay, well, good point. Stephanie, I'm gonna bring out jaw dropping comment number two and that was just recently where we also in Buffalo, New York where a 75 year old senior and he's well known in the protest circle but he walked up to a policeman and he was shoved rather, I thought it was rather brisk shove and he fell back and then he tripped on his heels and he went down to the pavement and basically his head hit the pavement. And we all saw that take place. We all saw that there was blood coming out of this gentleman's ear. And basically he went unconscious. And here's what Donald Trump said in a tweet. He said, the Buffalo protestor shoved by police by Antifa, he labeled the guy as Antifa, a provocateur, 75 years old. He fell harder than he was pushed. Could be a setup. So Stephanie, here we have Donald Trump who I know where he got this information from. He got it off a conspiracy website and that was later picked up by One America News. And of course he watches that a lot. He likes it because they're truly dedicated to whatever Trump says and does versus, Fox isn't always reporting what he wants them to report. So Fox sometimes is not his favorite list of news shows but One America News it now is and they picked this directly up from the Treehouse blog which is an ultra conservative, right wing conspiracy theory blog site. That's where our president's getting his information from. So that resulted in this tweet of his. What were your thoughts about this? Well, I like that Cynthia said minimizing because it's just so utterly disrespectful of anybody. And I think I saw it, I saw it early. I'm sure it wasn't before anybody else. So I don't remember when it happened because we're here, right? We're many hours later. But I saw that happen. And then I saw maybe the guy after one or two went by that actually turned and reached over and started to bend down and was drawn back. And I understand that that's been acknowledged now. Somebody has studied this tape to look at the sequence of events. And now this was a 75 year old, clearly. And obviously balance is not a strength at that time. So he was easy to tip on his own reconnaissance, much less whether anybody pushed him. I don't know that they did, but it's just that Donald Trump is just unattainive to anybody's existence other than his own. But what he's doing is he's launching into yet another conspiracy theory again about this. And again, I agree with Cynthia. He's minimizing the horrific moment we saw and witnessed on TV. He's minimized that by trying to throw in a conspiracy theory and to say that this whole thing was staged. I don't think blood running out of a gentleman's ear is a staged event. I just don't think so. And he's been in the hospital for well over a week. He was hurt. He was hurt. It was very scary and it went through my mind. Oh my gosh. Are we gonna now have this white elderly man issue arise? I mean, it's being attended to, but many questions ran through my mind. But aren't we getting bored with this whole conspiracy thing? It is the same thing over and over. Well, that's a really good point. And when the GOP senators are approached by reporters, specifically about this event where the 75 year old gentleman was pushed down, if you watch their responses, it looks like they were all in a hypnotic days. They all claimed, oh, I never saw it. I never saw the tweet. I never saw the video. I have no idea what you're talking about. Senator after Senator after Senator basically shuffled along the corridor with their hands in their pocket going, I don't know.  Well, I think that the commentators on CNN talked about that they're not engaging it. And this is just a continuance of the established behavior, primarily to keep Trump off there, but with the tweets and to ruin their chances of re-election. They're just holding firm to get... Holding on to whatever they can hold on to. Yeah, that's the point. It's irresponsible to do that. They're not fulfilling their role to represent us. And so I don't know how many of them are going home to hear what the people want, but this is not representation of Americans and it's certainly no reflection of our values. And also Lindsey Graham has been very, very quiet. They're issues like, you know, so why are they doing this? Do they think that they can get through this and come out whole on the other side? I think that is our question. Are we gonna forgive all this and go on and forget it when we move on? Well, I think that is the plan and the strategy is that you will forget it because there's been so much of this for the last three and a half years that you can't quite remember it all unless someone summarizes it and you read it on someone's newsletter or in the newspaper of all the things that Donald Trump has done in the last three and a half years because you can't remember it all. It's too much. That's a good point. Yeah, so anyway, I agree. In any way, what he says is minimizing the issue for the people experiencing it and maximizing the value of that issue for Donald Trump's purposes. So that's what's going on. That's the formula he's working and he's very expert at doing that. So he's definitely a PR guy. Okay, Stephanie, thank you for your comments on this. I wanna bounce back to you, Cynthia, on the same topic. What were your observations and to what degree does Donald Trump get away of trying to create a conspiracy and that this guy was an Antifa setup and it was all staged and planned? And then also comment a little bit about your observations about the GOP senators as they're being asked by reporters what they thought of the whole tweet from Donald Trump on this specific issue. Right, well, I heard a friend of the man who was injured. I heard a friend of his being interviewed on TV this morning who just talked about what a Christian peace-loving guy this guy was. And what the story goes anyway that's come out is that he was trying to return a cop's helmet that he had found on the ground and that's why he had walked over to them, right? Saw it live. I happened to be watching the TV that day and so I saw it live as it happened and the man fell and the blood instantly came pouring out from the back of his head and then started pouring out of his ear. And there was two officers. The one on the left is the one who shoved him and the officer on the right is the one who bent down to try to help him. And it looks like maybe it was a supervisor or something right behind him who pushed him away, said, keep going, keep going. And he started to call it in and started to call for the medic. So it's not like they didn't do anything but it was just- So did it appear to be staged to you? Oh goodness, no, absolutely. Oh goodness, no. I think most of America thought, okay, this is not staged. There's no way it's staged.  What's the optics of that for those that are not totally committed to Donald Trump? What are the optics on that? Well, it just shows that they are totally sick of pants that just play to Trump and that's all they ever do. And that's why they wouldn't speak about it. But Lisa Murkowski, we have a little bit of a dip. She's kind of starting to call things for being wrong. She's called this for being wrong. She called Trump for being wrong on this one.  They call that straddling the fence. It's been seen and done for the last three and a half years, not only by her but a few other senators. Okay, I'm gonna jump onto the title of the show and that is Trump, Law and Order President. Okay, as we know, he's come out at the Rose Garden just after they cleared by St. John's Church. He cleared them out with tear gas, rubber bullets, mounted police, National Guard. And he quoted that he's a friend of the protesters and he's gonna still be the Law and Order President. Well, guess what? This week, a lot of generals and a lot of them that were former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff came out and said, not so fast, not so fast. Specifically, let me just cite some of them. Colin Powell, we know who he is. Martin Dempsey, Mike Mullen, Richard Myers, Michael Hayden. Of course, General James Mattis, he came out very strongly. He's former Chief of Staff for Donald Trump and even the current Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, who was not ready to resign because he disagreed with the fact that Donald Trump is trying to militarize and use them against protesters and certainly many peaceful protesters. Your thoughts about all the generals coming out? Well, I was really glad to see that. I think General Kelly came out too. His most recent Chief of Staff came out and said it was wrong. Yeah, add his name to the list. That's correct, he did. Yeah, there's so many of them that came out against him that I'm hoping that's gonna make a difference because these are all very well-respected generals. These aren't just fly-by-night, oh, they're Democrats, partisan people. These are hardcore military men who made it to the level of general. And so I think that we really need to listen to what they have to say and hopefully his base, or at least the people that are on the fence about it, will listen also.  Well, he tried to do the Insurrection Act of 1807 or whatever it was. That's what he tried to pull. Yeah, and that's what he tried to pull, but even that was not allowed because nobody would approve it and he can't do it all by himself. Well, he did ship them in to Washington, D.C. They came in by truck, they were ready to go. They can go to D.C. because they don't have an actual governor, right? Because it's like a territory, right? Yeah. And so it's not governed the exact same way, which is why he could get away with doing it in Washington, but he can't just do it anywhere. Yeah, Stephanie, let me ask you a question. Thank you, Cynthia, thank you very much. Stephanie, let me ask you a question. We know that Donald Trump, the last we have for years, we've seen the pattern of he runs up to a border on something and he pushes the law and he pushes on the Constitution to see where that flexible boundary snaps back or not snap back on him. Is this a case where Donald Trump wanted to see what he could get away with by trying to order in military to quell a peaceful protest, a citizens protest? Was this one of his examples of him trying to test the boundaries so that the next time he wants to use it, he'll see how much pushback he gets or doesn't get? I don't think it's testing anything. He's doing what he wants to do. It's the 82nd Airborne people that were waiting outside the District of Columbia's lines. I guess they were in Virginia. That's where most of the airplanes come in. But yeah, I think according to Muriel Bowser, this wasn't anything that was legal to do in the district which she's governor, mayor, county, everything because of the circumstances of it. But it functions as an ordinary city. And we in Hawaii ought to be sensitive to it because we get pushed into some crazy Pacific archipelago distant place in people's minds when we're a real state and but DC's not a real state only because it doesn't have a representative's but it does everything else that the state does. They pay taxes. It definitely pays taxes, you know? So this is the ticket. Anyway, I think that he's doing what he wants to do and he would have done it if he could have. So I'm not getting that it's testing anymore. I don't know that he ever tested. He's just like a bullet. He just goes forward and somehow he's impeded by circumstances or somebody grabbing. I mean, so what he did was outrageous and an insult according to Muriel Bowser, she's the one that fought this back. I mean, her mayorship is now a real tough gig because she's had to get on the phone with him. She's been upfront with him face to face. And remember, there were some consequences of this. She painted a bunch of stuff going down to the street, to the White House that isn't all pleasing to Mr. Trump. You mean Black Lives Matter, that yellow demarcation on the streets? And she confiscated the Lafayette Park that is now called not the French general that helped us who was really helpful and probably saved her grits. But anyway, it's Black Lives Matter Park. So I think this woman is stepping out. It's interesting. I don't know if there's gonna be an impact or an effect of this, but she's looking very strong and in a suitable manner. She's not making a big deal out of it, but she's saying it authoritatively and out of the base of power she has. Well, I brought up my question for a reason because there's a lot of folks and I'm not gonna quantify exactly who's who. Bill Maher comes to mind and there's a lot of people that believe that Donald Trump's not gonna leave the White House even if he's not re-elected. And so the question is, is this a run-up test to see, well, I'm not leaving and I'm gonna use the military to make sure I don't have to leave.  He was talked down from it by one of his guests. I can't, I think it was the reason. Michael Moore tried to talk him off the ledge on that one too, but you know. But it's something that a lot of people actually scratched their head about would he try to pull that? Oh, he'll pull a lot of stuff. That one could be. But he'll just barrage everybody with everything that was wrong with the election. And in the meantime, running up to it, he's trying to do everything to interfere with the Georgia problems and the Wisconsin problems.  That's a fraud, yeah. Cynthia, excuse me. That's committed a lot of fraud. He's a Republican person, but anyway, okay. Right. Cynthia, you know, I've listened to you for quite a while now, well over a year and a half, and you're concerned that Donald Trump's gonna try to pull a shenanigans on the election.  And basically, is he, you know, setting the stage for potential violence in the street if the election doesn't go his way? And he starts calling it fraud. And I've been cheated out of my reelection as president of the United States. Does it concern you that he does use the military or the Insurrection Act of 1807 as a test case or as maybe a warm-up? Does that come into your mind?  It's been in my mind just because I know the man and the way he is, you know. So, and then, yeah, Bill Maher, Trevor Noah, there's a lot of people talking about it. And think about it, Michael Cohen- Is this comedy or is this serious? Well, Michael Cohen was not joking when he said it. You know, to the Congress, he said it.  He's not gonna leave peacefully. So there's a couple of things that I think are important to think about here. And one of them is that when Ivanka Trump went over to China and got all those patents, she thought patents for election machines, voting machines, right? So where'd they go? Where have they been placed? Do they get placed in Georgia? And are they placed in the ones where, right now, the reason some districts in Georgia don't have any weight at all or an hour and some have, you know, six and seven hour weights. So is that by design or is that by accident? I have a lot of questions and I don't understand why a media, we don't have some New York Times editors or journalists going out there and researching this and finding out. I haven't been able to find out much as to where they went. But we do know that this new Dominion voting machines company is kind of a small company. There's not a lot you can find out about it. So as I was trying to find out more about where did her machines go and just exactly what's going on. So I kind of think that the reason he's against voting by mail is it's not as easy for him to cheat. There'll be a paper ballot. So maybe, you know, I don't know, compromise and have like we do here in Hawaii, you have a paper ballot and, you know, an electronic thing, but it's a paper ballot. So I wish every state had paper ballots. That'd be my inquiry. Alrighty, I'm gonna switch gears here. While I have you here, Cynthia, Roger Goodell from the NFL has reversed a long policy of, you know, not really endorsing taking a knee and he has reversed himself explicitly on that point and apologizing. I wish we would have listened to our team members, our players and has apologized profusely about it. Then of course, Donald Trump. Donald Trump had words to say about that, but this kind of sparked up from Drew Brees, who's the quarterback for the New Orleans and he said the following, I realize this is not an issue about the American flag. We can no longer use the flag to turn people away or distract them from the real issues that face our black communities. Donald Trump then immediately quoted or tweeted, old glory is to be revered, cherished and flown high. We should be standing up straight and tall, ideally with a salute or a hand on heart. There are other things you can protest, but not over the great American flag, no kneelings. So Donald Trump once again gets to wrap himself up in the American flag, completely changed the narrative about what it is and why Kaepernick took the knee, you know, a year and a half ago, why he did that in the first place was to protest the brutality of some police forces against the black community. Your thoughts? Well, I'm glad that he has been exonerated because he needed to be. And what he- Well, Roger Goodell didn't say his name specifically. No, he didn't, but I think he should have. And there's a lot of talk of even giving him a tryout to see if he can, I saw him being interviewed, Goodell was being interviewed and he said, well, I think he's been out of play for too long and Bobby's kind of trying to hedge on it. But there's some other teams that have talked about giving him another chance and taking off the thing because he was blackball forever. And so now they're gonna maybe give him another chance to play, which I think is right. But you know, I lived in the South for a long time.  Now, if they go to a sports arena, they will stand for the National Anthem. But right around all that time that all this was happening, I was out there visiting and I was in a restaurant, a sports bar and the National Anthem came on.  So I got on the, they have a little microphone there at this place, I got on the microphone and I gave them all a bad time for not standing up. You know, you want to claim that it's wrong for someone to kneel, yet you'll sit here and you will keep on eating and keep on making noise while the anthem's playing. Well, they don't want to spill any mustard or Coca-Cola on their pants. What can I say? That's right. All right, Stephanie, your thoughts on the NFL reversal, Roger Goodell and his statements and then Donald Trump's desperate attempt to reignite this issue and call it all about disrespect to the American flag. Yeah, I'll just raise it up to that level of incitement and onto another distraction which is certainly there's gonna be a move to stop playing the national anthem at sports events. So they brought that up and then I started thinking, well, why do we do that? So maybe there'll be a discussion about why are we even using it at sports events, okay? So I mean, that's a whole nother pathway we're going down here. Well, part of that is because the US military got a contract with the NFL to start broadcasting their recruitment commercials during breaks in play. And that was never the case before. And only until the recent years did the US military get an entryway and I'm sure they're paying very well to the NFL for it to broadcast the commercials and basically pump up patriotism to equal football. Yeah. Well, I mean, I think this is open now. So we're gonna be hearing a lot more about this and I would say perhaps that event is in jeopardy but it is a place for people to do what Kaepernick did. And he's been so punished for that and it has never been clear enough why they were punishing him so badly. But now I see the sacred ground of the flag and then the using of that to distract and to incite and to do conspiracy and to have all of these other things going on. That is what is the game here. And I wish we went, I mean, hopefully we can get through this without getting bogged down in it and without changing our cherished practices and what we're doing. Okay, we got less than a minute left. Stephanie, go ahead. What is the problem of two questions? I want the worry about how to get him out of the White House, okay? I want that problem so much. Well, the problem is if I get everyone you know to register and vote, that's the answer. Okay, we're down to seconds here. What's your prediction for the coming week? What do you think's on the horizon here? And I'll, a short answer please and I'll ask Cynthia too. Oh, for me, what's coming? I think we're going somewhere on the national anthem, okay? And that will be born more opportunity. In addition to that, I've started watching all of the shows because I don't want to get just stuck with a certain line of shows. But I noticed on the ones I had been watching, even the CNN I think, but they're playing Trump commercials, okay, for president. And one of the ways it comes across, they're beautifully done and you would have no notion that there were any issues. Yeah, I agree. Okay, Cynthia, I got a cut from you, Stephanie. Cynthia, your last quick thoughts about what's coming up this week. Oh gosh, the COVID stuff is gonna come back. We've had all these, we just opened up, so we're gonna see rises from that and then we're gonna also see rises from these protests. And so I'm gonna be curious to find out how long these protests will go. What is it, 15 days or something they've been going every day straight? So I'll be anxious to see where they go from here. All right, Cynthia, thank you so much. Thank you for joining us on Trump Week. Stephanie Dalton, thank you so much for your comments. They're always great ones. I wanna say thank you, we'll see you next Wednesday. I'm Tim Appachelle, the host for Trump Week, Wednesday, 11 o'clock, Trump Week, aloha.


The best revenge against the narcissist. You may feel like the narcissist defeated you. As though they gained an advantage over you. As though they were too strong for you to control. And then they just began a new happy life at the end. They rode off into the sunset after they wasted your time. After they abused you. After they lied to you. And made you commit to something that had no future. They tried to trap you in a marriage. They tried to trap you with children. They tried to prevent you from escaping. But at some point they know their time is up. And then they move on to their next situation. Something that they already had lined up. You're left feeling like you were tricked and deceived. You were taken advantage of. But they set up the environment. In a way where you can't do anything bad or unpleasant to them. Even after they have treated you unfairly. You can't retaliate. And then they're just sitting back. And laughing at you. Because there's nothing you can do about it. But you have to understand. That they're not moving on to anything good. They're not moving on to bigger and better things. They're just running away from a situation that is no longer saving them. You started to figure them out. So they're trying to get away. They're trying to escape the consequences of their actions. But they usually end up running into another situation that also isn't serving them. Which they then portray as being better than what it actually is. It's just an act. They might show pictures and videos of them with someone else. As though they're having a great time. They usually like to do it at Christmas, New Year or near Valentine's Day. And it always has to appear like it's something bigger and better than it was with you. To make you feel like you're missing out on something. They want people to see that they haven't gotten lower in amount or level. They've moved on to something better. As though they got plenty of money. It's just an act. But this is how you can get revenge. By being mindful that they are going to try to attack you psychologically. They are going to try to affect you. They will go all out. To manage the perceptions of the outside world. To show you and everyone else that they've moved on to something better. To show people that they didn't take a loss. But if you pay attention to the details in these pictures and videos. You may see something. That reveals that they're not getting lots of money. They're not doing better without you. It will reveal to you that it's all an act. But usually when you're going through this. You're not paying attention to the details. You're homed in on whatever narrative they're trying to feed to you. Because you want answers. You want to find the next part of the story. You want to see what they're up to. And you see that they're doing all these things now. That they never wanted to do with you. Until it leaves you feeling bad. It leaves you feeling sad and depressed. Because you're not paying attention to the details. You're getting caught up emotionally. So you don't see all of the things they bought from the bargain store. You're caught up in all of the things. That follow the narrative of them doing it big. You're not paying attention to the details. And seeing that they're not really doing big things. They're just trying to display an image. Because they want to hurt your feelings. And when you're seeing those pictures and videos of them after they've moved on. It gets you caught up emotionally. When really you need to identify. That they were never doing that when they were with you. So how can someone who did everything with such little effort and care. Move on to another situation. And then they're very healthy and successful. And doing all this stuff. It doesn't work that way. It's all an act. It's an illusion. They haven't really got the money for anything. It's just for their image. It's designed to manage people's perceptions of them. Because they assume that you're still emotionally attached to them. After you invested so much of your time, energy and money. So now they're creating this false appearance with someone else. But you should be wondering how can they move on so quickly. If they were so deeply invested in you. If you were so important to them. How could they move on so quickly. So what you should do is ignore it. Ignore everything they're doing. Don't look at their social media. Don't look at their pictures or videos. Because if you do that. It just gives them fuel to continue doing what they do. When you do that.  Don't play their game. Don't try to outdo them. Don't try to outsmart them. Just be silent. Be quiet. Don't even respond. Because they will notice that you're not calling them. They will notice that you're not responding to what they're doing. They will notice that you're not even saying anything bad. And it will get to them. Because as long as they see some form of emotional activity. They enjoy that. They want you to see them. They want you to see that they're so much happier without you. But it's all fake. It should reveal to you. That they're just trying to hurt you. Because no one gets that happy that quickly. They're just saying that to hurt you. So don't say anything. Don't respond. There is power in silence. So move on and be silent. Take some time to work on yourself. Because that is the best revenge. To be the best person you can be. To achieve what you always wanted to achieve. To become successful. And they're not going to like it. Especially when you no longer have any respect for them. Because they can feel when you no longer get attached to them. They can feel when you don't even care. If they're with someone else. And that is often when they will try to come back. When they see that you're doing better without them. And that leads away at them. And that should be revealed to you. By how they're always trying to get your attention. They're always trying to get a reaction out of you. Because there is nothing worse for a narcissist. Than when their target is no longer thinking about them. When their target no longer cares. That's like death to a narcissist. Thank you for watching. I hope this video resonates with you. Please like, comment, share and subscribe. If you would like to donate. By paypal link is in the video description. Coaching inquiries. You can email me at coachingatnarksfiver.co.uk. Thank you for watching and I'll talk to you soon.


A co-asset man has pleaded guilty to two counts of animal cruelty counts in Minnesota's ninth judicial district court. Forty-three-year-old Stephen Lee Michele agreed to the plea agreement on Monday. We first told you about the case involving Michele last December. Neighbors accused Michele of shooting their cats, and according to the criminal complaint in the case, Michele told investigators that he shot at the cats with the intent to kill them. Michele will be sentenced on April 30th in the Itasca County Courthouse. A victim statement will be presented to the court before the sentencing. Two counts Michele has pleaded guilty to are misdemeanors. Michele had also been charged with one felony count of mistreat torture animal resulting in death, but that count was dismissed as part of the plea agreement. If you enjoyed this segment of Lakeland News, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Lakeland PBS.


Sir, today's Supreme Court slammed the BJP former spokesperson over the allegations which made under her comments and Supreme Court said that you are the responsible for whatever happened in that time and many other places to know. Thank you. Yeah. How Congress is looking at it, how are these... Well, look, it's... Yes, of course the Supreme Court has said this. Yes, true. But the atmosphere in the country has been created by the ruling dispensation. It is not the person who has made the comment. It is the Prime Minister. It is the Home Minister. It is the BJP and the RSS that has created this environment in the country. This environment of anger, this environment of hatred and frankly the creation of this environment in the country is a anti-national act. This is against the interest of India. It is against the interest of the people of India and it is completely wrong. And it is going to lead to tragedy. As the Congress party, we build bridges between people. We build bridges between communities. We bring people together. So this is what we are seeing in the country, what is being done in the country today by the RSS and the BJP. And the violence you see here, this is completely against our philosophy. We don't believe in solving problems with hatred and anger. That's why also I am saying that the youngsters here have got excited. Fine, they have a slightly different ideology than us. We don't appreciate the fact that they have broken my office, but we'll fix our office. It's not going to stop working just because they've come here and they've broken it. We'll fix it, we'll make it back to normal. But we should be forgiving towards them.


My name is Deirdre Ford. I'm a councillor on Cork City Council in Southern Ireland. Our government and health agencies have put together extensive preparations to safeguard the lives and incomes of our people at this grave time. At local level we are working very closely together to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on our precious communities. My European colleagues and friends, please obey all advice to stay safe. We are united in diversity and stronger together.


My name is Ms. Shayna, and I'm a children's librarian at the Long Beach Public Library. If you haven't signed up for our summer reading program, dig deeper, then go ahead and go to longbeach.beanstack.org, so you can start earning prizes for the reading that you're already doing this summer. And if you are signed up, wonderful. Don't forget to earn credit for watching today's video by entering the code dinosaur into your activities tab on your Beanstack account. Today, we're gonna be doing a science experiment with frozen dinosaur eggs. I can't wait to get started. So here's what you'll need. You are going to need some dinosaurs. You can find these little tiny, tiny dinosaurs, sometimes at a dollar store or something like that. So you'll need some of these. You'll need a couple of balloons. But if you don't have these handy, you could also just use a cereal bowl or any kind of container that'll hold water in your freezer. You'll need some warm water. So maybe about two cups of water microwave for about a minute and let it cool.  And if you'd like to try using a little bit of salt, we can see what kind of effect that'll have on the frozen eggs. And if you have like a little turkey basher or a little dropper like this, that's gonna help you put the warm water into the tray, which is the last item you'll need today. You'll need some kind of container that can hold melting ice and contain water. So let's begin. First, you're gonna need to take a dinosaur and put it inside of a balloon. If you have a helper, this is a little bit easier because they could hold the balloon open for you while you put the dinosaur in there. But I found that I can do it by myself if I put one, a couple of, like two fingers inside the balloon and then I take my little dinosaur and I'm gonna lay the dinosaur on the outside of the balloon and then I'm gonna pull the balloon inside out over that little dinosaur. So he's tucked inside and just keep pulling him through until it starts to resemble a balloon again. So we're turning that balloon sort of inside out and it'll still work if it's turned inside out like that. So if you can get a helper to help you though or a grown up, that might be useful. So I'll show you that again. Open up the balloon, put your fingers in there, take a dinosaur, put them on the outside of the balloon and then pull the balloon over the dinosaur inside out. And be careful because those little tails are really sharp and you wanna check your balloon for any holes before you try to fill it with water. Otherwise you might end up with a big mess but science experiments are for being messy, right? Okay, this one doesn't wanna go in as easily. That's okay, I think I got it. Okay, two, two dinosaurs in a balloon. So the smaller the dinosaur probably gonna be the better and if you don't wanna deal with the balloons you can just put a dinosaur into a container of water like that and just freeze the whole container of water. It won't look like an egg but that's okay. Again, so we're gonna stretch the balloon open. You know what, I'm just gonna try dropping him in there because he's nice and tiny. So look, I was able to do it without turning it inside out. So once you have your dinosaurs and your balloons you're gonna go fill them with water at a sink. Okay, so we're gonna fill up our balloons at a sink with a faucet like this. Just like you're filling up a water balloon you're gonna put that over your faucet, hold it tight, put some water in there really slowly until it's about the right size to fit in the palm of your hand. Let out a little bit of the air and then just tie that balloon secure and you can toss it in the freezer overnight or for a few hours. A little bit bigger if you want. You might need to have a grown up to help you with this part. I recommend having a water balloon fight with dinosaurs inside of those balloons. No way, that would be painful. All right, then you're gonna go ahead and put those in the freezer. Once you've pulled your frozen balloons out of the freezer and put them in a water safe container it's now time to remove the balloon and start excavating our frozen dinosaur eggs.  Cut the balloon away from the ice. It's gonna be very slippery and you don't wanna lose that dinosaur egg. There you can see it, there's a little dinosaur hiding in that frozen egg. Next dinosaur egg, this one's a little bit smaller and look, surprise. I actually snuck some food coloring into this one. So if you wanna make some different color eggs just put a couple of drops of food coloring inside of your balloon before you fill it with water.  So yeah, when you use balloons you get this nice egg shape. There's our last dinosaur, see him inside? So now it's time to figure out how are we gonna get them out of here? My hands are already getting a little bit wet from the water, they're already starting to melt a little bit. So here's where we can start experimenting. We can grab a chopstick and a little hammer here and maybe try to crack them open. Make sure you wear some safety goggles for this part. And if that becomes too tedious you can try to start using some warm water. So I microwaved two cups for two minutes and it's hot but it might be a little too hot for a young child so make sure you let it cool. But for an older child this might be okay. And just try spraying some hot water on there. Start watching the dinosaur melt right out of that egg. So some of the questions you can be asking while you're doing this is which way is the fastest to excavate the dinosaur out of its egg? And it looks like that water is, look it's putting some really nice divots into the ice there. And one thing we didn't talk about was how dinosaurs are reptiles which means they're oviparous. Oviparous means they come from an egg. So I can see a little foot sticking out here and I might start chipping away again. So it'd be a fun activity to do maybe outside in the summertime if you don't want to get water everywhere much more luck just using hot water. We can talk about how water is a liquid and when it is cold enough, 33 degrees Fahrenheit or zero degrees centigrade then it freezes and becomes a solid. And by using hot water on the ice we're turning that back into liquid. So a little lesson on the different states of matter. Something else we can try to speed this along would be to use salt. So I have a little bowl of salt here. I'm gonna sprinkle some of that on my ice. And you know how he said water freezes at 33 degrees Fahrenheit? Well, when salt is added to water, it decreases, you can see, this is a fun way to spend a lot of time talking about how to get these dinosaurs out of here. And you could have a race to see who can rescue their dinosaur the fastest. Or you could, your experiment can be which material or which tool is the best for freeing the dinosaurs from their eggs. And I am gonna say that hot water is the best way. Cause look at how free that dinosaur is looking there. He's almost out. And maybe if I just give him a little bit of a nudge. Nope, he's not ready yet. So we're gonna keep adding. I think the salt really did a good job there of making the ice melt faster. That's what I'm noticing is that the ice is melting faster when I put salt on there. Kind of like disappears. Look right where the salt was. I get one of these dinosaurs free. Oh, there we go. Got it. There we go. Which material worked best or which tool worked best to free the dinosaur from the egg? Was it the hammer and chisel or chopstick? Was it warm water? Was it salt? It was kind of a combination of all three. But I personally feel like the warm water did the best job. And then combined with the salt, it was really fast melting that ice. So this is just a simple experiment you can do at home. Hopefully with materials you just have laying around the house. Thanks for joining us today. Don't forget to sign up for summer reading at longbeach.beanstack.org. And don't forget to enter today's code dinosaur into your activities tab. Thanks for watching. Bye.


Governor Gardiner Basseke of Edo State, on Saturday holidays, the first executive governor of the state chief John Odege Oyegu with the commission of a civil service training institute, the John Odege Oyegu Public Service Academy, which he named after the elder statesman. Governor Basseke at the commissioning of the academy said the institute was positioned to transform civil public service delivery and bridge knowledge gaps in pursuit of excellence. Was founded to strengthen the public service institution through capacity building. Many scholars argue that we will not go very far until we have strengthened our institutions. Edo State is going digital. That's the direction the world has taken. Today we're talking about AI, artificial intelligence. We're talking about the Internet of Things. We cannot go back to where it used to be. Therefore, Edo State has decided to go digital and our public service is leading the way. We're investing in extensive digital infrastructure as we are now on the verge of completing the lane of 2,000 kilometers of fiber optics across Edo State. Civil servants to work well. There must be a connection between the political head and the service. And the way you can deliver the policies of government to the citizens is actually through the civil servants. Now, the public servants are those who would implement certain aspects of the things that come out from government policies. It's insane and fatical that today I am very proud. Very proud that my name has been associated with an institution of such intense possibilities. An institution like I said in prayer that will almost certainly serve as a lighthouse. Thank you very much.


So, today I want to talk about how to start a private one-to-one football training business in the UK. Every day I'm either speaking with coaches who have private training businesses here in the UK that do that specialising in one-on-one training and apart from just speaking to coaches also I work with coaches, consult with coaches who currently run private training businesses. So what I'm going to share with you are three very simple things you need before starting your private training business here in the UK. Training is becoming very, very common and very, very popular here in the UK and for a number of reasons. Number one, it creates a personal type of experience for the client. Number two, you can work with the client on specific areas of the game which perhaps in a team or a club environment can be difficult and the third one is as a coach and as a business owner you can work with multiple players or clients from clubs all around your local area. So being a private trainer and especially working with one-to-one clients, you don't need to specifically just focus on one club or one team. You can open yourself up to working with several athletes at several clubs or several teams. But three things I want to share with you today are three things that you need before you even start working with clients. So the first thing is experience and qualifications. Now as a coach myself, I've been in this type of industry for a very long time. At this stage, I've been in the industry 13 plus years. So I've worked with players from multiple clubs and multiple abilities and something I've realised and I've noticed is that you need to have experience. So when you go into a one-to-one environment with an athlete or with a client, you need to demonstrate to that client that you have experience, that you have knowledge of the game. So first thing is get experience somewhere, right? So this could be training at a local club, this could be volunteering your time to work with individuals on a voluntary basis to try and build that experience, build that confidence or sign up and register onto courses. Education is also important because when your clients ask you for a background in the game, so what's your experience, what's your history in the game? You can provide them with experience, your coaching experience and also your qualifications that you've done so that you can demonstrate to that client that you are a qualified personal trainer. Second thing you need and the second thing is something that a lot of coaches do ignore and that is setting up your business legally. In the UK, there's two ways normally personal trainers set up their business. The first one is through self-employed where you have to fill out a self-assessment for your taxes and the second way is setting up a private limited company where you put yourself as the director of that company, right? Now I don't want to go into too much detail about the difference, the advantages or disadvantages of both because that's something I will then later cover in an upcoming video. But normally those are the two ways private trainers here in the UK set up their business. They either go self-employed or they set up a private limited company where they put themselves as the director of that company. Now the third and probably one of the most important is setting up a payment system so you can get paid from clients. Now in the UK currently 97% of all private trainers function on cash in hand, right? Most private trainers that I speak to and I've worked with either transition from the cash in hand model into an online subscription or they simply are happy with that cash in hand model. So they're receiving cash for their services, right? So that pay per hour model, which is something I'm going to talk about in upcoming videos. But when you start receiving money from clients, you need to find a way in order to be able to track all the money that is coming into your business. So first way is you need to set up a business account so you can have all your payments coming in to that account and you can track what's coming in and what's coming out your business. Most coaches don't function this way, right? Most coaches what they do is they just have a personal account and they receive cash in hand, right? And that's usually at the field. Now what happens is when you receive cash in hand, there's a temptation to spend that money straight away.  But ultimately, if you want to build a successful business and if you want to track what's coming in and out, you need to set up an account where you can have everything registered that you can see what is coming in each month, what is coming in each week and what is going out. Also when it comes to doing your taxes, it's going to become a lot more easier to track what is coming in as a profit and what's being spent on as a business expense, right? Because there's a lot of tax advantages that when you spend or when you buy things for your business, you can write off on the profits that you've made, right? So three main things are number one, you've got to make sure that you've got experience and you've got coaching qualifications before you start working with any clients on a one to one basis. The second one is you have to make sure you set up your business legally so that you can do things by the book, right? If you're just running your business as a cash in hand and you've got no proper business set up, ultimately, you don't have a business. You have more what I like to say is a hobby. You're just doing it as a hobby.  And the third and final one, which is probably the most important, is once you start receiving income from working with your clients, you need to make sure that you have a payment system in place so you can receive payments through that system, right? So this ideally should be an online payment system. So a system where parents can pay you online and they can set up a monthly subscription with you so that you aren't receiving or having to have or handle a cash in hand every single week at your training sessions, right? Something that is common is private trainers when they get out to the field and they're doing five to eight training sessions, private sessions back to back is once they get that money, there's a possibility that if all your clients are paying you cash in hand, then you might lose some of that money during your session, right? You might lose it either it might drop or if the weather's not great, the money can be damaged and then ultimately you've lost some of the income from that day. So what we want to do is we want to transition you into an online payment system where parents can pay you online and that money goes straight into your business account where then you can track it and everything is tracked so that when it comes down to doing your taxes, you know what is coming in and what is coming out of the business, right? If you need more help, if you are a private trainer, you're based in the UK and you're thinking of starting a one-to-one training business or you currently have a one-to-one training business, but you're looking to get more organized, implement better systems or you want to scale and grow your business, reach out to me. My email is makemoneycoachingsports.com or if you find the first link in the description of this video, you can set up a free 15 to 20 minute call with me where we can jump on a Zoom call. I can answer any questions you might have with regards to your business and taking your business to the next level. Okay, thank you for watching and I'll see you on the next one.


Yeah, I usually do that because it's easier for me to do it myself. Hi everyone. So my name you already got. I've been doing open source for quite a bit. Started with some tools and then Linux, Debian and Postgres. And those years are all when I really started doing work as a developer, not started using it. But nowadays most of the time I spent working for a company that does only open source. That's where we are here. And that's why I'm so eager to point out that the Windows desktop isn't mine. Everything is open source here in the company. As you can see, we do all the services for all of open source and we have offices in the US, in Europe and in India looking to expand further east as well. So that's it for the marketing for now. Let's go to the real topic. So a while back I looked up some numbers of where and how is open source used in corporate IT. You can see on the left side it's MTAs, message transport agents. Right side is IMAP servers. And you can easily see almost everything is open source. So here the green one is Microsoft and there the which one is it? The yellow one is Microsoft. Always the first proprietary software in terms of size. You see easily three fourths of the whole market is open source. And then in databases, no that's a web server. Database comes next. Web server the same thing. We don't really know what Google has. Anyone here from Google? Who could tell us? No. But we have to assume it's based on some open source thing. So again the Microsoft thing in green is the first one and we can have more than three fourths. And yeah that's the database side. It's slightly different. But still you can see all the MySQL side, the orange one is open source. You have with Oregon and Microsoft SQL server you have two big tools that are close source proprietary. But still Postgres and MySQL and SQLite have a lot of market share. Interesting enough SQLite has more than sidebase and Informix isn't even showing anymore. Anyway so we could say yes we arrived. That's it. Open source is there and we could actually make the whole story short and I could send you over so you can start the next presentation. Actually I did that. I added this slide or added this way of presenting it after I was on the presentation where everyone was late. They were running really over and my presentation was the last one before lunch and my guy organizing the session said so the best thing you can do is get on stage and tell everyone to have a nice lunch. So I figured it might make sense to have a point where I can stop. Okay so let's have a look at why and how it works out. What happens is or happened is companies have realized that there are bigger advantages to open source than just licenses. Way back when everyone was talking about the open source license and the license fee on the proprietary side as the big difference. But nowadays it's not the big topic anymore. There's a study going around like once a year called the future of open source survey. And these are the top three points that came out of it as the question was what's the business reason? What's your reason for using open source software? And you can see yeah people like flexibility more than that they like the freedom from vendor lock in and most of it like the quality of the software which has gone up from fifth place in 2011. So essentially it means open source software got better. Let's have a quick look at all three of these. Let's start with the flexibility. Anyone here old enough to know this thing? Except me. Yeah I solved mine way back. Anyway just for the younger forks to explain this bread box is a Commodore 64. It was a revolution back then because it had 64 kilobytes of main memory. The prior model had 3.5. I mean that's a huge difference right? But just as compared to modern or PC hardware everything was solidly soldered. Just compare for create a picture in your mind that the CPU is your P system. The memory is the database. Let's say the audio is the web server and the graphics is your eShop system. Now you get into the situation of you want wanting to upgrade something like I am not satisfied with 64 kilobytes. I want 128. You cannot simply just exchange the RAM or you have to pick out the soldering iron and create more on it. It's a big hassle. And the same happens on the software side. There are a lot of situations where especially in the proprietary side where you have interdependencies so you cannot upgrade as easily as you would like. On the open source side though that would never happen. Never. Because worst case you can just recompile the software in a way you want it to be. So you can always get what's the best for your environment out of the open source. And at the same time, well this is a modern system right? And it's your choice what you prefer. This more or less relates to open source. At the same time you get the advantage of being open. Now everyone might say yeah, open like in open source. We got that. But it's not about the source code alone. It's about the formats, the standards used and so on. And as I already mentioned before in one of my other presentations, there are already files out there that nobody can read anymore. Not that long ago, I mean 20, 25 years ago, let's say the company went bust, the format was lost from the company that created it and nobody can read them anymore. Now assume you have the legal obligation to store your files for 50 years. You cannot do it. You don't know what will happen in 50 years. Not even for big companies. So the only option is everything has to be open. You have to be able to create new software to read it. As for the quality, so I guess everyone who was in computer science has seen these before, the standard software development model called the waterfall model. Frankly, I hate it because it's a one-way street. And what happens is, let's have a look at a real waterfall. For those who don't know, that's Niagara Falls, which is quite a bit of a famous waterfall. And you see what the waterfall produces. It's all the mist there, right? And the interesting thing is mist in English is this. The German language, my native tongue, has also the same word, mist, written exactly the same. But it means something else.   And that holds for software because there is no way to go back.  Yes, you can report a bug.  They put it into the ticket system. And that's different in open source. You can always talk to us as in communities. You can work with us on changes, on features, and so on. Collaboration is the key point there. Next topic, well, last topic in that slide was security. It used to be a liability in a lot of people's minds. Now it's become number two on the decision maker's list before costly. Because people realize, and there are studies that prove it, that open source, it might not be inherently more safe or safer and more secure, but it's at least in the open. You can see how good it is and how safe and secure it is. And you can even work on the fixes yourself. So if you have to make a decision to deploy some software in a security environment, you can check beforehand, is there a problem with this software? Is there something I have to do?  And that doesn't happen in open source. So I'm kind of with a list because of the timing issue we have. I don't want to read the whole list. The two points that, well, the one point that is really important to me here is think of open source as bespoke standard software. It's commodity, but you still can get it to the point where it exactly fits your need because it's so adaptable. And it's still part of the standard. So the next time you do an upgrade, you don't have to worry about your changes. It's a part of the source tree. It's part of the commodity now. And the other one is of course no license course because we had that before, but it's not what you're really looking at. What you're really looking at as a company is total cost of ownership. When you see where the costs come from, you see that reducing the license cost to zero reduces your total cost of ownership by 7%. It's nice, but it's not exactly a great number. And even that is not really true because you still have to buy support somewhere unless you want to do it all by yourself. So you get more savings potential in the training and downtime department, for example, or in the hardware department. Open source tends to run on older hardware or smaller hardware. You might not need that much training because the way it works, you train people up front and then it works better. And it's more reliable. You have more features that you can enable. You can do more with it so you have less downtime. But the huge difference here is obviously staff, people. So there are a lot of things that make it cheaper in the whole situation. And there are a lot of studies that show it makes it cheaper. But I cannot do anything about it. Some people just don't believe that for whatever reason. So let's forget about it. Just believe it. It's cheaper in the long run. But you also have to get there first. So you have to do migration. And for that, you have to go in and invest money, invest time by consulting whatever to get the migration done. And also have to buy training and stuff like this because when you get to complete new software, people need to learn about that new software. The way it's measured is you check the return on investment. So what you want to see is how long does it take me to recover the money I invested on the migration. And we did some studies there by checking migrations we did as a company. So it's not representative. And we made it like, but it's a simplified calculation. Instead of using the license fee as a yearly fee, which is normally is we broke it down to a monthly fee to give you a better idea what happened. And we had a look at a lot of different scenarios and a lot of different software pieces that we migrated. Could be database, could be monitoring, could be other DevOps stuff. We combined them all and created this sheet that on the bottom shows you the amount the migration cost and on the left hand the x-axis shows you the month it took to recover and to get the full return on investment. Meaning no matter which one we looked at, it never took anyone longer than a year to actually make money from the migration. And that to me is a fairly simple calculation. Usually, depending on the size of the company, people are looking at ROIs of two to three years. That's why they make a decision. If it's longer, they probably don't do any investment. But that's so short. You see it in the same fiscal year. It should be fairly easy, but okay. Anyway, back to the migration itself. There are a couple points you should make sure to take care of when you do a migration. This is not very special to open source nor fairness. Most of these points are general points for migrations. Why is the M so small? I don't know. It's not because I wanted to have a small M. It should be a large one. From personal experience, I have to say don't forget the redundancies. They cost additional money, right? But you need it. And the other one is please, pretty please don't create any temporary or isolated solution. When my wife and I moved into the first flat, we were the first renters, actually. So the builders weren't completely ready. The construction was still ongoing. And we got in, and after a day or two in the bathroom, the spring broke, the spring behind the fan, in front of this fan. So it didn't work anymore. So we called them in. They came in, replaced it. Over the weekend, it broke again. So we called them again because it didn't work. And they came in again. There has to be a different problem, right? Because we replaced it last day. Turns out the spring was broken again. And they didn't bring a new one. So the guy took his pen out, took this spring out of the pen, put it into the fan, and said, okay, this is only temporary. We didn't bring a new one. So you use this one, and we come in again this week and replace it with the correct one. Needless to say, I've never seen these guys again. When we moved out of that apartment, like two or three years later, the fan was still working. And the same happens in IT. Whenever you go for a temporary solution, you kind of get stuck, not with all of them, but with some. And eventually, it will come back to bite you because, well, you need to set up a new system that doesn't work the way it's planned because there is that temporary fix somewhere. Open source licensing. Yeah. Sometimes it feels like it's under growth. It's not that easy to get through, but it does make it interesting for lawyers, right? Anyone left here that's a lawyer? Okay. But in general, you have to audit your open source usage and you have to establish corporate policy. That could be in a small company. That could be something like, well, let's talk. It could be something where you need a full department doing it. It depends.  And you don't care about the licensing because you thought there's nothing in there. It's all your source code. It's not. So there are a lot of open source licenses and the basic incompatibilities are well known. Admittedly, a lot of developers don't care, which even creates problems for open source projects. Like the Postgres project I work on, it's BSD license. We cannot accept any GPL source code or else Postgres would be GPL. But still, people just send patches, use this library instead. No, we cannot. Stuff like that. A very important point, or actually two, if anyone starts doing open source software, please don't try to put it under public domain. Public domain is not a license but a status, meaning nobody owns that software anymore. And in most legal systems, I don't know how it works here, but in most legal systems, there is only one way to put anything under public domain, and that's by dying. And you don't want to do that to get the right license to your software, right? The only exception I know is that US federal government work by definition is public domain, but only inside the US, yeah, right, makes sense. And the most restrictive license you can use is no license at all. So no matter what you do, put something in there and explain to people how they can use it if you want them to use it, because if nothing's in there, they cannot use it at all. And before you think about that, no, the patent is not the solution for protecting your intellectual property right. It may not be a problem for you, but it definitely is a problem when it comes to collaborative workflows within your unit, with other units, with your contractors, with your customers, whatever. Because at the end of the day, open source is more than just code. It's also about work processes. A lot of companies use what they call inner open source or inner source nowadays. They just look what the communities do and figure out, well, that could help us and use it internally, which doesn't work with patents, even internally. Let me see. At one point, maybe early, maybe late, everyone figures out you run into a situation that you cannot handle yourself, so you need help. It could be a classical service because you don't have enough resources. It could be you don't want to dedicate resources deeply enough, whatever. So in the proprietary world, you would go to the vendor and get support, services, consulting, whatever. There is no vendor in open source. No company should own any project, which is not exactly true. For community-backed projects, it's correct, but there is a lot of, well, commercial open source where a company alone handled the software, like in the database space MySQL. I cannot send, well, I can send, but they will never accept a patch if I send one to MySQL. They cannot because of the dual licensing thing. So if you want to go for support, there are two options. You can have free support by communities. Keep in mind, they are not based on SLA. Community will help you when they see fit. And I've been, as a community member, I've been in a situation where somebody sent me an email saying, well, I got this buck here. You have to fix it because it's critical for me. Well, since when do you pay my salary? I make the decision if, what I do, when. And that's the way to not do it. Starting a demanding back report in the open source community won't get your help faster. It probably slows them down. And at the same time, the way you communicate with the community is different. So it's not like contractor or supplier and customer. And the way you have to communicate is different. You cannot say, well, I paid you all that money. You didn't pay for me. You just got it for free. And that's the one thing you have to look for when you are contracting an open source services company, that they have people who speak both languages, your corporate language and also the open source language. So they can kind of liaise between two. Speaking of experts, in most markets, I know there are not enough OSS experts available. So for everyone who's still looking into getting into it or into finding the field they want to get into, open source certainly has a great future. There are enough trainings and university classes available. But be careful with certifications. There are some available that really make sense. And there are some that are pretty crappy. And I got in my own business life, I got a history in ISO 9000 family certifications. This is the classical example you use there to show that this certification doesn't make any sense whatsoever. The left hand is a life vest, right? The right hand could also be a life vest. You can make life vest out of concrete. And it's actually cheaper and easier to do it. Because you don't have to worry about a return process. Once it's used, it's gone. But you get it ISO certified. If your processes are correct, no problem whatsoever. And like that, I think I hit the nail on the head. Any question? Command? Criticism? What about the neutral argument that defines a company and it's a very complex software that says some 3D modeling stuff. So now I have the option to use a commercial software or use Blender. So now if I switch you over to Blender, I have to do all this training and all these things which you mentioned. But now I've done all the trainings and now the Blender community just splits up. It splits up. It gets applied and they're all like throwing the towel and Blender is not existing anymore. What do I do now? So this is, I feel this is the reason why often businesses are not interested in these orders. I don't think the Blender example would work because the community is too big already. And the same problem holds for companies. By a software from a provider company and they could go bust. Yeah, but they sell me lessons. Yeah, but if they don't exist anymore, I've literally, I mean this sounds like a joke, but I've talked to a bank and they bought a system for risk management from a small software company that only had one developer really knew. And that guy wrote this bicycle onto a tree or into a tree. So not nice, but it happened. It took them three years to get an upgrade on the software. So it's not open source specific. And the worst case, you could take that software because it's yours anyway as open source and do the development work yourself. It will not go away, but assume you buy the software, the company, well ends the product and you need to upgrade your operating system, but it doesn't work on the new one. You cannot recompile it yourself. So in my book, the risk on the proprietary side is bigger than on the open source side. Any more questions? But it might not happen anymore. And this bank buys software. It's only written by one for a reason. Because of all the ISO stuff and now all their processes in place and they need to look into it and they might not even give the contract to them. True, but it doesn't change a thing in terms of going bust. It doesn't matter from which big company you buy, they still can go bankrupt. Or they just decide this product doesn't give us enough profit and we don't want to do it anymore. We're shifting the focus of the company. We're not a 3D modeling company anymore. We're now an audio processing company, whatever. And the product just, it doesn't exist anymore. Thanks for the analysis on migration where you showed the RY. So from your study, did you get any insights on which industry domains are in this migration easier, for example, Well actually, those examples are all over the place. So I don't think there's any industry for which it's easier. There are industries who are more willing to give it a try. And there are use cases where people are more willing to give it a try. Just as an example, when you think of a large machinery that has a database server, a lot of database servers, the price tag for that is big. If you have only one that gets connection to hundreds from the outside, the price difference is way smaller. So it's usually price driven. But from the technology, from the technology, there's a difference. So it's different from migrating informants, Postgres or Oracle to Postgres or Windows to Linux or Unix to Linux. Those are differences. But if that Unix server is a bank or an insurance company or an airline, it doesn't make a huge difference. Yeah, that is true. Interestingly enough, most of the time they talk about regulation and so on, it's not really a problem.  And yes, they're in the same situation that he just mentioned. They need to tick the box as in it's supported and company has a certain size, blah, blah, blah, all this stuff. So they cannot probably go for the open source and do it all themselves. So they need somebody to help them. True. But that's it. Yes. Right, right. Yeah, but it's mostly for certification and tick the box. It's one of the most critical arguments that I hear against using open source in the companies in enterprises is that we cannot use this because we don't know how to do it. We need someone who does it for us. And we don't even want to touch it because if we do it ourselves, then we also have the liability. Yeah, but that problem is essentially solved. That's what companies like we are for and others. It's not about saying that we are the only ones, but people just need to learn about it. I think I need to go.