Good morning everyone. How's everyone doing today? Thursday, tomorrow's Friday. A lot of things today. I think I'm just gonna watch the mat, although MCK is a good gap, too. So MCK you can watch LDS Also, you could watch Q-com looks great. No, it's tired Ever since after the holidays, I've had trouble getting up early every morning to the gym. No gym today. I've been going after after I've been trading It's so dark. It's so dark. It's so cold. It's and the days it was raining and crappy. It was just too hard to get out of bed. I've been getting caught up on my sleep. There's nothing wrong with that. Okay, I'm doing the mat Any questions? Yes, beauty sleep is good. Any questions anyone? Don't really have anything to go over here. I'm just gonna do the mat mat. Mark it extremely bullish. You gotta do the same thing today. I did it every day this week. Just do the trade and get out. But this went to another huge target yesterday, the TXT. No questions? Okay. As far as the targets go, Doug had emailed me. If you're here in a trial, you don't understand what I do, but I give lots of targets. The dream target on this yesterday was 41. That doesn't mean you hold the trade till there. This is, if you're here in a trial, I know some things I say don't make sense to you, but that's why you got to do the class before being in the room. But obviously I didn't hold this anywhere near the low of the day. So I put lots of numbers in the room. You know, I put a number in the room today on this at 134. It doesn't mean anyone should hold it till there. It's a dream target on this. Let's just so we can get a nice move in this. Look at the volume. Okay, ready to go five minutes early. Tonight's a big night of earnings, but I'm not in any of those things. So I guess it doesn't matter to me where Google goes. Completely untradable. The whole year. This looks good too. Okay, ready to go. Nothing to talk about here. Only going to watch this one thing. I don't think it matters if it rallies or not. If it rallies, we'll do it. If it drops, we'll do it. I say 2650. If this reverse wishes, though, I'm not going to do it. This can be a little wild. I should come down to the Cayman Islands and do a session live on the beach. Does Wi-Fi work there? Is it is it reliable to not cut out the Wi-Fi? It is. Never been to the Cayman Islands. If I wanted a vacation though, I wouldn't want to do anything. I wouldn't want to get up early. I wouldn't want to do anything at all. Big Fudge is trading in Vietnam tonight on Wi-Fi? Right now you're in Vietnam? Yeah, what is it? It's your 12 hours ahead. I had a friend that went there like two years ago in Vietnam. It's very difficult to communicate because the tongue zone difference was so great. Okay, good luck everyone. If it's reverse wishes, I'll flip to the MCK or LVS. Oh, look at the affirmation for today. Today is a delightful day. Money comes to me in expected and unexpected ways. Oh, that's a good one. Good luck everyone. Okay, no one should be in it yet. Okay, it's nothing to do yet. Let's do 24 by 95. Way bigger than a stop than I thought. Let's do 29 by 95. Way bigger of a stop than I thought. 29 by 95, Matt. Here, take it! Get it right now! Just take it! Get the stop in. That's it. 95. This is way bigger than a stop that I thought. Here, just grab it. Grab it, grab it. Didn't hit 29, but it's gonna... I don't think we can be any tighter. Here, be in it. Be in it, be in it. Take it, take it, take it, take it, take it. Here it goes. That was it. That was it. It was just... every day this week, I think we've gotten... We've gotten wide stops. Let's see. Okay, you can still do it if you didn't do it. You can do it right in here. I'm just gonna see if I should give it any more room. This is it. So, you got to be in it, or you can do it now. Stop was a little bit bigger than expected, but you could take it here and get a better entry. Stop's 95, and this has to hold. If this doesn't hold, then it's not gonna work, but I think that it does. It's a good gap. So here, Matt, the one thing is if this doesn't hold, it's not gonna work. That I can tell you. Let's look at the market. Look at this market. Completely and totally just incredibly bullish. Wow, there goes LBS. Oh, I gotta pay attention when I'm doing. LBS looks good. LBS. LBS and I can flip to that, but it's already going. But I... we're waiting on this. Here, this looks great. LBS just collapsed though. This is still gonna work. This is still gonna work, and it's just taking a little while. Let's see what it did here though. But this really is it. Make sure you have a stop in. I don't want to lower it, but I don't think we should. In fact, you could take more at 39 if you really want to, and LBS is going. I rated that as well. Okay Matt, this is it. It has to hold. I still like it. You could add at 39. It's just taking a little bit long. I see what it did here though. It's fighting against some people trying to go long it. Let's see who wins out. I'm gonna lower the stop, but I know that if we do, then... Here's what I'm gonna do. I'm gonna give this 90. No, I'm gonna give it over 28. I think we stay in this, but I'm gonna give it even more room. Instead of lowering the stop, I'm gonna give it a little bit more room. I'm gonna give it 28.05. That's 10 cents more. It's not that big of a deal to keep us in the trade. 28.05. And here's another entry in this. Look at this. You could do this in here. 51 by 28.05. You could add if you want. It's gonna hit. Boy, we're in the play. It's gonna go. We'll all explain this later when we're done here, but I just gave it more room. I just gave it more room. I don't think it's gonna need it. Here, 51 by 28.05. New entry. Matt. This is more like the stop I originally thought. Here it goes. Wow. Did anybody kill it? It's gonna still work. We'll go over what it did. Here, it's breaking. Wow. You got to stay with this till it gets under the low of the day because that's when it could really fall because people are long this. Let's just go over it. Let's just go over it. Tell me if you stayed with it or if you killed it. It's gonna go. Here, here, look at this. Wow. Tell me, be honest. Did you kill it or not? Wow, here we go. I know the low of the day, Matt. Boy, do I know what I'm doing. Man, there's just nobody that can read stuff like me. Gal had still in it. Pyro still in it. I, John, still in it. Sealheart still in it. Journeywoman's still in it. Sealheart, I thought if this doesn't work, it's because of you. You jinxed us because it's everything that's been beautiful all week and you haven't been here. I thought to myself when I saw you and I thought, gosh, if this doesn't work today, it'll be because you jinxed us. Isn't it too bad? Isn't it? Journeywoman's in it. Best trader got in and got out and got in again. The lecture for Steelheart, whatever that was the other day, and he wasn't here. And the whole lecture was you can't cherry pick the days that you trade. Here, Matt. Here, beautiful call. Wow. Look at this. $26 today. I probably won't see that because I won't be in it for an hour, but man, I thought to myself, let's not even talk about how well I've been doing because I don't want to jinx it. Here, Matt. Look at the market. Wow, I am so good. Here ends $2.30 in the spy. I don't know if we get there today. Tough road. Here, Matt. I should have took more here. I should have did it. Here, here, hand of the button, Matt. Let's see if we can get it down to $26.50 in one shot and just be done. $27 is the first target, though. It just did get there. If you want to take some out, you could. I think it keeps going now though because of the way it broke. But there was the first exit, okay? Did I scream? Let's go over this. I mean, let's just talk about it while we're here, while we're in it. This will help some of you. You know, we did it. This is a weird-looking bar here. We could have actually killed it right after this did this here. We could have killed it. I didn't because I gave it such a wide stop and I liked the guy. Anyways, it came up and I thought, ah crap, should we lower the stop? I thought, no, let's give it more room. So then we did. We did, we did and you could have taken more and it held. It actually went slightly over the high, I think. No, it didn't. It got within two, three cents. Either way, I didn't put the stop over the high. Anyways, you could have taken more. I did not, but you could have. This is more along the lines of the kind of entry I was originally thinking for the size of the stop. Anyways, it worked. You could have done more there and gotten out here. I'm going to hang on to this a little, little, little bit longer because of the way that it looks and because I know the traders were buying this today. There were traders today that were buying the stock into this support area right in here in this tail. But they're not the ones that are going to win out. They didn't win out. It's us because we're on the side of the institutions that are selling the stock. This is a great read on this because there's probably every day trading room out there is trying to buy this or bought this here today, but us. What a great read. And we almost got stopped out. And we did. And I knew that if this flew over the high, well then we wouldn't be able to redo it. So we need to get under 27. Big fudge back that the truck had made a killing in this one. Really? You did? Did I say something that made it sound like it was amazing? That made you want to risk a killing? Here we go, Matt. One more push down wherever it goes. I'm going to take it. Let's see if we can get it in our 27 somewhere. No, just lately you're increasing your bets. All right, because I'm trading so well. Melissa's in a good mood and she's doing everything right. So I think I'm going to risk the farm. I'm going to ride it out. Ride it out till she takes her next vacation. All right, here we go, Matt. Here it is. It's rallying. I don't think that's it though, but now we're in a rally. Is anyone in anything else? Let's just wait on it. MCK. MCK set up. Weird, still fine. LBS. Whoa, look at that thing. You could have gotten this here and it did go right down to the first target. That was good. Stop on this was not small either. Look at how this popped over the high. Wow. Took people out and it's breaking again. Now that wasn't easy to do at all. I think we did the easiest one. You could be a lot of this, but I think it makes one more move down. Here, Matt. Well, maybe we should take tomorrow off. I'm like tippy-toeing around my computer now. Tippy-toe. Tippy-toe. Tippy-toe perfection. Jeez. 127.15. We should be good. I think it's raining again. Quite big fudge. Short 100,000 shares so we can get this down. Hurry. Yeah, this is a tough spot here for the spy. The way that we got, how can you, you can't short this though. Tough, tough move to go higher here. We might get some help from the market here into 10 o'clock. Between 9.45 and 10 o'clock, we may get some help with the market here to the downside. Here we go. Under 15, Matt. I'm too relaxed now. I don't want to miss my exit. Come on, come on. All right. Here we go. Matt. Under 15. We'll just, we'll go right down. Come on. Is anyone in anything else? Oh, I just saw an invisible ticket 23. Not in anything else, okay. If I see a good re-entry holler, you're out. You mean you took it out here? Oh, that was fine. Cucon going? Yeah, I just don't want to move off of this because this could go immediately. Cucon was good, but go over Cucon when we're done. All right, I will go, I will move off of this so I can just go. Yeah, Cucon, look at that. Wow. Look at that. And I called an option and then I didn't do it. I didn't do it. I didn't want to be in anything in the downs to the downside in this market.  Who did this? I called an option in this for the option letter. Yep. There you go. Look at that. Wow. You could have even taken more of that yesterday.  And I didn't want to be in anything short overnight with the market, but this was the one to do. Look at that. Who's in it? Anyone? Who's in that Cucon from the letter that I called? Write it in the room. It was an option trade and I didn't do it. I called it for the letter, but I didn't want to be in an overnight to the downside, but it's working. Wow, I can't believe we're still waiting on this. Gala heads in it. Okay, good. Okay, this went to the first target. I didn't get out of any. It looks good, but I didn't get out of any. And now here it's backing up. Time of the day is 9.48. Next drop. I'm definitely getting all out. Now it has to go, it still has to go under 15. Is Gala had the only one that did Cucon? That did the put I called in Cucon? Is he the only one? That's 9.48. Yeah, this is fine. I kind of wish I would have gotten all out of it there because it was the first target and I just don't have any patients. I don't have any patients at all. We did do this every day this week. This just looked great to keep going, but now we have to wait. It'll come back down around, but I don't know what time. Now here we are. We're stuck in it. I just don't have any patients. So some of you did get all out. I didn't. I did this every day this week and got out. I don't know why I didn't. Maybe I'm too tired today. Too relaxed, too tired. I don't know. Now I gotta sit here and wait on it. 926 dollars you're out. Thanks. Have a good day. Okay. You're welcome. Discipline dude got out? Okay. Yeah, I just didn't react fast enough. I thought it was gonna go. Even here I thought. In here I thought. In here I thought it was gonna go. Yeah, we're gonna have to wait. It could be another half an hour. So here's the five minute on this. It's gonna have to reset up on this whole other time frame now. This was the fast exit and I didn't take it. It still looks fine, but you know, I'm a very impatient person. We should have got all out here because this was the first exit. Now we're in it waiting. It's gotta reset up over here. Reset up over here. Susanna got out with 180 bucks. Well, you're making your goal every day with 200. You're doing it. See me tomorrow, Madam President. Okay. Thank you. You're welcome. All right. 49 is another entry. 49 is another entry if you want to take more or cost average your price in or, you know, take it again. Chief was wanting another entry. 49. 49 with the stop has to be the same. Only one that stayed in this. I'm the only one that's still in this. Did everybody get out down here or 27 but me? Maybe I was too tired today. It's a lot of work being president. It's a lot of work being perfect. It's tiring. Cayman dude's still in it. Shara singer still in it. Gala had still in it. Some of you are still in it. Here. Time of the day is 952. You took more? I don't think it hit 49 yet. I said 49. Did it hit 49? I'd wait till it breaks again. This looks exactly the exact same like all the ones we were doing. They go, they break, they drop, they rally back, they reset up and then the second move ends up being Jaimungus. I didn't get that on the one yesterday but it was. Here. There's the entry. There's the ad. Let's go look at the TXT while we're in this because there's nothing we can do now but wait. Who did this fly up today? Look at that. Holy guacamoles. See this one here. Well actually, no, let's go to the one minute. See what this did yesterday and then it did this and then it did this and then it did this and then it collapsed after that move. Do you see that?  So after this backup here went you know and had the Jaimungo move. The move was so big that it reversed then at whatever point it was and the market was very bullish yesterday. I don't think we should lower it. I don't think we should. I mean you could have it anywhere. You could put it back at 95 if you want. You could put it at 2810, you could put it at 2805. I think 2805 is good enough. If you want to put it back to 95 you can. It's going to need the 15 minute now. It's going to need the five minutes. It's going to be the 15 minute.  We could have gotten out of half. It looks fine though. I mean look at this. There's not doing anything wrong. It's just we're taking a while. That's why I just wanted to show you that TXT and see what it did. Here's the five minute right here. There it is on that. Let's just see where this came into. I'm definitely going to get out of this the next drop. I mean I don't care where it goes wherever it goes and just definitely get out. If it goes down in 27 again and it doesn't break it I'm just going to take it because I'm losing patience but it's fine. We just missed the first exit. That's all. Well some of you didn't. Some of you get out.  Here it is Matt. Here let's just pay attention. I just, I want to just pay attention to this so I can get out of it because I'm losing patience. Not that it's doing anything wrong except for taking forever. Okay the five minutes triggered. Now we got to wait for the 15 minute. There's nothing we can do. Obi-Wan Kenobi still in that? Okay you should be having a good week. I called my personal stylist. I love that dress that Ivanka Trump wore and that inauguration that green dress. Well she wore it off when she came off the plane. The dress with the green jacket it was gorgeous. She checked into it as Oscar de la Renta but they made it just for her. You can't buy it. First she's like they're probably sold out and then she checked into it and the designer made it just for her. You can't buy it. I was like oh that color is beautiful and it looks so good on me. I wanted to buy it. It was cut so just amazing. I loved every outfit she wore. Every gown, every suit outfit so pretty. You can google it. Everything she wore was beautiful. She's gorgeous but I love the way she dresses. She dresses very classy. It's very very much my style. I will love a designer to design an outfit for me. Here Matt. Come on. Me too. Oh thank you. Yeah very very. Her children are beautiful. Goodness.  He's so cute. All right come on Matt. 28. Wow look at how that's fighting with itself. I mean there's nothing wrong with this except for we're waiting forever. I don't like to be patient at all. 10 o'clock and we're still in this. I should have got out of it at 27 which was the first target. It's not doing anything wrong but it's still not going down near the low of the day and I'm waiting and I'm waiting and I'm waiting and you know as far as the market goes it shouldn't matter either way but either we go higher today or we just are neutral. I don't think we drop. Who would sell this here? No one. So this needs to get going. Here Matt. Come on. I think it touched 40 but it didn't break it the last time. No. Maybe she'll change the trend in the USA for younger women. Perhaps. People tend to go with stuff they see in magazines that are entertainers for trends. Not business women or social media people I should say. I guess that's it now. All the kids are on social media. Gosh there must be a lot of work to have kids nowadays with social media. I don't have any children but I wonder what it'll be like when I do some day. How do you how do you protect your kids from all the stuff that's on the internet? So much garbage. Here under 40. Here Matt. Here it goes. Yep exactly. Here Matt. Here Matt Matt here's the 15 minute under 16. That's that number 15 that we didn't hit back down the first time. Well we didn't hit the first time. We didn't hit the second time and then I thought we were gonna. I held this too long. We're fine in this now. It looks great but definitely definitely definitely I'm out of this wherever it breaks under the low. Homes report. Is that what's happening right now? While we're gossiping about clothes and babies. While we're talking about fashion and babies. We could talk about food. What else can we talk about? Well we can't talk about anything about this stock or we'll jinx it and I can't look at anything else or I'll miss my exit on this so. Market looks in consolidation. You would take it off a 2720. WFM did that gap today? This doesn't keep going soon. I'm gonna have to get another cup of coffee. WFM did this gap today? No it didn't do anything. What do you want to do with this? I have no read on this whatsoever. Leave it be. When are the earnings out on that? Look this looks great. It's still taking forever. I don't know what you want to do with WFM. I have no read on that at all. 2-8. That's forever from now. Look at the stock though. Look it's really it wants to go down. It's trying to go down but it's not yet. I mean look at this here. It's triggered down the 1, the 2, the 5. It's setting up to trigger the 15 but hasn't yet. Look at it. It wants to sell off so badly. It's holding, holding the resistance, holding the gap down but we're still not through the low. It feels a little bit forever. It's only been you know less than 30 minutes but but look it's been back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. I mean it's it look at the range it's traded in. One of these one of these seconds or one of these minutes it's gonna break and it's gonna break hopefully in our direction I think but look at the range. The range is so tight. It's been it's been trading in like a tight range in this 30, 40, 50 area. Talk about places to travel to. Cayman dude lives in the Cayman Islands. He wants me to go there. Winter is a good time to travel that's for sure. Greece, are you going there discipline dude? Big fudge is in Vietnam but I think he just just for work. Are you went there was awesome? I've never been to Greece. I want to go to Hawaii but I'd have to close the room for like a month because it's like a day to fly and I wouldn't want to go for a week. I'm so dear Hawaii because I'm going to get Hawaii or I'm talking about babies all of the above though.  Look look at the five minute it looks amazing boom let's look at QCon. This was very good. This is very good. Gala had ditties up. I guess he was the only one. Fact of this whoosh today. Oh this thing's just collapsing. Who's still in it with me? Some of you killed it. Some of you get out of it with profit when it hit 27. It looks fine. I can't believe I'm still in it. This is taking my whole life. It's good though. It's fine. It ran all the way up again. This looks exactly like the one from yesterday and the one from the day before and the one from the day before that. And even the day before that on Friday of which all the days before I got out very quickly of the first target today I didn't. I don't know why. I guess I need another cup of coffee. I just thought it would hit 27 collapse but it didn't and it's nothing to do with the market. It just said that was the first target. You're in it. You think it will work? Yes. You got back in it? Oh I didn't know you got out. Still hard but I think if you got out you should have gotten out of 27 because you need to make money every day and every second you're breathing right now. You took profit earlier in 2702 and re-entered at 49. Very good. Once this hits in the 15 minute we're going to lower the stop but not yet. I don't have time to write this or do a motivational lecture. If I do I will. If not I was thinking about this earlier. Kind of what we're talking about earlier in the week. Then I was talking about it yesterday with somebody. Who was it? It was Dwight. I was talking about it with him that the fact he remarked that someone had trouble getting in the room and then I brought it up in the room and I said if you can't figure out getting over getting in the room then how are you going to figure out how to train? You have to be able to overcome obstacles. I was thinking about this. You do have to have a little bit of that in you to be a fighter. If you're a fighter I'm a fighter. I'm a fighter which means that I don't quit. I'll win. When you're a fighter it means you never quit which means you're going to win. You've got to have a little bit of that mentality. If you're a quitter then you probably will quit at any task that's difficult. I'm not saying trading is difficult. If you come and learn it from me it's an easier path but you will have a learning curve. It could be a day. It could be a week. It could be a month. It could be a year. I don't know. I don't know you. But the bottom line is that you've got to have a little bit of that fight in you which is the mentality that you're not going to quit and I definitely have that. I'm a fighter and that means that I never quit. It means I don't give up. I never quit in anything I wanted to do and that means that I always win eventually. It doesn't always happen in the time frame I won. Gosh knows that I could have figured out trading. I wish I would have figured it out much much faster than I did but you know I didn't. No one can predict. If you could go into a future and predict and if there was guarantees you'd be able to predict what would happen to you and then you know then everyone would know. That's not how life works. There are new guarantees because no one can look into the future and see what's going to happen or what. Here Matt. Wow look at this how it's struggling with that number though. Yep how true. Steelheart's out with another profit. Very good. It's a great gap 22. You'll wait all day. Oh there you go. Dubai's is going to wait all day. Well I'm not. I am not going to wait all day. It's already 10-10. Okay my dude took it. He's got to go to work. Here it goes. So everything I said was true. Traders were trying to buy this. Probably bought the dip in here. Didn't get out. Broke the loan. Rebought it at the whole number. You know did people get out here?  This wasn't along and it's not we're in this way to go. We're up but you know obviously I wish it would have gotten out down here and just been done with it a half an hour ago. Quick move happened in a few minutes and I just didn't get out. This looks great and should break the law. Should break the law and be a bigger trade now. You know wasn't planning on holding it for 45 minutes but it's still good. But do you see how the struggle within itself is some people buying it and some people selling it. Some people shorting it and some people going long and it's a struggle within itself. You got to be in the right direction though. Mark it very bullish. All right Sea to Mars is then you did your job today. You made around 200 bucks. 180 dollars. That's your goal every day. You're in. You're out. You're stopped. Ijahn made 900 some dollars. You make your goal. You're done. You make more money if it keeps going. You make more money if it keeps going flowers. If it keeps going down and you're in it short. If you get out at 27 you're up. If it would have dropped here to 26 would you have made more? The answer is yes. The lower the price the more you're up and you're shorting. You wanted to drop. So I thought it was going to keep going here and I was going to make more. It didn't. So then I'm waiting. Obviously I still like it. Now it's going to break probably and go down in here but I really wish that I was not in this still for 45 minutes. It's going to need the 15 minute and it won't go until that happens. And if it doesn't hit here it'll be the next bar. Look at how this is a flat line now. It's a flat flat flat flat flat flat line right here. Look flatness. This is the area. To some it looks like support. To some it looks like resistance. Who's right? The people in charge of the gap. And why? Because the gap rated 22 points. So who's in charge of the gap? The bears. And that's why we're in it. If it didn't rate this high then then the bears wouldn't be in charge. The gap rating tells you who's in charge of the control and the position of the stock. Is it a long or is it a short? That's what it means. What else is going to pay you a thousand dollars for a six hour day? You could become a doctor. A lawyer. You could become a lawyer and charge $1,500 an hour. Of course you don't get all of that. Your firm gets some of it. Let's say you make 60. Let's say you make 70% of that. 70%. Any work eight hours a day? Eight times 1,500. Times 70% is what? Here, let's figure it out. 1,500 times eight hours. Which actually probably worked more than eight hours. That was your billable rate. Times 70%. $8,400 a day. My next life I'm going to be an attorney. All right, here we go. 27, 21. 27, 20. Too much work and stress. Yeah. Actually there are some days that I made $8,000 a day and some of the options. Just not on the day trades. Here, under 21. Come on. Wow, this is a fight to the death. And I just gave a lecture on fighting. It's a fight to the death. I'm going to lower the stop, but I know that if I do, it'll jinx it. I really want to lower the stop to 50. 55-ish. Do we dare? Maybe I just do that and call it a day. I'm going to put the stop at 55. I've had enough. If it takes me out, I'll have a small loss. And if it goes on to work, it'll be a good winner. There. I'm done. 27, 55 for me or bust. Do whatever you want. Some of you are ready out. Some of you retook it. You could keep the stop way up above if you want and be in it all day. That's Dubai's plan of action. Let's look at what's out for tonight while we're waiting in this and falling asleep. Is the 26. Wow. It's February next week.  It's February already. It's almost Valentine's Day. It's ridiculous. Tonight, of course, we have the Google. Tonight is Google. Tonight is, which will, without a doubt, affect the market. E-Trade. Juniper. Clack. Starbucks. We'll have a lot to look at tomorrow here. Tonight's watches. I'll just put these in the room. These are tonight's. Juniper, Starbucks, Google. Although we're not doing anything with Google. Here, this goes. Let's just look at Google. It's so crazy. All right. Ask me any questions. I'm here. I'm going to stay in this with you here to get one more drop down and I'm just going to take it. Ask me questions. You have me now. You could take more here if you want. Here we go. Matt, look. It took so long. 10, 15, 10, 19. Could drop into lunch now. Just drop all the way into 12 o'clock. Gosh, so long. Here it goes. Here it goes, Matt. Here's the 15 number, the next number that we had to get through. Here it's going to do it. Boy, tough one today, people. We did everything right. I just missed the quick exit. There's no free pass. There's no free pass for life, even when you know what you're doing. I know what I'm doing, but there's no free pass. There's never any guarantees. You have to take the money when you're up. There's no free pass and this is what it is. Not in anything. You can't look under crystal ball and see where everything's going to go and have 100% guarantees in everything you do. When people ask me that, I know they're not meant to trade and they'll never be successful in life. You got to want it. You got to believe. You got to understand the way the world works. No one gets a free pass. No one gets a free pass to learn how to train.  You don't get a free pass. You don't deserve it. This is something that you make money very quickly. There isn't anything like it. You could become an attorney and make $1,500 an hour, but you know, someone mentioned it's right. Lots of stress. You work very hard. You go to school for a long long time and it costs you $150 grand to go to school or more than that even now and it's tough. There's so much competition in that industry anyways that if you don't go to a good school, you won't get a good job. People want everything easy. That's not how you become successful and you know, this is very doable. There's nothing wrong with not knowing. There's nothing wrong with the unknown. The unknown might actually be something that's exciting and good. You have to look at risk and not knowing the unknown is something that's exciting. Not something that's scary. I think I do that. I do that with everything in my life. I'm very good at doing that. It's my natural habitat, but it's not most people's. Thank you for my wisdom. You're getting a lot of it today because I'm sitting here for an hour. I'm sitting here since 9.32 or whatever time we're in the street. Geez, Louise. What was the emergency to take this? Clearly there wasn't any now. All right, hurry up, Matt. Target's still the same. 26.50 if it breaks, but you know, we're not there yet. It still didn't get through 15, can you believe it? And it does look like the market is a smidgen, smidgen, smidgen red. A smidgen. Nope, we didn't get under that 15 number yet. Right here. We're back where we were when I thought we were going to go and I didn't get out of it. I was too lackadaisical. Q-Com set up again. This looks great. It's even set up in the 15 minute. You could do Q-Com short. You could just do this right in here. It's not even that far away from the entry. Stops 54.55. You could put Q-Com. This isn't here. What's just going right now? Actually now it is too late, but you could have done this like when I just started talking or you could have been watching this. This will break the load today. $53 in Q-Com. Well, you could still do this here. You could still do this here if you want it. $0.60 or thereabouts. There it goes. Q-Com is a good, good short. I can't believe we're still in this. Is it moving? I think it's stuck, actually. Questions. Classes this weekend, Saturday and Sunday. If you want to retake it, email me. If you're new on a trial, let data sign up this tomorrow. What else do you want to go over? I don't know what we'll get tomorrow. Maybe we'll get Starbucks. What happened with LBS? Let's look. Woo! This collapsed. Look. This was tough. Wow. Look. Second move was the biggest in this one here. Hard. Tough. Tough to do this here, though. Tough to do it after the pop and the rally back. Gap did great well. Not sure how I would have played this. It wasn't my top watch. I rated it. It was a rating. This has gone right to the target. Look at that. We're in a nicer one here. Here's the 15 number, Matt. We played the easiest thing we could today, losing patience, but it was much easier than that thing. If we had done that, we probably would have been either out half, stopped the harass to the half, or I wouldn't have retaken it. I'm not sure what I would have done with that. I don't even know. That LBS was hard. The class is swoosh. How this is going? This is something I'm probably going to send an email out to everyone. What I would like from everyone, and this is the regular people, I would like more stories of good stories from students in an email. Tell me about something. Write it. Write it. Your experience. Something you're doing good. Money you made. A good day. You had a good trade. You had a good experience. Something. People know that I can do this. I want to hear more about students experiences. You people less about me. I do all these emails and say all my trades. I want to hear how much money you made as a person, as a student. Your experience. Here, look, Matt. I would like that to be more, especially with this project I'm working on. I don't want it to be all about me. I want it to be about other people too. This weekend is a golden gap class, gee. So if something good happens to you, if you have a good day, if you make money, if you learn something, if you, something, anything, anything positive, I want positive stuff. Email to me and writing to help other people, whether I put it on the website or put it in email or use the story to tell someone. It helps other people. Know that they can do it, not just I can do it, that other regular people can do it. This is ridiculous now, though. I'm almost inclined to remove this stop again. I just can't believe how long this is taking. I definitely will put the stop at 55 now. If you didn't, when I did, I would do it now. This is too close to the low not to go. It should break it very, very quickly. I would definitely put the stop at 55. And, and, and in the market is a little bit red. So I would do that. Did anyone do Q-come? Here, Matt, I have to wait another 45 minutes to get 15 more cents out of this. I'm just going to take it. This, I don't think it's moving. I think it's stuck. I think it's, I think it's frozen. I think, I think it's halted. I think it's halted. I think Google gaps up. I don't know. I don't want to do anything in it, but I think it gaps up. That's my two cents. It's completely unplayable. You can't possibly do anything with this, but I think it gaps up. What can you do? I've looked at every number. Nothing makes sense. And I don't really know what it's going to do, but my instinct says it gaps up. My instinct says that Google gaps up and the market finally hits over in the spy 230. An accused ready to get over 125, which was the next target. And I think this is halted. It's going to drop soon, patient. Anyone can know, but you have to tell Kathy that you're, you're, you're healthy. You said you were in the hospital and Kathy thought something was wrong with you. She's like, one of your students is in the hospital. I'm like, no, he's fine. Here, there it goes. Come on. Here, Matt.  Disablin dude killed it. It's finally going to go unbelievably long. Look at the volume in it. Look at the volume in it. It's hardly moving. Slow sell off here in this. It's just taking all my energy, way to exercise now. It's just taking energy to sit here and watch it. Here, Matt. Here it goes. Here it goes. You're welcome, ranch trader. You got to go. They'll check my leaders. You had those.  You don't have to do anything else. You're out. You are out twice. So that was good for you. 2710. Here's my plan of action. I'm not letting this get over any number at all. Here, here it goes. Here it goes. Matt. Beautiful. Very long trade. Very long trade. Let's see where it goes under the whole, under the whole number.  Where did it touch? 06. My hand is on the button, people. I'm completely lost patience. I'm not letting this bounce over 2710. So I'm just telling you. In fact, let's just blow it up. Gosh, you can barely see the bars. I know this is going to go. I just don't have any patience anymore. Here, come on. Here it goes. Matt. You could put a stop at 2715 if you want. You could take it out now. You could wade. You could be in it all daily, do bots.  This is really going to sell off. I can tell by the way that it's acting. I just don't have the patience. And the last hour that we've been in this, it's, it struggled with the area. It's going to break it. It's going to, it's going to just have a very hard sell off. It hardly looks like it's even moving even still even now. People run this long with stop under the low. Here, I'm out. I'm out. I took it. I'm done. I can't, I can't, I'm not going to let it pop over 2710. I'm done. I don't have any more patience. It looks great though. Here, it could rally again and then still drop. I'm done. Here, look, perfect. It's going to break. It's beautiful. It's fabulous. It's amazing. It could take till noon and I don't have the patience anymore. So do whatever you want to do. Put the stop over 2755. I'm out. Got down here within five cents. Didn't go. Doesn't mean it's not going to. It's amazing. It's going to break, but you know, you could be in this till noon. And I wasn't going to hold it over 10. Any questions? What are you people doing? Tell me what you're doing with it. Those of you that are still in it, I took it. I couldn't be in it any further. I gave it all the way down. I would have had the same exit in the morning. Any questions? Gala, it's still in it. Fine. Do you want me to hold it? Fine. Jewary's in it. Still in it. Fine. Yeah, if you can be patient and sit and watch and wait it, you're good. You bod is going to wait till noon. Fine. I would just move the stop to 55. That's the only advice I can give you. Should not go anywhere near there, but it could back up to 20, 25 ish, something like that.  Here it could go right now. All right. Good day, people. Good day. We'll just continue the tradition here tomorrow. All right. Koala bears out half. Okay. You're welcome. Here. It could go right now. Look at this. It's going to try. It's at 09 again. You can't wait. Okay. We'll see what we got. All right. Have a good day, everyone. I'll see you tomorrow morning. You're welcome.


Welcome to session 2 of Dewey Decimal Classification. As I said, let's see, let me go over the agenda for the class in general. Last week we talked about Dewey Decimal Classification in general and notes and the concepts of subjects versus disciplines and manuals, the manual to help you out when you're making decisions about numbers and we went over web Dewey. Today we'll be talking more about subjects versus disciplines and we will get into number building with table 1 and then we'll talk about the rest of the tables next week. But before I do any of that, we're going to go over assignment 1. So I will jump out here and go over to the answer sheet and let me make this a little bit bigger. And as we go along, I'll go through and walk through web Dewey and tell you how I would answer these questions. If you are using an older version of Dewey, yours may be slightly different, but hopefully you can see where mine differ from yours. As we go along, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to jump in. Either type them in the question box or let me know in the question box that you would like to be unmuted and I can do that and you can ask a question away through the microphone. Okay, so the first one was Odds on, Bedding at the Horse Track. And let me get Dewey up over here. And remember I think the best way to go about looking at these things is to browse and browse the relative index. There are a couple ways you could go about looking for this one. You might want to type in bedding and see what comes up for that one. So it's possible, it's undergambling, you might want to see that. You know, and as I was going along, I would probably, you know, make notes of the possible answers. Check your collection to see where similar items or shells. Let's go to horse racing and see what happens there. Again, make sure you're in the relative index. One thing that kind of annoys me about WebDewey is that every time you go back to browse it resets to Dewey numbers. So make sure to check that relative index radio button there. And we'll check out the number for horse racing 798.4. And it turns out that there is a number just for bedding on horse racing. And if you click on that, you'll see that they're, you know, if we knew it was just about the United States and you're using full Dewey, you could get really, really specific. But our book doesn't say it's about United States. So I would go with 798.401 for this one. Did anybody have any questions about that one? Okay, we'll go on to the next one then. Pre-adults developmental psychology. And it says that it covers age groups from birth to 18 and pretty equal treatment of all age groups. So let's go back to WebDewey. Again, I would browse the relative index and I would just put in developmental psychology. Again, we're working purely off of titles here in real world. You would look at titles. You would look at subject headings. You would, you know, browse the table of contents, see what the book is about. You know, obviously you can always judge what the book is about by the title, but we are kind of working in an artificial situation here. So the number for developmental psychology is 155. And there are a lot of notes about this one, but the actual numbers are down here. And remember we're dealing with children here. We're dealing with groups from birth to 18. So I think that psychology of specific ages is a good place to look. I would click on these numbers to get more details. And we see that we have child psychology, which says through age 11, which covers part of our book here. And then we have psychology of young people 12 to 20, which covers the other part because this one goes up to 18. It says they're treated equally. So in this case you would apply the rule of first of two and you would go with the one that comes first in the schedule. So my answer to this one is 155.4. Any questions about that one? Okay. These do get a little bit more difficult as we go along. So those two are pretty straightforward. Next one we have is current religions of the Middle East and tells us that it discusses Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism. It doesn't specifically say how much of the book is devoted to each. I think unless it says otherwise you can generally assume that it is equal treatment. So we will go with that one. So remember if they're all treated equally, most likely we're going to be applying the rule of three, which means we'll probably want to assign a number that includes all of these. So we might need to go up the hierarchy to one level of more general numbers. So anyway, we'll start our search. Let's just start with the first religion mentioned. We'll find numbers for all three of them. So we browse the relative index and type in Islam. And that takes us to 297. At this point I would probably just jot down on a piece of paper or something the number for this one because we're going to look up all three. And so the next one was Hinduism. And we're browsing the relative index. And that number is 294.5. And then the last one is Judaism. So we'll browse for that one as well. And that one is at 296. And so we see that these are all in the 290s, and they're all equal level of the hierarchy. So if we go up one level in the hierarchy to 290, that includes all of them. So applying the rule of three because there's equal treatment, this book should be classed at 290. I should also mention that one of the reasons that we went with the rule of three there because there weren't any notes in the schedules telling us to do otherwise. This is a straight up application of the rule of three. Okay, I'm seeing some questions coming in. Why isn't it about the Middle East and not religion? And someone else asked, do you want to apply the geographic area from table two? So we're getting some questions as to whether or not we need to emphasize the aspect of the Middle East. And to that one, I would say, yes, probably in real life you would. Since we haven't discussed the tables yet, I wasn't expecting anyone to apply the geographic subdivision, but probably, and again, it would depend on the actually having the book in hand to really decide whether you would care more about the fact that it's a book about religions or whether you would care more about the fact that it's a book about the Middle East and it's hard to say from just the title. But yes, probably to actually catalog the book, I would probably put 290 and then add a geographic subdivision to indicate the Middle East, which we will talk about more next week when we talk about table two. We're seeing another question come in of alternative numbers. Someone asked, why not 291.656? Let me look that one up in the schedule. In this most recent addition, 291 is no longer a valid number. So if you have addition 21 or older, 291 may be an option. I don't know exactly what that used to be used for. So that may have been an option in the past, but apparently that is an unassigned number currently. It says it's relocated to 200. So numbers that used to be here in 291 are now under 200, which actually segues nicely into the next question, which is why not 200.9? And I'm being told that 291 was comparative religion, and it is now lumped into religion in 200. And the other question is why not 200.9, which is 200 for religion, historical, geographic, or person's treatment. I suppose that could be an option. I guess I would say personally I would go with 290 rather than 200.9 because we are focusing on three specific religions, not any religion that ever existed in the Middle East. And so I would want to be a little bit more specific and go with the most specific number that includes Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism. So that's the judgment call that I would make. Does that answer everyone's questions? Great. Those are all excellent questions. And I got a lot of comments from people who were sending their assignments in about, well, this all looked a lot easier when we were talking about it last week, and then you actually get into applying it and you see that you make decisions like this. And so, like I said, sometimes classification numbers are really more of an art than a science. The next item is successful second grade readers. And we are told it contains equal information on whole language approach to reading, oral reading, and evaluating reading skills. Again, equal information. So each topic of these three contains is treated about equally. So we're thinking we might be in a rule of three situation here where you go with the number that contains all of them. But again, you'll have to check the schedules for notes that may tell you to do differently. So let's look up these three topics. We will start by browsing the relative index for whole language. And this was about second grade, so we will go with primary education. And again, look at these various options. There's one for language arts. This one actually deals with reading. So we want to make sure we're dealing with whole language approach, the correct age group, primary, and the correct subject matter, reading. And the number for this one is 372.475. Again, I would write this one down while you look up the other ones. The other topics, the next one is oral reading. And again, we want to deal with primary education. And so that is 372.452. So it looks like we're on track. The class is all under 372, perhaps. And the next one is, let me keep this topic, evaluating reading skills. This may be a little bit trickier to find in the relative index. I'm not sure if this is the exact language that is used or not. So we might have to try some things. No match in here. Let's perhaps try evaluation of reading. And again, this is just kind of a real-life example of how you may have to try some different searches to kind of get into the schedules. You could try going into reading and just kind of browsing around to see if there's anything else. Reading primary education looks like what we were dealing with. And we see that evaluation of reading skills is a number, which makes me wonder why they didn't come up in the relative index. But anyway, the number is 372.48. So we would maybe think that we would class this with 372 because that includes all of these numbers. However, remember, it is important to look for notes that tell you to do otherwise. So we look at the notes for 372.48. And then so all of these actually are in 372.4. So that would be our thought using the rule of three that we might class them in 372.4. However, there's this note under 372.4 that you might have missed that says, unless other instructions are given, class the subjects with two or more subdivisions of 372.4 in the number coming last. So instead of doing one level up in the hierarchy to a number that includes all of them, this one specifically tells you to go with the number that comes last. So in this case, that would be 372.48, the number for evaluation of reading skills. So that is my answer to this one, 372.48. Any questions on that one? I know it's a little bit convoluted. Okay, the next one is testing a different rule for deciding between two subjects. This title is called the mathematical transformation of mapmaking. So it's discussing the influence of mathematical theory on current cartographic practices. So you may think you're deciding between classing this with math and classing it with mapmaking. But remember, according to the rule of application, you want to class it with whatever is being acted on. So we're talking about the influence of math on cartographic practices on mapmaking. So mapmaking is the thing that's being acted on. Therefore it is what we class this with. So I would look that one up in the relative index. And again, you may need to try different versions. There is no match for mapmaking. So perhaps cartography is the way to go. And that one does have a number. And it is classed at 526. And we don't have really any information to know if this is more specific than that at all. But I would go ahead and put that at 526. Any questions about that one? Let's see if somebody is saying they went with 526.8 map projections. Huh, mathematical geography. You know, this is probably hard to make a call on this one without having an actual book in front of us. From the title, I don't necessarily know the difference between mapmaking and map projections. So I think given what we know, I would still stick with 526. We have another question about 526.092. And that is for cartographers. I guess, again, hard to tell without having an actual book. But given what we know from the title, I would think that this book refers more to the process of cartography and mapmaking rather than the people who do it. So again, judgment call perhaps. And of course, take into account where other similar books are in your collection. But I would class this more with the process of cartography rather than the cartographers, the people who do it. Okay, the last one is probably the trickiest one on this assignment. Drawing rooms, a comparison of Victorian paintings from England and America. So what I would take away from that is that we're dealing with painting as our subject. And so I would start by browsing for painting in the relative index. And it seems to me that we're dealing with painting as art rather than painting as a building or decorative arts, I suppose. Because it does say drawing rooms, let's see. Painting is art, I guess. Yeah, I think they're painting pictures of drawing rooms, I assume. And we have two kind of options here. We have the fact that it's about a particular time period, the Victorian period. And then we also have the geographic aspect. It's about Britain and North America with emphasis on Britain. We're told that it emphasizes Britain a little bit more. And so, again, sometimes you just have to kind of browse around the schedules. But when you look for painting at 750, you see that 759 is the number for both history and geographic treatment. So both of the options here are covered. And again, here's the decision we have to make between periods of development and geographic treatment. So we're told that its emphasis is more on Britain than North America. So I would maybe start by looking at geographic treatments. You'll see the numbers for North America, 759.1. And then Europe is broken down between 759.2 to 759.8. Again, remember to read your notes. I know it's easy to kind of just gloss over and not think about it, but obviously if you're copycataloguing, you won't have to make decisions like this too often. But it's good to know how these numbers are built. And so we're looking at the geographic treatment. And there is a note. The ultimate note here was class Western paintings of one or two specific periods in 759.02 to 759.07. So that's telling us that if it doesn't cover a wide range of time periods, if it's basically focusing on one time period, then we should prioritize the time period over the geography of it. So I would go back to the periods of development. And we're looking at the Victorian period, which is roughly the 1800s. So I would class this at 759.05. I know that was probably the most convoluted one we had dealt with here. Does anybody have any questions about that one or other numbers that they chose? And we have someone saying they chose 759.0542. And so you would be assuming that this painting, our book talks about impressionist painting. I don't see that we are given that information necessarily. Again, if we had the book in front of us, we might know that. But I would say from what we are looking at here, the most specific we can get is 759.05. If you had the book in front of you and it was about a particular type of painting like impressionism, and if you thought it would be of service to your users to put all the books about that type of painting together, then you could go ahead and extend the number. But I think given what we know, 759.05 is as specific as we can get. Are there any other questions about the assignment before we go on to the new content for this week? Okay, well if you think of any, feel free to send them later on or email me or call me. We'll jump back into our slideshow here. Again, we are talking about session two. We'll talk more about subjects versus discipline and a little bit of number building. Last week we talked about how to deal with more than one subject in the same discipline. So things like first of two, rule of three, fuller treatment, rule of application, things like that. Now we're going to look at one or more subjects in more than one discipline. So remember we talked about subjects versus disciplines and how subjects are particular topics, and disciplines are sort of fields of study or ways of looking at a topic. And the same topic could be in more than one discipline. I think the example I used last week was that if you had a book about dogs, it could be from sort of a, here's how to raise a pet dog approach, which would probably be in the discipline of what do we call animal husbandry. But if it was more about the biology of dogs, then that might go in the discipline of biology. So there are a few different things you can do to decide when you have either one subject that could fit into multiple disciplines or multiple subjects in more than one discipline. Sometimes you are given an interdisciplinary number. Do we have built into it these things called interdisciplinary number where basically the decision is made for you. You'll see notes that tell you class interdisciplinary works about such and such under this number. If that is not provided, which it isn't always, then you should go with the discipline given, full as treatment. And the other option after that is if you really can't pin this down to one particular discipline, you can class it in the main class, the 000 class, computers information in general works. Or if none of these work, you can also use basically the same instructions from more than one subject in the same discipline, things like the rule of fuller treatment, the rule of three, the rule of application, those also apply as well. So first we'll look at interdisciplinary numbers. They are provided in the relative index. Sometimes they are just noted in the schedules. Like I said, there will be a note that says class interdisciplinary works with this number. Do not use if the work does not contain significant material within the discipline of the interdisciplinary number. Let me explain that a little bit. How interdisciplinary numbers work is that basically the judgment call is made for you. One or the other disciplines is chosen. It's not a completely new number. It goes with either biology or animal husbandry. So if you had a book that covered both the biology of dogs, plus some information about having a pet dog, if it only had a little bit about biology and it was mostly about taking care of a pet, you probably wouldn't want to put it in the biology part even if that was designated the interdisciplinary number. So this will probably make more sense when we look at an example. Let's say we have this book called Raising the Bar, Improving Competition Success for Professional Lifters through Weight Training for Fitness. So it has information about weightlifting as a competition as well as weightlifting for fitness. So those are two different ways of approaching the topic, the subject of weightlifting. Now if you were looking at the relative index in the print version of Dewey, they would be given with unindented headings in the print versions when there was multiple indented headings. So if you were browsing through the relative index and you looked up weightlifting and you saw the unindented heading for weightlifting had a number, and then there were the two aspects, physical fitness and then competition and sports. This one up here is the interdisciplinary number. It's not indented. And as you can see, like I said, it's a judgment call. They chose between the 796 number and the 613 number and said that any books about both of these go up here at 613. In Web Dewey, these qualifications will come after the numbers and so the one that doesn't have a qualification is the interdisciplinary number. So basically, you know, it's the same thing but instead of the systems of indents, they just have anything that has a qualification is a number in one discipline and then the interdisciplinary number is up here. So you'll see when interdisciplinary numbers appear in the relative index, they are generally also accompanied by notes actual in the schedules. If you click into the schedule and go to that interdisciplinary number, you will see a note that says, class here, interdisciplinary works. And it also redirects you to the other one. So if you only have a book about sports, weightlifting, bodybuilding as a sport, you would go to 796.41. And so here's that number for 796.41 and it doesn't say anything about it. It does tell you that weightlifting for fitness is relocated here. So it will kind of again give you the option to jump between the two disciplines and decide which number is best for you. So because this subject has an interdisciplinary number, we would go ahead and class this one with the interdisciplinary number because it has more than one discipline. Sometimes when you look up the number in the relative index, it may not be clear which one is the interdisciplinary number, but there may still be a note in the schedule. So be sure to look for that if you're trying to decide between disciplines. Here is another book called Striking Style, and it's called Costume Jewelry in the Last Century, Make Your Own. It discusses mass production of costume jewelry in the 20th century and shows how to handcraft jewelry in the same style. So two different disciplines here are sort of the historical approach of talking about mass production of costume jewelry and then showing about hand crafting costume jewelry. So it's approaching the subject of top costume jewelry from two different disciplines of mass production and handcrafts. So if you look up, and again this is the type of most things where you may want to, you know, look up a few different phrases in the relative index. You might look under costume jewelry or just jewelry, where you'll probably most successful would be with jewelry making. And so we have one for costume jewelry and costume jewelry handicrafts. And it doesn't really say which one is an interdisciplinary number, so you'll have to go look in the schedules. I don't know why there's this inconsistency in Dewey and I haven't put all the interdisciplinary numbers in the relative index, but that is the way it is. So if we just looked up jewelry, we would end up at 391.7 and it would say interdisciplinary works on jewelry are here. But jewelry making is at 739.27 and really that's what this book deals with, either commercial mass production making of jewelry or individual handcraft making of jewelry. So as you see here, jewelry making is here. It's under arts and recreation, is a larger category here. And we are told with the note here, class here interdisciplinary works on making fine and costume jewelry. So I would say there's a good chance this is going to be where we'll end up because we know we have an interdisciplinary work and we know it's about making costume jewelry. But you'll notice there's a note here about making handcrafted costume jewelry at 745.5942. And if we look at that other number that we saw in the relative index for kind of the manufacturer of commercially made costume jewelry, we have 682.1. Handcrafted costume jewelry, again, we're given that number. Interdisciplinary works on making jewelry, interdisciplinary works on costume jewelry. And the heading of costume jewelry itself also has some notes. Again, it's going to be kind of roundabout. I would go with 688.2. Let's go back and look at those schedules again here. Because this one has the note, interdisciplinary work on making costume jewelry, and that's the most specific. We don't, you know, it could be seen as an interdisciplinary work on costume jewelry or an interdisciplinary work on making jewelry, but really it's about making costume jewelry. So that is why I would go with 682.88.2. Questions about that one? So if you are not given any interdisciplinary numbers, either in the relative index or in the schedules, then you just go with the discipline given fullest treatment. And this is basically just what we were dealing with when we were deciding between two subjects in the same discipline. Just go whichever one has the most pages about it, the bigger chunk of the book. So here's an example. We have a book called Fighting for Home Birth. It discusses the Nebraska legal stance in regard to midwifery, only 20 pages, childbirth at home, 25 pages, and the practice of midwifery, you know, the medical practice of it, people who are midwifes. And that gets 45 pages, that has the most. So if you looked up medical law, which is probably where the legal stance recording in regard to midwifery is, that's what I would recommend. I'm going to kind of skip some of the stages of looking things up in the relative index here, because I think we all have that to process down pretty well. Medical law would go in 344.041. It's under the discipline of law. Birth customs is 392.12. And if you looked up midwifery in the relative index, because of this note down here, it should be directed to obstetrics. So those are the three options. 618.2 then is our third option. And because midwifery has the most coverage, 45 pages, I would class it with obstetrics in 618.2. There is always an option to class it with the 0000 class, the main class, that's kind of for general works. You probably won't see this very often. I think 99% of the time you should be able to decide that it goes somewhere else in the schedule. But I just wanted to mention that it is also an option. You'll see it probably so rarely that I'm not even going to go through an example of it. And then like I said, if none of these other things apply, if there's no interdisciplinary number, there's no notes telling you where to put interdisciplinary topics. If they all have roughly the same treatment, then you follow the instructions for more than one subject in the same discipline. So fuller treatment, we already kind of discussed. First of two rule, rule of three, rule of zero and rule of application. All those things we talked about last week, you can also use them to decide between subjects in different disciplines. Okay, the next thing we're going to talk about just briefly is the table of last resort. I just have to say I love that name. I love dramatic. The table of last resort. But as the name indicates, you really only use this as a last resort when you have no other way of deciding between two numbers that seem to be applicable. Duee, instructions, the introduction tell you to use it with caution. Consider the intent of the author. A lot of times when the schedule tells you which number to use, it's based on this table, so you won't necessarily have to worry about applying this table on your own. So I just wanted to mention it, but don't worry about it too much. Most of the time, if you need to apply the table of last resort, that number will be built for you in the schedules. But this is kind of the order of numbers to use. If you're deciding between something that is a kind of thing versus the materials from which a thing is made, you go with a kind of thing. Basically, you just go in order of this table. It's a table of preference. Let me show you an example of what I mean by sometimes these are built into the schedule. For example, if you had a book about embroidered rugs, you would class it with a number for rugs rather than the number of embroidery because a rug is a kind of thing, and embroidery is a process which comes later in the table of last resort. And so the notes tell you to do this. There's a table of preference kind of built into the rugs here. So again, you shouldn't have to use the table of last resort too much, but it's there and dewy, and it sort of underlies a lot of the already built numbers. Any questions about the table of last resort or the rest of the instructions for classifying with the DDC part of the introduction? Okay, the last thing we're going to talk about today is number building, or what you will sometimes hear called subdivisions. You also will hear this referred to as numbers from the tables. The tables are sort of an auxiliary part of dewy that let you build longer numbers than what is just in the schedules. Basically, a number building is used to further a group, like with like, to be more specific in your classification. It helps organize a large number of items within a topic. So if you have a book about dogs and you want to keep the encyclopedias about dogs separate from the general books about dogs, you could add a subdivision that will allow you to do that. Similarly, you can use it to define more facets of an item, like we saw with one of the items in our assignment. You can add a subdivision to specify that you're talking about religions of the Middle East rather than just religions in general. Like I said, you use the tables to build the numbers. In a bridge, dewy, four tables are used. In full dewy, six tables are used. We are just going to talk about the first four. Even though your web dewy has access to full dewy, we are just going to talk about the first four for the sake of time. Subdivisions are optional. You don't have to add subdivisions. They are obviously more useful for larger collections when you have a lot of books about dogs. It may be more useful to pull out the encyclopedias and group them all together, or if you have a lot of cookbooks, it may be useful to specify the country whose food is being cooked in each of those cookbooks, whereas in a smaller collection where you only have five cookbooks, you may not need to use subdivisions. Again, they are recommended for a large number of items within a specific topic, but they're not required to be used. It's a judgment call as to what will serve the audience best. Here are the types of facets defined by subdivisions in the tables. Sometimes they will specify the format, a dictionary, a serial, a catalog, an encyclopedia, things like that. Sometimes we'll talk about the approach or the viewpoint of the author, so a history of, I don't know, say knitting rather than just instructions on how to knit. Philosophy, a criticism of something, it might reflect that a book treats a certain subject from the aspect of a particular group of people. Something relating just to women or just a gifted person or just a children, something like that. A big use of the tables is for location. So if you have a geographical aspect of your item that you want to bring out, you can do that using number building with subdivisions of tables. A literary form can be specified using the tables, so poetry or drama, for example, and different uses of language, so grammar or etymology, things like that, those can also come from the tables. To get to the tables in WebDewey, when you're on the main search screen, when you first log in, the tables are down here. If you click on tables, when you click on that, you will get a list of all the tables. Like I said, there are six of them, but we are just going to talk about the first four and only table one today. We're going to talk about the other three next week. Table one has a lot of the facets that I was just talking about. Table one is known as the standard subdivisions. When you see something in the Dewey schedule that tells you add standard subdivisions, that means numbers from table one. These can be used, applied to basically any number in all Dewey. Anything could be subdivided by numbers from table one. They have subdivisions for format. Like I said, dictionary, serial, catalog, the approach or viewpoint of the author, specific groups of people, and specific locations. If you're dealing with a specific location, you actually use table one in conjunction with table two. We'll see that more next week. So here are the standard subdivisions in table one. If you have a book and it is an encyclopedia of dogs, I'll keep using that, then you will add 0, 3 to whatever number you have for dogs. If you have a book and it's about the history of dogs, let's say, you would add 0, 9. And some of these have further subdivisions under them. Some of them, that number is basically it. For example, with 0, 3, if you have a dictionary or encyclopedia, you add a 0, 3 and that's it. But there are some that could be subdivided further. Before I go into that more, there is a table of preference under table one that tells you the order in which you should choose subdivisions if more than one could apply. You usually can only use one subdivision unless the instructions tell you differently. So let's see, if you, for example, had a book that was let's see here. Considered to be a biography, but it was of a particular group of people because biography comes first in the table of preference, you would add 0, 9, 2 to your number. Like I said, some of these can be subdivided. For example, if you click on 0, 2 in the table, you'll see that miscellaneous as you might expect refers to a whole range of things. So how do you use the numbers from table one? Well, they may be added directly from table one at any time, basically to any number. The schedules don't have to say that it's okay. But there are some cases where the schedules forbid it. They say don't use standard subdivisions with this number. Or sometimes they just restrict it, say, only use standard subdivisions for this particular aspect of this topic. Or sometimes it will be redundant. Sometimes the numbers are basically already built for you. If there's already a number that exists for an encyclopedia of dogs, you're not going to add the number again. Let's look at some examples of this. For example, in this case, the use of the standard subdivision 0, 2, 8 is forbidden with square brackets. If I haven't already explicitly said that, I should say that anytime you see a number in square brackets that means don't use this. And the use of the subdivision is forbidden with the brackets and with a note because it would be redundant. 0, 2, 8 is the subdivision for techniques and procedures, apparatus, equipment, and material. And that is already basically exactly what exists in 522. So that would be absolutely redundant to use that subdivision in that case. In this case, there is a Dewey number at 153.3 that encompasses imagination, imagery, and creativity, all three, which are similar but not totally identical concepts. And in this case, it tells you you can use the standard subdivisions from Table 1 if you have a book about all three of these together or for imagination alone. But if you had a book that was just about creativity and a book that was just about imagery, you would not be allowed to use the standard subdivisions. Sometimes, like I said, the number is already built into the base number. So pay attention to that. If we're talking about philosophy, the number 103 already stands for dictionaries and psychopedias and concordances of philosophy, so don't add 0.03 to it. 103.03 would be redundant. Any questions about that so far? Because it's going to get even a little bit more complicated here. Okay. So once you've got the basic concept of subdivisions down, usually you add them as is from the table. If you had the subdivision 03 for a dictionary, man, let's say you had the doing number 692, which I don't even know what that is, but whatever it is, if you had a dictionary about it, your number for that would be 692.03. However, there are some variations. Sometimes they tell you to drop the leading 0, so in that case it would be 692.3 if instructions indicating that were given at 692. Or you sometimes might be told to add an extra 0. So it would be 692.003 if instructions were given indicating that. So here's an example of the first one where basically it's added just as it is in the table. But then we have an encyclopedia of fruit. It explores many varieties of fruits. They're agricultural development and history and where and how they are currently grown. Again, we're kind of skipping the steps of looking it up in the relative index here, but if we arrive at orchard fruits and forestry in 634, this note tells us standard subdivisions are added for orchards, fruits and forestry together, for orchards alone or for fruits alone. So we are talking about fruits alone, so it's okay to use the standard subdivisions. So we want to find a subdivision that tells us this is an encyclopedia. But first let's just write down our base number 634. Then we go to table 1 and we see that 0.3 is the number to add for dictionaries, encyclopedias and concordances. So our full number for this one would be 634.03. And that keeps the encyclopedias of fruit classified away from the general books about fruit. So if you think that would be useful to your patrons, go ahead and add that subdivision. The next option is sometimes instructions will be given that tell you to drop the lead 0s when you're adding your subdivisions. So let's say we have a yearbook of chemistry. So yearbook indicates to me that this is a serial publication, it comes out every year. I wanted to kind of show you how this looks in the print version because it's a little bit clearer there than it is in WebJewy, but I'll show you how it looks in WebJewy as well. If you look up the number for chemistry, it's 540, chemistry and allied sciences. And you'll notice that there's a note telling you the standard subdivisions are 540.1 to 540.9. This is different than what just adding them from the table would result in. If you added them from the table as is, it would be 540.01 to 540.09. So note that the summary tells you if you do anything different with the standard subdivisions. In WebJewy, this looks a little bit different. It's not quite as straightforward. I'm not sure what the reason for this is. Oops, we went forward here. When you end up at 540 for chemistry and allied sciences, you'll notice that instead of just saying the standard subdivisions are at 540.1 to 540.9, it gives you examples of some of them. 540.1 is philosophy and theory. 540.9 is chemistry. The history of chemistry. Education and research are at 540.7. You just kind of have to know that these phrases sound familiar. They are from the standard subdivisions. Again, not the most straightforward thing, but just something to look at. If you've been classifying with WebJewy for a while, you will get used to the fact that 0.1 is philosophy and theory. It's dictionary and psychopedia. These things will start looking familiar to you, and that should be a sign to you that yes, you can use standard subdivisions with this number, but you use them a little bit differently than what you were looking at. What you would do if you were just adding them straight from the table. That's right down our base number. We know it's going to be at 540. We go to the table 1. This is a serial publication. We are going to add 0.5. Again, there's no further subdivisions, so we know that 0.5 would be what we would add normally, but since the directions tell us otherwise, we are just adding 540.5. We're dropping that 0. You can also have kind of the opposite situation where sometimes you add an extra 0. Again, this will appear in the schedules. Again, in the print version, it would probably just appear in the summary at the top, and it would say 0.009 is the standard subdivisions. With WebDoE, again, it's a little bit trickier. If we had a book about small firearms, let me go back here for a second. We wanted to add a subdivision standard subdivision to it. Let's say it was about philosophy of firearms, or it was a dictionary, or something like that. You'll notice that just again, some of the examples of the standard subdivisions are given. The first two are broken out, and then we could get down here to 0.003 to 0.009 for the rest of the standard subdivisions. That just pointed out to you that if we had a serial publication about small firearms, it would be 683.4005 rather than just 0.5. Look for patterns when you're looking at the schedules for DoE. When it tells you if you can use standard subdivisions. Sometimes you might have a book that could conceivably use two standard subdivisions. You might have a periodical that's also encyclopedia or a history book that's also an atlas, things like that. Remember that table of preference that was under Table 1? Use that table of preference to figure out which one to use. Usually 99% of the time you only use one standard subdivision unless the schedule say that for a particular number you can add more than one. Let's say we had that serial publication that's also encyclopedia. Let's see here. They're both kind of down at the bottom of the list. Serials are here and dictionaries and encyclopedias are here. It just barely edited it out. If you had a serial publication that was also encyclopedia and you wanted to add a standard subdivision to help your users find a particular type the table of preference would tell you to go with the number for encyclopedias. Any questions about Table 1? We've got plenty of time left. If you have questions about last week's assignment or anything we talked about today speaking of the assignments this week's assignment is posted at the course web page which is at the URL there. Again, it's a Word document which you can download and then email to me. It's due by 8am next week. Let's see. Oh good, we have a question coming in. What if the number already has a decimal on it? Like 432.3. If it was specifically a .3 I would look closely at it to make sure it wasn't already reflecting the fact that it's a dictionary or encyclopedia but generally any other number you still go ahead and add the subdivision on. Let me jump out here I'll pull up a Word document so we can do some examples. If we had that 432 and we were sure that it wasn't already reflecting the fact that it was encyclopedia or if there was another feature let's say we had this number and then we had a serial publication about whatever this topic is. We wanted to add 05 from the table. You can add numbers either before the decimal point or after the decimal point. Or if you just add 432 so it wasn't as specific as the .3 then you add the subdivision after the decimal point. It doesn't matter what your number is already built out to. If you had 432.45 and then you wanted to reflect the fact that it was a serial you could still add that 05 on to that. This is how the numbers start to get pretty long. Does that answer your question? Cool. Any other questions? Our next session will be next week from 10 o'clock to roughly 11 30. Again we'll be going over the assignment for the first half hour so we'll talk about assignment 2 then we'll talk about we'll continue on with table 1 a little bit we'll talk more about that specifically about the 09 subdivision and how it relates to table 2 and then we'll talk about tables 2, 3 and 4. There will be an assignment number 3. We obviously won't have a in-person class session to go through it but I will post answers to the course web page after the fact. So if anybody has any questions now is the time to answer them and if not if you have any questions on your assignment throughout the week be sure to let me know and I will see you online next week for our last session. Thanks everyone.


Even if I'm a wizard, I still can't apply embarrassing tattoos to the NPC. If we run out of cannonballs, armadillos will not do it a pinch. Fine familiar scrolls are not a substitute for the hunting skill. I cannot have any gun mentioned in the Geneva convention by name. If my alignment forbids torture, that includes no-misch poetry slams. Even if this is an adventuring party, I can't show up to the adventurer drunk and wearing only a toga, lampshade, and half-elf stripper. If my superpower is super growth, that includes my skin. An in-scale tuba player is not an appropriate miniature for my gnome bard. The answer to who's got point is not the fireball. No deity will let me use my nipples as holy symbols. I cannot name my character Dred Pirate Wobberts. No initiating social challenges based only on the color of the werewolf's shoes. Every time a PC takes themselves out through its own stupidity, it does not let me sing the Oompa Loompa song. I can't have a magic item I can't request with a straight face. My superhero tank must be height and weight-proportionate. One closed call with a mimic does not give me the right to attack every door I come across.  The forehead is not an appropriate place for a kill count hollow tattoo. No matter how much my humanity loss, a chainsaw is not a substitute for a bayonet.  My blessed does not have the hindrance alien, Stigmata. No offering the old man and the farm kid a better rate to Alderaan. Dwarves make poor Vikings and vice versa. Even if the rules allow it, I cannot play a dire gummy bear. When asked what my character is doing, it had better not be the vita kinetic. I must remember before the next time I shave off the sleeping dwarf's beard and glue it to the sleeping elf, wars have been started that way. Dwarves are not a proper substitute for pufferfish. The GM decides my character dies from a stroke, not me. I can't use audible glamour to trick the cleric into building an ark. Just because they are all on the rock, metal and axes, dwarves are not all headbangers. Replacing a solo's bullet with blanks so he comes in dead last and body count isn't funny. Medicine cabinets are not the best place to stash spare squeezed tubes of explosive putty. When asked to tutor someone on his defensive trait, can't keep punching him until he gets it. When told to choose my weapon in a duel with the assassin, can't pick his weapon. Cannot recreate any scene in 2001 of space odyssey involving women's lingerie. Arguments cannot end with the statement, alright, we'll settle this like penguins. Recon means tell them what I saw, not slaughter all the monsters without them. German characters do not get four racial bonus to intimidate French characters. The DM is not impressed with me spoiling his well-planned ambush by just casting glassy on the door. Before hiding with all the werewolves ambushed a setite, make sure he didn't leave the lark four hours ago. Even if he loves me too, chitty-chitty bang-bang is not an appropriate choice for the romance background. Casual attire does not include shoulder holsters. My character's grandma was not, is not and will never be a contract killer. Even if the rules allow it, I can't gain one million XP with one forged check. No matter how much mousse I use, my hair will never have damage resistance. No matter how high my face skill, still can't take God as an ally. If the game store owner goes into vapor lock, the adventure is over. Any answer to a question involving the words wizard, station wagon, and wood paneling is no. Can't marry off another PC more than half a dozen times. Zero body count does not mean just the ones they can find. Games don't fall for the fake ball trick more than once. My alignment is not sarcastic good. My fighter cannot take the flaw addiction stabbing things. Cannot wish for the party to have common sense, even the wish spell has its limits. If the party goes into my room and finds a deva wearing only baby oil, oven mitts, and spurs, they can start the module without me. When asked my position in the party, it's not whatever's closest to Bangkok. A crayon is typically going to cause a penalty to my forgery skill. Can't put a glass bottom on my tank just so I can see the looks on their faces. Changing sex is restricted to male or female. Quoting ministry lyrics is not SOP for the gladiast D. Walmart is not my one stop shopping place for hunting vampires. The line on my character's sheet for sex is not for keeping score. My paladin will stop referring to their detect evil power as Evildar. Even if I just rolled 832d6 for damage, still can't get a bonus to my Intimidate check. Unlike real life, I don't gain the whirlwind attack to smack all my back talking children. My WWII era of mad scientist will pick a new target for his project other than Manhattan. When offered a Drakkenzian item of my choice, can't pick nunchucks. No matter what the dice say, can't decapitate an aberrant with a straight razor. ATST soccer games are strictly against Imperial Army protocols. Cannot name Boba Fett as a godparent to any of my children. While I'm fixing the X-Wing, the brash pilot is still miffed about the Y-Wing loner. House Carita of mech warriors do not appreciate posters of Godzilla taped over their optical sensors. Teleport without pants is not a real spell. It is not necessary to install a portacus in every single room in my castle. When deciding what to do with the ancient alien artifact we discovered, eBay is not an option. Even if the rules allow it, I can't take the identical twin advantage 22 times. My character's primary purpose in the party is not just to leech 1-6th of all the XP. Elves do not have the racial trait no gag reflex. Extract the bad guy to not mean with a recreation of the Apollo landing. I do not have time into black ops for breakdancing, Greco-Roman wrestling or phone sex. My axe does not go off accidentally when I'm cleaning it. Even if he's a total blast, can't channel Baron Samedi at a coming out ball. Can't make a cold shot with a flamethrower. After finishing the cliched new boss's villain adventure, can't file for unemployment. My mummy can't take out multiple life insurance policies on himself and name himself the Prime Beneficiary. The game of chicken does not involve the Polymorph spell. My vampire hunter does not take the Un out of Undead. I cannot backstab anybody with a Burek Skylark. Even if the rules allow it, my paladin cannot have the flaw, hatred, all living things. The combat feats I can use with a batter and ram are extremely restricted. The Burek and Kynan's dysfunctional family is not a real spell. No matter what the kids say, animated balloon animals are the poor use of the Karei Golem feat. The Dr. Jones School of Swordfighting is not an appropriate swordsman school. There is no conspiracy to write out the gnomes' contribution to the Fellowship of the Ring. Search the old castle means enter it, not level it with artillery and dig through the rubble. Bind the elf babe a trampoline and tell her to boost her dexterity isn't fooling anybody. Any plan involving strapping puppies to my armor is vetoed. No accidentally cross-wiring the X-Wing's fire control and ejection seat switches. During the black-off, no accessing the target's HR files and getting babes' phone numbers. FedEx does not deliver to the keep on the Borderlands.


Hey guys, this is Rich from RichTVLive. I'm looking at Tesla Inc. TSLA and it has been climbing post-market 9.74% on some big news. Tesla TSLA Q3 earnings and revenues top estimates. This from Zax Equity Research. Tesla TSLA came out with quarterly earnings of $2.90 per share beating the Zax Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.55 per share. That's a huge difference. This compares to a loss of $2.92 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of 627.27%. Wow! A whopping 627%. A year ago it was expected that this electronic electric car maker would post a loss of $2.78 per share when it actually produced a loss of $3.06 delivering a surprise of 10.07%. Over the last four quarters the company has surpassed consensus EPS earning per share estimates three times. Tesla, which belongs to the Zax Automotive Domestic Industry, posts revenues of $6.82 billion for the quarter-ended September 2018. Wow! $6.82 billion surpassing the Zax Consensus Estimate by 20.43%. That is huge. This compares to year ago revenues of $2.98 billion more than doubling its revenue from a year ago. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters. This is a company that is showing strength. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recent release numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Tesla shares have lost about 5.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 2.5%. What's next for Tesla? Well, Tesla has outperformed the market so far this year. The question that comes to investors' minds is, what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure which can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarters, but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in the earning estimates' revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a trend and tested ratio tool like the Zax rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimates revisions. Ahead of the earnings release, the estimated revision trend for Tesla was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zax rank number 3 hold for the stock. So the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zax number one ranked strong buy stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS earning per share estimate is 0.26 on a 6.36 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and 6.44 on 19.6 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zax industry rank, automotive domestic is currently in the bottom 19 percent of the 250 plus Zax industries. Our research shows that the top 50 percent of the Zax ranked industries outperformed the bottom 50 percent by a factor of more than two to one. What do you think about this news? Now I remember Rich TV Live is strictly for education entertainment purposes. Do your due diligence, do your research before you invest in anything that we talk about here on Rich TV Live. Tesla beating earnings up 9.74 percent pre-market could be a big winner tomorrow. If you like this video, smash the like button, comment down below. I like to know what you think about this news. Seems like it's huge news. Revenue is booming for Tesla. It's at $316 up 9.74 percent. If you haven't subscribed, subscribe, and hit that bell for notifications so every time we've got any breaking news, you can hear it first. It's true. Holler at your boy. Ammo. Peace.