Okay, so let's start to welcome everyone to the Schubert seminar. Today, we're happy to have Nikola Peran from Mekalpolitechnik telling us about the positivity of Grasmani and Quantum K theory. Please go ahead, Nikola. Thanks, Leonardo. Thanks to the organizers for the invitation. I'm happy to be in this Schubert seminar. So I will report on joint work with two organizers of the seminar. So maybe this is the reason for my invitation. I don't know. So and also with Pierre-Manuel Chappu, who is in Nancy. So I'm going to focus on Grasmanians, but this applies to some other cases. I will explain this. So, okay, let's see. Yes, so I will start with the basic Schubert calculus for at least for illustrating the fact that this is a Schubert seminar. And then I will focus on, so I will, the Schubert calculus will be will be a bit large. So I will include quantum cohomology in Schubert calculus. And then I will focus on quantum K theory, then state the results. And maybe I don't know exactly give ideas of proof. I don't know where I can, where I can go. Okay, so I start with really basics. So I was told to start with basics. So let's see. So the main character is a is a rational projective homogeneous space. So a quotient of a reductive group by a parabolic subgroup. Okay, so the you have, you have the usual, the usual characters in this, in this topic where you fix a parabolic subgroup. Okay, then you fix a Borel subgroup inside your parabolic subgroup.  And you can also look at the opposite Borel subgroup, which is unique Borel subgroup. So that the intersection of your Borel with opposite is maximal torus. And with these subgroups, you can, you can produce lots of combinatorial gadgets. I am going to recall and that most of you already know. Okay, so the basic example is to, to look at GLN. And then you have the Borel subgroup, which is given, for example, by upper triangular matrices, maximal torus by diagonal matrices. And the opposite subgroup will be given by lower triangular matrices. And once you have such a Borel subgroup or opposite Borel subgroup, you can look at the Borel decomposition, which is simply the decomposition in terms of p orbits or the decomposition in terms of p minus orbits. These two are conjugates. So some of them are, they are the same up to conjugation. And you get just a discharge union of finitely many p orbits. So you have only finitely many and they are indexed by some subsets, some nice subset of the variable. Okay, so I guess, I guess this is, this is well known to everyone. Okay, once you have all these gadgets, well, you, you can do a bit of geometry and go to, to cohomology.  These are the Schubert varieties. If you take the closure of the opposite orbits, then you get the opposite Schubert varieties. So they have nice properties. For example, the dimension of the Schubert varieties, the length of the corresponding variable element. And this is also the co-dimension of the opposite Schubert variety. Okay, so this is very classical. And the main point in, in looking at Schubert varieties and opposite Schubert varieties is not only on, on co-dimension and nice combinatorics, the fact that these are like canonical choices of sub varieties in general position. But this is something, then something very convenient because you have like these varieties which are almost fixed, but still they like represent something which are in general position. And therefore any intersection theory will be very nice using these sub varieties. Okay, so I will, I will, I will present several avatars of, of intersection. So cohomology, I will not talk about equivalent cohomology, but they are also very convenient for equivalent cohomology. But okay, so let's start with the basics. Co-homology, so once you have these varieties which are per-person varieties in, in the homogeneous space, you can look at their Schubert classes, which are simply the cohomology classes and the Schubert classes form bases and actually form dual bases for the cohomology. So, so actually these two bases, that's what I'm explaining right after, is that these two bases are actually the same. It's just that you have a parametrization of, of the indexes. So you can just do some bijection on indexes to get the classes of Schubert varieties and then the classes of opposite Schubert varieties. Okay, and, and they have, they are in duality for, for intersection. So this is called Poincaré duality. And as, as is explained below, if you look at the opposite Schubert variety, actually the opposite Schubert variety is nothing else than the translate of a Schubert variety for, of the dual Schubert variety. And, and these W zeros somehow explain the fact that they are in general position. So you have to translate by the general element. Okay, so this, this is classical Schubert calculus and using this you can compute lots of things on co-moral G and intersection products. So you can define, especially, at least compute the cup product in terms of these Schubert classes. So yeah, I expressed the cup product in terms of opposite Schubert classes, but as we have seen, this is the same as with Schubert classes. It's just better for, for the degree reasons. Okay, so if you multiply any two Schubert classes, you get an expression in terms of Schubert classes because these are, these form a basis and you can expand them with, with coefficients. And these coefficients are actually solution of enumerative, geometric enumerative problems. So they count the number of intersection points of the translate of three Schubert varieties in general position. So you, you pick your first opposite Schubert variety, you pick a general translate of the second opposite Schubert variety. And then for the last one, because you have quantum ideality, you have to take a general translate of the dual class of Schubert variety. Okay, so, so in particular, what you get is that these numbers are always non-negative integers. So, so a very classical problem and difficult problem and, and some people in the audience claim that this is like a non-really possible to have a nice expression to this problem is to give a combinatorial enumerative formula for all these now, these intersection numbers. So in general, yeah, I'm not only restricting to the case of Grasmagnans, for which we have nice solutions for these numbers. Okay, so this was Schubert calculus, classical Schubert calculus. And now I want to, to go into some avatars of Schubert calculus. So I go in two directions. There will be two directions. There's a quantum direction, which I'm going to talk right now. And then there is a k theory direction. And I'm going to talk about a bit later. Okay, so, so to do quantum Comodji, what you do is instead of doing intersection on the variety, you do intersection on families of curves. So the moduli space of curves. Or if you want to, to see this as an enumerative problem, you, you are not counting points on the variety anymore, but you are counting rational curves joining points in the variety. Okay, so you fix an effective curve class D. You can think about D as a degree.  And you look at the moduli space of stable maps. So this conservation moduli space of stable maps. So as a set, it's just the set of all morphisms from a curve of students zero, which is only, which has only nodes as singularities. So it's just a tree of P ones with some mark points P one to P N, which are just smooth mark points and the morphism from C to X. And the only thing you want to, to fix is the class, the commodity class of the push forward of your, of your curve, which should be D. Okay. So this represents the curve or you can, you can, you can think of the, the concept of moduli spaces as a family of, of spaces are very big space with lots of irreducible components. Okay. So in the case of, okay. And you have, and you have, you need to, to ask that F satisfies the stability condition. So the stability condition is, is simply that there is no, what there are finally many automorphism for your map. Or if you want for rational, for, for stable maps of general zero, this is just that when some irreducible component of C is contracted by the map F, then there must be at least three mark points or three, or three singular points of the curve. Okay. So, so this moduli space is very nice for several reasons. So the first reason is that there are lots and lots of maps from this moduli space to other spaces. So the, at least there would be, there would be three that I will, I will really need, which are more than three because I have end points, but the, the evaluation maps. So each time you have, each time you choose a fixed point, then you can map the, the stable map to its value at that fixed point. So you get lots of map to X. Okay. So this will be used to, to pull back classes from X to the moduli space. And you also have lots of sub varieties in this moduli space, which are very nice, which are given by curves, which have reduced source. I will talk about them a bit later on. And for X, so this is defined for any projective, smooth projective variety or any, even probably any variety, but, but for, for X rational homogeneous space, this space is, is very nice, this space of stable maps. So at least for us, it is, it is irreducible. It is even rational and it has nice singularities. So it has rational singularities. Actually it has, it has quotient singularities. So this, this is almost a smooth, smooth variety and rational, so very, very, very, very positive. Well, lots of geometry in it. Okay. So we want to use this moduli space to define a new product, which is a deformation of the homology product. So first you, well, because it's a deformation, you need to, to extend a bit the space on which you're going to, to do the product. So the space is just to take, you take the homology of, of the variety and you tensor it with some, some, okay, let's say some Laurent series or the power series of the integers. Actually we don't really need the power series here. We, we will only need the polynomials, but for the moment, let's, let's just define it this way. So yeah, I assume pica rank one, but it's not really important. You can, you can view q as a, as several variables and then, and then definition works for, for any homogeneous rational projective space. Okay. So this is just a space. It's just a tensor product. And you define the, you define a product on this, on this vector space or on this z module as follows. So it's going to be the deformation of the classical homology product to you define, you define the product on, on, on a basis. So you choose two true bad basis, which are here opposite true bad basis. And you pull them back to the modular space using the evaluation maps. Okay. You multiply these two bases on the modular space and then you push forward. Okay. When you do that, obviously this depends on the modular space you chose. So what you do is you choose all the possible modular spaces. So you, you are summing over all the effective classes of curves. So all these D and to remember the fact that you are summing on all these days, you add this quantum parameter, which depends on D. So all these quantum parameters will depend on the effective class. So if you have, if you have pica rank one, you just have one variable. If you have higher pica rank, you have more variables. And then you decompose the power in terms of, of these different generators of pica pool. Okay. So this is the product. And so one of the main result of the series, the fact that this product is, is very nice. So especially it is associated because this is absolutely not obvious from this definition. And then the fact that it's commutative and graded is, is not difficult. You need to, to give the right grading to, to the quantum parameter, but then the commutativity just follows from the commutativity of the, of the product on the modular space. Okay. So this is, this is quantum chronology. And it's easy to see that this quantum chronology, the deformation of chronology, because when you take the modular space of curves of degree zero, this is just the space X itself. And these evaluation maps are just identity maps. And so what you get is just the cup product that you push forward. So it's just a cup product without, without curves. So you are, you are getting back the cup product for q equals zero. And it is a deformation of the, of the, the chronology. Okay. So this is a mark on the fact that you don't really need to have power series here. So if you have a final variety, the, the dimension of the modular space is going to be, is going to be linear on the degree. So, so if you, if you take a degree large enough, then the modular space is so big that the, the interest is a cup product is of too large dimension. And then the push forward will be of a variety of dimensions strictly bigger than the variety X. So the push forward in chronology is going to vanish. And therefore the, the term will be zero for the large enough. For non-final varieties, you, you need to, to do, to be more careful on, on convergence. Okay. So again, when you, you have this quantum chronology, you can look at the, at the stricter constant of the product. And this stricter constant of the product are very nice enumerative geometric properties. So if you, if you look at degree zero, then you get back comologies. So you get back the numbers we were talking before, and which are counting points in intersection points of three shubard varieties. And if you go in higher degrees, and what's happening is that the same kind of techniques using Kline-Mann's versatility imply that these numbers are actually just counting the number of rational curve having geometric properties. Okay. So what, what do you have? You look at the, the set. They're just, you can, you can do this just as a set. The set of all maps from, you can even assume that the source of the map is, is irreducible. So the set of all maps from P1 to your variety, such that the first mark point, which will be zero in P1, is mapped in a given opposite shubard variety. The second mark point, which you choose to be one, is mapped to a general translate of the second shubard variety. And then the last mark point, you map it to the, again, the Poincaré dual of, of the third shubard variety. Okay. So you have this set of, just a set of maps. And if this set is infinite, then actually, because you are doing push forward in comology, you just get that this coefficient is zero. And if it's not infinite, then the number of maps is exactly the coefficient you're looking for. So, so these coefficients are really enumerative. They're really counting curves. And in particular, these coefficients have to be non-negative integers. Okay. So again, you get, you get, you get non-negativity or positivity in quantum comology. Okay. So I, I prepared a small example. This is a three-dimensional quadratic. Okay. So this is the homogeneous space for the symplectic group or for the orthogonal group, depending the one you prefer. Okay. And the shubard varieties in, in the symplectic, in, in, in the three-dimensional quadratic are just given by, okay. The old variety acts itself. Then in, in minimal dimension, you have just a point. Then in co-dimension one, you have the orthogonal of that point. So the orthogonal of that point, this is for example, the set of all lines passing through that point. Or if you want, it is also the orthogonal of that point. Or if you want to view this geometrically, it is a tangent space passing through the, at that point of the three-dimensional quadratic. So it's a two-dimensional cone over a, a conic. Okay. So this is a, again, a shubard variety. And the last one is just a line, which is for example, passing through the point x. So these, there are just four shubard varieties in this situation. Very simple. And, and if you want to, so I, I, I, I'm, I'm going to do two basic computation in quantum comology and in comology. So the first one is just to take two hyperplane sections in your, in your quadrics. So two, two-dimensional quadrics.  You intersect with two hyperplanes. So you get a, a, a conic in dimension one. Okay. So this conic in dimension one in comology, this is just twice a line. So that's what you get here. And I'm claiming that there is nothing in quantum comology more than in comology. So there are no q terms. And this is because if you take a general point in the quadric and you look, for example, if you start to look for, for, if you, if you're counting curves, you start to count lines. And if you pick a general point in the quadric and you count how many lines are passing through this point and meet the two hyperplanes, then actually any line passing through the point are going to meet the two hyperplanes, whatever the hyperplanes are, just because it's called dimension one. Okay. So the, the, the number of such lines is, this is the number of lines passing through a point, but the number of lines passing through a point, as I was saying, this is exactly a one dimensional variety because it's given by the, the ruling of the, the cone, the quadratic cone, which is a tangent space to the point in the quadric. So there are infinitely many such lines. So there are always infinitely many lines or curve of degree D passing through these two hyperplanes and something. And therefore all the quantum parameters, all the, all the quantum converging product will be zero. So there is nothing really interesting in this situation. But if you go in co-dimension one more, then you look at a line and an hyperplane in that quadric. Then, then, okay, the intersection is very easy. It's just intersection of an hyperplane and a line. This is one point. So this is a homology class, a homology product. But if you look for lines passing through a general point, no. The lines passing through a general point, they are just, they just cover the, the, also going to have that point. The also going to have that point is going to meet the line you chose in exactly one point. So this fix a line, and this line is going to meet the hyperplane in one more point. So it's exactly one line, which meets a general point, the line and the hyperplane. So that's the coefficient one, which appears here. And since you have to take the point-care ideal, the dual to the point is a unit, and you get this quantum parameter. So this is, this is the way you, you can do it. This is just doing geometry and counting. So of course, when you go to higher dimension and more complicated varieties, this is more, more difficult. But in principle, you can just count rational curves. Okay. So, okay, I go on with a quantum k theory. I don't know when I can do a break. So I could do a break now. Or I go on with definition and result of quantum k theory, and then I do the break before results and idea of proof. We can do a break now. It's almost half essentially. So let's have five minutes break now. Let's have a break now.


Greetings, everyone. Today I want to talk about Pride Month. LGBTQ plus Pride Month is steeped in a history of bravery and courage for those who broke their silence during a police raid at the Stonewall Inn on June 28, 1969. This uprising became known as the Stonewall Riots and laid the foundation for what we celebrate today as Pride Month. For the Department of Defense, Pride is a time to remember and reflect on the countless LGBTQ plus service members who selflessly fought to defend our rights and freedoms in every conflict and branch of service since the founding of our nation. One of those service members was technical Sergeant Leonard P. Matlovich, a Vietnam War veteran who voluntarily served three combat tours. He was awarded the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star.  And we remember Army Colonel Greta Cameron Meyer, whose tireless fight for equality in the armed forces created a legacy that still resonates today. Last November, I was humbled to preside over the christening of the USNS Harvey Milk, an underweight replenishment oiler named after gay rights activists and Navy veteran Lieutenant Junior Grade Harvey Milk. Like so many others, Milk was forced out of the Navy because of his sexual orientation, but that never deterred him. Instead, he continued to serve our nation as a fearless advocate for civil rights, becoming the very first openly gay city commissioner in the United States. It was the courage of these proud service members, and none of those like them, that finally led to the 2011 repeal of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, which resulted in the separation of more than 13,000 service members. This month, we commemorate that policy's repeal, allowing gay service members to serve openly without fear. In 2016, our military took another leap forward with the addition of policies allowing transgender service members to openly serve. And last year, an executive order signed by the president prohibits involuntary separations, discharges, denials of continued service based on gender identity. These milestones have moved us closer to a force where every sailor, marine and civilian, can serve with dignity and respect as their true selves. As of 2018, nearly 10% of our Navy personnel and just over 4% of Marines are serving openly as LGBTQ plus. But there is still progress to be made, whether in uniform or not, all who serve within our department have a right to openly and proudly live their truth without repercussion of discrimination. In May, I released a workplace anti-harassment policy statement, and I urge you all to please read it. I expect you all to continue to cultivate a culture of respect that is fueled by strong leadership, active prevention, and prompt response to harassment. Extremism and prejudice will never be tolerated, not on our watch. Today, we have sailors and Marines and civilians of all genders, races, religions, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and gender identities throughout our department of the Navy. Our people are the military's strategic advantage, and embracing these differences will enrich our experiences and encourage unity. Together, we must continue to promote an environment of diversity, equity, and inclusion within our services, and build a culture of warfighting excellence grounded in respect and opportunity for all. I am incredibly proud of all who serve in the Department of the Navy, and very thankful for the contributions you make every single day. I am proud to be your Secretary of the Navy. Thank you and your families for your service to our nation, and happy Pride Month!


Specialist researchers in Volgograd, Russia have discovered over a dozen ancient disk-shaped objects which they strongly believe to be the remnants of several crashed UFOs, including one object which is over 4 meters in diameter. According to experts, these strange out-of-place disks are coated in a thick layer of tungsten, a high-density metal often used in military technology. Kozmopoisk, the team who made the discoveries, is a notorious Russian UFO and cryptozoology research group. They were performing excavations in the district in an attempt to locate these specific unknown objects. They believe, yet will not share where this information originated from, that these tungsten disks are in fact the remnants of several alien craft which crashed in the area during a quote, event. They had already found about a dozen of these disks. Most of them had a diameter of around 1 meter. At Kozmopoisk, we uncovered a disk-shaped object with a diameter of nearly 2 meters, but this new disk is a unique and impressive find, a member of the team said. The shape of the 4-meter disk is extremely similar to that of our modern-day interpretations of UFOs, and it has clearly given UFO hunters a lot to talk about. It is, as yet, unknown what is within these strange disks of metal. Could there possibly be the remains of ancient pilots? The fact that they are made with a thick outer layer of tungsten is highly compelling. Tungsten is the metal of choice when it comes to high temperatures, this being due to it having the highest melting point of all known metals. It is a prime choice for withstanding the heat from entering Earth's atmosphere. One of the main reasons for its use within military hardware, such as orbital missiles. The newly found disk has been transported to the Zernofsky Museum, where scientists are studying it in an attempt to establish its age and the exact composition of the materials within. Although they clearly reject the possibility of it being an alien craft, they themselves do not know exactly what these disks are, where they came from, how they came into being, or indeed what may lay inside. Earlier this year, another mysterious tungsten-coated disk was discovered in Russia by a mining company near the city of Belovo. The mysterious 1.2-meter disk was located at a depth of 40 meters within the mine, strongly suggesting that it is very ancient. Archaeologists performed several tests, and reluctantly concluded that the perfectly circular object was somehow made by man in the very distant past, though they severely lacked any explanation as to how that was even possible. More information regarding the objects will hopefully be made available after experts analyze them in the Zernofsky Museum in Russia. We will keep you posted. Over the past few years, we have touched upon many of the amazing and often extremely ancient sites which dot our Earth. Many of these spectacular achievements, indicating to the countless specialists, archaeologists, geologists, and others involved, attempting unraveling of their true history, their true story of antiquity. On several occasions, we have been confronted with compelling and often conclusive explorative analysis, which has often resulted in the retrieval of compelling supportive artifacts which have supported the claim of them surviving past cataclysm, often accompanied by an ice age. Our sharing of this data has regularly received a mixed reception. The Sphinx, for example, which shows clear evidence of surviving this past event and subsequent ice age, which involved a flood event. We saw that many were interested in this premise, yet not convinced of such claims. However, a gentleman known as Mario Bildraps has taken this theory and, if confirmed to be correct in his preliminary findings, may have established it as a fact beyond all possible doubt. A link to his website will, of course, be in the description. Mario, it seems, has been very busy. He has correlated the orientation of over 500 ancient pyramids and temples randomly spread around the world to what he claims is a 99% accuracy to the temperature changes during the last glaciation cycles. Most ancient structures, therefore, he has concluded, are hundreds of thousands of years old and not just a few thousand. Many of the pyramids and temples have been renovated over the millennia, new structures forming on top of older foundations, while the orientation of these foundations remain unchanged. Chichen Itze and Baalbeck are two good examples of this practice. He states that the proof is mathematically backed up from start to finish. He adds, the orientation of a building is purely mathematical because orientation is dimensionless or not materialistic. When we process the orientations of virtually all ancient buildings around the world, it reveals a profound discovery. He claims his research is so new, so innovating, that you won't find anything like this anywhere else, except maybe some copies of this original material on other websites. About 57% of the 501 randomly spread ancient structures that were involved in this research accumulate massively in five clusters of together just 20 degrees or 22.2% along the intersection line. This line is also a purely mathematical entity that runs from our current North Pole to our current South Pole along a longitude of 47.1 degrees west. It appears a big chunk of his research has been directed towards developing a cardinal reference line, an imaginary line drawn upon the globe which could be used to match ancient structures to a past location of the cardinal points. Of course, if his mathematics can be peer-reviewed and ultimately found to be correct, he could truly be on to something. His research will not only push back the theories involving the chronological development of man, but also prove beyond doubt pre-Columbian voyage up to a half a million years ago among many other startling realities. The collective orientation of contemporary buildings points almost exactly at our current geographic pole. You might say that the collective unconscious orients itself to the geographical pole, or as many people would say, to the sun. The more data you gather, whether it's in a region, one country, one continent, or the whole world, the more obvious it becomes that contemporary buildings add up to the geographic pole. There is no contemporary culture defined that has a preference for a specific orientation other than a cardinal orientation. It is undoubtedly interesting research, which we implore you to peruse further. We will keep you posted on future developments regarding Mario's work. In the Museum of the Unexplained in Reed Spring, Missouri, a rather peculiar artifact can be found. Known as the Bob White artifact, Bob was driving with a friend down a Colorado highway one night in 1985, when they would both experience a close encounter. As the craft flew over Bob's head, according to Bob, it dropped him a gift, an object which has caused Bob numerous issues. Quote, I don't know about you, but as for me, every time I hear people from Skeptic Magazine lying through their teeth, it makes me sick. They say they have never seen any hard evidence of UFOs. This is only true because they refuse to look at this, a piece of a UFO. So the next time you see the Skeptic Magazine people on Larry King or some other TV program saying there is no physical evidence, you will know they are lying. I have challenged them to debate me, but they are afraid.  That was a statement made by Bob White in the late 90s. He further claimed that in 1996, he was flown to the classified Los Alamos National Laboratory for a detailed analysis of his evidence. White was told by senior staff that the object he recovered was indeed of extraterrestrial origin, also confessing to have successfully collected another object similar to his before. Although the officials fervently denied these claims, in 2000, Bob managed to acquire U.S. Army documents dating from the 1940s titled UFOs in Denmark. Even it were multiple images of an object nearly identical to the one he had. When Dr. Rudolph Olson of Carolina examined the artifact, he concluded, quote, To describe the Bob White object in the simplest possible way, I think you can say it is an agglomeration of rapidly cooled droplets or particles of an aluminum-silicon alloy. With such an unusual structure, I can only speculate on how it was formed. It turns out that this artifact was free-formed, or more precisely, it was somehow cast in a 0G environment without the use of a mold. It has been to over 15 labs and universities over the past 21 years, including Los Alamos, Sallie, New Mexico, etc. If the artifact had been on a machine or a grinder of some sort, there would inevitably have been forensic evidence left upon the artifact. All we know is that it was in a molten state when ejected into a vacuum under extreme pressure within extremely cold conditions. Although Bob White's artifact rarely gains any attention anymore, it is clearly a most compelling piece of evidence in support of the possibility of alien visitation.


The main purpose of this particular session is to help developers use our remote test class. Last year we released more than 380 devices, so that ends up more than one device per day. So, so many devices, developers buying those devices will not be a feasible way. If you can buy it, then we will be really happy, we will get a lot of money. But practically it is not possible, so we came up with the remote test class, here real devices are connected with internet. Through internet, you can deploy your application on top of the device and you can do a testing. So, what exactly you need is, you need a browser which is connected with internet, the browser should be JavaScript enabled and that particular PC should have a Java. RTL works on Windows, it works on MacOS and it works on Linux. How do I connect to RTL? Please go to developer.samsung.com, this is the page. You will get a remote test lab link, connect to that. So, it will run a series of checks on your browser. So, once everything is ok, Java, script enabled, browser, Java is available, kind of browser you are using, then RTL will say yes, you are ready to go. And then click on a particular device, then it will download that particular JNPL5, it will open up an emulator for you. Once you get the emulator, you can drag and drop the application on top of the emulator or a screen which install the application and it is a real device. So, you can do all the functionalities, what you want a real device. So, currently, Tizen RTL is posted in Korean, it posted in Poland and recently it started in India as well. So, you can book a device and then you can see your test history, how long you are used and things like that. If you face problems, then you can report the issues to us and then our team will look into it and then we went back to that. You have an effective session as well, which you can have a look at it before you are posting any queries. RTL.SupportAtSamsung.com is a URL where you can send a link. Our team will respond to that particular query. Okay, this is a real-time device control. So, you can use all the hardware functionality which is available with this. You can share the screen with your colleague or your business partner if you are building an application in a service mode. If you want to share the screens with your partner or the customer, you can run the application and you can share the screens. So, three persons, up to three sessions you can share and three guys can have a look at your screens simultaneously and give the feedback or comment on those particular things. To optimize this whole experience, the quality of a screen can be used in a high resolution or low resolution. It's based on the bandwidth what you are having. You can also use the device in a landscape and a portrait mode. So, the device will be shown in a portrait or a landscape mode and you can actually put the application and test all the features in a portrait and a landscape mode. As it's connected as a real device, so you can actually reboot the test device if needed. And if required, you can even automate the whole application test cases and then if the application will run the test things and then you get the report and you can analyze that particular stuff on that. So, set up devices available like each location we have on multiple devices. You can connect to those devices. You can reserve, for example, you can reserve for 30 minutes. You can reserve for 41 minutes. You can reserve for maybe two hours, up to two hours. If you need additional things, please get back to us. We enable more timings. My reservation gives you your booked slots and then you can, based on your credits, you can book the slots. That's all from the RTL. We'll have a look at the real demo. Meanwhile, I'll talk about Samsung Paisen's App Challenge.


Live from New York, it's theCUBE. Covering Big Data New York City 2016. Brought to you by headline sponsors, Cisco, IBM, NVIDIA, and our ecosystem sponsors. Now, here are your hosts, Dave Vellante and Jeff Britt. Welcome back to New York City, everybody. This is theCUBE, the worldwide leader in live tech coverage. Rob Thomas is here, he's the GM of products for IBM Analytics. Rob, always good to see you, man. Yeah, Dave, great to see you. Jeff, great to see you as well. It's your world traveler. Been all over the place, but good to be here back in New York, close to home for one day. Yeah, at least a day. But the whole community is abuzz with this article that hit, you wrote it last week, it hit new co-shift, I guess just today or yesterday, the end of tech companies. Yes. And you got some really interesting charts in there.   Got Imperva. Teradata. Teradata, Imperva. Yes. Looking pretty, we talked about this last year, just about a year ago, we said, you know, the nose of the plane is up, but the planes are losing altitude and when the funding dries up, look out. Interesting, some companies still are getting funding, so there's some mixed rip currents, but in general, it's not pretty for pure play sort of Hadoop companies. Something that you guys predicted a long time ago, I guess. So I think there's a macro trend here, and this is really, I did a couple months of research and this is what went into that end of tech companies post and it's interesting. So you look at it in the stock market today, the five highest valued companies are all tech companies, what we call, and that's not a coincidence. The reality is, I think we're getting past the phase of there being tech companies and tech is becoming the default and either you're going to be a tech company or you're going to be extinct. I think that's the MO that every company has to operate with, whether you're a retailer or in healthcare or insurance or banking, it doesn't matter. If you don't become a tech company, you're not going to be a company. That's what I was getting at. And so some of the pressures that I was highlighting was, I think what's played out in enterprise software is what will start to play out in other traditional industries over the next five years. Well, you know, it's interesting. We talk about these things years and years and years in advance and people just kind of ignore it. Like Benioff even said, more SaaS companies are going to come out of non-tech companies than tech companies, okay. We've been talking for years about how the practitioners of big data are actually going to make more money than the big data vendors. Peter Goldmacher is actually the first. That was one of his predictions that hit you. Many of them didn't. Peter's a good friend of mine as well. So I always like pointing out what he says that's wrong. But we sort of ignored that and now it's all coming to fruition, right? Your article talks about, it's a long read but it's not too long to read, so please read it. But it talks about how basically every industry of course getting disrupted, we know that, but every company is a tech company. Right. Or else. Right. And you know, what I was, so John Battelle called me last week. He said, hey, I want to run this. He said, because I think it's going to hit a nerve with people. And we were talking about why is that? Is it because of the election season or whatever? People are concerned about the macro view of what's happening in the economy. And I think this kind of strikes at the nerve that says one is you have to make this transition. And then I go into the article with some specific things that I think every company has to be doing to make this transition. It starts with you got to rethink your capital structure because the investments you made, the distribution you model that you had that got you here is not going to be sufficient for the future. You have to rethink the tools that you're utilizing in the workforce because you're going to have to adopt a new way to work. And that starts at the top by the way. And so I go through a couple different suggestions of what I think companies should look at to make this transition. And I guess what scares me is I visit companies all over the world. I see very few companies making these kind of moves because it's a major shakeup to culture. It's a major shakeup to how they run their business. And I use the Warren Buffett quotes. When the tide goes out, you can see who's been swimming naked. The tide may go out pretty soon here. And it will be in the next five years. I think you're going to see a lot of companies that thought they could never be threatened by tech if you will, go the wrong way because they're not making those moves now. Well, let's take cognitive now that we're on this subject because you're having a pretty frank conversation here. A lot of times when you talk to people inside of IBM about cognitive and the impact it's going to have, they don't want to talk about that, but it's real. Machines have always replaced humans. And now we're seeing that replacement of cognitive functions. And so that doesn't mean value can't get created. In fact, way more value is going to be created than we can even imagine. But you have to change the way in which you do things in order to take advantage of that. Right. So one thing I was saying in the articles, I think we're on the cusp of the great re-skilling, which is you take all the traditional IT jobs, I think over the next decade, half those jobs probably go away, but they're replaced by a new set of capabilities around data science and machine learning and advanced analytics, things that are leveraging cognitive capabilities, but doing it with human focus as well. And so you're going to see a big shift in skills. This is why we're partnering with companies like Galvanize, I saw Jim Dieter when I was walking in, Galvanize at the forefront of helping companies do that re-skilling. We want to help them do that re-skilling as well. And we're going to provide them a platform that automates the process of doing a lot of these analytics. That's what the new project data works, a new Watson project is all about, is how we begin to automate what have traditionally been very cumbersome and difficult problems to solve an organization, but we're helping clients that haven't done that re-skilling yet, we're helping them go ahead and get an advantage through technology. We're also going to follow up too on a concept on the capital markets and how this stuff is measured, because as you pointed out in your article, the valuations of the top companies are huge. That's not a multiple of data right now. We haven't really figured that out and it's something that we're looking at. The Wikibon team is how do you value the data from it used to be a liability because you had to put it on machines and pay for it. Now it's really the driver. There's some multiple of data value that's driving those top line valuations that you point out in that article. You know, it's interesting and nobody has really figured that out because you don't see it showing up, at least I don't think in any stock prices. Maybe costar would be one example where it probably has. They've got a lot of data around commercial real estate. That one sticks out to me, but I think about in the current era that we're in, there's three ways to drive competitive advantage. One is economies of scale, low-cost manufacturing. Another is through network effects, number of social media companies have done that well. But third is machine learning on a large corpus of data is a competitive advantage. If you have the right data assets and you can get better answers, your models will get smarter over time. How's anybody going to catch up with you? They're not going to. So I think we're probably not too far from what you say, Jeff, which is companies starting to be looked at as a value of their data assets. And maybe data should be on the balance sheet. Well, that's what I'm saying. And eventually it doesn't move to the balance sheet as something that you need to account for because clearly there's something in the Apple number and the alphabet number and the Microsoft number that's more than regular. Exactly, it's not just about the distribution model. You know, large companies for a long time, certainly in tech, we had a huge advantage because of distribution, our ability to get to other countries face-to-face. But as the world has moved to the internet and digital sales and try-by, it's changed that. Distribution can still be an advantage, but it's no longer the advantage. And so companies are trying to figure out what are the next set of assets. It used to be my distribution model, now maybe it's my data, or perhaps it's the insight that I developed from the data, that's really changed. Yeah, in the early days of the so big data meme taken off, people would ask, okay, how can I monetize the data as opposed to what they're, I think, really asking is, how can I use data to support making money? Right, right. And that's something that a lot of people, I don't think really understood, it's starting to come into focus now. And then once you figure that out, you can figure out what data sources and how to get quality in that data and enrich that data and trust that data, right? I mean, those are, is that sort of a logical sequence that companies are now going through? It's an interesting observation because you think about it, the companies that were early on in purely monetizing data, companies like Dunn and Bradstreet come to mind, Nielson come to mind, they're not the super fast-growing companies today. So it's kind of like there was an era where data monetization was a viable strategy and there's still some of that now, but now it's more about how do you turn your data assets into a new business model? There was actually a great, New Clay Christiansen article was published, I think last week, talking about companies need to develop new business models. We're at the time, everybody has kind of developed and we sell hardware, we sell software, we sell services or whatever we sell. And his point was now is the time to develop a new business model. And those will, now my view, those will largely be formed on the basis of data, so not necessarily just monetizing the data to your point, Dave, but on the basis of that data. So I love the music industry because they're always kind of out at the front of this evolving business model for digital assets in this new world and it keeps jumping, right? It jumped, it was free, then people went ahead and bought stuff on iTunes, now Spotify has flipped it over to a subscription model and the innovation of changing the business model not necessarily the products that much, it's very different. I think it's interesting, it's just the digital assets don't have scarcity, right? They're scarcity around the data but not around the assets per se. So it's a very different way of thinking about distribution and kind of holding back. How do you integrate with other people's data? It's not the same. So think about, that's an interesting example because think about the music and there's a great documentary on Netflix about tower records and how kind of tower records went through the big spike and now it's kind of obviously no longer really around. Same thing goes for the blockbusters of the world. They got disrupted by digital because their advantage was a distribution channel that was in the physical world and that's kind of my assertion in that post about the end of tech companies is that every company is facing that. They may not know it yet but if you're in agriculture and you're a traditional dealer network is how you got to market, whether you know it or not that is about to be disrupted. I don't know exactly what the form that will take but it's going to be different and so I think every company to your point on you look at the music industry kind of use that as a map. That's an interesting way to look at a lot of industries in terms of what could play out in the next five years. It's interesting that you say though in all your travels that people aren't, I would think they would be like clamoring, oh my gosh, I know it's coming, what do I do? Because I know it's coming from an angle that I'm not aware of as opposed to it's like you see a lot of people don't see it coming. It's not my industry, it's not going to happen to me. You know, it's funny, I think, I hear one perception I hear as well, we're not a tech company so we don't have to worry about that which is totally flawed. Two is, I hear companies that, I'd say they use the right platitudes. We need to be digital. Okay, that's great to say but are you actually changing your business model to get there, maybe not. So I think people are starting to wake up to this but it's still very much in its infancy and some people are going to be left behind. So the tooling and the new way to work are sort of intuitive. What about capital structure? What's the implication to capital structures? How do you see that changing? So it's a few things. One is you have to relook at where you're investing capital today. The majority of companies are still investing in what got them to where they are versus where they need to be. So you need to make a very conscious shift and I use the old McKinsey model of horizon one, two and three but I insert the idea that there should be a horizon zero where you really think about what are you really going to start to just outsource or just altogether stop doing because you have to aggressively shift your investments to horizon two, horizon three. You really got to start making bets on the future. So that's one is basically a capital shift. Two is to attract this new workforce when I talked about the great re-skilling. People want to come to work for different reasons now. They want to come to work to work in the right kind of office in the right location that's going to require investment. They want a new comp structure. They're no longer just excited by a high base salary. Like they want participation in upside.  Most companies say, we've always reserved that stuff for executives. There's too many other companies that are providing as an alternative today. So you have to rethink your capital structure in that way. So it's how you spend your money but also as you look at the balance sheet how you actually are spreading money around the company I think that changes as well. So how does this all translate into how IBM behaves from a product standpoint? We have changed a lot of things in IBM. Obviously we've made a huge move towards what we think is the future around artificial intelligence and machine learning with everything that we've done around the Watson platform. We've made huge capital investments in our cloud capability all over the world because that is an arms race right now. We've made a huge change in how we're hiring where we're building offices. So we put an office in Cambridge downtown Boston put an office here in New York downtown. We're opening the office in San Francisco very soon. This is Park Center downtown. So we've kind of come to urban areas to attract this new type of skill because it's really important to us. So we've done it in a lot of different ways. Excellent and then tonight we're going to hear more about that right?  Big announcement tonight. Ritika was on. She showed us a little bit about what's coming but what can you tell us about what we can expect tonight? Our focus is on building the first enterprise platform for data which is steeped in our artificial intelligence. First time you've seen anything like it. You think about it, the platform business model has taken off in some sectors. You can see it in social media. Facebook is very much a platform. You can see it in entertainment. Netflix is very much a platform. There has really been a platform for enterprise data and IP. That's what we're going to be delivering as part of this new Watson project which is data works. And we think it'll be very interesting. Got a great ecosystem of partners that will be with us at the event tonight that are bringing their IP and their data to be part of the platform. It will be a unique experience. What do you, I know you can't talk specifics on M&A but just in general and concept. In terms of all the funding we talked last year at this event, how the whole space was sort of overfunded, overcrowded, you know, and something's got to give. Do you feel like there's been, given the money that went in, is there enough innovation coming out of the sort of Hadoop big data ecosystem? Or is a lot of that money just going to go poof? Well, you know what, I mean, we're an interesting time in capital markets, right? When you loan money and get back less than you loan because interest rates are negative, it's almost, there's no bad place to put money. Like you can't do worse than that. But I think, you know, the Hadoop ecosystem, I think it's played out about like we envision which is becoming cheap storage. And I do see a lot of innovation happening around that. That's why we've put so much into Spark. We're now the number one contributor around machine learning in the Spark project which we're really proud of. Number one. Yes, in terms of contributions over the last year, which has been tremendous. And, you know, in terms of companies and the ecosystem, I look, there's been a lot of money raised which means people have runway. I think what you'll see is a lot of people that try stuff, it doesn't work out, they'll try something else. Look, there's still a lot of great innovation happening. And as much as it's the easiest time to start a company in terms of the cost of starting a company, I think it's probably one of the hardest times in terms of getting time and attention and scale. And so you've got to be patient and give these bets some time to play out. So you're still sanguine on the future of big data. Good. When Rob turns negative, then I'm concerned. It's definitely, we know the end point is going to be massive data environments in the cloud, instrumented with automated analytics and machine learning. That's the future. Watson's got a great head start, so we're proud of that. Well, you've made bets there. You've also, I mean, IBM, obviously a great services company for years services led. You're beginning to automate a lot of those services, package a lot of those services into industry specific software and other SaaS products. I mean, is that the future for IBM? It is. I mean, I think you need it two ways. One is you need domain solutions, vertical eyes that are solving a specific problem. But underneath that you need a general purpose platform, which is what we're really focused on around data works is providing that. But when it comes to engaging a user, if you're not engaging a what I would call a horizontal user, a data scientist or a data engineer or a developer, then you're engaging the line of business person who's going to want something in their lingua franca, whether that's wealth management and banking or payer underwriting or claims processing in healthcare, they're going to want it in that language. That's why we've had the solutions focused that we have. And they're going to want that data science expertise to be operationalized into the products. Yes. You know, it was interesting. You know, we had Jim on and Galvanize and what they're doing and sharp partnership, Rob. You guys said, you know, I think made the right bets here and instead of chasing, you know, a lot of the shiny new toys sort of thought ahead. So congratulations on that. Well, thanks. It's still early days. We're still playing out all the bets, but yeah, we've had a good run here and we'll look forward to the next phase here with DataWorks. All right, Rob Thomas, thanks very much for coming on theCUBE. Appreciate it. It's nice to see you. All right, keep it right there, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest right after. This is theCUBE, we're live from New York City. Right back.


Hi everyone, Joe for jasphyscasebrakes.com. Happy Mosaic Day, new release day. We got 2019-2020 Panini Mosaic Basketball Hobby Edition coming at you. Pick your team number two, all 12 boxes, full case, crush case. There you go. Thanks everyone for getting in on jasphyscasebrakes.com. There you go. There we go. Good luck. Thank you. Nice to finally have some brand new releases here, ladies and gentlemen. This list out of the way here. Let's pop out all these boxes here. Alright, so you can see on the top camera as well as this one, we've got six boxes on top, six boxes on the bottom. That's what we're expecting. Good luck everybody. Brand new release just came out today. Steven, what's going on? Donald, you found a man in the alley, sold you some 2020 Bowman baseball blaster boxes. What did you exchange for that? Michael, what's going on? And we will have a quick autograph and other highlight, kind of a recap at the very end of the video. So if you don't want to sit through this hour long video, or if you're re-watching this, you can just go straight to the end of the video and see where I start doing an autograph recap. Enzyme on recap and jaw recap and whatever other highlights there were in this. Kind of like the stained glass short prints. Some of the top players could be pretty nice too. Alright, there's box one. Alright, good luck. Daniel Smith saying anyone charging stocking cards at a Walmart could make some serious coin. They could. Here's our first autograph for the Miami Heat that goes to Daniel Smith. I don't think, well, I don't think they stock it though. I want to say it's like the person who delivers it stocks it, I think. It's one of those kind of deals. But either way, they're going to know when it comes in, right? Yeah, third party vendor, I think. But either way, they know when it comes in, so they can just snag them. But they never know. Wouldn't the third party vendor stock it at similar times of the week, or is it always different? Yeah, Mark, we had a pink Zion 49. We had a one-of-one Ben Simmons. We had a ton of Lebrons and John Morantz in the previous break. Yannis stained glass insert, which was pretty crazy. Silver Zion right here out of this one. This was the Ben Simmons one-of-one, you know? Yannises, et cetera. All sorts of stuff happening here. Yeah, that was all on Pick Your Team 1. This is Pick Your Team 2. So here's Zion. Silver right here going to the Pelicans. And that will be for Parker Wilson. There you go. That's nice. I didn't think those mega boxes were too bad, though, Mark. I mean, overall. By the way, we're going by those Team USA cards. We're going by Group Break Checklists on that. Let's keep that in mind. Subrex, what's going on? It's obviously Lakers. Got a nice pink Wilt Chamberlain. Lakers to 49. And a Blue Chips Jammarant insert. Nice. And I don't know how short-printed those stained glasses are, but I think we only saw maybe one in the previous case, which was a Yannis. Here's one. This is a Ky-Ree Irving for Kyle and the Nets. I kind of like those stained glass cards. I think they look pretty sharp. There's a Jammarant NBA debut Jammarant in there, too. Yes, it's 12 boxes to a case for a Mosaic hobby edition. By the way, behind my list there. Yeah, we have Rex. I do think those are pretty cool. So I just dropped the schedule. We're a little bit behind schedule, but I have to take photos of some of the nice hits that popped and everything. So a little bit behind schedule. We lolly gagged a little bit in Pick Your Team 1, but I'm going to try to pick it up in Pick Your Team 2 here in future ones so we can squeeze in as much Mosaic as possible for the end of the night. Remember, no naked night tonight, so there is a chance at some breaks that Phil may be pushed till tomorrow. We've got Collide 25. That'll be for the Clippers. That'll be for Walter. MVP, Giannis. All cards shipped, so it's all going to go, but we'll try to pull as much of the nicer stuff as possible. Dwight, and it's definitely the numbered cards, too. Dwight Howard to 49. There's his teammate, LeBron. The Andre Hunter going to Walter and the Hawks. Nice autograph there. Kehl. A couple, Rex. Did I say the three box mosaics get a fast pass? Why would they get a fast pass? No, Jay. The Immaculate gets the fast pass, because that's been on the site for a while. I don't know if that's sold out. Did that Immaculate sell out? No one's told me it's sold out. If so, it'll get fast passed. I'll save a couple Kobe Whites here, too. Nice try, though, Jay. Kawhi Leonard, stained glass. Jon Moran. The only time there will be a fast pass is if there was a break that sold out or was close to selling out and we thought we were going to get it and then we didn't get it. It's pretty rare. Blue chips, Zion. Otherwise, first to fill, first to break. Within the allotted time we have in a given evening. Tonight, no Nick at night, so there's a good chance that some breaks will be rolled over too early tomorrow. LeBron James have been selling pretty well. Nice Kobe White NBA debut to 99. There you go. Adam Kelly with the Bulls. The Yanis. That Kawhi stained glass is selling for $3.50. Basketball prices are wild. Introductions Kobe White. All the stained glasses. I guess they're the shortest shorter of the prints for those inserts, at least. Now these reds aren't numbered, ladies and gentlemen, so I'm breezing by those, but I remember all cards shipped. I'm just trying to save a little time here. All right, next one. Good luck. Well, I can't look at it right now, Maverick. Why don't you tell me about the stained glass Luca? Which is probably in there, the pack that I threw. What's the stained glass Luca going for? Or what are they asking for? It's already over the Luca stained glass, Maverick, saying already over $500 with five days left of bidding. Well, we have a little bit more mosaic left. Jaspeyscasebreaks.com and Jason Jaspey has personal boxes of mosaic. I don't know how much he has left, but he has some available on Jaspeys.com. So I'll drop the personal box because we're pretty much booked all the way for the next four or five hours. So if you want to scratch the itch and get a box for yourself and get it with Jason right now and all cards shipped to you once again. So, I mean, you're already seeing in the chat just how crazy the values of these cards are. There's Jeremy Lam for the Pacers to $99. That'll be for Richard. So, got to ship everything. PJ Washington, Buddy Heald, Introduction to Base RJ Barrett, LeBron James Montage. It's a good photography there too. It's not numbered, but that'll go to the Lakers. He's got my Lakers in this one. Who does? Who, who, a Lynn, thank you. Schofield, AD, MVP's LeBron. I don't think we've seen that one yet. Yanis Base, Alec Burks and Grant Williams for the Celtics. That's for Daniel Smith. There you go. The Grant Williams autograph. It's kind of cool that... I like the fact that there has been a shift at least in recent months, in the last six months, eight months. There's been a steady shift towards more value in the parallels than the autographs themselves. Which I think is cool. Pascal Siakham to 25. So not just about the autographs or the low numbered relics anymore. Which I think is cool. Nicola Melli, Augustine, Harden, RJ Barrett, Introduction, different parallel there. I might as well grab that RJ too. For the Knicks. Definitely have some upside there. Nice Kobe White NBA debut Silver, which is pretty neat. Different Jammarant. Might be a variation. This is the Jammarant with his teal jersey. Philip Barber. Nice Silver NBA debut Kobe White for Adam Kelly and the Bulls. Oh, nice. I'm trying to find a way for this. I think we can put it all here. All here? Yeah, I think so. Oh, yeah. Today we're probably not allowing music today. These hour long bricks. Alright, so you got Nick on the Nick Cam right there. Wait, we need to change that angle. Yeah. I think this just needs to be on the end. That's better. So you can see Nick on the Nick Cam right there helping us rip open some boxes. Which will further save time in the light. It looked like it was a pink. It was not. Alright, Stephen Molina says what's up, Nick? Hey, Stephen. We are also properly socially distanced away. Part of this today. I know. It's a little behind, but we're getting caught up. Here we go. Why don't you just slice it? Oh, you're already done. I'll trade you. Alright, here we go. AV, there are two Anthony Venturinos. Can you make a change to one in the randomizer to separate who gets who? Oh, in this one? Oh, maybe in a later break? Yeah, I was going to say it might be easier if... I could do that on my own. Yeah, I think we can add a number to... Yeah, which number? Do you or the other Anthony... your family, I think? No. The shipping team wants it one and two. Oh, okay. Alright, I think we can change that into system. Just add a one next to their last name, right? Yeah, it'll automatically populate that number one. Just whenever you go through his orders, you'll have to copy the number two. Yeah, but you'll have to go in the shop to buy and see which one. Okay. I don't think we'll show up on the conference. Alright, I have the post-it note here, so we can... We'll sort it out, Anthony, thank you. I appreciate that. What does he think of this craziness so far? That's stair masters. Oh, I get it. They got some puns here in this, Nick. I like it. They're stair masters, but like you're staring at someone. And then there's international men... No, not international men of misery. International... I don't know, I have to find one of those. Way less of this than there is prison. I'll tell you that. So international men of mastery, instead of international men of misery, like the Austin Powers movie. They're playing a little bit with that center stage. Austin Powers? Yeah, they kind of made an Austin Powers reference. There's a Yanis Pink. Nice, 47 out of 49. Noah, you're saying your wife asked you to spray Lysol in all the cars and packages you're buying lately? I feel like... I feel like COVID doesn't travel well. But I don't know, there's... No one really knows, I guess. Couldn't hurt, I guess. Couldn't hurt, I guess. But then you have to think of the odds of someone who actually has it, who is actually working, who coughs onto a package, have it take and stick on the package, and then have it survive all the different, you know, conveyor belts and factories and hot trucks and airplanes and stuff that it has to go through, then get to your hub, and then get to your place and still has it living, that COVID living on the box, and then you inhale it. What are the odds of that, I don't know. Look at this Yanis stained glass. You're saying these stained glasses go for zillions of dollars, Snake? What did that Zion... What did this Yanis want to go again? I think that we had... We had one and pick your team one. We just rip it ourselves and just profit off all these. I know, that Yanis is going for like... Someone said three, four hundred bucks. Just that stained glass. We pulled a Kauai Leonard stained glass and that was going for like a few hundred dollars. I think Jason sells boxes for seventy dollars below what Panini was selling. I know, Jay's pics or whatever was trying to get us to raise prices. Everyone said no, so I said fine. He was just good. He was like, you guys are really cheap according to what Panini has. Jay Scott pics is our most popular subscriber, I think. Does that get him any brownie points? No, sorry. We've got to raise our prices. That's what Jay's got pics. When you sort by most subscribers, I think he's got fourteen thousand subscribers. He's got fourteen thousand subscribers? Yeah, I don't know what Jay picks. What do you pick? What pics do you have? Like horse racing? It's not numbered. I thought it would be numbered, but these Lucas are still nice. White prison right there. An introduction to John Morant. I'm happy that Jay's looking at for our profits, though. All right, the redemption. Last two redemptions, Nick. Kairi Irving. Jayne Worthing. All right, I'll guess this one is Malcolm Brogdon. Malcolm Brogdon it is. Or Steph Curry. Oh, Otto? Yeah, autographs mosaic. The redemptions have all been studs so far. He's loaded. Travis Stevens. Brad's brother with the Golden State Warriors. Nice. He makes sports handicapping videos. Nice. Nick and I do like a bit of the gambling. I don't know, you were just in a groove. You might have just ended up doing the entire case. I appreciate that. Which will probably catch up on time for figure team three. Yeah, we got five or six cases allotted to us. So, not a lot. So, everyone sees on this camera the final two boxes right here. We'll give it to Nick. Let's slide a couple more onto this screen right up here. Be careful, these are kind of slippery. I can imagine you're like with a deck of cards and sometimes you don't shuffle it right. I could see that happening with this mosaic. It'd be bad news. Bad news bears. Blue chips, RJ Barrett, center stage, Giannis. Does he have KBO picks, Jay? Jay, you got KBO picks for us? What have you been making videos of this? There's no sports there. I know, that's sad times for Jay's got picks. I guess KBO. NASCAR. Bundesliga. GULF. Did you watch Bundesliga? No. I'm not that desperate, I'll be honest. I don't know what channel it's on. I'm not just on early enough to ever see it and I don't really have a team so I don't end up DVR'ing or anything like that. Eric Pascal. Autograph for the Warriors. Jay, you ever do those contests? Nick and I, I don't know if we're going to do it this year. It feels like a weird team tonight. I don't know if we're going to do that this year. So busy now. Well mosaics sold outs is Jason. I guess we just have those three box random team breaks. Is it? Wait, Fox has Bundesliga? 25. Pascal Siakam. Those contests were easier when we only did like 10 breaks today? Right, yeah. Now it's kind of, I don't really have time for it. But last couple of years, Jay's got picks. We did a, Nick and I split entries into the Circa Million Football Contest last year and then the year before that Westgate Super Contest. I don't know, which one do you like better? I don't know. Well we have to do, oh they have weekly bonuses now. What was it? Well we have to do Super Contest Gold if we want to be eligible for the quarter bonuses. But Circa just gave us a quarter bonus, which is like $100,000. Yeah. I like the quarter bonuses. Because if you're out of it, then... You still play? Yeah. You didn't just drop $2,000 on an entry. We haven't cashed in the last couple of years on two. We haven't cashed, but we got pretty close. We had respectable records picking five games a week for the NFL. Pelicans, that'll be for Parker. I think we were just under 60%, which I think is pretty solid. Silver, Yanis, it's even better. All those Bucks cards are going to Josh Reich. The Lebrons for Hua, Lynn are also pretty strong too. So don't sleep on those as well. A lot of those cards are going to go for a lot. RJ Barrett John Morant blue chips is pretty nice. I am a... I like betting baseball and points. I don't do... I'm terrible at totals. So it's just like spread and money line. No parlays. There's not, Brian, there's a four box version and a three box version. The three box version says three box on it. And the four box version says four boxes on the title. I know, sorry, we used the same picture so it looks the same. Goren Draugage, we were in a rush. With the Goren Draugage. Every once in a while a goof around with a parlay, Jay's picks, but... We haven't really talked a lot of sports gambling and stuff like that just because there hasn't been a lot of sports to talk about. But it is a frequent topic of conversation that we have here. Parlays is only if I have an extra 10, 20 bucks and I just want to goof around with something. I'll do that. We'll very rarely do teasers too. I mean, I don't really actually... Sometimes I'll do a teaser if I'm in NFL if Nick and I did our five picks and we were pretty confident about it that particular week. We'll tease it over key numbers. No, it wasn't. That's just a regular Zion. Regular Zion. Silvers look like this. You can tell pretty easily. So sometimes we're confident we'll tease five picks over a particular number. A key number. Otherwise... No. I mean, unless I'm just goofing around. What so, Tony Parker? I have no idea how to bet golf. I mean, I know how to bet golf, but I don't know like what our value picks and whatnot. Baseball, I ended up with like a... ended up having like a bit of a system to try to find small little edges on particular games. Baseball, you can always find value in underdogs in general, which I enjoy doing. More Zions flying out of here. Royce O'Neill is the 25. Introductions. Kobe White. An all-card ship, ladies and gentlemen. So just keep that in mind. So in case I miss like a key variation or something like that. I apologize, but everything will ship just in the interest of time. We're trying to be a little more efficient on this. I'm going to catch up on the schedule anyway. There's a Silver Giannis and a Ben Simmons. More Giannis. Dremon. Ben Simmons to 49. Nice Giannis Silver. Betting against the Lakers gave you your best basketball year in a while. Yeah. I mean Lakers are already a popular team. So they're always going to get like get people betting on them. They're a very public team. And then you add LeBron to it.  Here's a Silver Gian right here. NBA debut Gian. LeBron on the road. Double digit favorites. You can always go against that. Especially in this Cavs days and get a boatload back. Parker with the Pels. Nice one, Parker. And Harrison Barnes is your autograph. Sacramento Kings. That's going to go to Daniel Smith. Nice Barnes-y. Blue Chips, Jamerat. All of these add up, of course. I just want to pull that. Should be pulling more of these Luka Donchiches, but I was hoping to get like a Silver one or something like that. Donchich Silver's I'm sure will go extremely well on the secondary market. That card should too. Eric Pascal for the Warriors Steph Curry. Wow. All sorts of things popping in this one here. In this little group. First we've got a Zion base. Then we've got a Steph Curry stained glass. Which this is like our fourth one of the case. But it looks like they're the shortest printed of all the inserts. They're fewer and far between. Blue Chips, RJ Barrett and for the Warriors, Eric Pascal. But those stained glasses apparently are sounding like hot cakes on a secondary market. Another parallel for Yanis. John Morant's got one too. So Grizzly's Philip Barber gets this Mosaic Parallel John Morant introductions. RJ Barrett introductions. This is the first one. This just must be the base parallel. Base Mosaic I think. Mosaic Yanis. I don't think we've seen one of those yet. But for the Bucks of course. That's going to go to Josh Reich. All of those out of Josh. I think you're up pretty nicely already. Zion Bases. I feel like those prices change every day. And I feel like I'm always under. Stephen Molina. Zion Bases card. What does that go for out of Mosaic? Must be like 30 Bucks. Zion Bases. Zion Silver 100 Bucks. Maybe more. Mosaic. Ungraded. Wow, 75-80 Bucks for a Zion base. There you go. Munder. That's why I just crowdsource the information. I'd just be like, hey. What's the latest market price? A little Chamberlain to 99. Tatum. It's an NBA debut that goes for 30. Crazy, right? Nice center stage. Luka Donchich, Dallas Mavericks. Luka Lin with that one. The second-year Donchich is also selling well on a secondary market. There's the NBA debut, Zion. There's another Zion right there. Boom. That's a good question, Sean. I feel like you should just be able to walk right up to them in San Ana and just be like, here's my stuff. I don't know if they have a retail space or a public space where you can do that. They should. Another Donchich for Lin. Another Washington. Pink to 49. That'll be for Jay Kinney in the Hornets. Ron James. And Cody Martin is your autograph. There you go. A couple Hornets right there for Jay. The debut should be a little less valued a little less than the actual. The debut is considered like an insert. I think that's why it goes for a little bit less than the silver itself. I think that's our first mosaic. MVP's LeBron. All right. So we've got four boxes left right here. Carefully grab all four here. One. All right. Good luck. This is Pick Your Team 2. Almost done. Wow. Zion Williamson Blue. 63 out of 99. And that will go to Parker Wilson and the Pelicans. That's pretty nice. That should cover the spot. And then some in addition to all the other Zion's out there too. Saquidin Boya. Autograph for Matt Subtlefield. There you go Matt. And then a gold. Zach Collins. 8 out of 10. Portland. It's going to go to Matthew Bodner. And then we've got the NBA debut. Zion. Keeps just adding up for the Pelicans. It's really nice. Zion base. Three more boxes to go. Nizmo saying, what do you think a select gold out of 10 goes for? Of who? All depend on the player of course. You have your game ticket from Kobe's last game that he wants sent to PSA? That'd be pretty cool. Yeah, I don't know how much they would charge for memorabilia like that. I think it's probably less than you think. But I think you can probably get, there's Jackson Hayes 49. But you probably pay up for like faster return. Faster return service. Another Saquidin Boya. Another autograph from Matthew Subtlefield. It's nice. We've stained glasses apparently. They're doing very well. That's James Harden for the Rockets. That's going to be for John. Maybe save a couple more Kobe whites. Set those aside. John Morant NBA debut is nice. A lot of Grizzlies being racked up for Phillip. Pretty solid break thus far. A lot of different hits here. A lot of great hits. Remember, a lot of the value is in the parallels folks. Cody Martin too. Next stack here. Oscar Robertson, Tatum. I see another gold in there somewhere.  PNW wants to know, what do you think about SGC compared to PSA or BGS? I'm not too familiar with SGC to be honest with you. I know of their existence, but I don't have enough knowledge on that. Anyone else want to put their two cents in the chat? Sergio Baca to 99. Steve Millicent, the SGC is on the come up lately. It's an option for Sean Corbett, but not the one for him. Derek saying, no idea on SGC except probably won't get the same value on that card if you try to sell it. I think that's what hurts. It's kind of the lack of broad knowledge about SGC may impact sales of your card on a secondary market. But maybe one to keep an eye out for. Maybe you're not sending your zions there, but maybe send some other stuff there and see how you like the service and maybe give them a shot and maybe they grow into something more substantial. There's Dylan Windler, Cavs, that'll be for Eric Bailey. And Lastbox coming up, I need more top loaders too. Lastbox ladies and gentlemen, this is Pick Your Team 2. We've got another Pick Your Team coming up right after this. And then we'll go through some more orders and figure out what else we're going to do tonight. Now, this is no naked night tonight ladies and gentlemen. There's Bradley Beal. What's that? Immaculate. So Immaculate's getting fast-passed. That's been delayed a number of times. Sold out a number of times, delayed a number of times. Immaculate's actually up next folks. I will readjust the schedule after this, but Immaculate Hoops has been fast-passed because there's been a zillion delays. Sold out, refunded, sold out again. So we're going to knock that out and then I could use a little break in between these hour-long breaks anyway. So it'll be a nice pallet cleanser and then we'll dive right back into some more mosaic. Danny's saying you don't know the difference between them. He did watch a conspiracy video about PSA giving only specific people 10s. PNW heard the same thing about PSA. I mean, yeah, like Sean was saying you know, when you get to a certain level of business, I guess there are more people that are salty they're not getting 10s. There's probably only a certain amount of people in the world who can rip enough packs to send enough 10s to grading services, so it may seem like they're the only ones getting it, but how can you prove it though? It's one of those tricky things where when people say, well you can't disprove it that doesn't mean it's true. Nice John Moran NBA debut silver this time for Philip Barber. And a Bruno Fernando autograph for Walter and the Atlanta Hawks. Almost there folks. I think this does clock in just under an hour and bowl, bowl at the very end all card ships you're going to be getting all of this wonderful mosaic stuff ladies and gentlemen. That was Pick Your Team 2. Here is a quick recap. It doesn't represent everything but it represents the autographs and some of the nicer stained glass stuff. The nice Zions the Dumboyas, that blue Zions Mosaic LeBron James' Luka Donchich Center Stage, Mosaic MVP's more stained glass more Harrison Barnes Silver NBA debut Zion was nice Silver Giannis Silver MVP's Giannis All of those selling pretty well on the secondary market. Pretty great break Steph Curry autograph was nice. So a lot of great stuff stuff popping out of here Pink Giannis to 49 This is a pretty great case actually looking back on it.  Another great case in the books. I'm Joe for jaskyscasebreaks.com We'll do more with you later tonight.


Everybody forced here up in 2022 Immaculate Collegiate and 2021 Immaculate football hobby three box mixer number four Random team style break. You can always check out the results at latinsportscards.com. I did drop you a link in chat as well Let's get started everybody. Good luck. Make sure I have Google up for a Start with the two Immaculate Collegiate boxes starting off with a Russell Wilson 10 of 35 Broncos Wisconsin Russell Wilson Broncos 10 of 35 and Immaculate Inc. Ozzie knew some 15 to 25 Browns, right? Did he even play for anybody else? Ozzie knew some Let's see. Let's see. I don't think he did. Did he know every single year was with the Browns There you go. Browns nice hit there on the Aussie dual UNC auto Javonte Williams and Sam Howell. That's Broncos in Washington Should be random to all at the end Washington is Rachel G and Broncos William M. Random at the end Cowboys prime patch auto Jalen Tolbert 92 of 99 bills RPA six of 15 James Cook Bills on that one nice purple parallel there two-color patch It's dual Jersey James and Williams Lyons and Jalen wild dolphins 24 of 99 lion shawndee and dolphins Nelson the random at the end Williams and waddle one more Immaculate Collegiate The ticker keeps talking about the flooding Yeah Like roads are closed all over the place like they were 46 9 of 35 Joe Montana for the Niners longest ten years than Niners Introduction Zotto Brian Robinson jr. 19 out of 99 for the football team Dolphins auto Ricky Williams 14 of 49 And longest ten year for Ricky is the dolphins So it's gonna be random to all at the end. It's a Phil Jerkovec auto 5 of 49. He's still in college On the Jerkovec there. It's random to all at the end Washington Prime Patch auto Johan Dotson 33 of 99 and new era hat patch Derek Stingley Jr. 4 of 5 Texans Nice card Texans 2021 Immaculate now Here we go Washington Chase Young 42 of 75 Giants rookie clearly Immaculate Jersey Cadarius Tony 5 out of 49 Giants again triple patch auto mark Bavaro 60 of 99 Player worn Bavaro there's rookie shadowbox signatures Justin Fields 46 of 49 Congrats Bears There you go Chicago nice hits. We'll get that mag for you. There is some like scuffing over here That might come off looks like a thumbprint of some yeah, that's a thumbprint of Well, I don't what you we have to put your thumb in to put that on the card to make that I don't know but We'll get a empty box and wrap around in case it doesn't come off clean Bears nice hit Falcons triple Jersey auto Tony Gonzalez 31 up 35 a Falcons Tony Gonzalez Yeah, that's weird You know, he was still really good there for a while and Rookie patch auto Eagles Kenneth Gainwell 42 of 99 Eagles with the gain well. All right three randoms now So first one is random to all say Phil Jerkovec auto to 49 random to all spots Next one James and Williams and Jalen wattle That's lions and dolphins on the dual relic there and then dual auto Javonte Williams Sam Howell Broncos and commanders random Good luck We'll go 11 times here 11 times on each. All right, it's for the Jerkovec auto one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven Nelson v. The dual receivers here 11 times one two three four five six seven eight nine ten 11 Dolphins up top and the dual auto here 11 times one two three four five six seven eight nine ten and eleven Broncos up top. All right, and that is gonna do it. Everybody. Thanks again We've got an Immaculate collegiate case coming up now