What's up guys, in this video I wanted to give you a salary guide going into 2024 if you're looking to get a job as a UI UX designer. So all the information I've pulled from Glassdoor, this is the website where you can go on and you can see what companies are paying, it's free. But to get access to the information you need to put your color and salary in. So they have access to hundreds of thousands of people across the country. So they're very, very confident and these ranges are based on real people's data. So I first search for just general UX designer. This is across basically all experience. So what are people being paid today just to get a general idea and it's around 99,000. So this is made up of a base pay which is a base salary, so that's 92. And then you might get an additional pay that might be like a bonus. You might get paid 10% bonus depending on what company you work for. You might get paid health insurance like a car. These bonuses obviously depend on what company you work for. Some companies have a much bigger bonus than others. Banking for example, they have really high bonuses but this is just to give you a rough idea of the range. All the way from 66 to well over 150 will go through in this guide all the different scales and the top paying companies. So let's just start off with a broad salary. So then for a lot of people I know you're interested in becoming a UI UX designer. So you're gonna want a realistic naught to one years experience. This is across all industries and again, that's a really healthy salary of around 78,000. So on the scale but most likely between 64 and 96. And I just think that's a very good starting salary. It's one of the highest in the company and it shows you the value that companies have put on UI UX design. So are there any jobs out there available? I did a quick search on LinkedIn and there's over 13,000. So on LinkedIn, if you go to the top and just type in UX then in the top left there's a tab and you can filter by jobs and then you can actually filter by entry level. So you can see it doesn't just pull in UX it pulls in other things which are similar like UI design, UI UX designer, global digital designer and there's some big companies on there. Look there's Warner Brothers and Nike. So all the top companies are hiring UX designers and you can actually go in there and you'll see what they're looking for and you'll have a look at the pay ranges and they're all very similar to what we just had looking Glassdoor. So there are lots of jobs available. This is very interesting chart. So this is the top paying companies for UX designers in the States and you can see that Google there tops it out and their average pay for UX designers and it is $230,000. Other big companies on there you can see Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Indeed, Bloomberg basically all the big tech companies are up there and you can see how many job openings there are for all the companies but then so it looks like Google is the top of the chart and that's a fantastic salary and you can see why because all the products they make are really user focused again, not surprised to see Apple and Amazon up there. So here's a job I pulled up just to show you this was just a Google one. So this looks like it's an entry level interaction designer for AR. So this is probably working on some of Google's augmented reality things. They're only looking for four years experience but you can see the salary estimation here is around 150 to 180. So that's just an estimation that's based in New York and that's similar to what we've seen before although looking at Google being the top payers this may be real on the low end and you may be able to push this a bit higher but some exciting things to work on in UI UX this year as well with augmented reality and virtual reality. So let's take a look at the career path from what you could expect to earn. So as I said, starting off a junior let's be conservative. Let's say 70 K plus after a couple of years you'll move up to senior then this is where you get over a hundred and very similar to a senior working by yourself just with a bit more pay then you might become a principal which is well over 150, 170. This is where you're overseeing different design teams then a director which is where you're overseeing multiple design teams you're probably line managers for all the principal designers. There, this is like eight years on in your career you're looking at 185 so direct a level might be head of UX for a company for example and then VP, that's vice president and that's for the really, really big corporations where you might be head of UX for America for example for Google and like a very large position indeed overseeing multiple teams and some of these design teams have hundreds of people in them. So then you're looking at well over 200 going up to 300 and the sky's really the limit.


Everybody forest here hoping 22 23 select Premier League for box number four random team style I will show you the re the results right here. There is a link in chat It's a it's a bit of ways back what you can always find them on the website late sports cards comm Scroll down to the bottom click on the results quick link or use a search bar a search bar to find results all the time All right, here we go. It's time It's time Fresh blade on here The ones that Matt has are like greasy like greasy like why I don't like wipe it off There's a whole debacle last night And away we go Silver Sala Liverpool on the terrace level Moe camo for Liverpool Andy Robertson mezzanine That's a thick sleeve that shouldn't go in That is to 199 Do all numbered in this Yeah, we're off we got tri-color Kula Bali Chelsea and a Select stars Ilan Mellier. That's some good TV on tonight. I hope Kula Sevsky on the jersey card for spurs and It's like future Cole Palmer Man City Silver rookie terrace level Matthias Nunes The wolves and a Leno pink terrace level to 99 for pull them pull them house Got taco fall on the other night. I was the first like what? anyone likes y'all We tweeted out silver mezzanine James Justin Lester City Mason Mountain stock Sorry guys Make this tweet it out There's a red Zaha on the field level Crystal Palace Reds are non-numbered Silver terrace level Anthony Robinson Fulham and an orange mezzanine Malcolm Ebi oe rookie Crystal Palace to 75 Ebi oe Leon Bailey red mezzanine as a villa Solange Jamie Vardy on the auto Jamie Vardy Lester City auto here Hatch our pitch side signatures Kula Sevsky select stars Big parallel come on Well, that's a big parallel. There's a tricolor Lewis cook born myth on the terrace level and a gold Is Maxwell cornet to 10 West Ham terrace level? Very nice gold First one that I've uh that the first goal that I've seen we've ripped the whole case as I didn't see one gold It's been bought man. Nice one here to 49 on the auto for a new castle it's been bought man Flynn downs good way to end the first box of the gold and a Solid auto with the bauhtman Red tavernier rookie on the on the terrace level for Bournemouth and Spurs Kula Sevsky purple field level to 135 nice good ending that box for sure started off not the best But it ain't over till it's over. I think Lane's actually gonna get fortnight. I think you might fully on Alvarez Ricky base you got it Anthony a longa jersey card man you about our bio Got silver terrace level Gabriel Jay Zeus arsenal and a Jesse Linn guard camo for a forest to 225 terrace level No, I'm not speaking the third person. That's just what they're called Silver mezzanine Scott McKenna for Nottingham Forest Gavin Bizzou knew select future Anthony a longa on the auto man United It's like future only say Crystal Palace Silver Declan rice field level West Ham Unstoppable Christie Louise Diaz. Oh, we got a zebra coming up. There's a red Aaron Hickey terrace level for Brentford and a zebra is a Fabio Carvalho Field level rookie Liverpool 23 of 25 what a hit This is going to George Y Great card great card Something else right there man. Oh Yeah, that's going in the bag. Oh, yeah, that's a beauty as I didn't ask the biggest car We pulled out of the case in a couple blocks of grip so far silver Anthony terrace level for Manu purple mezzanine as I'm about a co-chop source to 135 or Southampton so sick You guys think man city have it locked up or it can arsenal come back and get it Terrace blue you go Lori Spurs equalizers Alexander Isaac Yeah, I think I think Man City's got locked up Who do you think is do you think anyone else is gonna break in the top four is it gonna be is the top four set? Silver Mason Mount terrace level Chelsea orange Ferguson rookie from Brighton is 75. I Think I think the top four is also said I think Champions League is Already all set and done for EPL Red mezzanine Ben White Arsenal Rico Henry Yeah Spurs don't look very good liver puller too far out of it Yeah, man you how many how many points are man you ahead of the fifth fifth place? Okay, go into on man man city on the auto here. Sorry Steve Chelsea won't at least I mean Chelsea can be out They're like, okay, they're playing better. It's still not great You just got a hope for next year Holland base Red Tyler Adams leads on the terrace level and it's high die Kastaniya Lester City 40 of 49 terrace level nice Kastaniya four points. Hmm Yeah, man, they've been pretty good recently Their goal differential is what could hurt them I guess silver terrace level Maxwell Cornetta if it gets dicey Jolenton purple mezzanine to 135 Newcastle nice asking about that's a team that I should I should have worn my My kit today. That's the team that I've been rooting for. I hope they stay up to all random for a new team next year But I hope they stay up Tri-color st. Maximon Newcastle They've been looking better the past the past two or three matches. So hopefully they can just keep that up and Just you know I get relegated Kai Havertz the 35 on the Jersey card tie-dye. Is that the 35? 25 excuse me the 25 Kai Havertz Chelsea equalizer Solanke Yeah, Newcastle Arsenal that'll that'll decide a lot too. I'm just gonna bring up the table See what we got Because I don't know outside of I don't know that the literal You know the point differentials here. Yeah, liver liverpool is four back Brighton is Eight back. Yeah Brighton's on the not not not the not the best of stretches all also Silver Erickson terrace level pink tavernier rookie for Bournemouth to 99 Like they've been okay, they've they've they're all right, but catching up. I don't think it's gonna happen But hey man, good for Newcastle. What a season Erling Hollands silver Mazzanine Tiago Silva Yeah, forced I think nottingham Forest has to win Monday. That's like they're they gotta get I think three points And they're probably safe after that Red terrace level Kimare so at least takes a lot of the pressure off the Newcastle there and a camo field level Suicheck there's a big dent in this unfortunately It's out of 190. There's a big dent right here We'll send a box to West Ham. Sorry about that one Yeah, it is shamed it is a little better Silver Emmy Martinez for villa terrace level camo. He John Wong. It's a 199 mezzanine They have a Southampton so like Southampton is definitely the because it's not easy after that They got Chelsea then Arsenal then they have crystal palace. So like Yeah, the Southampton one is a big one You got you got to get three points against a lot against the team at the bottom, you know It's tricky down there right now at the bottom of the table. Nice Vasa tits rookie red for Liverpool mezzanine Glendowns Fabinho with a redemption is Dwight York. He is Dwight York Brighton See West Ham villa villa Aston Villa On the pitch side signatures Premier League villa Try color egg deer for spurs and camo rookie. Give a rice terrace level New castle to 225 as Anderson Fowler auto there. You'll leave Robbie Fowler and Nunes Try color field level for Brighton is McAllister One again guys calls live on drip right now. Just the moment here Guys a link if I need to So select La Liga as a next break we got to get filled up It's down to just one actually so I'll just give you guys link for triple threads again tend to go Teared full case triple threads. Oh This zebra. Sorry Blake. That's a Carvalho Fabio Carvalho to 25 Sorry, I thought you were asking who Nottingham Forest was playing On Monday, I'll find a way to watch that while I'm breaking silver terrace all the royal hymns wolves purple Lavia South Hampton rookie mezzanine to 135 Silver terrace level Tarkovsky for Everton and a Marquinhos rookie Camo mezzanine to 199 Our snow with the Marquinhos We got number Marquinhos rookie. Yeah, we're gonna watch this out this game I'm not sure who's gonna win red Callum Wilson on the Terrace level Newcastle Brandon Johnson field level rookie for Nottingham Forest for fauna Chelsea Jersey card Wesley for fauna Saliba select future Saliba Silver terrace level bazoonu Southampton Orange Bruno you go man you to 99 terrace level. I it'll be close to the last game I think Celtics take it again though with MB not being totally healthy. I just I don't see how like It goes any differently silver mezzanine Miko Lenko Everton tricolor field level of Jarrod Bowen for West Ham and a Pink unstoppable a rebo rookie Southampton to 25 tricolor is a Lloyd Kelly Bournemouth terrace level and What is dude? What is going on? Bobby Oak are value a white prism field level 14 of 20 liverpool That's unreal That is unreal tricolor graylish mezzanine for man city Jacob Ramsey select future Peter Schmeichel Legendado right there for man you Peter Schmeichel one of the best keepers to do it one of the best Premier League keepers tricolor Raul Jimenez Wolves terrace level Maddie cash terrace level camo to 225 Villa No, this is this is a yeah, they are from the same case Shane Gold you have some auto man United There's some of the names you see in this you just don't see in other products ten out of ten Craziness here. I say What a stomp up to these days He's a manager, right? All the defenders become managers. Well, that's not the right attitude to have Recap time. All right numbered cards. We add a lindgard cash Him ares Robertson Marquinhos each on wong a Soy check that soy check did have damage on it. We're sending a box to West Ham Box and wrapper seem to try to get it replaced purples now of Kuleszewski Bella Kouchap Jolentyn la via pink leno Tavernier orange Bruno Fernandez Abio a Ferguson tie dye of castanet pink Arribo insert gold cornet a Dwight York Redemption for Aston Villa There Aston Villa Got relics up of Fauna Havertz Ilanga Kuleszewski, sorry Schmeichel Otto. That's Peter Schmeichel Robbie Fowler Elk I go into one Ilanga Vardy some bottom into 49 gold Stam Man you Not expect to see his auto in this pretty neat though pretty neat and then two Carvalho's Rookie field levels white to 20 and zebra to 25 unreal and that'll do it. Thanks again everybody on to the next one


Hi everyone from the national. I'm Joe for jazzy's case breaks calm coming at you with another break of 2022 tops tier one baseball 12 Box pick your team number five Big thank you to we don't have a printer here at the national big thanks to this group though for making it happen See Joe Pizzle with that last spot mojo star next to his name. You got the Royals Looking to Bobby with junior a little national mojo for him And here's the other half of the list right over there Thank you everyone for picking your team. No fillers all straight up Remember every spot you purchase big or small right a lot or a little all of those count for the national promo Check out the details check out the grand prize that we're given away. I think you'll be pretty impressed So again big thanks everybody here for getting in on the action See if I could keep this all in one page here. Is that close enough? All right Now oh, I don't have that button to switch screens. I got to do it on the broadcasting software. There it is So thanks everybody who got in there's the case reserved for your YT for YouTube Thanks everyone for joining us Live at the national appreciate it Empty box so you can see all 12 boxes are right there Thanks everybody for getting in appreciate it My apologies, we do not have top loaders. We order top loaders. We thought they're gonna be here today But hey, this is how traveling going to away games. This is what happens sometimes So we should have those by tomorrow But we're gonna sleeve all these up carefully Store them carefully. So you'll be all right Jonathan what's going on? How are you? Hello from the national. All right first one out of the gate 236 out of 399 Chris sale piece of his jersey poor Chris sale Like just got off the aisle Just cut off the aisle and then like got a comeback or to the pinky That'll be for Jonathan and the Red Sox You got Larry Walker 173 out of 199 299 game use Jersey going to the Rockies that will be for Colorado that is Mac Mac McCarthy with that one nice autos Nice Marcus Simeon 5 out of 25 Gold ink autograph for the bluebirds That is Austin with the blue jays and the other autograph another blue jade 15 out of 125 Vlad Guerrero, Jr. There you go Austin to the Giants Hey, hey, Bill. How's it looking out there? Adam, how's it looking out there? busy a lot of people nice Really Wow I do I just realized it hasn't been on the weather east coast in like a number of years, so All right, will the thrill 205 at a 299 piece of his lumber From my rivals the Giants that's gonna go to Go to Harrison the Giants The autographs we got old Cecil fielder tier one talent 003 out of 299 that is for Ryan Heinz and Detroit and over here Wow John and Kent saying pull me some Red Sox magic. How about a one-of-one? Jaren Duran Duran, do you have any 75s over there? Just need one for this one-of-one There it is one-of-one Jaren Duran Duran Nice rookie Otto young sir Hopefully hopefully finishes this season strong. I don't have my bell with me But all aboard the Big Hit Express There we go got some fans. Thank you Appreciate it. What's your name Trent? Thank you, Trent. Hey, whenever you're ready. We'll be here Yeah, hey, no worries appreciate it Yeah, I think that was box two right because it's a third box. Yeah box two That's pretty nice 34 out of 399 Joey Vado piece of his jersey Hear that guy back in the background there. He loves that train whistle. He heard it. He was ready Vodomatic for the Red Legs. That's gonna be for Howard. We got another one for the Red Legs Tony Santolin 202 out of 299 and the other Otto nice another one for Jonathan Jim Rice 213 out of 299 so you got a little bit of the The old school a little bit of the new school. All right next box got camera angles here folks, but that's part of the national Well, you got Nolan Aronato 227 out of 249 piece of his jersey Piece of his jersey for the Red Bird that'll be for Ryan Got a dust in May 22 out of 299. He should be back in action soon I hope That's for my Dodgers Carl My boys in blue there you go Carl and we've got an Austin Riley 236 out of 239 299 for the Bravos Carl with the Braves. He's heating up. All right next box here in Picotine number five Thanks everyone for getting in there's mookie bets 192 out of 199 for the Dodgers another one for Carl.  I feel like he was Released and picked up by somebody See let's see if my memory serves me right On her Rondon was acquired off of waivers from the Cardinals. Oh, it was designated for excitement on the 26th but anyway That'll go to the Cardinals that's gonna go to I Think Ryan Hines had the Redbirds. Yeah, there you go And the other auto is the Hawk Andre Dawson 115 out of two 115 out of 125 Of course expo stuff goes to the Nationals Lonnie with the with the Nats All right next up the relic is Clayton Kershaw Carl with my Dodgers 32 out of 249 Got a cool wit Maryfield 285 out of 399 It's for Joe P. And the Royals last spot mojo Maybe we'll find his teammate in here somewhere The auto is Manuel Rodriguez 93 out of 299 for the Cubbies Speed for Jeremy and the Cubs and then we got a Steve Carleton nice 23 out of 175 local guy But it's about an hour or so away Phillies who's got the fight and fills that will be for Rob and the Phillies Passed by their stadium on the way into Atlantic City the other day You got the kid Ken Griffey, Jr. 35 out of 199 Ryan of what? We got a Charlie Barnes 158 out of 299 rookie auto for Minnesota That's gonna go to John in the Twin Cities and we got an Astro 258 out of 299 that is gonna be for I think yeah, King D and the Astros Got a Dylan Carlson 201 out of 249 Welcome King Dave appreciate it Ryan in the Cardinals We got Jake McCarthy 195 out of 299 That is for Andrew in Arizona We've got oh a big Mac Mark McGuire 60 at a 75 Jersey and autograph Ryan Heinz Arizona Cardinals ooh a button coming up You see the autos first Or should we see the let's just see the button We've got Derek Lee two out of five piece of his button Game used Chicago Cubs That's Jeremy with the North Siders Alan reminding me not to forget about the South Siders I'll try not to we got some got a few boxes left And out of five I don't have the bell, but I do have the train whistle Jeremy all aboard the Big Head Express I say Arizona Cardinals Yeah, the jet lags getting to me Yeah, Luke Luke Williams 116 I did sleep a lot too, but it's the brain's a little foggy right now All right, use the force Luke that will be for Ryan Heinz and the Cardinals he's on fire And the straw man Darryl Strawberry 103 out of 199 More to go 295 out of 399 Logan web Logan web giants Harrison, San Francisco. We got Max Crannick 005 to 299 Taking it to the max Crannick Tyler with the Pirates and Goldie Paul Goldschmidt gold in Godograph 4 out of 25 St. Louis Cardinals Ryan Heinz. He's on fire Uh-huh Is he who's pretty important day for those standing cup teams? Well, yeah, I was gonna say those that trio has to go It's a king's decision, it's not stable They have to I would just do all three at once Cobra cars not retired yet. That's why oh Kobe Not I said Copey. Oh There's Harman Killibrew 21 out of 99 he said his lumber going to the Twinkies He's got the twins John does serenity. Yes.  Maybe we'll have a little more time to chat So that's to win that's for John and we got a Zach Wheeler 358 at 399 the wheel in the sky keeps on turning Okay, nice. Yeah, it was nice meeting you. Thanks for starting. I didn't realize you're gonna be by that's awesome Phillies by the way that Wheeler goes to Rob Lucas Geolito.  We got the Boz Shane Boz 137 out of 299 raise Tampa Bay That's James And Tampa Bay Final box here in figure team five. Thanks everybody for making this happen. Got more in the store. We can do it tonight All right, he has a money grand all 10 out of 349 With a white sock for Alan Murdock and the final two autos we got Marcus Strowman Mets edition 221 out of 299 That will be for Ryan Lynn the Metropolitan's and last but not least It's mmm beer Seth beer 142 out of 299 Rookie auto for the Arizona baseball diamond backs going to Andrew and the snakes and there you go ladies and gentlemen I'm Joe for jazby's case breaks calm Thanks for watching. Thanks for breaking with us live from the National. I appreciate it. I'll see you next time For the next break. Bye. Bye


Okay. In this next segment, we're going to introduce you to functions. Functions are where all the magic happens in R, so it's exciting to get here. We're going to start out just as we have in previous sections by creating a new section using our hashtags. I call this section functions and arguments. Don't worry, we'll introduce these terms, explain more we meet by them shortly. You can think of functions as canned scripts. These are lines of code that other people have written and basically stored those in an object. So just as in the previous segment, we created variables stored values. You can do the same thing, storing operations, calculations, that sort of thing. So you can easily use those tools in the context of your exercise. So these have already been stored in either the tidyverse package or the base R set of tools. And I'm just going to go ahead and introduce you to some of the basic ones. The first one we're going to try out is a square root. You type in sqrt followed by parentheses. You can throw a number in here, like 16, run that, and we're going to get the output for. Again, we could store the output of that calculation in a new variable if we wanted to, just by again using the assignment operator here. And as you see, the new variable B is creating our global environment with the value for another really common function that you'll be using is round. That's exactly what you'd expect. It takes the number with multiple decimal places and basically rounds that to the number of places that you indicate. So you can imagine we have high here, rounded to five decimal places. If I run this just for the default, it rounds it up to the nearest whole number of three. Here's something kind of special about these functions that now is a good opportunity to introduce you to, which are arguments. If I wanted to basically customize the output of this function to do something very specific. So instead of rounding the nearest whole number, say round to two decimal places, I can do that using additional arguments. And you separate different arguments within a function using a comma. And you can actually see that as I'm writing this, R is giving me a pop up saying what the arguments that this function takes. So the round function is given here with the number. And then you can give the second argument, which is optional, which is digits equals zero. So if I write here digits equals two and run this, well, now the output, it gives me is going to be 3.14 rounded to do two decimal places. Now you can do the same thing without actually writing digits equals two. Because there are only two arguments being recognized by this function, R just assumes that their second argument is giving the number of digits. As long as your different arguments are in the exact same order as the formula is kind of designed or written, everything runs fine. Where you might run into issues is if you reversed the order. So if instead of having my pie followed by two, I had two by pie. Well, now it's not going to give me the right output. It's going to try basically, in this case, actually it's not even recognizing this as an argument and it's just rounding to the default setting of the nearest whole number. Okay, now on the other hand, if I was to write digits equals two, followed by pie, well, now it understands what I'm trying to do. I've just reversed the order of the arguments. And it's going to give me the expected output pie routed to two significant digits. And likewise, I could do zero significant digits and get back to that default of nearest whole number. So as you can see, there's a lot going on with functions, and it helps sometimes to go to refer to the documentation for these functions to understand both what arguments it takes, what the kind of significance of each of those arguments are. And so the way that you can kind of dig deeper into these functions is using the question mark. If I was to type question mark followed by the function name with or without the parentheses, by the way, then in my bottom right window here in the help tab, the documentation for that round function is going to appear here. And so you'll see here that round is part of the base art package. So it tells you what library or, you know, set of tools that this belongs to. It talks about what it's used for. And also the arguments that it takes and how those arguments should be understood. Okay, it also tell you if some of these arguments are optional, or if there's a default setting, what that default is set to.


Welcome to Traffit TV, it's the Premier League show, there's been no Premier League action this weekend, it's been glorious, we're not talking about international football because that's why, but over on the last fan standing this week, there's been discussion in Premier League partnerships and who is the greatest of them all, so let's see what they've got to say. We've had together the combination, the goals that they scored, and not only that, we're talking about different people here, but Colin Yor did it all, won all the marbles in the same season. Now you might want to talk about how Cain and Son have got better statistics or something like that, but unless you do it together when it matters, there's no point, and Colin Yor did it together when it matters. One of the most underrated English strikers about in Andy Cole, he was doing it in Europe, then when you look at the teams that those boys tear the part, obviously in the Premier League they did it, but then you look in Europe as well, against the defences of Juventus, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, these boys were tearing them off. Mm, Yorch yn Cole. That was a good one. That was a fantastic partnership, Yorch yn Cole, because Manchester United had, obviously, sharing them, and they had four unbelievable strikers, but that partnership was just, that was the real partnership, and that was the go-to partnership. Obviously, a member of the semi-final interested in for the Champions League, it was unbelievable. What a game that was. Didn't they just score that goal in Barcelona? They were just on the same wavelength, they made things look so simple, and it was just a joy to watch, and it's something you don't really see in the Premier League too much anymore. We don't have partnerships because we don't play 4-4-2 or something like that. Obviously a lot of teams play 3 now, and maybe you can go, well, you say 2, I mean you look at some like Tottenham, I mean you talk to Sonny, Kane, and that kind of come on to that, but there are still partnerships, but these were real partnerships with, when football was slightly different. When I was a lad, it was all about playing 4-4-2, it was all about those partnerships, and that's always been a big thing in football, and it's quite sad actually that's gone out of football, but it has changed now, it has changed, but Yorch yn Cole, we're absolutely phenomenal, and a big part of why Manchester United got the treble at you. It was also obviously, I think Lee mentioned in the thing, there was Bayer Camping on me, they were brilliant, it was way because both of them almost dropped in and picked up all up, and Bayer Camping was like more of a number 10 on me, it started wide and was like a modern day strike. But what was interesting about that is, it obviously started out with Bayer Camping right, and they were a really good partnership as well, I mean anyone who played with Bayer Camping was going to be good, but it was unreal, and you're right they both wanted to pick it up deep, but I think Bayer Camping right was a proper number 9, and Bayer Camping was a proper number 10, and that's what helped start the evolution, and then on re came into it, and they got, that helped get more out of it. So to writing is sort of final years at Arsenal, but there's been brilliant, like Bayer's Lee and Cole, when Newcastle, when they came up, you know, Strachwell Airsea and Vellios, very underrated, very underrated, could have blossomed into something. This day together in Jules, who knows, who knows, could have talked about Evan winning all sorts back in the day, but you write those partnerships, they have kind of moved away because the way football has changed, and it is sad in a way, because it was always about the two strikers, getting goals, and I think some teams suffer because they don't have to, you put the ball in the net on a regular basis the way you're at it back in the day kind, I think the football, like you say, has evolved. More often than not, you have wide strikers as well. What's funny about it, you know, just before we move on to some more is, what's funny about it I think is, we talk now in terms of like the stats of the game and where to be in teams as, you know, XG and XA and all these kind of things, but football when it was, when we played 4-4-2, we had two up front. It's funny how the things we talk about now pressing is another big thing. It's like these things were invented, they just had new names now, and those things were there, and the thing going back to XG and XA is that when you're a partnership, it was normally like a big and a little wasn't it, or a 9 and a 10, just dropping off a little bit, is that strikers instinctively when they were in partnership knew where to run, so one would go near post and one would go far post, and that's the thing, it's like that's where you talk about XG and XA. And that thing of like, if you make certain runs and we put the ball in certain areas, you'll score goals, that's a big part of those stats now, the zones and stuff, and that used to be instinctive because one would go to the near post and one would go to the back post, and a winger would always know that if you put the ball into the box in one of those areas, one of those strikers would always be there and someone would always get an opportunity. And that's what's funny about football is like, it's tried to reinvent itself with using certain terms and saying, you know, but a lot of it is emperors new clothes, a lot of it is just recycling and stuff that we used to see when we were younger, when as a striker you would listen to any striker who played in the 80s and the 90s and they'll say to you as a partnership, you always knew where to run because you always knew where the other one was going to be, or if the other one had already made that run then you'd make a different one. And it would give wingers so many options. I mean, I don't know whether it's up there, but Sutton and Shearer made a part. What's dead interesting? We'll have a look at the graphic because these are the buy goals, buy stats, these are the best partnerships that we've been to. So, we've got obviously Cain and Sun at the number one, they broke the record last week, they're 37 goals, made three to the drog byr yn Lampad. Is that a re? It's not a part, I'm not having that. It's who made the goals, so this is the stats, Eguero and David Silver, he's again not a partnership but they made it. Obviously, Omri and Robert Pires, so interest in that Pires and Omri made more goals for each other, Darren Anderton and Teddy Shearingham. See a lot of them, I'll dispute a few of them because they are not partnerships. What they are is a lot of them show how we moved away from 4-4-2, but they are not partnerships. No, that's a slightly separate, I think like Cain and Sun because they play in a three, I think you could argue that you're a partnership. But going back to what I was just saying, there was someone like Blackbeam, Blackbeam under league by having two strikers who were good in the air and two wingers who would put the ball in certain areas. And that was a partnership and you might see to me that's a proper partnership because those forwards knew where to be and knew where the other one was going to be. And there are two wingers who put the balls into the box and it meant that you always had someone in the right areas. That's a partnership to me, doesn't matter who crossed it. Crossing is part of the game, it's somebody's job to do that. That to me is not like, I wouldn't applaud someone for putting a cross into the box. I think the centre forwards and this is obviously, some stats can't really show this is that a true partnership is shouldn't be who passed the other one. It's who makes the runs, it's getting deeper into it and I do think that, I mean some of them, they're nonsense, Teddy Shearingham. No, but they're goals are creative. No, it's the most goals created and that's why people are. Well yeah, when we talk about partnerships and obviously as Adam was saying there, like Joach and Cole, that was a proper partnership.  Because it's hard to define isn't it? Because Teddy Shearingham might be scoring the goals there, I find it. But Les Ferdinand's making the alternative run and it's all those things that you can't, that they're like really basic stats. But if you went deeper into that, you'd find out that Les Ferdinand made a decoy run. Or when Ferdinand and Sharpe put together a new castle, same thing again, cross, cross, cross. You know, Keith Gillespie on one side. Do you know that on the other side? And you know you keep putting that ball in the box, it's either going to be Ferdinand or Shearingham. And because there's one taking a defender away and the other one's got, hey, that's a partnership to me. It's not who put the ball in the box, it's that stage job. When you think you're a partnership there is linking up with your state partner isn't it? It's like you two would go out on the pitch and be like, we're doing this today. I always played in the two or whatever. You'd be like, I'm with, we're these. You know, I'll go where you pressed it on all of that. And it's all the intangible stuff, the stuff that isn't coming down on stats and going really linked with him and all that. And that is, we have moved away from that. Because obviously, if you look at it, like Manai and Sally for Liverpool have got a lot of goals, haven't they? But people wouldn't say they're a partnership. They're in a front three. For me, no pulse people out. For me, no does arguably the most important job at times for them. And yet he wouldn't be considered. It is mad the way football has changed. And now, yeah, twos have become threes or just one. But if you're talking about statistics, then Sun and Kane are the best. What's good about that is though, they are pretty much nearly a proper partnership. So that's fit.  But also they are both forward. So it isn't that thing of like, and it and throwing crosses into the box and Sally saying, that's nonsense that. Like that's a prop. So there's a genuine evolution there of a real partnership. Sometimes I don't know who plays it too. But that is a real evolution. But you look more than a witness like, is the goals they've got then as a partner. Cos that's how I always looked at a partnership. Like a partnership with me and you were up front. I've got 20. You've got 20 if you're like, what a partnership.  And that partnership was, they were always scoring goals, but they were always, you know, moving, moving into different space to allow the other one. And then, you know, you've got Beckham on one side and you've got Giggs on the other. And it's the way that they knew instinctively. They weren't both big fellas, but they did score a lot of head of goals. But it meant Beckham and Giggs always had a target because one would run post, one would pull off and then Scheringham would come on and he'd, what Scheringham was brilliant at was Scheringham actually didn't engage the space. He stayed in the space. He let other people move and he stayed and then people learned his game. And that to me is a real partnership. That to me is, that to me is something that's gone out of the game and I understand why tactics have changed. But that old fashioned real partnership of knowing where someone else is going to be instinctively is was a real, you know, something that was around in football for 50, 60 years. It's only gone out of the game in the last 10, 15 years. It was something that always, as we were growing, was such a big.  So, you know, you'd look for a partnership there, Adams and Brozier or Adams and Armstrong. She said that space one is probably the most modern one out of it all. You know, it still, it still holds onto the traditions, but obviously it's changed as well. But then at the same time, what's interesting is, you know, that some of those, some of those graphic, put that graphic back on 4, isn't it?  The two space ones are not successful. That's what's interesting. One's top, one's fifth. There's no success there, which is really interesting. The other three, of course, did have success. But it's just, that's an interesting part. Lampard, isn't it? No, no, but it, but we know, we know that that's the way they play. They played one upfront. Lampard was the free role. But it's not. But it's just interesting that the both space ones never got gained any success from it. So, yeah, very interesting. I think, and obviously from that then, when you look at it like that, the game has moved on. But Harry Kane, who is top there, him and some, he's developed unbelievably well, hasn't he? Yeah. And another, another discussion point on this week's last fan standing list. Who's the better England striker? Harry Kane or Wayne Rooney? And Harry Kane is exceptional. He really is. He's brilliant. He's developed later than Wayne Rooney. He's had a different, different path to get to the top.  Wayne Rooney, more natural for me, on the zone, from 16, you know, doing it. So I would, I pan, he's obviously England's all-time record, goal scorer Manchester United's all-time record. But he won't be full on the goal scorer. Well, at this moment, that's a time of discussion. But he won't be full on the scorer. Yes. But I just think, for me personally, I think Rooney's a better player. But I think Harry Kane's a better England player. I do personally. I think he's a better England player. I think he scored more important goals than Rooney did. Rooney barely scored past his first Euros in a tournament. It never clicked for him, mostly because of injuries. But it never really clicked for him. He's an important player. I don't think he's the only leading goal scorer, but Kane will take that off him. And I just think Kane plays in a better England team, as well. It's a better England team. And also, do you think what Kane is? Kane plays the same position he plays for his club that he does for his country. Rooney never. Rooney played up front for England, and then went and played for Man United everywhere. And I think he thinks the better footballer. Well, Rooney, Rooney's more natural talent, much better. But I think this can augment just like the same with Messi and Ronaldo. Ronaldo is a much better international player than Messi is, but Messi is just a better player, far as I'm concerned. But Ronaldo is a better international player. Because when it comes to the crunch, when you've got those two games or that tournament, Ronaldo is always stepped up. Messi hasn't quite because Messi is relies, not relies, but he brings other people into the game. And he hasn't always had that arising, Tina, where Ronaldo is the type of fellow who has got the ego and the presence to step up at that one moment. And that might just be an amazing header of a set piece or a penalty. So I didn't listen. For me, Rooney is much better footballer, but for England, I think Kane will get that record. And listen, what I would say about Kane is we're going into the World Cup and England have got a genuine chance of winning the World Cup. They're not favourites, but I think they've got a genuine chance. And like the Euros, it's Harry Kane. And look at the Euros, the way in the Euros where Harry Kane didn't start well, didn't look fit, played his way into the tournament and started scoring goals. By the end, it was an important figure. And I don't think Wayne Rooney ever quite did that. Wayne Rooney's the injuries he took into tournaments, never allowed them and then he's seen what the documentary about him.  I just think Kane's going into his peak in a World Cup this year and people genuinely will go, you can win as the World Cup. I don't think Wayne Rooney passed maybe his first World Cup 2006. I don't think anyone after that really thought Wayne Rooney was going to win a World Cup for England because they don't think he had the people around them to do that. Pass 2006. I think 2006 they were all in the peak. I think 2010 they were all not on the wane, but just as a team it was a bit more of a transition. They were coming out of that golden generation. 2014 they didn't get up the grief to 2014. In 2010 we beat them didn't we, when Lampard had the shot and it went over the line, but they ended up getting me 4-1. I think Rooney had to carry a lot of very, very average players. Wayne's Kane's got a good team around them and of course that's going to make you a better player. And Rooney just, as I say, every tournament something wasn't quite right and yet his first tournament, what could have been? 2004 in the Euros. It's a good point Kane, me well be at that level. Me well be the one who actually does something for England where Wayne didn't. I remember having this kind of discussion over Robbie Fowler and Michael Owen and it was like who would you rather have in your England team. And it was Michael Owen, but who would you rather have in your Premier League team was Robbie Fowler because Fowler was the better player. Left foot better finish him on that. Lister and pace and was clinical, but for England really good where Fowler was one a bit like Ian Wright another one a bit like that. When he played for England not quite the same, but the club level is devastating. And yeah maybe. And he was like Leighton Baines? Yeah, very much like Leighton Baines, but maybe that's what it is, isn't it? That you just need a little slightly different. I'm Stephen Gerard, what an unbelievable footballer. Paul Scholes, unbelievable footballers, Premier League, just different players. There's a lot of that that comes down to the managers and the press and people having the bottle to play the team they want to play. Because what has happened in the last three or four years, no it's like five years now isn't it? Gareth Southgate has got the bollocks to play the team he wants, to drop who he wants, to pick who he wants. Doesn't give a monkey's, we've seen that this week England have played people bool Manly McGuire after the games come out and on. What he is doing? This is supposed to be. We've worked really hard to change this England set up so that it's about getting the most out of these young lads, blocking all the, getting rid of all, making sure all the people in the media are not going to come in and cause trouble. And usually come in the match booling one of the players who scored really important goals in well cups and stuff. And I think that's massively important to get that, so the players are like, this fella, I want to play for him, I want to play for him. The whole thing has changed for England where people go, yeah I actually don't mind this England scene now. Lads who've seen all good lads and I think that's a big part of it whereas previously the press had too much power and they got on the backs of all the managers and then the managers were like, if I don't pick him and then you had all the clicks man United Liverpool, Chelsea. Whereas Southgate seems to have sorted all that out. And I think that's why he's got to a semi-fanner well cup and a fan of the Euros because he's really got people together, you know. So, can we win it and cut that? No, they're all too pale. They're going to disinstead them, should be fine. I know, but that's fun. They're going to disinstead them. Saying that though, there aren't too many changes. No. So they should be alright. That is well cup. That just leave the changes at home. Honestly, it wouldn't last five minutes. Telling you now. I'm not going now. I'm going to stay away. Listen, I went to Vegas nearly killed me. That was nothing to do with what happens in Vegas. That desert landscape, nothing to change you. This will be your vampire. Okay, on that note, let's leave it there. There you go. I don't know what you think is the best partnership. But if anyone out there wants to pay for us to go to Qatar as part of any kind of market nor sponsorship deal, I will slap on the factor 100. The 150.  Qatar I'm thinking maybe up more 100. Double up, double up, double down. So make sure you check out the rest of that video. The link is in the description. Leave a comment on the best fitter website there with your thoughts on the best partnership and all of that in Canningham when they're well cup. There you go. Make sure you give the video a thumbs up. Subscribe if you haven't so we'll see you later.


Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome. This is Melissa with the stockswush.com. And I thought I would review NVIDIA. I traded this this morning. Went and left to the gym, came back, and lo and behold, it's 2 o'clock. And this actually went to, really, the dream target. Well, the dream target was 20. So I can't. Well, this went to close to the dream target. Let's put it that way. 2050, which was a target I wrote in the room this morning. And I did say $20 is a dream target, which it's not going to get to now because it's Friday and it's 2 o'clock. But this set a beautiful move in the day. Gorgeous. So let's go over it. What could you have done with this and what did I originally do with this? Let's go back. The morning play was really great, though. You could have been very aggressive in this though in the afternoon. But I would have had to be here, sitting here, taking a trade on a Friday afternoon, which, when it's 80 degrees and beautiful out, is little chance of that happening. Anyways, Nvidia opened, rallied, rallied up to here, held, beautiful selling coming into this, positioning here after the rally. I'm not sure of every rally. Something has to meet the criteria. What's the criteria? The golden gap 26 point rating system. This gap rated more than 20 points. So I decided I'd look to watch it to short on the day because it was a gap down. This is a large rally. Let's gotta point that out. Okay, it's almost a buck. Off of 21 is the low. Open at 21-0-1, bounce off at 21. Look at this, okay? Then I took it in here, stopped here, dropped here, could have done an ad here, which I did, and fell. Now when I did the Adelaide to stop, this was a nice, nice, nice move here in the morning. I got out of this at 91. Two pennies from the morning low. That was a great call. More than three hours, and with the ad it was even better than that. You need to know how to do ads, which I teach in the entry class actually, not the golden gap class. But if you don't know how to do them, you could take them in my direction in the room, which I do think a lot of people do in the room actually. But that was a good way to maximize this, because I was looking to kind of scout this today in the morning, meaning quickly, quickly, quickly, get out because it was Friday afternoon. And I also knew that the market was bullish today, which it was and it is. If you had the patience really to stay with this thing, here is the entry on the late morning afternoon move into lunch. I mean, this is pretty spectacular if you played it right. Although I'm sure you'd have to know how to do this again, which I do, but I just didn't do this because I wasn't sitting here watching at 11 o'clock. But here it is. If I had been sitting here watching it, I would have seen it. And then it went and just fell off a cliff. And you'd be looking to get out right in here into these numbers. And it hit the target of 2050. So, one of the things is when you're trading a gap and you're in the train, you need to know, number one, where is your entry? Where are you putting your stop? How much money are you risking, dollars and cents in the train? And what kind of move you're looking for as far as the risk to reward and you need to know your exit. So, when I get up in the morning and I rate my gap, I'm looking for specific criteria in the gap first that gives me the pick. The pick today for me was NVIDIA. I said this would work. I was right. I knew this was the best thing to watch. And actually, as far as short skirt days, it's the only thing that works right in the morning as a short. And it even continued in the afternoon, which just shows how good and quality of the gap that it was. Anyways, getting back to what I was saying, I fill out the sheet in the morning, have everything figured out and situated, but then you still have to watch the stock on the live day. It takes a little bit of knowing, okay, knowing what to look for. Now, how do you know that? Because you have it all figured out ahead of time. So, you figure it all out ahead of time. That gives you the conviction. Then you still have to watch on the live day for the setup, because I'm not in a pre or post market. And then you know what you're looking for when it happens live to take it, okay? Because the morning trade, for example, hit very hard early and quick when you had to get it good. And that afternoon one worked, the late morning one worked, but it might not happen. So I always look to get the morning quick ones. And in an ideal world, in an ideal perfect Melissa Armo world, I literally take every trade in the morning quickly and I'm out of it within 30 minutes or less and make more than three hours. That's my ideal world. And I do that often enough. Today was one of those days. However, if you did play Nubidia, again, if you knew how to play it right, it had a beautiful risk to reward for a late trade if you hit it. And it was a nice, nice Scott, which is how I need to do this pick to begin with. There was tons of things gaping down this morning though. There really was, particularly with what the market was doing, but the fact is that I knew that this was the best. So I'm very happy with my day and we'll go over the afternoon trade here, the late morning trade in the room on Monday. I would completely be out of Nubidia by now. It's over here, it's two 10 in the afternoon on a Friday, but this was a great call by me and it really was the entry. The entry in this and the ad is what really made this look amazing and everybody in the room did it. So congratulations to everyone in the live trading room with me that did it. It was a beautiful call. I am the best out there at entries, calling them, seeing them in live, live time, which I'm able to do. And that's one of the reasons people like to be in the live trading room with me and also learn from me as well. So if you'd like more information about the upcoming golden gap course, it is May 16th and 17th. Email me at melissa at thestockswish.com. Have a great weekend everyone.


Please subscribe to this YouTube channel mentor, talk and do press bell button for notifications. India, United States and many other countries will have to be be aware of China's growing success in human intelligence recruitment alongside technological surveillance because technology, internet and mobile apps are not the only tools China has been using. Last week, two former officers of France Foreign Intelligence Services called the General Directorate for External Security were convicted with long prison terms for spying for China. Yes, they were convicted for spying for China. Nobody in the France Premier Intelligence Agency could ever doubt them, these two people. It is reported that both officers were respected employees with one of them having served earlier as DGSC's top officer or station chief in Beijing. He was apparently called back from Beijing to Paris after having an affair with the then French ambassador's Chinese interpreter. The said intelligence officer went back to China after his retirement and married the same Chinese woman interpreter. It is that and then he, you know, sort of relocated in China. Is it that the China is using women to entice and pull the foreign diplomats and foreign intelligence officers? The French intelligence officers were arrested post their retirement in December 2017. And one of them was found with a bag full of cash in Switzerland when he was returning from one of the islands in the Indian Ocean after having met some Chinese official. His wife has also been convicted for aiding the husband in this spying activities. It is believed that the information which they shared with China had great value. As reported in a section of the US media, it is a wake up call for all and not just for the French, not only for the French. You know, China's Ministry of State Security and People's Liberation Army intelligence units of China, you know, have spent past decade steadily advancing their penetration into the western democratic institutions, you know, such as European Union and high technology institutions across the United States.


Yeah, I um they have a great coach Justin beachy doesn't let them give up and you know it shows in their players that third set I Don't know. Did they ever have the lead? I think they came close. I mean it was right, you know into the 20s, so And that was actually very good for us For the final is that we were playing a team that competes and believes they can beat us So they actually played as tougher. They actually took a set from us the first time we played them So but we're playing at a high level now Guys, you know did really well Yeah, Landon just like all year. He was his player of the year, you know for the Mac and he showed why And Jason really came through you played maybe his best match And he did this last year too. I hope it continues It's you never know in sports, but he you know put away really critical balls that we when they were coming close On that back set to him is great and hitting from the back row and serving So I was I was in particular happy with our serving we kept knocking them back, you know with their passing and And then our you know block was able to touch balls up But geez a there's a couple guys we couldn't stop really their opposite played really well and NAB is a nice outside hitter for him. I Think play like we did tonight. I mean we played really well. We served well and We will have to serve well against Arcadia They have really good offense great setter, you know good hitters really good hitters in middle So it's not gonna get any easier And you know they've beaten us and they beat us at our home. We beat them there. So it's it's the The grudge match will be a good one


Today, folks, is Olivia Manchin. Olivia is the co-founder of the Fairgrounds in St. Pete. Bottom line, she's also the director of communication for the St. Pete Fairgrounds. Now, the St. Pete Fairgrounds, folks, bottom line is that they have put together a certain that's pretty phenomenal. We're talking about exhibits. We're talking about events. We're talking about workshops. And we're talking about a cultural hub for immersible art experiences. And, and this is the kicker here, an economic engine for local artists and craft folks. Olivia, welcome to TFNN. Thank you so much for having me, Tom. I'm really excited to be here today. Absolutely. So tell us, number one, about what the public can expect when they're coming to the Fairgrounds. Yeah, so Fairgrounds St. Pete is a 15,000 square foot immersive art and technology destination. So this is the first of its kind here in Tampa Bay. So truthfully, hopefully when you come, you've never experienced anything like it.  So you're no longer any, in this perception of time, space, reality, we've taken the theme of Florida and made it weird, wacky, and wonderful. So there will be things that you recognize, but it'll be in a way that you've just never seen before. That's pretty amazing. And when you take a look at this place, folks, this place is blocks and blocks. Now, in the really cool deal, you know, no matter where you are in the country, okay, we talk about the markets every day, but what Olivia and her team has done, folks, okay, is taking the aspect of art, creativity, brought it into a space that people can really do well. So talk to me about the aspect. Well, first off, talk to me about how you selected the artist, all right, and what you're looking at for your inaugural exhibits. Awesome. Yeah, so for some context, we are an anchor tenant. So we're a tenant in this bigger factory. It's called the Factory St. Pete, and it's about eight warehouses, and every warehouse will have something different. And for us, we're building number six, and we are 15,000 square foot of this really huge campus that does- I know. It's in blocks. And for this inaugural exhibit, we have 60 artists that we have hand selected that have gone through a process with fairgrounds, but we're also a company of artists and entrepreneurs. So there are a lot of people within our company that are craftspeople that have made a lot of the exhibits. So when you walk in, you'll be able to see the hand in the craft of our Fairground St. Pete team and these 64 artists. Now, let me ask you something. I believe Mikhail, is that Mikhail? Is he your husband? Is he your husband? So it's a package deal, right? Is that how it works? It is. And you had him on it. That's awesome. No, I had Mikhail on folks a few weeks ago, and I was looking at your resumes. You have huge resumes. I mean, because it takes a certain type of skill set to do this, right? It does, it does. I think a lot of it is tenacity, a lot of it is desire that entrepreneurial spirit. And then we also are just surrounded by just some of the most incredible talented people on our team. Our co-founder Liz Dimit is just incredibly just talented, intelligent, and Tyson Johnson is just a business brain. So we are also not only internally motivated, but we're surrounded by some incredible people. And then we've also, I think similar to you, we spent some time up North, and I went to Brown University. So I also have some really nice schools that I've been able to study at. You had some fun up there, for sure. Thank you. Talk to us about the profit share that you have with the artists. How does that work? Yeah, and I think your audience will be really fascinated by it. So our profit model is, as far as I know, unique. And I haven't heard of one similar to it. So essentially, we commissioned these 64 artists. They proposed artwork, we purchased it, and it's now at Fairgrounds St. Pete, and people will be able to see it when we open. But as far and as long as their artwork is on view at Fairgrounds St. Pete, they will be receiving a percentage of profits from a percentage from our profits. That is so cool, man.  Now, when are you guys gonna be opening? Do we have a couple more months? When are we gonna be opening? We're so, okay, so we're so, so, so close to opening. And what I tell people is to join our Insiders Club, which is our email list. And if you go to fairgrounds.art, there you can join our Insiders Club. It's free to join right now, and you will be the first to find out when our tickets go on sale. But it's very, very soon. And Tom, I can't wait to have you when you're available to come. Listen, I'm there all the time. I build a lot of, on Fairfield itself, I own a lot of property, so it's pretty funny. Cause I build houses there. But it's intriguing the way that you've set this whole thing up, cause there's no doubt. I've seen the amount of work that you've done. It's incredible the amount of work that you've done. I love the idea that you can actually bring artists in and to me, really teaching them how to make a living, which is really my best friend's an artist. There always has been, you know what I mean? And it's always a tough business, man. You could be the best artist in the world and it's like, okay, how do you do this? How do you make money at this? You know what I'm saying? Exactly, exactly. And that's what I love about Fairgrounds is that we encourage artists to think like business people. We, you know, as entrepreneurs themselves, they need that mindset.  And for us, it's, you know, we can teach the art of business and being savvy and understanding that it's, you know, it doesn't have to be overwhelming and it doesn't have to be scary, you know? Like you're already doing it. And I'm sure the collective that you have, it's much more powerful when you have a collective like that. Yeah, and I'm so glad you're pointing that out. And that was a big intention for us in the beginning was to create this alumni and to create this group of artists. And for future calls, we'll do the same. We really think that them having the power of being able to share ideas and share their learnings was really important to us. Yeah, there's no doubt. Well, listen, Olivia, we really appreciate it.  You know, bottom line, get on that list. I'm on that list right now. You know, so just get, join the Insiders Club. You just put your email down there. You'll get updated when they're gonna be ready. And listen, man, the bottom line is that it's great having you on. You've done an amazing job. And I think it's just fabulous that you're giving so many people an opportunity to have a great living. That's the real bottom line. Never mind the amount of people that enjoy the art and the amount of younger children that can turn on and say, hey, man, I can be an artist. I can be creative. Mm-hmm, I love that. I absolutely love that. And 100%, you've just said it so beautifully. Well, listen, you have a great one, safe one, and we look forward to having you on again, Olivia. I look forward to it, Tom. Thank you so much for the invite. Thank you. Have a great one, have a safe one.


Project coordination for several grant-funded projects, one of them is to recruit medical school students into the master's programs at the School of Information and Library Science. But many things and her master's degree in library science, she holds that and it's from Florida State University. So now Peggy Schaefer is almost ready to give us her talk and tell us more about the right of data to publish. Do I need to hold this? Okay. I'm not sure. You can try it. Thanks. Thank you. No, I'll do this. This is fine. Thank you very much. Thanks so much for letting me talk about Dryad. It's one of my favorite things to do. And I want to tell you today a little bit about Dryad, about the joint data archiving policy, affectionately known as JDAP, and how Dryad works with journals and publishers, how librarians can use Dryad a little bit, and some ideas for ways that librarians might support research data management in publication. So first let me start. What is Dryad? Well, Dryad is a repository that holds data associated with scientific publications. These are mostly journal articles, but also we have data associated with thesis work and a book chapter and a book. This is a small piece we recognize of the research data life cycle that you've heard about. It initially had a scope in evolutionary biology and ecology, but we have now added many other fields. You'll find medical data, public health data, paleontology. Indeed, our scope now includes any scholarly publication. Yes, that does include the humanities. So the humanities data does have a place to go. We also have recently added something from computational linguistics. So it's a very diverse data repository. So let me just read the content policy. It's only about a sentence. Dryad is an international repository of data underlying peer-reviewed scientific and medical literature, particularly data for which no specialized repository exists. So we are aiming toward the long tail of research data. And what makes Dryad unique, furthermore, is that all the material in Dryad is associated with a scholarly publication. You cannot submit your data to Dryad unless you have an accepted or an in-review publication to associate it with. So we preserve in one place all the data supporting the conclusions of the article, all the data necessary to replicate the findings in the article. We also have, as I said, a very diverse body of data. And for example, we have things on the amount of force used by a shark to bite different kinds of prey. And perhaps my favorite data set is about how people perceive simulated monsters. So if you're able to get on the Dryad website and type monsters into the search box, you'll see what I mean. We welcome data in any format. It makes it easier, of course, to take all formats if you want to preserve all the data underlying a single article. We would, of course, prefer non-proprietary formats. And yes, we do take PDFs, although I didn't include it in the Word Cloud. We would rather authors did not submit data as a PDF, and we do encourage them to use reusable formats. So we've got movies. We've got movies of battling fiddler crabs. And we've got animated 3D dinosaurs and sound files like bird calls. And yes, we have software if it doesn't have a better home somewhere else. All the data in Dryad is released under the CC0 waiver. I'm not going to talk about CC0, but that's a way in which you can make the data maximally reusable for humans and machines. There are no barriers or no restrictions into its reuse. So let me tell you a little about the joint data archiving policy. This was a policy that emerged along with Dryad about 2009 from discussions among a few journal editors, primarily in ecology and evolutionary biology, who were acutely aware of the data that was being lost as the articles were being published, but without the underlying data being saved. So they wrote this policy and about 2009 and coordinated its adoption in 2010 and 2011. And many journals have signed on to this now and continue to do so. Excuse me. We want to support replicable science, the data supporting all the results in the paper, but not all of your data. We do, as you see, allow for embargoes and exceptions for sensitive data. This policy can serve as a model for other disciplines and other journals are welcome to adopt or adapt JDAP. So let me just show you quickly our new home page. If you haven't looked at Dryad in the last few months, take another look. We have redesigned the web page. These stats are from late April. There are now 223 journals with data in Dryad and over 12,000 authors who've deposited to Dryad. We have 32 integrated journal partners. These are journals who work with us behind the scenes as they are processing the manuscripts under review. They tell us about their manuscript and we prepare and pre-populate a record in Dryad to make the author's submission of data easier. The author doesn't then have to retype the article and author names. So here's what a data package looks like in Dryad. This is the landing page for an article from the Journal of Ecology and Evolution. And we display the cover for our partner journals and clicking on that cover allows the user to go directly to the article on the journal website. This lists all the files associated with an article. In this case, there are two. And at the time I, this is an article from August 2012, which had been, one file, and if you can see that, one file had been downloaded 61 times and another file 33 times. You can also see that the top file has a readme file. The author has provided some information, perhaps some context about how the data were collected or some instructions for its reuse in a separate file. This is another data file in Dryad. This one's from 2009 and it has been downloaded over 4,000 times. We think some of this reuses from data in the classroom. We think that people are assigning students to work with this data. Journals benefit when data is reused. And here are some recent stats from about a month ago showing for our most, the journals with the most data packages in Dryad, these are all among our integrated partner journals, how many downloads and how much use those data files have gotten. So what makes Dryad unique? Here are a few things. It's the close association of data deposition with the process and business of scholarly publishing and using article publishing as a model for how researchers can benefit from data sharing. Also, the article metadata becomes the foundation of the metadata for the associated data. Data files in Dryad are curated. I'm sure you'll be glad to know they are curated by real-life librarians and information science students at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. So we are an open data, open source, and an open organization. Dryad is also a nonprofit organization. We are a new nonprofit organization comprised of members. Members can be journals, publishers, libraries, data found, data producers, funders, et cetera. And there's more information on the website. So here are some ideas about how librarians can use Dryad. I offer you Dryad to use as you wish. You can, of course, ask scientists about their data. I think this is a natural first step. And don't wait for them to ask. Ask them where is it? What are your plans for preserving it and making it available? And make sure they know your data is important, and it deserves to be preserved. I'm not sure everyone always knows that. And you can suggest that they can archive their data in a public repository like Dryad. You can show them, you can use Dryad to demo how many times data in their field, say some other article in a journal that's familiar to them, how many times that data has been downloaded. Very often our authors are surprised when they deposit data in Dryad and come back a few weeks later and they think, who are those 65 people who downloaded my data set? I didn't think anyone was interested. So I think it's an interesting experience for people to be able to look at that, just look at those numbers. And here are some other scenarios that I think could be useful. We think younger scientists can gain additional visibility for work, for their work by making their data files available, incitable, by adding, for example, a section to their CVs for their data publications. Another scenario we're familiar with is when a research team, perhaps one that's been in existence for a while, decides to archive all of its data in Dryad. We had one case of this when over the weekend we suddenly discovered one author had archived 17 data files associated with 17 articles. And it turned out it was the work of a multinational team of people who've been working for many years on tunicates. These are small, sponge-like animals. And they decided, well, let's just put all the data in Dryad. And then when anyone asks us for it, we can just point them to Dryad, and we don't need to be bothered with those requests any longer. And here's another idea. You can deposit your data in Dryad. Yes, we have information science data in Dryad. Some of you might be familiar with Heather Pivovar and the work she's done on data citations and the impact of them on article citations. And Heather Pivovar's data is in Dryad. Data in Dryad can be deposited for free at the moment. In September, we will start charging. We'll be implementing some modest data deposit fees in order to maintain ourselves as a sustainable organization. And there's more information about this on the website. We also recommend that you talk to authors about the advantages of data sharing. These may not always be obvious. So let me say this is what we say to authors. We say visibility, making your data available online and linking it back to the publication provides a new pathway for others to learn about your work. And there's a correlation between the availability of a data set linked to an article in that article citation rank. Making it citable when you deposit in Dryad, as in other repositories, you receive a DOI. You might need to explain to researchers why a DOI is better than a URL for pointing people to their data. It can be reused. Others can cite you and it will gain you academic credit. We say, we mentioned workload reduction. If you put it in Dryad, you can simply direct requests for the data to Dryad. We will preserve it. Your data files will be permanently and safely archived in perpetuity. We'll keep your files intact. We migrate them to new formats as old formats become obsolete so you won't have to worry about whether Excel 2003 files will open in Excel 2023. An impact, of course, everyone wants impact. You will garner citations through the reuse of your data and you can monitor that through Dryad's statistics. You could also gain opportunities for new collaborations. And here are some other ideas on ways to support scientific data management. One is to consult and share best practice guidelines. And here are two that we link to in Dryad. There may be others that I'm not aware of or maybe you feel the need that there needs to be a data best practice guidelines for the data in your field. And I would encourage you then to create one and let us know about it. Another idea that I feel is important is to use and promote good data citations with DOIs. And as we all are aware, I think data citation conventions are evolving. But I think authors, journals and publishers all need to see good models of data citation. These can be in articles, in CVs, in grant proposals. So let's all help to make data citation familiar. Many journals don't have policies yet about how to cite data. So we're in early days yet. And if an author is depositing data in Dryad or another repository and wants to refer to it in their article, it's often up to the author to make sure that that DOI is included in the journal article. We also encourage that people consider using DOIs in social media. With just more and more CV type information online in LinkedIn or in Twitter, with DOIs become more familiar, I think that practice will improve. Here's Dryad's citation philosophy. We urge people to cite both the article and the data. But to cite the data at the data package level, the data package is all the files pertinent to a certain article. So here's another example. Here's an example I showed you earlier. This is also noteworthy. This is the one that was downloaded over 4,000 times. But perhaps some of you can see that the list of authors is different for the article as for the data set. And this is at the author's request to reflect the differing contributions of people to the creation of the data. So perhaps, and this is another incentive, that an independent data citation can provide a reward for members of collaborations who want to get primary credit for their contributions to the data. So this is how we recommend that authors and journals cite data in Dryad, but are they doing so? So there are two cases here, of course. There's the time when you cite the data, when the data is that underlying the present article, and there are times when you cite data that you have reused. We've looked recently, well, here's an example that's not so good. I don't like to point fingers, but this is buried in the references and acknowledgments with no DOI or URL. Very much doubt that anyone reading this could find the data associated with this article. This is an old example, to be fair, from a few years ago. We recently studied citations to data in the data sharing article for 338 articles from our partner journals that had been published in the last year. So the good news is, at least 75% of them did include a data citation with a DOI, and they were all over the article, some in a special section, some in the article header, some in the methods or acknowledgments, and some in the references. So there's no consistency furthermore between journals and how they cite the data. Standards are still evolving and journals aren't sure what to do with these data citations, so I say watch this space. Some more ideas for ways that libraries and librarians can be involved here would be scientific data positions at academic libraries. We're seeing this some in the states where people are getting titles such as a research data coordinator in academic libraries. There are scholarly communications officers that are often librarians, and all kinds of collaborative roles where librarians existing collaboration can be a starting point for data preservation and sharing work. And I feel these are natural roles for us as librarians. We're already involved with researchers at the right time and in the right place. We have the expertise and we have the opportunity. I think we should use it. And new opportunities are rising all the time in emerging roles and I'll be interested to hear from anyone now or later what other ideas you might have about emerging roles for librarians here. And someone said last week at the data publication meetings in Oxford libraries are old but data sharing is not. I thought I agreed with that at first but now I'm not so sure actually. So that's what I had to say about Dryad and I welcome your inquiries, get in touch by any of these methods, follow us on Twitter, and I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. Thank you. Are there any questions? My name is Lukas Koster University of Amsterdam Library. I have a couple of questions. I'm not sure if that's allowed. So this is very interesting. I've seen the links between the datasets and articles and vice versa as well. But I have a question. I'm not at, I'm not, I work for a library but I'm not a librarian. Also I'm not really a researcher. I can imagine that an article that's based, is based on a dataset or a set of datasets but also other articles can be based on the same dataset. Do you kind of have a provision for that in Dryad without having to duplicate the dataset deposit? I think that with our way our process works an author who was reusing a dataset a second time say they published once from it and then they come back and they've got some more findings. They would probably re-deposit that dataset. It might be a little different and we do enable versioning. We freeze the dataset. So say you deposited it this year and then next year you worked more and you would deposit the data again. It might have new data, new fields, new columns, whatever. That would be a different dataset to us. But it could be exactly the same dataset that has been used as a source for another member of the project team to write another article. Right. And we would, in our metadata, we would be able to refer to that and this is also true if the dataset lives in an institutional repository as is sometimes the case. We would make sure that we would be able to identify this as a unique item. So there wouldn't be confusion. Is this the same as that? I'm always surprised that there is this direct link in this whole research and data management world between an article and the data. Because in my mind, I think there is a research project which has a number of people involved and organizations and there are a number of outputs, inputs and outputs. Are you thinking of kind of adding links to project information if it's available in for instance in local research information systems which then could give you the link to everything associated with that. The data sets every other output. I'm not sure that we would incorporate that but that sounds like the perfect thing to put in a readme file. So if somebody in the readme file says this data was collected as part of a long running collaboration, you may wish to, I've seen this before, consult our website or contact Joe Schmoe if you need more information. Okay, that's fine if you're looking at a human. Right. But we, I work with library systems and making available articles, metadata about articles, links to the full text and I'm currently involved in a kind of pilot to be able to see if I can link articles using identifiers if there are two project research information data sets and et cetera. So we actually need, in our business, we need the machine readable metadata also from the articles. Right. So here's an idea. We have on our website under the contact us page, we have on ideas forum where we welcome these suggestions. You can put your idea there and other people can vote for it, or you might find some other ideas that you'd like to support. So I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. Time for more questions. Are there any more? Thanks, thanks, Peggy. I have a question about your, you said you're going to start charging and how you develop this policy, what this will mean for libraries and where will the funds come from project funding? Right. Exactly. Well, that is the big question I have to be saying to say. We've worked since 2009 to create a sustainable business plan for Dryad because no one, no one thinks that a funding organization like the National Science Foundation is going to fund operation like this in perpetuity. To be stable, we knew from the outset we needed to solve this problem about sustainability in a business plan. So back in 2010, we authorized two different consulting firms. We took the results of their work. We have a board who worked through that. We came up with a tentative business plan. It very early on, it ruled out some things. For example, we're not going to charge for data use. Access will always be free. We need to charge at the point of ingest. That's when the costs are incurred and so on. And we made calculations on the scale. How much will we need to ingest and curate to be sustainable at various different fees. So this has been in the works for several years and there's actually much more detail I could give you about this. But maybe what's most important is to know how is it going to work. So it's going to work in starting in September. There'll be deposit fees. They can be paid by any organization. A university, for example, could buy vouchers. They could buy a thousand vouchers. They could buy 50 vouchers. And they could give those vouchers out to researchers that would enable them to deposit data for free. Funding organizations can buy vouchers or can support the use of grant funds to pay the deposit fees. There are waivers for researchers who come from less developed countries. And then if none of these plans pertain and there's also a subscription plan for journals and publisher. If none of those plans are pertinent at the point of deposit then the author will pay an $80 fee. $80 per data deposit. That's $80 per data package at the point of depositing the data. Thank you. Okay. Moving on. We're coming at the last talk of this morning.


Recently, while I was digging through the deep web, messing with those hackers, I saw something called Build-A-Block. So, I looked it up on the real web, nothing. While messing around on eBay, I found a CD disc called Build-A-Block prototype. It was around $42, when I bought it. I emailed the seller when it was made, and he said around December 1990. So, David Basszuki was making ideas for Roblox but, this prototype was unusual. Okay, so I grabbed my modded Macintosh Quadra 950, it was for Macintoshes only, and booted up. I inserted the Build-A-Block prototype and it had a glitchy startup. It was a prototype for Roblox Studio, and it was called Build-A-Block Test Server. Of course, no one was there. I built, for about an hour and I built a little city. Somehow, the game started glitching out. I didn't care. Then, someone called Test came. The chat button was H, so, I said, who are you? Test then said, welcome to the Build-A-Block prototype. When he said that, it reminded me of John and Jane Doe. I then said, is this a Roblox prototype? No response. Everything looked similar. It was so similar to Dynablocks. When I kept saying, is this Roblox? Test then said, December 27th, 1990. I was like, what? Then, the server froze and the test guy kept controlling me. I tried quitting the game. My mouse was frozen. I tried shutting off my Quadra 950, nothing. About three minutes being controlled, the game stopped. My Quadra froze up and was smoking. I got some water to stop the smoke. Out of pure luck, my computer did not short-circuit. I looked up this prototype once again on my main computer I use, and this showed up on a deep web forum site. Build-A-Block was an unreleased prototype released around December 23rd, 1990 at 12.30 a.m. It showed up that late due to a problem of starting the prototype because of computer issues. Around December 25th, 1990, 28 users logged onto the site. The website was in an alpha stage and had some games like, awesome game, Christmas game and test server. Test server had no players each day and David Basszucky said, this server is not for the public, please don't enter. On December 27th, 1990, one player decided to enter it and around 4.25 a.m., he got banned from the Build-A-Block prototype and was murdered. On July 30th, 2003, one of the old testers said, 12 players were killed while entering that test server. Dynablocks was sued for having banned slaughter and 12 players randomly killed. Dynablocks shut down on January 29th, 2004.  I searched up the cause of the 12 players death was murder. Apparently, the one who brutally murdered those 12 players was probably that unknown test player that greeted me in the first place. About a year later, a video appeared on the Roblox forums that posted a YouTube link and the video was called test. The video showed static. The video was really, really shaky and 12 players were on the server. The record date of the right corner said, December 27th, 1990, 4.30 a.m. Then, the video got shaky and shaky. The 12 players at the time were in their cabin and the unknown recorder was near their location. The unknown recorder found the location and he recorded brutally murdering them on tape. On June 25th, 2005, 23 seconds after the video was released, it was deleted. It reached about three to five views. Never to been seen but on the deep web. Please, do not ever get the prototype. You can pretty much die. I threw the CD away just for the sake of it. Also, there are only four copies of that CD and I do not know why it was selling for $42. On the forum on the deep web, some guy said four copies exist since he was a former developer. He later died around 2011. The thread was old. If you see something called build a block test, it may be best not to buy it because of the rumors.