My friend there was a little agitated about transformative achievements and I'll give you a joke before I make my actually written submission because it's important for us as a nation, we're together in development partners and it's much of France. A friend sent me a tweet yesterday and they said just sample this as it tells you the state of hopelessness that you have faced with this country. He said I'm going to get my barrier certificate and keep it in my pocket because by the time I die this thing will be costing a million dollars. What does that take you? And yesterday listening to President Ruto talk about reality checks this is the reality of our times incremental unemployment but unless I go astray let me thank you Madame Annette Soander Conrad Adenos Tipta. I'm not as good in German as my brother I love to hear that and also acknowledge Caroline Kanta deputy director for European. I became the nexus I became the gum when the country was falling apart. It is particularly not worth it. At my party then the orange democratic movement Kenya I used to say between me and Ryder we didn't even know how to divide the oranges and because he may kept the whole orange and I kept an orange and a half. So my own party then that time our audience Kenya negotiated a post-Electro agreement in President Kibaki is a PNU that helps stop the violence at least before my brother was brought on board by Kofi Anna and you know that was serious conflict that is what gave rise to Kenya leaders going to the Hague and you know and sometimes blame the wrong people I've had some of them blame Ryder and it's not right at all I undertook an impossible task of trying to convince the United Nations Security Council to allow us to have to have Kenyan leaders tried here and then Kenya is overwhelmingly through local radio stations used to say don't be vague go to the Hague. So under the auspices of Kenya National Dialogue and Reconciliation Committee Dr. Kofi Anna the late brother and a real pan-Africanist the chairman of the panel of eminent African personalities was tasked by the international community and of course the Afghan leadership to help to resolve that political crisis and on February 1st 2008 he brought the late Mui Kibaki and our brother Raylof Linger to the negotiating table and where the four agenda items are agreed upon namely agenda one immediate action to stop the violence and restore fundamental rights and liberties agenda item number two immediate measures to address the humanitarian crisis and promote healing and reconciliation agenda item number three out of account the political crisis and agenda item number four addressing the long-term issues including undertaking constitutional legal and institutional reforms land reform tackling poverty and inequality as well as combating regional development in balances tackling and employment particularly among the youth consolidating national coalition and unity and addressing transparency accountability and impunity that was a major agenda and it was to a large extent achieved except for agenda item number four and that must move faster agenda agendas one two and three were faithfully carried out and on February 28 2008 President Kibaki and right on above Odinga signed the agreement on the principles of partnership of the coalition government in part the preamble are found i quote there must be real power sharing to move the country forward and begin the healing and the reconciliation process with this agreement we are stepping forward together as political leaders to overcome the current crisis and set the country on a new path on a new path this agreement is designed to create an environment conducive to such a partnership and to build mutual trust and confidence everything they own destroyed and even as recent as two weeks ago 25 000 people in Mavoko had what they call their homes destroyed and and we hear you friends in Kenya fans are telling us affordable housing what the fellows have put together what they could afford and you destroyed you destroyed and you are telling them affordable housing so ladies and gentlemen we cannot hope to transform our nation indeed any nation without meaningful dialogue that is built on mutual trust and confidence nonetheless i've observed that during our 73 days we've already done 73 days of a national day good who are so kind and both sides have learned to respect one another's points of view therefore i must congratulate my friend my coach Kimanichomo when he came in i told Kiman i looked at him i said listen you're young i think you're very young and the future is ahead of you me i can go back to say guru right and forget about you guys but if you don't succeed at these talks history will judge you badly and we must therefore confront the truth the truth and nothing but the truth our forefathers the likes of Zedromo Kenyatta and Jaramogi Oginga Odinga were able to negotiate and compromise even with the British colonialists when when Zedromo Oginga Odinga said without Jarmu Kenyatta there'll be no freedom now we should emulate that 26 years ago the late president and arab moist ruling party Kahn by the way i was Kahn was organizing secretary for 12 good years i was elected national organizing secretary the same day with the late Moses Mondabab Mondavadi Wycliffe's father so you can see if Mondabadi is beginning to look old he i was i started into his own late father that is the beauty when you are young you see it all and i therefore can pass this information this wisdom sometimes Rakhove depending on how you look at it to the younger leaders you say more than i was able to accompany that after the violence that followed 207 elections and almost all our nation apart Zekibaki our brother Eila and indeed myself with our respective coalitions were able to come together and work on creating a durable new constitution our history is replete examples of transformative national dialogue for the betterment of our kidneys we at Azmiullah Majewan Kenyalan's coalition remain optimistic that these bipartisan talks we should conclude with a report and it to both my friend William Roto and my brother here on November 22nd we are very clear you don't want to stay there for longer than is necessary and some of them say we have paid huge sums of money i've not seen ascent i'm giving my time in my everything to my country so that these things can succeed


Laws a fair capitalism and individual rights Yaron Brooke the executive director of the iron Rand Institute invites you to the conversation The Iran Brooke show starts now on a560 the answer Hey, so you guys out there marching for science today is the March for Science You should be out in the streets.  Don't you support science? I certainly do But would I much for a march for science on earth day? No No, not an earth day. I mean if they had on another day I Would consider it But the very fact that the March for Science is On earth they Suggest that this is about politics. This is about a philosophical agenda. This is about indeed the negation of Science because what does earth they represent? What day is like a? March to scare people into believing that the earth is gonna the world is gonna end any day now All because of you because of our human activity What they is an anti-man anti-life anti-industrialization anti-human progress Anti-science day that's what earth they is anti-progress and the technology It's about shutting us down and Yet they want to pretend they would pretend that they are the rational defenders of science Now I wish that were true. I know not that I wish they were the defenders I wish I wish there was a real march of science. I would march for much for science. I mean there's actually a A lot of reasons to worry about science and to be pro-science right now and to advocate for science because I believe science is under attack Constantly by left and right But think about what earth they represent earth they was started in 1970 By the ecology movement back then it was called that later morphed into the environmentalist movement And what is the premise of earth day? well, I I I Have a quote from an article I was reading It says the earth is dying the science is clear.  I mean I give me a break human beings have this millennial You know end of the world It's almost scenario embedded in their minds that keeps coming back over and over and over again We're gonna die of overpopulation.  We're becoming wealthier particularly people in poor countries are becoming wealthier So, you know instead of Instead of You know celebrating human life human achievement human progress human health The human environment which is getting better and better all the time our water is cleaner our air is cleaner Instead they constantly no matter what we do to clean the environment They constantly tell us They're one the verge of destruction That we need to do something dramatic to save ourselves and usually that something dramatic is Stop halt. Don't live Don't use carbon fuels. Don't drive your car Sacrifice be noble. It's for good cause. We're gonna save humanity. That's what they're telling us it would be and It's sad and this is the Republicans fault. It's sad That these environmentalists have managed to co-opt science because they don't represent science They represent a religion. They represent mass hysteria. They represent Emotionalism panic fear But the problem is the Republican Party is represented by people don't believe in evolution. So they can't defend science. So politically nobody Nobody is defending science politically all we have are gangs They want to influence science in their own direction. So the Republicans Want to stop using stem cells, you know, embryonic stem cells because that's God is forbidding and the Democrats On all the science is conclusive. We are on the verge of ending the world unless we take over and Stop industrialization and stop technological progress Neither one is science neither party is the pro-science party both the anti-science And that's why I'd like to see a real science day a real March for science a March that represents a defense of real science Of evidence-based science of looking out there into reality and figuring out what works Explained reality what explains reality one doesn't both The theoretical level and then turning it into practical knowledge.  I mean, it's unbelievable how much we have and even more so I'd say in taking that science and applying it to Our lives applying it to the stuff that makes our lives Successful from indoor plumbing which requires science to building skyscrapers To all the goodies from cars to all the stuff that we use to of course the technology That I'm using to broadcast this show and every other piece of technology the super computer having my pocket and on and on and on We go. We are massive beneficiaries of the application of science to solving the problems Involved in human life and existence. All right, we're gonna take a call from Skyler and then we'll go on. Hey Skyler, how's it going? Yeah, well, I wish I wish it was I wish that's what they were celebrating I'm all for exploiting the oath I'll get to that in a minute. Go ahead It's related to that the three are reduce reuse and recycle how proper is it and when is it? When is it proper to use those things? It's ridiculous. Why would we reduce? We want abundance. We don't want to reduction We want to increase our standard of living. We want more wealth. We want more technology We want more goodies. We want more stuff We want to live the best life that we can live materially and spiritually and and the spirit needs the material so that you need to maximize both and There's no limit to human needs. We want more and that's a good thing. We want to innovate We want to go to the stars. I mean, there's no limit to our ambition to our dreams to our wants and Technology and science and engineering and and in capitalism really make it possible for us to achieve anything We want so why would use and the same thing with reuse? I mean sure when there's an economic reason to reuse and recycle Then then there'll be an economic motivation to do so but mostly Why spend the energy on we're using and recycling when my when we can spend the energy on Building and creating new stuff. I mean, I like to use the I mean recycling just doesn't make any sense that the trucks That pick up the recycling and and all the different garbage cans that we now have to put out in our yard Probably pollute more than anything you say by actually recycling and it's actually just have anything by recycling I'll give you an example of paper Nobody believes this but it's actually pure simple economics and reality the more paper you recycle the fewer trees They're going to be Because if you recycle all the paper then paper producers say well We'll need less paper new paper in the future and now plant less trees and they'll turn forests which are usually Grown in order to produce lumber for truth for paper for paper products They'll change the use of that land. They'll turn into agriculture land They're telling the housing development. They'll build a factory. They'll build a shopping mall Who knows what they'll build it, but they'll find a more economic use for that same land So the lower the demand for paper in the future the fewer trees there will be trees are a renewable resource any renewable resource The quantity of that renewable resource is completely dependent on the demand for that resource So if the demand for chickens go down because we stop eating chicken There will be fewer chickens in the world if the demand for paper goes down tomorrow dramatically There will actually be fewer trees in the world because we'll stop cutting them down now Yes, this assumes private property and this is true in the United States It might not be true in the Amazon, but it certainly is true in the United States and as a consequence Because paper demand has gone through the roof over the last hundred years They're more trees today in America than ever before plus We need less land in order to produce the same amount of food because of technology. So I am all against reduce reuse recycle I'm for Maximize your life. Go ahead. We've only got 40 seconds to make it quick Yeah, I mean if metal was was it made sense to recycle metal then they would pay you to recycle metal So I think it's true that in large quantities of metal Right like like cars and stuff like that. It makes sense to recycle. There's a huge recycling business in steel But I'm not sure it makes sense in many other things and again the marketplace would tell us. All right, Skyler Really appreciate the call. Good question Most recycling doesn't make any sense Scientifically and economically. All right. You're listening to your own book show. We'll be back in a few seconds Stuck in traffic. We've got the answer from the Woodfield Nissan.com traffic center Kevin Henry taking a look at the road if you're traveling eastbound on 80 94 What's up Northwest Indiana gonna see some slowdowns between play The roadway there westbound delays from Klein to Kelley Matt That's about it for your Northwest Indiana trip westbound on the Jane Adams couple right lanes are down Easebound has that same roadwork, but only westbound has a delay That's the inbound even taking us 31 minutes from Lake Cook another 25 from there Outbound to the junction takes 15 local nine express in 35 total In Mount Iket 48 minutes about a minute last outbound and the inbound Stevenson taking you 46 and 40 hours 55 and most with cloudy right now. It's clear tonight a low of 42 and a high of 60 on Sunday with some sun next update 15 minutes on a m5 60 the answer Do you own or run a business in Illinois that succeeded in this challenging economic environment if so We want to hear about it a m5 60s business tour 2017 presented by signature bank will be highlighting business success stories Tell us your story and be a part of a live broadcast of Chicago's morning answer with Dan and Amy find out more and submit your information At 560 the answer dot com slash business. That's 560 the answer dot com slash business Ein Rand was a radical thinker whose philosophical novels challenge students to reconsider their views on fundamental issues the fountainhead Atlas shrugged and anthem these works have become classics of American literature They've never failed to engage young people and stimulate intense classroom discussion by offering these works for free to teachers The Ein Rand Institute hopes to encourage greater awareness and understanding of rands stimulating perspective If you're a teacher who would like Ein Rand's books in your classroom visit Ein Rand dot org This is at no cost to you go to Ein Rand dot org today If you like what you hear on the Iran brook show and want to engage more with host Iran brook Be sure to follow him on social media Lucky for you. It's easier than ever to get updates Ask questions and hear answers from one of the leading minds and objectivism Follow your on today on twitter at your on brook youtube. Why brook? That's twitter at your on brook and youtube. Why brook? You can also sign up for show updates at blog talk radio Simply search the Iran brook show Are you stuck in a bad home mortgage? We'll join the club that has about 10 million other american families, but i may be able to help you My name is lou bridges i'm an attorney with the law firm of lou bridges and associates We've been helping distressed homeowners like you for over eight years now. Give us a call. We provide free consultations I guarantee you it will not be a sales pitch We will give you our honest legal analysis council recommendations and advice regarding your options We are experts in doing low modifications successfully. We know the regs. We understand the process Most importantly, we don't take no for an answer. We fight. We are prepared and we win We save houses. We make houses affordable So if you want to keep your house affordable Contact us go to bridges law dot net or call<PHONE_NUMBER> That's<PHONE_NUMBER> Remember people never give up the land fight for truth and justice you do that Yeah, I guarantee you'll never be alone in this country Intrigued inspired and possibly even angered Welcome back to the iran brook show on am 560 the answer Well, it seems like we've got at least one angered caller. We'll get to pink us in a minute He wants to challenge me in the whole recycling thing, but let me just say again We're talking about uh that march for science and and earth day and I mean, I'm all for science not am I all for science. I'm always for science I'm a huge advocate for science all the time every day not on any special days all the time But but I don't think this earth day has anything to do with science I think earth day is anti science and to combine the two means that the environmentalists are trying to steal To steal the idea of science and make it theirs when the idea of science should be In the hands of those who believe in freedom and capitalism and reason and individualism And we'll get to the particular complaints of the environmentalist particularly the idea of more government funding and and Global warming and and all of that stuff. Well, we'll touch on them We can't we can't do the whole topic justice particularly given how many people already calling in but give me a break Give me a break. Science does not align to the political left Science aligns with freedom with progress And uh, well, we'll get to whether you need government to fund science or not in a minute And by the way, if any of you like the show and and would like to hear more of the Iran book show I have other episodes that I do Separate from may and 560 and you can pick up any of those episodes on any podcasting So they're on itunes. They're on the apple podcast. They're on stitcher. They're on any of these things. They come from Blogtalkradio.com. You can find me there as well. But just look for you the Iran book show y a r o n b r o ok And you can find old episodes. You can find new episodes. There's there's a ton of content That I produced over the years on this You can also find me on youtube and as I think one of the commercials said twitter You're on brook and at facebook. It's why brook. So so join the club You know, we can do a lot more together and have a lot more exchanges If you follow me in all those. All right pinkers, uh, you're frustrated and angry go at it The science has settled you rod The science has settled and this sounds like just another Koch brothers, you know, x on mobile Don't pay attention to the real damage.  What about the asthma for kids? What about the damage that people like you are causing long term? To the to rivers to the environment to species that don't even exist anymore Plans that used to grow in certain areas So, you know, it's so easy to say oh, we're worried about another time and man will adapt But you're causing major impact to the environment and that's what science is about So you say you're all for science, but yeah, you're ignoring the science and 99% of scientists agree that we're hurting the planet How do you respond to that? Well, I mean if When the case is that scientists really agree that real damage is being done real damage is being done to Uh, to my river to the river from which I draw water then those rivers are cleaned up Indeed, we live in a world today where most of the waterways are unbelievably clean indeed, you know cleaner than they've ever been before That's where you can open up a tap anywhere in your home anywhere around Anywhere around the united states and feel free to just drink the water straight out of that tap Because we are so rich we've advanced so much that we've managed to clean up all this water because it's in our self interest To have clean water We don't spew really deadly stuff into the air anymore because we figured out that that was really harmful to human life And we stopped it. The problem is that more and more of environmentalism is not it's not about human life. It's not about how well Human beings live and how prosperous and are successful and how long and how healthy we as individuals live It's become much more of a movement. That's just anti Anti technology and it's about the worship. It's become about The worship of earth the worship of mother earth is why it's called earth day. It's about the worship of the mother earth It's about the worship of nature not about human beings now I claim that we live today because of capitalism because of wealth creation We live in the cleanest environment in human history. We live longer. We live better lives We live happier lives. We live richer lives than ever before in human history So What do we got to complain about all this hysteria and all this panic? You want to recycle fine? Nobody should stop you from recycling. You want to you want to stop using carbon fuels fine stop using carbon fuels, but don't Don't force me to do it And I was going to get to this point later But one of the one of the signs that these people are not really pro science Is that if you believe that carbon fuels are causing Real damage to the earth real damage to the earth Then Why doesn't everybody? You know advocate for nuclear energy and nuclear energy is clean Nuclear energy has no carbon footprint nuclear energy is unbelievably safe There have been fewer deaths in the nuclear power plants all around the world Then from windmills and solar planners never mind gas and coal and all this other stuff It's unbelievably safe unbelievably Uh, it's expensive because of all the massive regulations that exist so that nobody nobody wants to build a nuclear power plant in the united states Because government has made it so expensive But why doesn't everybody advocate for more research in nuclear power plants to lower the costs and to create Small nuclear power plants all around the world to produce cheap Efficient clean electricity. I mean if they advocated for that Then it would say okay, you know, maybe maybe there's something here But I don't trust their science when because I don't think it's really science when their solution is always Whatever the problem is the solution is Stop living Stop producing stop in the industrialization Shut down carbon shut down oil Shut down coal when these things are scientifically unbelievably good So I just don't buy the whole environmentalism. It's become a religion not a science. I'm not against Cleaning their environment for human beings I think there are plenty of mechanisms to do that with our massive regulations or a massive government institutions in order to enforce it um, I don't place the the the so-called I don't know Planet over the lives of human beings the planet is there so that I can live a better life And the only way human beings live and this is this would be my final point. Thanks for calling pink. It's really appreciated, but The the the the way human beings live and john I know you're holding and I'll probably get you after this break because let me make this point The way human beings survive as compared to any other animal Is that we use our minds To change the environment We figure out What is necessary for us to live a good life To not be exposed to the elements To be able to bring in food To be able to improve our condition To be able to for more and more human beings to be able to live and We do all this by using our minds to figure out how to change the environment so Most animals right all animals they need a place to live they you know, they find a cave They live in a cave That's what human beings did initially But then the cave was kind of cold and the fires were smelly and it was not a pleasant place to live So they went out of the cave and plus the sabertooth tiger lived in the cave and he was scary So they went out of the cave And we started building mud huts or wood huts or whatever right, but that required real intelligence We had to take mud and reshape our environment. We had to chop down trees and build something We are unique animal in the sense that we do this Right. We don't rely on food to keep ourselves warm. We rely on making fire. We rely on creating clothes. We rely on building homes Everything we do everything in your home right now Every single thing is a consequence of mining of cutting down trees of scooping up silicon from sand or whatever It all involves changing the environment for the sake of making human life better And that's what the planet is here for It's for us to exploit rationally exploit by the use of our mind In order to allow us as human beings as individual human to live better lives And we take science to understand the world around us so that we can exploit more Right, so a long long time ago. There used to be this black muck They used to be ooze out of the ground and it used to dramatically lower property prices Because it would smell and you couldn't do anything with it and it destroyed every cultural crops And it could it could light up I think on fire and it was just awful Until science discovered that we could take this black muck and refine it down to a million different products Almost everything in your room, wherever you are Has carbon fuels in it. It has oil in it, whether it's the plastics, whether it's some of the stuff they put on On the walls paint, paint is made from from oil You know whether it's component with any computer not to mention your car and your electricity and everything else So to demonize that's another sign that there's something wrong with the environmentalist movement To demonize this source this wonderful source But notice it used to be a past and it's the human mind that made it a resource To demonize this wonderful resource. That's just a tragedy. All right, you're listening to your own book show We'll be right back after the break and take a call from john about environmentalism Do you own or run a business in illinois that succeeded in this challenging economic environment? If so, we want to hear about it. AM 5 60s business tour 2017 presented by signet rebank We'll be highlighting business success stories. Tell us your story and be a part of a live broadcast of chicago's morning answer with dan and amy Find out more and submit your information at 5 60 the answer dot com slash business That's 5 60 the answer dot com slash business Fox news radio i'm carib mckew french voters head to the polls tomorrow in a hotly contested race for that country's next president So we're choosing between 11 and different candidates the two top vote getters will then go on to a runoff But it shows how unsettled and how unhappy the population is here both about the the status quo about a stagnant economy And also concerned about uh insecurity that was underscored by that attack on thursday on police officers and one officer killed two injured Isis claiming responsibility. Fox is greg palchite in paris in cities across the country and the world today people taking part in the march for science Seen by many as a protest against the trump administration's views on issues like climate change i'm here to support the the notion that our society has to be based on rationality and reason philip vedat's a social scientist originally from iran on the march in boston Fox news we report you decide How can you get from here to there? We've got the answer from the woodfield nissan dot com traffic center i'm kevin henry taking a look at the roads out at morten grove cruise with an accident at golf near washington street The inbound edens takes you a half hour from lake cook the inbound kennedy 45 from ohare 25 from the junction crash on the right shoulder near urving park Outbound side to montrose had 14 minutes nine in the express 32 to ohare The inbound eisenhower 50 from thorndale jammed on the extension between north and the tri-state then pretty heavy wolf dog park And western to the burn interchange if you're coming from manheim, it'll take you 32 31 back to manheim and 44 back to thorndale Almost an hour inbound on the stevensson with delays lamont to route 83 first to kenzie and ashland to lake shore drives Outbound a little bit better at 42 minutes right now in chicago 58 degrees mostly cloudy clear tonight a little 42 I have 60 tomorrow with sun next update 15 minutes on am 5 60 the answer Hi, i'm dr. Bob marshall phd a host of the helpline join me live and hear the latest breakthrough information for you and your Family this month special is melatonin pg the world's first live-source probiotic fermented melatonin for premier brain sleep immune and antioxidant support by two bottles get the third one free call 800 370 34 47 join dr. Bob marshall for helpline Saturday morning at 10 on am 5 60 the answer when the fountain head was first published more than 70 years ago iron ran's bold literary vision and groundbreaking philosophy of individualism captured the world's attention Initially rejected by 12 publishers as too intellectual the novel became an instant classic and continues to provoke heated debates What motivates a creative thinker? Is it a selfless desire to benefit mankind a hunger for fame fortune and accolades the need to prove superiority? Or is it a self-sufficient drive to pursue a creative vision independent of others needs or opinions? Iron ran addresses these questions through her portrayal of howard work an innovative architect who as she puts struggles for the integrity of His creative work against every form of social opposition It's also the story of his love affair with a woman who seeks to defeat him The fountain head is as relevant today as it was when ran first pendant The novel was also a personal landmark for rand in howard work She presented for the first time the uniquely iron ran hero Man as he could be and ought to be order your copy today in amazon.com The iron ran institute campus is an exciting online destination offering free e-courses on iron ran and her revolutionary philosophy of Objectivism whether you recently picked up your first rand book or have been reading her novels and nonfiction for years a r i campus has something for you on campus You'll discover a variety of multimedia courses covering rand's literary classics Specific aspects of thought and how to apply her ideas to your life get started today at campus dot iron ran dot org See you on campus Why choose to bota and associates to handle your retirement well because we provide objective advice and concierge service Investments insurance retirement planning all at one location We also partner with qualified attorneys and cpa's to provide complete financial strategies for our clients We use a variety of investment and insurance products to custom design retirement plans that can give clients a clear look at their future We hope you stay on the path toward financial independence If you don't want to do it yourself and you want to work with the team to create a financial strategy for your future Give us a call six three zero seven seven seven 79 55 that's six three zero seven seven seven 79 55 would you rather get retirement advice from some tv show host? Who doesn't know anything about you or to bota and associates six three zero seven seven seven 79 55 To bota and associates has registered investment advisory firm jack to bota is an investment advisor representative and insurance professional investing in both risk Including the possible loss of principal investment advisory services offered through a well management llc No traditional conservative view nor the standard libertarian ones Welcome back to the discussion of iron rand's radical fundamental principles of freedom This is the uran brook show an a5 60 the answer So we're talking today about the absurdity of having The march for science on earth day of all days. We just heard a clip during the news show About reason and science reason and rationality, and that's what science represents. Absolutely. I'm all for that But the environmentalism movement unfortunately and the and the other people behind this march have nothing to do with reason and rationality and You know the problem is that fox which is airing that which is that that clip And the rights republican party or whatever have also been anti science and don't represent reason and rationality They tend to represent faith and religion, which is the opposite of reason and rationality So what you get here is a is this alternative of two groups, and this is how we think about the world two groups Those who claim that pro-science, but a really undercutting science with environmentalism And those who are pro-faith and just a pro-science when it's convenient for them And there's no real pro-science movement I'm for science for understanding the way the world lives of applying reason and rationality to everything We do not only When it's politically convenient to do so not only When it does when it doesn't contradict You know some biblical statement. All right. If you want in on the conversation three one two six four two five six zero zero What do you think about the march for science? What do you think about science in general and about environmentalism three one two six four two five six zero zero left here from somebody who's out there marching or has been marching or from somebody who is A big earthy supporter come on call in three one two six four two five six zero zero and we're gonna go to john and i'm curious What john asked to say hey john how's it going? Good you're on how are you? I'm good. I'm good Good, uh, well the first and foremost and I want you to hear me out on this one first and I'll start by saying I'm extremely conservative and my views why always why on the right versus the left uh, and and And the thing that I don't understand is I don't understand Why it always has to be set up or why there has to be a schism involved in that? Uh an argument with environmentalism being for or against why it has to be a binary argument Why can't you be capitalist? Why can't you be conservative and why can't you still want to be? Saving the environment and I'll post to you this yeah in in the defense of humans and human Exploitation as you're trying to I guess put an argument for the uh putting forth or advocating science Versus the environment if we go on to pollute our earth in our environment Then that only ruins the environment and our planet for humans. I it kind of wrecks our cause So I agree with you why we can't be pro environmental and pro capitalist and pro conservative as well So I think we can be But that's not what this march is about and that's what these people are about But but I think we can be and this is the sense in which I think we can be if we realize that The environment is the human environment and the things that damage human beings Are not good We have a very good legal system to take care of this stuff If you pollute the river from which I'm drinking I sue you and we remedy the situation If you pollute the air that I am breathing I you know there's legal recourse for me against you if you you can't dump your garbage into buy backyard And indeed I believe that the more capitalist we are The more we emphasize private property The more all the land and the rivers and the lakes belong to individuals actual private property The cleaner they will be because we know in american legal system that you can't pollute my private property So if we if we will care about Clean air and clean water the best thing we should the the thing that we should value the most Is capitalism which means private property rights? We need to get the government out of the business Of owning rivers lakes vast quantities of land We need the government out of the business to try to regulate every little thing that we do And let us through negotiation through the legal system resolve disputes to minimize You doing something that harms me right or me doing something that harms somebody else That's how you get pro-freedom pro-capitalist consistent Protection of the human environment But when people go out and say look The earth is warming and we've decided and then we could argue the science and i'm not a scientist I'm not going to argue the science that it's carbon It's carbon emission and the solution is you have to stop driving your car We have to stop producing electricity with coal and natural gas and all these things that can't be right I mean i'm all for finding scientific solutions To cooling down the temperature of the earth if warming is really a problem How about sprinkling some stuff in the atmosphere? I don't know let's figure it out But the idea that you should stop living your kind of life that we should stop capitalism that we should stop progress Cannot be a solution To a problem any kind of environmental problem because at the end the environment is there for us to live in And if our standard of living is going to plummet so that we can save a few degrees increase in in warmth that's that's that's It can't be rational that can't be right the standard is human life the standard is individual human flourishing All right That music suggests that we're running out of time. Thanks john I mean, I agree with you science should not be political That's the most important point you should get out of this show science is not left Science is not right science is about the truth And you'll hear the truth right here on the Iran book show Stuck in traffic. We've got the answer from the woodfield Nissan.com traffic center I'm kevin henry taking a look at the roads out in morton grove a crash at golf in washington Elgin at liberty and page and in roselle at urban park and roselle road Eden's inbound. It's going to be a half hour from lake cook Almost another half hour from there into downtown of the kennedy 45 from the airport a right shoulder walk and crash at urban Outbound a mantra is taking you 14 express saving some time at 9 32 o' hair 50 inbound on the ight from thorn dale 32 from banheim out to mankind takes 31 44 to thorn dale Stevenson in from 355 at 55 minutes 37 from the tri-state your jam between lamont and route 83 with the left lane Block and crash outbound gapers starting right around the tri-state 45 to 355 right now in chicago 58 mostly cloudy dropping to 42 with clear skies tonight A high of 60 on sunday with some sun next update in 15 minutes on a m5 60 the answer Somewhere in america at just this moment as you sit listening to this radio show There's a young person waiting to discover iran's novels Waiting to have his or her life changed by the beauty of iran's art and the logic of her ideas Through ari's free books to teachers program We have delivered more than three million copies of iran's books to schools in every state You can help us reach young minds today. Make your tax-deductible contribution now at iran.org slash support iron rand was a radical thinker whose philosophical novels challenge students to reconsider their views on fundamental issues The fountainhead atlas shrugged an anthem these works have become classics of american literature There never fail to engage young people and stimulate intense classroom discussion by offering these works for free to teachers The iron rand institute hopes to encourage greater awareness and understanding of rand's stimulating perspective If you're a teacher who would like iran's books in your classroom visit iron rand dot org This is at no cost to you go to iron rand dot org today 2017 marks the 60th anniversary of iran's atlas shrugged 12 years in the writing it is rand's master work Despite being published six decades ago the novel continues to gain recognition and profoundly influence business leaders Thought leaders and a growing number of political leaders its presence in today's culture cannot be denied The fascination with atlas shrugged persists because it grapples with the fundamental problems of human existence And presents radically new answers An updated cover for the mass market edition of the novel recently hit stores Order your copy today at amazon Whether you're an adoring fan who wants to add this new edition to your personal library Or someone who wants to read the book for the first time to see what all the fuss is about Pick up your copy of atlas shrugged today Order on amazon Intrigued inspired and possibly even angered Welcome back to the iran brook show on am 560 the answer So today we're talking about earth day and how the left has kind of stolen earth day To do a march on science when uh, they don't really even represent the march on they don't represent science The whole earth day thing i've talked about is is is a just a travesty and to associate earth day with science I mean that's just awful. Look I'm not a scientist and I don't have a strong opinion I have an opinion, but I don't have a strong opinion about the science behind the idea Of global warming. I just don't trust many of the advocates for this idea and I don't believe them I I have a hard time just believing them, but again, I i'm not a scientist I haven't evaluated the numbers the models the the science I just know that these people every all of their predictions have been wrong in the past So I find it harder to believe them when they predict stuff for the future Um, but The main thing the most important thing we need to do Is separate science from politics I mean If it's true that human activity You know, uh burning carbon is causing the earth to warm Then I would like a non-political answer about how fast is it happening What are the real dangers involved? What is the consequence to human life plant life the oceans everything else Is it the case that Florida is going to flood and if it does is that the end of the world? What exactly are the consequences of of what we're facing science? I want science And I want the scientists to be able to say look, we don't really know I mean, that's a good scientist when they look at a complex system like Like weather climate They're willing to say I don't know. I'm just not sure I mean these here's some probabilities. I'd like to see that And I'd like it to see divorced from politics from the democratic party or public party Or even what to do about it because then the second question is okay. What do we do about it? Well, we could just stop producing and making electricity and do all these things That seems like a really bad answer We could replace carbon based fuel with alternative energy Wait a minute about alternative energy or cost a huge amount of money There's no way to really replace all the carbon that we're using with alternative energy and Our standard of living would drop dramatically. We did that. That's not a good answer Let's list 10 answers, but scientifically not politically, but Scientifically and then used to decide the solution the standard of Human flourishing is this good for human life or bad for human life not for the planet For human life and it might turn out that even if the globe is warming even if the the the sea levels are rising It's better to leave it alone that that is the least costly For human life than any of the alternatives that we have so we'll buy more air conditioning So some people have to move to higher ground All right big deal But I'd like to see all of that analyzed rather than what we get Which is basically hysteria the world is ending. We are all gonna die And we need to we need to do something now and that something needs to be incredibly costly and incredibly destructive to individual human life All right, we got Sharon on the line and uh, I think she's gonna agree with me on some of this. Hey, Sharon. How's it going? Hi, I'm very nice. Thank you for taking my call. This is how I look at it I look at the left of being the command and control center where the reservoirs here the brown shirts Basically trying to discover themselves or disguise themselves in the color green What they want is centralized command and control to quote something that Nancy Pelosi said During the uh, I guess eruption of the obama care bill This is just something that americans will have to accept and this is problem You can have stalwarts on the far right who are also a dictatorial in that way But I've heard it mainly coming out of the left. We are dynamic As human beings and the earth is dynamic the oil basically is emitted from the center of the planet So there's nothing unnatural about the oil Neither is there anything unnatural about reusing it for our uses Well, and there's nothing unnatural about human beings. We are part of nature and it's amazing to me that on earth they They celebrate plants and they celebrate mud and they celebrate dirt But they don't celebrate human beings. They don't celebrate oil They don't celebrate our achievements aren't we part of nature aren't we an aspect of nature? And let me let me agree with you on this command and control. We used to call environmentalists They're like watermelons green on the outside red on the inside because it's interesting all those commies in the 60s They all turned environmentalists because they they learned that they could stop Progress and production and they could increase command and control and central planning more through environmentalism Than through any other means unfortunately That is true. They want to control the populace and this is the bottom line when they control the air you breathe and everything else I think that's right We do know how to basically improve our lot here And I just will mention something briefly What the bible does say we are the stewards over this planet and I think we're smart enough to know How to use the natural resources. So I don't see where it goes against nature I don't even see this false science that has even erupted from this far left and that's all it is It is transferring wealth from one pocket book someone else's wallet to someone else's wallet I mean, I agree with you. I think oops. I'm sorry. I disconnected you but that was accidentally. Sorry about that But I agree that that's what thereafter. I agree that we we can use science To change the environment to make our lives better and we can do it in a way That is not going to lead us to die.  Sure. He does.  It's none of his business as president of the united states What I buy and whom I buy it for he wants to tell me who to employ who to invite to my home He wants to limit immigration. That's command and control. I don't want command and control The only thing government should do you've heard me say this many times is protect my individual rights And otherwise leave me alone You're listening. The one book show will be right back mark your calendar Objectivist summer conference 2017 or okon 2017 for short will take place in pittsburgh, pennsylvania June 10 through the 15th the conference will be held at this historical center of industrial america And will celebrate productive heroes and the heroism of productiveness They'll also celebrate the 60th anniversary of iran's atlas shrugged visit objectivistconferences.com To explore their first time attendee discount and special rates for young adults Students you can apply for a scholarship to cover some or all of your expenses Experience the uniquely inspiring events only an objectivist conference offers Register and you'll have the opportunity to attend intellectually stimulating talks panel discussions and workshops with people who share your values Visit objectivistconferences.com and sign up today. That's objectivistconferences.com See you at okon 2017 Harvey owns a building and wants to save money by making his heating and cooling system more energy efficient Ah, yes, but harvey's afraid of the cost and if he can get a return on his investment I am indeed plus he's nervous about disrupting the businesses that rent space in his building Harvey doesn't know what to do with an hvec system that's seen better days The air comfort problem solvers to the rescue Working as a team the air comfort professionals find simple solutions that make a huge impact on building efficiency and operating costs With minimal or no disruptions to building operations hvec upgrades and retrofits from air comfort can save thousands of dollars per year They save energy reduce maintenance and eliminate downtime and buildings with better energy ratings command higher rents and selling prices And make tenants happy get real solutions from the air comfort team of problem solvers Call<PHONE_NUMBER> or visit air comfort.com and start saving money today air comfort providing the right climate for business since 1935 Yaron brook executive director of the iron rand institute speaks to audiences around the world Promoting iron rands ideas and talks and books Now he's on your radio here on am 560 the answer So one of the issues these march for science people are making a big deal out of Is the funding cuts for science that the uh trump administration has suggested We don't know if it'll ever make their budget actual budget, but they've suggested And they're saying this is anti science And there's a sense in which I kind of agree with them, right? I mean, it's I think it's wrong for republicans to come in and defund Holy areas of science that don't they don't agree with And then they will promote areas of science. They do agree with them or democrats come. They'll do the opposite This is why I want a complete separation of science from government Science shouldn't be political science shouldn't have to rely on government grants Science shouldn't have to rely on which political parties in power science shouldn't have to rely On a political agenda on on on on political views Science should be funded by people who believe in science who love science who think science is beneficial It should be funded voluntarily by all of us I would send a check in to a science foundation if the government got got out of it Universities would fund science instead of building beautiful dorms Instead of paying administrators and and hiring hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of additional administrative They could they could use all that tuition money that they've got over the last few decades And fund more science Corporations would fund science Businesses would fund science as they used to do before the government basically monopolized the funding of science and took it all over Pharmaceutical companies would fund a lot of basic science Because there's a profit motive there. That's the way you get the drugs So I I don't worry About the funding of science what I'd like to see Is the government shrink the funding of science to as close to zero as possible, but at the same time Lower taxes to as low as possible And free up capital And make reduce the corporate income tax rate to zero Thus encouraging corporations to invest money So they could do things the government could do things to free us up Now in the meantime I do wonder whether cuts the science In and of itself Is the first thing that should be cut there's so many stupid things the government does There's so many wasteful Completely useless things the government does But and that they should be cut first I mean it's starting with government involvement in health care and government involvement with our time and the government involvement with With our savings the government involvement in in the in business and in regulations and all that all of that should be scrapped And and at the same time we should scrap the funding of science And move to a private funding of science model where the science has to stand on its own to feed It has to prove itself To somebody objective not to politicians not to bureaucrats Not to scientists motivated by politics Not a scientist motivated by pleasing the political class But to to people really who love science who care about science who want science Those are the people who will be funding the science and therefore we would get real science rather than political stuff we get today I'm not saying all science stays political, but there's too much of it And it's important Science is way way way like education way too important To leave to the government I want a government that only does one thing Protects my rights and military a police force a judiciary system that arbitrates disputes and otherwise Leaves us alone. What I want is pure capitalism You're listening to Iran book show the only place on the planet where you'll hear these views The views of reason and rationality and science Talk to you next week the Iran book show. Thank you radical for capitalism host Thank you, sir. Have a great week. Keep the discussion going log on to iron rand.org Your portal to the iron rand institute learn how to apply iron rands principles in your own life and make sure you


All righty, let's check this out here. That's sound nice a question for you. Is that a repeat I Mean it sounds like it, but the weird thing is can you re-edit this so that the This is not in there It feels like someone's jogging and you all think I can In there it feels a bit distracting. I think that works fine with the sound from there on I think what you can do is before we get into the the other stuff is Everything feels the bit one axis. I want to stop up here and then just forward. I think you can do something where So when it goes up imagine a bit of a just a little bit of an arc in there with a little settle at the end What are you looking at? I could be up here. What are you looking at a bit of a Rotation in y as well since that's just up so it's imagine like you have a what are you looking at then and then and then You have a bit of a rhythm like this So it's what are you looking at it can also what are you looking at? You can always like simplify like this where you have a bit of up twirl and an at is a higher moment there So you know what are you looking at but it like it down and then up So that you have this which is that with a little bit of up You have to exhale again. I know that would be for me for the ends This is a good start. I think there's a bit of some hiccups in your forward translates whoop whoop whoop so watch out it feels like you have a bit of a Yeah, but if something going on like that in your graph out of the way You know if you go forward you have like a sudden dip sudden dip Versus a bit more of a linear translate forward. I will probably make that'll double-take a bit bigger And if you can I mean it's already super wide But if you can make those eyes even bigger scale up the eyeballs and because it's There's a lot of movement and this gets very tiny and we almost kind of miss it It's there if I look at the horse. It's there, but I wish I mean come like 15% bigger I know this is a tiny thing, but Just a bit more and I will probably cheat this cheat the head bit more and why so that you have a silhouette where the You know, it's a bit more like that. That's my horse Almost like a dog but instead of that nose part overlapping there. It's a bit more Frame here. Hold on trying to find No No, not really. So I mean the furthest you have is here Where is he almost the gap? But now if now this forms a tangent with the section with the neck here, right this in the neck So I would just cheat it so that this black line here is around here The neck is here. So you have negative space between the lower part of the head and the neck So also my question is so I was looking at this here. This really looks like Of course looking at us Breaking the fourth wall here feels almost a bit off to the left especially with this eye But this eye feels like it's looking at me, but then you address someone here off-screen So I'd be very careful in mixing this So you might have to do potentially Staying there maybe a bit more of a Softer line in the head that gives you almost a change like that. It's my horse I don't if you can Where it's almost looking this way. It's I know it's gonna be too big, but I'm just trying to find a way where Or you keep it like that and then might also be more comedic to have really the eyes the people in the corners here We're looking this way This is a bit clunky there. I feel like We can make this a bit stronger a when you go Like you have got you know that stop here and as the horse goes forward. Could you Like it goes up and Down like this like it feels very linear in its path I think I would I would just cheat this a bit more with maybe even like this or it goes Back Into out of the arc where you really stretch out that neck forward so that that black section is here So you really have an arc that then goes Down into that. I think we're spending a bit too much time here It gets a bit slow and it's struggling now if you're if you want to do this because the horse is awkward Then I would do see her because the thing is it's quite You know clean with its moves And even though it stumbles on its face there. It's still With all this feels fairly, you know aggressive and and in control if that makes sense I'm just asking if it are you trying to make this Look at it like it's clumsily trying to turn around Or do you know to do a roll and if so if that's what you're going for That to me it feels like you want to do It's a wider arc with the head go into this and it's almost like you want to It stills all very Fast and like silhouette wise lots of stuff happening with the tail and the legs and the hoofs there So to me it feels almost like you want to go And if you can bring out that shape a bit more so it's less like this but bigger turn So that you can Yeah, you have more room with the legs here It's basically the head legs here legs up here. So it's really clear distinction not so much overlap here But then I would do like one two Not that many just have like a few very clear Struggle, you know moves here and then I will go almost Compress the body into something like this where it gets Down and then out so imagine he goes through and then Try it again Just kind of push and stylize that element a bit more versus just that struggle struggle quick moves Pause and then go might as well go. Oh, this doesn't work work Into this And then you have that I think as you go back here You can have like a slight rotation here in a slight turn and and it's serious in the face. It's almost like Face is ready to go but it long and it's the patient in here and then probably so it's not just this shape Staying put apart from the tail.  Do you have to add one frame? I'm starting to get away from this feels like a 2d car. It's the same pose It's almost like I'm looking at that arc for your pelvis and then What I said at the end Hope that makes sense lots of rambling. I'm trying to figure out the shot Let me know maybe you have some thoughts as well, and that's it. Thank you All right, there's an email you can sign up you can start whenever you want You can submit whatever you want you get 16 submissions either way like and subscribe would be awesome. All right. Thank you