This is the second lecture of the four lecture series on acoustics. In the last lecture which was the first one, we considered sound generation and propagation various types of wave motion in particular harmonic waves. So, it was pointed out that the elasticity of the medium is the very important aspect. Sound waves are mechanical waves. The particles of the medium vibrate and therefore elastic properties determine how the wave will propagate in the medium. We also considered an equation, a very general equation for wave motion for propagation along the x axis. This equation was a partial differential equation in x and t. We considered its general solution which were in the form of the solution of the combination x minus vt or x plus vt giving rise to waves moving along the positive direction of x axis or the negative direction of x axis. No other form of the solution is admissible for this equation. Then we considered waves of different types. The transverse waves where the particle motion is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. It is in the transverse plane. It can have any direction, but always remaining in the transverse plane. A typical example was pointed out as the vibrations of a stretched string which are a string for example and the longitudinal waves where the particle motion is along the direction of propagation. This is a very common thing because the sound waves in air are longitudinal. Then we considered in particular harmonic waves because the particles vibrate. The most of the time they vibrate simple harmonically because the force restoring force due to elasticity comes out to be proportional to the displacement. We considered various properties of the harmonic waves, their main characteristics. Now in the present lectures this one we shall consider principle of superposition, formation of beads and stationary waves. We shall consider phenomena of reflection, refraction and diffraction of sound. Principle of superposition. Let us now see how the resultant of two or several waves is evaluated. Since the equation of wave motion is linear and is homogeneous. Therefore, the displacement psi and its derivatives occur always in the form of first degree. This psi 1 and psi 2 are any two solutions of the wave equation. Any combination like A1 psi 1 plus A2 psi 2 is also a solution where A1 and A2 are arbitrary constants. From this we conclude that we may superpose any number of individual solutions to form new functions which are also solutions in themselves. Therefore, in general it may be stated that when two or more wave trains are superposed the resultant displacement at any point is equal to the vector sum of the individual displacements there. This is known as the principle of superposition. Thus psi will be equal to psi 1 plus psi 2. If psi 1 and psi 2 are two displacements and psi is the corresponding resultant displacement see this principle has wide applicability. Let us consider superposition of two harmonic waves moving in the same direction. Let psi 1 equal to A cos of omega 1 t minus k 1 x plus alpha 1 for the first wave travelling along the positive direction of x axis and the other one psi 2 equal to A times cos of omega 2 t minus k 2 x plus alpha 2. This is the second one. So, these two are there alpha 1 and alpha 2 are arbitrary initial phases.  This is a general form of the expression for the two waves of equal amplitude both having amplitude A progressing in the same direction both per progressing along the direction of positive x axis superposing on each other. We shall make its use in the following. Let us consider the phenomena of beats. This phenomena occurs when two wave trains of nearly equal frequencies omega 1 is almost equal to omega 2 k 1 is almost equal to k 2 when such waves they overlap again using principle of superposition psi is equal to psi 1 plus psi 2. This is the same expression as I had a little while ago but now consider this equation with initial phases at set to 0 just for simplicity.  This equation represents a wave motion determined by the factor cos of omega 2 plus omega 1 by 2 times t minus k 2 plus k 1 by 2 times x. Remember the frequencies are nearly equal omega 1 is almost equal to omega 2 k 1 is almost equal to k 2. Essentially this factor is cos of omega t minus k x with the amplitude usually the amplitude is constant but here in this case the amplitude is 2 A times cos of omega 2 minus omega 1 by 2 times t minus k 2 minus k 1 by 2 times x. If we put omega 2 equal to omega 1 and we put k 2 equal to k 1 this will be cos of 0 which is 1 and the amplitude will be just equal to a constant value 2 A. But here we find this is the expression which varies with t and also x. The nature of this wave motion can be easily understood by analyzing the amplitude term as a function of t as a function of time at some fixed point let us take x is equal to 0 just for simplicity does not affect any physics. The amplitude is then 2 A times cos of omega 2 minus omega 1 by 2 times t this oscillates with time in the maximum value 2 A and the minimum value 0. The amplitude is maximum when the force factor is equal to plus minus 1 this means at times t equal to 0 or 2 pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 or 4 pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 or 6 pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 or in terms of frequency at times t equal to 0 1 upon nu 2 minus nu 1 2 upon nu 2 minus nu 1 3 upon nu 2 minus nu 1 where nu 1 is omega 1 by 2 pi nu 2 is omega 2 by 2 pi. Similarly the amplitude is minimum when the force factor is 0 this means the argument is like pi by 2 or 3 pi by 2 or pi by 2 that is at t equal to pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 or 3 pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 or 5 pi upon omega 2 minus omega 1 like this or in terms of frequency at times t equal to 1 upon twice of omega 2 minus omega 1 or 3 upon twice the omega 2 minus omega 1 or 5 upon twice the omega 2 minus omega 1 these types. You will find that there is a minimum amplitude between any two consecutive maxima. You see the time interval between any two consecutive maxima or minima is 1 upon omega 2 minus omega 1 with an interval of this a maxima repeats or a minima repeats. Hence the frequency of appearance of maxima or minima of this amplitude is nu 2 minus nu 1 this phenomena the maxima and minima constitute beats and therefore, we say that the number of beats per second is nu 2 minus nu 1 just the difference of the two frequencies. Here this figure this figure is an envelope of this transient amplitude modulation resulting from the superposition of the waves a and b of slightly different frequencies. The frequency of the waves is in the audible range one can hear it there will be vexing and waning of sound which is detectable by the. So, this is a very interesting phenomena whenever we have two sources of slightly different frequencies and they are sounded together. For example, if the two tuning forks say a frequencies 500 vibrations per second and 502 vibrations per second the difference of two if they are sounded together we expect two beats per second this means in a second the sound will be maximum at two instance and minimum at two instance is very interesting and easy is a simple experiment can be done in anti lab. Let us consider stationary waves now these occur when two identical plane harmonic waves moving in a positive direction remember earlier we consider superposition of two waves in the same direction. Now, we are considering two plane harmonic waves moving in a positive direction incident and reflected waves and they now they overlap. These two waves moving respectively towards right and left are psi 1 equal to a cos of omega t minus kx moving towards right that is positive direction of x axis and the other one psi 2 a cos of omega t plus kx plus alpha moving towards the other direction negative direction of x axis then using the principle of superposition as before the total displacement psi is given by psi 1 plus psi 2 remember these displacements by themselves can be along the direction of x axis if these waves are longitudinal or they can be in the transverse plane if these waves are transverse all right.  Since there is no result in progressive motion there is no energy transfer to the right or left that is why these waves are called stationary waves as against progressive waves with progress in some direction. Now, the amplitude of the stationary wave is 2 a cos of kx plus alpha by 2 which varies from point to point remember again the amplitude of a progressive wave is constant does not change does not vary from point to point, but here for a stationary wave we find the wave is a stationary, but we find that the amplitude of such a wave is not same for all values of x the amplitude is 0 at places where this factor is 0 that is where kx plus alpha by 2 is equal to an odd multiple of pi by 2 taking n as integer value 1 2 3 which means for x equal to 2 n minus 1 pi by 2 minus alpha by 2 times lambda by 2 pi which gives 2 n minus 1 minus alpha by pi times lambda by 4 does these values are values of x 1 minus alpha by pi times pi by 4 3 minus alpha by pi times pi by 4 5 minus alpha by pi pi by 4 like this the successive points we see at which the amplitude of the displacement is 0 or lambda by 2 distance apart these points are known as displacement nodes the particles at these points remain permanently at rest they just do not move it is very interesting phenomena the waves are there in the region as a result of superposition of a direct and the reflected wave and we find these are the points which remain permanently at rest the displacement is 0 for all times you have a maximum amplitude where the cos factor is equal to plus minus 1 that is kx plus alpha by 2 is equal to n pi this pi 2 pi 3 pi and this gives x equal to n pi minus alpha by 2 times lambda by 2 pi which gives 2 n minus alpha by pi times lambda by 4 for x this gives the values 2 minus alpha by pi times lambda by 4 4 minus alpha by pi lambda by 4 or 6 minus alpha by pi lambda by 4 like these these points having maximum amplitude or again lambda by 2 distance apart these are known as displacement anti nodes these are the points where the amplitude is maximum which is equal to 2a remember a is the amplitude in the individual waves and at anti nodes the amplitude is 2a and 2 consecutive anti nodes as I said are separated by lambda by 2 a node is separated by a distance lambda by 4 from its nearest anti node between 2 anti nodes there is a node similarly between 2 nodes there is an anti node now there is another interesting feature consider again the stationary wave equation gave an above psi equal to 2 a cos of kx plus alpha by 2 times cos of omega t plus alpha by 2 we had this earlier the interesting thing is at time t given by this expression omega t plus alpha by 2 is equal to an odd multiple of pi by 2 the time dependent cos factor is 0 and therefore, psi is 0 for all x all through for all values of all the particles are passing through the mean position simultaneously for all values of x psi is 0 what about that velocities at this incident we find that those between first and second nodes I am leaving sec between second and third first and second nodes third and fourth node fifth and the sixth nodes etc those in the alternate segments have their velocity in one direction similarly those between second and third nodes fourth and fifth nodes sixth and seventh nodes they have all their velocities in the opposite direction it appears something like this the region is just gets divided into segments by the nodes all the particles in any one segment between any 2 consecutive nodes are in the same phase all of them pass through their mean positions at the same time and have their velocities in the same direction they pass through their mean positions at the same time and in the same direction all of them are in the same phase then those in the adjacent segment are in the opposite phase this means if the particles in one segment are going towards right all those in the adjacent segment are going towards left at the same time ok now we consider another interesting thing an experimental setup could stew experiment this experiment early in the beginning it was devised to measure velocity of sound in different materials but we are using it for a different purpose it provides a very simple setup to visually demonstrate formation of nodes and anti nodes in the stationary waves the setup consists of a horizontal glass tube about 50 meter long and a few centimeters in diameter at one end of it an adjustable piston is fitted the other end is closed by a loosely fitted cardboard cap B within the tube it is firmly attached to the metal rod BC the rod is clamped in the middle at the point D the tube itself is clamped on horizontal heavy table now before performing the experiment the tube is thoroughly dried and then a small amount of lycopodium powder is scattered in the gap AB of the tube the part DC of the rod is now rubbed with the resin cloth rubbed along the length by doing so the rod is set up in longitudinal stationary vibrations with node in the middle at the point D which is clamped and anti nodes at the two free ends at B and C the disc B now vibrates forward and backward you see the rod is a longitudinal motion so the disc B vibrates forward and backward due to which the air column inside the tube also vibrates the same frequency the frequency of the rod now the position of the piston a is adjusted in such a way that the air column in the tube resonates resonates means the natural frequency of the air column in the tube is same now as the frequency with which the rod is vibrating the natural frequency of the air column can be adjusted by adjusting the position of the piston a and this is the experiment so the position of the piston a is now adjusted in such a way that the natural frequency of the air column becomes equal to the frequency of the rod and the resonate and the air column sounds loudly to the node produced by the rod this is indicated by the violent motion of the lycopodium powder which is there in the tube at various places along the tube now we are there are stationary waves in the tube these waves are formed by the superposition of direct and reflected waves they are reflected by the piston a you have incident and direct wave of the same frequency one traveling in one direction the other traveling in the opposite direction and stationary waves are formed nodes and anti nodes are formed the powder gets gathered in a small heaps at the nodes as there is no motion there and gets displaced from the anti nodes as shown in the figure it is a very clear simple demonstration of the formation of nodes and anti nodes alternately and also the property that there is no motion at the nodes now we come to the study of this phenomena of reflection a reflection and the fraction of sound waves when a sound wave is incident upon a surface a portion of its energy is absorbed by the surface and the remainder bounces back have become reflected from the surface a perfectly hard surface will reflect back all of the energy a perfectly hard surface really does not exist the idea is if this the harder surfaces more will be the reflection coefficient this figure shows the incidence of a series of plane wave fronts on the reflecting surface a a prime the arrows normal to the wave fronts or rays which represent the direction of propagation or drawn to represent the incidence and the consequent reflection of the wave front the angle of incidence theta i is equal to the angle of reflection theta r note that is stationary wave patterns will occur from these reflections let us consider the sound field resulting from the reflection consider plane harmonic waves the intersection of these waves along the normals to the reflecting surface constitutes a projection of the incident and reflected waves from the concept of a motion the distance between crests I mean between consecutive crests or consecutive compressions or consecutive rare factions along the normal is like projected wavelength lambda prime which is related to the wavelength lambda of the incident wave as follows lambda prime is equal to lambda divided by cos of theta i which is equal to lambda sec of theta i in obeying the laws of reflection the reflected wave also produces a traveling wave the projected wavelength also equal to lambda prime hence where occurs along any normal line the superposition of two waves traveling in opposite directions with wavelength lambda prime from the concept of a stationary waves it can be inferred the straight away that nodes and anti nodes occur along the normal line and the spacing between them needs only to be modified by the factor sec theta i for the spatial case of theta i equal to 0 which means the normal incidence the nodal spacing reduces to the standard value lambda by 2 between any two nodes or any two anti nodes as the angle of incidence increases the spacing between the nodes likewise increases and in the limit theta i equal to pi by 2 there is no reflected wave and thus the stationary wave field vanishes the phenomena of sound wave reflection finds many applications see the time it takes for a sound wave pulse to travel from a transducer at sea level to the ocean bottom and for the eco to travel back gives a measure of depth of the water further comparison of the spatial characteristics of the reflected wave with those of the original generated waves provides an ample measure the geological composition of the ocean bottom for example the occurrence of silt or rock or sand or coral and so on reflected sound is also used in an analogous way by geologists to gauge the depth and composition of a stratified layers in the earth crust to locate the occurrence of oil natural gas or mineral deposits let us now consider refraction this phenomena is more familiar in optics than in acoustics here the direction of the advancing wave front is bent away from the state line of travel refraction occurs as a result of the difference in the propagation velocity as the wave travels for one medium to a different medium in the optical situation refraction occurs rather suddenly is the wavelengths are very small when the light waves cross the sharp interface between the atmosphere outside and say glass at the surface of a lens because light travels with slower speed in glass then what it does in air at audible frequencies of sound waves the wavelengths are so long that refracting apparatus would have to be extremely large in order to render observable acoustic refractions this picture very similar to what one have in optics the propagation is from medium 1 to medium 2 velocity in medium is v 1 then velocity in the second medium is v 2 the refracted ray moves away from the normal or towards the normal is really determined whether the velocity v 2 is more or less relatively basically the basic structure is essentially the same the basic law of refraction sin theta incident divided by v 1 is equal to sin theta refraction divided by v 2 theta incidence is the angle of incidence theta area refract is the angle of refraction v 1 is the speed of sound in medium 1 v 2 the speed of sound in medium 2 the above relation is analogous to this nels law or light refraction see the analysis of acoustic refraction does not easily figure prominently we most of the time we really do not bother very much about it in a caustic studies but we cannot overlook the fact that zones of severe temperature difference and thereby severe velocity difference do occur in the atmosphere and oceans when sound travels from zone to zone often across regions of severe temperature gradients the direction of propagation changes majorly to an extent which cannot be ignored for example the surface of the earth heats up more rapidly then the atmosphere on a sunny day the temperature of the earth close to the ground rises correspondingly now as the speed of sound is higher in the warmer lower surface sound waves traveling horizontally are refracted upwards similarly on a clear night the earth crust cools more quickly and a layer of cooler air forms and bends the sound waves downwards towards the surface towards the earth surface does noise from industrial plant for example would be refracted downwards at night and which seem louder to a homeowner residing near the plant then during the day when the upward refraction occurs this is quite often the case let us now consider the fraction of sound this figure shows sound waves incident on a partial barrier some of the sound is reflected back some continues onwards unimpeded and some of the sound bends are diffracts over the top the barrier costs and acoustical shadow which is not defined sharply another example of the fraction is bending of sound around the building corner usually can hear voices on the other side of a wall that is approximately 3 meters or so high it is a wavelength dependent effect the sound at lower frequencies larger wavelengths tend to deflect over partial barriers more easily than the sound at higher frequencies moreover the sharpness and extent of the sound zone behind the barrier depends on the relative positions of the source and the receiver the closer the source is to the barrier the longer is the shadow zone on the other side of the barrier and that is greater is the sound reduction that is all we need to know about sound diffraction so we have come to the end of this lecture.


Hey guys, it's Dr. Nathan Cashin at Natural Family Health Clinic here once again with my weekly book review and this book is a quick one, a short one, so I'm just going to be sharing three lessons from, don't just sit there, transitioning to a standing and dynamic workstation for whole body health and this is another book by one of my favorite authors currently, Katie Bowman. You can find her at NutritiousMovement.com and she's got a bunch of books, a couple that I've already done, Movement Matters, Whole Body Barefoot, Move Your DNA and her first one was Alignment Matters. Lots of writing on her blog but this one really is about the current fad of stand up workstations. So three lessons from this book, number one, sitting is not the problem and standing is not the fix. So if you think about it, sitting at work has not really been around for that long, right? Within the past hundred years we started standing, more industrial jobs, lots of injuries occur then so you can get just as many injuries by standing for eight hours a day as you can sitting. So moving from these low desks chairs to a standing workstation is not really going to be the fix because the real problem is simply that we're not moving enough. So the problem is sitting in static postures where our joints do not move through the full range of motion, our hips get tight, our calves get short and we're just not moving the way that we were meant to. So that brings me to lesson number two which is the right way, the right way to stand, the right way to move, the right way to work is as many ways as possible. So what does that mean? Variation is really key. So sitting in one position all day is not healthy. Standing in one position all day isn't really that healthy either. If you lay in bed for a week at a time that isn't healthy. So what do we have to do? We have to vary the way that we sit, move and work. So she's got a couple photos in here and if you follow her on Twitter you see her workstation is very fluid so it will be sitting on the floor in the splits with a laptop in front of her. It is squatting sometimes. It is putting a pile of books on her desk so that she can stand at her computer. It is finding as many different ways to move and position yourself throughout the day to keep the joints moving and keep your body moving. My favorite quote I think in the book is if you want to make your body stronger I think you can fill in healthier, fitter. If you want to make your body stronger you have to move, period. That takes me to lesson number three and that is that it's not just your body that suffers, right? So we have this idea that oh I've got low back pain or oh my shoulders are hunched forward and I need to move because it's it's all about the body. Well it's not just that. The other thing that happens is we're sitting in front of these devices that are within a couple of feet from our face and our eyes which are meant to gaze off into the distance are stuck looking at the short distance and so we become very myopic. The muscles of our eyes actually shorten and lose the ability to go from that far distance to the near and this is something that I've kind of been playing with lately myself is I will just gaze off into the distance like I am now I can see the trees off on the horizon taking a break for about two to three minutes every 20 to 30 minutes so about every half hour you get up you move you look out the window you look as far as you can and allow your eyes to adjust so it's not just about our bodies it's also our eyes but then the other thing that she talks about really briefly is blood flow. So when standing was very common varicose veins became a big problem. The reason is blood pools into the lower extremities those veins get a little bit dilated there's a lot of pressure there and those veins lose the ability to pump blood. Well the reason they do is so our arteries the veins or vessels that take the blood from the heart and lung to the rest of the body work because of the heart pumping and so there's pressure this is when you get your blood pressure that's 120 over 80 or whatever it is that first number is the pressure of your blood going away from the heart but the only thing that makes it move is is the heart. The heart doesn't pump the blood back to it the way that blood comes back is through the veins which have a series of valves up and down those tubes but the blood has to get pumped up to each level it's kind of like the locks like the Panama Canal where the blood fills the gate shut they open the next one the blood fills the gate shut it goes to the next one so what is the pump it's our muscles it's movement especially our calves for those lower extremities they pump more blood through the body than anything else other than the heart so if we're not moving throughout the day our blood tends to pull down below and that can in turn lead to these varicose veins so one way to prevent them is to continue moving throughout the veins so it's not just our bodies the physical movement but it's also the internal organs it's our eyes and the veins so standing up doesn't fix the problem the right way is as many different ways as you can and it's not just our bodies that suffer I should mention also it's also our minds right there's a wonderful quote by Henry David Thrill where he talks about sitting down trying to write and not having thoughts come to him but the moment that he begins to move thoughts burst forth and fertilize his brain it's a wonderful quote really emphasizing the importance of movement not just for our physical well-being but our mental and our emotional well-being so in the end the suggestion is to restructure our work day by throwing in these micro breaks of two to three minutes where we do stretches we do movements and she's got a lot of great illustrations and images in here she talks through how to do them that you should vary on certain days you do all of them during your breaks on other days you focus on one and really try to stretch deep and taking breaks like walking meetings phone calls while you're walking around the office so restructuring the work day but then also restructuring the entire concept of work really taking a look at is your job satisfying is it fulfilling the needs that you have and maybe there's a way to work from home so that you can sit on the floor and stretch and squat and change your position more frequently so it's not just about getting a fancy expensive desk stand-up desks or sit-to-stand desks can run anywhere from 300 to thousands and thousands of dollars these are all things that we can do on a budget without having to buy anything new it's simply rethinking the way that we work highly recommend don't just stand there it is or don't just sit there it is only about a hundred pages so I read it just in this past week and I think it's really important for us to understand that movement is key even in the workplace so thanks for watching again I hope you're enjoying these please leave me comments down below if there's a book that you think I should review and if you have any thoughts on sitting and standing at work good to talk to you again keep moving I'll see you next week


Now, the head of the family of the late Moshut Kashimawa Biola in Abelkutur-Gonstate, Moritola Biola, has called on those aspiring to become the presidents of the country in 2023 to get a copy of the 1993 manifesto of the presumed winner of the 1993 presidential election in Nigeria. Abel Hustler, these after the special prayer held at the family house located in Abelkutur, noted that the manifesto contains different social welfare programs for the poor, young and old in the society. He said that the document will have the masses and also promotes unity in the country. I found out about my own. I'm an old man. We are traveling overseas. If I live in Nigeria this night, if I live in America this night, they will carry me to all people's homes. They will take care of me, medically, through everything. Even if I die, if they don't clean my clothes. All these programs are supposed to be there. But we are all traveling overseas. We are seeing these. Then we call back home. We don't do anything. The money will be finished. He who is keeping the money will be finished. On this day, we will remember him as a person. We will send our prayers to him. And we'll also remember what he stood for and what he promised us Nigerians and look forward and hope that the one Nigeria that he strove for, that we all voted for him right across the country, east, west, north, central, all parts of the country came out in their huge numbers and supported him. And that we continue to work towards his goal so that he would not have laboured in vain, but that we will continue to have a strong united Nigeria where we are not divided by ethnicity, religious or anything. But we are completely focused on making our country great.


I think take us back and give him Friday 11 o'clock in the morning. Trump week! Okay? Tim Appertellus, Cynthia Sinclair. We're ready to go on Trump week, and the title of our show, you're going to like this, is the rapper coming off the economy, lest we forget. And he's trying hard to avoid being blamed, but we know better. Okay. And before we get to that, which we got to get to, we wanted to continue the discussion about the photo of Trump in El Paso. Tim, you wanted to say something else about that?  Good morning first. I do want to, we kind of glossed over it at the last show, and I felt that was a moment in time for the presidency, any presidency not to forget is something of this kind of photo image of the orphan of that child, the orphan of two parents that tried to shield that baby from the El Paso shooter. And so here we are in the hospital, and here's Donald Trump and Melania. It's a photo op. It's clearly a photo op. And what an inappropriate, horrific time for the relatives of that family, and that's the uncle right there. And it's just one of those moments, I call it a visual of deplorable. It's one of those moments in the presidency of this particular president that you just cannot erase from your memory. I was just casually trying to remember similar moments of this presidency, and I came up with the following. Remember when he mocked the disabled journalist, and he was mimicking his neuromuscular disability? That was a disgrace. That was a disgrace. Remember, he was taking on the Gold Star family and trying to harass them? A Gold Star family. Remember when he was pushing aside the Prime Minister of Montenegro, that visual, and so he can get in front of the line in a Justice Jacket, and, you know, there was a moment of a visual of a deplorable action. Remember when he basically said that John McCain wasn't a hero because he was captured? So this presidency just has moment after moment after moment of these visuals. But not you forgot the time that he debased the American Cemetery in northern France. I did forget that. Yeah. That was hideous. I did forget that. Then I forgot what he said in Helsinki about taking the word of Vladimir Putin versus his own intel agencies, and not believing that Vladimir Putin and Russia got involved with the 2016 election. There's just so many that we can forget, but I don't want to forget. So how do you connect the dots on this? Why don't want to forget them? Is it a stupidity? Yeah. Is it a stupidity? Is it a lack of character? Is he trying to get our attention without rageous remarks? Why does he do this sort of thing? What motivates him? There's something missing. There's, I don't know what gene it is or what chromosome, but there's something missing within this individual, and I don't think he's conscious of it. I think it just comes natural, and it came natural for him to take that photo opportunity at that time with a big smile on his face and a thumbs up in the most worst of times to try to pull something like that off. I mean, everyone should say, what was he thinking? What was he doing? It was almost as if he was sending a violent sort of signal to his face, and look, build a bucket like that. And that's what it seemed, that's what it said to me, look, success, right? All these dead people. His child is an orphan. Success. All of Mexican descent. Exactly. All of it. It's like, success. And the thing too that struck me was that, you know, most of the, not most, all of the victims that were in the hospital refused to let him come and visit them. So his only hope for a photo op was either with the hospital staff, which he did a little bit of, right? And then with this baby, and I find it hard to believe that he didn't offer money to this uncle to bring the baby back. I agree. All I know is it's a visual that will never be erased from my memory, and for any presidency to have a collection of these memories attached to it, we'll never see something like this again in our lifetimes. Hey, let's talk about something that's not as graphic, but nevertheless profound. Let's talk about the stock market. Down 800 points this week. Yeah. Twice. Twice, yeah. What is going on with the stock market? And what is going on with the economy? And what is going on with Trump trying to blame it all on his Fed chairman? Yeah. Well, it's unfortunate that he's trying to blame it on the Fed chairman, because I think the quotation was he came in too late and too much as far as easing up on the Fed overnight rate. The bottom line is he can't blame the Fed on this. This is his direct result of his tariffs, and if you notice that he actually finally took responsibility to acknowledge that a tariff isn't just going to impact China, he made and acknowledged that it was going to impact the consumers of this country, the Walmart shoppers. And how did he acknowledge that? Well, he extended the tariff increase till December 1st, saying, I want to make sure that Christmas season isn't impacted by this.   I don't think he realized what he was saying when he said that. Really? I really don't think he realized he was admitting that these tariffs do affect people in our country. I don't think he really realized that he was saying it. I don't think they did either.  Well, there you go. They're getting it. They're getting papers of foreclosure. Yeah, only some of them, because some of them are starting to wake up and go, wait, you know, I'm taking, and I saw some interviews with some of them during this last week. And some of them are saying, yeah, and I'll take the handout. But I'd rather have, you know, three seasons worth of, you know, my product being grown and sold. These are some of these Chinese markets that they have, you know, they've been 40 years in the development. They're not going to be able to just reestablish them once Trump is gone or once Trump. Exactly, it's political. Yeah. It's a political handout. It is. Meanwhile, their markets are disappearing permanently because China is buying from other places. And it's not going to come back. And those connections will outlast Trump. Yes, they will.  I mean, let's look at, we've been in a decade of economic growth. Sooner or later, all recessions come back, OK? And it's where we are at. However, what was the catalyst of this recession? I do believe it is the tariffs. You see now an inverted yield curve on the two-year treasury. And you see a flight from a flight to safety from the stock market to that two-year. That's now adjusted up a bit from the last couple of days. But the bottom line is we have a credibility problem, a concern. And it's not just the United States down the NASDAQ. It's worldwide. Yeah, and I think part of it, you know, you can say this is the tariffs. And maybe the tariffs is a demonstration of it. Is that he's unpredictable. The United States is unpredictable. You can't rely on it anymore. And this is just pretty serious in terms of attracting foreign investment. For example, there was an article in the paper this week on that offshore investments in real estate in the United States and in Hawaii have dramatically shrunk over the last year. They no longer have confidence in the stability of our real estate market. They're not investing. They're down by a substantial percentage.  Well, a big part of that was the Chinese investors. And they're having a hard time getting their money out of China now. Well, that takes us to our relationship with China, isn't it? I mean, the animosity that you might expect from Xi Jinping has filtered down to the street because the propaganda machine and in China, everything is part of the propaganda machine has turned public opinion against the United States. So if you ask the average fellow on the street, he's going to be angry at the United States for having disabused China's economy this way. At the same time, and I find this really extraordinary in the context of the Hong Kong riots, which are really important. We need to talk about that. Trump is saying, Xi Jinping is my buddy. We have a wonderful relationship. Wait a minute, we're having a trade war for a year now. It's really awful trade war. It's so aggressive. And he's the one who started it lest we forget. And he's the one who continues it and accelerates it and exacerbates it all the time. Every week, it's his biggest distraction from other things in which he has failed. But he says, Xi Jinping, he's my buddy. Are you kidding me? This is double-think. That's what it is out of George Orwell. It's double-think. But the context of that remark was what is going on in Hong Kong. He's not really supporting the protesters who are protesting for democracy in Hong Kong. He's supporting Xi Jinping. And Xi Jinping is doing things that are very potentially murderous in terms of dealing with those protesters. Well, you want to make sure it's not another tenement square for sure. And he should be more forceful as a president of the United States and a spokesperson for liberty. He's not. He's not saying anything. He's staying quiet about all of it.  It's the same sort of thing. And even those troops who are lining up in Shenzhen and the soccer stadium with their armored personnel carriers ready to come across into Hong Kong and shoot people, they're really nice people, too. Just like the supremacists. You know, this is like weird. It's like the baby picture. Weird. I'm glad you said that because that just came into my mind. I keep using the word obtuse. It's just so obtuse to these obvious things of humanity, and he just doesn't get it. Well, period. It's kind of a common thing for narcissistic people to be that way, because they kind of put themselves above everybody else. They think they're better than everyone else. And so they live in this sort of strange bubble where they don't even realize, because they think they're so entitled to what they have and their thoughts and their ideas. They just assume everybody should think the same way, too. Yeah. Well, well, you know, I think what we have here is that narcissism is a pretty serious problem because the president of the United States. Really, I mean, if it was me, I'd have the 25th Amendment rolled out immediately. And if that didn't work, I'd have a regular old-fashioned impeachment, you know? Well, Scaramucci is basically indicating that the president is off the wheel. Off the track. He's fallen off the track. He's getting worse. The power's going to his head. Yeah. I saw Scaramucci on Bill Maher a couple of days ago. Scaramucci's off the track, too. Yeah, I know. He's kind of a nutcase, too. Yeah, I know. And you keep thinking, how could he have been elected to serve in the White House? He's off the track. He was there 18 days before Trump fired him. It was like a reality show. The whole government is like a reality show. Let me answer that question. Trump said it himself. I depend on the media to do my vetting for me when they were bringing in the new proposed deputy of the National Intelligence Agency. He said, well, the media does my vetting. Yeah. They tell me on all the web. What kind of crazy con? First off, he hates the media, but now I'm going to let them do all my vetting for all my staff picks. What kind of crazy talk is that? So you know, what I get, you know, always looking for common, you know, threads, denominators, always looking to connect the dots, is that his promises that he started out, this is really a challenge for the American people who really don't get all the news and they don't process the news very well. Sorry to say, this is a real threat to our democracy that people do not get and process the news. Exactly right. He's failed. There's so many promises. He's failed. I mean, he made bad promises and then he failed in the promises. And then he doubled down on it and now he blames someone else. You know, there's the whole sequence of events. It's really nutcakes. And that is what we're seeing. And we're going to see more of that. And the question is, is whether the American people understand what's going on? I mean, look at North Korea. North Korea firing missiles every few days and they made a threat on South Korea. They said they were never going to have a peace talk with South Korea again. This is Kim Jong-un going bonkers. What has he succeeded with in bringing China to where he wanted, although nobody knows what he wants from it? Nobody knows what he wants.  It's service soldiers, anti-Chinese elements in the country. And what has he achieved in Europe, except to divide it so that Russia could conquer it? Incredible. So what kind of success actually, as he had it, and the tax reform act was for the rich? I mean, there's no legislation that he has passed that means anything for the benefit of the country. Pushing coal, really?  And all these things considered and no promise was worthy and no promise he has kept. And yet, he supports him. Really, what a statement about our country. And commentator after commentator says, no, he's gonna win. He's gonna win. Oh my God. Well, not only the supporter, but they really think he's accomplished a lot. And I'm going, what specifically? Rollback regulations. They wanted them. Well, there we go. That's what they think is a good thing. Oh, we don't need to fix those endangered species anyway. Who cares? Just let them go. Who needs an American bald eagle? Yeah, we don't need them. There's the bears. Who needs them? We don't need them. So that's the kind of stuff that they think you do. Well, they wrapped themselves around the flag and he literally did it that one day. That made me sick. I don't know what I'm saying. So, you know, if the bald eagle, which was an endangered species, is so near and dear to the patriotism of the Republican Party, why did they not spark up on this issue of gutting the Endangered Species Act? You know, we have a regular guest on the shows. My name is Julian Gorbach. He's a journalist. He's at the journalism program at UA. He says, all of these issues are unimportant compared to the most important story of our life, which persists and continues and gets worse every day. Can you guess what he's talking about? It was the hottest July in history. That's it, yeah. And 200 billion tons of ice have melted in Greenland. That's why he wants to buy Greenland instead of Puerto Rico. I know it. But you know, maybe you should buy Puerto Rico because they have no tax there. He won't need any other fancy tax legislation to escape taxes if he moves his residence to Puerto Rico. Oh, he can go there. I'm okay with that. That may be a true statement. They won't take him, is right. After the way he treated them. Back to climate change. Climate change should always be a part of our discussion.  Literally the hottest July in the history of our planet since they started measuring the heat. Since they started doing the measuring. And he's doing nothing about it. In fact, he's making it worse. And his friends are making it worse.  His oil and gas buddies are making it worse. That is the most incredible thing of all. And he's demoralized the whole climate change movement. Well, he's wrapped these issues into the liberal, the liberals taking care of the planet. That's a liberal issue. Taking care of their national parks. Those liberals want to make sure I can't get my oil companies in there to develop to take care of the endangered species. Wow, that's certainly a liberal issue. So he's very, very forcefully defined every issue that should be a nonpartisan issue into a liberal issue. And they just, yeah, that's a liberal issue. Now I'm against it. Yeah, it politicized even science.  And of all, I mean, it's double think again. It's alternative facts. But the reality is we have the hottest summer. And when you think of heat and energy that way, when you think of carbon emissions that way, you know that the flip side of all that is extreme weather. And it's coming. And it's going to destroy cities. And he takes it one step further, the USDA. Remember how he moved them from a place that, you know, in Washington where they had a say, they had a seat at the table, all of that. He moved to the agency somewhere in the middle of nowhere, Kansas, I think, something like that. And yeah, and so all of these scientists, the USDA guys, right, are, they don't want to move to Kansas. And so they're quitting. And then, and who was it that said, that worked out really well? We didn't actually have to fire them. They just quit. See how good that worked. And I can't believe what I'm listening to. These are scientists. So this is our food we're talking about. These aren't just, you know, these sort of lofty ideas of climate change. This is what we eat every day is no longer going to be studied in the way that it was. I'll tell you, billions of people will be killed in this process. Yes, they will. And so the question I put to you is, you know, we've talked about his boorishness. This is clear for a long time, even way back when, including misogyny. We've talked about the strange remarks he makes, which make you wonder about the process in his mind. We talked about his promises that are empty and he nevertheless doubles down. How he creates racism and divisiveness every day and every way in order to hold on to his base, I guess. What about him? What about the end of the story? When the newscasters get on and say he's probably going to win next year, I really, that's when I get up and go to the refrigerator. I have to. I have to soothe my concern. Stress eating is not a good thing. But let's not forget the projection element of what he does. And I try to really look at everything he says through that lens. If he accuses somebody else of doing it, then he probably has been the one who did it. That's because you're smart and we can figure that out. But what about the base? They don't figure that out. We think when he doubles down, he's right. I'm not sure they want to figure it out. Again, we've set this on countless shows. We're dealing with a population, and I don't know if 35% or 40%. They don't care because they're dealing with a cult of personality. If he tells them to take a jump off a short pier, they'll do it. Well, it'll be suicidal. I mean, for them, they'll do it. The thing about it is that there's a tipping point. I believe I want to be optimistic about it. The tipping point, the economy crashes and we have a dust bowl in the Midwest. It's very base-oriented place. The farmers just go completely out of business. There isn't anything. They can't grow anything. We have, oh gee whiz, we have wars and troubles everywhere in the world. Our relationship with China leads them to, as you have suggested, to not renew their bond holdings with us. There's all kinds of things that are happening. So it's climate change. It's the economy. It's all the promises that never happened. It's a world of disorder which will hurt us and touch us in so many ways. Where's the tipping point? When's the newscaster going to come on and say, he's not going to win? He's messed it up. He's going to win because he's going to cheat. I keep saying this over and over. He's going to cheat. He will sit himself in the White House and say, oh no, there must have been voter fraud or, and this is what I'm kind of thinking, why he doesn't want this election security to happen? Because then he can't manipulate it as well. I was watching the Election Security Commission hearings that happened yesterday, a big giant one. And there was so much said about, you know that all of our voting machines are Windows 7? It's like Windows 10 is already out for a long time. It's been Windows 10. So no wonder that 12-year-old kid could hack our voting machines so easily. And she did it in less than 20 minutes even, and we've done nothing to change that. To have Congress do nothing. But let's turn to gun control because just 48 hours ago, there was another attack. It was barely a week after the ones in the, El Paso and Dade Dade. So now we have in Philadelphia, we have a guy, actually a bunch of guys, who had some pretty strong weaponry and held the police off and killed, not killed, but wounded. Six of them, yeah. Luckily, they didn't kill him. But it would have been killed just as easily.  And yet, and yet, you know, what Trump and your friend, is in a conch? Moscow Mesh. I say Moscow Mesh. My bud, Moscow Mesh. I say your friend because I know he's not my friend. Hey, the names stuck, too. It seems to have stuck. They want to put it off. They want to kick it down the road. Don't want any gun control. I find this completely irrational and unresponsive to the wish of most people in the country, even Republicans. And yet, the reality is, there is no gun control, no bill, no legislation. Deja Vu all over again, as a famous sports figure said. And it's the same thing that, yeah, thank you. It's Parkland all over again. Trump's saying, we're going to do changes. We're going to make changes to this. We're going to have effective gun control. Well, he's great when he makes these statements, but why would anyone ever believe him? He doesn't mean what he says. He just doesn't mean it.  They're telling him what to do. He's not telling them what to do. It's amazing, even though they're in disarray. It's amazing how much power they still retain when they're in disarray. It's extraordinary. And not only the organization itself, but their base, you know what I mean? The people who belong, they're all gone. Why? Do they really need to have guns? It's so important to them. They need to have people shooting at the police. You know, the thing about shooting at the police, different. Different they don't pass out different than Dayton, different than the school shootings. Most people, you know, were soft targets in those places. Right. They couldn't shoot that. You know, even if one of them had a gun because he was a Second Amendment person and he carried around a sidearm, they'd use it. You know, at the end of the day, those guys with the sidearms are chicken. They're not going to turn around and risk themselves. They're going to run. Well, plus they made it very confusing. How are the police supposed to know who the real shooter is if you've got and people running around with their own guns? That's a really good point. You know, if you have everybody shooting it up, it's what's the term? It's the okay corral. Nobody knows who to shoot at. Right. So it's not a good idea to arm everybody in the shot. That's because they're going to protect each other. They're not going to protect each other. Anyway, we have kids. We have people in the shopping center. All these soft targets. These are cops. These guys were shooting at cops willy-nilly. It's different. And it tells you a couple things. One is, how do you protect yourself if the cops can't protect themselves? Two is, it says, you want to be a cop? Yeah, we were serving a warrant on the guy too when the shooting broke out, right? Somehow the people they were serving the warrant on were excited by the fact there had been all there has been all these shootings around. They fell right in the knit. This country is becoming fascinated with not only guns, but active shooters. It's a scenario that repeats and repeats. Well, they're fascinated with automatic weapons, you know, that are designed for war. And maybe they're thinking of the great apocalypse is around the corner and they need those rifles to... Didn't Lindsey Graham just say this just a couple of days ago? He may need his AR-15 to, you know, stem off massive invasions due to a natural disaster. What? He said it a couple of days ago. A slick AR-15. I may need my AR-15 in case there's a natural disaster and I have to protect my homestead. I mean, I don't know, I can't make this stuff up guys. It's not going to help the electronic invasion by the Russians, which is probably happening right now. You know that they just said they've got all these tanks and they've got all these aircraft that are already loaded and are right on the Russia border that's just across from Alaska. And then let's not forget about Venezuela. They've got those two big nuke carrying planes down there and they are on both sides of us already right now. But Russia's a friend. Yeah. They're bringing to his base. Yeah. They're our friends now. Of course they are. They're willing to put... Okay, and that's the other thing. This whole thing with Moscow Mitch and his little, you know, six or eight billion dollar, eight hundred billion dollar, whatever deal it was. Hundreds of millions. It was a lot. It was the benefit of Kentucky, right? Through Daripaska's company, Yursal or Rusal, Rusal. Rusal. Right? Okay. This is one of the things that I read in the New York Times that I thought was a fascinating article about how they have gone and done... It's an economic invasion is what they do so that then they can exert pressure from inside. Like, and this whole thing with, you know, Moscow Mitch is the perfect example of that. They have done it all over Europe. It's not like they're just learning how to do it now here in America. They had practiced it. They've got it down to a fine art. They have been out and interfering with public policy and everything else all throughout Europe. Voting and dissent and divisiveness in every country. Everywhere. And it's economic. And that's the new way that they are really going after. It's called political action campaigns. It's called money. It's called money in Washington, DC. Yep. It's that simple. Or Kentucky. What they're doing in Europe, they're doing here. They're doing everywhere. They're doing everywhere. They haven't really gotten to be experts.  Liberals like they get angry, stand up and say no more. And talk about the next debate and how that's looking. I guess Tulsi didn't make the grade. But Tom Steyer says he's really a promising guy. I saw him speak and where was it? Boise. He was fabulous. But where is it going with the Democrats? This is the last question. Where is it going with Democrats? What does it look like? Is there a leader emerging? Looks like the numbers are Biden and Elizabeth Warren. Warren's number two now. She's moving right up. And I don't resist thinking that maybe they could be a great ticket together because what one doesn't have, maybe the other one does. What do you think? Yeah. I said it about two shows ago. This is the John McCain issue because of Biden's age. Warren would not be the best pick because there are many people that said, well, we'll say I can't see her as president. And if she's only a heartbeat away from that office, this is why John McCain lost the presidency. They couldn't see Sarah Palin as the next president of the United States. I think comparing Palin and Warren is unkind. How do you do her? Okay, I'll grant you that. I will agree to that. However, there are independents and even Republicans are begging for somebody else they could pick besides Trump. They're begging for it. You've got one, but they don't like it. And Warren wouldn't be that person. Okay, maybe someone else. Well, let's see how it shakes out. But she is number two. He's number two now, which I think is okay. The age factor is why I don't think that two of them would make a good ticket. Now, see the ticket I'd like to see is Warren as president and maybe Beto O'Rourke as her second. He's off the chart. He tried to relaunch, but it's... I don't know. I didn't like his relaunch thing as well. But are somebody young at any rate? Someone young, girl, because that's one of the big things with millennials right now is everybody's too old. Okay, bottom line is we don't have anybody who really comes to mind as the guy could leave us out of the Trump swamp and beat him. And secondly, we don't have anything that attracts people from the middle or from the conservatives. Correct. This is a problem. Yes. So we need to be stimulated. The country needs to be stimulated. And I'm so worried that for the lack of that, Trump will win because he's real focused on Trump. He's just going to cheat himself. He's got to stop making the assumption that, let's say, Biden is our nominee. I wouldn't make the assumption he's going to pick someone from the field of cannabis. I think he might pick someone completely different. He picks someone completely outside the field. That's true. I'm thinking about that. Watch Tom Steyer. And when we get back next week, we're going to take a closer look at Tom Steyer with Tim Apachele, Cynthia Sinclair. You're on Trump Week, one of our best favorite shows. All right. Aloha. Aloha, Jay. Yeah.


Next question is from Lisa J. Kennedy, 75. Do deadlifts give you a thicker midsection? I love doing them and have gained a great deal of strength in my back from them. However, as a female, I worry that my midsection is thicker as a result. This is another one of these myths that are out there.  This one really makes me upset. So first of all, you don't want to look at the extreme top lifters of any sport and look at their physique and judge their physique and say, oh, that's why their physique necessarily looks that way. First off, people who can deadlift ungodly amounts of weight naturally probably already have thicker waist, okay? And eat tons of... Many of them may be on anabolic steroids. There's lots of muscle being built. Here's the deal. If you want a smaller waist, get leaner. Even if you develop the muscles around your waist, you're not going to develop a much thicker waist. You might get, I don't know, a couple centimeters of thickness around in terms of lean muscle around the waist, but you're going to appear leaner and more sculpted. This myth makes me upset because people tend to neglect training the muscles around the core like the obliques because they're afraid they're going to get a thicker waist. And what ends up happening is they lose function. They lose strength. And the truth is if you're lean, your waist is going to be small.  I think this is like... I think of when I was competing, we were constantly focusing on building my shoulders and the width of my back to give this illusion that my waist is smaller, even though my waist wasn't technically really shrinking. If you are training the obliques, your training exercises that may even thicken... Who cares if it puts on a quarter inch on your waist, but puts three inches on the width of your back. The ratio, when you look in the mirror or somebody else looks at you, will look as if your waist is smaller. And it'll look more shapely, too. Man, adding a half inch to your waist of muscle is a lot, by the way. People don't realize that doesn't happen. Those are exaggerated numbers. It's very, very unlikely you would even do that. But I'm saying even if you did do that, it's a lot easier to add that width to the top of your body to the tops of your shoulder caps and the width of your back. So as long as that ratio either stays the same or it increases because you've built your back up and your shoulders, it's going to give the illusion of your waist being even tiny or small. I also think there's a point to address here about training width and without the belt. Sal, you talk a lot about training with a belt. You train your core and midsection to do something different than what you do if you train without a belt.   If you always wear a belt when you deadlift, you actually train the core to push out. So if you are concerned about your waist looking smaller, staying tighter, staying in, that's a suggestion I would have also is don't deadlift with a belt all the time. Deadlift without a belt. Train your TVA to draw in and actually shrink your waist versus using a belt where you're pushing your waist out against the belt. Yeah, this is an interesting one because it keeps getting perpetuated. I'll hear this even from Courtney sometimes about doing something too often that will promote like a boxier kind of look that I've heard this is a common concern with a lot of females that I've trained even. Again, to the point that you're not going to be building, it's really difficult to build like a substantial amount of size in your core to begin with. Most of the ways that you're going to train your core are going to be to brace and so everything is working its way to protect and it's essential for you to work in that area to have that function because if you're still working out, that's really what's protecting you and that's what's keeping everything moving forward in the right direction long-term. So to neglect that area, you're going to run into all kinds of problems down the road and honestly, there are different styles of training that will produce different looks. I know you guys speak to this a lot more from the aesthetic side in terms of being able to focus on bringing up and developing other muscles to then balance the overall aesthetic to provide whatever that sort of v-taper or whatever you guys call it, kind of look, they're going for. It's just a problem because this has created a market for corsets and for all these really horrible ideas that people are still gravitating towards that because they're not considering the body as a whole. It's silly, it's silly. You know what's funny too? Considering the muscles that you develop and the muscles that women and men want to develop, the deadlift is an excellent phenomenal exercise for women. Oftentimes, female clients would say they want to develop their hamstrings and their glutes. They'd like well-developed lower backs so if you want to stand up tall in a bikini, not just have good glutes but have that nice lower back where you see the indentation come in a little bit, that's deadlifts. I've never trained any female ever who got really good at deadlifts and I don't like the way my body looks. They've all fallen in love with the deadlift so this is so silly to me. This is a myth perpetuated by extreme bodybuilding in which case I would not take much of their advice because it doesn't apply to most people. In fact, it's unhealthy advice. For most people, men and women... It's even bad for bodybuilding. I used to scoff at all my peers that thought this way. I deadlifted all the way up into competition day. Yeah. And to your point about the back, the DNA looks kind of like abs on your back. So doing things like deadlifting gives you this great definition. It creates those canals and that little dip. So even if it added again a quarter inch to your waist, you'll have this illusion of it dipping in and being more aesthetically pleasing so don't eliminate that exercise and fear of adding a little bit to your waist. That's a ridiculous notion that's been perpetuated way too long. Yeah, I think they're canals. Is the canals or canals? Let's go with canals. Canals? Canals. More of a now. It's like pilau, pilau. I got my lisp in going on over here. Yeah, yeah. Put that in the library.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com coming at you with 2021 Panini Chronicles draft picks football getting a random college football team This is break number six We sell 16 spots and everyone gets five teams from that big list below and all car chip now Did a little early bird special right here if you're one of the first 10 spots purchased in this break You get a chance to win an extra spot So let's go over here here the first 10 With a chance to win that extra spot So here's some new dice There's the list of 10 right there Let's roll it and randomize it Four and a two six times name on top extra spot the early bird catches the delicious worm one two three four five and six Name on top after six times TJ Congrats to you teach after six times The early bird catches the worm. All right, so now There's one there is two three four and five One spot gets you five. So let's copy all those names Don't put them into a new Spreadsheet there a new tab on the spreadsheet right there. So now let's randomize names and colleges After eight times for both lists five into three one two three four five six seven And eighth and final time Karen all the way down to Ryan and then five into three eight times for the colleges one two three four five six seven And eighth and final time after eight. We got the Mississippi State Bulldogs All the way down to the Boston College Eagles All right, so I'm going to show you just the list itself just as is and then I'll alphabetize by your first names And then group your teams that way But first I just want to get just the randomizer as is Just on tape on wax. All right, so for example who has Clemson right here, right? So that's a Anthony Congrats Clemson for you So now let's go to the top of the list alphabetized by your first names You can see that Anthony still has Clemson So Anthony that that's your group of teams right there pretty nice David your group of teams last spot mojo star next to your name Dwayne John BYU right there Josh Karen Matthew Randall Ryan's got a lot of teams here and the rest of your teams Ryan TJ, they're your teams And your early bird teams There you go. I'm gonna pause the video when we come back We're gonna see if there's any trades and then we'll have the break stick around All right. Welcome back everybody. There were no deals done. So let's Let's do this Chronicles draft picks for autographs or memorabilia cards per box on average. All right. Thanks everybody for the fill See what you can get out of here All right, there's it for our first Trevor Lawrence and we got it puka Williams, Jr For Kansas that's gonna be It's gonna be for Karen Anthony had Clemson he'll get all those Trevor Lawrence's Zach Wilson that flux design BYU That was John Ricketts. We'll get all the Zach Wilson's is Wilson's I will s will sigh. There's Mack Jones more Trevor Lawrence more Trevor Lawrence more Trevor Lawrence and All of those add up to there's grading possibilities here. I'm sure some of the Some of the different designs will sell better than the other ones, but but everything will ship. So that should be pretty a Lot of grading opportunities, which should be really nice The prestige Trevor Lawrence great photography there And let's see what let's see what Mack Jones is gonna do Out there in New England that goes to Alabama David Razor with the Alabama Crimson Tide And we've got a another score auto that is Marquez Stevenson Rookie auto He's out of Houston and that is gonna be is it under Houston or University of Houston? Where's H? Is Houston not on this list? Oh, there it is Can't read Ryan Redman With the Houston Cougars. All right next group here Travis Etienne Najee Harris, and we've got Anthony Swartz Rookie autograph for Auburn That's gonna go to Ryan Redman and the Auburn Tigers Some Elijah Moore is a Monroe St. Browns more Elijah Moore Trask There's a Mack Jones Another one for Alabama. That's gonna go to David And the Mack Jones illusions design more Mack Jones and a Kyle Trask In case design relics substantial rookie swatches Florida John Ricketts with the Florida Gators nice Kyle Trask, he'll be I guess Being the apprentice behind Tom Brady and Tampa Bay. There's Devonta Smith for Alabama Mack Jones, does he does he start this here? Probably would at some point. All right, that was the first box Second box. All right, let's see what we got here Now there's some Justin Fields now Ohio State David Razer has the OSA Buckeyes More Trevor Lawrence's It's Trevor Lawrence in that status design looks looks really sharp. You know nice Justin Fields as well I feel like for Mack Jones and Justin Fields. I think I don't think they'll be week one guys Like I feel like Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson are week one guys, right? I think Mack Jones Justin Fields maybe A little bit later in the season. They may need a little more marinating. There's Brevin Jordan Rated rookie autograph for Miami That's John Ricketts in the Miami Hurricanes Rock you like a hurricane Justin Fields And Justin Fields in that prestige design I think uh, not too long ago I think Dick Sporting Goods was saying that That nationwide Justin Fields jerseys Are the hottest rookie jersey. There's Elijah Moore for Ole Miss And that'll be for Randall some Trey Lance And we got a Ardarius Washington went to TCU That's gonna be a horned frog for Karen Oh, yeah, that's another that's the the other quarterback Tristan's wondering when Trey Lance When will he see meaningful snaps? Yeah, I don't think he's a week one guy either Trey Lance There he is Who's got North Dakota? TJ has North Dakota State. You'll be getting all these Trey Lances Yeah, I suppose as long as Jimmy G stays healthy and is relatively effective. They'll keep rolling with him But generally speaking all those quarterbacks, I don't know. I think they want to I mean, this is what everyone says, but I think they certainly want to try to Have Trey Lance marinate for as long as possible But yeah, the first Jimmy G injury or the first Jimmy G for interception game There's Patrick Surtain For David That's when you'll start to see maybe this guy in action and maybe takes the job doesn't look back Same with Justin Fields I think they're gonna they'll probably have Annie Dalton just kind of go with it week one or two one and two, but The first four interception game from Annie Dalton You know, that's when you'll probably start to see Justin Fields Get in and maybe he takes the job and doesn't look back. All right two boxes to go But this could turn out to be a pretty Pretty incredible quarterback class, right? Yeah, Gilo. Yeah bears aren't desperate for a quarterback, but they can't they can't afford to rush Justin Fields and then You know and you risk ruining them Yeah, Fields is probably yeah, I don't know. Maybe Maybe Fields you'll probably see within a few weeks Yeah, Trey Lance Niners are probably good enough To get away with not forcing Trey Lance into action Until they have to You know, I think New England will keep Rolling with Cam Newton As long as they can not rush Mac Jones into action. There's Dylan Moses otherwise Trey Lance or otherwise, uh Trevor Lawrence and Zach Wilson are probably weak one guys though There's Dylan Moses for Alabama. That's for David. There's more Trey Lance. There's Justin Fields And that Trey Lance is to 99 We've got a full coverage relic Rashad Bateman Minnesota and that'll be John Ricketts with the Golden Gophers But who's their other quarterback Gilo? You have three quarterbacks There's a Mac Jones number to 149 Jamar Chase rated rookie hollow another Patrick Surtain autograph more Justin Fields Is Penae Sewell a guy to hold on to? I mean He's all indications say he's supposed to be You know a future Hall of Famer. He'll be in the league for 15 years or whatever But offensive linemen you know They don't they don't I don't really resell very well On the secondary market most of them anyway But I don't know. Maybe maybe he's the one that changes everything. There's Anthony Schwartz for Auburn That's gonna go to Ryan Redman. They still have Nick Foles on that roster. I thought they Thought they traded him. He's got to be traded, right? Before camp or during camp The second a team has like an unfortunate quarterback injury either to their starter or backup Someone's picking up Nick Foles, right? Someone's trading for Nick Foles. All right, and the last box Yeah, last box. Maybe we'll see a Trevor Lawrence autograph in here Good luck. Justin Fields. There's a D on Jackson select in-flight autograph for Duke That's gonna be Anthony with Duke 5 out of 10 nice low number there Nagy said said that uh A few weeks ago that Dalton was the starter and that Field is ahead of Foles Yeah, what are they doing hanging on to Foles then? I mean, maybe they're waiting for the right deal, but Yeah, Travis Etienne on that Jaguar's team Tristan saying if he's used right They are early reports where they are having him lineup as wide receiver to us or getting some reps there There's uh Kenneth Gainwell for Memphis. Memphis Tigers It's gonna be Matthew Hedges Devonta Smith to 149. There's more Trey Lance And we've got a Amari Rogers for Clemson Yeah, Amari Rogers is uh is in Green Bay with Aaron Rogers Anthony again with Clemson. Sorry, Trey Lance Tyler Tyler Vaughn's right here for USC Not South Carolina, but Southern California That'll be for TJ and the Trojans That's the Tyler Vaughn's autograph Nico Collins to 149 for Michigan A lot of Justin Fields here too Once again, Ohio State is David Razer getting all the Justin Fields is I think TJ has North Yeah, TJ is North Dakota. He's getting all the Trey Lances Rondale Morda 99 and we've got we've got uh Training camp starting pretty soon what few weeks for the NFL It's gonna be we're gonna have to start studying for the draft for a fantasy team It's gonna be draft time before you know it KJ Costello Score autograph Mississippi State It's gonna go to Karen and the Mississippi State Bulldogs Trevor Lawrence. We got an XR Justin Fields A Larry Roundtree a rated rookie Trey Lance We got that illusion Zach Wilson as well And BYU That is John Ricketts With the Zach Wilson Thanks, everybody. That was another great break of Chronicles draft picks football four box random college break number six I'm Joe. I'll see you next time for the next one on jazviescasebreaks.com


The hateful star had lost track of when they'd stopped observing it. Frankly, it didn't really care. Let them try to ignore it. Keep it contained in a web of silence. It wouldn't help them when the end came. And come it did. As the star lazily and messily tore Pluto apart, it noticed to its consternation that the earth was no longer inhabited. It hadn't bothered checking until now, but there it was. Enthusiasm considerably dampened, the star hoved sunwards, briskly dispatching planets as it went. It came to a halt quite close to the planet, reaching out with lines of force to keep the little world from being torn apart by its gravity well. Satisfied that it would not be disturbed, the star began to examine the little ball of dirt. It gave the stellar equivalent of a disappointed sigh. The little mud hole wasn't doing too well. It wasn't just the broken, drifting orbital gantries that surrounded the place like a messy halo. They'd drain the oceans, too, and the cities were radioactive craters, some of them still smoldering with the energies of sundered atoms.  I mean, I knew you liked to foul your own nest, but this is just disgusting! It pulsed to itself, looking a little closer. Ah, now that was odd. They'd released all the SCPs, lost control of them more like. Those overconfident simpletons at the Foundation had finally got what was coming to them. The red pool was the size of Madagascar, and yes, that was 682 roaming the scorched sandpit that was Australia. The lizard looked up as the star's mind passed over it. The star contemptuously reduced it to vapor, then kept searching, its awareness passing over the few remaining cities and digging deep into the earth, searching for sites long forgotten. It saw 173, the statue, only the faintest blurs it roamed the crazed hallways of a broken containment facility. The star paused briefly in what had once been the massively reinforced containment chamber holding 076's sarcophagus. The black stone was cracked and shattered, and near the base someone had written a short message in white spray paint. We're cool now, pretentious and childish. Now I'm just disappointed. The facility vanished in an eruption of energy, and the star moved on. It paused one final time over the once Pacific Ocean, seeing something unusual in the burnt seabed. A stone tablet, easily a kilometer square, with writing carved into its surface in a dozen languages. First, a series of stellar coordinates in the primitive system the humans were so fond of using. Then, a short message. Observe, then destroy this marker. The star moved away from the earth, exasperately throwing its mind into the void. What exactly was it supposed to be observing? Will I find you? And then it found them. The faintest wash of energy emissions, redshifted so far they were practically invisible.  NO! The hateful star tore at the marker, revealing a second message. Concrete letters buried in the sand beneath. Einstein was wrong. Catch us if you can. An end. Or maybe this is how it ended. What exactly was it supposed to be observing? First, it saw only a splotch of redshifted light, moving away slowly. A fleet, one capable of carrying an entire species.  The star crushed the earth like an insect, collapsed the core of the sun, and then leisurely began to accelerate towards the distant ships. It mustered its energies, settling in for the slow path to 0.85C. Much, much faster than what humanity was managing. Then it noticed something strange, a pale blue dot in the center of the red cloud. Blue shifted light, moving towards it. For the first time in aeons, it felt itself being observed. A burst of malevolent hatred washed over it, radiating from- From the thing heading directly towards it, the star faltered in its acceleration. It hadn't experienced anything like this before. How fast was that little dot moving? The blue light flickered, speaking a language the star knew all too well. Morse. Russian. Pick on someone your own size. The star began to accelerate in the opposite direction when the realization hit it. The little blue dot was at 0.86C, and it was speeding up. Site 42 is able to continue broadcasting and move up to live action SCP film adaptations due to the support of viewers, subscribers, and especially our patrons. Special shout out to our Site Director level patron, Andrei Beichert.