Can you believe these ravens are sitting at 7 and 3 right now or top of their division in the AFC North and they could possibly pot it still early but they are actually competing for a number one overall spot. I know it's going to take some help if they're going to get there. But anyway, it's still some people who are not sold on the Ravens yet. Now, can you believe that? Well, I can and I know a lot of Ravens fans ain't even sold on the Ravens for a couple of different reasons. But we're going to look at some reasons that my guide Julius listed. But first and foremost, I got to give a special shout out to the Team Keep It Clean patrons and the Team Keep It Clean channel members. Appreciate y'all for showing extra support to the channel. Thank you. If any of y'all would like to become a Team Keep It Clean patron or channel member, then you can go. It's all down below in the description. All that stuff is down there. Everything is down there as a matter of fact. But regardless, if you want to cool, if you don't want to, that's cool too. I love y'all. Let's get into this first question from Julius and he says, still not sold. Hey, Raven, as always, I would like to thank you for the content. I have a confession to make. I know John brought back the 2012 Super Bowl team to bring some encouragement and have a mind reader on that Monday night game. But I'm just not so that the Ravens really have a good grip on personnel packages and game preparation and execution. Too many players on a roster are not utilized or used at their best talent in situational football schemes. Can't argue that, man. But anyway, he said, example, on the drop pass by record, why not have that be Duvenay? Why not line up likely next to Andrews, the Marcus plus Duvenay outside with Justice Hill? You forced the defense to commit. It's always this simple scheme where it's easy for the defense to defend the play or rally to the ball quickly. I remember back when Cam Cameron had gotten fired because they felt as if he was too conservative and they wanted to see more explosive plays. Same we find our team in the same situation. Where's the explosiveness? Where's the big runs in 2019? What happened? We used to be dominant winners. I feel as though maybe Steve needs to bring Ozzy back. Well, I mean, Ozzy ain't going nowhere. Ozzy's still in the building. He's right there. So yeah, he ain't leave. He said that's really the only X factor between the 2019 season and now? Well, no, the 2019 season, that was Eric DeCosta. He was a GM back then. But anyway, he said it's not about the draft picks. It's not about a number one wide receiver. Raven never prioritized that never. It was always about personnel and scheme. Think about it. Rex Ryan had great utilization of personnel and packages. Kubiak, literally the personnel packages had Joe looking like he had bounced back. Really? Who was on top of that? It was Ozzy. Maybe Greg needs more assistance and putting the right personnel together. On a better note, my guy, babyface Mike McDonald has really dialed into his craft and is really bringing back the true spirit of the Baltimore Ravens defense. Give that man his flowers. Oh yeah, for sure. What's your thoughts on the game and the utilization of personnel? I think it's definitely a cause for concern. We've seen it too many times when Ravens will have somebody get hot. They'll get hot in one game and in the next game, they just, they don't even get a shot. And it's not even, like it'd be one thing if it's like, oh man, the defense, they really taking this guy out the game. But a lot of times the Ravens will end up taking the guy out of the game. And it'll be like, what's going on? What's happening? Um, and there's still like, it's, it's, it's, what do dovenay is probably the biggest question mark for me. Because I'm just very confused and concerned over the usage or lack thereof when it comes to Devin Duvenay. Um, we just don't see him used consistently and keep saying it.  Now, I hope, but it is the business. It's the NFL. It's the business. I would hope that Devin Duvenay, but this is what it looks like. But I would hope that this is not true, but it is business. So, but I would hope that Devin Duvenay is not getting the Gus Edwards treatment to where they keep his numbers down. Cause he's in, he's not in the contract yet, but he'll be eligible to get paid after this year. If you keep his numbers down, you could be like, Hey, and I mean, I remember Lamar Jackson a couple years ago, he called Devin Duvenay a secret weapon. And boy, that, that's secret. It was a secret for two more years until now. Um, but anyway, with Devin Duvenay, uh, is he could be paid this year after this year. Uh, and then they can give him a little, they can give him a little deal, a little extension. Um, but if you keep his numbers down and it'll be cheaper than if you let them numbers go up. Now I don't know if that's the case. I would hope not cause that would be like, that would hinder your team. That would be hindering your team. That would not be making these Baltimore Ravens the best Baltimore Ravens you possibly could, but it is the business. So I can't put it past nobody. Um, but it's just a lot of, sometimes it could be a lot of misuse of guys and non usage of guys.  Now the difference with Pat Ricard and Devin Duvenay, obviously one is a wide receiver one. And the other one is sort of do it all type of guy. Pat Ricard being that wide receiver one, Devin Duvenay, Devin Duvenay. But anyway, um, if that would have been Devin Duvenay on that wheel route, then he would have got a lot more attention than a Pat Ricard. Like Pat Ricard, people not really stunting Pat Ricard like that. Um, they're like, oh, that's a fullback. He going out, he got a chance to probably possibly make a catch, but we ain't really stun them like that. But if it's a wide receiver, um, going to, well, another wide receiver like Devin Duvenay going out there, um, then he will get a lot more attention. But yeah, man, it's definitely a concern. Um, and Raven's like, again, I know you said you're still not sold and I can understand why Raven's like, I think the biggest way that they're going to be able to sell. Uh, sell this team and make people be sold on them. Um, obviously the defense keep doing what they've been doing. Uh, the offense keep doing what they're doing, but really, uh, playoff time and playoff time is that's going to be the time when they, they'll really be able to show like, all right, they, they are for real. Now, of course, with your record, they seven and three. So that's a beautiful thing. They've won, uh, seven games. They lost three in every single game they've had a double digit lead. So I do think they are a competitor. I do think they are a competitive team. I think they are, they, they are leaning on the side of contender. Um, for, for sure, uh, cause cause they had double digit leads even when they weren't clicking like they've been clicking now. Um, so with them cleaning a lot of stuff up, that's a good sign. So I would put them in the contender category. Um, but it's weird cause I like, I feel like they are contender. I'm not completely so, but they are contender. But again, playoffs playoffs is going to answer literally every single question that we really have about this team moving forward. Yeah. So team keep it clean. Welcome to another episode of questions from subs. There's a series where you can ask any question you want to and we answer in the video just like this. Now, um, I was just telling one of my guys the other day cause he hit me up. He was like, Hey, did you, did you forget about the question, man? And I told him like, look, we, we can't do every single question. Uh, cause we get a lot of questions for the patrons, for the patrons. We do every question for the patrons. Um, but as far as all the emails and stuff, we can't always do every single one. We have done about 99.99% of all the emails, but there's sometimes when we just, we can't. So I appreciate the fact that y'all are patient. Y'all bear with me. Y'all have just been part of the process cause it's a lot of work. It's a whole lot of work. Um, but thank you all for being patient. Thank you all for rocking with us. Thank you all for just being y'all. So anyway, next question came from the copper for he said, what's up brother? It's at that point in the year that we should have a good enough idea to play off picture. I wouldn't say that. I see what you're saying, but it's like so much could change from now until the end of the year. But anyway, you said I'm confident that the Ravens will be able to put away the majority of the teams we have left to face to, to secure a place in the playoffs. But man, considering Lamar's track record and playoffs, should we be expecting another first or second round exit? If we can't change the narrative, then I can't see myself tuning into the playoffs unless we make the conference finals. Love from Australia, man. Hashtag Ravens flock less fly. See, I don't believe that. I don't believe that. So you're telling me if we don't at least make it to the conference finals, then you ain't going to be watching the playoffs? Man, you just talking. You're going to be watching every single Ravens playoff game. Hopefully you get to see four of them or five of them. I have a many of them. I think four. That would be to get to the Super Bowl. But anyway, you're going to be right there locked in. But yeah, it's it's crazy because with with the playoff record, maybe like old Lamar is well one in three. I think it is. It's like, I'm not saying that you do it, but I know a lot of with media. They'll be like, ah, QB wins. Q wins is a team stat. They'll be like, wins is a team stat. It's not a QB stat. It's a team stat. But then when it comes to playoffs, they'll be like, oh, Lamar, he's one in three. But anyway, the Ravens, they got to be better in the playoffs. They got to be better in the playoffs. Lamar got to be better. The offensive line got to be better. The run game got to be better. The pass game got to be better. The receivers got to be better. Coaching got to be better. They need to if they get there this year, which they should, but if they get there this year, they need to be prepared. I think that's been the Ravens biggest thing. They just have not been prepared and it shows. Next question came from Tavon. And I like how we getting some questions from some new people that we don't really get questions from. So I appreciate y'all. He said, good evening, Raven. First, let me start. I truly enjoyed the channel and the content you put out. Hey, I appreciate it. Tavon, thank you. He said, here's my question. I've heard you say plenty of times, basically the Ravens are creatures of habit. Every time we've won, the Super Bowl has been on the back of a stellar defense and an offense that can get by not in 2012. That offense was definitely not just an offense that could get by. They had weapons everywhere at every level. They had Ray Rice, Young Running Back. They had Vonte Leach blocking the way. They had a good offensive line and they just made a switch at the offensive line doing at the playoffs. But they had Anquan Bolden as a good veteran receiver. Then they had Tori Smith as the this very young, speedy wide receiver. And they had Jacoby Jones who was like right in the middle of both of those two. He wasn't like a veteran veteran, but he wasn't like this super, super young guy. But playmaker, playmaker. But anyway, and Dennis Pitter, I ain't trying to go through the whole list. But he said, the way this season is currently shaping up, it appears the organization is trying to follow the same formula. Do you think the organizational beliefs are that that's the only way to win, hence the hesitation to be aggressive with offensive players like they do with defensive players? Thank you in advance for taking my question and keep doing what you're doing. Hey, I appreciate it, man. Yeah, I mean, yeah, I definitely think that the Ravens, they want to win their way. Now, it's funny because I was listening to a conversation with Stephen A. Smith and Keyshawn Johnson. And I love the conversation because they both brought out great points. But one of the biggest things that they were talking about was philosophy. Keyshawn Johnson was like, this is what the Ravens do. He's like, they're winning, they're 7-3 right now. They've been making the playoffs all these years. He said that this is their philosophy. This is who they are. They want to run the ball, play good defense. And he was like, in the playoffs, when you run the ball and play good defense, he said, that's what truly wins you playoff games. But Stephen A. Smith was like, hold up. Yeah, this has been their philosophy, but what has it gotten them in the playoffs? Have they been winning in the playoffs? No, they certainly haven't. So wouldn't you want to change something with that? So I just love the back and forth that they were having because they each brought out really, really good points. But I do really believe that, like you mentioned, I think the Ravens really feel like their way is their way. And that's what they're going to do. So, hey, come play off time. We're going to see how it works out. Hopefully it does. We'll see. Relax, people. Next question came from another new person sending the question. Luffy. He said, what's up in Graven? I've been watching it for a while, but this is my first question. If I had a channel around the time, Lamar got drafted and I never really wanted to keep up with the team as extensively as I do now. Until I watch your videos. Thank you, man. For real. Seriously, that's special. I appreciate that. He said, I like the way you explain things while adding humor. I like the way you explain things while adding humor to your commentary and your ransom. I appreciate you, man. He said, last week, I said on the stream that Marcus Williams and Roke on Smith reminded me of the old Ed Reid and Ray Lewis. I didn't mean that they play like them. What I meant was that they're this 2022 version of them regarding the championship team. Everyone has been comparing the 2012 championship Ravens with the Joe Fleckles contract situation to this year's team and Lamar's contract situation. All I'm saying is that they are out. They are our premier defensive playmakers just as a 2012 team had theirs. Another small comparison that also reminds real quick before we move on. Yeah, Marcus Williams. Man, this defense is playing excellent. They didn't even got Marcus Williams back yet. Bowser's still coming into his own. Ajago ain't even hit the scene yet. But Marcus Williams is out, man. If only we could turn off injuries. We could just turn off injuries just for one season, man. Oh boy. Anyway, he said another small comparison that also reminds me of the essence of the 2012 team is Jacoby Jones and Duvenay. But I think they are purposely not giving due opportunities because they didn't expect him to have a jump like this to help out Lamar. So in order to keep his number down, they don't play duv now. Believe. I know we need a number one, but Lamar so talented. I believe he could get it done with Duv, Mark and Robinson granted that Bateman is out and with the help of Gus and JK. See, he talking about the business right there with dude. He said these pieces are enough to get there and compete because we have Lamar Jackson. But the number one receiver is total domination. Appreciate you for being you. Love watching your progress. And just like Marcus Peters, sadly, I'm out. He ain't got to do MP like that, man. He ain't do nothing to you, man. But I appreciate that. That was a fun read. So thank you. But yeah, man. Yeah, the whole receiver thing, we know how that goes. We'll see what happens next year. But yeah, Marcus Williams, it's gonna be nice when he comes back, man. It's gonna be nice.  I mean, a cast on his hand, not a boot. A boot is for feet. But if he gonna come back with a cast on his hand or what, I'm just really curious to see how that goes. But I'm very excited for him to return. Yeah, Roquan Smith. And again, we know that they're not Ray Lewis and Ed Reid. They can't be like that's that's unfair to ask them to be those.  And they haven't even got a chance to play together yet.


So this lecture is part of an online algebraic geometry course on schemes and will be about linear systems. So a linear system of divisors is a sort of geometric way of defining sections of sheaves used in the days before sheaves have been invented. So people were sort of implicitly working with sheaves back in the early days of algebraic geometry, but just using a different language for it. So we'll just work with, we'll take our varieties X to be non-singular projective varieties over an algebraically closed field. You can do this in more generality, but you get some minor extra complications that I don't want to think about. So we recall that a divisor is more or less the same thing as an integral linear combination. So we might take some of N, I, P, I, N, I and Z of irreducible co-dimension one sub varieties, P, I. For instance, for a curve, the P, I would just be points in a divisor is a collection of points with multiplicities where the multiplicities are possibly negative. So if you call the divisor D is effective, means all the N, I greater than or equal to zero. So it's more or less a sub variety of co-dimension one, except again you're allowed multiplicities. And now a complete linear system of a variety D naught is equal to all effective divisors that are linearly equivalent to D zero. So what this means is that it's the set of order visors D such that D minus D zero is equal to F for some function F. You remember this is the divisor of zeros, whereas usually you count a pole as being a zero of negative order. So we can rephrase this in terms of line bundles. Suppose L naught is the line bundle of D naught. So the line bundle of D naught is the one whose sections F are just rational functions whose poles are most D naught. In other words, this means F plus D naught is greater than or equal to zero. This means it's effective. So remember saying a divisor is at least zero is just the same as saying all its multiplicities are at least zero, which is the same saying it's effective. In other words, if we map any function F to D, which is F, so that should be round brackets there, F plus D naught, then this bit here is an effective divisor. So we get a map. So from global sections of L naught to divisors equivalent to D naught, so effective divisors, which is just the linear system. And furthermore, if you've got two global sections F and G, then F and G have the same divisor. It's just the same as saying F is equal to lambda G for lambda some nonzero element of K. So what we do is we get the set of the linear system of D naught can be identified with the projective space of all global sections of L naught. So this is a vector space of global sections.  So this shows that linear systems or complete linear systems are more or less the same as taking all sections of a line bundle, except that it is dimension one less because the linear system is really just a projective space of the corresponding line bundle. So let's look at some examples of this. First of all, let's take X to be P1. And let's take the divisor D naught to be n times the point of infinity. Then we want the linear, then the corresponding line bundle L naught is isomorphic to O of n. And the sections just correspond to polynomials a n X to the n plus plus a naught of degree less than or equal to n. And the zeros of this polynomial, which corresponds to linear system. So the linear system is just all effective divisors of degree n, which just means collections of n points. The points are allowed to be the same. You kind of points with are allowed to have multiplicities. And so that's a particularly simple example. You can do the same thing for X being P to the n. Again, we can take the divisor to be n m times the points at infinity. Again, this will correspond to the line bundle O will be isomorphic to O of n. And the sections correspond to homogeneous polynomials of degree n. And the linear system corresponds to all sort of corresponds roughly to all hypersurfaces of degree n. So a degree m, I guess, except that's not quite correct because you allow sort of degenerate hypersurfaces. They're allowed to be reducible and they're allowed to have components with multiplicities bigger than one and so on. So saying they're all hypersurfaces should be taken with a with a small grain of salt. Next, we can have the complete linear system of divisors corresponds to all sections of the corresponding line bundle. More generally, we can have incomplete linear system, which might correspond to some subspace of sections. So here they the element of a linear system corresponds to the zeros of a section. So here we're just looking at the zeros of some subspace of sections. For example, let's take X to be the two dimensional projective plane. And let's take D naught to be the line at infinity. Now here the global sections of the corresponding sheaf will just be rational functions with at most a pole of order one at infinity. They're allowed to have a pole on D naught. So it's spanned by one X and Y. Here we're taking coordinates X, Y, Z for the projective plane. And if you can find them to the obvious affine plane in P squared, that the global sections of this line bundle are just all linear functions. Now, if you take the complete linear system correspond to this, you just get all lines in P2. So let's take the subspace just spanned by X and Y. So this is going to be an incomplete linear system. So this will be all linear functions of form AX plus BY and the zeros of AX plus BY just look like this. So they're just going to be all lines through the origin. So this is an incomplete linear system. So a typical line might be Y minus 2X. So this would be some section of the space. And this would correspond to this line here of the linear system Y equals 2X. And what you notice is that this linear system has a base point. So a base point is a point in all divisors of the linear system. Well, a base point just corresponds to a common zero of all sections in the subspace you've chosen. Now, you remember that if we had a collection of sections of a line bundle, it gave rise to a map to a projective space. And this map was well-defined on the whole of the variety if and only if the sections generate the line bundle. So you can see that the sections generate the line bundle just means that for each point, there's some non-zero section of the line bundle. So sections generating the line bundle is equivalent to saying there are no base points. So if we're working with line bundles, we say we get that the map to projective space is well-defined everywhere, provide the sections, generate the line bundle. If you translate this into a language of linear systems, it just means the linear system has no base points. So there's no base point that's a zero of all the divisors or equivalent that's a zero of all the sections you've got there. So in this particular case, we get a map from P2 to P1, except it's not actually defined everywhere. So here we get a map from P2 to P1, and it just takes the point x, y, z to the point x, y, and you see it's not defined at the base point, which is 001. And so in general, if you've got a linear system of divisors, you get a morphism from some open set of your space x to projective space, where the projective space is actually the dual of the projective space of the linear system. So far, we've just been looking at linear systems on projective space, which are particularly easy because projective space has vanishing Picard groups. So let's look at an example with, sorry, not non-vanishing Picard group, vanishing Picard variety. So let's look at an example with a non-vanishing Picard variety. And here I'm going to take x to be an elliptic curve. And as usual, we're going to cheat a bit by doing it over the complex numbers so that we can use analysis and elliptic functions to see what's going on. And we're going to look at some linear systems of divisors over the elliptic curve. So there are two ways to think of the elliptic curve. You can either think of it as being C modulo lattice, which is a sort of analytic way of doing it, or you can write it as a curve y squared equals 4x cubed minus g2, g2x minus g3. And the connection is that x and y correspond to elliptic functions. So you remember there's an elliptic function p of z, and we have its derivative p dash of z. And y is equal to the derivative of the elliptic function, and x is equal to the elliptic function p of z. So this just becomes the usual differential equation for the viastric elliptic function. I can just write it out explicitly just to make it clear what's going on. So that is equal to p of z cubed minus g2 p of z minus g3. So now let's look at a few divisors. First of all, let's take d0 to be a point, one times the point zero. So if I draw the lattice for the elliptic curve, so here's some lattice contained in the complex numbers. Here's the point zero. And I'm just taking my divisors to consist of a single point here at zero. Then we can ask what are the sections of the corresponding line bundle? Well, the sections of l0 just consist correspond to elliptic functions with at most a single pole at nought. And the only elliptic function of this property is constants. So the sections of the corresponding line bundle just correspond to the constant elliptic function. So the linear system of this is just d0. So the linear system is nought dimensional and just consist of a single point. So for the projective line, if we had a single point, we can sort of move it round on the line and get a linear system of dimension one. For elliptic curve, we can't move a point round. It's not linearly equivalent to the point somewhere else. So the linear system just consists of a single point. And we notice that it has a base point consisting of this point nought because obviously if the linear system just consists of the point nought, then nought is a point of all the divisors of the linear system rather trivially. So now what happens if we take a divisor to consist of two copies of this point zero? We're going to take d nought to be two copies of nought. Well, now we get more functions in the corresponding line bundle because we can get the function one and we can also get the vice tricelliptic function which has at most a double pole here. So we get all functions of the form a plus b times p of z. And now we can ask what are the corresponding divisors corresponding to this? Well, the divisors consist of a point plus minus the point. So if you've got an elliptic curve here, a typical divisor on this linear system will consist of a point here and minus the point or we might get another pair of points of the linear system. We might have a point over here and a point over here and so on. So what do these look like in the algebraic curve? y squared equals 4x cubed minus g2x minus g3. So the elliptic curve might look something like this. Well, what they consist of is pairs of points with the same x coordinate and they have the same value of p and the same value of one. The pair of blue points might correspond to a pair of blue points there and the pair of red points might correspond to a pair of red points somewhere else and so on. So they just have the same coordinate. You notice by the way there are three double points in this linear system. So there's one double point here. Let me use a color that's different from red. There's a double point here and there's a double point here and a double point here and a double point here. So at each half lattice point there's actually a double point and these correspond to these three points on the elliptic curve because that's where the vertical line intersects the elliptic curve in a double point. So now let's see what happens if we take d to be three times the point zero. So this time the linear system is going to consist of point z1, z2, z3 such that z1 plus z2 plus z3 equals zero. So we're working inside c modulo of a lattice L. So what does this look like for the elliptic curve? Well, let's think about what we're doing. The corresponding space of sections of line bundlers, three dimensions spanned by one p and the derivative of p. So we're working at points with a plus b times p plus c times p prime equals zero. So z1, z2 and z3 are going to be the zeros of this function. So this vanishes at z1, z2 and z3. Well, this just says a plus bx plus cy equals zero. So the linear system just consists of triples of points lying on a straight line. So here's a straight line and this would be, this might be z1, z2 and z3. And any other line, you can draw any other straight line like this one here. And again, these three points will be an element of the linear system. So in this case, the linear system consists of triples of co-linear points on the elliptic curve. You can also ask what happens if instead of asking for z1 plus z2 equals z3 equals 0, we ask for z1 plus z2 plus z3 equals something else. So now let's take d0 to be, say, 0 plus some point z. Now the linear system will consist of point z1, z2, z1 plus z2 plus equals z, or z1 plus z2 plus minus z equals 0. Again, this is in c modulo l. So what does this look like on the elliptic curve? Well, if we draw the elliptic curve and if we pick a point, if we pick some fixed point here, then the linear system is just going to consist of pairs of points on the line through this. So this pair of points will be on the linear system, or this pair of points will also be on the linear system. So the linear system is going to be pairs of points, say RS such that RS and T are collinear for some fixed point T. So what this shows is that the elliptic curve has continuous families of linear systems. So for projective line, we only got a discrete set of linear systems. So the linear system was determined by the degree of the points in it. But for elliptic curves, we've got a continuous family of different linear systems because the point z varies continuously. Okay, that's all I want to say about linear systems. So next lecture, we'll be looking at a very general construction which generalizes both the construction of projective space and blowing up points.


I got just the thing for you. So I was in Walmart one day and I was looking for some hair care products and shampoos conditioners, things like that and I stumbled across these products that are like on the bottom shelf. But I was looking for something but I noticed there was these products that kind of stood out. I guess I never seen them before and what really stood out the most was the price. The price was very inexpensive. So I picked them up and I looked at them and I was looking at the ingredients because that's usually the first thing that I look at are the ingredients and I noticed that it said sulfate free which is the very first thing I saw and that's what really mattered to me because I'm trying to get away from all products, hair washing products, shampoos and conditioners that have sulfates, parabens and dyes and things that are like that. Sometimes you can't get away from all of it but as long as it doesn't have sulfate in it or the sulfate is very low, that's fine with me. So I saw this product and I was like wow, like let me check this out. So I know there's a lot of products out there, costly products out there and there's a lot of YouTube videos of all these different expensive shampoos, conditioners, leave and conditioners and just different things but sometimes you just don't have that money to get that at that particular time but you need something that's going to do the job and do it well and you need to get that product right away. Well I'm going to share with you some of the products that I picked up from Walmart and hopefully you can add this to your hair washing regimen. Whenever you just need to grab something quick, you know when you're on that budget or whatever you may be able to strap for cash but you need something that's going to do the job. So let me share with you this product. So the name of the company or the name of the brand is called Daily Defense and it's a Walmart brand. Now you can get it on Amazon, I have seen it on Amazon but I think you can mostly get it in Walmart as far as in store like a retailer but you can get it at Walmart mostly and I have seen Amazon, I've seen Jet.com, I think Ulta may even have it as well so I got mine at Walmart because that's the first place I saw it and you know it's easy access Walmart is not far from my house. The first one I want to show y'all is the shampoo now this one is the this is what the bottle looks like it's Daily Defense and this is a 16 ounce bottle this is the Enriched with Keratin Moisturizing Shampoo this is a 16 ounce guess how much this bottle was you'll never guess 98 cents for this bottle 98 cents where can you get a bottle of 16 ounce shampoo for 98 cents I can't think of any. If you notice on this one it says low sulfate and that's okay it's low or if it's you know not in there all that's okay so I mean of course this is not a hundred percent natural because you know it's so cheap but they are taking the most harsh things out of this product which is the sulfate for the most part. This does come in a bigger bottle it comes in a 32 ounce I don't I didn't get the 32 ounce bottle I got the 16 ounce but this is the keratin shampoo moisturizing shampoo I did get the conditioner that came with it so this is the bigger bottle conditioner and this one is the 32 ounce now if you'll notice this one says no sulfates on this one and it's color-safe so if your hair is colored you know it's definitely safe on color okay now this one is the shea butter an almond oil one again this is the 32 ounce bottle and it is color-safe as well if your hair is colored oh and I forgot to tell you all the price the price of the conditioners are $1.77 $1.77 for these 32 ounce conditioner I don't know where I can get a big thing of conditioner that doesn't have any sulfates in it for $1.77 this does last a long time and it goes a long way so it doesn't take a lot it smells really good too and I did not know they had deep conditioners I just found out about it yesterday when I was in Walmart again and I happened to swash I was in a different Walmart and I noticed that they had deep conditioners in the little tubes like the little tubs like this one now this one is a five ounce tub oh yeah tub and this one is the argon oil guess how much this one was I'm letting y'all guess this one was 98 cents five ounce 98 cents you cannot beat that this is the bigger bottle of the deep conditioner and this is the 10 ounce tub and this is the coconut oil and vitamin E and this one was a dollar I think it's like a dollar 70 something maybe like a dollar 90 something now both of these are three minute deep conditioner so kind of like the Aussie deep conditioner it's like three minutes and this particular one is for frizzy hair so if you have frizzy hair you will want to get this one which is the coconut oil and vitamin E because this one is for frizzy hair this one is for damaged hair so if you have damaged hair this three-minute deep conditioner is right for you I wanted to share that with y'all because that like I said sometimes we get into the habit of spending so much money on hair care products and shampoos and conditioners when we have easy access to things that are more affordable for us we can finish our budget that goes a long way so this is a money saver for me so instead of me running out and buying three four five it up dollars worth of you know shampoos and things like that I mean which can work and can go a long way but if I can get 32 ounce bottle of conditioner and I go through conditioner I do conditioners more than I do shampoo if I get a 32 ounce bottle of conditioner for $1.77 over like I see or what's the old one I see and herbal essence I know they sell theirs in a big tub and but it's like I think a 32 ounce with theirs is like five six dollars but it has sulfates in it I wanted to share that with y'all like I said hair care products on a budget they are out there and they are affordable and they are at your disposal please check it out it's your local Walmart this is the daily defense and I'll show you again I haven't seen any leave-in conditioners yet so I need to check like the full line just to see what all else they got but this is what I've seen so far of their line so if you like this video please give a thumbs up please comment and click that subscribe button it's just Janine bye


The response to COVID-19 by the United States government has been largely laughable, and I think that every other country around the world, citizens in other countries, are looking at us and just laughing at us rightfully so because we are a bunch of morons, right? Currently what's happening is you have a lot of states reopening their economies, sending everyone back to work when COVID cases are spiking. So the new strategy apparently is just to pretend like it's not a thing. If you pretend as if COVID-19 doesn't exist, then apparently it'll go away, except it doesn't work like that. I wish.  So that's where we're at. We've all laid out our priorities and the winners in this debate ultimately will be the capitalists who think that we should sacrifice ourselves, risk our own asses to reopen the economy because that's just more important than people dying and getting sick due to COVID-19 having long term damage to their health due to COVID-19 if they catch it. But in spite of all of that, not to be a doomer, because I feel like I've been a doomer a lot lately, there is some good news with regard to COVID-19. We may have a breakthrough when it comes to COVID-19 treatment because a drug known as dexamethasone, which is a steroid, has been successful in saving the lives of many patients with COVID-19. And the better part about the story is that it's actually a relatively cheap solution and it's widely available. And on top of that, you know, as this pandemic continues, we are going to learn more about what works and what doesn't work. And currently, for some reason, there is a nationwide debate about the efficacy of masks, right, which that really shouldn't be a debate. But again, I blame government for that for not actually being clear about whether or not we should wear masks.  I can't let you in the store without a mask. OK, so where's the regulations that state that? The regulations? Yeah. Because you're discriminating against me now. Do you know that? Put your hands on me. Well, you got to wear a mask, bro. I don't even know what it is, bro. I'm just going to show my 3,000 follower Instagram feed, mostly locals. Hi, everyone. I work for Costco and I'm asking this member to put on a mask because that is our company policy. So either wear the mask. And I'm not doing it because I woke up in a free country. Like, that's all I want to do is cry because you can't see people's faces. You can't make human connection. Absolutely insane. So we don't even have a choice anymore. So they're literally calling the police on me because I am not putting this mask on. It's unhealthy for me. I don't want to breathe my own CO2. So nobody wants to wear masks. But a lot of us are because if we wear masks, then that stops us from spreading germs to other people if we have COVID, but we don't know for asymptomatic, right? So it's not to protect yourself, right? You're not wearing a mask for self-interested reasons.  So it's incredibly, you know, I think inappropriate to not want to wear a mask in public because I don't know where you've been. I don't know how careless you've been acting. So wear a mask, be polite, except that's not really what we've seen. Regardless, I've got bad news for the Karens because apparently wearing a mask actually is very effective at stopping the spread of COVID-19. Who would have thought? So according to Faith Karimi of CNN, no cases of coronavirus have been linked to two Missouri hairstylists who saw 140 clients last month while symptomatic, county health officials said. Both stylists worked at the same great clips location in Springfield. The clients and the stylists all wore face coverings and the salon had set up other measures such as social distancing of chairs and staggered appointments. The Springfield Green County Health Department said this week of the 140 clients and seven coworkers potentially exposed, 46 took tests that came back negative. All the others were quarantined for the duration of the coronavirus incubation period. The 14 day incubation period has now passed with no coronavirus cases linked to the salon beyond the two stylists, county health officials said. During the quarantine, those who did not get tested got a call twice a day from health officials asking whether they had symptoms related to COVID-19, said Catherine Wall, a spokeswoman for the Springfield Green County Health Department. This is exciting news about the value of masking to prevent COVID-19, said Clay Goddard, the county's director of health. We are studying more closely the details of these exposures. Including what types of face coverings were worn and what other precautions were taken to lead to this encouraging result. So this tells you that wearing a mask is really important. It works. Now, here's the thing about masks. It only works if everyone wears a mask. So if you go to a storm and not 100% of the people there are wearing masks, well, it's not going to be as effective. And sure, this doesn't necessarily mean that wearing a mask will save us and stop the spread of COVID-19, definitely, because this is just one anecdote. But it tells us that if you do want to reduce the spread of COVID-19, then if we all wear masks, then we're going to be better off.  And all of a sudden, it's this debate. And if you watched Joe Rogan, I think he said something a couple of weeks ago that it's not masculine to wear a mask or whatever. I mean, why are we having this conversation?  Can we just wear a mask for a couple of months?   It's not going to go away, you know, if we just wish it away or pray enough.  It's a pandemic and a pandemic has a very specific key set of things we can take precautions we can use to make sure we minimize its spread.  I mean, this is incredibly frustrating to me because you have a lot of people who are doing everything in their power to social distance, to stay home, to wear masks.   We're only as strong as our weakest links. But I mean, this is America. So everything is a political issue. Everything becomes a partisan issue, right? At the beginning of this pandemic, everyone was all in agreement that this is a real thing, first of all, which is important to establish.  These are all things that we have to do to stop COVID-19. And now, you know, just give us a couple of months and we absolutely take this issue and turn it into a partisan issue to where if you are wearing a mask to the grocery store, you're making some sort of political statement.   It's a pandemic. So I mean, I don't know what else to say. If you don't wear a mask, you are risking everyone else. It's not like you are saying, well, I'm just going to take chances and not wear a mask. No, it's it doesn't work that way. By not wearing a mask, you are potentially endangering other people.  So it's not going to be a 100 percent guarantee. You know, you're not going to definitely stop the spread of COVID-19 if you wear a mask, but will it reduce the spread of COVID-19? Yes. And I think that that's common sense. We shouldn't necessarily need studies like this to tell us that. Nonetheless, here we are. So we're talking about it. Wear a mask, stop complaining. It's not that big of a deal. We don't like wearing masks.  Jesus, people put on a mask. And I'm not doing it because I woke up in a free country. It's unhealthy for me. I don't want to breathe my own CO2.


Free solo climber Alex Honnold has accomplished some of the most amazing feats of climbing ever done on earth, including ascending the 3000 foot El Capitan in Yosemite National Park without a harness or rope of any kind. That's taller than two Empire State buildings stacked on top of each other. In order to achieve something so incredibly dangerous, where a single mistake is instant death, Honnold stakes his life on preparation. He does numerous run-throughs with ropes so he knows exactly where every single step will be, which gives him the confidence on climb day. He's always insisted that he feels fear. He just prepares to the point that he knows who'll be able to accomplish his goal by mentally rehearsing everything that could happen. The preparation is what keeps him at ease. Fear never totally disappears, but each practice run is like a rock hammer chipping away at stone. There is no adrenaline rush. He once told 60 minutes about his climbs. If I get a rush, it means something has gone horribly wrong.