Well, back on the, so back to, so you mentioned apostolic succession as something initially it seemed to, oh, this is, you know, one of the, this is a positive, but as you get into this, this church group, you're starting to see some more of the negatives with some of these different things. Somewhere along the line, I'm guessing apostolic succession was not as important anymore, which I know this, that is a really big deal to a lot of these different church groups, right? It is. It is. Somewhere along the line is like, oh, actually, maybe this isn't as important. What changed your mind? What changed there? It wasn't that it wasn't as important. It was that it's not what the early Christians teach. That's what, yeah, see, see, the interesting thing is when I originally read the early Christians on my own, I was not convinced of apostolic succession in the way that it is taught. Of course, I didn't know what it meant. I'd heard the expression, apostolic succession, and then I see they talk about succession of bishops and all of that. And I thought, oh, well, this is maybe what it's meant. But no, then when we got around the Anglicans and the Orthodox and all that, what they mean by apostolic succession is, yeah, you aren't validly ordained unless, yeah, you've been ordained by someone who was ordained by someone who you can trace yourself all the way back to one of the apostles who ordained. And so you've got this kind of line that this, you know, chain of apostolic succession is passed through on the ordination, okay? And so you're not really validly ordained. And so therefore it's not, I don't know, the Anglicans would not say this, but the Orthodox say it's not a valid communion, you know, that you're having in your church if the minister who is presiding was not ordained to apostolic succession. But what the early church, but what they're talking about is who ordained whom. I realized it was when I was working on the dictionary, okay, so I'm starting over fresh. I go to the Antionising Fathers. I start in chronological order from the beginning, okay? And I'm just writing these quotes on a Jillian subject, you know, anything I thought was important. And, you know, since I was Anglican, I was trying to be very neutral on both from the Catholic side, small C Catholic and the Protestant side. I was, you know, just what do they say? And I was thinking of topics that were of interest to Catholic Orthodox Anglican, topics that were interested of interest to Anabaptists, to Baptists, whatever, you know, just things that would be of interest. So I had, you know, one of them was apostolic succession. So I'm looking at the quotes and I'm realizing, okay, they're not talking about who ordained whom. When they, their list of succession is a list of who followed whom in office, not who ordained whom. So like, normally, a person stayed in office till he died. So they didn't ordain their successor. You know, it doesn't have anything to do with the laying on of hands by someone who's been, you know, someone got zapped by the apostles and then they can zap the next person, that kind of thing. They're not talking about that at all.  I mean, it's like the God of the Old Testament is not the same God as the God of the New Testament and they rejected most of the books of the New Testament and stuff like that. But anyway, Jesus never came in the flesh for, you know, anyway, their teachers were saying, oh, well, yeah, I was a companion of Paul and, you know, we got this from the apostles. And so Irenaeus's response was, well, our church is, we can show the succession of the bishops that we can trace ourselves to the apostles. He's talking about the doctrine, you know, that this person got his doctrine from the apostles, and then this one got it from that guy and all of that. Yeah, where is your list? Where did you, you came from nowhere?  But he's not talking about ordination that, yeah, this made your ordination valid or invalid. It was that, yeah, you're carrying on the historical faith that's being handed down from the apostles. And it's a good argument. I mean, Irenaeus wrote about 170, 180 somewhere in there. It's a very good argument, just 70 years after the apostle John died. Now, it breaks down when you get, you know, 300, 400, 1,000, 1,500 years. Well, yeah, you're not necessarily still carrying it on. In fact, you can show very positively, you're not teaching what they taught back back then. So I saw that when I worked on the dictionary of Verde Christian beliefs that, okay, yeah, this teaching that the Catholic Church, the Orthodox, the Anglicans, that they have on Apostolic Secession, it's just, it's not what the early Christians are saying. It's, yeah, that's totally false. It's invalid. And so, yeah, so from that point, yeah, it was of no particular importance to me. Now, not everyone in our church, I had not tried to necessarily convince them. Some of them still felt fairly strong about it. And so I did not want to split the church over. You know, we had a nice group there. I mean, eventually, I guess I did make an issue of it. And it did kind of create a stir in the church. And then at that point is when we broke up, because it was like, okay, if Apostolic Secession isn't important, which it's not, and it's not even valid. I mean, I realized looking at my scroll, it's like, this is fake. I mean, it's purporting to say who ordained whom. Well, we don't even have a record. Their record is who followed whom in office. There's no record of who did the ordaining. Oh, yeah. Okay. So, and there's big gaps in the historical record that they've filled. And they've, I just realized this isn't even valid. That's so ironic, though, that you're kind of coming to terms with this, while an Anglican priest, and while you're actually writing the one book that identifies you as such, and in that process of re-going through the early church fathers, you know, the Nicene Fathers, is actually when you started re-evaluating this and saying, wait, I'm actually reading this wrong. Or like, I got this wrong. Yeah. That's fascinating to me.


Yeah, hi everyone. Yeah, so everyone can help me, right? Thanks for coming. Today I'm going to talk about as script as well as our proof that it is maximally memory hot. The paper is showing work with Joe Alvin, Kshishto Piachak, Leo Rezin, and Stefano Tsairo. As motivation for this talk and work, let us start with the setting of password hashing. To be stored securely, passwords are typically hashed, often together with a public random sort. A good question is then how to design the hash function F to prevent attackers to recover the passwords if they learn the hashes. To achieve this, we want the hash function F to be more dutifully hard. This means that should be fast enough not to slow down on its users while authenticating. But it should be slow enough to seriously impact the feasibility of a brute force attack. Traditionally, modern hardness has been expressed in terms of time complexity, but this is by now understood not to be the best choice. In particular, time complexity can vary a lot across different platforms and this is a better choice when adversaries can use some custom-made hardware like ASICs. For example, such hardware may exploit parallelism by planning to achieve massive speed-ups and have lower energy costs. Consequently, the adversaries average cost per hash evaluation can be much lower than that of honest users. Of course, I'm not defining precisely what cost is here, but ideally, we like to ensure that these costs are as close as possible. To achieve this, many recent designs have exploited observation that memory costs are largely platform-independent. This has particularly led to a notion called memory hard function or MHF for short. A memory hard function F requires large memory to be evaluated in a reasonably fast way. However, with small memory, the evaluation takes much longer. More precisely, our goal is to maximize cumulative memory complexity or CMC for short for any possibly parallelized strategy to evaluate the function F. More specifically, let T be the time needed to evaluate the function F. The CMC is defined to be the sum of memory usage over the time T. Memory hardness was a defective requirement in the recent password hashing competition, and many practical designs of password hashing schemes are indeed meant to be memory hard, including the winners, Argon2i and Argon2d. Ideally, we would like to prove that these functions are memory hard, but finding such proofs is a difficult problem. So, a good question is whether we can build provably memory hard functions. The answer is yes, and several elegant MHFs were designed and approved to have memory hardness. All these MHFs belong to the category of IMHFs, whose memory access pattern are inputs independent. Recently, however, Alvin and Blocky raised two issues regarding IMHFs. First, no IMHF can achieve optimal memory hardness. And second, many practical IMHFs are vulnerable to parallel attacks, which make them even less memory hard. Facing these issues of IMHF, we therefore ask if data dependence can help. Surprisingly, the answer is positive, and our paper gives a rigorous proof showing that the data-dependent MHF, called S-CRIPT, is indeed optimally memory hard. S-CRIPT is the very first conjecture MHF proposed by Colin Percival in 2009. It is used as a proof-of-work hash within the cryptocurrency Litecoin. Moreover, it inspired the design of one of the password-hashing competition winners, Argon2d, and it is covered by AlfC standard. The most important take-home message is that S-CRIPT is the very first example of functions with provably and optimal memory hardness, also not to mention that it is practical or ready in use and relatively simple. We emphasize that finding such proof has been a surprisingly hard problem, and previous proofs were either incorrect or restricted. About optimality, we recall that no IMHF can possibly achieve optimal memory hardness, and the proof techniques for IMHF are not enough here. Let us start the journey of exploring S-CRIPT. First, I will introduce the S-CRIPT function and the intuition of its memory hardness. Next, I will prove the optimal memory hardness and finally conclude the talk. Let me first show you how S-CRIPT works by introducing its core components called ROMIX. It is built upon a SASR20-based hash function H with output length W. However, we ignore the implementation details of H and model it as a random oracle. On input x0, ROMIX first computes a chain of values x1 to xn-1, iteratively by invoking the hash function H. Then it applies H again on xn-1 to get a value b0. In the second phase, we first interpret b0 as an integer and it computes an index c0 as b0 more n. This c0 points to one of x values. For example, suppose c0 equals 2, then this points to x2. Then the xor of b0 and x2 becomes the input to the hash function H. The output becomes the next value b1 and this defines a new index c1. Then again, if c1, for example, is n-1, we need to xor xn-1 to the states, in order to proceed in the evaluation. So on and so forth until we finally get the bn, which is the output value. ROMIX invokes the hash function H for 2n times where n is a tunable parameter. A practical parameter choice is, for example, n equals 2 to the 14 and w equals 1 kilobytes. Note that the interesting part in the evaluation of ROMIX is what happens in the second phase. In particular, the useful way to think of this is to see the synthesis as unpredictable challenges that determines which values are needed to proceed in the computation. To answer each challenge cj, we need to recover the value xcj. This will in turn allow us to learn the next challenge cj plus 1. Finally, we need to answer all challenges to complete the evaluation. This process of answering challenges is exactly what will make ROMIX memory hard and we want to abstract it a little further to understand why this is the case. More concretely, we consider a simplified setting where the challenges in the second phase, as opposed to be generated by H, are truly random and independent. This results in a game called ROMGAM that captures the essence of why is ROMIX memory hard. The game consists of n rounds and each round j, the challenger first generates and reviews a uniformly random challenge cj and the adversary is required to respond with xcj. If this answer is correct, the challenger will initiate the next round and the game terminates after all challenges have been successfully answered. The adversary's goal is to reduce its own CMC to answer all the challenges. We'll recall that CMC is the sum of memory usage over time. Let me give you some intuition about some simple possible strategies the adversary may use in this game. The simplest naive strategy answers all challenges immediately but requires large memory. Concretely, during the initialization phase, the strategy computes all x values and stores them in memory. Then upon a challenge cj, it can return the value xcj right away. Let n be the number of challenges and w be the number of bits per challenge. The strategy needs theta n time complexity and theta nw memory size. Since the CMC now is omega n square w, and just remember the value n square w is very important. Of course, we can also play the ROMGAM with small memory size, but it takes much longer to complete the game. In particular, the strategy only stores input x0. Upon each challenge, cj starts from x0 and evokes the hash function cj times to recompute the value xcj. The strategy has now a constant memory size, but expected time to answer each challenge is theta n, since the CMC is still omega n square w. Clearly, the previous two strategies are only special cases which have consistent memory usage over time. However, a strategy could be far more general, and in particular, the memory consumption can vary a lot across the computation. Concretely, to save memory, the strategy could forget some of its information and recompute the values at a later point in time. For example, just before a challenge is revealed, the adversary may store most of the x values so that it can answer the challenges quickly, but after that, it can reduce its memory consumption rapidly to minimize the CMC. But still, we would like to prove that no matter what strategy does, the area under the curve is always omega n square w. This gives us a first intuition that helps us proving memory hardness. Namely, the even general strategy answering a challenge fast requires large states. That is, to answer the challenge quickly, the initial stage should be large, whereas if a strategy only keeps the smaller data in the memory initially, it must take longer to answer the challenge. To see why this is intuitively true, let's assume that the adversary or the strategy knows p of the x values at the step right before the challenge is revealed. Given the challenge, CJ, the number of steps to answer the challenge is at least the distance from CJ to its closest preceding index i, where x i is stored. We observe that the average of such distance over the challenge is at least n over 2p, and which implies that the expected time to answer the challenge is at least n over 2p, where p is the number of x values stored initially. This holds true regardless of parallelism as the computation of the x value is inherently sequential. Unfortunately, to translate this intuition into memory hardness proof for ROMEX, we face three technical barriers. First, the adversary might store arbitrary information to answer the challenge quickly with small states. For example, it can store x of x i values or half of x i value, and this is not a hypothetical concern, as the previous work at EuroCrypt 16 showed in some wrong game, the general strategy can help actually help, and the proofs of the previous work only consider restricted strategies. Second, the single short memory time trade-off only gives us the memory lower bound at a single step, which is not enough to lower bound the CMT, as the general strategy can vary its memory consumptions or loss through the computation. In particular, given the trade-off, the previous work only shows a suboptimal CMT lower bound, and the last in ROMEX, the challenge CJ are oracle-dependent as opposed to truly random and independent. I will focus on the first two issues at the talk. For the third issue, the resolution is referred to our paper. Next, we come to the part of proving optimal memory hardness. To formalize the computation of ROMEX by an adversarial strategy, we use the parallel random oracle model proposed by Alvin and Shapinenko at stock 15. This model is very general and is used by Priv's works. The adversary first gets the initial input states X0. At each step, the adversary asks one batch of parallel queries to the oracle H. After receiving the answers, it can perform unbounded computation and update the old states into new memory states SI. Finally, it produces the output, which is meant to be the output of ROMEX on input X0. The goal of the adversary is to minimize CMC, which is a sum of states size over time. Our mainstream shows that for any other adversary evaluating ROMEX, the CMC is at least around N squared W with overwhelming probability. The forelog and loss in the term is inherent in the proof. And note, omega N squared W is clearly the best possible CMC lower bound for any construction making N queries to the underlying hash function H. As a naive strategy can just compute this by making an oracle cause and remember all oracle answers. To prove the theorem, we first show a single short memory time tradeoff to obtain lower bounds on memory. In particular, given the challenge SI, let TI be the time needed to answer the I's challenge, we show that at the step right before the challenge is revealed, the amount of memory used is inversely proportional to the time TI. That is, the green times the orange is at least omega NW. We have already seen there is a tradeoff in a special case where the adversary only stores X values in its memory. Here, we show that even if an adversary stores arbitrary information, the memory time tradeoff still holds true. More concretely, assume an adversary is first given a state Z where Z can be the result of arbitrary computation on oracle outputs. For example, it can be the pre-computation of oracles entries or XOR of XI values. And next, a uniformly random challenge C is revealed and the goal of the adversary is to recover XC and let T be the time A used to recover XC. Our goal is to lower bound the size of the states as a function of N and a time T. We emphasize that the possibility of computing H oracles which leads to small states and fast answering is not just a hypothetical concern. As the previous work shows that in some round game, the adversary can indeed use some non-trivial computation on H oracles to have small memory states and answer challenges quickly. Surprisingly, in our paper, we show that this cannot help for ad script. In particular, we prove a strong call lemma shows that for all adversary A and most oracle H, if the state size is around PW bits, then the time T is at least N over 2p with probability half. As one of our main contributions, the proof is highly non-trivial, but a high-level idea is to prove by contradiction. First, suppose time T is small for most C, that is, the adversary answers too fast for most challenges C, then the adversary on input Z must be able to output or query many XI values without querying the oracle H first. Therefore, we can argue that this enables us to compress the oracle using the state Z. Nevertheless, this cannot be true for too many H, as random oracle is incompressible. We have shown the memory time trade-off for arbitrary adversary, which also solves the first barrier that an adversary may store arbitrary information. Next, to solve the second issue that the memory usage varies a lot over time, we exploit and generalize the single-shot memory time trade-off to prove the optimal CMT lower bound for the round game. In particular, consider the execution of a general strategy and let TI be the time to answer the ICE challenge. The single-shot memory time trade-off gives us lower bounds on memory only at a step right before the change is revealed. Concretely, it tells us that memory used at this step is at least NW over 2ti. However, this doesn't give us CM's lower bounds, because the memory usage can be much different at other steps for which we don't have memory lower bounds yet. To address this, we generalize our proof of memory time trade-off to give us lower bounds at arbitrary time steps. Most specifically, consider some arbitrary points in time. We show that the memory size is also inversely proportional to the time until answering the next challenge. Since the memory usage at every time step can now also be lower bounded as functions of N and time needed to answer the next challenge. Therefore, for now, we have a memory lower bound for every time step instead of only single step for each challenge. Using this for each round I-1, we can show that the sum of memory consumption can be lower bounded as NW over 2 times the function of TI-1 and TI. And by adding these lower bounds over all rounds from 0 to MIs-1, we have that the CMC of the round game is lower bounded by the blue area, which is omega N square W. And this finishes our proof. Finally, we conclude the talk. In summary, by showing as script is maximally memory-hard, our paper gives the first optimal memory-hardness proof, which validates a practical MHF design. And also, an open problem is whether our proof techniques can be extended for organ 2D, which also shows a similar design with raw mix. This is all I want to say and thank you so much for listening. Thank you. Any questions? So in this case, I have one. Connecting your talk to the talk earlier in the day by Evgeny Dodes, what do you have to say about the non-uniform adversaries who are allowed arbitrary pre-computation? So they give compression arguments with respect to some... So they give some compression argument with something like collision-resistant one way. And our also have some also compression arguments with respect to arbitrary information. Even adversaries do arbitrary information, it takes a long time to answer it. So that's the property we'll prove. And it really has some similar ideas with respect to compression arguments. Do you have any questions? Thank you. So I think from practical security point of view, we are disappointed because we would like to see better what are the assumptions in your work in terms of the timing of memory. I mean, this month Intel is releasing a type of flash memory just 1,000 times faster than what we had before. So this happens overnight and you have cache memory. So we don't understand really what it means to be memory hard in terms of timing of the memory. So could you explain this better? Oh yeah, so first, if you only require the time, then you have to make the inputs really large. Say the input length should be n, which is not interesting. And if you require like even n minus 1 for memory, then the time you need is quadratic, which is too long. So what we can hope for is only a memory time trade-off. And so that's kind of disappointing, but that's the best we can do. And also, yeah, maybe because this, also there's some, also about the caching memory things. There's, yes, this kind of definition may not be the perfect one. And there's some new work working on a bandwidth hard on memory functions that try to model it. So we all also want to work on that side. Yeah, thank you.


Good morning ladies and gentlemen, can I please have your attention once again a very warm welcome to all of you to our second edition of The e4m India brand conclave presented by Z news and co-powered by Asian at news networks exchange for media formulated India brand conclave which focuses largely on brand marketing in India So today India brand conclave will be followed by the fifth year of the Indian marketing awards In the evening, and I hope that you all have registered for the same a quick introduction of our organizers the exchange for media group was set up in the year 2000 with the aim of publishing niche relevant and quality publications for the marketing Advertising and media professionals Today exchange for media is one stop information platform for the entire industry news views analytical information in-depth analysis of events and trend forecasting exchange for media publications have a credible and loyal following Presently the group has five titles in its portfolio Namely exchange for media.com pitch impact Realty plus and summer char for media.com Before we move forward, I would like to acknowledge and thank our partners without whom events like these is not going to be possible The second edition of India brand conclave is presented by Z news is co-powered by Asian at news network Exclusive gold partner G.E. India industrial private limited our co-partner Pitara movies world's first satellite Punjabi movies channel our gifting partner bio Are your weather organic luxury? Webcast partner 24 frames digital Ladies and gentlemen, I would now like to show and play for you our sponsors AV. Can we please have the AVs? You may not understand the rest of the bitch over there. What's going on here? Just last but not sure how to get a shot. What are you doing? What's going on here? I'm sorry, I'm sorry In the last month, more than 19 crore people have seen today. Have you seen your Z news? This is my country. This is my people. This is our fight. This is our responsibility. How can I leave it like this? Who else will raise the burden of injustice? Because when you smile, I smile. When your day passes, I also sleep peacefully. This is my country. This is my people. More than 19 crore people have seen today. Have you seen your Z news? Next, a Malayali's day begins and ends with Asiannet news. The Asiannet news network brands have stood the test of time and are leaders in high quality journalism. Asiannet news is the undisputed market leader in Malayalam news market for over two decades. The Kannada news channel Subharnan news has for over 10 years continued its leadership in the Karnataka market. Kannada Prabha, the Kannada newspaper, is the most respected and renowned for its profound impact on Kannada journalism. Republic TV has emerged as the fastest growing English news channel with a dominant market share. Indigo 91.9 has pioneered the expansion of international music in the markets of Bangalore and Goa. The Asiannet news digital platform Asiannetnews.com in Malayalam, Kannada, Tamil and Telugu and MyNation.com in English and Hindi have emerged as the fastest growing digital news platforms in India. Straight, bold and relentless is the brand promise of the Asiannet news network cheers to a new era in Indian journalism. Thanking each of our partners in contributing to Pitara Movies success story. Available on all leading DTH platforms, cable networks and with more than two lakh downloads of the Pitara Movies app globally it certainly stands tall as a leader in Punjabi movies content. Keep watching Pitara Movies for latest and exclusive blockbusters, movies and music. Ladies and gentlemen, as I said before, a lot of exciting things are going to be happening here on the stage. So do not forget to tweet and use hashtag E4M-IBC throughout the conclave. Now moving forward for our welcome speech, I would like to invite on stage an entrepreneur, a journalist, an angel investor, internet evangelist, a TV show host and media expert all rolled into one Dr. Anurag Patra. Please welcome him with a big, big round of applause. Good morning, sir. Good morning. I'm glad we're starting when it's morning and not afternoon. I see my old friend, not only a very young Partho but he's been a friend of ours for a long time. Good to meet you, Vikram. I met you for the first time but I remember your ad and that's a good thing. You know, short, crisp ad, very effective usage of media and it gets the message across so clearly you know your communication. And I welcome everyone in the room, all the speakers, all our partners from the media companies, my colleagues. Neha Panj, she used to, when we started Exchange for Media, she used to work with us. I think she was the first E4M colleague that we worked with and I met Neha today. You know, she wears yellow on Thursday. I have to take a fee on that because I wear yellow on Thursday. She's now the head of... Yes, Maharaj, I know. But I want a royalty on this, okay? This yellow thing, okay? No problem. But Maharaj, good to see you too. You hadn't come by then. So really happy to meet old colleagues and it triggers off a lot of memories. So at the end of the life is about good memories. So we are here in the second year of the India brand conclave and we've been doing the Indian marketing awards. This is technically the 17th year but in between we've given it a break so it is the sixth year of the Indian marketing awards. The Indian marketing awards we did in October 6th, 2004. That was the first Indian marketing awards. Neha, I'm sure you remember what all happened then.  We can say that when you... And in the evening in the Indian marketing awards, to contextualize the marketing landscape and what's happening in the marketing domain and to contextualize the winner's work and their business strategies, we put this together. And I can tell you that the process of the Indian marketing awards is the most robust, honest, credible process. The jury was a very high-profile jury and a relevant jury, Amit Jain, who's the MD of Loryal in India, was the jury chair. We had 14 MDs in CEOs as part of the main jury. 14 MDs and all of them showed up. I think except one person, Mahesh Guptaji couldn't come but except him, everybody showed up. So tonight's winners at the Indian marketing awards are done through a three-way process. There is a pre-jury so that the number of entries that we get can be pruned down to a certain number before being presented to the jury. So today, tonight when you see the winners, you know that there are too many marketing awards happening, too many awards happening. The only differentiator is being recognized by a peer group and second is the honesty and credibility of the process. We ensure we do both and then is the amplification. When you win an Indian marketing awards, everybody in the fraternity through exchange for media, through impact, through pitch, through business world also gets to know about the winners and the work they are doing. So when you win an Indian marketing awards, I can say that it's the biggest, most celebrated, most respected and most process-driven award. Now coming to the India brand conclave and I've always said that I grew up, not that I've grown up reading a magazine called A&M. Partho, I used to store copies of that magazine. Like you do a Playboy, I used to do A&M. I'll borrow, we can exchange. Okay, we'll exchange notes on that, right? So I used to store and the tagline of that magazine used to be business is marketing. So I'd like to talk to you about business is marketing and I am with a room full of people who know advertising, marketing, media, communication and business better than me. But I can only tell you that there is a new normal and I want to focus on three things. I keep asking this question at all our events. How many of you like Donald Trump? How many of you like Donald Trump? Like, yeah, not on Facebook but actually like, when you grow up you want to be like Donald Trump. Not even one. I think we should feed all the people. I like all of you. So I clearly, I've got my US visa so I'm not worried. I can crack Donald Trump jokes again. But why do you think Donald Trump won? Why did Donald Trump win? Why did he win? Rohan, do you know the answer? You're smiling so much, you know. So my nutritional therapist tells me an answer which is the right answer and there is a logical answer. Rachna, who is a columnist with Business World and we published her book on healthcare.  So the Americans have been eating junk food for 60 years. That's the illogical answer. But the logical answer is that he was very authentic. He came across as authentic.  He kind of brought out the worst that should be brought out in a human being and that is fear. But he was very authentic. He came across as authentic. So there is a new normal. The three things I want to talk to you about is one is being authentic, being whoever you are. I think brands need to be authentic. Brands that have authenticity at their core, whether it's in their product offering, whether it's in their communication, whether it's in their product, you know, differentiation is the brands that consumers are adopting. The second thing is digital is a tool but digital transformation is also changing the way businesses work. Let's look at mark tech. In February, soon we launched our marketing tech because we believe that most ad tech platforms, media companies are selling to media companies. There are no marketeers. At the end of the day, in our food chain, marketeers are the head of the food chain. We deploy their money. We work on their brands. So really, when we launch our marketing tech event, marketing technology is changing the way marketeers engage with brands with consumers, how they are building their businesses. So what is happening is video is becoming bigger and bigger. Audio is becoming significant because over the last few years, audios wasn't big. And I'm talking about communication. Chatbots and artificial intelligence are becoming an increasing part of what we do and we rely on insights and technologies to reach out to consumers using this tool. Machine learning is helping marketeers understand consumers better. And last but not the least, I keep saying choose your reality, AR or VR. You know, we want to experience, you know, experience is the word that most marketeers use. If you talk to marketeers, they'll tell you it's not a product. It's not a service. We're creating an experience. When you're talking of experience, AR or VR can help you enhance that experience. And last but not the least, human beings still have a role to play. When you talk of marketing, human beings, you know, we can have as much data, analytics, but at the end of the day, a human being has to take a decision. Now you can always say when you look at data and statistics, if you take decisions, those decisions can be better because they remove the human bias. There are many books around that. But at the end of the day, when you are talking of an emotional connection, you're talking of being authentic, then the human intervention becomes even more important. So as marketing technology involves, as technology involves, as the lines between what is content, what is community and what is commerce. Vikram, I'm sure you know, you're exploiting that blur. The role of human beings and marketeers is changing. The marketeers are becoming the new CTOs, the new CIOs. They're becoming the chief digital transformation officers. You have to use digital to transform your business. It has to be through every part of your business. Last but not the least, and I've said that at the last event I was at, is there are, you know, there are new stereotypes. I've seen all the Ocean 11 movies and for the first time, the Ocean 8 movie has an all-woman cast. So there is a new normal. The old stereotypes may or may not fit in. We have to create our own new normal as business owners, as brand leaders, as marketeers. And the function of marketing is to create new businesses. I mean, I am, you know, it's not because you're here, I just noticed your ad because so it communicates the offering so well. I mean, I see lots of ads. I watch three hours of television still. So I just want to say that I wish you all the best to the winners that have won tonight. I look forward to learning about marketing. Naval also told me to talk about the fact that our flagship awards, the impact person of the year, are in Bombay on the 7th of December at the Taj Santa Cruz. Tomorrow we have the exchange for media, Conclave South in Bangalore. On 15th January we have the digital forecasting we do about digital spends with Densu. So the E4M Densu AG's Network Digital Trends report is on 15th January. 16th January, you know, 16th January, again at the Taj Santa Cruz because that location seems to be very accessible for all stakeholders that come to our events. So these are announcements I wanted to make. I also am here on business world time. So I want to tell that we have a long way to go to in business world, but we've been able to become a digital business. We still have a very long way in digital there, but we've also built 15 communities like this is a community of advertising, marketing, media. The last community we launched was a community on healthcare, BW Healthcare World. On 20th and 21st December we launched our well-being community at the Imperial. Day after tomorrow we have our annual smart cities, Conclave and Summit. So we continue to segment, sub-segment the various communities in business world while maintaining the B2C corrector and the B2C audiences of business world.in and main BW. So hopefully auto is the next community with the first community next year and legal will follow. So I just want to tell you that the business world we are making stride and at some stage during the day you will see a business world heavy. So I wish you all the best and I want to reinforce that business is marketing and marketing is business. Thank you.


Hello, and welcome to our segment on special relativity. You'll recall that in our last segment on the speed of light, Michelson and Morley demonstrated that the speed of light was the same for all inertial observers. The first impact of this discovery was that the Galilean transformations that we had been using for centuries was incorrect. New transformations were needed, and these new transformations had to satisfy two key requirements. One, no matter how we add speeds, the speed of light had to come out the same, and at low speeds compared to the speed of light we had to get the Galilean transformations. In the years following Michelson-Morley's experiment, a number of physicists and mathematicians went to work on this problem. People like George Fitzgerald, Henry Ponkari, and Hendrick Lorenz. They came up with these transformations, now called the Lorenz transformations. In this segment we'll see how these transformations required that time was stretched, dilated, and distance was contracted in order to satisfy the two main requirements. And we'll also see how Einstein put it all together with just two postulates.


Water droplets can be used to effectively kill bacteria, such as escharicicoli and salmonella tifemurium, without producing harmful byproducts or requiring high temperatures. This method is more cost-effective and efficient than traditional disinfection methods, such as using chemicals or heat. The droplets are created when pure bulk water is sprayed through a nozzle with coaxial nebulizing airflow, resulting in a 98% reduction in bacteria. This article was authored by Maria T. Jule, J. Q. Lee, Allison C. Modi, and others.


We're being named the national high school athlete coaches associations coach of the year. I've had the greatest assistant coaches in my career to help me be able to stand here today. And we've also had tremendous players that have been able to buy into what we do. And I've just been surrounded by a great community, great school, great people from the bottom to the top because no one ever has success without the help of other people.


West Africa's regional bloc has urged Niger, Mali and Bokina Faso to reconsider its recent decision to withdraw from the economy community of West African states, ECOWAS. ECOWAS Commission President Omar Ali Tare said in a statement late Thursday the bloc needs to remain more unified than ever. According to Tare, there was no real basis in the reasons given by the three countries for their withdrawal.


Going on everyone Sam here with late sports cards rip in 23 tops chrome update series baseball Breakers delight 10 box case break number three pick your team style Read off the list of our names on our teams got Brandon D with the Angels Brooks E Marlins Christopher S Dodgers David Y met Socrates J with the rays gave you'll see D-backs Orioles Red Sox Greg M Tigers and Blue Jays Jason B with the Royals Jesse T Astros John Y Yankees Joshua B athletics KS Cubs Kelly S White Sox Kevin M Giants Matt S twins Matthew O Mariners Ray G Padres Rick E Cardinals Rangers Ryan B with the Phillies Rylan P Guardian Sean H Braves Tim W Brewers Todd W Reds Tyler P with the Rockies and then we also had Gary a with the Nationals and Jeff S with the Pirates. So good luck everybody. Hey, what's up Jason? Here we go. Good luck everybody breakers delights artist a sad. I'm wearing Who's ready for a debut patch? Colas rookie debut Dylan Dodd rookie and Joey Ortiz rookie We've got a Tanner, baby refractor rookie Kyle Farmer Jose Hernandez. That is a Logan Ohope debut teal to 199 For the Angels Cody Bellinger on the negative for the Cubs Got radiating rookies Bobby Miller. Nice one there. Congrats on that short print going to the Dodgers Logan Allen youth quick First auto is Matt Swarmer Matt Swarmer for the Cubs. We got an orange wave here Sean 25 Orange wave Blake Perkins 13 of 25 going to the brew crew nice one there Yeah, we will once it comes out. I don't think it's come out quite yet. I don't know it keeps getting pushed back Rossin Nice one there Blake Perkins. I don't know to be honest Yeah, these are nice man Jordan Lyles George Soriano rookie and Kenley Jansen Grayrod rookie refractor Lenny Pascantino refractor debut rookie Casey Schmidt refractor rookie That is a James Paxton for the Red Sox to 399 a Braden Shoemake to 199 for the Braves on the teal Gold Sean Murphy. Congrats on that one there, but off us Got Michael Toglia youth quake rookie Cal Stevenson refractor rookie auto to 499 for the Phillies and then Josh Lester base auto for the Orioles Josh Lester. Oh, there's no sonars in here Julian She over Shella and Juan Fenn Eric Cosmer. That was rough. Zack Neto refractor rookie Brandon Drury refractor purple Bryce Tehran on the debut to 250 Nice one here on the green blue at lava lamp is Riley green to 125 And then the teal blue lava lamp to 175 Andrew at Nardi rookie for the Marlins Youth quake James out man. This guard is still far out man. No Ken Walde chuck purple mini diamonds rookie to 299 For the A's and then Garrett Hill rookie auto for the Tigers You don't think far out. It's a dope card. It is cool. Yeah. I like that. It's pretty dope Gnarly Nardi. There we go. Hey candler, man Who are we doing? No notes have been taken for the trash list today by the way. I have no idea. I could probably fill it out right here Who's one actually I'm gonna get my It might be sold out for the evening be sold out on the trash list. Yeah early. That is Gus Varlander rookie Jesse Chavez and James Paxton Gregory Soto rookie Miguel Amaya for the Cubs Pablo Lopez Purple Taj Bradley debuted a 250 for the Rays Got a lava lamp to 175 of Tommy Pham Adley Ruchman to 250 purple for the Orioles youth quake Spencer steer rookie Blue ray wave Garrett Mitchell to 150 nice one there congrats to the brew crew good stuff brew crew and Then purple is Waldo Cabrera to 250 as well for the inks. It's one there Ryan Walker Rue Gnetto door and Andrew Monasterio Jared Schuster Where's us Waldo? Bobby Miller Casey Schmidt to 99 for the giants you get that one Matt you crying Are you crying the ground refractor nice one there on the short print congrats Rangers thought you're crying over there, dude David Peralta negative Michael Bush youth quake rookie We've got Kevin Kelly refractor rookie auto to 499 for the rays and Then a Joey Weimer base rookie auto for the He's okay worm He's fine. You're right. You're right. He is fine. You gotta deal with every night. I work here every time every time Thaddeus Ward rookie Jacob the grom refractor and Nolan Jones refractor rookie is a brewer Hicklin rookie oh and Miller and Casey legume lagumina Jeter Downs on the lava lamp to 175 God Bretton Doyle to 399 for the rules Rockies blue Sam Hilliard to 150 for the Braves Blake Perkins youth quake rookie Brendan Faw nice one there for the D-backs Congrats, Arizona stud very good. Yes And blue Corbin Carroll to 150 there we go D-backs. I Was a heavy heavy Arizona break right there Roy Grats on that. Yes, sir the rookie of the year Going to Gabriel C. Congrats Gabriel Get that into a mag for you, brother It's like walking up on a landfill To ask a Hernandez refractor Randy Vasquez rookie reason why are big I'm happy to tell you something during the next leg video thing So gross Luis gear may Shay Lingler's debut refractor rookie and Mitch Garber That's Creason Rodriguez to at 299 on the lava lamp nice one there purple or violet magenta lava lamp Got blue Zach Eflin to 150 for the race rats on that race and Brandon Williamson to 399 for them on the pink Matt Mervis youth quake rookie We've got a Teran Vovra On-card rookie auto for the Orioles and then a Matt Chapman nice one there to 50 for the Blue Jays Congrats, Toronto. I think that's going to Greg. Yes, it is there You go Greg and Matt Chapman for the Very nice Myself back in when I fell it. Oh, no That is Riley Green debut rookie Devin Williams refractor and Joey Weimer rookie debut Johnson for more dubs. Haha. Let's go. That is gonna be Garrett Mitchell rookie debut refractor Let's get a refractor of Gavin Stone and Danny Mendic Gold Ryan Yarborough to 50 for the Royals. I'm Rocky. Oh orange to 25 Congrats Guardians on the rookie Caner bibby nice one there going to the Guardians to 399 Brandon Fop Youth quake purple auto Nelson Velazquez to 250 Brats on that one at Royals and then refractor Taj Bradley to 499 on-card auto. Congrats on that Nice one there Good ol Race that's got to be trash list worthy. That's got to be trash list where they This is what the world is coming to now Bretton Doyle refractor rookie that that might have been it can there Andrew Benintendi refractor and Jake Alu refractor rookie Jose Barreiro That is a Michael Harris refractor rookie Gold Miguel Vargas youth quake to 50. Welles is on there. Steve. No views.  Yeah, Matt Reynolds negative For the Reds got Tyler Alexander yellow to 75 yellow mini diamonds for the Tigers Kevin Kelly to 250 for the Rays as a youth quake Miguel Vargas Got Israel Pineda base auto going to the Nationals Congrats Washington And then Spencer steer blue Ray wave auto to 150 Congrats at Reds He goes how Zack Neto rookie refractor debut Braden Shoemaker rookie refractor and Rich Hill or Alexander Corey Jolks refractor rookie and Sam Hillier Got a negative Nolan Jones for the Rockies on the rookie Purple Trish and Casas debut to 250 that's Blake Perkins to 199 for the brew crew on the rookie youth quake of Corey Jolks the Astros Got Logan Allen purple mini diamonds rookie auto to 299 It's up Dennis and Narciso crook Base rookie auto for the Red Sox nice one there at Red Sox All right base autos we had Narciso crook Israel Pineda Taryn Vavra Brandon Fott Joey Weimer Garrett Hill Josh Lester Matt Swarmer Cal Stevenson Kevin Kelly And Taj Bradley those were 499 at the end there Um to 250 Logan Allen or 299 right yeah 299 Logan Allen Ken Waldechuk to 250 Nelson Velazquez as Waldo Cabrera Blue to 150 Spencer steer Garrett Mitchell nice one there to 150 Matt Chapman a 50 to 25 Blake Perkins and blue Corbin Carroll to 150 true blue That'll do it for the break everybody. Thanks again for the filth up next number


Everybody forced here being 2023 tops chrome black baseball hobby 12 bucks case number 22 random teams. Good luck Let's say any 11 5 and 6 11 times names first one two three four five six seven eight nine ten 11 that's a billion peed down to Tetsuya and 11 times on the teams One two three four five six seven eight nine ten and 11 Pirates down to Tigers That's what I want to do William P. Pirates Dustin G. Blue Jays Ryan O. White Sox Eric M. Orioles Jonathan B. Cubs Joseph S. A's J. M. Dodgers Cory G. Marlins Ty W. Angels Tim W. Ray's Nats Wayne P. Reds Austin M. Guardians Edward P. Astros Nam queue with the Mariners Justin W. Diamondbacks Darren C. Red Sox Tara with the Padres Brett C. Phillies Tim W. Metz Ryan O. Rockies Tim W. Giant's Brewers Tyler H. Rangers Edward E. Yankees Adam N. With the Royals Scott F. Cardinals Ricardo has the twins and braves Tetsuya with the Tigers Let's go ahead and get started. I guess I'll refer the Ravens tonight. So same as a good boo tomorrow Honestly don't really care. I know Vaughn's gonna hop in the night So Guys really good guys really good at football All right. Good luck everybody. Thanks for the fill here Gavin Stone there a purple mini diamond to wander to 150 rays Castillo first auto the break is a Rookie Auto Michael Harris Atlanta nice ATL Michael. It's a yellow Michael. It's a yellow Michael So a Ingram has three touchdowns this year. They were all from the same game. Is that what I just saw? You did have to touch on a game didn't you? compare a rookie green Parazza rookie to 99 Yankees and a Machado And then a gold autograph rookie Michael Bush 31 to 50 for the Dodgers Jake's gonna come time Spencer out a rookie to 99 Taj Bradley Tampa Gold mini diamond of Nato 8 of 50 for the Cardinals Valdez a base rookie auto a Shea Langle ears Lingeli a Can't search it on here Coonya, there's a refractor Rocky a rookie to 499 for the 21inx to 199 excuse me for the Guardians Rock you'll base a base auto for the Mariners Luis Castillo. I wish the socks what I traded for him a few years ago This deal yeah, they almost they tried to I think in his down here. What is your a was like close to five But I'm sure the Reds are like not like yeah, we're not trading them low. No way. Yeah, they're right.  Oh, what's up jumbo? What's up jumbo? What is that you said in chat about the thumbs up? Yeah, just want to make sense. It's not a bad trade will but wouldn't make sense to do it back then Red Sox weren't that close to contending Especially since he was having a down here at the time blue refractor rookie to 75 case you should make it for the Giants Mervis yeah, I love Tiger story hunter diving over the the wall and right field at Fenway the Poppy Grand Slam Green auto rookie to 99 Zach Thompson for the Cardinals Tigers bullpen sold in that series, dude Tigers were a better team also. They're often stunk it up To be different being fair here Spencer Dude salty purple mini diamond 150 for a lander for the Mets Almost won a world series of the Tigers Justin Ferrelander Mike trout had to go to a good organization like the Astros to win it and Then an auto nest of grotesque for the Yankees Nice, Ryan.  That's cool, dude bullpen tending to Harper Super futures red autograph of J. Rod One of five there we go Here we go Mariners that is so sick rose that guy's very good at baseball. I'm calling he's gonna have a 40 70s in his career Okay, maybe 4060 All the cool announcers on the West Coast dude They're new announced the Red Sox want to win again. They got to get Don Orcillo back An MQ congrats the MQ that's fire. That's that's going that's going right here. It's going right there Can't stand that cadence Whoa What is that from Kyle's box? What he bought his own? Dude, what the dude how the like This dude is always hitting sketches. What the hell man a Blue rookie to 75 Zack Neto Angels got refractor on a rookie Michael Harris to 150 Braves ATL Michael as jumbo Diaz said Yeah, that Kylo is freaking this that is an insanely cool Camel of the Colter 86 No, but you would imagine if Richardson was healthy Jagdy to win dude, they are not an easy division AFC South a little little better than we all thought I think Green Shroud to 99 angels It's a Kylo sketch Corbin Carroll a Base auto Tori Hunter for the twins Yeah, Dax Yeah, here we go is is like Peyton Manning's Omaha like it's all so annoying Let's football I guess not their fault That's what works for them who's MVP next year Richardson hi, that's a bold take. He's a quarterback. So he's gonna be decent decent odds Probably like top 20 or 25 and odds refractor at a 199 Ricky Valdez Red Sox Next up redemption.  That's a ridiculously safe sketch That's nicer than you sketch it. I own I don't like a ton. I have some solid ones though got gunner rookie Adley on the SP image variation I want a case on those nice Adley and purple mini diamond rookie net toe to 150 for the angels Last auto of the case Is a base auto for the Dodgers of Steve Garvey Steve J rod MVP, I can see that He'll probably be top five or six and odds with the AL I would think Especially now that it was another Otani's gone. Not that Otani will win next year. Anyway, he's just gonna DH for the most part But it'll be like judge Seeger He'll be he'll be a top five. I think odds right off the gate Probably top three or four other than judge and like Seeger who else the AL would Yeah, but Jerrod has that crazy. Yeah, judge and Seeger other than those two Like I don't know to me he is gonna he's like a five-tool guy So that's like the definition of like gonna have high war if he's healthy Just for this year. Yes. Yeah, that sounds right. He was hurt for a little bit, too Rather green if he's healthy, maybe Adley Jake Rodgers number to Valdez, Rockio, Mervis, Verlander, Adley, Franco, Netto, Trout, Parasi, Adley to have a high war. I think he's still a little young and the offensive numbers might be the reason he won Taj Bradley, Josh Young, Zack Netto, Casey Schmidt, and Alon Aronato Adley could for sure.  A redemption Riley Green for the Tigers Garvey Tori Hunter, Nesta Cortez, Luis Castillo, Orioles got to be careful about like a Like a hangover from like their good season though. They got to be careful the pedal on the metal Langaliers Michael Harris Tori Hunter to 150 same with Michael Harris, Zack Thompson to 99, Gold Michael Bush, and a red J-Rod Super Futures Auto for Seattle. Lio, that'll do. Thanks again everybody. Number 23 is coming up


Let me tell you about miracle noodles and why they're awesome. These noodles really are a diet miracle. Not only are they zero calories, seriously, but they're not loaded in lectins. In fact, they're made from glucomannan starch, a starch that comes from a sweet potato-like tuber called the konjac root. Well, the fiber in these miracle noodles is prebiotic fiber. It's the stuff the good bugs in your gut use as food.  So let me tell you how to prepare shirataki noodles the Gundry way. Here's the thing about miracle noodles and the other shirataki noodles. They're a little different from regular pasta. They really do smell a little fishy at first, but rest assured, that smell goes away pretty quickly, and it's not fish, and it doesn't impact the flavor at all.  Instead, follow these simple recipes, whether you're using angel hair, fettuccine, or spaghetti. It works like a charm. So bring a pot of salted water to a boil. Now remove your noodles from the package and put them in a strainer. So you put the strainer under running water. Now if you're not in California, you can rinse these for, oh, two or three minutes, and you'll definitely notice a fishy smell. Since it's California, I'm not going to do it that long because the salted water and the boiling will take some of this process out. Okay, so we've got these noodles rinsed, and now we're going to put them in the boiling water. So we're just going to boil these for a couple minutes, and we'll cut there and I'll show you what's going to happen after we boil them. Okay, so once they're boiled, you strain them again and you put them in a dry pan. Now here's the secret.  Now the key is you don't have to use any oil, and in fact the oil at this point will ruin the process. Now you'll hear them pop and sizzle, and that's actually them drying out. The longer you do this, the more this will taste like what you think of as pasta. So that's about a minute. I could go easily for another minute. They absolutely will not burn. They will not stick. It's actually kind of fun to play with once you get used to the fact that they're not going to stick.  If you're a newbie to this, the angel hair variety is smaller and thinner and it'll dry out a lot quicker. The spaghetti is the next up. The fettuccine takes the longest. There's an epidemic sweeping this country. Some would say it's as addictive as hard drugs or even as deadly. I'll be honest. It's a pretty extreme point of view, but that doesn't mean sugar addiction isn't incredibly dangerous for your health.


Hi everyone, Joe for Jaspy's casequakes.com coming at you with a 12 team random number block randomizer Nice this knocks out. This fills up pick your team of five. There are the teams involved right there Also, if you bought a full spot, you got a chance to win two full spots Nick Smith bought both full spots.  So now let's gather these names here I'm gonna race that part of the list now. Now. Let's randomize you a number after seven times three and a four one two three four five six and Seventh and final time Michael down. Oh, it is nice. So I'll come up after this spectra break Three and a four seven times for the numbers one two three Four five six and seventh and final time. We've got zero down to nine Now remember zero gets any in all redemption for that from that list of teams Including one of one redemptions, but one still gets live one of ones. Oh But Michael has both zero and one so it's a moot point Michael There you go Ching with five Nick seven and three Michael with four Ryan with six Nick with two Johnny with eight Michael with one and Nick with nine Let's order that numerically here and we'll see you in the next video For the break itself, and I want to gather up these team names right here, too All right, so that's the list of teams for that number of lot. Thanks everybody I'll see you in the next video for the break just these case breaks calm


Megakaryocyte membrane-wrapped poly, lactic-coglycolic acid, nanoparticles, MKNPs, and chimeric human recombinant factor 8 expressing megakaryoblastic CHRF-288 cells, CHRF-wrapped nanoparticles, CHNPs, are promising vehicles for targeted cargo delivery to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, HSPCs. Both MKNPs and CHNPs efficiently targeted and were taken up by HSPCs in vitro and in vivo. This suggests that these vehicles could be used to deliver therapeutics or genetic material to HSPCs for gene therapy applications.


Now let's get into the chats. Let's see. Danny says, love your content. Small criticism, not financial advice, become impossible to watch. I would love to hear a dialogue, much more than long answers, especially from Guy. I thought I had the longest, longest answers. Thanks for keeping us informed. And then he says, just long answers. Would love more of a dialogue, maybe not three people with so similar vision. I had the same vision, I'd love to hear from others too. See, this is the problem with us, is that me, Guy, and Ben, we pretty much see things relatively the same way. They are a little bit off from me and how they invest. They're not touching anything. I think guys may be buying some Bitcoin. And Ben is too, I'm just like, I'm just buying. I'm just dollar cost averaging. I started at the full dollar cost having like two months ago, because I thought I'm never gonna make it, be right at 100% of time. So there, but the other parts like where we see like Fed rate hikes, and we see where the economy is going and there's some downfalls we think are coming forward. We agree on those things. So for that one, well, I'll talk to the guys and see if we can switch some things up a bit. I thought it would be interesting maybe like, instead of having just like questions, like one day we could just, like I could just have two co-hosts and we can go over the news and they could tell me, you know, their insights and what it means and then can pull up some charts and things like that. Maybe that would be it. I don't know. So we'll see. So good comments. Danny says, why does somebody who rents an extra nickname? You know, it's because I made everybody administrators.  And then it just cleans up the chats really nicely instead of having like people going, you know, investor Janet Reno is the best. Find her on Telegram at blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, really? Ah, biggie. Dan on Twitter, that's me. Beardy says, don't sell until the bull run. Beardy is talking about his EOS holdings.  Robby still DCing into ADA? Yeah, I'm DCing into Bitcoin, Ethereum, Avalanche, near ADA, Chainlink, some other stuff, I forget. But yeah, either every day or once a week. And that's it. Andrew's got a good point. See, that's why I don't like to do Q&A so much, more like just the points and balance off them. We don't need banks to custody Bitcoin. We must do it ourselves. They will manipulate the price to do with gold. And that's it. They're holding paper Bitcoin. And this is the same problem, this is the same problem that happened with FTX. FTX was supposed to hold a billion dollars worth of Bitcoin and then they figured out once they, you know, figured out it was insolvent. And it was a scheme that they only bought like roughly a million dollars worth of Bitcoin. And my question was this, well, if they would have kept buying Bitcoin like they were supposed to with their customers money, where will we have been? Maybe that 100,000 Bitcoin price prediction I had would have actually worked. Who knows? But I have no idea. But yeah, you can have all the major banks and this Deutsche Bank, no, sorry, not Deutsche Bank. Credit Suisse. Let's get those two confused. I don't know why. They were doing some shady things anyhow. They've had multiple reprimands and they've had multiple fines and spoofing of metals and things like that, just like Chase Bank.  So yeah, it's important that we hold it because we're the only ones that can say, yes, I have it, it's not just paper Bitcoin which is irrelevant anyhow. Neem says we're going mainstream. I have to agree. I mean, especially after yesterday's video on this one today, I can see it. Which the US government would get it. We're not all at George. Please look on the Epicash, not on security. Dibsie says we've been in one depression next. Maybe, who knows? There's a very scary chart out there which takes a look at the only time that we have a retraction of money, which just happened. We get a depression, great depression and that just happened like a month ago. So if you want to scare yourself, you can look at that. Will Europeans ever be able to retire? I don't know, but there's a bunch of civil unrest going on in France right now on that very subject. So hopefully at some point. Lawson City, you grow, I grow. It says, Dan, it takes a lot of guts to admit you were wrong and could be wrong. That's why I'm here. Sometimes, but I've been doing it my entire life. So it's actually second nature.  I mean, I learned this very critical skill in the army.  So that's just why it's very easy for me to say it. Let's see. Rookie numbers on the likes. That's right, I'm not your dad. You guys can do what you want to. That's right. So Mira says, we will go to that one currency, CBDC. I gotta tell you, I was always under the impression that people are smart enough to figure it out with CBDCs and we wouldn't go that route. And then with Governor DeSantis coming out and having that press conference saying, we don't want CBDCs and then Senator Ted Cruz from Texas saying, we need to eliminate CBDCs and not make them happen. Even as all that happens, there's a great video from Simon Dixon and he just lays it out, he goes, look, they're inevitable and they're gonna happen. And before you say, well, Simon Dixon is obviously a government shill, well, he's not. He's a Bitcoin OG and has been on the channel many a time and he's just like, look, it's inevitable that it's going to happen and we just need to prepare for it. And that's why I need to teach everybody as much as we can about the digital asset, crypto space and about self custody. It's not so much about having your Bitcoin and putting on a platform and gaining yield off of it, right? We need to actually say, no, no, no, we need to custody that because that is mine and we don't wanna have fractional reserve banking and whatever you're doing with my Bitcoin to dilute the value of it. And that's the big thing. So I think that's why I'll be here for quite a while. Ah, let's see. Hello, everybody. We are losing our freedoms on the CBDC, just another step. It could be like the digital you want or it could be, you know, like Giancarlo says that he thinks that we can have a digital dollar and still remain private. I think he is wrong, but hopefully. But yeah, it's gonna happen. Let's just accept that. That's okay. The CBDCs happen and then we have that and this is the great thing about the CBDCs is that it only takes one time.  It only takes that one time. For that to happen to somebody because that one person tells 10 and 10 tells 100 and 100 tells thousands. And that's where things just explode. Here's a prime example. What happens the last two weeks when all the banks collapsed? Not all the banks, but we had a couple, you know, one bank collapsed and we had Silvergate, Signature and Silicon Valley Bank and now we have Swiss Bank. All those banks that are starting to collapse which I think there's more on the horizon. What happened? Well, everybody started to talk. You know what's great about the internet age is that it just takes very one person to send a tweet or an Instagram post or TikTok or whatever.  I've had so many people call me or text me and say, hey, where should I put my money because now I'm scared that I won't be able to get it back out. I'm like, well, yeah. So again, it worked out pretty well with the banks. I think this fraction reserve that they're doing or fraction reserve lending, it can only last for so long in this digital age. And then with the CBDC, if it comes down to and they start to control people all they got to say is, well, I thought it was cool until it wasn't. It's a good thing that I know this guy named Rob and he got this show and he talks about the Bitcoin where I can opt out. Well, maybe I'll just do that. It's inevitable. It's right, right? I mean, am I off of that one? Just seems very, it's quite simple. Anyhow, Aristotle says, Rob, I do my own research and get more and more confused about everything. Me too, I must be honest. You know, like that article I talked about that Forbes, the top five banks in the country, they came out and Silicon Valley Bank was like, in top one, how many people did due diligence on that article? How many people did due diligence on FTX? How many people did due diligence on those banks? Just investors and people who bought stock in those publicly traded companies. How many people did that? They didn't get it right. So I think that the people who scare me are the people who are 100% sure of themselves.  I really do think that there should be some part of us that's like, well, I don't know about that because that doesn't make sense or I don't know the whole story. An example would be like, you can look at 30 different data points on one thing and then all of a sudden you look at this one data point that totally invalidates your whole thesis. How many times have you watched the History Channel and that's happened to people like that? So for me, I'm just like, well, I don't know where things are going but I know if I stick around for the long haul I should be okay. And I try to pick the best products I possibly can. I'm gonna get things wrong but that's okay because I don't have to have 20 winners. I just have to have one or two that skyrocket. Same thing with the internet age.  Well, if you just had a little Google, you had a little Amazon, it worked out okay. Okay. Hey, Rob, when Flappy launched at a Twitter website, we're going with that right now. We already have the web two developed. The game is ready to go. We're just waiting for Apple to give us the approval. That's the easy part. And the web three is 80% done. So we're trying to get it out in May then maybe June, so everything's there but it's gonna be different how we do it. It's not gonna be heavy on tokens. It's gonna be, they're gonna be NFTs for power-ups and all of that but it's gonna be a very simple game and we're gonna have a product before we do anything. That's the secret. Like a real secret. Now that's a good question. AirDrop for subscribers. Yeah, I probably should do that. It's a good one. Ah. PHX, that's a great question. Fantastico. So the question is, what are those listed rules mean? Great question. So I made these during right around the time of the Celsius collapse and I really started to harp on them right before the Voyager collapse. And there's five rules and most of you know this so you can just tune this out. It's all gone. Meaning everything you invest is probably all gone anyhow. That's your mentality you should have. So what does that mean? Don't invest more than you can afford to lose. If you have a mortgage and your house costs $2,000 a month and you make $3,000 a month or whatever you're making, don't spend $3,000 a month in crypto.  Maybe five bucks, 10 bucks, I don't know. But it's all gone. Don't invest more than you can afford to lose. Everything's a scam until per otherwise. Even if you're here for me, it's probably a scam. Just say it's a scam until per otherwise. Verify, don't trust. Nothing gets left on exchanges, zero. So you can buy and sit them on there. And I know there's different places where people who are traders who wanna have their fill orders put in. That's fine. But the best way, nothing on exchanges. Put them on your cold storage device. You can use the exchanges, right? But just pull them off. No leverage. I'm sick of hearing about the people who use 50 to 100 X leverage and don't make it. I'm tired. I get those emails weekly. There's a caveat to that too. If you wanna use like a two or three X leverage, you have at it, not your dad. But for me, I don't use leverage because I think it's a little risky, especially at 1500 X. You might as well just, you're playing with fire. The last one, take profits. Meaning nobody, everyone broke taking profits. I'm pretty sure that in the last bull run, I'm pretty sure everybody here thought that they could probably take a little more profits during that time. That's really it. That's my rules. Mike Bennett, everybody's always wrong. Yeah. Martin Nell says, isn't AI just gonna disrupt all this? Ah, maybe. I think Simon Dixon said it. He said, we're going to have an AI algorithm or artificial intelligence which will dictate what and how much of the CBDCs are actually put out and who gets what. At the right flow at the right time. Scary, right? So AI to disrupt this, maybe it'll come with a better idea. Who knows? Do you think Tether will collapse eventually? I've had my fears on Tether for quite some time, but again, wrong because which one of the stable coins lost their pig so far? Luna? USDC? I want to say BUSD? A little bit. Tether? Nope. So I'm not saying to put everything in Tether. I'm just saying, just giving you a little history that Tether's so far so good. Oh, excellent. You grow. If you want more recent mortgage data, check out Black Knight Mortgage Data. Use it for Zephanie and Freddie Mac. Charter only 30 is excellent. I will definitely do that. Black Knight, got it. Two EO should cover retirement. Yep. RS is one of the last golden grabbers, look great. That game is that you can get an early rush or get an early alpha and play it, but I believe they're putting the public game out in August or September. Things changed a little bit over there, but they did pretty good. They had a great launch and I wish them the best. Let's see. Guy is a doomer. He was great though. I think Guy's pretty upbeat, quite honestly.  So I think it's a little bit more difficult. Like here, like in the States, like we don't see it as bad. Like I just, I'm like, wow, the eggs are, the eggs are priced pretty good. So inflation's not too bad. Like here in Puerto Rico, you know, prices are always high and gas for the leader is actually down. So I'm like, that's pretty good. But no, Guy, I think Guy's middle of the road pretty even keel, keel.  We're on the scenes, Ben's like, yeah, we're gonna go pretty far. There's still things gonna happen the next six months and I gotta agree with him. Do you think with NASDAQ and German bank that crypto could have an early start of a bull run? I think what it would be, I think that would be a nice kickoff but I think what would really happen is if we start to see, I hate to say this, but more bank failures, which will give more attention to alternative investments such as Bitcoin and digital assets, mostly Bitcoin though, because that's what people kind of feel it is for. And then I gotta tell you, we might have a little mini bull run for the next FOMC meeting. If Drone Powell doesn't, if he just says, okay, no rate hikes this time round. If we see that, we could see a little bit of a bounce but I don't know about a bull run bull run. There's too many factors out there that inflation is too high. People are still concerned about that and we'll see. But again, the economy doesn't bounce back first. It's equities that bounce back first then the economy follows. There you go. Me and Barry doing a joint stream one day. Now that would be good. We call it EOS brothers. And then we would just talk about EOS for like two hours straight. EOS won't make it on the next phone.   I have all my money in EOS. I'm just kidding. Let's see. Eric Murphy says, what's up, Brock? Question, do you think crypto IRAs that are using Coinbase are in trouble due to the SEC's attack on Coinbase? We talked about this in depth yesterday about what the SEC might be looking at. And again, we went back with Simon Dixon and he pretty much said, he's like, look, he goes, both sides are not telling the full story. Coinbase isn't telling the full story. And he does the SEC. And he talked about how the different license that they have and how they're supposed to onboard their customers are supposed to be done and how they're actually doing it. And, you know, how also the SEC is not approving anything and how they are actually sending a little bit of guidance but they're not approving squat. So he goes, everybody's not telling the full truth. So that's why I said, we have to go to war with them in a legal process and they have to be sued. And I'm glad that as well as most got served to Coinbase and now we can get this all figured out. I don't like to drag things out. And I gotta tell you if the Fed would have, you know, just come out on fire earlier and raise rates higher quicker, we wouldn't be in this mess right now.  And we're kind of in the low, but, you know, we're recovering.  Yeah, it's a good question. Whatever did happen to something pump days. I'd like to see that. Watto, enjoy your videos. My question is a content creator. How do you manage viewer retention? Probably the toughest part right there is when you're trying to get people to stick around, it's, well, there's two things. First of all, you have to find, you know, how you do things and how your voice is, because I don't sound like Altcoin Daily. And Altcoin Daily doesn't sound like Hashoshi and, you know, vice versa. And Ben doesn't sound like any of us. So like in this one, you just have to find the way that you do things and then try to make it as interesting as possible. And I always try to condense it as much as I can. Before I was doing like, like this is a long video because we're doing Q and A. I try to keep things short and sweet as best I can, give my opinions and get out. That's the best I can tell you. Let's see. Deutsche Bank in trouble. Sorry, it was Credit Suisse, excuse me. Rob, do you think AI will take over crypto for human chance to realize what's happening? No, I think AI will take over other industries before then. And I'm just more concerned about these deep fake videos. I mean, how easy would it be for them to do President Zelensky to come out and say, hey, Russia, we're sorry and we surrender and everybody lay their weapons down. And it looks just like Zelensky sounds just like Zelensky and everything else. I would cause some problems. Why buy Bitcoin at 27K when you can wait and buy it a million? That's true. Danny's got a good point. There's an old adage, selling may and go away. I learned it from you, Rob. I gotta tell you, if this recession comes in when people think it is, it'll be the most accurate time I've ever heard of it because everybody is saying that this recession is gonna kick off brutally in Q3. So, you know, looking at end of June and early July, that's the truth. Then selling a may would have been pretty great deal. I personally, I probably won't, well, we'll see actually. Can't say anything. I'm just gonna look at some data. You probably think Alaska will do the state or the game. The state, I think does fine. The game itself probably do pretty well. It's got great graphics and the people really believe in the project. Let's see. And I think we're coming up on that. That's a great question. It's a great question. What will the bank do that exchanges won't? You know what they'll do that exchanges won't do? Name recognition. Here's it. Here's what we have. You can go to an exchange right now and buy crypto because we've done that before. It's no problems. Now talk to the normies, the people who've never done it. And they say, I wanna buy some crypto. Okay, we wanna go in exchange now because I heard about FTX and what happened there. I don't wanna do that. Or I heard about this thing called BlockFi or Celsius or Voyager. So I don't wanna lose all my crypto. I wanna, I'd like to get in some way. Okay, well also Wells Fargo is offering this to you and Chase Bank, JP Morgan, Fidelity, whatever. Oh, I don't know. But they're not FTX, are they? I trust them. That's the only thing they can do different. It's name recognition and trust. And if you can do that, then you can get a lot of people going, well, okay. All these guys have my, they've charged me overdraft fees for so long. I trust them. That's the mentality, man. I know, so that's it. Yeah, Brandon McNamara's got a good one. Say a script, say a script.  And I bought a nice condo here in the Caribbean for my parents. So thank you. Have you heard of Vulcan blockchain yet? I've heard of it. Not really sure. I haven't gotten any of it though. It's a great. So what's your thoughts on Peter Thiel selling his crypto on Bitcoin? You understand, this is a great thing. There was a story we covered about a month and a half ago. And when Peter Thiel was talking at Bitcoin Miami, he was talking about how great Bitcoin is and how it's the future and how he really believes in it. And just three weeks or a month beforehand, his investing company sold, I don't know if it's all or most. Most are all of it. It was a pretty good trade actually for that timeframe. And if you pinned down Peter Thiel and ask him, hey, I thought you said that you believe in it. He's like, well, I believe in it, but it was just overheated and I sold it. So that's what you gotta understand. So all the people that you listen to out there in the crypto verse, then they say, I believe in it and it's gonna be the greatest thing.  And how much are you dumping on me? Just remember that Peter Thiel and who knows how many other ones that are out there. And the only reason we know Peter Thiel did it is cause I think it was a public and traded company, but I could be wrong on that one, but yeah, he sold a bunch of it, almost all of it. It's not surprising to me. It's just, I've been here for so long, I just like, well, it makes sense. Hey, Rob, what do you think about other M2? Move to earn products like without sweat, for example, Steppen and Fitfi. Well, I have Steppen, I actually have it on my phone. There's that one and then there's Satoshi Miles or called Smiles. And that is a free app that you use it, you download it, you walk and it gives you Satoshis. Pretty cool, right? But just know, I don't know if they sell your data. I can't tell you for sure if they do or don't, they're probably say they don't, but just like how when you came into YouTube, you probably saw an ad, you'll see some ads and they'll sell you some stuff and that's it. But it's a pretty good trade-off just to stick on your phone, walk around and get Satoshis.  Meme says, in my opinion, there is a silver lining after CBDC is our reality. People will be more comfortable with Bitcoin and crypto, that's a good, I never thought of it that way. Yeah, it's true. You know what would be interesting? And I think that's true because people, like they're not really used to having wallets on their phone per se, but they're used to like a Venmo, a cash app and a PayPal. So when they can kind of look at this and go, well, that's my whole thing and I can push it this way or that way. When they take a look at CBDCs and they move things around, maybe it won't be such of a big deal when they have hot wallets like a MetaMask. Or something else. So yeah, that's a good point. That's the point.  Again, I think that'll probably happen. But it only takes one time for things to collapse.   That's how I see it. ACA, Bloomberg, Verity gives the thumbs up. My life is complete. I cannot type. No, that was fine. Gary says, pretty new to staking. What's the rule of thumb when collecting your rewards? Daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, what's the norm in Europe? So it depends on the product. Like for me, so it pretty much just comes automatically. I know like with the Cardano Steak Pool, again, shameless plug, link in the description. Like we don't touch anything. The Steak Pool operators don't do anything. It's all done behind the scenes and you get it into your wallet, whether that be a Daedalus or Yoroi or Adalite or Nami or whatever you want to do. Every five days you get those rewards. Near protocol is pretty much the same thing. It just kind of gives you automatically polka dots.  Like with Gensokishi, you put them in, you're staking and then it adds up and then you get it. I just, whenever I can remember, honestly, just go from there. Yeah, when she's social classes goes away and everyone can look at each other the same. That would be nice. We'll see. Ledger is the best. That's what I'm gonna get. I miss anything. 100X made 10 bucks though. Thank you. That's a good question. Charles says, for someone, seniors at issues with using Ledger, how save or unsave other wallets such as Exodus. Exodus, is that a, if it's a hot wallet, first of all, Charles, go to the, there's a website. Dan teaches crypto, 100% free. And I talk about the difference between a cold storage wallet and a hot wallet. Exodus, I thought was a hot wallet because you're connected to the internet. I could be wrong, correct me in there, but anytime you have a hot wallet, it's a little bit more dangerous, I guess you could say, than a cold storage where you have nothing connected to the internet, where it's a very, it's a, not possible, I'm sure everything's possible, very tough to hack. So Exodus, this is how I see it.  I had it. So I talked about this card before, Arculus, right? And it's kind of like a hybrid between a cold and a hot storage wallet. I have my MetaMask wallet in here, and I also have my Nano Ledger, and I got all this stuff right here. So it's just like a bank, right?  That's how I see both of these things. I think that's the best way to look at it. How do I convince my girlfriend to invest in crypto? Eric, you don't. You just don't. You can talk to her about it, but at some point she'll come away. And the reason why I say that is because I've had other people who have said, my wife, my girlfriend, my husband is going to kill me because I told them to get into Bitcoin at $69,000 or a theorem at $5,500, whatever it also was. And I'm like, ew. So for me, I just say, look, if you want to learn about it, that's cool. I'm not going to push you.  The last thing that's thought on a CBDC peg to a $32 trillion deficit? America, baby. America. We're going to increase that debt ceiling. Don't you worry. That's the only time Congress can actually get together and agree on something. Ha ha. Yeah, guys are realists. I gotta agree.  I don't hate him. I just think he's, here's a plot twist. Maybe Gary Gensler just wants to usher in Bitcoin this whole time. Maybe he knew that Coinbase would never sue him and the SEC.  I got to push their hand because I want to make sure everybody gets Bitcoin. So I'm going to sue them and we'll eventually lose the case and I can usher in Bitcoin behind the scenes. Fade to black. I know. It's a pretty good idea, right? Maybe not. Okay. Renzo, this is a great question. Next administration will be crypto friendly. I think this is it. This will be the last one. Yeah, I don't see the Democrats winning this next election. I don't. We've already flipped that we, I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I just kind of vote for the best person. The house has already been flipped. So, you know, it's Republican controlled Senate. I think it's a narrow. Is it still a narrow? Yeah, I think it's, well, let's see. I think it's still 50-50 with the VP cutting the tie. It's in control, whatever.  I don't see them winning. So if they get out, then depends on who the next person comes in. If Trump runs again, he's not very, he's not very crypto pro-ponent of that, we'll say that. If you've got something like DeSantis, sure, but some people hate DeSantis and some people don't want to win, all right? But I think there's more people on the Republican side that are more pro-crypto than there are on the Democratic side. I think Elizabeth Warren is the far left for crypto, we'll say. So yeah, if they just depends on who's in office, I am real, unlike this green screen back here. Exactly. Matter of fact, I'll be traveling next week. So you, and then we'll be back in Texas around April 1st. So expect a new green screen. What did I miss? I'm gonna give you opportunity to watch it right now. Everybody, that's it for today, we've got 52 minutes. So look, thanks for hanging out with me. Almost 2,000 people just hanging around, that's great. If just need a favor, like today's video, thumbs up, just consider subscribing, all that great stuff and that is it. Also, if you're in the Puerto Rico area, tomorrow morning we'll be going to Amigos de los Animales to walk the shelter dogs at eight in the morning. It's a beautiful scenic walk and of course the shelter dogs get out and I always post about that on Twitter and the address and everything else. We go from eight o'clock to around nine, nine, 30 and I buy everybody breakfast. So if you wanna stop by and do something good, hang out with me for a bit, great. See you tomorrow morning, eight in the morning. If not, I'll see you for tomorrow's video but that's it for today. So thanks so much everybody. See you on the next one. Adios.