Kia ora, Tatu. I'm Courtney Johnston. I'm the director of The Douse. The Douse, for those of you who don't know, is Lower Hutt's Public Art Gallery and Museum. We are based in the centre city out there. We were opened in 1971. We focus on contemporary art and craft. We have a collection of about three and a half-ish thousand objects. We're the really strong focus on contemporary craft, ceramics and jewellery in particular, mostly because we have little budgets and they are cheap. So we're, you know, 15 minutes out of Wellington, but we're very much a regional institution. So that's one of the things that I actually really enjoy about it. The talk that I'm giving today is about a project that we've just embarked upon. I don't have a presentation, but I'm stealing one of Tim O'Reilly's. Tim O'Reilly, the head of O'Reilly Publishing, an advocate in the States for transparency and digital innovation and the things that the web allow us to do as a culture and as a world. His ideas around creating value are kind of something that I have used a lot to shape my thinking about what I'm trying to achieve at The Douse and looking outwards in that. This is an ancient presentation. It's from 2009. He gave it at the Twitter Bootcamp back when Twitter was kind of still a bit of an upstart and new and shiny. And here he's talking, Anadine kind of touched on it yesterday in her social media presentation. He's talking about generosity, I think. He says the secret of social media is that it's not about you, your product or your story. It's about how you can add value to the communities that happen to include you. Not surprisingly, the more value you create for your community, the more value they will create for you. So that's something I think about all the time at The Douse. How are we creating value? Who are we creating value for? Who do we work for? And the two groups that we really work for are our ratepayers who fund us and our artists without whom there is no point for us to exist. So that's kind of the biggest context that I'm operating in, this idea of creating value. This context down for this particular project is that some funding became available. So maybe before I went out to The Douse, I was running a web company called Boosty Media and before that I was at National Library. I came from a really, I was a board member of NDF, I came from a really digital background and I think when I went to The Douse, everyone expected that the first thing that I would do would be to start a whole bunch of digital initiatives. And I think maybe the only new digital thing that we've done is set up an Instagram account and I didn't even do that. When I look at our audiences, our collection, our city and our place in the country, digital has actually ended up being quite low on my level of priorities when it comes to diverting an existing operating budget into new projects. So when a new piece of funding came up that allowed me to test some ideas around what I'd like us to do digitally, but also this idea around creating value, I kind of jumped on it. So in 1992, this is a little bit of a lesson in the history of the craft sector. The Craft Council got dissolved and the Craft Council sat alongside the Arts Council. New Zealand craft scene in the 70s and 80s was incredibly vibrant and innovative and outward focused. Potters were over in Japan and people were being brought over here and they were doing amazing things and the Craft Council kind of underpinned all of that. When they got dissolved, it happened in kind of a hurry. The archives came to the Dowson. We're still dealing with that legacy because we don't have a librarian. And the kind of the oomph went out of the sector. So a trust was formed, Ngataunga Heinei iwi iwi, who tried to continue the work of the Craft Council in the terms of building the profile and therefore the market and exhibition opportunities for craft artists. As with many of these organisations, the people who set it up in 1992 were senior in the field at the time and now they're very senior. So they were looking to wind up the trust and disperse its assets. So they sent out an expression of interest around that. And they had a small number of assets. They had a piece of taonga by Rani Kepa, which has come into the Dowson Collection. They had some filing cabinets full of stuff, which have, I think, gone into the tumble, thank God. They had a website that was built in the early 2000s on the back of a major fundraising campaign and hadn't been updated since 2006. And they had this much money. $13,000. And so I responded to the EOI and I said, I don't want the filing cabinets. We're not equipped to deal with those we'd love to house. Rani Kepa, that makes a lot of sense. And then I said, I know you want your website to be looked after and redeveloped and taken on by someone else, but we're not going to do that. But would you like to give me $13,000 to do something else with entirely? And they were really open-minded and receptive to that and that's how we've ended up launching this summer's Wikipedia project. So the point of the project is to write 100 biographies of New Zealand craft artists and load them onto Wikipedia. The more we explore this, the more we realise we're going to end up researching and documenting a lot of other things like major exhibitions, major publications, critics and curators who worked in the area. I really didn't I didn't want to take on their website because I couldn't commit to the ongoing care of it. We could have spent $13,000 updating it and replenishing the content but I couldn't commit to the ongoing upkeep. Wikipedia is not only the place where we're horribly underrepresented in terms of our history but it's also a place where I can in good conscience hand over to the community and say you help us keep this up to date rather than just creating another problem that would be perpetuating the one that the trust had already found themselves in. $13,000 in the context of what the DALS spends, that for us is about how much we invest in a major exhibition. So this is actually quite a chunky bit of funding from our perspective and I've split it up I'm going to do this all openly so we'll be publishing the budget and how we're spending it. The bulk of it is being used to employ two post-grad students or two recent grads who will be doing the research and doing the writing. I've put aside a little bit of money for them to go to conferences and training and present on the project. A little bit of money to digitise some of the key resources that aren't online that we need in order to write these entries and keep them on Wikipedia with proper references and taking a little bit of advice from Digital New Zealand will probably be putting those into the shared repository and then I've taken $1,000 for Overhead basically a little a little bit of padding for all the stuff that we'll be putting into the project ourselves. So the plan is for 100 bios and at the moment progress so far if you want to take on quite a gnarly and weird bit of community management try to make a list of the 100 most important any things in an area that people are really, really passionate about I would recommend that for a fun undertaking so we've actually done quite a good job of that and it's been a really increased my knowledge hugely so we're there as well as having the trust review that list will also be sending it out to a group of external curators ensuring it in that way and it's not about saying these people are better than other people a lot of it is about these people who have had long careers which are documented well which will lend themselves well to this kind of project without the documentation we can't do the project I've got one intern on board, she started last week and another person who I'm eyeing up and we'll talk to when I get back to work tomorrow and Mackenzie and I our intern who's on board came along to Mike and Stuart's workshop on Monday and kind of got the nitty-gritty on what this is actually going to be like I have quite a lot of nervousness around this project and especially launching to people who don't necessarily who aren't existing Wikipedia editors into it because my reading of the Wikipedia culture is that it's kind of horrible that's one of my major nervousness about this project and I've reflected on this a lot inside museums we're spending so much time at the moment trying to meet our communities on their turf I'd like to walk across the bridge to them to not impose our values but to ask what do you value and how do you like to do things and my reading of it is that the Wikipedia community does not work like that at all and they're kind of scary like the first bit of advice we got given in the workshop was don't use your real name which you know to me that's actually not good enough so kind of an added layer of what I'm trying to achieve with this project now is maybe building up enough confidence in the sector that we don't feel like that that we've got the support that I don't open up a Wikipedia account and then really worry about contributing any of my knowledge to this worldwide encyclopedia because I'm afraid that someone's going to just yell at me and make me cry at my laptop which is a bit sad yeah that's alright I keep on adding things to it but for me the project's all about making each one of these dollars work like really really work and when you're in a smaller organisation you probably I think start thinking about this so the value that I'm hoping to create here and the reason that I have chosen to invest this bit of money in this project and not in digitising our collection which is not online at the moment I think we have about 100 items in the NZ Museum's website so apart from that we have no collection information online and it's a big gap and I think about it a lot but I've prioritised this instead because I think it'll create a bunch of different ways. It's going to raise the profile of craft artists someone said to me in the workshop why don't you not worry about Wikipedia if you're worried that you're going to spend all this time writing these entries and then people are just going to come and delete them and you're not going to have any say why don't you just start your own website and I thought wow that sounds appealing and easy and then I thought no that's not actually going to achieve it because we need to put the information where the people are we need to put it where Google first. So raising the profile of our craft artists and our craft history by filling Wikipedia up with a bunch of information that it's missing there's nowhere in New Zealand where you can go and study the history of New Zealand craft you know you can't go and sign up to an art history course and learn about what's happened in the last 50 years in this area which is actually really vibrant and interesting and it makes you know ongoing I'm going to have a recruitment problem as I try to bring in new curators who can deal with the collection that's primarily made up of object art so one of the bits of value that we're creating out of this project is that we'll have two young and enthusiastic arts professionals who suddenly have a whole new body of knowledge that there is pretty much no other way for them to access and that by also digitising these key bits of material we're putting some more of that history online. We're going to talk to all these artists or there are states about the project that we're doing which is an opportunity both to reintroduce the daus to them if they're artists that we've fallen out of contact with but also to talk to them about what's happening online. I mean there are a number of states we'll be dealing with there are a number of older artists we'll be dealing with and then there are a number of people who are fluent in the web so it's a real spectrum and it's an opportunity for us to do a little bit of education in this area. It allows us to reaffirm our position as arguably arguably is a word that we use a lot in the moment in this culture right? So arguably I think New Zealand's leading contemporary craft institution and this is an opportunity for us to kind of and for me to nail someone's clipping so that means I must need to wind up soon. Nail our colours to the mast in that area and it really allows us to enrich our collection knowledge the future of the project for me it's really not about just stopping with these 100 entries. We're going to document it and document the process, what we learnt, what happened how we spent the money and then we'll release all of this as we go. I would love to see other people going out and pitching for funding or reallocating a bit of what they're doing and doing 25 architects or 50 colonial artists or musicians or composers or whatever it is that we're missing in this area and helping that out. I'd quite like us to continue the project ourselves in different areas. Hopefully it will be successful and it will become a good foundation for making future pictures and then in a couple of years time when I do kind of managed to massage my budget into a place where we can get our collection up online I'll be looking to pull all this information back from Wikipedia and display it alongside our collection items without creating a whole bunch of biographical entries that we then have to keep up to date every time someone moves or dies or gets a new award or all of the things that happen all the time when you're trying to look after artist's reputations. So that's the project we'll have the first blog post up on the DALS website by the end of this week and we should have the first bios up before Christmas Do I have time for questions? Oh I really belted through that Sorry, I was aware that I was going at a super radio pace but I was working off these so there you go Any questions? I know it's a stunning project, I wouldn't have any questions either Yeah So the question is do I have any concerns about using the visual side Not about I mean it's not about necessarily communicating the art works so much as it is putting the information about the artists and their careers online or the big stumbling block around the way that Wikipedia treats images and this is something that I haven't made my mind up about yet when you load up an image into Wikipedia or Wikipedia Commons you have to give up everything and as a collecting institution and an institution that works with artists every single day we work with them around their IP and their copyright and I actually don't know if I'm comfortable going to an artist and saying we'd really love to have images of your work to illustrate this entry but in order to do that you have to give up everything that's it, I think that's a big ask and I think it could potentially be extremely alienating when we go to artists and say hey this thing that you don't really know anything about we want to give them some of your stuff and you're not going to have any say anymore Potentially I'll just put that into the too hard basket for this iteration and tackle it later on realistically what I'll do is start with the friendlies the people who we have existing really good relationships with who I know use the internet frequently themselves and we'll be most open to this idea and start there is an enormous gap in this culture between the knowledge that we have about copyright and about what audiences are trying to do and the knowledge that artists have about their rights and what the opportunities might be and I don't know how we fix that because artists don't do professional development the way that we do once you leave art school you're doing art you're not going along to workshops and courses and learning this kind of career stuff so maybe Bronwyn has some fascinating insights but I'm not going to dump it on you because that's not fair that's a long winded answer to quite a short question but I hope it kind of gets me to where you were at have I spoken to Stuart? Yes I have spoken extensively to Stuart and so for the benefit of the recording because we're meant to be using a microphone Bronwyn's point is around the dearth of online information particularly about younger artists and critical reviews and things like that and Wikipedia has very strict rules around what they believe to be reputable quotable material and one of the problems that we have to deal with in this project is that it's entirely likely that Wikipedia will look at our entries and say you have a massive conflict of interest and we're going to delete these all and in the workshop on Wikipedia on Monday I threw a complete speck about this like a total speck because I'm like if you cut us out there is such a small group of people in New Zealand who have the knowledge who are equipped to make this contribution and if you strike us out because we're somehow complicit or not objective by virtue of the fact that we know this stuff and work in the sector then it's all just kind of fucked you know like it's just it's not going to happen and this is what I mean about banging my head against the Wikipedia culture and also you know if Wikipedia is not going to accept exhibition catalogs as a reputable source because they're somehow biased on objective it's like well we don't have anything else but I guess my overall philosophy is either you give up and you don't do anything or you try to change it so we'll try to change it and if that doesn't work then I'll find something else to do but I don't know like do we set up a dummy website and publish material that doesn't appear to come from any of us so that we can cite it seems counterintuitive to me too but I don't know, I'm still figuring it out I'm sure you've thought that presumably you're going to be recording and building on the people that you interview? No Does that would provide another R-Caster? Yeah it would, I'm going to point at that number again and it's just not there are actually a lot of really great oral history projects that have been done with craft artists and Te Papa's archive Yeah it would be so lovely I completely agree with you I'm really talking about not lowest common denominator but just like this is building blocks stuff that we're really really lacking in this area and that will be icing to mix my metaphors up What was the money out there? But as a council it's probably hard for you to do that but the friends at the desk might be able to do that That's entirely possible So this is a really interesting thing that I've like a little philosophical thing that I've come up against since coming into this role Katrina and I Katrina's my coms manager and she's here critiquing my performance Really the crowd from the front row We go along to funding presentations occasionally and from people who are funding projects and we end up sitting between people who run emergency housing for women who are trying to escape violent partners and people who are working with elderly people trying to keep them in their own homes and I kind of sit there and I go I'm running an art museum I don't want to compete with you for that funding but at the same time Yes Creative Communities funding I don't think I sit on Creative Communities panel for Hutt City Council and I don't think we would be eligible I'm not entirely sure but I wouldn't sign it off as a person on the panel if it wasn't a big conflict of interest anyway We have a friends group and we have a foundation and we do occasionally use both of those to apply for funding that we otherwise because we're a council unit wouldn't be able to go for so I definitely am hoping that a successful project I would like to go to CNZ for funding around this actually I'd like to see them widen what they're doing in the digital space Brian Question about relationships and connections so if you're putting this stuff on here do you see a relationship between that being and Digital New Zealand what are your ideas What are your ideas link data is really not my area of expertise at all I would hope that it would be useful. I used to have a dream when I was at Digital New Zealand that those authorities would end up making these magical webpages where you would pull from Wikipedia so I could go there and I could type in Doreen Bloomheart and I'd get pictures from here of Wikipedia bio from there I would hope that it does become an authoritative source that people can use and reuse and reuse I mean it's one of the good things about Wikipedia being so trenchant about copyright and accessibility and reusability is that anyone will be able to take this content and use it on their collection website or whatever else they want to use it for so if Digital New Zealand wants to scrape it more power to them Hi Lisa I hope so I genuinely hope so I'm going to get off but I'm trying really hard not to be possessive about this idea you really want to hold a passion project close to you if this is successful then I would hope that other people take it on and do it better than we do better and faster and cheaper or more money or whatever but it is my turn to step up and do something for the sector so that's what we're trying to do thank you


I know, this club built throughout the players, throughout the fans, you know, there's a big difference with a lot of clubs in Australia that the fans play a big part, you know, they come in big numbers, home games, you know, that's why I say the most games that I enjoy when I was playing at home, you know, because when I have to play for four or five thousand people, you know, the joy is different, you know, I still know you have to do the job, you have to be professional, but you cannot lie, you know, players from other clubs say, oh, waiting to come to Perthic Stadium to play here, you know, that's a big compliment to the fans what they achieve in the short period of time to gain so many fans and members, it's a great job to the people from this community.  This is very rare in football, you know, that your teammates caring about you like, oh, where can you find a house or apartment or where can we help, you know, so this is something special about this playing group. These guys were unbelievable, you know, they always make it easy for me to adapt to a totally different country, so I will miss the most, is the boys here, you know, and of course, when you play at Vertec, it's a wonderful feeling, you know, so, but this is something I see the boys daily, you know, it's not easy to come daily in and see them all the time, so it's good when you have a great time. I mean, you know, from day one I came in, because of him I came to this club, you know, I didn't know much about this club.  We worked very good together two years, you know, and respect for him as a man as well, you know, as a leader from this team.


All right, this one comes from someone named A Nani Moose. You have to be anonymous to ask this question. Nobody wants, nobody wants you to know that they asked this question. You know, they don't want to be caught.  Okay, well, here's the question that Anonymous asks. Can anyone give me options on how to turn off Microsoft Authenticator for Office 365? I have multiple students. Okay, so this is, I'm assuming teams in education and I don't want them to install the Authenticator app on their phone. So maybe we should say we should not answer this on their grounds that we could, most of us could lose our MVP status by telling them how to do to violate their security. One, I wouldn't do it. No offense, you're telling us you're dealing with students. Students are not always the most reliable, safety conscious or anything like that. I mean, just saying. So, and if it's college students, there's a whole other subset of things that could go on in that kind of a setting. So I feel like it would be a bad idea. Is it something that you can do if you're using conditional access policies? Yes, you can have groups of people, individual users that you can put in an exception, but would I do this? Absolutely not. Well, one other thing, again, depending on the age, if it's college students, I mean, I'd be surprised that they don't already have Authenticator on there because of other applications and systems. And hopefully, I didn't even say younger kids with phones. I'm reading this as I don't want to have to ask students to install another application and go through that, want to be as streamlined as possible. But when you're talking about the security of and the risk of not having multi-factor authentication in place, it's better to teach them what it is, why and to use it than to remove it because it's easier. Yeah, most people are using MFA for other things. They're banks, even gaming. Gaming requires MFA at this point. So I put a link to the, there's a way to change it. Instead of using the Authenticator download, you can switch it to text or you can switch it to the number that pops up. So instead of using the Authenticator download, just simply change the method that they're doing MFA by. And then if it's just like an SMS message or something, then that way they won't have to download that application. Yeah, because if it's the supportability of another app on their personal phones, then do the text method, right? I mean, everybody has as text. So I would look at that option before I do the turnoff thing at all. Christian's like, I already do 90% of the work for you guys. If you could do the 1% for me, that'd be great. Well, I think when I almost made the comment earlier, it says, yeah, Christian, I just add the link. And I said, talking about links makes such awesome video. Thank you. May I have another?


Session 32 on Quality Control and Improvement with Minitabh and Professor Indrajit Mukherjee from Shailesh J. Mehta School of Management at Bombay. So, we are discussing in the last session about measurement system analysis and within that we have just stratified into two parts, one is for accuracy and one is for precision. So, we are discussing about accuracy and within accuracy what we have discussed is basically bias definition and linearity and stability that is the mu part that we are talking over here. So, this is the mu parts which is which gets affected. So, mean of the observations are if there is an instrumental bias it will it will deviate the actual observations somewhat and the mean will change the overall observation mean will change. So, in this case we do not want any basically biasness in the instrument there should not be any bias in the instrument like that. So, measurement of this bias can be in different way what we do is that one is known as basic bias that is what is the average observation and how far it is from the reference point like that ok. When I have only one reference information like that one part one instrument and one reference that I am measuring several times and we get the bias information like that ok. But sometimes what we are interested into the what we what we intend to do is that throughout the observation throughout the measurement range observation how much is the bias at each and every location like that because the instrument may be measuring different parts based on the process variability because the parts will be generated at different range like that. So, we do not expect that every parts will be in a specific zone like that. So, instrument should be flexible to measure throughout the throughout the tolerance zone of the of the parts like that ok. So, what is expected is that throughout the operating range the instrument should be able to measure accurately. So, bias let us say varnier caliper. So, bias at the any at the observation close to 0 should have minimum bias also and the observation at a high range of high range of measurement also should be having minimum bias or near to 0 like that. So, throughout the operating range of the instrument the bias should be minimal like that. So, that is known as linearity when we are talking about bias throughout the operating range of the instrument and that is what we consider as process variability total process variability and that should be having bias should be negligible like that. So, we then only the instrument is suitable like that and stability study what we have mentioned is that stability is with respect to time. So, the instrument is same and the sample is also same, but sample reading of the samples that we are getting at different time points in morning and evening we are going to say or at different time points throughout for a specific time period longitudinal study when we are doing like that. So, in that case what is expected is that every time it should measure the same same biasness should be same. So, that should not be any shift in the measurements that we are observing. So, that is measured by stability using control chart techniques that we are not discussing about stability. So, bias and linearity study we have immediate have an options to see the bias and linearity. So, in that case what we have done is that we have taken a specific example and we are doing that and we will continue from there. So, the examples that we have taken is that one simple example that we have taken one part measurement is given and master specimen observed that that is the master's value of the master's samples that is collected over here throughout the operating range. So, it can be from meteorology labs or tool rooms like that we have a master piece that we are measuring with this instrument like that. So, in this case so, how many parts are there in C 1 column like that. So, we can we can just see this one. So, number of observations is part bias over here. So, there are 5 parts over here and 5 will have different different specimen values like that. So, one so, the parts that we have taken over here. So, in this case we have parts which has a specification of 2 over here. So, that the first part is having a value of 2 basically the master value is 2 around and this is the operator who has measured that one. So, actual value is 2 or reference value is 2 and this is the observed value like that observer keeps on changing because even if I do not tell the operator what is the measurement of the parts that I have given him. So, in that case he will measure the parts and he will tell me what is the true values of that what he can measure using the instrument. So, we have to select the operator also very skilled operator over here. We cannot take the measurements let us say you are an engineer and you are trying to measure that one that is not feasible that way we do not do gauge and any measurement system analysis. It has to be done by skilled operator who knows the instrument who can handle the instrument like that those people will do the measurement system analysis ok. We will only record and we will only analyze and try to figure out whether the instrument needs calibration needs to go to metrology lab for further rectification like that or not that only we can we can just say about the instrument ok. So, and they will take care of the instrument what is going wrong we have to identify what is going wrong in the instrument then they will take care of that and they will send us either the old one after repairing or what you have to do is that they will change the instrument altogether they will say that this is not possible to rectify in that case you can use a new instrument like that. So, and due to warranty or some at a certain given time point we have to change the instrument also in production flow ok. So, that that is natural. So, in this case so, here we have five different parts and five different parts are different measurements. So, it varies from 2 to 10 and these are the observations that we are having over here these are the observations that we are having. So, simultaneously I want to see what is the bias at each of the operating zone that is what is the bias as reference value of 2, reference value of 4, reference value of 6 like this. And we want to see that overall biasness whether it is overall bias in the instrument whether it is throughout the operating range whether it is ok or not. So, for that what we have done is that statistics we have gone to quality tools and in that case gate studies and gate studies linearity and bias over here. So, then we have given the part bias over here master over here and response over here and here there is option of process variability over here. So, that I am not giving at present. So, and then how do I method of estimating standard deviation over here. So, this will be used for a t statistics that will be used for p value calculations. So, what I am doing is ok over here. So, what do you observe over here is the results that you are observing over here. So, in this case what happens this we have discussed earlier also. So, in this case what do you see is that these are the part observation at reference value of 2, these are the 5 observations that we have taken and the red points that you are seeing over here is the average value over here. So, bias average bias is given over here. So, out of this 4 measurement what is the average observation and what is the reference value that will give you the bias over here. So, bias is in y axis and reference value is in x axis. So, we can regress bias with reference value over here and that regression equation is fitted over here with the constant value of the intercept that is given over here, slope is given over here as minus 0.13167 and slope is coming out to be significant that that test statistics is used over here, hypothesis testing is done for the regression and in this case what is observed is a slope is significant. So, we do not want slope to be significant in a linearity studies like that. If that is so, that means, there is something going wrong at different operating range bias are drastically changing like that. So, this slope should be insignificant then only the instrument is ok in linearity aspects like that. So, but the r square fit that you are seeing over here r square value is about 0.71 like that and then we have a values over here what is the reference value and corresponding what is the bias whether add 2 reference value whether it is significant or not. So, it is significant at 2 and 4 and 6 it is not significant, but 8 and 10 it is significant. So, it is measuring at the lower range and higher range which is significantly bias is significantly having a statistical such skill importance over here that means, statistically significant basically. So, at the at the reference value of 2 and 8 and so, lower range it is having a high bias or significant bias and the higher range also it is measuring, but in the middle range what we are observing there is no as such bias is not so, significant over here. So, although overall the slope is linearity is significant over here that is because of at the lower range bias is high and the higher range also bias is high at the lower range what we are seeing a positive bias is reference over here and the lower range and the higher range higher range of observation what we are getting is that negative bias is observed over here. So, this is the basic interpretation. So, whenever there is a bias when bias is changing in the operating range we need to correct that one and slope should not be significant that is the overall interpretation that we can make out of this ok. Now, sometimes what happens is that they they calculate say linearity index also they calculate linearity index also over here. So, what you have to do is that quality tools over here you go to guess studies over here and you go to linearity over here only thing is that process variability you have to mention over here based on which this linearity values will be calculated and based on that whether to accept the instrument or not to accept the instrument that you have to do ok. This is mentioned as 6 multiplied by historic standard deviation of the of the process like that. So, what we can do is that this is response taken from the process only that means the range of values is taken from the process we can say that this is the part variation. So, what we can do is that we can just see what is the variability over here standard deviation of this. So, we can just take that one in statistics what we will do is that we do not want all information over here we need only the standard deviation information. So, we will eliminate all other options over here and then we will click ok and we will let us try to see that whether this information can be used it is around 6.7 6.775 let us say 6.75 over here. So, this is 6.75. So, in this case I can use the calculator. So, 6.75 over here if you multiply it with you have to multiply with 6 over here. So, this is around 40.5 this is around 40.5. So, what we will do is that here we will go to quality tools and then get studies and linearity and bias. So, in this process variability we will we will write 40.5 what we have got over here. So, in this case and in the options what we do is sample standard deviation. So, that is ok. So, I will click ok over here. So, when you do this you will get a different percentage linearity over here. So, we need to have calculates percentage linearity over here ok. So, based on this slope over here slope value multiplied by process variability that will give me a linearity percentage over linearity values over here that is mentioned at 5.33 over here and we can convert the percentage linearity and again multiplied by. So, again multiplied by process variability. So, one is slope divided by process variability and another is multiplication. So, overall it will be around 13.2. So, the standard that is followed in industry is that mostly if it is less than 30 percent like that they can they can, but it varies from industry to industry I am not saying there is specific like that ok. Somebody can say 10 percent we will allow linearity 10 percent more than that we will not allow, but overall what we see is that even if we do not go by this we see whether the slope is significant or not like that. Not sometimes statistical statistical significance does not imply it is very high highly significant means practically it may not be so much means so much critical like that, but that is why we are using process variability measures over here and we are finding out the percentage how much is the linearity or or this shift deviation with respect to the process deviation like that with respect to the process deviation like that. So, these measures can be taken based on the industry standards what you are following in your industry. So, so that way we can we can express linearity over here ok, but when we are doing this study what we are getting is that one linearity percentage we need to have also reports like that. So, and there can be criteria for different industries. So, somebody can take 10 percent somebody can say anything less than 30 is ok, but there needs to be some corrections over here. So, percentage linearity is a concern whenever it is more than 30 percent it is a concern whenever it is more than 30 percent that means it is highly significant. So, in that case we have to take some measure because bias is changing drastically over here in the operating range, but that information where it is changing we will get this information over here ok. So, this is one aspects of when we are talking about mean and that aspects we are covering over here and, but there can be also impact on variability that means impact on variability whether the now this is bias we are talking about the bias aspects of that or accuracy part of that we we have to shift to now variance we have to shift the variance information whether the variance of the instrument is quite large or not that we have to see.  Here we are more concerned about this sigma measurement over here. So, we are concerned about this sigma over here and variation variation due to the measurement system over here can be contributed by two two aspects over here, one is known as repeatability of the instrument and one is known as reproducibility of the instrument over here. What is repeatability if you are measuring it same parts like that there will be some variation in the measurements like that. So, same operator is measuring repeated times like that and the instrument will have some variations like that that will contribute to the repeatability aspects of that that is known as error aspects of that in the instrument. So, that is repeatability. So, this is basically common common variability everywhere there is this types of variation will happen because same instrument if I am doing its second time sometimes readings may somewhat deviates in that and that variability that amounts to that amount of variability is represented by this measure which is known as repeatability over here ok. And what is reproducibility because we are measuring by because in in in short flow what happens is that there are different operators. So, there are different operators over here. So, and in every shift there can be a different operator. So, what is expected is that all the operator should measure the measure the same parts with same accuracy like that that does not happen operator to operator variation can happen. So, operator may measure somewhere over here, operator B is measuring somewhere over here, operator C is measuring somewhere over here. So, overall mean of location over here for operator A is different from the second one and third one like that. So, this this variation that is happening due to operator is known as reproducibility. So, this is reproducibility and this is known as repeatability like that. So, a specific kind of study is recommended over here which is known as gauge R and R study which is the repeatability and reproducibly measure and that we have to. So, in this case what happens is that in this study what happens is that I have a measuring instrument which is which is the same instrument that I am doing and there will be different parts like in linearity study what we have taken throughout the operating range we will select the parts like that and then there will be different operators. So, here we are having a change rather than linearity where single operator was used here there are multiple operators over here. So, in this case they these are three operators that is selected over here and based on that we will do the study. And this study will be done by using we can use two types of methods over here. I will discuss only one method which is known as two way analysis of variance method which we have already studied like that ok. So, this is two way analysis of variance method that we will explain over here and the way study is conducted over here that we will explain and how to analyze the data that we will explain and what is to be seen that is to be that is will be elaborated in this in this in this session over here ok. So, here what you have to do is that they have selected different parts like that in the operating range. So, this is the 10 parts that is selected over here and these are the observations for a specific part from a specific operators like that. So, this is basically repeatability of the observations that we are happening. So, same sample is measured by the same operator several times over here this is three times that is measured n equals to 3 over here. So, this is nothing, but we can think about repeated measurements what we are taking over here ok. So, similarly operator 2 will measure the same parts part 1 like that and the third operator will also measure the same parts like that. Now, this total experiment that you are seeing over here is randomized over here and the operator does not know which part he is measuring basically which part he is measuring. So, part number will be randomly generated over here and it will be given to some operator and measurements will be taken like that. So, this is randomization is ensured so that no biasness no there is no bias as far as operator is concerned like that. So, operator does not know next part what is the measurement of that which part it is coming like that. So, randomly we will generate and this data will be generated like that. So, 10 multiplied by 30 30 multiplied by 3 is 90 observations we have. So, it is like design of experiment. So, what is the factor over here? So, one is the parts that is the one one aspects 1 to 10 number of parts over here and there are three different operators. So, operators operator 1 operator 2 so, level 3. So, this is at level 3 and there are 10 parts over here. So, this is part and operator that is that is the factor that we have considered over here. So, it will be a two way analysis of variance that we have already studied like that. So, we will fit this data into MINITAB and the results we will just try to see over here. So, these parts that we have selected is within the process variability like that. So, this is we can think of that overall process variation is covered over here. So, generally when parts are selected that will be from from the process and it covers more or less the outcome of the process like that CTQ outcomes like that. So, we want to ensure that that part variation will be there because intentionally we have selected different parts like that which is having different measurements like that. We cannot select parts which are very similar in observations like that. So, one to 10 parts are at different range like that and there is some difference between the observations. So, they are basically unique observations that we are having over here. So, this covers the overall variation tolerance zone of the CTQ basically what we are covering over here. So, this is taken from the process these 10 parts will be selected like that this data will be fit into MINITAB and then we have to see what is to be done. So, when this is the data set and it is taken from Montgomery's book Introduction to Statistical Quality Control is another another very good books that you can and the way that we are doing over here is basically following a guideline that is measurement system analysis reference manual which is developed by Chrysler for General Motors Supply Quality Equipment Task Force over here. So, this is AIG standard AIG standards that we are following and there are manuals you can you can see manuals of AIG for measurement system analysis and we are going by the manual and we will somewhat deviate if required otherwise more or less what manual says we are going by that and MINITAB also does what is given in the manual basically ok. So, and also you can see QS 9000 that is earlier earlier when people quality systems in automobile industries like that that is the certification like ISO 9000 certification there is a QS certification which is changed recently. So, anyway anyway so, then that there you can get the standards of measurement system analysis. So, two way analysis you already understand. So, we are doing this experiment experiment setup I have told parts are different operators are different and we are taking repeated observations. So, why we are doing repeated observation because we will go by the average value we will be more accurate more number of. So, we have taken n equals to 3 over here if we have increased this one more accuracy we can we can assure out of the study. So, this is basically design of experiments what we are doing and this is two factor experimentation that we are doing over here. So, this measurements is there in my MINITAB file and that is given at the at the last part of this. So, this part Montgomery operator Montgomery and measurement Montgomery because this is a Montgomery's example. So, I have taken from there. So, what I am doing is that these are the three observations 90 observations is given over here. So, all these 90 observations we are just going to analyze using Gage RNA study like that whenever you have fit the data what happens is that then you have to go to quality tools and then you have to go to Gage studies and then you have to take Gage RNA study crossed you have to see this one that we are selecting this one cross studies over here. So, in this case what will happen is that it will it will ask for this where is the parts measurement where is the operator measurements like that. So, you have to mention which column is what. So, part is given in this one operator is given in basically operator is given in this second one. So, this is this is not the correct one. So, we have selected this is part over here this is and the measurement that we have taken at the end this is the measurement of Montgomery that we have taken over here. And our analysis we have clicked not this one we are analyzing this one. So, in this Gage information you have to provide all details over here and in options what you have to do is that the standard deviation study variation is taken as 6 over here. So, and then what you can do is that you can later on we will come back to this historic standard deviation. So, that needs to be calculated and put over here so that we can also calculate study variability like that. So, we will not do it as at this time point. So, in this case what we will do is that we will click ok over here whenever we have clicked ok what will happen is that you will get. So, we will make an excel we will open an excel sheet over here so that we understand and see it clearly what are the results. So, two way analysis variance is prepared over here with interactions that minute I have automatically does it for you and it indicates some important things over here. So, what we will do is that we will just click this one and we will copy paste the information that is given over here. So, I am copying this as a picture and I will paste it in excel sheet so that it is visible for everyone. So, what you see is that source of variation. So, part to part variation. So, part is one of the factor. So, in this case that is significant and it is expected that part variability is will be part to parts are different. So, this will be significant we are not bothered about this one. We are bothered about the second part which is operator to operator variation that whether this factor is significant or not that means when operator A is measuring easy measuring differently as compared to operator B and C like that. Now, what you observe over here in the analysis or what it signifies is that operator is basically significantly different because p value is less than 0.05 over here. So, operator to operator measurements are differing over here then is there any interaction between part and operator over here that is also significant over here that means operator A measures part A differently, but that same operator measures part 2 differently that means the method there is there is some interaction over here. So, depending on the part measurements also comes depending on the part. So, operator measures part based on the there is a dependency between parts and operator. So, there is a interaction between part and operator that is also not required whenever it is less than 0.05 we are concerned about that, but if it is more than 0.05 that is a favorable situation. Similarly, operator p value is more than 0.05 is a favorable situation. So, we want part variation to be significant, but these two operator variation and interaction effect to be not significant like that. So, that is expected, but that is not so over here. So, let us see the next part of that. So, next what we have is this variance variance component and percentage contribution over here. So, this calculation we have to explain by using a diagram over. So, this is the PPT we have gone. So, this is the observation that you see the first part over here. So, this is the first part that you see p value of parts is significant and that that is expected, but these two are significant that means we are concerned about this, but this is statistical significance over here. So, and this value is what you see repeatability or error we can think of error over here that measure is basically repeatability that means that is the measure of repeatability and mean square of this is considered as repeatability over here. So, when when I say source of variation that MINITAB provides in the variance component that you will see the next result what it shows. So, in this case repeatability is nothing, but this mean square is represented over here. So, this is same as this one what you see over here is same as this one over here repeatability. Similarly, we can calculate that what is the operator contribution of this source of variation over here. So, this is the operator contribution of this. So, in this case the formula is given. So, you have to take mean square of operator which is given as this one and then we have to calculate mean square of interaction between operators and parts like that. So, this is the operator part interaction. So, you subtract this from this and divide it by a multiplied by n. So, what is a is the number of parts and number of replicates over here number of parts is 10 over here and the number of replicates is basically 3 over here that we are taking. So, if you do that one what you will get is that you will get operator variation over here which is the variance component over here. Similarly, there are formulas to calculate reproducibility and interaction part of this and part to part variations also you can calculate and overall total variation is given as 50.0963.  Now, summation of this, this, this, this and this and this part variability. So, part variability is expected to be very high. So, this is expected because parts are different. So, most of the variation contributed. So, in this study most of the variation is contributed due to change in parts. So, this is expected over here and then percentage of that we can also calculate. So, if I convert this 48 out of 50 this is around 96. Similarly, we can calculate the percentage contribution over here and the overall contribution will be 100 percent over here. So, the overall is 50. So, with respect to 50 what is coming we have we are just mentioning over here. So, whenever we have mentioned this, this percentage contribution percentage contribution is an important measure to accept or reject the instrument like that. So, generally what is taken is that less than 9 to 10 percent we can think of. So, standard says 9 to 10 percent. So, I have just written 10 percent over here it depends from industry to industry it will differ like that. So, generally it is taken as percentage contribution whenever it is less than 10 percent we will go by that measures as a acceptability of the instrument as when the variance component is concerned over here. So, total gauge RNR study this variance component should be less than 10 percent that we are recommending over here. So, if it is less than 10 percent then we are we are ok with the instrument like that. But what is our concern over here although it is less than 10 percent there is some interaction between the parts and operators and operator to operator different differentiation is happening over here we need to see what is going wrong over here. So, if we can minimize that that variability will also reduce although the significant we are not getting high values over here because this is 3.6. So, you have to be judgmental over here you cannot be statistically significant. So, we will reject that one no we have another criteria of acceptance there are various criterias in measurement system analysis which needs to be considered before we take a decision whether to use the instrument or not to use the instrument like that ok. This is one of the major percentage contribution like this we can also find out we can also find out the with respect to process variation there is another measure which is which percentage variability. So, we we can also go to that PPT is over here. So, this is calculated over here there is there is another important component over here that you see standard deviation study variations over here. So, if I copy this we will copy a picture over here and we can paste it over here. So, we can we can paste this information over here and we can just enlarge this image over here. So, what do you observe is that this standard deviation 1.34 is nothing, but what you are seeing. So, this is the variance repeatability that that you are observing. So, it is sigma square if you take a square root of this you will get. So, if I if I can see this one. So, if you see this one. So, this is the variance component that we have calculated that this is the variance component 1.8037. So, and then standard deviation we can also calculate. So, if you take the square root of this it will be 1.34. Similarly, all these values are calculated. So, this this is basically represented this is variance component what we have collected total gauge R and R. So, standard deviation is the square root of this and if you take the square root of this and then you get all the components over here. Similarly, if you want to see the study variability you multiply it with 6 and 6 multiplied by standard deviation gives you all this measure over here. And based on this we can calculate also study variation percentage study variation. So, 8.051 this is the study variation with respect to total how much it is it is around 18 percent over here ok. In addition to this what we can do is that we can also add process variability historic process variability over here that can that is also possible to be incorporated over here and that gives you a different percentage over here which is 22 how this is coming. So, that we can see. So, this is how the calculation happens in unit have interface is that. So, after this what you can do is that you can you can just mention. So, study variations of this. So, something we we have over here let us try to see whether we have given this one gauge R and R cross to over here. So, this is options over here. So, in this case 6 standard deviation with respect to percentage standard deviation and this is calculated from the historic information or this is calculated from the sample. So, here what we can do is that we can we can provide information over here. So, percentage study variation. So, this is this is done over here. So, once again. So, this is the slide let me go back to the slide. So, process variation we have given information of the process variability over here that is why this percentage is calculated percentage process variation is calculated over here. So, let me go back what what we can give over here as process variability. So, what what is required is that I will go to Minitab and then let me try to see what is the variation of this process there is the last one. So, we can calculate the basic statistics display basic statistics I want to see the Montgomery's measurement and I want to see the standard deviation we we only want standard deviation information over here and this is around standard deviation is 6.75 6.75 no. So, 6.75. So, we can just calculate 6 point we can calculate 6.75 multiplied by 6 is around 40.5 that we have done also 40.5. So, what we have to do is that stat quality tools and gauge R&R studies. So, gauge crossed over here. So, in this case options what we provide is that 6.75 we can write 6.75 what we are getting over here and we can also say that use parts to estimate the process variability over here. So, I will click observations historic we can we can replace that one with the ah measurement of variations what we have, but we can also say use parts in the study to estimate process variability that is the overall process variability we can indicate that one when you click this one and it will go by the ah that measure only. So, when I have click this one. So, it will estimate process variability of standard deviation based on the observation that is given in this experimentation that we have ah we have considered. So, if you click ok then ah then you will get this information which is percentage process variability over here. So, if I copy this one and we can paste this over here and then we will have another information over here that is 19 point what what we observe over here. So, percentage process variability. So, study variation is measured over here in respect to so, more or less study variation if it covers the overall process it will be more or less near to this one study variation and percentage process variation over here. So, the criteria that is used for the study variation process variation is that ah whenever it is less than 30 percent we we try to accept that instrument. So, if it is less than 10 percent very good instrument 10 to 30 percent what what what is recommended is that ah you need to be very precautious and see whether we can reduce that one ah variability that is happening process variation ah with respect to process variation study variation if study variation is contributing more ah with respect to process variation then that is a concern for us operative this part to part variability will be high and this summation of this what will happen is that it will not turn up to be 100 over here. So, this is 100 over here, but this this is with respect to ratio that we are taking over here and study variation and process variation and then percentage we are converting. So, it will not be equals to 100 when we sum this up. So, ah the criteria over here is that ah when we go by that contribution it should be less than 10 percent when I going by study variability or process variations over here then the criteria may be 30 and it depends on the industry to industry what what is the standard. But overall concern over here is that now we have operator operator to operator variations is happening and also part to operator there is a interactions that is observed. So, we can correct that one and try to see more more into the instrument and figure out what is going wrong ah, but the instrument can be ah suggested for use for the time being and we figure out how to reduce this one interaction between parts and operators and operator to operator how we can reduce that one further. So, that it becomes insignificant basically. So, we will stop here what we will do is that we will continue with some more examples on this which which is taken from the manual QS manuals like that ok. And some more examples where we have bad ah bad instruments like that. So, how to understand that one and graphical display that we are having. So, we want to explain that one also because when we when you get the mini type information we also get a graphical interpretation also over here. So, what what is this graph meaning of this graph that we will explain after this before we entered into design of experiment basically. So, thank you for listening.


Well, they gettin' crazy with you these days. That weed so motherfuckin' good.  Hey, that weed so motherfuckin' good. Hello, hello, one, two, hello, hello. Tran Lee on the beat. Okay. Tran Lee on the beat. Okay, coming down. Brand new shoes. Come on. Carlos Miller. Say what? Interviews. Interviews. They my dudes. They your dudes. I can't do it. No, no. Try to blame me. Uh-uh. I refuse.  No, matter fact, I can do it myself cause I'm parking on the self parking. I hit the left and then the right and then the steering real signal. Just to know that I'm original. Coming through crispy. Nigga, can you hear me? Spay the words like a nigga coming through. Hey, stop it one more time. Then bring it back. We used to sell smack notes. We didn't do that. Matter of fact, we was outside while they was doin' it. Watchin' them take their lives and then ruin it. Hey, we had dreams and we came out on the other side. We flip the script every time that it's time to ride. I wasn't even at that time. When niggas got the trippin' and pulled out them nines. But I heard about it cause you told me. But that was in my old life, the old me. But there ain't no OG just a G for a long time. Just because you're G ain't like mine. I been had my G since like 99. Or maybe 89. Or maybe 79. What? That's probably when I started formulating.  It took a little while, a little wait. But be patient. Come on, nigga. You know what I do. I keep a rhyme on deck or maybe I'ma keep two.  Cause when I got nothin' to do, I be listenin' to you. Now that you know.  It's time for you to get your excellence on. Wow.  They ever come out of Alabama with my man Transleath. Amen. He said it. Transleath. Go, PMC, visionary, humanitarian, recycler, water drinker. Man, come on, man. Man of the earth, man of the turf. How you livin'? Welcome back to the trap. I did just finish drinking one of those just waters. You want to know? Yeah, I mean, I definitely would.  I'll drink. I got Capri, man. I got it on deck, man. You're not a visitor at this point. Oh, Capri, son. Okay. Come on, man. Live your life. Okay. How you doin'? I'm good, man. It's been a new brand. Yeah, man. Yeah, it's been a long time coming, man. It's been a long time coming. But I've been told you that. Right, right, right, man. We done had several conversations, man.   Yeah.  So that could take a toll on people, yeah. So, you know, you know, I'm just here now as somebody who's kind of made it to the other side.  Like, let's just be ourselves and, you know, try to find that inner peace so we can have that outer glow and then that pump to me to start the brand. So here we are.  That's your hoodie in the middle. All right, man. So inner peace. Mm-hmm. How did you find it? Well, so that's the thing. It's a constant journey, you know what I mean? Like, I don't think that you can find it and then keep it for, like, the rest of your life, you know what I mean? But it's just being cognizant of, you know, if you're not in that space to always be kind of seeking it because that way, you know, you'll let a lot of things go.     So it's just like simple things in life that can change the course of your day, you know? And it's like once you find that inner peace, you know, you can, you know, live with it. Prosper. Yeah. Level up. Get to the bag. Get to the bag.  You know, that's what I'm trying to do anyway. Prosper. Level up. That's all I hear. Get to the bag. Inner peace. Out of the globe. You sound like a real preacher, bro. Bro, y'all gonna stop trying. You really are. Stop. You really are, bro. You don't, you don't sat, but you from Mississippi, though. You don't sat in enough churches. That's exactly, that's enough credentials right there. Yeah, you don't sat in enough churches, too. You can, you can definitely be a preacher, man. But, but, but yeah, man, and it's been doing very well, man. Shout out to my partner, Life Journey. I started the brand with him just to kind of partner in, just to kind of get into the game. And we did pretty well, man. So now it's inner peace out of the globe.com. And you can get, you can get it. And we're also dropping a lot of content too. Just to, you know, about. What kind of content? Just really people's different journeys to how they found inner peace and, you know, like what things that they do to help them find it. I smoke weed to find mine. Exactly. That's what a lot of people do. Yeah, I smoke weed. That's definitely what I do. So, and I think that that can help a lot of people. So we're definitely dropping those interviews. And then just a lot of more dazzling content. Dazzling. Coming soon, yeah. Like visually stimulated. Mm-hmm. Okay, man. You dropping any video? For the branding for my... For any, for your music. Yeah, so that's on the way too, man. That's what, you know, that's really... I'm like super excited because I finally got the album done into a place where it's like I can, I can now feel comfortable to say like, yo, it's really coming. It's really, it's really like a peace, you know what I mean? So, we just tying up a little bit of the loose ends right now. Yeah. So sat down, tipped the other day and played it for him. And he was like. You in that zone? Yeah. Yeah, so.   And I just always look at and break down how he, he sits you right in the seat next to him. You know what I mean? Like when you listen to it and it's like, I strive to be that type of artist. So, you know, I'm, I feel like I'm kind of getting more and more in that space, you know what I mean? Most definitely. Yeah. Most definitely. Speaking of most dead people trying to compare me to. He dope. Yeah. He is dope. But you know, I get it a lot. That is a good dope, bro. Yeah. This is for the murderers and gamblers and dirty money handlers. Yeah. Now most definitely. I actually opened up for him a couple of years ago. You see? Yeah.  Right. He had a Capri son in a long time, bro. That's why you need to come through the trap more often because we keep him on deck, bro. And then. Capri sons help us find our inner peace. This the place where you hear smoking on hay in the middle of the barn. Yeah. You don't hear that many places, bro. I said that over there. I was like, man, you don't hear this many places. Joe was like, you need to hang around cool with circles, bro. Good. And the crazy parties, all these niggas was lame until they started hanging with me. For real? No, man. Sprinkle sauce on all them niggas. You got to throw a little bit or everything.  I say right. J.O.N. had all gospel music on his computer. Oh, man.  Straight Kirk, bro. Now look at that. Look at her. Running the empire. Got all black owned brands on. But you know what? You know what the big thing is? White people ain't supporting black owned business, man.  They ain't spending no money in the black community. You right. You right. That's facts.  So any white people that's watching this right now, innerpeaceoutofgirl.com, you can put your money way out mouth. Yeah. And you can lie and tell your friends you got it from J.Crew. Whatever you got to do, feel better about yourself.  You should. You need to be open to opportunities. Yeah, for sure. Because you know we just got to speak them. They, Lulu Lemon might hear this and reach out. Hey, TransLink, we really like your music. Somebody over there, bro. You know what's crazy?  Shout out to Gray in the building. My boy Gray in the building. Hey, man. Plant-based dripping. We actually did, he did a whole partnership with them a couple years ago for the vegan Thanksgiving. So they're already in the space of like, you know, supporting black owned brands.  And then he'll jump in the Crown Vic. Right. And right. 38 or the hottest bars. Bars ever, bro. Like if I tell them all the time. Sing two hooks. Like, bro, you just like, the beat, you just fluid on the beat, bro, man. Yeah.  Exactly. Because it's true. Yeah, it's real life.  Because he's earned his right to do that. Yeah.  Yeah, and he can make a sound good.  So I was up at the office, man. I heard a song that you did. What song? I was hot. I don't know. What song was it? I don't know. We got to talk about that. Who's going to stop me? When you seen a nigga stop me from doing anything? It was fire, though. It was fire.  I let this shoot. After I heard you, I was like, I'm just going to chill. It was fire. Let's do this comedy, bro. Folks don't know, we go back, too, man, because we shot, I'm in a, I'm in a, like, a little movie. I ain't going to tell you what it's called because it's super lame. But... Is it? I ain't going to call them niggas in the movie lame. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I was with Brad earlier. So no, I'm not saying that the role, actually the role I was playing was super lame. There you go. That's better cleaning up. So I don't want to be extending y'all to it. But that's where I first met Lowe's, man. That was probably about what? That may have been, like, eight, nine years ago. Yeah, I had about two lads, but my two lads was... It was killing. He said it's a free lunch kid. That was in line because they was throwing it. The kids was throwing the food. He was like, it's a free lunch kid. I'm going to go ahead and say it. Too loud, bro.  I don't...   But they doubled him over, though. That's what I'm saying. I didn't put in too... At the premiere... I didn't get way too much. When we went to the premiere, he had to do stand-up at the premiere.  I mean, he didn't have to...  But you did. They really... They really was needing me at this premiere. But he was...  And yeah, man, I've been following you ever since. Well, I appreciate that, you know.  Yeah, man.   Right.    Because the people who are watching this, they'll be like... We didn't know you were ready for more shit, Carlos. We're sorry. We got six lines for you. We're going to cut two of those and you have four. You got to let them know, man. It's whatever.  You can't let them nab you, man. Why you bring that up? That's my dog, though. But you know, they didn't even tell Eddie Murphy about me. Really? Shot a whole movie with him. Didn't even weigh his hoodies down there or nothing. Damn. Shout out in that green though, man. You shot him out. I ain't doing that. He know what he did. He know exactly what he did. It was on purpose. Damn, bro. If I was around Eddie, man, I would never tell him. You would have told him? Yeah. Bro, you are my top five comedian, bro. I appreciate that. For real? I appreciate that. Thanks, man. You know. It's been a long journey, Transly. Amen. I've seen the game change multiple times. Nothing. It's going to keep on changing, man. But laughing is always relevant. You know what I mean? Ain't nothing more relevant. Yeah, man. People so... They criticize comedy so much, but I thought the whole goal was just to create laughter. But y'all have the longest leash of anybody. What you mean? They can say anything. It's like, okay. What means you... No, I don't think that. I think rappers got to say whatever and they'll still be cool. Yeah, that's true.  That's the fact. And then all I have is a rapper say some things and they're like, what? Yeah.   That's what it is. That's life.  Keep chasing the inner peace. And then really, you know, it's... That's what's going to give you the outer global. There's so many people that people find attractive just because they're glowing so much from having that inner peace. They just like... It's just oozing out of them. And it's like versus some people that the world may consider attractive but they're so... They don't have it and it's just something about it that's just not there. So, you know, it's just all about no matter what you look like, if you have that inner peace, you will have that outer glow. So that's really the premise of the brand. And we just want to help people, you know, like while we're here on this earth, the time that we have, let's do a little bit to push things forward. Our POG? Our power. That's what's in the... That's the dope bucket, man. Where can they find it at? So the buckets, man. The buckets aren't even out yet, man.  And then people are going to be trying to buy it. Shout out to my girl Chelsea, man. The Black Scholastic on Instagram. She actually put these together and ordered them and everything. And like, yo, you need to get these. And I'm like, look at you. Bro, I ain't even got to... You got to wait. You got to wait, bro. Bro, you know, we about to... This bucket has season, bro. We about to have. We about to have. Drop the link where it might be. Interpeaceoutaglow.com. Interpeaceoutaglow.com. I-N-N-E-R-P-E-A-C-E-O-U-T-E-R-G-L-O-W. And in the meantime, tell them what they need to be listening to.  That boy Tyler Chronicles just walked in the building, man. You know what I'm saying? That's not his name. His name is Trapkevious. But yeah, man, so, you know, shout out to all the movers and shakers. The shakers and the movers. The shakers and the movers. The crooks and the motherfuckers. It's all about it. It's all about it. We all about it. They from South Shore, man, y'all. Love what y'all doing, man. We're creating Black Excellence. I remember when me and Gray came and did a show with a member, and we started talking about, like, conspiracy stuff, and they remember that thing fell? Yeah, I remember. It was in there? Yeah, I remember. Yeah, it was crazy. Yeah, yeah. Ain't nothing going to fall today. Okay. He is deep from that. Yeah, man. But see, just how far you... I love what y'all doing, man. My cousins be hitting me up. Like, you know, Carl. They don't believe that. Man, I got some family that's, you know, just from the country. So, like, they see what people from, like, it's from the Grams. So, it's like, you know... Sometimes I have some phone calls, and it just be people on the other end, too. Hey, man, you in my cousin. Tell them. Yeah. In those exact words, you is my cousin. You. Cous, man. People love it. Like, a lot of times, especially when you're in these remote places, like, that's all you got, you know what I mean? I know. I be in the remote places, too. Yeah.  What y'all doing? They're shooting a circuit, bro. They love you forever, though. They sell out in them niche places. That's why, like, oh, yeah, he good forever. He good forever. Like, you can go do the New York to L.A., but everybody can't go do Savannah and Huntsville or Alabama. You know what I'm saying? That's them places where you got to be nice, real, and all of those. Yeah, man. You know what I'm saying? You know what I'm saying? It's all about me. It's all about inner peace, and, you know, I know it's going to be successful for you because you got grand and hustle talent and you're a good dude, man.  And this you right here, bro. Yeah. Yeah. Tell something about it and know something about it. Tell something about it. I already got the ones that's going to hit that hole.


Just because you're rolling in money doesn't mean house hunting is always easy. Just ask power couple Beyoncé and Jay-Z who spent over three years looking for their dream home only to settle on an $88 million dollar modern mansion. These days they live in the posh Bel Air, Los Angeles And it's just as magical as you would expect. Their palace is made of steel glass and limestone and offers over 30,000 square feet of space along with features like four swimming pools We're gonna take a look at where the pair calls home and you won't want to miss a look at their insane fortress In these videos, we don't reveal any addresses even though I've done a house tour of my own place Please do not show up at any private residences because it's not safe for anyone Beyoncé and Jay-Z are a force to be reckoned with and the star couple definitely embodies success in its highest form As a singer, songwriter and actress, Bey has not only changed pop music But used her status to speak up for important issues. Her husband of 13 years Jay-Z is just as successful Not only his music career, but also being a businessman record executive and much more The two have been crazy in love since 2001 and aside from their three children They've also built an empire together being worth a combined $1 billion or more Needless to say Beyoncé and Jay-Z have lived in some spectacular homes over the years With their current one being the most jaw-dropping of them all Hey guys, it's Kara the vampire slayer back with another exclusive house tour here on famous entertainment This one looking at where Jay-Z and Beyoncé call home Be sure to subscribe and ring that bell for notifications because we post brand new videos daily As always you can follow me over on instagram if you'd like to chat and now let's get into this video It took Jay-Z and Beyoncé years to find their current dream home in 2014 The couple lost out on a 70 million dollar Beverly Hills mansion Being outbid by the creator of Minecraft Marcus person and later they lost out on another nearby mansion Finally in summer of 2017 the power couple would score their current residents a contemporary style spec built Bel Air mansion while the asking price was at a whopping 120 million dollars And Bey and Jay were able to snag it for 88 million dollars, which at this point is looking like a discount Is a true trophy home that shows just how successful this couple really is The 1.88 acre property actually included a 9,000 square foot colonial revival mansion when it was last purchased in 2013 But it was immediately torn down and replaced with the uber modern estate that sits in its place Jay-Z and Beyoncé's property is more like a compound encompassing six buildings multiple pools separate staff quarters and plenty more outdoor features Altogether the structures make up a combined 30,000 square feet of living space or so And the estate is a smart home equipped with all of the latest tech features For example, all it takes is the push of a button to open the glass walls Safety isn't an issue here either with features like bulletproof windows And the entire place is situated behind massive iron gates While the mansion was stacked with everything you could need and more reportedly the couple spent an additional 750k on changes like adding a backup generator and another living area under the many pools Located near Bel Air's east gate Beyoncé and Jay-Z's home is in a posh neighborhood And there are eight bedrooms and 11 bathrooms throughout aerial views show how large and impressive it is And we can see the backyard is divided into different levels A level right off the home has an infinity pool and plenty of green space While the one below you can access by travertine-towed stairs Up on the roof you'll find one of the pools which probably has the best view of all And it's said the huge white space at the top is also a helipad It's said that the architect of the home Paul McLean loves long skinny pools like these ones And we can see that especially in the pool on the second level the boutique hotel sized home offers panoramic city views And inside the multiple floors are linked together with an amazing circular staircase lined with butter soft leather In fact, the sculptural stairs were allegedly carved using a single piece of wood Before being lined with dark brown leather while the steps are made of limestone automatic glass walls throughout the home Opened to reveal over 10,000 square feet of outdoor living space and terraces as well for the ultimate indoor outdoor vibe You wouldn't expect bay and jade to have anything but the best in their kitchen while the home was still under construction The builder installed top of the line appliances and we can see there are two large islands that were custom made in italy The nearby living room has a wall sized marble fireplace And of course that floor to ceiling glass with killer views A luxe bathroom on an upper level of the mansion has views right into the trees As well as a massive soaking tub perfect for the couple to unwind and a separate shower The bathrooms are definitely high end many with Kolkata marble floors and limestone sinks This bathroom has a tankless toilet that's environmentally friendly While all of the wall mounted toilets in their home can be opened closed and flushed without even touching them Looking at Jay-Z and Beyonce's media room or home theater It has all of the best avi equipment with plush furnishings to unwind. We'll enjoy the show There's a recessed lighting a massive screen and a door that's rumored to be covered in lizard skin While we can see photos of a sprawling room referred to as the master suite We can assume the couple has switched up the space since moving in Either way, there's a wall mounted electric fireplace here And of course some more retractable glass walls leading out to a private terrace Additional features in the mansion include a library office a space for recording studio and a spa fitness suite With gym hot tub sauna and his and hers steam rooms As I mentioned the amenities continue on the grounds the basketball court garage space for up to 15 cars separate staff quarters and those four pools Beyonce has given glimpses of their epic palace on instagram including the backyard We can see the clean aesthetic with black marble walls and neutral colored stone floors We can imagine the couple enjoys some down time here with their kids whenever they get the opportunity While the mansion has a formal sitting room Bey and Jay also have a family room that's more laid back It boasts mahogany hardwood floors and abstract rug fireplace and acute caricature of the singer Elsewhere of course Beyonce also has a stunning walk-in wardrobe to keep all of her designer looks She's sure to look inside her wardrobe while getting ready for red carpet events It's decked out with wooden floors and cream walls as well as a huge floor-to-ceiling mirror framed with warm light bulbs Since moving in the couple has also filled their home with artwork that reflects their style and personality And it appears they have a good eye Altogether, Beyonce and Jay-Z have worked hard to transform this mega home into their dream residence with their own touches When Jay and Bey want to get away to the east coast they have a beautiful retreat in the Hamptons to escape to The pair had their sights set here for a while after renting many upscale vacation homes in the area Finally purchasing their own estate in 2017 called Pond House This estate cost them just under 26 million dollars And it's situated on two acres of land with 203 feet of direct waterfront The couple's beautiful property is in the east Hamptons on the shores of Georgica Pond Right next to a 17-acre meadow preserve and inside the mansion It spans 12,000 square feet of space the main home boasts seven beds and nine baths while there's an additional 1,800 square foot guest cottage complete with two beds a bathroom living area and kitchen The pond house was designed by stanford white in 2008 before being renovated more recently by jeffry collay And he rotated the entire abode by 90 degrees So the living room would face the lake jeffrey was also responsible for a bunch of decorative features inside as well Like the white oak paneling the hand carved marble tub and the hand pegged parquet diversi floors Which just sound fancy throughout the estate There are actually a bunch of 18th century louis the 14th carves soon fireplaces Lead window panes and vaulted ceilings all of which add character Beyond z and jz's hamptons home also boasts a double height entrance hall and living room Both with two story windows and paneled oakwood walls other goodies in this mansion include heated marble bathtubs A turkish limestone wraparound terrace and even more to offer outside Here you'll find an infinity edge pool and spa on the pond side of the property As well as an outdoor grilling area with that we've checked out where Beyonce and jz call home So that brings us to the end of our house tour. I gotta say the power couple has one of the most unique and modern homes I've seen not to mention the place is absolutely massive and has not one but four pools I mean really I love a pool as much or more than the next guy But how can you make use of one on every level either way? What did you guys like best about their bell air compound or what did you not like their house is something else? But I personally like a more classic home with character and I honestly prefer the pond house mansion in the hamptons Anyone else agree be sure to let me know what you liked or didn't like about Beyonce and jz's estates down in the comments Thanks for watching. Don't forget to follow me on instagram and I will see you all in the next video. Bye


Hello everyone, greetings from Manipal Hospital Baner Pune, I am Dr. Karan Chanchlani, a radiation oncologist and a neuro-oncologist. Today, we will be discussing about an interesting case of medulloblastoma which is a childhood brain tumor.  These tumors typically have a propensity to spread not just locally, they also spread along the entire neuraxis. So, they can spread from brain to the spinal cord or to the other areas of the brain. They are also it is difficult to treat these because they arise in a growing age or a growing brain in which any treatment may actually cause further damage to the growth of the brain and we need to take care of the long term consequences of the treatment. So, coming specifically to this case, this was a 6 year old male child who presented with a small mass inside. So, he presented with headaches and vomiting and then little imbalance and MRI was done wherein he had a mass inside the posterior side of the brain, the cerebellar region and it was radiologically very conclusive of medulloblastoma. So, he was stabilized and then in the pediatric intensivist and the neuro team were involved and contemplated for a neurosurgery. So, typically the surgery for these cases is maximal safe resection. So, looking at the images it was apparent that the child had probably a long standing growth and it had it was very close to the brainstem maybe probably it appeared like infiltrating the brainstem also, but nevertheless with advanced techniques the neurosurgeons were able to remove that tumor completely and we subjected the tumor specimen for surgical pathology and it confirmed medulloblastoma classical variant. Along with that we did certain molecular tests to ascertain the molecular profile of these tumors. So, these days it is classified as wind pathway. So, there are various pathways which have very different prognosis. So, our patient had a favorable pathway called as wind pathway and we could based on the near complete resection that was done and the other assessment on MRI and CSF studies we could ascertain that this patient was of a low risk or average risk medulloblastoma that had been resected completely. So, we planned craniospinal radiation. So, we need to treat the entire neuraxis in the first phase for the initial treatment and then later on plan a focal boost of radiation to the area where the tumor had arise. So, since it was a low risk or average risk medulloblastoma with a favorable profile on molecular studies we decided to go with low dose CSI that is low dose of radiation to the entire neuraxis from brain to spine and the remaining dose was just boosted on the tumor and total it took around 6 weeks to complete the radiation and along with that we had to deliver concurrent chemotherapy as well as some cycles of chemotherapy after the radiation. The main challenge over here is to reduce the doses to the rest of the structures while treating such a large volume. So, your eyes, your oral cavity, thyroid, the entire body structures have received some dose of the radiation. We had one of the few centers wherein we treat with these type of cases with a volumetric approach rather than the conventional field setup approach because conventional field radiations used to have problems with field junction matching and all. So, that is why we have adopted a completely volumetric approach with latest advanced linear accelerator and that is how we could reduce the doses to the subsequent structures. Image guidance was used for matching the target volumes before treatment each day and during the CSI as well as the focal boost area. And this child completed his treatment with hardly any toxicities one of the most dreaded toxicities for these children is in the acute sitting is the fall in the blood counts or neutropenias. So, this child had hardly any neutropenias or any support required additionally the doses to the ear to the eyes were very low and he is on follow up. So, now so far he has not developed any of the toxicities and we hope that this child continues to remain healthy. Usually these type of tumors have excellent prognosis with almost up to 80 to 90 percent 5 year survival. So, we just hope that this kid also enjoys such a good prognosis. Thank you.