Good morning, everybody, and welcome to this spring colloquium session presented by the School of Library and Information Science at San Jose State. I'm Bill Fisher. I'm on the faculty, and I coordinate the colloquium program for the school. And again, I want to welcome everyone here today, and I want to also thank the school's ACIS student chapter in the school's SLA student chapter that are co-sponsoring our presentation today. We have with us two presenters talking about their experience in offering a course last semester using a MOOC, and our first presenter that I'll introduce is Michael Stevens, who's also on the faculty at SLIS, full-time faculty member, came to San Jose State in fall of 2011. And Michael's teaching focus is on user-centered services and outreach using technology and also learning programs in library settings. In addition to his work that we'll hear about in just a few minutes, he's done a great deal of work in other avenues of technology in library settings. He is also the project director for the Salzburg Curriculum Initiative, which is an IMLS-funded project, and Michael speaks both across the country. He was in Texas last week at the Texas Library Association meeting, giving the presentation as well as internationally, and his I think most recent international trip was in New Zealand this past fall speaking to the New Zealand Library Association there. Michael, if you want to say hello, please. Hello, everybody. Thank you for coming. Thank you. Great. And with Michael today, his co-presenter will be Kyle Jones, who also co-taught the course that will be the focus of our presentation today. Kyle is currently a PhD student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and teaches, you know, on topics related to digital tools, trends, and controversies. He's done a number of things with Michael as well as on his own. And he's currently researching information, ethics, and privacy issues in American higher education institutions. Kyle, would you say hello, please? Sure. Hey, everybody. I'm really happy to be here, and I'm so thrilled that we have alums. We have guest lecturers. This is going to be a great get-together. So thanks for taking the time to join us. Great. Thank you. And as Kyle's mentioned, we've got a great mix of individuals. Online right now, and I suspect some other people will join us soon. So let me turn things over to Michael and Kyle, and let them start their presentation. And we'll save questions for the end, and we should have time for some interaction with both our speakers at that point. Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Bill. Thanks for starting us off. Again, hello, everybody. I'm Kyle Jones, and I will start the beginning of our presentation today talking a little bit about the technology side of things. But here's our agenda going forward. We'll give you a brief overview. We'll talk about the bespoke environment, learning environment that we built custom for our MOOC. We'll talk a little bit about the MOOC experience, which is coming out of some survey data that we gathered, some pre- and post-survey data. Some roles for LIS professionals, again, based on a paper that Michael and I wrote. We'll talk a little bit about what has happened after the HyperLib MOOC, which has really taken Michael and I by surprise. There's been a great community and just enthusiasm still for the MOOC that's continued. And then we'll talk a little bit about some next steps going forward in terms of research, in terms of future endeavors we want to do, including HyperLib MOOC 2.0, so let's talk about that a bit. So actually I should just go back to, we'll just talk about the overview real quick. So last fall we taught a MOOC, I guess more of a smaller to median sized MOOC of about 360, 363 students focused on Michael's hyperlinked library model that he's been working on and teaching for a number of years. And so we did that by using a bespoke environment. And by bespoke environment, I mean a one-off custom environment where we did not rely on learning management systems, traditional learning management systems like Moodle or Canvas, nor did we go to Coursera to host our MOOC. This is something that we developed all on our own. So I'll walk you through all of those different steps and some affordances of the system. But first I want to start with a quotation by Peter Moorville that I love. It's something that I like to use when I'm talking about web design, specifically web design for instructional experiences, learning experiences. And Peter Moorville said that the LMS Information Architecture shapes the quality of the academic experience. And I just can't stress this enough, I've worked, I've built these custom systems for learning experiences before and I've worked in a support role for librarians and faculty alike in their online learning courses. And I can't really state enough that what you put into the architecture of the LMS really defines in part, I think in a great part, the experiences of students, the learning experience, the community experience, and the relationship building that goes on between students and instructors. And so it's one of the things that's really motivated me in this project is saying, I have this blank canvas, what can I do with it to really be an architect of learning to shape the academic experience in such a way that gets to certain learning outcomes and gets to certain learning experiences. So we decided to roll our own or build our own bespoke environment using one foundational technology, WordPress, and then building on top of that the BuddyPress plugin, which goes on to it. So WordPress is a custom or a content management system. Primarily it's known for blogging, but as Pauli knows, one of our visitors, who's one of my co-authors on a lot of WordPress articles, WordPress can do a lot more than just blogging. And it has been able to do a lot more than just blogging for a number of years now. But as of late, it's really come into its own of being a very good community, like a local community type environment. And what enables that community type environment is the BuddyPress plugin that goes into it, and it's a comprehensive plugin. I'll talk about all the affordances of it moving forward. And if you want to, please play along at home. Go to mooc.hypalib.sgsu.edu. Thanks, Michael, for putting in the link. All the content is still up, including all the student content, all the course content, all the lectures, all the guest lectures, all the reading materials, everything. It's still up there. You're more than welcome, and you're more than encouraged. I mean, you're encouraged to go and take a look and see for yourself what exactly we did, what exactly we built, and if you read through some of the student blogs and posts, you'll get an idea of what their experience was like and what they took away from it. I'm not going to say it's a complete snapshot of everything. I think some students may have gone in there and deleted their blogs or their accounts, which they're free to do, but feel free to go in and take a look. So I want to talk a little bit about the community spaces in this course site, because we took a CMOOC approach in contrast with an ex-MOOC approach. And what I mean by that is that a CMOOC approach is supposed to be very community-centered. It's supposed to be emphasizing knowledge creation and connected learning among peers and by peers instead of what the ex-MOOC does, which is really the traditional, I guess, kind of MOOC that we have now, where the Coursera style MOOC is that it's the stage on the stage approach. The, I am the instructor and therefore I'm going to lecture at you and you're going to take all of the knowledge that I have given to you and then in some form give it back to me. That's not what we wanted to do. We wanted an environment that would be community-centered and that would encourage students to make, to go through their own sense-making processes and engage each other in those. And so there are what I think are three main community spaces. The first is the personal space and that's where students have a blog. They have a student profile. It's more about them, but it means, but it still means that the community can come and see who they are and engage with them in their own blog posts. The second community space is the course space. And this is where a lot more of the community features come in. And I'll talk about the tribes, which are synonymous with groups. I'll talk about the homerooms a little bit. This is where you see all the rest of the peers in the course and the activity updates. And then you have this third space, which is the global community. And the space that really, as we talk about in a paper we just submitted, really came together organically from the most part. Students, you know, carried the conversations onto Twitter. They created their own groups and Goodreads and in Facebook. And they shared some of their credentials that they earned in the course using the Creadlead Badges system. All right. So some brief statistics about the course. I mean, we had two instructors. We had nine guest lecturers, of which one is with us, Michael Casey. Thank you, Michael, so much again if I haven't said it already. I know Michael has, but perhaps I haven't. Thank you so much for your participation. No, you rock, Michael. We had 363 registered students. We had about 310 blogs. So you can see there that there's a little bit of a discrepancy. Not everybody chose to blogging. That's okay. We had 10 homerooms, about 4,000 blog comments, and nearly, you know, 3,800 badges unlocked, status updates up to 2,080 tribes and groups. So we had a lot of activity. And I think what's important here is that there's diversity of activity. In other MOOC environments, the activity is pretty central to the discussion forums. And that's the place to go, you respond, you interact with your peers. And one of the goals that we had going into this is that we wanted to design a space that would allow individuals to find their own niche in the course environment and be able to interact with students however they chose, and not be forced into a certain box of learning. So activity-based learning. And what we mean by this is that we wanted the life of the course environment or the activity of the course environment to be front and center. So everybody could post updates, a lot like a Facebook update or a Twitter update. And they could post those updates in the tribes. So those updates could be shown as regular activity updates or profile updates. They could be shown as comments that have gone on throughout the site when people join a tribe or group, when they add posts to those tribes or groups, when they become friends, et cetera. And you can see that all of those different activity types kind of in that drop-down box in the screenshot. And what this shows here is the main activity page of the website. So this is like the central hub of content that's being aggregated in one area. So I could, if this were a live page, I could scroll down and see, you know, what I've said, what Ben said, maybe what Polly said or Margaret keep on scrolling down. And I could comment, you know, just to write on to that activity post. And so, okay, so here's a really good example. If I were to scroll down, you can see that, you know, Vicki wrote a new post and that post is in this central aggregated area. And I did a little bit of a snapshot about what she said. And if I want to read more of it, I can click on her blog or I can go directly to the post. I can also favorite it, et cetera. It says I can delete it just because I'm in there as an administrator right now. You can see that Sally did comment on a post and that Julie unlocked a badge. So it's a great example of, I think, a really good design for one. Because the problem with a lot of CMooks style MOOCs is that they tend to create a lot of content in a lot of different areas and the hard part is getting them aggregated, getting all that content aggregated into one central location. And so, our activity feature really allowed us to do that, which assisted with community development. As was indicated in the surveys, the post course surveys. So we had blog based learning, like we said. A lot of students were encouraged, actually all students were encouraged to create a blog. If you were going for a certificate, which we did offer, the SJSU Certificate of Completion, one of the required assignments was to blog. So you can see that in this blog directory page, I can get an idea of all of the different people who are blogging, get an idea of what their latest post was and click right into it. And one of the things that I know Michael and I like to talk about when we use blogs in our classroom experiences or online teaching experiences, rather, is that blogs become a part of the student's identity. And I say that because, I mean, we have a great example here with Edo, or Edo, who put not only his face in the header of the blog, but he also put the logo of his library where he works. And so this is just a small part of identity formation. And students could do much more than just change the header image. They could change the theme. They could change all the widgets. They could change the colors. And it sounds very simple and it sounds like something that's not all that important. But giving students a sense of space in an online course environment is actually very important. It's very important. It helps with engagement. It helps with community development because people know who each other are. And so that's been, as the survey data has shown, that's been a really important part of the technological features of the course site. And then, of course, each blog post has comments that are associated with it. And this is where a lot of conversations actually took off. So here was a really good example. Somebody asked, you know, is this new, is this for professional development or on your own? And I think she went on to explain her own views on it and it created a massive discussion, 55 replies. So the community-based learning, we've already talked a little bit about it. But here's a social network analysis of the groups and people's connections to the groups. Groups and individuals, I should say. So the pink circles are groups and the white circles are individuals. And so you can see two pretty big white circles in the middle. And that's Michael and myself. And then you can see the pink, larger pink circles, which are groups. And so you can see that, yeah, groups, thanks, Kate, groups are the same as tribes. I use them interchangeably. And you can see that on the outside we have some individuals who are, you know, only connected through maybe another peer or whatnot. But then we also have this central crew of individuals and groups where a lot of the activity is going on. And so the actual, the biggest group there, kind of off-center to the left is our, I think, library or resources group, which became very active in the course. We had homerooms, so I think we had 10, in the end, 10 different homerooms. Homerooms were led by either SJSU Swiss students or volunteers from other LAS programs. That became kind of the homeroom leaders. They were the people who helped people, who helped the students get comfortable, helped them answer some technical questions. They were very good conduits between ourselves, the instructors, and the larger course community. And homerooms were also advantageous for the development of the course. Here's a good example of a tribe. And these tribes are, we call them tribes based on Seth Godin. Seth Godin's concept of tribes. And a tribe is a space where an individual leads this group of people based on what he or she has an affinity for, a major interest in, and wants to lead people about a certain topic. So each student could create as many tribes as he or she wanted based on what they were interested in, and some tribes took off, you know? So this library management one had 45 peers, some tribes did not, and that's okay. That's, you know, tribes had their own life, and they had their own interest group, or they garnered interest based on the amount of activity that they tried to create and also what the topic was. So bad space learning. We also had a badge system built in to the course site, and badges are a way of recognizing students for skills and knowledge of learns. And so we had, I should step back a little bit and say that part of the development of the MOOCs started in the summer before the course began, and we had four groups of SJSU students help with four different projects. So one of those projects was doing some of the badge conceptualization. They built the badge model, and then they also built the technology behind it, and they built it into the course site. And students could earn checkpoint badges, which helped to lead towards a master badge. And those checkpoint badges were related to content, learned in the course. They were tied to activities, so writing blog posts or writing comments. And also part of the badge system was to help students get acclimated with the system. So, you know, a simple badge would be deleting a blog post. And while that's kind of silly, it's also a good way to encourage students to interact with the system and get to know it a little bit better. So here's an example of Creadly. And Creadly was, it is a web service that you can, I guess, give badges to individuals. So what we would do is we would keep a tally of who has earned what. And let's say Johnny wanted to have his badges exported out of the MOOC and brought into Creadly, then we would also award them in Creadly. So because, you know, if the MOOC site goes down, then those badges go away. But doing it through Creadly, we could award those badges and that they could have a continued life and students could share them greater and greater ways outside of the course site. All right, so now let's step into a little bit of the research of the MOOC. So here is a good snapshot of some of the population of our MOOC. I think we did this maybe in the third or fourth week.  And so we had really an international population, which I have to admit did not sink into me until one night I was having a conversation with my mother-in-law about the course. And I was like, I taught a course for people in China and people in South America and Australia and they just really sank in that this was a very much an international teaching and learning experience, which it was amazing for me personally. And so for the surveys, we did a pre and post survey. We had 196 students complete the pre-course, 151 do the post-course and those were pretty good response rates for those. And then we coded the qualitative survey responses. So the qualitative survey responses were the open-ended text-based responses. We reviewed them, edited them, put them in a master code book. And so the findings that we'll talk about for the most part are all based on those codes that we came up with. One of the major themes that we saw was talking about what the students said their experience, their expectations were going into it. And a lot of students said that they really just wanted to understand MOOCs better. Like what is it about their design or their structure or our particular approach to the MOOC that would be interesting to them or to compare it with other experiences that they had. And additionally, a lot of students said, well, you know, what's the connection here between MOOCs and library and information science? Specifically, what could they learn from the MOOC or the MOOC experience that could help them in their own professional capacity or to share back with their employer? Of course, a lot of people also said that, you know, they wanted to take advantage of the convenience of the course, being that it was online, being that it was asynchronous, that it was easy to access, that, you know, they could take it wherever they wanted. As one of our students did, she was able to take it to the pool and listen to the lectures. So there was a lot of portability involved with the MOOC, and that's what they were expecting. But this was also an experience of lifelong learning and professional development for some people. And as Michael and I noticed, that we're in an era of shrinking professional development budgets, and we have to make some adjustments to it, and MOOCs are a very great way to do that, we think. And one of our, you know, kind of goals in this project was to demonstrate, hopefully demonstrate a successful MOOC for other LIS programs and say, here's a way that you can provide professional development to others. So, and then finally, students wanted to connect with a global course population, which as you can see from the map, that is definitely what we had. We had a, you know, not a completely representative sample of the globe, but we had a very much an international flair. Also, here's a great quote, one of the students said, it's a wonderful opportunity for professional development for my desk. There's also something uniquely intriguing about MOOCs, the Math, the Global Participation, their exploration of new virtual landscapes. And on the outs or exiting the MOOC, this is what students had to say about measuring their own success. So, they talked about their own success in terms of, you know, completion, and they judged their completion of the course based on if they viewed the lectures or all the lectures, you know, the amount of materials they read, if they completed the assignments and stuck with the courses they said to the end. And success was also based on interaction, you know, did they feel that they had actually engaged with the course community, with their peers. But unfortunately, a lot of students also said that time was not their friend, that they lacked it and that it decreased the participation or the level of participation that they could have in the course. And one of the lower codes, but still relevant, said that, you know, they talked about success in terms of if they had a knowledge of the core concepts and models, but also if they felt that they could apply them in their professional setting. Another quote from one of our students, she said, I finished the required amount of assignments, watched all of the lectures and read in overwhelming majority of the material. Also, I felt invigorated to be a librarian while taking the course. I came out of the course with real meaningful ways to make my library a better place for patrons. I know that warmed my heart and also Michael's to hear some of these comments that they were, that they had a renewed sense of invigoration and being an LIS professional. Students also reflected on what worked for them. They said, you know, the social experience, the connectedness they had with their peers, the idea that they built a professional network was important, that it worked for them, that it was, you know, as it matches their ideas coming into the course that convenience was helpful, they appreciated it, they enjoyed the content in terms of the readings and the lecture format, and the global LIS community in the course was great because it added a significant amount of diverse perspectives. And then just this last quote, I really enjoyed getting to learn from other professionals about what is going on in the larger library world rather than being only focused on my work at my individual library, which, you know, is probably what a lot of professionals feel when they have, you know, in-house professional development days or workshops that gave people a real chance to see what other people were doing and what other issues people had in a lot of different environments in LIS. So Michael, I think I'm handing it off to you at this point. Nice, cool. I've been watching the folks come in. And Kyle, thank you for that overview of the technology and the research. I realized that we have joining us here today, and I think this is very cool, one of our guest lecturers, at least one of our homeroom guides and our alums, as well as faculty and students from SLIS. So I think that's really cool to see everyone come together, and that makes me very happy. I also want to say, Michael was here, Michael Casey, he worked with information today, the publisher, to get everyone that took the MOOC a free copy of one of the texts that I use in the Hyperlink Library, and that we use in the MOOC, Michael's book, Library 2.0, a guide to participatory service. So that was very cool as well, instead of making people buy a book or whatever, we actually got to give it to them for free. I want to talk a little bit about what folks took away, sorry for this weird formatting issue, but it's what people took away from the course. And one of the things that we didn't have a great big slide on is the fact that we ask folks, do you feel you were successful? And 76% of the people that took the post survey said yes, I felt I was successful in this MOOC, so we asked them to sort of tease that out a bit. And the follow-up question, what did you, what do you think you gained the most? And here's a breakdown in order of occurrence of what folks said. Of course, they came away with new ideas and new knowledge, they got to network, which we've heard before as well. They got to network and collaborate and work with other folks. And this third one, and it was the third most prominent, but this one really sort of touched me, that they gained insights about themselves, about their learning style, about the way they might approach online learning, and just some personal reflections. And I think some folks really took that to heart, and that made me happy. And we saw this in an earlier quote that folks experienced a renewed outlook with the profession, maybe more excitement about doing their jobs. So here's one of the quotes we pulled out, seeing all the new tech in action and seeing what we can actually use it for, and realizing that it is for me and not just other people. So this person sort of had an awakening about using these technologies. Oh, so here's another quirky little slide. This is reflecting back on their expectations of what they went into the MOOC with, and then we asked them at the end to think about those things. And they said, well, I wanted to finish, but I didn't. And one of the other numbers we should throw out there for you. We did have 363 folks join us at the beginning of August. And one measure of finishing the MOOC, and I just did air quotes, was completing the certificate from San Jose SLIS, meaning you did a certain amount of things. And we gave 53 of those, which comes up to be about 15%. So a lot of other people said I wanted to finish, but something came up, life intervened, et cetera. Most felt that the MOOC exceeded their expectations. They learned about modern library practices on a global scale. And overall, most folks said it was a good experience. And this makes me happy. And I've got to tell you, this is a true representation of the data, because I'm always looking for the things where people are like, this wasn't very good, this wasn't very good, and those things did not rise to the top, as they would, and we would certainly report them if they did. Here's another quote. This person knew they wouldn't be able to get the certificate, but they wanted to try, but just things didn't work out. But I did learn a lot about participating in an online learning environment, which was a primary goal. We also took away in the various questions we asked some recommendations for going forward, and we will be offering hyperlinked library MOOC in the spring, and this is going to help us sort of, I think, put it together, kind of change it up a bit. We'll be refining the core site. We've got some really good feedback about that. We'll be reducing the workload a bit. And this is so interesting that people said in the research that they couldn't do all of the reading, and I never, ever, ever expected anybody in the MOOC to do all of the reading, but I think it might come down to that sort of personality type that a lot of us are in our profession, that we, you know, we want to do it all, we want to do it all really well. So people, if they saw a list of 20 articles, they felt they had to read them when right up at the top, Kyle and I had said, pick and choose the ones that resonate with you, or the ones that speak to you, or the ones that sit into what you're interested in. But still we might reduce that workload so people feel that it can be manageable. And then we'll be adjusting the course length as well. We went for 12 weeks, 12 weeks, and a Swiss semester is 15. So we went almost as long as a regular semester. So here is a wonderful quote, and I think Kyle, when you did this slide at a lease, you read this as though it was a haiku, I don't know if I can do that justice, but too much content for the timeframe ever increasing feelings of guilt, kind of beautiful and kind of sums up how one person felt about the amount of content we put out there. So one of the other things that we did in our post-survey is we asked people, now that you've been in a large-scale online course, what do you see as the role that you might play or that librarians might play in large-scale learning in MOOCs? And this is the neat thing that Kyle and I have been able to do, and we've been really working like crazy this winter, we got a paper out for Jealous, the Journal of Library and Information Science Education, but we also have a conference paper that we wrote, and I'm going to troop out to Denver next week and present it just on this one question at the Distance Librarian Conference in Denver. So looking at that one question, we did the content analysis on it, oops, there we go, and we found again in order of prominence that folks said, I see librarians being guides within these spaces, meaning that they show people where resources are, and they show people how to find their way through these spaces, through these learning spaces. They also see themselves as access providers, that they would provide access maybe to the MOOC, maybe to the various resources that make up the open materials that are shared via the MOOC, that they are there to do that thing that we do so well in libraries, again, to provide access. They might also be instructors to a certain degree, and that would be not necessarily teaching within the MOOC, but they might be instructing in different ways to help people satisfy the requirements of the MOOC, for example, showing someone how to make a video or something like that, and guess what, I think we dropped one of our roles here, so I will just tell you, right before this one there should have been another one that was Creator, and that was the actual creation of large-scale learning. That would be the role of librarian as MOOC Creator, where they might actually design a MOOC, maybe for example, in an academic library, you might teach a MOOC on information literacy or digital literacy or those things that you need to be a successful student. That might be an example of that. I apologize for Creator not showing up there. It's kind of quirky, but it didn't. Librarians will also be connectors, and that's putting people together, and I see this really in our MOOC and hopefully in future, C MOOCs that I'm involved in. I think this role could be very important, and that's putting, helping put groups together, helping put individuals together that enables them to learn. And then finally, the role of the learner, and this is that important thing that professional development thing that I will always continue to learn even after I have finished my degree, even after I have gone back for a postmaster certificate, that I will be a lifelong learner as an information professional. Just to say Margaret says always, always, always, absolutely. Just to say a word about this graphic, this is sort of like the point that resonates so much with me about the experience that we had last fall with the MOOC. I was in New Zealand to speak at Leanza, and we had a wonderful contingent of librarians in our MOOC from New Zealand, and one of them, Kath, came up to me in the hallway of the big conference center, and she said, I made you something. And this is what I'm taking away from the MOOC, and she had hand-painted this little heart, and it says show kindness on it, and that's a big deal. And for the students with me in Hyperlink Library right now, and I know I have a couple of you in the room, you know, this is really what we're talking about in our 15 weeks together, you know, how do we do this in our libraries and in our spaces. So, that said, let's talk a little bit about what happened after the Hyperlink Library MOOC or things that were happening as we were winding up, and then we will turn it over for questions from the group. Here's Joe, Joe Hardenbrook, who is a blogger and uses Twitter, and he put this up in December, just as around the time the MOOC was just about done, and he says not saying that Hyperlink MOOC was the reason I got a new job, but I did get questions on it during my interview. It was a great learning experience, and that really, that makes me happy. I think that's a good thing. It also speaks to the fact that this is something that if you were in the MOOC, you can talk about, and if you were a participatory learning guide, and I know Joanne's here, who was one of the guides in the MOOC, that that's something else that will go on her CV, on her resume as she looks for a job. So, I think that's a big deal. Yeah, participatory learning guide, also known as homeroom leader. And there's Joanne. Thank you, Joanne. Okay, here's Megan. Hold on to your hats, everybody. This is, this one is a hoot. So, she says, so far in the first three weeks, I've gotten more out of Hyperlink MOOC than I did out of my entire MLIS, and this time it is free. She put this up in September, retweeted a number of times, favorited a number of times. I used this slide in Texas, and somebody shot their hand up and said, what school did she go to? And I said, I'm not going to tell you. You might be able to find out. I will tell you. It certainly is not San Jose, SLIS, but Megan did get some good stuff out of the MOOC. The other thing, and this had nothing to do with Kyle and I, a hearty group of like the core active folk in the Hyperlink Library MOOC realized as we were ending that they wanted to continue being a community, and they put up a little survey. We put it up on the main MOOC blog for everybody to have access to it, and they formed a little blog community and a Facebook page, and this is a screenshot of the Facebook page for the Hyperlink Library alumni, and it actually is billed as anybody that's ever taken the Hyperlink Library class or the MOOC can join this, and I've been posting in it today promoting this event, so that's kind of cool. So they're continuing the conversation way beyond the content that Kyle and I provided, so that makes me happy as well. And one of the things that came out of that, the alumni group is Amy Padgett from Indiana, Indiana Librarian, yay, I was an Indiana Librarian for many years. Amy had the little ribbons made for your conference badge, so she passed them out at ALA midwinter. I had one, and I think she met some other folks, I know, yay Hoosiers, at midwinter, so people wore those around with their little ribbons that might say alumni, this, or I'm a blogger, I'm a speaker, and I actually wore one in Texas as well, just last week for Texas Library Association. I have a little stack of these. Amy gave me some. I will be at the ALA in Vegas, that sounds so funny to say ALA in Vegas, but I will be there, and we will be at the big SLIS reception, and I'll be passing these out, and we'll also have them at our SLIS booth, if any of the alumni here in the meeting or listening to the recording would like to have one. So what are the next steps? We'll talk just briefly, and then I'm going to open it up to questions, because I'm really interested to hear from you all. Here's where we are right now, and if you look at this, Kyle, it kind of makes me a little tired. We've done a lot of stuff. I've been really, really pleased and proud with what we've done. We were able to go to the Association of Library and Information Science Educators Conference in a very wintry, blizzardy Philadelphia in January, and do a jury paper and a jury panel about the MOOC. Out of that came an article that has already been accepted. I'm so excited about this, in the Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, that will appear before the end of the year. We have submitted an article on looking at the MOOC for the, sorry, the bespoke learning environment. I believe that's in the Journal of Learning Stasis, and I wrote sort of a pre, this is what we're going to do, piece last summer about it in Internet Learning. So I'll be out in Denver giving the paper that Kyle and I wrote about roles as well. So the next things, what are the next things? We are, and I'm going to click over here because I have it open in my browser. We're working with, hello, sorry, with Joanne DeGroote and Jennifer Branch on another aspect of the post survey. We asked some questions about community and how people perceive community within the MOOC. And Joanne and Jennifer have done some things looking at community and affinity spaces, and they recorded videos for us for our lease panel, and I just put in a URL there. If you can take another 20 minutes to sort of augment your learning from this colloquium, run over there sometime and listen to their words because they pull out some data from the MOOC survey and it's so interesting. So we'll be working with them on a paper about community and affinity spaces, and I think the tribes are really, really good examples of how affinity spaces might play out. We're also looking at doing an alumni survey, possibly in the fall, just to see how that first hearty group that went through with us, how they're doing, what impact the MOOC had, and what thoughts they might have a year later, just to see. And then, as we said, we've said a couple of times we're going to be offering the Hyperlink Library, massive open online course in spring of 2015, and they'll be more put out about that as we go forward, and hopefully we'll have some students that want to work with us as learning guides, et cetera. So here's about us, and I think we will open up the floor to questions if that's cool. I appreciate your attention. Yes, great. Thank you both, Kyle and Michael, for the presentation, and we do have some time for questions or comments from the participants. If you want to raise your hand or just grab the mic, that's fine, or put something into the chat box. Either of those will work. I do have a quick question actually, Michael and Kyle, with the course next spring. If somebody took the course already, has gone through the experience, would there be like a little section in there that would almost be like an advanced Hyperlink that you could have an alumni group participate next spring? I've thought about that, and I think Kyle and I have talked about it in various ways. I think something will happen, and I think we'll make something available to the alumni in some way, but I hadn't actually thought of it that way that we might open up some slots just in the actual course and then provide advanced stuff, which is, I remember that in the survey data that somebody said, I want advanced stuff now or whatever they said. Yeah, that's what I was thinking about too, Michael, is that in the survey somebody asked for an advanced track, but definitely I think there's a role there to be filled either as a learner or as a kind of like a personal learning guide for alumni of the course, and I think just off the top of the head, one of the things I would love to see is some kind of video, kind of like internal entry about, you know, talking to the new cohort of Hyperlink Library students about their experience, what they got out of it, and what you think, you know, what they think students should do to optimize their learning experience. I think that would be really powerful to hear from past students in talking to the new ones. Absolutely. Okay, we've got a comment in the chat box, and I need to read this for when the recording comes out on YouTube because they don't see the chat stuff. So Patty writes that, in our regional system, we promoted a MOOC from the Toronto Eye School on Advocacy. We encourage participation by offering a face-to-face gathering after week one in week six, participants, according to the feedback, found the face-to-face, very helpful for discussion of the learning and kept them on track. So I don't know if you guys want to comment on that or not. I would, I heard some great things about the Advocacy MOOC, and I actually was chatting with Stephen Abram about it at Texas Library Association because he was involved with that as well, and I think this is a really interesting idea, and I think that's something that maybe we might be able to suggest to folks that maybe if a library, for example, if a library system is going to get some people in it to do the MOOC again with us in the spring, they might offer some face-to-face or some various ways of supporting the learners. That would almost be like what some groups did with some of the original webinars where they sort of used them as in-service type of opportunities and brought groups in and watched or participated in the webinar as a group. And then after the webinar was over, had a sort of face-to-face post-webinar discussion. Right. And just to build off of that, Patty says yes, that just the combination of like human touch with the online environment would be great or would be helpful, and I agree. I think that would be wonderful if we could support that somehow, either technically or logistically, and I think one of the things that I would like to do next time, and I think, Michael, we've talked about this, is have some kind of synchronous events with the students, either if that's a good thing out or doing it text-based like a Twitter chat, you know, an hour every week or something like that. That could provide more of a human touch, I guess, that maybe we didn't have before, but it wouldn't be like in the flesh in the same room, but yeah. Absolutely. Okay, we have a comment from Margaret who said she took a leadership through emotional intelligence MOOC along with a colleague. We did our own study, but met weekly to discuss, especially helpful to talk about how what we were learning could be utilized in our workspace. So that reinforces some of what we were talking about. And I guess what now what Michael, you and Kyle would need to do is figure out how one of you could go spend a week in Europe and then the other one a week in Australia, so you could have those face-to-face sessions, right? Yeah, yeah, I think that's great. I think there's an IMLS grant in there somewhere for us, right, Bill? Absolutely, guys. You got to go for it. All right, we've got a comment from Silva. Will you be advertising the upcoming hyperlink MOOC to non-library professionals perhaps as an effort to rebrand the role of libraries and librarians? That's a great question. Wow, that's a very interesting question. I don't know. We certainly could. I know it will be advertised through all the channels that SLIS uses as well as all of our networks that we participate in. I guess it just if it depends on if those messages get to the folks that might be beyond libraries. Yeah, it would be challenging to reach out into those venues for non-librarians. I think the other part in the parentheses is interesting. As an effort to rebrand the role of libraries and librarians, I mean that would be politically loaded if we were trying to market it as a rebranding exercise, but maybe there's something in there in terms of getting a kind of rethinking or a reflection back on what it means to be. And I think we try to do this kind of implicitly in the literature and the model is to rethink what it means to be a librarian in an hyperlinked world. Okay, I'll read Shanae's comment. And she says, I think it should be used as a recruiting tool by an LIS program, certainly by San Jose. It's a fantastic course. Thank you. Shanae's in the class right now with me, so I appreciate that. And that's something Kyle and I, when we talked about the alumni survey, that's something we might look into. Did this experience going through a course offered by San Jose SLIS lead to some of the students coming to the MLIS, to the Postmaster Certificate, to the, any of the things that we offer? That might be something really interesting to look into. Right, if you have the list of original names of that 300 or so number, we can certainly check to see a year or so afterwards who is a student. Or even now with the opportunity to take other courses on a one-off basis. Right. We can see if that sparks any interest in that regard. And then Margaret, one of, who I'll have to admit is one of our alums, also says that it gave San Jose State even better reputation. So thank you very much for that. And Michael Casey writes, so much talk in my library regarding professional development, finally being fun and educational, which is always good. Lots of pent-up demand with existing librarians. And that's a good statement as well, Michael. That's nice. Thanks, Michael. Now we think getting back to that one comment about trying to get word out to non-library environments, potentially trying to tap into some of the distance education network might be useful. And we've got people, Michael Stevens, that you know, on staff who could potentially help with some of that. Absolutely. And then Margaret's got the question about any other class you want to develop. And I presume you mean Margaret to develop, to offer as a MOOC. Yeah. Michael, what's your thought on that? I know, I don't think we really had a conversation about that together. But I mean, I look at your, what is it, you're an emerging kind of learning and instructional technologies course is something that could also be extremely relevant in this area. Yeah. Transformative learning. It could be a bit, it almost like it would double around on itself. I am working with Alice who's here in the room on some things related to archives. So that may be something that we roll out and open. Maybe not, I don't know what it will be exactly, but Alice and I are working on something. So that digital preservation, thanks Alice. Thank you. My brain is a little fried right now. So yeah, we're going to look at digital preservation. I'm going to kind of help point the way for that. Cool. And yes, Charbooth, absolutely, who was a guest lecturer for Hyperlink Library MOOC. Yeah. And there might be something, and one of the things I've been talking a lot about in this, again, it's just so self-reflective is this concept of infinite learning and learning everywhere. So maybe there is something to take away from that. Okay. This is Shanae, and I love this. This is so cool. I also have to say that it was so relevant to me in my current role in a large, not to be named software company, and so a confalic. It's about information, emerging technologies, and Hyperlink communities beyond just libraries. Just did a kindness audit, yay for kindness audit, for our onboarding of new hires based on the course. And again, just for everybody in the room and listening, Shanae is in the class right now with me, and she's taken what we're doing in the Hyperlink Library and brought it into her corporate environment. And I really appreciate that comment. Thank you so much. Any other? We still have a couple of minutes. That's a great comment. Since Shanae follows up with the new hires, thank you. So I presume they like the kindness audit. Again, let me thank both Michael and Kyle for their presentation today, and thanks everybody, each and every one of you for participating, and certainly with some of the comments that helped make the presentation that much more fulfilling. So thanks. And we will have, this is our last colloquium presentation, general colloquium presentation for the semester, but we will start up again next fall with some colloquium, and those are always advertised and promoted on the SLIS Web website. Thank you.


everyone welcome to the close of July 25th. We have some earnings coming out interesting that Microsoft even though it had a beat obviously not good enough compared to what the expectations were selling off after the market and of course the opposite for Google but we're going to start today's video looking at meta which reports on the close of July 26th. What is the most interesting thing about this chart and you have a few things here that you may not be familiar with is number one it reached exactly to the top of the Bollinger Band when it made its high of 319. Number two it had a very clean reversal pattern we've seen these over and over where it makes a new 60 plus stay high next day closes below the low of that day and then gets some follow-through generally 5 to 10 percent. Number three is it's actually broken down under the Bollinger Band here. Number four is that you can see that it is underperforming the benchmark or against the SPY. Number five in terms of the momentum we did have the mean reversion back here it went on to eke out a new high and you can see that that that mean reversion to the sell side was good now we're getting a bearish divergence where it is breaking down under the 50-day moving average while the 50-day moving average here on the price chart is still much lower and what you cannot see is the July six month calendar range which by the way looks like under 285 would be a breakdown after failing to clear the calendar range high at 318.37. So keep that range in mind because what we're really saying here is that the overall sentiment right now has been in terms of the technicals perhaps atop of course the earnings can potentially change that but my sense would be that there hasn't been any real tangible earnings yet in terms of matter certainly threads hasn't necessarily brought in any money at this point and the VR that they've been launching I don't think has had any kind of record sales so for now where does that come from by the way this is the first trading day first trading range day of July and that's a 284 you can see it's much higher here in terms of the low of yesterday now how I would play this is clearly it may or may not do anything much ahead of the earnings tomorrow but if you just wanted to do it more as kind of a day trading ahead of the fact I would be looking first of all at some support here at this 293.40 level that's right underneath the candle up today it's also underneath the candle bodies of both of these days right here before I went on to make new highs so I would jot that down under 293.30 40 even 293.10 we're talking about an area here that bias to me would be negative and of course we can look at the Bollinger band as a clear indication over 297.50 would be positive and I'm speaking strictly day trading after the report of course as I said there's a breakdown under that six month calendar range low or 284.85 I would anticipate at least a move down to the 50 day moving average and given the momentum is now below it possibly even a move back down to around 258 at these levels now I would actually start considering more of a position from the long side but until then again bias now more to the doubt side let's move on one thing to add about meta is that snapchat just reported and that was down right after the report 17% so that also could be an indication of everything we just talked about on a negative bias towards meta going forward okay now let's flip to the more positive bias which of course is in yesterday's video I mentioned now we had to clear in momentum the zero line we did that I mentioned we had to confirm two days close over the 200 day moving average we did that I mentioned that we really had to get through $80 a barrel we did not do that so that makes tomorrow very easy at this point now we need to look at that 80 as the key should we cross that again I think we'd be looking more at 84 possibly even higher than that should we not be able to get through 80 then I would basically be saying at this point I would watch what happens here at 78 70 so I would have a negative bias under 78 70 for a day trading looking at a move back down to about 7650 77 a positive bias over 80 looking for at first a move closer to 81 50 82 and then from a longer standpoint really looking at a move as we saw yesterday not only over 8350 but levels that we have not seen in a while if we go back to let's say a year ago November moving on to gold so reminder that if it did not break two days in a row under the 50 day moving average it is not a confirmed phase change in this case it would have been to a caution phase instead now we can say we are back to an unconfirmed bullish phase and I say unconfirmed because the same thing it has to have two closes over the 50 looking at the momentum I don't see much a little bit of a pop here from the day before but also needs to do more and we're still seeing a bit of a bearish divergence here in momentum because here's your 50 day moving average in the real motion indicator yet we're above it in price we like to see both together really for the most explosive moves so looking at tomorrow right now what I would say is again let's use that 50 day moving average as the pivotal area so that would mean to me that 1960 exactly what we talked about for coming into today is still going to be a bias below negative a bias above positive you can see 1950 has been holding up relatively well if we continue to break from there and I think we'd have a little bit more of a sharper decline of course we have the FOMC coming out and on the flip side if 1960 maintains a we need a second close above it and B from a trading trading standpoint over 1967 I would think that this will continue to rise at least to get back up to that 1980 level we've been watching before we reevaluate and finally let's take a look at the SPX so here we have folks the SPX and I think the most interesting thing we can say about the chart is first of all from a closing basis you're going to see that we have new closing here on new 50 to two week high closing but what's more interesting to me was that the high from this day was 4578 43 and the high from today was 4580 62 so we did make the high a new high today however look where we closed we closed remember I said the high here was 4578 we close under the old high under today's high which means that we are all we are potentially ripe for a little bit of a sell-off in the S&P so what would we be watching for first of all I would say you can just look right now that this 4565 level is pivotal above bullish below bearish and of course you know I'm talking very short time frame we break below it I would be looking first of all at the supported around 4537 and then if we break down even under that obviously 4520 would be next and we really do have support pretty much all the way down what we don't want to see is this gap get filled from when it gapped up this day at this point now we are thinking a correction might even be a little bit healthy we have still no mean reversion on the Bollinger Band in the actual real motion momentum indicator but certainly that would be something that I would be watching for as well now if we get through this level at 4567 then obviously not only would we potentially be looking at a new 52 week high but once again we've got to go back a little bit here in history to see where we've been and the last major resistance was up I would even go a little bit lower forty six hundred so that's kind of I don't expect to see that in one day although you never know but that would be the next area I would be looking at for some level of resistance as spectacular as this move up has been if we go back you can see we still have a lot of areas to look at for problems going back to when we peaked at the end of twenty twenty one okay that's it for now hope you have a good day tomorrow hope this was helpful and I'll speak to you all again soon thanks for watching bye for now


What is going on ladies and gentlemen and welcome back to another Bitcoin daily video in today's video I'm sad to say it's officially the last video that we're doing this year guys We are doing a special 2020 year in review video 2020 has been an exciting year in cryptocurrency guys And today we're gonna do a recap on the insane ride and highlight the roller coaster of events on Bitcoin's journey to almost $30,000 the global COVID-19 pandemic took the entire world by storm and changed the lives of millions of people This had a direct impact on all industries and markets and cryptocurrencies were absolutely no exception 2020 although it had its lows Perhaps it's safe to say that the highs were much more Bitcoin went on a roller coaster It started off the years steadily crashed Massively a few months later and came back stronger than ever to chart highs that we haven't seen before The total market cap is almost at the point that it was back in 2017's parabolic run though this time things are looking very very different. So without any further ado Let's have a look at the most important events of 2020 and how we ended up right here where we are today Guys make sure that you like and subscribe guys hit that notification bell and drop a comment Let us know if you've been in this bull run And if you guys are interested in using the exchange that we use we use by bit in the description We have a link where you guys can sign up to do that And you'll be able to get some rewards on your initial deposit up to around a hundred dollars or more So without further ado, let's jump right in guys January through March the world before COVID Bitcoin started the year strong. It opened the year up at seven thousand three hundred and fifty dollars soon after Bitcoin option contracts were launched on CME providing Institutional investors the opportunity to receive exposure to the cryptocurrency in their portfolio Bitcoin ended up running up about 42 percent to a high of ten thousand five hundred dollars In mid-February before the panic started to set in corona was born Technically the corona virus was discovered in China before the beginning of 2020 but it was really in March when most countries took serious measures as the virus went rampant Corona began to spread in China around February But at this point the spread was somewhat limited to the country itself But towards the end of the month that's when things started taking a turn for the worst In March Wall Street saw the fastest 10% drop in its entire history Bitcoin saw one of the worst weeks that it's seen since 2013 with a 33% drop Including a 45% drop on March 12th itself. It dropped from seven thousand nine hundred and thirty nine dollars To four thousand three hundred dollars on that one day once it does settled, however Many realize that the worst had passed and that the best was yet to come Especially with what our governments did next April to July Fed's printers go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr So starting in April governments across the world started printing out money to stimulate the entire economy and bailout corporations In the midst of all the money printing, institutions began to realize that there was opportunity in Bitcoin. Feds continued to make the printers go Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. On May 7th, Paul Tudor Jones allocated 1-2% of his funds to Bitcoin Futures. A few days later on May 11th was the third-ever halving, which reduced the supply of freshly minted bitcoins in half while of course the Fed's printers went. Grayscale, the largest cryptocurrency fund manager, started buying up more bitcoins further reducing supply. In June, the v-shaped recovery finally came in. Nasdaq hit fresh new all-time highs as the Fed just kept throwing money into the market. In July, it was Ethereum's fifth birthday and consequently it hit a five-month high. Soon after that, the SEC fined Telegram $18.5 million. This happened in June but it foretold how the regulatory landscape would develop in the months to come. August to October, the DeFi craze was born. The DeFi market went parabolic. Wi-Fi or year in finance went from $0 to $44,000. Something that no one could have expected or predicted. And even though the cryptocurrency has since then halved its price, it's still technically the second most expensive crypto on the market today. After that, we saw plenty of projects flooding the DeFi space. One of them was Uniswap, the world's leading decentralized exchange protocol. During these same periods, MicroStrategy adopted Bitcoin as its primary reserve asset and bought $250 million worth of Bitcoin, or $21,454. And shortly after that, MicroStrategy bought another $175 million more in Bitcoin, upping its Bitcoin holdings to $425 million. Of course, Jack Dorsey from Twitter and Square didn't want to be left out, so he invested with his company Square $50 million into Bitcoin as well. Stone Ridge Holdings bought more than 10,000 Bitcoins as part of its strategy of making Bitcoin its primary treasury reserve asset as well. Then PayPal announced its plans to start offering customers the options to buy, sell, and store cryptocurrencies. This was a massive deal for the entire industry because the huge network of merchants that PayPal serves can now also be able to use crypto as a means of payment. So during all this euphoria, BitMEX was then sued with claims that it has been running and legal derivatives exchange. Soon after, Arthur Hayes stepped down as a CEO. And after that, John McAfee was also charged with promoting fraudulent initial coin offerings. Then came November and December, the boom of the market. The last two months of this year were nothing short of spectacular for Bitcoin. The most impressive part was that this isn't a retail driven hype cycle. Institutional investors were the ones fueling the fire behind Bitcoin this time around. Soon after, more and more hedge funds began to invest in Bitcoin as well. So of course, naturally Bitcoin tested previous all time highs in November for the first time since 2017. In December, MicroStrategy bought $700 million more in Bitcoin, putting its total Bitcoin holdings over $1 billion. Bitcoin, of course, broke all time highs. And as you guys know, we're currently at $29,000. But of course, the government wanted to come and attack us yet again, right? So the SEC pressed charges against Ripple. The XRP has now been delisted in many major exchanges, which plummeted the price by more than 65%. 2020 was perhaps the most interesting year for the entire cryptocurrency industry. The single most crucial fact that everyone should by now be aware of is that it stood the test of one of the worst challenges that the entire world has had to face in the past decades. This is a clear testament that blockchain and cryptocurrencies are here to stay. This should also put a definitive damper on the it's a bubble narrative because its resilience was put to the test like never before. Alrighty guys, this concludes our yearly recap. We at Bitcoin Daily would like to thank all of you, our followers, and subscribers, and wish that you and your close ones be blessed with health, happiness, and profits in this new year. Stay safe guys, and as always, peace and love. See you guys next year!


Hi and welcome to the session. Let's work out the following question the question says solve for x a b x square Plus b square minus ac into x minus bc is equal to 0 So let us start with a solution to this question Now here we see that we have a b x square Plus b square minus ac into x Minus bc is equal to 0 now here if we compare this equation to the standard equation that is a x square plus Bx Plus c equals to 0 or let us say a dash x square Thus b dash x plus c dash equal to 0. So a dash is equal to a b b dash is equal to b square minus ac and C dash is equal to minus bc then we can find the determinant Sorry, it's discriminant d that is equal to b dash square minus 4 into a dash into c dash We simply put down the values here that is b square minus ac the whole square minus 4 into a b into minus bc That is equal to b square minus ac the whole square plus 4 into a b square c Therefore, we can say that x is equal to minus b plus minus square root of d divided by 2a or minus b dash to plus minus square root of d divided by 2a dash Now we can put down the values here and we have minus b square minus ac Plus minus square root of discriminant that is b square minus ac the whole square Plus 4 into a b square c divided by 2 into a dash a dash was equal to a b Now this is equal to minus b square minus ac plus minus square root of b square the whole square Plus ac the whole square minus 2 into b square into ac plus 4 a b square c and this divided by 2 a b Now this is equal to minus b square minus ac plus minus square root of b square the whole square plus 2 b square ac Plus ac the whole square divided by 2 a b and This is equal to minus b square minus ac plus minus square root of b square plus ac the whole square divided by 2 into a b This is equal to minus b square minus ac Plus minus now square root of b square plus ac the whole square is b square plus ac divided by 2a now We have two options that x can be equal to minus b square minus ac Plus b square plus ac divided by 2a or x is equal to minus b square minus ac minus b square plus ac divided by 2a Now this gives us x is equal to minus b square plus ac Plus b square plus ac divided by 2a This is equal to now minus b square gets cancelled with plus b square. We have 2 ac divided by 2a Now 2a gets cancelled with 2a now here we have b also So let us write down b here. We have 2 a b in the denominator here. Also. We have this 2 a b Here also we have b so we are left with c upon b Therefore x is equal to c upon b now. Let us solve this one here x is equal to minus b square plus ac minus b square minus ac divided by 2 a b This is equal to how plus ac gets cancelled with minus ac. We have minus 2 b square divided by plus 2 a b you see that 2 gets cancelled with 2 b gets cancelled with one of the b's in the numerator and we have minus b upon a So our answer to this question is that either x is equal to c upon b or x is equal to minus b by a So I hope that you understood the solution and enjoyed the session. Have a good day