I am kind of flattered that so many of you came at this time of night to hear about politics. Just very quickly to introduce ourselves, my name is Lucy Chambers. This is... Tony Budden. You can do yourself. And we're going to talk to you today a little bit about a project that we've been working on. Tony for a very long time in various guises. Me since about June, sorry, earlier May this year, to try and get huge amounts of political data into wiki data, specifically about national level politicians. Hopefully though, while we start talking about politicians, this talk should be relevant and useful to people looking for tools to promote kind of data quality, consistency, things like that. Because a lot of the tools which we're going to talk about in this presentation are hopefully much more generally applicable. So yeah, it starts a bit politic specific, but then you'll get to see lots of other things on which we would love your feedback. Because a lot of these things, this is the first time that people are really actually seeing them and they've only just been finished. So we would love a load of people to try them out very soon now. So very quickly, just to give a quick lie of the land, when Tony started working on this a long time ago, I think there was an assumption that there was a lot more data available in the world about who politicians are in individual countries. It's actually kind of shocking what is available, or more specifically not available about which politicians, who actually represents the people in individual countries. So that actually means that answering even really basic questions, like this was actually published last week I think by Spiegel online, really basic questions like what is the gender breakdown of houses of parliament around the world, how representative are people's governments, even questions like that are incredibly hard to answer at the moment and that is pretty much one of the most basic types of data. We're hoping, so aim one of a project like this is to make sure that we can answer questions like this. But going forward, obviously we're interested in more interesting things like how did people vote based on whether they were representative or not of the people that they were representing. Sorry, it's late. So yeah, just things like this that Spiegel online are doing actually take a huge amount of effort at the moment and this is the type of thing that we think should be easily answerable within a Wikidata context within a matter of minutes. Sorry PhD students, like we think that the vision of Wikidata is to put you guys out of a job or at least to make sure that you don't have to spend three years collecting data for your PhD thesis because a lot of these things should be able to be built collaboratively and used a lot faster. So I'm going to hand over to Tony to tell you just very quickly some of the specific problems that we faced about political data. So I think a lot of people assume that one of the reasons that Wikidata doesn't have lots of this is because the world is a complex and messy place and every country does this differently so it's hard to model in a sensible way etc. I actually don't think that's that true. Most of the core underlying concepts are generally the same everywhere and we have all the right properties and qualifiers to say someone is a member of a certain legislature representing a certain area as a member of a certain political party or group, start dates, end dates, legislative terms, things like that. I actually think having been wrestling with this sort of data for several years now that actually one of the reasons that Wikidata isn't as advanced in this area as in lots of others is that the power user tools don't work well with political data. It's relatively easy to put a lot of this data in by hand but we all know that the kind of dirty secret of Wikidata is that actually loads of this stuff is put in by bots or by sort of mass imports with quick statements and things like that. But most of those tools don't work well because political data is slightly different. Most of the important information is in qualifiers. People hold the same political position more than once so someone can be president for a while, leave office, come back for a second time. Quick statements for example can't cope with that. It adds all the qualifiers from the second one on to the first one. Legislative office people hold way more times and they can be re-elected six, seven, eight, twenty, thirty times. So a lot of the people who have tried to put a lot of this data in go to these tools discover that they didn't really work very well and are like I'm not going to sit and type this all in, that'll take me years. So actually we've ended up having to rewrite a lot of these tools to cope much better with political data which is a lot of what we're doing to see. Can I just get a quick feel? Can you just put your hand up if you have used quick statements before? About half of the people. Okay, so that just gives you an anchor for how much you should go into detail there. And I'm just going to talk about how we started because I think this gets into the nitty-gritty of some of the problems. One of the other things which obviously isn't unique to political data but it's kind of, it obviously throws some, sorry I've got German words in my head, some little barriers in the way is that we need to find some kind of way to make entering stuff into WikiData accessible for people who are domain experts but who aren't necessarily familiar with WikiData. And some things we've had a huge amount of success about, things which are for example relatively general knowledge. I think we ran at what we called a mission early on in the project and a mission we defined as essentially setting people a challenge, getting people to enter data into WikiData. And the topic was help us to find all of the heads of government in the world and we walked people through all of the different steps that they would need in order to put that data into WikiData. And that was incredibly successful. We ran kind of a staggered challenge, there were five steps to it and each of them were done within about two hours, which was much more successful than we thought it was going to be. We then attempted to repeat that with slightly more abstract concepts such as, okay so tell us how many seats each of your houses has, your upper house and your lower house. Surprisingly not quite as much interest and I think that that kind of reflects a bit some of the different levels that we need to tap into, things that are kind of general, well my theory on why it was more successful, things which are more general knowledge, high profile politicians, people are very happy to enter that stuff, but more nerdy things which get into the nitty gritty of how to actually model things, missions weren't quite so successful for. So I'm going to hand back over to Tony to talk about country pages. So what came down to doing things at an individual country level, we didn't think it was as easy to replicate what we did with missions because we'd have to run like 200 of them in parallel all the time, which is outside our ability. But we discovered that one of the big problems that people face is even knowing what the quality of information is like in their country. We've gone through a variety of different ways of teasing that out and this we've largely inspired by the way some of European things works. So they've got a really nice model of you go in in a country where you just quite easily slot in here is an art gallery in the country and it instantly gives you a whole series of questions to see what paintings, what you did already knows are located there and lots of things about it. So we seamlessly stole lots of the ideas from that and basically for a country you can just set up for each house of your national parliament or even all your regional ones and you actually go forward to one. And it's really simple. You literally just drop in a single row that says what the item is for the legislature and what the item is for being a member of that legislature. And if you go back... Oh sorry, go back. Spoiled it. You get this kind of row and we're still experimenting with how many things we can fit in here because we've lots more that we'll show but it gives you lots of really basic queries that let you see things like... Every constituency that's currently set on being a member of that or a list of all the members it gives you two lists, one of the ones for the current members and one of the ones for all the members ever. So that seems like it should get you loads of results but in lots of places it gets you a very small number of results because even though the people exist nobody's ever set up the P39 position held statement of being a member. We also do ones for looking for gaps in data. So this is a report that finds all the people who have been a member who we don't have a given name filled in for and sort of it sets you up. I think there's probably about ten or a dozen queries like that that it just gives you out of the box that you can go through and kind of look for gaps without doing anything more than dropping in those two identifiers. But what we really want everybody to do is actually set up reports for these things rather than just running queries. Because what we find is that if you turn the sparkle query into a report, how many of you have played with Listeria? Is this a meaningful thing? Yep, so Listeria basically takes any sparkle query turns it into a table that you drop in on the page. That has several really good advantages. One is that you can add it to your watch list. So then when the data changes underneath you actually find out so somebody comes in and accidentally deletes something or changes something or a core modeling thing changes. If it's just a sparkle query that every now and again you come and run it might take you a long time to notice. This way you get to see every day or however often you look at these things. The other really useful thing that lots of people it seems don't know about is WD edit. How many people here have played with that on Listeria? Yeah, considerably less. Two people. So this is built in in Listeria. If you say WD edit equals true in the config of it you get the same table but when you hover over cells you get a little add button where you can type straight into the cell which is on the next slide. It pops up at a new value with the dropped on and instead of having to go to the item page and work out how to do the addition so particularly add events and hackathons and things like this it's a much lower barrier to entry to people to go to a list of go fill in all these people's birth places or giving them more simple data like that. So again turning your sparkle queries into structured tables actually has loads and loads of really good advantages. I wish you could film from this side people's faces. That was great. Excellent. Okay so the other much more complex one that we did was so reports are really good at showing you what data exists but obviously what they can do is show you what data doesn't exist. So because we've been working with political data for a long time before we were doing all the wiki data stuff we've built like an army of I think we've about 1200 scrapers now that go out and sort of scrape every parliamentary website in the world and lots of third party sites and we've basically built up loads of external sources of data so what we want to be able to do is compare those to wiki data. So we built a tool that you give it a sparkle so you give it a URL to an external CSV file and then you make a sparkle query that you expect to give you the same results that are in that CSV file and then it basically shows you the differences between them. So we did one for the members of whether that's the senate or the lower house in Argentina and we discovered there was loads of really good data except none of them had the feel to say what political group they were in. Wiki data group here is political group. So it's basically showing you the diffs if the two are the same it just shows you them in one but if there's a different that splits them in two shows you what it got back from sparkle what it got from the CSV. So you can see diffs quite simply. So we discovered well none of these have these groups okay so we need to get that in. So then we have a slight digression of how on earth do you get all that data in. As I already said quick statements doesn't really help. A it doesn't really work very well with information like being a member like this because someone will be a member for multiple terms and it'll put it on the wrong one and B it's not really very good at just adding a qualifier to something rather than creating a whole new statement. So we ended up having to write essentially a replica which we call position statements which works much much better with position held statements and instead of trying to be clever and attach everything to the existing statement it just creates new ones every time. So the input format is identical. So anything that you would have been able to fit to pass to quick statements but quick statements doesn't work with you can pass to position statements and it'll hopefully do the right thing. So then we can go through all the things in and suddenly yep yep go ahead. So the new result from the comparison shows us that the only difference is that WikiData believes someone is in a different party to what the official website scraper says they're in. So that's perfect that's exactly what you want to know. You're never going to discover something like this within WikiData unless that's knowledge you have it's not going to trigger any constraint report it's never going to come up empty with the wrong information. But if you can compare to an external source the external source might be wrong we've discovered way too many official parliament websites aren't actually up to date so we don't want to do anything fancy and automated to keep these up to date we want a human to resolve this but it's a tool that will actually show you that and it works even better if your external CSV file is one that refreshes regularly because it's from a web scraper or whatever and had this live for a day or two suddenly it changed to be this where the external source now has three new members and suddenly the watchlist notification triggers hey this has changed again and bam you can go ah three people that we need to go make sure they're actually real and add the data. So obviously you can do this for any kind of external source that you can get a CSV file from it works best if you have shared identifiers because then you can know that they're the same people rather than just diffing on names etc but it also works really well if you run it against Wikipedia pages for example because you can resolve the links that way etc and it's a really really nifty tool for making sure that information that changes doesn't get stale in Wikidata. I think that's a good point if people are looking for things to do that are very useful and you know that your government data catalogue or whatever has a unique identifier but there isn't a Wikidata ID for it please register one that makes things a hell of a lot easier we really want properties for the official member IDs of every legislature in the world there's only about twelve to fifteen of them at the minute I think we need a lot more it's one of the most useful things you can do and it doesn't take a huge amount of time okay so still me the other really interesting tool that we've talked about is Listeria but again it falls into the same trap of not coping with political data very well so if you wanted to get a list of all the prime ministers of your country again if someone has held that office more than once Listeria ignores all but the first one which actually is really annoying if you're trying to build a chronological history of that so again we built a replacement for it that copes with that again very simple very straightforward except if we're going to go to the trouble of having to write that anyway we might as well make it do more interesting things so it actually generates feedback on things that look wrong so as it goes down the list you can see on the first one there's an inconsistent predecessor on this so quite often it says this person was replaced by this one or follows this one etc so it looks for gaps omissions or those being out of sync with each other which again is very very difficult to see if you're just looking at a single item because unless you're a real expert on that field you're probably not going to notice that it says they replaced someone who actually they didn't who was two before or something but when you see them in a list like this and it highlights oh this doesn't match with this or you can see the date overlap there where one person says he continued until January 45 but the previous person says he started three months earlier than that it might be true occasionally you can have overlap in these things but actually it's much more likely that one of those is wrong again we can't know which one something needs to go and investigate that and discover that but again it's something you're never really going to notice looking at an individual item unless you're a complete expert on that person but seeing it in a list and going ha seems to be an overlap here that probably doesn't make sense usually all the things that we think need investigated in that list so any position that expected that only one person will ever have had at a time it's a really nice way both to see what data is there but also see what's probably wrong with it so the other big thing is people have no idea where they're starting from lots of people in lots of countries assume that the data is probably pretty good and actually unless you're in about four or five key countries all of whom are probably represented in this room by the key people who made the data good it's really really not but we need a really simple way of visualizing that so we built little simple progress bars for key things so on the qualifiers of being a member of it how many of them have started parliamentary group when they were elected things like that and the biographical data of the people and obviously you can customize that for each country the really neat thing about this is this is using Listeria as well those people think Listeria can only output tables but it really can't you can specify a row template for each thing that comes back so a sparkle query that gets each of these things then just calls the template as soon as there's a little progress bar so again this will be updated sort of every night and you get to see the progress in your country okay and just by way of illustration one of the things one of the things that we have been doing and again things that we would love to source from you in order to check how good the data is we were trying to do all kinds of random things where we knew the answers to particular questions and then just to show us what what wiki data could produce and if the if wiki data could produce the fun queries then we were pretty sure that it could produce the serious ones as well so here's just a couple of examples this is the first time that the UK Parliament had more women in it than people called John that was 1992 which is somewhat shameful and yeah so relatively yeah kind of indicative but useless query and this was a map of the UK for MPs born outside the UK or Ireland so you can see all kinds of things it's interesting this one because you can tweak it and most of the countries in the world don't have quite this distribution Finland I think most people were born in Finland but yeah it's just a silly thing I think Andrew did you do this one or was that Tony did this one anyway Andrew okay yeah anyway yeah we also we ran an event in London and there's an event page for that which actually isn't linked from here but there is thanks to Andrew who sat at the back a very interesting list of some might say trivial queries but very very interesting things including political dynasties including people who sorry parliamentarians that killed each other all kinds of things like that and so we're just trying to see like how descendants of slave owners things like that so just using those as a kind of lever to see okay if we know what the answer to these are how good is our data really so one of the interesting things about this as well is that once somebody has built this in one country ideally it's really trivial to run exactly the same query for any other country if we all standardize how we add this data part of the problem at the minute is different countries have put the data in a slightly different ways so the queries don't work the same way and one of the things we're trying to resolve by doing interesting queries like this these people are going to look at them go ooh how did I make that work for Germany oh I get no results is actually say ah but if we all agree on this all this stuff you get for or if we're consistent enough we don't have to all agree on everything sufficiently consistent great so just very quickly a couple of ways I think I can do this in a minute a couple of ways which you can get involved on so between November 20th and November 30th there is what is called Global Legislative Open Week and we are trying to run a series of events around the world to get people's data about legislators obviously better we have a small amount of funding so that we can support people if they are interested in running events in that week so if you are interested please get in touch there's details of how there the presentation is linked from the page or you can talk to us and it will be fun, there will be lots of people and lots of noise going around and Tony I think you should do this one as well so we basically there are three or four countries that have set up dedicated Wiki projects in most countries that's going to be overkill especially if there is only one person working on this data so we want there to be kind of mini ones like I said earlier shamelessly some of all paintings does it come along set up the report that I saw earlier that will generate lots of other reports that you can fill in just add your country to this list see what's there flesh it out over time and hopefully we can get lots of people adding lots of really good political data for the whole world Yay and then I guess the last thing I should say is that in this room after we wrap up we do have a Wiki data and politics meet up it's going to be very relaxed organizing it with us and we're just going to have some drinks try and work out what people are struggling with in individual countries whether we can help each other out I know it's late so it's going to be very lightweight and delightful yeah that's everything and yet we can I think get drinks from somewhere Thank you very much So we should also explicitly thank the Wiki Media Foundation for giving us a grant to provide us to build lots of these tools Thanks Wiki Media Foundation Yay


Hello and welcome to how to create a super simple bootloader part for I'm Bruno and I'll be your host for this video This time we're going to focus on developing the application code So we're gonna basically use the same content that we had created on the previous video of the bootloader as Again, it started off if we recall the message that appear was showing that the bootloader was started But there was no way up install So a very simple way to create your application is to use control C plus control V and Copy and paste from the bootloader and then apply a few changes to make the application works as we expected by adding Prints here and there and also changing the linker script So we can locate the flash position that the application is going to be running from all right, so let's get into the code itself So here we can see the bootloader and pressing control C and control V changing the project name to your application And once that is done the copy will be made One thing that is very important to detail is that the IOC file the one that used to create the first project You keep the same name as bootloader and we need to tie those two together by changing the name Meeting the same as the workspace itself. All right, so now that we have the code I'm just going to start cleaning everything starting from the main.c file So here on our code we are going to scroll down to the parts that we have to first remove In order to make the application works. So the first one that I'll remove is the go-to-wap and Some others such as the link function that we won't be using on the application at this point in time All right, we can also clean here the prototypes for those functions to avoid the warnings on the code and And finally we can go down to the main loop and instead of using the go-to-wap We can actually go and replace it with a printf just so we know that we are running the application So right now it's gonna be a very simple print just saying hey the app is running Now this should do the trick for the application side of things in terms of code execution But we also need to change the linker script So I'm going to enter on the dot LED file and make sure that the flash region is On the same position that I want it to be so I'll just change here to 8 and Also keep the length to 64k instead of 32 so I can use a larger portion of the flash for the application And the last thing is actually tell the application that the interrupt vector should be With an offset that meets the very first position of the flash So as we can remember from this linker script we added <IP_ADDRESS> as Deposition so those two are all set since they have the same position now I can build the application and enter in debug mode as the usual method But instead I'm gonna use the bootloader as the entry point So I'll tie those two binaries on the same debug session in here down below We can actually see that the ELF or the application does come with the three memory regions that we specified So now I'll just click on the bootloader Project to enter in the debug session, but since we copied it for the first time We're gonna see two bootloaders and that's not desirable So I'm gonna have to delete one and just use the other one All right, so by entering the debug configuration I can simply delete any one of those they are copy of each other and Once this is deleted I can configure the proper one So to do that we can again enter into the debug configuration But this time we can actually go to the start tab and through there We can add a different ELF so I can decide if I want to load two or more ELFs at the same time selecting the application project over the debug one and just hitting okay So we're gonna see that both are going to be presented and one is the main and the other one It's just part of the entire debug session Which is nice because we're going to enter through the bootloader and whenever that jumps into the application We can see and debug the code from the application as well as long as the two Projects are on the same workspace, which is very nice feature from the QBuyDE So as we can see I just entered in debug mode from the bootloader Here there's no surprise. I'm just going to enable the console so we can see the serial port And we can see that there's some message from the previous session that we were exploring on the third video Let's just ignore for the time being and one thing that's very interesting to do on before starting the debug session And the code execution is actually to go to show view and then go to the memory region Just to prove that the application was actually loaded on this process by using the combination of the two binaries So by typing the first address of the application itself We can see that there are some cold and I'm just scrolling down back and forth on the memory region So we know it's not blank and now finally, let's do the code execution and also show on the console Because we do expect to see the message from the bootloader and then finally go into the app running So there we have it the boot start app start and the app running on the cycle And a very interesting thing is that if we do pause here We can see that the code was executing from this main But this is not the main from the bootloader itself This is the main from our application and since both projects are combined into the same workspace We can actually check both codes at the same time with this methodology, which is quite nice for the QBID All right, I think this concludes the steps that I wanted to cover during this video Thanks for watching up until this point. I do hope to see you guys on the fifth video and Again, please check our wiki page for more content and also a github and as always have a wonderful day. Thank you guys


And so another branch of this fight begins and white beard is joined in the fight. We'll go back to the channel We have episodes 473 and 474 of our one piece watching today And yes white beard is joined in the fight after squad was tricked by a kind new into thinking that white beer was betraying Everybody white beer proved himself by not even punishing a squad for it But just recognizing that the Navy was just using I guess squads and securities against himself But now like I said another branch of this fight begins as white beer joins in I'm so high If you're new to channel, don't forget to drop a sub and let's hop into it You follow the slow motion Dude, and we don't even know like how he uses his double fruit in combat yet Like I guess I'm just like close quarters the only scene out like a crazy scale He's calling his shot he's I'm coming for you, baby. I'm coming for you Not a chance It's I just love the effect of his double fruit so much. It's like the area of effect around them The control center's gonna be freaking out in circle. Okay, so you started to raise this at the end of the last Wait the ice. Oh, it's blocking it. I'll keep you to phone.  I Was full too. I can't say anything Yeah, I have a bad feeling that's gonna have like long-lasting implications in terms of the fight too like that's gonna be a Bad one for white beard. You stabbed right through the chest. He just took it too Okay, stop crying get in there start fighting This is not the time Marco Comfort him That's what I'm saying, baby.  I just trap everyone in here. Come on white beard. Go I would say more than fight of these. He just stands there like nothing happened Now what's the plan once they trap them all in though?  Oh Wait, he's cracking the ice John Giants. Oh shoot. I'd be just staring at him Oh, here we go. Here we go Oh my gosh, wait, he actually lost his blade Is he warping him? Dude white beard is insane. He's like moving the planet. Oh my gosh It's nuts like tremors, but this is like shifting the tectonic blades Oh my He said he wasn't cheering for either side. Oh my god I see why white how white beard got to the point that he is that in the pirate world now It's not far enough Dude Jim Bay is just the like the real one this arc My gosh, how helpful can this fish man possibly be white beard might break the ice by shifting everything I See more like a rage a white beard like the visual of him of him like tearing. Oh my god. So cool It feels like the end of the world What happened Wait, is that the execution platform like it's destroyed or is that just like the base? Oh no, no the execution platform is behind This giant Giant He's just jumping at him Like how that is what I was wondering is how this affects him if he punches like that He's such an absurd amount of power. Yeah, are they gonna stop it? Yo sin Goku has to have some ace in the hole He literally did it just bounce off of them? What has he not shown? He has to have a devil for power I you don't become the flea admiral by just being like some regular schmiggler guy It wasn't garp for sure Oh All three of them together man god dang Jigachad yeah, we stand around for Yeah, I wonder why the ice is still blocking it. Yeah, what does it that kind who's just trying to melt? He's got freaking magma I just feel like it just twists and turns in every direction. It's so impossible to tell what happens next now Oh, no, someone's gonna smack him Oh, no, it's gonna cut loopy off Wait, yeah, there are holes in it. I feel like they will just all take posts and shoot at them It's literally a pit. Oh No Oh my gosh There's no way to get up that either. Can he can he use his double proof like shift them?  Yeah, he's literally died and he's still fighting Dude, what there's more to this. Oh no, he's gonna fill it with like magma. Oh, no Did his design is crazy though? Okay, no, it's gonna rain down Oh Shot they're gonna gain power on the way down.  Let's go He died Who is that? Yeah, I said they're all under the impression. Oh shoot. Oh, it's all the rookies Yeah, there's kid. Oh, yeah, they were all watching And that's all their perceptions now Oh, did they see through it? Okay, yeah, they all see past it They're not showing it. Yep. Yeah, it makes sense that they would see and he wasn't he x navy He's like those bastards are up to it again, but that's sick actually that they they recognize that it makes sense that they do Why is she crying? Whoa Amen brother. Amen Oh, yeah, Jean-Bard the newest member can he sense it? Dude the Reaper is meteor volcano. Oh my gosh talk that is crazy looking though. It's the scale of it It will melt everything too. We'll have no foothold stands there Got a sheer speed too. Oh no No, how are they supposed to get there? There's walls and just the sea now I wonder how differently this would be going down if the rookies had also gone to morning board Oh man People like burning alive and then the cannons. Oh, they're so outman now. I'll fire powered out everything And the kumas. Oh my god.  That is insane. Just pop back He's still launching them The entire ship you can't save it. This is all or nothing now. We'll be next down Oh my god, why is this actually not going to make it through this is he a beautiful ship, man And all it took was one admiral just like level their playing field I Mean we know how like saw in the connection the straw hats were with mary This has to be the same for white beard and mobi dick, dude We're really apologizing to they probably had one at what it was club batterman They probably had one of those on there too. I imagine the bond between them and that ship was just oh man Casket of the white beard pirate Oh All right, well we gotta make one big fat move somebody we need an ace in the hole pun intended No for real. Yeah, it's just a funnel somebody pick something to do He's leading the way Damn Oh my gosh I feel like luffy's what was it called conquerors hockey also has to come into play somehow because it's like really intensive emotions That brought it out originally Is luffy just gonna take like the Blood force and the damage And they all still charge in knowing it's a trap. Oh my god Yeah, the the forces are dwindling. So like there's like nobody left. Oh my god. It still seems so far Jesus Where's white beard? It's all burning him. Oh my god.  Where did buggy mr. Three even go? Somebody anything Is that warris? No way. Oh my god.  Let me guess who it is.  No shot. How is he even up?  Oh wait, what it's like staying in the air How does luffy even know the extent of what jimmy can do? Wait, what a move though.  Is that like the mask of the mobi dick? What is that? Oh my god He said jimbey throw my In Oh, man garb just must be terrified same as ace He's got gusto. I just want to see white beard booking it for them Oh No for real dude three admirals we'll be gonna need like a gear 10 bro Oh my god, he said i'm gonna hang on to this just to throw at them The trump card. Oh, what do we got? Oh, he needs to be like second gear at least I know he's gasped but still Dude these shots are so sick though. I can't man. I don't know what's gonna happen. I'm scared, but I'm so high man Oh my god Okay, okay, everybody take it easy white beard has a trump card. Thank goodness I knew he had to be like keeping something. He's like hidden still just like the navy has been But I feel like the navy still hasn't shown their entire hand either The luvia is just filled with this insane rage. We're so outmatched like realistically So insanely outmatched from my perspective. It's just the admirals themselves are so Ridiculously strong and not to mention like I said, the navy probably still has a lot of tricks hidden up their sleeve They're they have home field advantage, but now white beard is a charge in baby This is this is the climax of all of this the battlefield is gone And it's just a straight up brawl now But guys that's been it from those 473 and 474 for one piece watch through Do drop us up on the channel if you're new and I'll catch you in the next one peace peace


Hi everyone, back for a Life Monastery video. So today's reflection is that every moment is a moment of practice. And when I hear the term spiritual practice, I usually hear it used as, ah, yes, I pray in the morning, or I journal, or I meditate X number of minutes or hours a day, or I go to retreat, spiritual retreats on a regular basis, or I gather with spiritual people regularly, or I do certain movements or rituals that foster my spiritual growth. And those are all helpful for sure. Those are all sort of more intensive exercises for the soul. And yet, I've always thought that spiritual practice never ceases, or rather it doesn't ever have to end, like, okay, I'm done meditating now, it's time to go on with my day. Alright, I think that's my prayer for the day, that's my journaling for the day, that's my dancing for the day, or whatever. Okay, well, what about the rest of your day? Are you now going to no longer be practicing your spirituality? And yes, I understand there is something to be said about, well, it's hard to multitask George, it's hard to be working, and at the same time practicing my spirituality. Exactly. And I think that's why we are here, in my opinion, in my worldview, in my understanding of the meaning of life. I think that's why we're here, to anchor the light in as many moments as possible. To ground the love, or maybe I should better say anchor the love and ground the light, however you want to say it, in as many moments as possible. To hold the divine, to represent God in as many moments as possible. I heard, I've been once again listening to a lot of near-death experiences, I really value them, and I highly encourage you to check out my playlist on remarkable NDE's. I'll try to remember to put a link below this video, if I don't, please remind me. And one of them said, imagine that God couldn't be here today.  God sent you instead, couldn't be here. So God has sent you, and that's like such a good way of thinking about it. Like you and I are quite literally the representatives, or the embodiments of God, or the divine, or the universe, or highest, deepest source consciousness.  You are the God, God-ness that's walking around and doing stuff. And when other people see you, and interact with you, do they walk away going, wow, I just interacted with the divine, with an angel, with ultimate light and love in body form. I wish for that, I yearn for that, I am practicing what that even means, in, you know, of course the tiniest way that I can, but it's a good thought. And the other, another idea that I heard recently was how, this is again part of a near-death-experience vision, that they saw this rock dropping from the sky into an ocean, and the rock created ripples that went forever and ever and ever touch the entire ocean. And then the divine said, you are that rock, this is a separate near-death experience, separate person who said this, you are that rock, you have been sent out into this world, and you are creating ripples. And that brings me back to, again, the core message of this video. Every moment is a moment of practice. Every moment is a ripple effect moment.  The question is, what kind of ripple effect are you creating? The ripple effect, you know, is in your own mind, every thought that you allow to stay for more than a couple seconds, sure, thoughts come in randomly. We might say it's our monkey mind. You might say, some of us might say it's spiritual entities influencing us. Some might say it's just the brain, you know, secretions of hormones and electric signals, electrical signals in the brain and media influences and, you know, past conditioning. Your thoughts, sure, they come randomly. But whether you choose to allow them to stay once you become aware of them is what creates the ripple effect. If you choose to allow this thought of somebody, something negative about that person, and you become aware of that and you choose to indulge in that, that creates a ripple effect. Maybe the next time you interact with that person, that ripple effect will be there. No matter how nice you try to be with that person, you still have that judgment that will create a subtle difference in your face, facial expression, in your tone of voice, in the words that you use, that they will subtly recognize. And so that's true, right, that's a scientific fact of how our thoughts affect the subtleties of our interactions with others. But might there also be some kind of spiritual vibration of our thoughts when we judge somebody, when we are, you know, when we, oh yeah, that person is always like this, or that person, yeah, why, you know, that person, I don't like that person because of this reason. Might that spiritual vibration be actually holding them down in some way energetically according to another NDE that I watched, that I listened to, it's true, that our thoughts, our positive and negative thoughts actually weigh down other people or lift them up, even without interacting with them physically. There's some kind of spiritual vibration thing going on that actually creates an energetic uplift or energetic downward energy. And then of course our thoughts of ourselves, the ultimate person we have thoughts about all the time either definitely creates it because we're in, you know, where our thoughts are happening within our own body-mind system, it's going to definitely create an uplift or downward trend. And so spiritual practice never ceases.  Spiritual practice never ceases. So I look at like a lot of therapies, like people go to therapy, you know, maybe even get coaching, and those therapists and coaches don't tell them, you've got to practice throughout the day, you can't just come to me once a week or once every two weeks or whatever, like going to church once a week and then going home and, you know, being mean to your family or whatever, right? Too many people do that. No, no, no. You have to practice throughout the day, like literally throughout the entire day. Not just, yeah, no, no, I have my morning practice, I have my eating practice. Oh, I say grace during lunch, okay, fine, wonderful, good to have those mile markers throughout the day. But no, it's like at 10, 22 a.m., are you practicing? At 4.13 p.m., are you practicing? Not that you have to like definitely don't beat yourself up, you're like, oh my God, I haven't practiced in six hours, no, it's not like that, but it's, that's the goal. I mean, it's a very high goal. It's a very high, yeah, it's like being an Olympic athlete, yeah, we're working our way there. But all of us have been sent here as spiritual Olympic athletes, again, from some other wisdom from NDE. It's like all of us are like elite jet fighter pilots sent here to this very difficult life as spiritual beings. They're all cheering us on. Like, yeah, you're going to go play Earth? That's a really hard game to play. Are you sure? You're going to go play Earth? All right. I'm cheering you on. We're all cheering you on here. We're going to be watching the whole time. And so we're here to play Earth. Earth school, Earth life, and the goal is to spiritually practice every single second of the day. Now, that's multitasking. It's true. There's, you know, people say, oh, multitasking is bad. There's one thing multitasking is good for spiritual practice. Like every second I'm working on my computer, I suddenly become aware, okay, I haven't thought about spirituality or God or the divine or my breath or my spiritual life for usually these days I do my energy reboot like several times an hour. So I'm starting to work my way, starting to work my way there. So I'm like, oh my gosh, I haven't thought about my spirituality, my spirit in like half an hour. Okay, energy reboot. All right, now set the intention again is every stroke of the keyboard, every word, every moving around this paper, every, every, you know, oh, put my phone over here. Every movement, every breath, every sight, can I somehow multitask the only multitasking that's truly worthwhile to bring, to breathe spirit into that moment, that activity, to bring awareness to my thought, is it rippling effect good, or probably rippling effect not so good. This video has gone long enough. Thank you for joining me in this experience. I hope this has been helpful. I hope this inspires you to practice without ceasing. Thank you.


Going on everyone Sam here with late sports cards from in 22 23 penini flux basketball Hobby 4 box break number 2 random team style to look again at your random results as always find those on the website under the results tab as Well as the link in chat Good luck here. Everybody. Let's do it. All right 26 Cardinals Packers Cardinals bangles Packers Raiders Saints Jets Bucks Commanders 8 to go in Penini black number at 26 and black number 26 flawless also at 7 to go 7 to go on flawless Falcons Raiders Viking Saints Steelers Niners Titans 7 to go in flawless all marked down Good luck. Let's do some flocks. Here we go. Cory Seeger the MVP. Love it. Is that a second World Series MVP? Is it really did he win he won he must have won it with the Dodgers? Trey Jones silver DFS and Benedict Matherin 275 Evan Mowley for the Yeah, 2020. That's what I thought Jake Red Deandre Eton influx Malachi random Really him and Reggie only position players with two. Wow bones. Highland silver. That's kind of insane My favorite break Museum baseball or triple threads baseball Jalen McDaniels Keegan Mary I really have been enjoying tier one as well. So your ones right up my alley of randomness Okay, the Williams Bryce McGowan's to 49 on the rookie Johnny Davis Nemhar Tyrese Maxi to 49 for the Sixers blue boy on McDonough. It's 299 for the Pistons Pary Eason influx Tyrese Maxi and blue Jalen McDaniels if Seeger keeps it up. He's on like Hall of Fame face now Because that's like two World Series MVPs is pretty legit. Yeah Pat Conniton nice one there on the equinox Brats on that one drew our with commanders sold out on 25 Kenneth with some spots tomorrow sold out on 25 everybody silver Caleb Houston. Thank you drew appreciate that buddy sold out on number 25 Jalen how you doing silver Jalen McDaniels and Damian Miller Box two of flux be able to go right into that one next everyone right into that one next blue Ogie and none of me to 99 James P With a division spot in NT. Thank you, buddy That's either tomorrow or Friday. I'm not sure maybe Saturday silver hero and Tyrese Albert Trayman and John Merant Well, it's down to seven everybody seven ago on flawless Silver Caruso and rookie influx Marjan Bochamp. That is a John Collins to 49 and rookie influx Jaden Ivy Tray young and rookie influx AJ Griffin red IQ And Paolo Seven ago flawless PYT number seven everybody or not number seven, but seven ago on flawless PYT KD silver Jason Tatum We got a gold Demontissa bonus for the Kings nice one there Congrats Sacramento. That's kind of nasty Five of ten and Marjan Bochamp That is gonna be Davion Mitchell's second year auto for the Kings Kings did well in that box Congrats Sacramento John M mark William Silver and fluid AI Now I know just go out and play now and you you know you were there to see if you ever get back there It's not as much pressure He's done it like you said Devon to sell Jaden Ivy Blue Evan Mobley to 99 going for that rainbow for the cats and Katie Silver Kelly Ubre and Jeremy Sohan RJ Barrett to 25 nice one there for the Nick's silver Chris Paul flow motion silver market spot and Jabari Smith, Jr. Random silver Stephen Adams flow motion Kyrie J. Nivey silver D'Angelo Russell and Steph Curry George McGinnis for the Pacers nice little throwback hit there congrats, Indiana Greg I'm picking up the Raiders and flawless. Thank you Greg. We're down to six six to go on flawless Everybody Jake Larabia silver rookie influx of Patrick Baldwin Six to go on flawless Let's go man Malik Monk to 99 for the Kings and D. Wade Chris Middleton red Jaden Ivy And that really didn't honestly All right six to go on flawless eight to go on black Number six no seven ago one two three four five six seven to go on Pineda black seven and six Silver AJ Griffin steel a draft AJ Griffin Jaden Hardy Tyler hero to 75 So by Aaron Nessmith Benedict's math or an incoming Zion Silver look like trout in this hat. Thank you. Thank you Sam Sam, man Bill Walton nice one there. Oh, there's two autos in this Bill Walton and Herbert Jones. There you go Blazers and Pelicans Who's that? No Now that is that is it right? KP and LeBron James leaving so Drunk words are sober thoughts. So Even then I'd still look like Mike trout 49 is Kelly Ubre silver Lamella ball I'm gonna go around telling people that somebody called me Mike trout now Sam Alex Caruso and Jalen Yeah, I was gonna be like, yeah, okay Silver come on Harris and base last pack of the break everybody Uh jade and ivy blue Julius Randall 299 and a base jambore quick recap here everybody We had Bill Walton, Herbert Jones, George McGinnis Davion Mitchell and Pat Conniton So for the break everybody that uh Thanks again for the fill up next Panini black


Welcome back, folks. Dow. Dow right now trading up 222, we get the Nasdaq up 137, S&P's up 39.5. Let's go over to our man, Mr. Basel Chapman, as we do each and every Tuesday at 20 past the hour. And don't forget, folks, Basel has an outstanding show here every trading day, 12 to 1 Eastern standard time. Also, there's a great newsletter. Now the way you get the newsletter, folks, you can go over to our website at TFNN. You're going to the newsletters, you're going to see the opening call right on the top right-hand corner. You just hit subscribe. You can get the opening call for $128 for one month, $5.95 for six months, which is a savings of $173 or 22%. A year at $995, which is a savings of $541, are 35%. They all come with a 30-day money-back guarantee, folks, everything to gain is zero to lose. Basel Chapman, what's going on? Hi, Tom. How are you? Doing great, man. Yourself? I'm very good. Good. Good. Welcome back. Thank you very much. Is this our first interview since you've been back? Might be, huh? Yes. It's close. We've been away two weeks. Nice. I got back and then Friday I did the show. Just over a week ago, while I was there in the Cine Australia, 16 hours ahead is really confusing. Yeah. Pretty cool. But I'm going to do my newsletter every day. There's one day where I was absolutely confused whether it was Monday or Tuesday. I heard that on your first show. That was pretty cool. Yeah. Right. What is interesting is that there was a high on the down, I'm showing you the down chart right now. Okay. Well, first of all, I should say that while I was there, nothing was mentioned in the conversations I had with the few people that I met, Australians, about stocks or anything like that. A couple of people mentioned that the market was at highs and they just went on to something else. From there, there was this quietness about celebrating new all-time highs that I've just never seen this before when you get major highs where people just aren't talking about it. They're not talking about stocks that they made a fortune on last week or anything like that. So that to me was very important. But while I was there, I kept looking at the charts and I said, wow, the peak that I had identified for subscribers to my opening call back on the 27th of November at 20,174, and we went short of, I think about seven points from the top. It looked great. And then it plunges down to 27,325. And then it was a doji candle and a gap up day, the following day. And then we started this big move to the upside, but I was looking at the charts and the pattern looked exactly the same. So we were very fortunate with the day of the top 109,373 on the 17th. We were able to see the opening, the next day to short the market. So we are short the Dow, but we still have all our long positions because I'm not sure everything's done yet and I'll explain why in a minute. But the patterns look exactly the same. We've got a peak G, it's very unusual in the Chapman wave, not to go to a DE or F. It went to the seventh highest peak, which is G. And we did exactly the same thing on the 17th, and not only that, the S&P did the same thing. We've got quite a few indexes that are Gs. That's very unusual. And then we plunged to yesterday's low. So the pattern, you can see, maybe I'll make this a little bit bigger. I'd say you can see it better there. So I'll expand that. Now you can see it. So the pattern with a gap down very much matches the low that went to December the 3rd. The difference here is that, although the MACD and Stochastic did turn down, the unbalanced volume was not yet at highs. It was still climbing. This time what we've got, that's the blue line. This time the unbalanced volume was right at the peak. It turned down and we've got that gap. We've got a doji candle yesterday after the gap and a nice move up today. But this is going to be very important. If we match the same thing, we've got apples, earnings coming out in less than an hour. A lot of things are going on with the United Technologies. I thought the earnings were coming out after the bell, but it might have come out this morning because they gap down and then they ran quite nicely with triple M stock. I watched very closely as gap downs were looking very poor. So this is going to be very important because if the Dow's able, we're at 28,780 right now. This is 35 minutes before the closing bell. And if there's another big move up tomorrow, yes, we could be matching the very same thing. And the only reason why I mentioned that and I'm not totally convinced that this is a top of significance rather than a short-term top is that that volatility index. And I'm just going to jump to the volatility index right now. Look how it screamed to 19.02 in just in a matter of two days. It went from the 13s to the 19s. And the market was just what the Dow's only about 6,700 points of its all-time high. To me, that I said to subscribers to my opening call, that was a little too much too quickly. So I don't know how this will play out because if I look at so many stocks, so many of them that are very important to the market are at peaks right now that essentially could be at least short to intermediate to maybe four to six week tops. So this is going to be how we deal with the coming few days is going to be very important. And there's no question about it. If we close under yesterday's low in the Dow of 28,649, I believe we've made not just a short-term top, but one that will affect the weekly charts as well and it could last a little longer. So that's kind of the patterns are matching, but two or three of the indicators that I'm looking at, and I want you to show you this because I've shown you this for weeks and weeks. You know how I've spoken about the nine period moving average above the black, this is the green line, above the black 14 period moving average. And that when we got the sell-off back in November to the December low, the 90 year may held just above that black line of the green, and it never turned, it turns pink when it crosses negative, it never turned pink. So to me, that's going to be very important. If in the next few days you start to see that nine period moving down, it's not a timing issue, it is a trend issue. So if that turns pink, it means that we've now on a shorter turn down to the sell mode, and that'll be the Dow. You'll see, I just wanted to show you something else quickly while we're here. Look, the S&P is a little bit higher, so it's going to have to do a little bit more work to turn down sharply, SBX.x, let me get that. You can see that green line is a little bit above, so it isn't as close, and the QQQ, and that's the reason why I think you mentioned it before, Apple is so important here. Look, the QQQ and the X100, Apple's a big part of that. Well, Apple's also a big part of the Dow. Look, it's holding very nicely so far. So I know the parameters to look at and just make it real simple. If in the next few days, the indices close under yesterday's lows, that's going to be very important to suggest. It's not the virus issue right now. It is really, at this particular moment, the market is somewhat vulnerable as I see it, to some kind of downturn. If you look at Apple, there it is, same thing. The MACDs turned down, stochastics under 80%. The nine period is above the 14 period, and that's really what's holding it up here. So this is going to be very important for me, because I haven't really been wanting to grab a lot of shorts because the fact is, we've gone to this level twice already. It wasn't just the November one, it was the time before, where you pull back a few percent, bam, next thing you know, you're at highs. So we've got to be careful, yeah. Yeah, I got one more thing that's applicable for you, Basil, with the Chapman wave. Now this is sad, folks, but the bottom line is that Cuba just had a 7.7 earthquake, and they're evacuating Miami offices right now for a tsunami. Really? Oh, that's terrible. Yeah, not good. Folks, come over to our website, it's TFNN, go to newsletters, the opening call, you can check it out right now. Basil, have a great one, a safe one.