How your small business can survive the recession. Are you worried about what the future holds for your business? You should be. What do you do to prevent your business from becoming another closed business statistic? In this video, I'm gonna give you the exact steps that you can take to prevent your business from going out of business and actually thrive in the future. And we're starting right now. Hey, I'm JR Fisher. Welcome to my channel. If you haven't subscribed, do so. Click that button down there. Don't forget to turn on all notifications. Be part of the Fisher family, the VIP group that gets notified every single time I do one of these videos. Now I've been online since 2009. I've sold all kinds of products, including digital and physical products. We've done millions of dollars in sales. I actually own a survival food company which is thriving during coronavirus. But I'm here to talk to you about what you can do to save your business. There's some things you definitely need to do. Now, are you having problems in your business right now? If so, put those comments below. I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Now let's jump into it and let's figure out what you can do to save your business. Oh yeah, and one other thing. I've got a free e-commerce course. It's a $97 value and I wanna give it to you. Absolutely free, it's down in the description there. You just click the link and learn. No credit card required. Now, by most accounts, we're going into a recession and it's probably gonna be kinda long and it's gonna get a lot worse. So what can you do to prevent your business from going out of business and more importantly, actually thriving during these times?  Now, however long you believe this recession is gonna be, I would always say prepared for a long, deep recession and that way you're not caught off guard. You need to also assume it's gonna get worse because it probably will and even if you make that assumption and it doesn't, you'll just be more prepared. Now, the real secret to surviving a downturn economy really is cash flow. So we're gonna talk about that in this video. I wanna share with you some tips that you can take right now to improve your cash flow. So let's get going. Now, there's actually four main ways that you can preserve your cash flow. The first one is to reduce and slow down your cash outflows. The next one obviously is to increase and speed up cash flows that are incoming. The next one is to position your company for a recession. And the last one, you gotta get people involved. You've gotta get your team to be more productive than they've ever been before. So the first one I said, number one, reduce and slow down outflows of cash. This is where your outflows go towards your expenses. It's time to look at all your expenses right now. Now, how can we do this? The first thing we can do is we can reduce our monthly rent. If you're renting a building, if you've got a brick and mortar, if you've got an office somewhere, you need to actually negotiate a lower monthly rent. Now, in times like these, landlords understand that they're gonna lose some tenants. So it's a great time for you to renegotiate your monthly rent payments. The next thing you wanna do, number two is get discounts on utilities. Now, some of us think you can't do that, but you actually can. Consider utilities like your water, power, internet, phones. You need to call the vendors of all these products and try to work out some type of deal. Many of these big, big utilities are willing to work with you on a payment plan or reduced amount monthly. Now, if it's something like an internet provider, something along those lines, let them know that you will be motivated to switch service providers if they can't work with you. And that will oftentimes wake them up and let them know that they're gonna have to work with you. Number three, cut wasteful discretionary spending. What do I mean by that? Look at all the subscriptions you have right now, whether it's magazines, whether it's associations, any of those things that you don't necessarily have to have, you're gonna wanna look at those and cut those. Now, don't go overboard. Don't cut the coffee machine expenditure for your employees. Don't cut birthday cakes when somebody has a birthday in the office. These things are actually morale boosters and they'll make your employees really care about you more because all the other businesses are gonna be cutting all expenses and they're not gonna be thinking about their employees and those little things that actually motivate them to wanna work there. Number four, you're gonna wanna lease rather than buy. Now, before you may have bought new computers for the office, but you may wanna consider leasing. And I know a lot of these vendors are gonna tell you, well, if you buy this copy machine or you buy this printer outright, of course you're gonna save on the price, but that saving on the price, if you run out of money in six months won't make much difference if you don't have a business anymore.  Number five, pay payables later. Now, this is not something you just wanna automatically do. What you wanna do is contact your vendors, your suppliers and say, hey, we're having a problem right now, can I get 60-day terms? Can I get 90-day terms? Can I get 120-day terms? And that will free up some cash to help you run your business. Now, you never know when having cash on hand for an extra 15 or 30 days can actually save your business. Now, the flip side of this is, if your vendors do not wanna reduce their price or they wanna give you longer terms, you may offer them, if I pay upfront, if I pay sooner, will you give me a discount? A lot of them are short of cash also, and if you offer to pay them right now, a lump sum, you can oftentimes get a discount off what you would normally pay. And the next thing I said is to increase your cash flow that's coming in. Here's how we can do that. You can do exactly what you are trying to do with vendors. You can contact people who owe you money and let them know if they pay you now and they pay you the full amount now instead of using the terms that you had set up, that you'll give them a one or 2% discount, and that will increase the cash that you have coming in so you can use it for your bills. Now, be careful on this, and you're gonna have people contacting you too, so you kinda gotta play both sides of the fence. But make sure you're not offering terms right now. Just because you did it in the past, you're not a credit card company. So try to get away from the terms, let them know that you need to be paid upfront, and offering that one or 2% discount if they do that can oftentimes motivate them to wanna do it. You also wanna look at your receivables. I know a lot of you guys would let a vendor slide 30 or 60 days and not really say anything about it, but now's the time you need to kinda tighten up a little bit there and let them know you do need the cash and they do need to pay you when it's due. Now, there's kind of a saying here about the squeaky wheel gets oiled.  You'll wanna call them the next day too, sometimes twice or sometimes three times a day, send them emails and phone calls because everybody's gonna be contacting businesses at this point and the squeaky wheel gets oiled. So if you're the one who contacts them more often, more frequently, and nice about it, but more frequently, you're gonna find that you're gonna collect a whole lot more money than there's other companies that notify them once a month. Of course, you want to keep your existing customers. Now, how are you gonna do that? You don't wanna cut so much that you can't service these customers properly. If you have a better priced product in the market, remind them of that. We just went through the coronavirus thing and we're selling cases of meat and we haven't increased our prices in five years. So when somebody would contact us and say, hey, your price seems high or can you give us a discount, I would let them know. I'd say we haven't increased our prices in five years. This is actually a great price and we could have increased the prices because of the fact that there was such a high demand that we chose not to do so. Next thing is you wanna double down on your best customers.  You wanna let them know you really appreciate their business. You wanna give them better service than you ever have before because a lot of companies are gonna be looking for your customers right now and if you're not treating them right, you're gonna lose them to another vendor. And you could do little things like friendly reminders, call them, email them, send them birthday cards, whatever occasion is up, give them cards for that, send them gift boxes. All those little things will make a big difference when you're trying to keep customers. Now, the third thing I says was position your business for the recession. You know, in a business environment that's a recession, it's very different from the years that are good years. People look at things differently, they spend differently. So let's check out how we can do that. The first thing I always like to look at is lowering inventory costs. So we're gonna say inventory costs. How much of your cash is actually tied up in inventory? Do you really need a hundred units of an item? Could you get by with 50? That way you don't have your cash tied up in inventory. Next thing is revamp your product line or marketing campaign. You know, during a recession, people spend a whole lot differently and if all the products out in the market are all the same still as they were before the recession, the only thing they're gonna go for is price. What extra value can you offer your customer? What can you show them that your product is better than the next person? You know, a lot of people will race to the lowest price, but that's not always the best deal if you have a better product. Look for opportunities to leapfrog the competition. What do I mean by that? There's gonna be a lot of business out there that is gonna be available to you. A lot of those people that were your competitors out there may not be treating their customers great. Now's a good time to really vamp up your marketing campaigns and go after those customers that your competitors have. And the last thing is team productivity. Everybody's gotta step up right now. Everybody's gotta work a little bit harder. Everybody's gotta do a little bit more. Not if they feel like it because if they wait until they feel like it, they'll never do anything. And the point of this is if you step up now and you work harder now, you're gonna have a business. If you don't, you could actually lose that business. And the next thing I wanna tell you, and I hate to say it, but cut once, cut deep, and do it sooner than later. And what I mean is if you've gotta get rid of people, go ahead and do it.  It's gonna hurt, it's gonna hurt them, it's gonna hurt you, but if that's what you gotta do to make your business survive, that's what you gotta do.  Your family cannot pay anybody if you go out of business. So you're gonna have to cut the people that you just don't need.  Now the next thing you gotta do is reduce hours before you reduce salaries. And what do I mean by that? I mean that instead of cutting somebody's pay and expecting them to do the same amount of work, if you've got hourly employees, the best thing you can do is actually cut hours. Instead of cutting their salaries. Because if you cut the hours instead, they look at it as, well, I get to work less, but I'm still making the same amount per hour. If you cut their hourly wage, they look at it, well, I've gotta do the same work and I'm doing it for less and they're gonna resend you. Don't forget, you gotta cut your own salary too, okay? You gotta watch your own expenses. If you're cutting everybody else's and still paying yourself the same amount of money, kinda unfair and people will resent that. Next thing is you wanna get all your employees on the same page. And what I mean by that is everybody's gotta understand why you're doing what you're doing. If you just cut people, if you just cut people's salaries, if you start cutting all these expenses and nobody understands that the reason you're having to do this is so that you can actually stay in business, they will understand it a whole lot better because the people that are left, the people that you haven't laid off, understand that all these cuts are necessary so that they have a job at all. That's not altogether bad to actually show them your expenses, to show them the difference of income that you have coming in in the expenditures. And once they see that and they understand that in their heads, they'll get it that you're actually trying to save their jobs too. Now, keeping your business afloat during every session, it's tough, okay? It's tough decisions and it takes tough management. But you're tough, right? You can handle this, right?  So make these decisions upfront and do it now. These are super important decisions to make now so that you don't have to make the same decision six months down the road and it's gonna cost you even more money then. Now, have you been affected by the downturn in business? Have you been affected by what's going on in the world? Put your comments below. Put in there what you've done, what you haven't done, the issues you're running into. I'll be happy to answer any questions that you have. I really appreciate you watching this video. Don't forget, I've got a $97 Ecommerce course that I'm giving away absolutely free. All you gotta do is click the link and learn no credit card required. Do me a favor also if you haven't, make sure you subscribe to this channel, that big subscribe button down there and turn on all notifications right next to it. When you do that, you become part of the Fisher family, the VIP group that gets notified every time I do a video so you don't have to go looking for it. I really appreciate you listening to this video and I'll see you in the next one. Hey, thanks for watching my video. Don't forget to subscribe to my channel and click that little bell right here so you can be notified every time I do a new video. Also, click on one of those videos there. Keep watching on my channel.


I think what Made in America means is that entrepreneurial way of thinking and challenging the status quo. For me, it means to make something, to dream of something, and to actually do it. It is risk, it is reward, it is courage. For me, it's to create a legacy for my children, just working for myself. Made in America, for me, it's opportunity. It's about being resilient. It's how what we go through makes us who we are. Watch the full episodes of Made in America, a Go Daddy series.


Good evening. Yeah, I'm Yuan from Apple. I'm building Kubernetes infrastructure and platform at Apple I have been a very active and code contribute to Kubernetes projects and related projects in the last three or four years this is my 7th cube calm, but the first one in Europe also my 8th talk, but the first Nightingale talk, so it's such a big stage. So Let me Take a quick and photo that I can brag to my daughter Okay, so You can see my name We'll be a proud dad Okay, let's get to back to the topic of my talk and the power where scheduling and in Kubernetes. I I hope yeah, I can to I will bring the attention awareness to it in the next five Minutes So why? So the power outage or the service time the cause the service time is the top one reason in data center and the clusters so now the Kubernetes as being used by more and more applications and Also, the cluster size right is getting larger and larger We have a high risk of this over know that the power supply on the other hand And if you are familiar with the data center power infrastructure We typically also oversubscribed and a power infrastructure to maximize the capital investment Unfortunately and today and the could that is scheduled still only focus on the computer resource like a CPU memory and storage Although and then those are Indirectly correlated to power consumption, but they are not perfect indicate of the power consumption for there are a few reasons One is the request like the port request and worker request don't exactly, right? Represented actual utilization also the power and if you calculate the power consumption It's a correlation to the resource utilization, but they are still idle power other factors can affect it So now this correlation So we argue and we need to bring and integrate this power awareness or make this power as a first citizen as Part of the Kubernetes and we need a bad power management in Kubernetes So what to do here? So the first thing is to prevent the Overload of the power supply. So we need to restrict or limit the aggregator of the power consumption of the workload to this and the power secret at Different level from server to rack enclosure or to the entire data center this power cabin The second is the power awareness and about the power distribution when the schedule to make a decision We are to place the workload. We should make sure right we can better balance this power consumption across the Compute and the power infrastructure to minimize or reduce the risk So how to do it The first thing we need to when they introduce right this and a power Related data from a power topology to the power monitoring data as well as the power model into our the basic and the Kubernetes the Resource or the basic data the secondly that we need a set of the power aware or power efficient the algorithm to support this power capping and the power distribution in particularly We are proposing at two key scheduled plugins. The first one is the field to plug in it will Exclude those nodes or racks infrastructure That already have a very high risk of the overloading the power supply The second one called a scoring in the plug in its preference Right choose the better nodes a better rack to run or load to better balance or reduce this risk to summarize we need and bring this and the power awareness and Make the power of first the citizen in the Kubernetes So including this power to politics and the power monitoring data as well as the scheduling algorithms So also and I used to work on not in a power management data center management in other domain We should leverage and take advantage of the existing work. We are not going to invent a will so this talk of course just a very high level like I said bring this awareness to the community and Another work we can down and even like a previous talk and mohawk mentioned about the copying manage Carbon emissions as well as sustainability So I hope this talk and we inspire the community To work toward and the better power management of sustainability In Kubernetes in the entire communities I also hope I will bring more about these topics in the future and the cube calm Maybe more in the in the deep dive. Okay, that's it I hope everyone enjoying the rest of the conference also one thing in case and you miss it And I highly recommend it go to see the seeds of the tulip flowers. It's amazing and you want and Want to miss it. Thank you very much


You may have heard the expression, knowledge is power. Well, today we're going to give you more power to control your diet and lifestyle by giving you the facts. Welcome to the Nutrition Facts Podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Michael Greger. Today we continue our series on how industries impact dietary and health guidelines and pick things up by taking a close look at corporate criticism of scientific nutrition literature. While randomized controlled trials are highly reliable in assessing interventions like drugs, they're harder to do with diet. Dietary diseases can take decades to develop. It's not like you can give people placebo food, and it's hard to get people to stick to assigned diets, especially for the years it would take to observe effects on hard endpoints like heart disease or cancer. That's why we have to use observational studies of large numbers of people in their diets over time to see which foods appear to be linked to which diseases. And interestingly, if you compare data obtained from observational population studies versus randomized trials, on average there's little evidence for significant differences between the findings. Not just in the same direction of effect, but of the same general magnitude of the effect and about 90% of the treatments they looked at. But wait, what about the hormone replacement therapy disparity I talked about in the last video? It turns out when you go back and look at the data, it was just a difference in timing in terms of when the premarin was started, and they actually showed the same results after all. But even if observational trials did provide lower quality evidence, maybe we don't need the same level of certainty when we're telling someone to eat more broccoli or drink less soda, compared to whether or not you want to prescribe someone some drug. After all, prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States. It goes heart disease, cancer, then doctors. 100,000 Americans wiped out every year from the side effects of prescription drugs taken as directed. So given the massive risks, you better have rock-solid evidence that there are benefits that outweigh the risks.  In the end, the industry-funded sugar paper concluding that the dietary guidelines telling people to cut down aren't trustworthy because they're based on such quote-unquote low-quality evidence is an example of the inappropriate use of the drug trial paradigm in nutrition research. You say, yeah, but what were the authors supposed to do? If grade is the way you judge guidelines and you can't blame them, but no, there are other tools like, for example, Nutragrade, a scoring system specifically designed to assess and judge the level of evidence in nutrition research. One of the things I like about Nutragrade is that it specifically takes funding bias into account. So industry-funded trials are downgraded. No wonder the industry-funded authors chose the inappropriate drug method instead. Helm is another one. Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle medicine specifically designed because existing tools such as great or not viable options when it comes to questions that you can't fully address through randomized controlled trials. In a way, each research method has its own unique contribution. In a lab, you can explore the exact mechanisms. RCTs can prove cause and effect, and huge population studies can study hundreds of thousands of people at a time for decades.  For example, we had randomized controlled trials showing trans fats increased risk factors for heart disease. And we had population studies showing that the more trans fats people ate, the more heart disease they had. And so taken together, these studies forged a strong case for the harmful effects of trans fat consumption on heart disease. And as a consequence, it was largely removed from the U.S. food supply, preventing as many as 200,000 heart attacks every year. Now, it's true. We never had randomized controlled trials looking at hard endpoints like heart attacks and death because that would take years of randomizing people to eat like canisters of Crisco every day. You can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good when there are tens of thousands of lives at stake. Public health officials have to work with the best available balance of evidence there is. It's like when we set tolerable upper limits for lead exposure, or PCBs. It's not like we randomized kids to drink different levels of lead and saw who grew up to have tolerable brain damage. You can't run those kinds of experiments, so you have to just pull in evidence from as many sources as possible and make your best approximation. Even if RCTs, randomized controlled trials, randomized controlled trials are unavailable or impossible to conduct, there's plenty of evidence from observational studies on the nutritional causes of many cancers, such as on red meat increasing the risk of colorectal cancer. So if dietary guidelines aiming at cancer prevention were to be assessed with the drug design grade approach, they'd reach the same conclusion that the sugar paper did, low quality evidence. And so no surprise, a meat industry funded institution hired the same dude who helped conceive and design the sugar industry funded study and boom, lead author saying we could ignore the dietary guidelines to reduce red and processed meat consumption because they used grade methods to rate the certainty of evidence and though current dietary guidelines recommend limiting meat consumption, their results predictably demonstrated that the evidence was of low quality. Before I dive deep into the meat papers, one last irony about the sugar paper. The authors used the inconsistency of the exact recommendations across sugar guidelines over a 20-year period to raise concerns about the quality of the guidelines. Now obviously we would expect guidelines to evolve, but the most recent guidelines show remarkable consistency with one exception. The 2002 Institute of Medicine guideline that said a quarter of your diet could be straight sugar without running into deficiencies, but that outlier was partly funded by the Coke Pepsi Cookie Candy Funded Institute that is now saying, see, since recommendations are all over the place, thanks in part to us, they can't be trusted. In our next story, the meat industry comes up with a perversion of evidence-based medicine. A series of articles published in the Annals of Internal Medicine culminated in a recommendation suggesting people keep eating their red and processed meat. Nutrition researchers savaged these articles. The chair of nutrition at Harvard called it a very irresponsible public health recommendation, and the past Harvard nutrition chair was even less restrained. It's the most egregious abuse of data I've ever seen, said Walt Willett. They're just layers and layers of problems. Let us start to pick through these layers. First of several serious weaknesses was that the analyses and recommendations were largely based on this so-called grade criteria, which I talked about in my last video. The authors aired and applying the grade tool since that was designed for drug trials. Grade automatically scores observational studies as low or very low scores for certainty of evidence, which is exactly what you want when you're evaluating evidence from drug trials. You want a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to prove the drugs' risks and benefits. However, the infeasibility for conducting randomized clinical trials on most dietary, lifestyle, and environmental exposures makes the criteria inappropriate in these areas, since it would involve controlling people's daily diet and following them for decades. You can't do a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of red meat and other foods on heart attacks or cancer for dietary and lifestyle factors. It's impossible to use the same standards for drug trials. Like I mentioned, telling one group of people to smoke a pack of cigarettes every day for the next 20 years to prove that cigarettes cause lung cancer. And how could you make it double-blind, like have the control group smoke placebo cigarettes? Yet in the meat papers, they were downgrading studies due to lack of blinding. Well, duh, I mean, in nutrition trials, how are you going to blind people to the fact of what they're eating? Grade is just the wrong tool for diet studies. In fact, the authors admit that the reason their recommendations differ from all the others is that other guidelines have not used the grade approach. And the reason is you can't randomize people to smoke, avoid physical exercise, breathe polluted air, or eat a lot of sugar or red meat and then follow them for 40 years to see if they die. Now, that doesn't mean you have no evidence, it just means you have to look at the evidence in a more sophisticated way. And alternative approaches to grade exist, like, for example, Nutragrade, which have specifically been developed to evaluate evidence from studies of nutritional and lifestyle factors. So are the authors appeals to standards of evidence motivated by a genuine interest in getting to the bottom of it or just to advance the financial interests of industry, as the same lead author had done previously at the behest of soda and candy companies? The tool he employed in his meat and sugar studies could be misused to discredit all sorts of well-established public health warnings, like the link between second-hand smoke and heart disease, air pollution and health problems, physical inactivity and chronic disease or trans fat. Industries could use it to sow doubt in any field where randomized controlled trials are not feasible, such as climate change. What are you going to have, some placebo planet? Strict adherence to grade guidelines could even be used to question the link between smoking and lung cancer. I know you can't randomize people to smoke, but can't you randomize people to quit a randomized control trial of the effect on aged men of advice to stop smoking? Of those randomized to quit, 13.7% died within the study window, whereas of those in the control group who got no special instruction, only 12.9% died. In other words, it didn't work. Disappointingly, the researchers concluded, we find no evidence at all of any reduction in total mortality.  Of course not. Anyone see the fatal flaw? They didn't randomize people to quit. They randomized people to advice to quit smoking. It's not like they could lock people in a room for a few years. At last follow-up, the stop smoking group was smoking 8 cigarettes a day compared to 12 cigarettes a day in the control group. So no surprise, there was no difference in mortality since there was hardly any difference in smoking and the same thing with diet. There have been massive randomized dietary trials, the Women's Health Initiative, the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial, that wasted hundreds of millions of dollars because people just flat out failed to follow the dietary advice. So the groups ended up eating similar diets at the end, so had similar disease outcomes, just like the randomized smoking quit trial. And it's not like the failure was a result of inexperienced investigators. These trials were conducted by some of the very best research teams who invested enormous efforts to achieve their goals. But it just shows you can't really run decade-long randomized trials that require changes in eating behavior. People just won't do it. Randomized controlled trials couldn't even show an effect on mortality of smoking, which is pretty remarkable, considering that smoking is one of the most powerful known risk factors in the world. So basically the foregone conclusion, putting any kind of junk to the test in this matter, would echo the New Meat Report conclusion that people should eat whatever they want and do whatever they want. It's like a hijacking of evidence-based medicine. Of course we want the best evidence possible, but the whole process is now being manipulated and misused to support subverted or perverted agendas. It's very exciting and attention-grabbing to say there's no need to reduce meat intake. It's less exciting to say we reviewed studies to evaluate the validity using a system not meant to evaluate the validity of these studies and what we found is nothing. When asked whether physicians can advise persons whether a salad is healthier than a bowl full of sugar, one of the senior co-authors of the meat papers responded that physicians should tell persons that the quality of evidence is low, so it depends almost entirely on their preferences. When green criteria do not allow us to strongly recommend against smoking a cigarette with your bowl of sugar, we believe that alternative grading systems are preferable. Did you know that the same person paid by big sugar to downplay the risk of sugar was paid by big meat to downplay the risk of meat? Here's the story. A series of articles published in the Annals of Internal Medicine recommending people just keep eating their meat was decried by nutrition researchers as irresponsible and unethical, a travesty of science, an assault on public health, and the most egregious abuse of evidence that they had ever seen. There were calls for retraction even before it was published from eminent public health leaders, from a former U.S. search in general, former president of the American College of Cardiology, and the directors of Preventive Medicine and Nutrition Institutes from Harvard, Yale, Tufts, and Stanford. In my last video, I explained how the method by which they manipulated the science but never really got to the why. I mean, the lead author's similar attempt to discredit the sugar guidelines was explicitly paid for by an industry front group funded by the likes of Coca-Cola, Dr. Pepper, Mars, Candy Bars, and Pepsi. But if you look at the meat paper that the panelists declared conflicts of interest, they all say they didn't have any, including the lead author who was involved in the sugar study whose primary funder wasn't just representing big soda and candy, but the likes of McDonald's and one of the largest meat packers in the world. Yet Johnston didn't disclose that as a potential conflict of interest when he switched from exonerating sugar to exonerating meat. What did he have to say for himself? Even though the sugar study was published in 2016, he got the money for it in 2015 outside of the three-year mandatory disclosure window. This is the same guy who said the industry front group had no role in writing their paper until the Associated Press revealed the truth and the journal had to publish a correction. But Johnston doubled down this time, saying it is tenuous at best to suggest that his earlier work on sugar had any influence on how his team made the new meat recommendations. The important thing is we have no relationship with the meat industry. Oh, really? A few months later, the truth came out. Correction in the so-called NutriRex panel meat recommendations. Oops! Bradley Johnston failed to indicate he had gotten a grant from Texas A&M AgriLife, which gets millions of dollars a year from the meat industry to do things like run beef boot camp, or espouse the health benefits of beef brisket, or promote the celebration of National Bacon Day. After all, Texas A&M AgriLife serves pork producers to improve pork producer profitability. This is the group that not only gave Dr. No Relationship with the Meat Industry Johnston a direct grant for over 75 grand, but they officially joined the whole NutriRex consortium to provide, as Dr. Johnston explained, generous support to impact nutrition-related decision making and policy in North America and beyond. Yet none of this was disclosed in the paper. No even potential conflict of interest, yet they had formed a partnership with an arm of Texas A&M partially funded by the beef industry, to the tunes of millions a year from the beef industry alone. Oops! In fact, Patrick Stover missed no conflicts of interest is the director of AgriLife, and a month before the meat paper was published, Bradley Johnston was offered and accepted a tenured position at Texas A&M AgriLife was already working for them when it was published, but didn't think to mention it. So when the Annals initially sent out a press release, which they later corrected, saying no need to reduce rent or process meat consumption for good health, they may have been simply acting as a mouthpiece for meat industry propaganda. The suit of science presented in the Annals meat papers appears to have been written solely to create doubt and confusion in the wider population. The misleading recommendations were not intended to convince scientists who clearly understand the nature of the relationship between meat and health, and for that matter, sugar and health. The suit of science is presented solely to create doubt and confusion in the wider population. Frankly, industry will do what it needs to do to push as much of its product into the world as it can, and so will do what it needs to do to obfuscate the relationship between its products and human and planetary health. They've done it with tobacco, fossil fuels, Monsanto's Roundup, sugar, and now meat. We would love it if you could share with us your stories about reinventing your health through evidence-based nutrition. Go to nutritionfacts.org slash testimonials. We may share it on our social media to help inspire others. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, or studies mentioned here, please go to the Nutrition Facts Podcast landing page. There you'll find all the detailed information you need, plus links to all the sources we cite for each of these topics. For a timely text on the pathogens that cause pandemics, you can order the e-book, audiobook, or hard copy of my last book, How to Survive a Pandemic. For recipes, check out my second to last book, How Not to Diet Cookbook. It's beautifully designed with more than 100 recipes for delicious and nutritious meals. And all the proceeds I receive from the sales of all my books goes to charity. NutritionFacts.org is a non-profit, science-based public service where you can sign up for free daily updates on the latest in nutrition research via bite-sized videos and articles. Everything on the website is free. There's no ads, no corporate sponsorship. It's strictly non-commercial. I'm not selling anything. I just put it up as a public service as a labor of love as a tribute to my grandmother, whose own life was saved with evidence-based nutrition.


Being a skater I was always of course looking at skateboarder magazine and I also always wanted to go surfing Surfing for me was a big dream skating. I could do surfing. I never could I was you know 15 14 13 Whatever here in the mountains of the barrier. You just don't surf, but I always wanted to do it and So the first time I saw us images of snowboarding was Somewhere 76 77 maybe 78. I don't know in the skateboarder magazine Guys like Chuck Barford, Tom Sims, you know those guys and I was immediately I was thinking this is it This is my way into to get into surfing really so that's how I started just magazines skateboard magazines This to me looked like the perfect idea for making a snowboard so I built this thing I just put some grip tape on it from skateboard stuff and these are actually a Back in the day they had these for the heel for cross-country skis So I got a bunch of those for grip and this is a inner tube from a bicycle so essentially you You put your feet under the rubber like that with just soft winter boots a little bit of a binding and that's it That's all you need We're still pushing the powder It actually still looks pretty cool even today, you know And of course I was always trying to make a kicker a launch off of this is actually a tree stump We're trying to launch off a tree stump But yeah, I mean of course you were trying to push as much as you could Perfect 80s styling with the mullet with the full suits We was really about getting that surf vibe of course trying to get some air The two boards you see there are basically that waterski board and that first sims board that I got from the US I think this is probably one of the first snowboards that was ever Actually shipped to Europe This is the original invoice from Sims, but sims pro ski board 140 centimeters Leash t-shirt Stickers there's no running base. No steel edges just some metal fins There's no bindings, but the design concept of the binding is basically the same You know from this to this board was a leap in technology. It was amazing because this had so much more flotation It's twice as wide. It's the same length twice as wide. It looked amazing to me. This is look so sexy and You're hiking the little mountains around here I didn't really have a desire to push anymore because I thought this is snowboarding surfing and the soft snow But of course when I saw this other stuff It was like wow and then of course got involved in that and became a pro rider and everything Must be mean something like 86 or seven or so. I don't know we have to have a face You have to have a face like that yet. We're like Maybe I shouldn't have pulled this out. I think You guys were not even born when this happened. So don't laugh Can make temperature temperature team funds no one can Really was that 80s fun vibe that everybody was like Having fun somehow, you know, I remember that one, you know, we did a photo shoot So we did a lot of photo shoots for clothing companies those days.  Writing in shorts was a big thing, you know, like this one to like writing in shorts is important t-shirt shorts spring powder Just had to do it. But this is again, you know, I was I was trying to serve don't forget that There was no coolness factor. There was nobody that was like cool or uncool, you know Everybody was so stoked. I think the best thing was really that the general vibe was very positive It was impossible to be uncool just not possible because nobody was cool


Five shades in a drugstore product is pretty freaking amazing. Let me pull up the website.  Usually it's like two, maybe four, but let's see. We have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventy, eighteen, nineteen, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three shades darker than me. Wow. Okay, well let me clarify. There's twenty-three different shades past my color, meaning there's my color and then there's like maybe different variations of my skin tone with different undertones, but there definitely are some deeper tones. Judging by just these little photos on the website, there's about one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight really like deep tones. It looks pretty even, like there's a good amount of pale, there's a good amount of medium and there's a good amount of dark. So bravo to NYX for creating so many shades so everybody gets a color to choose from. Now I do want to point out that this is NYX, okay NYX, they got that mula. So they're a brand that I would expect to be able to create that many shades. Now if you're a brand new company or like some new name, okay maybe you only have eight shades right now and you know you're growing, but these larger brands, this is how you should be coming. Correct. If this is your first Foundation Friday, welcome to my channel. Make sure you hit that subscribe button and the bell so you're notified as soon as I post a new video. I post foundation videos on Fridays and curly hair videos on Sundays. Did you press the subscribe button yet? Yeah, I mean we could just wait. I'll wait for you to push the button, it's okay. Back to the foundation, besides the awesome 45 shade range, I also love how affordable it is. This is $15. So it's a little bit more than like maybe a drugstore price, but definitely a lot more affordable than a high end foundation. It does have a pump nozzle, which is what I prefer to pump my foundation onto a beauty blender or a brush. And let's see, you get one fluid ounce as a product just like every other foundation.  So now let me backtrack to when I first put on this foundation and show you the coverage, the consistency, and all that jazz. Alrighty, let's get started. I have three shades that I stole from set. I mean, borrowed from when I was on set with Nix. So I have Caramel, Cinnamon, and Golden. Let's see what is going to be the best match. Starting with Caramel, this is supposed to have an olive undertone. So let's see. Okay, Caramel. Now let's try Cinnamon. Cinnamon is supposed to have a neutral undertone. And then I have Golden. Golden is supposed to be medium deep with a neutral undertone. And I have learned that neutral is usually the best for me. Yeah, that's gonna be nice. I'm gonna go with the Golden one. Okay, let's keep it in the Nix family and find a Nix primer. I'm sure I have one. I do have the Nix Angel Veil. And I have the Nix Shine Killer. That's important. I'm kind of feeling that one. Supposed to eliminate the look of oil and shine so face stays matte and fresh all day long. Well, that's what we're testing today, buddy. I do like this consistency. It's like a gel. And it glides on very smooth. No white cast. All right, now I'm grabbing my color Golden. Nope, not you. Nope, not you. And I'm going to put it on my damp beauty blender. Let's do one pump.  Let's check this coverage, shall we? Nice. That coverage is good. Off of just the first dab too. How far one pump went? Let's do another good pump. application of the foundation on its own. Now, even though this is claiming to have a neutral undertone, I thought I'm getting a little bit more of a warm or golden undertone. What do you guys think? It looks a little a little warm, but I kind of like that little extra bit of color. A little bit more of a tan during these winter days. So I won't have to be like the exact paler shade that I am in the winter. And I think it's matching with my chest just fine. It is going on very matte right now, but not like a I'm dry type of matte. It still feels very breathable. It's not too heavy or cakey. It blended out very nicely. Did a really good job with coverage. So now let me finish the rest of my face. And we're back. Wow, the power of hair and makeup, right? So at this point, I'm really loving how the foundation looks. I look extremely matte, like there is not oil or shine in sight. I mean, besides my highlight, but that's supposed to be there on purpose. But it's looking very, very like matte professional slay right now. And I'm feeling pretty confident that this is going to hold up throughout the day. Now I just went to the website and I found some more claims. This foundation that's supposed to be lightweight. I would agree. Waterproof. Don't know if I'm going to be going swimming today, but that's good to know. Pigmented AF in the description right now. Are they allowed to say that in the description? I thought they like stood for something, but they literally mean like really, really pigmented. Our new Can't Stop Won't Stop Full Coverage Foundation hustles as hard as you do. I am a hustler. Comfy liquid formula. It is pretty comfortable right now. 45 flattering tones that don't transfer. Let's try that out right now, shall we? All right, grabbing my nice fluffy white robe. Let's see if it transfers. Ready? Are you ready? Transfer test. Looking pretty white to me. This is like a good boyfriend test.  Husband, you're like, wow. That's good people. Not a speck of brown in sight. Perfect for side chicks. What else is on here? Glides on smooth, delivering matte coverage and color that stays true for up to 24 hours. That's a long time. I'm not going to be able to wear this for 24 hours because I do want to sleep tonight, but I'm wearing it for a long time guys and I'm going to come back and I'm going to show you how it looks. It's supposed to control, shine, mattify your complexion all day long. These are some strong claims, nicks. These are strong, but it doesn't stop there. Wow. It really can't stop, won't stop. This foundation is non-comedogenic, suitable for normal, oily or combination or sensitive skin types. So it's claiming to be good for everyone. Well, I definitely fall in the oily department. So that's what we'll be testing today. So it is currently 3pm. I'm going to wear this for as long as possible, come back and show you how well the foundation did on my oily skin throughout the day. And I'm back. I know the foundation is called Can't Stop, Won't Stop, but I need to stop right now because it's midnight. So that means I've had this foundation on for a total of nine hours. So looking at the foundation right now under these very bright lights, it still doesn't even look that bad under these lights. It usually always looks better in person than it does on camera. Like the camera just kind of shows everything even more, but they give you all a good look.  So for wearing this foundation for a total of nine hours straight, not touching my skin, not blotting at all, we're at a very nice place. And this is on me, someone with very, very oily skin. So I think this foundation did a really good job on oily skin, probably even better on normal skin and possibly amazing on dry skin, maybe even too dry. But at this point, I like to use my oil absorbing sheets to see how much oil actually comes off my skin. These are from CVS. You could use any brand you want. They kind of all do the same thing. And let's see. Good as new, right? So this is, this is the oil from one side. Let's keep on going. So this is how much oil came off my skin. It actually does look like a lot of oil, even though it didn't look that bad on my actual skin. This is also supposed to be transfer proof. I do see a little bit of brown on here, but it's not like big chunks, but that oil might make it transfer after, you know, nine hours. So let's get all your hugs in in the beginning of the day. So now I'm back to my matte self. I like how it looks right now. I think my cover just still there. This could definitely go on for more hours. So overall, I'm very satisfied with the Can't Stop Won't Stop Foundation. I do encourage you guys to see if you can find a shade in your color. Give it a try and then come back to this video. Let me know how well it worked on your skin. Let us know if you have dry skin, normal, oily combination, whatever. So we can get an idea on who this foundation will work the best for. You can find this foundation at NYX stores. Yes, they have their own stores now. Ulta, Target, probably CVS, Walgreens. They should be at every drugstore because it's drugstore foundation. It's only $15 and let's not forget that there's 45 shades to choose from. Before you go, make sure you give me a thumbs up and subscribe. I post foundation Fridays on Fridays and curly hair videos on Sunday. And we gotta stay connected. Follow me on Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat at Ms. Bianca Renee. I'll see you guys next time. Thanks for watching Bianca Renee today.


What's up everybody Jason here from jaspyscasebreak.com shows a 1920 panini contenders optic two box break Pick your team number 35 just sold out Where we randomize the pelicans to the customers that buy two or more teams in this break? So how to get entered guys just buy two teams you buy two teams you go one entry into the pelicans give away By four teams you get two entries by six teams you get three entries Etc. Etc. If you only buy one team you will not be entered but good luck to you.  Oh, Jim. Let's alphabetize and see who's in for the promo David got four spots here. So that's two entries for you David. Good luck man Eric with four that's two entries for you as well Matt L with four that's two entries for you as well Nick Stober You have nine entries which will be four spots You had that 10th team I'd give it to you Sean with two and So Min with three Or someone with six. That's three entries Sean with just one. There you go boom Let's roll it Two and a five seven times. Good luck. Number one gets the pelicans one two three four And fifth and final time or two and a five seven times are five six seven So men look at that Congrats, man There you go. You just won the pelicans. I don't know Pete. Sometimes Joe just puts all these crazy tabs Let me see. I don't even know what that means. It looks like Someone was talking about a certain mini golf course on grass I guess I have no idea So nine holes natural grass north San Diego blackout turf nut and PGA golf pro. Yeah, I don't know honestly Pascal Siakam and Zach Levine little practice Are you really what we actually have a couple customers of ours that either are either Are part of the PGA somehow as a professional or have been part of the PGA and work at certain golf courses to be honest So That's cool though, man Gordon Hayward and Keras Leverts Why do you call it that Mike? And man the Atlanta Hawks just keep hitting just three straight Hawks hits Bruno Fernando last two boxes had two camera reticent redemptions and Bruno Fernanda now the third one out of the four Matt with the Hawks Let's go to the last box guys remember fresh case in the next one when I post it up fresh master Not even in our master case superstars daika we got a Luca Donchich and a uniformity of Brandon Ingram Luca Dallas Maverick's going to David Pelican they're going to zoom in You got a blue drew holiday another one for the pelican I don't 99 and we got tied to Rome tonight and I blew for the Phoenix Suns Go in Eric All right, you guys there you go. I'm gonna top of this. I'll go with some more fifty five point top loaders But here you go very nice stuff Nice Luca right there, and then this was the first box These are the last two boxes of the entire master case guys number thirty six will be from a fresh master We can get it on going tonight guys Jaspies case breaks calm


If you enjoy science and are fascinated by how things work, you've got great analytical and creative problem-solving skills and strong maths, but yet you really like to do practical tasks then a mechanical or mechatronics degree is the one for you. Mechanical engineers don't just design and figure out how to build machines. They design planes, cars, robots, smart devices, digital cameras, satellite dishes, even super-yachts. Mechatronics engineers are the ones who integrate these machines with computers. You'll find these degrees open up a wide range of career possibilities you might never have thought of before. Such as using our can-do attitude and QE ingenuity to develop world-class automation, robotics and vision systems, like we do here at CanDo Innovation. Or developing designs for large-scale manufacturing like we're doing here. And we went on to design the world's most advanced plasma cutting machines here in New Zealand. These are universal degrees that will allow you to work anywhere in industry, commerce or academia. For the past three years I was acconded to BMW in Germany for the i-project and in that I was working in the department responsible for the manufacturing of carbon fibre reinforced plastics which make the majority of the structure of this car. Mechatronics is a blend of mechanical, electronic and computer systems engineering. This involves designing and controlling things like surgical robots, wearable exhaust skeletons and self-driving cars, as well as automating large-scale industrial machinery, systems and production processes. Our programs are led by a team of passionate and research active academics. Each year we welcome around 200 undergraduate students starting their specializations in mechanical engineering and mechatronics engineering. Our labs house some of the latest engineering technology such as laser scanners, 3D printers, medical robots, computer controlled manufacturing systems. And here motion capture for unmanned aerial vehicles. Plus there's our twisted flow wind tunnel and our new closed-circuit wind tunnel, which is the largest in New Zealand. These wind tunnels can be used for building, sail and vehicle aerodynamics, wind energy and elite cyclist studies. You'll have opportunities to participate in a wide range of activities outside the lecture room. One example is the Formula SAE team who design, build and race a new car each year. Last year they came third in the Australasian competition. We offer two world-class internationally respected programs that will give you a firm foundation for your future career and will give you the opportunity to tailor your final year to match your own interests and career objectives. The opportunities are endless. Don't miss out. Achieve the amazing.


Hi everyone, Sean with jaspyscasebreaks.com here doing 2021 Bowman Baseball HTA Jumbo 8 box case break pick your team number eight where all cards ship eight boxes 12 packs 32 cards and three autos per box. So 24 autos in the case. Here is our list of customers respective teams from Daniel Ausley and the Diamondbacks down to Ryan Dupuy in the Nationals Daniel Ausley with last spot module in the A's as well. There's that list and here's our case first part of this video just going to be me stacking up all the cards so I'm going to rip open all the boxes so what I would do is if you want to watch the break and you're watching this on replay fast forward to the about 20 25 minute mark for the action if you just want to see the good stuff the autos and any hits numbered out of 100 or less just go to the description and for the video you're watching you should see a little timestamp that says recap if you click on that it should take you directly to the recap at the end of the break if for some reason timestamps not working then just fast forward to whatever the timestamp says and that'll give you all the goodness our eight boxes there we go so every stack and jumbo is going to be or there's going to be two stacks for every box in jumbo just because it takes up the stacks are too high if it's just one okay let's see if we can get a super here and last box to rip every two stacks is one nick madrigal for the white socks tallot pipeline for the Mets and alex kirloff for the twins jason demingas for the Yankees louis robert for the white socks and nolyn jones for the indians kibriane haze for the pirates and dylan carlson 19 out of 100 atomic rookie auto for the cardinals michael brinston congrats michael very nice zack vane for the rockies and alexander remirez refractor bowman first to 499 for the angels joe christensen maximo acosta for the rangers daniel ousley riley green for the tigers and erin judge for the yankees d.l hall for the orioles erin sabato for the twins eric jock nice auto to start the case uh tampa bay rays talent pipeline austin hendrick for the reds blaze jordan for the red socks matthew shearer is it one per case on the rookie autos i didn't realize that spencer torkelson for the tigers asa lacy for the royals and brett baddie for the mets and nick insala's atomic for the pirates eric jock did not really realize that okay kasey mys for the tigers and riley thompson bowman first auto for the cubs russell thompson brison stop for the fillies kevin all kintara chrome for the yankees leo core kevin all kintara paper for the yankees emerson handcock for the mariners alec bomb for the fillies and logan gilbert for the mariners talent pipeline for the braves and paul gulchman purple paper to 250 for the cardinals michael brinson marco luciano for the giants is male mania to 125 for the padres charles wolfkill austin hendrick for the reds jason domingas for the yankees and louis patino for the padres christian javier for the astros and andre samenez rookie auto as well for the mets daniel ousley rois louis for the twins austin martin for the blue jays matthew shearer bobby miller to 250 for the dodgers leo core zak mean for the rockies christian pache for the braves and louis robert for the white socks erin sabato chrome for the twins eric jock and elliot ramos atomic for the giants rashid grant two good ones too joe adel for the angels and yolki sespedis white socks jason sebert one of the last teams available and it's a refractor auto for you there you go dude francisco alvarez for the bets bradon shoemaker that's a big one blaze jordan for the red socks not just a yolkly sespedis refractor of 499 zak mean for the rockies six doh sanchez for the marlins and ian aderson for the braves that was the last that was the last expensive team available it was between that going tonight and going tomorrow yeah a costa now now we need a maximum of costa that was a very nice auto talent pipeline for the dodgers a salacy for the royals and freudas nova out of 75 for the astros that is mark castanzo a salacy for the royals christian robinson for the dime backs and drew waters for the braves evan white for the mariners and alexander remeer is bowman first auto for the angels joe christianson hey susan for the athletics erin sabato chrome for the twins eric jock and austin martin chrome for the blue jays matthew shearer erin sabato for the twins anthony volpe at 299 for the yankees leo core max mayer for the marlins heston curse stud for the royals and gaven lux for the dodgers grace and rodriguez atomic for the orioles mark beset dude that was all you congrats christian javier for the astros talent pipeline for the cubs and brady singer for the royals austin martin blue paper to 150 blue jays matthew shearer very nice spent your torquelson for the tigers rois louis for the twins and jazz chism for the marlins yeah literally only bowman first autos dillian carlson for the cardinals and mic abel bowman first auto for the fillies eric jock sam huff for the rangers nick lofton the 125 for the royals leo core emerson handcock for the mariners joe dell for the angels and gerardo prodomo for the dime it backs uh i don't know i don't think matt's in the chat steve just the head talent pipeline for the giants micabell for the fillies austin hendrick for the reds andrew von for the white sox and ryan mountcastle for the orioles and tyler callahan atomic for the reds russell thompson maximoa costa for the rangers daniel ousley yeah sorry buddy i don't actually know when the last time i saw him in the chat was so that's the first two boxes um i'm not going to say it because i don't want to jinx it christian javier and yohan rojas 30 out of 50 gold shimmer auto bowman first fillies eric jock blaze jordan for the red sox just saying i think we got the right case max mayer for the marlins would be rodriguez for the mariners and andres jimenez for the meds yeah i just think we got a really good case talent pipeline for the brewers charlie blackman the 299 for the rockies anthony lou corbin carol for the diamondbacks kevin allkentara chrome for the yankees leo core and gabriel arias atomic or sorry not atomic sparkle the 299 for the indians eric ainge blaze jordan for the red sox max mayers for the marlins and hunter green for the reds maximoa costa chrome for the rangers daniel ousley blaze jordan chrome for the red sox matthew shearer dylan carlson for the cardinals and hyun il choy bowman first auto for the dodgers leo cure jeter down for the red sox hunter bishop the 299 for the giants oh that uh bottom corner there is totally yeah rashid grant that sucks heston curse dad for the orioles adley rushman for the orioles and sean murphy for the athletics anthony volpe atomic for the yankees leo core kid ryan haze for the pirates talent pipeline for the giants and christian pache for the braves austin hendrick for the reds heston curse dad for the orioles and dispenser torkelson for the tigers erin sabato chrome for the twins eric jock austin martin chrome for the blue jays matthew shearer kasey meyes for the tigers and jose rodriguez bowman first auto for the white sox jason sebert again nick madrigal for the white sox as well logan gilbert 299 for the mariners leo core kevin all kintara for the yankees zack vane for the royals rockies mike trowell for the angels and josh young for the rangers talent pipeline for the dodgers o'neill cruise uh for the pirates right max moocosta for the rangers asa lacy for the royals zack vane for the rockies and shaling liars for the braves and ronnie maricio atomic for the ments daniel ousley evan white for the mariners and blaze jordan bowman first red sox matthew shearer hey sue sanchez for the marlins heston curse dad for the orioles asa lacy for the royals and debbie garcia for the yankees max moocosta chrome again for the rangers daniel ousley max moocosta paper for the rangers i know dan i know talent pipeline red sox kasey myse tigers blaze jordan chrome red sox matthew shearer logan davidson the 199 for the a's daniel ousley last spot mojo blaze jordan for the red sox mick abel for the fillies michael toglia for the rockies and joy bark for the giants kevin all kintar for the yankees the bomb for the fillies and jefferson espagnol bowman first refractor auto for the diamondbacks and daniel ousley riley green for the tigers matt manning the 399 for the tigers eric jock francisco alvarez for the ments mckenzie gore for the padres and kibri and haze for the pirates austin wells atomic for the yankees leo core dylan carlson for the cardinals talent pipeline for the pirates and nolyn gorman for the cardinals austin martin chrome for the blue jays matthew shearer jason rosario to 299 for the red sox matthew shearer a salacy for the royals bobby witt jr for the royals and jordan blazovic for the twins and heston cursedad gold chrome orioles mark beset that's not true rex i'm i'm just like every other man that cries that's a lie rex that's a lie joe dell for the angels and g kwan bay bowman first blue to 150 for the pirates eric jock robert hassel for the padres rex housework max mire for the marlins tatis for the padres and eliot ramos for the giants dmitry how are you buddy you were that close on the helmet that close ended up you ended up number two well i mean that'd be cool i know dude i know this is like i was like oh oh how are you buddy uh talent pipeline for the twins daniel lynch for the royals had to go in and do an order and a few other things so monday's your night's off blaze jordan for the red sox jj bladay for the marlins jason domingas for the yankees and hunter bishop atomic for the giants rashid grant erin sabato for the twins rookie of the year six dough sanchez for the marl there we go daniel i knew we had something here i knew we had something going here here maximoa costa purple refractor to 250 but all brujan for the rays we just passed the halfway point marco luciano for the giants wander franco for the rays and nick gonzalez for the pirates kevin all kintara chrome for the yankees leo core she's so pretty sharp looking card man yeah all right we did it talent pipeline for the yankees max scherzer to 399 for the nationals ryan depuy and matmaning for the tigers jose solace to 499 for the marlins ryan depuy erin sabato for the twins cj abrams for the padres francisco alvarez for the medicine jared kelinick for the mariners i'm supposed to be on vacation next week i actually forgot i was approved but decided to hold off a week because three others are on vacation so what are you gonna do are you gonna take the vacation still or are you gonna are you gonna go in just cancel the vacation ryan mount castle for the orioles and nick matan bowman first for the fillies eric jock this is a solid case the kenzie core for the padres spencer torkelson to 499 going to the tigers eric jock corbin carol for the diamond backs wan soto for the nationals and julio rodriguez for the mariners matmaning atomic for the tigers eric jock kevinall kintaro for the yankees okay that's very uh very responsible of you rex very responsibles joey bart for the giants talent pipeline for the marlins and matthew libertore for the cardinals nick genzala for the pirates codie bellender for the dodgers and josey grave for the dodgers nate piercing for the blue jays and jared kelly bowman first auto for the white socks jason sebert brennan davis for the cubs and elliot ramos to 250 for the giants rashid grant austin martin for the blue jays i don't know why that song just popped in my head bobby wood jr for the royals nate piercing for the blue jays and edward cabrera for the marlins beat those sneezes right well yeah when you're doing it on your own you feel good about it rex but when somebody else is telling you to do it you're like no oh that's cool talent pipeline for the mariners and joey bart gold rookie one out of 50 for the giants rashid grant taylor trammel for the mariners read debtomers for the angels brett baddie for the mets and nick ladolo for the reds hunter green atomic for the reds uh russetompson no those are my sneezes just making my heart stronger by holding in all those sneezes that'd be a really weird fart ryan mount castle for the orioles talent pipeline for the orioles and zavier edwards for the rays erin sabato for the twins oh you got the first yama the night read debtomers for the angels joey bart for the giants and trevor larnac for the twins it's too much excitement with this box to be tired in this case andre semenez for the mets and max meyer auto for the marlins ryan depuy bobby wit jr for the royals andrew rohmo to 199 for the rockies anthony lou marco luciano for the giants ronda kuna jr for the braves and andrew von for the white socks talent pipeline for the cardinals brendan davis for the cubs that is numbered out of 125 russetompson and hested curse dad for the orioles kevin allkentara for the yankees cj abram for the padres riley green for the tigers and kebert ruiz for the dodgers emerson handcock atomic for the mariners leo cork austin martin for the blue jays louis garcia for the nationals and alexander vargas bowman first refractor auto get a little what's that little look in the middle that's kind of interesting uh for the yankees leo cork reed debtmurse for the angels corbin carol for the diamondbacks kasey mias for the tigers and dalton varshow for the diamondbacks talent pipeline for the astros joey vato to 499 for the reds russetompson alec thomas for the diamondbacks and kade cavalli sparkle to 299 for the nationals ryan depuy robert hasel for the padres heston curse dad for the orioles and ronnie maricio for the mets that's kind of cool that's the first auto of his i've pulled obviously or i feel like i would have remembered that it's like a little smiley face uh prestin press prestin williams for the dolphins wide receiver he does that too he has prestin williams jake chronan worth for the padres and robert hasel padres charles wolfkill a nice auto there wander franco for the rays francisco alvarez to 499 for the mets daniel ousley garret mitchell for the brewers spencher torkerson for the tigers and austin martin for the blue jays justin foscway atomic for the rangers daniel ousley so that was boxes six and no five and six that's cool that's cool right yeah these guys were battling for it it took the last second to last pack in the last box in the case nice we got two boxes left for us guys two to find our super does anybody remember that terrible song from the early 2000s superman that was just like super repetitive and super catchy and like just very popular on the radio not for serving that name that song is in my head nate piercin for the blue jays talent pipeline for the cardinals and ace lacy for the royals cj abrams for the padres spencher torkerson for the tigers and drew waters for the braves is that who was rex six dough sanchez for the marlins and g kwan bay refractor bowman first auto to 499 for the pirates eric jock hasus lasardo for the athletics and anthony volpe yellow to 75 for the yankees leo core corbin carol for the louis robert for the white sox and gavin luxe for the dodgers and sabato for the twins yeah for sure i'm gonna try to look that up on the way home tonight i think i remember that talent pipeline for the astros trevor larnac to 125 for the twins eric jock aj puck for the athletics austin martin for the blue jays robert hassel for the padres aviar edwards for the rays and hunter bishop for the giants heston cursed anatomic for the orioles mark beset very nice ryan mount castle and we got a redemption could it be could it be ryan mount castle orioles jordan groeschens for the blue jays garret michael for the brewers erin judge for the yankees clark schmidt for the yankees kevin al kintara for the yankees chrome prospect autograph garret michael milwaukee brewers how does garret michael i've pulled live autos of garret michael how does he have uh redemptions that's surprising leo core brewers oh i was hoping for austin martin i like garret michael but i've literally pulled live autos of his in this product already this year maybe he just didn't do all of them talent pipeline for the mezz and shohio tani to 499 for the angels joe christensen garret crochet for the white socks trevor larnac to 199 for the twins eric jock jason dominos for the yankees nikola dolo for the reds and max mayer for the marlins kevin al kintara chrome for the yankees leo core you finally tried it rex i told you it's good rex do you guys have raising canes where you're at as well if so do you like chick filet sauce better or raising cane sauce andris menos for the mezz and nick gonzalez pirate's auto eric jock alec bomb for the fillies and yellow corbin carol to 75 for the dinebacks daniel ousley the polynesians really good i like their their um yeah the saracha whatever their their other one is riley green for the tigers alec bomb for the fillies and six to sanchez for the marlins ivan johnson's atomic for the red russell tomson he changed his auto his auto and bowman draft was not this i don't think he changed his auto jake cronenworth for the padres and daniel montano for the rockies anthony lou bowman first auto bruce r graderall for the dodgers riley green for the tigers joe adel for the angels and chain baz for the rays austin martin for the blue jays roasted barbecue i get to believe at chic filet roasted barbecue in packets interesting a talent pipeline for the cubs louise garcita 499 for the nationals ryan depuy and louise campasano for the padres jason demingas blue to 150 yankees leo core nice one that's solid spencer torcos one for the tigers adley rushman for the orioles and tarq scuba for the tigers let's check that out nick madrigal for the white socks and beck way bowman first refractor auto for the yankees leo core spencer howard for the fillies there's a lot of chrome cards on passing mike yeah you mean a refractor erin sabato for the twins kevin all kintara blue paper to 150 for the yankees leo core like emerson handcock for the mariners six dosanches for the marlins and dylan carlsson for the cardinals bobby wood jr atomic for the royals leo core all card shit mike all card ship andres amenas for the mets talent pipeline for the tigers and forest witley for the astros maximo accosta for the rangers robert hassel for the padres dylan carlsson for the cardinals and grace and radriguez for the orioles plays jordan for the red socks i think they're starting him in single a soon rex so i think he's still 20 23 24 yeah i don't know 20 23 if they want to push it but 2024 realistically right louise garcia for the nationals and jake vogel bowman first sparkle auto for the dodgers leo core christian robinson for the diamond backs you near severino to 125 for the twins eric jock garret mitral for the brewers royce louis for the twins and evan white for the mariners yeah that's why i was saying 2023 would be if they want to push it really but i think realistically 2024 yeah i think he just recently turned 18 talent pipeline for the cardinals braylon marquez for the cubs jason da bingas for the yankees wander franco for the rays and tristan casas for the red socks atomic freddy zamora for the brewers leo core and that finishes it very nice that was now that it's done i can say that was an exceptionally great case exceptionally great case and you guys will all see right now what we're talking about uh here is our debut by the end of the year maybe yeah so this is our non-auto recap for disnova out of 75 austin martin paper out of 150 logan gilbert out of 99 has cursed that out of 50 joey barred out of 50 anthony volpe out of 75 corbin carol paper out of 75 jason da bingas out of 150 kevin all kentara paper out of 150 and bobby witt jr atomic autos dylan carlson atomic auto out of 100 riley thompson for the cubs andre cement as rookie for the mets yohakuy sespatus refractor auto out of 499 alexander ramirez for the angels micka bell for the fillies yohan rojas out of 50 for the fillies hyun il choy for the dodgers jose rodriguez for the white socks blaze jordan for the red socks jefferson espagnol for the uh to 499 for the diamondbacks jihuan bay to 150 for the pirates and maxima costa out of 250 for the rangers nick matam for the fillies jared kelly for the white socks max mire for the marlins alexander vargas to 499 for the yankees robert hassel for the podre's jihuan bay to 499 for the pirates garret michael chrome prospect autograph redemption for the brewers nick kenzala for the pirates daniel montano for the rockies beckway to 499 for the yankees and jake vogel to 299 sparkle for the dodgers hell of a case very nice stuff and there you go that was 2021 bowman baseball hd a jumbo eight box case break picatin number eight from jasper's case breaks dot com i'm shon jasper's case breaks dot com thanks for hanging out we'll see you next time