Yeah, you said it because I asked you about your game plan before the game and it was evident what it was to go direct and exploit the spaces that Clarendon College left when they went forward. You seem to run out of gas at the end, but speak to me about the performance. No, it was not about running out of gas. It was about not taking any chances. We won the ball, we made our chances, we got our chances, we didn't score. And when you don't score like that and you're pressing like that, sooner or later, you're going to break down. And for me, I think the boys played well, but I think Clarendon College today was the better team on the field. I'm going to give them their props and show them their respect. Will you serve as a platform for you to build on next season and we could see you back on this stage? Absolutely. We only have two players leaving next season, so we're going to have a lot coming in. So we're all right. We're all right. The program is strong and the movement is strong and if it's one thing they cannot say is that Mona is a non-traditional school. Congrats, Coach. Yeah, we're ready to go. All right? Come on, all the best. We'll never die. Thank you. Yeah, that's the Mona pride there led by Coach Butler. First time Olivier Shields appearance for them and they just came up short against this man's team coach Lenny Tji, coach back-to-back Olivier Shields. Speak to me about that field. I'm very happy about it. I think we're a pretty hard decision for this. The boys wanted it most and I told them before about seven of them is leaving this year. So they were here defending the Olivier Shields and you see what they did tonight. We didn't start out well in the first half but as the game went on we gradually picked up and started past the ball and the movement. They enjoyed tonight. That's what I told them. Let's go there and enjoy the game. Yeah, Christopher Hall was the man of the match for this game. Speak to me about you moving him from the left wing position to the striker. Yeah, they do that and on many occasions they rotate a lot up front. So sometimes I'm actually coming in and so we mix it up, you know. We don't want them to stay wide in the attacking third and they need to get into the box and that's what he did tonight, you know. Alright, congrats Coach. When's the party? Tomorrow. We're going down Clarendon tomorrow. Alright, all the best. Alright.


Thank you for that introduction Jim. I feel really small By the way, if you were all remote companies say if you want to swipe our handbook like Jim did Go ahead. It's creative comments. So it's totally cool So I'm gonna talk today about commercial open source business models And then specifically about how any age of hyper clouds we bet on buyer based open court A little bit about me My name is C. C. Bromley and if you can't pronounce that that's totally fine. I'm a co-founder and CEO at GitLab and GitLab is a commercial open source software company and What's unique about GitLab is that we're the first single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle So in a single application you can go from planning to do something Creating that in a web IDE running the test looking at the performance of your site Packaging that up securing all that with static and dynamic tests and dependency and container scanning Releasing that out through incremental rollouts Configuring that operating that Monitoring what the result is with metrics and logging and defending that against attacks now That approach has been amazingly successful We incorporated in 2014. We were five employees at the time We're now over 500 people In 50 countries all remote all working from the location. We prefer And GitLab is in use with millions of users with more than 100,000 organizations But I think the number I'm most proud of on this slide is that we have over 2000 people who contributed backcode to GitLab As we've grown as a commercial company We've been able to keep the community with us and every month there's more than a hundred Improvements in GitLab that come from the wider community There should be a lot of familiar logos on this slide one one of our customers. I'd like to highlight is Goldman Sachs They went from releasing From from a cycle time from a time to determining to do something and then getting it out there of weeks to minutes It was such an improvement for the organization that they decided to invest in our last round of their own balance sheet And I think that's the most genuine compliment you can get from a financial institution I think the biggest challenge that commercial open source software companies face today is how to deal with the hyper clouds And we're seeing that they are so-called service wrapping commercial open source projects So you have commercial open source companies like confluence who make Kafka And then the hyper clouds offer take the Kafka open source code and offer that as a service Competing with the SaaS services that these companies were betting on to generate revenue The reaction of the commercial open source software companies Was the so-called non-compete licenses These are licenses that say hey, this is open You can use this You can you don't always anything you can do all the things you were doing while we were still open source But you cannot compete with us We will not allow you to offer a software as a service that competes with our offerings Until recently it wasn't clear. Is this open source or not on friday mongo db decided to retract their license from review by the open source initiative And I think now the consensus is that this is no longer open source open source means You can take the code and you can start competing with us And this no longer allows that The reaction to these licenses has been mixed I think many people Like these companies and what they've built and they wish them well they wish them They wish for them to do well And you understand they need a business model On the other hand, we also love open source And we love the lack of locking that comes at open source the ability to pack up our stuff and go elsewhere And that's A freedom that these licenses don't offer Now i'm also a business owner And at some point git lab might embrace one of these Non-compete licenses. I'm not saying no to them. I understand why these companies did it But so far we haven't And that's what I wanted to talk about today But before that something that happened yesterday There was a counter reaction and I think it was a really smart one aws Has customers and those customers were using the open version open source version of elastic search and elastic search Had is an open core model. They have both proprietary code and open source code And what amazon did is they forked and commoditized that So they offered an alternative distribution and in that distribution They took many of the features that people pay elastic search money for like encryption And they made that open source They went directly after the value that people pay elastic search for I think this is a very interesting development and we're going to see how this plays out But it's clear that commercial open source companies are now vulnerable to this fork and commoditize By the hyper clouds How do you get resistant? How do you resist getting forked and commoditized? I don't have all the answers, but here's some things We believe currently at git lab We believe it's more easy to be commoditized If some use cases are completely proprietary and some use cases are completely open source We think it's More easy to be commoditized if you have fewer proprietary features because it's easier to Replicate those We think you're more likely to be commoditized if your users work through an api If users work through user interface, that is hard to copy An api is a much more limited set of interactions And you saw amazon do this with mongo db amazon now has a mongo db compatible offering That doesn't use any of mongo db's source code on the back end They made it on top of harvora also because mongo db's agpl Amazoners hasn't been to use that license But if the interface is just an api It's much easier to get displaced than when you will have a richer experience with your user Another thing is the price sensitivity of your buyer If your buyer cares about saving money, they're much more likely to flock to an open source alternative for your product for your paid product And lastly If your users frequently contribute to open source, they're much more likely to open source the features that you ask money for Later in the talk, I'll show how buyer based open core Is on the right side of this. It's less likely to be commoditized But before that I want to go back a bit to how we found our business model We Kind of did it like everything we do at GitLab. We stumbled along We call that iteration And it started with so-called ice cream money The ice cream money were the donations that people send Dimitri Dimitri was living in the ukraine And he got about seven dollars of donations every month and he and his wife went out from that money and bought ice cream together At the highest point when we did a big drive It shows that i'm not jim because jim can get 10 million dollars I got a thousand dollars So that wouldn't even that A big drive couldn't even get the money to sustain Dimitri and Dimitri was living in ukraine and getting his own water from a well every morning So like even that didn't sustain him Then we tried consultancy. So we helped people to set up and upgrade GitLab The problem was the easier we made that the more we added to our documentation the fewer people wanted our consultancy services So we put ourselves out of a job Then we paid development. We said hey, there's so many people wanting new features in GitLab We'll make them for you just pay us and people signed up and said okay. I want to pay this much And then other people came in said I want the same feature. We said oh, we have good news There's another company that wants the same you pay half And then both of them went dead because both of them were waiting for the other to pay Worse than that. They said hey We have a preferred purchasing agreement with another company. They do all of our software development We'd like to contribute to feature. We're like, okay Well, they normally develop in java, but they can do ruby and go too And we ended up spending more time Getting their code up to snuff than we would have spent making the feature ourselves and we didn't get paid for it So that didn't work Then we tried support, you know who you're going to call GitLab But after a year most people haven't picked up the phone only once so they didn't use it. They canceled their subscription We tried packaging But we were a bit reluctant Red Hat does a great job with packaging But we wanted GitLab to be used by everyone We wanted to first of all large companies to use it like they do now but the problem was If you make your golden version your great version if you make the proprietary and you give everyone else a version that's behind and insecure You're not going to get that adoption We thought about the data play we thought about gitlab.com I started gitlab.com thinking this is the new sales force. This is going to be great But everyone was running itself managed So that didn't work. We tried a so-called single tenant service Your own GitLab server without any other people on it hosted by us Turns out that's a lot harder than it sounds at least for us We didn't even go the appliance route where we sold hardware and we didn't want to end up in jail So we didn't didn't do an initial coin offering We settled on open core like like most open source companies. It's a great business model. It's 90 plus percent margins It's almost old profit Then we had a much harder decision What is going to be open source? What is going to be proprietary? And you want some predictability there you want people to Say hey, I can predict ahead of time. What are you going to charge for? We try to do it based on the sdlc stage So like everything in create would be open source and everything in monitor would be proprietary It really hurt our adoption across stages We try to based on company size The bigger your company is the more likely you'll want certain features And we'll charge for those Didn't really work there weren't features that big companies wanted that small ones didn't Want so some small companies said why do I have to pay the big company price? I'm not a big company And the last thing we tried that didn't work was based on the maturity of the organization The more mature an organization. They want certain features that Companies just starting don't want the problem is our most expensive plans were for the very mature organizations But the customers more most willing to buy where people just starting with the digital transformation They needed the most help they were the most willing to pay so it didn't match with the willingness to pay And we settled on buyer based open core and I'll explain how that looks So we have four different editions of get lab our Open source edition our core edition is totally free and then we have three paid editions Ranging from four to ninety nine dollars per user per month Our most affordable edition is aimed at managers in the company Our most expensive edition is aimed at executives in the company So managers want things like automation and and stability and reliability The executives want want to have overview in their company. What's happening rope maps value streams security dashboards across the entire organization We also have kind of different ways of reaching people the free product the developer advocacy The starter product itself serve you sign up online The premium product in the middle. It's inside sales. You can talk with a salesperson, but in the end you sign up by the website The top one enterprise sales someone comes to buy your organization They bring along a solution architect And it takes a lot longer, but it's a much bigger ticket size so buyer based open core means Putting features and paid tiers and the type of persona that would buy determines where things go And the higher someone is in an organization The more you ask because the higher our people up the more budget they have And the three tiers it's pretty classic. You do good better best is your three variants of your product What's remarkable is that we have a big price difference between the tiers It's 5x which makes for a 25x price difference between the lowest and the highest paid offering And that helps us compete both at the bottom end of the market and at the high end of the market But you need a hybrid sales strategy to pull that off. You need different ways for people to purchase it purchase the product Now back to that initial slide Why does buyer based open core help? With being resistant to being forked and commoditized So You're less likely to be commoditized if you have more proprietary functionality And if you have that kind of interwoven in the application That's great because executives normally don't want something that nobody else wants They just want a better overview So almost everything has some kind of a dashboard or a company-wide overview that you can Get to executives You're less likely to be commoditized if you have more proprietary features well Executives turn out to have an unlimited supply of feature requests It is amazing what a complexity is of organizations at scale So there's always something new for us to add to the application You're less likely to be commoditized if you interact through the user interface, which is great Executives tend to use the web interface of GitLab and barely use the API You're less likely to be commoditized if someone is price insensitive Again, this fits really well. Executives tend to have budget authority They can afford to spend money on something that provides them value individual contributors frequently have to go to a big approval process before they can get something And lastly, are these people contributing to open source? You'd rather not have a paid feature Really demanded by people that contribute to open source here again. It works executives tend to not be active software developers So they're less likely to contribute it. So all of these things work out so that was What I wanted to tell we're a commercial open source software company We face a unique challenge from the surface wrapping by the hyper clouds We're right now betting on buyer based open core and we think it's more resistant to surface wrapping than the other Open core models. Thank you for your attention One thing I always admire about GitLab is like you also have like an incredible internal development velocity within your org Give us some secrets here. At least give me the secret. I think It's one of our values. We have two values that are very Different from other companies. That's iteration and transparency. Yeah, and that means we accept when things aren't Done the first time and it's very painful. I'll tell you an example. I just read a blog post about someone and he tested our features and he said Tracing in GitLab is not really good. It's just a link that goes to jager And he's right. That's the minimal thing we shipped and it feels very painful. Yeah, but guess what in the coming months We'll be piling on to that But that it's taking those small steps really rapidly That is the trick because every time you take a step you get feedback and you learn more about where you need to go There's less less coordination needed to take this the next step But you as an organization and as a person you have to be willing with we call it Oh, actually it's not treatments worked the CEO of github allowed me to say this He calls it living with a low level of shame. So that's one of our company values We iterate and we're very proud of our velocity. Yeah, it's so impressive. I tell you you literally can see GitLab at work because again, we we definitely troll your g-suite docs. We get ideas about to build culture It's so impressive.  Huge respect. Thank you so much. Thanks again. All right. Thank you. Thank you


I'm Kaylee Hartung. Welcome to the CSIS Schieffer School Dialogues. This monthly series at CSIS is held in partnership with Texas Christian University's Schieffer School of Journalism and is made possible by United Technologies Corporation. The dialogues are hosted by Bob Schieffer, chief Washington correspondent for CBS News and host of Face the Nation. Schieffer and CSIS bring together key experts and analysts, government officials and the journalists who are covering the top stories in the news. Columnist Tom Friedman and David Ignatius, former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft and Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell. Whether it's the latest on the situation in Afghanistan or the status of the efforts to reign in North Korea's nuclear program, Bob Schieffer and CSIS bring key players together for a discussion before a live audience. The Schieffer series has become an important source of information and understanding for people who need to know the story behind the headlines. Keep an eye on CSIS.org for more information on the next Schieffer series.


Hi everyone it's MJ and welcome to the introductory video on probability. Now probability is a fundamental cornerstone to the whole subject of statistics. Now this is the big picture of stats and what we see is that stats is all about you know we've got some data, we calculate our statistics which gives us information on parameters and distributions of this thing called the random variable which generated the data in the first place and we reason why we want that is that we can answer questions and optimize processes and this is in various fields from manufacturing, farming, banking, insurance, financial market, scientific research, there's a lot of goodness that can come from statistics. Now probability, probability is probably the most important piece of mathematics that we're going to be using in statistics and the reason for that is that probability, probability helps us drastically with this thing called the distribution. We're going to be seeing later on that distributions have something known as probability distribution functions and these things over here are used throughout the course and the only way we can really understand them is if we have a good solid grasp on what probability is. So what we're going to be doing in this course is we're going to be talking a lot about very mathematical concepts it's very abstract and it's going to be a whole weird new set of notation and you're going to be like whoa whoa what's going on. The whole idea is to keep in the back of your mind this image and know that without probability without what you're learning now you're not going to be able to do the rest of this subject which is so critical in all of these other fields that you know pay your salary and help you get a job later on in life. So with that as your introduction please let me know if you've got any questions about it but I'm looking forward to seeing you in the course. Thanks for watching, cheers.


Well, hi there, I'm Sandy Alnok, artist and paper crafter here on YouTube and today I'm gonna do some yappy happy mail This is for the hefty doodle blog hop.  Go hop along and leave comments because there's probably prizes, right? This is the stamp set called yappy happy mail that I'm gonna be using today It's got puppies in it, of course, and I've cut three four by four panels that I'm gonna use on a trifle card And I didn't line up the envelopes that are crisscrossing each of the panels, but I think it's gonna be okay anyway I decided I didn't want to stress out about doing The whole thing all over again after all this stamping. So what the heck? Some of the puppies were stamped first and then the images stamped behind them So they look like they're layered on top of each other Just with some really simple masking Now I wasn't happy with the coloring on this puppy and the colors that I ended up choosing But it does get fixed at the end.  She lives in britain Is going to be on the last panel. So i'm going to be sending card with the puppy dogs Across the whole thing and I thought it would make a fun birthday card to send to her Since it kind of shows the visual change from one place to another And I'm zooming through all these envelopes. I didn't write down all these colors because it's a gazillion different ones But I'm doing a rainbow of colors across the whole thing. So when it's all open It's a rainbow flight of of cards across the entire thing And when I did my original design for this, I did a pencil line across all Three panels so that I'd have the same horizon line for all of them and be able to figure out what I wanted to do This middle dog is flying through the air. So he's up high He's not down at the horizon. So it looks like he's up there trying to get some of the mail that's flying And if you have little crazy dogs like this, you probably know they would probably jump after Things flying through the air both of my dogs have decided in the last month or two as we've gotten nicer weather And we have things like a fly that gets in the house or whatever. They've both decided that chasing bugs Is the best thing in the world. So now I have not one dog. It used to be just giallo that did it But now vienna does as well So I have dogs who are always jumping at things Don't even jump up on the bed in order to try to get to the ceiling where a fly is It's a little bit crazy. So yeah That is my world of nuttiness having two pups in the house And I do call them pups, but They are getting older This summer giallo who's my younger one is going to be two In july. So yeah, they're not I guess they're still puppies.  I decided to make them all look the same So I'm using the same colors for each one of them That's why I didn't put the colors on the screen for you because it's the same ones that I use for the first dog But here's where I realized that I wasn't super happy with the color here And I wanted to do something different with it and I wanted to kind of pull all that together So I went with a yr2 4 Which is darker than the yr2 3 that I had started out with And look how quickly and nicely that just kind of pulls everything back together again After it didn't look really kind of like nicely together. They looked a little bit crazy before so Just keep coloring. That's what I always say after you Get to the point where you think I've ruined it. It's never going to be okay now Well, guess what one more stroke sometimes is just enough And here I'm trying not to do too much coloring over and over and over again Or else I'll lose the contrast that I had from my shadows But just putting that one coat of the darker color worked really great I went with a duller kind of brown here the e4 2 so that it'll be different than the doggy color And then I decided to do a red post box For this one and the yapi mail does not come on the box. It's a sentiment in the set, but I added it to the mailbox so Realized too late that I or later that that was supposed to be the slot for the mail I think goes in the top. I'm not sure what the thing on the front is. Maybe it's a sign Or something. I'm not really positive. I probably could have looked it up online to see what an actual British post box looks like but there you have it anyway, so I have a blue box on the front cover red box here on the inside panel and then the Mail goes from yellows and reds over to blues so they both of them kind of switch So that I don't have all the blues on the inside and all the reds in the outside, etc So I did actually think that through and plan it a little bit I did decide to put a sidewalk down here underneath them So it's going to be one consistent sidewalk across all of the whole card all three panels And then put some shadows underneath So I'm putting a shadow under the mailbox and under the dog and I thought wait a minute I could put shadows under all those little cards, which would be kind of fun And the shape of each one of those shadows is going to be a little strip basically So little little tiny slices that'll just give it that Feeling that all of that mail is floating through the air And in order to make a card that was going to be four and a quarter tall And then each panel is four and a quarter of black paper. I had to make two panels that are each Two of these so there's two pieces of card stock behind that center panel Where I glued those together so I could make it a trifold card All right. Thank you so very much for joining me for this video Make sure you hop on over to the blog hop. There's a link to my blog in the Doobly-doo down below and I will see you again next time. Have a wonderful wonderful day. Bye. Bye


The store gets 500 bucks, so they wouldn't have the store. And so there are things that you should learn from more experience so that you will beat the same mistakes. The worst thing you could do is to do well and think that you know everything and then blow up and then ask a question that could be easily avoidable. You've really invested in yourselves here today. So I'm really proud of everyone who came out. Thank you.


Hey guys, how are you today? We're here with another video for my creative year. I'm gonna zoom out. Whoops wrong way and The prompt for this month is journaling and the topic for this week is use your words. There's a lot of oh wait Let's focus shall we there's a lot of different ways to use your words and journaling Of course, there's a traditional of right just writing doing a written journal and doing a sort of a diary You can do something that I did here on YouTube a few years back called negativity smackdown to work out and work through negative emotions I do a series with my friend Cindy udder and a few other people Leslie McGrath included called Explorations of me which is another take on negativity smackdown and something Cindy did Where again you're working through your emotions and doing a lot of writing on your pages. You can just keep it simple This whole year. I've been doing journal the journal pages that Say something Sometimes kind of powerful with one image and one word and they don't really say too much My art I've discovered over the years is about words I rarely do a journal page that has no words on it. That's that's really rare for me I'm all about using words in your art So I found recently on this theme. I was at the hardware store and This was a flyer at orchard supply hardware at the check stand and it's for I don't know their you know Rewards point thing whatever but that little window that says are you in? That says a lot and like our prompt last week, which was emotion for me evokes a lot of emotion So I want to do something with this this week to give you guys all some idea of what you can do With your words and your art. It doesn't have to be complicated. There doesn't have to be any drawing involved So I'm going to gather my thoughts and gather some things and I'll be right back. I've got some glue I've got some bits. Let's see what we can do So this is going to be the focus of our page and unlike last week Um for the video last week for my crevier. I think I'm going to talk my way through this one And I'm going to first Cut the distracting part of this off And I'm going to cut out this window Really should have my reading glasses on for this, but I don't I like that so to me this This really speaks to me. So have you Or are you ever feeling? Like the rest of the world is involved or part of some kind of a group Or club You're just not a member of and somebody forgot to tell you about and you just have no idea what they're talking about most of the time Okay, I've been like that my whole life and I know there's a lot of you out there that can relate And I think that's what this says to me because I always feel like somebody's saying aren't you in And I'm just like, what are you talking about? I have no idea So I'm going to I've had this page and this is a deena wakley media journal and this is one of her canvas pages And I took a bunch of um That was I think a piece of drop paper I threw that away. I didn't want to throw that away That was a piece of drop paper that had a bunch of washi tape on it And I didn't know what to do with it. So I just stuck it to the page, but that's okay We're going to use it there in our background My current style of journaling is not about covering up the entire journal page And let's see. Yeah, I just want one of each color and this is just some scribbling An experiment that I was doing And I save all these little bits and pieces and if I don't use them in my art then I send them out in half email and stuff This is from one of our art experiments our art mixology experiments So but I don't want too many straight edges other than in the window So we're going to tear the edges here instead of fussy cutting. I think a fussy tearing So are you in yet? Are you part of that club that other people feel like? um Somebody forgot to tell them about or are you like me and standing at the window looking in I always feel like I'm standing at the window looking in Okay, so now I want to dry fit my pieces It helps if they all lie flat And I might do a little writing down here. So let's get these glued down. I think we're going to just use I grabbed the Elmer's but actually I think I want to just use fluid matte medium Generally my preferred kind of clog collage glue unless I'm gluing down something really thick And it'll work just fine on the paper I mean on the fabric Y'all knew what I meant, right? Now these crayon rubbings are done on deli paper. So They will become a little bit transparent when they're glued down not too much And this is just no paper So you can do your journaling with Pictures or words. It doesn't have to be just words that being said I love to use words in my art and if especially if you're the kind of person that doesn't do that I want you to try it and I want you to give it a shot this month I just find that nine times out of ten, especially when I'm working in my journals that my work tends to become Even if it doesn't start out that way about art I mean about the words Did you see what I did there? I wanted the torn edge on the window There is a cut edge up here that I forgot to tear But I'm going to put it up here and it'll disappear into the background of the page So it's less obvious Push things down with a card I've got my heat gun here. We can try and push things down The pamphlet might not want to stick. Let's see Let's see if we can get it to stick. There we go. Didn't want to work. So Words even if they're scribbly illegible words can add a lot to a journal page Whether you're working on a journal page like this one that simply conveys What you need it to to yourself and the viewer or You're doing pages more like these that I've been doing lately Not only on these pieces of paper, but also in my travelers notebook where you Create certain drawings and then journal around the drawings to create a whole page Words definitely are a useful part of your art and your journaling to create To convey certain emotions and feelings about the piece I encourage you to give it a try if you're not already There's a lot of different ways to do it from using your actual writing and where you can read it illegible writing words from a pamphlet or magazine Whatever it is break out your words start using them. I would love to see what you do If you would like to share it in a safe creative place You can join the facebook group my creative year the links in the description below Don't forget to like share and subscribe and above all besides using your work in your art your words in your art Right now. I want to see you go out and have a great day Do something nice for yourself because you deserve it and I'll see you later. Bye guys


to politics and land in Hawaii with Dennis Isaki on Think Tech Hawaii. Today we'll be speaking with Mauna Kea Trask, Native Hawaiian attorney on development and utilization of Hawaii's natural beauty and resources. He is a fourth generation Native Hawaiian with legal background as well as Native Hawaiian cultural concerns. He is a practicing attorney on Kauai in the areas of environmental law and mitigation, land use, zoning, and entitlements. The last time we spoke about Hawaiian issues and now we would like to tie in Hawaiian issues, concerns, and land development. Mauna Kea, please tell us about your interest in Native Hawaiian perspective concerning the legal and ethical obligations of the state, the counties, and the activist community in regards to beneficial development. Yeah, thank you, Dennis. Aloha, nice to see you again. Basically my concern and what I like to talk about today addresses what I call beneficial development, which is in line with Hawaii's constitutional public trust doctrine and Article 12, Section 7 of the Constitution regarding the protection and preservation of Native Hawaiian rights and traditional customary practices. Okay, so now we're going to blend it to all that with development, beneficial development, all that cultural preservation. So how do we tie that in? Yeah, so good question. When I'm talking about development here, it's really land use and it's a really broad definition. So if you look at state law and county law regarding what constitutes development, I mean it could be something as you know, redistricting of land, just something you do on paper, changing a map to and until building a structure, building infrastructure, you know, whatever that is. And really the point being is looking at and having a more nuanced view of what is beneficial development and more importantly what the real traditional and customary, you know, tenants of Hawaiian culture says about development and specifically, you know, moderately, I think that people think that Native Hawaiians and Native Hawaiian culture sees development as categorically bad. There cannot be any good development. And it's just not true.  And I think without appreciating and addressing these nuances, we, Native Hawaiians, you know, and Native Hawaiians and local people won't be able to continue to live in these islands. They won't continue to raise their families. They won't be here anymore. They'll be priced out and, you know, we'll just lose. We'll lose out. You know, the state and county has all these mandates for all the development. Now the government has to cross the T's and dot the I's or else they will get shot down. Like I think it was about 10 years ago now in Kulau, there was a 50 lot subdivision. They built out the roadways, created the lots. I think they got all the approvals. And then when it was found out that they didn't meet all the requirements, then it got subdivided as it sits there now. So is that something like the things that we got to buy everything together and get it done? Yeah, I think, you know, so that part of me, that Kulau development is really controversial right now. And I don't necessarily want to talk about that one today. But I think more broadly speaking that, you know, first off, looking at the public trust doctrine, right? Article 11, section one of the Hoy state constitution. And pardon me, I got my notes in front of me. So what it specifically says is for the benefit of present and future generations, the state and its political subdivisions shall conserve and protect Hoy's natural beauty and natural resources, including land, water, air, et cetera, and shall promote the development and utilization of these resources in a manner consistent with their conservation and in furtherance of the self-sufficiency of the state. So what I'm saying today is not, and I don't mean to convey that all development is good. What I'm trying to say is that not all development is bad. And with regard to, for lack of a better word, the activist community, I think that there needs to be, and this, I'm not speaking broadly, this is going to come across broadly. I'm not speaking about all activists. But what's the perception is that there needs to be more, I think, responsibility and more nuance and honesty, you know, to be to be clear or just to be blunt about the place of development in, you know, how Native Hawaiians characterize that. So for example, you look at, like really generally speaking, okay, water. Water is an extremely controversial issue. And it seems that there can be absolutely no beneficial and reasonable use of water if it involves diversion, right? It's extremely hard. And so difficult that, you know, on Kauai, the East Kauai water cooperative up there in Wailua, when after Niki, when the irrigation ditches blew out, they never got repaired. And so the entire irrigation system on Kauai, which is what our ag lands, you know, feed our ag lands and water our ag lands, it's going to, we're going to lose it. And I don't think that's a good thing. And nor do I think that there's precedent for that in the Native Hawaiian culture when you actually look at the facts. Because Hawaiians were, I mean, probably the best engineers in Polynesia. You know, no one diverted water like us.  There's all over the hillsides. And without that, we wouldn't, you know, Native Hawaiians would be able to live here. And so now it was done in the right way. And that's why I'm qualifying everything here as beneficial development. But for example, if KIUC wants to put hydro in a river in order to decrease our dependency on diesel, to meet our 100% renewable energy portfolio, it's not categorically bad to do so.  And my concern is that these commonly held misconceptions of the Native Hawaiian people and what they did is detrimental to our self-determination and ability to live and subsist in our own lands. And oftentimes it seems like the Hawaiian culture is used to support an anti-development, you know, anti-development program that doesn't benefit Native Hawaiians. And you know, another example, again, Kalaua, it's easier for somebody for recreational users to degrade that resource than it is for Native Hawaiians to maintain and preserve it. And I think that's wrong. Yeah. Yeah. As you mentioned, diversion, it's an interesting topic. There is a tunnel taking water from Honolulu River going to the Wailua side under the mountain. I walked through there. At one time, they were going to do a hydro by Wailua Falls using that water that got shot down, probably rightfully so. Now KAC is looking at hydro on West Kauai at Mana, but they're using it, recycling the water, pumping the same water back up and reusing it. So I think we're on the right track there. And they got some of the permits. Yeah, diversion is an interesting thing. So how does it affect some of the other projects? Are you familiar with something that the Water Department ruling came down from a Supreme Court? Similar situation. Yeah. Recently, that was the, I think it was the Malka Lihui, right? The 18-inch water expansion or something like that. So I'm not intimately familiar with the facts of that case. I am aware of the case though, and generally the proceeding. And that very well could be an example of that. So what I understand is the main person behind that push to shut that down. Well, first off, my understanding of that project is to support the expansion of Lihui to accommodate for more housing, more public infrastructure, help Wilcox Hospital, those kind of things. And it's a nuanced discussion. Yeah, all water in on Kauai comes from rivers and streams or wells and springs. But, okay. No, no, so they're a little bit concerned that, you know, it might be a concern about fixing pipeline, that taking water crossing district, our water lines and stuff. Right now it's all tight end, right? Yeah, exactly. And not only that, but I think a lot of the people who, my understanding is the prime mover behind that case doesn't even live in Lihui. You know, they're not, they don't reside in the Puna district, which traditionally and customarily that's not their Kuliana. And so it really matters what the people in those areas think and what they need. And you know, it's a nuanced discussion, no doubt. But, you know, a lot of the stuff that was my understanding and those issues in that case was, like you said, it's a real technical challenge. So it was a challenge to EIS, the age of it and whether or not appropriate disclosures were made and it was updated correctly. And a lot of these things are forefront of environmental and land use law. So a lot of these questions are, have never been asked before. There's no answers. But when you're looking at the dire situation that Kauai faces, you know, I think we need 9,000 housing units today in order to meet the need, much less what we need in the future. And so when we're facing something like that, I think it's disingenuous for somebody who is of retirement age and has their own home in another molku to challenge development and things that are necessary to house present and future generations, which is what the Constitution says for the benefit of present and future generations. And I think, you know, to stop a project when it's not so clear that it's a bad project, I think that there's a duty and responsibility for an honest critique and criticism and that if someone has a problem or an organization has a problem with the development, that's beneficial or can be seen as beneficial to work with and mitigate their concerns and not just simply stop it. So you win in court and get attorney's Okay, I don't know if we went into this the last time on the Kabakai analysis, which, you know, the rules say you get to go all the way back, which to the original grant, some guys say like, it's kind of on the property that has been developed, you know, a few times before now and you still got to go back. How do you see that working? Yeah, no, good question. So, you know, Kabakai is so basically Kabakai in 2001, that case created a framework that public, you know, the state and its political subdivisions could use to analyze whether or not there was, whether or not there were and to the extent that traditional customary practices occur on a piece of property. And that's, you know, in Konohiki land, all title to all Konohiki land was subject to the rights of native tenants, that's clear. And so, but when you look at that, it's a balancing test, right? It's not automatic, you get whatever you want. So, it has to be a true traditional customary practice, and that is something that was established up until November 25th, 1892, that's the cutoff point. It's not 1778, so it protects more, I think, traditional customary practices and simply pre-contact ones. And it provides, you know, you identify whether or not there are traditional customary practices, the extent to which those practices are practiced, and what can be done to preserve, protect, or mitigate any adverse effect to them. But when a property is fully developed, you no longer can exercise those practices. And, you know, the best case scenario, the best example is like anyone's house lot, right? Your house, your residential lot, my residential lot, any native wine's residential lot, no one else can come over there if it's developed infrastructure, a home, it's fenced, et cetera, and trespass and exercise their rights.  And I think the confusion is, in this case, it's, yeah, when you are, if a property is developed and you want to, you know, repair your home or build another structure, ohana unit or something like that, to have to go through another kapokite analysis, this doesn't make sense. It's already fully developed. And, but further, you know, there's a lot of misunderstanding about what that is. And I have personally seen instances where government agencies have required native Hawaiians on Kuliana lands, Kuliana house lots specifically, to conduct kapokite analysis over the effect their home would have on the traditional customary practices of others, which in certain circumstances didn't make any sense whatsoever, because frequently these people who are still lucky enough to have their Kuliana house lots are surrounded by non-Hawaiians.  There's no practices being taken place. And further, in the Mahele, Konohiki land was subject to the rights of native tents. House lots, Kuliana house lots worked.  So to require a native Hawaiian, right, to hire a non-Hawaiian archaeologist or cultural consultant, to ask other native Hawaiian, non-native Hawaiian neighbors, the effect that their Kuliana house will have on there, I mean, makes no sense. And it just takes housing more expensive and it doesn't protect the rights that it is supposed to, you know. Yeah, you know, I think when the plantations came in, the large landowners, you know, they had to live with all these rights, Hawaiian rights and all that. So some of them, a lot of them had cleared up to the land court application process, which cleared up all title, gave them, you know, so three title. How do you see that affecting things like this? Or there's no effect? No, I think, obviously there is. I mean, if something is registered land court, that's it. There's no, whatever rights are established, whatever the ownership is established, that's established. And you know, when I tell people, you know, my friends and other people native Hawaiian community, I mean, like land court was created specifically to clear all that stuff up, right? Because native Hawaiian law and land use law and property rights is extremely complex. But, you know, time back to what was said earlier, I think that's a lot has to do with a lack of outreach and honest presentation of what the appropriate channels are and what duties and powers we have as native Hawaiians to participate and protect our resources. Like for example, you know, I'm not, I don't consider myself pro development.  That's what it is.  And there's no supreme justice than the self determination of us, right? And so when I grew up and I heard like the fake state argument, right, I fully bought it. It's absolutely not true. There's no precedent for it. And a specific case ought to say that's not true. Hawaii state exists. The state of Hawaii is under the jurisdiction of the United States and the state of Hawaii. And Hawaiians are subject to their laws for better or worse. That's what it is. But before I learned that when I went to law school, I got the upside down flag tattooed on my chest. I'm not going to show it now. Did you go to Kamehameha school? 100%. But when I went to go to island school, too, I did. I did. Yeah.  You know, nowadays it's much further the other way.  And that's, that's a change. But I think that, you know, in order to go forward as a people, we need to understand what this really is. We can't fight windmills. You know, we've got to fight the real fights. We've got to margin our resources and hit those points that matter. Otherwise, we lose credibility and we create really bad case precedent, you know, against us. Yeah. Well, just a little bit more on land card, because it's another step in the bureaucracy. Some people are re-registering it now, you know, so they can do the development faster. But then you still got those cleared up rights, you know, up to that point. So they got it adjudicated before and then now they take it out, but then it's still clear. But then I think you got the, still got the gathering rights and stuff still apply, right? Oh, yeah.  And that's not a bad thing. It's not at all. But you know, an interesting thing about that, and I'm not going to name specifics, but you know, a lot of this old land court property, that's all old, you know, Kama'a, Ayanashirkeen family property, right? And a lot of them still hold it in a family trust or nonprofits.   And that's a huge concern, you know, if, if like, you know, on Kauai, there's a one-time ag subdivision, right? You only can subdivide ag land once after 1972. Well, there's a little bit of a side to that, if you didn't maximize it. True. But, but I mean, generally speaking, right? And even if you can, large tracts of ag land got to be, I mean, maintained. Right. So, so what that means is that no local person can afford to buy a 300-acre lag parcel. Absolutely not. There's no water for that ag parcel, so it can't be farmed. And then therefore, the only person that can pick it up when these families pass away or when they have to unload the property are people that, you know, a lot of people in the state don't like. And if we're not going to put Hawaiian land and local and Hawaiian hands, well, then it's going to get picked up by other people. And these are kind of the discussions that we need to have, that, you know, we need to take pragmatic steps in order to make it to the next generation.  So, you know, so is this still about Kamayana versus the Malihini?  Well, you know, the history of Hawaii is coming and going, right?  But in the more recent anthropological studies, we're looking at 700 to 1200 CE. So, I mean, that's, we're a recent, we're a modern, you know, young population culture. And people have been coming going forever. So, I think it's more, I mean, I'm native Hawaiian. I'm not saying that native Hawaiians have land that's owed to them. We have certain political rights that are separate from anybody else. And we were entitled to an indigenous government-to-government relationship with state and feds. But I mean, we all got, you know, non-native Hawaiian relatives, parents, friends, nothing wrong with a non-Hawaiian.  But again, what I'm trying to encourage here is a more nuanced discussion about these things, because I know a lot of non-Hawaiians that love this culture, they love this place and they're allies. I mean, if it wasn't for Isaac Davis and John Young, yeah, John Young command me I wouldn't have won. You know, I mean, that's a fact. Yeah, but then, okay, we got a lot of accidents or whatever to say, we're losing population here. I think they only print a net, but I think there's more guys going out and then some coming in. So I think there's more going out than, you know, what the net result printed in a paper. That's, okay, about, this is a talk about DHL now. So what do you think about any thoughts on developing with DHL and spending all that money you got? 100%. So there's DHL has land and more importantly, they got one third of all water. That's $600 million now. It's $600 million, exactly. There's absolutely no reason. I know Hawaiians that are living on the beach. You mean to tell me you can't put them on a hole? Yeah. You know what I mean? I mean, they're there. You got Hawaiians in Waianae living in the bushes. They can't find any land for them. You got land. So it's doable. There's no way. I mean, there are two steps ahead of the game at the Gideon. And more importantly, we can forget that Prince Coheal put aside those lands for native Hawaiians with at least one 32nd. That's 3% native Hawaiians. The fact that 50% is there now, that's horse trading in Congress. It's amazing that he did it because in 1920s he had no vote. He was a territorial rat. So that was it. But you got to put Hawaiians on that land, man. This is our land. We deserve to live there. And also, if you did that, you'd do a huge benefit to addressing the homeless's population because oftentimes we're the ones homeless. I hear a lot of reasons why we can't, but we need solutions why we can't. You know, that's what we need. We need leadership. Okay. Thanks, Mauna Kea. Running out of time, any last words? No. I think I appreciate the time and I think that there needs to be a space for these conversations and for native Hawaiians to be people and have opinions that are more nuanced than just anti-development or, you know, one-dimensional. We're multi-dimensional people. It's a multi-dimensional culture. And these are serious questions we need to address now because there's not a future for us if we don't. Yeah. And on the other side, the developers get to, you know, have some aloha for their land. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Total. Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Mahalo to our guests, Mauna Kea Tras and the native Hawaiian perspective on the balance between land use development and native Hawaiian concerns. Mahalo to our viewers on Tink Tak, Hawaii. If you like the Tink Tak free media shows, please help support this nonprofit platform. Thank you so much for watching Tink Tak, Hawaii. If you like what we do, please like us and click the subscribe button on YouTube and the follow button on Vimeo. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn and donate to us at TinkTekHawaii.com. Mahalo.


to me that it was going to be a short outing. I do know exactly how many pitches, how many knees, or anything like that. But yeah, they did explain to me that it was going to be a short outing. And therefore, I just point about it like a regular outing. So the preparation was the same and my team was the same. I believe you threw just 27 pitches tonight. When do you think you could be ready again in the series? Yeah, you know, I feel really good, you know, and healthy, which is very important. And I don't know, I mean, I try to see, but probably it's anything that could be ready for tomorrow or they're sick.


tomorrow gang don't forget we're doing a live stream from 1 p.m. 3 p.m. I think is that correct 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. check this out 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. and I'm gonna Share my sources of news and information gang, okay, I Think it's 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Let's check it out Schedule schedule. I'm just going to my gilded page here. I'll open up the gilded I'm just going to my gilded page. That's where I set up my schedule So you can go to schedule Tomorrow is 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Nice 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. I'm going to be sharing my sources of news and information an update of previous videos. We've done in the past, right? I think this will be the fourth update and there's a fair bit of Sources that I'm going to that are different than the ones I had previously because things have shifted, right? And if you want to know some of the information that we're coming across you definitely want to be on gilded server gang Okay, we have a light topics and heavy topics. Heavy topics is where I'm most active That's where I share a lot of information. There's a lot of information being shared on light topics as well So a lot of the Sources that I'm going to share tomorrow. I've been linking up in our gilded server Okay, so if you want uncensored discussion talk about whatever you want The gilded server is a good place to be Join us there


What did we watch? You know who we watched. What's strong we must deny me? Idiots on, Corbin? This is Rick. Come to me on the day of my daughter's wedding. And come to me on the day of my daughter's wedding.  Rick, hit it for me. Me? Yes! Yeah! Please follow us on Instagram! Come on! Jesus! Go, Dent! Where'd you go? I've been here for so long, and I've disappeared. Hey, look at that little button behind you. It didn't break, everybody. Well, it dented. There is a tiny little dent, and it's actually kind of perfect. Yes. And thank you to everybody who supports us on Patreon. Just to let everybody know what we are doing with all that, we have not touched any money that we've gotten from Patreon. It is all going to a trip to India. So when we have the funds to buy tickets, we're coming. That is the funds we will be using. Correct. So if you'd like to give, thank you so much. If not, no worries. Like, comment, and subscribe as always.  Yes. So, today, or yesterday, we watched Pastrami Mustanah. A, which I do know now is Bajirama Stadi. No, it's Pastrami Mustanah. It will always be Pastrami. In fact, it's devolved into, I think, when I told him I was watching and I sent up a text and said, yeah, I'm about to watch your mom's Pastrami. Oh, but this was obviously very, very requested. Um, especially after we watched Padma Bhat. Yeah, it was like, now you got to watch this. Yes. So this came out in 2015, starring Ranveer. And, uh, don't say it, his wife. Don't say that.  Deepika. Yes. Pat, say your last name. I can do it. Deepika Patakone. Patakone. But yeah, they were like, she's not just Ranveer's wife. She's a phenomenal actress. Give her the credit and hey. Sorry. Credit, credit. We knew her first as Ranveer's wife. Yes. But, um, so this one you want to read, though? Yeah. We'll read the, uh, the synopsis. On account of the romance between the Maratha General, Bajirama, the first, and Mustani, the princess of Budokan, my beautiful pasta. So, yes, um, this film, uh, obviously spoilers. Yeah, if you haven't seen this, go away. Watch it. It's how we like to do it. We'll let you know. Watch it. So thumbs up. Go watch it. If, if we didn't want you to watch it, we'd say don't waste your time. Yes, but I'm sure all of you have seen this film. Yeah. It's in 2015. Everyone but us. But, and every other American. The exact same director, if you want to say his name. Yes, uh, Sanjay Leela Bansali. I love this director. Me too. So much. So much. Because it was exactly the same, not the film, but the, the way Wusha, as Padma Vap, just completely and utterly beautiful. And astonishingly for me, even more. Yeah. And in many respects, this was even more beautiful. Um. And Alexis, Alexis was contemplating coming to do this review with us, cause she watched it with me. Because all I had to say was Ranveer was in it and she was like, I'm in. And the only reason she didn't come was because she says, I don't have much insight like you guys have. I'm just going to tell you that I really liked it and it was pretty. Yeah. We have good insight. Oh yeah. But yeah, the, uh, I thought the film started off really well because it started off fast. It sure did. Straight to a battle immediately. And then you got to meet both the characters. So obviously you met Ranveer, obviously when it opened and he shot the arrow. That's the thing. I was the first one to, which was a great scene. Great scene. But then you got them on the battle. Uh, she came in and you met her as a warrior, as a warrior. Yeah.  And then obviously that you showed their love interest and then there was that epic battle right at the beginning. I was instantly connected to the story, uh, as fast as any film we've seen from India. Yeah. I was instantly wanting to know more. Patanavat was a little more of a slow burn, which was fine. Yeah. No, which I loved. I did too. It was its own pace, but this really got me in it fast. Yeah. And, um, the, uh, obviously it was completely beautiful. Just like, just like Patanavat in a screensaver, but she, uh, the acting side of it, that's obviously what I drove to. So this is a completely different character for Ranveer. Yeah. And, uh, whatever the character's name was in Patanavat. Yeah. The raging madman, which I loved. I probably love that character more just because that's more of my type of character. I love that. Right. The raging lunatic. Yeah. Yeah. He's a villain and he's just crazy. Right. This is probably acting wise even better though. He got to show more range. Exactly my thought. Exactly my thought. So I still loved this. And I'm with you. I loved his work in this. My personal preference of watching a character are the ones that would be a bit, not as often as you. Like for example, I love Daniel Lewis and Phantom Thread and a lot of people aren't really thrilled with that. But that's my personal thing. I agree that the, uh, the nuances of his acting in this, I thought it was another level. Not that he wasn't fantastic in Patanavat. So I agree. But also on acting, I think Topeka outshined him. I agree. The ladies seem to almost always. Actually, both of them. His furged wife. And I don't know. I don't know if it's, I don't know what. Like for example, as great as Shah Rukh Khan was in, uh, what are the, the one we saw? My name is Khan. Thank you. I was more taken by, uh, uh, the... Kejul. Kejul. Same thing happened for me, which I didn't know Ranveer yet. But when we saw Gully Boy, I was so shocked at how good Gully Boy was. Yeah. Uh, I don't, I don't know why that is because most of the time, I think you may be the same way. I connect with the dude actors. Well, I think it has to do with one of the films we've watched. I mean, they've had a lot more women empowerment in their cinema. True. Way before we ever did. What? And not just in their cinema, but in their culture. Yeah, in their culture. Obviously, they've had women empowerment before our country exists. Yeah, that's true. So... But yeah, the, uh, the... I thought she did a fantastic job. And she was, she was so captivating when she was on screen. Even more, I mean, she was good in Padma Vah. She was. But this letter, Sean. Yeah, she had more to do with this one. Yeah. She had way more. The other character was really good. It was nuanced and she was beautiful and she was quiet. And she, I think she did a perfect role. I couldn't see anyone else playing that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. This had a lot more complexity to it. A lot more. She had a lot more dialogue, I think. That's true. Right? Yeah. And the other, I just keep going. So what else? Yeah, I thought the, uh, the... This film was so interesting in terms of... How you felt about the characters. Because you find, you find, obviously, when you find out they're in love, you're like, oh, and they're in love. And then you, he has a wife. Exactly. You're like, wait a minute. She took the sword. He's got a really wonderful one at home. Yes. Uh... But then you still ended up rooting for him into Pika's relationship. That's what I wanted to get into. Even though you're like, uh... So that you have a... Like, the first one, she's a fantastic woman. She's really... I thought one of the best scenes in the whole film was when she came into Pika's room. Yeah. And they started having that dialogue. Yep. And I thought that was an epic dialogue. And then it switched to the song. Come along, Corbin. And I was like, this song is so upbeat for being so depressing. Not only was that song upbeat, I was watching, this goes back to the directing. It also goes back to the charisma of the two ladies. Watch that, watch that again. And for those of you who are very familiar with the grand Hollywood musicals of the 1950s and 60s and 40s in Hollywood, I'm talking American and Paris singing in the rain and that ilk of musical. This director has got to be a... Not just somebody who knows it, but is a fan of it because so much of the way he shot that musical number was reminiscent of the golden era of Hollywood musicals at every level. It looked like an American and Paris a few times, which is saying a lot. That's one of the greatest movie musicals ever. And I just was flabbergasted watching those two totally captivating ladies in that gorgeous number in what is a really strange departure from where we've been with the two ladies in the conflict. But I think I loved it so much about it because I was conflicted. I was like, I love this song. It's so upbeat and happy, but what they're saying is each of us have this half of a heart of this man. We can never have his whole heart. It's like, oh, this is depressing. I know, but it was like this. And it made me think about the realities of, because they don't want to wax long on this, but the realities of their polygamy not only has always been in culture in the human race, but it still exists in some cultures. Like I remember when I was in Papua New Guinea, I sat down at a table with the guy who was staying at the little place we were staying at and having a conversation with one of the guys staying at this little hotel, a tiny little place, talking to each other and he had four wives. And it was just a matter-of-fact conversation about his four wives.  Crazy. Crazy. Now, how did I had very strong feelings about that situation? You said that you found yourself rooting for the forbidden love relationship. Did you find yourself rooting more for that relationship than you did Kashi? And Bajirao? I mean, or was it an equal tug of war for you? Um, it was probably equal. Okay. Because I mean, but I was also like, I don't want to root for you because it'd be one thing if like his first wife was like this awful person and he was unhappy, but like he seemed happy in both relationships. No, I gotta tell you, I, first of all, I think partly because I was so, um, it's the right word, captivated and enchanted by Priyanka's performance. I thought Priyanka is Jonas's wife, right? And I'm not getting into that one because I don't remember who was with who. Priyanka, because that's his wife. I think for sure Priyanka Chopra, I think is Nick Jonas's wife. It may be, but see Corbin's caring about the who's wife they are and I'm just talking about her acting skills, that's awesome. Anyway, Priyanka, and see he could edit that out so that may not even show up. I've just throughout all of this, it was Kashi for me. It was, I felt so sorry for her because she was just nothing but a gem, a sweetheart in love with him. That dance number, we reacted to that first dance number and she shows up. It was even better this time. Way better. I knew what was going on. I still was enamored by the shots. I was pointing it out to Alexis while we're watching and how in one particular shot she's standing there dancing, but he captured her in all of the singular reflection. Just gorgeous, right? But I'm watching this and I'm getting emotional as they're showing Kashi who's realizing the lyrics and the movement this girl's in love and what's going on and oh, putting two and two together. That's why his dagger is gone and over and over I just kept saying poor Kashi, poor Kashi. Yeah, yeah. And then when she had to greet them at the door, which was a great scene. She was like, just she's like, thank you for keeping my honor. And she was like, just so you know, the hospitality ends at the threshold. Yeah, right. Yeah, yeah. And then but then on the other hand, let's talk about Mustani. Let's talk about the moment they're going to try to kill her. For me. Oh yeah. This moment I'm about to I'm about to talk about for me. This is like if I was teaching a theater class again. This is something I would show in theater class as one of the most epic moments in cinema history in the depiction of a woman. When she's fighting those dudes with a kid in her arm, yeah, taking on three dudes and she's like, bring it. I'll kill all y'all with one hand and holding my kid in my arm. I thought that was yeah, that was freaking epic scene. And I also liked at the end when well towards the end to win, which we'll talk about the end here in a minute. But the Pico and she said carry the kid away.  And she gave him that speech. He was like, what is fear? And then yes, I was like, oh, this is good. Really good as as was getting back to Ranveer, his character. And I know a lot of liberties were taken with it comes. I tried to do as much homework as I can. And one of the things that with an American film that we have a huge advantage for. For example, when Spielberg did Lincoln, we already had a wealth of information about the background. And I could tell you whether or not he was doing justice to something. Or if it's subject matter, we're both really familiar with. We know if I'm watching a movie about baseball, I'm going to tell you if they're getting it right because we don't have that vantage point. I try to do some homework and I don't know how accurate this is historically and versus the novel. But one of the things I loved about his character was on the one hand, he was just major kicking everything away that was getting in his relationship with Mestani. But what I loved was his challenging of all of these religious conventions just for the sake of religious convention. Yeah, that was a really cool undercurrent. That wasn't the main story, but I thought was a really important part of the story. Not just how he relates to Mestani. Yeah, but just this revolution going on in the mother world. The mother reminded me of the mother from Game of Thrones. Oh, yes. She reminded me of the flowers who drinks the poison with Jamie. Oh, sorry, if you haven't watched Game of Thrones, stop watching. But yeah, she reminded me a lot of her. And great actress, that lady. I'm sure she's a legend. Yeah, I'm sure we've probably seen her. We've probably seen her a hundred times, but she was really very, very strong. Yeah, she was. But my favorite, I mean, for Ranveer, I liked the character the whole time, but then I ended up loving the character was the very end when he went crazy. Of course. I loved it. Because you loved it. You loved it when that was on the line. I loved it when he changed and then he just started running. And then he realized he was like, either like, I can't do this or whatever. He realized at the very end, I loved it. I'm getting the feels. There was a moment that got me to tears because I was so connected with all three of these people in the story because it's very Shakespearean. It is very Shakespearean in the tragedy of people trying to do their best, but not knowing how to handle the emotions and wanting to be honest with their emotions. But at the same time, realizing, should I always be honest with my emotions? Shouldn't my principles come before my emotions? So when he's laying there, and Kashi walks in. Oh, and he's two things. The first thing he says is he calls her Mestana. But she stays there and then he asks, how's Kashi? There I go, right there. That moment was just so precious to me. And her character, she's the heroine protagonist for me for the whole story. I just thought and that number, I couldn't, as wonderful as they both were, I just, Priyanka was such a surprise to me at how marvelous. Yeah, I think she was, which is crazy to say it with Ranveer in the thing. And Deepika was no less, we had seen her in Padmavat. So it wasn't as revelatory for me because I was expecting her to be great. I had not really watched Priyanka in anything before like this. Yeah, it was crazy that Deepika and Priyanka, they kind of stole the show of the film. Are there more films with them together? There might be, because if there are, I want to see those two working together because they're chemistry together. I want to see Deepika in something else. She's been in Baywatch. Our favorite movie of all time, Baywatch. But, hello, I'm Churnaseesh. Yeah, we're looking at Priyanka Zayn. I think I know she's done a lot of politics. She's done a lot of work here. She's one of the very few who have become successful in both American film market and she's obviously a superstar in India. Yeah, but yeah, I'd give... Did I see Barfi? Don too? Oh, she's all over the place, man.  We're infants. We are only three months old. We were exposed to Indian cinema for the first time of Gully Boy on January 14th. So, it's not even a three full months yet. So, we don't even know how to walk yet when it comes to Indian cinema. It's true. But yeah, I definitely get... I mean, this is, I think, one of the most well-rounded films we've seen. Absolutely. It's so gorgeous. I mean, I can't honestly find a flaw with this film. Well, let's talk about the sets and the costuming. Yeah, it was all beautiful. Off the frickin' charts. I loved it all. I'd give this film an A-plus. Absolutely. I honestly can't think of a flaw in this film. You might be able to, you might not... Like, some people say they don't like the over-dramaticness, over-dramatization of India history. Right. That's what they say with Padma Vat. Right. So, I don't know if it's the same thing, but as a film, we're just talking about that. As a film, we don't know the history behind it. It's a phenomenal film. Agreed. And I wasn't bored ever watching it. I never got dull. Yeah. All the acting was great. Great in... Which is the script. And again, when we say script, it's very difficult to know how much of the Lost in Translation thing happens a lot from the Hindi to the English. I thought the script was fantastic.  There wasn't stuff that were telling us that we were... It's like, don't tell me that. Just show me. I thought the dialogue was great. Just fantastic. I thought it was one of the most well-rounded films. Yeah. This is one I will recommend. Like, I am beginning to disciple people here who are good friends and are saying, okay, what should I watch? And I'm taking them on the journey that we've gone on. And this is absolutely... This is the first film that my wife watched. And she liked it. She liked it. She didn't like the subject matter. Well, of course not. Yeah. For me, it was just... She didn't cash it. She hates films that have to do with infidelity or not. It wasn't obviously infidelity in that time, but... In that culture, but it was... She was like, you have a wonderful wife. You have a wonderful wife, but you don't... Yeah. Why would you want anything more than that? So why are you not happy with what you have? She enjoyed the film. Yeah. But she just... That's not her subject matter. Yeah. For me, this movie is all about cashiness. Yeah. Definitely recommend. Thank you so much for recommending this to us. Yes. Thank you, guys. As always, you guys are always making great records. What film should we watch next? And...


From the Bulls to the Blue Ox, Bemidji taking on Marble, fourth inning, Ox down one to nothing, Caleb Carson hits it straight down to the dirt, Pitcher tries to field his position, airmails at high, Colin Rutledge scores from first to hide up. Six innings, same score, Ethan Riella smacks one into left, but Rutledge there with the diving snag. Blue Ox, turn it on late, they take this one four to two. If you enjoyed this segment of Lakeland News, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Lakeland PBS.


Everybody forced here ripping 2223 elite basketball hobby for box number 38 This is a random team stop right give me one sec I'll show you the results there's four to go in the next one of these by the way And again, we are running full sellout promo tonight everybody. There are the results on your screen right there Results page results link can be found at the bottom of the main page if you ever need to find results after the fact So good luck y'all here. We go and there's a link in chat for you if you need to see it There's a link in chat the next one is down to four. We had it at 13 nine spots came in literally during the intro video nine not a three to go Get it get it before it's gone guys for elite now We got court Kings teams on sale as well and again I was just saying before we before we started the break big teams up on court Kings mark down by like 20 30 40 bucks Well, good luck here. Let's pull some nice cards Johnny Davis rookie for the whiz to start us off. Oh Come on Shane Come on Shane orange Zubac six seven points a half is kind of a lot Star status LeBron James Lakers Do their B squad shooting out of 20 from three orange Jalen Brown Celtics Did he air hold a three? What are you gonna tell me best shooter of all time? Nuggets of the first hit it's gonna be a turn of the century out of Michael Porter, Jr. You're right. He's no salacious Dude, who's a better shooter Danny Danny green or salacious be crumb Did even Danny green would tell you it's like to be crumb blue Jimmy butler to 99 for Miami Jimmy butler The butler did it power formulas blue Tyrese Halliburton Pacers. This one's number 299 orange die-cut Anthony Davis power formulas Lakers Look at Donch it spell bounce Mavericks Everybody full sell-out promo Let me change some timers really quick I forgot to do that Personals are gonna be full One sec guys trying to pin a message here Sorry, we'll keep going in a sec. Just want to make sure this is pinned.  Let's get corkings filled up guys. Leap's gonna fill up. Just fine. It looks like Kevin Durant elite deck for the Nets Musta Diabate orange Corey Kispert for the wizards W Wake a box break a box break what Kings LeBron James? Come on monster pen pals monster pen pals orange Anthony Simons for Portland's pen pals No, no star signs which one which one which one it is elite signatures to 49 now gets again. Jamal Murray Brian are with both of the hits so far There you go, Brian on card Murray as well purple crystal arteta 49 Indiana Pacers Let's go magic Nicola Yolkich power formulas. Who's the better center Chewbacca or Yolkich orange LeBron James spell bounce Yeah Chewbacca something more of a scene player LeBron James spell bounce Someone who's just joining has no idea Chewbacca doesn't even play basketball You know what it is on my team he does LeBron James tidal waves it's Lakers LeBron tidal waves He's got a few of those a few teams of those Let's get the brakes filled up.  We're gonna finish behind tonight. Personals are full Get as many as we can when breaks finish Sheila Williams red 94 rookie thunder Chewie is the Dirk type Dear and Fox swiper power formulas. He's more of us a journey so galskis orange spellbound Trey young Hawks Big C. I think he's a more big Z but big C because it's Chewbacca. Yeah, Trey young spell bounce Hawks Want to go an elite guys Corkings after that needs some needs some love So we love Corkings Scotty Barnes on the elite deck Dory and Finney Smith 58 of 99 Mavericks. We got a spellbound Luca on the blue color match 55 out of 99 Orange Jalen Green power formulas rockets Steph Curry spell bounds Got Kawhi Leonard Clarity Clippers But again y'all full sellout promo tonight Every spot purchased in a break is one spot in the random at the end of the night with the chance to win a hundred dollars break credit That'll be more if you buy more spots was money jang rookie thunder You can win more than once but top four names in the randomized at the end of the night of every single group Break that's taking place We each get a hundred bucks and break credit. So there account orange maxi clever mavericks, which means you have to have an account. I Think most of you do But may as well get an account and you get points for break credit and All that good stuff Spellbound Zion pelicans and here's another thing you do if you like saving money On our home page if you scroll down below it to where like the breaks are showing We have a newsletter you can sign up for Just put your phone number in there and you'll get text alerts when we send out coupons that way or when certain breaks are listed orange Caruso bulls That's a pretty good way to save some money, too. We sent one out what last week David Roddy new breed rookie auto Grizzlies three of 49. There you go Logan David Roddy Rookie tie-tie Washington junior for the Rockets there. I gotta be tie-tie senior. That's a cool name Marcus Morris Star saddest Anthony Edwards Timberwolves orange on a nobie Raptors, maybe that's just a team color It is Duncan Robinson turn of the century gold auto. Yeah eight of ten heat Miami very nice Good hit their combo in this You go Miami good stuff there you guys here's a link for Core Kings Hey, yeah, nice one Eric. It's not always fun to get a combo team in the random It doesn't mean they can't hit doesn't mean they can't hit She's solid gold auto right there always a chance, right? Star status Kevin Durant is Kevin Durant a star Power formulas orange Jalen Brown Celtics Luca Spellbound a lot of Lucas Spellbound here. We probably spell the name Had if I had time to spell right now I would Carry everything full throttle Full throttle Tyree smart and Hawks rookie base Again rookies are short printed about two rookies per per box Orange South Curry for the net so even if the rookies aren't numbered they are still a short printed any leaps Maybe basketball anyway. Yeah genre graph 76ers Alan Iverson That's sick, dude. That's what's up the answer dude. Who doesn't like Alan Iverson? impossible Maybe if you're a TGI Friday server, I don't know Awesome AI congrats. Thanks. There's that was a base genre graphs right there good stuff Kobe white on the blue number to 99 bulls One down more junior rookie orange for the Timberwolves Where's that one at this week? Spellbound LeBron orange like a three week break after Australia think and then You said it ramps up after that then yeah, Luca power formulas Probably should start with Instead of Saudi Arabia, but that's where like they're based Zach Levine power formulas F1's base where? Jake Larabia Grizzly's rookie Kristaps orange whoa really quite different Then Miami then Italy travel what why would they do that spellbound Zion? I keep asking this every time we bring it up and I there's never a good answer Because I don't think there is a good answer Tatum power formulas Celtics They're taking it the other direction They really are man And time efficiency. Oh, yeah time efficiency spellbound John Moran Star status Steph Curry warriors Redemption Blake Wesley pen pals that'll be spurs Spurs Blake Wesley pen pals pretty good.  Oh, wow. Oh, dude Robin's cooking. Don't let Robin cook No pizza for us zero pizza. That's okay. They don't deliver here anyway Maybe I'll still bring some in tomorrow. I'll see Someone's all always a remark goes around here anyway, so I see some teams coming in. Thank you very much y'all Do appreciate that again. We're gonna give away some break credit We fill up every break tonight Elite is sold out next court Kings is at 12 and 16 now. So we do have some movement there Few teams here and there Good stuff Nine to go on elite court contenders six bucks mixture six series at seven and ten. That's awesome limited divisions at five Spots coming in all over the place guys.  Yeah, LeBron blue power formulas Lakers to 99 39 of 99 That's outcast for sure Man, don't let Chad hear that or any power formulas John Moran spell bounce, I won't even repeat it. I don't want to I Don't want your silly hot takes to just be Brought up and chat for your sake Never heard of your clarity. Oh, no No guys cows getting outcasts confused with black eyed peas somehow. I Guess they're both hip-hop groups to 49 Alex Caruso bulls Star status John Moran Outcast is a thousand and big boy orange spellbound John Moran's Yeah, LeBron's got a lot of inserts in this product for sure Edwards full throttle timber wolves full throttle Brad just love that video Dear and Fox elite deck, you know what I'm talking about now Taco Bell take David Roddy Grizzly's rookie base Orange Deandre Hunter for Atlanta who you guys got in the series the Cavaliers are the Knicks Spellbound Edwards T-Wolves Your depth is a little little little better orange Duarte Pacers Caves in four. Good God And Raptors on the new breed rookie auto Christian Coloco Coloco mo Mark Williams rookie for the Hornets now. He's been pretty good this year and check out quiet Orange Tom around goes his return trying to give away break credit and check out quiet Maybe they're all buying spots right now Crosses nicks and six. Yeah, like I don't I don't think have them for but Okay counting came to power formula there They rhyme so I think that's why Carl's saying it Orange Jamal Murray Nuggets Brunson's a beast, but so is Mitchell and turn of the century auto Clippers Jamal Crawford J crossover. That's pretty cool That's another player I feel like everybody likes all cropped All right, give me one sec real quick recap here. We may not recap every break tonight if we're gonna be behind but Five seven ten cool. All right real quick one here rope over here. So we had the Jamal Crawford Christian Coloco Spurs Blake Wesley pen pals redemption that'll be an on-card nice hit spurs genre graphs Alan Iverson 76ers turn of the century gold auto Duncan Robinson heat. This is eight of ten. I believe Eight of ten new breed David Roddy Grizzly's auto three of 49 rookie there You lead signatures on card to 49 Jamal Murray Nuggets and in Michael Porter Jr. turn of the century auto Nuggets Thanks again everybody another four boxer of this coming up next


Code reviews can be time consuming, often resulting in a long list of suggestions and comments, and ensuring quality and security of your code requires effective communication. GitLab Duo Code Review Summary fosters this by providing a concise summary of all suggestions and comments in a review thread. As reviewers perform a code review, they provide many suggestions and comments that span multiple lines of a source code file. When the reviewer is finished, they can leverage Code Review Summary to generate a concise paragraph of all of their feedback before submitting, enabling a better handoff. Code Review Summary improves communication and streamlines the review process for authors and reviewers, ensuring quality code without the hassle.


A Nollywood actress, Adama is dead. The death of the actress was confirmed by the president of Actors Guild of Nigeria, Emeka Rolos. According to several reports, the actress was said to have been a guest of an old company's top short and his family, when she suddenly slumped during a gathering. She was reportedly rushed to the NNPC hospital in Worried Delta State, where she was confirmed dead. Hello, hope you enjoyed the news. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.