The first full field event of 2022 is coming your way this weekend. It is the Sony Open in Hawaii. We've got some PGA DFS to break down and play for this event and some interesting names in the field. We're going to break down and let you know how to feel about them for PGA DFS. Welcome on into the Heat Check Fantasy podcast powered by Number Fire. That's right here on the FanDuel Podcast Network and NumberFire.com. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for NumberFire.com. Join here as always by Brandon Gadoula. He is the managing editor of NumberFire.com, Brandon, out in Hawaii for the second week of this Hawaii swing. How you do it today? Oh, well, to clarify, I am not in Hawaii. I'm in central Pennsylvania where it's warm. You checked. You looked outside recently. Maybe you've transported, flue powdered. It's not still here, still 11 degrees, but that's up from like eight or nine in the morning. I think the only time of year where I am like, well, I'd love to be where the PGA tour is because the weather is so much better is like right now in January, where it's the only time of year. Yeah, because I'm not that guy who's always like, wow, I wish I was in Florida all the time because I don't want to never want to be in Florida, but like Florida like two times in my life and both times it was 50 degrees. So like kind of what's the point? You know? Well, I know the point. It was like the Daytona 500, but like, you know, outside of that, well, like I'd be like, and it's nothing against Florida, but I was there in like July and I'm from again, Pennsylvania, so it's not a good transition. So if I were there in like March, whenever the PGA tour is there, I could see it. But by March in Pennsylvania, I'm cool like to go outside and like, you know, live in the brisk weather. So really, it's only whenever it's this frigid and they're out in Hawaii that I get that feeling. So that's how I'm doing. I'm just cold. I mean, I am too.  So we're going to pretend we are in Hawaii. We break down this week's event is the Sony Open in Hawaii. We're going to break that down in just one segment first. A quick scheduling announcement because we do have the NFL playoffs coming up this week. We will still have our Thursday preview show coming up shocker on Thursday to get you set for the wild card round of the post season. That'll be a 10 a.m. still over on the Fandal YouTube page. Hit subscribe there. If you're watching right now, hit the like button as well because we do appreciate that. That 10 a.m. on the Fandal YouTube page and up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed after that will break down the Saturday only slate, the Sunday only slate and the Monday single game slate as well. So a lot of good stuff coming up on Thursday all time stands in there. So you can zoop back and forth between the slates as you so desire. We'll talk some about the six game slate. That's weird to say the six game slate to intermittently. But either way, check that out on Thursday. Also, of course, NBA NHL, BFS, Viettaan, Beckio every weekday and Austin Swain talking at some UFC NASCAR just around the corner too. So a lot of good reasons to make sure you are subscribed to the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed wherever you get your podcast. Let's dive in now to the Sony open in Hawaii. It's a YLA country club and it's 7,044 yards. It is a par 70. So a shorter course and a par 70 here this week. There are 144 golfers in the field. The top 65 plus ties make the cut after the first two rounds.  That is not the case this week. You got to prioritize guys who can make the cuts. Brandon, when we're looking for guys who can make said cuts, which stats we prioritize for this week? Yeah. So, uh, while I is a par 70, just over 7,000 yards, that makes it about 160 yards shorter than the average par 70 on the PGA tour. We also have really big greens by comparison to the average average. PGA tour greens are about 6,000 square feet on average. I hate how I got to say average twice. It sounds confusing, but like that's, um, but here we have them at 7,100 square feet. So a bit bigger. We saw bigger greens, way bigger greens than this last week. And we saw what the scoring was like. Uh, but you know, we do have good scoring here as well. In general, uh, the past five winning scores have been 21 under 11 under, which I'll touch on in a second, 22, 17 and 27 with under par, uh, cut lines aside from that, you know, that, that year, two years ago, whenever the winning score was just 11 under. Um, and that this is this, uh, Sony open from two years ago is one that we cite all the time. That's when we had heavy wins and we had Justin Thomas coming in after having won the tournament of champions. He was five to one to win this full field event with a cut. He missed the cut. The wins were just crazy and coincidentally camp Smith won, but point being, um, you know, pretty short, big greens, you kind of need to score. And that's kind of what's getting me on my key stats being stroke scan approach. Um, we've got a four par threes par four scoring 12, uh, par fours this week. Driving accuracy just because distance doesn't rate out a super long. You could go maybe a good drives gained, um, instead of driving accuracy, but point being shorter hitters, more accurate hitters are in play this week and that brings so many more golfers into the mix. Uh, but yeah. So driving accuracy is still kind of one of my key stats, uh, birdie or better rate, and then stroke scan putting on Bermuda. So again, my key stats pretty simple, just approach par fours, accuracy and you know, putting obviously the birdies in there, but, um, and I'm not going to get too, too weird this week with, uh, the key stats. Uh, one thing to note is that the, you mentioned the wind. Back in 2020, wind is very low this week. It's around like max of eight miles per hour. So that should lead to a reversion to the lower scores that you mentioned in 2019, 2021. So I think that that increases the allure of birdies or better games. Um, also tell me if this is dumb. Uh, so for me this week, I'm going stroking off the T because, you know, going through my typical process of seeing who performed well, stroking off the T did stop before accuracy, uh, distance was bad. So like, don't use distance. But like stroke stayed off the T was the key stat that stood out in terms of off the T play. But I think that my overall mentality this week is just downplaying off the T play in general, emphasizing approach around the green putting and stuff like that. Like I'm not disregarding off the T. I am just deemphasizing a bit. Do you buy or sell that approach to this week? Um, I buy it as, as in the fact that it's viable and it's going to get you onto a similar archetype of golfer. Yeah. Um, I don't think that that I wouldn't buy it is, is to say off the T driving totally is irrelevant. Um, but it's more, um, kind of a stat that I would then call like show scheme fairway through green, um, where you basically just take out off the T and I have that in my, in my spreadsheet for, for weeks whenever I think driving is even less relevant than it is this week, but I'm, I'm totally on board, um, with that, whatever your process was. It led us to a lot of the same, uh, same guys this week. But yeah, it's, it's basically like drivers not enough this week. Um, the one thing that I would say is I just never want to, and even though I bumped up the importance of around the green this week, right, never want to get too heavy on around the green because there are, there are only so many strokes you can gain around the green unless you have like four, five, six like pullouts, right? So I think that the way I view it is a bad around the green play is always a red flag. I would just say it's more of a red flag versus an emphasis this week. So like if there is red flag, more of a red flag emphasis, it's in the more of the red flag zone versus the emphasis zone. Like emphasis would be the next step up prioritization would be up, like approach is always prioritization. Um, whereas like all the team may be prioritization and then lowered to like emphasis this week. So it's still above around the green, but like the relative value I'm putting in those two is a lot different than usual. Like I'm still putting more and off the tee, just the gap between the two is lower. Yeah. I mean, yeah. And the more that I've learned over the years with the key stats, I always thought there was like a key stats, like code to break for every course. Um, there really isn't. It's more about kind of getting on the right path and not overthinking it too much. Also still just playing the better golfers overall. Um, so that simplifies it. But if you look at the leaderboard here, even last year in like a weaker field, Kevin, I won Chris Kirk was, I think golfing pretty well then, or that was like the start of a pretty good streak for him. Neiman, I'm nearly won this, uh, the tournament champions, Webb, Leishman, uh, Berger, Moracala, these guys were all top 10. So like you still want better golfers whenever they exist, but we don't have a whole lot of them this week. So take it where you get it though. We'll discuss which good golfers are here and which have done well at Waili in the past in just one second. But first, the World Fantasy basketball championship is scheduled to take place on March 13th, which means there is still plenty of time for you to qualify for the live final to get in on the action and to your best nine men NBA lineups into a WF BBC qualifier finished in first place. Each final is VIP packed includes a trip for two to New Orleans, two luxury box game tickets to the Hornets Pelicans game on March 11th, VIP entry into a special fan event and so much more. The live final will be here before you know it's at afandual.com slash WF BBC today and compete for your chance to party by the bayou. Eligibility restrictions apply. Go to fandual.com or download the fandual app for more details. Let's dig into what golfers have done at this course in the past. We have a lot of course history to dig into, which is a benefit. Now, Brandon, you mentioned back in 2020, Justin Thomas, this is the cut here and Cameron Smith takes advantage and wins. And what do you know Cameron Smith also has won very recently. He's in the field. He is the favorite. He is the highest salary guy. He is the headliner for this week. So talk us through Cameron Smith, both his course history and the current form and what we should think about him for this week. Yes. So I know that we would have talked about Cam Smith. We could talk about him literally anywhere above the bookmaker section. Any thing, anything, which I'm, I'm pretty sure we'll still talk about him in player picks. But I feel like it was relevant to talk about Cam Smith at the top because he's going to dictate a lot of what we do. Not because his salary is so heavy compared to other golfers. He's salary is 12,000. It's just more that, you know, you got to start to think about the game theory angle. Again, the two years ago, I won't say the Justin Thomas or the Justin Thomas thing. You know, again, but it's good to be reminded of the volatility of golf. And, you know, Smith just seems to play really well in Hawaii. So that's kind of the scarier part of like fading him prior to his win. He was 22nd, 18th and 27th. Now, if he finishes 18th and you don't have them in your lineups, that's a win for you. However, Smith's a much better golfer now than he was over those past few years. Again, the form in Hawaii, just really good. That record breaking performance just adds to the fact that over any sample you want to look at, basically, he is the class of this field. So we're looking at like a Justin Thomas light situation where Smith is clearly the best play. It's coming off of a convincing win. We got to figure out what we're doing with Camp Smith.  I think he's still in play for tournaments, even though he is going to be way more popular than his win odds suggest. I still think I would have some shares of Camp Smith just be a little bit underweight. So where are you with Smith right now? So totally agree with the cash game discussion where I think that he is the first guy you put in there, just build around him and be fond of it like you can figure it out from there. For tournaments, I'm more inclined to be even with the field on him and then deviate elsewhere, which is something I'm very comfortable with. If you're like new to the PGADFS podcast, like being even with the field is not a bad thing as long as you're being different elsewhere. And I think for Camp Smith, it actually is justifiable. If he were not like a standout from a quality perspective relative to the field, I would say just be underweight. But I think because he is a standout, I am okay being even. The situation in which I would be overweight is if it were not as volatile of an event where such a large portion of the field can compete. Like if it were a tougher course, I would say be overweight on Cameron Smith because he's so much better than the field. I think that's the key factor that pushes me down to be even. So to me, I would say 40% ish Camp Smith for tournaments, lock him in for cash games and then figure it out from there. I think that's the like sort of very small difference between the two of us mostly philosophical more so than it or difference it is on how we view Camp Smith. Yeah, I hope beyond about 40, maybe 45% of rosters this week, which is a lot. And if you're coming in from like playing NFL and you say someone's 40%, maybe you say that's way too much because football is all tile golf is- People get mad about 20% in NFL. Like people call that shock and I'm like, just calm down. People, yeah, a quarterback, it's like 1250% Oh quarterback, yeah, but like, no, no, I know, but like- A $5,500 feature back running back at 20% like, oh man, can't use that, that's chalk. Yeah, but you know, you might think that that's a great fade because his win odds, even if you use like the sports book odds, which I don't know, would be like 10%. Don't quote me on that. It would be like 12.5, I think. I could be wrong. Oh, I have this. I just didn't have a hold up, 10.5. At plus 850? Oh yeah, sorry, I went the wrong way. Sorry. You can order me. But yeah, okay, so you say, let's round it up. 11% to win, he's gonna be on 40% of lineups. There's a big gap between, like he can still finish top 10, make a ton of birdies, be a great play. He can finish 15th even. I said, if he finishes 18th, it's fine. But he can make a lot of birdies and you can score points with those birdies. So you're basically, it's easy to look at the win odds. You should probably look more like the made cut odds than I have him at like 82% likely to make the cut. So if he makes the cut, he's probably not, he's not probably, he's probably not going to finish like T58, if he's making the cut, he's probably top 20.  Okay, so distance is not as much of a prerequisite this week. So let's have a Web Simpson, because that is typically the course we like to target him at. And shockingly, Webb has done well here in the past. He has played the Sony Open 11 total times. Webb has never missed the cut. He has four top 10s and three of those are top 5s. Interestingly, all three of those top 5s are his past three trips to Wileye. He was fourth in 2018, third in 2020, fourth in 2021. Now, Webb putted really well in all those. We do type, you know, look at that as being a caution for course history, but also it's Webb. He's sixth in the arena putting the past 100 rounds according to Fantasy National. In the most recent event back in 2021, Webb gained 9.8 on approach at the RSM. He finished eighth in that one. So current form, at least current ish form is not bad. He is not low salaried by any means at 11.7, just three to less than Cameron Smith. So Brandon, is that gap too small for you to go Webb, or is he the first place you turn in those 60% where you're not in Cameron Smith? What do you use Webb here? I think Webb's fine. I don't think that he's the first place at look. He might be third, fourth. So I would go Abraham answer, Kevin not over Webb Simpson, which sounds a little potentially silly, but Webb has been really up and down in the current form. 14th at the CJ Cup back in October. And then at the RSM, he finished T8 by leading the field in approach by a really good margin as you pointed out. But then we had the Hero World Challenge, which you can put stock into or not. And I know we don't have shot link data, but we still can generate strokes gain total because that's just your basically your shot differential. I finished 17th out of 20 there was not particularly convincing for me to want to say like, hey, Webb is really sneaking back up. So at the salary of 11-7, I think I'd have to rank him behind answer, Kevin not, probably even Hideki, Sung Jae, maybe Corey Conner. So I don't think I want to get to Webb. I don't think he's the worst play by any means. I think there's enough, but I also don't think there's enough to put him ahead of someone like an answer. So you talked about how we are on a lot of the same guys. I think the one place we may differ is at the top. I think Webb is probably number two for me, outside of Smith, discounting him. He's not in this discussion. I think for me at the top, it's probably Webb and Sung Jae battling for one. And they sound like they're more towards the bottom of your list. Maybe we'll be a little bit different this week than we thought. Maybe. And here's the thing with like PGA DFS golf. Maybe like again, we probably have a lot of people listening this week who are giving it their first try because they're, you know, found the podcast through the NFL board. Yeah. You can get different very quickly because out of the what seven, let's go nine names, Harris English and Up. And I said most of these names. I didn't say like Mark Leishman, that's about it. So like you can pivot so many ways with justifiable options in virtually every field. You can do that in this field, even though Cam Smith's out there, but like I could see myself pivoting to Webb Simpson from answer, even though I have answer higher. Like that's how close it is. It's just more of a preference thing. So I'm not gonna like be goaded into a bet from you, if that's where you're kind of going. Would you do a Sung Jae bet? Sung Jae versus. I don't care. Answer. I'll say you do care.  That's why I was hesitant. Well, sure. Let's do it. Let's do it. All right. Let's do Sung Jae versus answer. Fine. Okay. Start the year off with a bang. This is too good of a bet though. I don't like it. I don't want to. I don't want to forget. Yeah, we need like a. We need some trash. Maybe we can do a, actually no, I think I'm gonna like this next guy. Let's move to the mid-range and you can talk about Charles Howell the third. I like Charles Howell the third. He's kind of interesting. $9,400. Talk me through him. We're not gonna get a bet here. I don't think so. Well, so he's got some form at YLI. That's for sure. 19 times since 2003. In those, he has six top five finishes, nine top tens, no missed cuts. He has as many top fives again, six as finishes worse than 25th. He showed some life in the swing season with the 47th at the Shriners, 33rd at Mayakoba, 16th at the RSM. Over the past six months, Datagolf's true strokes gain query and, hey, he keeps saying this, but like if you're, if you are one of the few, like the one of the people, I don't wanna say a few. If you're one of the people who are just looking at PGA-DFS or PGA betting for the first time, check out Datagolf, go to their strokes gain query and adjust for field strength. It's a little bit sortable. It's free. Yeah, it's. Which is nice. Yes. Best free resource of like any sport that I know of when it comes to DFS in betting. Aside from our content at Number Fire, which. Is it bad that I was thinking he's saying fan graphs, but then I was like, oh yeah, yeah, let's, yeah. But like tools-wise with the adjustments and everything, like with golf specifically, they're probably better tools out there for other sports, but like realistically with golf for free, nothing comes close. But he has ranked 18th in total strokes gained average over the past six months. There's a lot to like, there's not a whole lot to say absolutely not with at 9,400. So are you seeing enough? It sounds like you are on a worry with Hal overall. Me, it's partly the history. It's partly the form. It's also partly that range is bad. Yeah. Like I was going through player picks trying to find a guy in the low 9,000 range to write up and I couldn't. I had to like bump up. I think Howell is like the one guy I got closest to putting down the sheet there because like he checks a lot of the boxes that I want for this week. So yeah, I'll consider him. I prefer a bit to get back up into the like the 9,5,9,6,9,7 range. But like honestly it's fine. If I can't reshuffle my lineup elsewhere and settle for Howell at 94, that's not gonna break my heart. I'm okay with that personally. Yeah, I don't know why he wasn't. So sometimes I look at my process plays and those are my favorite picks because I don't like to look at course history or current form to the point where it's like that's all I'm looking at. But there are some spots where it's like, hey, I'm gonna write up this guy with good course history and then it's like, hey, I should probably like him as much or more than someone who kind of my normal process led me to. Howell's probably in that tier where it's like I'm probably gonna pivot to him over a lot of other options in that range. Yeah, I think I'd agree with that too. Okay, let's talk about Brendan Steele also in that range at $9,600. Steele, form is pretty shaky. Passive shifts to Wileye though to Ben's superb. He was here in 2021 and 2020. Last year he finished fourth. He gained 4.8 on the greens but he was also at 5.2 T to green. Back in 2020, Steele was runner up thanks to gaining 6.4 on approach and six on the greens there. Interesting thing is that his form entering last year's event was actually much worse than it is entering this year. He has lost at least, he had lost at least 8.6 total strokes in previous previous four events entering last year. So entering last year, the form was bad. He still came in, finished fourth, 5.2 strokes gained a green there. He was runner up at the Zozo back in the fall largely avoided imploding elsewhere on the swing season. So is there enough here for you to get on board a Steele at $9,600? I don't think so. Even though we talked about that range being a little bit iffy, I would rank him at least sixth in just the 9,000 range alone. So I think that's gonna be enough for me. I don't really feel like, I don't really feel nervous. I feel more nervous not to have Charles Howell than I do not to have Brennan Steele. I would agree that statement. I would also say that Steele is not my favorite guy in that range. Again, it's not the best range but I think that there are better plays around him. Some of which we'll talk about later. So personally I'm okay not being there. So let's move now to the current form discussion and current form this time of year will always be a difficult discussion to have because for a lot of guys it's the first time they've played since November. Potentially even longer. There are some guys who played last week and I think that is noteworthy to have that form and that read on them recently. We do see a lot of guys. I think it's like 16 out of 23 have won the Sony after having previously played the TOC. I could be very wrong about that anyway. Maybe, I don't know. Either way, we're gonna go through current form. It's a weird discussion this week compared to usual because you don't have a lot of current form. But talk me through Kevin Kisner and what you've seen with him over the past couple of months. I don't know that stat but if you play in the TOC, probably pretty good to have won. So that might be a little bit of like sample bias there but I would not be surprised if knocking off some of that rust helps. Also just playing back to back in Hawaii. But yeah, Kevin Kisner, I can talk about him. Usually when we do the current form section we're looking at guys with really good current form that we're kind of thinking that there's an opportunity to sort of buy low on. You could maybe make that case with Kisner but I think there's a little bit more to it. Kisner's salary is 10,700 and in a field where there aren't a ton of big names, Kisner I think relative to this field is a pretty big name. He started the 2021 season missing the cut at the Shriners, finishing 54th at the no-cut CJ Cup, missing the cut at the RSM Classic, bounced back last week at the TOC with good iron play and better putting. He was third in stroke skin putting in that event. He's got good results while I working backward from last year, 32nd, 4th, 69th, 25th, 4th and 5th but he's in way worse form overall now than he typically has been entering those events and that's something that you wanna look for as well because while there are certain golfers, certain courses we'll see someone come from horrible form, play a course he's usually done well on, play it well again, that's not always going to be the case especially when the form drop off is this significant. However, there was that showing last week with good irons and putting. So I'm probably not there with Kisner. I do think that he'll be a little bit more popular than I would like him to be. So any thoughts for you on Kevin Kisner this week? So circling back to the stat, that's from the PGA Tour first look for the Sony Open. It is 16 out of 23. Sony Open winners have also played since it moved back to Hawaii back in 1999. So 16 out of 23, it's a pretty good number. And that could go well for Kisner but also like there are other guys in the range I like a lot and when I like them a lot it's harder for me to consider a guy who I can nitpick very, very easily. I'm not even sure it's nitpicking honestly with Kisner given the form. So personally, I'm okay avoiding and going to the guys like more in this range one of which is Sheamus Power. We talked about Sheamus Power a decent amount during the swing season. I think you still weren't discussing here at 10-4 despite the fact this range is pretty good. Power, middling last week at the TOC finished 15th there. He was pretty neutral across the board. It's not terrible and it means he has not fallen off a cliff over the break at least. Before then power was cutting it up a bit. He had top 21 finishes in four of his final five events close by 2021 that includes a fourth at the RSM. He gained 6.5 T degree across the measured rounds in that event. Power has been to the Sony four times has never finished better than 49 but his form now is a lot better than it was previously. So the opposite of Kisner here. So what are your thoughts of power at 10-4? So there are some names, some like key check favorites that I do think I prefer to Shamus Power around that range. I guess maybe I can't include Taylor Gutsch at a full 400. That's reasonable that I prefer but I do think that power is like a top 10 play overall. I have a ninth in my combo model which looks at long-term form, relevant stats for this week when simulation stuff. So top 10 there, one of the better values as well. So like nothing against power but this might be a little bit more of like a Web Simpson situation where it's I would rather play Russell Henley rather play Taylor Gutsch might rather play like Cam Davis which is probably a little bit silly but. Would you like Cam Davis or Shamus Power bet if you want that? No, I don't think I get quite there but again, it just more speaks to the preference of or like the kind of modest interest I have in power overall. So Gutsch is in my player picks. Henley I like. So I can't do a bet with those. I like, I could do a co-crack but I'm not sure if you'd do that. Given, it's an around the green week. I don't really think I, we need to talk too much about co-crack but after last week, I think I'm good, fair enough. So not yet not getting a bet there but I think of a little bit higher on power than you. I agree that like he's probably third behind Gutsch and Henley, he's definitely behind Gutsch for me who is 10-8. Henley is 10-6, I believe, is that right? 10-3. 10-3 is lower, yeah. So yeah, I think that he's third in that range that may be high enough if I had to go pretty balanced. But. Yeah, power over Kisner for sure though. Yes, I'd agree with that. Okay, let's move down to some lower salary guys starting off with KH Lee, $8,600. What are you seeing with him right now? Yeah, so again, as you pointed out not a lot of golfers have like tons of recent form just because it doesn't exist but if we are willing to dig back into the swing season then KH Lee looks really good. 33rd at the TOC, so he did play last week. Not great finish but it's tough field was here. That's again, as Jim pointed out, a plus. Finished 14th at the Shriners, 25th at the CJ Cup, 18th at the Zozo. And DataGolf has KH Lee ranked 13th overall and true strokes gained over the past six months. Did miss the cut at YLI two straight years but was 19th here a year ago. He's accurate which is something that I'm looking for. Gets birdie chances, not the best putter so he doesn't always convert those. But I do think for a salary of 86 that does stand out to me. He's not a player pick for me but he might be close. So any thoughts on KH Lee for you? Yeah, I'm not really opposed to him just because again, like things do fall off from you after the mid to high 9,000 range and he does enough to like be totally fine in that tier. So yeah, I think that he's worth considering. I was kind of into Pat Perez before he withdrew. I was not like super into him but I was like, you know, considering him. And I think that losing Perez in that range ups my interest in Lee a bit too. So I think that Lee in the considerations that down there, I would say. Yeah, I had Pat Perez as a like an other to consider in my helper till he withdrew. So I might, I might actually stop and then friend KH Lee. Yeah, I think that that would work for sure. Okay, let's talk about Denny McCarthy. I said the low 9,000 range stinks. It does. One guy who might get bumped up in an event where all the T play matters a bit less and short game matters more, you know, just relatively is Denny McCarthy. He's playing pretty well of late. McCarthy finished 2021 with finishes of 10th, 11th and 15th across his final three events. He gained at least 5.2 total strokes in all three and he was gaining a bit T degree at both the RSM, the Houston Open which doesn't really happen all that often. Obviously McCarthy, not the archetype we typically target. You don't want to rely on short game defeats, but like I think it's different when it's reliable short game and like McCarthy's sample of being very good with the short game is very large which I think needs more dependable than usual. He's getting it done. This course should suit him more than others. Salary is 91. I think the salary aspect is the key portion here because like I can accept more imperfections at 91 especially when they're coming with results. So I'm at least interested in McCarthy. What about you? I guess you didn't scroll far ahead enough then because I'm pretty sure he's a player pick. No, he's not. I was gonna say, I looked at your player picks. He's not. I didn't scroll far enough ahead. You used the other McCarthy in your player picks. I almost. He's his twin.  So he's like kind of, you know, definitely in that conversation for me. Just like, this is a Denny McCarthy type of setup.  He's got that S tier Bermuda putting, which you have to love. And I think if you make the case for Brendan Todd, you have to be okay to make the case for Denny McCarthy. So if you wanna. That's his twin. They're not exactly the same, but there's enough. Denny Todd would be a great name and I would like them to like more. How is Denny Todd not a NASCAR driver? Oh my goodness. We'll work on it. I'll, I'll work on it. I'll get my people on the line to make this happen. But I really think that, you know, you could maybe do some correlation stuff, which probably it might work. I don't know. It's like. I've done that before and it worked really well. Well, it's really hard to test like long-term. But I think. Anacutely. No one's ever gone wrong. Yeah. Based on gut and anecdote that, you know, without data. That's true. But yeah, McCarthy Todd combinations, I think open up a lot. Yeah. And if that is a viable approach to, you know, hit just hit fairways, have good short game to make the cut and score well, then those guys pair well together. Would you do with them with like web? Because it's kind of like a similar. I do like Kevin Na. Or an answer. Yeah. I think like the answer. I think answer is like the new web. Okay. I can get behind that. So I think that like archetype stack makes work or does work if we're gonna, you know, call it that. I think that that would be interesting for sure. So I'm okay with Todd and McCarthy. Typically I'm not, especially in a range that's pretty bad. I think this week is a fine week to do so. Let's talk about the bookmaker odds for this event over at Fandall Sportsbook. Cameron Smith, the runaway favorite. He has plus a 50 at Fandall Sportsbook. It drops a full tier. There are four guys in the second tier. That's web since in a 15 to one. Sung Jaeim and Hideki Matsuyama are 17 to one. Mark Leishman is 19 to one. That's all by another tier drop. Down to Corey Connors at 26. Kevin Na is 29. Abraham Ansar, Harris English, Russell Henley all 32 to one. So you know, Ken Smith is the top. Who is your favorite guy from that second tier? And how far are they behind Smith for you? My second favorite for DFS is Ansar. I would say decently far, but not to the point that when I fade, because I'm not gonna buy Cam Smith in every lineup, Ansar is gonna be my kind of anchor this week. Yeah, I think for me, I'm pretty into Sung Jae. I think the one issue with that is Sung Jae's salary means you have a very similar roster construction to Cameron Smith. So you're losing one of the advantages of not having Smith where you get a more balanced approach because Sung Jae in salary is 11-5. Ansar's 11-3, so it's also kind of a similar discussion. But I think that's the one downside. I think that Sung Jae's game is pretty fun just overall, but also for this event, because he's good around the green. He's a good remuda putter. He's good in approach, gain strokes off the tee. He has experience at this course too. Conn into Sung Jae as being my favorite non-Smith guy. I can get behind that in case anyone's curious because if you match up sports book odds with salaries, you'll see Ansar as an outlier in a negative sense because he's just sandwiched between Leishman and Sung Jae who are 17-1 and Ansar himself is 32. Ansar was terrible at the tournament champions just in all facets, he lost strokes gained. He did switch club manufacturers. He's with Callaway now, which usually is a stay-away kind of a thing for me. However, if we want to talk the anecdotes, I did recommend to Fade Justin Rose once when he switched to Hanma clubs and he went on one the next week. I said to Fade Conmore and Cowell because he switched his putting grip. He won the next week. Jon Roms also switched to Callaway last year. He had a pretty good season if I recall. I'm a little fuzzy there, but it's one of those things where it's like, until we see some life from Ansar, keep fading him, but it also probably is, he's gonna figure out how to use those clubs. It could also just been completely unrelated to the club. So I at least wanted to point that out because Ansar's win odds are noteworthy, noteworthy different than the other guys around him. So I at least wanted to point that out. I think one thing, one difference is that I would be more inclined to bat Ansar than like him for DFS. I did that. Oh, okay. At 32 or what'd you get him at? 30. Okay, nice. That works. Actually, I bet Ansar or not and Taylor Gooch. So I just was in this range with my bets this week. So you're just hating on Ken Smith. I don't think that he is 10.5% likely to win or better. Rude. Rude. Rude. Hey, I recommended him last week. So, uh-huh. Anyway, did he bet him? Sorry, sore subject, my bad. Which golfer's odds have shifted most since things? Did you pull like right after the Bryson withdrawal? Cause I feel like that's the most noteworthy time to note here. I mean, there were so many withdrawals. I did my best here. I mean, Ches with Drew, which changed everything. That's true. Once Ches with Drew at 90 to one, everyone just went crazy trying to figure this thing out. But- Got Perez too at like 160 or 120, yeah. Yeah. Those are the key points. Yeah. But no, Ken Smith stayed pad at 850. I didn't see him lower than that or higher than that at all. I think he was plus 950 when Bryson was in there. Okay. Cause I had him at 850 with Bryson in there. Okay. I think. Okay. So maybe he, either way. Yeah. Sputton hairs there at that point when it comes to applying that to DFS. But I have Mark Leishman from 19 to 17, Corey Connors from 29 to 26, Kevin Kisner and Taylor Gutch from 36 to 34, Charles Howell and Joel Damon, 75 to 55. So big, big movement there for some guys in the mid 9,000 range. I'm good with Damon this week for sure. K.H. Lee, big move, 160 to 90. And then Zach Johnson, 120 to 90. I looked into Zach Johnson for a very long time and gave some strong consideration to him. Couldn't quite pull the trigger on making him a player pick, but like I thought about it for a while. What's your read on him? I think he's fine. There is a cluster of golfers from like just 89 to 86. No, I was gonna say like, well, okay, let's do 86 to 9,000. There are like a dozen golfers that I could see. It would be like, sure, basically. The number of names I had briefly on our sheet as a player pick down there. I mean, Perez was one, he withdrew, but like there were a couple others who I was like, oh, okay, I could talk about, let me give you an example here. I had, I had Kassair briefly, I think. Aaron Rye, I do have on there. Zach Johnson, I thought about. Stewart, I think I have on there right now. You do, cause I do as well. Perez, thought about Lee. So yeah, it was like half a dozen names actually. Like, at least. Grilo. No, I didn't, you did. Yeah, you can have Grilo if you want, that's fine. But like, no, none of them stand out. And whenever you have that many and you can't figure out who's the one, it's kind of too many, which doesn't make them bad plays. It just makes it really hard to hit on the right plays if you don't have that conviction. So I'm not out on ZJ, but again, I say this stuff a lot with golf cause there are so many golfers to consider. It's like, I'm not going to talk you out of him, but I myself probably not going to get there and I'm just being transparent on that one. Other movement things you noted, Damon, I like Damon too, we'll talk about them later, but I think it's how moving is also nothing to up the confidence in the DFS perspective. Okay, similar mindset here, which lower salary golfers have odds? Currently, that's enough to you. There's just two buckets at 90 to one and 120 to one. If you look at golfers with salaries of 9,000 or below, we've got like seven here who are 90 to one. Emiliano Grillo, Patton Kazaier, Stuart Sink, Zach Johnson, Aaron Ray, Tom Hogi and K.H. Lee. I'm good with all of those guys, but Stuart Sink to some degree. And then at 120, and again, these guys aren't even like upper sevens or low eights. They're all 86 or above. Robert Twohand Streb, Brian Stewart, Henrik Norlander, Russell Knox, Adam Long. I much prefer Stuart to anyone else in that tier, but like a lot of names down here you could really consider. Yeah, I think that it's reassuring, but it does not make it easy to make a player picks down there, which we will do in just one second. My first quick note on the weather for this week, as mentioned before, it's pretty calm for this event. That's not always a case at a Y-Li, so I think that's pretty noteworthy that it's calm. It may lead to better scoring for this week, which leads to more volatility, but also increases the allure of findings and birdies out there. So take note of that before you fill out your lineups. So let's go now and run through our player picks here for the Sony Open in Hawaii, starting off with you, Brandon. Who are you targeting for this week over on TheFanDuel.com? At TheFanDuel. Should I say Cam Smith? Or should I, okay. I'll say Cam Smith. I think he's just the best process play. I have him at 7.9% likely to win, which again, doesn't make him a good win bet for me, but nobody else is above 4.5%. Only Webb is above 4%, and if I was the type of person who would just like manually adjust the things more, that would probably be lower for Webb, just because of the up and down that I've seen from him, but again, Cam Smith, basically, twice as likely as anyone else to win. The salary doesn't really reflect that. 98th percentile, golfer in adjusted stroke, scanty to green and putting, which are my numbers that adjust for recency and field strength over the past year. It's really hard to top that. So, you know, you can get cute in tournaments, but I don't think that you avoid Cam Smith by any means in your head to heads. And that's why I have him as my top player pick as well. He is coming off a win at the TOC. He's one of the guys where you know he is in form, and I think that that is, I mean, honestly, I do think that it's worth a bit more this week than it typically is. He is leading every area outside of all the T-play, which matters less to me this week. He is a former winner at this course. I think you just build around him and go elsewhere from there. We talked about the other guys you liked here. So if you're looking for tournament stuff, Answer is a guy Brandon likes. I like Sung JM. I do like Webb as well. So you've got tournament options outside of Cameron Smith. I think you have about 40% in tournaments personally. Brandon is a bit lower than that, but I think either way, you Smith in cash games, bit more thought goes into it for tournaments. Yes, I would also throw Kevin Na in that conversation as my tournament pivot. Yeah, I think that he deserves to be in there too. Okay, other high salary guys you like, looking at that like second tier in the 10,000 range, who stands out to you there? Russell Henley, a big heat check, long time heat check superstar for us, 10,300, Rosa knows. I'm only just a fan. She's like that. That was not a happy bark. She's like, that's a name I haven't heard in quite some time. Yeah. She leans back, takes a toke of a cigarette and oh yes, Russell Henley, yes, the hen dog. Yes, well she, well actually she's probably not old enough to remember his win at YLI, but we haven't seen him lately. So I guess that kind of fits. But that's just the case for a lot of golfers this week. His past two results were a T7 at Houston, T22 at the RSM, based on good all-around game. Plenty of fairways hit. Just a good setup for him. So I like Henley kind of a lot and I think he's a lock for our head to head this week. Yeah, I thought that I had Henley two in this range and I think I still do, but it's a very close two behind Taylor Gooch, who is my second high salary guy. He is a middling salary for someone who beats everywhere except off the tee. He ranks third in approach to past 50 rounds according to Fantasy National. He's third around the green. He was fine in the tournament champions, but that means we've seen him recently actually gained 1.4 off the tee there, which might be the best Taylor Gooch has ever done his entire life. He has gained five or more in approach in four of his past eight measured events. The approach play is sick, was decent off the tee last week. He's good around the green too. I think he's well worth 10-8. I think to me it's Gooch, Henley, and then power my ranking of the guys in the 10,000 range for this week. Any final thoughts for you in the 10,000 range? We're good to move on. Why are you going on Taylor Gooch's off the tee numbers? Because they're not great, but he didn't deserve it. They're not good. They're not good. Well, Gooch and Henley- I'll text them an apology later. My best friend, Taylor. Yeah. I'll also ask them to please keep the Y out of your name because I love one last letter to type spelling out Taylor Gooch. Okay. Let's move to the mid salary, guys. Who are you targeting there? I have Joel Damon. I think we're gonna get a Damian performance this week. Ultimately did underwhelm with the TOC, but he was kind of at times flashing. If you go back through the stats, and I really don't look like round by round stats because it's not very predictive and you want that sample to build up, but basically had his irons one day, didn't have the wedges, didn't have the putter like different days. Like it just kind of didn't work out for him, but played here or not, played in Hawaii last week, which again is a good sign. Salaries really reasonable at 9,500. 96% tile and birdie or better rate gained over the past 50 rounds, according to fantasynational.com. 87th percentile and fairways gained as well. And then in my adjusted ball striking numbers, 86th percentile in this field. So I like Damian, he's probably gonna finish like, I can't really say that, but he's got two top 25s on his past two tries here. So probably just gonna do it again. I am also on Joel Damian. It is a little bit nerve wracking given that it is a field where, or an event where emphasizing short game a bit more, but at least one part of the short game for Damian seems to be getting a little bit better. He's actually gained at least 1.8 strokes putting in four of his past six measured events. He gained four strokes putting in two of those. He also gained at least 1.8 in two, or lost at least 1.8 in two. So he can still lose strokes, but the ability to hit the highs is good. We talked about that a lot, where if you're a bad putter, but you can have spike weeks, that is a lot better than being like, consistently a bit below average, because I want that volatility in order to capture some upside. I think that's good for Damian. He's just calling more cow, that's it. Also like he knows he's not great as a putter, and I think that that like is, I don't know, it doesn't have been on a whole lot, but like, you know, like he talks about it. I think that's nice. Yeah, I love Joel Damian, so. He's great, yeah. 36th off the tee, 17th in approach. He's done well here in the past, even despite having some issues with the short game. So I think Damian is worth a shot for sure at $9,500. Who else do you like in the mid-range here? Brendan Todd, 93, coming off of a missed cut, which happened before Thanksgiving, so I don't know if you were like, say that he's coming off of anything. Coming off-ish. Didn't putt well, which is definitely not what you expect from Brendan Todd. He's in the 98th percentile in Bermuda putting, which I would classify as S tier just to tilt Jim. What's the cutoff like for S tier? I think S tier is probably like 95th percentile and better, and then your A tier, but like after that. All right, fair enough. But usually, my honest cutoff's usually like 98th percentile, which he is, so. Okay, Todd or McCarthy? Todd. Okay. Brendan McCarthy or Denny Todd? For name value, just like, which is better? Well, for like what type, if we're talking like athlete? Plumber. Brendan McCarthy sounds like a butler actually, so we're gonna cross him off. Yeah. Okay. I was also very close to Brandon McCarthy, who is a former Major League Baseball pitcher and was awesome. Awesome, at least on Twitter. Okay, so we're gonna go Denny Todd, I think. Wasn't he like the, isn't he like the Max Homa of like Twitter? Kinda, yeah. I think I'd buy that cop. Just seems like a good dude. So I like Brendan McCarthy. Brendan McCarthy, definitely a butler, but Denny Todd, stud NASCAR driver. My second mid-range guy is Maverick McNeely. He is actually higher salary than Damon, but I wanna talk about Damon first since you had talked about him, so I'll just make it congruent. McNeely is 98. He is surged in the swing season, but measures up well when you adjust for competition. He ranks ninth in DataGolf's true strokes gain query the past six months. A lot of that is due to off-the-tea play, but he also did gain 4.8 on approach at the Houston Open. He can have pop weeks as a putter, which is good. Talk about that with Damon before. Not as good on Bermuda as other surfaces, but could be due to like small samples there. So I think that McNeely works a lot at 98. What are your thoughts on Maverick McNeely for this week? Like him a lot. I think there's gonna be big things from McNeely this year. He's kind of one of the guys I'm watching. He's just got to get the irons dialed in, but he's got distance in birdie potential, which I know we're not looking for distance, but it's never a bad thing to have distance. So he rates out, honestly, as one of the better plays for me, even at 98. But more realistically, I will play like a Joel Damon, often simply because of the salary savings to help me get back up away from that 8,000 range. I think that makes sense. Okay, let's finish with the value plays for this week. Who stands out to you at $9,000 or lower? I'm gonna go Emiliano Grillo on 9,000, exactly 90 to one to win. Look, Grillo's got his ups and downs for sure, but there's also, there are weeks where you would consider Grillo more than others. I think this is probably one of those weeks where you'd consider him more than others. 92nd percentile in adjusted approach play over the past year, accurate driver, tons of birdie chances. I know that I'll need to make those in order to make the cut, but as much as I'm cool with like a Danny McCarthy type play, I think a Grillo really fits this week as well because he should definitely have birdie chances. Considering offering a Grillo versus McCarthy bet. I would not do that. Okay, I tried. That would seem like super like, like 2016 gym would have been angry at the thought of that. Yeah. 2022 gym has been radicalized by being burned by the Grillo. Yeah, I considered it. Couldn't quite get there. But you know, I'm not on Grillo this week personally, just because if I'm bumping up short game, I it's tougher to get there, which seems hypocritical because Aaron Rye is my first lower salary play in the short game. Does seem to be an issue for him, but the approach play might be good enough for him to still be in play. Basically new Grillo question mark. Rye's at 0.83 a stroke scheme, T-degree per round over the past six months, according to data golf's true stroke gained. He's losing 0.45 on the green. So that ain't great. That could be an issue here, but he's roughly neutral around the green, which helps. So one area of short game is not gonna hurt him too much, $8,900. I'm okay giving a Rye a swing here. What about you? Yeah, I was trying to search for him in my spreadsheet and I typed RYE because it's how you say his last name. And I was like, what am I missing here? But yeah, I think that he's in the conversation. I know that he's got the good approach numbers probably because he uses iron covers, but it's for a good reason. So anyone who's like vehemently anti-iron cover, it's because his dad told them to cherish the things that he has. So that's probably like the only reason to justify iron covers. Sorry if anyone listening uses iron covers, but just if you see him out there, don't tweet at him and be like, hey man, iron covers aren't cool. Just let everyone do what they wanna do if it's not hurting you. But either way, Aaron Rye for me was a consideration. I didn't quite get there, but I definitely see the case for him. Yeah, I think that he's pretty interesting. So I'm on board with him. It's probably stupid to go with him over Grillo because like, I think best case, not best case scenario, but like the 75th percentile outcome is like he's Grillo where he's really good T to green and struggles on the greens, but like I still think that I am okay with more uncertainty. I don't want the known bad with the short game with Grillo, whereas with Rye, it's like probably bad, but maybe not. Who knows? Would you bet me? No. See, I think the thing, I'm falling behind again in bets already. It's eight to four already this season. What's our head to head? I totally forgot, like, I have no idea. Four to three, me. Okay, that's better than I thought it was. For some reason, I thought that I was getting crushed probably because it was occurring in St. James NFL where I was getting crushed. Claude back a bit, not going to lie, but you still want to get 11 to six, something like that. 11 to seven? With your week this week, you probably demolished me in week 18. I beat you by five points this week in our head, yeah. Well, that's wild, but honestly, we both did pretty well. That was wild, but yeah. It'd be an 11 to seven. Yep. Devon double-tutty is welcome to my hot tub that I don't have at any time. Who else do you like in the lower salary range? I think we're going to have a shared interest down here, Jim and Brian Stewart at 87. We're on the same page. Super short driver, but super accurate driver, good overall short game, fits that like Brian Stewart, Danny McCarthy, Brendan Todd, Abancer kind of build, and I might just end up doing that. Let's do it, let's do it. Okay. Do I do McCarthy and Todd or we just do one? Well, a glut is to do two. Is it? I mean, if the case is to like get back up to some more accurate, like thuds. Is it still not good? No, it's fine. It gets you a web and answer pretty easily, which is nice. So I think this works. Oh, it's all right. I'd still rather go, I'd probably go Sung Jae over web. For that type of archetype? Yeah. No, Sung Jae's too good off the tee. We're going with just bad off the tee only. I mean, you're not, no, they can't be good.  Web is not bad off the tee. Who invited you? He's not bad off the tee. Kevin Na is bad off the tee like comparison. All right, okay. You cannot rank better. Oh, answer's 11th. No, maybe I have to kick answer off. Maybe answer's too good. I don't know. It's Corey Connors is the best. He's got the best adjusted off the tee. He's also super accurate and not long. Okay, so I'm kicking off answer. Answer's been kicked off the island. Get out of here. Okay, so Stuart, Todd, Todd, Todd, Todd, Todd, Todd. RC, web, Sanjay, 97. Can get a little hairy. I could that. No, no, I think I want to go those five and then just like give it double barrel middle fingers and go Keith Mitchell. I was gonna say go Joel Damon there to balance out everything. Yes, this is good. Okay, anything else to say about Brian Stewart? No. Okay, he's 48th in approach, 18th around the green, solid putter. He'll put it on the fairways. So I think that he is a good pick as well in the upper high 8,000 range. Upper high is double. The mid to high 8,000 range, I think that he works pretty well there. I am rusty on PGA terminology after having taken off like the past, whatever it is decade it feels like at this point. So forgive me with the salary terminology. We'll figure it out and improve. We're gonna go back to the work. We're gonna watch the film. We're gonna grind it out and just evaluate ourselves before we can evaluate others, you know? Yeah, forgive me. I forgot how numbers work over the break. They're hard, man. I don't know. Sue me. Anyway, okay, those are our player pick. Let's do some win picks here for the Sony open in Hawaii based on the current odds over a fan dual sports book. I'll refresh right now to make sure I have the best ones. You can go first. If you want answers, since you already bet him, you can take him. It's just really between Kevin not answering Gooch for me because I've bet all those guys. So I'll probably go Kevin not and I'll go answer. But I wouldn't hate Taylor Gooch either, like I said. Let me scroll back up here. I'll take Gooch then. Do you have Kevin not answer you said? Yeah. I'll take Gooch. And you know what? Let's do it. Shameless power, gonna win the Sony open in Hawaii this week. What? For your picks for Houston. I wasn't the same. Sam Burns, Shameless power for the RSM. Louis Weasley, Shameless power. You have like this, you're like magnetized to Shameless power and you don't even realize it. And my wife's last name is Powers. Like is that, is that why? I bet that's it, yeah. Okay. He was fourth at the RSM. That doesn't cash in outright ticket, but. You know, but we're in the hunt. One of the Barbasol, we didn't talk about that. So, you know, my long lost cousin, Shameless power. Can I play that angle? Well, how's your long lost cousin? I'm married in, you know. And the names are different for like the close enough. Probably like somewhere in the distance, I don't know. Hey man, who could say? Not I, not I said the cat. That is all that we have here for this week, Brandon, any final thoughts for you before we send the good people off to fill out their lineups to the Sony open in Hawaii? If you're gonna play like 10 or five or 10 lineups, try not to get like, I know we talked about a lot of golfers, just try to narrow it down so that you don't have like one or two shares of literally every golfer. Just narrow it down even if you're not certain. You just gotta do that over a handful of lineups. Yeah, commit to guys. It's going to lead to volatility, but it's a volatile sport. You're kind of signing up for that at the beginning. So, be okay with bad outcomes. They're gonna happen. That's true across all of the FS sports. Don't worry too much about floor. You know, just make sure that when you are right, you are in position to benefit from being right. I think that's the way that I'd phrase it. That is all that we have here for today on the PGA podcast. But as mentioned, we are back here once again on Thursday to get you set for all three slates on the wild card round of the playoffs. Again, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, with some discussion of the six scheme slate. The six scheme slate offerings are a lot better this year than they were last year. I'll say that. So, we'll sprinkle in some talk on that throughout the podcast as well. That is Thursday at 10 on the FanDuel YouTube page. Hit subscribe there. And also hit the like button for watching YouTube. Thank you to those of you who have done so already. And hit subscribe on the Number Fire Daily Fantasy podcast feed wherever you get your podcasts. Brandon, if people have questions for you on Twitter, where can they find you there? I'm at Goodwill13, G-D-U-L-A-1-3. And I'm at Jim Sonnis, G-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. You can also follow the FanDuel Podcast Network at FanDuel Podcast. Big thank you to everyone for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your PGA DFS lineups. We'll talk to you once again next week. This has been the Heat Check Fantasy podcast powered by Number Fire.


I want now to turn to you, Mr. Narendra Tajajna, Chairman of the Independent Energy Policy Institute of New Delhi, founder, president of the World Energy Policy Summit. Please, the floor is yours. Thanks, Chair, for the opportunity. And since the theme of our team, you know, we are focusing in this conference more on global governance, and that's precisely what I'm trying to, you know, in the context of energy, of course. You see, until very recently, if you go by statements coming from top leaders in the OECD countries, most particularly like the United States, and they all were used to say that energy policy and climate policy are two sides of the same coin. The big statement by Mr. John Kerry when he was Secretary of State of the Munich Security Conference, and I was sitting in the fifth row, and I was very happy, and I made a big note of it, and I repeated that at least in 20 conferences. But now, we don't hear it anymore. Now they say the climate is different and energy is different, or they just go silent on it. You see, when you look at the climate, like COP summits and other platforms under the UN and all that, we by now have created a kind of a global governance structures and some infrastructure, and some rules. So there is a kind of global governance emerging as far as the, you know, climate is concerned. But the way we look at it from Asia, you know, we are sitting in Asia by the way, majority of you are from different, mostly OECD countries, but Abu Dhabi is in Asia as you know, and I come from, this is Delhi, which is just three hours away from here, by air. And now we see that, you know, when it comes to energy, even to talk about building some kind of, you know, governance is unacceptable. I have proposed it in five different conferences, last 12 months, in Western Europe. They don't even want to listen to you. Who are you, what are you talking, you know? And that's very unhealthy. You, if, and I strongly believe in this, energy policy, energy security, climate policy, climate security are two sides of the same coin. If we're rejected, we are compromising with our future. I mean, the OECD countries or the so-called Global North is very happy to build that kind of thing for climate. But for energy, no. The most optimistic people within the Global North, if you talk about building such a, you know, order, they say, oh, we have got international energy agency. But I say, haven't you read the constitution of the international energy? India and China can't be members. And there are many within IEA. Some of you may disagree. They don't want India and China to be kind of full-fledged members. IEA has a different DNA with all due respect. So now you see the problem we have, we face when we look at, at the same time, when you look at the global GDP, energy occupies huge space. In India, for instance, when you look at the energy sector, it's roughly 23% of India's GDP of 3.5 trillion on nominal basis. And if you go PPP basis, India's economy is roughly $8.6 trillion. Oil and gas alone is about 15%. And we are heavily dependent, like in India, on imports. 86% of oil we import. 60% gas we import. Nuclear, uranium we import. And solar, we are emerging as a major solar power, solar energy power. But 90% of the equipment are imported, mostly from China. So therefore, you know, I mean, we keep talking about, and I personally am always pushing for it, that we need to build some kind of global energy governance. Yes, there is OPEC. OPEC is a cartel. IA, yes, it takes care of the OECD's country's interest. And there are a few others for renewables and international energy forum and so forth. But the point is that, you know, unless and until we agree, now the biggest challenge today is that majority of people, majority of OECD countries are not open to have even a discussion on this issue. How can you build a kind of sustainable climate global governance without building a sustainable energy global governance order? How can you do that? I don't really see it happening on a sustainable basis. You can build it, but then you will face challenges. And we are already facing these challenges, you know, since the Ukraine war. Now, the point I'm trying to drive home is that look at, for instance, the present crisis. There is no global governance for energy. There is no organization for that.  Ukraine war happens and look at the reaction of, for instance, Europe. The immediate first reaction of Europe is that they have started building, my friend may not agree with me, but building kind of energy fortress for Europe. Concern is Europe. Build a fortress. Go to Canada with a huge delegation, the German Chancellor. Go to Saudi Arabia. Go to Qatar. A ship that, LNG ship that was going to empower Bangladesh was only 200 miles away from LNG import terminals in Bangladesh was rivaled to Germany. What are we talking about then? And you think that we can build a sustainable, you know, global climate governance? How? And you think you build an energy fortress for Europe, and you'll be fine. And if India buy a few drops of more oil from Russia, you spend half of your energy just, you know, taking India to task. Not mentioning China even once, which imports much more. Or Europe. What India has imported the last five months, six months from Russia, you know, what Europe has imported from Russia the last eight months, it will take us five years to import that kind of quantity. But silence. Because we are global north. We are rich. Don't question us. Forgetting one thing. If you look at data, look at statistics, look at honest studies, the global energy gravity center has already moved to Asia. It's no longer in the Atlantic. Just go by data. Look at the major, where the majority of consumers. So what is this approach? You don't, can't even have conversation on this. When I come to conferences, especially in Europe, I find that you are sitting in an echo chamber. They're very happy if you are kind of talking, they're happy talking to each other.  Or you're just ignored, sometimes even ignored by the moderator. Can't we have honest conversation? Don't you want to prepare for the new world that is emerging? The new kind of global governance order that is emerging? A new energy order which has started emerging. This energy order that we have got actually came into being in the early 1970s. It's the first time it has been challenged, seriously. Now the point is all I'm trying to say is that we need to kind of have conversation. Just building a fortress for Europe is not going to help because it's not sustainable. Depriving poor Bangladesh is not going to buy more gas and store it. Store it, by the way. And you feel you're going to be secure forever. What is this mindset? What is this mindset? So these are the questions we need to ask. Put on the table. And we won't need to have conversation. No point sitting in echo chamber talking to yourself that if we can protect Europe and America, NATO Secretary General Mr. Stoltenberg, a couple of months ago I listened to his press conference, CNN, he is Secretary General of NATO. With all due respect to him, and I happen to know him personally because I've spent many years of my life in Norway. I knew even his father. Now he mentioned energy security record nine times in a press conference of 35 minutes. And he said, I'm going to go to the Secretary General. And there were people in the room, in one of the conferences I was recently, they said we need to build energy in NATO. Energy in NATO. Now what are we talking about? Are we kind of planned to push these 6 billion people or 6.7 billion people who live in the global south to some other planet? How do we go there? It's not happening. All that we can do is to have, you know, a conversation and build our kind of energy future in such a way that we can do it. Let me come to energy transition. What is energy transition? What is so new about it? Energy transition has been happening for 200 years. In India we used to run, you know we are a railways country, we used to run trains, actually we use wood as a fire for the steam engine. Then came coal. Then came electricity. Now we are even thinking and looking at using wherever we can, for instance, LNG. What we are basically need to look at is energy transitions. Transitions.  In Germany they may do it faster. Good luck to them. In Norway they may do it even faster. Very good luck to them. But in India and some other economies, it may take longer. It may take 30 years, may take 40 years. Even Germany, they created an energy model and they talked about it globally. They sponsored so many conferences all around the world. Here is the German energy model. What happened to that? Where is that? Has it gone on holiday? Now those are the questions we need to ask.  Global energy narratives. Whether on climate or on energy. Where these narratives are a constructed. Where? And then, if you are a smaller economy, then push down through your throat. You have to accept them. We saw in Paris Climate Summit, there were 60 countries against something, a resolution. Overnight they all started supporting. We know what happened that night. Now the point I'm trying to derive from is that when it comes to building global narratives for climate, for energy, this has to be, the whole process needs to be democratized. This process is monopolized by the global north. Yes, you have great think tanks. Yes, you have great people. Yes, you have many private concertencies also. They can do that. They can write better. The English is better. The grammar is better. The German may be better and so on and so forth. But aren't we kind of share the same planet? Can't we have more consultations? Can't we help developing countries, some of those countries that are not as big as India, China, develop this capability and then capacity so that we can have a more democratic kind of process to build this global narrative? You build narratives. You control CNN. You control BBC. You control what is the German channel called B.A.V.L. or something, whatever. So now the point is that, you know, and then is disseminated globally. We got to kind of, we need to democratize it. If you, the whole process, climate and energy are too, if you ask me today the biggest challenges for the humankind, we need to democratize the whole process. And at the same time, you know, we need to, the time has come. My sense is the time has come whether you're global north or global south, whether you're very rich or very poor, somebody who's very rich can become very pure in 50 years from now. India can become a 32-dollar economy in 30 years according to PWC, not me, and so on and so forth. But the point is these things keep changing. Those who are, those of you who are familiar with history would know that from 180 till 18 and at 26, India and China were the biggest economies on the planet. India and China together accounted for 53% of global GDP. It changed, you know, after India became a colony, Britain and so on and so forth. Now, and this may change again. Who knows, in 30 years maybe sooner. Now the point here is that we need to kind of sit together, build these narratives together. And also the last point I want to kind of put on the table is that, you know, we have got global intergovernmental organizations for everything. Health and education and you name it, trade and whatnot and whatnot, which is great. We need that. Now we are also building this kind of, you know, framework and infrastructure for climate, which is superb. We need it. But how can we leave energy which is the most important part of the whole story out of it? Why there is no intergovernmental organization, global organization dedicated to energy? So that if there was some crisis, let's say post Ukraine, we could have a kind of like energy security council or something like that and discuss this issue so that Europe didn't have to build a fortress at the cost of Bangladesh, poor Bangladesh. Now my point is that why can't we have a global, I put this on the table for discussion and also that north or south, global north or global south, we need to kind of, you know, have conversation and create, build a new organization with all due respect to IEA. And new organization which is intergovernmental, truly global, you know, dedicated to energy and preferably, preferably headquartered in a country or in a area or in a geography which is now the new gravity center of the global economy. I just put it on the table. And I'm just having, I'm speaking from my heart, I was carrying some notes, I've ignored my notes and I know that I'm in a minority in most places but we are meeting in Asia, this is the new gravity center and so I've been extremely honest and if you agree with it, it is fine but if you don't, at least I have put it on the table and I feel happy about it. Thanks for your attention. Thank you very much for your insightful comments. I would like to hear you or do you have some reactions or questions? Yes, please sir. Thank you for your perspective on the global south and the need for global governance. I would like to say that, you know, the COPS meeting are a dialogue for all countries and there's been an immense failure when you think that since we have COPS meetings we have broken CO2 concentration in the atmosphere records every year, every year. So if I may suggest that before we think of dialogues and governance and everything else, we should think of innovation and what is the South's part in new innovation for energy? That is the key. My experience is that I reached out to the BABA Research Institute for Nuclear Energy in India and they told me that they cannot work with private enterprise. You have to be a public enterprise. That's the only country where I have that problem. So I put it back to you. If you want the global south to be part of the solution you have to change the way things work for innovation, not just for dialogues, more innovation and I think India has immense resources, intellectual resources. It's proven all around the world but the structure of policy making in India is a problem for innovation in many ways, especially about energy and in particular about nuclear energy which is part of the solution. Thank you. Can I reply? Thank you, sir. Please. Very quickly. You see, first of all, I was talking of the whole world. I was not thinking only of India when I spoke but coming to your point, yes, I agree with you on innovation across global south and also across global north. I deal with both. I spend nine years of my life in Europe. Very familiar with global north. Travel all the time. Yes, BABA Atomic Center, you said they might have this thing but there are lots of other institutions. There are lots of other private sector companies now venturing into nuclear power. And so there are many others. If you want, I can give you a few references but this particular institute might have its own policy. It's the oldest one, by the way. It's the oldest one. It was created at the time when, you know, I mean, India was, there are many countries who basically would object every time we drew something in the space of energy even for peaceful purposes. So it's a legacy institute you're referring to, legacy center. So it might have its own old mindset but BABA Atomic Center is not the only place in India. You're talking of an ocean. India is an ocean. What you talked about is this very, very tiny little island somewhere. Yes, but I agree with you that even that island needs to change. I will convey this thing to the concerned minister at least. Thank you, sir. Friedberg, you want to say something? Friedberg Flüger from Germany. I think he was exactly right. I agree very much with what Narendra said. Pardon? It doesn't work? Closer. Okay. So I think Narendra did very well. Let me explain why I believe this. Looking to the United States, and we haven't discussed this so far, they came up with the so-called IRA, Inflation Reduction Act, 370 billion they put into climate neutral technologies, subsidize them, and that will lead to a situation that all those technological innovations, be they nuclear or CCS in every case, will be sucked off by the United States. We see that already when it comes to e-fuels, to hydrogen, that projects that have been designated for other parts of the world now go to the United States because this is such a huge program. And I would really share this fear of a fortress Europe. LNG was discussed. Yes, my country has a lot to do with the problems that we have right now because we saw the reliance on Russian gas and we didn't do anything against it. Why didn't we do this? Because it was in the interest of our economy. It was the only way, by the way, that the German energy intensive industry could survive because US LNG, LNG from other parts of the world was much too expensive. We would not have been able to keep competitiveness. But nevertheless, we believe that we are responsible for large parts of that situation. And now what we do, and that is double standards, and I fully agree, we suck all the LNG in the world market because we can pay better than the Bangladeshis, than the Egyptians. So all the LNG that is out there comes back to Europe. What happens? Those countries go back to coal. That's bad for climate, and it's bad for international relations because exactly that feeling amounts. And if we then go to Sharm el Sheikh as Germans or Europeans, Mr. Timamats, EU Vice President, and teaches other countries and say, well, you should do better on the climate front. While we just have pushed them again back to coal, it's absolutely unacceptable. And therefore, I have full understanding for this, in my point of view, wrong approach to take out climate and believe we could do every year more ambitious goals, better ambitious goals for every sector, and not see what that means for the energy world in the whole. So I fully applaud with you, and we should really think of building an institution which combines climate and energy. One could not have said that better than you, Narendra. Thank you very much. Mr. Friedberg has a will to include the private sector in the dialogue, otherwise we see that it doesn't work.


What's up, everyone? It's Hakedown here. Welcome back to another video. Today, I'm actually gonna be doing a requested video, and that is how to start a reselling business. Let's get right into this. So I have been reselling for about three years now, and I did start out small, and I did expand my business little by little. I currently sell on Facebook Marketplace, Kijiji, and eBay, but whenever I started out, I was only starting out, I think, with Facebook and Kijiji, and then I advanced a little by little until now how I do it, which is also including eBay. When you're starting out, you obviously do need some stuff to sell. Now, it doesn't take a lot of money, but you will need some money to start. After you buy a few things to resell, once you sell them, I recommend just taking that money, investing it in more items to sell, and just keep that trend going up until you have it to the points where you can profit and take some of that money and put it in your pockets instead of always putting that money back into the business, which unfortunately may take a while, because whenever you're first starting out, it is very time-consuming learning everything, learning what to do, how to do it, what to sell, what works for you. It does take a lot out of you, so it will take time before you're actually pocketing some of the money, but eventually you will get there, but literally, whenever you're starting out, buy a couple things to sell. Once you sell them, take that money you made, including the profits, and invest it in more items to sell, and more items to sell, and more items to sell. I also recommend selling stuff that you know. For myself, when I started out, I was started out with video games, and now I mainly focus on video games and comic books because that's the market that I know, that's how I know how to sell. That's easier for me to look up to see whenever I'm looking for things to buy, what's more valuable, and anything that I don't know, it's easier for me to research because I'm researching something that I already know. So whenever you're starting out, try to find and think of things that you enjoy in life, and then that will be easier for you to realize what you need to sell in those categories.  At first, whenever it comes to buying inventory, you can check out simply, yard sales, thrift stores, flea markets, you can even check Facebook Marketplace to see if you can get some great deals that you can purchase those items to flip for profit. Whenever you start out, start out small, and as you gain experience and gain knowledge, then you'll know what to look for in these certain places. For example, for me, whenever I go into thrift stores, I mainly focus on the things that possibly could be big ticket items. I don't look at DVDs or CDs anymore. I don't even look at books anymore. I look at mostly video games and consoles and the odd and items. For example, I did recently purchase a Disney piggy bank. Now this thing here wasn't even ceramic or glass. It was just plastic, but I paid $6 or $7 for it, and it's worth over $50. So you can find deals like that. I also recently picked up a bunch of vintage alarm clock radios, and I paid $7 for two, and they sell for $30 each. So it's crazy, some of the stuff that you can find, but whenever I go in, it's not stuff that I necessarily knew, but it's stuff that I had an eye for, and it just caught my eye. I look it up on eBay sold comps or other sites, and I realize that I can make money on it, and that's what makes me pull the trigger to buy them. But whenever you're starting out, start out small, look at what you know, and then gain your experience and always look up to see what things are selling for. Now whenever you're starting out, when it comes to selling, you have to decide whether or not you're gonna be selling in-person or online. In my opinion, starting out in-person is a lot easier. The first thing I will say is I never give my home address. I always meet locally, and I always say I'm gonna meet at various locations. Rather than meeting at home, and them now knowing my address, I just don't feel comfortable with that, but you have to decide whether or not you're selling online or in-person. Again, in-person is easier at first until you gain the knowledge of selling online. Now selling online, I don't necessarily mean eBay right off the starts. I mean, shipping your item to somebody and them doing an e-transfer so you get the money. That's something that takes a little bit of time for you to be comfortable and understand the dynamics of selling like that. And of course, then eventually getting all the way to eBay and selling on eBay and learning eBay and everything like that does take some time as well. So I honestly would recommend selling in-person to starts and doing local meetups and selling on Facebook, Marketplace, Kijiji and other sites. And the key to running a successful business is always growing your knowledge and learning more and more. Whenever I started out, I knew that I liked video games, I knew that I liked comics, but I just didn't know what values of certain things were, what I should be paying for items or big lots, what I should be selling certain things for, certain things to keep an eye out on. Now whenever I'm on Facebook, Marketplace, for example or Kijiji and I'm looking for inventory, if I see a lot of video games, I can basically just look and pick out a few that are valuable and then I can try to decide if I want to make an offer. If it's all cheap $1 games, then the bundle just might not be worth purchasing. But if I can pick out a couple $20 or $30 games or ones that are worth more, I can sell those individually on eBay, sell the lots with the console locally and make my money that way. So now I have kind of an eye for it. I can look and know what I should be buying and what certain things are worth. And again, I always research, even though I've been doing this for three years, going on four years now, there's still times where I'm going to research and look up sold comps on eBay to see if something is worth buying it, if I can sell it for what I think I can sell it for, and I'm always learning. So that is the key whenever you're doing a reselling business is to always keep learning, keep self-teaching yourself, learn new things, and even if that means going outside of your elements, making sure you have the research before trying new items and trying to purchase outside of your niche, try to do that and basically get your research and your knowledge on point. Hope you guys enjoyed this video, me talking about how to start a reselling business. Again, it doesn't take much. You don't need a lot of employees. You don't need to sell online at first. You don't need eBay at first. You can use eBay as a learning tool to see what things are worth, but honestly, doing local meetups, looking for inventory at your sales and that is a great start. Hope you guys enjoyed this video. I'll see you guys in the next one. Please take care. Peace.


Yeah!  Le Cure. Le Cure. That's where it's at. Let's go man, sponsors, shout outs. Battle on my right, introduce yourself homie. Yeah, it's Lou Safer, waste attack. Yeah! We all know the man on the left, introduce yourself bro. Purpose. What's up Melbourne, we good? Yeah!  It's one round battle, so hold it down everyone, yeah? Lou Safer son of a mornin'. This could be like the book of Isaiah. The ego get knocked straight at him when you drop out of nowhere like a Beyonce album. With me every bars are best of, the question marks get left off. Wanna act? I can help him start, my whole repertoire is headshots. An electric charge just sets off, blows a pen apart and shells drop. He sets apart the best with bars from Kevin Hart with dreadlocks. Yo, I'll hold up a mirror for him and he'll know that it's the real deal. When Lou see Lou with the top of that head missing like Kill Bill. Trust me, this isn't big. I've been killing Safer since a kid. If he the king of pops I'm the proper fault in his drip bro, this is it. I'll put you in front of the people out here. You can have that promo. Spit your best quotes and get Ghost like the Snapchat logo. Cause he can say he's not stressing like he'll have no trouble out rapping me. But when he folds we'll see a different picture like Mad Magazine. What you got like 12 battles? Well that's perfect. In the 12th verse Lucifer fell. He got sent down under for punishment. So to you this is hell, I'm just trying to get the demons out me. I'm surprised you couldn't tell. It's the soundtrack to an exorcism like tubular bells. So when I set timers it's like I hit him off for the bag of that dank with the red fibers. The bomber lift his head higher. I have him hold a gallon of gas and a cigarette lighter.  I'm the one.  Little man with the braids. Looking like Stevie Wonder's son. Your battle with Madflex.  Your battle with Troy Brown.  Your battle with Raptor.  I'm playing.  You want to know who's the best out in Florida? A correctional officer? Far as you even people who don't gamble put a bet in our body here because I snap in this field like a wedding photographer. You want to know who's the second biggest rapper from FL in the business? Stitches. And I'm not saying you're the same. Just similar. You've both got knocked out for you made it to the game. Keep it real with us. You got out barred in Atlanta.  Fell apart it was banner. First round he started and stammered.  Rapper. Dramatic pause like an actor. But never take time to practice. 100 punchlines. Zero talent. How else can I get this across? If the people who say you won start the sentence with no one says then you lost. Me I don't show no mercy. The flow is so noteworthy. I'm gonna do bro ham dirty. Owen's going 0 for 30.   What's an entertainer that's not entertaining to watch? You're trying to get on TV but things ain't all what they seem because GTA is the only time we see wasted on the screen. If you have a CEO right? The CEO. It all makes perfect sense suddenly. You call yourself CEO and then just pray you turn into somebody. Trying to make your little group sound like a movement.   You're not the CEO just because no one else works for the company. He went to a seminar exclusively for CEOs to represent his team. Let me set the scene. He walks over in his company shirt that makes it look like he can barely spell or read and starts talking to a couple of entrepreneurs on the mezzanine. They were like so what field your company in? He was like connecting schemes. One guy was like I'm not sure I get what our new friend here means. What like environmental schemes, investment schemes, incentive schemes for parental leave. Eventually he could see Lou getting upset and said forget for me. What's your Twitter name? We'll just go online to check and see. Swagger boss? Let me see. Huh. Was that Swagger with an E? Oh Swagger. And they laughed so hard they could barely breathe like nice one on. We all had dreams when we were 17. Shit. I swear I hope for this dude's sake he just acts slow. So Hollywood. You're almost a bloomed late in Orlando. Me I'm all smiles but it's doomsday in my wraps though. So I make Lou pay for this huge crazy fiasco.   Cause you can't spell. No, no, no, you just can't spell at all. Tell the US I'm king. It's like a cab call. Cause when I hail you see the flag fall. Yo, I've been the one for 10 plus. This is nothing new Lou. So when you watch this back on YouTube, you realize the driest parts of my verse, or I do the style that you do. So when they said he was on a run, I said that's funny to me. Cause everybody has a run. Delay running to me. Number 83. First thing I thought when I found out it would be me in purpose battling. Isn't it 2016? Why is purpose battling? No purpose battling. No purpose. That wasn't even a bar. I know purpose. That's cause it's opposite day.  But I still did it on purpose. The chrome working. You dig me?  A thousand leads below the sea level you won't service. Have everybody in don't flop looking for them. Phone earn. Call tone. Call tone. Side note.  And I ain't even got no service.  Not even if soul searching. My style. Yeah it was crazy. Let's go! Let's go! And they still won't find purpose. Not even if soul searching. My style flourish. The kids missing. No need for the child service. At your funeral.   Cause she all depressed from walking around. Without purpose. Name please. I know y'all hate this.   This joint ain't worth the paper. I'm only doing this battle cause I owe her a favor. I ain't got no love for you.  You look like the Aryan brotherhood is where you learn behavior. Jesus Christ. You weren't the savior.  Cause you look suspect. Perpetrator. One round battle. All name flips.  But for me. Y'all gonna have to make exceptions.  This ain't a question. And I don't think purpose fully equipped for me to come at purpose fully. Cause I could drop bars on accident and still rip purpose fully. Purpose fully. So don't try to come between the fam. Cause I brung the Nina. That's gonna leave you underneath the sand. My music hot.  The only people that like Purpose album. Justin Bieber fans. Yo his last album was called Purpose. That's crazy. Yeah that's just crazy. So please.  Cause you running up to death. I'm too sharp for these niggas sleeping. I'm a cut above the rest. Are you supposed to be a threat? Yo motherfucking check. When I look at you. I ain't seeing nothing but the rent nigga. I'm trying to eat. And you're still in a way.  I diss the most important meal of the day. Cause diss the most important meal of the day. And if I want to do it. Baby J gets sent to murder. Even if he misses when the technist burrs. If he misses. You sitting in the ICU. For all intensive purposes. I remember back in 07. I used to think you was one of the artis. When it came to the 16s. But now it's 2016 nigga. That was a long reach. It was impressive back then. To come up with them hard schemes. And your verses in your line.   If we ain't seeing purpose in this pond. It's a WRC.   I remember watching you in prime losing battles. And thinking damn. These two could rhyme. If only they didn't prove the swagger. But you didn't.  With the hugest fact that it's like. Lunar C writing bars up with his rhyming partner. Cause you used to matter.  Think there's someone I could take a loss to. Put your Rolex on the line. You better watch. Check your clocks. This ain't 2007. When you was hella hot. And since then. Your career been on this downward spiral motion. A steady drop. And now. If you look where perpetual. See that this motion will never stop. Perpetual motions. They never stop. But you understand it. Alright cool. My nigga. My nigga. My nigga.  Put your body on ice. Once I bust a ratchet. And leave perpendicular cooler. Like I said perpendicular. With a funny accent. Alright. That was a reach. I literally ran out of naively. I was an inspired.  But I'm past that. Once it came to the cash tax. I lost passion for battling. But that's a wrap. So now. For me to step in this ring. Gotta be money involved. That's whack. But you still need. Seven digits. Before you send me the paper. That's facts. I'm wasting talent. But I ain't never in a sober mood. But I'm still winning though. It's cool. I take my winnings home. And split it yo. I did it for the crew. And now you finna go and do. One round with the nigga known as Luke.  Last time I seen battle rap comp. It was Minnesota Luke. I run with the baddest.  Give me about a month and a half. We'll be running a planet. I'm on a roll.  I ain't one to be average. My wishes ain't get granted for nothing. So I don't take nothing for granted. And every time I step inside the booth. It's steady fire. The weapon rise. Bring in any guy you get inside your crew. See I got a right to bear arms. And it works out cause I exercise it too. But I would rather pay the extra five. To get my guys to shoot. And discounts for any guy in a wafer tee. Cause it's still 15 or popping 25 or two.  I spit two with a rip through your tissue. But I heard don't flop like jokes. So why does Snoop Dogg carry an umbrella? For drizzle my nizzle. These jokes.  I'm a serious threat. And I don't know a battle rapper or a fan. That took a one round battle serious yet. Chris give me my check. Let's know who won. Let's go. You're my passenger the same day as him. Maybe that Hennessy got the best of me. Fucked up. That Hennessy got the best of me. Punch drunk. That Hennessy got the best of me. Shit. Maybe I oughta let it be. I'm talking fucker Skype a limit. I'm high of a life and I'm in orbit.  Like I'm Dr. Manhattan. And I'm chopping plan matter. While in Rotterdam. Wrapping up a propaganda. Ashing in your shorty bandwagon. When I stop and ransack it. Booking shows in the Buckingham Palace. All my gigs are mega man.