In our last list we took a look at the top 10 best superheroes, but not all superheroes come from comics So here's the top 10 superheroes from cartoons in no particular order Coming in at number 10 we have He-Man and the Masters of the Universe Okay, so technically He-Man did get his start in comic which came included with the action figures But he's more known for his time on TV with his sort of power He-Man fights the evil forces of Skeletor to protect Eternia At number 9 we have The Thundercats Over the course of 130 episodes which many shows don't even make it halfway to today Lion Owen and his group of cat-like warriors fought the immortal, demonic wizard, Mum-Ra Right now at number 8 we have Mummies Alive Mummies Alive follows a group of four mummies who've awakened in the modern age after 3500 years to protect their reincarnated pharaoh Prince Rapsys who's now taken on the life of Presley Carnovan A 12 year old boy against the evil of the pharaoh's advisor, the evil Scarab At number 7 we have Mighty Max Based on the pocket toyline of the same name which was meant to rival Polly Pocket for girls The series follows Max, an adventurous, pre-teen boy who receives a statue of a fowl inscribed with the Egyptian hieroglyphs Which translate as, you have been chosen to be the cat bearer Go to the minimart and wait for a sign, Mighty Max Max has given a red baseball cap which bears a yellow M on it The cap is capable of projecting wormhole-like portals so that Max can travel through space and time Accompanied by his anthropomorphic fowl known as Virgil and his guardian Norman, his Viking-like bodyguard The three fight the evil of Skullmaster At number 6 we have the Biker Mice from Mars The Planet of Mars which was populated by anthropomorphic mice who love motorsports But after the greedy fish-like race of Plutarchians, wiped out the planet Three survivors found a ship and escaped to Planet Earth where Lawrence Limburger, who is secretly a Plutarchian With an odd obsession with Earth's 1930s criminal society Plus, I mean come on, one of the Biker Mice by the name of Vinnie is played by the hero of Sharknado himself, Ian Zearing What's not to love about that? We're at the halfway point with number 5, Disney's Gargoyles Over three seasons the series followed a group of creatures that were recently freed from a magical curse of 10,000-year-old Stone Sleep With the help of Detective Eliza Maza, Goliath and his tribe defend the city of New York against billionaire David Xanatos and other evil forces Right now at number 4 we have Captain Planet Taking pollution down to zero, Captain Planet and the Planet Tears followed the adventures of the popular environmental superhero group Five teenagers given magic rings by Gaia, the spirit of the Earth And when their powers combine, they summon Captain Planet The number 3 spot belongs to Space Ghost Before taking his turn as a popular late night talk show host on Cartoon Network Space Ghost was an intergalactic hero who fought villains such as Zorak and Multar Alongside his sidekicks, Jan, Jace and their Monkey Blip We're almost done because at number 2 we have Gizmo Duck Gizmo Duck is the famous superhero of the Disney Duck Tales and Darkwing Duck Universe Appearing in both shows on a number of occasions It would seem that Gizmo Duck is a cross between Iron Man, Robocop and Superman for the Disney Universe At number 1, the moment you have all been waiting for We have Darkwing Duck Darkwing Duck is a cross between the Shadow Batman and Donald Duck for the Disney animated universe Drake Mallard took up the mantle of Darkwing Duck at the suggestion of his adopted daughter Goslin and his friend Launchpad McQuack to fight crime in St. Canard There you have it guys in no particular order, the top 10 superheroes from cartoons Do you agree with our list? Leave a comment below and let us know Thanks for tuning in to Comic Gettin TV where all geek culture collides If you're new to the channel be sure to hit that subscribe button so you don't miss out on future videos I'm Shannon for Comic Gettin TV, take care my friends


We continue on today with Chapter 7, The Last Step. The creative power of God and His creations is limitless, but they are not in reciprocal relationship. You communicate fully with God, as He does with you. This is an ongoing process in which you share, and because you share it, you are inspired to create like God. Yet in creation, you are not in a reciprocal relation to God. Since He created you, but you did not create Him. I have already told you that only in this respect, your creative power differs from His. Even in this world, there is a parallel. Parents give birth to children, but children do not give birth to parents. They do, however, give birth to their children, and thus give birth as their parents do. If you created God and He created you, the kingdom could not increase through its own creative thought. Creation would therefore be limited, and you would not be co-creator with God. As God's creative thought proceeds from Him to you, so must your creative thought proceed from you to your creations. Only in this way can all creative power extend outward. God's accomplishments are not yours, but yours are like His. He created the sonship, and you increase it. You have the power to add to the kingdom, though not to add to the Creator of the kingdom. You claim this power when you become vigilant only for God and His kingdom. By accepting this power as yours, you have learned to remember what you are. Your creations belong in you as you belong in God.  To create is to love. Love extends outward simply because it cannot be contained. Being limitless, it does not stop. It creates forever, but not in time. God's creations have always been, and you can create only as God creates. Eternity is yours because He created you, eternal. The ego on the other hand always demands reciprocal rights because it is competitive rather than loving. It is always willing to strike a bargain, but it cannot understand that to be like another means that no bargains are possible. To gain, you must give, not bargain. To bargain is to limit loving, giving, and this is not God's will. To will with God is to create like Him. God does not limit His gifts in any way. You are His gifts, and so your gifts must be like His. Your gifts to the kingdom must be like His gifts to you. I gave only love to the kingdom because I believed that was what I was. What you believe you are determines your gifts, and if God created you by extending Himself as you, you can only extend yourself as He did. Only joy increases forever, since joy and eternity are inseparable. God extends outward beyond limits and beyond time, and you who are co-creator with Him extend His kingdom forever and beyond limit. Eternity is the indelible stamp of creation. The eternal are in peace and joy forever. To think like God is to share His certainty of what you are, and to create like Him is to share the perfect love He shares with you. To this the Holy Spirit leads you, that your joy may be complete because the kingdom of God is whole. I have said that the last step in the reawakening of knowledge is taken by God. This is true, but it is hard to explain in words because words are symbols, and nothing that is true need to be explained. However, the Holy Spirit has the task of translating the useless into the useful, the meaningless into the meaningful, and the temporary into the timeless. He can therefore tell you something about this last step. God does not take steps because His accomplishments are not gradual. He does not teach because His creations are changeless. He does nothing last because He created first and for always. It must be understood that the word first, as applied to Him, is not a time concept. He is first in the sense that He is the first in the Holy Trinity itself. He is the prime Creator because He created His co-creators. Because He did, time applies neither to Him nor to what He created. The last step that God will take was therefore true in the beginning, is true now and will be true forever. What is timeless is always there because its being is eternally changeless. It does not change by increase because it was forever created to increase. If you perceive it as not increasing, you do not know what it is. You also do not know who created it. God does not reveal this to you because it was never hidden. His light was never obscured because it is His will to share it. How can what is fully shared be withheld and then revealed? And from the workbook, Lesson 45 God is the mind with which I think. Today's idea holds the key to what your real thoughts are. There is nothing that you think you think. Just as nothing that you think you see is related to vision in any way. There is no relationship between what is real and what you think is real. Nothing that you think are your real thoughts resemble your real thoughts in any respect. Nothing that you think you see bears any resemblance to what vision will show you. You think with the mind of God. Therefore you share your thoughts with Him as He shares His with you. They are the same thoughts because they are thought by the same mind. To share is to make a like or to make one. Nor do the thoughts you think with the mind of God leave your mind because thoughts do not leave their source. Therefore your thoughts are in the mind of God as you are. They are in your mind as well where He is. As you are part of His mind, so are your thoughts part of His mind. Where then are your real thoughts? Today we will attempt to reach them. We will have to look for them in your mind because that is where they are. They must still be there because they cannot have left their source. What is thought by the mind of God is eternal, being part of creation. Our three five-minute practice periods for today will take the same general form that we used in applying yesterday's idea. We will attempt to leave the unreal and seek for the real. We will deny the world in favor of truth. We will not let the thoughts of the world hold us back. We will not let the beliefs of the world tell us that what God would have us do is impossible. Instead we will try to recognize that only what God would have us do is possible. We will also try to understand that only what God would have us do is what we want to do. We will also try to remember that we cannot fail in doing what He would have us do. There is every reason to feel confident that we will succeed today. It is the will of God. Begin the exercises for today by repeating the idea to yourself, closing your eyes as you do so, then spend a fairly short period in thinking a few relevant thoughts of your own, keeping the idea in mind. After you have added some four or five thoughts of your own to the idea, repeat it again and tell yourself gently, my real thoughts are in my mind. I would like to find them. Then try to go past all the unreal thoughts that cover the truth in your mind and reach to the eternal. After all the senseless thoughts and mad ideas with which you have cluttered up your mind are the thoughts that you thought with God in the beginning. They are there in your mind now, completely unchanged. They will always be in your mind exactly as they always were. Everything you have thought since then will change, but the foundation on which it rests is wholly changeless. It is this foundation toward which the exercises for today are directed. Here is your mind joined with the mind of God. Here are your thoughts one with his. For this kind of practice only one thing is necessary. Approach it as you would an altar dedicated in heaven to God, the Father, and to God, the Son. For such is the place you are trying to reach. You will probably be unable as yet to realize how high you are trying to go, yet even with the little understanding you have already gained, you should be able to remind yourself that this is no idle game, but an exercise in holiness and an attempt to reach the kingdom of heaven. In the shorter exercise periods for today, try to remember how important it is to you to understand the holiness of the mind that syncs with God. Take a minute or two as you repeat the idea throughout the day to appreciate your mind's holiness. Stand aside, however briefly, from all thoughts that are unworthy of him whose host you are, and thank him for the thoughts he is thinking with you. God is the mind with which I think. So today we open up to the remembrance of our real thoughts, the thoughts in which we think with God, the thoughts which we share and extend as a creation of God, as co-creator in spirit, opening in stillness to our real thoughts, opening to the feeling of deep holiness, remembering that ideas leave out their source. Our real thoughts are the same as God's thoughts. They are of a like quality, pure, innocent, eternal, and this sinking inward is rising very high, higher than anything imaginable. All the way back to the original thoughts we think with God to our eternal thoughts, thoughts that have no form, that increase forever because of God, because of the Creator. This increase has nothing to do with time, size, or shape, or quantity. This increases love forever and ever extending, radiating our real thoughts, add to creation, ever increasing it. And we are very humble in seeing that we can add to the Kingdom of Heaven. We cannot add to God that we can extend these beautiful thoughts of God as we think like God. We give our heart to this exercise today. We give our all. We give everything to remembering our real thoughts, the thoughts we think with God as we say in deep remembrance, God is the mind with which I think.


Now when I got this notification that the Ravens hired Adrian Dixon as their new head certified athletic trainer, I was a little bit worried because I saw that he came from the Titans and my first thought that came to my mind was why if they are trying to prevent injuries, why would they hire the trainer from the team that had even more injuries than the Ravens? But this is why you should always think before you speak. So I looked, did a tiny bit of research, looked up what James and Hensley and Jeff Srebic was saying about him and this was it. James and Hensley said, New Ravens head trainer, Adrian Dixon most recently served as the Titans director of physical therapy and sports rehabilitation. He designed and managed the rehabilitation and treatment programs for injured players, also overseeing their progression back onto the field. So he's not here to prevent injuries so to speak. He's more so to make sure the players recover the right way. And I can appreciate that because both Eric DeCosta and John Harbaugh both said that they will be turning over every stone trying to get this thing right when it came to injuries. They will be going through everything that went wrong and trying to correct it, making any adjustments that they possibly could. And this is a start. So I can appreciate this because this is putting action to words. Cause you could go up there on the podium, you could talk a good talk, but if you're not following through with action then whatever you said means nothing. So let's read the statement from the Ravens and Eric DeCosta. It says we are excited to announce the addition of Adrian Dixon as our new head athletic trainer. Over the course of the last month, after meeting with multiple qualified candidates, it became quite evident that Adrian possessed all the traits and skills necessary to help us become the best player wellness program in the national football league. We were so impressed by Adrian's servant leadership, his passion for the challenge and his vision for our training room. Adrian will work closely with Dr. Andy Tucker, our chief medical officer and lead a talented and respected staff of trainers, including Ron Medlin, Kevin Dombosky and Mike Blankenship among others. Adrian will start Wednesday and lead us at the combine next week at Indianapolis. And that's from Eric DeCosta. So again, I like the move. You're getting somebody that, again, not trying to prevent injuries, we're actually trying to prevent further injuries because this could help with the Ravens and making sure that when somebody gets hurt, that they are all the way healed when they on the way back. Because Ravens, obviously from experience, especially last year with Ronnie Stanley, he came back, but he wasn't ready yet. With Nick Boyle, he came back, but he wasn't ready yet. With Derek Wolf, he wasn't ready. So, and then, and now this helps for guys that you also got that could help your team next year. And somebody who we just spoke of, Ronnie Stanley, he is probably the biggest question mark heading into the Ravens 2022 season. And the Ravens are paying him a lot of money. He's making a lot of cash. And it's crazy because we always say that timing is everything. It's always, when you look back, it's always crazy how that worked out or how it really didn't work out. Cause Ronnie Stanley got his bread, got his contract and a couple of days later, boom, out for the year and nothing was ever the same after that. So with Ronnie Stanley, you know, the goal for him is obviously to play this upcoming season and play a full season, but just for him to be ready and be all the way ready. Not a 75% Ronnie Stanley, not a 80%, not an 85, no, all the way ready. He pretty much had the whole season to get right. I know he waited a little while before he decided to do the surgery, cause he wanted to do rehab first, but that wasn't working. So he said, I'll do the surgery. And all right, let's see how it works. So good move by the Ravens, but now I'm interested. So this is again, this is the rehabilitation, the physical therapy. This is the get back program for anybody that gets hurt, but I want to see how the Ravens really addressed the preventative program now. How are they going to handle that? Now I would take a page from the Rams notebook where they were doing something with soccer and I forgot exactly what it was, but I would just look around the league. And if I was the GM or I was the owner or whatever, I would look around the league and look at teams and look at their track record. I would pull up the analytics on those teams' track records when it came to injuries. How many injuries have they had? How many types of injury like ACL versus Achilles versus ankle sprint versus all that stuff? You know, so some injuries just happen on a field as football is a physical sport, so it's gonna happen. But I would look to all of that. Look at the injuries, look at the recovery time, also look at what type of injuries those players had happened. And more so look at the injuries that those players had happened before the season even started or off the field injuries, so to speak. And I would try to look and examine carefully the details of different teams who faced the least amount of injuries. Look at what works for them, what their steps are, what their routines are and just imitate it. And hopefully it'll work for you. Team Keep It Clean, I appreciate y'all, I love y'all, we out.


All right everyone, welcome back. It's Veronica Howard. So in this third unit we're talking all about antecedent control and the way in which the context or the stimuli that occur before behavior influence the response that our learners emit. Previously we've talked a little bit about stimulus control. How does behavior become more likely in the presence of certain environmental circumstances? And so when we're talking about teaching and evoking or setting the occasion for responses, it's great when we have behavior that's occurring frequently, when we have behavior that's happening a lot. Sometimes that doesn't happen. Sometimes the behavior doesn't occur naturally in the presence of a desired antecedent stimulus. So what we have to do is kind of set the occasion or create an artificial way of getting the behavior to happen so we can capture it. That's what we're going to talk about today. We're going to be talking about prompting and the prompt hierarchies in this first section. But first let's begin with a little review. Remember that we were talking about where and when behavior happens. So we know that a discriminative stimulus is a stimulus that precedes a behavior and it's present only when reinforcement will occur for that response. So it's kind of like the stimulus that tells you where and when and under what circumstances to emit the behavior so you can earn the reinforcer. We can do a formal procedure called discrimination training where we make the behavior happen in a narrower range of environmental circumstances where we narrow down how often or under what circumstances a person emits that response. And we do that by reinforcing the behavior when it happens under certain circumstances or in one stimulus context and we extinguish the behavior in all of the responses. But again in this discrimination training paradigm you have to have the behavior occurring at least a little bit so you can capture it with reinforcement. We also refer to that behavior as being under stimulus control in stimulus controls that increased probability of the behavior happening in the presence of the discriminative stimulus. If you have behavior that doesn't occur it can't come under stimulus control and if we're trying to increase the probability of behavior happening we have to move to something called prompting. So prompting is an additional antecedent stimulus it's something that we add to the environment before behavior occurs to increase the probability that the person is going to make a correct response or they're going to emit the behavior that will contact reinforcement. And we're trying to the aim of prompting is to increase the probability of a response under certain circumstances so that eventually we can fade out or remove that prompt and have a natural SD takeover and maintain that response. When we're talking about using prompting we do this because the behavior doesn't happen under stimulus control it's not happening naturally and we need it to happen. So for instance imagine that I'm working with a client in this case maybe my client is my dog and I say that my dog knows how to sit which means that I've seen evidence that the behavior is in my dog's repertoire but the dog doesn't emit the behavior when I'm giving them the instruction to sit. So we see that we have that response sit but it's not occurring when it should be. The antecedent stimulus is sit that's the antecedent that we want to control the behavior that's the target discriminant stimulus and we want to bring behavior under control of that response. I give the instruction and dog doesn't respond. So what I can do is I can add in a particular hand gesture that's known to work really well.  This works for about 80% of dogs. So my natural discriminative stimulus the stimulus that I want to control the behavior has the instruction sit but what I'm going to do at least for a little bit is I'm going to add in a kind of gestural prompt I'm going to use my hand and just kind of you know trick the dog into sitting and then eventually when they start to get it I can remove that prompt. When we're talking about using prompting effectively do bear in mind that I might start here by giving that instruction and then use the treat to kind of lure the dog into the position. This is a gestural or a positional prompt when that dog is in the sitting position I absolutely have to give the reinforcer. So it's not that we can just prompt and prompt and prompt and the behavior will happen and we just we're thankful for it you must give the reinforcer and then we're going to continue doing these trials with the prompt until the dog gets pretty fluent so I'm going to give the instruction sit and then I'm going to do the hand and then we're going to if they sit give the reinforcer then I'm going to give the instruction sit and we're going to do the hand then if they said give them the reinforcer and you'll start to notice they get quicker the faster over time almost like the behavior is starting to come under control of at least one of those stimuli but I have to be careful because if I'm not being mindful of how I'm using that prompt they could become a little bit dependent on it so I have to really be careful when I'm using prompting because prompts have to be removed and we have to remove them again because of something called prompt dependence and this is when the client only emits the desired target behavior when whoever is doing the teaching is using that prompt now prompt dependence you can combat this a few different ways first of all make sure you're using prompts only when you absolutely need to so if the behavior can occur naturally and you never needed to use a prompt don't do it to begin with second you can make sure that you're only using those prompts for as long as necessary to foster a generalization like to get the behavior to happen in the presence of more stimuli or to foster discrimination to make sure the behavior only happens under certain circumstances and you want to make sure that you're planning on how you're going to decrease and withdrawal those prompts effectively when we talk about prompts there can be lots of different kinds of prompts we can have a physical prompt which is where I'm actually physically touching the learner and kind of moving them into position positional prompts could be myself putting myself in relation to the the learner in some way we can do verbal prompts like giving instructions or just small hints we can do gestural prompts like maybe pointing at things or if I'm talking to someone online and I can't hear them I might go like this to kind of indicate that I can't communicate I can't hear that information we also do visual prompts so sometimes we can do things like add a little sign or change the color of something lots of different prompt categories that you could use but typically when we're talking about using these in teaching folks will describe what are called prompt hierarchies which is just another way of describing how we're going to go about using these are we going to go in what's called a most to least prompting hierarchy in a most to least prompting hierarchy what we do is we start with the most intrusive level of prompting and that would be a full physical and then we might fade back a little bit into a partial physical into a modeling into a gestural so on and so forth where are we going to start with least to most intrusive prompting right so in this particular case what we're talking about here is do we want to and I'm going to go back do we want to go most to least so do we want to start as intrusive as possible then fade out as the learner gains independence or do we want to go least to most where we only layer on additional support as the person needs it there are some reasons why you might choose one over the other let's go back to most of least you might choose most of these prompting because you don't want the learner to make any mistakes if it's a really high pressure situation if someone could be harmed if making mistakes will be detrimental for the learner or someone that they serve in some way definitely use most of least it's been suggested that folks who are really averse to experiencing extinction might benefit from most of least folks who experience intellectual or developmental disability could benefit from most of these prompting in a most of these prompting paradigm you have the highest probability that the learner is going to admit the correct response but there are some drawbacks here in most of these prompting you always have to be very very careful that you're removing or you're moving down the prompt hierarchy levels as quickly as you possibly can because most of these prompting can quickly foster prompt dependence this can be a situation where the learner kind of stops trying on their own and they'll rely on others to help them it can also be pretty difficult because depending on the learner that you serve remember that these are very physically intrusive levels of prompting and again depending on your learner if you were to start with a full fiscal and you don't know a lot about the client that you serve it could be dangerous for the person who's using that level of prompting so always respect the autonomy of your client only touch a client if you have their permission if you've actually asked them and you're making sure that it's okay and it's not disrespectful for them in some way and again you're trying to remove these as quickly as possible so that you're getting to independence so try to probe down to uh lower levels of prompting as much as possible with least the most prompting there are some benefits here first this is less likely to result in prompt dependence because you're only layering on more intrusive levels of prompting as you need them uh this level of of prompting can also kind of respect the autonomy of your client because you're following their lead but there are some drawbacks here as well this level or this hierarchy of prompting uh is most likely to be one where the learner is going to contact some extinction because you have to go through multiple levels of prompting before you get down to the level where the learner will actually emit the response so this can also take a little bit longer this can take more trials and more time to help support someone and so you just have to figure out what's going to work best for your client one uh word of advice that I would provide is remember the analysis part of behavior analysis so look closely at the client that you're serving uh no take the information that you know about your client and use it to guide what you're going to do if you know that you work with a client who benefits really well from gestural prompting and you often have to go down to that level uh start there right started gestural go into modeling and so on and so forth but know the information about your client watch very very closely for times when maybe they're demonstrating a little independence so you can be fading back and removing that uh that prompting hierarchy and going back to independence as quickly as possible and always be having a plan for how you're going to be removing prompts so that you're battling prompt dependence so just to quickly summarize this section remember prompts are those additional antecedent stimuli that we add to increase the probability of a response when it isn't occurring naturally in the presence of a discriminative stimulus the overuse of prompts can cause prompt dependence so only use prompts as much as necessary and remove them as quickly as you can you don't want to be in a situation where the learner is dependent on the prompt because one uh they're not independent right and independent and full living is something that we're aiming for for all of our clients and two you you can kind of get a little bit resentful of the client if they're always relying on that prompt i'm thinking of some folks that i've served like teenage boys who will only do the chore when you tell them to do the chore we really want that independence so we try to fade that out as much as possible and capture those naturally occurring discriminative stimuli in the environment and then remember we do have these prompting hierarchies they give us a kind of quick reference for the level of intrusiveness and where you start there are benefits for most at least and least to most and you want to use the one that's going to be best for your client if you're trying to maximize independence you may want to go from a least to most if you're trying to reduce the overall number of errors that folks make you want to use most at least thanks so much for joining me i'll see you next time


Hey there friends! Thanks for checking in. Today we're going to do a comparison with the CZ-P10S versus the HK VP9SK. Both incredible double stacked 9mm polymer frame striker fire handguns that are excellent. And both would make a great CCW choice. Let's take a look at the slide length. We'll see that the CZ goes just a little bit longer, not much. And with the grip length we'll see that they are essentially the same. The one thing that sets them apart is the magazine release. Now the VP9SK has a trigger guard mag release that is ambidextrous. You can drop it with your trigger finger there and it comes with a 10 round magazine. It also has another magazine with an extended base plate allowing for three finger contact. But this is the 10 round mag. Also available is a 13 round mag. And with the CZ-P10S it is ambidextrous but it has to be switched over. So it comes on the left side of the gun, nice mag release and a 12 round magazine. So if you look at the magazines they look they're the exact same size but the CZ is able to pack in two additional rounds. Now the grip on the HK is pretty phenomenal. They have incredible ergonomics and they really work hard to custom fit the hand size. They have interchangeable grip panels and back straps, slight finger groove in there.  If you work all that stuff and I certainly appreciate what HK does. They have some of the best ergos in the market. And we'll check this, unloaded. Now CZ did a great job as well. It does have interchangeable back straps, a bit tacky. You definitely feel it. It is dialed down a bit from the P10C which was extremely aggressive. I think they dialed down some of the aggressiveness and made it real comfortable. But all things considered I have to give the HK with the ergos. It's just hard to beat. I think it'd be very hard to beat. Now the P10S is pretty phenomenal. It does have a three and a half inch barrel. It does have front serrations there, an accessory rail. This particular model is optic ready. A lot of people are using optics on their carry guns now.  Very nice setup, excellent shooter. You know, I shot these side by side. I do not get a lot of footage from the shooting side by side. But I will say that they both shot amazing. I mean, you're looking at two phenomenal guns from two excellent companies that do such a nice job. Now here we have the VP9SK front serrations, 1913 rail there. This has three dot luminescent sights. The luminescent when charged by light gives a night sight effect. They are not night sights because if they're not charged by light, you'll get a dull picture. But when charged by light, they brighten up quite a bit. Now let's take a look. Now before I move on, the barrel length is just under three and a half inches. Just a little bit shorter, nothing that's even noticeable. Both ambidextrous guns. Alright, slide stop, a little different on the right side than the left side. And over here we have slide stop, very similar on each side. Let's take a look at the trigger here. The HK, I measure at five and a half pounds, reset right there. No over travel at all. Both have a trigger bar safety. And nice. Another thing the VP9SK has is a striker fire indicator. See that red dot? When charged there, when you're no longer charged, the striker fire indicator goes away. I measured just a little bit lighter, quarter pound lighter. Five and a quarter pounds here with the CZ. I like this trigger pull. I'm giving it the CZ for the trigger because that to me just feels excellent. No over travel either, a little shorter reset, but right there. Trigger bar safety and that one as well. We're looking at about five to five fifty. We're looking at a little less with this, not with this model though. With the optic ready model with a little bit more with the night sight as well. And this with night sights goes about six and a quarter. So we're looking at similar prices just a little bit less with the CZ. Especially when it doesn't have the optic ready model. I like this though. I really do. Let's take a look at the internals. Both very simple to take apart and reassemble. There's your barrel captured recoil spring and guide rod. CZ disassembles just as easy, albeit a bit different. The dual recoil spring is not captured, but it really doesn't make a difference. Let's start with the VP9 SK. Ten rounds loaded up. 124 grain nine millimeter wing in at twenty eight and three quarters ounces. The CZ I have 12 rounds loaded up. So we have two additional rounds, no round in the chamber. Wing in at 30 and a quarter ounces. So that's a little bit heavier. That does have two additional rounds. So we have 30 and a quarter ounces. Let's just fun. Put two more rounds here. And we're looking at 29 and five eighths ounces. So if the ammunition capacity is the same, the weight is within a half ounce difference. Both these subcompact handguns are scaled down models from the compact size VP9 and P10C. Let's take a look at this HK. Just all around excellent machining. Very nice. This would make anybody proud and extremely reliable. The longevity of each of these are incredible CZ. Some of the best handguns in today's market are made by CZ. So if I had to choose one, it's not an easy choice, but I do this when I do comparisons. I always put myself in the hot seat and say if I had to choose one, I'm just going to be quick about this. I'm taking the P10S. I just love that trigger and that additional two rounds makes a difference to me. This is phenomenal. I think each of them would make a great choice. If you like videos like this, please subscribe and share. I always appreciate thumbs up button. Thanks for watching and you guys be safe.


Ladies and gentlemen, it is going down. What's going on guys? My name is Jack the Buster. I should know be welcome back to a one-piece watch through today We have episode 25 and 26 now last episode We actually got to see me Hawk my Hawk and it would be an understatement if I said I loved his character He saw a lot of passion and resolve in Zorro and said I will keep this seat here for you when you want to become the greatest swordsman because he found a lot of respect in his resolve and now that he's leaving I guess It's gonna be an all-out war between the sea restaurant and Don Krieg's crew We're gonna hop right into it, but if you need a channel drop a sub hit that big wood bell So I'm gonna see future episodes if I like on this one. Let's just hop right into it Dang son He'll earn his freedom one way or another He doesn't even want him here The little step forward He knows what he wants. I don't think everyone has that goal He's an old man Okay, dude, you got rolled by one dude on the grand line Huh showed the marine flag. What is this dude's hair?  They're after the intel I highly doubt it It's battle time, baby I mean patty's gonna defend his ship one way or another Oh my what do you mean? This is your life Sanji has to pop off, right? Oh dang That was quite the tease for what he's been through again. We know he's been through something In terms of like getting close to starvation, I would assume It's Sanji also cares about it quite a bit. He just might not admit it It's go time, baby. I love how me hawk just fought Zoro and then just dip straight up Movie's not wasting any time not wasting a seagull second giant site Sure boy He's like I don't want to go anywhere near that. Ah, he sees the uh Ah he sees there's something special about uh luffy true shameless Huh, he does have that info I love luffy's smile, bro His smile what is happening like a second part of the ship. Oh my oh shoot.  Oh heck. Yeah, just made themselves a little battlefield, baby That's why he said not to fight in the restaurant. I see Let's go He's gotta appreciate that because I want to steal it I love how they just use silverware and giant versions of silverware to fight What else they got Oh my goodness I wonder if we're even going to check in on usa with them going after nami Oh, wow. I actually did more than I was expecting against a giant cannon, but we're kind of just chilling in the water anyways My man, this is just going for it. Patty. Don't care, bro As it stands, I mean don kreeg still seems a bit outmatched here against everyone unless Dude, his armor is just insane Dude You've trapped yourselves He is strong. Oh my Dude, why would he do that? He doesn't want to destroy the restaurant I'm sorry. What is sanji gonna do? Oh, uh wait So sanji like kicks and stuff. That's what zeff was known for was using his his feet only Oh, whatever he's picked up on things working for him all this time. I feel like it makes sense Dude, that thing is enormous That technique. Yeah, we're gonna do it from him. I'm assuming Hey, you saved the boat Uh, the captain's hat was going through the door frame It's showtime, baby time to perform Oh, they got rolled. Oh, no, that is embarrassing. I mean there's chefs fighting as pirates Oh the disrespect Maybe they just call themselves cooks Okay, so they are fighters too. They're part of don kreeg's crew. Yeah, but according to miyag, east blue is the weakest region I feel like his word means quite a bit Let's go, baby don kreeg hasn't even stepped over there yet.  What is he using? Hello Does he have devil for devil for powers too? He's flicking the air Pearl son My man's just been chilling in the back Pearl surprise. Does he flick pearls?  I love how luffy is still just chilling here That's why he's holding on to it even knocked out.  I think it's impressive anything if anything hands are the most important to cooks. I like that. He needs his hands He's just boy. Not a single drop of blood, huh? I mean a lot of him is low. He kind of exposed And a gentleman Oh is luffy gonna fight don kreeg. Oh my goodness Unless oh didn't hit him or hurt him Oh Dude pearl son is like what is that?   Okay, luffy. Oh, yeah, luffy can't like jump in the ocean or anything That's sanji's life, but if sanji does join the crew, I feel like it's gonna be so hard for him to leave the restaurant. He loves it Even his legs can't cut through it, baby Yeah, for real. That's a bold move. Anyways This is not wrong What is he gonna do? Oh actually knocked him down.  Yeah Oh, no, he's gonna take the hit for the restaurant Unless He's just cracked. Hey, that's zaff, baby He wasn't a fighter with his feet for nothing He's like bring on dawn already a divine technique.  Is he getting kicked away? Sure boy. Hell yeah, luffy. Let's go, baby Sanji is starting to see that luffy is built different too so over it Is don gonna join now I wanted to fight fight Dude you you literally saw how evil don was and he seemed genuine at a heart this pirate did No, I just want to see don fight. Is that so wrong? Well, that was the fastest recap I've ever seen on the show. We're right back to it Why You seemed like a good guy, man Yeah, he's already shown that he wouldn't even think about it I feel like he's gonna kick him from behind Oh See he he does like have sort of a bond with Sanji now. Oh, he's up Okay, bra son.  Oh, maybe not.  So he didn't just train him. Oh god He all blew we're getting a lot of like random lore here and there. Let's I feel like it's slowly gonna piece together Ah, here we go. We're learning a lot more about young sanji So he's always had that little swirl He all blew is a C East blue west with north blue south blue I see Okay, so it's like a crossover. See where you can find anything of all four You know a little sanji's smile Oh, so it's not confirmed He's always believed A lot of food go to waste Very true Did he get mad about uh, what's his name wasting food?  He'll kick them and they just die So even they looked for it. It seems Again zeff sanji said he took it from zeff. He took like everything from like zeff lost it because of him He's thinking But crashed I think Oh, he's Wait What is he going to save him? Oh, he is Dang, oh, so he goes to save him and gets lost at sea with him Ha, yeah, why would he do it for him? He did take a liking to him really quickly and even to this day sanji blames himself even though zeff attacked their ship Dang Oh, and that's how he lost his leg Oh my gosh He gave it. Wait, how did he?  I mean we already knew that but that's how he lost his leg Oh my goodness, but why does sanji still blame himself? I said he was a child and zeff attacked their ship I love me some thick backstory So this is where they ended up and i'm guessing they were like almost starved basically That is a really like it's like the worst spot you could have ended up It keeps it real then he's actually giving him food too.   He's just chilling He's just sitting on the other side Never know Smart he said eat normally you should eat like very scarcely. It must have gotten rough man I mean he is the way he is this today for a reason They just waited and watched Oh my gosh Is that 25? Oh Nothing it's an empty void Hey, they say yeah, it doesn't shouldn't go to waste seems hard to picture when you're in that situation, but I figured something along these lines happened based off his interactions us thus far He's a child dude.  Oh man. Just countless days. He must have been on the brink. He's so skinny Oh my god That is horrendous He said won't see each other till we know wait. He can't he can't even walk. He's just dragging himself Has he even eaten any food That's like how much he started with how will you let him have any?  He's just straight up about it. Unless it's not even a food What It's money What has he not eaten No Wait, what? Is he prioritized money over food?  Give up his life as a pirate for him Maybe he just felt responsible for what happened Oh Find the seat. Oh, I see and everybody laughed at him his crew laughed at him Dang dude He passed it on to him. That's why he learned how to kick like that. They must have found the ship like right now They had to have Oh my gosh And that's how it happened dang dude No wonder he has this intense connection to the restaurant It makes sense. I see the relationship completely differently now. I wonder who it was that found them They use every last ounce of his energy He's on the brink and clearly they saved them I Guess they both feel responsible responsible in a way for each other makes sense Dang gotta fight Luffy seeing his result resolve Just all burning Oh Luffy's mad Oh my The Luffy's leg Goodness Okay, dude, that is that is pretty clever. I'll give it to him. What was that called gum gum battle axe. That is beautiful Well, we got quite the sanji backstory learned exactly what happened with him and zeff and like I said I figured it was something along those lines of that sort of backstory But that would make sense how he feels responsible for him and vice versa because you know zeff had this entire Pirate's life, but the last second realized what sanji's goal was And what his dream was and how similar it was to his and whenever his entire crew laughed I'm guessing he felt that one singular connection to sanji and realized it wasn't even worsted to have his crew And was like this kid can basically pass on my dream But now we have that backstory to give us more passion behind every single fight that happens here on out And I love that because that has been it for episode 25 and 26 of our one piece reaction series That has been like a very big setup for this entire battle Don creek hasn't even come into the mix yet pretty much and at this point I'm guessing it's only a matter of time be sure to drop a comment down below And tell you the episode we thought my reaction is always I hope you guys have a wonderful rest of your day as per usual Like I'll see you in the next one space


So let's consider, suppose we have a polynomial that factors as a product. Now if we expand this out, we get, and the thing that's worth noticing here is that the product of the coefficient of x squared and the constant will be pr times qs. And we'll rearrange this a little bit, that's ps times qr. And notice the x coefficients will be ps plus qr. And this suggests we could factor if we can find two numbers, ps and qr, where their product is the product of the constant and the coefficient of x squared, and their sum is a linear coefficient. And so we might put it this way, to factor ax squared plus bx plus c, find two numbers m and n, where m times n is ac, the product of the square and constant coefficients, and their sum is equal to b, the coefficient of the linear term. And then we'll rewrite bx as mx plus nx, then factor by grouping. So let's try to factor 3x squared plus 13x minus 10. So to factor something like this, we want to look for two numbers, m and n, where the product is equal to the product of the coefficient of x squared and the constant, and the sum is equal to the coefficient of x. So we want to find two numbers that multiply to 3 times minus 10, negative 30, and add to 13. Now as a general rule, the numbers that multiply to a given value are much more limited than the numbers that add to a given value. So let's find numbers that multiply to minus 30. Well, that's quite a few numbers, and so you might wonder which one's the right one. And here's the important thing to remember. The only way to determine if something is a factor is to check it. We don't know in advance which one of these will work. We have to check all of them until we find something that does, or determine that nothing works. Now remember, we're actually looking for two numbers that multiply to minus 30 and add to 13. So any of these multiply to minus 30, and so we look for a pair that adds to 13. So we could try our first pair, 1 and negative 30, and see if it adds to 13. Nope. We'll take a look at another pair, 2 and negative 15. Nope. However, because this adds to minus 13 and we want 13, this suggests that the negative of these two numbers, minus 2 and 15, will work. We check it out, and it does add to 13. So now we can rewrite our expression as 3x squared, 13x. Well, the reason this works is we can write 13 as minus 2 plus 15. So this 13x can be rewritten as minus 2x plus 15x. And now we're in a position to factor by grouping. So let's group our first two terms and our last two terms. Now our first two terms have a common factor of x, so we'll factor that out and get our second pair of terms has a common factor of 5, so we can remove that and factor as. And now both terms have a factor of 3x minus 2, so we'll remove that common factor, leaving us with x plus 5 times 3x minus 2. So let's try to factor something much more horrifying. So a useful idea to remember is to remove any common factors first. And if we look, we see that we can remove a common factor of 5. So let's factor that 5 out. So now to factor ax squared plus bx plus c, we want to find two numbers m and n where their product is a times c and their sum is b. And so we want to find two numbers that multiply to 12 times minus 12, negative 144, and add to minus 7 the coefficient of x. Again, there are fewer numbers that multiply to something than add to something, so let's find numbers that multiply to minus 144. And so our possibilities are, and of course it's obvious that the right one is, um, well, remember the only way to determine which one works is to try them out. Now if you're clever about this and think about it a little bit, you can go through this table of values efficiently. But I don't want to be clever. I want to go through this table of values one by one. So we'll try 1 and negative 144. We know they multiply to minus 144, and so the only question is do they add to minus 7? How about our next pair, 2 and negative 72? 3 and minus 48? Nope. 4 and negative 36? 6 and negative 24? 8 and negative 18? 9 and negative 16? Nope. Wait. No, that's right. So that means we should rewrite this minus 7x as 9x plus negative 16x. Actually to make the formatting a little bit easier, we'll rewrite that as minus 16x plus 9x. Everything else is still there. So we'll group the first two and the last two, and we'll look for a common factor in our first two terms. The common factor will be 4x, so we'll factor the first two terms. We can also factor our last two terms, and to now both of our terms have a 3x minus 4, so we'll factor out the 3x minus 4 to get our final factorization.