No one understands the importance of data more than the people who have to collect it and clean it and reference it when they build software Despite that many of us in that camp are flying blind when we make decisions Or we're basing those decisions on a very very limited data set that is easily available Particularly when we need to make decisions quickly Now the finance or marketing or product teams for instance might be very very data-driven But development might base really substantial decisions about how they work and what they prioritize on gut instinct That is potentially dangerous and wasteful and even when you get it right if the decision is actually correct It's very very hard to justify which could result in not taking the correct path Even when you guessed it right in our next talk Ralph Huck from Ligilica We'll talk about using the information in the GitLab platform to build a BI like experience to allow us all to become data-driven Developers, let's listen Hello, everyone. Welcome to GitLab commit and thanks for tuning in to our presentation today about building engineering Intelligence for software delivery teams Now in this presentation, I'm gonna go through what actually is engineering intelligence Why you might want this and then also how you can build it yourself? So a little bit first about us. So my name is Ralph Huck I'm the founder and CEO of Ligilica and we are data analytics company That really has got the mission to make software management pipeline management and software delivery Much more transparent Deficient and also much more fun for teams to use. So let me talk about what I mean by this So firstly, I mean you guys probably all know this really the world runs on software and not only on software but on software development and Software development obviously this part and is the people behind it. So Right now what why people estimate there's around 23 million software developers many more that kind of do is on a hobby level commit code and even in 2020 When you think it might have been a bit of a downturn There's an estimation around 111 billion lines of code Have been submitted and over a billion commits have been made to come in with code repositories So really it's underpinning large parts of the economy and large parts of our daily lives And a lot of this has changed. Let's say in the last year as you might all know People starting to work much more remotely working from home working Asynchronously and in fact, we think that's the new normal. So there's estimations around there that around 60% of all the Developers in the future will at least partially work from home So and that means we also gonna work quite differently instead of being together all the time in an office having interactions and Maybe learning what other people are doing more directly. It's gonna be a bunch more asynchronous and remote setting Obviously companies like GitLab that are already fully remote might have much lesser problem about this and then let's say More traditional companies that are now just pleading around. How do they make this all work? And this is really one of the big questions these days. How do you make this all work and There's a quite a number of key challenges in a setting That's more remote compared to a setting where everyone is in the same room And I think anyone who has been sort of working remotely in the last year can probably attest to it one of the key challenges is really to staying in sync with the rest of your team members and In fact, you're probably not staying in sync, but you're staying asynchronous with your team members So but then still the question is how do you keep on top of all the things that are going on? How do you keep in the overview and how do you can still deliver and develop fast? So it's quite different from let's say being in the same room and even though you don't have maybe this One-on-one communication all the time is still here. What's going on? You have a chat with your Colleagues and teammates and it's really much easier to have this team feeling and moving fast So the question is what changed once we all move remote well, first of all people start to work more and According to studies, they only not only work more, but they only deliver the same as they did before So in a way productivity really has been going down You spend maybe less time on commuting from your home to your office But you spend more time in front of your screen and you spend more time on chasing up to spend more times And logging into different tools and for sure everyone spends more time on video conferencing And then you have maybe these one-on-ones which take up a lot of time Now the question is what are some of these? solutions to this problem and It's one of the solution people have been using is throwing more tools at the problem and to a degree This is quite good. Let's say automation built automation test automation your cloud tools, you know, it makes life much easier and Probably you can work remotely these days the way you wouldn't be able even let's say 10 for sure Longer or maybe even five years ago But I mean with these tools. There are also challenges that are coming Firstly, you might have a zoo from two of tools each of those tools. You need to maintain you need to set up You need to patch There's a challenge of training people to use tools correctly then you probably have a layer on top about processes about what to use and best practices and what not to use and You know at some point they're diminishing returns. This means the more tools you introduce You don't get necessarily much more productivity because you get lost in all the data You've got sort of a data silo maybe and the planning then you have got coding information You've got your testing tools your build servers your infrastructure and so on And it's very difficult to communicate Both in terms across tools but also in cross teams that are managing those on those tools and To that degree, I mean what githlab is doing is really great bringing all those tools together and putting them onto a platform So basically you have got a simplified technology platform instead of a zoo or zoo of tools You have got everything is in the githlab world and obviously that allows you to standardize To accelerate the onboarding of new people and also to lower your cost base so instead of being too diverse you kind of bring things together and Make it much more easier for people to onboard To maintain and to get familiar and use the processes in a way that are intended Now the solution for this Technology platform we believe is only part of it. The other part is how do you then move? Activities through the pipeline efficiently. So let's say you start off with your type of Development teams that want to have high velocity. They want to check out features as quickly as possible Obviously, they depend on infrastructure. That's repeatable dependable Your build doesn't break too often. You can push information to life and at the same time you have got Quality build-in and this can be coming from your testing tools. Yes s s sca tools and so on but ideally you want to optimize the whole delivery pipeline and Right now there's typically silos. You have got the development team You have got the build engineering team or part of the DevOps infrastructure and then you have the QA and the testing teams and security teams and if any of those steps break The whole delivery pipeline from beginning to end breaks And at the same time you want to be able to have the overview stay on top and say, okay I want to see where my bottlenecks I want to see, you know, where I need to kind of put more attention and maybe more resources to it You know, also want to see, you know, share that information with my teams so they can get a better feeling about what's going on And feel motivated to improve because we all know if we've got a feedback loop where we can see Hey, our build doesn't break that often anymore or hey, our team now can Have a cycle time for delivery. That's much lower than it used to be. It can be quite motivating And this motivation again brings sort of asynchronous teams together as well So the solution that's been coming up and It's quite new. It's probably in the last couple of years And there's still a the right term to be coined Is engineering intelligence And in a simple way engineering intelligence is a bit like what business intelligence did for sales marketing business operations Bringing all the data from different engineering sources together and being able to query that data Being able to visualize this and see, hey, how was it going and where do we want to be and how do we improve and track that And the reason why this really works these days Compared to let's say 20 years ago because we no longer doing in most cases water for development processes Where we have got long cycles very little data and if at the end things don't line up We're kind of a little bit stuffed But these days with with dev ops and dev sec ops, you know, we've got so many iterations We've got so many data and we've got so many chances to optimize this And just looking at git lab. We already have a treasure trove of data. So let's say we have got Planning data and then let's say story points issues apex We've got information about merge requests. We know who has been doing reviews how often reviews have been done We know how long it takes until somebody picks something up and we know along Could potentially take from your first commit through a merge request being opened The review process being done and been merged back into the main line We might get information from our CICD systems about build success rates about meantime between failures if a build breaks How long the build takes and then information around quality like assess desk test coverage tools and so on Just imagine now you have got all this data in one pool And you'd be able to query visualize analyze this and maybe get alerted when something doesn't work as intended In that way, you'd be able to make much more Transparent and much more data driven decisions That are actually helping the teams to you know accelerate and be more inclusive about what's going on And this is really what logillica does logillica does connect to existing DevOps and infrastructure tools brings all this information together Fuses this information makes correlation about dependencies and then visualizes is and makes it available for drill down down really back to the original data So it becomes a whole data management platform And for us, we always call this a little bit. It's the bi for software delivery teams It really makes things visible that otherwise not so easily visible and it makes them transparent within silos and across silos So for example, you can see productivity data about your teams and I mean not about individuals, but really how do teams perform? What's the cycle time? What's the process is does it work smoothly? Or do we need to have more resources that people get overloaded? Information around delivery bottlenecks does my build break every two hours? Do I need to fix it? Does it hold up the rest of the team? Information from our SAS test and compliance tool You know, what's our security posture and which you know part of our Product probably has got more security issues If it has do we actually drill down and reduce this or burn down? Do we get more and the last challenge is probably around compliance? You know when you say, okay, let's say we want to make sure we don't ship GPL licenses Those things like this and everything goes according to our Intended processes and we do actually could do code reviews and not only claim we do them So that then gives you much more confidence in delivery And it also helps you to predict delivery times and being able to predict when bottlenecks are coming up on when teams need to help So for the next couple of slides, I'd like to drill down into just one of those sections and that's about software team management and software team delivery And so some of the data that I already mentioned that comes out of this is everything around merge request And one of the most critical business metrics there Especially in the agile scrum world. It's around team velocity Now team velocity on its own as a matrix is not the holy grail But it's one indicator coupled with a number of other indicators that gives you a good leveling where you stand And whether you're kind of running best practices or not And I've got here some of the logistical data we extract around cycle time cycle time is basically what we measure the first time to commit Until you release it or you merge it back into the main branch And in between you have got different steps These steps is for obviously the time it takes for the development of that merge request to finish Then the pickup time how long does it take for a response for somebody picking up it for a review Running that review and then merging it back and having the integration after the approval process And it's commonly known very efficient agile teams kind of manage to do this within the sort of 24 hours timelines Obviously if you're a remote team across different time zones, you know, 48 hours is probably something more realistic Nonetheless, if it's you know, this one spins out to two three days or something like this It really signifies some bottlenecks around your delivery organization So you will see You know the longer it takes the more delays and the more context which is everyone else has to deal with So because their merge request is not fully approved and then somebody says hey, can you have another look? I just did the review. You probably should fix up this one Sure thing. You jump from one topic to the next topic. You got sidetracked. You fix up that one Spend another 20 minutes to get back into your current job and then move that across So similar metrics, for example, like number of work and progress items that signifies Context switches and all this information helps you to understand really how your Development team and the engineering room works So it's more than just story points. We say, okay, we managed to do three story points per developer per week or something like this This is all good and fine but if your processes and your sort of engineering practices are not fully set up these story points Really don't mean too much because you couldn't do so much better and get everyone a bit more engaged and happy if things are running smoothly Another aspect Weird little lichelica look at and I'd like to highlight. It's around, you know, the flow of processes So and I've got here a chart. We're on the left side You see the flow from Merge requests being opened being reviewed approved And then merge back into the main branch But as you can see sort of the second line from the top These are all the merge requests that have been opened and then immediately merged Back into the main branch. So they completely bypass the approval and the the review stage Obviously, that's not ideal Sometimes when teams are under pressure, this can happen more often than not But you don't generally don't want to have this and encourage that And as a team leader or as a team manager, it's often difficult to see. Yes, that data is in GitLab somewhere Um, but if you you really need to dig into each merge request, you know, put this into your excel sheet See what's going on So and we believe this kind of views and this front of automatic extraction from your existing data Gives you a much better way to drive your teams and make everyone come and come together Similarly on top of here, I've got a bit of what's wasted work. Basically, you're open Merge request and close it without ever Merging it back into the main branch and a little bit of that is natural So because you know, there's always things that you figure out. Ah, I didn't really do it the way I should have Or there's things that you know, you've come to the conclusion. I actually maybe I redo something or It's really just a test commit to see if things are working and then improve of concert and then revert that again But we have seen it in other cases where sort of this from open to Close um can take up a last chunk of the team's work And that typically means that specifications haven't been done correctly Team members haven't been trained on what they are supposed to do or what their expectation has been And there's a lot of information around these type of Interactions between team members as well that can become More apparent once you click into each of these sections drill down drill down further and get to that data And logillica is kind of extracting all that data making it drillable and making you getting these insights and really understanding what's going on to bring people together Um another one and that's the last one and this one. I'd like to show you Is around some team insights and really when we talk about team insights We mean how teams are working together whether they're sort of conflicts because of reviews being bounced around too much in circles or people not working together at all What we really don't look into and don't want to see is sort of this micro management of individual developers I think we believe that's sort of best left for get into the one-on-one interactions Um, but it doesn't also kind of it's not the key of the value here the value is about how do teams projects and products move along the pipeline and this is really what you want to optimize And one aspect I've got here is a 3d demonstration or 3d visualization of your code base So each of these buildings is a file Each of these platforms is a directory and you can see you've got directories and then you've got files sticking up And we have this here overlaid with color about those files that ever have been only touched by a single developer Now in general, this is not a huge problem But if you have got too much of this that probably means your team is not collaborating when everyone is sort of stuck in their own little corner And it's very hard then if somebody leaves or you re-collaborate or you reconfigure your teams to actually You know keep things moving and pick things up and In fact, it might be really a challenge if one of your key people who maybe has contributed a lot of code and have been done a lot of Commits as we can see in this sort of tall building And then he gets moved to a different project or something like this. And that's really how you kind of also occur technical depth So in the end what we have and what we like to have is bring all this developer information together And logiliga does this out of the box and you have got different views around productivity team health cycle times and so on You can hear these kind of stand-up boards as well where you see okay, how it's been going in the last week or the last two weeks And so for our enterprise users, they can also, you know, bring in their own data Configure all this configure the drill down and really make it like a power bi for development teams And we have made the experience that really helps in bringing down, you know cycle time including improving the productivity By large double digit percentage, let's say 30 40 percent depending on the team and when they are And not only that but once you see that data It's makes it also for team for the whole team if you work together much more As well for positive experience and working towards it Now you don't need to come to logiliga You probably can build this all yourself because gitlab already provides you with those apis The apis to access all the data you have got graph qql You have got some web apis and can you can really dig and or rest apis and you can really dig into this and build this out yourself Our experience is you probably don't want to Because it's a lot of time and a lot of effort to Build this and then even more to maintain this So if you want to learn more about this Just contact me later. We can point you to do it yourself guides Or just check out logiliga and then we display that for you for free Especially the top level metrics So before ending this presentation I just want to have a quickly an outlook about what we think the future is going to hold And really you have seen we have got now these big data pools And in our view what's the next step and actually what our team is already actively working on Is building smart advisors that not only tell you this is how it looks But these are the actions you take this is how you kind of compare to the rest of the world And these are maybe your anomalies in in your team in your organizations And something happened last week You shouldn't have a look at this and this can't be codified typically in hard and fast rules And it's much more important to have this sort of AI based smart Integrated and then also alert the right people at the right time So not everything about every mystery. Let's say deadline in terms of you know blocking Merge requests or every missing review needs to go to anyone in the management level or the team level It's it's fine enough if the you as a developer get notified say, okay, I'll fix it up You can be much more proactive about this and you can be much more I'm staying on top of it yourself And it's really not not an issue that should be raised or could be raised and in a sense will matter At the same time from an engineering leader point of view You want to see the trends you want to see the prediction You want to see whether you meet your timeline and this is really important and the more the teams can work autonomously The better it is for everyone and it makes it also easier to Cut down on all this unnecessary communication that you sometimes have in a remote world so in summary What's we see as the next thing the big thing is sort of the smart value streams that really empower development teams to work autonomously sort of guided through visualization tools notifications Then the connection across silos as I mentioned earlier Not only development team, but the DevOps team and the qa team And then this more ai powered assistance to You know cut down on the unnecessary labor that sometimes Comes with digging into tools. We want to avoid any type of micromanagement in short so Join us and git lab for Building modern delivery teams and actually remote work and working can be fun And if you want to check it out yourself Just click to logillica.com. You can sign up for free We give you the main metrics for free and you can see where you stand in that delivery process Thank you very much for joining us. Um, we just wish you all the best for the end of the git lab event


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com coming at you with a 2019 Panini Donner's Optic Football hobby pack number five got three things happening here. We're giving away five spots in break number five We're gonna do the break that's the second dice roll and the third and final dice roll will be giving away two spots in That right there. So let's get the first dice roll going giving away some extra spots within the pack break dice list Let's roll it randomize it five and a four nine times top five after nine one two three four five six seven eight and Ninth and final time after nine Daniel Carl Martin Han and Derek Extra spots going your way that extra spot could could end up being Part of the big giveaway spot if you end up in the top two All right now. Let's gather everybody's names here Second dice roll will be for the pack break itself Let's roll it randomize it two and a three five times for names and teams one two three four and Five got Daniel down to Han two and a three five times for the teams one two three Four and fifth and final time There's the first half of the list right here and there's the second half of the list right over here And let's just print and rip Russell Wilson Jalen Ramsey Aaron Donald and rated rookie Tony Pollard You might be able you might make a little noise this year So this will go to Dallas that's gonna go to Derek and Dallas now let's flip back here for our third and final dice roll It's just the top two. So fingers crossed get your lucky charms out all that stuff Let's roll it randomize it five and a six top two after 11. Good luck everybody one two three four five six seven eight nine ten and 11th and final time so Lot of sad faces here Especially the three spot Martin very close But thank you for trying. Thanks everybody for trying But there can be only two sad times for this group, but very happy times for Carl and Carl with the extra spot that you won Happy times for Carl. We'll see you in that NT break a little bit later. I'm Joe. I'll see you next time for the next one. Bye. Bye


I Want to show you something pretty cool about Jesus something he said something he did why he did and said what he said it did And how it relates to you you all recall the story about the woman at the well in John For this marriage woman. Let's pull that up. Let's look at it. I want to see if you can see something that is I think it's pretty interesting In John 4 if we just start in verse 4 he says that and he had to pass through Samaria now before we go any further Why he said he had to pass through Samaria? We really don't know because Jews typically went around Samaria They didn't go through because of their their dislike Jews didn't like Samaritan's and Samaritan's didn't like Jews matter of fact Jews really didn't like anybody but typically Jews would go around but Jesus Leaving Jerusalem wants to go. He's it seems as though he has an intent on going through Samaria And I think that's probably the case because of what he Intends to say and to whom he intends to say it to let's go back to it And so he says so he came to a town of Samaria called Sikhardt near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph Jacob's well was there so Jesus where it as he was from his journey was sitting down Beside the well it was about the sixth hour so Jesus is tired And I think strategically he goes to this place where Jacob's well is understand Samaritans are Relatives of their cousins of Jews keep that in mind though And since a woman from Samaria came to draw water Jesus said to her give me a drink for his disciples had gone Away into the city to buy food the Samarian woman said to him How is it that you a Jew asked for a drink from me a woman of Samaria? So not only you're asking a woman, but you're asking a Samarian when we don't have any deals with you Which is what she says she says for Jews or in parentheses for Jews have no dealings with Samaritans Jesus answered her if you knew the gift of God and who it is that is saying to you Give me a drink you would have asked him and he would have given you living water Well, what is he speaking of he's speaking of not just water He's not speaking of physical water, but this spiritual water often times you see the Bible kind of Makes water and the spirit synonymous and in this case the same the Holy Spirit is what he's speaking of it So he says if you had known who you're speaking to you would ask him to give you living water So in other words Jesus is letting her know If you knew I was you'd asked me and it's he's asking the question making the statement So I'm not going to deny you even though we have this relationship your people and Jews That's not the way I'm gonna look at you We should tell you something about how he looks at us as well. We'll get to that in a second though Let's continue the woman said verse 11, sir You have nothing to draw water with and the well is deep. Where do you get this living water?  Jacob he gave us the whale and drank from it himself and Did his as did his sons and his lifestyle Jesus said to her everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again But whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again The water that I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life The woman said to him give me this water so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water It's almost as though she's kind of getting it But she's really not getting it and so now Jesus wants to kind of touch her He wants to enlighten her he wants her to know who he's dealing with and how does he do that? He deals with her past though. She doesn't know he's dealing with her past initially, but she'll know real soon Look what he says Jesus said to her go call your husband and come here the woman answered him I have no husband Jesus said to her you are right in saying I have no husband for for you To have five husbands and the one you now have is not your husband What you have said is true So let's so what we'll do is we'll look at what he says and Notice how it seems like he repeated what she says But actually Jesus did not Go back to it. He says go call your husband. She says the woman says I have no husband now I want to stop for a second. I want you to look over to the right where she says I have no husband look at the order in Greek how she says so she says Echo Andra what that means that Luke is not or no, I don't Echo as I have so not I have Andra a husband. So not I have a husband Jesus said to her now the English says you are right in saying I have no husband Which is how it's spoken of in English But notice something that Jesus did say he did not use the same terminology when Jesus speaks remember She said who echo Andra Jesus says Andra who echo Why is it changed and this is what the English doesn't bear out? Why is it changed because Jesus gives emphasis and she catches on as Jesus gives emphasis to the word husband Andra who echo now in Greek word order doesn't really matter in many cases But you can use word order to add emphasis. We see that in John 1 when The word Phaeus is shifted to the front to give emphasis of what the word is Same thing here. Andra is shifted to the front Andra who echo a husband not I have you said well when you said a husband now She didn't say it that way though, but she catches on what Jesus is saying Yeah, you don't have a husband a matter of fact a husband And so he starts bowling down her lane and then he opens it up even more He says for you have had five husbands and the one now that you have is not your husband What you have said is true. It was funny as he said what you have said is true Which is really not what what he said She tries to hide In what she's saying, but he gets that and then what is her response? She says sir I perceive that you are a prophet.  You people you all you worship what you do not know we worship what we know for salvation is from the Jews Then now and his point is that it's coming from This Jewish lineage and look what he says he says but the hour is coming and is now here When the true worshippers will worship the father in spirit and truth and the father For the father is seeking such people to worship him Now Drop down the skip verse 24 even though it's important but go 25 the woman said to him I know that Messiah is coming He who is called Christ when he comes he will tell us all things Jesus said her I look what Jesus says He says I who speak to you and he But he didn't just say it that way So she's getting ready to get an extra dose of something special and extra dose of really a revelation By none other than Jesus He says I who speak and he and he doesn't say In a generic sense in just a basic sense. I'm that person. No what he does says I am high who speak to you ego and me holl alone soy, which is I'm I am I am is the one who speak I'm he How do we know that that is more than just yeah, I'm that guy No, because look at how she responds She runs and says that she's found a man that's told me all about him Could this be the one and so why is this important? How does this relate to us? How does this help us? How does this kind of Show us something about how he treats us how he looks at us. Well, Jesus is going not around Samaria but through Samaria because John 4 says that I need to go or it seems indicate And the king James version kind of makes it I think a little bit clearer as well I need to go through Samaria There's a need to go through Samaria. Well, why what we're going to find out because we need to go deal with these samaritans because I have a desire to bring them in as well Even though as Jesus said salvation is from the Jews and so what who does he mean? He meets not just any old samaritan. He doesn't meet the the uh the high class Samaritan he didn't meet some some Some dignitary Samaritan clan. He doesn't meet some some famous person who's Samaria. No, just some old woman who's Trying to get by she's had five different husbands And now this last one the some some guy some guys sitting on the couch not married to whoever this guy is She's with him and she's I don't even want to marry. We're not even married. Whatever It's almost as though that she is tired. Which is why she says can you please give me this water? So I don't have to come here to this well anymore Maybe my lot in life isn't what it should be or what I would like it to be So could you at least give me some relief there and he indicates her past Meaning God even knows our past and what is he still willing to do? Still willing to interact with us and to even indicate Who he actually is as indicate as as interacting with us not just any old person But the I am is interacting which is why he said when he said I'm the I am That's why he used that phrase this ego in me and her eyes just lit up She understood and she went back and what did she do? Overcome with joy and excitement. She tells other people And we know that Jesus had a desire for the Samaritan because in acts one What does he tell his apostles when you receive the Holy Spirit? You'll be my witnesses where Jerusalem and Judea that makes this but then he says Samaria to the Samaritans and so he's always had this plan even when Peter and and John wanted to rain down fire because they didn't Samaritans didn't receive the gospel She said no you have no idea what you guys are talking about There is a desire for God even to deal with the people who are the outcasts of the world The social outcasts people who have had tattered and and tainted and bad past People that others might look down upon Jesus doesn't and so Jesus makes his statement to her I understand what your past is matter of fact. He emphasizes your past But what of it so what and so she becomes someone who because of him Brings other people what do they say? We not because of her story Now her calling us to you But because we've seen and heard you with our own eyes and ears and so forth Then now we believe and so the good news from this is that not only is God just dealing with The people that are that have a good past the people that are doing okay The people that soon have everything right good credit good job good household so forth No, he is also intentionally like he said I need to go to samaria I need to go to your backyard.   Amen


War. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing.  It's trademarked now. Please, if you ever hear it anywhere else in writing and a song, let me know so I can sue and get the money that I'm earned. Anyway, war is actually good for someone. It's for arms dealers. Specifically, the Lord of War. Based on a real character named Victor Bout, who was recently, I guess, released from a prison because he's not as awful as... No, he's still awful. He's still a terrible individual.  Or at least that's what Lord of the War the film portrays him as, played by Nicholas Cage. At the time of watching this movie just a few days ago, I thought to myself it's very bizarre that Patreon user Justin Merritt suggested this movie. Like, is it his favorite of all time? He has one movie he gets to request and he picks Lord of War on Patreon at patreon.com. Shout out to his movies. I was so puzzled by the whole situation and it didn't dawn on me until just minutes ago before filming that this character is actually based on what's happening in the news right now with the real dude.  No, no, no, no, no. I'm here to talk about movies because this is a movie channel. Lord of War came out in 2005. The film was written and directed by Andrew Nicholl who previously wrote a little script for a movie called I don't know, The Truman Show with Jim Kerry, ever heard of it? It's amazing. And thankfully his writing talent wasn't wasted on one movie because Lord of War is a damn fine film as well. I didn't see this movie when it hit theaters. I was kind of all caged out at the time. He was in so many movies so often that it's like, okay matchstick men's out this week wind talkers is out next week.   Give me something good. And I slept on the one I should have gone out and watched. Here Cage plays Yuri Orlov, a fictitious character loosely based on a real one, as we've already talked about. He and his brother are immigrants in America. His brother's played by Jared Leto who I'm now entirely convinced is really good at playing strung out losers. Pretty boys. Not so much anything else. Like jokers or morbiuses. It is full on morbentime here though and he's doing a good job. Everyone in this is. The premise is simple. Yuri, not happy with running a restaurant with his family, decides, you know what? I could do something better with my skills which means selling guns of course. That's naturally where someone jumps to as soon as they think, yeah, you know what? The restaurant business isn't for me. Making bullets. Making guns. Peddling them to different countries. That's the ticket. Even better though Yuri doesn't even have to do the manufacturing. He sells the equipment used. Like a pawn dealer who goes directly to your house. Except for in this case, the pawn dealer is pulling down six figures a day and he's flying all over the country under different aliases. He's got a lot of passports. He's got a lot of connections. Not just with foreign governments but right here on the home turf. America.  There will always be wars, he says. There will always be guys profiting off of war. So why not me? Why not me? I'm really good at it. That's his justification. For the hundreds of thousands of people he potentially killed by arming regimes by farming little children with guns. We see him running from police running from Ethan Hawke who plays the goody two shoes by the books FBI agent who's going after this dude. But what I really appreciated and was not expecting were the visual effects in this thing. The movie sets the table right away by having this amazing intro that goes through the little journey of a bullet. Through the manufacturing plant down the conveyor belt over the river and through the woods into the skull of a little boy I go. It is a brutal ending. As we watch this bullet fly through the chamber of the gun and into the head of a little boy unsuspecting, innocent.  It's about profiting off weapons. It's about playing the system to your advantage knowing all the players and then building up such a base that it's almost impossible for you to be locked up and that's exactly what Yuri does. And now we've seen, I guess, a play out in real time that this guy can't even be contained for very long because he knows the right people. It is amazing what douchebags can get away with. They have a charm to them. They have a swagger about them where even though you know they are terrible individuals doing horrible things enriching themselves profiting over the lives of others they do it in such a jovial professional cool way that you can't help but watch and step back and be like oh, I hope he gets out of this one I hope he thwarts the authority again and does something crazy like drop the plane on a little airstrip and give all the guns away to the local children. Haha, that'll show him. Why am I rooting for him?  The sleazeball the professional best of the best at what he does that you're sitting there thinking keep going, keep doing it but in the back of your mind you know he should not be anywhere near a gun ever again. I mentioned the amazing visuals at the beginning but there's creative shots throughout the film. One that jumps out to mine is about midway through. When a small African village is down a giant cargo ship within 24 hours all the way down to the airframe. Well, Nicholas Cage's character sits there on a box, handcuffed just watching knowing it's going to happen and there's nothing he can do to stop it he's almost impressed by their work ethic, by their skill set. Music was a mixed bag for me it's one of those movies where it plays a lot of the songs you've heard a million times in other films like there's that stock catalog that they're going from, it's like alright we got some U2 in here, we got a throw in and we got this song that you've heard in 40 different 90s trailers so while the songs are cool and they definitely work for the movie I've heard them so many times that's like eh, okay here we are again, I've been down this road before Bottom line, this was a fun one to watch, it's nice getting a competent script. Something that has some sharp dialogue so many movies now are just down for the masses I like a little wit, I like some humor, I like references to books and quotes from other things that Nicholas Cage is constantly throwing out that I don't even know about like there's moments where he will randomly refer to some statistic about an animal and its speed or what it does to protect itself and how it relates to something else that's going on in his life and I'm just thinking they just had that they just had that ready to go that reference, I liked it they took some time to work on this script to punch it up and I appreciate that, I appreciate this movie and I appreciate Patreon user Justin Merritt for bringing this movie to my attention so that's Lord of War let me know in the comments if you saw this movie all those years ago or if you for some reason decided to watch it because of what's going on in the news I'd love to hear from you, like the video if you had a good time, please think about subscribing if you haven't as I post tons of content every single week would love to have more people stick around alright, take care thanks again for watching the video since you stuck around I'd implore you once more to check me out on Patreon at patreon.com there are different tier levels of support you can do for this channel there's a one dollar tier all the way up to 30 and with that 30 dollar myth through a level membership you get to request a movie every month and I have to review it give you a shout out and hopefully either love it so much that it's worth talking about or hate it so much that it's fun to make fun of and with that I say thank you and I bid you adieu


I've found the top 10 highest paying work from home job companies that are almost always hiring. Yes, these are companies that hire tons of work from home and remote jobs and they're also really high paying. And number 10 on the list is going to be Skyward.com. And Skyward tends to hire writers, graphic designers, videographers, photographers, and other types of creatives for top tier brands. Now this is technically freelancing, but this is a company where you can get full-time work and they tend to pay their freelancers really well. For instance, freelance writers make about $70,000 a year. So freelancing is not everyone's cup of tea, but to be honest, when it comes to creative type jobs, a lot of the time you are going to have to freelance. So I thought I'd put this one on the list. Overall, I'll give it an eight out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is going to be broadpath.com. Now they hire for a ton of different positions. For instance, when I look at the website right now, I see they're hiring a tele-sales agent, they're hiring a registered nurse, and by the way, all of these are work from home jobs. But the most common positions they hire for tend to be customer service representative related. For instance, member service representatives make about $42,000 a year, and insurance agents here make about $63,000. So overall, this is a pretty good one as well. I'll give it a 7.5 out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is going to be CreatorUp. So this is a company that provides a platform for creative professionals to showcase their talents. And they offer jobs in various fields such as animation, video production, graphics, et cetera. Now this one does have pretty good ratings online, and some of these salaries reported are going to be $71,000 a year for video editors, $131,000 for post-producers, $75,000 for assistant editors, $83,000 for 2D animators, and $97,000 a year for senior graphic designers. So this is one where a strong art portfolio will definitely help you out when it comes to getting hired. You also wanna have proficiency and relevant software tools, and you wanna have effective communication skills. And to get started, you basically just need to create a portfolio, and then go ahead, go to the website, and apply. So with this one, I'm gonna give it an opportunity score of eight out of 10. Really good opportunity for creative type roles. The next one on the list is going to be Solomon Page. And this is another staffing and recruitment agency that offers high-paying remote job opportunities. And they hire for a ton of different positions. For instance, project management and public relations are a few of the most common ones, but they hire for a lot of other positions. I mean, they hire for asset protection analyst, financial accounting analyst, regulatory specialist, account supervisor, technical writer, et cetera. And they tend to pay pretty well. So this is one of the more premium staffing agencies. For instance, project managers make about $128,000 a year. So yeah, when it comes to high-paying opportunities for remote jobs, this is a pretty good one. I'll give it a nine out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is going to be United Health Group. And this is a healthcare-related company that provides a range of health-related services. For instance, they provide services in telehealth and medical coding. They also have pretty good ratings online from previous employees. So they have a 3.7 out of five-star overall rating on Glassdoor.com. And 77% of the employees approve of the CEO. And they hire for a ton of different positions. And just to name a few, customer service representative, clinical administrative coordinator, and business analysts. So customer service reps make about $41,000 a year. Clinical administrative coordinators make $50,000 a year. And business analysts make $102,000. So this is another one that's really high-paying and there's a lot of opportunities. I'll give this one a nine out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is going to be Bounteous.com. And this is a B2B company, meaning it services other businesses. And it provides solutions in digital strategies, technology solutions, and marketing expertise. And they hire for quite a few different positions, but one of them would be a business development leader. That's pretty good ratings online from its employees. And business development associates make $102,000 a year. So business development is basically a type of sales. Typically, it's a B2B type of sales and a lot of the time it's in the tech industry. So yeah, this is another really good one. They pay people really well. I'll give this a nine out of 10 opportunity score. The next one is going to be attentive.com. And this is a company that specializes in customer engagement and typically it's through mobile marketing. And they hire for a number of different departments. For instance, they're hiring client strategy. They're hiring for engineering, product, legal, sales, marketing, strategy and operations, people in recruiting and finance. And a few of the positions they're hiring for are engineering manager and product manager. So product managers make about $133,000 a year and engineering managers make 209,000. So this is clearly a company that pays their employees really well. And I couldn't find stats on the sales team, but based on the reviews, they pay their sales team well too. And by the way, you probably heard me say this on the channel before, but the easiest way to break into sales is by going into tech sales in my opinion and starting what's known as a business development representative career. And this is basically somebody who prospects for leads in the high ticket technology industry. So this is typically gonna be working for a B2B or business to business company. And if you wanna check out some free training on tech sales and all that you would want to know, basically any question that you'd have about it, I'll put that down in the description as well as the pinned comment below. And that's from the company course careers and a bunch of people I've interviewed on the channel have actually used this to get a job. Now they also have a cohort based program that costs about $500.  And at the end you take a test and get a certificate. But overall, this one's pretty good. I'll give it an 8.5 out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is gonna be gobesavvy.com. And this is a company that specializes in user experience optimization.  And they pay their UX designers really well, about $99,000 a year. So that's pretty good, especially for an art related career. I mean, a lot of people wanna get paid to do art. So I'll give this one a nine out of 10 opportunity score. The next one on the list is going to be Xteam.com. This is a company that specializes in software development and they hire people for remote software developer jobs. And they do software development related projects for companies like Coinbase, Fox, Riot Games, and more. And they hire all different types of developers from front end to back end to full stack and just about every type of software developer out there. So for instance, they pay senior JavaScript developers $201,000 a year. They pay iOS engineers 182,000. They pay full stack engineers 210,000. And they pay senior backend engineers $237,000 a year. Wow, that's a lot of money, how pleasing. So yeah, clearly they pay really well. Now this isn't necessarily the easiest company to get into, but with that being said, this is a video about the top 10 highest paying work from home job companies. So for that reason, I'll give this one a 9.5 out of 10 opportunity score. Next, we're gonna talk about CVS health and they're almost always hiring a ton of people and many of them are for remote positions. At the time of looking at it right now, they have over 400 remote positions available. Now, you probably know CVS health. It's on like every corner in any big city in the United States. They focus on healthcare and they offer a wide range of healthcare related services. And they hire for a bunch of different positions, but some of them would be health risk education consultants, customer service representative and sales executives. And customer service representatives, for instance, make about $39,000 a year. So yeah, there's a lot of different options. This is another really good one to look into. I'll give them a 9 out of 10 opportunity score. By the way, if you haven't checked it out already, I did make a video on the 17 work from home job companies that are almost always hiring. And you can check that out by clicking right here.


EndNote Online allows you to organize your references into groups. This makes it easier to locate references for a project and share groups with colleagues. To create a new group, click on the Organize tab and select Manage My Groups. Click on New Group and you'll be prompted to enter a name for the group. Click OK. To add references to the group, click on the My References tab. Tick the box next to the references you want to add to the group. Click on the Add to Group drop down menu and select the group. You can add a single reference to multiple groups. To see which group or groups are given references in, click on the blue folder icon below the reference. To access the group, expand the panel on the left side of the screen and select Under My Groups.


Hi, and welcome to the session. Here is discuss the following question. The question says, use matrices. Solve the following system of equations. x plus 5 plus z is equal to 3, x minus 2 y plus 3 z is equal to 2, and 2x minus 5 plus z is equal to 2. Let's now begin with the solution. Given equations are x plus 5 plus z is equal to 3, x minus 2 y plus 3 z equals to 2, and 2x minus 5 plus z is equal to 2. Now these given equations can be written as equals to b, where a is equal to 3 by 3 matrix in which elements are coefficient of x, y, and z. This is equal to column matrix in which elements are x, y, and z. b is also a column matrix in which elements are 3, 2, 2. Find determinant of a, 1 into determinant of minus 2, 3, minus 1, 1, minus 1 into determinant of 1, 2, 3, 1, plus 1 into determinant of 1, 2, minus 2, minus 1. Now this is equal to 1 into minus 2 plus 3, minus 1 into 1 minus 6, plus 1 into minus 1 plus 4. This is equal to 1 into 1, minus 1 into 5, sorry, minus 5, plus 1 into 3. This is equal to 1 plus 5 plus 3. And this is equal to 9, which is not equal to 0. Determinant of a is not equal to 0, so this implies given system of equations unique solution and system of equations by Grammler's rule. We'll first find d1. d1 is the determinant of elements given on the right-hand side, coefficients of z, and coefficients of 5. So d1 is equal to determinant of minus 1, 1, 3, 1. 3 into minus 2, plus 3, minus 1, into 2, minus 6, plus 1, into minus 2, plus 4. This is equal to 3 into 1, minus 1, into minus 4, plus 1, into 2. This is equal to 3, plus 4, plus 2, and this is equal to d1 is equal to 9. Now we will find determinant of d2. Coefficient of x is equal to 1, into 2, minus 1, into 2, minus 4. And this is equal to minus 4, plus 15, minus 2, and this is equal to 9. Terminant of d3. In this determinant, elements will be coefficient of y is equal to minus 1, 3 is equal to 1, into minus 4, plus 2, minus 1, into 2, minus 4, plus 3, into minus 1, plus 1, into minus 2, plus 3, into 3, plus 2, minus 2, and this is equal to determinant of d1, by determinant of a, y is equal to determinant of d2, by determinant of a, and z is equal to determinant of d3, by determinant of a. Now determinant of d1 is 9, and determinant of a is also 1, and 9 by 9 is equal to 1. Determinant of d2 is also equal to 9, and determinant of a is also equal to 9. So y is also equal to 1. Determinant of d3 is equal to 9, and determinant of a is also equal to 9, 9 by 9 is equal to 1. So it equals to 1, y equals to 1, and z equals to 1 is the required solution of the given equation. So this completes the session. Bye and take care.


Let us do certain problems on the steam reformation, we will start with very basic problems to just get a background about we will just brush up certain concepts which we have studied long back and then we will later on we will move on to increase the complexity of the problem. So let us look at the first problem, this is a very simple problem wherein it is asked to calculate the bond energy change in a steam methane reforming reaction and the bond energy of various bonds is given in the problem. So how to solve that? Let us first look at the steam reformation reaction, so we know that methane it reacts with steam which is H2O and then it forms syngas which is nothing but carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Now if we look at this reaction which is the SMR reaction how can we find the change in the bond energy? So bond energy change can be obtained by finding the difference in the bond energy on the reactant side and that on the product side. So if we look at the bonds on the reactant side which are broken. Let us look at the bonds which are broken in the process then these are CH bonds 4 CH bonds are broken and 2 OH bonds are broken. So the associated average bond energy which is in kilojoule per mole can be written as the bond energy for CH bond is 413 kilojoule per mole. And for OH bond 2 bonds such bonds are broken from the reactant side and the associated bond energy for OH bond is 467 kilojoule per mole and which corresponds to 1652 kilojoule per mole and 934 kilojoule per mole a total of 2586 kilojoule per mole for the reactants. Now let us look at the product side. The products on the product side bonds are formed which bonds are formed CO is formed carbon monoxide which is a triple bond. So one CO mole, one mole of CO is being formed in the process so the associated bond energy we have seen is 1072 kilojoule per mole and 3 moles of hydrogen is being formed. The associated bond energy for hydrogen is 436 kilojoule per mole 3 such bonds are being formed which corresponds to total energy of 2380 kilojoule per mole for the product side. So if you want to find the change in energy in the process, the energy associated with bonds being broken the total we have found 2586 and the energy associated with the bonds being formed in the product side 2380 and that is equal to 206 kilojoule per mole. Now if we remember this was the value we have seen in the SMR reaction and this is corresponding to the energy change. Since this is positive in sign that means it is an endothermic reaction of SMR reaction is an endothermic reaction and energy is required in the process. So this is a very simple problem which we have seen. Let us look at another problem. This is again very simple problem which states that after the steam methane reforming the gas which is obtained product gas which is obtained after reforming process called reformed gas has the composition which is shown in the table. This is on the dry basis so removing the moisture content and this is given by the component wise in the mole percent and we need to find out the partial pressure of each component of the sin gas provided that the outlet pressure the total pressure is 15 bar in the process. Now let us solve this problem this is again a simple problem how to solve it let us see. Now we know that Dalton's law which is actually for ideal gas but can be applied for hydrogen because the temperature of the reaction in SMR which we are considering is very high 900, 950 or 700 to 950 degree centigrade and under that conditions we can still apply the Dalton's law which says that the partial pressure is equal to the mole fraction and the total pressure. So what is P i? P i is partial pressure of any species which is reacting say i and the corresponding mole fraction of that species is represented by Y i, P is the total pressure which is given in the problem. So let us do that now the partial pressure of hydrogen can be obtained as the mole fraction of hydrogen and the total pressure the given that the mole fraction of hydrogen in the problem is 0.6791 it was the mole percent now we have converted it into 15 bar which is nothing but 1500 kilo Pascal and that gives a value of 1018.65 kilo Pascal. So this is the partial pressure of hydrogen which we have got similarly we can find for other species which is methane again the mole fraction into the total pressure for methane given that the mole fraction is 0.0197 total pressure 1500 kilo Pascal and that gives a value of 29.55 kilo Pascal. Total pressure of carbon dioxide also we can get in the similar manner it is mole fraction times the total pressure given that the mole fraction is 0.0965 into 1500 kilo Pascal which gives a value of 144.75 kilo Pascal and same way we can find out for the last species that is the CO in the problem it is mole fraction and the total pressure given that the mole fraction is 2047 into 1500 kilo Pascal and that makes it 307.05 kilo Pascal so it is very simple. We are trying to build up the foundation to do the problems on the reforming reaction. Let us look at another problem which states that if 1 kg of methane it reacts with steam producing syngas so carbon monoxide and hydrogen and that undergoes the reaction. Let us assume that there is a complete conversion of methane which occurs so the problem is how much amount of hydrogen will be produced in the process. So this can be done considering we know that if we look at this process if you look at the molar mass so 16 gram per mole for CH4 and that is producing 1 mole of methane is producing 3 moles of hydrogen so 2 gram per mole for hydrogen so if we look at 1 kg of methane being used in the process that is equivalent to say 62.5 moles of methane which is going to produce 3 moles of now these 62.5 moles of methane produces in fact 3 times hydrogen which is equivalent to 187.5 moles of hydrogen there can be several ways of doing this and that if converted using the molar mass will give us the amount of hydrogen which is being produced is 375 grams of hydrogen being produced in the process. So this way we can do very simple small calculations. Now let us consider problem number 4 here this is the next step of SMR that is after reforming which is water gas shift where in carbon monoxide again reacts with 1 mole of steam to produce carbon dioxide and more amount of hydrogen. So this process we remember is water gas shift reaction also known as carbon monoxide shift reaction. Now let us assume the problem states that if 1 mole of CO reacts with 2 moles of water steam and these are fed in the reaction such that the reaction comes to equilibrium at 1000 Kelvin and it is given that under these reaction condition the equilibrium constant is 1. So what we need to do is we have to calculate the equilibrium composition which is obtained for the product gas and what is the fractional conversion of the limiting reactant in the process. Now let us consider any general equation let us say 2 reactants which are reacting to produce 2 products which are say AB are the reactants and they are reacting to produce products C and D. Let us say this is a sort of reversible reaction like the reforming or the water gas shift reaction. Now the equilibrium constant we know this is given by their mole fraction ratio of the product to that of the reactants. So these are, so Y is nothing but the mole fraction for species let us say I. Now let us look at the reaction wherein CO reacting with H2O giving us CO2 plus H2. Now if we look at the input side given that 1 mole of CO reacts with 2 moles of H2O. 1 mole of CO reacts with 2 mole of H2O. So at the input side it is the 2 or 0 however at the output side since this is it will depend upon the equilibrium certain amount of unreacted CO could be there that can be represented by 1 minus X. Similarly certain amount of steam could be left out so 2 minus X and the amount of CO2 formed on the product side let us say it is X and H2O is also X. Now these are 3 moles so if we look at the total number of moles then this is this can add up to give us 3. So we can also find out the mole fraction from here. So mole fraction is the moles which we have found in the output side divided by the total number of moles. So 1 minus X by 3, 2 minus X by 3, X by 3 and X by 3. Now let us use these mole fractions in the equilibrium constant equation to find out the product gas composition. Now using that we can substitute in the equation for Kc and we find that X into X in the numerator and 1 minus X into 2 minus X in the denominator. So that is X square over 1 minus X and 2 minus X. It is already given in the problem that this value is equal to 1. So what we will do is now we will solve this quadratic equation X square upon 1 minus X into 2 minus X equal to 1 and if we solve this equation solving this equation we get the value of X and that comes out to be 0.667. Now if we use this value of 0.667 into the table that we have made so here in we can get the values of the CO, H2O, CO2 and H2 in the output side. So if we substitute that and find out the mole fraction.  If we just look back for CO it is mole fraction is 1 minus X upon 3. Let us substitute that and on substituting we get a value of 0.111. Same way we can find out the mole fraction for the rest of the species like for H2O this is 0.444 for CO2 that is 0.222 for hydrogen this is again 0.222. One more thing is asked in the problem and that is fractional conversion of limiting the reactant. Now if we looked at the values we can see that easily identify here that the limiting reactant is CO. So the fractional conversion of limiting reactant can simply be written as which is CO in this case we know that the fractional axis could be the number of moles fed minus the number of moles corresponding to the stoichiometric amount divided by the number of moles corresponding to the stoichiometric amount. So if we try to find out that at equilibrium we know that the number of moles for CO is 1 minus X. So fractional it could be given by 1 minus 0.333 divided by 1 and that is again 0.667 the same value as X and we can find out the percentage also by multiplying it by 100. So that comes out to be so when we multiply it convert into fractional percentage it comes out to be 66.7 percent. Now let us look at one more problem which is on steam methane reforming and it is stated that consider the steam methane reforming reaction the temperature is given as 900 degrees centigrade equilibrium constant as 1 and it is mentioned that let us assume that 1 mole of methane and 1 mole of steam they react together and the reaction it comes at equilibrium to equilibrium at 900 degree centigrade. So we have to again calculate the equilibrium composition. Now we know that the steam methane reforming is so if we again write down the in and out species 1 mole given methane reacting with 1 mole of steam so at input side these 2 were 0. Now what is remaining at the output is 1 minus X and 1 minus X such that X moles of CO and 3X of hydrogen is being found. Now if we sum total this then the total of this comes out to be of 1 minus X, 1 minus X, X and 3X that comes out to be 2 plus 2X. This will be used for finding out the mole fraction. So the mole fraction represented by Yi for the species I we can find out from here by dividing the individual composition by the total.  Now we will be using that in the equilibrium constant to find out the value of X for this equation. So if we quickly write down these equation in the formula for equilibrium constant the product side is CO and H2. So we know that the product if it is Yc, Yd over the reactant if the reaction is of the form A B, A plus B giving C plus D then this is the equilibrium constant. So let us write down this Kc for the problem. So it comes out to be it is X upon 1 plus X this is for CO for hydrogen. Similarly we can write as 3X upon 2 times X plus 1 and this goes to stoichiometry coefficient because 3 moles of hydrogen are being considered.  So we will be solving this problem and that gives us a value of 27 by 4 solving this X to the power 4 upon 1 plus X square 1 minus X square and that is given in the problem is equal to 1 and this can be made further simplified by writing X square upon 1 minus X square whole square and that is equal to 4 by 27 that comes out to be somewhere 0.148. We can further solve this to get the value of X and the X on solving comes out to be 0.527. Now this can be further used to find out the product gas composition for the individual species involved. So again writing back in terms of the mole fraction we will be finding out the mole fractions now by substituting in the table. So in the table if we see mole fraction is given by for methane it is 1 minus X upon 2 plus 2 X for hydrogen it is 1 minus X upon 2 plus 2 X similarly for CO and for hydrogen. So substituting the value of X we can find out the mole fraction and that comes out to be for methane it is 0.155 the higher digits are being rounded off 0.173 and 0.518. So these are the corresponding equilibrium compositions which we can get. We can find out the number of moles also by substituting in the same equation. So if we want to write in terms of moles it comes out to be 0.478, 0.4728, number of moles 0.4728 same for this 0.5272 and 1.5816. So this is how we can calculate the find out the equilibrium composition for either a water gas shift reaction or for a steam methane reforming reaction. So these are some of the problems simple problems that we have solved related to the steam methane reforming. Thank you.


Introducing the M2M MQ03-LTE-FIRE, a low-cost solution for dual-path LTE and internet fire alarm monitoring. Easy to install, with minimal connections going back to the system itself. InterTech approved and listed. This device is a dial-capture interface supporting contact ID and SIA CO reporting formats. With reporting times as low as 20 seconds, this device is supported on panels such as FireLite, Silent Night, Notifier, Honeywell, Potter, and any other fire panel that supports contact ID or CO reporting formats. A small compact design with a magnetic antenna for easy mounting. This device requires 12 to 29 volts DC of power and it consumes 50 milliamps on standby with a peak of 200 milliamps. Its dimensions are 2.48 inches by 3.54 inches by 1.26 inches making this an extremely discreet device. Its weight is 2.56 ounces without the antenna and this device will operate at temperatures between 32 degrees Fahrenheit all the way to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Please verify that this product is compliant with your local AHA as policies vary by jurisdiction. Ladies and gentlemen, the MQ03-LTE-FIRE by M2M. Where you can view valuable links pertaining to this product, similar how-to videos, and our low-cost, no-contract alarm monitoring services.


Welcome to Toffey TV, it is the instant match reaction, Fulham nil, Everton nil, a pretty dreadful, well dreadful second half, it was a dreadful second half, I thought Everton started the game okay, I thought we came out okay, had some chances, I think Dominic Carver-Lewin missed a really decent chance when Gray got the ball over to him from wide areas and I can get first half, it was a pretty even contest, they probably think they should have had the lead but I think we probably should have had it as well. Second half, very very poor, I don't really know what happened to a second half, I think we just sort of retreated, we couldn't string two passes together, we kept on losing it in the midfield, they had loads of energy, they had loads of the ball getting wide, I mean their tactical day was getting it wide and getting into the box and basically the overload of this on both sides. I thought Michalenko dealt with that really really well, I don't think Sheamus Coleman dealt with it as well and also the players in Fulton matter do their job and I don't think they did. Second half, I think we were very very lucky, they had 10 shots off target in the entire game, 6 shots on target, they had more at a possession, by the way I do not care if Liverpool are getting beaten so please just stop on in the comments, I couldn't care less. I think the game for me, I mean it didn't swing on it but a big massive moment in the game was the non red card for Mitrovich, I thought it was absolutely shocking, I thought it was an absolutely shocking stamp, I'm not a stamp because I don't think he intended to stamp, but a shockingly late tackle and I think that to me should be a red card. In the Premier League these days, if you're late and you stand on someone's ankle, it should be a red card and I think moments like that are so important in games like that because people can say well you know make sure they've had a penalty or whatever but they're 50-50 moments for me, that's not a 50-50 moment, that is a blatant red card as far as I'm concerned. I've seen them given in other games and if they've been given in other games then they should be given in every game. If you come in late and you stamp on someone's ankle effectively then it should be a red card, it really should. And 10 faces 11, we win that game of football, no issues and you know whether we deserve to win it is a different thing. For me it's a blatant red card, people might say well it's not a red but it is a red because whether you're late and you miss the ball by that much and you stamp on someone's ankle then it's a red card and it doesn't matter whether it looks worse, it doesn't matter in slow motion, it doesn't matter. The game nowadays is about protecting players and for me that is just a clear red card, an absolute clear red card and that you know Mitterwitch if you get sent off there that changes the game completely and I think we go on and win it but that's not the reason why we were poor in the second half. As I said first half was quite even, I think Cavaloon should score really from Grace Cross but second half we had absolutely nothing, we played on the counter attack and Gordon and Gray were really really poor, really poor. They're supposed to be at our ball and neither of them did anything, I'm amazed again like Newcastle that Andy Gordon managed to stay on the pitch, I'm absolutely amazed by that. Sorry, stayed on the pitch before Gray, I know he went off late on from Al Pai but I was absolutely amazed by that, that Gordon was taken off and he was kept on the pitch. We need more and Gordon and Gray were absolutely abysmal second half, that put more pressure on the midfield cos those three then had to start, two of them had to start coming wide. O'nana was on a booking as well, he obviously decided to take Garner off and brought James Garner on, I think it was right to take some more off in the subs, maybe I would have took O'nana off and I know he probably kept them on cos of his height but maybe if they were the same height I would have took O'nana off because I think again, I think he did what he did at Newcastle at times which was slowed the game down and allowed full on players to get on top of them. I think they had a lot of energy in the midfield, hell of a lot of energy in midfield, they were breaking down our play and whoa we were pretty much anonymous in the game as well. And it just goes to show two weeks the difference between the games last week loads of energy obviously playing on the front foot playing at home but it really shouldn't be a difference whether you're playing at home or playing away. If you've got a style of play you should be able to stick to it and this is often the downfall of Everton managers actually, is not being able to get the way they play at home away. I think what Frank's got going for him is the atmosphere is so good at home and it's not a guaranteed win by any means playing at Gooderson Park but the atmosphere is a hell of a lot better playing at Gooderson Park now than it was for Benita's. And funny enough this is what Marko Silver struggled with as well when he was at Everton is the fact that he couldn't balance those two things. The end of Marko Silver's first season he was absolutely fantastic at home, we beat the likes of Manchester United 4-0 but then we went to Fulham and we got B2-0 and we went to Crystal Palace and drew 0-0 late towards the end of the season which sort of meant there was not a chance we were going to get European football. When we had a little outside chance of it and this is what Frank is struggling with as well. The away form is very, very poor when you think about it. We had one win this season, Southampton I think he won one last season against Leicester so the away form really is the Achilles heel for a lot of Everton managers. You've got to find a way, if you have to change the way you play you've got to find a way to teach you and if that means not playing with two-and-out wingers then that means playing without two-and-out wingers maybe Dwight McNeill would be better for away games because the way he plays isn't based on pace it's based on and I know that's counterproductive because we're trying to counterattack but the two players are so poor at keeping hold of the ball that they don't give you an opportunity to counterattack. I mean at one point in the second half there we had a four-on-four I think and Gordon had the ball and he just gave it straight back to the opposition in the box. So maybe we have to come up with a different way when we play away to come up with the points. Don't get me wrong I am absolutely delighted we've got a point out of this game in the end of it. Absolutely delighted with it because we didn't really deserve a point. Fullham missed a hell of a lot of chances in the game and our defenders had to be on it. I thought once again Tarkowski played well. I think Michael Encoe was probably man of the match the amount of blocks he made for crosses because ultimately their threat was the crosses. It was getting the ball in the box for Mitterwit. You obviously love pulling on to the full back which we've seen that today pulled off Tarkowski and pulled on to the back of Conocoe in front of Seamus Coleman. That's what he loves doing so we have to stop the cross. I mean obviously Dominic Harvan-Lewin was again isolated again. Again it's only his second start. It's going to be difficult for him. I thought he looked on it early on. He had a great opportunity early on and pulled it back. It wasn't a brilliant pull back but he did okay. He tied second half I think. Again playing more as a lowman this week. Not having players up with them. It makes the job harder. So maybe this is something we have to look at. Maybe we have to change the way we play away from home. If we can't play 4-3-3 then maybe we have to look at something a little bit different. Maybe we play more of a diamond or maybe we play trying to get James Garnan into the team. What we missed today was actually just keeping hold of the ball. We just couldn't keep hold of the ball enough to work ourselves into the game. So that's something we really might have to look at for the away games. I certainly don't think it's working with Gray and Anthony Gordon who are very very poor in the second half. Because you just don't work hard enough. You don't get back enough. And obviously today with having the way they played the overload it just didn't work. So maybe that's something we have to look at going forward. Is that too much of a luxury? Having two players. Two wide players you don't offer you enough. Like last week for Palace they had three attacking players and two to me they had five. But they couldn't get the ball. So it's very easy in midfield with more ends in midfield. We outnumbered them. So just the same today in a different way is that if we can't get the ball to Gray and to Gordon or when they get the ball they just waste it. Then what are we doing? We're not creating opportunities. I mean we didn't create anything in that second half. Dominic Arvillian was offside but he was having to play on the shoulder. I mean I know he was offside a couple of times but he's waiting for the pass to come through. He has to do better today. Of course he has to do better in every opportunity but there's no support for him at all. There wasn't any support for him at all. And no one was breaking with the ball. Wobby just didn't pick the ball up and run with it or find the pass. So it was a really difficult second half. As I said first half I thought we were fine in the first half. I really did. I thought we had plenty of the ball. It was a game of two and a throw. The whole of that. The whole of the first half. Second half we didn't do a tap and obviously we had to rely massively and obviously then on the defenders and then it becomes about the subs then. And again we really didn't have the subs. Obviously Malpie came on for Gordon. That's not going to help you. You're not playing the same way then. I probably would have started Patterson as well but listen the manager knows the fitness of the fella. I thought when Patterson came on we dealt a little bit better with their wide men. Not completely better by the way. He did get Adolf a couple of times but again he's someone who's been out for a few weeks and has come back into the game. But I think maybe for the away games we do look at starting like Neil and maybe you've got then one wide man on the left hand side whose job it is to just get crosses in and on the other side you've got a bit more pace. I just don't think it works away from home with Gordon and Grey. I know we've had moments this season where we have played on the counter attack but I don't think consistently it works at all and as I said Gordon and Grey were really really poor second half. For me again it's not about keeping old of the ball. It's about taking it down the left hand side and maybe getting an end product. And today we just didn't have an end product. It wasn't the greatest performance at all. There you go. I'll take a point all day long. Whether we deserve the point is a different thing but you don't always deserve what you get. We've been on the other end haven't we? But again that's one of those games where you might look at it and go. Well today last season we probably would have got beat. This season we're taking a point and that shows the defence then doesn't it. That shows there's a lot more going for us at the back. There you go. Make sure I'm hoping to get some videos from Baz who was at the game. He sent me one at a time saying you should have been five in a love. So I'm hoping to get some videos from Baz that I can edit and put together. I'll be back to do my player ratings soon so make sure you check that out. There you go. Thanks for watching. I'll see you in a bit.


Aaron Joe Gallo said on the field that it's been a little bit of a rough week and kind of jokes It's about time in reference to the home run Just what could a night like this do for a newcomer to allow them to settle in a little bit Well big night for him, but the way I look at it is he's been having good at bats every night The defense has been there. You're seeing the athleticism. He's grinding at bats So for me it was kind of a matter of time where he really broke through and obviously hit one out of the park and a huge one that that But I Mean, I think he's I think he's looked very very good in the first week, frankly Little little nervous there I did feel like he he kind of topped it or kind of topspin hooked it But still, you know, I knew he you know He looked like he was looking for that pitch and put a pretty good swing on it I Thought that was going to be the result, but it definitely threw a scare into us Why do you think Arald has struggled so much with his fastball tonight? Not sure. We'll have to have to look at it Yeah, not sure, you know, you know, I think a slip out there He's out of that inning a little cleaner But a little bit of a struggle a little bit of a grind for him as they worked a lot along at bats He made some big pitches when he had to to get back in some counts So we'll have to look at it Did you consider it worked out obviously, but did you consider bringing in little wise together in that situation? I probably would have one more hitter if You know, if he had if he had gone past Tanager there, then that I probably would have gone to low And just looking at how that inning unfolded. How big was that scoop by Anthony Rizzo to start off the inning to get the First out of the yeah, it was really really good play, you know, rookie Got a got a pretty good throw off But was a little slow to get to the ball and and and Riz dug it out, you know, like like like he's been doing all week or For the last decade, I guess Tom Merriam, please unmute Aaron you're now six and one since the trading deadline. Do you feel that the deals help re-energize the team in addition to the new talents you received? I do you know, I feel like guys are playing really well We've obviously added really good players that have that have come in and been key contributors You know, and I think it's a continuation of Frankly how we've been playing now for the better part of a month where we've we've mixed in some really tough losses But but have managed to play pretty good baseball against a lot of good teams as well. So We got to keep it up though. That's a good team. We're playing over there. Nice to get the first one But we have another important one tomorrow Ryan done leave you in the next question Talked about Chapman tonight, but the last seven save opportunities he's seven for seven I think he's led one run in his last eight innings and Britain was clean tonight I mean with Britain on the aisle so much and Chapman's tough months You haven't had a lot of nights where you could just go to the blueprint of Britain eight Chapman nine Clothes at a late rally is you starting to feel confident in that again. Yeah. Yeah Chappy's been going well now for a month Brit Brits been getting a little bit of tough luck He almost again tonight, you know, they had a little squibber down the line against them for the double He gets a strike out and then they hit another number down the third baseline and all of a sudden He's in a first to third scenario, but again with Brit He's always that one pitch away and he puts the next guy on the ground and turns a nice double play So yeah, nice nice to have those two guys, you know in that eighth ninth close it out And you know, obviously, you know those guys are really important to what we do Greg Joyce you have the next question Aaron did you did you think that was gonna be a home or off the bat for Gallo or you have to wait a little bit? Just given how high it went I thought it had it. I definitely thought it had a chance. I knew it was right down the line, which is a good thing Obviously it was so high. You don't see very many that go that high and so I definitely thought I actually got Up out of the dugout because I felt like it was gonna go and it just kept kept going and and hit it obviously in the perfect spot Do you remember any hit that high here? Man, I'm I don't I don't know that was that was that was up there Go next to Eric Boland Aaron before Gallo's home red seawall that retired the first two of the inning How important were Aaron's and that John Carlos at bats preceding Gallo? I mean seawall. It's tough And really tough on right. He's there and you know I think judgy was o2 worked his way back into the count put a good swing on one to get it going John Carlo, you know works a deep count Fights went off and shoots it the other way to set the table in what were two really good at bats against a good reliever and You know that that set up Joey nice But yeah, those were those were two really good at bat really good two-strike at bats And then Meredith asked you about the scoop that that Rizzo mates just generally speaking it as infielders. How Significant is it to know that every throw to first doesn't have to necessarily be perfect? Yeah, I think it's I think it's comforting No, and you got you know Someone that's really elite at that, you know and and Riz has told them just Get it to me. I'll catch it. So Yeah, I think there's there's definitely some comfort that comes with that Thank you Christie Eckard, please unmute Erin do you have a starter for tomorrow night? I'm gonna we're gonna go talk about it right now and see what see how we can lay it out and So I have a little bit in my mind right now, but I haven't told him where I want you know, I want to talk to Maddie and Hark about it. We'll we'll Let you know here shortly