The Mars Exploration missions launched in 2003, successfully landing two rovers, Spirit and Opportunity on the Red Planet. The mission's objective was to search for clues to pass water activity on Mars. The mission also included three previous landers, the two Viking program landers in 1976 and Mars Pathfinder probe in 1997. Both rovers were given an expected lifespan of just 90 days due to the notorious dust storms present on the surface. Spirit lasted an incredible seven years, surviving until 2010, yet mysteriously, Opportunity is still functioning to this day. This is due to several events which have become known as cleaning events, which over that last 14 years have been mysteriously cleaning the rover's solar panels. Designed to go offline during the night to save energy, it is during these hours that something, or someone, has been helping to keep our rovers running. Opportunity has since been given five mission extensions, which it has successfully completed. In July 2007, during the fourth mission extension, severe Martian dust storms blocked sunlight to the rover and threatened the ability of the craft's survival. However, when the dust storms lifted, they revealed that something had cleaned the rover of nearly all debris. On May 1, 2009, during its fifth mission extension, Spirit became stuck in the soft soils of Mars. After nearly nine months of attempts to get the rover back on track, including test rovers on Earth, NASA announced on January 26, 2010 that Spirit was re-tested as a stationary science platform. Strangely it seems, because the rover was not moving, it missed subsequent cleaning events, leading NASA to lose contact shortly after. Just recently, Opportunity has seen a surge in energy after a cleaning event in March. The Martian month, coincidentally, resulting in a power boost of 70% when compared with power levels at the start of this year. And now, mission scientists have released a self-portrait photo of the Mars rover. When compared with the dust coverage at its worst, the difference is nothing short of dramatic. Having just survived its sixth Mars winner, thanks to the most recent cleaning event, Opportunity now has solar panels that are as dust-free as they were when they entered the Martian atmosphere. Just what exactly has been cleaning the rovers on Mars, covert astronauts, or maybe its aliens? Whatever it is, we may never know. Why did we never go back to the Moon? Undoubtedly, man's greatest achievement, a feat which has apparently never been attempted again. There are many conspiracy theories surrounding the Moon missions, some for good reasons and others not so. A mission to the Moon, or indeed Mars, should be an experience which unites humanity under a common goal. Yet alas, this unity rarely occurs. It is a well-known fact that knowledge is power, yet unfortunately this fact can often breed deceit and deception. For it is believed by some that knowledge only makes one powerful when it is concealed from another, regardless of whether this always be accurate within reality. Because of this system of accumulating and protecting power, space-going nations have gone to tremendous efforts to conceal things from the public, and indeed each other. The United States government, for example, demands astronomers, astronauts, and many other workers at NASA sign an oath of confidentiality. Upon breaking this oath, you could face a conviction of treason, a crime which carries the death penalty. However, regardless of this, over the past few years, more and more individuals from around the world have bravely began to blow the whistle on these secrecies. Dr. Ken Johnston, former director of NASA's Department of Photographic Evidence, has stated that during his stay at the agency, he was able to see original photos of countless ruins, pyramids, and intact temples all resting upon the Moon. Not only are there now a number of independent testimonies, made by numerous figures from within these space agencies, and the accompanying programs, confessing to the concealment of ancient ruins on the Moon's surface, but we also have compelling physical evidence of such structures, including photographs released by NASA themselves. One was snapped by the Apollo 17 astronauts in 1972. Subsequently, uploaded to the official NASA website, it was originally labeled as overexposed. However as technology has evolved, and computer software has become more inept at refining images, it has revealed something amazing. Along with apparent pyramidal structure, clearly seen within this image, some investigators have also highlighted a possible monolith in the foreground. Was space Odyssey trying to tell us something? Predictably, many people have come forward attempting to discredit this discovery, yet fortunately for us, in the December of 2008, the Hubble Space Telescope took some extremely intriguing images of its own. Images which seem to corroborate the once overexposed Apollo photo. Do these images actually show ancient ruins upon the surface of the Moon? If this is the case, how did they get there? Or more importantly, who could have built them? Are these relics proof of an ancient space-going civilization? Or maybe extraterrestrial activity? Regardless of how they got there, we find their existence highly compelling, and could be perceived as a possible motive for turning the space programs into black projects. Maybe we did go back to the Moon. It's just most were never told about it. After all, knowledge is power. Thanks for watching guys, and until next time, take care. In our last video, we discussed the possibility of there being a secret colony on Mars, a colony made possible by modern technologies, advances in sustainable agriculture, and life-supporting artificial ecosystems, an apparent astronaut silhouette caught during one of the rover's unexplained cleaning events, and the resources such as water found upon the surface, making it an ideal candidate for such a mission. With running rivers, oceans, even possibly a thriving ecosystem, did we once call Mars home? If we did indeed once call Mars home, there would be undoubtedly ruins on its surface. Rare surviving features that would still litter the landscape, and over the years, countless possible examples of these have been spotted. And although many of these could be dismissed as mere cases of peridolia, others are just too perfect, too precise in their appearance to simply be dismissed. Possible ancient relics of a lost Martian civilization. Ancient sarcophagi, heads of statues, pyramidal structures discovered to match star constellations in their layout, most notably that of a Pleiades constellation located near the famous face on Mars, an enormous face often argued as having been nothing more than a trickery of light, this regardless of ancient texts linking the face, the pyramids, and the constellational alignment to the burial requests of a supposed ancient Anunnaki king. Phobos is yet another curious anomaly of Mars, known to be in a continually decaying orbit. There are many features of this satellite which baffle astronomers and researchers alike. For example, when one calculates its orbit, they are shocked to find that this orbiting rock should have crashed into the Martian landscape many, many years ago. What's more, satellite imagery of its surface has captured images of a very mysterious anomaly on a number of occasions, a cuboid monolithic object with no impact crater resting upon its surface. Buzz Aldrin has even mentioned this anomaly, specifically calling it a monolith, also noting that he believed, quote, God put it there. Is Phobos' enigmatic orbit deliberate, in a past attempt to draw our attention to it, subsequently discovering this monolith? Could it possibly hold undeniable proof of not only other life in the universe, but the past habitation of Mars itself? It is undoubtedly highly compelling. Inhabitation on the moon, we can visit other people with their habitation, we can keep track. If there's something very important to be developed from the moon, I'm not sure what it is right now, and I sure think we should identify what it is for America to make such gross expenditures again for human habitation on the moon. We can help, we can join with, together we can explore the moon and develop the moon. We should go boldly where man has not gone before. Fly by to comets, visit asteroids, visit the moon of Mars. There's a monolith, they're a very unusual structure on this little potato shaped object that goes around Mars once in seven hours. When people find out about that, they're gonna say, who put that there? Who put that there? We often cover the extraordinary yet unexplained ruins that can be found all over our planet. However, as many of these ancient sites indicate, our ancient lost ancestors clearly had substantial advanced understandings we are yet to unravel. We feel, it is clear, that they were indeed technologically superior to us, the modern man. Thus, the question we must ask, just as we are, was this clearly advanced civilization capable of space travel? If so, then why did they not survive the mass exodus, which many feel befell the rest of these lost civilizations? Many people throughout history have been extremely interested in the concept of inhabiting other planets. In many ways, the habitation of other space bodies is a sound, strategical contingency for species survival. For in a world at the mercy of other space bodies, hurtling through the cosmos, not putting all of one's eggs in one basket will always be a great survival technique, giving the species twice the chance of survival. Mars, our nearest neighbor, has been the subject of countless theories involving past civilization, ancient or human, and the focus of NASA's most expensive space exploration missions, spending vast sums in the pursuit of several successful touchdowns, and indeed, as mentioned, for a good reason. And just like the many ancient, advanced, unexplained features upon our planet, any past inhabitation, no matter how primitive, would not only be ignored, but logically, much more easily suppressed than the finds we share which can be explored by us here on Earth. For exactly the same motives as ruins on Earth are ignored, any ancient civilization that could be found upon Mars would meet the same fate. For the proof of ancient civilization, predating that which academia has condemned themselves to dating and explaining as our more primitive, modern ancestor's work has to be suppressed, academia must protect public confidence for the protection of current, profitable theory. Was Mars once inhabited? Was it inhabited by us? Perhaps the most worrying question surrounding all of this, with academia so hell-bent on appearing correct, will we, as a species, ever find out? There are many unexplainable ruins upon our planet, whose age, or indeed true origins, are still an enigma to be unraveled. However, we feel that thanks to ours and many others' astute and devoted research, we do now have a very thorough understanding of past lost civilizations' capabilities. In some areas, there is undoubtedly more than one advanced ancient phase of building work. For instance, we feel that the ancient pyramids of Giza, ancient relics photographed from almost every angle now, thanks to alternative research and in-depth scientific investigations, shows clear indication of at least three phases. These three phases are also possibly evident at many other ancient sites, in particular, Peru. What's important regarding these phases is that although they have undoubtedly been accomplished at vastly different times in history, they are all incredibly advanced. In fact, they are far more advanced than any ancestral attempts to recreate them, which can be found throughout our own, thoroughly academically documented history. This throws up some controversial implications. For example, did this ancient civilization, just like ours, develop to a point where they were capable of space travel? Or perhaps a more interesting posit, were these most sophisticated and indeed ancient ruins left by a civilization who actually traveled here from another planet to begin with? Perhaps Mars? Since its discovery, Mars has been the subject of countless theories regarding the possibility of past life having once flourished upon its surface. There are even those who have proposed and relentlessly searched for an ancient advanced human civilization having once inhabited its red landscape. We have indeed shared a number of Martian theories, supported by compelling physical evidences from its surface, including the mystifying cleaning events which have been experienced by each rover while still able to move on the planet. Although many of the most compelling, possibly ancient artifacts found upon the Martian surface, have indeed been covered by numerous sleuths, we feel the following objects' possible identity may have been overlooked. Pictured within a NASA image known as Sol 746, presumably taken on the 746 day, it shows a perfect sphere resting in the red dust. Although noticed, its puzzling characteristics, surprisingly, have yet to be linked with one of the most recognizable UFO shapes of the modern age, the metallic sphere. These objects not only witnessed, documented, and video recorded on nearly every continent on Earth. They have also been the object most often recorded on many inches of unexplained NASA footage from low Earth orbit, lunar, and now we feel much further afield. Could this mysterious sphere actually be a crashed metallic UFO? Although spheres appear in nature, under the identification of land pearls, its origins would have involved tremendous amounts of water, something that has not been seen on Mars for an extremely long time. Could this mysterious sphere, photographed by NASA, actually be that of a crashed metallic UFO? We find the proposition highly compelling. Most people have never heard of Peraeodolia, but nearly everyone has experienced it. Anyone who has looked at the moon and spotted two eyes, a nose, and a mouth has felt the pull of Peraeodolia. It's the imagined perception of a pattern or meaning where it does not actually exist, according to the World English Dictionary. It's picking a face out of a knotted tree trunk or finding zoo animals in the clouds. German design studio on Formative is undertaking perhaps the world's largest and most systematic search for Peraeodolia. Their Google Faces program will spend the next few months sniffing out face-like shapes in Google Maps. This phenomena of seeing faces was also attributed to the very famous face of Sidonia that was found on Mars. The face was first imaged in detail by the Viking 1 and Viking 2 orbiters. 18 images were taken by the orbiters. Viking 1 launched on July 20, 1976 and Viking 2 orbited Mars on July 25, 1978. The striking likeness the apparent natural formation had to a face allowed the image to quickly gain notoriety around the world. The possibility of ancient ruins being on Mars is not a hypothesis held by modern science. And it is certainly not a scenario that NASA endorses. Neither does any other space-going nation appear to have any interest in investigating the possibility. Many conspiracies have surfaced over the years regarding covert operations in search of exactly such ruins on our neighboring planets. Many claiming black operations have occurred, such as an Apollo 20 program, with some rather convincing CGI hoaxes subsequently being created. Regardless, what a number of authentic researchers have managed to accomplish by just studying imagery of Mars and also of historical knowledge of the region held here on Earth is quite remarkable. Subsequent orbital imagery of the Sidonia region of Mars have attempted to debunk the face as just being a product of light angle. However, thankfully people did not let these debunking efforts dissuade them from further investigations of the area. Some researchers who were versed in the works of Zachariah Sitchin connected the location to the possible burial site, a king. Recorded within the 10th Sumerian tablet, Sitchin had apparently translated a passage regarding a god known as Alalu who requested upon death to be buried where he would be able to peer into space gazing upon Earth forever. Although many claim Sitchin's vague understanding of the writings may have led to mistranslations, Sitchin became convinced that this 10th tablet also laid claim to King being the constructor of the pyramids. People who knew these fragments of information actually connected a network of apparent extremely ancient pyramidal ruins resting very near to the face. These remnants of once great structures undoubtedly aligned with the star constellation of Pleiades. What is astonishing is that these ruins would not have been discovered without Sitchin's translations. Was Sitchin right all along? Is this really proof of ancient ruins on our nearest neighbor? The alignments are certainly compelling and must be more than just coincidence. As always, thanks for watching guys and until next time, take care. The Red Planet Although many people assume it to be the closest planet to our own, it is in fact Venus which comes closer to the Earth during its orbit around our star. Mercury is the closest planet not only to Earth but to every other planet in the solar system at one time or another. Yet these giants bear in landscapes incapable of supporting life. This reality is partly why Mars is so often the focus of man's attention in regard to our solar system's planetary bodies.  As such, for many years now, as the human population has exploded and modern technology has made self-sustaining, isolated life-supporting systems a reality, the search for suitable places for future colonization of the solar system has become a more and more popular subject of study. One of the most important additional factors for possible candidates for this exploration of space is the planet's distance from the Sun, nicknamed the Goldilocks Zone. Just like porridge being just right, Mars is located within a specific distance from the Sun capable of sustaining life. And although space agencies and other fields of funded institutions staunchly deny the possibility of it once having been inhabited, possibly even by man himself, dismissing such ideas as preposterous, Mars' desolate red oxide landscape is in fact uncannily similar to Earth's possible future appearance if humans were to continue unsustainable activities or a cataclysmic event were to occur. Thus, is it so preposterous to ponder the possibility that the planet we see before us today was in fact transformed into its lifeless form by an event or possibly past insatiable appetites for its resources by an ancient civilization which once called it home? Could the Cambrian explosion, the sudden appearance of advanced life on our planet, be evidence of terraforming? Could there have also been a similar, yet now hidden mammalian explosion indicating our own sudden arrival here on Earth after it artificially became capable of sustaining us? An orchestrated introduction of a complex food chain by ancient man who were in reality Martians. We have in the past covered some very strange occurrences on Mars, one in particular suggesting that possible black operations to colonize the red planet are already underway. The Mars rovers were given an expected lifespan of just 90 days. This estimation was based upon the notorious dust storms which choke its surface. Yet spirit lasted an incredible seven years, surviving until 2010, and opportunity only recently ceased operation. This remarkable longevity solely a result of what has become known as cleaning events which for 14 years were repeatedly experienced and documented. Yet what is most curious regarding these events is that they always occurred while the rovers were offline. In July 2007, during the fourth mission extension, severe Martian dust storms blocked sunlight to the rovers and threatened the ability of the craft's survival. However, when the dust storms lifted and the rovers came back online, something had cleaned them of nearly all debris. On May 1st 2009, during its fifth mission extension, spirit became stuck in the soft soils of Mars. Strangely, it seems, because the rover was not moving, it missed subsequent cleaning events. Did our mysterious helper assume it had died? Join us in our next video, which will be an expose of artifacts, features, ancient testimonies and satellite anomalies, and many other factors which support the conspiracy of secret Martian inhabitation, supporting the hypothesis of an ancient Martian civilization that once called our red neighbor home. Evidential arguments we find highly compelling. We often cover the extraordinary yet unexplained ruins that can be found all over our planet. However, as many of these ancient sites indicate, our ancient lost ancestors clearly had substantial advanced understandings we are yet to unravel. We feel, it is clear, that they were indeed technologically superior to us, the modern man. Thus, the question we must ask, just as we are, was this clearly advanced civilization capable of space travel? If so, then why did they not survive the mass exodus, which many feel befell the rest of these lost civilizations? Many people throughout history have been extremely interested in the concept of inhabiting other planets. In many ways, the habitation of other space bodies is a sound, strategic contingency for species survival. For in a world at the mercy of other space bodies hurtling through the cosmos, not putting all of one's eggs in one basket will always be a great survival technique, giving the species twice the chance of survival. Mars, our nearest neighbor, has been the subject of countless theories involving past civilization, ancient or human, and the focus of NASA's most expensive space exploration missions, spending vast sums in the pursuit of several successful touchdowns, and indeed, as mentioned, for a good reason. And just like the many ancient, advanced, unexplained features upon our planet, any past inhabitation, no matter how primitive, would not only be ignored, but logically, much more easily suppressed than the finds we share, which can be explored by us here on Earth. For exactly the same motives as ruins on Earth are ignored, any ancient civilization that could be found upon Mars would meet the same fate. For the proof of ancient civilization, predating that which academia has condemned themselves to dating and explaining as our more primitive modern ancestors work, has to be suppressed. Academia must protect public confidence for the protection of current, profitable theory. Was Mars once inhabited? Was it inhabited by us? Perhaps the most worrying question surrounding all of this, with academia so hell-bent on appearing correct, will we as a species ever find out? Egyptologists He is also head of the Cairo University Archaeology Department. He rubs shoulders with top Egyptian government figures and members of the Egyptian state of antiquities. If anyone knows about Egypt's most inner-kept secrets, it's this guy. In December 2010, he was hosting a conference to a select group of delegates about ancient Egyptian architecture when he let something slip. He admitted to being complicit in the covering up of an astonishing secret. He has since retracted the statement and is now denying he ever made it, however, during the conference a handful of press reporters were present. They all ran the same story, shortly after the conference all quoting the same remark, making it rather difficult to believe that he didn't actually say it. In what I can only imagine was a misjudgment of trust, when questioned regarding the possibility of alien involvement in the construction of ancient Egypt, he not only confirmed this to be the case, but confessed to knowing and I quote, there's still something inside the pyramid that is not of this world. In a previous video I shared how the tomb of Osiris, once believed to have been a mythical god from Egyptian legend, a belief Egyptian antiquities would like to keep alive, was actually discovered recently. The tomb was found by traversing an access tunnel system just a few inches in diameter. From the moment this impossible access passage was discovered, they quietly knew they had found something amazing. The moment Egyptian authorities finally managed to get a robot with a camera into the tomb, a complete media blackout descended upon Egypt. Walls were constructed around the tomb and no information regarding the find was shared for several weeks. When the world was eventually allowed near the site, the tomb was found to have been conveniently empty. No explanation as to how grave robbers could have possibly got into the tomb has ever been produced. Was Osiris an alien? Was our previous research bang on the money? Even an Egyptian legend, the figure known as Thoth, was said to have allowed beings such as Ra and Osiris to exist in our realm. Were ancient Egyptian artists accurate in their depictions of these beings as hybrids? If as Dr. Alash Ahid states along with ancient Egyptian literature, that there is indeed something otherworldly under the great pyramid, could it really be a portal? And if it is, why hide it? Regardless of what it is, they are definitely hiding something. What otherworldly thing do you think is hidden under the great pyramid? Let us know in the comments. Thanks for watching guys, until next time, take care. Venus The photos, according to Leonid Ksanformeliti, present evidence of living organisms upon Venus, one of the most inhospitable places for human life in the solar system. The second planet from the Sun, it is believed to have once been Earth-like, although the constant temperature there now is around 480 degrees Celsius, hot enough to melt, bled, even hotter than Mercury, which is tremendously closer to our Sun. According to Ksanformeliti, who is Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Science for the Institute of Space Research, the images reveal the movement of extremely strange objects on the surface of Venus. Predictably NASA, along with many other institutes of research, have attempted to debunk his discovery, stating that the objects are nothing more than a lens cap and noise generated by the second hand pictures, claiming that some of the objects are not present in the original images.  Quoting Ksanformeliti in an article for the Russian journal Solar System Research Magazine, they all just emerge, fluctuate, and then disappear. What if we forget about the currently held theory regarding the non-existence of life on Venus, and boldly suggest that these objects, these morphological features, captured within these images, could allow us to say that they are indeed living? Scientists have not ruled out that once in the very distant past, Venus might have supported life in a time when the planet had giant oceans before the greenhouse effect created the temperatures that rule over the planet today. However, they firmly refute the possibility of living creatures alive on the planet's surface today. As Ivan, writer over at Ancient Origins, eloquently put it, the problem with science and scholars in search for extraterrestrial life is that mankind believes that for life to exist elsewhere in the solar system or universe, a planet should have similar climate and conditions to those of Earth. In support of his argument, and in staunch defiance of the rigidly held views upon the environment needed to sustain life, a reality discovered in 1977. Hydrothermal vents deep within our oceans, which belch steam from deep within the Earth's mantle, have temperatures just as hot as the surface of Venus. They are also home to countless previously thought impossible creatures, showing humans, especially the skeptics, that anything is possible.


Hello, I am Mr. D. J. Doshi, Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering Networks, Walthian Institute of Technology, SolarPort. We will be today learning about projection of solids. At the end of this session, students will be able to draw the projections of solids as per given conditions. Up till now, we have studied projection of solids related to simple problems or simple sketches. But during this video, we will study about bit difficult projections of the solids. So, up till now, we have studied two stage problems as well as three stage problems in which we have already discussed that first stage drawing is important by locating whether it is resting on base or resting on corner. And then we will go on producing for projection related to HP and projections related to VP or inclination related to HP and inclination related to VP. Whether the object is resting on VP or HP, depending upon that we went on drawing the two stage problem as well as three stage problems. In this problem, we observe a hexagonal base prism with base side 18 mm and axis height 30 mm based on one of its bottom edges on HP such that its axis is tilted to HP by 30 degree and tilted to VP by 45 degree complete its projections. Now, if you read first line that is hexagonal base prism is resting on HP. So, it is clear from this that top view will be observed as a hexagon whereas, front view will be observed as a rectangle. Now, another thing it is clear here that the prism is resting on base edge. So, base edge will be towards your right side because we have practice of tilting the sorry towards right side or in the clockwise direction. So, when we are rotating or we are inclined in the front view or in the clockwise direction we must rest the prism in such a way that the base edge will be towards your right hand side. So, accordingly we will draw the top view. So, top view will be hexagon with the side base side parallel to HP and perpendicular to VP. So, if you observe here we have drawn a hexagon here in such a way that this base edge and this base edge is perpendicular to VP whereas, parallel to HP. So, it is named accordingly A B C D E F and according to 1 2 3 4 and so on. Now, project this base edge vertically upwards project this base edge C B vertically upwards the height is given as 32 mm and the base side is given 80 mm. So, each of this side will be 80 mm base side will be 18 mm and when we project it upwards for the front view height of this that is height of the axis will be 32 mm. So, draw a hexagon of 18 mm side such that the base edges will be perpendicular to VP and parallel to HP project it upwards to get the front view of height 32 mm. So, accordingly we will name it now this is C B projected here. So, it will be B B dash C dash this is D and A projected upwards. So, it will be A dash D dash and this is E F projected upwards. So, it will be E dash F dash. So, this is the base on which it is resting on HP. Now, another phase that is top phase will be 32. So, here it will be 2 dash 3 dash 1 4 this will be 1 4 and this is 5 6 and the axis of course, will be overlapping by overlapped by A 1 or D 4. Now, we have completed the first stage that is a rectangle as a front view and hexagon as a top. Now, as the rectangle is in the front view we will be inclining this in such a way as given in the problem that is the axis is tilted to HP by 30 degree. So, we will make it inclination as 30 degree with HP. So, axis is along the line A 1 or D 4. So, this axis will be making 30 degree with HP, but well while drawing this case we must ensure that E F should not leave the base or X Y. So, it should be resting E F should be resting on HP as it is given the problem that is one of its base H is resting on HP. So, E F should not leave the X Y line or do the plane HP. So, now as it is given that axis is making 30 degree if you consider this as a right angle triangle where this is the right angle here and this angle will be 30 degree as given in the problem. So, this will be 60 degree. So, better way practically we will draw a 60 degree angle base H or base phase by keeping E F on the X Y line or E F on the HP make a 60 degree angle and redraw this cage here. So, this total prism or front view of the prism with axis making 30 degree will of course will be make base will be making 60 degree we will redraw it. So, after redrawing it we have to project now we will project BC downwards like this. So, this is BC we have projected downwards this is point B projected here you will get a point B here then it is followed by C. So, we will project C here we will get BC here then it is AD point. So, A will be projected downwards A will be projected horizontally. So, you will get A point similarly you will get D point that is projecting D horizontally projecting D vertically then E F similarly we will plot the point E and F E is projected horizontally and vertically F is also projected horizontally and vertically. So, you will get A B C D E F it is the view of the base when the axis of the prism is making 30 degree with HP. Now, what top phase? So, when we project 1 2 3 4 5 6 like this. So, 2 and 3 is projected downwards horizontally 2 will be projected you will get point 2 then 3 point is projected horizontally 3 point will be projected vertically you will get point 3. So, it is a 2 3 line then 1 will be projected horizontally 1 will be projected vertically you will get point 1. Similarly, on the same line you will get point 4 by projecting 4 horizontally and 4 vertically and about 5 6. So, 5 dash and 6 dash will be projected downwards 5 will be projected horizontally here and you will get point 5 and 6. Now, the question arises that which of the lines will be dotted line and which of the lines will be dark line. Now, the observer is here now the observer is observing vertically downwards from here to here from the observer E F is away from it from the observer E F is away. So, the lines related to point E and F will be dotted line. So, see here we have point E. So, point E is a common point that is E D E F and E 5 these 3 lines must be dotted line whereas, E F is here. So, line F A line F 6 and line F E will be dotted lines. So, in all if you observe 3 lines of this and 3 lines related to F total 5 lines will be there because E F is common. So, these 5 lines must be dotted line. So, while drawing we will join A B B C C D as the dark lines A F as the dotted line F E as the dotted line and E D as the dotted line. Similarly, here as this phase is totally visible. So, all the lines related to this phase will be dark lines. So, we will connect join 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 and 4 6. Now, as the external area or external lines will be dark lines. So, we will connect 1 A 4 D and this will be the hexagon.  We will join those with dotted line, but as a B 2 is a dark line. See if you observe this is a B 2 line. So, B 2 is a dark line. So, B 2 will be drawn as a dark line and then later on remaining part of F 6. Which is to be expected as a dotted line. So, F 2 will not be dotted, but B 2 when we join with dark line it will be overlapping the dotted line. So, remaining part of F 6 will be dotted. Similarly, here E 2 E 5 is expected to be a dark line dotted line sorry, but E 3 that is the part of C 3 will be a dark line. So, 3 5 will be a dotted line. So, if you observe this visibility of this, when you are observing from here point E F is away from you. So, the lines related to E and related to E F will be dotted line. So, accordingly we have drawn it here up till here it was similar to the video we studied priorly. Now, the next part is the axis is inclined to VP or tilted to VP by 45 degrees. So, now we have to rotate this or we have to rotate in such a way that the axis of this will be at 45 degree. But, if you observe here the axis is 32 mm, later on when the prism was inclined or the axis was inclined at 30 degree to HP. This is short term or this line will not be a two length line. So, 4 dash which is axis of the prism will be reduced by length. So, this is a apparent length, but when we are saying that axis is making 45 degree to VP means the true length of the axis or true length of the axis of the prism will be making 45 degree. So, here we will initially draw a 45 degree line which is expected to be a true length line mark the true length on this draw a locus of this. And on that locus we will mark the apparent length or top view length of axis here. So, it is O O dash which is a two length of the axis line that is 32 mm. O O dash is a locus or locus of O dash or O 1 dash on which we will mark this as a top view length. And then we will redraw these things here such that again A B C D will be towards VP and 1 2 3 4 5 6 will be away from the VP. So, redrawing this by drawing these parallel lines 1 2 3 4 parallel lines parallel to the apparent axis we have drawn. And according to the by marking with the compass the distances here will complete the view. Similar view we will be copying here. So, dotted line shown here will be dotted here also. Now, when we are completed this prism view we are observing from here. So, the line or the points away from we are A B. So, here when we project these things that is A B C D we will project upwards A B C D we will project horizontally. The points related to B and A which is away from the observer will be dotted. So, here again similar thing like here. So, lines related to A and B will be dotted lines other lines we will complete as a dark line. And finally, we will get the view of the prism when it is axis is making 30 degree with HP and 45 degree to VP. So, this part is new for you where we are drawing a two length line at particular angle and later on the apparent length of the axis marking it on locus of the O and completing the view here or rotating this total sketch at that particular angle and project it we will get the final view. So, for this I have referred engineering graphics by Mahalakshmi Publications House. Thank you.