It's coming to an end soon, and it just makes me sad. I mean, we saw this entire episode, which is like an hour long in the next one, but still, I have enjoyed this One Piece Live action so much, even more than I anticipated to. So the fact that I'm almost out just, it's a depressing feeling. But ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the channel. My name is Jack the Buster, I'm Shinobi. We're on The Girl with the Softish Tattoo of the One Piece Live Action, and it's time to get to our long park. What would be probably the hardest piece to adapt, I think, out of East Blue? Well, Baratier was pretty impressive set. Well, the whole Arlong fight really has to knock it out of the park, and especially the walk to Arlong park, but I have complete faith because they've absolutely nailed every part of this so far. If you're new to the channel, drop us up, and let's hop into this bad boy. Wait, they're on the way to Arlong. Does that mean we get Momu? Where is my favorite sea cow? This little hop! I already forgot we had Buggy with us too. What are you going to do? Bleed on me? Good one, dude. No! He's just singing about Nami. No shot, brother.  I like how Usopp is the one in charge of just keeping an eye out, though. So, was it called the Konomi Islands in the... Oh, we got... Is that Nami's? Or is that... Oh, it's the little... There's tangerines, it's a little map-map-thingy-ma-jig. Young Nami! We've seen all the young straw hats now. Oh, shoot, no Jiko. Where's Bellamere? Oh, there's a little tangerine pinwheel. Bellamere! Last backstory to go. She was so creepy, man. Flush. Three queens.  Where is he? You know exactly who I'm looking for. You know exactly who I'm looking for. Where's Hachi? Without his head. She smiles. She knows that they might have him. Is the map room... Is the map room actually Nami's room here? It doesn't look like... Oh, yeah, there's shackles. Okay, I'm guessing that's where she sleeps. Trying to see if I recognize anything. Still looking for tiny Easter eggs that might be hidden. I took it from the bookstore. Why would you do that? Because I wanted it? Jigachad. That's what makes us a family. Ugh! Oh, look at all the tangerines, man. That sounds good right now.  I've been dispatched to engage a band of pirates. In the Oigai Kingdom. I don't... The name doesn't sound familiar. When I saw you. You didn't remember exactly, so she just found them. Do we know what happened to, like, Nami's real mom and dad? Oh, man, this scene gonna hurt, bro.  Thanks to you. In base and pirate stronghold... And we're ready... For the Grand Line. Part of me thought you might not be coming back. Of course I came back. We have a deal. Surely he keeps his end of the bargain, right? In every other sea after that. Surely. Yeah, I think the Marines might have something to say about that. The Marines can be bought and sold. Yep. They used to make some experience. Shaa! He's got the laugh! Oh, he had to have, like, practiced, practiced for a long time on that one. That was pretty dead on. Job for you in the meantime. One of the villagers is late with their troublemaker. Go get it. Which one? Cocoa Village. Did you send Corovia a shoe? No. His job requires a human touch. I'm still not completely sold on the Arlong design in the live action, but he was playing the hell out of him as an actor. And your room is closed for renovation. Renovations. We need to speak to the owner of the establishment. They got all the furniture stacked up.  I like Kobe and he'll met for just having good casual conversation. Now they're going closer. On the vice-head more of that. We get more Zeph time. Who was here recently? Name of Luffy? I can't help you. Yep. Ah, you're real one, bro. Straw hat. Always running his big mouth. No, I'm drawing a blank. Ah, that a boy, Zeph. Marble and go to work. We're not here for a meal. We have information. That's steak. Garms sake, yes. Medium rent. That's steak. Oh, I love that. Oh. Oh, this is when they already came by for the tribute payment. Wait, they literally flipped a house, didn't they? In the anime? I swear he did. He like straight up uprooted one. Who stopped has the, oh, it's Gin, Gin. It is Nojiko. Time to get some more. Oh, and a tsunami. I can, Nojiko is like a, is that a tattoo with a heart? I like that. Oh, whoa. God damn. To be honest, if I'm Nojiko and I bond with the impression of what's happening, I would do the same thing. He doesn't have the pinwheel. He has no pinwheel on his hat. He got something for me. Unless we just haven't seen it yet. He dies. Let's go. The whole show is saved. Maybe we can have you do some odd jobs around town. Well, man, this is going to be painful. Oh, it's going to be so, Ginzo. Jin was, or Jin was the guy, the Baratier. Ginzo. He started with a G. That was pretty close. Oh, it was when he first raided it. Man. I can't want to see him put up a building. Wait, I love that. I'm so glad they included that. You're short. This is all we have. This is so messed up. They sent her, bro. She sees them. They're just standing there. Arlong wanted the map, and I conned you into getting it for me. So it was mostly just about the map, not just her earning money. I wonder if her deal with Arlong in this is different than the anime. I never want to see you again. It was all about the Grand Line map, which I think for a regular viewer is easier to grasp. She's one of them. She's a bad guy. The villagers are terrified of her.  I feel like they're going to talk to Nojiko. I've seen men twice your size, and with twice your number going to Arlong Park. None of them ever came back. Look at his smile. He's like, no, it's a challenge. Try the house down that road on the edge of the tangerine grove. Nojiko. So simple. Just a smile and carries on. Goddamn. I think maybe you and I have something in common. I've got the gun. Oh my gosh. Usa is even looking at her. She's our friend. My sister doesn't have any friends. Oh, she said sister. They're not special, and I can't help you. How about a meal? What? Let's change. The theme for Sanji, like light piano. He's the best cook in the East Blue. He never tasted anything better in your life. Usa's word. Usa's word. We have a little dinner, a little conversation. They're like shaggy-ness in his voice. But they better be desserts. I like that, the little piano in the background when he starts. He starts going. I don't think you should see that. That's just staring at him. There's a new generation, and they're coming up. Ooh. Uh-huh. He's giving us more of Garb's mindset on the younger generation. I always tease Luffy. Oh, man. Yo, Arlo and Park is lit. I guess if you're a fish man, I would not be able to enjoy my time there. I would die. They should have a party house. And there's his king's chair. The terms of the deal, that's what I want to know. Oh, shoot. It's the rat. For a second, I thought Luffy and them were already going. It's him. Oh, my gosh, even as the whiskers. Uh-huh. That's where the money goes. Ooh. Oh, my gosh. Let's go upstairs to discuss our business. I like the way they're setting this all up, though. It works well. Uh-huh, yup. He's like, I told you. Yeah. What were that came from? But first, we really need to know about Nami. He's a mature Saaji, bro. He's wild. The truth is, what's going on? Oh, no, it's coming. Oh, no. Oh, no. Literally the unluckiest that he would go right to their house. Shibiru's 100,000 berries for an adult. They ain't got nowhere near that kind of money. Oh, there's enough. Three plates. What about your family? Got the tongue. He's creepy, man. They're not adults. I have two daughters. 50,000 berries. Ah, 50k per child. Family reunion. They're little humans. The money. Will you take it as tribute for my daughters? No, mom, you can't. But she gives them herself for them. She pays for them. Oh, no. Oh, my god. I love you girls. Not for real, bro. Pirate that killed your mother? Well, that's her understanding of it. And Luffy knows that it has to be more than that. It was done really well, though. Like I said, it's like a refresher of how everything exactly happened. I mean, not exactly. But how everything happened in the lore in the world of One Piece. Other people told you to leave, Luffy. So did you. Ah, shoot. Peru. One of our alongs crew.  He's got a good eye. I like that. I know Nami's good. I want her to know it, too. To easy keeping marine patrols out of the area and with your increase in activity. And does he strike them down here? He ain't going to pay that much. This is just the price of doing business. Or he sends Nami out to go get more. Personally, never felt any ill will towards your guy. And yet, the leaders of the organization you so proudly represent. Dude, we're already getting themes from Fishman. To keep the peace, a fisherman is one of the warlords of the sea.  Oh! Zimbe, they dropped. You serve no man.   Damn! Dude, our log's going on me. What about it? I have the money. How much? 100 million. Oh, it was the same deal. And the map, I guess. I'll be. You can hold it out on me. I stole that money fair and square. Now, are you ready to honor our agreement? Uh-oh. Giving her the hope. Right next to me back in here, go. Maybe there's a way for the rat to earn some extra Oh man. Oh, back to Beratia. Two miserable shooters. Good man. Coming right up. I'm up and taking a liking to Kobe. He feels good, man. Well, enjoy this wild goose chase. Not much of a drinker, are you? Well, again, he's like 13. I still don't know why Garb has such a bug up his arse about this straw hat. He doesn't know. Oh, that's right. Kobe found out by just eavesdropping. He knows. You know something. We tell. Garb is Luffy's grandfather. Ah! All the things I thought you were going to say. Even on the list. The way they both love me. Makes sense. Why else would a vice admiral be going after some rubber kid? Trying to reprimand him. A fellow with a straw hat came through here the other day. Oh my God, bartender. No shot. The last of the wild boars of Jaya. Jaya? Two days. I love this. They're dropping little names here and there. It was the best man I've ever had. Satisfying the cat. They're actually bonding over meat right now, bro. Not hunting a boar. Last thing I want to do is put myself in the middle of a family dispute. Wait. Does he? Does he know? Who? It's going to make it less true. Who? The kid reminds me of Con Roger. Let's go. I don't want the boy to suffer the same fate. He stood up for Baratiae when we were attacked. I might be out of the game, but I still live by the code. Well, they found out, so it doesn't really matter.  Thank you for the meal. God dang bartender. Always yapping their mouths. Change is coming whether you want it or not. It's their turn now. Dang, bro. Zef is just killing it, man. Oh my gosh. Oh my God. Quiet. Oh, come on. Where's the fun in that? He knows how easy it is to mess with them. Since I've had any smoked fish. Oh my gosh. He's hungry. Where does he even go if they just feed the head? Bask!  Oh, it stops all scared.  You can't even get it out. Oh no. Oh no. Ugh. Oh no, Jaco.  Oh, but he was calling the navy guy to go get it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He'll confront her at the grave. Now we get the rest of the backstory. I guess I like how they included the hat. Let me guess, you've come to even the score.  It's maybe the best I've seen in the East Booth. And so it begins. Told Arlong I worked for him on one condition. That he let me buy back Cocoa Village. I still wish he had told at least no Jaco this sooner or sooner. The lifetime. I have the money. Still a little. All of it. And now I can buy the freedom of the village. Oh, they're coming, man. They're on their way.  Why didn't you tell me? That's what I'm saying. I'm your sister. I guess because she knows that no Jaco would try to help. I hated you. Oh no, man. That's obviously been stolen. How is it obvious? In the world government, I'm going to have to confiscate it. No, no, you can't do that. It's mine. A hundred million buried. How do you know how much it is? Did you know it was a hundred? Click. Arlong put you up to this, didn't he? Oh, man. Damn, bro. Let me go. They can't do this. There's nothing I can do.  Let me wait. Man. Wait. It's party night, Arlong. Come on. The bishmen are the rightful rulers of the seas. Are they actually going to raid the village tonight? Holy shitties. Now the time has come to restore the natural order of this world. Wait. Still, where is Hodgson? Is he just in the back somewhere? I have never gotten into a show. But I ain't surrendering. Kill them all. They are going to tonight. Oh, yeah. That's why Nami's running. But still. The embodiment of first place superiority. I'm trying to see how this is all going to go down. You will reclaim our birthright. Oh my gosh. We will teach each and every human their rightful place beneath us. Dang, bro. It's outside the village. Outside Arlong Park. Oh my God. I forgot. Oh my God. Oh my God. Jesus. God damn, bro. Screams. You don't know anything about what's going on here. That's the thing he doesn't need to. It's all he needed. Oh. Where are the boys? Where are they? Show me the walk. Show me the walk. Oh my gosh, bro. This is going to be a war in Cocoa Village. Not in Arlong Park. Oh, I thought we were going to get the walk, bro. Oh man. There's only one left. But boy, Nami's backstory. Nice. Very well done. Love the Jinbei name drop, man. I love it so much. And yeah, they're going really hard on the themes with the fishmen and sort of everything that the humans do to them. And I think the standout surprise, I guess, seen in this episode was between Zeph and Garp, a really cool scene. Zeph kind of saying they need to just hand off the reins to the next generation, a very prominent theme going forward in one piece. They're setting this up very fantastically in a fantastic way. That alongside the random name drops about stuff, him talking about being in Jaya, Nami bringing up Nolan last episode.  It shows that the showrunners are here and willing to do this for a long time, God willing. And man, I could watch the entirety of One Piece done like this. I'm just in love with it. I think it's just the questioning the mystery of how they're going to portray different things that I just locked in on. But guys, that has been it for the penultimate episode of my reaction to the One Piece live action series. I will see you next time for the finale. And with that being said, I'll catch you guys in the next one. Peace, peace.


What's up everybody? Today I want to share with you why the real estate market could be bottoming out soon, what that looks like over the next couple years, and why Generation Zers moving back in with their parents at record rates could be an incredibly positive thing for you and your business. If you guys would subscribe so you never miss another video, also click the like button for the YouTube algorithm. And if you would like to join me on December 5th at 5 p.m. Eastern for my 2023 business planning session, you can find the link in the description below. Lot of negativity going on, and I completely get it. People are scared about what happened back in 2008, but I'm here to tell you that it's a completely different situation and that the market is very, very solid.  Now, dude, I think all this is gonna prevent a recession. No, but I think it's gonna be a super mild recession. I know a lot of people probably watching this right now saying there's no way, Ricky, you know, there's gonna be so many layoffs and there's gonna be so many foreclosures and stuff of that nature. I don't see it. I don't see it happening in any way, any form. Now, do I think it could happen on a very small level? Sure, it definitely could happen on a small level, but that's even in question, honestly. But my job here is to play the devil's advocate and really try to show you that more positive outlook on the situation. A lot of media outlets and a lot of YouTube channels are out there trying to really get you to click based on fear and based on negativity. I've said it on other videos and I'll say it here. 2023 is gonna be one of the greatest opportunities that you've ever seen. And think about it like this. When a market is totally expanded, like it has been for the past couple of years, it's really hard to grow because your market share is just kind of sitting there. If you have 5% and the market's expanded as far as it can, how can you grow anymore unless you go get more market share? But when a market is retracted and you maintain that same amount of market share, that same 5% and now that 5% grows with the market as it expands, that, ladies and gentlemen, is how I built my business. In 2008 I got back in and by 2014, I was selling 100 properties a year as a single agent. This is the exact situation that's happening right now for you that you can go out there and literally build a foundation that will expand over the next three to four to five to 10 years to places you've never even dreamed of, I can promise you.  You're gonna maybe even possibly have to get out of the business. And I don't want that. So my job here is to continue to push positivity your way, try to show you a different angle and give you a different perspective and continue building your business regardless of what the market's doing. One thing that we know is the market is 110% gonna rebound extremely strong. But the funny thing about this market shift is that when the market does come back, I wouldn't even really consider that a rebound because it's not really even gonna go down that much. Now again, I'm just looking at data. I'm not listening to headlines. I'm not letting people on social media influence the way I'm thinking about stuff and change my perspective. I'm looking at reality. And let's start right here with Chief Economist N. Shepardson, who says that mortgage rates appear to have stabilized a welcome sign for home builders and buyers alike. Now, what is he saying there? He said appears to have stabilized. He's not saying that it's not gonna go up anymore. It could go up a little more. Who knows what it's gonna do. We have zero control of any of this and nobody really needs to try to predict all that stuff at the end of the day. We know two things. One, it could do anything it wants at any time. And two, it doesn't matter what it does. Closings continue to happen. But as we watch this and we do see what's happening, it does seem like mortgage rates, not interest rates from the Fed, but mortgage rates have stabilized.  I know that we have on our business. And I'm hearing from agents all over the country that are telling me the exact same thing. Let's break down what the National Association of Realtors is saying. Let's break down what the Mortgage Bankers Association is saying. And let's also compare that to what Fannie Mae is saying. So Lawrence Young, the Chief Economist at NAR, he's expecting a 1% increase in prices next year, okay? The Mortgage Banker Association is expecting about a 2% decrease in prices and Fannie Mae's looking at a 1.5% decrease in prices next year. So it's all three of these entities are basically calling for a flat year next year. Now, when I look at that and I think, okay, if that happens, that would be amazing to go through this market shift. Prices have shot to the moon over the last couple of years and we're gonna come down about 10% and then stabilize. I mean, that literally looks like, you know, that takes 2019 and we're still way ahead of where we were price-wise. That is simply amazing and what the driving factor here is inventory, okay? Inventory, where's it gonna come from? Some people say there's gonna be so many layoffs and so many foreclosures over the next eight months and all that stuff, I don't see it, okay? But if it does, it'll get gobbled up. But you've also got all three of these entities saying that the average interest rate for mortgages this year is 6.7 but the average next year is 5.4. So around a 5.5% mortgage right next year. Now, earlier this year when things were at 5.5, that was like a sweet spot in the market where it calmed down the buyers, it calmed down the sellers, buyers were able to breed, there wasn't as many multiple offers, there was a little more inventory and things really felt balanced out. Man, 5.5% interest to me earlier this year was like the perfect market. That was like a heavenly market. And all three of these entities NAR, the Mortgage Bankers Association and Fannie Mae all say and predict that next year we're gonna be at that 5.4 range as an average next year. And then we've got 4.5 the next year, 4.5 the year after that. These are all predictions to be taken with their grain of salt but it's something to look at and watch. And speaking of inventory, let's take a look at this chart right here. Back in 2006, seven, eight, we were in that three and a half to four million range in terms of active listings. Right now, we're just over a million. And when you look at this chart, we're really in that all-time low range right this second. And again, where's this inventory gonna come from? Builders have pulled back 20%, regular sellers aren't gonna sell, sitting on great interest rates. I don't see the foreclosure train coming anytime soon. Distress properties were 2% of sales. That has nothing to do with what might happen if we see tons of layoffs. I understand that. I'm not oblivious to that and I'm gonna watch that. But the grimace prediction of all of these is the Fannie Mae prediction for number of transactions next year, 3.9 million. So in 2008, we have 4.1, which was the lowest of that great recessionary period. And they're calling for lower transactions than that. So that'll be interesting to see how that all plays out. NAR is calling for somewhere in the 4.7 range. So is the National Bankers Association. I'm thinking somewhere between 4.5 and 4.7, we'll see where that ends up. But nevertheless, again, I'm just gonna continue to echo. It doesn't matter. Now when you think about the fact that this market shift was totally necessary for us to be able to build our business and really explode over the next three to five to 10 years, you also think about other things that were necessary and that it took this market shift to make happen. One of them is experienced agents going back to the basics. You know, for the past two years, they've kind of had everything fall in their lap and they haven't really had to go back to the basics of prospecting and marketing and doing the things that they needed to do and the things that got them where they are. So now we're seeing those experienced agents go back to the basics and continue building that foundation. And what we're gonna see is those experienced agents, businesses just explode like an atomic bomb over the next couple years. But it's also doing other things that are quite necessary, like taking Generation Z-Hers and having them move back in with their parents at a record rate. The reason why I think this is good is number one, it's smart and it's practical. And I lived with my mom and dad whenever I was getting into real estate and everything and that was really cool. Like I didn't have to pay rent. I could really focus on my business and try to really get this thing going. And that's another thing we need to spend less. You know, a credit card debt is going through the roof right now in the country and we need to really be frugal and really live below our means. That's something else that this market shift in this recessionary period is really presenting us. It's forcing us to come back to the basics of what we know we need to be doing. Saving money and don't spending money we don't have. But the reason why I like this Generation Z moving back in with their parents staying for us agents is because it's gonna build up so much pent up demand. How many years do you think the Generation Z-Hers are gonna wanna live with mom and dad? Not very many. And by that time the market has rebounded interest rates will be lower and they're gonna be in even more of their prime buying years. So if Generation Z-Hers are moving back in with mom and dad at record rates, that tells my mind that that's gonna create a massive real estate surge whenever these Generation Z-Hers decide they wanna fly the coop. I hope you got something great out of this. Leave me a comment and let me know your thoughts and we'll see you guys on the next video. Let's go.


Welcome back to Tennis Talk, my name's Cam Williams and with Indian Wells starting in a couple of days We have some new withdrawals from the tournament some big names pulling out of the tournament And we still have some names that are in doubt So let's check out the WTA list for withdrawals for 2022's Indian Wells So some big names have been added to the list of withdrawals starting with Ash Bharti She's pulled out of both Indian Wells and Miami not gonna see Bharti until April at this stage Danielle Collins the Australian open finalist who Bharti beat only a month ago She's also pulled out Christians pulled out Camilla Georgie is also pulled out look of his out Bianca on Drescue is also not on the entry list So therefore she's out and Serena Williams will also not be playing at Indian Wells this year Let's go over look at the ATP list and this is a little bit of a longer list starting with Roger Federer He's pulled out of Indian Wells with obviously that knee surgery only a couple of months ago Christian Garen's also out Kane Shikori, Joe Woodford Songa, James Duckworth, Ramos Vanoles, Michael Ema and Dominic team has been the latest to withdraw one of the biggest names to pull out on the men's side Of course won this tournament a few years ago He also pulled out of Miami as well So we won't be seeing team until the clay court season and some of the players that are in doubt There's only two big names for me that are in doubt for this tournament And we don't know what is gonna happen with them in the next couple of days Novak Djokovic We don't even know if he's allowed in the country So he's still on the entry list and he's still meant to be playing But I wouldn't be surprised if he withdraws in the next couple of days and Emerita Kanu She's coming in with a bit of an injury concern for me So I don't know if she's gonna be playing and she's gonna be healthy to play Indian Wells I know she flew over there and I'm pretty sure she's in California right now But I don't know if she's gonna be ready to play in a couple of days time So you have it some big names pulling out Barty the world number one. She's not playing of course Roger Federer We knew he wasn't gonna play for a few few weeks now But Dominic team he just pulled out only a few hours ago. We still don't know what's happening with Djokovic Let me know down in the comments below. Do you think Djokovic is going to play at Indian Wells? He's living to the very last minute to make his decision He must be pulling out the all the stops to try and get into the country because remember Djokovic doesn't only have to get through the American border force or the you know the American version of the border force But he also has to get into Indian Wells, which is a vaccine only event So everyone there is vaccinated and we all know what Djokovic is unvaccinated But let me know down in the comments below. Do you think no lady is gonna play Indian Wells or Miami?


And secondly, it comes to why, why now, why buy property at a young age? Because most of us only think property when we want to sort of settle down. And we do that at a later stage. So we don't see the benefit of having property at a young age because we don't understand no value of what it offers. Good evening and welcome back to The First Time Homebuyer Show. I'm your host, Estie Colassen. Every week, we speak to amazing guests. But before I get into this evening's guests, as you know, we have amazing content coming to you live every weeknight this week. We have Zaman Tungua Kumalo on the Private Property Podcast. That's from Monday to Friday at 7 p.m. All your technicalities when it comes to property. If you want to know more about that, that's definitely the show for you. And if you're interested in farming, we have Mbali at 8 p.m. every Tuesday and Thursday night. If you're ready to speak a little bit more about agriculture, buying farms, investing in farms, that's definitely the show for you. Of course, last but not least, we have Chad Verveiros with the Home Shopper Show every Monday and Friday. And they travel around Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, looking at amazing townhouses, mansions. That's Chad Verveiros with the Home Shopper Show every Monday and Friday night at 8 p.m. If you're interested in making that big investment, whether it's mansions, little apartments in Santon, or big, absolute big beach houses in Muslanga Rocks or Camps Bay. Well, that's definitely the show for you. And without further ado, we're sitting with the absolutely amazing Lozzi this evening. We're talking about youth in property, and also all the goals that he's achieved in such a short amount of time. And he's upbringing and things that have made him reach these goals. And of course, Lozzi, good evening. How are you? Good evening, S.D. How are you? I'm well. Thank you so much for joining us. You know, we speak about youth in property and how one of the biggest questions from a lot of viewers and even friends in my own circle is, is it possible or why is it that there's this assumption that really the older people can invest in property? What would you say are your thoughts around that? So, when it comes to the property market, I feel that it's accessible to anyone who wants to access it for whatever reason, okay? And it's a market, meaning there's trade involved. And with trade, finances are involved. And with property, or in my experience, we need to approach the financial institutions when it comes to finances. And some of us are sort of fortunate to have cash, meaning there needs to be a financial source in order to access the property market. Now, let's come back to the youth. As to one, it's a huge financial commitment because with the traditional banks, they offer loans. Thank you for watching. Subscribe. Click the like button. Thank you.


Next topic is redistribution. As you know, most societies transfer resources enormously across the different citizens of their populations. They redistribute via welfare, food stamps, housing, health care, rent control, progressive taxation, minimum wages, and many, many more policies. As with health care, the benefits of redistribution are now taken as given by a very broad fraction of the population. There's an attitude that all good people believe we should be redistributing, and indeed we should always be doing more redistribution if you listen to at least certain members of the chattering classes. The libertarian response is not so fast. The underlying justifications for doing redistribution are not so compelling in the first place, and even if they're partially convincing, the impact is potentially quite costly, and so we need to think about whether and especially about how much. So I'll discuss this with the following outline. First, think about the different arguments for redistribution. How convincing are those? And then talk about the costs of anti-poverty programs. I will argue that anti-poverty programs are the only kind of redistribution that should survive at all, if any. Talk about their costs. Talk about the design of anti-poverty programs. Talk about their generosity. Then think about whether those should occur, if at all, at the federal or the state level, arguing strongly only at the state level at most. And then talk about other policies that governments use that are not aimed mainly at redistributing but have the effect of causing lots of redistribution and how those should really be the main targets for people want us to have a more fair or just or better distribution of wealth and income. So what are the basic arguments for trying to redistribute? The first is known as the utilitarian argument. It says that each individual gets some benefit, some satisfaction, some utils that we can measure from having a certain amount of income and that this relation between how much happiness you have and how much income you have is totally the same for everyone and that people experience what's known as diminishing marginal utility. If you get an extra thousand dollars, it makes you happier. If you get another thousand dollars after that, it also makes you happier but not as much as the first thousand dollars and so on and so forth. So the extra happiness Bill Gates would get if you got an extra thousand dollars would be infinitesimal, the extra thousand dollars to someone who was starving or in very poor condition would be quite substantial because of diminishing marginal utility. So under this argument, if we transfer resources from Bill Gates to someone who's very poor, we will have increased aggregate utility by taking it away from Bill Gates who got hardly any utility from that last thousand dollars he earned to someone who has very little income and gets a lot of utility. So the net effect is positive. The poor person had a lot of extra utility. Bill Gates had only a slight reduction in his utility. Now that argument can be made totally mathematical and rigorous and logistical but it's all assumption. There's no such thing to economists as a measurable utility. It's just an assumption that everyone has utility function, that everyone has the same utility function even more strongly and so one can use an argument like that to justify almost any transfer across any group in any way by assuming a set of conditions that will lead to that. It's not a compelling argument and economists do not accept that argument as a basis for redistribution. A different argument, broader support and more grounded economics, is known as the public goods or the compassion argument. It says that everyone would like to avoid having really poor people in their society. They don't want anyone to be starving or in very bad shape but many individuals will not deliberately engage in private charity to try to help the less fortunate on their own. They will instead try to free ride on the contributions made by other people. They will wait and see if others give to private charity. Hope that the melons and the Rockefellers and the Gaetzes and the Warren Buffetts will do that so they don't have to bother. If that happens, if many people choose to free ride, then the amount of private charity might be smaller than most people would like if they knew everyone was participating and so you might get less provision of charity than is in society's overall interest. Government could address that by forcing everyone to contribute. Now that argument is logical. It doesn't necessarily imply that we should have huge amounts of redistribution. It says that there's some benefit from a little bit by helping very poor people not be very poor but in no way shape or form says we should redistribute massively across the board that we should be systematically punishing rich people by trying to have highly progressive taxation that takes a lot of income away from them. It makes a case for a safety net for the very poor and not necessarily even for a generous safety net. So that argument while logical and perhaps reasonable in moderation doesn't justify anything like the degree of redistribution that we currently do in the U.S. and other rich countries, I'll talk about those amounts in a couple minutes. The veil of ignorance argument which we came across earlier when we discussed government provision of health care says that not knowing whether you're going to be rich or poor, you might be willing to pay something in terms of taxes in your future life in order to avoid having very low income. That again is a logical argument. It might be that most people would vote for such a plan if they had the option but it again implies helping people who are very poor. It doesn't imply that we just redistribute across the board just as with all kinds of insurance having completed insurance against all possible bad outcomes is extremely costly. What most people have is partial insurance. They pay something to avoid the worst-case scenarios so likewise any implication that government should be redistributing based on the veil of ignorance said there's enough social insurance to make sure no one is really poor, no one is literally starving in the street but it in no way implies highly progressive taxation or the very generous amounts of redistribution that U.S. and other rich countries engage in. So plausibly some argument for some small amount of redistribution we'll talk about the details in a second but nothing like current policy. Now assuming that we were focused only on anti-poverty programs only on spending that was aimed at helping the very poor what are the things to be cautious about even in designing those programs? So first any type of redistribution is likely to generate disincentives. If people know that they're going to have some income for not working some people are going to work less or save less or take less care or work less hard to marry someone who can help take care of them or so on and so forth so there are clear efficiency losses from even limited anti-poverty spending. If it's truly limited spending those disincentives might be fairly small but there's of course going to be some because you have to raise taxes to pay for anti-poverty spending there's going to be some additional distortion because taxes distort economic behavior and reduce economic efficiency so that should be accounted for in any analysis of government redistribution even if it's designed strictly at people who are very poor. Government redistribution also has the potential to crowd out private charity and indeed lots of evidence finds that increases in government support of the poor have tended to crowd out have reduced private donations and efforts to help the poor in some cases a close to a one-for-one rate so that by itself doesn't automatically tell you that the government redistribution is bad it just tells you it's not necessary because it was mainly being off it's mainly just offsetting what would otherwise occur from private charities so despite the public goods aspect of contributing to charity lots of people do it quite substantially and they seem to want to do it less if they know that the government is doing it and so the net amount of charity is not being increased that much. More sort of specively but I think still very importantly providing any kind of anti-poverty spending has the potential to create envy from anyone who is not quite poor enough to qualify for that spending so if you're making sure people who are very poor are taken care of people who are sort of poor but not very poor say gee how come not me too and that's a pressure for those policies to expand and then the people who are a little bit less poor than that say hey how come not me too and there's pressure for those policies to expand and that may lead you to a large amounts of redistribution okay that are way too costly and have bigot disincentives and lead to lots of losses from taxation even if a very small amount initially would not have done so so the risk of excess expansion is certainly something to think about. A classic example is that when the U.S. adopted Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s it did both okay the better argument was probably for Medicaid that was helping people who were explicitly poor but to get the whole country to go along with it with raising taxes a lot to pay for healthcare for the poor they had to also introduce Medicare for the elderly which is something that everybody knew that they would qualify for someday and that bought the political support for Medicaid so the risk of excess expansion is definitely something to think about still one last potential cost even of well-designed limited anti-poverty programs is that they may reduce self-reliance they may just create an atmosphere that says I don't have to go to whatever lengths necessary to take care of myself the government is there to do it if that applied only to a very very small number of people who clearly can't well easily take care of themselves okay to children to people who are mentally ill or disabled of course compassion would suggest that we might want to do that setting aside whether it's government or or the private sector that does that but if it starts to get expansive then it affects self-reliance broadly and that's a potentially bad thing for society to not have people feel that they need to be hard-working entrepreneurial and doing their best to take care of themselves except under the most extreme conditions the next point to consider is how we design anti-poverty programs there of course many many components of current anti-poverty spending from welfare to food stamps to Medicaid to housing to unemployment insurance to Social Security disability the earned income tax credit Pell's grants public schools energy subsidies and much much more so there are tons of different policies a few of those are much much bigger than all the rest but still we do it in this very complicated very messy way what are the negatives of this approach first of all much of it is being done in kind that is say providing free housing projects or subsidized housing projects or free health care not by just getting people cash and common sense standard economics and much evidence suggests people can make better decisions by getting the cash and being able to choose how to spend it themselves rather than having government say okay here's how you have to spend it a classic example would be housing if you give somebody subsidized housing by saying you have to live in this project then they're stuck living in that neighborhood which may be far from where they work they're stuck living in that neighborhood with some people who might be relatively engaging in criminal activity they may be stuck living in a place that's just very unsafe so on and so forth if they get something which is not quite cash but is in that direction a housing voucher they can then choose to live in any neighborhood without voucher have lots more flexibility in choice and there's evidence that in fact people make good use of that flexibility and choice to get better outcomes than if they just got the subsidy in kind so a lot of the current policies are in kind that's a problem the total amount that we redistributing is not at all obvious under the current system there's so many policies it's being provided partially in cash partially in kind partially in vouchers adding that all up and figuring out exactly how much we're redistributing okay is a mess so people don't think about it on that at some level is it makes it easy for us to spend too much because there's not one big figure that can be put in a headline in a newspaper but that's problematic for anyone who believes in democracy and letting people decide how much we should be spending and on what still further the current design is a problem because they're all sorts of huge interactions between these different policies in particular something that economists call high marginal tax rates in many cases if you earn a little bit more okay that reduces your eligibility or even eliminates your eligibility for some of all of these current anti-poverty programs in such a way that you're worse off by having worked harder and earned more income if that's the case many people are quite rashly going to say well forget it I'm not going to go out and do more babysitting work at McDonald's get a kind of low-wage boring uninteresting job because it's going to mean I lose my Medicaid benefits or I lose my housing voucher or so on and so forth okay that's an incredibly bad feature okay of the current system whatever you think about whether we should be redistributing and whatever you think about the amount it should be designed in a way that doesn't create those adverse incentives there is an alternative approach that is not perfect but much much better known as the negative income tax that would simply give people some lump sum amount say just to illustrate five thousand dollars a year and say here it is spend it however you want earn as much as you want if you earn income it's of course subject to standard income taxation but at a low rate so you will absolutely be better off if you go out and generate more income okay so costs are large the design is currently horrific another thing to think about is just how generous current welfare spending is in the United States if we took all the programs that I've mentioned from Medicaid and Social Security and Medicare and food stamps and welfare etc etc if you take all of that expenditure and thought about it just as a big cash amount divided it up and gave it in equal proportions to the poorest 20% of the population okay that would provide an income of about $60,000 per household per household in the lowest 20% of the income distribution that's a lot of guaranteed income now that's not exactly the way it works the hypothetical I'm looking at but it illustrates what you could do and what on average we are in fact spending on all this redistribution the fact that so substantial mean there is significant potential for disincentives really really really stingy welfare programs don't have much disincentive but generous one certainly can have large disincentives it means there's substantial losses from all the taxation we use and it means there's substantial potential for envy and reduced work ethic and so on because of the large amount of redistribution in which we're currently engaging next thing to discuss taking all of that is given for the moment is if we're going to engage in anti-antipoverty spending should it be federal or state governments to do this and I'm going to push the view that it should be entirely left to states it should be zero at the federal level because any program like this has a potential to expand there's always incentives for any government bureaucracy for any entity of any kind to want to survive and one way you survive is by getting bigger so if we do this at the federal level we have one system of redistribution and it always is going to be pressured to make it more generous and to spend more say that we leave it to the states the standard concern is that we left it to the states to have welfare programs or not and how generous each own each state decided to make its program then states would engage in a race to the bottom that's the standard fear and there would be almost no redistribution even at the state level I think that's probably wrong and in addition I think it's good that states would worry about whether they're being too generous relative to their neighboring states because if they worry about that that puts some counter pressure on the tendency for redistribution to become truly excessive okay in addition states are clearly altruistic in many ways many states undertake policies that are way more generous already than what they're mandated to do by the federal government states and cities that have much higher minimum wages states that have more generous unemployment insurance states that have more generous Medicaid programs and so on and so forth states that have much more aggressive environmental policies so the claim that all states would simply say oh you don't have to do this anymore we're not going to have any redistribution it's completely consistent with what we currently observe it's inconsistent with the fact that states were developing their own state level social security and welfare programs long before the federal government started doing it in the 1930s so we should rationally expect based on all that evidence that states would probably engage in this anti-poverty spending to some degree but we would get a better balance than we get leaving it all to the federal level now an interesting question for libertarians is say we agreed that any redistribution any government redistribution was going to be limited strictly to anti-poverty programs it was going to be done via simple well-designed negative income tax it was only going to be done at the state or even the local level nothing at the federal level and it was going to be small so imagine you're a voter as a libertarian in your state and the question is what to do about a proposal like that for your states would libertarians support that level of government redistribution I think across the range of libertarians you'd get some division of opinion you might get some people who would vote in favor of that type of very well-designed very limited a very small amount of state level redistribution okay and I don't think too many libertarians would say that's totally horrific that that's the worst thing governments had ever done my own hunch is that even under the best conditions a government redistribution even if it's small even if it's state level so and it's still not a great idea mainly because we can't keep it small so once you have it it will get bigger once it's at the state level there will somehow be pressure to make it federal and which is exactly what we've observed over the last 100 or so years in the United States nevertheless a libertarians I think could reasonably degree over whether the optimal amount of government redistribution is literally zero or maybe is something that's slightly bigger than that last item to discuss our policies that are not explicitly designed to redistribute but do so and in ways which make no sense minimum wage laws rent controls union protections immigration restrictions bans on peak load pricing many many more policies that you could hardly justify under any circumstances making the economy more efficient they're clearly about redistribution whatever people say about them okay so minimum wage laws are not meant to met the labor market more efficient they're meant to raise the wages of some people who work in labor markets union protections are not meant to make the labor market more efficient they're meant to raise the wages to transfer income in particular ways bans on peak load pricing are meant to avoid some people having to pay high prices by using electricity at certain times of the day that is inefficient in the times of the day that have high demand price electricity prices should be higher the key thing is that all these programs and many many more generate winners and losers from a distributional perspective minimum wage law helps the people who keep their jobs at the higher wage but hurts the people who lose their jobs entirely same thing with unions same thing with immigration quotas and so on and so forth so the libertarians perspective says very clearly if our goal is to redistribute okay and of course we've discussed that we don't really endorse that goal very much if at all but if it is then just redistribute then just say we're having a policy that takes money from people in the middle and up and gives it to the people who are very poor don't interfere in individual markets in a way that sort of tries to redistribute but does so in a kluge inefficient way that just makes a mess makes for complication instead of first letting the amounts that you're redistributing be very clear because if you say you have a negative income tax of five thousand per person you know exactly what you're doing as opposed to a minimum wage law we have no idea exactly how many people you're causing to be unemployed or not okay and it means that you're not distorting all these individual markets with all of these policies that are mainly trying to help some poor people or some middle-income people not have to pay the full price but are simultaneously generating all sorts of deficiency losses distortions in those markets okay rather than simply trying to redistribute so if we are going to redistribute call it what it is okay and then we can have arguments about how much and exactly how so to summarize this discussion the arguments for general redistribution are not compelling but they're not completely sort of illogical there is a plausible case for perhaps some degree of anti-poverty spending just on x anti grounds but current anti-poverty programs are extremely generous poorly designed and any anti-poverty program is going to have some distortionary effects some costs and potentially large costs if small programs don't say small there is sort of there is a compelling argument for zero redistribution at the federal level even if one thinks perhaps there should be some at lower levels of government okay if it's all at the state level it might not be a horrible policy but it's not obviously desirable policy either I think the most libertarians would come down for little if any even at the state level but some might advocate for at least a modest amount okay as long as it's done under exactly the right conditions thank you very much


Rhaid, hi allan, mae gennym Venny a rhaid yn ymwneud yma i gweithio i gweithio a'r ddweud o gweithio ar gyfer yng ngyfaint. Rydw i'n meddwl am y dystodol, ac mae'n gwneud yn cymryd o'r methau Auckland. Rydyn ni'n gweithio ar gyfer y gweithio, rydyn ni wedi'n gweithio ar y UK, ac rydyn ni wedi gweithio ar New Zealand ar y llai sydd wedi'n gweithio ar gyfer y citizen, ac rydyn ni'n gweithio i'n gweithio ar gyfer Auckland, felly mae'r ydych chi'n gwybod bod ydych chi'n gwybod i'n dweud i'r bydd. Ond mae'n ddweud y gallu'n gwybod i'r ddweudio? Well, y pethau ydych chi'n gwybod i'r maeslo hirachu bwyd ddiogel, ac mae'n ddweud bod hwnnw i'r ddweud o bwyd yn gwybod i'r ddweud, ac mae'n ddweud i'n gwybod i'n ddweud i'r byd. Ond yw ysbryd yma? Mae'n gweithio i chi'n gweithio i metaforsau a llyfrwyddiol, when you guys were at school, ac mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'r rheswm. Mae hynny'n gweithio, mae'r bwysig ar y George Ladoffa Mark Johnston, a'r hynny'n cymdeithasol yn y lluniau, yn ffawr metaforsau yma. Yn y bwysig yma, mae'n ddim yn fawr. Mae'n fawr i'ch gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. A'r hwn yw'r cyffredin iawn yn y lluniau. Now, I'll try to summarise their theory with this diagram. They essentially believe that we actually conceive of the world in metaphors and that that's how we use language to express ourselves. So for example, we might believe that argument is war and so we use language such as he attacked everything I said. Now these are examples of two key features within the theory which is they call them conceptual metaphor in terms of how we conceive things I can see things and linguistic metaphor of how we express that it through language. So, since this book came out, there's been a lot of research looking at the language that we use and working backwards to feel, to figure out how we actually think. And that has been the way that research has generally been. But more recently, there's been a researcher called Lynn Cameron who argues that it could actually work the other way around. Perhaps the language that we use can actually shape the way that we think. So, for example, if we use one set of metaphors, we might think in this way, and if we use another set of metaphors, we might lead us to think in another way. And that's something I'm inclined to agree with, and that's obviously what advertising and councillors also hopefully believe as well. So, that explains my topic of Auckland housing and also metaphors. So, my research question is what are the metaphors in Auckland housing as reported by the New Zealand Herald for 2015, which is historically the worst housing affordability so far? So, I had to look at every single day's papers of the New Zealand Herald. And so, there are 365 copies to look through. And I'd like you to have a figure in your mind of a number of how many of those would have front page stories on housing. So, we'll come and see how close you are a little bit later. So, what did I do? Well, I did have to use this machine, which, believe it or not, does exist right now in 2016 at Auckland City Library. I did fortunately find a slightly newer version in the University Library, which made it a lot easier. So, I essentially had to scan through the archives of 2015 to find articles. Now, as I said to you before, you need to have a number in your mind, and I'll come to that shortly. But once I found the relevant articles, what I did was I did two forms of analysis. There was a manual part, because metaphor at this stage still has not been automated fully yet. But there is a second stage of using a computer program to enhance the reliability of my findings. So, let's see how close your number is. So, I had 365 papers to look through, and it was actually 83 articles that I found, which means once every four days. So, it's a very salient topic. And from these articles, I found 215 linguistic metaphors. And we'll do an example together so you see what I mean. So, this is the first of three stages. So, here's a front page, so have a quick look at that. And maybe you can see some words that contrast with the basic or literal meaning of words. So, these are the ones that I selected, and that was the first stage of what I had to do for every single article that I found. So, the second stage is what we're about to do now, which is just having a look at the example that we found. And then working backwards. So, this would be the conceptual metaphor. AHM is Auckland Housing Market, being a moving car, obviously connecting with brakes. And for predatory birds, this is to do with the word soaring. Now, although a lot of birds soar, actually a vast majority of them tend to be predatory birds, such as eagles, et cetera. Now, that's the second stage. And as I did this, I began to find the patterns of meaning that kind of kept reoccurring. So, the third final stage is finding metaphor clusters. So, for example, car would go under the topic of vehicles, and predatory birds would be under danger. So, by doing that, I actually found a total of 22 metaphor clusters, but three were highly salient because the top three accounted for 40% of all the data. And these are the top three, as you've just seen. And these numbers relate to the 215 articles. So, that's the manual part of the analysis done. But what about the computer part? Well, that's using this programme called W Matrix, which comes from Lancaster University in the UK. And the key point that this does is that it assigns a meaning category for each word. So, there are 21 categories. These are all of them. But we're going to look at this one in particular, and each of these have subdivisions. So, for example, for government and public domain, you'll see that G3 is warfare. So, that's a tag that I can use to find all words connected with war. So, you can see here that we've got G3 for warfare and all the others for heat and danger as well. So, by doing this, I could then compare my manual results with what I found. So, by doing that, I find something like this and I have a look and I can see that these are all the words connected with warfare. And then I have to click on the blue lines to find each individual hit list for each of them. So, shortly, I'll do an example for hit because you can see you still have to read them manually. It's not been done automatically yet. So, I still had to click through that for all of the categories that I found. So, by doing this, I was able to compare my manual analysis with a corpus analysis. And what I found was that there was an increase of almost twice for war and heat, which means they're actually even more salient than I originally thought. Now, the reason danger goes down is to do the way that they categorise it. So, I don't know why it's moving, sorry. It's to do with, because in danger, it was, for example, specific words like alarm and bomb and critical, whereas it doesn't consider words like predatory birds. So, if I go back to my original research question, I wanted to know about Auckland housing metaphors. Well, I can tell you that the three key salient metaphors are war, heat and danger. And I would argue that this actually creates a metaphorical scenario because each of those interrelate with each other. And actually, you can say that Auckland housing market is war in general. So, what are the implications of this? So, within my field, a couple of things. First of all, no one's really done anything about housing and metaphors. That's the first thing. The second thing is in terms of methodology. Everyone's either done manual only or corpus only. There's only been one study in 2007 where they actually did both of them. So, that's something that I'm happy to have done. And another thing, which I think for me is personally the most important, is that it's to do with, if we're talking back to looking at language, perhaps shaping the way that we think, then it's possible that if we construe that the Auckland housing market is war, it could actually affect our very actions. So, maybe you feel that you have to be a soldier in order to enter the war and you feel that you're not properly armoured. Maybe you're not going to enter that war. So, we need to know what all these metaphors are because once you have that, you can then decide to accept it, question it, reject it or resist it. But before you can do any of those actions, you have to know what they are. And that's very much where this research comes in as a very first step to do with housing and metaphors. And I'm happy to answer any questions now. Thank you. I wasn't just interested in the idea of the soaring metaphor that's been connected to quickly boots, and I'm wondering, does the metaphor have its power? If people don't know that it's quickly boots at all, because I didn't know that. So, what's the assumption there about how these things fix? Yeah, it's a really good question. And yeah, that's what's called conventional metaphor. In fact, we're so used to it that we don't even think about it in a way, like you're saying, you've got, oh yes, that's right, it's predatory birds. So there's two ways about it. First thing I need to say with this research is very much from a linguistic point of view, this is what we think. There's still the next step of research to talk about. Are they perceived as such? And there's a lot of research that goes, depending on the metaphors, they might be perceived differently. But essentially, the key focus within this research is that it's very subtle these ways of presenting language that we often don't necessarily think about it. And you have to remember, you have to read the whole context of the article for it to really come across as that, rather than just picking up that isolated sentence. Thank you. Hi. I was wondering if you talk. Thank you. I was wondering if you focus on all the metaphors which have negative relations with us. No, no, all of them. I was wondering if we think about the 9-11, the 8-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11, the 9-11. And I think that in the present scenario, the present world, we can't separate, we can't have it depending on what we have for 9-11. So I was wondering, is it for the bad dreams that you are greater, the good dreams of our country? OK, interesting question. So first of all, I didn't cherry pick the metaphors. I looked at all the metaphors in all of the text. So I didn't choose the ones that I wanted to find. So this is what I'm saying is that my findings relate to how it is being reported. So I'm only answering the question of what I saw in the articles. So that's what I can say. So if you want to have a different story, then it requires someone else to write it. OK. There was another question? No? I'm just sort of in... I mean, for Donald, was it coming? The what? Sorry, the... The text itself. Oh, OK, yep. Yep, sorry, OK. Was it coming from people who are issues that are the same just according to the housing? Yeah, so a lot of the articles, there would be like a main bit and there would be a mini-insert where they had some people sort of discussing their own situations and I included that as well. So some of it, a lot of it was from the journalists as well and some of it was included as part of the journalist's story. So I included all of that as well. What are the questions that are coming? So many of the questions you are probably working on and maybe sitting on the house, that would be like, I don't want to be in the room. Yeah, I'd just like to answer that comment. After I did my research, I spoke to a friend who just bought a house and I said to her, this is what I find. She goes, oh, that makes me feel better. It's not just me. Kind of like made a bit of a difference as well. I just wanted to pick up on this theory of cognitive sources. Yep. The implications that we see in the range of this work and their project, I'm interested in your thoughts on how social and how we deal with that given the range of what we bring in the media and the social content business given the push content. So I don't really understand your terms of social content and push content. I don't know what they are. Okay. Okay. Yep. Yep. Yep. Oh, okay. Okay. Yep. So I would just like to say this is my master's, not my PhD. As I said, in my PhD, someone suggested in the previous round that we could look at the comments, for example, in the online version of the text. Just to answer your thing about the push content, which, thank you, is a new term for me. I actually listened to a really interesting article on R&D that had a big generous conference here and they were saying that, actually, despite social media being so prevalent, actually that the vast majority of us still get most of our primary news from the push content and we might respond to it in social content. I know that nowadays that there's a spin-off and the conversation, so there are other ways that we could look at the media, but I think within the New Zealand context, when this is our main paper still, I think that probably still has a lot of power. I think maybe over time it might change and it's definitely something I could look at in the future. Thank you. Yep.


Going on everyone Sam here with late and sports cards ripping at 23 tops for steam baseball hobby eight bucks full case break number 21 Pick your team style read off list for names our teams got Anthony Anthony C with the Red Sox Anthony T raised Brian L. Mariners Colby C athletics Corey S. Cardinals They'll F white socks Darren O. Nationals Edward P. Padres Phillies Eric C with the Rangers Frank Y With the Royals George S. Guardians Rockies Howard Z. Blue Jays Jamie G Twins Jonathan B with the Astros Joseph S. Marlins Keith J. Dodgers Keith S. Cubs Tigers Kevin M. Giants Kyle H. Pirates Lance M Orioles Larry P. Metz Mark L. Angels Mitch D with the Reds Paul K. Brewers Terry F. Braves and Tom C Diamondbacks and Yankees. Good luck here everybody. Let's do it again. Just the pirates available in the next break I think they're 60 bucks. I want to say Not too shabby if you ask me No Let me classify it in the shabby category whatsoever would not Okay, here we go Come on. Good luck everybody. Here we go Sack what up, buddy? It is shabless. Yes, I would say shabless for sure Kyle Call on that one. I'll see a super today everybody. Let's see a super Us up pretty solid actually Shane McClanahan and Yeah, right blue to 75 Willie Mays for the Giants going going on Hank Aaron That is you on Moncada Charlie Blackman Chuck Nasty and Jim Tome going going on Jayrod and gold William Contreras going to the brew crew to 50 I'm gonna walkie. Hey going going on Mike. Piazza pizza, man Dan C. Swanson and Max Fried around the diamond Jersey autumn. That's their braves game use memorabilia Josh young rookie. Yeah, we're having some boxes of like three of these Jim. Tomah. Really? Yeah in one box I'm a last year. That was the case sometimes Trates earner and Mark Appel. I haven't seen it yet this year and hopefully we don't because then it means it goes through another box Right But yeah, I agree. I agree that pristine looks awesome this year. They did a very good job. Meryl Cabrera and going going gone Hank Aaron again But last year every now and then you get a box of like six hits and I did like six. I was VR Michael Harris to 99 nice one there. Yeah, was that including mags or yeah, you get like three mags and you get like three of the like the Jersey autos Bobby wit Are you pretty solid for personal right? No, I know All right, we've got Ian Hap and Vladimir Guerrero, Jr. That is cubs and blue jays blue to 75 Jose Altuva We'll just do like oranges and under For just nags or yeah for for in general I would say Garrett Hill Gold to 50 rookie for the Tigers first auto max castillo refractor that is going to the Royals, there you go, Casey and nice one here for the rangers josh young fresh faces auto Grats on that texas. Very nice box boss position player coming in So Not bad Luis Ortiz refractor Mike trout blue to 75 for the angels gunner Henderson rookie And bobby wit fresh faces for the royals Edgar and Kyle Tucker around the diamond jersey auto ought to be going to the astros What's up, Nicholas doing well, man? How are you down Shay Langlears? That is a josh young Fresh faces rookie John Carlos and Yuri de los Santos bought the box. I appreciate that. Uh, yogi Good stuff, man. Good stuff. Get her down Shay Langlears and Mike trout going going going. So I think that's yogi selling us out Selling us out on 22. Let's go yogi. Thank you, buddy. Appreciate that my man Jason a with the last three divisions and finest. That's out Garrett II with a legacy spot Either robert. So we got to get uh number 23 sold out now yogi. Appreciate you, buddy. Jason. Thank you as well, buddy Three to go cubs pirates and marlins. I believe you have cubs marlins pirates. That's it Mike trout orange lk line to 25 I guess we could just Unless it's a rookie Don't worry about it. Had the rookie fresh faces Alcantara baby refractor rookie for the mess Yeah, thank you, man. Appreciate that yogi outman rookie T swag Going going going shohay Drunko stand in purple trevor Hoffman for the Padres the 99 very nice. It's rookie. Uh, oh snap Michael Harris I have been around for that. Yeah, that's right. Yeah. Oh, yeah, welcome. Welcome to bristine, buddy. No We're gonna so many oh snaps paul blackburn masataki. Oh shita Nice one there. I know von. I know seems like it is unfortunately 75. Shane Bieber For the guardians orange aramis Ramirez 13 of 25 going to the cubs This one there's a mid 2000s love there. Miguel Vargas refractor rookie auto. Let's go into the Dodgers And a Kyle Stowers refractor rookie auto going to the Orioles Very nice Come on. We'll see like a big red Oh, yeah bees Knew there was a bang or lurking in here. Vladimir Kuro jr. Louis Ortiz the 75 Uh, josh young cody clemens and david right cody clemens refractor rookie Jordan walker and gunner henderson the 12 hours and michael harris Ty cob and josh wenchowski I just went there to 25 for the red socks Got it. We'll do Adrian belcher actually this is a legit question. Do you need all three or can we just keep fun? Okay, okay Ozzie smith. There's craig bijio around the diamond my guy Nice one there houston Yeah, I need I uh, I'm gonna need that card eventually. Yeah Uh Right exactly. Oh snap shohei Framber valdez william contraris Uh, oh snap red four of five francisco lindore I just won their mats one of last teams taken congrats new york That's awesome. That's not a good thoughts on a recap. You're on going going gone one. Soto purple logan ohapi two 99 you have sheila rookie Morel rookie Going going on alvarez rookie dan with the blue jays and finest. Thank you dan Appreciate you buddy. All right right there Ryan Howard bret uh, george bret. Yeah later blue zander pogars to 75 Nice one there for the red socks. I gotta check the checklist for this one real quick here I'm gonna have you tag this one done on where um, I'm gonna have you tag this next one Okay, uh, because I don't know what it's gonna say on the checklist. Let's see Part number 275 Um That is going to be one soto 17 of 25 Nice one there that is card number 275 goes to the nationals So this is going to go to the nationals right here. So you can see down there. It's nationals and padres You can't tell really which team he's wearing. It looks more like Washington So that is going to go to the nationals that is going to go to the nationals Based on what the checklist says max mire refractor rookie auto going to the marlins And go to the Mets Francisco alvarez orange seven of 25 Seven of 25 congrats on that. There you go Mets 25 Barry picking up the red socks and finest. Thank you, Barry. Nice one there congrats on that, uh Mets, uh There you go, sir On to the next here we go That alvarez will uh, that'll work right there for sure. That'll play That will play Roger's about to play for the Jets. Oh boy Marte blue Lugan 75 for the dbex. Oh, yeah Oh the Anthony Volpe. Oh snap round racunia Like that means i'm doing my job Nolan Aronato. That is a gold paul molleter around the diamond for the blue jays That's when they're uh 45 of 50 paul molleter I'm not gonna be showing about it, but there's no one gorman To ask her nanda is louise castillo corbin carol rookie Going going on vladimir guerrero at junia That is a brice harper gold cori seager to 50 Nice one there for the arranges johnny bench and oh snap Byron buxman Mookie bets mech scherzer That is a chris over morel for fresh faces rookie for the cubs Last inner pack Leave on soda refractor purple david bednar 275 for the pirates or to 99 excuse me to 99 For the pirates Groshans And a oh snap chris bright or base guards now or are in case guards. I should say not necessarily base uh christy matthewson for the giants cori seager going to the uh rangers Got a blue of steve carleton to 75 for the fillies I also have a blue of andres hymen as the 75 for the guardians mark upel Refractor uh rookie auto for the fillies nice one there philadelphia talking about um wolverhampton And gold rookie auto nolyn jones to 50 14 to 50 congrats rockies nice one there nolyn jones guy hits bombs You say 10 million probably uh, oh wow probably it is it is Significant amount for sure Is it just us now? Oh boy party about to start Party's about to start now all the bots are gone. Yeah, I was going to recharge Wouldn't be opposed to That's what I like to hear That's what I do in fact enjoy to hear right there Ah, all right tell martin gold william contraris to 50 For two years now my palace fan Today was classical experience Yeah, i'm a i'm a west ham fan now and I beat brighton today, which was nice james outman Got a gold masatake yoshida fresh faces nice one there for the um For the uh red sox and david orteets you can find a shirt with like the hammer bros from super mario Yeah, honestly That'd be kind of fire that would be aeronola. Uh, nico horn are around the diamond jersey auto for the cubs Too bad it doesn't want to let you do that, right? They'd be flying flying over here for sure the second that that showed up Where's our money there's gunner henderson rookie Sam's hammered that's the shirt. Yeah, I'm hammered that's gotta be the shirt right there Leave on soda refractor purple james outman. It's card. It's far out, man To 99 You can't have the last name outman and it expects a schtick not to be made my piazza no, I Sorry, it's just just just not not how this is gonna go That is a red of angel ben and tendy nice one there. So it says royals and yankees He has the royals uh jersey on I will check on this one For all of you It's gonna go i'm just gonna go by what the checklist says by what cardboard connection says That's mark, uh ben and tendy Card and this is card number 253 goes to the yankees card number 253 goes to the yankees He does have a royals jersey on but like I said, I will drop you guys the link to uh Cardboard connection. This is going to the yankees If you just have to look up card number 253 That's where it goes james outman rookie Volpe rookie And jim tome Yeah, some of those are a little uh confusing So i'm gonna make that as easy for sorting and shipping as possible you darvis max scherzer Doesn't happen often but once in a while sam comes up with a good idea That's what i'm saying. This one's the summer brice harper going to the phillies. That's when they're philadelphia And hand care. We should celebrate the top over I mean there's no better thing to celebrate than that or with that I should say veritech and louis castillo So i'm in right for it. I would be in liberator Uh no one gorman fresh faces How full him does without mitra? All right, we've got dav winfield kao schwerber Only in case base Uh blue is going to be a ozzy smith the wizard to 75 for the cardinals Got a gold john carlo stanton to 50 for the yankees That is a pulsar auto to 99 matthew batten going to the padres And a refractor auto at david right go to the mezz congrats mezz The captain nonsense. That would have caused Well, you still did it anyway, so even though his name wasn't you still managed to do it yeah Or you say you say uh batten like batman Three to go God Cubs marlins pirates available in number 23. That doesn't break next that breaks after the next one So still a little bit of time then we're into finest or no Then we're into random teams of pristine then we're into finest then we're into flip-flop Puka there's no good answer. Um, I don't think there's no Yeah, I don't I don't know I don't know puka. Someone thought it was a good idea and they rolled with it.  Whoa All right, we are down. Uh, we've got Vladimir Guerrero jr. Corey seager gold the 50 the rangers Josh young rookie going going gone slamming at sammy sosa Brady singer fresh faces the big hurt or popular demand auto jersey auto is gonna be Frank thomas nice one there. Congrats white socks.  I fell on once and they called matthew liberator matthew liberate. Yeah, I know Nelson belasquez. Oh, I told you that. Yeah, we just about done our Henderson rookie And no one gorman fresh faces rookie I'm ever doing a personal I get him. I'll do liberate. Yeah, how to liberate There's ty cob to 99 no one gorman on the purple rookie for the cardinals And then I'll say I know that's not how you pronounce the thing But there's a joke behind it There's christopher morrell going going on of a trout It's carded off for the browns that sucks. Johnny bench will uh, william conchers I don't know off the top of my head. Shohei otani Juan soto and a blue heavenly evan lee to 75 The name's evan lee heavenly Heavenly evan lee he was in bowman chrome last year. That's where that's uh originated masataki or shita Oh boy mani machado jeter downs encased uh gold barry larkin for the reds to 50 orange christian yellich for the brew crew to 25 Uh bret baby refractor bass auto nice one there on the rookie for the mets and blue nick prado 70 of 75 for the royals on the Rookie autograph Okay I'll make super bold claims here And purple joey vato to 99 for the reds That's a gunner henderson fresh faces rookie for the orioles Nessa court says and another craig bgio around the diamond. Here you go. Houston Nice one there second one of the break BGO action. Oh snap mookie butts David vr and a gold trishlin cost this rookie to 50 nice one for the red socks I'll work a gladi jr senile contra chuck nasty refractors a josh young and masataka yoshita fresh faces josh young was just a bass rookie Uh j rod blue riz hoskins is 75 going with bills reddy jackson going going gone sammy sosa mark a pal refractor rookie It's a blue going going gone of chipper to 75 congrats braves nice one there atlanta and a buster posie All right in case cards now Got riley green rookie for the tigers dave winfield base Padres Got a blue victor robel ace to 75 going to the nationals Again just the marlins and pirates on the board. Thank you. Everybody. Uh, whoever took the cubs Uh pirates off the board for pristine. So I think the pirates are off the board now too donnie I think they are brandon with a legacy spot kenny took the cubs. Yep. Just the marlins now everybody Just the marlins on 23 orange rnado One more time base auto tyler freeman refractor rookie going to the guardians And blue levon soto 74 75 for the angels Now I just like eat there be Be in fact correct. Yes, that is your everyday Here we go last box. Good luck everybody. I'll see you super in this last box. Yeah, that would be pretty cool Louis Ortiz refractor rookie a rod to 99 for the mirror Oh snap erin judge Get a pulsar around the diamond ryan howard. There you go. Philly's the 99 cool one there MVP rookie the year that is brett Beatty fresh faces rookie We've got bernie williams yuri de los Santos refractor rookie for the pirates grace and rodriguez a going going on of jim tome Taylor rookie leave on soto to 99 purple adley ruchman rookie fresh faces jazz chisel mike trout refractor Hank erin going going gone John carlostan blue j rod to 75 for the man mariners Meta mookie betto snapped for the Dodgers All right, we've got o'neill cruise michael harris michael harris a rookie for the braves o'neill cruise pirates on the base in case Blue is tim anderson to 75 going to the white socks Got an orange miggy eight of 25 for the tigers base auto fresh faces oswald peraza going to the yanks. I just went there in new york And a jj bladay refractor rookie auto still a marlin in this product as an auto Congrats my in do a quick recap here everybody. All right. We had the orange of josh wen chowski to 25 Red francisco lindor red andrew ben ntendi. That's going to the Yankees We have ryan howard craig bizio frank thomas nico horner craig bizio again kyle tucker max freed and paul malter gold to 50 We had autos now jj bladay oswald peraza tyler freeman brett batty david rite matthew batten marquapel max meyer to 99 kyle stowers batten was also to 99 Got miguel vargas josh young max castillo blues to 75 levon soto nick prado gold to 50 nullan jones And orange to 25 francisco alvarez. I'll do it for the break guys. Thanks again for the filth up next is 22


Appalachian Wireless proudly brings you unlimited data. Unlimited data is only $80 a month for a single line. Four lines as low as $200. Better service? Bigger savings? That's today's Appalachian Wireless. An East Kentucky network company. Get a speed slow to 25 gigabytes per line to 512 kilobits for phones and tablets. And 15 gigabytes for motors. See store for more details. It's a long shot, but officials here in the city of Jenkins hope that if the state law has changed, they can attract a casino and resort at Raven Rock. The local school district here in Jenkins is also on board with that plan. Last year, the city of Jenkins revealed to EKB news that plans are in place for a casino and resort, atop Raven Rock, if state law has changed to allow expanded gaming. And this week, another entity officially threw its support behind the plan. Our school district is in support of House Bill 42. House Bill 42 is currently in committee at the Kentucky State Legislature, and the bill, if passed, would change the language in the state lottery law to allow casino gambling. The effort to attract a casino to Jenkins has received a large amount of support, and now Jenkins Independent Schools is on board. Jenkins Superintendent Mike Jenton said the passage of House Bill 42 would not only give the electorate in Jenkins the right to vote on their own future. We just want the opportunity for the local communities to be able to make those decisions as opposed to them being made in Frankfurt. But it would also possibly provide relief to the state's overwhelming pension shortfall. According to the bill, state retirement systems would benefit from the revenue from expanded gaming through 2029. I don't think we can cut, you know, cut enough spending to get ourselves out of this situation. At some point, we have to be realistic and figure out how can we make more revenue as a state to help deal with the shortfall that we have in funding. House Bill 42 has not moved since going to committee on January 2nd. Jenton hopes the bill will progress, pass and bring about major changes to the economic outlook in Jenkins and Letcher County. When you brought in some type of activity like the casino that could employ 800 people to start and then possibly up to a thousand later, I mean you're looking at putting, you know, a lot of people back to work, that would be huge for this community. I just want the legislators to pass this bill and give the city of Jenkins an opportunity to create an economic system where we can provide for ourselves. Raven Rock Entertainment LLC is spearheading the Raven Rock Casino and Resort effort. In Jenkins, Chris Anderson, EKB News.


Hello everyone, I am Rahul Patil, Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Walchand Institute of Technology, Solapur. Today we will discuss about projection of pentagonal plane. At the end of this session, student will be able to draw the projection of pentagonal plane. Now consider the problem, a regular pentagon of 40 mm side has a side parallel to HP and 60 degree incline to the VP. Draw its projections when its surface is 30 degree incline to the HP. Now before solving the problem, read the problem carefully and write down the given data. Here a regular pentagon of 40 mm side is given, side is 40 mm has a side parallel to HP and 60 degree incline to the VP. Now remember that inclination with HP is given, you have to draw it in the VP and when inclination with the VP is given, you have to draw it in the HP. Now inclination to the VP is given, this case you have to consider inclination with VP, it is in HP and inclination with the HP it is in VP. Now read the problem and can you answer a simple question, true shape of a pentagon is drawn in front view or in top view. As per the given condition, true shape of the pentagon is appear in the top view. Now start the drawing problem, in first stage draw x y axis, name as a x and y. Then draw the true shape of the pentagon, before that mark VP HP, then draw true shape of a pentagon like this and name it as a A B C D and E. Now this is the first stage where pentagon is drawn in the top view. For drawing the front view project all the points, point number A to E above the x y line, for that draw the projections from point A and B, point C and E and point D. Now you will get 3 points A B C and D, because A and B will appear on a single projection, similar way point C and E on appear a single projection, it will lie on a single point that is point A B point C E. Now join these 3 points, you will get a line view in the front view. Here first stage is completed, where pentagon is drawn in the top view, projection from all the points are drawn such a way that you will get a straight line in front view. Now for second stage remember that if first stage is drawn in the HP or below the x y line, then second stage is must be drawn condition with the HP. Now for that inclination with the HP is given, so that first consider any point on same line, here this point considered as A and B. Now as per given condition draw a inclined line with same dimensions, here inclination is drawn with 30 degree mark. Now remember that A to D distance drawn in the front view for stage number first is same, it is drawn A to D distance with inclination of 30 degree in the front view. Remember that this distance must be same, we have to just give inclination to that straight view. Now for completion of the top view in second stage, similar way draw the projection from point A B C E and D. Now for in top view projection from point A and similar way projection from point A, it will intersect each other at that intersection point mark as a point A. Similar way A and B will appear on a single projection, so that draw the projection from point B, you will get second point as a point B. Similar way draw projection from point C and E on C and V E, similar projections you have to draw from point E and point C, so that you will get second intersections point point E and point C. Similar way draw the projection from point C D, here you will get fifth point as a point D. Now join this point you will get A B, P C, C D, E and A. This is the second stage where surface is inclined 30 degree to the HP, inclination with the HP is drawn into the VP. Now third case you have to consider with the VP case, if object is drawn in HP second case must or second stage it is drawn with the HP consideration and third case it is with the VP. For third case as per given conditions draw a inclination line with the 60 degree. Now this pentagon appear on this 60 degree mark such a way that A B line must be lie on this 60 degree mark. For that purpose first mark this A B line on this 60 degree mark and then complete the diagram A B C D and E. That is second stage whatever pentagon is appear you have to same pentagon you have to draw for the third stage on 60 degree mark. Now in third stage you have to complete front view again. Similar way draw the projections from each point that is projection from point A projection from point B up to this project a line because A and B is lie on this line so that you will get same A and B point here. Again draw the projection from point C and point D so that you will get the positions from point A B C E and D in the front view. Now draw projection from point C point D and point E. Mark it as A B C D and E. Now join these lines A to B B to C C to D D to E and A to E. You will get the third stage where problem is completed. Now as per given condition where surface is inclined 30 degree to the HP and side A B is inclined 60 degree to the VP. While drawing remember that mention this inclination 30 degree and 60 degree if inclination with the HP is given you have to draw in the VP and when inclination with the VP is given you have to draw in the HP. These are the references. Thank you.


This is stock number 11302. We are here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. You're new and used heavy duty truck and Ram headquarters. Today we are checking out this super clean 2020 Ram 2500 mega cab short box. This truck has the 6.7 liter Cummins diesel. It has been fully safe and inspected by our service shop. It has a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off. And this truck is 100% ready to go. Only 3000 some miles on this truck. Diamond black metallic is the color. We shoot all of our videos in 1080p, 60 frames per second. So if you have HD capabilities on your computer tablet or smartphone device, turn them on right now because it is definitely your best way to check out the quality and condition of the truck before seeing it in person. And if you'd like to check out all the photos on this truck in the upper right hand part of your screen is a link to our website. Click that and check us out there. This one comes with the factory alloy rims. And they have been plastic dipped black to match the truck here. Has Delium MT Terra Raider tires. These are 37 by 12 and a half R18LTs. And they look like they have probably about 80 to 90% of the tread left on them. You do get a leveling lift kit on here. Frame and underbody is in really nice shape. Front fender is in nice condition. I didn't see any dents or dings in that. Headlight lenses are nice and clear. This being the sport appearance package gives you the painted front bumpers. You can see it has the front bumper parking sensors and factory fog lights. The hood is in excellent shape as well. I didn't see any dents or dings on that. And you get the blacked out gloss grill. Passengers side front fender, no dents or dings on that. And the passenger side rim, no major scuffs or scrapes on there. As you go down this side of the truck, take note of how clean the body is, how reflective and mirror like that paint is. We take these HD videos so if you are far away or even if you're close by and just cannot make the trip down but you're still interested in purchasing the truck, you can see the truck, hear the truck and of confidence in the vehicle that you're looking at before you even get here. So when you do get here, there's absolutely no surprises. And that is why we offer these Summit Auto Fast Pass option in the upper right hand part of your screen. A link right to our website where you can apply for financing, get pre-approved, see a payment quote, even appraise a trade all from the comfort of your own home. So when you get here, all you gotta do is drive the truck, love it, and you'll be all set to go. Frame and underbody is an exceptionally nice condition. That being a 2020, you'd expect that. It's like that all the way underneath has all the remaining factory exhaust and of course the little rockers all look really good. I didn't see any evidence of paint work or anything on this truck. Rear bumpers in perfect condition. No dents or dings on that. You do get the rear bumper parking sensors, full towing package which includes the receiver hitch four pin and seven pin wiring. The tailgate is in really nice shape as well. And you get a spray in Rhino liner bed liner back here. Bed is in excellent condition as well. I didn't see any dents or dings on that. And that tailgate shucks nice and solidly. As you go down the driver's side just as clean as that passenger's side. No dents or dings on the box. And this back rim is in pretty nice condition as well. No major scuffs or scrapes on there. Down the rest of this side of the truck looks really good. No dents, no dings. Does come with the fold up tow mirrors. These mirrors are heated. They also built in directional signals. They do fold in. Not sure if they're power fold ins or not. Looks like they are. You can see that they fold in. I always like showing both sides so that you know both sides are working nicely.  There are no rips, there are no tears on the seats. They are in really nice clean condition. Power driver's seat with lumbar. Factory all weather floor mats throughout. You do get auto headlamps and power pedals. As we hop inside the vehicle here we'll turn the ignition on so that you can see everything that's going on. This truck has 3,958 miles. The instrument cluster is very nice and clean. You get the leather wrapped steering wheel. Cruise controls on the right. Gear selector on the right. Bluetooth and information center controls on the left. Audio controls on the back of the steering wheel. This one comes with the six speed automatic transmission. The optional tap shift is now on the steering wheel. This one has the 8.4 4C radio which gives you AM, FM and Sirius XM radio capabilities. You also have all your different apps here. You can do your climate controls here. Heated seat buttons, heated steering wheel buttons. You can check out your backup camera. You can zoom that backup camera to go right over the receiver hitch. So you get hooked up to your boat camper or trailer the first time every time. And you can also do your climate controls up there too. This one also has Android Auto and Apple CarPlay where you can project your cell phone to the screen. If you got a navigation system on your phone that you want to project to the screen, you can do that. And then it's just like you have Nav on the screen there. So really a cool system. We actually did a demo on Android Auto if you want to check that out in the upper right hand part of the screen on an 8.4. Anyways, you can do your climate controls up there. You can do your climate controls down here. And you also have your heated seats and heated steering wheel buttons, volume and tune controls, stability control, factory brake controller. Down here is your exhaust brake, tow haul and parking sensors. You can turn those off and on. You do get two USBs, two USB C's and an aux jack there. Cell phone holder, cup holders, keyless entry with remote start. And it's kind of dark in here because of the window tint but you get the all-weather floor mat on that side, passenger side seat is in excellent shape as well. I don't think this truck's ever been smoked in. And you can see the headliners in great condition. You do get map lights up there and home link buttons for your garage doors, security systems and lighting systems. We'll take a quick look at the back seats and then we'll start it up, check out under the hood. The back seats, lots of room back here. Mega cabs are always known for that. Latch child safety system. For any child car seats you may want to put back here no rips, no tears, all-weather floor mat, all the way across. These seats do fold down and they go down two different ways. So you have to have that front seat up just a little bit to get that seat down. You can see just how nice and flat that those seats go. So if you got, even if you wanted to put both sides down you have a nice flat low floor where you could, your pets could lay or even if you wanted to take a nap back here you could put both sides down and that's nice. The other thing you can do is you can just put the backrest down and then you have a higher load floor to put stuff on and that's pretty sweet. You do get storage back there as well and latch tether anchors. Get that wood grain trim and cloth bolsters on the doors and child safety locks on the back. We'll start it up and take a quick look under the hood. I would personally like thank you for checking out the video today and hopefully from this HD video you will have been able to tell just how clean this truck is all the way around inside and out. Under the hood we have a 6.7 liter Cummins diesel and today's very clean, runs very smooth. Once again, this truck has been fully safety and inspected by our service shop as a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off and this truck is 100% ready to go. Highly recommend this truck from a quality and condition standpoint and to see more pictures of this truck or one of our other 450 new and used cars, trucks, SUVs, minivans, Wranglers, half tons, three-quarter tons, one tons, you name it, we got it, go to our website right there, www.SummitAuto.com. Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at SummitAuto.com and if you'd like to check out more HD videos you can go to YouTube.com so our Summit Auto remember to like, subscribe and share on this video and all the videos that you see there in fact in a second you will see link to subscribe to our YouTube channel on your left. Link to more Ram 2500 truck videos like this one if you haven't been to our website on the bottom link to this vehicle on our website. Click those, check us out and we really look forward to helping you with this like new 2020 Ram 2500 Mega Cab Short Box, Bighorn Sport Edition and Diamond Black Pearl Coat. Thanks again for checking out the video.