So having this game earlier, I've played multiple classes and on every one of them, there's a certain weapon you eventually come across early within the game, which in my opinion is without that the best early weapon to get you started until you earn better and higher level loot. Today I'll show you where it's obtained and how to upgrade it. How's it going guys, my name is DP journey, if you enjoyed the video leaving a like really helps out and if you like what you see and want to see more by all mutant be sure to subscribe. So even in this game there are tons of weapons, millions of combinations before you actually get a chance to craft that awesome gear, you need something to help you on your way and this item is without that the best I've come across early on. So this weapon is called the old world clunk fist, it's actually a weapon or tool you pick up along the campaign but really early on. Now when I first got this, I didn't use it over my other class weapons I already had, but when I did eventually switch to it I realised it's actually an incredible weapon and it helped make the game much much easier for me early on in terms of fighting enemies. So this clunk fist you get super early on like I've said and because it's now early days I don't really want to spoil anything for you but you'll soon get to a point in which you have to take down an enemy tired up called the fluff hawk.  Now it's a weapon first off but it's actually a useful tool at the same time as this is used to break down walls not only to uncover progression paths but also to unlock shortcuts within cave systems and many other secrets. Now this weapon has amazing and powerful combinations in which you can find out how to do them within your inventory menu, it's got great air of effect attacks and it is super powerful. Now this item can even be upgraded to make it better and to do this it's pretty simple you need to complete a side quest full click called high voltage. Now I don't want to ruin any story or anything like that like I've said but a quest can be found right here as you can see on the screen now via the map. It's relatively straightforward in what's needed to be done here as it sees you making your way to a power station pressing a switch taking out a certain enemy and then returning back to click and then guys this is upgraded and I'm pretty certain guys it probably gets upgraded further than this but for sure within the early stage of this game this is probably the best weapon you can get for both destruction and to use as a tool in unlocking paths to progress and find those hidden secrets. So yes as soon as you unlock this guys be sure to use it and make sure you level it up too and on that note the end of the video has arrived if you enjoyed it even a like really helps out if you're new around here and want to see more bio mutant be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I upload can turn notifications on by hitting that bell button but guys thanks as always for stopping by and hopefully I'll see you on that next one


Hi everybody, Joe for jazby's casebreaks.com coming at you with 21-22 upper deck artifacts hockey Five bucks pick your team is six with a free box giveaway if you bought the Requisite number of teams at the end. Yeah, you have to buy at least three all-card ship here It's the second half of the inner case we've popped open speaking of hockey I think there's We've got some Preseason hockey or Golden Knights and my Kings Big thanks to this group for making it happen Kings are also last spot mojo Thanks everybody for getting in I guess the regular season starts when? the 11th remember I marked all of these Six so we know they're from the same case in the giveaway box from a different case right over there Just off off camera to my left right over here is Got my phone set up watching Thursday night football on Amazon Prime Matt Ryan smashing helmets into the bench He's not happy It's been kind of a pedestrian game six six three minutes up in the third quarter. Well, that could have been the first touchdown of the game But no threads of time Jeff Carter nice Kings Jeremy Carter Carter Varigee very hey Gotta work on that 72 and 99 and it'll be for Florida. That's gonna go to Jeremy got Kyle Conner to 199 and Michael Bunting artifacts rookie card to 999 for Toronto. That's gonna go to Gerald New King Kevin Fialas scored a goal today in preseason action. There's Quinn Hughes to 499 and We got a nice Alexi LaFreniere orm card nice Rangers that's gonna go to David and a five out of five Ross Colton Dual relic looks like a piece of the the lightning Tampa Bay lightning badge And a laundry tag nice one for Tampa Bay David. Oh Got the lightning in the filler and All aboard the Big Head Express There's a Quentin Bifill to 999 King's hoping that he takes it to the next level. We'd love to see that. All right next one To More train whistles was another green foil. No, that's the 99 Blake Wheeler We got Ugo Pekka Laconian to 25 That's for Buffalo and Rangers edition of Eric Lindross, which always trips me out. I think of him as a flyer that will go to David and Laconian will go to Jeremy and Buffalo Keith Yandle to 499 Florida for Jeremy And Boris Katschup to 999 that's for Tampa Bay Be for David a maximum contois for Anaheim David David Pasternak for the Bruins to 499 and that's for Dan Drew Dottie Kings last bottom mojo that goes to Jeremy. Let's find him a hits for you And some Kings hits. All right next box Broncos have been involved in some kind of bad score lines What was it? What was that one game against? The Niners I was 11 10 now. They're another leading the Colts 9 to 6 Here's Jason Zucker 3 out of 15 For the Penguins Pittsburgh it goes to David David Chan David. Oh David see a couple of David's We got a Tim Stutzel. Nice. You're one rookie sweaters for Ottawa Kevin. There's Wyatt County For Chicago, that'll be for David C there is a Jake Leichen and that's what I'm going to go with and Cole Cofield From Montreal, that'll be for Gerald and Jeremy has Vegas Another Alexi Lafreniere Orham card that goes to David C in the Rangers and the Rangers had a nice Nice season last year. We got a Threads of Time Tyson Berry for Colorado. That's for Gerald Alexander Barkoff 2 out of 10 Florida, that's for Jeremy Two more boxes to go. All right. Good luck. We got Netgear Connor Halibut Winnipeg Be for Jeremy. There's Rasmus Kopari to 999 For the Kings Jeremy We got a Klajiru Orham card for Stephen K and the Flyers Fly Flyers Fly sorry Braden point Johnson Dallin for the Sharks and another Quintenbeifield for the Kings to 499 different foils Another Orham card That's Marcel Dion old King for Jeremy Jeremy Stittum and the Kings Pick them up before the remaining teams were pulled for that filler last spot mojo and Jack Hughes 16 out of 199 For David Oh, New Jersey Eric Lindross Rangers edition final box What's going on you're experimenting with what Brandon Richards? So I'm experimenting background music while watching me break and and falling in reverse Zombified it makes it all height There's no right or wrong way to watch Jaspies just as long as you're watching us All right. Good luck There's Logan Couture to 499 our final box Logan going to San Jose. That'll be for Jeremy Port. Oh and a 3 out of 65 Ty Smith dual relic for The Devils New Jersey Devils that'll be for David Oh Cam York to 799 dual relic for the Philadelphia Flyers Stephen K Matthew Barzol for the Islanders to 299 And an HL remnants Kevin Fiala Wild edition going to Dan in Minnesota Kings down 4-2 now in the last minute of the second period to 65 that's Grigori Dennis Enko and Gary Chavres to 599 Trevor Zergis to 499 and Marsh salt as well for Vegas All right, there you go gang nice little artifacts break Sure, we'll have some more hockey available as we As we get deeper into the season as more stuff gets released. Let's give away that box So let's sort everything by your first name here so Chris Only got one Dan you got so we at least three teams on this one, right? Three teams one entry so Dan gets three teams So that's one entry David C. Got three teams. That's one entry David ended up with six teams. That's two entries Gerald got three that's an entry Jeremy ended up with eight teams for the purpose of the promo The six count that's still two entries Kevin Had four but you still got three so that's one entry And that's it So that's a one and a chance to get a sealed box So you got Dan David C. David those two spots Gerald Jeremy's two spots and Kevin So one and a chance to get an extra box so name on top after Three and a five eight times we'll get a sealed box one Two three four five six seven And eighth and final time after eight. It's Gerald. I Gerald I don't know if I called your name too often in this break, but after eight you get a sealed box Go on your way. We can send it to you. So you can sell it if you want to you can rip it yourself If you want to if you get something cool, definitely let us know On maybe you can tag us on social media at Jasper's breaks on Twitter at Jasper's breaks on Instagram I'll see you next time everybody for the next break. Bye. Bye


So protein drugs that sounds like an awesome innovation. Why aren't all drugs protein drugs? Well, there are a couple of advantages and drawbacks here The on the plus side here We mainly had the specificity This specificity It's a bit unfair to only have one line for that But this specificity means that I can get this to target almost anything I want I have much more freedom if I want to make this hydrophobic or hydrophilic All the rules in the book that we've talked about for protein folding, you know the diversity right? I can do almost anything here and proteins are in general great at packing to other proteins So in addition to specificity, I can say efficient binding Although those are really part of the same property On the minus side on the other hand What do I have here? Sorry, there's one more part here. There are few side effects Why? Well, if I only bind to the right targets, right? I'm not going to have a whole lot of off-site binding and if there is no off-target binding, I won't have side effects On the minus sign the problem is that it is broken down And it's not just broken down in general This is broken down in your stomach by the proteases Meaning that we need injection Now if this is a life-saving cancer drug, I bet you won't mind getting an injection now and then But if it's a headache drug, you probably don't want to have an injection every time you have a headache, right? Unfortunately, there is another part of that too. This also clears fast What do we mean by clearing? Well, clearing is that when the body is getting rid of this We're pushing it through the liver or our kidneys and it goes out in the bathroom This is in general good for proteins and everything our body is designed to do that But for a drug you want a slow and steady release of a drug and if this is clearing fast You're now going to need maybe an injection three times a day. That's even less fun Again, if it's a cancer drug, you will do it But if you're a pharma company, you're looking for a drug that you can sell a lot and pharma companies hate drugs that have to be injected It's a almost a deal breaker Are there ways we could get around? Well, yes, there might be. Remember in the early lectures of this classroom when we spoke about properties of amino acids And there are particularly two parts that are intriguing here One of them is the D versus L amino acids and I mentioned biocompatibility So there's all our amino acids Including the proteases that are responsible for breaking things down our L amino acids Designing things with D amino acids might help us do something that is bio orthogonal And then it's not going to be broken down as quickly and maybe not clear as quickly That would be awesome Another possibility is to use artificial amino acids artificial meaning not one of the 20 natural ones that our body is used to use That too might enable you to have a protein that isn't quite as compatible But this dude, this is a very active development There are a whole lot of companies buying new companies that are specializing and so Biologicals is the collection name for all these drugs that are really biological compounds in particular peptides and proteins


Live from Seattle, Washington, it's The Cube at Tableau Conference 2014 brought to you by headline sponsor, Tableau. Here are your hosts, John Furrier and Jeff Kelly. Welcome back. We are here live at the Tableau Conference 2014 in Seattle, Washington. I'm Jeff Kelly with Wikibon. You're watching The Cube. As we've been talking today about a lot of the themes here at the show at Tableau Conference, obviously customers is an important theme. The product is an important theme, but partners is another important part of the picture here at Tableau as they're growing, their partner ecosystem is growing. And we've got one of their important partners here, Treasure Data, Hannah Smalltree, director at Treasure Data is joining us on The Cube. Welcome back. Thank you. Thanks for having me back. So yeah, so I know you just got into town this morning. So you haven't been to the show for too long, but what's your take on the vibe here? It's good. Obviously, they seem to be pretty excited, these customers. It has been an exciting day as we were just talking about off-camera. People are really excited about what they can do with Tableau. And I'm really excited to hear more about what they can do with their data when it becomes easy and simple to access and analyze it. So yeah, so set the stage for us for our audience about Treasure Data. You guys are fairly new on the scene, but been doing a lot of work for a number of years though, kind of building up the infrastructure and the service. Tell us a little bit more about Treasure Data. Yeah. So Treasure Data launched our service about two years ago. It's a cloud service for managing massive volumes of big data. So things like event data and log data, sensor data that's coming from different products like smartwatches or cars or other vehicles. So we help manage data that comes in at high velocity, often high volume. Our customers need us to help them manage millions and billions of data records a day. So we provide capabilities for them to easily collect streaming data, high volumes of it, store it in our cloud service, and then analyze it so their analysts can use SQL or, as we're talking about today, Tablo to analyze the data. So we really turn to Tablo for those visualization capabilities of big data. Treasure Data provides the big data back end really quickly and efficiently. You don't need any special skills to use it. And Tablo provides that pretty visualization for the front end so you can visualize big data. And your cloud base, so there's no kind of installing servers. It's all through the cloud, right? Some people call it software as a service for big data or I'm hearing big data as a service. But we are all in cloud base and with Treasure Data, we're also managing and monitoring and maintaining the service for our customers. So not only are we cloud based, you don't need to know anything about managing cloud infrastructure. We handle all of that. So that's a fully managed service. That's different than a infrastructure as a service or even a database as a service where you've got to still manage your environment. This is completely, soups to nuts, the entire package delivered as a service. Yep, our staff are data experts. That's what they like to do. So when you're talking about the amount of data, the type of data that your customers are interacting with, gets me thinking about the Internet of Things, Industrial Internet, whatever you want to call it. The smartwatch, obviously Apple had their big announcement yesterday with the Apple Watch. I'm wearing my jawbone. So talk a little bit about what you're doing in that space. I think there's huge opportunity there, but it's really early days. People are still trying to wrap their heads on the concept, let alone actually, what are we going to do with all this data? What's your approach and what are you seeing in that market? Yeah, so in the last couple of years, we had first started with a lot of application logs and web access logs. And then increasingly, we've seen a lot of interest in sensor data. Last week, we had an announcement with Pioneer, a big electronics company that we all know about. They do a lot of work with automotive manufacturers. So working with their onboard devices to collect data about the operation of the car and other things going on around it. We're working with them to collect that sensor data. They will use that sensor data to develop services for other people in the auto manufacturing chain. So the repair shops, the insurance companies, the car rental companies. So they're using sensor data to do some really interesting analysis around how we can make driving our cars a better experience. And we're also, as I mentioned, working with some wearables companies. They're using sensor data to figure out how to build a better product. So as we have all of these smart, connected products, many of them are generating data. Our customers are interested in using that data to provide services to their customers, to understand how people are using their products and services. But sensor data is massive. It comes in really fast and furious. And it can be very difficult to even just collect and put in one place. Right. With the innovations going on in the sensors themselves, and how small they are, how powerful they're getting, I mean, there isn't any kind of physical device you can think of that can't be outfitted with a sensor these days. So the volume of data is just going to explode. It's proliferating. I can't say that word so quickly. So we're expecting upwards of 30 billion devices connected to the connected internet. And when you think about all those devices sending out data points every minute or even every five minutes, that very quickly gets to be a massive volume of data. And data collection is a huge bottleneck for companies in these internet of things implementation, just physically figuring out how to move that data around and get it to one place where you can get value out of it. Well, yeah. And the other thing is just the storage implications, which is why I like the cloud approach. We've done a lot of research at Wikibon around, we do our research core research areas are big data in cloud. But of course, where they intersect is where we get really interesting, which is the space. That's where we are. That's exactly where you are. Talk about that market generally, not treasured data specifically, but where do you see the big data cloud market, for lack of a better term at this point? There's a lot of, certainly a lot of opportunity, but there's still some of those issues around privacy, security, can I move my data off-site? How do you see that, do you see that conversation evolving? Are the concerns that your customers might come to you changing? How do you see that progressing? I think things have changed so much. And especially in the last decade, full disclosure, Jeff and I both used to work together, as journalists, and we've seen huge changes in what people think of when they think about the cloud particularly. So big data in the cloud are very well suited for each other. The data types we're dealing with are typically remote, so they're already outside the firewall. So that's thing number one, when you're talking about different remote data sets, mobile applications, websites, already outside your firewall. So people are much more comfortable with aggregating that outside of the firewall, and then just moving the valuable data into the enterprise where they can manage it. That also has the benefit of, collect it outside the firewall, billions and billions of rows, run some queries, do some analysis with treasure data to make it much, much smaller, and then bring it behind the firewall. But I see a lot more understanding of how the cloud works, a lot more appreciation of the fact that these are new data types. We're not talking about taking your finance database and uploading it to the cloud. That's the kind of thing people typically do want behind their firewalls. So we're talking about these new data types, these things that are already outside your organization. How can you effectively bring those together and make sense of them? And then bring the important stuff into your organization. Yeah, I mean, you really need a fundamentally new approach to managing data in this space where the amount of data, the type of data is just exploding. So we're here at the Tableau conference. I understand you have a customer here, I think giving a case study presentation. Talk a little bit about your customers, that customer. What are some of the things your customers, your joint customers with Tableau are doing? Yeah, so we have several joint customers with Tableau. We do have a partnership. As I mentioned, Tableau provides the very important visualization capabilities on top of treasure data. Tomorrow morning, our customer, Muji, a global retailer, will talk about how they're using treasure data and Tableau to help support a new loyalty program. So Muji is a, it's a really cool store. There's many stores throughout the United States. I encourage you to check them out. They're sometimes called the Asian IKEA. So they make a huge line of products, different housewares. They're actually in a lot of different businesses. And they have a lot of customers online. They have a lot of customers offline. And they really wanted to understand customer behavior as best they could. So they came out with a new mobile loyalty app. They're using treasure data to help collect all of the clicks, what people are doing in that mobile loyalty app. They're also looking at clicks on their website. What are people doing on their website and who are those users? Then they're correlating that data from the mobile app and the website. They're putting all of that into treasure data, where they're doing different queries and analysis to understand how people are using the website and mobile app. Then they're also taking a subset of that data and putting that into their cloud data warehouse, Redshift in this case, which has a different set of capabilities. There, they're combining it with other data from e-commerce and POS systems so they can understand things like how do my high value customers use the mobile app or use the website? And what incentives can I give them to do more with us to go into stores? So actually they had an interesting challenge around driving people online into their physical retail stores because a lot of us buy more when we're in the retail store and we can pick it up.  Indeed. So I'd love to talk about a little more about Tableau, the company. Your take on what they're doing, their strategy. So they're growing like crazy, as you know, in terms of revenue, in terms of employees, in terms of partners. Kristen Shabbo, the CEO announced yesterday they're going to invest more in R&D in the next two years than they have in their previous 10 years. Do you think that's a good strategy at this point for Tableau? I mean, that's a really big investment to be putting back into the product. I know from an investor's perspective, maybe they'd like to see a little bit of that money return to investors, but I know the customers love it because that means new functionality. I'm guessing partners like yourselves think it's a great move as well. We really appreciate Tableau and Treasury data have a similar philosophy about providing a simple interface to do very powerful things. But as any of us who have tried to build a simple interface to do powerful things know, that is not easy. And that's kind of what Apple's done really well too. So simple intuitive interface, those things cost money, but it is worthwhile money if you can empower your organization to take advantage of new data sources using these cool interfaces and making it really easy for different types of users to consume different data types. Yeah, so we had Jack McKinley on earlier who oversees visual analytics for Tableau and he talked about that. He goes simple is great, but if it's not useful, then it doesn't matter. So it's not easy to be simple. Simple and powerful. Simple and powerful, right. Really difficult combination. It's easy to be simple. I can develop a very simple tool. It doesn't do anything. Exactly. So to combine the usefulness, the power, and then the simplicity is a real, if you can pull that off, I mean, we saw what Apple, I mean, that's what Apple's philosophy right now. And it takes money and it takes smart people. It does. And if you want to do it fast, it takes more money and more smart people. Exactly, exactly. So in terms of the rest of the ecosystem around BI, how do you see Tableau? I mean, as you mentioned, we worked together, we covered this market for a long time. You've got, you know, Tableau came in really as a disrupter to the traditional enterprise, software, business intelligence vendors, the SAPs, oracles of the world. But they've been around for a little while now and now we're actually seeing what I might call the third generation of BI tools. You're seeing cloud, cloud first companies come about who are offering BI tools, some focused on just mobile BI. So Tableau's not the new kid on the block anymore. How do you see them responding now in terms of, you know, they've got kind of competition on both flanks? I think what's interesting in the BI market is it started out as one kind of tool and then there were all these different competitors in the market. And really, as we started to have all these different kinds of BI tools, different tools made sense for different groups of users. So similar to some of our early surveys that we used to do, nobody, very few people have just one BI tool. They have one BI tool maybe for this group, maybe the data scientists need a different type of interface. What's important is that everyone's working at the consistent data set and everyone has a similar understanding of the data. But I think that there are room for different analytics tools. That's the first thing. Tableau's done a very good job at reaching a group of business analysts who I believe were underserved by some of the other tools. So some of the enterprise reporting features were not giving people the power that they needed. And so I think Tableau's done an excellent job at reaching out to a large underserved market and giving them a tool which made it very easy for them to do the type of analytics they want. That said, I think there's still room for other tools that do more specialized things in vertical industries or have different sets of capabilities. Some of these other new BI tools do some of the other tools work with Tableau and you think they're competitors, you dig into it, you say, oh, no, they're actually partners and they work together and they complement each other. And as long as you're working off a consistent data set like you will get from a treasure data or another backend, it's okay for people to bring their own tools to the game. And what's interesting is the cultural impact of tools like Tableau. So the idea is we hear about democratizing data, democratizing business intelligence, but it's also democratizing, if it's not coupled with a cultural change, democratizing decision-making authority in a company, it's almost like, well, what's the point? So if you're going to provide a tool like Tableau to your frontline workers to find actionable insights in their data, you've also got to give them authority to take those actions. Are you seeing, in terms of your customer base, how are they dealing with some of these cultural shifts as data becomes more ubiquitous? People have new tools where they can come up with their own insights. They don't necessarily have to go to IT.  And now they've got all this actual insight, but you've got a couple that, again, with the cultural change to actually give them the authority to do that. Are you seeing that in your customers? Absolutely, and it's interesting. Another topic near and dear to our hearts is data governance, kind of a boring topic, it seems like, but when you dig into data governance, it's really important for people to know the kinds of decisions that they are empowered to make and to know the boundaries of those decisions. So we actually encounter, our customers encounter similar challenges because we're democratizing access to big data. We're making it very easy for anybody who knows SQL can now run analysis on big data. But it's still a similar problem than what it's always been, dances with data. We can interpret the same data point different ways. I can take an Excel spreadsheet and manipulate it to prove my point. So at the end of the day, you have to come back to data governance, you have to understand the data sources, and you have to have agreement on how you're going to interpret them. So things like good old data governance and data stewardship, I think that's also what's leading to roles like the chief data officer, who is really starting to oversee all of these different data initiatives because there has been a bit of a governance problem. On the one hand, it's good, that's great for innovation that we're all out doing stuff and building things, but as a business, you do need to be cognizant. Data's very valuable and how you interpret it, those interpretations are almost more valuable. Yeah, in some ways, it depends who you ask, from an innovation perspective, people are like, yeah, it's great, people are experimenting, they're looking at new ways of exploiting their data, you talk to like a chief risk officer and they're scared to death about what's on these capabilities. Some of it is about just where you let that go. You can come up with all the fun stuff you want, but do not put it on Twitter, do not let it outside the company, you can bring it to a meeting and we can all talk about it, but having those governance rules around how data can be used and understanding that some data's more valuable than others, some stuff you can go crazy with, you can do whatever you want with, and some stuff you really can't. And so, the need for effective governance is more important than ever. Yeah, and the other challenge is that these rules and norms are still evolving, you don't kind of know where, what they're going to be yet, and there's going to be missteps, and unfortunately for some people they're really going to step in it, and it's going to be, that's how we learn lessons as an industry, but somebody's going to take the fall sometimes, but hopefully at the end of the day, we're moving forward and creating more value than risk. Than less, yeah, absolutely. Well, we've got time for one more question, so I just want to hear what's on your roadmap. Obviously, you guys are growing as well. What's kind of top of mind for you? What's your to-do list over the next six, 12 months? Yeah, so as I mentioned, we're doing a lot of really interesting work with customers who either make large applications or large websites, reaching lots of people. That's kind of been our bread and butter, and we're continuing to grow those capabilities, expand our SQL support. We just announced new capabilities for collecting mobile data, so data from different kinds of mobile apps and mobile devices, we make it very easy to stream that into our service so you can analyze it with SQL very easily. And then just more and more, we're seeing interest in the connected world, so internet of things. Different wearables companies, we're working with several wearables companies. Vehicle telematics has been another area, as I mentioned, with Pioneer. We've worked with a couple other telematics companies, energy companies with sensor data. So there's a ton going on with sensor data, but I also, I don't want to let go of the fact that there's still lots of app logs and there's lots of data out there that's not being stored that there's huge potential with. So we're just seeing people, especially as they realize how easy it is to look at this data with treasure data, storing more and more data and doing more and more interesting things with it. So I'm just excited to see people store more, analyze more, combine more interesting data sets and really be able to play with data without limits, without the technical limitations we experienced in the past. Absolutely. Well, we'll be looking forward to all of that and we'll see you again on theCUBE soon.  A veteran on theCUBE, I encourage everyone to come. Oh, we have a new blog too, so at treasuredata.com we have a new blog. I'm a midway through a post right now, so really trying to get a lot more news out there about treasure data, so please work with us and try our service, you can try it for free online at treasuredata.com. I'd love that approach, the cloud approach. Cloud approach, try free, no credit card. You know, then buy, buy, then drink. It's great stuff. Get on it. Great. Well, Hanna Smalltree from Treasure Data, thanks so much for joining us again. We'll see you on theCUBE again soon. Thanks for watching everybody. We'll be right back with our next guest after this.


Hello and welcome back here to the channel. I'm evil rabbit So with the track being out for a week the secret Easter egg track has been found So we're gonna go take a look at that track here today So if you guys don't know where it is you guys can find it yourself But before we do that, I would like to thank coldest water for sponsoring another video here on the channel The coldest water bottles 36 plus hours 13 plus hours hot 36 plus hours cold backed by thousands of Amazon reviews All various sizes coffee cups thermal thermos is tumblers even dog bowls Make sure you guys check out coldest water calm everything and will be in the link in the description box below and make sure when you You go to check out you make sure you use promo code EVL 10 for 10% off your entire order. That's the coldest water EVL 10 for 10% off. Let's get back to the action alright, so when I say Easter egg track when this track was designed we did put a Secret track or Easter egg track in it. It wasn't super hard to find But it is surprising that it took as long as it did to find unless people found it never said anything So we'd go take a look at that track because you don't know it's there Could miss it and if you don't know how to get to it you definitely could miss it So definitely been getting a lot of great Reviews from people on this track. Everybody seems to be loving the track. Oh God Super slippery in the front Everybody's been loving the track and loving everything about it, and I can't you know express How much I appreciate all the support from all you guys on the patreon and everything getting this track out there and Having a lot of fun with it some exclusive videos and things are gonna be coming out for the second and third tier Patreons here on the channel for you guys exclusive content this week for you guys for your first look at some Behind the scenes and modeling and things of that nature. So this secret track Was something we wanted to put in to see if people could venture out and find it You could find it on the map and if you looked at the map You could actually figure out where it is and it is on the other side of this bridge so The bridge does say construction zone. I got a shoelace in the side of my shoe and it's Hurting so we fixed that so it is on the other side of this construction zone so the wall Is actually Not a collider So if you've seen this If you would have just driven through it You'd find your way to this secret track on the other side of the bridge So it goes into a nice little Like a little downhill Section with some pretty cool walls and things of that nature and like I said if you didn't know it was here You would never even think to go find it So a lot of people did find it a couple people commented about it I asked them and they did tell me where it was so Bringing you guys the reveal of the easter egg track here on the evil rabbit playground Definitely a pretty cool track that is tucked away behind some pretty big mountains Forgot that turn now tightened up So I haven't driven this track I was super a lot on the online server when I've been on because I didn't want to kind of give it away But now that it's out here I feel like a lot of people are gonna be coming to this track and having some fun with it It is a very nice flowing track kind of off the beaten path With some you know nice scenery and nice walls tucked away in the outside back of the map So like I said, this was something we originally planned on having secret and Seeing how long would take people to find kind of a little Easter egg from Hexer and myself to you guys with track release So now you guys see where it is and Now you guys are gonna get the chance to come rip this secret track yourself It's just a lot of fun. It's a lot of very interesting elevation changes up and down it Closed both ways, which is really nice. Oh, and you can do stuff like that. I did not expect that and It's just a fun Fun little section of track Handbrake that too early Well, I clipped the grass so the HTC Z is Definitely gone to a little bit of a power chain if you notice the sounds a little bit different sounds very similar to my S14 It is up into almost 900 some horsepower now So we did do some modifying to this car to kind of bump up into more of a competition car But we are working on the new Polo rally car drift car as well But you know my love for Z chassis, so it's kind of why we are in the Z right now No left of break there Taking out that front clip So the little first-person action for you as well as third-person Don't think the Z has as much grip as it needs to I Think I need to adjust the tires because the grip of the Z is actually not as grippy as I thought it would be But these are 160 treadwear world of drift or tires, so That is why We are trying these tires out because we're trying for competition treadwear tires We're gonna run the track the opposite direction. Oh Which I think the track does run fairly well both ways So if you guys have actually found this track prior to me showing you guys the track right now I don't have any tires left. I keep forgetting that I blow through these tires in one or two laps Because we are on single with full damage So if you guys found this track before This video and me telling you guys about the secret track Let me know down in the comment section down below if you didn't even know this track was here also, let me know down in the comments below if you did not know the car was here because This is a fun track. Oh the colliders on this car. I forgot They are on the other style colliders that were giving me issues before I updated the two flies This is on the two five colliders, and I definitely need to Change that if I'm gonna be running this car some more So One other thing I want to talk to you guys about is Something that I am in the works with right now and that is going to be a EBL drift invitation I know I talked about this a while back on the channel was working on some 800 horsepower cars It's coming back the talks of if you guys heard talks of an EBL drift Invitational it is actually a thing I am going to be planning to be doing a drift Invitational tandem doing judging and transmitting things on the channel So that is something you guys want to follow me on Instagram as well as here on the channel To get all the information for that when I will be doing the drift invitations and things of that nature So with that being said what kind of cars would you guys like to see? Power-wise it is a 2.5 the original street cars. Maybe some new cars For the drift invitation series here on the channel. We're not a gas Well, and I got grabbed by collider. We're gonna go back to pits because collider fails So one thing with the track being released in the drift invitation It was something we can use the actual course that's up here On my playground for a competition everybody seems to actually love the FD style track here on Evo Rida playground a little short quick tandem track with the Good places to get some really good wall rides because of all the walls that are covering it off But it's also a great place to learn when and how to do a really tight tandem because it is a very short track and very small track which is Very tricky if you're first learning how to tandem it, but I also have other tracks in mind like Rockingham Doing the ESTA Daytona circuit maybe the ESTA Marina circuit and things of that nature So I just wanted to bring some attention to that as well as show you guys a little easter egg track that we put in here for you So make sure you guys follow me on all social media all of which are found in the description box below I hope you guys enjoyed this episode and are excited if you didn't know about that track to go rip that track You guys are a part of this because they're not part of the patreon yet I leave the link in the description box below or search me will rabbit in patreon to get access to the track And the server and everything like that So I'd like to thank you guys for coming back and watching another video and I appreciate all the support from all the patreon It's and everybody on the channel in the discord So as always I think yes for coming back and watching I'm evil rabbit. See you guys on the track


When we wash our clothes, we use detergents. These remove the grime, sweat and stains that we pick up in everyday usage. However, but what cost? Each time you use detergents, there is an environmental impact. First, what chemicals or substances make up a soap powder or a liquid? Do you know any? Pause the video and resume when ready. The chemicals used to achieve stain removal and whiter-than-white clothes are a complex mixture containing surfactants which allow the water and the greasy stains to mix, making stains removable. Soap powders or liquids are often basic to help disrupt chemical bonds, neutralising acids and so make the surfactants job easier. There are also enzymes, biological agents which break apart fats, proteins and starch found in food stains, fragrance chemicals are added to give your clothes that fresh smell whilst bleaches containing peroxide or fluorescent whiteners give your clothes a renewed brightness. Yet, before the detergent makes it to a washing machine, it has to be manufactured and that's where the environmental concerns lie. You may have heard the idea of carbon footprints. If not, then check out the video on this channel. It's estimated that for every mile an average car travels half a kilogram of carbon dioxide is emitted. In America, families on average do 300 loads of laundry per year. This means that the carbon footprint of laundry detergents for one year of laundry is approximately 218 kilograms per year. While this seems low, this only factors in the detergent's use and not the energy usage of the washing machine or drying appliances. When you consider all of the families across the globe that use detergents the carbon dioxide footprint is considerable. Secondly, the chemicals found in washing detergents cause problems if they end up in rivers or streams. Can you think what the issue might be? Pause the video and when you have an idea, resume. An answer is that the chemicals found in detergents are toxic to aquatic organisms. One such chemical is phosphate found in many washing powders and this causes eutrophication. This is when an increased amount of phosphate leads to greater numbers of plant and algal material building up in rivers or lakes. The problems start once the plants die. The bacteria that feed off the decaying plant and algal material uses the oxygen dissolved in the water. The reduction in the amount of dissolved oxygen leads to changes in the types of species in the lake. For example, commercially and recreationally desirable fish such as trout are replaced by undesirable fish such as carp because they have a higher tolerance to lower dissolved oxygen levels or can result in no fish at all. Due to these environmental concerns eco-conscious consumers have called for the development of green detergents. It's now possible to buy detergents that do not contain perfumes or dyes and they're typically phosphate free and biodegradable. In addition, they're designed to work in cold water. Can you think why? Pause the video and resume when you have an answer. The answer is that using a washing machine on a cold setting prevents electricity being used to heat the water and so minimizes the carbon footprint for each wash cycle. Other environmental approaches also include using concentrated formulas. This is so less packaging is used in the manufacturer of the soapboxes or cartons and also reduces shipping and or trucking costs to move the shipment. As a result, this uses less oil.


Dear colleagues, welcome to Psychiatry Talks. My name is Sanbachnin and I'm the author of Malignan Centralab, Narcissism Revisited, and other books about personality disorders. I'm a visiting professor of psychology in Southern Federal University in Ostov-on-Don, the Russian Federation, and a professor of finance and a professor of psychology in CSCUPs, the Center for International Advanced Professional Studies. Today I'd like to discuss psychoanalysis. There's no social theory that has been more influential and later more reviled than psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis burst upon the scene of modern thought, a fresh breath of revolutionary and daring imagination, herculean feet of model construction, a challenge to establish mores, morals, and manners. But psychoanalysis is now widely considered nothing better than a confabulation, a baseless narrative, a literary exercise, a snapshot of Freud's tormented psyche and watered 19th century middle-europa middle-class prejudices. Most of the criticism purled at psychoanalysis is by mental health professionals and practitioners with large access to grind. The truth is that few, if any, theories in psychology are supported by modern brain research. All therapies and treatment modalities, including medicating one's patients, all of these are still forms of art and magic rather than scientific practices. The very existence of mental illnesses in doubt, let alone what constitutes healing. So psychoanalysis is in bed company all around. Some criticism is offered by practicing scientists, mainly experimentalists or neuroscientists. Scientists in the life and exact physical sciences. Such diatribes frequently offer a sad glimpse into the critic's own ignorance. They have little idea what makes a theory scientific, and they confuse materialism with reductionism or instrumentalism, a confused correlation with causation. Few physicists, neuroscientists, biologists, and chemists seem to have plowed through the rich literature of the psychophysical problem. As a result of this obliviousness, they tend to prefer primitive arguments long-rendered obsolete by centuries of philosophical debates. Science frequently deals methodically with theoretical entities and concepts, considered, for example, quarks or even some forms of black holes. These constructs, these concepts, have never been observed, measured or quantified. These should not be confused with concrete entities. They have different roles in the theory. Yet when they mock Freud's trilateral model of the psyche, the id, ego, and superego, his critics do just that. They relate to his theoretical constructs as though they were real, measurable, concrete things. The medicalization of mental health hasn't helped either. Certain mental health afflictions are either correlated with a statistically abnormal biochemical activity in the brain, or they are ameliorated with medication. Yet these two facts are not in ineluctably facets of the same underlying phenomenon. In other words, that a given medicine reduces or abolishes certain symptoms does not necessarily mean that these symptoms were caused by the processes or substances affected by the drugs administered. Causation is only one of many possible connections and chains of events. To designate a pattern of behavior as a mental health disorder is a value judgment or at best a statistical observation, normal, out abnormal. Such designation is affected regardless of the facts of brain science. Moreover, correlation as I said before, correlation is not the same as causation. This is a very important distinction that very often is lost on the critics of psychoanalysis. Deviant brain or body biochemistry, once called polluted animal spirits, these do exist.  Nor is it clear which triggers what? Do they aberrant neurochemistry or biochemistry? Do these cause mental illness or is it the other way around? The mental illness caused the biochemistry. That psychoactive medication alters behavior and mood is indisputable. So do illicit and illegal drugs, certain foods, and all interpersonal interactions that the changes brought about by prescription are desirable is debatable and involves total logical thinking. If a certain pattern of behavior is described as socially dysfunctional or psychologically sick, clearly every change would be welcomed as healing and every agent of transformation would be called a cure. It's a cyclical argument. The same applies to the alleged heredity of mental illness. Single genes or gene complexes, gene arrays, are frequently associated with mental health diagnosis, personality traits, or behavior patterns. But too little is known to establish irrefutable sequences of causes and effects. Even less is proven about the interaction of nature and nurture, genotype and phenotype, the plasticity of the brain, epigenetics and the psychological impact of trauma, abuse, upbringing, role models, peers and other environmental elements. Nor is the distinction between psychotropic substances and talk therapy that clear cut? Words and the very interaction with the therapist also affect the brain, its processes, structure, chemistry and neural pathways. Admittedly, talk therapy does it more slowly and less discernibly, but perhaps also more profoundly and irreversibly. Medicines, as David Kaiser reminds us, in Against Biological Psychiatry, it's an article published in Psychiatric Times, Vol. 13, Issue 12, December 1996, David Kaiser writes that medication treats symptoms, not the underlying processes that yield them. So what is mental illness? What is the subject matter of psychoanalysis? Someone is considered mentally ill if, one, his conduct rigidly and consistently deviates from the typical average behavior of all other people in the person's cultural society that fits his profile, and whether this conventional behavior is moral or rational is not material. The second requirement is that the person's judgment, grasp of objective physical reality, is impaired. The reality test is impaired. The third requirement is that his conduct is not a matter of choice, but is innate and irresistible. The fourth condition is that the person's behavior causes him or her or others discomfort and is, therefore, the fifth condition, dysfunctional, self-defeating, self-destructive, even by the person's own yardsticks and standards.  Are these merely physiological disorders of the brain, or more precisely of the brain's chemistry? If so, can mental disorders be cured by restoring the balance of substances and secretions in that mysterious organ? These are echoes of the Middle Ages or even the ancient world, the humors, the four humors. And once equilibrium is reinstated, is the illness gone, or is it still lurking there, under wraps, waiting to erupt? Are psychiatric problems inherited, rooted in faulty genes, though amplified by environmental factors, or are they brought on by abusive and wrong nurturance upbringing? These questions are the domain of the medical school of mental health. Other practitioners cling to the spiritual view of the human psyche. They believe that mental ailments amount to the metaphysical discomposure of an unknown medium, the soul. Theirs is a holistic approach taking in both a patient in his entirety as well as his medium. The members of the functional school of mental health regard mental health disorders as perturbations in the proper statistically normal behaviors and manifestations of healthy individuals, in other words, as dysfunctional.  The sick individual is mended, fixed, when rendered functional again by the prevailing standards of his social and cultural frame of reference. In a way, these three schools are akin to the trio of blind men who render disparate descriptions of the very same elephant. Still, they share not only their subject matter, the aforementioned elephant, but to a counter-intuitively large degree, a faulty methodology. As the renowned anti-psychiatrist Thomas Zas of the State University of New York knows in his article The Lying Truths of Psychiatry, mental health scholars, regardless of academic predilections, infer the etiology of mental disorders from the success or failure of treatment modalities. This form of reverse engineering of scientific models is not unknown in other fields of science, nor is it unacceptable if the experiments meet the criteria of the scientific method and above all, falsifiability. The theory must be all-inclusive, unamnetic, consistent, falsifiable, logically compatible, monivalent, parsimonious, and so on. Psychological theories, even the medical ones, for example the role of serotonin and dopamine in mood disorders, psychological theories are usually none of these things. They do not satisfy the basic criteria of scientific theories. Psychoanalysis is not an exception. The outcome is a bewildering array of ever-shifting mental health diagnosis expressly centered around Western civilization and its standards. For example, the ethical objection to suicide, or to homosexuality, or to Sadomaso sex. Neurosis, a historically fundamental condition, vanished after 1980. Homosexuality, according to the American Psychiatric Association, was a pathology prior to 1973 and totally accepted practice afterwards. Sadomaso, Sadomasochistic sex, became legitimized in 2013 with the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Method. Seven years later, seven years after 1973, in 1980, narcissism was declared a personality disorder. Almost seven decades after it was first described by Freud. Anna Freud said, The more I became interested in psychoanalysis, the more I saw it as a road to the same kind of broad and deep understanding of human nature that writers possess. And that is true. Dostoevsky was, in many respects, one of the greatest psychology servers. Towards the end of the 19th century, the new discipline of psychology became entrenched in both Europe and America. The study of the human mind, either to the preserver philosophers and theologians or novel writers, this study became a legitimate subject of scientific, or some would say pseudo-scientific, scrutiny. The structuralist, Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Bradford, a teacher and others, embarked on a fashionable search for the atoms of consciousness, physical sensations, affections, feelings, images, in both memories and dreams. Functionally, headed by William James, and later James Angel and John Dewey, functionalists derided the idea of a pure elemental sensation. They introduced the concept of mental association. Experience uses associations to alter the nervous system. They hypothesized, correctly, as we discovered. Freud revolutionized the field, though at first his reputation was limited to the German-speaking parts of the dying Habsburg Empire. Freud dispensed with the unitary nature of the cycle. Instead, he proposed a trichotomy, a tripartite, or trilateral model, the id, the ego, and the superego. He suggested that our natural state is conflict, that anxiety and tension are more prevalent than harmony. Equilibrium, compromise formation, is achieved by constantly investing mental energy, hence psychodynamics, echoes, or physics. Most of our existence, said Freud, is unconscious. The conscious is but the tip of an ever-increasing iceberg. He introduced the concepts of libido and Thanatos, the life and death forces. Instincts, tribe, or drives in German, drives in English as well. The somatic, erotogenic phases of psychic personality development, trauma and fixation, manifest and latent content in dreams. Even his intellectual adversaries used this vocabulary, even in few with new meanings. The psychotherapy Freud invented, based on his insights, was less formidable than the theoretical construction. Many of its tenets and procedures have been discarded early on, actually, even by its own proponents and practitioners. The rule of abstinence, the therapist is a blank and hidden screen upon which the patient projects or transfers his repressed emotions. This was dispensed with free association as the exclusive technique used to gain access to and unlock the unconscious is no longer thus. Dream interpretation with a mandatory, latent and forbidden content symbolically transformed into the manifest, all these have literally banished within the first decade or decades of the practice. Other postulates, most notably transference and counter-transference, ambivalence, resistance, regression, anxiety, and conversion symptoms, all these survive to become cornerstones of modern therapeutic modalities, whatever their origin. So did, in various disguises, the idea that there is a clear path leading from an unconscious or conscious conflict to signal anxiety, to repression, and to symptom formation, the neurosis, rooted in current deprivation, or psychoneurosis, the outcomes of childhood conflicts. The existence of anxiety-preventing defense mechanisms is also today widely accepted. Freud's initial obsession with sex as the sole driver of psychic exchange and evolution has earned him the derision and diatribe of plenty. Clearly, a child of the repressed sexuality of Victorian times and the Viennese middle class, Freud was fascinated with perversions and fantasies. The edipose and electro complexes are reflections of these fixations. But their origin in Freud's own psychopathologies does not render them less revolutionary. Even a century later, child sexuality and incest fantasies are more or less topotopics of serious study and discussion. As Chris said in 1947 that psychoanalysis is nothing but human behavior considered from the standpoint of conflict. It is in the picture of the mind, said Chris, divided against itself with attendant anxiety and other dysphoric effects, with adaptive and maladaptive defensive and coping strategies and with symptomatic behaviors when the defense fails. But psychoanalysis is more than a theory of mind. That is the secret of its endurance. It is also a theory of the body and of the personality and of society. It is a social sciences theory of everything. It is a bold and highly literate attempt to tackle the psychophysical problem and the Cartesian body versus mind conundrum. Freud himself noted that the unconscious has both physiological instinct and mental drive aspects. Freud wrote, The unconscious is a concept on the frontier between the mental and the somatic, as the physical representative of the stimuli originating from within the organism and reaching the mind. Psychoanalysis is, in many ways, the application of Darwin's theory of evolution in psychology and in sociology. Survival is transformed into narcissism and the reproductive instincts assume the garb of the Freudian sex drive. But Freud went a daring step forward by suggesting that social structures and social structures internalized by the superego are concerned mainly with the repression and redirection of natural instincts. Signs and symbols replace reality in all manner of substitutes such as money. These substitutes, these signs, these symbols tend in for primary objects in our formative views. To experience our true selves and to fulfill our wishes, we resort to fantasies, for example dreams, screen memories, where imagery and irrational narratives displays, condense, rendered visually, revise to produce coherence and sense to protect us from sleep disturbances. These visual, irrational imagery represent our suppressed desires. Current neuroscience tends to refute this dream-work conjecture, but its value is not to be found in its veracity or leg the rope. These musings about dreams, slips of tongue, forgetfulness, the psychopathology of everyday life and associations were important because they were the first attempt at deconstruction. The first in-depth insight into human activities such as art, myth-making, propaganda, advertising, politics, business and warfare and the first coherent explanation of the convergence of the aesthetic with the ethic, the socially acceptable and the socially condoned. Ironically Freud's contributions to cultural studies may far outlast his so-called scientific so-called theory of the so-called mind. It is ironic that Freud, a medical doctor and neurologist, the author of a project for scientific psychology should be chastised this way by scientists in general and neuroscientists in particular. Psychoanalysis used to be practiced only by psychiatrists up to a certain point, but we leave it at an age when mental disorders are fought to have physiological, chemical, genetic origins, almost exclusively. All psychological theories and talk therapies are disparaged by hard, exact scientists. Still, the pendulum has swung both ways many times before. Hippocrates ascribe mental afflictions to balance of bodily humans, blood, flag, yellow and black bile. This balance was supposed to be out of kilt. So did Galen, Bartholomeus and Anglicus, Johann Wehr, Paracelsus and Thomas Willis, all attributed psychological disorders to functional fault of the brain. The tide turned with Robert Burton, who wrote Anatomy of Melancholy and published it in 1621. He forcefully propounded the theory that psychic problems are the set outcomes of poverty, fear and solitude. A century later, Francis Gold and Schwarzheim traced mental disorders to lesions of specific areas of the brain, the forerunner of the now discredited discipline of phrenology. The logical chain was simple. The brain is the organ of the mind, thus various faculties can be traced to its parts. Morale in 1809 proposed a compromise, which has since ruled the discourse. The propensities for psychological dysfunctions, he suggested, are inherited, but they are triggered by adverse environmental conditions. A Lamarchist, Morale was convinced that acquired mental illnesses are handed down to the generations. Esquirol, concurrent in 1845, as did Henry Modsley in 1879 and Adolf Meier soon thereafter. Heredity predisposes one to suffer from psychic malaise, but psychological and moral social causes precipitated. And yet, the debate was and is far from over. Wilhelm Geisinger published a pathology and therapy of mental disorders in 1845. In it, he traced the etiology of mental disorders to neuro-pathologies, physical disorders of the brain. He allowed for heredity and environment to play their parts, though. He was also the first to point out the importance of one's experiences in one's first years of life. Jean-Martin Charcot, an urologist by training, claimed to have cured hysteria with hypnosis. But despite this demonstration of non-physiological intervention, he insisted that his steroid symptoms were manifestations of brain dysfunction. Warren Mitchell coined the term neurostinium to describe an exhaustion of the nervous system. Today we call it depression. Pierre Jeanet discussed the variations in the strength of the nervous activity and said that they explained the narrowing field of consciousness, whatever that meant. None of these nervous speculations were supported by scientific or experimental or what we would call today medicinal evidence. This was not evidence-based medicine. Both sides of the debate confined themselves to philosophizing, to ruminating. Freud was actually the first to base a theory on clinical observations. Gradually, though, his work, buttressed by the concept of sublimation, became increasingly metaphysical. Its conceptual pillars came to resemble Berkson's Elan Vital and Schopenhauer's Will. French philosopher Paul Ricard called psychoanalysis, depth psychology, the hermeneutics of suspicion. Zygmunt Freud wrote a letter to Fleiss in 1900 and he said, I'm actually not a man of size at all. Nothing but a conquistador by temperament and adventure. In the Gospel of Thomas, we find the saying, if you bring forth that which is in you, that which you bring forth will be your salvation. And Zygmunt Freud kind of echoes that. He says, no, our science is no illusion, but an illusion it would be to suppose that what science cannot give us, we cannot get elsewhere. Harold Bloom called Freud the central imagination of our age, that psychoanalysis is not a scientific theory, it is in the strict rigorous sense of the word, has long been established and I accept it. Yet most criticisms of Freud's work by the likes of Karl Popper, Adolf Grunbaum, Haveloch Ellis, Malcolm Macmillan and Frederick Cruz, most of the criticism pertain to his long debunked scientific potentials. Today it is widely accepted that psychoanalysis, though some of its tests are testable and indeed have been experimentally tested and invariably found to be false or uncoraborated, while psychoanalysis today is widely accepted as a system of ideas. It is a cultural construct and a suggested deconstruction of the human mind. Despite aspirations to the contrary, psychoanalysis is not and never has been a value neutral physics or dynamics of the site. Freud also stands accused of generalizing his own perversions and of reinterpreting his patient's accounts of their memories to fit his preconceived notions of the unconscious. The practice of psychoanalysis as a therapy has been castigated as a crude form of brainwashing within cult-like settings. Feminists criticize Freud for casting women in the role of defective, naturally frustrated and inferior men. Scholars of culture pose the Victorian and middle-class roots of Freud's theories about suppressed sexuality. Historians derive and decrypt his stifling authoritarianism and frequent and expedient conceptual reversals and so on and so forth. No one gives him a break. Freud himself would have attributed many of these diatribes to the defense mechanisms on his critiques of course. Projection, resistance and displacement do seem to be playing a prominent role. Psychologists are taunted by the lack of rigor of their profession by its literary and artistic qualities by the dearth of empirical support for resurcerations and fundaments by the ambiguity of its terminology and ontology by the derision of proper scientists in the hard disciplines and by the limitations imposed by their experimental subject matter, humans. These are precisely the shortcomings that they attribute to psychoanalysis. But as I said, they are common to all psychology. Indeed, psychological narratives psychoanalysis first and foremost are not scientific theories but any stretch of this much-bended label. They are also unlikely to ever become scientific theories because it's not possible to repeat the experiments and falsifiability therefore is excluded. Instead, like myths, religions and ideologies psychological theories are organizing principles of reality of the world theories of mind, if you wish. Psychological theories do not explain the world at best they describe reality and give it true emotionally resonant heuristic and hermeneutic meaning. They are less concerned with predictive feats than with healing the restoration of harmony among people and inside people. Therapies, the practical applications of psychological theories are more concerned with function, order, form and ritual than with essence and replicable performance. The interaction between patient and therapist is a microcosm of society an encapsulation and gratification of all other forms of social intercourse. Granted, it is more structured. Granted, it relies on a body of knowledge cleaned from billions of similar encounters and still the therapeutic process is nothing more than an insightful and informed dialogue whose usefulness is well attested to. Both psychological and scientific theories are creatures of their times children of the civilizations and societies in which they were conceived context dependent, culture bound as such their validity and longevity are always suspect. Both hard aged societies thinkers and the softer recipients are influenced by contemporary values, mores, events and interpolations to use Alphaz's word. The difference between proper theories of dynamics and psychodynamic theories is that the former asymptotically aspire to an objective truth out there while the latter emerge and emanate from a kernel of inner introspective truth that is immediately familiar and is the bedrock of their speculations. Scientific theories as opposed to psychological theories need therefore to be tested, falsified and modified because their truth is not self-contained. Psychoanalysis was when elaborated a conian paradigm shift it broke with the past completely and dramatically. It generated an ordinate amount of new unsolved problems. It suggested new methodological procedures for gathering and period evidence. In other words it suggested research strategies. Psychoanalysis was based on observations however scant and biased. In other words psychoanalysis was experimental in nature, not merely theoretical. It provided a framework of reference a conceptual sphere within which new ideas could be developed and experiments could be constructed. That it failed to generate a wealth of testable hypotheses and to account for discoveries in neurology does not detract from the importance of psychoanalysis. Both relativity theories where and today strings theories are in exactly the same position in relation to their subject method physics. In 1963 Karl Justus made an important distinction between the scientific activities of Erklahn and Verstehen. Erklahn is about finding pairs of causes and effects. Verstehen is about grasping connections between events sometimes intuitively and not causally. Psychoanalysis is about Verstehen, not about Erklahn. It is a hypothetical deductive method for believing events in a person's life and generating insights regarding their connection to his current state of mind and function. And so we come back to the core question. Is psychoanalysis a science? Is it a suit of science or is it a sui generis? Psychoanalysis is a field of study, not a theory. It is replete with neurologisms and formalisms but like quantum mechanics it has many incompatible interpretations. It is therefore equivocal but self-contained, recursive. Psychoanalysis dictates which of its hypotheses are testable and what constitutes its own falsification. In other words it is a meta-theory. It is a theory about generating theories in psychology. Moreover, psychoanalysis as a theory is often confused with psychoanalysis as a therapy. Conclusively proving that the therapy works does not establish the veridicality, the historicity or even the usefulness of the conceptual edifice of the theory. Furthermore therapeutic techniques evolve far more quickly and substantially than the theories that ostensibly yield the practices. Therapeutic therapies are self-modifying moving targets, not rigid and replicable procedures and rituals. Another obstacle in trying to establish a scientific value of psychoanalysis is its ambiguity. It is unclear for instance what in psychoanalysis qualifies as causes and what as their effects. Consider the critical construct of the unconscious. Is it the reason for, does it cause our behavior, conscious thoughts and emotions? Does it provide them with a ratio explanation? Or are they behaviors, conscious thoughts emotions, are these mere symptoms of inexorable underlying processes? Even such most basic questions receive no dynamic of physical treatment in classic Freudian psychoanalytic theory. So much for its pretensions to be a scientific endeavor. Psychoanalysis is circumstantial and supported by epistemic accounts, starting with the master himself. It appeals to one's common sense and previous experience. Its statements are of these forms. Given X, Y and Z reported by the patient doesn't extend to everyday reason that A caused X. Or we know that B causes M, that M is very similar to X and that B is very similar to A. Isn't it reasonable to assume that A causes X? In therapy the patient later confirms these insights by feeling that these insights are right and correct, that they are epiphanous and revelatory, that they possess retro-addictive and predictive powers, and by reporting his reactions to the therapist's interpreter. This acclamation by the patient sees the narrative's formative value as a basic, not to say primitive form of explanation, which provides a time frame, a coincident pattern and sets of ideological aims, ideas and values. Kwanivera is right that Freud's claims about infantile life cannot be proven not even with Gedank an experimental movie camera as Robert Wilder suggested. It is equally true that the theory's ecological claims are epidemiologically untestable as Grunbaum repeatedly says but these failures miss the point and miss the aim of psychoanalysis to provide an organizing and comprehensive, non-tendentious and persuasive narrative of human psychological development. Should such a narrative be testable and falsifiable? And if it is not, should we discard it as the logical positive instances? I don't think so at all. I think it depends if we wish to treat psychoanalysis as a science or as an art form. This is the circularity of the arguments against psychoanalysis. If Freud's work is considered to be the modern equivalent of myth, religion or literature, it need not be tested to be considered true in the deepest, most profound sense of the word. After all how much of the science of the 19th century has survived to this day anyhow? Thank you for listening.


Hi, I'm Zor. Welcome to a new Zor education. Let's talk about sign of certain angles where we can really easily calculate the value of the sign. I call these angles basic angles. And primarily I'm talking about zero, P over six, which is 30 degrees, P over four, which is 45 degrees, P over three, which is 60 degrees, and P over two, which is 90 degrees. So let's call these angles major or basic or whatever you want to call it. And again, I'm considering sign of these angles because I can do it. I can calculate the value of the sign. It's not easy to calculate the sign of, let's say 19 degrees. But 30 or 60 or 45, that's easy. So that's what we are going to do. And I'm sure it's the basis for many different problems in trigonometry, which I hope I will eventually show you. All right, from the beginning. Let's return back to the basics. Our sign as a function is defined as an ordinate of point A on the unit circle where this angle counterclockwise from the positive direction of X towards the point A is equal whatever we want this calculation to be done with. Now, we are concentrating only on these values of angle which are in the first quadrant of the coordinate plane. We will talk about other angles a little later. So in this case, the angle X of A is one of these. So let's just calculate what is the sign for each case. Now, in case zero, well, if this angle is zero then A coincides with X, which means the ordinate, this position has coordinates one, zero, this is one, ordinate is zero. So in this particular case, obviously, the sign is equal to zero because ordinate is zero. Next, next is P over six, which is 30 degrees. So if this is an angle of 30 degrees, let's consider this particular right triangle. A, A, P over.  So this particular calculus is equal to lowercase P and this particular calculus is equal to Q because the coordinates are P and Q. Now, what do we know about this triangle? Well, if this is 30 degrees, then we know that an opposite calculus, which is Q, is half of a paper genus. Now, the paper genus is one because it's a unit circle. Q is our ordinate. So basically what we have come up with that the sign of P over six, which is 30 degree is one half of the ordinate. Next, P over four. Okay, let's consider this angle 45 degrees. Well, then obviously this is also 45 degrees, right? So we are talking about the right triangle with two-catchity congruent to each other. So P is equal to Q. Now, if P is equal to Q and P squared plus Q squared, which is a fifth variant theorem, is equal to square of a paper genus, which is one. Well, we are interested in Q, right? So we can substitute instead of P. We can substitute Q. We will have two Q squared is equal to one. Or let's multiply it by two. It's four Q squared is equal to two because I want to have a square root nice. So from four Q squared, if I do the principle square root on both sides, I will get two Q, right? Because two Q squared will be four Q squared. And on the right, I will have square root of two. So Q is equal to square root of two over two. So sine of P over four equals two this. Next, next, this is P over three over 60 degrees. Okay, so this is 60 degrees. Now, this is 30 degrees, right? Now, we have a very similar situation to before. We have an angle of 30 degrees in a right triangle, which means that the opposite catatus, which is P in this case, equals to half of the hypotenuse, right? So P is equal to one half. Now, hypotenuse is one. So again, let's use the Pythagorean theorem to find Q. We know that Q squared plus P squared is equal to square of hypotenuse, right? Or Q squared plus one quarter. P squared, right? It's one quarter equals to one. Q squared equals to three quarter. So Q is equal to square root of three over two because this squared would be three quarters. So we came up with sine of P over three equals square root of three over two. Last in this series is 90 degrees. When this angle is 90 degrees, it means we are turning all the way and A would coincide with Y. Now, it's ordinate, obviously, would be the ordinate of Y, which is one. The ordinate of point Y, which is an intersection of this unit circle with a Y axis, obviously it has a C sub zero and ordinate of one. So for sine of P over two, we have equals to one. Okay, so we have finished with these major angles. Now, how to deal with angles outside of the first quadrant? Well, let's remember the qualities of the sine. Number one, sine is an odd function, which means, so whenever angle is negative, from a positive direction of X, we go clockwise, for instance, this, which is exactly the same thing as this, by the way, because one angle is different from another by a period of two pi and sine is a periodic function. So for all these, we can use this. So for instance, sine of minus 30 degrees is equal to minus one half. Sine of minus P over three is minus square root of three over two, et cetera, so this is this. Now, what if it's in this quadrant? Let's say my angle is here. The third quadrant, and this is an angle. Well, let's continue this towards this point, so it's a diameter. And now, obviously, this angle is this angle plus pi. So we need a formula something like this. If this is X, this is X plus pi. So to calculate X plus pi, we can actually calculate sine of X plus pi. We have to calculate the sine of X and do something with it. Now, what should we do? Again, we know this property. We have discussed it when we were talking about properties of sine function. Now, if the angle is here, well, let's have a symmetrical relative to the Y axis. Obviously, this angle is equal to this angle minus this angle, right? So we need something like a sine of pi minus X. And again, we were discussing this property before. That's the same thing with sine X. Now, both cases are actually quite obvious from the geometry of this, because if these two points are symmetrical, it means their ordinates are the same. Now, if this point is centrally symmetrical relative to zero, then it means obviously that the ordinates are equal in absolute value and opposite in sine. So using these and these properties, we can find out any sine angle for one of the major angles which we were discussing. That's it for sine. I'm planning to do the same for all other functions. And I do suggest you actually to go to unizor.com and look through notes for this particular lecture, so you basically understand everything better. But it's a really simple material, and it's important only because we will probably have a certain number of problems related to these particular colleges of sine and other functions. That's it. Thank you very much.


Hello everyone, welcome back to another session in Dentistry and Work. Today's topic in Paradontics is Socoransky criteria for Paranodal Pathogen. So when a baby born, the baby's oral cavity is completely devoid of microorganisms. Not a single bacteria is present in baby's oral cavity. From where does the bacteria is coming from? So the baby gets these bacterias from the baby's mother, caregivers or any person who gets contact with the baby. So that's how it all starts. So all of us will be having many types of bacterias in our oral cavity. Not all bacterias are pathogenic, some are pathogenic, some are not very pathogenic. So the pathogenic bacteria also not present in the same amount in all person, all person's oral cavity. It may vary from person to person, depends upon the person's oral hygiene, its habits, its body health, the systemic diseases. And many factors are involved in depending upon the amount of bacteria, that is pathogenic bacteria. If a person is having a periodontal disease, the periodontal pathogen will be very high in his oral cavity compared to a healthy person. So the many types of bacteria is present such as Fusibacterium, Porphyromonase, Pryvortyla, Tryponema, the Plasmodium group, Tryponema, Denticola, many types of spirochetes and all these are various types of periodontal pathogen. So moving on to Sokran's criteria, if a group of bacteria or a group of microorganism is to be named as pathogen, it should follow these five principles. We have heard this principle before but not the Sokran's criteria. We have heard the famous coach postulates regarding the bacteria in the last of 19th century coach postulates. So it was rejected anyway but this is similar to coach postulates but in a different way. So what are the criteria for a group of bacteria to be named as pathogen, especially periodontal pathogen? The Sokran's criteria, the first one is these group of bacteria or microorganisms must be associated with a disease and there should be increase in number of organism at diseased sites. So if a particular tooth is having localized periodontitis, then we should have more number of that particular microorganism. The Porphyromonase, Dinjevalis or Actinomycetamcomitants, so compared to the other sites or compared to a healthy site. So that is the first criteria, there will be increased number at the diseased site. If that is happening, we can say that that group is a periodontal pathogen. And the second one is it should be eliminated or decreased in sites that demonstrate clinical resolution of disease with treatment. If we are doing a treatment to control the disease, it should be eliminated or reduced in number. If it is getting eliminated or if the count is getting reduced after a treatment, we can say that that particular group is a periodontal pathogen. Because it is subjected to the treatment modalities that decrease in number by the effect of treatment. The third one is it should be demonstrate a host response in the form of an alteration in the host, cellular or the humeral immune response. So you know when an antigen enters a body, what happens? The body's immune system tries to attack against it. The body tries to protect ourselves by making an immune response. So if a pathogen, if a bacteria, a group of microorganisms can create a host response, we can say that it is a pathogen. Especially in case of this one, it is a periodontal pathogen. And the fourth one is it must be capable of causing disease in experimental animal model. So all the things, if we can recreate in a sterile animal or an experimental animal model, we can say that it is a periodontal pathogen. So if we can prove the same disease, if we can create the same disease in a healthy experimental animal model, it could be a rat, it could be a rabbit or anything, we can say that it is a periodontal pathogen. And the last one is it must demonstrate the virulence factor responsible for enabling the microorganism to cause the destruction of periodontal disease. And the fifth one is it must demonstrate the virulence factor responsible for enabling these microorganisms to cause destruction of periodontal tissues. Virulence factors are nothing but molecules which helps these bacteria to get colonized and cause the destruction of periodontal tissues. So it should demonstrate virulence factor, then we can call it as a periodontal pathogen. So these are the five criteria Socrates' key put forward to name any group of bacteria or microorganisms as a periodontal pathogen. One is the increased number at diseased sites should be eliminated after treatment. It must demonstrate a host response and it must cause disease in experimental animal and it must demonstrate virulence factor. That's all for now. I hope you understood the very small concept just like the course postlates how a bacteria or a group of microorganism is to be named as periodontal pathogen. So I'll come up with a new topic in periodontics. Thank you. And lastly guys, we have started channel membership in the industry and more channel. So you can explore various exclusives for the channel members. So you can explore various options by clicking on the join button adjacent to subscribe button. So we have options of personal WhatsApp help. So you can ask any doubts. You will get answered through WhatsApp text messages or voice messages. And we have one more option that is the PDF notes will be available. But as of now we have only the public health industry topic. The more topics will be uploaded soon. And the last option is one to one interaction session. You will get the personal interaction or personal classes on various subjects from the faculties of respective branches. So explore the join button and let us know if you want any further help from us. Thank you.