Hei, gydigodd y byddai yn ymgyrch. Roedd i'n fwy oedd ydych yn fwy. Rydych yn credu'r gyrdd o'n cysylltu'n gweithio. Roedd yn gallu ei ddiddordeb, ond rydyn ni'n gyda'r gweithio, a'r gwybod i'r rôl yn meddwl. Mae'r gwaith y gallwn yw'r cyfnodd, ac mae'n gwybod i'n gael. Rwy'n gweithio eich cyfnodd, mae'n gweithio eich gweithio, roedd yn gwneud o'r tîr ddau os yw'r cyfnodd, Rwy'n ddweud yn gwybod i'w ddweud i ddweud o gael gwrthodraeth. A ydych chi'n ddweud, yn ddweud i'r ystafell. Mae'n ddweud yn ddweud i ddweud i ddweud, a'r ddweud i ddweud i ddweud i ddweud i ddweud, a ddweud i ddweud i ddweud i ddweud i ddweud i ddweud, felly llyfr oedd yn gwybod i'r ddweud. Felly, rwy'n gweinio wneud eich bod yn ei ddweud o'r ddweud. Roedd y ffordd ar hyn o'r ffordd, fod yw'r ffordd, bod yn ei ffordd, y byddwn i'r llwyddiad yn y ffordd, ond y byddwn i'n eu ffordd'r allan o'r ffordd. Yn hoffw'r ffordd, mae'n mynd i'r ffordd. Yn hoffw'r ffordd, mae'n mynd i'n meddwl'i, dyna'r ffordd, mae'n ffordd. 1. stepped 2. lawfully I'm obviously not allowed to sit here and read a book to you. because that would be if I read you a book then there would be no point in you going out and buying the book or atентher under the author and while my copyright law was so began an ended in law school I'm aware of the fact that I'm not able to sit in here and do a full book but I can read sections Fomnt for the purposes of education oedd yna'r gwaith yma, ac yn bwysig i gael gwybod i'r hwnnw, boi'r ddechrau'r llwythau, a dda'n gallu bod yn ddigonol'r hwnnw. Yr hwnnw'n ddiddordeb o'r cerddol yma yn y rhagleniol. Roedd beth sydd wedi gydag o'r bylion o'r wyf yn gwneud yr wych. Rhyw ddaeth David Craig. Ac mae'n ddiffen chi ei fod yn ei ddifachol iawn, felly mae'n golygu penderfeydd ac mae'n gweld amdano'r lle o'r bros ждuc yn ymddangos o y cerddsstywi'n b 갑od mennyddiant. Felly nid o'm hwnnw i'r llyfr yw hwnnw, nid o'n hwnnw i'r llyfr eu gweithio i'r llyfr a i'r llyfr o'r gweithio i'r llyfr er fydd y bach hwnnw. Y llyfr wedi y nich iddyn nhw yn gwybod eich undrall. Nid o'r llyfr yn llyfr i'r llyfr eich hwnnw ddannod drwy gweithio But the big charity that I've supported longest is the RSPCA. Regardless of the criticisms that they receive, I also know that they rescue thousands of dogs every year. And if they didn't rescue all those dogs every year, well, I suspect nobody would. So that's the reason I continue to support the RSPCA and other large-ish, maen nhw'n meddwl y cairtyn ymlaen chi'n mynd i'r un bod yna'r hyn sy'n meddwl yma. Rwy'n meddwl y gallwn y cairtyn, rwy'n meddwl, rwy'n meddwl y gallwn i'r cyfwyrdd y peth, yr ysgrifennu, yr yw'r gwerthau i'r cyfwyrdd yma'r ymgyrch. Mae yma'n meddwl yma'r cairtyn. Fe ydych chi'n gwoith'r llyfr y maen nhw hwnnw. Fy hwn oedd y rhan sy'n gwybod nhw'n gweithio'r llyfr yn llyfr o'i'r ysgolwyd ar y mae. Mae'n gweithio, mae hi'n gweithio llyfr. Ond efallai yn ddechrau sy'n gweithio'r llyfr o'r llyfr yn y llyfr o'r llyfr. Mae'r llyfr wedi'n gwneud ymarfer, ac mae'n ddysgu'n ddysgu'n gweithio'r llyfr. Rydym mi, dylai'r chyfwo i'n meddwl mancwyr yn ddigonol, ac mae'r cwrch yn olygu i rydymniadol. Yn dechrau ysbun, mae noddol o'r allan o hyn o'ch ffrindill argyfwyr i'r wneud. Mae'n gwerth negredu'r llyfech wynghoru cyntaf yn y bwysig ychydig. ac mae'n cael ei wneud bod hynny yn ystyried. Mae'r bobl a'r gwaith cyfnodd ac mae'r hyn yn hyn yn ystod a'u byddai'r lleol. Mae gennym ei gweithio. Ond rwy'n rhoi'n cael ei gweithio'n cael ei gweithio'n cael ei gweithio. Yn gyflwyno'r pwysig, mae'r gweithio'n gwneud o'r gwaith cyfnodd y byddai'n cerddau, Fundraising Fund is Chapter 4, that's about what's known as Chuggers, and about the agencies.   Having a read of that will tell you how much money agencies get, agencies who supply the Chuggers. So there's a lot of middlemen, there's a lot of different organisations involved, a lot of expenses, and in many cases it's actually only a smaller percentage than its donors, I suggest. Realise that actually go for the fundamental charitable cause that the group represents, whatever charity, whatever they actually do to help people is actually a much smaller percentage of your money than you might think. OK, so I'm going to take you through some of Chapter 5, which is playing politics. And this one is what come as any surprise to anyone, but let me read just apart from it. In the middle of June 2014 there was a major outbreak of hostilities. This was not in the Ukraine nor in Iraq. This was in Britain and it was between the charity sector and its supporters on one side and the Conservative Party on the other. The flash point seems to have been the publication by Oxfam of a report titled The Perfect Storm, Economic Stagnation, the Rising Cost of Living, Public Spending Cuts and the Impact on UK Poverty. In its report Oxfam made a number of claims which understandably somewhat upset the Tories. For example Oxfam wrote, the economy is stagnating, unemployment is increasing, prices are rising, incomes are falling and spending on public services is being cut back rapidly. In addition the Oxfam report threw out some very spine chilling statistics. 13.5 million people live in poverty in Britain. The UK is one of the most unequal rich countries in the world. 5.5 million UK households are affected by fuel poverty. The UK has weaker protection for those in work than Mexico and so on. Oxfam accompanied its report with a tweet, mocked up film poster. Several times I've asked Oxfam for permission to include a copy of its poster and tweet in my book and each time Oxfam has refused. So I'll have to describe the mocked up film poster as I'm not allowed to show it. The poster depicted a rough foaming tempestuous sea under a dark gloomy threatening sky and the film title The Perfect Storm. Underneath the title was the text. Zero hour contracts, high prices, benefit cuts, unemployment, childcare costs. Some people might wonder why Oxfam seems to have adopted a fairly low profile when unemployment shot up by a shocking 55% from 1.62 million to 2.51 million from 2007 to 2010 under new labour while energy and food prices also rocketed. Yet Oxfam launched its campaign against poverty in the UK while unemployment was falling by 17% from 2.51 million to 2.08 million under the coalition and in spite of Oxfam's and the government's claims of public spending cuts public spending was still rising inexorably. So that's just part. So what have we learned immediately from that is that the charity, certainly this charity, is politically biased because at the time when the economic situation was worse under labour no such report was published by Oxfam when things are actually improving under the Conservatives Oxfam comes out with this report condemning the Conservative government while being silent on a worse performing Labour government. So what are we being told? We're being told that charity politically biased towards the left and it should come with as absolutely no surprise at all because it seems that the entire... the public sector, the education sector, the charity sector, the media all biased in favour of the left and charities are no different. We can see that immediately with a fairly standard example. Let me give you a couple more. A few pages down, headline, Politics or Us. Many other charities have also been tempted away from their main focus on relieving suffering into campaigning to change attitudes and the law. Christian Aid has been criticised for bias in favour of the Palestinians and against the Israelis. Once again, standard left wing stuff. And there's no reason, there's no reason for Christian Aid to express bias in favour of Palestinians and against Israelis. I'm not sure why that's their role. It goes on to say, moreover, in 2013 Christian Aid staff joined with ACT Alliance and other global partners at the United Nations Rio Plus 20 summit in Brazil to lobby the UK government on sustainable energy and putting down on tax avoidance and the concept of a green economy. Also in 2013 Christian Aid sent its tax justice bus around the country. By the end of its 53-day tour of Britain and Ireland, more than 5,000 people including 56 MPs have climbed aboard to hear how tax dodging hurts people both here at home and in the world's poorest countries. During the tour, 10,000 people signed the Tick for Tax Justice Action Cards which called on Prime Minister David Cameron to use his global leadership to tackle tax dodging. Many donors to Christian Aid might be surprised to learn that their money was being used to campaign supposed global warming or climate change or whatever it's called by the time this book is published to campaign for a higher planet saving green taxes or energy bills and to pay for a touring bus demanding a clap down on tax avoidance. Many donors may indeed wonder. But again, it's obvious, the bias in favour of left wing causes is absolutely obvious. He goes on to say that much love saves the children also got slightly burned when it tried its hand at politics. It had launched a TV ad with actors in it. Again, you wonder how much money is actually being paid out. Another aspect that he addresses is the issue of fake charities and that's what he calls charities which do not actually receive a great deal of public funding but instead government funding and you have to wonder and the question one of the questions he raises in this book is why if they are not supported by the public to the point where the public is willing to donate directly to them why are they being supported by the public indirectly through taxation so the public are essentially being forced to support charities that they don't support independently and they don't support without doing so indirectly through their taxes and charities do receive millions upon millions of pounds in taxpayers' money while raising very little independently and you do have to wonder why that is. Also the number of charities. There are hundreds of thousands of charities in this country. I kid you not, hundreds of thousands of them. Okay, back to some of the politics and moving on in the book. Britain's charities haven't always been so politically active. Prior to the arrival of new labour any form of political lobbying by a charity or campaigning to have laws changed could only be incidental or ancillary to its charitable purpose and could not be a charity's dominant activity. But in 2002 the Prime Minister's strategy unit advocated a loosening of the rules because charities perform a valuable role in campaigning for social change. The strategy unit proposed the guidelines on campaigning should be revised to encourage charities to play this role to the fullest extent. Sure enough in 2004 an obedient charity commission changed its rules to allow charities to engage in non-party political campaigning provided this activity was not the dominant method by which the organisation will pursue its apparently charitable objects. Quite unsurprising yet again that this happened under Tony Blair. So many awful things happened under Tony Blair. Like the opening of the borders for example the introduction of political correctness, the introduction of fearfulness, the introduction of hate speech laws and other divisive and fracturing policies and mindsets. But yes it happened under Tony Blair unsurprisingly because knowing full well that if charities were able to campaign politically while they may not be able to be obviously and overtly party aligned it's pretty obvious that when they bring out, when Oxfam brings out a report under the Tory government when actually the economic situation was improving it stayed silent under a Labour government. This is what they were always going to do and you will have groups and we have had groups like various different charities hope not hate, various different groups who are registered in various different ways but are absolutely engaged in political activism and political campaigning and it is in with the promotion of left-wing ideals in mind. Also within this book and I'm going to, I'll read just a little bit of this to you but I won't give it all to you because for the reasons I explained at the top. Okay so we're moving forward a little bit beyond the Labour government the Blair Brown Labour years to the coalition years so he writes possibly concerned by the growing extent of political campaigning by charities and other bodies in January 2014 the coalition introduced the transparency of lobbying non-party campaigning and trade union administration bill. The aims of the bill were quite modest it only required other than the short period from the dissolution of parliament up to the general election campaigning groups should register their spending with the electoral commission if it exceeded more than £450,000 across the whole of the UK or more than 9,750 in any single constituency the 450,000 was a reduction from the previous level of 988,000 these proposals were met with hells of anguished fury by many charities and the apologists one called the bill the charity gagging bill and said it would have a chilling effect on democracy. No, what has a chilling effect on democracy is charities that the public believes because those charities are presented to us as concerned for the thing they focus on for the issue they focus on so if it's a poverty charity we believe the public believes that they are concerned for charity and that they are politically unbiased that their purpose is to fight poverty is to use by charitable means to raise money through a registered charity and operating charity to fight poverty and that they will do that fairly and across the board with whichever government happens to be in power. This is what people expect and charities are invited on to television and to news programmes and current affairs programmes in that guise that they are presenting a objective analysis of a particular issue for example poverty so why they would hell infuri at simply having their spending reduced during the campaign period which is a short period and call it a chilling effect on democracy when the real chilling effect on democracy is that we are presented with something that is we assume to be unbiased but is actually itself engaging in political posturing and political campaigning for political parties that's what's chilling having a chilling effect on democracy because the people don't realise that these charities are party bias and they are because they go after the Tories but stay silent about Labour and we have groups like Christian Aid parroting left-wing causes also the same causes that are parroted by Labour that's where the real chilling effect on democracy is one thing I'd really really recommend that you read from this is the salary increases across the public sector in the last couple of decades I am absolutely, absolutely shocking I want to move on to foreign aid but I will before I finish up I wasn't going to give you these again for the reasons I said at the top of the thing I can't give you too much of what this fantastic writer has put together but I highly, highly recommend this book it is filled with information that I think you'll find very interesting so let's move on to foreign aid and political correctness political correctness has truly, truly spoiled so much hasn't it it has ruined our free speech it has ruined our politics it has ruined our politics in so many ways it has destroyed our media because journalists can't get work if they're in any way objective they have to toe the line but political correctness is also the reason for the extraordinary high levels of foreign aid that we are giving away while our own people are struggling so chapter 6 is the chapter on foreign aid I'll read you a small section of it the poverty problem when most people think of foreign aid they tend to imagine brave aid workers rescuing people from earthquakes tsunamis, floods, famines and other such natural disasters but this emergency aid accounts for an extremely small part of the foreign aid money we give either directly to charities or through our taxes to charities and various relief agencies perhaps just 5 to 6 billion of the 135 billion a year in foreign aid is emergency aid the other 95% or so 95% of charity and aid money goes to what's called development aid helping countries escape from poverty and putting them on the path to development in the last 60 years around $3 trillion has been donated by developed countries to help poor countries there have been some successes extreme poverty has been more than halved diseases like river blindness and smallpox have all but been eradicated and millions of lives have been saved from famine and conflict moreover many aid recipients have managed to break free from poverty and achieve rising levels of prosperity for their people move on a little bit but while most formally poor Asian and some South American countries have made significant progress on the road to development and modernisation too many countries particularly in Africa have stagnated or even become more impoverished over the last few decades in spite of being given more in aid than any other part of the world so that's the point made there is that despite all the money more money than any other part of the world is poured into Africa and despite that things are actually getting worse in Africa in Europe after the second world war the US sponsored Marshall Plan is generally credited for helping war ravaged European countries rebuild and become prosperous so some people have demanded a Marshall Plan for Africa there's only one problem with this demand Africa has already had its Marshall Plan several times over in the last 50 years Africa has been given the equivalent of around 10 Marshall Plans in today's money the 5 year European Marshall Plan saw about 100 billion dollars 20 billion a year being used to rebuild Europe after world war 2 in the last 50 years Africa has received over 1 trillion dollars in aid Africa received about the same every year 20 billion a year for 50 years that Europe received each year for just 5 years yet there's little evidence that those countries getting most aid have benefited from this aid and a quarter of Sub-Saharan countries including some of the world's recipients of most foreign aid are now poorer than they were in 1960 let me find where it talks in detail about corruption we are essentially what he argues is that money is being spent particularly in Africa not even remotely on attacking poverty just not a thing not a priority at all he's going to the pockets of warlords it funds tribal wars he goes in to great detail about the eye watering levels of money that is going into fight tribal wars in Africa and is going into the pockets of corrupt dictators but also the charity industry the anti-poverty industry and these people that work in this anti-poverty industry drive flashy Mercedes Benz Africa there's a name for them actually a nickname which refers to the cars that are driven by those who are supposed to be fighting poverty but it is the corruption and he talks in some detail about why and how we're not actually allowed to talk about this corruption why even though we know that money is going the vast vast bulk of the money is going to buy weapons and to fight wars and to keep in fact many ways to keep poverty going we don't require that the money is spent a certain way and we don't require it because that would amount to neopolonialism that's what we would be accused of look at the white people telling the black people what to do with their money he's absolutely right he's absolutely right but we are expected to hand over billions to these countries and we're not allowed to ask or require that money to be spent a certain way because that would be wait for it, guess what you got it didn't you racist absolutely of course it would so we have to be happy be happy with all our taxes going into the pockets of warlords fighting bloody tribal wars all over Africa because a small percentage of the money we pay may feed someone hungry when the warlords have had their lines share so in order we go along with this by the way we allow this to happen and we also pay to allow aid to go into hostile countries so they pay at the border they bribe at the border a large large if not most of the money is spent your money is spent just bribing to get the stuff into side of the country in the first place and we're okay with all this the people in charge are okay with all this because it's the price we pay billions just to get a small percentage through to people who are actually struggling and dying and we have accepted the fact that the vast majority goes into the pockets of warlords we know we know this and we still do it and by the way that's your money that is your money well you don't have a library or a community centre or the elderly people are living in shoddy care homes or disabled people are living on the bread line or kids living in poverty right here in this country you have to be happy with the fact that your money instead of going to our pensioners instead of going to our kids in poverty is going in to the pockets of already wealthy warlords is going to pay for weapons for African tribes and you have to be okay with that because a little bit of the money might get through to the poor people in that country that's foreign aid okay one thing one last thing I'm going to read from this but do get this book it's really really great the population explosion he talks greatly he talks a great length about the population of and again it's largely Africa how can a he asked the question and it's a very valid question how can you reduce poverty in a country where it's a population is exploding and exploding and exploding you can't and this is why I have argued and have been ridiculously accused of supporting eugenics for this I have argued that we need a reduction in birth rates among in various parts of the world I'm not suggesting eugenics for crying out loud and I'm not suggesting sterilisation either what I am suggesting is what Christopher Hitchens suggested which was access to contraception and the empowerment of women let women decide for themselves or at least have something as Christopher Hitchens argued over how many children they have because I guarantee you women don't want to be pregnant every nine months they don't want to be raising child after child with barely enough to feed themselves and if women had any say in any of this those birth rates would not be so high and we would not have this poverty but because of religious and cultural attitudes that women are walking uterus and she must have child after child after child religious and cultural objections to any sort of say by women cuts this thing down very sharply and you end up in a situation where people are just having baby after baby after baby and they already can't afford to feed themselves this is how you cure world poverty let women stop having babies when they want to stop having babies and I guarantee you most of them will he goes on to tell us some of the figures of this in 1984 the song do they know it's Christmas was released by Bandaid to raise money to help the starving victims of the 83 to 85 Ethiopian famine the record plus the following years live aid concert raised around 150 million in 1965 18 years before the start of the famine the population of Ethiopia was about 25 million in 1984 it had passed 39 million today today Ethiopia's population is around 96 million so during the 80s the famine of the 80s where live aid came from remember live aid the population of Ethiopia was 39 million today it's 96 million how on earth can we expect 150 million was actually pretty modest amount raised by the live aid concert how can that have any kind of impact in a country which population is growing that much that quickly the population problem is the problem other countries the same in 1965 the population of Somalia was 3 million today it's above 11 million in Sudan including South Sudan the 1965 population was 12 million today it's around 50 million here is a problem we need to bring down birth rates all over the world but you're not it's controversial even just to say it because someone is going to accuse you of something ridiculous like wanting sterilisation or whatever it may be I do want to find just a couple of these figures if I can as to the public sector pay increases no I'm probably going to because I wasn't going to give you these because like I said I didn't want to give away too much of the fantastic information included in this book wouldn't you know wouldn't you know I'm not going to find it at this point really irritating you and spending ages looking for you see this is the problem with these things this is one of the reasons I don't like reading on these things you can't mark pages it's really awkward I'll tell you what I'll do on my live stream next week I'll go through and find some of the figures and talk about this a little bit so I won't spend too long rummaging through it this evening it's okay okay so thoroughly recommend that book to you and you will find the most amazing information in there about where money goes and it's a difficult one because I don't want people to I don't want people to not give to poverty or to charity but I I also think we should know I think people deserve to know and this is an absolutely brilliant brilliant gathering together thoroughly detailed thoroughly detailed okay I found I found a little bit of what I wanted to read to you okay let's have let me read to you a little bit of this I won't read it all because it's unfair on the author just let me read you a little bit in 2007 just before the financial collapse and the recession there were in the region of 600 people in local councils being paid 100,000 a year or more 64 people on 150,000 a year and a couple of other figures right so in 2007 we had there were 600 people in local councils being paid more than 100,000 a year 600 yeah by 2013 so what's that 2017 to 2013 six years after years by 2013 after years of supposed we're all in this together austerity there were a more impressive 2,180 181 on 100,000 a year or more so we went from 600 people in 2007 to 2,181 in the space of six years in the public sector being paid more than 100,000 or more the over the same period the average remuneration package of the 10 highest paid council executives jumped from 203,000 a year to above 270,000 a year a rise of 33% during one of the worst recessions in British history once again this is leftism this is the fat category of the public sector that happens under left wing governance and I actually include the Tories in left wing governance at this point because it continues yes it all happened under new labour but it continues under the Tories the Tories ought to be taking to be taking a grip on this and I consider this to be wasteful public spending I really do and if we're going to get into I'm not suggesting that people in the public sector shouldn't be paid well it depends really, it depends on what they do I think doctors and surgeons in the NHS and nurses in the NHS should be paid a lot more it really depends on the extent of their work and what they do and how much they earn this and I'm not entirely convinced that everyone who earns 270,000 a year for example in the public sector is contributing if we look at local councils for example if they are doing a fantastic job for the local people are they is the question and you wonder how much the local people are suffering how many cuts the local people are being subjected to in order to pay this 270k to a council executive stuff to make the blood boil really when you think about it fascinating book highly recommended as I say nice short book nice easy read lots and lots of very interesting information in there that's it for me for this evening I shall be back in my own room back to normal back to live streaming next week rest of the week I am in London speaking at a protest to remove the disgusting rapists from Rochdale who have been deported they should be out of the country by now should be out of the country by now and yet they're not out of the country by now and we want to know why and we want them out of the country so if you're in London or near London this Saturday it's midday at Parliament Square Jenny is making herself now so time to start see you back on my live stream on Monday or if you're in London see you on Saturday in London take care until then


In order to bring on common touch that the country needs if elected, he spoke after a closed-door meeting with former President Lucia Gungo-Basso John Ina Belcuta of the Uggumstead Capital. Aquabio said he would continue the positive impact of President Muhammad al-Buhari in agriculture, power sector, among others. He added that he would bring on common transfiguration he orchestrated in Aqua-Ibn-Stit as a governor to the country if given the chance. We came on a courtesy call to the former president and as one of the greatest leaders in Nigeria to intimate him and the good people of the state of our intention, my intention to contest not just the nomination of my party, the All Progressive Congress but also to clean the ticket to run for the presidency of Nigeria come 2023 because I believe that power belongs to God and only God alone can give power. And at the stage we are in Nigeria today, I would like to have a serious continuity of the positive impact the president is making in the agricultural sector, in the infrastructure sector and all that and then of course also the need for integration of the nation in terms of national unity. I've done it before as governor of Aqua-Ibn-Stit when I brought on common transfiguration to my state and I believe that at this time now Nigeria needs it.


Good morning everybody this session. It's gonna be in in in Spanish because we have a an incredible panel here so Vamos a pasar al español. So we're gonna move to English with the representatives From Latin America. We have Gonzalo who is a Chilean who will be speaking to us about the challenges We have in the region on the beat system And Gina from Mexico who will talk to us about diversity and development of human potential and Marcella About the need for a geographical Diversity and inclusion and my name is Facundo. I am a national member of parliament Very involved with social lab and we have seen for a number of years now in Latin America a New development and new movement, especially among the young of people who are trying to Generate a greater impact and that greater impact looks for providing benefits to society not so much For an economic profit but a benefit or in quality of life and we have seen all of these Organization system be I got a social lab and so on who are looking for creating a better world But with different models that is inclusive Models those who look for solving the big problems of the world But also the element of companies Generating this double or triple impact to do so Some of this has been Being developed by Gonzalo with three cycles. I would love for you to tell us what this equal doesn't thank you Facundo Thank you for your invitation three cycles is a big company Working on circular economy in the world of packaging So we say that trash is a design mistake and we have to understand everything from the origin of the design to the end and taking into advancing to account everybody to Help those who are gathering trash and so on The purpose is to create an economy with an economy Circular and inclusive society. I understand you are linked to B system system of a For those who don't know what it is about. Can you tell us what it is indeed? I had the privilege of Of co-founding system ABN three cycle was the first the big company outside the US We used it as an example for expanding the big corpse and The companies are legally bounded to Change So beside having a financial Result they must have a social result that can be demanded We can change the success in business not only in a business Result but also a well-being for the Society and for the planet taking to account that model this inclusion model with a different system Which is much more fair and a much better distributed Gina is doing something similar in Mexico Looking to develop the human potential especially inclusion, right? Why don't you tell us what you do in Mexico with the foundation? What did this is? Well, thank you My fight is to have an inclusive Mexico to see the potential of people I started ten years ago with a foundation eyes that feel oh oska sientin to work on disabilities and on handicapped people and Four years ago. We started with a spin-off a Social company for a wide spread which is the potential looking for the potential of people who? People who are not being seen for what they know what they are and if we manage to introduce some changes So that they may be inclusive in the social system I'm sure we will get a social and economic mobility and that is our fight About these inclusion problem. Why don't you tell us what your original? Is that feel well, I am a photographer and I wanted to Break a limited conversation and in trying to the searcher for the people with that are visually impaired I tried to work on photo because I thought how come blind people are making pictures the answer is if you see the Potential of the handicapped people and you see what they do they feel they Listen and they want to be included in their conversation who is fully visual that is how we started by Disrupting this conversation. Okay, that person doesn't see but they have other strongholds And we created a movement that starts with the picture taking photographs and people are then included and Now the company start to see the abilities and of these people we have managed to include them in companies For them to be independent. We have worked very hard on that We are talking about the abilities not the handicapped and people who are handicapped. We are not working on So how is our Latin American region today regarding inclusion with this kind of disability? I understand some countries do have some regulations Where the private companies have regulation to include a percentage of Workers with people with the different abilities. How does our region worker in this well in Mexico? We're just started where they try to put quotas, but what they do now is force companies who have more than 50 people working with them for the Facilities to be fully accessible for these people. We have created that conscience that awareness but I'm sure quotas will start the invitation and What I'm trying to do is make sure that this population Has a number of abilities, but you first have to train them So why don't we start training them with energy 20 with Unilever? We started this Initiative to train the talent and then include them that is our fight to get there is a need There's a greater and greater demand of the companies to be Including these talents because we know it's an asset asset. It's not philanthropy But of course you have to do something before that is to train them in certain areas and Why don't we focus on a the resiliency tends to be creative proactive and so that's where the big opportunity lies? Marcella in your case. You're working in Argentina right with some greater challenges for our Region which is the migration to people to the bigger cities and leaving the small towns empty Why don't you tell us a little bit what you do the case of Argentina is an example of things that happen throughout our region in Latin America in Argentina 70% of the Cities have less than 2,000 inhabitants 70% in other words Argentina is a Country of rural villages, but there are 17 cities and 30% of a village leaves in point 14% of the Territory so we have a big on balance in balance with very little Development and there are no opportunity for people to understand that there are economic opportunity and they migrate to the big cities and This is a problem with two faces Maybe you don't mind that little villages become empty But we see that that the big cities are absolutely Unlivable with so many people that don't even know where to live and how to be included So that is a problem. We have been working on we started in 2000 With a good difficult context that became even worse In spite of that we discovered the through mappings of sustainability of each of the villages Argentina the potential we have and That is our mission through a tourism a program also cultural program also teaching Jobs there is an Argentina that is waiting if you ask me later I'll tell you what we're doing from that standpoint. We saw that some people are spot Working on Generating this impact they're doing that bottom up Now what is being done from top-down each country is implementing a public policies to solve environmental problem as a case of tricycle or diversity Is the case of eyes that feel are you case with the foundation that is a searching for this institution Is it's something being done? Is there a cooperation from the government in Gonzalo? You said something that is being done in Chile, which is a combination of not only the government But the companies are actively participating. Is that right indeed? I Think that the first thing as has been said is the organization. It is looking for a social impact And that organization has to be Self-sustainable then it is part of a segment for example Each of us is working in a segment and we have to make sure it works properly But then there is the country as a country as a dimension And what we're saying before is this in Chile. There is a very interesting case We have an initiative that is called three times. I 40 of the most important companies in Chile with their owners as called upon by the chamber of commerce 25 of the main founders working on poverty Some of the most the biggest innovators some of the people representing the b companies and b corporations and academia to work together on Getting a new dream for the country stemming from the need to restore Confidence and that example is I'm sure something that should be happening everywhere because I think we have a trust Crisis a confidence trust where everybody is looking inward and within each sector each of them Tends to look inward. So now we have to generate this confidence space To understand that we're all living on the same boat even some other species And nobody will be able to save his or her life on his own So considering the problems we have the people around it We have to generate a space where we meet and a space where we are ready to trust To get integrated So as to really place innovation at the helm Do you see that the possibility can be scalable to latin america to generate Clear conscience throughout the country or an awareness With this possibility of having competition We absolutely this was started two months ago The first meeting was on march 20 and it was long ago that we didn't See all of the media working positive talking positively. There were no criticisms. It was positive for everybody So we expect that example not only to be scalable in chile in chile But also to become an invitation for the state to intervene Which public policies should be done and what should these policies do? And we have to carry out these cross sectoral alliances Where we have a common country and a common planet It would be I take advantage of this saying that system be Once for a simple law to be valid for the whole Latin America that started in the congress that is the shared benefits It's a model of b-corps That we hope will be replicated throughout the region. Can you talk us a little bit? Well today in the world There are some 200 b-corps that are certified and we have 33 states where it has become a law In other words people are bound by that Not only with certain promotion elements for the companies, but it has to they have to identify the systems as having a purpose beyond profitability Argentina is one of the countries in the region that is is Leading the big law chile the same colombia the same we are starting in mexico in brazil australia And already 55 countries in the world have b-corps and in all these countries we are generating links With the legislative to make sure we enact a law Under this and then we really find what success means in the world of business And let's forget about the good guys the bad guys We're all on the same in the same boat and if we dig a little bit We will see that we have common dreams Common needs and that we have to open that and to find the human being behind that Because that is what unites us in the case of mexico. Gina. What's the situation is the government Promoting that kind of initiatives are there companies that are linked to the third sector? Well We see the model where the third sector and the government get together now who starts Well that varies in my case It started through the private sector That joined with the third sector and then we call on the government But that varies from country to country That's how it went in our case We went with the company to tell them what is the value we're giving Because we are in a stage where we don't have the good guys and the bad guys anymore That we have a reality that must be revisited to say what is good and what is not good What are the needs what are the social impacts that we are looking for in our case It has been this what is the value that can be given to the company We see everyday more entrepreneurs working inside companies that are really having an influence in the supply chain in the process Not only in a philanthropic from social responsibility, but in the process Of course, we have to add the government to scale up and to have a greater impact in my case It has been through the private sector. We joined the third sector other NGOs other foundations And we then call upon the government say hey, we've settled the whole thing How don't you why don't you join us and we scale together because then we cannot go everybody on their own course And if I see a change from 10 years ago when I started eyes that feel I did it as a foundation because we don't didn't have a social entrepreneur But it is a self sustainable mother. That's why it has been acknowledged as a social endeavor But that we did see changes. Do you think there is a trend In the region taking into account these new entrepreneurs that are ever more active The new millennia millennia Do you see there is a regional trend to generate these models that are not only a foundation Looking to solve the big problems that has also a business model behind that generate some profit as well The and therefore gives sustainability I think it has been a shift moving towards social endeavor the foundation becomes every day more Vehicle for some actions for some profiles for some cases that can be pushed And we see a shift towards a social endeavor social entrepreneurship We have more and more social entrepreneurs and not so many foundations or the hybrids I'm one of the hybrids the i'm a foundation But then there is a greater need where the vehicle of the foundation both legal and structural was too small And we needed a bigger one and I think this has been seen In the case of argentina as a foundation Do you you know the complexity for entrepreneur? Can you tell us how difficult was for you? Well, I would say That it isn't that difficult to Be entrepreneur and to innovate the problem is to remain over time When I started 17 years ago The first 12 years were particularly difficult to work with the government the companies were the ones that helped us and individuals At any rate in our society There is not too much of our philanthropic culture that has been Really set up so people are the companies are not really available to provide give you your time and their money When you talk about money then The Pockets are not that deep In spite of that We managed to make some headway But in those countries where they have a big inflation like the one We saw in argentina in 2012 Plus when there is not a regulatory framework that enables the companies to pay And if you add to that the fact That as a non not for profit organization have the same taxes and responsibility with the state when you hire human resources and set up Teams It is difficult and to be able to sustain that and to make some headway is difficult. However When you say hey, why don't we join with others to be stronger? Well in our case three years ago We started together with two other Local NGOs under the umbrella of a swiss foundation the first repopulation Project argentina we're doing that in the province of santa fe in a village When we said we want to do this project 2000 families registered and we only needed 20 We were going to take 20 Entrepreneur families in rosario santa fe to develop that in a village The project is Being developed for more than a year with a big success The difficult part is now to knock upwards a little now there are more people now there are four organizations But there is an urgency context where there's no long made a long term of vision Which is needed everywhere latin America, but they are desperate by the short term And that is why I believe That these funding models for social entrepreneurs are not really very well developed They're not clear And I think the millennium entrepreneurs Well, there has been a lot of innovation a lot of creativity many solutions that have are proven And the entrepreneur is false somewhere in the middle Considering that and what happens At a regional level Now worldwide How does Latin America score when compared to other parts of the world when we talk about ecosystems with Entrepreneurs that are really pushed by this double or triple impact Gonzalo, what is your perspective of our region vis-à-vis the rest of the Is there innovation is the technology? Do we have some kind of an impact? Well, I think that latin america Is an area with its big challenges big problems Which are easy to be seen we have for example a big Problem with inequity We have a problem that we have so many good natural resources that being degraded In other words, what we've seen from a social entrepreneurship perspective Is not different from asia or africa in terms of needs and entrepreneurship What is surprising? In the world of social for-profit entrepreneurship, latin america has had a very particularly relevant role Chile is the Country with the highest number of b-corps per people Argentina has also been leading And the changes of Argentina in b-corps has been fantastic at colombia same thing. So some countries have a I can't do the two things at the same time. Why is this a generational problem? Why do you think this is like that? It's difficult because it's multivariable in terms of a generation We have I think that is a global issue. I think the new generations have a different Sensibility vis-à-vis the previous one and most of those in this room We did have serious problems in our education and training in terms of setting Our lines are in a linear excluding and monodimensional economy where all the county was to make money Whereas now we're talking about a multi-dimensional inclusive circular economy And that for the new generations is something that they find more natural to understand in addition It happens that in our countries we have The possibility to come into contact with the power sectors leaving brazil aside, which is a continent But that can be achieved in the other countries We don't find it that difficult to reach Decision makers and those that can make big changes. So those spaces like the ones jena just mentioned allow you to Involve the social entrepreneurship sector with civil society Big companies and reach the state with a proposal. That's something that is happening and it's feasible in our countries Our countries have that virtue. We have five minutes left I'd like to take two questions from the audience other microphones available Any other question While we wait for the mic Thank you i'm rafael arouso from mexico We vacunda was referring to the potential we have with all the millennials To have a triple impact. Which do you think is the main challenge? for social Entrepreneurship so it becomes a mainstream activity. What are the main challenges? Very well, let's take the other question i'm margarita italian from the cordoba hub You know the b-corp system very well But even if those companies are sustainable, they do not have the economic or operational model to scale up their models in other countries since That can only be achieved by traditional for-profit companies and my question is about the ip projection How could we promote this system as soon as they know that a b system a b corp cannot be scaled up? How can you disseminate information and about their model? Based on the experience i've had working With the private sector and social enterprises I see this as a dance. You have to find the right rhythm And It's not either or But it's a compliment to become mainstream There are interests cultural changes that need to be made in companies And i'll i always invite other social entrepreneurs To understand the needs of companies and how the world moves and what's happening in the social world So we need to find common ground so that we can Develop this concept and make it mainstream. I wouldn't say that social entrepreneurship Will become the only way in which things can be done. We have to supplement each other in today's world And let me make a comment here Ultimately an entrepreneur Seeks opportunities and In that search for opportunities to solve big problems is where the biggest opportunities lie Latin america is full of problems So an opportunity is to find solutions to each one of those problems if we managed to Turn the solution to those big word problems With a business model that's sustainable over time That would be that perfect dance that gene is referring to combining a business that ends up being for profit But it's ultimately finding solutions for the big problems of the world And I think those are the new challenges and new world trends and I believe all millennials are born focused on that Let me refer to the second question First we need to understand what scaling up means because there are different dimensions to scaling up And the more natural one is to say I want to take this to all regions and countries in the world That's one dimension another dimension To scaling up is finding a solution taking a solution somewhere myself or with others And another dimension is scaling up in terms of depth of what you're doing and that's also feasible when you say I don't want to move elsewhere I want to deepen the impact in the place where I operate those are the three dimensions In which we understand the system B has to move Scaling up in all dimensions now when you're a company you have to respect the fact that there are companies that want to scale up in a Global dimension and others that want to scale up by deepening their impact In the case of B corpse generally speaking what you said at the beginning is real Of the 2100 B corpse in the world most are SMEs Small companies not all of them have the possibility to scale up Their challenge is to respect the values with which they were created and Managed to have a triple impact And and now I'm speaking in my capacity as a villa board of directors member in the us and in the last 10 years We managed to create an infrastructure that infrastructure was created based on SMEs Our challenge is to scale up to becoming mainstream without losing our integrity and our values today We are laying bridges with international multinational companies like Unilever, Danoni They are doing a great job in certifying their subsidiaries But in addition there are 60 000 companies in the world that are using the B impact assessment tool to understand their impact to measure themselves and start measuring their outcomes In terms of the triple impact That's allowing other small and medium-sized companies to scale up in different dimensions Geographical in some cases and in terms of depth in others As regards IP that's collaborative economy And that's integrated into the rationale of B corpse and a B company or any other company might say My knowledge is so important that I won't dare to take it Elsewhere and others will say I want to use open source and I want to everyone to know this there are countless alternatives and options There are many gray areas But I think this is the world of collaborative economics which we need to embrace and enhance Very well to respect the time assigned to our session. Let me Thank this panel. I am convinced that we are in the right Track I'm convinced that Latin America will lead this movement because of the characteristics It has considering all the opportunities available considering the entrepreneurs we have and the social sensitivity we have So thank you very much and congratulations for your work


Okay Bryson. So we know that you have this wonderful testimony to share with us about healing. So first we want to know what was the problem that you were facing and how long were you dealing with it and just give us a few examples of What kind of pain it was causing in your life? Yeah, so I had this weird like spasm in my upper abdomen and It was weird because it had it for like a year year and a half and it kind of started out gradually It just every now and then I'd get this weird pain and I'd brush it off I wouldn't think much of it then it started growing and then Just time after time. I just noticed it was really hurting and I went to the doctor He told me that it had to do with gastritis which gastritis runs in my family and It was just something that I was like, okay Well, I need to start doing what I can to take care of it and also I'm just gonna keep praying and believing God that It's gonna go away But time went on and the pain just kept getting worse and worse and the spasms actually went from just every now and then to every day almost all day and When it when it did stop it would only be for like an hour a half hour And then it would come back and it'd be just it felt like something was moving in my stomach But it was like my muscle something was like bulging out It felt like a foreign object in my stomach and so as it was doing this I just kind of over time Started to think well, maybe this is you know I Started kind of accepting the lie a little bit just getting used to it not that I not that I you know wanted it but it was just I got used to it and It was it was last week Pastor Vlad started talking about Dominant thoughts, what are our dominant thoughts and one of the dominant thoughts he was talking about was sickness And I realized I'm like man. I know this is not of God. I know this is not for me I know that God has health for me and that he died for my sicknesses and so during prayer As we're praying everybody was praying in tongues in the atmosphere Which is filled with the presence of God.  Amen. Let's put our hands together for wonderful Jesus Hallelujah. Truly our God is an awesome God. So Bryson now you said it was last week that this happened. How are you feeling now? How long has it been? Yeah, so this whole week. I have not had that spasm in my stomach Which like I said before if it stopped it was like a half hour an hour at most And last week I told Ivan I was like the moment I got healed. I was like look I got to tell somebody God has healed me I believe it. I'm trusting God And since then I haven't had no pain. Amen. Let's put our hands together for Jesus So Bryson now that you've received this healing after a year and a half of having this gastritis pain Doctors didn't know what to do with you. They couldn't even fully diagnose what it was now We know that there are many people who have struggled with the same kind of sickness and maybe are even here today That have something like that. What can you advise them in regards to receiving their healing? I would just say keep believing trust in God if you have thoughts if maybe you've noticed maybe you're coming today and Sickness runs in your family.  Thank you Bryson. Thank you for watching this content I hope this was a blessing to you if you're like me and you like to click on things Click on this subscribe to our channel and the content will come to you every time we post it And remember the best is yet to come