I'm Adrian Boatman and here today to talk to you about the ARDC Open Call for Projects and in particular to programs in that call of transformative data collections and the institutional role in data coins. Okay, down to our content. To get straight to the concrete of what are we talking about, it's an Open Call for Projects in these two areas. One area called Transformation Collections and another area called Role of Institution in Data Commons. Very practical, offering up to $50,000 per project. The project should be completed in September. We're open right now for applications and that will close on the 1st of May. In total, we'll be investing about $2.1 million in this, it's available for the call. The spirit of the call is short, as you can see, to three month projects perhaps, to do something in these two areas and for us to learn from that and share those learnings. I'll get back to more details about what that means. Anyway, they really inform our future directions and we've got some summits and other kind of roundtables and meetings further in the year. So that's in a nutshell what we're talking about. Perhaps we should get a little bit of the context. Let me just remind you that these slides and this recording will also be shared after the presentation as well as the questions will be formally shared on our FAQ. The context for this programme of work is the context of the ARDC activities over the last year and moving into next year. At the top there you can see, at the end of last year, we were very active in a whole set of public consultation. A lot of you on the call today were probably involved in some of that public consultation. We went to each of the state capitals. We interviewed some of the big national research infrastructure facilities. We did a lot of outreach there to get feedback from the community about some of the strategic directions of the ARDC. Those who are watching our website and I encourage you all to do that will have seen in the just in the last week or so. We've posted a number of documents that outline some of those strategic directions. That's what we've been doing over the last couple of months is clarifying those strategic directions with our board, with the department, some of those high level strategy. Let's now settle in that sense on our website and we will be consulting further of course and refining that as part of continuous improvement. However, having established those directions now, we're thinking about, if you look at the purple box that says in quarter one, here we are, we've done the strategic directions. We think that the new programs will start later in 2019 and then into the outer years. Between here and there we've got two pieces of work that we want to do, these discovery activities and a set of summits. The discovery activities are projects like the ones that we're talking about today that answer questions or stimulate activity in areas that we want new programs in. We want your experience or feedback or some examples and that's why we're doing these discovery activities. So they're meant to be small, lots inclusive to get our partners and stakeholders involved in developing our new programs, the bigger and larger substantial pieces of work that will begin towards the end of this year. After the discovery activities we want to bring people together in a number of summits or brown tables or events to discuss some of those directions. And all that leading to those new programs that obviously will kick off towards the end of this year and into the business plans of coming years. Just a little note underneath there at the bottom you can see whilst all this new stuff is going on, we are committed to service continuity. So all the events and support and services infrastructure that you've been accustomed to receive from ARDC and its predecessor organizations are continuing those on refining them in light of the strategic direction and they will so we can continue to do stuff in the meantime and they will benefit obviously from this consultation and support the new programs into the future as well. Alright, so just to now have a look at what those strategic directions are is that this is all part of the background to these projects that we're talking about today. I encourage you to have a look at our website and some of those strategy documents. In a nutshell, the ARDC is transforming digital infrastructure to support leading edge research. We have a number of strategic themes, areas of activity, data and services, storage and compute, coordination and coherence, software and platforms, people and policy. And together we're trying to work with the whole sector to build Australia's research data commons which is again much bigger than any of our own activities and involves the whole sector. So that's in a nutshell what those strategic directions were about and there's more detail on our website. So given those strategic directions now, what are the particular discovery activities that we're thinking of? For the moment we have two confirmed sort of portfolios and a set of others that we're under consideration. So the first one, these data and services, that's what we're talking about today. You will have seen there's a computer and storage set of discovery activities which really focuses on 11 question areas. And we're considering other discovery activities in the other areas of that strategy that we talked about there. So software and platforms, coordination, cohesion, people, policy and other stuff. So the first one is what is the subject matter of today's webinar. If you're also interested in computing storage then come back for another webinar on the 18th of April. And if you're interested in any of the other areas then stay tuned and there will be some ways of keeping in touch at the end of this presentation. But don't tune out now. This is the key activity for now is this data and services. Step back slightly, so why did Darten figure so prominently in the strategic directions of the ARBC? We see that it is a key way for us to really benefit the whole research system because we are a national infrastructure provider. In two ways, can increase research innovation through these significant data collections that drive new research over the next decade. So for example, a longitudinal study in a particular discipline area could actually be the powerhouse of research innovation for a number of years to come. So that key role that we see data being able to play at a national system level is around research innovation. It's also improving this idea of research integrity. So how would I reproduce the findings or the conclusions? How would I test or see for myself or adapt the conclusions of previous research? And for that we think a pervasive sector wide data arrangements that ensure the persistence of all the things that underpin journal articles and other research findings. That is a very good contribution that data can make to the whole national research system. So that's just a step right back as to why we're doing this within the context of the research system. And you should keep that in mind that that's our overall goal for those long-term activities and the two programs we have today actually line up with those longitudinal objectives. All right, so let's talk about those. So now that was all background. There will be more details about probably why you've come here today, but that's part of what we have a webinar to give you an idea of all the stuff that you don't see on the page, on the website. So the first program is called transformative collections. What are we trying to do here? We're trying to help to either establish or develop or improve the sustainability of an existing significant data collection. And as we said, these are the kind of collections that will drive innovation in Australian research. What is this category of these transformative collections and why is ARDC again interested? These are the kind of collections that enjoys strong community support. They have a scope which is clearly beyond a single institution and it's very clear that they drive and enable research. This is obviously not all the data in Australia. It's a particular category that we're focusing in on for those strategic objectives that I talked about before. Now, why those three things are important? If they don't enjoy strong community support, then we're not going to be interested if the community is not. If they're not clearly beyond the single institution, then that's not national infrastructure. So although it's very important that we come into a different kind of infrastructure that we would not necessarily be involved in. And for this particular objective, remember, I had that objective where we wanted to increase research innovation. If the collection can show that it's really driving a whole research program into the future, then that's the kind of collection that will help us to deliver on that desire to increase innovation in Australian research. So if that's the category, then we're interested. Now, the kind of things that we're talking about, I said, so that's, you know, and we will be interested for years to come. In this particular set of activities over the next little while, which are discovery activities, you're relatively short. What are the kinds of things we're talking about? Well, if you have an activity over the next two or three months that can show how you build or sustain a community ownership of these collections, then that's an activity that we'd be interested in partnering with you on. The content strategy. So what we mean by that is this is a longitudinal study. You know, what is the content of this collection that will help to drive research? For example, standardisation obviously makes that new collection that much more valuable as it can be hooked into discipline standards, discipline standard concepts, technical standards that apply in your particular area. All these things are going to make this transformative collection that much more transformative. And then we're very interested in these ideas of sustainability. What are the key things there is how do you get the knowledge of the institution involved with it? So there are the areas of activity that are open for funding. So what are we expecting out of you if you apply for one of these projects?  This is not an academic exercise. We want you to do something for a particular transformative collection. This could be, and here are some examples. These are examples only that are given. But you could do something in the next three months. Formalise a leadership for a group for a collection that doesn't yet exist or exists, but hasn't been embedded in the community. You could perform an audit, do something with a standard. You could transform some data and aggregate it. Add an access interface to find good practice for something which could be a distributed national collection where open to all sorts of things and there's more details on the website or in the types of examples of activity. So that's the first thing. You've got to do something and it's going to be valuable. It's going to be in those areas that we identified. You will have to share the learnings of those. We have some kind of report that will say, okay, given that you did something for that collection, what did we all learn about the issues enablers? What kind of code did you use? Could that be reused by others? What methodology did you take about in order to do this? And can that be used by others in your area or others in other areas doing some of things? And we'll ask you to present at the summit or other events. And that's the summit which is tentatively scheduled for September 17th. Program 2. It's the second program of activity in this area. Institutional role in the data commons. What are we trying to do here? The key thing we're looking at is how would you enable all these other research outputs such as data, software models, materials? How would you allow them to be captured and managed in a systematic way in order to, for that research integrity and reproducibility objective that we were talking about? And if you think about it, that's not necessarily a centralized ARDC national infrastructure, but it is a national system. And that's where we believe that the institutions can play a critical role in this national data system. If we can somehow ensure the persistence of all these underpinnings of the research conclusions. So that's a much broader kind of almost a safety net thing that we want to have in place as part of a national system. It's potentially a little bit more than what an institution would do just as part of its business as usual. And in doing this immediate good project, it would be maintaining those materials, perhaps making them fairer, findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable for the greater good of science and research system beyond the project. So they're the kind of areas where we're looking to see what is the role of an institution in this idea of data commerce. The more pragmatically what we mean by that, fundable areas here would include changes to data, infrastructure policies and procedure that support better research, sensitive data is a big challenge at the moment, so we've identified that as one of the key areas. It doesn't have to be sensitive data, but we've identified it there so that activities in that area can be prioritized. And then this whole idea of how does an institution linking to national discipline and other international systems. So what kind of deliverables there? Again here it's a three-part theme. We would like to see how you can demonstrate how your institution can go that extra mile and actually play a role in the data commerce. So that's something potentially a little bit more than what might be required just to do the research and going an extra mile perhaps to make more data fair through changes to your policies infrastructure procedure, improve the fairness of sensitive data or integrate into national and more global systems. We will ask you to share those links as in the other program and also to present at the same data summit in September 17th, which is a tentative day. All right. There's a particular note I just want to make about this second program. It's only the second program, the institution role in the data commerce. We've got some rules here. The eligibility is only for a higher education because it's an institution role. So we're talking about institutions. The way we're using that to define that is the higher education support act. There's a list of providers, higher education providers. That's the list that we'll be using for institutions. Also those for Commonwealth funded research agencies. There's another rule there that will take one project per institution. Part of what we're doing here, as I said, was to stimulate activity across the sector to really make this a system-wide thing. So we'll be encouraging activity from a broad range of institutions. So we'll take one from each. Why? Again, remember the objective here where we are trying to explore what the foundation role of a long-lived institution can be in the persistence of these outputs of research. And also we've been back into the first program, the role that I have in some of these long-lived collections as well. So we really are actually trying to stimulate institutions. That's what we're working. But you should note, the other program has no such element of the criteria, and nor do the other discovery activity programs that I talked about earlier. Right, two more things you should just keep in mind. The ARDC is funded under the National Research Infrastructure Program. The Chief Scientist did a review, and this is what he says National Research Infrastructure is. It's these nationally significant assets, facilities and services that support leading-edge research. So if you want your sort of application to resonate with us, then you have to understand what box we're working in. So for example, in the first program around collections, I could see how they would be nationally significant assets, particularly if they're beyond the remit of any particular institution or where they go beyond. Then the ARDC would see, yes, we do have a role there to support that kind of infrastructure. And then remember the second part? That's where I was getting to why did we want collections that were specifically aimed at creating new types of research. Well, that's because as a research infrastructure program in Encriss, and we are required to support leading-edge research. What does this mean for the institutional program? It's interesting. I think ARDC is probably one of the most out there and interesting national infrastructures where we see the data comedies as this new nationally significant asset facility and service that will really help to support leading-edge research, and it's a national system. So that's why we're stimulating activity in the institutions to see how they can support that. But you'll need to take into account that obviously if you propose something to us that looks like it's just a change to your own institutional infrastructure for your own purposes, then it won't resonate that highly with us. If you can show us how your institution is contributing to that national system, the examples I gave there was by making your data fair and available to this national system for integrity, reproducibility, innovation, etc. Then that will align with our very broad idea of this research data commons as a national infrastructure. One last note. So what if we have these leading-edge research infrastructures? Why would Joe Logs be interested? Why would Joe Citizen be interested? On the left here, this is another diagram from the National Infrastructure roadmap. On the left you can see this cycle here which is really talking about how research infrastructure and research institutions and world-class universities and industry work together to make a really good research system and that's what we've been talking about here. How to get better efficiency, integrity and innovation into the research sector. And that's what all these arrows are about, making that really ticker along very nicely. However, just having good research when we're talking to the public or to the government as a whole, that's not enough. We do have to show how this research is translating and that's what this arrow here is translating out into social, environmental and economic benefit for the nation. And here are some examples, food security, increased health, longevity and well-being, reduced carbon emissions, they're just examples. So you will note that in one of the criteria we're looking at, can you explain to us how this research sort of translates over into those areas of social, environmental and economic impact. And again, why did we ask you that question? That's because as an infrastructure program, that's what we're being asked by the chief scientist in the Department of Education and the Australian government to explain to them how your fantastic transformative collection transforms research and then has some kind of a broad impact. All right, so that's the kind of background. I'll just now go over the details of how you get involved and then we'll be starting the questions in probably just a few minutes. So if you start to think back questions now would be the time to note them in that have a look in your GoToWebinar thing, you'll find a thing that says questions. All right, how would you get involved? Here are the key steps. You need to read the background information. We're sharing the slides here. I apologize, the slides, there's a lot of words on these slides and things, but that's because we want to share them out there and make sure that people know how to get to things. So anyway, first up, read the background. There's a link there where we've also got some frequently asked questions which we will update over the next month. So good to keep an eye on those. As we get a question, we're going to do this out in the open. So if you ask us a question we may not get directly back to you. That's because we're publicly updating the FAQ and we'll get back to you when we've updated that so that as a general rule, if anyone has got information from us then everyone will get the same information. That's the way we're trying to run this call. So that particular document and the FAQs and the website is the way to get all the background. On the website as well, there's an application form that you can get from that site there. So you have to fill out our particular application template and then the third step we need to submit it and that's another part of our website where you go to submit that. Most of that stuff is linked from this middle part here that particular document will give you links to most of these other things and I'll list it at the end. But anyway, the UP steps, if you want to get involved read the background information, ask us more questions, read the FAQs, it will be the stage we're at at the moment. Here are the dates just to remind you of those. So the applications opened about 10 days ago. I'll close on the 1st of May. I apologise that there's Easter and school holidays and now the Civic Duties are in elections fitting in that busy month of April but they'll be closing there on the 1st of May. We're not looking for a very detailed thing here and we're not looking to negotiate with lots of people around this. If it's a good idea, we will take it on face value and try and get a contract very quickly. So we're looking for about two pages from you. It's meant to be a very detailed set of documentation so we're hoping a month, even a busy month like April will be good enough for you to provide that stuff. Depending on how many, I said that will be after the 15th of May that's the target we're looking at if we get 200 applications and it may well take us a little bit of time to go through that. There is a panel just through a little aside here. The ARDC is inviting about four or five people in each of the programs to help us to make a decision there. So there will be a panel where external people will be in the majority, there will still be ARDC people there sitting through and helping to make the decision but the decisions will be informed by the sector. So again, we need to get all those people together so it may take some time into May. My rough thing is that hopefully by the end of May you really will have the charity to know that you're on the track there and you've got May, June, July and August to get on and do the work. We're closing at the beginning of September and we will want the learnings and the presentation at that summit in September. All right, if you do have a, if you want to contact us about this that's the email here on the left, submissions at ARDC and there's a number of ways for you to stay in touch there on the right. Please subscribe to the newsletter and we'll get updates about this and other programs and just a bit more information about what we're doing if you have our newsletter. You can follow the Twitter handle there and we have that website which is pretty much where you'll find the homepage for most of the materials that I talked about today. So that's the background information time and just to repeat then that this URL, I don't know if you can see my cursor, but if you can't on the right hand side stay in touch, the very bottom link, there's a webpage there and most of these other things, you know, the email address and the FAQ are linked from there. A little bit of a trick. Make sure you scroll all the way down. We've had some feedback. There's a big blue thing that comes in the middle. Don't stop there. I'm going to write the way down the link for the FAQ, the link for the download of the documents. There's a whole set of stuff right down the bottom of that page. So make sure you, the link for the FAQs is actually on the page so keep scrolling until you find it. Thank you. And we look forward to working with you all in this interesting program and beyond.


Hello everybody. Welcome to this talk on expediting the Brazilian-Portuguese documentation process. I'm very glad to be part of this LibreOffice Conference 2021. My name is Timothy Brennan, Jr. I live in Brazil. I've been living in Brazil. My family has been in Brazil for three generations. My children are the fourth. My wife and children are Brazilian and I speak both English, American English, and Brazilian Portuguese fluently. And I am very happy to be part of this process, helping out with the LibreOffice and the translation process and everything else involved. So let's talk about one of the issues that we have with documentation. So software releases in LibreOffice, especially after LibreOffice started its release cycle every six months. Very fast, but the documentation has a hard time keeping up with the release cycle. So it's a slow process because just the beginning, the first part of the cycle translation takes a long time. Then you have to go through two revisions, you know just one isn't enough, and finally there's the publication process. So we had to speed up the process for us to be able to catch up and keep up with the software. So there are some changes and some strategies that we took on and so one of the things is translate the main document once and then do a correction of the translation and subsequent documentation be reviewed rather than just simply always translating the full document from 100% English back into Portuguese again. It's very expensive in terms of time and effort. So we also when we do this we're going to keep and maintain different formats like ODT, PDF, HTML, EPUB for ebooks and stuff like that. So when we update a new version we can update also our centralized repository, I guess you could call it, where we keep our documents. So with that all we need to do is review the Portuguese version rather than translate the whole thing from the beginning. So what do we do to speed up the translation part? We actually use an online open source service, we're going to talk about that very soon. We upload the file, ODT file, have the machine translated and downloaded, that's simple. So this eliminates also the language barrier that many times could exist when some Brazilian translator is fluent in spoken English or sometimes isn't able to keep up with the nuances of some of the things in English. So machine translation really lowers the language barrier a lot and it is much better to have an imperfect text than no text at all. So this is one of the things that we've been very emphatic on. Now the big heavy work is revision. So we correct the sentences because machine translation, as everyone knows, is not perfect. It helps a lot but there are a lot of funny mistakes we'll see about those really soon. We also have to really go through a lot of consistency check to make sure that what was translated and what has been translated fits with the software. And after that part is done, which is the bulk of the work we do today. Publication. And finally we reach the level of publication. By the time we get there the hard work has been done. Publication does involve a lot of work on the final revisors. So what do we use? We use makecat.com. Obviously there are others. We're not espousing only makecat but we got open source. So that's one of the big things that we focus on having an open source machine translation. Also makecat.com does not require to install any software so we can do that online. And the process is very simple. Get the original file in English, upload it, have the machine translate it and download it. Simple as that. We can also add a standard translation member if we want to. We haven't had a need of it yet. And then that translated document can also remain online. We can go back and download that document again if we have to. So it's a nice way to keep a little backup of the translated file. So we maintain the ODT format. It keeps all the styles, all the fonts, and everything, the tags that we have in it from the ODT format. So also, technical English is easy to translate in machines. So there's a very low percentage of errors or a high percentage of correct answers or translations. So that's another advantage of machine translation. Now the big work is correcting the machine errors and translator errors. And that requires, you know, at least for you to be good in Portuguese. So everyone on the team is fluent in Portuguese. And have a good working knowledge of English and be able to compare between one language and the other. So there are a lot of contextual errors that have to be checked. Software elements have names that can confuse a translator, for example. So here are some examples of some of the things we have to correct. In Portuguese, you'd say, click on the organize tab and it translates Piquinha Organizar Abba, which is wrong in Portuguese. You have to switch the order. Adjectives and nouns are reversed in Portuguese. So Piquinha Abba Organizar, so we have to keep our eye out for that. Some humorous and funny things that happen, and we also have to sometimes stop and really stop and really think about what we're reading. Like for example, bold can mean bold as in a strong font, but bold as we know in English can mean audacious. Well, when it translates bold to audacioso in Portuguese, it's just so funny because it has nothing to do with bold font. And we have deck.  So the word Baralho, specifically deck of cards, has no margin for other meaning. So a lot of times we have to change that. In fact, we've changed deck to pineal, which is something more like panel. Works much better in Portuguese, no ambiguity there. Outline. Outline we use for, you know, when we're outlining a picture, when we're outlining a document, stuff like that. In Portuguese, the terms can be very, very different. So when we say, when the machine translates contorno, for example, that has no meaning in the context of outlining a text, contorno would be something more like a draw when you're drawing a rectangle or a square and you do a line around that, that line, that perimeter is contorno. So we've had some laughs with that. Also left as in left and right and not left as in the past tense of leave. So sometimes the machine will misinterpret it and put down de show, meaning go away. Table, which we use for where we eat on are also the table on our document. Meza has nothing to do with tabela. So we have to keep our eyes open for that. And shift, meaning the shift key, which does, in the old times of the typewriter, shift the letters from small caps to upper caps. But in Portuguese, it's totally meaningless. Mudança means change of transformation. Character in a movie, in a book, personagem in Portuguese has nothing to do with caractere, which is what we're looking for in this document. Break, as in line break, column break, things like that. More the translation sometimes means rupture, like what in the world? And then all of a sudden, oh yes, break, of course. And shift plus end, which is finguturno, meaning the end of the shift for workers, such as doctors, nurses, and people like that. So that's part of the bulk. And we have some good laughs with that because obviously a machine is not a human. So it can't keep up with all the nuances our brains are capable of as humans. So we also revise and correct for better reading in the target languages in Portuguese. Sometimes it may be grammatically correct, but it doesn't sound right. So for example, the translator might mimic the English language. And so we have to take a look at that, say, hey, this is unnecessary. This is extremely redundant. This sounds weird. So for example, we have this here already. If the element already exists, we just get already out in the context this happened in Portuguese. So because it's just really not necessary. For example, in Portuguese, the pronoun you is translated voce, where many times voce is unnecessary because the conjugation of the verb that follows already tells what person it is. So we can eliminate that. And sometimes I use a control H for voce. I go one by one, check them out and very rarely do I leave one in. So we also focus on good writing for technical texts. And so that requires that we change sometimes a little bit a few of the terminologies and expressions. Grammatical mistakes are very rare, you know, but they're there, but they're obvious. They stick out. Now the golden rule for this consistency check process is the software is always right. What does that mean? Sometimes we'll find inconsistencies between the documentation, even in its original in English and in Portuguese. So we will go to the software. The software says such and such a thing. The documentation will say another thing and we will follow what the software says. And so we will follow what the software says. And so differences with the software will be reported. The interface and help translate on web light, we can do like fixed translation errors, context errors, terminology errors, grammatical and linguistic errors. All these can be fixed and they will also sometimes even serve as bug reports for who knows, even some software mistakes or something in the menu system or contextual errors that are confusing in Portuguese. And sometimes even we'll find English errors or an error in terminology or concept. So one of the nice things about being in a documentation team has been that we are able to help out with some development, you know, not on the level of a programmer. So how does a team being managed right now? So we have a channel on telegram, instant messaging for quick communication during the week, and we call people to join during the week who are on the team on PapuLibri, which is LibreChat in English. And we use documentation, GC documentation platform for us to chat. That's our one hour a week meeting. We discuss anything LibreOffice from technical issues to minutiae of how the proper hyphen or, you know, half hyphen or dash or whatever these things we've talked a lot about. We try to keep it an hour. Sometimes we go about 10 or 15 minutes over time. But then as our friend Tulio always says, let's stop now because we'll run out of subject to talk about next week, which is a joke. Of course, we never run out of subjects, but we'd go too late. But anyways, it's really nice these meetings on a weekly basis. And some of the earnings we've had, I've learned a lot of LibreOffice on a software level just by reviewing the documentation in Portuguese. It forces me to think in two languages and forces me to use the software in a manner that I wouldn't if I weren't doing this. So I learned a lot about styles, formats, advanced techniques, databases, mail merge, security, all kinds of stuff, safety and everything. So each of us grabs a chapter. We put our names on a spreadsheet. And when we're done, we let everyone know. And we check to see if anyone else has got another chapter. If that chapter hasn't been taken, we will take it and move on to the next one. So our knowledge of professional documentation creation has increased greatly. How to organize ourselves to get tasks done, the assembly of the final document where Olivier sets up the master document and the chapters and everything. Our language expands. My particularly in Portuguese language has developed quite a bit just by listening to different ones talking in Telegram and our chats on Jitsi and everything else, IT, terminology, knowledge and everything. So we get to participate in development of LibreOffice software with the international team. This is a really nice thing, too. We start getting more involved. And of course teamwork, I mean, what can I say? Teamwork is always the best. So after all of this time, we've done this. Here we have Estanche de LibreOffice, which is something equivalent to LibreOffice bookshelf. And this is, of course, an older picture. As LibreOffice is always updating, the documentation is also. And we have our team here of people. And so basically we have, from this point forward, I'm going to show you here. I'm going to go around this area here. And so we have Jackson Cavalcanti. We have Tulio. We have Olivier, which most everybody I'm sure already knows, too. And we have Cristina. We have Diego. And down here we have, what's his name? Rafael Lima. This is our roadrunner. His name is Raúl Pacheco. He's our roadrunner because he's so fast and he does everything faster than anyone. He leaves us in the dust with his work. So he's well known in our group for that. And we have here Luciana. And then we have Marcia. We have Flavio Chefer. And we have Vera Cavalcanti. And this is myself here. Everybody, thank you so very much. This has been a great opportunity to be a part of this team, worldwide team, international team of LibreOffice. I've learned a lot and I have so much to learn yet. Thank you very much for this opportunity and I am open for questions. And hopefully I'll be able to answer them. Okay. My video is finished. Yes, I have a question for Tim. What is the next steps that the team is taking in the future? Hello. So our next step that we're going to be taking is to develop more the documentation and the newer versions. We are going to be not doing a full complete translation, but working on the documentation we have. And I guess I don't know if that answers your question, but I guess that's the answer I would have right now. Yeah. That is interesting because since we have eliminated the translation and one of the things that we have asked upstream is that the new developments in the English documentation that we get a specific section to indicate the changes in the books so that we can go directly into the new parts and new pieces of documentation and just translate what is there. It doesn't prevent us to review the full book, but nevertheless it's a little bit easier for us to update because we don't want to go through the full cycle of translation. There is no need for that anymore. So the idea is to keep close look at the developments in the English documentation. And our experience in Brazil, I think it's very advisable to reproduce into other languages. One of the things that it really matters is that machine translation is lowering the barrier, as Timothy said. And it's much easier to get people that are knowledgeable in your language than people that are knowledgeable in two languages. So you can really increase the amount of people participating in the group of documentation by eliminating the language. So this is good, yes. Yes. True. I have done some translation work and definitely the machine language translation has expanded much our capacity to save on time and focus on quality documentation. Yeah. Any more questions, anybody? So, room is nothing? Okay, my question. So this is a very interesting talk because the Japanese community also challenges the documentation translation. But we can not success now. So machine translation is so easy, but so translation quality is not good now. Yeah. So translation in Portuguese is so machine translation quality is good or not, but that's your question about the quality. Yes, yes, quality. Yes, yes. The quality is good. I think one possible thing that helps is we share English and Portuguese share a similar script system. If my knowledge of Japanese writing system is correct, I think there are two or three writing systems, right? Yeah. So I don't know how that works on a machine translation level because I know nothing about Japanese language, I mean very little except. So it has worked very well because like I said on the presentation there, there are some small differences, but structurally, you know, Indo-European languages, the script are very similar. There are some just switches around grammatical structures, but the quality is excellent. I mean, I can attest to that. I've been a part of the process. The quality is very high, and I think it's like Olivier mentioned just now. It is something very interesting to check into, and I'm sure the people in Japan who would work on a team like this, who are working on a team like this, would have their own sets of challenges, but I believe it's these developing, facing these challenges is what helps develop new technology. I know that one of the advantages of using machine translation, especially for European language like Portuguese, is that the amount of vocabulary of the technical English is very shallow. Although Timothy mentioned some mistakes, the number of mistakes is very low, and the technical English is not a very rich English. So it's very limited in terms of vocabulary, and we pick one or two mistakes, but it's not like translating Shakespeare. Probably the number of mistakes would be much higher, so this is an advantage. To me, machine translation is like a bilingual dictionary on steroids, I guess you could say, with lots of options and capacities. It just enhances our translation capacity. I remember years ago when I would translate from Portuguese to English or vice versa, I would use an actual paper book dictionary and go through and everything. So it's just an enhancer. To me, it's like a great enhancer. It really saves a lot of time for us. The big work is to actually process the document, compare with the original, compare with the software. For example, I have to have a labor office in Portuguese, a second installation of a labor office in English to check what the language is in English. So then when I'm doing the documentation review, I'm also doing screenshots and everything. It's what we all do in our team. So it's very interesting. It really pushes us to develop as humans, even though we're using machines, we are developing ourselves. Yeah. And now chatting, chat room is one question. So that's guide. Sorry, I pasted the chat. Oh, okay. Guide, exhalation require meeting, or is it possible split efforts per individuals? Translation, okay. Meetings are very important because you have to talk about details, you have to talk about specificities of your target language. So for example, in Portuguese, like I said, those were humorous examples I gave, or discussions about the hyphen, the dash, the double dash, and things like that. For example, in Portuguese, like on Room 1, Felima was mentioning how the desk point and the thousands placeholder, they're reversed in Portuguese. Those are just small examples of what happened. So it's very necessary to have these meetings. I would say you can split the individual, we do split them up per individuals, but without the meetings, I don't think the process would work that very well. That weekly meeting, that human bonding that we develop on a weekly basis, really makes a big difference for us. It's just necessary. We're not machines. We're human beings. So this part about us getting together on a weekly basis, chatting, laughing together, talking about common subjects, but always our meetings are focused around labor office, and we try to stay focused. Sometimes we'll go off on these small rabbit trails, but that's what adds to the spice of being part of the team. You know, it's not me in my own office working alone. It's human beings bonding together. I think it's possible, but it makes a big difference when you have these meetings on a weekly basis. That's my answer for that question. Thank you. I just wanted to add something. Yes, the meetings, like Timothy said, is important for the bonding, but also, of course, since we have chapters and the document can be split, of course, by several, and you can distribute the workloads between several members of your community. But, of course, there need to be a coordination, and the coordination is rather simple. We expect, for example, that when we pick a chapter for revision and we put in advance dates, deadline, we try to honor the deadline. If we cannot honor the deadline because we are all volunteers, then we send a message saying, I'm going to be a bit late, but we manage the expectations, and we try to, of course, to be as strict in terms of commitments, which is important for us. So, yes, you can split the work into several individuals, but it's good to have a weekly meeting or a bi-weekly meeting just to follow and to keep the work active. I think there's a second question there. If I'm not mistaken on telegram, mind if I read it? Okay, there we go. Thank you. Have you tried translating complex, structure-wise docs such as basic cheat sheet? As far as I know, we're focusing on the documentation right this moment. We're not focusing outside of that. It may be a subject we might bring up, I don't know, Olivier could probably even answer that better than me, but right now our focus has been the official documentation. I just want to add that these basic cheat sheets, if they are the ones that were created by Jean-François Niffnaker, then this is a very nice piece of work and it's maybe interesting, yes, that we get it translated into Portuguese. Of course, there is a small amount of text and quite a lot of lines of code, so the code is not going to be translated, but yes, this is a nice thing to add. Yes, of course. Okay, so it's time up now. Thank you. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you so very much. Great presentation.


Thirty-forty years from now, you're going to see a young Marine wearing this. You may not know if he's in the sixth Marines or he's in the fifth Marines. And you may not ask, but you know that you wore it. And you became a part of a brotherhood that has been around since that long fight at Bella Wood. When they were running this way, we were running that way, where the battle was. And this regiment has done it over and over and over again. And this regiment will always do it because of the leadership of Lance Corporals, Corporals, Sergeants, and some of the outstanding officers that have led this regiment. We have a legacy and it is your responsibility to continue that legacy of the fighting fifth. You are charged to add to that legacy of the fifth Marines as the most decorated regiment in the Marine Corps. God bless. God bless the Marine Corps. Who raw?


What's good Josh boros back again with another video, so I'm gonna check out rear Ripley Breaking the internet WWE WrestleMania twist endings and Goldberg son is Wrestling now This is gonna be a very interesting one if you haven't seen the rear Ripley clip that's been circulating all over social media right now You're probably gonna enjoy what you see especially if you're a rear Ripley fan Y'all were sending it to me. It's on my Twitter right now.  Appreciate all love and support. Let's get right into this video What is going on guys it is WrestleMania here backwards some more news join us now as we look at the wildest news stories and rumors You need to know including is a big twist coming at WrestleMania 40 an active WWE star takes on a new role a Legendary team leaving TNA is Goldberg son wrestling rear Ripley tributes Rikishi in a cheeky way and much more Be sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell for daily wrestling videos and follow us on Facebook for Also, check out our new videos on WrestleMania short analysis of the intro and get straight into our first story That first we looks at could there be a big twist at WrestleMania 40 at over today's news is an interesting comment from Rikishi Who shared his perfect outcome for the Jimmy vs. J showdown at WrestleMania 40 in two weeks? Speaking on his podcast the father of Jimmy and chase they did that the highly anticipated showdown should finish with both men Rejoicing and actually rekindling their relationship I could only pray for our father. They go out there perform and be able to walk out there and walk back I would love to see them walk back together I would love to see my boys at WrestleMania 40 walk back together holding hands so that story can close Whilst it's incredibly wholesome that Rikishi sees this as the perfect finish This isn't far off from what many fans have been pitching on social media Seeing the Usos embrace following the match would receive an earth-shattering ovation The Usos reforming on the grandest stage would also add an extra layer of intrigue and interest to the Roman Reigns vs. Cody Rhodes night two main event whilst Rikishi seems incredibly excited for the Usos vs. Usos match.   Let us know in the comments down below. Next up I'm okay with that the only way that I think storyline wise you do that you would have Jay Luz You would have Jay Luz Because Jay in my opinion, I feel like he can take a loss I feel like Jey Uso can take a loss in this particular situation If you're gonna have them come back together. I would have Jay Luz and Jimmy you know He you know, he's he's excited and all this other stuff But he sees his brother on the mat and he picks them up You know I'm saying I would have Jimmy win the match because Jimmy could use a win He's been treated as a JAG as a joke for a while Jimmy could use that when if you're gonna have them come together then Jimmy wins if you don't then you would have Jay win and then Jimmy gets kicked out the bloodline. I Mean you can have him get kicked out the bloodline regardless if he aligns himself with Jay, but it's different now There's a different context behind it. So I would I like that idea I just would have Jimmy win the match because Jimmy can take that when he needs a win like that and then have them come together and then You can you know create a storyline with what Roman's gonna say about this. So I think that'll be pretty interesting An active WWE star takes on new role a wrestlers becoming producers or agents is traditionally a role that wrestlers take on upon retirement However, this is in the case when it comes to Pete Dunne who worked as a producer for the WWE speed tapings This report comes from Fightful select who reported WWE speed is still putting matches in the can for their eventual debut And there's an interesting note on the March 22nd tapings Long-time WWE talent Pete Dunne was listed internally as a producer for both speed matches He was also listed solo and without co-producer We're not seen his name pop up on many lists lately The 30 year old is still active in the ring as a member of the New catch Republic We'll look into this and see if he's planned to produce more or if it's an experiment with the new program This new role for Dunne is a huge note of approval from Triple H The game has always been a big fan of Dunne and for Triple H to give a wrestler that is younger than most of the roster This is a huge sign that Triple H sees him taking on more responsibility moving forward Next up who should just don't man. I love to see that because people don't realize sometimes It's not about what you do on camera. Sometimes it's what you do behind the scenes That can definitely help Help your stock rise within the company as well. So I love to see that man. Shout out to Pete Dunne Should induct Paul Heyman into the Hall of Fame Paul Heyman will take his rightful place in the WWE Hall of Fame in two weeks And there have been rampant discussions amongst fans surrounding who will induct Heyman Heyman's associate Roman Reigns discussed Heyman's upcoming induction during an appearance on the Pat McAfee show And Reigns stated that the individual who inducts Heyman needs to be authentic Whoever does it they need to be authentic. They need to tell their story of Paul There's going to be a lot of facts and history that you can lay down with the wise man all the way from the beginnings With a giant phone to being the advocate to be my special counsel Whoever does it just needs to be themselves and tell the truth Numerous names have been thrown around to induct Heyman ranging from Reigns to CM Punk Ultimately Reigns is right whoever delivers the important induction speech needs to deliver it with authenticity Who do you think should induct Heyman into the Hall of Fame? Let us know in the comments down below It would have been most likely probably probably Brock Granted, I don't know how comfortable. I mean, he's got a lot more comfortable on talking on the microphone It probably would have been Brock to be honest with you, but obviously You know what's going on with that situation. So I don't know It would be interesting if it was CM Punk I like that. I think that would be interesting, but I don't know y'all y'all let me know down below Who do y'all think would be the right person to induct Paul Heyman into the Hall of Fame? Next up WWE releasing new Cody Rhodes documentary A Cody Rhodes documentary titled American Nightmare becoming Cody Rhodes received widespread praise and it turns out that WWE have been filming part two according to Sean Ross Sapp during a recent fight for Q&A WWE even filmed Rhodes backstage when he infamously gave away his WrestleMania 40 spot to the rock Next up a legendary tag team leaving TNA Please Hey The Motocity machine guns are arguably the most decorated tag team in TNA history But unfortunately it looks like they're running the company has come to an end According to PWInsider Saturday nights taping in Philadelphia marked the final TNA performance of Alex Shelley and Chris Saban PWInsider also states that TNA held an emotional backstage send-off for the celebrated duo whose contracts are up on April 1st It's unknown what the duo had planned for the future Yet it was reported that Shelley filed to trademark the Motocity machine guns name Which heavily implies that the two are looking to continue wrestling and another promotion Next up is Goldberg's son wrestling a most WWE fans know Goldberg's son Gage for his numerous appearances in the company Most notably at the 2016 Survivor Series in SummerSlam in 2021 In a recent interview the Hall of Famer discussed whether he wants Gage to enter the squared circle Speaking on the nothing left unsaid podcast Goldberg had a firm stance on the matter And he states that he hopes that Gage has no interest in becoming a wrestler I sure hope not if there is wrestling in his future have to be his agent Nobody's gonna like that the fact is yes It is nice to have that as a feather in your cap something you can fall back on It's not as if his dad was a no-name goofy wrestler who didn't make an impact My son wants to be the antithesis of me next up a WWE star push I'm gonna probably bring a lot of attention to you and you know if that's the path that he decides to do Awesome, but I do want to make a comment on Goldberg's comment. I've been seeing you guys send it to me on my Oscar Breaking his streak and how he felt a type of way some type of way about that I'm gonna keep it a buck Goldberg worked for the time period that he was in you know that that 90s era But let's be honest Goldberg is only a few moves and that's it. That's how he was booked. That's how he was presented That's it Oscar can actually go in the ring I don't I don't even see why he would even feel some type of way because this she's legit She can go in the ring. There's nothing wrong with You know his record being broken. I think he felt some I think he was taking it as if WWE was trying to you know Was trying to mess with him trying to you know Irritate him or whatever. I'm like, bro Come on, man And then I think he had said something about everyone's using the spear like it was like personal jab Everybody people been using the spears for a long time. What are we talking about? I don't know. I don't know If his son decides to wrestle I hope he doesn't have that huge ego like his dad does because that that could be detrimental to his future, man Pushing for WrestleMania main event also two respective WrestleMania main events are locked in This isn't stopping royal rumble winner bailey from vocalizing that she still firmly believes that a match versus eos sky warrants The WrestleMania main event bailey is also of the belief that the rhea ripply versus beccy lynch matches strong enough to main event night One also match versus sky warrants the prestigious night two spot speaking with alex mccarthy from mail online bailey stated This year is mine in the year. This year has been the role model's year starting the royal rumble Okay, and I've been doing this for a long time and I've been fighting for this for a long time Becky's had a main event spot. So it's time for the role model ding dong. Hello bailey to take this main event spot You guys can have the first night and I'll take the second night. You know, we can do that You never had two women main event both shows at WrestleMania. Why can't it be this year? It's certainly understandable why the tag team matches main event tonight one After all, it's unlikely that a match with the rock would be in any other position on the card Nevertheless, it's somewhat of a shame that bailey versus sky isn't being placed in a main event slot As the build up to the championship showdown has been superb and both women have been delivering some of their finest work What do you think should bailey main event either night one or night two? Let us know in the comments down below next up Yes, if the rock wasn't involved. Yes Well, I made a video about it. Sure. Yes But most likely now that the rock is going to be involved in both nights. No Her saying that both the women should main event both nights In a perfect world possibly, but we're not living in a perfect world The rock is literally going to be there for both nights This tag match is literally one of the biggest tag matches of all time I'm sorry And I love bailey and I I agree with her the story has been there But if the rock wasn't involved, she probably would main event night one And I don't think anyone would have a problem with that But because the rock is involved And this is her opinion, of course, she's gonna feel this way and she has every right to so I'm not disagreeing with her but the whole part of Both women matches main event that wouldn't gonna happen roman. I'ma come on bro roman and codie too that yeah, that was gonna That was definitely gonna happen again roman's always gonna main event night two. I'm sorry That's just what it is until he loses the championship that that wasn't gonna change. So I appreciate her having her opinion and and her viewpoint on it, but Yeah, she she not she'll be the probably the co-main event, but she definitely not gonna be the main event So that's that's just an unfortunate reality of the situation CM Punk teasing exciting WrestleMania 40 news Although CM Punk is still injured He's still expected to have a role of some kind at WrestleMania 40 in two weeks This weekend the former WWE champion took to Instagram to show photos of a range of attires from over the years And punk promise something special for the fans attending WrestleMania Additionally punk also posted a picture of him and Randy Orton from their 2011 feud and stated that he and Orton filmed something that fans will love There's been speculation that this could be a wwe playback video where wrestlers sit down and dissect a past matchup The two legends had numerous matches including a matchup WrestleMania 27 So this is likely what punk is referring to next up rear replay pays tribute to I just hope I don't know honestly I don't think they need to put him in the match with Drew and Seth as the guest referee. I don't know maybe commentary But he will he should be a part of this year's WrestleMania. I know people are thinking that but I was like, nah I don't know we'll see Would I have a problem if they did it? No, but I I think That hasn't been built up enough yet. We're only two weeks away. Yeah, you could put them in there But I think what they would Seth and Drew got right now. It's fine So but I would like him to be a part of WrestleMania. So should be very interested to see how that will play out Kishi and breaks the internet Rear replays quickly become the queen of viral wrestling clips and in our latest antics are already becoming the talk of the wrestling world And yesterday's live event in Springfield Ripley Exposed her cheeks and delivered a stink face to Nia Jax in the style of Rikishi The spotting question received a huge ovation from the audience and Ripley would go on to retain a title in the match Which also featured Shayna Baszler. If you look on x that's literally all everybody is posting and finally can you make a shoot?  It should have been me and everything else that you want to say I'm just here to Present the information y'all do with the information what you will on star ratings Now our final story today takes a look at recent comments from aw star Kenny omega who had a bold opinion on the always controversial star ratings for matches Speaking on his twitch channel the decorated wrestler reveal that five star ratings shouldn't just be handed out like candy Did it start a movement? Did it continue a movement? Was it something that became something that sort of etched in the annals of history for like all time? I believe that's what an actual five star match should accomplish You shouldn't just hand them out like candy. It shouldn't be because the moves look good It should be because the moves look like they hurt It's a perfect blend of everything that you try to do and accomplish as a pro wrestler And that's without exposing the trade secrets Also during that twitch stream omega had endless amount of praise for cat angle and went as far as calling the wwe hall of famer His favorite wrestler of all time. Why don't you guys think of omega's comments? I want to see what jib cornet has to say about that Holy I definitely got to see what jib cornet had to say about that. Wow That's crazy, but I agree with him man. I don't care about The five star ratings and stuff like that. I agree to his point It gotta be something that will stand to test the time of match that you can just be like You can always go back and watch and it was just iconic and legendary And and the emotion is there the passion is there the intensity is there the story line is there The atmosphere is there everything aligns up for a an experience that you'll never forget And I think that should be the qualification of a five star match brain Everyone's entitled to their own opinion. So there's no wrong or right answer You know ultimately, but I definitely do agree with Kenny omega there and the fact that he you know Show curd angle the the proper love as anyone should is pretty awesome So I definitely got to see what jib cornet has to say because I know That that's going to be very interesting because he doesn't like any omega But it's gonna be very interesting to see what he has to say about that But comment down below. Let me know How many of y'all enjoyed that real Ripley clip? Just be honest. Just let me know I know I know all of you did mostly you did maybe not all of you Maybe some of y'all have self-control, but most of you most of you watch that clip multiple times, huh? It's okay It's okay, man I'm not good. I'm not here to judge you Do you think but I appreciate how I love sport road to 150k and i'm seeing you to the rest of the world Appreciate y'all can't even me. See y'all next one. Peace


I had said to them, the gold price was down, I think the gold price it got to about $380 and our cost of production cash cost was $360. So, fully loaded cost was about the gold price. I said to the union, it's not going to work. And we tore up the collective agreement that had been established over since the union was there in the early 50s, which they didn't think was very good. And they said, look, we're in business to make money. If we don't make money, this mine is going to be shut down. I see a way of keeping it going by changing our operating relationship in first and foremost. You have to understand that we're in business to make money. If we make money, we can share it. If we don't make money, we can't share it. And the community loses as well. Second, safety is not the exclusive preserve of management. It is a mutual responsibility of labor and management. And they found those two thoughts rather, they were opposed to them. And I said, in terms of technology and training, I'd like to broaden the skill set of everyone so they have better opportunities if they happen to go to another mine or even within their own mine. And they didn't like that training. And then when we rewrote their collective agreement, they said, we're going out on strike. And the strike lasted 46 months. It was one of the longest industrial strikes in North America, the longest in the mining industry.