Okay, so we're going to start this panel by asking each one of you guys What is the reason you would do a keto diet? What is the main reason you're you're doing a low-carbohydrate? So let's let's go ladies first. I Came to the weight loss state for the mood stability. I Used to have a type 2 bipolar disorder and I've been off meds for almost 10 years So most people start keto as a tool for losing weight. In my case, I actually started keto to gain weight This is something that Wasn't very open until a few years ago I was anorexic and I started keto because I found that it helped me in a way found control cravings And so it helped me gain the good type of way I actually don't do a ketogenic diet any more metabolic flexibility But if I was kiteboarding and got dropped on my head and had a TBI or traumatic brain injury or some type of pathology Then I would be definitely ketogenic. I've actually been carrying a ketogenic gasker in my kiteboarding kit just in case They didn't give me a mind. So It started there Okay, then I have a couple of pre-written questions and we're gonna go open to open Mike What's the difference between a ketogenic diet and an ancestral diet? Can they coexist already completely different because the meme is that oh, I'm doing pale or you're just eating bacon and Fat is that is that true? Can they coexist? What's the difference between them? I think that a ketogenic diet can be done in a completely non-ancestral way and probably it would be very hard to replicate the ancestral diet completely anyway but I do also think that an ancestral diet would be ketogenic if not Necessarily all the time a lot of the time and so I think they they overlap I Agree very much with amber. I think that depending on exactly where the population leave They would be either in some seasons ketogenic or in that degree of ketosis or of course They leave that more closer to the equator. Of course, they would not be ketogenic all the time or even even For key a genetic I like the definition of nutritional ketosis, which is probably point five millimolars of ketones VHB So if you're using that as your cutoff of at least an entry point then you can try a bunch of different approaches to see where you end up um a substantial overlap between diets of our ancestors and A more sane or a kind of we're chatting up here before they hit his mikes about The idea that you know carbs aren't necessarily the devil they may be in certain cases with specific conditions But if you're an ultra marathon runner if you're a high-level jiu-jitsu person And you're not taking in some amount of carbohydrate that would kind of blow the traditional ketogenic model You're gonna blow it your sport. They'll stop. I mean like there's just Very very old data and even the people that sort of run keto a lot of them will actually train low and compete high I really liked Mike's point about what what ketosis actually is and if you're going to think about it from the point of say point five millimoles then That's very different from what someone might think automatically when they think about a ketogenic diet that's being used there Therapeutically where you might want to be in the two millimolar range And so sometimes when people are arguing is a ketogenic diet Ancestral or worse such as such a group ketogenic they're arguing past each other because one of them is thinking there To be ketogenic you have to be at this very deep level of ketosis and it has to be all the time And so I'm thinking about that quantitatively does clear up a lot of things Speaking of ketosis and Quantifying that is it necessary to quantify ketones for let's say weight loss I think that that ketones themselves can be a real red herring for weight loss Yes, it can show that you're burning fat. It doesn't say where that fat's coming from also Just being in the state of ketosis can sometimes be sufficient to reach a lot of Goals health goals including weight loss, but then having more ketones doesn't necessarily mean that your goals are being reached more efficiently if you follow the fallacious reasoning to its end point you would think that adding more ketones from the outside or adding more fat might cause you to lose weight and maybe it does in certain contexts, but not necessarily Yeah for fat less specifically I tend to say Chased results because people get They started here using exogenous ketones or adding fat and they forget that They're already getting results. They don't just need to be more fat or more ketones ketones are as you know Like I said, it really depends on where those ketones come from or where they are generated either the benefit or Yeah, I agree. We have to keep in mind what we're actually looking at So that's just a marker of the blood levels of ketones That doesn't really tell us anything about what's coming in or what's going out It'd be like filling your bathtub and just looking at the level of water in there It doesn't tell you how much water is coming in or how big a drain there is on the top It just tells you the level and so I think some people get stuck in My ketones are an I know so I need like, you know Four more tablespoons of butter to lose weight to get my ketones up and it's just kind of a down one spiral from there That started way down the spiral and then it got progressively worse. Hi I mean we see it all the time. I mean when we kind of live in a ketogenic community in our community across all Spirons We'll just get repeated and people say Well, I think they've lost 35 pounds and remiss symptoms of type 2 diabetes They no longer have the issue the you know with PCOS They don't have issues of endometriosis like all of these things is naturally good. I got they don't hit 0.7 Then you know Finnegan Bowling to say that I'm not ketogenic and therefore bad things are gonna happen More is better within we have to say calories don't matter because for a lot of people myself included to get I mean I am nothing but lard and salt for two years. There's no palatable way to be frozen lard and salt Never did I test above 0.6 That's right I mean I just think it's an absurd conclusion to say more ketones equals more fat loss It just needs more use of that But you know the head amber it's either from your plater But both at the same time at least after we get past where the metabolic inefficiency state your keto where You know the body doesn't really have all of the enzymes operating in all of the receptors You've got that nearly as rapidly as it does later. I could write an analogy that once Someone said to me is like trying to determine the speed of your car by looking at the gas gauge So yeah, so you're looking at energy levels and trying to determine if having more ketones Means that you're losing more fat. It's not just available energy You know we got into the trouble with vitamin D when we figure out how to test vitamin D levels And then we can just apply some vitamin D You can see there's like vitamin D floating in the bloodstream, but is it really activating the receptors? Or you know when you convert some like vitamin D, you're having different pathways activated But you know if you have no vitamin D levels Ingesting a little vitamin D can be beneficial for certain out of conditions. Is there any benefit to exogenous ketones? Mike you talked about TBI Is there any benefit to having exogenous ketones in your bloodstream?  You're gonna have a high amount of inflammatory mechanisms things of that nature And I always look at what's the potential upside what's the potential downside if I can do a ketogenic diet We've got pretty good data to show that there's probably not a bunch of huge downsides Just the other issues you can talk about later the upside that is it probably hasn't been entirely clearly defined But for me personally, I'll take that risk because I'm mitigating the downside and I'm not really sure of the potential upside So ketones there can possibly have a direct anti-inflammatory effect and they also serve to pinch it as another fuel source While your brain is going through that process of trying to heal So I want to tack on to that really quickly One of the interesting things about ketone salts or ketone esters is it's kind of a novel place in human and evolutionary Physiology because ketones are a byproduct of either a starvation or a human starvation or of an endo Disagree with my conclusions here, and that's okay But they are functionally the fuel of the absence of carbohydrate But we see a lot of people using exogenous ketones who are not depriving themselves of carbohydrate and so it is a very weirdly novel environment That you're introducing that doesn't exist in the history of human physiology throughout all of ancestry we At least not that we have any markers or indicators of or anything in the genome that would indicate that to be And so it's it's an interesting place This stop and think about for just a second to say is it harmful probably not in small doses But when people are desperate and they're trying to lose weight or remiss symptoms of the condition and they're doing this thing where they've decided Their doctor doesn't know what they're talking about and therefore they're gonna do it on their own And somebody tells them that they cured Ebola with exogenous ketones They'll buy it and they'll do it and literally I Spoke going at a conference. It was actually a local USA two years ago She was spending $1,500 and one fun exogenous ketones There's a real downside to these things for people or this is a fraternity true But you know that's Believering the point. I apologize, but it's just in it's a I think that there are applications, right? You know neurodegeneration oncologic care for certain cancers Yeah, sure run those ketones as high as you can but again it circles back to the fallacy that more is better And it's just completely lacking in evidence. So I'm actually gonna agree with you I don't think that that we do have a precedent for high ketones with high glucose well except for diabetes, right? And that's not a state. We really want to replicate But to your to your other point That there may be certain situations where you want to get Ketones high as quickly as possible like in the dramatic range or if you didn't happen to be ketogenic that day that you had that accident Maybe you want to do that really quickly or if you have someone who is a patient and isn't complying or if you have someone Who's insulin is up for other reasons that don't have anything to do with? Normal physiology and it's preventing their ketones from going up high that could be a reason But we don't know exactly which of the benefits of the ketogenic diet are coming directly from the Ketones we know we know some of them because there are some studies where ketones are given and we can see that there are anti-inflammatory effects for example, but when you change the context all those pathways are up to change So it's it's not no you brought up a really interesting point when you You mentioned that the effects of the ketones, but we need to also appreciate that BHP and high doses actually shows a down-regulation Insensitive like this in the adipocyte so if we're trying to lose fat, I mean again shifting away from a therapeutic context There is actually a potential detriment to running ketones extremely high because it is going to down-regulate the life-alysis so What would be the not just specific populations, but like let's say you want to try keto a ketogenic diet Where would you set that protein intake is you know, do we want to restrict a protein intake to prevent? Protein to the genesis do we want to keep protein high to prevent muscle loss where what would be your recommendations for protein intake? So you you phrased it in a way that is I'm really glad you said what would be a good starting point And I think that the best starting point the easiest starting point unless like we were talking about earlier There's an immediate therapeutic need to get really high ketones Then I think you should start ad libitum actually Cut out the carbohydrates to some low level and then eat fat and protein to What's desired and see where that gets you and then only if that's not getting you the results that you need Then you might start playing with higher fat or higher protein and you know, it's funny You said it was controversial and and I agree that it that it can be I don't know if it is among this panel, but Some people think that if you in particular for weight loss that if you want to lose more weight you have to You should be cutting the fat down and raising the protein up and other people Are saying that you need to cut the protein down and raise the fat And I think there are really good arguments on both sides And we're not really sure why one would be better for one person and why the other would be better for another So I think a lot of personal experimentation is warranted Okay, so for starters, I would say it really depends on the context Even though you said that a general application. I Wouldn't really do that You know my general recommendation because for for us, especially in people who we work with if we see that the person is over 40 I would and of course depending if the person wants to actually Review macros and count. I would give a specific recommendation if the person just wants to start the diet I would go very much like with Amberset Just eat basically meats and some side veggies if you would like vegetables and Pretty much eat at leave. That's my usual recommendation if the person actually wants to You know lose weight and actually wants to count macros. I'd rather have a focus on Whole foods that include both protein and fat basically just use a fat that comes along with the protein and If we get people that are over 40, I would put a little more emphasis on protein because I'm very Pro protein in the sense that I prefer people to avoid Psychopenia at any cost and I see people especially Women that are afraid of eating protein and so when they started kidney diet They end up on 35 40 grams of protein at a because of the fear of you know getting bulkier or Not losing weight because of the protein and then yeah, they may lose weight at the start But at the expense of also losing lean mass and then they saw and that's how you actually down-regulate your basal metabolic Rate because you're losing muscle mass, right Yeah, I agree that the context matters I mean there's a study looking at protein synthetic response in younger people age 20 versus average age of 71 They used weight protein as a supplement the younger people got a pretty good response from 20 grams the older people needed 40 grams So they needed twice the amount to get the same acute response But if you're looking at a therapeutic thing where you're really trying to get someone into a high state of ketosis for whatever reason I agree kind of what they said look at their diets you where they're at probably cut back on carbohydrates Most of my experience if I'm doing that you probably need to get below 50 at a minimum to start out and see where you're at From there, then you're just balancing to see do I want to scale back protein a little bit What are the pros and cons of that or maybe you don't want to add a little bit more fat? But yeah, I have concerns about having a very very low protein intake especially in an older population No, I would completely echo the sentiment here. There's There is just much less data of harm from over-eating protein than there is from harm of under-eating protein Then we can have a complete sidebar in the hallway about plant versus animal proteins and all that fun conversation But setting aside all of that and just saying when in doubt generally a little bit more is not going to hurt you Within the context or the framework of having like a proper amount of calories relative to what you're trying to accomplish Whether that's weight loss whether it's therapeutic and you don't need to concern yourself necessarily with that whether it's like catechic losses or Do we have any questions Jody so our first question is For a keto diet, would you recommend that for digestive issues IBS? different different digestive struggles I Personally would recommend a plant-free diet for digestive issues often the biggest problem with digestion is too much fiber and or Susceptibility to plant toxins because of increased intestinal permeability that make plants that otherwise might be very healthy or benign become a difficulty in digestion and autoimmune diseases I can actually answer this because I'm a practitioner and I see people with IBS so it depends Yes, it doesn't probability big problem What I've seen a lot of times is that people are not trying to get to the root cause of what's causing the IBS It could be you know an infection parasites. It could be toxic load it could be an autoimmune response to To you know, whatever you're eating So investigating what the root cause of the problem is and maybe use a you know Very small diet or a restricted diet where you're eliminating carbohydrates, you know a ketogenic diet tends to be a little bit more hypoallergenic and Working with that frame That can be very very beneficial for IBS The problem that I do see at my practice is that sometimes when you start doing really small narrow diets You feel a little bit better and you keep narrowing down and narrowing down and then you end up with orthorexia So if you have a very narrow diet trying to investigate what the root cause of the problem and then reintroduce stuff in order to have you know Social lifestyle and so you can enjoy your life. That would be Very beneficial, but yeah starting with a ketogenic diet. It's a very good starting point because it tends to be very hypoallergenic I would send them to Guillermo or someone who's a practitioner But in general probably some type of elimination type diet and I agree with this point then the question I always tell clients to go back and ask their doctors. How long do I run this? How long do I feel good? Whatever markers you're using and then how do you expand it back out on the other side? So I see a lot of people just do elimination type diet They felt amazing and now they're convinced that they have to only eat four foods the rest of their entire life I mean, there is data out there that clearly shows that eating a ketogenic diet is a stensibly important to say it damages gut microbiota I'm not sure that that's a conclusion. I'm willing to science yet.  How would you do that effectively or can you do that? I would say the question is how do you transition out of a ketogenic type approach? I do work at the fair amount of those people and the short version is if you're going to ketogenic diet you can have some changes at the muscle level in relation to insulin So just giving them a boatload of carbohydrates usually isn't going to go very well I find that just slowly working out their carbohydrate amount works good.  I don't need all the cards I can find. Oh, I feel horrible now. What happened? It's like you probably went a little bit too hard too fast and your body wasn't prepared to handle it In our case what we do very much is that approach It's not like we tell a client. Okay, you can have a 40 50 extra grams of carbs And then go and have a donut or something now It's like okay We transition from keto to a semi-pallet approach and then the cars are gonna have like you said probably post-exercise Good healthy type of cars and truth here are some vegetables there potato, etc. And then it takes probably in our case I'd say four to six months to have someone from probably 20 grams of carbs To about a hundred and twenty one hundred and fifty without any stomach or any issues whatsoever So there is clear physical resistance that happens in a chronic ketogenic state But there's also the up-regulation of fat capacity to take fat directly in the cell tissue. So From that perspective yet you have to kind of play with Slowly moving scale because if you don't it's just bathroom time like crazy. And maybe that's just me This one is about the concerns about Sorry, I just wanted to add something When I first started a ketogenic diet 20 more than 20 years ago. I was very influenced by Lawn McDonald who He talked about doing a cyclic ketogenic diet, which a lot of bodybuilders did and so there was a period in my life where I was on a Very low-carb diet throughout the week and every Friday night I would go to the bar and have fries and beer and it was fine for me I don't know if that would address the person's question about whether that would fix problems with the microbiome But I'm not sure that I know that we know that the ketogenic diet gives problems to the microbiome But but it's not always the case that I think some people can really tolerate Rapid switches back and forth and that can maybe address concerns about Chronic ketosis and you could do a ketogenic diet with keto brownies and keto pizza And then and then go and have beer and chicken wings or you can do and you know vegetables and and meat and then To cycle in carbohydrates you can use root to verse and you know, so you can do it smartly This one is about the concerns about the ketogenic diet And I'll just list off like three things here that overlap a few questions. Any worry about amptour stimulation and cancer No Problems of cardio with cardiovascular disease or cancer and then also another person asked about microbiome Deficiencies and downright healing in a pathway. I want to add to that nutritional deficiencies by excluding or groups of foods Any opinions now? There's a way to eat like a composition and all of that. The same thing happens in the Paleo space and the Keto space Is such a complicated cascade that this idea that in tour or stimulation equals cancer is just it's dead on a rival to People that really look into some of the stuff does that mean that? We should constantly stay in a state where we're stimulating that pathway or no, but that's kind of the point We should be eating should probably have to do with the fact that we should too much in nutrition And so we're constantly stimulating that cascade of anabolism and that in itself is problematic But it ain't because of the fact that I think people to be honest I think this I want to add about m tour m tour is a signal it takes in a signal of getting fed And so there's really no way to constantly keep m tour down without not eating So you have to eat something and and I agree with tyler that the best way to approach that is to To separate the signals so you stimulate it and then you stop stimulating it And one advantage that I think a ketogenic diet has in that respect is that you can go much quicker from the state of Fully fed and stimulating m tour even with a with a huge steak You know as much as possible with protein And then the amount of time it takes to get back into that Autophagy phase where m tour is being inhibited has got to be I don't think we have exact times in any study But it's got to be quicker than the two or three days of fasting that it would take from a high carb diet And so I like to think that If you're on a ketogenic diet, you're probably in a state of optimal autophagy overnight Compared to somebody who's on a high carb diet and has to wait for three days of fasting And do that in a targeted way over and over in order to get those benefits Yeah, I just would like to complete a complete amber that people are now really fasting because of autophagy and there are various ways to Generate autophagy certain types of foods strength training Exercise of course, but also ketogenic diet.  So it's down. So it's like a switch It's a ging and jang you have periods of growth and creation and then you have periods of sanitation in a way The other thing I would add is if your overall dietary approach is more restrictive, whether that's a keto meat in whatever There's like you said, there's definitely ways you can do it and do it well You just have to be aware that it's going to take you a lot more Effort and it's going to be a lot more conscious to do that The less restrictions you have in general you have the opportunity to eat more variety and probably Miss a lot of those micronutrient deficiencies. So it doesn't necessarily mean that one is going to be worse than the other You just if you're going to be a vegan and do it a very healthy way You can do that But there's a lot of other things you have to pay attention to Because you're taking an approach that is more restrictive to start with I tend to When people ask me this question, I just give them a certain types of examples For example, people tend to say well, you cannot restrict that whole micronutrient And if you actually do a well A well-prepared ketogenic diet Most people I'm not saying a lot end up eating more vegetables than they were eating before Like at 20 or 30 or 50 grams of carbohydrates That's a lot of food volume coming from vegetables and people tend to say oh with vitamin c well instead of having an orange Just look at for example Broccoli it has more vitamin c when compared to 100 grams of Orange juice or potassium and they show your banana Well, just look at red meat and look at avocado for example and so on and so forth I haven't found yet a single nutrient that you cannot get on a well-firmly ketogenic diet in similar Or even better quantities I've been so far almost 20 years in keto And i'm not that yet Yeah, but I I will just say that When I say these people tell me you've been on ketosis for 21 years. Like you've never had a pizza Like it doesn't it's not like that. It's like I may go out of ketosis for I don't know five Six seven times a year when I feel like if I have a want to have a slice of pizza I want I want to carve or whatever something that I do bridge sporadically. So I'm not really Completely in ketosis all the time pretty much like people who are not in ketosis may go into ketosis overnight because they've been fasting for 12 or whatever hours Nothing happens people that go Just by chance into ketosis don't that so the same happens to people that have been doing keto for a while The only thing I would add is that you Like if you do any new dietary approach if I don't talk to your physician have a basic blood panel at least run Do whatever intervention you're going to do and have another blood panel run at that point I have seen very very circumstances some just wonky numbers from people that have done a ketogenic diet It's definitely not the norm. It's definitely I'd say more of the exception Most of the other data we have you know the betrari foundation things like that We don't see a lot of long-term issues But anytime you're doing a different intervention you want to make sure you know What your own data is just in case there is something that's odd about your specific physiology So and we're going to throw this over your way because I know you've talked a little bit of how you already eyes probably change with respect to the macronutrient composition of diets and it's not by any means my area of expertise, but I don't want to put you on the spot but in response to like using blood markers as an indication There may be some complications to that that we haven't really thought Thank you. Yes, uh


The next feature that I want to introduce, I'll actually first go through the core functionality that was introduced in version 39 of DHS2, and then talk about the web application that was released shortly thereafter and is available in 39 and now in 240 as well. This is the data exchange functionality. So in version 39 and now 40 as well, we have the ability to submit or send data from one DHS2 instance to another, as well as to transform data within a particular DHS2 instance. This is a very powerful feature, particularly when you have multiple instances spread out within a country or maybe multiple countries reporting to a global instance or those types of workflows, because it allows the user of the downstream instance to configure and then review a submission before it gets sent to the upstream service. And then everything else happens behind the scenes. So the configuration needs to happen to say this data element should go to this data element in my target system. And then I want to review that before I send it and then I can click go. What we'll talk about in a minute, which was introduced shortly after the 39 release and is now included in the 40 release is the ability to review that data in a visual user interface and then click submit to actively submit it. I'll talk also a little bit about the functionality of transforming data within a particular DHS2 instance. This is incredibly powerful because it supports tracker data as well. So you can actually transform a program indicator into a data value in the DHS2 instance and also do that across the boundary between different DHS2 instances. So you could submit the program indicator output from data that is collected in the tracker data model and you can then put that into an aggregate data model within the same instance or in another instance upstream where it can then be compared with other data without needing access to the individual level data. So this is again just describing what is happening under the hood there. Importantly, you can run this ad hoc which we'll talk about how you can do that with the new data exchange application and you can also run it as a scheduled job. So it just happens automatically behind the scenes without any user needing to interact with or review it. The target is always aggregate data model but you can start from either aggregate or tracker which is very powerful. So this is one way to aggregate tracker data into an HMIS instance, for example. So if you have a tracker COVID-19 vaccination tracker and you want to basically aggregate the total number of vaccines delivered by age group and then send that to the HMIS instance where you want to store just the aggregate total numbers you can do that with the aggregate data exchange app and the tracker data stays in the COVID-19 instance and the aggregate data lives in the HMIS instance. So there are many other use cases for this. Data portals are also or public data access is also another one where you want to send and review only the specific data that gets sent to a separate DHS2 instance particularly for public data access for security and privacy concerns that is possible with this functionality as well. And again, the value of pre-computing program indicators and sending those into the aggregate data model is quite powerful. So this is what the application actually looks like. This again was introduced after DHS2 version 39 was released and it's available for both 39 and 40. It's available on the app hub and what it allows you to do is to review and submit data for one of these data exchanges. So once the exchange has been configured within your DHS2 instance, you can review that data. As you can see here, you're reviewing the different organization units and the actual data for different periods and different in this case data elements that you want to submit to the upstream system. And then you click the submit data button and it allows you to actually perform that submission. Again, you can do this. This is the way you can do it manually or ad hoc but you can also schedule this to run on an automated basis if you don't need to review it every single time. But this is very helpful for being able to review that data and then submit it. This is useful also for global reporting from countries to international donors.


the National Conservative 10 principles. Now, we're going to talk about these. I want you to note before we even get started, the things that are not there, right? The things that are not there. And the first thing you'll notice, and we'll look at all 10, and you can read them along with me and we can look for them, is the fact that the individual is not mentioned, maybe once. Liberty is not mentioned, maybe once. Capitalism is not mentioned, certainly not mentioned. Rights, rights, the concept of rights, the concept of individual rights. And I've been railing over this issue because of Rosa Vista's weight and the idea that nobody on the right cares about rights, the Supreme Court doesn't seem to care about rights, nobody really cares about rights, they don't have an understanding of rights, they don't think about rights. Rights, individual rights, don't make an appearance. Don't make an appearance on the National Conservative platform, so just consider that. This might be, I think right now, the biggest, most influential of all the Conservative movements out there, among the intellectuals, they're the ones, I think, that are going to set that gender for the future of the Conservative movement, future of the Conservative movement. Individualism, no. Capitalism, no. Individual rights, the founding concept of America, no. None of those. This is where Trump has bought us. They're not a single, you know, significant, they mention constitution, not particularly the US constitution, as we'll see, because this is a globalist, no, not globalist, an international movement. I was kidding, they're against globalism, the anti-concept of globalism, which means nothing. All right, so let's look at this. The first one is national independence, national independence, and this one's interesting. We wish to see a world of independent nations. Cool, so do I. Each nation capable of self-government should chart its own course in accordance with its own particular constitutional, linguistic, and religious inheritance. Each has a right to maintain its own borders, and conduct policies that will benefit its own people. We endorse a policy of rearmament by independent self-governing nations and of defensive alliances whose purpose is to deter imperialist aggressions. What is missing from this statement? What is missing from this statement? What's missing from this statement is freedom. Each nation capable of self-government should chart its own course. What if that course is authoritarian? What if its constitution allows authoritarianism? And of course, what dictates the course of a nation? Constitution, okay, linguistic, no, linguistic, right? What's really important is language, really? Wouldn't it be cooler if every country in the world spoke English? Language, that's what's crucial. That's what defines a nation and religious inheritance. So this is all about the past, all about tradition, all about where you came from, all about your ethnic group, all about your tribe. Where is freedom? I mean, I get having a political principle, one of those being national independence, you want independent nation states, but wouldn't you say I want to see independent nation states that preserve freedom, protect the rights of their citizens? Or even if you don't want to use the concept rights, at least some semblance of non-authoritarianism? No, they don't care. You can be a democracy, you can be a constitutional republic, you can be a authoritarian state, you can be Putin, you can be Xi, you can be any one of these people, any one of these people, as long as, as long as you're governing in accordance with a constitution, it doesn't say, it doesn't say whether it's a good constitution, bad constitution, what the purpose of the constitution is, it doesn't say any of that. As long as you speak the language of your forebearers, and as long as you respect religion, you're called Putin qualifies here completely. So does Xi, by the way. So does Xi. So national independence, not individual sovereignty, God forbid, not individualism, not freedom, not rights, national independence. Second, rejection of imperialism and globalism, I know. Like, I don't like imperialism, and you know, if you mean by globalism, one world government, I don't like that either. But why is this negative number two? Number two, now, what's fascinating about here is the moral equivalency that we're gonna see. So he says, we support a system of free cooperation and competition among nation-states. Working together through trade treaties, defense alliances and other common projects that respect the independence of their members. Again, nothing about an alliance of free countries or authoritarian, nothing, right? I mean, how about we reject authoritarianism? Before we reject imperialism, globalism. Nope, we're not gonna do that, right? But we oppose transferring the authority of elected governments to transnational or supernatural bodies. I oppose that too. A trend that pretends to high moral legitimacy even as it weakens representative government sows public alienation and distrust and strengthens the influence of autocratic regimes. Why are you against autocratic regimes? I haven't seen a principle here that's anti-autocratic regimes. Accordingly, they say, we reject imperialism in its various contemporary forms. We condemn the imperialism of China, Russia. This is why it's in here. It's to distance themselves a little bit from Russia. But note the moral equivalency now and other authoritarian powers. And then he says, but we also oppose the liberal imperialism of the last generation which sought to gain power, influence and wealth by dominating other nations and trying to remake them in its own image.  That to them is imperialism. Classical liberal ideas, western ideas, the ideas of the Enlightenment. That to them is imperialism. Going to the rest of the world and saying, look, the best system of government is the American system of government. The best system of government is freedom, individualism, a system based on those ideas, the respects, the rights of its citizens. That is the liberal order which they oppose. That is liberal imperialism. And of course, they lumping together. So that is the equivalent of, right? That is the equivalent of, Russia invaded Ukraine and Chinese, I don't know, taking over Tibet and maybe wanting to take over Taiwan and so on. Unbelievable. And note again, what they're really all about, and this came out in my debate with you on Khazoni, what they're really all about is a rejection of individualism. What they're really all about is a rejection of individual liberty. This is a collectivist, exclusively collectivist movement that is not about preserving the rights of the individual, but is all about preserving traditions. It's all about nationalism. It's all about tribalism. All right, National Government, maybe here they'll tell us a little bit about the purpose of government. What's the purpose of government, right? What a government's instituted among men to do. Maybe we'll find out from this. Abuyin says he has $1,000 ready. Well, what's going on? Where is it, Abuyin? 10,000, he says he's got $10,000 ready. All right, ooh, we've got a lot of super chat questions. This is great, thank you guys. Lots of questions, it's good. So be a long show today. All right, third is National Government. The Independent Nations State is instituted to establish a more perfect union among the diverse communities, parties and regions of a given nation, to provide for their common defense and justice among them and to secure the general welfare and the blessings of liberty for this time and for future generations. Okay, liberty, one appearance. There it is, liberty. Liberty for whom? Notice, no individuals mentioned here to preserve a perfect union among diverse communities, parties and regions for the common defense and justice among all. General welfare and blessing of liberty for whom? For this and for future generations. I mean, this is horrible. We believe in a strong but limited state limited by what principle? Limited by what principle? Subject, the constitutional restraints and the division of power, constitutional restraints and division of power aimed at what? We recommend a dramatic reduction in the scope and administrative state and the policymaking judiciary and the displaced legislature representing the full range of the nation's interest and values. This is the point with the Supreme Court as well. So this Supreme Court is going to be very good at challenging the administrative state. We saw it in the EPA ruling, the last ruling before the break where they said the EPA cannot regulate CO2 because Congress hasn't given them authority to do so and we won't allow regulatory agencies to do things that the law has not permitted them to do. Will we allow the law to permit them to regulate these things? Yes, we're great with the law. If it goes through the legislative process, we're good with it. We're not good, which is good, right? It's better than the alternative, right? I don't like these agencies doing whatever the hell they want and that's a good thing to step in the right direction. It's gonna limit these regulatory agencies' power over our lives. But note here that they're not trying to reduce the scope for the sake of liberty, but it's for the sake of giving the power back to the legislature and if the legislature wants to reduce our liberty, that's fine, they don't have a problem with that. We recommend the Federalist Principle which prescribes a delegation of power to the respective states or the Federalists, of course, or subdivisions of the nation so as to allow greater variation, experimentation, and freedom. However, in those states, this is really interesting, really interesting, in those states of subdivisions in which the law and justice have been manifestly corrupted, or, this isn't or, in which lawlessness, immorality, immorality and disillusioned reign, national government must intervene energetically to restore order. Immorality, not just lawlessness, I get all lawlessness, right? But so if there's a state in which, I don't know, gays are allowed to marry, or in there's a state in which somebody is allowed to do something that the national government views as being immoral, not illegal, immoral, they should go in, well, we know what code, we know exactly what code. The code of the religion prevailing in the state, in the country, we'll get to Christian country in a minute. We know exactly what code. It's the code of Christianity. So the federal government, they believe in federalism, unless immorality is allowed in the state, not violation of rights, not violation of the constitution, not 14 amendment stuff. You're doing something that we deem as immoral, we're gonna intervene in the state, shut you down. The federal government must intervene energetically to restore order, energetically, right? Four, why is this only number four? I thought this would be number one. God and public religion. No nation can long endure without humility and gratitude before God and fear of his judgment that are found in authentic religious tradition. How did this country survive? I don't think this country is founded on humility and gratitude. Maybe I'm misinterpreting the founding fathers, but that's not the sentiments I got from the founding fathers. For millennia, the Bible has been our surest guide, nourishing a fitting orientation towards God, to the political traditions of the nation, to public morals, to the defense of the weak, altruism and to the recognition of things rightly regarded as sacred. This is very cringe.  This is your new conservative movement. This is what Trump has brought to us. This, if you've read dim, these are the intellectuals Leonard Peacock warned us against. The Bible should be read as the first among the sources of a shared Western civilization in schools and universities, schools. And as the rightful inheritance of believers and non-believers alike, where a Christian majority exists, pay attention, pay attention, where a Christian majority exists, public life should be rooted in Christianity and it's moral vision. That's America, if you hadn't noticed. And it's moral vision. I'm gonna read this again, because this is striking. Where a Christian majority exists, public life should be rooted in Christianity and it's moral vision, which should be honored by the state and other institutions, both public and private, honored by the state. So no separation of church and state at all, complete integration of religion with the state. At the same time they write, Jews and other religious minorities are to be protected in the observance of their own traditions. In the free government of their communal institutions, governance of their communal institutions, and it all matters pertaining to the rearing and education of their children. What about atheists?  Children, it's okay. In their private lives and in their homes. But children should not be protected from religious coercion, because it's a Christian state. I'll read you afterwards who signed this thing. I mean, this is scary stuff, guys.  This is what he brought out and elevated these intellectuals, these are the ones that inherited, now maybe it would have happened anyway, maybe. Five, Ashton says, this is fascism. Well, let's see, let's read number five. The rule of law, that sounds good. We believe in the rule of law, so do I. By this we mean that citizens and foreigners are alike and both the government and the people must accept and abide by the laws of the nation. Laws based on what?  In America, this means accepting and living in accordance with the Constitution of 1787. Notice and the amendments to it duly enacted statutory law and the great common law inheritance. All agree that the repand improvement of national legal traditions and institutions is as time's necessary, but necessary change must take place through the law. This is how we preserve our national traditions, tradition again, and our nation itself, rioting, looting and other unacceptable public disorders should be swiftly put to an end. Now, most of this I agree with, but note, what's the principle of law? I don't believe in the rule of law when the rules are horrific. I don't believe in the rule of law when the laws clearly violate individual rights. I mean, it was the rule of law that allowed for slavery. Slavery was the law. Is that okay? Should we just don't do anything? You have to go by the law and then, you know, so that underground that got the freed slaves, that's illegal. You're violating the law. If you want to change the law, go through the regular process. None of this, none of this, you know, smuggling slaves out of the South. Sex, all right, we're finally getting to one. Maybe you guys are like, maybe, we'll see. Free enterprise, right? Not free markets, not capitalism, free enterprise. Okay, we'll take it, free enterprise, better than nothing. We believe that an economy based on private property and free enterprise is best suited to promoting the prosperity of the nation and accords with traditions of individual liberty. They believe in individual liberty because of the tradition of individual liberty that are central to the Anglo-American political tradition. What about if you're not part of the Anglo-American? Well, then you don't have to have free enterprise. We reject the socialist principle which supposes that economic activity of the nation can be conducted in accordance with the rational plan dictated by the state.  But the free market cannot be absolute. Uh-oh. Economic policy must serve the general welfare of the nation. Nationalism, tribalism, collectivism, altruism. Today, globalized markets allow hostile foreign powers to spoil America and other countries of their manufacturing capabilities. Weaken them economically and dividing them internally. At the same time, transnational corporations showing little loyalty to any nation demand public life, damage public life by censoring political speech, flooding the country with dangerous and addictive substances and pornography and promoting obsessive destructive personal habits. Oh my God, the enemy destructive personal habits, you guys, maybe listening to your own book show is one of those destructive personal habits that those corporations are inflicting upon you. The prudent national economic policy, note this, should promote free enterprise, but it must also mitigate threats to the national interest, aggressively pursue economic independence from hostile powers, nurture industries crucial to national defense and restore and upgrade manufacturing capabilities critical to the public welfare. Who gets to decide all that? Well, a central planner, of course. Crony capitalism, the selective promotion of corporate profit-making by organs of the state power should be energetically exposed and opposed. How are you gonna do that if you're, the government is gonna nurture industries crucial for national defense, get them a strong upgrade manufacturing capabilities? Isn't that the essence of cronyism? Isn't the only way that can happen is through cronyism? So tariffs, great trade restrictions, great, on showing great, choosing winners and losers, as long as it's in manufacturing, we won't do it in services like programming and stuff like that. All the programming jobs can go overseas. Go programming, please go, you can go to China. We want manufacturing. We wanna be good at what human beings did 100 years ago. That's what we're gonna be good at. We're gonna be good at the stuff we were good at in the past, because that's our tradition. We have traditionally a manufacturing country, so traditionally we should still be a manufacturing company, country. Let's forget about all that high tech. Let's forget about all that software and programming and that's all services. That's no good. We don't want that. I mean, this obsession that people have, this weird kind of obsession over manufacturing, is again, tradition bound. It's a little barbaric and primitive and just weird. I find it really, really weird.   But it's sure to alienate anybody who doesn't happen to be in manufacturing. Wow, it's already, chief, we've been going a long time. Okay, public research. Public research. This is just in the same breath as free enterprise. Now what public research, I did a show on the public research just a little while ago at the government funding of science. Public research, at a time when China is rapidly overtaking American, Western nations and fields, crucial for security and defense. A Cold War type program modeled on DARPA, the Moonshot and SDI is needed to focus large scale public resources on scientific and technological research with military application on restoring and upgrading national manufacturing, manufacturing again capacity and an education in the physical sciences and engineering. I don't know why physical science and engineering today don't necessarily lead to manufacturing. Biotech is not manufacturing. On the other hand, we recognize that most universities, they hate the universities, right? Because the universities are leftists. They don't want them to get the money. But note this, this is super important. On the other hand, we recognize that most universities at this point, partisan and globalist in orientation are vehemently opposed to nationalist and conservative ideas. Such institutions do not deserve taxpayer support. Unless they would rededicate themselves to the national interest. Education policy should serve manifest national needs. In other words, you're not gonna get research grants. You're not gonna get money from the government.  Unless the ideas taught at university are acceptable to the regime, acceptable to the government. Educate policy should manifest national needs. In other words, we will not support universities that are not part of our agenda. That are not teaching our ideas. Now that's the end of free speech. It is the end of liberty. It is the complete control by government. Not only of research, not only of industry, not only of manufacturing, but of ideas. So we've already got no separation between state and church. Now we have no separation between state and ideas. Only good ideas are gonna be promoted by the state. Only good ideas will be subsidized. Bad ideas will not be subsidized by the state. And set up, setized here means big bucks public research. Department of Education has to serve their ideological interests, their ideological demands. Eight, family and children. We believe that the traditional family is the source of society's virtues and deserves greatest support from public policy. Again, free enterprise, but we're gonna subsidize families. The traditional family built around a lifelong bond between a man and a woman and a lifelong bond between parents and children is the foundation of all other achievements of our civilization. That is so ahistorical. That is so BS. The traditional family is the foundation of all achievements of our civilization. Michelangelo, as far as I know, never married. Do not belong to a traditional family was probably gay, we don't know. And yet there's one of the great achievers of our civilization. Leonardo da Vinci, almost certainly gay, had no children, had no family. Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton. Did Isaac Newton have children? I can't remember if he got married. Is the thing that made it possible for Isaac Newton is his children, his family? I could go on and on and on. Really?  And you know, she might have had an affair. Really? So again, the traditional family is the foundation of all achievements of our civilization. Not most, not some, all. Albert Einstein, I don't think he was part of, part of, you know, he had divorced at least twice, once, maybe twice. Did Beethoven have kids? I'm sure Thomas knows that. Beethoven, I don't think Beethoven had any kids. The Mozart, obviously their achievements don't count as achievements of our civilization because obviously they didn't have kids. They didn't have a lifelong bond between a man and a woman, right? So obviously their achievements are to not, or to not.  Chopin, did Chopin have kids? Dude, who go? I don't even know family of who go. See, that's the thing. When I think about great geniuses and great achievement of Western civilization, I don't think about their family. Isn't that a shock, a surprise? Weird, huh? None of them were family men. None of them were family men. Weird. George Washington had no kids. What's wrong with George Washington? I mean, obviously he's not part of our civilization. I go on. That this integration of the family included a marked decline in marriage and childbirth gravely threatens all being unsustainability of democratic nations. Among the causes are an unconstrained individualism. Oh my God. Individualism is the cause for all these civilizational problems. Unconstrained individualism guards children as a burden while encouraging even more radical forms of sexual license and experimentation. Oh my God. As an alternative to the responsibilities of family and congregational life, economic and cultural conditions that foster stable family and congregational life and child raising are priorities of the highest order. All right? None of those geniuses contributed to our civilization. Achievements of our civilization had regular family lives.   Just a little. All right? Immigration. Immigration. Do you think we agree on immigration? Maybe we agree on immigration. Immigration has made an immense contribution to strengthen prosperity of Western nations. Yes. They threw me a bone. But today's pension for uncontrolled and unassimilated immigration has become a source of weakness and instability, not strength and dynamism, threatening internal dissension, and ultimately dissolution of the political economy and community. We note that Western nations have benefited from both liberal and restrictive immigration policies at various times. So the tradition is mixed. The tradition is mixed. We call for much more restrictive policies until these countries summon the wit to establish more balance, productive and assimilationist policies. Restrictive policies may sometimes include a moratorium on immigration, just in case you were worried. They want to ban all immigration. There's no question about that. They're giving you throwing a bone, but they don't believe it. They don't stand by it at all. Finally, race. We believe that all men are created in the image of God, and that public policy should reflect that fact. Huh? So we should... How do you reflect the fact that all people are created in the image of a make-believe? I don't know how you do that. What kind of public policy is reflected in the make-believe? In the fact that we all like the make-believe? No person's worth or loyalties can be judged by the shape of their features, the color of their skin, or the results of a lab test. Huh? All right? The history of racialist ideology and oppression and its ongoing consequences require us to emphasize this truth. We condemn the use of states and private institutions to discriminate and divide us against one another on the basis of race. The cultural sympathies encouraged by a decent nationalism. This is interesting. The cultural sympathies encouraged by a decent nationalism offer a sound basis for conciliation and unity among diverse communities. Cultural sympathies. The nationalism we espouse respect and indeed combines the unique needs of particular minority communities and the common good of the nation as a whole. I mean, really? I doubt it. All right. I want to give you a sense of who signed this. And maybe these are people you know or don't know, but I can tell you a little bit about them. Michael Anton. Michael Anton is famous for Flight 93, which was an essay he wrote in 2016 advocating for everybody to vote for Trump with the idea that the left was so dominant, the world was coming to an end. The only chance civilization had was a very, very small chance that is of rushing the cockpit. An equivalent of rushing the cockpit in the election was voting for Donald Trump. It was an incredibly important essay, very influential. Michael Anton has gone on to be a very influential intellectual on the right. He is a professor at Talesdale College, but way beyond that of great influence. Larry Owen, I think, is the president of Talesdale College. Ambi Athe, I don't know who Amber is. We've got another Talesdale College person. We've got a few people from the Daily Wire, although interestingly enough, really interestingly, Ben Shapiro did not sign this. Ben Shapiro is not one of the signators to this. Do what you will for that. Okay, we've got a bunch of other people, some from the National Review, some Ken Cunichelli from the Election for Inspiracy Initiative, Victor Davis Hansen, who should know better, used to know better, used to be a good guy. I was a big fan of Victor Davis Hansen, still am of his books on military history, but he signed to this. Christopher Mooth, who was much better, used to be a relative free marketer, an anti-nationalist, much better than this. He ran the Institute for Economic Affairs for many years as part of this. Now he's at the Hudson Institute, but he used to be at the Institute of Economic Affairs. Jim DeMint, again, ran, I think, Heritage. I think it was better than this, used to be better than this, no longer. Particularly, DeMuth was better than this. Let's see who else. More Hudson Institute signees that I don't really know. Let's see, Project 20. Foundation from Israel. John Hazzoni, of course, signed this. More national review people from the Federalist. The Federalist is very in line with this. Let's see, Charlie Cook, who was heavily influenced by Iron Man when he was young, and now that he's a little bit less young, he is a real national conservative from Turning Point, USA. Michael Knowles from Daily Wire, a bunch of Daily Wire people here. Let's see anybody else that I would know. From Unhood, from the Klamat Institute. You've got people from the Klamat, you've got people from the Danube Institute. You've got people from New Direction in Poland. I know the people in New Direction, European Center for Law and Justice in France. More Klamat Institute people, more First Things Town Hall. Chris Ruffo from Manhattan Institute. Awful, awful. Disappointing Chris. Let's see, A War College, Daniel Strand, Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel. Let's see anybody else with, yeah, more Klamat Institute. Alright, Edmund Brook Foundation. Alright, what can I say? This is in my view, know who's not signed. Put Ben Shapiro aside, much better than this and is not signed. But know who's not signed. Patrick Deneen has not signed this. Soha Barmari is not signed it. Why did they not sign it? They didn't sign it because this doesn't go far enough. They didn't sign it because this doesn't commit the agenda to enough religion. They didn't sign it because this doesn't commit a complete rethinking of the Constitution. They didn't sign it because this isn't, this isn't, theocratic enough. Yeah, Peter Thiel has become a real national conservative. By the way, Peter Thiel is backing two Senate candidates who have signed up for this agenda. Their signature is not here. But they basically signed up to this agenda and they're backed 100% by Peter Thiel. One is JD Vance in Ohio, who's a national conservative. And the other one is Blake Masters in Arizona. Those two Republicans, in my view, need to lose in November. But those two Republicans are backed almost 100% by Peter Thiel. They are both endorsed by Trump and they are completely part of this agenda. Blake Masters is horrific in his agenda. His agenda is this national conservatism. Which is awful. So Peter Thiel is exactly here. And note that these guys are not the most consistent, not the most radical, not the most extreme. Pink has nothing to do with this. Pink is not here. I don't know why people are talking about Pinko over there. The real extreme people are the Catholic integrationists who want a theocracy. And they didn't even sign this because this is too moderate for them. Spooky stuff, guys. Spooky stuff. Thank you. Thank you.


I kind of want to go to Whole Foods, but I'm too scared to drive down there. Actually, it's not bad, it's when you get in that neighborhood, you know what I mean? Hey y'all. It is Thursday. This week has been really busy. Mainly because of my main job, a lot of people took off this week. So, it's busy. Today's my wash day and I need to actually do a video for y'all. Finally going to review, at first I was just going to review the African Pride TG Cholesterol as a whole and then do a comparison video. But overall, my comparison videos are way more, they get more hits. So, I'm just going to do the comparison video. Alright, I'm going to do that today. If it's like this, like, can you see the sun? Where's the sun at? Where's the sun? Alright y'all, it is Saturday. Your girl's having some stomach, stomach occasion problem. Yeah, that's not even English. I got the bubbleguts. What are you going to do? Okay, I guess I can go. Now, we're going to GameStop because JV wants the, what is it called, baby? Okay. I'm going to turn off my car, wasting out my good gas y'all. The price of gas, honestly, I haven't really been looking, I honestly haven't really, I don't know how much gas costs. I really don't. I just buy it at the same places. You must use my points and stuff because you're going to need gas. So, why am I looking at the price? I just make sure I go to the places where it's affordable.  I'm like, what? Okay, girl. Yeah, let me tell y'all about this child.  I won't tell him everything. Okay.  Like, I didn't even have a drink and you laughing like this? What's so, I don't want to chuckle. What's so funny, JV? And finally, he's like, I think I've already hit puberty. I'm like, oh, okay.  Baby, up here, where a moustache would typically be. And then you plucked it out. You still, let me see. Come here. All right, JV, I'm going to check some stuff for work. I got to work out, y'all. Like, baby, hey, don't make a mess in here. Y'all talk. I'm serious. All right, y'all, this is what I put on. I know you can't really see the bottom, but I know y'all. I look, I'm all about creating memories for my child. So he's going to always remember this, right? Mama dressing up, Mama decorated for the, what is it? The eclipse. Hold on, let me show you how to live room real quick. I just did a little bit of decoration. Okay, and over here, we have the Louis Claiborne and we have Vera Donovan. Yes, I got a playlist. Y'all, look, it's all about building memories. I mean, we ain't going to get this one another 700 years. Are you going to be around, JV? Dora? For that? No, maybe. That was easy, my ex. Maybe? I know that's right, JV. Oh, y'all, it's a mess. I got hot wing sauce. Chop it in my veggies. We got cookie dough. We got wings, veggies. Oh, we got a cake croissants. Yeah. How do you like it, baby? It's hot. It's hot. So JV got crackers, apples and croissants. Oh my God, y'all, it's like one o'clock or two o'clock and it's so dark. You guys, look at this. This is beautiful.


The distance ladder is a set of techniques for determining an object's distance. Each step works for a particular situation in distance range and supports the steps above it. This is how we work our way from Earth to the stars and onto the most distant galaxies. We have just built a solid first rung for our ladder. We can now use the entire diameter of the Earth, 12,756 kilometers, as our baseline for triangulating off the Earth and into the solar system. Here's an overview of the rest of the ladder. Parallax is the second rung in the ladder. Direct measurement doesn't work for figuring out how far away the Sun is. For that, you use an extension of triangulation called parallax. If you hold your finger up in front of your eyes and close one eye at a time, you see a shift in your finger's relative position with respect to distant objects. This is parallax. It can be used to calculate the distance to our solar system neighbors and nearby stars. All you need for this to work is a more distant star that doesn't move when the target object is viewed from different locations. Parallax accuracy goes down as the distance goes up, and it doesn't work at all for stars and galaxies that don't have more distant objects that remain stationary as the Earth-bound observer moves. For those objects, we use a technique called standard candles. Once we know the intrinsic brightness of a star, we can use the simple inverse square rule for the drop-off in the apparent brightness as the object is seen on Earth. Some objects lend themselves to this technique better than others. Some of the most prominent are Cepheid or Cepheid variable stars, emission nebula, and type 1a supernova. These methods can take us across the Milky Way, out to nearby galaxies, and into local supergalaxy clusters. The final rung on the ladder is redshift and the Hubble constant. The most distant galaxies are too far away to see Cepheid stars or supernova explosions. For these, we owe our thanks to Edwin Hubble, who discovered a relationship between the speed that a galaxy is traveling away from us and its distance from us. Based on the evidence from an expanding universe, the faster a galaxy is receding away from us the further away it is. We get the receding speed from the redshift and the light from the galaxy. This method works all the way back to near the Big Bang around 13 billion years ago. We'll be building the cosmic distance ladder rung by rung as we move through how far away is it video book chapters.


This study presents a segmentation model that uses deep residual networks and guided filters to extract buildings from VHR remote sensing imagery, achieving higher accuracy compared to other machine learning and deep learning methods. This article was authored by Yongyang Su, Liang Wu, Zhong Xia, and others.


Hi, and welcome to our session. Let us discuss the following questions. The question says, evaluate the following limits and exercises 1 to 22. Limit of x minus 22 by 7 as x tends to 5. Before solving this question, we should know that if fx is a polynomial function, then limit of fx tends to a is equal to f of a. So limit of fx is the value of f at the point x equals to a. The knowledge of this is the key idea in this question. Let's now begin with the solution. In this question, we have to evaluate limit of x minus 22 by 7 as x tends to 5. Now x minus 22 by 7 is a polynomial function, and we have learned in the key idea that if fx is a polynomial function, then limit of fx is x tends to a is f of a. So by the key idea, limit of x minus 22 by 7 as x tends to 5 is 5 minus 22 by 7. Hence, our required limit is 5 minus 22 by 7. This is our required answer. So this is the key to the section 5, and take care.


What's up everybody Jason from jazby's case breaks calm jazby's big hit express multi-sport edition series five six box case break Random teams number ten just sold out and again guys big hits greater cards six patches that knobs and barrels don't miss out Remember guys just a disclaimer. I've been saying in every break. This is a big risk high risk high reward type of break So since there are only 33 cases produced Most spots will only have a few possibilities as hits And we try to make the combos as even as possible But for some cards that may get pulled early some cars may get pulled early in the print run So just keep that in mind when buying and again if you do go hit list, which there is a really good chance that you will You have a chance to win back some money the hit list promo here guys Where we'll take all the customers that went hit list and we'll give away $50 in break credit through Top 20 get 50 bucks and break credit and the numbers 20 through 25 gets Or 21 through 25 I should say get a jazby hat And here you go guys we're gonna roll the dice this will be for the customer names I bought in this combo teams and the list of case numbers that are still remaining So good luck. Let's roll the dice and it is a six out of three nine times. Good luck one two three four five six seven eight nine Christopher down in Taylor two three four five six seven eight nine Cowboys jazz down to the Royals Patriots Hawks So Christopher with the Cowboys and jazz mark with the Bangles 76 is DJ with the Seahawks Cardinal Celtics Kang with the Phillies Falcons Blazers Jeremy with the Rockies Packers Wizards or Packers Wizards Andrew with the Braves Eagles Darren with the Chargers and Nets Mark with the Reds Washington football team Aaron with the Astros New York Jets John with the Mariners Raptors Vikings accurate the Angels Texans Todd with the 49ers Tigers Pistons Kang with the Rams Mets and Cavs Jeremy with the Giants several Giants Raiders and Bulls Douglas with the Rays and Pelicans Rodney with the Red Sox and Sacramento Kings Christopher with the Bears Bucks Grizzlies Dale with the Marlins Panthers Lake is Tyler Browner with the White Sox Steelers Warriors Taylor with the Dodgers Browns Suns Jake with the Bills Jags Padres Christopher with the Nationals Dolphins and Clippers Brian with the Pirates Lions and Milwaukee Bucks Nick with the Texas Rangers Titans and Yankees Rodney with the Cardinals and T-Wills Ian with the Twins Ravens Knicks Matthew with the A's Broncos Benjamin with the Indians Giants Nuggets Aaron with the Chiefs Thunder Josh with the Maz Orioles Nick with the Blue Jays Colts Hornets and Taylor with the Royals Patriots and Hawks All right guys anybody want to trade I know it's late, but and also guys this was nine times So let's choose the case one two three four five six seven eight 32 is at the top I'm gonna grab that guys. All right guys Try one of close. All right guys. So here you go. Good luck everybody and we have out of one 249 Christian Yellich that is Miami Marlins Edition Christian Yellich So Marlins with that one Where's the Miami Marlins? I don't think so, Brad. I think these are all cards. I don't think if it isn't say specifically in the In the item description just let you know that there's box opportunities. Then I don't think so. I think it's just all cards Dale with this one there you go, man First hit going to you Wow, look at this guys triple autograph John Alway, Terrell Davis and Ed McCaffrey Three out of five all for the Denver Broncos Who has the Broncos? That's Matthew Breister with the A's Broncos combo And there you go, man all aboard Very nice All aboard the big hit express. Whoo. Whoo. It's a back at 10 Pristine 10 Wow, Barry Sanders Pristine 10 Beckett 10 from 2009 Dauntless Classic That is a gold signature out of 26 12 out of 26. This is a beauty Almost a perfect card just the corners were a 95 That is a beaut Detroit Lions It's going to Brian Kim with the Pirates-Lines bucks combo. What's going on here? Okay, there must be a little mistake here unless there's two in one box, but you guys seen it Little typo We'll see what happens there And don't worry guys. We'll replace that if that's the case We got a nine five And it's a luka Donchich 1819 95. Is this going to replace a his that way? Man luka lulu Nine five everything was a nine five at the surface Dallas Mavericks Josh Melton Mavericks Orioles combo and there you go Next one Was there two sell sheet hits? And we got a one of one bow Jackson Look at that Is that california angels edition bill bow Jackson played for the angels? Wow, I did not even know that Okay Um angels edition that's very weird Let's go go to Zachary with the angels texans There you go Wait am I tripping out right here wait there was something in that box did I just grab the wrong box? There's five hits right here. Oh my god. I mostly grabbed the wrong box I'm tripping It's too late for me Larry bird I guess I'm good He played 75 games. Wow, that's crazy 40 out of 49. Oh scared me thought for a second. We actually didn't forget to put a card in here I mostly just grabbed the empty box earlier No, right that makes sense right there wasn't an extra box here And I was tripping tripping out right now I must have left an empty box on here thinking that it was a box. I'm supposed to open Scared me All right Larry bird Bill Jackson Luka Donchich Barry Sanders Triple auto And christian yellow We're good Jesus christ That was crazy All right, then guys. Well, there you go Now let's quickly put you guys in the hit list promo. All right, so everybody There's no randomizers here Luka Donchich is there very nice It's late night guys. I'm not used to coming in at seven So angels here and let me double check did I put everybody else? No, I don't think I tagged everybody else so angels Celtics I don't even announce who that was Celtics was going to go to DJ Mendenhall with that Larry bird I got Miami Detroit Lions I was brian kim and mavericks. I want to say So that should be six right there one two three four Five not missing one. What else am I missing? Oh, is it my missing the Broncos one? Yes, Matthew. All right.  All right, there you go. Should be everybody there Awesome. So you guys so there you go guys This was big hit express number 10 number 11 will be coming up soon after a phoenix football break that is coming up next Appreciate it