What's up everybody, Jayzian for Jaspys casebreaks.com. We just sold out our Jaspys 7 box national football mixer With 2018 NT first off the line box plus a 1984 tops football cello box random teams guys Again, this was supposed to be breaking live at the national didn't feel but we filled it here back in Hermosa All the national breaks have gotten here From the truck and again guys 32 total spots. Everybody gets a random team the NFL all-card ship Chase Josh Allen monster RPAs and first off the line say some chase and Dan Rino's John Alway rookies and A super clean BBC E sealed box of 1984 tops football Cello box and again one box of NT first line 84 tops football cello box one box of XRC 2020 prison team all leaf valiant hip parade football autograph helmet and gold rush mini-hunt specialty So there you go guys and again congratulations to the customers. I want these in Phyllis from prison one Two and three and four actually I should say one two three four everybody else bought in straight up Let's roll the dice six and three nine times. Good luck one two three four five Come on load five six seven It was uploaded separately all over one two three four five six seven eight Down to the Jacksonville Jaguars Also, I already got the bucks Joshua with the Washington football team Chris with the Texans Sean with the Vikings Oh, there is Sean Maddock with the 49ers Bennett with the Broncos Nick with the Lions Sean with the Tennessee Titans Adam with the Cowboys Aaron with the Saints Adam Coverman with the Seahawks Bennett with the Colts Mack you have the Chiefs Aaron with the Giants Benjamin with the Dolphins Jonathan with the Panthers Adam with the Patriots Sean Allure with the Rams Eric with the Steelers Aaron with the Cardinals Patrick with the Falcons Aaron Billingsley with my Eagles Brittany have the Bills Adam with the Chargers Coverman Sean Maddock with the Raiders Eric with the Packers Joshua with the Bears Solomon with the Bangles Martin with the Jets Sean Allure with the Browns Dylan with the Ravens and Patrick K with the Jacksonville Jaguars Now if anybody wants to trade, I'll give you guys a quick minute Pretty much every single box break in this one is pretty quick The only one that's gonna take a little time is a sell a box And I think I might have underestimated my time. So if this actually runs over like 30 40 minutes Sean will probably have to just do the rest of the breaks that are on the list Just because I feel like this might take a little too long the football sell I'm plugging out there Try to do No, no, it's because the packs it's hard. They're hard to rip and I need to do them carefully too. I'm sorry about that Chris Hopefully we can get you something nice though That way you can just sell it, you know, it's just the way the randomizer lands sometimes Just close it. All right, so I'll start off with the sell a box right here guys and again it is a baseball Cardi's change Certified right here letting you know it's a 1984 tops sell a box football And it is in pretty good condition The fact that we're gonna rip one of these is pretty amazing. It's how some fun Obviously, I never really got to rip these as a kid because I was not born in the 80s, but Maybe for you older guys, it'll definitely reminisce, right? Rip these back in the 80s as a kid 59 cents guys back in the day Brian Holloway James Lofton Billy Johnson checklist Steve Freeman Dan Fouts Butler There's the bubble gum, which I'm not going to be eating I don't know who else is a rookie in his class that is worthy of pennies leaving top loading If anybody does know You know, just tell me if I'm missing anything I'm proud. I mean that that gum doesn't look bad though. Like But I'm definitely not gonna eat that. Yeah, it looks like the gums in the middle of all the packs Chris Collins worth. How about that? I? Kind of want to add I'm like deep down. I'm thinking man. That'd be kind of cool to try the gum But no, I'm probably gonna get sick like it That's pretty hard. It's pretty hard Even broke off already I'll put them to the side Maybe we can ship you some of these we're gonna have enough to ship everybody one of them actually technically There's at least enough 30. There's at least 32 packs Centering on these are a little rough too. I wasn't really needing to be doing something tomorrow and being a Being at a little celebration. I wouldn't I'd probably eat one just in case I got sick, but I can't Joe Montaigne, I feel like Joe Montana's worthy, right? Oh, it's your devil Bronco Rick Carlos How we got a top of the gun. I know right? It's a must the fact that you can get this many cards in a cello box, and there's only 59 cents a pack Like quick. So like I think even a PSA nine It's high still sell really what I think a PSA eight Marino. I think I actually sold one to Jasper He goes around a hundred bucks a hundred and fifty, so I Mean look at the centering on this good Lord. I will I'll leave it for him I'll leave him a couple Harold Carmichael stride Hall of Famer Ron Jaworski Kurt Warner Seahawks running back Jim Plunkett so far guys. How many Marinos and always are you guaranteed in a box? There you go. This is John. Oh, hey, Sunring's not too bad I've seen much worse in this box so far Broncos That's going to Bennett They're real rookie right there Murphy Coleman. I Like that kind of party Mark Singleton Mike Singletary You get a email notification Once we print out a label for your order or break So, yes, you will get an email confirmation Or if you whatever you provide it if it's an email on your order you provided a phone number It'll you'll get they'll get a text so you'll get an email Double check your spam as well You know we ship out between three to five business days The national stuff just got here today. So everything from the National Friday Saturday Sunday We'll go out over the weekend and you know if it ships out tomorrow Which would be Saturday it's probably gonna get stuck here in LA because Sunday the post office is closed. So by Monday You know, it'll be out for sure see there Yes, the national stuff got here today IG was able to pretty much ship out a little bit of it, but if not the rest will go tomorrow All of I just gone there you go case breaks will go out Monday just because tomorrow We print out the labels. It's just gonna get stuck till Monday morning. Anyways Again, appreciate it guys, of course, you know, we had to drive all that stuff back.  No problem Of course any national break that happens today. Well, I Sorry here Pretty Solomon how we Stuck on the back of this guy Wilbur Montgomery nice another my quick there it goes Fred Dean looks like it's tackling Marina Joe Montana There you go. Oh my god. Damn, Reno cheeses. I was hoping for a better cut, but hey, no little damn, Reno, baby Dolphins going to Benjamin That John how it looks so much better looking at this one. Hopefully we got a couple more of those in here Our printer Phil Sims, that looks pretty cool And the centering on this is great Joe Montana Herman Edwards coach Edwards right there Joe Dyson. I guess we're almost Halfway there, I believe Dickerson's also Doug Marden I'm also house to Doug Marden out like another Eight packs left Walter Peyton, that's pretty cool. They're in the last handful of packs Hopefully get into the marina on the L way Maybe some nicely centered ones as well. I already four packs left. All right three left. Come on the last two packs Last pack mojo. Good luck guys. Wow. Okay. Only one marina one L way.  I was hoping a lot more though I don't know how many are on average come out But at least we got one of each would have been a bummer if we didn't get any Let's put this till we hear to the side See what I do with all this gum We'll go get some of the teddy. See if teddy wants one Let's continue on guys So remember this is a seven box break so Let's go with a little prism team all We'll do the helmets after the boxes and then we'll leave the last one to be actually just NT first off the line Said a big rookie here. That's what we need to do right now Big rookie Kelly silver as a culture Chicago Bears Not a rookie Khalil Mack so if it wasn't a rookie, it was gonna be out of 49 10 out of 49 and culture was these silver Let's go leave valley in 2018. So again, if there is a checklist on group break checklist We're gonna go by that if there isn't then we're gonna go by the teams that they're currently on in the NFL I call it rules apply They might have a checklist on group break checklist, but I Don't remember too much. Oh Let's actually check it out really quickly. It's not we have to go by current teams Yes, there is a checklist. It looks like sweet So Yes, 2018 perfect. So we're to go by this checklist right here. All right guys First one we have is Luke Falk I was who 825 Luke that is for the Titans six-round draft Mark Walton out of 60 He goes fourth round pick or guys we want to bake your Mayfield more than anything in this product and product back until the 18 But how about a Josh Allen? Midas touch Two out of 25 That is Buffalo Bills Just actually just got paid to Brittany. There you go. Congratulations. Very nice Very very sweet Josh Allen right there Color match to with Wyoming I'm just sweet So we want to get in first off the line, but hey, I'll take this for now There's Josh Allen and the last one here is Midas touch Mason Rudolph 9 5 10 7 out of 35. That's gonna be for the Pittsburgh Steelers He was going to Ericsson's all very nice successful box. That's exactly what we want to hear right now Let's go XR football Yeah, big one right here two thick ones actually Gallimore, Novan Gordon, Miles Sanders Darrington Evans at a 249 and another Darrington Evans at a 75 Claypool and McFarland Jr. Catches there for the Pittsburgh Steelers Pittsburgh for Eric and Brian Edwards luminous endorsements Conn Dugart first water Lawrence Josh huge Fitzpatrick Jerry Rice and Jalen Rager to 149 for my Eagles Fly goes fly Aaron Billingsley Let's go to the two helmets autograph football mini helmet It's gonna go by whatever NFL logo is on the helmet if it's collegiate it'll go by college rules Team they're currently on or to the place of the longest and it looks like it's a Jaguar helmet. Oh Nelly Could it be who I want it to be? Fred Taylor, I think it is Fred Taylor. I think it's Fred Taylor Fred Taylor Yeah, this There you go Fred Taylor for the Jaguars It's gonna Patrick K Little mini helmet right there autographed that gets you away Let's go with the next helmet, which is 2020 Gold Rush mini helmet specialties.  This is a nice helmet. That's for sure And my ego is almost traded for this guy to Sean Watson not not in the best Place right now, but that is a nice helmet though for the Texans Houston Texans gonna Chris Maxwell Las Palmojo that is a chrome alternate to Sean Watson See how everything gets resolved there with him Last but not least guys first off the line National Treasures football Lego, so we'll be a big one guys. I could feel it. We're hitting a big rookie quarterback Little snap. I missed that. I miss it First off the line guys It's a thickie as well. First one is Mike Ulster To 99 Johnny United's had a five. That's pretty sweet Colts with that one Reggie white. That's pretty sweet as well. We're getting some sweet cards out of 99 Packers More Packers Marcus Valdez Scanling and Jamal Moore to 99 Packers. That's Eric Two-color patch here tremendous treasures. That is Harrison Smith number to 25 We have a quad patch Kelvin Ridley Edo Smith DJ Moore and Trey Kwan Smith quad relic So actually Cardinals would be or sorry falcons would be Patrick Carolina would be Jonathan and Saints would be Aaron so it'll be a little randomizer at the end of the break and let's start going to some autographs guys Good luck. That is will disley for the Seahawks see how I was going to add in government carry on Johnson rookie jumbo signatures One two three four color patch Detroit Lions number to 99 Not to go slider box for this But that's Detroit Lions going to Nick Antonio Brown why I hardly ever see any Antonio Brown on card autographs For the Steelers Eric's and solid that is five out of ten Zocker actually ain't bad and actually guys the last one is a redemption I don't know which rookie actually is a redemption in this. I totally forgot We're gonna find out right now. It's got to be a big rookie, right? Rookie patch autographs stars and stripes. That should be I got a 20 or something Part number 168 First with an M Mike Mike white. I'm gonna do that. Is that the quarterback for the Cowboys? Is that the quarterback for the Cowboys? Oh, that is cold Cowboys. God damn it Geez Well, we got a Josh Allen at least in Valley, but I was hoping to Josh Allen here Would have been nice to get my Mike white in Valencia. I know it's gonna be Cowboys in this, but yeah You still get at the bottom And it's I mean stars and stripes. I mean if you're saying he's the backup. Well, that's not bad then what it's like, you know Something something happens to the starter, right? Well, of course it is expired, but if they have it, of course, they'll give it to you You get a replacement Well, either way still a nice break though regardless Here we're pretty much the bigger hits right the Mike white right there Antonio Brown to 10 You got these nice patches and relics out of five Johnny unites We did get a Josh Allen, which is still pretty sweet on card from valiant And of course, we got a couple rookies here. We did end up getting a John Elway and a Dan Marino So really appreciate it guys And let's do this randomizer so I don't have anything else to randomize Remember you guys are automatically part of the national promo as well for getting a spot in this Once we sell out all the promo breaks you'll be able to you know Win some money So here's a dice roller. Let's get a new fresh dice roller and Let's put the customer names in here. Oh, sorry the teams I should say Falcons Falcons Panthers There you go roll Six and a five eleven times team a number one gets the quad one two three four five six seven eight nine ten Saints was the Saints that is a a wrong They go a little consolation getting something here So appreciate it guys Again, we are just two breaks away from selling up the national promo if you guys do want to get that done Check out the website jazby's case breaks calm 16 spots away eight spots away from killing the promo guys appreciate it Jason sign out here


Hello. Welcome to this session. This is a little bit unusual. I thought I'd be at the conference. Then everyone was told it's going to be from home. And then when I was prepared to do a conference session from home, I got a call from my father that he needed me there. So I'm actually doing this talk from my childhood bedroom, which is kind of unusual. But it's a good room actually related. This is where I met my first computer and it's still around. So this is where I have my current computer and my first computer together for the first time in a long time. I guess most people who are interested should be in by now. So we can get started. This talk is obviously going to be about tool chains and cross compilers and what has changed. Because not everything is the same. It used to be some 20 years ago. So the current situation when it comes down to tool chains, cross compilers and everything is that there's one really well-known, well-documented, slightly complicated way to build it all. Which is, of course, get binutils, get GCC, get G-Lipsy, build them all in the right order and build them again to get all the features. We'll get back to that in a bit. And there's also a couple of alternatives, but not a lot of people are aware of them or not a lot of people have used them. They're certainly not as widely known as the traditional way. And we're going to take a look at what those alternatives are, where it makes sense to use them and where it makes sense to stay with the traditional way of doing things. So the best known way is obviously to grab binutils, then GCC, build a minimal GCC compiler for your target platform that has only seen nose reds, probably no support for shared libraries. Then you build G-Lipsy. And then when you are done with that, you build GCC again, enabling a few more features, including Libre CDC++ if you want C++ support, including threading, and all the other advanced compiler features you may need. LTO is another thing that's usually not in the first stage compiler. And of course, this approach still has some advantages. It's by far the most widespread. Most of the first third-party libraries and applications have been tested in this setup. It's what's at the core of almost every at least desktop distribution or server distribution out there. Some embedded devices have gone another way already, but most of those devices are devices where you don't actually get to look at what they're doing. And of course, along with that, comes the fact that people you are talking to on IRC mailing forms have done this and will be able to help you out with any problems there. You will probably also find people to help out with alternatives, but they may be a bit harder to find. So let's take a look at what some of the alternatives are. First, you will need a compiler, which is GCC and the traditional option. There's one compiler that is equally good, which is Clang, which comes from the LLVM suite. LLVM also has replacements for binutils, so you can skip the binutils step as well. In LLVM, before version 10, that was a bit complicated because the linker that came with it just wasn't good enough and couldn't replace LD, but in LLVM 10 that has changed, you can build pretty much everything with LLVD these days. So if you're opting for Clang, you don't really need binutils anymore. Oh, and before I forget, there is the Q&A session that you can see. In the default setup, it's under the video window. Feel free to type questions there at any time. Interrupt me when you feel like it. I can't guarantee that I'll notice it immediately, but I'll try to answer questions in a timely manner. Okay, back to the topic. Yeah, LLV has become good enough to replace binutils, so instead of compile binutils and then compile GCC, you can opt to just compile LLVM and Clang. One of the interesting things about Clang is that it's a cross compiler by design, so with GCC and a lot of other compilers, you have to build a compiler once for every target you want to support, whereas Clang can be built for any supported platform at the same time. So unless you want to, you don't build all the platforms at the same time. You don't build different compilers for all the platforms. You just build all the targets you want into one Clang compiler and then you specify clang-target with the triplets you want to support and then the same version of Clang will build the binary for whatever architecture you're targeting with the dash-target switch. Another advantage of Clang is that its code is a lot easier to get into than GCCs, so if you are interested in hacking on the compiler itself but you are not already a GCC expert, it is much easier to get started in the Clang world. So we have a question on the channel, which is better with respect to time between GCC and Clang. That is a question that is hard to answer because it kind of depends on the code you are using it on. There used to be the situation that in general Clang would be much faster at compiling things, but GCC would produce faster binaries. That has changed a bit as Clang has been adding more optimizations. It got a lot slower at compiling things, but the binaries got a lot better. So these days I'd say they are roughly the same speed, both at compiling and at running the stuff that was compiled. I hope that answers the question. If not, please post a follow-up. Okay, getting back to what Clang can do. It has a lot of targets, so does GCC, but Clang has some interesting additional things like targets for various GPUs. So that's interesting, especially if you're trying to do anything where you're trying to split workloads between the CPU and the GPU. Yeah, we already covered the next point in the question. There are special cases where one compiler will perform better. On average, the performance is similar. Clang is trying to be a drop-in replacement for GCC, so it implements a lot of GCC extensions. If you have some code that was not developed for standards in mind, that was developed only for GCC, there's a good chance it will work with Clang anyway. Not a 100% chance, but a pretty good one. Clang was initially released in 2012, so it's eight years old. That is pretty much a cause for a lot of differences we are seeing. It doesn't have to care about all the old standards and so that GCC keeps carrying around. It was built on a more modern base, but it also has to catch up on a couple of things GCC has been doing for almost 40 years longer. Another thing that differs between those two compilers is the license. GCC is GPL. Clang is Apache 2.0, which essentially means do whatever you like, except that you wrote it, which has both advantages and drawbacks. I personally prefer the GPL option because it makes people contribute back. But if you're doing something very specific and you just don't want to bother releasing any code, you might opt for the Apache license thing by default. But in terms of the compiler, that really shouldn't be a primary consideration. They are both open, they are both good. Pick whatever works better. Of course, there's a good chance you will need LLVM stuff anyway. It's used by Mesa and other things you will probably want on a system, unless you're building some very specific embedded device. Of course, there's also reasons why you might need GCC anyway. For example, you might want to have the best TDC++ or libGCCS. Whether or not the compiler you are opting for has all the things that you need for the system you are trying to build is another consideration that you should be looking at. One of the pieces of good news is that Clang and GCC are binary compatible. You can link a library built by one compiler to a code built with the other. You can even mix them inside the same project. So you compile one object file with GCC and another with Clang and you link them together and it will work. There's usually not much of a reason to do that. There might be some special cases. For example, if you've observed GCC optimizing one particular function a lot better and Clang optimizing another function a lot better, you might opt for a version where you compile the file that's optimized better with GCC with one compiler and you compile the other file with Clang and then link them together to get the best performance. But usually the performance differences are not big enough for that to matter. If you do want to mix compilers that way you have to use GCC support libraries so libGCC and GIT's version of the CRT object files because Clang can handle GCC's versions but if you want to use Clang's version so if you want to use compiler RT instead of libGCC with GCC it's possible but quite a bit tricky so that's something you probably want to avoid. Another alternative compiler is TinyCC which as the name already tells you is one of the smallest implementations of the full C99 compiler you can get. The compiler source itself is smaller than 4 megabytes compared to multiple hundreds of megabytes for both GCC and Clang and it takes only a few seconds to compile. I managed to compile TinyCC in less than 10 seconds on a relatively fast box but it doesn't optimize as strongly as Clang or GCC and it's also limited to C. It doesn't support any of the other languages supported by the two other compilers so no C++, no Fortran, no whatever else you might want to use but it is certainly another interesting option for small embedded devices and another interesting thing is that you can embed the compiler and essentially make it use C as a scripting language inside your application so even if you don't end up using it as the primary compiler for your project it might be worth a look depending on what you want to do. Another interesting compiler or at least another compiler that might be interesting at some point is OpenARC. So far it's vaporware but it was announced by Huawei last year. It's supposed to become a C, C++ Java, Kotlin and JavaScript compiler that generates native code and they promise it will be fully open at some point but so far they've only released a bit of code that can compile Java to ARC64 assembly and it does that by calling into a binary blob so if you're interested in Open compiler there's not much there yet but if they stick to their promise it could really become an interesting option in the future especially if you have to mix languages but right now it's not there yet so we'll have to see whether or not it goes anywhere. Another option that you will probably have if you're working with embedded devices is using a board support package that comes with the board but usually those board support packages contain a fork of a really outdated version of GCC or Clang and usually both of those compilers have in the meantime already added much better support for the hardware investment and the fork that comes with the board might have so unless you're working on a very special device that is not yet supported by the upstream compilers it's usually the best option to just ignore whatever is in the board support packages maybe pick a couple of libraries also from there but ignore the compilers and just go with the latest version of Clang or GCC sometimes that means you have to add a few kernel patches to make sure whatever outdated kernel comes with the board supports to the current tool chains but those patches are usually already written because they exist in current kernels and they tend to be easy to find so we can just look at the kernel git repository and look at the log for the file that's refusing to compile in general I think it's probably best to avoid any compiler that is not based on GCC or later or on Clang 9 or later earlier versions of those compilers are just not as good so summing it up GCC and Clang are both good options there's no clear winner TinyCC is also interesting to look at depending on what you're doing but just not that great a general purpose compiler both of the big compilers have been used to compile full systems now even including the kernel most clinics distributions that you're using on your desktop or on the server probably have been built with GCC there's a few like OpenMandreva and Android and some of the BSDs that are built mostly with Clang and in some distributions that like to build everything from source you're offered both options so both compilers have had a lot of testing with all the standard open source components so it's really hard to make a choice there Clang makes it a bit easier to add new architectures, new languages generally built as a library so it's easier to embed parts of the compiler in your own code if you want to do that if you're planning to add architectures or a new language in the front end or you want to embed the compiler somewhere chances are you'll be happier with Clang on the other hand if you're using G-Lipsy that currently can't be built with anything but GCC even though there's a couple of patches floating around we'll get back to that a bit later and if you don't need any of the extra other extras offered by Clang you may want to go with GCC for everything as well they're really both good compilers so let's look at the next component which is Lipsy which is basically the core library containing such calls as open, close and everything else that you will end up using in every application out there G-Lipsy is the default option it's what has been around forever it's the most complete Lipsy out there it's the most standard compliant version because it really tries to support all the relevant standards out there including really old ones like C89 it has had a lot of testing because it was for a long time the only option it has the most complete architecture support I'm not going to read off the entire list but if you care just look at the slides or look at the G-Lipsy code but it also has a couple of drawbacks its code is not very readable it can only be compiled with GCC so if you're opting for a different compiler you will have to use GCC for G-Lipsy anyway there is a set of patches that makes it compile with Clang but it's based on an old version of G-Lipsy which is 229 so it might be an interesting project to look at those patches and port them over to current G-Lipsy another drawback of G-Lipsy is that it's not very optimized for small systems it's rather big so roughly 4 megabytes for LDSO, Lipsy, LibM, LibP thread which are the main components you will need anyway of course if you're targeting a high-end desktop or a high-end server 4 megabytes really don't matter so that's not a big deal but if you're targeting an embedded system or a low-end desktop then you really want to save a lot of memory like if you want to get anything to work on my old friend here you probably don't want to use G-Lipsy one alternative that has come up lately is Muzzle which is interesting because it's also very complete it's fast, it's relatively small only 785 kilobytes compared to G-Lipsy's 4 megabytes it was written with C11 and POSIX 2008 compliance in mind instead of also targeting all the older standards but it does support a lot of coming news to G-Lipsy and NXNBSD extensions so most of the code you see out there will compile against Muzzle without problems it also has pretty good architecture support not quite the fullest that G-Lipsy has but pretty much all the interesting architectures are covered in terms of architecture support one really interesting thing in Muzzle is that it's the only Lipsy I've seen that supports open risk I don't know if open risk will ever really go anywhere but it's an interesting architecture and so far if you want to use that architecture you're stuck with Muzzle only another key advantage of Muzzle is that it has readable code so if you want to figure out how your Lipsy works Muzzle is probably the best option to look at G-Lipsy is rather complicated to understand so is your C-Lipsy which is the next option and Muzzle has been around since 2011 so it looks like it's there to stay which is certainly a reason to consider it another option is your C-Lipsy NG which is another relatively complete fast and small Lipsy implementation it's about one megabyte in a full config but the interesting thing in your C-Lipsy is it can be stripped down easily it has a make config target that is just like the kernels config where you get a list of all sorts of optional features optional functions that tend to be quite big you can throw them out easily by just saying this and this and this and I don't want that and then that so if you're building an embedded system and you're not using all the functionality from Lipsy stripping out stuff is acceptable then your C-Lipsy NG might be an interesting project to look at another one is K-Lipsy which was written for early boot up process some distributions must be endeavoured let's use K-Lipsy for their in-it ramfs in early boot up process which is what it was actually written for it's only a subset of Lipsy functions optimized for size over performance it uses kernel structures directly to avoid type conversions so for example the kernel has its own idea of struct stat and most Lipsys have their own idea and when you call stat in a Lipsy there will be some conversion going on whereas in K-Lipsy you just use the kernel struct stat and it gets passed on this type of thing makes K-Lipsy extremely small it's only 75 kilobytes but it's not powerful enough to act as a real work Lipsy it doesn't have all the functions that you will need to compile a full system it might be good enough for some embedded systems one thing to look out there is it uses GPL kernel headers and that results in a kernel license situation that is not completely clear so you might end up putting your entire system under the GPL making it problematic if someone wants to run any non-free applications on top of it which of course if you are trying to push open software heavily might be a good thing but if you are targeting people who might be doing anything that's the reason to avoid it there's another thing much like the OpenARC compiler we've talked about before this is vaporware for now but there's some code there it's the LLVM Lipsy it's in really early stages there's some code you can look at but it doesn't do a lot yet I wouldn't usually have listed this because it's still in early stages but it has some really interesting features like it's designed from the ground up to work with sanitizers and fast testing so you will likely not end up running into all sorts of bugs that have been plaguing other Lipsys for decades it's targeting only C17 and up so you won't have to carry around all the prehistoric craft one design goal of it given that it is just like the Clang compiler a part of LLVM is to use source-based implementations so write everything in the Lipsy in C itself instead of going down to the level of writing assembly that you will find in most other Lipsys and while at it fix the compiler to generate a code that is just as good as the handcrafted assembly code you will find in other Lipsys so if nothing else this Lipsy will help make the compilers better and of course it does come out of a project that has a track record of delivering good options so I'm pretty sure they will get there eventually it's not like it's just some project that is sprung out of nowhere saying okay we are doing this and we will be better than everything else and then it will disappear in a couple of days again there is another option which is Bionic if you've ever looked at Android source code you'll have seen this one it's originally based on the BSD Lipsy it contains some code from free BSD some from open BSD, some from net BSD and some written for Bionic itself it currently only supports the most relevant architectures 32 and 64 bit versions of x86 and ARM it is quite optimized because a lot of vendors put a lot of effort into optimizing Android in the early stages it used to be totally unusable for building a regular Linux system like it didn't have system 5 shared memory which was needed for x11 but it has largely caught up on that and it's by now a fully usable Lipsy but unfortunately at the same time they've added a lot of things to it that are really not existent in stuff outside of Android so there's the APEX stuff which essentially tries to mount any files as directories and look at what's in there which is part of Android's package manager and then there's system properties that last time I checked relied on Android's init implementation to work and the build system is tied to the Android 3 so it is kind of complicated to rip out Bionic and build some non-Android system on top of it but of course doing that gives you a couple of interesting options like using closed drivers that have been written for Android without having to go through hex like the early Piperis and it may be interesting if you're building the Linux Android hybrid system which in some ways makes sense there's one comment in the Q&A which says actually QOS 2.0 can build Bionic so you don't need Android's build system that is really good news I'm definitely going to check that out I must have missed that when it was added and I hope it targets current versions of Bionic that could make things a lot easier so I'll definitely check it out and maybe you talk about that at the next DLC there's a few more options but I'm not going to consider those for full lipsies for a system that's newlyp which is limited to static linking so you might want to look at it if you don't need dynamic linking but pretty much everything except super low and embedded devices will want dynamic linking which pretty much rolls it out and then there's DietLipsy which is another very optimized FOSS-ICE Lipsy but it's not very actively maintained the last release was I think two or three years ago another drawback of this one is that it's GPL licensed which for applications is great but for something as low level as a Lipsy is probably going a bit too extreme because that puts your users into questionable situations if they want to run anything non-free on top of it like trying to build steam or something on top of GPL Lipsy would be problematic so that's probably another one you may want to look at if you have some special needs but it's not as general purpose as the others so what's the best choice to make? again there's no super clear winner if you need maximum compatibility with all the standards if you need binary compatibility with the big distributions out there you pretty much have to go with G-Lipsy if you need something full-fledged but smaller, more memory efficient you probably want to go with muscle if you want to... if all you need is a subset and you can strip out unneeded components if it's clear what you won't be needing G-Lipsy and G-Lipsy might be an interesting choice because that makes stripping out parts easiest and Bionic is obviously interesting if you want to experiment with Android features or if you are looking at a code that has been optimized already by Android guys next up we have C++ support there's a couple of implementations of the standard template library STL which is part of the C++ standard the first option is Lipsy C++ which is part of GCC so that is used by almost all the Linux distributions even the ones that use Clang as their primary compiler the only notable exception is Android and I think the BSDs as well but they are not a Linux distribution so in the context of Linux distribution they don't count and pretty much everything that's being developed in the open world is developed against Lipsy C++ so if you want to avoid tweaking code by adding missing includes or something that happened to be ignored by Lipsy C++ this is what you want to use but there's also Lipsy C++ which is part of LLVM that comes with Clang it's newer and smaller than Lipsy C++ than Lipsy C++ carries less craft that's needed only to support ancient code most benchmarks show it performing better and also show it to be more memory efficient but there's a problem there you can't mix the Lipsy C++ and Lipsy C++ because they export the same symbols but they are not fully binary compatible so you get into an interesting situation when you have for example Qt built against Lipsy C++ then you grab a binary that was built on some other distribution with Qt that was built against Lipsy C++ then that binary wants to call into functions from both STL implementations that's not going to work, that's just going to crash so if you expect running into a situation where your user will end up running third-party binaries built against something else that's the main reason why you don't want to use Lipsy C++ that's why we aren't using it in OpenMount Reaver even though we'd like to one interesting thing is that third-party applications like Chromium increasingly just embed their own copy of Lipsy C++ obviously they can do it because they don't expect anything else to link against their binaries so they make sure that anything that is linked against it is not linked against any system library that would be using a different STL so if you want to go their way of essentially including an entire distribution in your binary Lipsy C++ is certainly also a really good option for the sake of completeness there's UC Lipsy C++ which was an attempt to write an STL implementation to go along with UC Lipsy an interesting feature there is that you can strip out some parts of the STL but the last commit to it was in 2016 so there's a good chance you don't want to use this anymore we have some more questions one is can we use G Lipsy or Muscle with Clang the answer for Muscle is yes it works with either compiler you can probably even build it with TinyCC if you feel like it, I haven't tried it but I don't see why it wouldn't work and for G Lipsy the answer is not at the moment but there's a couple of patches for an older version that make it sort of work so if someone wants to port those patches to account G Lipsy that would make it possible and that would definitely be interesting for the future and I'll probably try to do that at some point but right now I just don't have the time the other one is how Muscle provides better memory efficient Lipsy which I guess is why is Muscle smaller than G Lipsy essentially it's mostly by leaving out the support for older obsolete standards and by having smaller implementations of some of the functions I hope that answers all the questions so far let's go on to the next thing conclusions for C++ support is essentially if binary compatibility with other Linux distributions is a big concern you really want to go with libstdc++ because that's whatever one is using but if you're using Clang and you care about performance and memory efficiency more than compatibility libc++ is something you clearly want to look at okay lastly we want to take a look at what the right thing to do is in a distribution given there's no clear best option for everything a distribution should try to support developers for all options I'm going to talk about some things we've already done in OpenMintRiva and that you can be doing in your favorite distribution as well and a few things that we are planning to do in the next couple of versions that would also be good to be adopted a bit more widely one thing you want to do is keep your cross-compilers up to date with Clang that is something that happens automatically because the cross-compilers are all in the same binary anyway but with GCC you often end up packaging one cross-compiler and then leaving it there, it works, it works and you update the system GCC you update the system GCC again and the cross-compiler remains that the old version is just not the way it should be done so the best way to do it is to build the cross-compilers if you are packaging any from the same source as the main version of GCC that can be done quite easily we figured out how to do it in the OpenMintRiva packages if you want to see how we've done it I've put a link to the package source in the slides this is using RPM but obviously you can do the same thing with other package managers and essentially the idea is simply using a for loop that builds all the cross-compilers at the same time from the same source with the same patches so you will always keep your tool chains in sync next up is file system changes we used to have the situation where there's just user-lib and then some distributions added user-lib 64 some added user-lib 32 to make sure that 64-bit and 32-bit binaries can coexist but that's really no longer sufficient there's multiple ABIs so for example on ARM you have 164-bit ABI but there's multiple 32-bit like you have EABI versus the old ABI you have Neon versus Non-Neon and you might need to have more than two of those on one system of course QEMU BinFMT is coming along really nicely making it possible to run code for different CPUs without the user even noticing it so if only you had all the libraries in the right place you could run x86 windows applications and vine on an ARM box I wouldn't even have to notice so some distributions most of the Debian derivatives have already opted for a solution there they are now creating user-lib triplet so you have for example user-lib x86 Linux GNU and user-lib AX64 Linux GNU which is a step in the right direction but I think there's a way to do it even better which is going for user-triplet-lib instead of user-lib triplet because this allows combining the real file system you have for the cross compiler sysroot so essentially your user AX64 Linux GNU is at the same time the sysroot for your AX64 cross compiler and the place for libraries that will be picked up by QEMU if you try to run an ARM64 binary you can also put includes that are not architecture independent for example headers that hard-code 32 bit or 64 bit references include directory that belongs there and you can overwrite binaries for a couple of places where it's necessary to have different binaries thankfully that's only needed for a few libraries so for example some older libraries don't use PKG config or so to find stuff but they have some whatever library dash config binary that gets all the information and you don't typically want to use the 64 bit version to compile a 32 bit binary or vice versa and this type of file system change also makes it possible to keep all the compatibility with older systems you want because you can just create a same link that links the triplet slash lib directory that you created in this change to the traditional directory name whether that was lib or lib32 or lib64 so that's pretty much what I had to say about toolchain options I'm still going to take questions, feedback and obviously if you have any spare specs of cache so now is a good time to ask or you can email me or find me on the Slack channels in the conference okay it doesn't look like we are getting more questions oh it does something let me see okay there's actually some questions coming in I just didn't spot them because the window was scrolled out so one was what does STL mean it's the standard template library that's just the C++ standard library so standard template library, libstdc++ libc++ all the same so another question was can glibc be built leaving out older legacy functionality not by itself but obviously if you're comfortable tweaking make files editing stuff you can adjust it, the code is open so if you want to do it certainly you can next question, what do you think about function multi-versioning for support of multiple arcs and one binary is this a possible solution that could minimize OS file system size I haven't actually seen an option that would allow multi-versioning for completely different architectures like that would allow a 64-bit ARM and a 32-bit x86 version of the same function in the same library I might be wrong about this I've certainly never seen it but the drawback of that obviously is that it makes it hard to strip out stuff you don't need so for example if you're building the distribution for an ARM system and you want wine to run so you need x86, 32 and 64 there's no way the user could just decide I don't want to use wine anyway so let me just strip out all the x86 crap from the library so for this particular thing I don't think that's really much of an option obviously it is interesting for stuff where you're targeting for example Intel x86 and AMD x86 with slightly different options most of the functions can actually be the same and you just want specific functions optimized for one particular processor okay I think that's all of it there's a couple more so-called questions saying thank you well of course I'm returning that thank you all too and I keep checking for messages for a bit okay unless I've missed anything you've got all the questions covered so thanks for attending and oh wait, the new question just came in which is is Clang supporting new instructions for ARM x86 the answer to that is yes it generally adds support for them quite quickly occasionally ahead of gcc mostly a little bit behind gcc but usually the support is in quite quickly you can use stuff like dashmrg equals send version 2 or dashmrg equals Skylake or whatever okay another one is any idea of my build route doesn't support clang yet unfortunately no I have no idea probably because the maintainer doesn't like it or likes gcc better but I'm pretty sure if someone wants to they would take a patch and there's another one, any word on debuggers essentially we have gdb which has been the default for a long time we also have lldb which is the version that comes with llvm essentially that is getting there as well, I haven't used it a lot yet but it looks promising as well so those two are certainly things to keep in mind and I'm not aware of any options that are not based on either of those but there might be any I just haven't had much of a need to go looking for anything else because gdb and lldb do okay I think I've caught up so let's check for a second longer if there's new questions coming in but I think we are done what would you say is the more stable variant of libc for embedded use that's a good question, they are all pretty good so embedded use obviously can mean anything from a Cortex-M to a relatively high end device like a modern smartphone it really makes sense to look at the exact things you need gdb is obviously the option that has been used on everything for a long time so that is a good default but if you need to save more space it's probably more interesting possibly also you see libc if you want to strip out parts but if you're looking for a full-fledged one I'd go with muscle if you're building a phone then maybe bionic is also an interesting option because thanks to android that has had a lot of testing in that context okay let's see the new stuff is coming in right now so I think we are done oh wait, there's another one it's a comment saying muscle is a nice option because of its MIT license you can build static binaries without the constraints of the lgpl license yeah that's true, obviously being an open source guy I think that regardless of what the license forces you to do you should be releasing your code but if for some reason you can't do that obviously the MIT license is another reason to go with muscle okay so we've had a couple of questions some feedback, no backs of cash yet so you still might want to send those nothing coming in just thanks, well thanks for you too okay and then I guess we are done and hope to see you at the next ELC whether it's virtual or real and have a nice rest of the day and if you have anything else feel free to contact me by email or find me on the Slack channel which would be two track Linux systems


What's up everybody? Jason here for Jazby's casebricks.com 2021 Panini Hoops basketball hobby five box break random teams number three just sold out and again guys 30 total spots everybody. It's a random team in the NBA. Remember all inserts rookies parallels numbered cards will all ship Just remember no veteran coming ship unless it's Luca LeBron Yana Zion and jaw. All right guys So here's the dice roller. Here's a customer name some mojo down to Croft. You got Hawks down in the Wizards Roll the dice Three and a five eight times. Good luck. What? two three four five six seven and eight eight times Michael down to Thomas eight times here one two three four five six seven eight times 76ers down at the Detroit Pistons All right, so Michael you have the 76ers opera with the Pacers Michael the Clippers John with the nuggets Michael the pelicans heat Eddie with the Celtics Michael with the Spurs Brian with the Bulls Michael the Bucks Eddie with the Hornets mojo with the Lakers Eddie with the Kings Michael with the Sons of Grizzlies Chow with the Tewels Sean with the Cavs Michael the Hawks Thomas of the Warriors Michael the Knicks thunder Brian with the Nets Michael the Mavericks Brian with the Rockets Michael with the Raptors Ramon with the Wizards Aubrey with the Jazz Michael the Blazers Sean with the magic and Thomas with the Pistons So again quick trade window if you guys want to trade not stick with what you got I Think we'll have more Tyler, but we sold out of two cases already. Yes on personals. Alrighty guys Well, we'll have more of this probably up on the website to Tyler. That's what you're asking I'm sure we have more and when it's new release date Tyler, you know how it is people want all the new stuff And we also posted up some new stuff today, too Besides hoops First box guys. Good luck hypnotized koala entered Tyrese Halliburton And we got Emanuel quickly to 199 tj4 Hoops Inc And we got Thomas Bryant 14 out of 99 we got next Thaddee Bay Hive Alters Trey Young Patrick Beverly Normans gonna Anthony Edwards Cassius Stanley Legends of the game Adrian Gantley Lamello Bill Russell tribute RJ Um, yeah, I think it did already. It'll be after this Kira Lewis jr. For the pelicans Little ding right there, but James Weisman Spaniak All right guys, here you go too as well Next box The backs ever happen in a hockey? Uh, same base No, no, just like yeah, yeah like Tuesday Wednesday. Oh, yeah. Yeah, they're gonna actually I think this year They're gonna do sometime three. So yeah, two days. Yeah, back to back. Definitely Yeah, I'm sure it is It's like soccer they don't do back to back because it Well, yeah, they they don't even play like within three days, right? Yeah, usually. Yeah, jimmy butler It's usually at least three and that's and that's considered like the metal ball dangerously short.  Yeah, the soccer field is much bigger Brandon Clark Tyrese Halliburne Is that right Daniel? Is that how they got, um Is that how they tested positive a couple of players already? Zion backstage pass Payne Pritchard Jeremy land Luca high vault is nice. I'm sure this is gonna sell pretty well. Dallas Mavericks going to Michael Laniakka And Terry Cummings for the Seattle Super Sonics I gotta go to okay. See you going to Michael. We got Romeo Langford a 25 Julia's Irving Absolutely And Alakai Ricky ink for the Toronto Raptors Michael with that one Precious Lebron legends of the game You Three one of school, right?  So the cardboard particles all the dust nice primetime Donovan Mitchell Anthony Edwards Tyrese maxi all righty next one I A lot of time left Jason a lot of time left. Yeah, we got like 40 minutes left. Yeah Soccer is wild I would feel a lot more comfortable It's that goal in minutes 10 minutes. Um Is this still regular season regular season? Yeah, that chinking champions. They start back up in a couple of weeks There's that Trent Alexander Ari is 66 A little bit of a quieter season this year. There you go Trent Do they have fans in the stadium or that just noise just noise? Oh That's a good ball by Trent hypnotized Jason Tatum James Weisman rookie. Oh just missed that header How's the hoops looking? It's good Changes a little bit of the, you know, like the high voltage looks it's a little different, but the parts look, you know, pretty much the same Onyeka We got next Devin Vaso Precious Are we just pretty much leaving every rookie? Oh purple Lamello Um for the mall the bigger names that I know of I'm just putting the rookies to the side and then Maybe we come and put a list or something. Yeah, good idea. Yeah, at least I'm just splitting them up for the first day Yeah, a little purple Lamello. It's probably gonna sell pretty well Um that is gonna go to uh Hornets Eddie there you go man That's a little Lamello right there Rebounds more than I thought he would Yeah Porzingis. Yeah, these cards are really tough to see but they're like numbered spark plugs Payne Pritchard and Skyler Mays rookie ink ATL Atlanta Draw screen RJ Hampton Lebron backstage coral Calm alone tribute Utah Jazz Tyrese Maxie Obi We got Dwight Poil number 299 draw screen Oh Joe don't look Call Anthony John Collins Anthony Edwards Seacum high voltage Obi and Patrick Williams two rook inks and this rocks Bulls run a Brian Croft And there's a Lamello right here Grand Hill Halliburton All right two more boxes guys remember after this Joe take over he'll go through orders and then he will break open number four Last five boxes of the case Why That'll probably break after hoops number four, but yeah, man, that'll break with Joe I Voltage Nice Pulled a luke a high voltage in this break and now jammer and That is very nice Memphis Grizzlies as when a Michael I pulled a purple Lamello on this side right now Then a couple inserts, but that purple Pretty strong Yeah, Lamello now playing Ooh James Wiseman. There you go Hot signature rookies Warriors going to Thomas There you go There's James Wiseman again right there Future legends of the game. Look at Donchich Call Anthony There you go Tom. Congrats, man Scotty legends of the ball And Langston Gallo little port side pelicans Zion Zion city edition Ovi Maxi Denny I Hypnotized Nicola Jokic James Wiseman Anthony Edwards Ice Grant Riller I Lamello Zeon Yannis tributes Haliburton I Boke down All righty guys last box last box Ray what's going on happy ones in there All right guys last box good luck Laber Obi Call Anthony And we got Desmond Bain Tyler hero future legends of the game Anthony Edwards And we got high voltage Anthony Davis very nice Anthony Edwards NBA hoops magazine And rams it looking for the kings Eddie with that one Luga Donchich prime time Uh, well Kenny, you have to fill up some fillers first if you guys want to break that I know it may say sold out, but I believe you have to fill up Opulence pack filler number 750 with 22 spots left and I think one more after that So right next to the opulence break it says five opulence giveaway spots Tim Hardaway Jr. No problem, man James Wiseman And we got hypnotized Russell Westbrook.  I feel like we got more Lamello's in this box One two three four five Of course you got the purple Lamello And here's your autographs and high voltage ones Wiseman Otto was nice high voltage John Morant Patrick Williams Schuyler Mays Malakai Flynn Terry Cummings Kyrillus Jr High voltage Luka Donchich TJ Ford Langston Galloway Ramsey and Stefan Marbury So there you go guys that was number three number fours coming up next with joe jaspyscasebricks.com


Hey folks, we're here at the 2017 NCHA Lucas Oil Superstakes with the winner of the unlimited amateur five and six year old final, Jimmy Barris, who rode two time dual and marked a 220. Congratulations to you Jimmy. Thank you very much. How does it feel to win your first major title here? Past awesome. It's been a lot of fun. Of course I can't give much enough credit to my trainer Grant Setnicka. He found this horse when he was a rain cow horse and was having problems with he changed leads on himself and stuff and he called me up because I told Grant I said, man, I don't I don't want any more amateur horses or any more non pro horses.  So he called me, show me this little video of him. And he said, I'll never forget it. He says, horse is special. And so he brought him home. I went over there about three, four weeks later. So I bought him on the spot. He said, now I know how impatient you are. So you got to be patient with him. And I was and he I know there's good trainers here. But there's nobody as good as Grant Setnicka in my book. He did miracles with this horse. I mean, he had the natural ability and stuff that you can't teach. But man, I'm home. He turned him into a winning horse for you. Did you have instant chemistry with the horse? I did. I we got him, like I said, he said, we need to be patient. So we got him bottom in November, December of 15. I think he showed him in a couple of weekend shows. And then I wrote him one time a week before the Superstakes last year and made the finals on him. So it was pretty good. And then showed him at some other shows. And then Grant made the finals on him in the open in the Derby. Last year he was sixth and first or second Gail, you know, I remember, but he was he was up there. He won right at 58 almost 59,000 last year, but he didn't start cutting till he was till April. And so he's just funny. He's little. He's probably not 1313 to gutsy cocky. I love him. So he showed all that today. Take us through your run. He's well.  We cut all the all the cows we cut we wanted. And I was last in the bunch. It was pretty tough. But got him cut clean. He's thrown dirt out of the arena. Got the second one cut clean and the third one.  And I ended up cutting the gray cow and none of the black cows, but I worked out fine. It all worked out good. So I was tickled to death. I mean, I'm not going to make a living doing this, but this was probably one of the most fun things I've ever done. Well, speaking of that, you've won $23,000 today. Almost almost doubling lifetime earnings. So I mean, you've got to be happy with that. I am happy. I'm very happy. And then I show and I made the finals on him tomorrow in the 50 amateur. And my plan is to win it to and Grant's gone like, weren't you satisfied with that? What wise words did he give you when, you know, as coaching what sticks with you? Grant's good because, you know, and Grant and I met he he understood at the beginning I was I'm very competitive. And I want him to coach me like a coach used to coach me. I want to be hard on me. You know, if I mark a 220 my first deal is when I go out there is like, what could I have done to mark a 222? Could I have done something to make it better?  I've been cutting good, luckily, and just be smooth. You got it done. Good luck with the next final. Thank you. Thank you for joining it. Appreciate it.


Hello everybody welcome back to another Adobe Premiere Pro 2021 tutorial and this one I'm going to show you in one click how to load Premiere Pro and get rid of all of your previous preferences and settings. All you need to do is this is on a Mac on a PC it's a little different but on a Mac you just want to hold down the option key and left click on the Premiere Pro in your dock if you're on a PC you're going to hold down the alt key and open up the program file so in this case hold down the alt or the option key click on it I'm going to do that right now and make sure you don't let go of the alt or option key when you load and in a second here you're going to see it start to load and then it's going to ask me if I want to reset my preferences I do not so I'm going to cancel out of that but there you saw it happen also I want to show you if you hold down the alt or the option key and the shift key and you do that I'm going to close it actually let's force quit it there we go I'm closing it alt key or option key and the shift key and open it it does the same thing however in this situation it will also ask you to it will also delete your cache and your media files and things like that so I want you to keep that in the back of your head those are the two options I hope this tutorial helped you out I got a ton more stuff coming up stay tuned be back soon


Hey below buddies. Thanks for watching. All right in this video We are gonna talk about Build-A-Bear and we've talked about it before but I did a little research And I found some new ones that we need to be on the lookout for so I'm gonna share them with you some Build-A-Bear Go for big money other Just bread and butter some of them sit forever, but some of them go for crazy money So what you need to do is know what to look for so I'm gonna show you some of the big money Bolo Build-A-Bear items The first item here is this extremely rare Calico cat Never seen this one. I don't think I don't think I've ever had this in a past video And it still has the original tags this sold for $250 and the buyer paid shipping Confirmed feedback good sale look for the Calico cat now did it sell for more because it has tags maybe But still a great Great Bolo the Paul Patrol It seems like people really want these Paul Patrol Build-A-Bear. All right Bolo buddies I have a whole tote of Build-A-Bear Build-A-Bear Build-A-Bear Build-A-Bear Tons and tons of Build-A-Bear clothing and accessories Just tons and tons of it. I am having a show on what not on Is that Harley Davidson? Oh my goodness, and I think this is frozen. Anyway sidetracked. Is this the Cleveland Browns? I have no idea what's in here, but I am having a show Thursday the 12th at 2010 28 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on what not I hope you will come and see me We're gonna be selling this Build-A-Bear stuff Build-A-Bear clothes and Let's get into this video where I talked to you about big money Bolo's that are Build-A-Bear now. I'm not saying anything in here is a big money Bolo I'm just saying I'm having a Build-A-Bear show and I'm gonna lead into this category video on Build-A-Bear clothing and Big money Build-A-Bears to look for so let's get started $295 for this guy now he does have on the clothing. I think that makes him more valuable For sure. So if you can find the clothes and put them on the bear, that's definitely good This is Rocky. He sold for 295 plus shipping and that was also a good sale What I like to do is show you guys feedback when the item sells to let you know that it actually was a legit sale And that the buyer did get paid This is a Build-A-Bear springbok and I've talked about this one in a past video and I don't know what it's a springbok I was gonna say I don't know what kind of animal it is, but it's a springbok That's what it is a stuffed animal plush would have been good for the title, but it looks like it didn't matter sold for $300 The next item is the Build-A-Bear pumpkin and everybody Probably knows about this one. I've talked about it quite a bit. Now. This one does say 2023 limited edition vault collection Mask eyes. I don't know what that means Oh, okay, so they're circling. Oh, that's a defect maybe misprint Sad pumpkin, okay Oh my goodness, who would even notice that that's hilarious, but they're not wrong they are not wrong It's sold for four hundred dollars, but this one in general With the pumpkins on it is a bolo. So be on the lookout if you if you see this guy There's a cat and then there's also a bear the cat goes for more than the bear. That's so funny I don't know what the mask eyes means This one, uh, also sold for uh 400 feedback left This is build-a-bear grumpy care bear. It sold for $399 the buyer paid shipping And it was new with tags and also a good sale This one is unstuffed. All right, so pretty much hello kitty if you can find a hello kitty build-a-bear Pick it up. It may not be big money, but you're gonna sell it. They sell pretty good I have sold quite a few in the past But this one is unstuffed and it sold for five hundred and ten dollars It retailed for 22 guys 22 From 2010 with the original tags sold for five hundred and ten dollars And feedback was left The next item is the build-a-bear jag wire. These are from the st. Louis zoo. Somebody told me that that zoo closed I don't know if that's accurate or not. I didn't look it up, but I'm pretty sure somebody left that in the comments So these do go for more. They are really collectible This one's from 2008 and it sold for 500 and the buyer paid shipping and Feedback was left Here's another hello kitty. This is a watercolor build-a-bear sold for five 65 on auction with the clothes. I'm sure that helped and it feedback positive feedback Here is a build-a-bear's hearts for your pup jumbo size Unstuffed and they put a water bottle next to it to show scale. I think I usually use a tape measure I think that you really, you know shows it better, but it didn't matter It sold for six hundred and fifty dollars and the buyer paid shipping and feedback was left This is the build-a-bear puppy pink patchwork plush. Oh my goodness. Check it out six hundred and eighty nine dollars for this little cutie and feedback was left This is a build-a-bear jumbo root off sold for seven 75 and I don't know how big it oh It is jumbo. Oh, it is a biggin. Whoo. Look how big it is. It's for display only not a toy Uh feedback was left on that one as well Here is another hello kitty sparkle. Hello kitty bear $3,050. Are you kidding me right now? Can this be real? 2010 wow And it does have the outfit Wow It's real guys. It's real. Here's the feedback check it out and this buyer was so happy $3,000 happy Okay, so another thing to look for are the clothing items, especially the hello kitty the hello kitty seemed to be a hit 44.98 for these two outfits This one sold for 49.50. It's scooby-doo And there's the feedback This is a build-a-bear zuma hat. So this is one of the The paul patrol pups $50 Build-a-bear disney winnie the pooh eor 59.99 plus shipping. Here's your feedback This is a build-a-bear kimono girl costume japanese $79 feedback left This is build-a-bear backpack clear with flowers and one sleeping bag $74 There's your feedback A taxi cab car for a build-a-bear. How cute is that like a costume or actually it's probably just their car $75 feedback left Build-a-bear underwear 87 97 days of the week. It looks like is that what that says? Oh, yeah days of the week. That's so funny feedback left The next item are these build-a-bear san rio Skechers how cute are those 125 dollars now? I did see different price ranges on these. These look to be new Um, I think if they're pre-owned scuffed up they might not go for as much maybe only 50 But they're still a bolo. So be on the lookout feedback left The next item is a build-a-bear bow lot. So you're going to get all of these bows. These get lost all the time So definitely be on the lookout Um, this is custom listing Uh, I think these are actually build-a-bear brand I don't think somebody made these. I think these are build-a-bear brand sold for 137 plus shipping feedback left Here is a hello kitty set. It looks like it's all hello kitty $250 19 pieces Feedback left the next one with the original tags my melody outfit by Hello Kitty 325 dollars with one bid um, no feedback on this one, but you can go in and look and It looks like they did a buy it now of 325. So I think buy it now. They probably auto paid for that And yeah, looks like they started the price at 250 and took a buy it now of 325 on that Another place to find build-a-bear is um, here's that build-a-bear the That's the black bear build-a-bear Didn't I have this one over here? Let me see Okay, they're calling this a jag black bear Oh jagger Jagger jag wire. I don't know. It's a black bear, but it sold for 500 on ebay. All right This bear sold for 500 on ebay This bear sold for 855 on mercari and it sold on 8 24 of 23 So one thing that I tell you guys all the time is Sometimes items sell for more on mercari make sure that you are getting your plush on mercari crosspost those items I use list perfectly I start on ebay and then I cross post to the other platforms But if you use the catalog you can remove your items much easier. I'm manually removing I have a video down below that tells you all about it. Definitely check it out You can get 30 off of list perfectly with coupon referral code volo buddies all one word But check out that demo video and see if it's something that you're interested in 500 on ebay 855 on mercari mercari link down below if you want to join mercari with my referral link You will get $10 to shop and another $20 when you sell a hundred dollars worth of stuff So definitely definitely definitely get on mercari. I know a lot of you already have Thank you for using my referral link. I appreciate that very much That gives me money to shop on mercari as well This is a hard to find What is this thing? Choke choco cat by san rio. So it's another san rio san rio does really good $700 on that one Here's another uh bear And i'm looking over here at the pictures. You got your tags. You got the patch on the eye 638 on this one. We had this one over here on ebay also Hearts fur pup is that it? No Let me find it. I want to see I want to see I want to see I know that we did this one There it is 689 on ebay and 638 on Mercari so pretty close on that one about the same price but a little more on ebay This one is a sheba And look at it. It's so cute 607 this one. I don't think I've ever talked about this one either So realistic looking animals Very very cool 607 dollars. This is the bill to bear gray mustang $600 and you can see he's got a little bit of wear to him and still sold for 600 The next item is another choco cat or choco cat $5.95 on this one and he's got his little shirt on Build a bear candy corn $550 for this one guys big money big money bill to bear bolo's This one is the limited edition disney downtown dog And it says it right here custom made downtown disney And that one sold for 550 Here is the bill to bear coropee unstuffed with tags 425 look for this frog It's a bolo And bill to bear pokemon. I would say look up all pokemon 475 on this one any stuffed animal Here is a blue eyed baby panther bill to bear $430 on this one super super cute And bill to bear st. louis zoo another st. louis zoo. This one is an otter It is an otter 375 on that one with the original tags Bill to bear stripes a lot bunny $350 on this little cutie pie Look how cute And the next one here is another downtown disney This one sold for 379. It's got the ipad. You'll see it But look it looks like it's got some dirt up on its head and it still sold for 379 dollars The next item is this bill to bear eagle $340 for the eagle you guys seriously Crazy look every bill to bear up some of them are bread and butter some of them are big money This is lamb chop from i think doc mcstuffins $350 on her And the next one And final one is the bill to bear ghost and these do range and price Some of these go for more 305 on this one and it actually has two bill to bear the mama and the baby I don't know if it's the mama and the baby, but I mean are their mama and baby ghosts It sure looks like it 305 on that one. Oh my goodness bill to bear bill to bear bill to bear. It's crazy Get those plush on mercari you guys get them on mercari Cross post definitely a believer in cross posting for sure. Um, I'm on mercari poshmark And uh ebay ebay is my main platform But there are other platforms. There's like depop Grailed what are the other ones there's like 10 or 11 platforms you can cross post to From or with list perfectly a lot of people go into the catalog They list directly into the catalog and then cross post to a whole bunch of platforms I personally don't have time for more than mercari and poshmark because I'm doing what not I'm doing a video a day here and it's just too much but for those of you that are only selling on platforms Get those items cross posted and list perfectly. I've been using it since 2019 Bolo buddies all one word 30 off your first month. Check out that demo video down below I know they're having some upgrades right now Some new things that are starting and coming out. So if you upgrade use bolo buddies code again And sometimes it will work with the upgrade as well. All right. Thank you guys so much for being here Thank you for watching. Be sure to like comment subscribe and share and I will see you at the next one. Thanks for watching