Well, hello and welcome to Understand Men Now. I'm Jonathan Assey of JonathanAssey.com, and I'm so excited to be doing this live stream for you today.  Who wants epic love? Really quickly, if you're brand new to my YouTube channel, please hit the subscribe button, hit the bell, so you can be notified of new content or new videos. And if at any time during this video, the content resonates with you, please hit that like button so I can be seen in the YouTube algorithms. Lastly, this is your explicit language warning. I do occasionally drop an F-bomb every now and again. I use explicit language as I say to enhance a sentence. So they're in sentence enhancers. So if that's not your thing, I highly recommend logging off right now and go to another channel that you might enjoy. All right, we're gonna talk about this special technique that helps women attract epic love. Ladies, would you like to have epic love? I am sure you would. In fact, when I think of epic love, I think of two particular movies. And quite frankly, they're movies I truly enjoy. And I'll never forget after my divorce or when my ex-wife and I filed for divorce, the movie, The Notebook, came out. Does anyone remember the movie Notebook? I know it's been about a decade and a half since that movie's been out, or at least at the time I'm recording this. And it's certainly one of those movies that is really great story with James Garner. And I can't think of, was it Ellen Burnt? I can't think of the other woman. And it tells this great story of how two young people got together and dealt with adversity to somehow come back together at one point in their life. And it was very intense what they've experienced. And at the end it was just this grand crescendo of love. And it was a great story and it totally tears at the heartstrings. And when we think of epic love, we might think of a movie like that. In fact, one of the quotes in the movie is the following. And quite frankly, I love this quote. The quote is, so it's not gonna be easy. It's gonna be really hard. We're gonna have to work at this every day. But I wanna do that because I want you.   I probably screwed that up. Does anyone remember that? It was kind of an epic quote. It kind of demonstrates what epic love might feel like. And certainly it's a feel good movie. And sadly at the end of the movie when you see the two of them, the James Garner, the older version of them, they sadly pass away. Sadly, they pass away together in the same bed at the same time. And we think of that highly romantic. And then there's the second movie I think of when I think of epic love. And I think, and this is more of a humorous type movie, but it's the movie Serendipity. Serendipity. Does anyone remember the movie Serendipity with Kate Beckinsale, or I totally screwed up her name. And John Kuzak. And it's a movie where the two of these, these two people meet at a random place in New York. And rather than giving each other's their phone numbers and their name, they, one writes their phone number on a $5 bill and the other one writes it in a book. And they were supposed to try to meet up and they didn't, and then they kind of went their separate ways for about a half a decade or so. And yet they're continually pining for one another and they go on this adventure to try to find each other. They each individually went on an adventure to find each other. And eventually, in the serendipitous way, she finds him at the skating rink after he calls off his wedding. And it's a very cute story, very humorous. And we kind of, and you see them at the end of the movie, it's a year later, and they go back to the place where they met, where they were buying a glove. And we get very excited when we think of epic love are like this, right? We get really excited. These movies are meant to make us feel good. Now, as I reflect on this movie, though, I have a beef with both of these movies. I really do have a beef with both of these movies. And the beef is this. In the movie, the notebook, Ali, remember there's Ali and Noah, she's engaged to be married to another person. I'm gonna repeat that. She's engaged to be married to another person. And Noah was in a relationship and it was more of a friends with benefits. So she literally had to abandon a relationship she was in to go after this epic love. And I kind of take issue to that. I mean, she made this, and not to the extent that she should have stayed married, you notice that she should marry a guy that she didn't love. But I really don't like that. She basically, on one level, cheated on her fiance to be with another person. And if we look at the movie, The Serendipity, they were both engaged. One was literally going to the altar. They were both engaged. And then they decide they're gonna give it up to go after this fleeting relationship. And I don't know, I just take issue with that. I know these are great movies and it makes us think of epic love, but that's not what epic love is all about. It's not these movies, these fantasies that we've been adopted, we've indoctrinated into our lives. Because the reality is, is it doesn't take into account, certainly, I mean, these are younger people, but it doesn't take into account, divorce and loss of job and dealing with a nasty ex-spouse or someone who has health issues. None of these movies are really based on the reality of what love is all about. And so I take issue with this. So how do we find epic love in our lives? And what is this special technique to find epic love? Well, folks, I'm here to say it starts from within. It starts from within. Because the most important relationship you're ever gonna have is the relationship you have with somebody else. Let me repeat that. The most important relationship you're gonna have is the relationship you have with yourself. And yet we've glorified the importance of another person to fill the void that's inside of us.  We've literally set up our whole narrative in life is about we need someone else to make us feel good about ourselves. In fact, if you watch my YouTube channel on a regular basis, I continually say, we are suckling on the nipple of I need you to love me so I can feel good about myself. Because the real epic love starts from within. It starts from within. It's just like putting the oxygen mask first on the airplane. The idea of that is we have to start within ourselves. This is why I wrote my book, what the heck is self love anyway? By the way, there's a link in the description below to get my book. What this book is, it's a journey of personal development, self-help and spiritual work. Because the reality is is the most important love in your life is going to be the love you have for yourself. And quite frankly, we each individually can create an epic love within ourselves. Now you might have watched a video I did a while back and it's a video called why men love bitches, why men love bitches.  I'm gonna repeat that, babe or beauty in total control of herself. In other words, when we adopt our own self-worth, self-esteem, self-reliance, our sovereignty in our lives, we're actually preparing ourselves for the most epic love in our lives and it is with ourselves. And when we have achieved that epic love within ourselves it doesn't matter whether or not we have a relationship or not. And yet here's the beauty of it is you become a magnetic attractor for someone else that can be like you. Let me repeat that, when we stand in our sovereignty we can actually become a magnetic attractor for someone else that's standing in our sovereignty because it's easier to see the person when we're not blinded by all the muck that we've been adopted through these movies and the Disney and all this stuff and the fantasy realm. Even Cinderella, you know, is a fantasy.  It's the, there's, I mean, think about the Prince is one person out of this entire town. He happens to come from the wealthiest family. He had the best education. He happened to be attractive and there's only one of them. Okay, then the rest of the, what are you gonna do about the rest of the town? What about the rest of the folks in the town? Did these narratives set us up for thinking of love in this grand way? And I know most of you aren't really thinking of it in the terms of the notebook or serendipity or even the Disney movies. And yet they have been so indoctrinated in our lives. So it's hard not to have it affect us. I'm here to say that the most important love you're ever gonna have is the love with yourself. And by the way, I wanna encourage men to do this as well. This is not just singular to women, this self-love work, this self-compassion work. In fact, there's another book I highly recommend reading called Self-Compassion, Self-Compassion. Along with another great book over here, Daring Greatly by Brene Brown. Daring Greatly by Brene Brown. These are all great books to enhance our individual spirit. So we become so happy within ourselves that it doesn't matter whether or not we have a relationship in our lives because the reality is is let's face it, folks. Dating is a clusterfuck out there. It is a mess. And I don't care anyone else that tells you otherwise, it's a clusterfuck out there.  And mainly because so few folks do personal development, self-help and spiritual work to actually be capable of being in a relationship. And we're already dealing with the fact that the meeting, and I'm gonna talk about this in a few minutes because a question came in to me ahead of time. But I want you to know that when we are loving on ourselves, we're actually in a good space. We can actually be content. Folks, is this sinking in, is this resonating? Please let me know. Please give me a thumbs up. Please share this video if you're watching right now to spread the love because that's all I wanted to encourage everyone to do is not think of epic love in the way the movies are, but think of the epic love you can have within yourself. Okay, that's what I had to say for now. We're gonna jump into the best part, at least I think of these live streams and it's the Q&A. And those that are familiar with my, and I'm gonna start with a question that already came in. So just hold off a second, posting your questions. But just as a reminder, if you have a question, write the word question and post your question thereafter. You can certainly purchase a super sticker, super chat. Just as a reminder, those purchases are only for those that are on the live stream right now. And the monies that is received from that actually goes into a scholarship fund I've created to help people get personal development work on a discounted basis. And this is really an honor of my son, Connor. Those of you know right there, there's a picture of Connor. He's my son who passed away, so it's an honor of Connor that I do this. All right, our first question came in ahead of time. So I wanna post this. By the way, I wanna thank everybody who's on right now, but this question came in, I thought it'd be a great time to talk about this. So our question is, oops, we're having a little delay. Our question, Jonathan, where can I meet and how can I keep a great guy? Great question, Jonathan, where can I meet and how can I keep a great guy? And I love this question because so many women come to me and said, where are all the great men? I live in Los Angeles and there's no great men out there. I live in Dallas, there's no great men out there. How can I meet a great guy? Where are all the great guys and how can I keep a great guy? And I thought this was a really good question to lean into today because I know many of you are frustrated with the dating, mating or relating process, especially with the fact that so few of you actually believe that there are good men out there. I'm gonna repeat that, so few of you or so many of you believe that there are so few good men out there. And I wanna change that narrative because the reality is, is there are really good men out there, there are good men out there.  I mean, and those are professions that can go both for men and women. But what I'm here to say is there are good human beings out there. The challenges from a meeting perspective is we are no longer in an environment where we meet people in our daily lives. I'm gonna repeat that. We are no longer in an environment where we meet people in our daily lives. And what I mean by single eligible people, and for those who follow my work, no, my specialty is midlife, which is after baby making years and before retirement. I'm a coach. Just as a reminder, you can schedule a free discovery call in the link below to see if working with a coach is right for you. But my specialty is that, and so for us in midlife, it's even progressively harder to meet people. And as I said before, it's a clusterfuck out there, especially with these dating apps going on, it's progressively getting harder and harder because the reality is is we're meeting total strangers. We're meeting total strangers. So I just want you to know that this frustration that many of you are feeling is a very valid frustration. We have every right to be frustrated because the reality is is most people, right now, online dating probably represents where 50% of all new relationships are happening for those over 45 years old. And I suspect within 10 years, that number might be 90%. Think about it. Could be, I'm not saying it is, it could be 90%. We're meeting these blank people and the problem is with so many swiping, so many swiping, so many swiping, it's becoming progressively harder. And I just want you to know, I empathize with you in this regard. And the reality is, is there's great people around, the hard part is how do we get them together? I think one of the first things would be to be intentional about the process, especially with how you market yourself on these dating apps.   So the reality is, is first, it starts with creating a great presentation for yourself. Start with a great presentation for yourself. Shift the narrative and recognize that you're actually having to sell yourself to some degree. And when I say sell yourself is, let me reframe that, to promote yourself. But the second part of the question really relates to how do you keep a great guy? Folks, I'm here to say is most humans are terrible at being in relationship. Let me repeat that, most humans are terrible at being in relationship. And part of that is because they don't know the mechanics to a healthy, happy relationship. And this is why I continually over and over and over again recommend the book, Eight Dates, Eight Dates by doctors John and Julie Gottman. I highly recommend you reading this so you can learn the mechanics to the healthy, to a healthy, happy relationship. Thankfully, many of my, not just my clients, but many of you are purchasing the books I recommend because these books are actually great guides rather than the bullshit narrative. Listen, let me tell you something. I was recently, I don't know why, watching a daytime TV show where there was some dating coaches on and I'm listening to the narratives. And I mean, it's so egoic based. It's so egoic based. It's very much based like the book, The Rules, which is a very egoic, manipulative way to temporarily attract a relationship. Let me repeat that. It's very egoic, temporary way to attract a relationship. But ultimately, you can attract a relationship temporarily, but if you don't have the components to make a healthy, happy relationship, it's gonna be very difficult. Those of you who know, I created my relationship iceberg, relationship iceberg, and I have something new to share with you today on the relationship iceberg, but you can see on the top line, the above the water line is attraction. Above the water line is attraction and the tip of the iceberg is chemistry. And we all know that chemistry is hugely important for a relationship, but below the water, which is compatibility is shared values, blendable lifestyles and emotional maturity. These are the necessary components to create a healthy, happy relationship. And what happens is as your values, as you share the same values, have emotional, blendable lifestyles and emotional maturity, this water line actually starts to go down and there's more, because you're compatible, there's more attraction between the two of you. When two people are feeling shared values, their lifestyles are blendable and they have emotional maturity, they feel more and more attracted to one another, and this is how we create epic love in relationship. So I'm here to suggest, if you A, if you want to meet a person, the reality is this online dating is about the number one place and it starts by being intentional with creating a great profile for yourself. Promote yourself the best you can. And then to be, to keep a great relationship, it requires doing some personal development work, self-help and spiritual work prior to meeting and then be intentional about your relationship and purchase two copies of the book, eight dates by doctors John and Julie Gottman, purchase two copies and go through the work together. And I promise you, if you do this advanced work, if you do this work in advance, you have a greater chance of keep finding and keeping a great relationship, which will eventually turn into, and I hope, epic love. So for that person that asked the question, I want to thank you so much. That was a great question. All right, time to take questions from the group. Boy, we have a lot coming in. So I want to thank you, hit that thumbs up button and we are going to scroll and get started. Jean says, you crack me up every time you say that it's a clusterfuck out there, but don't give up. I met a guy on Tinder two years ago, but still come here to keep myself balanced and so I don't eff up. Jean, thank you so much. I'm really glad you shared that with me. Jackie says, reading what the heck is self-love for the second time, Jonathan, I love your book. Thank you so much, I appreciate that. All right, let's see what questions we have. Robin says, dating is a mess for sure, see? Sal says, very much resonating, Jonathan, love it. Thank you, lots of amen. Let's see if there's a question above. Bear with me, okay. All right, so we're going to scroll back down. Bear with me, everyone, thank you for your patience. Lisa says, question, question, that is my question. Robin says, that is my question. Diana says, it's amazing how loving yourself can radiate to attract quality people because you operate from your own sense of self-worth and not out of desperation. Yes, thank you, Diana. Sadly, I watch women continually give their power away in relationship to men. They give their power away to men and hoping that if the man loves them, they'll feel good about themselves. I'm here to hope to shift that narrative. All right, great question, thank you. Jenny says, are there really more single women than men? Many dating coaches say this, women should settle for a man.  I believe with eight billion people on the planet, the percentage of men and women is almost 50-50, almost 50-50, okay? So now, here's the tricky part. As, okay, so if we basically, if there's a single man out there, there should be a single woman. The number should be pretty close. The challenge is as we age, men tend to die at a faster rate than women.  Although quite frankly, it didn't work, my parents wasn't, that's a picture of my mom and dad when they were younger. My mom was 88 when she passed away. My father was 92 when she passed away and my father is still alive almost four years later and he's 96 years old. So give props to Jacob for being 96, so he actually outlived my mother. But going back to that narrative, I believe in the age demographic at midlife, I would say that it's probably, it might be 55-45, I mean, it might be, but think about it, if there's a single man, there should be a single woman.  So the problem with the advice that a woman should settle, I think some of that narrative is based on a old-fashioned narrative that a woman needs a man financially to take care of her. And certainly throughout history, women have had to compromise themselves significantly at the behest of the male population. Let me repeat that women have had to compromise, settle significantly at the behest of someone financially taking care of them. And roughly about 50 years ago, that shifted to where women can actually take care of themselves. So to the extent that told to settle because there's fewer men, I'm here to say this. Work on your self-worth, self-esteem, self-confidence, remembering that you don't need a man for your happiness and put yourself out there to be seen by single eligible people. Oh, something just occurred to me. There might be the narrative that the men might be choosing younger women, so there might be less men because of that. That just didn't occur to me as, or that just occurred to me while I was sharing this. So to some degree, that number might be skewed at a 60-40 rate versus a 55-45 or it might be a little bit higher because, but here's the bottom line. A lot of men in their fifties and sixties might want younger women, but yet it's such a, but quite frankly, why would a younger woman wanna be with an older guy unless one thing, he's got bucks. And the reality is, is 80% of the US population makes less than a hundred grand a year. So 80% of men have no chance of getting younger women, and quite frankly, unless someone's in that high net worth in individual, those guys can find younger women, but just because a guy might white younger women doesn't mean he gets younger women. But I'm here to suggest ladies, you should never compromise who you are just to be in a relationship. I would much rather you to be single and happy than to be in a relationship that makes you unhappy just because you have a relationship. Now that's my invitation for you. You have to decide what works best in your life. But that's my answer to your question, and I hope it helped, but that's my perspective on it. So thank you so much, Jenny. I really appreciated that question. All right, all right, Denise writes, question, what if he's a great guy and amazing human but a challenging relationship partner because of trauma history? What if he's a great guy and amazing human but a challenging relationship partner for trauma history? I love this question. So if you're in relationship with this person and they genuinely want to heal their trauma, I highly recommend that he attends the Hoffman process, the Hoffman process. Now here's the book, The Hoffman Process, which you can do at home. But if he could go to the actual Hoffman process, I believe there's one in Northern California and I think there's one in Connecticut and they're all over the world.  This is a great place for him to heal his childhood wounds and traumas, which will then free up his space to actually heal any adult traumas he might have experienced. And for you, I highly recommend it as well. And I would also recommend that if he's done, but he has to want to do the work to heal the trauma. If he, and by the way, folks, I'm a big proponent of therapy. What I'm not a big proponent is a lot of therapy is one hour a week with no real work in between. I'm here to suggest folks, the real problem with human beings, and this relates to therapy, is we spend more time brushing our teeth, getting our hair done, getting dressed up, all fancy. We spend more time each day doing that than actually filling our soul with meditation, with therapy, with watching videos that can heal our lives to reading the books I'm talking about. I didn't get to where I'm at cavalierly by doing it once a week for an hour. I've been doing a deep dive once a day for one to two hours a day to shore up my inner peace because the reality is most humans are suffering on the inside in some way, shape, or form of not feeling good enough, not feeling loved, and not feeling likable. So it starts by doing work. And let me just say I've done 3,000 hours of work in which it sounds voluminous, if you will.  The average person doesn't need that much time to get to a place of consciousness, of awakeness, of being able to look inward and say, I can go past my traumas and move past this. And then if he does get past it, I highly recommend the two of you doing this work in the book Eight Dates to determine if you're a right partnership for one another. Because many of two people are not a good fit for one another because they don't share the same values, their lifestyles aren't blendable, or as I said before, the emotional maturity. So Denise, great question. Thank you so much. I hope I answered it for you. Thanks a bunch. All right, let's keep going. Robin says, I agree. Cece says, Jonathan, do you believe ex-lovers can have a healthy relationship after four years of separation? If they both want to have a healthy relationship, they certainly can. The separation isn't the issue. The question is, how are you gonna get back together? And have you really improved or healed whatever caused the breakup? But you said lover and not boyfriend or husband. So it's very hard unless you're on the same page. And Cece, it's not about being back together. It is, what do you want if you're back together? What does a relationship look like for you? What does commitment look like for you? Ladies, I swear to you, one of my greatest frustrations with most of you is you're living in this fantasy realm, going back to the movies, the notebook and serendipity, and such as if a relationship is just simple as just two people being together. If you don't know the mechanics to a healthy, happy relationship, if you don't share the same values, if your lifestyles aren't blendable, and again, if you don't have emotional maturity, you can be back together, but what are you building together? This is the problem with midlife relationships as they have no clue how to build a relationship together. This is why I continually recommend reading the book, Spiritual Partnership by Gary Zuccott, because this is both an inner journey that can help two people get ready for an epic relationship if that's what they want. And then I would highly recommend reading the book, Maiding and Captivity, Captivity by Esther Perrell, and why I recommend this book is one of the challenges in most relationships is they lose that erotic connection with one another. They're not investing in the erotic connection of the relationship, and then the relationships start to lose attraction for one another, and then you're just going through the motions. Most couples, by the way, 50% of marriages end in divorce, but do you know the other 50% that stay together? I bet you half are more miserable together. And let's not even count the fact that second marriages ended at a much higher rate, and third marriages ended at even higher rate. It's because most people are entering into the process very cavalierly without any intentionality on being partners with one another. And I'm yelling because I wanna get your attention here. Just coming back to center. I hope I answered your question, Cece. Thank you so much. All right, Rhonda writes, is there really anyone out there male or female that is not asking for sex in the first or second date? So going back to my attraction or my relationship iceberg, you know, chemistry is incredibly... By the way, I've met women on a first date where the sexual chemistry was off the charts. I mean, we both were like this, right? But we knew nothing about each other. I mean, that's a very common experience because chemistry is brain chemicals being released in the body. Dopamine in particular, dopamine, testosterone, estrogen, and then oxytocin gets released in the body when we have sex where we're mostly women bond with men. So no, it is very common to start from a sexual perspective. Doesn't mean it has to be that way, but that's a very common way to connect with one another. Now it used to be if a guy wanted to get laid, he had to get married. And do you know courtship up until about 50 years ago lasted all of about three to six to eight weeks. I mean, two people saw each other, had intense chemistry but you couldn't get laid unless you were married. The literally the courtship process was a nanosecond, literally weeks before people. And back then, by the way, it was a lot easier to be in relationship because the most of the time their lifestyles were blendable and their values were pretty much the same because most people met in small towns and connected with one another. So they had two of the main components of compatibility. It's a clusterfuck out there because we're a melting pot now. By the way, my cup says swear a little, you'll feel better. So to answer your question, yes, it typically the magnetic attraction starts with the sexual component. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, it's just how it is. Or it tends to be. Grace writes, great men are everywhere. They're banging my door down. Once I learned to overcome some negative self-talk, replacing it with doing something I like for myself, I get compliments, I'm assuming that's what it says. Grace is so right. When we shift the narrative, when we reframe our negative patterns, our limiting beliefs and change the story, you actually become a magnetic attractor. Ladies, I know many of you have been married and divorced and have had multiple relationships and you look down at past relationships negatively. In fact, it's interesting. Can I tell you, whenever I talk to a woman from a dating perspective and all she does is throw her ex-boyfriend or ex-spouse under the bus and saying he was the problem, I don't even bother with those women. I do not bother with those women because what they aren't looking at is the three other reasons why they were the problem in the relationship as well. I do, any person who doesn't take ownership on their part of why the relationship ended without making it about the other person, unless there was a need to call a doctor, an attorney, or a policeman. I repeat that, unless there was a need to call a doctor, attorney, or policeman, I give no validity to someone who throws their ex-partner under the bus because that tells me this is an emotionally immature person to be in relationship with. Folks, I highly recommend reading the book Nonviolent Communication by Marshall Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication by Marshall Rosenberg. This will help you learn how to communicate better. And then another book I continually recommend over and over again is How to Be an Adult in Relationship.  That attraction level will never go down and that attraction will only last for a short period of time. Oops. All right, great question or not that it was a question, but I was piggybacking on that. Great mentor everywhere. Thank you so much, Grace. I really appreciate that. Okay. Gene says, thank you to Grace. Good question. By the way, thank you for your work. I value, I have your book and on the second time read. Thank you, Lisa, big hugs to you. I appreciate that. By the way, cute picture. Jenny says, many dating coach, oh, especially if they've been wanting marriage and kids. Again, you can, by the way, think of how many people have had children and then got divorced. Listen, one of my greatest regrets is I didn't learn this stuff when I was younger in my 20s. When I say regrets, I married a woman who we weren't right for each other and we had two children together.   So I'm getting emotional right now because I wished, I wished, I wished we learned this stuff when we were younger. I do my best now with my oldest son. There's a picture of Colin. He's a great kid and I do my best to integrate him with all this work. And I continually talked to him about this at age 25. My parents, listen, I was raised with two parents and I saw them as the fantasy. Two parents that were together 66 years is what I mean. I fantasized their relationship like it was the movie, The Notebook, not understanding that they had troubles and issues and I glorified it in my head, but I had no tools. I didn't have any tools to be in a healthy, happy relationship. So listen, I'm grateful I have to, I'm grateful I gave my wife gave birth to two great children. I'm saddened that we weren't a good match together so we could be a family together and that to this day still haunts me on some level because I was clueless. I was very egotistical when I was younger. I was more focused on making money for the family and not being a family. So I don't encourage anyone to settle just to have a family and kids because you don't wanna end up divorced and the negativity that comes with divorce these days is horrific because we don't know how to uncouple in a conscious way. This is why I recommend the book, Conscious Uncoupling, Conscious Uncoupling by Catherine Woodward Thomas. I highly recommend this book so we can learn how to break up in a healthier way because the sad part is the divorce industry is booming for the attorneys and not for the couples who go through the nightmare because they didn't choose the right partner and sadly in many cases, they settled for the wrong partner. Elise, that's how I feel about that, Jenny. Thank you so much. Great question. All right. Don't forget, by the way, if I'm providing value for you guys, please purchase the super stickers, super chat. Please help build that scholarship fund. I'd be truly grateful for that because I'd like to think I'm giving good content here. So if I'm making a difference, even a small donation with a super sticker, super chat would be too truly appreciated. All right, Sal writes, question. Childhood wounds that create a type of attachment style can attachment style change from adult trauma cheating or is it limiting beliefs from trauma that change in adult? Great question. Let me just say this. There's childhood wounds and traumas and then there's adult traumas. I repeat that there's childhood wounds and traumas and there's adult traumas. We all experienced childhood wounds and traumas and this can even be when you've been in happy when you had really good parents because as a child, it's difficult for us to perceive the world as an adult.  My third grade teacher, I studied really hard for a math exam and I created a little crib notes to help me prepare for my math exam. I was reading it, reading it, reading it and I put it in my desk and when I took the test I was the only kid that aced it. So the teacher was like, wow, Jonathan did a great job on this and then for whatever reason she stops, goes to my desk, opens up my desk, there's my preparation notes and she looked at the classroom and said, you're a cheater. I'm like, I study, well first off as a child that was a traumatic effect.   So that's the childhood piece. Now let's talk about the adult piece. Divorce is one of the number one traumas adults go through along with health issues, work issues and sadly even someone like myself who lost a child when we lose people in our lives. These can be traumatic effects and cheating as mentioned could be a very traumatic effect that requires a lot of healing. This is why if there's ever been cheating, I highly recommend reading the book by Dr. Sherry Myers called Chatting or Cheating to learn how to heal and rebuild a relationship if there's ever been infidelity. So to answer your question, a lot of human beings are hurting out there. They're hurting in their heart. Now it's not your job as a woman to heal a man, it is his job to heal himself and you can be there as a support person but be careful because ladies you oftentimes choose broken men thinking once they're healed these guys will be your hero and what a lot of these guys do is once if they've done even some tiny bit of healing they go find a bright shiny penny elsewhere because of the shame they felt while you were experiencing their trauma. Choose people already doing personal development, self-help and spiritual work is my invitation and choose people that have at least done some therapy or something before you get involved in a relationship with them. Now, here's the thing. If I was in relationship with someone when I lost Connor that's okay because that's even though as traumatic as that is and that might cause a breakup in relationship too. That might could for some people because they weren't able to handle it thankfully because I did this. I did the self-work love ahead of time. It was a vaccination to emotional chaos and that's what I want to invite everybody to do so they don't end up like that. Sal, great question. Thank you so much. I hope it helped. I want to thank Christine for the super sticker of $5. I really appreciate you say thank you for your amazing advice, Jonathan. Christine, thank you so much. I appreciate it. Christine Sunrise, thank you. All right. Oh, there's the super sticker that she just purchased. Thank you so much, Christine. I appreciate it. All right. Robin says, I'm sorry you went through that, Jonathan. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. All right, let's see if we have any other questions. Oh, Paula purchased the super sticker. Thank you so much. I didn't see it. All right. Donabee says, you are speaking many valuable statements. Thank you so much. Valerie says, you're right, Jonathan. No one should settle to not be single wrong decision. I agree. Thank you so much. Donna says, never settle.  Interesting point of view, but yes, you are correct. Kimberly writes, Jonathan, question. Hi, Jonathan. Why is it so hard to get guys who wanna actually meet instead of text, text, text? It seems like all they like, the attention off the women, seems like online dating has gone awry. Kimberly, great question. Now, speaking from the male perspective, I experienced the exact same thing. So this isn't a male thing. This is a human thing because these little devices give us a temporary hit when we connect with someone. And yet for a variety of reasons, we may not wanna engage. For the most part, I'm gonna tell you for me, I might temporarily engage with someone because their profile is somewhat interesting to me, but it didn't capture me. It didn't make me go, wow, I wanna meet this person. Like, I'd like to think my profile, when someone reads it, it's wow, I wanna meet that person. That's the way I created my dating profile. I looked at it as, how am I gonna promote myself? So someone says, wow. In fact, even one of the sentences in my match.com profile says, I hope you experience a wow from reading this and I hope you reach out to me. In other words, if I don't see your profile, maybe you reach out to me. So one of the problems is that they're not feeling a wow to wanna meet you, but they're feeling a little bit of connection because let's face it, human beings are rather lonely right now. We're coming off the tail end of a pandemic where we've been cooped up and craving connection and sex. Let me repeat that. Most humans are craving connection and sex. And so even a temporary hit from these, the dopamine hit that comes from these dating sites is part of the reason why. Look it, I said this before, I said it again.  You just have to remember and let me just encourage you all to do this. There's a great, there's, my guy is out there. My guy is out there. It's raining men. My guy is out there. It's raining men. My guy is looking for me. My guy is looking for me. I'm gonna put myself out there to be seen so he can find me. I'm gonna do a great job of making sure he can find me. I'm gonna do such a great job to make sure he can find me. That's just gonna be easy. So the minute he sees me, he texts me and says I wanna meet you right away.  And I understand your question but let me just say to you this, there it's raining great guys start putting that energy out there because all it takes is one folks.  You don't care about that.  You've got emotional maturity and then you have chemistry and then the attraction will take over just like in the relationship iceberg. Great question, Kimberly, thank you so much. All right, Jenny says, my regret is I didn't do the work younger too. I'm grateful your wisdom and your help. It's better late than never, we are all healing. Exactly, that's why I'm doing this work for you all. Jackie repeats what I said, dating is a clusterfuck, why date? All right, great question. All right, look at this folks, I'm gonna be very blunt with you. There's a good chance that 80% of you won't ever find a really great relationship. I'll be blunt. I know every dating coach is gonna tell you otherwise, but the truth is you've got a 20% chance of getting lucky out there. Here's the deal, if you wanna be in that 20%, then do the work I'm recommending. That's number one, to get you into the 20% that actually has a chance. Then put such a great representation out there for you out there so the guy can find you. But let me tell you something, 99% of you, and these are when you women are watching me right now, I go through these dating apps and I look at the effort. Here, let's go to Bumble right now. I mean, just as an example. I'm sorry, bear with me a second.  I'm just trying to give you an example. Well, I just swiped on the wrong. Let me just find another one. That's not fair. By the way, the only reason why I'm swiping is I don't wanna call out some human being unnecessarily, but most, it's like pictures where there's sunglasses, you can't see their face in the first picture. There's a picture of the sushi plate that they ate as their first. Like, here's one, look at this.  Who's gonna wanna swipe on someone who didn't put together a quality photograph? And she only has one photograph in there. That's from the male perspective, ladies. I know you're looking at men and their photographs are crap. But the reason why we date, ultimately, I look at this. A friend of mine, I got really down after my significant relationship and I broke up and I was depressed, very depressed. And I was like, I'm giving up on love and I don't ever wanna love again. And my friend said to me, so Jonathan, love is a risk. It's a big risk to put yourself out there. He said, though, it's the best game in town. Folks, I'm here to tell you when we shift our narrative from all the negativity of the dating realm, even when I'm pointing out the negativity and you come at it from a place of loving on yourself and knowing that epic love can actually come into your life when you start epic loving on yourself, you can put yourself out there. And still, you don't have to get frustrated, depressed, angry, bitter, or jaded over the process. You can actually step into positivity when you can appreciate that a great guy could just be around the corner. And that, by the way, folks, look it. I wake up every day going, you know what? My woman could find me or I could find her. Not that I start with it every morning like that, but in once throughout each day, I go, today could be the day. It could be Groundhog Day. And guess what? I'll go through 30 years of hell to find my epic love and I'd rather look at it that way than look at it from the negativity. By the way, you have a choice. Which wolf do you wanna feed? The negative wolf or the positive wolf? The red pill or the blue pill? That's the way I look at it. That's my invitation for all of you. I hope that helped, Jackie. Thank you so much for that question, for that post. All right, oops, we already got that one. Let's see, question, Sharon writes. Question, help, I'm 71. It's challenging on dating sites. I'm on as men aren't interested when they see my age. I state intentions. By the way, I worked, now 71's a little bit older, but I worked with a woman 68 years old. She, I can say her name publicly because she's now become a dear friend, Miriam. Met Alan, he was 69. They, no, maybe they were 67 and 68. They met on a dating site. Oh God, what was it called? Stitch. A lot of people meet on that, the older site and I just went brain dead. There's a couple of hour time and such like that. They met, fell in love, got married within 14 months of meeting and they're happily married and I've broken bread with them a number of times. And that was 68, 69 years old. Is the like, by the way, is the likelihood high? No, the likelihood is low as we age. But you know what, I just looked at it this way. It only takes 15 minutes a day to put yourself out there, 15 minutes a day of effort and that's it. And then go back about your day because you could wake up and never know. Just like on Groundhog Day, he could, every day he put it, he basically, Groundhog Day is a perfect analogy. He eventually learned how to love, by the way, a great analogy is the movie Groundhog Day because he worked on him. Once he got past the egoic part of his life and started to work on himself, he learned how to play the piano and the other things. He eventually was in such a good place of loving himself that he was able to free himself from this trap. This is what we're dealing with. Now, granted, it's a movie, but it's a great metaphor, a great metaphor from learning to love yourself every day because you never know what's gonna happen the next day and that's how he approached it and that's my invitation for you. Sharon, thank you for your question. All right. Kathy says, oh my God, I'm a third grade teacher. I'm extra sensitive to my students and never wanna traumatize them. Well, I grew up in an era where, by the way, teachers used to take the ruler and beat you up when that should happen. The nurses of Nice says, wow, the Hoffman process is so popular, all of the classes are sold out for the rest of the year. That's how great this is. That's why buying the book makes a big difference. By the way, the questionnaire to the Hoffman process takes 10 hours to complete. Let me repeat that. It takes 10 hours just to complete the questionnaire. You can actually learn and grow much about yourself just from the questionnaire. Nurses and nieces, thank you so much. I really appreciate that. Pat says, sorry, Jonathan, I'm positive Connors looking down proud. I think so too. I think so too. You know, I get a lot of negative flak. I get a lot of negative flak out there. And how I look, by the way, chapter five in my book, here. Chapter five in my book. What's it say?  Don't let anyone, this was actually based on Connors.  He was, you know, as a child, he really beat to his own drum. You know kids that beat to their own drum. I mean, Colin was the, my oldest was the studious one. He's the Stepford kid.  I mean, just a really good soul, good spirit. Connor was James Dean. He beat to his own drum, but he had this wonderful ability to not let other people's opinion of him affect how he felt about himself. So when I wrote the book, it was with him in mind. And his spirit was speaking to me throughout. And to this day, he still, sometimes I curse him for leaving me. I do, I curse him for leaving me. Leaving us, I should say, not just me, but his brother and his mom and all those that love him. But I know, and I know that his spirit resides in me. And so I invite you all to take the spirit of love. Take the spirit of love within you because that's what he represents now to me is love. Get busy living, get busy dying. What movie quote is that? That's my invitation for you all. A great book to read along the journey is Marianne Williamson's book, Return to Love. I highly recommend reading this book on your journey to loving on yourself. And just to kind of bring this back together, how do you find epic love? It starts by putting the oxygen mask on yourself first. And listen, I've told you that, look at, I'm being real with you.  And don't let anyone tell you otherwise.   And it doesn't matter if you're in relationship with a man because you don't need a man or I don't need a woman to love me so I can feel good about myself. What I honestly recommend for you is do the work. I know some of you are complaining but Jonathan, I don't wanna do this work. I just want magic fairy dust to change all this.  I'm not selling you on the narrative of leaning back in your feminine energy because the man will claim you because men are chivalrous. Look at, it's a mess out there. But you have a choice. Do you wanna be in that 80% that doesn't have a relationship or do you wanna be in that 20%?  And that's how you attract epic love in your life. Be a bitch, a babe or beauty in total control of herself. That's my invitation for all of you. Is it sinking in? Is it resonating? Please let me know. If this live stream made a difference please hit that thumbs up and please share this with 10 friends when it wraps up. You'd be doing me a great service. And lastly, any super stickers and super chats are greatly appreciated because I do a lot of work, I do a lot here for you. And my hope is I'm making a difference in your life and I'd like you to help me continue this so I can make a difference in all of your lives.  And by the way, I do change all these pictures every single time for those of you that do ask. I do change those pictures all the time. I purchase something called Mix Tiles, Mix Tiles on my app to order these. They're seven, eight, 10 bucks a piece. And my invitation is you can get those. I'm gonna do a little PR for them. I'm not getting paid for it. Anyways, I think this will be a great place to wrap up for today. I hope I found out, I gave you value today. Please let me know. Say amen, give me a thumbs up. Say you rock, Jonathan. Just let me know that this is making a difference and give me that thumbs up. We're gonna wrap up today as we always do. First off, giving myself a big, gigantic Jonathan Bear hug of self love. I'm gonna reach into the camera and give you a hug of love if that's okay. I'm gonna ask you to turn to someone, a pet, a teddy bear or pillow and give Iter them a hug of love because hugs are a great source of love. And let's face it, we could all use more love in our lives. I wanna thank you so much and wishing you a super duper wonderful, fantastic day. Thanks a bunch. Bye-bye now.


What's been great? It's been a little hot. Hotter than I'm used to. Cause everywhere I didn't play, there's been mostly cold stuff in California, but it's been hot and fun. It's fun, man.  So each day I come out here, I'm just having fun and join the moment. Oh, yeah. Cordero would, we talked to you. They talked about running the ball a little whole lot last year, but it looks like that's going to be the case this year. You know, what's your mindset heading into this season? Thank you, seasonally, new type of timing. My mindset is just do whatever coach needed to do. If you want me playing running back, quarterback, tight end, kick return, pun return, whatever. I'm just out there to know to help this team win and that's something I, you know, whatever coach need me to do, I'm going to do it. How much of a running back load do you think you could take? Man, we got one of the best running backs in my opinion, and Lee is Mike Davis, man, and see the things he did last year, man, running the ball, no catching the ball. And, you know, whenever Mike need a break or anything, I'm right behind him. You know, we got Q and Keith and all the other running backs. So man, and, you know, whatever load we need to take, I'm going to take whatever coach put me in. My number is being called. I'm going to be ready. What excites you most about this team? I would say this, a new coach. The whole, you know, new coach is always a different vibe from players, you know, trying to get used to the coach, you know, because none of us probably, you know, been coached by him before. Maybe a little guys who came from Tennessee or whatnot.   So, you know, we come out here with a mindset, you know, his first year, we're going to try to make it our best year. It's just different, man.   He going to treat everybody the same. You know, he want people to compete, you know, and that's what I like most about him.   It's been fun. It's been a process, you know, you know, running back. I feel like it's one of the hardest things to do out there besides quarterback, you know, you got to know a lot, rotation, routes, running the ball. But man, I got great coaches, man, and Coach Kitchens, you know, he's, he's been treating me well. Each and every morning, man, we meet, you know, just trying to, just trying to learn this offense, man, because like I said, it is different to me. You know, each and every year I feel like I'm doing something different. I've been on a lot of teams, you know, a lot of different offerings of coordinator each and every year.   Just being on the field is fun, man. How do you think that's affected your career? I'm just here to play football, to be honest. Simple as that. I'm here to help this team, do whatever I can to help them win games.  You're getting with Kitchens, are you interested? Can you, as first, you still want to do that? Is waiting your career? You know I'm gonna be out there. That's it. Come on now. You see my resume, so there's no if ands or buts. I would be out there.  Like I haven't rolled, but I wish I was there to tell them I got here because it was what we are so new for that was more like what happened. Honestly, man, I've been playing special teams my whole career, and that's probably one of the reasons I'm still in the NFL. You know, you got to find something you're really good at, you know, and I know I'm real good at it. You know, I'm just, I'm gonna continue to do it until the coach don't want me to do it no more. At that point, I'm just keep doing what I do. Yeah. Can you talk to us about how this offensive is coming together? This is the first time we're going to see it. It's going to be on 12th. Because everybody ain't been playing.  This is real life. How's it coming together? You will see set to him with 12th. That's my little brother, man.  If not one of the smartest players, he pick up on things real quick and he noticed offense in and out. And you know, he just, he's always doing everything right. He's just, he's just that smart guy.


In this video I am going to go through how you go about looking at your quiz grades in D2L. So some quizzes will give you immediate feedback, others you have to wait until I've graded them and then you have to go back into them. So it's a little bit different process and I just wanted to give an opportunity to show you here how you go about doing that. So the first thing of course is you enter the specific class of mine that you're looking for and then you would look at the general links button up toward the top here. If you click on that there is a link for quizzes. So click on quizzes and that will go into the quiz list and give you the complete listing of all the quizzes. Now any quiz that you've completed and I've graded will show feedback. So you can see that right here where it says feedback and then you can click on that to be able to see your feedback. So once you click on on attempt here that will open a new window. Now you may have had some quizzes you could have had more than one attempt. Most of mine will have just the one attempt so here it shows that one attempt on the quiz. It shows your total grade and it will show if you had more than one attempt and how it's graded what your actual grade is that is recorded in the grade book. Now if you want to see the feedback for each specific question you can do that and if you click on the attempt itself it will go into the quiz and then you can look at the feedback for example for the first image. Now I just have random feedback put into here but you can actually view your feedback there and we can also go down to look at another question. Again you open that up it will give you specific feedback on those questions. So it's just a quick way to be able to go back into things that are graded after you look at after you finish them so that you can actually find your grades to be able to review and your feedback so that you can hopefully do a little bit better on the next quiz. So that concludes this lecture on reviewing quiz grades in D2L. We'll be back again next time for another topic in astronomy. So until then have a great day everyone and I will see you in class!


Hey everybody, welcome back to Magic Orthodoxy. My name is David and this is a Magic Review. Hey, today we're going to look at visions from Matthew Wright. What is visions? It's a custom deck trick. It's a mentalism effect. It's actually a two-hit mentalism effect that is sure to leave your spectators wowing. You want to see the trailer? This is it. If I told you I could give you the power to read a mind, to see what they see. What if I told you you had the power to know this in advance? Would you take it? With great power comes great responsibility how to present visions. Visions is an incredibly direct and powerful double prediction. The spectator draws an image in their mind. A completely free choice. No forces, no list. The spectator now chooses any card from a deck. A prediction is now removed from the pocket or from an envelope that's been on display the entire time. The prediction matches the chosen card and on the reverse is the exact image the spectator has drawn in their mind. Visions is incredibly simple to perform. There's no memory work, no palming, no pocket writing, no sleight of hand. It's self-working. I'm going to pop this just here. That's your prediction. We'll come back for that in a second. I think this is you. So we'll try it with you.  It's a picture of something. So it's not like a square, a circle. It's not a shape. It's a picture of something. Something a kid might draw. Something simple. This might be you. What picture do you think I've drawn for you in my mind? A bolt? He was. He was a bolt. Wow. Brilliant. It was a bolt. Amazing. Amazing. Let's go one step further. First of all, right, you can see all these cards are different. That's important.  Just cut the deck and we'll mark that just there. Now, you were thinking of a bolt. And I was thinking bolt, which was brilliant. This time I've got one card in my mind, all right?  You've cut to no way back for the card I was thinking of. That's my favorite card. You were brilliant. The five of hearts. This prediction has been on the table the whole time. Inside here, we've got a business card, paid to put to it is one card. It's the five of hearts. It's my favorite. Do you know why it's my favorite card? It's got a picture of a bolt on it. No way. All right. So that was Matthew Wright. A couple of you might remember. I've done a couple of other reviews for him in the past. A couple of questions we always ask about all of our magic reviews and the first of which is what's in the box? What's in the box? You're going to get a custom printed deck. You're going to get a download code to the one hour video. You're going to get PDFs. You're going to get a custom crib. You're even going to get arts and crafts supplies. Is it what I thought? No, it's not what I thought at all. I kind of thought it was something else because I have effects that are kind of similar, not exactly kind of similar. And they use a completely different method. So I was almost expecting it to be a duplicate of something I already owned. I was pleasantly surprised. How are the angles? The angles on this mostly involve palming and card forcing. Okay. So if you can get around palming and card forcing, you're good to go. Can it be inspected? It is a completely gaffed deck. So there's no way in the world you can hand this out. What's the overall quality and production value of the video? It is filmed with a steadicam in a very dark room. Mostly it's Matthew talking to the camera, but you do get a few table shots. Interestingly, Matthew even does a kind of magic cam live demo like out in the real world where he has the camera like mounted to his chest and you get to see what he sees. So that's kind of cool. I've never actually seen that before. And there are some instances where the microphone though is recorded at different levels and so while you're watching it, the sound goes really loud or really quiet. You know when the scene changes. So there is just that. What's taught on the DVD? Matthew goes over all the workings, including the psychology behind the images that people will more than likely think of. The ad copy says no difficult slides and Matthew does teach this with a simple card force and a palm to pocket. But it is possible to do this effect without a load, but it's just not as strong. But for such a simple effect that could probably be taught in a matter of minutes, Matthew does go over every single nuance, including performing this as comedy as he does or serious. Matthew will also cover multiple outs. So the effect is 100% sure. Is it well made? It is a custom bicycle deck. It is done in a blue mandolin back. And like I said, it's completely custom like this was printed this way from United States playing card company. So you are getting the best of the best. How much practice does this require? Like I said, Matthew is going to cover everything as far as doing this with no slides or slides. Of course, it's going to come across better the more you put into it. So the more slides you're able to do, the more memory work you're able to do the better. How much setup and reset is there? This is only a deck stack. And it's a really simple deck stack that you already know. I guarantee it. I guarantee you already know it. And so putting it back into deck order is super simple. positives. Alright, so what are the positives to visions? Matthew Wright is an amazing creator and mentalist. His latest card trick does not disappoint. It's great for comedy magic, or the series performer and it's taught for all skill levels and comes with everything you need. negatives. Alright, so like we say around here, there's negatives to everything. These are just the negatives that I see.  This has come under fire from some critics. And I kind of agree. The markings on the back of the cards are hard to read. If you don't have good eyesight, if you have to wear reading glasses, or you need glasses to see things up close, you will need your glasses. And there's a chance there is a slight possibility that the markings might be too small for you. That could be a bummer. But there are ways around it. Of course, there are bicycle cards out there that do have markings on them that are larger. And so you can definitely buy one of those type decks and supplement, which is what I think I would do. Or another great workaround is just to make your own markings. You know, the backs of the cards are rarely seen in this effect. You could easily make your own marked backs that you could read and it would fly right by your spectators. And I think that is probably the best idea doesn't have any arts and crafts, it does. You will need to assemble this deck. It is based on a very old magic principle that you will have to kind of put together yourself. Matthew does give you the parts required to do that. However, again, you could supplement your favorite way to do this and make it your own. Is it worth your money? It's 30 bucks. It's 30 bucks. And like I said, you get a one hour video and a completely customized printed deck. So it's definitely worth your money. I think if this is something that you are interested in, please check out visions from Matthew Wright. Who would like this? Fans of metalism, fans of card tricks. Like the way Matthew does it as a comedy card trick, I think is very funny and you don't have to be a mentalist to do a trick like this. I think it still can come across as a card trick. But if you're a more serious mentalist, you could play it that way as well. So I think it's very versatile. Alright, so that is visions from Matthew Wright. As always, I want to thank Murphy's Magic Supplies for allowing me to have this trick so that I could do the review for you. And if you would like to purchase this for yourself, you can find it from your very favorite Murphy's Magic retailer. Thanks. Bye


Hi and welcome to the session. Let us discuss the following question. Question says, in figure 12.30, OACB is a quadrant of circle with center O and radius 3.5 cm. If OD is equal to 2 cm, find the area of the quadrant OACB and we have to find the area of the shaded region. This is the given figure 12.30. First of all let us understand that area of sector of a circle is equal to theta upon 316 multiplied by pi r square where theta is the angle of the sector in degrees and r is the radius of the circle. Now we will use this formula as our key idea to solve the given question. Let us now start with the solution. Now we are given that OACB is a quadrant of a circle with center O and it has radius equal to 3.5 cm. Now we are also given that OD is equal to 2 cm. OD is 2 cm. Now we have to find area of quadrant OACB. Now clearly we can see OACB is a sector of the circle and this arc AB subtends 90 degrees angle at the center. You know quadrant of a circle makes 90 degree angle at the center of the circle. So clearly we can see in sector OACB angle made by the sector at the center of the circle is 90 degrees and radius of the circle is 3.5 cm. And we know that area of sector is equal to theta upon 316 multiplied by pi r square where theta is the angle of the sector in degrees and r is the radius of the circle. Now substituting corresponding values of theta and r in this formula we can find area of sector OACB. We get area of sector OACB is equal to 90 upon 360 multiplied by pi multiplied by square of 3.5 cm square. Now substituting pi is equal to 22 upon 7 in this expression we get 90 upon 360 multiplied by 22 upon 7 multiplied by 3.5 multiplied by 3.5 cm square. Now simplifying this expression we get 1 upon 4 multiplied by 22 multiplied by 0.5 multiplied by 3.5 cm square. Now this expression can be further written as 1 upon 4 multiplied by 22 multiplied by 5 upon 10 multiplied by 35 upon 10 cm square. We know 2 multiplied by 2 is equal to 4 and 2 multiplied by 11 is equal to 22. Now 5 multiplied by 1 is 5 and 5 multiplied by 2 is equal to 10. Similarly 5 multiplied by 7 is equal to 35 and 5 multiplied by 2 is equal to 10. Now we get 77 upon 8 cm square is equal to area of sector OACB. Now this completes the first part of the question. Now we have to find area of this shaded region. We know area of this shaded region is equal to area of quadrant OACB minus area of triangle ODB. So we will find area of triangle ODB we know area of triangle is equal to half into base into height. Here base is OB that is 3.5 cm and height is OD that is 2 cm so area of triangle ODB is equal to half multiplied by 3.5 multiplied by 2 cm square. Now 2 and 2 will cancel each other and we get area of triangle ODB is equal to 3.5 cm square. We know area of shaded region is equal to area of quadrant OACB minus area of triangle ODB. Now substituting corresponding values of area of quadrant OACB and area of triangle ODB in this expression we get 77 upon 8 minus 3.5 cm square. Now subtracting these 2 terms by taking their LCM we get 77 minus 28 upon 8 cm square. Now simplifying further we get 49 upon 8 cm square is equal to area of shaded region. So we get area of shaded region is equal to 49 upon 8 cm square. Now this completes the second part of the given question. So the required answer is area of quadrant OACB is equal to 77 upon 8 cm square and area of shaded region is equal to 49 upon 8 cm square. So this completes the session. Hope you understood the solution. Take care and have a nice day.


From Dearborn, Michigan, it's theCUBE on the ground at Ford headquarters. Now, here's your host, Jeff Frick. Hi everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are on the ground in Dearborn, Michigan at a huge Ford event. It's called hashtag Ford Trends. It's a two-day event where Ford is bringing in to kind of social media people from all over the world to really talk about disruption. It's all about disruption. What's going on in the automotive business. Sometimes talked about mobility, sometimes talked about as autonomous vehicles. But really it's a two-day slate full of a lot of key executives from the Ford team. We got to go out and drive on the autonomous vehicles. But really again, talking about disruption. Changes in the way cars are powered with hybrids and electronics. Changes in ownership patterns with ride sharing versus individual ownership. A lot of activity and change in the business. So they brought us out. It's been a great couple of days. We'll plan to hear from Bill Ford. Obviously a direct line and there's really a lot of talk of the heritage, which is a nice way to say it's an old company, but we really value our culture and we're taking that heritage forward. Mark Fields, a CEO, really aggressive in driving this transformation. He's coming out to Palo Alto all the time. They've tripled the size of their Palo Alto presence. They're driving the autonomous vehicles from there. As well as recent announcements around starting a bike company in San Francisco that they're going to roll out to another five cities and they just purchased chariot. A ride sharing service that is also in San Francisco but going to be going out to more cities. So really trying to drive innovation in the way we think about how we get around really from point A to point B, which is probably going to be multimodal, whether it's a bike, public transit, personal car, ride sharing. And as it comes up over and over and over, it might change. If you're ready for a Sunday drive, you want to go down to the beach. Yeah, go take out the convertible and have a great day. But if you're stuck in traffic on your way to work or commuting or the way to the airport, there's other alternatives that are going to be out there and Ford is really trying to get ahead of the curve there. Be aggressive, be proactive. And as Clayton Christian said, disrupt their own business before somebody else does. Again, we'll hear from Ken Washington who we've heard with a number of times on theCUBE as this autonomous vehicle and the mobility initiative continues to develop Raj Nair. But really I think some of the other fun things that we talked about, we'll talk about is with Cheryl Conley. Cheryl's job is really to be a futurist, keeping an eye on trends. And as we talked to Cheryl, and she said, one thing I don't concentrate on at all are cars. There's plenty of people that know a lot about cars. So she's looking at other businesses, other trends, other kind of mega things going on that Ford needs to be aware of. As she described it to me, if there's an elephant in the room, don't be so focused on what you're working on that you can't see it. So that's her job to really enable people to see that. So it's a full two days. We're going to lots of venues, we're seeing lots of things, hearing lots of speakers. We're excited to be here, excited to be a part of the program. We're bringing it to you. There'll be a lot of assets on the website. Look forward to you enjoying them and we'll continue to coverage our coverage of disruption and really in the automotive business. And more generally now the mobility business, it's one of the biggest things happening in our time, a great story and something we're gonna watch evolve. So from Dearborn Michigan, I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching.


We're here at Churchill Down, it's time for horse name or nickname pot rod charlie. Horse name. Nice, I'm smarty Jones. I'm going with horse name. Yes, one for one ladies. Shanghai Bobby. Horse name. Name ding ding, all right he's got one. Dizzy Trout. Nickname. Two for two, this guy's too good. Boom boom. That's totally a football name. Two for two so far. Jelly Walker. I want to say sports. Sports. Okay. Lemon drop kid. That is a horse name. Horse. Horse. Three for three, you guys are too good. Coco Chris. Horse name. Nickname. Baseball. Broadway Joe. Nickname. Yes, three for three, he's undefeated so far. Midnight loot. Horse. Horse. Yes, mookie bets. Horse. And stay on the man. Sports. Sports. Congratulations, you're doing pretty good. Handsome Mike. Horse name. Winner.


Extrapolating down the grass from large cholesterol-lowering trials using statin drugs suggests that the incidence of cardiovascular events like heart attacks would approach zero if the LDL cholesterol can be forced down below 60 in preventing one's first heart attack and down around 30 for those trying to prevent another one. But is lower actually better, and is it even safe to have cholesterol levels that low? Well, you didn't know until PCSK9 inhibitors were invented. If that word sounds vaguely familiar, it's because that was the gene I profiled in the last video. It's the one that got mutated to give people such low LDL. And indeed, that's how Big Pharma came up with the idea of trying to instead cripple PCSK9 with drugs. After a heart attack, intensive LDL cholesterol-lowering beyond a target of 70 does seem to work better. There were fewer cardiovascular deaths, heart attacks, or strokes at an LDL less than 30 compared with 70 or higher, even compared to less than 70. There is a consistent risk reduction, even when starting as low as an average of 63, and pushing LDL down to 21 remarkably showed no observed offsetting adverse side effects. Maybe that shouldn't be so surprising, given that that's about what the level at which we start out life. And there's another type of genetic mutation that leaves people with LDLs of about 30 their whole lives, and they are known to have an exceptionally long life expectancy. Then wait, where do we get this idea that cholesterol could fall too low? The often repeated suggestion that cholesterol-lowering can be dangerous through depletion of cell cholesterol is unsupported by evidence, and does not take into account the exquisite balancing mechanisms our body uses. After all, remember, that's how we evolved. Until recently, most of us used to be running around with LDLs around 50, so that's like normal for the human species. The absence of proof that lower or lower cholesterol levels are somehow bad for you contrasts with the substantial evidence that cholesterol reduction prevents coronary artery disease, our number one killer. What about hormone production, though? Since the human body needs cholesterol for synthesis of steroid hormones, like adrenal hormone, sex hormones, there's a concern that there wouldn't be enough. You don't know, though, until you put it to the test. For decades, we've known that women on cholesterol-lowering drugs don't have a problem with estrogen production, nor does cholesterol-lowering affect adrenal gland function, nor does it impair testicular function in terms of the production of testosterone. If anything, statin drugs improve erectile function in men, which is what you'd expect from cholesterol-lowering, but you'll notice that these studies only looked at getting LDL down to 70 or below. What about really low LDL? On PCSK9 inhibitors, you can get most people under an LDL of 40 and some under 15, and no evidence of impairment of adrenal or ovarian or testicular hormone synthesis, even in patients with LDL levels under 15. The risk of heart attacks falls down in a straight line as LDL gets lower and lower, even down below 10, for example, without apparent safety concerns. But that's over the duration of exposure to these drugs. The longest follow-up to date is about six years, using multiple medications to drop LDL as low as possible. Now we can take comfort in the fact that those with extreme PCSK9 mutations leading to a lifelong reduction in levels of LDL to under 20 their whole lives remain healthy and have healthy kids. Cholesterol-affecting mutations are in fact what caused the so-called longevity syndromes, but that doesn't necessarily mean the drugs are safe. The bottom line is we should try to get our LDL cholesterol down as low as we can, but much longer follow-up data are necessary anytime a new class of drugs is introduced. So far so good, but we're only a few years out. For example, we didn't know statins increased diabetes risk until decades after they were approved and millions had been exposed. And not to mention, PCSK9 inhibitors cost about $14,000 a year.


We are very, very much pleased to have a partner as an EU to come in to strengthen our existing plan of action to deter those crimes. And especially not just a good partner EU and Asian, but we also have good friends as Interpol to come in and to provide us more what we call the capacity building so all our law enforcers know how to legally tackle those crimes.


In this video we will discuss the solution for question 9 on the practice final exam for math 1220. In this question we are asked to find the equation of the tangent to the curve x equals t cubed plus 6t plus 1 and y equals 2t minus t squared when t equals negative 1. And we are going to report this tangent line in slope intercept form. We have to find the equation of the tangent line and so as a reminder that equation will have the form. You get y minus, well the function, the point of tangency y1 here. This is going to equal dy dx times x minus x1. So x1 and y1 are point of tangency. And so that comes into play when t equals negative 1. So that's something we can find out pretty quickly here. So when you take t equals negative 1x1 will equal negative 1 cubed plus 6 times negative 1 plus 1. Simplifying that creature we get negative 1 minus 6 plus 1. Though ones cancel out and we are left with a negative 6 for the x-coordinate. And then for the y-coordinate y1 we plug in negative 1. We are going to get 2 times negative 1 minus negative 1 squared. So we get negative 2 minus 1 which is a negative 3. And so now we have our point negative 6 comma negative 3. This is the point of tangency that we are going to need. And so kind of preparing for the final answer here we are going to get y plus 3 because it's a minus negative 3 there. So this equals something times x plus 6. And so of course we do have to fill in that something in just a moment. And so that then brings us to the derivative calculation. dy dx are which we often abbreviate as y prime. For a parametric curve this is calculated as dy over dt divided by dx over dt. So we calculate the derivative of y and x with respect to t and take their ratios. The derivative of y with respect to t just by the usual power rule will be 2 minus 2t. The derivative of x by the power rule with respect to t would be 3t squared plus 6. And then we evaluate this when t equals negative 1. That's the value we need to do in which case that gives us 2 minus 2 times negative 1 on top. We have 3 times negative 1 squared plus 6 on the bottom. In the numerator you're going to end up with 2 plus 2. In the denominator you're going to end up with 3 plus 6. So we end up with 4 over 9 four ninths. That sounds pretty good for me. And so we plug that into our point slope form. Now the instructions did specify to write the final answer in slope intercept form. So that just means we have to solve for y. Distribute the four ninths through. We'll get y plus 3 equals four ninths x. Plus you're going to get 4 times 6 over 9. I always think it's better to reduce before you multiply, expand it out, right? Because 6 and 9 have a common factor of 3. So 3 goes into 6 two times. It goes into 9 three times. And so we're going to have an 8 thirds there. So y equals 4 over 9x plus 8 thirds minus 3. So we subtracted the 3 from both sides. Now in order to find a common denominator we should write this as 9 over 3. So negative 9 over 3. And therefore combining the fractions there you get y equals 4 ninths x minus 1 third. And so this right here gives us the slope. It gives us the equation of the tangent line written in slope intercept form.


Is it good now? Hello, everyone. Thanks for coming. I'm Amralli. I'm a computer science PhD candidate at Northeastern working on security and privacy. And today we're going to talk about cryptography in Python. So cryptography is very ubiquitous today. We use it everywhere, from your mobile phone apps to full hard disk encryption and even your wireless connection at home. It's almost everywhere. Every respectful program language has some sort of support for encryption and decryption or cryptographic libraries. And it's even embedded inside your CPUs. What I mean by being embedded inside CPUs right now, for example, Intel and even AMD CPUs have support for AS encryption, which means by one AS, by one assembly instruction, you can just encrypt or decrypt your messages. And to be honest, it's really not hard to do crypto in the right way. But there are a lot of crypto failures in real world. For example, in case of password breaches in LinkedIn, Adobe, and Ashley Madison, they were either not solving their password or encrypting in ECB format. Wi-Fi, they have something called the VEP, which was completely broken because they were reusing their IV or initialization vector. Snapchat, they were hard coding the encryption and decryption key inside the app. And they were using ECB mod, which means it's completely broken. And even in the case of Debian Linux, they had a weak random number generation, which resulted in breaking a lot of SSH keys. So before me, there was a talk on cryptography in general. And John gave a very good introduction to whole crypto. So I'm not going to go to the classic crypto anymore. I'm just going to talk about modern crypto. So modern crypto, we have two forms, the symmetric encryption and asymmetric encryption. As you can see, in symmetric encryption, we use the same key for both encryption and decryption. And the hard part in symmetric is to transfer this key in a secure way. And if you have a way to transmit a very long secure key, then you can either use that for even sending your messages. More modern innovation in cryptography was asymmetric encryption or what we call public encryption. The first instance was in the 1970s, Diffie Hellman. And the way it works, you have two keys, a public key and a private key. A public key can be public, and you announce it to the world. And you have a private key that you have to keep it yourself. What you can do, you can encrypt the message with your public key and decrypt the private key. And if you share your public key with the world, they cannot infer what is your private key. So it's one-way function. From the private key, you can get your public key. But from the public key, you cannot infer the private key. The differences between the symmetric and asymmetric encryption is that symmetric encryption only at software level is about 1,000 times faster. And right now, when you have Harvard support, it's going to be even much faster. The other problem is you don't, for symmetric key, you need to share your secret key. But in public and private, you can just announce your public key. And it has support in CPU. And for in every real world system, like when you use SSL or SSH, you have a combination of public encryption plus symmetric encryption. You combine the both. The most famous or the currently used symmetric encryption algorithm is called AES. It's Advanced Encryption Standard, also known as Randall. It was invited by two Belgian cryptographers. And it was part of the National Institute of Standard and Technology, or NIST competition to find the next cryptographic algorithm. It had a couple of requirements. One of them was it should be fast in both software and hardware implementation. For example, something like this was really fast in hardware implementation, so it was slower in software. And the other requirement that the block size should be 28 bits, and the key sizes should be 128, 192, and 256. This algorithm was first published in 1998, and there are a couple of competition. In 2001, it was finally standardized, finalized, and published to the public. The other candidates were Mars, RC6, Serpent, and TwoFish. They are already implemented in the real world, but no one used them that much. AES is something called a cipher block, which means it operates on a block of cipher. And that blocks us 128 bits. Your data should be 128 bits, and it just works on that block of data. It just transforms that data to something G-Bridge. And later on, you can convert that G-Bridge to something meaningful. If you have a message that's longer than 128 bits, you just need to encrypt each block and combine them in a way together. So exactly like making a coffee, you have coffee beans, you have water, and milk. It depends how you're going to combine them together. At the end, you're going to get coffee.  There is a procedure. Some of them are better, some of them are worse, and some of them are just wrong. In terms of a module of operation for crypto, ECB is like drinking every separate piece of your coffee separately. It's just wrong. Never use it. If you see somewhere, it's wrong. The CBC and CTR, both of them are secure. CTR, or the counter mode, has more functionality. It means you can do parallel encryption and decryption. So it's going to be faster. And you don't need to go sequential. You don't need to encrypt or decrypt your messages sequentially. And to give you a graphical representation of what's the difference between ECB and CBC encryption, for example, the original version, if that's Tux, Linux, Image. If you encrypt it with using something ECB, after encryption, you're still going to see the patterns inside your data. So it means it's going to be broken. I won't be able to tell exactly what was the message from just looking at the data, but I can see the patterns inside it. But if you use something like CBC or CTR, it's going to completely get rid of the pattern that you have in data. So it's going to completely loop random. That's why you should never use ECB. The RSA, or in medicine by Rivas, Shamir, and Aeloman, is the first practical public encryption system that we have. It was published in 1977, almost 40 years ago. And it was patented until 2001. That's why, for example, something like Elgamon that was mentioned in the previous talk and something called the DSA, the digital signature algorithm based on Elgamon, were being used in many protocols. Because RSA was patented until 2001. And it's based on the hardness of factoring problem and modular arithmetic. So the definition of RSA is you have a message, M, and the decryption, D, and ciphertext C. The way it works, you just choose a random number, E, and you exponent your message to E, and then do a mod operation. You get the ciphertext. And if you do the same thing with the private key and cipher, you get M. This encryption is very simplistic. It's called textbook RSA, and it's not secure in something called the inCPA, or chosen plaintext attack. But you get two big random numbers, a P and a Q.  We're going to see an example after this. And then you calculate your encryption key, which is a co-prime to your phi of N. And it's between 1 to phi of N. And you can get the inverse, and your private key is going to be the inverse of your public key or D in mod N. And one of the property of these RSAs is that if you do encryption of the encryption of a message or encryption of a decryption of message, at the end you're going to end up with N. It's based on Euler's theorem, because E to the power of D is equal to 1, so N to the power of 1 is going to be 1 at the end. So to give you a better view of an example, for example, if we take P and Q as random numbers. In a real world, these random numbers are much bigger. So think of about 400 digits instead of one, two, three digits. In real world, these numbers are going to be more than 400 digits. But for example, imagine we have P and Q, both are prime numbers. N would be 55, 5 times 11, 55. And our phi of N would be 10 times 4 or 4D. Then we choose the encryption key or E, something that's prime and between 1, 2, phi of N, 3. So to calculate the D or the private key, you need to find the inverse of your encryption key or E inside the phi of N. When you do E times D mod of N, as we had in previous talk, you should get 1. So if E is 3, then D be 27, and then you're going to end up with 81. And 81 mod of 80 is 1. So that's why 27 is inverse of E in phi of N. And your public key is going to be the E and the number N. And your private key is going to be D and your number N. And then if your message, you can represent each message like when they were asking a number as a number. So everything is a byte. All bytes are a number. So you can just do exponential and numbers. So if your message is 2, then the encryption of your message is going to be 8, and the decryption of message 8 to the power of 27 is going to be 2 again. You get the same message. The other crypto primitive that we have is hashing function. What it does, you take along a big message, and you can generate a digest, which is much shorter. One of the reasons that we use this, for example, when you download a file from internet, you see something called the hash of the file, when you want to make sure your file is exactly the same. So if you need any modification to 1 bit in the file, you're going to get a completely different hash. This way, you can make sure the integrity of your file. And a hashing function should have three properties. One of them is pre-image, the second pre-image, and the collision. Which means if I give you a hash of message, it should be inverse. So you shouldn't be able to tell me what was the message that I just produced the hash of. The other thing is if I give you M and you have the hash of it, you shouldn't be able to find another message M prime that's not equal to M and has the same hash. And the other properties, if you shouldn't be able to choose any two messages that are not equal and have the same hash, these are the properties that we want. And right now, the recommendation is to use SHA-2 or SHA-3. So fortunately, you don't need to implement any of these cryptographic primitives or know much about them. You just need to know the basic idea behind them and what properties they provide and what they are. Right now, in Python, like two, three years ago, it wasn't that great to support. But right now, we have more than half a dozen cryptographic libraries in Python that do everything correctly. They are created by people who know how to actually implement crypto protocols in a secure way. Because just encrypting some basic modular arithmetic is easy. But making sure if it's secure against timing attacks and et cetera, it's much harder. So PyCrypto is the first oldest and mostly wide cryptographic library in the wide right now. But it's not that updated anymore. And the code is kind of ad hoc-based. So the C-based code that the Python calls is created by the person himself. M2Crypto has bindings, the SWEAK bindings, to OpenSSL code. So the C code is secure. But the API and documentation are not as great. The alternative that I really like, and it's a newer project, it's called Cryptography, is created by PyCA, or the Python Cryptography Authority. They are a group very involved and very active. The other properties as cryptography works on Python 2, Python 3, and even Python implementation of Python. So you can use it with almost everything. The other benefit is it has OpenSSL CIFI bindings. So CIFI is a newer wrapper kind of functionality that you can call your C code from your Python or other scripting languages. And the code is very readable. They have a good documentation with caution. For example, you don't use this cryptographic protocol. It's broken, or how to use cryptographic protocol in a secure way. And there are other examples like PyNCL or NSS that uses the Firefox. But cryptography, I think, is like if I had to recommend one cryptographic protocol, it would be the cryptographic protocol. To give you some examples of how to use the protocols, for example, if you want to make a hash of your messages, what you need to do, you just need to import your default backend. The default backend would be OpenSSL. And also, you need to tell from your primitives what you want to do. So all these cryptographic function actions that we talked are primitive. You have to say, I want to import the hashing function from my primitives.  You say, from the hashes, I want to create a hash. And what kind of hashing mechanism that you want to use? We are using SHA-2, and the size is 256 bytes. And we say, as a backend, use the default backend.   And you get a digest. And for example, this is the hash of Pygathom 2016 in base 64 encoding. So to do something as like AES is as simple as a few lines of code, you import OS. OS has some functionality called uRandom for generating random numbers. The random numbers that it generates are cryptographically secure. And it's not blocking. Because if you do OS.Random is a blocking function. It means it waits for the CPU to generate enough entropy. But uRandom just uses entropy inside the random to use as a seed and uses a pseudo random number generator to create a random number. So for every application, you can just use uRandom. It's completely secure. Always use OS.urandom to generate keys or your random numbers. And you can specify the size that you want in bytes. So we said AES is 128 bits. So we say 16 bytes. And you can choose your cipher. You say, I want to use this algorithm with this key. I'm using the CBC mode that we talked about. We had the ECB, CBC, and CTR. The CBC one was secure. We use the CBC with this IV. And we say, use the default back end.   For using something like RSA, again, you don't need to delve into the key generation yourself. You can just call the key generation functionality inside the library. What you do, you say, from your primitives, RSA was asymmetric or public encryption. You import RSA from the asymmetric. And you say, you want to generate a private key with public exponent that these are standards. Like this public exponent is a standard public exponent. Your public exponent can be something that you use many times. And the private key is the important one and it's private. And you determine your key size. Right now, 248 is anything above 124. It should be definitely above 124. But even 1024 is not that secure. So you have to use something around 2048, which means 2048 bits of security, which gives you a equivalent of 128-bit symmetric security. And then to get a public key, after you generate your private key, you just call the public key and you get the public key of your private key. To encrypt a message, if you remember to talk, the textbook RSA is insecure because if you have the same message, the encryption is always going to be the same. So there is something called the OAP padding, which introduces a randomness. If you have two same messages, the encryption each time is going to be different. You can still decrypt the message, but the encryption each time is going to be different. So you're not going to leak any information. That's called the OAP. You say what is your message. You create your encryptor by using your public key to encrypt the message. I want to use my public key to encrypt the message. The padding, the OAP, is to mitigate this leakage attack. And then you say what hashing function you want to use. So these are the standards. Again, anything after the padding.oap, you can just copy this code exactly. You don't need to change anything here, this standard code. And for decrypting the same message, you just use your private key, decrypt the ciphertext that you just created here, and everything is exactly the same. If you just want to encrypt, for example, your files on your computer or something like that, the cryptography has some functionality or some recipe called Vernet. It does the AES in CVC mode, 128-bit key size. And it also produces a Mac to make sure your files haven't been modified. So you can just use that. You don't need to implement anything. Just one line of code. And you just have to, for example, one of the ways that you can create or remember this random key is that you have a simple password. And then by some hashing function, you expand your simple password to a key size, and then use as your key. So you can just pass it your key. You can either randomly generate it or pass it your own key that you are using. And then you encrypt whatever you want. You get a token. And that token is the encryption of your message plus hashing or the authentication code. And then you can just simply decrypt whatever you had that token exactly. So a few takeaways. And never invent your own cryptographic protocol or algorithm because there are people who are cryptographers and experts and have already produced these things. Everyone is using them. If they are good enough for top secret documents, they are good enough for us. Don't implement your own crypto library, even though all this arithmetic or mathematics is very simple, you need to take care of side channel attacks. For example, timing. One of the cases in terms of Cesar crypto library, they were using the normal Python comparison. If you do an equal between two strings, the first time that the strings are not equal is going to just quit comparing. But you always for crypto, you need to do a constant time comparison of the strings. Otherwise, you can decrypt a message without knowing the key by using some attacks. That's why you have to take care of all these subtle things that you won't know of unless you're implement your own cryptographic libraries. So never implement your own crypto library. To be honest, doing it crypto is not hard. It's very easy. As we saw, if you just follow this footstep, you would have a secure cryptographic protocol. However, most of the documentation that you find online are either outdated or most of the time they're wrong. For example, they use as a secret key. For example, they use password as an example because they cannot just put some random number there. You just use very simplistic. And if you just copy paste that code, you're producing a wrong code. Or they sometimes suggest using ECB. And right now we know that ECB is completely broken. So don't trust all the documentation that you find online. If there is something called SSL, most of you are familiar with it. For example, whenever you visit a website that has HTTPS, it means it's running SSL. So if you have data in transit, mean real-time communication between a network, you can just, whatever program that you have, wrap it inside SSL, inside Python, you have the support. And just wrap everything inside SSL and send it. You don't need to think about cryptographic yourself. And if you want to store some data on your computer, for example, hard disk encryption, encrypting your files, this kind of stuff, there is another thing called PGP. Again, it's a secure protocol. We can just use that. You don't need to worry or think about implementing your own cryptographic libraries. That's it. Thank you and are there any questions?