But if I'm hopeful the way this week is going to play out, you might have a melt-up, but you might have a melt-up in very, very aggressive groups. Welcome to Access a Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success, profitability, and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge, master your process, and own your future. And down the stretch we come. Good morning, everybody. And happy weekend. Hope everybody is doing well. Welcome to another edition of TheAxisTrader.com. Weekend update show. Hope everybody is doing well. Just before we start, we've got four days in this week. Friday, you're going to see pretty much a ghost town. Labor day, obviously. The last kind of hurrah for summer. For all you guys who have been wondering about pivots and considering pivots, there's a really, really cool offer somewhere in this video, Kyler will put it in. It's like 47 bucks. You have access to the webinar for a month. You have access to the workshops and all that good stuff, kind of breaking down what the PS60 theory is and why it's so cool and all that cool stuff. So if you're interested, this is definitely the week to take advantage of it and see if it's right fit for you. So let's talk about the markets. The biggest mark, the greatest testament to a market, how strong it is, it's the ability to fight adversity, right? Adversity, resilience, all the stuff that makes a human being, right? Strong character, strong will, persons, markets are exactly the same thing. And the market has been on a phenomenal run. I don't think anybody could turn around and say anything different, whether your trading is mirroring what's going on in the market as a whole different story. Again, it's a whole conversation for another time. You might be just trading stocks that have nothing to do with correlation with the market. But again, it's a whole conversation for another period of time. And you can see what's been going on with the tape just over the last four and a half years that everything has been bought up. The global pandemic, again, kind of a biggie. Still kind of in the middle of it. But that's been embraced in a weird way. And the craziest thing is, if you have a conversation with another stock trader or economist or anybody, mainstream investor at any point during this pandemic, and it's marvelous to think out loud that despite this global pandemic, we're at all-time highs, okay? That's called resiliency. That's called knowing how to fight through adversity. This is basically getting punched in the mouth for 11 rounds and coming back for the 12th and knocking out your opponent. And the market's been like this the whole way through. So even if you go back to Wednesday night, right? We talked about, hey, be careful. Maybe you don't want to buy anything overextended. Just watch it, watch it. And we had a coincidence, pure coincidence. I will never take credit for a headline. But you saw that headline come in about the attack in Afghanistan that unfortunately led to, I think, 13 servicemen and women unfortunately got killed. And the market obviously did not like the news that they all sold off. A little bit less than 200 points. NASDAQ got hit as well. But what happened was the next day, they took those headlines that were obviously negative and sensitive and market rattling. And they were gone. It's like it was nothing there. And they completely engulfed the previous day's candle. And not only that, engulfed the whole high from this whole formation from this last week of trading. So it's super duper bulge, right? And it's very, very hard to dispute and try to handicap the action going into this week. And this week will be a lot slower. Again, we only have a very limited time left till Labor Day. Friday is, like I said, is going to be a ghost town. I'm gonna be in the Hamptons from Friday to Monday. So you guys will probably get a recording Monday night, right? You'll probably get a recording Monday night for the new week. So a lot of people are gonna be gone. A lot of people will be taking advantage of kind of the short week, the longer weekend and kind of trying to fight and get that less bit of summer in there. So don't be surprised going into this week. If you have some days, a couple of days, there might be slower. There might be more lethargic. And you sit there and you're like this at 10, 15 in the morning trying to figure out, well, how come Tesla hasn't moved in the first hour? How come Netflix hasn't done anything? So it's very, very important to kind of take it into stride. I don't think you're going to have a meaningful market resolution till people come back after the Labor Day weekend. But for now, it's super duper bullish. You really don't need to dissect the market. Now you just have to find the strongest groups. And again, a lot of times throughout the year, we have to play devil's advocate. We have to do this. We have to do that. What happens in this? What happens that? Look, we're not naive. We know a market pull could come at any time. Again, I've been trading 22 years. We've seen markets get pulled for like no reason just because it's Tuesday, right? So the market doesn't need a reason to pull. So we're always wary of the super extended stocks. But we're also kind of focusing, and again, if you've been watching this broadcast now for a while, always focus on the stocks that are coming off the bottom, coming off the bottom ranges or the middle ranges. That's why moves like a Peloton, right? This week was tremendous, right? And before, obviously, the scap down. But you know, you had a move going from 75, I'm sorry, not Peloton. I'm sorry, wrong stock, P10, pen, pen, too early in the morning, Sunday. I knew it looked crazy, right? Like a stock like Penn National Gaming coming off the bottom. Again, is going to get a really, really aggressive move. A stock like Amazon that, again, has been left for dead ever since earnings. But once it kind of started reclaiming the big levels that we always focus on, especially on videos, the five, 10-day moving average, it started the sequence of events and now for higher prices. And that's kind of what we want to focus, you know, names that are coming out of the bottom channels, the stocks that are overextended, we're leaving them alone, right? That's where gravity kicks in. This is where you lose control of the trade. We want to make sure that if I'm going to have a trade that doesn't work out, it's going to stall the bottom of the range, not at the top, where the violence is very, very unforgiving. So the key going into this week is, again, find the groups that have been very, very strong. Find the groups that have been resilient and most important, find the groups now that even if you don't have the greatest amount of volatility or greatest amount of, what is the word I'm looking for, greatest amount of resistance, right, this week, because the participants are on vacation, you want to make sure that those are the channels that have the highest probability of going because majority of people are probably not focusing on those groups. So if you go into this week, you really don't have to be very creative. And I say this all the time because you're trying to keep it as simplistic as possible. Look at the strongest group, right? Semiconductors, ready to bust out. And you can see it, you can see it in the charts. You know, and the video has been a monster. AMD woke up on Friday very aggressively. Look again, we'll get to individual pivots in a second, right? That they've been super strong. Look at a name like LRCX, right? Super strong name. Look at a strong name like Xilinx, right? Like Xilinx that I really like for this week, right? These are the stocks that are super, duper strong. So again, why start looking at random names that I'm putting in random moves if you have a whole tribe mentality of groups going in the same direction. Look at the financials, right? Look at names like Citibank, right? Ready to come out of this bottom channel here. Look at Goldman Sachs, right? Look at Goldman, look at JP Morgan. Look at a name like one of the names that I like this week is Schwab, right? Look at a name like Schwab. Look at this channel it's coming in. So you have really, really good value. And I think there's something here for everybody. So a lot of times you'll have a market that is small cap driven. And that'll be a very isolated incident for a short number of weeks. And then you have a market sometimes, hey, look at consumer cyclicals, they're very, very strong. You like consumer cyclicals, well, they all trades them. But there is a market for that. Then there's majority of the year you do have a tremendous amount of average to range in technology names, right? But now you have everything. And that's the whole point. You have everything right now can it change on a moment's notice? Of course, right? Can the market tank next week and say they're gonna do the worst? Yeah, of course, anything is possible. But we're conscious of that. We're not naive to that. We're not going into any single trading day with eyes closed and hoping to God we're right. We're waiting for confirmation and letting these things play out technically, not emotionally. But this is one of the very few opportunities that everything is going. I mean, look at names, smaller cap names like a BBIG, right? A BBIG just doesn't, right? You have a small cap market. You have names in technology that's breaking out, right? Like Netflix, this is my trade from Friday, really great. So you have Netflix breaking out.  You have semiconductors going nuts. So there's something there for everybody.  The key now is to sit back, relax, go through your research and trade the stocks that you feel comfortable. Not that somebody else is comfortable, not some guy, JoeSchmo.com trading is comfortable.  Take the game plan, take the four or five names you want to concentrate on and omit everything else, put on the blinders and concentrate on those names. And the one thing that we are seeing is everything is getting pulled up. And if I'm right and hopeful, I think more hopeful than right. I don't care about being right, but if I'm hopeful the way this week is gonna play out, you might have a meltup, but you might have a meltup in very, very aggressive groups. And if that's the case, we should have a pretty damn good valuable trading session to kind of end the summit, right? At least some end the Labor Day weekend. And again, if you go through all the indexes, you'll see meltup in the queues, spies, all-time highs, you've got the diamonds being pulled up, looks like the diamonds are gonna be at all-time highs. The one group, right? The one group that finally busted out, right guys? You guys remember we were talking about this for a while, right?  This was the last group, the IWM. They finally closed above the 225 level. Remember the 50-day moving average? How important that 50-day is? First close over the 50-day moving average. And if the IWM that represents the smaller cap names, if they confirm this 127, excuse me, 227 on a bill, you're gonna have the next leg up and everything, right? That's called speculation capital, speculation market, the hot money, right? Everything will get pulled up with it. So again, you don't need to be creative, you just have to focus on the names that you want to trade. Again, sometimes you have to dissect the market to see a technical analysis, play devil's advocate. I don't think this is the week for it. Again, let's stay conscious, let's stay hopeful, let's stay patient, right? Let's stay patient and let everything play out like we think, right? Might not, but like we think and give us the highest probability to achieve our goal. So let's talk about Friday's session again. Super duper aggressive. That's the best way of saying it. Super duper aggressive. Everything broke out, right? Well, I can't say everything, but everything gave us a high probability for the next leg to break out. So let's talk about this Netflix. This was a really good move. Netflix 553, 554 sneaky area, 558 macro needs to build. Here was Netflix. I still like it. I still like it a lot. Any dip on Monday, you gotta be a buyer in this thing instead of rising 60 minutes support. So it took out 53, this whole channel here. 53 took out this 57 and a half, 58. And now it is right here about the test, January, February, March, April. The April 20 highs, this whole 565 channel, this thing confirms 565. You should have its next leg up. So great move, really, really great move on Netflix. Amazon, okay, 334, 335 needs a strong build. Here comes Amazon right into the afternoon push, right? It took out this whole channel here, folks. That was the whole point. This whole channel here, it took out this 334, 335 level and traded into the 3350s. I think there's a couple of more areas that Amazon should test if the market continues to be strong, this 3360s and this 3380s level. Again, very, very strong option activity in that name. Very, very strong move. mRNA, very disappointing. I really thought that this week they were gonna test that 414 level. They threw bad news at it. They sold it off. They took it back up and they just never got back into this 414 level. All right, it is what it is. Zoom after impressive pivot to the upside that was on Thursday eventually got rejected in case it goes red, watch that 336 build. It never got there so we're still watching that 336 build. Square, 260, 260 below, it never got there. Roku, 351 builds below, never got there. For Friday's session we had longs and shorts because we kind of didn't know how the market was going to react after the whole headline in Afghanistan. So we just wanted to make sure we're protected on both sides of our game plan. Obviously, you saw the pivots to the upside, the ones to the downside obviously never confirmed and things started getting pretty aggressive. Coin got to 248, never confirmed. eBay, eBay was very, very strong. Here was the pivot on Thursday. 75 needs to build to get to a macro channel and then Friday's comment, 76 now needs to build for the earnings highs and eBay closed right at the highs, right? At the highs, the earnings highs. They should, any dip, again, any dip that confirms this 76.5, 77 level should start its next leg up on eBay. NVIDIA, 225, NVIDIA has just been a monster. Now that semi-conducted SMH is a stronger, it's gonna continue. So 225 needs to build. Well, yeah, it went to about 227 and changed, but look at this move here. I mean, who could really be disappointed with NVIDIA? Just an absolute monster. AMD, we talked about that 110 level throughout the week. 110 rejected twice on the daily needs to build. Here was AMD, right? It took out the 110, they got rejected several times. And now everybody see this? Now we got this whole macro channel. Remember, macro channel doesn't have to be 52 week highs. Macro channel just needs to be a major channel that distribution take to control. And whoever takes control of that supply area will obviously win. And that's why you could see here, AMD has been rejected through this channel several times. It also got rejected several times through this 110 level. So it finally took that out. And once it takes out this whole macro channel, there's a shot. This thing goes back to all-time highs. So a really strong move on AMD, taking on the way up. Hot, again, again, you don't need to trade Amazon and trade pivots. Hot, for small cap lovers, we always talk about how the options market dictates the underlining security. HUT, they were coming for the September 10 calls on repeat, one after another, after another, after another. So you don't even have to be an options trader, just to understand how important the options market is to the underlining security. So for small cap lovers, 720, 735 big spots, they're coming for the September 10 calls. Here was HUT, right? Here was HUT. So it took out the 720, took out the 735, and basically traded to about a little less than eight bucks. And you see here, after the close, it's ramping up a little bit. This thing looks higher.   But again, 735 on deck, there's been a massive seller. Coffee break. There's been a massive seller in Tesla. As you guys notice, it's been getting rejected off the 715 level, literally the whole week. There's been a massive seller there. They're trying to clean them up. Once they clean up the seller, and the craziest part about sellers is you don't know. You don't know how much stock they have. If I had a guess, and for all you guys who are watching the order flow with me throughout the week, the purse, I'm guessing it's a fund, they had to unwind two, three million shares of Tesla. It's been three, four days on the same channel, and they just can't get a, eventually they will clean them up, and once that does, Tesla's gonna wake up. So let's keep an eye on Tesla again. Does it have to happen this week? Not necessarily, but Tesla looks really, really strong. So let me give you guys some ideas for Monday. Again, I like Schwab a lot. Again, if the financials are strong, look at this channel here. You have a distribution that's going back for about three weeks here. If the financials are strong, Schwab looks really, really good. Also, in the financial space. Look at American Express, right guys? First close over the 50-day moving average. That's bullish, super bullish. If the AXP confirms, again, it has room all the way up to the 174 level, that looks really, really good. AMD, again, I like AMD a lot. If this thing takes out this whole channel here, this looks good, and a smaller name. Look at a smaller name. For all you guys who trade smaller names. Look at this ISEE, I have no idea anything about it. But if this thing starts taking out, it starts building a base, 1075, 11, man. You could get a next leg up. Again, here's the pull point. You see this 50-day moving average? Where I was talking about the last couple of symbols, like the IWM, like AXP, right? When you get above the 50-day moving average, it starts a really, really big cycle. So more of the story is any stocks, when you're doing your research this week, that comes and reclaims the 50-day on the close, should warrant your attention. But anyway, ISEE looks great as well. There's a whole slew of technology names that I'm obviously watching, especially on Dips, Facebook, Xilinx, Netflix, a ton, right? A ton. The key is take whatever you feel comfortable this weekend, whatever group you're focusing on, and do your macro research on that group. Have a safe Memorial Day weekend, guys. The video should be out next Monday, right? The weekend video should be out next Monday, and have a great trading week. Stay patient. Remember, you don't need to trade every day, but when you do trade, trade without it. You guys have a great day. Now we'll see you guys on Monday. Welcome to Access to Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to trading.


No pressure. Wow, that, here we go. All right, thanks, Brian. My name is Lisa Cuevas Shaw. I'm the Chief Operating Officer and Managing Director for COS, and let me also add my thanks to everyone for being here. So we have evidence to suggest that there is substantial room to improve the credibility and trustworthiness of research. We also understand that we have a dysfunctional reward system that carries incentives for individual success and arguably for institutional success that are focused on getting research published, not getting it right. The good news, as Brian walked through, is that we have viable solutions to correct the reward system, which some, and many of you here, are implementing, shaping, co-constructing, constructing, and developing. But the key question, as Brian teed up, was what's a viable strategy for changing research culture and practice at scale under these conditions? So at a high level analysis, we know the following. As Brian noted, these current solutions are embedded in our highly complex, largely decentralized system. We've got multiple actors working at different levels, global, regional, national, institutional, individual, all with different needs, motivations, interdependencies, levels of risk tolerance, different levels of access, inequities exist, different community norms. Despite that heterogeneity, there are two key assets across this complex system that we have. So we know there's evidence of shared values around the intent and the principles underpinning science and also around open science. As well, there have been a lot of science, particularly recently, the legitimation of these values through policy change and various similar signals, which is wonderful. Another key enabler, and it seems simple, but it can't go without saying, technological innovation. It is easier to practically solution workflow changes at scale than it ever has been before. And that's not to suggest that it's not complex or that it doesn't take a sizable and sustained investment in infrastructure, but it's definitely possible to realize efficiencies through advanced and networked technologies. Therefore, we have an opportunity to promote self-organization among communities within the system if we pursue what Mazarin Banaji referred to as behavioral realism. This argues that interventions or efforts to change the culture have to be guided by knowledge and current evidence of how people actually think and behave, not how we want them to think and behave or how we think they think and behave. In the early 60s, Everett Rogers introduced the diffusion of innovations theory to provide a process framework for understanding how an innovation and idea technology spreads through a population over time. Based on the theory, there are five key factors that influence that rate of adoption. So you have something called relative advantage. Is the innovation better than the status quo? Will researchers, research stakeholders perceive it as better? If not, the innovation is not going to spread that quickly. Compatibility. How does the innovation fit with research stakeholders' past experiences and present needs? If it doesn't fit both of those well, it will not spread well. Complexity, how difficult is the innovation to understand and apply? The more difficult, the slower the process. Trialability. Can researchers and stakeholders try out the innovation first? Or must you commit to it, must we commit to it, whole cloth? If the latter, people will be far more cautious about adopting it. And then lastly, observability. How visible are the results of using it? If researchers or we adopt it, can the difference be discerned by others? Again, if not, the innovation will spread more slowly. So from the point of view of the researcher, let alone the research stakeholders, contributors, all of us, there's quite a bit to consider with these factors when thinking about adopting open science practices. We know and we empathize with the range of barriers and challenges that some of these factors present. But this is where it's useful to consider another aspect of the diffusion of innovation theory, which identifies five categories of adopters. You have innovators, early adopters, the early majority, the late majority, and the laggards. These categories are based on the time it takes us to adopt a new innovation and the degree of risk we're willing to take to adopt it. For the purpose of this change effort, we change the language, we modify it just a little bit to make it fit for describing research culture change. So innovation refers to open scholarship practice or structural change that enables open scholarship. Early adoption is what we described earlier. Mainstream means that most in a particular scholarly community have adopted the practice or practices. And then establishing that standard means that culture change is pervasive, and it has brought most of the laggards along. So that all sounds well and good. And Roger's theory and other compatible innovation diffusion theories for that matter have demonstrated this relative adoption curve time and again. We've all seen it in technology, mobile phones, internet, in public health campaigns, in the business world with new products and services. But as Brian noted, we actually need an implementation strategy here. And starting and scaling the adoption of open behaviors, those innovations by researchers requires that systems-based approach. And it needs to be participatory and inclusive as well. But no strategy for change can expect to activate everyone all at one time. So in applying diffusion of innovations, we aim to catalyze and empower innovators and early adopters as the beachhead for change in a scholarly community. And we aim to do that by providing open infrastructure that makes it possible to do the behaviors, conducting user-centered product and process development to make it easy to do the behaviors, supporting grassroots organizations to activate early adopters and make their behavior visible to shift community norms towards the behaviors, offering and co-constructing solutions with all of you with stakeholders, journals, funders, publishers, institutions to be able to nudge those incentives to make it desirable to do the behaviors, providing and promoting a policy framework for stakeholders to make the behaviors required. And that effective policy implementation needs that infrastructure to make it possible. It also needs that community buy-in to make sure that the behaviors are deemed good practice, not just a burden. So this image would suggest that this is a nice, linear, sequential process. But these five levels are highly interdependent. They're in development simultaneously and interactively. That's what makes all the work fun. And each is necessary, none sufficient on their own, to sustain the change effort. So we don't want to give the impression that the relationship between the diffusion of innovation theory and the theory of change is a neat one-for-one relationship between the rates of adoption and the levels of intervention. But generally speaking, there is some connection between making it actually possible and even better easy to catalyze innovators. And generally speaking, there's a relationship between making it required and the practice becoming a standard one. But overall, this process is very dynamic, highly interdependent. So to illustrate this in action, we can take one example of a specific innovation or open behavior we want to scale and map it to this implementation strategy. So Brian had introduced the concept of lifecycle open science, and we already talked about publication being the currency of advancement or reward in our system. So let's take a look briefly at how the community started and is scaling change of our publication norms through the lens of preprints. Preprints are versions of scholarly manuscripts made publicly available before any formal editorial and peer review process. Ultimately, they aim to make research more quickly available to enable discovery and reuse. So this chart here shows the growth of preprints over time across some broad research categories. You have the natural sciences, physical sciences, life sciences, social and behavioral sciences, and the arts and humanities. Preprints are effectively a standard in physics and closely allied areas, and they've been popular in economics for a long time as well. Essentially, this chart shows growth in preprint output overall, and also that there are some disciplinary silos. Preprints have been popular in some domains for a long time, but didn't necessarily rapidly spread to other disciplines without effort. However, with technology advancements, active community engagement, and COVID-19 as a catalyzing external event, we can see that they have dramatically accelerated in the life sciences. And you could argue, well, a lot of that would be COVID-19. But again, arguably, if the community was not ready, if there was not infrastructure in place, I don't know that we would have seen this bump. There wouldn't have been that readiness. So why, how has this been happening? We'll walk through some, not all, of the milestones just to illustrate the theory of change in action. So in the Make It Possible intervention, the creation of BioArchive, I think it was in 2013, as a recognizable place for life sciences to do preprinting was a major milestone. There were other existing preprint services, but they were generalists, or they didn't feel like a particular home for life scientists, so they were disciplinary specific and only accessible to a narrow range of life science. In the Make It Easy intervention, you have publishers such as PLOS integrating submission of preprint with submission of article back in, this was 2018. And that made it easier from a workflow perspective and also validated, at least to some degree, the posting of preprints. And at this point, there are many other publishers who have done that, that has become a little bit more of a norm with publishers and the research process. Not shown here, but just to say, improvements to BioArchive to make it easier and easier to post, choose licenses, address whatever concerns people have about preprints while they share or consume them is making it easier. We're not there yet in terms of removing all of the complexities and the concerns, but indeed there's progress that's been made. For Make It Normative, a wonderful action and milestone to point to is the formation of ASAP Bio in 2017 and all of its community building efforts involving key champions, high credibility exemplars, early career researchers, you can see their fellowship program there. There's been a lot of public information campaign work. On the right hand side, you can see the amplification and network effect of signaling and legitimizing preprints via social media, largely in Twitter. This has enabled norm setting as well. In the Make It Rewarding intervention, NIH changing its biosketch policy to be inclusive of preprints, thereby legitimizing and actually rewarding this work product has been a great milestone. Journals have been evolving policies to at least be tolerant of preprints, some more encouraging than others. And funders, as you can see here, Cancer Research UK, but there are many others, all actively promoting preprints. Finally, in the Make It Required, you have to show a bolder publisher move, you have E-Life only reviewing papers that have been preprinted. You also have different funders such as CZI, Welcome Trust requiring preprints for some of their funding. Now, that all makes it sound as though growth in preprints in the life sciences has been easy over these past five to 10 years, but this has actually been a much longer effort and there is certainly work to be done. So this is not to say this is all nice and neat and tidy. Naomi Penfold and Jessica Polka addressed some of the existing technical and social challenges of preprint adoption in the life sciences and you can see them here. Many are not unique to the life sciences, but their work did call attention to our need to be sensitive to and address various disciplinary boundary conditions as well. The issues that they call attention to are highly compatible with the five factors affecting innovation adoption that we pointed to earlier. So there's certainly a lot of work to be done here, many questions to continue to address around preprints, but this gives you a sense of how diffusion of innovations and this theory of change anchored in behavioral realism can be applied. And more importantly, how can we use that framing to continue and improve on efforts or observe what's working and why or why not? So we began with the key question of what's a viable strategy for changing research culture and practice at scale when we've got this very entrenched dysfunctional reward system. The combination of diffusion of innovations and theory of change provides a framework for an evidenced and actionable implementation strategy with very specific levers that aim to address the realities that individual researchers face in this complex social and political and economic system. So thank you.


What's up everybody, Jayce here for jayspeakscasebreak.com just filled out 2020 gold rush autograph full-size baseball helmets It is a four box case break Random players number five. So 26 total spots are everybody gets two random teams from the players from the list below And then Aaron judge all the way down to the Jordan Alvarez Here you go Roll the dice and I am from Karen all the way down a regimen Then we doubled up your names to give you guys a total of the two players each and then Aaron judged on the Jordan Alvarez. Good luck guys. Let's roll it and we got a two and a two four times One two three And four Tyler That are Brandon. All right, here you go four times players one two three four times four times Jose Donna Chris Brian's That was Jose Ramirez All right, so this album says my customer name and you guys can see who you guys have much easier So Brandon you have a handful of them, but from Cody Ballinger. You got your daughter in there and Gary Sheffield Labor Taurus Mike Piazza Fred Lynn Vladimir grow junior Maddy Machado wander friend with Tom Glavin Calderon Jr. Bill Mazzaroski Roberto Alomar Addison Russell Jim Edmonds bull Jackson Sparky Lyle Trevor Jones, Chris Nealy and Chris Bryant Dan you have Trevor Hoffman Mike trout Jamie You have Victor Robes Walker Bueller Jason. You have Carlton Fitz Ayrton judge John You have Ozzie Smith Harman killer blue Wade Boggs and Reggie Jackson Karen steel with Jim Palmer Pete Alonzo Logan you have each row Andrew Jones Nicholas Stone you have letter mirror junior Nolan or not a regimen with John Smolzbury Larkin Sean with Charlie Sheen Frank Thomas and then Tyler Jose Ramirez yes, Remsky Andre Dawson for an touches junior Jim Tommy Alan Tremell goose gossage even Ivan Rodriguez one total Pete Rose Jeff Padwell Paul Goldschmidt And I'll give you a quick minute if you guys want to make any player trades. I wait no problem, man Love to get that cup done tonight. Definitely Remember guys $100 in break credit if you fill up that cup for the sabers around a number block customers All right Let's go to the trade window then stick with what you got Let's help ties it again by customers or players are and We're not a little smaller So you have the physical copy with it Mention Mike's added we talking about my shirts It's actually blue Like a navy blue you just can't see it And I have like five of these have five dark blue ones five black ones so You guys can see on Nick Cam over here. Hello The case is right there. I'm gonna bring one box at a time And we can you play who am I? So nothing else is sold out. Yeah, we have a lot of these guys. We could run it back as well Here's everybody It's in the break and all the players Joe did a couple with you guys, right?  Well, he actually does that's I could put the brown thing in there and I'm over and off Yeah, and the helmets should recycle I know we should use it. Yeah, maybe I'll just leave him one of those All right guys first one So it's actually a good one actually At least a player that I know of from this this era. I'll give that away All right guys, good luck All right, I am an active active MLB player A second baseman For a major league baseball team And I'm a youngster born December 13 1996 So active young second baseman and he guesses already No, Jay dog. He called off today So he should be back tomorrow if not Thursday I'm Venezuelan even even another clue Okay, one person's got it Made my debut on April 22nd 2018 and Through the 2019 season I got 62 home runs 167 RBIs and batting 275 and I'm a two-time all-star So my first two years in the league already a two-time all-star Anybody else Robert sorry Dennis. Sorry Ray Rice. Sorry Tyler. It's actually the only one that got it So far I Play for the New York Yankees And I am Glaber Torres Very nice. This is like one of those that kind of real helmets There's the CLA right there It's like one you can actually use in the batting cages if you really wanted to there you go Who has a Glaber Torres first of all Brandon does got 10 spots and rewarded at least with one helmet According to Wikipedia. He says he's a second baseman in shortstop I guess he should I guess I should have said short and shortstop My fault, but it started off with second baseman So I'm assuming his natural position is a second baseman. All right next one. Okay We have a Hall of Famer and Of course Not in MLB anymore, but a former major leaguer Hall of Famer Played with One two three four five different teams Born in 1971 Born in Puerto Rico And again 14 time all-star a world series champ in 2003 an AL MVP in 1999 NLCS MVP in 2003 13 gold glove award winner seven times silver slugger and I am a catcher Yeah, first ballot Hall of Fame in 2017 and There you go. Yes, TJ Robert Tyler. Yes Nickname Pudge Here you go Texas Rangers edition of Pudge. Oh Debates TJ saying best catcher of all time and Jeffrey saying no bench. I Guess I guess that's a debate. We can always go by. There's a JSA There you go. All right, Yvonne Rodriguez is going to Tyler. There you go Tyler Hit list yesterday Not hit list today though, man Well, what if somebody that says when it's all said and done it'll be like Buster Posey for what he's done in his first like I Don't know how long he's been in the league now, but what like eight years, maybe Could Buster Posey be one of the best catchers. All right, we hit one of these I hit we hit this guy Last time I remember see people can get it though. All right. I'm a former major leaguer Not a current Hall of Famer But played with eight teams from 1988 to 2009 again Played right field for most of his career, but also played left field third place shortstop handful of games at first place Played with the Brewers Padres Marlins Dodgers Braves Yankees Tigers and Mets was the first round pick of the Brewers Selected them sixth overall in 1986 and again batting average and his MLB career is 292 2600 hits over 500 home runs and over 1600 RBIs Again, it was a nine-time all-star World Series champion 97 five times over Slugger award and now batting champion 92 So we hit this guy the other day Which is? Gary Sheffield and it's Dodgers edition of Gary Sheffield here There's the JSA in there and Gary Sheffield is gonna be Brandon Another one for you Brandon last one So far this has been a good four bucks case though with that Glaber and Pudge Actually, I remember when I played baseball in high school It was like my sophomore year I bought some Pudge. I think it was Under Armour Under Armour cleats. They're actually pretty nice comfortable too. I think I could have been a good baseball player Looks like in high school, but I Just just I didn't really love it as much as I did other sports Last one I'm a former professional baseball player in the MLB, and I'm a Hall of Famer first ballot So you have another Hall of Famer in here. I'm in pitcher pitcher Played with one two teams my whole career Two teams my whole career guys or sorry. Yes, two teams my whole career. That's right two teams my whole career All right. No, Mariano No for Pedro and no for Maddox My win-loss record is 305 to 203 losses ERA of 354 I had 2600 strikeouts I'm a ten-time All-Star a World Series champ in 1995 1995 should give it away. I'm a two-time NL Cy Young Award winner World Series MVP Four-time Silver Slugger Award Five-time NL wins leader throughout the 90s and my jersey number 47 is retired by This team I played for the longest And I wore number 47 No anybody else Think people are getting a couple of braves, but not the right brave. There you go TJ Tom Glavin There's a JSA Right in there All right, Tom Glavin. Who has Tom Glavin?  This was break number five again number six is in the store You guys want to run it back. We still have a handful of these so let's get it going Jasky's case breaks down guys some good names in this case in this case Appreciate it guys


What is up you guys welcome back to another one if you are new to the channel I am Goldpony that's me on the screen right there. And so this year I've reviewed all the compact cars essentially I've test driven and reviewed the Civic Corolla and the Sentra and because the Civic and Corolla is the natural rivalry here I decided to switch it up and pin the Civic against the Sentra because I personally believe that the new Sentra being completely redesigned is actually a very good competitor for the Civic at this point And so in this video I am going to lay out the top 10 key differences between the Sentra and the Civic and hopefully It will better help you guys make a decision and by the way There will be a clear winner announced at the end of this video So make sure you watch till the end and let's go ahead and get started with number 10 on the list So number 10 on the list is going to be price the simple comparison between the Sentra and the Civic 2020 Civic LX being the bottom trim level starts at $20,650 2020 Sentra S starts at $19,090 so therefore the Sentra is going to start at a price of $1,560 less than the Civic but at the other end of the spectrum there If you were to spec out the very top trim level between the two the 2020 Civic Touring comes in at $27,700 2020 Sentra SR is going to start at $21,430 when you're comparing those two the Sentra is $270 less than the top trim level on the Civic so therefore Sentra is going to be winning the price comparison here, which puts us at one to nothing Sentra in the lead Next comparison I have for you guys is going to be reliability And so this is actually going to be an interesting comparison here and this one may surprise you guys consumer reports gives above-average Reliability to the Civic consumer reports then gives above average reliability once again to the Nissan Sentra So therefore we have a tie when it comes to reliability with consumer reports So therefore I had to check out JD power the other reliability ranking that I usually go to and consumer reports has them at a tie Basically JD power puts the Honda Civic the 2020 Honda Civic sedan at a 3 out of 5 rating By the way with JD power is predicted reliability here Nissan Sentra They put it at 3.5 out of 5 Having said that both do offer the same warranty being three year 36,000 mile bumper to bumper five year 60,000 mile powertrain But since the tie has to go to JD power here since consumer reports have them at the same Sentra is actually going to win the reliability comparison. Thanks to JD power which puts sentra in the lead to nothing Next comparison on my list is going to be Acceleration the fun one for me personally Two liter naturally aspirated inline four cylinder comes standard with the Civic that's going to give you 158 horsepower 138 pound-feet of torque sending you to 60 in approximately 8.2 seconds Then on the other hand the Nissan Sentra is going to give you once again a two liter naturally aspirated inline four cylinder 149 horsepower 146 pound-feet of torque zero to 60 approximately eight seconds flat according to motor trend That's the apple-to-apple comparison of course with the sentra only having one engine I can't compare it to the civics other engine But the civics does indeed have another engine setup being a 1.5 liter turbo charged inline four cylinder This is going to be available on the ex trim level and up which starts at $23,800 so it's priced well above the top trim level of the sentra already there But if you wanted to go that route 174 horsepower 162 pound-feet of torque zero to 60 in 6.7 seconds, which is pretty darn good for the civic really any compact car for that matter But this one there for them becomes a more difficult one to judge So again when you're comparing apples to apples the sentra is going to win that comparison But if you wanted to spend approximately $2,500 more to get the 1.5 liter turbo charged engine in the civic Then obviously that would win because the Nissan sentra at this time at least has nothing to compare it to So since the sentra won the base comparison and the civic won the upgraded engine comparison because the sentra doesn't have an Upgraded engine. I do like that. It's offered though. So I'm going to have to call this one a tie for that reason Two to nothing sentra is still in the lead Then for the number seven comparison on my list being braking because braking is equally important This is important because if you're using this as a commuter car And you need to come to a quick stop and rush hour on your way to or from work You're going to want to know that the brakes are going to actually make that happen for you because braking can differ Substantially amongst compact cars. Let me tell you and so this is going to be judged by the 60 to 0 stopping distance in terms of feet So let me first start with the Honda civic you get 11.1 inch ventilated front disc 10.2 inch solid rear disc As far as that 60 to 0 distance goes it comes in at a whopping 113 feet Which is actually Very impressive for a compact car when it comes to the Nissan sentra That gives you 11 inch ventilated front disc 10.2 inch solid rear disc pretty similar to the civic there coming in It is 60 to 0 distance of 114 feet One foot difference there. It is very very similar cars when it comes to braking. Let me tell you but Civic does win this one by hair. So that puts it at two to one center still in the lead For number six on the list We will be comparing seat comfort in terms of rear legroom at least and the options available for this seating So when it comes to rear legroom first, the civic gives you 37.4 inches very impressive for a compact car Nissan sentra gives you 34.7 inches switch the four in the seven I suppose which means the civic does have good bit more rear legroom than the center is going to give you At the other thing to go along with that rear ventilation is going to come standard on the civic where it is not even Offered on the Nissan sentra. So therefore the rear passenger seat comfort Clearly goes to the civic then let's take a look at the seating options because both will offer power adjustable front seats Both offer heated front seats Both offer leather front seats. The cool thing about Nissan's leather front seats though Is that Nissan actually offers a quilted leather which is carried over essentially from their Nissan maxima A lot of times you will find quilted leather on vehicles like Audi for instance. They're known for that They probably pioneered that really the auto industry I would say but still a very high-end leather look when it comes to the Nissan sentra Both do offer the same thing though in terms of options So since the civic won the rear legroom comparison this one again We'll have to go to the civic tying us all up at two to two Then for number five in the list We will be comparing fuel economy a very important one Especially if this is going to be your commuter car when it comes to Honda civic with that two-liter naturally aspirated inline four cylinder 30 miles per gallon in the city 38 on the highway comparing apples to apples You will get 29 in the city 39 on the highway for the sentra for the s and s v trim levels If you want with the s r-term level the top-term level there You're going to come in at 28 in the city 37 on the highway So if you're going to be doing more city driving perhaps the civic is your better bet there But if you're going to be doing more highway driving if you go with the s and s v trim levels for the sentra That's going to give you better mpgs But again, the civic has that extra engine option being the 1.5 liter turbocharged engine If you were to go that route spending a little bit more money there, but if you did that 32 in the city 42 on the highway and either of these engines whichever way you go will take regular Unletted fuel to cheap stuff 87 octane essentially there So since you get better city mpgs with the civic and since the highway number was kind of split Depending upon the trim level that you go with I'm going to have to give this one to the civic because the fact that the upper engine choice does give you better mpgs there as well Three to two civic is in the lead Now let's go ahead and take a look at cargo space And this is a pretty important one when it comes to compact cars The Honda civic is going to give you 15.1 cubic feet good bit there Nissan sentra gives you 14.3 cubic feet either car that you go with gives you a 60 40 split meaning the Receipts do fold down for definitely a good bit of space with either setup that you go with But civic is going to edge out the wind here once again giving our tally at four to two Honda civic is breaking away here Number three in the list is going to be interior quality and again this one may surprise you guys Power moonroof is available for both dual zoom climate control available for both However with the climate control I did want to say the three circular air vents found in the Nissan sentra The air vents found front and center very reminiscent of an Audi esque type of setup Or even Mercedes Benz is known for doing those three circular air vents kind of reminiscent of a fighter jet That's where they originally got that from but I love that style air vents. It looks very high in there Leather wrap steering wheel available for both the center actually gives you a sporty flat bottom steering wheel Whereas the civic does not that's pretty cool Also a heated steering wheel is available on the center where it is not available on the civic Which is kind of surprising considering how much more pricey the civic actually is so that was pretty interesting When it comes to leather seating again the Nissan sentra gives you quilted leather at a price of $23,655 Leather seating for the civic you are going to have to bump that up to $25,000 if you wanted to go with the leather seating there And food taming screen as far as that goes It's placed high up on the dash if you were to go with the sentra like Audi does for instance However with the civic it's kind of integrated into the dash so essentially in the end when I'm trying to get at This is the center offers more things that the civic just does not like quilted leather a flat bottom steering wheel heated steering wheel And overall interior quality in the end. I actually have to give this one without a doubt to the Nissan sentra And so that now puts our tally at four to three Civic is still in the lead And for a number two comparison another very important one here comes down to safety And so let me first start with IIHS and so both the center and the civic will both be an IIHS Top safety pick which means they're both extremely safe vehicles right off the bat But both of them do have to come equipped with led headlights in order to get that safety rating and we'll say that Blind spot monitor with your cross traffic alert comes standard on the sentra If you wanted to get that same thing you will have to go with the extram level and upspend $25,000 to get it on the civic And that's going to essentially be available via Honda Lane watch They have a little different setup to the blind spot monitoring system there But standard safety features on both you get a ton of advanced safety features either where you go Including forward collision warning lane departure warning automatic emergency braking just to name a few and again Both are very safe vehicles But the key difference here is the Nissan sentra earned that top safety pick for $6,270 less And I came to that because only the top trim levels of both the civic and the sentra Actually will get those led headlights So since the sentra is so much more inexpensive than the civic when it comes to the top trim levels at least And that blind spot monitor actually comes standard for every trim level of the sentra as opposed to just the ex $25,000 trim level and up I am going to have to give this one yet again to the sentra tying us up Once again at four to four And so for my last comparison to draw the winner in this comparison It is going to come down to handling and ride quality And so let me start with both come standard with an independent strut type front suspension independent multilink rear suspension Which is brilliant for the sentra because it didn't used to be that way They just brought back the independent rear suspension for the 2020 model year. So that's great Both offer good ride quality. I remember saying that in both of my reviews Which by the way, I'll leave a link to both individual reviews at the end of this video Both offer a nice weightier steering feel which is a good thing It gives more of a direct response when you're going around the bends Honda's been great at this for quite a while. I will say that sentra for 2020 Is now just as good as the civic in my opinion again I test drove both of them tie breaker is going to have to go to the stabilizer bars And that's going to assist with handling as well And here's why I say that front and rear stabilizer bars come standard on all sentra trims Front and rear stabilizer bars come standard on the sport trim level and up of the civic Therefore their stabilizer bars are not available on the lower lx trim level for some reason So therefore I have to give the win here to the one that provides stabilizer bars on all trims Being the Nissan sentra once again Therefore in the end the Nissan sentra wins this comparison Five to four and so if I had to add one more category to this comparison Though I would have to add exterior styling although exterior styling is somewhat subjective I did want to mention this because the sentra would win again in the exterior styling department At least for me it is wider and lower than the civic which makes it much more aggressive much better-looking vehicle Civic width comes in at 70.9 inches the center width comes on at 71.5 inches as far as ground clearance goes 6.7 inches for the civic 4.9 inches for the sentra a much lower vehicle more connected to the road for better handling So that's pretty cool Overall though even though the sentra won my particular comparison that doesn't necessarily mean that it's the right pick for you For example, if you wanted more power with the civics turbocharged engine go that route because the center doesn't provide one of those Also better fuel economy with that engine or if you wanted more rear leg room or more cargo space The civic beats the center in all of those categories So if you needed any of those the civic may indeed be the better pick for you And so overall I do hope you guys got something out of this video. Hopefully it helps you make a decision of your own I've personally owned three Honda civics. I've never owned a Nissan center. I've always loved my civics They've always gone over 200,000 miles with my top one going 230,000 before I ended up trading again And so both are super solid vehicles, but nonetheless, let me know which one you would pick in the comments section below I'm curious to hear your thoughts which one you would actually pick but in the end Do appreciate you guys watch if you're free to follow me on social media the bottom of the screen there If you like be sure to hit the subscribe and the bell notification button If you're in the new car reviews that is what we do here on this channel after all And I do appreciate you guys watching more than you know when I will see you guys all in the next video Stay Gold


Last year, astronomers were puzzled when Betelgeuse dramatically faded, but then recovered. The dimming lasted for weeks. Hubble found that the dimming corresponded to a gaseous outflow that formed dust, which briefly obstructed some of Betelgeuse's light from our view, creating the dimming effect. Now astronomers have discovered that the red hypergiant, Vy Canis Majoris, which is far larger, more massive, and more violent than Betelgeuse, experienced much longer, dimmer periods that will last for years. New findings from Hubble suggest the same processes that occurred on Betelgeuse are happening in this hypergiant, but on a much grander scale. Here we see some of the structures close to the star that are relatively compact knots. By using Hubble to determine the velocities and motions of the close-in knots of hot gas, astronomers were able to date these eruptions much more accurately. They found that many of these knots link to multiple dimming periods in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when Canis Majoris faded to one-sixth its usual brightness.


Good morning everybody! How you guys doing today? I hope you guys are doing good. I have started a new series on my channel and I'm decluttering my makeup collection and I'm really hopeful that this is going to free it up so I can get more creative and be less overwhelmed with the amount of stuff. So we're gonna go through everything, it's probably gonna take some time, but I'll show you the whole process and I love watching these so I hope that you guys will enjoy watching mine as well. If you have any tips or anything, let me know. So this is one of my more organized drawers. This is my blush, bronzer and highlighting drawer and a lot of the stuff in here I think is probably out of date by this stage. I also just want to downsize how much I own so I think the first thing to do is just to remove everything and see what we have. So let's start with the cheek and lip stains. I used to use these all the time and I just kind of got out of the habit of using them. This brand Me Me Me when they first launched here in Ireland I was obsessed with them. I used to use them all the time and I think that's why I kept these for so long.  Then I have the body shop lip and cheek stains and you know what I love is that there's one of these that has a rosy kind of glow rather than all of those reds and oranges. So this is Dusty Rose. Unfortunately they discontinued it which I'm like the body shop bring this back we need this. I don't want my cheeks to be red. I want them to be glowy. Now if you've never tried lip and cheek stains what I would recommend is getting minis. So benefit usually around the holidays will have little mini collections. See how often you use them before buying the larger ones. A friend of mine she's them every single day so she buys at least two a year but for everybody else if you're just testing them out get the mini sizes. I actually prefer cream blushes over tints. Now I feel that they're just easier to use so I have the Maybelline Cheek Heat. Then I also have the Primark Super Cheeky Tints. These were from their K-pop collection that they had. So what I want to do is I'm probably gonna give them to my sister and I'm going to keep the Maybelline ones myself. I think my sister's gonna get some good use out of these guys. This is the Stila Cream Blush. I think it was a blush. I'm not actually quite sure I used it as a blush. I really liked the way that this looked on the skin. I didn't use it that often however and it's probably out of date by this stage but what I am going to do is I'm going to de-pan it so I'm going to take the pan out and then I can use the packaging as a mirror and maybe store a little sponge in there because the packaging is beautiful. I don't want to get rid of that. Also in that K-pop collection that Primark had were the Bubble Blushes. These are so pigmented. They're unbelievable. They look like cotton candy. Like they're so intense and beautiful. What I actually use these for is for face charts because they're pretty much out of date by this stage but I can still use them as kind of paint, you know. But they're so cute. Look at them. Look at the packaging. Beautiful. This highlighter was one of my absolute favorites. It's a dose of color highlighters but some things happen to this. Not having that good payoff. It's gone really chalky. I think it might actually be expired so that's why we're not getting payoff like we used to. But I'll see what I can do. The Balm Menizer Sisters. This palette is my everyday go-to as you can tell. It's a little dirty. I love the combination of these three shades and I just love having it all in one place which is great. A drugstore highlighting palette that I think is amazing is the L'Oreal one. This has warm and cool which is great. So you have a warm palette and a cool palette. This is the warm one. I love the fact that they actually made a warm and cool because a lot of brands just give you a highlighter. Sleek. Oh, sleek. The brand Sleek just has a special place in my heart and do I even need to say anything? Can we just look at this?  Yeah, we're definitely keeping those. Just to even just look at. They're beautiful. Another blush that I absolutely love is by Pixie and I love the little detail that they have on this. I love the fact that it has the Pixie Glow across the top and then it has like a shadowing effect from the way that they've pressed into the blush. Awesome packaging. Love them. If you're looking for a drugstore highlighter that's not too highlighting, I would recommend the True Match one. I believe again, it also comes in a few different shades which is nice but it doesn't look super intense. It just adds a glow rather than a highlight to your skin and I also love the packaging because it's a really big mirror in here which is really handy. Lancome iridescent rosy glow blush. This just brings me back to being a kid. I just love this. You'll have all of these little capital letters in the different shades and you kind of swirl your brush around. It adds like a beautiful glow but you know what I was thinking? I was looking at this and I was like see all those ease. I want to take all those ease and maybe like crush them down and put them with some oil and then just use it as like a body highlighter. How beautiful would that be? I just feel like a kid when I look at this and I love it. It's so cute. Next up I have their Rimmel blushes. I always like to have a blush from each brand and I love the combination of mixing these two together. The one on the left is quite pigmented so a little goes a long way and then the other one on the right has more of a sheen so I think the combination of the both of them work really well together. Love it. Note cosmetics, highlighting bronzers. These have a few different shades and I also have a blush from them as well. I don't use the bronzers that much but I love the blush. Look how beautiful the shade is but I did realize that I also have a Clarins one as well. So it's torn between which one I want to keep because I really do need to downsize what I own. So I'm looking at these and I don't know. Which one do you think looks the best? I don't know. We'll have to decide later. Urban Decay Naked Illuminators. I love these. These are great for the body. Not so much for the face. I don't usually use them on my face but I use them on my body. But the Space Powder, wow, wow, wow. I just love how glittery this is. It's so pretty. Actually, I had a bunch of kids who were going through my makeup case and they were like, can we have some of this? Can you put some of this on? And I think that's fine to put some glitter on, you know. I think one of them might have ripped this open but that's fine. Moving on, I have the Mac Blush and I've had this for quite a long time but I'm not getting rid of it. I love it. Wet and Wild Highlighting Powders. There's not much I can say other than they're brilliant. They're so inexpensive. They're just so beautiful. Seriously, I think they're like, what, $3.99? And look at that. People need to talk about their highlighters a lot more. The Balm Mary Luminizer. This has a very special place in my heart. This is my mom's favorite. I love it. It's so beautiful on the skin. I'm also a big fan of their blushes and their bronzers because they're so workable. I can build them up but I can have like a subtle glow or kind of build them up and they just look beautiful on the skin. I also have the Hot Mama Blush. Now, I don't like this on myself but I love it on older skin which is unusual because you tend to wear like mats, you know, on older skin but this sheen looks amazing. I use it on my mom. She loves it. I think it looks amazing on her. She's the Hot Mama. She deserves a Hot Mama blush. She'll kill me for saying that. For my makeup kit, I use the Lancome Oil-Free Powder Blushes. I have a few different shades of these. Beautiful to use and look fantastic. I'm really long-lasting again so for my makeup kit, I use these. I do leave the little brush in the side because when I take it out, I feel like the palette looks really naked and I don't like it. It's like wearing shoes without socks, you know? It just makes me uncomfortable. Also in my makeup kit, I have the Cream Blushes from NARS so we have the original shade which I've been probably using the most.  I just don't say that word. And then I also have the Rush. I have Darling and Scandalous. These are beautiful to use. I have the Pixi Glowy powders. Now I always keep these in the box until I've actually used them and I use them on people and then if they really like them, I'll just be like here and put them back in the box and then they can take it home with them. Next I have the Bronzer Highlighter and Blush from Benefit. These are the ones that I use the most often and you know what? I've actually been using the Light, the Hula Light the most. I love this. I'm surprised it isn't talked about more. It's a really beautiful powder, particularly on my paler skin. It just adds a very subtle hint which I love. So I think I know what I'm keeping and what I'm giving away so let's put what we're keeping back in the drawers. So that's all the decluttering that I'm going to do today. Make sure to check the information box and I'm also going to like link it on the screen to see the other videos in this series. I hope that you enjoyed it. As always, be kind to yourself, be kind to others and I'll see you in the next one.