ח absolve my talk will be devoted to the notion of hypercalicorns in general and then I will move to discuss brains and to describe the work of two mathematicians from the 70s about the descriptions of a particular class of hypercalicorns. מה היפרקל קורסים, הם נראה שבאים עם 8 סופרצגיות, ובאותו על היגס פרנצ'ה, וזה היגס פרנצ'ה יכולה להיות קלאסיקל, או זה יכולה להיות גם של איזשהו אינטראקטים, ובאותו על 3D, ובאותו על 60, ויש לי סטנדרת כתובילים, נראה שזה היפרקל הקורסים, או כלומר, הם היפרקל קורסים, וזה היו הרבה כדאי זכרים, ואני לא רוצה להתתכף, They also show up in, again, theories with eight supercharges on Coulomb branches, and in this case, it's going to be just in three dimensions, so three dimensional n equals four, and you may have seen that there has been some excitement about it, in particular in algebraic geometry in the work of Nakajima. Now, Coulomb branches are quantum-modelized spaces. As usual, Coulomb branches receive quantum corrections, and you have to take into account all of these monopole operators which show up, and I consider this as a different construction. There is the hyperkeler quotient, and there is the other construction of Coulomb branch, and if you have a CFT, then perhaps you could construct it using some gluing techniques, but that's also under hyperkeler quotient. Today, what I'm going to do is to look at this class of all hyperkeler cones, so I'm going to concentrate on this hyperkeler cone and see what we can say about them in the most general way, and we will start with the geometry, or perhaps a more algebraic description. Since it's hyperkeler, there's always an SU2, and we will denote it by SU2R. It acts on a triplet of complex structures which transform in the adjoint representation of this SU2. And what we are going to do, the approach we will take is that we will pick a U1 subgroup of this SU2, and with respect to this subgroup, pick a single complex structure and define the notion of holomorphic functions. So physically that means that I pick a subalgebra of four supercharges, and it has a U1R symmetry, the subgroup of SU2, and I'm going to think about holomorphic functions with respect to this particular U1 symmetry. And so all of these holomorphic functions are now going to transform in irreducible representations of SU2R, and not just in irreducible representations, they are actually going to be the highest weights, the corresponding representations. So in general, if you'll have a collection of operators which are transforming in a given SU2R representation, the top component will be holomorphic or will be chiral physically, but the lower components will not be holomorphic anymore. So if we restrict to holomorphic functions, we'll just get the highest weights. So the degree of the holomorphic function is going to correspond to the spin under SU2R. Okay, so let's use this data, and now think about all possible holomorphic functions. We're going to have a chiral ring, or the ring of holomorphic functions, and it's going to be finitely generated. So we will take the generators, GI, to be in certain representations of SU2R, and we are going to look at the possible representations we can get. So what could those representations be? Let's be incremental and look at simplest possible representations. So if the representation is the spin zero, the trivial representation, then there's only one operator, and actually it's not even a generator, it's just the identity operator. And every quantum filter will have precisely one such thing, and you could say that if the spin is zero, its identity is spin zero. So that's fine. Now take the next representation, if the representation is one-half, then physically it corresponds to a free field, chiral multiplet, and in fact when we have some generators of the chiral ring which have spin one-half, there will always be an even number of them. Let's call the number of such generators to N, and then I will know that the quantum filter will have a decoupled sector of a collection of two N-free chiral multiplets or N-free hypers. The corresponding hypercalacone will contain a factor of C2 to the power N, or sometimes it is noted as the quaternionic flat space H to the N, and this will be a factor and there will be another factor which is non-trial generated by operators of spin higher than one-half. So let's concentrate on those which have R equal to 1 and above. Let's move to R equals 1. What happens there? By supersymmetry, the generators transform in their joint representation some global symmetry. Geometrically, this symmetry is going to be the isometry of the hypercalacone. Physically, it's going to be the global symmetry which acts on all other operators and they transform in representations of this global symmetry. Now, this is a very important crucial point because, in fact, people in this room and not here have used this to say the following. If for some reason I know to identify the global symmetry of a quantum system, then that means that I should look at operators of spin one and I know that they should transform in the joint representation of this global symmetry. So I have to account for all of them. And conversely, if I have any means to identify all operators at spin one, then they will have to transform in a joint representation of some group and this will allow me to identify which particular global symmetry the physical system has. So this is a very crucial tool which has been used, I would say, as we speak, in various quantum systems. So this is very important. But now here's a punchline that I suspect that not too many people know and it's the following. Suppose the generators of the chiral ring are in spin one representation, then this implies that the cone, so what I mean by this is that no other generators are in higher spin. So we took care of this, we took care of one-half this, the coupled, suppose that what I'm left with has only spin one and not more, then the modular space, the hyperkeler cone is an ill-potent orbit. So this puts an ill-potent orbit into a very special position, very special place just tells us that if we want to understand the physics of modular spaces of certain supersymmetric gauge theories or certain brain systems, then we first need to understand the physics of spin one operators and, or in other words, the physics of ill-potent orbits. So the rest of my talk is going to be devoted to ill-potent orbits and the nice thing about ill-potent orbits is that it's been classified for us by embeddings, the group SU2, whatever your global symmetry is, G. G here is the global symmetry that I talked about over here. What is an ill-potent orbit? It's just simply you take an ill-potent element in the algebra and take the orbit under their joint action. And nicely enough, those spaces form a hyperkeler space. The space of all such orbits for a single element is a hyperkeler. In fact, there is a subtle point here. I'm going to take a closure of an ill-potent orbit, and this is important since whenever I have an ill-potent element, I can describe it, but if my group has matrix presentations, then I can describe the ill-potent element, let's say for A type, by some collection of Jordan blocks, and when I conjugate by the adjoint, this matrix has a certain rank and certain degree of ill-potency. A joint conjugation is not going to change, not the rank condition and not the ill-potency. For this reason, I need closures. So if I take closures, I can allow for those elements to be zero, and once I set one of the elements to zero, I can reduce the rank, reduce the degree of ill-potency, and I'll get a cone. So the closure of an ill-potent orbit is a cone, is a hyperkeler cone of the type that we are interested in supersymmetric gauge theories and in-brain systems. Any questions so far? Yes, it's a singular space. So this goes under the name of a symplectic resolution, and there are some ways to do that. So for example, if you take for an ill-potent orbit of type A, the symplectic resolution, so in the math literature it's called a springer resolution, and in fact it's just a cotangent bundle of some cosets. And given the type of ill-potent orbit, there is a simple way of computing the subgroup H, and this is the desingularization of this object. We will be mostly interested in the cone, in the non-singular case, and in fact it turns out that not all orbits have a symplectic resolution. So in fact that makes it quite interesting. Yes. So if we know, soon I will show certain constructions and I will show how we can identify the global symmetry on either Higgs branches or on Coulomb branches. And typically to identify the global symmetry, you need a little bit of physical either intuition or physics arguments to identify this.  More questions? So let's take the case where G is of type A, and here the classification of ill-potent orbits is just embeddings of SU2 into SUN, and this goes back to the work of Dinkin. It's just a parameterized by partitions of N, and let me just give you an example. Take N equals to 2, so that's embedding of SU2 into itself. There are two types of partitions, two and one squared, and one squared is the trivial partition. The corresponding orbit is just going to be a point in the origin, but the second one is non-trivial. I'll just think about the space of all 2x2 matrices, which have zero trace, and that squares to zero. A quick computation shows that this space is C2 mod Z2, and this is the closure of the orbit 2, this non-trivial orbit over here. Okay? Any questions? Yes, yes. I don't know of the Schmitt new-potent. Well, I mean, this is just how a period is degenerate. Yes. I will be very interested to learn about this. I'm not aware of this, so I'm not sure I can comment now. But can you replace G with the y-room? I need a continuous space. I'm not sure what you mean by replacing. You see here, this space is a two-dimensional space. You'll have to pick your elements very carefully. You'll need to pick three elements and then act on them discretely. Sorry, two. Not sure, but let's try to clarify this. So this leads us to the work of Kraft and Pochessi, which this goes back to the 70s, late 70s, where what they said is that wait, we can construct a quiver. Actually, they didn't call it a quiver because back then the notion of quiver was not introduced yet. However, they did quivers before quivers were called like that. And what they said is that suppose that I take a partition. So let's characterize it by a young diagram. I can construct a quiver by taking, denoting each column, let's call it Ci. So it will be ranked from one until the number of columns. And Ci is going to be the number of boxes in the column. And what they said, they construct the quiver. The quiver will have as many nodes as the number of columns. And each node will have number n and i and 1 and 2 and so on. And those n i's are just the sum i from, let's call it j from 1 to i Cj. So conveniently, they told us how to construct a quiver. So let's do a simple example for the case of n equals to 4. I will have the maximal partition 4. And that will correspond to a quiver which looks like 1, 2, 3 and 4. The corresponding young diagram is this. And so you see that the first column has one box, the next 2 will have 2, the next 3 will have 3, and the last will have a 4. So they told us how to construct a quiver. 3, 1 will be this partition. And the quiver is going to look like 2, 2, 1 node, 1 flavor. And 2 and 1, the quiver looks like 1 and 4. And the partition is this. And then there is the trivial. And what they also told us is that if I take the hex branch of this quiver, is the closure, the corresponding cone, sorry, nilpotent orbit. So they gave us a prescription how to construct quivers. And I will deal in this talk just with A-type for simplicity, even though other types of nilpotent orbits, including exceptionals, are extremely interesting. And there's plenty of physics one can extract from those guys. Questions? Now that we have a hex-punch quiver, by this I mean a quiver such that the hex-punch is a nilpotent orbit, we can apply a three-dimensional mirror symmetry, which is easy. What you need to do is to embed this system into brains. So here's an example. 1, 2, 3, and 4. Like that, the lines are NS brains. These lines are the three brains, and these are the five brains. So now it's the first time I mention brains.  You do this, and what you do is you move the brains such that they realign and they are in between the five brains. So when you do that, you need to make sure that you don't have configurations which break supersymmetry, and you need to account for the right number of brains, you have brain creations, but when the dust settles, you end up with a picture which looks like this, and except that now these are d5, these are d3, and these are NS. So it's kind of a dual picture, and note that the only difference for this particular quiver is that the picture is mirrored, perhaps to reflect this point. But that's not common, actually. It only happens for the maximum net potent orbit. So you end up with a picture like this, and when you do S-duality, you can now replace d5 by NS, NS by d5, the three remains, and you get the mirror quiver, and you will say that the Coulomb branch of this mirror quiver is the corresponding net potent orbit. So I'll give you a prescription how to compute it, given a partition. So draw an A-type quiver, which is framed, that's the math, a word, or a flavor. The flavor is determined by the partition, and also this is not just framed, it's also balanced. So let's do examples. How do I determine the flavor according to partitions? I just draw the diagram, and I give the nodes labels. I give them labels 1, 2, and 3, and in order to distinguish from those labels, I'll just circle them like that. We could use different colors, but we don't have the time for that. So these are just labels, 1, 2, and 3, and if I have a partition, so let's take this partition here, I just count the number of columns which have one box, and there are four of them, and so that tells me that the flavor is going to be four types of the partition 1, and the rest of the quiver is determined by balancing. Balancing means that every node has a number of flavors equal to twice the number of columns. So then the answer will be 3 here, 2, and 1. So we see that we get this quiver. So quickly I will draw the mirrors for this case, maybe I'll do it over here.  So this is self-mirror. This one, again, I draw an A-type dinking diagram. I have one flavor of 2 and 2 of 1, and the balancing is that 1, 2, 2. Over here I'll have a dinking diagram of type A for SU4, so that's A3. I have two flavors of 2 here, and the balancing gives me 1, 2, 1. And finally, the last node, 1, 1, 1, and one flavor here, one flavor here, as the diagram tells me. And we can read from this the dimension of the Coulomb branch. It's just the rank, so the quaternion dimension of the Coulomb branch will be given by just summing those numbers, 6, 5, 4, 3, and there will be the trivial quiver where we have zeros, and here you have a trivial quiver, just a point which has dimension 0. This is the list of nilpotentobits of SU4. Any questions? Craft and Pochessi, for sure, have a look at the paper. They knew it before many other people thought about hypercalic questions. I asked Martin about it, he wasn't aware of the work, but we still need to know whether Hitchin was aware or not. Any other questions? Okay, now, of course, Craft and Pochessi did not think about the Coulomb branch, so for them, this type of quivers did not exist. These quivers certainly show up in their work. Here we have a hypercalic question. Here to determine the Coulomb branch, I need to understand the physics of monopole operators and the way they form relations. I figure this out, and then I should find מולדלי-ספאס, זה קלוזר קורספון נילפוטנטוביט. Sorry. So that's nice. The next thing that we want to do is to try and understand all of these spaces as a general thing, and that leads us to the title of the talk, The Craft and Pochessi Transition. Here, Craft and Pochessi use an idea בריסקון, אני חושב שזה קלוזר קורספון נילפוטנטוביט. קלוזר קורספון נילפוט. So a leading German algebraic geometry. Here the work is done in the early 70s, maybe 71 or something. And he says that, if I want to understand these spaces, then perhaps I should understand differences between them. And he looks at the maximal cone, the one which is six-dimensional, and he compares it with the one below it, which is five-dimensional. In fact, all cones are contained in the maximal one, that's a theorem, and then he says, okay, what's the difference between these two? Can we understand the difference? And by this, when we understand the difference, we understand the structure of these spaces. And he comes up with the feature, and here you see that the difference is one-dimensional, one complex dimension, and in one complex dimension hyperkeler, we have a classification. So it could be one of C2-mode gamma, where gamma is classified by ADE. And so it's very suggestive that for the case of SU4, the difference will be A3. So it's C2-mode Z4. And indeed, that's what it shows. So the difference here between the top nil-potent orbit and the one next to it is C2-mode Z4. And I will show you how we can understand this using brains, because after all, we want to extract the physics from this geometry. And so Craphen-Pochese say, okay, why should we stop and compute the difference between the first two, the highest two? Let's move on and continue to compute differences for all orbits. And that's what they do in their work in the late 70s. And you see that the differences here are one, one, one, and three. So maybe we could figure out what are the differences in this case, but in the last case, that's a question. What do you mean by that? So you look at the cone and you look, so this orbit is contained in the closure of this one. And so what you do is you look at the transfer slice to this. So in a sense, let's say this is the closure and here's the orbit. So you just look at the transverse directions and it turns out that this is simple enough. And in fact, using brains, we will see how simple it looks. And I will use this picture here. And what I'll do is to consider the Higgs mechanism. And by the Higgs mechanism, I'm going to look at this picture here and just look at one brain and consider the rest as spectators. So transfer slicing here means that I just ignore those other five and I just look at one of them. And I see that if this one touches the other four, let's draw it in this way. Let's just align them. So what I get, this looks like the quiver of u1 with four flavors, for which we know the Coulomb branch. What's the Coulomb branch? C2 mod Z4. And in fact I'm going to need one more Coulomb branch which will look like this. Suppose that I have a collection of brains, all of them stretched like that, one at the one flavor at one side, one flavor at the other side. So the quiver will look like an analog of this one, the minimal orbit. And the Coulomb branch has as many dimensions as the number of free brain segments. In this specific example, we are dealing with A5, so A, so the number of brains here is five, that's Su5 corresponding to A4. And the Coulomb branch of this quiver is the minimal nilpotent orbit A4 Su5. פיזically it's known as the reduced one instant on molar space of Su5. And in this space, Kraft and Pochese denote by A4, we'll use this notation. And it turns out that this is what we need. Let's now look at the Higgs mechanism. So suppose that I get to this case, Coulomb branch of u1 with four flavors. At this point, there are additional muscle states. There are singularities in the molar space. If I think about string states between those brains, they become muscle states. And I turn into an origin, a local origin of a Higgs branch and a Coulomb branch, right? So both vector fields and hypermultiplets are massless in this case. And I can do something different. I can just split the brains like that. If I'll draw it in three dimensions, it would look like this. There's a brain and I just split it. I pull it along the transverse direction, right? I cannot do it when they are away, certainly because they don't touch, but as they touch, I can pull it back and I'll get a new branch. And that's the Higgs mechanism. That's nothing but the Higgs mechanism quantum filtering.  So this is the Higgs mechanism using brains in this particular brain system. And so suppose that I take this vacuum expectation value and I send it to infinity. I just cut this and pull it and the remaining picture, let's take this. I started with four and let's just take these two as spectators and there is a brain, which is moved far away and now I can use a brain creation effect and just move those two to the other side. This brain gets annihilated. That's the inverse of brain creation. So you could think about this as coming to this by just moving it to the two sides. And so the bottom line from what I started is that I started with a configuration with four brains over here and six brains like that. That's the starting point. And then what I do, this number here is reduced by two and I have one brain here, one brain here and one less brain here. So I end up with this system all the others which are spectators remain. This reduces by two so I'm left with two, those are these two and one brain moves here, one brain moves here. This brain does not contribute to the flavors anymore and I'm still left with an A3 type quiver and this is what I get. So this is u1, u2, u2, one flavor, two flavors. u1, u2, u2, one, two flavors. So we got into this Kraft-Protcherzi transition in terms of young diagrams, what we did and this is also the way Kraft and Pocherzi describe it. They start from this partition and they move to this partition. They just pull the books one down. Any questions? So now we could turn it into some simple computation. I'll start describing this by so-called Hasse diagram. The first point is going to represent the maximal orbit of dimension six. Then I do an A3 transition, namely I do this transition with C2 mod Z4. Next, I'll do an A1 transition to the four-dimensional orbit and as you could see, I can proceed by taking one brain and pulling this brain here and this brain here and I'll get this quiver. A1 transition will continue to the three-dimensional, the difference here will be again an A1 transition and finally, the difference between the three-dimensional and the zero-dimensional is this particular orbit which corresponds to the minimal orbit of A3. You can look at this diagram. This Hasse diagram turns out to be symmetric, right? With respect, there is a Z2 symmetry that exchanges A with capital A, lowercase A with capital case A. This is also equal to A1 and it's a nice symmetry for nearly potential orbits. Any questions? So let me finish by describing the K-P transitions for A5, SU6 and we will see that the Hasse diagram gets an interesting shape. My starting point will be the maximal orbit. I draw six brains like that and this is going to be the Coulomb branch. One, two, three, four, five and six brains over here. This is a complete analog of the case for A3 and I'll do the Kraft-Protchesi transition. I'll get from this quiver, I'll get to the quiver which looks like this. Again, it's an A5 quiver diagram. There will be one flavor here and four flavors here and the transition is maybe I'll do it over here. Here's the orbit, the sum of lengths is 15 and the transition to the 14-dimensional is of type A5. I'll proceed and use the rules that I depicted over here. This is one, two, three, four and four and now I'll get two here, three, four, three, two, one. This is 13-dimensional and the transition is of type A3 because a single brain was touching four D5 brains. However, note here that I have two options. I could do a transition on this segment or I can do a transition on this segment. The corresponding Haas diagram will have a bifocation. There will be two 12-dimensional orbits corresponding to two different partitions. I can draw the partitions. Here the partition will be the six partition. Here I'll just move one box down and like that and over here I'll remove one more box down and now I have two options. I can either remove this box down here or I can remove this box down here. I'll get two types of orbits with a transition being A1 because the three brain heats two brains in each case. C2 mod Z2. I'll proceed and it will turn out that both orbits reduce to a single one with another A1 singularity. Let's draw the corresponding quiver. Let's say that we move these two guys and so we will get the A5 dinking diagram and I reduce this by one. These remain and the brains move. Here I'll have nothing. Here I'll have a three and here I'll have a one. This corresponds to the dinking diagram which looks like three columns of one and one column of three. In fact, you see that this is going down in one of these guys but when I go further it's not going to be A1. I made a mistake here. It's going to be an A2 because now when the brain heats and because of this Z2 symmetry I can conclude but you could just proceed with the kaf-Pochese transition and you'll get this nice symmetric quiver where here the transition will be A2. This will be nine. Nine-dimensional. Here the transition will be A1. Eight-dimensional. Here the transition will be A3. The difference is three. Five. This one will be A5. The difference is five. Here's the structure of nilpotent orbits and also here is the brain system and how it reflects this transition that kaf-Pochese computed back in the late 70s. So now I'm ready to summarize. What we've seen is that first of all we started the lecture by characterizing hyperkeler cones and by saying that they are classified according to the spin of the generators of the chiral ring and this is something which is new. Something that I haven't seen that is emphasized in talks in physics so far and I think we should start thinking about it in a serious way. So hyperkeler cones are classified according to the spin of the operators, the generators of the chiral ring and spin one under SU2R is very important because they always transform a joint representation of the flavor symmetry and in fact now I remember a question that you asked in fact we see the flavor symmetry in the Dinkin diagram. These are Dinkin diagrams of type A, this is A3 these are Dinkin diagrams of type A5 they are all balanced so as long as those nodes are balanced the flavor symmetry is going to be given by the Dinkin diagram of all balanced nodes so indeed if I compute the Coulomb branch of these even though it's not visible I will always get that the flavor symmetry is SU6 in this case SU4 in this case on the Coulomb branch. So classically there is nothing which tells you that there is an SU4 here or there is an SU6 this is a special case and it's not representing but a computation using monopole operators will show that the global symmetry is always A5, A3 and so on. So back to the summary all generators of the chiral ring have are classified by spin so it makes sense to think about spin one-half, spin one spin three-halves and so on and to remember that if there are no other generators other than spin one the modular space becomes orbit and there we have a classification so we just need to think about all members in the classification and just study them and extract the physics out of each one we have great work to do in this case and we think of all other hypercalacons as built over nilpotent cones or nilpotent orbits why is that? because if I'll add one more generator which has spin higher than one it's going to be a deformation a small deformation of a certain nilpotent orbit so I should study some sense of perturbative extensions of nilpotent orbits just add one more operator two more in fact in Higgs punch monolite spaces these are always so I just need to add few barons over a collection of mesons the mesons will form the nilpotent orbit and the barons will just be slight extensions of those nilpotent orbits so it's a new way of thinking about hypercalacons and finally we saw that in the subclass of nilpotent orbits type A is what we discussed today we can have a physical description of the Kraft-Pochese transition where a single brain touches the collection of heavy brains and moves away by the Higgs mechanism leaving us with the rest and this is the physical notion of what Briskorn and Kraft-Pochese suggested by transfer slicing so we have this physical interpretation of transfer slicing all of these guys don't are spectators and only one brain is participating in this transition so we have lots of fun with this transition and I hope to report on some other things thank you


Hey traders, this is Tosh I go by T Bradley 90 in the my investing club chat a general reminder for those who do not know MIC is having a one-year anniversary event where bow is going to be trading live in front of our members It's coming up August 17th mark your calendars as an added benefit for our members The event is 100% and exclusively free for annual and lifetime members While lifetime on top of that get extra coaching before the event and guaranteed front-row seating While most charged for these events We show our support by making it again free for annual and lifetime members if you are interested in signing up for this event DM T Bradley 90 in M. I see slack chat and or email myself at Tosh at my invest in club comm now today We have a very special video for you guys as it is June 25th 2019 and it is time for another bow daily recap today bow talks about how to top tick and Also the category of low-hanging fruit the ticker symbols included today are fun ph un xb. I o GBTC nerve NERV and VV PR This is also categorized in the trading fish Academy 2 episode 4 and While today is just a preview of the full length almost one and a half hour video If you want to watch the full length video or any of our exclusive content to become an MIC member All right guys, welcome to this day the recap. This is June 25th 2019 It's been a while since we did one of these so and the reason why is I don't do these every week is because Whenever I do one of these it's the same process guys. It's the same exact process only differences The type of stock so if you've been watching the daily recap since the beginning leading into the trading fish You'll notice it's the same process. I go through the same exact process for each one of these stocks that I trade and so You watch these you learn the process you learn how we figure I figure out the lines how I do my entries how I scale and then the rest of The time is screen time is experienced through screen time. You just there's no Way around it. You have to keep watching these stocks. You have to keep replaying these Setups in your mind.  Okay. I mental trade every day Like I'll give you example IGC IGC right here, dude. I man, I Screwed that up. I I waited. I didn't I thought 250 was coming It didn't come and then it just tanked you that it didn't chase. I thought I was gonna bounce back up through a zombie I'll know it kept on tanking So these are the type of screen time that you put in so the more times you look at these type of stocks The more experience you get The process is going to be the same sometimes Sometimes it works Sometimes it doesn't the key always is I keep telling people is the process is discipline and risk management Okay, I Missed IGC I'm very upset. I miss this is the big trade. I waited for this trade For a few days. I saw this IGC last week. I did not get in there long But I waited many days for this and I missed it. I pissed off, but you know what man? I maintain my discipline Missing it is better than losing So it may have kept on tanking today So I didn't chase But I'm looking at this like I should change that should change but the next time You know what man? It could have saved at two bucks rip right back up. Who knows? So the only thing I could do is maintain my process if I miss I'd miss Okay, that's a very important thing for a trader. I Saved this man. The hardest thing about trading guys The all the hardest thing about trading is not trading And we repeat that the hardest thing about trading is not trading is being able just to sit around and wait for your Setups wait for the stock to come to the areas you want so what I usually like to do is this I I Do a lot of fantasy orders. I call that fancy orders is basically okay before I even enter the stock Where would I like, you know in a perfect scenario? Where would I like the stock to be? Where would I like to my entries to be that's that's called a fantasy order? I call that fantasy order because dude before you get into the stock. That is the area that you want Because why would before you in this talk, you have you are emotionless. You're not in the stock You know, you have nothing to lose. So, you know that that time in my opinion is the best time to do your planning It's not when you're in the stock Because when you're in the stock, you know, you're going crazy your emotions are running you're greedy You're fearful, but when you're not in the stock is the best time for you to make a rational decision a motionless Decision without emotion So during that time guys plan your trade and when I talk about planning a trade There's a couple of things you need to do a few things plan the trade is not just mean where you're gonna enter It also means where you're gonna add So if you have a scaling plan you need to scale that you need to write that down where you get it You know, I've been doing this a long time. I don't write it down But you know for for yourself if you want to keep a notepad and write that down So I always plan around this so we talked about this thing in in in chat about range figure out how How range is that stock is is this a 20 cent range is the dollar range 50 cent rate so based upon that You know how to scale properly You don't just load up in one spot because if this sucker ranges 50 cents to a dollar You're screwed Every I mean, you know saying so small the wider the range of the stock the smaller the size You should be scaling in at each entry Okay, we repeat that the wider the range you mean the bigger the range The smaller your entries should be because you know what money you have to give it room for it to work You can't be sizing up on a stock that's ranging up and down 50 cents You know even a few thousand shares are 50 cents, you know could could stop you out So you so I base everything around risk. I Want to see okay How much am I willing to risk or lose on this stock based upon that if you're out the range And then I place my orders accordingly and the size of one a lot of these stocks barely just hit I mean I have fancy orders at the lines.  So that's the problem guys. So as a beginning trader, you're like, I don't want to miss a trade I want to miss a trade. I'm gonna get in that trade. You know what's gonna happen man That stocks keep going up 50 cents more and you're screwed You wanted to get into trade so badly That you pretty much Through your rational sense out of the window and you just being emotional and so yeah now you're in the stock Of course, you're in the stock but now you're down 50 cents So what I like to do is do a fancy order Where would you really like to get in the trade without FOMO and that's where your entries should be That's my opinion. That's how I do it. And that's how I'm able to top take all of these stocks The hardest part like I said the hardest part of trading is not trading It's just waiting dude waiting for those waiting for that stock to get to your price You so I'm saying So based upon that, you know, so let's get into this daily recap right now First of all, you guys can hear me very well clearly guys because some guys have audio issues turn it up or restart zoom But I'm making sure the audio is very very loud. Okay, great guys So what I'm gonna do is I want to go through stock by stock first and show you what I did and the process behind So once again guys, I am not the master of everything I do some things very well and I do something Very poorly and this is all relative of course, right? I'm still learning So that's the one thing you gotta keep in your head man. This is my way of trading This is not the bible of trading does not mean this is the best way to trade This just happens to be the way I trade Good or bad. It's up to you by interpretation. That's just me. This is how I trade guys I still have a lot of bad habits for my old days um Because I I've never gotten mentored and so So hopefully the new guys are trading right now. You guys Think about it.  This is actually a good thing, man If you're new to trading This is a very good thing you're doing now. You are starting off Without many bad habits You're learning the proper way to trade. This is in my opinion the proper way to trade. Okay So I have a lot of bad habits fomo and all this stuff, you know what I'm saying so Or scared of you know, just taking trade Taking x's too early stuff like that. So so keep that in mind guys. Keep an open mind always learn The one thing you need to respect all the time is the risk. Okay, respect the risk A lot of the new guys you guys I have a very bad habit. I'd never used hard stock before Uh, but I've been doing this a long time. So thank god.  So place your hard stops that will help you That will save your account. Okay. So before I start this I want to talk about stops.   I even me man. I mean, dude The other week, I mean unless there was a max one of my accounts had a max I didn't even know and I triggered it.   I would probably freaking lose 20,000 So like I said, man, sometimes that that loss is to help you.   You're dead. That that's exactly what trading without A fence trading without stops will happen, man, nine out of 10 times you're flying at one time You're gonna you're gonna run into a bad situation there. Okay, so Hey traders, this is tosh I go by t bradley 90 in the my investing club chat Just wanted to reach out and say if you have any questions about m i c joining m i c, maybe you're a member already You have three ways to contact myself personally and through m i c. You can hit our social media You can hit me through pms in chat or you can contact us through my email at tosh at my investing club.com That's tosh at my investing club.com I will get back to you in a timely manner and I'm saying this because I'm here to help and I don't want Anybody to be afraid to reach out and ask any question that they have we are here for you guys. All right. See you guys


So one of our members recently posted a question the group and asked for my perspective on it, which I'd like to share right now So let me give you some back story. She's in a relationship with a man for about six to seven weeks It appears that he's a great guy in every sense He's monogamous with her. They're exclusively Seeing each other He helped he was very romantic during Valentine's Day, not very romantic, but it was somewhat romantic on Valentine's Day He's an access service kind of guy and she says that He's really perfect except he's not very verbally Expressive or emotionally expressive in the relationship and her question was centered around are they dating or are they in a relationship and how to go about Asking where they were at this relationship stands like in other words, where is this relationship going and She wants some feedback on that. So I thought that would be a great topic to talk about today So most of you know some of my content centered around what I call the users The spenders and the growers the users the spenders and the growers Now users are people who are in it for the short one or for their own benefit In other words the relationship is all on their terms. These are players Love bombers. These are entitled people gold diggers that sort of thing. They're the users. They're using people now the growers and builders are the ones who Actually genuinely want partnership with someone they're Evaluating this person to determine if it makes sense to be in partnership with this person Those are the growers and the builders and yet the vast majority of people are what I call spenders What they are is they they see companionship connection and sex They won't they want to spend time with you for those three things without any real Forethought on commitment and partnership Okay, so why does this happen in midlife? She's a woman in her 60s. He's 55 years old Okay, when you think back in your 20s and 30s the Predominant reason to mate with another person was to get married make babies and raise a family Okay, that was the reason why you you partnered with someone the real challenge for most men and Women is they don't know what partnership looks like When it's maybe their second or third significant relationship given that roughly 75% of singles over 45 years old are divorced We've had one significant relationship and in many cases there's been a divorce and another Significant relationship or some short-term relationships that happen in their lives and what's challenging for most human beings is especially as they are in their second or third chapter of their lives a Really third or fourth chapter in their lives and I'm looking at chapters in 20-year segments Is that they don't know what partnership looks like? Okay, so that being said What can she do in this particular case? What should she say? Well, I think first and foremost I think it'd be important to ask this person in other words pull yourself back from this relationship and ask yourself If he isn't the one do you want to know about it today? Or do you want to know about it when you're even more and more invested in this person? Okay, ask yourself that do you want to know about it today? Because the fear of what I'm about to suggest causes women to hope that something will change okay, so Six seven weeks in I would clearly want to know what does Commitment mean to you and what does commitment look like for you and what type of committed Relationship are you looking for what type of committed relationship? Are you looking for? What does commitment mean to you? What does it look like for you? What type of commitment now? But I mean to say type of commitment. Well monogamy and Exclusivity meaning monogamy is not having sex with other people Exclusivity means not actively seeking to date new people is one form of commitment Okay, another form of commitment is Merging finances together another form of commitment is living together another form of commitment is getting married together Another form of commitment is true teamwork with one another and just because he put up Some gift that you gave him on his wall Isn't necessarily teamwork. What is real teamwork as we get into that for those of us that are in our late 40s 50s or even 60s. What does teamwork look like in? In my particular case with my beloved it was teamwork meant we we moved in together. We share expenses together That's a level of teamwork. She helps out in my professional capacity. She helps me shoot videos We I help her with her family. I help her with the health issues. These are levels of teamwork beyond the surface Now Did we know this in six or seven weeks? You know actually in our case. Yeah, we knew very quickly that we wanted to explore a relationship That was partnership oriented that we were going to grow together We actually didn't really begin the relationship without that agreement going in So now you're six or seven weeks in And you want to ask these tough questions. Well, he might simply say I don't know what I want see Folks, I didn't choose my relationship with Marie Under the guys that I didn't know what I wanted. I was crystal clear on what I wanted See when someone's crystal clear, then they make the choice of who they want to invest in And I made the choice to invest in her and thankfully she made the choice to invest in me See in this particular case what you might be experiencing is what's known as a casual relationship And what it means is a casual relationship again is monogamy. It's exclusivity. It's companionship connection and sex without any real direction That's a casual relationship Now you might be thinking well, it's only six or seven weeks in yeah It's still casual because it wasn't established right from the get-go I want you to think about this back in the day You know used to be not less than a hundred years ago that if two people wanted to have sex They had to get married why mostly because there was a consequence of having sex with someone that wasn't Your husband meaning if you had children together, there was a consequence to that And now we don't have those consequences because of birth control and whatnot And certainly sex is something anybody can you know, we are free to have sex whenever we want At the same time when you become physically intimate with someone you bond with this person So shouldn't it make sense that we have deeper conversations in the early stage of dating right from the get-go Before you actually begin that bonding process So you're six or seven weeks at what do you do about this? You have a real sit real heart to heart you lay your cards on the table say look I genuinely care about you And I find myself You know becoming attached to you And at the same time I don't want to get attached to a person who doesn't want the same things as I do So the type of relationship I'm looking for is a relationship where we spend three or four days and nights a week together Doing shared activities hobbies mutual interests spending time with family and friends Traveling together teamwork building skills both in our personal and our professional life Intimacy both physical and emotional intimacy that leads to either moving in together getting married. That is what I want What is it that you want doesn't mean you have to want what I want? I just want to know what you want And if it's not the same thing, maybe we should walk away from this And a lot of men are winging it. They're winging it. They're winging it. They're like, I don't know what I want Well, those men who don't know what they want make terrible partners Not to mention those men where the ground underneath them doesn't feel solid Meaning that their life doesn't feel solid so they can't fully support a fully committed relationship Folks, it's incumbent upon you to to actually speak up To speak up and I'm going to ask Marie to stop doing what she's doing because I hear that noise and it's affecting me right now You guys can't hear but I could So thank you for saying you're sorry. My point is folks It's incumbent upon you. You can't leave it up to the guy to know what you want You have to tell him what you want in relationship if you're going to have any chance of actually having this relationship have any legs And when I say tell him what you want It's it's more of tell him what you want in the first off have clarity on what you want Have clarity on the type of relationship you want. That's first and foremost have that clarity And second Describe that to the other person and see if you're on the same page with them. That's what I did with my beloved We agreed that we wouldn't explore we weren't going to do this unless we were going to explore a relationship together We were crystal clear now. I led the charge in this particular case. I happen to know what I want You have to know what you want express it And then see if they're on the same page and if you're not then you make a decision Do you want to invest in a person that may not be there in the long run? For Jonathan, we're just dating. We don't know each other too well folks Here's the bottom line It doesn't it well first off it takes about 40 hours to get to know someone To know if you really want to explore a relationship with you It takes about 100 hours to build trust with a person face to face time to build trust And it takes about 200 hours to really experience this person as a good friend Okay, that's about the amount of time it takes. By the way, this isn't the world according to Jonathan I heard that from Jay Shetty Who wrote the book eight rules of love. I believe it's called so If you if you too if he if you've spent 40 hours together He knows whether or not he wants to explore a relationship with you Okay, the next 60 hours is are you going to build enough trust? To know that you want partnership with this person and it's better that you're on the same page Versus investing in someone who doesn't want what you want That's my two cents. Anyway, so coming back to the question Hey, you lay your cards on the table now. Would you rather know now that it's A relationship worth investing in or would you rather know? Would you rather want to know now if this person isn't going to be a long-term partner?  Anyways, that's my invitation for y'all All right, I hope you found value in this video if you do, please post a comment below I'd like to hear your thoughts as always if you find value in the group Please tell your friends about midlife love mastery send them to my website Jonathan as a dot com Have them click the group coaching button so they can join our fantastic group and I'm going to sign up This video as I always do first off give myself a big gigantic job of self love I'm going to reach into the camera and give you a hug of love if that's okay I'm asking you to turn to someone a pet a teddy bear pillow give itter them a hug of love Because hugs are a great source of love and let's face it. We could all use more love in our lives Thanks a bunch. Bye. Bye now


In the previous class, we have learnt about the different competitive environmental strategy, the four different corporate strategy where the environmental concerns are being integrated, that is eco-efficiency, beyond compliance leadership, eco-branding and environmental cost literacy. So, in this session, we will try to create a matrix, the so called competitive environmental strategy matrix and we will see taking the examples of few of the companies, the Indian context and we will see that how their activity, how their sustainability initiative, we can map into the environmental strategy or how it can be whatever the initiative, whatever the activities they are taking, how it can be coming out from the strategy, what they have taken to integrate the environmental concern. So, we have taken, so in order to create this strategy matrix, we have selected few companies and taking these five companies, what are the initiative, what are the activities they have taken, we have mapped it into the environmental strategy and this entire exercise, this competitive environmental strategy matrix exercise is adapted from a course project. When I was teaching a course in the last semester, this is a group project by one of the group, what they have submitted, what they have presented for this course on business and sustainable development. Now, let us see before formulating the competitive environmental strategy matrix, let us briefly see what are the activities the companies they have done or what is the profile of this company. So, the first one is Hindustan Unilever, this is the largest FMCG company in India and if you look at 9 out of 10 Indian household use its product. The sustainability initiative is Unilever Sustainable Living Plan USLP and the focus is to create the company better suited to survive in the future. It has three goals, improving health and well-being more than 1 million, reducing environmental impact by half, enhancing the livelihood for the million and also whatever the initiative they have taken that is aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Now, what are the activities they have taken to reduce the environmental impact? They have reduced the CO2 reduction, CO-timeser reduction by 85 percent, waste usage reduced by 58 percent, this is with a base per turn or a specific year. Then the total waste generated from factory reduced by 63 percent that is per turn production in India against the baseline of 2008. Then 59 turns of plastic waste disposed into the eco-friendly manner since 2018. Then they have maintained the status of zero non-hazardous waste to landfill in all HUL factory and also share of the renewable energy at HUL site increased to 71 percent in 2019. This is the initiative for GHG gases that is carbon positive manufacturing. So, second one is a type over this should be coal and this is the eliminating coal from the energy mix by 2020 and move to biomass boiler. Then transportation load more travel less, emission reduction by 14 percent and refrigeration that is the hydrocarbon represent instead of HFC impacting this much freezer in HUL fleet. Now, they have taken the initiative for sustainable sourcing that is through palm oil and here the with a commitment to no deforestation and purchasing certified RSPO. Then paper and board they have sourced from FSC that is the forest ward council certified vendor and move to lower Grammage paper and this is what they have done for the tea that is 653 tea state are trusty verified and 263 state are rainforest alliance verified which impact 26 percent of the Indian small folder farmers. So, mostly they are sourcing it from the certified supplier and similarly for the sustainable agriculture practices they have extended to fruit, vegetable and coffee. This is what their initiative with respect to water that is water usage in agriculture and also reduce water extraction by manufacturing side through the freshwater extraction, rainwater harvesting and maximize the usage of arrow plants. This is the initiative with respect to waste that is reused and recycle of the non hazardous waste then partnership with UNDP for the circular economic reduce packaging through resizing SQs then 100 percent plastic packaging will be reusable recycle in right 2025. Now, coming to the second company that is Godrej consumer product limited founded in 1936 one of the leading FMC's in India they are more clean to personal and household care product and has five product segments. They have taken the sustainability initiative being good and green in 2015 and motivation behind this is to provide high quality affordable goods over billion of consumers around the world creating and sharing value of all stakeholder and environment. Their sustainability goals to become carbon neutral have a positive water balance have zero waste to landfill reduce energy consumption by 30 percent increase renewable energy consumption 30 percent and alignment to SQs. Now, the achievement and initiative what they have done that ranges from redressing the greenhouse gases to looking at how much they have saved in term of reducing the thickness of the synthal soap wrapper then efficient packaging of expert power power hair dye helps save nine metric tonnium of materials then energy consumption from renewable sources to 55 percent. So, their achievement initiative starts from the impact start from the raw material and also the end disposal of the product. This is the energy they have adopted the green energy sources like solar and biomass and they have installed the microgrid in several villages in Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Uttarakhand and to reduce the emission and carbon neutrality achieve carbon neutrality they have taken up initiative for renewable biomass for boilers procurement of renewable energy then also installation of the energy efficient equipment. This is for the initiative with respect to water through integrated watershed development project or when it comes to waste management how to implement the community waste management project and here they invest in the technology and has tie up with social entrepreneurship to invest in the other capital expenditure. Then the third company is ITC. This is India's multinational conglomerate and has diversified presence across cigarettes, FMCG, hotels, packaging and agri business. Their sustainability initiative is putting India first that is the with a tag of reimagining future 2020 and motivation is to lead the innovative business model that synergies the economic wealth and formation of ecological and social capital as a unified strategy. The practices is their sourcing the raw material from the energy from renewable sources, carbon positive for 15 years in a row and 7 ITC units met more than 90 percent of the electrical energy recurrent from the renewable sources. Then these are few more whatever they are taking as the sustainable practices and one of the highlight over here they are along with the philosophy of the responsible luxury where ITC hotel was among the first luxury hotel chains in the world to eliminate the single use plastic usage in operation. Then also they have the lead certified building 30 lead certified building by March 2020. Then coming to the fourth company that is Tata Chemical they incorporated in 1936 under chemical sector and they are ranked third in the FutureScape India's top company for sustainable 2020 into the business of soda ash manufacture. This is their environmental goals and targets what they have highlighted like science based target initiative or through waste management or the renewable initiative and to reduce the carbon emission water neutrality and 100 percent packaging material recycling. And these are the sustainability initiative that is listed or that is from their sustainability report you will find that is in the initiative in energy conservation, emission management, waste management and water conservation. Also in the and how they have taken the how they have mapped the performance into this that is through the indicators like climate change performance that is through the CO2 emission, water management that is through the freshwater withdrawal and waste generator disposed through the hazardous waste air emission and also recycled material consumption. And if you look at the green one showing the status that there is a decrease or increase which is positive and whatever the red one that is the increase. Now coming to the next profile of the company what we have chosen that is Mahindra and Mahindra they are the MNC Automotive Manufacturing Corporation largest vehicle manufacturer by production and the largest manufacturer tractors in the world. Their sustainability goal is reboot, reinvent, reignite and thus rise has taken several initiative towards providing alternate sustainable choice to the consumer through thinking product and the business model. This is the sustainability framework for Mahindra. The tagline is by partnering learning and sharing giving make more rather than what we take from our ecosystem. So, here the initiatives are categorized into people, planet and profit and for planet they are the specific goals what they have thought of that is Mahindra beliefs in transforming 150 billion dollar company to carbon neutral by 2040 reduction in waste and becoming water positive. Similarly, people is for people it is making the best workplace in manufacturing and also employing to take the sustainability and CSR initiative and for profit drive green venture in group through new EV launches making sustainable supply chain and green building. This is their activity with respect to carbon emission, energy, water security and waste to wealth. So, after introducing the profile of the company and whatever the initiative they have taken, now when we are trying to map the initiative or few of the activity initiative into the strategy the core environmental strategy what we have discussed under the four category this is how the matrix looks like. So, the few of the activity that is coming in HUL that is coming in eco efficiency, few in environmental cost leadership, few in eco branding and few in the beyond compliance leadership. So, like one example can be shifting to renewable source of energy hence lower TCO that is HUL or net carbon positive renewable energy shift that is through by ITC then redesign synthal shift 8 K metric ton of materials that is through the Godres and similarly for the Tata and chemical. So, all the activities it is being mapped into the different strategy and this is how the corporate environmental strategy matrix looks like for all the all the companies what we have discussed and typically we have taken just the case of the five company and the more we look into the what are the sustainability initiative or sustainability activities done by the company will be able to map it with the strategy and we will see that that activity is typically coming from their corporate strategy what they have taken. So, the other example can be eco branding is sustainably sourced tea palm oil or Mahindra and Mahindra introduced the four variant of the electric vehicle to drive the sustainability in India. So, the activities the to summarize the session the activity the initiative what we are taking this is this typically comes under the environmental strategy. So, the idea is not that there are part of it is corporate strategy part of it is environmental strategy. In fact, in the part of the corporate strategy only when the environmental concern gets added accordingly the intervention action and initiative of the company changes in the direction of the sustainability. Thank you.


Hi everybody, I'm Jen with opensource.com and this is a brand new edition of our weekly top five articles of the week The most popular things on the site for our readers for February 5th at number five Getting started with the Crusader file manager Managing files is a constant task for users who want to maintain order inconsistency David both explains how to get started with Crusader At number four Kubernetes in five minutes Jamie Duncan says containers are making us rethink how we deliver software, but they have their limits Scaling them requires an important tool for extending their purchase Kubernetes to some it's the future of IT one in which containers play an increasingly important role At number three is brave the new champion the open web needs Ben Carinza interviews Mozilla CEO and Javascript from founder Brandon H about the browser brave and what makes it different At number two cluster computing with Ansible and Raspberry Pi We shared Jeff Garling's video that walks us through the basics of Ansible and open source IT automation tool using a cluster of six Raspberry Pi computers and finally at number one GPIO zero and Raspberry Pi programming starter projects One of the most exciting starter activities to do with a Raspberry Pi is something you can't do on your regular PC or laptop Such as flash an LED or control a motor and this month's Raspberry Pi column Ben Nuttle shows you how to get started And we have an honorable mention this week this week We gave out our annual community awards to recognize contributors and articles that blew everyone's socks off last year Our community voted to select the four winners of our people's choice award The four winners of our readers choice award and the three winners of our best interview award Our community moderators also chose two very passionate open source folks to win the moderators choice award And finally the open source comm team selected 10 emerging contributors to be recognized Check them out and their great articles on the site. That's it for the top five. Thanks for joining me and I'll see you next time


Anything for the trotty? Everything we all get out. Anything for the trotty? You are already ready. Anything for the trotty? Anything, anything! Anything for the trotty? Yeah, could I have a naggin and