Live from Vancouver, Canada. It's theCUBE at OpenStack Summit Vancouver 2015. Brought to you by headline sponsors EMC and jointly by Red Hat and Cisco with additional sponsorship by Brocade and HP. And now your hosts, John Furrier and Stu Miniman. Okay, welcome back everyone. We are live in Vancouver for OpenStack Summit. This is theCUBE, our flagship program. We go out to the events and we extract the sales from the noise. I'm John Furrier, my co-host. Stu Miniman, our next guest is Jonathan Brice, executive director of the OpenStack Foundation. Welcome back to theCUBE. Yes, thank you for having me again. Great day one kickoff. OpenStack flourishing. The market in cloud is booming, okay? You got the big guys rolling in, a lot of startup. Some consolidation we saw last summer. Some companies moving here and there. But still overall, robust growth. Give us a quick update. What's happening? What's going on? What's the state of the union and the foundation and in the ecosystem? Yeah, well I think the things that I'm really excited about are what we announced this morning. We have two big initiatives. The first one is around interoperability between OpenStack environments. The promise of OpenStack has always been this global footprint of clouds that give you compute, storage and networking in the same way. And that allow you to basically take advantage of this footprint wherever you need resources. That's something that the community has worked towards for years. And we now have tests and validation in place that really make it a reality and prove how it works, which products and services are validated and in that. So that's a big piece. And the other one extends that even farther into federation between these clouds. So our latest release had a big update around federated identity that lets you take one cloud and connect it out to other OpenStack clouds. And if I have a user account in this cloud and a trust relationship with other clouds, I can provision resources in any of them. So we're really seeing the vision. We're really seeing the dream of what OpenStack can enable. Come forward and be real for these people. Great, so Jonathan, if we've been talking the last couple of years, OpenStack isn't a singular thing. You've got all these projects. There's more projects coming in. As you said, interoperability has always been one of the big promises. So can you unpack for us a little bit? What is, I believe, Defcore is kind of the big initiative that you've got a number of companies working on. Who's doing it? How do they determine what goes in and how interoperability works and what makes that foundation? Yeah, so OpenStack has this massive community that just pumps out innovation constantly. And it can be confusing sometimes to figure out what do I need to deploy today? What should I be looking at for next week? What should I be planning for next year? And that was really the thing that we wanted to solve with interoperability requirements. You mentioned Defcore. So Defcore was a committee that was formed from the OpenStack Foundation Board as well as the larger community to answer those questions and to come up with what is the foundation for OpenStack? And they took a really interesting approach to it. I think it took about a year and a half to get through this process. And it was all along the way based off of feedback from users, based off of feedback from this big strong ecosystem that we have, and looking at what is deployed, what's reliable, what's scalable, and making that the foundation for kind of all of the rest of those services. Yeah, so many of us lived through some of the early Linux days and what is supportable and what can I do with my applications? So where are we with OpenStack? How do I know if I do a solution that is, does it get a powered by OpenStack sticker on it? Or how do I understand what I get and how are there solutions to it? That's a great question. And the program that we have that's actually administered by the foundation, which is the independent nonprofit, is called OpenStack Powered. And as you said, there's a logo, the OpenStack Powered logo, that these products and services get when they meet those requirements. The thing that we also do, because sometimes you want a storage solution, sometimes you want compute, sometimes you want both, we require them to provide which components they support, which tests they pass, and to publish all that information. So you can see exactly what you're getting, what capabilities are there, and as you said, you know, they want to know what app can I build on this and what app can I move between one OpenStack Cloud and another. All right. So can you maybe just step back for a second, talk about just kind of the state of contribution and the OpenStack in general. The board's gone through a lot of changes over the last year. I loved in your keynote, you really said how many people have contributed and a lot of people that are here at this show. What's your feel kind of like a stalt of the OpenStack community today? It is really unlike any community that I've ever been part of and I've done a lot of open source stuff and been involved in a lot of different projects, but you know, there's something that is a true community movement here that I just have never seen before. The last release was Arkelo release and we had over 1500 individuals that contributed code in six months for that release. 1500 individuals from I think 140 different companies. So very broad support and you know, a lot of people who are pushing in changes. And sometimes you know, one of the things that people will say, it was funny when we started OpenStack, it was, oh, it's just a rack spacing. And now people say, oh, there are too many companies involved. You know, one way or the other.  But if you look at the top contributors to OpenStack, there are always users in that top 20 bucket. You know, it's not just Red Hat and IBM and HP. They're great, they push fantastic changes up, but we have Yahoo, we have Comcast, we have companies like Cibera, which is a small Canadian organization who are contributing and driving it back to user needs. Always, you know, keeping us focused on that. And that has been such a huge piece of what's made OpenStack work. You know, what about a marquee customer like Walmart?  But you know, boy, they've got, you know, hundreds of thousands of people that could work on this. And the average enterprise, you know, wants to just be able to consume this. So, you know, how do you have that balance between a solution that works for a global audience versus, you know, kind of the typical enterprise? Yeah, the interesting thing about the Walmart, the Walmart deployment is he has a much smaller team than you might expect. You know, a team that you can count on two hands, we'll say.  But the software has come so far, and especially in the last couple of releases, that we see a number of deployments, like Walmart's and others, that number in the thousands of nodes with teams that are very reasonably sized, you know, five, 10, 15 people to run massive infrastructure that's critical to these businesses. What's the evolution of the consolidation? We saw, you know, Piston Cloud last year, we saw Josh McKenzie go to Pivotal, get Cloud Foundry out there. We had a lot of the changes going on, Miranda's stay in the course, in the distros. What is the, what's going on in the consolidation? And what's the business model? It's the free market in the distro. Welcome to capitalism. But there's some business model, things that are in flux, and as you said, it's a robust community, so you guys done an amazing job there. Code is, people are shipping code and speaking with their code, so to speak. But the business model, what's the deal with distributions? Is there a model there? I mean, Miranda's obviously banking on that. Yeah, well, I think that what we're seeing five years in is we are really starting to see the market give us information about what models they want to consume, what models they're not, you know, is ready to consume. And I think that the other thing that's happening is, early on when a technology is brand new, there's a lot of value in just getting it in place, getting it installed and running. As the technology matures, you know, a company is going to have to do more in their product portfolio in order to, to really carve out a, you know, a defensible position in the market. I think it's a combination of, you know, people adopting cloud, people deciding how they want to use that as well as the technology progressing. We're getting to a point where, yeah, they're starting to be some shake out in how all of this works. And I think it's good, honestly, for the community and for the ecosystem, because it has to happen. Yeah, fail fast is the model, but all the messaging's there. You got interoperability, you got multicloud, any app on any device kind of concept going on with VMware's got that same messaging. I know we got pressed on time, but I want to ask you one final question. For the folks watching, you know, we were teasing up the intro, like, hey, you know, every year it's like, where's the meat on the bone? And you guys are always constantly pushing out milestones and showing some great progress. Summarize for the folks out there, what is the meat on the bone this year? What is the big, is the ball moving down the field faster than you want, slower, faster?  They want it faster. Can you pedal any faster? What's the meat on the bone? I mean, the getting to interoperability and federation gives us an incredible footprint to build on. And tomorrow morning in the keynotes, we're going to get a sneak peek at some of those integrations. Companies want a platform that gives them stable, reliable compute storage networking so they can try out the next wave of technologies, pick the ones that work for them and build on that solid foundation. And that is where we are in OpenStack and that's what we're going to see this year. And it's really exciting how it's all coming together. So easy and efficient, fast and scalable, kind of is the mantra for the... Yes, those building blocks that every application need, you get them from OpenStack and you layer in the other technologies that can drive your business forward. And the monetization is at hand, waving at this point, like, look, there's just enough, there's so much business out there, it's not about can you monetize? The question is, how? Yeah, the thing that's interesting is, as you go, as the market around OpenStack continues to mature, if you go through our expo hall, we have 120 companies in there. And it moves to those other areas of value. It's not just about compute storage and networking, it's about big data, it's about platform as a service, it's about analytics, it's about mobile. And that's what we're now enabling is all of these other businesses besides just that core. The key point is enabling. Enabling platform creates a multitude of business models. It's actually on your view. I mean, if you're in the district business here or if you're in the app business, that's kind of the whole philosophy of the foundation. Right? Yeah, exactly. All right, Jonathan, thanks so much. I know we're tight on time. I know you're super busy. Thanks for coming off the keynote here. Join us on theCUBE. This is theCUBE. We are live in Vancouver for OpenStack Summit. I'm John Furrier with Stu Miniman. We'll be right back after this short break.


I'm about to show you how to make the best corn you've ever had in your life. Check it out. First, we're just going to throw our corn on, shucks and all, let it cook. So the corn cooked for about 30 minutes, we're going to take our butter inside, melt it. The corn is going to shuck right out of this burnt puss. All the little hairs come right off of it. Now we're going to take the corn, just like this, roll it in the butter. And now you need the cheesenean, that's the cream top. Parmesan cheese, danos, Italian herbs and spices, and we're going to heavily coat it. Now we've got them buttered and cheeseneaned up. Back on the grill we go, and we're going to char the cheesenean. Final product, let's get a bite. Oh, that's hot. Tastes good. That cheesenean crust on there, you've never had corn like this. I promise you, yum, yum, get you some. Leave a like, leave a comment, let me know what you think. We'll see you next time. Keep shriking. Mmm.


పిత్ంర౗ిలెక్నకిం ఆదించిట్స్డిక్నం. నిన్ధికోకోత్డిలె. 來, RPC is a remote procedure call model. ELIPE HOUSE,  HOUSE ennial Majesty of RPC ഏ൉ാ്ഒ്എ്ഁ ്ാല്ര്ന്വ്ക്ലുന്ക്ക്കെക്ക്ണ്ട്ക്ഉൃാ. It can be used as an IPC mechanism to communicate between processes on different machines as well as between different processes on the same machine. This is the figure of RPC model in which the left hand side shown is collar and right hand side shown is collie where collar call the procedure and wait for the reply. It will be sending the name of the method or function and the parameters of the method or function in the form of request message to the collie. So, request message can be sent from collar to collie. So, after receiving the request at the collie side, it starts the procedure execution. The collie will be execute the corresponding procedure and the result will be sending to the collar in the form of reply. So, at the collie side send the reply and wait for next request. So, reply message can be sent from collie to collar. After getting the result at the collar side, collar should resume its next execution. Implementation of RPC. To achieve semantic transparency, the concept of stub is used in implementation of RPC. Stub hide the interface of the underlying RPC system from both client and the server processes. To hide the details of underlying network and RPC communication package known as RPC runtime is used both on client and server side. Components of RPC. Implementation involves five elements, the client, the client stub, the RPC runtime, the server stub, the server. This is the figure of implementation of RPC mechanism. Here, the client will be calling the procedure along with its name and the parameters and it will be sending to client stub. Client stub will be keeping all these things name of the function or method or parameter in a particular format by using packing. And it will be sending to the RPC runtime client. So, client stub is sending the format to the RPC runtime of client. RPC runtime client will be sending this call packet to the RPC runtime server. After receiving this packet, it will be sending to the server stub. Server stub will be unpacking the parameters and name function and that gets executed. It will be sending to the server and that method will be executed at the server side. And the result will be sending from server to server stub and server stub will be packing that result in a particular format and it will be sending to RPC runtime of server. RPC runtime server is sending this result packet to the RPC runtime client. After receiving this result, the RPC runtime is sending it to client stub. Client stub will be unpacking this result and it will be sending to the client and after returning the result, the client will be getting the proper output. So, this is the implementation of an RPC. Now, we are going to see the role of client, client stub, RPC runtime of server, RPC runtime client, server stub and server in detail. Client, the client is a user process that initiates a remote procedure call. To make a remote procedure call, the client makes a perfectly normal call or local call that invokes a corresponding procedure in the client stub. Next component, client stub. The client stub is responsible for carrying out the following two tasks. The client stub is responsible for carrying out the following two tasks. First is, on the receipt of a call request from the client, it packs a specification of the target procedure and arguments into a message and then asks the local RPC runtime to send it to the server stub. Second one, on the receipt of the result of procedure execution, it unpacks the result and passes it to the client. RPC runtime client. The RPC runtime on the client's machine receives the call request message from the client stub and sends it to the server machine. It also receives the message containing the result of procedure execution from the server machine and passes it to the client stub. On the other hand, RPC runtime on the server machine receives the message containing the result of procedure execution from the server stub and sends it to the client's machine. On the other hand, it also receives the call request message from the client machine and passes it to the server stub. The job of server stub performs the following two tasks. On the receipt of the call request message from the local RPC runtime, the server stub unpacks it and makes a perfectly normal call to invoke the appropriate procedure in the server. On the other hand, on the receipt of the result of procedure execution from the server, the server stub packs the result into a message and then asks the local RPC runtime to send it to the client stub server. On the receiving the call request from the server stub, the server executes the appropriate procedure and runs the result of the procedure execution to the server stub. RPC messages. Client initiate RPC by using normal local call that invokes client stub. Client stub does the two things, one is marshalling, another one is unmarshalling. Marshalling means packs specification of target procedure and arguments into a message and sends to the RPC runtime. Unmarshalling means unpacks the result and passes it to the client. RPC messages. RPC runtime handles the transmission of messages across the network between client and server machines. It is responsible for retransmission, acknowledgments, packet routing and encryption. Server stub. Server on receiving a call request from the server stub, it executes the appropriate procedure and returns the result to the server stub. Think and answer. Pause the video and write the answer. In RPC mechanism, packing of message data is called as dash, marshalling, unmarshalling, no marshalling or none of these. You have to choose any one option among these four options. The answer is option A marshalling. In RPC mechanism, packing of message data is called as marshalling. RPC messages. There are two types of messages are enrolled in RPC, call messages and reply messages. Call messages used by client to request execution of remote procedure, reply messages used by the server to return the result. RPC is independent of transport protocols. It deals not only with the specification and interpretation of these two messages. RPC call message format. So, this is the figure of call message format in which it should be having a different field such like message ID, message type, client ID, remote procedure ID in which it will be a recursively three columns, program number, version number, procedure number and arguments. Two basic components, the idea of the remote procedure to be executed, arguments necessary. A message ID that consists of sequence number. From this we can find the lost and duplicate messages and for machine reply with the call. A message type field used to distinguish between call messages from reply messages. This field set to zero for call messages and set to one for reply messages. A client ID field for two purposes to identify client to whom result has to be returned to allow server to check the authentication of the client. Reply message. Reply message may be successful or unsuccessful. Both the messages have a different format. The figure reply message format for successful message, reply message format for unsuccessful message. These reply messages consisting of the columns, message ID, message type, reply status, result. So message ID will be same for the as that of call message. Message type field is set to indicate that it is reply message for successful reply. The reply status field is set to zero for unsuccessful reply. The reply status field is set to one or to a non-zero value to indicate failure. If non-zero value, then value indicates the type of error. When the server receives the call message from a client, it could be one of the following conditions. The server find that the call message is not intangible to it or it violates the RPC protocol or server rejects. Another reason client is not authorized to use the service, server return the unsuccessful reply. Remote procedure ID specified does not exist, server return unsuccessful reply. Server procedure not able to decode the specified arguments. Means incompatibility to RPC interface being used by the client and server. An exception condition occurs while executing the remote procedure, for example divide by zero. Executed successfully and result return, marshalling and results and arguments. So marshalling involves taking the arguments of a client process or the result of server process that form the message data. Incoding the message data on the sender's computer means conversion of program objects into a stream form suitable for transmission. Decoding of the message data on the receiver's computer means reconstruction of program objects from the stream form. For successful encoding and decoding of RPC message, the order of and representation method tagged or untagged must be known to both the client and server. This provides the type of safety between client and server. The marshalling process must reflect the structure of all types of program objects used in the concerned language. These are the references. Thank you.


Did you know that even this video about prequels itself has a prequel? Because this story actually all began when you pressed that fateful yet alluring subscribe button for the Grand Line Review, allowing you to receive regular One Piece content uploaded straight into your YouTube feed, which has led you here today. And if you have yet to subscribe, then please do, and let us begin your fated journey. Hello and welcome to the Grand Line Review, your source for everything One Piece, and today we're going to be getting into a slightly obscure topic compared to what we normally cover, but with One Piece approaching its quote end game, and pretty much guaranteed to end at some point I'd say this decade, I would like to take a moment to discuss the future. Well the future, primarily from the perspective of the past that is. Because once One Piece is over, it would be foolish to think that this would be the end of the highest selling manga of all time, and whether or not Oda himself is involved in future projects, I would wager that we are most certainly going to be getting more of it in some form, given that it is practically an excuse to print money. And one of the greatest money generating schemes that I could think of is to publish a series of One Piece prequels. And today I'm going to be discussing the prequel stories that I think we absolutely need. Now to be clear, these prequels don't have to be anywhere near as long as One Piece itself, in fact that's probably impossible. So I'm mostly talking about fairly short run stuff ranging from a handful of chapters, maybe even one chapter, to at most maybe a run of about a year depending on what we're talking about. But let's get straight into it with one of the prequels that I would most like to see, which ideally would be centered around the Roger Pirates. Now without going into manga spoilers, that journey, which you know is finally getting a bit of attention after decades of publication, but I don't think that we are ever going to have a solid chunk of story with the crew during the run of One Piece. And I believe that that's largely because we're not going to delve that far into the detail of any one character or group that is not the Straw Hats. The big thing about One Piece is that this is the story of the Straw Hat Pirates, so that's the group that we get to enjoy in all of their glorious detail and subtleties. Whereas other groups like the Roger Pirates, yeah we'll see a bit of them here and there, but their stories are mainly going to remain mysterious except for their major events. But that's less my interest, what I really want is to explore the Roger Pirates on a level that we get to see the Straw Hats. I want to see them on a mundane quest where they're just having fun and probably beating some sort of bad guy at the end maybe. It doesn't need to be Walt shaking oh my god pirate king ponderglyph history stuff, in fact it should be just the opposite. You know a short story about Roger's early days like whatever his equivalent of the East Blue Saga was. Like we know that Roger was born in East Blue so why not give us maybe 50 chapters of him starting his adventure in the old world. And you could have a bunch of cameo appearances like have him visit Kokuyashi Village or what not and then end the entire story with him setting sail into the grand line along with however many crew members that he had gathered by then sort of mirroring how the Straw Hats first began their journey into the grand line. That will just straight up give us more of the Roger Pirates in their prime and maybe focus on some of the more mysterious members of the crew like Seagull. Because I would pay any amount of money available to me to see a mini series with these guys they're all just so captivating but of course they're certainly not the only ones that could command their own prequel series. And next I'd like to present the idea of a series focusing on the exploits of one monkey digarp because the more I learn about the history of this man the more I think he really demands his own series as a protagonist. Putting Roger aside for now Garp is probably the most legendary figure in this world and it would be so cool to see his journey enlisting in the marines and following his career working his way up the ranks and developing close relationships with characters like Sengoku And I just know that any up-to-date manga readers will feel the exact same way after a certain chapter because after that I honestly feel like one of the most unfortunate aspects of one piece is that we will never get to truly see figures like Garp acting in their prime rather we'll just receive scattered panels here and there. Which is a very effective device and all the praise in the world to Oda for managing to hype up these characters but man do I crave more of them. Especially Garp because his strongest stuff all has to do with his time with the marines whereas most of what we know of Garp is how terrible a grandfather he is. So take all of that away in the prequel and you will have one incredibly phenomenal character to follow throughout the world. Alright next up I'm going throughout something maybe a bit left field and suggest a Gekko Moria prequel and this might have a lot of you sighing but really if something like this was ever announced then I would be beyond hyped. Moria is a tragic character to me both in terms of his actual story and in terms of his betrayal. He's one of my least favorite characters in the series because I don't particularly identify with his philosophy on becoming the Pirate King without doing anything whatsoever. However I am infinitely intrigued by what drove him to that state because Moria wasn't always a gigantic sack of crap with minimal ambition in fact he was once a fiercely driven pirate and at one time even considered a rival of Kaido. That is the Gekko Moria I want to see. The young full of dreams gogetter who along with many other world figures took this age by the balls following the death of Roger and even made it into the new world but of course this is a series that could only ever and tragically with Moria's inevitable defeat at the hands of Kaido as well as the death of his crew but I do think something like this would really help to put a new perspective on Moria in One Piece as well because even though yes we do know his past in theory I still can't really bring myself to care about Moria. I think that we are getting the worst possible incarnation of him in One Piece and there is just so much potential with this character that sadly may never be realized in the run of this main story. So prequel him up! Moving on let's briefly discuss what would be an obvious fan favorite with the ace prequel. Now the thing about this one is that we kind of already have an ace prequel with the novels that came out detailing his early adventures like meeting masked use, finding the Mara Mara no Mi and starting the spade pirates and it's a fun story one that I think would work really well if it were adapted into a couple of chapters of manga as well so that we could really take advantage of the One Piece aesthetic atmosphere. Other than that though I'm not actually sure how much you could do with ace. He's probably the one character in this video who we've explored fairly thoroughly in One Piece but at the same time if this whole prequel manga idea ever properly took off then he would be pretty much guaranteed to be at the top of that list. Maybe alongside Sabo as well. In fact it would be really hard to deny the possibility nay inevitability of a Sabo prequel as well. I guess it would detail his time with the revolutionary army prior to regaining his memories. You know stuff like training with dragon, hanging out with koala and bestest pal hack. Going on some initial missions and all that good stuff that we can't really know about at the moment because the organization is still deliberately unexplored for the sake of profound mystery. I will say it's definitely not the story I'd be most excited for because I feel quite neutrally about Sabo in general. However I would still be very interested to follow something like this because One Piece is my drug and I always need more so just hook it straight into my veins. As for something I would be much more keen for though can I interest anybody in the adventures of a young Sir Crocodile. Just like Ecomoria we'd be taking crocodile prior to him having his hopes and dreams crushed and you know come to think of it maybe this could just be an entire miniseries. The rise and fall of famous pirates chronicling each of their journeys to despair. But Crocodile would be a pretty great one because he's such a solid figure in the series that has connections all over the place. One of which is with Evenkov who allegedly knows a tantalizing secret regarding our Crocoboy but it also might be able to show how he got his scar during his fight with whitebeard. But keeping things in the role of the warlords, what say you all to a prequel featuring the world's greatest swordsman, Dracula Mihawk. Provided we don't see much more of his history in One Piece himself I think it would be incredible to watch his rise to becoming the world's greatest swordsman including some jewels with shanks and you know what this is actually probably one of the very few stories I've mentioned that could actually end on a happy note. Weird to think about but Mihawk is one of the very few characters in the series who seems to have set out to do something and actually achieved it. Good on him but getting back to failures let's talk about Joyboy and how great it would be to see a prequel set in the void century. Now Joyboy is one of the most endearing enigmas of the series and I'm sure that we will see him in some way shape or form before it's end but given that he lived 8 to 900 years ago I'm doubtful that we will get a solid piece of story which is a shame because the more I think about it the more I really want to explore a more ancient incarnation of the One Piece world. In fact I'd be much less excited about following Joyboy specifically as I would be just getting to see this realm in a completely different context because most of the islands would have existed back then like Fishman Island and even places like water seven were around during the void century so there's no shortage of nostalgia to be invoked while we make our way through a very very different One Piece world. Taking a step back from the more meta events of One Piece you can find a compelling prequel idea in just about every character and another example of which that I will put forward is one Bon Clay. I mean how many of you would just flat out deny a short Bon Clay prequel where we follow his childhood and early days training in Okama Kempo and detailing his journey into becoming a member of Baroque Works. Or along the same lines how about an entire Baroque Works prequel where we follow each of the primary members and how they came to be a part of the organization and instead of prequel you could even include the incident where they tried to recruit Zoro and he ended up killing that agent. And it could be very much chapter zero style where we basically had a montage of short scenes with their old figures which sounds kind of meh on paper but chapter zero was a pretty fantastic experience so it could certainly work. Now this next one might be a bit early to discuss but I would also love a prequel focusing on Marine Admiral Fujitora and quite specifically his decision to blind himself. I've always been incredibly curious about exactly what kind of evil drove him to do that out of sheer desperation simply not to see it and I know that it likely wouldn't be a singular evil either but this guy he's seen some stuff so I feel like it would be a great glimpse no pun intended or maybe pun intended I'm going to intend it a great glimpse into some of the darker aspects of One Piece. With that said I feel like there is every chance that Fujitora will have his own flashback in the actual series detailing these events even if it's only a short one but failing that you know a one-shot Fujitora origin story would have me pretty damn hype. And finally for this discussion may I present the possibilities of the tale of Woopslap. That's right in this long running prequel manga we would get to experience the day-to-day life of Woopslap which includes various mundane activities such as scolding young people, reading newspapers and asking if certain people know about certain things plus the most important aspect of this story would be finally getting to know the legend behind Woopslap's Rustafarian phase. I know this is quite possibly the most exciting prequel idea I've presented here but really there is so much potential for prequels in One Piece with its absolute wealth of characters to explore. Much more than I could ever even come close to covering in this singular video but all I can really conclude with is that I very much look forward to the hopeful expansion of this world the end of the series. But what do you guys think? Please do leave your thoughts in the comments below or even join my Discord server and if you'd like to see more videos like this then please do go and check out some of my other content or even subscribe to the channel for more glorious One Piece business uploaded straight into YouTube feed. But for now this has been the Groundline Review and I'll see you next time.


What's up everybody Jason here for JaspiesCaseBrace.com. We just sold out 2020 Top Triple Threads Baseball This is a three box break random teams number five and again four or five six are from the same intercase 30 spots all-card ship it every gets a random team in the MLB. So we sold These spots here from Barry down to Jonathan straight up and then from Eric down to Kevin We sold in a pack filler number 10 and 11 of mosaic and then of course here's the teams Let's roll it. We got ourselves a one and a two three times. Good luck one two and three three times Barry down to Jonathan three times one Two Three Kansas City Royals down to Miami Marlins three times three times So Barry you have the Kansas City Royals Kevin with these Cincinnati Rats Kevin Kevin and that was Kevin Benedict. You have the Astro Stephen Kendrick with you Orioles David Lee with the temporary Kevin Benedict with the Tigers Jonathan with the Mets and Barry with the Phillies Daniel With the Diamondbacks Mike Tower with the Twins Kevin with the Red Sox Joseph with the Angels Jack with the Dodgers Jonathan with the Yankees Ryan with the Iraqis Jack with the White Sox Daniel with the Indians Joseph with the Nationals Barry with Ace Kevin with the Blue Jays Kevin Benedict Tyler with the Braves Kevin with the Chicago Cubs Jonathan with the Pirates Barry with the Brewers Eric with the Giants John with the Mariners and Rangers as well as the Padres Danny with the Cardinals and Jonathan with the Miami Marlins. There's everybody there Now of course if anybody wants to make any trades Trade window will stay open for about a minute. All right. Does anybody gonna trade guys or no? if you are gonna trade just type in confirm trade so that way I can Do it if not Close in the window right now in 30 seconds. Hi, Kevin. You know how the Mets something with those Cubs Sweet sweet So like I said guys We're gonna do an F1 after this and Then one and one R&B's and the picker team. So we're leaving it open right at the end of the night after 1030 so we can squeeze in one more break before 11 o'clock and Like I said, I think I think if we can get that one spectra R&B spot sold at 233 a spot I think we can sell out the pack filler at 18 guys All right, so there you go. Joe mark these little access. Let you know for the same case Yeah, well, I should be done with this in 15 minutes. I think I have your break scheduled at 935 So I think we'll be perfectly back in time. Good luck everybody. We had one trade No, this is 2020. So Boba Shat your done You know Dodgers with Gavin Lux Let's do a dano. All right, we got Ted Williams for the Boston Red Sox going to Kevin M and Chris Brian bass for the Cubs Aquino and you're done ours future phenoms Austin Riley Tyler says pull me some braves And there you go 46 out of 75 Blakes now for the race David Lee Justin Verlander Versus sorry the Houston Astros going to Kevin Benedict and Ricky Henderson for the A's barrier Jose of Bray you for the Chicago White Sox to 36 Jack B Abraham Thoreau It's a 99 Houston Astros going to Kevin Benedict. All right. That was the first box guys next one You know, I I've seen a lot worse jack. He said it's normal now Jeets and ours is a kid. Oh yellow to 75 Dave Winfield Padres out of johnathan Trevor story Derek Lee two out of three Chicago Cubs two swings seven RBI's Three run homer in a grand slam trade mojo Josh Hader for the Brewers the walkie-brewers Barry Roberts We have a schwarber Ian have Nico Hornier autograph. Sorry Relic combos Another one there for the Cubs ad bird alzole Big trade mojo right now for the Cubs only All right last box guys.  I think that's a redemption Honus Wagner to 199 Francisco Lindor out of 275 Juan Soto Will we ever see Juan Soto? Anywhere else but Washington You think he ever leaves Washington Thurman Munson for the Yankees Yoshi Cambridge, Jr. And Jesus Lozardo Arce de Ziquino 10 out of 18 That's over the Reds Kevin Ronald Ocunia, Jr. One of one Born to hit patch autograph. What a hit for Tyler and the Braves Wow Congrats Tyler Jesus There we go All right for redemption at the bottom Match admin to 36 And yes, we have a redemption Good luck guys last hit rookie autograph card of Wow, what a box Not only do you get a 101 Ronald Ocunia, Jr. We had a Luis Robert redemption rookie autograph Going to the White Sox and Jack B And actually still valid up until 2022 What a what a great box to end it off with Man Little lubeb This would have been a great personal box.  Got a Matt Chapman relic quinoe some more base Edward Ozole got triple relic there josh hater Derek Lee out of three patch autograph We have Abraham toro autograph couple base Blake Snell Austin Riley couple base And of course the lubeb With the one of one Ronald Ocunia, Jr. Patch autograph Born to hit There you go, man. Congrats. That's awesome All right, so there you go guys. This was triple threat three box break random teams number five I'll post up the last three boxes. I mean who knows man. This could be a hot case Uh, so I'll post it back up guys. Jasper's case breaks.com. Thank you


Good morning and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2016 of the Health and Score Committee. I would ask everyone at this point to switch off mobile phones, because they can often interfere with the sound system. I will also note that many of us are using tablet devices instead of their hard copies of their papers. The first item on the agenda today is stage 2 consideration of the Health, Tobacco, Nicotine etc. and Care Scotland bill. I welcome the minister, Maureen Watt, Minister for Public Health. She is accompanied by Claire McDermott, bill team manager, Siobhan Mackay, tobacco control team, David Wilson, solicitors, office, food, children, education and social care team and Meryl Skeen, parliamentary council and all from the Scottish Government. Everyone should have a copy of the bill as introduced, the master list of amendments and the groupings of amendments. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. I will call a member who lodged the first amendment in that group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all other amendments in the group. Members who have not lodged amendments in the group or who wish to speak should indicate by catching my attention in the usual way. The debate on the group will be concluded by me, inviting the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up. Many committee members are allowed to vote. In any division, voting is by a show of hands. The committee is required to indicate formally that it is considered and agreed in each section of the schedule of Bill and Soul. I will put the question in each section at an appropriate point. We are all here now. Good. No, no, you are fine. I refer to the master list now. The first question that we have this morning is that sections 1 to 7 be agreed, are we all agreed? Yes. Thank you. I will call amendment 13 in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, group with amendments 14, 15 and 16. Malcolm Chisholm, to move amendment 13 and speak to all amendments in the group. It is interesting that, although there were different views about nicotine vapour products or e-cigarettes, as we commonly call them, there was not a lot of disagreement about what was in the legislation. However, one area where there were concerns expressed was in relation to the register. The fundamental concern of people who saw the positive side of e-cigarettes in terms of smoking cessation was that the single register would result in a conflation in the public mind of tobacco products and NBPs or e-cigarettes. There was quite a lot of discussion about this in the oral evidence and, indeed, the written evidence. It was picked up in our stage 1 report. Cancer Research UK, whom I am sure we all respect, highly went the furthest on this because they did not want to have a register at all. They were so concerned that it might send out negative messages about the potential of NBPs to allow people to stop smoking and, thereby, obviously improve their health. Others expressed that in the oral evidence. For example, Professor Lindum Bald, who has done a great deal of work in this area, said that, although I do not think that the same register should be used for sellers of NBPs and sellers of tobacco, it should certainly not be presented as the same register because they are not the same products. We need to do much more to get rid of tobacco from Scottish society. We should definitely not focus on trying to get rid of e-cigarettes because they might save some people's lives. Sheila Duffie of Ash, another organisation that I am sure we all respect, highly said that she agreed that the register should look different for retailers who register to sell NBPs because that might help to distinguish the product. We obviously heard and read quite a lot in this area and picked up on this in our committee report at section 59 of our own report. We said that a number of submissions highlighted concerns about NBP retailers being included in the tobacco register as it could send a confusing message that NBPs are as harmful as tobacco. Some called for NBP retailers to be listed in an entirely separate register or for a register to be created for retailers of age-restricted products. We then went on in the next paragraph to quote Community Pharmacy Scotland, who highlighted one of the practical problems that they saw from having the same register, quoting again, the stigma of having to be on the tobacco retailer's registers will likely mean that many community pharmacists will choose not to supply NBPs. That will reduce the likelihood of vapours coming into contact with trained healthcare staff who may be able to advise them on reducing their use of NBPs or encourage them to enter NHS smoking cessation services. The conclusion of the committee on this was a final quote. We have some sympathy with the view that NBPs should not be treated the same as tobacco by registering on the same register, given that the evidence indicates that NBPs are not as harmful as tobacco products and may help with smoking cessation. However, we also recognise the benefits of retaining the existing STRRR. I am not quite sure what that stands for. I am just reading from the committee report in terms of reducing bureaucracy and cost to retailers by building on existing practice. I am trying to, in a sense, reflect the committee's conclusions in my amendment, so I am certainly not going as far as cancer research UK. I am accepting the principle of registration mainly because they are indeed an age-restricted product, and we all want to prevent young people, children and other young people accessing NBPs. Given that there is going to be a register and that having two entirely separate ones might be problematic, as the committee suggested, I am trying to ensure two things in my amendments. First of all, I am trying to make it clear that there are very distinct parts to the register section 8 of the bill as drafted amends the provisions in the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services Act that set up the register so that it covers NBPs as well as tobacco. My amendments would formally require the register to have separate parts, and that would mean that someone would have to apply to be on a distinct part of the register. It is a modest proposal that does not go as far as many of the people giving evidence wanted, but that is the least that we could expect. I have gone a bit further in my amendments to section 15, but I am picking up a suggestion from the committee about creating a register of age-restricted products. Section 15 of the bill changes the number of sections, in part, titles, so that they refer to the register of tobacco and NBP retailers. The amendments change that to retailers of age-restricted products. The committee in suggesting that admittedly said that that should be something that should be created in the longer term, but on reflecting on the committee's recommendations, I did not really see any reason why we could not call the register that and effect start such a register at this particular point. Clearly, subsequent legislation could add to that. The register with that title that I am suggesting would have three parts to begin with, but it would be quite easy for subsequent legislation to add additional parts to that register. I think that it would deal with some of the problems that were described by those giving evidence if we called it from the start a register of age-restricted products. In that way, we very publicly avoid the conflation of NBPs and tobacco, which so many of people giving evidence wanted to avoid. In support of those amendments, there was concern that people using NBPs to quit smoking would get the right support, because it was seen as being much more successful if people went to a pharmacy, got an NBP and got the counselling and the support that went with it. I know that the pharmacists were particularly concerned about being registered as tobacco retailers, because they saw their role as being health retailers rather than retailers of something that was going to be harmful to health. There was real concern in that area, and it would be interesting to hear what the minister has to say on how we go forward with this. I will speak to amendment 13 and the other amendments in the group in Malcolm Chisholm's name. Amendment 13, which requires the register to comprise three parts, would have a practical impact on the structure of the register and on the database that holds the register. It would require the entries in the database for each type of business to be held together and separately from entries for other types of business. That may restrict flexibility in how the register is managed and presented to the public. I realise that Malcolm Chisholm has lodged the amendment in response to concerns raised at stage 1 by some in the NBP industry and some retailers that a single register may appear to conflate tobacco and NBPs. However, I do not believe that amendment 13 alleviates those concerns. Whether amendment 13 is accepted or not, the bill retains a single register, the benefits of which were recognised by the committee in the stage 1 report, the benefits being reduced bureaucracy and reduced cost to retailers by building on existing practice. However, I understand the concerns. As the committee knows, I have made a commitment to considering the outward facing aspect of the register. My officials will explore opportunities to provide a clear separation between the two products on the website where the register is held. With regard to amendments 14 to 16, again I can understand that Mr Chisholm may have lodged those amendments with good intentions to try to alleviate those same concerns. However, renaming the title of the register of tobacco and nicotine product retailers to the retailers of age-restricted products does not accurately reflect what the register is. It is reasonable to believe that those seeing that title may expect that it is a register for all age-restricted products, for example, including alcohol, fireworks, knives, glue and a wide range of products. That is likely to cause confusion. The title contained in the bill accurately describes the contents of the register. If we were to begin to include all those other products, there would have to be a very wide consultation, because it also includes justice interest in that. It may be an attempt to future-proof the legislation. However, should there be a proposal in future to amend the legislation to include other age-restricted products, the titles associated with the register should be changed at that time. As I have already said, I do understand the concerns raised by some in the NVP industry and retailers, and that is why I have made a commitment to considering that issue during implementations. For those reasons, I have asked the committee to reject amendments 13 to 16 in Malcolm Chisholm's name. I am pleased that the minister recognises that there is a problem, but I do not think that the solution that she suggested of having a clear separation between the two products on the website is a very substantive response to the problem. She said that, in relation to the First Amendment, it would restrict the flexibility in how the register is managed and presented to the public. We are trying to restrict the flexibility in how it is presented to the public. That is the point of the amendment, to make sure that it is presented in a certain way and not presented in another way. I would have to look further into the problem that she highlighted in relation to the flexibility of management. At the moment, I would have to say that I am a little sceptical about that. She also referred to concerns raised by some in the NVP industry, but I think that she will notice that all the people that I quoted had nothing to do with the NVP industry. We had cancer research UK with all their clinical expertise and scientific expertise. We had Professor Linda Balder, Professor of Public Health. We had Sheila Duffey, the director of ASH. That is not concerns from the industry but concerns from those who want to promote health and stop people smoking tobacco. In relation to the register of age-restricted products, I would like to reflect further on that. I am particularly looking to some of the issues that she raised around alcohol, fireworks, et cetera, because I think that there are different regimes for different products. I would still want at stage 3 to revisit this issue. I am quite happy to reflect on what the minister said. If I can come up with a better way of dealing with this problem, I shall certainly aim to do that at stage 3. Failing that, I may introduce one or other of those amendments at stage 3, but what I wanted to do today was to highlight the problem. I agree that it does not have an easy solution, but I think that the committee acknowledged that we would like to do something in response to the many concerns that were expressed about it. Given that I have committed to revisiting the subject at stage 3, I am happy to withdraw those amendments. The minister also indicated that she would wish to come back in at this point, so I do not know whether it is— I just wanted to say that the distinct parts, as I understand Malcolm Chisholm's amendments, would only affect the database, but it would not affect the presentation to the public. Between now and stage 3, I am quite happy to meet Malcolm Chisholm, if he would like, and to go over this together. I think that that is a very constructive approach, and hopefully the reflections of the committee report can make progress through those discussions. You are withdrawing at this stage, Malcolm Chisholm. I have not had an indication of any other member once they move it, no? The question is that section 8 be agreed to—are we all agreed? I now call amendment 2, in the name of the minister, in the group on its own. I will speak to amendment 2 in my name. Tackling counterfeit trade in tobacco products is recognised and forms part of the Scottish Government's wider tobacco control strategy, which seeks to reduce the availability of counterfeit tobacco in Scotland. The amendment will make a conviction that relates to the sale, possession and control of tobacco and NVP products, where there is unauthorised use of a trademark. Counter is a relevant enforcement action that could result in the local authority applying to the sheriff for a banning order. The aim of the offences under the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services Scotland Act 2010, as amended by the bill, is to reduce the accessibility and appeal of tobacco, smoking-related products and nicotine vapour products to children and non-smokers. Including those counterfeit offences will strengthen that aim and it will also contribute to strengthening our approach to counterfeit tobacco and further public health gains and other public interest objectives. The committee considered written evidence at stage 1, including evidence from the Society of Chief Officers of Trading Standards, Aberdeen City Council and the Fife, Health and Wellbeing Alliance, suggesting that those offences should count as relevant enforcement action. The amendment will support local authorities to strengthen enforcement action against irresponsible retailers who knowingly put the health of the public at risk and continually flout the law. Trade of counterfeit tobacco is a serious offence, although the Scottish Government is not aware of trade in counterfeit NVPs, there is potential for such a market to grow in the future. It therefore seems prudent to me to ensure that a conviction relating to the trade in counterfeit NVPs can also be caught as a relevant enforcement action. I move amendment 2. Thank you. The question is then that amendment 2 be agreed to, are we all agreed? Question is that section 10 be agreed to, are we all agreed? Question is that section 11 to 14 be agreed to, are we all agreed? Thank you. Amendment 14, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, is already debated with amendment 13. Malcolm Chisholm, to move or not move? Not moved. Members not moving? No other member wishes to put the amendment? No, thank you. We now call amendment 15, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, already debated with amendment 13. Malcolm Chisholm, to move or not move? Not moved. Members not moving? No other member wishing to move the amendment? No. We now call amendment 16, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, already debated with amendment 13. Malcolm Chisholm, to move or not move? Not moved. Thank you. Members not moving? No other member wishes to move the amendment? The question is then that section 15 be agreed to, are we all agreed? Yes. Thank you. The question is then that section 16 to 20 be agreed to, are we all agreed? Yes. Thank you. That ends our stage 2 consideration of the bill for today. I would remind members that amendments to the remainder of the bill should be lodged with the clerks in the legislation team by 12 noon this Thursday. Thank you minister and Andrew colligs for your attendance this morning. Thank you. We now suspend at this point, allow the panel to leave and then we are going into sub-legislation. We return to our agenda item number 2, which is subordinate legislation. We have two negative instruments before us. First instrument, public bodies, joint working integration, joint boards, integration, joint monitoring committee, Scotland amendment number 2, order 2015, SSI 2015, 432. There has been no motion to annull and the delegated powers and the law reform committee has not made any comments on the instrument. I invite any comments from the members. Rhoda? I suppose what was puzzling me slightly was that there was talk of a consultation but there was no information as to what the consultation responses were and I think that that would have been helpful. When we are considering it to know what people are saying, usually in other instruments when there has been a consultation you at least get a summary of what they are saying. I am not talking about a long summary but there were no concerns about this or whatever whereas it seemed to me that there was a fair amount of response to the consultation but no information as to what they said. I think that we can note that comment and even in retrospect I attempt to get some feedback but make the point for future that may be useful for us in the future that we did our understanding. On the other point— I suppose that it was a point of clarification whether people had a code of conduct that they would adhere to because they were self-reporting. It was up to them to decide whether or not they had a conflict of interest and if that is the case then there surely must be a code of conduct to go with it and that was not clear either. Apart from those comments, no others. Thanks for taking the comments into consideration but does the committee agree to make no recommendation? That is agreed then. Thank you. The second instrument is the Food Scotland Act 2015, consequential provisions number two, order 2015, SSI, 2015, 433. There has been no motion to anulwm the delegated powers and law reform committee. I have not made any comments on the instrument. Do members have any comments? No comment from members. The committee took it from that. The committee agreed to make no recommendations. That is agreed. Thank you. We now move to agenda item number three, transplant which we have previously agreed will be taken as normal in private session. We now move into private session.


The Mutual Broadcasting System presents The Mysterious Traveler, written, produced, and directed by Robert A. Arthur and David Cooke, and featuring tonight two of Radio's most distinguished personalities, Santos Ortega and Richard Cooke in No Grave Can Hold Me. This is The Mysterious Traveler, inviting you to join me on another journey around the strange and the terrifying. I hope you will enjoy the trip and it will thrill you a little as we travel tonight into the world of shadows, from which no man may return and we learn the story of one who does return. It's a story I call No Grave Can Hold Me. My story starts in a court of law where a man is on trial for his life. The courtroom is tense for the jury is out deciding a prisoner's fate, but the prisoner himself, a tall man with glossy black hair and piercing eyes, sits calmly with his lawyer, his daughter Nora, and his son-in-law Harry Wilson, waiting for the fateful verdict. Father, I think the jury is coming, you know. They say it's a bad sign the majority is out for such a short while. You needn't have to worry, either of you. I shall be free. I certainly hope so, Randolph, but all you know, you did admit you killed Clemens. Because he insulted me. He called me a mountain banker, a charlatan, a trickster. He called the great Randolph a faker, so he died. There they come. Oh, Father, I'm frightened. And they're taking you places in the jury box now. They look awfully grim. I repeat, have no fear for me. Foreman of the jury? Has the jury reached a verdict? It has, Your Honor. What is the verdict? We find the defendant guilty as charged, admitted in the first case. Oh, no, no. Father, who finds you guilty? The fools. They too think that I'm an imposter, a trickster. They shall learn different. If I die, so shall they. The prisoner will rise.  The prisoner will rise. Very well.  And know that death has come to claim them. Max, million Randolph, you have been found guilty of the crime of murder in the first degree. It is the sentence of this court that you shall suffer the punishment of death on the night of June 6th at midnight. And may God have mercy on your soul. Thank you, Guard Miller. You've been seen for only five minutes, Mr. Wilson. Yes, all right, Guard. Hello, Randolph. Good evening, Harry. I see that my Guard Miller managed to get you in to see me. Yes, he did. Time is so short that... I know. It's almost midnight. And at midnight, I die. But Guard Miller has become a good friend. I knew he'd arrange it. No, and I saw the governor this afternoon. He refused to do a thing. It does not matter. What is death but a new garment for the soul to wear? Nora's waiting outside. You said you didn't want to see her tonight. That is, as I wished. You were my assistant. We were very close, you and I. And now there is a last promise you must make to me. Anything, Randolph? When you receive my body, the empty husk of the great Randolph, bury it in a vault with a bronze door which faces east. A vault? Facing east. Yes, of course. The door must be locked with a padlock of bronze. But it must be possible to open it from the inside without using a key. Randolph, you... The coffin must be locked shut as well. But I must be able to open it from the inside. Randolph, show you not serious. I never joke. All this and one thing more. Promise. All right, I... I promise. When I am buried, meet my head, must rest a notebook bearing the names and addresses of the twelve jurymen who found me guilty of the prosecuting attorney and of the judge. But why, Randolph? So that I may know where to seek my vengeance upon them. The vengeance I have sworn which must be executed before my soul can sleep. Oh, Randolph, that's madness. You disbelieve. So do they. But in my studies I have learned many things. And one of them is how to reach back from behind the dark curtain of death. Time is up, sir. Thank you, Miller. Goodbye, Harry. Just tell me one more thing. Is the full moon shining tonight? Yes, it's a full moon tonight. Good. Each time hereafter that it shines, one of my enemies will join me in death. And so the great Randolph went to his execution and was buried according to his instructions. After a few days, his case was forgotten. Forgotten by all, but Harry wilson his southern law. Well, as the first month passed and the full moon again shone in the windows of his apartment, he changed restlessness possessed Harry. Harry, what's wrong with you? Oh, I'm sorry, Nora, but tonight, the night of the full moon, I'm nervous. I can't help it. Oh, darling, you're not worrying about father, are you? About his threat? Yes, I am. Oh, but that's absurd. Poor father. So at the end I'm afraid he was suffering from delusions when he was more than just an ordinary man. He wasn't entirely sane, Harry. No, maybe not, but he was so sure of himself, so certain. And he was so sure of his instructions for the way he was to be buried. Oh, of course, I am just being foolish.  It'll help calm you. All right, all right, I will. You want to come along tonight? No, I think I'll stay here and read. All right, I'll be back in an hour or so, dear. And if nothing happens tonight, I'll know that Randolph is just putting on an act. A little later, another man was also walking in the moonlight of a beautiful July evening. This one was short and stout. A young homework from a small poker party with his friends. When in the dark shadows cast by the trees along the edge of the park, a tall figure stepped directly into his path. Just a moment, Adam. Who are you? What do you want? Just to talk to you. I don't want to talk to you. Get out of my way. You're so fast, my friend. Look. For good. Say, what is this? A hold up? Adam, it is not the hold up. Then why are you threatening me with that gun? Why have you got that scarf coming in your face? Because my face has changed in the months since I was executed and buried. It's rather frightening now. What are you saying? Why are you anyway? You're beginning to recognize my voice, aren't you? You know who I am. You just don't want to admit it to yourself. Great Randolph. Whom you was forming of the jury caused to be executed. No, no, it's not possible. No one could come back from the dead. No ordinary man. But the great Randolph has found that. No, no, I don't believe it. This is a trick of some kind. And is this a trick, Adam? Is it? Is it? But Tommy killed you. Oh, he's out for a walk. Who is this? Don't you recognize my voice, Nora? Surely you heard it often enough. Father. Oh, no, it can't be. Strange how skeptical everyone is of me. Even my own daughter. Father, it is you. What do you want? I just want to tell Harry that I have claimed the first victim of my vengeance. Exactly on the stroke of midnight. The same minute when I died. Oh, no, no. And I wanted to warn him that he must do nothing to interfere with my plans. No, Nora, you... He telephoned here. You want to speak to me? Yes, Harry, just a little after 12. He said that he... Yes, I... No, I heard the news. I was in a restaurant having coffee and it came out of the radio. Adam's the foreman of the jury with found strangled in front of his home. Oh, but it's impossible. And yet it was his voice, Harry. Father's voice. Oh, we've got to do something. Nora, I've got to warn the others on that list. The other juror is bold when the district attorney in judge Dexter. Yes, but he said if you try to interfere... I know, but that doesn't matter. In the morning I'm going to district attorney Baldwin. He'll believe me. He'll have to. Father, Mr. Baldwin, you've got to listen to me. You've got to warn the others. You've got to give them protection. Or they'll die just as Adam's did. Winston, I'm a busy man. I have enough on my mind without having to listen to wild-eyed stories like the one you just told me. Oh, but it's true. Randall's instructions about the way he wanted to be buried, the notebook that I put in the coffin with him. Mere theatrical memory. Now, Adam's was the victim of an ordinary street mugging. That's all there is to it. I have to ask you to leave. I have more important things to tend to. Mr. Lord, you're a sensible man.  If you'll only print what I've told you, the authorities will have to take some action. Wilson, my job is to print news for our readers, not ghost stories. If I ran your story, I'd be fired tomorrow. Then you don't believe me. Tell you what I will do. I'll make a story for the Sunday Supplement. Oh, that won't do any good. If it's in the Sunday Supplement, people will just smile at it. When they see it, they'll know it's just a story. And I'm afraid there's no use in talking any further, Wilson. All right, I'll go to other papers. One of them will have to believe me. I don't advise it. You run a shop. Don't you're selling tricks and magic apparatus? Yes, yes, that's right. Why? Just this. Newspapers don't believe in giving free publicity, and that's obviously what you're after. Goodbye, Mr. Wilson. Sorry, Mr. Wilkin, but Judge Dexter is unable to see you. Oh, but, Miss, did you explain to him what it's about? How important it is? The judge said if you can't write him a letter, he'd give the matter his consideration. Oh, that's no good. I got to talk to him. I'm sorry. He's leaving today for his vacation, and he won't be back for a month. Perhaps he'll be able to see you then, but he simply can't see you now. None of them would listen to me, Nora. They either thought I was crazy or... but I wanted publicity. They all told me to forget it. They're right, Harry. That's the only thing to do to forget it. But, Nora... Maybe we're wrong.  I'm sure Father had nothing to do with it. Oh, no, no, no. He telephoned you. You heard his voice? I'm not sure now that I did. Maybe it was a dream, Harry. Maybe I just imagined it. So forget the whole thing. Please, Harry, for my sake, forget it. It's no good just pacing up and down. Please sit down and try to relax. I can't, Nora. I can't. Tonight's the second full moon since Randolph was executed.  But, Harry... There ought to be a guard over the wolf. He's buried in it. Oh, no, that wouldn't do him good. If he came back to him that day, he wouldn't be bothered by a guard. Please, Harry, you've done the best you can. And if it is true, when you go on like this, will you be in danger, too? I don't care. That's less, Nora. The names on it were alphabetical. And Adam's the foreman with the first to die. What are you driving, Nora? The second name on the list is Baldwin, the district attorney, Baldwin. Wouldn't listen to me last time with this knight he's got to. I'm going to his home now while there's still time. Mr. Baldwin, you are in danger tonight. I'm sure of it. Deadly danger. No, you mean it. I'm sure, Will. Yes. I thought it was some kind of a gag before. Now I can see you fully believe everything you've said. Then you will take precaution, at least for tonight. I've been an officer of the law for 30 years. I've been threatened by a lot of convicted murderers, but not one of them has come back to get me yet. But you don't understand. The great Randolph is different. He had powers that we know nothing about. Yeah, perhaps, perhaps, but I doubt it. Now, Wilson, I appreciate your warning, but I can't take it seriously. Then you won't guard yourself? No more than usual. I'll lock the door presently. I'm sure that'll keep out any ghosts who may come this way. Mr. Baldwin, please, it's almost midnight. At least let me stay with you for another hour. I'm sorry, but I'm about ready to turn in. I expect to sleep well, too. Now you go on home, do the same, because nobody's going to be harmed tonight by the great Randolph's spook. I guarantee it. Oh, no, please, I wish you'd let me stay. I couldn't think of it. Now you can find your way out yourself, can't you? I'm sure. Yes, of course. All right, Mr. Baldwin, I won't bother you any longer. Good night. Good night, Wilson. Now, he's gone. I'm afraid the poor fellow needs to see a psychiatrist. Randolph's ghost. I only hope I never have anything worse to be afraid of than what... Who's there? Who came in just now? Wilson, is that you again? Oh, my friend, it is not Wilson. Who are you? What the devil's the meaning of this? You don't recognize me, then? How can I? That cloak with the collar pulled up over your face. That is to spare the world a sight that should remain forever hidden within the darkness of a carpet. But, my boys, surely you recognize that? What are you talking about? Get out at once or I'll call for the police. It would tax their powers to arrest me. They have no authority in the world to which I belong. No. No, it can't be. I see you have recognized me. You should have taken Wilson's warning, Baldwin, because I'm here. The great Randolph at your service. Oh, this is impossible. That's been said of so many things, but I think I can convince you. No, stay away. Help! Help! That won't do you any good by the time anyone comes who will have joined me in the world of death. No, don't wave, you bin. I just went out to get the morning papers, why? Why? It's happened again. Just like attorney Baldwin has been killed. But how? Exactly the same way Mr. Adams was killed, strangled. Just at midnight. Oh, no. And Nora, I think I know the truth now. What do you mean? I don't believe it was your father at all. I think it was I that killed them. I killed them both. Oh, no, you've got to do it. There's a full moon tonight. You've got to lock me in this apartment. Oh, but, Harry, you couldn't possibly have killed those two men. I could. I was near the scene at both times, but it wasn't clear. I don't remember doing it, but don't you see, if I'd been hypnotized, I wouldn't remember. But, darling, father couldn't have hypnotized you into committing murder. It's a law of hypnosis. The subject won't do anything he knows is wrong. No, I know that, but I can't be sure. I believe that in those few minutes I was with him, somehow Randolph impressed on my mind, orders to carry out his vengeance for him. Oh, darling, I'm sure he didn't. But if you insist, I'll lock you in. All right. Well, I want you to go now. I cannot be safe for you to say with me. All right, Harry. I'll go to a movie. You've got to stay locked in until after midnight. Then even if I am hypnotized, I won't be able to do any harm. You do understand, Nora, don't you? Oh, of course, darling. I'm sure you're wrong, but I'll do anything you say. All right, now. Lock me in. And don't you come back until after midnight. Then I'll know. Well, maybe I'll try to get out, and I won't remember it. Yes. I'm glad at least you don't say, no, it's impossible. No, where are you, Randolph? I just wanted to warn you, and don't try to interfere with my plans. But, Randolph, I thought, hello, hello. Who is that? I'm not the one. Then in that case, yes, that's the only possible answer. I know now what the truth is. I've got to get out of here. The door. I'm so sorry. I couldn't break it down with an axe. There's no fire escape, and it's eight floors down to the street. I have at the superintendent, I can telephone the superintendent, tell him I locked in, and then you'll come and let me out. Judge Dexter, first, Adams died. Then Baldwin. Their names were the first two on the Great Adam Randolph's list. Your name is third. And so you think that tonight I'm scheduled to die, huh? Yes, yes, I'm sure of it. And you say you warned Baldwin last month just before he was murdered? I did. And he laughed at me. But he died just the same. And you're seriously asking me to believe that a dead man legally executed by the state is walking the streets tonight seeking my life?  I recognized his voice.  I know it. That's why I've kept quiet this last month. I did try to convince the police, the district attorney, and all I got was laughed at. And then... Yes. And yet, obviously, you're in earnest. I don't think you're crazy. I'm not. For a little while, I thought that I was the killer. You? How? I thought that I was under post-hypnotic control. Randolph had planted in my mind the impulse to kill his enemies. But that phone call proved that I was wrong. And what do you propose that we do? If we went to his tomb, perhaps then we'd learn the truth. Well, Wilson, what do you want to open Randolph's tomb for? If we go there and we find Randolph is still in his coffin, then I'll know that the real murderer is my wife, Nora. I have the key right here. I'll have the padlock. I'll have a minute. Well, then hurry. The moon is bright. I'd hate to have anyone see us. Yes, sir.  A man in my position prowling around the cemetery at midnight. Oh, but we had to come. Judge, we had to make sure. Well... Yeah. But like that, we can open the door. I'm rather sorry I paid any attention to you, Wilson. But we're here now, so let's get this thing over with. Now, I'm going in first. But don't forget, I'm armed. Oh, don't worry about me.  Be safe to turn on the flashlight now. There. See? There's the coffin. That's odd. Huh? What is it, Judge? Well, the air in here is fresh. This vault has been opened and very recently. Then it must have been opened by Randolph. Oh, nonsense. Open this coffin and I'll prove it here. How does it work? This catch on the side can be operated either from the inside or out. There we go. It's unlocked. Well, then lift the lid, man. Lift it. What? All right. I'll do it. There. There you are. Now, see? There's your precious Randolph, safe and sound, just as I expected. Quite dead, as he's supposed to be. He's still in this coffin. Yes, and that proves that it... Wilson, shine your flashlight down on the floor. I just touched a body lying here near the wall. Body? It's newer. She's dead. I don't think so. Here, give me that flashlight. What happened? Why did you turn out the flashlight? Something melted out of my hands. I can't find it. Of course I have it, Harry. That's why you can't find it. I am not. Wilson, what are you saying? It's Randolph. He's not dead. Oh, but I am, Harry. But don't let that disturb you. I want to thank you for bringing the judge here to me. Wilson, what are you? You're trying to play a trick on me? No, no, I swear. He's quite the innocent judge, Dexter. And as for Nora, she merely came to make sure I was that I'm supposed to be. Just as you get. When I spoke to her, she painted. Wilson, get the door open. We've got to have some light in here. Let's know you, Dexter. I can see in the dark like a cat and you can't talk. I have you now. No, judge. Where are you? You're going to die, Dexter. That cuter. As you ordered me. Executed. Randolph, let me go. I warn you, Randolph. I've got a gun. I'm going to shoot. You're too late. You all right? Yes. Yes, I am. Now see if you can find the flashlight. I think I've taken care of Mr. Randolph if it was Randolph. I think I have it. Yes, here it is. Judge. Randolph's burning. It's still in the coffin. I'd rather thought it would be. Harry. Oh, no. You're not hurt? No, just my head. I came here to see a father. Oh, you understand, Mrs. Wilson. And then someone hit you. Yes, but behind. There was someone here in the vault. I just got a glimpse of him and then and then he hit me. But who was it? That's what we're just about to find out now. Let me have the flashlight, Wilson. Yes, of course. I think he fell over here now. Yes, here he is. But who is he? He was impersonating father, but who is he? I hear he's lying on his face. It's better to turn him over carefully now. He's still breathing. And that's it. Oh, hey. It's Miller, the guard from the penitentiary. The one Randolph said he made a friend of. Yes, the one who was guarding him just before he was executed. So that's it. It was Miller. Miller, can you hear me? I'm afraid he's dying. Before father was executed, he must have hypnotized this man and ordered him to carry out his fantastic scheme of vengeance. That was a trick, but it was a very cunning trick. By means of hypnosis, Randolph used this man as a tool. Even though Randolph himself was dead. He must have recognized that Miller was unusually susceptible. I think we'll find that Miller was a psychotic to begin with. Otherwise, Randolph's hypnosis would never have worked. For no normal person can be influenced the way Miller was under any circumstances. Isn't there anything we can do for him? No. No, he's gone. And with him the great Randolph has died too. For good. The mysterious Traver again. So the great Randolph is dead for good, is he? I wonder. After all, Miller wasn't the only guard Randolph had a chance to talk to. Oh, but he couldn't have hypnotized any of the others. I wouldn't give it another thought if I were you. Unless, of course, you were on the jury that convicted Randolph. In that case? Yeah, you'll have to get off here. I'm sorry. I'm sure we'll meet again. I take this same train every week at the same time. You have just heard the Mysterious Traveller. A series of dramas of the strange and terrifying. The role of the Mysterious Traveller is played by Maurice Chocolate. In tonight's cast were Satis Ortega, Richard Cougan, Shirley Blank and Bill Smith. Original music composed and played by Al Finnelli. All characters in this story were fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons was purely coincidental. This is Bob Emmerich speaking. This program came from New York. This is the Mutual Broadcasting System.


In her organizational leadership classes, Mary was often required to use research articles. The first time she was asked to find a research article, she was a little confused. Was a research article the same as a scholarly article? If she found an article in a database, did that mean it was a research article? Mary's professors explained that scholarly journals publish many different types of articles, and not all of them are research articles. When she searches in a database, not all of the articles she finds will be research articles. In fact, not all of them will be scholarly articles, since many databases also have news or magazine articles as well. Research articles are those that report the findings of an original research study or experiment. Some research articles describe quantitative research, some describe qualitative research, and some describe mixed methods research. Another type of article often found in the scholarly journal is known as a literature review. In a literature review, the author does not conduct their own research experiment. Instead, the author reviews articles written by others and summarizes their findings. While literature reviews are published in scholarly journals, they are not usually considered research articles. Along with research articles and literature reviews, Mary learned that scholarly journals publish other types of articles, such as news articles, book reviews, and commentaries or letters to the editor. Although published in scholarly journals, book reviews, editorials, commentaries, reflections, or other similar articles are not considered to be scholarly articles. These articles do not describe the results of her original research study, and they have not been through the peer review process. At first, Mary had difficulty determining the type of article she had found. However, she learned to carefully read the abstract for the article, as this often described the type of article she had discovered. She also realized that research articles often have specific formats, with clearly labeled sections such as methods, results, and discussion. Mary also realized she could enter search terms that would describe the type of article she wanted. For example, in addition to her specific search term, she would type in quantitative or qualitative to limit her results to certain types of articles. Learning about the different kinds of articles in scholarly journals made it easier for Mary to always find a specific kind of article she needed.


Hello, and welcome to this presentation of the STM32 Infrared interface called IR-TIM. It covers the main features of this peripheral, which is used to generate an infrared remote control signal. This slide highlights the differences between the STM32F0 and STM32G0 IR-TIM modules. An infrared interface for remote control is available on the device. It can be used with an infrared LED to perform remote control functions. TIM-17 is used to generate the high-frequency carrier signal, while TIM-16, or alternatively USART-1 or USART-4, generates the modulation envelope. The IR output signal can be driven on GPIOs PA-13 or PB-9. To generate infrared signals, the following software configuration is required. IR-MOD field in the CIS-CFG-CFGR1 register controls the multiplexer in charge of selecting the source of the modulation envelope signal. IR-POL field in the CIS-CFG-CFGR1 register selects the polarity of the IR output signal. GPIO-PB9 can be configured to support high-driving capability in order to accommodate the high sync capability of the IR-LED. GPIO-PA-13 does not support this option.


Hello and welcome back here to the channel. I'm EvilRabbit. We are staring at my drift division S15 That we are going to be taking on the track here in a very tight toge section So make sure you guys follow me on all social media, I'll just find the description box below. Let's get to it We do have the S15. We're gonna get our fans and everything turned on Little tight toge section, which I've never driven this road before so this could be a full-on toge run This looks very narrow V8 In this S15 just power on command thousand some horsepower Can't see That big pillar in my way It just lights them up and forth. A little left foot breaks Well, this is Super tight. Oh, we kind of hit the wall. If we change the views up to go with third person as well But do it all the views Sometimes driving these new toge roads is definitely a challenge When you don't know where you're going Or how tight this turn is gonna be Luckily the V8 can get me through it usually in fourth gear They're just assaulting this toge in the third almost died the fact this car can just Throw itself out in fourth gear from a clutch kick is definitely insane You guys are part of my patreon. You guys got a chance to drive this car It is up on the paint job for you guys to try We may have to take a look at this beginning section and replay camera because We are just Ripping through here, and I don't know where I'm going both blown on first oh first looks oh Kind of wall hit there So we're gonna try and that runs a little bit third might actually be harder with all these trees. Oh, we're dead Apparently I drive better in first person on unknown roads Yep We drive better in first because I'm probably more focused on what's in front of me that was around me Oh, yep.  We'll take a look at that first section in the replay camera because I feel like that was actually really crazy. This is getting really tight now Oh, this is probably one of the tightest tokens I've ever driven Probably not the best idea to bring a thousand horsepower. Oh car out for this little uh little tap there, but Those cones are really nice for me to know that there's a really sharp turn It powers through the woods Oh, this is a very challenging track As I look away for a second if we uh kind of go off in the woods. I was trying to look It's up on my other monitor.    Oh, that's a turn around huh So we're supposed to flip it around Go back the other way But I think not much tires left. I think you can see not much tires left at all Fifth gear It's just smoking them in fifth probably smoke them in sixth too As you can see we have tires at all left on the back of this S15 We can just clutch kick fifth gear and just roast it. Oh, we should probably slow down So let's go take a look at that replay Camera and see if we got a good replay camera. Take a look at that beginning section of this track But looks like we do have a decent replay camera That S15 definitely very aggressive. I'm gonna take a watch of this replay angle Because I could not really see where I was obviously in first person I love this car one of my favorite cars bringing these cars out and all these drift division cars and everything that I'm Working on this being one of my test cars Like I said, you guys can drive this car.  It's for download all of which found in script box below if you want just Basically died a treason. I don't we can't we couldn't see what was going on So I do enjoy watching replays of runs where I was just basically thrashing it and uh Not really making too many mistakes. We made more mistakes in third person than we did first So I'm gonna let you guys enjoy this replay and enjoy the sounds of this s15 v8 Who messed up hardcore? So I'd like for you guys to let me know down in the comment section down below if you guys like this style video Or we drive first person and then watch the replay and digress the replay angles of the car Afterwards now for tandem and stuff like that when we're just having thrash a lot of ways We probably still run some third person But running in first person on these mountain roads and stuff like that are definitely insane to see So you guys can get a chance to see it from all different angles So let me know down in the comments what you guys think if you guys are not subscribed to the channel Do appreciate support if you tap the subscribe button So as always I thank you guys for coming back and watching army for habit. I see you guys on the track