Hey y'all, it's Timmy with Colored Valley Cuts. I'm about to make tea and I'm using my kettle and I fill it up to the 1.25 liter more before I make my tea. And I use Tetley tea bags. I like Tetley tea to me. It doesn't have a better flavor even if you decide to boil it a little bit. And I use the family size bags. I'm gonna put three of these in my kettle. We're gonna be making sweet tea today. And I've already pressed the button so it won't take it but a minute. But we're gonna be making sweet tea today and we're gonna be making hot chocolate. Because I know a lot of y'all are freezing and you're snowed in here in St. Mary's at 60 degrees in Christmas fishing. And I was just talking to Melissa on the phone and she was like, go do hot chocolate for them. And I thought, well, I think I will. So we're also gonna make some hot chocolate but we're gonna make this tea first, okay? And let me bring y'all down a little closer to me. I don't have my man here today to help me. All right, so we're gonna be using a gallon jug just like this, okay? This is what I like to make my tea in. So if you use a gallon jug for your CPAP or for whatever you use your water for, make sure you save them. It's great to make your tea also to take to different places. Of course, right now with COVID, we're not going to church and taking a bunch of stuff anymore.  Oh, it went off. Why is it off? No, it's not off, it's still green. I'll be blue. Lord of mercy. Anyway, so what I'm gonna do is I am going to, I don't know why, oh, I know why now. I am going to put sugar in my jug, all right? So I take a gallon jug and I get a funnel. And this is sugar. Now my kettle's about to start boiling. And I put one and one third cup of sugar in here. Now you can reduce or increase the amount of sugar if you wish, but I will say, and I'm not gonna quite use a third, one and one third, I'll use one and a little bit. I will say though that tea is never, in my opinion, never good. When you sweeten it to drink it the day of, you should always make your tea a day ahead, not the day of your function. Put it in the refrigerator and let it sit overnight. Makes it taste so much better because the sugar just gets in there and the tea just tastes so delicious. If you drink it the day you make it, it's never as sweet, so it takes more sugar. But you can use less sugar if you get it good and cold, okay? You can see it now. Sorry about that, a cop came through because I didn't have to not disturb turned on my phone while we're live. And a lot of people would use their kettles but they only use them for water and they don't put their tea in here. But I personally put my tea bags in here. It only brings it to a boil for just a second or two, not long at all. And if you use totally tea, it doesn't make it better at all, okay? And I was raised on Tetley tea. Now my mama didn't do it this way. Of course she didn't have a kettle. Neither did she put it on the stove top. My mama would, it's about to start boiling. I love to watch it boil and that's why I've got y'all so that you can watch it. But my mama would just run a lot of hot water, just get water really hot and she would pour it over her tea bags and then she would let them sit in the tea, let the tea seep, in other words, during the day and that at night she would put her water in. So mama would let her seep just in some really hot water. She would never put it on the stove top like I, or do what I'm doing today. Now in this kettle you'll see that it rises as it boils. So what I do is I don't bring it. I don't put enough water in there for a maximum. I only put enough in there, I put two notches down. I also keep it in a pie plate so that if for any reason it bubbles over the top like it's doing now, the bubbles are just raising and raising and that way if for any reason it bubbles over this pie plate catches it y'all and that's a good thing to use if you're boiling in your kettle. If you're putting your tea in your kettle because the tea does make it boil up and fizz up kinda, okay? So now it's so hot. I've also had somebody do this. Say, I made your tea and it melted my jug and I'm thinking why would you put boiling water in your jug? So you need to let your tea cool down until it's not scalding hot but warm enough to melt your sugar. Another thing you can do is you could just put some water in your jug and then put the really hot water in there because it's still gonna be really warm enough to melt your sugar and that's what we're gonna do today because I wanna use my kettle for something else. So I'm gonna bring y'all down a little closer. Y'all were just gonna go for a few rides today in order for me to do a good video for y'all and let you see what I'm doing and not just see me, okay? I don't wanna just be the star of the show. So we've got sugar in there. So what we can do now is put a little actual cold water in here because I'm gonna pour this really hot water in this jug and when I pour it in this jug, I don't want it to melt the jug. So if I go ahead and fill it about a third full with cold water, not hot water, it will not melt the jug when I add it to the jug, if that makes sense. So never put your boiling water directly into the jug without some cold water in it, okay? Or just wait until your tea cools down enough that it's not gonna melt your jug. And I also use this stainless steel funnel. I love my stainless steel funnels. Do you know that they were actually gifted to me from a viewer and I just absolutely love them. I couldn't live without them now. I actually sent my brother some the other day. So I have figured out that if I put about a third cup of water in my jug, have a seat, then it does a pretty good job of not burning up my jug. Now I'm gonna shake it and I'm gonna mix all that sugar up, turn it over to the side, do it over the sink just in case you have an accident. It looked like my power just went off for a second. And there you have your sweet tea. We're going to finish adding our water to it to make a full gallon. And now I will actually let this sit out at room temperature until it comes all the way to room temperature because it's still pretty warm. And then once it comes to room temperature, I'll put it in the refrigerator. I don't like to put anything real hot in my refrigerator. And then I'll put it in my refrigerator. I will not drink this tea until tomorrow. If you drink your tea the day you make it, it is not that good. So if you've always wondered, why doesn't my tea taste like Mama's does? Or why don't my tea taste as good as everybody else's? It could be as simple as you are making it and drinking it immediately, which is not what you wanna do, okay? Now we're about to do some hot chocolate. I am going to not just do the recipe for hot chocolate. Now the sweet tea recipe is in my, I believe it's in my login to Cookbook, the Georgia sweet tea.  Manufactured in Georgia. And that's why I love Tetley tea. Tetley tea is spelled T-E-T-L-E-Y. I don't know if this is backwards for y'all or not, and if it is, I'm sorry. All right, and then, because I just did a reset on my phone so it may be, and then you got hot chocolate mix that's in my third Cookbook. Now it helps you make a good bit of hot chocolate, okay? But I only wanna make one cup of hot chocolate, and you're saying, well, how do I make just one cup of hot chocolate? Well, the recipe calls for a cup, a cup, a cup, a half cup, and a quarter cup. So instead of using a cup, you're gonna look at it like tablespoons. So you'd use one tablespoon, one tablespoon, one tablespoon, a half of a tablespoon, which is one and one half teaspoons, and then a quarter of a tablespoon would be a teaspoon, pretty much. And so we're going to make us some delicious, delicious hot chocolate. Now, I am going to rinse out this kettle right quick, and we are going to get the tea out of it and put a little water in it so that we can, sorry y'all, y'all have the best of yous right this second. I'm just gonna rinse it out and we'll get a little bit of water in it to make our hot chocolate. If you don't have one of these kettles, they're so convenient to use, especially for things like this. You can also use them for other things, but if you just need some hot water, they're really nice to have around the house. So I'm gonna press the button so that that starts getting hot and boiling. And while that's doing that, we're gonna put our hot chocolate mix in our cup. But you know what I didn't do? I didn't get out a good hot chocolate cup. So let me go get a cup and I'll be right back. And I'm gonna show y'all the ingredients we're gonna put in our hot chocolate and we're gonna make a delicious cup of hot chocolate. My clear cup, I got things at Dollar Tree one year. They're clear and that way y'all can see it when I mix it up. So what we're gonna do now is, let me fix the angle because y'all don't have to see exactly what, you know, it's not like I'm cooking something. So what we're gonna use is a tablespoon. I also have a half tablespoon. Okay, I have a tablespoon. I have a half tablespoon. And then we're gonna use a teaspoon. So, and if it's one and a half teaspoons, you can eyeball it, you know. So what we're gonna do is we're going to use a tablespoon of sugar. Yes, we are, because we're gonna put some cocoa in here. All this is dry ingredients, except for my evaporated milk. I tell you to use powdered milk when you're just making a mix.  But today I don't want the powdered milk in mine. You can always throw some real cream in there. This is evaporated milk, which is my favorite. All right, you're going to use some cocoa and you're gonna use a half a tablespoon of cocoa. And this cocoa, I've been wanting to taste it. I really haven't, I bought it for the holidays and they never used it. But this cocoa, I got, I believe it, bells or boss or somewhere like that. And it was $7.99 of this huge bag of cocoa and I thought, man, I'm trying to get smells really good. So I'm gonna find out whether or not it tastes good. The brand is Terra Soul Super Foods. I like to look at their specialty foods. That's where I get all my spices. All my spices came from stores like that. I love the, they're called gourmet collections. And I'll show you all these, those before we leave just so you can see them. The next time you go into bells or Ross or Marshalls or home goods, go to that section and see if they have these gourmet collection spices because they're well worth the money you spend, they're usually $3.99 for a big bottle of them. And I'll show you the different ones I found over the years really and what I like to use. But anyway, we've got a tablespoon. We've got one and a half teaspoons or a half tablespoon of cocoa. We're going to put in a tablespoon of powdered creamer. I am gonna use the powdered creamer, just not the powdered milk. We're gonna use some instant coffee. It's optional, but we are going to put it in ours today. If you've got instant coffee, my favorite instant coffee is the Nest Cafe, I believe it's Folders and it's, or no, I think this is Taster's Choice, Columbian and then Folders makes a really good one too. But I like the dark roast, okay? So our water's boiling and I'm gonna put in a teaspoon of this coffee. I surely am. So now we've got all of our dry ingredients in here, I'm gonna stir them up. So we got the cocoa, the coffee, the powdered creamer and the sugar. And now all of them do, once I put in the water, is put in a dollop of this can cream. I've got an opener right here that I absolutely love. It's same steel. Y'all, this is work the money you pay for and I think it's, I know it's less than $10 on my website. It's an XO, OXO product, you know, but it's same steel and oh my gosh, it'll open bottles and it'll open your cans of evaporated milk and like, tomato juice and stuff like that. And I just love using it. I'm sure you have one growing up and if you haven't used one in a while, they really come in handy because they make everything more pourable, okay? So we are going to, I'm gonna bring y'all down so y'all can watch me mix this up because I want y'all to see it. And we may even put a little whipped cream on the top for fun today. I bet y'all need to be warmed up some of y'all, especially those that are in this Arctic freeze. There's so many of y'all right now in this Arctic freeze that aren't used to getting cold weather. Bless your heart. I feel for ya. Put in our hot water and of course, if you want to use milk by all means, warm you up some milk to put in your hot chocolate. And now I'm gonna put a dollop of this creamer and I'm gonna give it a try and I'm gonna see if it's sweet enough for me. And to me it is. Now, if it's not sweet enough for you, of course you can add a little more sugar to it. But I think it's just right. And now I'm gonna do something else. And that is put a little whipped cream on the top. Let's go all out. Chris St. Hey, you will have a treat today. And you can put a little chocolate on the top if you want to for your kids, for your grandkids. I just have Hershey bar. Yes, I do. So what we'll do is grate just a little bit of chocolate to go on top of it. This is a good cup. Nothing's better than a Hershey bar, right? I got this because it was in a Valentine gift. Chris got me a couple of things for Valentine's Day. I'll show them to y'all. Now that is a delicious cup of hot chocolate. I will show y'all what he got me for Valentine's Day right quick. And I will also show y'all how I decorated for Easter and the kitchen. Let me raise this up a little so y'all can see. You can see I've got a cross up there and it says amazing grace. Because you know, Easter is all about the Savior, Jesus Christ or our Savior. And I bought this, let me turn this around so I can do this better. Okay, I got this. And they had these eggs, these eggs that are on sticks. And so I took them and I put them inside this for decoration and then I can take them out of it and still keep this floral for the rest of the springtime. Isn't that cute? Now Chris got me this for Valentine's Day. It is an old fashioned measuring cup. Back then they measured, it's got a half pint, a pint, a one and a half pint in a quart. So he got me this at a consignment type store. She sells all kind of old antiques. Now I've had the tulips since last year and this is a rabbit that I found at Marshall's, I believe. She's a cookie jar and she's just really pretty. Chris helped me decorate for Easter and he doesn't let me put out as much. He really is a better decorator than I am. This is my Wedgewood tableware. Daddy bought me this. He bought it second hand. It is Queensware Wedgewood and he only paid like $125 for a whole huge set of it. And so I decided I'd display some for Easter. That's the teacup. And you can see I put out my thumb print glass because it is springtime and it's so pretty and green. And then he brought this piece in here as well. And then you'll see here we put out our glasses. We've got our Wedgewood out and yes, we're gonna use it, a little rabbit. And then these are plates that I found and some of y'all have already seen them but they have a scripture on them. It says, the Lord is my strength and my shield. My heart trusts in him. So I'm 28-7 and I just really thought these were pretty. They had them at Ross and they had them in sets of four. I went ahead and got two sets. Now you could go to your local Ross. Be careful, wear your mask and see if they may have something like this. And lots of times anything Ross has, marshals, bells, home goods, all three of those other ones could also have it. Okay, this is an antique and so I put it out because it's kind of blue. It's got a little blue in it. And of course I put out a few of the canned goods that we have. And then on this I've got all my glass that I use and this big rabbit and some eggs. So that's our kitchen decor for Easter. What y'all think? Y'all like his gifts, he got me. So he got me the measuring cup. Oh, I forgot to show you one. He got me the measuring cup and he also got me this.  They for real used it to mash their potatoes. So a lot of y'all probably remember this being used to mash your potatoes. If you do remember it, tell us about it and tell us how you remember. But that's what this is, an old fashioned potato masher. It says antique primitive within potato masher. It was only $11. So he bought me that and he bought me the measuring cup and that was my Valentine gift. The Hershey bar was actually part of my decoration in here for Valentine's. So that's where that came from. Let's taste our hot chocolate. Maybe it's cooled down enough I can drink it. It's still pretty dog on hot, but it's so good. That little bit of coffee makes it taste so good y'all. I hope y'all have enjoyed being in the kitchen with me today. It's Monday. I like to take Mondays and get organized, maybe prep some of your vegetables, make your sweet tea for the week and do a few things like that, clean out the refrigerator and tonight I plan on making chicken and dumplings and I'll probably record it, but maybe I'll get to see it one day this week because I wanna make dumplings and make extra ones for my blackberry cobbler. So I may either do one or the other tonight or maybe do both, I don't know, but you won't see it until the rest of the week. I hope y'all have a blessed and wonderful day, President's Day all, and God bless ya. And thanks for watching Colored Valley Cooks where we cook like mama did and I'll put these recipes in the description post when we sign off just like I always do. Bye y'all love ya. Wish y'all were here would have a cup of hot chocolate.  See ya.


What's going on, everyone? Sam here with late in sports cards ripping one box of 22 Bowman Draft Super Jumbo for Dan B. It's good luck here, Dan. Let's do it. Again, Dan, paper base is not going to ship out of this. Everything else will. All of your chrome inserts, autos, numbered stuff, all that will. Base, first Parker Messick, first Chandler Simpson, and first of Hunter Barco, first refractors there. Paper base. Those are Jackson Holiday first, and they're very nice. Smart Johnson first. There's a Yellow Lava, Elie de la Cruz, 275 for the Reds. Nice, Ellie. First, Nick York. A little Watson. First, a Elijah Green refractor, nice. First, Walter Ford refractor, and a Alex McFarland. Base, first auto for the Phillies. Again, there's a little dust spec on there. I'll just have Donnie wipe that off really quick. It's right under the first. Dylan Lesko. Let's go. All in Dylan Lesko. First, Lanean Sims, and first of Dylan Ray. A couple of Diamondbacks there. Base. Got Dalton Rushing, Sky Blue Paper 499 for the Dodgers. Kenya Huggins first. Phillies Valerio. First, Alex Freeland. Cesar Prido. We've got True Blue, Walter Ford. Very nice. So 150. Congrats on that one there. Dan. A couple of print lines on there. We'll send the empty box and wrapper with that one. Sorry about that. Still a nice card overall though. Base. It's like the greatest round. Pretty sure he comes back a little. I was going to say, assume that the Don here in Tigers in it, especially in red. Well, I mean, that's the Sunday card anyway. I think this is the one where Garcia puts like two in the water on here. Oh, really? Yeah. He's tied for first going into this. I think he puts one or two balls in the water. Love Sergio, but notable choker. Mikey Romero. He's on that list too. Glad he got, he got a major though. Yeah, he got, I think he's got a master's of these. Jayce Jung first, Refractor. Trey Sweeney and Willem and Diaz. Hey, Base. It's like we got a base auto coming up. Oh, is this at Sawgrass? Yeah. Cool. That's Trevor Martin. Nice one there, two 4.99. He put it in the water. Yeah, he puts one more in there too. Geez. I could be wrong, Will. I haven't seen this turned with like years. Purple Adam Azure, two 250 for the Padres. So there's San Diego, Alan Serta. First, Ryan Ritter, Benny Montgomery and Samuel Zavala. And then we got Bryce Hubbard. Base first auto. Nice one there for the Reds. Congrats on that, Dan. There you go, buddy. Randon Cone. First, Hayden Dunhurst. First, Noah Schultz. And first, the Ben Joyce. Nois Joyce. Nois Joyce. To be fair, that was like forestism right there that I just started using. Oh, he started it? He started Nois Joyce, yes. I thought he did. I know is he hated it. The thing that gets me the most mad is Forrest thought Funkadelic Man was stupid, and then he put it as a video title for him. So a little upset. Yeah, no, I know. First, Chandler Simpson. First, Connor Prillip. And Sterling Thompson, two 12 out of 4.99. First, Refractor Auto 4. The Rockies. There you go, Dan. Congrats, buddy. Hey, I'm base. What's I'm going to say too? Now he said it after too. It was like, yeah, like I said, Funkadelic Funkadelic Man, like during the break, too. I had to go back and watch it. I want to see it so bad. I want to see the was out of like for a rock. Yeah, no, I mean, it was it was worth it. It was understandably so. Yes, a Funkadelic Man. Anthony Gutierrez on the Invicta. I'm not too much pressure there must be, especially after you put one in the water. Jack Brannigan, Benny Montgomery, and William Bergola. Hey, base. Another one in the water. That's why he like got hit across the water.   True blue paper, Walter Ford to 150. That's tough for the mirrors. Oh, black. If the black shimmered is black is out of 71, I believe so. No, 75. Unless it's a black shimmer. If the black shimmer, that's a one of one. But black wave, I believe it's just normal. First, no shields. First, Jared McKenzie. Hold on a second. Give me some more of the chrome. There's like one or two like warped cards in there. Yeah, that's all that make it. Randon Co. First, the Nazir Mule. That's black wave first of trade, Dumprowski, one of one. Wow. There we go, Dan. Congrats, buddy. I thought it was a black shimmer. That was one of one. I guess I was wrong. Heck yeah, we'll take that. Nice one there, buddy. The only time you're happy, you'll probably roll it. Yeah, exactly. Heck yeah, dude. We'll take that all day long. Nice one of one coming your way. Like I said, I will get that magged up for you or Don, you'll get that magged up for you. Congrats. Great way to end the break, I have to say. Fantastic way to end the break. We'll get that right out to you. Thanks again, Dan.


Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage here, live at Reinvent 2022. We're here at the executive summit, upstairs with the Accenture set, three sets broadcasting live, four days with theCUBE. I'm John Furrier, host of Two Great Guests, CUBE alumni's back. Tanuja Randhari, Managing Director, Amazon Web Service for Europe, Middle East and Africa, known as EMEA. Welcome back to theCUBE. Great to see you. And Carter Naran, who's the Accenture first cloud lead. Great to see you. Back again. Thanks for coming back on. All right, so business transformation is all about digital transformation taken to its conclusion. When companies transform, they are now a digital business, technologies powering, value proposition, data security, all in the keynotes, higher level services, industry specific solution. The dynamics of the industry are changing radically in front of our eyes for the better. Karthik, what's your position on this? As Accenture looks at this, we've covered all your successes during the pandemic with AWS. What do you guys see out there now as this next layer of power dynamics in the industry take place? I think cloud is getting interesting and I think there's a general trend towards specialization that's happening in the world of cloud. And cloud is also moving from a general purpose technology backbone to providing specific industry capabilities for every customer within various industries. But the industry cloud is not a new term. It has been used in the past and it's been used in the past in various degrees, whether that's building horizontal solutions, certain specialized SaaS software, or providing capabilities that are horizontal for certain industries. But we see that evolution of industry cloud a little differently and a lot more dynamic, which is we see this as a marketplace where ecosystem of capabilities are going to come together to interact with a common data platform, data backbone, data model with workflows that will come together and integrate all of this stuff and help clients reinvent their industry with newer capabilities, but at the same time use the power of democratized innovation that's already there within that industry. So that's the kind of change we're seeing where customers in their strategy are going to implement industry cloud as one of the tenants as they go through their strategy. Yeah, and I see in my notes fit for purposes of buzzword. People are talking about right size in the cloud and then just building on that. And what's interesting, Thunja, I want to get your thoughts because in the US we're one country, so yeah, integrating is kind of within services. You have purview over countries and these regions as global impact. This is now a global environment, so it's not just the US, North America, it's Latin America, it's EMEA, all your, this is another variable in the cross-connecting of these fit for purpose. What's your view of these industry-specific solutions? Yeah, no, and thanks, Carti, because I'm 100% aligned. I mean, you know this better than me, John, but 90% of workloads have not yet moved to the cloud. And the only way that we think that's going to happen is by bringing together business and IT. So what does that mean? It means starting with business use cases, whether that's digital banking or smart connected factories, or frankly, if it's predictive maintenance or connected beds, but how do we take those use cases, leverage them to really drive outcomes with the technology behind them? I think that's the key unlock that we have to get to. And very specifically, and Adam talked about this a lot today, but data, data is the single unifier for all of business and IT coming together to drive value, right? However, the issue is there's a ton of it, right? In fact, fun fact, if you put all the data that's going to be created over the next five years, which is more than the last 30 years, on a one terabyte little floppy disk drive, remember those? Well, that's going to be 15 round trips to the moon and back, that's how much data it is. So our perspective is you got a unified single data lake, you got a modernized with AI and ML, and then you're going to have to drive innovation on that. Now I'll give you one tiny example, if I may, which I love. Ryanair, big airline, 150 million passengers. They are also the largest supplier of ham and cheese sandwiches in the air. And catering at that scale is really difficult, right? If you have too much, food wastage, sustainability issues, too little, customers are really unhappy. So we work with them leveraging AWS cloud and AI ML to build a Panini predictor. And in essence, it's taking the data they've got, data we've got, and actually giving them the opportunity to have just the right number of Paninis. I love the lock and the key is data to unlock the value. We heard that in the keynote. Karthik, you guys have been working together at AWS and a lot of successes. We've covered some of those on theCUBE. As you look at these industry solutions, they're not the obvious big problems. They're like businesses. Could be the pizza shop. It could be the dentist office. It could be any business, any industry specific carries over. What is the key to unlock that? Is it the data? Is it the solution? What's that key? I think the easier answer is all of the above. But like Tanuja said, it all starts by bringing the data together. And this is a funny thing. It's not creating new data. This data is there within enterprises. Our clients have this data. The industries have the data. But for ages, these data has been trapped in functional silos. And organizations have been doing analytics within those functions. It's about bringing the data together. Whether that's a single data warehouse or a data mesh, those are architectural considerations. But it's about bringing cross-functional data together as step one. Step two is about utilizing the power of cloud for democratized innovation. It's no longer about one company trying to reinvent or create a new wheel within their enterprise. It's about looking around through the power of cloud marketplace to see if there's a solution that's already existing, can we use that? Or if I've created something within my company, can I use that as a service for others to use? So the number one thing is using the power of democratized innovation. Second thing is how do you standardize and digitize functions that does not need to be reinvented every single time? So that your organization can do it or you could use that or take that from elsewhere. And the third element is using the power of the platform economy or platforms to come to find new avenues of revenue, opportunity, customer engagement, and experiences. So these are all the things that differentiates organization, but all of this is underpinned by a unified data model that helps, you know, use all the queries in there. Tanuja, you have mentioned earlier that not everyone has their journey to the cloud, looks the same. And certainly in the U.S. and EMEA, you have different countries and different areas. Their journeys are different. Some want speeds and feeds, some will roll their own. I mean, Databricks CEO and I interviewed him that last week, they started Databricks on a credit card, swiped it, and they didn't want any support.  No, we got it covered. Actually, they're from Berkeley and they're nerds and they're cool, they can roll their own, but not everyone can. And so you have a mix of customer profiles. How do you view that? And what's your strategy? How do you get them over productive, seeing that business value? What's that transformation look like? Yeah, John, you're absolutely right. So you've got those who are born in cloud. They're very savvy, they know exactly what they need. However, what I do find increasingly, even with these digital native customers, is they're also starting to talk business use cases. So they're talking about, okay, how do I take my platform and build a whole bunch of new services on top of that platform? So we still have to work with them on this business use case dimension for the next curve of growth that they want to drive. Currently, with the global macroeconomic factors, obviously they're also very concerned about profitability and cost. So that's one model. In the enterprise space, you have differences. You have the sort of very, very, very savvy enterprises, who know exactly what they're looking for. But for them then, it's about, how do I lean into sustainability? In fact, we did a survey and 77% of the users that we surveyed said that they could accelerate their sustainability goals by using cloud. So in many cases, they haven't cracked that and we can help them do that. So it's really about horses for courses there. And then with some other companies, they've done a lot of the basic infrastructure modernization. However, what they haven't been able to yet do is figure out how they're going to actually become a tech company. So I keep getting asked, can I become a tech company? How do I do that? And then finally, there are companies which don't have the skills. So if I go to the SMB segment, they don't always have the skills or the resources. And there, using scalable platforms like AWS Marketplace, allows them to get access to solutions without having to have all the capabilities. So really is. This is where the partner network really kind of comes in. Absolutely. Huge value. Having that channel of solution providers, I use that term specifically because you're providing the solution for those folks. And then the folks, the enterprise, we had a quote on the analyst segment earlier on RQ, spend more, save more. That's the cloud equations because you're going to get it on sustainability. You're going to save on cost recovery for revenue, time to revenue. So the cloud is the answer for a lot of enterprises out of the recession. Absolutely. And in fact, we need to lean in now. You heard Adam say this, right? I mean, the cost savings potential alone from on-prem to cloud is between 40% and 60%. Just that. But I don't think that's it, John. The bell time that he said is, rain in some right size, but then also do more. He didn't say that, but analysts are generally saying, if you spend right on the cloud, you'll save more. That's the general thesis. You agree with that? I absolutely think so. And by the way, usage is, people use it differently as they get smarter. We're constantly working with our customers, by the way, to continuously cost optimize. So you heard about our Graviton3 instances, for example. We're using that to constantly optimize, but at the same time, one of the workloads that you haven't yet brought over to the cloud. And so supply chain is a great idea. Our health cloud initiative. So we worked with Accenture, on the Accenture Health Insights platform, which runs on AWS as an example, or the Goldman Sachs one last year, if you remember. I do. The financial cloud. So those are some of the things that I think make it easier for people to consume cloud and reimagine their businesses. It's funny, I was talking with Adam, and we had a little debate about what an ISV is. And I talked to the CEO of Mongo. They don't see themselves on the ISV. As they grow up on cloud, they become platforms. They have their own ISVs, and Databricks, and Snowflake, and others are developing that dynamic, but there's still ISVs out there. So there's a dynamic of growth going on, and the need for partners, and our belief is that the ecosystem is going to start doubling in size, we believe, because of the demand for purpose built, or out of the box, I hate to use that word out of the box, but turnkey solutions, that you can buy another one if it breaks, but use the building blocks if you want to build the foundation, that's more durable, more customizable. Do that if you can. Well, we've got a phenomenal, shall we talk about this? Yeah, go get it. So we've built a five-year vision together, Accenture and us, which is called Velocity. And you'll be much, much better in describing it, but I'll give you the simple version of Velocity, which is taking AWS-powered industry solutions and bringing it to market faster, more repeatable, and at lower cost. And so think about vertical solutions sitting on a horizontal accelerator platform able to be deployed, making transformation less complex. Karthik, weigh in on this, because I've talked to you about this before, we've said years ago, the horizontal scalability of the cloud's a beautiful thing, but vertical is where the ML works great too. Now you got ML in all aspects of it. Horizontal vertical is here now. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Again, the power of this kind of platform that we are launching, by the way, we're launching tomorrow, we are very excited about it. It's... What are you launching tomorrow? Hold on, I got news out there. What's launching? We are going to launch a giant platform which will help clients accelerate the journey to industry cloud. So that's going to happen tomorrow. So what this platform would provide is that this is going to provide the horizontal capabilities that will help clients bootstrap their launch into cloud. And once they get into cloud, they would be able to build industry solutions on this. The way I imagine this is create the chassis that you need for your industry and then add the cartridges, industry cartridges, which are going to be solutions that are going to be built on top of it. And we're going to do this across various industries, starting from healthcare life sciences, to energy, to public services, and so on. You're going to create a channel machine, channel creation machine.  And that's launching tomorrow. I'll make sure we get the news on that. Exactly. And, sorry, just... And we genuinely believe the power of industry cloud, if you think about it in the past, to create a solution, one had to be an ISV to create a solution. What cloud is providing for industry today in the concept of industry cloud is, industry companies are creating industry solutions. The best example is, along with AWS and Accenture, EcoPetrol, which is a leader in the energy industry, has created a platform called Water Intelligence and Management Platform. And through this platform, they are going attacking the audacious goal of water sustainability, which is going to be a huge problem for humanity that everybody needs to solve. As part of this platform, the goal is to reduce, you know, fresh water usage by 66% or zero, you know, impact to, you know, ground water is going to be the goal or ambition of EcoPetrol. So all of this is possible because industry players want to jump to the bandwagon because they have all the toolkit of the cloud that's available with which they could build a software platform with which they can power their entire industry. And make money on, have a good business. You guys are doing great. Final word, partnership, where's it go next? You're doing great. Put a plug in for the Accenture AWS partnership. Well, I mean, we have a phenomenal relationship and partnership, which is amazing. We really believe in the power of three, which is the GSI, the ISV and us together. And I have to go back to the thing I keep focused on. 90% of workloads, not in cloud. I think together, we can enable those companies to come into the cloud, very importantly, start to innovate, launch new products and refuel the economy. So I think very, very optimistic. We'll have to check on that number. You got to check on that number. 90 seems a little bit of, maybe that sounds, maybe that, I'd be surprised. Maybe a little bit lower than that. Maybe we'll see. We got to start turning it. It's still a lot. It's still a lot. A lot more, still early days. Thanks so much for the conversation. Thank you. We'll see you again. Tanuja, thanks for your time. Congratulations on your success. Okay, this is theCUBE up here in the executive summit. You're watching theCUBE. The leader in high tech coverage. We'll be right back more with more coverage here on the Accenture set after this short break.


Hi everyone, Joe for jaspyscasebrakes.com coming at you with 2021 Panini prism football. Three box random team break number five from a fresh case as well. Big thanks to this group for making it happen, appreciate it. All 32 teams are in and let's roll it and randomize it two and a one three times for names and teams one, two and three. We've got Jose down to Kevin after three times three times for the teams one, two and three. We've got the Browns down to the Texans after three times and we're going to try to bring the heat in this in this break Brian.  All right so we're going to pause the video and allow a little bit of a window for trades and when we come back we'll see if there's any trades and then we will have the break. Stick around we'll be right back. All right welcome back ladies and gentlemen, a little bit of trade chatter but no deals were done here on Sunday, June the 5th and random team break number five. Thanks everyone for making this happen, appreciate it, the list remains the same, appreciate everybody getting in. Here's the fresh case of prism football, let's pop this open and let's see which three boxes we're going to do. All right so we have four stacks of three, we'll go one, two, three, four on the dice roll and if I roll five or six we'll just roll again. We'll go with that die right there, four, one, two, three, four, we'll do this far left column right here, let's get these out of the way. All right so this is my first live look at prism football so this should be pretty fun. We're getting two autos a box, a lot of parallels, a lot of fun stuff, possibilities at some really short printed cards and whatnot so at long last prism football has arrived. All right Joe and David, relax guys, let's have a chill Sunday. It's a different feel to the prism this year, different packaging, different bit of wax right here, it's a different design, saw someone pull a stained glass burrow, Diego saying nice, a lot of short print possibilities, nice clean look to the prism this year, is that a different finish on the card? There's a different finish to it or something like that, I don't know, I like it. There's Chase Edmonds and our first autograph is gonna be Nico Collins, Texans, 58 out of 149, red wave autograph for the Texans that's gonna go to Kevin. Tyler what's going on? Some of these cards right side up, upside down, we got to 175, Brian Dawkins, we got Russell Gage 7 out of 15, nice low number on that card. Tyler what's going on, how are you? That is for Patrick and the Falcons, got a Blake Jarwin to 149, got a Michael Gallop to 225, I'm doing well Tyler, I'm doing well. Ooh nice Mac Jones, 172.25, purple cracked ice for the Patriots, Derek got randomized the Pats, nice one, Eric Ebron, Silver, Mike Allsdott to 249, Tyree Kill still Chiefs edition here to 99, TJ Hawkinson to 249, 121 out of 149, Ben Skaronik, we got Chief Smith to 249 for the Panthers and we got a Dante Hall Chiefs autograph, that'll be for Jeffrey, got randomized the Chiefs, this Chief Smith will go to Michael and the Panthers, got a Sean Taylor to 199, blue wave going to Terry and the Commanders. Alright nice start, box one, here's a second box. Kevin if you don't mind me asking if you can share, what do you do that where you work in 12 to 14 hours a day without a day off since early May? That's crazy, take some time off for yourself. Oh I gotcha, you're a buyer for the large flower shop wholesaler in Hawaii, flowers do well in Hawaii I would imagine. Box two, got a Russell Gage to 199 for the Falcons, that'll be for Patrick, nice Zach Wilson going to Brian and the Jets, let's see if we can find some parallels for this guy, nice Chase Edmonds with my Raiders now, still Cardinals edition, got a Sean Alexander to 249, we got Chris Herndon the fourth to 99, and we got an Austin Hooper to 175 for the Browns, nice yeah take some time, Kevin after the after graduation season, Trey Nixon Orange to 249 that's for the Patriots, Derrick, Drew Bledsoe for the Patriots to 199 and a Fred Warner, Purple Cracked Ice to 225, yeah I think it's low 70s out here in Hermosa Beach which is quote-unquote a little warm for the area, actually not that one, it's about average but I think it's going to get warmer, it's gonna get mid to high 70s which will be a heatwave for this area, nice Trevor Lawrence going to Jeffrey and the Jags, Baker Mayfield to 225 for the Browns and a rookie Silver Anthony Schwartz also for the Browns, there's Barry Sanders and Adam yeah high 70s it's going to be crazy, instead of a shorts t-shirt and a hoodie a light hoodie we may have to leave the hoodie at home, that's how crazy that weather is going to be, I might have to say indoors Diego you're right, beat the heat, we got Amari Rogers 8 out of 99 for the Packers, rookie Blue Cracked Ice and rookie Otto, Raven Jordan, Texans that'll be for Kevin, there's a different feel to these cards here, Mark Brinnell, Johnathan Taylor, I don't know if they're using a different material, I mean it's just a flatter design, I don't know, something, I don't know, bad way just it's just different, two out of 49 Johnathan Taylor for the Colts, that'll be for Kevin Smith, the Mark Brinnell will be for Jeffrey and the Jags, some parallels here, Javon Curse to 149, Christian McCaffrey to 149 and a Drew Bledsoe franchise legends autograph and that's to 75, there's to 175, Sean Alexander, there's Rondale Moore to 125 and a kid reporter card and a lockdown, I don't know if this is a short print or not but let's seal it, a lot of these those inserts, no Patrick, never, alright third and final box, good luck, the next three box break in the store already, jaspyscasebrakes.com, check it out, out of 175 Randy Moss, it's for the Vikings, that's gonna go to Sean Maddock, Kyle Pitts, Trevor Lawrence, points, which will randomize to one person in the break, that does take the place of the live auto, Deandre Hopkins to 225, Quinn Mineres to a 75, Nick Bosa to 99, no there really is no clock, you just have to be active just before, I'm just gonna hit the button whenever and whoever gets it gets it, not really being time specific about it, it's Pat Tillman to 199, Barry David, I mean unless Brian it takes the place of a bad auto, right, it's Karim Hunt to 225, Derek Carr Silver, oh nice, that's really cool, that's Patrick Mahomes, I think this is really short printed, is this the manga hit, that's pretty awesome, it's a super short print, that is for Jeffrey in Kansas City, nice, what are those going for on the secondary market, people are saying that's one in every 12 cases, Matt Lehmann saying that's what, 15,000 plus, there's Jamal Adams to 249, and there's Kyle Trask, rookie auto silver for the Buccaneers, Jimmy with the Bucs, the Brady's going for 15, maybe the Mahomes, maybe a little bit less than that, nice Kyle Trask though to 75, Akeem Hicks, Tommy Trembel to 225, Devin White lockdown, and a kid reporter card, gotcha, Anthony is saying two have sold for three and a half and five respectively, that's pretty awesome, what a hit, all right now let's give away, not giveaway, but let's randomize the points to somebody, so a new dice, new list, let's gather everybody's names, and let's roll and randomize it, Snake Eyes, two times, top name after two, one, two, and that's going to be for Michael, Michael G with the 600 points going your way, I'm Joe for JaspeysCaseRakes.com, thanks for watching, thanks for breaking with us, I will see you next time for the next one, bye.


This video compares a corporation's two organizational documents, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. Articles of Incorporation Articles of Incorporation, also called a Certificate of Incorporation or Charter in some states, must be filed with the State Regulator. This step imbues the corporation with legal personality.


Hello, everyone. What's going on? We're back. We're back. Hi. And Finnegan's back, too. Yes. Yay, you lose camera cam. And the same squad since, like, Friday morning. No, he's rotated. He's the opposite direction from this morning. There he is. Hey, Finn. Finn. Say hi. And again. Hey. Hello. Oh, hi.  Aw. I think we woke him up. Sorry, buddy. He's getting up. Oh, stretchers, big stretchers. I have my tension. Yes, Chris. We've sunk to the, to now having our own pet cams during the live. I don't have a pet cam right now, but. I have a camera cam. There's Kara. OK. Oh, now he's posing. He's got his hero pose going. Oh, look at that. Look at that. OK. Well, so we don't get totally distracted there. We'll just hide Finnegan for now. We'll come. We'll check in on him at the end after.  She's ready. Where's Molly? She's right here. She's buzzing at something outside. That's a wiki tree. Put it on the camera and everybody will be watching them the whole, the whole hour. Are you folks doing, you're getting lots of, lots done? No, but. No. The plastic that this afternoon was my time. And it wasn't. Not yet, but after this. Right. You still have more afternoon left. I do. Oh, OK. OK. Oh, Molly. Molly has a strong opinion. Molly is very passionate about connecting and collaboration. Oh, that's good. Oh, look what Chris said about RitzTech. Hey, Eileen. Hey. Oh, a new volunteer here. Oh, cool. Yeah, I think she just moved there, if I remember right. Excellent. Lamer family. Judy Bramwich, I will send you a message. Excellent. That's good. Wow, we've got lots of people. We've got 74 people in the chat. So hello to everyone. I know Mags likes to say hi to every single person. But that's just a lot of names. Christina Root, Darren, Eric, Lallesh, and Chris, Maggie, Wendy. Wendy? Wendy. Wendy, Wendy Allen. Karen, Lisa, Chris, Judy, Stephanie, both Cherry. OK, I'm kidding. Yoke. There's too many. Lisa, Tanita, Lots, John, Steven, and Debbie. OK, I'm scrolling so fast. I'm missing lots of names, Patti. Anyways. Wolf, Wolf. No, that was a name. Oh, that was a comment. What? Anyways, yes. And smash that button, as Anne had said. That's good. Steven, you're making some progress. You're connecting? Me, yeah. Yeah, I'm pushing through. I've connected this Bowdoin Dive family. I'm just looking at this chart here. So the Bowdoin Dive is splitting off into the Fagas, splitting off into the Reuters, splitting off into the Oldenburgs, and then that really deep stuff I'm finding with the Oldenburgs, getting back to 1700s now, into some pre-existing profiles that were already on Wiki Tree. So don't get credit for connecting into those. But I've done a lot of fleshing in of this Bowdoin Dive family out of Wisconsin. And that's pretty much what I've been focusing on for the last day is just getting all these little branches spread out. And then my actual CC7 has increased as a result of this work because they're all within six to seven degrees of me. So nice. That's great news. Wow, yeah. Chris, you're working on relative, sir. Your CC7 must be going up, too, right? Oh, yeah. Well, specifically, my dad's CC7. I'm out of Cheswaldo finally. Now, I'm in Vicenta, which is a town just like just outside the city. Triangle of town. Cheswaldo, Vicenta. Guadalajara. That's the point of this little triangle. So everybody intermarries between everybody in those town. So I'm finally in Vicenta.  They're like Capo Bianco's marrying from Miglietti's. Miglietti's marrying Marconi's. Marconi's marrying Capo Bianco's. And I know, Molly. I know. Molly's like, tell them about that other family. Tell them about that other family. Tell them about that line. Yeah.  I'm not sure. Amy joined us. Hi. Hi there, my fellow Canadian. How are you? Good. My puppy's eating. Molly has strong opinions today. Have you been getting lots of connecting done, Amy? No. I missed the window. I'm sorry, I missed it. I'm sorry to get to sign up for a team this time. Oh, well, you're helping us out. I'm cheering everybody else on. Yeah. Yes. Well, I fell into the French Canadian hold. The same French Canadian rabbit hole that I've been in since Friday. And, but I've fallen into an adjacent one. And I have to thank Lisa's your va for this. Because I was adding a Joseph, a Joseph cloutier. And I did a search to make sure I wasn't duplicating. But you know, I knew that he had cloutier that Lisa had added. This is one of your profiles, Lisa, but he had no parents. So once I ... So he now has a full ancestry all the way back to the foundation. Because I had parents and grandparents. Some others been all of a sudden, boom. He's he's got a nice solid ancestry there. So yes, I love it when it goes from the just, you know, just either nothing or just parent, father and toe that full the fire fighters died in Arizona. All 19 profiles and two are connected to the tree. Oh, wow. Check that out. Shonda also said she increased her CC seven by 171 so far. Very impressive. That's impressive. Mm hmm. Very cool. Are you ever going to connect to existing profile unless it's my own because I'm also a profile for when I see it. I'm like, oh, wow. Okay. I got caught. This guy doesn't mind me brushing off the profile a little bit. They're there. They just don't really act. Okay, so before we get into the stats, there is a secret word that has to be typed in. So, Chris, what's this all about? Well, I'll say the secret word. The ducks will come down. The word is we keep you free towards. Yes, it's actually more of a phrase than a word. You need both words. Wicked free space tours. This space is important. It doesn't work without the second half right now. Type that in and what do they win? A win? They wins. There'll be some options from our store and they'll be able to pick something from that. Excellent. It'll be very cool. Very exciting. You don't even get a lousy copy of our home game.  No. I'm just putting down part L. Oh, Chris understands where I'm coming from. I'm not sure I do, but that's okay. Don't even get the rice oroni the San Francisco treat. Oh, the rice oroni. Oh, yes. Oh, God, because he was the voice of Jeopardy for like back in the 80s and everything in there. Okay. Well, there you go. Yeah, I made a fun song about losing on that show. Yeah. And there's a Julie. I keep talking. Hey, Julie. Hi. Where is she? Rika's on it. Oh, there you are. Oh, in the middle. I'm really great. You're hiding. Did I already miss all the stats or just the histogram? Oh, no, I was just about to start the stats. Oh, yeah. Yes, we were just probably broke me. So, I'm great. We were distracted by the fin cam. Oh, different pets and other things. Two more pets need cams and then we can have Brady Bunch. That's right. Well, if I had him, I'd do it, but mine won't sit still that long. I have too many. So, you do. You have a lot.   Oh, my gosh. Oh, no. Well, so we've got lots of stats here. Um, did you guys hear an echo when I'm talking or no? No. Okay. Okay. I think there's a little bit of a sound coming out of the fin cam. I've got it down as low as possible, but as long as you're not hearing it that I'm fine. Um, it's muted. Yeah. Okay. Good. Uh, so before we start, before we started, we were at 77,753. Um, it'd be lovely if I refresh and it goes to 7777. Wouldn't that be wonderful? It's so good. That would be cool. It would be beautiful. It's so cool. It's so hot. It's over 1228 right now, but it's a great number that you would like at noon. Yeah. What's the number? So, yesterday when Darren was on, he said that we should do some stats with prime numbers. So, I thought that would be kind of cool. And so, I found this handy little thing. So, I mean, there's lots of prime numbers and unlike the Fibonacci numbers that get larger and larger. So, you know, there's only a, there's a fairly, I mean, infinite sequence, but there's a smallish number that so you can actually do something decent with it. With prime numbers, however, there's prime numbers all over the place and we just couldn't read every single prime number off or else we would be here forever. So, um, one cool thing about prime numbers is that prime numbers also all, not always, but often come in pairs. So, and what I mean by that is they're only off by two. So, for example, the very, um, the very first prime number is two, which is the only even prime number and then three is the next one and then five. So, a prime number, in case you forget, a prime number is one that does, that has no other factors except one and itself. So, four is not a prime number because four can be made up as two times two, but five can't be made up into, with whole numbers can't, you can only multiply one times five to get five. So, that's why five is a prime number. But so, three and five are off, are off by two, five and seven are off by two and then you get higher numbers like 41 and 43. Those are both prime numbers and they're only two apart. So, those are called prime pairs because they like pairs or like buddies that go side by side. Um, so, what I thought would be kind of cool is if we look at, um, if we, uh, look at the teams and we will find the highest prime number pair per team. So, okay, so we're doing it by teams, not by individual. Uh, well, you know what do we have? Uh, we could, let's switch to individuals. Okay. Are you going through places or are you going for contributions? Oh, I was, ooh, let's see if we go to my user here.  Oh, let's see. Well, let's, let's look at contributions. See how many prime, how long, how many prime pairs in the contributions. Okay. So, so Steve, you're going to have to help me out here and be a second pair. I'm following it. This 884 just missed that 883. Look at that. Oh, we're going to count it, right? Uh-huh. Yeah, but oh, 850. Yeah, so 884, that was really cool. So that's Emma. Emma. Emma, Beth, way to go. 857 is one. And then 857 is a prime there. So that's John, John Powers from the Appalachia Roots. Yep. Excellent. Uh, let's see. 29 would be the next one. 889, 659. Ooh, look at, okay, 660 is right in between two prime pairs. So we're going to count that one. Yeah. So that's Maddie Hardman from the Mighty Oaks. Plimos. There we go. 641, 670. Oh, 617. There we go. Funny. That is Kylie Fowler from the Kiwi Crew. Did you know, Kylie, that you've got a prime number of contributions so far? 599 is also. Look at that. Excellent. Okay, so that's Al Thompson from the Splendid Spruces. Okay, going 549. What's next? I need some outside of the area. 569. 521. Nope. 461. Oh, we've got 455 with Joan Whitaker, but that's not there. Let's move down. We'll get a lot closer. 434 probably is the closer. 434. Yeah, because the 430 is 433. 433 is a prime number. So one more than a prime number is Gail G. Martin from the Appalachian. And that's a palindrome too. It is a palindrome. Gotta love that. Excellent. Yes. That's very cool. Then we got 419. We've got, oh yeah, so 14. We've got two riding the 420, so they've got a prime number on each side of them. That would be Pat Brunson from the Cornbread Catchers and Mike Patek from Appalachia Roots. Release it. And then 348 would be in the middle. 348's are right down the middle. Right down the middle of another prime pair. Okay, that's Nan Starjak from the captain of the Southern Super Sweepers and Carolyn Schoenberg from the Germany Genies. Yes, Carolyn. Is that how you pronounce first name, Carolyn? I'm gonna assume so. Okay. We just chat on Discord. We don't actually, you don't actually even like use our names. So I'm trying to say we text everything. 311, 313 is the next pair. So 314's pretty close. Yeah, it's just one more. So that's Bonnie McFeeters from Appalachia Roots. 281 to 283. We got a 283. We have it. Oh, look at that. 283 that in the 64th position overall. Catherine Ryan from the Splendid's Bruce's. Good stuff. Okay. 269, 271. We're just outside of that with 274 here. Yeah. The 239, 241 pair. We have a 242. And we have a 239. Oh, we do have a 239. 239. In the nine squared position overall is Nelda Inspires from the Toddlin tortoises. Right. There we go. 227, 229. We have both 229 and 227's doubled. Look at that. Okay. So we've got a run of prime numbers here. Connie, Connie J. Goose from the Germany Genies. Carol Alterner, also known as Beckett from the Wizards of Oz, Maggie L. N. from Legacy Heirs, and Lorna L. Hellman from the Mighty Oaks. You're in the prime of this contest. That's excellent. It's a nice cluster. And then we got 197, 199 to look for. We do have a 199. We do have a nine. Okay. And I'm just going to slide this up so I can make it new. Okay. So that's Cindy K. Stevens from the Western Red Cedars. That's Azure's team. Nice. Way to go, Cindy. Julie Bartimus is right in between the two. Oh, look at that. Yes. Bartimus from Northwest Terriers. Thanks. 191, 193. We have two of them that are 193s and we have a couple of 192s. Yeah. Okay. So at the 193, the prime number there is Brad R. Jones from the Southern Cross Stars, Axel Spencer from the Nordic War, and then really close and probably we'll eventually we'll get to 193 very shortly. It would be Katherine Bauer from the Trinots, Mary Gilkerson from Team Virginia, and Captain Lisa from the Legacy Airs. Nice. Let's go to 179 and 181. We got some 180s. We got 180s. Okay. Karen L. Anderson from the Mighty Oaks and Victoria Faulkner from the Legacy Airs. Okay. 149 and 151. Okay. Oh, we have a one. We have a 49. That's Forrest C. Dimon from the Canadian Connectors. Hey, Amy, where'd it go? Your team. 137s and 139s. We have both Ladoes and 138s. We're ready to go. So we'll just we'll just read off all those names. Roy S. Lamberton from the Nor'easters. Amanda L. Allardice from the Trinots. Is that how you pronounce it? I think so. Okay. Matt. I only read it. I have it after. It sounds good though. It sounds good, eh? Okay. Matt D. McNap from Kiwi Crew, Air, Air, P. Mushkins, Mushkins, gosh. From the Northwest Territory, Territories. They're really Northwest Territories in Canada, but this is the Northwest Terriers. From Minnesota. All right. Next, we got down to the 107, 109 pair. Okay. I'm gonna skip a lot of people here. Okay, but we do have 107s. We got a pair of 107s. Rodney Wong from the Legacy Airs and Debbie Cravens from the Nor'easters. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. 101 and 103 pair. Oh, we got lots of those. Uh, Diane D. Jordan from the Cornbridge catchers. Mindy, Mindy Silva. Mindy. From Team Virginia. Captain Team Virginia. Katie Barker from Mighty Oaks. Denise Hunch from Twisted Thistles. Heather M. Jitkinson from Splendid Spruces. Um, Andy Massey from Team Virginia. And Yoke Van Vendemvel. Uh, Venendal. Vendemvel. Line Dutchman. Okay, let's move down to 71, 73. Okay. Sorry for those on getting, I'm giving vertical two, but there we go. So, Cindy L. Hanrahan from the Little Team on the Prairie is on, is in the prime with 73. In between is Susan Campbell with Twisted Thistles with 72. And then Robert Ekman from Team Atlantic, U.S. Elizabeth Marsh from Nor'easters, Patricia Rye from Appalachia Roots, and Sue M. Wyatt from the Toglin Tortoise. They all have 71. Okay. Uh, we have the 59, 61 pair. Okay. Well, and we got, oh, once you're reading off, you're gonna be doing. Oh, no. Oh, no. Now the numbers are huge. So, we have Claire Susie Jadrat, Barbara, Lou, Donna, Jane, Richard, Angela. Uh, well, actually those first ones all had 61. Then the one straddling fence there are Jane, Richard, Angela, Lorely, Pat. And then at 59, another prime is David, David, Judy, Judy, who, anyone's gonna get to meet. Um, Angela, and I think that's it. Well, David was actually a 60, but we're still counting. Oh, sorry. Okay, there. Well, he'll probably, he'll get 61 soon. 41, 43. Uh, oh my, whatever. Oh, there's only a few. Okay. So in 43, we have Robin Baker from Appalachia Roads, Bonnie from, uh, Bonnie from Northwest Terriers. No, we can't say it. Uh, Super Roz and Judy, each husted from the Team Atlantic. Uh, Judy Brett from Team Mid-Atlantic US. And then jumping down to 41. Sorry, guys in the middle. Um, Ugo Boni from Team Italy. Dave Carlson from the Canyon Connectors as along with Michelle Matiu. I think I just created a record for Michelle Matiu, but, you know, he was born in the 1800s, so I'm pretty sure it's not the same guy. Um, and, uh, Kathleen Cobcroft from Wizards of Oz and I, let's see. I'll read the 42s if you don't want to, because that's a special number too. It is a special number. That is right.  You read the 42s. Yeah, I'll get the 42s. So, here we go. Uh, Kathy A. Seed from the Irish Chanchet. Um, Mary I Fawatt from the Twisted Thistles. Carolyn Cross from the Nor'easters and Valerie Penner from the Nordic Moir. All are the answer right now. They know the, what the answer is life, universe. What is the question? What was the question? Yeah, that's right. The question is doctor who? Okay, 29 and 31 fair. Oh, my goodness. You want to split? I'll take one. You take the other. Okay. Are you guys getting, are you guys sorry this is the route you chose? Yeah. Okay. I'm just going, I'm going first names only at this point. First name only.  But congratulations. All the same. Um, Linda, Jenny, Mary, Gina, Maria and S. O. Tool. And you take it away for, and Suzanne, I think Suzanne's also 31. Okay. Who's on the 30s? Uh, the 30s are Deb, Don, Patricia, Sheena, and Eve. Okay. I'm hanging in at 29. And the 29s are Heather, Tracy. Oh, you there. Me. You. Edward, Molly. Oh, another Molly. Uh, Sandra. Hey, Murphy. And last one is a Murphy. Lisa Martin. And Greg have math regret yet. I lost track. 17 and 19 now.  Oh, my name. Hey, I might be in here. Okay. Let me see. Okay. The last, I just gonna put my cursor on the last one so I know where to stop. Marshall, Linda, Scott, Lisa, Robert, Alexandra, Dreama, Jeff, Journey, Gurney and Roy. Okay. The 18s are Joan, Norma, Michelle, Jackie, Tracy, Sharon, Emily Rex, Charles, Denise, and Jeffery, and Karen, 18. Okay. Nice. And then the 17s are going to, let's see. I think, yeah. The 17s are Dorothy, Chris, Steve. Yay, Steve. Um, Lea, Paulo, and Rob. Okay, 11 and 13. At the bottom of the list.  Oh, my goodness. Okay. So going across, I think, there we go. Jacqueline, Nick, Michelle. It's only 325. It's no problem.  Robert, David, Yana and V. Okay. And then the 12s and number 12s are Sherry, Philip, Kristi, Greg. Okay. Rosemary, Lea, Jean, Paula. Where's the cutoff here? Valeri, Betsy, and I think Linda is the last 12. All right. Okay. And then, you know, they're not very good. It is hard to see. And then we have 411s, Vicki, Bonnie, Nicole, and Franz. And I think we're going to stop at the two digits of the prime numbers.   But anyways, congrats to everyone. You know who you are. You know who you are. You're all the prime people in our lives for connecting and doing all this hard work. I am Optimus Prime. Optimus Prime. Okay. We have 70 entries, though, to get it. Oh, wow. Okay. If you haven't entered, if you haven't started, if you haven't started, what were you doing? Well, we were just typing. Oh, I was watching the chat. Oh, anyways, and I'm just saying that I'm not in your math skills. Okay. We ready for the draw? Yeah. Duh, duh, duh, duh, bah, bah, bah, bah. And we're done. And we're done. Congratulations. That's great. We can stop the ticker tape now. Congratulations. There's a lot of people. Because it's too late. You can type what you want, but you're not going to win anymore. All right, Ellen. Congratulations, Lorna. So, Aynwin will contact you. Contact, contact it. Will contact you. In the future, not in the past.  Oh, there we go. Well, we have a few comments and questions. Should we go through them one at a time? Yeah, we'll do that. Good job on the job. Okay, great. Just a comment. Prime numbers are called primos in Spanish, and primos equals cousins. So, prime numbers are very important to our tree. Excellent. That's an excellent, an excellent point. Thanks, Vicki. Yeah. That's right. Primos. Primos. This is not related. John said he added a centenarian who lived at 104 and just died in this century. Oh, wow. So, she's straddled three centuries then. She's born in the 1897. Yeah. Is that crazy? That is, wow, that is really neat. Sean commented. Oh, sorry, Chris. I like that. Sean commented, too, is the odd, because it's the only one that's even. No, but it's odd. But it's odd. It's odd because it's odd. And then we actually have a question. She's added, Chris has added over 100 profiles and connected at least two floating branches, but her CC7 has only increased by 36. Is that because she's working on her puppy's side? I'm going to say yes. How many connected into existing profiles? Because if you created brand new ones without existing connections, you would expect to see more points. It's not points she's concerned about. It's her CC7. Oh, right. Yeah. So, I'm guessing that there's some overlap in your branches. And if what you're doing is what increased your CC7, I mean, let me back up a step. Additions that other people are making might also be affecting your CC7. Does that make sense? So, Chris, whatever you're doing might be affecting your CC7, but it also might be coming from other numbers. And if you are working on your husband's side. I approach it differently. Maybe she's like attaching it at eight degrees or nine degrees away, so they're not counting towards CC7. Yeah, that could be. Yeah, that could be. Yeah, he could just be just far away. Yeah. Okay. And Judy says it takes a day, but is that true during our thongs? I think it was every 30 minutes that it gets updated. Yeah. I thought just during the thongs we did that. Where's Aless? Aless was here. He's here. I saw him. Christine Miller said she started a page for firefighters who died in Yarnel, Arizona and got all 19 of them connected to the... Wait, got all 19 of them in and two of them connected to the three, so that's great. That's good. Well done. And Aless says it is 30 minutes. It is 30 minutes. Cool. Thanks, Amy. You're welcome. Let's see. Oh, another question. Lynette put in two duplicates for mergers. Does that count for anything? I don't think so. Because I don't think they count during the connected thong, right, Amy? I don't think so. Emma had said in the comments earlier, I noticed that she was doing a lot of merging, so that's good for the tree. Yeah, it is definitely. It'll increase people's CC 7s potentially. And then Amanda says, what did I miss about Allardice? Oh, I was trying to pronounce it. I don't know if I said I. So I said it is pronounced like dice. Oh, OK. Good. Oh, so that was it. That's it. Excellent. I've earned my spot today. Well, thank you very much, Julie, because of course, I was totally ignoring the comments while we were trying to read the names just came through. Yeah, that's what I remember in the future, where we'll just do it by rank and not by number of profiles. Yes, yes, that's right. That was a plan. All right, let's let the 86 people who are watching get back to connect. Let them get back to connect. Oh, my goodness. Oh, is everybody OK? I must have been Amy's. I'm afraid to look. She has a lot of puppies running around. Oh, my goodness. Well, thank you for everyone who came and joined us and stuck with us out, but enjoy the rest you're connecting. And in three and a half hours, we'll be back here. Or some people will be back here with another live. See you. Bye.


Hello, my name is Daniel Evans and I'm a Programme Scientist in NASA's Science Mission Directorate. This is a re-recording of a virtual community town hall that we held on March 3rd, 2020 to discuss NASA's Science Mission Directorate's implementation of dual anonymous peer review. On March 3rd, I was joined by two SMD leaders, Dr. Thomas Debucham, the Associate Administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate and Dr. Michael New, the Deputy Associate Administrator for Research. During the town hall, we asked anybody to submit any questions using the following link and later in this presentation, I will actually go back and review some of the most frequently submitted questions. Let me start by saying that NASA's Science Mission Directorate is strongly committed to ensuring that the review of proposals is performed in an equitable and fair manner that reduces the impacts of any unconscious biases. And so to this end, and motivated by an extremely successful study conducted for the Hubble Space Telescope, the Science Mission Directorate is conducting a pilot program in Rosers 2020 to evaluate proposals using dual anonymous peer review. Now under the system, not only it proposes unaware of the identities of the members of the review panel, but those reviewers themselves do not have explicit knowledge of the identities of the proposing team during the scientific evaluation of the proposal. This webinar covers four main subjects. Number one, we'll begin by introducing exactly what is dual anonymous peer review before moving on to discuss which programs are converting to dual anonymous peer review. Then we'll be discussing how exactly the proposing community can go about making their proposals compliant with this new method. And then finally discuss how proposals will be reviewed under the auspices of dual anonymous peer review. Let's start off with the motivation. What exactly is dual anonymous peer review? SMD is strongly committed to developing an excellent workforce, both within NASA and also within our extra mirror community. We have started a whole host of measures to develop the workforce. And one important technique that we're doing to do just that is dual anonymous peer review. I wanted to pay credit to the pioneering work performed by the Hubble Space Telescope team in implementing and standing up dual anonymous peer review. And indeed it's from Hubble that I'm showing the following plot. This is data from the Hubble Space Telescope for each of its annual call for proposals over the past dozen or so years. And you can see the inferred male PI success rate exceed slightly the inferred female PI success rate year after year after year. It's like flipping a coin and coming up with the heads 12 times in a row. And so that motivated the Hubble team to switch to dual anonymous peer review in cycle 26 and cycle 27 that you can see there on the right. The implementation of dual anonymous peer review first resulted in a slightly higher success rate in inferred female PI proposals. In 27 that train was actually flipped, but their data from their most recent mid cycle review shows that the parity exists between genders. In other words, it was a 43% success rate for inferred male PI and a 43% success rate for inferred female PI. But gender as course is one of the many, many parameters of diversity that we wish to think about. And it may mainly represent the tip of the iceberg. So what else are we missing to move further? This is a part of the success rate by institution type for roses programs in the National Science Mission Directorate pilot. You can see that government contractors, federal government, research one universities all have in excess of a 20% success rate for their proposals. But take a look at research to universities or minority serving institutions, the success rate declines dramatically. But I wanted to point out that one of the main motivations for moving to dual anonymous peer review is to the level the playing field for everyone. I should point out that dual anonymous peer review is not completely a blind process, however. And in that sentimentation of dual anonymous peer review, we require that our proposing community submit two documents. The first one is an anonymized proposal. The second one is a not anonymized expertise and resources document. And here that latter document allows the proposing team to demonstrate why exactly it has the qualifications experience resources that will make the execution of the proposed investigation successful. I'm showing now some feedback from the Hubble panelists. I just wanted to note Rachel Somerville's remarks. She was the chair of the cycle 27 Hubble Time Allocation Committee. And Somerville noticed that several time allocation members themselves noted that they felt the discussions at both the panel level and at the time allocation committee level to more collegial. That's emotionally charged and previous tax, perhaps because either positive or negative feelings about the people involved in the proposal were largely removed. Let's move on. This is a program to converting to dual anonymous peer review in NASA's raises 2020 pilot. We have selected for programs to be performed under dual anonymous peer review. One from each SMD division. We have the astrophysics data analysis program, otherwise known as Ada. We have the science US principal investigator. We have habitable worlds. And then finally we have the heliophysics guest investigator open program. In addition to that, or astrophysics guest observer guest investigator programs are permanently converting to dual anonymous peer review. We held a separate town hall for that on February 27. So how does the proposing community go about making their proposals compliant with dual anonymous peer review. I wanted to say that NASA has provided very detailed guidance to assist the proposing community with this major change in the submission of proposals. The first one is that every single program element, which will be performed under the auspices of dual anonymous has very specific program level guidance. And the inspires page of each program element contains a document, which we turn the guidelines for anonymous proposal, which describes in detail the specific requirements for anonymous proposals. Number two SMD has a whole host of resources, including a quick start tutorial, as well as frequently asked questions, both of which may be found at the URL provided on that slide. The five main points to remember when submitting anonymous proposals are these. Number one, exclude the names and affiliations of the proposing team, including in the figures and references to personal websites. Number two, this is an important change. Please do not claim ownership of past work. So don't say my previously funded work or our analysis shown. Instead, we need you to write, including references in the passive third person. So prior analysis, we need you to use square brackets. Number four, of course, please do describe the work proposed. So absolutely, you must say we propose to do the following or we will measure the effects of. And then finally, you'll need to include a separate not anonymized expertise and resources document. And we'll be providing more details for that later on. A very common question is how do you reference unpublished work or how do you reference priority results? So our advice is as follows, we understand that it may be occasionally important to cite exclusive access data sets or non public software or unpublished data or findings that have been presented elsewhere in public, but not yet sightable. And each of these may reveal or strongly imply the investigators on the proposal. So in these instances, we recommend that proposers use language such as obtained in private communication or from private consultation, when referring to such potentially identifying work. Now I can recall that the goal of dual anonymous is to create a shift in the tenor of discussion, not to make it absolutely impossible to guess who the team. Another common question is in proposals where a team member has institutional accesses to unique facilities such an observatory or a laboratory, both of which would be required to complete the proposed work. So in italics here I'm sharing an example in the anonymized section of proposal. You can say that the team has access to telescope time on the cake observatory. This will enable spectroscopic follow up. So that doesn't really give clues to the identities of the proposing team. But we recommend that you validate that claim in a not anonymized expertise and resources document. Here's an example of anonymization. The paragraph above has not been anonymized. The paragraph below has been anonymized and thanks to the Hubble team for allowing us to include this. In yellow. You can change in Roger set out 2014 we concluded to prior work square brackets 12 concluded in green if our model from Roger set out 2014 is correct. You would simply change to if the model from 12 is correct. And our first epoch you can change to a first epoch to again not signify ownership. A very common question, of course, is how is the capability of the team to execute the proposed investigation taken into account. And here this is where we provide details for what we term the expertise and resources not doc not anonymized document. This document will get distributed to panelists for a subset of proposals, typically the top third according to the distribution of assigned grades, projected selection rates and so forth. It contains many elements. A key summary is as follows, you need to include a list of team members together with their roles. Brief descriptions of the scientific and technical expertise that each team member brings a discussion of the contribution that each team member will make to the proposed investigation. And discussing the specific resources that are required. A summary of work effort to include a not anonymized table of work effort by a sketches if required, statements of current and pending if required, and that is a resource support again if required by the solicitation. And the guidelines for anonymous proposals document includes a work to example. Here's some other requirements which I won't go into in detail here but I just wanted to point out that the guidelines for anonymous proposal document actually spells them out in significant detail. So how will your proposals be reviewed. The flow of the reviewers as follows. You'll start off with an anonymized scientific review. This is where the review panel discusses those anonymous proposals. All assessments get completed or grades get finalized or panel summaries are written. And then number two, the expertise and resources document will be distributed to panelists for a subset of proposals. Typically the top third, a panelist go forth and assess the team and resources capability to execute the proposed investigation. What do we tell our review panelists. We tell our review panelists to consider proposals solely on the scientific merit of what's proposed. We ask them to not spend any time attempting to identify the PI or the team. And even if our reviewers think they know the identities of the team, we instruct them to discuss the science and not the people. We have NASA appointed levelers in each panel room to ensure that the discussion does not veer off. We also tell our reviewers to keep in mind that language can be very important. We ask them to use appropriately neutral pronouns so what they prefer or what the team has evaluated when they write their panel summaries. As the discussion unfolds, we have NASA appointed levelers in each room. In addition to panel support staff, the role of the levelers to ensure that the panel discussions focus on the scientific merit. And unlike the chairs, they're not listening for issues pertaining to the science, but what they're actually primarily focused on the discussion itself. Now, if the discussion does appear into comments on the proposing team or their password, the validity or their identities, we make sure that our levelers simply refocus that discussion. But if that discussion gets out of hand, which very rarely it will, levelers have the authority to stop the discussion. Let's move on to the discussion of the expertise and resources, not anonymized document. So again, the scientific evaluation of all the proposals is completed. Then we distribute this document to panelists for a subset of proposals, typically the top third, according to the distribution of assigned grades and projected selection rates. And we asked our panelists to assess the team team capability to execute the proposed investigation using a three point scale, uniquely qualified, qualified or not qualified. And we provide details of what each of those criteria and ratings means. And we set the expectation that the vast majority of the proposals, say 98% or so, will fall into the qualified category. Here are some answers to the questions that were submitted in advance of the web. The first one is this, if the identity of the proposing teams and institutions is shrouded in secrecy, then how are proposing teams and institutions to discuss their track record, their ongoing work, their complementary endeavors, their institutional assets and so forth. Our answer to that is as follows, the anonymized proposal set absolutely no prohibition on discussing these aspects. But we do ask that they be discussed without attribution to a particular investigator or group. And in situations like this, we simply recommend writing previous work. Instead of our previous work or using words such as obtained in private communication. Now remember, as always, proposers should be able to make their case through their description of their proposed program of observations and analysis. And of course, there is the opportunity for them to demonstrate and validate the claims using the expertise and resources, not anonymized document. And again, remember that the goal of dual anonymous is not to make it completely impossible to guess the identities of the investigators, but to shift the focus of discussion away from the individuals and towards the proposed science. Another question that was highly upvoted is this. Why not just solve the demonstrable problems in selection practices at the Space Telescope Science Institute, rather than change the systems across all of NASA's Science Mission Directorate. Well, firstly, I'd say we would actually dispute that there are any problems in the selection practices at Space Telescope, we actually think they run an extremely competent, fair and thorough review. But we would point out again, the key goal of dual anonymous is to level the playing field for everyone. And once more remember that this is a pilot study for just four programs out of over 100 SMD roses elements. Another question. While it's not possible for the proposing teams not to show any information proposals that might reveal their identities, such as the context and motivation of the proposed research, unique methodologies cited references, why keep reviewers guessing. Leading to undesirable consequences. Furthermore, the track records of the proposals should be part of the merits of the proposals. Once more, we respond by saying that it's entirely appropriate for the context and motivation be addressed in the anonymized proposal. But again, you must not attribute these to a particular investigator or group or claim ownership of that work. And again, the track records of the proposing team will be addressed in the expertise and resources not anonymous document. Three very similar questions for us, and they all circle around the concept of demonstrating whether there are sufficient institutional resources or access to custom built facilities or laboratories. And indeed, how in general does the proposing teams ability to accomplish the research get evaluated. I hope this webinar has served as a reminder that what we're really trying to do here is to separate out the anonymized science proposal from any claims of validation, which is subject subsequently get discussed in the expertise and resources, not anonymized document. So I hope that this webinar has provided a little bit of confidence to the proposal community that the qualifications teams and experience of the PI and track record are not entirely eliminated. But they are evaluated rather in a separate step after the scientific evaluation of the proposal is completed. Another question was that what do you expect the unintended consequences of this action to be. And does this really serve the meritocracy. The experience for the Hubble Space Telescope indicates that there were very few unintended consequences. But NASA is proactively taking steps to ensure the following, but the SMD programs in this pilot, then themselves to dual anonymous peer review that they were very carefully chosen. We're also ensuring the proposals have sufficient information and guidance to adequately anonymize their proposals. We're also making sure that review panels are sufficiently briefed about dual anonymous peer review. We're also trying to make sure that the duration of each panel is not significantly increased. Once more, we're trying to ensure that conflicts of interest are identified ahead of time and not during the review if at all possible. And then finally, we're trying to make sure that high risk, high impact proposals are not disproportionately affected. We have a new SMD blue ribbon panel to ensure just that. NASA understands that dual anonymous peer review represents a major shift in the evaluation of proposals. We understand that there may be occasional slips in right to be anonymized proposals. However, NASA does reserve the right to return without review any proposals that are particularly egregious in terms of the identification of the opposing team. We further acknowledge that some proposed work may be so specialized that despite good faith attempts to anonymize the proposal, the identities of the PI and the team members are readily discernible. But as long as those guidelines are followed, NASA will not return these proposals without review. Finally, we make sure and we encourage all of our PIs and proposing community to plan adequately and feel free to contact your program officer or to email this address very much for listening.


All righty, let's watch his first zero Whoa easy on the shrimp Those are supposed to be for everybody. I took a few hundred. Why put that back Yo, keep this girl away from the ocean That's what the shrimp said Oh, it's good. All right So it's been a while since I've seen this but it's cool to see it again, and I think my main impression I think it's mostly about him Where I would tone down some of the moves, so let's see Like here already now. I'm changing my junior. It's not for this part. It's not toning down. I think it's more It's more focused moves where He's looking this way. It has a fairly soft turn to the left and Whoa, even though It's you know sharp enough in here if you look at the body It's always moving to the right. So it feels to me like This should be a bit more calm where he looks over and he can look over with a little bit of body movement and then You have to decide. I'm as strange since you were in my class and these are these are my previous notes But I'm looking at when he takes that step I think what you could do is a little bit of movement and you can take the step to look I'm just concerned that now this this step with all of that body movement takes away from this It's almost like it's almost like you want to take that step, but not be You know further to the right than this So when there's a reaction you can go whoa like you can actually move the body fairly To the right if that makes sense like the translet would be moving a little bit moving and whoa versus now It's just moving all the time until whoa The whoa seems to be mostly in that head up and shoulder up and finishing That translates hope that makes sense. I feel like it this could be just a bit more Accent and watch out your translate and your rotation gives us almost a bit of a pivot here And that in that ear section. I think you want to It will help translating a bit less and keeping that turn It's that way that way you won't have that constant immediate movement in the in the body So imagine you're moving a lot less to the right head stays the same in terms of the amount of rotation That's just kind of the move and then there's a little bit more movement as he finishes that turn And does a bit of a side step, but then the side step. He's a bit more like this like he is balanced Looking at this and then when he has the whoa You can finish that sudden translate over to this But then here I Feel like there needs to be more in the head Well, he doesn't really move it's almost like that that head is an I came out of world space Where it would be like easy on the shrimp like even a little head up and down And even on shrimp you can have a little bit of root up and down Those are supposed to be for everybody Those are supposed to be for everybody and then before everybody everybody would have see Actually, now all my notes are about emptying it up instead of turning it down But that's for later. So everybody is same thing I would have a little bit of maybe a little bit of a lean forward a little bit of root up and down in the head accent Everybody must be for everybody. And then you can relax back down to the right and what you have Everybody and the same thing here. He goes down and it keeps moving to the right Into this to me. It would be this come down and hold so he's not really moving so we can look at her And then he goes But then that move It's almost like you want to lead with the head. It's the head up This that almost pulls the body to the right And that's the thing even though it makes me laugh Watching it now. It feels fairly big I would reduce the forward and back like 20% Just a little bit And then same thing here once you're done He keeps drifting to the left back into that. So it's like keeping it here and then And then he goes forward like that forward drift that forward for him for but for us left I would hold that a bit.  It's almost like he gestures back on top of this And the same thing here once you're done back immediately Rotates and moves. Yeah, keep this girl and it's always moving just it doesn't overall softness to it So it's almost like get back hold and Then it's almost like, you know hold to making sure she does it then she goes, okay And after she says okay, then he moves was that way also we know where to look So he's not always going attention and always holding are always moving Yeah, keep this girl with the ocean And here ocean feels this is all a bit One move I will keep this slow slow slow and then ocean that part a bit stronger than all of this That makes sense instead of one big move. It's slow big ocean That's what the shrimp said That's what the shrimp said And then watch out This is a bit too post to pose where this goes up and then it feels a bit too close I feel like it's almost uncomfortable Or maybe you want to raise a little bit in frame Maybe that might be here, but I would I would keep this maybe to here Maybe to here give a little bit of space and not overlap And not too opposed to posting where the head is down the same time as this is up. That's what the shrimp said That's what the shrimp said and on this part.  That's fairly smooth That's what the shrimps and then you Simplify these a lot where you wouldn't have those big one frame pops in the jaw Like one frame close one frame up You're going to keep this over two three frames. You can simplify this a lot You have a lot of chatter in the corners as they go out and then in and then out So it will be simplifying this by by a lot of shrimp said I just see a lot of chatter And strobing in there all the shrimp said all the shrimp said That's what the shrimp said That's what the shrimp said This is to me the biggest thing some stuff about the eyebrows, but I would just there's a lot of body changes that I'm suggesting So I would I would start with that because it's gonna have to refocus where we look Easy on the shrimp. Oh easy. I feel like there's something a bit too strong in that second Move down. It's almost like she's hiking a trail here Maybe a bit less forward. Oh easy on and then on the back I would overshoot the chest a little bit. It feels like we're going from this To this and it's fairly locked. I like that this continues to move But I would soften this almost a little bit And I know if that's an IK arm, but you're getting into a fairly straight path here.  It's fairly straight It does feel a bit like an IK because you have movement in the elbow up and down or here up But the rotation is the same here So you're gonna have to align this a bit more with the forearm So even if there's an elbow movement, you're gonna have a bit more effect on Forearm and that's going to affect the wrist a bit more Just be for everybody I only took a few Yeah, I took a few hundred Alright, put that back Okay She's so good though Hundred Alright, put that back Okay Yo, kid I only took a few Yeah, I took a few hundred Alright, put that back I only took a few Yeah, I took a few hundred Now seeing this now and I know, you know, maybe maybe you've worked on things I feel back giving all those notes and since I don't know who who gave you notes Or if you continued or this is my failing But I feel like there's too much movement on her as well If she goes This is now she explained herself and she wants to see how he reacts And we are going over to look at him So I wouldn't bring her head down because it distracts You need to keep looking at him So to me it feels like you want to stay there Yeah, I took a few hundred Into this you just delete that look down So she stays from here to here and then Alright, put that back And then she goes down into the ocean That makes sense Looking, looking, looking And now she heard what he had to say and then she can do this And that's that Alright, so these are kind of big rich notes Let me know, let me know what you think And how you want to move forward And you know, the errors you want to keep and change And all that good stuff Alright, thank you Alright, there's an email You can sign up You can start whenever you want You can submit whatever you want You get 16 submissions Either way, a like and subscribe would be awesome Alright, thank you