New Scotland Yard raided a warehouse in the Soho District today in search of a group of thieves running a worldwide fraud operation. Instead they found parts of the warehouse ablaze where the evidence destroyed and the criminals long gone. In other news... My journey to England began with a phone call from a soccer mom in Glendale. Her name was Alice Keyes and her identity had been stolen. They hooked Alice with a type of internet fraud called phishing. She got an email from her bank telling her that there was a problem with her account. It contained a link to the bank's website that would allow her to fix the problem by re-entering her personal data. Trouble was, it only looked like her bank. She figured that out when her credit card bill came in the mail two weeks later with $4,000 in charges she couldn't explain. Her so-called bank was actually a slick looking website created by a guy named Charles Napier. The problem was, he was 5,000 miles away. I got back in. Michelle there. Nice. Hey. Hey Alice. Out in the search cow. Somehow they got tipped off. Looks like they left in a hurry though. Did Scotland Yard have anything on Napier? A lot.  In all kinds of scams. All of them on the internet. Wow. Advanced payment, auction fraud, software piracy, phishing. You name it, he's doing it. The victim's all over the U.S. Several other countries as well. Really? Yeah, we met with the Office of Fair Trading in London. Any luck tracing has stolen the merchandise. No. All the stuff was mailed to some college kids in Florida. They forwarded everything to a mail drop in Edinburgh. He recruited them on the net, paid them wire transfers. They thought the whole thing was legit. What about the number he posted for the bank? That turns out to be a prepaid cell phone. He purchased with another stolen card. Yeah, he only used it for a couple of weeks and then he dumped it. Great. Well, at least the trip wasn't a total waste. Didn't pick you up up present. I bring you greetings from London. Sorry I didn't have time to wrap it. Oh, you shouldn't have.  I don't know. Greg tried the mobile forensics kit at the search. A little too far gone. I was hoping the lab could do something with it.  I can use some sleep. Coffee. I'll see you later. Maybe your head covered his tracks pretty well. But the crime lab was about to make a wake up call. Got it. Alan. Steve. Hey, Steve. Were you able to salvage anything from that laptop? Oh, this guy was pretty careful Alan. He formatted the drive to erase everything. And the fire took out a couple of the platters, but I was able to salvage the rest. Alan. We've got thousands of victims here. There are 40,000 credit card numbers alone. Stolen goods being moved all over the world. That's good stuff, Steve. I'm going to need to get all that to the assistant U.S. attorney. Didn't happen to recover anything that may help us find this guy. I mean, he is into the wind, man. Well, as a matter of fact. A week ago, he booked a vacation in Thailand. Now, according to his itinerary, he's scheduled to take a tour of the Pasak River tomorrow, returning to his hotel in Bangkok on Thursday. Good news. I really appreciate that, Steve. I need you to get me a disk of everything you got right away. You bet. The inspection service and Scotland Yard requested assistance from the Thai police and arranged for them to arrest Napier at his hotel. We went to be an observer and help with the interviews. What's all this? This is Alice Keyes. She's one of the people whose lives you stole. Oh, come on now. Some little bird gets pinched for a few quid. He's treating me like a terrorist. Credit card company landed on the loss anyway. Took her six months to straighten out her bank account and she almost lost her home. Grabbed about that? Yeah, yeah, life's tough all over. We all have to survive best we can. You know, you are absolutely right. You are going to need every one of your survival skills in federal prison. Federal prison? That's where you're wrong, mate. I'm one of the next plane back to Maryland. No, no, not this time, Napier. See, we've already spoken to Scotland Yard and the British prosecutors about your extradition. Looks like you're a man without a country. Paul's Napier's awaiting trial in federal court for over 100 counts of male fraud and his victims are slowly rebuilding their financial lives. The internet can be a safe place to do business but you should be aware that there are those who target unsuspecting consumers. There are steps that you can take to protect yourself. Number one, be suspicious of emails that appear to be from banks, online auction sites or other retailers. Usually they'll ask you to correct mistakes in your account information or provide other personal information. Never use a link in an email to visit any website. Type in the address that you normally use to log into those sites. If you have doubts, call the business on the telephone. You should always be able to resolve the complaint with a customer service representative if the company's legitimate. Number two, only purchase goods and services from sites that you trust. Software makes it easy for criminals to create websites and emails that look exactly like the real ones. Examine all offers carefully before purchasing. Lastly, when you're online, be on guard. For postal inspectors, internet scams are like old wine in a new bottle. The mill, fraud and telemarketing scams we've seen in the past are now coming at you through cyberspace. Whether it's auction fraud or identity theft, reshipping scams or foreign lotteries, be cautious and be smart. For more tips on how to avoid internet fraud or to report the crime if you've been a victim, visit our website at usps.com slash postal inspectors. Or, looks too good to be true.com. These simple steps can help protect you from crooks thousands of miles away or just across the street. And will give them a world of trouble.


It might be that we start a bit late again. For the morning session is Andrea Armour from the University of Nottingham. And the title is Multifotone and Multimode, Josephson Photonics. So please, Andrea, you have the floor. Thank you very much, Chipman. And I'd like to start by thanking you and all of the organizers for inviting me today and for organizing such a fantastic meeting with so many really stimulating talks this week. So I want to talk about some theoretical work on exciting photons and cavity modes using Josephson Junction circuits in cases where multiple photons or multiple modes are involved. And this was work done with students Kiran Wood, Grace Morley, but the main player was Ben Lang, my postdoc who's with you in the room and who spoke on Wednesday. So do grab him at the coffee break if you want to hear more. So I want to start really by taking you back in time to Wednesday morning, when we heard some really nice talks on this system, a voltage biased Josephson Junction coupled either to a microwave cavity supporting multiple modes or just a single lumped element oscillator. And what we heard was that the voltage bias provides an energy which the Cooper pairs can dump into modes of the cavity. And so we can get inelastic tunneling of the Cooper pairs giving rise to DC current, but we can also have excitation of the cavity modes. And there's a very simple model that can be used to describe the system. If we have several modes, we can just have them as harmonic oscillators. And then the Josephson Junction part, we have a Josephson frequency set by the voltage and then essentially the displacement of all of the oscillators with a zero point fluctuation strength here which is basically given by the set by the impedance of the mode, the particular mode. And of course there are also losses that we have to worry about in this system as well. But one way of looking at it is to think of this as a nonlinear oscillator system. And in that sense, the Josephson energy acts as a control parameter. It controls the strength of this drive which because of the presence of this term is strongly nonlinear. And so we can think about what happens as we change that parameter as well as some of the other parameters in the system. And of course I'm gonna focus on this particular system but there are lots of other systems with Josephson junctions in squid geometries which can be addressed with different types of biases which would give rise to similar behavior. So this strength of the quantum fluctuations of a particular mode is a really crucial parameter in the system. If it's very small, then these systems of course are nonlinear but the nonlinearity will become apparent at large photon numbers. And this suggests that these systems will behave quite semi-classically. That's not to say that they won't have important quantum properties but the classical dynamics will be important. And then we can think about maybe the quantum fluctuations on top of that. If Delta naught is of order one, and this is something which has been achieved in circuits, then that nonlinearity will become apparent at a level of a single photon or less. And so really there won't be a regime where these systems behave nearly. There'll be immediately strongly quantum in their behavior. And I want to focus on the dynamical transitions that these systems can give rise to, down-conversion time-translational symmetry breaking. And I want to focus on two particular cases. Firstly, a single mode case with a very large quantum fluctuation strength, like this device that was developed in the satellite group and Denny talked about on Wednesday, which they've used to carry out a series of very beautiful experiments and in particular looking at multi-photon resonances. And so that's the sort of system I'll have in mind talking about multi-photon resonances. But in other systems, straightforward cavities where there's been no attempt to engineer a very large inductance, this parameter is very small, typically. But these can still be interesting. And in this case, there was some very nice progress from Alex Rimburg's group who developed a way of basically inserting a voltage bias into a cavity with some Cooper pair, some Josephson junction device embedded within it in a way that preserved a really high Q. And so these systems are also interesting, but in this case, we have to worry about not just one, but multiple modes in the physics. And I'll talk about those towards the end, depending on how much time is left. So starting with a single mode model, we can think about tuning the voltage and what's going to happen. And so as we tune the voltage or equivalently the Josephson frequency, we will be able to create photons in that mode whenever that frequency matches an integer number of those photons. And so we expect to have particular resonances. And of course, these were seen in the Sackley group and indeed elsewhere. So close to those resonances, we can simplify the Hamiltonian. We can get away from the time dependence by transforming to a rotating frame. So basically the time dependence then sits on the operators here, they start to oscillate. And so we have an oscillation within an oscillation. And so it's perhaps not surprising that there's a way to write this in terms of Bessel functions. And that's this form here, which should be valid close to a resonance where P photons are created. And so we have creation operator for P photons and annihilation operation for P photons. And then this Bessel function part, which looks a bit complicated, but really that's just telling us that once the cavity mode is excited and there are photons in it, that will act to affect those creation processes. And there's also normal ordering here, which just tells us that we don't really need to worry about the ordering of the operators in here because it's been predefined with the a daggers or on the left. And writing it this way with the Bessel functions is actually very helpful if we want to go into a classical description because we can immediately write this as a classical Hamiltonian with amplitudes instead of operators and Bessel functions here. And of course, all of the classical behavior is very strongly rooted in Bessel functions. We can detune it a little bit if we like. Ordering the operators at the beginning gives us this slightly renormalized josin energy depending on the quantum fluctuations. The other thing to note about this Hamiltonian is that once we're in the rotating frame and we've also dropped terms that aren't resonant, making a rotating wave approximation, we have a Hamiltonian which now has a rotational symmetry and we'll see that is important later on. We can take that Hamiltonian and combine it with descriptive terms to write down a master equation for the system. And that gives us a theoretical description of the quantum dynamics. So why bother with going up in P with this system?  But they don't talk about processes where six photons are created. Those are really quite hard to find. And it's really exciting, as we heard on Wednesday, that you can actually get this to work and generate these packets of six photons up to six photons at a time as the Sackler group did in collaboration with the Olm group and published in this recent paper. So, but what's interesting perhaps beyond the fact that it's just a really exciting thing to be doing. It's a novel thing to be doing. What might we get from theory that would point to interesting features going up in P? So the three photon resonance P equals three in this and similar systems actually been explored quite widely recently by different groups, in particular the Olm group. And we also heard from Lisa on Wednesday about this as well and her analysis of this very nice description of what happens in the three photon case. What I want to talk about is what happens when you go beyond three. And our claim is that qualitatively new features seem to emerge in the quantum dynamics that make this really worth looking at. So let's start with a simpler case, a two photon case. So this is perhaps not very far from the kind of things that are common in quantum optics. And let's look at, so this is the Hamiltonian in this case, the P equals two case. And let's look at the average number of photons in the steady state of the system as the Josephson energy is increased. And the first thing we can do is carry out a classical analysis. We can turn these operators into amplitudes and solve classical equations of motion. And that's what this thin gray line is here. This tells us that we have a threshold and the system will get excited. And then there'll be another bifurcation and we expect the amplitude to settle down. So that's what the classical system does. It gets excited and that excitation is at a very low photon number. Typically it doesn't really need the Bessel function. And so it's this fairly well-known parametric process. We can go beyond that and do something which is semi-classical. We can take the Hamiltonian, the master equation. We can transform it into a phase space. Let's look at the dynamics of the Wigner function but not take all the terms into account. We can, the nonlinear dynamics and the quantum aspects give rise to higher order derivatives when we do that. But if we drop those and we just describe the system using a Fokker Planck equation, it gives us something which essentially has semi-classical dynamics but also zero point fluctuations and noise. And that's what this dashed line does for us here. Finally, we can solve the full master equation and we see that agrees pretty well but not exactly with the semi-classical analysis in this case. And in particular, that initial sharp classical threshold is smeared out but it does settle down eventually. And the way the system saturates in the end depends very much on this, the strength of the quantum fluctuations. So if those are weak, then this end value becomes very large. So when you make the quantum fluctuations large, you shrink the phase space of the system. Everything happens at smaller photon numbers. And that's very important for understanding behavior. So that's the two photon case. What about going beyond that? So we heard from Lisa about the three photon case. Here, when you look at the classical analysis, there's no smooth increase. There's a bifurcation and a fixed point appears at a finite amplitude and then it locks in as well. The origin remains stable but its basin of attraction gets really, really small. And so again, you get fairly good agreement here when you compare the fully quantum and the semi-classical. The other thing to notice is that the photon number has increased. So as you increase P, the phase space grows naturally. So the level at which the system settles down gets bigger at higher P. When we go to P equals four, things are really starting to change. And this suggests that there's something interesting that's happening at larger photon numbers. So now there's considerable disagreement between the semi-classical and the quantum case. And indeed, it's not even monotonic. The photon number goes up and then for a little while, it goes down again before settling again. And again, as we're increasing the photon, the order of the process, the level at which this is happening is going to higher photon numbers. So this is the sixth photon case and I just wanted to show you some of the features of this. So this is showing in color here, this is the number distribution. So this is N along here and the color is the probability in the steady state for finding that number of photons in the system as we change Ej. And again, we've got some classical dynamics as a guide here and then we've got the average occupation. And what you see is that as Ej is increased, the system starts at the origin but then it develops some probability to be away from the origin but then this falses for a while and the system seems to go back towards the origin before it settles down again, apparently at a higher amplitude. And we see as this is an oscillation in the average occupation number. So it first increases around the classical bifurcation. It has a second peak later and then it settles down. We can look at this in the phase space and these diagrams are a little bit busy. They've got classical flow lines and fixed points but the blue color is just the Vigna function showing what the system is doing in phase space as we change Ej. And essentially as we start off down here, the system is around the origin. And then because of the P-fold rotational symmetry in the Hamiltonian, as we go into the bifurcation, the system is spreading out with these six bright points around here but then as we continue, it goes back again. So we have this oscillation. So this bifurcation, this dynamical transition is actually very complicated that we're seeing here. If we go a bit further, in fact, there's a second bifurcation where these six points would actually split into 12 but we can't see that just yet on this diagram. So I think the message I want to convey about this and why I think it's really interesting is that if we look at what happens as we change the quantum fluctuations and we essentially tune the phase space of this system, we don't just increase this effect by making the phase space smaller. So this is a scaled version of the occupation number as a function of Ej on a log scale with different values of the quantum fluctuations. And what we see is that at smaller values, 0.4, there are no oscillations visible, there's nothing happening. As we increase it, we get a series of very sharp oscillations and this is shrinking the phase space but if you keep shrinking it, they start to wash out again. They're not quite as clear at these largest values. So what I think is really interesting about these oscillations is that they don't occur just in a strongly quantum few-photon limit. Of course, they're washed out in a limit with many, many photons but they somehow they exist in some mesoscopic regime in between where the photon number is neither too large nor too small. Of course that makes it very tricky to analyze it as well. So let's go beyond the static features and talk about some of the dynamics going on in the system. So it's described by a master equation and the right hand side of that is captured by a L'Ovillian that acts on the density operator and the timescales of the system, its dynamical timescales are all within that L'Ovillian and if we calculate the eigenvalues then we know all about the timescales of the system. Now, what we expect is as that we go towards something that in the classical cases of bifurcation we may expect to see a slow timescale emerging, a signature of critical slowing down essentially. Now, people in the nonlinear dynamics community think about large photon limit where the number of photons is very large and in that case you can start to have a timescale that doesn't just become very small it tends towards zero in that limit and people think of that as then becoming in some sense a phase transition. So let me start with an example and this is one of the kind of models that David was solving yesterday. This is a two photon process and in this case, as you increase the effective drive the system goes from sitting around the origin to suddenly developing a couple of nodes at the side. So they appear at a finite amplitude making it a first order transition and it breaks the symmetry and eventually as you keep going with the driving they disappear. And if you look at the timescales in the system as you go through this bifurcation you get a couple of timescales becoming very slow and then one of them goes back up and the other stays very slow and that's really a signature of the fact that you essentially have these two lobes and there's a very slow timescale associated with switching between them. So this is a sort of model that people discuss and it's a relatively simple one with a two photon process. What about going up in photon number? What happens in those cases? Well, for p equals three, so n here is the photon number and then we've got the timescales here on a log scale becoming very slow here and we've got a timescale that comes down and goes up again around the point that the system gets excited around the bifurcation and we also have a couple of timescales that go down and they stay down. They wiggle a little bit but essentially this fits this paradigm that people have discussed very widely of dynamical transitions and we would expect that if we could make the phase space bigger then this would come down further and this would go down further and the thing would look sharper and tend towards something a bit more like a phase transition. But what if we increase p? Well, if we go all the way up to p equals six it gets much more complicated. Of course, if we're looking at the behavior of the occupation number this has got these oscillations. And what we see is that we've got several timescales that become very slow but instead of going down and staying down and one coming back up these timescales stick together and they have these oscillations and these oscillations match essentially perfectly what's happening in the photon number. And in fact, they were present back in p equals three even though we couldn't see any signature in the photon number. So really this is telling us that the dynamics is leading to this oscillation and there are signatures in these timescales which are much more complicated the kinds of dynamical transitions seen in simpler oscillators. Now, of course, once we have slow timescales we can simplify the problem and we can start to ask what these eigenvalues mean physically and I don't want to go into the details but what Ben found was that essentially you can match up the oscillations in the number with oscillations in a timescale which basically describes the rate at which the system goes from one of these points at a large amplitude back towards the origin. But it's a difficult system to describe and we don't have a fully intuitive description of why these oscillations have arisen and that's something we're still working on. But let me now talk just a little bit about the multimode case and this was stimulated by some experiments that were in the Cohen-Hurven group and in this case they took their device and they embedded it in a high-cutivity using the Riemberg approach to bias the voltage without damaging the queue. So they had the DC voltage bias here and they looked at the emission from the fundamental mode as a function of the voltage and they did this then sweeping up to levels where the voltage corresponds not just to where you would expect the fundamental mode to be but of order 10 times that. So this is an enormously high voltage compared to the fundamental frequency and you might think, well, could this be some 10-photon process? But absolutely not because the quantum fluctuations here are very, very weak and the multi-photon processes depend on powers of the quantum fluctuations. So they're very strongly suppressed. But what the system does have is lots of modes and these have a high queue. And so in this case, there's something going on with the mode. So basically one mode is becoming excited and somehow the energy is getting transferred down to the fundamental mode where we're seeing this strong emission coming from. And so that raises lots of questions about what happens in these multimode systems. And we go back to that initial Hamiltonian but now we have to worry about the sum here and the different modes involved. And when we look at this at first sight, we see that the point is that the Josephson junction here couples together all of these modes. And so naively, you might think, well, this is some kind of all-to-all coupling. They're all coupled together. So maybe some kind of mean field theory might be appropriate here. But this isn't the case at all because these modes are all oscillating at particular frequencies, which are different. They also have different zero point fluctuation strengths of the way that they get coupled together depends very much on the frequencies and the Josephson frequency itself. So most of the coupling won't be important and it isn't a mean field problem. So to address this, we can think about a simple model in which we excite at some harmonic of the fundamental mode and we have an ideal dispersion with each of the modes at integer values of the fundamental. We assume a constant damping and we assume that there's some number of modes that's relevant. Of course, there will be some cutoff in the system but that will be smooth but just to make life easier, we're going to assume that that's a hard cutoff. And this was the kind of model that Ben was talking about on Wednesday but I'm going to look at it from a different point of view in terms of where this transition comes from, how the fundamental mode gets exciting. And so the place to start with something that's complicated is the classical dynamics. So turning these operators into amplitudes and we've then got this Hamiltonian and exploring what happens numerically essentially. And one neat thing to look at is the total phase across all of the oscillators. And as you increase the Jowson energy, the system goes from oscillating at the drive frequency set by, with a period set by the Jowson frequency to the period set by the fundamental mode. So what you get below the threshold is this red curve which has sort of sawtooth oscillations with period set by the Jowson frequency and then that period shifts. So the period in the Hamiltonian no longer describes the oscillations above the transition. And this was something that was looked at by Simon Cooper who actually found that despite the fact that this is a very complicated problem, you can find an analytic description for this state, this sawtooth state that emerges with the period of the fundamental mode if you make some approximations. What they didn't look at was exactly how this transition occurs and when it occurs. So if we look at this classical dynamics in systems where we now we excite here at a frequency that matches the third harmonic. And we have a system here with 11 modes and another one here with 12 modes. And then we ask what happens basically as we increase the Jowson energy. So initially we have the mode that's resonant with the Jowson frequency excited but also the mode that's at twice that frequency and the one that's at three times that frequency also gets excited as well. And then we have an abrupt transition where all the modes get excited including the fundamental. And in this case it's continuous transition with the amplitude of the fundamental mode going continuously. But if we change the number of modes then it's no longer a continuous transition. It becomes discontinuous, there's a sudden jump and what you see is that in fact it's suppressed. This transition occurs quite a lot later in this case. Now, if we want to try and analyze when these occur this discontinuous transition is very difficult because we don't really know where it's going to settle down to. This case where the transition is continuous is much easier because all we have to do is find out where this state where most of the modes are not oscillating becomes unstable. And so that's something that we can seek to address. What we do need to know is what the amplitudes are what fixed points are for these modes that get excited early on. So there's some small subset of the modes that will get excited without a threshold. And we need to know what their amplitudes are but we know that the other modes start from zero. And so that makes locating this transition feasible. And so that's something that we've worked on a bit. So these continuous transitions when they can occur occur at relatively low EJ compared to the discontinuous because they boil down to relatively low order processes. And those are favored when the quantum fluctuations are weak. We can analyze this by thinking about a certain set of modes which are excited the resonant mode and the harmonics of that and modes that aren't excited at all. And we can again use the rotating wave approximation. And what we see is that the modes that are not excited initially fall into different subspaces. So for example, here we've got 13 modes and we're exciting in resonance with the seventh one. And there's a subspace involving one, two, three, four of the modes. And that subspace is where the excitation starts at the transition in this case. So in fact, not all of the modes necessarily go at once at these transitions, they split into subspaces and if we know what the behavior of the modes that get excited is, then we can use that to figure out where this transition is going to occur. And it turns out that you can actually analyze the problem to find these fixed points even when there are several excited modes quite efficiently. And that's something that Ben and Kiran looked at. So just to finish off, I just wanna show you some results for the critical coupling as a function of the number of modes, four cases where we excite the mode that's at twice the fundamental frequency and the mode that's three times the fundamental frequency. And the points here are plotted where there's a continuous transition and where we can figure this out using this stability analysis, the region here is marking where discontinuous transitions occur and we have to work hard to go looking for exactly where these happen. So for example here, with N equals eight here, eight modes where we're exciting the mode with frequency three times the fundamental, we have a transition here. But if we remove one of the modes, then we have instead a discontinuous transition and it doesn't occur until a stronger couple. So as we're adding modes, there are particular values that reduce the transition that facilitate it. And these are basically given by an integer times the mode number that we're driving minus one. And one way of thinking about what's happening, why these are special, is that as we add one of these modes here, we can then excite that and the fundamental using the drive, but also photons from the resonantly excited system. And so in terms of the unexcited modes, these as we get to one of these values, which is special, we can facilitate the transition because we turn on processes where we can draw energy from the resonantly excited mode and basically use that to facilitate the lower order process in the unexcited modes. Okay, so I think my time is running out. So I just want to leave you with my conclusions. I think these higher order processes are really exciting. They don't happen very often. And I think there's some evidence that they're really doing things that are interesting, something in between very low and very high photon numbers, where quantum effects are still important, which is unusual. And we're looking for an intuitive picture of that. We're also pursuing this multi-mode problem. And as you heard on Wednesday from Ben, one of the issues there is looking at basically what the quantum fluctuations are, what the entanglement is. In particular, Ben spoke about that below the threshold. But I'd like to stop now and thank you for listening. Thanks a lot, Andrew. So the floor is open for questions, Fabian. Hey, Fabian Hasler here. Thanks for the nice talk. I have actually a question to the first part and one to the second. So to the first part, it's like you introduced this delta as the coupling strength. Did you think about going to very large delta, at least in the theoretical analysis, because something special happens for delta equal 1? And the second question is like it seems in the second part everything seems to depend on this cut-off. And yeah, have you been thinking about making the cut-off a bit softer? OK, so the first question, I think yes. So the delta parameter is key, absolutely. And I think we've seen, of course, from Deni that you can have this parameter of order unity. And that really does suppress the phase space. And if you continue making it smaller, then yes, the phase space gets smaller. But these are processes that, because they're six-photon processes, kind of require a certain size to work properly. And so I think what I would argue is that if you make delta too large, then things actually become less interesting again in this case. So these oscillations, I think they're most sharply defined. And you can worry about what the spacing is and a value that's below 1. As you start to go higher, the first one is still there. The second one is barely there. And you wouldn't think that there was a sequence of them. And as you increase delta even further, you're really pushing this phase space down. And so these features, I think, are damaged, actually, in that limit. In terms of the multi-mode problem with the sharp cutoff, yes, I think absolutely. I think a smooth cutoff is certainly more realistic. But I think this is quite a nice place to start. And it's complicated enough. And I think it's a nice way to try and understand what these modes are actually doing. And then when you introduce a smooth cutoff, those features will get washed out. So for example, one thing we have done is increase the damping with mode number. That's one way to implement the cutoff. And what you find, of course, then is that basically as you keep adding modes, at some point it makes no difference, because those modes are highly damped. So yes, that's an important thing to do. But I think it's still quite fun to look at this in the slightly simpler case with the sharp cutoff and just see what's happening with these additional modes. OK, thank you. And I have a short question related to the second part, to the multi-mode. Do you think that you can understand all your results in terms of Flocke theory? I mean, all the multi-mode structure that emerge could be explained in terms of Flocke multi-mode resonances. You have a driven system, and your structures seems to me that it looks like the one that you can obtain from the Flocke structure. Yes, that's a very interesting point. Yes, I think that would be a good thing to do. I mean, at the moment, our main focus was really on trying to understand where these transitions occur. And so most of the modes aren't oscillating, and so that's not a problem. And then what you have to do is find what the state of these excited modes are. And we did find a way to do that. We haven't used the Flocke approach. If you, what we try and do is with the rotating wave approximation, just make essentially the simplest analysis where the time drops out for analyzing those six points. Thank you very much, Andy, for the nice presentation. I would very much like to discuss many of these issues with you. As you know, there is one, say, speculative question. Do we learn something when we consider the limit where the whole system tends towards a field theory? So considering the limit where you consider a field theory, do you think we learn something from this limit, which can, say, provide more input or other perspective than what you have shown? Yes, I think so. I mean, that isn't something I've tried to do, but I think the field theory limit would be interesting. And I think, I mean, more generally, I think these systems, they give rise to potentially very interesting nonlinear theory, field theories. So yes, I think that would be interesting. Sorry, maybe I can ask a quick question about these oscillations. Is there a correlation where I could see them in particular in a stronger way? Is it the spectrum or some other correlation in the system for the first part? Well, I mean, these oscillations are at present a very basic level in the most obvious observable, the average occupation number in the system. Or that striking quality. So you don't really need to go to something more complicated. The system is, classically, there's a bifurcation, but it doesn't tell you where the system is going to be. And what we see is that quantum mechanically, the system really takes a long time to decide where it wants to be. And essentially, it goes backwards and forwards. And that's so it's present really just at the occupation number level without going beyond that. I mean, of course, you can look at more complicated features as well. OK, thank you. Good. Are there more questions? I think not. And let's thank Andrew again.


Hey, what's up coach? This video is not something I was planning on doing today But I just got back from a training session and I saw an email Come in from one of the coaches that is in my business coaching program He shares his story about how he started his business. He went from $18,000 his first year now. He's on pace to making over $200,000 this was two and a half years later in his business He's been a part of my program for the last couple years Really awesome story here. So what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna pull up his video You can watch it. Make sure you watch it from start to finish This is meant to inspire you To show you what's possible, right? You've heard me talk about success stories all the time on this YouTube channel from coaches that we help you'll hear it straight from him and Let me share this real quick and I'll press the play button. You can watch it Hello guys, my name is Hector Cantele and the founder of mages, which is a personal training academy for soccer players located in Memphis, Tennessee here in the United States so Before I met Ben and before I joined you must my program my business was doing alright I was okay at the time was just me and But definitely I didn't have the tools to Make my business more safe or more secure if that makes sense. I felt like I was doing things Out of the box out of the blue. I was not following a system. I didn't know how to Share the message to the parents that egg, you know, this is something serious It's different than any other personal trainer out there But overall, you know, to be honest, I felt like I was doing okay. I was doing good because of my Dead relations that I build here in Memphis, you know, I'm a former University of Memphis soccer player So that definitely helped me You know get clients and knowing people or that I didn't have any issues the biggest issue for me Was not having a system that will work for the economy long-term then Fast forward to May 2019 or May or June around that time That's when I decided to join the mass on our program for Ben I actually he gave me a thing. It was like a one or two week trial Trial of the program for free So I hope they need a few calls for free kind of like learn of what he was doing what he was talking about So as soon as I log into the trial I for after a first day, I know it's okay. Shoot. I need to jump into this and getting both because he actually knows what he's talking about and I did and after I joined the program Should I mean he had he had all the system systems in place, you know Payments, you know agreements with the players with it and with the parents I mean everything how to set up a camp how to run clinics Follow-ups how to a follow-up how to talk to parents He even had the script of a conversation that you should have with the parent Over the phone before a player commits to it So that was exactly what I was what I was looking for Because I needed something that will give more prestige to the academy and the system Allow me to do that The payment set up the way he serves the payments the same thing, you know the script to talk to parents same thing I mean since 2019 right now we're into 2021 and I still follow his script and that's what that's what has allowed me to close so many clients and now Fast forward to now 2021 You know when I started with him. It was just me Now I have three other coaches that work in the academy You know back in the day. I used to coach You know I used to have 10 to 12 sessions a week So 10 to 12 players per per week overall now because we've grown so much We coached 60 65 kids on a weekly basis. We just finished the summer. We had three summer camps Where we had in one camp. We had 16 players in the other camp. We had 19 players and in this last camp we had 17 players We do at least four six clinics per year I mean the growth has has been exponential in all aspects and that's been thanks to his mentorship. Thanks to The system that has he has in place to me That's the most important thing when it comes to any type of business Especially this one you need to have a system in place that works for you Because that's what that's what is going to allow you grow and you know Help more kids and you know grow your business even more so Definitely this bench program I would recommend it to Anybody else, you know anybody out there that wants to any personal training soccer football golf tennis any sport whatever it is because What he has in place? it's only I mean, it's something that I haven't seen any like anywhere else and His system works. I'm the living proof that it worked again. I Was lucky enough to have a good connection. So my me starting out my business was not that hard but what what allowed me to have a exponential growth was his system and Just to give you an idea my first year in business. I Started half a towards May June of 2018 I did like $18,000 that year then the following year 2019. I joined Ben's program We may I we made $60,000 in revenue Then last year we made a hundred and twenty thousand dollars in revenue. We had a hundred percent Increased in revenue and this year so far where I'm right now We're at a hundred and twenty thousand dollars For the year so far, and we're expecting to reach 250,000 for the year so Almost not not almost but not fully a hundred percent In revenue, but still exponential growth. So definitely if you're thinking about it either should you join or not? Stop thinking about it. It's worth it Every penny is worth it. I I'm at the point that you know, I know the teams or most of the things that he has in the program and I'm still I'm part of the mastermind program because we have like a group chat in there like a Where we can ask any type of questions I and every once in a while I have questions and his answers are what helps me move forward with my business So definitely recommend it, you know, Ben super thankful for your help in every aspect Yeah, see you guys soon Bye-bye All right Now if you just got done watching that video and you're not part of my program yet All you have to do if you want to apply to get results like this is You go to the first link in the description right under this video. I have a video. It's an application You watch a quick video and then you apply for my program. So every week I have limited spots For my application calls My program is certainly not a fit for everybody But the way I have my program set up now You get lifetime access to the program once you join You get everything inside my courses you get weekly calls for life and You have access to our community and all of the new products and course material that we create it comes with your account And we've been in the process of developing a lot of new courses. So pretty awesome deal Hector is a great example of a code to joins and takes action and gets results And I'm looking for more for more coaches that are like that so if that's you go down below this video and apply for my program and That's all I got for you today, and I'll see you soon


Hey guys, welcome back.  I'm Shannon and today on the show we're taking a look at the Hasbro Plasmus series Ghostbusters. Peter Venkman. Today's Thursday on Tuesday we did a showcase of the entire series right here. So if you missed that go back check on it. It's in the Ghostbusters playlist. You can also find it on the home page for the channel. Now as I said I'm going to be covering each figure each day each Tuesday and Thursday for the next few weeks. Today we're doing Peter and then we're going to go in order from the back of the box. Peter is first followed by Ray which will be next Tuesday and then Egon next Thursday. Winston the following Tuesday. Dana the following Thursday. Gozer the Tuesday after that and Vince Clortho the Thursday after that. As I said in the previous video I only publish videos on Tuesdays and Thursdays unless it's something that just cannot wait. So as you can see here let's go ahead and move Venkman out of the way. One each figure does come in a clamshell packaging like this. This of course is uh Gozer's clamshell comes with this as well as a cover for the front so you can't take the figures out.  Blueprints for the proton pack and proton wand. It's very nice. Let's go ahead and open that up and take a look at that more in depth. As you can see there and as you can see we've got the Ecto one there. Really cool. And these do you can open these up. They're just tabbed in place so you can see the whole thing. That's nice. I like that. I may actually keep these for a while anyway. Now we'll go ahead and put them back in the box. And now these the plasma series does not go with or come with any instructions whatsoever. They come with a little thing. Little piece of paper but that's not instructions. However I will show you how to put the proton pack on during the course of these videos. And they're all fairly simple except for Ray. Ray is a little bit bulky for his proton pack. Peter does come with the leg of Vince Chlorotho. It's the maybe it's either the front or back leg. It's kind of hard to determine in this image. I think it might be the hind leg. So it comes it's the right hind leg of Vince Chlorotho. And we'll go over all the articulation with this when we build the pterodog. Now we take a look at Peter Venkman. And he's a nice figure. The face sculpt though isn't that great. It's okay. Yeah it could definitely be better. I could not find a place really to attach the trap. So I just have it attached where his two-way radio is. Yeah there really is no other place to put it. You can't really put it well. Yeah you can't really put it on the proton pack at all. So the best place I found to put it is hanging on his two-way radio. Just like that. And let's take a look at the sculpt of that real quick. It does not come with a pedal or anything like that. However there is an indention here. Let me see if there's a place for that. No it doesn't really look like it. But it's hollow. It's made out of a soft almost rubbery plastic. The doors do not open. In fact you can barely make out where the separation between the doors is. I don't know if you can see that there right in the middle. There's just a slight indention there to show the separation of the doors. And they did the paint just complete. They didn't even put it off just a little bit to make it look like there are two doors there. But overall it's nice even though it does not come with a foot switch. And then for Venkman his the hardest thing about these figures is putting the neutrino wands in their hands. But they do attach to the proton pack. And as you can see there's a hole in the neutrino wand right there that attaches to this peg on the proton pack. Just like that. Now they did make Peter's pants, pant legs a little higher than what I think they should have been. And that was mainly for the articulation of the foot it looks like. So that's not too bad. You know they could have put it a little bit lower but I mean it looks like he's planning for water there. And I'm sorry guys I don't know what's going on with my voice. I may be losing it or I may just have a frog in my throat. I don't know. But anyway the proton packs do come off. And there's just a peg right there that you make sure this arm straight and there's a peg on the back that holds it into the back. And you just slide it off just like that. There's the peg and there's a hole in his back where it slides into. And you can leave the proton packs off if you want and it just snaps right back into place. It sits straight up no no problem at all. And yeah the detail on this proton pack is nice. I really like it. And of course there's only one red piece on the lights of the back to show that the lights are alternating. Real quick we'll go ahead and zoom in on this proton pack so you guys can take a look at everything going on with the sculpt. All right so now we'll go ahead and move that out of the way. And we'll take a look at Peter Venkman. So for articulation on Venkman he has he does have multiple points of articulation. Number one is the head is on a ball joint turn side to side look down look up that far looks down that far. So not a huge huge amount of articulation. He can't look down super low and he can't look up high very low either or very much either. He does have bicep articulation a bicep swivel right there. Ball joint and hinge at the shoulder his arms can go up that high. They can rotate all the way around and I already did the bicep articulation. He has a double elbow joint which are really stiff right out of the package so you got to be careful with those which gets him him quite a bit of articulation in the elbow. Then for the waist not a lot of so I mean they can go all the way around if you wanted to but the belt it is pretty tight and the belt is a separate rubbery piece so it does not move along with the waist articulation.  There's something you don't see every day. Let's go ahead and bring this back try not to break it and of course as I said he's got ankle articulation his foot can go down that far it can go up about that far and can tilt side to side there's the outside tilt which is quite a bit and the inside tilt which is also quite a bit and I have to say he stands pretty good with or without his proton pack so there he is without the proton pack standing very nicely. Now we'll go ahead and put the proton pack back on and show you how he stands with the proton pack. So you just slide his arm through there first and then his head through and peg it to the back and then this is the trickier part on each of the figures try and do you clip it back. Peter Winston and Egon are easier to do than Ray because Ray's a little bit chunkier there he is holding the ghost trap in fact we'll go ahead and mount that where do we want to mount it do we want to mount it back on the two-way radio yeah that's a good place for it I think and now we'll move him back there he is standing up and we will compare him to the other Peter Venkman's all right so first we'll compare him to the 2016 release Peter Venkman and he is just a little bit shorter than that Peter not a whole lot just a little bit let's go ahead and measure him he stands in just under six inches tall whereas the 2016 Peter Venkman is right at six inches and now we'll bring in I believe this is the diamond select Peter Venkman from Ghostbusters 2 even though the the figure has an appearance in uh Ghostbusters the first Ghostbusters movie along with the taxi ghost they put him as Ghostbusters 2 so there he is with that and that Peter Venkman is about the same height as the 2016 release and now we'll also just for fun put him next to the real Ghostbusters Peter Venkman which obviously there's a huge height difference with so there you have it guys this has been the 2020 Hasbro Plasma Series Peter Venkman with Vince Clartho build a figure rear right leg hope you guys enjoyed this video make sure you tune in next Tuesday for our review on Ray Stans take care Geeks if you enjoyed that video make sure you hit the subscribe button right there so you stay up to date on all things geek culture also go ahead and check out one of these two playlists on the side for more videos just like the one you just watched I'm Shannon for Comic NTV the only place on YouTube where all geek culture collides take care Geeks


Russia and China reached agreement with Houthis, two country ships will not be attacked by group. The Yemen-based Houthi militants have told Russia and China that their ships can sail freely through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden without fear of being attacked. Bloomberg reported citing sources. People with knowledge of the matter told the outlet that the understanding was reached during talks in Oman involving Russian and diplomats and a top Houthi political figure. According to Bloomberg's sources, in exchange for promising safe passage for ships, the Houthis want the two countries to provide political support for the rebel group in international bodies such as the UN Security Council. The Houthi rebels have carried out dozens of drone and missile attacks on commercial vessels traversing the Red Sea, disrupting shipping traffic through one of the world's most important maritime corridors. As a result, many major shipping companies have stopped using the Suez Canal and are instead redirecting ships around the Cape of Good Hope in Southern Africa. The Houthis have been attacking ships they believe to be linked to Israel in what they claim is a show of solidarity with the Palestinian people in light of the war in Gaza. After the US and UK conducted a number of strikes on Houthi facilities in Yemen, the group said it would now also attack ships affiliated with both nations. In a recent such incident, Yemeni missiles struck the merchant vessel True Confidence in the Gulf of Aden earlier this month, causing the first deaths since the militant group started its attacks. The Houthis claimed the vessel was American. However, according to a Bloomberg source, the ship used to be owned by Los Angeles-based Oak Tree Capital, but a new non-US company had taken it over. A senior Houthi political leader Ali Al-Kum declared recently on X that the group's goal is sinking America, Britain and the West in the swamp of the Red Sea.


Everybody forced here ripping 2022 tops tier one baseball hobby 12 bucks haste number 30 random team style I'll show the results right here from the random. You can always find them late in sports cards calm Good luck in the break. Thanks everybody. Let's see what we got Best meal we had was at Carmines where we got to see Floyd. It was a distributor event Little dinner like a banquet kind of Open bar the food was great. It's like a coursed out meal banquet style really really good Good Caesar good penny the penny all of vodka was amazing. I Wouldn't hate Denver Denver would be cool. I just don't know is like Oh, that was one of that's one of the places. I would love to go visit Denver You could do like an Arizona show to honestly. Yeah, Arizona Vegas somewhere in there Indy wouldn't be bad Arizona would get draw though close to close to a Vegas in LA They should be a lot of resorts out there They always have big events already in Vegas. That's my thing with Dallas. I already have big events there They should still do it though game use Jersey Giants Brandon Crawford 399 Got TJ Fridtler rookie auto to 299 Reds You got a stray away from one of the sides of the country though Carlos Delgado auto to 299 blue jays That's my thing about the national. I think one in LA would be pretty dope. Yeah, I don't think you could But that was like the only good meal I had Atlantic City to be quite honest You can ask illegal we went to we went to dinner one night with Lane and some of his friends and Caleb and the place You went to it was interesting Orioles Mancini Jersey to 399 the bartender took our drink orders one at a time Dodgers auto Gavin Lux to 199. There's a lot of good places to have Yeah Get your Muto auto to 299 Phillies and I know we're completely biased here But if you want a place That can handle a ton of people and has a lot of big big conventions regularly Orlando Yeah, I know it's far away for a lot of people on the West Coast, but it is like the ideal location to have convention Hotels everywhere there's like a ton of stuff to do in the immediate area Disney is like 10 minutes away You got Mullins Jersey to 399 Orioles. It literally is like a perfect place except that it's on one side of the country Marlin's rookie auto Nick Fortes to 199 and a Reds out of 20 Perez to 299 Met grandpa shorts met grandpa. Yeah. Yeah. Heck. Yeah, they were having a good time Adelaire Wi-Fi. I don't know but if you're using Wi-Fi at the national you were S. O. Well, thank God We've paid for Ethernet Jersey ashows at 249 you ordered on Alvarez I thought being a huge issue in 2016 before cards were cool Dodgers Jersey Clayton Kershaw at 249 Yeah, if you're gonna set up a booth the national for whatever reason or if you're with somebody pay for Ethernet every single time Adela's Garcia auto to 199 Rangers It is literally must if you need the internet for anything Ashows auto Kyle Tucker to 299 She's that tough rap Atlas. Yeah, yesterday Red Sox He hits it into into right field and for Dugos like against the wall about jumping up the wall and then gets down and catches on the track For to go thought that thing was going 500 feet. I think I think you fooled Tucker, honestly Nice and Austin Riley dual patch for Atlanta to 25 Oh, yeah for sure he's second in the National Lincoln homers, right? Yeah He's been fantastic got that nice contract for him, too Lucas G. Leto auto to 299 White Sox. I mean After a cuneck, he's the most important guy in that team. I would think yeah Royals Jersey auto at Merrifield to 99. Yeah, the Wi-Fi was just did not work the first the first Day we had to stream on the Wi-Fi Luckily everyone else was setting up at the time We were the people breaking the earliest that day as like the Wednesday is like set up and then like the previews that night If anyone else was on that thing during the day, we'd have been screwed. No game. Here's Jersey Red Sox Rafael Devers at 299 Little bit of dirt. It looks like on there. It's really hard to see with the camera That Yankees auto loot voids out of 299 it's two teams removed from Yankees now Nationals legend Nationals legends and a blue jays auto to Oscar Hernandez at 299 and then by by Friday Saturday with the heaviest traffic days The Wi-Fi was no good and you could not get there. So I could not send texts Luckily, we were in the breakers of only which had a lot less traffic and we're close to the exit So I could send text to like I could send text, but I could not get on the internet whatsoever. Even on Wi-Fi. It was so bad Red Sox Jersey card David Ortiz the 399 Stop six six. What up, buddy? Jersey card Dodgers Walker Bueller to 249. Yep Exactly stony. It's almost not an option if you need the internet Reds auto Alejo Lopez the 299. Yep and faster. Yeah, we had like Was it called 10 I feel like 10 ping I guess 10 up 10 down get Barry Larkin the 65 on the Reds auto and we got ethernet that was closer to 20, which is what we're used to here Yeah, so it worked out well It is for sure hotter than Here There's two weather types in Florida right now Scorching hot to where you cannot go outside or the worst under storm you've seen this year Yep, Rocky's Jersey game use Larry Walker to 299 You can go outside before 9 a.m. And only sweat a little bit Billy's J.T. Romuto Jersey to 399 jeez Orioles auto Trey Mancini to 299. Oh Did I got to bring in the cards that illegal actually gave me Shane Bosz rookie auto to 299 Rays I was gonna buy some wax, but I'm glad I didn't because we barely fit everything in all of our bags I had to carry like some sealed wax for Caleb that he bought like the last day or Lane in my backpack Each of our carry-ons had a way at least We broke all the rules dear D-backs bat relic could tell Marta to 399 It's still probably worth it Sam. Absolutely worth it. Yeah Absolutely Guardian's auto from you'll ray as to 299 max month the auto to 299 Dodgers. Let me get some water guys Still got national throat still messing me up legal is that from goodwin champions? The train that that I was falling asleep at with the legal answer Jersey card Braves John Smoltz 399. Oh Do one of the meals we got so after Wednesday we broke 1030 to like midnight yeah got a Kyle Lewis auto to 199 Mariners bronze auto Red Sox JD Martinez to 25 We walked down the boardwalk a bit and found this like it looked like it was out of like a carnival It was just like a big long like window with like cases of pizza and stuff And they had like a grill they were doing like your own isn't like And it was legit like 1 30 a.m. And it was like it was like what you would expect on the boardwalk at 1 30 a.m Yeah, and we all ordered just a ton of like greasy food It's like courtese Lane field like cheese fries and euros and fried Oreos and stuff Mariana Rivera Jersey to 249 a Yankees nice Moe Twins auto Justin more node at 299 and Mariners auto rookie Cal Raleigh to 249 big dumper six What is this? It's a thickie. We got a book We got a book y'all last box Jersey card angels Jared Walsh 399. I didn't see who it was, but usually it's a dual auto dual rally book Silver Simeon for the J's auto to 10 So let's see what it is. We're gonna find out together. I didn't even I didn't peak Yeah dual auto rally book card Come on now What do we got?  I'm gonna get a pick of that and then we're gonna do a recap So we take a look that I'll start to recap get a nice peek at that. I'm gonna get a pick We're gonna get it put away nice and safe.  Yeah, it relics. We had your Walsh Rivera Smoltz Marte real Muto Walker Bueller Walker Bueller. It's Larry Walker and then Poppy Devers Riley Kershaw Yordan Mullins Mancini Crawford Brandon Crawford not Carl Red Sox Lane Marcus Simeon Silver Blue Jays Cal Raleigh Justin Morneau JD Martinez bronze Kyle Lewis Max Muncie Fran Milrea's Shane Bodge Trey Mancini Barry Larkin Alejo Lopez Teosca Hernandez Luke Voight as a Yankee with Merrifield G. Leto Kyle Tucker Adolas Garcia Tony Perez Nick Fortes real Muto Lux Delgado as a blue J and bridal Thanks again everybody more tier one coming up


Open access is important because from my experience doing research in innovation networks in the Danish clinic industry, I can see the disconnection between what is already out there in terms of research and what are the requirements of the industry. One of the main reasons of this disconnection is that especially for SMEs, it's difficult to access and have visibility of what researchers can offer. If we increase this visibility and this access, we can see a much faster development of critical solutions in this clinic space and in general increase innovation.


You got an ad party? Yeah. Was it good or just a small amount of beer on the end? Would it have been good? Well, I'm trying to have a haircut, sorry. Your photo will be like, is it a sticker or something? All of Marius can get it. Marius. There's sticker. I already have one. So, you know, right? Oh, kind of longer. I think it's still... Oh, let's see. Well, I'm in touch. So we have the... Oh, yeah. Okay, so you're basically... out in the hall. How do I make one of these be my, you know, other screen? Okay, you have to... You just choose... Right? So choose X and Y. And you have to... Yeah, I think we have to... Oh, there we go. Koty, let's have a look. Let's see what you're trying to do. Wait a minute. I think it's from the computer. It doesn't work? Well, if it does, then it doesn't work. Because it's a nice computer. And it's a computer? Yeah. Well, we don't have to go to the projector, so we can do it. It won't work, right? No. And maybe it's from another computer. Okay, so... Yep. Thank you. Let's see if we can actually... Such sorcery. That second screen? Yeah. On both? Yeah. Yeah, all good? Cool. Here you have the... the stuff. Yeah. Now we can... Do you want a clicker? No, no, no. Take some, alright. Thank you. You can use it, but it doesn't work. If it doesn't work, then it doesn't work. What do you want? It doesn't work.  No. Okay, if we can use it, then I'll take it. Okay? Okay. You can use it, but it doesn't work. I think you don't need it. Yeah. It doesn't work at all. How long does it take? About 20 minutes. It doesn't work like yesterday, so... There's a lot of work left. You're breaking the numbers. You're selling it, so you're recording it. Okay. I'll put it in the stream, so... What did you do with the stream? I did it on the live. Where's Mike? Who's Mike? Mike. If you can use it on your own, then you can use it on your own. I don't use it on my own. There are problems with the plan, because they're not allowed to use it on the live. They're not allowed to use it on live. I'll take it. I'll take it. You can use it on your own. I'll take it. You can use it on your own. I'll take it. You can use it on your own. They usually use it on live. We have it here for example, for one person. Yes. But when it's on a relatively high level, it's the same for the other person. It's not... Also, if there are good questions, or if there are some things you want to say. Yeah. These cards, and here's your water. Okay. As much as you want. We have a question for you. No, no. The water is only for speaking. And that... If you have some slides, you can just give it to me. Yeah, just after the presentation. Okay. In the builder... So it's out of here. And you were like, maybe you should find a way to better process that. Yeah, it's an excellent piece of paper. It's a morning argument. I remember when I started studying at that university. I used to have one friend in the presentation at a big university, you know, from Sweden. We heard it all, completely out. But it was okay. It was okay about us.  Never. But do you check out your own writing? Well, the department is reparking. I am a little scared that nobody will be there. I will have a presentation. People are going to reparkation. Yeah. It's good for the people after marketing. Yeah, I know. It's got to start at the end of the act. Let me actually change that. So that's right. I mean, as people talk, we can write on board the kind of stuff we want to do and talk about. And then we can either split up or get people started. Yeah. I mean, people probably show up later. Because someone came early. Most people are. So, I mean, does anyone have the topics that you want to dive into? That you already have a plan or a vibe?  There's things like playing with the tests and testing your other stuff. There's things like fixing bugs, breaking things, security updates. So, I think we have a bunch more. So, I'm learning as a registry container. In one of the states, it's built. Do you have something you want to do? It's like that. Yeah. Yeah. Well, then they'll finish by this. Okay. Okay. Sorry, you guys can work together? Yeah. Yeah. We just showed the basic main slide here to walk through the main work spot. But, so you don't have to manage the lines? No. Well, we have to set up the work. We have to set up the work. We have to set up the work. Right. Let's just come up with something. Let's start with the door out. Maybe, it would be nice. How to send or write. Set up the machine in a copy. How to send some commands to the machine. It's a problem, right? But that's the right way of doing it. So, do some plugin that is able to send a command to every machine. For example, for less of root directory. It doesn't matter. Let's make it more general. How it gets implemented, of course. So, it's pretty easy. So, really, all of this is installed for instance. So, in that way, everything is the same. So, I think you can probably, do you have to take those names or something? I don't know. Well, okay, yes. So, I mean, this is like, for the, it puts very kind of, I mean, you know, your question is, so now we're going to talk about how we can be as easy as we can. Yeah, I mean, the same, like, I think I'm trying to talk about something in more of a manner.  We're talking about it. I'm going to say this is pretty, I don't know if I'm going to say this right now. Right? Okay. So, I think it's going to start, any work that we're supposed to do, essentially, it's all over both of you. Yeah, I think we should, this might be very good. But is someone, actually, I don't know, is someone to be able to run it now?  That's your goal. You know what I'm just saying? Okay. Okay. Right here. Okay. Okay. Okay. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, yeah. So, so, yeah. We're trying to talk about the design and, like, the virtual one. Let's do most of it. Oh, well, that's interesting. We're doing some portion of this. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Right, yeah. Yeah. Right, right, right. Okay. No.  Right, right. Yeah, absolutely. But next, defaults there are we but Yes. Yeah. Too many, like, right now, not so well, like maybe like I've had like 10, well, like maybe Yeah, then then for I think current stuff, like, and that's the scale, adding, like, all, so everybody can have, like, Oh, okay. Oh, good. Yeah. All right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Right, right. Yeah. Yeah.  All right, yes. These are all for the browns. Do you want to show them? Yeah. Yeah, we want some. That's it. Okay. Do you want some butter? Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay.