Hello. Hello. My name is Colin McClay. I'm from the University of Southern California where I run a thing called the Annenberg Innovation Lab and I'm thrilled to be here with you today. If you're anything like me, you're kind of torn between all the different great conversations that were just happening and we're only able to go to one, which was great, but it was also sad because you missed four other ones. So the bad news is we can't fix that. The good news is there are great notes from the group, so you'll be able to kind of access those later. In the context of this conversation, however, we want to have a conversation and not try to recount each of those five great conversations because as great as they were, we only have about half an hour, 40 minutes, and what we want to do is really force ourselves, each of these groups, to kind of highlight just a couple like one, two, or perhaps three key insights and or questions. So to not recount the entire dialogue and not even recount the most perfect questions or the most perfect insights, but to just give us a flavor of the connectors of the drivers and forces that play between in this kind of AI and inclusion discussion from each of these categories. So the idea being that if we can get each of those on the table from each group, then we can identify some interconnections and some kind of common questions, some shared issues across these and to start a conversation from there. So that's what I want to do. Does that make any sense at all? So this is really distilling into a few nuggets, part of that conversation, not the whole conversation, very Tweedish to be able to launch the conversations. We'll do that. We'll do a quick roundup of the five groups and then really just open it up for observations on those interconnections on other points that weren't raised in that first round to give us each of a flavor and then carry us through lunch into the conversation about where these points of interconnections are. Okay. Do people feel like that's a yes? Yes. Come on. We have to make it through lunch. Come on. All right. So what I want to do is just go to the, I see we already have this great picture. This is all visualized there. We even have the key findings. Which group is this from right here? That's up. Mikayla? All right. Layla is going to start. I think we need a mic so that everyone can hear you. There she is. Thank you. I'm Layla Kesar, Istanbul Belgi University. I'm director of the IT Love Institute there. And as law and governance breakout group, we determined three important key findings. One of them is the lack of legal definition of AI. And there are lots of AI definition. Since we heard yesterday, really, really many definition. But when it comes to legal one, there is no. Maybe it will be important to the legal person to create a common one, the legal definition of AI. And there is also open questions in terms of law discipline. For example, the liability is one of the important question of lawyer regarding the algorithms and AI also. And there is also no common methodology or alternative methodology. That is the second key findings of us. It's also important to know for multi-stakeholder model, local or international multi-stakeholder model would help to solve kind of problems or create more definite roadmap for the people. And the third one is there is also no clear understanding as to technology itself. We need to understand how algorithms work in order to eliminate bias or in order to make it more understandable, interpretable. We need to understand the details, the technical works of the technology itself. That's the third one. Great, thank you for modeling that so wonderfully. Just while we're here, any quick questions on that? Needed for clarification, that feels clear to folks? Okay, great. Now on to group number next. Is there an image up there? That's the second page. So maybe go back one. Thank you. Great. So our session was, well, my name is sorry again, I'm from the ITU. Our session was on business models. We had a really lively discussion. It probably could have gone on another hour. So it's a little hard to choose just a few things, but I'll do my utmost best. As you can see, we started with talking about what do we actually mean by a business model. You can't recount the whole trajectory. I promise I won't. We started by looking at what we meant by business models. We had some discussion around that and you can see some of the key points up there. There was a lot of interest in how can we work inclusion into the business model in the first place? So it's baked right in and we looked at different dimensions of what we mean by inclusion, which we felt was relevant for the business case. We also talked about another theme was how do we move from corporate social responsibility and philanthropy to thinking about creating shared value and what can we learn from other areas like corporate sustainability where a lot of these kind of challenges have been around for a while? So how can we learn from that to have new business models? Maybe we can have page two. A couple of interesting points that came up was around this whole question of prices and profiling. And some interesting examples that were shared were around how if you're looking on Google for a particular flight, you might be charged a lot more than if you're just looking for that a flight generally to that country and they're raising ethical questions. And on the other hand, would that just be a Robin Hood approach, which is not really appropriate necessarily some people thought for a company? Or is it just like bargaining in the marketplace? So you can see we had some really interesting discussions around these themes. And then maybe just one other point around the ideas around social entrepreneurship where business models, it's not just about profit, there's other types of value which is factored in as well. So there was interest in that and to see how for this area we could really build on those. So it sounds okay. Where is it? Just very briefly, in the end we were essentially dancing around what is the role of government in terms of regulating data about human beings when they are the product and when they have no means of control over it. And we built on an analogy that Ursula actually came up with, which was the analogy of the immortal life of Henrietta Lacks and the idea that she couldn't predict that her cells would be used to help others, but she did not benefit from it either financially or emotionally in any way. No one can predict that. What does that mean for data? Great. All right, next group. And then so I hope you're, as you're hearing these, kind of pulling out the themes that feel resonant from other groups to your group into the conversations that you had, right? So this is the idea here. We're identifying kind of common themes across all these different conversations. So maybe we don't have a screenshot of all yet, so that's not spoken yet. We will find you. So there's the algorithm and design group? Great. Boom. That was magic. So I think that's one of about 17 pages that we wrote, but not to sort of summarize just very quickly to give a few takeaways. We talked about algorithm and design at various levels, at input and output data, at black boxes, at algorithms, at the infrastructure, at the platform level, how you bake it into the education space and into curricula. So we looked at various strategies and approaches to actually help design of systems be more fair and equitable. And I think one of the really interesting takeaways that we had was this is an issue that the public actually really cares about. Like it's really hard to argue against fairness, so we should really be using that to help inform and engage with advocacy efforts. And I think we also looked at how if there are 21 definitions of fairness, is it okay to have 21 kinds of algorithms? And we also talked about the need for more data, not just in terms of to look at whether it's biased, unbiased, clean, dirty, et cetera, but also in terms of how when you actually affect fairness, whether it's actually working. So we wanted to look at how are there good proxies to look at fairness, even if you can't make systems more explainable as algorithms create more algorithms, which then generate new features. Is explainability or transparency even the end result of what our efforts are? Should we be actually aspiring to more things? And I think finally one thing was how if all of these are socially and politically constructed and technology has agency, do we just look for something neutral or do we actually aspire for something that's much higher than neutrality? So I think I'll just leave it there. Great, thank you. There's the infrastructure group that's remaining. So are you? Great. Okay, that's cool blue neon stuff. So I'm going to try to make a very short summary, but this process, so would they like to go first and I can go? Cool. I don't know which mine is. I'm sorry. We'll get that up, I guess. Okay, but so I just want to continue. Should we wait until we get the text up? Because what I'm saying is not on the text. The text is just additional material that you can look up on Twitter. Okay, so there is no reasoned way, no transparent way in which I came upon this summary, which leads me really to the first part that there is nothing new under the sun, that a lot of the problems that you're having with or issues that you're discussing with data and infrastructure really are issues we've been discussing across the board on everything. There were references made all the way back to media studies and 1920s debates and media studies and democracy theory to the kinds of problems we've been having with regard to open data and IoT collected data and data quality etc. So there isn't really anything new. Infrastructure level problems like access, accessibility, and procedural inclusion and fairness are still central and we can't address many of the other issues fairly until and unless we address these. But there is a caveat. There are some things, some kinds of problems which are exacerbated because of AI, things which might have existed earlier, for example groupings by identities which we don't present consciously but by statistics which we represent now and we may not realize. Now these kinds of groupings have been happening in areas maybe like insurance but now it's all pervasive and we aren't necessarily defining ourselves, other people are defining us by various identities. These kinds of problems may be new and we may face new problems also when we have sovereign machines which are emotionally and rationally sovereign but until then it's a bunch of problems. Data based exclusion, data exploitation and data colonialism. There's a large discussion to be had here on things such as surveillance capitalism versus excluding the poor which is preferable and about the, there was a point made that privileged might determine the narrative whether it is about surveillance capitalism or whether it is about things like net neutrality and some people as forms of inclusion might actually want the free choice to be a data subject itself and while talking about data colonialism how free trade, fair trade and all these things are so complicated and when it comes to even coming up with conceptual solutions leave alone practical ones, pragmatic ones in a geopolitical system, two questions of data flow and data trade and data colonialism so there's a problem. Could I end with one last line which is that there is no such thing as neutrality and we have to move beyond neutrality to other questions of how we evaluate biases and counter biases. Thank you. Last group. So thank you. I'm Arisa and I would like to kind of share the topics what we discussed in the user behavior expectations and what I thought is so we discussed within like less than 20 people and we had the person from Kenya and from the university and also the person from the Microsoft so it would be nice to share the information from both point of view so what we have discussed is that from Sarah's perspective that the AI in Kenya is not so pervasive yet so he discussed about the importance of education and could you give us some. Okay just briefly I think we came there was a consensus that there is a huge need for education so that people actually develop an awareness of what expectations they need to have and with that education also comes a new maybe a need for a new type of software engineering where people actually take into consideration their users and that sort of thing and this would lead to when you have a lot of people with the skills in AI you'd have a diversity of people solving the problems and therefore a diversity of solutions and you know as if there are many people tackling problems then you end up I think the user ends up coming into the center I think that was in the realm of education. Thanks a lot and also from the Aresandra from Microsoft gives us a very wonderful view from like the how engineers discuss this kind of AI topics and also the emotional intelligence what do you think about that so the topic yeah that was basically some of the principles that the group as a whole debated and we try to to link them those principles to the user's expectations which is AI must be transparent AI should maximize efficiency without affecting the dignity of people AI should be designed for intelligent privacy of course algorithm accountability and emotional intelligence embedded in AI solutions to calibrate Spock answers right basically saying that so that was the the teams that the group debated it is live and healthy debate and thanks a lot for the group great thank you so much okay so as you were trying to make sense of that I'm curious to hear what people either heard or didn't hear as the intersections among those different observations from those conversations for me I heard a lot of stuff about definitions and the needing needing to kind of form clear definitions about what we're talking about the need for understanding and not just kind of initial understanding and learning but ongoing strategies to continue to do that as we think about the implications for each of our different fields which seems to be a common theme also kind of adapting to saying in a legal environment or in computer science teaching how do we think about the implications for our fields issues of incentives why people orgs companies do the things they do I heard about sectoral roles strategies for the for learning which I mentioned the thinking about how to leverage the public interest the caring on these things what were the things that jumped out at any of you or that felt like they went unstated please in the back thanks I'm Shaz Jameson from tilt as was commented by Raphael in our group we've spoken a lot about moral compasses about ethics about norms about fairness and inclusion social good but what's missing is we're trying to find a way and we haven't heard social justice so much we're kind of talking around it but we're all kind of trying to find what we want to be doing without pointing to it directly so that's what's missing from the conversation for me and I one of the places that I heard that was sort of whether we had affirmative expert expectations around what these technologies could do right so that's sort of that connection of not just guiding it and trying to slow a train but really to think about where we're steering it other observations I'm attentive to the sides I realize people feel like they've been left out come on hi seeing these debates I wonder if when we discuss values and human goals that we want to address in AI considering risks and opportunities we have a framework international framework which are the sustainable development goals all governments of the world agree with with this framework so I wonder if besides checking AI against human rights instruments and humanitarian instruments we could also check them against the SDGs so then we lose last time discussing what we want to achieve and have a framework to discuss how to achieve it directly as it is speak about everything we're discussing here thank you very helpful thank you so that that's the sort of connection to there's a couple in the back there how about these we're going to take these two over here and then we'll go to Nagla I think some of the intersections that we picked up and from the groups were related to the ongoing problems of structural inequality and related to the social justice issues the you know structural inequality around human rights framework as well so the intersection of those and I think you know until we sort of try to look at in terms of strategies and solutions to these we keep coming back to the problems of lack of access lack of intensity of use lack of participation and representation in algorithmic data or big data and therefore lack of representation from global south and underdeveloped countries but and you know as long as we keep speaking in paradigms that are quite individualistic that are quite market focused not to say that these haven't driven take up and made enormous advances but in terms of addressing the structural inequalities they simply not going to address that we've got to find new strategies of doing things so I think alongside and in a hybrid way looking at these inequalities and these lack of access from a more kind of communal point of view communal access looking at infrastructure in particular but I think it applies to various other things data as well from the demand side value not just the supply side value where you have you know reasonable extraction from commercial practices looking at some of these demand side values that offer public and social goods in terms of opening up spectrum to allow people to participate to experiment with AI etc to you know provide public access so that people can supplement the unaffordable services that they've got etc have to be looked at to address these structural inequalities to follow someone on these lines I think what I keep asking myself in relationship to artificial intelligence for more in relationship to inclusion is as we are this diverse group of people sitting here talking about what are the possible solutions problems etc what are the top three top five things that we more or less agree on and how can we use the harness our power to to focus on that so for example someone mentioned this morning Felipe algorithm accountability okay there's lots of things we can take on but if we think about social justice and we think about inclusion we think about a strategy and using the power that we have in this room what are the top three issues that we're going to take on this year thank you I think I mean not to some extent is this conversation right it's trying to build on those yes I want to I want to add something that keeps coming to my mind as I listen to the other breakouts we talk about AI as one thing so in our discussions for example we talk about business models a comment that was made by Felipe was that maybe we should think of business models in the different in the tech industry AI for governments etc this also comes from my conviction that we think of AI users as one group perhaps and AI production as another activity the reason I say this is again thinking of inclusion and framing all of this under an inclusion framework it is about participating in the production of the technologies so when we say business AI business models is it one and the same it's not one and the same so how can we think of perhaps sort of this distinguishing between the different types of a eyes and the different uses in a way that can include not just the users but also the production eventually in an equalizing manner so to sort of against the asymmetry of power and data technologies etc thank you yeah I feel like that connects to sort of some of the comments about the important context about being user centric and this is sort of this whole the cycle of production and consumption really changing yeah thank you Wolfgang thank you maybe three things which I at least saw in many of the the presentations or remarks one is the struggle to find out what is actually new when we talk about AI there are obviously some things maybe this probabilistic turn maybe the categorization and that has of course a lot of potential impact on inclusion issues but other things are simply talking about growing autonomy of technology it's about algorithms as such and so on so what I find really interesting and as he has all struggled to find find that out together is what are really the points where AI makes a difference that is important for our societal discussion the second one is and I think that's actually a really a good thing in this context is that the importance of technology really forces us to operationalize and think about specific things like inclusion like fairness and the procedures behind that what is the role of politics and law there the normal procedure was that we agree on a political process on things we have as common values and then translated into laws and then it's a compliance issue but of course it's much more complex there are moral debates and different communities and I think that we have the chance now to make clearer what our values actually are how we frame fairness how we frame inclusion is really something we should be thankful for the development that we have the chance to do that and then see how that translate into our discussions about technology and governance and maybe the third thing that came up in many discussions was that there is the need to bridge in a specific way different communities software engineering governance and so on and maybe one role of the network also already touched that issue in the morning one of the the thing we could do as a network is to think about specific educational tools that we develop for one community for the other the governance people for for software engineers and the other way around I think that's there are some attempts already but there's still something to be done and I think we can make a difference there thank you very helpful other thoughts thank you a lot of the conversations here actually remind me of the old days of code is law and I think when we actually think of AI as an object of governance we're missing the fact that it's also producing governance and it's actually enacting it in many ways so I think in the same way that we started to think of code as something that was a lawmaking artifact I think if I'm hearing from a lot of the conversations that we're beginning to see AI in the same way as something that implements values that embeds normative practices and aspirations and therefore seeing it as only something that we're going to regulate or not or leave alone I think it misses that element of AI actually enforcing and enacting certain values and norms and actually being a media of governance so that for me is really helpful I think that brings me back to the definitional piece of what are we really talking about and there's sort of there are moments where as a technical matter it's important to know what we're talking about but also the way that we're talking about this suite of issues right as an object of governance as a process or otherwise I feel like that's another place where the way that you've just framed it Malavika and Wolfgang sort of helps orient how we might engage or what we need to be able to engage productively with it. Nisha. Hi thank you so I thought what was what's really striking in all these conversations is that there is a sense of temporality and a crisis of time that seems to kind of divide groups in different ways because there are groups which are thinking of AI as disruption and they are happier to be slow in kind of communicating with AI we are waiting for it to kind of unfold to figure out what really is going to happen go more into speculation and then there is a different organization of time which is looking at AI as crisis like there is no time left like you have to act now and do something about it and I think that reorganization of time that computing has always done or might be good to bring back into conversation because we don't want to fall back into an either or debate about do we have enough time for research or do we need to act now they both need to happen simultaneously but they need their own temporality for the crossovers to happen so that's in terms of developing tactics how this group can go further or bringing in the time scale at what we are looking at because for activists who are working on let's say human rights watch three months is too much and for people who want to do deep dive research which includes for example historical and definitional work we'll need at least five years to get there and how are you going to kind of bridge the divide between the two might be interesting to follow through so I think that's wonderful to me it's an urgent important another way to describe it and I but I also feel like in in the conversation we've had so much that this is about process right it's about it's not going to happen and be done but it's an ongoing set of issues and so I think that's very helpful to say we need to both act now and engage with this but we're going to need to keep engaging over time and recognize that in the three-month time frame nothing's going to happen but something's going to happen in the five years so that's wonderfully helpful. Others? Hi, I'm Vidushi from Article 19. I just wanted to respond to a suggestion that was made earlier that we should look at sustainable development goals as opposed to human rights standards. I think there's a case to be made to keep human rights standards as the minimum requirement against which we then build legal and ethical frameworks because I think what Malvika pointed out to in the morning about how companies often use terms like privacy very conveniently that kind of happens when we focus on just ethical frameworks without an actual legal legally binding grounding and I think there is a there is a conversation to be had about how different frameworks and competing values can be better established in the AI context. So there's a bunch of these comments which have been kind of about how AI these issues change existing institutions and how they interact with those institutions and I think so like to me that feels like mapping those interactions and being aware of how do we learn from the past and build on the things that we that exist that are very powerful but then also asking per Wolfgang what's really new here and what is changed and what what what for what does it force us to reevaluate and to understand how those things may be changed. I think it's important to think about the fact that we shape the technology shapes the way that we work and the way that we govern and the way that we think but we also shape the way that the technology is built so in a sense I think that something that we established here with a lot of the comments yesterday is that these kind of discussions are still very high level they're very abstract and we really need to put an emphasis and this is kind of like what the conference is doing right now which is really important is to really make this into actionable points really think about these kind of things and for example I was in the business model we need to create a business model that is actually something that is actionable for companies for governments for startups to think about in that sense because the shaping goes both way the technology shapes us but we also shape it so the fact that a lot of us are here and there is this sense of inclusion and and collaboration means that we are going to go out and shape what the technology is going to look like so in a sense it's a we we I think that the discourse in itself is kind of disempowering because we talk about how the technology is going to change everything and what are we going to do and how are we going to stay in control of it but we are in control of it we are making it this is a human product so in a sense we need to kind of start thinking about actionable points that we can take from this to make sure that all of the visions that we come out with them out of this conference for inclusion will actually become a reality. Thank you I think as we think about big overarching issues really important to ground them in things that we can act on in the case study conversation that'll happen later but to think about how we go further and deeper and become more sort of through through a more micro explorations more precise in our understandings more nuanced. Other comments especially over at the back. Okay just an overall suggestion Alex Kukuru that perhaps one of the ways we could adopt is an analytical framework is to look at AI in different components or clusters such that we could have maybe we deconstructed into what may be process components of AI what could be system components of AI what could be instrument slash tool components of artificial intelligence and then what could be outcome components and then within each of the realm of these clusters we can try and fit in so that we are able to start looking at issues in a sort of a compartmentized way knowing that they are interconnected at some point but it gives us a good analytical framework. Thank you Melanie. Thanks I would like to to continue on the Kodas law comparison but it's completely true and it's something we started to discuss in the governance session and I just forgot what I wanted to oh no I remember now what I wanted to say we mentioned that if we compare earlier when we were meeting as a creative community in order to try to build an alternative to what by then seemed to be the most pervasive dangerous thing for what was inclusivity by then was access to knowledge what we tried in terms of resistance was to develop and build an alternative and which took the form of a legal hack of of copy left so what would be an alternative way to to conceptualize and and to develop this regulation through technology what would be the the copy left of AI. There's a fellow called Stephen Duncan Duncan who talks about the tyranny of the possible and the challenge of seeing what's in front of you and all of the barriers and then only being able to imagine a gradient away from where we are now versus kind of an imaginative approach to imagine that future that you want the the copy left version the thing that is the AI and inclusion atmosphere that we want and then think about how do we build back from that what does it take to get there other we have about five minutes left is that right on this or okay so thank you so it's two separate interventions I'm cheating a little one is building off of what Nishant was saying which is that there are two tracks to this there's the urgent and then there is the longer term I'm I'm thinking a little bit about how internet governance worked and how for advocacy it was useful to have a few powerful ideas like intermediary liability and safe harbor that were easy to pick up and and build into systems around the world so I think it would be useful to start doing that for AI something like the campaign against killer robots for example self-explanatory powerful but I think that as a as a task this is this is something that I might prioritize the second is that what's been useful to me as an academic in a setting like this is that I'm hearing a lot from disciplines that I have no conception of how to navigate but equally I'm recognizing a lot that so for example the whole code is law model that's a Ryan Kelo jack Balkan series of papers which I think that people that are not lawyers and obsessed with liability might enjoy reading so I one of the outcomes that I'd love to see is sort of a basic list with a flagging of this is something that someone from another discipline can understand because I feel like that would increase our shared knowledge much faster like it only to clarify I think about bridging communities there is no opposition between checking AI against human rights humanitarian and development goals we need to do all of them and we spoke here about jobs about the impacting economic political elements of social inclusion that you will not find all of them in human rights instruments you need to complement it with a development agenda otherwise you lose the north and south divides and inequalities and at this moment there is a group of diplomats discussing that in New York without all the knowledge and evidence that you have so about bridging communities maybe they should have more evidence and discuss more with you but here also maybe we can use what we have which is a grid framework as a reference that is very progressive and addresses the social justice elements that are missing in some human rights approaches thank you thank you any as we bring this in for landing any last final thoughts quick comments thank you one thing which kind of flows from what Melanie said as well is how environmental movements and and other kinds of justice movements are something that we can learn from because there's a lot of you know long haul work to be done as well and and so movement building around the various kinds of intersections and overlaps of the of the discussions that we had today are also what we need to look to as a next step thank you that's very helpful I mean as we think about this and see this as a place of intersection of so many different interests around the world across so many different communities it seems it demands a diverse participation right and that's an opportunity I think to bring in those other conversations because AI will have implications for all those different spaces and sectors and then to kind of add that to the recognition that these movements take decades to reach fruition that's very helpful okay so as we are about to transition to lunch first a final word from Carlos but I just wanted to thank all of the groups for reporting out so briefly and thoughtfully and all of you for engaging in what was for me at least a really productive interesting conversation so thank you


I need sacred wood. Give me sacred wood, please This is when you realize just how I rated this game actually is sacred wood, yeah Exactly, that's what I'm saying, you know, we just need to give Coruscade the floating head in a waterfall some wood just some sacred wood. It's all he wants in life Brenda I'm gonna teach you how to love by showing you the notebook Sure thing Brenda's dead on the inside, so there's ways to see the notebook. Yeah There's not a lot of New Zealand films that go international There's not a lot of good New Zealand films full stop But if you have if you guys, what what we do in the shadows boy? Yeah, there's a few but not many No, this is true. I didn't say there were I said there were some I didn't say there was none because that's a lie But there's not me. There's not many Arc 3 is your favorite to it doesn't make sense if you didn't do when to toss that's very true And I wish they would address that sometime soon and also why what does Bartleby waiting for just tell us what he knows already? Geez, come on Bartleby. Just do it already. Do your thing Well, let's see if we can do it. He is Gandalf confirmed Frick just give me the wood give me wood, please. I just want some wood Just give me some wood Finn just give it to me. No, no, okay. No, no Not happening. That's fine. I didn't want it anyway No, you totally did want it Did you ask for my consent? Well, you just gave your consent. No, I didn't did is it in writing not for consent then I It's like a business transaction you need to put it down in writing Otherwise someone can backstab you, you know Both parties have to agree and sign on the dotted line and then initial on this bit here And then this bit here and then this here and then another signature down the bottom as well And then it's confirmed But first you have to can you have to understand the terms of both parties Yep, T's and C's may apply That's how business works guys Life lessons with Finn and Brent is called the lesson of life not the game of life. I've played that game once. That was a weird game I don't like it The end life is great. I don't like it. I played it once didn't really suit it You know, it doesn't suit my style. It doesn't fit my aesthetic Because one doesn't simply not do life, you know Mm-hmm. Yeah, that's why the game of life in so quickly Exactly. We actually won though. We won. It was teams. It was couples couples Couples game of life night. It was great Yeah, I was not invited It wasn't with anybody I knew either so it was kind of even more weird except obviously Obviously the people who are you know in the team invited by in the team with yeah, exactly We won because I always win. Did you win?  I'll be very dissapointed. I'm still in a battle fin. I'm still trying to get wood Don't worry, I got the sacred wood finally One of them was just really um one of them was just really stubborn and needed a bit more convincing I needed to sign extra business contracts to consensually destroy him It's mirage was all about getting his eye back But it didn't fix him probably because he still moans a bit when you go in him I need to think before I say things I'm actually surprised at how quick this area is I always forget how quick it actually is it feels like it takes forever But then it doesn't and it's great the science center though That's gonna be a fun episode to record with you science center is a beach On the islands they look very happy about it Not trapped. They're just caught captive caught captive held captive. That's what I said, right? That's what I mean. No. Yeah, I did.  You know, you're just too fast too fast too smart for me Well, it was confused. You should stay confused. That's great Well, there we go level up Look at that. Fantastic. We're getting to go into storm river next time Finn. Isn't that cute? I'm confused, but sure Yeah, we're finished. I Really hate how people no offense to no offense But I just really hate how people say tell me something and then just assume after I haven't even looked at them yet Because I've been slightly preoccupied that they're just terrible Because they didn't get my opinion, I'm sorry, but that just kind of rubs me the wrong way not like trying to roast anybody but When you're ready Anyway, thank you guys for watching the craft box and thank you for Take two It was a great great adventure with us today and remember Life one more time Anyway, thank you guys for watching remember to like and subscribe Um Brent, you did a great episode today. Thank you for tuning in and all the people on YouTube think you're tuning in as well And remember craft outside the box. Goodbye


taking over as GM of the Chicago Bears. The Bears have been struggling recently. It's time someone came in and fixed this franchise. This video ends when we hoist the Lombardi trophy. Let's hop in. The most important player to look at here is Justin Fields, of course. In real life, what are the Bears playing to do with him? I don't know. A lot of people say, Justin Fields, those first three games were horrendous. But against the Broncos, he looked really solid. Granted, this is the same Broncos team that had 70 put up on them. And normally, I'd say, of course, they'll stick with Justin Fields. But as it stands in real life, the Bears have the number one and the number two pick. Marvin Harrison Jr. and Caleb Williams should be available. If this trend continues throughout the season, a lot of people believe they're gonna draft Caleb Williams. It would be a weird scenario to say the least. But as far as my rebuild is concerned, I believe in Justin Fields.  He will develop really, really well. Just need some time. 70 throw overall is really low. Our stud wide receiver won DJ Moore. I feel bad for DJ Moore. He was in a pretty tough scenario in the Panthers. And now he's in an even worse scenario with the Bears. But that doesn't matter to me because I'm gonna make this DJ Moore a monster. We're gonna use him as much as we can. I'm putting him at wide receiver one. I'm putting him at slot wide receiver. His simulated stat should be awesome. He's a great wide receiver. He's superstar. He's 26. As for the rest of these guys, Chase Claypool and Darnell Mooney, I expect they will do stuff here and there, but I think DJ Moore is gonna be the workhorse. But honestly, they're not bad. Darnell Mooney and Chase Claypool are manageable. Now Madden has Mercedes-Lewis as the starting tight end, but this is silly. Cole Comet is the guy. I already like Cole Comet, but Justin Fields in real life loves Cole Comet. 24 years old, six foot six. He's got solid stats already. He's gonna get a lot, a lot better and he's star devs, so he'll progress well. I'm very glad we have him. Offensive line is pitiful. I like Cody White here. He's good. And then Darnell Wright, the rookie out of Tennessee is gonna progress well, but a 67 left tackle is laughable. That is so bad. So one of the positions I am gonna target in this draft is a tackle. Hopefully it's deep on those. We'll have to see. If not, maybe a center will have to look into free agency, but I'm not gonna lie, offense isn't that bad. In real life, it looks horrible, but it just isn't that bad. Also, the game has got to form in as the starting back. I want Khalil Herbert. Love Khalil Herbert. He's 25 too, so one of the really nice things about this rebuild, you look at all the important pieces on this offense, everybody's 26 or younger. And I mean, the oldest guy that we're really paying attention to is DJ Moore and he's 26. Darnell Wright's a rookie. Khalil Herbert's young. Fields is young. Comet's young. Mooney's young. It's actually pretty nice as far as a rebuild is concerned, but then we get to defense and defense is not as bright. Probably the second worst deline in the league. The only worst deline is probably the Arizona Cardinals. So a dominant edge rusher, right or left end, or even an outside linebacker who's built for it is something we should target in the draft as well. Tremaine Edmonds is a beast and he's 25, so we don't gotta worry about anything there. TJ Edwards is 27. He's kinda at that brink age as far as rebuilds go, but this is a nasty outside linebacker. He's got very, very good stats. So he should make it to our Lombardi team. That's my hope. Jaquon Brisker is young out of Penn State. He doesn't have the best stats yet, but I think he'll get there. He should progress well. Also anybody who knows me, you know how painful it is to wear a bear's uniform for this video, but I had to do it. Eddie Jackson's the main vet on defense. I like him a lot, but 91 speed and he's only gonna regress from here. I'm not really interested in trading him. I'm really not interested in making any massive trade. At least not right now. I actually like the core of this team. We got Terry Stevenson at corner. He's 23, but he's a rookie. He's got time. He's gonna progress. Then we also have Jalen Johnson who's really young. So you look at the bear's roster on paper. They're really struggling, low overalls, but wow, is this a young team? Very young team. I think if we're able to draft a dominant edge rusher and potentially draft a solid left tackle or sign one in free agency, this bear's roster is gonna be a whole lot better. We just can't expect to win anything of significance in year one or year two. Maybe year three is when we start to look at the playoffs. Now, normally I like to use Kansas City Chiefs or Dallas Cowboys playbook. They're the most OP playbooks for passing yards, but I wanna try something different for this rebuild. Justin Fields is too fast and it's also not realistic. To give Justin Fields a Patrick Mahomes playbook is just not realistic. I'm gonna run Baltimore Ravens, John Harbaugh's offense. This should hopefully get Justin Fields running as much as humanly possible. It'll use Khalil Herbert a lot. Hopefully it doesn't take too much away from DJ Moore. That's my only concern with this. I've also never tried this in a sim, but I think it'll be fun. Let me just make sure that DJ Moore is wide receiver one and slot wide receiver and he should still get solid simulated stats. That's the hope, getting him subbed in there. All right, beautiful. All right, y'all, it's week one. Let's see what the prospects look like right now. I'm already seeing, oh, this is so nice. So as it stands, the second overall pick, Reed McAllister and LSU left tackle. I really do wanna left tackle. I should have a pretty high pick. Ooh, it'd be nice to pick him up, but we'll just have to see how this season pans out for us. There's multiple left ends up here. Actually, Chad Hardesty and Richard Henry. I'm also looking for an edge rusher. So far it's looking like this draft class works out for us. Quarterback, no, strong safety, no. Detackle, no, wide receiver, outside linebacker. There's a left tackle at 12. There's a left end at 13. Lots of tackles. Actually very deep tackle class. Look at this. Right tackle, right tackle, left tackle, left tackle. Nice. My three-star scout is Shawn Donovan, wide receivers and corners. I'm sorry, Shawn. She's not gonna happen, man. Travis Bailey is a three-star for the ends and his second year expertise is detackles. My entire defensive line could use a revamp. I'm personally targeting edge rushers, but if Travis Bailey randomly sniffed out like a generational detackle, that'd be pretty awesome too. I'd obviously take it. All right, let's head to mid-season and see what the bears are up to here. My prediction is two and five.  Okay, well, you know what? It literally is good. I hate to say it, but in a rebuild, this is good. Oh, and seven. It has been a struggle for the Chicago Bears.  I mean, the Chargers are in 84 overall. They're one and five. So yeah, it's just tough sledding in the NFC North. The Vikings are seven and oh, and the Packers and Lions each have four wins. My national focus scouting is gonna be on the end. I feel like I could probably just get a good tackle not no matter what, but whether my tackle is a star or superstar or that good doesn't matter nearly as much as if my D-End is. It's really important to me that we get an awesome D-End in this draft. So we're focusing on that. Let's head to the playoffs. Let's see if the Chicago Bears get a win. You know what's funny though, like this is actually what they could be at in real life at mid-season. They could be oh, and seven. The Chicago Bears finish the season two and 15. Absolutely pitiful. Let's see just how bad it was though. Statistically, was Raven's playbook just a bad call?  Justin Fields ends the season with 2,614 passing yards. That is the literal lowest in the league. Oh my God. So Rogers ends with 4,400, burrow. Dude, this is actually pitiful. We literally were the worst starting quarterback in the league. It wasn't even close as far as passing yards. Jimmy G is next and then CJ Stroud. This is so funny to me. CJ Stroud is the only quarterback who played worse than me with 19 interceptions. CJ Stroud is an absolute God in real life right now. He's actually playing so good. Deshaun Watson's down here. Baker's down here. Impressive rushing yards for Justin Fields at 756. But look at this, Hertz, 762, 15 touchdowns. Justin Fields, zero, zero touchdowns. Oh my God, that's horrible. Khalil Herbert found the end zone eight times for 700 yards. I mean, we were just horrible. We hardly even scored any touchdowns. DJ Moore had 679 yards and seven touchdowns come at 575 and six. So honestly, this playbook was quite nice for a wide receiver, one tight end and wide receiver, two play pool, got a lot of yards too. So kind of evenly distributed for the wide receivers. I don't know, man. Kermaine Edmonds, damn, 134 tackles, three TFLs. Nobody's sacking the quarterback. Nobody. Yannick Ngakwe got four. Oh, geez. This is undoubtedly the worst start I've ever had to a rebuild. Man, I just, I gotta wonder how much of that is the Ravens playbook. I thought that would be perfect for Justin Fields. I'm switching our playbook to Kansas City. I caved that quick. But what I do like about this is it should use a lot of our tight end. I think Khalil Herbert's gonna take a little sideline here, but Cole Comet and Justin Fields should hopefully have a much better year too. Cass, let's look at the roster. I think these guys are gonna have real low morale. It's gonna be tough sliding in Chicago. Yeah, everybody, everybody's unhappy. Cowboys won the Super Bowl. Absolute massive shocker to absolutely nobody. Josh Jacobs offensive player of the year. Rishi Rice got offensive rookie of the year. Defensive rookie of the year, that is a first. Brian Brecy, Clemson D. Tackle. I've never seen him win it before. Heading into free agency, we have a ton of cap space. The only thing is not a lot of players are gonna be interested in playing for us. So we'll tell you what we can get. I don't hate Michael Pierce. He's just a little too old for me to pay that much. Kurt Gussins is in free agency, okay. Michael Pierce is actually a really good signing for us here. He's not probably gonna play more than two years, but I don't expect to draft a D Tackle. So picking up Michael Pierce to beef up the D line and then drafting an Eddresher would be pretty nice. That's kind of expensive for not that great of a D Tackle, but he's already interested in us. He should hopefully go through. Another offensive line signing, Mitch Morse is available. Could give him a one year deal. I'll sweeten it just a little bit. Hopefully we can get him to come too so a little offensive line boosts. So both those guys sign. This would be a really nice free agency. I don't wanna pick up anyone else though. I'm really worried about the draft. Mitch Morse and Michael Pierce. Welcome to the Chicago Bears. Yo! Oh my God, Jalen Johnson went up to superstar. We had a pitiful season, but I guess if our offense was so bad, we're probably on defense a lot. Jalen Johnson got super, that's huge actually. Did not expect that. I don't think anybody else did anything. No, they didn't, but that is pretty awesome. Taking a look at the mock drafts. We do have the very first pick, but this mock is predicting that what we traded with the Rams, interesting. It's looking like Reed McAllister is an absolute stud though. We also have the fifth pick. Actually no, in a lot of these mocks, it looks like Reed McAllister might actually fall. This is interesting. Those mock drafts having Chad Hardesty actually be the first player off the board. And then Reed McAllister being available later. I think I will do that. I'll take Chad Hardesty first, and then Reed McAllister. And by the way, the reason I want Chad Hardesty is this guy is undoubtedly the best edge rusher in the draft, at least based on these stats. Number one, his skills are absurd. He's got six A's. Really in the stats that matter. Block shedding, Finesse. Finesse and Power Moves being A's gross. He's so good. His physicals are nasty too.  I don't know if he's gonna be Superstar X Factor, but this is one of the most guaranteed talents I'll probably ever draft. Agility change, retching speed is elite. Strength is great. Acceleration's good. Acceleration's the only thing I would want better. This guy's nasty. So with our first pick, we take Chad Hardesty. With our second pick, hopefully, Reed McAllister is still available. His skills are incredible too. Tons of A's all across the board. We need a left tackle. And then physically, his strength is elite, which is the most important physical rating for your offensive line. And the rest is still like pretty good. I mean, his jumping is decent, but I can't imagine that matters. So the perfect draft, Chad Hardesty, Reed McAllister, and we'll pick up some studs in the second round potentially too. All right, the draft is underway. Round one, pick one. You already know exactly what I'm taking. Phil Duncan, you might be a God, man, but I believe Justin Fields. We are taking our guy, Chad Hardesty, out of California, the 6'6 power rusher. This guy has to be hidden death. There is just no way. Boom!  He's a freak power rusher. 6'6, 86 speed, 89 strength, 83.  Chad Hardesty. I'm excited to use him, man. So Chad Hardesty, first, our next pick is round one, pick five. We technically could trade up, but I don't think it's important enough to trade up. I don't really wanna give up anything else either. Let's just hope that those mock drafts really did give us a good look. It doesn't look like the Broncos or the Seahawks wanna left tackle. Definitely not the Seahawks. They have Charles Cross. I could see the Broncos taking him though. This is the only team I'm worried about. They take Phil Duncan. They're done with Russell Wilson. And there's no way the Seahawks are taking a left tackle. There's just no way. Please, don't take my boy. Don't take Reed McAllister, bro. Please, please, please, please, please. Lionel Harper goes to the Seahawks. We got both our guys. Exactly where we wanted him. That's huge. Reed McAllister, we scouted him. He's a top five pick. He's got if he hit and dev himself. Dude, this dude's got 93 strength. Oh, out of LSU, bro. He is league bound. It's just really good acceleration, too. I know the Bears love their screen passes, so maybe that's good. 69 speed, this guy's perfect. Our next pick is the first pick of the second round. So hopefully we can pick up one more hit and dev stud. And this will be a perfect, perfect draft. This center Ian Carlyle has been flying up the board. And I wouldn't hate that, but we did just sign Mitch Moore. So I just think it's overkill. I think the next pick I'm gonna take is actually right guard Jerry Atkinson. I wanna beef my all line up so much. We got an awesome left tackle. And Jerry Atkinson, great physicals with the elite strength, great Excel. His skills have got a lot of A's in there. And he's been flying up the draft board. He's actually up 28 since the start. If he's not hit and dev, this isn't a good pick, but I'm gonna take him. Let's go. Then we got some online monsters in Chicago. 92 strength, 81 Excel. He's hit and dev too. So he's looking like a really, really good draft so far. Our next picks can be round three pick one. I almost wanna take a wide receiver. I almost wanna take a wide receiver that's one available. Couple safeties. There is a wide receiver available and he has been flying up the boards too. Luke Hardy out of Oklahoma State. His catching is F. How is your catching F? His skills look horrible.   Yeah, I'm too scared of that. I'm not taking him. What about Rudy Cowart out of Auburn? He's 6'2 with elite strength, elite jumping, good speed, marginal Excel. So he's probably slow. I don't hate it. I would like a nice wide receiver here though. Got Enrique Garcia out of LSU with elite change of direction, solid speed. Much better skills. I like him better. This is a bit of a Hail Mary, but I'm taking Enrique Garcia also out of LSU. So he played with McAllister. Hey, hey. Yo, we got a Mexican wide receiver, Enrique Garcia. 6'3 out of LSU with insane change of direction. He's not fast, but he's 6'3 and he's hit, that's three hidden depths. Monster draft, no, four. Monster draft so far. I think I'll probably put him in the depth chart over Chase Claypool, maybe over Dino Mooney. My final selection will be Richard Johnson. He's still available. I just feel like the values here. I always do that. A guy drops really far and I'm like, oh, I should take him because he's good value. And then he ends up being normal depth. This is the fourth round. Richard Johnson, 90 speed, 94 excel, 6'1 corner. Hey, he's going to be in the lineup somewhere. Hopefully he's a high overall. Doesn't really look like it based on that. I like to let the CPU make some picks, especially when it's this deep. It's fun to see if they can pick up a heater. So I'm going to advance to the end of this draft. Let's see what we got here. The draft recap, gentlemen. The most important part are 2024 rookies. Oh my, oh my God. Yee-oh! Wait, this is the highest overall player I've ever drafted. Yee-oh! Dude, and he fell to five. I just think the teams in front of me didn't need a left tackle. That's me. Dude, and Chad Hardesty ended up being an excellent pick too. This was an ultra strong draft class.  The CPU picked Lidarius McCutchen out of UCLA, 74 overall, with 87 speed outside linebacker. Huge pickup. Townsend's trash, trainer's trash. Richard Johnson in the corner. So he's a high overall. He just, he just is normal dev. Enrique Garcia is a 76. Atkinson's a 75, McAllister's an 82. This is one of the best drafts I've ever done. No question is one of the best drafts I've ever done. So Chad Hardesty. Hey, by the way, please, in the comments, let me know what you think about this. I'd like to look at their dev trait. If you guys think this is cheating or I shouldn't be looking, just let me know. But I'm looking on this one. Chad Hardesty! Let's go! Generational. Generational talent. Superstar X Factor. 79 overall, Chad Hardesty. He was the clear cut round one pick one. So it kinda makes sense that it'd be him. But I'm just so glad we got him. Reed McAllister, if you're superstar, I'm gonna nut.  I'm the best GM that ever existed. All right, Jerry Atkinson.  Keep in mind, my draft class settings are set to strong for every position. Oh, he's star, darn it. Dude, if he was superstar, but still, I can't believe how well this draft line, especially Enrique Garcia, this was a shot in the dark. I thought this guy was gonna be a bum. Enrique Garcia, are you a superstar? He's a superstar! Oh my God!  And then Richard Johnson, we know he's normal. But did the CPU pick me up a hidden dev? Lidarius McCutchen.  Outside linebacker.  And then Alani Townsend. Yeah, it'd be insane if you were hidden dev, right? Okay. Well, let's see how the entire draft class was. Maybe this was just an ultra strong draft class. Oh my God, it was.  Look at this draft class. So Chad Hardesty went to us. Second pick was Richard Henry, who was also good. Either of the end options were good. Phil Duncan was an 81 out the gates. That boy is getting paid. Lyall Harper, 81. McAllister's 82. Chris Barrow. The corner that went to the saints has 97 speed. Devonte Palmer, hey, we got the right tackle though. This dude's a 74, then 76, 73, 74. So that's a weak spot, dead spot in the draft right there. That Aaron Bates corner, 80 overall. Lots of 74s and 73s. There's very top heavy draft. Montel Beckham, wide receiver for the bill. See, that's what's crazy. I got Enrique Garcia in the fourth round and he was a 76. This dude's a 70. He's hardly better. Garcia's a superstar. That was such an amazing pick. Amazing. Dude, that was such a good draft. Oh, I'm so excited about that. That's amazing. One big change I'll be making this year is my slot wide receiver is not gonna be DJ Moore. DJ Moore is going into his sixth year. He's awesome. He's still wide receiver one, but I know that that slot wide receiver is gonna get a lot of touches. I'm actually making it Enrique Garcia. Garcia's a rookie who is a superstar out the gates. They progress so fast.  And wow, my set looks so badass right now with that light in the back. I use natural lighting. I don't use any artificial lighting, so. Also, you know it's a bear's rebuild when it's gonna be nighttime I win the Super Bowl. Dude, look at this team. In one amazing draft and one amazing free agency, we have fully turned this team around. A beautiful developing offensive line. Tevin Jenkins is starting Morse from free agency at Consinima Callister from the draft and Darno Wright was a rookie last year. Comet's looking good. Enrique Garcia, can we talk about this guy? He's a superstar out of LSU. He's putting on for all my Mexicans. Let's go, baby. It was the last time you saw a Mexican wide receiver. Honestly, there could be a bunch and I wouldn't even know because I don't see color because I'm so racist. DJ Morse wide receiver won. Enrique Garcia, slot wide receiver. Darno Mooney's getting bumped down the depth chart. I do feel bad about that, but Garcia is just gonna progress a lot faster. And then defensively, Michael Pearson, free agency and Gakue is a solid option at right end, but really it's hardesty.  We still got Edwards, Edmonds and then Jack Sandborn. Or wait a minute, I do have a better outside linebacker because we drafted a hidden dev outside linebacker. I gotta move that in the depth chart. We actually did everything. We really did everything. So Jack Sandborn is gonna take a seat behind Lidarius McCutcheon. That's a madden name if I've ever seen one. Lidarius McCutcheon. All right, y'all. We're ready to sim to mid-season. Team's looking so good. Morale is reset. That's gonna be a really, really good year. Ooh, I'm so excited. Wow, I've never been so excited for a rebuild. Wait a minute. Halfway through the season, we're three and four. And remember when the Vikings were seven and zero at mid-season last year? Yeah, they're zero and six. I don't know, but already we're off to a much better season. It looks like we even got a weekly award. Yes, Edmonds with eight tackles and an interception. Not bad. Headed to the playoffs. Let's see if we end with a winning record. I don't expect to make the wild card, but it's possible we're three and four right now. 10 games left in the season. We could be a cheeky little nine and eight, nine and eight playoff team. Oh darn, my hopes and dreams. Hey, well, we went from two and 15 to seven and 10 in one short year. And importantly, I wanna see if our players developed well.  It's just the dev traits unlocking. So McAllister, Superstar, Enrique Garcia, he's up to an 83 already. DJ Moore's now a 91 and Darnell hasn't moved. Justin Fields, let's take a look at him. He's up to an 82 overall. He started at a 73, so he's plus nine overall already. Accuracies are so much better. Throw on the runs looking good. Short accuracy hitting 90. Under pressure's looking great. He's still fast as hell. You can't take his speed away from him. And then defensively, wow. Interesting, McCutcheon must not have seen the field as much. 457 snaps through the whole season. That can't be right. I must have something wrong in here. Probably specialist, but hardest thing we knew he was X factor Jalen Johnson's up to a 90. I gotta look at my specialist. I must be doing something wrong McCutcheon here. Need him to be a sub linebacker or slot corner. Let's move Kyler Gordon to slot corner. I rush right end. Ooh, hardest he was not at rush right end. Shit, that is a bummer. Definitely needed to do that earlier. That's okay. Look at how much of a difference these playbooks make. So Justin Fields went from 2,600 passing yards to 3,900. Oh, granted, he did have a much better offensive line and better wide receiver threats, but it's literally all in the playbook. Like for him to be now the eighth, most passing yards quarterback after being literally dead last. Dead last this season is Will Leviss, although technically Derek Carr. Danny Dimes is down there, Brock Purdy, Jalen Hertz and Phil Duncan. The number one overall pick, Phil Duncan through 26 touchdowns or the first quarterback off the board, Phil Duncan through 26 touchdowns, only 12 interceptions. Nice. Actually, I'm impressed. On the ground, Khalil Herbert almost hit 1,000 yards, Justin Fields significantly less, but he did have three touchdowns. DJ Moore had the most, Garcia next, then Komet and then Darnamoney. That's almost exactly how I want it to look and evenly spread out those touchdowns. Defensively, it's Edwards with the most tackles. Then Edmunds briskers up there, seven interceptions for Tremaine Edmunds. I'm actually very shocked by that. Justin Jones had three sacks and almost no sacks. One sack out of Chad Hardesty. This is entirely my fault. I did not have him in at rush right end. She was a huge mistake. So I kind of, I honestly just completely messed up Chad Hardesties.  Dude, I botched Hardesties rookie year, but that's okay. Cause Hardesties already X factor. He's going to be awesome next year. I can't dwell on that. The Jaguars. Oh my God. The Jaguars win the Super Bowl. Devon Hamilton is the MVP and we don't win offensive or defensive rookie of the year. It's entirely my fault. I did not have my guys in the right position. I'm mad at myself, man. I should have been there. For anyone who was confused about where Braxton Jones was, I have no idea how I fumbled the bag on this, but I didn't even notice him in the depth chart. I don't know how I missed that. So I apologize, but I have moved Braxton Jones to center and he's going to hang out there. Cole Comet is up to superstar, which is awesome. He just got that in the 2024 season. Oh my God, what? Everybody's up. Edmunds is up to superstar. Edwards is up to superstar. Briskers up to superstar. Dude, this defense is getting crazy. Oh my God. We're definitely going to have to get a new right end cause Ngakwe is 30 years old now and he's only getting worse. So we can definitely target that in the draft. But other than that, gosh, this team looks so good. Actually, like it looks amazing. Not too worried about anything we might. Oh, what's he going to take to get Jesse Bates off the Falcons?  Now let's get someone younger, let him develop. I'd like to get a stud safety that's going to progress a lot better. My target is CJ Gardner Johnson from the Lions. He's already in 89 overall. I'll offer Eddie Jackson and a second rounder and I'll see what more they want than that. What? Oh my, I don't, dude, I don't know. I guess I'm the worst GM in the world. I don't know how they're taking this trade. I thought for sure this was a low ball. That actually like literally takes the fun out of the rebuild for me. That's so unrealistic. There is no way that the commander should be trading Chase Young for a first round, right? Or am I a casual? Eric Stokes wants to be a Chicago bear. I would love to beef up the corners. We are probably going to get Greg Newsom. I don't think we need Eric Stokes. I do want a kicker. Good kickers are actually pretty important. Who's available? Evan McPherson, that's like the exact guy you want. It's expensive, but it's a kicker. So it's really not that expensive. I'm gonna offer him a heater. See if he signs, let him eval. Yeah, he signed with us. He's already with us. Let's go. So Newsom signs and our kicker signs. Still got a lot of cap. Take me to the draft. Take me to the draft. I got Chase Young. I got CJ Gardner Johnson. I got Newsom. I got Evan McPherson. We didn't unload all our picks and I still over traded. Like I still, I still gave up too much. I don't get it, man. I've done like 10 rebuilds now and I don't get it. Headed into season three. This team has so much talent on it. Such an awesome offensive line. Superstar Komet, Garcia, DJ Moore, Justin Fields. Then defensively, dude, we made some insane adjustments. Chase Young, Hardesty. Got Stevenson, Johnson, Greg Newsom. And of course, CJ Gardner Johnson. Those trades were nuts. Sorry, the sun is now clapping me in the face. The natural light isn't as cool anymore. Gardner Johnson, Chase Young. We are chilling, boys. We are chilling. Not my best draft, but honestly, I don't think it matters. This team is ready to go win.  Ayo, mid season. We got a winning record, ladies and gentlemen. We're four and two, but I think even cooler, I see a breakout wide receiver right here. Get Enrique Garcia four touch. Oh, dude, that is a lot though. So if Enrique Garcia has a monster game, he'll go up to Superstar X Factor. Right now, the Packers are four and two. We're four and two and the Vikings are four and three. So it's a dog fight in the NFC North right now. We're kind of a lock for the playoffs this time around. That's fire. Dude, the Bears are up to a 91 overall. Oh my God. Oh my God, we got a buy. Dude, for a second there, I was like, wait a second. We didn't even make the wild card. So we're 12 and five. We get a buy in the wild card.  Enrique Garcia's a monster. That was my fourth round pick. Dude, this guy's such a beast. Justin Fields continues to improve 4,450 passing yards this season, 35 and 15. On the ground, Khalil Herbert finally got 1,000 yards and 11 touchdowns. Fields had 440. Receiving Enrique Garcia 15 touchdowns, 1,200 yards. Comet 1,107. So two receivers over 1,000 yards and Moore had 890 and eight. He has definitely taken a little bit of a back seat. I didn't realize just how dominant Enrique Garcia was going to be just by being slot wide receiver, but he has fully taken over. And now that I finally properly am using Chad Hardesty 10 sec season, that's amazing. Chase, I only got four. I'm actually shocked at how ineffective Chase Young was, but it doesn't matter when Chad Hardesty is doing it. Two for TJ Edwards, two for Michael Pierce. Great season all around for us. So somehow Trenton Gill is my field goal kicker. Even though I signed Evan McPherson, I have to adjust the depth chart on my kickers, don't I? That's an oversight. To this day in my rebuilds, I've never won the Super Bowl in this year. Like the third year I've never done it. I always went in the fourth or beyond would be sick if we got it right now. I'd be really excited if we get it right now. 91 overall Chicago Bears, taking on the 88 overall Carolina Panthers. I just realized my only X Factor player, Chad Hardesty, that's it. A buy in the wild card, our first playoff game is the divisional round taken on the Carolina Panthers. Actually, my last rebuild was the Panthers. I love to see this. Look at this. Look at Bryce Young facing off with Justin Fields. Starting out with a Chicago touchdown, a Panthers field goal, a Panthers touchdown. Oh, this is gonna be close, 14-13, 17-13, 16-17.   Third corner's got 45 seconds left. It's 24 to 24, Bears on offense. Justin Fields hanging out in the pocket. Throws, where are you throwing? There is a penalty, I think. I think that's DPI. I think that's coming back. Pass interference on the defense or roughing the passer. They allow of the century, the Bears playoffs hopes could have literally just ended, but they get a roughing the passer. We hand off to Khalil Herbert who has six rushes for 10 yards. He is going nowhere against this Panthers defense. Second and three, play action. Oh, hit, Herbert. Dude, where are you throwing? That was a horrible drop. You gotta catch that.  Oh my God, coach runs a pitch play on third and three in the, it's a 50 yard field goal. Oh my God, that was just pitiful. Luckily I did actually sub Evan McPherson in and that's so crucial that I did because I don't think our punter could hit a 50 yard field goal. McPherson's gonna absolutely drill it.  God, a pitch on third and three. I'm so mad about that. The Panthers are into Bears territory with two minutes and 30 seconds left on the clock and he Chad Hardesty and Chase Young to get to Bryce Young. He checks down, he's tackled in bounds. Hands it off. Oh, what a move. Jalen Johnson juked out of his, Jalen Johnson just got put on a highlight reel by Miles Sanders. No, 31 to 24. That's gonna put the Panthers up by four. It's a touchdown or we, it's a touchdown or we're going home. The clock is ticking. Justin Fields checks down, get out of bounds. God, Fields has 350 yards and three touchdowns and we're losing by four. That's really on our defense, dude. It really is on our defense. Fields drops back, checking down again to commit. We don't got the clock for this. You run a draw?  Well, okay, that no huddle was pretty quick. All right, maybe the draw was a decent play. Justin Fields rolling out, throws a laser. Caught, oh, that's huge. DJ Moore catches it, gets out of bounds. 52 seconds left, 26 yards to go. Oh my God, we really could do it right here. First and 10, hit him, hit him, hit him. Yes, DJ Moore over the middle, timeout bears. Second and four, Justin Fields drops back. Who's open? Moore again, same play. He goes, Herbert, do we use the timeout? The clock is ticking.  No way you took that long to spike it. No way you took that long to spike it. Okay, he's dropping back. He throws, and 10 at least, the clock is stopped. Fields steps up, Fields third and inches.   You have to pass this. Yes, I should have drafted Phil Duncan.  You know what, low key, I'm being a baby. I'm being a baby. This was insane to be 12 and five at this point in the season. It's insane to be 12 and five at this point in the rebuild, I should say. Awesome game. Great game, Panthers, God damn it. Oh, we were really right there. That's crazy. Panthers, you better go on all the way to win the Super Bowl. God, we had 400 yards of offense. Dude, two interceptions from Fields that we got bailed out on the first one. So that's basically just karma. Did the Panthers, oh my God, they did. Oh, they did. You know, this is actually a good sign because if that Panthers team beat the Chiefs and I damn near beat that Panthers team, it's pretty obvious they are here. Dude, Mathias McLaughlin, that 98 speed running back from the draft. He wins offensive rig of the year, which makes sense. Actually, the Chargers got offensive and defensive rig of the year, damn. The Jets coach was the coach of the year. Lots of stuff is happening in this one. And yes, guys, like I said, it's a bear's rebuild. So we went from daylight to fully nighttime now. Yeah. Oh my God, I didn't even notice. Comet Superstar X Factor. Enrique Garcia probably got his breakout that if he's Superstar X Factor, it feels looking like a monster. DJ Moore looking like a monster. Moody's looking amazing. O-line's great. Khalil Herbert leaves in free agency. So we need a running back. Technically could reassign him. Jalen Johnson gets Superstar X Factor. Brisker Newsom is now Superstar. This defense is nuts, man. Michael Pierce has regressed significantly though. So my detack was no longer as good as it once was. But I mean, this is our Super Bowl year right here. We got 90 million cap too. Let's just nuke. Dude, let's just get some monster free agents. Travis Kelsey's available. But no, Comet's literally Travis Kelsey, but honestly, probably better. Travis Jones out of Connecticut looks like he does want to sign with us. He's only 26, that's pretty young. So nice young detack of free agent. We'll take him. I mean, this free agency is not very impressive though, I'll be honest. I guess I like Trey Hendrickson, but I got Chase Young. I don't really need any of these guys. That's crazy that there's nobody I really want. Tyler Algear is nice, but I could just trade for a back. Free agency is pretty weak, but that's also not true. My team is just so good that free agency doesn't do me much good unless there's like a 90 plus overall detackle in there. As far as getting a half back, I either trade for an absolute superstar amazing half back or I just use some draft capital on one right now. Round one pick 28, we have a decision to make. Do we draft a half back or do we trade for one using this first round pick? Let's see what the half backs look like. There's Cam Turner and there's Deshaun McCann. Cam Turner is around one to two production. Deshaun McCann, round two to three. What do we think about Cam Turner? Six one out of South Carolina. He's got eight. Whoa, a lot of A's. A ton of A's. Scouting report, okay. Whoa, this guy's so freak. Elite speed, elite jump, elite change direction, elite excel. Yo, what? Dude, this guy's a dog, but he has a minus nine rank change. I can't pass him up, but I have a feeling he's normal dev because why would his rank drop? Oh my God, Cam Turner. Dude, I thought he was going to be normal dev. This guy's a monster. Cam Turner out of South Carolina is like Matthias McLaughlin, who won offensive rigging the year last year. 98 speed, 95 excel, he's hidden dev? Who is this guy? Dog, that's the only thing I wanted. I'm going to let the CPU take over for the rest. Dude, what? I've never drafted a running back that elite. I usually don't really draft running backs. So this is just new to see, but Khalil Herbert doesn't want to get paid, doesn't want to be a Chicago bear. So it's Cam Turner, dude, what? Dude, he's got to be at least like a 77 overall. He has to be a 77 overall. The moment of truth, Cam Turner. Okay, that has to be like the single highest overall possible.  South Carolina, Cam Turner.  He came out the gates, top 12% of hatbacks. This is like Bijan Robinson. Stiff arm, change of direction, Jude. Oh my God. This is the bear's organization's next Walter Payton.  This guy's insane. CPU took a 74 strong safety, a 73 wide receiver, a 74 MLB, he's probably hidden dev. Yeah, Tevin Snell, they got Austin Sprinkle, who's a hidden dev wide receiver and Richard Meeks, normal dev strong safety. Not a bad draft at all. Let's take a look around the entire league. Round one pick one was an 83 overall wide receiver. So this is just a much stronger class than the last one, which is crazy because it's still on strong. 80 overall QB, Greg Mayan, damn, he's a much, there's no 86. Dude, he's like far and beyond the best player in the draft. I've never done that before. 86? That literally has to be the highest possible. I'm Googling it. 86 overall. I'm on the Reddit right now. I've drafted an 86 overall halfback and an 86 overall cornerback in a few separate franchises.  So I guess it could be a little bit higher, but dude, that's in, he's 98 speed. That's so awesome. Well, so there's just a ton of 79, 78, 77s, but there's a huge drop off. There's only three 80 pluses, which is Mayan, David Holly and Cam Turner. That was purely situational. I only took him because he was the best halfback available. I didn't, I didn't really scout him. Hey, well that is amazing, boys. That's just the depth chart.  He's about to have a monster season. I almost want to like change my playbook so we can get more use. Nah, Khalil Herbert did a thousand yards with Chiefs. That's so crazy to me. You know, I can't believe I didn't even check. I didn't even check if Cam Turner is, I figure if you're this high of an overall, you have to be superstar, right? Like at least that or he's probably superstar X factor. I drafted two superstar X factors in this class. I'm literally the greatest GM that's ever lived.  Yeah, Terry, Terry, Terry, Terry was a bad pick, but we make up for it with our Cam Turners with our Chad Hardesties. We make up for it. And I didn't even draft the Detect, which is like totally what I was supposed to draft. Let me actually make sure he is the running back at every position. Third down running back. Oh yeah, here we go. Cam Turner, Cam Turner, slot wide receiver can continue to be Enrique Garcia. Yes. 20-26 season, we're 13 and four. So not as good of a record, but obviously our schedule is a lot harder. Dude, we're a 94 overall. And look who we're playing. We're playing the Panthers again. Dude, we're a 94 overall. That's insane. I've never had an overall that high. That's thanks to Cam Turner being a 97 overall. This guy's gone. That's literally the single greatest draft pick I've ever made. No question. Oh my God, look how stacked this team is. Disgusting.  Interestingly enough though, Justin Fields regresses in yards and he still has a good amount of interceptions. Justin Fields is like the only guy on this team who's not progressing that fast. Cam Turner, 1,400 yards, 20 touchdowns. You think he won offense of Ricky of the Year? Damn near, could have won MVP. 1,000 yards, nine touchdowns for Garcia. Yeah, you know, it's funny. Like it's Justin Fields is the only guy who's struggling. Chase Young got five sacks, hardest day at three and a half. So a regression on defense too. Oh, I guess we're running the ball so effectively we're just not passing as much because of Cam Turner. This dude is almost a 99 overall in one season. I've never seen that. This is the highest overall I've ever had. 94 overall Chicago Bears with Jalen Johnson, hardest theme, Cam Turner with a playoff rematch against the Carolina Panthers. Wonder if this will even be a game. Or do we kind of just blow them out here? Starting out 7-0 Bears, 7-7, 10-7, 17-7.  Whoa, high scoring game, 24-14, 21-24, 31-21. And I think we're just ending it. Yes, let's go Bears. We honestly made that one easy. There was never really a point for me to come in and watch. But hey, I want to see Cam Turner get a handoff. I do want to see that. Oh, throw it to him. Justin Fields are so great. Oh my God, deja vu. But he gets in this time. Like the same down in distance. Except honestly, this time it didn't matter. Like we were just stat padding at that point. 38 to 21.  Last time Justin Fields did that, he got stuff. Oh, 38-21. Finally getting past our rivals, the Carolina Panthers. The Chicago Bears have their first playoff win, beating our rivals, the Carolina Panthers. So the Panthers won the Super Bowl last year. That's gotta be a good sign for us here. Justin Fields with a master class, four touchdowns, 145.6 QBR, Cam Turner, 5.1 yards per carry and seven broken tackles. Somebody, oh my God. He's going to want to get paid. Up next is the divisional. Taking on the Atlanta Falcons, 89 overall. What is their team? What is this Falcons roster looking like? They got 99 Jesse Bates, 99 Linus Schirm, 99 Pitts, 99 Bijan, 97 AJ Terrell, Drake London, got Brett Parker, D-Tackle, who's the quarterback? Still Desmond Ritter. I am shocked by that. All right, we're taking on Desmond Ritter in the divisional. Will this one be a good game? Looks like the Bears are going to march 7-0. We're going to march again. 14-7, they scored quick. 21-7 is a super high scoring game. We just got stopped there. 28-14, 28-17. Oh, I think we just pieced them apart the same way we pieced apart the Panthers. We pieced apart the Falcons and we're throwing in a field goal just to make them feel bad. That's disrespectful, but I like it. Stamp at all you want, 31-7. I guess the game's not over until it's over. 31-17, McPherson's going to drill this. Wow, another no-sweater. Although I guess, I don't know.  So I'm not exactly worried about the Falcons doing it to us. 17-31, let's see Desmond Ritter's final play. You got to heave that bitch, Desmond.  See what he's got. Dropping back, dropping way back. Don't you just love that checking down in the divisional championship down by 14 and truly the final play from Desmond Ritter, Bijan and this Atlanta Falcons team, the divisional playoff, a cake walk for the Bears but he unloads. Dude, that was open. Desmond Ritter, not the game. And what do you know? Was that the same score? No, we had 38-21 in the first one. 31, but we are dropping a lot of points in these games.  Ritter played pretty good. 17 for 28, 200 yards, two touchdowns in the interception but not as good as Fields. 275, three tutties, no interceptions. And Cam Turner, Cam Turner is the reason for all of this, man. 15 for 81, 5.4 yards for Kerry and touchdown and four broke. Man, he's so good. And you know, I never checked the yearly awards. Was Cam Turner up here for MVP? Oh, he never was up here. That's actually a bummer. He was fourth in offensive player of the year voting. I thought he'd be higher. Greg Newsom and TJ Edwards were in it for defensive player of the year. Cam Turner definitely got offensive rookie of the year though. Onto the NFC Championship, gentlemen. Oh, oh my God, oh my God. Oh my, I've never seen this. The Dallas Cowboys are 17 and oh?  This is the last rebuild that was going undefeated. The Cowboys are trying to go undefeated right now. Whoa, we are a 95 overall roster though. I think my team is so brokenly overpowered that like I don't think it matters how good the Cowboys are. You ever seen a 95 overall in a rebuild? I have never seen a team this high overall. And I didn't even like, I didn't even fully unload my picks or anything. I could still trade away so many picks and even technically make this team better. Got a nice upgrade. So Tremain Edmunds is about to be a 95 with this upgrade. I'm gonna give him Field General, technically a 98 with Murrell. Told team is so good. How do the Cowboys look? 99 CD, 99 Trayvon Diggs, 99 Micah. I noticed in a lot of franchise Sims the Cowboys do nothing. They, all they do is just re-sign their players and they're insane. I mean, I would too, but you never see any big changes. This is literally just the Cowboys roster except way better. Wow, the Cowboys are looking for an undefeated. The first ever 20 and oh season. But they've got to get through the 95 overall Chicago Bears to do so. They do have home field advantage. I like our odds. Here we go, y'all. Opening drive, Bears score. Oh, we didn't convert on that one, seven to seven. Cowboys are marching 14 to seven. Seven, dude, what? 14 to seven. Oh, we stopped them? 21, 17.  Chicago's got the ball first to 10. NFC Championship to stop the Cowboys. Cinderella run, a laser. Cole Comet, he's still going. Dude, we're almost going too fast. The Cowboys are gonna be able to score now. Run the ball, no. Why are we in five wide? Get some clock. Justin Veil just out of me. First and goal. We're on the two. Give it to our generational running back. Please, let me see Cam Turner. Cam Turner in the backfield. Cam Turner, the handoff, stuffed. Oh no, and we can't just take a field goal. We got to get a touchdown. Dropping back. It's a screen. Cam Turner breaks a tackle. We got to hold the Cowboys for a minute 12 with three timeouts. Let's go, boys. Cam Turner, the generational running back drafted this year. That's a rook. He breaks a tackle from Layton Vandoresh. It takes it into the end zone. You're a monster, bro. Cowboys take over on what is likely their final drive. This determines who goes to the Super Bowl. The Chiefs beat the Jaguars, I think is what I'm seeing down there. I don't know if that was the divisional or if that's the ASC championship right there. Really bad play right there from the Cowboys. Through it inbounds, check down. Clock's ticking, they don't use a timeout. We'd love a sack. Another low throw, broken up. By TJ Edwards or is that Tramiel Evans? I think that's TJ Edwards. Actually, that might have been Gendarius McCutcheon. I don't know, but it's third and seven if we can get to the QB here. He goes play action. They've got a lot. Oh, intercepted, intercepted by CJ Gardner Johnson. No, are Greg Newsome? CJ Gardner Johnson. We poached him off the Lions for Eddie Jackson in a draft pick. Eddie makes the NFC championship ceiling INT. Oh, that's primetime, Dak Prescott for you, baby. Let's go. Now we're trotting out the offensive rookie of the year. Best running back in the league. Cam Turner to power this puppy home. Takes it for five. If anybody could do it, it's Cam Turner. Cam Turner's gonna cut it up and Micah Parsons is having none of it. Cam Turner, ooh, play action, roll out, what?   My coach is so... That was literally an interception. Like, Vanarash is choking this game away. We're gonna take a field goal here with Evan McPherson. So, dude, that was such a bad play goal because not only do we not get it, but it was incomplete. It's an incomplete pass, so they retain a timeout. You just run that ball. Even if you don't get it, you force them to call a timeout. Now they have one timeout and 34 seconds. I don't think they're gonna get it. I don't think they'll get a touchdown out of this. But why risk this? They're forced to return it. It's gonna take some clock off and the return team is all over that. Four seconds burn. They only get to the 19, great work. First and 10, Dak unloads to a wide open tight end. They use their only timeout. They have to get in the end zone. That timeout, ooh, using the timeout there is kind of crazy actually. If he throws anything or gets sacked, Chase Young, Chase Young just made the play of the game. They're in Hail Mary now. Chase Young made the play of the game. He's gonna check down. What are you doing? That's ball game. Oh my God, coach wants to lose so bad. What was that? But hey, it doesn't matter. A dub is a dub. Chase Young gets home to deck with no timeouts left. They're forced to run. You know what? I shouldn't be surprised. I've seen the Cowboys in real life run the shittiest final play of the game I've ever seen. Dude, Dak had insane stats. 389 yards, two touchdowns, two interceptions. It's Cam Turner, man. This is the difference maker, Cam Turner. This isn't even one of his best games, but still solid. Justin Fields, nine for 48, 5.3, and a touchdown on the ground. We squeak past the Dallas Cowboys. Oh, that was so scary.  Cam Turner on the screen. He breaks the tackle off of Van Der Resch. That's what's even cooler about that. Cam Turner actually gets an upgrade here. That's gonna take him to a 96 overall, technically a 99 with morale. Gets Excel, ball carrier vision. Looks like somewhere along the way we got a speed upgrade, because that is a 99 speed, 96 Excel. Oh, he's so good. Top 2% of halfbacks in the league in his first year. They just don't build them like that anymore, gentlemen. They just don't build them like Cam Turner. It's time for the Super Bowl. There's only one thing between us and a complete video, and that's the Super Bowl. Of course, we see the Chiefs here. 13 and four bears taken on the 14 and three Chiefs. They're kind of hanging with us overall-wise. They're 92, we're 95. Gonna take a look at the Chiefs roster. Usually in these Sims, the Chiefs don't change how much either. I'm pretty sure Rashi Rice is gonna be insane. It's usually Sims so well. Chris Jones still there, 99. Bolton's a 99. Humphries a 99. Pacheco 99. Rashi Rice, 98. Yeah. McDuffie's a 97. Tracemus a 95. And they got Alonzo Bonn, free safety. He's a superstar. Nice draft pick. They got Easton, Martin, Titan, also a superstar. They had to replace Travis Kelsey, and they did very well doing so. All right, Chiefs. Gentlemen, I don't think we can ask for much more in the Super Bowl. We're taking on a 92 overall Chiefs team. Chris Jones, Rashi Rice. Patrick Mahomes, we got Jalen Johnson, Cam Turner, Chad Artisty. Oh, the draft, man. The draft built this team and the trades just made it even better. We find ourselves in the Super Bowl. Hard Rock Stadium. The Bears taking on the Kansas City Chiefs, guys. I'm pretty sure this is a real life Super Bowl preview. You can expect to see this IRL. Opening drive, Bears score. And again, 10-0, 10-3. Dude, no way. We're not gonna blow them out in the bowl, right? 31 to 10, 41 to 10, 48 to 10. Oh my God, we're shitting on them. Oh my God, the Chiefs fans have left the building. The stadium is clearing. The dynasty is over. It's Bears dynasty now. Oh my God, there's no way. Cam Turner, master class. 11 rushes, 64 yards. He's averaging six yards a carry. Chicago's got 600 total yards. Does Justin Fields have 500 passing yards? Oh my God, he has 512 passing yards. We're shitting on the Chiefs. Hand off, Cam Turner, second and goal. Does it even matter? The Chiefs are getting blown out so bad that they're not even calling timeouts in the Super Bowl. We're basically in victory formation here. Second and goal. Come on, let's let Cam Turner punch one in. Let Cam Turner punch one in. Why not, right? Cam Turner, Cam Turner insult the injury. Oh my God. Did you bet the over in the Super Bowl, gentlemen? I think the Bears hit it by themselves. That's 55 points. Brothers, I've never built such a busted team. Dude, I swear to God, this team would be nothing without Cam Turner. Like Draft and Cam Turner took us from what would have been an amazing team to a full blown dynasty.  Taylor Swift is just devastated. She's devastated. She can't believe her pookie bear. Travis Kelsey just got waxed. Travis Kelsey actually retired in this franchise so he's not even out there, but. I know that him and T-Swift were watching. Watching as the Bears put up 55. Would that be a Super Bowl record, 55 in the Super Bowl? Maybe? I don't know. God damn, Justin Fields, I think he threw for 500.  Tell me you've ever seen this. 20 for 27, 512 passing yards, six touchdowns. No, that is the most unbelievable stat line I've ever seen. Justin Fields is not even one of my best players. Cam Turner still had an amazing game with a touchdown but who got all of our yards? Colcomet gets 70. Enrique Garcia, 177 three touchdowns. He low key could get Super Bowl MVP. It's probably still gonna be Fields, but three for 191 Cam Turner. Oh my God, that's why. Three for 191 Cam Turner. This guy turned everything. Not even that we needed it to be turned around but Cam Turner ballooned this team. That's insane. That will go down as my best draft pick ever. I don't think I'll ever top that. Just with how impactful he was too. He just had three touchdowns and 300. No, 250 all-purpose yards in the Super Bowl. 2026 season recap, 55 bomb on the Chiefs. Justin Fields wins Super Bowl MVP, Chicago Bears win it all. Josh Allen gets NFL MVP, Cam Turner of course, offensive rookie of the year, there was no question. I could see Cam Turner winning MVP. Like he could win MVP of the league at some point here. I probably need to switch my playbook, make it a little more running back dominant, but still, what an absurd, absurd season. Wow, 13 and four, take it all the way to the bowl and win it. And before I go anywhere, I want you to see the final lineup and then I'm gonna sim five years in the future and see if this dynasty holds up. Cam Turner, 99, Justin Fields amazing. What a draft pick there. DJ Moore developed amazingly, Enrique Garcia developed even better. Darnell Moody, still solid. Hey, he got a ring. He can't be mad that he got moved to Y receiver three. McAllister, awesome offensive lines just looking so good. Very happy with Braxton Jones for not bitching about getting moved to center. Darnell Wright, cold combat superstar X Factor 96 overall. Then defensively we've got our very first round one pick one. Chad Hardesty, amazing player. Greg Newsom went up to superstar X Factor. I don't even know that till right now. Jalen Johnson, superstar X Factor. CJ Gardner Johnson, wow, I have a lot of Johnson's. CJ Gardner Johnson with a huge interception that NFC championship. TJ Edwards developed great admins of course too. Ladarius McCutcheon really didn't develop that much or do much but you know what? He's got a ring too. Jaquan Briskar, superstar Chase Young, superstar Michael Pierce, just happy to be here. Same with Jaden Turner. They got a ring. What a squad. All right, boys. I'm gonna send five years into the future. Let's see what this team does. We're 94 overall. I still have a lot of draft picks. I hardly traded that many away at all. We should be a dynasty. 229, wait, Desmond Ritter wins Super Bowl MVP. Hey, he got his get back, bro. Desmond Ritter got his get back in 29. In 28, wow. The Saints win it and the Chiefs go back. So the Jaguars get it in 27. I'm kind of annoyed that we never went back. 26 was it. Did we win any like awards? Do we win offensive play? Camp Turner wins offensive player the year though in 2029. So that's good news. What's the roster look like? We're still at 91 overall.  We drafted two X-Factor tight ends. The computer did? What? Look at the depth of tight end.  I've never seen that. Justin Fields is an X-Factor. Now Superstar X-Factor. Reed McAllister is a 99 and we have five Superstar X-Factors on defense. What is going on? I really built the greatest dynasty ever except we won no Super Bowls. This is the weirdest, the craziest email ever. But hey, I'm your embarrassment. I hope you loved it. All right, boys. That's it for today. I love you guys and I'll see you in the next one. Peace.