Hi, oh, it is working. Hi Good evening. I'll wait maybe a few more seconds while people settle in But as you do let me introduce myself. I'm James and leaders I am chair of the physics department and it is my pleasure to introduce the 23rd annual annual J Robert Oppenheimer lecture Yeah So what I'm going to do right now is I'll give you an introduction to what the Oppenheimer lecture is about before I hand over to my colleague Professor Rafael Busso to introduce tonight's speaker The Oppenheimer lecture annual series was established in 1998 and it is made possible by the generosity of Jane and Robert Wilson as well as Steve and Eileen Krieger The series was brought has brought a who's who of physicists theoretical physicists from around the world Past Oppenheimer lecturers have included Sian Yang Freeman Dyson Helen Quinn Charlie Kane Andre Linda Murray Galman Steven Hawking kept thorn and Marvin Cohen who's joining us via zoom I believe Many prominent theorists in the fields of particle physics condensed metaphysics astrophysics cosmology and AMO have stood Where I am standing today Robert Oppenheimer was born in 1904 growing up in an upper-class Family in Manhattan. He graduated from Harvard majoring in chemistry entered Cambridge the other Cambridge across the Atlantic In 1924 as a graduate student hoping to work with Ernest Rutherford Who many of you may know is the second most famous New Zealand physicist He was then leaving in 1926 and so Oppenheimer finished his PhD with Max Born and Gottingen He published more than a dozen papers while with Born mostly focused on the new theory at the time of quantum mechanics This included his most famous born Oppenheimer approximation that simplifies molecular Physics by separating slow nuclear motion from the faster electron motion More than 90 years ago in 1929 After two years of postdoctoral study mostly in Europe Oppenheimer returned to the US He accepted an associate professorship right here in Berkeley where he remained for nearly 15 years During this period he published his famous paper with Volkov establishing the Tolman Oppenheimer Volkov limit on the maximum mass of a neutron star The mass of above which a star must collapse into a black hole He also developed the theory of that collapse in black hole formation Both topics are of keen interest today as many of you may know with the recent observation of gravitational waves From black hole and neutron star mergers At Berkeley Oppenheimer's group typically 8 to 10 graduate students and half a dozen postdocs met with Oppenheimer every day With Oppenheimer probing them about their progress Hans Bader noted that probably the most important ingredient he brought to his teaching was his exquisite taste He always knew where the important problems are The scientific leadership of Oppenheimer demonstrated at Berkeley complicated his later life and his role in science as many of you know In 1942 he was selected to lead World War II's Manhattan Projects engineering lab cited at Los Alamos near a ranch Oppenheimer owned His leadership of his effort culminated in the successful Trinity test and later the political decision to use atomic weapons against Japan A decision that troubled Oppenheimer for the rest of his life After World War II Oppenheimer Became the public face of science and technology featured on the covers of time and life magazines This period of his life came to a close with a controversial loss of his security clearance in 1954 That's his badge shown to the right there a Time when the new Cold War and McCarthyism were stoking fears There was some resolution about a decade later when President Kennedy presented Oppenheimer with the nation's Fermi award My notes say Kennedy, but this but the picture clearly shows Lyndon Johnson. I think but anyway One of them definitely gave him the award Oppenheimer's legacy at Berkeley is a simpler one summarized by a plaque on the fourth floor of physics South Hall With another quote from Hans Bader In these corners in these corner offices 1929 to 1942 Jay Robert Oppenheimer created the greatest school of theoretical physics. The world has ever known Berkeley physics strives to continue this legacy today So with that introduction it is now my great pleasure to introduce my colleague from UC Berkeley physics professor Rafael Bousso To introduce tonight's Oppenheimer lecturer Dr. Lenny Susskind Thank You James Well, it's a great pleasure and honor to introduce Dr. Leonard Susskind Lenny is a legend. He's also a friend and a mentor to me personally He has made many great discoveries and don't worry I will not tell you about all of them He's won great prizes like the Sakurai Prize What I want to talk about is how that's really just half of the picture Lenny more than Almost any other great theoretical physicists that I've had the privilege to meet has taught us how to think How to pick important topics How to tackle them and The best way that I can try to convey that is by by telling you the story of how I first met Lenny Which he probably doesn't actually know This was in 1994 and I was an undergrad I was trying to decide between grad school at Stanford or in Cambridge, England I didn't get in a Berkeley. Is anybody here? No Anyway, so so I went to Stanford to sort of check the place out and My hope was to meet with Andre Linde, but he had broken his leg so he couldn't meet with me after after all But but this guy comes running in wearing running shorts, sweaty shirt and And You know, I tell him I'm thinking about grad school. I'm interested in quantum cosmology and black holes and so on and and he sits me down and he gives me this this very clear lecture about How Stephen Hawking is completely wrong about black holes and This whole idea of the wave function of the whole universe is nobody who can see the whole universe doesn't make any sense and This completely shocked me I'd already spent a little bit of time in Cambridge and you know It's a place that definitely sees itself as the center of the universe and shall not be criticized So this was this was remarkable And I I went to Cambridge anyway But but what but what Lenny had explained to me He explained in such a way that it stayed and it planted a seed and even though I became Stephen's student And that was great. It was wonderful time. I Came to realize that Lenny was probably right about black holes and Stephen Hawking was wrong That information really does come out of black holes and is not lost And you know before you knew it Stephen Hawking decided that Lenny was right about black holes Now this is just an example of I think how Lenny operates. He's good at Making people think the right way about something. He's good at Guiding the field and for generations of Physicists coming and going he has he has guided us in the right directions. He's championed sometimes unpopular ideas and topics that people wouldn't touch and He's got a stellar record on those pics now. How did he do that? I Don't really know how to explain it. It's some sort of irresistible clarity in the way he thinks about things and conveys those thoughts It's it's a radical inevitability. It's some contradiction in You know You hear it at once. It's like my goodness. This is completely crazy. And yet you realize there's no other option and Fortunately, I don't have to explain it to you because we're about to hear Lenny explain some things to you So I welcome professor Leonard Saskint It's very nice to be here The last two and a half years. I haven't been more than 30 miles from my house I'm now about 35 miles from my house Wonderful Good, okay, so Thank You Raphael I've known the name Oppenheimer since 1945 when I was five years old Sometime after after August 6th, I think it was I asked my grandfather Grandpa, what's an atom bomb? He said that he didn't know how it worked, but he did know the one most important thing He said it was a giant bomb That had been built by a Jewish man named Oppenheimer. That's all I know about Oppenheimer For about 15 or maybe a little more years when I started to read his papers his physics papers In fact, I did read a number of them and one of them had a great influence on me a Paper with a young I'm sure he was a student or just a young physicist by the name of Heartland Snyder a brilliant young physicist That gave rise to the modern theory of black holes Even if it's not explicit Everything in my lecture today rep rests on the foundation that Oppenheimer and Snyder laid in 1939 Which by the way was a year before I was born Okay, let's begin I maintain that the biggest puzzle about physics is that it exists at all. I Don't mean that the laws of physics exist or that they are precise and mathematical I mean the fact that an animal whose closest relative is the chimpanzee Was able to ask about these laws There he is up there But was also able to navigate Through a sea of wrong ideas and eventually hit on relativity Quantum mechanics the standard model of elementary particles and more that is a Absolutely remarkable fact that is not a physics fact. It's probably a bio biology fact, but it just blows me away What are the tools that our ancestors used intellectual ancestors? I don't mean the monkeys I mean Newton Einstein and so forth. What were the tools that they used to be able to answer these questions? Well, there were theoretical tools for thought experiments apparent conflicts of principle paradoxes and of course mathematics But Some people would say the most important tool was of course experiment Today we're going to talk about a subject quantum gravity Which is so remote the scales of distance so infinitesimal the energy so enormous That direct experiment is entirely out of the question at least for now The phenomena that the phenomena which are at the intersection of quantum mechanics and gravity Quantum gravity to give it a name So we theorists are on our own Can we make progress? Well, it seems that we have made serious progress over the last two decades Maybe even revolutionary progress Okay, as I said The phenomena are so remote that the possibility of experiments is out of the question and it means we're really on our own We have made progress and I'm going to tell you some of the little pieces I'm not going to give you the whole story I couldn't possibly but I'm going to try to give you some feel for what some of the pieces have been That I think are adding up to a revolution Okay, so where are we the whole subject of quantum gravity probably goes back to the first day that anybody thought about quantum mechanics and thought about gravity But the modern era of it I think started in 1958 or sometime around then when theoretical physicists Asked the question should we quantize gravity now? What does quantize mean? Quantize was a an expression which meant a procedure a Procedure that you do on a classical system the classical system could be a harmonic oscillator It could be an atom. It could be electrodynamics ordinary electrodynamics The procedure which if you know about that procedure you recognize the equations If not, it doesn't matter. There are equations And the founders of the subject Paul Dirac finding do it Weinberg wheeler Hawking their attempts Were organized around trying to describe scattering processes Processes where particles come in and particles go out They interact under the influence of gravity and they hear in there. They may emit some gravitational waves Gravitons They'd invented Feynman diagrams for for gravitation Well, it was a disaster It was a disaster everything they tried to compute came out infinite or came out meaner us came out nonsensical and that led to What I would call an era of angst and Confusion a time when it just did not look as if quantum mechanics and gravity were compatible Now, how could they not come be compatible? I have to be compatible the world has both And we can't live in a world where of inconsistency And that was then how do you fit them together? Can you fit them together and looked impossible? Today the situation is different Today as far as we can tell Not only can gravity and quantum mechanics fit together But it's almost as if They were the same thing or two sides of a coin a single coin I'm going to tell you a little bit about some of the Things that went into that All right, I always start with digressions. I'm a great digressor.  You've probably all seen them the first holograms or something like this You had a region Inside a cavity of some sort and the cavity was not a cavity just a round region And the cavity the surface of the cavity was a film a photographic film And if you look carefully at that film even through a microscope all you would see it was little scratchy meaningless Rubbish noise It seemed to encode nothing nothing recognizable on the other hand if you shined light on it of the right kind It was called coherent light all of a sudden voila an Image would form but a three-dimensional image right in the middle of this cavity a Three-dimensional image of whatever it was that had been photographed. What is a hologram? From an abstract point of view a how a hologram is a two-dimensional mathematical representation of a three-dimensional portion of the world Now how do you manage to take a three-dimensional thing and map it into two dimensions? Well, it's possible, but it is always at the cost of the two-dimensional image being looking like a random hash How you put it back together again? That may be just shining light on it or it may be some much more complicated mathematical procedure But that's what a hologram is And what you can say about a hologram is that things are not where you think they are in the hologram the information the That's called the information of what is in the hologram is in the film The image is in the bulk what we today call the bulk Things or the information and coding things are not where you think they are. I want you to keep that in mind Now let's come back to quantum gravity in the 1990s. This was the period when Stephen Hawking and I were having our fun debating and Rafael was a student Thought experiments principally initiated by Stephen himself about black holes led to something called the holographic principle What was the holographic principle and what is the holographic principle today? It's the idea that a region of space With everything in it. It could be astronomical space. It could just be this room or even the whole universe that The information encoding everything taking place in this three-dimensional world is encoded on the boundary of that region as a kind of quantum hologram It's of course impossible for me to describe the mathematics of the quantum hologram here and we'll try But that's the message and again Things are not where you think they are or at least things are not where the information which is encoding them Would lead you to believe they are Okay, let's come back now to this idea that gravity and quantum mechanics may be so closely related That they really are just two sides of the same coin The Evidence for that is a whole bunch of parallels between gravitational phenomena We'll talk about what that means in a moment and quantum phenomena things that we had no idea what connected things from two radically different fields of physics are Turning out to be parallel to each other and perhaps even Not just related to each other, but the same thing The connection is through this holographic principle The gravitational phenomena of the phenomena which are like the image the three-dimensional image the encoding of That three-dimensional world is in the form of the quantum mechanical hologram Correspondences are correspondences between the two of these. So I'll give you some examples Let's go to the most primitive or basic of gravitational phenomena You all know what that that is if you've fallen out of bed that fallen out of bed a number of times regularly You know what gravitation is it's falling falling in a gravitational field and if I wanted to if I wanted to express it abstractly I would say that the Gravitational force just like any other force is a tendency for things to accelerate In this picture here the apple is accelerating. It's accelerating downward Caused by the gravitational field of the earth You can rewrite the you know the equation f equals ma of course you can rewrite that as f equals the rate of change of momentum The momentum of the apple is increasing as it falls So you can say that falling is the tendency for momentum to increase in the presence of a gravitational field That's one side of the coin the falling side The other side of the coin the quantum side is something so radically different that it's hard to imagine that it has anything to do with it You take some quantum system now this quantum system. I'm imagining is the quantum system encoding the hologram This bunch of squiggles and the and the random looking bits of information Out at the boundary of the region of interest And you come along and you tap the system you perturb the system You might you might hit it with an extra electron or you might do whatever it is that you do to it at some spot You perturb the system That perturbation this is a quantum mechanical fact will start to spread throughout the system Its influence will spread throughout the system like an epidemic You touch one qubit if you know what a qubit is that qubit will touch a few more qubits few more qubits will touch a few more qubits and The effect of perturbing the system will spread There's a notion of size It's like the size of an epidemic the size of an epidemic simply means the number of sick people and the number of sick people Has a tendency to grow Here's an example for the experts on quantum computation if there are anybody know about quantum computers Nobody good. Okay, then this picture doesn't mean much to you. This is a quantum circuit and Proceeds from left to right If you perturb it with a green qubit that perturbation will spread throughout the quantum computer And that's the phenomena of scrambling of information scrambling Now what on earth does this have to do with falling? I'll give you an example. It comes from a setup called ADS CFT that may not mean anything to you. It's fine. It doesn't matter I just realized I have a laser pointer built into here. It's not really a laser pointer Yeah, good. All right. What is this? This is the boundary far away the boundary encoding the hologram The bulk of space the interior is in here Imagine coming and perturbing The hologram perturbing means just hitting it or something that Information that you've done so starts to spread and starts to spread throughout the hologram And there is this notion of the size of the perturbation You can calculate these things and the calculation as I said is purely quantum mechanical Maybe a bit of quantum field theory, but no gravity And what do you find you find that the rate of change of size in this? setup is Exactly equal to the mass of an object which was created at this point Times the gravitational acceleration These quantities here you get from elsewhere, but they're well defined in the context And what does it say? Well, what would gravity say? Gravity would say that the time derivative of the momentum of the particle is falling is equal to mg And so we see these two different fields of physics entirely different coming together and giving rise to an equation I don't know if Galileo would have recognized it in quite this form, but it was Galileo's equation and In order to make sense of it. You have to believe that momentum Of the object which was created is Simply the size of the perturbation Now you may not understand that you may say he's talking gobbledygook and the main thing that I want you to get from this is again this correspondence between gravitational things this unexpected correspondence between gravitational things and Quantum things here's another example Instead of a flat plane being the hologram we can imagine the hologram is a sphere surrounding some place at the center of the Diagram the center of the picture there might be a black hole or planet or other mass If you do the same calculation in this context of calculating how the size of a perturbation grows Again purely quantum mechanically What do you find you find the marvelous formula that the rate of change of the size? The mass times the acceleration of the informing object is just equal to the product of the two masses Newton's constant and the distance between them squared in other words Newton's law of gravity Quantum mechanics the growth of size gravitation gravitational attraction To me That is very stunning correspondence Okay, let's come out the black holes in paradoxes. It was a famous paradox of Stephen Hawking's I'm going to over simplify it not just Stephen Hawking's paradox, but a later paradox called the firewall paradox Please if you're a theoretical physicist don't shoot me for the way I explain this because it's going to be over simplified The black hole paradox.  They're in the Hawking radiation So the encyclopedia gets transferred Or the information of the encyclopedia gets transferred to the To the radiation that's a quantum mechanical principle that That's we've known about for a long time And if you take that radiation Imagine somebody takes that radiation grabs all the photons Put some in a box and squeezes that box down into some small box somewheres Then what this is telling us the quantum mechanics Is that the encyclopedia? Again, I emphasize that by that I mean the bits that comprise the information in the encyclopedia Is transferred from the black hole To the radiation or to the black hole that the radiation might have been compressed into In other words as the black hole shrinks it cannot hold any information And if it can't hold any information nothing can fall into it anymore And one says that there is a firewall at the horizon Firewall doesn't mean in the sense of burning up It means in the sense of an information firewall that no information Can fall into the black hole anymore Every time you try to do so it pops out and appears far away in the radiation That's the idea now this idea of a firewall was very very badly at odds What with what we knew about general relativity? General relativity always said that you can always put things into the black hole and they will simply stay there So This led to a this paradox the so-called firewall paradox Let's say it this way either there is a firewall or Will sometimes call Raphael were you the inventor of a equals rb? I think you might have been Yes, I think he was as a matter of fact The idea is a generalization of the holographic idea that things are not where you think they are And that in fact The encyclopedia which is in fact behind the horizon of the black hole, but its bits its bits of information Are found far away in the Hawking radiation Don't worry about what a and rb stand for what it says is that the information comprising the black the the thing inside the black hole Is far away far away on alpha centuri in some other system In other words, it's an extreme version Of this holographic idea that things are just not where you think they are Well, that seemed too crazy. I think even Raphael for it was too crazy It did seem too crazy but one thing It seemed to suggest That if somebody far away manipulated the radiation in this box It would immediately have an effect on the interior of the black hole And an effect which if somebody jumped into the black hole would detect What was done far away and that seemed totally inconsistent With the idea that close things can affect close things, but they can't affect far things Well, it needed a new idea Resolving this puzzle required a new idea And the new idea is called er equals e pr Einstein er stands Well, let's first do e pr How many people here know the who are e pr stands for? We'll go to a good fraction of you good. It stands of course for einstein padolski and rosin But it also is the phenomena of entanglement quantum entanglement Now i'm not going to tell you exactly what the quantum entanglement is It's what einstein called spooky action at a distance I'm just going to tell you a very very simple version of it Two things they could just be two electrons or they could be two nuclei or they could be two macroscopic objects Are entangled If by measuring one of them you find out certain kinds of quantum information about the other one No matter how far away that other one is Let's just call that entanglement now all my physicist friends know that i'm being oversimplified but there is this phenomena of sharing information Between two different distance systems. That's called e pr entanglement and it's a very mysterious Phenomenon and i'm not going to explain it now. We'll just say it exists that was the year 1935 when einstein padolski and rosin discovered or at least Oh, let's let's make it simple discovered entanglement It was incidentally a very good year for einstein einstein. I think had three really good years 1905 when he discovered especially when he discovered all of modern physics Except for gravity except for the rules of gravity 1915 or so when he completed the general theory of relativity and understood gravity And 1935 which is much less famous In which he discovered this phenomena of entanglement, but the same exact year he discovered something else Called einstein rosin bridges einstein or sometimes called wormholes wormholes are a solution of einstein's equations In which you have two black holes far away from each other with a kind of tunnel of space between them You can't see that tunnel of space. It's in some interior space that can't be seen But the two very distant objects are connected by a I call it a tunnel. I've called it a bridge. I've called it a wormhole all the same idea You've seen these things in science fiction people jumping into wormholes and so forth. I always thought it was nonsense But not completely What's the idea if you could go as fast if What it sounds like is you can jump into one black hole Over here And pop out over here or we'll see that you can't do that But nevertheless, that's what a wormhole resembles The science fiction idea Of a bridge between very distant places Now what does er? That's the bridge einstein rosin bridge Have to do with epr other than they have two letters in common nothing Before 2013 Nobody and i'm absolutely convinced that einstein was above among that nobody had any idea that entanglement And wormholes or einstein rosin bridges had anything to do with each other And after 2013 they had everything to do with each other in fact The idea goes with the acronym er equals epr If we call it p equals one, but nobody does er The idea of a bridge between distant regions of space and the idea of entanglement Are the same idea so i'm going to show you a little bit about how that works The rectangle here is supposed to be space a big region of space Over here on earth We have a bunch of particles Far away on alpha centauri We have another bunch of particles two clouds of particles those particles have never been in contact with each other They don't know about each other. They're completely separate With no prior interaction between them I'm going to take this sheet of space and fold it over Not because it's folded over, but just why I want to draw it that way to make a point But it is still true that this cloud over here is far from this cloud because you have to go around this long way to get there What happens if you let those those clouds of particles collapse? shrink They form black holes That's where a black hole is It's the shrinkage and collapse of a star for example These could form a star eventually and after the star they could form black holes And those black holes will be completely separate from each other with no connection between them On the other hand, let's do something else now Let's take a bunch of entangled electrons or a bunch of entangled particles Half of them are over here and half of them are over here Now how do you create well the the green line here just indicates that this particle is entangled with this one This particle is entangled with this one. No, not that one this one How do you create such a situation? To create it you have to create the entangled particles near each other You can't create entangled particles far from each other You have to bring the particles together You've got to let them interact with each other and they will become entangled But once they're entangled you can take the half of them That's down here Separate it. Well, let's say we take this half of them and bring them all around here So that we wind up with two clouds of them of entangled particles Now we let gravity do its work And when gravity does its work again, it creates two black holes But the black holes are now connected by an einstein rosin bridge In other words entanglement And wormholes are in some sense the same thing Two black holes which are entangled will necessarily have a bridge between them Two black holes which are unentangled will not This is what's called er equals epr And it was a major discovery It seemed ludicrous at first but it very quickly caught on Is now part of the standard Lore What can you do with it? Okay, so let's imagine now that we do have such a wormhole connecting two very distant black holes One of them franklin has control over Control means he can do things to it. He can jump into it if he wants The other one linus has control over and they're very far away One is on now for centurion. The other is on earth, but they have this einstein rosin bridge connecting them Well with enough Care And enough fine tuning They can arrange these black holes so that they can each jump into their own black hole And in a very short period of time can meet at the center and shake hands What they cannot do at least without some Further considerations which I'll come through if I have time. I mean I have time Linus cannot jump into one Pass through and come out the other one That can't happen Now the fact that it can't happen is both known from the quantum mechanical point of view It's called the no signaling theorem for entanglement And for wormholes, it's called the non traversability of wormholes the impossibility of traversing through them And it turns out those are the same phenomena one quantum mechanical the other gravitational Now let's come back to a equals rb The encyclopedia a in black hole number one or left hand black hole here is encoded In the radiation in region two over here Our problem before was that sounded crazy because somebody manipulating the radiation over here Could perturb what's inside the black hole in just such a way that somebody who jumped into this black hole over here would detect That a very very distant observer Had done something to this group of photons over here that sounded outlandish But now we know that if these photons over here are entangled with the black hole, which they will be That an einstein rosin bridge and from outside you can't see that einstein rosin bridge But the einstein rosin bridge will open up And so anything anybody does over here Will affect what's behind the horizon Of the original black hole in other words a equals rb makes perfect sense Again, it has to do with this basic idea that information is not the way you think it is This is a radical example of it. What about the wormhole side of it? How can it be why should it be That somebody who goes into one black hole and offers some tury can't get through the wormhole and come out Well one worm one end of the wormhole is in new york the other end is in california Think of it as a tunnel between the two places Why can't you drive through that tunnel? And the reason is that einstein rosin bridges and this is a gravitational phenomena Tend to stretch and expand with time That's the solution of einstein's equations gravitational equations wormholes grow so If who was a franklin i can't remember franklin or linus linus tries to drive into the new york side He will encounter the fact that the wormhole is growing And in fact it will grow so fast That he cannot outrun the growth of the wormhole and will simply never get through to the other side and come out the other side That's the non-perversibility of wormholes. You can't even send the light signal through Because even a light signal will not go fast enough to outrun the growth of the wormhole What that's the that's the gravitational side of it. Is there a quantum side of it? Yes, there is and I don't have time to tell you What it is. I will tell you what it is. I don't have time to explain it But I'll tell you that it's a computer science concept It's called the growth of complexity the black hole Quantum state of the system is becoming more and more complex It's very much like this information scrambling that we talked about having to do with falling The quantum state of the wormhole Evolves it becomes more and more complex And that complexity translates into the growth of the wormhole So these are all these very very remarkable correspondences Which tend to make us think that they're Not just that there are deep connections between quantum mechanics and gravity But it's at some level as I said I'll say it again. There are two sides of the same coin Okay, so We have the idea Of a quantum hologram encoding information, which could be far from where the object that it's encoding is And what is the other side of the coin? The other side of the coin is gravity I like this picture. It's my favorite one of all looks What happened here? Oh my There's a totally different subject. Let's see if we can get it back Oppenheimer lecture All right, now let me address. Let's see. How much time do I have Raphael? Am I running out of time? 15 seconds Oh 15 minutes. I don't need 15 minutes. We have lots of time for questions. Okay There are criticisms Oh incidentally, one might point out that most of these ideas Grew not just out of a combination of quantum mechanics and gravity But string theory how string theory got into it. I haven't really said very much about But let me tell you that all of the precise examples all the mathematically precise examples of this correspondence tend to come from systems Which were invented or discovered in string theory A string theory quantum gravity has been the victim of an enormous amount of criticism the criticism Which are first of all things unjustified but What does it have to do with the criticism? I would say Stems from the fact and I think it is a fact that good science Almost always spreads its influence far and wide into many fields of not just physics But even outside of physics and in particular Into engineering into technology and that's a pattern that we've seen over and over and over again Special relativity led to nuclear energy General relativity we use it for navigation by satellite. Believe it or not quantum mechanics the list of technological advantage advances And quantum mechanics was not invented by people trying to do technology It was invented by people who are curious about the atom Quantum mechanics among other things it led to the MRI machine But so many things that I have that the list would go on and on quantum electrodynamics trying to understand the quantum mechanics of electrons and photons in particular photons led to the laser Or at least is closely connected with the laser and so forth and so on What about quantum gravity General relativity and its connection to quantum mechanics. It seems so infinitely remote with no connections or applications to the rest of science It could be that that's true. It could be we're just stuck with that But that has not been what is happening first of all This connections between quantum mechanics and gravity have led to new insights into strictly Phenomena which seemed to have nothing to do with gravitation for example The surface of a black hole the horizon of a black hole Behaves as if it were made of a fluid That's something that general relativists general relativists discovered a long time But not just a fluid but a quantum fluid Whatever that means One can use the fact By knowing enough about black hole physics and knowing enough about general relativity You can compute properties of fluids that were too hard to compute otherwise Here's one example Of something that was inspired by the connection between fluid mechanics black holes and quantum mechanics It's a bound on the viscosity of fluids Now that doesn't seem to have anything to do with either of those subjects Well, it's a little bit quantum mechanical. It is quantum mechanical Ada is the fluid is a viscosity of a fluid the stickiness of it S on the right hand side is the entropy per unit volume of the fluid the heat per unit volume What was discovered in the context Not discovered by people doing fluid dynamics people comparing properties of black quantum mechanical black hole horizons with fluids Is that the viscosity is always greater than equal to some number that includes h bar that includes the quantum constant Times the entropy density Will that have impact in the fluid dynamics and into uh probably There are things called strange metals Strange metals are a form of matter that was discovered by condensed metaphysicists Are they important in technology? I don't really know but they were discovered about 30 years ago And they were met metallic systems which behaved just differently than ordinary metals It's turning out that those strange metals Are mathematically identical The certain special kinds of black holes called extremo black holes or near extremo black holes Both sides are quantum mechanical One side is also gravitational extremo black holes The other side is the pure quantum mechanics of certain materials Information scrambling the thing which I told you accounts for the falling of the apple as it accelerates in the gravitational field Information scrambling is an important thing in quantum computer science The information scrambling from black holes Led to a bound again another bound that a certain constant called the up and down exponent In information scrambling is always less than some other constant That now is considered a reliable fundamental bound on how fast information can spread through a quantum mechanical system I told you that Linus cannot get through the wormhole Well, I was a little bit too pessimistic With a little bit of help from something called classical The exchange of classical information These little purple dots being sent from one side to the other That's just ordinary Morse code for example, but has no information about about Linus or about anything else inside the wormhole with a little bit of help from a little bit of classical information You can slow down that growth of the wormhole You can slow it down enough so that indeed Linus can get through it That phenomenon Which was discovered in the context of gravity and quantum gravity Has led to a new protocol And new experiments For quantum teleportation quantum teleportation is a real thing You can teleport information what it means and you can't exceed the speed of light But you can send information in a way that is completely hidden 100 hidden cannot be decoded by an eavesdropper And so it's led to new protocols for quantum teleportation Experiments are now being done to confirm that this can happen not in black holes, but in quantum computers I'm not allowed to tell you that the experiments are successful because I promise not to Mention that they're being done and that they're working out successfully So I won't quantum complexity theory the growth of wormholes The whole idea of gravitation being controlled by the growth of complexity has led to many new insights Into how complexity of quantum systems evolve We've seen advances coming from gravity In error correction error correction is the big hang up in trying to build a quantum computer It's too easy to make errors in a quantum computer You have to error correct for them and a whole new insight Into error correction has come from thinking about gravitational systems again and finally In the hands of one of my favorite physicists one of the senior Uh Much of what we're talking about has had a very interesting influence in cosmology in inflationary cosmology So far from being a totally isolated thing Outside the framework of any other science This quantum gravity is beginning to have An effect which let's just put it this way Condensed metaphysicists and quantum computer physicists and Theoretical cosmologists are being forced to learn what adscft means And they are learning it they're learning it and using it So this is exciting. This is a very very exciting period in the development of physics It is also one which is very very difficult to explain to a general audience You know when you give a lecture like this or what did Lincoln say you can please half of the people half of the Time well, you can please half of the audience Half of the time and so forth and so on. I think the real truth is an lecture like this You can you you're lucky if you can If you can satisfy any piece of the audience even a little bit Because the ideas are complicated. They're difficult and so forth You do your best You do your best to try to explain And I've tried to explain as well as I can. I hope you have gotten something out of it I hope there's at least one person who has gotten something out of this lecture And I thank you for listening Okay, we have some time for a few questions From the audience. I also have some from zoom Would anyone like to take a question ask a question? Well, I got a couple on zoom so I Okay, I'll I'll speak up Okay, how are you there's an experiment going on on using drones to detect using drones To detect quantum waves Drones drones There's the stuff flying around in ukraine Drones drones. Yes. Drones. Yes And they're used they're they're you're planning on there's experiments going on and using these to detect quantum waves How are they? Okay, I guess they it's an interesting No idea. I'm I'm interested in the drone. So, okay. That's that's I'm sorry Well, I never heard of maybe Okay, we have a question Hi, hello, just out of curiosity.  Can I draw the The cartoons did you draw those cartoons the peanuts cartoons? Did you draw them yourself? Oh, yeah Yeah Some of them some of them I just copy But they were all hand drawn by me. Yes. Yes My first um, my first uh ambition Had been to be a painter Not a house painter a picture painter The problem was I had no talent whatever or at least my talent was Maybe being able to draw charles schultz cartoons, but I really wanted to be Picasso Didn't work out I have a couple of questions for online Um, how can a wormhole grow faster than the speed of light? Well Locally each piece of it is growing The rule is not that one thing can't exceed the speed of light. It's one thing cannot pass another Close by a faster than the speed of light The universe for example in some sense grows faster than the speed of light Uh the accelerated expansion of the universe tells you that if you're far enough away Just the just the Hubble law That things will be moving away from you faster than the speed of light But it does tell you that you can't get information from from behind from that far away And that's what creates a horizon. It creates a cosmic horizon The same is true here the wormhole can grow But if it's growing that fast you simply you can't get through it for one thing and you can't receive signals From far away along the wormhole Unless this idea of classical information being sent back and forth can come and slow the The growth of the wormhole and that is something that That there's mathematics for it And in some way it's being tested in the laboratory not in real wormholes, but in entangled quantum computers Thanks for the talk So if the information in everything is really all scrambled up and delocalized, why does it act in any way that makes sense to us? Like why do things like why is physics local? To us that that is a really good question Now if you just take some random quantum system It will have some features that look somewhat gravitational in character But it will not have the degree of locality That we expect in the real world. It's only very very special quantum systems Very very special candidates for the holographic screen, let's say Which show the kind of locality which you're asking about Those special quantum systems Are generally gauge theories whatever if you don't know what that means. That's okay And they're also very very strongly coupled very difficult systems to analyze So you're pointing at one of the most important questions To understand what the nature of the very very special systems that behave with this kind of ultra locality that the real world seems to have And that's that's as far as I can go with it because I think the answers are yet to be given First of all fantastic lecture. It was great, but I'm not going to admit I'm not going to state that I understood. No, no, of course But one of the the a person who happens to have worked on strange metals and thought a little bit about quantum computing How much of the connections between The quantum gravity and everything you've been saying and and these other fields What some of us work on is because of the mathematics discovered in the process of Of working out theories string theory and working out theories and how much is some deeper connection between the phenomena Okay, I think the connections are deeper. Certainly. Certainly. That's part of it. Just the mathematics seems entirely similar You'll probably know about the such devd a kataya theory. That's an example Yeah, they're the but a lot of the physical phenomena Experienced in that system are identical to the physical phenomena that you would expect in a near extremal black hole So I'm hesitant to say that it's just the mathematics. I don't think that I think there is a real physical similarity If that's what you're asking I think there is yeah, we'd have to sit down and talk about that obviously but I have another question from online if I if I may yeah, so Can you say a few more words about the growth of quantum complexity and how it corresponds to the non-traversibility of words you wouldn't believe it and I have But I'm not sure this is the venue for it Quantum complexity. Well, I'll tell you what quantum complexity is first of all, let me tell you what complexity is complexity means lots of different things to different people you might think for example a Beautifully designed building or something or a beautifully designed car is complex No, it's less complex than almost anything you can think about In that sense complexity is used in other words. I have a very complex relation with my mother-in-law Unfortunately, I had well fortunately had a very good relation with my mother-in-law, but you could use the term that way In fact, a very special thing is meant complexity if you have a given problem complexity is a measure Of the shortest number of steps to solve that problem.  It took you a certain number of steps That number of steps might not be the cheapest and least number of steps that it takes you to prove the theorem What am I mean by steps? Steps are the use of the of the logical Axioms together with the rules of logic each one being used once is a step Your proof might involve 550 steps The complexity of a theorem is a measure of the least possible number of steps that it would have taken to prove the theorem Another example from quantum mechanics A quantum computation is you have a quantum computer and you're going to put into it some simple state And you want to run that computer and get To another state another state which may have some interesting information in it Okay, quantum state of a bunch of qubits or something like that You can think of different ways of getting there. There are different routes different routes different series of gates different series of processes That could bring you to that To that target state the complexity of the state Is a measure of the fewest number of simple operations that can get you there That's the notion of complexity Now that's exactly the notion that's used in this wormhole situation The wormhole grows which is simply another way of well, which means that the quantum state of the of the Two black holes evolves with time It's a general feature that complexity increases with time in other words You go to states which are harder and harder to get to which would take a few more and more steps to get to them And curiously interestingly There appears to be a connection between how complex The quantum state of the black holes is and how big the wormhole is That seems to be something that's fairly well confirmed by now and so It is believed that the growth of the interior of the wormhole is equivalent That's a gravitational side. That's the general relativity side Equal to the tendency for quantum complexity to increase with time for a complex for For a chaotic quantum system. So I'll have to leave it at that because As I said, I could say a lot more but it would take more time than we can expand that was great Hello, uh, so I was wondering since you said that the Center of a black hole or at least the holographic surface of the center of a black hole acts like a fluid Would that would solving the horizon which is a kind of holographic surface? Yes, okay So if it acts like a fluid would solving uh, the navier stokes equation Be a step forward to figuring out what happens at the center of black hole I rather think frankly, I think will happen the other way Uh, that people will be able to solve the gravitational equations for this fluid and Make steps that Direct attack on the navier stokes equations would be too hard for So my guess is it will happen the other way that not solving a navier stokes equation won't teach you that much about black holes Because I think it's just too hard to do But solving black hole equations, which are a lot easier because they're just Einstein's equations Might very well teach us a lot about our Dynamics of fluids that would be my best guess as to which way the information will flow there But there are other experts on that subject here and I think You're an expert, right? Yeah, yeah, he has an ori Oh, I don't know who somebody's in there Oh, I have a question. Oh here. I don't know if he knows Anyways, I was wondering if there is a relationship between the surface and the entropy between the what?  Black holes and horizons have entropy. They have a uniform entropy distributed over the horizon They also have viscosity so it was realized by I think it was a condensed matter physicist son s o n That that no matter what he tried to do to the black hole He could never get the viscosity of the surface fluid To be less than a certain amount Which was proportional to the entropy And uh, that was a pure black hole study And it turned out that when people looked at experiments on the most on the least viscous fluids No matter how they manipulated the fluids experimentally Nobody found the fluid who is that That exceeded them the the bound the sun and starinets who discovered this bound I just took that as an example There's nothing particularly special. There are lots and lots of examples like this This one was easy to explain. There's a nice simple equation that goes with it and And It's so down to earth That it's very easy to understand not understand where it comes from why it's true, but what it says um, sir Okay, I have two questions. Um, the first one is um, I'm not very familiar with this quantum gravity before this lecture and there's one thing that seems very well to me is that um Where is the quantum holograph and does it physically exist? And this is you're asking where the quantum I think the answer is that you take any region Any region whatever this region here of space and you want to The room and you want to ask How the information is encoded And the answer is that the amount of information you need to describe the interior of this room is never more Than the surface area of the boundary of the room And so you can always say you pick your region And then the answer will be on the boundary of that region So it's a mathematical statement Uh, what about the universe? Well, the universe does have a horizon Uh, the natural place for the hologram describing the entire universe would be at the horizon of the uh At the cosmic horizon of the universe But that's something that is still being studied So the natural the natural thing to say is we take the whole entire observable universe It's bounded by something called the cosmic horizon And that would be the natural place where you might want to say the hologram was Now i'm not sure that all my colleagues agree with that and that's still still something that I think is um work in progress Okay, and the second one is uh, really quick and is related to a former question How do you define on two points are nearby as we discuss that you cannot travel Greater than at a speed greater than the speed of light between two nearby points and to what extent Does these two points can be uh can be considered as nearby As you stated send messages back and forth in small amount of time you'll say they nearby I'm not sure what else to say I don't know rafael when they said two points on nearby Hi, thank you for the lecture. Um Here uh, so the famous quote-unquote historical dilemma Is that the copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is Not irreversible is not reversible while The schrodinger equation is very much time symmetric Do you believe that these Deeper insights into the workings of quantum mechanics and as they relate to general relativity as you laid out in the lecture We'll deepen our understanding of our interpretation of the wave function Or even perhaps change or offer a new interpretation of the wave function I'm only going to say that that's a wonderful question. I think that is A really really good question is all of I've always felt That the puzzles of quantum mechanics the many worlds interpretation all the very very confusing things About quantum mechanics Would only eventually get solved when we understand the connection with gravity. I still think that But I don't if I knew how to do it How to make those connections I would have published them the no no, I mean My feeling is that the answer to your question is understanding these aspects of quantum gravity will Tell you more about the inner workings of quantum mechanics, but nobody has really um actually that that's not been A primary concern of the people doing this kind of work They tend to be a very focused Pragmatic people if you can call a theoretical physicist pragmatic Who will tend to solve problems? That can be solved This is part of the art of being a good theoretical physicist is to identify those problems Which are hard enough that the results of them of a solution will matter and be important But we're not so hard that we'll just sit around for a hundred years scratching our butts over them and so The general feeling of my friends and so forth and I sort of share it Is that these problems of the foundations of quantum mechanics are real problems But boy, they've been around a long time people have struggled with them people not been able to make any real sense out of it That's not even clear. They're real. You know what for Feynman said about it. He said the problems are so Confusing that he can't even tell if there's a real problem And that is the way it feels you know, it's like thinking about consciousness or or so The pragmatic side of physicists tends to make them steer away from problems like that Will they come back to it? and perhaps But at the present time, I think all of this has not impacted the um The most fundamental understanding of quantum mechanics, which is disappointing in a way Okay, we have time for two more questions. I think one at the front Yes, I also have a question about We talked before about collapsing a set of entangled particles into a wormhole at One here and one at Alpha Centauri And I wanted to ask if that in turn also means that if we have a wormhole and the decays That we also get back a set of entangled particles I'm still having a little trouble hearing. Can anybody repeat it? Some voices it's nothing special some voices. I simply have difficulty. There's a certain range of frequencies Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, for example, you have these two entangled black holes which form the wormhole Um, what happens if those two black holes evaporate? They each just get transformed into radiation particles that go out, but those particles will be entangled So that's exactly right Yeah, last question because I'm beginning to fade Try now Okay, I'll say that again. I'm I'll ask a much simpler question than I was I was planning to um You mentioned that there's a definition of the Leoponov exponent that has to do with quantum gravity I was just wondering if you could say more about What system that exponent is referring to and where that definition comes from? uh Well, it's a wide variety of systems, but any system The the most well understood case I would say is this syk model, which is also a theory of strange metals um The Leoponov exponent has to do with exponential growth When anything grows exponentially It it varies like e to some constant times time that constant in this context is called the Leoponov exponent Um, what is it that's growing? Well, the simplest way to say it is it's the growth of the region of influence of perturbation In other words, there's growth of what I called size earlier Um, what did you ask me again? I forgot What system is it referring to any kind pretty much any kind of quantum chaotic system But as I said, the best understood one at this point is this um syk theory of strange metals, which is also a theory of extreme or near-extremal black holes syk that's the initials such dev yeah and katayev So if you that's where most of it has been worked out in the greatest detail Well, Lenny, I think the only way that people would be left unsatisfied is only in so far as they're hungry for more Yeah, so Thanks again, professor Sussman


Hey everybody. Happy Monday to you. Spoiler alert. There is no night king here. Just Greg Sussman joined by JJ Zacharias in from Fandall. What's going on, JJ? Not too much, man. I'm glad the NFL draft is over. It's officially the start of the fantasy football season. Absolutely. People are starting to draft their best balls. They're taking a look at some of the wind totals for these teams. And what JJ and I are going to do today are we're going to look at some of the players that were drafted and let you know, hey, here's who you should target in season long and here's who you should probably stay away from. So let's start at the top with the good stuff, the players that you want to target. And we'll begin with Josh Jacobs of the Oakland Raiders. Everybody knew that the Raiders wanted Jacobs and they got their man anyway. Seemingly the only players standing this way are guys that have been there for a few years now and the Crow Show. Why do you think Josh Jacobs is worth an early round selection?  The only guy that's really in his way from an early on perspective is Crowell and from passing down standpoint is Jaylin Rashard, who's a good pass catcher, but you don't spend this type of draft equity on a running back to watch him sit on the bench. Unless you're the Seattle Seahawks with Rashad Penny, of course, I think that you can make the argument pretty easily. This is the best landing spot for running back in this draft. So we should see work right away just given that draft capital. He has past catching ability. You know, I didn't love him that much coming out just because of the fact that he didn't have a ton of production in college. But draft equity sort of trumps that when it comes to the running back position.  He could see 50 plus targets in that backfield and altogether that really makes him a mid range to low end RB two and fantasy drafts here in 2019. Jacobs, somebody that doesn't have a lot of miles on those legs. And of course, that was a bad thing to hear something coming into the draft, even though everyone hates when they have too many miles on the tread. So there's no winning. But Josh Jacobs, you draft him, that is a win.


O'Brien folks this is Tom O'Brien of TFNN we have five days a week we go seven hours a day we go 24 hours a day in the internet at TFNN.com always remember folks whatever you think about you bring about whatever your focus on grows hope everyone's having a great day safe day it's a TGIF folks make it a great one to master love you have to practice love the out of relationship is the whole mastery the only way to reach masteries with practice to master relationship is therefore about action is not about attaining knowledge let's take a look at it out here we have the now industries down 20 and Aztec off two S&Ps off two gold contract down $28.40 trade at $19.90 an ounce we have silver down 29 cents $25.30 an ounce late sweet crude up 37 cents $77.74 cents a barrel notes and bonds ten-year note down five ticks trade in 114 15 the 30 year off 13 at 129 29 and $king dollar $king dollar down nine ticks trade in 101 831 the euros at 109 the yen is that 124 and the British pound is that one British pound is that 120 yen's at 134 the British pound is that 124 to $1 us dollar off on numbers eight seven seven nine two seven six six four eight give us a call folks want to know what's going on in your world world S&Ps let's take a look at them what do you have well bottom line is that we have a high volume intraday low folks that I expect we're gonna go after coming into this close so you take a look at this we've had a really cool trading range out here today means 20 points up and down left and right but we're hanging out here and spades okay you can see that bar that buys a high volume low at there 41 30 35 and what you have right here let me pull this out of the way if you watch and target TV see the expansion of volume already what time is it so that's that's that's nine nine minutes into this bar but you can see the expansion of volume already the expansion there on this bar up 29,000 contracts versus making a high out here at 17,000 okay so we take the top of that bar let me see the top of that bar okay so this is cool this is interesting let me do this this is who's going to Turkey so see the top of this bar is 20 no 41 49 and we just got down to 41 47 and it did reject it it will see where the shakes out I might take is that we're gonna go out of the bottom of the bar but you know you hear me talk about this plenty of times that but when you're looking at the bars you always you always have to be cognizant of top of the bars to there's no doubt about it you know we'll see where this ends up going my take is we're gonna go to the bottom this because of the fact of the matter is that's the range the range that we've been in all day you know when a pop topside you can see what ended up happening you've got the volume died in the vine go go contract out here we're gonna be doing over 200,000 contracts and this is all about the U.S. dollar line away you take a look at the gold contract gold contract coming down that's 200,000 contracts right now and if we just bring this back a little and you know your point 3 a 2 is what's 1974 your 5 low is 1946 those those are your targets that's the bottom line and it's all about here I mean that the dollar is running the whole game out here which is pretty cool because it makes when you have correlations folks it's a much easier enough correlation now it looks like the dollar hasn't done anything and what's intriguing about this that it hasn't moved that much but you would you want to take into consideration if you only get the small movement like this and the S&P can go up and down 20 points guess what if we get the movement that I think we're gonna get you're gonna have a lower markets you know I suspect I expect lower markets coming into close today but I'm talking about next week really lower markets and you can see we got a huge expansion up here this morning and that expects when the dollar went from a price point of the 101 all the way up to 10219 and then if you take a look at that that's when the flip this around that's when the S&P that's the S&P that's where the S&P has this high volume low and what's happening right now is that the dollar is getting juice coming into the close you know so we'll see where the shakes out and of course there is this that's when the S&P went from the 41 58 down into the 41 35 and then 20 minutes not 10 minutes to 10 minutes to 10 minute positive you know so I expect we're gonna be down into those levels we go inside the MDX 100 we take a look at the strength versus the weakness inside the MDX Amazon's up 3% you got CSX the train company up 2.9% Gilead's up 2 Crowdstrike is up 1 taking away from it Airbnb's down 3 you get the zoom communications off 2.8 Walgreens boots no no Warner Brothers is down 2 and JD.com is off 2% inside the Dow Industries the strength versus the weakness inside the Dow Industries point wise out here we have Procter and Gamble putting 34 positive points in Goldman 16 Home Depot 10 taking away from it United Health minus 30 Boeing minus 19 Caterpillar minus 18 we go over to Procter and Gamble and they come out with their numbers now so intriguing man there's no doubt you know they come out they come out with decent numbers man because they went up on their product line and buy a lot of their products man I mean they went up in their product line by 10% you know that's how they made their money because what happened the volumes went down and was hitting you know companies like this is that you know we going to all these stores you know like we're going to Publix I shop Publix all the time and what has happened in the you know the aisles of Publix it's turned into all Publix products I mean it started out years ago you know they would you know follow they take products that they were selling a lot of and then they start branching them themselves and I'm sure for and in the context of the consumers meaning of the manufacturers that is a big challenge man do you know what I mean you know but in Procter and Gamble's case they went from having a hundred and sixty five products down to sixty five and they got rid of everything that was lagging and needless to say you know they're concentrated on everything that they not only make a lot of money sell and you know bottom line they took in 20 billion 90 days they brought a dollar 37 to the bottom line and on top of that they're still growing which is a mind-blowing the United States they're still growing like 2.75% a year internationally they're growing only by 1% now that being said you can see these numbers on the third of the they're growing let's see what is the biggest one fabric and home care and then health care that's the big numbers our phone numbers<PHONE_NUMBER> we have the Dow the Dow industry was right now trading down 25 now it's like it's off five this and he's off three and a half stay right there folks to come right back


Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE. Covering Splunk.conf 19, brought to you by Splunk. Okay, welcome back everyone. It's theCUBE's live coverage in Las Vegas for Splunks.conf. This is their annual conference, the 10 year anniversaries theCUBE's coverage for seven years. We've been covering this company from startup to IPO to growth to now going to the next level as a leader in security. And our next guest is Scott Ward, Principal Solutions Architect for AWS.  I'm sure you're super busy Scott, but you're here at Splunk.conf. Actually they're a big partner of AWS. Yeah, yeah, definitely. I mean Splunk's a great partner. We've had a strong relationship with Splunk for quite a long time. Both sides of the house, AWS and Splunker are leaning in to help kind of add value to our mutual customers. And I'd say even building on that, Splunk's been a long time customer. And so you guys obviously really focus on cloud security. You had your inaugural reinforce event in Boston this year of which we broadcasted live videos around YouTube. YouTube.com still has an angle for anyone interested. But this was really kind of a watershed moment because it wasn't your classic security show, it was a cloud security. Yeah, it was definitely, it was very much focused on just kind of focusing in and in some ways it actually allowed people who don't normally get to come to an AWS event or focus on security and really dive deeper into security. I mean, security AWS is our top priority and we want to make sure that our customers are really understanding and being able to execute on that and be able to feel confident in what they're doing or running on AWS. And Splunk has become a very successful and some people call them the number one third party vendor in security for workload apps. I'll see log files. You bought SignalFX for tracing microservices around the corner, a lot of good things there. But as the cloud equation starts to come in where the operations need to have security end to end on-premises, edge, cloud, the role of Amazon and your partners are super important. You talk about that relationship and how that's evolving. Yeah, I mean, I think when you talk about our partners it's definitely very important. We have, AWS has lots of different services on its platform that we allow customers to use, but those partners come in and help fill out the gaps where customers need somebody to be able to provide more or extra, especially when we look at security. So that shared responsibility model we have, where the top half is the customer's responsibility. They have a lot of flexibility in what they can do and that means that they can bring in the partners they want and help them to be able to accomplish the things that they want to do. Tell me about the Security Hub, the Amazon's AWS Security Hub, what's that about? Sure, so Security Hub is a service that we actually launched at, reinforced at when generally available then. And it's focused on really giving customers visibility into high severity security alerts and their compliance status. While they're running across all their AWS accounts, it allows them to aggregate, prioritize, and sort all of this data coming from multiple data sources. And when we talk about those multiple data sources it really is a couple of different areas, Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, and Amazon Macy, but also third-party products. So if a customer is using third-party security products they can feed into Security Hub to kind of give them that visibility. And then it's also running continuous compliance checks against the customer's AWS accounts to kind of let them know where they stand, when it comes to compliance and where they need to go and correct things with the account or the resource level. So really, you know, enabling customers to kind of get a lot more visibility into what's going on with their AWS environments. And we've been covering this in reporting on the story, but Amazon, and cloud providers in general, Amazon, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, customers are relying more and more on you guys for security, but you have a relationship with Splunk, say a third party. How do they fit in? How does Splunk fit into that Security Hub model? What's the, how's that going? Because just clarify that relationship between, say, Splunk and the Security Hub. Yeah, yeah, so when you talk about Splunk and Security Hub there's actually a couple of different angles there. One is the Splunk Enterprise product. It is a consumer of all the data that is in a customer's Security Hub environment. So you can feed all that data into the Enterprise product and then be able to kind of ask the questions and take all the data that Security Hub provided as well as all the other data that's in Splunk and really be able to get some deep insights into what's going on in your environment. And then on top of that is the Splunk Phantom integration which I'm really, really excited about because Splunk is with Phantom is allowing customers to actually take action on their security data. So customers have often told us, like, it's great, you're making all this data available to me and I can see it, but what do I actually do with it? How am I going to do something with it? And so we advocate a lot for customers to be able to automate what they're doing when it comes to their security findings and get the humans out of the way as much as possible so they can really be adding a lot of value. So Security Hub feeds us to Phantom and Phantom can run playbooks that will do as much or as little on that security finding data to kind of integrate that finding into the customer's operational workflows and collect the right information or hopefully ultimately remediate that security finding so that the customer can get some sleep and they can focus on other things that are more important. Talk about Phantom for a minute just to kind of change gears really, you mentioned that. I talked to Oliver, I've interviewed him at Reinforce and here recently, he's part of that team, Spunk bought the company. What is, why is Phantom so popular? I think Phantom is popular because a couple of things. One, it is allowing customers to resolve and remediate and address an issue with what works for them in a workflow that works for them. It's not making them to clearly fall into a particular box, they can add or remove pieces. The fact that it's very Python based, it's Python's huge in the security community so that they can probably find resources that can actually orchestrate and build these playbooks. And then once they build playbooks they can reuse those pieces to address other issues or things that are coming up. So I think it allows them to really kind of at scale be able to kind of be able to accomplish these things when it comes to automation and addressing with security alerts as they continue to grow. So it makes things go faster, frees up people's time for productivity. I totally feel that that's one of the main reasons that people are looking at this. So if someone's using Splunk, for instance, say I'm a Splunk customer, I'm like, okay, Security Hub, why should I use both? What's, just clarify that piece. I think there's a couple of reasons where I would say that somebody would want to use both. One is Security Hub is the continuous compliance checks. So today's Security Hub offers checks based on the Center for Internet Security AWS benchmark. So we are continuously running those checks. There's about, I think 43 rules that we are running each of those checks against your AWS accounts or the resources in those accounts to tell you where you are or not in compliance. So you get an overall score. You can dig into what's where you need to do further there. Security Hub, I can look at it as a central integration spot to get stuff into Splunk as well. So you can have the GuardDuty, Macy Inspector and third party stuff coming into Security Hub. And then you have that one-stop shop to get all that data into Splunk Enterprise or Phantom. And then the third thing is the fact that Security Hub gives you that security view across multiple AWS accounts. You can designate a master account, invite all your other organizational accounts to share those findings. And your security team can go into Security Hub and have one view of your overall security landscape and be able to look at that at a one single pane of glass but across all of your organizations. So I think those are some key value points I would say that in addition to Splunk that a customer might use Security Hub. So Scott's been great insight on thanks for clarifying the Splunk AWS relationship.  Thanks for the free consulting. We'll do it live on theCUBE. So I'm a Splunk customer, get log files. I see they got some tracing stuff. I'm going cloud native, going to the cloud. We're implementing Amazon. I'm a buyer, I'm a customer of Splunk and they got a lot of this new stuff. Anthem's awesome, SOAR Enterprise 6.0 is out. How do I, what do I do? Why do I architect my Splunk to give me more headroom and grow my Splunk capabilities at the same time take advantage of all the AWS goodness? How would you lay that out? I would say, I would say, you know, let your Splunk be kind of, you know what? You bought Splunk for a particular reason. It's there to answer questions. It's there to take data in. It's a lie to kind of move forward. I would definitely, you know, architect your Splunk to be able to consume as much of the data as possible. AWS has lots of different integrations. To consume that, you shouldn't move away from that. So I would definitely use that. I would use Security Hub for kind of getting that centralization spot for everything related to your AWS environment that can then be your central spot into Splunk. You may have people that it's really not necessary for them to be into Splunk. They don't know Splunk. Security Hub might be a good spot for them to actually do some investigations and learn things as well so that they can do their job. And then you really kind of use the deep technology and query capability of Splunk to kind of do those deeper dives and really understanding what's going on in your environment. So I think, you know, as a buyer, I think you can use both and I think there's room for you to kind of take advantage of both and get the best of both worlds. Yeah, it's really exciting with security going on. It's kind of crazy at the same time because you have cloud scale. You guys have been led the market there and continue to be the leaders in cloud, cloud scale, DevOps, everything else. And the role, volume of data has increased so much. You guys just had your inaugural conference reinforce. And I want to get your thoughts on this as a solution architect and someone who's in the field. Difference between traditional security, chasing the bad guys, defending, intrusion detection, all that good stuff, to cloud security because you have all the security shows out there, RSA, Black Hat, DEF CON. But cloud security introduces a new element around how to architect solutions. What should people know about the impact of cloud security as they start thinking holistically around their enterprise? Right, I think the important thing is, you know, the things you mentioned, the vulnerability scanning, the intrusion detection, because they're all still important in the cloud. I think the key thing that the cloud offers is the fact that you have the ability to now automate and integrate your security teams more tightly with the things that you're doing and you can actually, we always talk about the move fast and stay secure. Customers choose AWS for the self service, the elasticity of the price. And you can't take advantage of those unless your security can actually keep up with you. So the fact that everything is based on an API, you can define infrastructure as code. You can actually enforce standards now, whether it be before you write a line of code in your DevOps pipeline, we're actually being able to detect and react to those things all through code and in a consistent way, really allows you to be able to look at your security in a different way and take the kind of philosophy and minds that you've always had around security, but actually able to do something with it and be able to maybe do the things you've always wanted to do, but have never had a chance to do. So I think the security can actually keep up with you and actually help you differentiate your business even more than maybe it did in the past. So new capabilities are available now with new options. Yep, exactly. Great stuff. Conversations here at .conf in Vegas, Splunk's conference, obviously their user conference, so you guys have re-invent coming up. Cube will be there first week of December. And you got a music festival too, Intersect, which is going to be fun. I'm going to attend that if I don't fall over and die from all these cubenermies. What are you talking about here? What are the key conversations you're having here? Sure. And here at Splunk.conf, at your booth, two customers, what's the main talking point? Sure, I think the main talking point is, and I'm actually presenting in the breakout theater this afternoon, is we're talking about that taking action portion of data's in Security Hub or data's in AWS. How do you do something with that? And what do we enable? And how does a partner like Splunk come in? And what does that taking action actually look like to allow you to be able to do things at scale and be able to leverage and take advantage of your precious resources and use them in the best way possible? So I think that that's a lot of the conversation that we're having and the things that we're focusing on. What do you hope did walk away and action items going to be for people leaving that session? I think people should walk away and understand that it is within their reach to be able to actually be able to kind of have this nirvana of being able to react to security events and not have to have a human engage in every single thing. It is a crawl, walk, run type approach. You're going to need to figure out how do I, when I see this, what are the things I want to do? How do I automate that? Validate that that's actually true and then implement it and then go back and do the next thing. And I'd really like customers to walk away and know that that is possible and that with a little bit of investment they can make it happen and that at a certain point, it will really add benefits to them. Well, AWS has been following you guys for eight years with theCUBE. This will be our ninth year, I think, for re-invent. It's been fun to watch Amazon grow and I'm sure there'll be thousands of new announcements every year that's always blown away with the volume of new stuff. Give a plug for a second on the Amazon partner network which you're part of. And the scope of relationships with third party partners. How important it is and what are some of the cool things going on? Sure, so I mean, the Amazon partner network we're focused on partnering with, it's really that sell with motion where we're going out and AWS is selling, the partner is selling. We work with technology providers and solution systems integrators. And we're really focused on just working with them to make sure that the best solution possible is being created for customers so that they can take advantage of the partner solution and the AWS cloud and that they're getting some sort of a unique value that they're going to get by using the cloud and that partner solution together to help them whether it be security or any other sort of area that they can feel more confident and they can be more successful in the crowd through the combination of both AWS and the partner. And there's a whole team. It's not like a few guys. It's a whole organization committed to Amazon partners. Yes, yes. I mean, I'm one of many solution architects on the partner team. We have partner managers. We have marketing. We have the whole gamut of people that are working globally with our partners to help them really kind of have a great success and a great story to tell about. So all those people throwing foot out there. Amazon doesn't work with partners. Not true. We have tens of thousands of partners and that's my job. I'm working with partners on a daily basis. I'm at events like this. I'm on phone calls. I'm providing guidance. It is very much a core thing that we are focusing on. Partner network, you guys got Marketplace, Amazon's are really putting their resources behind the mission of helping customers with partners. Yes, definitely. And we do that in a lot of different ways. We have the partners that can go through tiers. We have competencies that we actually allow partners to get into so customers can really go find who's the best or who should I be looking at first when I have this particular problem to solve? We've got a security competency and many other competencies. I'm really working to help our customers understand who are these partners and how can they help them with the cloud? Well, we've been following Cherry Wise's career. He's done an amazing job. I know he's handed the reins over to new management. He's going to chill for a while. Congratulations on all your success. Thank you very much. With Amazon and Splunk. Appreciate it. Thanks for clarifying. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it. Scott Ward, Principal Solutions Architect for AWS Amazon Web Services here inside theCUBE at splunk.conf, 10th year of their conference, our seventh year covering with theCUBE. I'm John Furrier. We'll be back with more after this short break.


All from Hollywood, ladies and gentlemen, this is C.P. McGregor speaking, and welcoming you to another performance of your War Department program, Proudly We Hail. Through the courtesy of the Hollywood Coordinating Committee, we present the distinguished actor Mr. George Murphy, as the star of our show, A Song Is Born, written by Tom Petty with music by Eddie Skravanik. Jimmy Kennedy is in a jam. Jimmy's a songwriter gone stale, and that puts Arthur J. Berry, the movie producer right behind the eight ball, for Mr. Berry must have a song for his new show, but right now. But Jimmy... Sure, sure. I know, Mr. Berry. I promised you a tune, but I got a half-time. What do you think I am? A jukebox? Something you can walk up to, drop a coin in the slot and get a song? Look, I write them when I feel them. Well, you better start getting that feeling. This is your last chance with me, Jimmy. All right, all right, Mr. Berry, go ahead. Twist my arm. I'd twist your neck if I thought it would help. What's the matter with you, Jimmy? Oh, everything, Mr. Berry. I got no place to work. My apartment's a manhouse.  You live alone. Sure, sure. But the place is filled with people day and night, drop-ins, moochers. I can't hear myself think. Hey, maybe I can fix that. My wife's out of town. I'm staying at the club. Why don't you move out to my house in Beverly Hills? Beverly Hills? Hey, wait a minute. Could be you got something there, pal? No. No, it's no good. The birds would keep me awake. It might be a good idea to stay awake. I've got to have the song by tomorrow night. You got a piano out there? I have a baby grand, although I don't know why they call it a baby when it set me back a couple of grand. Well, even at that price, it's probably out of tune. But I'm out of tune, too, so it might be just the right combination, huh? Okay, you talk me into it. It's a deal. All right, I'll give you the keys and you can go right out. We'll let the servants go, so you'll have to look out for yourself. Oh, don't worry about that, Mr. Berry. I never eat anything when I'm working on a song. You never will if you don't write this one, and tomorrow night show a deadline, Jimmy. You're holding up production. Now, look, can I help it if I'm not a Hollywood genius? I'm betting you are. I'll call you in the morning to see how the song's coming. And if it doesn't come, I'll give you a report on the birds. Who said anything about working? I stayed awake all night waiting for this phone call and listening to your birds. What are they, cuckoos? There's all the only cuckoo out there. I'm not so sure about that. Hey, wait a minute, there's somebody at the door. You can't get rid of one. You better bring a magician with you. Goodbye. That guy makes me nervous. He still thinks I'm a jukebox. Hey, that sounds like a baby. Hey, who's out there? Oh, I didn't expect to find anyone here.  It is a baby. You act exactly like you never saw one before. Mrs. Berry said you'd be at the club. Well, I'm not. And Mrs. Berry isn't here. Well, of course she isn't. I saw her in San Francisco yesterday, and she invited me to use the house for the week. I'm Judy Watson. I hope I'm not putting you out, Mr. Berry. I'm not Mr. Berry. Oh. Oh, well, Mrs. Berry said the servants had gone. And I'm not the butler either. I'm Jimmy Kennedy, and Mr. Berry invited me to use the house, and I was here first. Oh, well, there's no reason why we should stand here glaring at one another. I won't be in your way if it's a big house. It's not that big. We'll work it out. Look, will you hold the baby while I bring my bags in? Wait a minute. A hauling a baby's not in my department. I'll get your bags. Oh, it's silly. The baby won't bite you. Well, I might forget and bite the baby.   Say, say, does it yell like that all the time? It's not an it. It's a he. And he's crying because he's hungry. Oh, well, I guess that's your department. I'll go out. Oh, no, you won't. You're not going anywhere until you help me feed the baby. Now, look, sister, I've done a lot of things in my life, and some of them I'm not too proud of.  Feed them yourself. Well, now, there's no need to get upset, Mr. Kennedy. Look, if you'll show me the way to the kitchen, I'll heat the baby's bottle, and you can go on doing whatever it is you do. He's got a bottle. He's got a bottle, a little kid like that, and you want to heat it? Well, certainly. You wouldn't want him to take his milk cold, would you? I don't care how he takes it. I'd boil it if I thought it would stop his yelling. His milk's already been boiled. Fine, fine, that's an idea. Maybe I ought to get boiled. Look, quit shouting. All I ask you to do is show me the kitchen. All right, it's down there at the end of the hall some place. Here, I don't care whether you like it or not. You've got to hold the baby while I heat his milk. I need help. Hey, hey, wait a minute. I might drop a. Answer the front door. Boku birds, babies. I came out here to find a quiet place to work. Oh, hey, Judy. Something's happened to the baby. Well, answer the front door first. Who are you, the baby's father? Oh, me? I never seen that kid before. Well, what do you want? I'm the piano tuner. A piano tuner when I need a plumber. OK, come in and start tuning. Our story starring George Murphy will continue immediately following a message from the parents of a young man who was recently enlisted in the new regular army. Mr. and Mrs. J. W. Bateman of Baton Rouge, Louisiana wrote the following letter to the commanding general Fort Lewis Washington, where their son was stationed. It reads, dear sir. This note is for the purpose of expressing the appreciation of the parents of private John W. Bateman, for the training and development that he has received at your post. He is leaving that post on May 10. And I understand will be sent to Denver for further training. I disliked to take him out of the university and put him in the army. But I want to say now to you that if all boys fare as well as he has, they would be better men in every respect to get the kind of training he has received. He has never reported any unkind treatment. He has never had a bad meal to eat. And he has never mentioned in all of his letters any incidents and condition to complain about. We are all for this kind of military training. And Fort Lewis is tops, thanking you and your associates. And the letter concludes, yours very truly, Mr. and Mrs. J. W. Bateman. The babies have found some canned goods, fixed up a tasty luncheon, so Jimmy feels pretty good. If he's late with the song, he can blame it on the piano tuner. And it looks like he's going to be late. Say, you know, that's pretty good eating. You know, when I open a tin, the stuff tastes just like it came out of a tin. What'd you do to it? That's a little secret. Known as the woman's touch, Mr. Kennedy. Jimmy's the name. You can't very well call a fellow mister when you're living in the same house with him and cooking his meals. All right. Jimmy, it is. But this is your last meal. You're moving. What? Oh, no, that's impossible. Your friend Mr. Berry's got me locked in here until I finish a song for his new show, and I haven't even started. Well, so you write songs. I think that's wonderful. Oh, no, no. That's the biggest mistake you've made today. It's an awful way to earn a living, spending all your time trying to rhyme words with love and bliss and moon. Oh, why don't you try some new words? Write a new song. There hasn't been a new one written in 50 years. You know, writing a new song is like trying to find a word to rhyme with orange. I know there isn't such a word, but you could write something bright and fresh. You know, original. Yeah, I know. I thought I could too, till this morning. No, I'm fresh out of ideas, Judy. Every brain in this old pumpkin of mine is just as dry as a dust bowl. Well, I've got lots of ideas. Maybe I can help. Oh, hold the baby. Yeah, yeah, that's the baby all right.  Well, I've got to get to him. He couldn't be hungry. Maybe he's got an idea for a song. Oh, stop being. Oh, Jimmy, hurry. He's holding his breath. I'm right here. Oh, look, look, Judy. Look at his face. He's turning blue. Well, call the doctor. Call somebody. Do something. Did he ever hold his breath before? Oh, how would I know? I don't know anything about babies. What? You don't know anything about babies, but you got one. Look. Look out. Look out. He's going to let loose. Oh, Jimmy, I'm scared. Oh, what do we do? Well, now, wait a minute. I noticed something just now. He only yells when he starts kicking. Does that mean anything, Judy? Oh, Jimmy, he might have prowled. Oh, folks, I got your panatone good as new. Oh, thanks, pal. Say, do you know anything about babies? Well, I ought to. I got five of my own. Oh, yeah, I hear him yelling. Is anything wrong with him? I don't know. She doesn't know. Well, he might be dying. Yeah, he might be dying. Well, wait. Sounds more like something's hurting him. Yeah, I'll have a look. Change this, baby. Well, she did. I did. Why? Well, there's a pin sticking the kid every time he moves. Oh, that's mean. Well, here, here, I'll get it. Yeah. Well, feel better, kid? Oh, how do you like that? Gee. Hey, are you sure he's OK now? Oh, he's fine as silk. Hey, lady, don't ever leave one of them safety pins unhooked. Kids don't like it. Oh, you want to sign this bill for the piano, Mr. Oh, sure. Sure, there you are. And thanks for everything, pal. Oh, Jimmy, look. He's going back to sleep. Yeah. Yeah. It's a good thing, too. Young lady, there's a couple of questions I want to ask you about babies. This baby in particular. Now, I think you just better let me explain things. Hold it. Hold it. Don't move. Don't even breathe. Hold everything. I'm getting an idea. I feel a song coming on. Oh, I know. The baby gave you the idea. No, the piano tuner. I'll call it the piano tuner blues. Oh, but Jimmy, there's nothing romantic about a piano tuner. Well, there is about this one. He knows all about babies and grown-up ladies. But that doesn't even rhyme. Well, who cares it's close enough? I'm a songwriter, not a poet. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. I've got another line. He can fix anything from a broken heart to a broken pot. Oh, that's even worse. I mean, it's corny. Well, of course. All hit songs have to have the old corn. That's what makes it a sure fire for a production number in Barry's show. Wait a minute. I've got the tune for it, too. I suppose it'll sound just like a piano tuner at work. What do you know? You've been reading my mind. There'll be a lot of zings and twangs and crashes and plenty of sweet notes. Come on, Judy. I need you for the romance. Come on, right now. We'll try it on the piano while I'm hot. I thought I told you to keep the front door locked. Well, if it isn't Mr. Barry. Hello, Jimmy. Hey, where'd you find this beautiful girl? Judy, why is she just strolled into my life this morning? Oh, are you Mr. Barry? Yes. You must be Judy Watson. And according to Mrs. Barry, you're her favorite girl. She's mine, too. She helped me find the song we've been looking for. I've been outside listening for 20 minutes. It's unnatural, Jimmy. And it goes right into the show.  Oh, I forgot all about him. Well, who's baby? Well, Judy's, of course. Where'd you think I'd pick up a baby? Judy isn't married? Not married. I've been trying to tell him it's my sister's baby. I'm just keeping him today while she's looking for a house. Oh, so that's the answer. Mr. Barry, you better go see what the kid wants. You see, Judy and I have some unfinished business to straighten out, right, Judy? Right, Jimmy. And Mr. Barry, if you find any open safety pins, close them. This is George Murphy speaking. Before leaving you, I am honored to present the commanding general of the Army Air Forces, General Carl Spotz, who has an important message for us, General Spotz. Within the past year, the Army Air Forces have undergone a great change. Planes that gave us aerial supremacy over Germany and Japan now rest at storage airfields. Last year's airborne armadas face obsolescence. Jet propulsion, rockets, and nuclear fission have changed the military outlook of the world. Long-range striking power has become a primary weapon. Recognizing these changes, the Army Air Forces have set up the structure for a modern air force in being. The foundation of the structure is a vigorous program of research and development. The skeleton must be a highly skilled group of technicians. We were fortunate during the recent war. The air weapons available at the beginning of the war did not bridge the ocean surrounding us. Great Britain's heroic stand gave us two years to build up our own military forces. As we built, our air force rose from a fifth-rate power to world preeminence. Flying against Germany, our allied air forces obliterated the Luftwaffe and became a major factory in our victory. In the fight against Japan, our B-29 delivered the knockout blow. We are proud of our past achievements. But yesterday's valor cannot win tomorrow's war. Our national security, then, will depend to a major extent on maintaining a modern air force in being. Such a force, a breast of science and inconstant readiness, can stop threats of aggression before those threats materialize and destroy us. Thank you, General Spots. And I thanks also to Mr. George Murphy for appearing on this program. Proudly, we hail will come to you again over this station next week. Listen in.