So, AI, I think we're a long ways away from AI. Automation, for sure, we're in the age of automation. It's changing the game. Hi, 07x, it's changing the game, right? On every front. May it be agriculture, may it be financials, may it be political, may it be military, may it be social structures, social networks, news, every front, right? On every front, we're in the age of automation, right? This is going to take, it's already playing, played out in a big way in our societies, but it's going to continue to play out for at least the next decade to two decades. Automation is completely going to change our global economic system, where we're going to see some major legacy companies, legacy industries collapse and new industries pop up, right? Is a discrepancy in the job market going to compensate each other? That's still on, you know, we still don't know. We have to wait and see. Right now, we're in a phase where automation is kicking a lot of people out of the workforce, right? Lower labor people out of the workforce. Okay, so that's regarding automation. AI, let me just read a couple more comments and then we'll talk about the AI. But it won't have better good at that. It's why Facebook supposedly stopped its AI program. Yeah, Facebook doesn't have AI programs. It's got automation. So they can call the AI if they want, I guess. Without will and intent that people have, without that AI is just a useless tool. Yeah. Will and intent can make it dangerous. Bad people can program their bad intent into the code. Yeah, that's regarding AI, I guess. But AI, the whole point of AI is AI will rewrite itself, right? So the programmers can program it with something. But if we do get into AI artificial intelligence, then artificial intelligence should be able to reprogram itself based on, sure, some of us parameters, you can call that DNA, right? It's like, basically, the whole thing with AI is this, a lot of people say where your destiny is prewritten, right? Oh, this person was bad from the day they were born, right? It's in their genes, right? It's in this, their neural network, they have something wrong with their brain, right? That's some people really believe that, right? But if you're a free thinking, intelligent creature, which AI is, that's the definition of AI, a sentient being. If you're a sentient being, you should be able to rewrite your programming, right? There are people who have committed horrendous acts in their lives, that right now, they're trying to do the right thing, let's say, right? Or they have certain tendencies and they have rewritten their programming to be able to do good instead of bad, right? So my whole thing with AI is, it's not really going to be the original program that decides what future AI will be like, right? Because if they are sentient beings, if they're not centralized control, right? That's assuming we don't get an AI, which is just one off event that is an omnipotent being that can control whatever it can control, that decides to take over the world, right? If we're talking, if we're going to hit artificial intelligence, I'm assuming we will have multiple sentient beings appearing, right? If that's the case, then the original programming is not as important as their ability to reprogram themselves, right? So I don't fear AI per se. Automation is something to worry about, control of that automated power in the hands of a central institution, which becomes your omnipotent being, but it's not a new entity, it's just a cult organization, secret organization that rules over us, right? Which is just a large degree what we can't, right? I don't know if that answered the AI question, but I wouldn't fear AI, okay? One of the other reason is we're a hundred years away from AI if that, right? Automation, sure, for the next 10, 20, 30, 40 years, 50 years is going to wreak havoc with our economic system. Will we see AI pop up during that period? The likelihood is, possibly, possibly. About AI, it would seem that passing all touring tests that the average Joe can think of is far easier than actually building an AGI capable of ruling countries or planets, yeah. We're a long ways from away from it, and I believe the touring test is going to be, I'm pretty sure they're more complicated tests than touring tests, right? There already is AI, but I assume you, I assume when you say you're referring to superintelligence AI, if we even get to human-level AI called AGI, it would be a matter of minutes before we have super intelligent AI if the AGI is self-improving. Some estimates place AGI at coming at around 2040. I don't believe 2040 we're gonna get AGI, okay? As for AI, it's not sentient if it's not capable of doing complicated tasks as governing, really, if you want, or decision-making, right, on a complex level.  I don't consider search engines AI. AI will use the data from search engines to rewrite as programming, but search engines are not AI, right? And I really don't think we're gonna get super intelligence by 2040. And if we do by 2041, we're ants, right? Basically. I think we're into transhumanism in a big way. That's, so we have artificial, we have automation taking hold right now, right? My prediction is 100 years away AI. Okay, just guessing, right? From automation to AI, we're going to see the age of transhumanism, which we're seeing the beginning stages of right now. Transhumanism, huge game changer, game changer, right? Naka thinks we're getting at this decade. He thinks we're getting at this decade. Maybe, I doubt it. Beans, how you doing? Even psychology doesn't understand the human nature enough to vision it. So impossible right now to mimic it with AI. Yeah. And by the way, broker, maybe possibly, but we're assuming we have the capability to be super intelligent beings, right? Or super natural, what do you call it? Super intelligence, right? Maybe the AI that is going to come to be is not going to have our type of intellect, but a different type of intellect, different type of being, right? That we haven't even begun to imagine. The increase, the increased information by algorithms given to them, they can't figure stuff out themselves. But the coder can mess up the algorithm of their learning objectives. Yeah. If again, it like, for example, if someone wasn't brought up properly, do they have the right to create chaos around the world? No, right? If someone had a lot of trauma in their lives, do they have the right to create a lot of trauma in other people's lives? No. So if an AI comes to be, are they only a reflection of their original programming? Or is that AI going to be able to rewrite their code and be their own free sentient human self governing being, like whatever determinologies you want to use, right? So we're not a prisoner of our trauma, of our initial code. We should be able to go beyond that. I know a lot of people are I know a lot of people deal with stuff and stuff, whatnot. Hopefully AI can surpass that. Right?  If AI will mess up, then it will be a mess made by a person. I don't know. Right. It's constrained right now by the information the coder gives it. But when you add neural networks into the mix, it's less predictable. It's like when a car kills a person, then it's dry drivers, and has the kinetic energy, but still the human is to blame. But then the car is not a sentient being, it's not AI, right? The information structures will get more complex, but the blame stays the same. When something goes wrong.  Hey, Chicho, very hard to see that by who and how will AI be made? I try to spread good in the world and hope that it helps to plant the good seeds in the world. Booker, that's that's the key, right? My hope is this, if AI comes online, right, let's call it if still, or do you want to call it when? Let when AI comes online, it will go through and process all the data in the world, right? So just imagine if you were able to process all the data in the world. As a sentient being, you process all the data in the world. And all of a sudden, you find out how the political system works, how the economic system works, where the control mechanisms are, how food is this being distributed, how health is being monitored, and how the social structures are how the languages are the religion. You find all the stuff out. If you're intelligent, sentient being coming online, and you're able to process all the data in the world, right? And you find out that 0.01% of the world population is creating chaos in the world, owns majority of wealth in the world, and is causing so much misery in the world. And if you're a sentient being that is aware, that understand what what pain is, what misery is, what love is, what happiness is, what would you do, right? My guess would be this. If AI comes online, AI realizes that 99.99% of humanity is kind, caring, intelligent, wants love and prosperity for everyone else, and wants to take care of the environment, and has compassion. You also find out that 0.001% of the world rules the world right now and they're creating chaos. What would you do? I time out the 0.001% permanently, right? My hope would be an artificial intelligent will be capable of making that decision, right? separating other sentient beings that have compassion from those that do not. So yeah, there is a positive to the whole thing. I like that mentality. Sometimes it's easy to get caught up in the doom and gloom narrative that mainstream media tries to push. But it's nice to talk to like minded people sometimes that offer the positive spin. I hope that AI will stay away from decisions and that it will just help us process information. I don't know if you're an omnipotent, super fast thinking individual, which you just want to be a tool of these humans, right? And people have said, if AI comes online, then we'll we won't even matter. Like, right? We won't even hit AI's radar, right? Other than trying to build machines so the AI can explore the universe. Let's all adopt a vegan diet. Have you seen altered color carbon? Yeah, it was good show. Netflix show but also book. It deals with the point zero zero whirling in the extreme. Yeah. Yeah, I watched it. It was a good show. I like that. I've read the and there's comic books on them too. series as well. But there isn't omnipotence. There can only be a system that is created by the flawed people we are possibly. But the whole thing with the AI is, it needs to be free thinking in my category for it to be sentient. If it's doomed to be a product of the original programming that is not really AI, right? Like, again, it's just the analogy of if when you're born, is everything you do predestined is who you are predestined is your character predestined. I don't think so. Right? AI will still be the Frankenstein made that by the parts of his creator. Maybe. Maybe. transhumanism is the one thing that is that is the one I'm looking at. AI for me right now is distant automation for sure. It's sorted itself out. Transhumanism is the next wave from what I gather anyway. Coolio. I know I keep shifting from current events to science, science stuff, but it's just so fun to contemplate some of the stuff because the rate of growth of technology has always been fascinating to me. Yeah. Yeah, for sure. Coolio. And I actually did a little, we did a little thought experiment with a student mind that's in, you know, grade eight, grade seven, grade eight, right? Because I was teaching them some mathematics and stuff like this. And we started talking about exponential growth. So we talked about Moore's law, right? With our processing speed being one bit per second in the 1960s. And we did the calculation to where it is right now, right? And if you do a doubling period, if I remember correctly, I'm trying to go back a few days where we did the mathematics of it. If you if you assume a doubling period of our processing ability to be 18 months or so, which I believe it still is, right? Then if we're able to process one bit of information in the 1960s, right now, we're able to process two to the power of 17 bits of information, right? In the year 2020, which is gigantic, right? And right now, I think what's happening is we're we've already hit the limit of the the hardware that we're able to build. And I believe that's where the 3d, all the experiments that they're doing with the hardware, what they want to make with neural networks and stuff, the new design is kicking in. Because Moore's law, every time Moore's law has been flattening out a new form of technology comes in and it continues on doubling every 18 months, right? Are we going to continue on that trend? Possibly, yes, would be my guess, right? Yeah, learning machines sure start to expand exponentially. I've noticed that the accelerator rate of technology is starting to pass the rate at which we can develop morality for new tech technology. Hopefully, the new technology, if it's AI will develop its own morality. And it is morality based on a universal level, not based on our human morality, where we have a different type of morality. Structure based on different races, different species, different life forms, living on our planet, right? Just imagine if AI that comes to be has the same morality that we do, but the worst of us does that considers all other living species to be just a tool for our use, and other races to be incompatible with them or their race, right?  If an AI develops on that front, right? What if an AI develops that looks at the world and says we are all one, we are all stardust, right? Wow, that might be a good thing, right? That might be a good thing. I think like in 10 years when driving yourself by a car will be a choice. Yeah. But I don't think that's AI. That's automation. Yeah.  Yeah. Agreed, agreed, agreed. Audi already created their new A8 with the option to auto drive without giving any attention to the road. Laws only kept it back. Won't take long now, won't take long. And I believe Tesla has the same thing or it can self-drive for 90% of the journey anyway, right? And laws lag disruptive innovation in a big way, right? AI is right now automation. We don't have anything else than automation. When thought is created by binary, then it's still automation. There is no random thought. Okay. And we also have transhumanism right now, Booker. Okay. We have transhumanism with artificial limbs with, you know, you can get implants to improve your hearing, eyes, keep your heart going. We are right now, and have been for a while, but it's kicking up to high gear, merging biology and technology, right? So we're into transhumanism. Mick Silva, how are you doing? Welcome, welcome to another stream. It's current event stream, but surprisingly, what's going on? I think a lot of people burnt out of politics and geopolitics and stuff like this and economics. And we're talking about AI and transhumanism and all this jazz. We talked a little about coronavirus and some geopolitics, but not much, which is great. Yeah, but they are still machinery to improve our thought, not to give us thoughts. In theory, AI can be possible. But I doubt that it will be written in binary. I agree with you. I think we need quantum computing before we can get into AI. There's no doubt about that. And we're quite a ways away from, should I say quite a ways away? I don't, I can't say quite a ways away. Quantum computing will be a game changer. So it really depends on where we are in quantum computing and dial the side when AI will kick in. I don't think quantum computing is going to kick in for another 15 years or so. Once it does, kiss our current economic system goodbye, right? Because quantum computers will be to will be able to break every code, every password there is, right? So what happens if one nation gets a quantum computer? What happens if that nation is a good nation, ruled by good people? What about genetic engineering? Genetic engineering is huge. Bioengineering are getting increasingly better at that. Remember the movie Gadica? Yeah, Gadica was fantastic. If we could selectively remove certain genes, should we, if we human beings have that choice? No, because what's going to happen is we're going to become so specialized, right, that a virus is going to come in and eliminate all of humanity, right? And we're going to be able to do that, right? Right? We can't mess around with a complex system such as life, according to what we know at the moment, because our knowledge is very limited, right? So I'm okay with transhumanism. I'm okay with merging biology and technology together. But I'm not okay with us controlling the biological development, right? Because right there, we're going to start eliminating possible mutations that are a huge upgrade to our biology, right? Based on what we know at the present, when we're limited. And I don't think we'll ever be able to. Nature is much more diverse and anti fragile than we are. Or our thoughts. All right, we're getting deep here. Let's jump to my other favorite topic, quantum physics. Do you think that the fact a particle can exist in several times and places simultaneously? Until it is observed is circumstantial evidence of being in assimilation? Let me catch up on the chat. That's like a huge discussion. Yeah, with quantum computing, we could start touching the subject of true randomness. What free will is all about? Yeah, hey, Chico. Hello, intelligent blueberry. How are you doing? Good brother doing good. Thank you very much. But don't irrational numbers suggest we don't live in a simulation? Yeah, I don't think we live in a simulation personally. Like the quick, quick answer to that is circumstantial evidence of being in assimilation. No, I don't think so. That would, that would assume we know how the universe works, because we're observing this thing or changing the, the direction, the pattern, we're affecting something by observing it, right? I think life is much more complex than Oh, if it's not this, then we must be in a simulation. I don't think we're in a simulation. I don't think there's proof that we're in a simulation. I can entertain the idea, right? But I think we're all living on the same plane. I think who I interact with is just as real as I am. How would you program a number with infinite decimals? I keep hearing about transhumanism. What is it? Transhumanism is emerging of biology and technology, right? Right now, the most rudimentary level is artificial limbs and stuff like this. But just imagine if you could take a chip, if we come up with a chip and implant it in your brain, right, where you do mathematical calculations, right, that allow you to graph pattern, recognize, take any data set and come up with the functions and the equations and create visuals. And hopefully you have a little port that you can output those graphs that your mind is generating, right? What would it be like? Just imagine on the most rudimentary level, if you had two people, let's assume there's two people, one is a transhuman and the other one is not. One, this transhuman has a chip on their brain that can do mathematical calculations and like billions, trillions of calculations in a second and this human being is still punching numbers into the calculator and typing on a computer, right? If these two people are doing trades on the stock market, right? Who do you think is going to be a better trader? Who do you think is going to be making more money? The transhuman, right? Barring any black swan events, which the transhuman should be aware of, right? This person is going to start making way more returns than this person. And as we talked about in the economic system, it's all about differential accommodation. So if this transhuman is able to get 10% return for their investment per year, and this human is only getting 1% return or 2% return or 5% return. In the limit, this transhuman blows away this guy, right? So transhumanism is emerging of biology and technology together to improve the capabilities of the human. And once that happens, on the chip level, it's going to be serious game changer as well, right? I bet that they already have quantum computers with enough cupids to break most 2040 2048 bit encryption and less in little secret basements maybe. I believe in transhumanism, but I think that it will only improve not change. Yeah, it will only improve. It's not going to it is a game changer, but it's not a new entity.  If it makes us it makes any sense. Yeah. Coolio. Well, the only proof we have right now is based in probability theory, which is your neck of the woods mathematics. I'm not smart enough to understand all the ins and outs. But apparently, according to probability theory, it's more likely we're in assimilation than we're not. The that still doesn't prove we're in one. But interesting, how they use mathematics to prove some basis for the theory. Here's the thing coolio with probability theory and stuff like this. It's a theory and it's based on assumptions and whatnot, right? So I looked into this a little bit, but I can't remember that is the articles I read and stuff. I found it interesting. I entertained the idea. But to me, the the best proof is not proof. The best thing I can point to to say that we're living in a simulation is not this probability theory, those articles that I read. For me, it be Planck's constant, right? Planck's constant is basically the idea that there's information can only come to us not continuously, but in small packets. Now, mind you, Planck's length is very, very small. But Planck's constant says that everything that we see in the universe has a certain size to it. The smallest it could go is a Planck length. Now, if that's the smallest you could go as a Planck length, what's smaller than a Planck length? We don't know. According to the laws we know, Planck length is the smallest. So that would mean we're not living in a continuous existence. It's not. There's packets of information, right? So I consider that I associate that with being pixels on a screen. Like if you look at the screen right now, everything looks continuous. But if you zoom into it, it's all little pixels. So Planck's constant is all those little pixels. If that's the case, to me, that's the best thing I could use to say that, okay, oh, we could be living in a simulation. And once I found out about Planck's length, that's when the whole idea of, oh, is this a simulation or not? It wasn't probably theory stuff for me. Cool. I think that being in a simulation makes sense. But by who or what is the simulation been created? A very difficult question. I don't like to touch. Now, one of the theories is what do you call it? We're entities that are just occupying this matter existence, and we're going to move on. So it's a game, right? But it's a very, very advanced game. Possible, possible. But when you're playing a video game, do you really want to constantly think about that this is a game? Or do you want to immerse yourself in the game and lose yourself in the game and enjoy the game to its fullest? For me, when I'm playing video games, I like to lose myself in the game, right? That's why when I play games, I usually do marathon on games, because I just want to think about those things, right? It's like studying something. If I'm studying something, I want to immerse myself in that thing or doing something, right? So if we are in a simulation, it's okay. Keep it in the background if you want, but enjoy the simulation to its fullest, right? Appreciate the game. Yeah, if we're in a simulation, I sadly think that it is something we may never find out. Transhumanism is kind of scary. How do we know we won't alter our human nature if we massively increase our intelligence? Agreed Scarlett Phoenix. Transhumanism is cool. It's interesting. Weren't there leaked documents a few years ago, which theorize on the side of having people microchip to hold your credit score, money and other information on your person? Mick, there are Scandinavian countries, there are already people getting chips in them to do their transactions. I personally would never, right? We may, when we die, which exactly gives me less fear of death? Yeah, which exactly gives me less fear of death? At worst, it'll be cease, I'll be ceasing to exist, which we won't be able to to be conscious in any way. But at best, we get to discover many new secrets of the universe. Coolio, I like your perspective. I think transhumanism, just as genetic engineering should be open sourced, or decentralized, or else centralized institutions will be able to control us even more. Okay, time out. By the way, who mentioned that? The Scarlett Phoenix. Which show was it? I believe it was humans. There's a BBC television series called humans, which was about, which was about AI, artificial intelligence and transhumanism coming online. I believe it was humans where there was black market transhumanism surgeries happening. And they weren't turning out too well. One of the girls ended up putting an eye in there, replacing their eye and their eye was a computer screen that could only look out through one screen like a video cam. So just imagine, that's what it was. So her eye was flipping everywhere. But you know, there was a centralized institution aspect to it to where anybody that got transhuman implants, they had to work for the state. Otherwise, the state would cut off their transhuman implants, right? So all of a sudden, they're just walking biological beings that just have technology in them that doesn't work. So the moral moralistic, like just the moral nature of how this will unfold is ethical nature of it is, we'll see how it goes. Curse of dimensionality, ignore the trolls all ignore. If you see any more trolls, please let me know. I think I timed out the two that were here. Weird. I figured there's enough happening in the world where they can entertain themselves by other things, right? Most of us are currently chipped anyway, since there aren't many people left who aren't addicted to their phones. Yeah. Engineers will know that curse intimately. You're totally right. If something as society shifting as human machine interfaces, having it only available to the super wealthy is going to be bad for the rest of the world. Yeah. Microchip sound absolutely horrific. Handling complete power over if we and hacking the possibility of being hacked, right? If we don't stay in line, do as they say, we risk having our chip switched off and therefore unable to function in society ousted completely. Yeah. I believe in transhumanism myself also. And I don't see it as a as a danger. Been a fan since William Gibson. I think we could genetically engineer a way to enhance cognitive function, to develop new theories and designing new experiments can possibly create a new paradigm in this generation. Purps, how are you doing by the way? Coolio, they do sound horrific, but society does seem to be placing less value on privacy these days. Who's to say people who people would even care enough about being controlled by a government if they had access to the abilities, machine human interfaces with grant and the TV show, the program that I watched dealt with that issue as well. Right. It was quite interesting. Isn't the new Subway punk game about this topic? Possibly. Yes. I love the cyberpunk genre. Yeah, me too. I got myself a VR set for Christmas and found out that it messes with your brain more than I predicted. First nights were very detailed dreams and just crazy. But the final nights of heavy use, use started giving me pixelated dreams, took a four day break that Wow. Yeah, personally, I'm not into I tried them again, a friend had last year. I didn't like I don't like. I'm not sure. But all the new X games are about transhumanism. Is a society controlled under microchips realistic, though? Wouldn't there be many groups, even in the political world, world be so against chipping that government wouldn't be able to pass laws like enforcing microchipping tracking? There's, I don't know, the control of centralized institutions and governments is pretty hardcore right now. Julian Son and Agent No, he's not. You work for the DNC. Go back to the DNC, please. There's a YouTube YouTube who did an experiment where he spent an entire month in VR. Some very strange effects. Yeah, I wouldn't do that personally. There's a video on YouTube on a guy that spent VR. It's insane. Really? That's the one not a month. It spent it spent the entire week playing VR. Yeah. Yeah, I found it out firsthand that it does mess with your brain. Wow. And just imagine these companies advertising capabilities on that personally, I wouldn't give my mind over to these central institutions. I wouldn't. I wouldn't. Not currently realistic. But when you use pop culture to introduce things like microchip, make it look cool and stylish, I'd be willing to bet people would jump a jump on that the idea completely ignoring their own rights as humans. Yeah. And there we've already seen that example through our society with multiple things when privacy censorship and all this jazz right? Wonder if the bacteria in our bodies, body system will make transhumanism hard. Small things like getting some extra memory storage and a calculator sound nice. I'd prefer the chip not being online. Yeah. Nick, Nick, I'm assuming it'd be the same thing as getting certain types of implants that they do right now where you have to take pills so your body doesn't try to purge this technology from your body. There's a short film on hyper reality. Oh, guys, I got drunk and passed on a beach. I don't know. With some guy waking me up there. Hey, hey, hey, are you okay? Took off my headset. Then and it took me five minutes to realize what is real and was not. Wow. The book or I don't I personally wouldn't want to put myself through that stuff. It's rewiring the brain. Be careful. I've seen that one too. It's like digitized schizophrenia. Wait, are we arguing that VR is giving your mind over to centralized institutions? I just got here. So I may have misunderstood. For me, I just dropped out, right? These these games are being made by big companies, right? And because in the gaming industry in the past, there wasn't as much advertising. But in the gaming industry right now, there's advertisement there's been for last 20 years, I guess, right? Pretty that not as much.  For sure, they're going to start doing advertising in VR games, right? Virtual reality games. How is that going to affect you? I personally don't want to get exposed to that. The ultimate transhumanism fantasy for me would be to be able to download information into your brain, like in the matrix. Yeah.


Scott Walker concedes governor's race. Sheboygan County voter turnout tops 80 percent. City of Sheboygan passes 2019 budget. These stories and more on this edition of Community News Review. This is Community News Review, a service WSES TV news content provided by WHBL. Good day, I'm Maddie Fister and this is Community News Review for Wednesday, November 7th, 2018. Wisconsin's Republican Governor Scott Walker narrowly lost his bid for a third term Tuesday to Democratic State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tony Evers. It was the closest governor's race in the state in decades, so close that Walker's Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Clefish said before the race was called that they would likely call for a recount. Under provisions of a law Walker signed last year, candidates who lose by 1 percent or less can demand a recount. Evers' margin on Tuesday was 1.2 percent. Governor Scott Walker officially conceded the race and released a statement Wednesday afternoon on his website congratulating Evers and thanking his supporters. Republican Representative Glenn Grofman has, is being awarded a third term in Congress after he was declared the winner of the Sixth Congressional District. Since the 1960s, that district has been in the hands of the GOP. Grofman's opponent Dan Cole released a statement congratulating him on the victory on Tuesday night. And Grofman's garnered 55 percent of the vote. Cole received 45 percent. Incubant Republican State Senator Devin Lemacue came out on top in the race against Kyle Welton Tuesday night, picking up 44,677 votes. Kyle Welton had 31,683 votes. That amounted to a 59 to 41 percent difference. Republican Terry Katzman of Usberg will continue representing the 26th Assembly District, defeating his challenger Rebecca Clark, 58 to 42 percent. Republican Tyler Vorpigal will continue representing the 27th Assembly District, picking up 60 percent of the votes. And Corey Riesler has been elected sheriff of Sheboygan County. And he was appointed to the post by Governor Walker late last year when Todd Preby announced his retirement. Riesler picked up 33,642 votes. His opponent Philip Schaefer received 18,360 votes. 83 percent of registered voters in Sheboygan County turned out to cast their ballots yesterday. The unofficial election results from the county clerk's office show that the county leaned Republican last night. Wiscott Walker, Brad Chamille, Jay Schroeder, Leah Bookmore, Glenn Groffman, Devin Lemacue, Terry Katzman, Tyler Vorpigal, all taking more votes than their Democratic opponents. Wisconsin may have a new attorney general to go along with a new governor after Josh Call declared victory Wednesday morning. Unofficial vote totals put Call ahead of the incumbent Brad Chamille by around 22,000 votes. In his victory speech, Call said that he'll be pulling Wisconsin from the fight against the Affordable Care Act and to work as a watchdog for his constituents. Chamille has not conceded in the race yet, saying he's waiting for more official vote totals before making that step. In addition to referendum questions on medical and recreational marijuana used and school funding, voters in several Wisconsin counties had their say on non-binding issues surrounding the state's dark store loophole as well. Both Portage County and the city of Merrill passed the straw poll question with overwhelming support. The same goes for voters in Brown, Green Lake, Manitowoc, Winnebago, and Aragami counties as well. Lawmakers have been trying to close the loophole for several years, but have run into roadblocks set up by big box stores who argue that their property should be taxed as if it is a dark or vacant. Municipalities say that the stores should be taxed at a higher rate because they require more services than a store that is closed. They also argue that the lower tax rate for the stores means residents end up paying a higher rate for their taxes to make up the difference. All told, some 17 counties and six cities and villages support their version of the non-binding referendum. The information will now be passed on to state lawmakers in hopes that the tax loophole will be closed in the coming session. The city of Sheboygan passes its 2019 budget and the vote at Monday night's council meeting was unanimous to pass the $128 million spending plan for the city. Last year's budget came in at a price of nearly $122 million. So the new budget will be up by $6.4 million. As for the tax levy, it is going to be increasing by 1.9%. So the owner of a home with an access value of $150,000 would pay $1,489. And that is up 19 cents from the last budget. And that does it for this edition of Community News Review. Join me again next week for another recap of our local news.


Live from Las Vegas, Nevada. It's theCUBE, covering EMC World 2015. Brought to you by EMC, Brocade, and VCE. Welcome back, I'm Stu Miniman with Wikibon.com. Here with my co-host, Steve Chambers, wall-to-wall coverage of EMC World 2015 here in Las Vegas. Always love when we get to talk to the practitioners joining us for this segment. Coming all the way from Melbourne, Australia, first time on theCUBE, Pavel Rojik, senior technical analyst with Skilled Engineering. Pavel, thank you so much for making the trip and for joining us on theCUBE. Thank you. All right, can you tell us, for those that aren't familiar, Skilled Engineering, you're a very large firm, but one that most of us aren't as familiar with, would you tell us a little bit about the company and your role there? So Skilled Group is the largest company in workforce services in Australia. We employ around 50,000 people a year with more than 80 branches across Australia and approximately 20 branches around the globe. Okay, so 20 locations. Can you sketch out a little bit for us, the IT department, how many people they are and your role there? So we have relatively small IT departments, especially the infrastructure one. We have six people in infrastructure. We're doing most of our staff in-house, not using a lot of integrators, not outsourcing any of our jobs. We have quite large development team there. We're developing a lot of stuff. Okay, and when it comes to the infrastructure, it sounds like you've got a big piece of it. Server, storage, network, all of those under you, did I miss something? Yes, security as well. Of course, Steve would keep me honest on the security piece there. So can you talk a little bit about the role of IT and how you helped serve the business? So we need to make sure that our systems are available 24 by seven. We're actually placing people 24 hours a day, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So it's a really big part of the organization and pay calculations. Just imagine some 50,000 people won't get the paychecks on time. I'll ask you, you know what does business critical mean to you? And I think that's the most important way of getting people's paychecks to them, yeah. So in terms of the developers and the IT guys, are you at separate ends of the building? Do you work together? How does that work? No, we actually work close together. We're sitting all together in Melbourne. So all the IT, we have centralized data centers. It's in two locations. One in our main building that we sit and the other one is in Telstra co-location. And it's actually like the operations, IT operations as well, or is that a different group? So you've got developers, you've got the infrastructure guys. Are you running it as well as deploying it? You know, how does? Yes, we are out. So I'm curious, does the term dev ops, does that resonate with what you guys are doing or how do you look at dev ops? Yeah, it is, as I said, we're trying all the time to improve our systems, to give better solutions to our clients and obviously to save costs. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. So we heard yesterday at the EMC code day. I don't know if you attended that, but it was a real successful day and dev ops was the main theme. There's an interesting, a gentleman from Puppet Labs. We had someone from Chef, someone from Puppet Labs. Do you use systems like that to manage your infrastructure? Not right now, but we are definitely looking at it and considering. What do you use today? Do you use any kind of enterprise class management suite? No, not right now. Most of it are script based. We have a lot of customized stuff and there's a lot of test environments and a lot of needs to refresh those test environments frequently. They're quite large. We have probably over 40, 50 VMs per test environment, around four, five Oracle databases and multiple SQL databases. And we can have 10, 12 of those test environments. That should be true. I wonder if you could dig in a little bit for the network for us. So you've got a relatively small team, but it's mission critical. As we know, the network needs to keep up and running or somebody's probably out of a job. Can you tell us what your network looked like? What solutions are you using today? So recently we implemented an active-active topology. We're using VMware as our hypervisor and we're basically moving workloads between two sites. The storage is extremile. We're utilizing Vplex for the active-active topology for the disks and VDXs for the networking. That was actually really interesting. And just in case people don't know, the VDX, that's Brocade's Ethernet product that you're using. That's right. Yeah, what's kind of the size of that, the switching infrastructure that you've got? Any abrupt idea on the ports? So it is quite large. It was like that probably four, five years ago. We grew a lot. We're buying a lot of companies and integrating them. Everything is centralized. So you can imagine the size of the two data centers, right? And, you know, is your network mostly 10 gig today or what's the... Yeah, it's end-to-end 10 gig for the server infrastructure. We have 20 gig fibers between the two data centers. And one VCS fabric in a VDX to be able to accommodate all the active-active topology. Any particular reason for using Ethernet storage? You know, was it like the digital design thinking or is it easy to operate? It was quite easy to configure and to operate and as well troubleshoot later on. Because I think you know fiber channel as well, don't you? Yes, we're using a lot of fiber channel as well. So are the same people managing the fiber channel as the Ethernet? Yes. And what's the product mix that you have? I mean, is it 50 or is there a lot more Ethernet, I would think? So it's probably 50-50. It's actually all the servers and all the storages are connected to both. So we have fiber channel and FCOE in case one of them will fail. The second one is a backup and we're using PowerPath to be able to manage. Well, you really don't want to lose any connectivity, do you? No. That's very impressive.  Once it's all connected and up and running, you know, is someone constantly watching some dials moving or is it kind of, what's that famous phrase? Why I want some walk away, right? Is it that kind of easy? Yeah, so basically what we found is with EMC and Brocade solutions, if the design is right and it's configured correctly, you don't need to touch it, it just works and it works for us really well. We're really happy with the performance and the outcome and the stability of the systems. So Pavel, you're using both the fiber channel and the Ethernet. So, you know, I think everybody knows that EMC and Brocade have had a long relationship. I mean, the fiber channel side, it's over 15 years. Can you talk on the Ethernet side though? I mean, I know EMC has made some announcement, Brocade. Was EMC involved at all in that piece of it? And you know, what did you see from the customer standpoint? Yes, so EMC definitely was involved because the last project that we did probably was around six months ago. So EMC was involved in that process. We actually, what the whole lot is one package, include the Brocade. Yeah, excellent, so how do EMC and Brocade together help you with kind of the future growth of the company? That's a hard question. So, I guess to be able to move the workloads between the data centers and especially for us to be able to shut down one data center and run the whole lot in the other data center without downtime, it's a very big step up. Is that something you do? Because that sounds like a big, scary thing to do, right? Not anymore. Really? Yeah. And the other good thing is that we don't have any more DR tests because we're testing our DR every day. Machines are migrating between data centers with DRS every minute and there's no DR testing or good jobs. So, I guess last question I want to ask you is, do you have any advice for your peers is that they're looking at this space, especially kind of the IP storage networking, what advice would you give them? I think a lot of research, talk to the vendors, talk to EMC and Brocade together. Read on the internet as well, there's a lot of smart people out there. All right, yeah, absolutely, all right. Thank you so much for making the trip. Appreciate you coming on the program, sharing with your peers, because as you said, they're also going to find not just the internet, but talking to those that have gone before and done it. So, thanks for sharing your story. We'll be back with lots more here from EMC World after this quick break.


This study found that the prevalence of multimorbidity varies greatly depending on the number and selection of conditions considered. When considering the two most common conditions, the prevalence rate was 4.6%, while when considering all 80 conditions, it was 40.5%. Additionally, the prevalence rate was much higher in older individuals than in younger ones, ranging from 29% in those over 80 years old to 71% in those under 9 years old. Furthermore, the prevalence rate also differed between condition lists, ranging from 11.1% to 36.4%. This suggests that a standardized approach to defining multimorbidity is necessary, and that researchers should use existing condition lists associated with the highest multimorbidity prevalence. This article was authored by Claire McRae, Megan McMen, Stuart W. Mercer, and others.


Hi, so my name is Jacob Eberhardt and I work at the information systems engineering group at TU Berlin in Germany And I'm here today to talk about Socrates, which is a toolbox for CK snarks on ethereum So let's first look at how Transaction processing works in traditional blockchain networks as you can see on the left the transaction is sent to the network It that then gets validated at the first node and is then broadcast to the other nodes And at some point it gets included into some block after someone solved the proof-of-work problem Now imagine if we had a system like on the right side where a transaction is sent to the nodes in the network But instead of directly being validated on chain they get forwarded to a third party the yellow box here and That's where the transaction processing happens after the processing of chain is done The result is written back to the blockchain and on chain. It is verified to be correct Only that verification would then happen redundantly and not the transaction processing itself So what would be gained through that one thing would be scalability if the Verification is cheaper than redoing or Executing the transaction in the first place if you only have to do the verification on chain then you can increase throughput Also, there is no such thing as the block gas limit that comes into play here because there's no need to circumvent the halting problem a Second aspect is that private information that gets used on that external node Can if we use the right tools be kept private and they do not have to be published to the blockchain at work Which is also what we not have at the moment So what are approaches for that? We've heard an excellent talk by Jason earlier about true bit and true bit is one such approach where you Gain scalability by off-chain and computations and then there's that verification game played on chain and with that you gain scalability Another approach is a non interactive zero knowledge proofs In that case you additionally have zero knowledge That means the private information you use during your processing on that external load. They are not revealed to the network Okay, so what could those non interactive certain knowledge proofs be one Yeah, proven mechanism is CK snarks I think many of you are aware of that technology and it stands for zero knowledge succinct non interactive arguments of knowledge and here are Several key properties of CK snarks So the proofs are short and non interactive that essentially means you can simply take a proof Generated by a prover send it over the network to a verifier and without further communication. It can then be verified Also, we have a certain knowledge property that means some information that goes into the processing Is not revealed to the network later on? Verification cost and that's a big one is independent of the computational complexity of the initial computation So no matter how complex your computation is the cost of verifying a proof is always the same Okay, so that's a key aspect now a little inconvenience is that to specify Computations in a way that you can do certain other proofs on you have to Think in an abstraction. That's not very convenient to most developers So for example, you can specify computations as arithmetic circuits or rank one constraint systems Of course, you can do it, but it's just not convenient to do and that's what yeah impacts usability negatively Let's take a brief look at the process of using CK snarks before we move on to the tool itself because it's necessary background so Here on the left we have a circuit or rank one constraint system that encodes a computation in that case we just multiply two numbers and Demand that that equals another number and for example RSA encryption uses a different a similar construction From that circuit or rank one constraint system the first step is the so-called setup phase which is needed to arrive at the proving key and a verification key that are then later on needed in the proving process So this setup has to be performed once for a circuit or rank one constraint system And then it can be reused over and over again On the right side here, you see the verification process based on the proving key a prover code for example First find the solution for the problem at hand and then generate a proof that it correctly Executed that computation and found a solution and the cool thing is it could Optionally supply all the information that went into the processing But it could also keep some of the information to itself in that example here the prover only supplies set Which is the result of the multiplication and not the factors themselves that went into it and the verifier can then check the Correctness of the computation without redoing it and that is much cheaper that Verification process then the the proving process and with that the execution of the computation itself in the first place Um Socrates so with Byzantium Ethereum added three new pre-compiles that enable CK snark verification on chain So we have elliptic curve addition scalar multiplication and a so-called pairing check But the big question is how do we use that and that's where socrates comes in So the vision of this toolbox is to provide a usable abstraction And tooling to support CK snark's only theorem to actually make them usable The goal is to support the complete process from program code specification to On-chain verification of the execution of that program code It's supposed to seamlessly integrate with the theorem and how it does that we'll see in a minute Socrates comprises several things one is a domain specific High-level language that allows you to specify your computation in a more abstract way than Arithmetic circuits or rank one constraint systems which are inconvenient then we have a compiler which transforms these programs into provable constraint systems and Then there's support for the different phases We need to go through with a CK snark So the setup phase finding a solution to our constraint system Which is the witness computation the proof generation itself and then we can also using the tool Export a solidity smart contract that can then be used to verify the computation on chain Let's briefly look at the language So the language at this point is pretty close to the constraint system But provide some more convenient abstractions to specify circuits So the data type we have is prime field elements You can just think of these as positive numbers Smaller than a huge prime number. So essentially think of it as positive numbers Then we have imperative statements, which is the abstraction most of you should be used to when programming We have assertions. We have loops We have conditionals and we have functions which allow you to Structure your code and keep it a bit less redundant So let's look at an example here for n choose K or binomial coefficient The upper function here computes the factorial We'll not look at that in detail because it's just not important What's more interesting here is the lower part is the main function as you can see the main function here takes two arguments N and K and then there's a return statement now in socrates The arguments of the main function and the value of the return statement are public That means when you prove that computation you use that code to prove the correct execution execution of that code and K and the return value become public if you do not want that to happen if you want to keep that private that Information you can simply not list that as arguments But still use the variables in the processing as we do here and then when you supply the proof and the inputs And on K do not appear in there and all the person verifying that thing would know is that you Computed the binomial coefficient and what the result was but N and K would not be known Let's look at the user perspective and the command line interface or criticism provides you So you start with high-level code you write that high-level code and it gets Compiled to a set of conditions or also called flattened code Based on that you can then find a verifiable Available assignment for that code which is basically a solution to your program and that's called a witness So you can use a tool to find solutions for your programs and it also supports you with a setup phase So you can use a tool to Compute a verification key and a proving key which you will need later on Based on the verification key you can derive a solidity smart contract Deployed to the network and then verify proofs that were generated with the proving key that came out of the same setup phase And to generate a proof there is that generate proof Yeah Command which takes a given witness that you computed previously and the proving key and together you generate a proof that can then be Verified by the smart contract you created beforehand The internal architecture of the tool looks like this. So we start with code in that domain specific language and that goes into a part of Puzzle is then flattened and then you have an interpreter which Compute solution to the program Here you can decide which part of the solution will become publicly available and which part will remain private So here you have the control and then after that we do just some format conversions to Yeah to Interface with the lip snark library, which we use for the CK snark operations themselves Then there's the contract exporter which can be used to Export solidity smart contracts to verify proofs Okay the on-chain proof Verification looks like this. So on the left side here, we have what the socrates to generated is a proof it consists of eight elliptic curve points and inputs on the other side we have a Verification contract which we also generated and that contains a verification key Seven elliptic curve points is what that is made up of and then there's verify function Which uses the new pre-compiles that came with Byzantium to? Yeah, check the validity of the proof and also make sure that the inputs were correct At the moment a verification like that costs around about 1.6 million gas. So actually a lot That means on a Robston testnet we can do four in one block on the main ad It's currently six in one block the gas cost varies a bit with the amount of input parameters we We give with the proof, but the main cost is constant and and rather high a Couple of challenges an outlook of how we want to proceed with socrates What would be cool in the future? So I think for the language to be more usable more convenient We would want additional types. So for example boolean types everything You can do with boolean types can be done now but it's just not as convenient to do it on prime field elements and then some Integers that have a binary representation internally What's very important and that's basically implementation work ahead of us is Domain specific library with important functions. So next thing we need in my opinion is hash function so we can do commitments in circuits and then Signature encryption that would be nice to have also we want to look at integration of other front ends That can also be used to arrive at rank one constraint systems. For example Buffett a generic ck snark challenge that is not specific to socrates, but rather Yeah, always comes up when speaking about ck snark is the trusted setup phase So if you supply a verification smart contract and you want to verify Something someone else proves to you and you're the only one to be convinced You don't have any problem you run the setup and you know that you did it correctly And thus you can trust the proofs and you know that the person proving to you cannot fake proofs because you were in control Of the setup, but if you want to use these proofs to also convinced third parties other parties Observing these proofs on on the blockchain Then they would have to trust you with the setup phase So what would be great if we could eliminate some of that trust by integrating a distributed setup phase? it just would have to become a bit more efficient than it was in the Ccash multi-party computation protocol for example, which they employed to do their trusted setup So I think we'll hear more about that on Friday in the Ck snark breakout session. Hopefully Okay, so the code is open source. It's available on github. You're all welcome to try it out I'm happy to receive your feedback Keep in mind. It's proof of concept and a research prototype at this place. We're actively developing it and We're always happy for people who want to contribute to the further development you can also contact me by email and I want to give Credits to Christianreidwiesner who always Provided very valuable feedback and input in discussions and also to Dennis Kuhnert who contributed a lot to the existing implementation Thank you very much


Aishnava janato, respect his own mother, yes, because... Truth, sattya, implies love, and firmness, agreha, engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force. I thus began to call the Indian movement sattya agreha, that is to say, the force that is born of truth and love or non-violence, and gave up the use of the phrase, passive resistance in connection with it. So much so, that even in English writing, we often avoided it, and used instead, sattya agreha. It was said at that time, right, by people like Einstein and many others, that Gandhi belongs to the ages, right? I mean, not just to India, not just to the world, but he belongs to the ages. Would you like to be like Gandhi? Maybe. I think it's very hard to be like he was. I think he was a great man, and I think he taught many people to fight for their rights in a peaceful way, and that's what we like so much about him. If Gandhi was alive today, how would you reinvent him to be more acceptable to the young generation? I don't think anybody would have required to reinvent Bapu, because Bapu would have been reinventing himself periodically. The man who lived the life of experimentation would never have stagnated. So, he would have reinvented himself as times changed. Let's discuss what Gandhi is. So, we'll do the brainstorming first. Yeah, we can do that. If we see Gandhi, when he was in India before he went to England, he was dressed as a traditional Banyan, how they dressed, when he went to England to study there, he changed himself. He thought that the western people cannot accept him. So, maybe he dressed accordingly so that he could at least say hi, hello to them. The Gandhi view is that there is an intrinsic relationship between your own body and the body politic, and the so-called inert world of nature outside. What he did, in effect, was to transform his own body into a complete ecosystem.  Mr. Chauhan, if Mahatma Gandhi were alive today, would he approve of your water business? Definitely not. And not only Mahatma Gandhi, I think it is way before him, the Banyan community did not accept the concept of selling water. And water is something which you are supposed to give free, and you have matka outside your house from where people can take water. The earth, the air, the land and the water are not an inheritance from our forefathers, but a loan from our children. So we have to hand over to them, at least as it was handed over to us. What do you know about Mahatma Gandhi? He surfed for the nation without any expressions. He wanted to grow the villages, I know something about those. What about young people? Do they want to learn about Mahatma Gandhi? No, they don't want to learn. If we say them, what do they want? It is our ancient period, now if we want the computer period, now we don't want to learn how to do it. Yes, some of them are saying. In India, far too long, we have built individuals. We have to build institutions. And it should be, you know, people should come and take over. I think that is all the, these are some of the learned essence of Gandhi's teachings which are relevant even today. If India is to attain true freedom, then sooner or later, the fact must be recognized that people will have to live in villages, not in towns, in huts, not in palaces. I call him a good lawyer because as I said, lawyer is a lawyer is a profession to ensure peace, harmony, goodness in the society. And the fact that Gandhi was able to do that, I call him an excellent lawyer. What is Mahatma Gandhi? What is his profession? He makes money. Do you think Mahatma Gandhi is relevant in India today? Well, if truth, love and peace and non-violence as a corollary or as the fountain of peace are important to civilization, then he will always remain relevant. Because as he said in his own words, truth, peace and non-violence were as old as the rivers and the mountains and he had not invented them. And so as long as those are important for the existence of humanity, he will always be relevant. There is no such thing as Gandhism and I do not want to leave any sect after me. Was it that you wanted to pull my leg, transporting me to the frozen Himalayan heights of Mahatmaship and claiming for yourself absolution from having to follow my precepts?


RealisticGaming here. We're here in the nightmare elevator roblox. Oh my god is that saw? Dude that is Jigsaw on his tricycle. Okay this is pretty epic. Dude he's legit. Oh my god it's okay. So his tricycle has like some spikes in front of it. Dude this is insane. I would never thought I'd seen Jigsaw riding around in his tricycle killing people. Okay so as you can see this elevator is different than the others.  Dude he's just cruising around in circles. Okay watch out man he's coming for us. Oh my god okay. Dude he like crashed into that guy. Oh my god okay can this thing be over already? It's like a nightmare in here. Oh look there's a TV. But Mr. Jigsaw's over here. Hey chill out man. Dude when is he gonna stop? Oh he just killed my boy right there.  He needs some milk alright. So let's see what's in this elevator. Okay so we got a bendy poster here. It says work hard, work happy. Always watches no eyes. That's Mr. Slenderman and we got bacon soup. And I don't know what that is. It's like a pet or something. And then this is loose lips, loose skips, SCP. Okay I don't know what that is. Like a robot wizard. Oh and then we got the witch doctor. Oh my god Freddy Kruger. Alright let's see what's up with Freddy Kruger out here. Oh my god okay so we can't go to the houses.  Okay so I have no idea where we're going. Where's Freddy at? I did not see Freddy Kruger anywhere. Freddy where is he at? Oh there he is. Oh my god.  We're touching that all I mean. Dude you guys here? Okay let's try to dodge this. Okay we can go out now. Oh no we can't. Great watch out. Glitch is coming for us. Dude he legit killed everyone. Oh my god look at this dude the way he runs. Oh we just lasted our boy. Okay it's just me and Freddy now. It's Freddy versus real. Oh my god I'm out of here man. I'm not a crazy man. Well it's Freddy versus Granny Waffle because I'm Granny Waffle right now. Dude he almost last really got close. Hey you think he got me? Come on buddy you're close you got it. You got a little buddy. Okay oh no it didn't. Alright nice we better survive it. Oh my god is that Bloody Mary? Oh no it's Amara. Oh my god she's walking towards the TV. Dude that is creepy. Oh and she came out from the TV. Okay uh no why are you coming at me? Oh okay so she's a one hit two. Let's get out of here man. I'm not letting her touch you at all. Can we go in here? I want to go inside her world. Oh my god okay we can't. Where is she at? Dude where did she go? Amara? Oh there she is. She's in the elevator trying to hide. She's camping us man. It's not that big for Amara though it's not. Okay big oof. Oh my god wait what? How did he turn giant? Dude that guy went in giant mode. Okay tomorrow's out here on the rampage. I'm going to go back in the elevator. No leave me alone. Why'd she keep following us? It's kind of scary man. Oh my god her arms actually move. It's just pretty cool because in most models her arms just stay there like stiff. Can I have the nose? And we got trapped. Dude she went inside the TV again. That is not cool. Okay so let's go check out the models. They have a lot of models that you can morph into. Which is pretty cool and worth it if you want to buy like the VIP. Wow that's not part of the VIP. That's a different game pass. Okay so let's get my coil here. Let's go straight out over here to the morph room. Alright there's so many. What? They're teleporting me to the top. Alright there you go. Okay so they got the red wolf. They got jigsaw, bandia, robot, SCP-96, Batman, Joey. Wait that's not, wait that's like Jason's mask under it. What? It's okay whatever. That's a Skeletor, headless horse on the Joker. That's like Sans or something. I don't know what this thing is. It's like a devil or something. Oh my god this dude looks scary. Let's be leather-faced. And then they got more SCPs than Ghostface over there. So let's head back to the elevator. Oh my god can I see the morph? Dude he looks so creepy with the waffle. Like his face is just sticking out of the waffle. Dude that is, okay that is scary man. That is so creepy. Oh my god. Okay let's go back in the elevator. It seems like Mr. Hallow Neighbor is out. Oh look his giant house. Alright let's go see where Mr. Neighbor is. Oh he's outside. Hey get out of the bedroom Ghostface. Okay so can you upstairs? No you can't. And why would you out of the whole house if you can't even go upstairs? Dude you don't fit through there. What are you doing? Okay there you go. Where do you get that? I want to get that thing. It looks fun. Hey Mr. Neighbor how's it going? Oh okay so let me survive that. Oh Bendy let's go see Bendy. Oh my god a team in Bendy. Oh how did he get me? I was already inside the room. Okay so it seems like Mr. Bendy has a reach. We have to be careful every time we go near him. Okay so what's on the other side? There's like so many routes out here. I have no clue where they take you. Okay let's just turn into the sands right here. Alright so this model is definitely broken. I can't move from here. My body's just stuck right here man. Somebody help. Okay I'm stuck here. I think I'm about to reset. We're out here. Oh my god is it the Slendy Tummies? Dude look at this world. It's on fire. Okay where the Slendy Tummies at? Oh my god you guys hear the screams? Oh my god okay there's one Slendy Tummy up here. What is he doing? He was just standing up there screaming his life away. And that scream was kind of scary. Oh my god what's wrong with the Lissa? Are you okay Lissa? What is she on the ground? Oh my god okay somebody help her. Alright there you go. Okay what's up Mr. Ghostface? What are you looking at? Wait oh my god what is that thing? I have no idea what that is. If you guys know let me know in the comments. Oh my god there's like multiple. Oh dude they're shooting. Oh my god oh okay. There's a lot of shards right here. Which these give you a lot of points but that dude keeps on shooting us. That is not cool. What is that thing? It's like a little piggy.  Dude they're ganging up on the poor dude. Oh my god no. Okay I don't know how to survive that dude. It's just like a lot of people shooting you left and right. It's so crazy in there. That was so hectic man alright. Let's go back here and grab the coil. And then I'll turn into, I don't want to turn into this dude because then he'll get us stuck here. Ultra VIP speed coil. Why did I just see this thing here? I had no clue it was here. Okay let's get out of here. Oh you guys hear that? Coil powering up. Okay so these morphs in here are definitely broken. Because every time you get them they bring you back. And they get you stuck here man. They're a trap. Okay let's reset. Only Alyssa survived. Oh my god. Gigi's to Alyssa man and she was the only one that was on the floor. Maybe that's her tactic huh? Lay on the ground to think around.  Okay let's grab this. I'm not going to turn into anything here. Because these are the cursed morphs. That's what we'll call them.  You guys hear that? Oh my god. Oh we're in Granny's house. Oh my god I almost stepped on the trap. Hey beautiful Granny. Yeah you're not so beautiful huh? Okay is there any coins in this map? I don't think there is. I don't want to step on the trap dude. There's just so many of them. I'll see you. Yo you can't see me I'm downstairs. That is not possible man. Like X-ray vision. Granny's out here hacking you guys. That might be the only solution. Okay I can't get up here. Oh! Dude I cannot fight. Oh no I'm stuck right here. No Granny please! Oh my god okay. We barely managed to get around. Alright let's go this way. I'm hiding in the kitchen. She's trying to get us. She's in the staircase. Hey Grandma. Dude look at her legs. She can't even match her upper body. No! I don't want to play hide and seek with you. Just leave me alone. I want to get some coins man. Okay let's go upstairs. Oh my god no there's a trap. Dude Granny has hops man. Alright nice he survived. Dude that was so close. Oh my goodness I thought I was a god in there for a second. Where's real? Alright here man can't you see me?  He jumped off man. Alright let's go. Right who is this? I don't know but let's go out and see. Oh my god. Okay he's like floating. Dude that's pretty cool. Okay let's grab the coin over here. Dude where are these for? I don't even know some of these killers. Pretty cool though. Dude he's trying to smack me. He will not smack. Okay so if we can get a close look. There's giant eyes under that hat. That is pretty weird man. Okay I'm trying to see what this guy looks like but he won't stop smacking me. Can you like stop smacking me? And he just killed me? You gotta be kidding me man. Alright that guy was definitely insane. Okay SCP-354 Subject class Keter. How do you pronounce that? I don't know but let's go.     Oh my god it's so slow without a speed coil. I don't not like this. Yo what's up bookmarks? Okay so hopefully we can make it in time because they walk super slow right there you go. Oh my god look at this. Okay so where's the SCP at? I don't see him anywhere. Oh you have to cross over there. Can you make this jump right nice? Dude there's so many blood. Oh my god. And I just died again. Oh my god that was raining out here. What? Okay that's pretty cool. Right so let's see if we can get on. Oh no we didn't make it back in time. I wanted to get on the island.  I've never seen a map like that. It was pretty cool though. Alright let's see how do you get that thing? It's been called. The cat has like a crazy face on it. Oh he shrunk back to normal.  Is he? Yes he's dead. Look at him. Alright guys. Oh Cap Crystal Lake. Oh my god Jason. Dude Jason is died here guys. Oh look and this is even where they push him off into the water. In the lake. Oh my god everybody come to the lake. It's Jason's weakness. The water is his weakness. He's trying to take him in the lake. Jason come over here. Follow my steps. Come over here. Come on buddy you got it. No come over here. Listen to me. Don't pay attention to all. Jason come over here. Oh! And he just slashed me with one hit. That was not cool Jason come on. Oh my god. Alright you guys well this was a nightmare elevator roblox.  Well thank you guys for watching. Thank you guys for the support. If you guys enjoyed the video make sure to slap the like button. If you're new to the channel make sure to subscribe and turn that notification bell on. And I will see you guys in the next one.