rth could be geocentric in a much more dense environment where the lights are much more local and it could be much younger and now James Webb ironically is saying that redshift is wrong I tried to explain that I was trying to cram it in within two minutes so no I don't think that the images are entirely fake you can take a picture of this guy but they are of course layer with RGB filters red, green, blue and then they are enhanced via computer imagery and this is just well known so that's the problem the interpretation is the problem and then your presupposition of redshift is also a problem which is why Hubble was brought up because he's basically the father head of your position and he explains it's just a philosophy no we observe it, it's not a presupposition they readily admit that all the images yes we do there's a lot of artistic impressions taken from radio waves anyways they're not even seeing what they're saying background radiation I just got to point out that when he says we see it just so the audience knows we objectively don't, what we see is that there's even distribution with the earth at the center and they say oh well it would look like it was the center no matter where you were in the universe so we actually see the opposite of what they claim objectively that's actually not, just for the sake of the audience that's not at all what we observe there's a lot of plastic redshift but we can actually factor out the redshift as a result of the gravitational radiation because the light is traveling over such a long distance that's known oh my god what is it the something sacks, something sacks something like that I can't remember right off the top of my head but that's how well measured it is that we can separate the redshift as a result of gravitational lensing from the redshift as a result of the expansion observed for over 100 years it doesn't rely on interpretations we literally look out and see this you can deny it that's fine you're wrong, you can be wrong and you can be happy and you're wrong I'm not emotional I'm just showing that you're wrong, you don't know what you're talking about you don't understand anything about cosmology cosmology isn't a religion and you should probably not talk about things you have no understanding of gotcha and this one coming in from do appreciate your question nominal says Leo considering the majority of the universe is claimed to consist of dark matter slash energy what proof do we have of its existence and why is it important to gravitational theory because we measure dark matter through its gravitational effects in the rotations of galaxies galaxies rotate so quickly that if it was just baryonic matter which is sort of the matter that we can see holding them together that it couldn't hold them together they're rotating too quickly but they don't fling apart why and why is it also that they lens light more than they should and we can there's more mass there than there should be well there's obviously something they're contributing to the mass most cosmologists think there's some particle we can't observe that is that because it doesn't interact with the electromagnetic radiation there some think we have to make modifications to gravity but nobody in cosmology denies that the anomaly is there and with respect to dark energy that's just the fact that the universe expands exponentially quicker over larger scales than it does on shorter scales and some energy is going to have to contribute to that and that's what dark energy is so these are directly implicated by the observations we make the fact that we don't fully understand exactly what they are doesn't remove the fact that the anomalies are there and we know that they are there mathematical discrepancies because relativity is wrong they're not mathematical discrepancies alone but go off about things you don't understand if you had a question I did not see it in the live chat so just at me at modern day debate and I saw a super chat but not that question in particular this one coming in from where do the votes that disappear beyond the horizon go after they disappear they don't always disappear at the same location like a physical tangible earth curvature this is just objective see this is what's funny they say that we can see the curvature of the earth from the surface then we say look the horizon is 10 times too far they say oh you never see the actual curvature of the earth it's just the apparent location because of refraction you can never see it then they turn around and say again that's blocking that boat when we zoom in we can see the boat again it changes based on angular resolution limit perspective and then the conditions of the most of the air which is what you're looking through and then you eventually reach where you can no longer see any further so it's not even it's not even complicated I don't understand why it's so misunderstood I mean this is why my boy Eli superchatted to talk about the ISS and they just skated past it how they explained that the ISS would only see 3% of the earth from that height and you wouldn't see the curvature that's supposedly he said 5 to 8,000 miles they claim the ISS is 255 miles and they claim you cannot see the curvature and then Amy's showing us citations of 20,000 feet you see the curvature now you're claiming we can see it on the ground and the ironic part is they'll say left to right instead of straight on blah blah blah you can't see the curvature according to the math and you guys just go around saying that you can it's just kind of weird so can I just make a point about that I would want to know do you have any papers that are actually saying that there is no curvature again it's not saying no curvature Parla Larson the planetary director of the world's biggest planetarium you never see the curvature of the earth on the ISS at 255 miles shows the math because you only see 3% of the earth and you just claim that you can see it at 20,000 feet in a plane so see but don't you I asked for a paper and you're like this one scientist who Leo and I probably think you're quote mining like that's why we asked for papers because it removes human bias it removes just our feelings or opinions about it no no peer review with human bias baked in doesn't remove human bias peer review removes bias so I don't know so I can close a theory explaining that the etheric framework that would absorb quantum no because it's not rooted in any any debate me as I would destroy it yeah I know it's because you don't understand the subjects self-rejecting intellectuals look like a fool like you do now says a guy with veins popping out and I just put it in place this one is we'll give you a short and pithy one iron or thank you mate I've made a video about perspective and it's pretty straightforward is that everything beneath you converges upwards towards either everything above you converges downwards to our level and that's why we have a convergence points that we call the horizon and we can't see through the horizon because everything beneath us isn't see through so it's a pretty straightforward thing but anything that gets further away than that point of convergence of your eye level which is due to your viewing height it's just not going to be seen so it's not actually going below it or it's not disappearing anyway it's just been hidden by things nearer to you which visually appeared bigger thank you James this one coming in from who must move fast nominal says the invisible matter that we can't detect is called quote-unquote dark matter from NASA I don't know what NASA has to do with this this was this was observed like independent of them like that there are tell it like every telescope can measure this this isn't I'm just I don't understand why they rely so heavily on NASA as if like NASA is the only the only institution that talks about this like it's just it just demonstrates how little they actually understand of the subject objectively we don't know what dark matter is it's a mathematical discrepancy based on the relativistic but I no one knows what it is they say we know it's there electromagnetic spectrum of radiation so they can't prove it they don't know what it is you're right and we know it's there what's your point the discrepancy based on your presupposition begging the question of relativity in the heliocentric model no so they say it doesn't react well I didn't say that I never said that we did can you tell me why galaxies are held together despite orbiting at rates that should fling them apart yeah we have a much more dense medium yeah so what what is that what is that I don't know what you mean by superfluid I don't even think you know what a superfluid is can you tell me what a superfluid is you'll get there you don't know what a superfluid is you don't know what dark matter is and you just claim that you can see no I never said no I never said that all you can do is from and everything because all you do is the person said I don't understand when you hear my voice that's a great time I'm the one that's my role to bring order so if you hear my voice I don't understand why you wouldn't defer to me instead you want to keep talking over me so this will give you a chance to respond with it really short and heavy because we do it we've got to we spent a lot of time on this question so short and pithy and then we've got to go to the next one oh yeah by definition it doesn't react with the electromagnetic radiation or electromagnetic spectrum which means you could never see it saying you see it is nothing like that we see that the galaxy is allegedly new to space too fast if we assume relativity and the hallucinogenic model yes there's a mathematical discrepancy relativity has been debunked this one coming in from did iron horse really expose himself during this debate someone in live chat said this is coming in from brandy beckett says flat earth believers what evidence would convince you that we actually live on an upside down pyramid earth what that was for us yeah we're of the opinion that we try not to believe in ridiculous impossible things that's why we understand the earth is flat water to behave we understand that water must be contained by higher edges on all sides not just somewhere outside out of mind so whenever somebody presents a ridiculous proposition we just think okay yep next can I just comment that the reason that water is contained is because of gravity nice nice reification fallacy what is being reified the idea of gravity a conceptual abstraction that attributes physical properties to space and time that we can measure objectively and have for hundreds for over hundred years you cannot measure space and time bending and yes we can we have yes one what do you know what no just one question do you know what a little rents boost is I don't I know I didn't think so I didn't think so by the way I want to say this so they claim that they measured a gravitational wave displacement in LIGO this is one of the measurements they have for cargo and it's the idea it's the idea that they measured the displacement of a string one ten thousand one ten thousand the width of a proton yeah wow gravity proven you don't have proof for it it's a concept I don't know what you mean by string it doesn't use strings it uses lasers and yes we can measure we can measure the sensitivity in the displacement of those lasers on those scales that that's what like supercomputers do well how do you think we like observe the Higgs boson how do you think we've done the deep any elastic scattering to know what protons and neutrons are made of yeah you just know fuck all about physics you probably couldn't tell me what a tensor is relativity has been debunked on the quantum and cosmological scale this is just object you're literally just a parrot in a cage at this point and that is also not true the quantum mechanics and general relativity are facts the theory of everything which is a PR term is us trying to figure out how to tie both of these facts together you are wrong you'll get there that's what that's the opinion of physicists but I just read Pittsburgh University saying that they're incompatible so we can move on the sinister porpoise says has iron horse solved the P versus non-P problem does he mean the Q some sort of C window if P not Q sort of thing I don't know what's he talking about the P versus NP I'm sorry James W says after show on Amy Newman's channel defend your flat earth sky daddy as they say okay open mic James still getting a lot of feedback buddy see it bounce off your mic that's true and but yes all of our gas Austin and Leo and iron horse name your link to the description and after show on Amy's channel this one coming in from Samir says flat earth you have a model on formation of rock pizza uh no one claims a pizza that's called a straw man policy Elijah Freeman says Leo said we can see the globe from the international space station Paul Larson says that's mathematically impossible respond to previous super chat given the clarification Leo well nothing was clarified you just said well some guy disagrees okay I don't care show me the math then okay we'll be sure and message the math and you can see it because people on the international space station have said yeah you you can see it I don't think I said that you can see the globe if I did then you're just nitpicking at words obviously what I meant is that we can see curvature on on the earth from the international space station also I just wanted to clarify when I said the international space was like 8000 or 10,000 something odd miles I completely missed but I was trying to talk about the GPS satellites not the international spacing that's like what 245 250 miles above the and then I looked it up in the GPS satellites are 14,500 above well I just I just misspoke well naturally everything I just want to say I just want to say this so actually with the whole curvature from space you can do the math yourself okay and there's a video it's on my channel when I debunked the astronaut in OTS but there's a video where you can hear Don Pettit and astronaut on the ISS talking to another astronaut about how once they use the fisheye lens it drastically changes it and the other guy says wow I'm gonna have to start learning how to use this I love the fisheye lens literally they use it and they're talking about something that imposes curvature onto it it maintains a certain angle so if you're looking down you'd have a downward convexity imposed onto a flat earth it's not even slightly complicated to explain even if there were people up there and that distance is not accurate this one coming in from Brandy Beckett says how thick is our flat earth iron horse says thicker than a bowl bowl of oatmeal we'll give you a chance to respond yeah I don't believe that the earth has a thickness I believe it's potentially limitless but to the best of our knowledge as Witz had already mentioned earlier we can dig down to as deep as about 7.8 miles which isn't very far really it's not even they say the thickness of the crust is about 14 miles so to believe that earth even has a thickness I think it's basically in a relevant question all that we do know is that the earth we only need the top few inches of soil to grow our food and it floats above or sits upon some great depths which are really not necessary to know never gone deeper than 8 miles so why would we make a claim beyond that only the globe earth does that geology constantly changes yeah right it's called tectonic activity thank you for affirming you're changing you are such a clown the entire globe earth prediction the whole way down 7.8 miles was inaccurate with temperatures the amount of moisture the amount of density the actual elemental composition it was wrong the entire way down 7.8 miles you just don't know what you're talking about this one coming in from something that's calibrated to work sorry James sorry something that's calibrated to work in the medium of air and so as soon as you put it through a the ground or through a vacuum or whatever you believe it to be then that calibration of the thing they're using how many waves per second that's propagating is going to differ and it will give you completely a false reading this one coming in from I just want to know do you guys think there was a time when the government agencies didn't have control when people could just freely go to the dome and see it and come back and oh I'm sure you could do that sorry go ahead a huge amount of technology even building ships most ships weren't designed to go much more from one island to another or one continent to another to actually travel beyond Antarctica and once you hit that ice you need an ice breaker to even get to the ice wall which is even just Antarctica and then you've got nothing you've got no supplies, no food, no nothing so I really don't think that it really mattered to people of the past and really to us now I think the only way we can do it is with airships something that can float above it all and who knows we might even hit an actual wall and not be able to go any further so yeah I don't see that as particularly relevant to what people of the past are capable of doing can I ask do you want to move on James if it's really short and pithy I can give you a chance no it's fine because it was a question so you just go ahead and continue I'm sorry Samir says are there people living on the bottom side of the flat earth nice touch again no one makes claims like that it's so weird that you guys ask questions like that he just explained to you that I've seen it's like an irrelevant question and the deepest you can go is 7.8 miles that's the deepest ever dug so why ask us the question when the truth is you're the side making claims beyond what can be verified we're not doing that that's our whole point we want to empirically verify this they still think they're in outer space that's why they think that way this one coming in from do appreciate your question you guessed it brandy back at strikes again if we have no way to know how thick our your flat earth is then how do we know our earth is not actually an upside down pyramid shape well we don't have empirical evidence for that so we would have to be able to get to the area where you could measure some drastic steep drop off for anything like that to be viable and also physics alone doesn't allow that so we again it's based on what can be empirically demonstrated the earth is improbably and measurably a topographical plane when they ask the globe there's what we always do for direct physical measurement of curvature he then says oh well I think that's how hydrostatics would form around the earth and it become a ball because there are no direct physical measurements of earth curvature and they're only showing a topographical plane that's all we are addressing is what we know and what it does is falsify what they hold us the earth was that's the whole point thank you very much for this question coming in from coffee mom iron horse why is it day for you and night for us on a flat earth model well I did actually explain that a little bit earlier is I basically said that the sun is small and local and it acts basically as the hour hand of what we would think of as a 24 hour clock basically going around the equator getting higher and lower to give us the seasons and so wherever it's directly overhead which now it's actually 1pm here in Australian time 2 minutes away from so some in the middle of the day so therefore whoever is diagonally opposite if I pointed straight north and went the same distance through the north pole to the other side well that would be virtually there 1am in the morning that's exactly how it works is exactly how you'd expect it to work the earth is divided into 24 slices of pizza if you want to use that terminology and that's our time zones that makes absolutely common sense and in fact what doesn't work is if we were on the globe and we were going around the sun and we use a clock to measure ourselves spinning once every exactly 24 hours then every normally moved a degree around the sun which is nearly a day then our clocks would actually be out by about 4 minutes so that every 6 months we'd actually be having mid day at midnight according to the clock so the clock is flat earth proof because it exactly measures 24 hours every single day you gotta thank you very much for your question coming in from sky scion says I think Amy's obsession with religion shows that Amy is the one in a religion but she doesn't even know it lol I always appreciate when anyone uses the word religion in a negative manner so I just want to thank the questioner we should keep on doing that but no I've been actually doing trying to do the opposite I really I want to go as big 10 as possible yes especially the ones that are for scientific consensus when I which I think are actually the majority are on Leo and I side and so it would actually be easy and simple for me to just make this an atheist verse theist debate but no I think this is an epistemological debate this is about do you accept scientific consensus or is it about personal experience this one is a religion rap says Leo and Amy please explain why flat earth is foolish dirt I don't know if that's like a if they're calling you a dirt or I don't know obviously wrong and that's all I have to say the strongest reason very profound it's obviously wrong if it's obvious then you should be able to demonstrate how it's obvious I can I have well I just want to say you know it is easy to just say that someone is stupid or something like that and to dismiss I think that skeptics we deal with a lot of in our opinion superstitious and pseudoscientific beliefs but I think it is actually worth the time and energy to go through the research to figure out why they view the way they are we will consistently say you do not lose or gain intelligence by being a theist as an atheist or a theist so I would have to say you do not lose or gain IQ points by being a flat earth there I hope that Leo and I are just trying to appeal to good science for the empirical all you have to do is prove that it's wrong you know like if we can prove we have we prove the globe is wrong by there's no motion there's no curvature everything can be explained by perspective and diminution of things getting smaller distance at all exactly according to everything we expect to see on a stationary plane of Earth so if you are going to prove the stationary plane of Earth wrong you can't just say we have we've got thousands of proofs that's what you all say but you've got nothing you've never done it but I would worse to defend a belief that we have proven wrong I just want to say one final thing I don't think that either of our two interlocutors here Amy could like outline at least two of the points that we've made tonight so I don't think they're really in a position to say you haven't proven this okay whatever they're like five they're like the first points we heard when we first looked into flatter you're not even past the surface level misrepresentations and you guys often times you begging the question fallacies and then you assert your presupposition as if it actually proves what's in contention it's such a rudimentary fallacy that it just shows Dunning Kruger is clearly present but how are we using a begging the question fallacy in every scenario like with questions being asked for an example he said just everything I started to give it but both you guys interrupted because that's what you guys do you have to fundy mute the other because you don't answer questions you literally answering it but the floor is all yours sure yeah so the begging the question would be for example taking Aristothenes who presupposed a distant sun an infinitely distant sun with parallel rays and no refraction and then assume the Earth's sphere and then use spherical geometry or geodetic surveying that assumes the Earth's sphere use geospherical geometry this is begging the question fallacies this one from John we got this one Samir Farzain says gas in the dome why asteroids don't burn sooner can we see some asteroids please I don't I don't think that you at least comment well it's not an asteroid but it's common just hear Austin finish his sentence Leo for crying out loud yeah like actually all the meteors for example come from the same six radiant sources in a reoccurring cycle you don't ever see things come down from the sky and hit the Earth from magic outer space none of that's real they claim the reason the reoccurring is that things are dragging debris around in a cycle around us or maybe there's just a reoccurring electrical cycle to the sky and what's around us so yeah there's no evidence for these things and every time that they claim it's about to hit the Earth all the fire there's just chick kill bet can like maybe drink a beer and chill and laugh and then you guys are like oh we're all gonna die but you're not asteroids aren't real that's all part of the religion used to scare brain wash the masses go ahead Leo I don't I don't even remember the point I just want to point out that outer space is real we are orbiting our nearest star and the reason that we are able to breathe is because gravity holds an atmosphere here faceless reassert it again and again and again I'm explain facts Jesse L says Leo how far can we see on a globe model in what direction I mean that doesn't specify a lot I don't have much to work with here are you talking about outer space well what device are we using I have no idea I don't he's talking about over the earth I still what device are you using binocular like I'm not I don't have any specifications I can't it shouldn't matter there should be physical or curvature blocking you at a certain rate which is 1.225 times the square root but you still see off your telescope is gonna go off into like space and stuff like that so I don't understand how that solves the problem you'll get there this one from sky scion says Leo sounds like the kid in class that didn't study for the test when the teacher calls on them they make stuff up to try to sound prepared we see your cartoon poster Leo keep worshipping the 2D the 2D well space is four dimensional so I have I don't know what that means I also rather excelled when I was in school so I don't I don't know why people comment on like stuff like that it I also just want to jump off that we actually have nothing but cartoons and CGI to represent the 2D flat earth model now I know that is the lingo that they use however we have pictures we have videos we do not get the same in return we literally don't they're all CGI admittedly Himawari is stitched together and admittedly not real their website explains that they just take stipulations of data are stitched together data and put it on a flat on a globe earth assumed model of the blue blue marble you don't have real pictures we don't claim that anything is 3 2D we told you seven times in this debate that we've dug down eight miles and then you continue to straw man us with a 2D something which is ridiculous and goes to show that once again all you guys can do is beg the question and then use ad homes and then use straw man fallacies so I think the audience should understand for late fallacious arguments usually come from the side that is wrong well fallacious arguments doesn't mean that you're wrong it just means that the argument that you're using to the conclusion is is not correct it doesn't bear on the conclusion at all number one number two the distance drilled into the could the distance we've well that's not a straw man you're you literally just made the statement you're making fallacies and that implies that you're wrong except that it doesn't learn a fucking logic course so secondly digging down eight miles into the earth doesn't mean anything about its shape so I don't know why you keep bringing that up so yeah you're just not even on topic I explained we talked about the depth numerous times in the debate so stop straw manning us about something being what am I strong at it I'm explaining Amy just said that it was 2d we talked about the depth of the earth I'm not a three times so yeah but you responded secondly I didn't say that because you use to you not Amy I'm not saying that because you use fallacies you're automatically wrong you could be debating something that's the truth and just not be good at debating just be ignorant and you could use fallacies what I said was usually when the only thing that one side has is fallacious reasoning it typically is coming from the side that is wrong we think you're using fallacies you think but I just now continue we must move on I want to say folks one interesting thing is we did a poll earlier in terms of which side you thought was more persuasive consider this if you thought if you thought that your side that you were let's say here and seeing represented on behalf of you was more persuasive great reason to share the channel for real consider it if you share this video and you thought your side was much more persuasive well then you could say that your side one on a neutral debate platform and you can share that link with other people so that they can see it and that helps us as we're trying to expand this neutral platform where we give everybody a shot to make their case on a level playing field so if you haven't yet go ahead and share the video if you thought your side was more persuasive whether it be a discord group twitter group facebook you name it and this question coming in from says better sci-fi movie the matrix or terminator to what do you think the matrix or terminator to what was a better movie I've only seen the matrix and it's pretty good I actually think everything is backwards in the matrix and that the angels are the good guys and neos and Christ but I've never seen terminator so I'm not at the same matrix also I just want to piggyback off I do when I said two dimensional and I heard someone say it before me nonetheless my point was that you don't have anything but drawings or CGI and so that would be the actual point not focusing on the two dimensions because you can make a three dimensional flat earth drawing or CGI my point would be you don't have any actual photos or video of a flat earth so I didn't straw man you Amy not at all I didn't think so literally all pictures ever is of a flat earth and admittedly for the 15th time in this debate they don't even claim to have full real pictures of the earth being a globe in entirety in all of existence other than 1972 moon missions for like the tenth time so whatever bro all you have a CGI that's not answering my question I asked you why do you not have anything but cartoons and CGI and you're like all they give us is cartoons and I said all pictures are of a flat earth that's what I actually said but that's okay you'll get there you'll get there you can say I'll get there what you said was very silly but I still heart you I still heart you this one coming in from do appreciate your question thunder storms at the earth without water is shaped like an egg not a sphere what water just doesn't behave that way water fills its container and it will create a flat and level surface between any and all edges so it can't be egg shaped it can't be sphere shaped it can't be anything else other than the edges being higher than the water level and considering we know the known earth is at least 70% slightly more water then obviously the land masses which is above the sea level so therefore it just has to be flat it can't be anything else it's as simple as that that's the end of the discussion why does water find level fluid dynamics is the process that I always want to find is that because static water could do the same thing and to which you wouldn't apply fluid dynamics there's no dynamicity so that can't be an answer so why does water always why does water always find its level yeah why it has mass it has fluidity and therefore it will being heavier than air it will fall through air why is that being less dense than the ground it will rise above it and create a pool and create a sea whatever you want to call it it's always going to do that because that's just the natural observable law of physics but what is that law why does water fall through the air so it has a level of density and buoyancy I have a question can you give me the equation for buoyancy it has little g in it but the principle of Archimedes principle that's why you don't have buoyancy in space Archimedes principle it long predates the equation with little g in it and again I explain this because we don't use it little g is actually downward little g is actually downward acceleration that's what gravity is it's not actually the cause claim which is big g which is what's in contention no one disputes that things go up or down it's a mathematical construct and agreed upon downward acceleration the whole point of it is it's just a formula to try and describe what we actually observe it's not trying to say why it is what it is we observe it's just saying what is happening it's not saying why it does it resistance is the only force and resistance comes from the density of the medium that's in so because air has very little density it has very little resistance water has far more density so therefore it is far more resistant ground has far more density so it's even more resistant everything is a resistant force it's not an attraction force everything can be broken down to resistance not attraction and that explains relative density and buoyancy so why is earth's gravitational constant in the equation for buoyancy on earth and why is why is there no buoyancy in space why is there no buoyancy in space we don't make claims about fairy tales if you put a ping pong ball in a bag of water in space you can just literally look this up on youtube because astronauts on the ISS have done it the ping pong ball will actually sit in the water can you tell me why that is no one goes to space buddy well except that the astronauts on the International Space Station that are literally in a weightless environment you can literally see them floating now unless you want to say that oh that's just hollywood with their laser beam the water is there why is then you can do that we'll come back to Leo but let's hear from flat or iron go ahead for a minute yeah it's just basically saying that if you've got a glass of water in space well there's nothing to contain the water and water is made out of individual molecules so that's why it basically boils in a vacuum because it's returning back to its gaseous state so you can't even have a glass of water in space in the first place you wouldn't have it it would just dissipate into the gaseous components and basically what they've done is they've put a little sponge into a glass of water suspended that into it and say oh look weightlessness it's ridiculous it's a crazy argument well but except that the environment in the ISS is still 14 pounds per square inch because that's what humans are used to on the atmosphere so it is pressurized to number one number two there is still gravity in the ISS that's why it orbits the earth there just isn't enough to give rise to buoyancy because g is too small why is it that g is such an important factor why is it that if g is too small you don't have buoyancy I'll explain it if you don't interrupt right so little g isn't agreed upon average of downward acceleration everything's intrinsically electrostatic and actually we have an electric gradient that results in a downward bias so there is a slight downward bias not all fighters agree on this but it is pretty demonstrable in my opinion and everything's electric on the earth and so we factored this in so that we can actually mathematically quantify the effect of the buoyant force right so relative density seeking equilibrium or density to seek equilibrium in the process of seeking equilibrium so it's it's not really that big of a deal because it's in no way proven gravity it's just the effect of downward acceleration when agreed upon average for mathematical purposes that you're actually claiming big g is the cause of the effect and that's what's a contention and it's never been proven in a movie that's number one that's not the one that I'm claiming number two what factor in the equation for buoyancy gives is the it talks about electricity what variables are the electric ones in that equation again you're claiming that electric forces are affecting it then you need to give me with the with the dynamical variables for that electrical interaction are in the equation what are those okay so electrostatic just sets the up and down little g is nothing more than the quantification of the agreed upon average of the down so when things go down an answer to my question when we when something goes down we have an agreed upon average that's the effect of downward acceleration that's all little g is actually representing mathematically I'm explaining that what sets the up and down is actually the electric gradient we have on the earth which goes up 100 volts meter aqua potential increase and yes so things just go up and down it's not very complicated it's just a little agreed upon average effect and you know I didn't say that they mathematically call gravity into the equation it's just intrinsically what sets the up and down agreed upon average is the effects not the cause for like the fifth time answer my question what are the what what dynamical variables represent that electric interaction you just said well there's some variables that do that what are the variables give them a little the little g itself is a quantity that's gravity not electric that is not an electric force gravity what is it so what are the electric ones the little g itself is a quantification of the effect that comes from the electric gradient it's just the effect it isn't gravity itself downward acceleration is not what gravity is it's the effect of gravity which is big g we both have the same effect I'm telling you that the actual cause is electric because everything is you're claiming that space time bends and warps which literally is just insane reification fallacies I personally just no offense to you but I think it is actually just the resistance from the density of the medium that we don't even need to invoke any sort of electro sort of force whatsoever electrostatic or whatever that's just the resistance factor is simple enough just to explain why the thing will drop or why it won't so if there's no distance of the actual medium then that's basically all we need to say why I think drops or why it doesn't this one from Brandon Hansen says question for the globe Tards why does all the evidence and theories that justify the globe come after the assumption that the earth is a ball I would say it's the exact opposite saying that we have a presupposition is incorrect just saying like the sciences have a presupposition that the world is a globe is incorrect what has happened is a scientific consensus has been formed in that all physicists all people in the field believe that the world is round and we have multiple experiments for at this point hundreds of years I would say the first empirical was thousands but really it took natural philosophers to go into the process of science for us to really verify it this one from mj says awesome how many empirical evidences have been given I don't know what side they mean yeah I give a lot like every single time that we do anything in the world fly planes, helicopters, ballistic missiles any longer than shots anything like that that all assumes a flat stationary plane earth well every time it's effectively implemented the practical use case is physical evidence for that assumption of the earth being that way and then we physically measured it so all physical measurements show that the earth is flat so the amount of empirical evidence is all of it all replicated evidence shows that the earth stationary topographical plane what the globe reclaimed as well it does always look like it's stationary it does always look like it's the center it does always look like it's a plane but actually it's too big to tell it's curved and spinning and tilted and wobbling in a vacuum and it always looks like it's flat and stationary that's the actual position that's why we say we need actual evidence so the earth is the center of the universe just like Pluto is the center of the universe just like Jupiter is the center of the universe just like the sun is the center because that is how expansion in all directions works we have to be a central point wouldn't there no this one from Shakespeare monkey says I feel like I'm an ancient Athens being lectured to by this soggy Aussie soaking in his pickle barrel okay well thank you very much for that but it's like you look jealous right look charming in your hot tub Deej says sorry wits it but Iron Horse is easy they say he's carrying you right now so no not at all I think wits it's a bloody great job I just have a slightly different point of view when it comes to some sort of electrostatic attraction I don't think it's necessary I just think we have the bottom of the universe and that's what the earth is and we have everything else above us and I don't think we really even need to have a force apart from resistance to stop things from dropping any lower and that's what the earth is that's the resistant force that stops any lower this one from the crowd Eddie zero two nine says fladers I think they mean flat flat earths they said would you donate your brains to science when you go it would help humanity to find the flaw that leads to rejecting reality self-projecting because you haven't tested it out of yourself here's what the cartoons and believe them so Brandon Hanson says Leo why don't I have to take in the rotation of the earth when I shoot long range and why wouldn't the rotation affect the trajectory because it's not when he says shoot I'm assuming he means just like a shotgun or something or maybe like a bow and arrow like a compound bow or something because you're not going over here enough of a distance except snipers do actually have to account for those things when they're making long range shots so there are certain people who shoot that do have to account for that the average hunter doesn't the range isn't long enough that's what he's talking about shooting long range he's literally talking about why unless it's a sniper then he does have to account for it so if he says that he doesn't he's just lying well actually I know many snipers that don't but here's the middle ground here well not at all shots they claim that they factor it in mathematically but the wind almost always overtakes it so you never really have to account for it there's no barrel rotation itself so like you never really account for Coriolis it doesn't actually do anything and when you really shoot you're not accounting for that accounting for wind and spin barrel rotation of course you wouldn't account for Coriolis you're not nearly large enough scaled what about the airplane that comes much further than the shot bullet why does the airplane not have to account for Coriolis but this shot bullet over a period of three miles does but the airplane can just keep on flying in a straight line and have them worry about the earth movement or Felix Bunga going up to 128,000 feet dropping three hours later than being 71 miles to the east when it should be at least 3,000 miles to the west what happens if the earth ever move well airplanes actually do have to account for the Coriolis effect tell me how they do that I don't know how they do it I'm not a pilot but I know that they do I don't even know how they do it you can't tell us how they do it well a pilot would have to but it's going to depend on which direction the planes are moving one second too many people speaking at once go ahead, Iron Horse, what have you got we'll come back to you Leo he made a positive claim so therefore he has to have positive evidence in order to make such a claim he says pilots account for the Coriolis effect so a plane that flies at top speed of about 500 miles per hour it's spinning approximately 1,000 miles per hour towards the east how does the pilot account for that if you claim that he does well the Coriolis effect is an accounting for the opposite rotation of the earth you're already moving with the stationary earth before you take off so that's not an effect so I don't think you understand what the Coriolis effect is that has to do with the conservation of momentum as one moves laterally from the I think it's laterally from the equator as you're moving orthogonally from the equator either direction as a result of the conservation of momentum as a result of earth's rotation and your movement you will veer off of a straight path if planes are moving in the proper direction there are slight effects that they do have to and do account for yes they do not adjust for Coriolis they do not adjust for Coriolis I just want to clear this up they objectively don't also you can talk about the conservation of momentum well as you get higher and higher up off the earth spinning if the atmosphere was moving with it you would have to have additional energy higher and higher up it would violate the conservation of energy and momentum you do have it but there's no mechanism ever proposed for why you want me to give you one they also claim something called super rotation which they claim the top of the atmosphere is moving faster than the spin of the earth but they don't know why either which also violates the conservation of energy and momentum unless you have a mechanism in addition as you have the accelerative frame of the earth going underneath you you would have to bank to the left or bank to the east and speed up forward accelerating to catch up with it due to the conservation of angular momentum but they don't do that right they actually just maintain a constant speed relative to wind alone so yeah globe earth debunked exactly well that's not for somebody who claims other people like bloviate that you're doing a lot of bloviation I don't even remember what you said because it didn't even register do you want to refresh my mind on what your point was seems you're not even interested in a discussion you're not helping people understand I think that's one of the biggest things here if you shoot a sniper rifle and you claim that we have to the earth spins underneath it changing the path of the people when we shoot north to south if you ask somebody to explain it and then he's trying to explain it and you speak over him but he's not explaining it though that's the problem you can do that right after he gets done finishing but it's like when you constantly interrupt you do interrupt an awful lot I know because they don't answer an awful lot so here's the thing they probably think that you don't answer an awful lot except I can't explain objectively how I do they can't so here's the thing though Leo you have to have a perspective of their minds and their different interpretations of things I'm not saying that they're equally right but I'm saying like they probably think that you're not answering just as much each time but they're not interrupting but so we'll give it a chance Austin and then we'll go back to Leo the fundamental idea is that to claim this Coriolis with the bullet shooting north to south has to be adjusted for because of an inertial and accelerative frame of reference then it would also apply to the plane like Iron Horse brought up the problem is that planes in real life do not adjust for Coriolis the autopilot doesn't also when someone flies a plane manually they would have to know about that but they don't they maintain a constant speed they would have to bank and accelerate forward but they do not do that so claiming that most glovers then claim the atmosphere moves and lockstep with the earth which also isn't true it actually would lag behind due to fluid dynamics and so then we know that actually there would be an increase of energy proportionate to the increase of speed proportionate increase of altitude which means that you're violating the conservation of energy I don't want to go the super rotation at the top also would need additional energy to not violate the conservation of energy momentum you can't claim Coriolis and claim planes don't have to account for the spin of the earth at the same time great meridian, great circle flights debunk the globe if you don't account for the spin of the earth underneath you our Leo will give you the same amount of time you don't need extra energy you just need less friction so you don't even understand what conservation of momentum is I think you're confusing with the conservation of energy they're similar but they're not the same thing and there's less friction higher up in Earth's atmosphere because of the vacuum of space so I wouldn't surprise me if there are actually currents in the upper atmosphere that move at greater rates than currents in the lower atmosphere as a result of gravitational dragging people who actually understand these things they know about these effects they understand the equations that define them and then you have those that talk about things they have no understanding of I would also like to see any evidence that the atmosphere would lag behind with those sort of calculations because that is the definition of an atmosphere is the gases that are being pushed down from gravity wow the fact that we have winds that can go westerly that can go eastly the wind is actually acting independently to the atmosphere all the time the wind is the atmosphere what? yes, I don't even understand that what does that mean? the wind is the atmosphere moving no, they claim the wind moves independent of the lockstep because it moves in all directions it doesn't just move east wind speed going a particular direction are you asking if the wind speed is like do we take into account the rotation of the Earth before we account for wind speed when it moves further than obviously if you were trying to do reality we do we just assume that the Earth is stationary and then we can just observe the wind speed being exactly what it is which is what it is when this proves the atmosphere it sounds like you just said the water went with the ocean hold on, there's just one person at a time if you have an Austin I'm sorry it sounds like what you said is that the water doesn't go with the ocean and that is just non-coherent like the wind is the atmosphere so I don't know what you're talking about if the wind if you have a blender and you turn it on the middle mechanism that is rotating it's going to go a certain speed all the stuff outside the blender is going to lag behind the middle mechanism proportionate to the distance outside of it it's going to get further and further behind it it's fluid dynamic, it's a very simple concept so as you go higher and higher above it to go the same amount of distance or to go to a greater distance and the same amount of time requires you to go faster it's a very simple concept so that means that the higher you get above the Earth the bigger the circle is the bigger the orbit, the further distance traveled the atmosphere would have to be going faster and faster proportionate to altitude increase to keep up with the Earth that's just basic physics so then either it lags behind or it doesn't they claim it does but it's not very much that it's just like two miles per hour up to about the height of a commercial airliner so you don't have to really account for it because wind is a greater adjustment than that we have problems with it being intrinsically contradictory to Coriolis, you have to adjust for it there's a lot of conservation of energy and moments and both debunk this super rotation also does this one coming in from do appreciate it Brandon Hanson says Leo why don't I have to take in that one, Andrew Handelsman says I saw you and Team Skeptic at the theater the other day did you guys go to see Top Gun part two just thought it was odd seeing you together, cheers hang on the team no bro come on man Brandon Hanson says never had to factor it Leo I shoot 800 plus a lot yeah that's under the limit 800 plus meters I'm assuming, yeah you're not really need to then this one coming in from Deige thanks for your support of modern day debate want to say folks our guests are linked in the description we hope you enjoyed this debate it has been a lively one to say the least all of our guests Leo, Amy, Austin and Iron Horse fully in his hot tub, our link to the description which by the way thank you to our guests and thank you again Iron Horse for jumping in last minute I know that it's been a busy busy day and so we appreciate you jumping in for Davey and want to say though all of our guests are linked in the description including at the podcast folks so check them out you've heard their views you can check out their channels and with that thanks so much to our guests though it's been a true pleasure to have you appreciate it, thank you much bye thanks Amy and Austin I'll be back in just a moment folks with a post credit scene letting you know about upcoming debates so stick around and I'll be back in just a moment amazing my dear friends thrilled to have you here depending on where you are two seconds let me just move over I'm here, don't worry I'm still here want to say thanks so much let me say hello to you in the old live chat thank you for all of your support seriously it means more than you know here I am at the bottom left how's it going guys good to see you thanks for being with us I know it gets wild and it gets rowdy but I want to say we appreciate all of our guests seriously we appreciate you and we know that for our guests I would rather it be a wild passionate debate rather than if it was a quiet boring debate so we appreciate all of our guests we appreciate their gusto it was a great debate seriously it was tremendous amazing thanks so much seriously I enjoyed this it was a blast I hope you did too but let me before we continue I want to say hello to you in the old live chat crackerjack happy to have you here glowbusters thanks for coming by GA thanks for coming by and thanks to your super generous channel support we appreciate your support and yeah folks if you didn't know we do have channel membership support so we want to say hey highly encourage you check it out consider it as little as $1.99 you can use those epic emojis that you see in chat including calling people soyboy which is a favorite or using the amazing one so thank you guys we appreciate all of your support and thank you guys for being here in the old live chat a rowdy guy thanks for your kind words thanks so much for that we really hope you enjoy modern day debate as it is a virtual platform we strive to give everybody a fair shot to make their case on a level playing field that is our vision and this is just the beginning of our story my dear friends we are thrilled and excited and appreciate all of your support sharing the channel liking all those things really do help seriously thank you guys as we have hit 80,000 subscribers and we appreciate all of you each and every one of you thank you for subscribing as that helps as well thanks for becoming a channel member sapo man welcome to so much soy thanks for joining that channel membership level seriously your support means a ton and maybe you're like I'm not into the whole youtube I think youtube is kind of biased or whatever it is we have patreon that's another way to support the channel so I do want to mention if you haven't yet you can consider like hey let's say you join the patreon we have different levels that's something to consider it's as cheap as two bucks a month that's one way of joining at the first tier if you join it five bucks a month your name shows at the ticker at the bottom of the screen during the debates as we appreciate all of our supporters thank you so much and thanks for your super chat nominal says it gets quote unquote rowdy because religious zealots tend to get triggered when you challenge their religion well juicy I don't know which side you're referring to appreciate your super chat and TNA plastic good as you Jared a thanks for your your support of you of modern a debate seriously that really does mean a lot we appreciate that commercial sound and video says thumbed up thanks for that thumbs up we appreciate your liking this video as yeah it really does help the channel does grow when you might be thinking James how does it grow I don't understand like me hitting the like button I just don't understand that thanks for your support iron horse I see you there in the little live chat and thanks again for saving this debate to the two format by jumping in that means a lot and so I'll explain though because it like I said people might say I don't understand if I hit the like video does that really help you James I mean it just seems like it's something to you know just because you know it just kind of ends there no it doesn't really the YouTube algorithm from what I've read does factor this in in other words for example our YouTube videos our debates get recommended a pretty good amount we've got a pretty good ratio so that's a cool thing they get recommended more when you hit the like button so like I said if you want more people to see this debate yeah you can share it that helps for real like if you got a discord group or a globe earth group on Facebook or a flatter group on Facebook whatever it is you can share this debate and that that's a great thing because if you thought your side was more persuasive well then you're sharing material where your side was more persuasive on a neutral platform the other thing though is maybe you want other people to see it on YouTube for example if you hit like that means our video will be recommended to more people so for example when you're on YouTube like right now you can look just below the live chat and you'll see recommended videos so for me I have like Kit Boga closed on Sunday Kimble I have there's more Kit Boga rock collection modern a debate videos are more likely to show up in people's recommended videos if you hit like for real also though they're more likely to be ranked so if you search flatter debate this will probably be namely this video will probably be recommended in the top five at least for like the next like several hours on YouTube and that's cool because YouTube is basically like testing to see like hey how popular is this and usually it falls you know down the ranking but the more likes it gets the higher ranking that it'll get in terms of the placement when people search the phrase flatter debate so it really does actually make a difference so I'm trying to just give you the reasons behind why we ask you to hit like as it is a it's a real way of supporting the channel it doesn't cost you a dime sharing the debate as well like I said that helps a ton too like maybe you're like hey like I'm not I don't know about channel memberships yet and I don't know about Patreon yet I've never done either of those and I don't really feel like doing either of those well hey you know what you can help this channel buy let me fix this little this is driving me nuts I'm gonna fix this it's the last thing I do on screen do you see the little graphic there there we go that's better is you if you're like James I don't know about this I'm just not sure well I can tell you you can help this channel just by doing those things it really does make a difference I'm telling you we appreciate it and I've got to say good to see you there in the old live chat world of bliss thanks for coming by as well as random guy thanks for dropping in misses no 86 thanks for dropping in Scott Miller says hello thanks for coming by Scott and thanks KK Pink Factor we are glad you are here Sean Miller glad you're here Greg warrener happy to have you here and slang glad to have you in the live chat read just ter slow bear thanks for dropping in diamond s we're glad you are here as well as ozone mcweego thanks for coming by iron horse I see you there in the old live chat Amanda thanks for coming by really do appreciate your help in finding this new venue seriously we're gonna make this work one way or another if you got my email already whether we take use that venue or we might be able to talk our old venue into matching their price which would be a cool thing because that's a good bargaining chip if we say hey you know we got this other place and you know we could go there you know it'd be pretty good deal for us would you be willing to match it that's something that either way your help seriously means a ton Amanda so it is gonna help one way or another we appreciate it thank you for your time and your support and sorry that I was so late to get back to the environmental center so I appreciate your patience Joe the total good to see you and good to see you as well as rifa thanks for dropping in Felix glad to have you here Nick McIntyre thanks for dropping in glad to have you and see me Norfolk happy to have you here as well as ghost 24824 thanks for dropping in Amanda says the patreon is bomb meetings with James make it 100% worth it to go all in and that's right we do have meetings with me I'm actually like tomorrow we've got a meeting it is at 11am eastern time so if you are in the it's the front row seating tier for patreon that's another possibility is that I have these zoom meetings where just 10 bucks a month you know it's like basically the price of Chipotle once a month is basically there are meetings where I say hey what topics are really hot right now what would you really like to see that tomorrow for example is what we're going to be talking about a lot is finding out what topics we're going to probably have for our conference coming up in November which is going to be awesome master optics good to see you there in the old live chat as well as well as well as truth hour of comedy thanks for coming by as well as Greg Warner happy to have you here my dear friends thanks for all of your support helioskeptic good to have you Mr. Anderson good to see you there in the old chat is founded by Keith am I saying it right glad to have you diamond s thanks for coming by aha glad you're here I see you there aha grim theorists thanks for coming by and thanks for your super chat dingley bumbus says is COVID James saved is COVID James saved cheers Christ is the best wine maker thank you for your super chat dingley bumbus and is COVID James saved is are you asking am I okay from COVID I think I told you guys the other night on Wednesday I had COVID almost back to normal I do thanks for asking I appreciate it I am really close I haven't a stuffy nose still so I'm almost back to normal and I'm hoping to be back to normal tomorrow or Monday so that's encouraging but want to say yeah thanks for asking and looking out for me is yeah I've had as the third time I've had COVID is that crazy you guys and I just had it two months ago just two months ago and I had it I got it again but it wasn't nearly as powerful this time like this this time I got over it a lot better I've been able to handle a lot better I've been resting more but not needing to like sleep an entire day like back in July iron horse thanks for coming by thanks for the channel enjoy seeing it go from strength to strength again thank you iron horse for forgiving me and because as you know I had strong words in our email exchange and I appreciate you forgiving me it's true thanks for jumping in and you have did you hear my response about the young church shout out I did let's go to that so I saw you said Anna Kasperian said to Dennis Prager that MDD is a potential platform to debate leftist on it was awesome that is so cool to know I am so pumped because modern day debate hearing that now we're being you know that yeah some people are like even like that's something I had dreamed of I told you guys this like six months ago do you remember when I said someday you know these people are going to be on Twitter they're going to be these big time content creators like young Turks is like one of the biggest political commentary channels period like on YouTube and I said there's going to be you know big creators who are going to say someday like hey well if we're going to debate why not modern day debate I said you know it's going to happen folks believe me on Twitter we're going to be recommended and it's happening so the fact that Anna Kasperian it said hey like Dennis Prager like modern day debate would be a good place to debate leftist that's encouraging my dear friends it really is happening we've got something big going on here that means a ton I am encouraged by that I really believed it and it's happening even sooner than I expected so that's encouraging that Anna Kasperian said that and we are excited about the future you guys got some big stuff I told you I've got some juicy news I've got to tell you we are working I can't tell you yet because it's not confirmed but we're working on setting up a debate between I've got to tell you he's working we're working on setting up a debate between Destiny and a very very popular content creator on whether or not there's a satanic elite I will not say who the name is because we haven't confirmed it yet so I can't say that yet but I will tell you we're excited about that and then light of the twin lamps are you still in the old live chat let me know I'm going to tell you light of the twin lamps you sent to superchat the other day I want to answer it and then I can send this to you later and hopefully you see it said I would love to know your daily hygiene beauty and workout routines to achieve the giga chat physique that's funny I don't know if I have a giga chat physique but I appreciate your kind words my daily hygiene is I do use lotion once a day I should probably use it more than once because I live in Colorado super dry and then beauty and workout routines you know what I do no joke I'm dead serious about this I have read or I found online that it helps I use these micro needles like one of those like derma rollers I've tried to use that to help kind of keep my elasticity to have a little bit more what's the word I can't remember the word because I like when I was young I did not use a lot of sunblock and so now I use these little derma rollers they just kind of help keep a little bit more elasticity in your skin because I wish I would have used that's for real I wish I would have used I'm not making that up I'm very serious I wish I would use sunblock when I was younger because I usually told I look a bit older for my age and I'm not like worried about it like I'm only to be honest about it I'm not like afraid of saying it but yeah so I'm like hey you know okay like I want to try to keep that elasticity the there's like something in your skin you want to keep it I can't remember it but it's supposed to stimulate that but the other thing is I work out once every day and collagen that's the word sapple man thanks for and thanks for becoming a channel member sapple man seriously I appreciate that but yes collagen production is the right word it's I use these little derma rollers and it's you know they're like five bucks for a derma roller so it's not like it's and so yeah collagen but in terms of working out I work out once every day pretty much on average and yeah I'll say it's pretty accurate average and I work I lift I usually lift every day so a little bit not a ton but maybe 40 minutes or so on average and then yeah so but thanks for your kind words and asking baby squirrels thanks for coming by and then we appreciate you guys coming by thanks for all of your support I gotta go it's getting pretty late I want to say I love you guys thanks for all of your support seriously you guys make this channel fun it's honestly it means so much thanks for all of your support and yeah if you haven't already if you haven't checked out I am pumped about this modern day debate is on your favorite podcast app if you haven't checked it out you have to what are you waiting for I mean this is huge this is awesome so for example let me pull this up my favorite podcast app is podcast addict but I know most of you use either Apple or you use what is the word I'm looking for Spotify so if you use those that works too Google podcast we're on every single podcast so if you haven't yeah I mean you might as well try it and you can also maybe you're like well I've already tried the podcast you know and maybe you're even looking at it right now you can give us a rating if you rate us that helps us really for real give us a little feedback on there Damien Martinez has got those gains amen to that Damien thanks for your support buddy and but yeah so I'd encourage you if you have not yet check this out modern day debate is on every single podcast app and that way baby squirrels I love you too thanks for your kind words I appreciate that is that way let's say you're driving through town let's say you're like me you're driving through town and you all of a sudden have a bad spot or your service doesn't work very well because that happens to me a lot no joke it happens all the time and it makes me go insane however if I have a debate downloaded through the modern day debate podcast so for example like right here it's hard to see my phone but modern day debate you can see our logo there is you can download the debate and then you don't have to worry about if your service goes out as you're driving because you've got the debate downloaded how convenient have you tried that Mrs. No Mrs. No Mrs. No is this podcast which is cool it's a nice little you know trick we like that that's pretty cool and then let me see here I gotta move this I have this right there it is okay but yeah so pretty cool we're excited about that and yeah the podcast is growing it's 100% ad free we don't make a dime off of it we hope it's just a value for you as again the other thing is maybe you have limited data you don't want to pay for unlimited data well hey who can blame you you can download these debates on your podcast for free you don't need youtube premium or anything like that you just download them on the podcast and listen to them pretty convenient not bad huh so thanks for your support appreciate you guys I love you guys you guys make this fun and anything else am I forgetting anything thanks guys I love you guys if you haven't yet hit that subscribe button as we have many more juicy debates coming up in the future thanks for all of your support guys I look forward to seeing you in the next debate as we have a number of them lined up for the next week and we look forward to seeing you then love you guys and have a great rest of your night


Hey y'all, welcome to What Chelsea Eats. Thank you so much for joining me today. In this video I'm gonna talk to you about a tip to help you with either cystic breast or breast cyst. Like I've had breast cysts in the past and they are not fun. And I want to give you some information about what you can do to help. If you're new here, welcome. My name is Chelsea Knudsen. I help women shrink fibroids and heal wound issues using food, herbs, and God's word as medicine. Today I'm gonna talk about cyst in the breast. Cyst in the breast, just like fibroids, are an inflammatory condition and in my opinion, it is the body's way of saying help, help me, help. It's like yelling for help when you have cysts in your womb, in any area of your body. Whether it's under your arms, under your groin, behind your knee, whatever. If there's a cystic acne, your body's like, Help me, please help me. It is a warning sign that something worse can happen if you don't start taking care of yourself. This is a common problem with women and with the right protocols, you can help your body to dissolve the cyst. But first of all, I want to tell you I am not a doctor. So if you need medical assistance, you need to contact your health care provider. I am not a doctor. I am a certified holistic health coach and the information that I'm sharing with you is because of my own experience with this problem and in the experience of my clients. So I wanted to just make that clear before I move on with the information I'm about to give you. I believe cysts form because of what we eat, what we drink, what we put on our bodies, which is like the lotions, the potions, the things in the environment that bombard us on a daily basis. And I also believe it comes by what we think, like our emotional stress or stressors, that types of things. That's why cysts form. Our skin is in a limited organ. So sometimes you'll see cysts pop out on like under your arm, under your arms, under your breast, when your face stack type of thing and when you let them come to a head, you'll see something nasty come out.  But those types of cysts also can form inside of our breasts. They're filled with different types of liquids. Sometimes they could be hard like a fibroid is a hard cyst in the breast like fibrocystic breast. You can get all types of different cysts. Cancerous cysts, calcium cysts, like all kinds of different types of cysts can form. And I believe they form because of toxicity in the body and toxic thinking like I just discussed. A lot of you have been following me for a long time. So you know what I think about where fibroids come from, where cysts come from, all those things. So I'm not gonna go into a whole lot of detail with that right now. But I am gonna say cysts don't just go away if you just put a topical ointment on it or if you drink a tea or you, you know, just kind of try to put a band-aid on it. They don't go away like that. You have to change your whole lifestyle in order for cysts and fibroids and all kinds of things like that.  So besides changing your diet and changing your lifestyle, one of the things that really helps with dissolving cysts and tumors in the breasts and in the womb or any other place that you have them on your body is by doing castor oil packs. And this is the tip I want to share with you, but I want to give you some details. First off, all castor oil is not created equal. You want to buy an organic castor oil that is hexane free. And what that means is that the castor oil was not extracted from the castor plant using hexane. I like this one by Queen of Thrones. I love this one. It's such high quality and it yields wonderful results. I love this one. You can get it in this large set, um, this large bottle and I believe they still have these small bottles as well. This is something that you're interested in. But anyway, let me let me do some explaining. If you haven't already seen my castor oil video that I did a few months ago, then go down in the description box and click the link for that video and watch it in its entirety because I go into a lot more detail than I'm going to go into in this video as to why castor oil packs are fantastic for shrinking fibroids and insisting all that good stuff. So what you're going to do is put the castor oil pack on your breast and take in the key. I believe that helps these cysts shrink the fastest is by wearing the pack all night long. And for many years, I wouldn't do a castor oil pack because it was so dang messy. Like I couldn't stand. I couldn't stand the the texture of it. It's so thick and it's just it gets everywhere.  So I recommend using the queen of thrones castor oil pack that one of my friends introduced me to a couple. It's almost been about two years now. I can't remember. Maybe a year and a half something like that introduced me to and I was like, wow, why did why didn't I know about this a long time ago? And now they have the breast castor oil packs that you can wear at night. So what you would do is put the castor oil on the on the the breast pads. There are flannels for for your breasts. You put them on your breast. You put them especially where the cysts are located. So if you've got cystic breasts and you've got cysts all over your breast, you concentrate to just put it on your breast, right? If you have one lump somewhere where you're trying to concentrate, make sure you get it on that lump where that cyst is or tumor is and put it on there.   It's just a bra to keep the pads in place and you sleep and you put your pajamas on and you sleep in it at night. And if you happen to be able to use it during the day, that's great too. But the thing about this, the is the is the pack is what helps the cysts to dissolve because of how it's made. So you don't need heat. You can put heat on it if you want to, but you don't need heat and it's a whole lot less messy when you use the casserole packs. Now right here I have I have like a this is a small liver pack. If you don't want to buy the breast packs, you can use a liver pack and put it right over your bra, all over your bra, over your breast, put your bra on over top. Use this for your pack overnight. You don't have to buy the packs, the ones that are specific for your bra. You don't have to buy that. If you don't want to purchase this, the casserole pack from Queen of Thrones, I mean you don't have to to purchase them but it's just going to make it a whole lot more convenient and a whole lot less mess. That's what this is going to do and the way it's made, it's made of like a flannel material that is really soft and it holds the casserole in there. These packs last for about three solid months if you are using them every day and what I have found in when you're using these packs is that not only do you get the benefit of the shrinking of the tumors insist for some people because everybody doesn't have that result for whatever reason. It could be they're not using it right. They're you know, they're skeptical. Who knows or they're eating terribly because you can't just you can't just put this this pack on your breast and and think that it's going to change everything and not change your lifestyle. So I want to make that clear. This is not like some miracle thing.  So I just want to say that I want to be clear with that. This product from Queen of Thrones just makes things easier for you. It is not to say that you can't use a regular casserole pack and get some similar results. This to me is just the game changer that helps to make things a lot simpler whenever you're trying, you know, on this healing journey. That's my advice here. But let me just give you a little bit of information about my breasts and what they used to be like and some of you may have this experience. My breasts were such that they were on fire every day, especially before I would go to bed. I get pretty much tolerated during the day because I was busy doing things, working, you know, taking care of my children, that kind of stuff. I would be able to handle it. But when nighttime would come and when I started to relax or tried to relax, that's when the pain would be evident. And I would have pain underneath my breasts, all underneath my underarms. My nipples would hurt. It was so bad. I wish I knew about this at that time. I didn't know about casserole packs at the time for the breast at that time. I knew about casserole packs for the stomach, but I didn't understand the impact of what the casserole pack would do if I put it on my breast. This is during the time when I was eating ibuprofen like it was candy because I just couldn't sleep and I couldn't tolerate the pain. I would take like four, five, six. I probably took more than that of ibuprofen because I was first of all trying to sleep. I couldn't sleep. And then the other thing I was doing was trying to be out of pain. So it wasn't just my breasts hurting. It was my ovaries were hurting. Everything was hurting. My knees were hurting. My hips were hurting. Everything hurt. And I was in my 30s. Everything hurt and I was in my 30s. Everything shouldn't be hurting when you're in your 30s. So this is a tool. It's only a tool that you can use to put over your breasts to help move the inflammation out of your breasts so that you can shrink these these cysts. Like if you have cystic breasts and shrink tumors if you have tumors in your breasts. It's just a tool. It is not the answer to everything, but it can help you and it can be an answer to everything. If you're doing everything you can with your food and your drink and you know dealing with your emotions and everything and you just want something to give you a step ahead, then this this is something that could help you on that on that journey to wellness. If you want to pick one of these up, my link is down in the description box below. I have a 10% off code. It's the code is WCE10 and I'll give you a 10% off discount. But ultimately ladies, what I want to see you do is be well in your whole entire body. Now be worried about these inflammatory conditions. And just let me just say inflammatory conditions are not just fibroid, cysts, endometriosis, cysts, breasts, breast sims, breast lumps. It's high blood pressure, diabetes. It's high cholesterol. Like all these things are inflammatory conditions and all of them could be diverted or eliminated by you changing your lifestyle without having to take one pill. The heavy bleeding is an inflammatory condition. It can be averted by changing what you eat, what you drink, what you put on your body and what you think it could be eliminated. So I just wanted to share that with you. I hope this has been helpful to you. If you like this video, please share it with somebody you know could use it. Like it, put a comment below. I would love to hear your thoughts on this. And also tell me what else you want to hear about. Okay, lots of love to you ladies. Take care.