What's up everybody welcome to the fan to a hurry up and normally on Tuesdays you get Greg Sussman and JJ Zachary's and doing the buyer Sell segment we're still doing the buyer sell segment, but I am not Greg Sussman I'm Frank Stanford joined by Jim Sonnis of number fire Jim. How's everything going? It's good not quite as good as me is for Greg congrats to Greg on Everything is this past weekend for him So not quite flying as high as Greg Sussman, but I am okay and happy to be talking with you here today Frank How are you? I'm doing very well Jim How can I not after the Jets pull off that great victory against the New York Giants? Let's jump into these buyer sells for season-long fantasy football and Jim your first buy is DJ Chark do do do do do do who is arguably the biggest steal of the fantasy football draft season And you might argue that he can be an even bigger steal moving forward. Why is that? Yeah, I think that with Nick foals becoming the quarterback for the Jaguars It's kind of only upside because the odds that Nick foals is a worse quarterback than Gardner Minshew I don't think are all that high he could be the exact same as Gardner Minshew in which case DJ Chark winds up being a very good fantasy football asset down the stretch or We could see a situation which Nick foals winds up being an upgrade from Gardner Minshew That does happen. It's going to upgrade everybody in this offense I think most people are going to gravitate towards DD Westbrook because we have this narrative in mind that Nick Foals likes to throw to slot guys that could be true and based on what happened in the previous season It may wind up being true But at that time DJ Chark hadn't really emerged yet for the Jaguars while Nick foals is out He did do that and he's going to be involved in this team going forward So if we get a potential quarterback upgrade for a guy who gets the number of high leverage targets that DJ Chark gets and is as good on those targets as DJ Chark has been it could lead to a lot of upsides So I think you can you know really pitch buying any of these Jaguars players whether it be DD Westbrook DJ Chark Leonard Fournet all these guys would benefit if Nick foals were to be an upgrade from Gardner Minshew But I think the guy most intrigued in the guy is going to get the most high leverage looks is DJ Chark And I think it makes sense to take a little bit of a risk here See what happens Nick foals again It's within the range of outcomes. He could be a downgrade from Gardner Minshew, but I don't think that's all that likely I'm going to play the percentages here and go with DJ Chark and try to get those deep balls from a Quarterback who has been good at times in the past So I think this could be a good time to buy in a DJ Chark But just more broadly this entire entire Jaguars team is pretty interesting right now DJ Chark currently the wide receiver 14 and fantasy points per game And Jim thinks that there's a good chance that Nick foals is an upgrade over Gardner Minshew So Jim is buying DJ Chark and the rest of the Jaguars Damien Williams was one of the higher drafted running backs this year in fantasy football Jim and he hasn't lived up to expectations until just recently back-to-back games with over 70% of the snaps The Shawn McCoy was inactive this past week. You are buying Damien Williams Yeah, I think that Andy Reid kind of gave you an out to buy Damien Williams here Which is really encouraging for me because I do want to buy him broadly But I think Andy Reid may have made it a lot easier because his justification for making the show McCoy inactive was load management But if you look at the position the chiefs are in they can't really afford to load manage guys They truly value because they were six and three going on the road in a spot where they were a very slight favorite If you are trying to win that game, which they should be to try to get the two seed in the ASC They're not gonna sit a guy. They actually value all that much So it probably was Andy Reid sticking up for one of his guys You know Lashaw McCoy and he go way back But if people buy into that and think that we're gonna see Lashaw McCoy pop back up here pretty soon It's going to allow you to get Damien Williams and lower than what his cost currently is We also saw Damien Williams play 70% of the snaps back in week nine He did the exact same in week 10 and he had 19 carries and five targets And if you can get 19 carries and five targets tied to Patrick Mahomes I'm gonna take that every time Additionally their left tackle Eric Fisher may be back here pretty soon So the rushing efficiency could go up for Damien Williams and he did lose a fumble in that game against Tennessee And he was returned for a touchdown, but on that very next drive Damien Williams was back out there So it doesn't seem like he's gonna be as punished as Lashaw McCoy has been for fumbling issues I think that this is Damien Williams backfield right now in Kansas City If they get Eric Fisher back it could lead to good things They're facing the Chargers is upcoming week in Mexico City That's a spot where the rush offense could do well Then they have a buy and it's annoying to deal with a buy and try to buy a player who still has his buy left But I think that when the upsides are you could get the number one running back in this cheese backfield I'm still gonna try to do it So there is some risk around Damien Williams given that maybe Andy Reid was telling the truth And they were just trying to manage Lashaw McCoy's reps that could lead to some fragility with Damien Williams But the upside here is so big that I'm gonna buy here and hope that Andy Reid was just blowing smoke to try to protect Lashaw McCoy Jim's right that it's frustrating to buy a player that still has a buy week left in season-long fantasy football But the upside is massive here for Damien Williams again He was a top two round draft pick this year and it's finally getting the workload with Patrick Mahomes back with Tyreek Hill back So I'm with Jim. We're buying Damien Williams The last player that we're looking to buy here is Nick Chubb and heading into this past week Jim Everybody was freaking out about what the workload was going to be for Nick Chubb and Karim Hunt and frankly I think that this was the best-case scenario for both of these players. Let's say you I would say literally the exact same thing It is the best-case scenario here as far as what we could have expected now Honestly like my based on expectation for Nick Chubb would be that his snap I would say about setting he had played about 60% of the snaps each of the previous two games And I kind of thought that we'd see Karim Hunt jump in and Chubb would still be around 60% Instead he played 80% of the snaps on Sunday and part of that may have been because it was a tight game They were a neutral game script the entire time But that was also true before Karim Hunt got there and they had these two guys on the field a lot And it was pretty effective for this Browns offense So I would expect them to continue to roll out these two running back sets and ride these two guys and Nick Chubb's workload There was really good. He had 20 carries. He had four targets Those are both really good numbers and he ran 27 routes compared to 23 for Karim Hunt I think that based on the way people have talked about Nick Chubb It says if they are freaking out with Karim Hunt with Karim Hunt being really involved I think people are going to overreact to hunt's involvement and sell Nick Chubb And I think that if they are inclined to do that We should try to get Nick Chubb onto our roster because like you said it was the best case scenario It was effective and their schedule after the Steelers game really does open up quite a bit So yeah, it's a tough match of Thursday But after that the Browns get some really soft matchups where they should be able to run the ball a lot And that puts well for both guys Karim Hunt and Nick Chubb I prefer Chubb here obviously and I think that it really wound up being almost better than I possibly could have expected So people are still worried about about Karim Hunt taking away from Nick Chubb I think that it could wind up taking away some carries But it's not nearly as bad as I thought it could have been and this team is still going to lean on these two guys So I think it's really a good time to go out there Send out some feelers for Nick Chubb and see if you can get him onto your rosters for below market value Again, if you can find a Nick Chubb owner that is freaking out right now about Karim Hunt and his Increasing role moving forward then you should be trying to pounce on that and buy Nick Chubb 24 running back opportunities 80% of the snaps it does not get much better than that for Nick Chubb Let's move over to the cell candidates here in fantasy football and Jim you have Aaron Jones as a cell Currently the RB3 overall 14 total touchdown this season Jim does touchdown regression actually exist Well, it exists, but that's not the main reason that I want to sell Aaron Jones The main reason I want to sell Aaron Jones is because he's going to be very good down the stretch But if you can sell him as being a top three back in fantasy, you're going to get a lot in return I think that's pretty attractive and now you may not get exactly that But if you don't get a good return from Aaron Jones, then don't sell him But I think that based on the numbers he has put up based on the fact this Green Bay offense is playing as well As they are you should get a really good haul for this guy Maybe you can get a guy who has already had his buy Whereas Aaron Jones is heading into his buy this week Aaron Jones 13 carries no targets in that game Against the Panthers on Sunday, and he had a 50% snap rate alongside Jamal Williams Those numbers are discouraging and we've seen Jones or Aaron Jones get only four targets in two games Since Devonte Adams came back Devonte Adams is going to command targets in this offense And Aaron Jones had at least four targets in five straight games before Devonte Adams came back So I think that Devonte Adams being back in the fold here does hurt Aaron Jones because a lot of his value came From the work he got in the passing game. So that's a downgrade for our Jones We know Jamal Williams will still mix in there and it's smart Green Bay wants to conserve these guys and Jamal Williams Has been good this year. You can't fault them for riding more with Jamal Williams this year than they have in the past I think that makes a lot of sense to keep Aaron Jones healthy But it doesn't necessarily bode well for fantasy I think that because Aaron Jones just scored three touchdowns in that 95 rushing yards It's a good time to sell him right now Just make sure you're not selling him for too low because he is a very valuable fantasy football commodity going forward And if you can't get fair value for him, then just keep him. That's totally okay But I think given how good he has been you should get a pretty good haul If you can get a good haul, you know get a top-end wide receiver Maybe get some depth that you're running back position as well That's gonna bode well for you down the stretch and I think that that is something I would want to at least explore So I'm not saying you have to sell Aaron Jones I'm saying you see what you can get in return and if it's a really good haul I would say pull that trigger because the workload here is just kind of okay The efficiency is going to be awesome behind this offensive line and he's a good player and a great offense We want all those things But if you can get some kind of phenomenal return for this guy I would say pull that trigger because the best days for Aaron Jones may not necessarily be ahead You don't have to sell Aaron Jones, but Jim is saying explore the option You know if you can sell high on Aaron Jones and get a phenomenal return Then that's something that you should look into again He's the RB three and fantasy points per game He has 14 total touchdowns He just played 50% of the snaps and split the workload evenly with Jamal Williams So this could be a frustrating situation moving forward Let's move on over to the Baltimore Ravens in offense that runs literally through Lamar Jackson, which has you Selling Mark Ingram Jim. Why is that? Yeah? I kind of hate his role. I hate a lot of things that mark Ingram's role right now It's been pretty unappealing for a decently long stretch now He played 49% of the snaps this past week and you could say well Hey, they obliterated the Bengals and did not need mark Ingram in that game That is probably a fair assessment and it could explain why mark Ingram's snap rate was so low But his snap rate is now been low. It's been 52% or lower in forestry of games He has not had more than 15 carries in any of those games He has not had more than three targets in any of those games Basically what we're seeing is mark Ingram is losing work to guys like us Edwards and Justice Hill and as their workload gets bigger Mark Ingram's will get smaller. He is going to face Houston. He's gonna face the Rams in San Francisco The next three games. None of those are slam dunk matchups They're not matches where you need to benchmark Ingram, but they're not necessarily the best matchup So I think it's a situation where you take a similar approach to Aaron Jones where you go out there And see what people will give you from our king group I would be willing to sell mark Ingram for much less than I'd be willing to sell Aaron Jones Just because I don't think the upside for targets is there as it is with Aaron Jones And I'm also just not as sure that he's going to get the high leverage work that they may give to guys like Gus Edwards, so I think it's a good time to float out mark Ingram He did score on Sunday, which can kind of alleviate some concerns there But I'm not sure he has the same path to a big day as he did earlier this year given that dip and snap rate and the increased Rule for Gus Edwards And I would like to cut bait as as quickly as humanly possible because the bottom could fall out of mark Ingram You're pretty soon. He'll be efficient He's gonna have a high yards per carry and this offense will score touchdowns But I just think the role is not good enough to justify not seeing what you get in return for him right now Since week six marking was playing just 45% of the snaps and averaging 13 and a half touches per game It doesn't have a huge role in the past game either So if you can get a high-end RB 2 or a high-end wide receiver 2 in return for Mark Ingram That's definitely something you should be looking into Let's move on over to AJ Brown of the Tennessee Titans and Jim We saw this past week a huge spike in snaps with Corey Davis out But unfortunately AJ Brown did not make the most of this opportunity. Let's be honest the Tennessee Titans want to run run run With Derek Henry. That's exactly what they've done all season. Why are you selling AJ Brown? Yeah, it's worth noting you're not gonna get a whole lot in return for AJ Brown based on what he did on Sunday I think that's totally okay I don't need a whole lot in return to move this guy because I don't see a situation Which I'm going to want to use AJ Brown for the rest of this year because think back to Sunday Not only was it a script where they potentially could have had to throw a lot against Kansas City But it was also with no Corey Davis and no Delaney Walker and AJ Brown still had just four targets and caught only one That was the best situation AJ Brown is going to have this entire year and he still could not capitalize But I think that when you talk about guys like Corey Davis and like AJ Brown people always want to buy in Because they're very talented players and I do not disagree AJ Brown is a talented football player The problem is that he's in a scheme that's going to spread things out And they're going to run like you said as often as they can that is not what you want for a fantasy wide receiver From a real-world perspective I would take AJ Brown on my team every day because he is very good But there are one first team that spreads the ball around and after their bi-week They could get Corey Davis and Delaney Walker back that's going to make the situation much worse So AJ Brown very well could have good days down the end of the year But I know I'm not going to be able to predict those good days And I just want no part of it if I have to guess when he's going to have a spike week as opposed to a one catch for 17 yard week and I think that that is the big reason why I want to get rid of AJ Brown again You're not going to get a whole lot in return here But I think that is okay because I don't see myself ever using this guy down the stretch given how Predictable his spike weeks are going to be he's never gonna have a better situation than what he had on Sunday With those guys coming back So I think you're probably not going to get a whole lot But I float AJ Brown out there and see if you can potentially package him with someone else to get a bigger fish because it's just a grim situation And I really want no part of this Tennessee passing offense AJ Brown very talented Derek Henry also very talented This is a run first football team Mike variable wants to play defense and run the ball They spread the ball around too much So there's just not going to be enough value for AJ Brown and the Corey Davis of the world So if you can get anything in return for AJ Brown, it's something that you should look into For Jim Sonnis, I am Frank Staple. Thank you so much for watching and good luck heading into week 11 of your fantasy football season


In 1932, gold prospectors searching within the San Pedro Mountains of Wyoming would make a groundbreaking discovery, a find which, for a brief period of time, exposed to the world the past existence of a group of people, a secret unexplainable race which has been successfully covered up for over a century. Cast into the realm of folklore, this group of people could be attributed to tales of gnomes or hobbits. The once-native crow people spoke of their ferocious nature for many hundreds of years. No taller than 36 inches in height, according to William R. Corlis in his 1978 book, Ancient Man, a Handbook of Puzzling Artifacts, citing the Anthropological Institute, Journal 6-118-76. An ancient little people graveyard of vast proportions was once found in Coffey County. It was estimated that there were as many as 100,000 separate individuals buried there, and in 1932, two gold prospectors would thankfully expose the existence of the little people of Priory Mountain to the world. Deep within a mine on the mountain, they discovered a secret lair, a tomb, somehow placed deep within the rock face. In this tomb, they found the mummified remains of a tiny humanoid. Now known as Pedro, according to Dr. Henry Shapiro, an anthropologist from the American Museum of Natural History, along with the several x-rays he made, proving his authenticity, Pedro was 65 years old when he died, and he had unfortunately suffered a terrible fall which had dislocated several of the vertebrae in his back. It seemed to Dr. Shapiro, a head wound that he had apparently suffered some short time after may have been the result of his relinquished life, in a curious act of mercy by his fellow tribe members. The Crote Tribe attest to these tiny people once being gifted warriors, feared by all those in the surrounding areas. They told of the little people murdering all who ventured near them, even decimating a group of 200 strong warriors who mistakenly trespassed into their territories during the night. Pedro ended up in a pharmacy in Wyoming, and for seven years he was a successful local attraction. One day, when an unusual businessman offered to buy him, after apparently paying a very large sum, the man disappeared with Pedro, and he has never been seen of again. The only existing mummy of the little people, it seems, was successfully confiscated during the late 1950s. To this day, it is not known where Pedro is, although for the person who locates his current residence, we have been made aware of a substantial cash prize for the person who can bring him back into the public arena, or at least enable further testing. If you know where Pedro is, please do get in touch. There is someone with a rather large present waiting for you. In our most recent video, we covered the astonishing still existing unexplainable fortification designs and other inexplicable architectural features which can still be found within nearly every district of modern-day Italy. We covered polygonal walls, multi-ton lentils still bridging ancient archways, resulting in the conclusion that much of modern-day Italy rests upon a pre-Diluvian foundation, known relics from an era within history that has been hidden from the majority of the world for several centuries. However, thanks to modern technology and the power of communication in which it has provided, photographic studies, past investigators' research available, and a resulting far-reaching exposure of this overwhelming evidence across the globe all at the click of a button. The evidence we continue to share not only contradicts modern academic theories regarding the origins of such structures, but thanks to the ability to collect and compile this information digitally through the medium of computers, certain individuals with an acute sensory ability have not only been able to share volumes of noticed anomalies that for many years were overlooked, but have linked these factors together through characteristics, and as such have come to a conclusion that the evidence to suggest a past highly capable civilization once flourished here on our planet is now overwhelming. A civilization that at some point within antiquity possibly came to an untimely demise due to cataclysm or transcended to a location or indeed realm we are yet to discover. Once creating incredible polygonal structures, not only built with no mortar, but were capable of withstanding considerable onslaught, either from invading parties or natural disaster, a testament to this being that many still stand as proud today as when they were first built. A civilization that throughout our last few videos, initially aided by other compassionate good-intentioned antiquarians, have been linking thanks to their decision to construct such monuments with unique stylized block designs, possibly cast using as yet undiscovered advanced ancient technology, or indeed carved with as yet undiscovered precision stone cutting tools which we have used to begin to identify this now lost civilization's work, ancient as yet unexplained ruins the world over. With this compelling complement of evidential factors supportive of our postulation of a past worldwide dominance. And although we personally hypothesize that the only logical culprit which matches our continued discoveries of their dominant existence and indeed advanced nature being that of the Atlanteans, this premise at this moment in time is not the most pressing factor regarding our research. And at this moment in time, it is vital that we continue to compile a solid thesis which will eventually, inevitably, make any academics claim as to a denial of their past existence inexcusable. Ancient stone relics, found in nearly every country on nearly every continent on earth, with our next area of focus being that of the gigantic Cyclopean ruin which can be found within modern-day Bosnia. Even as De Orson, these ruins are not only a virtual match to ancient ruins we recently covered within Italy, but also as a number of alternative researchers have concluded, such as modern investigator Richard Casero, Giuseppe Lugely, a past pioneering documenter of these sites, and indeed ourselves, are in fact some of the oldest foundations to be found on earth. Seemingly predating the more complex polygonal techniques witnessed elsewhere, although still possessing precision placement, it is of more uniformly shaped blocks. Predictably, however, academia has been forced due to currently a tested paradigm to attribute these ruins to the Illyrian tribe, a group of people placed at the turn of the bronze to Iron Age. Yet how this primitively equipped group accomplished such feats, quarrying, moving, and placing multi-ton blocks precisely atop one another, is an explanation which is conveniently absent from academia's long and detailed description of the archaeological discoveries which have been permitted, collected, and subsequently displayed. De Orson was discovered in 1891, and not surprisingly, it has never been fully investigated archaeologically. De Orson was once an immense and undoubtedly intimidating stone fortification, which we believe already stood at the site, leading to this group re-inhabiting it rather than building it, undoubtedly giving them a considerable advantage over rival tribes within the area, providing a practically impenetrable barrier, a sanctuary, allowing them to flourish, re-use like so many other ancient unexplained sites we have covered, and put forth the same posit for this being the main reason many of the ancient civilizations we now know well, the Romans, Incas, Egyptians, etc., lasted so long, providing academia with so much archaeological detail, which they have in turn used to claim such structures were the work of these clans. This claim always absent any satisfactory explanatory description as to how these cultures went about constructing such sites. It does, however, give a rather revealing insight into where many of their rapid technological developments arose from, ingenious survival solutions, not invented but rather inspired or more accurately copied from the remnants of the civilizations originally responsible for such builds, developments they would have full access to. The town of Deorsan, we hypothesize, was embraced by this tribe and, as such, now displays many archaeological features of a Hellenistic city. They predictably developed a high degree of culture and civilization. Yet, intriguingly, within the district there also still exists fragments of what were once human statues, all around two meters in height. Yet all permitted archaeological artifacts are conveniently dated from the 2nd and 4th century BC, housed in the National Museum of Bosnia, clearly in an attempt to strengthen a fallacy regarding this astonishing Cyclopean ruins' origins. Who built Deorsan? How did they move such enormous stones, placed with such precision? Why are there remnants of statues of individuals we would perceive in the modern day as giants? It is clearly an intriguing sight, rarely shared academically and not even fully archaeologically explored, a place we find, undoubtedly, highly compelling. Polygonal masonry is undoubtedly a top-Trump argument along with toolmark patterning and indeed pyramidal and other structural forms which can be found across the globe, which prove there was not only once an ocean-going ancient civilization, but a worldwide highly advanced superpower who once dominated the Earth. The proof is there for all to see, yet en masse, how they incorporate these proofs into their critical decision-making faculties is still up for debate. Regardless, this proof of their past capabilities are still on display the world over, a duly awarded testament to their building prowess. Although many have attempted to explain these stones, some claiming they are of artificial or geopolymer origins, others claim they are somehow a reformed rock from a plaster of peristite constituent of the original stone itself. Some even claim a plant was responsible. Any definitive answer as to how these stones were shaped and placed, or indeed any recreation of these claimed methods, elude us to this day. A lost technology from a now lost yet once highly advanced ancient civilization, Cusco, which translates as The City of the Puma, holds some of the most exquisite and best-preserved polygonal masonry to be found anywhere. According to the famous 12-sided stone, something which many are not aware of, however, is that it is also home to dozens of carvings and structures which were intended as artistic masonry renditions of animals, one of which, namely, the Puma. Academic hypothesis suggests that these creations were built by the Inca to once form the boundary walls of an ancient temple, yet like the countless other areas we explore here on our channel, any explanation as to how the walls were constructed, or indeed why pumas and other animals were incorporated into this enigmatic stonework, is absent from all and any academically accepted historical description of their origin. We feel that these structures were built for a reason, even stretching as far as Egypt, present as casing stones on the pyramids of Egypt themselves. They wanted future man to witness this stonework, built to last, and to remain immovable. It is if they were trying to tell us something about their existence, and indeed the true history and perhaps future fate of mankind. We find Cusco's Puma, and indeed the lost knowledge itself, highly compelling. Simir Osmanagic, a Bosnian-American businessman now based in Houston, Texas, has long claimed that a particular and uncannily angled hill, long presumed as a natural formation, is actually the largest human-made ancient pyramid on earth. The claims have predictably been met with hostility by those in the academic world who protect modern paradigm. His work has also been heavily criticized, not only as a hoax, but damaging to the other areas of Bosnia which are authentic and mainstream accepted ruins. However, regardless of these hostilities, Simir has continued his research and promotion of the area as a tourist attraction. Furthermore, what he has since discovered from numerous excavations is curious, clearly artificial, and massive ancient activities now hidden beneath several meters of strata. Not only have these discoveries of ancient masonry corroborated his ancient claim, but there is also evidence to suggest that incredible efforts were made to divert and control the flow of local water systems, channeling them into and beneath the structure. Regardless of these discoveries, mainstream sources continue to dismiss his claims, and indeed further supporting discoveries, continuing to retain a position of complete denial, claiming that, quote, there is no evidence that they were shaped by human construction. The European Association of Archaeologists has condemned the so-called Bosnian pyramids as a cruel hoax, along with various other scholars, end quote. There are others, however, who have looked into the research and indeed Simir's efforts in depth, and from this have come to realize that there is much about this curious hill still to be unraveled, and regardless of the skeptic's unrelenting hostility to said claims, they have discovered something rather extraordinary. According to radiocarbon dating done on an artificially constructed tunnel which penetrates the pyramidal feature, if accepted by mainstream academics, they would also have to be dated at over 32,000 years old. Could this be the reason for such hostilities, in regard to fully exploring the site? The tunnels found in Ravney Park 2 have been carbon dated by the Archaeological Park Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun Foundation. We have ourselves in the past explored the casing stones upon the great pyramids of Giza, these stones clearly of a much younger age than the stone in which they are now preserving. Severe erosion upon these earlier stones, we feel, may also be indicative of a similar age to that found at the Bosnian site. Simir commented on the latest find by stating, quote, according to the results of the examination of stalagmites found in the new tunnels, we discovered an antiquity of 26,200 years old. It means that these entrances and tunnels, which until now have remained hidden from the public, go deep into the past of the region. He continued, when we add the time needed to prepare the base for the creation of stalagmites and corrections for calibrated age to the radiocarbon age, we arrive at about 32,000 years. This is exactly the age of the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun and the underground tunnels of Ravney, and they are all part of the same culture, concluded Osman Aghaj, speaking to Denevni Avaz. These discoveries, along with Simir's earlier work, regardless of the skepticism which predictably surrounds the site, we find highly compelling.


This video will teach you how to determine if a journal article or a journal title is available through the library and what to do if the library doesn't own it. I'll show you how to use the journal list link on the left of the web page, how to search an article title using the articles link above the main catalog search box and how to determine if the library has an article and what to do if it doesn't. Let's start by searching the journal list link to see if the library owns the medical journal JAMA. I'll click on the journal list link on the left hand side and enter the word JAMA into the box. The title appears below in the drop-down box and I can click on it. I can also just hit enter. JAMA is available online through the library. If we click on the title, we can see that this journal is available online from 1998, volume 279, issue one. Click the blue American Medical Association current link to go to the JAMA site. Click the white X on the left side of the screen. Then the blue library on the upper left hand side of the screen to start a new search. Let's say I have a specific article title from JAMA that I need to see if the library has. I'm going to click the articles link above the main search box and enter the title I need for my article. Click the blue search box on the right. We can see that the article is available online in the library's catalog. Click the blue article title. Then click the blue American Medical Association current below the full text availability to go to the article. The article opens in a separate browser window tab. I'm going to choose the first tab again to go back to the library catalog. And then click on the white X on the left side to close the window. Then the blue library up in the upper left hand side of the screen to start a new search. What if you search for an article that the library doesn't have? Let's look at an example of that. I'm going to start a new search. Click the blue search button. No full text article was found. Click the include non full text results box on the left side to see if we have the abstract. The abstract is a short paragraph that describes the article. It helps us to know if it's relevant enough to want to read the full article. The article shows in the results, but the no online access next to the picture of the links tells us that the library does not have this article in full text. You may request this article through inner library loan and the library will borrow it from another library. You will need the permalink or the citation. The librarian will need that information to order the article for you. Use the citation link in the upper right hand side of the result box or the permalink. Click the picture of the quotes or the picture of the links. Scroll down and then click the green copy box. You can now copy this article's information into either an email or a chat box. Click the blue with the librarian box on the right hand side of the screen or send the email to us at the library. Send it to reference at Bellevuecollege.edu. Include the citation or the permalink within the body of your email. This video has taught you how to determine if the library owns a specific journal title or journal article. If you have any questions about the library's catalog or interlibrary loan, contact one of our librarians.


Guys, yes. So I know a lot of people don't like ASMR. That's fine. We've been having a really tough week.  I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but for those of you that don't follow me on Twitter or the podcast or Julian, our hamster had passed away on Friday, which has been really, really sad for us because we loved him so much. It turns out he was just a little older than we thought he was. We must have gotten him as a full adult because the vet said that he died.  We had him for about a year. Their life span's only like two to three, so we're missing a lot and it sucks.  This is the second video we've filmed today. For those of you that would like to do YouTube someday, let me tell you something that doesn't work. Filming, editing, and uploading all the same day is a really bad plan. The first video we made just didn't work, so I'm really, really sorry. But I did wanna make this video anyways because I saw a video of Haru with a Shiba Inu on YouTube, ASMR eating popcorn, and it is one of the most delightful videos I think I've ever watched. So I wanted my dog to get a chance to see ASMR eating popcorn. We actually cooked this popcorn ourselves. I've been slaving over it for hours. I'm kidding, it takes like five seconds. Marvel's is not in this video because I think he's scared of popcorn. I might bring him in and see what he thinks, but he's gonna be scared of the popcorn. We're not gonna let him eat a ton of it. He'll get to just enjoy some.  We'll see you guys next week.


I'm beginning to think that my Emacs configuration file will be a never-ending project. It's going to be a perpetual thing that I work on from now until the end of my life. I will be forever working on my Emacs configuration file. And because I haven't talked about my config file here in recent weeks, it's been probably three or four weeks since the last time I showed you guys an updated version of my Emacs config. I thought today I'd show you some of the additions I've made here recently to my config.org. So let me switch over to the desktop and let me go ahead and launch Emacs. I'm going to go ahead and open my Emacs config and I'm going to zoom in here a little bit. So I've added a couple of new sections to my Emacs config. The first one I want to talk about is this section here that I titled PDFs. I installed this Emacs program called PDF-Tools. What this does, it allows me to actually read PDFs inside Emacs. And you're probably wondering, don't you already have a document viewer, a PDF viewer, most Linux distributions, ship things like events or Zathura. There's a million different PDF viewers available on Linux and pretty much every distribution. Ships went out of the box. So why do you have to read PDFs inside Emacs? Well, if you're already in Emacs, you're already using Dear Ed, the file manager in Emacs. When you click on a PDF, why not just open that PDF inside Emacs? It kind of makes sense when you think about it. So to install this program PDF-Tools, I simply did a use package PDF-Tools. Those of you that followed along with my configuring Emacs series, we've already talked about use package. And it's very simple to install a program in Emacs, use-package and then name of the program. And then you can have these various sections here and then you may or may not need all of these sections. Some of the ones that really stand out here, though, colon mode. So anytime I'm in a mode that involves PDFs, obviously I want this PDF-Tools program in action, right? I also added some custom bindings that I wanted to use because I didn't like the standard Emacs style key bindings. The standard Emacs style key bindings use N and P for next and previous. So going down line by line would be N, going up would be P. I wanted to use the standard Vim key bindings J and K for moving up and down by line. I also wanted to do control equals and control minus for zooming in and out. Those are standard key bindings that are often used in text editors and terminal emulators. Those are just standard key bindings, but they weren't binded to these bindings by default in PDF-Tools. So I've, again, I added some of these key bindings just for me. Then one other thing I did outside of the use package block, which is this block, I added one other line because I wanted to make sure that I disabled display line numbers mode. You see display line numbers mode minus one. So if it's minus one, it's turned off. I want to make sure that anytime I'm in PDF view mode, so anytime I'm viewing a PDF, I do not want display line numbers turned on, right? So that would be these line numbers you're seeing right here on the side of this org document. In most of my Emacs buffers, I have line numbers because most of it is plain text buffers that it kind of makes sense. But in a PDF file, it really doesn't make sense because the line numbers don't really correspond to the lines of text that you're seeing because of the word wrapping not to mention PDFs are going to have tables and images and all kinds of other stuff in it. So just turn off the line numbers mode. So let me show you PDF tools in action. If I just open a PDF, so if I do space FR for find recent files and I search for this file here, which is learn you a Haskell for great good.pdf. So this is a book called learn you a Haskell for great good, teaching you, of course, about the Haskell programming language. And I can scroll up and down with the mouse or I could go up and down line by line with N and P if you're using the standard Emacs key bindings. But remember, I rebinded it to use J and K. And if I want to go up and down page by page, I can do control J to go down a page and control K to go up by page. So that are my new key bindings. And remember, I also did control equals to zoom in and control minus to zoom out. If you have the popular library installed on your Linux system, which most Linux distributions, desktop Linux distributions are already going to have popular installed. What this does, it has a, it's a library that allows you to do things like annotate PDF. So if I right click somewhere in this PDF file and I add text annotation. Now it's got a key binding, control C, control A, followed by T. Horrible key binding. If I actually used annotations all the time, I'd rebind that. But honestly, I never annotate PDFs. I just read them, right? But if I wanted to, I could click here, add annotation. And now you've got this little icon here. If I click on it again, now this split here opens at the bottom where I could add an annotation. So let me get into insert mode and I'll do annotation, all caps, exclamation, hit escape to get back into normal mode. And then control C, control C to commit changes. It's very similar to making a commit and maggot, the get client within a, within Emacs, very similar. So control C, control C, the split goes away. And now that annotation is there. If I want to read the annotation, I could click on it and it'll open in a split or let me do control C, control C to get out of that split again. What I could do is I could right click again and I could display annotations. And by default, that's control C, control A, control L. Once again, I would rebind that if I use this all the time. But display annotations opens a split. It tells me what this annotation is, the annotations that I currently have in this document. I only have one, it's on page five, it's just text. And in the split, it will tell me what that annotation is. And if I had multiple annotations, you know, I could scroll through them and in the split, it would tell me what each of the annotations are. Let me cue to quit out of the annotations and let me cue to quit out of the PDF viewer. One other thing I've been playing around with here in recent weeks is edif. Now what edif is, this is a built in Emacs program. It's a diff program. Those are you that are familiar with like the standard diff command that you use in your Linux terminals, for example. A diff is a way to compare two files and see the changes, right? See the differences between two files. Now with edif, you don't have to install it because it's built into Emacs. There's a couple of different edif programs. If I just search for edif, and let me scroll down here. This program here, edif-files, which I have minded to space EF. What edif-files does, it runs a diff on two files. You're comparing two files, but there's also a edif-files three. And I've minded that to space E capital F. And what this does, it runs a diff on three files. So edif-files, if you want to compare two files, edif-files three, if you want to compare three files. And again, I've minded these. So let me show you this in action. Space EF runs edif-files. So let me find two files to compare. So let me go into my home directory and compare my bash RC with my bash RC dot backup. And they are similar, but they are different. And this is edif. Now by default, edif compares the files not in this side-by-side split, which is a vertical split if you're using VIM terminology. Emacs terminology actually calls this a horizontal split. But again, most people have that VIM kind of mindset, especially if you're an evil mode user. You know, I like this side-by-side vertical split. So this is not the standard. Again, the standard, unless you change it, is a horizontal split, but I'll show you how to get to that here in a second. And you see at the bottom, I have a horizontal split and it says type question mark for help. So let me do question mark. And then I get some key bindings and you can see I can go to the next diff with N and the previous diff with P. I also have a JNK set here. I added JNK for bindings to that. So if I do J, I'll go to the next diff. So this is the next area in these two files where they differ, right? So this section right here, there's a difference. If I go J again, it will go to the next diff. And the next diff and the next diff. And K would go back up. Now, if you want to use the standard Emax key bindings in for next diff P for previous diff. Now, one interesting thing you can do if you don't like the side-by-side viewer or sometimes you want to change between a vertical split and a horizontal split, especially depending on the size of the window. Maybe you had another window opened out to the side. Let me open a terminal. Now this side-by-side vertical split doesn't make much sense. Well, there was a key binding. You can't really see it because the table's all messed up now. But a pipe symbol. If I type the pipe character on the screen, it will change all of this now to a horizontal split. You can see here's the top section. Here is the bottom section. And this is a little easier to read since I had that terminal open. Let me close the terminal. And now that I've closed the terminal, let me do the pipe character again to go back to the side-by-side vertical split. Now eDiff calls these files a and b. So if you look down here under the manipulate section, you have the characters a and b on the keyboard. They copy a or b's region to the other file, b or a, right? So this is file a, this is file b. So we're at this diff here. If I want to take a's region and move it to b, if I hit a on the keyboard, you can see I just changed what was over here now. And if I go j to go to the next diff and maybe this is the right one, this is the wrong one, once again, I'll do a on the keyboard to make that change. If it had been b was actually the correct code that I wanted, I'd hit b on the keyboard and it would actually copy the file b diff over to file a. I hope that makes sense. Then you have a wx and wd for writing. So wd is interesting because it saves the diff output and that is an interesting kind of command. If you just wanted to save the file with just the diffs and not the whole file, you can do q to quit out of this e diff help information. And so you're out of e diff. Now the files are still here. You haven't actually written anything as of yet or at least I haven't. For me, I'm actually gonna use to undo all of this backup file because I may use this as a comparison and future video. So I do want these files to remain different. Then let me do a space wc to close that split and space bp for previous buffer space bp for previous buffer. Where is my config file? Well, I have a key binding for it. I can do space fc for find my config.org. So my e diff section here, again, I didn't have to use a use package block or anything because e diff is built into Emacs but I did want to specify a few things. So I've got set q, set q assigns values to variables. The first variable I wanted to assign something to is the e diff split window function. So how does it split windows? I want it to split window horizontally. And again, Emacs calls this a horizontal split. Vim users would call it a vertical split. That's the side by side split. Some weird terminology, right? They're a little different. I also have e diff window setup function. This variable set to e diff setup windows plane. What this does is that help information that was in the bottom split with the question mark that you had to type to get your key bindings. If you have this set, you get that. If you don't have this set by default, what it does, it has a separate Emacs frame, a pop out frame that has that information. And it's annoying. I don't know why that's the default behavior for e diff. I think most people are going to want this default behavior for e diff. And then I wanted to add j and k for a next diff, previous diff. And to accomplish that, what I had to do was define my own function here, which I call dt dash e diff dash hook. And within this, we are defining a key, right? Defining a key binding. And you can see set j to e diff next difference and k to e diff previous difference. And finally, when I've created this function here, we need to add hook. So add hook to the e diff mode hook. And what are we adding? Well, we're adding dt dash e diff hook, which we created here. That way, my custom key bindings work. Now I mentioned space e f was e diff and I had space e capital F for e diff dash files three, comparing three files. Let me just briefly show you this. It works exactly the same. Once again, compare my dot bash RC with my dot bash RC dot backup. And for a third file, I don't have anything really that similar. How about my ZSH RC? Because it will have some similarities. So what it does, again, you have AB and C files. Now, right, you have three files in a split. Again, at the bottom, you have your help information and that horizontal split. And if I go J, you know, for down to the next diff, we will find all the diffs. If I do the question mark to get the help information, it's basically the exact same commands whether you're using e diff files, comparing two files or e diff files three to compare three files. Let me queue to get out of e diff three and let me make sure that these are actually not changed. So some other things I've been playing around with, let me get back toward the top of my config file is same defaults. I have this section here, same defaults, which is what I consider the defaults that most Emacs users will enable. These are mainly global settings, for example, turning off the toolbar and the scroll bar and the menu bar, things like that. And on the last video, when I was discussing my config file, I did not have these last three, but I have since added these, which is turning off file dialogue, dialogue boxes and pop up windows.  Sometimes you do get things like pop up windows and menus and things like that, a file download dialogues and stuff like that. I don't wanna see any of that as far as a graphical dialogue box in the middle of the screen. Instead, turn all of that off and just display that information in the echo area. The mini buffer down here, right? So if something needs a pop-up box, just ask me that yes or no question that would appear in the pop-up box. Just ask me that down here in the mini buffer. I think that makes sense. Again, for most Emacs users, that's why I put that under this section here that I call same defaults. Some other things I did added some key bindings. So let me go to the general key binding section of my config and actually the last section will be when I went too far, the W key bindings, which were mainly windows-related key bindings. So managing splits, but you see now I have it as windows and words-related key bindings because I have these three here that I've since added. So I've been doing a lot of creative writing here in recent weeks. And one of the things is when you're doing this kind of creative writing, sometimes you want to emphasize words by having it all caps, right? So Emacs actually has this kind of functionality built into it where you can downcase a word or upcase a word with these particular functions. Downcase dash word, upcase dash word. So I thought those were so useful. I wanted to bind those. For example, if I put the cursor point right here on the word upcase, if I do space w u for upcase, it upcases that word. I move the point back to the word space w d for downcase, downcase is it. Let me use twice to get back to the way I had it where it was actually the word was capitalized at the beginning as it should be.  In my opinion, one other binding I added was space w equals for count dash word. So it's a word count. Kind of like the word count program, the standard GNU core util w c program, right? It gives you this information. It gives you a lot of information actually right down here in the mini buffer. Let me show you this in action on this document. We're looking at space w equals. And buffer has 1,013 lines. It gives us a line count, 224 sentences. So that's just how many sentences are in the document. 6,231 words, so word count and 41,684 characters.  If you want to keep track of things like word count and line count, that's a very useful built-in Emacs function that's available for you. So that's just a little bit of the changes I have made here in the last couple of weeks with my Emacs config. As always, I will go ahead and push these changes that I've made over to my GitLab. Go to gitlab.com slash dwt1, that's my GitLab. Look for my .files repository and grab my Emacs config. You'll find it in .config slash emacs slash config.org. Now before I go, I need to thank a few special people. I need to thank the producers of this episode. And of course I'm talking about game games, Matt, Paul, Steve, Wes, Arkotic, Armor Dragon, Commander, Angry, George, Lee, Matthew, Matt, those Nate or Yon Paul, Peace, Archim, Adore, Realities4less, Red Prophet, Roland, Soulastry, ToolsDevlar, Wargent2 and Ubuntu and Willie. These guys, they're my highest tier patrons over on Patreon without these guys. This quick look at my Emacs config it wouldn't have been possible. The show is also brought to you by each and every one of these fine ladies and gentlemen, all these names you're seeing on the screen. These are all my supporters over on Patreon. I don't have any corporate sponsors. If you like my work and want to see more videos about Linux and friend open source software like Emacs, subscribe to DistroTube over on Patreon. Peace guys.