I report on hate crimes for pro-publica. You can think of a hate crime as a crime committed against somebody because of who they are. Congress forced the Department of Justice to collect information on hate crimes starting in 1990. One of the greatest obligations of this administration and of the Department of Justice is the guarantee of civil rights for all Americans. Hate crimes cannot be tolerated in a free society. But many police departments don't actually report their hate crimes to the FBI, assuming they have been marked them down at all. We called every state agency charged with setting police academy training standards and we asked if they provided training on hate crimes. And we sent more than 350 public records requests to law enforcement agencies across the country to see how they tracked hate crimes. From talking to experts, we knew that hate crime reporting was spotty at best, but the results of our investigation were surprising even to me. Of the more than 15,000 law enforcement agencies that report hate crimes at the FBI, 88% of those just simply say they have none. Law enforcement agencies in seven of the 20 largest cities in the United States either severely underreport or don't report hate crimes at all. In the South, hate crimes are rarely reported. So why is law enforcement failing to report hate crimes? Well part of it is that officers get little to no training. What we found is that only 12 states have statutes that require police academies to train on hate crimes. Another problem? Just not doing it. Like at the Miami-Dade County Police Department, where officers said they just didn't fill out hate crime report forms. And a third problem? Officials confuse state laws with federal laws, like in Alabama where the state hate crime law doesn't cover homosexuality. And police officers there told us they wouldn't mark down a crime with anti-gay bias as a hate crime. This is in spite of the fact that the federal law asked them to. The problem is that people are being attacked. They're being attacked for who they are. And our law enforcement agencies by and large don't appear to understand how to handle these crimes. The FBI is required to track this information for the rest of the country, but they can't do it without support from local law enforcement agencies.


Hi, my name is William Chia. I do product marketing at GitLab. And in this video, I'm going to show you how to set up a complete deployment environment using Google Kubernetes Engine and automatically configure your CI CD pipelines using Auto DevOps. Let's get started. For the purposes of this demonstration, I'll be using a very minimal Rails app. A link to the URL for this app is in the description of this video. You can follow along by forking the app or use your own application. Now we've got a very basic app. Let's go ahead and set up a Kubernetes cluster. We're going to go to CI CD and Kubernetes, then add Kubernetes cluster. Now, GitLab can connect to any Kubernetes cluster, but the easiest way to make this happen is to use our GKE integration. So we're going to click on create on GKE to create a new cluster. Here, we can create a new Google account or sign it in with our existing account. On the cluster creation page, there's only a couple of required fields. First, we'll give the cluster a name. Then we'll provide the project ID. If you don't know your project ID, you can click on the link here to go over to your Google Cloud Platform console and see a list of projects or create one. In future versions of GitLab, we'll actually use the integration to go and fetch your project IDs and you'll be able to pick it from a dropdown list. We'll take the rest of the settings as default and click on create Kubernetes cluster. GitLab will now go and create the cluster in the background for you on Google Kubernetes Engine. This process should only take about five minutes, maybe a little bit more or a little bit less depending on how busy the system is. When the cluster is finished being created, you'll see a success message and the blue banner will disappear. Now let's install some applications to our cluster that are going to make auto DevOps work. We'll scroll down to the application section and this will make it easy for us to install these applications with just one click. First, we're going to install HelmTiller. Helm is somewhat of a package manager for Kubernetes. It allows you to install and manage other Kubernetes applications while Tiller is the server side component of that. So we're going to install HelmTiller first and that's what's going to allow us to install the other applications. Again, each installation should only take about a few minutes. Once Tiller is installed, you can go ahead and install Ingress, Prometheus and GitLab Runner. Ingress allows you to route requests from outside your cluster to services that are inside of your cluster. In essence, Ingress is going to give us an IP address that's going to allow us to access our application. Prometheus is a monitoring system that's going to give us auto monitoring and GitLab Runner is what's going to allow us to execute our CICD jobs. When Ingress is finished installing, it's going to give us the IP address that's generated for our cluster. You're going to want to take this IP address and create a wildcard DNS entry using your DNS system. I'm going to use a free service called xip.io for this demo, but you can use this IP address with any DNS system that you're currently using. For now, I'm going to copy this IP address to my clipboard and that's it. Our entire cluster is set up and all of the applications are installed really with just a few clicks. Now, we're going to set up our CICD pipelines using auto DevOps. To do this, go to the settings menu and then CICD. Under the general settings, click on enable auto DevOps. Then you're going to want to add your domain. This can be any domain name that you've had in your DNS system. Here, I'm going to use the IP address plus xip.io. This is going to generate a wildcard DNS using this free service. We'll take the rest of the settings as default and scroll down to save changes. And that's it. Now, our pipelines have been generated. We can go to the pipelines page to take a look at what's happening. Here, we can see we already have a pipeline and it's already running with just a few clicks. Let's take a look at what's happening. Here, auto DevOps has created a pipeline with four stages, build, test, production and performance. We can see that once the code is built, in the test phrase, it's going to have auto code quality, dependency scanning, static security application testing, container scanning, and it's going to run the tests before deploying that to production. Finally, once the app is in production, it's going to run some performance tests on it as well. And there you have it. In just a few minutes, and with just a few clicks, we've created a fully configured deployment environment for our application with fully configured CICD pipelines using Google Kubernetes Engine and auto DevOps. Thanks.


Welcome to the session of Market Equilibrium. These are the learning outcomes of the session. Before proceeding, let me ask you one question. What is the law of the demand? You may pause the video, think about the question and write down your answer in your notebook. After writing the answer, you can resume the video to see the answer. The law of the demand state that the quantity demanded for the goods or the services are inversely related to the selling price under the condition that all the other determinants are remaining unchanged. So, what is the market equilibrium? The market equilibrium is the state in which the market supply and the demand balances each other. And as a result, the price will become stable. It is a situation where for the particular good or the supply, the demand and the supply are equal. In the diagram as shown, the equilibrium point or the equilibrium price is the P1 and the equilibrium quantity is the Q1. So, at the price P1, the quantity which is supplied is the Q1 and we will have the equilibrium point. So, it is a point where the supply and the demand curve meet each other. It means the supply and the supply of the good is equal to the demand of the good. Generally, over supply of the good or the services cause the prices to go down, which will result the higher in the demand. Balancing effect of the supply and the demand result in the state of the equilibrium. When the market is in equilibrium, there is no tendency for the price to change. We say that market clearing price will be achieved where the buyers and the sellers meet to exchange the money for the goods. The price mechanism refers how the supply and the demand interact to set the market price and the amount of the good that has been sold. At the most prices, the planned demand does not equal to the planned supply and this is the state of this equilibrium because there is either a shortage of the supply or a surplus means excess of the supply because of that the firm has to make a decision of changing the price. The price is determined in a free market by the interaction of the supply and the demand. We can underline these three dynamics laws of the supply and the demand. When the quantity demanded is greater than the quantity which is supplied, the price tends to rise. When the quantity supplied is greater than the quantity demanded, the price tends to fall. In the market, larger the difference between the quantity supplied and the quantity demanded, the greater the pressure on the prices to rise or the prices to fall. When the quantity supplied equal to the quantity demanded, the price have no tendency to change. The price theory answers these questions of interaction of demand and the supply to determine the price of in a competitive market. Let us see an example as given in a table. At the price of 3 units, only at this price the quantity which the producers are willing to produce and the supply is identical to the amount customer are willing to pay. And as a result, there is neither shortage of the supply or nor surplus of the supply, the X at this price. A surplus causes the price to decline and shortage causes the price to rise. If the shortage of the supply means that there is a rise in the price. With neither shortage or nor surplus at the unit 3, there is no reason for the actual price of the commodity or supply X to move along this price. The price is this price is called as what the equilibrium price. The equilibrium represents the situation where there is no tendency to change the price. And it is the state of the balance. It is stated differently that the price of the X will be established where the supply decisions of producers and the demand decisions of buyers are mutually consistent. Graphically the interaction of supply and the demand curve will indicate the equilibrium point E as shown in the figure. If the market price is OP 1, the quantity demanded by the customer will be what? OQ 1. While the quantity which is with the producer wish to supply is what? OQ 2. Now, there is a thus surplus of Q 1 Q 2 at this price will be created. The surplus will need to the downward pressure on the price and so the market price will fall. And at the lower price OP 1, the quantity supplied will be what? OQ 1. While the quantity demanded is what? OQ 2. And therefore, there is will be the shortage of the supply will be created at this price. And it is represented by Q 1 and Q 2. This shortage tends to put the upward pressure on the price. The market price is expected to rise. There is only one price at which the quantity supplied and the quantity demanded are equal. There is no surplus or no shortage, no rise or fall into the price which is called as OP. And thus this refer as an equilibrium position. Let us see what is a ceiling price or price ceiling. A price ceiling keeps the price forum rising above the particular level. This called as a ceiling price. A price ceiling is mandated maximum amount the seller is allowed to charge for the product of service. Usually said by the law, the price ceiling are typically applied to only staples such as food and energy products when such good become unaffordable for the regular customers. Some areas have ceiling to protect the renters from rapidly climbing the rates of the residents. A ceiling price is essentially a type of the price control. A price ceiling can be advantageous for allowing the essentials to be at the affordable price, at least for the temporary. Let us take an example by thinking about the hypothetical town. The rent was fairly stable in that particular town. But when the town was featured in a top 10 place to leave article in the popular magazine, eventually the rent control laws were suppressed or passed. We can use the demand and the supply model, which is shown below to understand how the market changed based on these events. Now in the beginning before the article was published, the equilibrium point is 0, lay at the intersection of the supply curve S0 and the demand curve D0 corresponding to the equilibrium price of $500 and the equilibrium quantity of 15,000 units of rental house. When the article is published, the article inspired the more people will want to move from to this imaginary town. It is shifted a demand curve for rental house to the right side. It is shown in a table and it is shown in a graph from D0 to D1. In the new market, the new equilibrium point will be now even and the price of the rental unit rises to the $600 and equilibrium quantity increased to the 17,000 unit. Now let us suppose that the bunch of the residents were pretty unhappy with the paying of 20% increase in the rent. Now they will pressure the local politicians to pass the rent control law to keep the price at the original equilibrium, which is a $500 for the typical apartment. In the demand and the supply model above the horizontal lines at the price of $500 shows the legally fixed maximum price set by the rent control law. Now, however underlying forces that have been shifted down the demand curve to the right side are still there. At the fixed maximum price of $500, the quantity which is supplied will remain 15,000 rental unit. So, in other words, what will happen? The quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied and there will be the shortage of the rental houses will be created. Next is the price floor. The price floor is a situation when the price is charged more than or less than the equilibrium price and determined by the market forces of the demand and the supply. By the observation, it has been found that the lower price floors are ineffective. The price floor has been found to be great importance for the labor wage market. The price floor exists when the price artificially held above the equilibrium price and it is not allowed to fall. So, there are many examples of the price floor. In some cases, the private businesses maintain the price floor while in other cases, the government maintains the price floor. We can take a look at the demand and the supply model which is shown below. To understand the better effect of the government program that creates the price above the equilibrium, let us look into that picture. This particular model represents the market for wheat in the Europe. In the absence of the government intervention, the price of the wheat would be adjust so that the quantity supplied will be equal to the quantity demanded. That is the equilibrium point E0 with the price P0 and the quantity E0. However, the policies to keep the prices high for the farmer keeps the price above what would have been in the market equilibrium level. This price is called as a PF as shown in the figure by the horizontal line in the diagram. This will result in the quantity supplied in excess of the quantity which is demanded because of the increase in the price. So, when the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded, the surplus will be created. These are the references for the session. Thank you.


Welcome to ToffeeTV, quiet week until the storm hit on Friday night, Baz. Was it a quiet week? It was, in terms of, there was some news, was what it was. The stadium project consultations went out and Evan extended the fanatics deal. Yeah, quite, it was quite weak. Not really mattered in terms of that. To this 40 page documents are made online, but we now know it's a real document, a real, it's not fake, it hasn't been faked, it's a real consultation document with some images in, some images of stadiums, some images of, say, standing and stand steepness and just giving an over arched view of what a potential new stadium could look like on the banks of the Royal Blue Mesa. What were your thoughts on what you saw, first of all? It's difficult in it because it's still, it's very much like images of, I think when you're looking for stadium images, I think you want to see better quality pictures and how it's going to look from a certain aspect. I think just looking through the documents, it's quite obviously more technical document than it is for fans, say, to give you that overview of it. I think reading into it, yes, there's, you know, people have pulled up what Dan Mish put out or give his presentations at, you know, the chairs and stuff and have made comparisons with it and how things have changed and then, but even then, the images that he showed at those consultations, I don't think were finalised anyway, they were just examples, I think, and I think this is just examples, I'd be surprised that this is how it will ultimately be when it goes into planning. So, I don't know, I mean, that's the main thing, the main thing I'd take from it is it's not a planning document, they are blueprints, these are, like you've just said, images to show you or show people what it may look like or what the footprint would be, you know, which way the stadium would be facing, things that might surround it, how close it will be to the road, how close it will be to the river, where it would sit, all those kind of things and whereas it's lovely that we've got a little bit more information, it's also, it's also just a little bit misleading, I think, on what the stadium will look like personally. I don't think the stadium from the outside is going to look like that, I think that it's just a skid that has been put on it just to show it's a stadium, I mean, the picture from above, it's just like white, isn't it, it's just white, it's just, it's just showing you what. And that thing with Everton, isn't it, Robert Elstone used that image a few years ago on a presentation show. And I just think that's what they've done, they've just took a rough image just to use it as a, just a comparison or just to show people what, you know, a stadium would look like. So it's nice that we've got a little bit more documentation, but I think people are getting a little bit too bent on to shape about the designs, because I don't, that might have said himself and I think to get the plan of permission, I don't think it could look like that to get the plan of permission, it's got to be in keeping with the surrounding area.  With a big glass crust. I don't think that's going to happen. Sure, that's going to happen. There might be one element of it that's glass with the thing, because he did talk about the brand and look up to the city, but I think it'd look a bit different than that anyway. I think in terms of the homing, one of them's a big, steep homing, I think it looks fantastic. I think in your mind, what I can see, whether it looks like that anyway, but just when you're thinking about how it could look with the blue seats, I think that looks... Well, the inside, I mean, the inside of it, I think that's slightly different, because how many different ways can you do the inside of a brand, you know what I mean? You're looking at space at the moment, space has got that fantastic one piece in, but the rest of it looks like a bulkier white-art line, I mean, the outside looks absolutely amazing, but the inside is what it is, it's an amazing cheese, by the way. No, they've got me to the cheese room, which is really disappointing, yeah. What can you do? No, I think you're right. I think there's only so much you can do with the stadium inside to make it, you know. I think it looks fine, kind of the way it is. It's not a bowl, and he said it wouldn't be a bowl, and it doesn't look like a bowl. I don't know whether they've... It's difficult, because I know, speaking to John Blaine, he's talking about, you know, different scalings and executive boxes and stuff like that, we don't know whether they're going to cut those executive boxes down, or whether we need more for corporate. There's a lot of stuff about how much the price will be and, you know, the capacity, but if they're doing a 52,000-seater stadium when Dan Meister is doing it, then... And this is a 52,000-seater stadium, then how can it be smaller? Well, this is one of the pointers that I've been looking on social media. To be honest, I haven't really been getting involved in the conversation because this all goes over my head a little bit. Not that I don't understand it, it's just that it's not the final design, so it's a little bit premature, but what we have seen is we've seen Dan's and the comparisons with other stadiums. Now, there was pictures taken from the consultation in St Luke's that got leaked again, they got leaked those pictures online, even though we were told we would get to see those pictures to be unofficial, it was never made official. Now, they have been scaled down slightly, and that's been worrying people. Now, do you think those original pictures, the reason they've been scaled down is maybe those original pictures were for the larger stadium, maybe a 60,000, all-seater, right? I'm just throwing this out there, maybe they were for an all-seater 60,000 stadium, and maybe what's changed since then is that, now because of what they think with rail seating, and the fact that it looks like there could be a change in the legislation, do you think maybe what they've done is simple?  Possibly. Possibly. It's hard to know where the original scale is, when he done the... I didn't go to the presentation, so I don't know what people have reported, but I didn't hear with my own ears what Batman might have said about that situation, so he could come back and go, they were just examples of, you know, first-parts, orans, or first-parts, whatever, to give you some idea. I don't know. They could quite well be what you just said. Originally, they thought 60,000, can you build it, than a 60,000, and he did, and now, they've had a look at it, and they're looking at costumes, and they're looking at... Yeah, we can have 52,000, we'll be rail-seating, we can have 62,000, because that's what they've said, haven't they? Yeah, that's what they've said. That's what they've said. We're not making that up. Well, that's quite clear, out there, they want 62,000 capacity if rail-seating changes, so, and listen, I'm a firm believer that it will change very quickly, and everything will be able to go up to 50,000. We've seen things change all the time, Tottenham were having a cheese room, and now they're not having a cheese room, so... Well, we know Tottenham have got rail-seating in their stadium. Well, they've got the facility to put it in. Wolves put it in. Well, listen, let's just clear something up. You can have rail-seating right now in your stadium. You're just not allowed to have the seats bolted up. It's got to be permanently in the seating position, but if you want to put those seats in your stadium right now, there's nothing to stop you. It is Wolves are looking at this, but they're putting an area of this ground that doesn't house fans, if that makes sense. So they're not using it on a match day, but they're putting it into an area of the ground, and I don't know why, but it's to see. I think they're going to do some experimentation with it and maybe open it. But the idea is that you can put, though, and I spoke to John Darsh, a safe standing expert in the UK. We're going to speak to him next week about this. And he said, you can have those seats now. You just can't use them for standing. But some clubs are looking at it, instead of we put them in. Maybe, like in an away end, where you've got a problem with people standing up.  It's safer to have this kind of seating. But it is a seat. It's just that it's got that. We think that we're doing that with scaling it down, if that's what's happened. And we still don't know. People are just putting the two together. They could quite well before. They could be spot on. No, no. We've got no clue. It's because the concourses and stuff have got to be bigger if it's going to be rail seating quite clearly, because when the seats, it's 52, and when the not seats, it's a 62. Isn't this the problem or the whole thing is that we're guessing? Because at the end of the day, this is a leaked document that has got nothing behind it, other than what it says. And we've got context. And anything we've got to compare it to was also leaked. So you're right. There's no context to anything that we're talking about. We're just talking about leaked images. And we're trying to do our best with them. But they're there. They're genuine. The club, apparently, have launched an investigation to how they got leaked. So they are genuine. It's just not... These are just not the final plans. I think that's what we've got to get over to people. I just think that it could be some... You're right. It could be somewhere in that. It could be that while we're jostling for ideas internally at the club. They're coming out with all different things. What about this then? What about this as a scenario? And I don't know whether you think this could be a reason for it, but whether this negative that the club has seen could actually be turned into a positive as far as the club has concerned. By coming out now, it gives a lot of people the opportunity to throw the... Are you saying these might be they're being purposely leaked to get the atmosphere amongst the fans? I'm just asking the question. I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying now that they have been leaked could... Oh, the club should be using this as an opportunity to gauge public reaction because before the plan goes in and we know it can be changed up until literally half an hour before it's submitted, it gives people the opportunity... They only use a couple of pencils with a rubber on the end. Yeah, of course. You've got to have them. You've got to be ready to... You know, and that could be a way of testing the water. I personally think that when we kick off any more, that our capacity will be above 52,000. That's my personal view. Again, I don't know that because I just don't know. But what I'm going to say is that if these got out... Let's just say they have been leaked by someone at the club. I'm not saying they have been. I'm just saying if they have been, I think that would have been a clever strategy. I think the fact is that you can gauge ideas by listening. It's not listening. It wouldn't be the first time an institution has released something to gauge how the public feels. The government do it all the time. All the time. People do it. People do it in every walk of life all the time. They'll leak something. Then you've got plausible deniability and you can go, oh, no, no, that's not real. When it was the first ever plan or whatever, things that we do, people do it all the time for everything. It gives... You can then gauge the... The club, let's be honest, the club can be looking around. They can be looking around. What we talk about, what other sites talk about polls, people they feel have a vested interest online, whatever, and gonna go, oh, they don't. Funny enough, we've got something on our Twitter page today about the badge. It's just five years since the badge or something was gonna get changed. Right? So, it's like that again. People, they looked online, seeing the fans hated. There was a... There was a... thing you all done. Petition done. And the club scene, that fans didn't like it. And then they said to the fans, well, what do you like? Went away, got it, made the badge. Now, okay, you can't do that with a stadium. Of course you can't. But by just seeing, by looking online and talking to people, you can gauge what works and what doesn't work, and then you can use that in the final plans. Of course you can. What do you think people's biggest issue with this? I mean, I think there's two problems with it in terms of for some people. I think it's the wording of what the club has said. It's an iconic stadium on the banks of the Royal Blue Maisie. Right? So by making it smaller on those designs from what was on the other designs, people are instantly gonna say the doom munga's out there. Or just people who want to see Evan be the biggest thing in the world or whatever are gonna go, why is that one bigger? Why is this one smaller? Because if it's going that way, then how much more will it go that way? So instead of going, so really it should be going that way and going, well, if you're listening to us, it shouldn't be 50, it should be 60. But it's not it, people will look at it and go, there's only 52. You're saying it might get to 62. And it's getting smaller. So how much more will it go smaller? And that's, I think that's the problem, isn't it? That's the real problem that people are gonna come up with. The other one is, I suppose from this pit is how it looks.  Whereas that's a big problem with that is that's not gonna look like that. Like I'm 99.9 short that it won in a thousand that it will not look like that. Because that goes against, that's not just a creative. I thought that's an actual getting it through planning permission. That's going to, you've got to go to, you know, the world heritage people who clearly don't want this thing in the first place and say to them, this is not gonna mess with the waterfront. This is not gonna ruin the front of it. Maybe if you didn't have world heritage or whatever, then you could go, we're gonna put this big glass thing on the front and it's gonna be amazing. But number one, why would you do that anyway? Why wouldn't you want to have something iconic that fits without it being an ISO? I want it to look like the surrounding area and make it fit and make it look. Do you not think it, if it stayed a 52, we're all not happy with 52,000? I'm not happy with 52,000. I'm not asked. If it gets to 62, yeah. No, no, no. That said, yeah, sorry. My point is, I've got no problem with the shape standard and it's taking it up. Really, I think it's clever. I really do. I'm not happy if it stays a 52,000. No, no, no. I'm really not. That to me is too low. But I still think, even if it was 52,000 to start with whatever, I still think it can be iconic. Of course it can. Because Yventus holds 43 and looks iconic. Can I ask you a question? Yeah. Can I ask you a question though? And I think this is, I think this is something that hasn't really been spoke about as such is. Right. Is it iconic because of what it looks like or is it iconic because of where it is? Right. Because we, what if someone said to, what if they had the two on the, you've got the two places, Bramley Mordoch East Lanks. Right. What if someone had said to you, we can, to that land, there's a lot of land, there's nothing stopping us from doing whatever we want. Literally, and we can surround it by a big ever theme park if we wish. It doesn't matter. No one's stopping us. We can do whatever we want. That's ours. And then you've got Bramley Mordoch, confined area, smaller footprint, less room to work on, a river on one side, a road on the other side, waking docks, a sewage plant, waking docks on this side. Right. You can find to what you've got there. So, what if they tell you, man, we just can't make it any bigger. So, there's your church.  Everton Land, like, Disney World. We can have whatever you want. Or do you want something that is in the most iconic spot. It's going to look amazing. It's going to look, when you come down the river, night shots of it from planes and drones, and are going to look amazing. Isn't that the trade-off that we've all sort of signed up for here? Because I don't remember that many people saying, it's got to be the ranks. Every single person I spoke to wanted Bramley Mordoch because he was iconic. It was something that was going to separate us from the rest. It was going to put us in a place that was going to be, it was going to be right near town and was going to just, going to, going to elevate us from being one thing, maybe to another thing. Instead of having an out- almost like an out-of-town experience. Once again, put on our Twitter 65,000 plus East Slanks Road, 52,000 plus Bramley Mordoch, poll, just see what people go for. You're absolutely right with that because at the time we were giving Stone Cross Bridge whatever it was called. That was one of the sites. If we'd have gone for that, there'd be bricks and mortar coming out the ground now because it was planning permission with the sale through. We could have built whatever. We could have built 70,000 stadiums. Could have what we wanted. Right. Or Bramley Mordoch. Now personally, 70,000 on the East Slanks of 55,000 I'm going to go for because that's not pushing the envelope too much on Bramley Mordoch. I take Bramley Mordoch every time. Every time. Every time. And that's about 15,000 less than what you could have had in East Slanks because it's for all of those reasons you've said with our own entity and Bramley Mordoch, we're not. We haven't got the other noisy neighbors in our vicinity. We're in the heart of the city. We're on the waterfront. We're surrounded by that fantastic architect. We're helping regenerate the part of Liverpool. We're going to, we're going to, you know, town is stretching. Oh, I said, I walked last week. I told you this. I got a train to Moorfields from here. Right. And I walked literally to where the new ground is to pick my car up. And it, I was on my own at seven o'clock at night. And honest to God, it was a nice little walk. It, I cut through the back of Old All Street. I was going, you know, nice buildings around me, nice sort of environment. And then I cut, cut down on two great Howard Street. Um, and I never once felt like on my own or, and you imagine that on a match day with more fans around you, with more things there, as, as, as you just said, as town pushes outwards. And I was tense. And there's nice, and there's nice bars and there's places to go for a drink. So that's where, so that's where I, and I think a lot of other I think would, would have chosen that. If they would have come out at the very, the very start of this, right? And gone, right? We're moving from Goddison because we have to. And your two options are 65,000 plus on the East Lanks or 55,000 on the banks of the Royal Blue Maze at Bramley Mordor.  What do you think? I think people would have gone for the 55,000. That's what we'd went for, wasn't it? As a fan base, that's what we went for. And we got all excited when we were, when we were going to get that pail and never sign that over to who owns the lamp pail. I thought it was the council and we, we pushed and we pushed and we pushed and we pushed and I think people forget all this.  No, this is what we wanted as a fan base. Let's remember that. For me, if the club is really wanted, wanted to go its way, it'd be so much easier. Cheaper. Cheaper. And you, and you know what happens then is, for me, what Brownie Moore will do, it actually, it concentrates the thinking. It makes it a tougher design. So that damn mice has to start thinking, how do I do this? How can I make this? I think that number one is amazing because it's got to be amazing because of what surrounds it. Because like, because it is Liverpool. Because it can't, it could just be whatever on this one.  I just think, I think, I think the problem, I think from a positive point of view, being where it's going to be, is that surrounding area, it is that, you're buying into that area, right? I think it's going to attract more people and there's no football. Because it's in the city centre, it's on, you come down a cruise like, oh, there's more staff for these days, we do it. You go to a city, you want to go and see the, where there's, are people going to get off a, I know, look at, look at Bill's, Bill's house. It's not going to matter to some people, right, but, you get off a boat on the pier head, you're not going to go, what was that? Take me to the East Lanks, to look for evidence. They've been to the East Lanks.  Look at somewhere like Bill Bow, right, Bill Bow Stadium is amazing, the way they've done it, right. My mum, dad went on a cruise ship, they went to, and they, and they went past it, and my dad was like, oh, there it is, let's go. I had a little look, I've got a little pen, and it's like, that's amazing. It looks amazing. I'm not saying, I mean, the club itself is not, I mean, it's not a massive world brand, but it doesn't want to be only pick local players, but that stadium is, I read it a piece out last week, to move to that stadium. It meant something because, if you read up on it, on Bill Bow, they are the Basque team, they only take players from the, who are brought up in the Basque country or born in the Basque world.  So that ground, it means the world to them, and how they built their ground was amazing. They basically built, like Tottenham's, but they built it, and then, played the final game, and they knocked it down, they quickened it, and then built the stadium, and it's an amazing, and it's a bit like, well, hopefully, I'm hoping, the brand most people look like, this iconic thing that you look at, look at from the river. It's slightly different because it's slightly higher up, but it's an amazing, but it's that kind of feel that we're looking for, something that just, you look at it, stand back and go, wow, wow, look at that. Do you think the club could have, it's so fun, do you think the, I'll ask you a question, do you think the club should recognise this, and say to people, what do you think, or do you think they should stay well clear of this? That was going to be my question to you. I was going to say it's a tough one, because if they're trying to do things, but this is not for the public, that was it. No, but I'm saying to you, if they're trying to do things, in a way, building up to planning, I don't know, the consultation's been planned for May or June, which incorporates images and all that. Now, as far as the reporter last week, this isn't going to be the document we see anyway, so we're going to see stuff that, stuff that we like and we can vote on, something like the damn mice are going to put like, homeless cats.  But do you think the club should have come out and done an official statement then, not fed it to the echo? Come on, go. Well, hang on, they fed it to us, let's be honest with them. I know, I know, but they're going to feed it to people, but do you think the club should come out and say, listen, this isn't this? Well, they did, but that's what they did. They got in touch with people like us. No, no, but I'm saying, that's what they did. They did that, they did it the way they do everything else. They got in touch with us and said, put it out, you know, make sure that it's, you know, it is the real thing, but it's not from us. But I know what you're saying, should they've done it in official, they should've thrown it up now and say, look, our plans are still to be bigger than $52,000, because I think people, I think people are looking, right. People are looking. Can I, people have, hang on, people have messaged me today saying about it and stuff and going, what I don't like, is the fact that it was bigger and it seemed to be in scale. Can they, could the club not head that off and go? What are we missing here? What are we missing? We're missing quite a few things. But what are we missing in terms of, what are we missing in terms of communication? A chief engagement officer. We're missing somebody. A chief engagement officer. That badge thing. We're missing somebody. Maybe not even that. We're missing somebody who could have come out and said to us, that's not, that's not, that's not accurate. Accurate, whatever. That's something, that's an internal document that is used to do these things. Someone that the fans trust. No specifics, are we? No, but that's what the club are missing, are we? The club should have come out. But they don't have a human being at the club, we can do that. They don't have someone at the club whose job it is. And, all right, we're crossing, crossing into something else now. But the club don't have someone who can come out and talk to fans and go, not last week, you sent me that thing from Tony Barrett, where he got into it with like Liam Gallagher and everybody. And people go, that's dead unprofessional. I don't think it's brilliant. I love it. I love everything that Tony Barrett does for Liverpool because I think it's brilliant. He talks, but it's not professional. But what it is, you'd say that because it's Liverpool, because it's Liverpool. If that wasn't it, if that wasn't it. I just didn't. I didn't see his point of, and he's still checking, or now using 9th or something, whatever it was. But the point is, he was fighting. He does it all the time. He is the, he is the fan's representative at the football club officially. And he was just putting it out there. No, he was putting it out there there as himself. But what I'm saying is though, he is somebody that you can talk to at Liverpool and then can run laid up because that's his job. And that's something we don't, we need to live at the football club and be sitting there for ages. We had one. We had the best one. He's gone. We need another one back. We need someone that can come out on Friday night and go, like that, relay the things that the club are trying to relate to, like the echo and trying to relate to us. Why doesn't someone have, why haven't they got someone at the club who can do that? Do you know what? How hard would it be? Honestly, how hard would it be to have someone who works for the club just pick up a phone and go, right, right, everybody. I believe there's a document going around Twitter. Blah, blah, blah. Yeah, that's for this, whatever.  Why do you need to go through all the, it doesn't have to have production value, it doesn't need to be official video. Why aren't the club brave enough to now just go, 2019, why can't you just pick up a phone, make a video message and just stick it out? Because they haven't got a chief engage. But that's what I'm saying. Why does everything have to go around the house? We live on them, we live now in a generation of everything where it's just like, why am I waiting for the news tomorrow? I can find out today. I just think, you're right, but if we had that chief engagement officer who could front her up, it could be, it still wouldn't have satisfied some people, you've got access to, but at least the club have had it, they're off, at least they've looked and gone, look, however they do it, right. This isn't, this is a document that's being prepared as you do, it's still a work in progress as it will continue to be up until we submit plan and permission. Why exactly? Listen, we went into a thing last week for the stadium, right? Find out the results of the public consultation, right? So all the media there and, the echo and all that are there, and it's like, when's it gonna be the echo tomorrow morning because that's the next print? We had it out 10 minutes later. We had it out now 10 or 10 minutes later. I'm not saying that makes us better, but the echo obviously or any newspapers, they, that's their, that's their, that's their form, that's their form of meaning, that's how they make money, you do go on their website, but I know it's changed them, of course it's changed them, it's changed them so they can get stuff out instantly, but that's the way we live in now, people want stuff instantly, it shouldn't be for the next day, it should be instantly, the club should have someone who works there, who has got the remit to just go, we need this out and we need this out now, I'm gonna pick them, how hard would it be for somebody to work on everything for both clubs, to have an office in their house where they have a phone and a tripod and have a light, where they can just sit down and have an official board behind them and just go, I'm sure everyone's just, I'm sure everyone out there is just seeing this document, that document is not for public consumption, this is what it is, please don't think that this is the final, these are the final designs because they're not, bang, get on Twitter, get on Facebook, get on Instagram, it's out, it's everywhere, it's just told you everything you need to know instantly, this is something the club are missing massively, why do you need the echo, why do you need us, you do it, we have a conversation about that anyway, but almost like if it comes from us, it almost feels like it's, are these real, are these not real, we're just saying, this is what it is, this is what it looks like, it generates speculation, that runs away, and then the narrative changes, so people are saying, oh, that's that, and that's that, and it's like, how do you know that, how do you know that's the design, but how do you know that's not the design? We were given the other ones in the first place though, after we were told, we would have been. But when moving away, aren't we from what the actual thing is? No, I know, but I think it's important though, I think it's important to talk about these things though, Baz, I think it's important to ask, why are we here, discussing leaked images of pictures that may or may not be the stadium, when the club, Do you know what the point of what it is, to make videos and stuff like that? I know, we would have talked about it anyway, of course we would have, it doesn't matter whether it's over, no, no, but the point being is, if everything would have come out, and just gone, well we'd have had context to it, exactly, and then you can talk about the context, so it's not, it doesn't harm us, but what I'm saying is, as a football club, you could have, you have someone who just fronted up on Friday night, whose job it is, and just says, these are not the real images, or goes on Twitter and says, nothing has come out from the club, good, bad, whatever, it's all from other sources, and then it's whether people even source those sources, people might be sitting there all watching this and going, you know, not, because we're not credible to them, and that's fine, if we're not credible to someone, but the point being is, then it'd be a lot easier to do this video, if we knew, because officially, it's like when you go, we might be saying, I'll wait till I see him in an evidence sheet, and it's like, honestly, no, no, and that's fine, because people have been stung far too many times, and I just think that could easily solve this kind of issue. But that's the big major, the whole thing could be with the chief engagement officer. If you've got someone, whether it was Alan Myers or someone who understands more of it behind, you know, whatever, if you've got that person who fronts it all up, even if being, you know, yet he means being abducted by aliens, people who'd run in the other day, which was basically, that was what it was, you know, the conspiracy, no one's seen him. Someone's come, yet he means being, he's been into this training, and that's it, oh, well that's gone. But all right then, what next?  You know, we don't, we add a presentation from Fanatics, we know how big they, we don't know anything, but, you know, things like that, just someone who heads things off to keep the club moving in the right direction. A lot of people, the thing with Bramley more, what I read from a lot of different people is, no one's really happy with the capacity, right? And that's, someone like, you know what, I'm all right with it, that's fine, I'm okay with it. If it does what it says, if it does what it says, meaning, let me ask you a question right now. Right now. Come on. If Everton Football Club came on today and said we can give you 62,000 seats, right now, right? Or the alternatives, 52,000 seats with a possibility of 10 standing, which one would you take? 62,000 seats. Which I would take 52,000 with a possibility of standing. As, as, no possibility is, no, they're all nailed down, there's no way to go. Oh, okay. Um, know what you know, but you're gambling. What are you gambling though? I don't know. See, isn't that the same, isn't that the same question as Big Shiny, Evertonland and Bosch looking stadium, where you might have a slightly reduced stadium? But what I'm, what I'm trying to say is that people, I, I really do believe because there's too much stuff going on in the background that the once upon ratio will be gone soon. It'll be bigger. Okay. Right. And that means evidence capacity will be bigger. I've never ever thought. You're not willing to bet that on 52. Will you just give me 62? So that's the higher capacity. Yeah. But I want the higher capacity. But I want the, I want, I want that. Do you want the high capacity with standing? Yeah, of course I want standing because I think with standing comes atmosphere and, and that's the way football's going, hopefully football's going anyway. And I, yeah, yeah, but I just wanted to get to 62,000, it's that, that, I think that's a lot of people's biggest gripe is obviously the capacity size. Right. Go. Isn't it? Quite clearly. Oh, no, no. So, everything could come out meant we know that by next year the ratios one to two. Right. Yeah. One point. So, therefore our capacity, we can guarantee you our capacity is going to be 62,000 whenever and kickoff in 2022. Yeah. Like I was saying, is that everybody seems to want the easy option. Right. But the easy option was going to KB or the easy option was going to Lanks. Yeah, yeah. Just building a big ball that you can just throw 70,000. But the Lanks was the one. Because that's the real thing. What we're doing at Bramley Mordor is really, really difficult. We are, we are, and don't think for a minute that I am being like a, like, you know, a bespoke sort of something here. Just think of the practicalities of building on what it is now. It's a dock. It's still a dock. It's right next to a river. It's not, it's got a big wall that is not, you don't have to knock it down, really. The practicalities of where we're building are not easy. And we're saying we're going to build a state-of-the-art stadium that's not going to look like anywhere else in this little thing. It's not easy. And yet people are trying to say, why aren't you doing this? Why aren't you making it steep? What if they, what if every time they go make a design, someone goes, you can't do that because that thing there will block this thing here and you're hitting the wall or you're overhangs going over the river. You know what I mean? Like actual practicalities of the footprint that we've asked for because it's iconic. It's surely, it's a little bit give and it's a little bit, of course it is. The problem is we don't know what the give and take are because we're all in the dark, aren't we? That's the issue. Realistically, that's the key. Yeah. The key issue is we've been given no information. Yeah. No one's given context to anything. That's why we've done a presentation a year ago. That we were told almost a year ago. Where's that? That the images we were told were this and this is what I've come back to what I was saying before. We're all in the dark as fans.  Of course we are. And what do we always say? We always say when there's loads of when it's silence, people fill in narrative and everything. They're getting better at some stuff. They still aren't laying and other stuff on that. That is what will undo everything ultimately as we go forward. We won't have confidence in what you're doing. It's not even if you think that you are going to build this stadium. But have confidence in it then because the more you know last week when we were at the fanatics presentation. For me, that was the first time I've had a real ever official talk with conviction about us having brandy more dock. It really was. When Sasha was going we're building this iconic shop and brandy more docked when we get to the stadium. But other times it's all been it's been it's problems and it's difficult to get in it. I'm not talking about people we might speak to who we're going now I'm talking about official people who speak some he's on the board he's a board member telling us when we're getting to the stadium and this deal with fanatics because they're going to build this brilliant big shop flagship store at our new stadium and brandy more come out and be bullish with the gold we're going there we know we're going there and these are like you said we're going to be juggling a little bit to get it through brandy. Have confidence Juggleday Stadium through plan and permission. We've had spares fans sending me stuff going look when we put in for it we said we were only having 50,000 54,000 the minute it got passed it went to 62 because we went oh we can alter that we're going to see once the plan and permission is in place it's in place everything should be I know they're not going to come out and go we've got a builder like this to get it through plan and they don't need to say that but they have to be a little bit braver of fill the narrative now tell people the direction we're going in tell people the timeline if there's real issues with scaling and I don't know whether there is but it's been come out and say we might have had to take the things a little bit since Dan Mises presentation we have to accept it he can still we could still end up with say 55,000 say we'll just brush it as John B would say but 55,000 stadium that looks absolutely incredible from the outside it's amazing inside it's it's difficult to make it look amazing inside it will look brilliant I've said it before Bas I've said it before I'd rather have 55,000 Evertonians with a boss atmosphere than 65 and you're losing something what did you think about the the wall laying it'll never happen no it would never happen it's one of those things that is probably putting so some people go when people look and go what's going to happen and stuff because that's really important to us we'll go oh yeah we'll build the wall on the ground at the last minute with someone I'll go safety people go you can't have that why well a player could hit it or fans could fall over it you can't have it and the club will go oh yeah we can't have it sorry everybody but you've already they look mad though you already tick that box for the for the whoever needs that need that to be how can I say this they've got to be nice to loads of people they've got to overpromise to some people but those are the people that make the decisions but they're not they're not us you've got to think of like world heritage you know that like that's a that's a major thing I've been this you know I'm going but I've been listening to this week world heritage you're apparently want to want to do more in the city and some people are like don't let them don't let them go anywhere else because it's all like saying because they want to go into Chinatown and places like that and people are like no don't let them go anywhere else because as soon as because there's places in Liverpool and people might think this is a good thing or a bad thing but there's places in Liverpool that haven't that the city needs to needs to regenerate whether you like that or not student housing the point being students bring millions of pounds that's been ripped apart by you know who having that would stop that so it's not always a good thing some people just want to get rid of the world heritage it's like it opens the world heritage travel catalog girls let's go there they've got world heritage it's like literally nobody I don't give a touch about it because it wouldn't stop me going somewhere I wouldn't open a thing you're like you're just sharing your I'm going because of world heritage I'm going I'd open it and go into a beer it could have been anywhere but you know no one's not if we lost world heritage UNESCO thing do you honestly believe people wouldn't come to Liverpool there's one less certificate in Joe's office he wouldn't give a touch they'd still be here but they had a hoops they've got a jump through they've got a jump through all these hoops and make sure that when they get these kind of documents everything looks okay boss might not always be the documents that I think the important thing out of this is we all have to take a step back probably and just go we can have this properly when the consultation comes out it's only going to be another couple of months now give or take three months and we're going to have the images that we're going to have the misstep evident made as a club was three months ago was it three months ago or four months ago when they brought and they didn't tell people why we were where we were because really we should have been ready to go then we were told we were told we were going to have planning permission at the end of last year and now you're telling us it's the end of this year and the fact that they never told us why let all the do merchants in now listen some of those do merchants I know and I surround people and they've got every writer to be like that because they've seen this stuff before and a lot of them have been right because they're ever thrown that's what I'm saying I'm not having a go at it the point being is we've been down this road before and if you don't tell people why you're making decisions they can't don't know they can't get behind the next decision if you haven't explained one decision why didn't you get behind the next decision so that's that's the top and bottom of it and that again it all comes back to all now it was not where it should have been tell everyone tell everyone throw them under the bus they probably wouldn't though because it's a professional integrity but what they could say is we've changed we've changed we've changed their track and we're now doing this we've been far along as we should have been and now we get a whole new board some of the people on the board don't agree with the old regime therefore things are going to change but they didn't you didn't say anything and therefore and like we just said the narrative gets filled by all the people then so number one go and get some on do the job and come out public and be a public spokesman for this stadium because don't leave it in the hands of third parties like us and like the Echo and Roger Phillips is falling for God's sake get somebody who can come on this couch get somebody who can go to the Echo get somebody who can go into the Radio City can go on Radio Media can go on Sky and confidently get across what is going on not just about the stadium but anything to do with evidence and I'll ask you about those will be will be won right there you will be shutting down the debate straight away on the ways and the whys and the whos and whatever so anyway let us know your thoughts anyway let us know your thoughts importantly on if you'd been offered the two which we were essentially would you would you be going towards you know croquis now would you give the context would Eddentland give the context to that you know 65,000 plus a croc stuth or 50 personally say 55,000 at the King's Dock at Brandy Moe Dock which one would you personally I'd be I'm right on board what we're doing now because I think in the end the hard way is the best way well I've seen it I've seen a Liverpool fan do the dice rain you know an old day getting the stadium on the waterfront and they're going to be part of town and you know it's iconic and all that and we're all's we're doing is getting Bon Jovi they're getting Bon Jovi back all's we're doing is bolting on to their original stadium how did this how did we allow this as a club to happen that was from a Liverpool fan so that you can see that can I just just one more thing I've looked in the comments and some people are still asking the question why do we need to move that's people's no I don't but the reason we have to move is because our stadium doesn't make any money and we'll get older and what are you going to do with it older stadium it'll get older and there's no and we can't bolt on don't forget we can bolt on Liverpool can we can't do nothing more with we'll go to some park apart from the parking like before we go Jo put the show already this is very early in the infancy now about 500 votes okay 500 votes in 91% barely more there you go 500 votes in probably more still but people have got to get away from the people out there who come on go to some park go to some park will continue to get older and older and older and there's nothing you can do with it and as the game more money comes into it how do you don't forget FFP which you talk about all the time it's making money yourself to balance the books we can't do that with go to some park we just can't it doesn't we can't when people say why don't you spend you can't you can't spend it on place because you need to generate that money in the first place to spend to be able to pay their wages but if you've got a if you've got a higher turnover then you can bring those people in that's how FFP works and it's not going away in the way it is at the moment it's staying very much the way it is so we've got to move and we can't and we'd love to be able to build on good and I feel good and I feel good because we want to be self-sustainable all might be can't be lying far out of the sherry or all the shittles money or anyone we want to be self-sustainable and we can only do that with the biggest savings that's it there you go thanks for watching let us know your thoughts in the comments make sure you to get on the poll on Twitter see you later


So this is something I think we're going to keep seeing more and more of in the future and that's government fines over data breaches. Now this one has a little bit of a twist to it because you know right away people face palm and go yeah the company had bad security they didn't do this right. Well kind of but I want to be very clear on how this happened as much as we know about it. So the US Energy firm was fined $2.7 million. Now they took the name out and they omitted it but that's not really the relevant to me of this article anyways. What's really revenue is how the hack occurred or not really a hack it's just a data breach that didn't turn into a hack that we know of but the records for people's personal data was exposed that's the key in this that caused the fine. So the fine occurred and the incident which has been assigned to risk rating mysterious involved a third party contractor to improperly copy data from the energy firm own network despite receiving training the contractor failed to comply with the company's information production program and I want to read a little bit more into that. So here is the actual public notice from NERC the North American Electronic Reliability Corporation who find the power company that's name is undisclosed and here is the deep in there I'll leave links to this. You already received a report of an online data exposure with the possibility associated with URE. The report came from a White Hat security researcher not associated with URE. URE is the name they gave the company to keep them anonymous. A third party URE contractor exceeded author's access by improperly copying certain UAE data from URE's network environment to the contractor's network environment where it was no longer subject to URE's visibility or controls. The contractor failed to comply with URE's information protection program on which it was trained while the data on the contractor's network a subset of live URE data was accessible online without the need to enter user ID password and it goes into what was included in the data but what I want to be very clear this is the twist so to speak of why this matters a lot. This is a regulatory organization that realizes that it was not that company's fault it was the contractor's fault but please note who paid the fine. The fine was paid by the power company. Now this is something we're going to see a lot of so you really have to think about your contractors that you bring into your company and I know some places like locally here the hospitals have moved to zero contractors they only use internal staff and I think we're going to see some trends like this where companies maybe as the fines roll out get more careful about who they hire because they can't just say well the contractor did it because the Energy Commission here the public company that fined them absolutely noted that it was Cospac contractor please note who's not being fined the contractor I'm sure there's other legal ramifications going there but if they just hired some inexpensive database guy who copied it to his home server whatever we don't know the details what happened we know I don't know that that's what happened but I want to think about that if that type of incident occurs you as the business owner are responsible ultimately and I think this is something that's being made very clear over and over again and we're going to see a lot more incidents like this so you are responsible for the contractors you choose if those contractors grew up and accidentally do something bad with your data even though you told them hey don't take this out of our network they take it out of the network you're responsible this drives me nuts because I see so many companies look for the lowest cheapest thing they can use for software I see a lot of IT companies that don't really think a lot about that they just like always use this tool or that tool because I get a better deal on it but ultimately you as the business owner you really have to think about that that is a big issue and we're seeing this or spend some hospitals have had incidents as well and the same thing the hospital pays the fine even though the contractor did it like I said you can go after them that but if you hired some inexpensive database guy do they have the you know where with all to know how to handle things properly will you be able to extract any money out of them are they a big enough firm that you could then take the 2.7 million that you're fine love illegal action against them going hey you're the one that screwed up and they go great take my 1996 Toyota that I drove here and you know can they even cover it I don't know but that's just something the big picture that I want people to really take home and think about is the contractors you hire are your ultimate responsible for this has always been clear in other markets you know if you're a home builder and you hire a really bad plumber the homeowner doesn't chase the plumber they chase you if you were the general contractor for doing it that's why general contractors vet and care a lot about their reputation because they hire the right people that's you know the granted there's always incidents but that's how the other business work this is the same way but it's also a different scale because people look at technology differently um they go I just need this little thing fixed can I just hire this guy I found on something you know some place to contract work you're giving him access to all your critical data and this worries me too because some IT companies outsource to third-party help desk and that means you're letting a third-party help desk remote into your computer what if that guy says you know what I can make my money I can take all the stuff on your computer and copy it that scares me a lot when people say why aren't you using overseas help desk I'm like because we keep it all internal so I have some you know control over these things so anyways that's just some food for thought and my thoughts on this topic but I want people to think a little bit deeper about it and make sure you hire contractors who I can follow processes and you don't have to worry about and they're not just you know screwing up and not following all this and get you fine 2.7 million thanks feel like to catch in here like and subscribe you have some thoughts on this leave me in the comments


Rivers are dynamic and powerful and can sometimes escape their banks. Flooding can be caused from ice jams like the one seen behind me. Ice jams can occur at either river freeze up or breakup, but the more common time is at breakup. Extended periods of cold temperatures form thick ice on the river. Warm temperatures then melt snow, which raises river levels and creates a recipe for ice jams. There are three stages of the breakup process. Pre-breakup begins with warm temperatures and increased river flow. The ice breaks into chunks and separates from the bank. Breakup involves ice moving downstream. This ice hangs up on stationary ice or objects like bridges. Smaller jams move downstream to create a large jam. Once the ice jams, it could dam the river and cause rapid severe flooding. The last stage is the final drive where the large jam dislodges, takes out smaller jams and clears the river of ice. This can cause flooding downstream. North flowing rivers tend to ice jam more often because southern portions thaw faster and ice hangs up as it moves north. Ice jam floods are especially dramatic because of the potential for quick rises in river level, quick water release and large ice remnants on the bank. Rivers go through cycles of destruction and healing. As temperatures rise, ice chunks will melt, new plants will emerge and stabilize the soil to prepare for future floods. From the University of Wyoming Extension, I'm Mae Smith, Exploring the Nature of Wyoming.


We're going to start the pre-recorded talk, which is entitled Cloud Native Application with Daypair and OpenShift by Yip Sa. Hello everybody. Welcome to DevCon 2020. We will talk about the Cloud Native application with DAPR, DAPR. What exactly is DAPR? DAPR is the Microsoft Latest Open Source Project. It is an event-driven portable one-time for building distributed microservices for stateless and stateful application on the Cloud and also on the Edge. It employs the diversity of languages and development framework. It supports many programming languages and it's a natural fit for Kubernetes and OpenShift. In the DAPR framework, we have the DAPR concept. DAPR concept contains two fundamental concepts, building blocks. The building blocks implement distributed system capability. They include, for example, publication and subscription, day management, resource binding, and distributed tracing. Components encapsulate the implementation of a building block API so that would include staff, Postgres SQL, MySQL, Raiders, MongoDB. Many of the components are also plugable so that the implementation can be swapped out and swapped in. Inside a building block, you have a building block API. It exposes a public API that you can call from your code using the component to implement the building block capability. Each building block has multiple components, as you see from the architecture diagram here. DAPR have the following building block components that were built in. For example, surface-to-surface invocation, day management, publish and subscribe, resource binding and trigger, actor, observability, and secret. These are all built-in building blocks and you could also do your own customization building blocks, depends on what you need. The DAPR architecture, you can see at the application code at the top, you could support any type of framework. You could have a Golang or Node.js, iPhone, Java, Ruby, C-Sharp. Those are all different type of application code that is supported. Then you talk to the middle tier DAPR using some sort of HTTP API or GRPC API. And then you talk interact with all these different components in DAPR. And then DAPR will talk to the lower layer on the cloud services using AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft, and so on. The component basically is a functionality deliver as a component. Each component has an interface definition. All of these different components are plug-inable so we can swap them in and swap them out easily. The component type, so we have seen earlier, we have surfacing location, resource binding, state management, distributed tracing, push and subscribe, and act. So DAPR is an open shift. So what you need to do is to set up the different ports using DAPRs and each port contain a DAPR container, right? So for example, you have a DAPR actor on one port and then you have a DAPR sci-card injector in one port, data operator in one port, all these different DAPR ports interact with the DAPR sci-card. So DAPR also have an API that supports HTHP or GLPC that talk to your application code, right? So all these got encapsulated into open shift on the left side and that could interact with other component on the right-hand side, right? Using the resource binding, the state or store, the push and subscribe and the distributed tracing. So in order to use DAPR in open shift, first we would install ham, right? So download your latest ham from github.com and unpack your ham and then find the ham binary and move it into the user local bin ham. And once you have installed ham, you can go ahead and install Docker using the yum install Docker, then you could use the system control to start the Docker service. At this time, you are available to install DAPR. You can use the wget.dashq and get the DAPR, get the installation script from github. So once you get the shell script, you need to log into your open shift cluster as an administrator. Make sure that you check your login status with the OC who am I and you should be an admin administrator for your cluster. So since we are using ham repository to install DAPR, you need to add the DAPR URL into the ham repository. Using the ham repo, add DAPR and pass in the URL, you could add the ham repository. And then next step, you need to do a ham repo update, making sure that you get the latest code. So now you have DAPR and ham and Docker in store. You can go ahead and create a namespace in open shift. So in this case, you can use OC create namespace. I'm giving it a name called DAPR system. Once you have your namespace, you can start installing DAPR into the namespace using ham install DAPR and then pass in your namespace name DAPR system. So that would install the namespace for you. So once the DAPR is installed, double check and make sure that you have the DAPR operator, DAPR side card injector, the DAPR basement and the DAPR sentry. So these four objects should be available as four different parts in your DAPR system namespace. So the DAPR operator managed the component and service services endpoint for DAPR, right? So that's pretty clear. The DAPR in side card injector injects DAPR into your ports. The DAPR placement used for actor, where it create a mapping table that map actor instance to port. And then the DAPR sentry managed the transportation layer security, basically as a act as a certificate authority. Now you can check your port status and make sure that they are in the running state. So when you call OC get port, passing the namespace DAPR system, you should see the four different part of running. So in the sample code, we're gonna demo how to get the DAPR running in OpenShift and then deploy the Node.js app. Let's subscribe to the other message and persistent. So in this diagram here, we have the DAPR one time that talk to the Node code using the DAPR API. We are using the state management, using the state store, including some databases such as Redis. So on the left side, we have the user that were interacting with this application using a get and post endpoint. So the get endpoint will get the list of orders. The post endpoint will be creating a new order. So in this Python app, we generate messages to the Node app, consume and persist them. So this architecture diagram will show you the DAPR component. So the DAPR one time will talk to the Python code. And then, so you have one DAPR and then you have another DAPR one time that talk to the Node code. So these two DAPR one time talk to each other. And then at the end, the DAPR one time will talk to the state store with the Redis. So first get the latest code from DAPR. This is a Hello World project. If you go to github.com, DAPR, sample.gip, then you see the into the sample Hello World folder, you should be able to see the project. The sample code has a dependency on Redis as a state store for data persistency. So therefore you need to install Redis. So the new order post endpoint. So when we need to create a new order, right? So we call app.pose and basically passing new order as a endpoint API. So you have the request and response object. So in this sample code here, right? It would create, it would call Redis state store to persist the order information. And then the get endpoint is similarly, you can call app.get and slash order and then passing the request that contain the order ID. So in this case, it will call the Redis state store and we shift the latest order information. So now you know we need the dependency on Redis. To install Redis, you can call him repo-ag. And using chart.binami.com, you can install that, you can add that repository. And then after that, you can call him install Redis and install Redis into your namespace. Redis also have a dependency on the secret. So extract the secret from the default namespace for Redis. So you use the OC get secret, specify the namespace, specify the JSON path using data.redis password. Once you get the password, you can update the Redis MO file in the deploy directory and update the Redis host to use the Redis master 6379 and then the password from the last step. Now you have the Redis YAML file updated. You can call ocrpy-f on the YAML file and make sure that the component get created. Now you can create the null and Python application using ocrpy-f, you can create a null YAML and then ocrpy-f, create a Python YAML. So at this time, you can do our oc get pod on the DAPR system. You can see that the DAPR operator, DAPR placement, the sentry, the DAPR side card, null app, Python app, Redis were all set up and running. So observe that the message, you can look at the message and by looking at the logs and coming out from the pod. So all you need you to do is to do our oc log with the null app pod name and then making sure that you got the other ID coming out from the logs. And then at the end, you can expose the wow from the null app. So you can do oc expose surface null app. You can call the null app endpoint and confirm that the other ID is being persist. In this case, our other ID 42. So now you have just finished the deployment of a DAPR app. You can go ahead and update a sample code and fit a scenario, right? So in conclusion, DAPR work well with cloud native OpenShift, enable EC, event driven, state for microservices deployment and development. DAPR provide consistent and portability using standard API, including HTTP and GRPC. This architecture is also open source and work well with any programming languages and development framework. That's it, the end of the presentation. Please let me know if you have any question. Thank you. Hi, so let me check again to see if Yip is here. If you're listening, Yip. If you're here, Yip, we need to have you try to share your audio and video. Okay, so I guess Yip is not here for the Q and A. You can try and follow up with him in person or you can also try going to the breakout booth later on. He may be there, people who wanna have discussions about things that happened in evolving technology. The breakout booth is the place to do it. It's the new edition room and I'll put that link in chat for anybody who wants to go there.


I've been on assignment every year that I've been at school for the Boston Marathon, so for three years, and being able to work and shoot in a city that's so alive. Everyone is out celebrating, having a good time, relaxing, and the city's really alive. So to be able to work in it, you see so many different things, you talk to so many different people, and it's amazing.


Today, I have the pleasure of speaking with Jamie McIntosh from GTA Resources. How are you today? Great. Thank you. Of course, Jamie, I apologize, but not everybody at Investor Intel knows who GTA Resources and now they may want to get you on their radar. Can you give us a bit of an overview, please? So GTA is really three properties. It's the North Shore property where we just completed a fantastic drilling program. The results were quite good, which is why we're evolving it from exploration to development. And then we have two other properties. We have the Burnt Pond Zinc Silver property, which we're quite excited about. And then we have Odden as well, which we're looking for joint venture partners on. Okay, so with these three properties in particular, I think it was the North Shore. You just had drilling results recently that were better maybe than you expected. So the drilling results at North Shore were quite good. They effect why we're doing this evolution from exploration to development. And the next step is really to take this North Shore property, incorporate all of the results, and come up with a new model for the high grade portion of the effort zone. So of course, you also have a zinc property and our analyst, Christopher Eccleston, is very bull on zinc. Can you tell me why you like zinc and a little bit more about this project? Yeah, we like zinc because we think it's got the best outlook of all the base metals. There's been five or six big line closures around the world over the last two, three years. Demand's growing in China. So we're really excited about our Burnt Pond project.  Correct. And of course, Jamie, now that you are the CEO, can you tell us what we as shareholders should anticipate over the next upcoming quarter or two? So we're going to be taking all the information that we just got from North Shore and we will be working hard to basically come up with a new model for the high grade portion of the effort zone. We'll be looking at permitting and really looking for an up to 50,000 ton bulk sample from North Shore. So that should be extremely exciting because it'll give us metallurgy. OK, so just kind of a wrap up here. You basically, after your North Shore drilling results, you're taking the company from exploration to development. So you kind of stepped in as CEO. So we should anticipate some large changes happening here this next year. Is that correct? Yeah, I think that's the goal. And we're still going to be exploring. We're going to look at the Burnt Pond project in Newfoundland. We've got some targets there. We'll be drilling before year-end. But we're really pushing hard to commercialize North Shore. You referenced quickly strategic partnerships. Can you tell us what you meant by that? So we have 85 kilometers of strike near Hearst, Ontario. And we're going to be looking for joint venture partners for that property. So, Jamie, congratulations on becoming the new CEO for GTA Resources. And thank you for joining us today. Thank you very much, Tracy.