Ladies and gentlemen, the story you're about to hear is true. The names have been changed to protect the innocent.  You're assigned a juvenile detail. Four children in your city have apparently been abandoned by their mares, as a possibility of foul play. Your job, investigate. It was Friday, February 8th. It was raining in Los Angeles. We were working the night watch out a juvenile detail. My partner is Frank Smith. The boss is Captain Powers. My name is Friday. I was on my way back from juvenile hall and it was 746 p.m. when I got to 1335 Georgia Street, the office. Joe? Yeah, Irene. You talked to Captain Powers? Yeah, the way it looks, Frank's gonna be tied up in court for a couple of days, going kinda hard. Game war, isn't it? Yeah, seems like everybody in town's climbed on this one, really making a big thing out of it. Uh-huh. Donald Skipper said I was supposed to give you a hand on anything that might come up. Then you just made it. Woman in the next office, you better talk to her. What's it about? I'll be better if you got it straight from her. What is it, Frank? I don't think so, see what you can figure. All right. Mrs. Eggers?  Yes, ma'am. I'd like you to meet Sergeant Friday. Joe, this is Mrs. Eggers. How do you do? Mrs. Eggers? Well, if you'd give him the story the way you told it to me, you bet I will. Sit down, young man, I'll tell you all about it. All right. Get your book out. I beg your pardon? Your book.  Well, if you'll just tell us what this is all about. Yeah. Well, I don't want you to get the idea about him the nosy type, I'm not. It's just that I take an interest in the things that go on around me. Civil minded is the way they put it in the papers. Of course, there are people who say that I pay too much mind to their business, but it isn't true, not a bit of it. If you'd tell the sergeant what happened. Oh, yeah. Well, these people moved into the house about six months ago, the five of them. Yes, ma'am. Stevie, Pamela, Carol, Martin, and the mother, Rowena, four kids and the mother. All right, would you like to go on? Well, now, right off, I could spot this woman. It's been a lot of them. How do you mean that, Miss Eggers? You can make it crystal, if it's any easier. Yes, ma'am. What did you mean that you've seen a lot of them? Alchies, you know, drunks. Mm-hmm. Well, she's one. I could spot it right off. Her are most four beautiful children. Yeah. Well, the first few months they lived there, I'd maybe see her a couple of times a week. You know, going in the house or coming out, just a couple of times a week. I see. Last week, 10 days, I hadn't seen her at all. Not even a little sight. Mm-hmm. So right off, I figured that something was wrong. That's what it looks to me. All right, thank you, Miss Eggers. We'll check on the house right away. That's what I wanted this police woman to do. I told her I'd go right along with you. Well, I won't be necessary. Now listen, young man, if there's anything wrong with them kids, I want to know about it. I'll do my part. The whole neighborhood's talking. Is that right? Sure. Little Stevie's been to all the houses looking for something to do, asking for work. It just seems to me that there's something wrong about the whole caboodle of them. Not seeing the mother in the way the boy don't eat the lunch plate, not seeing the other kids. There's something that don't fit over there. All right, ma'am, we'll look right into it. You just do that. We'll see what I say is true. Thank you, Mr. Eggers. Don't go thanking me. Just trying to be civil-minded, that's all. Mm-hmm. It seems that there isn't anybody who cares about those kids. Well, that's not true, Miss Eggers. What? We do. 8.14 p.m., police woman Irene Gardner and I left the office and drove over to the address the Eggers woman had given us. The house was a small one-story clabbered building located on the rear of the lot. The front yard was overgrown with weeds and there were neighborhood advertising papers lying around. When we arrived, there was a faint light on in one of the front rooms. Irene and I went up to the front door and we knocked. We got no answer. I tried the door, but we found it locked. There was no sound from inside the place. The shades were drawn over the window so that it was impossible for us to see into the house. We walked around to the rear and tried the back door. Locked? Yeah, it doesn't look like there's anybody home. Mm-hmm. Let's talk to that Eggers woman again, huh? All right. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it? The story she gave us, the kid should be at home. She might be seeing things, Joe. You know, trying to figure out some way to get attention. Yeah, it might be. You see Mike at the meeting, huh? Joe? What? What do you got there? The front window. There, you see it? Yeah, there's somebody in there. Come on, let's go. Try it again. Yeah. Not answering. Open up in there. We know you're in there, come on. Open the door. Police doctors, let us in. There's nothing wrong, go away. No, we can't do that. Now come on, open up. Nobody, we just want to talk to you. Are you sure that's all? That's right. You Pamela Kelford? I haven't done anything wrong. Oh, we didn't say you did. Then what are you doing around here? What are you looking for? Your mother in? What?  Well, yeah, she's here. Well, we'd like to see her if it's all right. You can't, you can't see her. Well, I'm afraid we're gonna have to. She's lying down asleep. That's why you can't talk to her. Well, what's the matter, little girl? Nothing. Why'd you have something like that? Don't you think you'd better let us in?  But she's asleep. She's tired. You can't talk to her, you can't. Now come on. You want to go in and wake her up? There's some things we've got to talk to her about. I wonder if we could come in if it's kind of wet out here. Hmm? How about it?  I guess we can come in. I guess it's all right. Come on in, Joe. Yeah. The front room was about 12 feet square. The only light in the room came from a candle and a jellyglass on a table. The only furniture in the place was the table that held the candle and a torn artificial leather and chrome couch. The floor was covered with paper, rain-soaked cardboard boxes and dirty clothes. At a half a dozen different places drops of dirty water were seeping through the roof. The water was being caught in empty tin cans that had been placed around the room. To the left was a door to a bedroom. In it, in a wooden crib were two children. From the descriptions we've gotten from the Eggers woman, we recognize them as Martin Telford, age four, and his sister Carol, age two. As soon as the children saw Irene and me, they hid their heads under the dirty blanket that covered the crib. There was nothing else in the room except the dirty mattress lying on the floor in one corner. From the appearance of the bedding, it hadn't been laundered or changed in at least three weeks. On the other side of the house, a small kitchen was piled high with dirty dishes, pieces of rotting food and empty tin cans. The plumbing in the house had apparently been out of order for several weeks. While Irene and I looked over the house, the girl who'd met us at the door, Pamela Telford, followed us. When we got back to the front room, she started to cry. All right, you want to tell us where she is? Come on, Pamela, it's not as bad as all that, is it? Here, here's a hand for you. Here you are. Now, where's your mother? She's out looking for a job. I was kind of late for that, isn't it? I don't know. That's what she's doing now. I was looking for a job. Well, now, why'd you tell us if she was here tonight? Because I didn't know what you wanted. I thought you were trying to arrest her. Well, why'd you think that? Because that's what she said. Your mother said that? Yes. She told us that policeman arrested people. She told us about it, how you did it once to her. Your mother's been arrested? Yes. Do you know why? Because she was. Well, what for, do you know? She got sick.  That's why I told you she was asleep. I thought that you'd go away and leave us alone. It's your cold in here. Yeah. Do you have any heat in the house, Pamela? There's a heater in the bedroom. Oh, I'll turn it on. Good. It doesn't work. What? The heater doesn't work. Marty was playing one day and he built the little rods in it. It doesn't work anymore. Well, we should be able to get some heat out of it. No, you won't. There isn't any gas. They turned it off. Well, I think maybe you youngsters better come downtown with us, don't you think? Why? Well, it'll be warm down there. A lot more comfortable for you. We can't go. We've got to wait here. That's all right, Pamela. We'll leave work for your mother where you are.  No, it's Steve. He's a placement. What do you want? There's nothing wrong here. Nothing for you to come buttoning for. We want to see your mother, son. She hasn't done anything. Why don't your cops leave her alone? All the time you're after, never leave her alone. You're kind of rough for a little guy, aren't you? That's none of your business. I know my rights. I know I'm good. Well, look here, son. We're going to take you downtown and give you a good meal just until we can talk to your mother. That's all. Then you're going to bring us back? I will see. How about Marty and Carol? You taking them two? Yeah. Going to give them something to eat? Yes, that's right. OK, we'll go with you. Just for the night, though. That's all. Just for the night.  Yeah. Want another thing? Yes, what's that? We're paying our own way. I've got money. Anything you give us, we're going to pay for it. Oh, you won't have to do that, son? Well, I'm going to. We don't need charity. We're getting along all right. Everybody has a little rock, rock now on there. Everybody, mum tries. She really does. She's been looking for a job for a long time. All right, Steve. You want to help get the others ready to leave? I'm not sure we can go. Well, I'm afraid you're going to have to, son. All right, but just for the night, the only reason is that I want Marty and Carol and Pamela to have something hot to eat. There's something wrong with the stoves as you can't cook on it. That's the only reason we're going, just because there's something wrong with the stove. The gas has turned up. No, it isn't. Just don't work. Whatever we eat, whatever we get, we're going to pay for it. I've got the money. Well, I told you once before that won't be necessary. But it's true. We're not taking any charity. We've never taken any. We're not going to start now either. Anything that's done for us is going to be paid for. Yeah, I guess that's right, Steve. Huh? It'll be paid for. 8.56 p.m. Men from the crime lab arrived and photographed the entire house. The pictures were held for evidence. A search of the house showed that there was no food for the children. In a cardboard box in the bedroom under a pile of toilet articles, we found a photograph of a man and a woman taken at what appeared to be a beach photographer. Irene and I checked through the rest of the house, but we found nothing that would indicate where the mother of the four Telford children had gone. The youngsters were taken to juvenile hall, bathed, given clean clothes, and fed. At first, Steve Telford refused to eat anything until he was assured that his two sisters and his brother were being given the same kind of food. After the boy had finished eating, Irene and I talked to him. His previous uncooperative attitude had changed, and he seemed anxious to help us find his mother. This is the longest she's ever been gone. The game to think there might be something wrong. Well, when did you see her last, Steve? This is Friday, isn't it? Yes, February 8th. Uh-huh. It was last Tuesday, then. You mean this week, son? No. A week ago. A week ago Tuesday. Well, what did she say when she left? Just like always. She said she wasn't feeling very good, and she was going out and trying to look for work. What kind of work does she do? She's a waitress, a good one, too. Mm-hmm. That's a trouble, I guess. She's so good. What do you mean? Well, there are only a couple of places that mom says are any good. Well, you know where she went to work. Well, I don't really understand what you mean, Steve. Well, Momori said that she wasn't just a hash slinger. That's what she called. Oh, I see. She said that she was a waitress, and she couldn't go to work just any place. Mm-hmm. Where'd she work last? The big place out in Beverly Hills. For God's sake, name her right now.  Well, she had some trouble, and then she had to quit. What do you mean, trouble? Well, she got sick. And the man who was the boss got mad at her. And I guess he said a lot of things that Mom didn't like. So Mom told him that he couldn't talk to her like that, and then she quit.  Steve? No, she didn't. Did you see a doctor about it? You might as well know it. You got to know it. What's up? Well, Mom drank a lot. Sometimes she'd drink too much, and then she'd get sick. That's what was wrong. Where's your father, Steve? He died before Carol was born. Right before. I want you to take a look at a picture for us, will you? Look at it and tell us if you know who the man in it is. All right. Yeah. That's Mom. You know who the man is? No. I don't think I've ever seen him before. Does your mother have any men friends? No, I don't think so. At least she never told me about him. She always said that the kids were enough for her, that we were all that mattered. She used to say that when she got a steady job, we were all going to live good. She used to tell us how one day the phone had rang and all our troubles would be over, just like that. One day we've had a little trouble, and the next, everything was going to be all right. She really believed it too. Just all of a sudden, the phone was going to ring and all our troubles would be over. I didn't know how to tell her. Tell her what? That they turned the phone off. We had the name Rowena Telford checked through R&I. We found that the boy's story was true. The woman had been arrested once on a charge of 4127A, LAMC, being drunk in a public place. Irene put in a call to the waitresses union and asked them to check to see if the woman was working any place in town. They came back with the information that the last job she'd held had been six months before and that she'd been fired for insubordination and for being drunk. We showed the picture of the man and woman that we found at the Telford home around the department in the hopes that one of the officers might recognize the place where it was taken. None of them did. The next morning, we had several copies made and we began a search of the bars along Fifth Street. We asked each bartender if he'd ever seen the man or the woman. In the first four places we checked, we got yes answers to the query about the woman but none of the people we talked to could tell us anything about the man in the picture. Two more days passed without results. In the meantime, a warrant had been issued ordering the arrest of Rowena Telford charging her with child neglect. A local and an APB were gotten out on her. On the third day after we'd started our search for the missing woman, we talked with a bartender who was able to give us the name of the man in the picture. He described the man as a fry cook in one of the smaller restaurants down on Fifth Street. We checked the restaurant but we found that he'd been fired on Monday, the 28th of January. A check of his home address gave us no indications to where he might be. Irene and I went back to the office and checked the name through R&I. Joe? Yeah. Can you come up with anything? Check the name, he's registered as a mixed convict. Uh-huh, where'd he fall? Back in Pennsylvania, good time for ADW. Well, we better talk to him, huh? Right now, he looks awful good. Why do you say that? What he was arrested for. Yeah. He tried to beat a woman to death. Yeah. An immediate search was started for the man in the picture with Rowena Telford. From friends of his, we found that we might be able to locate him at a hamburger stand down at Santa Monica. Tuesday, February 12th, police woman Irene Gardner and I drove down to the beach. Should be it up there, huh? Yeah. He's warm in here. Yeah. Would you like to see Willis Thatcher? Of course. Police officers, you're Thatcher, aren't you? Yeah, what do you want with me? A couple of questions we'd like to ask you. Sure, I got nothing. I had no reason to give you any trouble. What do you want to know? You know a woman named Rowena Telford? Why do you ask that? It's a simple question, Thatcher. Can you give us the right kind of an answer? How about it? Yeah, I know her why, what she's done now. When did you see her last? I don't know, a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, I'll let that down, will you? Why? Listen, I think she did I had no part of. We understand you were pretty friendly with her. That's not true. Sure, maybe I had a couple of dates with her, not more than a couple, that's it. And anybody in the world could put up with it for more than that. Why do you say things like that? You ever know her? No, we're looking for her. You? No, I've never met her. That's how come you can ask that kind of question, and if you know her, if you spent any time with her, you had to know what I mean. I suppose you tell her. She's a lush, a real lush, all the time buzzing it up. It wasn't so bad that she got loaded, but she was real loud when she was tanked up, real loud. All right. Sure, check around, ask her friends, talk to them. I'll tell you the same story. Every one of them.  She'd always start in trouble. Sit down, order a drink, the next thing you know, some guy was asking you outside. Well, I ain't built to go outside too often. I get hurt bad when I fight. Uh-huh, does she have any other boyfriend? You don't listen very good, do you? What's that? I told you, and anybody around here had had much to do with it. As far as I know, there wasn't nobody who went with it. How'd you see me the last time you saw her? All right, she had a little hangover. She always had one of those. She seemed depressed about anything. Not that she talked about. All right, did you say anything up in town? Not to me. Listen, how about give me a break and tell me what this is all about? What do you have to report? These fights you told us about. Do you ever have any arguments with Ms. Talbert? I don't think that's any of your business. We're writing it down that it is, now how about an answer? We had a couple of beefs.  Did you ever hit her? We're back to that, huh? What do you need? You know the record, the time I did. You figure maybe I did something to Rowena, isn't that it? You think I hurt her? We're asking you. Well, you're way off the road.  Maybe I had a lot of reasons to want it, but I used to think a lot of Rowena. Awful lot. But that's over. All I wanted to do was leave you alone. Stay away from me. I didn't ever hit her. I didn't hurt her no matter what you think. All right. Believe it. I guess it sounds funny. I ain't trying to fool anybody. I'm ready to admit it. I'm a bum. She didn't have to keep telling me, not all the time. I knew it.  Even if you know it's true. One 47 p.m. We drove the suspect over to his rooming house and we checked the premises. We found nothing that would definitely tie him in with the disappearance of the Telford woman. After leaving his room, we took him downtown where he was held for further investigation on the charge of suspicion of murder. We checked communications, but found it had been word or missing one. Her name and description had been checked through the Files and Missing Persons Bureau without results. Three 40 p.m. Frank came by the ops and said that the trial he was attending was dragging on and there would be a couple more days before he'd be back on duty with me. A petition was filed on behalf of the children charging violation of section 2738, PC, unfit home, asking that he make war to the... Police Marine Gardner put in a call to the next door neighbor of the Telford woman, but we found that there'd been no trace of the missing woman since we'd removed the children. 512 p.m. We finished up the log for the day and we were leaving the office. I got it. Juvenile Friday. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, what's that got? Yeah, mm-hmm. Yeah, sir, we'll be right there. Right, thank you. What do you got? Bar over on East 6th. Yeah? Rowena Telford just walked in. The bartender was one of those that we'd questioned when we first started our investigation. At the time, he knew the Telford woman, but he said that he hadn't seen her for several weeks. On the phone, he told me that she just walked into his bar. Irene Gardner and I left the office and drove over to the East 6th Street address, but the woman had just left. We had her description and a description of the clothes she was wearing. We put that out to all cars in the area, but she was not picked up. Irene Gardner and I went back to the office and we put out a supplementary bulletin on the woman. At 8.14 p.m., we got a call from the woman who'd made the original complaint, Mrs. Crystal Lagers. She told us that the Telford woman had just walked into her own home. Irene and I left the office and we drove out to the house on Vallejo Street. Light on. She may still be home. Yeah. Police officers, we'd like to talk to you. Just a minute. It's about time you got here. You got them yet? I'll make it fine. You got the little brats? They all run off, all of them. Get my hands on them and they're gonna get what for? Where are they? We have them downtown, Mrs. Telford. Why don't you bring them home? Where's the way they belong? I get my hands on them.  Do you mind if we come in? No, come right ahead. You gotta kind of excuse the way the house looks. I've been away for a couple of days. You can see how the kids can mess with the place up. I'm sorry to get frightened. This is Mrs. Gardner. Oh, how you do? Would you like to start? No, that's all right. I'll come here to bring them back. They're being held in juvenile hall, Mrs. Telford. For what? Well, when we found them, they were suffering from malnutrition. This place here, it's not set for youngsters.  The way it is? Yes, ma'am, that's the way it is. Well, you've got your nerve. You really have. What?  We have a warrant for your arrest. Me? Yes, ma'am. Now, you listen.  I know you for what you are, and I'll tell you this. Yes, ma'am, what's that? You better get those kids back here fast. Do you hear me?  I'll take this to any part of the country I have to, but I'm gonna get my kids back. You ain't half as good as you think you are. You aren't playing real planes, so you can understand it.  All right, ma'am, I think that's enough of that. Where have you been for the last two weeks? The trouble thing that would happen to me. I don't know if anybody told me or loved me and said we was gonna get married. I thought, that's what I said. We was gonna get married. I got me, gave Stevie a couple of dollars and told him to take care of things. And then we left and drove all the way to San Diego without stopping. And then we had some lunch on the way to get married. And we had a couple of drinks just to make the food taste better, that's all. Then all of a sudden I got sick again. And he walked out on me. Left me right there in the bar all by myself. And all the promises he'd made to me, all the things we was gonna have. No, all of us, just a lot of lies. Soon as I get a little sick, he just had a couple of drinks. He walked out on me. Left me right there all by myself, you know. All by myself. I didn't have no money. No way to get back. What was I gonna do? I believed him. I really thought he was gonna marry me. I believed all he said, how things were gonna be better. I believed it all. The dirtiest trick I ever heard of. Walk him out on a girl like that.  I got one to beat it. The one you pulled on your children. ROWENA ESTER TELLFORD Rowena Esther Telford was tried and convicted of violation of Section 273APC, Endangering the Life and Safety of a Minor, Which is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year. The four Telford children were made wards of the juvenile court, and were placed in foster homes. You have just heard, DRAGNETT, the authentic story of your police force in action and starring Jack Webb, a presentation of the United States Armed Forces Radio Service.


In 2017, after splitting from her longtime partner, actress Jane Fonda got herself a bachelorette pad in Los Angeles. The former couple sold their eco-conscious Beverly Hills mansion and Jane picked herself up a massive Mediterranean-style townhouse for over $5 million, which is where she still currently lives. From mega mansions to a new Mexico ranch, Ms. Fonda's property collection is quite impressive, and today we're going to take a look. In these videos, we don't reveal any addresses, and even though I've done a house tour of my own place, please do not show up at any private residences because it's not safe for anyone. In 2017, after splitting from her longtime partner, Richard Perry, and offloading their Beverly Hills estate, Jane picked herself up her current home, which serves as the ultimate breezy bachelorette pad. Located in Century City and neighborhood on the west side of Los Angeles, Jane's current three-level home could be considered humble for a Hollywood star like herself. The crib may be labeled as a town home, but spanning 6,679 square feet of space, it's more like a mansion. The actress' home is tucked away in a guard-gated community and residents of the Century Woods Complex have access to a variety of amenities such as a community clubhouse, tennis courts, and indoor and outdoor swimming pools. Jane paid $5.45 million in cash for the 2015 built property, and inside there are four beds and seven baths throughout. The exterior of the tall home is charming with stucco walls and terracotta roofs, along with a fountain out front. Despite the large size of the place, it's easily accessible thanks to the elevator, which services all the floors. The airy and private courtyard out front leads into the entry hall and stairway, where you'll also find the study as well as some of the common living spaces. The formal living room features a fireplace, as well as a wood-paneled ceiling and a gray and white color scheme, and nearby, there's a 12-person dining room. Jane's spacious kitchen and family room are open concept style, and the kitchen is arranged around a large center island with a snack bar, while there's also an extra-serving corner to entertain guests. In the attached family room, both splash couches and opens up to a shaded courtyard. Out on the cozy courtyard, you'll find cream-colored tiles that blend in well, along with plenty of space to lounge. Jane's grand master suite is roomy, with both a fireplace and vaulted ceilings, as well as two walk-in closets and a large private balcony. Her ensuite bath is spa-style, with a glass shower and soaking tub. The house boasts a staff or guest room with bath on the main floor, with two more on the second level, all with their own balconies. Finally, there's an office-media room on the third level that opens to a beautiful rooftop terrace, perfect for checking out the views and taking in that California All together, Jane's mansion-sized townhome provides a light and airy atmosphere with comforting, neutral colors and light woods throughout. Just before Jane bought her current-century home, she put her contemporary Beverly Hills estate up on the market. Following her split from Richard Perry, with whom she shared the mansion, the former couple decided that they would let go of the property they lived in since 2012. Considering Jane and Richard spent $7.3 million on the home and finally sold it for about $8.5 million in 2018, they at least turned a slight profit. The eco-conscious crib was located in the trendy and expensive Trousdale estates. This neighborhood of Beverly Hills is a fancy community stuffed with fellow celebrities. Built in a modern style, Jane's former residence spanned 7,102 square feet of space, with four beds and 6.5 baths throughout. In a video, Jane once said that she instantly knew the Beverly Hills abode was for her the second she drove through the gates and saw the sharp architectural design and shiny stainless steel garage doors. According to the actress, the home simply had taste. Another feature Jane lived inside this home was the kitchen, which opened through walls of glass to a terrace boasting amazing views. From there, you could see the canyon and the mountains, and the views reminded Jane of the Southern California setting she grew up in back in the late 30s and 40s. While the home was built in 1961, it had been majorly remodeled and stocked with updates since then, and the exteriors were decked out in wood siding with stone accents. I was set behind private gates on a lot spending nearly an acre of land, and there were eco-friendly add-ons such as bamboo floors, bioethanol fireplaces, UV thermal glass windows and more. This stainless-deo front door opened up into the entry gallery, which had a dramatic all-glass elevator. I think that elevators seem to be a trend in Jane's properties. The home offered plenty of connected common spaces on the upper level, including a step-down living room with floor-to-ceiling stone fireplace and wall of windows. Jane's home also offered a dining room and a kitchen with walnut cabinets, fancy appliances and much more. This space opened to a small and cozy den. Jane's one-time office was just off of this room, and it boasted built-in bookshelves and windows looking out to the peaceful wood. One of the guest bedrooms, if not more, had its own terrace, while the bright master bedroom had a two-level sitting room, spacious sleeping quarters, double bathrooms and a walk-in dressing room and closet. The lower level of the crib offered hardwood flooring and a media lounge that looked like a music studio, also with a bar and a home gym. This space opened to the private backyard, where there was a covered outdoor lounge with plush furnishings, along with open terraces and a meditation garden with fountain. This solar-heated swimming pool overlooked amazing scenery and there was a nearby viewing platform with a fire pit to catch the best sunsets. Let's not forget that Jane also once owned a stunning ranch in New Mexico, called the Forked Lightning Ranch. This was where the actress once went to escape the Hollywood bustle. She purchased the 1925-built ranch back in 2000 and renovated the property immensely, even building a main Spanish colonial-style main house, dubbed the River House, which spanned over 9,500 square feet of space. She listed her beautiful ranch in 2015 for $19.5 million and sold it in an off-market deal for an unknown amount. This unique property was full of character and sought on 2,300 acres of land just east of Santa Fe, right on the Picos River. It's actually next to Picos National Historical Park and the property is the middle section of what used to be a 13,000-acre cattle ranch. When Jane got her hands on the sprawling property, the only house was a two-bedroom lock cabin where she lived for three years while constructing her custom family mansion. Jane said about her former ranch, the moment I stepped on the property, I knew it was home. Its sheer beauty made my hair stand on end. In the living room, Jane designed the space with a carved wood chandelier that resembled elk antlers as well as a fireplace and a set of French doors. The dining room had towering wood-beamed ceilings like much of the common spaces and another carved and rustic chandelier. The actress wanted to recreate the look of traditional New Mexico ranch homes and it appears that she was successful, adding many of the classic features like adobe walls, a tin roof, antique doors, and more. The home boasted a hand-crafted appearance and feel that also blended with modern features. Elsewhere in the house, there was an upstairs gallery with more antiques on display and Jane's master suite with a headboard she designed herself, a sitting area with fireplace, more wood-beamed ceilings, and a vintage dressing room. So now we've taken a look at legendary actress Jane Fonda and three of her properties past and present. While each of the estates were completely different, we can tell she is quite the eye for real estate and design. Even downsizing to what's dubbed a townhome is still a stylish mansion-sized abode in the heart of LA. Out of the three properties, which did you like best? Personally, I'm a fan of that New Mexico ranch. The design was so thoughtful and unique and it also seemed to be the most warm and welcoming out of the three, but that's just me. Be sure to let me know your thoughts on her homes down in the comments. Thanks for watching. Don't forget to give me a follow on Instagram and tell me which celebrity homes we should look at next. I'll see you all in the next video. Bye.


Live from the Mandalay Convention Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, it's The Cube at IBM Insight 2014. Here are your hosts, John Furrier and Dave Vellante. Welcome back everyone, live here in Las Vegas for IBM Insight. This is a wrap-up day one of The Cube's wall-to-wall coverage here at IBM Insight. It's The Cube, our flagship program when we go out to the events to extract the civil noise. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante, my co-host this week. And we had a great guest. We had Steve Mills on earlier. We had Inhi Chousa, couldn't get her in because we had a celebrity. We had Katie Lindendahl, awesome correspondent for CNN, former ESPN, today's show, she'll be back tomorrow. We had Ray Wang on, we had Analyst. We had a lot of analysis, we had some startups. CataLogic is a hot company, I love that. Jim Kobielus, the big data analyst. Bob Paciano, who is really stellar today. I thought he was on his game day big time. I thought Kirk Bourne was really good too. The astrophysics professor. Frans Dill, who worked at Proctor & Gamble. So we had some heavies on today. I really feel like we accomplished a really good, good program. I think I learned a ton and I was really excited we had some super geeks on who could look back and look at a historical perspective, kind of where we've come from in data, data science, and how it's gone mainstream.  Steve Mills was awesome, just laying it all out there. So very cool, would you? Yeah, the content inside used to be IODs. It's always really good. You get a good mix. I agree, Mills nailed it. I mean, he was very forthcoming, right? He basically said, look, we got slow growth or no growth businesses. He didn't say businesses that are in decline. Many of them are, but that's probably a one time anomaly. He doesn't look at it that way. But it basically was transparent about it. Said, look, we got huge, but delivering billions of dollars, but we're a $100 billion company. So it's going to take some time. I actually, I'm confident that IBM's going to get through this little bump, John. I mean, I've seen it before. IBM's in way better shape now than they were in the last, like, huge transformation. Much, much better shape. Here's why I love what IBM's doing. I'm, as you know, I'm really critical when it needs to be critical. And I am not afraid to lay down some cover fire on that. IBM is not failing, okay? I think Wall Street really is misunderstanding IBM. IBM might need to move a little faster and kind of like, you know, get second gear going pretty quickly on this. But you heard Steve Mills at the end of the conversation. And if you go to, if you're watching this and haven't seen the video, go to YouTube, look at Steve Mills, 2014 insight. At the end, I asked him a specific question about Watson and he went on for a good 15 minutes. He is excited, Dave. He saw his inflection of his voice kicked up. That's a software guy who's saying, this is so exciting. I mean, Steve could say, hey, you know, I'm done at the beach.  You know, he's like, this is super exciting. Then he went on to elaborate on how difficult Watson is to do and how game changing it is. So I think it's kind of an interesting lull right now. IBM's gotten hammered on Wall Street from the whole earnings debacle. And I think that's just a trigger happy Wall Street. Hedge funds kind of figuring out, maybe it's not a sure, is it a long? How do I make the play? And I think- Well, I'd be a missed, you know, when it was a pretty bad missed.  I mean, Wall Street's going to punish you for that. And you know, in Wall Street world, the first disappointment is often never the last. But, so the question is- Never miss a good crisis, right? Well, right, no, I agree. And so that's the point is it's a buying opportunity. It's just a matter of when. It's always hard to time these things. Buffett backs out, so that's interesting. What's that?  Well, you know, I think that you have to put together your investment criteria and make the call. So there are certain things you want to see from IBM. The stabilization of some of those, you know, slower growth businesses, the critical mass of the new businesses.  The thing about Watson, John, is this, there's virtually no competition there. I mean, there will be, but- Yeah, the rich keep getting richer. That was your theme. I really liked that line that you brought up and you had some other good comments. I thought we're fantastic around the same thing. Inflection point, we heard Bob Pichiana really school us on, hey, don't, there's a shift and an inflection point. Know the difference is a nuance. Shift, everyone moves, inflection point, things are happening in parallel. Context computing, okay? Really interesting. And that's inflection point around cognitive. Insight is in the data and versus business process improvement. Speed, we heard from the survey folks. Speed is the number one thing people want, not concept, it's like moving into production. This is the future of IBM, this whole digital world as Ray Wang pointed out. Immersion of augmented reality with Oculus Rift. This is the new game-changing environment. This new software around these new user experiences. And finally, Steve Mills said, it's in the cloud, it's on-premises hybrid in between and there's an evolution around the information technology. And that was key. And at the end though, he said, it's about the CAMs. CAMs, C-A-M-S, cloud, analytics, mobile security, and social, and that is what they're betting on. So, Dave, there it is. I want to talk about the markets where we were riffing on Wall Street. I think that we had the Alibaba top in the market in September and then we come into October and October is always nasty. We're coming to the end of October. In October, you had a couple of misses. IBM missed, there was some disappointment around Amazon. So the street is really confused. So when IBM missed, it took down all these hot companies like ServiceNow, like Workday, like Tableau, and then ServiceNow blew it out of the park. You saw Frank Slootman's announcement. We bet on Frank, Frank's a good bet.  People are really confused about the enterprise. It's like you said earlier today, John, you were right on. The enterprise is hard.  It's really, and complicating things is this bifurcation of you got the born in the cloud, born big data, and you got these legacy companies. But I tell you, I look at this and I say that, as you just said, I said earlier, the rich keep getting richer. It's just a matter of how fast they can transition. And I think these companies are going to continue to do well. They're going to continue to throw off cash. And I like the way IBM's positioned. I mean, I think there may be some near-term pain, but midterm, I really like IBM. I do, I think Wall Street is always trigger happy, but I think the cloud market, I think they lost some margin. There's a cost of transitioning and IBM moving quickly and making the big bets. And then they're moving quicker now, but they're not really shifting, Dave. This is not a deviation. We've been at IBM Edge. We saw IBM Edge in the storage side certainly get transformed. Then you see Impact Pulse, IOD, now Insight. I mean, if you look at what they've done, they've been on a focused mission. Their North Star has always been analytics. Yeah, they've cleaned it up on the execution side, went from concept to vision, execution, tactics. And now you're seeing some meat on the bone. There's a rumored announcement coming on Wednesday. It's supposed to be game-changing. 4.5 on the Richter scale from what we're hearing. I mean, I've been speculating it's something with Cisco. I mean, I don't know if that's the case or not. I do think IBM selling its x86 business to Lenovo opens up the doors for something with Cisco, although indications are it's something else. If we were riffing on Apple, I mean, on the Richter scale, I kind of agree with you. Apple 1.5, 2, interesting, but we'll see. I hope this is bigger. So interesting, I asked Ray Wang a question, pointed question, you know how I get with some of these pointed questions, there's always an underlying sub-question involved. So I want to ask you the same thing. We talk about, I look at what it takes to win, right? Leadership, go to market, that's clean. Certainly, cost wise, cost per order dollar, how you want to look at it, direct sales, indirect sales, an innovation engine, technology leadership, and confidence in the value proposition that customers will buy and you can win with that. So I got to ask you, Dave Wang, let's go down and let's discuss, let's evaluate the leadership. IBM, they're not asleep at the switch. I mean, I think they got muscle. Steve Mills is going to make some moves and I want to see what his bets are. And I think with these larger companies, you have to throw in M&A prowess. I mean, this is one of the things where somewhat critical, more than somewhat critical on with HP is you've got to have M&A prowess. Who's really good at M&A? IBM's really good at M&A. Oracle's really good at M&A. EMC and VMware are really good at M&A. I don't like IBM's M&A, I got to tell you. Why? I love IBM's M&A. Why do you say that? I'm, I like, okay. I like IBM's M&A, but right now I don't like it. And I'll tell you why I don't like it. The market's moving too fast. There are some things, they got to have a horse in the game now as a placeholder, because IBM's got a lot of muscle.  What don't you like? Soft layer? You don't like soft layer? No, I like soft layer. Yeah, I like soft layer. Because you were not really so sanguine. No, that woke me up to that. I was not happy with soft layer. I didn't see the logic there, bare metal hosting. There wasn't certainly no cloud involved, but with hybrid you can argue bare metals of service. It's a natural progression. I can see the progression there. And then I can see the assets coming around. That's not a tuck under, right? That's almost a billion dollars right there. So I think that is what- Think about the big acquisitions at IBM. PWC was a phenomenal acquisition. Cognos, a very good acquisition. 94. Now tell them about within the past five years. Let's stay in this solar system, okay? Okay, Cognos still sort of early 2000s, right? Past five years. No, no, sorry. I take that back. PWC was after 2000, because Carly tried to buy it. But so- I'm not saying do the EMC like acquisitions. A lot of tuck ins, right? A lot of small, little deals. IBM is sort of tight when it comes to acquisitions. They're very tight IRR. So I like their financial, they're a good M&A company. I think that- What don't you like about IBM's M&A? I don't understand. Like they're two small deals. I think I want to see them do bigger deals. I think this tuck under is great from a product standpoint. Look it, here's the deal with M&A. There's two types of M&A's. There's, I need market position. There's three types of M&A's. Market position, pure like EMC. Like I'm going to buy data domain and be a money machine and crank the cash register. Market position and then product tuck unders. Where they say, hey, that's a startup I'm going to pay 50 million, 100 million, 200 million, 20, 30, 100 employees. I like this conversation. So that's, so I said, M&A's one, M&A's one. Now the other is developers, right? Yeah. Okay, so. How would I rate developers? Yeah, with IBM. I think that I give IBM a good position. I think they need to modernize a little bit but they're doing it. I see they got a developer heritage. IBM is a developer heritage. If you go back and look at all the successes in the database side, software, certainly in open source, they've done really well. I think IBM is one of those heavy hitters in the developer community. That doesn't flex their own muscles and I think they're going to do well there. So I don't think there's any. So I would think, I thought you were going to say something different. I thought you were going to say M&A to help development. Maybe I would like to see IBM get more aggressive in the software space, the application software space. I think they're lagging on the developer side on the cloud for sure. Well that's what I'm saying. So what about, I mean Salesforce too big, right? That's too big of a nut to swallow but that would be a blockbuster model. I think Salesforce is vulnerable if IBM could take them out. I mean, IBM has social business. They have a lot of the stuff that's been playing in the enterprise software. If they can move quickly in the cloud developer shift, and this is where I think they need to sharpen the saw on developers as the cloud developers. I think Amazon's winning but I don't think, if Amazon moves to the enterprise before IBM tools up in the cloud, IBM could be in the world of hurt there. So I think if they get the developers in the cloud, social business, they could go instantly after Salesforce and win against Oracle. So if you look at Oracle, Salesforce, around marketing cloud and human capital management, not from a workflow standpoint, I'm talking about engagement standpoint. They could change the game on those guys right there and put a dent in that market in my opinion. Well, and so where IBM should have some developer mojo is with Watson, right? We heard from Steve Mills, you know, the opening up of Watson in terms of developers' ability because you said who really cares about the hardware that's underneath? They really don't care. I think Watson could literally destroy Salesforce. Literally could change the game on Oracle. They could automate their core business and reduce the steps and just decimate and go to the customers with a value proposition of double the performance for half the price. I mean literally that kind of functionality. So Watson is something that if it can materialize in a way that they're talking about with intent computing, context aware, semantic and then cognitive computing, that's a game changer. That will certainly change the dynamics because they can come in and commoditize competition and innovate at the same time. Sorry about cloud. So we think about cloud. You got to talk about Amazon. You know my position on Amazon that they are going to have the volume, the marginal cost of Amazon infrastructure as a service and this whole race to zero. Amazon, Google, Microsoft have the advantage there. Now, a company like Oracle, who's going heavy into cloud, has the additional advantage of pricing power because they own the database and the application. IBM to a lesser extent, but they certainly have database with a lot, they got a lot of SaaS, but not to the extent that Salesforce or an Oracle has that SaaS Mojo. But they could develop that same kind of pricing power in the stack, not could, they have to in my opinion, to be a player. So I think IBM can do it. I think Oracle can do it. HP will see because HP in my view is purely infrastructure as a service and pass, you were just at the HP event the other night. What are your thoughts on HP and cloud? HP's cloud is really, really getting good. I didn't just look under the covers, look at the infrastructure side, but I think it's going to be solid. You know, the only thing I see about the cloud is this whole cloud foundry aspect of it. I'm really nervous that cloud foundry is really they're betting the ranch on. So they're putting all their eggs in one basket with cloud foundry and betting on Paul Moritz. So that is a huge deal for IBM to put everything on cloud foundry. And it's a win for cloud foundry because cloud foundry's federation now increases. So the risk though there Dave, in my opinion, is IBM and HP truly don't have their own clouds. They're buying into a federation transport model. And that's just to me, I would never go down that road. I was a software guy. It's great for EMC and the federation. Great for EMC. Isn't it awesome? It's like a leech around. It's a complete win for EMC and EVMware. How was Pivotal able to pull that off? That's Paul Moritz right there. I think Paul Moritz came in, pulled the Godfather move with, you know, if you look at Paul Moritz, who's never been on theCUBE by the way, I don't know why he won't come on theCUBE.  Joe Tucci's been on theCUBE. Joe Tucci's been on theCUBE.  But Steve Mills, if you think about guys like Steve Mills, Paul Moritz. These are old timers, man. They've been like old timers like us. They've been around the block. They've seen this movie before and they're grandmasters. Imagine Moritz, Larry Ellison, Steve Mills, Joe Tucci in and around a table. What would they do? I mean, they'd just dominate if they were on one team. How about Michael Dell?  Yes, I think Michael Dell, I think Michael Dell. It moves, he made it. If Michael Dell put a posse together, that would be dangerous. And I think, you know, I just don't see his posse. He's got Marius Hoss, where I think he's a hitter. You've got Sam Greenblatt, who's a hitter. You know, if Michael can put those kinds of hitters around him, then it's different damage.  Dell's got the eye of the tiger. He understands how to compete. He understands how to win.  I mean, no doubt. He certainly got complacent over the years, made billions of dollars. But now, taking Dell private to me, I give him a lot of props for that. Yeah, he's not complacent now. Yeah, I mean. All right, well, good day today, John. Dave, start-up community. What's your take on it on the East Coast? What's going on? I think the East Coast start-up community continues to be, you know, in the shadow of the West Coast. I think New York is where the action is. I think that still Silicon Valley, you know, Internet of Things, Cloud, Stas, you know, it's exploding out in Silicon Valley. I can say New York, New York's actually looking pretty good in the developer community. Bits and pieces and pockets coming out of MIT. It's a big day at NYC. What's your takeaway? You guys were down there in New York City. Obviously, we're in an analytic show here. What is the, you know, the Wikibon community now really winning in the analyst market around Wall Street, you know, as O'Reilly Media really kind of goes in and talks to the geeks. Wikibon has really established themselves, Dave, as really the capital market's choice of analysts for it. Well, I think our strategy, John, has always been to focus on the business and the business value and business outcomes, and that's really what we did at Big Data NYC. I think you saw a couple of themes. One is that Hadoop comes to the enterprise, Hadoop meets the enterprise. The enterprise is really coming to Hadoop, so the average age of the folks that are attending things like Hadoop World is going up, and I think that's bringing in disciplines around data warehousing, data integration, the old ETL business, it's mashing together with some of these new ones. I think what you're seeing there, John, is for every dollar that was being spent on the traditional data warehouse and BI business, that's being baseline now, and what I see and what we see in our research is that for every dollar that was spent there, people are spending 30 cents on the new stuff, so it's not a one-for-one replacement, so there's headwinds in the legacy business, and the new business isn't growing fast enough. Now, the bet is the data volumes are going to be so high that that 30 cents in the dollar is going to be more than triple in terms of the volume, so the business will be there, and it will more than offset the softness in the traditional data warehousing business, but nonetheless, that's really what's happening, and so you're seeing that big transition now. The other thing you're seeing is you're still not seeing a lot of software companies that are public or are going to be going public anytime soon. Probably my guess is John Hortonworks is going to be the first. I think you'll see Hortonworks maybe announce an IPO if the market conditions are right before the end of the year. I think they have to start thinking about doing that. It may be MapR too, right behind a Cloudera, as you know, no. And so I think the big data market is still a services-led market. 45% of the revenue in big data is services, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Software's only about 20% of it because so much of the software's open source, so people are still trying to figure out how do I make money in big data, and the answer is by applying big data. It's Uber, it's Fitbit, it's Zipcar, it's Airbnb. These are the companies that are the new value producers in big data. Obviously Amazon, Google, and Facebook are the poster children, but there are many, many others emerging. That's where the money is. That's where the investment thesis, I think, needs to go. How well are these people leveraging this digital matrix that's emerging? Dave, great analysis. Again, what a great day today. We've got a big day tomorrow. Inheach, Vice President, rising star within IBM. She's a CUBE alumni. You probably know her from the multiple interviews we've done. She's awesome. We've got, again, stellar lineup. We've got Carla Gentry coming on, data nerd. She's one of the influencers. And again, we're live here inside the Digital Experience Lounge for the second screen for the people online who aren't at the event and want to get that experience in the moment. This is the CUBE. We're live and we'd like to bring you all the great interviews. Obviously, a lot of influencers out there look for Brian Fonso, variety of others. Veronica Belmont's hosting and her own awesome kind of cool vibe here. She's fantastic. Good to see her and I've seen her in years. And she's just a really great social broadcaster. I really like her a lot, Dave. She's super cool. Of course, IBM's got a lot of coolness going around. So if you're an influencer or a blogger, podcaster, want to do some crowd chats, it's all wide open. Really excited, Dave. Looking forward to tomorrow. So if you're watching tomorrow, you're going to have a lot more action coming your way. Thanks for watching. That's a wrap from day one. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante. This is the CUBE.


Hey, Psych2Goers.  It's completely understandable if you are. It seems like taking care of our mental health has never been harder than in the last few years. In times like these, you may wish you had some magical powers to bring some light into your life, but would you believe us if we told you that you do have those powers in you? It takes the form of a small, simple habit that could change your life forever. It's called gratitude. And if you keep watching, you'll see why it's a magical power. So what is gratitude? Gratitude is an emotion that involves being thankful and appreciative of things that surround you. It stems from the recognition that something good happens to you. You can be grateful for experiences that happen, things that you own, people that are in your life, and so on. By being grateful for something, you're actively acknowledging the good in your life. This is sometimes hard for many people, because we often get overwhelmed with the challenges that life puts in front of us.  By practicing gratitude, you are able to make a much needed shift from that negativity. It may seem like you have to suppress your worries to be grateful, but that's not the case at all. A healthy mind recognizes and accepts the struggles, but it doesn't make the struggles its home. In other words, by being grateful you're able to achieve more balance and make the good more important to you. So how does it work? Let's take a dive into your brain for a moment while looking at a simple analogy. Try to remember a route that you're often taking. It could be a path from your home to school or work, for example. The first few times you took that route, everything was new and unfamiliar, but as time went by and you learned the way, you started moving almost automatically. You didn't have to think about directions or landmarks. You just went straight ahead and in no time you reached your destination. Your brain also has pathways that go from point A to point B. These points represent different brain structures that are in charge of different functions of your thoughts, emotions, and behavior. When you think about something often, you are walking a certain pathway again and again, and your brain is getting familiar with the route of that thought.  If you spend too much time thinking negative thoughts, your brain becomes very good at taking you to negative places because it's learned that route very efficiently.  Those new routes take you to certain brain structures that are responsible for positive thoughts, and that's how gratitude works. When you make it a habit to shift your point of view, you will be more likely to go to those positive places when things get hard because your brain will take you there on its own. 3. What are the benefits of gratitude? When you're grateful, you're acknowledging someone's act as meaningful. You're thanking the other person for whatever you're receiving from them. This helps your relationship flourish and it strengthens your connections with the people around you. It can also show others that you're not the one to take things for granted. On top of that, researchers have found many physical and emotional benefits of gratitude. It's been shown that being grateful is associated with better physical health, life satisfaction, hope and personal growth, self-esteem, quality of sleep, happiness and well-being. So how do I make it a habit? Well it's been said that it takes 21 days to form a habit. So starting today and for the next 21 days, try keeping a gratitude journal. Of course you could just spend some time every day thinking about it, but writing it down could ensure you don't forget to do it, and you'll have it all in one place to reread when you feel like you need to.  Some days you'll have a bunch to write about, and some days you may find it hard. You may think, this day was horrible, how do I find anything to be grateful for? But that's exactly the point. There's always something to be grateful for, no matter how bad our days get. Are you grateful to have a roof above your head? Are you grateful for the clothes that keep you warm? Are you grateful to have access to the internet? As we said before, it's not about ignoring the real struggles of our lives. You are allowed to have a bad day or feel sad. But the world is not strictly black or white, and your gratitude journal is here to remind you that there's a spark of light even on rainy days. You just have to be open to see it. So do you think you'll try out this simple habit? Expressing gratitude and reminding yourself of the good is something small that will work wonders if you're consistent with it. So what's something you're grateful for? Leave a comment to share with other viewers and the Psych2Go team. Did you enjoy this video? If so, don't forget to leave a like and a comment about your own experiences. Share this video with a friend if you think it'll help them too. As usual, all references used are in the description. That's it for now. See you soon.