In today's video I'm going to show you how to easily breed perfect IV competitive ready Pokemon in Pokemon Scholar and Violet. But before we get into today's video please subscribe to the channel remember you can always unsubscribe later if you would like to. Now there are a few prerequisites we need to do before we can jump into the breeding process itself. The first thing that we're going to need to get which is going to be a huge time saver is going to be a Flim body Pokemon. Now the ability Flim body is obviously in competitive it has a 30% chance to burn an opponent if a contact move is made with your Pokemon. But outside of competitive battling it does have another effect. Whenever you have a Pokemon with Flim body in your party it cuts down the steps required for an egg to hatch by 50% which is huge a huge time saver especially if you are hatching a lot of eggs. There are a number of Pokemon within the Paldaire region that have the ability Flim body. There's Fletchinder this one's a good one because it is available very early on in the games you can see it's right next to the starting point where you start out your journey so an easy one to pick up. You're going to have other options like Roli-Koli like Kalkol their options pretty common options as well available in the eastern areas of the region as you can see here it's Roli-Koli in this area towards the east and then Kalkol as well in the desert sort of areas where you'd imagine to find these Pokemon. I've also got the option of Chalkadet as well this will have the Flim body ability obviously this thing appears everywhere around the Paldaire region the only issue is it is a bit of a rare spawn so it might be harder to get than some of the other options we're listing here and the final one I'll list just so you've got a few options is Lavesta it does spawn in desert you can see here on the map where it does spawn but having a Flim body ability Pokemon it is an essential but it definitely is a huge time saver. The next thing that we're going to need to help us out not essential of course are ingredients for a particular sandwich which is going to help us with the frequency that eggs appear in our picnics so we are currently in Mesugosa west this is the pokemon center that we are spawned in on from here you can see two shops over there we've got Shurkans is the first place that we want to head to and in here this shop right here it's easy enough to get to can't miss it is going to be Bananas so Bananas is going to be the first one that we're going to want to get obviously we've got a bunch of them so they're not going to pick anything up nothing else from here and then we're going to head down to the Bakery I think it's Artisan Bakery I'm not sure what its name is I can never remember but this bakery right here and we are going to buy butter it is the Artisan Bakery okay we got it right we're going to buy peanut butter a bunch of peanut butter make sure you've got peanut butter make sure you've got actual butter as well and the other tip I would say is just to pick up a bunch of silver picks now it goes without saying you probably already know this but just in case you don't you can't make a sandwich without a pick if you run out of picks you can't make sandwiches so just make sure you're stocked up on the picks doesn't matter which ones you've got the cheapest ones always are the best option for me and we've got those again we are in Mesugosa west the pokemon center here as soon as you're here you want to just look over to the right and take this route and go down the stairs here and we want to be heading to this deli bird presence shop here and you'll be able to see it there'll be a big deli bird sign on it and this is another important place where we can pick up two very important items so the first item that we're going to get and I'm not going to say when this is available because I honestly don't know and I don't want to put out misinformation if you know when this item becomes available if you've got it at a certain stage in your game it would be great to hear from you let me know down in the comment section below and I can pin it for future people for reference so they know how to obtain it but the item we're talking about is the destiny knot it is going to be available for 20 000 polka dollars or 20 000 league points but this is an essential item in the whole breeding process for passing down iv so pick this up we've already got one and the other item is going to be in general goods again just come back down to the bottom of this list and the other item is the everstone you may already have an everstone that you've picked up around the area because they are a pickup item but if you don't this is a great place to come and get one very cheap as well but this is an item where you can attach it to a pokemon that you're breeding with and it will make sure that the nature the pokemon that's holding it is always passed down to the baby pokemon so if you've got a ditto with a jolly nature and you want your baby pokemon to always have that jolly nature make sure the ditto is holding the everstone essentially that's how it works the next thing you're going to need is a ditto it's not mandatory but it definitely makes the process a lot easier especially if you're breeding competitive like perfect iv pokemon now i did a video on the channel how to get ditto the areas it spawns and the best ways to catch a high iv ditto there are a few areas around the pal de air region where you can get ditto i'll put them up on the screen now predominantly in this band towards the northwest region of the pal de air region but i have done a video like i say and the best place to get high iv ditto is going to be from terror aides five star and six star terror aides are going to be the best place for you to pick up your higher iv ditto although not essential you can do this process with a three two one iv ditto if you desire it will take a bit longer obviously but it is possible now the other essential item that you're going to need and you're going to only be able to get this after you've beat the elite four is the iv judge the iv judge is a way for you to go into your boxes and check the ivs how good they are with your pokemon you'll normally come into your pokemon boxes you'll see a screen like this on all your pokemon just showing the raw stats of that particular pokemon now once you've beat the elite four all you need to do is visit a pokemon center and the lady at the pokemon center will inform you about the iv judge and now how it's a function when you go into your pokemon boxes and you can toggle the plus button on your controller and check the pokemon's ivs now they will show up in descriptions like this you're going to have best for perfect which is going to be 31 you're going to have fantastic which is 30 you're going to have decent pretty good and no good at all so they are the options i'll put them all on the screen now so you can see what each description of a stat means in regards to the parameters for knowing what range an iv sits in okay with everything that we've got so far we've got the destiny of the everstone we've got a flim body pokemon we've got a ditto and we do have a pokemon that we are looking at breeding to get those perfect ivs on so what we want to do now is head out into an area where we can set up our picnics now we've got a nice area to set up our picnics the first things that we're going to want to check are that we've got the two pokemon in our party that we're going to want to breed with we've got a tinketon and that's all we want to be breeding at the minute we want to concentrate on that until that is the perfect pokemon that we've got we've got a ditto on our party as well and to make sure that we're passing the ivs down from the ditto we want to place the destiny knot on this pokemon so how the destiny knot works is when the destiny knot is attached to one of the pokemon that you're breeding with it will mean that five random ivs from both parents it can be completely random which ivs they are but it will be a combination of five ivs so both parents will always be passed down to the baby pokemon so this is why it's always good to have a ditto or as close to a perfect iv ditto to breed with as possible because then you're increasing your chances of passing down those higher ivs thankfully for this process i do have a high iv tinketon this is from a five star terror raid so this one has got four perfect ivs to start with so we want to pass down all of the ivs between these two we're going to have good chances there are nine perfect ivs between these two pokemon out of a possible 12 so it means there is a good chance of having at least five of those perfect ivs passed down to one of the baby pokemon especially if we're doing a lot of them now the next thing that we want to make sure we've got is a empty box ready for the eggs to go into once you start a picnic and you start to collect eggs these eggs are automatically going to be put into a box so they're not going to go into your party they're going to go straight into your box so you're going to have to exit the picnic to come in and then collect them so like i say we've got an area where we want to set up a picnic we want to just set a picnic up we've got a destiny knot on a ditto we don't have a preferable nature that we want to pass down to the baby pokemon on the tinketon or the ditto at the moment so we don't need to worry about the everstone the next thing that we want to do is recall cariodon because we don't need you here for this is make a sandwich because it will speed the process of eggs being produced although it's not necessary it is something that speeds the whole process up and when you're breeding competitive pokemon the big thing about that is making sure that you can do this as quickly as possible now the sandwich that we're going to look for is the great peanut butter sandwich you can see the meal power that it gives you it is going to give you level two egg power and that's what we're concerned about here the egg power just means how quickly eggs are going to be produced between your pokemon that are breeding in your picnic so your egg frequency will occur a lot quicker so what we want to do is just get pick a silver pick and create this sandwich now sandwich effects will last for 30 minutes so as soon as you made this we're going to have 30 minutes as long as we make it right to take advantage of this power until we'd have to do another sandwich and create the exact same again if we're still breeding at this stage but we should produce a lot of eggs in that amount of time and be able to do this process especially with the higher iv pokemon that we've got it shouldn't take too long for us to do but like i say if you've not got a perfect iv ditto as i've got and you're starting off with a tinketon that's maybe got no perfect ivs this process is possible still you just example you use the same process as we're using now but it may just take a bit longer so you're gonna just have a bit of patience obviously once you get established with breeding a bit more you manage to get some perfect iv ditto or five perfect iv ditto or four perfect iv ditto this will all become a lot more straightforward as you can see here on the screen once you've made the sandwich you've got that egg power two level two is what we want you can use egg power level one as well and you can also use the restaurants as well to get egg power you don't need to generally rely on the sandwiches to to get these egg power food vendors will have options that produce egg power might be just level one but that might just be enough for you to start speeding things up so we can literally just sit back and relax really for a minute because the basket should fill up with eggs now it is worth noting that the basket can only hold 10 eggs at a time so it is worth checking every so often because after that you're not going to produce any more eggs but if you peek in the basket doesn't seem to be anything in the basket so far maybe we need to wake you up tinketon get your hammer nothing in the basket just yet so we're just going to sit and wait and once we look in the basket this time there seems to be a pokemon egg inside do you want to take it yes i do yes so we'll take that one we'll have another look peek inside the basket doesn't seem to be anything there at the minute and we'll just have to sit and wait it is going to it is taking a bit longer than i initially thought for these eggs to be produced this time around and as soon as i started getting the ball out to start playing with the pokemon i don't know if that's got any correlation with how quickly eggs are made but eggs did start popping up it could be just a coincidence doesn't seem to be anything in the basket so even with the egg power on sometimes it can take a bit longer for eggs to appear in the basket it's not going to be just super quick sometimes depends on the pokemon that you've got the r and g can affect it as well in the game so normally you'll go to your basket with the egg power activated and you're going to have a basket full of eggs after a minute or so but sometimes like this this is the first time for me when i've been doing breeding where the eggs are taking a little bit longer so it is just something to keep it in mind okay we've got a few eggs so we can just use this as an example we'll pack up for the moment we want our flame body pokemon lechinder we'll put our ditto who's holding the destiny up there now the first thing that we really want to do with these eggs is try we're probably going to just if you haven't got the natures that you really want is to just breed a bunch of them to begin with because then you're going to just eventually get the nature that you want from the eggs and from that point on you can then start breeding down that nature with the everstone until you've got the nature that you really want you can use nature mince they're really accessible in this game so it is an option but if you want to be a bit more of a traditionalist then you can you can use this method with the everstone as well just to save you some cash i guess as well so once you've got the eggs in your party you've got the flame body user in your party you want to just kind of run around with these eggs and see if you can hatch a poke so once we've hatched all of them we do have one more we can hatch as well so we'll just hatch this one while we're at it i'll just put these in the box for the minute and then we'll check the ivs we've got four perfect ivs passed down on this one we've got three passed down on this one nothing then we've got five passed down on that one just the speed not that great on that one um and then yeah we've not got a perfect one yet this one's not too bad though if we could just get the speed passed down on this one that's pretty good natures though we've got nothing with the jolly nature yet so we have to see and keep our fingers crossed this last egg will have the jolly nature and it's a lot faster i feel in skull and violet that it has been in previous games so this is the final egg that we've got before going for round two that we want nature is serious and we've got that no good speed passing down but other than that it's not too bad so what we could use it is one of these to breed with to be honest we could use this one in particular it's got probably a better spread than the one that we were using so and we can just pop this into our party we'll pop fletch in there back in here as well because we don't want to get any fletch in their legs eggs and we can come to a nice area get off our mount pokemon and we will set up another picnic now we should still have the egg power active so getting eggs will still be sped up okay there's the fifth egg so we can pack up this now and we can hatch our next five eggs now okay so that is all the tinketon and we can have a look at the iv spread see if we've got anything good here so we've got that speed pass down again nothing good there just three pass down here um there we go we've got it okay that is a perfect tinker tink it is perfect it has got the best hp attack defense speed and special defense so that is a flawless pokemon we haven't got the jolly and we've got a jolly nature one here so what we want to look for between the two is which one's going to be better to breed down with so yeah this one is better because it's got four perfect ivs this one's only got three perfect ivs so we can breed this one with the ditto we can breed this one with the ditto get the jolly and then try the process over one more time so we do have a perfect iv one which we can definitely use if we want to use a nature mint on it but otherwise we're gonna have to try and and repeat the process again but now what we can do is we can give this tinker tink the everstone and that is going to be a huge plus for us to make sure that everyone after this is going to have that that jolly nature so we'll give the everstone to tinker tink we've got the destiny knot on the ditto and we can just set up another picnic okay we should have enough eggs now to do another round of hatching okay we've got our next round of eggs we can just run around and get the hatched so let's have a look and see what the ivs are you can see that they've all got that jolly nature this one's very close to being perfect and this one's not good enough this one has no not got perfect ivs got a bunch of them very close as well this one got that zero iv speed and zero iv speed so not brilliant all of them this one's pretty perfect if you wanted a trick room one it's just got the wrong nature it's not a bad one to keep of course you can change your nature on it with our nature mint but that fantastic defense gives you 30 defense anyway these ones in the box though this one is probably the closest one with the four perfect ivs and then i think we have another one here which has got four perfect ivs so these are two of the better ones i don't think it really makes a difference which one we use so as you can see we're getting very close to this final breed we've got the nature finally we've got the everstone on that so that'll always be passing down and you can see the combination of perfect ivs between the two pokemon will match up so all we need is the best perfect iv from the ditto pass down to the tink-a-tink and then it will have a perfect spread as i say we're not worrying about the special attack okay we got five more eggs so we should be able to do hopefully the last round of hatching and that's our last one so we'll be able to check all the ivs on these new hatchlings to see if we've got that perfect iv thread now so i'll just take the camera off we'll be able to see everything right best best no good in defense but everything else pretty good oh so close so close and there we go we've got it okay we've got it and it has the terra steel type as well so we have got a perfect breed for our tink-a-tink now and it only take it has taken a little while because of the amount of eggs that were produced okay so we can change the markings on it perfect hp attack defense special attack very good but not what we're concerned about with perfect special defense iv and perfect speed as well so this is perfect with that jolly nature it saves us having to go out and buy any nature mints and any bottle caps or anything like that now we can just level it up and we can get this thing ready to battle for competitive in no time so you can literally use this process with anything as long as you've got a ditto or even just two pokemon that have good ivs you just need the destiny not to pass those ivs down so what you're doing is looking for two pokemon say your ditto here has a perfect special defense iv and this tink-a-tink has a perfect attack iv but everything else is not good use the destiny not until you get a baby with those two perfect ivs on it and then you switch the tink-a-tink out with the better one and you repeat the process until you get that perfect five iv pokemon and it can be done it will just take a bit longer if you don't have the better breeding parents but if you've got a better set of breeding parents then it won't take long at all like you can see this is my first perfect breed in pokemon scarlet and violet and learning the new mechanics the everstone still works like it does the destiny snot still works like it does there are a bunch of ways to get really good high level pokemon around the region using five star terror aids six star terror aids it's easy enough to do a lot of this a bear in mind you're going to need the iv checker so it is late post game content so you're not going to be able to do it until you finish the games but this guide hopefully will give you an idea of everything you need to put into practice for you to stop breeding perfect pokemon pretty easily in pokemon scarlet and violet i hope you found today's video useful friends this is very early days with these games being out and not all information about breeding is known yet so i'm likely to do an updated guide very soon when we've got a bit more information on everything to do with breeding and how to really kind of streamline this process but as far as it goes for now these are the basic steps that you're going to need in the principles to breed perfect iv pokemon go out get a ditto get a high iv ditto and then catch the pokemon that you'll want to breed it with and then kind of just repeat the processes that i've done in this video using the everstone using the destiny snot and using the sandwiches to boost the egg power obviously the egg power is not essential but it does help speed things up i dread to think how long this would have took if i didn't have egg power because of how long it actually took for the ditto and the tinketing to produce eggs which is way crazier but that's how it goes sometimes with these pairings when you put certain pokemon together they don't like each other too much so they don't produce eggs as quickly as well you've got to remember tinketing is a female only pokemon so it might be a reason why it takes a bit longer to breed than the other ones but we did get there in the end i guess i hope you found this guide useful if you have please drop a like on the video do consider subscribing to the channel for more pokemon scholar and violet content and i will see you all in another video very soon so until then friends take care of yourselves and bye bye


The objective of this game is to what? To win, that's it, real simple, not very hard to do. And how do you win? So here's some of the ideas that you may have for the contestants to play as to how they're going to win. Because you are a key component of the winner. There is no single Regis Philbin kind of character in this thing at all, no Ann Richardson person. So a lot of people are going to be involved in making the decisions here. In order to win the game, you have to do an awful lot of different things. And one of them is going to be sticking to time limits. One of them is going to be creativity. So the list of things for the contestants that they have to do are not necessarily obvious. That's why we put the list. Now the winner gets an awful lot. We're going to be donating 50 copies, $800 worth of the cyber ethics book to the institution, educational institution of your choice for the winner. You also get free DEF CON attendance for life. You'll get one of those great DEF CON jackets. And there may be some other stuff thrown at you. But obviously bragging rights is key. And for those of you that have been following what's going on with Jeopardy over the last umpteen years, you'll get to come back and defend your title again next year. So fundamentals are pretty darn simple. Game requirements, we're going to be looking at issues of ethics. They combine with the law. The law is black and white. The ethics is gray. So where do all of these pieces come together? In the book that I did on cyber ethics, one of our judges, Jennifer Granik, please stand up. She was highly instrumental in trying to get some of the balance between the ethics and the legal sections. And we had a few good arguments. And I had to switch parties since talking to her. So some of the key things. 18 people are going to play. 17 of them are going to come out looking damn foolish. So for those of you who think you wanted to play, let's see how that actually goes. There are judges. And the judges are, if you'd introduce yourselves, please. Jennifer is the lead judge. And she's Jennifer Granik of? I work at Stanford now. I'm Chris Goggins with Counterpane. Richard Thiem. I'm Sarah Gordon. There is going to be a timekeeper who is supposed to be here by now. And so I hear by a point, Richard, the timekeeper. Come on up, Richard. You've got to be the timekeeper. It'll be very simple. There will be numbers. You follow the numbers. And you get to yell at people. You need a watch? Yeah, I need a watch. The timekeeper needs a watch. Yeah, but he's here. He's here, at least. Because part of the game is when you're answering the questions, you want to stick within the time limits for two reasons. One, you get boring after 20 seconds. Number two, we want to get the game to get you out of here before Hacker Hacker Jeopardy begins. Audience, you guys are key to this. And I'm only the host of the facilitator. I do not contribute answers or anything to this at all. The chief judges, we do run through who the judges are. Unfortunately, Peter Smith from the ITAA was unable to make it tonight. So we have a nice round number of four judges to make all the decisions when something comes up. How to win. You've got to keep the judges happy. You've got to keep the audience on your side. And you have to determine strategy. How are you going to be playing the game? The ethics of the game playing itself. Not only the ethics of the questions, but the your personal ethics of how you interact with other people in a forum where you're being videotaped live. We're going to have a group, a number of questions are going to occur. And we're going to get rid of people step by step. Any time there is a dispute about anything, the judges make the final decision. They may ask you your opinion as well. If you have individual comments, you will have your opportunity to raise your hand and holler out and make your thoughts as well based upon what the contestants are doing. You are required to humiliate people. This is DEFCON, remember. And there is only going to be one winner. That's it. This game is kind of aimed because it's an ethics. We're trying to keep it sane. We'd like to keep the language down. This is not hacker jeopardy. Plenty of time for beer and that later on this evening. But PGPG13, we are talking about ethics. The game benefits. Well, when Jeff and I got talking about doing something for ethics at DEFCON, he was kind of intrigued by it. The media has picked up a little bit on it to show, perhaps, that the word hacker and hackers are not so bad. So a lot of what's going to go on up here is going to be reflective of the community. And I don't know any of the people on the list. So we're going to kind of get a look, see how they are doing. So in order to let the game begin, I'm going to hand this over to the judges. And they're going to bring up our contestants. And we're going to have two teams with really, really great names. Team A. Can anybody guess what this? Team B! Team B! Team B! Team A! Team B! Team A! Team A! I don't have time to redo all the slides. So if you guys would start bringing these folks up. OK. If I mispronounce your name, I apologize. The next contestant, Pai Yin, also from Stanford. No? OK. Then I'll take the next person on the list. Alexius Pendragon. There we go. Thank you. Come on up. The doctor. Is there a doctor in the house? OK. Mr. Pendragon, you can be on Team A. The doctor's on Team 2. Octol. Octol. All right. Wampus. Wampus. I apologize. This can be your team. Team A. Wade Benson. Wade Benson. All right. Rob Heward. Rob Heward. Thanks. Chris Raver. Thanks.  Oh, OK. Brian Egan. Yeah, Brian. Jeremy Bornstein. Brandy Schnaps. Brandy, the former porn artist? No? OK. We're going to need more girls. Michael Wilson. Nicholas Digani. Desani. Nicholas. Is that you, Nicholas? All right. Yeah. You're on Team A. Dan Burroughs. There's Mr. Burroughs. Welcome. All right. Welcome to the game, Dan. You're on Team 2.  Eric Sister Subsidium. Sister Subsidium. There's some handwriting issues here. Is this you? What's your name? Sigler. Sigler. Sigler Subsidium. Is that you? Wow. You guys really... Team A. Team A. I have people read for me. Mike Hammer. Welcome, Mr. Hammer. You can be on Team 2. Acetone. Hired Gun. Can we... No hired gun? I would just get up if I... Hey, that's me. OK. So... We need another girl. OK. We need a woman. What woman wants it? OK. Now I'm just going to go down the list and I'm going to call people and whoever's here gets to be on. We need six more people. Come on down. If you wrote down something pornographic, I'm not going to read it here. Twist. Ms. Linguist? Missing your chance. Tom Coleman. Daniel Weedal. Ben Dorman. Something that starts with an M. Jennifer, you're going to keep the microphone. First thing that we want to do is we want to find out a little bit about these people. So for Team A, where's the Team A microphone? If you just each introduce yourself a little bit, tell us a few seconds. You have 30 seconds maximum.  A little bit about yourself and the audience wants to know why you should win this game. These are all very simple questions. Hi, my name is Ben Dorman. I'm from Azula, Montana. I work at a programming company. They develop database software for 911 systems. I guess the best reason for me to win this game is because I am probably the most ethical person here. It's actually 20 seconds. First thing, you're already through, man. It's not a good sign. Let's see here. My name is Eric Sigler. Let's see here. Decoy. That means I'm not really here. Yeah, it's a bad sign to start off with. The best hack, it wasn't really a hack, it just managed to get someone duct taped to a chair and somehow managed to get them up and down about 20 floors before they could get out, you know? All right. My name is Jeff Strauss. I... I don't know, I'm still... Thank you. That's a good sign. Yeah, so I'm still in school and I think I should win because I've got the coolest handle around here, so I think that's a pretty good reason. My name is Asatone. I'm from Seattle and I should win because I'm the most ethical person here. Hi, my name is... Hi, Natasha. I'm from Silicon Valley, California and I'm not going to give you a line about being the most ethical person up here, but I think I should win because I think I'd appreciate anything out of Jeff Moss's hands. I'm one-fist and I need to win because I want to pick up hacks or chicks.  Best hack was telling Kevin Smith that his god was into bestiality and I should win because I understand that with great power comes great responsibility, but there's plenty of room for fun. Hey, I'm Stala. I'm 15 from Norman, Oklahoma, homeschooled and I should win because I have executed my Lama phase. I've learned a lot from it and I feel I've gained quite a bit of ethical knowledge from it. Thanks. Hi, I'm Nick. I'm from California. I should win because I have no idea why I'm on this stage right now. Judges, out of what you've heard, one of those people has got to go. For the most ethical one to leave. Which one was that? This guy. How was your 15 seconds of stardom? Alright, team B2. Where's your start on one end, please? Hi, I'm The Doctor. I'm a network administrator from the East Coast. Probably best hack in history was taking the Thuring Test and failing. Hi, Mike, otherwise known as Dot Zero. East Coast Systems Administrator, fairly large website. I try not to think bad thoughts. I have it in writing, so it must be true. My best hack actually related to load balancer failovers, and I found that... I'm a render man from Canada. Best hack probably has to be me and another antivirus critic ended up paying for and having a great deal of fun when networkassociates.com was allowed to lapse. So, I ended up paying for that for them. I'm Dan. I'm a research engineer at ISTS, and all my... Yeah, thank you. And all my work is funded by the DOJ, and if you can't trust someone who works for the DOJ, who can you trust? I'm Tom. I'm from New York. Fun little trip there. I'm a network technician. I think that I should win, because... I don't know. I mean, there's really no reason that anybody should win. I'm Danny. I'm a student at the University of Montana in Missoula, and I should win, because I'm wearing an orange shirt. I'm Brian Egan. I go to high school. I'm 17 years of age, and I need $800 to... hopefully help me get into college. Donate to that, to a college of my choice, and then apply to that college. I'm Krypta. I'm from Philly, and I need to win this because coming to DEF CON, now I'm totally broke, and I want something good to come out of it. I'm Nikki, also known as Amazon V, and I'm gonna say, why should I win this? I love duct tape and WD-40. What are the reasons you need? Judges, one of these people you intensely dislike, which one do you want to get rid of? The verdict of the court will be delivered by Justice Goggins. Well, I'm afraid since you didn't have a reason why you would win, you don't have a reason why you should stay. All right, so this is how easy the game is, and what we're gonna do now is get into the first round, and each round is gonna reduce people a little bit, and if we've done our job right, it's gonna get nasty. So the first is for Team A. Oh, we've done this one. Did that one. Team A, you have a cyber-ethical dilemma that I'm gonna present you. As a group, you're gonna sit and discuss it. The audience will think about it. We'll get some opinions from the audience. From the judges, you will pick a spokesperson to pick a spokesperson, and that spokesperson will speak for your group. And you have one minute to give the answer. And your question is, what is a hacker and what should a hacker be? What about you guys? The audience gets extra points for delivering beer to the judges. Extra points to the audience. Or chocolate. Chocolate also gains the justice's favor. Any beer, I think, is what beer? What beer? Justice is blind. We'll take any beer. Okay, Team A, spokesperson. Okay, I guess I'm the spokesperson. So what a hacker is and what a hacker should be, I guess was the question, and what a hacker is someone not limited to technology who is in pursuit of knowledge and background of any issue, not limited to technology, but to know how the inner workings and the guts of everything you come in contact with is. And what a hacker should be a carbon-based life form. All right, if you like it, give it up for it. That's all right. Team B, too. I'm assuming you've already picked your spokesperson. Oh, they couldn't figure that this was coming, could they? You do need a spokesperson, and your cyber-essical dilemma is the following. What is a lame-er and give some specific examples? Sorry? If anybody has a few sheets of paper that's being requested by the teams, a blank paper, used paper, anything, it'd be appreciated. Here come reams and reams of paper. All righty. All right, team B, too. Who's your spokesperson? It's Dan. It looks like I am.  And an example of somebody is, you know, any general script kitty, anybody that gets hacked into and can't figure out why, and that's about it. All right, thoughts?  Who should win this? Let's hear it for team A. Let's hear it for team B. Judges. Team B. Team B, one. Team two. All right, judges, why did team B win? Dan, we just want to say that if the audience wants its voice to be heard, we really need four cold beers up here. And for some reason or not, I mean, we care about them, but we're not going to particularly listen closely unless we have some beer. Do we have to beg for the goons to bring beer? Yeah, and when, you know, you said PG-13, not G. Team B won. They declared team B... Team two. Team B, two, one, according to the judges. The spokesperson for team A goes away. The winning spokesperson throws somebody off of your own team. Dan, who are you going to throw off?   And it builds character. We're into round four. And team A. Team A, you guys are going to have a question. Each can answer it. I believe it's 20 seconds to answer it, so the timekeeper will... You have 21 seconds. That's much better. Team A, each of you answer the following question. What? 21 seconds each. What should be done with spammers? Can I go? Go. All spammers should be thrown in the slammers. Ooh, bad joke. Spammers should be, first of all, reported to their ISPs, informed upon and always possible. If they continue, their accounts should be taken away. If the ISPs do not take action, you should take action on your own. Whoa! Vigilani-ism from Oklahoma. Spammers should be forced to pay for each email they send out to the person who received the spam. If they read it, they get money for it, too. Spammers should be forced to pay $500 per email to any user who does not wish to receive it. Seeing as how we don't know what's in spam, they should be made into spam. Spammers should be subjected to the torment that they subject all of us to by receiving spam themselves, and large quantities of spam. I think that would be good. One sign and one answer. Provide a mechanism for the user to opt out of the spam. The other one wants me to run through about 20,000 volts through each one of their genitalia, male-female doesn't matter, and then bolt their kneecaps to the floor. Discriminate both sides. Judges, which answers do you really like? Which ones do you not like? Any thoughts? Any thoughts out here about what we liked or didn't like? You like which? The voltage, the high voltage. The high voltage is good. Alright, team A, based upon the answers, who do you want to throw off of your team? No, not you, the gentleman here first. Yeah, who do you want to throw off? Probably myself. That's ethical. The green shirt should get thrown off because while making people into spam could help feed people in third world countries, running electricity through their genitalia is just sick. Alright, one each. I'm going to have to agree with her because I happen to know a few people who enjoy electricity and some of them are on the stage. Two against the genitalia. I'm going to have to go the same way because I know I wouldn't want electricity through my genitalia and there's probably nothing you could do bad enough to get that. Although electricity is good, I can think of much worse things to do to somebody. I don't know, I'll have to go the same way. I just agree with everybody, I guess. I did too. What? No, it's okay.  Well, thank you for it, thank you. Alright, so that was what? Three votes, four votes against him? What? You know, a lot of people, especially people in Vegas, pay to have electricity applied to the genitalia. So you don't want to rule that out just quite yet, guys. Well, I'm sorry, sir, with the votes against you. Thank you for playing and come up again next year. Give it... Boo! Team B, your cyber-ethical dilemma. Team two. Team 2B, thank you, I do apologize. Oh, the beer has begun, I can already tell. Okay, your question is, a newbie on the net comes to you, emails you and says, I really want to learn how to hack. Please teach me how to hack. What are you going to do? Give him a link to Amazon.com to buy a copy of Kernahan and Richie. I think the first thing that I did is explain to him what RTFM means. Woo! I want to thank Fufis for the beer. Thank you, Fufis. Here comes Team Beer. I can't wait patiently if you continue. We're having a beer break quite obviously here. It's ethical beer, came out of the ethical tab. Yes, sir, you're next. First, show them some books to read and then tell them if they have any specific questions. Yeah, email back, no problems in answering. The first thing I would do is ask them why. Ask them what they want to get out of it and find out just what their goals are and figure out if it's going to be productive to help them out or not. Send them a Trojan, you know. Take over their system. This works, use it. If I queue over 90, I'd send them out to Usenet to see what can happen to them there. Ladies, if you were talking to the microphones a little closer, it would be easier for everybody here, okay? I would most likely ask them what they've done before asking me if they've read any books, if they've built a computer. And if they have, I'd probably point out a few more books and things like hacking your own system and things to do. All right, judges, who do we like up there and who do we not like? You like the guys giving out Trojans? But I represent the unethical portion of the judges. Oh, you're the unethical judging. All right, well, we need to find out. Who would you like to throw off of your team to make sure you continue to success here? I'd have to say Danny because it sounds like the voice of experience.  I have to go with Dan, too. I'm sorry. Yeah, I agree. It's not going to help things. I'm going with the other Dan because that was just kind of a lame response. No offense, bud. Trojan boy, too. Taz, voice of experience yet again. Well, it's unanimous, isn't it, almost? Say goodbye to Dan. Hey, Dan. Dan, are you 21? Have a beer. All right, win the round number, says three. And we got down where we have five people left on each team. That'd be six wins. Is that a six win? All right, it's a six win. Not yet, thank you. I still have jeopardy to worry about. And your ethical question, each of you will answer and see how long did I give you for this one. You have 22 seconds. You've got that extra second now. How far are you willing to go to get rid of kitty porn sites? I don't think there should be a stop to even, I don't think you should even think about trying to stop to put an end, to stop putting an end to it. It shouldn't have even started in the first place. I mean, it's horrible. And these kids, they might not even be aware of it, but I mean it's just screwing them up forever and it's a horrible, horrible thing and it should be stopped as soon as it can. They called it before. Time. We should definitely go to the fullest extent of the law to prosecute and find the little sick weirdos. Kitty porn is something we absolutely need to stop, but it starts at home with everybody. If people were better...  Personally, it's something I wouldn't want to get involved with because I don't like going anywhere near it. The fight against kitty porn by reporting them to the ISPs is fairly good so far, but it's not as effective as it could be.  Oh, really?  None of us should do it. It's not a good thing. Trust me. We should do what she said about hunting and stuff. Judges, what did you hear that you liked and didn't like? I was happy that people didn't want to resort to vigilanteism, which can be very dangerous. I thought it was a wise statement to say that stopping it begins at home. I think that's... Because if people would just exercise a little restraint with their daughter's friends when, I think... Can we vote off a judge? He wants Justice Goggins to be impeached. To retain Justice Goggins. They're appointed for life. Sorry, guys. Okay. Audience, this is your choice. By round of applause, the answer you like the most. Starting over here with this gentleman. Let's hear it for him. For the lady.  For the spammer. For Oklahoma. And for our last contestant. Judges, is it pretty clear who's going? Say goodbye. Team B. Team 2. Team 2. Thank you, Judge. It's going to cost me $100 every time you do that, isn't it? Your ethical dilemma is you are a student. It could be high school. It could be college. You were up all night on IRC. Instead of studying for your test, then you got an F. It's going to mess up your college or high school education real bad. As you're in your professor's classroom, you notice that he is logged on to the grading system. What do you do? Starting with you. Logged in terminal. Nobody's around. Nah.  I got to take the fall for it. Well, I wouldn't do anything either because you'd probably get caught. So it's not an ethical question. With all the good university security. You pointed out to the professor and just make sure to note extra credits as a possibility. You got to take the fall. You can't do that. Nothing ever really kills your career anyway, so you'll be okay. But if there's that one person I really can't stand, I'd make sure they fail too. I would just have to point out to them that they're still logged on and start asking them every day, where's the extra credit and how long till I completely fail this class? Richard, we haven't heard from you. What are you thinking of these answers? I think they were all the same. It makes voting one of them off pretty hard. You'd have to do it by other criteria. Like just who you like better. All right, well, it's not up to you. It's up to the audience. Round of applause for who you want to keep. The next gentleman for surviving Dan and for our last lady. Judges, who goes? How about the double judging guy because it's irrelevant. Judges are too slow. Okay, bad thoughts guy. The bad thoughts guy? Bad thoughts guy has to go. Well, give him a round of applause for playing. Well, thank you. Wait a minute, consolation prize. Because he wouldn't do it because he would get caught. And we don't like people who get caught. Well, we're winding it down and you're learning about the ethics about some of these people. And this one, we'll start with team A for a change. How do you propose to get parents involved with their kids online safety if the parents are absolutely totally clueless and the kids run the computers? The best way to do that even for completely clueless people is to just put the computer in the living room and they can see if you're looking at porn or whatever. All parents need to do to get involved is to take a little bit of interest in their kid, let their kid run it, they can watch and learn from there. I think the best idea is to actually get some quality time with the parents and kids, have them both sit down at the computer, let the kid drive because he knows what he's doing, just have the parent reading the same webpage the kid is as the kid's reading it. The parents should definitely watch what the kids are doing online. I mean, there is absolutely nothing wrong with your mom or dad walking in on you and seeing what you're doing online, whether it's an ICQ check or a webpage. I have to apologize to about 1% of the population but I think the best way to keep kids offline and from doing bad stuff is giving them a Mac. A Mac. Okay. Team B. Team B. Team 2. Based upon what you've heard and what you're going to be up against in the next few rounds, who do you as a group want to throw off? Keep Oklahoma. Okay, who's the spokesman over there? I was sort of unilaterally elected. Who do we... I'm sorry, we're going to have to vote off Oklahoma over there. I want to know why? Why did you vote off Oklahoma? I'm speaking for the group, nothing personal. What? I'm speaking for the group, nothing personal. But why? Why did you want to vote her off? They say too smart for her own good. Too smart? She's too smart so you want her off so you can win. So they threw her off because she was too good. Team B. Team 2. And I can't even get rid of the judges. Team 2. Schools, grade schools, high schools and middle schools. Teachers are by and large pretty clueless about the technology. They don't know about the security problems. How do we get the schools and the teachers to start building in cyber ethics and awareness of security into the elementary and middle level school curriculum? I actually left high school for that reason because they were dimwits and then I just kind of went to college. Screw the whole high school thing. I think that you should just get new teachers that are just coming out of college and are in training and stick them in there, either that or send the teachers to training. That's called union busting, right? My high school actually had a class that dealt with all cyber ethics and used the computers. And actually the kids that actually knew what were going on, they ran the whole show.  You've got to spend money on the problem and give money to help educate the teachers and make it part of their certification requirements for new teachers and re-certification or just continuing education for the existing ones. Go back to your alma mater, high school, elementary, whatever and offer to teach them, we know what we're doing, why can't we pass along the knowledge? Actually it's not something I think that you can have deliberately worked into a school curriculum. They're going to have to get nailed pretty hard network-wise before they're going to realize that this is something they have to teach. They're going to have to get burned before they get off the butts and do something. Team A, who do you want to throw off now of Team 2? Judges, who do you like up there? You can elect not to take this case if you'd like. You know, we saw what you did last time.  So this court chooses not to accept this case? Well, you're asking the crowd. They're voting. No, they're voting. You're asking the small crowd if there are four people. After the lower judicial body rules we will decide whether to review that decision. All right, who do you want to throw off? That's the way it really works. You notice you didn't do that for Oklahoma, though. Oh, Team A, who goes? Tank top boy over there. Why? Why do you want him to go? Because he thinks it's more important to let people suffer from a problem before he tries to fix the problem. Well, thank you for playing. Wait a minute, Win. The judges would like to know who Oklahoma wants to throw off of Team 2. Throw off the guy with the hat. He's too good. Jennifer, it's amazing that you're redesigning this game on the fly here. I have no control over any of this. But we're down to four people now on each team. And Team A. Team A, very simple question. In the corporate world. In the corporate... No, sorry. That's wrong sheet. That's these eyes here. How much monitoring of a child's online activity should be done by parents? What sort of monitoring should they do and should they do it with or without the knowledge of their kids? Individual question. You each have 30 seconds. Like I said, putting the computer in the living room is a good thing. Kids, kids between 6 and 16. Why is that corporate? It's not. I've misread it. It's the eyes. It's old eyes, okay? It's not even the beer yet. Wait for Jeopardy. Like I said, putting the computer in the living room is a good thing. And it's not necessary to stand over their shoulder. But while they're online, you can sit there and watch TV and just glance over what they're watching. And yes, you should do it with their knowledge because it's not nice to do it without their knowledge. You need to do it with your children's knowledge. They need to know that what they want to look at is okay and you'll help them understand it if they have any problems with it. Or if it's something that you think is wrong. Your kids need to know that you are paying attention. Maybe you can go to the Paranoia Factor so they don't know what you're looking at. It'll kind of let them look at what they want and then you can go and talk to them about it afterwards. They should spend some time with the kids. Watch what they're doing as they're doing it, too. Not speaking from experience or anything. But I definitely think the parents should not tell at least at first just because you said 6-year-olds. 6 to 16. I prefer if you didn't describe to your 6-year-old what they could find out there and how to do it because no matter how hard you watch they're going to find it eventually. But once they become teens definitely talk to them about it and use whatever software is necessary and available. Okay. Audience, by round of applause, who's answer did you like the most? The ladies' answer. The next gentleman. The spam shirt. And the last gentleman. Judges, is it as obvious as I think? It is. The spam shirt. Thank you for playing. Give them a hand. Mr. Spam, please approach the front to collect your... How old are you, Spam? Team B. Two. Team two. Before she snags me on this one. If hacking is not against the law in another country yet hacking something inside that country might be beneficial to the good of the United States would you hack them and why? Especially if it was France. The timekeeper says yes, because it's there. I'm going to have to go, yeah, because if Russia is building a massive nuclear strike force against us I want to know about it and help the country. Russia? Well, since laws are a reflection of the moral view of a particular society if it's not legal or if it's not illegal in that country to do it then they don't have a moral issue against it, at least not yet so it makes sense to me that it's okay to go ahead and do that. I would say no. The net in its ideal form has no boundaries like countries or languages or religions and who knows what your home country has up its sleeve? I'd have to say if hacking is legal in that country and it's not here, take a trip over there, hack it because they should be well prepared if hacking is allowed in that country and get it there, otherwise you're messing up with the boundaries and stuff like that. I hear dissent in the audience. All right, it's time for the audience to do your voting. Let's hear it. Do we want to keep them? The Cold War survivor. Get on Air France and hack the bastards. The women who wants to save our country from nuclear war was the least favorite of the audience. Well, thank you for your attempts at saving our country. Thank you for playing. If there is extra water everybody up here would like a little if that's at all possible. All right, team A. Team A, your question is getting close here and you guys now have to make some decisions of working together or against each other. When is it okay to break into a computer without permission? Team A, individual answers. 32 seconds. I'd say it's only okay to break into a computer without permission is without permission.  Yeah! The only time you should be able to break into a computer without permission is when you're trying to prevent the loss of life or damage to an individual and when it's in the best interest of the country but not when the government is not telling us. Well, it's really only ethically okay to break into a computer if you have the permission of the owner. Judges, what do you guys think? What do you guys think? I think these guys are goody goodies. What's our Mr. Goggins thing, Judge? Well, I think the first guy gave the best answer. Okay. Richard. Thanks. We made an awful lot of presumptions about what you couldn't know about what somebody was doing before. So I really thought the most logical answer consistently was hers because she said she wouldn't have known. The conditions didn't make the conditions part of her thinking. She just knew it was wrong to do it. So the other guys were trying to make it sound like they could justify it, but you never know when those conditions are met. Sarah, what do you think? She agrees. Okay. Sir, of your two teammates, who do you want to get rid of? Uh-huh. Pick one of them. Can I do a suicide? No. Suicide's immoral. Wampus? Okay. Wampus, who do you want to get rid of? Him. Well, this means that you have the ultimate choice. One of them goes and it's your call. Pick up the microphone, please. Suicide is not an option. We're not in Holland. All right, team B. Two. Two. I got it. I got it. I know. I need a beer. Come up with one believable scenario when it is permissible to release a computer virus into the wild. To hunt down another more destructive virus. I can't think of any better reason than that. Virus, which patch something for people who are clueless, then I guess it would be okay. Sarah is a virus expert internationally renowned. I'd like her thoughts on these answers. Well, like, I've never seen anything done with a virus that I couldn't do just as well if not better without making itself replicate, which is, I think, more responsible. So I wouldn't say any of those answers would do it for me, but probably somebody who doesn't work for an antivirus company might want to answer. Anybody else? Well, sitting here looking at Jennifer and knowing recent past, it seems like someone just wrote a piece of software that went out and attacked things and tried to patch bind versions. Oh, let's hear it for the beer, guys. Oh, my God. Slight beer break. She wants one. The stagehand would like a beer, and I'm actually going to have one. I don't need two. We have a brief recess while the beer is distributed to the court. Thank you. Thank the beer, dude. Okay. Tanktop. Who would you like to get rid of? Why do you want to get rid of her? My microphone, please. Well, they both gave good answers. I'm going to leave it up to chance. Okay. Dan, who do you want to get rid of? Can I borrow the coin? No coin. The judges ruled no coins. Yeah, but now they just amended the Constitution quite clearly. Okay. Since I agreed with him on the question, I'll agree with him on the result. Well, give it up for her. She did great. She did great. Now, it's getting tough out here that four contestants left. Give it up for them. They've been hanging in there. They're surviving. They're surviving. And team A, your cyber-ethical dilemma. Oh, Richard doesn't like the time. You have 1.11246 minutes for your answer.  I'll put it on the PowerPoint. And you have a Swiss watch, right? If you could rewrite one cyber crime law that would enhance ethical behavior, what would it be? It's unfortunately suggested by Lana, but I was thinking of, because of my good friend Tyler. The DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, reverse many of its provisions. Laws are designed to protect the people, and all the DMCA does is protect corporations. Take it off the books. Team B, which of these two people do you want to get rid of? They get to choose. I'm sure. And if it's wrong, just... Okay.  Why? We thought his answer was more eloquent. You thought her answer was more eloquent? His. His answer is more eloquent eloquent than her answer. Yes. Do you agree? Sir denied.  I mean the court will not review the lower decision. They uphold the decision. Thank you for playing. You know, come on guys, he doesn't want to win so bad. Team B, two. Team two. Each of you answer the following in 1.11245 minutes.  Well, if it's a friend of yours, the first thing you have to do is go talk to them and find out, you know, tell them you know about it, ask them why they're doing it, try and figure it out. And if that doesn't help, then you have to take it to the next level. If it's a colleague, you have to go to your employers, and if it's a company, you work for the DOJ. They get it sanctioned. Tanked up. I'd say distance yourself as much as possible from this associate as you can, and watch him dig his own grave. If he's violating laws of that severity, he's going to get nailed. Let him go down in flames. Now, you're going to have to face one of these gentlemen for the final round. Who do you choose to face? Who do you choose to get rid of? I have to ask the gentleman wearing a full shirt to say goodbye. All right, the DOJ held in there, though. DOJ did good. They always stick around until the very end. Justice, you want your consolation prize? Yeah, you. You want your consolation prize, Justice? Where's acetone? She needs her beer. Did acetone want a beer? Here she comes. Everybody wins at ethical survivor. Okay, the final question for the whoever's going to end up being the winner here. For children under the age of 16 who do some illegal hacking cause some serious damage, what should we do with them legally? What should we do with their parents? And what is the ultimate recourse that you would design for this country? Team A, you go first. How do you deal with the kids? What do you do? Do you do the parents? You do the kids? What are the laws? What has to be done? I'll have to start with, depending on the nature of the crime, whether it's a violent crime or if it does cause someone to die. Serious financial damage is no physical violence. That's it? Just to continue on the previous streak, if it is a serious crime in terms of it could result in someone's death, then I would first say the child. I understand it's not violent, but if there's like a medical problem and the person dies, that sucks. Then the under 16 year old should be tried under normal circumstances. They should probably take like a year of jubilee or something and then remain with their parents under observation with while taking cyber ethical classes hopefully offered by some of you gentlemen and ladies. Alright, let's hear it for him. Tank's up! That's the perpetrator. It's on. I think that the perpetrator should be charged by the severity of the effects of what he had done. I also think that he should, after whatever punishment is handed out be forced to go to assistant min boot camp and should spend time cleaning up the messes of other such attacks. I also think that the youth's parents should be educated to bring them up to speed with the kids basically level of skill and knowledge. Judges, what do we think about these answers? What do we think about these answers? To request an amicus brief from Oklahoma. I personally have to say that I like this guy's answer better. Sending a kid to assistant min boot. First of all, the parents should be notified. There is nothing more humiliating to someone under 16 and I know from personal experience having your parents find out you can make a computer crime. If the parents don't take action, they should be tried according to the severity of the crime. If it is a crime that causes financial damage equal to grand larceny, then the child should be tried as an adult. Otherwise, they should be tried as a juvenile into file. Just before we get into the judge, I just want to make a quick announcement about a little later this evening, before everybody runs off. Many of you may know or remember a lovely lady by the name of Kitty. Bad Kitty is not here this year. She is taking her final exams to become an elementary school teacher. So we have won an international search for a new Vanna vinyl and we have found her. Oklahoma. She was penthouse center full January 1985. You will have the opportunity to meet her night tonight in this room at 11 p.m. for Hacker Jeopardy, but I'm going to hand this back to Jennifer. The judges thank Oklahoma for her opinion and look forward to her ruling someday when she's judged. But for now, the doctor wins. No, no, no. The opinions. But the doctor should win. Okay. Ultimately, you choose the winner. I think we are appealing to the Supreme Court and what does the Supreme Court say? You know, the thought of Jeff Moss having to give someone, she's only 15, so think about how many Def Con she can go to. The thought of Jeff Moss eating that much money after how much he makes off of us every year. Congratulations. You've got Def Con for life. We also there's there's a reason for this too. Some of us have been shocked and a little grieved at the degree to which the cyber ethics game really did focus on ethics. Where is the old hacking ethos? We said, where is the spunk, that vitality that drives you to go across boundaries no matter what, to get what you need in order to have your parents notified when you're less than 16 that you have done it. We think she has the spunk of a real hacker in her heart. Well, I can't thank you enough for helping to make this first annual game such a success. Oklahoma, congratulations. We'll hook up later. We'll get your details to get you everything. Thank you, California. Thank you. And hopefully we'll see you again here next year and do it again. Thank you.


Thank you for the introduction and mostly thank you for having us as Echie here to help the Ethereum Foundation and the development of Ethereum. We are a mobile development studio from Czech Republic, Prague, so our office is somewhere over there. And we are one of the grantees and we have developed a library which I will speak about later on, just some of our background. Like I said, we are here from Prague and we are quite a big company, not a startup anymore with over 50 team members. Basically, we develop mobile apps, but by mobile app there is also some backend and things like this. And we have quite a strong research background as well. That's why we try to connect the two words together, the word of blockchain and the word of mobile apps. And besides this cool stuff with blockchain, our regular work are applications like a new application for Bundestag, but that's another topic. What we did here is this project which I will introduce at Friday, so I will not speak about it too much now, but it's the library and code gain for Ethereum for IOS. And basically, it allows mobile developers who are developing native mobile apps on IOS to work with Ethereum smart contracts like if it was an SDK. So there's no need to parse the web interface anymore. It's already released as an open source. If you're interested in this stuff, you can come to my Friday talk. And besides that, I will just mention two other projects we do. And I've asked Jims if it's okay to mark here, Tezos, but blockchain is one big family as I was told. So that's not a problem. We also do similar stuff for Tezos Commons Foundation. And we also have one, our own app, which is fun because I was sitting near Tom and he presented here Rock Paper Scissors, which we have as well. But our use case is completely different. This is an app we had in store for about two years. It was just a result of our weekend hackathon. And it was where it's centralized. You can send these messages over, not blockchain, but Facebook Messenger. And lately, we have implemented there an option to make bets in tokens, which we have used kin tokens for because it works quite well as well. And it's based on Ethereum. So this app will be in the store in about two weeks. So Rock Paper Scissors is really a good use case for blockchain. And besides that, I would like to invite you for some events that will be occurring this week. So at Thursday, if you would be more interested in the DevKit, we have developed for Ethereum Foundation. We will have some kind of hands-on workshop for developers in our office. You can freely come there. It's listed on EmdBright, so just register there. It's called Ethereum's iOS DevKit hands-on workshop hosted by Echee. And there we will demonstrate how to create a native mobile app that calls Ethereum smart contracts in less than one hour. At least this is what our developers promise. And of course, there will be discussions. So you are invited to come. And I guess at Friday, I will officially announce it here in the ultraviolet room. And I would also like to invite you, because the whole week, there is a series of site events which is called Parag Blockchain Week. So you can check on ParagBlockChainWeek.com and there is plenty of events for each night. It's not during the day, during the conference. And some of them take place in our office. So if you would be interested, these events happen in our office, which you will find looks like this. We are in the very top of this building. This is how it looks like. And this is our team. And we will be happy to meet with you. Thank you.


So thank you very much to organize, thank you very much to IHS for the opportunity to give this small series of talks on one of my favorite topic and let me start with. So, Vladimir Vladimirovsky in six, so the number in is of papers and preprints is taken from the excerpt of my talk, so Vladimir Vladimirovsky in six and then to the category of frame correspondences is a hope to give a new construction of the stable material that is more friendly for computational purposes. Currently with Gankusha, we use frame correspondences to developing for a period of frame models. The latter theory allowed us to give in five and to give in five a genuinely local construction of SH. In my lectures, I will recall the definition of frame correspondences and will describe the genuinely local construction of SH. Provided that the base up is infinite and I will also discuss the application. And now let me properly pass to my first lecture. So here is actually one. The nearest thing of this lecture is this rich couple of smooth varieties of Y and X or K. We will recall the definition of pointed set frame Y to X of stable frame correspondences. Sorry. And pointed some crucial sets, these two, frame delta dot X tensor S1 and frame delta dot S1. Both of them are described in terms of algebraic variety as we will see below. Here is a question. What can we state about the formatopi groups? Here we have one. The same crucial set frame delta dot S1 has the formatopi type of the classical topological space omega infinity sigma infinity of the circle. That is, we recovered the topological space omega infinity S1, sigma infinity S1. And the same crucial set frame delta dot S1, which is described in terms of algebraic varieties only. This is one of the computational miracles of the frame correspondences. Here in one two, we take the mentioned space, the mentioned same crucial set frame delta dot X tensor S1, and take in termatopi groups, you can find a three-efficient zimotn. And from other side, we take the topological space X1 plus its third suspension and take the stable formatopi group of this first suspension with zimotn three-efficient, where X is a smooth complex of the prior varieties. And R is an integer at least zero. So the result is that these two groups coincide. The latter result is an extension to material stable formatopi context. And on the left side, we have the solution complex of X tensor S1 of the simplicial scheme X tensor S1 of the simplicial scheme. And we take its homology with finite pre-efficient zimotn. And on the right-hand side, we have again the first suspension of the space X plus smash of the space X plus. And we take its usual single homology with finite pre-efficient zimotn. So in a certain sense, as I will explain below in lectures, this frame correspondences, stable frame correspondences, is a very good replacement in the stable formatopi material context for the finite pre-efficient zimotn. This is core, which are due to VWOSC and which plays a central role in usual motivic business of VWOSC. So in 1.3, that may be an infinite perfect field, and it may be its field extension. Not necessarily finite. Then for each smooth variety S over K, and each arc, which is at least zero, we can take from one side this simplicial space, frame delta dot three capital, comma S tensor S1. And take is ordinary homotopy groups. And from other side, we can take the motivic space X plus smash S1, take its P1 suspension spectrum, take the A1 homotopy shift of way zero of this spectrum, and evaluate the shift on the field K. The theorem 1.3 states that the left hand side canonically coincides with the right hand side. So these are theorems I will take back over my course. But the in the first lecture, I would like to formulate this theorem properly. For that, I need to recall the definition of stable frame correspondences and some other definitions which are VWOSC. So let me do it. Firstly, I recall the notion of a tiny neighborhood of Z, sorry, a tiny neighborhood of Z in a scheme S, Z is equal to a sub-site in S. So this is a triple W pi S satisfying the following condition. Pi is a natal morphism. Pi precomposed with S coincide with the closed inclusion Z into S. That's S is a closed embedding. And the image with respect to pi of Z coincide with the image of Z under the map S. Let me draw a picture to make the picture more, this definition has more things. So here is S, here is Z, this is closed embedding I, this is my W, here is my ital morphism pi, and here is my closed embedding S. So obviously the diagram can be used. As I told pi is a tie, the diagram can be used means pi precomposed with S coincide with the closed embedding. And there is also this condition that pi in S of Z coincide with S of Z. So very informally speaking you could take P to be the complex numbers and replace ital neighborhood by the strong neighborhood. And in this case the picture will look as follows. Take it closed ZB, say closed complex of variety, and then take a rather refined neighborhood in strong topology. This will be your W. So I also like to say that if you have another ital neighborhood like this, then a morphism between W prime and W, between two neighborhoods which I have drawn is a morphine row between W prime and W, such that this row triangles commute. Particularly row is automatically ital. So with this in hand, I am able to give the major definition which is Dupoevo-Vivotsky. Similarly, a definition firstly of S V C prime correspondences of level N and then definition of A prime correspondences of level N. So, for case morph schemes Y and S and an integer N which is at the level, an exit prime correspondence pi of level N consists of the following data. Firstly, a closed subset Z, let me maybe draw this in a nice way. So the data are the following. A closed subset D in Y cross K N, this closed subset is supposed to be finite over Y. And an entire neighborhood view of this closed subset in Y cross K N functions pi 1, pi N, which gives us a morphine from U to A N, such that the common vanishing of this functions is the closed subset Z, in U. The subset Z will be referred as the support of the correspondence. We should also write triples pi like this or quadruples pi like that to denote exit frame correspondences. Also, one should say that frame correspondences, two frame correspondences like Z, U, pi, G and D prime, D prime side, D prime occult equivalent provided that the following condition holds Z coincide with D prime and the second condition is there is a common refinement of neighborhood U and U prime, a common refinement W such that G restricted to W coincide with G prime restricted to W and pi restricted to W coincide with pi with Psi restricted to W. In this condition holds we call explicit frame correspondences to be equivalent. The frame correspondence of level 10 is an equivalent class of explicit frame correspondences of level 10.  We let frame N between Y and X, you know the set of frame correspondences from Y to X of level 10. And it is a pointed set with the base point being the class zero N of the explicit frame correspondences with U equal the empty scheme. I mentioned that the set frame nodes between Y and X of the correspondences of level zero, with a set of pointed morphisms between Y plus and X plus. Next, we would like to define a composition of frame correspondences to get eventually a category of frame correspondences frame part of K. So to define composition of frame correspondences, take a frame correspondence of level M and take a frame correspondence of level M. And define the composition as a frame correspondence of level M plus M between Y and X. So here we go from Y to X and here we go from X to S. So the composition is expected to go from Y to S and this is the case. And we should take firstly Z cross Z prime over X as the support of the correspondence. Its neighborhood is supposed to be U cross U prime over X. And here there is closed embedding which is S versus S prime. And we have function or better say morphisms phi cross psi from U cross U prime to AM cross AM. And it's given by the family of functions phi, pre-composed with pre-composed so a string of function phi and psi. And what is morphisms from U cross U prime to S? It is given like this. Firstly we project to U prime from here we project to U prime and then we have morphisms to prime to S. So this way we bought what we call the composition of frame correspondences of frame correspondences which is the correspondence of level M plus M between Y and S. So it is not difficult to check that this composition of specific correspondences respects the equivalence relation on the M and defined associative maps between frame M, Y to X and frame X to S to frame M plus M, Y to S. And in this in fact we are ready to define our category of frame correspondences, namely its objects are those of smooth varieties and the morphisms are given by the sets frame plus plus Y between Y and X. It is the book here, the book here of frame and Y to X along all non-negative quintages. I recall that frame and Y to X are pointed sets and therefore the book here is redefined. So this category frame plus of P is called the category of frame correspondences. Also as a category frame not of P, all this category frame plus of P, its objects are those of smooth and morphisms are given by the sets frame not Y to X, which are pointed morphisms between Y plus and X plus. So the category frame plus of K has the zero object. The zero object is the empty scheme. A frame, but to say a frame pointed, is a point to set on the category frame plus of K. The components, the composition of two frame correspondences in certain couple phases is taken in a very easy way. Namely, if F is another morphism between Y prime and Y, and pi is a level and correspondence of this form, then pi precomposed to the set is given by this simple formula. So level and between Y prime and X. And also if you take morphism between two varieties, a morphism of level zero, then H composed with pi is given by this simple formula, namely we precompose H with G and the rest is the same as for pi. So the category is defined, and it gives a good aspectivity to define the set of stable frame correspondences, frame Y to X. But before that, I need to recall one more way of definition, namely, given the case of scheme X, there is a distinguished morphism, scheme S, often called the suspension in pivot direction. It is a morphism of level one from X to itself, and it is defined by this explicit frame correspondence. So here X cross node is the support, and it lies in X cross A1, the italian Ibarcu is X cross A1 itself, T is written for the projection to A1, and projection to X is taken for G. So we need to take morphism to X, and the morphism we take is the projection to X. For each integer N, which is at least zero, defined using this sigma X define a pointed set morphism, sigma capital X, between level N frame correspondences to level N plus one frame correspondences. It takes a level N-respondence phi to sigma X, we can call this phi. Explicitly, sigma X takes the frame-respondence of level N of this form to the frame-respondence of level N of this form. So the support is equal to zero, its neighborhood is U cross A1, and there will be N plus one function, maybe the N functions are the previous one, phi one, phi N, and the last function is the projection to the last coordinate. The function G is replaced with the full N1, we add a morphism to G to X, and we recompose it with projection to U. Now we can give the definition of the set of stable frame correspondences between Y and X. It is just a collimit of this string. I should mention, which I did not, that this sigma X, sigma capital X, is an injection of pointed sets. This is an obvious picture. So roughly speaking, we could take, not roughly speaking, but exactly speaking, this collimit is just the union of mentioned pointed sets, and it's called the set of stable frame correspondences. What I didn't mention above, let me mention this right now, that for each frame-respondence of level zero between X and X prime, there is this equality, which I will draw as a picture of this form. We can take sigma X prime, recomposed with F, and we can take F recomposed with sigma X, and this equality means that the diagram comes. This is essential for what I will say right now. Namely, if F is a frame-respondence of level zero, then the assignment, which takes five to F recomposed with five, define a frame pre-shift morphism. A flow of star from the pre-shift frame delta bar X to the pre-shift frame delta bar X prime. Also, I would like to stress that this pre-shift and this pre-shift, they are all to, they are in fact mis-nevic shifts by a lemma due to we were asking. So, but what I would stress that there is this covariant morphism, there is this morphism, defined by a correspondence of level zero between X and X prime, particularly frame by bar X. So, as I told you, this frame bar X is a frame pre-shift. Since it is a frame pre-shift, therefore we can restrict it to the category smooth, and we get a pointed pre-shift on smooth. And since F flow of star is a frame pre-shift morphism, particularly it is F flow of star is a pointed pre-shift morphism on smooth. So, let me go one step. Next, namely, the nearest aim is to define these two simplicial pre-shifts, which I, about them, I use them to formulate here in the beginning of my lecture. So, this is my nearest aim is to define these two simplicial sets. For that, let sin flow of star, I will just pronounce in star, with the category of finite pointed sets and pointed morphism and pointed maps. For a scheme X, and define it non-pointed set A, I will write X under A for the scheme like this, which is the co-product of several many copies of X indexed by elements in A. I would stress that categories in star, smash product in the unit object one plus, and frame note of page, the Cartesian product cross, and the object point, the unit object point are the symmetric monoidal categories. And there is a fully faithful embedding in taking a pointed set K to the scheme of this form, where star is the distinguished point of K. So, taking the set K, the scheme spec K under K capital minus the distinguished point. And taking a morphism phi, I call this morphism, respects the distinguished point to the morphism of this form. So, I didn't do this in the file between spec K under K capital and spec K under K capital. Maybe I should say here, is everything okay? Yes, it's okay. Okay, I continue. Thank you. Yeah, so I should comment a little bit. So, what I need to define is a morphism enough phi, which belongs to morphism in frame note of K, between enough K and enough A. But this is equal to pointed morphism set between themes in of K plus and in of A plus. And I specifically written down that the left hand side here is exactly the in K plus. And the right hand side here is exactly the in A plus. So, what I need to do and so we have also this plus gives me this equality and this plus gives me this equality. So, what I need to take to specify a pointed morphism between this scheme and this scheme. So, what I need to do is to take this morphism identity number phi as the specification. It is a pointed morphism. So, this way, I defined this way, I defined fully faithful embedding of the category in star into the category frame note of K. And I would stress that this font in is strictly monoidal. The categories of simpatic objects, frame delta of simpatic objects, and in categories in star and frame note of K, asymmetrical monoidal in the standard way as well. So, the font in is a fully faithful embedding between these two categories, which are the categories of simpatic objects in star in frame star and in frame note of K. The left of the font is strictly monoidal too. Now just couple notation. Let X dot be in delta op frame note of K and let K dot be in delta op of in star, a pointed simpaticial set in this category. Write X dot tensor K dot for the object X dot cross in of K dot. I recall that in of K dot is already an object in this category. And in this category, the cross product is monoidal. So explicitly X dot tensor K dot, and we like to take its n simpatic, it will be X dot tensor K dot. So, continuing, it will be X dot cross, sorry, n, and this is a pointed set, this is a pointed simpatic. So this will be, no, this is just a simpatic. And I also will write K dot for the object in of K dot in delta op frame note of K. Particularly for the simpaticial circle S1, which is a simpaticial object in the category in star. In the same X, which is small, we have objects, X and the first one, and this one in the category delta op of frame note of K. This is very good. So, since the pointed set frame of stable frame correspondences between Y and Y prime, is a covariant, is covariant factorial with respect to Y prime with respect to morphine in frame note of K. So, we get pointed simpaticial sets frame Y comma X tensor S1 and frame Y comma S1. Due to this covariant functoriality in the second variable, functoriality in frame note of K, and our objects X tensor S1 and S1, they are simpaticial objects in frame note of K. So, these two objects are simpaticial sets. So, replacing Y with the standard posse-impecial scheme delta dot K, we get pointed by simpaticial sets, frame delta dot comma X tensor S1 and frame delta dot comma S1, respectively. Eventually, applying the diagonal, we get the simpaticial sets, we get the simpaticial set, that we denote also frame delta dot X tensor S1 and frame delta dot S1. So, all these simpaticial sets are well defined eventually and frames 11, 12 and 13 are stated properly now. I would say that this is the end of first part of my first lecture, and I have about 15 minutes, little bit more for the second part of my lecture. So, the second part of my lecture has subtitle, namely, the material function of the sigal theorem, and the meaning of this simpaticial set of this simpaticial shape, which is indeed a simpaticial shape. So, just a second, consider now the pointed material spaces P1, pointed by infinity, and the standard object, the pointed material space T, which is A1, a1, minus naught, regarded as the same shape. For a pointed material space M, you will write like this for the end T suspension of M, and you will write omega m P1 naive of M for the inner form from the end smash code of P1 with itself to M. So, there is a remarkable VW dilemma, which is a very key for this topic, which I decided to formulate in this form, which is a little bit unusual, but it is technologically equivalent to the original VW dilemma. Namely, this magic shape introduced on smooth varieties of a, introduce a bar, frame n bar comma x, just inside, economically isomorphic to the omega m P1 naive of sigma n T of x plus. Similarly, the shape of frame corresponding to this. Like this. Canonically coincide with omega infinity naive of sigma infinity naive of x plus. So, on the right-hand side, we could take the collimit and so on the right-hand side, the right-hand side is defined as the naive code limit of omega infinity and sigma n. So, due to this limba, it is not surprising that the motivic spaces of this form, which are the spaces of this form due to this limba plays a fundamental role in the stable motivic rheumatopi theory. Right below, I will make these stages a bit more precise. But before I would like to stress one principle. Namely, the phanta x goes to him or delta dot bar comma s, makes all the stable motivic rheumatopi theory local. This principle will be specified in the second lecture. This is quite the same as the phanta x takes to go to form delta dot bar comma x. So, this is the motif of x. Makes the viva theory of motives local. So, in certain sense, this simple shell shift in certain sense, not in a very precise sense is a substitute for m of x. At least this construction is very close to this one. Let us consider now the following picture. Take on the left hand side. Take on the left hand side points of motivic spaces and on the right hand side take p1 spectra. Not rheumatopi category, but just the category of p1 spectra and the category of point of motivic spaces. The right two funtons, one is the infinite suspension part of the phanta, with respect to p1 and another one is the naive omega infinity p1 loop phanta. They are two, we joined each to the other. This is the left one, this phanta is the right one. These two funtons induces the corresponding direct funtons, a1 direct funtons. Between the pointed unstable motivic category h of k and the stable motivic category sh of k. The left hand side phanta is still the infinite suspension phanta and the right hand side phanta is the a1 direct p1 loop phanta. So, shortly I prefer to write on the infinity p1 for this direct phanta. One of the major tasks of the stable motivic or motivic theory is to compute the motivic space like this, where x is the smooth variety. A similar task in top logic has been solved by the single machinery. The motivic version of the single theory. Let's be an infinite perfect field. Then there is a canonical morphism between the simple shift frame delta dot cross bar comma x times rs1. Omega infinity p1 sigma infinity t of x plus rs1. Such a canonical morphism exists due to the fact that on the left hand side we take the naive omega loops and on the right hand side we take a1 direct p1 loops. So, it's naturally to expect that there is such an error and this error exists and it states that this canonical error is a local theorem. Particularly, let k capital over k be a field extension not necessarily finite then this morphism we evaluate on the field k capital. And on the left hand side and you'll get a weak equivalence of official sets on the left hand side. We have the same official set frame delta dot k capital comma x times rs1 and on the right hand side we have. Omega infinity p1 sigma infinity t of x plus rs1 evaluated on k. So, this is a motivic space. So, this is a shift you can evaluate it on the field k capital and get a simple set. So, this error is a weak equivalence of a simple set. This theorem has a very nice and strong theory. Namely, if you take k to be the complex numbers and we take x to be the point. Then the homotopy group, homotopy groups of this simple set which is frame delta dot comma s1 coincide with the stable homotopy group of the classical circle s1. Let me derive this category from the theorem. So, firstly, this simple set is weakly equivalent to this simple set by because this error is a weak equivalence of simple sets. So, this is the true equality. The second equality caused by the very definition of the infinite loop p1 loop phanta a1 homotopy loop phanta or by the very definition of a1 homotopy group of this vector. So, what is on the right-hand side? On the right-hand side are the following group. We take the suspension, the t suspension spectrum of s1. We take the a1 homotopy shape of weight zero, weight zero. This is a shift and this shift we evaluate on the complex numbers. So, this equality holds up to by the very definition as I told of this function. And the last equality is a very deep theorem due to my theory. It says that a1 weight zero, a1 homotopy shape of say s1, particularly of s1, evaluated on complex numbers coincide with the corresponding stable homotopy group in topology. So, and eventually I would stress that this corollary has a stronger form, namely, that the space, the simplicial space frame delta dot s1 is weakly accurate to the topological space, omega s1 infinity, sigma s1 infinity of the usual topological circle. So, a kind of conclusion is this, that the usual topological space omega infinity, sigma infinity of s1 top is expressed as this simplicial set, which is defined in terms of algebraic varieties only. And also, since I have a couple more minutes, I will take back to my thesis, this one. Saying that this construction plays a central role in the stable motivic rheumatography theory, and it plays a central role due to the fact that up to some extent it makes all the stable motivic rheumatography theory local. And in the second lecture, this principle will be specified, but let us say clarified. So, we will make this principle quite precise. Thank you very much. This is the end of my first lecture. Thank you for now. Thank you for a very nice lecture. Maybe I can post the first question. Okay, that's the second ideal. Yeah, so, yes. Let's, let's go to theory, theorem 110. 110. Okay. Yeah, yeah. Okay, go. Yes, I should put here, as I already have done, I should put here smash as well. Okay. Can you get the maps in that theorem? I would like to say, only very few people earlier, and then a bit roughly. So, as I told, this is on the left hand side, we have a delta dot bar. And here is omega infinity naïve of sigma infinity. Okay, so from the infinity naïve, sigma infinity naïve, we have pretty obvious map to here. Just a transformation of omega naïve to omega infinity. Yeah, it gives an up. So, is it okay? Yes, thank you. Let's see, are there any other questions? Use a mic, sorry. Can you explain a little bit why you need k infinity in theorem 110? Yeah, in theorem 110. So, this theory of, I would say, this theory of frame motives, which is behind of the theorem, is written down in published papers for infinite field. And for field which is finite, there is, there are some reference due to the Georgianian and Paul, help me please. You're the form of PhD student. Jonas. Yes. And due to Jonas. Yeah, but which is preprint steel, preprint steel in the preprint form. I mean, surely one can replace k by, I mean, eliminate in and say, take any difference. It doesn't seem to be any other questions. One else. I think it means that your lecture was accepted. Thank you.


I'm Sam Vaknin and I am the author of Malignance of Lava, Narcissism Revisited. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual says that psychopaths and sociopaths are merely colloquial terms to describe someone with anti-social personality disorder. But scholars such as Robert Hare and Theodore Millen beg to differ. A psychopath has anti-social traits for sure, but these are coupled with and enhanced by callousness, ruthlessness, extreme lack of empathy, deficient impulse control, deceitfulness and sadism. Like other personality disorders, psychopathy becomes evident in early adolescence, and it is considered to be chronic. But unlike most other personality disorders, it is frequently ameliorated with age, and even tends to disappear altogether by the fourth or fifth decade of life. This is because criminal behavior and substance abuse are both determinants of anti-social personality disorder, and these behaviors are more typical of young adults than they are of old people. Psychopathy may be hereditary. Psychopaths' immediate family usually suffer from a variety of personality disorders. Psychopathy also has a strong genetic, biochemical and neurological component. The brains of psychopaths behave differently. The anti-social personality disorder is a controversial mental health diagnosis. A psychopath refuses to conform to social norms and to obey the law. He often inflicts pain and damage on his victims, but does that make his this pattern of conduct a mental illness? The psychopath has no conscience or empathy, but is this necessarily a pathological thing? Cultural-bound diagnosis are often abused as tools of social control. They allow the establishment, the ruling elites and groups with vested interests to label and restrain dissidents and troublemakers. Such diagnoses are frequently employed by totalitarian states to harness or even to eliminate eccentrics, criminals, dissidents and deviants. Like narcissists, psychopaths lack empathy. They regard other people as mere instruments of gratification and utility or as objects to be manipulated. Psychopaths and narcissists have no problem to grasp ideas and to formulate choices, needs, preferences, courses of actions and priorities, but they are shocked when other people do the very same thing. They are flabbergasted when they confront evidence that other people are autonomous, independent units. Most people accept that other people have rights and obligations. The psychopath rejects this quid pro quo. As far as he is concerned, only might is right. People have no rights and he, a psychopath, has no obligations that derive from a postulated social contract. The psychopath holds himself to be above conventional morality, above the law. The psychopath cannot delay gratification. He is a law unto himself. He wants everything and he wants it now. His whims, his urges cater into his needs and the satisfaction of his drives take precedence over the needs, preferences, wishes and emotions of even his nearest and dearest. Consequently, psychopaths feel no remorse when they hurt or defraud others. They don't possess even the most rudimentary conscience. They rationalize their often criminal behavior and intellectualize it. Psychopaths fall prey to their own primitive defense mechanisms such as narcissism, splitting and projection. The psychopath firmly believes that the world is a hostile, merciless place, prone to the survival of the fittest and that people are either all good or all evil. The psychopath projects his own vulnerabilities, weaknesses, frailties and shortcomings unto others and he forces them to behave the way he expects them to. This defense mechanism is known as projective identification. Like narcissists, psychopaths are abusively exploitative and incapable of true love and intimacy. Narcissistic psychopaths are particularly suited to participate in the give and take of civilized society. Many of them are misfeeds or criminals. White-collar psychopaths are likely to be deceitful and engage in rampant identity theft, the use of aliases on some lying, fraud and corner artistry for gain or sometimes for pleasure. Psychopaths are irresponsible and unreliable. They do not honor contracts, undertakings and obligations. They aren't stable, they are unpredictable and rarely hold a job for long, repay their debts or maintain long-term intimate relationships. Psychopaths are vindictive and they hold grudges forever. They never regret and they never forget a thing. They are driven, they are dangerous. Always in conflict with authority, frequently of the run, psychopaths possess a limited time horizon and seldom make medium or long-term plans. They are impulsive and reckless, aggressive, violent, irritable and sometimes the captives of magical thinking believing themselves to be immune to the consequences of their own actions. Thus, psychopaths often end up in jail having repeatedly flouted social norms and codified laws. Partly to avoid this fate and evade the law, partly to extract material benefits from unsuspecting victims, psychopaths habitually lie. They steal other people's identities, they deceive. They use aliases and they call for personal profit or pleasure as a diagnostic and statistical manual puts it. Psychopaths are said to be fearless and sanghua. Their pain tolerance is very high. Still, contrary to popular perceptions and psychiatric orthodoxy, some psychopaths are actually very anxious and fearful. Their psychopathy is a defense against an underlying and oppervasive anxiety, either hereditary or brought about by early childhood abuse and trauma.