What's up everybody, Jason here for Jaspy's CaseBrakes.com. 2022 hip parade baseball, autographed limited edition, series 12 just sold out. This is a dual case break, random teams number one.  There's the sell sheet hits right there, potentially for you guys. Let's get some big hits guys, here we go. Here's the dice roll, here's the cousin Bernadette. So Tyler down to Ryan Herald got those straight up and then Greg down to Kenny got those from the Top's Chrome jumbo pack filler. And then you got the Braves or Diamondbacks down to the Nationals. Roll the dice, we got a one and a five, six times, here we go, one, two, three, four, five, six. Six times, six, Jason K at the top down to Kenny. We got six, six, one, two, three, four, five, six. Six times, six times, Marlins down to the Orioles. There you go. Let's check it out, so Jason K with the Marlins, Joe with the Giants, Ryan Herald, Cincinnati Reds, Charles Wolfkin with the Cardinals, Jason K with the Rangers, Will with the Braves, David H with the Nationals, Dan with the Mariners, Will with the Astros, Tyler, Tigers, Kyle, Pirates, Jason K with the Cubs, Tristan, White Sox, Ed, Yankees, Tristan, Angels, Jeremy Port, Brewers, Dan Royals, Lonnie with the Phillies, Blair with the Guardians, Charles with the Blue Jays, Eugene with the Padres, Tyler with the Rockies, Charles with the Twins, Tristan with the Red Sox and Metz, Eugene with the Dodgers, Charles with the A's, Tristan with the Rays, Greg with the Diamondbacks, and then Kenny with the Baltimore Orioles. All right, if you guys want to trade, I'll give you guys a quick minute. If not, we're gonna be starting soon. Let's just close it then. I went through all the orders too, so I'm pretty much caught up. Good thing you got a strong chin, Ryan. Remember, we're psychology, we didn't get nothing today. Nada in this break. Nada. I'm gonna switch up the mojo. A one-of-one start us off. On-card spring fever for the Yankees, C.C. Sabati. Who has a Yankees Ed? There you go, man. One-of-one. I have no clue, Steve. If I had to take a guess, it's probably an error. So, I honestly wouldn't know, man. If it seems like it is a blank back and a blank front, then it's definitely like an error. Unless it's a super short-perm from Capstone's, which I don't think so, though. But you should look it up on eBay, though. If you don't see anything, then most likely it's probably just an error. Trevor Stoyer, really, for the Colorado Rockies. There you go. Man, he was so hot at one point. His bowman first. That dude was selling for so much money. Colorado Rockies with that one. That is Tyler Sandberg. And then we got for the Dodgers, Alan again to Cody Bellinger. Let's see how he does with the cubbies. Hopefully he does well, man. He's a fan favorite here. Eugene with the Dodgers. Now, guys, we do have another two cases of this for another dual-case breakdown. We could technically do this tonight if you guys want, but if not, probably definitely tomorrow. And then for Detroit, Spencer Torkelson. Look at that. Gold, gold. That's 64 to 75 here, but it looks pretty awesome. Detroit Tigers going to Tyler as well. And then a Manny Machado debut autograph, five out of 10, and that is from 2017, Paulus. And that is a Baltimore Orioles edition. Baltimore Orioles is Kenny. Wow. Reverse mojo. So Ryan here ain't going to get squat in this break. And look at that. How about a Cincinnati Reds Ken Griffey Junior edition? 18 out of 25. Oh man, that's hilarious. There you go, man. I'm going to do that from now on, Ryan.  See, if it wasn't going to be your day, that would have been a Seattle Mariners edition. If it wasn't your day. That was funny. Congrats, man. All right, we got a Bowen draft, Jordan McCann's Boulder Fractor first, PSA nine. That's five out of 50. Or like it had to be a randomizer between the Reds and the Mariners. It was like a past and present or something like that. And then you lost it. That definitely would have been like your luck if it went that way. Congrats, though, man. One thing I will say though is that they do put a lot of Ken Griffey Junior in hit parade because I think, you know, fan favorite people love it. He signs a lot. So most likely when you have Seattle or the Reds, I mean, there's a good chance that you might get a Ken Griffey Junior or like a Joey Vado or something. Spencer Strider rookie autograph. That's for the Inline of Braves. Will Christian with that one. And have we had a cell sheet out yet? No. Oh, actually, you know what? The Ken Griffey Junior was a cell sheet here, right? How about that? So the Ken Griffey Junior was the big hit on this side. And we got a Chris Bryant, Trevor Ralligan Otto, the 99, 2017 Tubbies, Jason K. Which one was that one? And a Luba Chicago White Tox Tristan with that one. So a Bowman high-tech prospect, Luba. All right, so all the first case right there. So the big case right there was the Ken Griffey Junior. Let's see what we have on this side. So it was like a one box break and we had to randomize that and you lost it.  I mean, I hit a dual Loba man two weeks ago, last week on Wednesday, on release day, I hit a dual Loba man, autograph, Scotty Barnes and Kate Cunningham. Thank God we didn't have to randomize that. It was a personal box, so. All right, Casey Mizer, RPA to 49 for Detroit. We have a Frank Thomas, The Big Heart, to 25. Another one for the White Tox Tristan. A Max Freed, that's for Atlanta. Will Christian, feels a little heavy. No, I think if that was a Loba man randomizer, I think we kind of established that if it's like a big hit like that, we're talking, you know, 10 plus $1,000 card. I think we, I think in the past, we've kind of suggested that we would probably let the customers decide. They both agree they want to randomize it, if we do it, if not, then we either sell it for them or they get to split the profit or vice versa. Wow, there we go. Tristan, chilling in the Turks. Well, I don't think we're gonna send this to the Turks for you, but pulling this in the Turks. Mike Trout, five-star autograph, 24 out of 25. Nice hit. And look at that, you even got a congratulations code. I don't want to show you the code, but basically if you share this pool with them, you send them an email with you with the card. They'll give you a $20 gift code to their website. So we'll keep that with you there. Very nice though, man. Is that even bought one like after all of these years? Man, that's awesome, man. Trying to just pull one, right? I mean, it's so easy to click and buy, right? I mean, what's the fun in that? It's the thrill of the chase. Then we got a super futures to 50 gold that is Juan Yipez. See those Cardinals. When a Charles. All right, halfway through. Oh yes, Heritage does have one of those, I believe. I think you're right. We have another Baltimore Art of Manny. Oh, sorry, not Manny Mitchell, Trey Mancini. 13 out of 25 RPA from Gold Standard. Nice one there for the Warriors, Kenny. Alrighty, guys, down to the Final Four. Final Four. See what we can get here. We have a Miguel Cabrera Pro Signs autograph. Look how young Cabrera looks there. Florida Marlins Edition, that's going to Miami, Jason K. You have a Jordan Alvarez on card from Stadium Club. Houston, Will Christian. Wow. Two Strava stories, the same card. Nice break for the Colorado Rockies. Tyler Sanberg down. The identical same card. All right, last one here, folks. And Jaren Duran, PSA 10 Gold Refractor Rookie autograph to 50. Boston Red Sox. Boston Red Sox, that is going to Tristan. There you go, folks, just like that. So we've got the Trout and the Griffey. Now we do have another two cases. So maybe the Julio hiding in the next one, maybe the Wander Frankl, the Judge, the Bryce Harper. We have another one in store, guys. Appreciate it, guys, JasperysKeesbricks.com.


In this video, I want to recast our FIFO axiomatic system into the language of geometry. So you'll remember previously that with our FIFO axioms and axiomatic systems, we introduce these things called fees and we introduce these things called foes. What we're gonna do is actually, instead of calling them fees, we're now gonna call them a point. So interchange the word fee with point and interchange the word foe with line. There was also this relationship between fees and foes that we called belonging. So we'd say that a fee belongs to a foe. Well, now we're gonna call that incidence. So we can say that a point is incident to a line. And so make that substitution there. Fees are points, foes are lines, belonging is incident. And then we changed nothing about the theory of fee and foe. What would that look like when we rebranded as a geometric object? Cause after all points line, point lines and incidents are undefined terms. So we're FIFO and belonging. And so to be a geometry, we just have to have some notion of points lines and incidents, which FIFO, if you rebrand it, does have that. So it turns out FIFO theory is a geometry. And in fact, this is what we call three-point geometry. Where it gets its name is actually from the first axiom of FIFO theory. If we rebrand it using now lines, points and incidents, the first axiom of FIFO theory, which let me remind you, the first axiom stated that there exists exactly three distinct fees in the system. Well, we can rewrite that as there exist exactly three distinct points cause fees are now points. And that's actually where it gets its name. We're calling this three-point geometry because we have the three points given by axiom one. Axiom two of FIFO theory told us that any two distinct fees belong to exactly one foe. Well, if we rebrand that using geometric terms, that becomes the sentence. For each two distinct points, there exists a unique line containing both of them. All right? Again, slightly different phrasing, but it means the exact same thing. We had the two fees, which are now points, and they're incidents to exactly one foe, which is now called a line. Axiom three of FIFO theory was not all fees belong to the same foe. Not all fees belong to the same foe. In lines and points, that actually turns out to be not all points lie on the same line. There's no line that contains all of the points. In other words, the entire set of points is a non-colonial set. All right? Then the last one, axiom four FIFO theorem says that any two distinct foes contain at least one fee that belongs to them. Okay? I've actually really simplified the statement. I've actually written that axiom as all lines intersect because if we took the exact language and just replaced foes with lines and fees with points, we would get that any two distinct lines contain at least one point that belongs to both of them. Now that we've introduced the word intersect, which we didn't have for fees and foes, but if we introduced the word intersect, that axiom can be simplified using the definition to just be all lines intersect. Remember the axiomatic method. We first have undefined terms, then we have definitions, then we have axioms. Axioms come third on the list, and that's because the axioms themselves can use in addition to the undefined terms, they can use the definitions that we've developed. Like in this case, the word intersect simplifies, it simplifies the axiom four here that all lines intersect. Given any two lines, there's at least one point on both of them. Now the fourth step of the axiomatic method is then theorems. Once we have our axioms, we can then start proving theorems from them. Now we proved four theorems for FIFO theory, just based upon the axioms. What we've done now with three-point geometry is we just now have a new interpretation of what phi and foe mean. We're interpreting phi as point and foe as line. And with those interpretations, then all four of the axiom, excuse me, all four of the theorems then become theorems of our three-point geometry. And so they translate immediately and we're gonna look at them in just one moment. Before I do that, I want us to consider this diagram that you see here on the screen. This is actually meant to be a model of three-point geometry and hence is also a model of FIFO theory for which these little circles you see here are supposed to be illustrations of what we mean by points. So we have three circles, three dots. Those represent the three points. These straight segments you see here then represent our lines. And so we have three lines that you see right here. We have the three points that you see right here. Incidents is then indicated that if a line touches the two points, sorry, if a line touches a point, we say it's incidents to that point. So if you focus on this point right here, this line is incident to it and this line is incident to it. Similarly, if we look at this point right here, this line is incident to it, this line is incident to it. And so from this diagram, this honestly, this graph we see on the screen for which we have vertices and edges, we can use a graph to illustrate a finite geometry for which we get the incidence relations directly from it. So this is in fact a model of three-point geometry. I want you to convince yourself of that. We have axiom one, three points, great. For each pair of points, there exists a unique line that contains both of them. So if you look at this pair, there's only one line that contains both of them. If you look at this pair, there's only one line that contains both. If you look at this pair, there's only one line that contains both. So axiom two is satisfied. Axiom three, there are not all points lying the same line. If you look at all three points together, there's no line that harbors all three of them. The set of all points is non-colinear. And then lastly, all lines intersect. If you take these two lines, they intersect at this point. If you take these two lines, they intersect at this point. If you take these two lines, they intersect at this point. And so this is in fact a model of three-point geometry. And therefore it's also a model of FIFO theory. And as we discussed FIFO theory in the previous lecture, we actually discovered that the theory was complete. That is up to isomorphism, there's only one model. And therefore this is the only model of three-point geometry up to isomorphism. Now let's take a look at those four theorems I had mentioned beforehand. I'm gonna zoom out a little bit so we can see the picture of the model and the theorems as well. So look at the first theorem here in three-point geometry. And so I'm gonna start all these theorems with that statement in three-point geometry. So we know that these theorems are not broad theorems for all geometry. It's only for the three-point geometry theory we're studying right now. And three-point geometry, each line, each line has exactly two points that belong to it. You'll notice this line has two points, this line has two points, and this line has two points. It's very easy to see from the model, but if we wanna prove it from the theorem for the theory, excuse me, we need to prove it from the axioms. Cause how do we know there aren't different models than this one? I said the theory is complete, but that's only because of these four theorems. From these four theorems, we can derive that every model is isomorphic to this one. All right, the second theorem of FIFO, which becomes a theorem of three-point geometry states that a line is completely characterized by the points on it. That is, if two lines are distinct, then they do not contain the same points. So if you look at these two lines right here, notice they have different points. If you look at these two lines, notice they have different points. If you look at these two lines, you'll notice they have two different points. So no two lines contain the exact same points. All right, so a line is actually determined, it's characterized by the points it's incidence to. So we actually could have defined lines to be sets of points. There would be no difference in the theory if we had done that. Theorem three in three-point geometry, two distinct lines intersect at exactly one point. So Axiom four told us that all lines intersect, in which we check, they all do, but furthermore, we know that the intersection is unique. You don't get something like the following where you could have two lines that intersect at two different points. We don't have anything like that in the picture. That's easy to see. And then the last one in three-point geometry, there are exactly three distinct lines for which we prove this in general. And that's true for a model because this is the only model of disomorphism. So with the right perception, many axiomatic theorems can be thought of as geometries. As long as we have a notion of line and point, then we have a geometry. And so our FIFO theory is also a geometric theory. And so going forward, we're never gonna talk about fees and foes again. We'll just talk about three-point geometry. And in the next video, we'll introduce another finite geometry that we haven't yet seen so far.


Hi everyone, in this tutorial we're going to show you how to get the current time in Python. In order to get the current time in Python, we must import datetime module. Okay, let's import datetime module. Then we need to call now function from datetime class. Let's do that, datetime.datetime. Now then let's call function time. I'm gonna add this function to my code. Then we need to convert our current time to the string. And for example let's save it to a variable time. Finally in this example I'm gonna just print this information about current time. And as you can see we've get our current time. That's all in this tutorial. Don't forget to subscribe to our channel. See you in the next tutorial. Bye.


tempt to satisfy, but who possibly is gonna sign up for six month lease? I mean, I just, I know they're talking about this temporary office kind of concept, and I mean, other than somebody who would take a lease in the hopes of then they could purchase, I could, but anyhow, good luck. If we can do it, do it. Yeah, if I may, Mr. Chairman. I think that's a very fair concern, and when we met with the working group, I think we were somewhat inspired by the public feedback we had, and thought about putting together a process that would allow either one of those people or some part of those groups, or maybe some of those groups together putting together some kind of application that frankly could have some income come into the town while we were preparing to sell it, while also meeting some of those needs that were expressed. So you're right, it may not work out, but I think all that's lost is the work that goes into the RFP, because we'll still be following the second path of trying to sell it. I agree with Adam on that, and that it's, we've heard quite a lot of talk about people asking us to take, asking the town to take the initiative to try to create these types of co-working spaces, or places where residents can come together during the day, and I think that shutting the door on this property and saying absolutely no might deflate that a little, and I think that this might provide an opportunity to a lot of residents who might be able to make this work. And I think that as Adam said, we're not losing anything by giving it a shot. So, yes, thank you. Just two quick questions, and I'm not gonna say it right. When we do the RFP, can we have language in there that it's sort of as is? Absolutely.  So we can do that. I'm calling it as is. Can I, I'm sorry, to respond, can I, Mr. Chairman? Yes. Just to respond to your question Ms. Mahon, we could certainly, in fact, most of our town leases currently are as is. I will say that does not prevent tenants from occasionally making arguments about certain things like implied warranties and things like that, but our leases as they are already structured in that way to try to make sure that folks understand very explicitly when they're taking on a town building, we're not in the business of doing this to make a profit on commercial enterprises. We're in the business of trying to, you know, provide resources for the town. And then to Mr. Dunn's point, in terms of thinking, if everything goes within the normal timeline, we're talking about 12 months out, if for some reason the sale ultimately didn't happen for two or three years, would I be correct that the scenario would probably be if this ran out in a year and we realized we're gonna go out another year or two, you basically would represent us with this cover memo that we have here that's again asked for authorization to once again extend it to year two or year three. And I'm not saying this is a three year thing, but in terms of this is the process that's defined right now, but there's nothing precluding us that, if for some reason it gets extended in the future, then you can just present that to us and we can say, okay, those are the new terms extended out year two, year three. What we might have to do in that situation, depending on how that first RFP and then lease is structured, if we went out to that longer period of time, we might end up having to re-bid it. So town council had mentioned we might wanna put in the lease, something that talks about a month to month tenancy in some interim period. So if something, you know, was falling short with the sale process and was gonna take longer than we thought then we could get in a situation where we had to issue a bid again. But if we do have the flexibility that Doug mentioned, I think we could work. Because I envision once we have this warrant article hearing at town meeting that we're all gonna sort of get the sense of what the body sort of thinks there and that might help us frame our timetable better. So I'll let you all work with the parameters of the language for that. So, okay, thank you. Thank you. Yes, Kevin. I was actually thinking of the space since I was down once they were talking. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I was too. They say you got the leaky roof and the floor's flooded. From the TV, sorry. Thanks, Mr. Chair. Any further discussion? I would just say, I think this synthesizes very nicely what we heard. I'm happy to support it. Thank you. Discussion from the audience? Just one question. Well, I'll bring those again. What's the value of that? Of the property? It's assessed for around, well, 500,000. You know, I'm not 100% sure of the stock. So we had a confidential appraisal performed that we, I wouldn't recommend that we speak about publicly at this point in terms of the town's bargaining position, but I think that assessment's a fair value. Okay, because it seems like short money in terms of having an impact on the school. Half million there, half million there. Every big counts, every big counts. So we have a motion to second all those in favor. Please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Thank you. Thank you. And finally, Mr. Greeley, discussion and adoption of the Selectman's Handbook, chapter six, which is town meeting. And if you're not tired enough already. But just like we've done before, if you'd like to take it from the top, I mean, if anybody, any members of the board, you know, feel that there's wording or something they'd like changed. If I, so we'll open it up for discussion from the board. Joe. I'm actually happy to move approval. Second. I read it, I thought it was great. Well, thank you. I'm always, it is my, I'm moving approval. Sorry. Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Thank you for the second. No, second, Joe. Second, sir. Any amendments that anybody would like to make? No, Joe. No, sir. I'm happy, Mr. Greeley, and I read every word. Oh my God. So we have a motion and a second. Well, I would like to bring up one issue that we had discussed. That's, I forgot about that. Well, it's just, and really I think the way it is, it comes out as what we have to leave it as. But it, it has bothered me over the years and a few times, I would say a handful is probably more than necessary. But if you remember reading through here, as you know, we, we developed the warrant and those bodies necessary, those bodies responsible ourselves, finance committee, zoning hold hearings. Well, I don't like when proponents will not come before us for a hearing and yet it is still debated on town meeting floor just with the substitute motion. And we toyed with and talked for quite a while about is there a way we could put in some, some wording related to, I feel when we are moving no action, it's because in the history of our community, we have reasonable argument. If both sides are not presented, you can't really reach probable truth. You didn't know I was an Aristotelian, did you? You just didn't realize that about me, right? But, but really if the proponents for a warrant article don't come before us and explain it, our only vote is no action. Similar to a vote where proponents do come before us and we move no action for whatever multiple reasons there may be, including it's something we might take care of without meeting a town meeting warrant article anyhow. So you'll see there's not really any wording in there, but one thing we would like to do going forward is in a select one's report somehow indicate that that no action vote is a result of the proponents failing. But I wish town meeting would then not take up the substitute motion, but. So like no action with prejudice or something? Well, with extreme prejudice, but yeah. Sorry. Thank you for listening to me and again, I thank Doug, Steve, Eve, Mary Ann who are all, we're advisors, we're not an official committee. We're a support group. Thank you. That's right. Sometimes it feels like a support group. Mr. Dunn. I just had one thought, which is something that has kind of troubled me over the, but and this doesn't directly address and I wonder if we want to, which is talking about, it is entirely appropriate that we place things on the agenda, excuse me, on the warrant, but it is not entirely clear how the board does. Sometimes we take votes explicitly. We say, you know, this thing should be there. Then there are other things that we all agree just should be there or like, you know, the board administrator knows that we want there and that it appears on the warrant, but we don't actually take a formal vote on that. And I wonder if we want to consider going forward, you know, in a January meeting talking about how that happens. Mr. Greeley's nodding. No, it's something we discussed, but I believe it's in there, Doug. That's correct. I think that we've made that clear. It was a discussion and it does say by vote here, it doesn't go into further detail about what the timeline of that process would be, how that should go, you know, how that motion should be raised. So the intent was that this would actually, that we would, this would help us change our actual practice is what you're aiming at. Yeah, I think, okay. More uniform. Mr. Greeley, literally in the past, one member of the board could ask for a warrant article and it could be placed on there. What we're now saying is no, that one member of the board or there's a member of the board that didn't get that. Or there's one member of the board would have to get 10 registered votes. That it's the board of select when that produced the warrant by majority vote thereof. Can I just, it wouldn't be that, Ms. Mahoney, it wouldn't be that you'd have to get 10 registered voters. It's, I'm sorry, unless you're saying- Oh no, I don't want to go in past history. That's okay, everything in here is great. Okay, so it's a majority vote of the board. Majority vote of the board. Right, but that was your only other option. Mr. Greeley, you just made me even happier with this. All right, we're all happy.  Opening them up. But it was exactly that situation. That was, we had a good time. Yeah, actually, there is another issue that I actually, something I've thought about in the past is actually the ordering of the articles in the warrant. I think properly fall underneath the- No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that's a fair point, John. I know, but it's- And I don't know if we ever actually take a vote on- Do we take a vote on the final warrant before- If I may, I think there's some reasonable attitude that the board has to be afforded through its office, that its board administrator has assigned the tasks to the board and that practically speaking, the order of the warrant is arranged by the board of select men's designees and agents. It's not as if it comes from, it's not as if someone else puts it together. There are obviously the town manager is instrumental in helping to provide very strong recommendations for what that order should be, but it is this board's office that is the one responsible for that. I know, and the only reason I raise it is that there has been discussion, at some times in the past, about whether or not it's beneficial. Now, we haven't moved to change it, but whether or not it's beneficial, for example, for new town meeting members to be confronted with complicated zoning articles is the very first thing when they walk into the town meeting and whether there isn't another way that could be considered in the future. Now, we haven't moved on that, but I know, yeah, Dan's shaking, is that like- Sorry, I'm- But it does seem like it's potentially a, you know, it does have a policy implication. I hear you, but I've personally, I have no interest in trying to change that. And I also think that there is no JV team in town meeting. There is no like, well, here's your warm-up town meeting. Like, you show up at town meeting. It is town meeting. There is no way around that. I agree, and I do think that I don't, this is, it's funny, because this is the, everything that we're talking about right now, we have talked about- You're talking about even getting stuck. I'm glad you get to do it twice. You should have just gabbled this vote thirsty. No, I'm regretting that. 20 minutes. Well, we're talking about the importance of, you know, saying that us in our office has the authority, but also being able to, you know, take, you know, other matters into consideration when setting it. So as opposed to having, you know, boom, boom, boom, it can, you know, we have some leeway there. Okay, so- Well, and again, I hope I'm not losing votes, but we actually had it in there and have taken it out. But there is a big issue related to it, which is what our staff goes through. We do not have final say. The board, our staff does not have final say on- I understand, but they're still pushed, because they're the ones who put it together. And, you know, someone wants an article brought up way late in the meeting, because they know people have stopped coming at that point in time. Zoning isn't crazy about being first up at town meeting, but I think for us to try to describe it any better, and I wanna give Marianne, I don't know that you'd like to say anything at this point, Marianne, but should the manager have the right to decide where he wants, you know, many of the articles that are related to him? Yes, he should, but I think we need to keep it. It's channeled through the chairman, you know, that final decisions on the warrant, like on an agenda, no? You don't like that? I'm not saying anything. Well, do you like the idea of it has to be channeled through the chairman? I like that, but I just, you know, I'm Marianne. I don't wanna- Yes, Marianne. With Don, sorry. At ease of the office, it would be nice for everybody to be at one round table at one point in time and figure it instead of moving, you know, over the course of, you know, one to two weeks. I would, for what it's worth, this paragraph at the bottom on the left column and the bottom page two, I feel extremely strongly that the latitude and flexibility that that language affords the board is very important to be what the board endorses. I think that is, it provides latitude. There's some guidance in there. I don't think it handcuffs the board, but I don't think it dictates too much in one direction or the other, but makes clear that it is the board's ultimate authority. And if there's a time where the board needs to exercise that authority stronger than one year, then another, it's there. But if there's another time that the board doesn't need to do that, it also doesn't need to exercise that authority. May I also add a point? I'm sorry. Yes, please. Also, I think it's important to be aware of things like open meeting law. We wanna make sure that if there come times where this board needs to affirmatively say we're gonna meet and decide what the warrant article order will be, that they can do that. But if interest and efficiency, it's vested in the chairman, it's sort of been the practice of this board that with the Office of Board of Selectment Staff provides the flexibility that Mr. Chaplain I think is talking about. Yes, Tim. So I mean, I continue to like this document. I continue to think that it says the right thing. I do have, I did get, I do understand that the office staff has some, they get pulled and pushed in some ways. And I think it's right for us to try to fix that. I'm not sure that this document is the right thing. So maybe one way to do it is to take a separate vote at a different time that says that where we indicate, where we specifically confer upon the chair, the authority on this particular warrant to please reorder things. And then when Mary Ann and Mary and Fran get pushed and pulled, they've got a little bit of a, well, I will pass your comments onto the chairman. And then, you know, that gives them the backstop that they need to get the work done that they do. And it makes Steve's life harder. That sounds great. Second making Mr. Chairman's life harder. And can I, I wanna agree with that. If the chairman with the selectments office can set up some sort of vehicle that similar to when people don't show up for warrant article hearings that it's basically three heads sort of making that are involved in this process that when the chairman and the board of selectments office says this is the time, you come in and you have all your 20 and you don't say, well, here's 10. I'll get back to you on the other 10. And then you're calling four days later on the other five. There should be some sort of cutoff day pending any extraneous circumstances that that's it.  How about the hearing or the order? The order, mostly the order. In terms of for them getting the warrant prepared and ready to go that when you have that one meeting similar to when we have a warrant article, you know, those three titular heads that I'm thinking of sort of involved with that that now the chairman will oversee, you're ready to go on everything and let's get it in there because everybody and no more picking up the phone, calling four days later and then three days later. And you know, recognizing that something else may come up. I'm not saying it's hard and firm, but that practice really should stop because it just drives, I mean, I've been in the office years ago and know what it put me through before how extraneous it is now. I think I confess that I feel like we're talking about different things because I'm not familiar with it. Okay, we'll talk about it in a future meeting. I'm not familiar with it. So, well, I mean, I don't mind talking about it now if you want, but the thing that I'm talking about is one interested party says, let's make this article number 78. And another interested party says, oh, that article should be 16. And another interested party says, oh, this one should be 38. And they're all town leaders, they're all, but that's the back and forth that I was trying to refer to. And what I'm saying is when that process happens, it happens and that's it, there's a cutoff. Okay. Unless there's extenuating circumstances. But I'll let the chairman hand that. I think that's, yeah, let's do that. I've worked in there in that song. I can't relay it because I'll probably take off at least five, six different town leaders. So, I think it's probably a whole time we take a vote. So we have a motion to second. All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Seeing none. We have correspondents received. Receipt? Parking issues on Chestnut Street. We had a move to seat. So we, is there an update on this? I thought. Yeah. It was on the desk. Oh, it was on the desk. There, I thought so. So, Corey is not recommending any changes and we'll discuss this at a future board meeting. But thank you. So. Move or seat? Move or seat. Do we have a second? Second. All in favor please say aye. Aye. Opposed? Seeing none. So, it will be on another agenda so we can inform. Yes. Dr. Ashenbow and. That's correct. New business. I do have one thing. January 12th. Do you want to consider moving your meeting earlier? I'm not sure when the master planning committee meeting is but it sounded like you may be interested in being. Is that something you want to do? Maybe. Perhaps. When's our next meeting? The eighth? No, the eighth. Yes. Perhaps that's, be more apt to discuss it on the eighth. Maybe. I just, I don't think I'm ready to move that around right now. Thank you. Anything else? No. Doug? I hope the member of this board have a wonderful Thanksgiving and I also note that as December is right around the corner if there are any warrant articles than any individual selectmen are considering or contemplating, please get in touch with me is at your earliest convenience. Thank you very much. That's it for me. One piece of new business. I know I have let the board members know this but I wanted to officially announce that we have hired a new library director, Peter Trezaro. He's currently the library director in Winthrop. He definitely is going to bring a lot of innovation and creativity and just excitement to the library. A lot of things about him remind me of the person he's replacing and I think he also has a skill set that'll bring a whole new take to the library. So we're very excited. I know the library staff is very excited. He wanted to be here tonight to meet the board. I said, well, let me get you on the agenda. So sometime in December we'll have him here before the board to introduce him. Thank you very much. That's all I have. Excellent. Kevin? Just two quick things. One is so far we have one gig for the select tones for you all to get on your calendars. December 20th at 2 p.m. We're actually going to do a concert at Brightview up at Sims. And we're waiting to hear the other date for it will probably be Drake Village a night earlier that week. But I'll, I'm just waiting, working with John Griffin and we'll have a date for you. Can you make us a tour? It's a Saturday at 2 o'clock. You could have a solo. Asked Mr. Curell.  No, and the other is just a personal piece of business. Just, this is your last chance this week to see my wife's artwork which hangs in the hallway here in the second floor of Town Hall. The show ends this weekend after Thanksgiving. So there is some talent in the Greeley family, but it's in my wife. It's out in the hall. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Mr. Curell, thank you. Crossing off things. You had that down? No, no, I had things that I don't even want to ask about tonight. They can wait. First off, I do want to, as was referenced earlier, the Allington High Girls Varsity Soccer Team went to states. Literally was the best teams, North versus South. My varsity cheerleading team all went voluntarily in full practice uniform to support their fellow players on the soccer team, as did some other Allington High students and athletes. And up to the last, like, 11 seconds, it was tied 2-2. But it really was a great game, and I'm really proud of all the players on the girls' soccer team. And this Sunday, up in Lowell, my cheerleading team went to states and in kind on their own, the girls' soccer team and their coach were there to cheer us on. And in the Lodge Co-Ed division, we came in fourth in the state, which I'm very proud. We were very close to nationals, but there's always next year. But I'm really so proud of this team. This is the first fall team. Fall is very competitive for cheerleading. Winter, it's a little bit more easy to get to states. I've gotten to states three times in the winter. This is the first time we've taken a fall team, because that's when all your top athletes, they do that, and then half of them go to hockey and other. So to get to states in the fall, in Co-Ed, which is also another hurdle, I'm really proud of them all, and the parents, who put in a lot of time and effort. To that end, Gina, who was here tonight, will be joining me and other seniors at the touchdown club tomorrow night, which is just a close event between Allington High, Allington Catholic, students, athletes, coaches, and others, as well as touchdown officials. She'll be giving the remarks on behalf of the cheerleaders, but it's a really nice event to get Allington High and Allington Catholic together. When we competed at regionals, Allington Catholic was in the afternoon session. They came in early to cheer on Allington High, because we've always done the converse. So I think it's a nice marriage to have that. And then to that end, something everybody is walking to is the Thanksgiving Day game down at the Warranty Pierce Field, 10 o'clock on Thursday. You really can do both. I cook for 16, but I'm down there, and it's a great event. It's gonna be cold, but I'm hoping I don't see anything in terms of rain. I can take snow. But it's really fun. It's fun to go down, especially fun to see all the guys who lined that end of the fence closer to the concession stand, and then you see all the women up in this stand. So you could pick which group you want to check in on. So everybody's welcome to come down. It's really fun. And if you down this, come over and say hi to the cheerleaders. That's it, thank you. Thank you, Diane. Ben. Just one thing, I'm gonna, I think I'm gonna bring it up under correspondent received or future agenda. I've got a request from, as I mentioned before, we lost Robert McMurray, AKA Bobby Mack earlier this year. And some of his friends are working on doing a memorial in April next year, which would be his birthday. And one of the things that they would like to do is dedicate a rock on the bike path with like a plaque. And they sought my support to get that in front of the public memorials committee. And so I'm gonna make a formal request to you all to endorse that and pass it along. I won't be at next meeting, but I'll send a, I'll write something up so that you can, you know, do it under correspondence if you see fit. So that's my only piece of business. Especially you say you can't be at the next meeting. Why not? Why can't we just do it right now? Because I'm a big fan of the agenda. Making sure it's, yeah, that's my only, yeah. Pat Peeley. Thank you, Joe. Thank you. Three quick things. Firstly, I think Jen Tripp addressed this, but I just want to remind everyone that Arlington's first lights celebration will be the weekend of December 5th, 6th and 7th. There'll be a tree lighting down at the Veterans Memorial Park at 6.30 with singing and music on December 5th, doing that the night before. December 6th, there'll be trolleys, free trolleys going up and down Mass Ave throughout the afternoon. And this is the major shop local event of the year that really brings together the three major business districts. And so we just encourage folks to come out for that. And where's the tree, Joe? They're lighting where? Just the large tree down near the fire station. It's like last year. By the War Memorial, yeah. By the War Memorial. And actually. I didn't know if they were putting up. One of the choirs, I think we all endorsed a proclamation for a visiting choir from South Africa, which is a multi-racial choir from South Africa, which is going to be visiting the town that weekend actually performing at First Parish. And they'll be performing a couple of songs at the tree lighting as well. So we're really glad to have them visiting with us. Second item, the council mentioned warrant articles from our board. I did want to mention that with the voter adoption of the Community Preservation Act, we are under the law, we will have to put forward a warrant article around the creation of the Community Preservation Committee. So that is something that we will have to take up as a board and we'll discuss that obviously at the appropriate time. And lastly, Thanksgiving is obviously coming on Thursday and I hope everyone has a great holiday. The town manager and I were at an event last week that really drove home at the meaning of Thanksgiving in the town. We were at the ribbon cutting for the new food pantry location at the old Broadway diner. And it's really an amazing story the way that it's a public-private partnership. It brought together some of our large nonprofits. The Housing Corporation of Arlington got involved with this. They've actually purchased the site and the faith communities. Many of the faith communities in this town came together and supported financially the establishment of this site, the food pantry, which served over 600 families last year. I happened to go down a couple days later because my daughter's Girl Scout troop was helping. Our Board of Youth Services was putting together over 100 bags for families in need in the town for Thanksgiving. So it just, for me, it was just a real reminder than Thanksgiving, we're all gonna sit down. We're gonna count our own blessings, but there are so many people in our town who also remember to share the blessings that they have. And I think that's something for us all to be thankful for and just encourage you all to go down and see the new location. It's really marvelous. Thank you. Thank you very much. I guess I've won a short piece of new business and that's to follow up on Ms. Mahan's comments. I couldn't go to the soccer game or the cheerleading event, but I was following AHS athletics on Twitter and I got up to the, you know, up to the second update. So I recommend everyone doing that at GoPonders. It's their Twitter handle. So that's about it though. Mocha, Jerm. Second. Motion and a second. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Aye.