Good morning guys. Happy Saturday. We made it to Saturday. I don't know, last week was, it went by like medium pace. You know what I mean?  Well, half because I think it's like fun to like lay out the day, kind of like get it in my mind what we're doing and share it with you guys. And number two, so I actually like forced myself to do it because I don't wanna do anything today but we are going to make it a good day and just like a casual day. And I feel like you guys really like vlogs like that. Like I like vlogs like that. Anytime someone like a vlogger goes someplace, I don't know, I just find there more casual videos to be a lot more entertaining to me. And especially in the background, like when I'm working or just like folding laundry, like I like more casual vlogs like this. Hair still looks good. I know that like the topic changed pretty fast. I wanted to share a purchase that I got and I've been waiting for this for quite a while. It's on me right now. It is the Saranoni Blanket. It is like a gray cream color. It's reversible, so I'll show you guys. It's white on the side with like these little crosses on it or X's. I just like the pattern and it was kind of pricey. I love it. Don't regret buying it whatsoever. It's so fuzzy and warm.  I contact FedEx and I was like, hey, like where's my package? It says it's delivered. It's not here. And FedEx has lost another package before. It was my Gymshark stuff. So I contact them and they're like, oh, sorry. Like it says it was delivered this time, this day. So basically contact the provider that like sent it out. So then I message and email Saranoni. They were really nice. Apparently they have like buyer protection or like insurance in case that happens. So they're like, oh, you have to like reach out to this company. And I'm like, okay. So I reached out to that company and they were like, okay, our policy is you have to wait like five days before you like go further with your claim. And I was like, oh, okay. So I was like, maybe it'll just come a little late. And it did. So I'm happy. They got the blanket. So the plan for today, I'm gonna work out because typically sometimes I go to cycle bar on Saturday but like I didn't today because like I said in my other video, I'm trying to like not go out as much because we're working from home and like gas prices. So I'm just gonna work out here today. Then we are gonna shower, wash the hair and I'm gonna curl it because I think it'll look so pretty. Like all the curls are gone from my hair now because as you guys know, curls don't like to stay in my hair. So I'm gonna wash it, curl it.  Valerie's giving me side eye right now. Yeah, Valerie's cooking, that's part of the plan too. But you know how they're always out of like stuff, white rice, chicken, sauces, like my parents like always don't get what they want either. Well, it was Lunar New Year and I was like, we should have Chinese because it's like Lunar New Year and Chinese New Year, whatever, Year of the Tiger. I don't know, because we never know what to eat. So I kind of like go off of the theme of like what's going on. So I'm like, okay, let's try Chinese. Panda doesn't have like what we want. Then let's go to Payway. So we ended up having Payway that night because they didn't have the chicken. They were like, we have it, but it's only served on the weekends. And I was like, I'm going on Saturday to see if it's true or if they were just like bullshitting us, you know what I mean? So that is gonna be a project that we're gonna do today as well. Then I'm gonna come home. I have some laundry to fold. I got it all done yesterday, but I didn't get to fold the towels. So I'm gonna do that. After lunch, I'm trying to like build this in my mind and it's already like 1040. So this is gonna be like a lot of stuff. A lot of stuff to get done before like one-ish because like I don't wanna eat too late because my mom's cooking. And that's another part of the video. So that's the game plan for today.  And I don't know, I just don't have a lot of ideas. Like sometimes I do. They're not gonna be as long as the vlogs. Obviously because like I just can't talk that much. You know what I mean? Like I'm one of those people that's like really get to the point sort of people when I talk, but I love listening to people's like stories and stuff. So I personally like long vlogs as well. So I'm trying to work on like my chitter chatter banter. Hope you guys enjoy it too. I've gotten a couple comments now saying that they like it and I'm like, yay, I'm so happy. So I'm glad I'm doing something right even though partially the views don't reflect it because I'm not, I'm really trying to like not clickbait because I don't know, I feel like I'm really good at it. And when I do clickbait, like I do get a lot of views but like I just feel kind of bad. So please just click on my video because you'll like it. Thanks. I'm gonna finish watching this video. I'm watching like Emily Enchanted's like day in my life video. She lives a much more exciting Orlando life than I do, but it's fine. I'm gonna finish watching that and then I'm gonna exercise. Okay, so I just got done with my workout. I didn't film like all four videos that I did because it would just be like really long even though we're trying to make the time longer. But anyway, I just didn't film all of it. But I'll show you guys, I did the Wednesday sweaty smile. When I work at home, I like to do abs and arms. I didn't do arms today, but I did the sweat because I only went to cycle bar like three times this week I did 10 minutes abs and fat burn. I didn't do the stretch because I just like stretched on my own. And then I did the 12 minute happy sweat and the HIIT workout. The HIIT workout, the orange photo there is like my favorite one. It's like super challenging. And my stamina has actually gotten a lot better because like I can get through that one without like having to stop, which is great. And then I did the 10 minute standing abs and HIIT. I didn't do the warmup. So the one here like I didn't do but the one that she's wearing pink I did and that one is super hard when it's the last video you do after all of the three other ones. So I could barely get through that one. And yeah, now I'm going to go to Panda and let's see if they have stuff to eat. I was going to go after I showered but I want to eat kind of earlier. And it's like 12, 14. It's not going to actually be that much earlier than when I would normally eat but I want to eat, I want to try to eat earlier like 12, 30 ish, 12, 45 because I normally eat later. But I want to be hungry when Valerie cooks. So that's why I just want to eat a little bit earlier in Panda if they actually do have their stuff in on the weekend is a little bit more filling. I'm going to do that. Let's see if they have the chicken. I haven't had this chicken in probably over, over four months. Yeah, it's been a while. Well, this is certainly a look, you know? These shoes are way too big. I only really wear them to cycle bar. I don't really wear them anywhere else but hopefully I won't have to get out of the car because this is really weird. You know what? I'm going to get the jacket. Well, no, I'm all sweaty. I want dirty, I just cleaned it. So nevermind. You know what? We are just going to go out of the house looking like this. It's at the leisure wear, right? All right, let's go. Let's see if they have the stuff. Change of plans because it is like 60 degrees out. So I go out here and I'm like, oh my gosh, it is kind of cold. So I put on this sweater thing because it's already kind of dirty. Like I wore it to cycle bar and stuff. So I was like, you know what? I need to wear something because it's just too cold. This is a better look that I'm going with. And I love this bag. You don't get me wrong. Oh, so cold. But it's just so big, even though I love it.  So let's go. Yeah, would you happen to have the grilled teriyaki chicken? That's so funny because someone recently told us that they had that, but it's only on the weekends. Oh, okay. Well, thank you. Have a good day. Oh my gosh. So a re-surprise, no. That is so freaking funny. Oh my gosh, they don't have it. Like I'm gonna call my mom real quick. Hopefully she can answer. She's like on a break or something. That is so funny. Oh my gosh. Well, I'm gonna go to Starbucks. Hey, baby. Sherry, guess what? Yeah, chicken. Yeah, she said it was on the weekends, but super, super random. And I was like, oh, okay. Like, I mean, it's not her fault, but I just thought it was so funny because like that's what they told you. Like not like on Tuesday, wait, wasn't it Tuesday? They said on the weekends, they didn't say occasionally on the weekend. Yeah. We have it on the weekend. Oh my gosh. But I'm kind of glad that I went to try because I was curious, you know? Yeah. So we get a half. I'm gonna go to Starbucks. Do you want anything? What are you getting at Starbucks? I'm gonna get just like my coffee and then some egg bites. Whoa, my camera just fell. Oh, it's still recording. That's so funny. So do you want anything? Actually, I would like egg bites if they have them. What kind? Can you just text me? Can you text them to me? Oh, the kind with bacon. The kind with bacon. Okay, I'll grab those for you then. Okay. All right, so heading to Starbucks and gonna do the mobile order. That is so funny. I just had to try. You know what I'm saying? I mean, it's not the workers fault or anything like that. So like, I'm not like mad. Like I would never be like, I want to speak to the manager. Well, we did actually ask to speak to the manager over like something else because like they were that bad. So, but like we're not like rude. We're just like, hey, like what's the issue? You know, so just thought that was super funny. Oh, not like made my day. Oh my gosh. All right, I hope you guys enjoyed some of that. I'm gonna get my lunch now and then we'll be on our way. Oh man, today's just a good day. I'm always craving Starbucks now because I think it's like an addiction. It's one of those things that's like a luxury. Like there's a few luxury things that I do pay for. Nails now, hair, I just like got done. And Starbucks is a luxury. Like it's way overpriced. When I was at Duncan and I looked at the prices, they weren't that different than Starbucks. It was only like a dollar difference, but the product Starbucks offers is just so much better. And Duncan stuff is like, yeah, you get more product, I feel like, but it's just so like, it's just not that good. It's way too sweet and just, just not it. We have secured the goods. Got my usual order, my vanilla sweet cream cold brew with caramel drizzle, so good. It's just like the balance. It's like that perfect balance of a beverage. I don't know, I feel like lattes were a little bit too milk heavy, so I don't know, I'm just like obsessed with this right now. And then I got to share some bacon egg bites and then I got my kale egg bites. Hopefully they gave us two forks. Well, I'm going home anyway, so it doesn't really matter. We are running on time, not like there's any real schedule and like timing, but guys, like I accomplished what I wanted to because like, when I want something, like I want the specific item I want. Like I'm willing to wait for the exact product I want because if I'm going to be like putting my money towards something, like it has to be what I want. I think the biggest reason and like lesson I learned when I was young was that like, if I wanted something I had to really, really want it because my parents would like get me clothes and like, I don't know, toys and stuff. And I was really grateful and stuff, but I would never use it at all. And then I would like want to give it away to like one of my friends and they would be like really mad. So when I started buying things, like, well, we first like learned, okay, you have to like really, really want the item and then, you know, we'll get it for you. And then my mom would always be like, are you going to wear this? Because she wouldn't want to obviously like spend any money on stuff that I like wouldn't wear and stuff. So that's kind of like a backstory as to like, you know, me waiting for things. So for example, I really wanted this like Louis Vuitton mini backpack. It's the mini Palm Springs. Like I used it, well, I use it constantly and I still like love to use it. So I knew that bag was like hard to get. So I just kept checking the website and eventually it popped up. And that's kind of like what I've learned. Try the item on like see it in person. And if they don't have it or the color you want, then just wait and then like keep checking like on the website for things. So as you guys know, like I've been wanting this defined jacket. I want the one without the hood and I want the white one because like I love the way it looks. And I know white is probably not the smartest color to choose, but it's just so, you know, it reminds me of, it reminds me of the storm troopers at Disney, like the Star Wars ones. So I don't know, I just really like it and I wanted that one. So they're always so well, especially my size. So I wear size eight, it fits me perfectly. So I've been stocking the website. They said that they get orders in Tuesdays and Fridays. So I just kept checking the website. I checked it yesterday and they had the black one but I just got a black defined jacket. And I think that that wouldn't be like very smart to get like the same color just like without the hood. And I like the one I just got. So I'm not gonna part with it. After I got out of the shower, as you can tell, Lululemon sent this like promo email. I always get the promotions and it's really annoying with different companies. I always have to like delete them. But I got this and I'm like, you know what? I'm gonna just check the website again because you know, you should always just check the website. So I checked the website. I had it like bookmarked in my favorites folder and I was looking at the sizes. Click on the white one. Make sure that the size says eight and it was available. So I just immediately like, I just picked it up. I just clicked Apple Pay and bam. So I got the white one.  Time because like I've had enough. I've gotten pieces that I wanted and I have plenty of fitness wear so I don't need anything else. And yeah, so now I'm gonna dry my hair. I'm just so happy.  I don't know why. Half the time I don't know like the words to songs. So yeah. Anyway, I'm gonna get to drying my hair. Okay, so I got my hair all dry and rushed out. It looks so much better guys. Like it looks a lot healthier than it once did. It's just nice. Now I'm going to curl it because I wanna see what it looks like when I curl it my way, if that makes sense. So I'm gonna put it in my high ponytail and curl it. My hairstylist Jasmine did the beachy waves, which I love. I do not think they're too geeky or old but I definitely, I can't produce curls that look like that because I don't have like the right curling iron. We have these like a long face framing pieces that I'm kind of living for right now. I love them. They're kind of like, they're like not curtain bangs because they're too long for that but it still like gives it more dimension, you know? Okay, so I got my hair all curled and we're gonna take it out now. This camera battery is flashing so I'm gonna quickly replace it. I only burn myself once. This finger, I don't know why but now we are going to take this out. Hopefully I curled it like the right directions because the last time like my other, like this side was curled in, it was like wrong. So hopefully it's not like that anymore. So let's see. I don't think, I think it's correct. Yeah. Oh, it's correct. I am so thrilled. Look how big and curly and voluminous there is. No guys, I love curling my hair like this because it looks like the Dyson Air app. And I know I cannot just get over how good my hair looks when I do it that way. So that's good to know. My hair is kind of like weird up here. I think that's because of having it in the ponytail. I have no idea. Like it normally doesn't. Maybe it'll calm down a little bit. Maybe if I like try to brush it. I don't know. It's kind of weird up there. Maybe I'll just like try to straighten it like by doing this. It'll flatten out in a little bit anyway. So it's cute. And now I'm gonna go probably take an Instagram boomerang or something cause I don't know.  It does look shorter now because of the curls. When it's straighter, it's a little longer as you guys saw. But I did want her to cut all of that like the ed blonde stuff off because that was hair probably from when I like bleached my hair. And if you guys have been around my channel then you would know like when my hair was like super, super blonde. And this is the outfit for today. This is what we're rocking. I have these pants from Fabletics. They sent these to me and I am so happy with them. Like they're good for pajamas. They're good for like lounge days like today. And then I'm wearing my Lululemon Align tank. I just thought it went well and it's not that cold anymore. So the hoodie wasn't as like necessary to wear. So just want to show the outfit. Oh, also another thing too. When we went to go get Chili's that night I got a little spot on these pants. And I was so concerned. We think it's just water cause everything came out of the pants. But that was like great. I just got these. Luckily I took the picture for Instagram but I'm like, I already like messed them up. So it's kind of funny. Okay. So before I do the laundry I'm like, I want to film a TikTok cause my hair looks good and that's what we're doing. So I'm learning to dance. I think I almost kind of have it but this one is like kind of hard. It's the one that's like build a house and then call the house, call thing like really gets me. All right. I think we got the TikTok. Oh my gosh guys. I am just sweating mildly. TikToks always make me sweat. I think it's half the time because I'm nervous. And then the other times I don't know you're like moving your body. So I was like, please I don't want to get sweaty. I don't want to get too sweaty because like I just curled my hair and like washed it. So I think we're okay. I'm just going to like try to cool down because I don't lose the curls. So just going to throw some laundry in and kind of just like chill out. I don't know what the rest of the day is bringing but I'm going to get the laundry in now. Laundry is coming along, got it all folded. Just need to put it away. Sherry, don't break. I am on break, I've got like seven more minutes. Woo-hoo. Are you excited for dinner? I'm starving. I hope Valerie starts soon. I've just been doing a lot of chores, that's all. And my hair still has curl, which I'm kind of surprised about. We'll probably be even more faint tomorrow, but it's okay. Gonna put these away now. Valerie hasn't been in the video yet. She is prepping. Hello, hello, how are you all out there in TV land? So we have the mushrooms. These are the filets. I think that's his fear of the cellar there. Yes. Where is he asparagus? Oh, there's an onion. He has hisparagus over by the oven. Here they are. Just thought I would update you guys. Valerie, we're going to have to do another cooking video. We will. And then we're having chicken tomorrow night. I can't wait for that. It's going to be nice. I just love chicken made. Yes, so good. And Valerie, tell them my great idea for the sauce because you guys know, I love Valerie's Worcestershire sauce, but she puts on my special sauce, the filets. Well, I started thinking about and started reading some things that, you know, what really good idea to use the leftover sauce, you know, especially, you know, when you've got a contaminated with animal blood and stuff, cool. So anyway, it's a cross-contamination issue that you should like really put that on your meat after you bring it in. Which makes sense. Yeah. But then we didn't have the sauce. I was just putting a little piece of butter on it to keep things moist. But Alice said, I love the sauce. And so last week for the first time, she gave me the suggestion of holding some of the sauce back so I could then put it on the filet or the chicken or whatever I'm fixing with that sauce. Yeah. When I bring it in, I thought that was an extraordinarily good idea. We did that last week and it worked out well. I've already got the sauce back there waiting. Yay. So that was a very good idea. She is one smart cookie. Thanks. So I wanted to film the filet. Look how juicy and yummy this looks. I will film the other stuff like once it comes off, but this just got off. So I'm just gonna start eating now. Valerie's gotten done with dinner and everything tastes and looks fabulous. Thank you. It is.


Γεια σας, είναι Vicky εδώ και σήμερα είμαι σήμερα με Creative Aid. Σήμερα εμείς θα παίρνουμε ένα κομμάτι για όλες τα τελευταία πράγματα από τα τελευταία μου για τον Ιούν. Ας ξεκινήσουμε με τα 4x8 τελευταία. Λοιπόν, θα σας first σημαίνω μία τελευταία μου από την κομμάτι. Αυτό είναι ένα κομμάτι like a pirate. Έχει με τρεις αδωρετικές πειρές. Υπάρχει ένα νάιλαντ, υπάρχουν τραζοχές, ένα παρόδο, ένα πόδο και dynasty. Λόγων και γνώτες πριν μαχής από το πειρές οσφαλία. Νομίζω ότι αυτό είναι μία εξαιρμιά να πούμε για τελευταία μονο μάτια. Εδώ βλέπει ένα άλλο από τα τελευταία. Αυτό είναι ένα πολύ μεγάλο αδυνήμαegt αυτό με τον άτορτο το αδωρετικό μήν. Υπάρχει μία μάρτια, ένα λίγο πρόπσο, λίγο τρίδες και όλα για να φύγεις your own little sin και έναίδος έρχεται εξαιρμό με τ Kaen που μπορεί να γίνει κάθε νατροφή στους εργασίες, such as Let the Adventure Begin, I Love You, Bear Hugs, I Miss You, I'm Sorry, Be Brave and many more. Και αν εγώ αρέσει, ξέρω ότι θα αρέσει αυτό το σταμσέφτ. Είναι με 5 διαφορετικές εργασίες εργασίες για εσείς να κολλωθείς και είναι μεταξύ στις εργασίες, οι οποίοι είναι καλύτερος για εργασίες και ακόμα εργασίες. Έτσι, κάποιοι λέει ευχαριστώ για εργασίες. Ευχαριστώ για να κολλωθείς, καλύτερα για να κολλωθείς, καλύτερα για εγώ και many more. Και εδώ είναι ένα αδωραμό στις εργασίες εργασίες εργασίες. This is called Fairy Happy and as you can see it comes with those two adorable fairy little ladies. Έχει πολλές εργασίες για εσείς να κολλωθείς your little sins. The sentiments are great for birthday cards and friendship cards and I also love those swirls that you can stamp as if your fairies are flying away and there are also matching dice. Και τώρα, δούμε το 4 x 6 στις εργασίες από αυτή's release. There are actually three and let's start with this adorable one with the leopards these are called loveable leopards and certainly they are it comes with three different designs that are also three little birdies and sentiments such as I spot a great friend our friendship is always an adventure they are really really great for friendship cards and there are also matching dice. Και στις σάμερες όλοι είναι εδώ στις εργασίες και εσείς ξέρεις πώς αρέσει το αδωραμό και να κολλωθεί ένα λίγο αδωραμό στις εργασίες, εδώ είναι ένα αδωραμό στις εργασίες που είναι called ocean fun. I just love the solid design because you just stamp cut out and you are ready to go there are also matching dice and I love that they give you this big wave border and there are some fun sentiments in this set such as I'm so jelly but super happy for you that bites I love you deeply and many more. Και εδώ είναι το τελευταίο στις εργασίες της 4x6 από αυτή την εργασία, οπότε αυτό είναι called color drops and it comes with all those teardrop shapes and the circles that you can use for creating your backgrounds and I can really see a flower made out of this and there are also matching dice I'm going to bring them in later on and let's move on to the 4x3 στις εργασίες, αυτό είναι called you float my boat and as you can see it comes with two adorable little boats that you can also cut out with the matching dice and it also includes sentiments to match that notical theme such as you float my boat you are my anchor and ahoy and the little girl is back again this month for a stamp set perfect for get well cards so she is on her bed this time and there are sentiments such as get well soon and hope you're up and smiling soon and finally here's a teeny tiny 3x2 stamp set which is called interactive labels and this is perfect for all the interactive cards that you need to inform the recipient of how to do so there are words such as flip press look open slide spin pool along with tiny little arrows to complete the label and now let's take a quick look on all the dynamic dice that have been released for this month so these are stitched labels with fish tails on each end and I really love them I love everything that has stitching all around and this is the stitched star grid it comes with two different plates as you can see the one doesn't cut out but only adds that stitched line and the other one cuts out tons and tons of stars and here is a die that I'm in love with this is the ocean view porthole I really love it just because I love creating shaker cards and I think this is going to be a great way to create shaker cards that give you a view under order so there are also clouds and this time the clouds have stitching on the inside and on the outside you know I love clouds and I use them all the time for creating my little sky scene so I know I will be using this a lot and here are the color drops there are six different dies in one set you can combine them with the color drops stamp set and or you can use them on their own another very versatile die is this one it's called heart shaker window and frame it comes with the two designs the one cuts out a frame and the other one cuts out only the shape of the heart it it is really perfect for creating shaker cards so I'm going to put those aside and I'm going to show you some more dies that cut out words now in the package I received with the full release of for june I got this thanks die which is really awesome but I can't find it on the official website so just forget about that thanks word for now and let's talk a little bit about the happy greetings this comes with three words love hello and happy and words are really versatile you can use them again and again and for in so many different ways every month we also get a new stencil so this is the stencil for june it's called stencil framework and it gives you this beautiful geometric design for creating your backgrounds and finally we get the rubber stamp for this month which again gives you the same design as the stencil that's called the framework background it's exactly the same design as the stencil but just a little bit smaller I'm going to bring in the stencil so you can see the difference and since this is a background stamp it's quite big so you can cover up vertically or horizontally a standard four and a quarter by five and a half card and these were the products released by my favorite things for the month of june join me tomorrow where I will be putting most of these products into use creating eight cards and if you need more inspiration here are two more videos that I created a while back thank you all for watching and see you all tomorrow


And to have a series from a person having immense knowledge like just as Katie Sankaran who himself runs a YouTube channel by his own name. We requested him and as you usually say that the speaker was kind enough to accept our invite and before we were starting at a talk with Mr. SK Premraj Menon who is also from Kerala who said that he is one of the most erudite speakers coupled with his knowledge. But today in the morning we received one of the shocks that honourable Mr. Justice M. M. Shantanu Nagar, a judge of the Supreme Court of India, passed away. And therefore though in this particular part, part one, we have not mentioned as such but Justice Sankaran wanted that this particular series should be dedicated in his name because he has been the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court and I was just reading on various social medias. His immense knowledge coupled with his immense popularity being the Chairman of the Bar Council of Karnataka Vice Chairman, then Mediation and so on and on. Coupled with his judgments which have been widely received. So the only way which we thought that as to whether we should move on of today's session or how to go about it, keeping in view this news and the way these sessions are going on. We thought that the best reverence to a person could be given. If we dedicate this Limitation Act series to Justice M. M. Shantanu Nagar, a judge of Supreme Court of India. I would request Justice Sankaran to take over as such and share his knowledge on the Limitation Act. Yes. Thank you Mr. Vikas and thank you friends. Today is a sad day for me. Justice Sankaran Gowda, he was the Chief Justice of Kerala. We had together had a division bench sitting for quite some time and he was kind enough to all the judges and he believed me and another judge most being the senior most judges. And he was personally very cordial, very the warmth in his approach and very kind not only towards us, but towards other judicial officers, subordinate judiciary people. I am not giving the examples, particularly when the life of 31 ones in my states became fruitful. They are judicial officers now only because of the effort made by Justice Shantanu Nagar. Otherwise, they would have ceased to be judicial officers even after a training of two years at the academy. Instead of one year, we extended the training for two years because of some technical difficulty. We could not comply with the norms given by the Supreme Court and therefore there was some practical problem. And when I met him, met Shantaran Gowda and said that this is the problem. He did it, deputed a wayster for that purpose alone and he inaugurated more than 30 Gramani alias, made arrangements for inauguration of 30, more than 30 Gramani alias. And all those judicial officers were appointed and posted. And their life would have become miserable. Many of them would have committed suicide. Many of them told me that they are no longer judicial officers, no longer advocates, and their life will become so miserable. And the only person who did that successfully was Justice Shantaran Gowda. Likewise, there are several instances where he was so helpful and I got a report from the Supreme Court now today that even in the Supreme Court, he used his good offices to help so many people in the Karnataka judiciary and others. And he was like that. And therefore when I got the news, I was so sad. I continued to be so sad because of the friendship. I had gone to his house in Bangalore to invite for my son's wedding and he had visited my house. We had lunch together, dinner together. And very, very affectionate man. So, when I pointed out to this Mr. Vikas, he said that we need not postpone the Zoom meeting and instead we can dedicate this to the name of Justice Shantar Gowda. I agree. And accordingly it was done. Now, today there is some problem with my internet, I think an unknown error occurred. I am trying Zoom meeting in my laptop for several times. Yesterday I tried it was successful, but today it is not successful. And therefore I am using my mobile. Please bear with me. I do not know whether it is so clear and audible. But please bear with me. Yes, is it audible? Yes, it is audible. That is enough. Yes, now we are dealing with Limitation Act in a few episodes. Limitation Act, though small, it is very challenging and very, very to some extent difficult also. One might think that it is so easy, but it is not so. And in its application to some extent there may be difficulties. And so long as you are having civil cases in the subordinate courts, you must master the Limitation Act, otherwise there will be practical problems arising. And when you give advice also, see there is a likelihood of your side committing an error, which may lead to several complications. And therefore please bear with, please bear in mind that such errors should not occur. In the practical life, these tips you must be able to remember and it should not forget. And the scheme of the Limitation Act is it contains sections and articles. Just CPC sections and orders and rules. Here it is sections and articles. There are 31 sections and 137 articles. Now let us see, I think you are having the barrack of CPC with you. If not, next time onwards, please bring a barrack, small one. This is enough for our study because otherwise it is difficult. So my request is that you have a barrack with you, just this one. This is enough. There are 31 sections I said and there are 137 articles. How these articles are arranged? And these articles occur in the schedule. After the sections, there is a schedule. In the schedule, the first division is suits. First, there are, before going to the articles, I have to mention to you that the Limitation Act deals with suits, appeals and applications. Sir, you are not audible. So there was something, right now it is okay sir. You are not audible. I think there is a problem of the net. There is a low bandwidth. Your voice is high. Because on the hard screen, it is reflecting low bandwidth. Oh, what to do. Interruption is there. I see. Laptop again. It is not. Now it is better. Yes, sir. So that is why I was... Yes, sir. Fine. That is why I keep my camera close so that they say the bandwidth occupies more space if you watch the videos. Yes. Now in the scheduled period of limitation, periods of limitation and first division, etc. First division relates to suits and the different parts, one, two, like that. Different types of suits are mentioned. 10 types of suits are, please note, one, suits relating to accounts. That is articles 1 to 5. Suits relating to contracts. Articles 6 to 55. Suits relating to declarations. Articles 56 to 58. Suits relating to decrease in instruments. Articles 59 and 60. Then 5 suits relating to immobile property. Articles 61 to 67. Suits relating to immobile property. Suits relating to mobile property. Articles 68 to 71. Then suits relating to tort. Articles 72 to 91. Then suits relating to trusts and trust property. Articles 92 to 96. Next, suits relating to miscellaneous matters. Articles 97 to 112. And suits for which there is no prescribed period. That is a residual article. Article 113. This is the manner in which the limitation act to the scheduled division one is arranged. So these are the different 10 different types of suits. And different periods of limitation. And then second division relate to appeals. And it is article 114 to 117. 114 to 117. And the third division relates to applications. That is 118 to 137. We have seen article 113. It is a residual article I said in suit which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in the schedule. The period of limitation is three years. And likewise so far as applications are concerned. There is a residual article that is article 137. Which provides that. This is the word in article 137. Any other application for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in the schedule three years. So that limitation act is flexible in the sense it is not. It is not possible for any legislature to contemplate different types of suits. Different shades of meanings and different combinations and permutations and provide period of limitation. Even if it is attempted there may be loop holes and there may be a particular suit which may satisfy several articles. And it may lead to complications. That is why specified articles are there for specific items. And then a residual article for suits that is article 130 which provides for a period of limitation of three years. Likewise in the applications also. When there is no other article which applies to the particular application. The residual article will apply. Now how to compute the period of limitation. It is not very easy always. When I used to ask the question to all the judicial officers and all the advocates whenever I get occasion. And I put a question practical problem when we deal with article 12. And my experience is that when there are 30 or 40 participants. None sometimes answered correctly and even if answer is there only one off. This problem arises among advocates also when a paper is presented when an appeal is presented to the high court. And the registry may object saying that there is bar of limitation. Sometimes there may be a delay of one day or two days which the advocate might not have seen. If it is an appeal there is no problem. The delay can be controlled but no stay will be obtained in the meanwhile unless and until the delay is controlled. But so far as suit is concerned there is no question of condoning any delay. So dear friends the advocates practicing in the trial court if a client approaches you. You have to first see what is the case. And if the client says that we have to file a suit or do whatever that is necessary. The client may not know that it is a suit. He may say he may produce a pronoun or a check before you or may say that there is an oral loan. I am not getting it back. He may say the date. And then first you have to see whether tell the client also whether it is barred by limitation. If it is barred by limitation you cannot do anything court cannot do anything. The court has no power to condone the delay filing the suit. Why because section five which provides for extension of the period of limitation. Applies only to appeals and applications other than an application under order 21 of the code of suit procedure. So so far as suits as well as an application for execution. There cannot be any condonation of delay by the court. Court has no power. So when an advocate is approached first he has to see that he is filing it within time. And if already there is time lag you have to tell the client that it is already barred. So that nobody will point out that you are mistaken and therefore you are not fulfilled your part of the promise you are not complied with the requirements of a advocate and all those things. So that there is no room for any complaint. For example, there is only last day only one day. What is the period of limitation say for three years. The cost of action arose on 1120 15. Let us take it that there is a promissory note or a check or any other agreement or so which is dated 11 2015. Let us take it that the period of limitation is three years. What is the last date for firing the suit. Put that question to your audience. Just a simple question. 11 2015 is the date on which the cost of action arises. That is a date of execution of the promissory note. Time starts from that date and the period of limitation is three years. Three years. What is the last date on which you can find this very last day. There is only one last day. Please ask the participants to post their answers on the chat box itself. We have muted everyone. Yes. Can we wait for one minute? This is a very simple question. 11 2015 that time starts. That is a date of execution of the promissory. The period of limitation is three years. What is the last date on which the suit can be fired. And remember there is no provision for condonation of delay of filing a suit. Court has no power. So you have to file within the period of limitation. What is the last date? Did you get any answer Mr. Vikas? Yes, sir. We have received plenty of messages. Some are saying 11 2018. Some are saying 31st of January 2017. Majority are only on this issue as to whether some are writing 11 2018. Majority. Majority is they are equally divided on 11 2018 31st of December 2018 and 11 2017. No, some are even gone to 11 2017. That is two years. That is two years. That may be a mistake. Yeah. So the last date is. Everybody is feeling that they are playing fastest finger first. They are playing like just like ABC fastest finger first without even sometimes examining it in the perspective. Yeah. Can I answer with a reset? Yes. So the last date is 11 2018. Three years. Really three years will expire on 31 12 2017. Starting from 11 2015. That is a date of promissory note. We count from that date. The three years will expire on 31 12 2017. But the last date for filing the suit is 11 2018 because section 12 one of the limitation act provides for exclusion of the first day. Exclusion of time in legal proceedings in computing the period of limitation for any suit appeal or application. The day from which such period is to be reckoned shall be excluded. So 11 2015 is the day from which the period of limitation is to be record the date on which the cause of action arises. That day is to be excluded in view of section 12 one. If that is days excluded three years will expire on 11 2018. That is the last day. So it is easy. 11 2015 just add three years. 11 2018. That is it. So there is no difficulty whether it is 30 years, two years, 12 years, one year. No problem. 11 2015 then just add three years, three years. 18. You need not calculate 365 days and all those things. Because the reason is this. One, the day on which the cause of action arises the limitation is to be reckoned that days to be excluded in view of section 12 one. That is a reason why 11 2015 three year period so expires the last day occurs on 11 2018. I think I might the position clear. Now. See the articles. There are three columns. There are three columns. Description of the suit. Have you seen that description of the suit. Period of limitation. Time from which the period begins to run. These without these three columns being considered. It is not possible to compute the period of limitation, particularly the third column is very important. Time from which the period begins to run. That is most important. So the calculation and computation has to be made with reference to these three columns. And these three columns you may see several types of suits different periods and the periods. It differs from one year to 30 years. 30 days to 30 years. Maximum period under the 1908 act was 60 years. Now it has been reduced to your maximum period of 30 years. There are 15 days, 30 days like that. When it comes to applications. One year 90 days 60 days 30 days like that. 10 days. 30 days, 30 days, 60 days like that. And the maximum period is 30 years. For example, a suit against the government, suit for redemption of mortgage, suit relating to mortgage for closure, all 30 years, maximum period. So it was 60 years, instead of that, it is done like this. Now, there is a doctrine of limitation. The doctrine of limitation is based on a theory. There is a Latin maxim. Vigilante bus, V-I-G-I-L-A-N-T-I-B-U-S. Vigilante bus, non-N-O-N. Dormantibus, D-O-R-M-I-E-N-T-I-B-U-S. Next word, Jura, J-U-R-A. Next word, subvenient, S-U-B-V-E-N-I-U-N-T. The meaning, laws come to the assistance of the vigilant, not to the sleepy. That is a principle on which the limitation act is based. Law come to the rescue of the vigilant, not the sleepy. And there is another principle that it is necessary that title to the property, etc. and matters in respect of rights in general should not be in a state of constant uncertainty and doubt and suspense. There must be certainty. Now you may ask a question. So you have got a promise to re-note with you. You have to get that money. You have to file a suit. Period of limitation is three years. You are delayed by one day. Heavens will not fall down if one day is over. What is the principle on which the limitation act is? Is it not harsh? Why can't the court be given power to extend it? If it is to be extended, what is the meaning in saying that it should be only for a few days, few months or a few years? It can be any number of years. Appeal, appeal, condonation of delay, 30 days, there may be one year, two years depends on the reason. It is a reason that matters. Delay can be condoned by the appellate court in filing an appeal. Likewise, an application which otherwise, it is not the extent of delay that matters. It is the reason why there was delay. But so far as suits are concerned, as I mentioned, there is no question of condonation of delay and one may think that it is very harsh. Suppose you are on the opposite side. You are the other client. How many years you have to wait, seeing whether the other side will file a suit or not. You cannot be expected to wait indefinite. So there must be certainty. And so far as the limitation act is concerned, the commentaries say that when the act falls, it falls. There is no escape. So on a first look, it may appear that the limitation act is harsh. But it is not harsh when you look from the side of the opposite party. There must be certainty. If you are going to file a suit, file it within time. Otherwise, the opposite party will be always in the dark. Now, the object of the limitation is to prevent disturbance or deprivation of what may have been acquired in equity, justice by long enjoyment or what may have been lost by a party's own inaction, negligence or latches. This is what the Supreme Court said. You may see AER 1973 Supreme Court, 73 Supreme Court, 2537 Rajendra Singh and others versus Shanta Singh and others. Now, what are the salient aspects of the limitation act? Accepting the report of the law commission, no illustrations are provided here, incorporated in the act. The old act contained reasons and it was thought that the illustrations often lead to uncertainty and it may sometimes become complicated. Therefore, illustrations have been taken away. Old limitation act regulated suits, appeals and only some obligations. But the present act applies to suits or and other proceedings and the for purposes connected with it. The maximum period as I said was 60 years under the 1908 act, now it is 30 years. Definition of applicant, etc., not necessary. Then I said about the scheme of the suits. Limitation act is an amending and consolidating statute. This is 1963 act. It provides for all the contingencies it deals with. There is no scope for further endgrafting any exception on the rules of the act, on the ground of hardship. There is no question of and it is held in AER 1962 Supreme Court, 1716 that in construing the provisions of the limitation act, equitable considerations are out of place. No equitable consideration, no discretion, nothing. AER 1962 Supreme Court, 1716, the fixation of the period of limitation to some extent arbitrary and may frequently result in hardship even then it is to be construed as the language of the statute is plain meaning imports. The courts are not concerned with the policy of the legislature or with the result in giving effect to the language used AER 1972 Supreme Court, AER 1972 Supreme Court 1548. The court should not take into extraneous considerations such a hardship in construing the provisions of the limitation. Now another question whether limitation act is exhaustive or whether some other laxity can be given and it was held the Supreme Court held in AER 1964 Supreme Court AER 1964 Supreme Court 227. I will quote the limitation act is a consolidating an amending statute relating to the limitation of suits appeals and certain types of applications to courts and must therefore be regarded as an exhaustive court. Probably the Supreme Court in 1964 was dealing with a case of 1908 act not under the 1963 act that is why some applications it is said. Now all the applications are being dealt with under the act but the principle that it is an exhaustive court is the same under the old act or under the new act. It is a piece of subjective or procedural law and not of substantive law. These are all the principles which we have to bear in mind. It is not a it is an objective piece of objective or procedural law and not of a substantive law. It is a consolidating an amending statute and it is clear from the long title an act to consolidate and amend the law of limitation of suits and other proceedings and for the purposes connected with this. This is the reason why this act was introduced in 1963. Now there is a theory that the limitation only bars the remedy and not the right. It is true also. So I lent money to you. I got a period of limitation for firing a suit against you. That period is over. I have to get 10 lakhs from you. You had executed some document in my favor. I failed to file the suit within three years. That is a period of limitation. Does my right extinguish? My right is to receive the money back. Your duty is to pay it back. It is true that I lost the remedy because I did not file the suit within time. Has my right expired? Answer is no. Right did not expire. Right is there if there is a contract after the period of limitation. Section 25 of the Indian contract that covers it. It is valid. It is supported by good consideration. There can be an agreement to pay even a bar debt. There is nothing wrong. Nothing. It is not against public policy. People may agree. It is not the hard rule that there should be always within period of limitation. One should come. Parties may agree. That is why section 18, section 19, 18 provides for acknowledgement and 19 provides for part payment. Suppose I have to get 10 lakhs from you. You are not in a position to pay within that period of limitation. Say for example, three years, you approach me. You ask me to give some time. You say that instead of 10 lakhs, you will pay one lakh to me. I receive that one lakh. I make a note on the document on which the liability is created. And it is in your handwriting. Your signature is there and it is dated. Then a fresh period of limitation starts from that date. That is section 19. Or if there is an acknowledgement of liability, section 18 will apply. There also a fresh period of limitation will run. It is not the policy of law that the parties should, whenever a right across, should rush to the court. Parties may agree for anything.  It can be extended, extended, extended up to 50 years, 100 years. Nobody will ask why. There can be an acknowledgement. Fresh period will start to run. There can be part payment. Fresh period will apply. It is not the policy of law that whenever there is a right and the infringement of right, parties should always rush to the court. Parties have the option to agree between them and to modulate their liabilities and rights. And I said that generally, the general principle is that the limitation only bars the right, bars the remedy and not the right. It does not extinguish the right. There is an exception to that rule that is contained in section 27, 27. And the expiry of the period of limitation provided and the determination of the period hereby limited to any person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be extinguished. I said about the liability to pay back money on the base of a document. I said that the right, the right is not lost, only the remedy is lost. But I got an item of immoral property. I was in possession. You ousted me. You trespassed upon the property and reduced the property in your possession. That happened two years back. I knew about it. It is to my knowledge and you asserted that you are the owner and you kept possession uninterrupted, hostile and to my knowledge. And it is not suppressed. It is not hidden. It is not a clandestine thing. You proclaim to the whole world that you are the owner and not me. And you continued in possession. You perfected title by address position that comes under article 65. And then my right will expire. My right has expired. Right has got extinguished. This is the exception to the general rule that the limitation only bars the remedy and not the right. The right itself will get extinguished. So when I, when it is clear that my property was trespassed upon by you on a particular date and you continued uninterruptedly, openly, peaceably and without interruption for 12 years. My right to institute a suit to get sparked. My right itself will get extinguished. So far as other suits are concerned, I said, you, you have got a, you took a loan from the bank. You took a loan from the bank. Bank did not file the, you did not repay. The bank did not omit it to file the suit within time. Omitted to file the suit within time. What is that? The remedy is lost. Right to recover that amount. Right to receive that amount is not lost. You have got certain fixed deposits in the bank. It attains maturity. Bank can appropriate that amount towards the barred debt. It is legal. Why? Because the right is not lost. Remedy only is lost. Remedy to approach the civil court is lost. But on attainment of maturity of the fixed deposit, the bank has got a right to appropriate it towards the barred debt. Likewise, you owe a debt to me. I did not file the suit, but some money due to you comes to my hand. And I can appropriate it towards that debt. There is no harm. So that is a principle generally limitation only bars the remedy, but does not extinguish the right. Exception is this, 27. Similarly, when a debtor has several debts, the creditor can adjust the payment made by the debtor towards even the barred debt. A barred debt may constitute a valid conservation for fresh contract, section 25.3 of the debt contract. Then whether limitation bars the defense? Whether limitation bars the defense? The answer is this. I will read a small passage. Limitation ordinarily does not bar the defense. A defendant will not be precluded from setting up a right by way of defense, even if he could not have done so as a plaintiff by way of substantial claim. This would have been barred under section 25 or 27 of the Limitation Act. If it is regarding property 25 or 27, 25 is 27. It is also not applicable to set off or counter claim since section 32B of the Limitation Act provides that any client by way of set off or counter claim shall be treated as a separate suit. Except this defenses are not barred. Even if I will give an example, there is an agreement for sale. I agreed to sell my property to you. I did not execute the document. You did not file a suit for a specific performance. Within time, you were put in possession of the property at the time of agreement. You continued in possession. After the period of limitation is over, what is my right? I have title to the property. I continue to be the title holder. I can file a suit based on my title. Then you set up a defense that there is part performance under section 53A of the Transfer Property Act. Then defense is not barred. My suit for specific performance is barred. But your defense, your suit for specific performance is barred. Your suit for specific performance is barred. My suit is also barred. I am not particular. But you cannot file a suit for a specific performance and get the document because three years period is over. Period of limitation is over. But you are in possession. You continue to be in possession. I am being the title holder. I institute a suit for recovery of possession based on my title. Then you can set up the plea of part performance by defense. Why? Because you cannot file a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. Your defense of part performance is not barred. Generally speaking, the defense is not barred by the efflux of time. Exceptions are there. Section 25 and 27. And on that point, there is a decision of the Supreme Court. AER 2002 Supreme Court. AER 2002 Court 960 NCC citation. Srimanth Shamrao Surya Vamshi versus Prahlad etc. etc. Another Surya Vamshi. That is held. Section 53 A TPA Act that is all discussed in that decision. So that if you read that, it will be very clear.  That is a very important question. Very, very important question.   You will not get an answer if you read the various sections. You will not get. That is why I am stressing on it. The participants can post the answers to the same. Yes.  So, meanwhile, check your net also because there is some sometimes disturbance at your end. Oh, what to do. It seems I have got the message. No, I think the message is on my side. It says my net is the same. Ah, nice. See, sometimes such mistakes occur, sometimes such difficulties occur. Almost every weekly twice I am doing online classes where there is no difficulty. It goes on well. But even yesterday I tried on the lake. It applies to quasi-judicial authorities as well. I realize that it is everything right. What is the answer? Majority has said that it is applicable. What is the answer? Majority have said that it applies to the quasi-judicial authorities as well. Both the? It applies to the quasi-judicial as well as the court. Both. Quasi-judicial. Except one has said that the special act would prevail over the general act. If you read sections up to 31 and articles up to one that you will not get the answer to this question, you will get the answer only from the judiciary. That is why I put that question because people commit mistake on it and various cases go up to Supreme Court. Even, say, the latest decision by Justice Rohit Nariman in what is that case, MP Steel Corporation. MP Steel Corporation. This is discussed in very great detail. And Limitation Act applies to courts and not to quasi-judicial bodies or tribunals. Not to quasi-judicial bodies or tribunals. Please note the following decisions. Please note because if you search in the book, you will not get it. Commendaries, if you carefully read, you will get it. But not in the barricade, not in the statute. A.R. 2005 Supreme Court. 2005 Supreme Court. 1, 2, 0, 9. Parallel citation. 2004, 11 SCC. 11 SCC. 4, 5, 6, 3 judges. Justice SB is in or out the judgment. Name of the case is LS Synthetics Limited. LS Synthetics Limited versus Fair Growth, Fair Growth Financial Services Limited. The provisions I am reading only few sentences. You may see paragraph 33, 34 and 39, paragraph 33 of that judgment. I am even from that paragraph I am reading only one or two sentences. The provisions of the said act are not applicable to proceedings before the bodies other than courts such as quasi-judicial, tribunal or even an executive authority. It does not apply unless it is confirmed or be confirmed. It automatically applies. So if a proceeding is before a court, you need not say that the limitation act will apply, it applies. If it is a quasi-judicial authority, administrative authority or any other authority, if the limitation act is to be applied, it has this particular statute, special statute must provide it. Otherwise, it will not apply. The difficulty arise when we read 29 and 2 is the most complicated portion of the limitation act. Let us see 29 and 2 just once. We will explain it later. 29 and 2, it is complicated. On reading, you will not understand. One will not normally understand. Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application, a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the schedule. The provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law. The provisions played in 4 to 20 sections 4 to 24 shall apply only in so far as and to the extent to which they are not expressly excluded by such special or local. This I will explain in great detail because this is a very important aspect in the limitation act. This is connected with the question which I could also, but I will give the citation and you read it. There are several decisions on that point. Now, 2015 volume 7 SCC 582, Justice Sikri and Justice Rohit Nareman, MP Steel Corporation versus Commissioner of Central Access. MP Steel Corporation versus Commissioner of Central Access. The provisions of the Limitation Act apply only in respect of proceedings prosecuted in courts proper. Courts has understood in the strict sense of being part of judicial branch of the state. Principle that court always lean in favor of advancing the cause of justice where a clear case is made out for doing since justice and reason is at the heart of all legislations. Now, this MP Steel Corporation, you read it, you will get and it is very difficult to read and understand it also because sometimes you may get fed up because of, because there are several decisions discussed and the judges discussed it in a great detail. Therefore, please don't get frustrated. You deal with it, study it and then also there is another important case Mukri Gobalan versus Amubhakar Mukri Gobalan versus Amubhakar. In some cases it is only Gobalan versus Amubhakar. That decision was dealt with in MP Steel. What is that Mukri Gobalan's case? It arose from Kerala, our state. There is a Kerala Building Slees and Rent Control Act. It was originally rent controller, who is a person and designator, person and designator, not a court. Later, the act was amended. Building Slees and Rent Control Act was amended and the nomination of that authority was changed to Rent Control Court and every Munsif who is specifically nominated for that purpose, it is not a person and a designator. A Munsif is appointed in a particular place. He did not be nominated as such. He becomes the Rent Control Court so that there is not attached to a special person. It is attached to a question arose. There is a period of limitation for filing an appeal against the order of the Rent Control. It lies before the appellate authority. Originally, it was also a person and a designator. Now, it is a court. District court is not arose from the application because it is not a suit but an application. RCP, Rent Control Petition. Therefore, delay can be controlled. Appeal can be done. Delay can be done. Appeal. Even otherwise, it is an appeal. Whether the appellate court, appellate authority has got power to control it. There, the Supreme Court said in Mukri Gowal that in being the district judge, district court, it is a court and it has got all the trappings of a court and therefore, the limitation act will apply its well-settled principle in Mukri Gowal. Several decisions were cited, approved and Mukri Gowal's case was of MPC. Please read MPC paragraph 14. And it was held, I may say, quite inappropriate that Mukri Gowal does not hold good. That is not correct. Because Mukri Gowal was cited, Om Prakash versus Ashuni Kumar Bensi. 1995 5 SC. Mukri Gowal is 1995 5 SCC 5. Distinguishable on facts. It was the district judge who was discharging the functions of the appellate authority in the decision which was cited. It was held that the district judge functioning when appellate authority was a court and not person and a signature. And therefore, entitled to resort to section 5 of the limitation act. That is not so in the instant case where the run controller appointed by the state court is the Punjab civil service member and therefore, a person and a signature would not be entitled to apply the approach of the limitation act section 5. That is another decision which is referred to in Mukri Gowal's case, paragraph 22, paragraph 22. Please see that. But wrongly enough, in a P Steel Corporation, it is said that Mukri Gowal does not hold good. And later the Kerala High Court held that that is not correct. And that is we cannot say that the Supreme Court is wrong, but said that Mukri Gowal is alright. It applies because when MP Steel came hundreds of cases went off the file because the appellate authority has no power to condone delay, the courts interpreted like that. Later a Kerala decision came, said that the appellate authority has got the power to condone delay. The thing is this, if it is a court, you need not say that the limitation act will apply. It automatically applies. If it is a quasi judicial tribunal or an administrative authority, you have to say in the special statute order or any other regulation, whatever it is, that the limitation act will apply or will not apply whatever, will apply. So, there are certain special statute which provides that the period of promotion, so the limitation act will apply. There are certain special statutes. Once that sentence is there, all the provisions of the limitation act which are applicable will apply. Now, another aspect today, we have to close it at 7 o'clock. Is it not, Mr. Vikas? So, we don't go strictly because in the today's invite, we have not written, sometimes we write 6 to 7.15. So, today I knew that you elaborated more, we have not given the upper cap. Yes, I am prepared to take it for 2 hours, 3 hours. I know that, I know that. But it is not good because it is always the concentration level is, it is said that it is only for 20 minutes. Especially once we are talking of limitation act. Yes. At the time is the essence. So, any number of times I will appear, no problem. We will limit it to 1 hour or 1 hour, 15 minutes so that we can have a number of things. Yes, another thing which I would like to bring it to your notice is the scheme of the act. There are, please note down. Please note down because you will not get it, the commentaries or the statics, which I have noted. I may be wrong or may be right. I think it is mostly, I believe that it is right. But the wording may be sometimes confusing. But anyhow, please note for your reference, not for examination or anything. There are several types of categories of cases coming under the Limitation Act. So, we will say, generally, period expires and plus exclusion. You may note the exclusion. Section 4, note it. Section 4, extension of the period. So, could you repeat 2 last 2 lines because the audibility was an issue? Last 2 lines. Last 2 lines, kindly repeated because there was an audibility. Expiree plus exclusion. Is it audible? Yeah, it's fine. So, you can keep it at a normal distance but it was somehow. Expiree plus exclusion. Section 4, next extension. Section 5. Next is providing same period. Providing same period. Note like that. We will explain later. Providing same period. Section 6 and 8. Next category is continuous running. Section 9. Next category, no limitation. Section 10. Next category is exclusion of period. Section 12, 13, 14 and 15. Next heading, effect of death. Limitation starting later. Section 16 and 17. Fresh period. 18. Section 18, 19 and 22. 18, 19 and 22. I committed a mistake. Section 6. I said continuous effect of death. Limitation starting later. I said 16 and 17. It is wrong. 17 is fraud. Please go off 17. Only 16. Sorry. Fresh period. Sections 18, 19 and 22. Extinguishment of right. Extinguishment of right. Section 27. This is generally we will in the subsequent classes, subsequent webinars, we will discuss this when we come to various sections. See how wonderfully the various promotions have been drafted and how it is arranged and how these promotions are to be applied. I said about that it is not the policy of law that everybody should rush to the court. I said about the acknowledgement of liability or payment 18 and 19. What will happen if a person becomes insane? What happens if a person is a minor at the time when the limitation is to be record? All these are covered. Various promotions and computation of the period of nutrition. I said that there is difficulty which every lawyer should master. Why I told my fellow advocates, friends, young lawyers and to the judicial officers particular that when a question arises whether there is a judicial so far as a judicial officer is concerned when a lawyer says that his appeal is within time and the registry says that it is not within time. It is ultimately the judicial officer who has to decide that issue. So he must be fully conversant with that provision. Section 12 interpretation and how it is to be compute practical side. Likewise, the lawyers also must be very bold, very well equipped with respect to this computation of the period of limitation and finding out the last date because otherwise the people in the high court registry or the court registry will say that no, no, your appeal is bad. Then that person will have to make an application to condone delay. Sometimes unnecessary. The person, the clerk who is dealing with that case may be under the wrong impression that it is bad. Sometimes it happens. The even I had occasion, I had several occasions where my appeals were returned saying that the appeal is belated, bought by time. Then I will answer how it is not. Then they will accept the explanation. If it is bought, I will file an application. Say anybody can commit mistake. But it must be, you must be able to point out that this is the provision. This is the, this is the net result after computing the period of limitation. How you arrived at that conclusion? Why you arrived at that conclusion? So you must be bold. You must be able to say that. Otherwise, what will happen? Even for computing the extended delay, I have seen the miserable part of it. What is that? It is an appeal which is delayed. In the application for condoning of delay, you have to state the number of days of delay. That is a requirement. Otherwise, many of the, I don't know what happens in other courts. There is no provision as such. But it is usually, if it is 10 days or 15 days, you have to say in the affiliate that there is a delay of 10 days or 15 days. In the application also, you have to state that to condone the delay of 15 days or 30 days, whatever it is. So to compute that extent of delay, how to compute it? So what is being done is that while typing, there will be a blank left. The advocate's clerk will go to the registry and ask them what is the extent of delay that they will fill up. Or some people type it 15 days delay. The registry will say, no, it is 20 days. Then there is a whitener which cannot be done on half of it. Without the signature of the party, it is not proper fluid. The clerk will use this whitener and then make it do. I will say that it is an affront to the advocates because the advocates should be able to tell the registry people that this is the correct law. So it is not, you need not depend on the advocate's clerk. You need not depend on the registry people. You have to equip yourself with all these practical tips. We will do it. I will give you examples. I will try my best to, if it is not an open class, if it is only webinar, but to the extent possible, we will do it. And by constant application and constant exercise, you may attain that. You may find it proper. Yes. I think we can close it now. What next? Nothing. As such, there are no questions, but only one thing. Since we are doing part two, would you just enumerate what will be explained in the part two so that those who have been connected with us on the YouTube Facebook, as well as in this session, they would know that what will happen in the part two as such. Part two, I will deal with, say I said about the general scheme of it in the present episode. Now I will be dealing with section two, three and four. Two, three and four, and if time permits, five. Yes. But five itself is quite elaborate to be an extent. Yes. And there are 75 episodes on YouTube lectures. If you are interested, you may listen to that. Sometimes it may be useful to you. YouTube channel of Sir is by Justice KT Sankaran. You can visit that. You will get a lot of sessions on CPC as well as. There is an app also. That is www.justicektsankaran.com stroke LA that is limitation act LA small letters. If you give that, you will get all the episodes in that. Yes, I've seen that you have also created a playlist. One is of limitation act. I don't know much of it. You are. I've seen that there are playlists for my expertise. I depend on my son to do it, except that I will record it on my own and upload it. I read it. Only I know that. I don't know the technicalities. You have already explained to us as an advocate. One should know the law so that one can put it across. So once you have told it, people will create the playlist or people will search it. So don't want to connect with them. They can always watch KT Sankaran's YouTube channel. They are in the right manner. He has explained with great clarity, just like we enjoyed today. I consider it as my contribution to the project. The same here. And same is with Prem Raj, who is running by the Nittles Lettles. Prem Raj is actually connected with Shyam Patman's program. Or you can say vice versa. Prem Raj knows all the decisions. He's a wizard. So he's praying also with love and Raj is to rule. So he rules with love. Yes. So those who are connected with us or who have joined for the first time, they can also connect to our YouTube channel, Facebook page and Instagram of Beyond Law CLC. They can like, share and comment so that people can also come to know. Before we conclude, I will ask Mr Prem Raj to give a capsule from what he has learned today. So he's himself learned, but learning from a person like your knowledge is always a pleasure to hear. Yeah, Prem. Well, to deal with this particular topic of limitation, you have really selected a really wonderful speaker. Just as Katie Shankaran, whom I consider is the finest legal brain Kerala Haiko has ever produced. That is my humble opinion. And just as Shankaran, he is hailed by the bar for his legal and literary acumen who has always been acknowledged for being so pleasant, yet absolutely forthright and an upfront person, I would say. He was, of course, an outstanding and hardworking judge known for giving a very patient hearing for everyone which reflects in many of his landmark judgments. And personally, I have a deep admiration, abounding affection and respect for him as he has carried on his constitutional duty by remaining conscious of the social realities, exhibiting absolute fairness, respect and dignity to all those people who has come before him. And as a judge, he was the fulcrum on which the judicial system was balanced, and which in turn, of course, was a cornerstone of a very democratic nation as we all know. And today, what I could learn was that the law of limitation is a procedural law which is founded on a public policy and it prescribes certain periods ranging from 10 days to 30 years, and after the expiry of which a suit and the proceedings cannot be maintained. Law of limitation, it ensures that the parties do not resort to directly tactics and avail the remedy promptly. It does not create or extinguish the rights, except as provided under section 27. And of course, just as Shankaran had told that the limitation bars the remedy and it does not extinguish the rights, and he had given us a schematic representation of the limitation act, which consists of 32 sections in which two are repealed, that is 28 and 32. So in effect, we have 30 and totaling up 137 articles divided into three parts. The suits dealing with articles 1 to 113, the appeals articles 114 to 117 and the applications articles 118 to 137. This is what I could learn. And of course, he had pointed out a very famous decision that is A.S. Krishnapa Chettiar versus Rahiya Pachettiar, the 64 Supreme Court ruling, which said that the limitation act is exhaustive. And mind you, in that particular judgment, went out to even say that the Indian courts are not permitted to travel beyond the provisions of the limitation act to add or supplement them. Anyway, thank you so much. Looking forward to hear more from you. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Prayam. Thank you, Prayam. So dear friends, Prayam, as you used superlatives, forget it.  No, sir, I meant what I said. Probably, today, since we have dedicated our session to Justice Mohanab Shantagore, I was just reading on the LinkedIn, since we were never fortunate enough to hear him when he was in Karnataka in his fairway, he said, the most tough thing in life is that even if you are extraordinary, you remain ordinary in all times. So that's what I'm saying that the session was extraordinary. But to remain humble and ordinary is the right tribute to Justice Mohanab Shantagore. So thank you, everyone. Stay safe. Stay blessed. And like we have also started posting on the invites also, maintain social distancing and wear masks. That is the best way to move things forward. And seminars we do not know when we will take up. But yes, webinars from the persons like Justice Katie Sankaran would always be a treat to hear and it will continue to remain. And tomorrow's session would be at 4 p.m. Law relating to admissions and conspiracy, interplay between CRPC and evidence. This is by Chenendia Elsa Phillips. She's an assistant professor in CMR legal department in CMR college, CMR University, Karnataka. So do stay connected with us tomorrow. Thank you. And thank you, sir. So second session, we will decide the date whatever you want to look. Can you say next three or four Sundays it will do? So we will decide it accordingly. Immediately I will call you up. Yes. Next Sunday, thereafter also, thereafter also I am free. I will call you. I will post it on the social media also. After the webinar I will call you. Today on the Facebook and YouTube I was seeing that they have a large number of participants watching it. So everyone stay safe. Stay blessed. Thank you.


Hey, if you're new here, my name is Craig Beckton. In this video, I'm going to take you behind the scenes using high-speed sync mode. For this shoot, we're shooting in high-speed sync mode. So this image here was shot with a shutter speed of 4,000. Now, the reason why you might want to use high-speed sync is if you're shooting outdoors on bright sunlight and you want to shoot at a wide aperture, like say f-14, which we are for this shoot, then this is perfect for it. If you don't have a strobe that does high-speed sync, you could also use an ND filter. But anyway, we're using the Godox 8600 Pro, which is allowing us to shoot up to shutter speeds of 8,000. Now, for our modifier, we're using the 36-inch Westcott RapidBox XL and the iLighter 2 for fill. You can see there, it's filled in all the shadows nicely. And normally, you probably would use the iLighter 2 in the studio, but I decided to try it outdoors. And what we're doing here is trying different lighting patterns. So the first one was a butterfly lighting pattern, or a clamshell, because we're using fill. Now, this one, we're just off to the left of the model. So you can see we're just using it 45 degrees and down, and about 45 degrees to the left. Now, I'm standing on these little elevations and having her do that too, because I want to break the horizon line. I don't want that crossing along between her head. So we want that horizon line either below her neckline or above. So you can see how that's cutting right there. I just like the way that looked as far as the composition goes. Now, we're just really just moving this light around and going through a number of different poses. And I'm making adjustments to the position as we go. And you can see we still have the sun as a hairlight. So this is actually a two light setup, just using the sun as a hairlight, and then using our modifier. Now, we shot this, I'd say about two hours before sunset. And I'm really just sort of working the shot, working the poses, and trying to sort of give subtle direction as far as creating lines in the image as well. So you can see here too, we brought in a prop, and then I'm just saying just touch that modifier so you're about two to three feet within that. And we started it up with a little bit higher. So for a Rembrandt lighting pattern, and then you'll see that image in a second. And then we also lowered it to create a little bit more lighting on our face because I didn't want the hat to block the light. You can see I'm lowering that modifier again. And it's just a matter of sort of looking at the back of your camera, making some little tweaks to your lighting setup. You can see that right there. So that's a shot. And so it's a matter of just sort of working your modifier from left to right and getting a variety of different lighting patterns and really finding something that works. I really like this combination of the hat and the light in that position. And again, we still have the sun as a hairlight. So a couple of tips that I could pass on. Also too, you can see we have two sandbags there. If you're shooting outdoors, make sure that you have something sturdy like a C stand that we have here. And then also make sure that you have a couple of sandbags. If you don't make sure that you have somebody there holding the light just for safety reasons. Anyway, I hope you enjoyed this video. Give me a thumbs up if you found these tips helpful. Hey, it's Greg here again. If you found these tips helpful, give me a thumbs up for this video. Also, if you're not already a subscriber, just click on subscribe and click on the bell notification and you'll get updates when I release new video tutorials. Also, if you want to share this video, just look below this video. You can click on share and you can share this video on photography groups and forums. All right, thanks for watching this video. And if you have any comments or questions, just leave them in the comments section below. All right, I'll see you in the next video.