Coming up on DTNS, why Sony is ditching E3 again, a machine to keep livers safe for transplant up to a week. And Patrick tries to convince us, and maybe himself, the Quibi can succeed. This is the Daily Tech News for Tuesday, January 14th, 2020, in Los Angeles, I'm Tom Merritt. And from Studio Redwood, I'm Sarah Lane. And from the cold, cold forests of Finland, I'm Patrick Beja. And I'm the show's producer, Roger Chang. Patrick, we realized during Good Day Internet, it's been more than a month since we talked to you. We missed you. OK, I don't even know what tech is anymore. It's been so long. What do we do on this show again? Don't try to convince me of that. LaWanda Vutek has been going strong. It's been getting like accolades on Twitter, I saw. So, folks, if you want to hear us talking about that and Japan, we talked about Patrick's upcoming trip to Japan and some of the tech there. Good Day Internet, got to get it. Patreon.com slash DTNS. Let's start with a few tech things you should know. A small percentage of Instagram's global users will now be able to access their direct messages, or DMs, from Instagram's website. The company calls this a test and says that more details on a potential wide-scale rollout will come in the future. Why don't they like the web? Epic's Game Store reports it now has 108 million users putting it on-bar with Valve's Steam Store, which had 90 million users as of January of last year. Epic says that beyond Fortnite, $251 million represents sales of third-party games, excluding coupons and excluding promotional funding Epic has given to developers. At a press conference Monday, US Attorney General William Barr repeated a request that we mentioned during our CES coverage last week for Apple to help the FBI unlock two iPhones belonging to a man who killed three people at Naval Air Station, Pensacola. Barr said, quote, Apple has not given us any substantive assistance. Apple rejected that characterization and said the Attorney General's saying they have responded to all FBI requests promptly with all the information it had, which it said is many gigabytes of information. So whether it stays a war of words or not, we'll have to keep an eye on it. After years of quarterly declines, the PC market grew between 2.3% and 4.8% in Q4 2019. According to research firms, Gartner and IDC, a boost between 0.6% and 2.7% over 2018. IDC also says 2019 was the first full year of PC growth since the market grew 1.7% in 2011. Verizon Media launched a privacy focused search engine called OneSearch that promises no cookie tracking, no ad personalization, no profiling, no data storing and no data sharing with advertisers. Verizon says as part of its search optimization process, it will store a user's IP address, search query and user agent on different servers so that it can't draw correlations between a user's specific location and their search. All right, let's talk a little more about Sony and its relationship to E3, Patrick. Indeed, complicated relationship. A representative from Sony Interactive Entertainment told GamesIndustry.biz that it will not participate in E3 this year, adding, quote, we do not feel the vision of E3 2020 is the right venue for what we are focused on, end quote. Sony says instead it plans to participate in hundreds of consumer events worldwide. And Gadget notes that E3 attendance declined from 69,000 in 2018 to 66,000 in 2019. By comparison, Gamescom has drawn approximately 370,000 people for the past two years. The ESA, which puts on E3, opened the conference to the public in 2017 and appears to be moving the conference to appeal more to fans and influencers. Yeah, I think what confuses me a little about Sony is on the one hand they seem to be wanting to say we wanna go directly to the fans and the ESA is like, well, we're trying to bring the fans into E3. And Sony is like, well, that's not really in line with what we want. I mean, so first of all, Gamescom indeed attracts a lot of people, but E3 has been opening up to the fans a little bit. It's never been a fan event per se. Also Gamescom is ginormous. It's impossible to compare the two, but E3 has been losing relevance for a good while now and PlayStation Sony was not there last year either. What's surprising here is that we all expect, well, they will announce the PlayStation 5 this year. All the details, they've already talked about it a little bit. And some people, me, expected them to do it at E3 because for all its woes and issues, E3 is still a place where you can reach the maximum number of press, not just specialized press, but the general public press. And it seems Sony is thinking, you know what? We really don't need any of that. Now they might announce stuff around E3. A lot of companies do that without actually being on the grounds at E3, which I'm sure is very annoying to the ESA which gets revenue from E3, but they might also just continue doing what they've been doing, which is do their state of play direct to consumer videos and announce everything there. I think E3's relevance was in question anyway and this year might have been the last big year for E3 if Sony went in order to reach the consumer media. Now that they're not going this year even, the questions about E3 are even more pressing. And Microsoft will be at E3 and Phil Spencer tweeted today that they're excited to present at E3. So we will get Xbox Series X details at E3 from Microsoft. But this reminds me, Sony pulling out reminds me of when Microsoft pulled its booth from CES. It was earth-shattering to think of that LVCC without Microsoft right there next to Intel in that corner. Well, in these days, Intel isn't even in there. It was Huawei and Samsung's Neon and Hisense. And CES is doing just fine. So I think what Sony is playing with is what a lot of other companies have been playing with which is our consumer focused announcements do better when we just make them directly to consumers. And the internet allows that. So we get more bang for a buck out of that than paying for a booth. Whereas Nintendo says both. Yes, we wanna make our announcements direct to consumers over the internet, but we also will have a booth at E3 where people can play our games. So different combinations work for different companies, I suppose. Patrick, what do you think the reason that Gamescom is drawing so many attendees and E3 is on the decline? Because Germans are crazy. Oh. It's, I mean, Gamescom has a tradition of being a wide reaching consumer show. And it's been that for years. It's worked up to that. And it is, honestly, people who go to E3, it's like a couple of holes. Gamescom is eight holes. Everyone in there is there, and everyone wants people to try their games which E3 traditionally has not really been a place for people to try the games. If you're not pressed, now things have been changing. But it was more of a media event. Gamescom has been a consumer event from the beginning. Also the time of the year, Gamescom is towards the end of summer and companies don't have as much to announce. They've already announced stuff at E3. So people go there to actually play the games. And Europe, Cologne is more probably at the center of more easier access for people in Europe, stuff like that. But yeah, the bottom line is Germans are insane. Thank you for everything. Living on to Google, Google announced Chrome Test Tuesday to start implementing its Privacy Sandbox proposals from last year. Among the proposals are a privacy budget that places an upper limit on the data a website can collect and a trust token. So sites can tell you, you're not an untrustworthy actor like a bot or a spammer without needing to track you. Bigger than these, Google plans to phase out support for third party cookies within two years and Chrome will stop updating the user agent string that gives data on things like browser version, non-OS and OSs. The string is used as a part of fingerprinting which can track a browser without using cookies. An alternative called client hints is in development as well to let you know what developers can run which features. Yeah, so client hints is supposed to help developers who really use the user agent string to tell if their feature's gonna work and then serve it or not. And we'll see how well that works. But Chrome freezing the user agent string is a big deal, especially if they're gonna get rid of it. That's gonna help with fingerprinting. Google planning to phase out support for third party cookies, that's huge. And that hits Google's own bottom line as an advertising supported company. I can only imagine Google has a way they think they can convince advertisers it's worth spending their money still, even if third party cookies still are not served for tracking across multiple sites. It seems like an earthquake for the ad business. Third party cookies, if you don't have those, then the entire ad business changes significantly. So I wonder, yeah, the really interesting thing is gonna be what alternatives do they think they can make work? Maybe they will be more privacy protecting alternatives. It seems difficult to believe when you're talking about ads and targeting, but yeah, those are, I mean, this might turn out to be one of the biggest changes in that business this year, for sure. Yeah, I mean, they're gonna phase it out over the next two years and we'll be looking for what they do as an alternative. That'll be very telling. Microsoft issued patches for Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 and 2019, fixing an exploit ranked by Microsoft as one. That's the second most severe ranking in the Microsoft ranking system. The flaw was discovered by the US NSA. Now, the NSA flagged the bug, it did not say when it discovered it, it would also not give details in advance of the patch, but security researcher, Brian Krebs, wrote that his sources were telling him the bug was encrypt32.dll, which controls certificate and cryptographic messaging functions in Microsoft's crypto API. That flaw could be used to spoof the digital signature of a piece of software, therefore making malware look legitimate. So that's a huge security risk. And it could also compromise Windows authentication and the way it handles sensitive browser data from Edge and IE. So this is something you'll want to put on your Windows machine as soon as it's launched and be as careful as you always are about what software you put on in the meantime. But this is a big deal. How long has the NSA had it? That's the question. Were they making use of this for a while and then decided to responsibly disclose later? We don't know. It is unusual for the NSA to hand over a bug like this. And it doesn't seem like it's an ancient bug. It is in Windows 10 and in Windows Server 2019. But one can imagine the NSA might have figured out the best use of this bug before they disclosed it. Who knows? They may have thought the risk to themselves was bigger than the exploit. Who knows? For sure. And it might have also been that they used it for a little bit then realized others had found it and decided now's the time to disclose it. Let's talk about the human body. Who's ready? Okay. Okay. Livers for transplant can only be stored on ice for 24 hours before transplant. Okay. A team from the University of Zurich has developed a machine that can keep human livers alive for seven days outside of the body. The machine recreates the pressure found inside the body, pumps oxygen, blood and nutrients, removes waste products, algorithms adjust the mix of nutrients as well. And the machine was tested on 10 human livers deemed to damage for transplant. Six survived and even seemed healthier after with lower levels of compounds linked to injury. The researchers now need to show the machine works on transplantable livers and that livers stored within the machine are safe when transplanted into patients. Yeah. So the four of the livers that were tested on the machine that didn't survive might have been just too damaged. That that's what they need to figure out next. And then they need to figure out if they keep a liver going for seven days, are there any unexpected consequences of transplanting that preserved liver into a human body? But if everything goes well, overcoming those two questions, suddenly a lot more people are gonna be alive because a liver was able to be kept for them for seven days and certainly for 24 hours. Absolutely. Yeah.  Liver transplants historically very difficult. Time is of the essence. Seven days versus 24 hours, that's a big deal. Also not to diminish anything about that if there's one that was in better shape afterwards, could I put mine into the machine and then get it back? I mean, I don't drink that much, but maybe for some people it would be useful. There's, I mean, that is an intriguing part of this study is there a secondary usage of this besides just preservation for transplant? Could you rehabilitate a liver somehow by using whatever effect is causing the liver to get cleaned up? Could you clean up people's livers? You're right, Patrick, that's fascinating. Yeah, yeah. I went to the liver cleaning company this weekend. I mean, I suspect that it's still a long ways off until the procedure to get your liver out, cleaned up and back in is something that people can consider. I mean, I'm just saying, if your liver is in bad shape, maybe. Patrick, you mentioned drinking. I mean, are there other reasons that livers would go afoul? Oh, sure. Yeah, there's all kinds of diseases that can attack a liver. Surosis doesn't happen just because of drinking. That's just one of the most common. Yeah, it's not just, I mean, not a doctor, but the liver is essentially the cleaning facility for the body and the blood, right? So anything that gets too toxic gets cleaned by the liver and I don't know what I'm talking about. Let's move on down to the liver. Science, clean my liver. Also, your kidneys do that too. Google's AI department posted to its blog that it has used machine learning to make fast, accurate weather forecasts. Now, the paper has yet to be peer reviewed, but the researchers believe that their system can generate accurate rainfall predictions up to six hours in advance at one kilometer resolution with just minutes of calculation. And that's the big advance. There's a little bit of a limited situation here, but the minutes of calculation is what's important. Existing calculations can take hours to generate forecasts, though they can do so more than six hours in advance and with more complex data. So this isn't gonna be a replacement for everything, but as an example, U.S. federal agencies process up to 100 terabytes and take around six hours to complete the process before they can come up with a forecast. That means you can only do three to four runs per day and every forecast you end up with is six hours old. So conditions may have changed by the time you get the forecast data. The Google algorithm, however, taking minutes can keep you up to date, even though it's only six hours in advance. So it's an important milestone. The Google algorithm was trained on the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration radar data from 2017 to 2019. And instead of trying to model the weather, which is what usually we do, it just makes predictions about radar data based on the machine learning that it's done. The Google algorithm was only outperformed by existing methods when attempting to make forecasts more than six hours ahead of time, hence the six-hour limit there. Google's not alone in researching this sort of stuff. IBM, Monsanto, they're all researching the use of AI in weather forecasts. But it's a good thing to know about where we are because everyone expects machine learning to really help with weather forecasts. And this tells you how much it's helping at the current moment. This is where we are with that technology. Well, and when it comes to things like smartwatches, the thing I hear most from people who have fitness trackers or smartwatches is, yeah, I have the weather on my watch. Well, having the weather that's a little bit more up-to-date and is actually more accurate is only more helpful. Yeah, six hours isn't a lot of time, but certainly in fast-moving events, extreme weather events, things like severe thunderstorms, that can be helpful. Tornadoes, so we used to get tornado warnings within like an hour of them happening. That sort of thing could be useful. So this will find a place, but again, it needs to be peer-reviewed and actually published. But it's looking positive. It looks like it's a positive development. And like I said, it's a milestone so that you know, like, okay, this is the limit right now of what machine learning can do. It won't always be the limit, but right now machine learning is better than existing conditions at radar, rainfall forecast within six hours. So we got a ways to go. To get all the tech headlines each day in about five minutes, be sure to subscribe to dailytechheadlines.com. Last week during our CES coverage, you'll be forgiven if you missed it. We talked about Quibi's announcement of more details regarding its upcoming mobile short video service. And we talked a little bit about the turn-style feature. That's the one that lets you watch content in portrait or landscape mode with no black bars. So they shoot it so that it's safe in either orientation. In fact, sometimes they shoot special content so that you get different content depending on the orientation of your phone. It's easy to criticize Quibi. I hear you doing it right now, listener. It's easy to pull the concept apart and talk about why it won't work. I hear myself having done that in previous episodes. But Patrick, you were starting to think that maybe Quibi makes sense. Maybe is a key part of my argument. Humor us and play the part of someone who's gonna help us understand why Quibi will work. Listen, Tom, you don't understand anything. TV is dead. The new screen is the phone. No, okay. I do think that there is a tendency of thinking of Quibi as another streaming service and a competitor for Netflix and Disney Plus and Hulu and all the others. That was my reaction at first as well. But I think all of the arguments that Katzenberg and Meg Whitman, thank you, are putting forward do make sense. It is not the same thing. And everything that has been tried to capture that idle time that people spend on their phone with TV-like services has been either made for TV, which is an incredibly different setup, or as many people have pointed out when they say, oh, short form mobile focused content doesn't work, made by companies whose job wasn't to make content for video content. It was companies that were social networks and that kind of thing. And it wasn't what they were focused on. It was the video content was a way to increase time spent on the app and use a job of the app. So kind of blind leading the blind, right? Facebook, which doesn't know anything about video production, asking video producers to make video for mobile when those video producers only made television. Exactly. And I mean, I think the focus of those, they weren't all in, I don't think. I think there were a few tries, and even when you're on Facebook, you're not gonna go and look at the video like it's one of the things you see in your feed and it's probably interrupting your watching your feed as if it's more than a minute, you're not gonna watch it necessarily or rarely. So it's kind of a situation where, for many, a different number of reasons, the situation wasn't ideal. And what Quibi is doing makes a lot of sense. I think it's easy as you mentioned to make fun of the turnstile feature, which honestly, I think is a gadget, but the features that change things when you rotate the phone is a gadget. The fact that you can watch your content, regular content without special features, you seeing something different or just you decide you wanna watch it in either orientation, that's very useful. The fact that they are focusing on different kinds of content, scripted, news, how do they call them? The little bits, the tidbits, the small bits. Quick bites, there you go. Hence the name Quibi. Exactly. That's what I was trying to get you to say by being sneaky. And so all of those things, I think there is space on mobile for video and no one has cracked it yet. And the fact that no one has cracked it doesn't mean it's not crackable. No one's cracked it yet. No one's cracked it until someone has. And it's been the same for all of services innovations and hardware innovations. It seems on the cusp of being something until it finally is. And then everyone realizes that it could be something. And in this case, I think they have a lot going for them. I agree with you on the turnstile thing. Not having to think about what position my phone is in is a positive. What I hope they realize soon is giving me two different views, depending on my orientation, is disruptive to my viewing. I don't want to have to think about what orientation I'm in. I don't want to have to move my phone to see different parts. But that's a detail. I mean, they're talking about views. And hopefully they'll realize that and just lean into like, hey, just shoot it safe for portrait or landscape. And then it might become a positive. What I will argue with you with that. What I will argue with you on is that no one's cracked video on mobile, YouTube and Instagram have absolutely cracked video on mobile. I disagree. I think- Cracked video, but it's still the Wild West. You know, the idea that Quibi is like, okay, we're not competing with Netflix.  That's what Quibi's doing and Snapchat as well. Yeah. But that's what Quibi says they're doing is we want to be while you're waiting in line, the high quality content you use to kill time. High quality. High quality, yeah, exactly. High quality. It's not memes. It's not something you put in the background as you're doing something else as YouTube is. Right. It's, it could be something that you- It's programming. That's, the company wants to be like actual hybro programming. Is there crying need out there for people like, man, I really want to kill some time, but this quality of video is so low. No, it's the opposite.  Yes, no, absolutely there is. Absolutely there is. There is, no one- I think you'd like that to be true. I don't know if it's true. Well, I mean, the need doesn't, you know, it's the forward quote of show me what you want. And so if, if I did what people wanted, they would ask for faster horses, that kind of thing. It doesn't really exist yet. No one has put real money, real creative power into making video content designed- Not at level. You're right about that. At this level. This is the whole other level, yeah. Yeah, I think there's really something there. And again, the fact that no one's managed yet doesn't necessarily mean it can't be done. I mean, a lot of people spend a lot of time playing idle games that never played before those people on their phones. I think they could be convinced to watch a fun five minutes of comedy or a summary of news on the topic they're interested in. They could be convinced to pay for it though. Well, I guess that's another question. Yeah, that is a whole other question. Yes. I'm not arguing about the business model. I'm arguing about the core concept. And to be honest, I'm not certain it will succeed. I just think it might. This has been a great conversation about this. If you want a longer breakdown of just what Quibi is doing, why they're doing it, what parts make sense, what parts will be more difficult for them. I did that as an editor's desk. It's a 17 minute long look just at Quibi. You can get that at patreon.com slash dtns. QuibiTalk and others always, always, always appreciated on our subreddit. You can submit stories and vote on others at dailytechnewshow.reddit.com. Let us know what makes sense to you. Also join in the conversation in our Discord, which you can join by linking to a Patreon account at patreon.com slash dtns. We have got such good stuff in the mail bag these days. We got an example of that, don't we, Sarah? In fact, we do. Professor Metcalf, Prof Metcalf in our chat wanted to chime in on our conversation yesterday about Twitter troll scores or the possibility that we would have them. Professor says, there was a question about whether the ramifications would be of a high troll score. In my mind, I see a slider in the user's Twitter settings that allows a user to decide just how much trolling they are OK with. If a troll has a higher score than you're willing to accept, you wouldn't see their content. Rather, you might see a three-dot type thing, indicating something is below your acceptable score. This should make it easy enough to provide the functionality that we want, meaning the users are in control of what they want to see. You could even let somebody quickly access their preferences by clicking the ellipses. Certainly no suggestion is going to be a silver bullet, but I really like this one because it puts me in control. And it says, the troll score isn't a deciding factor of whether you're viewed or not. The troll score is evaluated by you as a user to be like, OK, I've said it at seven and I seem to like what I see. I think that's good. That's an interesting way of looking at it. Thank you, Prof Metcalf. Also shout out to patrons at our master and grand master levels, including Mark Gibson, Dr. Carmine M. Bailey and Mike McLaughlin. And thanks to Patrick Beja. Patrick, we missed you. Happy 2020. Where can people keep up with the rest of your work? I guess I'll talk about the Laurent Des Voutek today. It's my French tech news show. It's weekly. And if you speak French or if you want to learn French, what better way than to listen to a topic you're already familiar with? We had a great episode about CES and talked about a few things that maybe you haven't heard as much about from CES. We recorded it today.  La plus intelligence, right? Something like that. Yeah, yeah. Close, getting closer every day. Listen a bit more maybe. All right, I'll keep working on it. Hey, we have new Patreon reward merchandise to celebrate six years of DTNS. Len Peralta created a six-year anniversary DTNS logo. If you back certain levels at patreon.com slash DTNS for three months, you can get either a sticker, a poster, a mug, or a t-shirt. Get the details at patreon.com slash DTNS slash merch. We're loving your feedback. Our email address is feedback at dailytechnewshow.com. We are also live Monday through Friday for 30 PM Eastern 2130 UTC. Join us if you can and find out more at dailytechnewshow.com slash live. Back tomorrow with Scott Johnson. You won't want to miss good day internet. Tomorrow with Scott Johnson. Talk to you then. This show is part of the Frog Pants Network. Get more at frogpants.com. Club hopes you have enjoyed this program.


Hi, my name is Richard Roberts. I was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1993. I will be giving the keynote address at Inago's forthcoming conference entitled See the Future. I plan to share some of my experiences and thoughts on how I see the future shaping up for career scientists. I hope to see some of you at the conference next month and I look forward to any questions you may have. Thank you.


is when finance met improv, with the subtitle of how finance executives are like these. What we're going to be talking about is what's going on with finance executives and in particular charity finance executives in terms of the environment and why improvisation skills are absolutely brilliant to help them with what they need now. Because we do things for love and not for money. Absolutely. So we're calling on a program that we co-created with Paul Z. Jackson called Prepare for Change. So a little bit about me, my name is Belina Rafi and I have an MBA and I used to work for a big bank and now I have the pleasure of teaching improvisation skills to business people to help them be more adaptive, more joyful and more thrive-able. And I love this quote. I got this quote from Bernie de Koveyne's site actually and it's the opposite of play isn't work, it's depression by Dr. Brian Sutton-Smith. Now my name is Karen Bradshaw and I'm the CEO of a charity called Charity Finance Group and I've had the pleasure and I do mean pleasure of working nearly 20 years with accountants who as you know are well known for their depression. So I have a business accountant and his name is David and every time he sees me calling on caller ID he picks up the phone and he says no. And he does this for two reasons. The first one is it makes me laugh every single time. And the second reason is he's kind of stealing himself because he knows I'm going to ask him something for which he's never been trained or asked before. Now David's not alone for most of the accountants that I've come across in my working career they're all trained down this side of the screen, down the left. They plan, they are used to working with figures and data and then they consider the things on this side of the screen as the things they do when the plan doesn't work. They don't see adaption and collaborative and spontaneity as being things that they are rewarded and recognised for. So when I started trying to articulate what the challenge is to Belina naturally I'm being a lady who thinks in pictures started talking about bees. There is a reason for bees. So when she said you know finance executives are like bees. Okay, so I can see that bees go out into the environment and they gather pollen and financial executives go out and they gather information. And they use that pollen, that information as good stuff, as nutrients for the organisation and they're both really cute. I don't know. And having had a conversation with Belina already I said yes and what I was really guessing at was the structure that bees operate in. My brother keeps bees and what he was telling me is that keeping them in the boxes is all very good for us and it helps us, it's scalable, it's a nice rigid predictable structure. It enables us to extract honey but it has a lot of other negative sides to it. It's short term, it's not resilient, it's very prone to disease and to parasites whereas in natural state there's a lot less, there's much more resilience and a lot less problems arising from particularly parasites. So we wanted to look at these sides of things and how these could interact for accountants and in very many ways you put accountants in boxes, you stereotype them and so do the people that they work with. So what we wanted to do was get to the position where this plan B isn't about improvising but that is a natural state that helps accountants to be collaborative because the environment's changing and they're being asked to collaborate, to dazzle, to be innovative yet their natural state is to plan, to analyse, to have structure. So there's great scope for what we do, the improvisation as being freedom within structure to help financial executives to loosen a bit of some of the too much structure of the one year budgeting plans and actually say if we build both sets of skills we have choice which is really important. What we don't want to do particularly in charities is be so efficient that we're not effective, that we lose our soul, our values, our purposes. So what we've been doing is a one day program that we co-collaborated with Paul Ze Jackson on and we focus on the following three skills. We focus on being resourceful and collaborating and leading. And obviously the feedback you've been talking about results is the most important thing and from our initial courses we've had the most important lesson from the day is the notion that you can set direction but you cannot plan for each step of the journey and you have to be prepared to improvise as you go. I'd call that a result for an accountant. Thank you. If you want to find out more come to our session tomorrow. Thank you guys very much.


Hi everyone Sean with jaspys case breaks calm here doing a 2018-19 upper deck spx hockey five box break Three random teams each spot number two So we've got a list of customers here So the coyotes in the wild are comboed so there's going to be 30 spots Obviously 10 spots sold three random teams each list of customers from Frank down to Matt buckler the list of teams From the anhyme ducks you can see the coyotes in the wild spot there comboed down to the Winnipeg Jets Since we only got 10 here. We're going to copy this and we're going to triple it up Well, so now you should see Matt buckler there last spot mojo twice Scroll up a little bit another time with the two spots and another third time with the two spots So dice roll here to see how many times we're gonna remind each list five to four nine times One try this again one two three four five six seven eight and Ninth and final time From Matt buckler down to Matt buckler add that to the spreadsheet now nine times on the teams one two three four five six seven eight and ninth and final time From the Calgary Flames down to the anhyme ducks Let's make this a little bit larger easier to read trade window open right now We'll read the list as is Matt buckler with the flames Frank know with the panthers Matt buckler with the sharks Wesley Thomas with the islanders William La Mica with the Bruins Frank know with the coyotes and wild combo Wesley Thomas with the Canadians and the red wings Frank know with the avalanche Matt buckler with the fliers and lightening William La Mica with the Canucks and the sabers Wesley Thomas with the kings Matt buckler with the blackhawks and the jets Frank know with the hurricanes Matt buckler with the devils Wesley Thomas with the blues Frank know with penguins Matt buckler with the leaves Wesley Thomas with the stars Frank know with the oilers and the senators Matt buckler with the predators knights Golden Knights and the Capitals Frank know with the blue jackets and the Rangers and Matt Buckler with the ducks Let's go ahead and sort this by team name No talks of trades. So we'll go ahead and print and rip if nobody has anything to say So five boxes. This is a second half of a full case So Joe earlier today did the first half Don't exactly know what was in there But here you can see put the X marks on there to designate that this is going to be for break number two, which we're doing right now Here is the final break list Good luck, everyone There was none in the first half Nick. Okay, so apparently Elias Pedersen was not in the first half He's obviously one of the big chases in this one Nick saying that in a non positive way Who'd you get in the first one Nick? Last time I pulled a Kale McCart draft a letter signature, so numbered out of 35 see if we can make it two days in a row with the big rookie autos Jake for Taunton first up Nikita Kutcher off to 299 for the Tampa Bay Lightning Matt Buckler One of his last spot mojo spots Clear Hard much better Just buried cook Konami To 299 for the Montreal Canadians Wesley Thomas More team Broder Relic No numbering on that looks like New Jersey Devils Matt Buckler and Daniel Brickley for the LA Kings So it is the cards Silver ink auto LA Kings Wesley Thomas It's like white residue on some of the cards looks like it comes off very easily, so There you go, Nick Not fit for a LA Kings auto There we go much better still the HL for Brickley So he's seasoning that's what we're saying so they pull the trigger a little bit too early on his rookie cards Did he come up at all this year? Any ice time for the main team? Patrick Kane to 299 for the Chicago Blackhawks Matt Buckler Evan Bouchard The stuff comes off guys, but you can see all the white on here For the Oilers Shadow Box rookies Frank no Miro Heiskanen black illustrious rookies relic for the Dallas Stars Wesley Thomas Oh, he played in the 18. Okay Travis Dermott for the Toronto Maple Leafs Matt Buckler Rookie auto to 2 49 Nick, who's your team? I'm obviously you were chasing Pedersen in In the break, but the oats I can respect that Were you a fan before they were the oath or before when they came down to Phoenix? Michael Russ Musin black illustrious rookies You see all that white See the part that I clean compared to that part. I don't want to do any damage on there So we're gonna leave him as is but just so you know For the Detroit Red Wings, that's Wesley Thomas and Jake Bean SPX rookies to 2 99 for the Hurricanes and Frank no Okay, what's the status you think they'll stay or Henry Joka Harju rookie relic for the Blackhawks Matt Buckler and Eli Tolvannon nice patch there one two three four colors Number eight out of 40 Rookie trademarks patch and auto Nashville Predators Matt Buckler really nice looking card, huh? Who's a Who's the new owner? wasn't there a Prospecting team looking at possibly Going back up to Hartford or anything Alex Marelia Robert Thomas rookie relic for the St. Louis Blues Wesley Thomas and Taylor Hall To 2 99 for the New Jersey Devils Matt Buckler Braden Shen trademarks relics 1 41 to 199 St. Louis Blues Leslie Thomas Who knows Nick? Who knows and Brett Howden Shadowbox rookies That's a shadowbox rookies audit Was the other shadowbox rookie auto was that an auto too, I just realized that that does come out Interesting for the New York Rangers Frank no, I know right. It's really hard to see was it other shadowbox It was not see No auto on that one Auto on this one Very hard to see almost passed it up the glass does come out on that too flexi a little shadowbox cover Another shadowbox rookie auto Robert Thomas for the St. Louis Blues Leslie Thomas Nathan McKinnon relic Colorado Avalanche Frank no you so volumaki to 349 for the Calgary Flames and Matt Buckler And last card Henrik Vorkstrom black illustrious rookies material for the Florida Panthers and Frank no Didn't it was crazy Both both ends of the court That pass for the dunk Intense Okay guys that was 2018-19 upper deck SPX hockey five-box break three random teams each Number two. I'm Sean Jaspies case breaks calm Check the site if we have more we'll definitely load it up there. We'll see you next time


Hey man, so Instagram model Asian, I just post I lost 100 pounds. Yeah, thanks man, that's Peter. Hey y'all, new to the channel, you haven't already, be sure to subscribe on my second channel since everybody keeps asking. I just dropped a video explaining how I lost the weight. Let's say it is though, bro. I don't recommend what I did to anybody else. I'm enjoying the fruits of my laboring. That you know what I'm saying? I'm more athletic now. I do have a ways to go and I'ma get there fellas. You know, look it, I got the clees, you know what I'm saying? Oh that's... Oh, Peter. It's because I had this in my pocket, it's really what it was, I'm gonna put this down. Oh yeah. Oh, you have gloves. Huh, y'all didn't come with gloves? I did. Are you kidding? What?  I knew, I was just joking, I knew he had gloves. Bro, how do you fit your fucking... Oh, I did it the wrong way. Oh my goodness. Hey, hey, hey, so check it out. Back before I gained all the weight, I still was, I wouldn't say I was athletic because I was never truly explosive. I was still slow man. People would still beat me off the dribble. So it's not enough for me to lose weight and believe that I'm just gonna be incredibly athletic. It's not me, feel me? I know what my body's like. So I just been lifting weight and I'm trying to do it explosively.  But I'm just trying to go up and weight. As I've been losing weight, I've just been enjoying playing basketball a lot so I haven't been doing a lot of this. I need to get back to this right here. I'm trying to get to 225 at least.  I just do right off the bat.  Hey, I am dropping a video on my second channel where I was a virtual fan at two Raptors games, the most recent Nets playoff game and the last season game. I don't want it, but don't even say that. What, look, look. I don't know what that footage is like so I can't confirm it's good or not. Oh, it's gonna be a banger. Oh no, bro. It's gonna be a banger. It's actually way more stable.   And about a year from now we're gonna use you again so don't get fat. You right. Okay. Yeah, don't get fat, bro. But if you do need to get fat, I can tell you how. That was definitely way closer than I expected.  I got a bad start. It's really what the problem was. Oh, that's what it was? Yeah. So how well do you think you did? I don't know, because nobody timed it. I mean, it's time for the camera. I just, I just feel like, you know what I'm saying? I just do another one. Good point, good point. This time, don't do a full start though. You ready?  Oh, nice. He almost deads Brian right there. Did he almost catch that? I did. God damn. You know, it's times like this where I really do think to myself while having people subscribe to my second channel.  I was just a fan at an NBA game, virtual fan in the bubble. Dropping that video soon, come subscribe to that. Could've got that if I wanted to. I just want everyone to know that. You know what I'm saying? Down 100 pounds. I really just want to get like, really want to get like Glenn baby Davis. You feel me? Just athletic, just real athletic. I do want to get explosive though. That's gonna be my next thing as I lose weight because I don't want to lose weight and be skinny. It's not a good look for me. Definitely why I'd be fat than skinny, but I'd rather be fit than fat. Hey, I had a lot of people in the comments ask me, Asian, did you lose weight?  Yeah. Yeah, yeah. I just want to, I had to go outside.  Did she eat a fuck? Did she eat a fuck? Why did it go in my mouth? Did she eat a fuck? How did it go in? That happens with the Airbnb. Oh my God. What's that? What's it like a non copyright beat? I can't play. The only mute this part, mute this part. All right?  Lead, lead, lead. Are you editing bro? Mute this part? Cause I need to play something that like bangs. I need to be able to know if I could do this. Here we have agent, agent getting ready, laying down on the bench. Stop speaking to third person.  Stop interrupting. Don't be third person though. There he goes. He picks up the weight. Stop saying he. Boom, one rep. Oh, you could see the struggling. I'm saying, okay. It's been a month. It's been a month. You could tell it's been a month for him. What's up? Wow, look at him go. No, it's not. He keeps being third person. It's weird. I really do want to start lifting more. Do you know any like built, swole Ethiopian people? Onward. One. I don't know any others, bro. Hey, but yeah, I do four exercises.  I'll do that later for when I'm trying to look good. But right now I just want to develop strength. You feel me? So that when I'm destroying, we'll lead in this wrestling match. I'm whipping him like this right there. That I had the strength to do that. You feel me? Keep adding clips to the video work when we do, I could definitely wrestle you. I don't know if I could box. You think you could wrestle me? You stand away but a chance boxing me will lead them wrestling me. I know, I know I do. And I was still giving both. My wrist was just in pain. Don't be like low. Low just says things that he never follows up on. I can beat you one by one. No. He's never gonna play me. My wrist would be catastrophically injured if I did it really hard. So I'm like, you know that, I can't do that. Do you want something else to edit for like two months? Hey, hey, hey, man. Fellows. I just don't want to do this next time. Do this, I don't want to do this. Can you sing it for me the right way? I don't know. Okay, this is the lyrics. Suicide ghost with the chrome on top for me. Oh, I got it better way. I'm just gonna record you doing that because I don't want to hit the lyrics. Uh-huh. All right, bet. Hey, I got 40, 45 more pounds to go. Do the set. Huh? Do the set. I just want to talk to you. You're dodging. All right, Willie, don't play sex sounds for me. I'll let you know when we're dead. All right, move, move, move, move. Willie, what the? Willie, it takes so much energy to rack and unrack this thing. Why did you just make me waste it? Suicide dream. I can't, I can't, I can't. I saw you. I need to start lower because it's been a month. I saw you hit a point where they were like, man, I actually have no choice but I have to lift this up because no one's gonna help me. Yeah, but that's, I always lift wasted out of spotter, so I know what it's like to almost die. I got real tired. I took a break, but I passed the line. You feel me? You're way faster than I thought. I haven't done this in a minute. Your abs, like, it just takes so much work to just carry around. Exactly, all right. That's what I would assume. I don't know what it's like, so. So Kurt has finished with 7.67 seconds. Oh, wow, yeah, believe me. No. You want to do it again?  No, no, no. I need your energy for some tire flips over there. Cause I slowed down, but next time you're gonna look so much faster. You're at strategy. Oh, Agents was a minute 41 seconds after that, so. Yeah! Why did you sound so upset saying that, Peter? Where's enthusiasm at? Say it again, happier. Come on. Agents was one second, or 1.41 seconds after that. Yo, yo, yo, yo, yo. You can't let him see you right now. You can't let him see you. Say hi. Yo, you actually got him. Woo! Can you check the mics? Hey, run a Hail Mary play. Let's go. Hail Mary. I can't throw that. I'm good. Well. Am I all the way down there? Yeah. Set! Okay, okay, we have to go all the way down there, Peter. So make them keep running far. Keep making go further. Keep going, keep going, keep going. Cause you have to check something in that backpack and Dean knows. That's why he's not going away. No, that way, that way, that way, that way. That way. We're literally running a Hail Mary. That way. That way, that way, that way. Down the way. Let's go, keep going, keep going. You're actually going to get him. You just have to run. Just like that way. Just run, literally just run. Okay, Peter. Plan B. Just throw it as far as you can towards the backpack. Are you happy? Nothing. Yeah, well, you just check as the cameraman, make sure the mic is okay, bro. Yes, yes, yes, yes. Hey, hey, hey. Yo, Kurt, yo, Kurt. Wow, you're right there. How convenient. How convenient that you're actually running. Yo, Kurt, can you check the black bag? Make sure the mic is still on. How convenient. Yo, that was actually worked out so perfectly. You didn't plan out or anything. This is actually the most unenjoyable part of lifting weights. It's just unwracking the weights. Well, I sit here and watch you. I gotta tell you. Hi, guys. Bro. My bad. I ain't mean it. You got it. Hi, guys. Guys, there's like five minutes of footage that I cut out between him just doing this. So I'm proud he finally did it. When I'm working out, I can only do five reps max because any more than that, and it becomes useless. I do this for strength. I don't do it to look good. Hey, you know what I'm saying? Sometimes in life, you just have to try and climb to the top. No matter how down low you are, you could be at the base floor, base camp. You still gotta climb up to Mount Everest. You feel me? And sometimes when you make it to the top, you just feel a lot like the air is clear and breathable. Or, dare. Got the footage? Is this what you, you have like almost 1.5 million. You got the footage though, right? And this is the content you want to give to your people. Yo, Lee, did you get the footage or not, bro? I'm just trying to think to myself, like, would I have made that catch last year? No, because I couldn't run.   So next time I play flight, he won't even score an I won't buck it. There's so many bugs. Down to Hondo, 50 more to go. Did it in style, did it in a year. That was the worst toss ever. But sometimes you have to throw bad throws to see what you can get out your receiver. Right there, I got a lot out of the curve. Can we do a backflip competition? Real quick? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Three, two, one. He won. He won. Yeah, I think he won that one right there. Yeah, cause it just took. It was cool though.  Yeah, I did. Huh? It's cool. It's cool. Amen.  Not perfect, but I'm getting better. On my second channel, I dropped a video on how I did it. It's pretty extreme, but I'm an extreme kind of guy, you feel me? You guys new to the channel you haven't already? Be sure to subscribe. If you haven't, if you've done that, then there's some videos on the screen right now, and I'm gonna catch you guys in the next one.


So let's look at Cayley's theorem properly. So I'm going to put it on the board. Cayley's theorem says that if I have a finite group with n elements, it is also morphic to a permutation group in n elements. Let's just remind ourselves what a permutation group is before we go. Remember the symmetric group, all the permutations, any subset of that is a permutation group. So if Cayley's theorem says that I have a group with n elements, remember this one? That was just the, all we had here was the fourth root of one. It has four elements. So I must have a permutation group with four elements. Now lucky for us, we've already looked at this. That if I look down any row, all the elements are unique and they are all there. And if I look down any columns, all of them are unique and they're all there. In other words, I can see each one of these as a permutation of my original set. So I can call this first one permutation 1, the second one permutation 2, the third one permutation 3, the fourth one permutation 4. Permutation 4 for instance takes 1 and turns it into negative i, negative 1 into i, i into 1, and negative i at maps that turns into maps 2 minus 1. And each of these mappings is unique and we've shown that already. So what does it mean remember to be isomorphic to? It means I must find a function that maps my finite group to the permutation group and that mapping must be a bijection. Now, I mean one thing we must have with that bijection at least. Remember bijection if I have 1, 2, 3, 4 in this set and I have a, b, c, d. There's a 1 to 1 and on to. So each one of these is mapped to in the second set and then each one of these is mapped to its own individual. So it's 1 to 1 and on to. So I better have the same number of elements in each and my permutation group here has four elements and my set inside of my finite group has n elements. So at least I have that as far as a bijection is concerned. And these are unique. I mean and we've already shown that each of these are unique. So we don't have any issues there. But what could, what possibly, what could this function be that shows this isomorphism between these two? And I'm going to claim that it is the following. Let's write it there. I'm going to say if I take on my first set which is my set here and I'm going to use just some generic. I'm going to say if I take any one of these elements g i and my binary operation with g j. So it's the binary operation with two of them and I might be equal to j. It doesn't matter. And I take a binary operation with yet another one and I could do this. Remember it is a group so associativity. I'm going to say that that maps to the permutation group i of the permutation group of j of this element here. I'm claiming that that's a bijection and that this mapping shows that there is, that these two sets are isomorphic. That's what I'm trying to show. And this is a composition of permutations. And the way that we're going to define this is to say that I'm going to take all my elements here one, negative one i, negative i. So no matter what these are g1, g2, g3, g4 till gn and I'm done that. And each of those rows I will say that that corresponds to that permutation group. This element corresponds to that permutation group. Let's see. That is my definition. So let's just see if this holds. Let's just take this for an example before we move on to showing that this is so for arbitrary elements hence proof of Cayley's theorem. Now with Cayley's theorem if you want to do that proof remember you first have got to show this uniqueness and completeness in all of this, all of the rows and columns and we've done that. So let's take for instance I'm going to say let's take g2, let's take g2 and g3 and g4. And I want to show that isomorphic to what I'm going, will then be p2 of p3 of g4. And in our instance here g2 I'm just going to call these g1, g2, g3, g4. So that would be g1, g2, g3, g4 and this n equals 4 in this instance. So I'm just using this as an example to illustrate to you what's going on. So g2 is actually minus 1. The binary operation in our instance here is multiplication. So I can actually say multiplication. g3 is i and multiplied by g4 and g4 is minus i. So if I do this minus that that gives me negative i times negative i and that is just equal to negative 1. And there it is negative i times negative i and that just equals 1. So let's see what is the permutation group. This is a, I'm combining these two permutations. So what does, and then we do the inner one first, the right hand one first. So what does p3 do to g4? So yes, so I'm asking what does, what does, what does g4, g4 is, remember that it is negative i. So what does p3 do? Yes, p3, what does it do to g4? It takes negative i, my negative i there, it takes it to 1. So I'm asking what the permutation group, if I take permutation, the permutation 2, what does it do to 1? Permutation 2, what does it do to 1? It maps it to negative 1. And lo and behold, I have negative 1 and I have negative 1. They're actually the same. So at least for this group, for one example, it holds. Now I can prove that it holds for all of them through brute force. But let's just be more, let's just be more generic about this. I'm going to suggest now that I take any gi, binary operation with gj, a binary operation net with gk. And I'm going to say that maps to the permutation group i on the permutation group j. So those two permutations with some element gk. So that's what I want to do. And remember what happens here with these permutation groups. Remember what we would do there is to write 1 minus 1i minus i. And then I would have 1 minus i, a minus 1i and minus i and it's this mapping. So what does, for instance, what does p3 do to g4? Now remember in this order that would be p3 there and that would be p2 there. So what does p2 do to 1? It takes it to negative 1. What does it do to minus 1? It takes it to 1. What does it do to i? It takes it to negative i. And what does it do to negative i? It takes it to i. And then p3, that would be its own. And I'm just asking then what do I do for this one and you follow it through and where it lands up and that's going to land up to negative 1. Remember this is what this composition of these permutations do. Okay. So let's just have a look. If we want this to be a bijection it's got to go, we've got to show this in both ways. So what happens if I do ji and, let's make this then g3 and what did we have here? g2 and g3 with g4. So what is g2 and g3? So there's g2 and g3. So there is that g3. I hope it's not too small, so there it is. And then remember this is a group, so there's closure here. So this g2 binary operation g3 is going to be one of these. It's going to be one of these. Irrespective of which one it is, what do I do if I take this one and I map it to, this is now going to be one of these and I map it to g4. Well it is actually any one of these and it's then going to be mapped to g4. So there's whatever this was, the secret that it was with g4. That's what it is. I mean that's exactly what it is. So p, the same is going to happen here. If this was then p3 what does it do to gk? And that was for us was 4. p3 what does it do to g4? There was g4, what would it map it to? It would map it to 2, so p3, there's g4. It would be g3, g3 and g4. So what would p3 do there which would correspond to g3? What does it map g4 to? Well it maps it to this thing which is g3 times g4. And what does p2 then do to all of that? Well it will be g2 mapped to g3 and g4 and these things are exactly the same. And all you have to just say to yourself now is that if I go from this and instead of taking specific elements 2, 3 and 4 I just take i, j and k and I take i, j and then some element k. I'm asking by definition what does it mean to take the pj of what does this permutation do to that element? Well by definition I've made this into the row that contains the g element of j so that will be gj. So my definition of writing this is gj and the binary operation gk. By definition that is what I'm saying. And by my definition of this because I've equated these numbers to each other, I'm asking by definition this means I'm taking g i and the binary operation with wherever this ended up with but generically it would just be that. So by definition that is what we're saying that is the definition of the permutation group of that element. And by that same argument on this side well this is what I have. I have g i, I have gj and I have gk and that's how I set it up and I land up with exactly the same thing.  So I'm just taking the permutation group of that and if I then take this we'll equate to this p i of taking the p j of g k. So it works the other way, it works towards the other side as well. I'm just asking what does it mean, what does this equate to?  So I can show both ways that it's exactly the same, it's exactly the same thing. So we've got this initial thing, this mapping of this set to this set showing that a finite group maps with n elements maps to a permutation group on n elements. Now remember there's four here, four factorials 24, so they're actually 24, 24 permutations. I'm taking a subset of that symmetric set of 24 permutations, I'm using a subset of that, a subset of the symmetric set is a permutation group and here's my permutation group of four elements and I'm just very clever in the way that I set it up that each of the elements here corresponds to a permutation group with the same number and then it flows very easily that you can show that this holds in both, in absolutely both directions choosing arbitrary permutation groups and an arbitrary element, arbitrary element, arbitrary element, arbitrary element, everything holds proof of Cayley's theorem.