Hi, this is the Vermont House of Transportation Committee. Maybe we'll skip introductions today, OK? And I'll skip my own. And so we are here only to take up a section of S114, which is a Senate bill which just got sent to the Judiciary Committee in the House. It's passed the Senate now in the House Judiciary Committee. That committee has been looking at an amendment that would change something in Title 23 on DUI suspensions, license suspensions. And we did talk about this a little bit yesterday when Representative Barbara Murphy questioned the commissioner of EMV about it. And people have been working until late last night on possible language. And maybe I should go right to, again, we have Mike Smith, right? And that means we have the commissioner also, Mike? Yes, it does. OK. Maybe you can identify yourselves. And before you start, what I have just heard is that Judiciary will not be offering the amendment at all. So if you guys know about that, maybe you could report to us on what you know about that. Well, Kurt, before you start, did you get the same text message from Mitzi at 1156 this morning? OK. That they were thinking of striking that section? Yes. And if they do, that would certainly make me happy. And I think Barbara and I think who else said something yesterday, Tim? And I think Brian did, just as we were breaking up. But I believe that that's what's going to happen. So Patty, do you know any more than that? Well, I don't know if you're on this text message or not, but it says, House Judiciary is going to amend the bill by striking the controversial section. Judge Grierson is good with that approach, even though getting his bill will take a smidge longer. DMV should be happy. I'm hoping we can now get back to suspending rules and getting this to the Senate. Yep. Well, did everybody see the communication, the email from Commissioner Manoli and Anthea this morning? Mike. What they would be striking is section 5-3. Is that right? I actually don't know, but it was the section of our concern. Barbara, was there only one section of Title 23? It is the section that was just speaking to 5-3 of this bill. But I didn't receive the text that you and Patty have spoken of. So I'm not completely clear on what you think the current action is, if that's relevant. I actually did not receive it either. Mitzi called me right as we adjourned. But I think she almost regretted that I had made the announcement that we were meeting, thinking that maybe even that wasn't necessary. But I was thinking, I think what I would like to see is our committee to take a position on that, whether it's offered or not, in case it is. And it is section 5-3, Mike. And 5-3 only, Patty? Yes, from S-114. Yep. OK. Barbara's not in agreement? OK. So I don't know if we need to take any testimony other than to. Well, why don't we? Oh, and now I don't have the commissioner, but I have Michelle. Yes, you do. The commissioner is with Mike Smith. Yeah, I don't see Mike Smith, but oh, they're in person. OK. OK. Why don't we take your testimony, please? Continue where you left off yesterday, Commissioner Minowley, if you would. Good afternoon, Commissioner Wanda Minowley, Vermont Department of Motor Vehicle. I did. I think the testimony. So first of all, I want to thank you for the opportunity to discuss, to have had the opportunity yesterday to discuss this section. I did respond. And Thea forwarded to me a possible amendment that was considered in House judiciary. I did respond to and Thea, which I said that the proposed language addressed our testimony regarding DUI threes and fours. I also offered some information regarding DUI ones and that offenders that these offenders have a choice to request a hearing, which holds a suspension in abeyance now, or to begin the suspension and serve their time for the suspended time, which is 90 days. Some individuals prefer not to challenge their DUI will and begin the suspension immediately to get the 90 days over. I offered that the proposed language that the House judiciary was considering would eliminate that option. In addition, some of the individuals with DUI ones choose to participate in the ignition interlock program, even though they're not required to, because that allows them to continue driving during their 90 day suspension and there's no interruption. Regarding DUI number two suspensions, those are effective on the 11th day and it's an 18 month suspension. But we also have individuals that choose not to go to hearing and they immediately enroll in the ignition interlock program and their 18 month suspension when the interlock begins effective on the 11th day and that the proposed language would also eliminate this option. I also did state that we understand this as a legislative policy that you're considering regarding DUIs and that the Department of Motor Vehicle will state that we do not believe this is in the best interest of public safety. And again, I thank you for the opportunity to comment on this language. And I think I can answer any questions that you have. I do have my team available if you wanna get into any specifics of how we process this. And I will stop at that. You're muted, Kurt. Kurt, you're muted. I have to say that I just heard from judiciary and they voted that 803. Did you get my text? I did, thank you. Okay. So did everybody hear what Heidi just said? Judiciary voted I guess eight to three to strike that section that they were. Start work is done. See you at one. Anthea? I was just, so for the record, I'm sorry, I missed the opening, Anthea Dexter Cooper Office of Legislative Council, just echoing what Representative McCoy just said. I was over at House Judiciary. It's much easier to switch committee rooms when it's just opening a new Zoom screen. I can put up the amendment. It's just very straightforward instead of it having all of the language that's currently in section five subdivision three, there would just be the bracketed, deleted. I also, if the committee is, and I apologize for missing at the beginning of Commissioner Manoli's testimony, I think it's probably consistent with what she had put in her email in response to an earlier version. I have what I think would be a simple fix to make it so that individuals who choose to serve their suspension or choose to avail themselves of the Ignition Interlock Program would be able to do that. If at some point the House chooses to move forward language in lieu of what they're deleting now with House Judiciary's proposed amendment. I'm happy to walk through that with the committee if they would like me to do that now or if that's something they want to take up later. I'd like to ask the commissioner if she thinks that is something we should try to do now or can that wait? So I guess I would, what I understood and I could have misheard is that House Judiciary has stricken that section five, three in its entirety. So my concerns regarding DUIs is no longer an issue. Is that correct? Oh, that is correct. They have struck that subdivision. They did not take up whether or not they're going to move forward a committee bill on the same topic at a later date. But I think that is still something that's outstanding. So chair McCormick, I think your question is would I, do I have comments on the potential language that Anthea just said she could work with you on if you wanted an alternative to this language being stricken? Is that correct? Yes. Again, my position is I think in the best interests of public safety, we should leave DUIs as the statute authorizes now. Very good, thank you. You're welcome. Any other questions for the commissioner or for Anthea? And Anthea, your hand is still up. Did you want to say something else? No, I'm sorry. Mr. Chair, I concur with the commissioner's views. Okay, any other questions for the commissioner? Okay, it looks like I've got representative Murphy and then representative McCoy. Thank you. I really appreciate this and I am curious, there was language that went quickly around a few of us as an amendment, which would be a separate bill. I appreciate that it's not going to be submitted after passing language that we don't like, but I just am curious if that bill is still coming out rapidly and if so, whether we will now actually get to see it before it hits prime time. Are you asking me? Either you or maybe Anthea, if she has a clue what judiciary was doing with language that was drafted as an amendment regarding the 21 day. Yep. To let others know what Barbara's referring to, there was language that went around late last night. It was sent to, I believe, Tim Cochran and Barbara and me. Barbara knows a better decent hour, so she didn't come in until early this morning. I commented last night, of course. And we both agreed, well, I guess it was a compromise. Commissioner, I don't know if you saw it, Anthea, I don't know if you were actually the one that drafted it, but I guess the old language said, when I say old language, I mean, as proposed or as considered by the Judiciary Committee, because I think this all starts in the House Judiciary Committee. I believe it would not allow the commissioner to suspend a license for offenses that were, was it two or three or four offenses? And I thought that that might be agreeable if it was one offense, the first offense, that that would, when a suspension might be in order under present law, that that would not be allowed. The commissioner could not do that. Unless there were two or more offenses. That was my opinion looking at it. I know Barbara, when she had a chance to look at it, agree with me, Tim. I didn't hear from you. And that's what Barbara is referring to. So I think I've got Anthea and then Patty. So to answer Representative Murphy's question, the only clue I can provide is that House Judiciary did not take up, and because they are not amending S114, or proposing to amend S114, aside from striking the one subdivision, this would probably need to be included in another bill or introduced as a standalone committee bill. House Judiciary did not take that up while I was in their committee. I don't think they're doing it now. In my absence, the impression I got was that they were just getting through S114 today to provide sort of a summary of the language, which I can certainly share with the committee. It had basically maintaining the status quo, which would be requiring the hearings under the statutory timeframes of 21 and 42 days and having a prohibition, sorry, requiring the hearings in the 21 and 42 days and having the suspensions automatically happen at the 11th day for the third and subsequent DUIs, where that's a change from current statute is for the second DUI, currently there is required to be a suspension at the 11th day and then the hearings at the 21 and 42 day mark as well. So what that language would have done was required the judiciary to hold the hearings and have the suspensions maintained as required under current statute for the third and subsequent, but basically having a moratorium on the statutory timeframe requirements for the hearings for the second DUI and having the commissioner not suspend for the second DUI. One of the things that commissioner Manoli brought up in her written comments on this was that that prevented individuals who might choose to serve their suspension for the second or subsequent DUI or the first or subsequent DUI who choose not to request a hearing, they wouldn't then be able to serve their suspension immediately and they wouldn't be able to serve their suspension and get an ignition interlock device. I have language that no one on this committee nor the commissioner has seen that responds to that secondary issue but would be a deviation from what the commissioner has testified here saying that she doesn't think there should be a change to the civil suspension practice that's in statute. Okay, representative McCoy and then representative Murphy. My question has been answered, thank you. Representative Murphy. Okay, I'm just curious and I don't know if I'm putting anyone on that spot with this but I wondered if commissioner Manoli had given testimony in the Senate when this was drafted. No, I did not give any testimony in the Senate when this was drafted. Thank you. All right, well, I would like to say to the committee that to me, there's been two issues here. There's the whether or not traffic safety where we're going to sacrifice one of our traffic safety tools, if you will. And secondly is this what might be considered a healthy tension of committee jurisdiction. And clearly we have jurisdiction over this issue. And as Barbara points out, you and I would think anything that amends title 23 which this section does. I again, thank Barbara for catching it and because that was the first I had heard of it. And just for your information, like I say, some people may regard it as a healthy tension but I looked in the rules this morning and clearly this issue even if we're not in title 23 is in our jurisdiction. And judiciary, I'm gonna read for you what the judiciary jurisdiction is. Most committees have about two fairly long paragraphs, maybe three. Judiciary has three words, four words. Judicial and legal affairs, that's it. So obviously that could be anything and everything. So it's not that they were wrong and do it but something went wrong that we were not asked about this and asked to consider it. I don't think we should have had the bill because the bill wasn't originally as 114 doesn't even deal with this. But amendments didn't. So I just wanted the committee to know that I'm working on that. And this is not new, this happens all the time when I was on the committee. To me and Barbara, you'll remember issues we had when Pat was chair, everyone natural resources raised the gas tax in a bill. And again, I don't think I would have put it for that but I don't think we were even asked. Somebody picked it up, it's probably you, Barbara. And that's when we learned about it. So these things are all possible and they're not always someone doing the wrong thing but the wrong thing did happen here, I believe. So I just wanted you to know that I'm very aware of that and I'm gonna work on that. Is there a motion? Could there be a motion on how this committee feels about this section should it come up? What kind of motion are you looking for? And just for the record, I did respond to Missy's email. I must have just responded to her but I concurred with the option too, depending on how receptive the Senate was, whether or not they were gonna take up a bill that was compatible test 114. Cause that was, I think that the second option was basically pass the bill as it was presented and then do a follow-up bill to address the issue that we were concerned with, which I was fine with but if the Senate says no, we're not taking it up then I would want what we're doing today. So for the record, I did respond. Yeah, okay, sorry. So is there, there's no motion? Okay, somebody asked me what the motion could be. The motion could, Mike, maybe you've, no? Well, I was just gonna say, would you wanna take a straw poll that assuming, so if we're confident that the Senate's going to take up S114 as amended by a judiciary, the straw poll would be do we concur with the judiciary committee striking section five, number three? I don't think it even has to be that complicated. I think it's just that how we feel about that section that we've seen. Barbara. I think I just was gonna make that offer. So if Patty still has a query, I'd let her supersede me. Okay, Patty. Well, I think we just have to concur with S114 as amended because otherwise it has to come back to us. I mean, we have to at least concur with what they just passed out. I mean, they voted on it. We should concur as amended.  But we really do have to vote on that. I'm concurring, I would assume because it has part of, what doesn't have transportation in it anymore. Well, that's the point, Patty. And it would be a little bit, Yeah. Not hypocritical, but not consistent. Right. It should come to it, yeah, so. I just need to say that I still don't see anything except what we've said we've heard that says this bill has been changed. So I think any kind of formal response if the committee has one to anything, we have to see that what we're responding to first. But I would put forward that we as committee recommend that section five, three be removed from S-114. That's our committee recommendation. Right. Yeah, I would prefer that because Patty, I don't want a judgment from our committee as a committee on the judicial things. Right. Okay. But that's my motion that we. Thank you. I think I heard a motion. Maybe you could repeat it. And it's just a struggle. I make a motion that we recommend section five dash three of S-114 be removed from the bill. Okay. Okay. Any discussion? I think our show of hands is good enough. Those in favor of that motion. I second the motion. Oh, thank you. Okay. Please raise your hands. Should I be clerking this? No, I'm just going with hands now. Well, the section was already moved anyways, a sort of a mood point, but yeah. Yeah. It's a special of our sentiment about what that says. So we don't believe the committee did the, all right. Right. Okay. Are there any no's? I don't see any no's. Molly, your hands up. I've got some hands up, but that's speak up if you're a no. Okay. Unanimous. All right. Thank you. I had my hand up because I had my hand up as a vote. Yes. I concurred. All right. And then I put my hand up here. Okay. Very good. Anthea is voting. I'm not voting. I don't get to do this. I was just going to say that the amendment is now posted to both house transportation committee page and house judiciaries committee page. I believe there is a small edit. I think I underlined something. I wasn't supposed to underline. So it could look a little different when it ends up going in the counter. All right. Thank you very much.


before I dive into a bunch of specifics is this resource. I feel like this is my favorite favorite resource right now that I've been going to for about three months and one of the organizations that we work with at Square gets credit for it, which you should also check out. They're called Hosts for Humanities and they're kind of a brand new organization that's kind of the like an Airbnb but for those who are traveling because of some sort of medical emergency and the team that put that nonprofit that organization together then they all happened to work professionally within the usability space and there's been a lot that I know I've learned from them just the fact that they're the mission and what they do is benefiting so much from the fact that they have all these heuristics in mind and so I'd also encourage I know you're all in front of a computer right now to check out nngroup.com and I put the link at the bottom of that slide that nngroup.com and then their usability heuristics and I want to actually take a moment before we dive into more general broad trends to kind of walk through these when I said in the beginning about how I hope today can be a way for you to kind of see the old in a new way or see opportunities that exist. I think that the this guide and their kind of 10 usability rules in a sense can be this foundation for the way you think about and look at your work. So we'll just run through there's 10 of them and then we'll run through 10 more things of other completely separate things but I want to touch on each of these so their number one rule about the visibility of system status you can think about that as an indicator in life of like you are here on a map that if you see a map you're looking in a park you're in an airport the dot you are here in a guide for what's next and we can think about that with our systems and the technology that we're building the way we're having people flow through the environments that we engage with them online how can they know where they are what is the status that they have within the system the second one is great match between the system and the real world so anything that you are doing hopefully you're doing it in a way that you're speaking your users languages that you're using words phrases concepts that are familiar to to the user already and you're not redefining a word that already has a definition looks like I said these are kind of specific rules but if hopefully you all have the website pulled up and we'll kind of start that to look at later because I think these usability heuristics can be such a solid base for then everything else that we talk about during during this training together and so the the concept for number two is just never assume that your understanding of words or concepts will match those of your users to use what what people already know the next one is about user control and freedom and it's about how within our online spaces people make mistakes and we know that and then they can get lost or confused and that's why you have a health number maybe someone's signing up for membership or they're trying to make a donation and something unexpected happened or they navigated to a space within within your website that is not where they intended to be and so an example for what it means to give a user control and freedom is how within your digital spaces you can have kind of that emergency exit just like we have in our physical spaces how can you get out of here fourth one consistency and standards this is this is my favorite so there's this kind of this law within this usability space that people spend most of their time using digital products other than yours so so we're talking today about how you can get more attention more engagement increase the impact and we can also recognize at the same time that the people are spending the minority of their time in your space right we spend our time holistically across all kinds of different platforms and spaces and in person and so that means that a user's a user experience and their expectation of your environment is actually set separate from your environment it's set by every other tool every other space that they're using and kind of the behemoths in some way are leading that like google search autocomplete searches different standards that exist somewhere else because of some sort of massive technical team and and budget that that entity has but then because of people's experiences in those environments they take those expectations into your space and so behave like everybody else in a sense right how we how we can stand out but not have the usability of a website be something that people have to make up new within your environment and the last one here is error prevention and I used to always talk about we can solve that with help text right like if something seems confusing let's throw sentence underneath it and explain it away with help text but good design within your online spaces in whatever online space that is should be hopefully preventing errors from occurring so then you don't even have to have that sort of help text so the next one we'll get through these 10 and then we'll go kind of big picture but I really hope everyone pulls up that article and spend some time with it because it's also about can benefit even your processes internally how you communicate with each other if they're more efficient ways for you to to do the same process within your organization and not just looking at the communication that you have with your external community so their sixth rule is about recognition rather than recall which basically means minimizing the amount that your user has to remember so the longest I've worked anywhere is in public libraries so spanning all of high school all of college and I know the Dewey decimal system really well but also libraries know that other people don't and so they will like label pets you know and label cooking cookbook so someone isn't expected to remember what number in the Dewey decimal system that is so how can you offer help within the context that it's needed within your environment another way to do that is with their seventh rule of flexibility and efficiency for use we can think about that with shortcuts and how people if they are really tech savvy maybe don't need to go through a whole process that you have within your website and that there's certain processes and maybe an online form or an application or a membership signup an example of this would be often you can give people quicker access to things if they can first log in to your system and then they can much more efficiently complete an action instead of having them first go through this whole process fill in a bunch of information that they already know about you so think about those shortcuts and the way that can divide your audience into kind of two different groups those that are completely new to you though versus those that are have a known relationship and that you have information about them the the eighth is about design right it's less is more that and we know that and I think design standards and you see that with the beautiful templates and square space or Wix how much more simple the interface is in comparison to looking at a website from the 90s which is a small print and the long menu options lots of words and that that I think is becoming more and more the standard and we see that changing even with new app development or your space and so always holding that in priority with less is more and you'll we'll get to some specific audiences then when we get into more of the what's ahead to know why this especially matters when you're when you're reaching out to a new audience and then the the last two are pretty similar about helping users recognize from their own errors so basically this is where your your tech partner comes and play you know if there's a way to if there's an error message have it be in English and not code and what can be done if a user is experiencing some sort of error within your system how can that be expressed within plain language and give them a way out to take the action that they are intending to take and then lastly that the best system doesn't need any documentation right that it's it's very obvious how to use it and so whenever possible then if you do need to provide help support guidance in some sort of form or application process or donation flow that you present that support within the context and in the moment that the user is taking that kind of action just to minimize the things that a person is having to juggle and think about in order to engage with you so now that we've kind of taken an immediate side trail because this has been like I said my favorite resource for the last three months because I think these usability guidelines they touch on so many different things that we do within our work and I do think that spending some time with them can create this kind of foundation for how you're thinking about interactions and what you're building where you're spending your money and your technology investments and then also as a backdrop to now everything we're going to talk about ahead so let's shift gears a little bit and kind of look at the some 10 of the marketing trends so we're staying virtual I officially as of last week signed up and then now paying money for virtual yoga I was holding out all last year and it's like the best $40 a month now I'm spending and it's not it's not strange at all so I think there's a benefit where we're all getting more used to the fact that this is how this is where we've had to be


Russia has changed its battle tactics in Ukraine, a new phase of the war has begun. The Kremlin decided to launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine after failing to establish control over it through hybrid methods and now, having failed again, is waging a war of attrition. About it informed UK Defence Intelligence. UK Defence Intelligence said since 2014 Russia's strategic goal in Ukraine has highly likely been consistent to control its neighbour over previous years. Russia pursued this objective through subversion by fermenting an undeclared war in Donbas and by annexing Crimea. On 24 February 2022, Russia pivoted to a new approach and launched a full-scale invasion which attempted to seize the whole country and depose its government. By April 2022, Russia realised this had failed and focused on expanding and formalising its rule over Donbas and the South. It has made slow and extremely costly progress. In recent weeks, Russia has likely changed its approach again. Its campaign now likely primarily seeks to degrade the Ukrainian military rather than being focused on seizing substantial new territory. The Russian leadership is likely pursuing a long-term operation where they bank that Russia's advantages in population and resources would eventually exhaust Ukraine, UK Defence Intelligence summarised. On 23 February, UK Defence Intelligence reported that in near future Russian forces may again try to achieve some success near Volodar, where they suffered heavy losses in February but they are unlikely to have the resources to do so.


English Video Lesson 1 – Healthy food at a barbecue This lesson will give you listening and vocabulary practice through a video. Topic – Eating healthy food at a barbecue Look at the picture. Does it make you hungry? Think about the topic. When you see the title and the picture, what comes to mind? Making better food choices at a barbecue Video – Making better food choices at a barbecue Prepare to watch Pre-listening questions In your country, is it popular to cook and eat outside during the summer months? What types of food do you like to eat at a barbecue? How can you eat healthier at a barbecue? Note – You will sometimes see this word spelled BBQ with a Q or simply BBQ. Take a few moments to think about or discuss these questions. You may wish to pause the video if you need more time. Think about the topic. What vocabulary words might you expect to hear in this video? Make a list. For example, grill, hamburger, mushrooms. What else can you think of? Take some time to think. You can pause the video if you would like. Matching exercise – Can you guess these words? I will read the words on the left. Veggies Sodium Slather Or slathered Mayonnaise Waste line Compliment Forgo Excessive Head to Pause the video and think of the definitions for each of these words. We'll come back to these vocabulary words later. When you listen to the video, see if you can hear any of these words. You might want to watch the video twice, once for the main idea, and once again for details. Ready for the video? Get out a piece of paper and pencil so you can take notes. Click the link below for the video. Title – Making Better Food Choices at a Barbecue from MonkeySea.com Stop this video, then click on the link below for listening. It's in the description below this video. After you finish watching the video below, come back to this one for comprehension questions. Ready? Click on the link, pause this video, and come back to it after you finish watching the other one. How was the video? To summarize the video in your own words. Talk to a partner and tell him or her what you learned. Feel free to stop this video for a few minutes to talk about what you learned from the other video. Check your understanding with comprehension questions. In a moment there will be a comprehension quiz. Would you like to watch the video one more time? If so, go back and click on the link below to watch the video again. Or, just wait for a moment for the comprehension questions. Okay, ready? Take the quiz. Comprehension Questions 1. Hot dogs and hamburgers can be replaced with a. Veggie birds b. Grilled chicken c. Buttered corn 2. The speaker recommends treating alcoholic drinks as a. Dangerous b. Dessert c. Delicious 3. If you like sweet foods, the speaker recommends a. Water, melons, and blueberries b. Watermelon, berries, and citrus fruits c. Raspberry, cantaloupe, and citrus fruits d. All of the above 4. When you put on your bathing suit, you will be grateful a. That you ate at a barbecue b. That you looked controlled and at ease c. That you took control of your food choices 5. The main idea of this article is a. Barbecues are a healthy way to eat during the summer b. What you eat at a barbecue can affect your health and weight c. You should only have certain types of drinks at a b. Here are the quiz answers 1. Grilled chicken 2. Dessert 3. Be watermelon, berries, and citrus fruits 4. See that you took control of your food choices 5. Be b. What you eat at a barbecue can affect your health and weight c. Did you get them all right? Now it's talking time discuss some of these talking points b.  c. What do they typically eat at barbecues? b. How is it different from the food at an American style b. Why do you think people make unhealthy choices at barbecues? b. Do you think most people care about their weight when eating outside? c. Please pause the video and talk about these questions with your partner or classmates b. Vocabulary matching. Want to try it again? c. This time I'll read the definitions a. Too much b. Go together well c. Measurement around waste d. Do without, avoid e. Common dressing for sandwiches f. A chemical found in salt the symbol is N-A g. Slaying for vegetables h. Go toward a destination i. Brush or spread on heavily pause the video if you'd like more time to answer the questions here's the answer key veggies slang for vegetables sodium a chemical found in salt symbol N-A slather or slathered brush or spread on heavily mayonnaise common dressing for sandwiches waistline measurement around waste compliment go together well forego do without, avoid excessive watch head to go toward a destination expressions from the video what do you think these phrases mean? here are the expressions wreak havoc every once in a while side dish or side dishes pack on slip into expressions from the video general meanings wreak havoc cause big trouble every once in a while occasionally side dish or side dishes small dishes of extra food pack on put on in large amounts like weight slip into get dressed in special clothing more speaking practice role play with your partner or teacher number one pretend you are your partner's doctor what recommendations will you give him or her about eating healthy foods? pause the video and practice with your partner A is the doctor B is the patient role play number two plan a barbecue with your partner what items will you need to prepare? food and other things when and where will the event take place? who will you invite? pause the video and talk about this with your partner or classmates role play number three your friend wants to get his or her body in shape for the summer besides eating a healthy diet what will you advise him or her to do? pause the video and have a conversation with your partner feel free to discuss this topic more with your friends or classmates remember to use some of the vocabulary and phrases that you learned from the video thanks for watching don't forget to click the thumbs up button below if you like this video and please submit your ideas for more videos like this check out our websites for more information www.eslgold.com and www.freeenglishstudy.com


From a sources sought notice, they can give you a credit card purchase, they can give you a micro purchase, or they can give you a simplified acquisition procedures. So all of this stuff means limited building and sole source opportunities. So if you do not respond to sources sought notices, if you're not looking at sources sought notices, you're missing out on all the stuff that everyone out there claims they're looking for, all the stuff that you claim that you want.