Good morning. Well, good morning for me. Hello, everyone, and happy time zone, wherever you are, whatever time of day it is. I'm Betsy Koh, and we're here for another new member Q&A via Zoom. And new, the term new is in quotes, it's new-ish, so it doesn't matter if you've been on WikiTree for six days or six years. If you have some questions, this is the place to come where we can talk about it in real time and screen share and hopefully get you going where you want to go on WikiTree. It's definitely a tricky learning curve. Once you get up and running, people sort of, they find that they, they accelerate and, but you do have to, you know, stick with it through a little bit of a growth phase. So I'm really happy to have everyone here. With me co-hosting, we have Hilard Gadsby, who's over in Wales, and Murray Maloney, who's, there you are, from Canada. Just to give you a little background on me, I've been on WikiTree for almost five years now, coming up on it, and I, I myself went through the learning curve period. I am outside of WikiTree, I am a teacher, I'm a music teacher, and so I thought a really nice way to give back to the community would be to apply my teaching skills, and I learned how to teach over online platforms during the pandemic, as all of us teachers did. So that's how the, the Zoom Q&A sessions were born. Where I spend time on WikiTree is I'm a member of several projects. I'm in the England, Wales, Scotland, Canada projects, and I just started coordinating the New Taiwan Project. I'm a mentor, and I help on the events committee. So the, the Wiki Games, the Rock, random, the, which is random acts of WikiTree kindness, the Thons, I'm actively involved in helping make all of those happen.  Yeah, I'm one of the project coordinators for the England and Wales groups. I'm also one of the greeters. So when you join that, you may have been greeted by me, you may have been greeted by one of the other greeters. There's a few of us that we cover, trying to cover the whole 24 hours as much as possible. I'm, as project coordinator, I'm involved with the orphan trail. I'm one of the orphan trail project coordinators. So if you've heard of that. Wonderful. Thank you. And Murray, would you introduce yourself? Hello, everyone. I'm Murray Maloney. I'm a retired technical writer. I do some of the technical documentation for the WikiTree browser extension and a couple of the tree apps from Greg Clark. And I pitch in here with Betsy when I can. And I'm happy to see you all. Fantastic. So I know that Pam had said something in advance on the G2G thread about wanting to see a demonstration of how to create a personal category. And we can definitely do that. I also had it in mind to demonstrate how to add a profile connecting on to an existing profile and show how to upload a photo if anyone's interested in that. So if you have other questions, definitely, you know, we have, we have an hour today. So please go ahead and put that in the chat.  Hillary Ann has a question about being greeted. Did you see that? Oh, yeah. I'm just in the process of answering her. I was. Oh, okay. Yeah. But I can answer anyway, because she was asking about, because I said I, people get greeted when they join. And a lot of people probably forget who even greeted them. It's just so that everybody knows that there's somebody there that they can ask when they first join. If you need help later on, you'd probably best contact in the mentors project, because if you're struggling, the mentors can help you a bit with your whatever you're struggling with. If, and if you, if you clear as to what sort of thing you're, you're, you're struggling with, then they'll obviously hopefully get you the right mentor. Or if one mentor doesn't, doesn't, can't quite help you. They usually pass you on to somebody else that may be in a better position to help you. Because I'm also, I am a mentor, but at the moment I'm poor. So I've got one person I'm mentoring, but she's not particularly active. So I'm not doing a great deal with the mentors at the moment, but I, I have been mentoring people in the past as well. So quite often you find that the great, quite a few degree to end up being mentors as well, because we tend to know a bit about what's going on in wiki trace. Terrific.  So, you know, if you feel like you want to be paired up with an more experienced wiki tree, you know, just, just go to that project page and, and you can be, you can be paired up with somebody. So let, let us know if you have more questions about that. Pam, I, what I'd like to do is I'd like to do the personal categories, not not first, since that's a little bit more of an intermediate skill. So is that okay with you? Yep. And so, is that, does every, is everybody interested in seeing a profile creation? Yes, just walking through that, especially with, with connect-a-thon coming up. And I know a few of you are signed up to do connect-a-thon. Who signed up? Who doesn't know what I'm talking about? So connect-a-thon is one of our and big yearly events. There are usually three connect-a-thons throughout the year, where the whole community, well, you sign up, you register for the event. We usually have about 800 wiki treeers sign up for the event. And the goal is to connect as many profiles as you can to already existing profiles. And we have teams. Many of them are geographically based. We have the Canadian Connectors. We have Team Italy, Mid-Atlantic US. We also have teams that are a little not geographically based. And one of those, which you should know about is the new team. And so, yeah, Pam, Pam is going to be on the new team with me. Brand new, brand new team where it's for people who have not done a thon before. And so, I know with the thons, a lot of times people get really into it, you know, like with, you know, massive numbers of profiles and points, but the new team is not about that. The new team is about learning and about having a good time and camaraderie. There's, there are 25 of us signed up right now. And the plan is to give extra support. So, we're going to have a Zoom meeting on April 4th, which is a little more than a week before the event, to, you know, to get organized, show some skills. I'm so lucky to have two coaches also with me on the team, Kathy Zipper and Dave Draper. So, we're going to have little subgroups within our team and just make sure that everybody is supported and able to work on wiki tree, you know, from where they are and go onward and upward. So, please consider that. I'll put that link in at the end. Okay. So, let me go to, let me just, so what I'm going to do today for creating a profile is I'm going to add, add on to Mabel Wilson. And she was married three times. So, I have two of her husbands. And now I'm going to add in her third husband, George F. Silkworth. So, when you go to add a profile in wiki tree, you do have to do a little homework in advance. Now, lucky for me, I had, I found him on family search. And if you don't already have a family search account, I really recommend that you get one because it, well, it's free just like wiki tree. And it gives you access to a very large collection of sources. And it creates the citations for you. And it's just really kind of a win-win. Once you have it, you'll find yourself using it constantly. So, I'm now going to go to the sources tab for George. And now he has 11 sources. Now, I will say some of you may already know that it's possible to use the Sorcerer's extension and grab all 11 of these sources, assuming that you've, you know, gone through them and they're all good. You can do that all in one swoop. I'm not going to do that today, just to show you sort of the more manual process. So, since I'm adding him on as a spouse, I'm going to go see we have his marriage record in 1922 to Mabel. And it's going to go to the webpage. It's really helpful because it gives me his father's name, his mother's maiden name. Mabel, her second married name was Hale. There seemed to be some issues here with the little typos, but I know it's her because that is her mother's maiden name. And that's her father's correct name. And there is the marriage date. So, the really nice thing about family searches, I can go right over here on the left and I can copy that citation. It's already done for me. Now, I'm going to go back to Mabel and it's going to ask me, add a spouse? And I'm going to do that. Now, I did, did check their George, George Silkworth is not already on wiki tree. So, I'm going to say I am want to create a new profile for this person. And now I'm going to add in George Silkworth and his birth date. Now, I took this from his person page on family search, but it is corroborated on another record that I'm going to add as well. So, I feel confident in that. Born in Brooklyn, Kings County, New York. I don't have an exact date. So, I'm just going to put the month and the year. Also, Brooklyn. Why doesn't it give me the same as it did before? Kings, interesting. All right. Go ahead with that. All right. So, you may, if you wish, add some biographical detail right at this moment. I myself, I prefer to wait. I'm going to go ahead and I'm going to paste in that marriage record, which very nicely gives me the date. And now I'm going to say this is optional, but just good practice, marriage record. And again, it asked me for the details 1922, certain Brooklyn, New York. And she died March 30, 1960. So, that would be the marriage end date. Whoops. No, I'm certain. Okay. So, now I'm going to continue. Now, the system, if it is possible, especially with a common name, it may, it may give you some possibilities like you didn't think there was a profile for this person, but have a look at these. And so, you can scan through the list and look for dates or locations and do check out anything that seems close or possible. So, I'm going to go ahead and create my profile. And now it takes me to the profile. This is, he has become Silkworth 42. And I'm in edit mode here. So, now I can add a couple of things. I know that his, his middle name is something to do with F. So, I'll go ahead and add that in. And I can say he was born in 1882. Well, actually, I can say he was born on November 12, 1882. Okay. Going back to this to his parents, Charles, Charles Silkworth, and Alice Parks. Now, this is a really nice lead in to, to Pam's question about personal categories. So, if I, if I had profiles for Charles and Alice, I would hyperlink them here so that a reader of the profile could quickly go jump to their profiles. But I don't have time to do that right now. So, I'm going to categorize them. So, personal categories are things that are, they're like your personal to do list on wiki tree. So, you can see I've got several. I type in my ID and then I can see, ah, co 31 needs profiles created. So, now that's going to add this profile to my list of profiles created. And then as soon as I see the bio, I'm going to say, aha, I can add Charles and Alice to the tree. So, I may do that during connectathon if I have a chance. And now I'm just going to go ahead and add on to the bio. He married. Now, I'll show you how to hyperlink. Mabel. Sorry, I'm late by the way. Hi, Steve, welcome. Steve, Steve Greenwood is here. He's our, our fourth host who is usually here. And we're just creating a profile, Steve. Right. And I see you might be getting into personal categories as well. Yeah, I'm just sort of warming, warming the topic up. Okay. I was going to try to help with that myself. Absolutely. We'll let you do the demo of that. Okay, cool. So, now I was saying that if these two folks had profiles, I could hyperlink them. But they do not. I'm just going to make sure that I am using the correct, yes, Mabel is Wilson too. So, now if I want to hyperlink within the bio for Mabel, I'm going to say two square brackets per a wiki tree ID, the vertical line, which in many keyboards is sort of over to the far right. And then, however, I want her name to appear. Wilson close brackets on January 16, 1922. And then I think that's good for me. I'm going to say I added a source. Oh, wait a minute. Let me just, to be thorough here, I did say that I had another record that corroborated his birthday, which is his Social Security Death Index. So, you see, there's the confirmation of his birthday. So, I'm going to go to that again, copy the citation, go back. Now, right now I'm doing bullet point citations, which is where if you're brand new to wiki tree, that's where I recommend that you start. I'm going to add an asterisk that creates the bullet point and going to copy that in. Now, if you're a little more advanced, I know we have a range of levels here. If you're more advanced and you want to do inline citations, you could do this. Let me go back. I'm going to grab his marriage citation, and I'm going to go to the statement about his marriage to Mabel. Now click C for site. And now you see I've got these two little ref tags, and I'm going to insert the marriage reference in there. Now you can preview and see what that's going to look like. First of all, you can see I have the hyperlink to Mabel, and now the fact of his marriage is linked directly to that source. Let's see, one more problem. What if you just use the wiki tree sourcer and just use the inline source instead of going all the different? Yes, yes. So that's a good point. And so the wiki tree sourcer will create a citation complete, but then you don't have to use the C button. So you're on a source and it's going to create this for you. So complete with the ref tags. There is also a quicker way of adding the link as well. Oh, what is that? If you scroll up a bit, you go to the spouse and you hover over it, it will click up, and then you can just copy the link. Yes, copy wiki link. And then you can just place that in rather than having to type it all out. Right, absolutely. And it'll do the double brackets on the pipe.  And let me just put that here. Oops, there. Oh, it adds the birth and death date as well. That's whatever it's on there. But now you don't need that bullet point source, you can remove it. Exactly. So I'm going to go ahead and by the way, when you do a source citation in sourcer, just be aware that it's going to add the asterisks in for you. It's very helpful. Sourcer is wonderful. So I'm going to leave that. Now what have I done? I've added sources. I've improved the bio a tiny bit. I have categorized and we're going to look at what that looks like. And full say. So now you can see that George is in my profiles created category. And if I click on that, here's my to-do list for Connect-a-thon. These are all places where I can go and add profiles. So, yep. All right. So that's a really nice segue. Steve, you want to show now how to, you want to take over and let me make you a co-host? Yes. Yes. So I'm just, okay. So I have co-host abilities now. Yep. Okay. Now, the last time I tried to share my screen with a genealogical society on Friday, my computer decided to overheat and shut down. So I'm going to hopefully not do this for too long because it may be having some issues. But if you lose me, that's why. But we'll go ahead and share the screen right now. And I'm just going to start at my profile right now. So I can see this. Yes. Yes. Okay. Great. I probably have one of the longest profiles in all of WikiTree. So all of this stuff, we're going to go, we're going to go to the very bottom, past all of my things. Keep going. It's three years of stuff in comments. So if I go to the very bottom, I have linked my personal category to my profile. So I'm going to click on that. And this is where I do a lot of my work from. This is the parent category of the multiple sub categories. And this also holds all the pages that I work on as well. We're going to focus on the personal categories that do things. So I have broken these up into a couple of larger subcategories, which they have within them nested smaller subcategories. So you can continue the category tree. I have a place for all my brick wall ancestors. So these are all the people that are directly ancestors to me, but we can't go any farther. We can just look at that really quick. And there's like 60 or so people in here. And they're mostly Germans. They're mostly really old Germans that we're trying to like push out those lines. A lot of them are also ladies who don't have birth names known. They just have their married names. So that kind of overlaps with a little bit of those categories. We need to add certain names. Another cool thing is if you have the browser extension, I believe there are a couple of things at the top that pop up where you can show like only unconnected profiles. So things that aren't connected to the tree. In this case, because they're brick walls, they're pretty much connected. So we don't have any of those showing up. Orphans are ones that don't have profile managers. I pretty much got all of those under my control. And then if they had any missing parents, well pretty much everybody shows up. I think there's like one living person that disappears when we look at missing parent. But basically, you know, if this was different, if there were a variety of people that had parents added, then they wouldn't show up in the list. And I know that we're pushing forward. And I know that I need to take them out of this category, for example. And then if I go to, here's one that says needs cemetery category built. So sometimes there are cemeteries that get placed on pages. And, you know, I just don't have time to create the category for the cemetery. Well, it kind of gets stuck in here. And then you can see it's kind of piling up a little bit. So I know that I have a lot of things to investigate. If I add a cemetery that's got a lot of these people in it, then that's going to, you know, take a lot of these profiles out of that category. Needing connection is one that I've created for somebody that needs to be connected to the world tree. So this is just kind of a free floating category. Actually, this is our notable Ray Stevenson. And he's still unconnected. Ray Stevenson was known for various things. He was in Thor. He was in Star Wars. He was in Rome. So he passed away last year while he was filming a film. But for some reason, he still isn't connected to the tree, even though he has 50 connections, you can see up here. So that's that's something that I want to come back to as well. And that actually opened up a new tab. Let me see if I can just get this bar out of the way really quick to move everything that's going on. I can't see the top bar. Oh, you have to maybe move it down. Yeah, I have to just destroy tabs. So then profiles created is a big one. So you can see that this has a couple of subcategories based off these numbers right here. Three and nine. Nine means there's things that are within it. And then three means there's that many subcategories. Clicking on that, I have broken this down into children and spare and parents and spouse. And you can see these numbers are pretty large as well. I got a lot of work to catch up on. And I think these profiles that were within this profile needed basically everything. So instead of just putting them in individual categories, I put them in the general needs profiles created category because these are bare bones and they really need a lot of work. But like I said, you know, if you go to the ones that need children, you know, these are a lot of my German ancestors again, and they just had a lot of kids. So I there's there's a lot to be done here. And I don't have to be the only one working on these. I mean, somebody else wants to come in and help fill those in as well. That's just the point of collaboration here at the wiki needs records is for any things that need, you know, here we go. It's pretty self explanatory needs birth records, deaf records, marriage records. This guy probably needed them all. So that's why he's in the basic category before the subcategory. Or he's, he's in the subcategory, but he's not in the sub subcategory. And then I just created this one today. I felt like this was important for some of the unknowns I was working on. So Henrietta has a married name, she doesn't have a birth name. And this kind of goes again, hand in hand with the brick walls, because we don't know her parents are because we don't know what her birth name is, right? So I just created another subcategory called needs surname. And I'm going to start adding to that as well. But I'm not going to try to add all, you know, 300,000 category or profiles that don't have surnames because we already keep track of those in different place. And then I just had fun with this one. This was called possible relatives. This kind of goes directly into my research with my second great grandfather, where I'm not sure which of these Armstrong kids is my third great grandfather because of an adoption. So it's just something for me to keep track of these people. There were some other people that showed up maybe as cousins for my DNA. So I'm just kind of keeping track of them. Looks like I might have some connections to Australia. So that's kind of cool. And then at the bottom are pretty much all of my free space pages because I'm a madman. And that includes all my sock County stuff from Wisconsin, all my German stuff from Neeter Sachsen, which is called lower Saxony in English, any other kind of German projects. My attempt at doing the 15 by 15 tracker is hiding in here, which I wasn't successful at. So just that's a place to hold all those sub pages. And there's my profile. And yeah, that's pretty much my personal category. Does anybody have any questions about that at all? I was walking the dog. Yes, I do. Can you hear me? Confusion. She wanted to go with grandma. Can you just give it overall explanation of categories?  She was going to get left. Oh, and the dog was having a fit because when he thinks care is closed. Hold on. Oh, okay. That was your end. Always. It's me. I have somebody else here talking. Oh, I see. Okay. So categories in general, again, we can use those to group people together of similar locations or similar, you know, maybe occupations or whatever they did, right? And we can use tools within those categories to find out more things. I can demonstrate that in a moment. But personal categories are another step where it's like, I don't want to have to deal with the general categorization because there might be a lot of stuff to sift through. This is stuff that I've come across myself. And these are personal projects that I know I need to get back to myself because they're either my direct heritage or it's something I'm working on in that vicinity, you know, like, you know, the Wisconsin profiles, for example. So if you go to personal categories, which this is linking to, you can see everybody's personal categories that are within maintenance categories. So maintenance categories then branches off from everything else. Steve, Steve, if you go back, could you walk through the macro from macro there? So go to, go to find categories and just show everybody. Yeah, yeah. So we'll go to find and then this goes to category categories, which should be the master category for all categories. There shouldn't be anything before this except categories, which it loops in on itself. So then yeah, within there, there's maintenance categories right there. And if you click on maintenance categories, then if you scroll down, personal categories is here with 880 subcategories. So that means there's 880 people that are using personal categories. And then this is the page I was just on. This is the 880 people. Well, we're looking at the first 200 of them. But these are all people on WikiTree that have created personal categories. Maybe I'll go delve into one of these really quick here. Who's got some cool stuff? Brandt. You can find me if you want. Shall I look for yours? Yeah, I'm B-U-C, B-U-C. Oh, it's your birth name. Yeah, B-U-C. Okay. So B-U-C. Is it Buc or Buc? Bucal. Bucal. Oh, Bucal. Yep. Here we are. Okay. My name. So you have an orphan-to-do list. Yeah. Which has 378 people in it. Yeah, that was people that I, it was profiles that I created because I imported a GEDCOM because I'm an early person and I could import a big GEDCOM in 2011. So these are people that I imported, but I've orphaned a lot of them because they're not direct ancestors. Right. You can only, you can only hold 5,000 people in your watch list. Yeah, 5,000 and I've always seemed to be keeping just over 5,000. Yeah. So the personal category is a way to actually get around that limit for the watch list. So you can still keep track of them. That's actually pretty helpful to have. And there's no limit on making personal categories. I don't believe there's any restrictions as long as it's benefiting the whole of the Wiki, right? So I'd say utilize them when you can. But yeah, no, that's, that's very cool that you got that. Again, some other people are more in-depth than others. This Crawford person has like what, 12 subcategories. So they got a whole bunch of Canada sub-project stuff they're working on, one-name study, project planning, Pre-1500, Scotland, and then they have all their sub-pages that they're working on. So I think these are immensely helpful for anybody doing research on the Wiki.  So I'm a little slow about this. Can you walk through how do you create your original personal profiles? And then do you just name, randomly name your sub-categories? Yes. Yeah, I'm going to, Steve, if it's okay, I have a, I was going to demo creating a personal category. Is that okay? Are you? Yeah, I mean, here at the bottom, I just want to indicate that this is where I clicked on it from. So on your profile, you would just, you know, create a new category by doing the double bracket, putting the word category in a colon, and then whatever your name is. So whatever your profile ideas would be the name of your personal category. And when you close it off and you save the profile and ask you, well, this is a new category. It doesn't exist. It'd be like, save anyway, create that. Then you would want to go in when you create that personal category. So I'll edit it here and we just move the screen. So when you create it, then it's a matter of putting it in the right place. And I said, basically, this is the parent personal category for me links back to me. And then I made sure that it had the category personal categories attached to it. So that will put it in the category for all the people who have personal categories. And when you save that, you know, then it becomes a thing that would get inflated later. And then you would create subcategories later. If you went to a profile for like, for example, my brick wall ancestor, and I'm just going to select August here, right? And he didn't have this category before. And this is my fourth great grandfather. But again, I went to, you know, the categories within the edit, let me actually edit him really quick, or just foe edit. And if I go to here, you can see he's got a lot of different categories, but I created maybe he didn't have this. But let's just say that I created this category. And I typed in my name, and then whatever I wanted to put in there for it in this case, brick wall ancestors, and then I saved it. It told me it didn't exist, but I saved anyway. And then it gave me the category at the bottom of the page. And then that allowed me to go to create that category. And then I added this word, or this wording at the top, which again, is pretty generic. And I made sure it had my subcategory of Greenwood 3667. So it creates that tree branch. It creates that category branch. And you just keep doing that. And you just do that over and over again, until you have all these different subcategories nested within your subcategory. Does that make sense at all? I know all the words you said, but it all is completely opaque. Okay, should we should we walk through an example? Yeah, you want to take over on this Betsy? Yeah, yep. Actually, if you could, Yvonne, Yvonne has just added asked about a guide to wiki markup code. Could I know you found this before my cheat sheet and drop that in the chat? Steve. Oh, oh yes, I can look for that right now. Okay, thank you. And because I already have poised in my there, this is a YouTube link. So Pam, I think this is what you saw before. When I gave this tip on how to create personal categories, it was on the Saturday roundup livecast. So if you go to that YouTube link, it will take you straight to the tip section. You don't have to watch 40 minutes to get to it. And you can rewatch that if there's any confusion after what we do today. So let me go to share screen. I basically have all the personal categories that I need. But I thought of one more that I could do today. So can everybody see how personal categories? Yes? Okay. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to go back to Mabel. And I'm going to create a, let's see, Wilson to I'm going to create a category for profiles where I need to do a newspapers lookup. Because I'm not on newspapers.com, you know, all the time. So I need and you know, I sort of would it would be really helpful to have a running list so that when I do have this subscription, I could, you know, barrel through everything I need to get done. So here's what you need to do. Okay. I go into edit mode. And now I'm going to categorize. Now here's an important, important point that you're going to see is that categories, the code for categories go above the biography heading, which is this, this is the biography heading, anything like stickers, those go below the biography heading. So for what that's worth. So all your personal categories are going to start with your wiki tree ID. Do a couple of brackets, don't I? Let me just, you know what I'm going to do so that I don't make any sort of mistake. Okay. So what I'm going to, I just put that in as a model. Now I'm going to, I guess I don't need the brackets there. Okay. Code 31. It is nice that it can search your existing categories at least in case you forgot that maybe you created it or you're looking for the exact title for it. It's newspaper. Now notice it doesn't recognize it anymore. So it's, it's, I'm, I'm, I'm on my own and I'm going to go. Is that going to create it from there? Or do you need to? No, you know what? I think I need to do it manually. Yeah. You can only select it if it exists. Otherwise you have to type it into the. Okay. So category. Code 31. And then you don't need the underscores. Needs. Newspaper. Look up. Close. Brackets. Okay. And now I'm going to say that I have categorized and I'm going to do a full save. Now here's where you have to be brave because you're going to get these the first time that you create a category. You're going to get this sort of angry looking red box category problems. Okay. Go ahead. Save anyway. So this is what I was talking about earlier is that you're going to get that little query that pops up. It'll tell you it doesn't exist. You can override it. Right. Exactly. Now here I'm, I'm out of edit mode. I'm still on Mabel's profile. And now when I go down to the bottom to see her category, I think yours is set up differently. It's at the top. Oh, it's at the top. Wait. Oh, there we go. Okay. Now you'll notice I added her to one of my she does need a bios. I'm fine with that. And but notice that this one that I just did is in red. Okay. So go ahead. This is a brand new profile. This will not happen. You know, subsequent times that I add to this, I'm going to click on it. It's going to take me here. Okay. Now here is where I'm going to put co 31 make sure you have category before that. Thanks to you category colon co 31. Okay. And that is going to tell the wiki tree system where, where to nest the newspaper lookup subcategory. It's going to be listed nested under my main personal category. I think you'll still work with the space, but I usually take a space out just for my purpose. Oh, you mean after the colon? Yeah, I know that I think the program will still recognize it with a space, but I think to be consistent, it would be right probably just best to do it without. Okay. All right. So save the page. Tada. Okay. So here, here is my newspaper lookup category with my one person so far Mabel. Okay. And if I were to go and let, let's, let's go back to Mabel for a second. I know that let's see, let's go to her one of her husbands and let's also add him to the category and you'll see that it's, it's going to come right up co 31 needs. You just created it. It won't show up automatically in there for a couple of minutes at least. Oh, a couple of minutes. Okay. Well, you'll have to override it by hand if you do it immediately. Okay. Oh, 31. Betsy, no, no, not in that field. Oh, right. Right. You have to type it. It's okay. We're all human here. Even as people who have been here for 15 years. But like I said, eventually when it does pop up, it's going to be so much simpler. You'll be able to grab it and go and see. Maybe the system will take about an hour. Newspapers sing it or wasn't it? Yeah, I think so. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Here you go. Yeah. No, it will tell you if you didn't spell it right. I'll say that the category doesn't exist. Exactly. Okay. And there see it. It's no more angry red. And now I have the two of them in the category. Well, everything is still defaulting pink. Is that because of our February scene or something? It's because that's the way I set up my wiki tree browser extension. So that if something is pink, it means I know that I visited that page. Okay. Yeah. But there it is. Yeah. Pam, does that help? Oh, sorry. Yes. Thank you. Okay. Okay. Denise. Yeah, just one other tip. When you create a new category, you'll see there you've got a couple items listed behind that category name, the ID, the link, the URL, and then the term use or use. If you click on that use, it will recreate that category for you. So if you've got other profiles that you want to add to that category right away, right after you've created it, you click on use. Exactly. And then you'll be able to paste that category into your new profile. So I wouldn't have had to have been embarrassed like I just was. Well, say all that again. Sure. So similar to how Hillary pointed out that I did not need to type out remember when I was hyperlinking Mabel's name, and she pointed out copy ID or actually copy the wiki link. So this mean, so if I copy that, it's going to copy what I just typed into my into the field when I was trying to add it to the second profile. I've never seen that before. That's a new feature. Yes, it is. It's been there a while. I've been using it for about a year now. We all learn new things, right? That's exactly every day. Yep. I mean, there's really, truly too much on wiki tree for most of us to know everything. And that's why the community collaboration is so amazing. So you just copy that there and then you go paste it on the profile that you're doing. Here, let me go ahead and copy. And now let me go to see who on my watch list. Well, let me go to Mildred. Yep, Mildred. And now remember it goes above the biography. See, I have given her a New York sticker, which goes below the biography. And it automatically produces the space between category and the name of the category. So if it's doing that automatically, it shouldn't be an issue. It's still going to be there. Yeah. Now we see that and we see the sticker and everything is in good order. We'll go back to category now. We can see all three of them. Yeah. Yep. That's right. Just rinse and repeat. And then go to code 31 and they can see that it subcategorizes. Right. And now it's been added to your existing subcategories. So Steve, were you able to get the useful tips for wiki code? And yeah, that's in the chat. Okay, wonderful. And I just want to emphasize to everybody that this is my personal cheat sheet. And what I mean by that is it was what I needed and what worked for my brain. So I'm thrilled if it helps you.  You're going to find things that are like, oh, I got to remember that or this will be really handy. And just make a free space page and start gathering your own list. And you can also peruse other people's too. I don't think that's an issue. Yeah, I mean, because they might have other things that they're working on that you're interested in, you know, or that these are good places to get ideas just kind of peruse the the personal categories that are out there. Oh, this is going to help a connected bond. Thank you. Good. Good. I'm glad. Bruce, you were you were lost before.  Yeah, yeah. And then I've got the tabs already open for the ready for the the things you guys posted in the chat. So I will look those up as well. Okay. All right. Wonderful. And part of the thing, you know, it's your screen just has different colors and different, you know, look than mine does. And so sometimes that that also is confusing. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Because of the way you've set up your wiki tree. Yes. Although did you say that you do have the wiki tree browser extension? Yes, you do. I haven't done any, you know, major setup with colors or anything like that. So yeah, yeah. And that's that is, I've it helps my brain to see the family on the right hand side, rather than in a list, you know, underneath the main person's name. Yeah, exactly on that. Yeah. That's how you moved your categories up to the top instead of at the very bottom. That was a wiki tree browser. Option. Yes, man. Yeah. Yeah, my own default at the bottom. I just prefer them all to be at the bottom. So I have my own preference. That's what the browser extension allows us to do. Bruce, that's in the readability options. Okay. I also wanted to point out while we're talking about categories, the beautiful thing called my connections, I wanted to showcase that for anybody that hasn't seen that yet. Oh, yeah, sure. It'd be okay if I screen share again. Go ahead. Okay. So I'm going back to my brick wall ancestors category here because these people should definitely be related to me, right? The brick wall ancestors. You can see back at the top of the page, there is a button called my connections over here on the upper right. So I'm going to click on that and let's just see. They should all be ancestors. They're going to highlight as such, but it'll actually tell me how far back these ancestors are. Now, in another situation, if you click on another random category, you may not find ancestors. You might just find cousins. And so that would be another section below that where it would say, you know, cousins, but this, you know, well, sorry, this is ancestors and cousins. But the way it identifies ancestors from cousins is that it does have the word ancestor behind every one of those people's names. So I have some very close ones that I've been working on that don't have much information. But then I go all the way back here. I got some really old ones back to like 1591. So Hans Harms, you know, is showing up as my harvest one 15 generations back. For more, I want to see that relationship to that person. I can click on the relationship finder and it shows the actual, it says, you know, he's my 13th great-grandfather or I'm his 13th great-grandson. So you can see all those people that it travels through that way. You can also go to, I thought, where's the other button? Maybe it doesn't work like this. You have to go to connection finder. That's it. I was going to say connection finder could show the pathway in which something takes. So let's use a different category here really quick. I'm going to go to possible relatives. And I'm just going to click on my connections here and see if there's any other pathways that it takes to get these people. Even though they might be related to me, I might still connect to them a different way. And so far it doesn't show any actually connected to me as ancestors or cousins, because it hasn't seen those connections. But it does show that the connections away from them are within 21 to 26 degrees. So this is somebody that I think might be my fourth great-grandfather. But it doesn't see the connection yet. However, it does go through some of my heritage and then it follows through other people. So for, you know, ballards, honey cuts, stouts, melids, vines, and then to Armstrong. So it kind of wraps itself around for a different part of America. And then if you click on alternative eugenerational path, this will show the pathway in which it takes to get to those locations. So it goes drops down a little bit. And then it kind of shoots over here until it zooms back to the other side of the page, which I have to move so I can get my bar there. Yeah. So then it keeps dropping back down into the Armstrong Sierra 1700s and then finally turns the corner and comes back in as Armstrong Line in Wisconsin. So utilizing the categories in addition to utilizing the connection finder and the relationship finder, those are some things that we can do with categories is get those people together and then identify who those people might be. Especially interesting to do on a cemetery category. Oh yeah, especially if you're related to everybody. A relative buried in a cemetery. Well, run the connection finder and you might be surprised at who else is buried there. Yeah. So connections or categories are very helpful in multiple reasons like we just show today. Well, for a few of us, we do have to keep this close as close to an hour as possible. But do we have any and we have time for just a few minutes for questions? Any any burning questions? Yeah, I do. I'm sorry.  Is there a place that you can post suggestions? For for things that you'd like to see covered in these sessions? Oh, no, for on wiki tree things that for example, I would really like it to be able to parse a date entered with periods. Yes, I can tempi like mad and and the period is so much easier to hit than the hyphen. Yeah, yeah, what I would recommend is to post something on YouTube. And then other people can chime in. And you know, I think I think if you tag it as probably suggestions, there might even be a category for suggestions. I almost always post to the treehouse, which is general general sorts of announcements. But I think there might be a more technical board on G to G. And the sort of suggestion gets to the right ears. And I was just doing a search work now. Help suggestions. There is actually a health page on it. Okay, fantastic. But I don't know that's the same types of suggestions. This could be related to wiki tree plus errors, warnings and hints. That's that's what it talks about as suggestions. Is that different? Our suggestions is when you're getting a problem with a profile and it points out what problems you might they might be on a profile. Right, that's what we're looking at is suggestions. If there's a warning, if there's a misspelling, if it's not lining up with some wiki data or find a grave data. Those are those are what we call suggestions on wiki tree. So maybe you have to go to the G to G if you're looking for something more specific. Bruce, could you explain your problem again? So you're you're entering a problem? Yeah, if you if you in the birth date, like type in 10.8.1954, it will not accept it. It will not be able to read it. You have to use hyphens. That's because it turns it in the minute when it after it parses it, it turns it into eight October 1954 on its own. But it will not take the periods. The thing is we write on and you do have a wiki tree browser extension enabled, right? Yes. Okay. We write our our dates differently to you, the people in the States do and some other places possibly. So therefore, you have to have some kind of standard. So you just because if I put if I put 810 something in, I'd expect it to be the 8th of October. Whereas if you put it in, you might expect to be the 10th of August. So, but if I use hyphens instead of periods, it'll take it and it assumes it's in the and I think that's a setup, but it assumes it's the American way with hyphens. So with the wiki tree browser extension, you're you're able to tell it whether you use international date format or American date format. Right. But it still won't do dots. Right. So I'll I'll I'll send a note to Ian about that. Maybe it's trivial. It's just easier for me because I can wail on an adding machine and an ancestry uses dots. And so I've gotten used to that all over the years of all the things I do in ancestry. I do it with a 10 key with the periods. Sure. I'll send a note to Ian about this. Okay. Thank you, Mary. Helps to know people who have friends in high places. And Karen, did you have a question to Karen? I did, but I think I answered it myself while you guys were talking. I was trying to figure out how to add my original personal profile, personal category. And I think I've done it. Okay. Do you want us to look at it and see? No, I can go. Well, you can, but I can go back and look at the recording and see how Betsy did that because I think that she did that on on her demonstration. Right. So it's basically surname, dash, number, and then, you know, that creation category. It's just categories with a semicolon and then my wiki tree ID, right? Yeah. Yeah. And then closing it with brackets. Correct. And then close it. Yeah. So as always, my door is always open. You've seen, you've seen my wiki tree ID many times today because of what we were doing. But feel free to send me a private message with any questions that come up. Yeah, Murray. No, I'm waving bye. Oh, you're waving goodbye. Okay. Well, on that note, I'm going to stop the recording and thank you all for coming. And we'll see you next month. Thanks. Thank you.


What do we do to ensure safety, and that this does not continue to be passed around? Are we having special planning procedures? Are we having special hand washing procedures? Because I've read that Dr. Webb on the website today, and I'm looking forward to you. He said our team is the best in the end of the event, going through the sickness. We're going to push forward because kids can't learn from our school. But Jesus probably looks really good, because what happens is that he's enrolled. Let him count it unserviceable. So Jesus probably looks really good, but in reality that's not what the achievements of the war are. We know having kids from school, we know we have a lot of sick kids. I know they get better sick, and we deal with that. Every year we deal with that. And I understand we've got about 600 kids at home, but I also know we've got about 5,000 at the school. So that's a pretty cool head start.


Hey guys, Robby here again, and today I want to talk to you about how your failures and your weaknesses actually end up being the source of all of your strengths and good qualities. About me in general, what's going on? It's really cool getting back to doing funnels again. It's been like a year and a half since I started doing funnels, you know the first time and selling products. Really enjoying every moment of it. I mean like just the sheer amount of stuff you can put in a funnel, you know, because I was already getting a couple of people every single day just, you know, signing up, getting the book, some of them paying for it. And now I found like a small thing that I could change that when I change it, it's called a double opt-in, like instead of that I will switch to single opt-in.  Yeah, that and like many other cool stuff where you know you see the funny, like you get twice the sales here and twice the sales from that. And I really miss that shit, especially the the passive income part of it, which I am now enjoying. Anyway, your weaknesses are and end up being your strengths.  And I've also met a lot of people whose life would like exploded in terms of amazing heights. People who slept with over 150 girls in a year. People who make over 50,000, 60,000 grand a month without working more than like a couple of hours a day at best. So I really seen, I won't say like the top obviously, but I've seen very high levels of success and also very low, low levels of failure. And there's one common thing between the both of the groups.   So where's the difference? Well, it's pretty simple. The people who failed and just stay there basically, they gained powers. And these powers I've seen ranging from a deep degree of empathy and ability to understand others and ability to enjoy the smaller things in life and appreciation for it.   And they learned from that also things like motivation, hustle, driving yourself. You only get these qualities when you break down.  Same with business. You know, why did I learn it? How did I end up investing over $100,000 when I was just 20, 21 years old taking loans for fuck's sake to learn from mentors and travel to meet them?  And anyway, all these things, all these qualities, they come from failure, not from success. Success, the only thing that success caused me is to be arrogant, is to make mistakes, is to appreciate myself more than I should have, to become a bad friend to people, to become stressed about things. That's what success did for me. And then when I kept on it, it basically turned into failure because the business suddenly crashed because I couldn't take it anymore, because the relationship failed.   I learned peace because everything collapsed in my business.  Where's my money? And being like depressed, not even being able to get out of bed, to some extent. And having that happened, again, my mind broke down. I had to find peace. So I just stopped thinking completely. And that, again, I got because of the pain. Again, same with business, every single lesson I've learned, I've learned either because I applied it and worked amazing. And then when I stopped, I suffered, or because they didn't apply it, I suffered until I started applying it. And I was like, Oh, okay, I know I need to apply it. So pain, suffering, failures, they're all the blessings in disguise that you're looking for.  Suffering means death, because suffering means leading to death. But if you want to be successful, not just in a business way, but having a good life, having peace, having serenity, having good social skills, having deep wisdom, deep understanding of life. It all comes from pain and suffering and failures. Sorry. So I'm not saying necessarily to go after them. Because that's not necessarily the idea. But what I am saying is, there's no such thing as success without a lot of failure.  And then that's going to make you crash even harder. So it's inevitable. And you can escape can't escape it. And I know that so many people are into talk about how do we successful? How do we make it happen?    And the waiting to is the shit, you know, in the bad way. But if they tell you like, you're going to get results quickly, like I do a lot of times.    And I know many people that succeeded and not only in business in all areas of life. So so so always be aware of that and embrace it. Because the more you suffer, the deeper your pain, the more benefits you're going to glean for from it. And that is truly what makes you unique because anyone can make a lot of money. There's no nothing to gain from it in terms of personality in terms of deep fulfillment, because you know, you make more money. Of course, you feel awesome, but it doesn't necessarily affect you on a deep level. But let's say you make a lot of money and then you lose all of it.  There's the opportunity for growth. Because from there you can learn peace, you can learn to be humble, you can learn to appreciate it, you can learn to handle finances better. So accept pain, accept frustration, accept suffering, accept failures, not only as as a necessary evil, but it's actually as the blessing, because the pain will force you to grow. And the scary thing about pain and failure is that we can't control it. So success you think you can control. So you're like, yeah, I want success because success is awesome and I'm going to benefit from it. But when I tell you, hey, if you suffer pain, if you lose a lot of money, you're going to learn how to handle your finances better.  Nobody wants to actually do it because willingly, because you don't know if you're going to get out of it or not.  And that's why in every single piece of content like big course or book I make, or coaching call I make, I always talk about the mistakes you make when you become successful to in the hopes that you will listen and avoid the failure and thus making it unnecessary. Anyway, this is the message for today. I'm shooting off to bed already preparing my trip to Thailand next month. Super excited. And other than that, I'll let you know about the funnel, how everything goes.  And let me know what you think about the video and let me know what's the last failure, big failure that you experienced. Ciao.


What you're doing is something that the National Guard is very good at, but Alaska obviously is a bit of a ways away from Louisiana They need your help. This is something that has been a severe impact for the state Obviously the flooding lack of electricity There's a lot of pain down there and what the Guard does with the military does what the army does is you get there and you help I don't know if this is going to be 14 days 21 days. It could be extended They need your help you volunteered and again, I cannot say anything, but thank you for what you're doing We are ready you guys are resilient and you showing up. That's good for us. It's good for Alaska But of course it's good for the people of Louisiana, and that's really what we're here to do So I am curious how many this is your first time to volunteer for domestic operations for a fire or a flood or anything like that Just about everybody That is incredible. One thing I do again love about the military you raise your right hand You say this will defend and yes, of course that means the United States of America Of course that means Alaska because your guardsman, but in this case what you're helping to defend from a natural disaster Is our fellow citizens in Louisiana? So good on you, and I very much look forward to welcoming you back when you get here Don't language if you need anything You call and we'll make sure you get it sound good All right. Thank you again guys. I appreciate it. Great job. Very proud of you All right safe travels


What's up everybody jason from jazby's case breaks calm.  Of course you're getting a random division guys So only eight spots sold you everybody gets around division at the NFL. I'll know better in common ship. So Here's a dice really here's a customer names a bottom from Oliver Donna Nancy Here's the divisions from the AFC north down the NFC West and Let's roll it and see what you guys get so we got a six and a three for nine times. So good luck nine times one two three four five six seven eight nine nine John Paul at the top down to amber and let's go nine times here one two three four five six seven eight nine nine times NFC North on the NFC West So John Paul you have NFC North Corey with the NFC South Nancy with the AFC East Matt Madeline with the AFC West Matthew with the AFC South Oliver Smith with the AFC North Nancy with the NFC East and amber with the NFC West So if anybody wants to trade guys You guys will have The opportunity to of course all right guys Yeah, anybody want the NFC West if not, I'm gonna close it in 15 seconds. I'll let you guys catch up to the delay All right. Sorry. I'm gonna stick with you up Let me just take this off All right guys. Good luck. So five boxes. Absolutely. All right. Excellent. Oh, that's my first one guys So yeah, most of this is gonna be kind of base So I'm just gonna kind of skim through it, but if we're gonna get anything It's gonna be right in the middle right here Isaiah Simmons Jeff Ocuda Kenneth Murray And we should all just be base cards guys Daryl Taylor Justin Jefferson Little retail green Jay Gluton John Hightower J K Dobbins Cam Acres Jared Judy CD Lam KJ Hamler Isaiah Simmons Joe Burrell Chase Claypool Jalen Hurts a J Dylan John and Taylor Willie Gay Jr. Jordan Love Jalen Ragger Jordan Love Lovisco Zach Moss Jeff Ocuda green Tom Brady James Morgan Anthony Gordon Jordan Brooks Colin Johnson Lombada, you know Benjamin and Chase Clay or sorry chase young Montez Gabriel Davis, Trvon Diggs, Joe Reed, Clyde Edwards-Eler, Kyle Duggar, Devin DuVernay, Ross Blacklock And these all just baseless just skimmed through them Kenneth Murray Chase Claypool Lomago P. Ryan, Devin Patton T. Higgins Johan Jennings Thaddeus Moss, Lomago Hastie, Antoine Winfield Jr., Joshua Kelly, David Arnett, Davidson, Delpit, and Tua Togovaloa Tua's 3-0 guys. Dude hasn't lost yet. And we got a 75 DJ Dallas Antonio Gibson Jared Pinkney, Deandre Swift, Michael Pittman Jr., Henry Ruggs, Tyler Johnson, Brown and Ayuk Donovan Peoples-Jones Little Justin Herbert, and it's kind of sticking up a little bit over there. You see it? I don't know why it's sticking up like that in the back, but It is what it is. I just went there for the Chargers, which would be the AFC West Van Jefferson, Brian Edwards, Tommy Stephens, Jason Huntley, Antonio Gandhi-Golden All right, so these are all rookies, and then we kind of sleep to be top-loaded just so we can continue on But again, I mean you could probably get autographs out of here guys. This is more retail, fat packs, but This is where you have a chance to get the kaboom since they are All across the board with fat packs, hobby and stuff like that. All right guys, good luck. Q-Shawn Vaughn Justin Jefferson Isaiah Simmons, Jeff Ocuda, CJ Henderson, DJ Dallas, Jordan Love, Patrick Queen, Tom Brady, KJ Hamler, Jig from Green, Retail Jordan Love, AJ Dillon, John and Taylor, Colk Matt, Jacob Eason, Jerry Judy, CD Lam, Chase Claypool, Loviska, Zach Moss, little Joe Burrow, Chase Claypool, Benetchie, Joe Reed, Chase Young, Asi Asi, Jadlin Ragger, Jordan Love. All right, second half of the box, guys. Justin Jefferson, Retail Green, DuVernay, Daryl Taylor, Platter was either And Chris Godwin to $1.99, a little Mojo feel, Gallymore, Austin Eckler, Tua, that was crazy, Nick. I was watching it, man. Kaila helped me out with my fantasy, definitely, but I need a more production from Christian Kirk, but It's all good. That was a good game. Michael P. Ryan, Donovan Peoples-Jones, Darius Moss, Asti Winfield, Joshua Kelly, Willie Gay Jr. Jeff Ocuda, Green, little Jay Herbert, All right, next one, I, Kabooms, where are you at? Third box out of five, guys. Good luck. You know, Benjamin, Jordan, Jordan, Jordan, Jordan, Joe Reed, Jared Judi, CD-Lan, KJ Hamler, and wow, out of ten. Look at that, Denzel Mims, little stars, and out of ten. That's like the New York Jets right there, so that is East, right? AFC East, AFC East, Nancy, Chase Young, Green, little insert as well, Jalen Hertz, A.J. Dillon, John M. Taylor, Kirsten Fulton, Ragger, Jordan Lough, Loviska, Zach Moss, little Joe Burrow, Playful, Asi Asi, Chase Young, Rayquan Davis, Lada Ruzila, Jalen Ragger, T. Higgins, I think maybe after you finish your room, Tua, P. Ryan, Jordan Lough, Green, Michael Piman Jr., Henry Ruggs, Tyler Johnson, Brandon Ayuk, Donovan Peoples-Jones, Cole McDonald, Loviska, Joe Burrow introductions, Herbie, Zach Moss, Justin Jefferson, Jeff Okura, All right, so all these will be painted there as well. No, are you guys closed? Oh, really? Oh, my bad, man. All right, guys. Next two. Fourth out of five boxes. Let's see if we can get a kaboom somewhere hiding in here. Jared Pinkney, Brandon Ayuk, Donovan Peoples-Jones, DeAndre Swift-Green, Swift, Michael Piman Jr., Henry Ruggs, and Tyler Johnson. Michael Piman Jr., Herbert, Ruggs, CDL, JK Dobbins, All right, second half of the fourth box, guys. There's another one. Oh, cool things. Tom Brady Green, actually, that's a nice one. Ayuk, Joe Burrow introductions, Peoples-Jones, Claypool, Hertz, A.J. Dillon, Johnathan Taylor, Dadeus Moss, Ragger, Jordan Love, Laviska, Zach Moss, and Joe Burrow. Oh, we got a little red. Debo Sammy on a 149, Antoine Winfield, Gavro Davis, Vladimir Zehler, Joshua Kelly, Johnathan Taylor, T. Higgins. All righty, guys. Last box. Hey, guys, good luck. Joe Burrow, Green, Retail. My bad, there you go. Kamakers, Chase Playpool, Green, KJ Hamler, We got a color car. And how about this? It's Padima Homes, 43 out of 75. Very nice. AFC West. That's going to math. Jalen Hertz, A.J. Dillon, Johnathan Taylor, Jerry Judy, CD Land, Derek Brown, Johnathan Taylor, Laviska, Zach Moss, Joe Burrow, Quinn Seifus, Chase Playpool. I mean, sorry, Chase, I'm sorry. Ragger, Albert, Jordan Love, Jalen Hertz, Green, and Tua. All right, last locker here, guys. Good luck. A.J. Dillon, Bayard Reziler, Johnathan Taylor, Green, T. Higgins, Mahon's Green, Polkman, Ayuk, People's Jones, Jacob Beeson. All right, last couple of rookie inserts here. Swift, Michael Piman, Junior, Henry Ruggs, Tyler Johnson, Yuto Grossmottos, Little Herbie, Jerry Judy, Green. All right, last little stacker here. Simmons, Akuta, and there you go. Rookies over there. And here are the ones that I'll be top loading right now once we finish this video. So no kabooms, but we got some colored cards. If Nick hasn't posted up another one already, I'm going to post it up. I still feel like, hey, this is out of a case, so it could be some potential big hits here. But we've got some numbered cards as well. Rookies, of course, add up. Mahon's numbered here, too. So not too shabby. I mean, we got out of 10, out of 149, out of 75, out of 199, and out of 75. So in five boxes, one, two, three, four, five. So at least one numbered card in a box it looks like. And potentially, like I said, instead of a numbered card, that might be a kaboom, so I appreciate you guys. JasperysKaceBriggs.com.


Attention Ballpark residents. This is a community notification of a new sexually violent predator in your area. Please stay tuned to the following short program for more information. Hi I'm Technician Ron Hackett with the Denver Police Department. The sex offender registration and compliance unit at DPD is responsible for the registration monitoring and tracking of all registered sex offenders and sexually violent predators who live in the city and County of Denver. Here's a brief history of sex offender legislation in Colorado. Our state laws trickle down from federal government mandates. In 1994 we had the Jacob Wetterling Act which mandated that states would establish a sex offender list. Magans law of 1996 said that the public would have access to those sex offender registration lists. The Pam Litchner Act of 1996 stated that some offenders might have to have lifetime registrations. In the Adam Walsh Act of 2006 unified sex offender laws across the country. In Colorado the legislature has determined that sexually violent predators by definition pose a higher risk to the community at large and therefore mandated that upon their release from the Department of Corrections the community must be notified. Sex offender notification in Colorado happens in two ways. The first is passive and ongoing through the sex offender registration process which is a list maintained by local police departments. The second way is active via community notification for those offenders determined to be sexually violent predators by the courts or by the parole board. Most sex offenders in Colorado are supervised by the criminal justice system in our communities. Most sex offenders engage in crossover behavior which means they may have been arrested for one type of crime but be apt to commit another.  There is no typical sex offender but all tend to be deceptive manipulative and secretive. 80 to 93 percent of sex offenses are committed by someone known to the victim. Sexual deviancy begins in mid to late adolescence.  The community has a vested interest in helping offenders to be successfully managed in the community. Sex offenders have the same need for housing and employment as any other citizen.  There are approximately 16,500 registered sex offenders in the state of Colorado. About 65 percent of convicted sex offenders are placed in the community on probation. The remainder are in the department of corrections or community corrections. Offenders may be caught for one type of offense but be at a high risk to commit another type. Crime of conviction is only one indicator of risk.  The offender's residence must be verified quarterly by the Denver Police Department. The full sex offender registration list is available by calling the Denver Police Department Identification Bureau at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Convicted felons and those with multiple convictions are posted online at denvergov.org slash police.   Now, here's a look at the newest sexually violent predator living in Denver. Here's an overview of the registered sex offenders currently living in Denver. There are 2,526 total living within city limits. In Denver Police District 6, there are 508. Precinct 612 has 171 registered sex offenders. Of those, 136 have felony convictions and 35 have misdemeanor convictions. Arnaldo Cruz is a sexually violent predator currently living in Denver. He's 45 years old and was born on September 3, 1974.  He's currently living as a transient in the 1100 block of Park Avenue West in the Ball Park neighborhood of Denver. Schools located within one mile of this offender include Emily Griffith High School and Downtown Denver Expeditionary School, both at 1860 Lincoln Street, University Prep Arapaho Street at 2409 Arapaho Street, Whittier Elementary at 2480 Downing Street, Gilliam School at 2844 Downing Street, Polaris Elementary at 410 Park Avenue West, Montessori Academy of Colorado at 2500 Curtis Street. Parks located within one mile of this offender include Commons Park, Spear Boulevard Park, Sculpture Park, 20th Street Rec Center, Benedict Mountain Park, City of Cuenovaca Park, McIntosh Park, Miastas Park, Creek Front Park, Williams Park, Quick Park, Downtown Playground, Stout Street Children's Park, Denver Skate Park, Pioneer Monument Park, Skyline Park, Ms. Tiso Curtis Park, Lawson Park, Park Avenue Parks, Broadway Triangles, Glenarm Rec Center, Rail Yard Dog Park, Civic Center Park. Recreation centers located within one mile of this offender include 20th Street Rec Center at 1011 20th Street Glenarm Rec Center at 2810 Glenarm Place. Bus routes located within one mile of this offender include Route 8 Park Avenue West and Lawrence Street, Route 38 Park Avenue West and Lawrence Street, Route 44 and 48 Broadway and Arapaho Street. A brief history of charges against this offender. Felony attempted sexual assault overcome victims will. It's not currently on parole and registered with the Denver Police Department on March 10th 2020 as a transient living in the 1100 block of Park Avenue West and the Ball Park neighborhood of Denver. Past charges against this offender include failure to register as a sex offender. Arnoldo Cruz has been determined a sexually violent predator after meeting the following criteria. Criteria one age 18 or older on the date of the offense or under 18 and tried as an adult. The offender was age 28 at the time of the offense. Criteria two the crime must have been committed honor after July 1st 1997 and convicted honor after July 1st 1999.  The offender was convicted on February 7th 2003 for attempted sexual assault overcome victims will. Criteria three the relationship to the victim was one of the following. Victim was a stranger to the offender or the offender established or promoted a relationship with the victim primarily for the purpose of sexual victimization. The victim was a 24 year old female. The offender was known to the victim. Criteria four positive results are the passing of a risk assessment instrument administered by probation parole staff and a qualified treatment evaluator. Positive results include an assessment for the presence of a mental abnormality, a level of denial regarding the offense, treatment appropriateness and motivation, presence of sexual deviant interests. The offender was evaluated by the Denver County courts with positive results determining him to be a sexually violent predator.


Poverty is our natural state. Before capitalism, and I know this is not, I mean, the Marxists know this, because Karl Marx actually admitted this, but other than that, most people don't know this. Before capitalism, what were 99% of people? Poor, everybody was poor. So, for example, today, the UN defines extreme poverty as, I think, $2 a day or less. How many people lived a $2 a day or less in 1750? Extreme poverty, I mean, imagine today, and we're talking about equal dollars, so I'm not playing an inflation game, right? I mean, you couldn't live a $2 a day or less but in 1750, how many people in England lived a $2 a day or less? Yeah, basically, 90-something percent. Everybody was poor. And that's true throughout human history, so if you've got like 100,000 years throughout that entire period, with a few exceptions, maybe in Greece and Rome, where people got a little bit wealthier for a little period of time, everybody's lived a $2 a day or less forever. And then we had this amazing thing happen called freedom, capitalism, the Industrial Revolution, a portion of that. And suddenly, we became relatively rich.


Ryan Murphy's latest Netflix project brings Sarah Paulson to a colorful yet gruesome hospital in a prequel to one flew over the cuckoo's nest. If you're avoiding spoilers, don't worry the first half of my review is completely spoiler-free and I will tell you when to turn away for when I do discuss the spoilers. Also tomorrow I will be uploading a second Ratchet video regarding the future of the show itself so make sure you're subscribed with your bell notifications on. Before we begin I just wanted to let you know that I restarted my Patreon so if you want to support me and receive some cool perks like early access to videos and some new exclusive merch watch to the end of the video or check it out right now at patreon.com slash Skyler Gaetano so let's get started with the review. Going into Ratchet I wasn't sure what to expect. While I've enjoyed Ryan's Netflix shows thus far none of them have really lived up to the quality of say American Horror Story, Crime Story, Feud or even Scream Queens so while my expectations were lower than they would be of a new AHS season they were a bit higher than they were going into say Hollywood or the politician given this stellar cast led by none other than Sarah Paulson. Let's just get this out of the way. Season one of Ratchet is not the most amazing season of television Ryan Murphy Productions has created and I'm not going to pretend that it is groundbreaking in any way but with that being said I did actually thoroughly enjoy my viewing experience. I think tackling a similar tone as AHS with similar actors and similar scenarios this show could have easily read as an in-house rip-off and I won't lie certain scenes do feel like they're lifting from asylum and even elements of freak show visually it is also very reminiscent of Scream Queens season two with that mint green hospital setting and similar set design there are also a few scenarios that are reminiscent of scenarios in Scream Queens as well but I suppose we could have predicted that given that Ian Brennan wrote a majority of the scripts for both Ratchet and the second season of Scream Queens but Ratchet does really shine in the aspects of it that are not derivative of the showrunner's previous works the characters while some do lack much depth are all very intriguing and memorable and every actor that participated in the show delivered great performances no surprise here but Sarah Paulson lit up every single scene that she's in and commanded the whole season to the point where when she wasn't in certain scenes I felt like I was just counting down the seconds until she was back on my screen. Jon Jon Breona's work here was also stellar I've only seen him in the assassination of Gianni Versace and apocalypse before this and this was very easily my favorite performance of his there are a lot of crazy things that happen in the show particularly with Dr. Hanover and Breona's controlled his performance to not give into the campy or insane places that the story was taking him other actors performances I think are also worth noting are Cynthia Nixon as Gwendolyn Judy Davis as Nurse Bucket and Sophie Okanido as Charlotte while the tone of the season does jump into territories of horror drama romance and comedy I wouldn't call it tonally confused as each relationship and character stays in their lane the comedic characters stay comedic the romantic relationships are realistic and the horror is consistently gruesome each episode does bring each of these elements into play so it does feel like a healthy and intentional mixture for me the season hit its peak right in the middle with episodes 4 and 5 and while it didn't entirely fizzle after episode 5 it never managed to reach the high that it was on it is at this point of the review that I will be discussing spoilers so turn away if you have not seen the show all right so now let me just give you a brief rundown of what I thought of each episode as well as my rating of each episode right off the bat the first episode diverted my expectations hitting me with some graphic gore and intensely stunning cinematography while the episode was beautiful and intriguing it did leave me wanting more so I gave episode one six and a half out of ten episode two continued with the exposition of episode one that began setting things into motion and this is where I really began to fall in love with the characters the peach scene in this episode is the most memorable peach scene since call me by your name and I gave this episode seven and a half out of ten episode three to me just served as a setup to episode four but I guess it wasn't entirely filler so I gave it seven out of ten episode four blew me away the formula of the show worked its best in this episode and all I wrote for this when I was watching was wow nine out of ten episode five was nearly as great as the episode before it but it suffered a bit in the first half with a little bit of unnatural pacing but the focus on charlotte was very important to the last half of the season but once the dance itself kicked off this was easily one of the highlights of the seasons I loved getting to see drunk bucket and the scene where mildred and Gwen comfort bucket and then damn that final scene of the dance was not at all what I was expecting and it is at this point in the season where things really start to shock me it goes all in with trying to achieve shock value I gave episode five eight and a half out of ten episode six provided even more backstory to edmund and mildred's relationship but overall it felt like late exposition that could have either been dealt with earlier or in a quicker manner it slowed down the pace for me and felt a tad bit like a filler episode six and a half out of ten episode seven the penultimate episode further built the friendship between bucket and ratchet that started to form at the dance and I'm really glad these characters didn't spend the entire season at each other's throats I also loved the early scene with bucket and louise and then charlotte killed dr hanniver and I was not expecting him to die at all and definitely not in that scene I'm a little sad that we won't be seeing that character in future seasons but maybe they'll incorporate him in flashbacks of some sort as long as it serves the story that is and then the nori gets stabbed with a pitchfork which I was also not expecting at all came out of nowhere it was at this point that the shock factor gave me a bit of whiplash and I thought well all bets are off which lowered the stakes for me a bit but in the end I did give this episode an eight out of ten and now episode eight the finale it continued the shock value from the gruesome electric chair scene to the sudden death of huck I know I haven't talked about huck yet because he really didn't do much this season but he didn't have to die like that I would have liked to see more of his character going forward but I do respect the show for killing off so much of its main ensemble in the first season then a dreaded ryan murphy finale time jump occurs and we are in mexico in 1950 the finale fizzles here for me and although I do love that mildred has found love with Gwen and Gwen seems to be surviving for the next season the last act of the finale doesn't really do much for me so I gave episode eight and eight out of ten overall I'd give ratchet season one seven mildred ratchets out of ten but be sure to let me know what you thought about it in the comments below I think the season was strong and I am looking forward to what is to come with the series speaking of once again tomorrow I will be uploading a second video on ratchet regarding the future of the series so look out for that make sure your bell notifications are on


So, we're continuing with Cricket on the Sports Fact Zone. Westonis dominated the second half of their three-day warm-up encounter against a Cricket Australia 11 in Adelaide to lead by 214 runs with one day to play. Passing a second time, the Windys ended on 137 for three with Joshua De Silva on 55 and Kevin Hodge, who scored a half-century in the first innings on 44. Earlier in the day, the West Indians dismissed Cricket Australia 11 for 174 on the back of a terrific post-launch period where they grabbed six for 22. There were two wickets each for Kemal Rhotel, Zari Joseph and Shamar Joseph. Waila Kim Jordan, Justin Graves, Kudakesh Moji and Kevin Sinclair claimed a wicket each. While the man who captured most attention though was the 24-year-old Shamar Joseph with his spell of 2 for 28 in eight overs, the guy needs bold with ferocious space and in one headline of the Cricket Australia website, he's described as the quick from nowhere who has revived memories of Windy's greats. Joseph spoke after the day's play. Alright, so who is Shamar Joseph and of course how did he garner so much attention of the regional cricketing body? So let's get some answers now from the guy on a cricket board president, Visundi Asingh who joins us this afternoon via Zoom. Good afternoon, how are you? Yeah, good afternoon to you and your viewers also. I'm fine. Alright, so let's talk about the man of the moment, Shamar Joseph. Talk to me about one, how he got involved in crickets, of course, how the guy on a cricket board was able to spot his talent and he's been doing great things, of course, on his debut. Alright, so let me start by saying Shamar is only 24 years old and he was born in a place named Barakara in Burbis. This is two hours from New Amsterdam, so let me tell you where is New Amsterdam, it's about all from Georgetown. So all from Georgetown and then two hours from New Amsterdam and this is the Barakara and you go there by a boat, you can't go driving there. He played not too much, but maybe about a year or so for Tugbaard clubs. The Tugbaard Park cricket club is the same club where Romare Shepard and Niall Smith play as far. So he was just somebody coming out playing a one or two matches there and then he never played for Burbis or anything for guy and either you would level or anything, just playing cricket because he loved it. He was a security guard then. He left the security service in 2022 and moved to Georgetown hoping that someone will see him and identify his talent. And so we used to be training in Georgetown at the Georgetown cricket club, Romare border and he would come around and ask to join in that session with the contracted players. And we also have what you call emergent players, there are 15 contracted players and the GCB put together another 13 who we believe can challenge the other 15 to get their contract. So he came in and joined just like that. So if you can get an opportunity to bowl, so he started just like that, playing with the emergent players. So Romare Sarwan, who is our chairman of SELECTO, apparently he was looking at this guy and said, you know, this is something we got to deal with now. So we brought him in as an emergent player in 2022, well the ending part of 2022. So we brought him also in the Interconti, well let me explain what Interconti, Interconti is three countries competing for supremacy and what we do, we add a next team to that three teams because there are a lot of players who get left off from their countries and they could possibly make a guy on a team. And so what we do, we form another team and call it SELECTO 11. So Shamar played for SELECTO 11 and the selection panel decided that he's good enough to make a guy on a side. However, on the trip going up to the West Indies tournament after he made the 4-day, the Super 50, we had a little problem getting a spot for him. However, the GCB invested and we got the permission from the guy on the cricket board so that he could tour with the team, he could practice with the team and so on. He can't play. After that we had an injury, it all runs forbidden and he joined the squad. So from that, the rest is no history, you know where he is. Right and when you saw him play, what was special about this player in your view? When you look at Shamar Joseph, right, you would believe that he come to the cricket and assistant. He was everything clean, neat, good ball in action, strong, fit, always ready to train and we have a rigorous training program and this was kind of surprising with fitness level. He was in the top three, you know and so we also, you know by now the territorial boards have a strength and conditioning coach, we are now receiving the services of state-of-the-art gym and Shamar goes there almost at every opportunity to ensure that he is fit. I see a huge future of Shamar, I mean Guyana and I believe we are proud of him. The same thing when he practiced with the Amazon Warriors, it's just a matter of time when he made the team. President, how excited are Guyana's cricket fans though about Shamar because Guyana doesn't have a tradition of producing outstanding fast bowlers. There are other Caribbean countries that can boast producing fast bowlers more than the Guyanese can. I know Colin Croft would probably jump up and say something to me now but generally speaking Guyana produces outstanding spinners and batters. How excited are the Guyana cricket fans about the prospects of this fiery pacer? Very very much, I mean Shamar is special, I mean arriving from just one and a half year never played you cricket and just burst out on the scene like that, I mean it's like an amazing thing that actually happened to Guyana cricket and I'm sure all our cricket fans are proud of Shamar Joseph. And talk to us about the trajectory because at the moment there are a lot of Western is cricket fans who are disappointed that the image of West Indies fast bowling has tempered over the decades. Of course coming from the 70s and 80s when there were fearsome West Indies fast bowlers. Do you see Shamar as the kind of bowler that can rekindle some of that fire in West Indies fast bowling? It's just a matter of time, you could say it's just a matter of time. I once gave him the opportunity, I don't think anyone could stop him. See the key thing is that Shamar keeps fit, he's right, he's very disciplined and obedient. For example we have an open door policy at GCB and every time Shamar gets the opportunity he will give us a call and check in to see what he's doing wrong or what he can do right or how he could improve and so on. I don't see anyone stopping him. Yeah he is clearly a tremendous talent and I notice performances for the West Indies A team on the South Africa tour as well. I was watching an interview with him today and he was saying that a few of the youngsters in Australia came up to him with pictures from his performances in South Africa and he was saying I don't know how they got those pictures but clearly they are fans of myself and that was quite interesting because I think that says a lot about the quality that he has shown in the short time that he's been on that level but also the fact is this young man has only played five first class matches and I'm sure Mr. President there must have been some dissenting voices in Guyana about why he's been elevated to a number of these positions with very very limited first class experience. If there is any maybe very very little. Shamar Joseph is a great find and you enjoy watching him play cricket and he's a guy if he makes mistakes you try to find out why and the way he's disciplined the way he carries himself I am sure that he's going to make a lot of friends in the world. Yeah for sure he is a tremendous talent the West Indies to play Australia in the first step starting on Tuesday which by the way will be live on Sportsmax and the expectation now is that he will make his test debut and of course the partner Alzar Joseph and Kimar Roach. I want to get from you Mr. President because on one end on the rise of Guyana's cricket we're talking about Shamar Joseph a number of other Guyana's players in the various West Indies setups and at the same time one of the most talented Guyana's players Shimran Hetmire know on the outside looking in. I want to get how disappointed you are as president that someone with the quality of a Shimran Hetmire is not quite living up to that in West Indies colors. Look Shimran is quite young and I think there's a lot of room for elevation again. Every player at some point in their game they would have a bad patch and I do hope that this is the case so we're not ruling out anything from Shimran and I think that there's only a matter of time once you get this concentration and all the dots line up in the right order I'm sure he'll be back. Shimran is a real classy player and there's just a matter of time. Yeah of course yes he is 27 years old so you are right there is very much time I know that you said earlier that you have an open door policy at the GCB is either type of player that would reach out to you or that you could reach out to and have conversations with him to see what's going on and if there is any way the GCB can help him get back to a level that I think all Caribbean cricket lovers would love to see. We actually do actually one time the entire board met with Shimran and so when we have these meetings we allow the players to do much of the talking so you hear clearly what's going on on the outside and that's why I'm telling you from an informed position I think it's just a matter of time. Shimran has his heart in the right place and he likes playing cricket he wants to play for his country he loves West Indies cricket and so I as I'm saying it's just a matter of time and every player I see why this spot like this on Shimran because the expectation is extremely high and so that's why people might feel a bit disappointed but he's just a normal human being like all of us and he's entitled to mistakes so I guess it's just a matter of time before Shimran is back at the top there. Yeah Miss Undil Singh it's a pleasure speaking with you thanks for giving us a little bit more information on Shamar Joseph who has left tongues wagging down under with the first test approaching between West Indies and Australia thanks very much for chatting with us and we'll chat again soon I'm sure. Thank you it's a pleasure for having me. Thank you very much. Lance Mariah this warm-up encounter between the West Indies and the Cricket Australia 11 West Indies leading by 214 runs I quickly want to get your opinion it's set to be 35 degrees Celsius on the third and final day so extremely hot if you are in the position of Andre Coley who is the head coach would you be looking to push for a victory would you be looking to get your bowlers back out there for a second opportunity or would you be saying to the team let's just bat as long as possible and call it an early day ahead of the first test. Well there are a couple of things that we've got to look at here and one of the pluses for this squad for me is a lot has been made of the fact that they're inexperienced and there are seven on-capped players in the squad but the plus side of having so many on-capped players is that the Aussies know very little about them and I say that to say this that they are now playing in the warm-up match there was a time when teams would actually hide some of these players in a tour match because they are going to play them in the test match and they don't want the opposition to work them out too much so I don't know if that would be part of the consideration for Andre Coley exactly how he enters the final days play because the Aussies would have seen some players that they know very little of and would be making their notes based on what they're seeing here so I think those those factors may influence what the West Indies decides to do on on the final day but as I said at the start no one is disputing that Australia will be whose huge favorites to win this series because they are the best in the world the West Indies are ranked 8 in the world and this is not even the strongest West Indies team on paper so the odds don't favor them here but I still think there are times when you have some on-capped players who have the stomach for the occasion they may not have the experience and all of the technique to survive but if the temperament is right and they've got the stomach for the for the battle they could you know show themselves to be a lot more competitive than than many people think so I'm awaiting to see how the series develops but this has been an important fixture for them and I think they would come out of this regardless of what happens on the final day with with some level of confidence even though they would know that the Australian 11 is gonna be completely different and stronger than this cricket Australia squad yeah I think this practice match Ricardo and Lance was very very important for these on-capped players to get their feet wet for them to realize you know what type of opposition they will be against and I'm pretty sure because what usually happens with young players getting opportunities like this because I belong to a home so where I remember when Karishma got her first opportunity what they tend to do is because they're young you know they're bright-eyed they're getting this opportunity against players is that they only dreamt about playing against and Shamar said that about Kimar Roach in his interview he said you know he always admired watching Kimar Roach and to have the opportunity is such an honor to play alongside him so I think these youngsters are going to do their research they're gonna come out you know all guns blazing and I think their confidence is going to be right where we want it to be now the execution part is something that we'll have to wait to see but for me getting their feet wet in this practice match was very very important and I have to say the on-capped players they've impressed me I've said that already because to be playing on your first day it's easy to make excuses it's easy to get away with errors because we'll say they're new you know give them another opportunity but they have gotten to this setup team and they have already you know put their name out Shamar Joseph is the one we're talking about and it's his first game yeah a couple of things one to the point that Mariah ended on and Lance you made the point as well we have seen in the past where we've seen West Indies teams selected on the harsh situations previously because senior players went on strike remember 2005 when Dinesh Ramdin came to the four on that Sri Lanka tour was because a number of the senior players came on strike Kimar Roach the most successful West Indies fast bowler of the last 15 years he came into the setup because the senior players went on strike for that Bangladesh tour in 2009 2021 Karl Mears in that Bangladesh tour in Krum Abana got an opportunity in that tour as well he averages 38 in test cricket so we've seen from time to time those shining lights and yeah 2021 because of COVID-19 yeah and a few of the players deciding not to go so we've seen shining lights in the past in situations like that where quote unquote on the strength West Indies teams have been selected I don't doubt that we will see a similar situation maybe it will be Shamar Holder maybe it will be Kevin Sinclair Shamar Joseph apologies maybe it will be Kevin Sinclair maybe it will be somebody else so yes there is always that possibility and I I don't doubt that someone will come to the party last year Taysh Narayan Chandu Paul on his debut tour of Australia performed creditably took on the Australian fast bowlers in his first test match with a half century and a 45 he returns this time around hopefully he'll be able to perform even better even though he hasn't shown in the warm-up matches to Mariah's point though and I want to caution because I think this is so critical this is a pretty average cricket Australia 11 average age 23 years old there's only one player I think we have the batting 11 there's only one player in this cricket Australia 11 who has any sort of test experience and that's the captain Peter Hanscom I think we're going to get that squad shortly with 20 test matches outside of that no test experience average age 23 years old as I pointed out here you have it you have hands come with 166 first-class matches Doran has 66 first-class matches and then look at the others 28, 19, 5, 9, 3, 2, 4 so tremendous inexperience it is a youthful side as well and so I don't want us to get too carried away with the performance of the West Indies against these players because I don't think that the quality is great and I think there are many regional teams that you could put together that would run this cricket Australia team to the wire if not beat them in three and four day games so I think we have to be really cautious in how we assess the performances against this lineup and I find that especially the bowling lineup is especially inexperienced and that the quality that our batsmen will face against Australia is going to be drastically different Lance and Mariah. I get what you're saying but for me it's like you just have to give the players the confidence right now against the opposition that they are put to play against so for me they could have gone against the same young team and of course flopped Ricardo it could have been serious trouble that's the point I'm making so they have this opposition to face they went with no experience at all they were able to put some runs on the board and don't get me wrong the batting has been poor for the West Indies a lot of single digits a lot of the players that I expect to step up not stepping up so I get what you're saying but for me you know there are a few bright lights I don't expect it to be the same when they go up against the Australia team the big team but of course as it stands today I'm going to say I'm still proud of what I saw the effort against the Australia 11. I just want to say quickly that this West Indies team even if you take out the likes of a Craig Brathwaite and Akimah Roach probably has more experience more first-class experience than this cricket Australia 11 and that's what that's the point I really want to make with the quality of this cricket at the risk of playing devil's advocate though no you can Australia's cricket is pretty deep and although these players are young and inexperienced they'll be good Australian cricketers as long as there are solid players in their Sheffield Shield domestic they can play cricket so I think there is some quality there even though they're inexperienced and young but I accept that the Australian test team that the West Indies will face next Tuesday is probably 10 times better than this team and I guess maybe that's the point you're trying to make. Well some would say the lack of quality was shown when West Indies took 6 for 22 after lunch on day two and the cricket Australia 11 ended bowled out for 174. Are we out of time for this segment? Yeah we've been out of time. Yeah we're sending lands at the track.