What's up everyone it's your girl Kenzie here from Leading Sports Cards and I'm ripping brand new release today We've got 21 22 panini. Dona's basketball Uh, dona's optic basketball hobby six box break number five pick your team Think over the teams and then we'll get started a didn't be with the heat by young I jazz christian b hawks curt s sixers Hung line nets james f Celtics jeffree h would be calves and warriors Jordan n blazers king l bulls ken w grizzlies kyle m T-wolves lairsack wise spurs long j nuggets matt s bucks michael c clippers patrick c sons rob d magic saco k raptors scott y pelicans shagnori u with the pistons and wizards steven c lakers steven roy s with the pacers tenevot s kings tracy c hornets wane s nicks william p Mavs wing c thunder and yip h with the rockets All right best of luck everybody Thanks again for filling us up. Let's see what we can get again. We've been pretty hot so far with optic today Love to see it some very nice Autos coming out some nice color rookies Haven't pulled a rookie photon yet. That's what I want. Let's pull one of those before The end of the daytime breaks big photon rookie all the all the uh photons have been like vets. We have pulled some bigger vets though Dremont green a d Who else was there? Wizard it was a wizard wasn't it Okay, I remember the third we pulled three photons so far james harden hollow A ha some rj best of luck man. What break did you hop in? of dama First break mojo is a thing So good luck That's awesome. Love to see new names new faces iodosumu rated rookie and hollow rated rookie jason preston clippers rated rookie quit and grinds. We have orange to 199 zion wiliamson light it up zac levine Oh select each two nice best of luck great brown hollow genre rant very nice And i'm hunting for those exclusive discos out of there hollow lanzo ball Sorry it's fun Oh god, jonathan comminga rated rookie devin booker all stars gonna roll the dice one two three left four five six Right that'll go for the rest of the break unless it's a one of one That is a six So we'll go right side all all stars inserts going to the right side wise camp Got hollow milley feasley Kate cutting ham pull from the back. We've got our auto raining threes ray allen Super sonics go to the thunder First auto up. We've got bowls iodosumu on the rated rookie Man, he's been hot in this product. I've been seeing him a lot. There you go. Chicago very nice Him and uh metta world peace hollow d hunter for the meta world peace auto earlier That's a unique one. We've got blue carl anthony towns for the t wolves to 59 21 to 59 201 james book night cream Abdul jabbar 75 years insert scotty louis we've got lime green to 149 carl anthony towns All stars going to the right carmelo anthony here at wiggins rain threes play thompson scotty barns rated rookie and hollow eric gordon last pack box one Jalen johnson and star gazing hollow anthony davis All right, let's see some more color this rookie color this box box two Again everyone we are all filled up for the daytime breaks plenty of room left Magic matt is currently live over on the lsc baseball channel Ripping some baseball breaks. He has some bowlin jumbo hta box is coming up pick your team with teams still left uh cream Abdul jabbar And you can find his schedule at ladiesportscards.com under the break schedules tab just click on matt's mlb baseball breaks and he's got a few more breaks up with spots remaining Bones highland rated rookie and hollow rated rookie key on johnson And then what I say four total breaks. I think the forest has a spots remaining everything else sold out We've got hollow all stars going to go to the right bradley bill Um his optic basketball is sold out next one. We're trying to get filled for him is a 12 box full case break of bundesliga bundesliga soccer it's here one Shengyu we've got out of 99 blazers on the dominators auto cj. McCollum We go portland nice one there Zion So you had that one and then three of the five box random teams Of the new uh select each two football step curry on the hollow We just saw her in football with brace remaining Do you believe he still has room left for personals as well? We've got anthony davis on the red 73 of 99 Just this week. We've had like we have like eight different new uh products on the site Available for personals giling green rated rookie a lot of really cool stuff Including a new hockey product. We ripped a couple of them the other night the clear cuts.  What what product is it? Um Clearly clearly baseball it's one encased card summer acetates We've got lighted up kairi on the hollow pulled a canvas the other night that was autographed We've got the optic of course h2 Got hollow zion another new one that I just saw that was added is leaf best of sport. Those are really cool ripped those in the past A little bit of uh every sport in that Got leaf metal draft football Yeah, so there's like 10 different products that have been added this week of uh Personals available tim duncan and we'll also be doing um going back to monday night to be doing personals There for a bit. We've got lighted up red zac labin on the red color match to 99 their bowls Um, so yeah, I'll be back monday nights and do them personals Schedule switched up a little bit hollow rated rookie isiah Todd We're looking forward to that rated rookie evin mobly pink velocity eric gordon is 79 for the rockets 35 79 You saw what pulled Gucci? moses moody rated rookie Bible lighted up jason tatum And then we have um some new soccer The stadium club chrome those are always sick. Love the photography on that product sugs hollow halliburton What else we've got chronicles racing and ufc. That's also in stock Like bride orange. It's 199 bradley biel of the hockey. Yeah That's a really cool product Limited amount of of that. So once that's sold out um trailer for the third hollow I believe that's all we all we have on those clear cuts one 149 99 a box A really cool product. All right box three hollow clay thompson charie cooper hollow raiding threeps Cameron thomas lighted up tray young jaden springer yannis dominators hollow drew holiday Pink velocity rated rookie kessler edwards for the nets. That is 58 of 79 All right starting it up with some rucky color. Love to see it Isaiah Todd 75 years chris middleton Redemption i haven't seen another redemption here since the first box julius randall. Let's see what we got A alfred shingoon rated rookie signatures. That will be rockets Rockets on the alfred shingoon Guy jones hollow raider rookie darin sharp They livers orange pj washington jr. 199 on stargazing JT for all stars hollow gonna go to the right with D rose chris duarte rated rookie Anthony we've got blue step karita 59 31 to 59 there one off of that jersey number train man rated rookie and hollow 35 years alonzo morning That was bassy right paul george Say jackson hollow jalen brunson again Primo red deandre drummond in 99 sixers Clyde glide 75 years Robert jones red all stars, uh, paul george going to the right 15 of 99 on that one Got josh giddy and hollow davante grand for the pelicans Cleverons having a great friday Now a lot of people look forward to their three-day weekend We're not having fun plans. We're williams hollow zacklevine to the right hollow chris middleton avid johnson orange the 199 rj barrett nicks So i'm shawn moose mongerubah How's it going kiss for Hello, michael robinson Moses moody rated rookie. We've got hollow lights. Uh, uh, light it up. Sorry devin booker 75 years charles barkley We're on ready for college football tomorrow. Jalen sucks rated rookie bam out of bio light it up lebron james bryan hollow raider rookie scottie louis hornets We've got black velocity gordon hayward for the hornets 13 of 39 Thanks black velocity first one of those we've seen this break Any threes paul george We're really colored and then like the optic hollows. We've got to 199 city cabay Now there's the ssp, which is a photon Which is also a chase Some rookie photons hard hits there for sure Yeah, a little numbered of the of the bigger rookies and then of course the autos Got bones highland rated rookie lucavich a Dominator jr. Jonathan isekalo Um, they do make downpounds for basketball. It's just not an optic. It's in panini one-in-one basketball Look at garza. We've got for the sixers rated rookie auto of charles bassie Last team taken there you go sixers Gonna go, uh, right d weight with the heat Someone asked that same question earlier hollow Kyle lowery She thinks they would just because you know optic football has a downtown But no it's different for basketball. Jalen green rated rookie got pink velocity of jeremy grant to 79 pistons 25 is 79 You would think so but I mean kessler edwards moses moody hollow Yeah, but I mean like if you look at the the coloring for The coloring and the numbers for optic. It's different between the sports to same as prism Easier if everything like a line, you know all the sports, but it definitely keeps you on your toes that it's not Makes you do your homework. All right box five here Rated rookie kate cunningham. There you go pistons first kate hollow of the day Very nice First one there. We've got lime green tray young. That's out of 149 97 of 149 What a lot of tray colors today, too Speaking of there's a base tray Raining threes bag Kai jones carmelone on the right charles bassie raining threes hollow stuff curry Hollow bobby portis Cooper light it up russell westbrook We are re-watching the princestate and purdougine Camera thomas tim donkin 75 years not much on tv right now Got hollow miles bridges hornets Primo orange city bay to 199 pistons Herbert jones Got rated rookie magic Magic cards who's got in this time rob d on the hollow vogner A little bit of streaks there on the ink itself looks like it was just the pen that he was using Nice vogner congrats on that. We will mag that and the rookie scotty barns Nice pack there Got josh gitty rated rookie and hollow donovan michael scotty lewis red evan another one Back-to-back packs with some heat calves jeffrey h beautiful hit there on the mogul 17 out of 99 Do see a little bit of dimples on this one as well. Unfortunately.  It looks sick Next almanac karson. I believe is going to be a personals run We should have some info coming out here within the next couple weeks carl anthony towns hollow But yeah rich settle the next run will be uh another personal almanac. Those are a lot of fun All right last box here Another very nice, uh half case Telling the optic has been very nice so far to us today and pulling some really nice cards robinson url steven adams Yeah, no problem Not sure on the uh the buy-in on that Um Again, we'll have we'll have some info out here Soon though for you So you are not the only one asking Everyone saw that last almanac. It's like when's the next one lane does an awesome job putting those together And I have a lot of fun doing that too We love ripping that for y'all too hallo chuma oki Jake's favorite song Jonathan kominga raider rookie and light it up kevindor rant It'll be a fun set to collect that light it up and all of those We've got lime green raider rookie santi adama 106 of 149 iodo sumu for the bull star gazing ad Quentin grimes jaw Spa hallo marcus smart Got kade conningham raider rookie base Bridges and star gazing hallo james harden He does 75 years Clyde Drexler All right the rookies insert jalen sucks DJ washington hallo raider rookie jaden springer sixers orange matisse thible to 199 sixers We've got 1099 nicks optographs of mild mc brine Nicks another team that's been hot today with autos all stars on the right vince carter Franz Wagner raider rookie. We've got hallo wendell carter jr Wise camp black velocity three of 39 moses moody Four years color has been just nutty today Wow Golden state jeffrey h i'm gonna break first the um Mobley and now the moody wow three of 39 one off of that jersey number Done that a few times today too beautiful black velocity there congrats on that jeffrey. We will mag that one for you All right a couple packs left and we'll do a recap Another fantastic half case james harden hallo Last pack josh christopher and hallo raiding threes dame dala All right recap time here Thank you We had hallo raider rookie kade conningham pistons our autos suje mc collin blazers Redemption for the rockets elfin shengun on the raider rookie signatures Charles bassie sixers isle don sumo for the bowls optographs miles mc grind that was 94 of 99 And our mags cards. We've got the red mobley raided rookie 17 of 99 calves The black velocity raided rookie moses moody for the warriors three out of 39 And the hallo raided rookie on card franz vodner magic fantastic half case once again Congrats everyone. Thank you so much. We got some more coming right up


The study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression rates in the United States from 2011 to 2021. The authors found that depression rates were already rising prior to the pandemic, and there was no significant change in depression rates at the start of the pandemic compared to previous trends. However, they did observe a 3% increase in depression rates in 2021. Additionally, the study found that certain demographic groups experienced more pronounced increases in depression rates than others.


My research focuses on one of the deadliest type of skin cancer, melanoma. I understand that we have been in a war with cancer for probably more than 50 years. Now we reached some tipping point that we may have a win in this battle. Those hopes are there. I believe that we will be victorious. I want to say that cancer patients, that we are there and try to help you.


So hi, today we will change, we will start a new argument, which is differentiation and integration. Ok, so I start by giving a definition of a Vitalic covering. So we consider with a note, with this Vitalic high, a collection of intervals. And then we say that high covers a set E. OK, zelo sez, E, dva א, ki sez. V tudi v vitaliji, OK, je v tebelji matematik.  OK? OK. Zato letimo, da bilo, da je zelo za v Vitalij, tako, da je za sedem, neč začel, tako, da je za sedem, da bo ne ni, 7, which is a subset of R, such that the outer measure of V is finite. So actually the set needs to not to be measurable. You can take any set.  V svečnih sejnjih. Ok, danes, Lema tači, da, za vse epsilon pozitiv, je vse finajte sekvence in intervali, vse vse finajte vse finajte vse finajte koleksjon I1 koleksjon, I1, In of intervals, of course, in our in our class I, such that you have that the outer measure of E minus the union of this this finite union is small is less than epsilon. Ok, the proof. Ok, so let me so without loss of generality without no loss of generality we can assume that that the intervals in the collection are closed in I are closed because in any case we can switch from closed interval to open interval by means of the endpoint, which has measure zero, ok, because you have that the outer measure up. So we started a new argument which is about differentiation integration and I give a definition of Vitali covering so Vitali covering you start from a set in R which is not necessarily measurable and you say you start by a collection of intervals you say that this collection covers this set he for any epsilon you can find and for any X in E you can find an interval in this collection such that X belongs to the interval and the length of the interval is arbitrarily small, ok. Then now I'm going to prove this lemma which is known under the name of Vitali and it tells you basically that if you have a Vitali covering then you can you can somehow express your set E, which is any set set E can be covered almost by means of a finite sequence of interval, ok, in this sense here. Ok, so we consider O, an open set such that we saw that there exists this open set O such that ok, O contains E and you have that the measure of O is less than the outer measure of V plus epsilon, ok. Ok, the next step is somehow to reduce the Vitali covering of the statement so to modify it to slightly change using this open set O and I will tell you how we modify this Vitali covering so instead of denoting with this capital this Vitali i we will denote with this somehow Vitali j, if you want. Ok, this will be a family the collection of the interval, which is in i such that i is contained in O ok, we claim that this is still a Vitali covering for E so j is a Vitali covering for E ok, so we take, so we have to select a point x in E and some eta ok, eta plays the role of epsilon of the previous definition eta positive ok, then in particular we have that since O contains E we have that sorry x in E x belongs to O and hence being open we have that there exists some delta positive such that you have that you can find delta small so that this open interval is contained in O ok, then by definition of Vitali covering for i for our starting collection ok, what we can infer we have that there exists this i in i such that you have that x belongs to i and the length of i you can choose this so that this length is less than the minimum between eta and delta you can always choose this i so that this is arbitrary small so you can always find this ok, so from this you have that i belongs to this modified covering because i is contained in O and is such that you have x belongs to i and the length of i is less than our eta that we fixed at the beginning so actually we have that also this slight modification leads to the definition of Vitali covering for i ok, within open set we want to define our sequence of interval in the statement of dilemma so we proceed by induction so how we choose the sequence disjoint intervals j by induction so we have i1 be any interval any interval in j you can choose it in an arbitrary way and then suppose that you choose that i1 and in have been already chosen and they are disjoint and then we define this quantity kn in this way is the supremum of the length of i such that i is belongs to the collection j and such that i intersected with one of the previous with all of the previous interval is disintersection is empty i which goes from 1 to n ok, now the question is are we doing the supremum on an empty set or not the answer is not luckily, but why so we have two cases we have two cases so either you have that the set e, our arbitrary set of the statement is already contained in this finite union so there is nothing to prove then the process stop because of course in this case you have that the outer measure of this is zero so there is nothing to prove or not so this is not contained in this union so we have that e minus minus e1 i1 union in is different from the empty set ok, if this is true then we can find an element in this set ok, so there exist some x which belongs to that set so belongs to e minus this union this finite union ok, so we notice that since this union is a finite union of closed interval is still closed since the union the set that we remove is closed then the complement is open closed set ok, so this is open so this is means that we can we can find delta positive such that the open interval of radius delta is contained in this set x minus delta x plus delta is contained here so its intersection with this finite union is indeed empty ok, now we use again the definition of italic covering for for x and for delta ok x and this delta positive and what we can infer we have that there exist an interval i belonging to this modified collection j ok, such that x belongs to this interval i and the length of i is less than delta as we have that the interval i is contained in this interval and so we have that i is contained in o and so i belongs to the class where we are taking the supremo to the collection where we we perform ok and so we have that k n is indeed strictly positive ok, then we can by definition of supremo we can for instance decide to choose this i n plus 1 the n plus 1 interval in the finite collection so we can decide choose i n plus 1 in j the length of n plus 1 is larger than k n divided by 2 this is possible, ok and of course this is of course we have that i n plus 1 this is just to remind you intersect the finite collection of the previous and interval is empty ok, this is now we notice that we constructed we construct a sequence so a sequence of um perverse disjoint interval ok, such that what about their length such that we have that the sum of i of the length of the interval i is measure, they are disjoint is the measure of this countable union and this is less than the measure of the open set so somehow this sequence is finite is converged so then comes an argument that we already used so we are in presence of a convergent sequence so we can say that the tail of the sequence goes to zero ok, so ok, the general term i n, let me use this um tends to zero and then we have also this supremum because of this also k n tends to zero as n goes to zero as n goes to infinity because of this ok ok, this is one fact and then the other one is about the tail of the sequence of the series so we can also say that there exist some index capital N such that the sum is small so I choose this strange factor epsilon over five and I decide to divide epsilon for five ok, now we claim the following we do this claim which is indeed the thesis that we want we have that this index N is indeed the one that we are looking for so we have that consider this sequence, finite sequence of reintervals constructed in a way just told you are such that the outer measure e minus this finite union is less than epsilon ok, now I prove the claim ok, let me call for convenience this set e r so we denote by r the difference between e and this finite union and we take some point x in r now somehow we deal has before so we have that so x is in r so we have that there is this some delta positive such that the interval x minus delta and x plus delta intersect this finite union is empty ok, and then by definition of Vitali covering for x and delta we have that there exists an interval i in the collection j such that x belongs to this i and the length and the length of i is less than delta so in particular we have that this i is this joint from this previous interval ok, now no, I mean no, it's quite tough it's proof no, this is a claim it's a claim in the whole proof but I mean, but once that you ok, if you want just a raise claim it's just say that here we are within the proof of the dilemma of Vitali ok, so ok, we arrive here ok, you notice that this series is convergent from this we can deduce the tail of the series is goes to zero ok, so you can find some n, such that this is true so you consider this capital N, which is indeed we want to prove, this is why I wrote claim, we want to prove that this capital N is indeed the one in the statement of the Vitali lem so we want to prove this we want to prove so it was somehow a statement of the Vitali lem we want to prove this ok, we are still within the proof of the dilemma of Vitali, we want to prove this and, yeah, now I'm going, ok I know it's tough this proof, but ok, so we found this interval I, which we satisfied this and we also want to prove that we want to prove the following we have that that I intersected IN is different from the empty set for some N for some N, which of course must be larger than N, ok ok, why? this is true, in fact in fact assumed by contradiction assume contradiction, that is not true ok, then what we have then we have then, ok, we would have that I intersected IN would be equal to the empty set for any for any N, ok so here that I would belong to the collection to the set where we perform the supremum ok to the collection where we perform the supremum, ok and this is for any N so we would have that the length of I would be less or equal than KN for any N but this goes to zero, ok so we would have that length of I would be zero, ok and this is not possible, ok ok, so this is true ok, so there is this N which verifies this so we consider just to fix the idea consider N the smallest number the smallest index that verifies this property P ok, then it is the smallest we have that in particular just to fix the idea we have that I intersected I J is equal to the empty for the J which goes from one to N minus one, ok because of the choice that we make so basically what we have is that just to stress that I belongs to the set where we perform the supremum corresponding to the index N minus Y supremum corresponding ok, then by definition by consequence as a consequence of the definition of the supremum ok, we can say something about the length of of I we have that the length of I is less than N minus one which is less by the choice that we make two times the length of I N and so I call this two inequality with this dot ok now ok, now comes the five so now would be clear why I decided to choose this five ok, now fix the knot with Y N the midpoint of this interval I N so let N midpoint of I N ok and I take take an X point X in I ok, and let I then we want to estimate the distance between this X and this Y N so you have that Y N minus X so I remember that I N overlap ok, so just visualizing in this way this is less equal than the length of I plus the length of I N divided by two and then we use this this is less equal than two times on the length of I N plus the length of I N over two so we clear so we end up with this ok, so what does it mean geometrically so it means that it means that X belongs to an interval having midpoint Y N but five times larger than I N so means that so as we have that the point X belongs the interval call it J N having the same midpoint Y N ok, the same midpoint Y N of I N and five times the length in symbol you have that I N is five I N ok, so we have I remember that X was a point in R so we have that R is contained in of N N plus one infinity of J N and so at the end we finally found that the outer measure of R which is the difference between this finite sequence of this joint intervals is less or equal than this is five times the length the sum of which is less than epsilon and so we are done so may erase as a consequence, yes as a consequence ok, now we state we state and prove the Lebesgue theorem which is a consequence of this lemma, of course so may erase this blackboard ok, so this is a fundamental theorem this part of the course was under the name of Lebesgue theorem ok, and it tells you that you consider it a monotone function so you have F function which is defined in the interval with values in R so non-decreasing function ok, then we have that F is differentiable almost everywhere in the interval AB it means that you understand what it means but to be precise that there exists derivative in almost at almost every almost every every point of AB ok, then ok, it is differentiable prime is measurable and non-negative and moreover the following equality also you have that the integral the beggy integral of F prime of T in T is less or equal than F of B minus F of A F prime so you know that it is differentiable almost everywhere ok, so just before proceeding with the proof which is still quite hard today so can you provide an example so the answer is is it really needed a strict inequality or we can just put equality can you provide an example of a function for which this is verified with a strict inequality a function with a jump for instance for instance, if you have equality with H which is usually known as the every side function as defined in minus 1 1 ok, so you have that the function is defined like this, you have this is equal to 1 here and equal to minus 1 here ok, the important thing is that he has a jump that must have a jump so of course you have that it is constant almost everywhere ok, and so F prime is 0 almost everywhere but you have that H put it in 1 and minus 1 so you have that H1 is equal to 1 H minus 1 is equal to minus 1 so the difference is 2 so you have that minus 1 of H prime this is 0 and this is strictly less than H1 minus H minus 1 which is ok but this is you can object that this non-continuous function there is a jump so if we look is there another example of the fact that inequality my holds with a strict sign within the continuous function within the class of more regular function for instance continuous function so we saw the example of a function which has many interesting properties which is continuous which is constant almost everywhere but is increasing the counter function the counter function so this is another example this is an example another example is the counter function so the counter function F was expanded in 0,1 in 0,1 if you remember it was takes the value 0 in 0 takes the values 1 in 1 was increasing and we have that it was constant almost everywhere so F prime of the counter function was 0 almost everywhere in 0,1 but it was it is also continuous so F the counter function is continuous because if you remember we constructed it as a uniform limit of continuous of continuous function and so you have that also in that case you have that 0,1 this is 0 and so this is less than F1 minus F0 which was 1 so you have the strict sign ok ok, now we need to introduce a set of of four derivatives which are called Dini derivatives derivatives ok, so ok, I will with the plus on the top F of X is the Lim soup H H tends to 0 plus of Fx plus H of the incremental quotient minus Fx divided by H then I take the minus so here you have the limit no, sorry the Lim soup but H you reverse the order so one is performed from the left the other from the right then you have D with the plus on the bottom F of X is the limit as H tends to 0 plus of the same Fx plus H minus divided by H and at the end you have the D minus of F of X is equal to the limit which comes to 0 plus of reverse divided by H ok, ok, of course we say that the derivative exist when this four number exist at finite and they coincide prime of X exist if these four quantities these four Dini derivatives are finite and they must coincide ok, ok, so now we are interested in investigated when when they coincide ok, what you can for instance you can an inequality which comes straight forward is for instance the fact that this Lim soup is always larger or equal than this Lim inf so you have that D plus of F of X is larger or equal than D plus plus of F of X and in analogous way you have that this D minus of F of X is larger or equal than D minus of F of X ok, now we prove we start to prove the Lebesgue theorem proof of the Lebesgue theorem ok, so to somehow so we want to prove that our function F is differentiable so this means to prove that the set where any two of these four quantities do not coincide has measure zero so for instance ok, we just select two of them and we prove for two of them and then for the other is completely analogous ok, so ok, so for instance just to fix the idea consider D plus F and D minus F ok, now we want to prove we want to prove the following that this inequality is satisfied almost everywhere that ok, D plus F is lesser equal than D minus F almost everywhere in AB so we prove this to prove the reverse is analogous ok is analogous you just said to exchange the rule of the truth but it's analog and then the same is true for all the other couple ok ok, so we want to introduce this set A as the set of X in AB such that the converse is true so that D plus is strictly larger than D minus F so in the claim is to prove that this claim is that the measure of A is zero ok I mean actually ok, actually this is not correct so in the sense that we we still do not know if the set A is is measurable because because when we define so when we define the the derivative we use uncountable operation ok, so we are not sure that doing uncountable limit now which because H tends to zero is not along a sequence so we are not sure actually now that this is a measurable set ok, but this is not important so we want to to express this set by means of a countable union of more nice set if you want so we want to express this set here as in this way as the union of when you have two quantities V and U with values among the rational number and such that U is less than V ok, and we have that this set is like this and we have that this is D plus of F is larger than V larger than U larger than D minus of F ok, just call a set of this type E ok, and now what we want to do now is that if we define with S the outer measure of E because we still don't know that even E might not be measurable we want to prove we want to see that S is zero ok, this will be our purpose now ok, so sorry, excuse me think at a fix V and U just fix it now we focus on a set of this type just think ok, so as usual now we have this set E and we know that there exists an open set U open such that you have that U contains E and and we have such that for any epsilon positive of course such that the measure of U of this open set is bounded by the outer measure of E so plus epsilon so S plus epsilon ok, then fix a point take D a point in E and consider this collection of intervals which I call I which has which have this form so they are C D D, I mean I stress that belongs to E and you have that this closed interval are contained in the open set and such that we have the following inequality, so you have that FD minus FC divided by D minus C is less than U than this U here ok, so now you understand what we want to to use we want to prove that this collection I is a Vitalik covering for E ok so we have that is a Vitalik covering for E, so why so this is how comes from the definition of from this fact and the definition of liminf actually so ok, in fact fix a point X in E and in arbitrary and some eta positive ok, then by definition of liminf here definition of we have that there is some C such that if C is in between D minus eta less than C less than D this C less than D the quotient such that we have that FD this quotient the quotient in the definition is less than U C is in between D minus eta and D ok the point C is in is in U ok so basically we have that the interval I defined as C D is what we are looking for is the one that comes in the definition of Vitalik covering ok, because this is trivial because D our D is in I and the length of I is less than eta ok and then if U, this U because because I use this is capital U is the notation for open this is the this module ok ok, so what I want and then if you take C sufficiently close to D you have that if C is sufficiently close to D then you also have that C D is contained in U so indeed we are within this collection here and this capital G provide a Vitalik covering for you ok, now now we can apply the lemma the Vitali lemma because we did all this effort to prove it so we can apply the Vitali lemma so we have that by the Vitali lemma that exist a finite sequence that interval resist a sequence that they have in this specific case they have this form C1 D1 C capital N the N J ok, this joint ok, interval such that they almost cover E in the sense that E minus the reunion is less than epsilon ok now we want to sum up this gap over the index i so we consider this sum, this is a finite sum of f the i minus f C i so this is less than u u so d i minus C i ok, recoljno that they are disjoint no, so this is equal to u the measure of the union ok, C i d i and this is less or equal than u the measure of big u, this is that and this is less than u times s plus epsilon and call this first bound 1 ok, now we want to use to evaluate the outer measure of e by using subaditivity ok, so we have that s ok, by definition is the outer measure v ok, now we want to split e into 2 set the one is the one appearing here, so this is less or equal than m star e minus this finite union plus what remains so the intersection plus star of e intersected ok, this is less or equal than epsilon plus this, I repeat this intersected so basically we have that at the moment we found that s minus epsilon is less than the outer measure of e intersection this finite union ok, now somehow we want to to repeat the same argument of before within this integral c i and d i ok and ok, so the idea is that we so we define e i as e ok, you can just fix one of these c i d i ok, in this way you can ah sorry, here ok, from this we have that that you have the i from 1 to n m star of e i is larger than s minus epsilon this come from there ok, because we prove that this is less or equal than the sum of m star of of e i ok, so we basically we argue as before but now e i plays the role of the argument before so again, so we can claim that we have that that exist an open interval u i so it depends on the index of course such that you have that c i d i is contained in u i which is and such that the measure of u i is less than m star of e i plus, now I prefer to take epsilon divided by n, in any case it's an arbitrary small number, ok ok, if this is not true I just consider c i d i intersection of u i we just replace ok, so consider take an e e i in this collection in this way so you have e h such that e h is contained in this u i so I'm dealing in analogous way e is in e i and such that I consider the reverse inequality f h minus f e divided by h minus e is larger than than v this v was the number which is involved in the countable union that I started right from the beginning of the proof, ok ok, Arvina, as before you can prove that i is a vitali covering for is a vitali covering for e i ok, so by the lemma of vitali by the vitali lemma we can select a finite a finite number of this joint intervals such that we have that exist of this type e, I use the index gel, ok e1 h1 until em hm ok, disjoint ok as such that the outer measure of e i minus this finite union is less than epsilon divided by by n ok, this finite union j goes from 1 to m of this e j h j is less than epsilon divided by n and call it denoted with these two dots and so we know that this intervals belongs to this collection so they verify this inequality so we will use it ok, just let me ok, so consider fhj minus f e j, j goes from 1 to m sum of h hj minus j ok, dis is larger or equal then larger or equal then v times m star minus e i minus epsilon divided by n ok, why because this is because m star of e i so basically you argue as before, no? is less or equal than m star of the sum of two sets, the one is the one appearing here and then you have the sum so equal then epsilon divided sum divided by n minus plus this, plus this ok, you understand, e j intersect this e j j intersection e j hj ok, now we want to write explicitly this sum to understand how it behaves so this sum is hm minus f e m plus h n minus 1 minus f e m minus 1 ok, no you have fh1 minus fe1 this is less or equal so we have all these terms, because so far we did not use the fact that f is non decreasing, no? now we use the fact that f is non decreasing and we can say that this is negative this terms is negative and so you have that at the end here that this is hm minus fe1 which is less or equal than f di minus fci because you have that hm is smaller than di is contained and e1 is larger than c this is a c, c i and c i ok, now we consider this difference so you have that f di minus fci is f is non decreasing, this is larger than fhj minus fej r equal than v hj minus ej these are all sum from j goes from 1 to m j goes from 1 to m larger or equal than v times star of ei minus epsilon divided by n if we combine the two inequalities we have and we sum up we have f minus f this times is i goes from 1 to n is larger or equal than v times the sum of the outer measure of ei minus epsilon this is by dot then v s minus 2 epsilon ok, finally by 1 we have that u is s plus epsilon is larger than v s minus 2 epsilon epsilon is arbitrary small so this must hold for any epsilon positive so here tells you that u times s must be larger or equal than v times s but if s is different from 0 you get that u if you assume that if s is different from 0 you would have that u is larger or equal than d which is a contradiction because we start by another hypothesis so this is a contradiction so we add that indeed s must be 0 so in this concludes at least the first part so what we prove is that d plus f is less or equal then d minus f almost everywhere in ab so the next time we will conclude the proof ok for today I think we can stop here


Is that a win? The fans are asking, is this not a wasted season? No, no. Well, hopefully not. It's a case of we're disappointed tonight with the results. Obviously there was some good stuff, there was some inconsistent stuff, and I think over the last three, four games especially, we've shown that we are good at times and very, very average at times, and I think today was a micro-ism of that. The game is all about being in both boxes, what you're doing in both boxes, not in between, and unfortunately we've got a bit of a bad mix at the moment where we're inconsistent in our defending, our clearances are little details in that, and we're conceding goals even on first shots, and we are not taking our chances, the opposition are defending well, but we need to be more ruthless in the attacking side as well. 55 was in the position, maybe 20 kick shots to 19. Well, I think you probably three or four times this season, I think I've got asked about the opposition goalie, which is good for them, obviously not so good for myself. Yep, he was excellent today, he's a very, very good goalkeeper, we know that, and obviously maybe he's a difference between winning the game and not winning the game, but we need to be better. I can't talk about his, him other than that, that he had a very, very good night. You've got a fantastic squad, you've had a reasonably clean-ish run with injury, why have you not been able to play consistent football? It seems like the pieces must be there for the team to do better than this. Well, it's one of the most frequent questions I get asked about my squad, and people will talk about example for today. So, I'll start up front with Coxie and Juki, and Bruce is a nine, and people will talk about Nikolai and Bernie, and maybe Troisi. Last week it was Nikolai, Troisi and Bernie, and people will ask about Juki, Coxie and that. So, what tends to happen with me is that they focus on the subs rather than the starting players. What I like to do is focus on the starting players, and I'll use Bruce Kamau as an example. Bruce has not started a game other than Melbourne victory at home, I believe, for maybe 12, 13 games.  But he was in the rhythm, he scored goals when he came off the bench, and when I threw him in last week through games, he started, two he started, he was excellent, absolutely top-notch, top draw, gets a couple of goals, and is an attacking threat.  If you can get in the team, and when you get your chance, it's starting or sub, and you do well, then you stay in the team. It's as simple as that. I'm trying to find the right mix and blend with my starting group. It's trying to find the right combinations up front. It's trying to find the right, you know, number 10 balance. Is it the right shape? Is it not the right shape? So, those are the questions I mean our staff we have to look at. We will look at it, but it's trying to make them believe that when they get their opportunity, like Bruce has done, step up, stand up, be counted, and you stay in the team. Does that answer your question? Is it a concern, though, that maybe in that case you haven't found your best selection at this point of the season when I would imagine most other teams in the league probably have settled upon theirs? Would you have that sort of at this stage of the season? Well, I'd like to, yeah. We've got eight games left, but eight games are a lot of points on the table. We know that. So, it's not ideal, but coming into it, I knew that you're having your mind what you think you would like to play. Sometimes it's dictated by suspensions, injuries, things like that, but other times it's dictated by what you think is missing in the team. You can be the best player, but not be part of a best combination. And that's what we've got to try and find out, and I've got to figure out that me and my staff with that, because, as you said, last week it was Coxy hasn't played. Coxy did play today, and we still lost. So, I don't think it's that. That's the right answer. We just have to try and... The players that are in form that train hardest and deserve to play will play. When they play, they just got to be good and obviously be part of a successful team, and then we'll go with that again. But, yeah, no, it is a concern. Are you looking to add to your squad when the window opens up again in a week or so? I think we're always looking to try and get better. If we didn't, then we wouldn't be doing our job at the football club. So, yes. Will we add to it? If we don't add to it, no problems whatsoever. We've got enough good players in there. What we'll say, the younger players are standing up admirably at the moment. They really are, and I thought some of them today were exceptional as well, and it gets lost sometimes in a disappointment of a loss. So, we'll continue with them. There were some good performances, positives, but when you lose, it's hard to try and pick them out at the immediate end of a game.   No, that's fair. Yeah, 100%. That's fair.  I come in with them open. Obviously, we haven't been in the finals for the last two, I think, years or three years. So, it's not going to happen overnight. We know that, but the building blocks that I tried to put in place, maybe I thought we were further ahead than what we actually are. And I've got to look at that and analyse that, and I will. But that's the target. You know, we still believe we're in with a shout, and we will be. You know, if we just got to address a few things, which we will do. But, yeah, 100% there's pressure in any job that you have, whether it's football or not football. How much urgency, though, is there on getting it right? Because you say there's eight games. That's not a lot when other teams are games in hand. Yeah. How much urgency is there to change those things now and get it going within the next week or two? No, very urgent. Yeah. No, I think that's fair. I think it's a fair statement. We need to try and find it out sooner rather than later. We can't keep waiting and waiting and waiting. And that's got to be my job. Sort of very soon, yeah. People will talk about, you know, other teams below you having games in hand. Can you hear me, sorry? Yeah, sorry. I was just on another question. It's fine. Go on. Adrian. Sorry. Other people will go on about other teams below you having games in hand. But you feel that you still have a fair bit of control over your own destiny? A fair bit of what, sorry? Is there a control over your own destiny there? Well, yes. Because if we win, it would depend on the games we've got left. If we know we need a, you know, whatever number of wins we need, if we win them games, then it is in our own destiny. You know, will we see movement in the table? Yes. You know, we'll drop. We won't go any higher until we play next if we don't get any points. But other teams got to play other teams. So it won't probably look pretty, but we'll have to accept that. But if we win enough games at the last eight, then we'll get to where we want to. If we don't, we won't. And what about the Vince was mentioning earlier that you've had a reasonably decent run with injuries. I know someone like Ziegler was out for a fair bit, but did everybody pull up all right from tonight's game? No. I think there's one or two of the adjustments I made based upon a couple of niggles that we had. So I'll give it the weekend, but there might be another one or two that might drop out. Can you give us any idea who they are and what their problem is? No, not really. Say he's one. His hip issue is just niggling. So he's one of them. Yeah, for sure. I'll give you one. Good on you. Thanks. You can probably work out the other, so that's fine. And then final one on the floor, Jonathan. Yeah, I'm Daniel Wolverine. Yeah. Actually, it looks very dangerous when he goes up forward. Yeah. So he's one of the most dangerous. That's a very positive for the club. Excellent. And I think last week you played three games. It's the first time he's done that in his career, and I would have loved to have started him today, but his levels in training, his data in training showed that he was extremely flat. That's why he didn't start the game. Obviously, Tommy was flipped to the left, and Georgie was missing because he's had a wonderful addition to his family. So he hasn't trained for a couple of days. So that's why Daniel didn't play.


Have you got your eggs and tomatoes ready?  The board of the KDE EV, this is an Ask Us Anything session, so you can ask them anything. It doesn't, it actually doesn't say any, it says Ask Us Anything, it doesn't have any exception, so you can ask them about the flight that we chartered last Thursday and spent all of our money on, so Aikana has to deal with literally an empty bank account. But anyway, so they're ready for your questions, and okay, the stage is all yours. Okay. Adriane. Maybe before we start with questions, we start with a short introduction, or does everyone know us? No? Okay. All right, so hi, I'm Lydia, I'm with KDE for I think 11 or 12 years now and on the board since six of those. Hi, I'm Thomas, I've been in KDE since 2008 and I've been elected to the board last year. My name is Aike, I got elected yesterday. I've been using KDE since about 99 and hacking on it since 2005 and became an EV member about two years later. And I hack on Plasma and some apps. I'm Alex Paul, I've been also developing KDE for a long time, over 10 years this year, and I've been in part of the KDE EV board for three years now. Hi, my name is Sandro Andrade, I'm contributing to KDE for almost 10 years already and I'm the board of directors since 2015 for two years. So the question. I have two questions, I'm gonna state them both and then the people I'm asking them of are going to answer them. So I'm gonna ask Aike, what does KDE EV do? And then I'm gonna ask Lydia, is Aike right? Well I think the EV's mission is to first of support the KDE community in its various activities, so it needs to have its ear on the ground. And there's always been sort of an awkward relationship between the community and the EV at times because the EV is supposed to stay out of steering decisions that the community makes, but at the same time it's sort of the only organ we have to make sort of a voting decision, so that doesn't always work. But I think it's about sort of, we've built up a lot of institutional knowledge in the EV over the last 20 years and it's about continuing that. You've learned well for your first day. Yes, I would maybe add to that that in general we see KDE EV as the organization that supports what the KDE community is doing. Inorganizational matters like the economy, financial matters, getting some of you here by paying for your plane tickets and so on, and legal matters, by for example, working with the KDE Free Qt Foundation in order to keep Qt free. Next question here. So following the question, and also the question I asked yesterday, the mission of the KDE EV is to support the whole KDE community, and do you think it's reasonable to elect to let all the members vote if one can join EV?  Now, right now we will have a proposal for someone if he wants to join the KDE EV, and after the vote systems, we will see, okay, how many voters and how many agrees, how many disagree, how many obtains, but do you think it's reasonable for people to join the EV? If I want to support EV, if I want to support KDE, why do I need to let other members agree? And the other question is the same. We have twice the voted vote number is not enough, but we still have no conclusion that if it is the vote you voted or we disagree, these people join you. So what do you think about this? Okay, so for a little bit of context for people who are not part of the EV or don't really follow the email as they should, to join the KDE EV membership, one of the, one part of the process is that you will answer a questionnaire and this will be sent to the membership and then there is a vote to decide if this person should be part of the KDE EV membership or not. Part of the issue that Franklin is pointing out is that one of the rules we have is that there is a quorum that needs to be matched and at some point there was a vote that didn't have enough votes for it to be valid and so the vote wasn't valid which is actually what happened, right? What is left to be discussed is whether that's philosophically what we want to happen in the organization we're creating which is actually a very good debate to have and actually it's something we should be having. I myself, I feel I'm in a position where I'm not an expert in votes or democracy. I mean, I have a notion like most of us have but I don't really know what would be the best solution. I can see how it's a problem but we need to have someone who is interested in this object and wants to fix it regarding whether we should have a vote or not which you also pointed at if I understood you correctly. I think that it kind of makes sense that if you have to work on something that you believe that is truly important, you get to at least choose who you're working with. In the KDE community actually there is no kind of vote. Everyone can collaborate and actually in the KDE community is where we are actually creating our products, we are actually creating the value that we add. The KDE EV on the other hand is an organization to support that and it's an organization where we have to trust each other much more and we have to discuss subjects that are not strictly related with the product in itself and I can see how this was, at least I can see how this was initially the idea. Whether it could be changed, it's obviously up for discussion as everything. I actually always believe that if something is considered to be a problem always should be discussed but on the other hand I don't really have the impression that it has been a problem in the past. If anybody wants to collaborate with KDE they have. I have not seen a case where the member has been not accepted in the organization. There have been some problems in the past that's for sure but it's always cases that are not conclusive as in we can look into the problem again and see what we can do so that this person who is trying to join can actually bring the value to the organization that he wants to bring which is actually what we are after. And if there are doubtful cases we should also actually discuss that. We don't have to let ourselves be blind by some numbers that haven't gone the way we like. If there is some formula that we don't like, we change it. We are software developers, we do that every day. We need to do it with our codes. And so adding to that for me the problem is not that there is a vote about whether people can come into the EV or not. For me that still makes sense. The big problem that we have right now is the large number of people who still have active voting rights but are not exercising them because they don't really care about KD anymore. This has been discussed at the AGM and people have brought up that we should make it maybe easier to set yourself to active or passive and maybe we should have another push in the mailing list to ask people to ask themselves, okay, do I really want to keep my vote? And do I want to either have my vote and also use it actively or maybe just not keep my vote, still keep staying in the EV because it's a bunch of my friends and I want to keep connected with them but not have a right to vote because I won't actually use it. And yeah, this is something that I will definitely want to follow up. During the AGM I said that I had written an email to the mailing list asking people to think about that and I had but it was in a thread which many people probably didn't even read so that was not really good placement of that but this is something we can change of course and this could already be a lot of help to have only those with active voting rights who actually are likely to use them and then we won't have such a situation with the too low quorum. So in terms of voting on new EV members that's a peer review system the kind of which we kind of use all over KDE and you actually get a lot out of that. For example, if you look at how we do developer accounts, we have very flat hierarchies within the community if you have a developer account you can commit to anything and that only really works if the strange are committing to your code base if you believe A that they are supposed to do that that they have the right to do that you trust there was some process that gave them those access privileges and that process checked them thoroughly and you trust that person, right? They have commit access and they should have commit access and also it's very important for them to feel that they are within their right to commit to your code base like it's about emancipating those people and for developer accounts we use the same sort of peer review system when you apply for a developer account you have to name a supporter and this admin will ask that supporter for input on whether you should really get your developer account and if your supporter okays that then you're in and what that process ensures is that somebody thinks you understand the etiquette of how the community works together and you're now fit to have a developer account and you can share those responsibilities and those rights and that's kind of how it works in the EV as well if you need supporters to join the EV and if a vote confirms that you should be in the EV then that immediately equips you with the feeling that you are accepted that you can step up to do things and at the same time everybody in the membership already will now know that you're supposed to be there so I think you get a lot out of a peer review system like that and now I always used to think as well that it's kind of awkward that the EV self-selects its own members and that could lead to like corruption and whatever but I think you also have to look at the real track record so I've been in the EVs since 10 years and I think there have been two applications that have been rejected in that time and there were kind of obvious cases so I don't think there's any indication that there really has been a problem with it and if you think it really has been a problem then you should definitely point that out and raise it and then we need to deal with that. One thing that happened in GD Spain a few, one year ago is that we actually realized that it was kind of a problem we were following exactly the same model we did in the GDV membership and actually the concern there wasn't that you would be having like some people deciding who gets in but it was more of a, it's a bit of a overly too complex process, right? So what we did there and maybe something we could export to the membership is that the applicant also sends a message with some questions answered and basically the membership can vet the person to enter if they know that they're a bad person or some or a crazy person but in general like there's no voting in itself this could be done but then it's something that doesn't need to happen by us like we're not your parents if you guys think that something is important you guys can propose it. One thing in addition of course if you've been contributing to KDE for a while and you're not a member but you feel like you would like to contribute to furthering the organization that supports KDE then talk to an existing EV member and for example all of us so that we can help you write your application and so on. And also in addition to that in the case where you become a KDE EV member of if you are already a KDE EV member there are a number of the tasks that you can help the board to do so. So we have a fabricator workbook where there are a lot of tasks that shouldn't be done by the board and so you are all invited to pick up one of two and have them made, right? Any other questions? Hello, considering the entry barriers for new persons or new victims on KDE I've seen a lot of frustration because we are on GitHub but we don't accept pull requests on GitHub. Are we going to try to loosen the tights there? No, well this topic whether we should accept pull requests on GitHub that was discussed very extensively by the community and in the end it was the community who decided not to do it and this was, I mean not everybody agreed with that but there was pretty broad consensus so that is definitely not something that we would ever interfere with. So as long as the community, the majority of the community seems to think that this is not something we should do and this is how it is. Again if you think this should change then what you'd have to do is convince fellow KDE contributors that this is a good idea and then it would certainly be changed so this is not something that is decided top down in any way. So I'd like to ask a question in relation to the previous question that was asked. Do you think that people in the community think that becoming a member, they're becoming a member of the KDE EV because it gives them some form of status within the community or could it be perceived or do you think that that's why some of the problems that we have actually happened and in continuation to that do you think like you could better define and better communicate what sort of people with what sort of goals should be in the EV and people with what sort of goals should not be a part of the, that's not what the EV is for. I haven't really encountered that. Do you feel there's a perception in the community that there's sort of a class difference between EV members and not because I haven't met anybody who is not in the EV and doesn't feel like they're part of the KDE community if just because they're not in the EV. Like have you actually encountered that in the wild? Yes, I wouldn't want to take examples, but yes I have, I did get the distinct feeling a couple of times that yes, so. Well that's the case and I do think we should fix that. I think it should be clearly communicated that the EV is a support organization and the reason to be in the EV is to get work done supporting the community and or make sure there's a representative sampling of the community in the EV so it can make credible and legitimate decisions and that's about it. Just the best case scenarios that it creates extra work for you. Right, so I think that we should have more communication in the sense that what sort of who, if you were this, this, this then you should apply to the EV's communication along those lines. Well one thing, one thing. I think that it's worth understanding that if somebody has been a long-term contributor to KD it's logical that they're interested in being part of the KDV membership. It's become, if you're committed lots of lines of code for example of or you've done lots of articles on the promo it means that you're involved in the project in different levels and you will be interested in collaborating at an organizational level so it's definitely something that should follow. And I know people who have been contributing that they have told me no, no, I'm not interested in the organizational part then that's perfectly fine and I don't consider them like lesser contributors or human beings but that, well yeah. Okay, so I'm going to ask the question that nobody wants to answer. Is KDV a supportive body or a governance body? Thank you. At the end of the day I think it has to be both. We have to have the organization that supports the KDE community to make academy run, to have our office where people can send mail, invoices and so on that all needs an organizational support framework. But at the same time, KDE doesn't have any other thing that could do that kind of governance. At the same time, for a large part of KDE that is a touchy subject because governance is a bad word. But at the end of the day, some decisions need to be made and for example, a long time ago the creation of a community working group, someone had to make a decision that we want to have that and we don't have any other body that could do that. Yeah. So I think the way I think about it, it's not a governance body but it's a tool that the wider community sometimes chooses to employ because the KDE has a decision making system and a voting system and it's the only one the community has. So sometimes the community appears to decide that somebody has to vote and then looks to the EV to do that and the cases where that crops up tend to be unfortunately sort of ugly enforcement issues. Like one of the problems is what if somebody misbehaves really badly and at what point do you kick him out of a mailing list and who makes that call? So when I was in the CIS admin team that was always the question, is the CIS admin team the body that decides who to kick out of the mailing list or is that the list moderator or does the EV do that? And I can think of one case where essentially it ended up being escalated to the EV membership and something was decided at the General Assembly and that set sort of an interesting precedent I suppose and that's where we are now. So you can say that there is a track record of governance decisions having been made and we should probably look into codifying that better at some point or establishing it better and then having a discussion about whether it's a good thing or not but it's what we've been doing so far. Me? Okay, me. I'm gonna ask about money. Nobody asks us money. We've always had the notion of the nation and money going to a common pot. That made some people create their own organizations because they wanted to have their own money. How do you feel about us having some... Yeah, I know. I left the board so I can ask the question.  Okay, so maybe I can start answering that. Interestingly enough, the times when groups want to move away is when things are great.  So as far as I know, all the organizations or groups or whatever that have done that in KDE have come back because it didn't work out. So I don't believe that is a viable way forward. Yeah. And I also think that we do need a common pot of resources, big money or whatever else that goes into the pieces of KDE that are not as sexy and that wouldn't necessarily be able to attract enough resources through shiny fundraising and so on. But at the same time, maybe we should need to think about giving the projects that do really cool stuff and that should get exposure and that can get people excited, give them some way to get a bigger share of that. How that looks like, I don't know, but that's something we can discuss. Yeah, as I understand, actually it's not true that all of them left and then they're all coming back. For example, Albert and I, we started KDE Spain a long time ago, we haven't come back yet.  It's not fun and actually it's a problem and while probably not they all have come back, they have all definitely had problems with bureaucracy and that's a big deal. Also, second thing, the reason why most of them have created an organization is because, unlike KDE Spain, which is a different thing, is because they wanted to hire people. So the question is, do we want to allow projects to do fundraising and then hire people? Which is a very interesting subject to have. It's something definitely to fix, but I think that we need to point at what's the actual problem is that people want to actually have organizations because it's fun and they're successful, but it's because when you're successful and when you can grow, you want to grow, so you hire people and at the moment, we don't allow for that. Hiring people could be interesting, but how it would work is not trivial. And actually we've started to look into it, but we don't have a good answer to give yet. So we haven't given any answer. And I think that apart from the whole hiring situation, it also regulates itself somehow because the projects that are more successful and that might actually get more donations in are usually also those who are more active, who have more people who have more people coming to academy, who are more likely to have sprints, so they already also get more money out of the common pot. So it's really, yeah, it always comes down to people wanting to hire people, that's when it becomes difficult. And yeah, we have to find a solution for that, but in general, I think it's not like there's some project which generates all the donations and doesn't get much out of it, unless they generate donations without being active, which would be weird. Well, I think one sort of benefit to having sub-organizations that hire people is of course distributing liability and that kind of thing. So you also get some things out of it from the perspective of the mothership, I suppose. Disclaimer, I've worked on one of the proposals for next year's academy, and I wanted to ask if there's anything that you can tell us yet if on what competing cities are, if there's been anything that's been decided yet? So we have received three proposals for hosting an academy in 2018 from Vienna, Belgrade, and Munich. They all were great. We discussed them in the EV membership and got feedback, and I think we can announce a decision tomorrow. Hey, I'm actually sitting right here. I'm wondering whether I should join or not the EV. I joined KD Spain because I knew they could use the help with the organization and such, and there's a, you pay a bit of money each year which helps support, and in KD Spain it helps. Thank you. But I don't really see how I could be of help joining the EV. I mean, I really don't see why I would join the EV. I don't see why I would join, I actually don't see why I would not. I'm not really sure what I should do. So one reason by proxy is that KDV gives the powers to KD Spain regarding the use of trade margin in Spain. If you are being given a right, you want to probably have some kind of control over that, right? There's a lot of reasons why you might want to be part of the KDV and you should look at the tasks we're doing. Like holding the trade market of KDV is one of them. Others could be, I don't know, FLA you can be interested in the license of your software. The KDV has been working on ways to make sure that KDV software stays free forever, right? Or the KD FreeQt Foundation. So these are all software, these are all subjects that are very related to KD, much like the work you've very well been doing in KD Spain. And I don't really see a reason why, the reasons why you join wouldn't translate. In the end, it's about having an organizations that back up the support that you can give into the project, right? Does that make sense? Yeah, it makes sense. And then at the point where you ask yourself, should I join, then most likely the answer is yes. Because if you ask yourself the questions, it means that you care a lot about KDEV and that is already going to likely make you a good contributor to the organization. Unless, like many people, you don't take the tasks that we're putting on the fabricator because then it's like, okay. Yeah. Yeah, I brought this up last year and I'm bringing it up again this year because of yesterday's, because of the yesterday's report on the KDE League, we are leaving money on the table in the US because we don't have a 501C3 nonprofit organization there. There are people who are willing to donate to KDE but would like to have those donations be tax exempt. So the donations have to be through into an US nonprofit. Do we want to do this? Do we have any preliminary ideas of whether we want to do something like this, whether we don't want to do this at all or if we do want to do something like this, should we form a task force or should we do something about it? We already have a task force for doing something like that but it's not really going in the way you like. We definitely want to have a better presence on United States, we definitely need that, we need to have a proper established community there which isn't there and that's the reason why we aren't holding the organizational bodies that we are, like we're not confident in it. As soon as we started to have many thousands of people doing organizational stuff which is a lot of work, like we said before, having an organization is a lot of work and unpleasant work. If we had these kind of people in United States, we would be, I guess, all super happy to support and get money from all of these Americans who want to donate to us. We need the people first. So yeah, if you want to make that happen, I think the next steps are first of all, building up more community there with the help of the people who are already there, like Valerie for example, and the other thing is help disassemble the existing organization that we already have. That is ongoing, but has stalled now, KDE League it's called. Once we have that disassembled and at least more community in the US than we have now then I think we should definitely talk about that. I believe you were talking about the, basically the donations part of being able to donate from the USA with, okay, hearing that, I'm thinking of TECRA, the Linus distribution. We have some kind of agreement with, I believe it's called the, it's SPI I think, so far in the public interest. I wonder if that's something that could work for having the donations from the US and having them tax exempt. We have done something similar for one sub project, Amarok in the past, not with SPI, but with, yes, that was a lot of overhead. So SPI might be something to look into if that is less overhead, yeah. And while he gets the microphone, it's part of the reason why we created KD Spain at some point is because having a nonprofit organization in a country is useful to get the donations in that country, it makes sense for that. But you need to have people, like the amount of hours Albert and I have put into doing it for Spain, you cannot imagine. And it's just Spain, which I guess that being a smaller country makes a smaller amount of work. I guess we have time for another question. So one more question. Sorry. And it's not passive aggressive cake. Okay, if there are no questions, further questions we can call this a wrap. So thank you, Bort, thank you, mothership. Thank you very much, everyone. Thank you.


In this video, we're going to be looking at how you can use Stream Deck with the Shortcuts app on Mac OS. And this is the fifth in a series of videos I'm doing all about the Shortcuts app. And so if you haven't seen the other videos I've done about it, you may want to check those out there all down in the description. In this video though, we're going to take a slight break from the app itself. And as I say, we're going to look at how you can trigger these shortcuts with the Stream Deck instead. Now Apple themselves don't have a built-in plugin for Stream Deck. However, there is a third-party app that works perfectly well and you can use that one instead. So let's come over to Stream Deck and have a look at how to get that, shall we? It is the usual process for installing plugins which is that we go up to the Stream Deck store right up at the top here. Click on that and that will open up the store in a separate window, just like that. And then what we want to do is come over to the Plugins section and then just do a little search for Shortcuts. Spelling it correctly, of course. And there you go, we've got two that have come up. Actually Lumia is related to lighting, but it's this one that we want, the one with the shortcuts icon unfunnally enough. And so here it is by Centenelit, I think that is how you pronounce it, without the long pause in the middle. So basically you just install it from here and then obviously, as you will know, I'm sure with Stream Deck it just comes into the right-hand column down here. And so we just have to find that and there it is, the Shortcuts folder, and there is just one single action in there. So I'm just going to drag this on to show you this demonstration. Now bear in mind that you may get prompted when you install the plug-in, I should say. You may get prompted to go and check your security and privacy section on your Mac. So that would be over here in System Preferences. And then from within here, it's going to ask you to go down to the Automation section, which is right down at the bottom. And then you want to just check that under Stream Deck you have got access granted to the Shortcuts app. When you install the plug-in, this will be put in there by default. It just may not actually be checked and so you might have to go and unlock your System Preferences and then just go and make sure that you have checked that. So that it's given permission for the Stream Deck and this plug-in to control your Shortcuts, which obviously is the point of what we're trying to do here. Now the way that you program this is very simple. You've basically got the usual thing of a title and then you've got the next two rows are basically where you're going to choose the Shortcut that you want. If you are very organized and you've got all of your Shortcuts nicely organized into folders, then you can specify a specific folder from this dropdown. Or if you want to just leave it the default, which is all Shortcuts, then you will just be able to pick from the full list. And so that is done in the next row down. As you can see there, it says Shortcut and then you just click on the little dropdown and you can pick whichever Shortcut you want from your full list. Now I'm just going to choose this one for now. This is the Shortcut that we made in one of the previous videos. So I'm just going to use that one as an example. By the way, there is a search box if you want to search for a particular Shortcut as well. You can use that way. Now we come down. There's a couple of other options that you may or may not want to use. First is an accessibility feature. So with this one it will actually speak the name of the Shortcut when you're pressing the button. And then the next one is Override Title Toggle On or Off. Now what that is is that's basically going to give it the toggle on or off the name of the Shortcut over the top of the title that you've given it up here. So that's what that is for. It's to actually override the Shortcut name with whatever you might want to call it in here. And that is what will appear on the front. I'm just going to leave this as it is because in actual fact, usually with anything I use on Stream Deck I don't tend to use the built-in text. So I would normally toggle that one off there and then just have my own custom icons so that I can see what the particular action is for. So that is all there is to that. However, there is a couple more things that I've just mentioned down here. If you scroll even further down to the bottom, there is a Discord community for this particular developer. And so it's a great place to go and join if you have got any questions about the plugin or anything like that or if you have any trouble shooting issues that you need resolved. Then definitely jump on in there. They seem to be quite active and responsive as well. So that's a great thing to see actually that a plugin developer has got a Discord community as well around it. Next down below, we've also got the source code which is available through GitHub as well. So another nice little thing to see. But for all intents and purposes, that is essentially all we need to do. So if I just actually click on this button now, it is going to trigger that Shortcut. And this was the Shortcut.  Enter your name, enter your location. As I say, this was just the example that I created in one of the other videos to prove a point about variables for those that are interested. And then click Done and then it says there you go. Hey, hi Alec, what is the weather like in Thailand? But that is just to prove the point that it is actually triggered by the Shortcut button and action on the Stream Deck itself. Now, that was, as I say, a bit of a departure from the Shortcuts app itself. But don't worry, we'll be getting straight back into that in the next video where I'll be talking all about how you can use Shortcuts with the Notes app for greater productivity. See you there.


In Nodhi Bangal, there are many houses in Nodhi Bangal. We used to build 3-4 houses in Nodhi Bangal. Now, we have to build 3-4 houses in Nodhi Bangal. We can't do that. Bangladesh is a land endowed with great rivers around the Bay of Bengal, forests and charming life. However, the nature's green and lives of thousands in Bangladesh are at stake due to the effect of climate change. To cope with the risks that has emerged due to climate change, Government of Bangladesh has undertaken different climate adaptation programs, but with some challenges. Various implementation challenges emerged for not adequately consulting with affected people and project stakeholders. One of these is the limited access of affected people to large complaints. On the other hand, project stakeholders On the other hand, project stakeholders are facing new challenges for the absence of effective grievance redressal system, even after filing complaints. Due to ignoring the necessity of consultation with the local people, their involvement in infrastructural construction works can not be ensured. As a result, lack of community monitoring is making transparency and accountability of the expenditure questionable. In spite of many constraints, one ray of hope is that affected people are raising their voices to ensure transparency in climate fund. Transparency, openness, participation, grievance redressal mechanism, all those things are perennial in the context of Bangladesh, but in this case, since it is a new area, there is a shortage of funds as a result of which this becomes more mounting a challenge. Whenever we get some complaint, we just take into cognizance of all those complaints. Transparency is not just saving money, transparency or accountability, it's also doing things efficiently. Governance for climate change is important, but I don't think it works in isolation. Climate change agreement has been reached in Paris, and we also have the Sustainable Development Goals, as well as the Disaster Risk Reduction Agreement of Sendai. I think the challenge now is that how do we bring the three UN processes together, Sustainable Development Goals, Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction. If the participation of local people and effective grievance redressal system can be in short, the expected outcome of the adaptation programs and hence Sustainable Development Goals will be achieved.