Hello from the heart of downtown Honolulu, Hawaii. I'm Michael North. I'm sitting in for David Chang on today's edition of The Art of Thinking Smart, in which we try to identify ways that people who have significant experience in government and in business in solving problems can share what they've learned over a lifetime. So we're really pleased to welcome a guest here today. He's one of Hawaii's leading citizens and is the former mayor of Honolulu. He's the 13th mayor of Honolulu in our life. He also served as the prosecuting attorney, the third elected prosecuting attorney. You served for 16 years, is that correct? Yes. And then served as mayor. And now you're back in the private sector again and doing all kinds of creative and interesting things. So it's kind of a good time for you to sort of hit pause at this moment and look back. And here's a question for you. Think back, you're from New Jersey, right? I am.  You have our sympathies. You're forgiven for all of New Jersey's sins because you've lived here for so long. Yes. How many years have you lived in Hawaii? Thirty-four, I believe now. Right. You have a nice house up in Hawaii Kai.  Yeah. You've snuck into the neighborhood. You have a view over everything. And you work for one of the leading law firms here in downtown Honolulu now. You've engaged in some interesting projects.  That's a long, long time ago. Yeah. Just, you know, a few years. Starting out. But you can remember. I can. Remember probably quite vividly where you were living, what you were doing, what you were thinking. And if you were like me, at 24, you were making all kinds of very interesting mistakes. Or you had ideas that might take you in directions that were not fully productive, right? Now, these empty bump years later, as you look back, what would you say to that young man? What advice would you give to that young man? Well, I think you sort of come into a period in your life where you think that you're going to be not solving the problems of the world, but basically telling people what they need to do correctly, when in fact you really don't know the answer to that question. And you are far more aggressive, as most young men are, and sometimes too drawn to having attention drawn to yourself. And those types of views dissipate more and more. And you learn, I think we both know, that it's far more valuable to listen, if you're in a position of authority, than it is to constantly be speaking or barking orders. So listening. Listening is a big part of maturity. It's also a big part of leading people in a direction that they're leaning towards, and it's going to be advantageous to themselves as well as their community. Right. Yeah, you definitely have a reputation of being a good listener. I do that largely because if I don't listen to my wife, all purgatory breaks loose very quickly. Well, she's taught you very much. Very valuable. I'm an indentured servant to the woman. Can you transmit that sort of skill in the rest of your life too? I hope so. You have clients in your law firm, and the key to being a successful attorney, or a successful prosecuting attorney, or a successful mayor, I think, is listening to many, many voices. And then what do you do once you've heard, once you've listened, then what? Well, then the job is to analyze what's being requested, try to understand what the client wants, and then if what they want is impractical, impossible, or extremely difficult, or too expensive, then you have to convince them of a different path to take that will be more beneficial for them. And so it's really, client control is something that lawyers talk a lot about. If you can assist your client in getting to a place that's to their great advantage, but it requires the skill of pointing them that in direction and controlling them to get to that particular point, then that's something that you need to be able to do. And that, I think, comes with maturity. And does that apply in the political realm as well? When you think of what you just said as the mayor, you have many constituencies in the public, you've got the press, you've got your city council, you've got your own administration, all of whom have their own ideas and their own egos and so on. It's a complicated juggling. It is, and the problem is that, really, the way that you get to be the mayor who is an administrator of something like 10,000 people, that's where your skills as basically a leader come into play. But to get to that position, you have to play the political game. And the political game is, I mean, it's notorious for by-lie and plagiarize. And that's the game of politics, and we've seen it certainly in the last election cycle in terms of what people were saying before they got into the position and after they got into the position. So those things are very problematic if you don't like playing those types of political games and you're not willing to engage in the by-lie or plagiarize.  I would say most definitely. I think that there are, I don't believe in micromanagement. I don't believe in power and control and leadership. And I think those people who adopt the idea that we're all in this business and we're all working together, I just happen to be the person who is at the top of the food chain or I have the title. But frankly, you're going to be the people who make the business successful. And that's exactly what's going to happen if you're in a position such as the mayor. If you put the right people around you, then those people are going to make the city run smooth, well, and efficiently and cost-effectively. I always relate very closely to an expression that comes out of the Dao De Jing, which is the most ancient book of Chinese philosophy, the book from which all the other works of philosophy come. And Lao Tzu says, when the job of the great man is complete, the people say we did it ourselves. You know, that's exactly correct. That makes all sorts of sense. And I believe that that's really the type of leadership that is needed in today's modern societies to move us forward to a place of smart thinking, which is what you're talking about now. So thinking back to that young Peter Carlisle, that twenty-four-year-old. He had a lot more hair, you know, the body frame was a little different, and the joints were a lot more mobile.  I hadn't surfed by then. That started at fifty. Well, thinking back to that, okay, so now you've said, young Peter, listen, learn to listen. What other art of thinking smart can you relay to him now that he would profit from? Well, I think a lot of that had to do with my career path, one becoming a lawyer and two becoming a prosecutor. And to get the right type of people in the prosecutor's office who can assist in law enforcement and to help make our society a safer place, you have to have people who are willing not to be in it for the money, because you're going to be making a whole lot more money in the private sector.  And that's not the kind of person who you want in the prosecutor's office. You want somebody who is willing to take a cut if they're somebody who's experienced in pay, and you want them to do it for the purpose of making your community safer. So you would say, Peter, don't do it for the money. Do it for the... Well, actually for the love of the work and also for the greater good of the community. And always, always, we have in America a fairly short attention span looking forward to only about six months. We'd be a lot better off to do long-term thinking and long-term planning, which I know there are, that does happen in the United States on a number of occasions, but perhaps not as frequently or as far reaching as we would want it to do. I think the rail project, which has been tremendously controversial, is an idea of looking well into the future and knowing that it's going to be benefiting other members of our community. That was certainly true for H3. That was certainly true for the widening of Kalani-Anioli Highway. We used to have horrific, horrific traffic jams at that one little neck where it went from four lanes down to two, and now that's been completely alleviated, and the rail system is to help those people who haven't been given the benefit of those types of projects, and that's West Oahu. So in order to achieve something like that, you have to be able to convince people that they need to be able to invest in the future and accept the cost and the inconvenience and so on now in favor of a further goal in the future, and you have to be able to sustain that vision. How do you do that? Yes, but you're also telling them, look, you're not going to be getting a direct benefit from this because you've already been taken care of, and now it's your time to basically assist your fellow citizens, your brothers and sisters here in Hawaii or here in Honolulu specifically, with the problem that they have in terms of the drive from basically that side to get to the university or to get to downtown is tailor-made for human suffering. I know, I used to take it all the time. And so it's time for the rest of us to say, hey, look, you were there, you helped fund the widening of Kalani-Anioli Highway, you helped fund H3 for the windward side, and now it's our turn to help you be able to have an alternative where you can get what now takes you two hours going and coming is going to take you 45 minutes. But that's leadership. It's convincing people to go from I-Me-Mind this short term, how does it affect me to seeing a broader community vision that we're all part of? I think that that's a form of the type of smart thinking that you're talking about. When you start thinking about universal goals, first off, beyond the city, beyond the state, beyond the country, and then internationally, that's what we want to look at. And we have so reduced the amount of time between our being able to speak to people in other locations almost automatically as opposed to when we used to have the Western riders who were bringing in their telegrams across the plains. It's a different world. Yes, the Pony Express. So now we're going to take a break here with the Pony Express, and we'll come back. Enthusiastic. St. Tech, Hawaii, Asia in reveal. I am Johnson Choi, the host. Looking forward to see you next month, December 15, Thursday, 11, right here at this channel. Aloha. Aloha. My name is Danelia, D-A-N-E-L-I-A. And I'm the other half of the duo. John Newman, welcome. We are co-hosts of a show called Keys to Success, which is live on the ThinkTech Live Network series, weekly on Thursdays at 11 AM. We're looking forward to seeing you then. Aloha. Aloha. My name is Josh Green. I serve as Senator from the Big Island on the Kona side, and I'm also an emergency room physician. My program here on ThinkTech is called Health Care in Hawaii. I'll have guests that should be interesting to you twice a month. We'll talk about issues that range from mental health care to drug addiction to our health care system, and any challenges that we face here in Hawaii. We hope you'll join us. Again, thanks for supporting ThinkTech. 24. OK, we're back now with Peter Carlisle, thinking smart with our former mayor. Peter, we were just talking about the young Peter and where he was and what he was doing when he was 24. And we just figured, oh, you were at UCLA. I was going to law school? We were graduating law school. I was? It was the mid to late 70s. Correct. So you were a young dude in Southern California in the heart of the disco age. Remember? I recall some of that, most of which I tried, tried, tried to rega it. So. Oh, please. I think you just broke the tube. You've got to do that shot with the arm, OK? John Travolta. So remembering him clearly now, the John Travolta version of Peter Carlisle, what further do you have to say to him? We've talked about listening, and we've talked about not thinking short term. We've talked about acting in terms of principle. So that's one and two. What's a third idea that we can relate to that young man? Well, I don't think he'd gotten over the phase where he thought of self first. And I think that that came later. It became more and more obvious as I was in law school. They had a quarter away program, which meant that you could leave the school and go to other locations. And you would get credit for the hours, but you wouldn't get a grade. And I had two options. And one was to, and I always knew that I was interested in the criminal law. So I could go to Alaska and work in the public defender's office, at which point they would have given me $2,000 a month to do that. Or I could go to Honolulu, Hawaii, and work in the prosecutor's office and give me, I think it was $400 a month. So it was a dramatic change. But it was a decision that I made faster than the speed of light. Because I knew that I wanted to be a prosecutor more than I wanted to defend people who I knew had preyed on other people. Yet we're presumed innocent, of course. Of course we're presumed innocent. There has to be a process. But once the process is served, then you have the option with people who have done particularly bad things to have them isolated from their other members of the community. So do we say to young Peter, go with your heart? I'd say that's what, yeah. I'd say it was mostly heart. And certainly a part of it was mind as well.  And that was what I wanted to do. And these days, you can hardly never do that in the private sector. Back then you could. So I've done some civil cases too, but not during that period of my life. But that was what I wanted to be able to do. And I was happy that I was given the opportunity. I always thought that what I would really like to be able to do is to have a very large murder case or a murder case and try it to conviction and get an appropriate sentence for the defendant. And that happened very quickly within a couple of years, actually, as a prosecutor. But then after that, it was moving through the ranks to be able to teach other people how to do it and ultimately to lead the office. Hello, I'm Mary Ann Sasaki. Welcome to Think Tech Hawaii, where some of the most interesting conversations in Honolulu go on. I have a show on Wednesdays from one to two called Life in the Law, where we discuss legal issues, politics, governmental topics, and a whole host of issues. I hope you'll join me. Aloha. My name is Carl Campania, and I am the host of Think Tech Hawaii's Movers, Shakers, and Reformers, the Politics in Hawaii series. Join us each week as we have guest after guest talking about the policy and the politics of our state, of our islands, and of what really matters to each of us. So please, join us each week and engage in that conversation. Mahala. OK, coming back to Peter. So here I see you're here. Let's ask this in the other direction. OK, let's see.  Well, I'm the host, man. Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. You get to be toasted as well as the rest of us, so. OK, OK, what would I say to the 24-year-old? First off, where were you and what were you doing? I was in Toronto, and I was teaching at the university, and I was in the publishing business as well. I had run a restaurant for some time, and I had bought and sold my first two or three pieces of real estate. So I was kind of getting into my business mode, and I would say that I was driven by opportunities. Whatever came to me, I would react, and I would pick it up, and I would immediately go for it. So I would say to that young man, learn to say no. It's important to say yes to the right things, but the majority of opportunities that come across your bow are going to be no's. So take the time to listen carefully, evaluate, look at long-term goals, and look at consistency of the things that you're doing. Try to group them in a way that makes sense, and that makes an identity, and move in that direction, and say yes to those things. I would also say work with people you know and trust and feel akamai with. I didn't know the word akamai, the Canadian guy in Toronto, but the meaning is clear. And sometimes in search of an opportunity, you'll work with somebody that you know has flaws, that you know has questionable this, that, and the other, but the opportunity is so great that you want to grab it anyways, and you figure you can control the circumstances. I would say to that young guy, you can't. Go with the people you know that you trust. Did you have any idea that you would end up in Honolulu, Hawaii and spend your life here and be married to a beautiful Chinese lady? No. And did any of that cross your mind? Not in the slightest. Did you think it was even slightly possible? Not in the most distant view of anything conceivable. Interesting. I was an East Coast guy. I'd spent a lot some time in New York, even at 24. And I knew that I wanted to go to New York. I knew I wanted to make my mark on Fifth Avenue and Wall Street. So I knew I was going around. The city that never sleeps. Yeah. Yeah. I bought the whole Frank Sinatra riff. And I was a Yankees fan and everything. And I did do that. And I'm so grateful for the time that I've spent in New York and still have so many great friends there. And it's the greatest American city. And I still go there whenever I can. We've been there together. We have. And I do want to remind you that while you people in New York do have Ellis Island, the Statue of Liberty belongs to New Jersey. Oh, OK. Got that straight. So I'm thinking of the young prosecutor who's just gotten here. Let's roll forward a few years later. And you've established yourself in and you have a role in the courtroom now. I kind of got a theatrical sort of thing from you. Like when you said I wanted to be standing in front of a jury and pleading my case and winning it. I got a Hollywood kind of feel from, am I correct? I would say that that's perfectly accurate. So there are people who like to have attention. I happen to be one of them. And the attention that I would like to have had and was fortunate enough to get was to be able to actively assist the safety of a community through criminal prosecution of those people who have committed crimes. So you have a strong motivation for the protection of the community, protection of the helpless, the victim, and for justice for those who break the law. Yeah, and also to have a safe environment where people can thrive. And if you have a place that's ridden with crime and a decaying society, that's not good for the society whatsoever. So that's a passion that you followed. I always wanted to be glad you followed it and it led you right through the mayorship and now to where you're in a productive post-political career. Correct. One thing that I really admire about your career is that you've been post-partisan your entire political career. Right. You've been friends with Democrats and working closely. You've been friends with Republicans and working closely, but not always carrying one flag or the other, carrying sort of the flag of the common interest. Actually, we sort of started the whole idea of a nonpartisan with Chuck Marslin, who was my boss. And the idea is that crime isn't Republican or Democrat. It's basically something that's nonpartisan. And that spread throughout the city. It ended up moving from the prosecutor's office to city council to the mayor's job. So the idea of nonpartisanship was always something that I held dear. And I felt that it was a far more productive way of handling criminal justice. Obviously, the people sense that. They recognize that. They appreciate it. And they sent you back to the same office again and again. They let me hang around for a while. Actually, until I chose, it was time to move on. And that's when I moved into the mayor's job. OK, we're coming right up to the end. And I want to ask one more. Of the cases that you did argue successfully in that office, can you give us a thumbnail description of the very best one, the accomplishment that you're the most proud of from that passion? Well, in terms of a single case, the one that was most interesting to me was the one involving a guy by the name of Kirk Langford. And Langford killed a Japanese national. And it was entirely a circumstantial evidence case because Langford had successfully disposed of the body. And he had an elaborate description of why things had happened and that he had not killed this person and why he felt it was necessary for him to dispose of the body. And fortunately, it was a very, very long and involved case and required a lot of circumstantial evidence. And the jury was able to bring back a verdict rather quickly in that case. And now this very sociopathic person who probably was involved in at least one other killing, although we can't prove it. So it's not a certainty. And who also was responsible for a number of sexual assaults on girls who were dancers. He is now in a position where he won't be seeing daylight while he's on this side of the grave. Where is he now? I'm not sure where. I think he's located in one of the mainland facilities. And he's there and will stay there. So we thank you for putting him in a place where he can't hurt anybody. Yeah, that's it. And he was abusive to his wife. And he had a child that he was abusive to. So all of those things are. And yet he was a devout because his father was very religious. He was a devout, devout in tending and attending church. So it was real. Sounds like he was a good actor himself. I think that's a really good way of putting it. I hadn't thought of that, but thank you, Michael. Thank you so much, Peter. It's good to be here. I'm sorry I didn't bring my tie. I feel practically naked without it. So we send our greetings back to young Peter Carlisle. Thank you, my friend. Have a great day.


Hello everyone, I'm Vincent Hong. In this video, I'm going to talk about paper, and key modifications for English-ang-friendly rings. This is a drone work with Qingming-Ramington, Mattis-Kang-Visha, Yagya-Sider, Chen-Zhi-Shi, and Bo-Ying-Yang. Let's first recall some useful properties of number theory transforms. Suppose the integer n is a variable in the ring R. Given the invertible element data and the principal and rules of unity omega, the size n energy key is an isomorphism from the ring of x over x z n minus zeta z n to the product ring, where each ring is of x over x minus zeta times omega z i. If zeta z n is 1, then we call it secret energy. If zeta z n is negative 1, then we call it negative secret energy. Additionally, if zeta z n is the nth power over power omega, then we can use this definition of energy for explaining each step of unity of a key. This will be shown in the next slide. As a ring isomorphism, energy provides alternative approaches for multiplying and adding up to 0.4. For multiplying A and B, we can first apply energy on A and B, point multiply them, and apply the inverse of energy. This multiplicative property is also called the convolution theorem. Since energy can be computed efficiently, we can also compute the product efficiently. For adding up to 0.4, we can also compute energy in a similar fashion, but it is not very clear how we can read the benefit from energy keys. This property is actually crucial for the energy per se, and we'll see in the next few slides. Fast Fourier transforms our several algorithms for computing energy efficiently. In our paper, we implement three effective keys. The first one is clue to the effective key. After applying the secretive entity, for the second isomorphism, we'll apply the observation in the previous slide by setting data to omega to the i. For the second effective key, we implement Jensen's effective key. Jensen's effective key is testing the polynomial rings to the secret ones whenever possible. So, for the second isomorphism, we transform the polynomial ring of x over xnn1 minus omega to the n1i to the polynomial ring of x over xnn1 minus 1. We then continue with secretive keys. The third effective key is question. Question is transforming a one-dimensional convolution into a multidimensional convolution. After the transformation, we can then apply clue to the effective key for each of the dimensions for computing psychic convolutions. In our paper, we implement two-dimensional transformation and then we'll apply clue to the effective key in the dimension of y and compute psychic convolution for the dimension of z. The most important operations for implementing any keys are monogonal locations. On quotation four, we implement 32-bit monogonal notation by utilizing the long-monogonal instructions. For every x2, we implement system-built monogonal notation by utilizing monogonal instructions returning high product. The main reason for this is because there are no 32-bit monogonal instruction returning high product in every x2. Saber is a lattice-based key based on modular learning with round-grip. The polynomial ring chosen by Saber is z ak192 of x over x256 plus 1. The security of Saber is specified by the modular dimension L. And the most time-consuming operation is the measure-to-vector multiplication. The measures A is an L by L matrix where each of the components is a polynomial in RQ. For polynomials in the vectors, all of its coefficients are within plus minus mu over two. We take a closer look at how indy-friendly and how indy-unfriendly Saber is. First, the polynomial modulus is a negative combination. This implies that if we can define negative signal indy-t's, then we don't need to expand the polynomial degree. Next, we look at the coefficient ring, z ak192. In this ring, we can define indy-t's given isomorphisms. Therefore, the coefficient ring is regarded as indy-unfriendly. A straightforward solution for this is to choose a large modulus or several moduli bounding the maximum value of one polynomial location. But indy-t's actually tell us much more than multiplying two polynomials. In particular, for a well-defined indy-t, the summation of several products of polynomials can be computed with the aid of indy-t's first forms. First, we apply indy-t's to all the polynomials. Then, then, we accumulate several point locations, and finally, we apply the inverse of indy-t. This characterization suggests that the structure of measure-to-vector modification is actually threading, because we only need to transfer the vector once, and at the end we only need to compute the inverse of indy-t's for a vector. For the indy-t's for the measure-to-vector modification, we start by computing the result as z is a coefficient ring. Therefore, the maximum value is bounded by 20 times mu times L. On quotas M4, we choose a 32-bit prime Q prime bound in the maximum value. Then, we compute any keys in ZQ prime. For every x2, we choose two certain B-primes, P0 and P1, where the product is bound in the maximum value. Then, we compute any keys P0 and P1. After computing the entire product in these two primes, we then apply CRK to derive the result as if z is a coefficient ring. For computing the entire product with any keys in a certain prime ring, we need L plus L to the 2 any keys for transforming the vector and the metrics into two prime locations and L inverse of any keys. We made the following decisions for our Q4 implementation. First, we compute incomplete any keys, giving 4 coefficient point omials. This is because there are only 14 general propositions on Q4, and we find that computing 3 layers of any keys at a time is the most economical choice. Therefore, in total we compute 6 layers of any keys given 4 coefficient point omials. The second decision is to decide how to accumulate the products of 4 coefficient point omials. For example, suppose we are going to compute h as a summation of products p and q, and we focus on the constant term of the result. Then, we see that there are at least two approaches for computing the constant term. The first approach is to compute the 64-bit value of each cement and reducing them to 32-bit immediately. And finally, the 32-bit result. The second approach is to compute the 64-bit value of the constant term, so we only need to reduce to 32-bit value once. On Q4, due to the register pressure, it's not very clear which approach is faster. And our experiment shows that the second approach is slightly faster than the first approach. Furthermore, we expect that the second approach is going to be a lot faster than the first approach if we have a lot more registers. Now, we take a look at multiplying point omials in Yan Chu. Now, in total, six per liter sets. In our paper, we implement four of the per liter sets. The largest two per liter sets are introduced after we submit our paper. The point omial ring for point omial notation in Yan Chu is ZQ of X over X to the N minus 1, where Q is a power of 2 and N is a prime. We are targeting the point omial location where one of the modulcans is ternary. Therefore, all of its coefficients must be within plus minus 1. In this figure, I only focus on the differences of the blister invitation in Yan Chu and in Yan Chu prime. In Yan Chu prime, we are given two primes for specifying the point omial rings as the large value of field. And I'll compare the per liter set, using one in Yan Chu prime with the per liter set 677 and 701 in Yan Chu. In both implementation of Q stream, they are almost the same except for the reduction to the target point omial rings. And in both implementations, the reduction of point omial modulus is performed before the reduction of the coefficient ring. First of all, we can look at the point omial modulus in Yan Chu and find that for reducing to a coefficient, we need one addition. This also implies that the maximum value if we regard z as a coefficient ring is n times Q. On the other hand, the point omial modulus in Yan Chu prime is x to the p minus x minus 1. So to reduce me to a single entry, we need two additions. This also implies that the maximum value of the result in z is n times 2p minus 1. So already because of the point omial modulus, we find that we need one addition on average and we also need to choose a larger prime for compute s and z. Next, we look at the reductions of coefficient rings. For n Chu, the coefficient ring is a power of 2. Therefore, we can pack two half words before the reduction and after packing into a register, we can then reduce two coefficients at a time with an instruction logical n. So on average, for each coefficient, we only need 0.5 cycles for the reduction. But if we look at the coefficient ring in Chu prime, then the coefficient ring, because of the coefficient ring is a prime ring, we need 32-bit arithmetic for reducing reduction and reduce the coefficient ring with a two-cycle implementation for better reduction. After the reduction, we then pack two half words into a word. Therefore, on average, we need two cycles for reducing each entry. On average, we can save 2.5 cycles for reducing each coefficient. This gives us about 17-50 cycles of reduction on a cycle count. By effect, we have a slightly greater reduction and this is because that Poinomials in n Chu are short-term n Chu prime. I'll talk a little bit about some implementation considerations with AVX2. For AVX2 implementation, since we're implementing two 16-bit entities, we have to compute CRT for applying the result as in Z. For the CRT, we implement the divided difference form for the computation and we find that this approach is more favorable when there are only two products for the CRT. Another important consideration is the magnitude of the intermediate results. We compute the worst-case intervals for the given input intervals. For the computation of the intervals, we follow precisely the arithmetic instructions and grab precisely the real stability for computation. We look at the results of our implementations. The most time-consuming operation in SABER is the measure vector multiplication. On QDSM4, we obtain a reduction of 61% of cytotons and we obtain a reduction of 32% on Skylake. Another important polynomial arithmetic in SABER is the inner product. On QDSM4, we reduce the cytotons by 42%. And on Skylake, we reduce the cytotons by 55%. On QDSM4, the reduction of the ratio of inner product is less than the ratio of measure vector multiplication. This is suspected because the structure of measure vector multiplication is more friendly for any case than the structure of inner product. But I think a little bit weird is that on Skylake, we obtain a greater ratio of reduction on Skylake for the inner product. And the main reason is that for the inner product on Skylake, we compute it in a way by assuming one of the vectors is already transformed by NGVs. So the cytotons is excluding three NGV transformations. On QDSM4, we are doing so, maybe because we are trying to make the implementation compatible with the reference implementation. This is a result of the force of inner saber. On QDSM4, we obtain a reduction from 22% to 26%. On Skylake, we obtain a reduction from 5% to 10%. We also have the result of this result of the CCH transform. We also have the result for the CPA in our paper. This is a result for multiplying a polynomial with a ternary polynomial in entry. On QDSM4, we obtain a reduction for all of the perimeter sets, even for the smallest perimeter sets. And this set a new criterion for applying entities on QDSM4. On Skylake, we are not able to have a speed down for the smallest perimeter set, but we still require a reduction between 7% to 15% for all other perimeter sets. This implies that when the security level becomes larger and larger, we believe that on both QDSM4 and Skylake with FX-2, NGV is more favorable for entry. This is the result of the forcing of entry. We ignore the cyclical of CCH generation because the CCH generation is dominated by the inversion of polynomial and we are not targeting the inversion here. For the encapsulation and decapsulation of the perimeter sets 677 and 701, on QDSM4 we obtain a reduction between 3% to 6% and on Skylake we obtain a reduction between 1% to 2%. We also implement entities for the round 2 summation log. The polynomial range chosen by log is ZQ over X over X over N plus 1 where Q is 251 and N is a power of 2 which are 512 and 1024. In the log summation polynomial notation are also of the form where one of the monvocane is ternary. During the implantation for any keys we find that in the previous implantation the approach is somewhat a quadratic time in N and we believe this is the main reason why we are able to obtain a vast speed of multiplying two-point dominoes. Due to the vast speed of multiplying two-point dominoes we obtain a reduction of cyclical comfort of source in our log between 67% to 79% on QDSM4 and between 20% to 61% on Skylake. In conclusion we find that even though the coefficient range of Sabre, N2 and log are N2 friendly we can still benefit from N2 keys. In particular for Sabre the polynomial modulus is N2 friendly and the structure of metric vector multiplication is also N2 friendly. For N2 since the degrees of polynomials is large we can still benefit from N2 keys. And for log both the polynomial modulus and the degrees of the polynomials such as the N2 keys are very useful. For computing result as in Z on QDSM4 we choose a 32-bit prime bounding the maximum result and for ABX2 we choose two 16-bit primes bounding the maximum result. There are some works worth noting in this period. In our paper we optimize Sabre on QDSM4 only for the purpose of speed and we think mature from blind term for integrating stack optimization of Sabre. For even more stack-automized Sabre on QDSM4 and more about N2 keys there is a paper with more N2 keys for Sabre on QDSM3 for N2 keys with 64-bit on VAA there is a paper Neo-N2 faster dilation kyber and Sabre on QDSM2 and 8.1 In the paper we also introduce three instruction single width multi-modulation and explain how to multiply polynomials in x2 to the 204 minus zeta without requiring the existence of a square root or a fourth root of zeta. Thank you for your attention.


What's up everyone it's your girl Kenzie here from Layton Sports Cards and I'm ripping a personal for Rusty C. We've got a 2022 Bowman Draft Baseball Super Jumbo. All right good luck Rusty. Thanks for hopping in. You're the little bit of Rusty's. Let's do that one cry at least for that young. You too could look like me. Hey. Paper base ship out of this Rusty. That's what it is. With some Rusty's and a whole lot of luck. First refractor Cox, Rojas, Jacob Marcy, Kate Horton, paper. What's up Brennan how's it going man? How's it going? Who who you got? Who you got Super Bowl? I'm saying Bengals and Eagles. Bengals, Eagles, Super Bowl. Got a green here. Green Kyle Menzardo Rays that is 32 of 99. Fractor first Melton. Wood Henry Davis. Got a Keegan first and a Landon Sims on the first refractor auto. 359 of 499. Niners, Bengals. I think Purdy can do it. Card cropping today. Love it. Love it. Love it. Can you show the fight yet? I want to see it. All right Kenzie Boley. Order me some Boley to the uh to the shop boy. I got you. Oh I want those one here. Maybe I have to go to probably. Kumar Rocker and Victor. I don't even know where it is. Gutierrez, Salas. Right next to Chick-fil-A. Landon Sims first. Tris Gonzalez. And Iris 31. Where's that nice another cracked egg just opened. Like kind of by a alehouse. Yeah. Sky blue to 499. Yanquell Fernandez. Sound that road more towards like the LA fitness area. Okay. And that really good fish place right there. Yeah. I love that place. It's across the street from that. Oh okay. First refractor Kenya Huggins. Baccaro. Alex Freeland first refractor. I actually have to go to Ovido on Tuesday or Wednesday. So maybe I'll try it for lunch. Beria first. We've got a Dylan. Let's go. Can you guess? No I don't know. Padres. Yeah it's gonna be a good game Brennan. Both games are gonna be good games today. More, more so the cheats and bangles in my opinion though. That's gonna be the game to watch for sure. Paper. We've got refractor Serta. A reeling first. Benny. Reedy house. Paper. Paper. There's some more green back here. See an auto on that green. Got a Kumar rocker. A nice one there for you Rusty. I know Schultz, Mesa. We've got green auto chase De Lauder. Five of 99. There you go Cleveland. Nice sit there for you Rusty. De Lauder. With a little bit of Rusty's. Oh my gosh. And a whole lot of luck. You two could look like me. It's stuck in my head too. Oh man. I mean it might need to send you some money so you can make a bet for me. How do you do that? You send you have a bookie? Uh huh. Bates out of where? Gainesville, Florida. How does that work? Felon activities. Uh Jackson, Shariah and Victor. Benchow, Hassel, a Owen Murphy first refractor. King Jr. first refractor. Paper. So if I bet 100 bucks on the bangles and they win how much do I win? 150. So I get my 100 back plus 150? Correct. Correct. That's what plus 150 means. Okay. Or $10 to 115. No, I'm not betting 10 to 115. We got a green Aerovera 20 out of 99. She's evil's bucket. Got blue. Anthony Hall first. Nice one there Yankees. It's a cool looking card. 17 of 150. Michael Kennedy first refractor, pre-lip first refractor, Sweeney, Dunhurst. We've got Aqualava first auto of Kenya Huggins 176 of 199. Reds, paper, spores here. Have you seen them? No. I haven't seen spores yet. So I'm going to try and rip these last two personals that are in in queue. As soon as spores comes in though I'm going to have to hop off so you can get ready. All right.  Are you going to say that every time I say his name? I'm going to have that stuck in my head. Barsha Green, refractors, Verdugo, Classe, a Chandler Simpson first, Dela Cruz, paper, paper. The game's at three. I like that. Yeah, it's just starting. We've got Michael Hernandez on the sky blue to 499. Paper. Oh, look at this color match. Nice one here. Yanquell Fernandez, 104 of 250. Brennan's boy there. Nicky York, Menzardo, Elijah Green first refractor. Mendez and Aqualava of Zach Maxwell, 41 of 199. Reds and paper. All righty, Rusty. That will do it for your box. Congrats again. Thanks so much for hopping in and we'll get these right out to you.


Hello everyone, welcome to our Pre-Owned Vehicles of the Week. I'm Gabrielle and I'm over here at Oxmer Toyota. We're going to be featuring two pre-owned Honda vehicles. Guys, why don't we go ahead and start with this one right here. The first vehicle is a 2020 Honda CR-V EX. That exterior color is in Lunar Silver Metallic. We have 18 inch alloy wheels. It's going to be six speakers. There is a sunroof. Teated door mirrors. We are going to have a backup camera. Apple CarPlay with Android Auto. The interior is in a black cloth. Mileage is $38,745. The price is $29,995. And for our last one, this is a 2016 Honda CR-V Touring. The exterior color is in Mountain Air Metallic. We are going to have 18 inch alloy wheels. Roof rails. Power lip skate. There's a power moonroof. Navigation system. Seven speakers. That interior is in a beige leather. Mileage is $66,370. The price is $24,995. All right, you guys, if you have any questions, feel free to let us know. All of our contact info is listed right here. Thanks for watching and I'll see you next time. Bye.


Hello and welcome to NewsClick. Today we are going to discuss what's hit the news. The Yeddi Diaries Caravan is published. Detail extracts from what seems to be the handwritten notings on a diary of Mr. Yedhya Rappa, the former Chief Minister of Karnataka. Parujay, you've been following this issue for a very long time. Partly because Gali Jaland the Reddy, who is the big moneybacks behind all of this in Karnataka, you've covered his various activities, including the illegal export of iron ore from that particular port in... Bellicari port. Bellicari port. Also the links that Gali Jaland the Reddy had with Yadu Rappa and the BJP in Karnataka. It seems that Yeddi Diaries authenticate all these claims. Yes, you know, it confirms our worst suspicions. The period when these payments were allegedly made all pertain to the period when iron ore exports had peaked because demand for iron ore had peaked in China because of the Olympic Games. But I must say the journalists from Caravan, Athira Konikara and Nelina MS have done an amazing amount of work and it's all kudos to Caravan to bring it out. And before one goes into the implications of these diaries, let's summarize briefly for the benefit of our viewers the highlights of what these, the Yeddi Diaries reveal. These have been written by Yadu Rappa's own hand, confirmed, double checked. Signed by him on every page. In Canada, in a diary where there's the state assembly, it was given to state assembly legislators in 2009. And interestingly, all these diaries have been with the income tax department from 2017 onwards. But the big payments. Yes, 1,800 crore, over 1,800 crore, the big amount of money. 1,000 crore rupees to the Central Committee of the Bharatiya Janta Party. This is 2009. That's correct. All these payments have happened in early 2009 to be precise, 18th of January, 2009. Okay, same period of time. Arun Jaitley gets 150 crore. Nitin Gadkari gets 150 crore. Rajanath Singh, 100 crore. And the two senior leaders of the BJP, LK Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, get 50 crore each. It has been further, the entries in the diary allege claim that Mr. Yadu Rappa paid 10 crore rupees for the marriage of Mr. Gadkari's son. And that, in over and above all these payments, a sum of 250 crore rupees was paid to unnamed judges. And 50 crore rupees paid to unnamed advocates. Now this is the big story. And Yadu Rappa was Chief Minister of Karnataka from May 2008 to July 2011. And all these diaries bear his signature. Interestingly, the Income Tax Department had shown this diary to the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in August, 2017. A year and a half ago, nothing seems to have been done about it. The Income Tax Department or an official of the Income Tax Department according to the report of Caravan had suggested there was need for further investigation by the Enforcement Directorate. But nothing has happened. Paul, the other interesting issue, of course, apart from Janadhan Reddy's, shall we say, links to Yadu Rappa and the rise of the Bharati Janta Party, there is also this added issue that how would this diary is recovered by the Income Tax Department? It seems to be from a raid on a Congress Legislature's house. And this Congress Legislature is none other than Mr. D. K. Shivakumar, supposed to be one of the richest politicians of its kind. And how this went from Mr. Yadu Rappa to the Income Tax Department and then via Mr. D. K. Shivakumar is quite an amazing story. So it's a copy of a diary. You know, we don't know who has the original, where it is. I mean, these things haven't been specified, we don't know. And this copy was in a raid of the Income Tax Department on Mr. Shivakumar's house. That raid happened in August 2017. If you will recall, Mr. Shivakumar was at that point of time in the news because he had taken a large number of legislators from Gujarat to a resort in near Bangalore at a time when there was talk that they would be bought over during the Rajasabha elections of the senior Congress leader, Amit Patel. Mr. Amit Patel's election. Thereafter, Mr. Shivakumar's residence was raided. Now, according to this caravan article, what is very, very interesting, is that there was a fight of sorts between the personal assistants of the late Anand Kumar, who was a member of parliament from Bangalore, KS Ishwarappa, a BJP leader, and Mr. Shivakumar to get hold of the diary. And apparently Mr. Anand Kumar had got hold of the diary, but because his relationship with Yadyurappa was good, nothing came out of it. But the story is actually very, very complex. Yadyurappa himself had complained to the central board of direct taxes against Shivakumar. And the Income Tax Department was part of the central board of direct taxes, which was headed at that time by Mr. Sushil Chandra, who had got in fact an extension. And Mr. Sushil Chandra currently is an election commissioner. So one possible construction, I'm not saying this is the truth, could be that the raid was also prompted by the fact that Shivakumar was sitting on this diary and it's an explosive diary. And that could be the reason for this immediate raid as well. All pure political vindetta. That here is a person who's the richest of a legislator with Hayat belonging to the Congress. And because he's so rich and he's so influential, and Karnataka is notorious for their MLA's changing sides literally at the exchange of a couple of briefcases. So this was not surprising. And what was very interesting is, but these amounts are not contained in briefcases. They're rather large. 150 crores and so on. But if you want to compare with today's situation with the 2,000 rupee notes, maybe you won't require too many large briefcases. But very interesting. Mr. Yadurappa's so-called diary meticulously notes where the money came from and where the money went. Almost like an accountant keep a diary, almost reminiscent of the Jain Hawala diaries and the Birla papers and the Sahara papers. Interestingly, among the people involved in these payments were three legislators who were found watching pornographic videos inside the legislator. They were picked up by the cameras. And very, very interestingly, the man behind it is Gali Janadhan Reddy. Behind the payments, all this, and Mr. Yadurappa acknowledges that he became Chief Minister thanks to Gali Janadhan Reddy. Because thanks to the money he got, he was able to win over legislators from the Congress and the Janta Dal secular to become the Chief Minister. Now, he acknowledges that it was Gali Janadhan Reddy who was responsible for him becoming Chief Minister in these diaries. And Gali Janadhan Reddy was the kingpin behind the iron ore scam. You know, in the documentary film I made, it's called Blood and Iron.  Gali Janadhan Reddy spent three years behind bars. And after he came out, he splurged on his daughter's wedding. And this was just after demonetization had been announced in November, 2016. I mean, Bangalore has never seen so much being spent on a wedding. After that, of course, Mr. Gali Janadhan Reddy had to spend another day behind bars for a small period of time. But the interesting part of the story is that when in 2011, the Lokayukta, the people's ombudsman of Karnataka and Santosh Reddy had come out with this voluminous report inditing Yedyurappa and Gali Janadhan Reddy and kicking and screaming Yedyurappa put in his papers. He was compelled, he was forced to resign and he actually spent time behind bars in October of 2011. So what happened was after that, Yedyurappa quit. He was dismissed from the party and he revived a party that had been set up by Padmanabha Prasanna Kumar. It was called the Karnataka Janatapaksh. And he remained, he was a rebel. He remained in that party until a little while before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. When Mr. Narendra Modi and Amit Shah persuaded him to return to the BJP and then you know he was the BJP's Chief Ministerial Candidate. He became a Chief Minister for a short period of time. He didn't have the majority and he's currently the leader of the opposition in Karnataka. It's an interesting issue that we have heard a lot about the Chalkidar campaign recently, but none of the Chalkidars seem to have woken up to the fact that this diary was there. Various, very senior Chalkidars' names were there and no action was being taken. Did Yedyurappa also declare himself to be a Chalkidar in this campaign of Chalkidari? I'm not so sure about it. All I can tell you is that there are all kinds of unusual details in this diary, including his alleged marriage to the BJP member of parliament, Shobha Karanlajeh, which apparently went in a secret ceremony and when he was approached, when Shobha Karanlajeh was asked this question, he said some mad people must have written this diary and then she hung up. Now, what is very interesting is that the people concerned, I already mentioned Mr. Sushil Chandra, who was heading the Central Board of Direct Taxes under which the Income Tax Department when Shivakumar's residence was raided. And it's very, very interesting that Mr. Chandra is only the second officer from the revenue service to be appointed to the election commission. But what is also very, very interesting are these little bits and pieces of information that are coming out about how the money went, who it went to. It's meticulously detailed. It's meticulously- Inflows as well as outflows, both. And I think even if these diaries meet the fate of the Jain Hawala Diary or the Birla papers and the Sahara papers, for the time being, it's severely dented. The image that the BJP is trying to project in the run-up to the elections, that they are the guardian, they are the Chokhidars in response to Rahul Gandhi accusing Mr. Modi Chokhidar Chaur Hai in the Raphael scandal. And it's all kind of, I mean, all these words are coming back, I said, in a sense, to haunt the prime minister. The same person who in the run-up to the elections would boast, Nakhaunga, Nakhanedunga, then neither will I accept any bribes, nor will I tolerate others accepting bribes. All of this is coming back today to haunt the BJP. You know, Bofors scams only 65 crores. What we have is a diary which talks about 150 crores to the finance minister, 150 crores to one of the very other senior ministers in this list, Mr. Gadkari. And the amounts are put together, 1000 crores for the BJP Central Committee. About 1800 crores. 1800 crores. And that was 10 years ago, remember. These payments were made 10 years ago. So even if we take inflation, this is many times the size of, shall we say, Bofors, which was, of course, in the 80s. But coming back, you do think that this is going to at least create a temporary embarrassment if nothing else for the BJP? The gentlemen concerned who have been named, I think they have very thick skins. I don't know what they're going to do. I'm sure Caravan won't be, I wouldn't be surprised if there's some court cases instituted against them. I think they've done their bit. What they said is that they send letters to Mr. Yadu Rappa, Mr. Arun Jaitley, Mr. Nitin Gadkari, Mr. Rajnath Singh, Mr. L. K. Adwani, Mr. Munnumar Joshi, seeking their responses. And at the time, the report was published, which is 22nd of March. These, none of the replies had come in and they're saying their reports will be updated if they respond. So they've tried to protect themselves. So it remains to be seen how the BJP reacts. Well, they just pretend it hasn't been published, ignore it altogether, and hope that the Godi media will shout and scream about something else and people will forget it. I think somewhere along the line, this could also be a bit of wishful thinking. I think we'll have to wait and watch. But probably you and I never really had doubts about all these claims that were being made about how the BJP has not been complicit in big ticket corruption. I mean, we know that in this respect, the BJP has been no different from the Congress party when they accused him. And in fact, in this I&O export scam, it was happening not just in Karnataka, but in Undivided Andhra Pradesh, which was at that point of time headed by a Congress chief minister, Y.S. Rajshekar Reddy, and his son, Jagan Reddy, is now the leader of the opposition in the divided Andhra Pradesh. I mean, they all know exactly what was going on. Jagan Reddy, too, had to spend time behind bars. I think he was behind bars for about a year, unlike Gali Janathan Reddy, who was behind bars for about three years or thereabouts. It's across the border, and iron ore mines were on both sides. And it is also true that there seems to have a business understanding between both the Reddy brothers and Rajshekar Reddy and Jagan Reddy. As the late Gauri Lankesh had pointed out to me in the interview I did with them, they would play along with the state borders, you know? The markers, those markstones, they would just move from here to there, anyway. And as the CPM leader of Andhra Pradesh had pointed out, they didn't even, you know, the so-called Hindutva Party didn't even care about a temple. When they had to sort of figure out there was a lot of iron ore behind that ancient temple, they didn't think twice about finishing it off and Mr. B. Raghavalu of the CPM pointed out that the illegal miners had no combs in demolishing an ancient temple because underneath that temple there was reserves of iron ore. Greed has no religion, and as you have showed in your film, even the waters of that place had turned red. That was the extent of how much, apart from anything else, how much even destruction it created ecologically in that place. So, hard times for Mr. Riyadh again, it looks like, and maybe hard times for some of the leaders of the BJP. Thank you very much, Paranjit, you were with us explaining to us the roots of this, not just the diary alone. Thank you for being with us. Do keep watching. News click.


The power of the Holy Spirit can change your circumstances, but the presence of the Holy Spirit changes you. Beware that you don't operate in His power without living in His presence. Beware that you don't live a life of all gifts but no glory. Yes, when the Holy Spirit comes upon you, you will receive power. Power is most certainly a result of His influence. But the greatest sign that the Holy Spirit dwells in you isn't power, it's the nature and character of Christ in you. The fruit of the Spirit, not the power of the Holy Spirit, is the ultimate mark on the believer.


Box 13. With the star of Pheromont Pictures, Alan Ladd has Dan Holliday. Box 13. Box 13. Box 13. Box 13. Box 13. Holliday, why did you ever leave a soft job as a reporter to become a freelance writer? Or why did you ever advertise for adventure? Oh, I know it makes you feel like a kid with a box of crackerjack. Now you can't stop. You might run across a juicy peanut, or that grand prize is supposed to come in each and every package. But you know by now that storylines like money don't grow on trees. Susie, where have you been? You know where I've been, Mr. Holiday. Down to star times after the mail. Oh, yes, the mail. What's in box 13? Box 13, starring Ellen Ladd as Dan Holiday. And now, box 13, starring Ellen Ladd as Dan Holiday. Box 13. I wish I'd never rented the thing. Wish I'd never even thought of it. Mr. Holiday, you're early this morning. Well, I had to see if my new secretary's on the ball.  Oh, oh, now take it easy, Susie. You'll need those elbows to lean on when things get dull around here. Dull? Oh, things don't get dull around you, Mr. Holiday. Hey, what's that you're writing, a love letter? Yeah, it's a love letter to your publisher. He wants to know where are the chapters you promised for the new book? And what are you telling him, Susie?  Thanks. By the way, where are those chapters, Mr. Holiday? If I had them, my secretary'd have lots of extra work. You don't like extra work, do you, Susie? I don't like your worried look. When you don't have chapters, you have that look. Oh, does it show so much? Like a chinchilla coat in a dime store. It's the hallmark of my profession, Susie. Say, what was in box 13 today?  Oh, brother. Oh, yes. There was a ticket to a radio broadcast. Radio broadcast? Silky Soap presents Time for Drama, starring Jean Blake, 8 p.m. Federal Broadcasting Studios. Now, who would want me to go to a radio show? The advertising agency, maybe? Those guys don't read adventure wanted ads. Too busy dreaming up singing commercials. Someone wants you should go to that broadcast awful bad. Yeah. She wrote, please, in the back of the envelope. She? Yeah, she. And I don't like her taste in lipstick. The one she wrote this with is the color of blood. And now you have returned, my darling. I am alive again. The wind is down, but still the seas run high. Time for drama has presented The Wind is Down, starring Jean Blake. In the cast were Robert Baylor as John, Agnes Sloan as Grandmother, and Marvin Masterson as the Butler. This is FBC, the federal broadcasting government. Sorry, sir. We're closing the studio. Huh? Oh, sure. Sure. I was meeting someone.  Someone in the cast, sir? Yes, it could be. I think they've all gone, but you might try the stage entrance. Oh, thanks. How do I get there? Around the back of the building, sir. Just opposite the parking lot.  Watch where you're going. Sorry I didn't see you coming around the corner. You autograph hounds always clutter up the entrance. For that, I'll not give you mine. Step aside there. Oh, don't mind him, son. He's just an old ham. There has been. Oh, that's a heavy hunk of ham. Who is he, Pop? His name is Marvin Masterson. Not the Marvin Masterson. Yep. He's washed up in pictures. Through on the stage, too. There's bits on the air now. Say, didn't I see him play a butler on time for drama tonight? Yep. How the mighty have fallen. Say, Pop, you read that like an actor. Was one once. Oh, nothing like Masterson, of course. And I can appreciate how he must feel. Well, someone else did, too, when he said, fame it is the flower of a day that dies when the next sun rises. You an actor, too, son? No writer. Name wouldn't be Dan Holiday, would it? Yes, fine. Got a message for you? From whom? Don't know. Found this note on my desk. If Mr. Dan Holiday comes around, ask him to go to the Mayfair restaurant. Hey, what is this? I'm getting passed around like a collection plate. And when you catch up to her, give her a pencil. That lipstick smeared up my call sheet. Oh, Monsieur Dan Holiday, it is an honor to have you once more at Mayfair. You have deserted us too long. Working hard, Henri? Always. But tonight, you relax. You have fun, eh, Monsieur Dan Holiday? What do you mean? A charming young lady waiting for you at your table. Oh, I'd hoped you'd come, Mr. Holiday. Why, you're Jean Blake. Yes, I must talk with you. We'll order later, Henri. Now what is this all about? Oh, I suppose I am being rather mysterious. I'm used to mystery. Besides not owning a pencil, what's your problem? Pencil? Yes, that lipstick you write notes with comes off on things. Oh. I'm in danger, Mr. Holiday. You're grave danger. But why come to me? I know about you in box 13. You advertise adventure wanted will go any place, do anything. I need help, so. So? Mr. Holiday, I'm going to be killed. I'll do anything you ask, but you must help me. You must. Oh, now, look, Miss Blake. I'm a writer, not a detective. I don't, Monsieur Holiday. Yes, Henri? There's a call for you. May I plug you in the phone? A call? Oh, sure, excuse me, please. Hello? You must be psychic. Who's this? Insighted. I suppose I am.  Oh, yeah, a little. That makes you so sure. Anyone else? That I don't see. Something. You're in this restaurant? Now, Miss Blake. You will help me. But, Miss Blake, I. But you must. You simply must. Look, I'll pay you anything. I don't want your money, Miss Blake. I want you to see the police. You won't help me? No. That's final? That's final. Very well. Goodbye, Mr. Holiday. Well, nice going, Holiday. A young woman in distress pleads for help. And what do you do? Send her out into the night alone. But you had to do it, so that that mad man on the phone wouldn't hurt somebody. Now, you've got to find her and fast. Henri? Henri? Oui, Monsieur, Alainé? That girl who just left, Jean Blake. Did you see where she went? Oui, Monsieur. She walked towards the park. Well, this is the park, but no Jean Blake. Oh, there she is. Miss Blake! Miss Blake, wait! It's all right, Miss Blake. Stand Holiday. Oh, but I thought... No time for thinking. Get in my car quickly. What can I do? Oh, now easy, Miss Blake. Take it easy. Come on, try to be calm. Can you tell me who's been threatening me? There's only one thing we can do. Go to the police. You can relax now, Holiday. You're off that hook. The Blake gal's probably back home and you can bet they put a cop to stand guard at the door. Sure, Holiday, this would have made a great springboard for a yarn, but you're out of it now. So I'll just forget the whole thing. Anyway, what would you have done for the last chapter? Last chapter. Of course, sir, if you should go back to the Mayfair for lunch tomorrow, you just might run across something interesting. Monsieur Dan Holiday? Yes? The author? Oh, I thought this much. Bring your pictures on dust jackets of your very exciting books. I'm a fan of yours. Have a seat, Mr. Masterson. Nice meal. Have we bumped into one another before? Well, I'd call it a near miss, but along with a few million others, I'd recognize you anyway. Personally, I detest dining alone.  My pleasure, sir. Thank you. Hungry? Serve my dinner here. Your voice is very distinctive, Mr. Masterson. Seems I've heard it just recently. Of course. It was on the radio. I've been doing a bit of that, you know. Simply for amusement, of course. Oh, yes. I saw you on Jean Blake's show last evening. You played the butthole. Ah, yes. I asked them not to credit me. He's just dabbling with radio. A new medium, you see. I'm sure the name Masterson means a great deal, even to the radio audience. The public, soon for death. They call, Mr. Holiday again. The phone is connected. Oh, thank you. Hello? Holiday. What's wrong? Jean Blake. She's just been murdered. You are listening to Box 13 starring Alan Ladd as Dan Holiday. Back to Box 13 starring Alan Ladd as Dan Holiday. Well, what a sleuth you turned out to be, Holiday.  And the gal you're trying to protect gets knocked off. Hold it, Mac. Where do you think you're going? Miss Blake's. Miss Blake ain't seeing nobody. Yeah, that's for sure. She's dead. Dead? Are you crazy, mister? I've been here all the time. Which part of the duplex is hers? Upstairs. But you can't... Come on. This it? Yes. But I... Come on, bust it in. See what I mean? Suicide, huh? What did she take? Suicide. You better look again. She was shot. That's impossible. I'd have heard something. I've been here six hours and I ain't heard no shot. But there were three shots. I heard them just 15 minutes ago. You heard them. You wasn't here 15 minutes ago. Or was you? Were you? I told you I've been here six hours. Didn't you leave for cigarettes or something? I told you I'd been here... Yeah, I know you've been here six hours. But who was around before I got here? No one. That is nobody but them. Nobody but who? The tenants of the other apartment. An old guy and his daughter, name of Masterson. Masterson? Look, Mac, you know too much about this. I'm holding you till I get the inspector down here. Sure. When you're falling in, tell headquarters to send along a magician's manual. Huh? You didn't hear any shots. This thing must have been done with mirrors. Did you talk to Miss Blake after you left her last night? No, not till she phoned me this noon, Inspector. At the restaurant. She phoned you at the restaurant this noon? Yeah, that's right. I was having lunch with a guy from downstairs. Marvin Masterson. Well, I got news for you, Holiday. If you talked to anybody, it wasn't Miss Blake. What do you mean? She couldn't have telephoned you. She's been dead over 12 hours. How about that? Holiday. Holiday, where's that good ear you're supposed to have? Sure, you would swear it was Miss Blake's voice. But she was dead 12 hours before. Look, Holiday, you're trying to find the last chapter. But even you couldn't write this one. But it was her voice. Come on now. Think, Holiday. What did she say over the phone? Come now. There was something else that came over that wire. Something a good ear would have picked up. Think, Holiday. Think. What else did you hear over that phone? Sounding the Westminster Abbey chimes. Yes? Miss Masterson. I'm Dan Holiday. Oh, yes. Good evening. Won't you come in? I'm sorry to intrude. Oh, not at all. Father told me he lunched with you this noon. Oh, yes. Is your father at home? No. Oh. Is there something I can do? Oh, yes. Answer a few questions, if you will. Well, if it's about that poor girl upstairs, the police have already questioned Father and me extensively. Poor Father. He was so upset he went out to our beach cottage for a few days. I'd like very much to know if... Can't you get your information from headquarters? No. Why? You see, I know more than the police do. Isn't withholding evidence of crime, Mr. Holiday? Yes. So is aiding and abetting a murder. I'm afraid that's not very clear. Some details are not clear to me. That's why I'm here. Are you insinuating that... No. I'm accusing. Accusing whom of what? A father and his daughter. Of murder and murder. A father and his daughter. Of murder and abetting a murder, respectively.  I don't think so. I get it. This is just a gag cooked up between you and my father. Well, it really isn't very funny. It's no gag. Your father murdered Jean Blake. And I believe you helped him, Miss Mastison. And now I'm sure of it. Is my silence that expressive? No, but your clock strikes the Westminster chimes. Chimes? I don't see what they've got to do with it. I see several things.  It does have an attachment for making recordings, doesn't it? Mr. Holiday, you have no right to ask questions. The police got all the information they wanted. But not the evidence to convict Marvin Mastison. I know he's a murderer. You all have to prove that. I heard Jean Blake calling for help. Then I heard that shots had killed her. Well, if my father was dining with you at the time, how could he be the killer? I heard the murder. But not at the time it was committed. It was you, Miss Mastison, who telephoned me at the restaurant. Are you trying to say I'm clever enough to go through that shooting routine and then fake Jean Blake's voice over the phone? It was Miss Blake's voice all right. However, I heard it 12 hours after your father killed her in this apartment. Later, he carried her body upstairs. That's fantastic. Is it? Mind if I go through this collection of records? I should find the one Jean Blake was forced to cut on his machine before she was shot to death. No, don't. Please, I... Oh, you did play that record I heard on the phone. Yes. But I thought it was a joke father was playing on someone. He phoned me a few minutes before and told me what to do. What did you think when you discovered Miss Blake was dead? I was frantic. You see, father warned me to forget all about the record. He refused to answer any of my questions. Mr. Holliday, my father can't be responsible for this tragedy. He's just a broken old man. He was the idol of millions for so long and now they don't want him anymore. He's breaking his heart. Please. Please, I'm begging you to forget all about this, Mr. Holliday. I thought you might be innocently involved. But I'm afraid you can't protect your father from emergency change. What will they do with him? I'm sorry, Miss Masterson, but I'll have to take that record. Don't touch that cabinet Holliday. Oh, you didn't like the beach, Masterson. I didn't go. You're too clever to be out of my sight. Being at this end of your gun might indicate otherwise. But I don't like guns pointing at me. Hey, get out of the way! He was going to shoot you. Oh, you're so right. Fortunately, you got in the way.  Yes, I'm afraid I am. How did you know it was done here, not up in Jean's apartment? Jean didn't have a clock, which strikes the Westminster Abbey Chimes. This is Box 13, starring Alan Ladd as Dan Holliday. What is station high? It is a proud benefit. It boasts and begs. It begs arms of homage from the throng. And off the throng denies its charity. Holliday. What's that, Inspector?  Imagine his insane jealousy of a young performer leading him into a murder plot. Oh, I know, but after all, look at it from Masterson's viewpoint. He'd been a great star, now he was reduced to playing a bit. Support of a girl he considered an upstart. Well, it's too bad. Yes, he's thinking with a rye on him. He figured if he got rid of her, they might rebuild the show around him. The old boy was nutty as a pack of peanut brittle. Well, Mr. Holliday, should I go over to Star Time and see what's in box 13? Oh, not this morning, Susie. Today we work. Chapters for our publisher? Chapters for our dear publisher. Good. Oh, say, before we start, there's a letter here for you. A letter? What's it say? It's from a man who owns the apartment building where you live. Yes. It says, your rent is past due. Get it up or get out. Oh, fine. Next week, same time, Alan Ladd stars as Dan Holliday in box 13. Alan Ladd appears through the courtesy of Paramount Pictures and may currently be seen in Wild Harvest. Box 13 is directed by Ted Hediger with an original story by Frank Hartossi. The part of Susie is played by Sylvia Picker. Original music was composed and conducted by Rudy Schrager. This is a Mayfair production.


Ah, nature, wildlife's returning, air pollution's clearing up. Maybe humanity was the real virus all along. Maybe COVID-19 is the vaccine. Okay, so that extinction rebellion tweet might have been the result of a white supremacist imposter account. But there have been enough people showing their asses on the internet during this pandemic and not in a good wholesome-only-fans kind of way that it's worth reminding ourselves just why eco-fascism is bad, actually. So what makes somebody an eco-fascist? It's not just the aggressive evangelising of the benefits of tofu, or even spending your weekends busting animals out of testing facilities. No, eco-fascism is an extreme right-wing ideology, which holds that the solution to ecological catastrophe is population control. This idea has its origins way before climate change was even a glint in a Koch brother's eye. Back in the late 18th century, Thomas Malthus argued that poverty, disease and hunger wasn't caused by things like living in squalor or exploitation by capitalists. No, it was the working class having the temerity to have too many babies. And this flawed basis for understanding what constitutes the health of a society leads on to the justification of genocidal means in order to protect it. It's probably best summed up by the lifeboat ethics of eco-fascist and deep ecologist Pente Linkala. As he puts it, when the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try and load it with more people and sink the lot. Those who love and respect life will take the ship's axe and sever the extra hands to the sides. And that's what's so poisonous about eco-fascist ideology. Rather than our capacity for mutual aid being a defining characteristic of what it means to be human, it's seen as encouraging forms of social parasitism. If you're marginalised for any reason, perhaps you're a refugee or you're disabled or maybe you're merely poor, that's a reason to be excluded from the body politic rather than being helped by it. OK, so being happy that you saw a robin in your garden during lockdown doesn't make you Hitler's cousin. But when you say stuff like humanity's the real virus or maybe COVID-19's the actual vaccine, what you're saying is that the people who are most affected by this virus, the elderly, the disabled, people on low incomes who have to go out there and work, deserve to die. Humanity isn't an overcrowded lifeboat, but if it was, we'd chuck eco-fascism overboard first.


I remind members that, if the amendment in the name of Shona Robison is agreed to, the amendment in the name of Jackie Baillie will fall. The question is that amendment 12010.5 in the name of Shona Robison, which seeks to amend motion 12010 in the name of Douglas Ross, on UK Covid-19 inquiry revelations be agreed and members should cast their vote now. The result of the vote on amendment 12010.5 in the name of Shona Robison is, yes, 61, no, 53. There was one abstention and the amendment is therefore agreed. The next question is that motion 12010 in the name of Douglas Ross, as amended, on UK Covid-19 inquiry revelations be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament has not agreed and therefore we will move to a vote and members should cast their vote now. The vote is now closed. The result of the vote on motion 12010 in the name of Douglas Ross as amended is, yes, 61, no, 53. There was one abstention and the motion as amended is therefore agreed. The final question to be put today involves my proposing to ask a single question on seven parliamentary bureau motions. Does any member object to those questions being asked in these single question? No member objects. The final question is, and I will read them all right again, that motions 12021 on approval of SI, 12022 and 12023 on approval of SSIs, 12024 and 12025 on approval of lead documents, 12026 on designation of lead committee, and 12027 on committee membership in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau be agreed. Are we all agreed? Yes. Are we all agreed? Yes. The motions are therefore agreed and that concludes decision time and we will move on to members business after a short pause.